Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Parkside Residential Development - Shea Homes - Approved rev
City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street • Huntington Beach, CA 92648 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 17,t909 ® JOAN L. FLYNN CITY CLERK NOTICE OF ACTION June 9, 2009 A. Richard Fitch, Jr. Hunsaker& Associates 3 Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: Revised Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377(R) and 15419(R)/ Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 (Revisions to Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18) Parkside Residential Development REQUEST: TTM: To revise previously approved plans for the Parkside residential development and subdivide approximately 45 acres into 111 numbered lots and 29 lettered lots (Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15377) for single family dwelling purposes including newly created, restored and preserved wetlands and buffer area, a protected Eucalyptus grove, a Natural Treatment System Water Quality basin (NTS), a vegetated flood protection barrier, a trail system, and dedication and improvement of an approximately 1.0 acre public active park and 0.57 acre public passive park; and subdivide approximately 4.8 acres into one (1) lot (Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15419) for open space and wetland restoration area. EPA: To amend Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 (in concept) and reduce the number of single family dwelling units to 111 units; reduce the public park to 1.57 acres; and increase the amount of open space by creating, restoring, and preserving wetlands and buffer area, a protected Eucalyptus grove, a Natural Treatment System Water Quality basin (NTS), a vegetated flood protection barrier, and a trail system. APPLICANT: A. Richard Fitch, Jr. Hunsaker & Associates 3 Hughes, Irvine, CA 92618 LOCATION: 17301 Graham Street, (west side of Graham Street, south of Warner Avenue, adjacent to the Wintersburg Flood Control Channel) DATE OF ACTION: June 1, 2009 Sister Cities: Anjo, Japan a Waitakere, New Zealand (Telephone:714-536-5227) t On Monday, June 1, 2009 the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach took action on your application and approved the Staff Recommendation for Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377(R) and 15419(R), and Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 with Findings and Conditions of Approval (attached). This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from the date of mailing of this notice to apply to the court for judicial review. Amendment to Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 is�an approval in concept and future action by the California Coastal Commission. South Coast Area Office California Coastal Commission 200 Oceangate, 10'h Floor Long Beach CA 90802-4304 (562) 570-5071 If you have any questions, please contact Scott Hess, Director of Planning at (714) 536- 5271. Sincerely, n L. Flynn, CIVIC City Clerk Enclosure: Findings and Conditions of Approval: Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 and 15419/ EPA 08-08, Action Agenda pages 2 through 5 c: Scott Hess,Director of Planning Mary Beth Broeren,Principal Planner Rami Talleh,Senior Planner FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15377 AND 15419/ ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 08-08 (AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18) (June 1, 2009) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - REVISED TENTATIVE MAP NOS. 15377 AND 15419: 1. Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 for subdivision of 45 acres into 111 single family residential lots and several lettered lots for open space and landscaped areas and Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 for the subdivision of approximately 4.8 acres into one (1) lot for open space and wetland restoration areas are consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designations on the subject property, Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan, and other applicable provisions including the provisions for Planned Unit Developments. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. The project site is generally flat and able to accommodate the type of development proposed from a circulation and drainage perspective. The site is required to be elevated in compliance with City's requirements for new construction and the Conditional Letter of Map Revision from FEMA approved June 6, 2002 and therefore, requires approximately 225,000 cubic yards of compacted fill. The proposed fill and grade will permit the site to be developed consistent with adopted plans and will result in a gross density of 4.4 units per acre (net density of 5.7 units per acre), which is below the allowable density. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The majority of the site and the entirety of the area of the development footprint has been previously used for farming and does not contain habitat for wildlife or fish. Buffers between the residential uses and areas that will be preserved as open space are included in the design of the subdivision. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. No existing easements for the public at large will be affected by the project. The project will provide public access through the site to the Public Park and public trails in the vicinity. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL— ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 08-08 (AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90): 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 for the development of 111 two-story, detached single family residential units as a Planned Unit Development (PUD), with a minimum lot size of 5,500 sq. ft., an average lot size of approximately 6,200 sq. ft., and typical 55' frontages; construction of a 1.0 acre active park, a 0.57 acre passive park and a 1.8 acre paseo park; retaining walls greater than two ft. in height; and development on a site with a grade differential of greater than three (3) feet from the low to the high point will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The project will be graded to minimize drainage impacts while complying with the flood requirements of FEMA and the City. The proposed grade differential to adjacent residential properties will be mitigated through the use of substantial landscaped setbacks and tree requirements. The project will include preservation of ESHA and the preservation and restoration of wetlands, which will be in preserved open space. The project includes significant infrastructure improvements that will have regional benefits. 2. The entitlement plan amendment will be compatible with surrounding single family residential and open space land uses. The project includes two-story homes that are similar to the surrounding developments; it also incorporates buffer areas for aesthetics and intensified landscaping. Open space areas are located adjacent to existing open space areas to maximize use and buffers. 3. The proposed project will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Variations to the wall heights are permitted by conditional use permit and lot size and width variations are allowed as part of a planned unit development. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Low Density Residential and Open Space —Conservation. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: Policy LU 9.2.1: Require that all new residential development within existing residential neighborhoods (i.e., infill) be compatible with existing structures, including the use of building heights, grade elevations, orientation and bulk that are compatible with the surrounding development. Policy LU 14.1.1: Accommodate the development of public parks, coastal and water- related recreational uses, and the conservation of environmental resources in areas designated for Open Space on the Land Use Plan Map. The proposed homes are compatible with existing homes in the area in terms of style, materials, and colors. The buildings are well articulated and will have enhanced building elevations along street frontages. The building pads are higher but there is a setback buffer along the north property line. The development will also include an approximately one acre public park and a network of trails. Furthermore, the development includes approximately 23.7 acres of land set aside for preservation of ESHA, wetlands and buffer areas. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL IN CONCEPT— ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 08-08 (AMENDMENT TO COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18: 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 for the development of a 111-unit single family residential project including park and infrastructure improvements and the preservation of ESHA, wetlands and buffer areas within an area of deferred certification in the coastal zone as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan and the Local Coastal Program. The project layout is consistent with the Low Density Residential and Open Space — Conservation land use designations on the property. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed development complies with all development standards except for the increased retaining wall heights, and the minimum lot width and size, which are allowable in the RL district through the CUP process. The development will be in compliance with City and FEMA requirements pertaining to flood protection. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. The proposed project will provide all required infrastructure consistent with the Local Coastal Program and City requirements in accordance with the project phasing plan. 4. The development conforms to the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The project will not permanently impact public access or recreation opportunities in the coastal zone; the project will add opportunities for access to surrounding trails and a proposed public park and will improve a proposed bikeway adjacent to the channel and the developed portion of the site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 15377 AND 15419: 1. Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 and Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 dated November 18, 2008, shall be the approved layout except as amended per the conditions stated herein and as follows: a. Lot No. 1 of Revised TTM 15419 shall be designated open space conservation area and shall be a part of the adjoining open space conservation area within Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15377. 2. The final map for Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 shall not be approved by the City Council until Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5(R) and General Plan Amendment No. 98-1(R) are approved and in effect, and a Local Coastal Program Amendment has been approved by the California Coastal Commission for the Implementation Plan. 3. At least 90 days before City Council action on the final maps, CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Departments of Planning, Public Works and City Attorney's office for review and approval. The CC&Rs shall include the following: a. Special provisions and guidelines for the HOA to implement, fund, and regulate the maintenance of the Public Park softscape and landscape improvements, which includes the irrigation system, lawn areas, ground cover areas, shrubs and all trees located within the Public Park (Active park area, Lot A); all common area landscaping; private drainage facilities and inlet structures; private Water Quality Treatment Systems; wetlands (existing and renaturalized); Passive Park (Lot S); emergency access road; the six foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to emergency access road linking Greenleaf Lane to Street "A"; Buffer Areas; Eucalyptus trees; bike trail links; slopes; decomposed granite walkways; open space areas along Graham Street; surface drainage for lots "B" thru "Z"; and Lots "AK, "BB", and "CC" by the Homeowner's Association (HOA). Maintenance includes all weeding, fertilizing, pest and disease control and plant replacements, the removal of non-native and/or invasive species, replacement of the original approved plant materials as required, tree trimming, irrigation adjustments, dust control/sweeping, as specified or designated structure or upkeep/ replacement equipment, and trash clean-up. The standards for maintenance shall be per the City adopted Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications and other relevant standards related to the improvements and shall include the Arboricultural maintenance section for public property for tree trimming and care within the common areas. The emergency access road shall be maintained in conformance with the City's Fire Department special design criteria and approved structural section exhibits. b. An exception shall be made in the CC&Rs to provide that the City of Huntington Beach shall maintain and be responsible for all play equipment, hardscape (concrete or hard paving) adjacent to or part of play equipment, picnic tables, gazebo and related facilities, cushioned or rubberized surfacing, sub-surface drainage features or pipes six inches or larger, benches and any hardscape related improvements or structures within the Park boundaries. c. Special provisions and guidelines to implement, fund, and regulate the maintenance of slopes, fences and retaining walls that serve as or are contiguous to flood control protection or features, except within the County Flood Control right-of-way and the vegetated flood protection feature or FEMA certified levee in lot "Y". The CC&Rs will provide that the HOA will maintain the landscaping and irrigation on the vegetated flood protection feature in lot "Y". d. Special provision to prohibit the blocking or screening of fire hydrants located in public right-of-way. e. Language that will include and reference special provisions and guidelines for funding, implementation, maintenance, monitoring, and updating of the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) including treatment train. The WQMP shall be included in the CC&Rs as an attachment or addendum for conformance with NPDES requirements. The CC&Rs shall restrict any revision or amendment of the WQMP except as may be dictated by either local, state or federal law and the City of Huntington Beach Local Implementation Plan (LIP). f. Notification to purchasers that there will be a City public park and protected open spaces within the tracts with HOA maintenance responsibilities, and that vehicular access to Greenleaf is for emergency purposes only. g. Notification to purchasers that landscaping for individual housing lots and recreation areas adjacent to an environmentally sensitive habitat area or buffer shall not include any exotic invasive plant species. h. Reference the Special Utility Easement Agreement that is required for the on- site public water system. i. The Pest Management Plan and Domestic Animal Control Plan and provide funding and implementation of a Pest Management Plan and a Domestic Animal Control Plan. j. The Homeowners Association (HOA) shall enter into a Special Utility Easement Agreement with the City of Huntington Beach for maintenance and control of the area within the (public) water pipeline easement, which shall address repair to any enhanced pavement treatment, etc., if the public water pipelines and/or appurtenances require repair or maintenance. The HOA shall be responsible for repair and replacement of any enhanced paving due to work performed by the City in the maintenance and repair of any water pipeline. The Special Utility Easement Agreement shall be referenced in the CC&Rs. (Resolution 2003-29) 4. The following conditions shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise stated. Bonding may be substituted for construction in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. (PW) a. The Final Maps shall be consistent with the approved Revised Tentative Maps. b. Vehicular access rights to all public streets, either proposed or existing, shall be released and relinquished to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the City Huntington Beach. (PW) c. The grading plan and improvement plans shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review. The engineer shall submit cost estimates for determining bond amounts. (PW) d. A final sewer design study of the project system shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The developer shall design the sewer system including replacement of the existing lift station on Graham Street, as required to serve the development and upgrade the system in conformance with the approved preliminary study and City design criteria. The City may, at its own discretion, construct the sewer lift station and associated conveyance lines to maintain temporary service of the existing station, and relocate facilities as needed to lot "B" within the development. Separate conveyance instruments for the lot and easements may be used if the lift station construction precedes recordation of the map. The developer will enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City for their fair share of the lift station improvements. (PW) e. Prior to first plan check submittal, a hydraulic water capacity analysis is required to confirm appropriate on-site sizing and layout of the public on-site water system. The City will perform the analysis based on the City's hydraulic water model. The developer must coordinate this effort with the Public Works and Fire Departments to initiate this endeavor and shall be responsible to pay the City for all related fees required to perform the analysis. (PW) f. Final hydrology and hydraulic design analysis and calculations for both on and off site drainage facilities shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The project improvements shall meet the intent of, and be consistent with or of equal effect to the facilities proposed in the Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) issued by FEMA on June 6, 2002. On-site drainage shall not be diverted or concentrated to adjacent properties, but shall be handled by a Public Works approved method. The final design analysis of the system shall be consistent with the approved preliminary studies. All pad elevations must comply with FEMA design criteria in conformance with the CLOMR (BFE 2.2 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD)) and as directed by the City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works. Gradients or flowlines less than those permitted in the City's Grading Manual shall not be permitted in earthen swales without prior approval from Public Works. (PW) g. Conservation easements shall be recorded for Lot 1 of Tract 15419 and Lots AA, BB, CC, and Z of Tract 15377. h. The following shall be shown as dedications to the City of Huntington Beach on the Final Map No. 15377 and/or Final Map No. 15419 as applicable: 1) The 1.57 acre public park (Lots "A" and "S") shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach in fee simple for parkland purposes pursuant to Section 254.08.H. of the HBZSO. The applicant shall submit to the Department of Public Works a Grant Deed, along with a preliminary title report, granting a fee ownership in the parkland unencumbered by any easements or covenants, both recorded and unrecorded, which restrict any and all uses by the City. It shall be the applicant's responsibility as part of the dedication to obtain, record, and submit all necessary quitclaims ensuring unencumbered. The designated land shall also be certified as clean in conformance with the City's Soil Clean-Up Standard, City Fire Specification 431-92, by an acceptable testing firm. Upon acceptance of the Grant Deed and the submittal of a title insurance policy in an amount equal to the appraised value of the land, the City Clerk, if granted authority as part of the acceptance of the tract map by City Council, shall record the Grant Deed for the parkland dedication. (PW) 2) The domestic water system and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans for these tracts. Easement widths shall conform with the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 600. (PW) 3) Lot "B" and the sanitary sewer system lift station, force mains and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans for these tracts. (PW) 4) The storm drain and water quality system and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans for both tracts, except those facilities designated to be maintained by the HOA as designated on the Revised tentative maps and as shown on the improvement plans and as prescribed in the CC&Rs. Easement widths shall conform with the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 300. (PW) 5) A 2.00-foot wide public utility easement along both sides of each street, per Standard Plan No. 104. (PW) 6) Graham Street for street purposes. (PW) 7) An emergency access road from Greenleaf Lane to "A" Street. The minimum width shall be 30 feet. (PW) 8) "A" Street through "F" Street for street and utility purposes. (PW) 9) An easement for public pedestrian access purposes for the two bike trails linking the flood control channel with "C" Street. 10)An easement for public access purposes 10-feet in width adjacent to or in proximity to the northerly right-of-way of"A" Street within Lots, "B", "C", "D" "O","P", "Q", "R","S", "T, "U", "V", and "W", the paseo park, passive park and open space lots (with the exception of Lot "BB"), and Lot "N" the pedestrian access lot. 11)Lot "Y" in fee simple for flood control and levee purposes. Lot"Y" may also be dedicated to the County of Orange if the Orange County Flood Control District agrees to accept it for these purposes. 12) Lot "X" in fee simple for water quality purposes. i. All street lighting shall be conveyed to Southern California Edison Co. for maintenance and operation. (PW) j. A reproducible mylar copy and print of the final tract map shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works at the time of recordation. (PW) k. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall comply with Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18 for the following items: (PW) 1) Tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor. 2) Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the County of Orange. 1. Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the City per the following criteria: Design Specification: 1) Digital data shall be full size (1:1) and in compliance with the California coordinate system — STATEPLANE Zone 6 (Lambert Conformal Conic projection), NAD 83 datum in accordance with the County of Orange Ordinance 3809. 2) Digital data shall have double precision accuracy (up to fifteen significant digits). 3) Digital data shall have units in US FEET. 4) A separate drawing file shall be submitted for each individual sheet. 5) Digital data shall be in compliance with the Huntington Beach Standard Sheets, drawing names, pen color and layering conventions. 6) Feature compilation shall include, but shall not be limited to: Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN), street addresses and street names with suffix. File Format and Media Specification: 7) Shall be in compliance with the following file format: y AutoCAD (version 13 or later) drawing file: _.DWG 8) Shall be in compliance with the following media type: �;, CD Recordable (CD-R) 650 Megabytes m. No construction traffic or vehicle access shall be taken from or to Greenleaf for any purpose other than emergency vehicle access. Any future connection of Greenleaf to the development for public street purposes or private access shall be prohibited until otherwise conveyed through a public hearing process before the City Council. n. A Certificate of Insurance shall be filed with the Department of Public Works and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW) o. All improvement securities (Faithful Performance, Labor & Material and Monumentation Bonds) and Subdivision Agreement shall be posted with the Department of Public Works and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW) 5. The following conditions are required to be completed prior to issuance of Precise Grading Permits: a. A Precise Grading Plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Final grades and elevations on the grading plan shall not vary by more than one (1) foot from the grades and elevations on the approved Tentative Map unless otherwise required by these conditions and shall conform to FEMA requirements for elevation above the flood water levels as directed by the Department of Public Works. The recommendations from Section 7.0 and 8.0 of the geotechnical study, Appendix E of the EIR, shall be incorporated into the earthwork activities. (MM) The recommendations of the report in Appendix E shall be augmented or superseded where necessary by the updated Geotechnical Study, dated November 25, 2008. The following public improvements shall be shown on the plan: i. Class I bike trail and adjacent lot slopes along the channel. (PW) ii. Two bike trails linking the flood control channel with "C" Street. iii. All slopes, walls, and drainage control devices. (PW) iv. The owner shall submit a "Notice of Intent" (NOI), along with the required fee, to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in compliance with NPDES general construction permit requirements. Copies of the NOI and the written replies received from the SWRCB shall be submitted to the City. (PW-MM) b. A sewer lateral shall be provided for each habitable lot per city standards. (PW) c. All structures over twenty feet (20') in height from the point of connection at the public water source shall require a backflow protection device on the domestic water service unless otherwise approved by the Water Division. (PW) d. Separate irrigation services, meters and backflow devices shall be required for any Homeowner Association (HOA) landscaping. The softscape portion of the Public Park, (Lot "A" Active Park and Lot "S" Passive Park), shall be included and tied with the irrigation service to the HOA common area landscape. (PW) e. Each proposed dwelling unit shall require a separate domestic water meter and service. All domestic water meters shall be sized in accordance with the California Plumbing Code (CPC) and the requirements of the City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works and the Fire Department. (PW/FD) f. Plans for EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS at Greenleaf/LOT A shall be submitted and approved by the Fire and Planning Departments. The plans shall indicate gate location, method to secure, slope, and overall final elevation change along and adjacent to the alignment. (FD) g. Final finished grade for the park shall be subject to the approval of the Departments of Public Works and Community Services. The final finished grade shall, at a minimum: i. Protect existing trees, meet police department visibility requirements, provide proper drainage, meet conditions for maintaining a playable park and a passive park and if necessary provide a drainage interceptor at the toe of the existing slope that transports run off to the storm drain system prior to entering the playable park area except as required to maintain buffer or conservation areas and landscaping. (PW) ii. The finish grade in the City park site shall be raised with a City approved topsoil. (PW) iii. The slope of the Public Park pad, (Lot "A" Active Park), shall drain either toward the Naturalized Meadow Grass area or to B Street. The minimum accepted slope for drainage shall be as allowed by the City's Grading Manual. There shall be a low berm (18" to 30" high as measured vertically from the sidewalk), or a slope up to B Street of the same height along the back of sidewalk of B Street with the side slopes graded to a maximum of 5:1. The drainage of the lot if toward B Street, shall drain through under sidewalk drainage structures. Said walkway locations shall be designed so that any concentrated water drain-ways shall not erode the decomposed granite walkway. If the drainage is toward the Naturalized Meadow Grass area there shall be no heavily concentrated flow areas, and the water shall be directed away from the Tot Lot, Gazebo and Swing Set area. (PW) iv. The gradient and configuration of the emergency access road shall be approved by Public Works and Fire. (PW/FD) h. The Developer shall design and construct a new wet well/dry well sewer lift station and force main as required by the City to replace the existing station in Graham. The new station shall be sized to accommodate existing and the proposed development flows. The existing station shall be abandoned in- place by the developer as directed by The Department of Public Works. The used pumps/controllers shall be returned to the City Yard. The design of the lift station shall comply with all design requirements and criteria of the City of Huntington Beach. The City may, at its own discretion, construct the sewer lift station and associated conveyance lines to maintain temporary service of the existing station and relocate facilities as needed to Lot "B" within the development. (PW) i. The Developer shall submit a Hazard Mitigation and Flood Protection Plan to the City of Huntington Beach for review and approval. (4K) j. The Developer shall design and construct the ultimate improvements to the north levee of the East Garden Grove -Wintersburg Channel (C05) per County of Orange Flood Control District's adopted design standards (sheet pile and cathodic protection, or an equivalent lining if approved by the County). Said channel improvements shall be constructed from the westerly right of way of Graham Street to the westerly edge of the vegetated flood protection feature. Requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers where appropriate, and the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) shall be observed in the design and construction of all channel and abutting slope improvements in and adjacent to the channel. A cooperative agreement between OCFD and the Developer shall be completed for any cost sharing, special design criteria, or conditions of the work to be undertaken prior to the issuing of a grading permit. (PW) k. The Developer shall remove the existing oil-field access bridge over the C05 channel westerly of the Slater Pump Station, unless otherwise directed by the Orange County Flood Control District. (PW) I. The Developer shall install two (2) new pump systems (motor, pump, controls, heat exchanger, and necessary appurtenances) within the existing vacant pump bays, or shall replace existing pump systems to equal the proposed efficiency and pumping capacity of the existing plus two new pump systems in the Slater Pump Station as determined necessary by the City Engineer (equipment to match/equal City specification). Subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, a request for fee credits may be considered for improvements exceeding the developer's required project impact mitigation. For purposes of fee credit, the value of each existing pump bay to be utilized shall be considered to be $300,000 unless it is proven to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to be a different amount. The developer will be required to make capacity improvements to the system as necessary to drain the subject development and tributary flows to the site as required by the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall also obtain necessary written approvals from the County of Orange and other pertinent agencies as required prior to issuance of grading permits. (PW) m. The Developer shall design and construct off-site drainage improvements as required by the Department of Public Works to mitigate impact of increased runoff, as well as conveyance of ultimate upstream flows or deficient, downstream drainage systems. Design of all necessary drainage improvements shall provide mitigation for all rainfall event frequencies up to a 100-year frequency. The Developer shall provide the necessary hydrologic and hydraulic studies as required to justify final pad elevations on the site in conformance with the latest FEMA requirements, and provide any needed data to update that portion of the City's Master Plan of Drainage to reflect the changes and improvements of this project in the plan. The vegetated flood protection feature (lot "Y") shall conform to the FEMA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Design Guidelines (most specifically USACOE Manual EM 1110-2- 1913.) Among the items of design criteria to be included are the following: (PW) i. The top of levee or vegetated flood protection feature shall be wide enough to accommodate a minimum 12-foot wide clear access for maintenance vehicles. Drainage swales and flow lines along the brow of the levee shall not be within the 12-foot travel area. If walls are incorporated into the design, drainage swale flow lines shall be a minimum of 18-inches from the wall and shall be concrete gutters or other compatible structure or device to minimize erosion behind the wall. ii. The waterside of the levee shall be 2:1 or steeper with riprap or similar slope protection, or flatter than 2:1 without hard slope protection. Walls in combination with slopes may be used as approved by the City. iii. The landside of the levee shall be 2:1 or steeper with riprap or similar slope protection, or flatter than 2:1 without hard slope protection to minimize seepage and permit easy maintenance. iv. The levee design shall include a seepage barrier. If sheet piles are employed, no seepage barrier is required. Transitions from exposed sheet piling to earthen berms shall be concrete lined or an approved alternative. V. A vehicle turnaround with a turning radius or hammerhead design consistent with the wheel base criteria of maintenance vehicles shall be provided at the end of the levee or vegetated flood protection feature maintenance road within lot "Y" in a manner approved by the Department of Public Works. vi. The road surface on the top of levee or vegetated flood protection feature shall maintain a minimum elevation of 13.6 feet as shown on the approved Tentative Map or a minimum 1-foot of freeboard above the committed water surface elevation in the channel, whichever is greater. The top of levee or vegetated flood protection feature shall tie into the existing topography to prohibit a breach or intrusion into the subdivision from seawater high tide events or storm flows. (PW) n. Storm Drain Improvement Plans, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) conforming with the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The WQMP shall also be submitted to Orange County Coastkeeper for review and comment. (PW) i. To the greatest extent feasible, low flow urban runoff from Cabo del Mar shall be directed to a gross pollutant removal device. ii. Gross pollutant removal devices (CDS or equivalent) for the removal of debris, sediment, oil and water separation, etc., shall be installed as part of the treatment train for the main line systems. Access to these devices for maintenance shall be provided and included within an easement to the City. iii. The developer shall design and construct a low flow urban runoff treatment train for partial flows from the Slater Pump Station, which may be conveyed to the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel (C05). iv. A SWPPP shall be prepared and updated as needed during the course of construction to satisfy the requirements of each phase of the development. The plan shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMP's) and other City requirements to eliminate polluted runoff until all construction work for the project is completed. V. A WQMP shall be prepared, maintained and updated as needed to satisfy the requirements of the adopted NPDES program and the City of Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program. The plan shall incorporate water quality measures for all improved or unimproved phases of the project. All structural BMP's shall be sized to infiltrate, filter, or treat the 85-percentile 24-hour storm event or the maximum flow rate of runoff produced from a rainfall intensity of 0.2 inches per hour. The WQMP shall include an extensive Home Owner's Association education program, including information booklets and packages for each homeowner, and periodic informational programs to keep owners current with WQMP practices and requirements. (PW/4K) o. A Funding agreement or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for a pro-rata share of the maintenance and replacement of the public water quality treatment train shall be completed between the City of Huntington Beach and the developer prior to recordation of the final map and prior to the issuance of precise grading permits. The agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the CC&Rs of the development. p. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan, prepared by a Licensed Landscape Architect, shall be submitted to the Departments of Public Works and Planning for review and approval. The Landscape Construction Set shall identify the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials; an irrigation plan; a grading plan; an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The plan for non-Open Space-Conservation areas shall prohibit the planting, naturalization or persistence of invasive plants and shall encourage low-water use plants, and plants primarily native to coastal Orange County. The plan shall include irrigation demands to ensure proper irrigation service sizing. (PW/4K) q. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, applicable Design Guidelines, and the Local Coastal Program. The plan shall include all common areas, the proposed active and passive City Park, Graham Street setback area, and the paseo park. The paseo park along the north property line shall include intensified landscaping to further screen possible headlight intrusion. (PW/MM/Code Requirement) r. A Habitat Management Plan shall be prepared for all areas designated Open Space- Conservation, which shall include restoration, enhancement and perpetual conservation and management of delineated wetlands, wetland and habitat mitigation, and establishment of appropriate buffers from development. The Plan shall be submitted to the Departments of Public Works and Planning for review and approval. (41K) s. An erosion control and silt control plan for all water runoff during construction and site preparation work shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. (PW/MINI) t. Street Improvement Plans for improvements to Graham Street shall be prepared per the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 103, (to 80764' standard), and submitted for review and approval. The developer shall include the following modifications to achieve the minimum number of travel lanes specified and include any additional striping modifications identified by the Transportation Manager to best accommodate specific traffic operations (PW/MM): i. Improve Graham Street along the project frontage, as needed, to correct the stopping sight distance and stacking problems between the crosswalk across Graham at Street "A" and the crest of the Wintersburg Channel Bridge as approved by the Department of Public Works. ii. Restripe Graham Street from Street "A" to Glenstone Drive with a seven (7) foot bike lane in each direction, one twelve (12) foot through lane in each direction, and a fourteen (14) foot painted two-way left turn median. (MM) iii. Restripe Graham Street northerly from Street "A" as directed by the Department of Public Works, to transition with a seven (7) foot bike lane in each direction, one eighteen (18) foot through lane in each direction, and a fourteen (14) foot painted two-way left turn median. A protected left turn pocket on Graham Street, (northbound to westbound) shall be provided with appropriate tapers in accordance with the design speed, (50 mph). Signage shall be added to the intersection of Graham Street and Kenilworth Drive to keep intersection clear. (MM) iv. The developer shall design and install signing and striping plans in accordance with Public Works Standards u. Internal public streets shall be designed and constructed as follows (PW): i. All street grades shall have a minimum gradient of 0.50%. ii. Street "A" ("Entry Street") shall be designed and constructed per the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 104 modified, (56736'). A dedicated left turn lane and dedicated right turn lane (within 26' from median island to outer curb face) exiting onto Graham Street shall be provided. A 15-foot wide median island shall be constructed at the entry. No parking or driveway openings will be permitted on Street "A" from Graham Street to the end of lot "C". iii. Streets "B" thru "F," shall be designed and constructed per the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 104 Modified, (48'/36'). iv. Parking layout shall conform to City Standards and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code requirements, including Municipal Ordinance No. 10.40.050. Thirty (30) parking spaces shall be provided for park parking above the count required for residential lot guest parking. No on-street parking shall be permitted adjacent to emergency access areas in compliance with Fire Department Standard Specification 401 and 415. V. Curb, gutter and sidewalk along all street frontages, per City Standard Plan Nos. 202 and 207. vi. An ADA compliant access ramp at the corners of all street intersections, and where required by Federal and State code. v. Access for the handicapped in conformance with Title 24, shall be provided from the public sidewalk into the public park at the northerly and southerly ends. w. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Transportation Manager that standards (including ADA) regarding pedestrian/bicycle safety along the perimeter sidewalks will be met. (MM) x. The Developer shall design and install Southern California Edison owned street lighting. The plan shall include the height, location, and intensity of streetlights on-site. Street light spacing shall be in conformance with City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan 411. (PW/MiM) y. A traffic signal shall be designed and constructed for the intersection of Street "A" and Graham Street. (MM) Z. The traffic signal shall be hard-wire interconnected with the existing traffic signal at Warner Avenue and Graham Street per Public Works Standards and Specifications. (PW) aa. Traffic Control Plans, prepared by a Licensed Civil or Traffic Engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval, for work within the City's right-of-way. (PW) bb. A licensed engineer shall prepare a detailed soils and geological/seismic analysis. This analysis shall provide detailed recommendations for grading, over excavation, engineered fill, dewatering, settlement, monitoring, protection of adjacent existing structures, landscaping, chemical and fill properties, liquefaction requirements, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. Said report shall also provide recommendations to certify that post development ground water conditions shall not be affected or affect improvements. The report will provide recommendations for rough and precise grading. The developer shall provide a minimum of four (4) agricultural soil tests for fertility and suitability within the park area prior to developing a finish-grading plan. In addition, a geotechnical expert shall be on-site daily during dewatering to monitor soil conditions. A diminimus permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board shall be required. (PW) cc. If soil remediation is required, a remediation plan shall be submitted to the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments for review and approval in accordance with City Specifications No. 431-92 and the conditions of approval. The plan shall include methods to minimize remediation-related impacts on the surrounding properties; details on how all drainage associated with the remediation efforts shall be retained on site and no wastes or pollutants shall escape the site; and shall also identify wind barriers around remediation equipment. (PW) dd. Soil imported for the park area shall be approved by the City Landscape Architect. The developer shall employ a soil test lab approved by the City Landscape Architect to obtain and test soils that are to be utilized in raising the grade of the proposed park area. After a topsoil source is approved, the developer shall guarantee that said soil is delivered to the site and used on the park. (PW) ee. For import soils, the project shall comply with all provisions of the HBMC Section 17.04.085 and Fire Dept. City Specification 429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. (FD) ff. Provide proof that all site soil meets the requirements found in the City of Huntington Beach Soil Cleanup Standard, City Specification No. 431-92. (FD) gg. The Fire Department must be notified of who will be the environmental site auditor supervising testing operations during soil import. The selected environmental firm is responsible for obtaining Fire Department approval for their testing plan. (FD) hh. The name and phone number of an on-site field supervisor hired by the developer shall be submitted to the Departments of Planning and Public Works. In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on Graham Street every 250 feet, and at Greenleaf Lane indicating who shall be contacted for information regarding this development and any construction/grading- related concerns. This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity. He/She will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities, dust control, water quality, truck routes, construction hours, noise, etc. Signs shall include the applicant's contact number, City contact (Construction Manager (714) 536-5431) regarding grading and construction activities, and "1-800-CUTSMOG" in the event there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No. 403. (PW) ii. The applicant shall notify all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property of a tentative grading schedule at least 30 days prior to any such grading. (PW) jj. The developer shall coordinate with the Department of Public Works, Transportation Division in developing a truck and construction vehicle routing plan. This plan shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur, restrict heavy equipment and haul trucks from arriving and leaving the site to between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. during the school year, and specify methods to mitigate construction related impacts to adjacent residents. These plans must be submitted for approval to the Department of Public Works. Staging of trucks shall occur on-site. (PW/MM) kk. A grading/erosion and dust control plan shall be completed and must abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control; and provide a plan to the Department of Public Works indicating such compliance. (PW) II. Block wall/fencing plans (including a site plan, section drawings, and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls, walls, and fences) consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage. Double walls shall be prohibited. Protective fencing or barriers shall be installed along any interface with developed areas to deter human and pet entrance into all restored and preserved wetland and ESHA buffer areas. (41K) mm. If grading occurs during the normal breeding season for the red-tailed hawk and other raptors locally, (February 15 through August 31), a survey shall be conducted for active nests. Should active nests be located within the zone of potential disturbance due to grading or construction activities, work shall be limited to areas 500 feet away from the nest until the young have fledged and have begun foraging away from the nest site. The 500- foot protection zone shall be fenced with visible warning-color materials. Nest trees shall be removed during the non-breeding season only. (MM/4K) nn. The property owner shall conduct a subsurface test investigation for CA- ORA-1308 and 1309 to determine the horizontal boundaries of the sites as well as to confirm the surface conclusions of non-significance as indicated in the March, 1997 Archeological Assessment. This may be accomplished though the mechanical excavation of a number of auger holes as well as two (2) 1x1 meter hand excavated units for stratigraphic control. The subsurface test investigation (including a discussion of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of resources), final mitigation recommendations and cost estimates shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. (MM/4K) oo. The applicant shall create, if deemed necessary through Condition No. 5(kk), a cultural resource management plan based on the subsurface test results. A full data recovery program shall be designed if site avoidance is not feasible through design. Possible recovery plans include, but are not limited to preservation, salvage, partial salvage, or no mitigation necessary. The plan shall include conservation with the appropriate Native American Organization and be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. Additionally, the plan shall require peer review in conformance with the Coastal Commission's Archeological Guidelines. (MM) pp. The property owner shall provide written evidence that a certified archaeologist has been retained and shall be present at the pre-grading meeting/conference, shall establish procedures for archaeological resource surveillance, and shall establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification and evaluation of the artifacts as appropriate. The archaeological resource surveillance procedures shall include a provision for Native American review of grading operations. If additional or unexpected archaeological features are discovered, the archeologist shall report such findings to the applicant and to the Planning Department and the appropriate Native American Organization. If the archaeological resources are found to significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the applicant, for exploration and/or salvage. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. (MM/4K) qq. A bikeway plan shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach's Departments of Planning and Public Works, in consultation with the Manager of the County PFRD/HBP Program Management and Coordination, for approval of consistency with the Orange County Bikeway Plan. (MM) rr. A Public Access Plan shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach's Departments of Planning and Public Works and shall be coordinated with and include the bikeway plan. (41K) ss. The applicant shall submit and have approved a noise mitigation plan to the Department of Planning that will reduce or mitigate short-term noise impacts to nearby noise sensitive. The plan shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance and shall include, but not be limited to (MM): 1) Criteria of acceptable noise levels based on type and length of exposure to construction noise levels; 2) Physical reduction measures such as temporary noise barriers that provide separation between the source and the receptor; temporary soundproof structures to house portable generators; and 3) Temporary generators (if utilized) shall be located as far as practical from sensitive noise receptors. 4) Mitigation measures such as restrictions on the time of construction for activities resulting in high noise levels. tt. The applicant shall be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion into the project grading permit. Measures, subject to the approval and verification by the Department of Public Works, shall include, as appropriate (MM): 1) Provision of rideshare incentives. 2) Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. 3) Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. 4) Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. 5) Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. uu. The applicant shall produce evidence acceptable to the City Engineer that: (MM) 1) All grading and construction vehicles and equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation. 2) Stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. 3) Operations shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. vv. The applicant shall produce evidence (specifications) acceptable to the City Engineer that the new wall along Graham Street (along the project's boundary adjacent to proposed homes on Graham Street) will be constructed to achieve maximum sound attenuation. (MM) ww. The recommendations contained in the geotechnical study, located in Appendix E of the EIR, shall be incorporated into the earthwork activities of the proposed project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Earthwork activities include all grading, clearing and demolition, site preparation, unsuitable soil removals, backcuts, excavation processing, compaction of all fills, mixing, benching, inspection, survey control, subgrade preparation, cut and fill slope construction, haul roads, import soils, structural load and settlement/subsidence measures, and storm drain relocation. (MM). The recommendations of the report in Appendix E shall be augmented or superseded where necessary by the updated Geotechnical Study, dated November 25, 2008. xx. The applicant shall contract with a dewatering expert to prepare a detailed Dewatering Plan. This plan shall include the placement of monitoring wells near the northern property line to evaluate ground water levels during the proposed project dewatering activities. The dewatering activities shall be adjusted immediately if the monitoring wells show ground water level changes which may affect subsidence of adjacent properties. The Dewatering Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. (MM) yy. A Phase II environmental soil sampling shall be conducted to determine the residual levels of pesticides in the soil. If inappropriate/unsafe levels per County Health Department standards are identified by this analysis, "clean up" measures shall be recommended and implemented. The Phase II sampling and any necessary measures shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. (MM) zz. The applicant shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan showing conformance to the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and all NPDES requirements (enacted by the EPA) for review and approval by the City Engineer. The plan shall reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practical using management practices, control techniques and systems, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions which are appropriate. (MM) aaa. The applicant shall be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles be equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. (MM bbb. The developer shall submit a hydraulic computer water model analysis for the development proposed, which addresses the following: 1) Water demand required by project (including fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Department) 2) Master Plan/General Plan Amendment (GPA) review for consistency. 3) The City of Huntington Beach Water (Master Plan) System Computer Model (i.e. H2ONET) must be run with the proposed land use demands (i.e. GPA), and contrasted with the model run using the existing land use demands, (i.e. the General Plan, in effect at the time the Water Master Plan was adopted). 4) The City of Huntington Beach Water Division must be contracted to perform this analysis using the existing City of Huntington Beach Water System Model, for a fee to be paid by the developer a minimum of 30 days in advance. If the analysis shows that project demands cannot be met with the City's current water system, the developer shall be required to upgrade the City's system to meet the demands and/or otherwise mitigate the impacts of the project at no cost to the City. (NISI) ccc. Irrigation systems within the Park and the open space areas, which minimize water waste, shall be used to the greatest extent possible. Such measures should involve, where appropriate, the following features: 1) Raised planters and berming in conjunction with closely spaced low volume, low angle (22 % degree) sprinkler heads. 2) Drip irrigation 3) Irrigation systems controlled automatically to ensure watering during early morning or evening hours to reduce evaporation losses. 4) Temporary irrigation systems for wetland restoration are excluded from these provisions. 6. During demolition, grading, site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available to be used throughout the day during site grading and construction to keep the soil damp enough to prevent dust being raised by the operations and when leaving the site. Wet the area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust pick up by the wind; spread soil binders; and implement street sweeping as necessary. (MM) b. All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 7:00 a.m. (8:00 a.m. during the school year) or leave the site no later than 8:00 p.m., and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only. (PW) c. During construction, the area shall be wet down in the late morning and after work is completed for the day (MM). d. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose substances and building materials shall be covered, or to maintain a minimum freeboard of two feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. (MM) e. Install vehicle wheel-washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites. Prior to leaving the site, wheels of all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site on a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets. Install vehicle wheel-washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites. (MINI) f. Where feasible, pervious paving materials shall be used to reduce surface water runoff. (MM) g. Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas. (PW) h. Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site. (PW) i. The remediation operations shall be performed in stages concentrating in single areas at a time to minimize the impact of fugitive dust and noise on the surrounding areas. (PW) j. Comply with the "Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan" and "Water Quality Management Plan" requirements. (PW) k. Discovery of additional contamination/pipelines, etc., must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly. Discovery of contaminated soil and/or abandoned oil wells require immediate fire department notification. All project processes in the immediate discovery area shall cease until approved plans are in place. (FD) I. Construction equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation, maintain equipment engines in proper tune. Truck idling shall be prohibited for periods longer than 10 minutes. (MM) m. Use low sulfur(0.05% by weight) fuel by weight for construction equipment. (MM) n. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. (MM) o. A phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily emissions shall be complied with. Treat unattended construction areas with water(disturbed lands which have been, or are expected to be unused for four or more consecutive days). Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. (MM) p. The planting of vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on construction sites shall be required. Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion from storm water especially on super pads. (MM) q. On-site parking shall be provided for all construction workers and equipment unless approved otherwise by the Department of Public Works. No Parking will be permitted in restricted area and on Graham Street. (PW) r. Enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of sand, dirt, or other aggregate materials shall be required. (MM) s. The construction disturbance area shall be kept as small as possible. Control off-road vehicle travel by posting driving speed limits on these roads, consistent with City standards. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators when practical. The applicant shall be responsible for assuring that vehicle movement on any unpaved surface other than water trucks shall be terminated if wind speeds exceed 15 mph. (MM) t. Compliance with all Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code requirements including the Noise Ordinance. All activities including truck deliveries associated with construction, grading, remodeling, or repair shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. All heavy equipment shall arrive or leave the site no earlier than 8:00 A.M. and no later than 8:00 PM during the school year. Such activities are prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. (Code Requirement) u. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/ grading activity. v. The property owner is responsible for all required clean up of off-site dirt, pavement damage and/or restriping of the public rights-of-way as determined by the Department of Public Works. (PW) w. The property owner shall be responsible for paving all access aprons to the project site and for the maintenance of the paving. (MM) x. The property owner shall be responsible for incorporating measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion with the implementation of rideshare incentives, transit incentives, construction area parking, use of flagmen, and implementation of measures to minimize the obstruction of through traffic lanes, as deemed appropriate by Public Works. (MM) y. The project shall provide easy access into and within the project site for emergency vehicles and addresses shall be well marked to facilitate response by officers. Prior to the first final inspection, project site plans depicting these requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Police Department. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS — REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 15377 & 15419: 1. Revised Tentative Map Nos. 15377 and 15419 shall be valid for two (2) years of the date of final approval which is from the time the Local Coastal Program Amendment and Coastal Development Permit for the area is deemed certified by the California Coastal Commission. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 60 days prior to the expiration date. 2. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 3. All applicable fees shall be paid from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments fees prior to map recordation. (PW) 4. All new and existing overhead utilities shall be installed underground in accordance with the City's Underground Utility Ordinance. In addition, all electrical transformers shall be installed underground. Aboveground transformers may be allowed due to certain groundwater conditions locations and shall be approved by the City Engineer and City Landscape Architect. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 08-08 (AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18): 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated January 21, 2009 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way. Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. (Code Requirement) b. Individual building site plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Departments of Planning and Public Works. The final building layout shall be within the building envelope as depicted on the Building Envelope Plan. (MM) c. Depict the location of all gas meters, water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units, mailboxes (as approved by the United States Postal Service), and similar items on the site plan and elevations. If located on a building, they shall be architecturally designed into the building to appear as part of the building. They shall be architecturally compatible with the building and non- obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required setbacks. d. If outdoor lighting is included, energy saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. (MM) Street lighting, exterior residential lighting and park lighting, if any, adjacent to ESHA and buffer areas shall be limited in intensity and shielded in order to minimize impacts to these areas. e. Non-reflective materials shall be utilized to the extent feasible. Individual building site plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Public Works Department. (MM) 2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. Submit three (3) copies of the site plan and floor plans and the processing fee to the Planning Department for addressing purposes after street name approval by the Fire Department. (FD) c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) d. To maintain required emergency access and site safety during project construction phases, submit a Fire Protection Plan in compliance with City Specification #426-Fire Safety Requirements for Construction Sites, or other City Specifications approved by the City Fire Department. (FD) e. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification #401- Minimum Access for Fire Department Access, or as approved by the City Fire Department. Fire Access Roads shall be provided and maintained in compliance with City Specification #401, Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access. Driving area shall be capable of supporting a fire apparatus (75,000 Ibs and 12,000 lb point load). Fire Access Road Turns and Corners shall be designed with a minimum inner radius of seventeen feet (17') and a minimum outer radius of forty five feet (45') per City Specification #401 Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access. For Fire Department approval, reference and demonstrate compliance with City Specification # 401 Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access on the plans. (FD) f. Fire hydrants must be installed and be in service before combustible construction begins. Shop drawings shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Fire Department. Indicate hydrant locations and fire department connections. The number, spacing and location of all fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Fire Department and the Public Works Water Division. (FD) g. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed throughout each unit. For Fire Department approval, plans shall be submitted to the Building Department as separate plans for permits (FD). h. A fire alarm system in compliance with Huntington Beach Fire Code is required. For Fire Department approval, shop drawings shall be submitted to Building as separate plans for permits. The system shall provide water flow, tamper, and trouble alarms, manual pull stations, interior and exterior horns and strobes, voice communication, and 24-hour central station monitoring. (FD) i. Street names must be approved by the Fire Department. Please refer to City Specification #409-Street Naming Process, Public or Private. (FD) j. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a Licensed Soils Engineer and submitted with the building permit application. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding: grading, foundations, retaining walls, streets, utilities, and chemical and fill properties of underground items including buried pipe and concrete and the protection thereof.(BD) k. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g- factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. (Code Requirement) I. Floor plans shall depict natural gas stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters and central heating units. m. Contact the United States Postal Service for approval of mailbox location(s). n. The recommendations contained in the geotechnical study, located in Appendix E of the EIR shall be incorporated into the structural design of the proposed project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Structural design activities include: Foundation Design; Settlements including Foundation Loads and Seismically Induced Settlements; Post-Tensioned Slab/ Foundations; Mat Foundations; Other Foundation Recommendations such as Footing Embedment, Underslab Treatment, and Subgrade Moisture Content; Concrete Driveways, Sidewalks, and Flatwork; Structural Setbacks; Retaining Walls; Other Design and Construction Recommendations such as Lot Drainage, Utility Excavations, Utility Trench Backfill, Corrosion, Metallic Structures, and Concrete Structures.(MM) The recommendations of the report in Appendix E shall be augmented or superseded where necessary by the updated Geotechnical Study, dated November 25, 2008. o. It shall be proven to the City that all structures are designed in accordance with the seismic design provisions of the latest California Building Code in effect in Huntington Beach to promote safety in the event of an earthquake.(MM) p. Building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. If during the Fire Department's plan check it becomes evident that fire ground operations will become impeded, the department will impose additional fire code requirements in addition to the automatic sprinkler systems, alarm systems, access roads, etc. (MM) q. The applicant shall consult with the Police Department during preliminary stages of the project design to review the safety features, determine their adequacy, and suggest improvements. (MM) r. The applicant shall consult with the Water Division and Park, Tree and Landscape Division of the Public Works Department during design and construction of the Park for further water conservation measures to review irrigation designs and drought tolerant plant use, as well as measures that may be incorporated into the project to reduce peak hour water demand. (MM) 3. The following conditions shall be completed prior to issuance of Building Permits: a. Submit a copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file to the Planning Department; and submit 8 inch by 10 inch colored photographs of all colored renderings, elevations, materials sample board, and massing model to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file. b. A precise grading permit shall be issued. (PW) c. The final Tract Maps shall be recorded with the County of Orange and a copy filed with the Planning Department. (PW/Code Requirement) d. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials; an irrigation plan; a grading plan; an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The plan shall include all common areas, the proposed City Park, Graham Street setback area, and the paseo park. The paseo park along the north property line shall include intensified landscaping to further screen possible headlight intrusion. In addition, Revised TTM 15419 shall consist of non-invasive, native drought tolerant or wetland plant material without a permanent irrigation system. (PW) e. The Consulting Arborist (approved by the City Landscape Architect) shall review the final landscape tree planting plan and approve in writing the selection and locations proposed for new trees and the protection measures and locations of existing trees to remain. Existing trees to remain shall also be addressed by said Arborist with recommendations/requirements for protection during construction. Said Arborist report shall be incorporated onto the Landscape Architect's plans as construction notes and/or construction requirements. The report shall include the Arborist's name, certificate number and the Arborist's wet signature on the final plan. (PW) f. An interim parking and building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department to assure adequate parking and restroom facilities are available for employees, customers and contractors during the project's construction phase and that adjacent properties will not be impacted by their location. The plan shall also be reviewed and approved by the Departments of Fire and Public Works. The applicant shall obtain any necessary encroachment permits from the Department of Public Works. (PW) g. The project applicant shall implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding storm drainage improvements which shall include, but not be limited to (MM): 1) Construct the necessary storm drainage improvements (identified on Exhibit 42 within the EIR) to handle increased flows and intercept off-site flows. 2) Ensure that future building pads are placed at elevations suitable to withstand 100-year flood. 3) Construct the necessary improvements to the East Garden Grove — Wintersburg Channel (C05) along the site perimeter from the westerly Graham Street right of way to the westerly edge of the vegetated flood protection feature. h. The applicant shall show proof of compliance with the Mitigation Agreement established between the Huntington Beach Union High School District, subject to the approval of the City of Huntington Beach. (MM) i. Pervious paving material shall be used whenever feasible to reduce surface water runoff and aid in groundwater recharge and slopes and grades shall be controlled to discourage water waste through runoff. (MM) j. The property owner shall construct the new sewer lift station and force main in accordance with the City-approved Sewer Plan for the proposed project, and implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding sewer infrastructure improvements to handle increased sewer flow demands. (MM) k. The Southern California Gas Company or designated natural gas provider shall be consulted with during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. (MM) I. SCE shall be consulted with during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. (MM) m. The applicant shall provide proof of incorporation of City comments and/or conditions related to the overall proposed design and layout of buildings and landscaping. The Design and layout of buildings shall be approved by the Planning Department. (MM) 4. With the exception of model homes, structure(s) cannot be occupied, the final building permit(s) cannot be approved, and utilities cannot be released for the first residential unit until the following has been completed: a. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed. (PW) b. Landscape irrigation and planting installation shall be certified to be in conformance to the City approved landscape plans by the Landscape Architect of Record in written form to the City Landscape Architect prior to the final landscape inspection and approval. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed. (PW) c. A Pest Management Plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Huntington Beach that, at a minimum, prohibits the use of rodenticides, and restricts the use of pesticides, and herbicides in outdoor areas, except necessary Vector Control conducted by the City or County. (41K) d. A Domestic animal control plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Huntington Beach that details methods to be used to prevent pets from entering the Open Space-Conservation areas. (41K) e. The Developer shall provide, in connection with the sale of each housing unit within the development, an information packet that explains the sensitivity of the natural habitats within or adjacent to the project site and the need to minimize impacts on the designated ESHA and buffer areas and the prohibition on landscaping that includes exotic invasive plant species on lots that are directly adjacent to an ESHA or buffer area. The information packet shall include a copy of the Domestic Animal Control Plan and Pest Management Plan. f. The applicant shall provide proof that energy saving features have been installed in project homes as required by the California Building Code. Features may include: solar or low-emission water heaters, energy efficient appliances, double- glass paned windows, low-sodium parking lights, etc. (MM) g. The public park shall be completed at the request of 50% occupancy (or by the 55th home Certificate of Occupancy). (PW) h. All public infrastructure must be completed per the approved improvement plans. (PW) i. All improvements must be completed per the approved grading improvement plans. (PW) j. The applicant shall be responsible for improving Graham Street in accordance with the approved signing and striping plan. (PW/MM) k. Applicant shall provide the City with Microfilm copies (in City format) and CD (AutoCAD only) copy of complete City approved landscape construction drawings as stamped "Permanent File Copy" prior to starting landscape work. Copies shall be given to the City Landscape Architect for permanent City record. (PW) 1. Automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed throughout. Shop drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to system installation. (FD) m. Fire hydrants must be installed before combustible construction begins. Prior to installation, shop drawings shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department. (Fire Dept. City Specification 407) (FD) n. Backflow protection shall be constructed per the Huntington Beach Water Division Standards Plans for irrigation and fire suppression water services. o. Address numbers shall be installed on structures to comply with Fire Dept. City Specification 428. (FD) p. Secondary emergency access gates must be secured with KNOX and association (if any) hardware. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with Fire Dept. City Specification 401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. Fire lanes will be designated and posted to comply with Fire Dept. City Specification No. 415. (FD) q. Service roads and fire access lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted, marked, and maintained per City Specification #415-Fire Lane Signs. If prior to approved signage fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant may be liable for related expenses. (FD) r. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. s. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. t. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. u. Submit a copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificate(s) based on construction drawings, or Floodproofing Certificate in the case on a non-residential structure, for each building. v. A second Elevation Certificate certifying the "as built" lowest floor for each building shall be submitted to the Planning Department, or a Letter of Map Revision shall be issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and submitted to the Planning Department. (Code Requirement) w. All drainage, pump station and channel improvements consistent with the intent and function of the facilities identified in the FEMA CLOMR, dated June 6, 2002, shall be completed in place and operational. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA shall be obtained by the developer following completion of the improvements. (PW) x. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with Fire Dept. City Specification 401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. y. The project shall comply with all provisions of the Huntington Beach Fire Code and Fire Dept. City Specification 422, Well Abandonment. z. The project shall comply with all provisions of the HBMC Section 17.04.085 and Fire Dept. City Specification 429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. aa. Testing to verify the estimated radon gas levels shall be implemented as deemed necessary by the Department of Planning. (MM) bb. The following water conservation measures shall be implemented as required by state law: 1) Ultra-low-flush toilets 2) Ultra-low-flow showers and faucets 3) Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating systems 4) Compliance with water conservation provisions of the appropriate plumbing code (MM) cc. Water pressure regulators to limit downstream pressure to a maximum of 60 psi shall be installed. (MM) dd. The applicant shall provide information to prospective residents regarding benefits of low water use landscaping and sources of additional assistance in selecting irrigation and landscaping. (MM) ee. The development shall comply with all applicable Mitigation Measures in Final Environmental Impact Report No. 97-2, and as modified in the Addendum EIR. ff. The development shall comply with all standards and principles for Subarea 4K in the Local Coastal Program Coastal Element. gg. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Impact Fee (TIF). The actual allocation shall be approved by the City. Appropriate credits shall be granted toward the TIF. The TIF shall cover the project's fair share of year 2020 improvements to the arterial street system. (MM) 5. The Departments of Planning, Public Works and Fire are responsible for compliance with all conditions of approval herein as noted after each condition. The Planning Director and Public Works Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to tract map are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director and Public Works Director have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission's may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. 6. Prior to finalization of the Tract or exoneration of the Warranty Bonds, maintenance for City maintained components of the City Park (Lots "A" and "S") shall be for a period of 12 months after the 90-day plant establishment period. The Park may open at the beginning of maintenance period. (PW) 7. Service roads and fire access lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted, marked, and maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. (FD) & A public art element shall be integrated and be in a location that is visible to the public within the Parkside Estates residential project. Public art shall incorporate the following: a) Artistic excellence and innovation b) Appropriate to the design of the project c) Indicative of the community's cultural identity (ecology, history, society) The public art element shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board, the Planning Director, and the Cultural Services Division Manager prior to issuance of any building permit for the project. The public art shall be in place at the subject site prior to final building inspection. 9. The Revised TTMs and CUP and CDP in concept shall not become effective until GPA 98-1(R) and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5(R) have been approved by the City Council, and LCPA has been approved by the City Council, and California Coastal Commission, and is in effect. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, and Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 2. Construction shall be limited to Monday— Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 3. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$50 for the posting of a Notice of Exemption or Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the City's action. If a Notice of Determination is required an additional check in the amount of$1,993 for California Department of Fish and Game shall be made out to County of Orange and submitted within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. 5. The Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be adhered to. A Mitigation Monitoring Fee shall be paid to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 6. Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final inspection or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and at the rate applicable at that time. The current rate of $163 per net new added daily trip is adjusted annually. This project is forecast to generate a total of 1332 new daily trips for a total traffic impact fee of$217,116.00 or $1956.00 per unit. (PW) 7. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 8. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within a public right-of-way. (PW) 9. The development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and operation of all underground storage tanks. (FD) SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT - Mayor Bohr will announce the month of June as Gay and Lesbian Pride Month. The month of June was first proclaimed by President Clinton to recognize gays, lesbians, their families and friends in commemoration of the Stonewall Inn uprising in New York City 40 years ago. Recognition of the Federal cultural heritage months is a program of the City's Human Relations Task Force. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CENTENNIAL (MONTH - Mayor Bohr to invite Ralph Bauer from the Centennial Celebration Committee to announce June as Diversity Month. Mr. Bauer will give an overview of the events scheduled for the month to celebrate diversity in the community. ANNOUNCEMENT - Mayor Bohr to call on Councilmember Gil Coerper to recognize the Huntington Beach Art Center for a recent exhibit and event that was held. PRESENTATION - Mayor Bohr to recognize Eagle Scout Ian Ferguson for his accomplishments. PRESENTATION - Mayor Bohr to invite Erika Reardon, Chair for the Taste of Huntington Beach Committee, Ron McLin, President of the Huntington Beach Restaurant Association, Stephanie Beverage, Director Library Services and Nanci Williams, Principle Librarian from the Children's Library to present a check to the Huntington Beach Children's Library following the fundraiser held April 26th. PRESENTATION - Mayor Bohr to invite Children's Needs Task Force Chair Bob Dettloff to announce the honorees for the Youth Character Awards. PUBLIC COMMENTS (3 Minute Time Limit) 8 Speakers COUNCIL COMMITTEE / APPOINTMENTS / LIAISON REPORTS AND ALL AB 1234 DISCLOSURE REPORTING None CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT None PUBLIC HEARING Public Hearing Item Nos. 1 and 2 are two segments of one public hearing and will be held concurrently. 1. (City Council) Public hearing to adopt Resolution No. 2009-27 approving General Plan Amendment 98-1(R); approve Zoning Map Amendment No. 96- 5(R) with findings and adopt Ordinance No. 3831 amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO); approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 09-05(R) with findings; adopt Ordinance No. 3832 amending Chapter 210 of the HBZSO relating to Residential Districts; adopt Ordinance No. 3833 amending Chapter 216 of the HBZSO relating to the Coastal Page 3 Conservation District; adopt Ordinance No. 3834 amending Chapter 221 of the HBZSO relating to the Coastal Zone Overlay District; adopt Ordinance No. 3835 amending Chapter 230 of the HBZSO relating to Site Standards; and, adopt Resolution No. 2009-28 adopting Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA) No. 09-01 to amend the Local Coastal Program Implementing Ordinances to reflect Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5 (R) amending the zoning for the real property generally located on the west side of Graham Street, south of Kenilworth Drive, and Zoning Text Amendment No. 09-05 amending Chapters 210, 216, 221, and 230 of the HBZSO and requesting certification by the California Coastal Commission (Parkside Residential Project). Recommended Action: a) Approve General Plan Amendment No. 98-1(R) by adopting Resolution No. 2009-27, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 98-1(R);" and, b) Approve Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5(R) with findings for approval and approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3831 , "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5(R);" and, c) Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 09-05 with findings for approval and approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3832, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending Chapter 210 of the Huntington Beach Zoning Code Relating to Residential Districts;" approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3833, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Zoning Code Relating to the Coastal Conservation District;" approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3834, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Zoning Code Amending Chapter 221 of the Huntington Beach Zoning Code Relating to the Coastal Zone Overlay District;" approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3835, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 230 of the Huntington Beach Zoning Code Relating to Site Standards;" and, d) Approve Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 09-01 with findings for approval, and adopt Resolution No. 2009-28, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Adopting Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 09-01 to Amend the Local Coastal Program Implementing Ordinances to Reflect Zoning Map Amendment No. 96- 5(R) Amending the Zoning for the Real Property Generally Located on the West Side of Graham Street, South of Kenilworth Drive and Zoning Text Amendment No. 09-05 Amending Chapters 210, 216, 221, and 230 of the Zoning Subdivision Ordinance and Requesting Certification by the California Coastal Commission." One vote held for Items #1 and#2. Vote is reflected below Item #2. 2. (City Council) Approve revised Tract Map Nos. 15377(R) and 15419(R) and Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 amending Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 (Parkside Residential Page 4 Development) with findings and suggested conditions of approval. Recommended Action: Approve revised Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377(R) and 15419(R) and Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 with findings and suggested conditions of approval. 58 Late Communications 28 Speakers Approved as amended by Late Communication acknowledging revised Ordinances Nos. 3832, 3833, 3834, and 3835 striking language in Chapter 216, Section 216.04 (H) "including any area adjacent thereof"and adding language "staging of trucks shall occur onsite"to Condition of Approval No. 5.#for Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377(R) and 15419 (R). Approved 5-1-1 (Hardy No, Green Absent) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items #3 through #11) 3. (City Council/Redevelopment Agency) - Approve and adopt minutes. Recommended Action: Approve and adopt the minutes of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency regular meeting of May 4, 2009, the City Council/Redevelopment Agency regular meeting of May 18, 2009, and the City Council/Redevelopment Agency special meeting of May 21, 2009 as written and on file in the office of the City Clerk. May 4, 2009 and May 18, 2009 minutes Approved 6-0-1 (Green Absent) May 21, 2009 minutes, Approved 5-0-1-1 (Hardy Abstained, Green Absent) 4. (City Council/Redevelopment Agency) Receive and file the City Clerk's quarterly report listing of Professional Service Contracts filed in the City Clerk's Office between January 1, 2009 and March 31, 2009. Recommended Action: Receive and file the "List of Professional Service Contracts Approved by Department Heads Pursuant to Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 3.03 and Submitted to the Office of the City Clerk during the period of January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2009." Approved 6-0-1 (Green Absent) 5. (City Council) Authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Implementation Agreement to remain eligible for federal-aid funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for local transportation projects. City Council Recommended Action: Authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the "California Department of Transportation Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Implementation Agreement for Local Agencies." Approved 6-0-1 (Green Absent) Page 5 �S Apt, Council/Agency Meeting Held: Deferred/Continued to: Ap roved Co d'tionall App o ed ❑ Deni d Ci I JIZ-sA i g n a t r Council Meeting Date: 6/1/2009 Department ID Number: PL09-12 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION a SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COU IL MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: FRED A. WILSON, CITY ADMINISTR> R PREPARED BY: SCOTT HESS, DIRECTOR OF PLANN N SUBJECT: APPROVE REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 15377(R) AND 15419(R) AND ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 08-08 (AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18) - PARKSIDE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for City Council consideration is a request by Shea Homes to revise Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377(R) and 15419(R) and amend Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 (Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08) approved by the City Council on October 21, 2002 for the Parkside Residential Development. Funding Source: Not applicable. Recommended Action: Motion to: "Approve revised Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377(R) and 15419(R) and Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 with findings and suggested conditions of approval (Attachment No. 411 Alternative Action(s): 1. Deny revised Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377(R) and 15419(R) and Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 with findings for denial." 2. Continue revised Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377(R) and 15419(R) and Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 and direct staff accordingly." REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2009 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL09-12 Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: A. Richard Fitch, Jr., Hunsaker & Associates, 3 Hughes, Irvine, CA 92618 Property Owner: Shea Homes, 1250 Corona Point Court, Suite 600, Corona, CA 92879 Location: 17301 Graham Street (Westside of Graham, south of Kenilworth, adjacent to the Wintersburg Flood Control Channel) Revised Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377(R) and 15419(R) represent a request to modify conditions of approval and revise previously approved Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377 and 15419 by reducing the number of single family residential lots from 170 lots to 111 lots and increasing the number of lettered lots for open space and conservation purposes. The revisions include a reduction in the previously required land area to be dedicated to the City from 8.2 acres (4.1 acres of bluffs and down slope areas and an approximately 4.1 acre flat area at the base of the bluff) to 1.57 acres. Approximately half of the original 8.2 acres encompassed passive areas consisting of existing eucalyptus groves located on bluffs and slopes with terrain that prevented public use. The 8.2 acre land area was subsequently identified by the California Coastal Commission (CCC) as environmentally sensitive habitat area (ESHA), wetland area, or buffer area. The CCC modified the City approved land use plan and increased the amount of open space-conservation area from 3.7 acres to 23.1 acres. This area includes the bluffs, eucalyptus groves, approximately 6 acres of restored wetlands, trails with public viewing area, and buffer areas. Therefore, the current proposal for dedicating 1.57 acres to the City will be for public park use and relocated to a relatively flat area east of the ESHA and wetland area. The revised park area includes an approximately 0.57 acre passive area developed with trails and benches for public use. The remainder of the park will be active and consists of open fields, dual tot lot, and swing set. The revised subdivision plans consist of lots ranging from 5,500 to 11,742 square feet in size. The average lot size for the entire 111-lot project is 6,282 square feet. The density is 4.4 units per acre excluding the 1.57 acre public park dedication and lots reserved for coastal conservation (23.1 acres). Primary access to the proposed development will be provided at the same location from Graham Street. A second access for emergency access only is still proposed to Greenleaf at the northwest corner of the residential portion of the site. All streets will be public and there will be no vehicular access gates. Parking on both sides of the street is available throughout the subdivision. When the project was originally approved, the project site straddled the City boundary. A majority of the site was located within the City of Huntington Beach's jurisdiction (Tentative Tract Map No. 15377) and the remainder of the site was located within the County of Orange's jurisdiction (Tentative Tract Map No. 15419). Subsequently, the City annexed the portion of the site located within the County of Orange. The two tentative maps were not combined to maintain consistency with the original approval. -2- 5/21/2009 9:46 AM REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2009 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL09-12 Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 (Amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90) represents a request for the following: A. Reducing the number of single family dwelling units approved for development from 170 units to 111 units. The request also includes modifications to the previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow development on 74 lots with minimum 51 ft. frontages and minimum 5,500 sq. ft. lot sizes (average 6,282 sq. ft.) and three cul-de- sac lots with a minimum frontage of 31 ft. Those lots that are less than the code requirement of 60 ft. in width (45 ft. for cul-de-sac lots) and 6,000 sq. ft in size may be permitted as part of a PUD pursuant to Section 210.06, Property Development Standards of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO); and B. Improve a 1.57 acre public park (consisting of a 0.57 acre passive park and 1.0 acre active park) and increase open space-conservation areas to approximately 23.1 acres. Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 was approved on October 21, 2002 and included additional requests to allow development on a site with a grade differential of more than 3 ft. and retaining walls greater than 2 ft. in height. These requests are not proposed to be modified with this application. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 (Amendment to Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18) represents a request to review "in-concept" modifications to the approved plans for the Parkside Residential Development and associated infrastructure; creation, restoration, and preservation of wetlands and buffer areas; construction of a Natural Treatment System Water Quality basin (NTS); construction of a vegetated flood protection barrier; and creation of a trail system. The applicant requests to modify the development to be consistent with changes made by the CCC to the City approved land use plan. Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377 and 15419, Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 were originally approved by the City Council on October 21, 2002. To allow for the development, the City Council also amended the City's General Plan and the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The City then filed a Local Coastal Program Amendment with the CCC to approve the land use plan and zoning for the property because the project site is located in the coastal zone. Ultimately the CCC modified the City's action and reduced the amount of land available for development from approximately 37.4 acres to 26.4 acres and increased the amount of open space conservation area from 3.7 acres to 23.1 acres. Improvements required of the developer by the CCC within the 23.1 acres of open space include the creation of a 4 acre wetland and 100 ft. buffer area on the west side of the subject property, restoration of 0.38 acre degraded wetland area on the far westerly portion of the site, and construction of a Natural Treatment System Water Quality basin (NTS) to treat water runoff from the site. The developer will also be required to protect in place two eucalyptus groves with a variable width buffer area and a separate wetland (agriculture pond) area adjacent to the bluffs along the westerly property line. -3- 5/21/2009 9:46 AM REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2009 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL09-12 As a result, the applicant proposes to construct 59 fewer homes and reduce the number of housing products from two (A: 60 ft. wide lots with units ranging from 3,000 square feet to 3,400 square feet in size in size, and B: 50 ft. wide ranging from 2,600 square feet to 2,900 square feet in size in size) to one housing product. The new housing product includes four to five bedroom units ranging from 3,100 square feet to 3,700 square feet. Most units offer a two-car garage; there are some three-car garages. The units range in height from approximately 26'-0" to 29'-6". The applicant proposes to modify the elevations to provide a more updated design. The previously approved plans included an 8.2 acre park (4.1 acres located on a slope and the remainder as an active park) to be dedicated to the City. The previously approved park was 5.91 acres more than the minimum required 2.29 parkland dedication obligation based on the previously approved plans. The size and location of the previously approved park was determined when the project was originally submitted in 1996. At that time the project proposal consisted of 208 single family homes. The park land dedication obligation for 208 homes at that time was 3.56 acres. Subsequently, the project was reduced to 170 units and the park land dedication obligation was reduced; however, the developer maintained the size of the active park at 4.1 acres as well as included the 4.1 acre slope area in the park land dedication. As noted under the revised Tract Map request, the required land area to be dedicated to the City will be reduced. A majority of the previously approved park site is now designated as OS-C (Open Space — Conservation) per the CCC modified land use plan. The developer proposes to preserve this area as an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) consisting of eucalyptus groves and create wetland and buffer area in compliance with the CCC action. Therefore, the size and location of the park has been modified. Based on the reduced number of residential units, the project's park land dedication obligation is reduced to approximately 1.49 acres. The applicant proposes to dedicate and pay for the improvements of a 1.57 acre park. Approximately 0.57 acres will be designated as a passive park and located within the OS-C land use designation outside of the required 100 ft. wetlands buffer area. Approximately 1.0 acre will be active recreational area and located within the RL (Residential Low Density) land use designation. Additionally, Shea Homes proposes an approximately 1.8 acre linear paseo park along the northerly boundary of the site and a system of trails and open space along the EPA restored wetland area, which will be open to the public and maintained by the homeowners' association. The amount of soil proposed to be imported to the site will be less than the originally approved plans due to the decrease in the number of lots. On-site grading of approximately 225,000 cubic yards of dirt will now be imported to the site as opposed to 270,000 cubic yards. Most of the residential portion of the site will still be filled with dirt. The pad heights and street grades of the revised plans are comparable to the previously approved plans. The proposed lot pads will range from 6.3 ft. to 8.2 ft. in elevation. Several lots on the west side of the site are one foot higher than previously approved. Other pad heights are slightly elevated to varying degrees but are less than one foot in difference. In addition, the street grades are slightly elevated for drainage purposes are also less than one foot higher than the -4- 5/21/2009 9:51 AM REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2009 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL09-12 grades shown on the previously approved plans. The grade changes are minor in nature and do not result in any significant impact to views compared with the previously approved plans. The residential portion of the site is being elevated to comply with FEMA requirements and a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). Associated requests for General Plan Amendment No. 98-1(R), Local Program Amendment No. 09-01, Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5(R), and Zoning Text Amendment No. 09-05 are discussed in a separate report. These requests must first be approved by the City Council and CCC before the revised tentative tract maps and entitlement plan amendment become effective. Furthermore the Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 includes conceptual approval of revisions to Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18. The City Council action on the conceptual changes to the coastal development permit will be forwarded to the CCC for final review and approval. The Parkside project when approved in 2002 included numerous public improvements to storm drains, storm water pump facilities, flood channel improvements, sanitary sewers, public park, traffic signals and Graham Street striping. These improvements will remain with the revised plans and provide benefits to areas beyond the proposed development B. BACKGROUND: In conjunction with the tentative tract maps, conditional use permit and coastal development, the City amended its General Plan and the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance to allow for the development in 2002. The City then filed a Local Coastal Program Amendment with the California Coastal Commission (CCC) to approve the land use plan and zoning for the property because the project site is located in the coastal zone. In 2008 the CCC approved the Local Coastal Program Amendment for the Land Use Plan only and modified the 2002 City action by reducing the amount of land available for development from approximately 37.4 acres to 26.4 acres and increasing the amount of open space conservation area from 3.7 acres to 23.1 acres. Subsequently, the City Council formally accepted the CCC's action and amended the City's Coastal Element accordingly. With the developable area of the project site reduced by approximately one third, the developer submitted the subject entitlements to be consistent with the CCC action. Subdivision Committee The proposed revisions to the tentative tract maps were reviewed by the Subdivision Committee on April 21, 2009. Staff introduced the proposed revisions to the subdivision including the street patterns within the tract as well as access to the development, and the layout of the single family residential lots. The Subdivision Committee reviewed the recommended conditions of approval for the revised tentative maps from the Planning Department, Public Works Department, and Fire Department. The Subdivision Committee recommended approval of the proposed project to the City Council subject to minor modifications to the conditions of approval restricting haul trucks and heavy equipment from -5- 5/21/2009 9:46 AM REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2009 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL09-12 arriving/leaving the site prior to 8:00 am during the school year. One committee member opposed the project citing concerns with the proximity of the project entrance to existing residences to the north. C. STAFF ANALYSIS: The previously approved plans consisted of 170 single family residential units and included lots in much of the area now designated as open space-conservation. Several changes have been made to the site plan since the CCC modified the City approved land use plan. The current plan is for 111 units, a 1.57 acre public park, and 23.1 acres of open space which includes areas for coastal conservation. The analysis of the proposed revisions evaluates land use compatibility, project layout and design, reduction in park size, and housing goals. Land Use Compatibility The revised project will remain compatible with surrounding uses consisting of single family residences to the north, east, and south. The proposed density is the same as that previously approved and comparable with density of existing homes. The proposed residential units are compatible in both height and architectural massing to the adjacent single family residential projects and therefore will have no adverse impacts to surrounding developments regarding scale and massing. The revised plans retain a 133 ft. separation between the existing homes and proposed homes including a 50 ft. wide landscaped area (paseo park) along the north property. The public park is proposed to be reduced in size and shifted slightly towards Graham Street to provide for the creation of a wetland and buffer areas. The previously approved plan identified an 8.2 acre park (consisting of 4.1 acres for passive use and 4.1 acres for active use) along the westerly portion of the site and necessitated a mitigation measure requiring the construction of a sound wall along portions of the northerly property line. This mitigation measure is no longer necessary due to the reduced size and scaled down activities in the proposed park. Furthermore, the existing 5 to 6 ft. high wall constructed along the perimeter of the residential tract to the north of the site will provide adequate separation to the proposed park. The open space areas are sited in a manner that maximizes their effectiveness while at the same time protecting and creating buffers to cultural and biological resources. Project Layout/Design The layout of the site and circulation pattern will remain essentially the same. However, the layout now excludes the portion of the site now designated as open space-conservation. The revised plan retains one access point to the proposed development, which is from Graham Street and will remain a signalized intersection. This entrance connects to a street that parallels the paseo park and continues through the project to the public park now -6- 5/21/2009 9:46 AM REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2009 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL09-12 located adjacent to the newly created wetland buffer area. The site will also retain secondary access for emergency purposes only at Greenleaf Lane. The proposed building layout includes varied front setbacks and varied garage placement and orientation on each lot to create visual interest. The units also include distinct entrances with some including front porches to create architecturally attractive semi-private front yard space and foster community interface. Reduction in Public Park The reduced park size of 1.57 acres meets the minimum required parkland dedication obligation. The area occupied by the previously approved 8.2 acre public park will remain as open space, but will be inaccessible to the public because of the sensitive nature of the eucalyptus groves and wetland and buffer areas to be created. However, the developer proposes to construct approximately 0.7 acres of additional open space areas to augment recreational opportunities on the site. These areas are proposed to be located south of the public park and will be constructed with a network of trails connecting the park to public access trails along the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel. In addition, the developer proposes to construct a 1.8 acre paseo park along the northerly property line. The main purpose of the paseo park is to provide a buffer between the existing residential uses to the north of the site and the proposed development. However, the paseo park includes a meandering walkway that can be used by the public and provides a link between the park and Graham Street. Also, the developer proposes to construct trails along the west side of the restored EPA wetlands with connections to public access trails along the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel. Staff determined that the proposed revisions to the park meet and exceed the minimum required parkland obligation by paying for the park improvements and providing additional open space areas available to the public. Housing Goals The revised request to construct 111 single family residential units will help meet the City's housing goals. In addition, the developer has previously satisfied the project's affordable housing requirements of 12 affordable units (10% of the total 111 proposed units) for families of low-income level (less than 80% of Orange County median). In cooperation with Bridges Corporation, Shea covenanted 14 units for low-income households at a multi-family development located at 16122 Sher Lane. D. SUMMARY Staff recommends that the City Council approve Revised Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377 and 15419 and Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 (Amendments to Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 in concept) based upon the following: -7- 5/21/2009 9:46 AM REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2009 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL09-12 ® The plans are in substantial compliance with the previously approved plans. ■ The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of RL-7 (Low Density Residential) and proposed designation of RL-7 on the subject property. The project is consistent with the Local Coastal Program/Coastal Element as it does not impact public access or recreational opportunities in the Coastal Zone. ® There are several public improvements to be constructed as a result of this project including a traffic signal, storm drainage improvements and flood control protection to ensure that the development is adequately served with infrastructure. 46% of the project area (23.1 acres) will be used for coastal conservation: newly created, restored, and preserved wetland and buffer areas, preserved in place eucalyptus groves, water quality natural treatment system, vegetated flood protection barrier, and trail system with view area for public use. ■ 15% of the project area (4 acres) will be used for public use open space: a 1.57 acre dedicated public park and 2.5 acres of common open space throughout the project. The project along with the 10% affordable housing requirement previously provided helps the City meet its housing goals. ■ Project is well-designed in terms of street layout and architecture. ■ The project is designed to be compatible with adjacent low density residential uses in terms of density and building layout, and open space uses. Strategic Plan Goal: Strategic Plan Goal: Preserve the quality of our neighborhoods, maintain open space, and provide for the preservation of historic neighborhoods. The revisions to the previously approved tract maps, conditional use permit, and coastal development permit reduce the number of lots for development of single family homes which in turn increases the amount of open space used for the creation, restoration, and preservation of wetland, environmentally sensitive habitat area (ESHA) and buffer areas. The revisions maintain adequate buffers to existing residential development to the north and include homes of equal size and scale to preserve the quality of existing neighborhoods. In addition, the development proposes numerous public improvements to storm drains, storm water pump facilities, flood channel improvements, sanitary sewers, public park, traffic signals and Graham Street striping. Environmental Status: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 97-2 was prepared by EDAW Inc., a consultant hired by the City to analyze the potential impacts associated with the Parkside project. The EIR was certified by the City Council on October 21, 2002. Subsequently, in 2008 the California Coastal Commission approved Local Coastal Program No. 01-06, modifying the land use plan for the Parkside site. The California Coastal Commission's environmental review of LCP No. 01-06 is treated as the functional equivalent of the EIR process under section 21080.5 of the California -8- 5/21/2009 9:46 AM REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL. ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2009 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PE09-12 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and sections 15251(c) and 15265 of the State CEQA Guidelines. In order to document the changes to the City's originally approved project, an Addendum to EIR No. 97-2 was prepared by EDAW (May 2009). The Addendum concludes that there are no changes in circumstances or new information of substantial importance that would require preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR since certified EIR No. 97-2 and CEQA review as part of approved LCP No. 1-06 were completed. The Addendum is added to the environmental documentation for the project and is considered in the City's action on the revised project. Attachment(s): umber . ® - . . 1. Suggested revised Findings and Conditions of Approval Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 received and dated May 11, 2009 3 Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 received and dated May 11, 2009 4 Revised Site plan, floor plan and elevation received and dated March 11, 2009 5 Revised Conceptual Landscape Plan dated November 18, 2008 6. Revised Fence and Wall Plan dated April 14, 2009 7 Revised Parking Plan dated November 18, 2008 g Previously approved Findings and Conditions of Approval 9 Previously approved Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 received and dated July 8, 2002 10. Previously approved Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 received and dated July 8, 2002 11. Previously approved Site plan, floor plan and elevation received and dated July 8, 2002 12. Request for City Council Action dated October 21, 2002 13. Applicant's Narrative dated November 18, 2008 14. Letters received 15. Addendum EIR to EIR No. 97-2 dated May 2009 16. PowerPoint Presentation -9- 5/26/2009 11:31 AM _ ATTACHMENT # 11 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15377 AND 15419/ ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 08-08 (AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18) (June 1, 2009) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - REVISED TENTATIVE MAP NOS. 15377 AND 15419: 1. Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 for subdivision of 45 acres into 111 single family residential lots and several lettered lots for open space and landscaped areas and Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 for the subdivision of approximately 4.8 acres into one (1) lot for open space and wetland restoration areas are consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designations on the subject property, Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan, and other applicable provisions including the provisions for Planned Unit Developments. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. The project site is generally flat and able to accommodate the type of development proposed from a circulation and drainage perspective. The site is required to be elevated in compliance with City's requirements for new construction and the Conditional Letter of Map Revision from FEMA approved June 6, 2002 and therefore, requires approximately 225,000 cubic yards of compacted fill. The proposed fill and grade will permit the site to be developed consistent with adopted plans and will result in a gross density of 4.4 units per acre (net density of 5.7 units per acre), which is below the allowable density. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The majority of the site and the entirety of the area of the development footprint has been previously used for farming and does not contain habitat for wildlife or fish. Buffers between the residential uses and areas that will be preserved as open space are included in the design of the subdivision. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. No existing easements for the public at large will be affected by the project. The project will provide public access through the site to the Public Park and public trails in the vicinity. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL— ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 08-08 (AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90): 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 for the development of 111 two-story, detached single family residential units as a Planned Unit Development (PUD), with a minimum lot size of 5,500 sq. ft., an average lot size of approximately 6,200 sq. ft., and typical 55' frontages; construction of a 1.0 acre active park, a 0.57 acre passive park and a 1.8 acre paseo park; retaining walls greater than two ft. in height; and 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.1 development on a site with a grade differential of greater than three (3)feet from the low to the high point will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The project will be graded to minimize drainage impacts while complying with the flood requirements of FEMA and the City. The proposed grade differential to adjacent residential properties will be mitigated through the use of substantial landscaped setbacks and tree requirements. The project will include preservation of ESHA and the preservation and restoration of wetlands, which will be in preserved open space. The project includes significant infrastructure improvements that will have regional benefits. 2. The entitlement plan amendment will be compatible with surrounding single family residential and open space land uses. The project includes two-story homes that are similar to the surrounding developments; it also incorporates buffer areas for aesthetics and intensified landscaping. Open space areas are located adjacent to existing open space areas to maximize use and buffers. 3. The proposed project will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Variations to the wall heights are permitted by conditional use permit and lot size and width variations are allowed as part of a planned unit development. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Low Density Residential and Open Space—Conservation. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: Policy LU 9.2.1. Require that all new residential development within existing residential neighborhoods (i.e., infill) be compatible with existing structures, including the use of building heights, grade elevations, orientation and bulk that are compatible with the surrounding development. Policy LU 14.1.1: Accommodate the development of public parks, coastal and water- related recreational uses, and the conservation of environmental resources in areas designated for Open Space on the Land Use Plan Map. The proposed homes are compatible with existing homes in the area in terms of style, materials, and colors. The buildings are well articulated and will have enhanced building elevations along street frontages. The building pads are higher but there is a setback buffer along the north property line. The development will also include an approximately one acre public park and a network of trails. Furthermore, the development includes approximately 23.7 acres of land set aside for preservation of ESHA, wetlands and buffer areas. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL IN CONCEPT— ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 08-08 (AMENDMENT TO COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18: 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 for the development of a 111-unit single family residential project including park and infrastructure improvements and the preservation of ESHA, wetlands and buffer areas within an area of deferred 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.2 certification in the coastal zone as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan and the Local Coastal Program. The project layout is consistent with the Low Density Residential and Open Space—Conservation land use designations on the property. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed development complies with all development standards except for the increased retaining wall heights, and the minimum lot width and size, which are allowable in the RL district through the CUP process. The development will be in compliance with City and FEMA requirements pertaining to flood protection. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. The proposed project will provide all required infrastructure consistent with the Local Coastal Program and City requirements in accordance with the project phasing plan. 4. The development conforms to the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The project will not permanently impact public access or recreation opportunities in the coastal zone; the project will add opportunities for access to surrounding trails and a proposed public park and will improve a proposed bikeway adjacent to the channel and the developed portion of the site. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 15377 AND 15419: 1. Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 and Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 dated November 18, 2008, shall be the approved layout except as amended per the conditions stated herein and as follows: a. Lot No. 1 of Revised TTM 15419 shall be designated open space conservation area and shall be a part of the adjoining open space conservation area within Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15377. 2. The final map for Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 shall not be approved by the City Council until Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5(R) and General Plan Amendment No. 98-1(R) are approved and in effect, and a Local Coastal Program Amendment has been approved by the California Coastal Commission for the Implementation Plan. 3. At least 90 days before City Council action on the final maps, CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Departments of Planning, Public Works and City Attorney's office for review and approval. The CC&Rs shall include the following: a. Special provisions and guidelines for the HOA to implement, fund, and regulate the maintenance of the Public Park softscape and landscape improvements, which includes the irrigation system, lawn areas, ground cover areas, shrubs and all trees located within the Public Park ( Active park area, Lot A); all common area landscaping; private drainage facilities and inlet 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.3 structures; private Water Quality Treatment Systems; wetlands (existing and renaturalized); Passive Park (Lot S); emergency access road; the six foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to emergency access road linking Greenleaf Lane to Street"A"; Buffer Areas; Eucalyptus trees; bike trail links; slopes; decomposed granite walkways; open space areas along Graham Street; surface drainage for lots "B" thru "Z"; and Lots "AK, "BB", and "CC" by the Homeowner's Association (HOA). Maintenance includes all weeding, fertilizing, pest and disease control and plant replacements, the removal of non-native and/or invasive species, replacement of the original approved plant materials as required, tree trimming, irrigation adjustments, dust control/sweeping, as specified or designated structure or upkeep/ replacement equipment, and trash clean-up. The standards for maintenance shall be per the City adopted Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications and other relevant standards related to the improvements and shall include the Arboricultural maintenance section for public property for tree trimming and care within the common areas. The emergency access road shall be maintained in conformance with the City's Fire Department special design criteria and approved structural section exhibits. b. An exception shall be made in the CC&Rs to provide that the City of Huntington Beach shall maintain and be responsible for all play equipment, hardscape (concrete or hard paving) adjacent to or part of play equipment, picnic tables, gazebo and related facilities, cushioned or rubberized surfacing, sub-surface drainage features or pipes six inches or larger, benches and any hardscape related improvements or structures within the Park boundaries. c. Special provisions and guidelines to implement, fund, and regulate the maintenance of slopes, fences and retaining walls that serve as or are contiguous to flood control protection or features, except within the County Flood Control right-of-way and the vegetated flood protection feature or FEMA certified levee in lot "Y". The CC&Rs will provide that the HOA will maintain the landscaping and irrigation on the vegetated flood protection feature in lot "Y". d. Special provision to prohibit the blocking or screening of fire hydrants located in public right-of-way. e. Language that will include and reference special provisions and guidelines for funding, implementation, maintenance, monitoring, and updating of the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) including treatment train. The WQMP shall be included in the CC&Rs as an attachment or addendum for conformance with NPDES requirements. The CC&Rs shall restrict any revision or amendment of the WQMP except as may be dictated by either local, state or federal law and the City of Huntington Beach Local Implementation Plan (LIP). f. Notification to purchasers that there will be a City public park and protected open spaces within the tracts with HOA maintenance responsibilities, and that vehicular access to Greenleaf is for emergency purposes only. 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.4 g. Notification to purchasers that landscaping for individual housing lots and recreation areas adjacent to an environmentally sensitive habitat area or buffer shall not include any exotic invasive plant species. h. Reference the Special Utility Easement Agreement that is required for the on- site public water system. i. The Pest Management Plan and Domestic Animal Control Plan and provide funding and implementation of a Pest Management Plan and a Domestic Animal Control Plan. j. The Homeowners Association (HOA) shall enter into a Special Utility Easement Agreement with the City of Huntington Beach for maintenance and control of the area within the (public)water pipeline easement, which shall address repair to any enhanced pavement treatment, etc., if the public water pipelines and/or appurtenances require repair or maintenance. The HOA shall be responsible for repair and replacement of any enhanced paving due to work performed by the City in the maintenance and repair of any water pipeline. The Special Utility Easement Agreement shall be referenced in the CC&Rs. (Resolution 2003-29) 4. The following conditions shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise stated. Bonding may be substituted for construction in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. (PW) a. The Final Maps shall be consistent with the approved Revised Tentative Maps. b. Vehicular access rights to all public streets, either proposed or existing, shall be released and relinquished to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the City Huntington Beach. (PW) c. The grading plan and improvement plans shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review. The engineer shall submit cost estimates for determining bond amounts. (PW) d. A final sewer design study of the project system shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The developer shall design the sewer system including replacement of the existing lift station on Graham Street, as required to serve the development and upgrade the system in conformance with the approved preliminary study and City design criteria. The City may, at its own discretion, construct the sewer lift station and associated conveyance lines to maintain temporary service of the existing station, and relocate facilities as needed to lot "B" within the development. Separate conveyance instruments for the lot and easements may be used if the lift station construction precedes recordation of the map. The developer will enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City for their fair share of the lift station improvements. (PW) 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.5 e. Prior to first plan check submittal, a hydraulic water capacity analysis is required to confirm appropriate on-site sizing and layout of the public on-site water system. The City will perform the analysis based on the City's hydraulic water model. The developer must coordinate this effort with the Public Works and Fire Departments to initiate this endeavor and shall be responsible to pay the City for all related fees required to perform the analysis. (PW) f. Final hydrology and hydraulic design analysis and calculations for both on and off site drainage facilities shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The project improvements shall meet the intent of, and be consistent with or of equal effect to the facilities proposed in the Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) issued by FEMA on June 6, 2002. On-site drainage shall not be diverted or concentrated to adjacent properties, but shall be handled by a Public Works approved method. The final design analysis of the system shall be consistent with the approved preliminary studies. All pad elevations must comply with FEMA design criteria in conformance with the CLOMR (BFE 2.2 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD)) and as directed by the City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works. Gradients or flowlines less than those permitted in the City's Grading Manual shall not be permitted in earthen swales without prior approval from Public Works. (PW) g. Conservation easements shall be recorded for Lot 1 of Tract 15419 and Lots AA, BB, CC, and Z of Tract 15377. h. The following shall be shown as dedications to the City of Huntington Beach on the Final Map No. 15377 and/or Final Map No. 15419 as applicable: 1) The 1.57 acre public park (Lots "A" and "S") shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach in fee simple for parkland purposes pursuant to Section 254.08.H. of the HBZSO. The applicant shall submit to the Department of Public Works a Grant Deed, along with a preliminary title report, granting a fee ownership in the parkland unencumbered by any easements or covenants, both recorded and unrecorded, which restrict any and all uses by the City. It shall be the applicant's responsibility as part of the dedication to obtain, record, and submit all necessary quitclaims ensuring unencumbered. The designated land shall also be certified as clean in conformance with the City's Soil Clean-Up Standard, City Fire Specification 431-92, by an acceptable testing firm. Upon acceptance of the Grant Deed and the submittal of a title insurance policy in an amount equal to the appraised value of the land, the City Clerk, if granted authority as part of the acceptance of the tract map by City Council, shall record the Grant Deed for the parkland dedication. (PW) 2) The domestic water system and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans for these tracts. Easement widths shall conform with the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 600. (PW) 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.6 3) Lot "B" and the sanitary sewer system lift station, force mains and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans for these tracts. (PW) 4) The storm drain and water quality system and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans for both tracts, except those facilities designated to be maintained by the HOA as designated on the Revised tentative maps and as shown on the improvement plans and as prescribed in the CC&Rs. Easement widths shall conform with the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 300. (PW) 5) A 2.00-foot wide public utility easement along both sides of each street, per Standard Plan No. 104. (PW) 6) Graham Street for street purposes. (PW) 7) An emergency access road from Greenleaf Lane to "A" Street. The minimum width shall be 30 feet. (PW) 8) "A" Street through "F" Street for street and utility purposes. (PW) 9) An easement for public pedestrian access purposes for the two bike trails linking the flood control channel with "C" Street. 10)An easement for public access purposes 10-feet in width adjacent to or in proximity to the northerly right-of-way of"A" Street within Lots, "B", "C", "D" "O","P", "Q", "R","S", "T", "U", "V", and "W", the paseo park, passive park and open space lots (with the exception of Lot "BB"), and Lot "N" the pedestrian access lot. 11)Lot "Y" in fee simple for flood control and levee purposes. Lot "Y" may also be dedicated to the County of Orange if the Orange County Flood Control District agrees to accept it for these purposes. 12)Lot "X" in fee simple for water quality purposes. i. All street lighting shall be conveyed to Southern California Edison Co. for maintenance and operation. (PW) j. A reproducible mylar copy and print of the final tract map shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works at the time of recordation. (PW) k. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall comply with Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18 for the following items: (PW) 1) Tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor. 2) Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the County of Orange. I. Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the City per the following criteria: Design Specification: 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.7 1) Digital data shall be full size (1:1) and in compliance with the California coordinate system — STATEPLANE Zone 6 (Lambert Conformal Conic projection), NAD 83 datum in accordance with the County of Orange Ordinance 3809. 2) Digital data shall have double precision accuracy (up to fifteen significant digits). 3) Digital data shall have units in US FEET. 4) A separate drawing file shall be submitted for each individual sheet. 5) Digital data shall be in compliance with the Huntington Beach Standard Sheets, drawing names, pen color and layering conventions. 6) Feature compilation shall include, but shall not be limited to: Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN), street addresses and street names with suffix. File Format and Media Specification: 7) Shall be in compliance with the following file format: ➢ AutoCAD (version 13 or later) drawing file: _.DWG 8) Shall be in compliance with the following media type: ➢ CD Recordable (CD-R) 650 Megabytes m. No construction traffic or vehicle access shall be taken from or to Greenleaf for any purpose other than emergency vehicle access. Any future connection of Greenleaf to the development for public street purposes or private access shall be prohibited until otherwise conveyed through a public hearing process before the City Council. n. A Certificate of Insurance shall be filed with the Department of Public Works and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW) o. All improvement securities (Faithful Performance, Labor & Material and Monumentation Bonds) and Subdivision Agreement shall be posted with the Department of Public Works and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW) 5. The following conditions are required to be completed prior to issuance of Precise Grading Permits: a. A Precise Grading Plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Final grades and elevations on the grading plan shall not vary by more than one (1) foot from the grades and elevations on the approved Tentative Map unless otherwise required by these conditions and shall conform to FEMA requirements for elevation above the flood water levels as directed by the Department of Public Works. The recommendations from Section 7.0 and 8.0 of the geotechnical study, Appendix E of the EIR, shall be incorporated into the earthwork activities. (MM) The recommendations of the report in Appendix E shall be augmented or superseded where necessary by the updated 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.8 Geotechnical Study, dated November 25, 2008. The following public improvements shall be shown on the plan: i. Class I bike trail and adjacent lot slopes along the channel. (PW) ii. Two bike trails linking the flood control channel with "C" Street. iii. All slopes, walls, and drainage control devices. (PW) iv. The owner shall submit a "Notice of Intent" (NOI), along with the required fee, to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in compliance with NPDES general construction permit requirements. Copies of the NOI and the written replies received from the SWRCB shall be submitted to the City. (PW-MM) b. A sewer lateral shall be provided for each habitable lot per city standards. (PW) c. All structures over twenty feet (20') in height from the point of connection at the public water source shall require a backflow protection device on the domestic water service unless otherwise approved by the Water Division. (PW) d. Separate irrigation services, meters and backflow devices shall be required for any Homeowner Association (HOA) landscaping. The softscape portion of the Public Park, (Lot"A" Active Park and Lot "S" Passive Park), shall be included and tied with the irrigation service to the HOA common area landscape. (PW) e. Each proposed dwelling unit shall require a separate domestic water meter and service. All domestic water meters shall be sized in accordance with the California Plumbing Code (CPC) and the requirements of the City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works and the Fire Department. (PW/FD) f. Plans for EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS at Greenleaf/LOT A shall be submitted and approved by the Fire and Planning Departments. The plans shall indicate gate location, method to secure, slope, and overall final elevation change along and adjacent to the alignment. (FD) g. Final finished grade for the park shall be subject to the approval of the Departments of Public Works and Community Services. The final finished grade shall, at a minimum: i. Protect existing trees, meet police department visibility requirements, provide proper drainage, meet conditions for maintaining a playable park and a passive park and if necessary provide a drainage interceptor at the toe of the existing slope that transports run off to the storm drain system prior to entering the playable park area except as required to maintain buffer or conservation areas and landscaping. (PW) ii. The finish grade in the City park site shall be raised with a City approved topsoil. (PW) iii. The slope of the Public Park pad, (Lot "A" Active Park), shall drain either toward the Naturalized Meadow Grass area or to B Street. The minimum accepted slope for drainage shall be as allowed by the City's Grading Manual. There shall be a,low berm (18" to 30" high as 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.9 measured vertically from the sidewalk), or a slope up to B Street of the same height along the back of sidewalk of B Street with the side slopes graded to a maximum of 5:1. The drainage of the lot if toward B Street, shall drain through under sidewalk drainage structures. Said walkway locations shall be designed so that any concentrated water drain-ways shall not erode the decomposed granite walkway. If the drainage is toward the Naturalized Meadow Grass area there shall be no heavily concentrated flow areas, and the water shall be directed away from the Tot Lot, Gazebo and Swing Set area. (PW) iv. The gradient and configuration of the emergency access road shall be approved by Public Works and Fire. (PW/FD) h. The Developer shall design and construct a new wet well/dry well sewer lift station and force main as required by the City to replace the existing station in Graham. The new station shall be sized to accommodate existing and the proposed development flows. The existing station shall be abandoned in- place by the developer as directed by The Department of Public Works. The used pumps/controllers shall be returned to the City Yard. The design of the lift station shall comply with all design requirements and criteria of the City of Huntington Beach. The City may, at its own discretion, construct the sewer lift station and associated conveyance lines to maintain temporary service of the existing station and relocate facilities as needed to Lot "B" within the development. (PW) i. The Developer shall submit a Hazard Mitigation and Flood Protection Plan to the City of Huntington Beach for review and approval. (4K) j. The Developer shall design and construct the ultimate improvements to the north levee of the East Garden Grove -Wintersburg Channel (C05) per County of Orange Flood Control District's adopted design standards (sheet pile and cathodic protection, or an equivalent lining if approved by the County). Said channel improvements shall be constructed from the westerly right of way of Graham Street to the westerly edge of the vegetated flood protection feature. Requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers where appropriate, and the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) shall be observed in the design and construction of all channel and abutting slope improvements in and adjacent to the channel. A cooperative agreement between OCFD and the Developer shall be completed for any cost sharing, special design criteria, or conditions of the work to be undertaken prior to the issuing of a grading permit. (PW) k. The Developer shall remove the existing oil-field access bridge over the C05 channel westerly of the Slater Pump Station, unless otherwise directed by the Orange County Flood Control District. (PW) I. The Developer shall install two (2) new pump systems (motor, pump, controls, heat exchanger, and necessary appurtenances)within the existing vacant pump bays, or shall replace existing pump systems to equal the proposed efficiency and pumping capacity of the existing plus two new pump systems in the Slater Pump Station as determined necessary by the City Engineer (equipment to match/equal City specification). Subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, a request for fee credits may be considered for improvements exceeding the developer's required project impact mitigation. 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.10 For purposes of fee credit, the value of each existing pump bay to be utilized shall be considered to be $300,000 unless it is proven to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to be a different amount. The developer will be required to make capacity improvements to the system as necessary to drain the subject development and tributary flows to the site as required by the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall also obtain necessary written approvals from the County of Orange and other pertinent agencies as required prior to issuance of grading permits. (PW) m. The Developer shall design and construct off-site drainage improvements as required by the Department of Public Works to mitigate impact of increased runoff, as well as conveyance of ultimate upstream flows or deficient, downstream drainage systems. Design of all necessary drainage improvements shall provide mitigation for all rainfall event frequencies up to a 100-year frequency. The Developer shall provide the necessary hydrologic and hydraulic studies as required to justify final pad elevations on the site in conformance with the latest FEMA requirements, and provide any needed data to update that portion of the City's Master Plan of Drainage to reflect the changes and improvements of this project in the plan. The vegetated flood protection feature (lot "Y") shall conform to the FEMA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Design Guidelines (most specifically USACOE Manual EM 1110-2- 1913.)Among the items of design criteria to be included are the following: (PW) i. The top of levee or vegetated flood protection feature shall be wide enough to accommodate a minimum 12-foot wide clear access for maintenance vehicles. Drainage swales and flow lines along the brow of the levee shall not be within the 12-foot travel area. If walls are incorporated into the design, drainage swale flow lines shall be a minimum of 18-inches from the wall and shall be concrete gutters or other compatible structure or device to minimize erosion behind the wall. ii. The waterside of the levee shall be 2:1 or steeper with riprap or similar slope protection, or flatter than 2:1 without hard slope protection. Walls in combination with slopes may be used as approved by the City. iii. The landside of the levee shall be 2:1 or steeper with riprap or similar slope protection, or flatter than 2:1 without hard slope protection to minimize seepage and permit easy maintenance. iv. The levee design shall include a seepage barrier. If sheet piles are employed, no seepage barrier is required. Transitions from exposed sheet piling to earthen berms shall be concrete lined or an approved alternative. V. A vehicle turnaround with a turning radius or hammerhead design consistent with the wheel base criteria of maintenance vehicles shall be provided at the end of the levee or vegetated flood protection feature maintenance road within lot "Y" in a manner approved by the Department of Public Works. 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.11 vi. The road surface on the top of levee or vegetated flood protection feature shall maintain a minimum elevation of 13.6 feet as shown on the approved Tentative Map or a minimum 1-foot of freeboard above the committed water surface elevation in the channel, whichever is greater. The top of levee or vegetated flood protection feature shall tie into the existing topography to prohibit a breach or intrusion into the subdivision from seawater high tide events or storm flows. (PW) n. Storm Drain Improvement Plans, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) conforming with the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The WQMP shall also be submitted to Orange County Coastkeeper for review and comment. (PW) i. To the greatest extent feasible, low flow urban runoff from Cabo del Mar shall be directed to a gross pollutant removal device. ii. Gross pollutant removal devices (CDS or equivalent)for the removal of debris, sediment, oil and water separation, etc., shall be installed as part of the treatment train for the main line systems. Access to these devices for maintenance shall be provided and included within an easement to the City. iii. The developer shall design and construct a low flow urban runoff treatment train for partial flows from the Slater Pump Station, which may be conveyed to the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel (C05). iv. A SWPPP shall be prepared and updated as needed during the course of construction to satisfy the requirements of each phase of the development. The plan shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMP's) and other City requirements to eliminate polluted runoff until all construction work for the project is completed. V. A WQMP shall be prepared, maintained and updated as needed to satisfy the requirements of the adopted NPDES program and the City of Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program. The plan shall incorporate water quality measures for all improved or unimproved phases of the project. All structural BMP's shall be sized to infiltrate, filter, or treat the 85-percentile 24-hour storm event or the maximum flow rate of runoff produced from a rainfall intensity of 0.2 inches per hour. The WQMP shall include an extensive Home Owner's Association education program, including information booklets and packages for each homeowner, and periodic informational programs to keep owners current with WQMP practices and requirements. (PW/4K) o. A Funding agreement or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for a pro-rata share of the maintenance and replacement of the public water quality treatment train shall be completed between the City of Huntington Beach and the developer prior to recordation of the final map and prior to the issuance of 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.12 precise grading permits. The agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the CC&Rs of the development. p. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan, prepared by a Licensed Landscape Architect, shall be submitted to the Departments of Public Works and Planning for review and approval. The Landscape Construction Set shall identify the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials; an irrigation plan; a grading plan; an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The plan for non-Open Space-Conservation areas shall prohibit the planting, naturalization or persistence of invasive plants and shall encourage low-water use plants, and plants primarily native to coastal Orange County. The plan shall include irrigation demands to ensure proper irrigation service sizing. (PW/4K) q. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, applicable Design Guidelines, and the Local Coastal Program. The plan shall include all common areas, the proposed active and passive City Park, Graham Street setback area, and the paseo park. The paseo park along the north property line shall include intensified landscaping to further screen possible headlight intrusion. (PW/MM/Code Requirement) r. A Habitat Management Plan shall be prepared for all areas designated Open Space- Conservation, which shall include restoration, enhancement and perpetual conservation and management of delineated wetlands, wetland and habitat mitigation, and establishment of appropriate buffers from development. The Plan shall be submitted to the Departments of Public Works and Planning for review and approval. (41K) s. An erosion control and silt control plan for all water runoff during construction and site preparation work shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. (PW/MM) t. Street Improvement Plans for improvements to Graham Street shall be prepared per the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 103, (to 80'/64' standard), and submitted for review and approval. The developer shall include the following modifications to achieve the minimum number of travel lanes specified and include any additional striping modifications identified by the Transportation Manager to best accommodate specific traffic operations (PW/MM): i. Improve Graham Street along the project frontage, as needed, to correct the stopping sight distance and stacking problems between the crosswalk across Graham at Street "A" and the crest of the Wintersburg Channel Bridge as approved by the Department of Public Works. ii. Restripe Graham Street from Street"A" to Glenstone Drive with a seven (7) foot bike lane in each direction, one twelve (12) foot through lane in each direction, and a fourteen (14) foot painted two-way left turn median. (MM) 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.13 iii. Restripe Graham Street northerly from Street "A" as directed by the Department of Public Works, to transition with a seven (7) foot bike lane in each direction, one eighteen (18)foot through lane in each direction, and a fourteen (14)foot painted two-way left turn median. A protected left turn pocket on Graham Street, (northbound to westbound) shall be provided with appropriate tapers in accordance with the design speed, (50 mph). Signage shall be added to the intersection of Graham Street and Kenilworth Drive to keep intersection clear. (MM) iv. The developer shall design and install signing and striping plans in accordance with Public Works Standards u. Internal public streets shall be designed and constructed as follows (PW): i. All street grades shall have a minimum gradient of 0.50%. ii. Street "A" ("Entry Street") shall be designed and constructed per the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 104 modified, (56736'). A dedicated left turn lane and dedicated right turn lane (within 26' from median island to outer curb face) exiting onto Graham Street shall be provided. A 15-foot wide median island shall be constructed at the entry. No parking or driveway openings will be permitted on Street "A" from Graham Street to the end of lot "C". iii. Streets "B" thru "F," shall be designed and constructed per the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 104 Modified, (48736'). iv. Parking layout shall conform to City Standards and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code requirements, including Municipal Ordinance No. 10.40.050. Thirty (30) parking spaces shall be provided for park parking above the count required for residential lot guest parking. No on-street parking shall be permitted adjacent to emergency access areas in compliance with Fire Department Standard Specification 401 and 415. V. Curb, gutter and sidewalk along all street frontages, per City Standard Plan Nos. 202 and 207. vi. An ADA compliant access ramp at the corners of all street intersections, and where required by Federal and State code. v. Access for the handicapped in conformance with Title 24, shall be provided from the public sidewalk into the public park at the northerly and southerly ends. w. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Transportation Manager that standards (including ADA) regarding pedestrian/bicycle safety along the perimeter sidewalks will be met. (MM) x. The Developer shall design and install Southern California Edison owned street lighting. The plan shall include the height, location, and intensity of 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.14 streetlights on-site. Street light spacing shall be in conformance with City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan 411. (PW/MM) y. A traffic signal shall be designed and constructed for the intersection of Street"A" and Graham Street. (MM) z. The traffic signal shall be hard-wire interconnected with the existing traffic signal at Warner Avenue and Graham Street per Public Works Standards and Specifications. (PW) aa. Traffic Control Plans, prepared by a Licensed Civil or Traffic Engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval, for work within the City's right-of-way. (PW) bb. A licensed engineer shall prepare a detailed soils and geological/seismic analysis. This analysis shall provide detailed recommendations for grading, over excavation, engineered fill, dewatering, settlement, monitoring, protection of adjacent existing structures, landscaping, chemical and fill properties, liquefaction requirements, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. Said report shall also provide recommendations to certify that post development ground water conditions shall not be affected or affect improvements. The report will provide recommendations for rough and precise grading. The developer shall provide a minimum of four (4) agricultural soil tests for fertility and suitability within the park area prior to developing a finish-grading plan. In addition, a geotechnical expert shall be on-site daily during dewatering to monitor soil conditions. A diminimus permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board shall be required. (PW) cc. If soil remediation is required, a remediation plan shall be submitted to the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments for review and approval in accordance with City Specifications No. 431-92 and the conditions of approval. The plan shall include methods to minimize remediation-related impacts on the surrounding properties; details on how all drainage associated with the remediation efforts shall be retained on site and no wastes or pollutants shall escape the site; and shall also identify wind barriers around remediation equipment. (PW) dd. Soil imported for the park area shall be approved by the City Landscape Architect. The developer shall employ a soil test lab approved by the City Landscape Architect to obtain and test soils that are to be utilized in raising the grade of the proposed park area. After a topsoil source is approved, the developer shall guarantee that said soil is delivered to the site and used on the park. (PW) ee. For import soils, the project shall comply with all provisions of the HBMC Section 17.04.085 and Fire Dept. City Specification 429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. (FD) ff. Provide proof that all site soil meets the requirements found in the City of Huntington Beach Soil Cleanup Standard, City Specification No. 431-92. (FD) gg. The Fire Department must be notified of who will be the environmental site auditor supervising testing operations during soil import. The selected 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.15 environmental firm is responsible for obtaining Fire Department approval for their testing plan. (FD) hh. The name and phone number of an on-site field supervisor hired by the developer shall be submitted to the Departments of Planning and Public Works. In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on Graham Street every 250 feet, and at Greenleaf Lane indicating who shall be contacted for information regarding this development and any construction/grading- related concerns. This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity. He/She will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities, dust control, water quality, truck routes, construction hours, noise, etc. Signs shall include the applicant's contact number, City contact(Construction Manager(714) 536-5431) regarding grading and construction activities, and "1-800-CUTSMOG" in the event there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No. 403. (PW) ii. The applicant shall notify all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property of a tentative grading schedule at least 30 days prior to any such grading. (PW) jj. The developer shall coordinate with the Department of Public Works, Transportation Division in developing a truck and construction vehicle routing plan. This plan shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur, restrict heavy equipment and haul trucks from arriving and leaving the site to between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. during the school year, and specify methods to mitigate construction related impacts to adjacent residents. These plans must be submitted for approval to the Department of Public Works. (PW/MM) kk. A grading/erosion and dust control plan shall be completed and must abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control; and provide a plan to the Department of Public Works indicating such compliance. (PW) ll. Block wall/fencing plans (including a site plan, section drawings, and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls, walls, and fences) consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage. Double walls shall be prohibited. Protective fencing or barriers shall be installed along any interface with developed areas to deter human and pet entrance into all restored and preserved wetland and ESHA buffer areas. (41K) mm. If grading occurs during the normal breeding season for the red-tailed hawk and other raptors locally, (February 15 through August 31), a survey shall be conducted for active nests. Should active nests be located within the zone of potential disturbance due to grading or construction activities, work shall be limited to areas 500 feet away from the nest until the young have fledged and have begun foraging away from the nest site. The 500- foot protection zone shall be fenced with visible warning-color materials. Nest trees shall be removed during the non-breeding season only. (MM/4K) 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.16 nn. The property owner shall conduct a subsurface test investigation for CA- ORA-1308 and 1309 to determine the horizontal boundaries of the sites as well as to confirm the surface conclusions of non-significance as indicated in the March, 1997 Archeological Assessment. This may be accomplished though the mechanical excavation of a number of auger holes as well as two (2) 1 x1 meter hand excavated units for stratigraphic control. The subsurface test investigation (including a discussion of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of resources), final mitigation recommendations and cost estimates shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. (MM/4K) oo. The applicant shall create, if deemed necessary through Condition No. 5(kk), a cultural resource management plan based on the subsurface test results. A full data recovery program shall be designed if site avoidance is not feasible through design. Possible recovery plans include, but are not limited to preservation, salvage, partial salvage, or no mitigation necessary. The plan shall include conservation with the appropriate Native American Organization and be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. Additionally, the plan shall require peer review in conformance with the Coastal Commission's Archeological Guidelines. (MM) pp. The property owner shall provide written evidence that a certified archaeologist has been retained and shall be present at the pre-grading meeting/conference, shall establish procedures for archaeological resource surveillance, and shall establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification and evaluation of the artifacts as appropriate. The archaeological resource surveillance procedures shall include a provision for Native American review of grading operations. If additional or unexpected archaeological features are discovered, the archeologist shall report such findings to the applicant and to the Planning Department and the appropriate Native American Organization. If the archaeological resources are found to significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the applicant, for exploration and/or salvage. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. (MM/4K) qq. A bikeway plan shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach's Departments of Planning and Public Works, in consultation with the Manager of the County PFRD/HBP Program Management and Coordination, for approval of consistency with the Orange County Bikeway Plan. (MM) rr. A Public Access Plan shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach's Departments of Planning and Public Works and shall be coordinated with and include the bikeway plan. (41K) ss. The applicant shall submit and have approved a noise mitigation plan to the Department of Planning that will reduce or mitigate short-term noise impacts to nearby noise sensitive. The plan shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance and shall include, but not be limited to (MM): 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.17 1) Criteria of acceptable noise levels based on type and length of exposure to construction noise levels; 2) Physical reduction measures such as temporary noise barriers that provide separation between the source and the receptor; temporary soundproof structures to house portable generators; and 3) Temporary generators (if utilized) shall be located as far as practical from sensitive noise receptors. 4) Mitigation measures such as restrictions on the time of construction for activities resulting in high noise levels. tt. The applicant shall be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion into the project grading permit. Measures, subject to the approval and verification by the Department of Public Works, shall include, as appropriate (MM): 1) Provision of rideshare incentives. 2) Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. 3) Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. 4) Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. 5) Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. uu. The applicant shall produce evidence acceptable to the City Engineer that: (MM) 1) All grading and construction vehicles and equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation. 2) Stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. 3) Operations shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. vv. The applicant shall produce evidence (specifications) acceptable to the City Engineer that the new wall along Graham Street (along the project's boundary adjacent to proposed homes on Ghraham Street)will be constructed to achieve maximum sound attenuation. (MM) ww. The recommendations contained in the geotechnical study, located in Appendix E of the EIR, shall be incorporated into the earthwork activities of the proposed project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Earthwork activities include all grading, clearing and demolition, site preparation, unsuitable soil removals, backcuts, excavation processing, compaction of all fills, mixing, benching, inspection, survey control, subgrade preparation, cut and fill slope construction, haul roads, import soils, structural load and settle ment/subsidence measures, and storm drain relocation. (MM). The recommendations of the report in Appendix E shall be augmented or superseded where necessary by the updated Geotechnical Study, dated November 25, 2008. 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.18 xx. The applicant shall contract with a dewatering expert to prepare a detailed Dewatering Plan. This plan shall include the placement of monitoring wells near the northern property line to evaluate ground water levels during the proposed project dewatering activities. The dewatering activities shall be adjusted immediately if the monitoring wells show ground water level changes which may affect subsidence of adjacent properties. The Dewatering Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. (MM) yy. A Phase II environmental soil sampling shall be conducted to determine the residual levels of pesticides in the soil. If inappropriate/unsafe levels per County Health Department standards are identified by this analysis, "clean up" measures shall be recommended and implemented. The Phase II sampling and any necessary measures shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. (MM) zz. The applicant shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan showing conformance to the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and all NPDES requirements (enacted by the EPA)for review and approval by the City Engineer. The plan shall reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practical using management practices, control techniques and systems, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions which are appropriate. (MM) aaa. The applicant shall be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles be equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. (MM bbb. The developer shall submit a hydraulic computer water model analysis for the development proposed, which addresses the following: 1) Water demand required by project (including fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Department) 2) Master Plan/General Plan Amendment (GPA) review for consistency. 3) The City of Huntington Beach Water(Master Plan) System Computer Model (i.e. H2ONET) must be run with the proposed land use demands (i.e. GPA), and contrasted with the model run using the existing land use demands, (i.e. the General Plan, in effect at the time the Water Master Plan was adopted). 4) The City of Huntington Beach Water Division must be contracted to perform this analysis using the existing City of Huntington Beach Water System Model, for a fee to be paid by the developer a minimum of 30 days in advance. If the analysis shows that project demands cannot be met with the City's current water system, the developer shall be required to upgrade the City's system to meet the demands and/or otherwise mitigate the impacts of the project at no cost to the City. (MM) ccc. Irrigation systems within the Park and the open space areas, which minimize water waste, shall be used to the greatest extent possible. Such measures should involve, where appropriate, the following features: 1) Raised planters and berming in conjunction with closely spaced low volume, low angle (22 '/z degree) sprinkler heads. 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.19 2) Drip irrigation 3) Irrigation systems controlled automatically to ensure watering during early morning or evening hours to reduce evaporation losses. 4) Temporary irrigation systems for wetland restoration are excluded from these provisions. 6. During demolition, grading, site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available to be used throughout the day during site grading and construction to keep the soil damp enough to prevent dust being raised by the operations and when leaving the site. Wet the area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust pick up by the wind; spread soil binders; and implement street sweeping as necessary. (MM) b. All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 7:00 a.m. (8:00 a.m. during the school year) or leave the site no later than 8:00 p.m., and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only. (PW) c. During construction, the area shall be wet down in the late morning and after work is completed for the day(MM). d. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose substances and building materials shall be covered, or to maintain a minimum freeboard of two feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. (MM) e. Install vehicle wheel-washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites. Prior to leaving the site, wheels of all haul trucks shall be washed off on- site on a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets. Install vehicle wheel-washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites. (MM) f. Where feasible, pervious paving materials shall be used to reduce surface water runoff. (MM) g. Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas. (PW) h. Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site. (PW) i. The remediation operations shall be performed in stages concentrating in single areas at a time to minimize the impact of fugitive dust and noise on the surrounding areas. (PW) j. Comply with the "Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan" and "Water Quality Management Plan" requirements. (PW) 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.20 k. Discovery of additional contamination/pipelines, etc., must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly. Discovery of contaminated soil and/or abandoned oil wells require immediate fire department notification. All project processes in the immediate discovery area shall cease until approved plans are in place. (FD) I. Construction equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation, maintain equipment engines in proper tune. Truck idling shall be prohibited for periods longer than 10 minutes. (MM) m. Use low sulfur(0.05% by weight)fuel by weight for construction equipment. (MM) n. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. (MM) o. A phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily emissions shall be complied with. Treat unattended construction areas with water(disturbed lands which have been, or are expected to be unused for four or more consecutive days). Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. (MM) p. The planting of vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on construction sites shall be required. Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion from storm water especially on super pads. (MM) q. On-site parking shall be provided for all construction workers and equipment unless approved otherwise by the Department of Public Works. No Parking will be permitted in restricted area and on Graham Street. (PW) r. Enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of sand, dirt, or other aggregate materials shall be required. (MM) s. The construction disturbance area shall be kept as small as possible. Control off-road vehicle travel by posting driving speed limits on these roads, consistent with City standards. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators when practical. The applicant shall be responsible for assuring that vehicle movement on any unpaved surface other than water trucks shall be terminated if wind speeds exceed 15 mph. (MM) t. Compliance with all Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code requirements including the Noise Ordinance. All activities including truck deliveries associated with construction, grading, remodeling, or repair shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. All heavy equipment shall arrive or leave the site no earlier than 8:00 A.M. and no later than 8:00 PM during the school year. Such activities are prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. (Code Requirement) 5/18109 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.21 u. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. v. The property owner is responsible for all required clean up of off-site dirt, pavement damage and/or restriping of the public rights-of-way as determined by the Department of Public Works. (PW) w. The property owner shall be responsible for paving all access aprons to the project site and for the maintenance of the paving. (MM) x. The property owner shall be responsible for incorporating measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion with the implementation of rideshare incentives, transit incentives, construction area parking, use of flagmen, and implementation of measures to minimize the obstruction of through traffic lanes, as deemed appropriate by Public Works. (MM) y. The project shall provide easy access into and within the project site for emergency vehicles and addresses shall be well marked to facilitate response by officers. Prior to the first final inspection, project site plans depicting these requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Police Department. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS — REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 15377 & 15419: 1. Revised Tentative Map Nos. 15377 and 15419 shall be valid for two (2) years of the date of final approval which is from the time the Local Coastal Program Amendment and Coastal Development Permit for the area is deemed certified by the California Coastal Commission. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 60 days prior to the expiration date. 2. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 3. All applicable fees shall be paid from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments fees prior to map recordation. (PW) 4. All new and existing overhead utilities shall be installed underground in accordance with the City's Underground Utility Ordinance. In addition, all electrical transformers shall be installed underground. Aboveground transformers may be allowed due to certain groundwater conditions locations and shall be approved by the City Engineer and City Landscape Architect. 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.22 SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 08-08 (AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18): 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated January 21, 2009 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way. Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. (Code Requirement) b. Individual building site plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Departments of Planning and Public Works. The final building layout shall be within the building envelope as depicted on the Building Envelope Plan. (MM) c. Depict the location of all gas meters, water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units, mailboxes (as approved by the United States Postal Service), and similar items on the site plan and elevations. If located on a building, they shall be architecturally designed into the building to appear as part of the building. They shall be architecturally compatible with the building and non- obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required setbacks. d. If outdoor lighting is included, energy saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. (MM) Street lighting, exterior residential lighting and park lighting, if any, adjacent to ESHA and buffer areas shall be limited in intensity and shielded in order to minimize impacts to these areas. e. Non-reflective materials shall be utilized to the extent feasible. Individual building site plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Public Works Department. (MM) 2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. Submit three (3) copies of the site plan and floor plans and the processing fee to the Planning Department for addressing purposes after street name approval by the Fire Department. (FD) c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.23 d. To maintain required emergency access and site safety during project construction phases, submit a Fire Protection Plan in compliance with City Specification #426-Fire Safety Requirements for Construction Sites, or other City Specifications approved by the City Fire Department. (FD) e. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification #401- Minimum Access for Fire Department Access, or as approved by the City Fire Department. Fire Access Roads shall be provided and maintained in compliance with City Specification #401, Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access. Driving area shall be capable of supporting a fire apparatus (75,000 Ibs and 12,000 lb point load). Fire Access Road Turns and Corners shall be designed with a minimum inner radius of seventeen feet (17') and a minimum outer radius of forty five feet (45') per City Specification #401 Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access. For Fire Department approval, reference and demonstrate compliance with City Specification #401 Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access on the plans. (FD) f. Fire hydrants must be installed and be in service before combustible construction begins. Shop drawings shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Fire Department. Indicate hydrant locations and fire department connections. The number, spacing and location of all fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Fire Department and the Public Works Water Division. (FD) g. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed throughout each unit. For Fire Department approval, plans shall be submitted to the Building Department as separate plans for permits (FD). h. A fire alarm system in compliance with Huntington Beach Fire Code is required. For Fire Department approval, shop drawings shall be submitted to Building as separate plans for permits. The system shall provide water flow, tamper, and trouble alarms, manual pull stations, interior and exterior horns and strobes, voice communication, and 24-hour central station monitoring. (FD) i. Street names must be approved by the Fire Department. Please refer to City Specification #409-Street Naming Process, Public or Private. (FD) j. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a Licensed Soils Engineer and submitted with the building permit application. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding: grading, foundations, retaining walls, streets, utilities, and chemical and fill properties of underground items including buried pipe and concrete and the protection thereof.(BD) k. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g- factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. (Code Requirement) 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.24 I. Floor plans shall depict natural gas stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters and central heating units. m. Contact the United States Postal Service for approval of mailbox location(s). n. The recommendations contained in the geotechnical study, located in Appendix E of the EIR shall be incorporated into the structural design of the proposed project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Structural design activities include: Foundation Design; Settlements including Foundation Loads and Seismically Induced Settlements; Post-Tensioned Slab/ Foundations; Mat Foundations; Other Foundation Recommendations such as Footing Embedment, Underslab Treatment, and Subgrade Moisture Content; Concrete Driveways, Sidewalks, and Flatwork; Structural Setbacks; Retaining Walls; Other Design and Construction Recommendations such as Lot Drainage, Utility Excavations, Utility Trench Backfill, Corrosion, Metallic Structures, and Concrete Structures.(MM) The recommendations of the report in Appendix E shall be augmented or superseded where necessary by the updated Geotechnical Study, dated November 25, 2008. o. It shall be proven to the City that all structures are designed in accordance with the seismic design provisions of the latest California Building Code in effect in Huntington Beach to promote safety in the event of an earthquake.(MM) p. Building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. If during the Fire Department's plan check it becomes evident that fire ground operations will become impeded, the department will impose additional fire code requirements in addition to the automatic sprinkler systems, alarm systems, access roads, etc. (MM) q. The applicant shall consult with the Police Department during preliminary stages of the project design to review the safety features, determine their adequacy, and suggest improvements. (MM) r. The applicant shall consult with the Water Division and Park, Tree and Landscape Division of the Public Works Department during design and construction of the Park for further water conservation measures to review irrigation designs and drought tolerant plant use, as well as measures that may be incorporated into the project to reduce peak hour water demand. (MM) 3. The following conditions shall be completed prior to issuance of Building Permits: a. Submit a copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file to the Planning Department; and submit 8 inch by 10 inch colored photographs of all colored renderings, elevations, materials sample board, and massing model to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file. b. A precise grading permit shall be issued. (PW) 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.25 c. The final Tract Maps shall be recorded with the County of Orange and a copy filed with the Planning Department. (PW/Code Requirement) d. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials; an irrigation plan; a grading plan; an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The plan shall include all common areas, the proposed City Park, Graham Street setback area, and the paseo park. The paseo park along the north property line shall include intensified landscaping to further screen possible headlight intrusion. In addition, Revised TTM 15419 shall consist of non-invasive, native drought tolerant or wetland plant material without a permanent irrigation system. (PW) e. The Consulting Arborist (approved by the City Landscape Architect) shall review the final landscape tree planting plan and approve in writing the selection and locations proposed for new trees and the protection measures and locations of existing trees to remain. Existing trees to remain shall also be addressed by said Arborist with recommendations/requirements for protection during construction. Said Arborist report shall be incorporated onto the Landscape Architect's plans as construction notes and/or construction requirements. The report shall include the Arborist's name, certificate number and the Arborist's wet signature on the final plan. (PW) f. An interim parking and building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department to assure adequate parking and restroom facilities are available for employees, customers and contractors during the project's construction phase and that adjacent properties will not be impacted by their location. The plan shall also be reviewed and approved by the Departments of Fire and Public Works. The applicant shall obtain any necessary encroachment permits from the Department of Public Works. (PW) g. The project applicant shall implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding storm drainage improvements which shall include, but not be limited to (MINI): 1) Construct the necessary storm drainage improvements (identified on Exhibit 42 within the EIR)to handle increased flows and intercept off-site flows. 2) Ensure that future building pads are placed at elevations suitable to withstand 100-year flood. 3) Construct the necessary improvements to the East Garden Grove — Wintersburg Channel (C05) along the site perimeter from the westerly Graham Street right of way to the westerly edge of the vegetated flood protection feature. 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.26 k. The applicant shall show proof of compliance with the Mitigation Agreement established between the Huntington Beach Union High School District, subject to the approval of the City of Huntington Beach. (MM) I. Pervious paving material shall be used whenever feasible to reduce surface water runoff and aid in groundwater recharge and slopes and grades shall be controlled to discourage water waste through runoff. (MM) m. The property owner shall construct the new sewer lift station and force main in accordance with the City-approved Sewer Plan for the proposed project, and implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding sewer infrastructure improvements to handle increased sewer flow demands. (MM) n. The Southern California Gas Company or designated natural gas provider shall be consulted with during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. (MM) o. SCE shall be consulted with during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. (MM) p. The applicant shall provide proof of incorporation of City comments and/or conditions related to the overall proposed design and layout of buildings and landscaping. The Design and layout of buildings shall be approved by the Planning Department. (MM) 4. With the exception of model homes, structure(s) cannot be occupied, the final building permit(s) cannot be approved, and utilities cannot be released for the first residential unit until the following has been completed: a. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed. (PW) b. Landscape irrigation and planting installation shall be certified to be in conformance to the City approved landscape plans by the Landscape Architect of Record in written form to the City Landscape Architect prior to the final landscape inspection and approval. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed. (PW) c. A Pest Management Plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Huntington Beach that, at a minimum, prohibits the use of rodenticides, and restricts the use of pesticides, and herbicides in outdoor areas, except necessary Vector Control conducted by the City or County. (41K) d. A Domestic animal control plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Huntington Beach that details methods to be used to prevent pets from entering the Open Space-Conservation areas. (41K) e. The Developer shall provide, in connection with the sale of each housing unit within the development, an information packet that explains the sensitivity of the natural habitats within or adjacent to the project site and the need to minimize impacts on the designated ESHA and buffer areas and the prohibition on 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.27 landscaping that includes exotic invasive plant species on lots that are directly adjacent to an ESHA or buffer area. The information packet shall include a copy of the Domestic Animal Control Plan and Pest Management Plan. f. The applicant shall provide proof that energy saving features have been installed in project homes as required by the California Building Code. Features may include: solar or low-emission water heaters, energy efficient appliances, double- glass paned windows, low-sodium parking lights, etc. (MM) g. The public park shall be completed at the request of 50% occupancy (or by the 551h home Certificate of Occupancy). (PW) h. All public infrastructure must be completed per the approved improvement plans. (PW) i. All improvements must be completed per the approved grading improvement plans. (PW) j. The applicant shall be responsible for improving Graham Street in accordance with the approved signing and striping plan. (PW/MM) k. Applicant shall provide the City with Microfilm copies (in City format) and CD (AutoCAD only) copy of complete City approved landscape construction drawings as stamped "Permanent File Copy" prior to starting landscape work. Copies shall be given to the City Landscape Architect for permanent City record. (PW) I. Automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed throughout. Shop drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to system installation. (FD) m. Fire hydrants must be installed before combustible construction begins. Prior to installation, shop drawings shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department. (Fire Dept. City Specification 407) (FD) n. Backflow protection shall be constructed per the Huntington Beach Water Division Standards Plans for irrigation and fire suppression water services. o. Address numbers shall be installed on structures to comply with Fire Dept. City Specification 428. (FD) p. Secondary emergency access gates must be secured with KNOX and association (if any) hardware. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with Fire Dept. City Specification 401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. Fire lanes will be designated and posted to comply with Fire Dept. City Specification No. 415. (FD) q. Service roads and fire access lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted, marked, and maintained per City Specification #415-Fire Lane Signs. If prior to approved signage fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant may be liable for related expenses. (FD) 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.28 r. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. s. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. t. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. u. Submit a copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificate(s) based on construction drawings, or Floodproofing Certificate in the case on a non-residential structure, for each building. v. A second Elevation Certificate certifying the "as built" lowest floor for each building shall be submitted to the Planning Department, or a Letter of Map Revision shall be issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and submitted to the Planning Department. (Code Requirement) w. All drainage, pump station and channel improvements consistent with the intent and function of the facilities identified in the FEMA CLOMR, dated June 6, 2002, shall be completed in place and operational. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA shall be obtained by the developer following completion of the improvements. (PW) x. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with Fire Dept. City Specification 401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. y. The project shall comply with all provisions of the Huntington Beach Fire Code and Fire Dept. City Specification 422, Well Abandonment. z. The project shall comply with all provisions of the HBMC Section 17.04.085 and Fire Dept. City Specification 429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. aa. Testing to verify the estimated radon gas levels shall be implemented as deemed necessary by the Department of Planning. (MM) bb. The following water conservation measures shall be implemented as required by state law: 1) Ultra-low-flush toilets 2) Ultra-low-flow showers and faucets 3) Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating systems 4) Compliance with water conservation provisions of the appropriate plumbing code (MM) cc. Water pressure regulators to limit downstream pressure to a maximum of 60 psi shall be installed. (MM) 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.29 dd. The applicant shall provide information to prospective residents regarding benefits of low water use landscaping and sources of additional assistance in selecting irrigation and landscaping. (MM) ee. The development shall comply with all applicable Mitigation Measures in Final Environmental Impact Report No. 97-2, and as modified in the Addendum EIR. ff. The development shall comply with all standards and principles for Subarea 4K in the Local Coastal Program Coastal Element. gg. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Impact Fee (TIF). The actual allocation shall be approved by the City. Appropriate credits shall be granted toward the TIF. The TIF shall cover the project's fair share of year 2020 improvements to the arterial street system. (MM) 5. The Departments of Planning, Public Works and Fire are responsible for compliance with all conditions of approval herein as noted after each condition. The Planning Director and Public Works Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to tract map are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director and Public Works Director have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission's may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. 6. Prior to finalization of the Tract or exoneration of the Warranty Bonds, maintenance for City maintained components of the City Park (Lots "A" and "S") shall be for a period of 12 months after the 90-day plant establishment period. The Park may open at the beginning of maintenance period. (PW) 7. Service roads and fire access lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted, marked, and maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. (FD) 8. A public art element shall be integrated and be in a location that is visible to the public within the Parkside Estates residential project. Public art shall incorporate the following: a) Artistic excellence and innovation b) Appropriate to the design of the project c) Indicative of the community's cultural identity (ecology, history, society) The public art element shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board, the Planning Director, and the Cultural Services Division Manager prior to issuance of any building permit for the project. The public art shall be in place at the subject site prior to final building inspection. 9. The Revised TTMs and CUP and CDP in concept shall not become effective until GPA 98-1(R) and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5(R) have been approved by the City Council, and LCPA has been approved by the City Council, and California Coastal Commission, and is in effect. 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.30 INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, and Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 2. Construction shall be limited to Monday— Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 3. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$50 for the posting of a Notice of Exemption or Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the City's action. If a Notice of Determination is required an additional check in the amount of$1,993 for California Department of Fish and Game shall be made out to County of Orange and submitted within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. 5. The Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be adhered to. A Mitigation Monitoring Fee shall be paid to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 6. Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final inspection or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and at the rate applicable at that time. The current rate of $163 per net new added daily trip is adjusted annually. This project is forecast to generate a total of 1332 new daily trips for a total traffic impact fee of$217,116.00 or $1956.00 per unit. (PW) 7. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 8. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within a public right-of-way. (PW) 9. The development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and operation of all underground storage tanks. (FD) 5/18/09 Parkside TTM EPA Attachment No. 1.31 ATTAC H M E N T #2L] ;L-W-OR TP-4CT NO. 10853 KEN 7RACT M. 57D2 ... . ........ no N"N"N", 0o. % ........... 4. 3 I-SN"K, V-1 Al A. i ZA -Ug 'mac I A CAL STREET SECTIONS lv A 'A. LEGAL ADESCRIP "TAT 4 za"&-- to �Z�ZWTABLE e -o stATE,po, 1-m r Rn .2 Em A .1 A sra co .d, 114 1 A SECTION'L*-'L* LLM LLM LLM VICINITY MAP LAND USE SUMMARY tly 00 't 4m 414 \I, DATE —1 Al. LID," SheaMmes M.U.SA11. &ASSOCIATES REVISED , A I A v ' ' I N E . TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 15377 OF MaNWING Mml,D, CITY OF HUNT(NOTON BEACH 2 ONRYW 'A' EEr PRo][n bynACB V-o ,ON 00 0 1;- 75 SECTION"A"- "A" SECTION "D"- "D" 25 A, 23, 0 El 01:1 711E] 7 Fj - SECTION 08 "B" SECTION "E"- "E" h 24- IB MO}OffD 21' 73 10 1p I 0 0 -V SECTION"C"- "C' SECTION "I"' 101. ---------- ------------------------------- --------------------- -------- ------ ---------------------- SECTION "C"- "C" SECTION "H"- "H" L L t LIAIRK PARR -------------- ORMWLF ------------ ---_________ _ SECTION 'I"- "I" r SECTION"J"- "J" SECTION "K"- "K" CROSS SECTIONS Sheallome ViVNSAKEIk &A ss OCIATES RE 2 I It N E I N C REVISED�EDDS'NE STATION ENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO,15377Dr COF HUNTINGTON BEACH --.�"—, - 1 2 SCALE: 1"_ 12' 1 ATTACHMENT #3 w. T Il;�,;,� .... .......- v, NOTES I RIS.G U,10 USE.1 2. ...6 Z. -WEN SPACE COVS+FJATIOM z 4, PARK NOr I,- 1,,SE,,_E, 11 ol 111 al�l ..S A, __Ol P I GE MN -TM OF YS O� I W 6 TRiCC 11N 111 1-6 A • TI-1�mc�wsmcr L110, I—, I...... JE T YK T44,7 MULTIPLE—AU,BE FLO,PUNS—,TO I—I— J,,/ M a^°/.i„�,. ��{ i`�l a F' o� Y/� £ Y e' F IJ.IS 11 AN APPLIGTION FOR I 0£VEL—IT IMTUM 'I M.I.S ALJUI-.IN R I LUNG GROSS AP& 1.1 Ac. A// V IT a LEGAL DESCRIPTION V_ A-1 011—LlN--IA 111 O—JAIN �,/tn_ —�l—1 l—I—.PAIE 2W couxn. V; LAND USE SUMMARY LOT�X N LOT N, USE o1 OPEN SPACE" I, \1� of j DATE VX -i zi W.0 537' GROSS AREA 4IB ACt EXIST.HUCALYPTUS % 'NIA A, CONTOUR INTERVAL RREFCR T0 Al—1 R5 �_A NX, X, �\\,—11 I. ",, TOTAL LOTS N SIGNAL LANDMARK API;110-010-37 v" VICINITY MAP SIGNAL LANDM016_ A 2RK 5 APN: _I�LTLAVNO NOT A PAR 0- J,,- +N N, 0 To 0,65(, ol\Co op, Fy LOCATION MAP I Dja APN:ONA�11,""`06-24MARK LEGEND QD "T U., NTABK MAOf AN, PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF. L JPIEPAIrl FOR: PREPARED ITY, SHEET HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES REVISED SheaHmes I R V I IN E I IN C TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.15419 OF Nghm.hvWIA EXP.o/m/w DATE nANNIN CA 926M.ENGINEERING SURVEYING 21 S PR(949)51MWO-M M SIX14M CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLOTTED W,1—71,19 MTE.Mw.18.2009 W.BJPM FILE:`.\W7Z\PI- Pr j.I,t\E%11_Gli\TTM\;I—M-19A, ATTACHMENT #4 KENILWORM DRIVE TRACTNO, M02 R �Fl 4 /V L camWw' NOTES V""7—,o0 TYPICAL BU4LOlWG ENVELOPE LEGAL.?"Tp 4 L -.r LOT SUMMARY TABLE j A",lump 12 T im ka 7� Z 9 U VICINITY MAP UNIT AUX SUMMARY ,Ae,, \01 VIC, LAND USE SUMMARY " ,4 ...... TZ- tr —UR 1— 1 IFGFNO SITE PLAN I UNSAKER&ASSOCIATES REVISE.TEN.TIVE— I I v I N E . I N C VAPNO 15377 AND 16419 M CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 3$'A" I M neDRM Il£X 14 1 OGREAT RM ytx is-° - - I II I I M.nA 1 I-I O it DRM�1 19�%In_ I 1 () 3 31 --- ----. r—r- I I Q E b I DwwG nn 3 II 1 I I LAU I I GARAGE wEx]]o ______ N/OPT. I3GNUS RM ---- WDRM 3 Ib� I I if�a' 1 O BA 2 PDR BFD12M 2 2%II e I PLAN 1 3 , 109 SQ . FT . aAssEM I" - LACON PA1:;,P- I-CSIE) E I 14 147-08175 S H E A HOMES 1-16-09 Y-3' KIDS ROOM I NOOK LI M,RATH U M. BEDRM I I N! 0 - . --tiiii T 14 OI0 41 7--------------- ----------------- LAU 0 HA 2 AkAG 1- t x 611, 0 BLDRM 2 ------- PD PLAN 2 3 1 59 SQ . FT . � LACOM I? A F, V, S 11 E) IE 147 -08175 SHEA HOMES 1-16-09 s--3- L 44b- IWDRM u CDII II 11P 1,DEI� M.BA FI I PA:ill II m 2 X 20 2 I.-A I'IRM 1'x1 II ---------------------- ---------------- ---------- -NI LAU TIT TIRM 2 -------- - ------- l2k 1.2 -------------- ---------- ----------------- ------ 0 BA DINT G 11 O "NtAG x 12 LA X DR 2 X 1,TTIRARY C:D% 3 Fo 7, PLAN 3 3 , 376 SQ . FT . � LCON1 P A, TZ- K S 1 13 E 147-09175 S H E A HOMES I I I I sr-o^ s•-s^ .w•�^ r-s^ i 4 h N 13nA.2 GP,AND ]G ]M, It I:I)I, '$(\\v/)/j ROOM � -XIOA I F� I II II � I O II I I �yI ['All] II �^ II DINING II $ II GlC 't)G_____ PDR C 1 j ]Y 13A.:i�0 fit(i' O 13A.4 IyI Y H --1 u-e x 5 131i131'M 4 ;r.ORM.S/ - I�'t'.DF_N I II�-X 101 I ____________I I I I I I I (3ARAG' 0 h N I 2S ------ PLAN 4 3 , 704 SQ . FT . ?Io,G AN e LA30NI P l a _ j V 1 1E) E I I 147-08175 SHEA HOMES 1,16-29 , Vic. � �. ..C.-,�.�- ;',°�di',':z.,-✓,,'d;, ,�t�,, ,,'�t� ' c"t,.. .. ��: 45 �,•,x+:' ;',�,-�,.-�;�,�;,".age;:',s-._si:. 'c...°;a, �-; PLAN 1 PL,AN 2 PLAN 3 PLAN 4 SPANISH COTTAGE MONTEREY COTTAGE }� d may:� - }�qy -=a; -.r 's: ��ii pp ,`?, ,���.,'s�,,�<. ,. �• ' p�qq ai y ��� �_ P •eta �. fe�Rf .- f � fM ®Bt ,Ld,} �ra�f �x Fx.C^v p� � 4r��Y r 1� � �`� ' , PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 PLAN 4 MONTEREY SPANISI I COTTAGE SPANISH 411 Se — S a ik r r 14 q �> cFM r-_ I , PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 PLAN 4 COT"1'AGE MONTEREY SPANISI-I MONTEREY iA5�EJ1nN STREETSCENE tivkw P AP., X-- S 1 T y—)L is 7-aat7s >.., S H E A HOMES ATTACHMENT #55 ❖ ❖. ice' •••• as •r:!� ,•eNX'�'�: ' *—MA o t�r�.�.■ii !;.'.���� �y���p.��[±���' 1���� e�S''� \f�"�1�_� NIL '�•/ I ", ra ;!Cii� ��j�,� `�•�, II",, 8,n , �I WA)voo t{ �y �1� �, 1 .—=` u_■I _ ■! ,.- , i■ 1_�f-■II■ a�■�'1— ■� b.,■IPF�I■_�!1`= ` ■Ij■=q l■ 1 ■II■__, C- i Ili r 1"I' I —+I__■ ■►i ■ ■• ■ I { 1 I•. `� ��ovi g 'I �-jj,92,20 d IFrj�1�R�,� FjF- I`r��1 _ +I��r(��IR;�r 1 I'�. Ir�1I "�. r 1� -,.1: Srl207 ������� Lit��Y� ��� 'i: crcrr r.. .�. ! `�.cic■rw-. .. - - -------- - ----- - -- --- -- - ---— --,�,��,r1. 1■ruw� �, •arr s $'-14 � a iA ka Ey �/11' r. �1` ■ ' '�1 \1�" it r, j► ,Zir.Y ,_� b♦ 1� •a® ���� � ,: III �'/ � i� 4 E s1,J� i�`'�` P ;, pyl rkg �.�► �,�� ��11� ,fir ;,c:�LY a 11�P IIIY!I Ilk.ilkP.M r�1 raar � �f�. .�� +— il�rn•r ' .rep! � �' ► !._, �� ��: �� `A♦f rid.( Irna �'� z r /�p�h �,� • Ail• � � �►��� �oYa o�rao�a� iPARESWE ESTAI I PROJECT ENTRY TES TPACT15377 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA ■��� SHEA HOMES i p 1 � T � DUN ii 1-1 f��i Agi*&o�', - ��e �� .�As °!a. • ��� a I :13000011 Al Mill i y ,q ._ 11 " 1�% `" :.� 0� �\� (GIs �� • t�\�. %jam ,�,� ���,�,��r •� � 'i I� u-:- saes 4e®M 7sW M, ;+raw,a�e: I`ti'��'®�A�7��gi®r !y�r®p��pr �9�Y'��ilf�9r '4ffiL1 !►`i�lf8r�131++�A&r1A�41Yaa°�m`7�'�R' �Trl�.�iP.�'�ir �J i O �i Ili I 4 a Id � � II 77 ; I I , I II I; 4 � II� � I� �I 4 Q �y mom # YTANK PAREME ESTATES �no assCCIA—,INC TRACT15377 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA SITE DETAILS SHEA HOMES Tsre —11NA.CA 92111 ATTACHMENT #6 fl VICHYFTY MAP v A -—-—-—-—- —-—-—-—-—-—-KENILWORrH DRIVE �ea 6��VR A-C-1 1 1 HA '2 ?RACF ROUNI- k, V- r IX A- "Up N y (E i ME FOCE 11R-111 A=V9.10 VEW MIX I =P1. MAC) wu "oll N NOT A PART 0 1 VN\ SEC ON A•A fp� -p, M '2 "LEGEND 6'PRIVACY MASONRY WALL SECTION B•B ................... PROPOSED VIEW FENCE PROJECT WALL TRAIL FENCE—DETAIL l--l— tmKwU PROPOSED TRAIL SECURITY/VIEW FENCE WALL ANO FENCE PLAN PROPOSED LOW GARDEN WALL llull"A.KE,�S,ASSOCIATES PROPOSED VARIABLE HEIGHT V RETAINING WALL ATTACHMENT #7 A� C ��- ' j N KENILWORTH DR TnAcr JVD, 10963 TRACT JV0,0702 w w 7, t pv IV Az 1,ARKIAIG SPACES - 195 TOTAL GUEST PARKING SUMMARY qvl. REQUIRED PROVIDED STREET STREET NOT A PART Ell —1) 1. 1.ss n, ia,\%- LEGEND n%NA, P.. 1U ON HYDRANT -Kit& AACEs STREET LIGLIT ADDITi(TIML OFF STRFFT GUES7 PARKING El 1-1 TYPICAL PARKING DIMENSIONS NOT A PART/ aj 19' PARKING SPACES PREPARED FOR PRCPAREO er. PARKING PLAN SHEET IIIWIIW HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATE I REVISED OF SheaHoMeS O�AR V I N E , I N C . TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 15377 NErmNEw BY NNING . ENGINEERING - SURVEYING 9618.PH(949)SIO VR) L94y)-.759 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NO DATE= rLFFED BY-'Ch—hI I DAM Nev 16.-006 1 1116 AM FILL ii"j8,CIji)8 ATTACHMENT #83 Parkside TTM CUP CDP September 26,2002 Page 1 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 96-5A & 96-56 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 96-5A & 513: 1. Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5A and 96-513 represent a change to the Huntington Beach Zoning Map (District Map #33) as follows: 96-5A: Rezone approximately 40 acres of the subject site to add CZ (Coastal Zone Overlay) to the existing FL-FP2 (Low Density Residential — Floodplain Overlay) designation; and rezone 8.2 acres from RA-CZ (Residential Agriculture — Coastal Zone) and RL-FP2 (Low Density Residential) to OS-PR-CZ (Open Space — Parks and Recreation — Coastal Zone); and 96-513: Pre-zone the approximately 4.9 acre County of Orange parcel as follows: approximately 1.6 acres RL-& (Residential Low Density); and approximately 3.3 acres )S-C (Open Space — Conservation). These changes are consistent with the goals, objectives, and land use policies of the General Plan and Local Coastal Program. The proposed changes are consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 98-1 which is being processed concurrently. The land uses in the surrounding area are consistent with the proposed changes in zoning because the surrounding land uses are low density residential and open space. As discussed in the Environmental Impact Report for this project, there will be appropriate infrastructure and services available to support the proposed development. 2. In the case of a general land use provision, the zoning map amendment is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the standards prescribed for, the zoning district for which it is proposed. The changes proposed would be compatible with the uses in the vicinity, which are primarily low density residential. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. The changes would expand the opportunities for housing and address the needs of a growing population. It will also expand the amount of passive and active recreation area, as well as coastal conservation, consistent with the City's General Plan and Local Coastal Program. 4. Its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. The zoning map amendment provides compatible land uses, and passive and active public park space to serve the existing community. (02CL0924 GPA 98-1 ZMA 96-5A&5B LCPA 96-4 ANNEXATION) Attachment 1.1 Parkside TTM CUP CDP September 26, 2002 Page 2 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 96-4 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL— LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 96- 4: 1. Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 96-4 amends the City's certified Local Coastal Program (Land Use Plan and Implementing Ordinances) in accord with General Plan Amendment No. 98-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5A and 96-513. The Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program/Coastal Element (Figure C-2 and associated text) for the subject site is changed from "Area of Deferred Certification" to OS-P (Open Space — Park), approximately 2.8 acres and RL-7 (Low Density Residential — maximum 7 units per acre), approximately 37 acres; and designate an approximate 4.9 acre portion located within the County of Orange as OS-C (Open Space — Conservation), approximately 3.3 acres and RL- 7 (Low Density Residential — maximum 7 units per acre), approximately 1.6 acres. 2. Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 96-4 is in accordance with the policies, standards and provisions of the California Coastal Act relative to residential development, land resources and public access. The Local Coastal Program Amendment promotes the City's Local Coastal Program goals and objectives by allowing low density residential uses, open space areas, and coastal conservation opportunities. 3. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 2 of the California Coastal Act. The General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment expand the amount of open space and conservation areas that will preserve a eucalyptus grove, and preserve and avoid the remnant pickleweed area and the Environmental Protection Agency delineated pocket wetland area in the parcel within the County of Orange. There will be greenbelts and a paseo park to provide opportunities for public access through and between the site. No existing coastal access will be impacted. (02CL0924 GPA 98-1 ZMA 96-5A&5B LCPA 96-4 ANNEXATION) Attachment 1.2 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15377 (City) and 15419 (County) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE MAP NOS. 15377 (City) and 15419 (County): 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 for subdivision of 45 acres into 162 single family residential lots and several lettered lots for open space and landscaped areas is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of RL-7 (Low Density Residential) on the subject property, or other applicable provisions of this Code including the provisions for Planned Unit Developments. Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 for the subdivision of approximately 4.9 acres into nine (9) single family residential lots and lettered lots for open space and landscaped areas is consistent with the pre-General Plan Land Use Element designation of RL-7 (Low Density Residential) on the subject property, or other applicable provisions of this Code including the provisions for Planned Unit Developments. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. The project site is generally flat and able to accommodate the type of development proposed from a circulation and drainage perspective. The site is required to be elevated in compliance with City's requirements for new construction and the Conditional Letter of Map Revision from FEMA approved June 6, 2002 and therefore, requires 263,000 cubic yards of fill. The proposed fill and grade will permit the site to be developed consistent with adopted plans and will result in a density of 4.4 units per acre which is below the allowable density. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The majority of the site has been previously used for farming and does not contain habitat for wildlife or fish. A 3.3 acre portion of the parcel in the County area has an EPA delineated pocket wetland, patchy pickle weed, potential jurisdictional wetlands, and a buffer to residential uses that will be preserved as open space. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. No existing easements for the public at large will be affected by the project. The project will provide public access through the site to the public park and public trails in the vicinity. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 for the development of 171 two-story, detached single family residential units as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for dual-product lot sizes to include 94 lots with minimum 50' frontages and minimum 5,000 sq. ft. lot sizes (average 5,700 sq. ft.); and 77 lots with minimum 60' frontages and minimum 6,000 sq. ft. lot sizes (avg. >7,000 sq. ft.); and seven flag lots with a minimum frontage of 24'; construction of a 8.2 acre park; retaining walls greater than two ft. in height and up to 3.5 ft. in height along the westerly property line adjacent to property within the County of Orange and along flood control channel; and development on a site with a grade differential of greater than three (3) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.1 feet from the low to the high point will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The project will be graded to minimize drainage impacts while complying with the flood requirements of FEMA. The proposed grade differential to adjacent residential properties will be mitigated through the use of substantial landscaped setbacks and tree requirements. The project includes significant infrastructure improvements that will have area wide benefits. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding single family residential and open space land uses. The project includes two-story homes that are similar to the surrounding developments; it also incorporates buffer areas for aesthetics and intensified landscaping. Open space areas are located adjacent to existing open space areas to maximize use and buffers. 3. The proposed project will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Variations to the wall heights are permitted by conditional use permit and lot size and width are allowed as part of a planned unit development. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Low Density Residential on the City portion of the property and pre-General Plan Land Use Element designation of Low Density Residential on the County portion of the property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: Policy 9.2.1: Require that all new residential development within existing residential neighborhoods (i.e., infill) be compatible with existing structures, including the use of building heights, grade elevations, orientation and bulk that are compatible with the surrounding development. The proposed homes are compatible with existing homes in the area in term of style, materials, and colors. The buildings are will articulated and will have enhanced building elevations along street frontages. The building pads are higher but there is a setback buffer along the north property line. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 for the development of a 171-unit single family residential project within an area of deferred certification in the coastal zone as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The project layout is consistent with the existing and proposed Low Density Residential land use designation on the property. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed development complies with all development standards except for the increased retaining wall heights, and the minimum lot width and size. The development will be in compliance with City and FEMA requirements pertaining to floodproofing. (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.2 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. The proposed project will provide all required infrastructure consistent with the Local Coastal Program and City requirements. 4. The development conforms to the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The project will not impact existing public access or recreation opportunities in the coastal zone; the project will add opportunities for access to surrounding trails and a proposed public park and will improve a proposed bikeway adjacent to the channel and the developed portion of the site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15377 (City) AND NO. 15419 (County): 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 and Tentative Tract Map No. 15419, received and dated July 8, 2002, shall be the approved layout except as amended per the conditions stated herein and as follows: a. Lot No. 4 of TTM 15419 shall be eliminated and made part of the adjoining open space area. 2. The final map for Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 (City) shall not be approved by the City Council until Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5 and General Plan Amendment No. 98-1 are approved and in effect, and Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 96-4 has been approved by the California Coastal Commission. 3. The final map for Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 (County) shall not be approved by the City Council until proof that the area has been annexed into the City by LAFCO; and until Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5 and General Plan Amendment No. 98-1 are approved and in effect, and Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 96-4 has been approved by the California Coastal Commission. If the annexation does not occur the "non annexation" alternative layouts shown on Tentative Tract Map 15377 shall be the approved layout. 4. At least 90 days before City Council action on the final map, CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Departments of Planning, Public Works and City Attorney's office for review and approval. The CC&Rs shall include the following: a. Provide for maintenance of all common area landscaping, irrigation, drainage facilities, bike trail links, slopes, walkways and open space areas along Graham Street, surface drainage for lots "B" thru "P" and lots "R" thru "Z" by the Homeowner's Association (HOA). b. Provide for maintenance of slopes, fences and retaining walls that serve as flood control protection, except within the County Flood Control right-of-way. c. Prohibit the blocking or screening of fire hydrants located in public right-of-way. d. Implementation, maintenance and monitoring of the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) including treatment train. The WQMP shall be included in the CC&Rs as an attachment or addendum for conformance with NPDES (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.3 requirements. The CC&Rs shall restrict any revision or amendment of the WQMP except as may be dictated by either local, state or federal law. e. Provide for maintenance and liability of the two bike trails linking the flood control channel with "C" Street and "L" Street. f. Notification to purchasers that there will be a City public park within the tract and that access to Greenleaf is for emergency purposes only. 5. The following conditions shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise stated. Bonding may be substituted for construction in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. (PW) a. The Final Map(s) shall be consistent with the approved Tentative Map. b. Vehicular access rights to all public streets, either proposed or existing, shall be released and relinquished to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the Planning Commission. (PW) c. The rough grading plan and improvement plans shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review. The engineer shall submit cost estimates for determining bond amounts. (PW) d. A final sewer design study of the project system shall be submitted for Public Works approval. The developer shall design the sewer system required to serve the development in conformance with the approved preliminary study and City design criteria. (PW) e. Prior to first plan check submittal, the developer shall submit a water system hydraulic analysis to confirm appropriate on-site sizing and layout. City staff will provide design parameters, including water pressures and flows at points of connection. The hydraulic model output shall conform to City requirements and be fully compatible with and transferable with City software. All costs for water system modeling work shall be borne by the developer. (PW) f. Final hydrology and hydraulic design analysis and calculations for both on and off site drainage facilities shall be submitted for Public Works review and approval. The project improvements shall be consistent with the facilities proposed in the Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) issued by FEMA on June 6, 2002. On-site drainage shall not be diverted or concentrated to adjacent properties, but shall be handled by a Public Works approved method. The final design analysis of the system shall be consistent with the approved preliminary studies. All pad elevations must comply with FEMA design criteria in conformance with the CLOMR (BFE 2.2 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD)) and as directed by the City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works. Gradients of less than 2% shall not be permitted in earthen swales without prior approval from Public Works. (PW) g. The following shall be shown as a dedication to the City of Huntington Beach on the Final Map: (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.4 1) The 8.2 acre public park (Lot "Q" and "A") shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach in fee simple for parkland purposes pursuant to Section 254.08.H. of the HBZSO. The applicant shall submit to the City a Grant Deed, along with a preliminary title report, granting a fee ownership in the parkland unencumbered by any easements or covenants, both recorded and unrecorded, which restrict any and all uses by the City. It shall be the applicant's responsibility as part of the dedication to obtain, record, and submit all necessary quitclaims ensuring a proper dedication. The proposed land shall also be certified clean to the City's Soil Clean-Up Standard, City Specification 431-92 by an acceptable testing firm. Upon acceptance of the Grant Deed language and the submittal of a title insurance policy in an amount equal to the appraised value of the land, the City Clerk, if granted authority as part of the acceptance of the tract map by City Council, shall record the Grant Deed for the parkland dedication. (PW) 2) The domestic water system and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans for this tract. Easement widths shall conform with the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 300. (PW) 3) The sanitary sewer system and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans for this tract. (PW) 4) The storm drain system and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans for this tract, except those facilities designated to be maintained by the HOA on the improvement plans and in the CC&R's. Easement widths shall conform with the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 300. (PW) 5) A 2.00-foot wide public utility easement along both sides of each street, per Standard Plan No. 104. (PW) 6) Graham Street for street purposes. (PW) 7) Greenleaf Lane (Cul-de-sac turn-around) for street purposes. (PW) 8) "A" Street through "M" Street for street purposes. (PW) 9) An easement for public pedestrian access purposes for the two bike trails linking the flood control channel with "L" Street and with "C" Street. 10)An easement for public access purposes 10-feet in width adjacent to or in proximity to the northerly right-of-way of"A" Street and "B" Street within Lot "N", the paseo park. The total width shall be 20-feet as measured from the curb face. h. If necessary, the ultimate Channel right-of-way shall be dedicated on the final map to the County of Orange. (PW) i. All street lighting shall be conveyed to Southern California Edison Co. for maintenance and operation. (PW) j. A reproducible mylar copy and print of the final tract map shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works at the time of recordation. (PW) k. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall comply with Sections 7-9- 330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18 for the following items: (PW) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.5 1) Tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor. 2) Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the County of Orange. I. Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the City per the following criteria: Design Specification: 1) Digital data shall be full size (1:1) and in compliance with the California coordinate system — STATEPLANE Zone 6 (Lambert Conformal Conic projection), NAD 83 datum in accordance with the County of Orange Ordinance 3809. 2) Digital data shall have double precision accuracy (up to fifteen significant digits). 3) Digital data shall have units in US FEET. 4) A separate drawing file shall be submitted for each individual sheet. 5) Digital data shall be in compliance with the Huntington Beach Standard Sheets, drawing names, pen color and layering conventions. 6) Feature compilation shall include, but shall not be limited to: Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN), street addresses and street names with suffix. File Format and Media Specification: 7) Shall be in compliance with the following file format: ➢ AutoCAD (version 13 or later) drawing file: _.DWG 8) Shall be in compliance with the following media type: ➢ CD Recordable (CD-R) 650 Megabytes M. No construction or public access shall be taken from or to Greenleaf for any purpose other than emergency vehicle access. Any future connection of Greenleaf to the development for public street purposes or private access shall be prohibited until otherwise conveyed through a public hearing process before the City Council. n. A Certificate of Insurance shall be filed with the Department of Public Works and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW) o. All improvement securities (Faithful Performance, Labor& Material and Monumentation Bonds) and Subdivision Agreement shall be posted with the Department of Public Works and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW) p. All Public Works fees shall be paid. (PW) q. An Affordable Housing Agreement Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The agreement shall provide for affordable housing on-site or off-site. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract. The contents of the agreement shall include the following: (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.6 1) Minimum10 percent of the units shall be affordable to families of low-income level (less than 80% of Orange County median)for a period of thirty years. 2) A detailed description of the type, size, location and phasing of the affordable units. 3) If affordable units (new or rehabilitate) are off-site, they must be under the full control of the applicant. 4) The affordable units shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with the primary project. Final approval (occupancy) of the first residential unit in the tract shall be contingent upon the completion and public availability, or evidence of the applicant's reasonable progress towards attainment of completion, of the affordable units. (MM) 5. The following conditions are required to be completed prior to issuance of Grading Permits: a. A Grading Plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Final grades and elevations on the grading plan shall not vary by more than one (1)foot from the grades and elevations on the approved Tentative Map unless otherwise required by these conditions and shall conform to FEMA requirements for elevation above the flood water levels as directed by the Department of Public Works. The recommendations from Section 7.0 and 8.0 of the geotechnical study, Appendix E of the EIR, shall be incorporated into the earthwork activities. (MM) The following public improvements shall be shown on the plan: i. Class I bike trail and adjacent lot slopes along the channel. (PW) ii. Two bike trails linking the flood control channel with "C" Street and "L" Street. iii. All slopes, sea walls, and drainage control devices along the westerly boundary of the development. (PW) iv. The owner shall submit of"Notice of Intent" (NOI), along with the required fee, to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in compliance with NPDES general construction permit requirements. Copies of the NOI and the written replies received from the SWRCB shall be submitted to the City. (PW-MM) b. Sewer lateral for each habitable lot. (PW) c. All structures over twenty feet (20') in height from the point of connection at the public water source shall require a backflow protection device on the domestic water service unless otherwise approved by the Water Division. (PW) d. A separate irrigation service, meter and backflow protection device shall be required for the park. Additional irrigation services, meters and backflow devices shall be required for any Homeowner Association (HOA) landscaping. (PW) e. Each proposed dwelling unit shall require a separate domestic water meter and service. All domestic water meters shall be sized in accordance with the California Plumbing Code (CPC) and the requirements of the City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works and the Fire Department. (PW/FD) f. Plans for EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS at Greenleaf/LOT R shall be submitted and approved by the fire and planning departments. Indicate gate location, method to secure, slope, and overall final elevation change. (FD) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.7 g. Final finished grade for the park shall be subject to the approval of the Departments of Public Works and Community Services. The final finished grade shall, at a minimum: i. Protect existing trees, meet police department visibility requirements, provide proper drainage, meet conditions for maintaining a playable park and provide a drainage interceptor at the toe of the existing slope that transports run off to the storm drain system prior to entering the playable park area. (PW) ii. The finish grade in the City park site shall be raised with a City approved topsoil. (PW) iii. The slope of the soil grade adjacent to "H" and "I" street shall be 5:1 max to a low point of 5.0 FT to 7.0 above sea level. The park shall then drain (slope) toward the existing "treed" slope at a minimum of 1% and maximum 2% to a drainage swale at the top of said existing slope. A grade break may occur in closer proximity with the drainage swale and the grade to the swale can be 5:1 maximum or an acceptable solution approved by the Park, Tree and Landscape Division. (PW) iv. The gradient and configuration of the emergency access road shall be approved by Public Works and Fire. (PW/FD) V. A separate lot shall be created for the existing "treed" slope area and shall extend from the western property boundary to the top of the slope at the concrete drainage swale, and from the north property line following the concrete swale south to the H.O.A. maintained lot "P". (PW) h. The Developer shall design and construct a new wet well/dry well sewer lift station and force main as required by the City to replace the existing station in Graham. The new station shall be sized to accommodate existing and the proposed development flows. The existing station shall be abandoned in-place by the developer as directed by The Department of Public Works. The used pumps/controllers shall be returned to the City Yard. The design of the lift station shall comply with all design requirements and criteria of the City of Huntington Beach. (PW) i. The Developer shall design and construct the ultimate improvements to centerline of the East Garden Grove -Wintersburg Channel (C05) per County of Orange Flood Control District's adopted design standards (sheet pile and cathodic protection, or an equivalent lining if approved by the County). Said channel improvements shall be constructed along the entire project site frontage, extending under Graham Street bridge and transitioning out on the east side of the Graham Street bridge, as directed by the County. Requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers shall be observed in the design and construction of all channel and abutting slope improvements in and adjacent to the channel. Additionally, the Developer shall remove the existing oil-field access bridge over the County channel westerly of the Slater Pump Station, unless otherwise directed by the County of Orange. (PW) j. The Developer shall install two (2) new pump systems (motor, pump, controls, heat exchanger, and necessary appurtenances)within the existing vacant pump bays in the Slater Pump Station as determined necessary (equipment to match/equal City specification). Subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, a request for fee credits may be considered for improvements exceeding the developer's required project impact mitigation. The value of each existing pump bay to be utilized shall be considered to be $300,000 unless it is proven to the satisfaction of the City Engineer (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.8 to be a different amount. The developer will be required to make capacity improvements to the system as necessary to drain the subject development and tributary flows to the site as required by the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall also obtain necessary written approvals from the County of Orange and other pertinent agencies as required prior to issuance of grading permits. (PW/MM) k. The Developer shall design and construct off-site drainage improvements as required by the Department of Public Works to mitigate impact of increased runoff, as well as conveyance of ultimate upstream flows or deficient, downstream drainage systems. Design of all necessary drainage improvements shall provide mitigation for all rainfall event frequencies up to a 100-year frequency. The Developer shall provide the necessary hydrologic and hydraulic studies as required to justify final pad elevations on the site in conformance with the latest FEMA requirements, and to update that portion of the City's Master Plan of Drainage to reflect the changes and improvements of this project in the plan. If earthen slopes and/or levee protection is constructed along lots on the southwest perimeter of the property, the design shall conform to the FEMA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Design Guidelines (most specifically USACOE Manual EM 1110-2-1913.)Among the items of design criteria to be included . are the following: (PW) i. The top of levee or berm shall be wide enough to accommodate a 12- foot wide clear access for maintenance vehicles. Drainage swales and flow lines along the brow of the levee shall not be within the 12-foot travel area. If seawalls are incorporated into the design, drainage swale flow lines be a minimum of 18-inches from the wall and shall be concrete gutters. ii. The waterside of the levee shall be 3:1 or flatter with riprap or similar slope protection, or 4:1 or flatter without hard slope protection. Seawalls in combination with slopes may be used as approved by the City. iii. The landside of the levee shall be 4:1 or flatter to minimize seepage and permit easy maintenance by homeowner. iv. The levee design shall include a seepage barrier. If sheet piles are employed, no seepage barrier is required. Transitions from sheet piling to earthen berms shall be concrete lined. V. A vehicle turnaround with a turning radius or hammerhead design consistent with maintenance vehicles criteria shall be provided at the end of the levee maintenance road unless otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. vi. The top of levee and/or sea wall shall maintain a minimum elevation of 11 feet or 1-foot of freeboard above the committed water surface elevation in the channel, whichever is greater The top of levee and/or sea wall shall tie into the existing topography to prohibit a breach or intrusion into the subdivision from seawater high tide events or storm flows. (PW) I. Storm Drain, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) conforming with the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.9 review and approval. The plans shall also be submitted to Orange County Coastkeeper for review and comment. Catch basins shall be grated and not have side openings. (PW) i. To the greatest extent feasible, low flow urban runoff from the properties to the north shall be directed to a gross pollutant removal device. The developer shall investigate use of the remainder of the southwest open space area within Tract 15419 for treatment of this runoff. ii. Gross pollutant removal devices (CDS or equivalent)for the removal of debris, sediment, oil and water separation, etc., shall be installed as part of the treatment train for the main line systems. Access to these devices for maintenance shall be provided and included within an easement to the City. iii. If deemed feasible by the City Engineer, the developer shall design and construct a low flow urban runoff treatment train for flows from the Slater Pump Station, which may be conveyed to the potential open space southwest of the project area. If deemed not feasible by the City Engineer, this requirement may be waived. iv. A SWPPP shall be prepared and updated as needed during the course of construction to satisfy the requirements of each phase of the development. The plan shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMP's) and other City requirements to eliminate polluted runoff until all construction work for the project is completed. V. A WQMP shall be prepared, maintained and updated as needed to satisfy the requirements of the adopted NPDES program. The plan shall incorporate water quality measures for all improved or unimproved phases of the project. All structural BMP's shall be sized to infiltrate, filter, or treat the 85-percentile 24-hour storm event or the maximum flow rate of runoff produced from a rainfall intensity of 0.2 inches per hour. The WQMP shall include an extensive Home Owner's Association education program, including information booklets and packages for each homeowner, and periodic informational programs to keep owners current with WQMP practices and requirements. (PW) m. Existing mature trees that are to be removed must be replaced at a 2 for 1 ratio with a 36" box tree or palm equivalent (13'-14' of trunk height for Queen Palms and 8'-9' of brown trunk). Applicant shall provide a consulting arborist report on all the existing trees. Said report shall quantify, identify, size and analyze the health of the existing trees. The report shall also recommend how the existing trees that are to remain (if any) shall be protected and how far construction/grading shall be kept from the trunk. (PW) n. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan, prepared by a Licensed Landscape Architect, shall be submitted to the Departments of Public Works and Planning for review and approval. The Landscape Construction Set shall identify the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials; an irrigation plan; a grading plan; an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The plan shall include irrigation demands to ensure proper irrigation service sizing. (PW) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.10 o. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines. The plan shall include all common areas, the proposed City Park, Graham Street setback area, and the paseo park. The paseo park along the north property line shall include intensified landscaping to further screen possible headlight intrusion. In addition, Lot "B" of TTM 15419 shall consist of non-invasive, native drought tolerant plant material without a permanent irrigation systems. (PW/MM/Code Requirement) p. An erosion and silt control plan for all water runoff during construction and site preparation work. (PW/MM) q. Street Improvement Plans for Graham Street shall be prepared per the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 103, (80764'), and submitted for review and approval. The developer shall include the following modifications to achieve the minimum number of travel lanes specified and include any additional striping modifications identified by the Transportation Manager to best accommodate specific traffic operations (PW/MM): i. Improve Graham Street, as needed, to correct the stopping sight distance and stacking problems between the southerly crosswalk across Graham at Street "A" and the crest of the Wintersburg Channel Bridge as approved by the Department of Public Works. ii. Restripe Graham Street from Street "A" to Glenstone Drive with a seven (7)foot bike lane in each direction, one twelve (12)foot through lane in each direction, and a fourteen (14) foot painted two-way left turn median. iii. Restripe Graham Street northerly from Street "A" as directed by the Department of Public Works, to transition with a seven (7)foot bike lane in each direction, one eighteen (18)foot through lane in each direction, and a fourteen (14)foot painted two-way left turn median. A protected left turn pocket on Graham Street, (northbound to westbound) shall be provided with appropriate tapers in accordance with the design speed, (50 mph). Signage shall be added to the intersection of Graham Street and Kenilworth Circle to keep intersection clear. r. Internal public streets shall be designed and constructed as follows (PW): i. All street grades shall have a minimum gradient of 0.50%. ii. Street "A" ("Entry Street") shall be designed and constructed per the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 104 modified, (56736). A dedicated left turn lane and dedicated right turn lane (within 26' from median island to outer curb face) exiting onto Graham Street shall be provided. A 15-foot wide median island shall be constructed at the entry. No parking or driveway openings will be permitted on Street "A" from Graham Street to Street "D". iii. Street "B" shall be designed and constructed per the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 104 modified (56736)with a 10-foot parkway on each side. iv. Streets "C" thru "M," shall be designed and constructed per the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 104 Modified, (48'/36'). (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.11 V. Parking layout shall conform to City Standards and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code requirements, including Municipal Ordinance No. 10.40.050. Thirty (30) parking spaces shall be provided for park parking above the count required for residential lot guest parking. No on-street parking shall be permitted adjacent to emergency access areas in compliance with Fire Department Standard Specification 401 and 415. vi. Curb, gutter and sidewalk along all street frontages, per City Standard Plan Nos. 202 and 207. vii. An ADA compliant access ramp at the corners of all street intersections. s. Access for the handicapped in conformance with Title 24, shall be provided from the public sidewalk into the public park at the northerly and southerly ends. t. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer that standards (including ADA) regarding pedestrian/bicycle safety along the perimeter sidewalks will be met. (MM) u. The developer shall design and install signing and striping plans in accordance with Public Works Standards. (PW) v. The Developer shall design and install Southern California Edison owned street lighting. The plan shall include the height, location, and intensity of streetlights on- site. Street light spacing shall be in conformance with City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan 411. (PW) w. A traffic signal shall be designed and constructed for the intersection of Street"A" and Graham Street. (MM) x. Traffic Control Plans, prepared by a Licensed Civil or Traffic Engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval, for work within the City's right- of-way. (PW) y. A licensed engineer shall prepare a detailed soils and geological/seismic analysis. This analysis shall provide detailed recommendations for grading, over excavation, engineered fill, dewatering, settlement, protection of adjacent existing structures, landscaping, chemical and fill properties, liquefaction requirements, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. Said report shall certify that post development ground water conditions shall not be affected or affect improvements. (Precise grading plan only). The developer shall provide a minimum of four(4) agricultural soil tests for fertility and suitability within the park area prior to developing a finish-grading plan. In addition, a geotechnical expert shall be on-site daily during dewatering to monitor soil conditions. (PW) Z. If soil remediation is required, a remediation plan shall be submitted to the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments for review and approval in accordance with City Specifications No. 431-92 and the conditions of approval. The plan shall include methods to minimize remediation-related impacts on the surrounding properties; details on how all drainage associated with the remediation efforts shall be retained on site and no wastes or pollutants shall escape the site; and shall also identify wind barriers around remediation equipment. (PW) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.12 aa. Soil imported for park area shall be approved by the City Landscape Architect. The developer shall employ a soil test lab approved by the City Landscape Architect to obtain and test soils that are to be utilized in raising the grade of the proposed park area. After a topsoil source is approved, the developer shall guarantee that said soil is delivered to the site and used on the park. (PW) bb. For import soils, the project shall comply with all provisions of the HBMC Section 17.04.085 and Fire Dept. City Specification 429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. (FD) cc. Provide proof that all site soil meets the requirements found in the City of Huntington Beach Soil Cleanup Standard, City Specification No. 431-92. (FD) dd. The Fire Department must be notified of who will be the environmental site auditor supervising testing operations during soil import. The selected environmental firm is responsible for obtaining Fire Department approval for their testing plan. (FD) ee. The name and phone number of an on-site field supervisor hired by the developer shall be submitted to the Departments of Planning and Public Works. In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on Graham Street every 250 feet, and at Greenleaf Lane indicating who shall be contacted for information regarding this development and any construction/grading-related concerns. This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity. He/She will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities, truck routes, construction hours, noise, etc. Signs shall include the applicant's contact number, City contact (Construction Manager(714) 536-5431) regarding grading and construction activities, and "1-800-CUTSMOG" in the event there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No. 403. (PW) ff. The applicant shall notify all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property of a tentative grading schedule at least 30 days prior to such grading. (PW) gg. The developer shall coordinate with the Department of Public Works, Traffic Engineering Division in developing a truck and construction vehicle routing plan. This plan shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction related impacts to adjacent residents. These plans must be submitted for approval to the Department of Public Works. (PW/MM) hh. A grading/erosion control plan shall be completed and must abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control; and provide a plan to the Department of Public Works indicating such compliance. (PW) ii. Block wall/fencing plans (including a site plan, section drawings, and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls, walls, and fences) consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. Double walls shall be prohibited. Prior to construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls next to (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.13 the new walls, and shall include approval by property owners of adjacent properties. The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage. The new wall depicted along the northerly property line shall be removed; no new wall is necessary. jj. If grading occurs during the normal breeding season for the red-tailed hawk and other raptors locally, (March to July), a survey shall be conducted for active nests. Should active nests be located within the zone of potential disturbance due to grading or construction activities, work shall be limited to areas 500 feet away from the nest until the young have fledged and have begun foraging away from the nest site. The 500-foot protection zone shall be fenced with visible warning-color materials. Nest trees shall be removed during the non-breeding season only. (MM) kk. The property owner shall conduct a subsurface test investigation for CA-ORA-1308 and 1309 to determine the horizontal boundaries of the sites as well as to confirm the surface conclusions of non-significance as indicated in the March, 1997 Archeological Assessment. This may be accomplished though the mechanical excavation of a number of auger holes as well as two (2) 1x1 meter hand excavated units for stratigraphic control. The subsurface test investigation (including a discussion of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of resources), final mitigation recommendations and cost estimates shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. A cultural resource management plan based on the test results shall be developed. (MM) II. The property owner shall provide written evidence that a certified archaeologist has been retained and shall be present at the pre-grading meeting/conference, shall establish procedures for archaeological resource surveillance, and shall establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification and evaluation of the artifacts as appropriate. The archaeological resource surveillance procedures shall include a provision for Native American review of grading operations. (MM) mm. A bikeway plan shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach's Departments of Planning and Public Works, in consultation with the Manager of the County PFRD/HBP Program Management and Coordination, for approval of consistency with the Orange County Bikeway Plan. (MM) nn. The applicant shall submit and have approved a noise mitigation plan to the Department of Planning that will reduce or mitigate short-term noise impacts to nearby noise sensitive. The plan shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance and shall include, but not be limited to (MM): 1) Criteria of acceptable noise levels based on type and length of exposure to construction noise levels; 2) Physical reduction measures such as temporary noise barriers that provide separation between the source and the receptor; temporary soundproof structures to house portable generators; and 3) Temporary generators (if utilized) shall be located as far as practical from sensitive noise receptors. 4) Mitigation measures such as restrictions on the time of construction for activities resulting in high noise levels. oo. The applicant shall be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion into the project grading permit. Measures, subject (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.14 to the approval and verification by the Department of Public Works, shall include, as appropriate (MM): 1) Provision of rideshare incentives. 2) Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. 3) Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. 4) Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. 5) Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. pp. The applicant shall produce evidence acceptable to the City Engineer that: (MM) 1) All grading and construction vehicles and equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation. 2) Stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. 3) All operations shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. qq. The applicant shall produce evidence (specifications) acceptable to the City Engineer that the new walls, if constructed, along the project's northern property (along the rear property line of lot#103 to lot#123 on Kenilworth Drive and the side property lines of lots #125 and #126 on Greenleaf Lane of Tract 5792) and Graham Street (along the project's boundary)will be constructed to achieve maximum sound attenuation. (MM) rr. The recommendations contained in Section 7.0 of the geotechnical study, located in Appendix E of the EIR shall be incorporated into the earthwork activities of the proposed project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Earthwork activities include grading, clearing and demolition, site preparation, unsuitable soil removals, backcuts, excavation processing, compaction of all fills, mixing, benching, inspection, survey control, subgrade preparation, cut and fill slope construction, haul roads, import soils, structural load and settlement/subsidence measures, and storm drain relocation. (MM) ss. The applicant shall contract with a dewatering expert to prepare a detailed Dewatering Plan. This plan shall include the placement of monitoring wells near the northern property line to evaluate ground water levels during the proposed project dewatering activities. The dewatering activities shall be adjusted immediately if the monitoring wells show ground water level changes which may effect subsidence of adjacent properties. The Dewatering Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. (MM) tt. A Phase II environmental soil sampling shall be conducted to determine the residual levels of pesticides in the soil. If inappropriate/unsafe levels are identified by this analysis, "clean up" measures shall be recommended and implemented. The Phase II sampling and any necessary measures shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. (MM) uu. The applicant shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan showing conformance to the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and all NPDES requirements (enacted by the EPA)for review and approval by the City Engineer. (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.15 The plan shall reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practical using management practices, control techniques and systems, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions which are appropriate. (MM) vv. The developer shall submit a hydraulic computer water model analysis for the development proposed on the City parcel, which addresses the following: 1) Water demand required by project (fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Department) 2) Master Plan/General Plan Amendment (GPA) review 3) The City of Huntington Beach Water(Master Plan) System Computer Model (i.e. H2ONET) must be run with the proposed land use demands (i.e. GPA), and contrasted with the model run using the existing land use demands, (i.e. the General Plan, in effect at the time the Water Master Plan was adopted). 4) The City of Huntington Beach Water Division must be contracted to perform this analysis on the existing City of Huntington Beach Water System Model (H2ONET), for a fee to be paid by the developer a minimum of 30 days in advance. If the analysis shows that project demands cannot be met with the City's current water system, the developer shall be required to upgrade the City's system to meet the demands and/or otherwise mitigate the impacts of the project at no cost to the City. (MM) ww. Irrigation systems within the Park, which minimize water waste, shall be used to the greatest extent possible. Such measures should involve, where appropriate, the following features: 1) Raised planters and berming in conjunction with closely spaced low volume, low angle (22 '/2 degree) sprinkler heads. 2) Drip irrigation 3) Irrigation systems controlled automatically to ensure watering during early morning or evening hours to reduce evaporation losses. 4) The use of reclaimed water for irrigated areas and grasslands. The project applicants shall connect to the Orange County Water District's "Green Acres" system of reclaimed water should this supply of water be available. Separate irrigation services shall be installed to ease this transition. 6. During demolition, grading, site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available to be used throughout the day during site grading and construction to keep the soil damp enough to prevent dust being raised by the operations and when leaving the site. Wet the area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust pick up by the wind; spread soil binders; and implement street sweeping as necessary. (MM) b. All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 8:00 a.m. or leave the site no later than 5:00 p.m., and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only. (PW) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.16 c. During construction, the area shall be wet down in the late morning and after work is completed for the day(MM). d. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose substances and building materials shall be covered, or to maintain a minimum freeboard of two feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. (MM) e. Prior to leaving the site, all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site on a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets. Install vehicle wheel-washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites (MM) f. Where feasible, pervious paving materials shall be used to reduce surface water runoff. (MM) g. Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas. (PW) h. Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site. (PW) i. The remediation operations shall be performed in stages concentrating in single areas at a time to minimize the impact of fugitive dust and noise on the surrounding areas. (PW) j. Comply with the "Water Quality Management Plan" requirements. (PW) k. Discovery of additional contamination/pipelines, etc., must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly. Discovery of contaminated soil and/or abandoned oil wells require immediate fire department notification. All project processes in the immediate discovery area shall cease until approved plans are in place. (FD) I. Construction equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation, maintain equipment engines in proper tune. Truck idling shall be prohibited for periods longer than 10 minutes (MM) m. Use low sulfur(0.05% by weight)fuel by weight for construction equipment (MM). n. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts (MM). o. A phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily emissions shall be complied with. Treat unattended construction areas with water(disturbed lands which have been, or are expected to be unused for four or more consecutive days). Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. p. The planting of vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on construction sites shall be required. Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion from storm water especially on super pads (MM) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.17 q. On-site parking shall be provided for all construction workers and equipment unless approved otherwise by the Department of Public Works. (PW) r. Enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of sand, dirt, or other aggregate materials shall be required. (MM) s. The construction disturbance area shall be kept as small as possible. Control off-road vehicle travel by posting driving speed limits on these roads, consistent with City standards. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators when practical. The applicant shall be responsible for assuring that vehicle movement on any unpaved surface other than water trucks shall be terminated if wind speeds exceed 15 mph. (MM) t. Compliance with all Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code requirements including the Noise Ordinance. All activities including truck deliveries associated with construction, grading, remodeling, or repair shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Such activities are prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. (Code Requirement) u. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. v. The property owner is responsible for all required clean up of off-site dirt, pavement damage and/or restriping of the public rights-of-way as determined by the Department of Public Works. (PW) w. The property owner shall be responsible for paving all access aprons to the project site and for the maintenance of the paving. (MM) x. The property owner shall be responsible for incorporating measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion with the implementation of rideshare incentives, transit incentives, construction area parking, use of flagmen, and implementation of measures to minimize the obstruction of through traffic lanes, as deemed appropriate by Public Works. (MM) y. The project shall provide easy access into and within the project site for emergency vehicles and addresses shall be well marked to facilitate response by officers. Prior to the first final inspection, project site plans depicting these requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Police Department. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS -TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15377 & 15419: 1. Tentative Map No. 15377 and 15419 shall be valid for two (2) years of the date of final approval which is from the time the Local Coastal Program Amendment for the area is deemed certified by the California Coastal Commission. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 60 days prior to the expiration date. (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.18 2. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 3. All applicable fees shall be paid from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments fees prior to map recordation. (PW) 4. All new and existing overhead utilities shall be installed underground in accordance with the City's Underground Utility Ordinance. In addition, all electrical transformers shall be installed underground. Aboveground transformers may be allowed due to certain groundwater conditions and shall be approved by the City Engineer and City Landscape Architect. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated July 8, 2002 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. Lot No. 4 of TTM 15419 shall be deleted. b. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way. Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. (Code Requirement) c. Individual building site plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Departments of Planning and Public Works. The final building layout shall be within the building envelope as depicted on the Building Envelope Plan. (MM) d. 25% of the minimum 60 foot wide lots must have side entry garages and/or garages located to the rear of the lot. e. Increase interior side yards (minimum 10')when adjacent to the rear yard of an adjoining lot. f. Stagger the front yard setback for garages (i.e., from two to four feet between all units) within the two subdivisions or develop another alternative to vary the street scene. g. Depict the location of all gas meters, water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units, mailboxes (as approved by the United States Postal Service), and similar items on the site plan and elevations. If located on a building, they shall be architecturally designed into the building to appear as part of the building. They shall be architecturally compatible with the building and non-obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required setbacks. h. If outdoor lighting is included, energy saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. (MM) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.19 2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. Submit three (3) copies of the site plan and floor plans and the processing fee to the Planning Department for addressing purposes after street name approval by the Fire Department. (FD) c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) d. To maintain required emergency access and site safety during project construction phases, submit a Fire Protection Plan in compliance with City Specification #426-Fire Safety Requirements for Construction Sites. (FD) e. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification #401-Minimum Access for Fire Department Access. (FD) f. Fire hydrants must be installed and be in service before combustible construction begins. Shop drawings shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Fire Department. Indicate hydrant locations and fire department connections. The Fire Department and the Public Works Water Division have determined the number of fire hydrants for the 161 Lot Plan to be 14 and the 171 Lot Plan to be 15. (FD) g. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed throughout each unit. For Fire Department approval, plans shall be submitted to the Building Department as separate plans for permits (FD). h. A fire alarm system in compliance with Huntington Beach Fire Code is required. For Fire Department approval, shop drawings shall be submitted to Building as separate plans for permits. The system shall provide water flow, tamper, and trouble alarms, manual pull stations, interior and exterior horns and strobes, voice communication, and 24-hour central station monitoring. (FD) i. Street names must be approved by the Fire Department. Please refer to City Specification #409-Street Naming Process, Public or Private. (FD) j. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a Licensed Soils Engineer and submitted with the building permit application. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding: grading, foundations, retaining walls, streets, utilities, and chemical and fill properties of underground items including buried pipe and concrete and the protection thereof.(BD) k. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.20 anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. (Code Requirement) I. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters and central heating units. m. Contact the United States Postal Service for approval of mailbox location(s). n. The recommendations contained in Section 8.0 of the geotechnical study, located in Appendix E of the EIR, shall be incorporated into the structural design of the proposed project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Structural design activities include: Foundation Design; Settlements including Foundation Loads and Seismically Induced Settlements; Post-Tensioned Slab/ Foundations; Mat Foundations; Other Foundation Recommendations such as Footing Embedment, Underslab Treatment, and Subgrade Moisture Content; Concrete Driveways, Sidewalks, and Flatwork; Structural Setbacks; Retaining Walls; Other Design and Construction Recommendations such as Lot Drainage, Utility Excavations, Utility Trench Backfill, Corrosion, Metallic Structures, and Concrete Structures.(MM) o. It shall be proven to the City that all structures are designed in accordance with the seismic design provisions of the Uniform Building Codes or Structural Engineers Association of California to promote safety in the event of an earthquake.(MM) p. Building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. If during the Fire Department's plan check it becomes evident that fireground operations will become impeded, the department will impose additional fire code requirements in addition to the automatic sprinkler systems, alarm systems, access roads, etc. (MM) 3. The following conditions shall be completed prior to issuance of Building Permits: a. Prior to the construction of infrastructure facilities incorporating Tract 15419, proof shall be shown from L.A.F.C.O., for approval of annexation of Tract 15419 into the City of Huntington Beach, subject to approvals from Departments of Planning and Public Works. b. Submit a copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file to the Planning Department; and submit 8 inch by 10 inch colored photographs of all colored renderings, elevations, materials sample board, and massing model to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file. c. A grading permit shall be issued. (PW) d. The final Tract Map shall be recorded with the County of Orange and a copy filed with the Planning Department. (PW/Code Requirement) e. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the (02c►0924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.21 Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials; an irrigation plan; a grading plan; an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The plan shall include all common areas, the proposed City Park, Graham Street setback area, and the paseo park. The paseo park along the north property line shall include intensified landscaping to further screen possible headlight intrusion. In addition, Lot"B" of TTM 15419 shall consist of non-invasive, native drought tolerant plant material without a permanent irrigation systems. (PW) f. The Consulting Arborist (approved by the City Landscape Architect) shall review the final landscape tree planting plan and approve in writing the selection and locations proposed for new trees and the protection measures and locations of existing trees to remain. Existing trees to remain shall also be addressed by said Arborist with recommendations/requirements for protection during construction. Said Arborist report shall be incorporated onto the Landscape Architect's plans as construction notes and/or construction requirements. The report shall include the Arborist's name, certificate number and the Arborist's wet signature on the final plan. (PW) g. An interim parking and building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department to assure adequate parking and restroom facilities are available for employees, customers and contractors during the project's construction phase and that adjacent properties will not be impacted by their location. The plan shall also be reviewed and approved by the Departments of Fire and Public Works. The applicant shall obtain any necessary encroachment permits from the Department of Public Works. (PW) h. A copy of a Letter of Map Revision from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) removing the property(ies) from the floodplain shall be submitted to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file. Or submit a copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificate(s) based on construction drawings, or Floodproofing Certificate in the case on a non-residential structure, for each building. i. The project applicant shall implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding storm drainage improvements which shall include, but not be limited to (MM): 1) Construct the necessary storm drainage improvements (identified on Exhibit 42 within the EIR) to handle increased flows and intercept off-site flows 2) Ensure that future building pads are placed at elevations suitable to withstand 100- year flood. 3) Construct the necessary improvements to the East Garden Grove—Wintersburg Channel (C05) along the site perimeter k. The applicant shall show proof of compliance with the Mitigation Agreement established between the Huntington Beach Union High School District, subject to the approval of the City of Huntington Beach. (MM) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.22 I. Pervious paving material shall be used whenever feasible to reduce surface water runoff and aid in groundwater recharge and slopes and grades shall be controlled to discourage water waste through runoff. (MM) m. The property owner shall construct the new sewer lift station and force main in accordance with the City-approved Sewer Plan for the proposed project, and implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding sewer infrastructure improvements to handle increased sewer flow demands. (MM) n. The Southern California Gas Company or designated natural gas provider shall be consulted with during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. (MM) o. SCE shall be consulted with during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. (MM) 4. The structure(s) cannot be occupied, the final building permit(s) cannot be approved, and utilities cannot be released for the first residential unit until the following has been completed: a. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed. (PW) b. Landscape irrigation and planting installation shall be certified to be in conformance to the City approved landscape plans by the Landscape Architect of Record in written form to the City Landscape Architect prior to the final landscape inspection and approval. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed. (PW) c. The applicant shall provide proof that energy saving features have been installed in project homes as required by the Uniform Building Code. Features may include: solar or low-emission water heaters, energy efficient appliances, double-glass paned windows, low-sodium parking lights, etc. (MM) d. The public park shall be completed other than the one year maintenance period at the request of 50% occupancy(or by the 95th home Certificate of Occupancy). (PW) e. All public infrastructure must be completed per the approved plans. (PW) f. All improvements must be completed per the approved grading plans. (PW) g. The applicant shall be responsible for improving Graham Street in accordance with the approved signing and striping plan. (PW/MM) h. All landscape irrigation and planting installation shall be certified to be in conformance to the City-approved landscape plans by the Landscape Architect of record in written form to the City Landscape Architect prior to the final landscape inspection and approval. (PW) i. Applicant shall provide the City with Microfilm copies (in City format) and CD (AutoCAD only) copy of complete City approved landscape construction drawings as stamped "Permanent File Copy" prior to starting landscape work. Copies shall be given to the City Landscape Architect for permanent City record. (PW) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.23 j. Automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed throughout. Shop drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to system installation. (FD) k. Fire hydrants must be installed before combustible construction begins. Prior to installation, shop drawings shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department. (Fire Dept. City Specification 407) (FD) I. Backflow protection shall be constructed per the Huntington Beach Water Division Standards Plans for irrigation and fire suppression water services. m. Address numbers shall be installed on structures to comply with Fire Dept. City Specification 428. (FD) n. Secondary emergency access gates must be secured with KNOX and association (if any) hardware. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with Fire Dept. City Specification 401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. Fire lanes will be designated and posted to comply with Fire Dept. City Specification No. 415. (FD) o. Service roads and fire access lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted, marked, and maintained per City Specification #415-Fire Lane Signs. If prior to approved signage fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant may be liable for related expenses. (FD) p. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. q. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. r. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. s. A second Elevation Certificate certifying the "as built" lowest floor for each building shall be submitted to the Planning Department, or a Letter of Map Revision shall be issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and submitted to the Planning Department. (Code Requirement) t. All drainage, pump station and channel improvements consistent with the facilities identified in the FEMA CLOMR, dated June 6, 2002, shall be completed in place and operational. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA shall be obtained by the developer following completion of the improvements. (PW) u. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with Fire Dept. City Specification 401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. v. The project shall comply with all provisions of the Huntington Beach Fire Code and Fire Dept. City Specification 422, Well Abandonment. w. The project shall comply with all provisions of the HBMC Section 17.04.085 and Fire Dept. City Specification 429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.24 x. The applicant shall provide proof to the City's Traffic Engineer that the project has contributed its 'fair-share' towards regional traffic improvement systems (i.e., traffic impact fees)for the area. This shall include efforts to synchronize traffic lights on streets impacted by project development.(MM) y. Testing to verify the estimated radon gas levels shall be implemented as deemed necessary by the Department of Planning(MM) z. The following water conservation measures shall be implemented as required by state law: 1) Ultra-low-flush toilets 2) Ultra-low-flow showers and faucets 3) Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating systems 4) Compliance with water conservation provisions of the appropriate plumbing code (MM) aa. Water pressure regulators to limit downstream pressure to a maximum of 60 psi shall be installed. (MM) bb. The applicant shall provide information to prospective residents regarding benefits of low water use landscaping and sources of additional assistance in selecting irrigation and landscaping. (MM) cc. The development shall comply with all applicable Mitigation Measures in Environmental Impact Report No. 97-2 and New Alternatives to EIR No. 97-2. 5. The Departments of Planning, Public Works and Fire are responsible for compliance with all conditions of approval herein as noted after each condition. The Planning Director and Public Works Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to tract map are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director and Public Works Director have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission's may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. 6. Prior to finalization of the Tract or exoneration of the Guarantee Bond, maintenance for the City Park (Lot A) shall be for a period of 12 months after the 90-day plant establishment period. The Park may open at the beginning of maintenance period. (PW) 7. Service roads and fire access lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted, marked, and maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. (FD) 8. A public art element shall be integrated and be in a location that is visible to the public within the Parkside Estates residential project. Public art shall incorporate the following: a) Artistic excellence and innovation b) Appropriate to the design of the project c) Indicative of the community's cultural identity(ecology, history, society) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.25 The public art element shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board, the Planning Director, and the Cultural Services Division Manager prior to issuance of any building permit for the project. The public art shall be in place at the subject site prior to final building inspection. 9. This TTM and CUP and CDP shall not become effective until GPA 98-1, Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5A & 5B, and LCPA No. 96-4 has been approved by the City Council, and California Coastal Commission, and is in effect. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 2. Construction shall be limited to Monday— Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 3. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$43.00 for the posting of the Notice of ExDetermination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. 5. A Mitigation Monitoring Fee shall be paid to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 6. Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final inspection or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (PW) 7. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 8. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. (PW) 9. The development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and operation of all underground storage tanks. (FD) (02c10924 Parkside TTM CUP CDP) Attachment 1.26 ATTACHMENT #9) I ; TRACT NO. 10053 ` n....72 FE r' I I •.: rF?ACT NO. 5FJ2 'sr onNL�� II t — •.. .-./�1'�, 11 r ..R•/ t for B �'I rnrr rurumva rura _ +• :it(....y�r il:��•',t r ..1._.t_ _ .�•' _. _ _~I,.I - w torn PA L•'PARK � — _ 1 ------------------ I .•....•�. %q // :./� AQ,j n~ a= a/- � -i- ':�r ter,>- ..-- _. - - __ •-� .. - �p ..tot o o ''I,� o,..= - :_ _�+ ,{.'- — - ":I .�-,. _ _.�T-;.,=.a-�-_ --e' __a_=__ ,or _ •_' /.:T h i.' ...eAr: ] a+.. r1,�I( j •I at' ,\ r. Y�� 1.�. _.., :�.. ='�--�o -`f a�., SRN`. it PASSIVE .1• �,� v \\•c j �('.) ��.t 1( :(�) PARK,SITE :.�r% $ \t .Ft :�' ' tot o vw.r ' for r 1 for v li .. ' � . h`� "l F1� •( �:�^) ,I i:fi^) E(-) r 1, 'F ��� N`.i;l `I'� =(`) 'a-) '',iil, r(:j :.(`1 � a-') a.� .!,�\• � , :1,.� �;q' �I ;` 'y•.. P4' tor. .r `, •�`� „ !' 1 .. /,' ...Q „�.��,rp,,.,r *��. „(y) :��. `.(::� ip:) ��.1 '.(:) :d`l ,t\, ,Ixl• ', "et Er' 'I, b "I CITY OF HUNTINCTON OEACH � COUNTY OF ORANGE I I I r\ •/,� , �\,� �/ •tot"�"• .r.' >. . '',. '�• Y5 /• I III " ,f'7�'.. ".,e� �a) _ r� f I III i 1 .1' 'I n ^ e.• „' 'y y• LAND USE SUMMARY �)fi I�.i L�rP� `� .�� •• \ICJ ~7;.•r•• v t„ul /•."" II �.�........, t 7 1�I i •.:a:",;..,. "y. 1 r "e,. '�•\' ! NOTES ....._.,,•........•. 1`l , II I ._ _ 1 ` '+ -4";e{ ��'�' "• LEGAL DESCRIPTION oMu[n,o,an 'I tl. ', '�' \,' ',.I' ✓'` .,� l 'n.a. :u o ann..aroo:`d'o.«ir�o�.«n •Y• i - - STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP '... J.... •I �1.I' f LOt.P «.,1.1A'11r1l.:.*X4 111.""- 1. ,;• •. .X;' .. \' j" •�t'L !';: VICINITY MAP' • ..(.. ., 7. � I^. Ao.wwta,rAol I .-...,..�..�. •..1:.� `� J ut - ;...; t :,. \ \ - J `� .•/" +J,1. .•�P tot..ton )S'.. '!17 ._`'\ N.�� ,r,t //, :i west—tl_� fi• .�-i .• ^�,+ ri ,.,* -_\ y v � �1;:•' , . PREPARED FOR: PItVAIttD BY. i' 11't ! �' ;•�,., ,.. SheaHomes ��� Lore .l , . ......,. �...,.. -• LOT.P •,r -- 7• .. •I• � ; .• .` �� 1,):" i �"" TENTATIVE TRACT �• .t, MAP NC"-� ,377 DETA9,OF LOT 0 DETAIL OF N` 'LINE DETAIL OF LEFT STATION NON ANNEXATION-ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT WITH 9 LOT AL'. E TT 15419 IT7l LOTS) I 7FfAC7 NO. 'IO i53 /' e....... b—'a TRACT NO. 57D2 's[ «E V ---___'..----------"-_--- Lot e, 1, tom-- - —_ _ LOT!, E PASEO(..:PARK •.1 f.`�. ITu_- - .. I • LOT.A-r.+ I LOTrrOi .A.� h�}� 'I „• !� -a' -y �1. fl -.q+-. :E N . ,1 _ nvr �1 I '+J \E� ;'/. .a _ .., a - I r y� it � ••�. .1�•'��. "�M��h u,. PASS/VF. .,"'7• - �, ��• .II� .; 1 -I.� `' r. _e1. T• C', PARK S/%•E „~Y' 4 'I:', �. � "� 'Tit, �tl f ttl ,I. 1_ ,}}, '-t.�• 'SEt ,klE ilf i �' �J` •�'tl• ttl �i} _� LOT D Lot C �! I'� rorn.0 rVnrrr - .. `'uI� •! �%. OT 5: �. L r r Ln�i�: ' 'l T- 'r M; � I — .' ��� 31. LOT A i IEr •�., . Mph t° 1 . ' � •• ,r.r•„rrnr,n, __ I�_I �': ; EL+ �l"'I F• IEIL. �„ �.l• T•, \ - 'ore', � Jf•1 '� �_,.� �I Of IIUN71NGION DE ACII G w. "•,, ,"' Ko. L „ E, '' �✓ J Y.� t ,�o�f ''t COUNTY OF ORANGE „y " ,,w` t \ \ M ' ✓f I I '� ,;.\, '• .f .-'+ '`.. �i,•,{{�„\ 3;!q• � 1^', � \ , ogi��V.• �,.9'ryI' !1 'Crt ,\�.v I ,�� .J ''�''{A r• y:GS d'� .1 \ L� �' ',L'�t`, � .c '� ,a-`�" \• t� �"� mot` so \..\ I,. ,� i I •��\ .f -� o .ice a.•,n \ /'LOS,r "� `` . ,:, E - .�:" 1~ r •�+ '� ' t '`.r0 '�' LAND USE SUMMARY I ' Ali?7•...1„T:,,11�.1 LQ7P �TII :i� s:E :�I'',�`, .:r. J: '�` � r�•,�n . . .:....,�.:..:..::...... E ,..________ _ __ �.,f �• '\+ °�f ?. � .�' ,:y.v"I ,\`v'ae LEGAL DESCRIPTION ':��� I {,• •.•, ^.p.' - ry\ �''•',F-�f. d t'r' i �' r`'' "` �o�`�' � xa a rwm s.t a caMTP ro nr„n.vun.x tnrr.i�rfT,�u ''%/ �,.•.''o, �{' :; '\ 'a"' ,a.W'x n..�'io.. b:�.,.4^,.,.,er ,' ?: �,`�T r r5 '\ L f.'` ;a •� .�,"I'' � I,�,. ,a d,K�Mr�r 1 •/' j XIS`j•',, y`��s�^•>t ,,;,�,.,• .( ;�� ,� �. �'.��'''� ,�• ,'�' 1(` H,' " / /l •O '�, �' � �(� \''•• STATEMENT OF=jHIP'LOT P --. Epn�'., Y'[.?\ ^.. ^,N'aE'rwyl���' -\, '\� � .,,. ,SE' i o f' ...1• (((fff///,,``��� ..o.uaJ a.,..a..l ulo,,.n..c..,., VICIWrY MAP 0 PASSIVE: � 'I� '* (�, �I,,`.j.�'� � •�..� .. t v, ,ii y� h. •P •r C . OPEN SPACE Tm \� Y'.Gy ._`_ _ J _ � a e \��' _ •�( , e,n i .ol.,on .mum,on. �� �''`�•((rr .`'r• f 'riff E'. - • .ice �I '.�y�•'' •ry'• DETAIL OF LOT O PM[YANEU FOIL PRFPMED EY. SheaHomes S �. O` N` TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS t\%Cl �';A'• DIY" . CT NOTES For- SITE y P �( c t •:J.J� I I fqa T r• u: u^ d t I� I•1 i�• - , LAN • Mfw'I lOfJl EMT` IIITr'fTRI NON ANNExATIONr-ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT TRACT 15377 WITH"` .,, am TI AwAp ^fd'nl ...a..ni •... . i.u,r...•a,. m.ew a I,xrrr 9 LOT ALTERNATIVE SITE PLAN 15419 (171 ITIt LOTS) ATTACHMENT # 10 NOTES ' .. I � [MSnxD LAND OSC A<ANr. ....•.•. : � . , I I , '. PA�CR Yp�:tliv V NUx IWc,Orr tlB[A[N vn�h SKRY. IION ...•_ O• t 1 CAS Y K[µwBtxµN—...A NG SSIaCP.LNT. R! LLLCIMC SERNCE:Sw MERN CAIbORNA tW——P— I I I 1 9L 1[IC 1 SIRWa-Yt NEiR4 L[PNON[4—K C.WIDrWIA. r0. CA. 1CLvl afrMtl: fWciDN BUM CV$.D as IRICT an0 1 lacla&ACx WrNW Nlar$_.__... I II _ . L .-TN atr ST0 IP AiCPLEIA.R Mwr .IM.1 THE."..ACRNNE.. MMS IS .-C...Ta A OL[LOT A.P 1. -- 11B4 onw$1[D, r NOT,.A FAFtr . C-11RM _4.P1 �B.R.a LUNt. i LAND USE SUMMARY ( I LOT ND, USE 1 I ns .' IRImT rW.L N1» rrO 'rS w '•,•,' "' LOT A ' . �' < rAf •1IRuT _ SXIS7.40CALrPIVS MRS „ -I_ - • i LEGAL DESCRIPTION Rt/TR N ARpfOIIA(MTI MIMTO r rt 1r• • 7• '• R S BI AIOrM,tier, rt0:S[P.I.IBIB EOT •�' 'St16E / PORTIONS Or PARCELS B. 7,B A B AS CONAWD TO THE 'IR[[mr:RrrRW ARSE y y �,r r( rr I I E,fr• Os METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT Or SOVTNERN CALICCRNtA BY Of P' A •• CORPORATION DUI P OECD RECORDED E R 11, 1974 IN BOOK HOBO,PAGE ACE 287 OC OEE,CNL RECORDS OE .. ' 0. ORANCE COUNTY. /" N,,,, i ` a'-✓.6' VICINITY MAP r�' "/ `�.%/ ilI .I �• "� SCALE t•WAT R •/ r�`r_••/ ��.�. 1 Os PY Imo, y00. / DAIS snrN N. w,a a.Tun F /, '`Y`1 �_ fa"AG Y• L • t� '�M t�fC . CROSS AREA _ SEE NOTES •� �•A " LOT CONTOUR WERVAI TOTAL LOTS NUM E.A C. r n•r (JJ KI a HUMMED 1rs' ' a �j - — ,«TIMED /• 6� raa SSI /' .'.Pr• � PAVE cc�� '' 'f OPEN SPACE 9�� ..... 11; : (RA.Ra<RCT I1 ",yil /).. (i'n , n:. nA•o anrr NON. .III 4 S •-{' a I IIIL.�IIII ...... .. •(rIA•ARrr•Pu,LI). .. NC�Nt - Cf. .�F. u___ •Ma A; u.rovT AD t OVi[O.lE.� ... .i':i'� cN�.e7N6� 9 OATS. ..................... ' vfwr�° D w eo tm' :,j I GZ ti�j lerap a • .':. vx . ......... F�0 tOF, STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP GI`G/•) CER E(BY STATE THAT THIS SUPERS'If10N AND IHAT H WAS P E UWNLItOr1[CORI MY ALAS v- [NOWIR)CE of ANO CONSINIS 70 THE MING oT THIS MAP.OR% ---- - DATE .*.,.,...-........,..........-.......-...........-- - / PREPARm 1OR: I'RU'AKLI)IIY: y STREET SECTION SheaHomes ,I�w. , _«..... ^ I,I T a la,•' ALTERNATIVE (9 LOT) v 4 TENTATIVE TRACT � MAD Ai(IDf'NHrICN aA,.••++S'rNLI� ':P.N..1 NN, Br Dr =; MAP . NO. 15419 'EOCA7TONr11AP ' srANOwD vuNSlo.Roanro �� WITH 9 LOT ALTERNATIVE ,�% '5419 .I (171 LOTS) , sNn I or E N Lv�N\I,BI,.1 r , ------ ---- ----------------- -- — I , I o' _ _ LOT-P _.. /�Jror.�1 ��1F1!' I I.R. � •i•=' 1 I ii- LOT A 9Y Al—lrllY,OI I[tr YP.1. 'IME aSCRPff01/, MrQEAMIRw PoI u' 1 '�nl 9 _ \ . /• ' y�*~ 4f/ ,,.�,ri.::'.•/ ,,.,, j� ��>' c a�+ r ti,: dam'+ ` Ate,:• a d alra°�'t m'T` (d Lor e r AV 1,k'. a •'�r?Pa"��j5s s `j VJr ,��:`���r�r.',.' _f,•�1 a Ac) .a\e' p�9�D VICINITY MAP j!_ ,•J ;\� p to WE aIN lNR�) ,,., •�\\' '1�' yS /' ---' SCALE1'•hfY - ::/:' ..Tri.r.` Y2.Lf' A,✓- , /• C/� DATE .k PASSIVE °•�+j°' C W.O. - :': SPACE CROSS AREA ____ Sit NOIE5 OPEN A tif�.9G • Ill .• y CONTOUR INTERVAL/f_ •1• I�I ' SIN 0'`O��'Y�]r TOTAL LOTS__ .._Y N NSTIREU f S LEIIEI(EU ' I I y � CAC:y" 'i R�� tS�`,L"exLrA CNPN\sC` 14 - --- ----- �l L NOTES r Cp� [,FO�' LAND u5[:v cANI, 0 S0 e0 17a I —IA.. _ f`pp0 / C P�E� eaXA all iA vrcorlcAAly�Nura�N DfN91Y REvalnAL(PNInON) UAII uNfgN �c n p6t STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP (lPN IL I'll C v"I�HCE.u -E c u`r a c faxNlA ,'y/ 0/ 1 vON u`" v_ My%UP 5fA1[IIIAI If IS I Till WAS YN,IAR,k C0kU D `UOL dSiti`I drf IM 410r,L 0C tr1 aR 5[tl00.pSrratl AND MY SUYIINt Ot U ONI 1111 OWNIR DI,I,OYU 115 •• •, •, •• •, 1RIVan NDfON uN[M NitN OOL defliC, e —.... UkS I%2 Ul MU CON]lNIS IO INI i1lIN4 Of INK fAN. ,} NULnRE uAai uAY tlE aLED fVNLfANI ID Y<Tdf eaA]e f I MS CALM U A OOVEIN A T LODE. isiws Is AN SIS PIAndf ral1 DIVCLO 1 rclu,f -- DATE._. DAruu RA vs Is NAw ee,w1s a]AD.Ars¢D.Rr l -.-f , ff arr cRossoiscA-f.1e Ac.-aR Mr ANCA-ff al Ac. PREPARED BY: fi -- - I PREPARED FOR: x —1 ,, r _ — LAND USE SUMMARY 'bA eaH_OmeS ' •/ -- TOT Na USE �° wa (1011 NDALosam w) ,� ~iAw"'i.M.mu*i�'i'faf 1Asac— A.I—)1 NOA — _- _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALTERNATIVE (9 LOT) METROPOLITAN OC PARCELS Q, I Q B 9 AS ERNYLTCO TO iNC SITE PLAN NEIROPOEIIAN WATER OISIRlCI a SOUTHERN GIIfORNN BY a� - N D IC nll�C,E,q CORPORATION O(RTCfA/N OCCO RCCOROCO CCQRENRY 11, C914 n, O BOAC OUNrY PACE 187 0!OFFICIAL RECORDS OC MAP® N O. 15/y 19 • ORANCC COUNTY. �'E Y- ®A °O'R' WITH 9 LOT ALTERNATIVE TT 15419 I (171 LOTS) p ATTACHMENT # 11 0 Q La0 jIL MASTER BATH n I DWfiR 'MF ILYMASTE BEDROOMa rs4n• III AI IUII All - j/„ LIVNG ROOM ��� �RVI � r•,.r T,• BEDROOM ► ► `^` I ►III/ BEDROOM BEDROOM „•n„c � nr. 0 rr•nn � I � II II II OPT. GARAGE j� BEDROOM u PLAN 1 THE ESTATES 3000 sT - — —by SHEA HOMES ARCNITKTS • ne-orn •++.uu.�o .-u-+r 1-7 •"'r�, � r I I try, BEDROOM) BEDROOM 2 MAS ER BEDRM~ FAMILY ROOM , WA t•• r�' ��' MAY IN IIHIIBA 3 MIII ( p F LIVWG ROOM r u 8A 2 0 P' NIII►AIUI14 ` BEDROOM 4'r �,,,. i FLEX SPACE (°`� •a ERV ✓,i �—•rye •u GARAGE PLAN 2 --)200 SF THE ESTATES : - - ---- --_ by I I SHEA HOMES ARGNREGTS Solo. e BEDROOM uEDROOM " Q t.n D G R M FAMILY ROOM ff rf�, � nxn MASTER BE ROO BEDROOM B OPT. LIVM ROOM SUPFAMILY y. ! MASTER BS BATH ,i•� _ BEDROOM RVIC TR WORKSHOP 41 II BEDROOM GARAGE BEDDROOM PLAN 3 THE ESTATES J/OOSF by SHEA HOMES al ARCHITECTS (�1 � ", �.t.a�.•r err .��, � � .`, �.. ,!. !k ✓: �. Kal"K FRONT ELEVATION, r nrr„rV PLAN 1 - - -- -- -- - - - -- - - - - - T--H-E----E S TAT E S - - - - - by SHEA HOMES - - ARCHITEQS u+eurw,or. ...uma.,rm ue•e,oe -n-e, .W"' '��at.�Y•. ti 'raj r FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 2 THE ESTATES - - by SHEA HOMES -- - - ,. - — l•--.—. Aeci urEas •I; 44 d Wlt 6 f m1gi, FRONT t�evnnow�'=' .�.' `'• ''tr' -; . PLAN 3 t THE ESTATES - - : 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - SHEA HOMES - - - - - .w�uwnan y D1Nmc l aurkb0l .�f` eaE OPEN DEN BO Is 1 4 aeDgaoeLa j DEN OPTION CAR E—_ -- - -- -- � - - - --- - - - — Y Yid UPPER FLOOR I.UW f R FLOOR p L A N 1 I us us 4 BEDROOM • 3.5 BATH • 2,600 S.F. M.45F.NIM1 II�AVI ® PARKSIDE ■ -- -�' SHED HOMES HUNTINGTON BEACH "' HASTEN 'I MA51ER I — ✓!' r B RETREAL RE REAT _ ,, I xln� I RETREAT OPTION i GAGA ',3. BE rQ�eLS UPPER FLOOR r LOWER FLOOR ` P L A N 2 5 BEDROOM • 3.5 BATH • 2,750 SQ. FT. 9A.SSENIM! V<L:OIVI SHEA HOMES ® PARK .S I D E ® HUNTINGTON BEACH -� 1 �— A '( d� �-V_t -r Kfl'If•N N RIK• r1 VT I if A TER MASTER _— _ -- :WILeY IVI.G' OPENDi BEDROOAI S — MEDIA — Avn l<' ruugflRt �� ;ARA f 14 � BEDRO(ML2 it° l I 'AR A'k �J tlEQR�lLl 8l ` ' / • �_ .� BEDROOM 5 SUITE OPTION UPPER FLOOR LOWER FLOOR P I, A N 3 5 BEDROOM • 4 BATH • 2,900 S.F. • MEDIA/LIBRARY OPT. • n�ss�MnN LACCN1 ■ PARKSIDE ■ _-_ SHEAHOVIES HUNTINGTON BEACH -,.r `.•./. ' •fit•.. FRONT }ram) f �FC,"f I Il'.JI 1L11 LEFT REAR RIGHT �rnc�:i.�nr ♦once�me �s_vn i twr 7-03 02 P L A N 1 aks%N m SHEn HOMES ® P A R K S I D E ® y HUNTINGTON BEACH - -- ' .•a,, rid ,. tl lit ~ FRONT23 IY i SA% T M LEFT REAR RIGHT 1'IiLL'Y.L1NM iiNff:LINO /f NfY.i INF:� , 01•0] P L A N 2 &kSSF.NM LAGCNI' ■ PARKSIDE ■ __�� SHEn 9-I®IVIES HUNTINGTON BEACH — ~�— I.,.yl,l, ,l,_�.�'. � n� � I��„kr•'yip r ro` w FRONT LEFT REAR RIGHT YLAI'LL I IAY- II.NI'l:I INI:-� YlNCI:LINtl- 7 0 01 P L A N 3 atiss�r�w SHEn HOMES ® P A R K S I D E ® � HUNTINGTON BEACH ATTACHMENT # 12 i i Council/Agency Meeting Held: Deferred/Continued to: _ ❑Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved i City Clerk's Signature Council Meeting Date: October A2& - -'-apartment ID Number: PL02-41 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ti C REQUEST FOR ACTION a SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS o SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, City Administrator alb PREPARED BY: HOWARD ZELEFSKY, Director of Plannin - SUBJECT: APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 15377 (CITY)AND 15419 (COUNTY); CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. NO. 96-90; COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18 (PARKSIDE ESTATES APPEAL) Statement or Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachments) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Mayor Debbie Cook of the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377 and 15419, Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90, and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18. These applications represent a request by Shea Homes to develop a 171 single-family residential planned unit development (PUD) on 49.9 acres, dedicate and improve 8.2 acres for public park purposes, and for retaining walls up to 3.5' in height in lieu of a maximum of�2'. The request also includes dual product lot sizes with lots that are minimum 5,000 sq. ft. and 50' in width and minimum 6,000 sq. ft. and 60' in width. The Planning Commission conditionally approved the request and staff is recommending the City Council also approve the entitlements because the project is;.consistent with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and General Plan goals and policies, there are several public improvements to be constructed (i.e., traffic signal, storm drainage improvements, and flood control protection), approximately 7,000 housing units will be removed from the mandatory flood insurance zone, almost 30% of the project area will be open space (public and private), and the site has been zoned and general planned for low density residential since 1971. Funding Source: Not applicable. REQI#F. jR CTION MEETING DATE: October 21, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL0241 ilk Recommended Action: A. PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: 1) "Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 (City) and 15419 (County), Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90, and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 with findings and suggested conditions of approval (Attachment No. 1)," and 2) "Approve CEQA Statement of Findings of Fact (Attachment No. 2) and approve the Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment No. 3)." Planning Commission Action on September 24, 2002: THE MOTION MADE BY KERINS, SECONDED BY HARDY, TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 15377 AND 15419, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18 WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL,'APPROVE FINDINGS OF FACT AND A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND APPROVE THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: STANTON, KERINS, SHOMAKER, LIVENGOOD, KOKAL, PORTER NOES: HARDY ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE MOTION PASSED Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1) "Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 (City), Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90, and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 with Findings for Approval; and deny.Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 (County) with Findings for Denial (Non-Annexation Alternative)." 2) "Deny Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 and 15419, Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90, and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 with Findings for Denial." 3) "Continue Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 and 15419, Conditional Use Permit No. 96- 90, and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 and direct staff accordingly." PL02-41 -2- 10/10/2002 10:48 AM 3 REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: October 21, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-41 f Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Ron Metzler, Shea Homes, 603 S. Valencia Ave., Ste. 200, Brea, CA 92833 Location: 17301 Graham Street (Westside of Graham, south of Kenilworth, adjacent to the Wintersburg Flood Control Channel) Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 (City) represents a request to subdivide approximately 45 acres into 162 single family residential lots and several lettered lots for open space and landscaped areas (Attachment No. 5) pursuant to Chapters 250 to 258 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO). The map also includes dedication of an 8.2 acre public park consisting of 4.1±acres of bluff and down slopes, and a 4.1+ acre flat area at the base of the bluff. The lettered lots include 2.9+ acres of HOA common areas, paseo park, and passive areas. Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 (County) represents a to request subdivide approximately € 4.9 acres into nine single family residential.lots (1.6± acres) and lettered lots for open space areas (Attachment No. 6) pursuant to Chapters 250 to 258 of the HBZSO. Lettered lots include a 3.3+ acre HOA passive open space area containing the EPA delineated pocket wetland, the patchy pickle weed, potential jurisdictional wetlands, and a buffer to the residential uses. The proposed subdivision consists of lots ranging from 6,000 to 10,447 square feet in size for the 60-foot wide parcels; and 5,058 to 8,807 square feet in size for the 50' wide parcels (Attachment No. 20). The average lot size for the entire 171-lot project is 6,409 square feet. The density is 4.4 units per acre excluding the 8.2 acre public park dedication. Primary access to the proposed development will be provided from Graham Street. A second access for emergency access only is proposed to Greenleaf at the northwest comer of the residential portion of the site. All streets will be public and there will be no vehicular access gates. Parking on both sides of the street is available throughout the subdivision. Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 represents a request for the following: A. To develop 171 two-story, detached single family residential units with site plans, floor plans, and elevations pursuant to Chapter 210 of the HBZSO. The request also includes a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for dual-product lot sizes to include 94 lots with minimum 50' frontages and minimum 5,000 sq. ft. lot sizes (average 5,700 sq. ft.); and 77 lots with minimum 60' frontages and minimum 6,000 sq. ft. lot sizes (avg. >7,000 sq. ft.); and seven flag lots with a minimum frontage of 24'. Those lots that are less than the code requirement of 60' in width and 6,000 sq. ft in size may be permitted as part of a PUD pursuant to Section 210.06, Property Development Standards of the HBZSO. - PL02-41 -3- 10M0/200210:48 AM 1 REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: October 21, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-41 B. To improve an 8.2 acre park consisting of 4.1 acres of,passive area and 4.1 acres of active recreational area (Attachment No. 16). Project.includes $250,000 worth of park improvements by the applicant. C. To allow retaining walls greater than two ft. in height and up to 3.5 ft. in height along the westerly property line adjacent to property within the County of Orange and along the flood control channel pursuant to Chapter 230.88 of the HBZSO (Attachment No. 9). D. To permit development on a site with a grade differential of greater than three (3) feet from the low to the high point pursuant to Chapter 230.70 of the HBZSO. The site is relatively flat with some areas as low as 0.2' to about 10' adjacent to the flood control channel, and increasing to 48' on the bluff at the northwest corner of the site. Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 represents a request to develop 171 two-story, detached, single family residential units and associated infrastructure, and develop an 8.2 acre park pursuant to Chapter 221 of the HBZSO. The development consists of two housing products. The 60-wide lots include units consisting of four, five and six bedroom units ranging from 3,000 square feet to 3,400 square feet in size. The 50-wide lots include units that are four to five bedroom units ranging from 2,600 square feet to 2,900 square feet. Most units offer a three-car garage; there are some two-car garages. On-site grading of approximately 263,000 cubic yards of dirt will be imported to the site. The entire site will be graded and dewatered. Most of the residential portion of the site will be filled with dirt. The lot pads will range from 5.3' to 6.7' with some lots along the westerly edge of the residential portion of the site up to 11.9'. The residential portion of the site is being elevated to comply with FEMA requirements and a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). Shea Homes has an agreement with Huntington Beach Union High School and Oceanview school districts to pay approximately $1.00 more per sq. ft. than the State mandated $2.14 per sq. ft. of living space School Facilities fee. However, the actual fee amount will be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. It should be noted that it will continue to have inflationary adjustments. Associated requests for General Plan Amendment No. 98-1, Local Program Amendment No. 96-4, and Zoning Amendment Nos. 96-5A& 5B, and Annexation No. 98-1 are discussed in a separate report. These requests must first be approved by the City Council and California Coastal Commission before the tentative tract maps, conditional use permit and coastal development permit become effective. PL02-41 -4- 10/10/200210:48 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: October 21, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-41 The Parkside project includes numerous public improvements (Attachment No. 17) to storm drains, storm water pump facilities, flood channel improvements, water quality, sanitary ' sewers, public park, traffic signals and Graham Street striping. Many of these improvements will provide benefits to area beyond the proposed development (Attachment No. 18). Some of them include: • Drainage in the surrounding neighborhoods will be improved by reducing the amount of storm water being directed into the Graham Street storm drain. • Drainage improvements, when completed and certified by FEMA, will permit FEMA to upgrade the flood insurance map. The new flood insurance map will result in approximately 1430 acres consisting of 7,000 housing units being removed from the mandatory flood insurance zone. • Sheet piling will be installed along the developed portion of Parkside Estates at the northerly edge of the Wintersburg Flood Control Channel to increase channel capacity and provide flood protection for the area. ® Storm drain capacity in the Kenilworth Drive/Graham Street area will be improved with., the rerouting of the Cabo Del Mar and Graham Street storm drains through the Parkside Estates project directly to the pump station. • The Slater Storm Water Pump Station will be expanded by installing two new pumps to meet City Master Plan standards. • Storm Water Quality going into the Slater Channel will be improved. • The existing deficient sewer pump station in Graham Street will be replaced with a new and larger facility to meet current City Master Plan Standards. • A traffic signal will be installed at the project entrance on Graham Street, which will provide a safer crossing for school children. • Graham Street will be re-striped from Slater Avenue to Warner Avenue to incorporate left-turn lanes to improve traffic flow. • The City's park system will be enhanced by the dedication and improvement of the proposed 8.2-acre park site. City code requires dedication of 2.3 acres of public park; this plan provides 8.2 acres of park that is 5.9 acres above the code requirement. The proposed park includes preservation of an existing 4.1-acre eucalyptus grove and provides an active recreation area. The developer is also contributing $250,000 toward park improvements. PL02-41 -5- 10/10/2002 10:48 AM r REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: October 21, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL0241 • The cost to add these extensive "regional public benefits" to the proposed project exceeds $8,000,000. B. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: On September 10, 2002 and September 24, 2002, the Planning Commission held hearings to consider the Parkside Estates project and associated entitlements. There were several people who spoke for and against the project. Neighbors who spoke in opposition cited concerns about traffic, storm water flooding, subsidence, fault lines, flood control channel capacity, liquefaction, Slater Pump Station capacity, and Fire Department response times. The Planning Commission continued the project from the September 10, 2002 meeting and requested clarification regarding items pertaining to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Following the public hearing on September 24, 2002, the Planning Commission certified the EIR, and approved the subject entitlements. C. AP P EAL: On October 3, 2002, Mayor Debbie Cook appealed the Planning Commission's conditional approval of Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377 (City), and 15419 (County), Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18, as well as the certification of EIR No. 97-2. The appeal letter cites the adequacy of the EIR and related issues including wetlands designation, construction impacts, traffic, noise, soils testing, drainage/hydrology, subsidence, and fire and emergency medical response (Attachment No. 4). D. STAFF ANALYSIS: The original project submittal was for 208 single family residential units, which included lots abutting the northerly property line and vehicular access to Greenleaf. Several changes were made to the site plan over the last few years in response to comments on the draft EIR that was circulated, community meetings conducted by the applicant, and a change in FEMA requirements. The current plan is for 171 units, an 8.2 acre.public park, and 6.2 acres of common open space, which includes a coastal conservation area and paseo park. In addition, access to Greenleaf was restricted to emergency vehicles and the project entry was redesigned for more vehicle queuing on-site and shifted further north to maximize sight distance from the bridge. The project is consistent with the existing and proposed General Plan Land Use designations, as well as the goals and policies of the General Plan. In addition, the project is in compliance with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and the City's Local Coastal Program Implementing Ordinances. A complete discussion of General Plan Conformance and Zoning Compliance is on pages 7-12 of the Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 10, 2002 for the subject entitlements (Attachment No. 21). PL02-41 -6- 10/10/2002 10:48 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION k MEETING DATE: October 21, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-41 The following analysis of the proposed 171 single family residential project evaluates land use compatibility, project layout and design, grading and retaining walls, County parcel,and Coastal processing. Land Use Compatibility The proposed detached single family residential development will be compatible with surrounding uses consisting of single family residences to the north, east, and south. The proposed density is comparable with density of existing homes. The proposed residential units are compatible in both height and architectural massing to the adjacent single family residential projects and therefore will have no adverse impacts to surrounding developments regarding scale and massing. There is a 133 ft. separation between the existing homes and proposed homes including a 50 ft. wide landscaped area (paseo park) along the north property line. The open space areas are sited in a manner, which maximizes their effectiveness while at the same time protecting and creating buffers to cultural and biological resources. Project Layout/Design There is one access point to the proposed development, which is from Graham Street. It will be a signalized intersection. This entrance connects to a street that parallels the paseo park and continues through the project to the public park located toward the rear of the site. A meandering sidewalk along the north side of"B" street within the paseo park is recommended. Secondary access for emergency purposes only is shown at Greenleaf. In reference to building layout, there should be more varied front setbacks and varied garage placement and orientation on each lot. It is recommended that 25% of the 60 ft wide lots be designed with side entry garages and/or garages located toward the rear of the lot and that the direct entry garages have varying front setbacks of two feet to four feet between lots through the entire project. Some of the lots have side yards that abut the rear yard of an adjoining lot. In these cases, in order to minimize visual intrusion and noise impacts, it,is recommended that the interior side yard of such lots have a minimum of 10 foot building setback. With these suggested conditions and modifications, the site planning techniques recommended allow for a more attractive street scene, and minimize future impacts between lots. In compliance with the Citywide Design Guidelines, which encourage the integration of public art, it is recommended that a form of public art be provided on-site. The proposed art form shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board and Community Services Department. The Urban Design Element in the General Plan contains objectives and policies for the integration of public art in the design of public and private development. PL02-41 -7- 10/10/2002 10:48 Am REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: October 21, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-41 Grading/Retaining Walls The subject site is in the FP2 (Floodplain —2) Overlay District. It is subject to Chapter 222, FP of the HBZSO, which applies to all areas of special flood hazard within the City. There is discussion of the history of FEMA actions in EIR#97-2, pages 6-33 through 6-35. The current minimum base flood elevation is approximately 4.6'. This is based upon a CLOMR to the City dated June 6, 2002 as a result of an extensive watershed analysis completed by Exponent Consultants. The City further requires that minimum pad elevations be one foot above the minimum base flood elevation. A Lot Summary Table (Attachment No. 20) has been prepared by the applicant's engineer that depicts every lot, its current lowest grade, proposed pad elevation, and the grade difference. Some lots are being elevated to a pad height of 11±feet because they are located along the westerly edge of the residential portion of the site and subject to a high water line in the Bolsa Chica area. In order to reach this elevation, there are two to 3.5 feet seawalls (retaining walls), a 4:1 slope area, then another small retaining wall. This layer- cake effect creates an aesthetically pleasing transition between the proposed single family residential development and the Bolsa Chica area. Staff supports the proposed development with a grade differential and the increased height : of retaining walls based on compliance with FEMA and City requirements. There will be no grade differential along the north property line. There is a wall proposed along the north property line however, it is recommended that it not be installed as there is a lot of existing vegetation that does not need to be disrupted. The site begins to elevate further away from the north property line and has been designed to include a landscape buffer with intensified landscape to minimize adverse impacts to the property to the north. The grade differential at the southerly property line will not result in adverse impacts because it is lower than the existing flood control channel's earthen berm. County Parcel Lot C of Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 (County) contains an EPA delineated pocket wetland, patchy pickleweed, and potential jurisdictional wetlands. The original development plan depicted 27 lots on the County portion of the project. After the environmental analysis was conducted, the applicant submitted a revised layout for nine lots on 1.6 acres and open spacelconservation on 3.3 acres. This is consistent with the proposed General Plan and zoning designation for the property of Coastal Conservation. The area is proposed to remain open space and be owned by the Parkside Estates Homeowner's Association. An open spacelwetland preservation deed restriction will be required for the lot. A recent wetlands delineation prepared for the applicant for the County area concluded that there was potential wetland area overlapping the already documented patchy pickleweed. Coastal Zone Overlay zoning requires a minimum 100-foot buffer between development and PL02-41 -8- 101101200210:52 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: October 21, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-41 potential wetland. Therefore, .it is recommended that Lot No. 4 of the tract be deleted in . order to achieve a minimum 100-foot buffer.. Housing Goals The construction of 171 single family residential units will help meet the City's housing goals. In addition, an Affordable Housing Agreement Plan will be submitted by Shea Homes providing for affordable housing units off-site. There will be 18 affordable units (10% of the total 171 proposed units) for families of low-income level (less than 80% of Orange County median)for a period of thirty years. They will be either new units or rehabilitated units in Huntington Beach. This too will assist in achieving the City's housing goals. Coastal Processing A portion of the proposed project is within an "Area of Deferred Certification" in the Coastal Zone and can be appealed to the California Coastal Commission. Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 is being processed concurrently with two tentative tract maps, a conditional use permit, a local coastal program amendment, ageneral plan amendment, and a zoning map amendment. The proposed project complies with the Coastal Zone requirements and will implement the policies of the Coastal Element as described in the September 10, 2002 Planning Commission Staff Report. If the project is approved, the CDP will be conditioned that it does not become effective until Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 96-4 has been certified by the California Coastal Commission. E. SUMMARY Staff recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Tract Map No. 15337 (City), Tentative Tract Map No. 15419 (County), Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90, and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 as modified by the Planning Commission based upon the following: ■ The site has been zoned and general planned as low density residential for 31 years. ■ The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of RL-7 (Low Density Residential) and proposed designation of RL-7 on the subject property. • The project is consistent with the Local Coastal Program/Coastal Element as it does not impact public access or recreational opportunities in the Coastal Zone. s There are several public improvements to be constructed as a result of this project including a traffic signal, storm drainage improvements and flood control protection to ensure that the development is adequately served with infrastructure. PL02-41 -9- 10/10/2002 10:48 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: October 21, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-41 • Grading, including the import of fill on the property, is consistent with FEMA requirements. • Drainage improvements, when completed and certified by FEMA, will permit FEMA to upgrade the flood insurance map. The new flood insurance map will result in approximately 1430 acres consisting of 7,000 housing units being removed from the mandatory flood insurance zone. ■ Sheet piling will be installed along the developed portion of Parkside Estates at the northerly edge of the Wintersburg Flood Control Channel to increase channel capacity and provide flood protection for the area. • 28% of the project area (14.4 acres)will be in open space: an 8.2 acre dedicated public park (5.9 acres dedicated above the code requirement) and 6.2 acres of common open space throughout the project. ■ The project along with the 10% affordable housing requirement helps the City meet it's housing goals. ■ Project is well-designed in terms of street layout and architecture. • The project is designed to be compatible with adjacent low density residential uses in terms of density and building layout, and open space uses. Environmental Status: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) No. 97-2 was prepared by EDAW Inc., a consultant hired by the City to analyze the potential impacts to the project. Because the EIR has been appealed, the DEIR must be certified by the City Council prior to any action on General Plan Amendment No. 98- 1, Zoning Map Amendment.No. 96-5A and 5B, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 96-4, Annexation No. 98-1, Tentative Tract Map No. 15377 and 15419, Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18. The DEIR is intended to serve as an informational document for decisions to be made by the City and responsible agencies regarding the proposed project. The DEIR covers both the proposed land use designation amendments, as well as the proposed development of the site (annexation, general plan amendment, zoning map amendment, tentative tract map, conditional use permit, etc.). DEIR No. 97-2 discusses potential adverse impacts in the areas of land use compatibility, aesthetics/light glare, transportation/circulation, air quality, noise, earth resources, drainage/hydrology, biological resources, cultural resources and public services and utilities. The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the proposal are discussed, as are the impacts of project alternatives. PL02-41 -10- 10/10/2002 10:48 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: October 21, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-41 Following approval of the tentative tract maps, conditional use permit, and coastal development permit, the City Council must approve CEQA Statement of Findings and Fact (Attachment No. 2), and a Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment No. 3). Attachments: eI ion J� er- 8 U� 26 2 �06� I I g y ,2002 1 �0 0,22602 I ��- I�►� 13i , 2992 1�8 140 - an 10 I�'3 j yS49 Uhtan Desigm Guidelimes Gheeklist le I g ve �cae RCA Author: Scott Hess, Principal Planner/Howard Zelefsky, Director of Planning PL02-41 -11- 10/10/2002 10:48 AM ATTACHMENT # 13 &ASSOCIATES I R V I N E, I N C. November 17, 2008 PLANNING ENGINEERING " SURVEYING GOVERNMENT RELATIONS Mr. Scott Hess 16 Planning Director ��� IRViNE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH LOS ANGELES Planning Department RIVERSIDE 2000 Main Street SAN DIEGO Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Submittal of Revised Tentative Tract Maps 15377 and 15419, CDP 96-18, GPA 98-1, CUP 96-90, ZMA 06-05 Gentlemen: On behalf of our client, Shea Homes, we are proposing the revisions to Tentative Tract Maps 15377 and 15419 and the accompanying discretionary permits. This FOUNDING PARTNERS: revision is to make the development conform to the City and Coastal Commission RICHARD HUNSAKER approved Land Use Plan (LUP) and the City's General Plan which reflects these TOM R.McGANNON changes. JOHN A.MICHLER DOUGLAS G.SNYDER The following is in response to the City's filing requirements: 1. Existing use on the property is vacant and ongoing agriculture crop growing on approximately 36 of the total 50± acres. • The LUP zoning is 26,.728 acre RL low density residential and 23.112 acre of OC-C open space residential. PRINCIPALS: 2. Proposed use of property within RL area: TTON DAVID FRAE FID TTONE ® III Single family residential lots with a minimum 5,500 SF which BRADLEY HAY average 6,200 SF. 4 house plans are proposed that vary from 3,109 SF to 3,704 SF. PAUL HUDDLESTON KAMAL H.KARAM 1.48 acre Paseo Park area along the northerly boundary adjacent to DOUGLAS L.STALEY the existing residential (within the RL low density residential area). KRIS WEBER )OSEPH E.WIGHTMAN . 1 acre public Active Park area. • 0.64 acre of open space lots adjacent to the restored wetlands area and natural treatment system. Open Space Conservation area uses proposed as follows.- Creation of 4+ Acre "EPA"wetlands area with additional buffer area. • Restoration of previously destroyed wetlands area of 0.39 acre, within Three Hughes the 4.8 acre CP open space/wetlands area to be preserved (TTM Irvine,California 15419). 92618-2021 (949)583-1010 PH • Construction of a Natural Treatment System Water Quality basin. (949)583-0759 FX www.hunsaker.com Mr. Scott Hess Planning Director CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH November 17, 2008 Page 2 • Construction of a vegetated flood protection barrier perpendicular to Wintersburg Channel tying into Bluff. • A trail system and view area for public use. ® 0.57 acre public Passive Park. • Protect in place 2 Eucalyptus groves with buffers. • Preserve "AP" wetland area adjacent to westerly bluff. 3. Public improvements proposed for the development as follows: • Construct vegetated flood barrier perpendicular to the Wintersburg Channel at the west edge of Tract 15377. This will provide storm flood protection for this site and adjacent low lying areas. • Construct regional storm drain through the site. • Construct additional pumps in Slater Pump station, thus upgrading the pumping capacity. • New sewer lift station at Graham Street to accommodate this project and adjacent properties. • Construct new force main to Warner Avenue. • Construction of a Natural Treatment System BMP to meet water quality requirements. • Complete access road and trail along development frontage of Wintersburg Channel 4. Public Areas: • Project will construct a regional trail system along the development frontage of Wintersburg Channel for biking and hiking. • A public viewing area will be constructed in conjunction with the access road/trail on the flood barrier that ties into the bluff. • There will be a trail system within Parkside that will provide access to the passive and active park, and the Wintersburg Channel trail, as well as viewing of the EPA wetland area. • Create a 1 acre public active park area. • Create a 0.57 acre public passive park. 5. Tree planting proposed: ® See landscape plan for proposed plant palette. Mr. Scott Hess Planning Director o CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH November 17, 2008 Page 3 6. Restrictive covenants proposed: The Parkside Estates community property will be subject to recorded Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. (CC&R's). These CC&R's will define how the different areas of the community can be used by the property owners. A Homeowners Association (HOA) will be established to provide the enforcement of these CC&R's. The HOA will also be responsible to manage the facilities owned by the HOA. The HOA will also be responsible to provide oversight to owner installed improvements. Thank you for consideration of this proposed development. Please call if you have any questions. ®Richa SO T R IN , I C. r- Jr. Assistant Vice President Project Management ARF:tI xc: Ron Metzler W.O. 0061-15377 (f\c\wo\0061\1 5377 L02-arf.doc) ATTACHMENT # 14 04/18/2009 18:19 + DANNY MARLIKI PAGE 01/02 APRIL 17,2009 RD ECG EW E D TO;SCOTT HESS AICP SECRETARY SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE FAX;714 374 1540 APR 2 0 2009 FROM;CHERIE SUNSERI (5176 TORTUGA DRIVE#110,H.B.) Huntington Beach FAX;714 M6 0460 PLANNING DEPT. RE.REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS.15377 AND 15419 'WE HAVE LIVED HERE EIGHTEEN YEARS AND EVERY WINTER WHEN WE RECEIVE AVERAGE RAINFALL THE AREA FROM JUST OVER WALL BEHIND US ALL THE WAY TOWARD WINTERSBURG CHANNEL AND AS FAR AS WE CAN SEE TOWARDS GRAHAM STREET IS A LAKE.AND REAMINS A LAKE FOR ABOUT 23 MONTHS,WEATHER PERMITTING.11 WE SEE SANDPIPERS STRIDING ABOUT. UP TO THEIR BOTTOM FEATHERS,SO THE DEPTH IS SUCH TO ALLOW FOR MANY FOUL TO SWIM ABOUT,WHICH THEY DO.I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE VARIOUS BIRDS THAT V1SiT/LIVE THERE DURING THAT PERIOD,BUT THE NUMBERS ARE QUITE LARGE.CANADA GEESE ARE OUT THERE EVERY WINTER WHETHER THERE IS A LAKE OR NOT,SPENDING THEIR TIME GRAZING ON THE FOLAIGE AND SUNNING THEMSELVES. THE WHOLE AREA IS QUITE FULL OF BIRDS,SQUIRRELS,RABBiTS AND A NOT TOO SHY GROUP OF COYOTES.BUT THE LAKE/POND DOES ATTRACT MANY FOUL TO THE AREA.SINCE IT STARTED TO BE FARMED THE FARMERS LEARNED TO LEAVE IT ALONE THOSE MONTHS WHEN IT WOULD BE QUITE WET,AS A NUMBER OF TIMES THEY DECIDED TO PLOW UNDER THE SOIL AND THE TRACTOR GOT STUCK UP TO IT'S HUB IN THE MUD,AND WAS LEFT UNTIL THE SOIL DRIED UP A BIT. i CANNOT SEE ANYONE BUILDING ON LAND T►AT'S IS A LAKE FOR 2-3 MONTHS OUT OF THE YEAR, ON AVERAGE.LET ALONE DIS-PLACING WHATEVER WILDLIFE MAKE THIS AREA ITS HOME OR STOP- OVER POINT.i WOULD NOT RECOMMEND ANYONE PURCHASING A HOME ON THAT LAND WITH THE WATER TABLE 50 HIGH TO SURFACE. CHECK OUT THE ADDRESS LISTED ABOVE TO GET AN IDEA OF AREA OF WHICH I SPEAK.THE LAKE CONTINUES ON AROUND IN OPPOSITE DIRECT OF GRAHAM ST AROUND AND OUT OF OUR SITE BEHIND THE EUCALYPTUS GROVE,ALSO. THANK YOU FOR ADVANCE NOTICE OF THIS.PAST NOTICES HAVE ALWAYS BEEN RECEIVED EITHER THE DAY OF ACTION OR AFTER THE FACT.NOT GIVING ANYONE A CHANCE TO RESPOND.ALSO PRIOR MAPS AND INFO ENCLOSED WERE SO POORLY COPIED AND ILLEGASLE, I DO HOPE OTHER USES FOR THE LAND CAN BE FOUND THAN FOR RESIDENTIAL.IT SEEMS SUCH A SHAME TO DESTROY THE AREA,SO LITTLE IS LEFT OF PLACES LIKE THE WETLANDS AND SURROUNDING FOUAGE/WILDLIFE AREAS.WE HEARD THAT THE OWNERS OF LAND STARTING FARMING ON THE LAND TO SIDETRACK AROUND THE WETLAND tSSUE....... THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME IN THIS MATTER AND FOR READING THIS FAX. GOOD LUCK IN YOUR DECISION. Talleh, Rama From: Gary Trudeau [gmtrudeau@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 10:13 AM Jo: Talleh, Rami 'Subject: Foot Traffic near Cabo Del Mar Hello Rami, Thanks for taking the time to speak with me today. I'll contact you later this week to see what- might be a convenient time for me to stop by and look at the plans for active & passi-�re park walkways. As I had mentioned in our conversation, the existence of an informal path so close (25 feet) to the Cabo Del Mar homes has lowered the quality of life for residents due to the noise from people on the path talking: to each other, to their cell phones, shouting orders to their dogs, or groups of youths whose conversations tend to have increased volume. This activity can happen at any time during the day or night, and does. People whistling or shouting to recall an unleashed dog after 11 PM is not an uncommon occurrence. The police have been summoned numerous times by Cabo Del Mar residents because of the excess noise. Of additional concern is the hundreds of dog feces so close to Cabo Del Mar windows, which may represents a public health issue. An active park will be a benefit to local residents. It will no doubt present some annoyances, but on the whole should represent a positive addition to the community if the city can engineer a plan that does not direct public activities needlessly close to the bedroom windows of existing homeowners. Thanks again for your time and assistance. Regards, Vary Trudeau ,096 Tortuga Drive #106 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Tel : 714 840 3469 Cell : ?14 614 2431 giiiLEudeLiu@yahoo.com 1 To: Hess, Scott Cc: Monica Ruzich Hamilton <mdruzich@earthli nk.net> Sent: Fri Apr 17 13:15:01 2009 Subject: Parkside Residential Development Scott Hess,AICP Secretary, Subdivision Committee Re: Parkside Residential Development Dear Scott, I attended many of the public hearings concerning Parkside Estates. I witnessed that a major factor in past approvals of this development was the 8-acre active park which was to be established within the development boundary for public use. This park land was repeatedly stated by the Planning Dept. as being needed in this particular area of Huntington Beach. In fact, this 8-acre park was specifically made a condition of approval and included in the CUP/CDP. Further, the 8-acre active park was to be totally free of easements and/or restrictions. Now, I see that the 8-acre active park without easements and restrictions has been replaced on the proposed Tract Map 15377 by a much, much smaller"active park"of"approximately 1.0 acre." This proposed"park", Lot A, is oddly shaped by its boundary to render very little of it very useful as public park. Also, Lot A appears to be encumbered by existing easements and an emergency access right-of-way. What gives, Scott? Why are the prior conditions(CUP/CDP)being ignored? How did the need for an 8-acre park in the area suddenly disappear? How does an"approximately 1.0-acre public active park"satisfy the established, documented requirement. Do residents in my area have to settle now on the developer paying park"in-lieu fees"to be spent elsewhere, if at all? If this tract map is approved,who is to be accountable for the inexplicable change of requirements? Will these concerns be addressed during the April 21 Subdivision Committee meeting? Regards, -Dave Hamilton 5401 Kenilworth Dr. Huntington Beach Ph:(714)840-8901 cc:/ Monica Ruzich-Hamilton Page 1 of 1 Talleh, Rami From: Eftekhari, Aram [Aram.Eftekhari@ocpw.ocgov.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 9:33 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Subdivision Committee -April 21, 2009 Hi Rami, Thanks for your call. The following are Orange County Flood Control District's (OCFCD)comments regarding the Parkside Residential Development project(Revised Tentative Tract Map No.s 15377 and 15419): 1. It is our understanding that the City of Huntington Beach has agreed to condition Shea Homes, the project developer, to construct the ultimate, 100-year channel improvements/levee for the portion of the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel adjacent to the proposed development, with the appropriate tie-ins to high ground, in order to protect the proposed development from the 100-year flood level in the channel. Following formal conditioning by the City, an agreement with OCFCD needs to be entered into for the developer to pay for completion of the construction and to specify the details of the project. 2. The City of Huntington Beach as the Floodplain Administrator for areas within its boundaries should ensure that all FEMA floodplain regulations and requirements applicable to this project are met. If there any questions regarding these comments or additional information needed, please contact me at(714) 834-3754. Aram Eftekhari, P.E. Chief, Hydrology OC Public Works 714-834-3754 5/14/2009 Kevin Kelter&Leander Kelter 17122 Pleasant Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92649 (714)401-9710 Email: marylid@aol.com SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Mr.Rami Talleh Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 April 23,2009 Re: Tract Map NOS.15377 and 15419 Traffic Congestion Mitigation Dear Rami, I appreciate the time you spent with me after the Tuesday meeting to discuss the stacking problem with traffic on Graham Street. Traffic congestion occurs during the busy morning and evening hours when the cars traveling north on Graham Street start backing up from Warner Avenue(see enclosed diagram)to the south. The result is that entry into the original Prestige Tract(where Leander Kelter resides),on Pendleton Street, is blocked and virtually impossible to exit onto Graham Street during the rush hours. We would like to see signage and pavement striping depicting"Do Not Block Intersection'or other traffic controlling measures implemented to allow residents normal access onto Graham Street. I also foresee future signalization at this intersection that will open Pendleton to normal traffic flow. These same measures should also be instituted at Kenilworth Drive immediately to the south.The city needs to consider synchronization of signals on Graham Street starting at Warner. The city has previously signals on Heil Avenue at both Plaza Drive and Graham Street to improve traffic flow from the Summer Lane Tract. It is imperative that Graham Street traffic flow properly because many drivers cut through the Prestige Tract and enter Warner Avenue from Greentree Lane. It should be noted that Greentree Lane has a severe downhill slope and with the increased traffic it will experience,this could lead to traffic related incidents. In addition,at certain times during the winter, intense and vision obscuring fog occurs in this area.Without proper delineations and signalization,the current traffic issues referenced above could also lead to very serious traffic accidents. The mutual goal here should be to improve safety conditions for pedestrians and commuters and safely improve traffic flow. I appreciate your time for addressing my concerns. Best Regards, 0�7A11-- Kevin Kelter Enclosure ti PLO -- h lei Vech otl kew , q �'v �lJ��r�� o►� c2 ac 3 Talleh, Rami From: kcallahan001 @socal.rr.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:11 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Kathleen Woodard Callahan Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5501 kcallahan001 @socal.rr.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner i Talleh, Rami From: kbellon@verizon.net Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 9:58 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Kathy Bellon Huntington Beach, CA 92647 kbellon@verizon.net 7148426388 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner z Talleh, Rami From: pbellon@verizon.net Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 9:57 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Philip Bellon Huntington Beach, CA 92647 pbellon@verizon.net 7148426388 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 3 Talleh, Rami From: georgechristides@hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 6:40 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. George Christides Huntington Beach, CA 92647 georgechristides@hotmail.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 4 Talleh, Rami From: nik.other2@verizon.net Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 12:09 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. nik von gundell huntington beach, ca 92647 nik.other2@verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 5 Talleh, Rami From: jwdf@msn.com Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 7:33 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Jim Whitworth Huntington Beach , Ca 92647 jwdf@msn.com 714-975-0488 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 6 Talleh, Rami From: Asamarin1 @verizon.net Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 6:46 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Morris Samarin Garden Grove, Ca. 92845 Asamarin1 @verizon.net 1-714-890-3591 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner Talleh, Rami From: gbuley@aol.com Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 3:47 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Joe & Geri Buley Huntington Beach, CA 92649 gbuley@aol.com 714-840-9764 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner s Talleh, Rami From: mwind@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 10:18 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Melissa Overton Huntington Beach, CA 92647 mwind@yahoo.com 714-329-7151 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 9 Talleh, Rami From: lucyml@earthlink.net Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 9:35 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Dean and Lucy Mouren- Laurens Huntington Beach, CA 92647 lucyml@earthlink.net 714 847 6622 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 10 Talleh, Rami From: dalyaaviv@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 5:55 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Dalya Aviv Huntigton Beach, CA 92647 dalyaaviv@yahoo.com 239-471-7668 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 11 Talleh, Rami From: barbara.hunt3@verizon.net Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 8:51 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Barbara Hunt Huntington Beach, CA 92647 barbara.hunt3@verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 12 Talleh, Rami From: ragocarla@aol.com Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 7:01 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Carla Rago Huntington Beach, Ca 92647 ragocarla@aol.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 13 Talleh, Rami From: dianehayes7@cbank.com Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 3:14 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Diane Hayes Huntington Beach, CA 92647 dianehayes7@cbank.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 14 Talleh, Rami From: adamrodell@aol.com Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 10:51 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Adam Rodell Huntington Beach, CA 92647 adamrodell@aol.com 714-747-2117 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 15 Talleh, Rami From: robinrbowen@verizon.net Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 9:32 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Robin Bowen Huntington Beach, CA 92647 robinrbowen@verizon.net (714) 842-1519 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 16 Talleh, Rami From: tcstoddard@verizon.net Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 9:26 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. thomas Stoddard Huntington Beach, CA 92647 tcstoddard@verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 17 Talleh, Rami From: rlafey@msn.com Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:42 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Robert Lafey Huntington beach, CA 92647 rlafey@msn.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 18 Talleh, Rami From: hbproducer@aol.com Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 4:41 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Richard A. Benvenuti Huntington Beach, Ca 92649 hbproducer@aol.com 714 846-8667 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 19 Talleh, Rami From: quevyngreen@msn.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 9:07 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Kevin Green Huntington Beach, CA 92647 quevyngreen@msn.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 20 Talleh, Rami From: jlippold@socal.rr.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:38 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. John Lippold Huntington Beach, CA 92647 jlippold@socal.rr.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 21 Talleh, Rami From: harterfoist@earthlink.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:27 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Brian Foist Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5608 harterfoist@earthlink.net 714-848-2016 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 22 Talleh, Rami From: Barbara@BarbaraSellsTheBeach.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 7:59 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Barbara Delgleize Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Barbara@BarbaraSellsTheBeach.com 714 421-0103 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 23 Talleh, Rami From: flyinlion@socal.rr.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 7:39 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Charles Leech Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5629 flyinlion@socal.rr.com (714) 848-6806 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 24 Talleh, Rami From: ae.cruz@verizon.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:13 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Allan Cruz Huntington Beach, ca 92648 ae.cruz@verizon.net 714-225-2789 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 25 Talleh, Rami From: donna@cga.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:06 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Donna Witteborn Huntington Beach, Ca 92647 donna@cga.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 26 Talleh, Rami From: vkoble@verizon.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:05 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Vanessa Koble Huntington Beach, CA 92647 vkoble@verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 27 Talleh, Rami From: khight001 @socal.rr.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:45 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Karen Hight huntington beach, CA 92647 khight001 @socal.rr.com 714-345-7867 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 28 Talleh, Rami From: pastorfam@verizon.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:39 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Michael Gibson Huntington Beach, CA 92647 pastorfam@verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 29 Talleh, Rami From: kathygibson@marykay.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:37 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Kathryne Gibson Huntington Beach, CA 92647 kathygibson@marykay.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 30 Talleh, Rarni From: cbarsh@verizon.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:13 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Chris Barsh huntington beach, CA 92647 cbarsh@verizon.net 714-841-3953 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 31 Talleh, Rami From: mary.healey@verzion.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:00 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. john healey huntington beach, ca 92647 mary.healey@verzion.net 714 840 1284 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 32 Talleh, Rami From: rwroth6@aol.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:47 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Ronald Roth Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5651 rwroth6@aol.com 1-714-847-1594 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 33 Talleh, Rarni From: AimeeHale79@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:39 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Aimee Hale Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679 AimeeHale79@yahoo.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member, Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 34 Talleh, Rami From: rwroth6@aol.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:37 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Ronald Roth Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5651 rwroth6@aol.com 1-714-847-1594 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 35 Talleh, Rami From: whojr@verizon.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:37 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. William Oram Huntington Beach, Ca 92647 whojr@verizon.net 714-848-8554 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 36 Talleh, Rami From: dave@toolalliance.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:27 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps DearA Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. DavidA Povich Huntington Beach,A CAA 92649 dave@toolalliance.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 37 Talleh, Rami From: nigabg@aol.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:25 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. arthur goldberg huntington beach, ca 92647 nigabg@aol.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 38 Talleh, Rami From: conflakes@socal.rr.com Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 7:22 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. connie orr huntington beach, ca. 92647 conflakes@socal.rr.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 39 Talleh, Rami From: saberryhot@hotmail.com Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:21 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Scott Berry Huntington Beach, CA 92647 saberryhot@hotmail.com 202-657-2665 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 40 Page 1 of 1 Talleh, Rami From: jud.duffy@verizon.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:57 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. William & Judith Duffy Huntington Beach, CA 92683 jud.duffy@ven'zon.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 5/18/2009 Page 1 of 1 Talleh, Rami From: jud.duffy@verizon.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:56 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. William Duffy Huntington Beach, CA 92683 jud.duffy@verizon.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 5/18/2009 Page 1 of 1 Talleh, Rami From: konol @socal.rr.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 12:55 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Kenneth Ono Huntington Beach, CA 92647 konol@socal.rr.com 714-841-1157 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 5/18/2009 Page 1 of 1 Talleh, Rami From: kono1 @socal.rr.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 12:52 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Shirley Ono Huntington Beach, CA 92647 konol@socal.rr.com 714-841-1157 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 5/18/2009 Page 1 of 1 Talleh, Rami From: rob@albertgrover.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 1:30 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Rob Kuehn Huntington Beach, CA 92647 rob@albertgrover.com 714-847-9596 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 5/18/2009 Talleh, Rami From: nmustafa@asg-assetsolutionsgroup.com Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 10:14 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Nasser Mustafa Huntington Beach, CA 92646 nmustafa@asg-assetsolutionsgroup.com 7145539595 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner i Talleh, Rami From: christine.medina@sheahomes.com Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 5:45 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Christine Medina Fullerton, CA 92832 christine.medina@sheahomes.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner z Talleh, Rami From: cohpor@earthliink.net Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 4:04 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps DearA Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. DeniseA Porter Huntington Beach,A CAA 92647 cohpor@earthliink.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 3 Talleh, Rami From: michael.ayala@sheahomes.com Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 11:48 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. michael ayala chino hills, ca 91709 michael.ayala@sheahomes.com 951-264-0965 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 4 Talleh, Rami From: jshatney@hearthside-homes.com Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:03 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Julie Shatney Garden Grove, CA 92845 jshatney@hearthside-homes.com 714-898-1662 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 5 Talleh, Rami From: cawendl@corecon.com Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 7:59 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Christine Wendl Huntington Beach, CA 92647 cawendl@corecon.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 6 Talleh, Rami From: Saylorcat22@hotmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 5:50 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Frederick Marsh Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Saylorcat22@hotmail.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner Talleh, Ram! From: artman47@verizon.net Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:16 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps DearA Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Joseph @ HarrietA Boyer Huntington Beach,A CAA 92647 artman47@verizon.net 714-596-2358 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 8 Talleh, Rami From: jeantowgood@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 11:45 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Jean Towgood Huntington Beach, CA 92647 jeantowgood@gmail.com 714-842-6066 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 9 Talleh, Rami From: yogesh.r.parikh@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 7:03 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Yogesh Parikh Huntington Beach, CA 92647 yogesh.r.parikh@gmail.com 714-841-1394 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 10 Talleh, Rami From: louisehinkle@mac.com Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 6:01 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps DearA Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. RichardA Hinkle Huntington Beach,A CAA 92647 louisehinkle@mac.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner Talleh, Rami From: rfoat@verizon.net Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 3:03 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Bryan Foat Huntington Beach, CA 92647 rfoat@verizon.net 714 840-6541 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 12 Talleh, Rami From: rfoat@verizon.net Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 3:02 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Joanne Foat Huntington Beach, CA 92647 rfoat@verizon.net 714 840-6541 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 13 Talleh, Rami From: rfoat@verizon.net Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 3:00 PM To: Tafleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Richard Foat Huntington Beach, CA 92647 rfoat@verizon.net 714 840-6541 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 14 Talleh, Rami From: lundr79@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:32 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Robert Lund Huntington Beach, CA 92647 lundr79@yahoo.com 714-323-7593 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 15 Talleh, Rami From: stusouders@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:37 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Stuart Souders Huntington Beach, CA 92647 stusouders@yahoo.com 714 841 1565 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 16 Talleh, Rami From: Gobruin@aol.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:31 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Ray & Linda Williams Huntiington Beach, CA 92647 Gobruin@aol.com 714 842-4038 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 17 Talleh, Rami From: drift_cowboy@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 5:04 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Tom Teissere Huntington.Beach, Ca 92647 drift—cowboy@ya hoo.co m 714 30 2418 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 18 Talleh, Rami From: dbeichen@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:08 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Douglas Eichen Huntington Beach, CA 92647 dbeichen@aol.com 714 842-0206 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 1 Talleh, Rami From: mike.hathaway@verizon.net Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 8:47 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Mike Hathaway Huntington Beach, CA 92647 mike.hathaway@verizon.net 714 840-8729 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 2 Talleh, Rami From: mike.hathaway@verizon.net Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 8:46 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Mike Hathaway Huntington Beach, CA 92647 mike.hathaway@verizon.net 714 840-8729 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 3 Talleh, Rami From: kaz_daniel@hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 10:43 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Daniel Kaz Huntington Beach, ca 92647 kaz_daniel@hotmail.com 714-330-6119 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 4 Talleh, Rami From: jvogrin@socal.rr.com Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 7:16 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Joseph Vogrin Jr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 jvogrin@socal.rr.com 714-846-6713 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 5 Talleh, Rami From: gbuley@aol.com Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 4:21 PM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Joe & Geri Buley Huntington Beach, CA 92649 gbuley@aol.com 714-840-9764 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 6 Talleh, Rami From: memiller@cox.net Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 11:35 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. mary miller corona, ca 92883 memiller@cox.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner Talleh, Rami From: ada.temores@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 10:36 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. ada Temores Chino, CA 91710 ada.temores@yahoo.com 909-732-3215 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 8 Talleh, Rami From: f.muzic@verizon.net Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 10:28 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Fred Muzic Huntington Beach, CA 92647 f.muzic@verizon.net 714-835-3740 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 9 Talleh, Rami From: I.muzic@verizon.net Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 10:26 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Lynne Muzic Huntington Beach, CA 92647 l.muzic@verizon.net 714-835-3740 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 10 Talleh, Rami From: HBNONI@aol.com Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 10:17 AM To: Talleh, Rami Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Robert Hoxsie Huntington Beach, CA 92647 HBNONI@aol.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner 11 ATTACHMENT # 15 �o �, a � � -.�„ a r,<. a � � � g �� �Y x f fir, `� d ',.� R � �,_ , e.. F. � 4� �_ � �, ;; :,..: � ��>,. F _ � �"y c '" ,,spa r .:��,�� $� y .. s �� .�. .z. r ... �_�: - .:_ - �sae .<a�u�\ a.�\��....; \a� �` `�.y ��-: � �; ,� .�. - a � � � v � . x � � � � u, _y r c \ � � �' �� >, '- �,; ,; � ..� �� F � j. i �O l� Z ��\ �3. S:. _ ... l�� �" -f ,.,/; � Y '_ ss � � r�„+.. .stz � � ': � � �� �� �i �; s,;,. .. „t ,; ., ,.. sts*.x s c � ..o ,r -v�.�aa�� E „, �.'m ..a mom' �, �-_ y" . � o i �z. ryy; 4 , e �'; � ® o x. e.e a p { R � i 6 £ #4d '� � a a. <r a a ! ! ° PARKSIDE ESTATES HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA DRAFT ADDENDUM EIR TO EIR #97-2 SCH #97091051 Prepared for: The City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Prepared by: EDAW, Inc. 2737 Campus Drive Irvine, CA 92612 May 2009 MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................1-1 1.2 CEQA BASIS FOR THIS ADDENDUM .....................................................................1-2 1.3 PURPOSE AND INTENDED USES OF THIS ADDENDUM......................................1-4 1.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND ADDENDUM FINDINGS.......................................................................................................................1-5 1.4.1 Summary Impact Comparison............................................................................1-5 1.5 EXISTING DOCUMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.................1-10 1.6 CONTACT PERSONS................................................................. ................................1-10 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................................2-1 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION ..................................................................................................2-1 2.2 PROJECT SITE HISTORY.............................................................................................2-1 2.2.1 Prior CEQA Documentation...............................................................................2-3 2.3 CITY APPROVED PROJECT(2002).............................................................................2-4 2.3.1 Previous Discretionary Actions by the City of Huntington Beach.....................2-4 2.4 CITY LCP AMENDMENT REQUEST/CCC APPROVAL OF LUP AMENDMENT WITH SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS ...........................................2-8 2.4.1 City LCP Request...............................................................................................2-8 2.4.2 CCC-Suggested Modifications to the LUP Amendment....................................2-8 2.5 COMPARISON OF PROJECT(2002 VERSUS 2008)................................................2-11 2.6 PROJECT COMMITMENTS........................................................................................2-14 3.0 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS................................3-1 3.1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY......................................................................................3-2 3.1.1 Existing Environmental Setting..........................................................................3-2 3.1.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts........................................................3-3 3.1.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis.......................................................................3-3 3.1.4 Cumulative Impacts............................................................................................3-5 3.1.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures................................................3-5 3.1.6 Conclusion..........................................................................................................3-5 3.2 AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE ............................................................................3-6 3.2.1 Existing Environmental Setting..........................................................................3-6 3.2.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts........................................................3-6 3.2.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis.......................................................................3-7 3.2.4 Cumulative Impacts............................................................................................3-9 3.2.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures................................................3-9 3.2.6 Conclusion........................................................................................................3-10 3.3 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION........................................................................3-11 3.3.1 Existing Environmental Setting........................................................................3-11 3.3.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts......................................................3-11 3.3.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis.....................................................................3-12 3.3.4 Cumulative Ilmpacts..........................................................................................3-13 3.3.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures..............................................3-13 3.3.6 Conclusion........................................................................................................3-14 PARKSIDE ESTATES i ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 3.4 AIR QUALITY..............................................................................................................3-15 3.4.1 Existing Environmental Setting........................................................................3-15 3.4.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts......................................................3-15 3.4.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis.....................................................................3-15 3.4.4 Cumulative Impacts..........................................................................................3-20 3.4.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures..............................................3-20 3.4.6 Conclusion........................................................................................................3-21 3.5 NOISE ..........................................................................................................................3-23 3.5.1 Existing Environmental Setting........................................................................3-23 3.5.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts......................................................3-23 3.5.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis.....................................................................3-24 3.5.4 Cumulative Impacts..........................................................................................3-24 3.5.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures..............................................3-24 3.5.6 Conclusion........................................................................................................3-25 3.6 EARTH RESOURCES..................................................................................................3-26 3.6.1 Existing Environmental Setting........................................................................3-26 3.6.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts......................................................3-26 3.6.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis.....................................................................3-27 3.6.4 Cumulative Impacts..........................................................................................3-28 3.6.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures..............................................3-28 3.6.6 Conclusion........................................................................................................3-29 3.7 DRAINAGE/HYDROLOGY........................................................................................3-30 3.7.1 Existing Environmental Setting........................................................................3-30 3.7.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts......................................................3-30 3.7.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis.....................................................................3-31 3.7.4 Cumulative Impacts..........................................................................................3-33 3.7.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures..............................................3-33 3.7.6 Conclusion........................................................................................................3-34 3.8 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................3-35 3.8.1 Existing Environmental Setting........................................................................3-35 3.8.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts......................................................3-36 3.8.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis.....................................................................3-36 3.8.4 Cumulative Impacts..........................................................................................3-39 3.8.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures..............................................3-39 3.8.6 Conclusion........................................................................................................3-39 3.9 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES.........................................3-41 3.9.1 Existing Environmental Setting........................................................................3-41 3.9.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts......................................................3-41 3.9.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis.....................................................................3-41 3.9.4 Cumulative Impacts..........................................................................................3-42 3.9.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures..............................................3-42 3.9.6 Conclusion........................................................................................................3-43 3.10 PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES........................................................................3-44 3.10.1 Existing Environmental Setting........................................................................3-44 3.10.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts......................................................3-44 PARKSIDE ESTATES ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 3.10.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis.....................................................................3-45 3.10.4 Cumulative Impacts..........................................................................................3-46 3.10.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures..............................................3-46 3.10.6 Conclusion........................................................................................................3-49 APPENDICES APPENDIX A—CCC-Adopted Findings and Certification Letter APPENDIX B—Revised Mitigation Monitoring Program-2008 APPENDIX C—Parkside Estates Sustainability Program PARKSIDE ESTATES iii ADDENDUM EJIZ MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBITS Exhibit 2-1: Project Location.............................................................................................................2-2 Exhibit 2-2: City-Approved Land Use Plan(2002)............................................................................2-5 Exhibit 2-3: Revised LUP with CCC-Suggested Modification(2008)..............................................2-6 Exhibit2-4: 2002 TTM....................................................................................................................2-12 Exhibit2-5: 2008 TTM....................................................................................................................2-13 TABLES Table 1-1: Land Use Comparison........................................................................................................1-2 Table 1-2: Comparison of Impacts between the Approved 2002 Project and Revised2008 Project...........................................................................................................................1-6 Table 2-1: Summary of CCC-Suggested Modifications....................................................................2-10 Table 3-1: Summary of Trip Generation Rate Comparisons.............................................................3-12 Table 3-2: Project Emission Summary/Criteria Pollutants .............................................................3-16 Table 3-3: Project Emission Summary/GHG .................................................................................3-19 PARKSIDE ESTATES iv ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document supersedes and is an Addendum to the previously certified 2002 Parkside Estates EIR No. 97-2. The Addendum EIR addresses the potential environmental impacts of the changes to the Project previously approved by the City and as certified by the California Coastal Commission(CCC) action and changes to the existing conditions that have occurred since certification of EIR No. 97.2. The previously certified 2002 Parkside Estates EIR No. 97-2 and Addendum EIR, together with the CCC's adopted revised findings approving City LUP Amendment No. 1-06 and the other environmental documents incorporated by reference herein, serve as the environmental review of the Parkside Estates Project as modified. 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND The Shea Homes Parkside Estates Project(Parkside Estates Project) is proposed for an approximately 50-acre (ac) site in the City of Huntington Beach (City). The City prepared a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Parkside Estates Project in 2002 (EIR No. 97-2). The City certified the EIR, adopted the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and approved the related Local Coastal Program (LCP) Amendment, General Plan Amendment (GPA), Zone Change, Tentative Tract Maps (TTMs), Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Coastal Development Permit (CDP) and annexation of a 5-acre parcel that was located in Orange County (County). The discretionary actions approved 170 dwelling units overall and amended General Plan designations and zoning to reflect the planned low-density residential development, proposed public park, and conservation areas. The CUP approved the Planned Unit Development(PUD),the exceedance of a 3-foot(ft)grade differential on the site, and approval of grading and stockpiling that exceeds 25,000 cubic yards (cy) of import. The City forwarded the LCP Amendment and Implementation Plan to the California Coastal Commission (CCC) for review and certification in 2002. The City later withdrew the Implementation Plan portion of the LCP Amendment request to allow the Land Use Plan (LUP) Amendment to be heard and approved first. Between 2003 and 2008, the applicant was engaged in additional studies, meetings with City and CCC staff, and several CCC hearings. As a result of all these efforts, including the CCC's Suggested Modifications to the LUP Amendment, the following key changes to the Project plans have been made: • The area designated for Open Space-Conservation(OS-C) increased from 3.7 ac to 23.1 ac (including a 0.6 ac passive park). • The area designated for an active/passive park decreased from 8.4 ac to 1.6 ac (a 1.0 ac active park in RL and 0.6 ac in OS-Q. • The development footprint was reduced from 37.4 to 26.4 ac. • A Natural Treatment System (NTS) was added for storm water treatment, with a supplemental mechanical storm water system Best Management Practices(BMP). • The addition of approximately 6.2 ac of wetland creation/restoration and preservation, plus buffers. • The expansion of the eucalyptus Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) designation to include all of the southern and northern eucalyptus groves, plus a variable-width ESHA buffer, which includes restricted public access. Final EIR No. 97-2 included as eucalyptus ESHA only the portion of the southern eucalyptus trees that was included in the original CDFG ESHA recommendation. PARKSIDE ESTATES 1-I ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH The CCC, at its May 7, 2008, meeting in Marina del Rey, adopted revised findings reflecting the CCC's action of November 14, 2007, in which it approved the City LUP Amendment No. 1-06 with modifications. LUP Amendment No. 1-06 is reflected in City Council Resolution No. 2002-123, which accepted the CCC modifications. These adopted findings are contained in Appendix A of this document and are referenced throughout Sections 2.0 and 3.0. The approved amendment, as modified, provides land use designations and LUP text for the Parkside Estates area of the LCP, as well as corollary changes to the area known as Parkside, an area that was deferred certification at the time the City's LCP was certified. The City has since updated the Coastal Element of the General Plan to reflect the CCC's action in June and November 2008. The LUP Amendment was effectively certified on August 7, 2008. The following table (Table 1-1) provides a land use summary and comparison of the 2002 City-approved Project analyzed in EIR No. 97-2 and the 2008 CCC-approved LUP Amendment modifications. Table 1-1 Land Use Comparison 2002 Project Revised Project Difference Land Use Acres Units Acres Units Acres Units (net) (net) (net) Residential(RL) 37.4 170 26.4 ill -11 -59 Open Space—Park OS-P 8.4 n/a n/a n/a -8.4 n/a Open Space — Conservation 3.7 n/a 23.1 n/a +19.4 n/a OS-C Total 49.5 170 49.5 ill 0 -59 Source:Hunsaker(2008). 1.2 CEQA BASIS FOR THIS ADDENDUM Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City is the Lead Agency charged with the responsibility of deciding whether to approve the proposed Project changes consistent with the CCC modifications to the LCP. As part of its decision-making process, the City is required to review and consider potential environmental effects that could result from construction and operation of the revised Project. Certified EIR No. 97-2 found no effects of Project development to be significant unavoidable impacts. Likewise, the CCC found that the LUP Amendment, as modified, would not result in significant adverse environmental impacts within the meaning of CEQA. The CCC environmental review of an LCP Amendment is treated as the functional equivalent of the EIR process, under Section 21080.5 of CEQA and Sections 15251(c)and 15265 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 21080.9 of the California Public Resources Code,within CEQA, exempts local governments from the requirement of preparing an EIR in connection with its activities and approvals necessary for the preparation and adoption of an LCP. Instead, the CEQA responsibilities are assigned to the CCC. The CCC's LCP review and approval program was found by the State Resources Agency to be functionally equivalent to the EIR process. Thus, under Section 21080.5 of CEQA, the CCC is relieved of its responsibility to prepare an EIR for each LCP. Nevertheless, the CCC is required to approve an LCP submittal and to find that the LCP does conform with the provisions of CEQA, including the requirement in CEQA Section 21080.5(d)(2)(A) that the amended LUP will not be approved or adopted as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures PARKSIDE ESTATES 1-2 ADDEND UM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH available that would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact the activity may have on the environment'. The CCC found that the LUP Amendment, as modified, is consistent with the public access and recreation, wetland, ESHA, marine resource, and land resource policies of the Coastal Act. Thus, the CCC found that the proposed LUP Amendment,as modified,meets the requirements of and conforms with the Chapter 3 policies of the Coastal Act. In addition, the CCC found that approval of the LUP Amendment, as modified, will not result in significant adverse environmental impacts under the meaning of CEQA(CCC Adopted Findings,pp.4, 62-63). Thus, two CEQA reviews have been completed for the Project: the Certified EIR and the CEQA equivalent review that the Coastal Commission completed in connection with its approval of the LUP Amendment. The City has prepared this CEQA addendum to include information in their files and public record that could be easily referenced and to document the changes to the City's originally approved Project. Current City review of the modifications to the Project, including the revised TTMs, CUP, and other related Project components, is limited by provisions set forth in CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, this Addendum documents whether there are changes in circumstances or new information of substantial importance that would require preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR since certified EIR No. 97-2 and CEQA review as part of approved LUP Amendment No. 1-06 have already been'completed. It is the City's intent to prepare this Addendum with analysis that demonstrates if the City-certified CEQA documents including mitigation measures and the CEQA equivalent review completed by the Coastal Commission are still adequate for the Project changes and any new City polices and requirements that have come about since the original approval. According to Section 21166 of CEQA and Section, 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, a subsequent FIR is not required for the changes to the proposed Project unless the City determines on the basis of substantial evidence that one or more of the following conditions are met: 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the Project that require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes have occurred with respect to circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, shows any of the following: • The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; • Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than identified in the previous EIR; • Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project,but the Project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or 14 California Code of Regulations(CCR) Sections 13542(a), 13540(f),and 13555(b). PARKSIDE ESTATES 1-3 ADDEND UM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH • Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the Project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. According to the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15163, if any of the conditions noted above are present but only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequate to apply to the Project in the changed situation,a supplemental EIR may be prepared. Section 15164 of State CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum to an EIR shall be prepared "if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred."Thus, if none of the above conditions are met, the City may not require preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. Rather, the City can decide that no further environmental documentation is necessary or can require that an Addendum be prepared. In this regard, the City finds that an Addendum to the previously certified Final EIR is appropriate.The rationale and the facts for this finding are provided in the body of this Addendum. An addendum in this instance could limit its review to a determination of whether there are changes in circumstances or new information of substantial importance since Certified EIR No. 97-2 and Certified LUP Amendment No. 1-06 that warrant preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. This Addendum, however, adopts a more conservative approach, and compares the environmental effects of the development of the revised Project with those of the original Project previously disclosed in EIR No. 97-2. It also reviews new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with exercise of reasonable diligence at the time EIR No. 97-2 was certified and evaluates whether there are new or more severe significant environmental effects associated with changes in circumstances under which Project development is being undertaken. It further examines whether, as a result of any changes or any new information, a subsequent or supplemental EIR may be required. This examination includes an analysis of provisions of Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines and their applicability to the Project. The focus of the examination is on whether the previous EIR No. 97-2, in conjunction with the CCC action on LUP Amendment No. 1-06, continues to satisfy CEQA requirements. 1.3 PURPOSE AND INTENDED USES OF THIS ADDENDUM An FIR is an informational document used in the planning and decision-making process. The purpose of an EIR is not to recommend either approval or denial of a project; but rather to disclose objective information regarding potentially significant environmental impacts, so that informed decisions can be made. The intent of this Addendum is to provide to decision-makers additional information regarding the Project's environmental impacts due to Project modifications subsequent to the certification of the EIR No. 97.2. The document completes the environmental analysis consistent with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.,and State CEQA Guidelines. The Project reviewed in this Addendum includes changes to the Project previously approved by the City and as certified by CCC action, and includes the following requested entitlements and approvals needed to adopt the CCC modifications: • Approval of this Addendum to certified EIR No. 97-2 to address the potential environmental effects of changes made to the Project since the original City approval and FIR certification in 2002 and CCC approval of the LUP in 2008. • Approval of revised TTMs 15377 and 15419. PARKSIDE ESTATES 1-4 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH • Approval of a revised CUP and CDP(approval in concept). • Approval of the amendment to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 1.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND ADDENDUM FINDINGS This Addendum compares the anticipated environmental effects of the revised Project as modified by CCC action with those disclosed in EIR No. 97-2 and LUP Amendment No. 1-06 to review whether any conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR are met. Potential environmental effects of the Project are addressed for each of the following areas: • Land Use Compatibility • Aesthetics/Light and Glare • Transportation/Circulation • Air Quality • Noise • Earth Resources • Drainage/Hydrology • Biological Resources • Cultural and Paleontological Resources • Public Services and Utilities Section 3.0 of this document contains analyses and explanations of potential environmental impacts of the changes to the Project as a result of CCC-suggested modifications to the LCP Amendment.The analyses provide the City a basis for its determination that no subsequent or supplemental EIR will be required for the Project. 1.4.1 Summary Impact Comparison The following table (Table 1-2) provides a comparison of the environmental impacts of the current Project modifications, the subject of the current Addendum, with the Project impacts analyzed in Certified EIR No. 97-2. As analyzed in Section 3.0 of this document, the changes being proposed for this Project would not result in any new significant environmental effects or substantial increases in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Consequently, major revisions to the Certified EIR are not required and none of the other conditions listed in Section 15162(a)that would require the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. Therefore, the appropriate level of analysis for the proposed Project revision is an Addendum to the Final EIR, as required by Section 15164(a). This conclusion is based on the analysis provided in this document and is supported by updated technical studies (see Section 1.5) and other information included in the administrative record. Substantial evidence in the record supports the conclusion that the revised Project does not create any new or increased significant impacts as compared to the original Project. Thus,no supplemental environmental review is required. PARKSIDE ESTATES 1-5 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Table 1-2 Comparison of Impacts between the Approved 2002 Project and Revised 2008 Project Issues Analyzed Approved 2002 Project Revised 2008 Project Land Use Compatibility • No impacts identified related to on-site residential • Revised Project reduced unit count (59 less units) land use relationships and between the proposed and greater open space(20 acres)result in minimal park and proposed residential uses. changes to the 2002 Project conclusions regarding • No impacts identified to land use relationships on-site and off-site land use relationships between between the proposed residential and park and the the proposed park/open space and proposed adjacent land uses and off-site residential uses. residential uses. • Potential significant impact related to provision of • No changes to the conclusion regarding Project affordable housing and cumulative impact related consistency with the City's General Plan and to inconsistencies with the City Affordable Bolsa Chica LCP. Housing Policy. Mitigation Measure 1 was • Affordable housing has been satisfied through provided. acquisition of off-site units and Mitigation Measure 1 has therefore been met. Aesthetics/Light and Glare • No identified impacts to visual resources on the • Positive effect on the visual resources with habitat site. creation and new public access. • Potential impact related to reduction of viewable • Reduced impact with regard to changes to open space area. Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 viewable open space compared with the Project as were provided. evaluated in the 2002. Mitigation Measure 1 and 2 • No removal of eucalyptus trees and tree remain applicable. replacement. Mitigation Measure 3 no longer • Public vista location is included in the revised applicable. Project. • No identified impacts to existing or proposed City • Project street system available to the public and no scenic routes. change to the trail system. Mitigation Measure 4 • Potential impact related to County-proposed trails. remains applicable. Mitigation Measure 4 was provided. • Reduced impact related to increased light and • Potential on-site and off-site impact related to glare generated on-site from development and increased light and glare generated on-site from associated vehicles. Mitigation Measures 1 development and associated vehicles. Mitigation through 3 remain applicable. Measures 1 through 3 were provided. PARKSIDE ESTATES 1-6 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Issues Analyzed Approved 2002 Project Revised 2008 Project Transportation/Circulation • Potential impact related to short-term construction • Reduction in short-term construction trips due to due to addition of truck and construction traffic reduced grading and construction. Mitigation vehicles. Mitigation Measure l was provided. Measure 1 for construction remains applicable. • No significant impact related to vehicular traffic • Reduced overall traffic impacts due to reduction in increases (2,040 ADT) at the modeled number of units and corresponding ADT of 1,332. intersections and roadway segments under the Mitigation Measures remain applicable. existing plus Project conditions. • CCC-suggested Modification No. 5 is consistent • Potential impact to pedestrian, bicycle, and with, and builds upon, Mitigation Measures 2 vehicular safety related to establishment of access through 4 regarding pedestrian and bicycle safety and an on-site circulation system. Mitigation along the Project perimeter. Measures 2 through 4 were provided. • No new cumulative impacts or increase in an • Potential cumulative impacts related to LOS impact previously identified. Mitigation Measure deficiencies at the intersections of Bolsa Chica 5 remains applicable. Street/Warner Avenue and Graham Street/Warner Avenue under the 2020 condition. Mitigation Measure 5 was provided. Air Quality • Potential short-term impact related to exceeding • Fewer haul trips due to reduced number of units SCAQMD's daily threshold emissions levels for and less imported soil. Mitigation Measures 1 NOx during construction activities. Mitigation through 6 for short-term construction emission measures 1 through 6 were provided. impacts remain applicable. • No SCAQMD daily thresholds would be exceeded • Reduction in vehicular emissions due to reduction by the Project's long-term emissions; however, in number of units. Mitigation Measures 7 and 8 Mitigation Measures 7 and 8 were provided to remain applicable. reduce Project's incremental impact. • Revised Project results in approximately 1,200 • Potential long-term cumulative impacts related to fewer tons of GHG emissions and incorporates a incremental contribution to emissions to the Basin, sustainability program. designated as non-attainment. Mitigation • GHG emissions from the Project are not "new" Measures 7 and 8 were provided, emissions compared to 2002 Project. GHG emissions are from sources previously disclosed in 2002 Project. Noise • Potential impacts related to short-term • Reduction in construction equipment noise due to construction noise increase. Mitigation Measures reduced unit count and quantity of import soil. 1 and 2 were provided. Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 for construction PAAKSIDE ESTATES 1_7 ADDENDUAI EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Issues Analyzed Approved 2002 Project Revised 2008 Project • Potential impact to on- and off-site homes from remain applicable. Noise (Cont'd.) future active park uses. Mitigation Measure 3 was • No on-site and off-site impact due to reduced provided. active park size and uses. Mitigation Measure 3 is • No significant impact related to increase in traffic not necessary with the revised Project. noise levels along Graham Street. • Reduction in Project's contribution to vehicular • No significant cumulative impacts related to noise due to reduction in number of units and incremental increase in traffic noise levels in 2020. associated traffic. Earth Resources • Potential impacts related to settlements of peat • Reduction in units would result in fewer deposits within the upper five feet which could residences exposed to potential seismic, soils, and continue over the design life of the structures. ground shaking related risks. The Final EIR • Potential impacts related to on-site, mildly to Mitigation Measures I through 3 for the potential severely corrosive soils from soils with poor geologic risks remain applicable. pavement support characteristics, soils with low • Reduction in units would reduce the amount of shear strength, and impacts from soils shrinkage. dewatering required, lowering the potential for Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 were provided. local subsidence impacts. Mitigation Measure 4 • Potential impact related to ground shaking, remains applicable to the revised Project. liquefaction, and seismic settlement. Mitigation • Reduction in units would result in fewer Measures 1 through 3 were provided, residences exposed to potentially significant levels • Potential impact related to local subsidence of of residual hazardous materials in the soil from adjacent properties along the Project's northern prior farming operations. Mitigation Measures 5 property boundary and potential groundwater and 6 remain applicable. impacts due to dewatering. Mitigation Measure 4 was provided. • Potential impacts related to residual hazardous materials in the soil from prior farming operations. Mitigation Measures 5 and 6 were provided. Drainage/Hydrology • Potential impacts related to drainage pattern and • Reduction in number of units would result in less flooding. Mitigation Measure 1 was provided. runoff and fewer residences exposed to potential • Potential impacts related to water quality. flood related risks. Mitigation Measure 1 to Mitigation Measures 2 and 3 were provided. address the potential flood risks remains • Potential cumulative impacts related to drainage, applicable. flooding, and water quality. Mitigation Measures • Revised Project incorporates an NTS that uses 1 through 3 were provided. vegetated constructed wetland and open water to PARKSIDE ESTATES 1-8 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Issues Analyzed Approved 2002 Project Revised 2008 Project treat storm water and weather runoff. The water Drainage/Hydrology treatment system would result in a net (Cont'd.) improvement in storm water quality discharged to the ocean. Mitigation Measures 2 and 3 remain applicable. Biological Resources • No identified impact related to the County parcel • Revised Project increases the on-site area wetland habitat. dedicated OS-C by 19.4 acres, increases the • Potential project-specific and cumulative impacts habitat value of the site, and improves storm water related to native raptor birds during the nesting quality. Mitigation Measure 1 related to raptors season. Mitigation Measure 1 was provided. remains applicable. Cultural and Paleontological • Potential impact related to archaeological sites • Revised Project grading and construction would be Resources CA-ORA-1308 and 1309. Mitigation Measures 1 reduced but would still involve ground through 3 were provided. disturbance. Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 • No identified impact to historic resources. remain applicable. ® No identified impact to paleontological resources. Public Services and Utilities • Potential project-specific and incremental • Overall reduction in service and utility demand cumulative impacts related to public services and due to 59 less units. Increase in number of utilities, including fire, police, schools, community elementary and middle school students due to services, water, sewage, natural gas, electrical Ocean View School District's modified student services and facilities. Mitigation Measures 1 generation factor. Decrease in number of high. through 18 were provided, school students. Mitigation Measures 1 through 18 remain applicable. • NTS would result in net improvement in storm water quality discharged to the ocean. PARKSIDE ESTATES 1-9 ADDEND UM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1.5 EXISTING DOCUMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Section 15150 of State CEQA Guidelines permits an environmental document to incorporate by reference other documents that provide relevant data. Documents listed below are hereby incorporated by reference and pertinent material is summarized throughout this Addendum where it is relevant to analyses of Project impacts. Documents incorporated by reference are available for review at the City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648, Attention: Mr. Scott Hess—Director of Planning. • Final EIR No. 97-2(2002) • Adopted CCC Findings for Major Amendment Request No. 1-06 to the City of Huntington Beach Certified LCP LUP(2008). Refer to Appendix B. • Revised(2008)Shea Homes project application for the Parkside Estates Project,including: o Revised TTM application o Entitlement Plan Amendment application o Revised Tentative Tract 15377 o Revised Tentative Tract 15419 o Preliminary Title Report for TTM 15377 o Preliminary Title Report for TTM 15419 o Water quality evaluation for TTMs 15377 and 15419 o Rough grading plans for TTM 15377 o Updated geotechnical reports o Recent photographs, printed index sheet of numbered photographs, and a photo key map depicting locations of photographs o Written narrative describing existing and proposed use of property o Revised site plans for revised Tentative Tract 15377 o Revised conceptual architectural floor plans and elevations o Revised conceptual landscape architectural plans o Revised phasing plan for Tentative Tract 15377 o Revised parking plan for Tentative Tract 15377 o Zoning conformance matrix relative to revised Tentative Tracts 15377 and 15419 o Revised Wall and Fence Plan for TTM 15377 Please see Appendix C of this Addendum for the Parkside Estates Sustainability Program (Sustainability Program)that was submitted as part of the revised application. 1.6 CONTACT PERSONS The Lead Agency for the Addendum for the Parkside Estates Project is the City of Huntington Beach. Questions about preparation of this Addendum, its assumptions, or its conclusions should be referred to: City of Huntington Beach Mr. Scott Hess—Director of Planning 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)536-5271 PARKSIDE ESTATES 1-1 0 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION The Project site is approximately 50 ac located on the west side of Graham Street between Warner Avenue and Slater Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach. The northern border of the site is bounded by existing medium-high density condominiums on Bolsa Chica Street and low-density residential development located along Greenleaf Lane and Kenilworth Drive. Graham Street bounds the eastern border,with low-density residential land uses located east of Graham Street. The southern border is bounded by the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel (which carries storm drain runoff to the Pacific Ocean), with low-density residential abutting the south side of the channel. The location of the Project in relation to the regional and local setting is displayed in Figure 2-1. 2.2 PROJECT SITE HISTORY The Project site is currently vacant and is being farmed for vegetables. The property has been subject to farming activities for over 50 years,including regular clearing, discing,and cultivation activities.A portion of the property was also used as a temporary equestrian facility, which has been abandoned and removed. A grove of eucalyptus trees has long existed on site near the northwest corner of the Project site. The Project site has been subject to planning and entitlement actions for several decades, and the site has been zoned for residential use since 1971. At the time EIR No. 97-2 was drafted, the Project site was divided between the City and unincorporated Orange County. The approximately 5 ac County parcel has since been annexed,and the entire Project site is currently within the City limits. Between 1952 and 1959,agricultural cultivation covered the majority of the Project site. By 1970,the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel, located south of the Project site, was constructed, and agricultural uses on the site continued. In 1974, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) purchased the site from Signal Landmark. In February 1975, stables were identified on the site. From June 1975 to December 1989, the Project site was leased to Roy C. Purshe for cultivation of crops. From 1980 to 1989, MWD leased portions of the site to Smoky's Stables. Historical site photos identify exercise and show rings, stables,and trailers on site. In 1986,the City took action to change the land use designation on most of the Project site (known as the MWD property) from Residential to Conservation in the Coastal Element LUP. At that time, the City was actively negotiating with the County over the ultimate land use for Bolsa Chica. The City decision in 1986 to designate the MWD property as Conservation was partly in response to a proposal by the County and Signal Landmark to intensively develop Bolsa Chica. The MWD was designated "Conservation" in response to the County's intense land use plan for Bolsa Chica. In 1988, a Bolsa Chica Coalition was successful in negotiating a much less intensive Bolsa Chica LUP. Consequently, the Bolsa Chica Coalition plan proposed residential development on the MWD property. PARKSIDE ESTATES 2-1 ADDENDUM EIR FAY ` 405 � P.is� tip O hQ� p PROJECT LOCATION Alt EXHIBIT 2-1 NO SCALE SOURCE:liunsakei&Associates,Inc. Project Location MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH In December 1981, the site was designated as "Severely Degraded Historic Wetland—Not Presently Functioning as Wetland."In February 1989, approximately 8.3 ac of the City parcel (along the north boundary below the eucalyptus trees found on site) and 0.4 ac of the County parcel were identified as jurisdictional wetlands by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In October 1991, a report by D.R. Sanders and Associates, Inc. concluded that the 8.3 ac area determined to be jurisdictional wetlands by the EPA is instead non jurisdictional "prior converted croplands." In May 1992, a letter from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) also reclassified the 8.3 ac area from "jurisdictional wetlands" by the EPA as "prior converted croplands;" therefore, it was not subject to Corps Section 404 permit requirements. In 1992, the CCC approved CDP 5-82-278 for another stable operation to be located on a portion of the site, including a parking area and caretaker residence. In September 1993, a portion of the site located in the City was subsequently leased for 1 year to Norman L. Abbott for agricultural purposes. On June 15, 1994, the CCC issued an Exemption Letter for "Hole-in-the-Wall" stable facilities, including 22 horse stalls on a 16,000-square-foot(sf)site. In January 1996, a letter was sent to MWD from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). This letter affirmed that none of the land making up the Project site lies within a prospective federal wetland restoration Project area (known as the Bolsa Chica Wetlands Restoration Project). In March 1996, the County portion of the site was analyzed as part of the overall Bolsa Chica Project EIR(Orange County Project No. 551).The Existing Habitats Map contained within this EIR described the City portion of the site as"Agricultural,""Ruderal,""Exotic Trees,"or"Nonnative Grassland."The County portion of the site was described as"Nonnative Grassland"or"Pickleweed." In September 1996, Shea Homes purchased the site. In January 1997, the CCC certified the Bolsa Chica Project LCP, in which the LCP designated the County portion of the site for residential development. 2.2.1 Prior CEQA Documentation The 50 ac site also has been evaluated in previous environmental planning documents, including: • Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/EIR for the Proposed Bolsa Chica Project, August 1992—The Project site was previously analyzed in 1992 as part of the larger 1,712 ac site proposed for development. The proposed land uses were residential. Preparation of the EIS/EIR was not completed,and therefore the report was never approved by the Lead Agencies. • Revised Draft EIR No. 551 for the Bolsa Chica Project LCP, December 14, 1994 — The Project site was previously analyzed as part of this EIR, which was certified by the County of Orange on December 14, 1994. The Board of Supervisors certification of Final EIR No. 551 was challenged by the filing of a petition for writ of mandate in Bolsa Chica Land Trust et al. v. County of Orange, Superior Court No. 741344. On February 16, 1996, the Orange County Superior Court rendered its decision in the lawsuit. The court rejected all challenges to the review of particular environmental impacts but also ruled that the reinstatement of the tidal inlet within the Project after the close of the public comment period on the 1994 Revised Draft EIR rendered the Project description unstable and required recirculation of the EIR. • Recirculated Draft EIR No. 551, March 1996—The County portion of the site was included as part of the Recirculated Draft EIR for the Bolsa Cbica Project, which contained a revised Project PARKSIDE ESTATES 2-3 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH description and the environmental analysis for the tidal inlet in accordance with the Orange County Superior Court's order of February 1996. General Plan Update FIR, May 1996 — The 44.66 ac portion of the Project site located in the City of Huntington Beach was evaluated within the General Plan Update EIR, which was certified on May 13, 1996. The General Plan, adopted on May 13, 1996, is composed of 16 separate elements: land use, urban design, housing, historic and cultural resources, economic development, growth management, circulation, public facilities and public services, recreation and community services, utilities, environmental resources/conservation, air quality, coastal, environmental hazards,noise, and hazardous materials. The Land Use Plan Map adopted with the General Plan designates the City portion of the Project site as RL-7 (Residential—Low-Density— maximum 7 units per acre) and OS-P(Open Space—Park). • EIR No. 97-2 - In September 1997, the City prepared an Initial Study for the proposed Shea Homes Project and determined that an EIR was necessary to analyze the potentially significant environmental effects associated with build out of the proposed Project. Draft EIR No. 97-2 was circulated for public review in 1998, and a document titled"Parkside Estates New Alternatives to the Draft Environmental Impact Report #97-2" was circulated in 2001. The Final EIR No. 97-2 was certified in October 2002. 2.3 CITY APPROVED PROJECT (2002) The proposed Project, as originally analyzed in the Draft EIR, was eventually rejected, and Alternative 7,Reduced Density Alternative(9-lot County)was approved by the City (see Exhibit 2-2, City-Approved Land Use Plan [2002]). The EIR evaluated Alternative 7 as a 171-unit Project,but the City approved Alternative 7 with 170 residential units. This Addendum considers the effects of the changes to the Project plans between approval of Alternative 7 (in 2002) and the CCC's suggested modifications to the LCP Amendment (see Exhibit 2-3, Revised LUP with CCC-Suggested Modifications [2008]). Alternative 7 resulted in reduced impacts compared with the original Project because it completely avoided impacts to the eucalyptus trees and to EPA-delineated "pocket" wetlands on the former County portion of the site. As a result of these changes to the original plan, Alternative 7 provided a buffer from the closest residential use to the southern grove of eucalyptus trees at the westerly edge of the Project site, as recommended by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). Based on City staff recommendations, one lot within the County parcel was deleted (during the City's approval process) to achieve a minimum 100 ft buffer between the proposed homes and the potential wetlands on the former County portion of the site, and the total number of units approved by the City was reduced to 170. 2.3.1 Previous Discretionary Actions by the City of Huntington Beach This section describes discretionary actions that were approved by the City in 2002 for the subject property. 1. Certification of EIR No.97-2.Acceptance of an environmental document as having been prepared in compliance with CEQA,the State CEQA Guidelines, City policies,and certification that the data were considered in final decisions on the Project. 2. Annexation 98-1.An annexation of the approximately 5 ac County parcel to the City through the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). A concurrent annexation to the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)also occurred. PARKSIDE ESTATES 2-4 ADDENDUM EIR \ v fin• % iet, 3-k �� �,�Y,\� F77, a - x - hN W a E •• a. x �, ,. .,\`�; ''. �, .fix,- ? r s.' ✓ \ °1. R114 Y rob � ,'F .,+s kal \E 16, C141 (H 3 4 %�� y S Y 15 Roll R - 3 41 Iv 01, R� ,IMM,,� l W, -M" :r LEGEND "x, '41m YX ' IWE % _P \ x sPARKS P A 3011 EXHIBIT 2-2 N NO SCALE SOURCE Hunsakei&Associates,Inc. City Approved Land Use Plan (2002) Pl- L - ,�;� c' k '�\�. � . .., - -ila �u� vems' �0 E p ;y IN 3 S 3 �,r •, - z Alm se e_ �l�+' r z ! 3 '' \ N iric a.:.'� Tyr 071 ' LEGEND � .. RESIDE 26 d,A ;t i fG , }y(-yg-g�� .g,'y y+,��ra�ppg.�a (dry,�A^}^y',�,�y� :�ysy-♦.,#ya � 4'PG8'N'S'T'Asd.'6.-OCONVEP'4Ya'R JON"23 k AC tAr E 1 F COMBINATION OF,ACTIV 'IaND PASSIVE 41 - PqJ LI PARK AN td S HBORK:I00 PARK } EXHIBIT 2-3 N NO SCALE SOURCE:Hmnaker&Associates,Inc. Revised Land Use Plan with CCC Suggested Modifications(2008) MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 3. General Plan Amendment No. 98-1. The City approved an Amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Map to accommodate a park site as part of the Project. The City approved modification to the Land Use Map so that a portion of the site designated RL-7 would be changed to OS-PR (Open Space Parks and Recreation) and OS-C (Open Space — Conservation). The City also removed the fire station designation and descriptions of a fire station on the site found within the General Plan. Since no lowland development was approved as part of the Bolsa Chica Project, the City determined that a fire station at this location was unnecessary. Therefore, the City removed this designation from Figure PF-1, Public Facility Locations of the Land Use Element. 4. Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-5. The City approved a zoning map amendment from Residential Agriculture—Coastal Zone(RA-CZ)to Open Space—Parks and Recreation—Coastal Zone (OS-PR-CZ), which would bring the zoning into consistency with the General PIan and amend a portion of the Residential Low-Density—Floodplain District Coastal Zone (RL-FP2- CZ)zone to OS-PR-CZ to reflect the park boundary. The purposes of the zone amendments were to: (1)correct an earlier omission on the zoning map; and (2) bring the zoning (on the park component of the Project) into consistency with the General Plan designation. Additionally, the City approved a zoning map amendment to pre-zone the approximately 5 ac County of Orange parcel as RL-FP2-CZ. 5. TTM 15377 (City) and TTM 15419 (County).The City approved TTM 15377 and TTM 15419 to subdivide the site into lots for development. 6. CUP No. 96-90.The City approved the CUP to allow for proposed development,which included the following: a. Development of 170 detached single-family units. b. Dual-product lot sizes to include 50 ft wide lots with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf(with an average lot size of over 5,700 sf), and 60 ft wide lots with a minimum lot size of 6,000 sf (with an average lot size of over 7,000 sf). c. Dedication and improvement of a 18.2 ac neighborhood public park. d. Improvement of two model home and sales complexes. e. Infrastructure improvements,including: • Widening and improvements to the north levee of the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel; • A new,enlarged storm drain; • Improvements to the Slater pump station; • Construction of a vegetated flood protection feature (VFPF)(formerly referred to as a sea wall); • Improvements to the sewer lift station and force main; and 7. CDP No. 96-18. The City approved a CDP (subject to CCC action) to permit subdivision and development of the property per CUP No. 96-90 and TTMs 15377 and 15419. 8. LCP Amendment No. 96-4. The City approved the LCP Amendment in order to have the residential zoning designation reflected in the City's LCP, resulting in the establishment of the Coastal Zone (CZ) District on the entire Project site. The City approved the following designations for the Project site: RL(Residential—Low Density),OS-PR, and OS-C. PARKSIDE ESTATES 2-7 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH The above-listed actions by the City occurred at the time the EIR was certified in 2002. The City subsequently applied to the CCC for certification of an LCP Amendment to amend the LUP and Implementation Program(IP),which are the two components of the LCP. The IP Amendment request was subsequently withdrawn to allow the LUP Amendment to be heard and approved first. A summary of CCC actions pertaining to the Project are provided in the following sections of this Addendum. 2.4 CITY LCP AMENDMENT REQUEST/CCC APPROVAL OF LUP AMENDMENT WITH SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS 2.4.1 City LCP Request LCP Amendment No. 1-06 was a request by the City of Huntington Beach for the CCC to amend the LUP portion of the LCP. The LUP Amendment was a project-specific amendment designed to make possible a low-density residential development on a vacant,approximately 50 ac site comprising three legal lots, most of which is currently in agricultural production. Of the total Project area, approximately 45 ac had long been located within the City. The remaining approximate 5 ac were, until 2004, located within unincorporated County of Orange jurisdiction. However, with the recent annexation, the entire site is currently within the city limits. Of the 45 ac portion of the site, approximately 40 ac were deferred CCC certification at the time the City's overall LCP was certified. The LCP Amendment incorporated the 40 ac and the newly annexed area into the City's existing LCP and established land use and zoning designations for those areas. The remaining 5 ac portion of the 45 ac area was certified as OS-C at the time the City's overall LCP was certified. The 40 ac area was originally deferred CCC certification due in part to potential wetland issues. The City's amendment, as requested in 2002, included designation of approximately 38.5 ae as RL-7, approximately 8.2 ac as OS-P, and approximately 3.3 ac as OS-C. The City later withdrew the IP portion of the LCP Amendment request to allow the LUP to be heard and approved first. The CCC recognized the withdrawal of the IP Amendment at its July 11,2007,hearing. 2.4.2 CCC-Suggested Modifications to the LUP Amendment CCC staff conducted a thorough evaluation of the City's LCP(later revised to LUP only)Amendment request, including consideration of alternative development scenarios for the Project site. At the May 2007 hearing in San Pedro, after presentations by staff and the applicant and public testimony, the CCC voted to deny the subject LUP Amendment, as submitted. A motion (i.e., the main motion) was made to approve the LUP Amendment with modifications, but, upon deliberation, the hearing was continued. The LUP Amendment was subsequently scheduled for CCC action at its hearing on July 9-13,2007. At the November 14, 2007, hearing, public testimony and CCC discussion included concerns regarding the extent of wetlands on site and the appropriate distance for Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) buffer areas. The CCC found that the area referred to as the Wintersburg Pond (WP)was not wet enough, long enough to develop a preponderance of wetland vegetation or wetland soils; that the area known as the EPA wetland was wet enough, long enough, to support a preponderance of wetland vegetation or soils in 1996, and that any changes in local hydrology that may have taken place since that time were unpermitted; that a variable-width buffer distance would be adequate to protect the eucalyptus grove ESHA; and that areas referred to as "intermingled areas" found between the areas identified as wetland, ESHA, and buffer areas should not be designated OS- PARKSIDE ESTATES 2-8 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH C. The CCC adopted revised findings on May 7, 2008 to support and explain their November 2007 action. The revised findings made clear that the CCC rejected the 4:1 mitigation ratio for impacts to the 4 ac EPA wetlands and focused on the land use designations as decided at the November 2007 hearing. Restoration of the EPA wetlands is included in the on-site restored wetlands complex,and no additional mitigation is required. The revised findings also clarify the buffer and other requirements of the LUP Amendment approval with suggested modifications. At its November 14,2007,hearing,the CCC approved the proposed LUP Amendment with suggested modifications as revised at that hearing. At the May 7, 2008, hearing, the CCC adopted the revised findings with changes to support its decision,including a finding under CEQA that its approval of the LUP Amendment as modified would not result in significant adverse environmental impacts within the meaning of CEQA. Table 2-1 provides a summary of the suggested modifications adopted by the CCC in 2008 and Exhibit 2-3 depicts the revised land use plan that incorporated these modifications. The changes made by the CCC include changes in the areas of the site to be designated OS-C and the areas to be designated as the development envelope (which allows either active park or residential development). The OS-P designation was removed, and the area designated OS-C (for conservation of open space) was increased as a result of the CCC's action. Therefore, the land use designations approved for the site by the CCC are RL and OS-C. In addition, the changes made by the CCC at the hearing resulted in changes to the suggested modification regarding the width of the ESHA buffer area and uses allowed within that buffer area. Also, there are changes to the wetlands fmdings supporting the CCC's determination that the WP area is not a wetland and to eliminate the discussion on the intermingled areas. Finally, changes are made in the ESHA findings to support the variable- width ESHA buffer rather than the 100-meter ESHA buffer, and to allow a portion of a water quality Natural Treatment System (NTS) as an allowable use within a wider portion of the outer ESHA variable buffer in the southerly area of the site, subject to restrictions. Appendix A of this AEIR contains the CCC-Adopted Findings and CCC Certification Letter. Changes to the Parkside Estates Project addressed in this Addendum include changes to the Project plans to reflect the CCC's suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment. The Project changes include: • A decrease in the number of residential units from 170 to 111 units; • Commensurate reduction in development area from 37.4 ac to 26.4 ac; • Increased protection of biological resources; • Reallocation of land uses (including development area, conservation area, and active and passive parks); • Provision of additional mechanical treatment of on-site and off-site storm water; • Implementation of a Natural Treatment System(NTS)for storm water treatment; • Expansion of the eucalyptus ESHA designation and creation of a variable ESHA buffer, which includes restricted public access; PARKSIDE ESTATES 2-9 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Table 2-1: Summary of CCC-Suggested Modifications Suggested Modification Summary 1. Updates subarea description LUP text updates reflect the California Coastal Commission(CCC) and Land Use Plan(LUP) action pertaining to the Project area. text 2. Modifies table titled Zone 2 The table updates reflect the CCC action pertaining to the Project to reflect the Parkside site land use designations,including the addition of an OS-C(Open Estates Project Space—Conservation)district and a Public district. 3. Change to figure in LUP Change to Figure C-6 in the LUP to reflect annexation and correct areas of certified land use designation. 4. Adds new figure to LUP New figure in LUP for the Parkside Estates site and the approved land use designation. 5. Adds a new subarea to Table The subarea addition to the table defines the characteristics and C-2 of the LUP design standards and principles,for the Parkside Estates subarea. Design standards and principles include a public access plan,a habitat management plan for all Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area(ESHA)wetland and buffer areas,archaeological research design,a water quality management program,a pest management plan, a landscape plan,a biological assessment,a wetland delineation,a domestic animal control plan,hazard mitigation,and a flood protection plan. 6. New LUP text regarding Describes the Parkside Estates site as a public vista point visual resources opportunity. 7. New text regarding Describes wetlands restoration opportunity areas and eucalyptus eucalyptus ESHA and trees on the site's southwestern boundary at the base of the bluff wetlands and in the northwest corner of the site as ESHA. Designates the ESHA and buffer areas as OS-C. 8. New LUP policy Ties phasing of public access and recreation benefits to private development. 9. New LUP policy New residential streets between the sea and the first public road will be open to the public,and general public parking will be provided. 10. New and modified LUP Specifies requirements pertaining to Treatment and Source Control water and marine resources Best Management Practices(BMPs). policies 11. New LUP policy Clarifies that areas constituting wetlands or ESHAs that were converted without CCC approval are protected. PARKSIDE ESTATES 2-10 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH • Creation of a restored wetlands complex that includes the modified 4 ac restored EPA wetlands, the Agricultural Pond or "AP" wetland, and associated wetlands buffer (which overlaps the eucalyptus buffer in some areas); • Inclusion of a Vegetated Flood Protection Feature (VFPF) to provide flood control protection (substituting for the sea wall as considered in the Final EIR); and • A reduction in the amount of imported fill from approximately 270,000 cy to approximately 225,000 cy. The City Council accepted the suggested modifications and updated the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan for the Parkside Estates Project in June 2008. In August 2008, the CCC approved the Executive Director's determination (EDD) that the action of the City accepting certification of Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan (LCP) Amendment No. 1-06 with suggested modifications was legally adequate. The corollary changes to the Project plans are addressed in this CEQA Addendum. 2.5 COMPARISON OF PROJECT (2002 VERSUS 2008) The Parkside Estates 2002 City-approved land use plan and Tentative Tract Maps have been revised to incorporate the CCC's suggested modifications adopted by the City in June 2008. The revised land use plan and TTM are shown in Exhibits 2-3 and 2-5 respectively and follow the original City- approved plans (Exhibits 2-2 and 2-4) for easy comparison. Corollary changes to the originally approved CUP, CDP (in concept), GPA, and Zoning Code have also been proposed. As indicated in Table 1-1, there is a 59-unit reduction in the proposed units and a 19.4 acre increase in the amount of land that would be designated for conservation uses. Table 1-1: Land Use Comparison 2002 Project Revised Pro'ect Difference Land Use Acres Units Acres Units Acres I Units (net) (net) (net) Residential RL 37.4 170 26.4 111 -11 -59 Open Space—Park OS-P 8.4 n/a n/a n/a -8.4 n/a Open Space — Conservation 3.7 n/a 23.1 n/a +19.4 n/a (OS-C) Total 49.5 170 49.5 111 0 -59 Source:Hunsaker(2008). PARKSIDE ESTATES 2-11 ADDENDUM EIR c,aaa mr ny ° •-41 7 { t i t " r Y &+....m _ .. �` w��•'�.;�"f' S� � k� r�� �`�,�#'` � y ��•�^ uan�ucscrswxrort a e�" r � �� ' "`�"� ��u x � a� ��,. � �� l,�•. i'. 5 � ��.����E� sTareea.Fir of<aww.msna � ��: vEcwrY rear,.. - �, OP SheaHomes t sr 33 ,.. C ,f _- ,� ' � �.. l � � d"�. 3 ���:� 4✓j E � � PARfiR!'D TOq mx_ µ COMBINED-REVISED a.,.,,. ^ s € ,, NO .15977 815419NTATIVE TRACT GS Dem Or LOT O OVAN,Of WEST LOT'..LM 19TALL.OF 4e"r STATK;� NON ANNE� 'r <AATWN AC.TEWNAT7YE LAYBUT -R''`S" 'DeDLDTd DF it rstip pq3 FLN1NRYkV} ( EXHIBIT 2-4 7 vn t;ity-App i3uerfi--2002 Parksidt-.Estates Tentative Tract Maps, — _. ........... _........................................................._....._........._...._.__..............._..�- _. ^ TRACT 1J _ •v .. o 53 '�a4 f _ .Yf711 Y N(7 t�r�e' kff f r Al "5 a� j 1J vim,. 4 a43 'A � �,• „� r *r Ott NOTES nk a r`• \-„txi TYPICAL STREET 9E6TlAMS LEGAL AMCRMTION LOT SL0.NdARY.7Ad.E 7 k ...., ;t S�• :VICWTY MAP LAND USE SfA{>i♦IARY �m c ^Ylrr� Lilt .n _ r• S ., x COMBINED ` TENTATIVE tRACT MAPS NO.>153TT 8 15319� EXHIBIT 2-5' tv z+c RfYISC .nf', ' e Tmo Maps to Reflect the 2008 CC t Suggested Modif rations': „siL " MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2.6 PROJECT COMMITMENTS The revised Project plans (see Exhibits 2-3 and 2-5 and revised application package on file at the City of Huntington Beach) reflect and incorporate the suggested modifications by the CCC, described above. The revised Project plans also incorporate additional Project features to reduce project-related energy and water consumption, reduce waste generation, and promote use of renewable resources, as requested by City staff and committed to by the applicant. These voluntary commitments are identified in the Sustainability Program appended to this document (Appendix C). The elements identified in the Sustainability Program go beyond the requirements of the Certified EIR Air Quality Mitigation Plan and are supplemented by additional commitments to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as listed below. • Project Commitment—Construction.Prior to the issuance of building permits: o The Project plans and specifications shall include a statement that construction equipment shall be shut off when not in use and shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. o The Project plans and specifications shall include a statement that queuing of trucks on and off site shall be limited to periods when absolutely necessitated by grading or construction activities. o The Project plans and specifications shall include a statement that, to the extent feasible, all diesel- and gasoline-powered construction equipment shall be replaced with equivalent electric equipment. o The Project plans and specifications shall include policies and procedures for the reuse and recycling of construction and demolition waste(including,but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete,lumber,metal,and cardboard). o The Project plans and specifications shall include education for construction workers about reducing waste and available recycling services. • Project Commitment—Operation.Prior to the issuance of building permits: o The applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures exceeds current(2008)Title 24 requirements. o The applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures incorporates basic or enhanced insulation such that heat transfer and thermal bridging are minimized. (See also the Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) component of the Sustainability Program,Appendix C.) o Air leakage through the structures or within the heating and cooling distribution systems shall be limited to minimize energy consumption. (See also the HVAC component of the Sustainability Program,Appendix C.) o The applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures incorporates Energy Star-rated windows or better. (See also the Windows component of the Sustainability Program,Appendix C.) o The applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures incorporates Energy Star-rated space heating and cooling equipment or better. (See also the Appliances/Fixtures component of the Sustainability Program,Appendix C.) o The applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures incorporates Energy Star-rated light fixtures or better. (See also the Appliances/Fixtures component of the Sustainability Program,Appendix C.) o The applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures includes consideration instal lation/operation of renewable electric generation systems. (See also the Potential Option component of the Sustainability Program,Appendix C.) PARKS/DE ESTATES ' 2-14 ADDENDUM E/R MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH o The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed building or structure designs incorporate energy-efficient hot water systems. (See also the Plumbing and Potential Option components of the Sustainability Program,Appendix C.) o The applicant shall demonstrate that the landscape plan for the proposed buildings or structures incorporates water-efficient irrigation systems and devices, such as soil moisture- based irrigation controls or irrigation controls that account for actual weather conditions. (See also the Site and Consumer Education components of the Sustainability Program, Appendix C.) o The applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed buildings or structures includes measures to be water-efficient, such as water-efficient fixtures and appliances. (See also the Plumbing component of the Sustainability Program,Appendix C.) o The applicant shall demonstrate that all interior building lighting supports the use of compact fluorescent light bulbs or equivalently efficient lighting. (See also the Appliances/Fixtures component of the Sustainability Program,Appendix C.) PARKSIDE ESTATES 2-15 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 3.0 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A comparative analysis has been undertaken pursuant to provisions of CEQA to provide City decision-makers with a factual basis for determining whether changes in the Project, changes in circumstances, or new information since Final EIR No. 97-2 was certified require additional environmental review or preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR.The basis for each finding is explained in the analyses that follow. Areas of potential environmental effect as a result of the Project, as identified in the Initial Study and addressed in EIR No. 97-2,are: • Land Use Compatibility • Aesthetics/Light and Glare • Transportation/Circulation ® Air Quality • Noise • Earth Resources • Drainage/Hydrology • Biological Resources • Cultural and Paleontological Resources • Public Services and Utilities This Addendum compares anticipated environmental effects of the revised Project as modified by CCC action with those identified in EIR No. 97-2 to review whether any conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR are met. The Addendum also discusses the status and the applicability of the certified EIR Mitigation Measures. Mitigation measures that have been met and/or are no longer applicable to the revised Project are shown in italics print within the following sections as well as in the Mitigation Monitoring Program in Appendix B. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3.1 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE 3.1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3.1.1 Existing Environmental Setting Please see Section 5.1 of certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 for a detailed discussion of the existing environmental setting for land use. The Project site is an approximately 50 ac parcel of vacant, primarily agricultural land that is mostly devoid of native vegetation and located between the Wintersburg Flood Control Channel on the south, Graham Street to the east, and residential development to the north. The land west of the site is vacant and commonly known as the Bolsa Chica Mesa. Final EIR No. 97-2 presented and analyzed the proposed Project site development in the context of the City General Plan, Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, and Bolsa Chica LCP goals. The CCC findings state that the approximately 50 ac site is located in close proximity to the Bolsa Chica Wetlands restoration area. The Bolsa Chica Wetlands, at approximately 1,000 ac, is the largest remaining wetland in Southern California. Because it is tidally influenced,the Bolsa Chica Wetlands constitute "sea" according to the Coastal Act definition (Section 30115). Because there is no public road between the subject site and the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, the site is between the sea and the first public road. As such, the area is given special significance under the Coastal Act with regard to the requirement for the provision of public access.Further,the Coastal Act gives priority to land uses that provide opportunities for enhanced public access, public recreation, and lower-cost visitor recreational uses. Beyond the Bolsa Chica Wetlands restoration area is the Pacific Ocean and its sandy public beaches. Thus, public access across the subject site to the Bolsa Chica area would, in turn, facilitate public access,via alternate means of transportation(bicycle and pedestrian),to the ocean and beach beyond. The visitor-serving uses available within the Bolsa Chica Reserve (such as walking, nature study, or bird watching) are served by only two small parking areas. One is located at the Interpretive Center at the corner of Warner Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway and the second at about the midway point along the Reserve's Pacific Coast Highway frontage. There is no public parking available along Pacific Coast Highway adjacent to the Reserve; thus, the benefits of providing alternate forms of transportation to access the area (such as biking or hiking from inland areas) are substantially increased. The lack of adequate parking to serve the Reserve area is also a limiting factor in maximizing public use of the Reserve's amenities. Providing public parking on public streets in the Parkside Estates Project and ensuring that any future streets within the subject site are open to the public will maximize public access in the area. The Brightwater residential development, approved by the CCC under CDP No. 5-05-020 (Brightwater), is located less than 0.5 mile west of the subject site. That development was originally proposed as a private, guard-gated community. However, as approved by the CCC, the development is open to general public vehicular and pedestrian access and allows public parking on all subdivision streets. Also, as approved by the CCC, the development includes a public trail along the bluff edge of the development, with public paseos and pocket parks throughout. The CCC's approval also required public access signage(CCC Adopted Findings,pp. 52-53,Appendix A). PARKS/DE ESTATES 3.2 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE 3.1.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts Please see Section 5.1 of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for analyses of the potential effects of the Parkside Estates Project to land use. The Final EIR concluded that there would be no impacts related to the on-site residential land use relationship, and that there would be no impacts related to on-site land use relationships between the proposed park and proposed residential uses. In addition,the Final EIR stated that establishment of new residential land use relationships with adjacent land uses would not result in significant impacts. There would be no impacts to land use relationships between the proposed park and existing off-site residential uses. Furthermore, the Final EIR concluded that the proposed Project would not result in impacts to the Land Use,Urban Design,Housing,Historic and Cultural Resources,Economic Development,Growth Management, Circulation, Public Services, Recreation and Community Services, Utilities, Environmental Resources/Conservation, Air Quality, Coastal, Environmental Hazards, Noise, and Hazardous Materials Elements of the City General Plan. The proposed Project evaluated in the Final EIR included amendments to the Coastal and Land Use Elements of the General Plan. The Final EIR also concluded that the Project would not result in project-specific or cumulative impacts to the LUP and Bolsa Chica LCP. Final EIR No. 97-2 concluded that the Project may result in significant impacts related to the provision of affordable housing and cumulative impacts related to inconsistencies with the City Affordable Housing Policy. Mitigation Measure 1 requires that 10 percent of the proposed housing units be affordable. A listing of the Certified EIR mitigation measures and their applicability to the revised Project are included in Section 3.1.5 and in the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in Appendix B. 3.1.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis Changes to the Parkside Estates Project addressed in this Addendum include changes to the Project plans to reflect the CCC's suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment. Final EIR No. 97-2 was approved in 2002. Between 2003 and 2008,the applicant was engaged in additional studies,meetings with City and CCC staff, and several CCC hearings. As a result of all these efforts, including the CCC's Suggested Modifications to the LUP Amendment, the following key changes to the Project, relevant to Land Use Compatibility have been made: • A decrease in the number of residential units from 170 to I I I units; • Commensurate reduction in development footprint from 37.4 ac to 26.4 ac; • Increased protection of biological resources; • Reallocation of land uses (including development area, conservation area, and active and passive parks); • The area designated for OS-C increased from 3.7 ac to 23.1 ac (including a 0.6 ac passive park). • The area designated for an active/passive park will be decreased from 8.4 ac to 1.6 ac (a 1.0 ac active park in RL and 0.6 ac in OS-C). • Implementation of an NTS for storm water treatment. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-3 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE Please see Section 2.0 of this addendum document for more information regarding the Project changes. The major land use effect of these key changes is a net increase in conservation of open space and a net decrease in development footprint. Other changes to the Project site plan, including modifications approved by the CCC,that may affect land use compatibility include changes to the site plan(e.g.,the reduced number of residential units, the reduced development footprint and increased area dedicated to open space, and the introduction of specific open space uses, including the NTS, the VFPF, and increased conservation area). The increased area dedicated to natural open space is consistent with residential uses; therefore, there are minimal changes to the Final EIR conclusions regarding on-site land use relationships between the proposed park/open space and proposed residential uses. The active recreation/park area has been reduced, and the natural, conservation open space area is larger. The number of dwelling units has also been reduced by approximately 59 units or 35 percent. The total area dedicated to open space (including OS-C, OS-P, and wetlands) increased from approximately 12 ac to approximately 23 ac (Table 1-1). The proposed Project changes include parallel modifications to the Land Use and Coastal Element amendments; therefore, the changes do not change the conclusion with regard to Project consistency with the City's General Plan. The increased area dedicated to natural open space, preservation and creation of wetlands, and dual mechanical and natural treatment of storm water before it is discharged to the ocean are all Project modifications that are intended to enhance the natural coastal environment, and are therefore consistent with the Bolsa Chica LCP. The CCC findings state that the LUP Amendment, as proposed and amended, will provide a Class I bicycle path, a public view area, a public park area, and interior trails as well as public parking along the residential streets. Such uses constitute lower-cost,visitor-serving recreational uses. As modified, the recreational and public access provisions will be constructed prior to or concurrent with the residential uses. Therefore, the CCC found that the proposed LUP Amendment is consistent with the sections of the Coastal Act pertaining to visitor-serving commercial recreational facilities that encourage provision of lower-cost public recreational facilities (CCC Adopted Findings, p. 62, Appendix A). The revised subdivision is similar to the 2002 approved Project, but a substantial part of the western portion of the subdivision has been eliminated and the density has been reduced from 170 units to 111 units. The allowable uses in the park will not be intensified compared to the approved 2002 Project. The buffers approved by the CCC for the separation of the RL and OS-C uses have been increased in some areas compared with the buffers included in Final EIR No. 97-2 for the former County portion of the site. Therefore, there are no changes in regard to Final EIR conclusions that there would not be project-specific or cumulative impacts to the land use compatibility nor the City General Plan and Bolsa Chica LCP. As stated in Section 3.1.2, the Final EIR included Mitigation Measure 1 to ensure compliance with the City's affordable housing policy. The mitigation measure requires the applicant to satisfy the City's policy which is based on a requirement that 10 percent of the proposed units be affordable,and allows policy compliance through a variety of methods, including payment of fees. The revised Project includes fewer units; therefore,the applicant's obligation to affordable housing in the City has been commensurately reduced. The applicant has already satisfied the requirement through the acquisition of off-site affordable units. Thus, the requirements of Mitigation Measure 1 have been PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-4 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE satisfied, and there is no change in the conclusion of the Final EIR that this impact is reduced to below a level of significance with implementation of mitigation. 3.1.4 Cumulative Impacts Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that Project changes would result in more substantial or new significant cumulative impacts to land use compatibility than those cumulative impacts identified and analyzed in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. 3.1.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures Based on the analysis above, the land use compatibility impacts of the 2008 Project revisions would remain the same or be reduced from those identified in the Certified Final EIR. However, the standard City policies and requirements identified in the Final EIR would still apply to the revised Project. Mitigation Measure 1 of the Final EIR has been satisfied by the Project applicant and is therefore no longer applicable. It is shown in italics below. 1. Prior to recordation of a final tract map, the applicant must satisfy the City's policy requiring 10 percent of proposed units to be affordable. This requirement must be satisfied to the discretion of the City Department of Planning through one of the following methods: A. Pay a fee to the City if such a process is available; B. Participate with other developers or a nonprofit organization to acquire and/or rehabilitate existing apartment units at any off-site location within a suitable area and provide for continued affordability; or C. Provide the required affordable units at one of Shea Homes'future multifamily projects within the City of Huntington Beach. 3.1.6 Conclusion The comparison of anticipated environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Parkside Estates 2002 Project with the land use impacts identified in the previously certified Final EIR supports the required CEQA findings below. Specifically,none of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met. Y The revised Project would not result in new significant environmental impacts to land use compatibility, nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to land use compatibility from that described in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates there are substantial changes in circumstances pertaining to land use compatibility that would require major changes to the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. 9 There is no substantial new information that there would be a new significant impact to land use compatibility requiring major revisions of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There are no alternatives to the Project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts pertaining to land use compatibility identified in and considered by the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-5 ADDENDUM Ell? MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE 3.2 AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE 3.2.1 Existing Environmental Setting Visual Character Please see Section 5.2 of certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for a detailed discussion of the existing environmental setting for visual resources. Visual resources on the Project site include several eucalyptus trees located in the northwestern portion of the Project site and one stand in the southwestern portion of the site. The CCC Findings state that the subject site offers the opportunity to provide public views from the site to the Bolsa Chica Wetlands area and toward the ocean beyond. Trails and Corridors The Project is unfenced private property. Currently, and at the time the EIR was prepared and certified, some pedestrians choose to walk across the site. As stated in the Final EIR, a planned scenic route would run north-south along Bolsa Chica Street. In addition, Bolsa Chica Street is proposed to have a Class II bicycle lane. The Final EIR also refers to the LCP, which identifies an interpretive trail with limited access to be located along the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel, south of the site, and a proposed Class I bicycle and hiking trail to be located adjacent to the interpretive trail. Light and Glare According to the Final EIR, the existing site is vacant and does not generate light and glare; however, nighttime illumination is generated by the adjacent street lights and associated vehicular lights as well as the surrounding residential land uses. 3.2.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts Visual Character Please see Section 5.2 of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for analyses of the potential effects of the Parkside Estates Project to visual resources. The Final EIR concluded that no sensitive visual resources exist on the Project site, and that the Project would not affect any existing or proposed City scenic routes. First, the Final EIR concluded that the proposed Project may result in a significant visual impact due to the reduction of viewable open space areas. Some members of the community may perceive this change as a negative aesthetic effect. The Final EIR includes Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 to require incorporation of City comments on the final design and layout of the buildings and approval of the landscaping plans. Mitigation Measure 3 requiring the replacement of mature trees was included in the Final EIR for the original Project's impacts to removal of on-site eucalyptus trees. The 2002 City-approved Project (Alternative 7) did not include eucalyptus tree removal and therefore, Mitigation Measure 3 did not apply to the 2002 City-approved Project. PARKS/DE ESTATES 3-6 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE Trails and Corridors The Project as approved at the time the Final EIR was certified included a public park in the northwest portion of the site.No designated trails were included in the park;however,the presence of a publicly accessible park would have allowed continued pedestrian use by the public across a portion of the site. The Final EIR concluded that the proposed Project may result in significant impacts to County- proposed trails. Class II bicycle lane is proposed by others to run north-south along Bolsa Chica Street; an interpretive trail is proposed to be located along the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel, south of the site; and a proposed Class I bicycle and hiking trail is proposed adjacent to the interpretive trail. Final EIR No. 97-2 includes Mitigation Measure 4 that requires approval of consistency of the proposed bikeway plan with the Orange County Bikeway Plan. Light and Glare The Final EIR determined that the proposed Project may result in significant impacts due to the increase of light and glare generated on site from vehicles. The proposed Project is expected to result in impacts to the surrounding residential development primarily to the north and to some extent to the east,as well as significant light and glare impacts to the off-site uses. Final EIR No. 97-2 incorporates Mitigation Measures 1-3 (related to glare) that require approval of the plan consistent with standards for roadway lightening,prevention of light spillage onto adjacent properties, and use of nonreflective materials. A listing of the Certified EIR mitigation measures related to aesthetics/light and glare and their applicability to the revised Project are included in Section 3.2.5 and in the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program(MMRP) in Appendix B. 3.2.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis Changes to the Parkside Estates Project addressed in this Addendum include changes to the Project plans to reflect the CCC's suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment. The Project changes related to Aesthetics/Light and Glare include: • A decrease in the number of residential units from 170 to I I I units; • A commensurate reduction in development area from 37.4 ac to 26.4 ac; • Increased protection of biological resources; • Reallocation of land uses (including development area, conservation area, and active and passive parks); • Expansion of the eucalyptus ESHA designation and creation of a variable buffer, which includes restricted public access; • Creation of a restored wetlands complex that includes the modified 4 ac restored EPA wetlands, the AP wetland, and associated wetlands buffer (which overlaps the eucalyptus buffer in some areas); • Inclusion of a VFPF to provide flood control protection (substituting for the sea wall as considered in the Final EIR); and Please see Section 2.0 of this addendum document for more information regarding the Project changes. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3.7 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE Visual Character The changes to the Project, including modifications approved by the CCC, that may affect the Final EIR conclusion regarding aesthetics include the reduced number of residential units, the reduced development footprint and increased area dedicated to open space, and the introduction of specific open space uses, including the NTS and increased conservation area. The revised Project includes additional buffer protection for the existing northwest grove of eucalyptus trees. The natural areas on the site will be planted with native species, and overall, the reduced development footprint and increased area of natural open space is considered to have a positive effect on the visual environment and does not change the conclusions of the Final EIR. The Final EIR identifies impacts as a result of a reduction of viewable open space areas as a potentially significant impact. Original Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 are still applicable to the revised Project and require incorporation of City comments and conditions in the site design plans and final landscape plans that include landscaping on the outside of the perimeter wall for the Project. The CCC findings state that the VFPF would provide an excellent opportunity to provide public views to and along the coast and scenic areas (CCC Adopted Findings, p. 57, Appendix A). The LUP Amendment text identifies the Project site as a vista point with public views toward the Bolsa Chica Wetlands and the Pacific Ocean. A public vista location is included in the revised Project as reflected in the revised TTMs (see Figure 2-5). The proposed Project changes result in an increase in the area preserved as open space compared with the Project as analyzed in Final EIR No. 97-2, and therefore a reduced impact with regard to changes to viewable open space compared with the Project as evaluated in the Final EIR. Trails/Corridors As stated above, there are no existing designated trails currently transecting the Project site, and the Project as approved in 2002 did not include any designated trails transecting the site. The CCC designation of the 2002 Project public park area as ESHA requires certain protections and restrictions of the natural resources in this area. Therefore,the CCC ESHA designation and accompanying access restrictions for the conservation areas do not represent substantial changes in circumstances nor result in new significant impacts. 4 The CCC-suggested modifications included changes to the language of the LUP Amendment to further ensure and enhance the Project's public access and coastal recreation value. These changes include: • Bicycle path along the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel adjacent to the site development; • Public (ungated) streets and parking within the proposed residential area; • Phased implementation of recreation and public access benefits;and • Interior trail connections between Graham Street, future public park areas, and the bicycle path. These features have been incorporated into the revised Project plans. Improvements to the existing trail along the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel are included in the revised Project. The Parkside Estates Project also includes internal public trails and sidewalks that connect to the channel levee trail. A trail contemplated along the north property line has been found to be PARKSIDE ESTATES 3.8 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE infeasible due to the grade differential along the north property line and the ESHA protection requirements. Overall, the Project changes, including the CCC ESHA designation and the effect of ESHA protection requirements on pedestrian access, are balanced by the availability of public streets (rather than private streets with gate control) and the implementation of on-site trails and sidewalks combined with improvements to the channel levee trail. Suggested Modification No. 9 stipulates that roadways are public streets. Therefore,the Project street system will be available to the public, and any views from those streets would be enjoyed by the public. There is no change to the trail system associated with the Project; an interpretive trail is proposed to be located along the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel, south of the site, and a Class I bicycle and hiking trail is proposed adjacent to the interpretive trail. The suggested modifications include, and the CCC findings reference incorporation of, open fencing/wall, landscaped screening, use of an undulating or offset wall footprint, or decorative wall features (such as artistic imprints,etc.), or a combination of these measures for the bicycle path along the top of the levee. Final FIR No. 97-2 Mitigation Measure 4, which requires approval of consistency of the proposed bikeway plan with the Orange County Bikeway Plan, will continue to apply to the revised Project. Light and Glare With implementation of the revised Project features, Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 (under glare), Suggested Modifications Nos. 6 and 9 (see Section 2.5), and the overall reduction in the Project development footprint and increase in the natural open space on the site,the light and glare impacts of the revised Project are consistent with and reduced compared to those identified in the Final FIR. 3.2.4 Cumulative Impacts Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that Project changes would result in more substantial or new significant cumulative aesthetic impacts than those cumulative impacts identified and analyzed in the certified Final FIR No. 97-2. 3.2.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures Based on the analysis above, Project revisions would remain the same or be reduced from those identified in the Certified FIR. However,the standard City policies and requirements identified in the Final FIR would still apply to the revised Project. Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 (under Aesthetics) and Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 (under Light and Glare) listed below would still apply. However, Mitigation Measure 3 (under Aesthetics) is not applicable to the revised Project as no mature trees will be removed,and therefore,this Mitigation Measure is shown in italics below. Aesthetics 1. Prior to approval of building permits, the applicant shall provide proof of incorporation of City comments/conditions related to the overall proposed design and layout of buildings, and landscaping. The design and layout of buildings shall be approved by the City Department of Planning. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3.9 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a landscaping plan for the area outside the perimeter wall along Graham Street to be reviewed and approved by the City Department of Planning. 3. Prior to approval of building permits, the applicant shall provide a Landscape Plan to be approved by the Department of Public Works and the Department of Planning, which includes the replacement of all mature trees on the site at a 2:1 ratio with 36-inch box trees. 4. Prior to approval of building permits, the applicant shall submit a bikeways plan to the City of Huntington Beach Planning Division Department in consultation with the Manager of the County PFRD/HBP Program Management and coordination, for approval of consistency with the Orange County Bikeway Plan. Light and Glare 1. Prior to the approval of building permits, the applicant shall prepare a plan that shows the proposed height, location, and intensity of street lights on site. The plan shall comply with minimum standards for roadway lighting, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planning and Public Works Department. 2. Prior to the approval of building permits, if outdoor lighting is to be included, energy saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent"spillage"onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. 3. Nonreflective materials shall be utilized to the extent feasible. Individual building site plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planning and Public Works Department. 3.2.6 Conclusion The comparison of anticipated environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Parkside Estates 2002 Project with the aesthetics/light and glare impacts identified in the previously certified Final FIR supports the required CEQA findings below. Specifically, none of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met. o The revised Project would not result in new significant environmental impacts to aesthetics/light and glare, nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to aesthetics/light and glare from that described in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates there are substantial changes in circumstances pertaining to aesthetics/light and glare that would require major changes to the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no substantial new information that there would be a new significant impact to aesthetics/light and glare requiring major revisions of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. S There are no alternatives to the Project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts pertaining to aesthetics/light and glare identified in and considered by the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-10 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION 3.3 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION 3.3.1 Existing Environmental Setting Please see Section 5.3 of certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for a detailed discussion of the existing environmental setting for traffic and circulation patterns. Appendix B of Final EIR No. 97-2 includes the Traffic Study for the Graham Street Residential Development. The site is currently cultivated and therefore does not generate traffic other than occasional farming-related trips. The primary regional access to the site is from the Interstate 405 (I-405), whereas the primary local west-east access is from Warner Avenue, with north-south access from Graham Street. As stated in the Final EIR, the City has determined that level of service (LOS) C or better is the acceptable standard for roadway links,whereas LOS D or better is the acceptable standard for intersections. The Final EIR analyzed six study area intersections (Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue, Greenleaf Lane/ Warner Avenue, Graham Street/Wamer Avenue, Springdale/Warner Avenue, Graham Street/ Glenstone, and Graham Street/Slater Avenue), and several roadway segments along Warner Avenue and Graham Street. The analysis of existing intersection LOS determined that all intersections currently operate at LOS C or better for both peak periods with existing traffic volumes. Because the Project proposes an additional access from Graham Street, a signal warrant analysis/traffic signalization analysis was performed. 3.3.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts Please see Section 5.3 of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for analyses of the potential effects of the Parkside Estates Project to transportation and circulation. The Final EIR concluded that the Project would not result in adverse project-specific impacts related to vehicular traffic increases at the modeled intersections and roadway segments under the existing plus Project conditions and under short-tern cumulative conditions. In addition, the Final EIR determined that the Project would not result in significant impacts related to parking. The Final EIR concluded that the proposed Project may result in significant short-term, construction- related impacts due to the addition of truck and construction traffic vehicles. Final EIR No. 97-2 incorporates Mitigation Measure 1, which requires implementation of a truck and construction vehicles rerouting plan. In addition, the Final EIR determined that the proposed Project may result in significant impacts to pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular safety related to the establishment of access and an on-site circulation system. Final EIR No. 97-2 incorporates Mitigation Measures 2-4, which require: (a)construction of a traffic signal light and improvement of the proposed "A" Street/Graham Street intersection, (b)incorporation of the pedestrian/bicycle safety standards, and (c)restriping of Graham Street. Ultimately, the Final EIR concluded that the proposed Project, in conjunction with other past,present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will result in LOS deficiencies at the intersections of Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and Graham Street/Warner Avenue under the 2020 condition, and therefore would have a significant impact related to LOS before mitigation. Five mitigation measures are included in the Final EIR to address impacts to transportation and circulation, including construction traffic routing, a new traffic signal at proposed "A" Street and Graham Street,pedestrian and bicycle improvements, and restriping Graham Street. Final Mitigation Measure 5 requires the PARKSIDE ESTATES 3.1 1 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION applicant to pay fair-share fees that would cover 2020 improvements at those two impacted intersections. A listing of the Certified EIR mitigation measures related to transportation/circulation and their applicability to the revised Project are included in Section 3.3.5 and in the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program(MMRP)in Appendix B. 3.3.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis Changes to the Parkside Estates Project addressed in this Addendum include changes to the Project plans to reflect the CCC's suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment. The Project changes related to Transportation/Circulation include: • A decrease in the number of residential units from 170 to I I I units; • A decrease in active/passive park from 8.4 acres to 1.6 acres(a 1.0-acre active park in RL and a 0.6-acre in OS-C) • A reduction in the amount of imported fill from approximately 270,000 cy to approximately 225,000 cy. Please see Section 2.0 of this Addendum FIR document for more information regarding the Project changes. The changes to. the Project, including modifications approved by the CCC, that may affect transportation and circulation include the reduced number of dwelling units, reduced park site, and reduced quantity of fill required to regrade the site. The revised Project has 59 fewer units compared to the Project approved based on the Final EIR. The approximately 35 percent reduction in units will result in a commensurate decrease in the number of vehicular trips generated by the Project. Specifically, average daily traffic (ADT) would drop from 2,040 trips per day to 1,332 trips per day with the revised Project, and a.m. peak-hour trips would drop from 163 to 107, and p.m. peak-hour trips would change from 204 to 133 (see Table 3-1). Table 3-1: Summary of Trip Generation Rate Comparisons' AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Density ADT In Out Total In Out Total 2002 Single-Family 170 2,040 49 114 163 143 61 204 (Alternative 7 2008 Sin le-Famil I I I 1,33L_L 32 75 107 93 40 133 Rates per San Diego Association of Governments(SANDAG)Traffic Generation Daily trips per unit: 12 AM Peak:8%of daily split 30:70(inbound:outbound) PM Peak: 10%of daily split 70:30(inbound:outbound) ADT=average daily traffic Despite the reduction in traffic resulting from the Project, the traffic and circulation Mitigation Measures 1 through 4 included in the Final EIR remain applicable to the revised Project. These mitigation measures include a construction traffic routing plan,physical traffic safety improvements such as installation of a traffic signal, incorporation of pedestrian/bicycle safety standards, and restriping Graham Street to include vehicular and bicycle lanes. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3.12 ADDEND UM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION The reduction in the number of dwelling units and reduced quantity of imported fill needed to regrade the site will result in a reduction in construction trips, particularly haul trips for fill and construction materials. However,Mitigation Measure 1 requiring a construction traffic routing plan is still required for the revised Project. Suggested CCC Modification No. 5 requires the following: (a) a Public Access Plan be developed for the Project, including the provision of a Class I Bikeway along the north levee of the flood control channel; (b)provision of a public vista point; (c) all streets be public; (d)provision of public access trails to the Class I Bikeway; (e) other public open space and Class I trails; (f)public access signage; and (g)visual treatment of privacy walls. These provisions in Suggested Modification No. 5 are consistent with, and build upon,Mitigation Measures 3 and 4,which addresses pedestrian and bicycle safety along the Project perimeter. In addition,Mitigation Measure 5 also remains applicable and requires the payment of fair-share fees for improvements to two intersections on Warner Avenue to offset contributions to cumulative effects at those intersections. 3.3.4 Cumulative Impacts Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that Project changes would result in more substantial or new significant cumulative impacts to transportation and circulation than those cumulative impacts identified and analyzed in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. 3.3.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures Based on the analysis above, the traffic/circulation impacts from the 2008 Project revisions would remain the same or be reduced from those identified in the Certified EIR. However,the standard City policies and requirements identified in the Final EIR would still apply to the revised Project. Mitigation Measures 1 through 5 listed below would still apply to the Project. 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall coordinate with the City of Huntington Beach in developing a truck and construction vehicle routing plan (including dirt import haul route). This plan shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to minimize construction-related impacts to adjacent residents. The final plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. 2. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall construct a traffic signal and improve the intersection at the proposed"A"Street and Graham Street. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer that standards (including Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA]) regarding pedestrian/bicycle safety along the perimeter sidewalks will be met. 4. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall be responsible for restriping Graham Street from Glenstone to the Project access("A" Street)as follows: • Two 7-foot bike lanes; one 12-foot through lane in each direction; and a 14-foot two- way,left-turning median. PARKSME ESTATES 3-13 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Additionally, the applicant shall be responsible for restriping Graham Street from "A" Street to Warner Avenue,as follows: • Two 7-foot bike lanes; one 18-foot through lane in each direction; and a 14-foot two- way, left-turning median. 5. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall participate in the applicable Traffic Impact Fees (TIF) for the City of Huntington Beach. The actual allocation shall be approved by the City. Appropriate credits shall be granted toward the TIF. The TIF shall cover the Project's fair share of year 2020 improvements to the arterial street system as follows: • Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue—reconfigure intersection for east/west traffic to provide dual left turns and either three through lanes or an exclusive right-turn lane. The deficiency is a product of cumulative growth and not a direct result of the proposed Project. • Graham Street/Warner Avenue — reconfigure intersection to provide an exclusive southbound right-turn lane from Graham Street to Warner Avenue. This deficiency is a product of cumulative growth and not a direct result of the proposed Project. 3.3.6 Conclusion The comparison of anticipated environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Parkside Estates 2002 Project with the transportation/circulation impacts identified in the previously certified Final EIR supports the required CEQA findings below. Specifically, none of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met. • The revised Project would not result in new significant environmental impacts to transportation/circulation, nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to aesthetics/light and glare from that described in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no infonnation in the record or otherwise available that indicates there are substantial changes in circumstances pertaining to transportation/circulation that would require major changes to the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no substantial new information that there would be a new significant impact to transportation/circulation requiring major revisions of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There are no alternatives to the Project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts pertaining to transportation/circulation identified in and considered by the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. PARKS/DE ESTATES 3-14 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AIR QUALITY 3.4 AIR QUALITY 3.4.1 Existing Environmental Setting Please see Section 5.4 of certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for a detailed discussion of the existing environmental setting for air quality. Appendix D of Final EIR No. 97-2 includes the assumptions and air quality calculations for the Parkside Estates Project. The site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) and therefore is under jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the California Air Resources Board (ARB). The Final EIR states that at the time the Basin was designated as a nonattainment area for ozone, carbon monoxide,nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter less than 10 microns in size (PM,o) by the EPA and ARB. Sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfate, and lead concentrations were below the State and federal standards. Subsequent to the adoption of the Final EIR, the Basin attained compliance with all carbon monoxide standards and the Basin has been re-designated as"attainment" for this pollutant. The site is currently cultivated, does not generate traffic other than occasional farming-related trips, and is assumed to generate negligible mobile and stationary source air emissions. 3.4.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts Please see Section 5.4 of the certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 for analyses of the potential effects of the Parkside Estates Project to air quality. The Final EIR concluded that the Project may result in significant impacts with respect to exceeding SCAQMD's daily threshold emissions levels for nitrogen oxides (NO,,) during construction activities. The addition of emissions to the Basin is considered a significant impact under CEQA. The Final EIR incorporates Mitigation Measures 1 through 6,which require use of BMPs during the grading and construction. Final EIR No. 97-2 determined that the Project, in conjunction with the past,present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would result in short-term air quality impacts due to construction activities. The Final EIR includes Mitigation Measures 1 through 6,which necessitate implementation of BMPs during grading and construction activities. Final EIR No. 97-2 concluded that the Project, in conjunction with the past,present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would incrementally contribute to emissions to the Basin, which is designated as nonattainment. The Final EIR incorporates Mitigation Measures 7 and 8, which require a proof of contribution of fair-share fees toward the regional traffic improvements system for the area and installation of the energy savings features. A listing of the Certified EIR mitigation measures related to air quality and their applicability to the revised Project are included in Section 3.4.5 and in the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program(MMRP)in Appendix B. 3.4.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis Changes to the Parkside Estates Project addressed in this Addendum include changes to the Project plans to reflect the CCC's suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment. The Project changes related to Air Quality include: PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-]5 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AIR QUALITY • A decrease in the number of residential units from 170 to 111 units; C A decrease in active/passive park from 8.4 acres to 1.6 acres (a 1.0-acre active park in RL and a 0.6-acre in OS-C) ® A reduction in the amount of imported fill from approximately 270,000 cy to approximately 225,000 cy. Please see Section 2.0 of this Addendum EIR document for more information regarding the Project changes. The changes to the Project, including modifications approved by the CCC, that may affect air quality include the reduction in the number of residences, the reduced park area, and the reduced import of fill. The reduction in the number of dwelling units will result in a commensurate reduction in vehicular trips generated by the Project and therefore a reduction in vehicular emissions as a result of the Project. The reduced quantity of fill needed to create the appropriate grade of the site is expected to result in fewer haul trips to deliver fill and reduced construction activity to grade the site. A reduction in construction emissions may be realized. Mitigation Measures 1 through 6 to reduce construction emissions, as included in the Final EIR for the Project, are applicable to the revised Project. A summary of the criteria pollutants emissions associated with the revised Project is provided in Table 3-2. The changes to the Project result in fewer emissions of each pollutant. None of the pollutants are emitted at levels that would exceed SCAQMD thresholds; however, Mitigation Measures 7 and 8 to assist in reducing long-term operational emissions would still apply. Table 3-2: Project Emission Summary/Criteria Pollutants Pollutant Emissions,lbs/da Source CO ROC NOX I S02 I PMIo PM2.5 Approved Land Uses Stationary Sources 9.1 11 L35 0.01 0.12 0.12 Mobile Sources 230 21 0.22 36 7.0 Total Emissions 239 32 0.23 36 7.1 Planned Land Uses Stationary Sources 5.9 7.2 2.7 0.01 0.07 0.07 Mobile Sources 150 13 20 0.14 23 4.6 Total Emissions 156 20 23 0.15 23 4.7 Net Change -83 -12 -12 -0.08 -13 -2.4 SCA MD Thresholds 550 55 55 150 150 55 Significant? No No No No No No CO=carbon monoxide PM2_5=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size lbs/day=pounds per day ROC=reactive organic compounds NO,=nitrogen oxides SOz=sulfur dioxide PM10=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size Additional information is also included in this Addendum regarding GHG emissions and global climate change. In June 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's GHG emissions reduction targets in Executive Order S-3-05. The Executive Order established the following goals: Statewide GHG emissions should be reduced to 2000 levels by 2010, to 1990 levels by 2020, and to PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-16 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AIR QUALITY 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. On January 18, 2007, California further solidified its dedication to reducing GHGs by setting a new Low Carbon Fuel Standard for transportation fuels sold within the State. Executive Order S-1-07 sets a declining standard for GHG emissions measured in carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent grams per unit of fuel energy sold in California. The goal of the Low Carbon Fuel Standard is to reduce the carbon intensity of California passenger vehicle fuels by at least 10 percent by 2020. California's major initiatives for reducing GHG emissions are outlined in Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the "Global Warming Solutions Act" (Act), passed by the California State legislature on August 31, 2006; a 2005 Executive Order; and a 2004 ARB regulation to reduce passenger car GHG emissions. The statute begins with several legislative findings and declarations of intent,including the following: Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems,a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the Sierra snow pack,a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems. (Health and Safety Code, Section 38501.) The State goal is to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, a reduction of approximately 25 percent, followed by an 80 percent reduction below 1990 levels by 2050. The main strategies for making these reductions are outlined in a Scoping Plan,which,when completed, will include a range of GHG reduction actions that can include direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and nonmonetary incentives, voluntary actions, and market-based mechanisms such as a cap-and-trade system. Pursuant to the requirements of AB 32, the State's reduction in global warming emissions will be accomplished through an enforceable statewide cap on global warming emissions that will be phased in starting in 2012. The Act required ARB to identify a list of"discrete early action GHG reduction measures" by June 30, 2007 (Health and Safety Code, Section 38560(a)). Once on the list, these measures are to be developed into regulatory proposals, adopted by the Board, and made enforceable by January 1, 2010. Additional early action items include a comprehensive framework of regulatory and nonregulatory elements that will result in significant and effective GHG emission reductions. As immediate progress in reducing GHGs can and should be made, AB 32 directed ARB and the newly created Climate Action Team (CAT)to identify a list of"discrete early action GHG reduction measures" that can be adopted and made enforceable by January 1, 2010. CAT is a consortium of representatives from State agencies who have been charged with coordinating and implementing GHG emission reduction programs that fall outside of ARB's jurisdiction. AB 32 requires ARB to adopt GHG emission limits and emission reduction measures by January 1, 2011, both of which are to become effective on January 1, 2012. ARB must also evaluate whether to establish a market-based cap-and-trade system. AB 32 does not identify a significance level of GHG for CEQA or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) purposes, nor has ARB or the City of Huntington Beach adopted such a significance threshold. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3.1 7 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AIR QUALITY Senate Bill 375 (SB 375)was signed into law on October 1,2008,which provides emission-reduction goals around which regions can plan, integrating disjointed planning activities and providing incentives for local governments and developers to follow new, conscientiously planned growth patterns. SB 375 enhances ARB's ability to reach AB 32 goals by directing ARB to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved from the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. ARB will also work with California's 18 metropolitan planning organizations to: align their regional transportation,housing, and LUPs;prepare a"sustainable community strategy"to reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled in their respective regions; and demonstrate the region's ability to attain its GHG reduction targets. To address GHG emissions and global climate change in General Plans and CEQA documents, Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) (Chapter 185, 2007)requires the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop CEQA guidelines on how to address global warming emissions and mitigate project-specific GHGs. OPR is required to prepare, develop, and transmit these guidelines on or before July 1, 2009. In the interim, the OPR, in conjunction with ARB, has published a CEQA and Climate Change Technical Advisory (June 19, 2008) outlining a recommended approach for evaluating climate change in CEQA documents. The primary requirements of the OPR approach are to conduct a good-faith effort to calculate a proposed Project's GHG emissions, determine significance,and mitigate any impacts to the extent feasible. GHG emissions are considered for their potential to contribute to global climate change. The short- term emissions are associated with the use of construction equipment during the fixed construction period. Therefore, there will be no ongoing increase in contribution to global warming as a result of construction emissions, and these contributions to cumulative GHG emissions and global climate change are not considered to be significant. The revised Project results in reduced construction GHG emissions compared to the Project evaluated in the Final EIR. Long-term emissions result from stationary sources as a result of the generation of solid waste, consumption of energy use in the proposed homes, and vehicular emission as a result of the trips generated by the Project. The operational, or long-term, emissions from the revised Project are not `'new"emissions compared to the Project evaluated in the Final EIR; rather, GHG emissions are from sources previously identified in the Final EIR. The proposed Project will generate GHG emissions as a result of solid waste generation, energy consumption , off-site electricity generation and on-site natural gas consumption, and vehicular emissions. The proposed Project, as approved in 2002, included 170 dwelling units and approximately 2,040 ADT. This originally-approved development intensity results in the following estimated GHG emissions (using 2009 emissions factors) expressed as CO2 equivalent: Solid Waste(long-term): 240 tons per year Energy Use(long-term): 1,100 tons per year Vehicular Emissions(long-term): 4,000 tons per year Other Area Sources (long-term): 330 tons per year TOTAL: 5,670 tons per year The proposed Project, as revised since the Final FIR was certified, includes a reduced development footprint, a 35 percent reduction in the number of dwelling units, and an ADT of 1,332. The revised GHG emission(using 2009 emissions factors)compared to the 2002 Project are: PARKSIDE ESTATES 3_1 g ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AIR QUALITY Solid Waste (long-term): 150 tons per year Energy Use(long-term): 720 tons per year Vehicular Emissions(long-term): 2,600 tons per year Other Area Sources(long-term): 200 tons per year TOTAL: 3,670 tons per year As described in Table 3-3 below, the revised Project considered in this Addendum results in approximately 2,000 fewer tons of GHG emissions compared to the Project evaluated in 2002. In addition, the applicant has made voluntary commitments to reduce project-related energy consumption and waste generation(see Appendix C and Section 2.6 of this document). These project commitments would further reduce emissions of GHGs. Table 3-3: Project Emission Summary/GHG Source 7 CO2(tons/year) Approved Land Uses Stationary Sources 1,670 Mobile Sources 4,000 Total Emissions 5,670 Planned Land Uses Stationary Sources 1,090 Mobile Sources 2,600 Total Emissions 3,670 Net Change -2,000 Source:LSA Associates,Inc. Currently, in the Basin, there are no adopted significance thresholds for GHG emissions from residential or commercial development. The SCAQMD has adopted interim significance thresholds for stationary source emissions. The SCAQMD governing board adopted a threshold of 10,000 metric tons of CO2-equivalent GHG emissions per year as potentially significant. If the stationary source threshold is applied as a surrogate for non-stationary sources such as residential development, the approved land uses would not exceed this level, even though the Project site is currently undeveloped with negligible emissions associated with farming activities. The proposed Project changes will not increase an impact previously identified or result in a new adverse impact related to air quality. The changes to the Parkside Estates Project that could have a potential effect on air quality are consistent with the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 regarding Project and cumulative effects to air quality do not require a major change to the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 and will not result in any new significant environmental impacts. Therefore, the comparison of anticipated environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Parkside Estates Project with the air quality impacts documented in the previously certified EIR supports the required CEQA findings below. Specifically,none of the conditions set forth in Section 15126 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3_t 9 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AIR QUALITY 3.4.4 Cumulative Impacts Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that Project changes would result in more substantial or new significant cumulative impacts to air quality than those cumulative impacts identified and analyzed in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. 3.4.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures Based on the analysis above, the air quality impacts of the 2008 Project revision would remain the same or be reduced from those identified in the Certified Final EIR. However, the standard City policies and requirements identified in the Final EIR would still apply to the revised Project. Mitigation Measures 1 through 8 listed below would still apply to the revised Project. 1. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the following: A. During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation, maintain equipment engines in proper tune. B. After clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation: (1)- Wet the area down enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust pickup by the wind; (2) Spread soil binder;and (3) Implement street sweeping as necessary. C. During construction: (1) Use water trucks or a sprinkler system to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust being raised when leaving the site; (2) Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; and; (3) Use low-sulfer fuel (0.05 percent by weight)for construction equipment. D. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high-ozone days. E. Discontinue construction during second-stage smog alerts. 2. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the following(or other reasonably equivalent measures as required by the City Engineer): A. Require a phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily emissions. B. Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. C. Treat unattended construction areas with water(disturbed lands that have been, or are expected to be,unused for four or more consecutive days). D. Require the planning of vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on construction sites. E. Install vehicle wheel-washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites. F. Wash off trucks leaving the site. G. Require all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose substances and building materials to be covered,or to maintain minimum freeboards of 2 feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. H. Use vegetative stabilization whenever possible to control soil erosion from storm water,especially on super pads. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-20 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AIR QUALITY 1. Require enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of sand, dirt, or other aggregate materials. J. Control off-road vehicle travel by posting the driving speed limit on these roads, consistent with the City standards. K. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators when practical. 3. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that vehicle movement on any unpaved surface other than water trucks shall be terminated if wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour(mph). 4. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for the paving of all access aprons to the Project site and the maintenance of the paving. 5. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that construction vehicles be equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. 6. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction-related traffic congestion into the Project grading permit. Measures, subject to the approval and verification by the Public Works Department, shall include,as appropriate: • Provision of rideshare incentives; ® Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel; • Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference; • Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes;and • Use of a flagperson to guide traffic when deemed necessary. 7. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall provide proof to the City's Traffic Engineer that the Project has contributed its "fair-share" toward regional traffic improvement system (traffic impact fees) for the area. This shall include efforts to synchronize traffic lights on streets impacted by Project development. 8. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall provide proof that the energy savings features have been installed in Project homes as required by the Uniform Building Code. Features may include: solar or low-emission water heaters, energy efficient appliances, double-glass paned windows,low-sodium parking lights,etc. 3.4.6 Conclusion The comparison of anticipated environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Parkside Estates 2002 Project with the air quality impacts identified in the previously certified Final EIR supports the required CEQA findings below. Specifically,none of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met. • The revised Project would not result in new significant environmental impacts to air quality, nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to aesthetics/light and glare from that described in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3_2 1 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AIR QUALITY a There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates there are substantial changes in circumstances pertaining to air quality that would require major changes to the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. ® There is no substantial new information that there would be a new significant impact to air quality requiring major revisions of the certified Final EIR No.97-2. o There are no alternatives to the Project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts pertaining to air quality identified in and considered by the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3.22 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EARTH RESOURCES 3.5 NOISE 3.5.1 Existing Environmental Setting Please see Section 5.5 of certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for a detailed discussion of the existing environmental setting for noise. Appendix C of Final EIR No. 97-2 includes the noise calculations prepared on the basis of traffic assumptions for the Parkside Estates Project. The site is currently cultivated, and therefore does not generate noise other than occasional farming-related equipment activity and vehicle trips. The City General Plan, Noise Element, identifies the sound level limit for all residential areas as 65 Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for outdoor and 45 CNEL for indoor areas. Because the area surrounding the Project site is primarily residential, sensitive receptors are present in the vicinity of the Project site. The principal source of noise on the site is from vehicular traffic on Graham Street and a two-lane commuter road that runs adjacent to the site. 3.5.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts Please see Section 5.5 of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for analyses of the potential noise effects of the Parkside Estates Project. The Final EIR No. 97-2 concluded that the proposed Project would not result in a significant increase in Project-specific traffic noise levels along Graham Street. The increase in existing plus Project traffic noise levels would be approximately 0.8 A-weighted decibels (dBA). The Final EIR No. 97-2 determined that the Project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would not result in a significant incremental increase (0.8 dBA) in traffic noise levels in 2020. The Final EIR does not anticipate noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL considering the sound reduction effects of the proposed wall along the northern property line and along Graham Street. Furthermore, the proposed Project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will not result in short-term cumulative construction noise impacts. Final EIR No. 97-2 concluded that the Project may result in a potential significant short-term noise impact during exterior and interior construction activities. The Final EIR includes Mitigation Measures 1 and 2,which necessitate approval of the Noise Mitigation Plan and implementation of the feasible noise attenuation features during grading and construction activities. Lastly, the Final EIR concluded that the Project may result in potential long-term noise impacts. The Final EIR includes Mitigation Measure 3, which requires that constructed sound walls achieve maximum sound attenuation. A listing of the Certified EIR mitigation measures and their applicability to the revised Project are included in Section 3.5.5 and in the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in Appendix B. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-23 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EARTH RESOURCES 3.5.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis Changes to the Parkside Estates Project addressed in this Addendum include changes to the Project plans to reflect the CCC's suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment. The Project changes related to Noise include: • A decrease in the number of residential units from 170 to 111 units; • A decrease in active/passive park from 8.4 acres to 1.6 acres(a 1.0-acre active park in RL and a 0.6-acre in OS-C) • A reduction in the amount of imported fill from approximately 270,000 cy to approximately 225,000 cy. Please see Section 2.0 of this Addendum EIR document for more information regarding the Project changes. The changes to the Project, including modifications approved by the CCC, that may affect noise effects include the overall reduction in the number of residences. Fifty-nine(59)fewer residences will result in a commensurate reduction in vehicular trips generated by the Project and therefore a reduction in the Project's contribution to vehicular noise on surrounding streets. The reduction in the number of dwelling units to be constructed and the associated reduced amount of fill required will result in an overall activity reduction, thereby reducing construction equipment noise. Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 to reduce construction noise are applicable to the revised Project. However, Mitigation Measure 3 regarding construction of a wall along the northern boundary is no longer applicable and necessary. This mitigation measure was originally proposed because of the size of the active park and the associated noise. As the size of the park is substantially reduced with the revised Project,construction of the wall to block the noise is no longer necessary. 3.5.4 Cumulative Impacts Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that Project changes would result in more substantial or new significant cumulative impacts to noise than those cumulative impacts identified and analyzed in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. 3.5.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures Based on the analysis above, the noise impacts of the 2008 Project revisions would remain the same or be reduced from those identified in the Certified Final EIR. However, the standard City policies and requirements identified in the Final EIR would still apply to the revised Project. Mitigation Measures 1, 2, and 3b listed below would still apply. However, Mitigation Measure 3a is no longer applicable to the revised Project due to reduction in active park uses. This Mitigation Measure is shown in italics below. 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit and have approved a noise mitigation plan to the Department of Planning that will reduce or mitigate short-term noise impacts to nearby noise-sensitive uses. The plan shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance and shall include,but not be limited to: A. A criteria of acceptable noise levels based on type and length of exposure to construction noise levels. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-24 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EARTH RESOURCES B. Physical reduction measures such as temporary noise barriers that provide separation between the source and the receptor, and temporary soundproof structures to house portable generators. C. Temporary generators (if utilized) shall be located as far as practical from sensitive noise receptors. D. Mitigation measures such as restrictions on the time of construction for activities resulting in high noise levels. 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall produce evidence acceptable to the City Engineer that: A. All grading and construction vehicles and equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state-of-the-art noise attenuation. B. Stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. C. All operations shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. 3a. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall provide evidence (specifications) acceptable to the City Engineer that the new walls along the Project's northern property (along the rear property line of lot 103 to 2123 in Kenilworth Drive and the side property lines of lots 3125 on Greenleaf Lane of Tract 5792) will he conducted to achieve maximum sound attenuation. 3b. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall provide evidence (specifications) acceptable to the City Engineer that the new walls along Graham Street (along the Project's boundary adjacent to the proposed homes) will be constructed to achieve maximum sound attenuation. 3.5.6 Conclusion The comparison of anticipated environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Parkside Estates 2002 Project with the noise impacts identified in the previously certified Final EIR supports the required CEQA findings below. Specifically, none of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met. 6 The revised Project would not result in new significant environmental impacts to noise,nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to aesthetics/light and glare from that described in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. ® There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates there are substantial changes in circumstances pertaining to noise that would require major changes to the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. ® There is no substantial new information that there would be a new significant impact to noise requiring major revisions of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. ® There are no alternatives to the Project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts pertaining to noise identified in and considered by the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-25 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EARTH RESOURCES 3.6 EARTH RESOURCES 3.6.1 Existing Environmental Setting Please see section 5.6 of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for a detailed discussion of the existing environmental setting for earth resources. Appendix E of Final EIR No. 97-2 includes the geotechnical assessments conducted in 1997 and 1998 and Phase I Assessment prepared for the proposed Parkside Estates Project. Appendix E also includes the County comments and a memo on the original geotechnical assessment prepared in 1997. The comments were addressed in the revised 1998 study. The site is flat, located on the Bolsa Gap floodplain, and is rich in native materials represented by Quarterly Alluvium,marsh, and intertidal channel deposits.According to the Final EIR,the Newport- Inglewood Fault Zone is located in the vicinity but does not encroach into the Project site zone. The fault is known to generate the highest on-site ground accelerations, producing moderate to large earthquakes that could affect the site. Due to the geographical location, the Project site is susceptible to tsunami run-up,seiche,and subsidence. As stated in the Final EIR, 8 site borings and 12 test pits were conducted on the site to determine groundwater levels and soils characteristics. Historically, groundwater was encountered as a seepage at various elevations; however, exploratory borings encountered water generally 6 ft below ground surface(bgs). The 65 cone penetrometer test(CPT) soundings indentified potentially liquefiable soils on site in the form of sands and silt. The Phase I Assessment conducted for the Final EIR revealed that the site is located southeast of the Steverson Bros. Boucher Site,which is under California Environmental Protection Agency(CalEPA) review. The Boucher landfill, which is currently closed, is located off site to the northwest; however, the landfill was determined to pose minimal public risk by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Furthermore, 500 ft northwest of the Project site, Cabo Del Mar condominiums have been developed on the landfill site. The Final FIR states that residual pesticides levels may be present on site due to the previous agricultural uses. In addition,the property is located within Orange County, which is designated as a Radon Zone 3 area (an area where radon gas levels have been estimated to be below 2 picocuries per liter[pCi/L]). The CCC findings state that the bluff along the western edge of the property is not considered a "coastal bluff."The CCC's staff geologist has evaluated the bluff s status and found that the bluff was carved by the ancestral Santa Ana River as it meandered across the Bolsa Chica lowlands. There is evidence that there were tidal wetlands in the Bolsa Chica lowlands prior to dike construction in the early 20th century, but tidal wetlands generally are not the site of extensive marine erosion. Indeed, they are commonly depositional, not erosional, and serve as an efficient buffer from marine erosion. The staff geologist concludes: "In summary,I believe that the bluff at the Shea Home property is best described as a river bluff and is not a coastal bluff in a genetic or geomorphic sense."Thus, the CCC finds that the bluff on the subject site is not a "coastal bluff' (CCC Adopted Findings, p. 61, Appendix A). 3.6.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts Please see Section 5.6 of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for analysis of the effects of the Parkside Estates Project on existing earth resources. The Final EIR concluded that no active or potentially PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-26 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EARTH RESOURCES active faults exist on the site, and that there would be no impacts associated with the ground surface rupture on the Project site. The Final FIR determined that the potential for tsunamis and seiches is low. As stated in Final EIR No. 97-2, the proposed Project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonable foreseeable future projects, will not result in cumulative impacts related to geology/ soils. The Final EIR No. 97-2 concluded that the proposed Project would result in significant settlements of peat deposits within the upper 5 ft,which could continue over the design life of the structures without mitigation in the form of removal and/or surcharge. In addition, a potential exists for significant impacts from the on-site, mildly to severely corrosive soils from soils with poor pavement support characteristics, soils with low shear strength, and potential impacts from soils shrinkage. The Final EIR No. 97-2 includes Mitigation Measures 1 and 2, which require implementation of recommendations contained in Sections 7.0 and 8.0, respectively, of the Geotechnical Study into the earthwork activities. In addition, Final EIR No. 97-2 concluded that the proposed Project may be potentially susceptible to impacts related to ground shaking, liquefaction, and seismic settlement. Final EIR No. 97-2 incorporates Mitigation Measure 1, which necessities implementation of Section 7 of the Geotechnical Study recommendations. It also includes Mitigation Measure 3 which requires all structures to be designed in accordance with seismic provisions of the UBC to prevent any impacts associated with ground shaking. Final EIR No. 97-2 determined that the proposed Project may result in local subsidence of adjacent properties along the Project's northern property boundary due to dewatering and therefore also may result in potential groundwater impacts. Final EIR No. 97-2 incorporates Mitigation Measure 4, which recommends approval of the detailed Dewatering Plan. As stated in Final EIR No. 97-2, the proposed Project may also result in impacts from hazardous materials. Mitigation Measures 5 and 6 are incorporated in the Final EIR to reduce potential adverse effects to below a level of significance. Mitigation Measures 5 and 6 require completion of the Phase II environmental soil sampling and an estimation of radon gas levels and appropriate "clean up"measures if deemed necessary. A listing of the Certified EIR mitigation measures and their applicability to the revised Project are included in Section 3.6.5 and in the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in Appendix B. 3.6.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis Changes to the Parkside Estates Project addressed in this Addendum include changes to the Project plans to reflect the CCC's suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment. The Project changes related to Earth Resources include: • A decrease in the number of residential units from 170 to 111 units; • Commensurate reduction in development area from 37.4 ac to 26.4 ac; • Reduction in the amount of imported fill from approximately 270,000 cy to approximately 225,000 cy. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3.27 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EARTH RESOURCES Please see Section 2.0 of this Addendum EIR document for more information regarding the Project changes. The changes to the Project, including modifications approved by the CCC, that may affect earth resources include a reduction in the development footprint,reduction in the number of dwelling units, and reduction in the amount of imported fill required to construct the Project. The reduction in the number of dwelling units will result in fewer residences that are exposed to potential seismic-, soils-, and hazards-related risks. The reduction in the number of units also potentially reduces the amount of dewatering that will be required, thereby lowering the potential for subsidence impacts. These risks are mitigated to below a level of significance with the measures listed in Section 3.6.5. All six earth resources mitigation measures included in Final EIR No. 97-2 are applicable to the revised Project. Furthermore, the reduction in imported fill required to construct the Project results in reduced change to the topography of the site compared to existing conditions,which does not change any impacts originally identified for earth resources. 3.6.4 Cumulative Impacts Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that Project changes would result in more substantial or new significant cumulative impacts to earth resources than those cumulative impacts identified and analyzed in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. 3.6.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures Based on the analysis above, the earth resources impacts of the 2008 Project revision would remain the same or be reduced from those identified in the Certified Final EIR. However, the standard City policies and requirements identified in the Final EIR would still apply to the revised Project. Mitigation Measures 1 through 6 listed below would still apply to the revised Project. 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the recommendations contained in Section 7.0 of the geotechnical study, located in Appendix E of this document, shall be incorporated into the earthwork activities of the proposed Project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Earthwork activities include grading,clearing and demolition; site preparation;unsuitable soil removals; backcuts, excavation processing; compaction of all fills; mixing; benching; inspection; survey control; subgrade preparation; cut and fill slope construction; haul roads; import soils; structural load and settlements/subsidence measures;and storm drain relocation. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permits, the recommendation contained in Section 8.0 of the geotechnical study,located in Appendix E of this document,shall be incorporated into the structural design of the proposed Project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Structural design activities include: foundation design; settlement, including foundation load, and seismically induced settlement; post-tension slab/foundations; mat foundations; other foundation recommendations, such as footing embedment,underslab treatment, and subgrade moisture content; concrete driveways, sidewalk, and flatwork; structural setbacks; retaining walls; other design and construction recommendations, such as lot drainage; utility excavations;utility trench backfill; corrosion,metallic structures;and concrete structures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, it shall be proven to the Department of Public Works that all structures are designed in accordance with the seismic design provisions of the PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-28 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EARTH RESOURCES Uniform Building Codes or Structural Engineers Association of California to promote safety in the event of an earthquake. 4. Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the applicant shall contract with a dewatering expert to prepare a detailed Dewatering Plan. This plan shall include the placement of monitoring wells near the northern property line to evaluate groundwater levels during the proposed Project dewatering activities. The dewatering activities shall be adjusted immediately if the monitoring wells show groundwater level changes that may affect subsidence of adjacent properties. The dewatering plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. 5. Prior to issuance of grading permits, Phase II environmental soils sampling shall be conducted to determine the residual levels of pesticides in the soil. If inappropriate/unsafe levels are identified by this analysis, "clean-up" measures shall be recommended and implemented. The Phase II sampling and any necessary measures shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. 6. Prior to the final inspection, testing to verify the estimated radon gas levels shall be implemented as deemed necessary by the Department of Planning. 3.6.6 Conclusion The comparison of anticipated environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Parkside Estates 2002 Project with the earth resources impacts identified in the previously certified Final EIR supports the required CEQA findings below. Specifically, none of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met. • The revised Project would not result in new significant environmental impacts to earth resources, nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to aesthetics/light and glare from that described in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates there are substantial changes in circumstances pertaining to earth resources that would require major changes to the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no substantial new information that there would be a new significant impact to earth resources requiring major revisions of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There are no alternatives to the Project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts pertaining to earth resources identified in and considered by the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-29 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DRAINAGE/HYDROLOGY 3.7 DRAINAGE/HYDROLOGY 3.7.1 Existing Environmental Setting Please see Section 5.7 of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for a detailed discussion of the existing environmental setting for drainage and hydrology. Appendix F of Final EIR No. 97-2 includes the Hydrology and Hydraulics Study and the 100-Year Inundation Study prepared for the Parkside Estates Project. According to the Final EIR, the direction of the drainage on site is from northeast to southwest. The majority of the site is located on a 0.07 percent slope. The Final EIR presents the existing condition runoff for a 100-year storm event for the existing drainage site and Project site. The site is located in Zone A99,which identifies areas protected by the federal flood protection system from a flood having a 1 percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year with no base flood elevation determined. Based on the analysis performed for the Project, the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel, located just south of the site, may experience overtopping in the area from Goldenwest Street westerly to Warner Avenue during a 100-year storm event. The Final EIR states that previous land uses on site were agricultural; therefore, some minimal concentration of the fertilizers and pesticides may be present in the runoff. These pollutants would include particulate solids,nutrients,and oxygen-demanding substances. The CCC findings state that the approximately 50-ac Project site is currently undeveloped with the exception of farming activities. Under existing conditions, no runoff leaves the site during most rainfall events. The CCC findings also state that the subject site and much of the surrounding area are susceptible to tidal flooding. Tidal flooding could occur when extreme high tides occur concurrently with storm surge events. The worst-case scenario would occur when high tide and storm surge occurs during failure of the levees of the lower reaches of the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel (which is possible as the levees are not Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA] certified). Under any of these scenarios,up to 170 ac of areas previously developed inland of the site would be flooded. Consequently, contemplation of any development of the subject site must address this flooding issue(CCC Adopted Findings,pp.48 and 59,Appendix A). 3.7.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts Please see Section 5.7 of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for analysis of the effects of the Parkside Estates Project on existing drainage and hydrology. The Final EIR concluded that the proposed Project may result in potentially significant impacts to the drainage pattern and potential flooding. Mitigation Measure 1 requires the implementation of conditions of the Public Works Department regarding storm drain facilities. In addition, there are conditions related to completion of infrastructure improvements pursuant to FEMA requirements to address potential flooding. The Final EIR also determined that the Project may result in significant impacts related to water quality. Mitigation Measures 2 and 3 require compliance with State NPDES permit requirements, including submittal of the Notice of Intent and fees to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and an approval of the Water Quality Management Plan,respectively. As stated in the Final EIR, the proposed Project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, may also result in drainage, flooding, and water quality impacts. Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 will reduce the impacts to below a significant level. PARKS/DE ESTATES 3-30 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DRAIN AGEIHYDROLOGY A listing of the Certified EIR mitigation measures and their applicability to the revised Project are included in Section 3.7.5 and in the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in Appendix B. 3.7.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis Changes to the Parkside Estates Project addressed in this Addendum include changes to the Project plans to reflect the CCC's suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment. The Project changes related to Drainage/Hydrology include: • A decrease in the number of residential units from 170 to I I I units; • Commensurate reduction in development area from 37.4 ac to 26.4 ac; • Provision of additional mechanical treatment of on-site and off-site storm water; • Implementation of an NTS for storm water treatment; • Creation of a restored wetlands complex that includes the modified 4 ac restored EPA wetlands, the AP wetland, and associated wetlands buffer (which overlaps the eucalyptus buffer in some areas); • Inclusion of a VFPF to provide flood control protection (substituting for the sea wall as considered in the Final EIR);and • A reduction in the amount of imported fill from approximately 270,000 cy to approximately 225,000 cy. Please see Section 2.0 of this Addendum EIR document for more information regarding the Project changes. Flooding The CCC found that with or without development of the subject site, the inland 170 ac of existing development requires protection from flood hazard. The path that the tidal flooding would follow crosses the subject site. In order to adequately ensure protection of the inland 170 ac of existing development, installation of a flood protection levee (i.e., a VFPF) on the subject site or to the southwest of the subject site (near the Bolsa Chica "Pocket Wetlands" between the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel and the Bolsa Chica Mesa) is included in the CCC's suggested modifications. Protection of the inland 170 ac would also protect the approximately 50 ac subject site from flooding. Mitigation Measure 1 from Final EIR remains applicable to the revised Project. A VFPF was proposed as part of the revised Project(as a substitution for the"sea wall"considered in the Final EIR) to provide protection against flooding from the newly created muted tidal basin to the west of the site. The East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel is approximately 11 ft above sea level (asl), and the bluff at the western site boundary rises some 40 ft asl. A flood protection levee that closes the gap between these two features could effectively capture tidal floods if it is constructed to an elevation above the expected flood flow. The existing East Garden Grove- Wintersburg Flood Control Channel levee in the area adjacent to the subject site is expected to be reconstructed to meet FEMA certification standards and would have an approximate elevation of 11 ft asl (the existing levee's elevation is also approximately 11 ft asl). If a VFPF were constructed between the bluff and the existing levee to the same elevation, flood waters would be prevented from flooding the subject site as well as the additional 170 inland acres. With or without development of the proposed site, some form of flood protection is warranted to minimize risks to life and property in PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-31 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DRAINAGE/HYDROLOGY areas of high flood hazard, to ensure stability and structural integrity, and to contribute significantly to protection of the surrounding area. The subject site provides an optimum location for the additional flood protection levee necessary to minimize risk to life and property in the 170 developed acres inland of the subject site. The CCC found that construction of a flood protection levee on the site would be adequate to ensure structural integrity and neither create nor contribute significantly to erosion, geologic instability, or destruction of the site or surrounding area. In addition, construction of the flood protection levee would minimize risks to life and property from flood hazard. In order for the additional flood protection levee to function effectively, it would have to be placed within the site's necessary buffer areas. However,as described previously,a flood protection levee in the ESHA or wetland buffer area may be an allowable use within a buffer, provided it is the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative. Water Quality The 2002 approved Project relied solely on mechanical water treatment for storm water runoff, however, there was a condition of approval included by the City Council that contemplated the possibility of implementing a natural treatment concept. The revised Project incorporates an NTS that uses vegetated constructed wetland and open water to treat storm water and weather runoff. Storm water will be directed to the mechanical treatment system along the south boundary of the Project site before being discharged to the NTS. The NTS will treat the required equivalent volume of Project runoff, as well as storm runoff from the existing Cabo Del Mar residential Project to the north, and a total of approximately 25 percent of the dry weather flow in the 2,935 ac Slater watershed. The Project water treatment systems will result in a net improvement in storm water quality discharged to the ocean compared to existing conditions. The NTS will also provide additional wetland and upland habitat. In addition to the NTS,the revised Project includes mechanical treatment of on-site and off-site storm water with Continuous Deflective Separation (CDS) units. The CDS units will remove constituents from off-site and on-site flows. The storm water will then be released to the NTS area,where it will be further filtered by wetland plants and soils before eventual discharge to the Pacific Ocean. The dual approach to storm water treatment will treat Project runoff, and will also treat currently untreated off-site runoff,resulting in a net improvement in storm water quality compared to existing conditions. Mitigation Measures 2 and 3 from the Final EIR remain applicable to the revised Project. CCC-Suggested Modification No. 10(refer to Table 2-1, Summary of CCC-Suggested Modifications) includes LCP policy revisions to ensure implementation of Water Quality BMPs to protect water quality. The CCC found that the subject site represents an opportunity to incorporate an NTS, such as a wetland detention system. There are multiple benefits derived from an NTS, such as pollutant removal, groundwater recharge, habitat creation, and aesthetics. Furthermore, maintenance needs are typically more apparent and less frequent with natural/vegetative treatment systems and thus are more likely to remain effective than mechanical systems,such as storm drain inserts and the like,which can become clogged and otherwise suffer mechanical difficulties. If mechanical treatment control BMPs are not adequately maintained, they will cease to be effective and, consequently, water quality protection would not be maximized. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-32 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DRAINAGE/HYDROLOGY The CCC also found that incorporating an NTS, such as a wetland detention pond system, is feasible at the site. In order to achieve the goal of not creating new adverse water quality impacts,dry weather flow would need to be retained on site to the maximum extent practicable. The best way to accomplish retention of dry weather flow on site typically is some type of NTS.Furthermore, in order to protect water quality year-round, it is appropriate to impose a standard that any runoff that leaves the site must meet. A generally accepted standard for storm water runoff is a requirement to treat at least the 85th percentile storm event, with at least a 24-hour detention time. If dry weather runoff cannot be retained on site, it should be treated (e.g., detained for at least 48 hours and, where practicable,for 7 days in an NTS)(CCC Adopted Findings,pp.4"9,Appendix A). 3.7.4 Cumulative Impacts Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that Project changes would result in more substantial or new significant cumulative impacts to drainage and hydrology than those cumulative impacts identified and analyzed in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. 3.7.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures Based on the analysis above, the drainage/hydrology impacts of the 2008 Project revision would remain the same or be reduced from those identified in the Certified Final EIR. However, the standard City policies and requirements identified in the Final EIR would still apply to the revised Project. Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 listed below would still apply to the revised Project. 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project applicant shall implement conditions of the Public Works department regarding storm drain drainage improvements, which shall include, but not be limited to: • Construct the necessary storm drainage improvements (identified on Exhibit 42 within the EIR)to handle increased flow and intercept off-site flows. • Ensure that the future building pads are placed at elevations suitable to withstand a 100-year flood. • Construct the necessary improvements to the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel (C05)along the site perimeter. 2. Prior to issuance of any grading permits,the applicant shall submit a"Notice of Intent,"along with the required fee to the State Water Resources Control Board to be covered under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction permit and provide the City with a copy of the written reply containing the discharger's identification numbers. 3. Prior to issuance of the grading permits, the applicant shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan showing conformance to the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and all NPDES requirements (enacted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]) for reviews and approval by the City Engineer. The plan shall reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable using management practices, control techniques and systems, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions as appropriate. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-33 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DRAINAGE/HYDROLOGY 3.7.6 Conclusion The comparison of anticipated environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Parkside Estates 2002 Project with the drainage/hydrology impacts identified in the previously certified Final EIR supports the required CEQA findings below. Specifically, none of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met. • The revised Project would not result in new significant environmental impacts to drainage/hydrology, nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to aesthetics/light and glare from that described in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates there are substantial changes in circumstances pertaining to drainage/hydrology that would require major changes to the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no substantial new information that there would be a new significant impact to drainage/hydrology requiring major revisions of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There are no alternatives to the Project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts pertaining to drainage/hydrology identified in and considered by the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. PARKS/DE ESTATES 3-34 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.8 BIOLOGICAL, RESOURCES 3.8.1 Existing Environmental Setting Please see Section 5.8 of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for a detailed discussion of the existing environmental setting for biological resources. Appendix G of Final EIR No. 97-2 includes the wetland delineation assessment and technical report prepared for the Parkside Estates Project. In addition, numerous supplemental wetlands and biology studies of the site have been performed at the request of CCC staff subsequent to the certification of the EIR in 2002. Two such reports summarize additional information on biological resources: (1)Supplemental Biology Report, Parkside Estates Project, Huntington Beach, California,prepared for Shea Homes by LSA Associates, Inc., December 11, 2003; and (2) Biological Assessment and Alternatives Analysis, East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel, Parkside Estates Development Project, prepared for Shea Homes by LSA Associates, Inc., November 11,2004. According to the Final EIR, the site exhibits relatively homogenous ruderal vegetative cover, with infrequent herbaceous species in the agricultural field. A portion of the site was historically formed from the upper margin of the Bolsa Chica marshlands; therefore, the site does contain two secluded patches of marshland fragments in the former County Parcel. The site currently does not support a valuable wetland habitat, although the quality of wetland habitat in the former County parcel, which is to be preserved under the 2002 and revised Project,has improved since the Final EIR was certified in 2002. As stated in the Final EIR, the site habitat supports rodent populations, and trees on and adjacent to the site provide nesting and roosting sites for birds of prey. Therefore, the site may attract resident birds of prey such as red-tailed hawks and owls. In fact, some birds of prey were observed during the site visits. The Final EIR concluded that the site and its surroundings do not support sensitive invertebrates, fish, amphibians, or reptiles. A number of sensitive bird species might forage in or over agricultural fields and the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel, but the site itself could not support and maintain a population of birds. Please refer to the Final EIR and the supplemental LSA 2004 report for the lists of species that may utilize the site. Due to the generally low habitat quality and frequency of human disturbance, the Project site does not support the presence of sensitive mammal species. The site may be utilized by larger, more mobile species (e.g., coyote, fox, bobcat, and raccoon)that may traverse the site. However,there are insufficient resources within the site to induce any of these taxa to remain. The CCC findings state that the results of the CCC review of the aerial photos and topographic maps indicate that the topography of the site has changed over the years,particularly in the area delineated by the EPA as wetlands in its 1989 publication (generally in the northwest area of the site). Changes are also identified in the area of the former equestrian facility (generally in the southwestern portion of the site between the CP and WP areas). These changes included the unpennitted fill of approximately 0.3 ac of wetland in the CP area, which was not rectified prior to the purchase of the property by Shea Homes. However, at its November 14, 2007, hearing, the CCC found, based on evidence presented, that no wetlands exist in the WP area. This is consistent with the information presented in Final EIR No. 97-2,which did not identify any wetlands in the WP area. The CCC found that a 4 ac portion of the approximately 8 ac area that had been delineated as wetland in 1989 by the EPA should be treated as a wetland for purposes of land use decisions, and that this area should be PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-35 ADDENDUM EIIZ MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES restored to wetland functions. The CCC also found that the changes in topography due to farming created a depression of approximately 0.6 ac at the western edge of the agricultural field. This depression, termed the AP, was determined by the CCC to be wetland, which required preservation and a protective buffer. The CCC findings state that the subject site contains ESHA. In addition to the area that was identified as ESHA in Final EIR No. 97-2, the CCC determined that the trees within both the southern and northern "eucalyptus groves" located within and adjacent to the subject site's western boundary are ESHA due to the important ecosystem functions they provide to a suite of raptor species (CCC Adopted Findings,p.42,Appendix A). The CCC's staff ecologist, in a memo dated December 19, 2006, concluded that neither the seasonal gnatcatcher foraging habitat nor the southern tarplant on the subject site meet the Coastal Act definition of ESHA(CCC Adopted Findings,p.44,Appendix A). 3.8.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts Please see Section 5.7 of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for analysis of the effects of the Parkside Estates Project on existing biological resources. The Final EIR concluded that the proposed Project would not result in impacts to the County parcel pocket wetland habitats with the adoption of Alternative 7 as the preferred Project. Mitigation Measure 2,which required wetland restoration,was initially provided when the County parcel was proposed for development. Final EIR No. 97-2 also concluded that the proposed Project may result in potential significant impacts during the nesting season to native raptor birds and cumulative impacts to nesting raptor birds. Mitigation Measure 1 requires that a raptor survey be conducted prior to construction activities if they commence during breeding season. The breeding season originally defined as March-July in the Certified 2002 Final EIR was subsequently expanded to February-July by the 2004 LSA studies. Mitigation Measure 1 has been modified consistent with this revision. If raptor nests are found on site,construction activities should be limited to areas 500 ft away from the nest. A listing of the Certified EIR mitigation measures and their applicability to the revised Project are included in Section 3.8.5 and in the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in Appendix B. 3.8.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis Changes to the Parkside Estates Project addressed in this Addendum include changes to the Project plans to reflect the CCC's suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment. The Project changes related to biological resources include: • A decrease in the number of residential units from 170 to 111 units; • Commensurate reduction in development area from 37.4 ac to 26.4 ac and expands OS-C to 23.1 ac; • Increased protection of biological resources; • Reallocation of land uses (including development area, conservation area, and active and passive parks); • Provision of additional mechanical treatment of on-site and off-site storm water; • Implementation of an NTS for storm water treatment; PAR KSIDE ESTATES 3-36 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ® Expansion of the eucalyptus ESHA designation and creation of a variable ESHA buffer, which includes restricted public access; • Creation of a restored wetlands complex that includes the modified 4 ac restored EPA wetlands, the AP wetland, and associated wetlands buffer (which overlaps the eucalyptus buffer in some areas); • Restoration of the portion of the CP wetland where unpermitted fill occurred; • Inclusion of a VFPF to provide flood control protection (substituting for the sea wall as considered in the Final EIR); and Please see Section 2.0 of this Addendum EIR document for more information regarding the Project changes. The 2002 Project approved by the City incorporated 3.7 ac of OS-C and 0.4 ac of preserved wetland. The revised Project includes 23.1 ac of OS-C, including a 0.6 ac passive park,and 6.2 ac of wetlands, including 4.6 ac of newly restored or created wetlands. In addition, the 2002 approved Project relied solely on mechanical water treatment for storm water runoff.The revised Project incorporates an NTS that reflects natural drainage patterns and uses a vegetated constructed wetland to treat storm water and dry-weather runoff and to provide additional wetland and upland habitat. CCC-suggested Modification No. 5 is intended to ensure implementation of key Project changes, including: • Preservation of ESHA; • Maintenance of ESHA buffers(including a variable buffer for eucalyptus); • Habitat protection and management; • Creation of a water quality NTS area at the southern portion of the development; and • A VFPF. For example, Suggested Modification No. 5 requires preparation of a Habitat Management Plan for all ESHA, wetland, and buffer areas designated OS-C to provide for their restoration and perpetual conservation and management. Other requirements include a Pest Management Plan that prohibits the use of rodenticides, a Landscape Plan for nonconservation areas that prohibits invasive species and encourages native species, and a Domestic Animal Control Plan to prevent pets from entering the OS-C areas. These management plans are designed to protect and promote native plants and wildlife. Suggested Modification No. 5 also includes standards for wetlands ESHA, the Habitat Management Plan, and protective fencing. Suggested Modification No. 11 furthers the protection offered to ESHA under the Coastal Act by specifying that wetlands or ESHA that were impacted by activities without compliance with the Coastal Act are still subject to the protection afforded by the LUP. The overall effect of the Project changes, including the suggested modifications, is to increase the on-site area dedicated to OS-C, increase the habitat value of the site,and improve storm water quality. The changes result in an improvement to the biological resource value of the developed site and do not necessitate changes to the conclusion of the Final EIR. Additionally, the CCC findings state that, in order to be most protective of wetlands, the additional wetland area, beyond what was originally proposed to be designated OS-C, must be recognized and appropriately designated under the LUP Amendment. The protected areas include the AP and expanded CP areas, and a 4 ac portion of the wetland area identified by the EPA in a document published in 1989. The area delineated by the EPA as wetland totaled approximately 8.3 ac. The PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-37 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES applicant and several wetland experts(including the lead author of the wetland study that was utilized by the EPA) argued that the EPA delineation was not based on adequate evidence. In fact,two federal agencies with wetland delineation authority, the Corps and the Natural Resources Conservation Service, later determined that the EPA area was a "prior converted cropland", not a wetland. In addition, as described in the October 25, 2007, memorandum prepared by the CCC's staff ecologist, the 8.3 ac figure appears to have been based on observations during a period when construction activities on an adjacent property resulted in a temporary direction of excess off-site drainage onto the subject site. Nevertheless, the CCC, based on the recommendation of the staff ecologist, determined that a reasonable estimate for the size of the wetland before and after the construction is about 4 ac. Long-time farming activities resulted in the loss of the 4 ac EPA wetlands area, as determined by the CCC (and consistent with information presented in EIR No. 97-2). Section 30233 of the Coastal Act requires that loss of wetlands due to fill must be mitigated, and the CCC found that the 4 ac modified EPA wetlands must be restored in place. Therefore, in addition to the AP, an additional 4 ac of restoration on site surrounded by a 100 ft buffer would be required to address the loss of the 4 ac EPA wetlands. Thus, area that must be preserved on site includes the AP, expanded CP areas (to include restoration of the area filled by the stable operation), modified 4 ac EPA wetlands, ESHA areas, wetlands, and ESHA buffer area. Preservation and/or restoration of the AP, expanded CP, and restored 4 ac EPA wetlands may require supplemental water(CCC Adopted Findings,pp. 35-36,Appendix A). The CCC found that construction of a flood protection levee within the wetland buffer area,provided it is the least environmentally damaging alternative, would not be incompatible with the continuance of the wetland. The type of flood protection levee to be constructed would be a VFPF (essentially a vegetated earthen berm with an internal sheet pile wall). The VFPF would not be expected to adversely impact the wetland because: (1)there would only be temporary construction-related impacts; (2)once constructed,the VFPF would be planted to provide upland habitat that complements the wetland vegetation; and (3)the VFPF would not require frequent or extensive maintenance once constructed. Thus, intrusions into the buffer would be limited only to those necessary during construction. For these reasons, locating a flood protection levee such as the one described above within the wetland buffer would be consistent with the Coastal Act policies regarding wetlands protection(CCC Adopted Findings,p.40,Appendix A). The City originally recognized the eucalyptus grove as sensitive habitat,but only to the extent that it had been previously recommended as ESHA by CDFG, as part of the continuous grove located primarily on the adjacent Hearthside property. The CCC found that all of the eucalyptus on the Parkside Estates property met its definition of ESHA. The variable-width ESHA buffer includes a water quality NTS as an allowable use within the ESHA buffer area near the southern grove. The CCC found that portions of an NTS would be appropriate within the ESHA buffer because it would occupy only a very small portion of the overall buffer area. Furthermore, the NTS itself will provide some habitat value. The shallow water habitat will increase the variety of habitats within the buffer area. For these reasons, allowing an NTS-type system within the outer ESHA buffer would not be expected to degrade the ESHA and would be compatible with its continuance (CCC Adopted Findings,p.45,Appendix A). Additionally, the CCC found it was appropriate to incorporate additional measures into the LUP Amendment for the subject site to ensure that future development adjacent to the wetland and buffer areas and throughout the site does not adversely impact the wetland. For example, restrictions were placed on landscaping to prevent invasive plants within the residential areas from invading the PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-38 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES wetland areas and potentially displacing the wetland plants. In addition, pets from the residential development, if unrestricted, may enter .the wetland area, causing disruption. The suggested modifications include a prohibition on invasive plants throughout the site, a requirement for a domestic animal management plan, and fencing along the buffer/development interface as part of the site-specific LUP language. With these modifications, the LUP Amendment was found to be consistent with Section 30250 of the Coastal Act(CCC Adopted Findings,p.41,Appendix A). With changes to the ESHA per the suggested modifications,the areas of marginal gnatcatcher habitat and the southern tarplant on site will be retained within the OS-C designation and protected from the development. 3.8.4 Cumulative Impacts Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that Project changes would result in more substantial or new significant cumulative impacts to biological resources than those cumulative impacts identified and analyzed in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. 3.8.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures Based on the analysis above, the biological resources impacts of the 2008 Project revisions would remain the same or be reduced from those identified in the Certified Final EIR. However, the standard City policies and requirements identified in the Final EIR would still apply to the revised Project. Mitigation Measure 1 listed below would still apply. However, Mitigation Measure 2 is no longer applicable to the revised Project,as there will be no development within the County parcel and is therefore shown in italics below. 1. If Project grading construction is scheduled during the normal breeding season for red-tailed hawk and other raptors locally (February to July), a survey shall be conducted for active nests. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, should any active nests be located within the zone of potential disturbance, construction activities shall be limited to areas 500 feet away from the nest until the young have fledged and have begun foraging away from the nest site. The 500-foot protection zone shall be fenced with visible warning-color materials. Nest trees shall be removed during the nonbreeding season only. 2. Wetland impacts to the isolated pocket wetlands shall be mitigated at a ratio of 4:1 (square footage of wetlands to square footage of fill). The Coastal Development Permit shall require that mitigation for the fill of the pocket wetlands be implemented prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the County Parcel. The mitigation site shall be on-site or within the Bolsa Chica Lowlands unless the Lowlands are sold to a new landowner and the new landowner is unwilling to allow the proposed mitigation to proceed. In such a case, the developer of the site shall find an alternative mitigation site. The total mitigation for the loss of two small patches of degraded pickleweed habitat shall include the preservation and enhancement of 2 acres of appropriate wildlife habitat per the Department of Fish and Game. 3.8.6 Conclusion The comparison of anticipated environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Parkside Estates 2002 Project with the biological resources impacts identified in the previously certified Final EIR supports the required CEQA findings below. Specifically, none of the conditions set forth in Section PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-39 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met. • The revised Project would not result in new significant environmental impacts to biological resources, nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to aesthetics/light and glare from that described in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates there are substantial changes in circumstances pertaining to biological resources that would require major changes to the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no substantial new information that there would be a new significant impact to biological resources requiring major revisions of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There are no alternatives to the Project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts pertaining to biological resources identified in and considered by the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-40 ADDEND UM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLGICAL RESOURCES 3.9 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.9.1 Existing Environmental Setting Please see Section 3.9 of the certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 for a detailed discussion of the existing environmental setting for cultural and paleontological resources. Appendix H of Final EIR No. 97-2 includes the "Archaeological Assessment of the SHEA Homes Project Tentative Tract 15377 and Tentative Tract 15419," dated March 1997. This information was updated in 2000 with an additional survey of the Project site as included in Appendix H of Final EIR No. 97-2. Cultural and paleontological resources on the Project site include a portion of CA-ORA-83/86 on the western margins of the Project site and two smaller and less significant archaeological sites designated CA-ORA-1308 and CA-ORA-1309. The Project site does not contain any recognized or previously recorded paleontological resources. There have been no changes to cultural or paleontological resources on the site since certification of Final EIR No. 97-2. 3.9.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts Please see Section 5.9 of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2 for analyses of the potential effects of the Parkside Estates Project to cultural and paleontological resources. The Final EIR concluded that no historic resources exist on the Project site, and that the Project will not affect historic resources or existing local religious or sacred uses. The Final EIR also concluded that the proposed Project will not result in significant impacts to paleontological resources. The Final EIR concluded that the proposed Project may result in a significant impact to archaeological sites CA-ORA-1308 and -1309. The status of CA-ORA-1308 and -1309 as archaeological sites could not be confirmed. Final EIR No. 97-2 includes mitigation to require a subsurface test investigation for both sites, a cultural resources management plan based on the test results, and archaeological monitoring. The proposed Project avoids direct impacts to CA-ORA 83/86. A listing of the Certified EIR mitigation measures and their applicability to the revised Project are included in Section 3.9.5 and in the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in Appendix B. 3.9.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis Changes to the Parkside Estates Project addressed in this Addendum include changes to the Project plans to reflect the CCC's suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment. The Project changes related to cultural and paleontological resources include: • A decrease in the number of residential units from 170 to 111 units; • Commensurate reduction in development area from 37.4 ac to 26.4 ac; • Increased protection of biological resources; • Reallocation of land uses (including development area, conservation area, and active and passive parks); • Expansion of the eucalyptus ESHA designation and creation of a variable ESHA buffer, which includes restricted public access; PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-41 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLGICAL RESOURCES o A reduction in the amount of imported fill from approximately 270,000 cy to approximately 225,000 cy. Please see Section 2.0 of this Addendum EIR document for more information regarding the Project changes. The changes to the Project, including modifications approved by the CCC, that may affect cultural resources include reallocation of land uses, expansion of the buffer area, and increased conservation area. Generally, the increased area subject to preservation rather than development provides greater protection for potential cultural or paleontological resources, although ground disturbance will be required to create the NTS and VFPF. Site CA-ORA-83/86 will still be avoided, and sites CA-ORA- 1308 and -1309 will still be subject to testing. Cultural resources Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 apply to the revised Project evaluated in this Addendum, which is consistent with the CCC's LUP action. Therefore, changes to the Project may result in a reduction of impacts to cultural resources, and there are no changes to the conclusions of Final EIR No. 97-2. The CCC-suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment include a specific requirement to avoid and/or mitigate archaeological impacts. This change provides assurance that the potential for archaeological resources to occur on the site will be recognized in conjunction with future development proposals(CCC Adopted Findings,p. 58,Appendix A). 3.9.4 Cumulative Impacts Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that Project changes would result in more substantial or new significant cumulative impacts to cultural or paleontological resources than those cumulative impacts identified and analyzed in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. 3.9.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures Based on the analysis above, the cultural and paleontological resources impacts of the 2008 Project revision would remain the same or be reduced from those identified in the Certified Final EIR. However, the standard City policies and requirements identified in the Final EIR would still apply to the revised Project. Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 listed below would still apply to the revised Project. 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall conduct a subsurface test investigation for CA-ORA-1308 and -1309 to determine the horizontal boundaries of the site as well as to confirm the surface conclusions of nonsignificance as indicated in the March 1997 Archaeological Assessment. This may be accomplished through the mechanical excavation of a number of auger holes as well as two lxl-meter hand-excavated units for straight graphic control. The subsurface test investigation, which includes discussion of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of resources), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall create (if deemed necessary through Measure 1 above) a cultural resource management plan based on test results. A full data recovery program shall be designed if site avoidance is not feasible through design. Possible recovery plans include, but are not limited to, preservation, salvage, partial salvage, or no PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-42 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLGICAL RESOURCES mitigation measure necessary. The plan shall include consultation with the appropriate Native American organization and be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director.Additionally, the plan shall require peer review in conformance with the California Coastal Commission's Archaeological Guidelines. 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide written evidence that a certified archaeologist has been retained, shall be present at the pregrading meeting/conference, shall establish procedures for archaeological resource surveillance, and shall establish, in cooperation with the Project proponent,procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of the artifacts as appropriate. The archaeological resource surveillance procedure shall include a provision for Native American review of grading operations. If additional or unexpected archaeological features are discovered, the archaeologist shall report such findings to the applicant, the Planning Department, and the appropriate Native American organization. If the archaeological resources are found to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the applicant, for exploration and/or salvage. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 3.9.6 Conclusion The comparison of anticipated environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Parkside Estates 2002 Project with the cultural and paleontological resources impacts identified in the previously certified Final EIR supports the required CEQA findings below. Specifically, none of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met. o The revised Project would not result in new significant environmental impacts to cultural and paleontological resources, nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to aesthetics/light and glare from that described in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. Y There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates there are substantial changes in circumstances pertaining to cultural and paleontological resources that would require major changes to the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no substantial new information that there would be a new significant impact to cultural and paleontological resources requiring major revisions of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There are no alternatives to the Project ors additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts pertaining to cultural and paleontological resources identified in and considered by the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. PARKS/DE ESTATES 3-43 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES 3.10 PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES 3.10.1 Existing Environmental Setting Please see Section 3.10 of the certified 2002 Final FIR No. 97-2 for a detailed discussion of the existing environmental setting for public services and utilities. Appendix A of Final FIR No. 97-2 includes the utility and service questionnaires that were sent to utility and service providers. As stated in the Final FIR, the Project site is serviced by the Huntington Beach Fire Department with respect to fire stations, and the Huntington Beach Police Station, with respect to police stations. The site is serviced by the Ocean View School District,which provides for elementary and middle school facilities, whereas the Huntington Beach Union High School District,provides facilities and services for high schools. Potable water for domestic, fire, and irrigation service is provided by the City Water Division. Existing sewer is provided by the City and OCSD. According to the Final FIR,the existing sewer line at Graham Street is deficient, and there is a need to provide for a new sewer lift station. The Project site is currently vacant and used for farming. Currently, there is minimal demand for fire,police, and water service, and no demand created by the Project site for school capacity or sewer service. Natural gas and electricity is provided by Southern California Edison. However, the existing on-site uses do not place a significant demand on these services. 3.10.2 Certified 2002 Final EIR No. 97-2 Impacts Please see Section 5.10 of the certified Final FIR No. 97-2 for analyses of the potential effects of the Parkside Estates Project to public services and utilities. The Final FIR concluded that the proposed Project may create increased demand for public services and utilities on a local and regional basis. Additionally, the Project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonable foreseeable future projects, will create an increased demand on fire,police, schools,community services,water,sewage, natural gas,electrical services,solid waste,telephone,and library. • Fire: Mitigation Measure 1 requires approval of building plans by the fire official. • Police: Mitigation Measures 2 and 3 require consultation with the Police Department regarding the Project safety features and improvements, as well as easy access to and from the Project site for emergency vehicles,respectively. • School: Mitigation Measures 4 and 5 reduce impacts to schools and require provision of school fees, and proof of compliance with the Mitigation Agreement with Huntington Beach Union High School District,subject to approval of the City. • Water: Final FIR No. 97-2 concluded that Mitigation Measures 6 through 15 will reduce potential significant impacts related to provision of water. Mitigation Measure 6 requires submittal of the hydraulic computer water model analysis. Mitigation Measures 7, 8, 9, 10, 14,and 15 implement water conserving features,pervious paving materials,and use of water- efficient irrigation systems and drought-tolerant plants. Mitigation Measure I requires consultation with the City Public Works Department regarding the review of water conserving measures. Mitigation Measure 13 requires LAFCO approval of annexation of the County parcel into the City and OCSD. • Sewer: Mitigation Measure 16 requires construction of the new sewer lift station and force main in accordance with the City-approved Sewer Plan. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-44 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES • Natural Gas: Mitigation Measure 17 requires consultation with the designated natural gas provider regarding potential for further energy conservation measures. • Electricity: Mitigation Measure 18 requires consultation with Southern California Edison regarding potential for further energy conservation measures. • Telephone: Building plans must be submitted to General Telephone Company(GTE). • Library: Payment of development fees address increased demand for library services. • Solid Waste Disposal: Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 require approval of the waste reduction programs and use of most efficient and economical means for trash removal,respectively. • Natural Resources and Energy: Compliance with the Title 24 standards is required. A listing of the Certified EIR mitigation measures and their applicability to the revised Project are included in Section 3.10.5 and in the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in Appendix B. 3.10.3 Project Changes/Impact Analysis Changes to the Parkside Estates Project addressed in this Addendum include changes to the Project plans to reflect the CCC's suggested modifications to the LUP Amendment. The Project changes related to Public Services and Utilities include: • A decrease in the number of residential units from 170 to 111 units; • Commensurate reduction in development area from 37.4 ac to 26.4 ac; • Increased protection of biological resources; • Reallocation of land uses (including development area, conservation area, and active and passive parks); • Provision of additional mechanical treatment of on-site and off-site storm water; • Implementation of an NTS for storm water treatment; • Inclusion of a VFPF to provide flood control protection (substituting for the sea wall as considered in the Final EIR);and The annexation of the County parcel to the OCSD also occurred subsequent to certification of the Final EIR. Thus, the requirements of Mitigation Measure 13 have been satisfied, and there is no change in the conclusion of the Final EIR that this impact is reduced to below a level of significance with implementation of mitigation. Please see Section 2.0 of this Addendum EIR document for more information regarding the Project changes. The revised Project includes similar public infrastructure improvements to the 2002 approved Project such as levee repair to the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel and levee enhancement with the implementation of a VFPF, enlarged storm drains, increased pump capacity at the Slater pump station (or equivalent option), construction of a new lift station and force main for sanitary sewer, and installation of mechanical water treatment (CDS units) for storm water. The revised Project also includes the NTS for storm water treatment. This approach was identified as a possible BMP solution by the 2002 City Council-approved Conditions of Approval. The changes to the Project, including modifications approved by the CCC, that may affect public services and utilities include a reduction in the number of dwelling units and the provision of additional natural treatment of on-site and off-site storm water. The reduction in the number of PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-45 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES allowed residences will reduce the increase in demand for utilities and services, such as water, sewer, and police services. However, in terms of Project demand on schools, although there would be a reduction of 35 percent in residential units,the total number of students potentially generated by the Project could increase by 4 percent. This is due to the fact that the Ocean View School District has doubled their student generation factor for elementary school since 2002. The student generation factors have increased from 0.329 to 0.66 for elementary school and from 0.089 to 0.12 for middle school. As a result of this change, the proposed Project could generate a total of 73 elementary students (compared to 56 students for the 2002 approved Project). Despite the increase in the middle school generation factor, the Project would generate fewer middle school students (i.e., 13) compared to the 2002 approved Project (i.e., 15), as a result of the decrease in units. The Huntington Beach Union High School District generation factor of 0.20 has not changed since 2002. With the reduction in Project size, 12 less high school students are projected (22 compared to 34). The increase of 17 elementary school students due to an increase in the student generation factor and an overall increase of three students (108 compared to 105) is not a significant impact. Worth noting, the Ocean View School District has been experiencing declining enrollment and expects that to continue. Potential impacts associated with new students will be adequately mitigated as the school mitigation measures listed below would still apply. In terms of other public services and utilities, despite the reduction in demand, all mitigation measures summarized above and listed in Section 3.10.5 remain applicable to the Project. 3.10.4 Cumulative Impacts Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that Project changes would result in more substantial or new significant cumulative impacts to public services and utilities than those cumulative impacts identified and analyzed in the certified Final FIR No. 97-2. 3.10.5 Standard City Policies and Mitigation Measures Based on the analysis above, the public services and utilities impacts of the 2008 Project revision would remain the same or be reduced from those identified in the Certified Final EIR. However, the standard City policies and requirements identified in the Final EIR would still apply to the revised Project. Mitigation Measures 1 through 18 listed below would still apply to the revised Project. However,Mitigation Measure 13 has been satisfied and therefore is shown in italics below. Fire 1. Prior to approval of building pennits, building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. If, during the Fire Department's plan check, it becomes evident that fire ground operations will become impeded, the Department will impose additional fire code requirements in addition to the automatic sprinkler systems,alarm systems, access roads,etc. Police 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Police Department shall be consulted during the preliminary stages of the Project design to review the safety features, determine their adequacy,and suggest improvement. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-46 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES 3. During construction and at complete build out, the Project shall provide easy access into and within the Project site for emergency vehicles, and addresses shall be well marked to facilitate response by officers. Prior to the first final inspection, Project site plans depicting these requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Police Department. Schools 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part of the building permit application. These fees shall be based on the State fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit applications. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall show proof of compliance with the Mitigation Agreement established with the Huntington Beach Union High School District, subject to the approval of the City of Huntington Beach. Water 6. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer shall submit a hydraulic computer water model analysis for the development proposed on the City parcel,which addresses the following: A. Water demand required by Project(fire flow demand by the Fire Department) B. Master Plan/General Plan Amendment (GPA)review. The City of Huntington Beach Water (Master Plan) System Computer Model (i.e., H2OBoyleNET) must be run with the proposed land use demands (i.e., GPA), and contrasted with the model run using the existing land use demands (i.e., General Plan in effect at the time the Water Master Plan was adopted). The City of Huntington Beach Water Division must be contracted to perform this analysis on the existing City of Huntington Beach Water System Model (H2ONET) for a fee to be paid by the developer a minimum of 30 days in advance. If the analysis shows that Project demands cannot be met with the City's current water system, the developer shall be required to upgrade the City's system to meet the demands and/or otherwise mitigate the impacts of the Project at no cost to the City. 7. Prior to final inspection, the following water conservation measures shall be implemented as required by State law: A. Ultra-low-flush toilets B. Ultra-low-flow showers and faucets C. Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating systems D. Compliance with water conservation provisions of the appropriate plumbing code 8. Prior to final inspection, water pressure regulators to limit downstream pressure to a maximum of 60 pounds per square inch(psi)shall be installed. 9. Prior to issuance of building permits, pervious paving materials shall be used whenever feasible to reduce the surface water runoff and aid in groundwater recharge, and slopes and grades shall be controlled to discourage water waste through runoff. 10. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall provide information to prospective residents regarding benefits of low-water-use landscaping and sources of additional assistance in selecting irrigation and landscaping. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-47 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES 11. The Water Division and Park, Tree, and Landscape Division of the City's Public Works Department shall be consulted during design and construction of the Park for further water conservation measures to review irrigation designs and drought-tolerant plant use, as well as measures that may be incorporated into the Project to reduce peak-hour water demand. 12. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer shall submit a hydraulic computer water model analysis for the portion of the Project to be developed on the County parcel, which addresses the following: A. Water demand required by Project(fire flow demand by the Fire Department) B. Master Plan/GPA review. The City of Huntington Beach Water(Master Plan) System Computer Model (i.e., H2OBoyleNET) must be run with the proposed land use demands (i.e., GPA), and contrasted with the model run using the existing land use demands (i.e., General Plan in effect at the time the Water Master Plan was adopted). The City of Huntington Beach Water Division must be contracted to perform this analysis on the existing City of Huntington Beach Water System Model (H2ONET), for a fee to be paid by the developer a minimum of 30 days in advance. If the analysis shows that Project demands cannot be met with the City's current water system, the developer shall be required to upgrade the City's system to meet the demands and/or otherwise mitigate the impacts of the Project at no cost to the City. Any incremental impacts to the City's water system would need to be mitigated to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works—Water Division. 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits,for any lot within the 4.5-acre parcel within the County of Orange, the applicant shall show proof from Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of approval of annexation of the County parcels to the City of Huntington Beach and the Orange County Sanitation District subject to the approval of the City Planning and Public Works Departments. 14. Irrigation systems within the Park that minimize water waste shall be used to the greatest extent possible. Such measures should involve,where appropriate,the following features: A. Raised planters and berming in conjunction with closely spaced, low-volume, low- angle(22.5-degree)sprinkler heads. B. Drip irrigation. C. Irrigation systems controlled automatically to ensure watering during early morning or evening hours to reduce evaporation losses. D. The use of reclaimed water for irrigated areas and grass lands. The Project Applicants shall connect to the Orange County Water District "Green Acres" system of reclaimed water should this supply of water be available. Separate irrigation services shall be installed to ease this transition. 15. Landscape and irrigation plans for the Park that encourage minimized use of lawns and utilize warm-season, drought-tolerant species shall be submitted to and approved by the Water Division and Park,Tree, and Landscape Division. Sewer 16. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the property owner(Shea Homes) shall construct the new sewer lift station and force main in accordance with the City-approved Sewer Plan for PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-48 ADDENDUM EIR MAY 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES the proposed Project, and implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding sewer infrastructure improvements to handle increased sewer flow demands. Natural Gas 17. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Southern California Gas Company or designated natural gas provider shall be consulted during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. Electricity 18. Prior to issuance of building permits, Southern California Edison shall be consulted with during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. 3.10.6 Conclusion The comparison of anticipated environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Parkside Estates 2002 Project with the public services and utilities impacts identified in the previously certified Final EIR supports the required CEQA findings in listed below. Specifically, none of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met. • The revised Project would not result in new significant environmental impacts to public services and utilities, nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to aesthetics/light and glare from that described in the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates there are substantial changes in circumstances pertaining to public services and utilities that would require major changes to the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There is no substantial new information that there would be a new significant impact to public services and utilities requiring major revisions of the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. • There are no alternatives to the Project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts pertaining to public services and utilities identified in and considered by the certified Final EIR No. 97-2. PARKSIDE ESTATES 3-49 ADDENDUM EIR APPENDIX A CCC-ADOPTED FINDINGS AND CERTIFICATION LETTER PARKSIDE ESTATES ADDENDUM EIR STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate,Suite 1000 Long Beach,CA 90802-4302 (562)590-5071 August 18, 2008 Scott Hess (/ Director of Planning 00 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Effective Certification of City of Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan Amendment No. 1-06 (Parkside) Dear Mr. Hess: We are pleased to notify you that on August 7, 2008, the Commission concurred with the Executive Director's determination that the action of the City of Huntington Beach accepting certification of Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan (LCP) Amendment No. 1-06 with suggested modifications was legally adequate. Therefore, the LCP amendment will be fully effective upon filing of the notice of the Commission's certification with the Secretary of the Resources Agency as provided by Public Resources Code Section 21080.5(d)(2)(v). City of Huntington Beach LCP Amendment No. 1-06 was submitted for Commission certification pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2002-123. Huntington Beach LCPA 1- 06 establishes land use designations for: a forty acre area that was previously deferred certification, a five acre adjacent area that was annexed by the City in 2004, and, an adjacent five acre, previously certified area. Land use designations approved for the site are Open Space—Conservation and Residential. On November 14, 2007, the Commission approved LCP Amendment No. 1-06 with suggested modifications. On June 16, 2008, the Huntington Beach City Council adopted Resolution No. 2008-31, acknowledging receipt of the Coastal Commission Action and accepting and agreeing to Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 1-06 as modified. Also on June 16, 2008, the Huntington Beach City Council adopted Resolution No. 2008-32 amending the Local Coastal Program by amending the Coastal Element. On August 7, 2008, the Commission concurred with the Executive Director's determination that the City Council's acceptance of the Commission's suggested modification was legally adequate. On behalf of the Coastal Commission, I would like to congratulate the City on the completion of LCP Amendment 1-06. If you have any questions, please contact Meg Vaughn at our Long Beach office (562)590-5071. Since Teresa Henry District Manager cc: Mary Beth Broeren, Principal Planner HNB LCPA 1-06 fnlcet Itr 8.13.08 my t STATE OF CALIFORN[A-THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Ai ea Office 2000ceangate,Suite IWO Long Beach,CA 90802-4302 (562)590-5071 May 20, 2008 TO: Commissioners and Interested Persons FROM: Sherilyn Sarb, Deputy Director, South Coast District, Orange County Teresa Henry, Manager, South Coast District Karl Schwing, Supervisor, Regulation & Planning, Orange County Area Meg Vaughn, Coastal Program Analyst SUBJECT: ADOPTED FINDINGS for Major Amendment Request No. 1-06 (Shea Homes/Parkside)to the City of Huntington Beach Certified Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan (Pursuant to Commission action at the Public Hearing on the May 7, 2008 meeting in Marina del Rey reflecting the Commission's action at the November 14, 2007 hearing). SUMMARY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH LCP AMENDMENT REQUEST NO. 1-06 Request by the City of Huntington Beach to amend the Land Use Plan (LUP) portion of the Local Coastal Program (LCP). The proposed Local Coastal Program (LCP) amendment is a project-specific amendment designed to make possible a low density residential development on a vacant, approximately 50-acre site comprising two legal lots, most of which is currently in agricultural production. Of the total project area, approximately 45 acres have long been located within the City of Huntington Beach. The remaining 5 acres were, until 2004, located within unincorporated County of Orange jurisdiction, within the Bolsa Chica LCP area. However, with the recent annexation, the entire site is within the City of Huntington Beach. Of the 45 acre portion of the site, approximately 40 acres were deferred certification at the time the City's overall Local Coastal Program was certified and remains uncertified today. This LCP amendment would incorporate that 40 acres and the newly annexed area into the City's existing LCP and establish land use and zoning designations for those areas. The remaining five acre portion of the 45 acre area was certified at the time the City's overall LCP was certified as Open Space—Park (OS-P). The 40 acre area was originally deferred certification due in part to wetland issues. The City's current amendment requests designation of approximately 38.5 acres as RL-7 (Low Density Residential _maximum 7 units per acre), approximately 8.2 acres as OS-P (Open Space— Park), and approximately 3.3 acres as OS—C (Open Space— Conservation). SUMMARY OF COMMISSION ACTION At the Commission hearing of November 14, 2007 the Commission reviewed the City of Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program Amendment 1-06. The Commission approved with revised suggested modifications the City's request to amend the LCP Land Use Plan as requested. At the Commission hearing of May 7, 2008 the Commission adopted Revised Findings with changes to the original staff recommended revised findings. The final version of the suggested modifications and findings adopted by the Commission at r Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Y Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 2 the May 7, 2008 hearing, which reflect the Commission's November 14, 2007 action on the LCPA, are contained in these adopted findings. At the November 14, 2007 hearing, public testimony and Commission discussion included concerns regarding the extent of wetland on site, the appropriate distance for ESHA buffer areas and appropriate uses allowed within ESHA buffer areas. The Commission found that the area referred to as the Wintersburg Pond (WP) was not wet enough to develop a preponderance of wetland vegetation or wetland soils; that the area known as the EPA wetland was wet enough to support a preponderance of wetland vegetation or soils in 1996 and that any changes in local hydrology that may have taken place since that time were unpermitted; a variable width buffer distance would be adequate to protect the eucalyptus grove ESHA; and that areas referred to as "intermingled areas" found between the areas identified as wetland, ESHA, and buffer areas should not be designated Open Space- Conservation. The changes made by the Commission at the hearing are manifested in the staff report primarily though changes to Exhibit NN (now 4"' revised) in that the areas of the site to be designated Open Space—Conservation and the areas to be designated as the development envelope (which allows either active park or residential development)have changed.. In addition, the changes made by the Commission at the hearing result in changes to the suggested modification regarding the width of the ESHA buffer area and uses allowed within that buffer area. Also, there are changes to the wetland findings supporting the Commission's determination that the WP area is not a wetland and to eliminate the discussion on the intermingled areas. Finally, changes are made in the ESHA findings to support the variable width ESHA buffer rather than the 100 meter ESHA buffer, and to allow a portion of a water quality Natural Treatment System as an allowable use within a portion of the outer ESHA buffer subject to restrictions. COMMISSION VOTE: The Commissioners voting on the prevailing side were: Burke, Clark, Hueso, Secord, Neely, Potter, Reilly, and Chair Kruer. STANDARD OF REVIEW For the proposed Land Use Plan amendment, the standard of review is conformance with and satisfaction of the requirements of the Chapter 3 policies of the Coastal Act. SUMMARY OF PAST ACTIONS ON THIS LCPA At the May 2007 hearing in San Pedro, after presentations by staff, the applicant, and public testimony, the Commission voted to deny the subject Land Use Plan amendment, as submitted. A motion (Le. the main motion)was made to approve the Land Use Plan amendment with modifications, but, upon deliberation, the hearing was continued. The LCPA was subsequently scheduled for Commission action at its July 9-13, 2007 hearing. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 3 The LCP amendment originally proposed changes to both the Land Use Plan (LUP)and the Implementation Plan (1P). On July 3, 2007, the City withdrew the IP portion of the LCPA. The Commission recognized the withdrawal of the IP amendment at its July 11, 2007 hearing. Also at its July 11, 2007 hearing, the Commission postponed action on suggested modifications for the LUP portion of the LCPA. At the November 14, 2007 hearing, the Commission approved the.proposed LUP amendment with suggested modifications as revised at that hearing. At the May 7, 2008 hearing the Commission adopted the revised findings with changes. Those changes are reflected herein. SUMMARY OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Section 30503 of the Coastal Act requires public input in Local Coastal Program development. During the preparation, approval, certification, and amendment of any local coastal program, the public, as well as all affected governmental agencies, including special districts, shall be provided maximum opportunities to participate. Prior to submission of a local coastal program for approval, local governments shall hold a public hearing or hearings on that portion of the program which has not been subjected to public hearings within four years of such submission. Prior to submittal of the LCPA to the Commission, the City held numerous public hearings on the proposed LCP amendment as shown on exhibit D. All City staff reports were made available for public review in the Planning Department and in the Huntington Beach Public Library. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners of record for the parcels that are the subject of the amendment as well as parcels within a 1,000 foot radius (including occupants), and notice of the public hearing was published in the Huntington Beach Independent, a local newspaper of general circulation. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Copies of the staff report are available online on the Coastal Commission's website at www.coastal:ca.gov or at the South Coast District office located in the ARCO Center Towers, 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000, Long Beach, 90802. To obtain copies of the staff report by mail, or for additional information, contact Meg Vaughn in the Long Beach office at (562) 590-5071. The City of Huntington Beach contact for this LCP amendment is Scott Hess, Director of Planning,who can be reached at (714)536-5271. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 4 I. RESOLUTION RESOLUTION TO CERTIFY WITH SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS: The Commission hereby certifies the Land Use Plan Amendment No. 1-06 for the City of Huntington Beach if modified as suggested and adopts the findings set forth below on the grounds that the Land Use Plan amendment with suggested modifications will meet the requirements of and be in conformity with the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. Certification of the land use plan amendment if mod'ified as suggested complies with the California Environmental Quality Act because either 1)feasible mitigation measures and/or alternatives have been incorporated to substantially lessen any significant adverse effects of the plan on the environment, or 2)there are no further feasible alternatives or mitigation measures that would substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts which the Land Use Plan Amendment may have on the environment. If. SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS Certification of City of Huntington Beach LCP Amendment Request No. 1-06 is subject to the following modifications. The City's existing language is shown in plain text. The City's proposed additions are shown in bold text. The City's proposed deletions are shown in plain text, strike ou The Commission staffs original (November 2007) suggested additions are shown in bold, italic, underlined text_ The Commission.staff's original (November 2007) suggested deletions are show in boki italic-, underlined, ctri4o mot MY Additions to the November 2007 staff recommendation made by the Commission at the public hearing are shown in bold. italic. double underlined text. Deletions to the November 2007 staff recommendation made by the Commission at the public hearing are shown in Staff Note: Three corrections are made where, due to typos, existing certified LUP language was left out. The corrections are: 1) replacing the word "residential" in suggested modification No. 1, 2) replacing the sub-section "Public" in the table in suggested modification No. 2, and, 3) inserting the hyphen in the land use category titles Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 5 Open Space-Conservation and Open Space- Parks throughout. LAND USE PLAN SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS: SUGGESTED MODIFICATION NO. 1 Sub-Area Descriptions and Land Use Plan The City's certified and proposed Land Use Plan (LUP) language, on page IV-C-11, under the heading: Zone 2-Bolsa Chica, shall be modified as follows: Existing Land Uses Inland (Pacific Coast Highway and areas north to the Coastal Zone boundary.) The majority of Zone 2, the Bolsa Chica, is located outside the City's corporate boundary, within the County of Orange. The area is in the City's Sphere of Influence ... A-44-50 acre area between Los-Ratos the residential development along Kenilworth Drive and the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Flood Control Channel is vaGant and includes a small section of the Bolsa Chica bluffs. Coastal (Seaward of Pacific Coast Highway) Coastal Element Land Use Plan Inland (Pacific Coast Highway and areas north to the Coastal Zone boundary.) The Coastal Element does not present a land use plan for the Bolsa Chica. The land area north of the Bolsa Chica, within the City's corporate and Coastal Zone boundaries, is built out consistent with its Coastal Element designation of low density residential. The area west of the Bolsa Chica is also developed consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use designation of low density residential and multi-family residential. ne)d to the Wintersburg Flood Control Channel r-etains its existing designation as an �Area- required,Prior to development of the site, an amendment to the Gity!s a amendment would take effeGt upon Commissien GeFtifiGatien. PGrtiens of this zone are Gaiden Grove Wintersbur-q Rood Control Channel was reGentfV GerIffiedd as RL 7 (Low De city Reside S rP aGe_ Daarbl /n addition, onr+r�vimA Sn Ge— Goneerrs+ziv oWienl w »T Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 6 The fifty(50) acre area (including the 5 acre area annexed by the City in 2004) adjacent to and immediately north of the East Garden Grove/Wintersbur_q Flood Control Channel and adjacent to and immediately west of Graham Street is land use designated Residential and Open Space—Conservation. (See Figure C-6a) There are wetlands, a Eucalyptus Grove that is an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area because it provides important raptor habitat, and buffer areasn�! at this site. These areas are designated Open Space— Conservation. The Wintersburq Channel Bikeway is identified at this site on the north levee of the flood control channel in the Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan, which is the regional bikeways plan for Orange County(See page IV-C-49 and fi_qure C-14). SUGGESTED.MODIFICATION No. 2 The table titled Zone 2 —Land Use Designations, on page IV-C-11, shall be modified as follows: Zone 2 —Land Use Designations Residential RL-T or RM or RH Open Space OS-P OS-S OS-C Public P ' !White Hele" Area Gf Deferred Certifiwation Zone 2 -Specific Plan Areas None Zone 2 —General Plan Overlays 4G,4J, 4K SUGGESTED MODIFICATION NO. 3 Figure C-6 of the City's Land Use Plan shall be modified to reflect the change in the City's corporate boundary and to accurately reflect the correct areas of the certified land use designations (Residential and Open Space Conservation)for the area. SUGGESTED MODIFICATION NO. 4 New Figure C-6a shall be added to the City's Land Use Plan, which shall be a land use plan of the Parkside site and shall depict the approved land use designations on the site as shown on 4T revised exhibit NN_ Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) _ Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 7 SUGGESTED MODIFICATION NO. 5 Add new subarea 4-K to table C-2 (Community District and Subarea Schedule) as depicted below: Subarea Characteristic Standards and Principles 4=K Permitted Uses Categories: Residential(R-L or R-M) Open Space Conservation (OS-C) See Figure C-6a Density/intensify Residential Maximum of fifteen (15) dwelling units per acre. Design and See R-gure C-6a Development A development plan for this area shall concentrate and cluster residential units in the noFtheastern portion of the site and include, consistent with the land use designations and Coastal Element policies, the following required information (all required information must be prepared or updated no more than one near prior to submittal of a coastal development permit application): 1. A Public Access Plan, including, but not limited to the following features: Class i Bikeway(paved off-road bikewaV; for use by bicyclists, walkers, joggers, roller skaters, and strollers) along the north levee of the flood control channel. If a wall between residential development and the Bikeway is allowed it shall include design features such as landscaped screening, non-linear footprint, decorative design elements and/or other features to soften the visual impact as viewed from the Bikeway. ❖ Public vista point with views toward the Bolsa Chica and ocean consistent with Coastal Element policies C 4.1.3, C 4.2.1, and C 4.2.3. ❖ All streets shall be un_gated, public streets available to the_general public for parking, vehicular, pedestrian, and bic c/e access. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 8 All public entry controls (e.q. _gates, gate/guard houses, _guards, signa_ge, etc.) and restrictions on use by the general public(e._g. preferential parking districts, resident-only parking periods/permits, etc.) associated with any streets or parking areas shall be prohibited. ❖ Public access trails to the Class I Bikeway, open space and to and within the subdivision, connectin_q with trails to the Bolsa Chica area and beach beyond. ❖ Public access si_gna_ge. ❖ When privacy walls associated with residential development are located adjacent to public areas they shall be placed on the private property, and visual impacts created by the walls shall be minimized through measures such as open fencing/wall design, landscaped screening, use of an undulating or off-set wall footprint, or decorative wall features (such as artistic imprints, etc.), or a combination of these measures 2. Habitat Management Plan for all ESHA, wetland, and buffer areas designated Open Space- Conservation that provides for their restoration and perpetual conservation and management. Issues to be addressed include, but are not limited to, methods to assure continuance of a water source to feed all wetland areas, enhancement of habitats and required buffer areas restoration and enhancement of wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitats and required buffer areas, and fuel modification requirements to address fire hazard and avoid disruption of habitat values in buffers. 3. Archaeological Research Design consistent with Policies C5.1.1 C5.1.2 C5.1.3 C5.1.4 and C5.1.5 of this Coastal Element. 4. Water Quality Management Program consistent with the Water and Marine Resources policies of this Coastal Element. If development of the parcel creates Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 9 significant amounts of directly connected impervious surface(more than 10%) or increases the volume and velocity of runoff from the site to adjacent coastal waters, the development shall include a treatment control BMP or suite of BMPs that will eliminate or minimize to the maximum extent practicable, dry weather flow generated by site development to adjacent coastal waters and treat runoff from at least the 85 percentile storm event based on the design criteria of the California Association of StormwaterAgencies MSQA) BMP handbooks, with at least a 24 hour detention time. Natural Treatment Systems such as wetland detention systems are preferred since they provide additional habitat beneFits, reliability and aesthetic values. 5. Pest Management Plan that, at a minimum, prohibits the use of rodenticides, and restricts the use of pesticides, and herbicides in outdoor areas, except necessary Vector Control conducted by the City or County. 6. Landscape Plan for non-Open Space Conservation areas that prohibits the planting, naturalization, or persistence of invasive plants, and encourages low- water use plants, and plants primarily native to coastal Orange County. 7. Biological Assessment of the entire site. 8. Wetland delineation of the entire site. 9. Domestic animal control plan that details methods to be used to prevent pets from entering the Open Space- Conservation areas. Methods to be used include, but are not limited to, appropriate fencing and barrier plantings. 10. Hazard Mitigation and Rood Protection Plan, including but not limited to, the following features: •:- Demonstration that site hazards including flood and liquefaction hazards are mitigated. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 10 Minimization/mitigation of flood hazard shall include the placement of a FEMA- certifiable, vegetated flood protection levee that achieves hazard mitigation _-ggoals and is the most protective of coastal resources including wetland and ESHA; ❖ Assurance of the continuance, restoration and enhancement of the wetlands and ESHA. Residential: Residential development, including appurtenant development such as roads and private open space, is not allowed within any wetland, ESHA, or required buffer areas and area designated Open Space- Conservation. Uses consistent with the Open Space-Parks designation'are allowed in the residential area. All development shall assure the continuance of the habitat value and function of preserved and restored wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat.areas within the area designated Open Space-Conservation. Open Space-Conservation: A. Wetlands: Only those uses described in Coastal Element Policy C 6.1.20 shall be allowed within existin_g and restored wetlands. All development shall assure the continuance of the habitat value and function of wetlands. Wetland Buffer Area: A buffer area is required along the perimeter of wetlands to provide a separation between development impacts and habitat areas and to function as transitional habitat. The buffer shall be of sufficient size to ensure the biological integrity and preservation of the wetland the buffer is desi ned to 12rotect. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 11 A minimum buffer width of 100 feet shall be established. Uses allowed within the wetland buffer are limited to: 1) those uses allowed within wetlands per Coastal Element PolicV C 6.1.20; 2) a vegetated flood protection levee is a potential allowable use if, due to siting and design constraints, location in the wetland buffer is unavoidable, and the levee is the most protective of coastal resources including wetland and ESHA; 3) No active park uses (e.g, tot lots, plaVinq fields, picnic tables, bike paths, etc.) shall be allowed within 100 feet of wetlands preserved in the Open Space Conservation area. B. Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas: Only uses dependent on the resource shall be allowed. Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHA) BufferAreas: A variable width buffer area is required along the perimeter of the ESHA and is required to be of sufficient size to ensure the biological integrity and preservation of the ESHA the buffer is designed to protect. A minimum buffer width of 297 to 650-Le-et shall be established between all residential development or active park use and raptor habitat within the eucalVptus_groves. Uses allowed within the ESHA buffer are limited to: 1) uses dependent on the resource; 2) wetland and upland habitat restoration and management; 3) ve_getated flood protection levee that is the most protective of coastal resources including wetland and ESHA- Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 12 4) within the northern prove ESHA buffer only-7 passive park use may be allowed if it is more than 150 feet from the ESHA, but only when it is outside all wetland and wetland buffer areas, and does not include any uses that would be disruptive to the ESHA. Uses allowed within the passive park areas shall be limited to.- a) nature trails and benches for passive recreation, education, and nature study: b) habitat enhancement, restoration. creation and management. 5 within the southern grove ESHA buffer only-a water quality Natural Treatment System may be allowed so long as it is located in an area that is most protective of coastal resources and at least 246 feet from the ESHA. J In addition to the 400=ieter required ESHA buffer described above, _gradin_q shall be prohibited within 500 feet of an occupied raptor nest durin_g the breeding season(considered to be from February 15 through August 31); &C. Habitat Management Plan shall be prepared.for all areas designated Open Space-Conservation which shall include restoration and enhancement of delineated wetlands, wetland and habitat mitigation, and establishment of appropriate buffers from development. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 13 D. Protective Fencing: Protective fencing or barriers shall be installed along any interface with developed areas, to deter human and pet entrance into all restored and preserved wetland and ESHA buffer areas. SUGGESTED MODIFICATION No. 6 On page IV-C-60 and IV-C-61, under the heading Visual Resources, The Bolsa Chica Mesas, revise to include visual resources within Parkside area as follows: The northwestern side of the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve includes bluffs that rise to an upland area known as the Bolsa Chica Mesa. These bluffs are primarily under the County's jurisdiction (only a small part of the bluff lies in the City) but are within the City's Sphere of Influence for potential future annexation. The mesas constitute a significant scenic resource within the City's coastal Zone. The 50 acre site (located west of and adjacent to Graham Street and north of and adjacent to the East Garden Grove Wintersbur9 Orange County flood Control Channel) known as the "Parkside"site affords an excellent opportunity to provide a public vista point. A public vista point in this location would provide excellent public views toward the Bolsa Chica and ocean. Use of the public vista point will be enhanced with construction of the Class I bike path along the flood control channel and public trails throughout the Parkside site. SUGGESTED MODIFICATION NO. 7 On page IV-C-70 add the following language in the first paragraph under the heading Environmentally Sensitive Habitats, to include reference to the wetland and Eucalyptus ESHA on the Parkside site: ... The City's Coastal Element identifies Ave three"environmentally sensitive habitat areas"within the City: 1) the Huntington Beach wetland areas, and 2)the California least tern nesting sanctuary, and 3) the wetlands and Eucalyptus ESHA on the Parkside site. (See Figure C-21 for location of No. 1 and 2). The Coastal Element includes policies to protect and enhance environmentally sensitive habitat areas in accordance with the Coastal Act. Also, on page IV-C-72 add the following new section describing,the Eucalyptus ESHA and wetlands on the Parkside site, after the paragraph titled California Least Tern Nesting Sanctuary: Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 14 Parkside Eucalyptus ESHA and Wetlands (See Fi_gure C 6a) Historically, this site was part of the extensive Bolsa Chica Wetlands system and was part of the Santa Ana RiverBolsa Chica complex. In the late 1890s the Bolsa Chica Gun Club completed a dam with tide _gates, which eliminated tidal influence, separating fresh water from salt water. In the 1930s, agricultural ditches began to limit fresh water on the site, and in 1959, the East Garden Grove-Wintersbur_q Flood Control Channel isolated the site hydrologically. Nevertheless, wetland areas remain present at the site. There are existing and previously delineated wetlands, and areas that have been filled without authorization and are capable of being restored. These areas as well as their buffer areas are designated Open Space- Conservation, and uses allowed within these areas are limited. In addition, on the site's southwestern boundary, at the base of the bluff, is a line of Eucalyptus trees that continues offsite to the west These trees are used by raptors for nesting, roosting, and as a base from which to forage. The trees within this "eucalyptus_-grove"within or adlacent to the subiect site's western boundary constitute an environmentally sensitive habitat area (ESHA) due to the important ecosystem functions they provide to a suite of raptor species. The Eucalyptus trees along the southern edge of the Bolsa Chica mesa are used for perching, roosting, or nesting by at least 12 of the 17 species of raptors that are known to occur at Bolsa Chica. Although it is known as the "eucalyptus grove" it also includes several palm trees and pine trees that are also used by raptors and herons. None of the trees are part of a native plant community. Nevertheless, this eucalyptus _grove has been recognized as ESHA bV multiple agencies since the late 1970's (USFWS, 1979; CDFG 1982, 1985) not because it is part of a native ecosystem, or because the trees in and of themselves warrant protection, but because of the important ecosystem functions it provides. Some of the raptors known to use the grove include the white tailed kite, sharp-shinned hawk, Cooper's hawk, and osprey. Many of these species are dependent on both the Bolsa Chica wetlands and the nearby upland areas for their food. These Eucalyptus trees were recognized as ESHA by the Coastal Commission prior to its 2006 certification of this section of this LCP, most recentiV in the context of the Coastal Commission's approval of the adjacent Bri_ghtwater development(coastal development permit 5-05-020). The Eucalyptus grove in the northwest corner of the site, although separated from the rest of the trees by a gap of about 650 feet, provides the same types of ecological functions aondees as do the rest of the trees borderin_q the mesa. At least ten species of raptors have been observed in this_-grove and Cooper's hawks, a California Species of Special Concern, nested there in 2005 and 2006. Due to the important ecosystem functions of providing perchinq, roosting and nesting opportunities for a variety of raptors, these trees also constitute ESHA. These areas as well as their buffer areas and int as are designated Open Space-Conservation, and uses allowed within these areas are limited Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 15 The wetlands, Eucalyptus ESHA areas, and buffer areas ' , are designated Open Space-Conservation to assure they are adequately protected. SUGGESTED MODIFICATION NO. 8 Add the following policy to the certified Land Use Plan, on page IV-C-100 as new policy C 1.1.3a: C 1.1.3a The provision of public access and recreation benefits associated with private development(such as but not limited to public access ways, public bike paths, habitat restoration and enhancement, etc.) shall be phased such that the public benefits) are in place prior to or concurrent with the private development but not later than occupation of any of the private development SUGGESTED MODIFICATION NO. 9 Add the following policy to the certified Land Use Plan, on page IV-C-105 as new policy C 2.4.7: C 2.4.7 The streets of new residential subdivisions between the sea and the first public road shall be constructed and maintained as open to the_general public for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian access. General public Parking shall be provided on all streets throughout the entire subdivision. Private entrance grates and private streets shall be prohibited. All public entry controls (e.-g. _gates, _-gaWguard houses, _-gguards, si_-gna_ge, etc.) and restrictions on use by the_-ggeneral public (e.q. preferential parking districts, resident-only parking periods/permits, etc.) associated with any streets or parking areas shall be prohibited. SUGGESTED MODIFICATION NO. 10 Modify the following existing LUP Water and Marine Resources policies as follows: C 6.1.6 (modify third and fourth paragraph) The City shall require that new development and redevelopment, as appropriate, employ nonstructural Best Management Practices (BMPs) and structural BMPs designed to Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 16 minimize the volume, velocity and pollutant load of stormwater runoff, prior to runoff discharge into stormwater conveyance systems, receiving waters and/or other sensitive areas. All development shall include effective site design and source control BMPs. When the combination of site design and source control BMPs is not sufficient to protect water quality, structural treatment BMPs along with site design and source control measures shall be required. BMPs should be selected based on efficacy at mitigating pollutants of concern associated with respective development types. To this end, the City shall continue implementation of the Municipal Stormwater National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NDPES) standards prG ram permit(Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. R8- 2002-0010, dated January 18, 2002, or any amendment to or re-issuance thereof) of which the City is a co-permittee with the County of Orange through the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Per program parameters, continue to require a Water Quality Management Plan for all applicable new development and redevelopment in the Coastal Zone, ... C 6.1.16 Encourage the Orange County Sanitation District to accept dry weather nuisance flows into the sewer treatment system prior to discharge. New developments shall be designed and constructed to minimize or eliminate dry weather nuisance flows to the maximum extent practicable. C 6.1.25 Require that new development and redevelopment minimize the creation of impervious areas,especially directly connected impervious areas, and,where feasible, reduce the extent of existing unnecessary impervious areas, and incorporate adequate mitigation to minimize the alteration of natural streams and/or interference with surface water flow. The use of permeable materials for roads, sidewalks and other paved areas shall be incorporated into new development to the maximum extent practicable. Add new policy C 6.1.30 Natural or vegetated treatment systems (e.g. bio-swales, vegetative buffers, constructed or artificial wetlands) that mimic natural drainage patterns are preferred for new developments over mechanical treatment systems or BMPs (e.g. water quality treatment plants, storm drain inlet filters). Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 17 SUGGESTED MODIFICATION NO. 11 Add the following policy to the certified Land Use Plan, on page IV-C-123, as new policy C 7.2.7 Any areas that constituted wetlands or ESHA that have been removed, altered, tilled or degraded as the result of activities carried out without compliance with Coastal Act requirements shall be protected as required by .the policies in this Land Use Plan. 111. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT WITH SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS The following findings support the Commission's action of November 14, 2006 approving Land Use Plan amendment 1-06 if modified as suggested. Changes to the findings contained in the staff recommendation dated November 1,%2007 necessary to reflect the Commission's action are indicated as follows: Language added as a result of the Commission's action is shown in bold, italic. double underline. Language deleted as a result of the Commission's action is shown in , ' , The Commission hereby finds and declares as follows: A. Land Use Plan Amendment Description The proposed Local Coastal Program (LCP) amendment is a project-specific amendment designed to make possible a low density residential development up to a maximum 7 dwelling units per acre(dua) on a vacant, approximately 50-acre site comprising two legal lots, most of which is currently in agricultural production. Most of the site is currently uncertified, and the proposed LUP amendment would incorporate those areas into the City's existing LUP and establish land use designations for those areas as well as for the currently certified parts of the site. The geographic area that is the subject of this proposed LUP amendment can be divided into three areas. See Exhibit C4. The largest section is an area of the City that was deferred certification by the Commission at the time the City's Land Use Plan (LUP)was originally certified, in 1982, and that deferral carried through to the eventual LCP certification in 1985. The area of deferred certification (ADC)is approximately 40 acres.' The staff report and Commission findings from the 1982 LUP certification are not entirely clear about how much area was deferred certification_ However,the City has clearly depicted the area subject to this LCP amendment(through the Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 18 This amendment request proposes to certify this area by bringing it within the City's existing LUP and applying land use designations to the area. Just northwest of the ADC is a 5 acre area that is currently certified (see footnote 1)and designated Open Space-Parks. The City has resubmitted this area for certification with the same designations. Finally, there is a five acre area southwest of the ADC that was under the jurisdiction of the County of Orange until it was annexed by the City in 2004. Like the ADC, the City proposed to certify that area by bringing it within the broader City LUP,and land use designations are proposed for this area as well. The proposed amendment would allow the majority of the site to be developed with low density residential development, and would also set aside a portion of the site for open space uses including parks and conservation. The amendment does not propose to create any new land use designations that are not already used in the existing LUP. Each of the land use designations proposed already exist within the certified Land Use Plan (LUP). The land use designations that are proposed to be applied at the subject site have been applied elsewhere within the City's certified LUP. However, because the site is an area of deferred certification or was recently annexed, no land use designation has ever been approved by the Commission at the subject site (with the exception of the 5 acre area designated and zoned Open Space- Parks). The current zoning of approximately 38 acres of the site is Residential Low Density, which has not been certified by the Commission. Specifically, the amendment request proposes the following land use designations (see exhibit C): Land Acres Use RL - 7 Low Density Residential-Maximum 7 units per acre 38.4 acres OS-P Open Space-Park 8.2 acres OS-C Open Space-Conservation 3.3 acres As stated, the area of deferred certification is forty acres and the former County parcel is five acres. In addition to the 45 acre area,the.City has also included in this amendment the five acre area that was not deferred certification. The certified area totals approximately 5 acres and is land use designated and zoned Open Space—Parks_ Most of the certified five acre parcel is slope area and not usable as an active park area. The proposed amendment would retain that land use, and would expand that designation into the formerly deferred area, for a total of 8.2 acres of Open Space-Parks. This five acre segment brings the total size of the subject site to 50 acres (40 acre ADC, 5 acre former County parcel, 5 acre certified area). exhibit to its resolution)and clearly"resubmitted"any portions of that area that may currently be certified. For purposes of this staff report,we refer to the uncertified area as being 40 acres,and the acreage of the other areas subject to this LUP amendment are calculated accordingly. However,if the City does not accept the Commission's certification with suggested modifications,and the current status quo remains,the Commission does not,by these descriptions,take any position on the issue of what area is currently certified and what area is ADC. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 19 Of the approximately 5 acre former County area, 1.7 acres are proposed to become low density residential and 3.3 acres are proposed to become Open Space—Conservation (these figures are included within the totals in the chart above). In addition to establishing land use designations for the subject site, the amendment also proposes text changes to the LUP. The certified LUP includes a section of area-by-area descriptions. In this section of the LUP, the acreage figure is proposed to be changed to reflect the annexation of the former County parcel (from the current 44 acre figure to the proposed 50 acre figure). In addition, language describing the area as vacant and an area of deferred certification is proposed to be replaced with the following language: The Coastal Element land use designation for the vacant 45 acre area next to the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel was recently certified as RL-7(Low Density Residential) and OS-P(Open Space—Park). In addition, approximately 5 acres of land was annexed from the County of Orange into the City of Huntington Beach. This area is designated RL-7(Low Density Residential) and OS— C (Open Space— Conservation). The subject area is currently comprised of two parcels: one 45 acre parcel (historic City parcel)and one 5 acre parcel (former County parcel). B. Site Description and History The site address is 17301 Graham Street, Huntington Beach, Orange County. It is bounded by Graham Street to the east, East Garden Grove Wintersburg Flood Control Channel (EGGWFCC)to the south, unincorporated Bolsa Chica area to the west, and existing residential uses.to the north (along Kenilworth Drive). The development to the north is located within the City. The land to the north and to the east of the project is located outside the coastal zone. The areas located east of Graham Street, south of the EGGWFCC, and immediately north of the subject site along Kennilworth Drive are all developed with low density residential uses. To the northwest, a multi-family condominium development, Cabo del Mar, exists. To the west of the subject site, are undeveloped properties known as the Goodell property and Signal Landmark property. To the southwest of the subject site lies the Bolsa Chica wetlands restoration area. The 3.3 acre.area on the subject site proposed to be land use designated Open Space-Conservation is adjacent to the wetlands restoration area. West of the Goodell property is the site of the recently approved Bdghtwater development for 349 residential units (coastal development permit 5- 05-020). The 130ghtwater site, the Goodell property, and the Signal Landmark property are located on the Bolsa Chica mesa. The majority of the subject site has been more or less continuously farmed since at least the 1950s. The majority of the site is roughly flat with elevations ranging from about 0.5 foot below Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 20 mean sea level to approximately 2 feet above mean sea level. The western portion of the site is a bluff that rises to approximately 47 feet above sea level. Also, generally near the mid-point of the southerly property line is a mound with a height of just under ten feet. The EGGWFCC levee at the southern border is approximately 12 feet above mean sea level. Historically, the site was part of the extensive Bolsa Chica Wetlands system. In the southwest corner of the site, on the former County parcel, the City, property owner and Commission are in agreement that an approximately 0.45 acre wetland is present. In the 1980s, as part of the review of the County's proposed LUP for the Bolsa Chica, the Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) in the document titled "Determination of the Status of Bolsa Chica wetlands" (as amended April 16, 1982), identified this area as "severely degraded historic wetland—not presently functioning as wetland", and considered it within the context of the entire Bolsa Chica wetland system. Also, in 1989, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) published its delineation of an approximately 8 acre wetland area in the northwest area of the site, near the base of the bluff. At the time of the EPA delineation, the area was being farmed. The topography of the agricultural field has been significantly altered since about 1998. As a result, the area delineated by EPA no longer is inundated or saturated for long periods except during exceptionally wet years. Water now tends to inundate an area near the flood control channel (designated "WP") and an area at the base of the western bluff(designated "AP"), both of which were hampiwen identified as wetlands by the Commission's staff ecologist. Howe ver. the Commission found at its November 14, 2007 meeting that the WP is not wet enough long enough to result in the formation of hydric soils and does not exhibit sufficient hydrology that would support a predominance of hydrophvtes in most years. The City and property owner do not contest designation of the AP as wetland. In addition, on the site's western boundary, generally along the base of the bluff, are two groves of Eucalyptus trees. The trees are used by raptors for nesting, roosting, and as a .base from which to forage. At the time the City's LUP was first considered for certification, in 1981, the Commission denied certification, in part because the City proposed low density residential land use designation for-the site that is the subject of the present amendment request and the Commission found the site to contain wetlands. The City re-submitted the LUP in 1982, but it made no change to the proposed low density residential land use designation for the subject site. Once again, the Coastal Commission in its action on the City's proposed Land Use Plan, denied the certification for the MWD site (as the subject site was previously known), finding that it did contain wetland resources and that the designation of this parcel was an integral part of the ultimate land use and restoration program for the Bolsa Chica. The Commission findings for denial of the LUP for this area note the importance of this area in relation to the Bolsa Chica LCP. Of the 3.3 acres proposed to be.Open Space -Conservation, none is located within the 40 acre area that was deferred certification. The site was being farmed at the time of the Commission's denial of the low Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 21 density residential land use designation for the subject site. A related coastal development permit application had been submitted for the subject site, 5-06-327 Shea Homes, but that application has since been withdrawn similar to prior applications (previously submitted and then withdrawn were application Nos. 5-06-021, 5- 05-256 and 5-03-029 for the same development proposal), as well as an appeal of a City permit for the certified area (A-5-HNB-02-376). The appealed action remains pending, but the applicant waived the deadline for the Commission to act on the appeal. The Commission anticipates acting on the appeal in conjunction with a future permit application. The permit application and appeal request subdivision of the site to accommodate 170 single family residences, construction of the residences and associated infrastructure, preservation of the wetland identified on the former County parcel, and dedication and grading of active public park area. C. LCP History The LCP for the City of Huntington Beach, minus two geographic areas, was effectively certified in March 1985. The two geographic areas that were deferred certification were the bulk of the subject site (known at that time as the MWD site—see footnote 1), and an area inland of Pacific Coast Highway between Beach Boulevard and the Santa Ana River mouth (known as the PCH ADC). The subject site is northeast of the Bolsa Chica LCP area. At the time certification was deferred, the subject area was owned by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). The site has since been sold by MWD and is currently owned by Shea Homes. Both of the ADCs were deferred certification due to unresolved wetland protection issues. Certification of the subject site was also deferred due to concerns that it might be better utilized for coastal-dependent industrial facilities, since MWD at that time had a "transmission corridor" parcel within the Bolsa Chica Lowlands that it indicated could be used to connect seawater intake facilities located offshore to facilities located on its switchyard parcel in the.City of Huntington Beach, through the subject parcel. This is no longer a possibility, since the State has taken over the lowlands, and given the development of the areas surrounding the subject parcel since 1982 (and pending development that has already been approved), this site is no longer appropriate for coastal dependent industry. The PCH ADC was certified by the Commission in 1995. The wetland areas of that former ADC are.land use designated Open Space—Conservation and zoned Coastal Conservation. No portion of the former PCH ADC is part of the current amendment request. A comprehensive update to the City's LUP was certified by the Commission on June 14, 2001 via Huntington Beach LCP amendment 3-99. The City also updated the Implementation Plan by replacing it with the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (while retaining existing specific plans for areas located within the Coastal Zone without changes). The updated Implementation Plan was certified by the Coastal Commission in April 1996 via LCP amendment 1-95. Both the LUP update and the IP update maintained Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 22 the subject site as an area of deferred certification. This LCP amendment was originally submitted as LCPA No. 2-02. LCPA 2-02 was subsequently withdrawn and re-submitted as LCPA 1-05. LCPA 1-05 was also withdrawn and re-submitted. The current amendment, LCPA 1-06 is the most recent submittal of the same amendment. No changes have been made to the amendment proposal during any of the withdrawal and re-submittals. The withdrawal and re-submittals were done in order to provide the property owner additional time to prepare and submit additional information regarding the presence of wetlands on-site and the use of the eucalyptus grove by raptors, and to allow Commission staff adequate time to review the additional information. LCPA 1-06 was received on April 13, 2006. On June 13, 2006, the Commission granted an extension of the time limit to act on LCPA No. 1-06 for a period not to exceed one year. Sa., ,r.,.,,i/;.... F. /+ ..a / C" AL. 1 06 : W 12 9AAO On May 10. 2007. the Commission voted to deny the subject Land Use Plan amendment. as submitted. A motion (i.e. the main motion) was made to approve the Land Use Plan amendment with modifications but upon deliberation, the hearing was continued. The LCPA was subsequently scheduled for Commission action at its Ju1v 9-13. 2007 hearing. The LCP amendment originally proposed changes to both the Land Use Plan (LUP)and the Implementation Plan U). On July 3. 2007, the city withdrew the IP portion of the LCPA. The Commission recognized the withdrawal of the IP amendment at its July 11, 2007 hearing. Also at its July 11, 2007 hearing. the Commission postponed action on suggested modifications for the LUP portion of the LCPA. At its November 14, 2007 meeting, the Commission approved the LUP amendment with suggested modifications. On April 10, 2008, the Commission granted an extension of the time limit for the City to act on suggested modifications to the LCPA. D. Land Use Plan Format The City's certified Land Use Plan includes a section of Goals, Objectives and Policies. These are organized by specific resources, including headings such as Land Use, Shoreline and Coastal Resource Access, and Recreational and Visitor Serving Facilities, among many others. These are the certified policies that apply City—wide within the coastal zone. Another section of the certified LUP is the Technical Synopsis. The Technical Synopsis is an area-by-area description of each segment of the City's coastal zone. This section includes the descriptions of the existing land use designations. It also includes,after a narrative description of the sub-areas, Table C-2..Table C-2 is titled "Community District and Sub-area Schedule"and it provides greater specificity of what is allowed and encouraged within each subdistrict. This greater level of specificity provides a more detailed, site specific description than would be provided if the land use designation or general policies were considered alone. Table C-2 provides language on how general policies and designations would apply to specific sub areas of the coastal zone. Taken all together, these work well as the standard for development in the coastal zone. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 23 The format of the suggested modifications applies this same structure to the amendment site. Many of the issues addressed by suggested modifications would be required by the general LUP policies, but, consistent with the format of the LUP, the suggested modifications are intended to provide a greater level of detail that applies to the specific circumstances of the subject site. For example, although the City's public access policies may be adequate to require a bike path along the EGGWFCC levee, the LUP format calls the reader's attention to the fact that, at this particular site, a bike path is appropriate and is therefore being required in this amendment. If one were working from the policies alone, some opportunities at certain sites may not be recognized. The LUP's existing format significantly maximizes the protection of resources within the coastal zone. The suggested modifications carry out that same format in order to assure protection of resources at the amendment site. E. Approval of the Land Use Plan Amendment if Modified 1. Incorporation of Findings for Denial of Land Use Plan as Submitted The findings for denial of the Land Use Plan as submitted are incorporated as if fully set forth herein. The Commission denied the LUPA as submitted at the Commission's May 10, 2007 hearing. The findings for denial of the LUPA as submitted that were provided in the May 2007 recommendation are found in Attachment A, attached to this staff report 2. Wetland The proposed amendment includes an Open Space Conservation designation on a 3.3 acre area within the former County parcel. The 3.3 acre area includes an undisputed wetland area (see 3`d revised exhibit NN). The proposed Conservation designation is appropriate for this area. However, additional wetland areas exist at the subject site that are not proposed to be protected with the Open Space Conservation (OSC)designation and are addressed in the following findings. Wetlands often provide critical habitat, nesting sites, and foraging areas for many species, some of which are threatened or endangered. In addition, wetlands can serve as natural filtering mechanisms to help remove pollutants from storm runoff before the runoff enters into streams and rivers leading to the ocean. Further, wetlands can serve as natural flood retention areas. Another critical reason for preserving, expanding, and enhancing Southern California's remaining wetlands is because of their scarcity. As much as 75% of coastal wetlands in southern California have been lost, and, statewide up to 91% of wetlands have been lost. Section 30121 of the Coastal Act states: Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 24 "Wetland"means lands within the coastal zone which maybe covered periodically or permanently with shallow water and include saltwater marshes, freshwater marshes, open or closed brackish water marshes, swamps, mudflats, and fens. The Commission has further specified how wetlands are to be identified through regulations and guidance documents. Section 13577(b)(1) of the Commission's regulations states, in pertinent part: Wetlands shall be defined as land where the water table is at, near, or above the land surface long enough to promote the formation of hydric soils or to support the growth of hydrophytes ... For purposes of this section, the upland limit of a wetland shall be defined as: (A) the boundary between land with predominantly hydrophytc cover and land with predominantly mesophytic or xerophytic cover, (B) the boundary between soil that is predominantly hydric and soil that is predominantly nonhydric;or (C)in the case of wetlands without vegetation or soils, the boundary between land that is flooded or saturated at some time during years of normal precipitation, and land that is not Section 30231 of the Coastal Act states, in pertinent part: The biological productivity and the quality of... wetlands:... appropriate to maintain optimum populations of marine organisms and for the protection of human health shall be maintained and, where feasible, restored through, among other means, _.. preventing depletion of ground water supplies and substantial interference with surface water flow, maintaining natural vegetation buffer areas that protect riparian habitats, ... Section 30233(a)of the Coastal Act states: The diking, filling,_or dredging of open coastal waters, wetlands, estuaries, and lakes shall be permitted in accordance with other applicable provisions of this division, where there is no feasible less environmentally damaging alternative, and where feasible mitigation measures have been provided to minimize adverse environmental effects, and shall be limited to the following: 9) New or expanded port, energy, and coastal-dependent industrial facilities, including commercial fishing facilities. 2) Maintaining existing, or restoring previously dredged, depths in existing navigational channels, turning basins, vessel berthing and mooring areas, and boat launching ramps. 3) In open coastal waters, other than wetlands, including streams, estuaries, Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 25 and lakes, new or expanded boating facilities and the placement of structural pilings for public recreational piers that provide public access and recreational opportunities. 4) Incidental public service purposes, including but not limited to, burying cables and pipes or inspection of piers and maintenance of existing intake and outfall lines. 5) Mineral extraction, including sand for restoring beaches, except in environmentally sensitive areas. 6) Restoration purposes. 7) Nature study, aquaculture, or similar resource dependent activities. Section 30250 of the Coastal Act states, in pertinent part: (a) New residential ... development ... shall be located ... where it will not have significant adverse effects, either individually or cumulatively, on coastal resources. In addition, the City's LUP includes Policy C 6.1.20, which limits filling of wetlands to the spec activities outlined in Section 30233 of the Coastal Act. And LUP policy C 7.1.4 states, in pertinent part: "Require that new development contiguous to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitat areas include buffer zones." The Coastal Commission staff ecologist has reviewed considerable amounts of information regarding the extent.of wetlands at the site, much of which are listed in his memorandum which is attached as Exhibit K. The property owner has submitted numerous documents intended to demonstrate that there are no wetlands on site, beyond the wetlands recognized on the former County parcel (i.e. the CP wetlands). Local citizens have .submitted documents intended to demonstrate that there are significantly more wetlands on site than that recognized in the CP wetlands. These citizens are concerned by the prospect that development may be allowed to occur within wetlands at the site if the LUP amendment were approved as submitted (and as reflected in the.related coastal development permit application 5-06-327, Shea Homes, and appeal A-5-HNB-02-376). In addition, the staff ecologist has reviewed historical information regarding the subject site and surrounding area. All this information has been reviewed by the staff ecologist and is considered in his memoranda attached as Exhibits K, LLL, and QQQ to this staff report and are hereby incorporated into these findings in their entirety. The Commission's Mapping/GIS Program Manager has also reviewed numerous historic and more recent aerial photographs and topographical information. The purpose of the Mapping/GIS Program Manager's review was to identify changes due to landform alterations such as grading and filling, and to attempt to delineate disturbed areas dating from the time the Coastal Commission's jurisdiction began at the project site (1/1177). The results of his review are reflected in his memoranda dated 7/2/07 and 10/25/07, attached as exhibits MMM and RRR of this staff report and which are hereby incorporated into these findings in their entirety. 0 Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 26 In brief summary, results of the review of the aerial photos and topographic maps indicates that topography has changed on site, particularly in the area delineated by the EPA as wetlands in their 1989 publication (generally in the northwest area of the site). Changes are also identified in the area of the former equestrian facility(generally in the southwestern portion of the site between the CP and WP wl areas). However, at its November 14, 2007 hearing, the Commission found, based on evidence presented. that no wetlands exist in the WP area. In the aerial photo taken on May 21, 1970, the western extension of Slater Avenue is visible just north of the flood control channel embankment on the subject property. The 1970 photo establishes a pre-Proposition 20, pre-Coastal Act baseline for gauging the extent of land alterations and other changes that occurred later(post Coastal Act, 111/77). A clearly distinguishable topographic depression in the area of the EPA wetlands is depicted on topographic maps from 1970, 1980, and 1996. However, by 2005 that depression was no longer present in the same configuration. The lowest area had been displaced to the west abutting the base of the mesa and the historic EPA wetland area had been relatively flattened. In the area of the former equestrian facility, the aerial photos and topographic maps also show disturbance. In the images from 1981 on, fill is evident in the area that was developed as an equestrian facility. It appears that fill first appears in conjunction with establishment of the equestrian facility, with additional fill being placed over the life of the facility. The extent of fill has migrated, primarily to the north, but also, to some extent, to the southwest. E*!r4&;4wWP and AP Areas 44WhwWs- With regard to existing wetlands, based on his review of the available data, the Commission's staff ecologist determined that additional wetland areas exist at the subject site. The Commission's staff ecologist considered first questions of whether additional wetland areas exist at two specific areas of the subject site. The results of the staff ecologist's review regarding the presence of additional wetland at the two specific sites (described below as areas AP and WP) are reflected in his Memorandum, dated 7/27/06, attached as exhibit K to this staff report. For the reasons listed in that memorandum and below, the Commission concurs and adopts its ecologist's conclusions with regard to the area known as the Agricultural Pond (AP) +16^_-„ +...-a Nfis a ai; of^^dffiem'F Wandg. Th&4Two specific areas a were evaluated for the presence of additional wetland area. The two sites are referred to as the Wintersburg Pond or WP, which is adjacent to the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Flood Control Channel (EGGWFCC) levee along the southern edge of the site; and the Agricultural Pond or AP, located near the base of the bluff along the western edge of the property. The proposed LUP amendment would designate these wetland areas Low Density Residential and Open Space-Parks. These land use designations allow grading, and the construction of houses, roads, and active parks, which wcould necessitate the dredging and filling of the wetlands if wetlands are present in these areas. Such uses within wetlands are inconsistent with Section 30233 of the Coastal Act and with LUP Policy C 6.1.20 which limits filling of Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 27 wetlands to the specific activities outlined in Coastal Act Section 30233. The memorandum dated July 27, 2006 from the Commission's staff ecologist states: "The available data suggest that portions of the agricultural field ... are inundated or saturated at a frequency and duration sufficient to support a preponderance of wetland plant species ... Such areas meet the definition of wetlands under the Coastal Act and the Commission's Regulations." There are three factors or"parameters"that are used to determine whether or not a wetland exists: the presence of hydrophytc vegetation, the presence of hydric soils, and the presence of wetland hydrology. The Commission finds an area to be wetland if any one of the three parameters is present. Usually, the presence or absence of hydrophytes or hydric soils is sufficient to determine whether a wetland exists. However,-those two indicators are not necessary, as they do not actually define a wetland. Rather, an area is defined as a wetland based on whether it is wet enough long enough that it would support either of those two indicators. Therefore, the removal of vegetation by permitted activities does not change a wetland to upland. Section 30121 of the Coastal Act provides the statutory definition of wetlands: "...lands within the coastal zone which may be covered periodically or permanently with shallow water and include saltwater marshes, freshwater marshes ..." Section 13577(b)(1) of the California Code of Regulations provides the regulatory definition of wetlands: "... land where the water table is at,near,or above the land surface long enough to promote the formation of hydric soils or to support the growth of hydrophytes" Thus, the Coastal Act and the Regulations provide that a determination of the presence of wetlands may be made based on whether an area demonstrates the presence of sufficient water to promote hydric soils or to support hydrophytes, whether or not the soils and vegetation are present under existing conditions. Because this area was historically a salt marsh and because the site has been historically farmed and continues to be farmed as of the adoption of these findings, the typically used field indicators cannot be relied upon. The grading and repeated discing and plowing associated with the existing agricultural use destroys hydric soil features and prevents the development of natural vegetation. The evidence presented in the ecologist's memo and summarized below-&des su s that the AP and WP areas are wet enough long enough to"support the growth" of hydophytes. T4ufs If so, the WP and AP areas would meets the definition of wetlands contained in the Commission's regulations. The WP and AP would also meets the Coastal Act definition of wetlands if they are in4his"periodically covered in shallow water." However, based on all the evidence presented(including the memoranda prepared by Commission staffff, information submitted by the Cit6 the property owner, the public, and public testimony) the Commission found that the area of the WP is not wet enough Jong enough or frequently enough for the development of a preponderance of h drophytic vegetation or hydric soils. Therefore. the Commission finds that the area known as WP is not a wetland Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 28 The wetland conclusion is based on two lines of evidence: (1) an examination of the vegetation at a nearby location that is similar in history, physical characteristics, and hydrology to the depressions in the agricultural field,2 and (2)an informed estimate of the frequency and duration of continuous inundation at various sites. Areas WP and AP were matched by the Commission's staff ecologist, with wetland areas on the County parcel that were similar in elevation and topography. Inundation in the agricultural and AP and at the reference wetlands was similar in pattern, further suggesting that the latter is a good proxy for the former. Therefore, since the dominant vegetation at the reference areas is mostly comprised of wetland species, it is reasonable to expect that the agricultural areal AP would also support a predominance of hydrophytes in the absence of farming (i.e. that thane it is wet enough Iona enoua►h and frequently enough to support such vegetation). Although, prior to about 1990, inundation hadn't been apparent in the depression adjacent to the EGGWFCC (WP area) and inundation occurred there less frequently than in the area of the AP; in recent years, the Commission considered omWearie information regardina whether the exists tn shwic tha WP is inundated for long duration following significant rainfall. Weighing the conflicting information submitted. the Commission found that the WP was not inundated for Iona duration following significant rainfall. Establishing the extent of wetlands at the site, given its history of farming and disturbance, is not straightforward. The best approach for this site regarding WP and AP known to the Commission at this time is to base the wetland boundary on current conditions as inferred from recent topography and the available photographs of recent inundation. EPA Delineated Wetland (1989) Prior to about 1990, it appears from aerial photographs that significant inundation was generally confined to the area delineated as wetland (just east of the area of the AP)by the EPA in its 1989 publication. Based on analysis of aerial photographs dating from 1958 to 1985, the property owner's biological consultant concluded that inundation in that area tended to have a different footprint in different years and, based on this observation, he s In the second to last footnote in Dr.Dixon's memo,he notes that the topography of the reference site is actually similar to that of WP as it existed in 2003,not at present. More recently a box plough was used to fill area WP,which is apparent in 2006 topographic maps_ The box plough fill is under investigation by Commission staff as an alleged violation. Accordingly,relying on the topography prior to the alleged violation yields.the appropriate comparison. Additionally,the hydrology section of Dr.Dixon's memo states that LSA biologists stated that WP didn't pond until after about 1973. However,if this is due to changes in topography that occurred before 1973,it is again appropriate to focus on the post-1973 topography,as that represents current conditions. Conditions prior to 1973 may be irrelevant if topographical conditions changed prior to 1973,as such changes were pre-Coastal Act and therefore not Coastal Act violations. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 29 argued that no particular area should be identified as a wetland. However, all his estimated wetland polygons in the western portion of the agricultural field appear to fall within the area delineated by the EPA. In the absence of wetland vegetation, the drawing of wetland boundaries is an approximate exercise based on a small and haphazard collection of aerial photographs or ground observations and estimates of topography. Given the approximate nature of such delineations, it appears the consultant's results are actually additional evidence that the EPA delineation was reasonable at the time it was made. However, it appears that the area of the EPA delineation (8.3 acres)was based on extra-normal site circumstances. As described in the October 25, 2007 memorandum prepared by the Commission's staff ecologist, the 8.3 acre estimate of the wetland size appears to have been based largely on observations made during the period when increased runoff from off-site was temporarily directed onto the subject site. This appears to have occurred during the construction of the Cabo del Mar condominiums on the adjacent property from sometime after 1978 until sometime before 1986. If one considers the area delineated by EPA under normal conditions (i.e. no excess off site drainage directed on-site), a more likely estimate for the wetland area can be made. Based on the Bilhom (1987)and EPA (1989)estimates of wetland area during the period of construction of the Cabo del Mar condominiums, estimates of water availability during the period of interest, and the estimated size of ponded areas in available photographs, a reasonable estimate of the average area that ponded is 4.0 acres. The 1987 and 1989 studies by Bilhorn and EPA were based on field work done prior to 1987. The October 25, 2007 memorandum is attached to this staff report as exhibit QQQ and is hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. As discussed in detail below, the EPA wetland is no longer present. Existing CP Wetland Substantial evidence suggests that the wetland area of the CP is larger than what has been recognized in the LCP amendment submittal. The wetland area recognized by the City and property owner on what is known as the former County parcel totals 0.45 acres. However, additional CP area should be included in the CP wetland acreage. This wetland area was filled without authorization from the Commission. In a letter dated 9/7/82 from the Department of Fish and Game (DFG)to Coastal Commission staff, the DFG determined the area, prior to placement of the unpermitted fill, to be wetlands, and recommended removal of the fill and revegetation (see exhibit BBB). Pursuant to Coastal Development Permit No. 5-82-278,the unpermitted fill was to have been removed and the area revegetated. Based on comparison of topographic(1980)and vegetation maps (Vegetation Communities, Exhibit 26 of the Bolsa Chica Land Use Plan, dated January 1982) created before the unpermitted fill was placed,with topographic maps (1986 and 1982)created subsequent to the time the fill was placed, the elevation of the subject area was increased by at least 2 feet. Because of the unpermitted fill, the pickleweed within the filled area was no longer viable. Development approved pursuant to Coastal Development Permit 5-82- Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 30 278 included removal of the unpermitted fill to an elevation of approximately three inches below the grade of the existing adjacent pickleweed stand [area of the recognized CP wetland] and revegetation of the area with one or more of the following species: pickleweed, spiny rush,frankenia, sea lavender, and shoregrass. However, elevations in the fill area are not consistent with pre-fill elevations. Rather, topographic maps prepared subsequent to the unpermitted fill and subsequent to the issuance of Permit 5-82-278 depict the fill area at an elevation at least two feet above the adjacent CP wetland. This leads to the conclusion that removal of the fill and revegetation never occurred. Were it not for this unpermitted development, the area would have remained wetlands area. Unpermitted development cannot be used as a basis to justify development in areas where, were it not for the unpermitted development, such development would not be allowed. Thus, consideration of appropriate land use designation must consider site conditions as if the unpermitted development had not occurred. Therefore, this area is considered a wetland. As proposed, the amendment would allow land uses like residential and related uses, like roads,within wetland areas. Thus, the proposed land use designation is not consistent with Section 30233 of the Coastal Act. Potential Unpermitted Development Unpermitted development cannot be used as a basis to justify development in areas where, were it not for the unpermitted development, such development would not be consistent with the requirements of the Coastal Act. The site, as has been mentioned, has historically been farmed. Discerning changes in topography on the order of a few feet to fractions of a foot over the course of 30 years and ascertaining that such changes are not due to normal farming activities at a site where farming activities are on-going is problematic. Nevertheless it is important to assure that if wetland areas have been eliminated due to unpermitted activity, that those areas are considered as if the unpermitted activity had not occurred. Thus, if areas that would have met the Commission's definition of a wetland have been altered such that they no longer meet that definition only due to unpermitted activity, that area must be afforded the same protection as would be required had the unpermitted activity not illegally altered the wetlands. It has been suggested that the land alterations in the area of the EPA delineated wetland were the result of"normal farming activity" and so could not be considered unpermitted development in terms of the need for a coastal development permit. However, any activities,whether normal farming activities or other,that would result in the fill of wetlands cannot be exempt from the need to obtain approval of a coastal development permit. Regarding "leveling of land as a normal farming activity", a joint EPA and Department of the Army memorandum3 states: "grading activities that would change any area of water of the United States, including wetlands, into dry.land is not exempt." Furthermore, Section 323.4(a)(1)(iii)(D)of the Army Corps of Engineers regulations pertaining to discharge of dredged or fill material into the waters of the United States, states that the term plowing 3 Memorandum:Clean Water Act Section 404 Regulatory Program and Agricultural Activities;United States EPA and United States Department of the Army,May 3,1990 Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 31 "does not include the redistribution of soil, rock, sand or other surficial material in a manner which changes any area of the water of the United States to dry land." The Commission agrees and finds that if a wetland is filled and no coastal development permit has been obtained,the fill activity constitutes unpermitted development. The Commission makes no determination at this time whether the fill activity constitutes unaermitted development. Regardless of the precise nature of the time farming activity, because the LCPA proposes allowing non-farming uses such as the proposed residential and park uses outside of the modified wetland and buffer area, and requires restoration of a 4.0-acre modified EPA wetland, along with establishment of a 900-foot buffer adjacent, the Commission finds that the modified EPA wetlands is protected as a wetland under the Coastal Act. In a letter dated July 9, 2007 submitted to the Commission at its July 2007 hearing from the California Farm Bureau Federation (see exhibit XXX), raises three issues regarding the LCPA staff report: 1) staffs recommendation relies on an EPA study, but there may no longer be any federal jurisdiction authority based on more recent EPA guidance documents; 2) the subject site's status of"prior converted cropland"; and 3) what constitutes "normal farming activities." Regarding more recent EPA guidance documents the letter states: "In light of new USEPA and USACOE memorandums and the Staff Report's reliance on these agencies' findings, there may no longer be any federal jurisdictional authority over the disputed wetlands. In turn, this may alter key conclusions in the staff report." The documents referenced describe procedures to be followed in determining when the EPA/USACE have jurisdiction in implementing the Clean Water Act. The guidance documents assist only in determining when a Section 404 permit is necessary from the EPA and have no bearing on a past wetland delineation and cannot be interpreted as negating a past delineation. Furthermore, one of the referenced documents (Memorandum: Clean Water Act Section 404 Regulatory Programs and Agricultural Activities) states: "For example, if a farmer has been plowing, planting and harvesting in wetlands, he can continue to do so without the need for a Section 404 permit, so long as he does not convert the wetlands to dry land (emphasis added]." Thus, even by the standards cited by the Farm Bureau, farming that converts a wetland to dry land is not exempt from the requirement to obtain Section 404 review. Furthermore, the 1989 EPA wetland delineation assessed the presence of wetlands and found that wetlands did exist at the site. Commission staff have reviewed that study as well as a great deal of other information (as cited in the Commission staff memoranda) and, as is outlined in the staff memoranda, found the EPA wetland delineation valid (with adjustments as described elsewhere). A change in other agencies'guidance documents has no bearing on the results of the earlier wetland delineation. The letter also raises the question of whether the subject site should be considered "prior converted cropland". The Farm Bureau letter states: "Farm Bureau also believes that the Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 32 Coastal Commission should apply and document the site specific facts of this issue against USACOE RGL 90-7 and USEPA's applicable regulations and guidance documents regarding prior converted cropland." The letter further states: "However, attention should be given to the disputed area's present and recent past characteristics and use as prior converted crop land." The letter refers to a November 20, 1998 letter from the Natural Resource Conservation Service designating the subject site as prior converted cropland. That November 20, 1998 Natural Resource Conservation Service letter states that it based its determination that the site is "prior converted cropland"on two factors: 1) the site has been farmed prior to 1985, and, 2)designation of the property as "Prior Converted Cropland" by the Army Corps of Engineers in 1992, review of their designation in 1998 and an independent report from Lisa Kegarice of Tom Dodson and Associates in December of 1997 have determined that this property meets the criteria for Prior Converted Cropland." However, the Commission's staff ecologist's memo dated July 27, 2006 (exhibit K) includes review of the Natural Resource Conservation Service's 1998 letter (among many other documents) and addresses the issue of"prior converted cropland" at length. As described in greater detail in the Commission ecologist's 7/27/06 memo,the decision to dismiss the site from regulation under the Clean Water Act, was based on the faulty work contained in the Kegarice report of 1997 and the fact that errors in that report have been perpetuated without challenge until now. Furthermore, designation of a site as prior converted cropland simply allows on-going farming to continue. The proposed LUP amendment would not continue farming at the site, so that designation, even if it had been accurately applied, is moot when considering allowing non-farming uses such as the proposed residential and active park uses. Finally, the Farm.Bureau letter questions Commission staffs assessment that activities that have occurred on site are not normal farming activities. On-going farming activities, such as plowing and discing, that are consistent with the continuance of existing wetlands constitute normal farming activities. However, methods, such as grading, that go beyond normal farming activities have occurred on site, resulting in the loss and/or fill of wetlands, and do not constitute normal farming activities. Moreover, members of the public have also presented evidence to suggest that activities that are employed at the site do not constitute normal farming activities. And, they have argued, those activities have, over time, substantially reduced the presence and extent of areas that would otherwise have met the Coastal Act definition of wetland: Such activities include, but may not necessarily be limited to, use of a bulldozer and a box plough to move earth in the area of the agricultural field. The Commission concurs that use of such earth moving equipment, particularly when it results in the fill of wetlands, is not typically associated with normal farming activities. Development, including earth movement on a scale that requires a bulldozer or box plough, in an area of known wetland presence(i.e. 1989 EPA wetland delineation; Commission's 1982 and 1984 actions deferring certification of the site; DFG Study of Wetlands at Bolsa Chica), without an approved coastal development permit peas�tit tas may constitute unpermitted development. Also, other non-farming activities have historically occurred on the site. In 1982 the Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 33 Commission approved the above mentioned coastal development permit No. 5-82-278. The approved development was located near the southwest corner of the site, straddling the former City/County boundary(see exhibit BBB). Fill (1,500 to 3,000 cubic yards)for an expanded parking area was explicitly approved as part of that coastal development permit. Evidence shows that only the area of the expanded parking lot that was explicitly described in the approved permit was approved for placement of fill under that coastal development permit approval. If so, any additional fill in the area of the remaining equestrian facility may constitute unpermitted fill. The development described in the application for the coastal development permit requests the following: placement of mobile home as a caretaker facility; additional stable facilities [emphasis added]; grading and fill of a parking facility for approximately 50 cars; removal of fill and revegetation [described previously]; and placement of a fence around the revegetated area. The City's 1981 Conditional Use Permit for the project (CUP No. 81-13) refers to a request to expand [emphasis added] an existing horse facility. The City's CUP staff report states: "The existing [emphasis added]temporary horse stable on the site has been in operation since 1966."and "According to the applicant most of the existing [emphasis added]facilities were installed prior to 1977. These characterizations of portions of development existing prior to the Commission's jurisdiction in the area (which began on 111/77)were carried over into the Coastal Commission staff report for 5-82-278. However, review of aerial photos indicates that the equestrian facility was.not present until 1978, after the Commission's jurisdiction in the area began. Both the City and County of Orange planning staff have reviewed their records for permits for the stable facility that predate 1978, but have found no permits earlier than 19814. Regardless of whether or not any portion of the equestrian facility pre-dates the Coastal Act, review of historic aerial photos and topographic maps indicate subsequent actions at the subject site have resulted in fill beyond the footprint and/or at higher elevations than what was approved under coastal development permit 5-82-278.Any fill placed on the site, other than that specifically approved for the 50 space parking area approved under cdp 5- 82-278, is maw unpermitted. It should be noted that a coastal development permit application was submitted in 1993, 5- 93-376 (Hole in the Wall Stable). The 1993 application requested approval of continued use of.the existing equestrian facility(formerly Smokey's Stables). At that time Commission staff determined the request was exempt from the need for a coastal development permit because it simply requested continued use of an existing facility, no construction or grading/fill was proposed (see exhibit DDD). It appears the request was mischaracterized in that the equestrian facilities present in 1993 were larger still than even those requested in 1982. In addition, at the direction of Commission staff, the current.property owner submitted a 4 The County approved CUP No.80-92 to permit the establishment of a commercial stable on the County portion of the site on 2/26/81_ Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 34 coastal development permit application for discing the site in 1999 (5-99-303, Shea Homes). In response to that application, staff informed the applicant at that time that no permit was needed "based on the property's prior usage for agricultural purposes." (see exhibit NNN). However, staffs determination that no permit was necessary was based on a 1998 letter from CDFG (Exhibit YYY), stating that, based on a consultant's report, no wetlands were present and the likelihood of wetland restoration on site was slim. But that CDFG assessment relied, not on an actual wetland delineation by CDFG, but rather on the flawed analysis contained in a wetlands assessment of the site conducted by Tom Dodson and Associates (Kegarice, 1997) . Thus, staffs determination that no permit was needed was in error, based on faulty information prepared by others. Furthermore, staffs determination that no permit was necessary was also based on the characterization by the applicant(Shea Homes)that the development requested was discing of the site. The letter from staff indicating no permit was necessary responded only to the request to continue shallow discing of the farmed area. However, the site has been subjected to farming practices that may go beyond what can be considered "normal farming activities" and which were not described as part of the project description in the permit application. Supporting this conclusion are recently documented incidents at the site that include use of a bulldozer and a box plough. In addition, in his memorandum dated 7/2/07 (exhibit MMM), regarding the history of the EPA wetland area, the Commission's Mapping/GIS Program Manager concludes dramatic changes have occurred in this decade. The 7/2/07 memorandum states "Although agriculture has gone on in this area since the 1930's, the elevations have consistently indicated a topographic depression here. Aerial photography shows repeated instances of ponding in the area. In this decade the topography has changed dramatically, with the obliteration of the depression in its original location and the creation of a smaller, narrower depression at the western margin of the agricultural field." However, other than permit 5-82-278 and the two circumstances mentioned above, no other permit history for the site has been discovered. The question of whether development occurred without benefit of an approved coastal development permit is particularly important due to the history of wetlands on site. There is evidence to suggest that areas where topography has been modified may have supported wetlands. If wetlands were present at the time of past development, the Coastal Act requires that those wetlands be protected. Review of historic aerial photos of the site, comparison of various historic and recent topographic maps of the site, photos of earth moving equipment not normally associated with farming activities, and earth moving in the area of previously delineated wetlands (i.e. EPA) also raise significant questions as to whether the site has been altered in ways that would have required a coastal development permit. Construction of the Cabo del Mar condominiums —outside the coastal zone, but adjacent to the subject site—appears to have included development that extended onto the subject 5 See exhibit K, Memo from the Commission's staff ecologist explaining why that analysis is flawed and does not reflect actual site conditions. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 35 site and thus, within the coastal zone. Prior to the development of the Cabo del Mar condominiums (c. 1983— 1985), a portion of the runoff from the approximately 22-acre site drained onto the Parkside property and contributed to the hydrology of the wetland mapped by EPA. At some point after the Cabo del Mar construction, the drainage was directed to new drain pipes that were installed across the subject site. Section 30231 of the Coastal Act requires that all wetlands be maintained by preventing substantial interference with surface water flow. Construction of the drainage pipes impacted one source of water that fed the EPA wetland, inconsistent with Section 30231 of the Coastal Act. Such development would have required a coastal development permit from the Coastal Commission. However, no such permit was obtained. Regarding the EPA wetland area, evidence suggests that this wetland relied on surface water rather than groundwater. Any loss of runoff would have a negative effect on the wetland that was historically present in the EPA area and on the wetlands that are currently present. Open Space Conservation Area In summary, in order to be most protective of wetlands, the additional wetland area, beyond what is proposed to be designated Open Space-Conservation, must be recognized and appropriately designated under this LUP amendment. At a minimum, that would include the APOW and expanded CP areas, and portions of the wetland area identified by the EPA in a document published in 1989. Although it is very likely the area between the former equestrian facility and the WP would be considered wetland area now were it not for unpermitted development, that determination cannot be conclusively made. and rgnto sue. .,... afro thfai mflci h,. doe :.. The area delineated by the EPA as wetland totaled approximately 8.3 acres. However, as described in the October 25, 2007 memorandum prepared by the Commission's staff ecologist,the 8.3 acre figure appears to have been based on observations during a period when construction activities on an adjacent property resulted in a temporary direction of excess off-site drainage onto the subject site. Several lines-of evidence suggest that a reasonable estimate for the size of the wetland before and after the construction is about 4.0 acres. Loner-time farming activities resulted in the loss of the 4-acre EPA wetland area. Section 30233 of the Coastal Act requires.that loss of wetlands due to fill must be mitigated. The Commission typically requires mitigation at a ratio of 4:1 (area of mitigation to wetland area lost). The Commission ffnds thatthe kWS of 4.0-acre modified EPA wetland 6ififfiqtv must be "� restored. However, the activities that resulted in the loss of the EPA wetland area also contributed to the creation of wetlands in the area of the WR�AP. Thus, it would be appropriate to aUomv ' area of th^ 146R 95 Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 36 oresenre the area of the AP (0.61 acres) and mitigate the loss of the 4-acre EPA wetland area through restoration of the 4.0-acre modified EPA wetland, as delineated by the Staff Ecologist. to-st w 4- Ia wore s of wetland w a to ho ffow{oeJ. 0_n5 aeFess IlA/Qi ( �AQ7- 1 fit; �a n R I q ��•.oro - 11;.?n 4w_4A ____ _jr _14ratland ap9j; Therefore, in addition to the AP, an additional 44A4 4_0 acres of wedand=eroaMw restoration on site surrounded by a 100- foot buffer would be required to ' " ale address the loss of the 4-acre EPA wetland. Thus, area that must be preserved on site includes the AP, # I expanded CP areas, modified 4.0 acre EPA wetland {^a^»�' a,:{ ^{^�", ESHA areas, wetland and ESHA buffer area and r te- Preservation and/or restoration of the AP, expanded CP and restored ®I'4.0-acre EPA wetlands may require supplemental water. She Qn-Imm:e-e-:on And- tho a Qsi w{:..» -hp.*1 Rpp!.e we-ras . tho wa Mara e d tan w :»{ .. e-t IVP wre s ito to the+ orthor» propyrfor r:» w{ w »{„ ,.{of t/fo ».,.... h.F r ar 4hw GQ. ���env wte,a..fall_»eJ_ and nwe-4 of Oho a r the »e�rFhor» G..ow {,... a=v'sv3� �a rn The area to be designated Open Space Conservation is depicted on —4U,revised Exhibit NN. ..IeI»..{-rowe-onwhl.e ho eJe..ee.loae+.d r r e-:.Jo n4'wJ or hoe.e, :..te.r.»:»ev►oeJ wrowe. ..•e�ro [e»o.a.» {.. ho . o4rwaeJ.- :W.» Min •In4h and ow►.e hwlFof o that area ..►eJ hw.ew .Jwl:nw.:tw.J w .wNwned w wontr.e if mnr4. .Jw tw . e.reti wraitahl- -nd4nr nwc IwneJ w►4wrw{:o» hivdnl oow•.r d =Imfharmnra tw Lwn {oevothor ivith he, area that a. st be eJoe-:e,.nwte.d nc to aro{oo =SW .eo4►wnd waed{hair .. re- ol!w .f r r atop f rwev:»g .»:4:el2t:e n thorn : ro w►l.e n 9ige,r wh►e. w ..,:thin tha w w to h.. ,d e- .,{,,,J inc n rharyf ra that ant:r•, w e ro ev•.:r rn:tievw{:�» �r.e•e.t/w aeJ : ate. »e�rwfl.e w{w rat:.. F A.4 /F eJ wo{:..a.. e.t.only.eeo.eleJ thw .e.earwaeJ-w w.e.'.+coed 4- 4oe-4- J w Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 37 3 On lab.,...,,,r it i mpgi:.,.. that l..«.J . ,. .J... :..„ o T that and :f : imnortant to a fire+ iflat...d...."af.. . l... i..-a_das .,f...d cn th,"siFull ....tA4t!as4... .. /: a r.,..Fio and M f" ..f:.,r.l .. The. m ,.f ".,f. I....J. .. .d....' .f:..r. d:. r-Ma .. g fh..f.+.+.� ,.h .. f ....:d.. f r fall r..m,• m d F..f..— ..,fh...d The Commission finds that only if modified consistent with the land use designations depicted on r 4!revised exhibit NN, can the proposed LUP amendment be found to be consistent with Sections 30233 and 30231 of the Coastal Act which require protection of wetlands. Moreover, the entire area was originally deferred certification due to the historic presence of wetland on site. In deferring certification originally, the Commission found: North Properties of the Bolsa Chica (Between Wintersburg Channel& base of Bluffs) (MWD Site #1 [virtually identical to the subject site of current LCP amendments]) The LUP designates this site for low density residential uses. No modifications were made in the LUP from the previous denial by the Commission. The Commission found in its "Preliminary.Wetlands Determination for the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Plan, March 11, 1980, that all available information demonstrated that the vast majority of the Bolsa Chica low lands exhibit all the characteristics set forth for the identification of wetlands pursuant to Section 30121 of the Coastal Act and concluded that the information supported a preliminary determination that areas identified on Exhibit J of the "Preliminary Determination" are wetland for the purposes of the Coastal Act. The Commission had also previously found in its denial of the City's LUP that this area contained wetland resources. Since that action and the previous review of the City's LUP, the.Commission and staff have examined additional information concerning the Bolsa Chica wetlands system. As part of the review of the Bolsa Chica LUP the Dept. of Fish and Game in the document"Determination of the Status of Bolsa Chica wetlands (as amended April 16, 1982) identified this area as "severely degraded Historic wetland—Not Presently Functioning as Wetland"and considered it within the context of the entire 6 As indicated in footnote 1,the boundaries of the M"site at the time of the 1982 staff report were not entirely.clear. However,the site clearly covered what is now the 40-acre ADC and may have covered the former County parcel and some of the 5-acre certified area as well. Moreover,it did not extend south of the flood control channel,so the observations recounted here are definitely applicable to the site that is the subject of the current application. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 38 Bolsa Chica wetland system. The DFG determined that this area is part of a 1,000 acre degraded wetland system in the area outside State ownership which is capable of being restored. The DFG report noted: "The 440 acres of historic wetland which no longer function viably as wetland consists of approximately 250 acres of roads, and pads, 70 acres of agricultural land[including the subject site], and about 120 acres of viably functioning upland habitat. The roads and fill areas presently function as resting substrate for wetland-associated wildlife, and form narrow ecotones which add to and enhance the diversity of habitat available to wildlife. The 120 acres of upland habitat, considered in union, may be considered environmentally sensitive because of their special role in the Bolsa Chica wetland ecosystem. Were it not for the involvement of dikes, roads and relatively shallow fills, these 440 acres would be viably functioning wetlands. The entire 1,324 acre study area, including 1,292 acres of historic wetland(in which 852 acres still function viably as wetlands[sic]constitutes a fundamentally inseparable wetland system of exceptional value to wildlife." The DFG also discussed potential restoration of these areas and noted that the amount of acreage and location of wetlands to be restored will be dependant on the amount of fill and existing wetlands which could be consolidated to allow some development in the lowlands. Thus, when the Commission originally deferred certification of the subject site, it did so based on the presence of wetlands. The Commission found that the site contained wetlands, even though the wetland functions were impaired, as is the case today. Moreover, farming was on-going at the time certification was deferred. Thus, the area was deferred certification even though the wetlands were impaired and farming was on-going. No change to those conditions have occurred in the intervening years. Thus, one cannot argue today that the site does not contain wetlands due to on-going farming activities or due to the impaired condition of the wetlands. Furthermore, unpermitted activities cannot be used as a basis to say that wetlands no longer exist at the site. In addition, in deferring certification of the site the Commission recognized that the site was an integral part of the overall Bolsa Chica wetland system and could feasibly be restored. If the site were to be restored it would be a valuable addition to the Bolsa Chica wetlands restoration project. Sources to feed a restored wetland at the site would come from rainfall and possibly from the adjacent EGGWFCC, as well as urban runoff. And perhaps also from re-establishing the site as the location to accept runoff from the Cabo del Mar condominiums. In any case, restoration of the site as a freshwater wetland would be consistent with the historic wetland system which would typically have included a freshwater component, albeit significantly inland of the subject site. The addition of freshwater habitat to the Bolsa Chica wetlands restoration would greatly increase the biodiversity of the overall restoration project. In addition, taken with the preservation of the Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 39 eucalyptus grove, described below, the area would provide significant habitat benefits. In addition to protecting the wetland area itself, it is important to establish buffer areas between the wetland and development. Buffers, by separating development from wetlands, minimize the adverse effects of development on wetlands, thereby avoiding significant adverse effects to resources. Buffers also provide transitional habitat and upland area necessary for survival of various animal species. The Commission has typically found that a minimum 100-foot buffer, or larger, is necessary to protect wetlands. Without the establishment of a minimum buffer size, projects could be approved with an inadequate buffer,jeopardizing the continuing viability of the wetland. Section 30250 of the Coastal Act requires that new development be located where it will not have significant adverse effects, either individually or cumulatively, on coastal resources. Wetlands constitute a coastal resource. In addition, Section 30231 of the Coastal Act requires that all wetlands be maintained by providing natural vegetation buffer areas. The City's certified LUP includes Policy C 7.1.4, which requires buffers around wetlands. This policy would apply to the subject site, but it allows a lesser buffer area if existing development or site configuration preclude a full 100 feet. In this case, such circumstances do not apply because the site is 50 acres in size and is not constrained by the site configuration or by existing development. A buffer less than 100 feet from all on-site wetlands is not adequately protective of the wetland. The proposed amendment does not recognize all wetland areas present on site and does not provide any buffer requirements specific to the site. Thus, as proposed, the amendment could result in locating development too close to the wetland, threatening the survival of the resource, inconsistent with Section 30250 which requires that the location of development avoid significant adverse effects on coastal resources such as wetlands and Section 30231 which requires natural vegetation buffer areas. The extent of wetlands on site over the last 30 years, and past activities on the site that may have impacted those wetlands are difficult to determine with certainty. The Commission is charged with protecting wetlands, and limiting uses allowed within wetlands, as well as assuring that any allowable use is the least environmentally damaging alternative and that adequate mitigation is provided. The Commission must also assure that the quality of wetlands is maintained by, among other things, preventing substantial interference with surface water flow. In order to achieve these requirements, the Commission must review the evidence available to it, even when that evidence may conflict or be incomplete, and arrive at a conclusion that is most protective of wetlands. In this case,the Commission, after reviewing available evidence, finds that on balance there is stronger evidence to support the conclusion that there are significantly more wetlands at the site than has been recognized in the LUPA request. At a minimum, the additional wetland area includes the AP, expanded CP, the area delineated by the EPA in 1989 (as adjusted Any wetland delineation prepared for the subject site must recognize that the site is both a `difficult site to delineate' (i.e_ an area where conditions make the use of standard field indicators of wetland parameters difficult [e.g. soils formed under hydric conditions Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 40 associated with tidal inundation that is no longer present]) and `atypical' because human activities (i.e. farming) have resulted in the lack of positive indicators of one or more wetland parameters. The wetland delineation must account for circumstances where indicators are absent or difficult to interpret but other evidence demonstrates that the component(s) recognized by the Commission that comprise a wetland are present or would be present if not for the 'difficult' or`atypical' situation. For example, the wetland delineation must recognize and account for circumstances where vegetation indicators cannot be expected; hydric soil indicators may be artifacts of prior conditions; the soil surface is frequently disturbed, which removes indicators of recent inundation; plowing may drastically alter the soil profile; irrigation might confound the interpretation of the presence of recruiting wetland plants and the presence of indicators of recent hydric conditions. Because the site historically has been, more or less continuously farmed, these indicators may be lacking even though the area may be "wet enough, long enough" that wetland features would develop. It is critical that future wetland delineations of the site recognize this protocol and that, consequently, even if the usual wetland indicators are not observable,wetland areas must still be identified if those areas meet Coastal Commission criteria. Wetland delineations must be sufficiently current to represent present site conditions. As proposed, the LUP amendment does not include this clarifying information. Therefore a modification is suggested to specifically incorporate this standard into the site specific section of the LUP. It should be noted that construction of a flood protection levee within the wetland buffer area, provided it is the least environmentally damaging alternative, would not be incompatible with the continuance of the wetland. In order to be the least environmentally damaging alternative, the flood protection levee should be placed outside the buffer wherever possible, and as close to land designated for residential and/or active park uses as much as possible. According to the related coastal development permit application for the subject site and the project proponent, the type of flood protection levee to be constructed would be a vegetated flood protection feature (VFPF), essentially vegetated earthen berm with an internal sheet pile wall. The VFPF would not be expected to adversely impact the wetland because 1)there would only be temporary construction- related impacts,2)once constructed,the VFPF would be planted to provide upland habitat that complements the wetland vegetation, and, 3)the VFPF would not require maintenance once constructed, thus intrusions into the buffer would be limited only to those necessary during construction. For these reasons locating a flood protection levee such as the one described above within the wetland buffer would be consistent with Sections 30233 and 30250 of the Coastal Act regarding wetland protection. �..4i.... .J1.J ..�6 :� .+rf•.ii.♦/.+.+.J.� .ter-t.. m A aethf7 - -- Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 41 anIr_ Furthermore, Section 30250 of the Coastal Act requires that new development be located where it will not have adverse effects on coastal resources. Wetlands constitute a coastal resource. Section 30231 of the Coastal Act requires that all wetlands be maintained and where feasible restored, by preventing depletion of ground water supplies and substantial interference with surface water flow and by maintaining natural vegetation buffer areas. Based on information submitted with the related coastal development permit application, a significant amount of earthwork would be necessary to prepare the site for residential development. It is essential that any earthwork undertaken on the site not interfere with the continuance of all on-site wetlands. No grading is allowed within the wetland and its buffer area under the Coastal Act (unless the grading is for the express purpose of wetland restoration). Grading, outside of the wetland, ESHA and necessary buffers, could only be considered if no adverse impacts to the wetlands resulted. If grading redirected groundwater and/or surface water flow such that water from the site no longer fed the wetlands, it would create an adverse effect on the wetland, which is a coastal resource, inconsistent with Sections 30231 and 30250 of the Coastal Act. The proposed amendment does not include any requirements that other site development, including earthwork, assure that no adverse effect occur to the wetlands. Thus, even if no grading were to occur within the wetlands and buffer areas, adverse impacts to on-site wetlands might result from the LUP amendment as proposed. However, if the amendment is modified to include language that requires the protection of the wetlands from all development on-site, the amendment could be found to be consistent with Section 30250 of the Coastal Act which requires no adverse effects to coastal resources occur. In addition to the modifications suggested above, additional measures must be incorporated into the LUP amendment for the subject site to assure that future development adjacent to the wetland and buffer areas and throughout the site does not adversely impact the wetland. For example, if no restrictions were placed on landscaping throughout the site, invasive plants within the residential areas could invade the wetland areas, potentially displacing the wetland plants. In addition, pets from the residential development, if unrestricted, may enter the wetland area causing disruption. As proposed the LUP amendment does not include any site specific restrictions regarding potential impacts to continuation of the wetland, inconsistent with Section 30250 of the Coastal Act. However if modified to include a prohibition on invasive plants throughout the site, and a requirement for a domestic animal management plan, and fencing along the buffer/development interface, as part of the site specific LUP language,the amendment could be found consistent with Section 30250 of the Coastal Act. Specific suggested modifications to accomplish this are necessary to bring the proposed amendment into conformance with the Coastal Act. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 42 Members of the public have raised concerns that unpermitted development has taken place on the property that is the subject of this amendment, and that such unpermitted development has affected the extent of wetlands on the site. Unpermitted development cannot be used as a basis to justify development in areas where,were it not for the unpermitted development, such development would not be allowed. This is true whether there is a specific policy reflecting this in the LUP or not. In this case, however, �m &fit the Commission has established ro~the extent of wetlands on the property and a development footprint ...t,.ar..,han .. n mit f try: alto i Mfgnt. #bG r„„„Y.:,. ,.....tom ,,,r;s:,..,s:,. ..ftt,,. .,--- ornnfigsviga3ks � . — u ss MUSt 1.9 .. ..:�,I. rad tho .J�..�../...�w.�...i L... 6 . The Commission finds that only if modified as seed indicated on staff exhibit NN OT Revised)can the proposed land use plan amendment be found to be consistent with and adequate to carry out Sections 30233 and 30250 of the Coastal Act regarding wetlands. 3. Eucalyptus ESHA The subject site contains environmentally sensitive habitat areas (ESHA). The trees within the"eucalyptus grove," within and adjacent to the subject site's western boundary are ESHA due to the important ecosystem functions they provide to a suite of raptor species. Section 30240 requires that ESHA be protected from significant disruption and that only uses dependent upon the resource are allowed within ESHA. In addition, Section 30240 requires development adjacent to ESHA be sited and designed to prevent impacts which would significantly degrade those areas. Section 30240 further requires that development be compatible with the continuance of the habitat area. This policy is carried over into the City's certified LUP ESHA policies. In order to assure the ESHA is not significantly degraded and is protected and remains viable, in addition to precluding non-resource dependent development within the ESHA, a buffer zone around the ESHA must be established. A buffer zone would require that development adjacent to the ESHA be set back an appropriate distance from the ESHA. The setback is intended to move the development far enough away from the ESHA so as #o reduce any impacts that may otherwise accrue from the development upon the ESHA and that would significantly degrade the ESHA or be.incompatible with its continuance. The distance between the ESHA and development,the buffer zone, must be wide enough to assure that the development would not degrade the ESHA and also would be compatible with the continuance of the ESHA. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 43 The property owner has suggested a "variable width buffer" as a means of protecting the ESHA (see Attachment C. exhibits I and 2). A variable width buffer would be appropriate. The variable width buffer proposed by the property owner would establish a minimum distance of 297 feet between the ESHA and residential or active dark development(note: 100 meters is 328 feet) The variable width buffer Proposed by the property owner would establish a maximum buffer distance of at least 650 feet between the ESHA and residential or active park development.. In some areas of the site, the effective width of the buffer area would substantially exceed 100 meters due to the relative location of the EPA wetland area and buffer and the AP wetland and buffer. The area occupied by EPA and AP wetlands and their buffers would provide appropriate ESHA buffer in that development with the related noise and activities would not occur within them and also those areas would remain viable as raptor foraging area. The property owner's proposed variable width ESHA buffer includes a water duality Natural Treatment System (NTS) as an allowable use within the ESHA buffer near the southern grove (see Attachment C. exhibits 9 and 2). The NTS as proposed by the property owner is setback a minimum of 246 feet from the ESHA. Portions of a Natural Treatment System (NTS), would be appropriate within the ESHA buffer as long as it is located as shown on Attachment C. exhibits 1 and 2. An NTS within the ESHA buffer subiect to the setback described above, would be acceptable because it would occupy only a very small portion of the overall buffer area. Furthermore. the NTS itself will provide some habitat value The shallow water habitat will increase the variety of habitats within the buffer area. For these reasons. allowing an NTS type system within the outer ESHA buffer as shown on Attachment C. exhibits 1 and 2 would not be expected to degrade the ESHA and would be compatible with its continuance. As proposed by the property owne& the variable width ESHA buffer would pre en development that is not compatible with the continuance of the ESHA from occurring in a location where it would disrupt the ESHA and disrupt it Therefore. the Commission finds the variable width buffer proposed by the property owner will adequately protect the entire ESHA. The buffer should not be measured from mvoaorum. It is important to note, however, that the "eucalyptus"ESHA is an area that includes several species of non-native trees that provide important habitat for a large suite of raptors. These trees are predominantly eucalWfus, but also include pines and palms, Using aerial photographs, staff has drawn the boundaries of the ESHA by connecting the _apparent drip lines of the outmost trees: It has been sugvested that this has resulted in including a clump of myoporum an invasive exotic that probably is not important to raptors. Although, it is appropriate to ignore the mvoporum when drawing the boundam if other nearby trees are species that provide habitat for raptors, the latter should be included within the ESHA boundary even if that results in some myoporum being present within the ESHA. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 44 .Id- w--- 294 f wf(sag3C:e Q of Q) .+:w..,ri 0 wwwl '..{'.. 7Nr'//17 Al C.�L.:L.:f/1/1/ll LJ w...w ar;--- fL.:.. .."Atilt a .ter.. fw ....w hwwr. wLitai ad bw wtar w2gina -the .dw..wlor. ..F wwfh-.wL frw... l.wfL. the .. ..fL.wr feet(50 r.FF r .. /w.... {{....,, 100 mote.-.- : ...Jw.......fw to o wfww{f{.w &&NA .+ rw.J hur As proposed, ESHA area would be land use designated Open Space Parks, which would allow active park uses within the ESHA. In order to assure the ESHA is protected, in addition to precluding development within the ESHA, a buffer zone around the ESHA must be established. As proposed, the LUP amendment designates necessary buffer area Open Space Parks and Low Density Residential. The proposed designations would allow residential and park uses within the required buffer areas. Residential and park uses within ESHA and its buffer are inconsistent with Section 30240 of the Coastal Act. The land use designation that protects ESHA by limiting uses within ESHA to those allowed under Section 30240, and that prevents disruption of the habitat is Open Space Conservation. In order to assure that development adjacent to the ESHA does not significantly degrade or impair the continuance of the ESHA, the appropriate land use designation for both the ESHA and its buffer area is Open Space Conservation. Uses allowed within the ESHA buffer for the southern grove are limited to resource dependent uses, habitat restoration. and VFPF(described below). In addition. within the northern grove ESHA buffer passive nark use may be allowed if it is located more than 150 feet from the ESHA but the uses within the passive park are limited to nature trails benches for passive use, and habitat enhancement. restoration, creation and management. Such uses are acceptable within the ESHA buffer because they are compatible with the continuance of the ESHA. It is also worth noting that California gnatcatchers (Polioptila californica californica), a species listed as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act, are known to frequent the subject site, especially the western portion. Also, Southern tarplant (Centromedia parryi ssp_ Australis), a California Native Plant Society"l b.17 species (seriously endangered in California), also exists at the site. However,the Southern tarplant exists in .scattered areas on the site. A focused survey documented the presence of 42 individuals, distributed in 6 locations. The Commission's staff ecologist, in a memo dated 12/19/06 (see exhibit N), concludes that neither the seasonal gnatcatcher foraging habitat nor the Southern tarplant on the subject site meet the Coastal Act definition of ESHA. Nevertheless, regarding gnatcatcher habitat on-site, the staff ecologist's memo states, "it is worth noting that the areas of marginal habitat where gnatcatchers have been observed Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 45 are not proposed for development." Regarding the Southern tarplant, the memo states: "In contrast to the habitats on the Bolsa Chica mesa, the scattered areas containing southern tarplant on the Parkside property do not appear to be significant habitat for this species,and it is my opinion that these areas do not meet the definition of ESHA under the Coastal Act. In any case, if the amendment is modified as suggested, the gnatcatcher's habitat and the southern tarplant on site will be retained within the Open Space- Conservation designation. The land use designations within the ESHA must be limited to the designation that allows only those uses dependent upon the ESHA. In addition,the land use designation within the buffer zone must be the designation that allows only those uses compatible with the continuance of the ESHA, and that will not degrade the ESHA. Furthermore, it is important to assure the continuance of the raptor community by reserving adequate foraging area. In fact, the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) provided statements to this effect in a letter to the City dated June 15, 1998 commenting on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Parkside project (see Exhibit=). In that letter, CDFG states that "...fajgricultural areas, grasslands and wetlands are of seasonal importance to several species of raptors in Orange County by providing important, if not vital, staging and wintering habitat. These habitats also provide foraging areas for resident breeding raptors." CDFG goes on the express concern about the loss of raptor foraging areas within the project site and vicinity and the impacts such loss may have on the adjacent Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve. However, CDFG didn't suggest any specific mitigation for this loss in this letter. The wet/and areas, their buffers as well as the ESHA buffers will provide some raptor foraging area. , 'n re q e Fi t i Fea rs, Fe :,,r in r,,, doe:,..,.,s,,,a inn-., sh- Ines -o¢`ras c-sinct habitat ^` gt0% As proposed, the LUP amendment would not preserve all ESHA areas or provide required buffers and thus is not consistent with Section 30240 of the Coastal Act. In addition, because the proposed land use designations within and adjacent to ESHA do not limit the uses to those consistent with Section 30240 of the Coastal Act, the proposed LUPA is inconsistent with this Coastal Act requirement to protect ESHA. Therefore the amendment must be denied as proposed. However, if the proposed amendment were modified to land use designate all ESHA and necessary feisu an-1 buffer area Open Space-Conservation as depicted on r 4!revised exhibit NN, the amendment would be consistent with Section 30240 of the Coastal Act. The above referenced exhibit depicts all areas on site that are recommended for designation as Open Space-Conservation (OS-C). The recommended OSC area encompasses all known wetland areas on site and necessary buffer Ond mifinationarea, all ESHA on site and the required buffer-. forauinci . By retaining adequate area on site as OS-C, a Residential designation on the remainder of the site could be found compatible with continuance of the ESHA. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 46 ,+vh;4:« r 4:11,.,,1. „41..„,J GCLJA 'ram,,,/L,..�F :4• -.4?.+.+ -,4„ ia„mdd L.,. •.4r :.� 4h:, 1.,.,..s..s :4.e.,...1„►«r,�.,:,1, L. .i.:4..4: -.►..,. «,.I..,J:«rx s It should be noted that construction of a flood protection levee within the ESHA buffer, provided it is the least environmentally damaging alternative,would not significantly degrade the ESHA. Alternatives that minimize encroachment into buffer area are preferred. According to the related coastal development permit application for the subject site and the project proponent, the type of flood protection levee to be constructed would be a vegetated flood protection feature (VFPF), essentially a vegetated earthen berm with an internal sheet pile wall. The VFPF would not be expected to degrade the ESHA because 1)there would only be temporary construction-related impacts, 2)once constructed, the VFPF would be planted, thus providing habitat, and, 3)the VFPF would not require maintenance once constructed, thus intrusions into the ESHA buffer due to the VFPF would be limited only to those necessary during construction. For these reasons locating a flood protection levee such as the vegetated flood protection levee described above within the ESHA buffer would be consistent with Section 30240 of the Coastal Act regarding protection of ESHA. The actual design and construction of the flood protection levee would depend on its location. In addition to land use designating all ESHA area and necessary buffer and mitigation areas Open Space-Conservation, additional measures must be incorporated into the LUP amendment for the subject site to assure that future development does not adversely impact the ESHA. For example, fuel modification requirements necessary to protect future development from fire hazard must be addressed to assure habitat values within the ESHA and required buffer areas are not adversely affected. In addition, if no restrictions were placed on landscaping throughout the site, invasive plants within the residential areas could invade the ESHA areas, potentially displacing the ESHA plants. In addition, pets from the residential development, if unrestricted, may enter the ESHA area causing disruption. As proposed, the LUP amendment does not include any site development restrictions intended to eliminate the site development's potential disruptions to the ESHA, inconsistent with Section 30240 of the Coastal Act. However if modified to include a prohibition on invasive plants throughout the site, and a requirement for a domestic animal management plan, and fencing as part of the site specific LUP language, the amendment can be found consistent with Section 30240 of the Coastal Act. Specific suggested modifications to accomplish this are necessary to find the proposed amendment consistent with the Coastal Act. Therefore,the Commission finds that only as modified can the proposed amendment be found to be consistent with Section 30240 of the Coastal Act. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 47 4. Density As proposed the amendment would allow a density of up to 7 dwelling units per acre on approximately 38 acres of the 50 acre site which would yield a maximum of 266 units on the area proposed to be designated residential. However, the related coastal development permit application contemplates just 170 detached single family homes on relatively large lots. The City has proposed a residential land use designation of RL (Residential Low, maximum of 7 units per net acre). However, the City's certified LUP includes a residential land use designation of RM (Residential Medium, from 7 to a maximum of 15 units per net acre). The Commission's suggested modifications necessary to protect coastal resources would reduce the allowable development footprint from the proposed approximately 38 acres to approximately 26.5 acres. If developed at the maximum allowed under RL, a total of 119 units would be the maximum number possible. This would still provide a viable use of the site. However density consistent with the RM designation would also be acceptable within the allowable development footprint. if the RM designation were applied to the site, the maximum total number of units.possible would be 255 units, significantly more than the number currently contemplated by the property owner's development plan. Although 255 units are not guaranteed under the RM designation, the ability to establish more units under RM leaves the property owner with greater flexibility in determining the best use of its property. It is worth noting that, although the project site abuts a low density, single family detached residential development to the north (along Kenilworth Drive and Greenleaf Avenue), there are also higher density multi family residential developments adjacent to and nearby the project site. The previously described Cabo del Mar condominium complex is adjacent to the subject site. Immediately to the north and west of Cabo del Mar are additional multi family residential developments. Thus developing at a higher density at the subject site would not be out of the scale or character of the surrounding development. In addition, Section 30250 of the Coastal Act encourages residential development to be concentrated in areas able to accommodate it. The higher residential density allowed under the RM designation would allow development at the site to be concentrated in the northeast portion of the site, consistent with this Coastal Act requirement. Thus, a modification is suggested which would allow the City, at the time it considers accepting the suggested modifications recommended herein, to apply either the RL or the RM designation. 5. Water Quality Section 30230 of the Coastal Act requires that marine resources be maintained, enhanced, and where feasible, restored. Section 30231 of the Coastal Act requires that the biological productivity and quality of coastal waters be protected. The City's certified LUP includes policies that reflect the requirements of 30230 and 30231 of the.Coastal Act. Development has the potential to adversely impact coastal water quality through the Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 48 removal of native vegetation, increase of impervious surfaces, increase of runoff, erosion, and sedimentation, introduction of pollutants such as petroleum, sediments, metals, cleaning products, pesticides, and other pollutant sources. The 50 acre project site is currently undeveloped, with the exception of farming activities. Under existing conditions, no runoff leaves the site during most rainfall events. However, installation of impervious surfaces and activities associated with residential development and related hardscape represent a potentially significant impact to water quality downstream of the project, which include the Inner and Outer Bolsa Bay, Muted Tidal Pocket wetlands, Huntington Harbour, and Anaheim Bay Wildlife Refuge. These downstream areas are likely to suffer increases in water quality impairment when site development produces greater volumes and velocities of runoff as well as introducing increased pollutant loads. It is important that LUP language for the subject site clearly address potential adverse impacts arising due to post development runoff into the channel and significant water bodies downstream. This is especially true because little or no runoff currently leaves the site during most rainfall events. However, the proposed amendment does not include such language. Without such language the LUP amendment is not consistent with the water quality policies of the Coastal Act. The subject site represents an excellent opportunity to incorporate a natural treatment system, such as a wetland detention system. There are multiple benefits from natural treatment systems such as pollutant removal, groundwater recharge, habitat creation, and aesthetics. Furthermore, maintenance needs are typically more apparent and less frequent with natural/vegetative treatment systems and thus are more likely to remain effective than mechanical systems such as storm drain inserts and the like which can become clogged and otherwise suffer mechanical difficulties. If mechanical treatment control BMPs are not continually maintained they will cease to be effective, and consequently water quality protection would not be maximized. Incorporating a natural treatment system, such as wetland detention pond system is feasible at the site. The site is an appropriate candidate for a natural treatment system because it is a large site unconstrained by existing development, limited lot size or limited by topography. There is plenty of space on the site to accommodate a wetland detention or similar type system while still allowing a reasonable development footprint. Moreover, because little or no drainage currently leaves the site, it is important that development of the site not result in creation of new adverse water quality impacts such as would result from increased runoff leaving the site. In order to achieve the goal of not creating new adverse water quality impacts, all dry weather flow would need to.be retained on site to the maximum extent practicable. The best way to accomplish retention of dry weather flow on site typically is some type of natural treatment system. Furthermore, in order to protect water quality year round it is appropriate to impose a standard that any runoff that leaves the site must meet. The generally accepted standard for stormwater runoff is a requirement to treat at least the 85t' percentile storm event, with at least a 24-hour Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 49 detention time. If dry weather runoff cannot be retained on site, it should be treated (e.g., detained for at least 48 hours and where practicable for seven days in a natural treatment system). The current LUP amendment does not require these site-specific water quality measures and standards. Therefore, there is no assurance that water quality will be protected. Consequently the amendment is not consistent with the water quality policies of the Coastal Act and must be denied. In addition, although the existing LUP includes policies that require projects to incorporate water quality BMPs, none of the existing LUP policies express a preference for types of treatment control BMPs. The preferred option for treatment control BMPs is, first, a natural treatment system (e.g. bio-swales, vegetative buffers, constructed or artificial wetlands), then, second, a combination of natural treatment and mechanical systems or BMPs, and last, use of mechanical treatment systems or BMPs alone (e.g. site-specific water quality treatment plants, storm drain filters and inserts). In addition, application of appropriate site design and source control BMPs reduces the amount of runoff that would need treatment control measures. Thus, site design and source control BMPs should be considered first in order to adequately size any necessary treatment control BMPs. In addition, the LUP does not contain any policy citing a hierarchy of preference for different types of BMPs. Without such an LUP policy, there is no guarantee they will be incorporated into projects when it is feasible to do so. Natural treatment systems,for the reasons described above, provide better water quality protection, among other benefits. Consequently the amendment is not consistent with the water quality policies of the Coastal Act and must be denied. However, if the amendment is modified as suggested to include this in LUP policy language, it would be consistent with the water quality policies of the Coastal Act. The use of permeable materials for paved areas in new developments is a site design and source control measure which can reduce the rate and volume of the first flush of stormwater runoff and can help to minimize or eliminate dry weather flow. The proposed amendment does not include any discussion on the benefits of incorporating permeable materials into the design of future projects. However, if the amendment is modified as suggested to include this in LUP policy language, it would be consistent with the water quality policies.of the Coastal Act. In addition, as proposed, the amendment does not include any requirements to minimize or eliminate dry weather flows through the use of site design and source control BMPs. Consequently, adverse water quality impacts due to dry weather flows are not minimized. However, if the amendment were modified as suggested to incorporate policy language addressing this measure, the amendment would be consistent with the water quality policies of the Coastal Act. The current City of Huntington Beach LCP Policy 6.1.6 (paragraph 4) states that, the City shall continue.implementation of the Municipal Non-Point[sic] Source National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards program which is required by an order Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 50 of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The policy also states that the City will continue to require a Water Quality Management Plan for all applicable new development and redevelopment in the.Coastal Zone. The Commission finds this policy should be modified to include the correct name and date of the permit and to incorporate this permit by reference into the Local Coastal Program. Updates to the NPDES permit (such as the update expected in 2007) should be submitted to the Executive Director for an LCP amendment. While the Commission recognizes that the City's existing policies address water quality protection and improvement within the City, it also recognizes that there are additional, more specific steps that could.be taken to further protect, restore and/or enhance the water quality of downstream sites (EGGW flood control channel, Bolsa Chica wetlands restoration area, Huntington Harbour, and Anaheim Bay Wildlife Refuge)that will be effected by runoff generated by development of the site. The proposed amendment could not be found consistent with Sections 30230 and 30231 of the Coastal Act, if feasible measures known to positively impact water quality were not included in language specific to the subject site as part of the current amendment proposal. The Commission's standard of review, which requires the preservation, protection, and enhancement of coastal resources including water quality, necessitates that the additional measures, outlined above, be imposed. Thus, the Commission finds that only if modified as suggested is the proposed amendment consistent with Sections 30230 and 30231 of the Coastal Act regarding water quality. 6. Public Access and Recreation Section 30210 of the Coastal Act states: In carrying out the requirement of Section 4 of Article X of the California Constitution, maximum access, which shall be conspicuously posted, and recreational opportunities shall be provided for all the people consistent with public safety needs and the need to protect public rights, rights of private property owners, and natural resource areas from overuse. Section 30252 of the Coastal Act states, in pertinent part: The location and amount of new development should maintain and enhance public access to the coast by... (3).providing nonautomobile circulation within the development, (4)providing adequate parking facilities orproviding substitute means of serving the development with public transportation, ... (6) assuring that the. recreational needs of new residents will not overload nearby coastal recreation areas by correlating the amount of development with local park acquisition and development plans with the provision of onsite recreational facilities to serve the new development. Coastal Act Section 30212.5 states: Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 51 Wherever appropriate and feasible, public facilities, including parking areas or facilities, shall be distributed throughout an area so as to mitigate against impacts, social and otherwise, of overcrowding or overuse by the public in any single area. Coastal Act Section 30213 states, in pertinent part: Lower cost visitor and recreational facilities shall be protected, encouraged, and, where feasible,provided. Developments providing public recreational opportunities are preferred. Coastal Act Section 30223 states: Upland areas necessary to support coastal recreational uses shall be reserved for such uses, where feasible. In addition, the City's certified LUP contains the following policies regarding public access: Provide coastal resource access opportunities for the public where feasible and in accordance with the California Coastal Act requirements. Encourage the use of City and State beaches as a destination point for bicyclists, pedestrians, shuttle systems and other non-auto oriented transport. Encourage the utilization of easements and/or rights-of-way along flood control channels, public utilities, railroads and streets, wherever practical, for the use of bicycles and/or pedestrian (emphasis added). Maintain existing pedestrian facilities and require new development to provide pedestrian walkways and bicycle routes between developments. Link bicycle routes with pedestrian trails and bus routes to promote an F interconnected system. Develop a riding and hiking trail network and support facilities that provide linkages within the Coastal Zone where feasible and appropriate. Balance the supply of parking with the demand for parking. Maintain an adequate supply of parking that supports the present level of demand and allow for the expected increase in private transportation use. Maintain and enhance, where feasible, existing shoreline and coastal resource access sites. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 52 Promote and provide, where feasible, additional public access, including handicap access, to the shoreline and other coastal resources. Promote public access to coastal wetlands for limited nature study, passive recreation and other low intensity uses that are compatible with the sensitive nature of these areas. Maintain and enhance, where necessary, the coastal resource signing program that identifies public access points, bikeways, recreation areas and vista points throughout the Coastal Zone. Preserve, protect and enhance, where feasible, existing public recreation sites in the Coastal Zone. Ensure that new development and uses provide a variety of recreational facilities for a range of income groups, including low cost facilities and activities. Encourage, where feasible, facilities, programs and services that increase and enhance public recreational opportunities in the Coastal Zone. Promote and support the implementation of the proposed lintersburg Channel Class I Bikeway. The provision of public access in new development proposals is one of the main tenets of the Coastal Act. This emphasis has been carried over into the City's certified LUP. In certifying the LUP, the Commission recognized, via the approved LUP policies, the importance of including measures such as providing and enhancing public access to the sea and other coastal resources, adequate parking and alternate means of transportation, low cost recreational uses, and public access signage, with new development. The 50-acre site is located in close proximity to the Bolsa Chica wetlands restoration area (see exhibit BBBB). The Bolsa Chica Wetlands, at approximately 1,000 acres;is the largest remaining wetland in Southern California. Because it is Wally influenced, the Bolsa Chica wetlands constitute"sea" according to the Coastal Act definition (Section 30115). Because there is no public road between the subject site and the Bolsa Chica wetlands, the site is between the sea and the first public road. As such, the area is given special significance with regard to the requirement for the provision of public access. Given the prominence of the adjacent Bolsa Chica wetlands, appropriate public access and passive recreational opportunities must be provided and conspicuously posted. Further, the Coastal Act gives priority to land uses that provide opportunities for enhanced public access, public recreation and lower cost visitor recreational uses. Beyond the Bolsa Chica wetlands restoration area is the Pacific Ocean and its sandy public beaches. Thus,public access across the subject site to the Bolsa Chica area Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 53 would, in turn, facilitate public access, via alternate means of transportation (bicycle and pedestrian), to the ocean beach beyond. It is also worth noting that the visitor serving uses available within the Bolsa Chica reserve (such as walking, nature study, or bird watching) are served by only two small parking areas. One located at the Interpretive Center at the corner of Warner Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway, and the second at about the midway point along the reserve's Pacific Coast Highway frontage. There is no public parking available along Pacific Coast Highway adjacent to the reserve. Thus, the benefits of providing alternate forms of transportation to access the area, such as biking or hiking from inland areas, are substantially increased. The lack of adequate parking to serve the reserve area is also a limiting factor in maximizing public use of the reserve's amenities. Assuring that any future streets within the subject site are public and provide public parking is critical to maximizing public access in the area. It is also important to note that the Brightwater residential development, approved by the Coastal Commission under Coastal Development Permit No. 5-05-020 (Brightwater), is located less than one half mile west of the subject site. That development was originally proposed as a private, guard gated community. However, as approved by the Commission the development will be open to general public vehicular and pedestrian access, also allowing public parking on all subdivision streets. Also, as approved by the Commission the development will include a public trail along the bluff edge of the development, with public paseos and pocket parks throughout (see exhibit BBBB). The Commission's approval also required public access signage. In approving the Brightwater development the Commission found: "The provision of public access in new development proposals is one of the main tenants[sic]of the Coastal Act, especially in conjunction with new development located between the sea and the first public road, such as the subject project. The 225-acre Bolsa Chica Mesa is located between the first public road and the mean high tide of the sea. At roughly 50 ft. above mean sea level, spectacular views of the wetlands and the associated wildlife and uninterrupted views of the Bolsa Chica State Beach and Pacific Ocean are available from the upper bench of the Bolsa Chica Mesa. Santa Catalina Island is also often visible from the project site. The Bolsa Chica Wetlands at approximately 1,000 acres is the largest remaining wetland in Southern Califomia. Following the 1997 State acquisition of most of the remaining wetlands that were under private ownership, a.comprehensive Bolsa Chica wetlands restoration effort is now underway. Given the prominence of the adjacent Balsa Chica wetlands, appropriate public access and passive recreational opportunities must be provided and conspicuously posted. Further, the Coastal Act give.s priority to land uses that provide opportunities for enhanced public access, public recreation and lower cost visitor recreational uses." A trail connection between the Brightwater trail system and the East Garden Grove Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 54 Wintersburg Flood Control Channel levee trail is also anticipated in the future and shown on the approved public access plan for the Brightwater development. The public access trails of the approved Brightwater project link to the trail system along the Bolsa Chica wetlands and beyond. These trails, in addition to providing recreational opportunities also provide significant opportunities for nature study and views of the wetlands and ocean beyond. The Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve public trail system is a public access resource of regional significance. Members of the general public come from throughout the entire County of Orange and beyond to bird watch, hike, or bike the trail system. As the largest remaining wetland in Southern California, the public trail system leading to and within the Bolsa Chica area constitutes a resource of statewide significance. Further, Bolsa Chica State Beach, located across Pacific Coast Highway from the Bolsa Chica wetland area, can be accessed via this trail system. The proposed LUP amendment contains no language to assure public access will be provided throughout the site in conjunction with future site development. Although the certified LUP includes (as listed above)strong public access policies, the proposed LUP amendment does not include any public access language specifically addressing public access needs appropriate for the site, taking into consideration the recreational needs of both the new residents and other users of the adjacent public recreational resources. Specifically identifying the necessity of these provisions in the LUP is especially important at the subject site due to its unique position to link with and expand the very significant public trail systems within the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, the Brightwater development, and the public beaches beyond. In order to assure that access is maximized at the time of future site development, specific language addressing access in the site specific section of the LUP is necessary. As proposed, no such language is included in the LUP amendment. Some specific methods for assuring the provision of public access at the subject site are described further below. a) Bicycle Path The subject site is immediately adjacent to the north.levee of the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Flood Control Channel (EGGWFCC). The County's Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan (the regional bikeways plan for Orange County) identifies a Class I bikeway along the flood control channel. This is also reflected in the City's certified LUP. Figure C- 14,Trails and Bikeways Map in the certified LUP identifies a proposed bikeway along the EGGWFCC adjacent to the site. A letter from the County's Public Facilities & Resources Department dated January 8, 1998 (exhibit J)states: "Regarding the City's proposal to continue the Class I bikeway northerly along the Wintersburg Channel to Graham Street: The County supports this. It would provide an excellent bikeway connection between the City's road system and the off-road wetlands perimeter route. (We suggest referring to this entire route—between Graham Street and PCH—as the Bolsa Chica Bikeway)-" In addition, a letter from the County's Public Facilities & Resources Department, dated Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 55 February 13, 1998 (exhibit J) commenting on a proposed tentative tract map for the subject site, states: "A bicycle trail along the CO5 [East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel] north levee maintenance road will be required." A bike route in this area would provide substantial public access benefits. It is encouraged in existing LUP policies. It would provide a connection between existing inland routes and the Bolsa Chica area and is expected to be extended in the future along the remainder of the EGGWFCC levee adjacent to the Bolsa Chica Restoration area. When such an extension occurs (as is anticipated in the City's LUP and by the County Public Facilities & Resources Department), the bike route would eventually link to the coast. An off road bicycle path already exists along the entire length of the City's ocean fronting beach. A bike path at the subject site and along the remainder of the EGGWFCC would provide a new connection from inland bicycle paths to this coastal path. Not only would such a bicycle path provide substantial public recreational benefits, but it would also improve public access opportunities by providing alternate means of transportation to get to the coast and to the trails within the Bolsa Chica area. The City and the County have both indicated that a bicycle path in this location is desirable and appropriate. However, the proposed LUP amendment does not include any language specific to this site assuring that implementation of the bicycle trail will occur prior to or concurrent with site development. Current LUP policy merely states "promote"and "encourage"the bicycle path's implementation.Therefore there is no assurance that it will be built in a timely manner, or perhaps that it will be built at all. Thus, the amendment as proposed cannot be found to be consistent with Sections 30210, 30213 and 30252 of the Coastal Act regarding maximizing public access. b) Public Streets and Parking In addition, if the residential development that the proposed land use designation would allow were to be a private and/or gated development, public access would not be maximized or enhanced, inconsistent with Sections 30210, 30212.5, 30223 and 30252 of the Coastal Act. All public entry controls such as gates, gate/guard houses or other guarded entry, signage that discourages access and any other restrictions on the general public's entry by and use of any streets or parking areas (e.g. private streets, preferential parking districts, resident-only parking periods/permits, etc.)would constrain the public's ability to access the area proposed as public park as well as the public's ability to access the public bike path along the EGGWFCC levee. In turn, public access to the Bolsa Chica area and ocean beyond would also not be provided. As stated previously, the site is between the first public road and the sea (in this case the Bolsa Chica wetlands). The provision of public parking within the area would allow visitors to begin a bike ride or walk along the levee, through the Bolsa Chica area, and on to the ocean front. Public streets and public parking within the residential area would not only support public recreational use in the vicinity of the subject site but also allow visitors from beyond the immediate vicinity to use the park area, and public recreational and open space resources in the Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 56 Bolsa Chica area. In addition, ungated public streets would facilitate the use of interior public trails within the development. Interior trails would further maximize, support and enhance public access opportunities. Public trails could be established leading from Graham Street to the outer edge of the area recommended to be designated Open Space conservation, and from within the development back onto the bike way along the north levee of the EGGWFCC. Establishing such trails would provide an excellent public access experience consistent with the requirements of Sections 30210, 30212.5, 30213, 30223 and 30252 to maximize and enhance lower cost public recreational and public access opportunity with new development and assure adequate support facilities are provided.The provision of interior trails within a future development at the site would be especially consistent with Section 30252's requirement that non-automobile circulation be provided within the new development. In order to assure that this aspect of public access (the provision of public parking within an ungated residential area with public streets and interior trails) is provided at the time the site is developed, language reflecting this must be incorporated into the LUP. However, no such language is proposed as part of the LUP amendment. Thus the amendment cannot be found to be consistent with Sections 30210, 30212.5,30213, 30223 and 30252 of the Coastal Act regarding maximizing and enhancing public access. c) Provision of Recreation and.Public Access Benefits Residential development of the subject site that would occur pursuant to the proposed amendment would have adverse impacts on public access and recreation unless the above described measures are incorporated into the design of a future project. In order to assure maximum public benefit, the public recreation and access measures would need to be provided in a timely manner. However, nothing in the proposed amendment or in the City's LUP currently requires that lower priority developments (such as residential)be phased to assure the provision of those uses that are a higher priority under the Coastal Act(such as public trails, parks, and parking)occur prior to or concurrent with the lower priority development. Without such a phasing requirement, it is difficult to assure that necessary public benefits would occur in a timely manner,or possibly even at all. Thus, as proposed, the amendment is inconsistent with Sections 30210, 30212.5, 30213 and 30252 of the Coastal Act regarding maximizing and enhancing public recreation and access. Coastal Act Section 30210 requires that public coastal access be maximized. Coastal Act Section 30252 requires that public access be maintained and enhanced through the provision of nonautomobile circulation within the development, adequate parking, and adequate recreational opportunities. These requirements are carried over and re- emphasized in the City's Land Use Plan public access policies. As proposed the LUP amendment would allow significant residential development to occur with no corresponding requirement for public access specific to the site. The site is located between the sea and the first public road. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 57 Although a portion of the site is proposed to be designated park, nothing in the proposed amendment would assure that it would be available to the general public via public streets and trails. The certified LUP identifies a Class I bicycle path along the flood control channel levee at the subject site. However, the proposed amendment makes no reference to the suitability of a bicycle path at the subject site. If a future residential development at the site included gates or private streets, a significant public access opportunity would be lost. In addition, public parking in the area would increase public access opportunities to public resources including the park area, the bicycle path, the public trails of the Brightwater development and to the Bolsa Chica area beyond, as well as, ultimately, to the coast. However, there is nothing in the LUP amendment that would require the residential streets to be open and available to the public. Nor is there any requirement for interior trail connections between Graham Street, any future public park areas, and the bicycle path to areas within the development and beyond. In addition, nothing in the proposed amendment or in the City's LUP requires that lower priority developments (such as residential) be phased to assure provision of associated recreation and public access (such as public trails, parks, and parking) occur prior to or concurrent with the lower priority development. Without such a phasing requirement, it is difficult to assure that Coastal Act high priority uses would occur in a timely manner, or possibly even at all. However, the proposed amendment could be modified such that site specific language in the LUP include reference to the Class I bicycle path along the flood control channel levee, interior trail connections, public parking and access on residential streets. This would allow direct public access throughout the site, the public trails within the Brightwater development and the Bolsa Chica area and to the beach beyond. Furthermore, the proposed amendment could be modified to incorporate a policy requiring phasing of recreation and public access uses prior to or concurrent with lower priority uses. Modifications to accomplish these goals would bring the proposed amendment into conformity with Coastal Act Sections 30210, 30212.5, 30213,30223 and 30252 which require that public access and recreation be maximized and enhanced. Therefore, the Commission finds that only if modified as suggested is the proposed amendment consistent with Sections 30210 and 30252 of the Coastal Act. 7. Visual Resources Section 30251 of the Coastal Act requires that the scenic and visual qualities of coastal areas shall be considered and protected as a resource of public importance. The subject site offers the opportunity to provide public views from the site to the Bolsa Chica wetlands area and toward the ocean beyond. The VFPS would provide an excellent opportunity to provide public views to and along the coast and scenic areas, as required by Section 30251. However, the proposed LUP amendment does not include any discussion regarding provision of public view points in association with development of the site. Future residential development of the site is expected to include a wall separating residential development adjacent to the flood control levee from the anticipated public Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 58 bicycle path along the top of the levee. If such a wall is proposed in the future, it could create adverse impacts to public views along the bicycle path. However, adverse impacts could be minimized by incorporating measures such as open fencing/wall, landscaped screening, use of an undulating or off-set wall footprint, or decorative wall features (such as artistic imprints, etc.), or a combination of these measures. In addition, any such wall should be located upon the private property for which it is intended to provide privacy. The proposed amendment does not provide language to address site specific visual impacts and does not assure that potential visual resources will be protected at the time the site is proposed for development. Therefore the proposed amendment is inconsistent with Section 30252 of the Coastal Act regarding protection of visual resources within the coastal zone and must be denied. However, if the amendment were modified to incorporate measures specific to the site that protect and enhance public views, the amendment would be consistent with Section 30252 of the Coastal Act regarding protection of public views. 8. Archaeological Resources Coastal Act Section 30244 requires that any impacts to significant archaeological resources be reasonably mitigated. The City's certified LUP includes policies which require, among other things, identification of resources and mitigation of any impacts. Significant archaeological resources are known to exist in the project vicinity, and may occur on the subject site. However, the proposed LUP amendment does not include a specific requirement to avoid and/or mitigate archaeological impacts, even though the site is known to be in a potentially significant archaeological area. Without a cross reference in the site specific area discussion of the proposed LUP amendment to the archaeological policies in the LUP, there is no assurance that the potential for archaeological resources to occur on the site will be recognized in conjunction with future development proposals. If the potential for archaeological resources at the site is not recognized in the proposed LUP amendment for the site, application of the policies cited above may be overlooked. The proposed LUP amendment, which specifically addresses the subject site, provides the appropriate _ opportunity to make clear that archaeological resources may be present on this site, and therefore these specific policies must be applied. If the amendment were modified to include a cross reference to the archaeological policies of the LUP, adverse impacts may be avoided and reasonable mitigation for unavoidable impacts could be implemented in conjunction with future site development, consistent with Section 30244 of the Coastal Act. Therefore, the Commission finds that only if modified as suggested, is the proposed amendment consistent with Section 30244 of the Coastal Act which requires that reasonable mitigation be required for adverse impacts to archaeological resources. Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 59 9. Hazards Coastal Act Section 30253 state, in pertinent part: New Development shall. (2) Minimize risks to life and property in areas of high geologic, flood, and fire hazard. (3) Assure stability and structural integrity, and neither create nor contribute significantly to erosion, geologic instability, or destruction of the site or surrounding area or in any way require the construction of protective devices that would substantially alter natural landforms along bluffs and cliffs. The proposed LUP amendment would designate much of the subject site for residential development land use. The Commission's staff geologist has reviewed a great deal of technical information submitted in conjunction with the proposed LUP amendment and related coastal development permit application. Potential geotechnical and hydrological issues are identified in the staff geologist's memo. The staff geologist's memo is attached as exhibit 1, and is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Residential development of the site carries with it certain risks. Although information submitted relative to the related coastal development permit application indicates there are feasible mitigation measures available to minimize the level of risk involved with site development, there is no specific requirement in the proposed amendment to assure that measures necessary for risk reduction would be incorporated into future site development. Without such requirements in the amendment, there is no assurance that risks will be minimized as required by,Section 30253 of the Coastal Act. However, if the amendment were modified to include such a requirement, it would be consistent with.Section 30253 of the Coastal Act. The subject site and much of the surrounding area are susceptible to tidal flooding. Tidal flooding could occur when extreme high tides occur concurrently with storm surge events. According to some studies,the existing tidal flooding risk was increased with the opening of the ocean inlet into the Bolsa Chica Restoration area. Regardless of the cause of the flooding, high tides and storm surge will create tidal flooding. The worst case scenario would occur when high tide and storm surge occurs during failure of the levees of the lower reaches of the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Flood Control Channel (EGGWFCC) (which is possible as the levees are not FEMA certified). Under any of these scenarios, up to 170 acres of inland developed area would be flooded. Consequently, contemplation of any development of the subject site must address this flooding issue. With or without development of the subject site, the inland 170 acres of existing development must be protected from flood hazard.. The path the tidal flooding would follow unavoidably crosses the subject site. The only way to adequately insure protection of the a Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 60 inland 170.acres of existing development is to install a flood protection levee (a.k.a. VFPF) on the subject site or to the southwest of the subject site within the Bolsa Chica "Pocket Wetlands" between the EGGWFCC and the Bolsa Chica mesa. Protection of the inland 170 acres would also protect the 50 acre subject site from flooding. The property owner has indicated, in documents submitted with the related coastal development permit application, that a vegetated flood protection feature (VFPF) is proposed. The EGGWFCC is approximately 11 feet above sea level and the bluff at the western site boundary raises some 40 feet above sea level. A flood protection levee at this site could effectively capture tidal floods if it is constructed to an elevation above the expected flood flow. The existing EGGWFCC levee in the area adjacent to the subject site is expected to be reconstructed to meet FEMA certification standards and would have an elevation of 11 feet above sea level (the existing levee's elevation is also 11 feet above sea level). If a flood protection levee were constructed to the same elevation, flood waters would be prevented from flooding the subject site as well as the additional 170 inland acres. With or without development of the proposed site, some form of flood protection is necessary to minimize risks to life and property in areas of high flood hazard and to assure stability and structural integrity, and not contribute significantly to destruction of the surrounding area. As it happens, the subject site provides the optimum location for the flood protection levee necessary to minimize risk to life and property in the 170 developed acres inland of the subject site. Construction of some type of flood protection levee would be necessary with development of the subject site. However, such a feature would be necessary even without site development. The flood protection levee, expected to be constructed as an earthen levee with an internal sheet pile wall, would serve an important function. Without construction of the flood protection levee, even with reconstruction of the north levee of the EGGWFCC along the subject site, flooding of 170 inland acres (including the subject site)would result, during either a tidal surge or a levee failure downstream of the subject site. The 170 acre inland area is developed with approximately 800 homes. Floodwater depth in some homes, it is estimated,would be at least two feet. However,construction of a flood protection levee on the site would be adequate to assure structural integrity; and neither create nor contribute significantly to erosion, geologic instability, or destruction of the site or surrounding area. In addition, construction of the flood protection levee would minimize risks to life and property from flood hazard. In order for the flood protection levee to function effectively, it would have to be placed within the site's necessary buffer areas. However, as described previously, a flood protection levee in the ESHA or wetland buffer area may be allowable use within a buffer provided it is the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative. Furthermore, the construction of the flood protection levee may eliminate the need for the flood control levee downstream-of the flood wall. If the flood control levee downstream of the flood wall is not reconstructed, potential impacts to Wetlands in the CP wetland area can be avoided. The appropriateness of reconstructing the downstream levee area will be i Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 61 considered when the related coastal development permit is processed. It should be noted that an emergency coastal development permit was issued to the County of Orange to install sheet pile within the north levee of the flood control channel adjacent to the subject site. However, the County has indicated it is willing to consider alternatives that limit changes to the levee downstream if such an alternative is deemed feasible and environmentally desirable. Construction methods proposed by the County to install the sheetpiles will not involve any wetland fill. Impacts to coastal resources may occur which will be addressed in the follow-up permit. The question of whether the bluff along the western edge of the property should be considered a"coastal bluff" has been raised. The Commission's staff geologist has evaluated the bluffs status. The staff geologist's evaluation is contained in a memorandum attached as exhibit P. The subject bluff was carved by the ancestral Santa Ana river as it meandered across the Bolsa Chica lowlands. Assertions have been made that the bluff was subject to marine erosion within the past 200 years based on an 1873 T- sheet that shows tidal channels adjacent to the toe of the bluff. The staff geologist's response to these assertions is: "1 concur that there is strong evidence that there were tidal wetlands in the Bolsa Chica lowlands prior to dike construction in the early twentieth century, but tidal wetlands generally are not the site of extensive marine erosion. Indeed, they are commonly depositional, not erosional, and serve as an efficient buffer from marine erosion." The staff geologist concludes: "In summary, 1 believe that the bluff at the Shea Home property is best described as a river bluff and is not a coastal bluff in a genetic or geomorphic sense." Thus, the Commission finds that the bluff on the subject site is not a "coastal bluff." For the reasons described above, the Commission finds that only if modified can the proposed amendment be found to be consistent with Section 30253 of the Coastal Act which requires that risks to life and property be minimized and that development assure stability and structural integrity, and neither create nor contribute significantly to-erosion, geologic instability, or destruction of the site or surrounding area. 10. Priority of Use Section 30222 of the Coastal Act states: The use of.private lands suitable for visitor-serving commercial recreational facilities designed to enhance public opportunities for coastal recreation shall have priority over private residential, general industrial, or general commercial development, but not over agriculture or coastal-dependent industry. The LUP amendment does not propose to designate any portion of the site visitor serving commercial. Generally, in the City of Huntington Beach, the areas recognized as best for visitor serving commercial development are the areas along Pacific Coast Highway, and adjacent to and inland of the pier, and areas within and around Huntington Harbour. The subject site is surrounded on three sides by existing single family residences, and does not Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 62 lend itself to visitor serving commercial development. Moreover, the LUP amendment as proposed and as amended will provide a Class I bicycle path, a public view area, public park area, and interior trails as well as public parking along the residential streets. Such uses constitute lower cost visitor serving recreational uses. As modified the recreational and public access provisions will be constructed prior to or concurrent with the residential uses. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed LUP amendment is consistent with Sections 30213 and 30222 of the Coastal Act which requires visitor serving commercial recreational facilities have priority over residential development and encourages provision of lower cost public recreational facilities. 11. Conclusion As proposed, the Land Use Plan amendment contains significant deficiencies with regard to consistency with the Coastal Act. As proposed, the amendment cannot be found consistent with Sections 30210 and 30252 regarding maximizing and enhancing public access, 30251 regarding protection of public views, 30233 and 30250 regarding wetlands, 30240 regarding ESHA, 30244 regarding archaeological resources, and 30230 and 30231 regarding water quality of the Coastal Act. However, if the proposed amendment were modified as suggested in Section II of this staff report, the amendment would be consistent with the Chapter 3 policies of the Coastal Act. Therefore, the Commission finds that only if modified is the proposed amendment consistent with the Chapter 3 policies of the Coastal Act. IV. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Section 21080.9 of the California Public Resources Code—within the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)-exempts local governments from the requirement of preparing an environmental impact report (EIR) in connection with its activities and approvals necessary for the preparation and adoption of a local coastal program (LCP). Instead,the CEQA responsibilities are assigned to the Coastal Commission. However, the Commission's LCP review and approval program has been found by the Resources Agency to be functionally equivalent to the EIR process. Thus, under Section 21080.5.of z CEQA, the Commission is relieved of the responsibility to prepare an EIR for each LCP. Nevertheless, the Commission is required in approving an LCP submittal to find that the LCP does conform with the provisions of CEQA, including the requirement in CEQA section 21080.5(d)(2)(A)that the amended 1P LUP will not be approved or adopted as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen.any significant adverse impact which the activity may have on the environment. 14 C.C.R. Sections 13542(a), 13540(f), and 13555(b). The City of Huntington Beach LCP amendment 1-06 consists of an amendment to nth the Land Use Plan (LUP) on/v and As outlined in this staff report, the LUP amendment is not consistent with the Chapter 3 ` Adopted Findings: (Approval of LUP with Modifications) 0 Huntington Beach LCP Amendment 1-06 (Parkside) Page 63 polices of the Coastal Act regarding public access and recreation, wetland, ESHA, marine resources, and land resources, as proposed. --yult/W.-add in thir. staff Fen However, if modified as suggested, the amendment will be consistent with the public access and recreation, wetland, ESHA, marine resource, and land resource policies of the Coastal Act sand4he sq Pfau, as _amended Thus, the Commission finds that the proposed LUP amendment, as modified, meets the requirements of and conforms with the Chapter 3 policies of the Coastal Act. W addition- ".^ ''^-Y°—' that the IP �--•^�^'�^^* th _ OiEthq Therefore, the Commission finds that approval of the kGR LUP amendment as modified will not result in significant adverse environmental impacts under the meaning of CEQA. Therefore, the Commission certifies LGP LUP amendment request 1-06 if modified as suggested herein. HN8 LCPA 1-06 Parkside AdptdF 5.08 my APPENDIX P REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - 2008 PARKSIDE ESTATES ADDENDUM EIR REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR ,SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italies"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 1. Prior to recordation of a final tract map, the applicant N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A The affordable units are currently off-site must satisfy the City's policy requiring 10 percent of within the City, therefore the Mitigation proposed units to he a%fordable.This requirement must he Measure has been satisfied_ satisfied to the discretion of the City Department of Planning through one of the following methods: a. Par a fee to the City,ifsuch a process is available; b. Participate with other developers or a non-profit organization to acquire and/or rehabilitate existing apartment onus at any of location within a suitable area and provide ,for continued affordabdity;or C. Provide the required affordable units at one ofShea Homes'future multi-family proyeels within the City of Huntington Beach. This mitigation measure has been satisfied. The proposed project, in conjunction with N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A other past,present,and reasonably foreseeable future projects, may result in inconsistencies Mitigation Measure I above has been implemented. with the City's Affordable Housing Policy. AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE I. Prior to approval of building permits,the applicant shall Prior to approval Applicant Plan Check City option Planning The City-approved/CCC-revised may be provide proof of incorporation of City comments / ofbuilding to Department perceived as having a substantial, conditions related to the overall proposed design and permit implement demonstrable,negative aesthetic effect due to layout of buildings, and landscaping. This design and as Deeded the reduction of viewable open space areas. layout of buildings shall be approved by the City Department of Planning. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check Once upon Planning submit a landscaping plan for the area outside the ofbuilding completion Department perimeter wall along Graliam Street to be reviewed and permits approved by the City Department of Planning. 1 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-,APPROVED/200S CCC- Those measures in"italies"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. 'File City-approved/CCC-revised project would 3. Prior to approval gf building permits,the applicant shall N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A not result in the removal of eucalyptus trees provide a Landscape Plan to he approved br the and therefore mitigation measure 3 would not Department of Public Works and the Department of be required. Planning, which includes the replacement of all mature trees on the site at a 2 1 ratio with 36-inch box trees. This measure was not applicable to 2002 approved or revised project. No eucalyptus trees will be removed. The proposed project may result in impacts to 4. Prior to approval of building permits,the applicant shall Prior to approval Applicant Plan Check Once upon Planning County-proposed trails submit a bikeways plan to the City of Huntington Beach of building completion Department Planning Department,in consultation with the Manager permit of the County PFRD/HBP Program Management and Coordination, for approval of consistency with the Orange County Bikeway Plan, LIGHT AND GLARE I. Prior to the approval of building permits,the applicant Prior to approval Applicant Plan Check Once upon Planning and On-Site shall prepare a plan,which shows the proposed height, of building completion Public Works location,and intensity of street lights on-site. The plan permits Department The project's development will increase the shall comply with minimum standards for roadway generation of light and glare on-site with on- lighting,and shall be reviewed and approved by the City site vehicle-related increases. In addition,the Planning and Public Works Departments, proposed project may result in an impact on the surrounding residential developments 2. Prior to the approval of building permits, if outdoor Prior to approval Applicant Plan Check City option primarily to the north,and to some extent,to lighting is to be included, energy saving lamps shall be ofbuilding to the east. used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent permits implement "spillage"onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on as needed the site plan and elevations. 3. Non-reflective materials shall be utilized to the extent Prior to approval Applicant Plan Check City option feasible. Individual building site plans shall be reviewed of building to and approved by the City Planning and Public Works permits implement Department. as needed Off-Site Lighting from the proposed development may Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 above shall be implemented. result in light and glare impacts to adjacent off-site uses. 2 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION I. Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the applicant shall Prim to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option City Engineer The proposed project will result ill short-term coordinate with the City of Huntington Beach in developing of grading Review to implement construction related impacts due to the addition a truck and construction vehicle routing plan(including dirt permits as needed of trick and construction vehicle traffic. import haul route). This plan shall specify the hours in Depending on the location of the haul route, which transport activities can occur and methods to traffic impacts along the selected route may minnmize construction related impacts to adjacent occur. residences. The final plan shall be approved by the City En<*ineer. The proposed project may result in impacts to 2. Prior to the final inspection,the applicant shall construct a During Applicant Final inspection Once upon City Engineer pedestrian,bicycle,and vehicular safety related traffic signal and improve the intersection at the proposed construction completion to the establishment of access and an on-site "A"Street and Graham Street circulation system, " 3. Prior to the issuance of building pennits,the applicant shall Prior to issuance Applicant Construction Once upon City Engineer demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer of building Review completion that standards(including ADA)regarding pedestrian/bicycle pennits safety along the perimeter sidewalks will be met. 4. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall be During Applicant Final inspection Once upon City Engineer responsible for restriping Graham Street from Glenstone to Construction completion the project access("A"Street)as follows: Two 7 foot bikelanes;one 12'through lane in each direction,and a 14'two-way left turning median. Additionally,the applicant shall be responsible for restriping Graham Street from "A" street to Warner Avenue, as follows: Two 7 foot bikelanes,one 18'through lane in each direction,and a 14'two-way left turning mediae. The improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer. 3 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. The proposed project in conjunction with other 5 Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall pay the Prior to issuance Applicant Building permit City option City Engineer past,present,and reasonably foreseeable future applicable Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) for the City of ofbuilding issuance to implement projects will result in level of service Huntington Beach. The actual allocation shall be permits as needed deficiencies at the intersections Bolsa Chica approved by the City.Appropriate credits shall be granted Street and Warner Avenue and Graham Street toward the TIF. The TIF shall cover the project's fair and Warner Avenue under the year 2020 share of year 2020 improvements to the arterial street condition. system Such as: • Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue — reconfigure intersection for east/west traffic to provide dual left turns and either three throughs or two throughs and an exclusive right tum lane. This deficiency is a product of cumulative growth and not a direct result ofthe proposed project. • Graham Street/Wamer Avenue — reconfigure intersection to provide an exclusive southbound right turn lane from Graham Street to Warner Avenue.This deficiency is a product of cumulative growth and not a direct result of the proposed project. AIR QUALITY 1. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be During goading Applicant Grading/ City option Planning and "fire proposed project is anticipated to exceed responsible for compliance with the following: and construction Inspection to implement Public Works SCAQMD's daily threshold emission levels for as needed Departments NO,druing construction activities. Further,the A. During clearing, grading, earth moving, or addition of emissions to an air basin designated excavation, maintain equipment engines in proper as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to time. be a significant impact. B After clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation: 1) Wet the area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary,to maintain the crust and prevent dust pick up by the wind. 2) Spread soil binders;and 3) Implement street sweeping as necessary. 4 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable, C. During construction: 1) Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site, 2) Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; 3) Use low sulfiu fuel (.05% by weight) for construction equipment. D. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days. E. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 2. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be During grading Applicant Grading/ City option planning and responsible for compliance with the following (or other and construction Inspection to Pubic Works reasonably equivalent measures as required by the City implement Depatttnents Engineer): as needed A. Require a phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily emissions. B. Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods, C. Treat unattended construction areas with water (disturbed lands which have been,or are expected to be unused for four or more consecutive days). D, Require the planting of vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on construction sites. E. Install vehicle wheel-washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites. F. Wash offbucks leaving site. G. Require all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose substances and building materials to be covered, or to maintain a minimum freeboard of two feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. H, Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion from storm water especially on super pads. 1. Require enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of sand,dirt,or other aggregate materials. 5 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"Italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. J. Control off-road vehicle travel by posting driving speed limits on these roads, consistent with City standards. K. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators when practical. 3. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be During grading Applicant Grading/ City option Planning/ responsible for assuring that vehicle movement on any and construction Construction to Public Works unpaved surface other than water pucks shall be Review implement Depaltrnents terminated ifwind speeds exceed 15 mph. as needed 4. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be During grading Applicant Grading/ City option Planning/ responsible for the paving of all access aprons to the and construction Inspection to Public Works project site and the maintenance of the paving. implement Departments as needed 5. Prior to issuance of grading permits,the applicant shall be Prior to issuance Applicant Grading/ City option Planning/ responsible for assuring that construction vehicles be ofgrading Inspection to Public Works equipped with proper emission control equipment to permits implement Departments substantially reduce emissions. as needed 6. Prior to issuance of grading permits,the applicant shall be Prior to issuance Applicant Grading/ City option Planning/ responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce of grading Inspection to Public Works construction related traffic congestion into the project permits implement Departments grading permit. Measures, subject to the approval and as needed verification by the Public Works Department,shall include, as appropriate: Provision of rideshare incentives. Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. 6 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PRO.IECT applicable. The City-approved/CCC-revised project would 7. Prior to the final inspection..the applicant shall provide Prior to issuance Applicant Building permit City option Planning arid not exceed SCAQMD's daily threshold emission proof to the City's Traffic Engineer that the project has of building issuance to Public Works levels for CO and ROC, however mitigation contributed its `fair-share' towards regional traffic permits implement Departments measures 7&8 would still apply to reduce the improvement systems (i.e., traffic impact fees) for the as needed alternative project's long-term incremental area. This shall include efforts to synchronize traffic contribution to the air quality impact. lights on streets impacted by project development. 8 Prior to the final inspection,the applicant shall provide Prior to plan Applicant Final inspection City option Planning and proof that energy saving features have been installed in check to Public Works project homes as required by the Uniform Building Code. implement Departments Features may include: solar or low-emission water as needed heaters, energy efficient appliances, double-glass paned windows,low-sodium parking lights,etc. The proposed project,in conjunction with other past,present,and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will result in a short-term air quality impact due to construction activities. The Mitigation Measures t through 6 above shall be implemented. addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to he a significant impact. The proposed project,in conjunction with other past,present,and reasonabl} foreseeable future projects. will result in significant cumulative Mitigation Measures 7 and 8 above shall be implemented. long-tern impacts to air quality, NOISE 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits,the applicant shall Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option Planting The proposed project has the potential to result submit and have approved a noise mitigation plan to the of grading Review to Department in significant short-term noise impacts during Department of Planning that will reduce or mitigate short- permits implement exterior and interior construction activities. term noise impacts to nearby noise sensitive. The plan as needed shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance and shall include,but not be limited to: A. A criteria of acceptable noise levels based on type and length of exposure to construction noise levels; B. Physical reduction measures such as temporary noise barriers that provide separation between the source and the receptor, temporary soundproof strictures to house portable generators,and C. Tempera enerators(ifutilized)shall be located as 7 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"itteiics"have been met or are Hot REVISED PROJECT applicable. far as practical front sensitive noise receptors. D. Mitigation measures such as restrictions on the time of construction for activities resulting in high noise levels. 2. Prior to issuance of grading pennits, the applicant shall Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option City Engineer produce evidence acceptable to the City Engineer that: of grading Review/ to permits Construction implement A. All grading and constriction vehicles and Review as needed equipment, fixed or mobile,shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation. B. Stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. C. All operations shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. Based on the distance of on-site and off-site 3, Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A homes to the park and the barriers included as produce evidence (specifications) acceplahle to the Cav part of the recommended project(i_e.,passive that the new walls, if constructed, along; the project's Pasco park and slope), the proposed northern property (along the rear properly line of lot recommended project is not anticipated to H103 to lot 1`123 nn Kenilworlh Drive and the side result in significant noise impacts from property lines oflots H125 and H126 on GreenlegfLane of recreational activities at the proposed park site. Tract 5792) will he constructed to achieve maximum sound allenualion. This mitigation measure is no longer applicable to the revised project due to CCC suggested modifications that reduced active park from 8.4 acres to 1.6 acres. 3b. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option Planning produce evidence(specifications)acceptable to the City of grading Review/ to Department that the new walls, if constructed, along Graham Street permits Construction implement (along the project's boundary adjacent to the proposed Review as needed homes)will be construction to achieve maximum sound attenuation. The proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable fixture projects will not result in a significant Mitigation Measure 3 above is no longer applicable to revised incremental increase(0.8 dBA)in traffic noise project. 8 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC. Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. levels in the year 2020.Noise levels in excess of G5 CNEL are not anticipated considering the sound reduction effects of the proposed wall along the northern property line and along Graham Street. EARTH RESOURCES 1. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option City Engineer Significant settlements of peat deposits within recommendations contained in Section 7.0 of the of a grading Review to the upper 5 feet could continue over the design geotechnical study, located in Appendix E of the EIR permit implement life of the structures without mitigation in the shall be incorporated into the earthwork activities of the as needed form of removal and/or surcharge, proposed project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Earthwork activities include grading, clearing and demolition, site preparation, unsuitable soil removals, backcuts,excavation processing,compaction of all fills, mixing, benching, inspection, survey control; subgrade preparation, cut and till slope construction, haul roads, import soils, structural load and settlement/subsidence measures,and storm drain relocation. 2. Met to the issuance of a building pennit, the Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check City option City Engineer recommendations contained in Section 8.0 of the of building to geotechnical study,located in Appendix E of the FIR,shall permit implement be incorporated into the structural design of the proposed as needed project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Structural design activities include: Foundation Design; Settlements including Foundation Loads and Seismically Induced Settlements; Post-Tensioned Slab/ Foundations; Mat Foundations;Other Foundation Recommendations such as Footing Embedment, Underslab Treatment, and Subgrade Moisture Content; Concrete Dnveways, Sidewalks, and Flatwork; Structural Setbacks; Retaining Walls; Other Designs and Construction Recommendations such as Lot Drainage, Utility Excavations, Utility Trench Backfill, Corrosion,Metallic Structures,and Concrete Structures. The potential exists for significant impacts from the on-site mildly to severely corrosive Mitigation Measures I and 2 above shall be implemented. soils, soils with poor pavement support characteristics. low shear strength, and shrinkage. 9 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italiec"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. Potential impacts may result from ground Mitigation Measures I and 2 above,and Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check City option Building and shaking. ofbuilding to Safety 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit,it shall be proven permit implement Department to the Department of Building and Safety that all as needed structures are designed in accordance with the seismic design provisions of the Uniform Building Codes or Structural Engineers Association of California to promote safety in the event of an earthquake. Potential impacts may result associated with Mitigation Measure 1 above shall be implemented. Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement The proposed local dewatenng may result in 4. Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the applicant shall Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option Public Works subsidence of adjacent properties along the contract with a dewatering expert to prepare a detailed ofgrading Review to Department project's northern property boundary. Dewatering Plan.This plan shall include the placement of permits implement monitoring wells near the northern property line to evaluate as needed ground water levels during the proposed project dewatering activities. The dewatering activities shall be adjusted immediately if the monitoring wells show ground water level changes which may effect subsidence of adjacent properties. The Dewatering Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. Groundwater impacts may occur. Mitigation Measure 4 above shall be implemented. The potential exists for impacts from 5. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, Phase 11 Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option Public Works hazardous materials to occur. environmental soil sampling shall be conducted to of a grading Review to Department determine the residual levels of pesticides in the soil. If permit implement inappropriate/unsafe levels are identified by this analysis, as needed "clean up" measures shall be recommended and implemented. The Phase II sampling and any necessary measures shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. 6. Prior to the final inspection, testing to verify the During Applicant Final inspection City option Planning estimated radon gas levels shall be implemented as construction to Department deemed necessary by the Department of Planning. implement as needed DRAINAGE/HYDROLOGY The proposed project may result in potential I. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project Prior to issuance Applicant Building Permit City option Public Works impacts to drainage. applicant shall implement conditions of the Public Works ofbuilding Review to Department Department regarding storm drainage improvements permits implement 10 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. which shall include,but not be limited to: as needed • Construct the necessary storm drainage improvements(identified on Exhibit 42 within the EIR)to handle increased flows and intercept off-site flows. Ensure that future building pads are placed at elevations suitable to withstand 100-year flood. • Construct the necessary improvements to the East Garden Grove—Wintersburg Channel (C05)along the site's developed edge. The proposed project may result in potential Mitigation Measure I above shall be implemented. impacts associated with flooding. The proposed project may result in potential 2. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option City Engineer impacts to water quality. shall submit a"Notice of Intent"(NOI),along with the of grading Review to required fee to the State Water Resources Control Board permits implement to be covered under the State NPDES General as needed Construction permit and provide the City with a copy of the written reply containing the discharger's identification number. 3. Prior to the issuance of the grading permits,the applicant Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option City Engineer shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan showing of grading Review to conformance to the Orange County Drainage Area permits implement Management Plan and all NPDES requirements(enacted as needed by the EPA) for review and approval by the City Engineer. The plan shall reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practical using management practices, control techniques and systems, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions which are appropriate. The proposed project would contribute to potential cumulative drainage, flooding, and Mitigation Measures I through 3 above shall be implemented. water quality impacts. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 1. If project grading construction is scheduled during the Prior to Applicant Grading Permit City option Planning The proposed project may result in impacts to normal breeding season for red-tailed hawk and other issuance of Review to Department affected species locally and regionally. raptors locally (February to July), a survey shall be grading permits implement conducted for active nests. Prior to the issuance of as needed 11 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. grading; permits, should any active nests be located within the zone of potential disturbance, construction activities shall be limited to areas 500 feet away from the nest until the young have fledged and have begun foraging away from the nest site.The 500 foot protection zone shall be fenced with visible warning-color materials. Nest trees shall be removed during the non- breeding season only. 2. ld'edand impacts to the isolated pocket wetlands shall he N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A The"odumally"proposed project may result mitigated al a ratio of 3 1(square footage ofwedands to in potential impacts to pocket wetland habitats square footage of fill). The Coastal Development permit on the County parcel. shall require that mitigation for the fill of the pocket wellaods he implemented prior to the issuance of a The City-approved/CCC-revised would not grading permit for the County Parcel. the mhiganon result in removal impacts to the County parcel site shall be on-.site or within the Bol.so Chica Lowlands wetland habitats and therefore mitigation unless the Lowlands are sold to a new landowner and measurc2 would not be required. the new landowner is unwilling to allow the proposed mitigation to proceed. In such a case, the developer of the site shall find an alternative mitigation site.The total mitigation for the loss of two small patches of degraded pickleweed habitat shall include the preservation and enhancement of 2 acres of appropriate wildlife habital per the Department of Fish and Game. This mitigation measure was not applicable to 2002 approved or revised project. There will be no development within the County parcel. The project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future Mitigation Measure 2 above is no longer applicable. projects, will incremental]}, contribute to the cumulative loss ofbiological resources. 12 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. CULTURAI.RESOURCES 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Pernut City option Planning The proposed project may result in a significant conduct a subsurface test investigation for CA-0RA-1308 of grading Review to implement Director impact on archaeological sites CA-ORA-1308 and 1309 to determine the horizontal boundaries of the sites permit as needed and 1309. as well as to confirm the surface conclusions of non- significance as indicated in the March, 1997 Archeological Assessment. This may be accomplished through the mechanical excavation of a number of auger holes as well as two lxl-meter hand excavated units for stratigraphic control. The subsurface test investigation,which includes discussion of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of resources),final mitigation recommendations,and coast estimate,shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option Planning create(if deemed necessary through Measure 1 above)a of grading Review to Director cultural resource management plan based on test results.A permit implement fill data recovery program shall be designed if site as needed avoidance is not feasible through design.Possible recovery plans include,but are not limited to,preservation,salvage, partial salvage,or no mitigation necessary.The plan shall include consultation with the appropriate Native American Organization and be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director.Additionally,the plan shall require peer review in conformance with the Coastal Conmuission's Archeological Guidelines. 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the applicant shall Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Pemlit City option Planning provide written evidence that a certified archaeologist has of grading Review to Director been retained,shall be present at the pre-grading meeting/ Permit implement conference, shall establish procedures for archaeological as needed resource surveillance, and shall establish, in cooperation with the project proponent, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to pennit the sampling, identification,and evaluation of the artifacts as appropriate. The archeological resource surveillance procedures shall include a provision for Native American review of grading operations. If additional or unexpected archaeological features are discovered, the archeologist shall report such findings to the applicant and to the Department of Planning and the appropriate Native American Organization, If the 13 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. archaeological resources are found to be sigluficant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the applicant, for exploration and/or salvage. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources,shall he subject to the approval ofthe Planning Director. The proposed project in conjunction with other past,present_and reasonably foreseeable figure projects will incrementally contribute to the Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 above shall be implemented. cumulative loss of potentially signiticant cultural resources. PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES Fire Implementation of the above measures will l. Prior to approval of building permits,building plans shall Prior to approval Applicant Plan Check City option Fire mitigate all prolect-specific impacts to public be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department.If of building to Department services and utilities to a level less than during the Fire Departments plan check it becomes permits implement significant evident that firelpound operations will become impeded, as needed the department will impose additional fire code requirements in addition to the automatic sprinkler systems,alarm systems,access roads,etc. Police 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Police Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check City option Police Department shall be consulted during preliminary stages ofbuilding to Department of the project design to review the safety features, permits implement determine their adequacy,and suggest improvements. as needed 3. During construction and at complete buildout,the project During Applicant Construction Once upon Police shall provide easy access into and within the project site construction and completion Department for emergency vehicles and addresses shall be well at complete marked to facilitate response by officers.Prior to the first buildout and final inspection, project site plans depicting these during plan requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the check Police Department. Schools 4. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check Once upon Planning provide school fees to mitigate conditions of ofbuilding completion Department overcrowding as part of building permit application. permits These fees shall be based on the State fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit applications. 14 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITV-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check Once upon Planning show proof of compliance with the Mitigation Agreement of building completion Department established between the Huntington Beach Union High permits School District, subject to the approval of the City of Huntington Beach. Water 6. Prior to issuance of grading permits,the developer shall Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option Public Works submit a hydraulic computer water model analysis for the of grading Review to Department development proposed on the City parcel, which permits implement addresses the following: as needed a. Water demand required by protect (fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Department) b. Master Plan/General Plan Amendment(GPA)review The City of Huntington Beach Water(Master Plan) System Computer Model(i.e. H2ONET)must be run with the proposed land use demands(i.e.CPA),and contrasted with the model run using the existing land use demands, (i.e. the General Plan, in effect at the time the Water Master Plan was adopted). The City of Huntington Beach Water Division must be contracted to perform this analysis on the existing City of Huntington Beach Water System Model (1-12ONET),for a fee to be paid by the developer a minimum of 30 days in advance. If the analysis shows that project demands cannot be met with the City's current water system,the developer shall be required to upgrade the City's system to meet the demands and/or otherwise mitigate the impacts of the project at no cost to the City. 7. Prior to final inspection,the following water conservation Plan Check Applicant Final inspection Once upon Public Works measures shall be implemented as required by state law: completion Department a. Ultra-low-flush toilets b. Ultra-low-flow showers and faucets c. Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating systems d. Compliance with water conservation provisions of the appropriate plumbing code 15 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. 8. Prior to final inspection issuance, water pressure Plan Check Applicant Final inspection Once upon Public Works regulators to limit downstream pressure to a maximum of completion Department 60 psi shall be installed. 9. Prior to issuance of building permits, pervious paving Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check Once upon Public Works material shall be used whenever feasible to reduce surface of building completion Department water runoff and aid in groundwater recharge and slopes permit and grades shall he controlled to discourage water waste through runoff. 10. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall provide CC&R review Applicant Prior to final Once upon Public Works information to prospective residents regarding benefits of map recordation completion Department low water use landscaping and sources of additional assistance in selecting irrigation and landscaping. IL The Water Division and Park, Tree, and Landscape During design Applicant Plan Check/ City option Public Works Division of the City's Public Works Department shall be and construction Construction to Department consulted during design and construction of the Park for implement further water conservation measures to review irigation as needed designs and drought tolerant plant use, as well as measures that may be incorporated into the project to reduce peak hour water demand. 12. Prior to issuance of grading permits,the developer shall Prior to issuance Applicant Grading Permit City option Public Works submit a hydraulic computer water model analysis for the of grading Review to Department portion of the project to be developed on the County permit implement parcel,which addresses the following: as needed a. Water demand required by project (fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Department) b. Master Plan/General Plan Amendment(GPA)review The City of Huntington Beach Water(Master Plan) System Computer Model(i.e.H2ONET)must be run with the proposed land use demands(i.e.GPA),and contrasted with the model run using the existing land use demands,(i.e.the General Plan,in effect at the time the current Water Master Plan was adopted). The City of Huntington Beach Water Division must be contracted to perform this analysis on the existing City of Huntington Beach Water System Model (1-12ONET),for a fee to be paid by the developer a 16 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITY-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. minimum of 30 days in advance. The developer shall be required to upgrade the City's system to meet the demands and/or otherwise mitigate the impacts of the project proposed development on the County parcel, at no cost to the City. Any incremental impacts to the City's water system would need to be mitigated to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works-Water Division. The annexation of the County parcel into the 13. Prior to the issuance of huilding permits, for any lot N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A City of Huntington Beach and to the OCSD within the parcel within the County of Orange, the occurred subsequent to certification of the applicant shall.chow proof from IAI-C'O of approval of Final EIR. Thus, the requirements of annexation of the County parcel into the City of Mitigation Measure 13 have been satisfied, Huntington Beach and the Orange County Sanitation and there is no change in the conclusion of the Dislrict,s)thjeci to the approval of the City Planning and Final EIR that this impact is reduced to below Public Works Departments. a level of significance with implementation of mitigation. This Mitigation Measure has been satisfied. 14. Irrigation systems within the Park,which minimize water Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check City option Planning& waste,shall be used to the greatest extent possible.Such of building to Public Works measures should involve, where appropriate, the permits implement Departruents following features: as needed a. Raised planters and benning in conjunction with closely spaced low volume, low angle (22 degree)sprinkler heads. b. Drip irrigation C. Irrigation systems controlled automatically to ensure watering during early morning or evening hout's to reduce evaporation losses. d. The use of reclaimed water for irrigated areas and grass lands.The project applicants shall connect to the Orange County Water District's"Green Acres" system of reclaimed water should this supply of water be available. Separate irrigation services shall be installed to ease this transition. 15. Landscape and irrigation plans for the Park which Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check Once upon Public Works encourage minimized use of lawns and utilize wann ofbuilding completion Department season,drought tolerant species shall be submitted to and permits approved by the Water Division and Park, Tree, and Landscape Division. 17 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PRASE IMPLEMENTOR PRASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITV-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italies"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. Sewer 16. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the property Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check Once upon Public Works owner(Shea Homes)shall construct the new sewer lift ofbuilding completion Department station and force main in accordance with the City- permits approved Sewer Plan for the proposed project, and implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding sewer infrastructure improvements to handle increased sewer flow demands. Natural Gas 17. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Southern Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check Once upon Public Works California Gas Company or designated natural gas of building completion Department provider shall be consulted with during the building permits design phase for further energy conservation measures Electricity 18. Prior to issuance of building permits, SCE shall be Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check Once upon Public Works consulted with during the building design phase for ofbuilding completion Department further energy conservation measures. permits The proposed project will create increased \litigation Measures I through 18 above shall be demand for public services and utilities on a implemented. local and regional basis. Additionally, the project,in conjunction with other past,present and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will create an increased demand on fire, police, schools, community services, water, sewer,natural gas,and electrical services and facilities. 18 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING, VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITV-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those measures in"italics"have been met or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. FROM INITIAL STUDY/NOP NATURAL RESOURCES/ENERGY I. Building design and construction shall comply with the Prior to approval Applicant Plan Check Once upon Director of The proposed project may result in impacts to Energy Conservation Standards set forth in Title 24 of the ofbuilding completion Building and natural resources and cnergy, California Administrative Code. Prior to approval of permits Safety building permits for the Specific Plan, architectural and engineering plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Building and Safety to ensure conformance with these standards. Energy conservation features should include: • Installation of thermal insulation in walls and ceilings, which meet or exceed State of California,Title 24 requirements. • Insulation of hot water pipes and duct systems. Use of natural ventilation where possible. • Use of natural gas for space heating and cooking.Installation of ventilation devices. • Orientation to sunlight and use ofoverhangs. • Landscaping with deciduous trees, to provide shade in the summer months and allow sunlight through in the winter months. Public Services and Utilities Telephone Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check Once upon Public Works The proposed project may result in impacts ofbuilding completion Department regarding the need for new telephone service 1. Prior to issuance of building pennits,building plans shall permits to the site. be submitted to GTE enabling GTE to assess the improvements necessary to provide adequate service to the project site. The proposed project may result in impacts to Library Prior to issuance Applicant Building Permit Once upon Planning library facilities and services. of building Issuance completion Department 1. The applicant shall provide development fees to mitigate permits conditions of increased demand as part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the City fee schedule in effect at the time of future building permit applications. 19 REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM-2008 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES PHASE IMPLEMENTOR PHASE FREQUENCY MONITOR SIGNATURES DATE 2002 CITV-APPROVED/2008 CCC- Those mcasures in"italics"have been nret or are not REVISED PROJECT applicable. FROM INITIAL STUDY/NOP Solid Waste Disposal Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check Once upon Planning The proposed project may result in impacts to ofbuilding completion Director solid waste disposal services and facilities. 1. To reduce the proposed project's impacts on waste permits disposal facilities,project designs shall develop a means of reducing the amount of waste generated both during construction and when the project is in use. The waste reduction program shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of building permits. Potential ways of reducing project waste loads include implementation of recycling programs, and use of low maintenance landscaping when possible (i.e., native vegetation instead of turf), 2. Rainbow Disposal shall be contacted during the design Prior to issuance Applicant Plan Check Once upon Planning stage of project components to ensure the most efficient of building completion Department and economical means for rubbish removal.The designts permits shall include rubbish enclosures, projected travel areas, and turnabouts where necessary. 20 APPENDIX C PARKSIDE ESTATES SUSTAINABILITX PROGRAM PARKSIDE ESTATES ADDEND UM EIR Parkside Estates Sustainability Program Item Provided Per Plan Buyer's Comment by Shea Type O tion Site Install "first flush" sediment control Protects storm drainage system (CDS and NTS)to clean channels and streambeds site and adjoining condos Use native/drought-tolerant plant Reduces water consumption species in common-area landscaping Install "smart"advanced capability Reduces water consumption irrigation controllers (Weather- Trac) in common areas Construction Recycle job site construction and Reduces material sent to demolition waste landfill Implement construction site Protects storm drainage stormwater practices channels and streambeds Reduce vehicle track-out of soil Protects against run-off and from site provides dust control Rinse basins for cleaning of Protects against concrete concrete trucks discharge Incorporate fly ash or slag cement By-product from coal- burning in concrete foundations power plants reduces Portland Cement content and material going to landfill Slab designed to minimize offsite Reduces trucking from site trucking of excess soil Framing a _ . Use engineered lumber for beams Renewable resource Use engineered floor joist Renewable resource Use engineered roof truss Renewable resource Use engineered Oriented Strand Renewable resource sheathing for floors and roofs Use roofing material with 40-year Reduces replacement which or greater lifespan reduces need for new materials and waste Use fiber cement siding Reduction in overall wood usage, reduces replacement which cuts need for new material; less paint maintenance reduces paint emissions Plumbing �a _s A.. Install low-flow showerheads Reduces water consumption Install water-efficient sink faucets Reduces water consumption Install water-efficient toilets Reduces water consumption Parkside Estates Sustainability Pro rare Item Provided Per Plan Buyer's Comment by Shea Type Option Install recirculation hot water Reduces water consumption systems Alternative water piping system Reduces the mining and from copper(Cross-linked refining of copper; eliminates polyethylene PEX pipe) the possibility of copper pipe corrosion and slow water leaks Appliances/ Fixtures <d :w Install Energy Star dishwasher Reduces energy consumption Install Energy Star refrigerators Reduces energy consumption whereprovided) Install Energy Star washing Reduces energy consumption machine whereprovided) Install pin type compact Reduces energy consumption fluorescent lamps for hardwired fixtures kitchens Install photo or motion sensors on Reduces energy consumption exterior lighting fixtures Install kitchen recycle bins Provides better consumer usa e HVAC ` Engineered HVAC system Increased efficiency of system Test duct work for leakage Increased efficiency of system Install high-efficiency HVAC Reduces energy consumption equipment with SEER rating of 13 Note: higher ratings could be or higher offered as options Bath fan with humidity sensor, Provides for better air quality motion sensor or timer Install TXV valve on air Reduces energy consumption conditioning system Windows .. Install vinyl frame windows with Increased energy efficiency. dual pane low emissivity lass Indoor Air .., `. Al. Use low-volatile organic Reduces emissions into the compound VOC interior paints atmosphere Use water-based wood finishes Reduces emissions into the atmosphere Use low-VOC construction Reduces emissions into the adhesives atmosphere Low-or formaldehyde-free Provides for better indoor air insulation quality Natural gas clean-burning Reduces emissions into the fireplace atmosphere Potential Option Programs Photovoltaic solar systems Reduces energy consumption Parkside Estates Sustainability Program Item Provided Per Plan Buyer's Comment by Shea Type Option Solar water heating system Reduces energy consumption Air purification systems Provides for better air quality Radiant heat roof sheathing Reduces heat in attics Increased insulation More efficient Whole-house fans Alternative house cooling Increases in SEER levels of Reduces energy consumption HVAC equipment Carbon monoxide alarms Provides alert of indoor quality a. issues Consumer Education Materials Storm Water Pollution Prevention Consumer education guidelines for homeowners Landscape planning guides for Consumer education proper irrigation and run off control ATTACHMENT # 16 REVISE® TRACT MAP NOS. 153 7(R) AN 1541 (R) AND ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT Na 03® 3 Applicant: Shea Homes Location: 17301 Graham Street (Westside of Graham, south of Kenilworth, adjacent to the Wintersburg Flood Control Channel) June 1, 2009 1 REQUEST REVISED TRACT MAPS — Modify Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377 and 15419; — Reduce numbered lots from 170 to 111 lots; and — Increase lettered lots for open space and conservation purposes. ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT — Amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90: Reduce the number of single family dwelling units from 170 to 111 units; and Improve a 1 .57 acre public park 2 REQUEST (CONTINUED) Amendment to Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18: IF Modify approved plans for the Parkside Residential Development and associated infrastructure. Approval "in-concept." 3 2002 Approved Plan a. 21111A SON- t RE j� "MIT 4'Z r s. SO IST a J R IX, If i � � � ,ate \`\� ��� �� �� � �� ':� ✓�2 � , ' �� � - ate' •'. "a,, 4 Proposed Plan Fam I-z � m F3 f t X v $ Y e ---------- 5 ANALYSIS Revised project will remain compatible with surrounding single family residences to the north, east, and south. — Comparable density (4.4 units per acre) — Compatible in both height and architectural massing to the adjacent single family; — 133 ft. separation between the existing homes and proposed homes; and — Revised pad heights and street grades of the revised plans are comparable to the previously approved plans. 6 ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) ., Revised project layout and design are comparable to previously approved plans: — One access point at Graham Street; — Emergency access only at Greenleaf Lane; — Non-gated public streets; and — 1 .8 acre paseo park to provide buffer. Revised project increases open space conservation area from 3.7 acres to 23.1 acres: — Create, restore, preserve wetland and buffer areas; — Create trails and public viewing area; and — Construct Natural Water Treatment System. 7 ANALYSIS (CONTINUE®) 1 .57 acre park land dedication meets and exceeds minimum requirements: — 0.57 acre passive park (native vegetation, paths, and benches) — 1 .0 acre active park (open field, play area) K Park improvements will be augmented by additional 0.7 acres of common area. Additional amenities available for public use including trails and viewing platform. 8 AL I (CONTINUED) Project will help meet the City's housing goals. — 12 affordable units (10% of the total 111 proposed units) for families of low-income level (less than 80% of Orange County median). Project is covered by EIR No. 97-2, California Coastal Commission action, and Addendum EIR to EIR No. 97-2. 9 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Revised Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377(R) and 15419 (R) and Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-008: — Substantial compliance with the previously approved plans; — Consistent with the General Plan; — Consistent with the Local Coastal Program/Coastal Element; — Public improvements to be constructed as a result of this project; 10 EC ENDATION (CONT. ) — 46% of the project area (23.1 acres) will be used for coastal conservation; — 15% of the project area (4 acres) will be used for public use open space; — Helps meet housing goals; — Well-designed in terms of street layout and architecture; and — Compatible with adjacent low density residential uses in terms of density and building layout, and open space uses. 11 End RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Planning SUBJECT: Revised Tentative Tract Map Nos:-1.5.3Z..7-(R)"and 15419 (R)/ Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 (Amendments to Conditional Use Permit No..96-90 and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18) - Parkside Residential COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 1, 2009 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached ❑ Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached ❑ Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Attached Not Applicable ❑ Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) Attached ❑ (Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. Attached ❑ (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Attached ❑ Not Applicable Fiscal Impact Statement (Unbudgeted, over $5,000) Attached ❑ Not Applicable �~ Bonds (If applicable) Attached ❑ Not Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Attached t Applicable ❑ Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Attached ❑ Not Ap licable Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached Not Applicable ❑ EXPLANATION 117,014 ,SS1NG ATTACHMENTS REVI YVEDW" �1°°y °� °z RE NED FORWARDED Administrative Staff Deputy City Administrator (Initial) •t 3` /i.t•J City Administrator Initial City Clerk EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM: • Sur� rnary of Project Support Letters To the H u nti ng ton Beach City Council June 1 , 2009 RECEIVED FRS -.��- IDS PUBLIC RErw, VR40UNCIL MEETING OF- CITY Ct Rit OF ICE - JOAN L FLYNN,CITY CLERK LAER 'PEARC E & Associates Con.+ultunt. ut Strutrgic Contnnurtcutiun� June 1, 2009 Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach Hand Delivered RE: Support for Agenda Items 1 and 2 Dear Mayor Bohr and Members of the Council: Over the last two weeks, Shea Homes has communicated with our project's supporters in the community asking them to send letters in support of approval of the matter before you this evening. Our supporters have responded strongly. I am pleased to report that in total, 105 citizens of Huntington Beach have sent letters to you, asking for affirmative action tonight on Parkside Estates. The letter reads in part: The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. As you know from experience, supporters of a project are less likely to turn out for a public hearing than opponents, so I ask that as you consider this matter tonight, you remember that these 105 city residents are here in spirit, asking for your yes vote. Best regards, oPeAssociates President cc: Ms. Mary Beth Broeren Mr. Ron Metzler 22892 Mill Creck Ur., Laguna Hills, CA 92653 ► 949.599.1212 ► Fax. 949.599.1213 No.. www.laer.com From: lmerk@sterigenics.com Sent: Monday,June 01,2009 10:25 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Lonna M Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Imerk@ steri genic s.com 714 969-4189 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: tj_tours @ yahoo.corn Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 10:31 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Thomas Neff Huntington Beach, ca 92649 tj tours @ yahoo.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: dkoliboski@msn.com Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 10:35 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Danielle Koliboski Huntington Beach, CA 92646 dkoliboski@msn.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner L From: svlroselli@aol.com Sent: Monday, June 01,2009 10:59 AM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number-of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Stacey Roselli Huntington Beach, CA 92648 svlroselll@aol.com 714-375-3895 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: robertwbriggs@gmail.com Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 11:06 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Robert Briggs Fountain Valley, CA 92708 robertwbri g es @ grnaiLcom CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: kevintaugher@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 11:15 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. r Kevin Taugher Huntington Beach, CA 92649 kevintauf4her@yahoo.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: robinweissman @ hotmail.com Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:14 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Robin Weissman Huntington Beach, ca 92648 robinweissman @hotmail.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: ptanghal@gmail.com Sent: Monday, June 01,2009 2:02 PM To: rtalleh@suricity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. PHILIP TANGHAL Huntington Beach, ca 92647 ptanghal@gmail.com 714.656.7656 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner I From: kmortonmaga@gmail.com Sent: Monday,June 01, 2009 10:10 AM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Kathryn Maga Huntington Beach, ca 92648 kmortonmaga@gmall.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: nadia_miller@ verizon.net Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 10:11 AM To: rtalleh@surtcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Nadia Miller Huntington Beach, CA 92646 nadia miller@verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: E Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 9:57 AM To: L e Subject: FW: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps From: saberryhot@hotmail.com [mailto:saberryhot@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:21 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Scott Berry Huntington Beach, CA 92647 saberryhot@hotmail.com 202-657-2665 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: Mafthew—Watson@verizon.net Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 8:84 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Matthew Watson Hunitington Beach, CA 92648 Matthew Watson@verizon.net 714-943-0333 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner r From: hbmikeb@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 8:21 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Mike Betancourt Huntington Beach, ca 92647 hbmikeb@yahoo.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: ccorey@socal.rr.com Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 9:36 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. clark corey huntington beach, ca 92647 ccorey@ socal.rr.com 714-847-1350 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: Irey@socal.rr.com Sent: Sunday, May 31,2009 8:02 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. i Larry Reynolds Huntington Beach, ca 92647 Irey@socal.rr.com 714 -841-6832 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: grammakamp @ verizon.net Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 4:57 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. John Kamp Huntington Beach, CA 92647 grammakamp @ verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: cmarilu33@aol.com Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 11:46 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. ; Don and Mary Clemens huntington Beach, CA 92649 cmarilu33@aol.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott fIess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: t&j56@verizon.net Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:32 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Tim Storer Huntington Beach, CA 92647 t&j56@verizon.net 714/841-6193 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: tnowels@socal.rr.com Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 8:08 AM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Todd & Lisa Nowels HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-5665 tnowels@socal.rr.com 714-842-4021 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: swballoons @ verizon.net Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:28 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Cheri Hoffman Huntington Beach, CA 92647 swballoons @ verizon.net 7148426088 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: dharkink@msn.com Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 2:57 PM. To: rtalleh @surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at''no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. DIANE HARK-INK Huntington Beach, CA 92647 dharkink@msn.com 714-651-4171 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner i From: dlahmani@socal.rr.com Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 2:39 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. david LAHMANI HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 dlahmani@ socal.rr.com 714-841-9978 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami TalIeh, Senior Planner From: wesstoner@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 11:13 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Wes Stoner Huntington Beach, CA 92646 wesstoner@yaboo.com 714-968-8359 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: I.anaya@rightins.com Sent: Thursday, May 28,2009 9:47 PM To: rialleh@suricity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Larry Anaya Huntington Beach , CA 92647 l.anaya@rightins.com 714 841 3056 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: lakefan2l @verizon.net Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:46 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Sheila Anaya Huntington Beach , CA 92647 lakefan2l @verizon.net 714 841 3056 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner I From: rsaitman@socal.rr.com Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:43 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Robert Saitman Huntington Beach, Ca 92647 rsaltman@socal.rr.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner i From: sherigust@att.net Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:23 PM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Sheri Gust Huntington Beach , CA 92649 sherigust@att.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner i From: rob@drectpropertyservice.com Sent: Thursday, May 28,2009 2:22 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr. I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Rob Magnotta Huntington Beach, CA 92646 rob @drectpropertyservice.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: bb@socal.rr.com Sent: Tuesday, May 26,2009 7:39 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Bernard Bendow Huntington Beach, CA 92647 bb@sc,cal.rr.com 714 847 7006 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hless, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: gonetone@aql.com Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:23 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. John Gonet Huntington Beach, CA 92647 -onetone@aql.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: dbeichen@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:08 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Douglas Eichen Huntington Beach, CA 92647 dbeichen@aol.com 714 842-0206 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: mike.hathaway@verizon.net Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 8:47 PM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Mike Hathaway Huntington Beach, CA 92647 mike.hathaway@verizon.net 714 840-8729 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: kaz daniel@hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 10:43 AM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Daniel Kaz Huntington Beach, ca 92647 kaz daniel@hotmail.com 714-330-6119 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess,Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: jvogrin@socal.rr.com Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 7:16 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-Worg Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. ; Joseph Vogrin Jr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 jvogrin@socal.rr.com 714-846-6713 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rarrmi Talleh, Senior Planner From: memiller@cox.net Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 11:35 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and.the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. mary nuller corona, ca 92883 memiller@cox.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: ada.temores@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 10:36 AM To: rtalleh @ surf city-Worg Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. ada Temores Chino, CA 91710 ada.temores@yahoo.com 909-732-3215 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess,Director of Planning Rarni Talleh, Senior Planner I From: f.muzic@verizon.net Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 10:28 AM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-Worg Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Fred Muzic Huntington Beach, CA 92647 f.muzicC verizon.net 714-835-3740 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: l.muzic@verizon.net Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 10:26 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Lynne Muzic Huntington Beach,CA 92647 I.muzjc@ven'zon.net 714-835-3740 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: HBNONI@aol.com Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 10:17 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Robert Hoxsie Huntington Beach, CA 92647 HBNONI@aol.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: nmustafa@asg-assetsolutionsgroup.com Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 10:14 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Nasser Mustafa Huntington Beach, CA 92646 nmustafa@as2-assetsolutionsgroup.com 7145539595 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: christine.medina@sheahomes.com Sent: Thursday, May 21,2009 5:45 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Christine Medina Fullerton, CA 92832 chri stine.medina @ sheahomes.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: cohpor@ earthliink.net Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 4:04 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps DearA Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone. and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. DeniseA Porter Huntington Beach,A CAA 92647 cohpor@earthjllnk.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: michael.ayala@sheahomes.com Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 11:48 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. michael ayala chino hills, ca 91709 michael.ayala@sheahomes.com 951-264-0965 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: jshatney@ hearthside-homes.com Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:03 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Julie Shatney Garden Grove, CA 92845 jshatney@hearthside-homes.com 714-898-1662 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: cawendl@corecon.com Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 7:59 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Christine Wendl Huntington Beach, CA 92647 cawejidl@corecon.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: Saylorcat22 @ hotmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 5:50 PM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Frederick Marsh Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Saylorcat22 @ hotmail.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: artman47@verizon.net Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:16 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps DearA Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Joseph @ HarrietA Boyer Huntington Beach,A CAA 92647 artman47@verizoii.net 714-596-2358 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner i From: yogesh.r.parikh @ gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 7:03 AM To: rtalleh @surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. ; Yogesh Parikh Huntington Beach, CA 92647 yogesh.r.parikh @ g_mail.com 714-841-1394 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: louisehinkle@mac.com Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 6:01 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps DearA Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. RichardA Hinkle Huntington Beach,A CAA 92647 louisehinkle@mac.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: rfoat@verizon.net Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 3:03 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr. I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Bryan Foat Huntington Beach, CA 92647 rfoat@verizon.net 714 840-6541 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy,Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: rfoat @ verizon.net Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 3:00 PM To: rtalleh @surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Richard Foat Huntington Beach, CA 92647 rfoat@verizon.net 714 840-6541 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: rfoat @verizon.net Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 3:02 PM To: rta►leh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Joanne Foat Huntington Beach, CA 92647 rfoat@verizon.net 714 840-6541 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: lundr79@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:32 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Robert Lund Huntington Beach, CA 92647 lundr79@yahoo.com 714-323-7593 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: stusouders@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:37 PM To: rtalleh @surf city-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Stuart Souders Huntington Beach, CA 92647 stusouders @ Vahoo.com 714 841 1565 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: Gobruin@aol.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:31 PM To: rtalleh @surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Ray & Linda Williams Huntiington Beach, CA 92647 Gobruln@aol.com 714 842-4038 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: drift cowboy@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 5:04 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Tom Teissere Huntington Beach, Ca 92647 drift_ cowboy@yahoo.com 714 330 2418 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Less, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: rob@albertgrover.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 1:30 PM To: rtalleh @surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Rob Kuehn Huntington Beach, CA 92647 rob @ albertgrover.com 714-847-9596 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: konol @socal.rr.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 12:55 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-Worg Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Kenneth Ono Huntington Beach, CA 92647 kono 1 @)socal.rr.com 714-841-1157 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess,Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: konol @socal.rr.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 12:52 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Shirley Ono Huntington Beach, CA 92647 kono I @ socal xr.com 714-841-1157 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: jud.duffy@verizon.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:57 AM To: rtalleh @surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. , William & Judith Duffy Huntington Beach, CA 92683 iud.duffy@ verizon.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: jud.duffy@verizon.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:56 AM To: rtalleh @surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. William Duffy Huntington Beach, CA 92683 iud.duff 7@verizon.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: kcallahan001 @socal.rr.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:11 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Kathleen Woodard Callahan Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5501 kcallahan001 @ socal.rr.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: kbellon@verizon.net Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 9:58 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Kathy Bellon Huntington Beach, CA 92647 kbellon@verizon.net 7148426388 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: pbeflon@verizon.net Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 9:57 PM To: rtalleh @surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Philip Bellon Huntington Beach, CA 92647 12beJlon@ven'zon.net 7148426388 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: georgechristides@hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 6:40 PM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes'Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. George Christides Huntington Beach, CA 92647 georgechristides @hotmall.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: nik.other2@verizon.net Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 12:09 AM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-Worg Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. nik von gundell huntington beach, ca 92647 nik.other2@verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: jwdf@msn.com Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 7:33 PM To: rtalleh @surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Jim Whitworth Huntington Beach , Ca 92647 jwdf@msn.com 714-975-0488 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: Asamarinl @verizon.net Sent: Saturday, May 16,2009 6:46 PM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-Worg Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Morris Samarin Garden Grove, Ca. 92845 AsamarinI @verizon.net 1-714-890-3591 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: gbuley@aol.com Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 3:47 PM To: rtalleh @surf city-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Joe & Geri Buley Huntington Beach, CA 92649 -bulev@baol.com 714-840-9764 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: mwind@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 10:18 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Melissa Overton Huntington Beach, CA 92647 mwind@yahoo.com 714-329-7151 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: lucyml@earthlink.net Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 9:35 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Dean and Lucy Mouren- Laurens Huntington Beach, CA 92647 lucyinl @earthlink.net 714 847 6622 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: dalyaaviv@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 5:55 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-Worg Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Dalya Aviv Huntigton Beach, CA 92647 dalyaaviv @byahoo.com 239-471-7668 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: barbara.hunt3 a verizon.net Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 8:51 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. i Barbara Hunt Huntington Beach, CA 92647 barbara.hunt3@verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: jlippold@socal.rr.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:38 PM To: rtalleh @ surfeity-Worg Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr. I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. John Lippold Huntington Beach, CA 92647 jlippold @ socal.rr.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: quevyngreen@msn.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 9:07 PM To: rtalleh @surf city-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools,but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Kevin Green Huntington Beach, CA 92647 quevyngreen@msn.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: hbprodLicer@aol.com Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 4:41 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Fi Richard A. Benvenuti Huntington Beach, Ca 92649 hbproducer@ aol.com 714 846-8667 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: rlafey@msn.com Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:42 AM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Robert Lafey Huntington beach, CA 92647 rlafey@msn.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: tcstoddard@verizon.net Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 9:26 AM To: rtalleh@sur[city-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. thomas Stoddard Huntington Beach, CA 92647 tcstoddard@verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: robinrbowen@verizon.net Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 9.32 AM To: rtalleh @surf city-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Robin Bowen Huntington Beach, CA 92647 robinrbowen@verizon.net (714) 842-1519 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: adamrodell@aol.com Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 10:51 AM To: rtalleh@sur[city-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Adam Rodell Huntington Beach, CA 92647 adamrodell@)aol.com 714-747-2117 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: dianehayes7@cbank.com Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 3:14 PM To: rtalleh @surf city-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Diane Hayes Huntington Beach, CA 92647 dianehayes7 @cbank.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: ragocarla@aol.com Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 7:01 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-Worg Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Carla Rago Huntington Beach, Ca 92647 ragocarla@aol.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: harterfoist@earthlink.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:27 PM To: rtalleh @surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. 3 Brian Foist Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5608 harterfoist @ earthlink.net 714-848-2016 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: Barbara @ Barba raSellsTheBeach.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 7:59 PM To: rtalleh @surf city-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Barbara Delgleize Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Barbara@BarbaraSellsTheBeach.com 714 421-0103 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: flyinlion@socal.rr.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 7:39 PM To: rtalleh @surf city-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Charles Leech Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5629 flyinlion@socal.rr.com (714) 848-6806 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: ae.cruz@verizon.net Sent: Thursday, May 14,2009 4:13 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Allan Cruz Huntington Beach, ca 92648 ae.cruz@verizon.net 714-225-2789 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: donna@cga.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:06 PM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Donna Witteborn Huntington Beach, Ca 92647 donna@cga.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: vkoble@verizon.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:05 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Vanessa Koble Huntington Beach, CA 92647 vkoble@verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: khight001 @socal.rr.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:45 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Karen Hight huntington beach, CA 92647 khight001 @socal.rr.com 714-345-7867 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: pastorfam @verizon.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:39 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Michael Gibson Huntington Beach, CA 92647 pastorfam@.verizon.net CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: kathygibson @ marykay.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:37 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Kathryne Gibson Huntington Beach, CA 92647 kathygibson@marykay.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: cbarsh@verizon.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:13 PM To: rtalleh @ surfcity-Worg Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Chris Barsh huntington beach, CA 92647 cbarsh@verizon.net 714-841-3953 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: mary.healey@verzion.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:00 PM To: rtalIeh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. john healey huntington beach, ca 92647 mary.healey@verzion.net 714 840 1284 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: rwroth6@aol.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:47 PM To: rtalleh @surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fiend these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning,please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Ronald Roth Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5651 rwroth6@aol.com 1-714-847-1594 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess,Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: AimeeHale79@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:39 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. Aimee Hale Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679 AimeeHale79@yahoo.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: whojr@verizon.net Sent: Thursday, May 14,2009 2:37 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take . thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. William Oram Huntington Beach, Ca 92647 whojr@verizon.net 714-848-8554 CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Ran-Li Talleh, Senior Planner i From: dave @toolalliance.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:27 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps DearA Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. DavidA Povich Huntington Beach,A CAA 92649 dave@)toolalliance.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess,Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: nigabg@aol.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:25 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. { arthur goldberg huntington beach, ca 92647 nlgabg_@aol.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner From: conflakes@socal.rr.com [mailto:conflakes@socal.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 7:22 PM To: rtalleh@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Approve Parkside Estates Revised Maps Dear Mayor Bohr, I'm writing in support of Shea Homes' Parkside Estates. The project's new plan reduces the number of homes, and therefore its impacts on traffic and schools, but keeps all the benefits. Parkside's new flood protection enhancements will lead to a new flood map that will take thousands of homes out of the mandatory flood insurance zone, and the plan protects and enhances wetlands. Plus, Shea Homes will fund these regional benefits, at no cost to the city or taxpayers. Because Parkside Estates represents smart, environmentally sensitive planning, please approve the revised tentative tract map and other documentation when they come before you. Thank you for considering my thoughts. connie orr huntington beach, ca. 92647 conflakes@socal.rr.com CC: Joe Carchio, Council Member Gil Coerper, Council Member Devin Dwyer, Council Member Cathy Green, Council Member Don Hansen, Council Member Jill Hardy, Council Member Scott Hess, Director of Planning Rami Talleh, Senior Planner i w SANDRA GENIS, PLANNING RESOURCES 1586 NIYRTLEWOOD COSTA MESA, CA. 92626 P11ONE/FAX (714) 754-0814 June 1, 2009 RECEIVED FROM ,fl. AS PUBLIC RECORD FOR Huntington Beach City Council OF---CITY CLERK®Fii E � City of Huntington Beach �hNI.FLYPIN.CITY CLERK 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Revised Tentative Tract Map Nos. 15377 and 15419 and Entitlement Plan Amendment 08-08 (Public Hearings 1 and 2) Dear Mayor Bohr and Members of the City Council, I have reviewed Addendum Environmental Impact Report for Revised Tentative Tract Map Nos.]5377 and 15419 and Entitlement Plan Amendment 08-08 (amendments to Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18) and have a number of concerns. I am writing as an individual and as a board member of the Bolsa Chica Land Trust. My first concern relates to the use of an addendum versus a subsequent EIR. As noted in the staff report, no additional environmental documentation is required unless: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR ... due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR ... due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete ... shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR ...; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant All effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Pub. Res. Code §21166. That is the case for this project. An addendum may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 (above) calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. (C.C.R. §15164(b)). In this case, even the material provided in the AEIR addresses more than minor technical changes, including the discussion of greenhouse gases. In addition, numerous significant changes have occurred in the proposed project and in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken and new information of substantial importance has come to light, as detailed in the May 26, 2009 letter submitted by the Bolsa Chica Land Trust. Even if one agreed that the City's utilization of an addendum instead of a subsequent EIR was correct, the document still fails. The AEIR prepared by the City fails to address all potential changes in the proposed project and changes in circumstances, resulting in failure to fully identify and mitigate impacts on aesthetics, transportation, air quality, water quality, noise, biological resources, and public services, as discussed below. Aesthetics The AEIR fails to address changes in the project which would result in increased pad height in certain areas of the site. This would result in increased visual impacts on neighboring properties creating a situation similar to that experienced by homeowners along Los Patos, who have been adversely affected by fill on the Brightwater site. This is a significant adverse impact for which no mitigation is provided. The AEIR fails to address the proposed "entry arbor", shown on Site Detail *, included in Page 2-65 of the staff report. This is similar to the entry monument at the Brightwater project, where the structures became a source of controversy. Such monuments are visually jarring, and create an impression of exclusion, thereby discouraging public use of public parks, trails and other open space. This is a significant adverse impact for which no mitigation is provided. Transportation/circulation The AEIR asserts that reduction in the amount of fill will result in a reduction in construction trips"particularly haul trips for fill". However, as originally proposed, fill would have been obtained from the nearby Brightwater site. Fill will no longer be available from that source, and no other similarly proximate sites are known to exist. The AEIR fails to identify or even address the location of borrow sites. Given the lack of known sources of fill in the nearby area, it is likely that it will be necessary to obtain fill from remote sites, resulting in previously unanticipated materials hauling on Warner and other roadways. The AEIR fails to address haul routes or impacts thereof. This is a potentially significant adverse impact for which no mitigation is provided. The City must not postpone examination of any such impacts to a future time, inasmuch as that would constitute piecemeal analysis, contrary to the requirements of CEQA (C.C.R §15003 (h)). The AEIR addresses the trip reduction which would occur due to a reduction in proposed dwelling units, but does not address changes in existing circulation which may cause any increase in traffic to be of greater significance. City data for 2006 indicate that several locations have experience a significant increase in daily traffic (ADT) since EIR 97-2 was certified. LOCATION ADT EIR 97-2 2006 Warner(Graham to Springdale) 30,000 31,000 Warner(Springdale to Edwards) 25,000 33,000 Graham at Kenilworth 7,200 8,000 The changes range from an increase of a few percent to over thirty percent, certainly enough to result in a change in traffic level of service (LOS). The AEIR fails to address the intersection of Warner and Pacific Coast Highway, although EIR No. 97-2 indicates that 8 percent of project traffic will proceed toward that intersection. The Pacific City EIR (EIR No. 02-01, (State Clearinghouse # 2003011024)) indicates that the intersection operated at LOS D during the morning peak hour and LOS E during the evening peak hour, with intersection capacity utilization (ICU) figures of.886 and .928, respectively. EIR No. 02-01 forecast a morning LOS of E and evening LOS F, i.e. failure, by 2008. The same EIR provided forecasts based on Caltrans methodologies under which the intersection would be at LOS F during both the morning and evening peak hour by 2008. The recently released Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Goodell Annexation (SCH # 2009031094) states (p.17): The results of the study [Orange County SEIR NO. 5 5 1] indicated that...the existing LOS at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Warner Avenue was considered unacceptable and the development of the Brightwater residential project would further impact the intersection. Physical constraints of the intersection and Coastal Act requirements pertaining to the presence of coastal wetlands along Warner Avenue prevented the implementation of any feasible mitigation measures." Thus, any increase in traffic at Pacific Coast Highway and Warner Avenue would create an unavoidable, unmitigable, adverse impact. The AIER fails to address this impact. It is noted that transportation planning at the time EIR No. 97-2 was prepared included widening Warner Avenue in that area, a project precluded by Bolsa Chica Late! bust v. Si perior Court (1999) 71 Cal, App. 4th 493. Although it may be tempting to dismiss project impacts to this intersection as quite small in relation to total traffic at the intersection, that would be contrary to the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. The issue is well summed up in Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford(1990) 221 Cal.App.3 d 692: The EIR's analysis uses the magnitude of the current ozone problem in the air basin in order to trivialize the project's impact. In simple terms, the EIR reasons the air is already bad, so even though emissions from the project will make it worse, the impact is insignificant. The point is not that, in terms of ozone levels, the proposed Hanford project will result in the ultimate collapse of the environment into which it is to be placed. The significance of an activity depends upon the setting. (Guidelines, § 15064, subd. (b)) The relevant question to be addressed in the EIR is not the relative amount of precursors emitted by the project when compared with preexisting emissions, but whether any additional amount of precursor emissions should be considered significant in light of the serious nature of the ozone problems in this air basin... Appellants... contend in assessing significance the EIR focuses upon the ratio between the project's impacts and the overall problem, contrary to the intent of CEQA.[emphasis added] The court continued: We agree with the foregoing assessment of a cumulative impacts analysis. We find the analysis used in the EIR and urged by GWF avoids analyzing the severity of the problem and allows the approval of projects which, when taken in isolation, appear insignificant ... Under GWF's "ratio" theory, the greater the overall problem, the less significance a project ... In Los Angeles Unified School Dist. v. City of Los Angeles(1997) 58 Cal.AppAth 1019 the court stated: ... the relevant issue to be addressed...is not the relative amount of traffic noise resulting from the project when compared to existing traffic noise, but whether any additional amount of traffic noise should be considered significant in light of the serious nature of the traffic noise problem already existing The City is cautioned against adopting GWF's repudiated strategy in this case. Instead, impacts on the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Warner must be assessed based on the severity of the problem that exists, i.e. intersection failure. Air Quality The AEIR provides no analysis of construction impacts; only operational impacts are addressed. The AEIR provides no analysis of greenhouse gases due to construction. In addition, the AEIR incorrectly asserts that reduction in the amount of fill required will result in less air pollution than anticipated in EIR No. 97-2, neglecting to consider the need to haul fill from remote borrow sites, as discussed above, resulting in significant air emissions not previously anticipated. The AEIR incorrectly asserts that greenhouse gas emission from the currently proposed 1 I 1-unit project would ratio down directly on a unit per unit basis from emission which would be created by the previously approved 170-unit project. However, currently proposed unit size is considerably larger, resulting in greater emissions per unit. Approximately half the unit in the previously approved project would have been 2,500 to 2,800 square feet while the other half would have been 2,800 to 3,300 square feet. By contrast, currently proposed units will range in size from 3,100 square feet to 3,700 square feet. These larger units would consume greater amounts of energy per unit, both for construction and operation. The AEIR fails to address SCAQMD's policy objective of capturing 90 percent of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from new development projects in the residential/commercial sectors. While the AEIR provides a list of mitigation measures and "project commitments", there is no indication as to how much the proposed measures would actually reduce greenhouse gases from the project. In addition, the use of"commitments" as a means of assuring reduced impacts is troubling. Any project "commitments" must be included in mitigation monitoring programs required pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 21081.6 in order to assure implementation. The AEIR fails to address the proposed project in light of the effects of greenhouse gases. As stated in Assembly Bill 32, also known as the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water [emphasis added] to the state from the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels [emphasis added] resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems. (California Health and Safety Code Section 38501(a)) Other recognized impacts related to greenhouse gases include increased flood peaking and increased stress on habitat areas. Noise The AEIR incorrectly asserts that reduction in the amount of fill required will result in less air pollution than anticipated in EIR No. 97-2, neglecting to consider the need to haul fill from remote borrow sites, as discussed above, resulting in significant haul route noise not previously anticipated. Water Quality While the AEIR addresses the proposed NTS as a means of treating runoff, the AEIR fails to address impacts on impaired water bodies pesticides pursuant to Section 303 (d) of the Clean Water Act, as listed by the California State Water Resources Control Board (WRCB). Any increase in pollutants to impaired water bodies is considered significant, These include: • Huntington Harbour- impaired for metals, pathogens and pesticides, refined in 2002 to indicate impairment due to copper, dieldrin, nickel, pathogens, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and further refined in 2006 to indicate impairment due to chlordane, copper, lead nickel, pathogens, PCBs and sediment toxicity. • Bolsa Chica State Beach — impaired due to copper and nickel. • Huntington Beach State Park —impaired due to unacceptable levels of enterococcus and indicator bacteria. • Bolsa Chica Channel and East Garden Grove/Wintersburg Channel — proposed for 303(d) listing due to concentrations of ammonia The AEIR must address the efficiency of the proposed system in removing pollutants, with particular attention to those noted above. Absent such analysis there is no evidence on the record that significant impacts will not occur. Biological Impacts The AEIR addresses light and glare for aesthetic purposes, but fails to address impacts due to light and glare on the wetlands and other resources which are to be preserved. Lighting can have significant impacts on wildlife the City is referred to Ecological Conseguetices of Artificial Night Lighting(Rich, C., Longcore, T. 2006. Washington, DC: Island Press) for more information on this topic. This is a significant impact for which no mitigation is provided. Public Services The AEIR asserts that impacts to public services, including water and sewer, will be reduced due to a reduction in the number of dwelling units proposed. However, the AEIR fails to address increases in demand per unit, due to the provision of larger dwelling units, as discussed above. In addition, the AEIR fails to address reduced availability to domestic water due to reduction in imported water in order to protect the Sacramento Delta, reduced rainfall due to climate change, and reduced availability of groundwater due to saltwater intrusion. Conclusion The AEIR for the proposed project fails to fulfill the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. Not only is an AEIR not the proper vehicle in this case, it fails to fully inform decision makers and the public generally about all impacts of the proposed project. Action on the proposed project must be postponed until a subsequent EIR is prepared and circulated for public review. Yours Truly, Sandra L. Genis L L r .. ...:.,v:.�: ............Jf'M:::...k.{........�,:t::k^•;.ii::Y..•:: :::} Ti$:yMO'�ii: .}.::•k.G� <:$;�::::;': :.. .: ..:. .:. .fi::.::...........::::r:io-}}:?o:>};»:o;::.>:}>:o;•i>r::::}::•::.:>}:.};::•::':;.:::.:::::;::::::::;:;::i:S::i,:s':i i i f:::�:::::}:::>:;:i:?;;i:;:,+.;t>i'i i•��:� YMYASYS'sY'i:d'aYM':•.••• %/Nb'1AYVf Y>•}1b ::. .. .. ., , :' '. .'1:�:.i.::::ii;:i;j:;c;.;•.:<t:i.:i:i:iJ`2...:; .':;.:,::.::::::..:: E;t'::.:i:�::,�;,�:.:,..� ;, . ...... . . . .............. . .......... ............. .............. I ... ............... ........... .. i y .:.:..::..::............................:.':. L Yi i'r't ............. OR . .. ..::: .::.:' •.::A..:....:::::..:.i:i'YiMIMitA•YN!!W,.2i:;.i:SYaS ' i................. 'DRAFTENVIRONMENTAL C C REPO RT Y ..... $ SCH No. 2003011024 City of Funfirq!vn 8eaC41 2000 M-n4i S'?rrmt, E3Q, B,-,x 190 Boo-:1,1y C 92648 11--4,S 36,6 2.7 El 3 01 W i16ti?;>e 9,�•:s1ev-}.rCJ,, wife 4 133 0 1 oS � :c�� e�, C 9 0 G 2 5 10.26FI.8 i 32 3.14 Transportation/Traffic A majority, of the study intersections were counted in August 2001 during the peak summer season. At this time, average daily traffic counts along the four project frontage roadways as well as Atlanta Avenue east of the project site and PCH northwest of 9th St.rect ,vere also taken. It should be noted that the summer weekday condition represents a "peak" period due to the beach resort character of the Downtown. Consequently, higher- levels of traffic are experienced in the vicinity of the proposed project during the summer than during a typical weekday. Common traffic engineering practice is to mitigate traffic and parking impacts to a typical weekday period, rather than a peak day (such as a holiday weekend, or summer period). As a result, the summer weekday condition is included in Appendix 1-1 to provide a comparison between typical and summer periods. Direct traffic and parking project impacts and mitigation measures have been developed based on typical weekday traffic counts. Existing Intersection Conditions To quantify the existing baseline traffic conditions, the 30 existing study area intersections were analyzed to determine their operating conditions during the morning and evening peak periods. Twenty six (26) of the study intersections are controlled by traffic signals. In conformance with City of Huntington Beach (City) criteria, the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICLI) Methodology ,vas employed to investigate the existing A.M. and P.M. peak hour operating conditions for these key intersections. The ICU technique is used for signalized intersections and estimates the volume to capacity (V/C) relationship for an intersection based on individual V/C ratios for- key conflicting movements. The ICLI numerical value represents the percent of the capacity required by existing or future traffic. The ICU value translates t.o a Level of Service (LOS) condition, which is a relative measure of the performance of the intersection. There are six Levels of Service that range from LOS A (free flow with an ICU of 0.60 or less) to LOS F (forced flow with an ICLI in excess of 1.00). LOS D (ICLI of 0.81 to 0.90) is traditionally considered the maximum acceptable LOS for urban and suburban peak hour conditions. The City of Fluntington Beach considers LOS D to be the maximum acceptable LOS for signalized intersections. LOS definitions are provided in Table 3.14-1. In conformance with the current: State of California Department of'fransportat.ion (Calirans) requirements, existing A.N,1. and P.Jt. peak hour operating conditions for the 19 Caltrans-operated signalized intersections within the project, study area (SR-39 [Beach Boulevard] and SR-1 [I'CI-I[) were evaluated using the 2000 1-lighway Capacity Manual (IICNI) signalized methodology. Based on the I ICNI method of analysis, LOS for signalized intersections is defined in terms of' control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost. travel time. Pacific City EIR 3.14-15 Chapter Environmental Impact Analysis Table 3.14-1 Level of Service Definitions for Signalized Intersections (ICU Method) Level of Service Intersection Capacity (LOS) Utilization Value(V/C) Level of Service Description A 0.00 to 0.60 Free flow;Very low delay,less than 10.0 seconds per vehicle. B 0.61 to 0.70 Rural Design;Delay in the range of 10.1 to 20 seconds per vehicle. C 0.71 to 0.80 Urban Design;Delay in the range of 20.1 to 35 seconds per vehicle. D 0.81 to 0.90 Maximum Urban Design;Delay ranges from 35.1 to 55 seconds per vehicle. E 0.91 to 1.00 Capacity,Delay ranges from 55.1 to 80 seconds per vehicle. F >1.01 Forced Flow;Delay in excess of 80 seconds per vehicles SOURCE: Linscott Law&Greenspan Engineers, Traffic Impact Analysis Report,April 2003a The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of'factors that relate to control, geometries, traffic, and incidents. Whereas total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during ideal conditions (in the absence of traffic control, geometric delay, roadway incidents, and other vehicles on the road), control delay represents the portion of the total delay that is attributed to the control facility. As such, control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Under the HCNI methodology, LOS criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle, which is measured in seconds/vehicle. The six qualitative categories of LOS that have been defined along with the corresponding HCM control delay value range for signalized intersections are shown in Table 3.14-2. In addition, out of the 32 study intersections for the proposed project., four intersections (First Street/Atlanta Avenue; Huntington Street/Atlanta Avenue; Delaware Street/Atlanta Avenue; and Huntington Street/Pacific View Avenue) are currently unsignalized. In conformance with the City of Huntington Beach requirements, the existing A.M. and P.M. peak hour operating conditions for these four unsignalized intersections were also evaluated using the HCM methodology, which estimates the average total delay for each of the subject movements and determines the LOS for each movement. Cable 3.14-3 defines the six qualitative categories of LOS for unsignalized intersections under the HCNI method of analysis. Based on City criteria for unsignalized intersections, LOS D is the minimum acceptable intersection LOS. Table 3.14-4 summarizes the existing service level calculations for the thirty existing study intersections (two of the 32 total study intersections are future intersections with no existing traffic) based on existing traffic volumes and current,street geometry. AS shown, all thirty study intersections currently operate at LOS D or better, except the intersection of PC A at Warner Avenue, which currently operates at.LOS E during the P.M. peak hour. 3.14-16 City of Huntington Beach 3.14 Transportation/Traffic Table 3.14-2 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections (HCM Method) Level of Service Control Delay Per Vehicle (LOS) (secondsNehicle) Level of Service Description A <10.0 This level of service occurs when progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B >10.0 and<20.0 This level generally occurs with good progression,short cycle lengths,or both. More vehicles stop than with LOS A,causing higher levels of average delay. C >20.0 and<35.0 Average traffic delays. These higher delays may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D >35.0 and<55.0 Long traffic delays.At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high v/c rations. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E >55.0 and<80.0 Very long traffic delays.This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios.Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F >80.0 Severe congestion.This level,considered to be unacceptable to most drivers,often occurs with over saturation,that is,when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures.Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing factors to such delay levels. SOURCE: Highway Capacity Manual,2000,Chapter 16(Signalized Intersections) Table 3.14-3 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections (HCM Method) Highway Capacity Manual Delay Level of Service(LOS) Value(secAteh) Level of Service Description A <10.0 Little or no delay B >10.0 and<15.0 Short traffic delays C >15.0 and<25.0 Average traffic delays D >25.0 and<35.0 Long traffic delays E >35.0 and<50.0 Very long traffic delays F >50.0 Severe congestion SOURCE: Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Table 3.14-4 Existing Year 2001/02 Peak Hour Levels of Service Key Intersection Time Period Control Type ICU/HCM LOS 1 Goldenwest Street at A.M. 6�Traffic Signal 0.623 B Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.721 C 17th Street at A.M. 0.580 A 2 Pacific Coast Highway P M. 3p Traffic Signal 0.637 B 3 9th Street at A.M. 3¢Traffic Signal 0.575 A Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0,589 A Pacific City EIR 3.14-17 Chapter 3 Environmental Impact Analysis Table 3.14-4 Existing Year 2001/02 Peak Hour Levels of Service Key Intersection Time Period Control Type ICU/HCM LOS 4 6th Street at A.M. 5�Traffic Signal 0.457 A Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.504 A 5 Main Street at A.M. 20 Traffic Signal 0.206 A 6th Street P.M. 0.321 A 6 Main Street at A.M. 5�Traffic Signal 0.611 B Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.697 B First Street at A.M. 9.2 stv A 7 Atlanta Avenue P.M. All-Way Stop 10.8 s!v B First Street at A.M. 0.452 A 8 Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 6�Traffic Signal 0.444 A Huntington Street at A.M. 10.7 stv B 9 Atlanta Avenue P.M. All-Way Stop 18.6 stv C Delaware Street at A.M. 3.2 s/v A 10 Atlanta Avenue P.M. Two Way Stop 5.4 stv A Huntington Street at A.M. 0.616 B 11 Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 5�Traffic Signal 0.571 A 12 Huntington Street at A.M. One-Way Stop 3.0 stv A Pacific View Avenue P.M. 2.5 s/v A Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0.580 A 13 Adams Avenue P.M. 8�Traffic Signal 0.665 B Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0.317 A 14 Indianapolis Avenue P.M. 5�Traffic Signal 0.426 A Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0.349 A 15 Atlanta Avenue P.M. 5�Traffic Signal 0.552 A Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0.518 A 16 Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 8�Traffic Signal 0.684 A Newland Street at A.M. 0.329 A 17 Atlanta Avenue P.M. 8�Traffic Signal 0.464 A 18 Newland Street at A.M. 60 Traffic Signal 0.567 A Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.596 A t9 Magnolia Street at A.M. 6�Traffic Signal 0.565 A Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.626 B 20 Magnolia Street at A•M• 8�Traffic Signal 0.371 A Atlanta Avenue P.M. 0.514 A 21 Pacific Coast Highway at A.M. 30 Traffic Signal 0.661 B Seapoint Avenue P.M. 0.803 C 22 Pacific Coast Highway at A.M. 80 Traffic Signal 0.886 D Warner Avenue P.M. 0.928 E 23 Pacific Coast Highway at A.M. 80 Traffic Signal 0.683 B Brookhurst Street P.M. 0.729 C 24 Main Street at AN 5�Traffic Signal 0.445 A Adams Avenue P.M. 0.618 B 25 Main Street at A.M. 8� Traffic Signal 0.210 A Utica Avenue P.M. 0 308 A 3.14-18 City of Huntington Beach 3.14 Transportation/Traffic Table 3.14-4 Existing Year 2001/02 Peak Hour Levels of Service Key Intersection Time Period Control Type /CU/HCM LOS 26 Lake Street at A M. 50 Traffic Signal 0.512 A Adams Avenue P.M. 0.588 A 27 Lake Street at A.M. 20 Traffic Signal 0.328 A Yorktown Avenue P.M. 0.451 A 28 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 80 Traffic Signal 0.632 B Yorktown Avenue P.M. 0.690 B 29 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 80 Traffic Signal 0.624 B Garfield Avenue P.M. 0.749 C 30 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 60 Traffic Signal 0.557 A Ellis Avenue/Main Street P.M. 0.669 B 31 First Street at A.M. N/A N/A N/A Pacific View Avenue(future) P.M. N/A N/A N/A 32 Beach Boulevard at A.M. N/A N/A N/A Pacific View Avenue(future) P.M. N/A N/A N/A s/v=seconds per vehicle(delay) Bold VIC and LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City LOS Standards SOURCE: Linscott,Law&Greenspan 2003a Existing Roadway Segments (Links) In conformance with the City's criteria, existing daily operating conditions for the 24 existing roadway links have been investigated according to the volume-to-capacity (V/C) of each link. The V/C relationship is used to estimate the LOS of the roadway segment with the volume based on 24-hour traffic count data and the capacity based in the City's classification of each roadway. Based on the City's General Plan, Orange County's MPAH, Caltrans Route Concept Report, and consultation with City staff, the roadway segment capacities of each street classification are shown in Table 3.14-5. The results of the analysis of existing service levels for the 24 existing study roadway segments, based on existing 24-hour traffic volumes and current roadway geometry, are summarized in "fable 3.14-6. As shown, only two of the study segments currently operate below the City's maximum V/C criteria of' 0.81. Based on the V/C method of analysis, the roadway segments of PCH between GoldenNvest Street/Sixth Street and Huntington Street /Beach Boulevard currently operate at LOS E on a daily basis. The remaining 22 roadway segments in the study area currently operate at LOS C or better. Pacific City EIR 3.14-19 Chapter 3 Environmental Impact Analysis Table 3.14-5 Roadway Segment Capacities LOS A Design LOS B Design LOS C Design LOS D Design LOS E Design Volume(Vehicles Volume(Vehicles Volume(Vehicles Volume(Vehicles Volume(Vehicles Street Classification Number of Lanes per day) per day ) per day) per day) per day) SmartstreeVPrincipal 8(divided) 45,300 52,500 60,000 67,400 75.100 Expressway 4(divided) 36,500 42,600 48,700 54,900 60,800 Expressway 6(divided) 54,600 63,700 72,800 82,000 91,000 Major Arterial 6(divided) 33,900 39,400 45,000 50,600 56,300 Primary Arterial 4(divided) 22,500 26,300 30,000 33,800 37.500 Secondary Arterial 4(undivided) 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 Arterial Collector 2(divided) 10,800 12,600 14,400 16,200 18,000 Collector 2(undivided) 7,500 8,800 10,000 11,300 12,500 SOURCE: Linscott Law&Greenspan Engineers,April 2003a Table 3.14-6 Year 2001 Existing Roadway Link Capacity Analysis Summary Existing Arterial LOS E Capacity Lanes Daily Volume VX Ratio LOS Pacific Coast Highway 60,800 4 42,000 0.691 B Warner Ave to Seapoint Ave Pacific Coast Highway 60,800 4 36,000 0.592 A Seapoint Ave to Goldenwest St Pacific Coast Highway 37,500 4 37,144 0.991 E Goldenwest Street to 6th Street Pacific Coast Highway 56,300 6 37,500 0.666 B 6th Street to First Street Pacific Coast Highway 56,300 6 37,545 0.667 B First Street to Huntington Street Pacific Coast Highway 37,500 4 37,000 0.987 E Huntington Street to Beach Blvd Pacific Coast Highway 56,300 6 40,000 0.710 C Beach Blvd to Newland Street Pacific Coast Highway 56,300 6 40,000 0.710 C Magnolia St to Brookhurst St Beach Boulevard 75,100 6 13,000 0.173 A PCH to Atlanta Ave Beach Boulevard 75,100 6 21,000 0.280 A Atlanta Ave to Indianapolis Ave Beach Boulevard 75,100 6 29,000 0.386 A Indianapolis Ave to Adams Ave Beach Boulevard 75,100 6 41,000 0.546 A Adams Ave to Yorktown Ave Beach Boulevard 75,100 6 45,000 0.599 A Garfield Ave to Main St 3.14-20 City of Huntington Beach 3.14 Transportation/Traffic Table 3.14-6 Year 2001 Existing Roadway Link Capacity Analysis Summary Existing Atlanta Avenue 32,000 4 16,000 0.500 A Beach Blvd to Delaware St Atlanta Avenue 12,500 2 9,267 0,741 C 1st St to Huntington St Atlanta Avenue 18,000 2 10.849 0.603 A Huntington St to Delaware St First Street 12,500 2 5,979 0.478 A Orange Ave to Pacific Coast Highway Huntington Street 18,000 2 1,887 0.105 A Atlanta Ave to Pacific View Ave Main Street 12,500 2 5,000 0.400 A Palm Ave to Adams Ave Lake Street 18,000 2 6,000 0.333 A Indianapolis Ave to Adams Ave Lake Street 18,000 2 9,000 0.500 C Adams Ave to Yorktown Ave Adams Avenue 37,500 4 25,000 0.667 B Beach Blvd to Newland St Indianapolis Avenue 25,000 4 7,000 0.280 A Beach Blvd to Newland St Atlanta Avenue 25,000 16,000 .640 B Beach Blvd to Newland St Pacific View(future with project) First Street to Huntington Street Bold VIC and LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City LOS Standards SOURCE: Linscott,Law 8 Greenspan 2003a Existing Parking The existing off-site parking plan for the adjacent roadways surrounding the project site is shown in Figure 3.14-5. There are currently 102 parking spaces (98 metered spaces and 100 feet of unrestricted parking, or approximately 4 spaces) on both sides of'First. Street, Atlanta Avenue, and PCH adjacent to the project site, 69 of which abut the project:site. Pacific City EIR 3.14-21 3.14 Transportation/Traffic Table 3.14-11 Related Projects Traffic Generation Forecast Daily A.M.Peak Hour P.M.Peak Hour Related Project Description 2-Way in Out Total In Out Total Trip Generation Forecast The Strand Retail/Restaurant/Office/Hotel(121,000 SF&149 Rooms) 7,106 220 163 383 324 293 617 Waterfront Ocean Grand Resort Low Density Residential(184 DU) 2,208 40 118 158 129 77 206 Resort Hotel(519 Rooms) 4,515 208 140 348 213 182 395 Subtotal 6,723 248 258 506 342 259 601 The Beachside Single-Family Residential(86 DU) 823 16 48 64 56 31 87 The Boardwalk(Area 413&PLC) Residential(500 DU) 5,230 61 289 350 315 161 476 Total Related Project Trip Generation 19,882 545 758 1,303 1,037 744 1,781 SOURCE: City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2003,LSA Associates 1998,1999,2002 Intersection Analysis—City Criteria Future Year 2008 Without Proposed Project Based on the traffic generation forecast for the Year 2008 background traffic conditions, the peak hour ICUMCM Level of Service results at the 32 study intersections were determined. The results are shown in Table 3.14-12, column (1). An analysis of near-term (Year 2008) traffic conditions in Table 3.14-12 indicates that the forecast increase in background traffic would continue to cause one of the 32 study intersections to operate at adverse service levels. The intersection of PCH at Warner Avenue, which currently operates at LOS E during the P.M. peak hour, is expected to operate at LOS F (P.M.) with the addition of background traffic in Year 2008. The remaining 31 key intersections are expected to continue to operate at LOS D or better in both peak hours. Future Year 2008 With Proposed Project ,�1s shown in Table 3.14-12, column (2), the intersection of PCH at Warner Avenue would experience an increase in ICU as a result of the proposed project traffic combined with background traffic (ambient plus cumulative projects), but the intersection would continue to operate at the same adverse service levels (LOS E or F) during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, The remaining 31 key study intersections have been forecasted to continue to operate at acceptable service levels with the addition of'the proposed project traffic during both the weekday A.M. and P.:�-t. peak commute hours. 'These projected A.M. and P.,%t. peak hour traffic volumes for the Year 2008 are illustrated in Figures 3. 14-9 and 3.14-10, respectively. Pacific City EIR 3.14-39 Chapter Environmental Impact Analysis Table 3.14-12 Year 2008 Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service Summary (1) (2) (3) (4) Year 2008 Background Year 2008 Background Project Impact/ Year 2008 With Time Conditions Plus Project Significance Mitigation Key intersections Period ICU LOS ICU LOS ICUInc. YIN ICU LOS 1 Goldenwest Street at A.M. 0.696 B 0.713 C 0.017 N - - Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.813 D 0.837 D 0.024 N - - 2 17th Street at A.M. 0.647 B 0.666 B 0.019 N - - Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.725 C 0.755 C 0.030 N - - 3 9th Street at A.M. 0.647 B 0.667 B 0.02 N - - Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.667 B 0.697 B 0.03 N - - 4 6th Street at A.M. 0.540 A 0.553 A 0.013 N - - Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.674 B 0.694 B 0.020 N - - 5. Main Street at A.M. 0.257 A 0.269 A 0.012 N - - 6th Street P.M. 0.384 A 0.410 A 0.026 N - - 6 Main Street at A.M. 0.669 B 0.681 B 0.012 N - - Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.770 C 0.790 C 0.020 N - - 7 First Street at A.M. 0.284 A 0.300 A 0.016 N - - Atlanta Avenue P.M. 0.315 A 0.367 A 0.052 N - - 8 First Street at A.M. 0.502 A 0.501 A -0.001 N - - Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.535 A 0.589 A 0.054 N - - 9 Huntington Street at' A.M. 11.72 B 0.355 A N/A N - - Atlanta Avenue P.M. 28.00 D 0.516 A N/A N - - 10 Delaware Street at' A.M. 3.34 A 3.44 A 0.100 N - - Atlanta Avenue P.M. 6.48 A 10.44 B 3.960 N - - 11 Huntington Street at A.M. 0.701 B 0.717 C 0.016 N - - Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.691 B 0.740 C 0.049 N - - 12 Huntington Street at' A.M. 4.76 A 8.89 A 4.130 N - - Pacific View Avenue P.M. 4.62 A 13.38 B 8.760 N - - 13 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0.651 B 0.678 B 0.027 N - - Adams Avenue P.M. 0.736 C 0.765 C 0.029 N - - 14 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0.358 A 0.380 A 0.022 N - - Indianapolis Avenue P.M. 0.479 A 0.515 A 0.036 N - - 15 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0.412 A 0.436 A 0.024 N - - Atlanta Avenue P.M. 0.622 B 0.681 B 0.059 N - - 16 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0.576 A 0.595 A 0.019 N - - Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.794 C 0.839 D 0.045 N - - 17 Newland Street at A.M. 0.360 A 0.362 A 0.002 N - - Atlanta Avenue P.M 0.515 A 0.526 A 0.011 N - - 18. Newland Street at A.M. 0.619 B 0.637 B 0.018 N - - Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.673 B 0.707 C 0.034 N - - 19 Magnolia Street at A.M. 0.617 B 0.635 B 0.018 N - - Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 0.694 B 0.721 C 0.027 N - - 20 Magnolia Street at A.M. 0.399 A 0.402 A 0.003 N - - Atlanta Avenue P.M. 0.563 A 0.571 A 0.008 N - - 21 Pacific Coast Highway at A.M. 0.730 C 0.745 C 0.015 N - - SeapointAvenue P.M. 0.875 D 0.898 D 0.023 N - - 22 Pacific Coast Highway at A.M. 0.966 E 0.981 E 0.015 Y 0 793 C Warner Avenue P ra. 1.021 F 1.043 F 0.022 Y 0 842 D 3.14-40 City of Huntington Beach 3.14 Transportation/Traffic Table 3.14-12 Year 2008 Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service Summary (1) (2) (3) (4) Year 2008 Background Year 2008 Background Projectlmpact/ Year 2008With Time Conditions Plus Project Significance Mitigation Key Intersections Period ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU Inc. YIN ICU LOS 23 Pacific Coast Highway at A.M. 0.743 C 0.757 C 0.014 N - - Brookhurst Street P.M. 0.809 D 0.845 D 0.036 N - - 24 Main Street at A.M. 0.500 A 0.509 A 0.009 N - - Adams Avenue P.M. 0.703 B 0.729 C 0.026 N - - 25 Main Street at A.M. 0.227 A 0.231 A 0.004 N - - Utica Avenue P.M. 0.336 A 0.346 A 0.010 N - - 26 Lake Street at A.M. 0.553 A 0.556 A 0.003 N - - Adams Avenue P.M. 0.644 B 0.656 B 0.012 N - - 27 Lake Street at A.M. 0.366 A 0.373 A 0.007 N - - Yorktown Avenue P.M. 0.494 A 0.509 A 0.015 N - - 28 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0,705 C 0.721 C 0.016 N - - Yorktown Avenue P.M. 0.773 C 0.800 C 0.027 N - - 29 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0.685 B 0.707 C 0.022 N - - Garfield Avenue P.M. 0.830 D 0.858 D 0.028 N - - 30. Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0.610 B 0.621 B 0.011 N - - Ellis Avenue/Main Street P.M. 0.736 C 0.752 C 0.016 N - - First Street at A.M. N/A N/A 2.62 A N/A N - - 31. Pacific View'Avenue P.M. N/A N/A 4.34 A N/A N - - (future) 32 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 0.215 A 0.250 A 0.035 N - - Pacific View Ave(future) P.M. 0.252 A 0.284 A 0,032 N - - 1 LOS indicated as intersection delay in seconds/vehicle(s/v) Bold VIC and LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on Cdy LOS Standards SOURCE: Linscott,Law 8 Greenspan 2003a In addition, the projected ADT volumes, which represent the Year 2008 conditions with the proposed project, are illustrated in Figure 3.14-1 1. Intersection Analysis-State of California (Ca/trans) Methodology As required by the State of California Department. of Transportation (Caltrans), the 19 state route intersections within the project study area [SR-39 (Beach Boulevard) and SR-1 (p(7t-I)] were analyzed on an A.M. and P.,vi, peak hour basis, for existing and Year 2008 traffic conditions, consistent. with the recently published Caltrans Guider the Preparation cf IrafTc Impact Studies, [June, 20011. The peak hour FICNI (I-ICS-2000 for signalized intersections) Level of Service results at the 19 Slate- controlled study intersections within the study area are shown in 'fable 3.14-13. Pacific City EIR 3.14-41 Chapter 3 Environmental Impact Analysis Table 3.14-13 Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service Summary--Caltrans (HCM) (2) (3) (4) (1) Year 2008 Year 2008 Project (5) Year 2001 Existing Background Background Plus Impact/ Year 2008 With Time Conditions Conditions Project Significance Mitigation Key Intersections Period HCM LOS HCM LOS HCM LOS Yes/No HCM LOS 1 Goldenwest Street at A.M. 38.0 D 51.5 D 54.9 D No Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 35.0 C 45.9 D 51.4 D No 2 17th Street at A.M. 19.5 B 21.9 C 22.7 C No Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 18.7 B 24.0 C 30.2 C No 3 9th Street at A.M. 18.5 B 21.6 C 22.8 C No Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 15.6 B 22.0 C 32.1 C No 4 6th Street at A.M. 21.5 C 23.5 C 23.8 C No Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 18.3 B 21.6 C 21.9 C No 5 Main Street at A.M. 21.3 C 22.1 C 22.6 C No Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 22.0 C 23.8 C 24.5 C No 6 First Street at A.M. 33.5 C 40.1 D 47.8 D No Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 35.4 D 43.6 D 51.1 D No 7 Huntington Street at A.M. 21.4 C 28.9 C 47.7 D No Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 18.8 B 23.1 C 41.4 D No 8 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 39.1 D 40.9 D 41.4 D No Adams Avenue P.M. 41.5 D 45.4 D 48.5 D No 9 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 26.4 C 26.8 C 27.1 C No Indianapolis Avenue , P.M. 27.1 C 27.9 C 28.6 C No 10. Beach Boulevard at A.M. 29.3 C 29.6 C 29.6 C No Atlanta Avenue P.M. 32.5 C 33.4 C 34.7 C No 11 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 35.0 C 39.7 D 42.3 D No Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 25.5 C 33.7 C 46.1 D No 12 Newland Street at A.M. 23.7 C 26.3 C 27.7 C No Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 23.1 C 25.9 C 28.1 C No 13. Magnolia Street at A.M. 23.9 C 27.0 C 29.1 C No Pacific Coast Highway P.M. 25.2 C 29.0 C 32.5 C No 14 Pacific Coast Highway at A.M. 24.9 C 29.3 C 31.5 C No 29.0 C Seapo in t Avenue P.M. 34.6 C 62.8 E 79.4 E Yes 51.5 D 15 Pacific Coast Highway at A.M. 60.7 E 105.2 F 117.3 F Yes 44.9 D Warner Avenue P.M. 204.9 F 293.0 F 319.8 F Yes 42.6 D 16. Pacific Coast Highway at A.M. 32.9 C 37.9 D 40.6 D No _ _ Brookhurst Street P.M. 26.5 C 33.6 C 45.4 D No 17 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 39.8 D 44.0 D 45.9 D No _ Yorktown Avenue P.M. 39.0- D 46.1 D 52.2 D No 18 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 38.8 D 41.4 D 43.1 D No Garfield Avenue P.M. 42.4 D 49.4 D 54.6 D No 19 Beach Boulevard at A.M. 36.6 D 385 D 39.4 D No Ellis Ave/Main Street P.M. 42.5 D 49.0 D 54.0 D No Bold VIC and LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City LOS Standards SOURCE: LUnscott,Law 8 Greenspan 2003a 3.14-42 City of Huntington Beach 3.14 Transportation/Traffic Future Year 2008 Without Proposed Project As shown in Table 3.14-13, the forecast increase in background traffic is expected to result in or continue to operate at adverse service levels at two of the 19 State-controlled study intersections. The intersection of PCH at Warner ,Avenue, which currently operates at LOS E during the A.M. peak hour and LOS F during the P.iLm. peak hour, is expected to operate at LOS F during both A.m. and P..m. peak hours in Year 2008, with the addition of background traffic. The intersection of PCH at Seapoint Avenue, which currently operates at LOS C during both A.M. and P.M. peak hours, is expected to operate at LOS E during the peak hour in Year 2008, with the addition of background traffic. The remaining 17 State study intersections are expected to continue to operate at LOS D or better in both peak hours. Future Year 2008 With Proposed Project When the proposed project-related traffic is combined with the background traffic (ambient plus cumulative projects), the same two key study intersections (PCH at Warner and Seapoint Avenues) would experience an increase in I-ICM, but are expected to continue to operate at the same adverse service levels. The intersection of PCH at Warner Avenue would still operate at LOS F during both A.M. and P.M. peak hours, while the intersection of PCH at Seapoint Avenue would operate at LOS E during the P.M. peak hour. The remaining 17 intersections are expected to either operate at LOS D or better during the A.m. and P.M. peak hours, with the addition of project:traffic. Roadway Segment Analysis The daily roadway segment Level of Service at the 25 study roadway segments are summarized in Table 3.14-14. Table 3.14-14 Year 2008 Roadway Link Capacity Analysis Summary (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Year 2008Background Year 2008 with Project LOS E Daily V/C V/C V/1C Arterial Capacity Lanes Volume Ratio LOS Daily Volume Ratio LOS Increase Pacific Coast Highway 60,800 4 46,456 0.764 C 48,241 0.793 C 0.029 Warner Ave to Seapoint Ave Pacific Coast Highway 60,800 4 39,794 0,655 B 41,579 0.684 B 0.029 Seapoint Ave to Goldenwest St Pacific Coast Highway 37,500 4 42,711 1.139 F 44,881 1.197 F 0.058 Goldenwest Street to 6th Street Pacific Coast Highway 56,300 6 43,067 0.765 C 45,237 0.803 C 0 038 6th Street to First Street Pacific Coast Highway 56,300 6 43,810 0.778 C 43,810 0.778 C 0.000 First Street to Huntington Street Pacific City EIR 3.14-49 Chapter 3 Environmental Impact Analysis Table 3.14-14 Year 2008 Roadway Link Capacity Analysis Summary (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Year 2008 Background Year 2008 with Project LOS E Daily V/C v/V V'r Arterial Capacity Lanes Volume Ratio LOS Daily Volume Ratio LOS Increase Pacific Coast Highway 37,500 4 43,496 1.160 F 47,118 1.256 F 0.096 Huntington Street to Beach Blvd Pacific Coast Highway 56,300 6 46,612 0.828 D 50,002 0.888 D 0.060 Beach Blvd to Newland Street Pacific Coast Highway 56,300 6 46,477 0.826 D 49,615 0.881 D 0.055 Magnolia St to Brookhurst St Beach Boulevard 56,300 6 17,636 0.313 A 20,240 0.360 A 0.047 PCH to Atlanta Ave Beach Boulevard 56,300 6 25,629 0.455 A 29,408 0.522 A 0.067 Atlanta Ave to Indianapolis Ave Beach Boulevard 56,300 6 33,962 0.603 A 37,700 0.670 B 0.067 Indianapolis Ave to Adams Ave Beach Boulevard 56,300 6 46,249 0.821 D 49,382 0.877 D 0.056 Adams Ave to Yorktown Ave Beach Boulevard 56,300 6 50,962 0.905 E 53,608 0.952 E 0.047 Garfield Ave to Main St Atlanta Avenue 25,000 4 17,583 0.703 A 19,445 0.778 B 0.075 Beach Blvd to Delaware St Atlanta Avenue 25,000 4 10,312 0.825 D 10,589 0.424 A -0.401 1 st St to Huntington St Atlanta Avenue 18,000 2 12,004 0.667 B 14,235 0.791 C 0.124 Huntington St to Delaware St First Street 37,500 4 6,753 0.180 A 8,401 0.224 A 0.044 Atlanta Ave to Olive Ave Huntington Street 18,000 2 2,019 0.112 A 4,055 0.225 A 0.113 Atlanta Ave to Pacific View Ave Main Street 12,500 2 6,629 0.530 A 7,502 0.600 A 0.070 Palm Ave to Adams Ave Lake Street 18.000 2 6,420 0.357 A 6,805 0.378 A 0.021 Indianapolis Ave to Adams Ave Lake Street 18,000 2 9,630 0,535 A 10.015 0,556 A 0.021 Adams Ave to Yorktown Ave Adams Avenue 37,500 4 27,566 0.735 C 28,151 0.751 C 0,016 Beach Blvd to Newland St Indianapolis Avenue 25,000 2 7,788 0.312 A 7,983 0.319 A 0.007 Beach Blvd to Newland St Atlanta Avenue 25,000 4 18,173 0.727 A 18,839 0.754 A 0,027 Beach Blvd to Newland St Pacific View 18,000 2 538 0,030 A 7,579 0.421 A 0.391 First Street to Huntington Street Bold VIC and LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City and/or CMP LOS standards The roadway capacities in column(2)represent the capacities with project-specific improvements;however,Year 2008 Background LOS are based on existing capacities SOURCE Lnscott,Law 8 Greenspan 2003a 3.14-50 City of Huntington Beach 3.14 Transportation/Traffic Future Year 2008 Without Proposed Project An analysis of future (fear 2008) background traffic conditions in '['able 3.14-14 indicates that seven of the 25 study roadway segments are expected to operate at adverse service levels: ■ PCH: Goldenwest Street. to 6th Street (LOS F, V/C = 1.139) s PCH: Huntington Street to Beach Boulevard (LOS F, V/C = 1.160) ■ PCH: Beach Boulevard to Newland Street (LOS D, V/C = 0.828) ■ PCH-. Magnolia Street to Brookhurst. Street (LOS D, V/C = 0.826) ■ Beach Boulevard: Adams ,Avenue to Yorktown Avenue (LOS D, V/C = 0.821) ■ Beach Boulevard: Garfield Avenue to main Street Ellis Avenue (LOS F, V/C = 0.905) ■ Atlanta Avenue: Huntington Street to First. Street (LOS D, V/C = 0.825) The remaining 18 study roadway segments are, expected to operate at LOS C or better on a daily basis without the proposed project. Future Year 2008 With Proposed Project When the proposed project.-related traffic is combined with the background traffic (ambient plus cumulative projects), 6 of the 7 study roadway segments identified above (with the Atlanta Avenue segment as the exception) would experience an increase in V/C, but would continue to operate at the same adverse service levels: ® PCH: Goldenwest Street to 6th Street (LOS F, V/C = 1.197) e PCH: Huntington Street to Beach Boulevard (LOS F, V/C = 1.256) ■ PCH: Beach Boulevard to Newland Street (LOS D, V/C = 0.888) ■ PCH: Magnolia Street to Brookhurst Street (LOS D, V/C = 0.881) ■ Beach Boulevard: Adams ,Avenue to Yorktown ;Avenue (LOS D, V/C = 0.877) ■ Beach Boulevard: Garfield Avenue to main Street Ellis Avenue (LOS E, V/C = 0.952) As shown in Table 3.14-14, the Atlanta Avenue segment would improve to LOS A with the proposed project traffic. ']'his is due to project-specific improvements that would add additional lanes along the Atlanta avenue project frontage. Each of the 5 adversely affected study roadway segments would also experience a V/(--' increase greater than 0.0i0. F[ol%Tver, based on the City's impact criteria for roadway segments, none of the ;turfy roadway segments would have an adjacent study intersections) with adverse Pacific City EIR 3.14-51 Kevin Kelter& Leander Kelter 17122 Pleasant Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92649 (714)401-9710 Email: marylid@aol.com ��c�;t SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Mr. Rami Talleh Senior Planner RE�PZBUC ED FROM Ko City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning AS RECO�FOptN�CIL�ME tdt� 2000 Main Street OF CRY CL Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ,CITY CLERK April 23, 2009 Re: Tract Map NOS. 15377 and 15419 Traffic Congestion Mitigation Dear Rami, I appreciate the time you spent with me after the Tuesday meeting to discuss the stacking problem with traffic on Graham Street. Traffic congestion occurs during the busy morning and evening hours when the cars traveling north on Graham Street start backing up from Warner Avenue(see enclosed diagram)to the south. The result is that entry into the original Prestige Tract(where Leander Kelter resides),on Pendleton Street, is blocked and virtually impossible to exit onto Graham Street during the rush hours. We would like to see signage and pavement striping depicting"Do Not Block Intersection"or other traffic controlling measures implemented to allow residents normal access onto Graham Street. I also foresee future signalization at this intersection that will open Pendleton to normal traffic flow. These same measures should also be instituted at Kenilworth Drive immediately to the south. The city needs to consider synchronization of signals on Graham Street starting at Warner. The city has previously signals on Heil Avenue at both Plaza Drive and Graham Street to improve traffic flow from the Summer Lane Tract. It is imperative that Graham Street traffic flow properly because many drivers cut through the Prestige Tract and enter Warner Avenue from Greentree Lane. It should be noted that Greentree Lane has a severe downhill slope and with the increased traffic it will experience,this could lead to traffic related incidents. In addition,at certain times during the winter, intense and vision obscuring fog occurs in this area. Without proper delineations and signalization,the current traffic issues referenced above could also lead to very serious traffic accidents. The mutual goal here should be to improve safety conditions for pedestrians and commuters and safely improve traffic flow. I appreciate your time for addressing my concerns. Best Regards, Kevin Kelter Enclosure L�C1` e�vhfc�� ,/ mellel Ir�1CA�- . r� Sal & C tma.� 1 F `�•� ..�-. �,,'�,.� �. - >fi• '�'°^' ors �',,,.�`�i c u �! 5�� r"' r•� . etas ''�' ,. � _Rn. r:t�� n�] ��� �n F E � ,� - `�•" '•� :�� ��,�$.r. 'dsA; � .f� s S�� r t � R12 :,RF.* *-+3�'- ¢ " fii .���"1• � '�"! p cat �� .r �'�p�l.Ln. P? ��' 4* d a tr-,� / ,era •t � �, t�� '`" eb� wr r r: �.ru..;� t3• S " �� w. - -�ry �sq�.r,�hG�y ,"`'.r c � q�,m ,. '�� ��,f'r�:""� �- ::� ��� ->'..$ � p,. F�' � • ,•�_ � __ i�T i.� e .- .fit:�.p,��`ig>., _F `•�"` .� - -- - - - � --- - - .-ate�.. � �?'_ � ¢�.. :�''st�•'`a'*-"� t :...:,�rJC,.�t Page 1 of 1 Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@ user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 8:29 AM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 1073 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to.Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on Agenda Items Citizen name: Mary Quinlan Description: From: Mary Quinlan [mailto:Mary.Quinlan@oempresssystems.com] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 4:46 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Cc: Scott Fisher(E-mail) Subject: Shea Parkside project and Entitlement Plan Amendment Importance: High Dear City Council members, I would like to let you know that as a resident of the neighborhood adjacent to the site at 17301 Graham (aka "the beanfield")that my family and I am firmly OPPOSED to the amendment of the Shea Parkside project and Entitlement Plan Amendment 08-08 as agreed upon with the Coastal Commission. Our primary objection to the zoning map amendment is that it reduces the agreed upon size of parkland from 8 acres to 2 acres - a three fold reduction. It is my contention that the interest of Shea Homes is solely in the construction of homes for profit and that they will continue to negotiate with the City of Huntington Beach to develop more area in order to build more homes and that they will fail to meet their obligations to their fellow residents of Huntington Beach (the reduction of parkland above being a prime example). An agreement was reached with the Coastal Commission, over the objections of local residents and the recommendation of environmental experts,which outlined how much space should be developed, how much space was to be dedicated to parkland,water treatment system, etc. as well as the obligations of Shea Homes. That agreement should be upheld and no further amendments allowed. Please reject the General Plan amendment No. 98-01(R), Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-05(R), Local coastal program amendment no. 09-01, Zoning Text Amendment No. 09-05, Revised tentative tract maps Nos. 15377 and 15419, and Entitlement plan amendment No. 08-08. Sincerely, Mary Quinlan and Scott Fisher 5352 Glenroy Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Expected Close Date: 06/03/2009 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. 6/2/2009 Page 1 of 2 Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 8:28 AM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 1072 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on Agenda Items Citizen name: Joannah Lewis Description: From: Joannah Lewis [mailto:joannahlewis@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 4:53 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Graham Street Land Development To the City Council: My husband and I are new to Huntington Beach. We moved here more than 9 months ago after an exhaustive search throughout Orange County. We finally found an environment we wanted: decent-sized homes, good neighborhoods, great schools, ocean breezes, pollution-free air away from freeways and major thoroughfares. The clean air and the ocean breezes were essential to me, because I am somewhat of an anomaly in Southern California- I am allergic to smog. I am writing to you now because the ocean breeze that comes through my new home is now in jeopardy. Shea homes is planning on building a subdivision directly behind my home and blocking the breezes I have come to love. As my local representation I urge you to represent me, and not approve the land development today. Put off the decision, do some research, conduct an impact study - but do not approve the land development. I'm sure once you look into the issue you'll be amazed at what you find. The land on Graham Street, an empty lot that's now used by Shea homes as a planting ground for beans and other agriculture -has become a public space. I know this because my backyard looks onto the land and I see it every day. From dawn to past dusk, runners, bikers, dog-walkers, children and power walkers will pass my backyard fence on their way to the Bolsa Chica wetlands. The stream of traffic is constant, it's rare when I don't see at least one person pass every 15 minutes. The lot has become a public place, whether Shea homes wants it or not. I know the plans for the subdivision call for a trail on one side of the property - but it's not sufficient. Any buildings that go up in that space will become a Page 2 of 2 barrier: an obstacle that needs to be passed on the way to the wetlands. Today, people park alongside Kenilworth for their morning and evening runs - do you think that will still happen with a subdivision there? Most likely not. I do not want a subdivision behind my home. I do not want homes blocking the ocean breezes I have come to think of as mine. I do not want houses built 5 feet above my home or a T-intersection that shines headlights and exhaust fumes into my backyard. I do want the City Council to do something about this subdivision. I want you to research purchasing the land back from Shea homes that was sold 13 years ago by the water district. I want it to be turned into a park, a natural water filtering plant, or the wetlands expanded - I want that land to be open space. There's a website devoted to gathering local opinion about the land development and it can be seen at: www.grahamstreetwetlands.com - I hope that you take the time to read the comments left by the locals, and find out local sentiments. I appreciate you taking the time to read my letter, and if you do not deny the subdivision's plan approvals at tonights meeting - I hope you at least postpone your decision until you've researched all the facts. Thank you, Joannah Lewis 5282 Kenilworth Dr. Expected Close Date: 06/03/2009 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. 6/2/2009 gr V4 _� Exl- . � � . lei 'R�i - ;11 3. loll i r aF 1; 4 � EGGW Groundwater Impacts Mark Bixby — 06/01/09 Sheet Piling - January 2008 s CC p _ - b j � r CP Groundwater — 03/30/07 4i Permeable Joint Design C:1' ,Y. ` �..�- + Shea Properly �I CP Wetland Parcel FNV.3 ��' � • �f Well Location Map — Walnr Elevations.Tiles,anJ Ramia 11 On3a Sheet Pilin -Slieei t'iXGstallatiun january X?Iq8 _ 1 _ q) ENV-1 �Erid � maw - ir�-rY�swv�aM1�iMmM Tim. N v� Water Eletations,Tides,and Rainfall Data '1�Ofe C IRON - r - 3 AShea Property � } ENV- / ` CP Wetland Parcel �'1< w SyA/aPi 1 K' 411" t • .�� 4 if ` � «l5A / �4 �N7• ��r • N flCm Otus u� RO�14 Well Location .Alap _ """w 2 Sheet Piling Trwipw is �a a a I:. a ra. x4a. .ra �sw xrr or rr sky s.. rare ar w aae +w .�:. NVIRON Water Elmrions,7Ydes�and Rainfall Data _ —` 3a � _,� � �...p.-�.. l i ' ` � n t jr �'' � 1 �ij i l' /a�n P i> h r �\ �'� � ti � � .. �: fir, � � '? .� � .' _� . X. � r ;' '� A ��il llil .,.� r` , .ill'i i ,�. Gro.ndw.ur Monitorio•Wea Data vo..me..s,zmt Adjacent to Channel (Shallow) Sheet Piling a'm _ am a am ---. —' _ r — . -rm - rom I i -um .1xm .lam —... . .nm 30.m a c ,eP'a l�v r'S iO4t4t eA44 ,,1' 4s,R'0 ' 0 0 4dt�0 4 ,4'�$e�dy��1t� tar Flrare e-z / IVAI / / • , / w'"t Oitle 10"°0 Groundwater Monitoring Nell Data �a's°'�e�®°%� Mrember]s,]W6 North Boundary (Shallow) Sheet Piling �m am -- am unto ]0D MW-5 Apr-Dec Peak-to-Ebb Delta ,am :m 2006 -1 25k nm -,am 2007 -1.50ft wm 2008 'nW a u Flp,BJ Mat�"�� GrounJxalcr Moniluring Nrll Ualn v,,,c:>.dl.eo�n..ny,is. Wv.mRc}.Xm! 200-300 feet from Channel (Shallow) Sheet Piling i MW-13 Previous Minimum sm — am - am .m =•- �— — — — �— — aw :. .-.......::._ .-....r............: T_- —-_— --- MW-13 New Minimtmf d6m _ 24m sr zz ,, e�act5.t ,�st vy.,.s� Significant Impacts To-Date fir The Problems Could Worsen cam, ni<«a i OCP\V County Data Coming in July J ' 1I'// Too Many Unanswered Questions ■ \ h% did the sheet mile tail to alto"". seepage a� intended= ■ l lo\\ tar a,,v:n from the channel do the impacts and risks extend? ■ 1 low will current impacts be mitigated-:, ■ l love Neill the design be changed to avoid future impacts A Subsequent EIR is Required NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, June 1, 2009, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ® 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 98-01(R), ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 96- 05(R), LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 09-01, ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 09-05 REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 15377 AND 15419, ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 08-08 (REVISIONS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-90 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-18 ) PARKSIDE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT): Applicant: A. Richard Fitch, Jr., Hunsaker&Associates Request: GPA: To revise previously approved GPA No. 98-01 to redesignate 23.1 acres of RL-7 (Residential Low Density) and OS-P (Open Space-Park) property to OS-C (Open Space—Conservation) and to amend the Land Use Element by adding Subarea 4K on the Huntington Beach Sub-Area map and adding Subarea 4K to the Community District and Subarea Schedule. ZMA: To revise previously approved ZMA No. 96-05 to rezone approximately 19.4 acres of RL (Low Density Residential) and OS-PR (Open Space-Park and Recreation Subdistrict) property to CC (Coastal Conservation). ZTA: To amend the City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance as follows: A) Amend Chapter 210 to reference the Subarea 4K requirements; B) Amend Chapter 216 to reference the Subarea 4K requirements and add additional performance standards for CC areas throughout the coastal zone; C) Amend Chapter 221 to add a new section for Resource Protection Requirements for New Development and add a phasing requirement; and D) Amend Chapter 230 to incorporate a reference to the requirement to comply with federal, state, regional and local water quality regulations. LCPA: To amend the City's Local Coastal Program and Implementation Program in accordance with the ZMA and ZTA and forward to the California Coastal Commission for certification. TTM: To revise previously approved plans for the Parkside residential development and subdivide approximately 45 acres into 111 numbered lots and 29 lettered lots (Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15377) for single family dwelling purposes including newly created, restored and preserved wetlands and buffer area, a protected Eucalyptus grove, a Natural Treatment System Water Quality basin (NTS), a vegetated flood protection barrier, a trail system, and dedication and improvement of an approximately 1.0 acre public active park and 0.57 acre public passive park; and subdivide approximately 4.8 acres into one (1) lot (Revised Tentative Tract Map No. 15419) for open space and wetland restoration area. EPA: To amend Conditional Use Permit No. 96-90 and Coastal Development Permit No. 96-18 (in concept) and reduce the number of single family dwelling units to 111 units; reduce the public park to 1.57 acres; and increase the amount of open space by creating, restoring, and preserving wetlands and buffer area, a protected Eucalyptus grove, a Natural Treatment System Water Quality basin (NTS), a vegetated flood protection barrier, and a trail system. Location: 17301 Graham Street (west side of Graham Street, south of Warner Avenue, adjacent to the Wintersburg Flood Control Channel) Project Planners: Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager, and Rami Talleh, Senior Planner (g\legals\2009\090601(Parkside) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No. 1 which includes Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 09-01 and Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 08-08 filed on November 18, 2008, which amends Coastal Development 96-18 in concept, is located within the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and an Area of Deferred Certification of the Coastal Zone. Final action is conditional upon the California Coastal Commission certifying Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 09-01 and approving a final Coastal Development Permit. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Local Coastal Program Amendment and Entitlement Plan Amendment hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action. City Council action on the Local Coastal Program Amendment will be forwarded to the California Coastal Commission for approval. City Council action on the approval in concept may be appealed to the California Coastal Commission within ten (10)working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the California Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations, or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. The California Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office, 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802-4302, phone number: (310) 570-5071. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No. 1 is covered by Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 97-2, prepared by EDAW Inc., and certified by the City Council on October 21, 2002; Addendum EIR to EIR No. 97-02 dated May, 2009; the California Coastal Commission's environmental review of LCP No. 01-06 under section 21080.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and sections 15251(c) and 15265 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and City Council Resolution No. 4501, Class 20, which supplements CEQA. The preparation and adoption of Local Coastal Program Amendments is exempt from the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to Section 21080.9 of CEQA and Sections 15251 (F) and 15265 of Title 14, California Code of Regulations. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Friday, May 29, 2009. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Joan Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 GTegals\City Council\2009\090601 (Parkside) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN9 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCILOF THE Huntington Beach Independent has been adjudged a newspaper of gen CITY OF HUNTINGTON,BEACH circulation in Huntington Beach and Orange County by Decree of the Sup' NOTICE;IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,June'1,2009,at 6:00 p.m.in the City Council Chambers;: Court of Orange County, State of California, under date of Aug. 24, 1994, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following, A50479. planning and zoning items: , ❑1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.98-01tR1 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT N PROOF 96-05(R) "O A A TA"PRO A AMENDMENT 'O 0 1ZONING ®FT XT AMENDMENT-NO.09-05,REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS.15377'AND ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO,08-08 PERMIT NO:96,90' (REVIO ONDITIONAL USE AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT MO9818)PARK91DEPUBL1CATI®l RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT): ADDlicant: A.'Richaed Fitch,Jr.,Hunsaker&Associates eauest;_CPA To revisg previously approved GPA No 98-01 to redesignate 23.1 acres`.; of RL--7(Residential Low Density)and OS-P(Qpen Space-Park)propertyto OS-C(Open, Space—Conservation)and to amend the Land Use Element by adding Subarea 4K"on T Y�®�p T� the Huntington Beach Sub-Area map and adding Subarea 4K to the Community District STATE OF CAL IFORNIA )i�{ A ) and Subarea Schedule.ZN&To revise previously approved ZMA No.96-05 to rezone approximately 19.4 acres of RL(Low Density Residential)and OS-PR(Open',Space-Park SS. and Recreation Subdistrict)property to CC(Coastal Conservation).:ZI&To 5amend,the City,of Huntington Beach`Zoning`and Subdivision Ordinance as:follows;A)ArnendChapter COUNTY �� ®�{ ORANGE�(!�' l 210 to,reference'the Subarea,4K•requirements;8)Amend Chapter 216 to reference v dJ 1�1 A R A v J the Subarea 4K requirements and add additional performance standards for CC areas throughout the'coastal zone;C)Amend Chapter 221 to add a new section for.Resource Protection Requirements for New Developmentand add,a phasing'requirement;and D). am the Citizen of the United States and a Amend Chapter,230 to incorporate a reference to the.requirement to complywith federal, resident of the County aforesaid, I am Over state,regional and°local water quality regulations; LCPA: To amend the City's Local Coastal'Program'and,Implementation Program in accordancewith the ZMAandZTA'and the age of eighteen ears and not a party forward to the California Coastal Commission for certification. j�;'To revi a previously g g Y ,approved plans for the Parkside residential development and subdivide approximately 45,acres Into 111 numbered lots and 29,lettered lots ReviseclTematrve Tract Ma No t0 Or Interested In the below entitled matter. 15377)for single familydwelling purposes including newt created restored and preserved 9P P 9 - Y P . am a principal clerk of the HUNTI NGTON wetlands and buffer area,a protected Eucalyptus grove,a Natural TreatmentSystem Water BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper Of Quality basin(NTS),a vegetated flood protection barrier,a trail system,,and dedicatiomand improvement of an approximately1.0acrepublicactiveparkand0.57acrepublicpassive general circulation printed and published in park;andsubdivide approximately 4.8 acres into one(1)lot(RevisedTentativeTractMap P p No.15419)for open space and wetland restoration area., EPA To amend'Conditional Use the City of Huntington Beach, County of Permit No.96-'90 and Coastal Development Permit No:96-18(in concept)and reduce the number of single family dwelling units,to 111 units reduce the,public-park to 1.57 acres; Orange, State of California, and the and increase the amount of.open space by creating,7estoring,and preserving,wetlands and; ` buffer area,a protectea'Eucalyptus grove,a Natural-Treatment System-Water,.Quality basin attached Notice is a true and complete copy (NTS),a yegetated flood protection barrier,and a trail system. Location: 17301 Graham as Was printed and published on the Street(westsideofGraham Street'south'ofWarnerAvenue,adiaoenttotheWiniersburg Flood Control Channel)Proiect Planners Mary Beth Broeren,Planning Manager,and following date(s): Rami-Talleh,Senior'P.lahner NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No.;1,which includes Local Coastal Prog ram'Amendment No. 09-01 and Entitlement Plan'Amendment No,08-08 filed on November 18,2008,which amends Coastal Development 96=18 in,concept;isiocated within the appealablejurisdiction of the Coastallone and,. an Area of,Deferred Certification of the Coastal Zone. Final"action is conditional upon the"Califomia- Coastal Commission certifying Local Coastal Program Amendment No.09-01 and approving a final Coastal Development Permit," NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Local Coastal Program Amendment and Entitlement Plan, Amendment hearing consists of a staff report,public hearing;City Council discussion and action. City Council action on the Local Coastal Program Amendment will be forwarded to,the California Coastal May 21, 2009 Commission for approval.City Council action on the approval in concept may be appealed to the California Coastal Commission within ten'(10)working days from the date of receipt'of the notice of final- City action by the California Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning.and,Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Cod6ef Regulations,or unless Title 14,Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable.The California Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office,200 Oceangate,10th Floor,Long Beach;CA 90802- 4302,phone number: (310)570-5071. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No.1 is covered by Environmental Impact Report(EIR)No: 97-2,prepared by EDAW Inc.,and certified by the City Council on October 21,2002;Addendum EIR to I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the EIR No:97-02 dated May,2009;the California Coastal Commission's environmental review of LCP No. p Y p '7' 01-06 under section 21080.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and sections 15251(c) foregoing Is true and correct. and 15265 of the State CEQA Guidelines;and City Council Resolution No.4501,Class 20,which supplements CEQA. The preparation and adoption of Local Coastal Program Amendments is exempt from the requirements of CEQA,pursuant to Section 21080.9 of CEQA and Sections 15251(F)and 15265 of Title 14,California Code of Regulations. gN FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office,2000 Main Street, Executed on May 26, 2009 Huntington Beach,California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Friday,May 29,2009. at Costa Mesa, California ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the,public hearing described in this notice,'or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public, hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at(714)536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk.- Sign e Joan Flynn,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC NEARING REQUEST FORM MEETING DATE: ��V�. , g001 SUBJECT: � u DEPARTMENT: Q1a CONTACT NAME: PHONE:—el� I (A-7 N/A YES NO ( ) (a�/ ) Is the notice attached? ( ) ( ) Do the heading and closing of the notice reflect a hearing before the City / Council and/or Redevelopment Agency? Are the date, day and time of the public hearing correct? (v) ( )/ ( ) If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice? If Coastal Development Permit, does the notice include appeal language? ( ) ( ) ( V11( Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? ( ) ( ) ( Is a map attached for �!L ( ) ` (L,4 Is a larger ad required? Size E � Is the verification statement attached indicating a source a d accuracy of the mailing list? ( ) Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ( ) ( ) Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( v)� ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, are the resident labels attached? Is Summary Report 33433 attached? (Redevelopment Agency items only) What is the minimum number of days from publication to hearing date? 0 What is the minimum number of times to be published? What is the specified number of days between publications? 6 FOR ADMINISTRATION AND CITY CLERK USE ONLY Approved for public hearing Date noticed to newspaper _ Date published Date notices mailed /0 RCA Process Training Manual 10-05-06 -24- Y 09-008-L F w do-do al aalanaJ luawa6aeya 1 009L5 M3AV 1!aege6 al zasill}(1; P-s Peel® � I uas '" y 1uorrane_Mnnnn r 'att e a� e za 8'd along Iirf�tS a }�a3>g� Ose Avery® letup ate S7bu� l e ajier ex ose Pop-Up Edges^^ President 1 Huntington Harbor POA 10 Sue Johnson 16 H.B_ Chamber of C'onuuerce P.O. Box 791 19671 Qmet ' aae 19891 Beach Blvd_, Ste. 140 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 Huntia, i Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 l Dave Stefanides 2 A. Richard Fitch, Jr. Shea Homes Orange County Assoc. of Realtors Hunsaeker & Associates 1250 Corona Point Cdurt 25552 La Paz Road 3 Hughes Suite 600 Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Irvine CA 92618 Corona CA 92879 President 3 Jeffrey M. Oderman 12 Pacific Coast Archaeological 18 Amigos De Bolsa Cluca RUTAN &TUCKER,LLP Society, Inc- P.O. Box 1563 611 Anton Blvd., 14� P.O. Box 10926 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Costa Mesa 626-1950 Costa Mesa,CA 92627 Attu_Jane Gothold Sunset Beach Community As 4 Pres.,H.B. Hist.Society 13 Director 19 Pat Thies,President C/O Newland House Museum O.C. Plug & Dev Services Dept. PO Box 215 19820 Beach Blvd. P.O_ Box 4048 Sunse h,CA 90742-0215 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 President 5 Community Services Dept. 14 Bryan Speegte 19 Huntington Beach Tomorrow Chairperson O. C. Resources &Develop_ Mgt_ Dept_ PO Box 865 Historical Resources Bd_ P. O. Box 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Julie Vandermost 6 Council on Aging 1 Planning Director 20 BIA-OC 1706 Orange Ave_ City of Costa Mesa 17744 ark Circle,#170 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 1 O. Box 1 ae CA 92614-4441 Cos - esa, CA 92628-1200 Richard Spicer 7 Jeff Metzel 16 Planning Director 21 SCAG Seacliff HOA City of Fountain V 818 West 7th, 1 oor 19391 Shady Harbor C* cle 10200 State 'e. Los An CA 90017 Huntington Beach,C 92648 Fount Valley,CA 92708 Jean I{Iznbrell 8 John Roe 16 Planning Director 22 c/o E.T.I.Corral 100 Seacliff 1IOA City of Newport 20292 Eastwood Cir. 19382 Surfd e Lane P.O_ Box Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntingtoc each,CA-92648 New Beach,CA 92663-8915 Dave Guido 9 Lou Zannone 16 Planning Di - or 23 Environniental Board Chairman Se tiff HOA CiE() e1=1nter1eBrlvd_ 21241 Loclea Lane 1 821 Ocean B1uEECircle 82 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 untington Beach CA 92648 ter,CA 92683 Planning Director 24 Nancy Sebring 31 HB Hamptons HO 38 City of Seal Be i Ocean_\rtew El entary School District Progressive C nuruty Mgrnt. 211 Eight 17200 Pine rst Lane 27405 'iv' a Real,##300 Seal ch,CA 90740 / Hunfin each CA 9264(7 Missio Tejo,CA 92691 T � y&a6P3 do-dod asodxa Jaded a�� ( 009L5 a}eldwaj odaany asB wl 6uole ,fz a la ac ure afro e ; wvvw.averVlgq ®load fisery .®R i i Sens°�1� __ i m i i _Qnn ter,-nvrov i •A����'��' ! yt�h�ff�� ��ta� a aflr���.prt4>> i; ®Q�.�� �lr��'�3�������. t ��ca�n@aanaac� Ilk California Coastal Commission 25 (J,irh Hampton 32 Sally Graham 39 Theresa Henry \lrqinun5ter School Dist / Meadowlark Area South Coast Area Office 14121 Cedanroudenue 516I Gelding Circle 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor �C'estminster�1 92683 1 Iuntingion B., n,CA 92649 Lung Beach,CA 92802-4302. California Coastal Commission 25 Stephen hitter 33 Cheryle Browning 39 South Coast Area Office HB Union High School Drsrict Meadowlark a 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor 5832 Bolsa Avenue 16771 osevelt Lanc Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 Huntington Beach — 92649 I ntington Beach,CA 92649 Ryan P- Chamberlain 26 I-Iearthside Homes 40 Caltrans Distric 6 Executive Circle,Suite 250 3337 Mic son Drive,Suite 380 Irvine, CA 92614 Iry 92612-1699 Director 27 Goldenwest College 35 Bolsa Cluca Land"Trust 41 Local Solid Waste Enf_ A Attn: Fred Owens 5200 Warner Avenue, Ste. 103 O.C. Health Care A cy 15744 Goldenw t. Huntington Beach,CA 92649 P.O. Box 355 Huntington each CA 92647 Santa 'A 92702 New Growth Coordinator 28 OC County Harbors,B 36 Bolsa Cluca Land Trust 41 Hrmtington Beach Post ce and Parks De - Evan Henry, President 6771 Warner Av P-O. Bo 48 1812 Port Tiffin Place I-Iuntingto each,CA 92647 San la,CA 92702-4048 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Marc Ecker 29 Bella Terra Mall 7 Fountain Valley Elem-Sc t Dist. Attn: Pat Rogers- ude 10055 Slater Aven 7777 Ellin Ave. 9300 Fountain V CA 92708 Iluntit on Beach CA 92647 Dr. Gary Rutherford,Super. 30 Country View Estates H _ 38 OC Sanitation Dis 42 FIB City Elementary School Dist. Carrie"I'tiomas 10844 Etlis A r ue 20451 Craimer Lan 6642"Trotte rive Fountain alley CA 92708 Huntington B CA 92648 Hun65V4n Beach CA 92648 David Perry 30 Country View Estates HOA 38 Eric Pendegraft, Plant Manager � 42 HB City Elementa School Dist. Gerald Chapman AES Huntington Beach, LLC 20451 Crai ,are 6742 Shire Circl 21730 Newland Street I Iuntin Beach,CA 92648 Huntington each CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 926 RiZo 42 Huntington each Girls Softball* 47 AYSO Region 56 47 90rive Mike Ern son Commissioner Joh Gray Hh CA 9 6 P_O- B x 3943 9522 Smokey Cir e Huntington Beach,CA 92605-3943 Huntington Be h,CA 92646 Jo42 AYSO/shard Re 47 AYSO Re on 55' 47 22 Lane ,John Commi oner Russ MarlowHh CA 92646 19961 18111 rentwell Circle// /� Fount , A 9270$��/CJ? Huntington Beach,CA 92647 FIB Coastal Comm ties Assoc_ 43 1-luntingtou VAticv Little League 47 1-Ill Fich] ockey` 47 David Guidt Joel G Jill :Ahnital Pad ar 143 E. -ats Avenue P.O Bo_ 51 I1 17782 N zler Dr_ Or ge,CA 92865 Hunwipt a Beach, CA 92015 1 luntingto Beach,CA 92647 Do>_Ste.ve Bust . s Ass ciation 44 AYSO Reg on 143 47 HB Po fiTamer Football** 47 Mr. els Commissio er Phillip Hice Paul [o 200treet#106 5552 Harol I Place P_O_ Box 506 Hu Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntingtot each,CA 92615 Downtown Reside ssociation 45 Fountain Va ey Pony Baseball* 47 North H Soccer Club 47 Ms. Marie St. r-main Chris Mahon v President G rge %tton 505 Alab, 21212 Shaw L e 18601 Newtan Street, #94 Htmtin n Beach,CA 92648 Huntington B tch,CA 92646 Fluntin each,CA 92646 Chairperson 46 H. B.Jr. All-An -rican Football** 47 Robinwoo ttle League 47 Gabrieleno/Tongva Tribal Council Randy Wooten Dona Car PO Box 693 P.O. Box 2245 P.O Box 138 San Gabriel,CA 91778 Huntirgton Bea h,CA 92647 Huntingto each,CA 92647 Juaneno Band of Mission Indians 46 Huntington Bcai h Soccer League* 47 Seavie Jule League 47 Acjachemen Nation Felipe Zapata Brian Semmelr th 31411 La Matanza Street 18442 Steep Lam, 43 P_O Box 5305 San Juan Capistrano,CA 92675-2625 Huntington Bea It,CA 92648 1 huitingto each CA 92615 South Coast Soccer Clu ** 47 Ocean View Littl League 47 Wes Village HOA 48 President M Soccer Phil Shearer, Pre dent 5200 BI pool 8921 Cresc_ t Dove 18141 Brentuell :ircle We Wins CA 92683 y, Hun d on Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beac i,CA 92647 V West Co-Family YMCA` 47 South FIB Girls F t Pitch Softball,* 47 Gary Brown 49 Michael Turner Frank LoGrasso Coastkeepers 2100 Main Street 9432 Alii Circle 3151 Amway Ave.Suite F-110 Huntington ach CA 92646 Huutington Beac ,CA 92646 Costa NI[sa,CA 92663 1 Regional Environmental Officer for Calif 50 Fort Irwin 50 Fort ggeit 50 Western R�ree.tSuite Office Lt Col Paul D_ -rawer Mr Pete in US Air Fo Director of Publ c Works Nat'l Training Cutr Direct f Public Works 333 Marke25 P O Box 105097 Combat up ort Training Center San Francisco C 94105-2196 Fort Irwin CA 92 10 B790 5a, Parks - 'A Dublin CA 945680 Sheila Donovan 50 Patrick Christm ,Director 50 Gold Co Extreme 47 Community Plans& 'aison Coordinator Western Region :nvironmental Office Rick Bane resident US Navy US Marine Co Building 1164 20501 rbia Lane 1220 Pacific way Box 555246 Hunha nt Beach,CA 92646 San Die CA 92132-5190 Camp Pendlet n CA 92055-5246 South Coast Bayern - tbol Club 4 California F tbol Club 47 District 62 Cl allenger Division 47 Marissa Pena Hector Agu ar Gail Harder 22222 Euc tus Lane 10571 Davit r ��� 17961 _ircle Lake For t7 CA 9263� Garden Grove, Huntington Beach,CA 92647 ® a m � luawabaey� i !jL e a'6 Al13At/-09-008-1 , Widn-dod pjogaa al jaiqnaa ap suas i ®0945 pJlb3nt/; q I zasi I i�n worf(aane-MMM ap uge aln43ey ei a zaiidab ® naiad a say:)e;sallanbilg 110 016 11 1 110 016 12 2 110 016 15 3 STATE C FOR CALIFORNIA ST LANDS COMMISSI Landmark Signal 100 we e 100 Howe Ave #100 6 Executive Cir#250 ra to 95825 Sacramento CA 95825 Irvine CA 92614 11001616 4 11001618 5 11001619 6 SIGNAL COMPANIES INC Donald Goodell SHEA HOMES LIMITED 6 Executive Cir 16571 Channel Ln PO Box 487 Irvine CA 92614 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Walnut CA 91788 11001620 7 11001621 11001622 9 SHEA HOMES LIMITED STATE O CAL RNI STATE OF CALIFORNIA 655 Brea Canyon Rd 100 e A 100 Howe Ave#100 Walnut CA 91789 S rame o CA;25 Sacramento CA 95825 11001623 10 11001624 11 11001625 12 SHEA HOMES LIMITED Landmar igna �� STATE ALIFOR A 655 Brea Canyon Rd 6 Ex tive 92 10 owe Ave Walnut CA 91789 Ir ' e C 26 acramento CA �25 11001629 13 11001630 14 11001633 15 STATE I O A STATE AL1 O CITY UIYTI N BEACH 100 ve Sa meat 20 Mai S ra ento 95825 cra o 95825 untington Be A 92648 1100163 16 11001637 7 16303101 18 Land Si al Landmar i Jeffrey Murdock 6 ecu ' e Cir#2 6 Ex ti Cir 0 17072 Saint Andrews Ln rvine A 9261 Irv' e A 92 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 031 02 19 163 031 03 20 163 032 01 21 Patricia Johnson Carlo Magno Leal Chris Roza 17052 Saint Andrews Ln 17042 Saint Andrews Ln 5342 El Dorado Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 02 22 163 032 03 23 163 032 04 24 H E Durbin II Scott McGregor Kenneth John O'Brien 5352 El Dorado Dr 5362 El Dorado Dr 5372 El Dorado Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 05 25 163 032 06 26 163 032 07 27 Gerrit Smouse Carleen Ono Huan Hoang 5382 El Dorado Dr 5392 El Dorado Dr 5412 El Dorado Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 08 28 163 032 09 29 163 032 10 30 Sharon Cops Jeffrey Alan Windle Theodore& G Reed 5422 El Dorado Dr 17041 Saint Andrews Ln 17051 Saint Andrews Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T r Wla6P3 do-dod asodxa jaded Pal , p091S axeidwal oAjany asn wi096S ®AU3A-V ��/� of auii 6uoie pua8 ® �S/�� slage-1 oiaad Rseg T AU3nt1-OD-008-L wide-dod pjogaa a1 a819AO ap sua5 A luawabaegp t @09LS®AU3A</1!Aege6 al zas!l!m � wor�(aane•nnnnnn ap w}e aanq� a eq el zaildaa su i waled a sal!,e}saiianb!13 163 032 11 31 163 032 12 32 163 032 13 33 Linda Cates Joseph & G A Kijewski Janis Newsome 17071 Saint Andrews Ln 17081 Saint Andrews Ln 17091 Saint Andrews Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 14 34 163 032 15 35 163 032 16 36 D Dean Nelson William Simpson Mary Anderson 719 Whimbrel Ct 17111 Saint Andrews Ln 1111 S Coast Dr#D202 Nipomo CA 93444 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Costa Mesa CA 92626 163 032 17 37 163 032 18 38 163 032 19 39 Hymavathi Atluri Carlos Diaz Steven Blokdyk 17131 Saint Andrews Ln 1011 SE 5th Ave 17151 Saint Andrews Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Pompano Beach FL 33060 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 20 40 163 032 21 41 163 032 22 42 William Panzich Robert Sutton Daniel LaPrelle 17152 Pleasant Cir 17142 Pleasant Cir 17132 Pleasant Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 23 43 163 032 24 44 163 032 25 45 Leander Kelter Anthony Patalano Richard Reinhart 17122 Pleasant Cir 17112 Pleasant Cir 17102 Pleasant Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 26 46 163 032 27 47 163 032 28 48 Thomas Campbell Willie Kimble Joseph Feliciani 17092 Pleasant Cir 17082 Pleasant Cir 17072 Pleasant Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 29 49 163 032 30 50 163 032 31 51 Louis Harrigan Stuart Nicol Tb Glavas 17071 Pleasant Cir 17081 Pleasant Cir 17091 Pleasant Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 32 52 163 032 33 53 163 032 34 54 Jenness-Schicking Schickling Firasi Jamal Craig Harris Kievman 17101 Pleasant Cir 17111 Pleasant Cir 17121 Pleasant Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 35 55 163 032 36 56 163 032 37 57 William Curran William Kent Resch Dennis Hashin 17131 Pleasant Cir 17141 Pleasant Cir 17151 Pleasant Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 38 58 163 032 39 59 163 032 40 60 Martin Annenberg Kevin Frers Gary Mueller 17152 Camelot Cir 14142 Camelot Cir 17132 Camelot Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 wla6P3 do-dod asodxa jaded paaj 009LS a}eldwal @)AJany asn w1096S ®AU3A� /�/Q� o}awl 6uo!e puce ��/— stage l ®land Ase3 T A2l3A`d-09-008-6 W,dn-dod piogaa al jalanaa IUOWabaeq: 009LS @)4H3Ad Ilaege'6 al zasllgn ap sues wog�Gane nnnnnn ap ul;e ainq�eq el a zalldall salad a sal!:)a j sal;anbll3 163 032 41 61 163 032 42 62 163 032 43 63 Gary Roy Chrisman David Beran Spencer Letourneau 17122 Camelot Cir 17112 Camelot Cir 17102 Camelot Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264 9 163 032 44 64 163 032 45 65 163 032 46 66 Kunihei Kawasaki Michael William Wendt Dalessandro 17092 Camelot Cir 17082 Camelot Cir 17072 Camelot Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16303247 67 163 032 48 68 163 032 49 69 Bess Luke Weston Gary Morrill Joseph Johnson 17071 Camelot Cir 17081 Camelot Cir 17091 Camelot Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264) 16303250 70 163 032 51 71 163 032 52 72 Joseph Brunnworth Steven &Nina Fosdick Sharon Richter 17101 Camelot Cir 17111 Camelot Cir 17121 Camelot Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 032 53 73 163 032 54 74 163 032 55 75 Donald Pichovich Michael James Kamola Ngoc-Oanh Thi Tran 17131 Camelot Cir 17141 Camelot Cir 17151 Camelot Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 033 01 76 163 033 02 77 163 033 03 78 Fred DeNuccio Douglas Bacon Jr. Cyrus Hardiman 17092 Saint Andrews Ln 17102 Saint Andrews Ln 17112 Saint Andrews Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 033 04 79 163 033 05 80 163 033 06 81 K P & L E Cobb Michael Bouma Richard Gregory 17122 Saint Andrews Ln 17132 Saint Andrews Ln 17142 Saint Andrews Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 033 07 82 163 033 08 83 163 033 09 84 Vets Affairs Dept Rupert Yoshikawa Roderick Houston Jones 17152 Saint Andrews Ln 17172 Saint Andrews Ln 17182 Saint Andrews Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 033 10 85 163 033 11 86 163 034 01 87 Dale McBride K&A Petrimoulx Randy Matusoff 17192 Saint Andrews Ln 17202 Saint Andrews Ln 5432 Glenroy Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 034 02 88 163 034 03 89 163 034 04 90 Michael Bailey Peter LeFort Lee Haber 5422 Glenroy Dr 5402 Glenroy Dr 5392 Glenroy Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 w�a0p3 dn-dod asodxa jaded paal F- ®09LS ajeldwal®taand ash of aul 6uoe pua / " lb _ slagel®laad Ase3 w0965 �AU3A A2i3A�d-09-008-1 w,dn-dod paogaa al,alana, luawabaeg3 I pog15®Aimv wege6 at zaslttin ap suas 1. wow(aane MMM ap up wnWey el a zagdaa V aalad a salpel sai anbl13 16303405 91 163 034 06 92 163 034 07 93 William Steele Michael David Distel Sayoko Baker 5382 Glenroy Dr 5372 Glenroy Dr 5362 Glenroy Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 034 08 94 163 034 09 95 163 034 10 96 Mary Quinlan George Clemens Eric Harenburg 5352 Glenroy Dr 5342 Glenroy Dr 5332 Glenroy Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 034 11 97 163 034 12 98 163 034 13 99 D J & L S Fillet William Masilek Brian Ponchak 5331 Kenilworth Dr 1127 10th St#201 5351 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Santa Monica CA 90403 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 034 14 100 163 034 15 101 163 034 16 102 William Arlow Newton Anderson Janice Sadler 5361 Kenilworth Dr 5371 Kenilworth Dr 5381 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 034 17 103 163 034 18 104 163 034 19 105 Jack Wiggins David Hamilton Novak 5492 Meadow Cir 5401 Kenilworth Dr 5421 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 034 20 106 163 035 01 107 163 035 02 108 Jeffrey Leigh Roeder George &June Ross Daniel Rocha 5431 Kenilworth Dr 5472 Kenilworth Dr 5452 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 035 03 109 163 035 04 110 163 035 05 111 Donald Keppler Jennifer Thomas Jeffrey Fohrer 5442 Kenilworth Dr 5432 Kenilworth Dr 5422 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 035 06 112 163 035 07 113 163 035 08 114 Shoy Yee Kong Priscilla Wolz Charles David Dildine 5402 Kenilworth Dr 5392 Kenilworth Dr 5382 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 035 09 115 163 035 10 116 163 035 11 117 Salvatore Coccaro William & Juliann Blake Donald Beal 5372 Kenilworth Dr 5362 Kenilworth Dr 5352 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 035 12 118 163 035 13 119 163 041 01 120 Douglas Stewart Larry Eaton Richard Boykin Jr. 5342 Kenilworth Dr 5332 Kenilworth Dr 17042 Newquist Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T /- y r w do-dod asodxa jaded al f 009LS aleldwal OAjany asn w,0965 ®���/®� QIIJ/� / ,1113 � ® Pal/ of aull 6uole puag ® f �/�L= slage-I ®laad Ase3 T U33AV-OD-008-L wx n d P 9 1 l luauasuas 3 ® O ue of a zasl i d do ao a�a �a anaa 09L5 a A2t3AV}. q 1 I.in U10�7GaAe-MMM ap ul}e aimpey el a zaildaa ap®as salad a selper f saiianNi3 163 041 02 121 163 041 03 122 163 041 04 123 John O'Brien Norman Michaud Tim Rasmussen 17052 Newquist Ln 17072 Newquist Ln 17082 Newquist Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 041 05 124 163 041 06 125 163 041 07 126 Sigrid Christa Boyer Thomas Glenn Jane Carey 17092 Newquist Ln 17102 Newquist Ln 17112 Newquist Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 041 08 127 163 041 09 128 163 041 10 129 Armen Asadourian Duane Barnes Robert Hankin 17122 Newquist Ln 17132 Newquist Ln 17142 Newquist Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 041 11 130 163 042 06 131 163 042 07 132 James Hlavaty Leonard Mingoia Morris Paliwoda 17152 Newquist Ln 17051 Newquist Ln 17071 Newquist Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 042 08 133 163 042 09 134 163 042 10 135 Paul McLeod Ryuichi &Jana Nakagawa Donald Clemens 17081 Newquist Ln 17091 Newquist Ln 17101 Newquist Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 042 11 136 163 042 18 137 163 042 19 138 Phil Urabe Richard Ernst Sr. Lisa Ann Waide 17111 Newquist Ln 17112 Greentree Ln 17102 Greentree Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 042 20 139 163 042 21 140 163 042 22 141 Ronald Lamperts Manohar Hinduja Maynard Arnold Axvig 17092 Greentree Ln 17082 Greentree Ln 17072 Greentree Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 042 23 142 163 043 01 143 163 043 02 144 Timothy Salmas Judie Diane Kaufman Helen Hawes 12823 Maxwell Dr 5242 Vineland Dr 5252 Vineland Dr Tustin CA 92782 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 043 03 145 163 043 04 146 163 043 05 147 William Hays Larry Gowing Bernard Moskowitz 5262 Vineland Dr 5282 Vineland Dr 5292 Vineland Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 043 06 148 163 043 07 149 163 043 08 150 Raymond Cook James Lis Sheila Shane 5291 Glenroy Dr 5281 Glenroy Dr 5261 Glenroy Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T / / W1a6Q3 do-dod asodxa � jaded Paaj , 09LS aleldwal OAJOAV asn wL096S oAU3AV tG/�( Q� i of awl 6uole puas v slagel ®iaad Ase3 .l2l3AtJ-09-008-1 wldn-dod paogaa al jaIana� guawa6aey� 00915 OAH3AV I!,jege°6 al zaslll}n ap suas i woavGane•nniwnn !ap w}e aany:)ey el a zai�daa i salad a sa117el saItanbli3 163 043 19 151 163 043 20 152 163 043 21 153 Joseph Coppa Matthew Huecker Ponciana Obeck 17231 Greenleaf Ln 17221 Greenleaf Ln 17211 Greenleaf Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 043 22 154 163 043 23 155 163 043 25 156 Harry & Lorraine Thielen Edward Trotz Paul Fuzzard Jr. 17191 Greenleaf Ln 17201 Greenleaf Ln 17181 Greenleaf Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16304326 157 163 043 27 158 163 043 28 159 Elma Valdes Dimiter Gulmesoff John McRee 17171 Greenleaf Ln 17151 Greenleaf Ln 5241 Glenroy Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 043 29 160 163 044 01 161 163 044 02 162 Patrick McDaniel Irmgard Bartenbach Anita Priscella Cizek 5251 Glenroy Dr 5322 Glenroy Dr 5312 Glenroy Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16304403 163 163 044 04 164 163 044 05 165 Gloria Pica Penny Martinez George Cassell 5302 Glenroy Dr 5292 Glenroy Dr 5282 Glenroy Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16304406 166 163 044 07 167 163 044 08 168 Phyllis Toombs Susan Collins-Rogers Barry Martin Spiegel 5262 Glenroy Dr 17172 Greenleaf Ln 17182 Greenleaf Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16304409 169 163 044 10 170 163 044 11 171 Buley Leonard Arsulich Dorothy Dupont 17192 Greenleaf Ln 5251 Kenilworth Dr 5261 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 044 12 172 163 044 13 173 163 044 14 174 Karin Helga Bless Donald Dodge Kuo-Liu Chang 5281 Kenilworth Dr 5291 Kenilworth Dr 5301 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 044 15 175 163 044 16 176 163 045 01 177 Leo Byrne Michel Hsiao Yu Dixie Grimmett 5311 Kenilworth Dr 5321 Kenilworth Dr 5322 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 045 02 178 163 045 03 179 163 045 04 180 Sam Nguyen Lisa Kelter Thomas Vernon Tunstall 5312 Kenilworth Dr 1610 Pacific Coast Hwy 5292 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T Wia6P3 do-dod asodxa jaded paaj 009t5 aleldwal OdaanV asn wj.0965 @)AUBA� �l { o�aug 6uo�e puss ® ���/(��— Slage t ®laad/Ise3 f luawabaeq� r sae e6 a zast 1 i AM3ntf-09-008-1 � Widn-dod paogaj a��a�anaj ap suas � ®09L5®A213At/1, q 1 I.}n worj(aane•nnnnnn ap uge,ajn43eq el a zagdag s salad a salpe}sallanba3 163 045 05 181 163 045 06 182 163 045 07 183 John Lewis III Barbara Jean Olson Daniel Dawes 5282 Kenilworth Dr 5262 Kenilworth Dr 5252 Kenilworth Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 045 08 184 163 045 09 185 163 045 10 186 Richard Patyk Jr. Robert Warden Robert Joseph Allen 5242 Kenilworth Dr 2798 Waxwing Cir 17232 Greenleaf Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Costa Mesa CA 92626 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 046 03 187 163 046 04 188 163 046 05 189 Martin Benom Julie Roberts Stratton Matinas 17051 Greentree Ln 17071 Greentree Ln 17081 Greentree Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 046 06 190 163 046 07 191 163 046 08 192 Henry Palan Mark Flores Louann Connors 17091 Greentree Ln 17101 Greentree Ln 17111 Greentree Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 051 01 193 163 051 02 194 163 051 03 195 Peter Teichmann Steven Reece Charles Jansen -5501 Wendy Cir 5511 Wendy Cir 5521 Wendy Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 051 04 196 163 051 05 197 163 051 06 198 Juergen Kahlweiss Margot Kahlweiss Joseph McAllise 5541 Wendy Cir 17361 Frans Ln 17351 Frans Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 051 07 199 163 051 08 200 163 051 09 201 Damon Bowden William Paul Theobald John Turner 17341 Apel Ln 17337 Apel Ln 17331 Apel Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 051 10 202 163 051 11 203 163 051 12 204 Michael Francis Keele Michael Beatty William Matzke 8301 La Senda Rd 17321 Apel Ln 17317 Apel Ln Alta Loma CA 91701 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 051 13 205 163 051 14 206 163 051 15 207 Lewis Holman John Daniels Robert Horvath 16432 Underhill Ln 17307 Apel Ln 17301 Apel Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 051 16 208 163 051 17 209 163 051 18 210 John Ferguson Peter Geister Michael Trapschuh 17297 Apel Ln 17291 Apel Ln 17281 Apel Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T / / ♦' wia6P3 do-dod asodxa jaded Nag r' p09L5 aleldwal®fjany ash wi0965 ®A$�3A� Q //� i o;auy 6uole puag ® J` slagel ®land Ase3 Y AH3AV-09-008-1. f Widn-dod paogaa al Ja!anaa ivawabae43 r 009LS @A'83AV l!iege6 al zas!l!�n i � wori(aane•nnnnnn �ap ui;e aany ap sues�ey el a zalldaa salad a saype}sa;lanb!13 163 052 01 211 163 052 02 212 163 052 03 213 Kenneth Yoshioka Gregory Weber Charles H Kam 17362 Apel Ln 17352 Apel Ln 17342 Apel Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264-9 16305204 214 163 052 05 215 163 052 06 216 Newman Brian Chamberlain Larry Richey 16312 Mandalay Cir 17332 Apel Ln 17326 Apel Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 053 08 217 163 053 09 218 163 053 10 219 Connie Burbridge H& P Nguyen Gilberto Guevara 17312 Apel Ln 5641 Tilburg Dr 5651 Tilburg Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 055 01 220 163 055 02 221 163 055 03 222 Paul Lagreek Hendrik DeMoet Richard Richards 5521 Kern Dr 5511 Kern Dr 5501 Kern Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 055 04 223 163 055 05 224 163 055 06 225 Robert Brooks Jr. Wendy Dixon Renate Belcher 5502 Kern Dr 5512 Kern Dr 5522 Kern Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 055 07 226 163 055 08 227 163 055 09 228 Jose Haro Daniel Tolentino Jr. Jesse Cummings Jr_ 5532 Kern Dr 5542 Kern Dr 5552 Kern Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 055 10 229 163 055 11 230 163 055 12 231 Richard Harold Carragher Christopher Eastes Jimmy Negrete 5562 Kern Dr 5572 Kern Dr 5582 Kern Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 055 13 232 63 055 14 233 163 101 01 234 Melanie Anne Fox CIT HUNTINGTON H Gary Ray 5592 Kern Dr PO Box 19 17131 Berlin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hunt' each C 48 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16310102 235 16310103 236 16310104 237 Phillip Hardy Gary Twiford Virgie Jane Gabelman 17121 Berlin Ln 17111 Berlin Ln 17101 Berlin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16310105 238 163 101 06 239 163 101 07 240 Samantha Verga Chad Fehmie Rafael Llorente,'�Q,a MNQrfe Si�alfer 17091 Berlin Ln 17081 Berlin Ln 17071 Berlin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Y ! �i r Wla6p3 do-dod asodxa laded paaj r �09L5 ale!du�al®�(aany asn wi0965 ®A��/�� a of cull 6uole puaa ���/�L slagel olaad Ase3 T AUMV-09-008-t Y widn-dod paogaJ al Jali?Aaa juawabaega r @0915 @A2t3AV jpege6 ai zasion ap suas E wo:°Aaane-MAW ap uge aangaeq el q zalldaa V i waled a salpel sa}lanb43 E E 163 101 08 241 163 10203 242 163 10204 243 Edward Vergilio Kimberly Cole-Weidenbach Shyu Miin 17051 Berlin Ln 17062 Berlin Ln 17072 Berlin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16310205 244 163 10206 245 163 10207 246 Kevin Via Linda McKibbin Todd Miller 17082 Berlin Ln 17092 Berlin Ln 17102 Berlin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16310208 247 163 10209 248 163 10210 249 Stanley Zone Alan Tonden Robert Brimer 17112 Berlin Ln 17122 Berlin Ln 17121 Friml Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16310211 250 16310212 251 16310213 252 Brian Strohecker Herbert Hopf Rachael Berge 17111 Friml Ln 17101 Friml Ln 17091 Friml Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16310214 253 16310215 254 16310216 255 Terry Cooper Yoneko lge John David Delmonico 17081 Friml Ln 17071 Friml Ln 17061 Friml Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16310305 256 163 10306 257 163 10307 258 Lucille Renzo Matthew Harbour Sharon Erickson 17082 Friml Ln 17092 Friml Ln 16872 Pacific Coast Hwy #20S Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 103 08 259 163 103 09 260 163 10310 261 Rene Hoffman Michael Flory Michael Hennessy 17112 Friml Ln 17122 Friml Ln 16217 Chella Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hacienda Heights CA 91745 16310311 262 163 103 12 263 16310313 264 Thomas Clark Martin Engquist Donald Galioro 17111 Twain Ln 17101 Twain Ln 17091 Twain Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16310414 265 163 104 15 266 163 111 01 267 A W Chapman Steven Schock John Spaulding 17112 Twain Ln 17122 Twain Ln 17161 Berlin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 111 02 268 16311103 269 16311104 270 George Molvin Tamra Kaplan Frank Frederick Said 17171 Berlin Ln 17181 Berlin Ln 17191 Berlin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 y f //� r wla6R3 do-dod asodxa ® jaded paa3 r 009LS a}eldwal @/UaAV asg wi096S 0AU3AV S KJ /1( v� i 01 awl 6uole puag V i�` /�'� slage91 Olaad Ase3 A2l3At/-09-008-L w,.dn-dOd paogaa al aalanaa ivawabaeq-3 I 009LS®A2l3AV i!aege6 al zes!l!in wordiane•nnnnnn ap uge aang3eq el a zalldaa ap®a5 i salad a salpe l sallanb113 163 111 05 271 163 111 06 272 16311107 273 Rosemary Wharton Andrew Edwards Phillip &Kelly Hewitt 17201 Berlin Ln 17221 Berlin Ln 17231 Berlin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264 9 163 111 08 274 163 11201 275 163 112 02 276 Neil Wagner Danny Wood Michael &Ana Youngsmar�? 17241 Berlin Ln 17132 Berlin Ln 17152 Berlin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 11203 277 163 11204 278 163 11205 279 Tiffany Nigro Andrew Anderson BERLIN LANE LLC 17162 Berlin Ln 17172 Berlin Ln 172 Reposado Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 La Habra Heights CA 90631 163 11206 280 163 112 07 281 163 11208 282 Michael Castellano Christopher Alan Roberts Donna Kuehne 17192 Berlin Ln 17212 Berlin Ln 17222 Berlin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 11209 283 163 112 10 284 163 11211 285 William & Lori Bickford Rosa Haro Edmund Cunningham 17232 Berlin Ln 17252 Berlin Ln 17241 Friml Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16311212 286 16311213 287 16311214 288 Richard Carter Edward Gmerek Abel Vieira 17221 Friml Ln 22521 Shake Ridge Rd 17191 Friml Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Volcano CA 95689 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 112 15 289 163 112 16 290 16311217 291 Jan Danita Lyle HAPPY VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC Howard Hitchcock 111 Rancho Del Sol 7 Brynwood Ln 17161 Friml Ln Camino CA 95709 Ladera Ranch CA 92694 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 112 18 292 163 11219 293 163 11301 294 James Reyes Richard Palmer Joseph Ping 17151 Friml Ln 17131 Friml Ln 17132 Friml Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 113 02 295 163 11303 296 163 113 04 297 James Alexanian Ronald Allen Shapiro Nelda Howell 17152 Friml Ln 17162 Friml Ln 17172 Friml Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 113 05 298 163 113 06 299 163 11307 300 Christian Larsen PTARMIGAN INVESTS INC Michael Roberts 17182 Friml Ln 5267 Warner Ave#332 17212 Friml Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T � r wia6P3 do-dod asodxa ® jaded Nag r 009LS aleldwal®Aaand asn wi0965 OAU3^%f 11�// /D i 01 auil 6u01e pua8 son= V is/ stage l ®laad Ase3 T A213AV-09-008-L 1 w,dn-dOd pjogaj al jal,?Aaj ivaWabjeg: 1 p09Ls ®,kH3AV I!jege6 al zas!llin a ul a ajn �e e e zal da ap sues wo3-Ajane*Ar%A& n ; P 4 N I _ 1 a jalad a sap�e}sa��anblz3 16311308 301 163 11309 302 163 113 10 303 Akira Yatsu Ronald Hunt Martha Chick 17222 Friml Ln 17211 Twain Ln 17201 Twain Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16311311 304 163 113 12 305 163 113 13 306 Robert Lachman Edward Walters Wayne Berge 17181 Twain Ln 17171 Twain Ln 17161 Twain Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 113 14 307 163 113 15 308 163 11401 309 David Mosqueda Robert Villanueva Michael Ward 17151 Twain Ln 17131 Twain Ln 17132 Twain Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 11402 310 163 114 03 311 163 114 04 312 Lawrence Plank Jr. Jai Jhu James Meehan 17152 Twain Ln 17162 Twain Ln 17172 Twain Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16311405 313 163 11406 314 163 11407 315 Ian Adam Ellen Jacobs Russell Buccola 5631 Kern Dr 5641 Kern Dr 5651 Kern Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 11408 316 163 11409 317 163 11410 318 Alan Wendell William Danz Allen Blodgett 5661 Kern Dr 17151 Tiffany Cir 17141 Tiffany Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 116 04 319 163 11605 320 163 11606 321 John Gontarz Mark Samples Donald Winter 5652 Kern Dr 20582 Montauk Cir 5632 Kern Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92649 '163 116 07 322 163 11608 323 163 11609 324 Elizabeth Trang Harrison Doan Charles Acocello PO Box 2552 5612 Kern Dr 5602 Kern Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16312121 325 163 121 22 326 � k 163 121 23 327 Margaret Yerema I Ratsiu &Veronica Emil C/O (ati('(V4�(n To Independence Pathways 5100 Dunbar Ave 5152 Dunbar Ave#A PO Box 43 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Los Alamitos CA 90720 163 121 24 328 Is S},p4u, ( awns 163 121 25 329 163 121 26 330 ROCKY BEACH PROPERTIES Vernon Canada Ching Chung Weng 70400 Kinikin Rd 5091 Dunbar Ave#E 16402 Hobart Ln Montrose CO 81401 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 a6P3 dn-dod asodxa jaded pa03 _ 009Ls aleldwaL @AjaAV asn w,.096s � ' 1 I' wi of aull 6uole puag ® it 1��1�11 slags I ®laad Ase3 Ti AHMV-OD-008-L ,,dn-dod pjogaj 00 Jalanaj luawabaeq� r 909LS @,kH3AV 1paege'6 al zasplpin ap sues i W0:)-Aaane•nnnnnn i ap ui;e aanq�eq el a zaildab i jelad a saipe'f sailanbp13 16312127 331 163 121 28 332 163 121 29 333 Ronald Allen Sylvia Sahagian Esther Hsu 6003 Arbor Rd 5041 Dunbar Ave 876 Via Del Monte Lakewood CA 90713 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Palos Verdes Estates CA 90274 16312131 334 163 121 48 335 16312149 336 Nasser Zeighami Martin Edwards Tommy Nakachi 12466 Turner PI 3917 Aruba Cir 19395 Macgregor Cir Tustin CA 92782 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92648 163 121 50 337 163 12204 338 �d 6-ea`-.2 e 163 12206 339 Franklin Buccella MANZONIANO GROUP LLC \,.)a,,q Lory Larson 3541 Courtside Cir 502 Park Ave#11 H 5 3761 Nimble Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 New York NY 10022 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 122 07 340 163 12208 341 163 12209 342 Franklin Buccella r:1Cou cella Surendra Shah 3541 Courtside Cir 35 e 1 12727 Nottingham St Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hugton Beach CA 9264 Cerritos CA 90703 16312210 343 16312211 344 16312212 345 Ben Li Fran ' ccella Anthony Bartoli 8072 Graziadio Dr#1 3541 Court ' 5200 Warner Ave#209 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Hunt' on Beach CA 9264 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 12301 346 163 12302 347 163 123 03 348 Warren Ziebarth Xuan Mai Thi Nguyen Enza Cianfanelli 17082 Bolsa Chica St 16761 Tim Ln 17122 Bolsa Chica St Huntington Beach CA 92649 Van Nuys CA 91406 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 12304 349 163 12305 350 163 12306 351 James Robert Dawson James &Yue-Ching Tsai Rubin Nichols 17071 Bolero Ln PO Box 9947 5726 E Rocking Horse Way Huntington Beach CA 92649 Fountain Valley CA 92728 Orange CA 92869 163 12307 352 1 3 123 08 353 163 12309 354 ALLISON PROP P Es Hsu David Blakeman Bishop 6264 Via Canada 876 Via De 5267 Warner Ave Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 Palos es Estates 74 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 123 10 355 C/o 16312311 356 16312313 357 HATFIELD INVESTMENT INC ES der DUNBAR APTS LLC Robert Hancock 876 Via Del Monte PO Box 130249 5166 Dunbar Ave Palos Verdes Estates CA 90274 Carlsbad CA 92013 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 123 14 358 16312315 359 16312318 360 Farouk Al-Mussawir Milton Jelinowicz Emil Ratsiu 56 Battery Ave 3911 Sunflower St 5122 Dunbar Ave Brooklyn NY 11228 Seal Beach CA 90740 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T g r Wla6P3 do-dod asodxa .� jaded peal � 009LS aleldwal OAAany asn wi0965 ®jIYJ$3/®� 01 auil 6uole puag '�,W' 'i =, slage-1 olaad Rse3 f f WaWabaeg3 r lae a fi a zasl 1 A2l3AV-09-008-4 i W,dO-dod p�ogaa al�a��naa ap suas @09LS®AH3AV 3 9 I I in wori(aane•nnnnnn ap ul�e aang3eq el a zalldas ® i salad a salpe}sallanb143 163 123 19 361 163 12320 362 163 12321 363 James Talley Emil Ratsiu Emil Ratsiu 2202 Pacific Coast Hwy 5132 Dunbar Ave #A 5142 Dunbar Ave Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16312322 364 163 131 11 365 163 131 12 366 Emil Ratsiu Tommy Nakachi Lory Eugene Larson 5152 Dunbar Ave#A 19395 Macgregor Cir 3761 Nimble Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16313113 367 163 131 14 368 163 131 15 369 Franklin Buccella Lory Larson Franklin Buccella 3541 Courtside Cir 3761 Nimble Cir 3541 Courtside Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163131 16 370 163 131 17 371 16313118 372 L %' o>n on Richard Ciancone Howard Stein 376 17172 Harbor Bluffs Cir 3541 Sagamore Dr Hu Beach CA 92 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163131 19 373 163 131 20 374 16313121 375 Byron Bishop Franklin Buccella Herbert Swanigan 25416 Boone PI 3541 Courtside Cir 17132 Harbor Bluffs Cir Laguna Hills CA 92653 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 131 22 376 163 131 24 377 163 131 26 378`h Vcuu e Hilary H Chan ALTIC PROP LLC c(, /{/p� Cfen,/eneh CABO DEL MAR HOMEOWNERS 9842 Kings Canyon Dr 4639 Tremont Ln 1176 Main St Huntington Beach CA 92646 Corona Del Mar CA 92625 Irvine CA 92614 163 131 27 9 163 141 02 380 16314103 381 CABO M O OWNERS SCHOOL OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL AN YIEW 117 ain 7972 Warner Ave 797 arner ! e C 261 Huntington Beach CA 92647 tingto each 92647 1631410 82 163 141 09 383 163 141 10 384 CITY HU lNGT EACH Karen Deffner Hilda Pope P ox 5921 Kenbrook Dr 17451 Valeworth Cir u not in n Bea CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 141 11 385 163 141 12 386 163 141 13 387 James McNeill Tod Minato John Scandura Sr. 17471 Valeworth Cir 17481 Valeworth Cir 17492 Valeworth Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 141 14 388 163 141 15 389 163 141 16 390 Milton Nelson Henry Toshiyuki Urada R Dufresne 17482 Valeworth Cir 17472 Valeworth Cir 17452 Valeworth Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T J Wla6P3 d�-dod asodxa ® jaded paaj ®09L5 a;elduaal @�(aany as() wi0965 ®����� ® �l o�aui�6uole puce ® 1;� 106L slage3 olaad Rse3 T AM3AV-09-008-L w,dn-dod pjogaj al jalanaj ivaWabae143 T ®09LS @AM3AV i!aege 6 al zas!I!}n ap suas woriGane-AWAn ap ul;e ajny:)eg el a zaydam salad a sal!:)e1 saj;anbii� I I 163141 17 391 163 141 18 392 163 141 19 393 Gregory Cruz Jennifer Leonard Angelina Nordell 17442 Valeworth Cir 17441 Frans Ln 17451 Frans Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 141 20 394 163 141 21 395 163 14201 396 Neil Richey David Murray Robert Pinkstaff 17471 Frans Ln 17481 Frans Ln 5502 Wendy Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 142 02 397 163 14203 398 163 14204 399 John Redl George Border Sandra Childs 5522 Wendy Cir 5532 Wendy Cir 5542 Wendy Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16314205 400 163 142 06 401 163 14207 402 Branden Eisen Philip Treviso Debra Squicciarini 5552 Wendy Cir 5551 Glenstone Dr 5541 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16314208 403 163 142 09 404 163 14210 405 William Leonard Floyd Lory Larson Donald Cohen 16701 Greenview Ln 3761 Nimble Cir 5501 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16314901 406 163 181 01 407 163 18102 408 SIGNAL COMPANIES INC Stanley Chandler Scott Barger 4343 Von Karman Ave 4041 Warner Ave PO Box 2075 Newport Beach CA 92660 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 163 181 03 409 163 181 04 410 163 18201 411 Jing Shiang Wey Christopher& Brenda Sthilaire Wendell Sparks 5531 Mossvale Cir 5541 Mossvale Cir 5502 Mossvale Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 191 01 412 163 191 02 413 16319103 414 Hans Dorflinger Gary Frank Winters Charles Emde 17422 Hillgate Ln 17412 Hillgate Ln 17402 Hillgate Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16319104 415 163 191 05 416 16319106 417 Akihiko Ohshima Rodney Blue Terry Evans 17401 Hillgate Ln 17421 Hillgate Ln 5421 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16319107 418 163 191 08 419 16319109 420 Kenneth Feldman Michael D'Antonio Joyce T Lim-Steele 5411 Glenstone Dr 5401 Glenstone Dr 2151 Haller St Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 San Diego CA 92104 Twj0965 a I I �hC, w�a6P3 do-dod asodxa ® jaded Pal 0 9LS ajeldwal OAAanV asn OAU3A V ® 111 v+ i of awl 6uole pua8 V i��S/ �L slage-I Ulaad itse3 AN3AV-OD-008-L Wldn-dod plogaa al aalanaa luawadaey� r 009LS OA113AV i!aege•6 at zasip n i worA.iane•nnnnnn �ap u!}e aany�ey el a zag ap sua5 da8 salad a salpe}saalanb!l3 163191 10 421 163191 11 422 163191 12 423 Albert Arthur Amendola Keith Jackson John Wiedrick 5381 Glenstone Dr 5361 Glenstone Dr 5351 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163191 13 424 163191 14 425 163 191 15 426 Curtis Black Jr. TULLIO FAMILY LTD PTNRSHP Arthur Donaher 5341 Glenstone Dr 5331 Glenstone Dr 5321 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 191 16 427 16319117 428 163 191 18 429 Ronald Marks Stanley Harris Noeline Khaw 6752 Derby Cir 5301 Glenstone Dr 98-1066 Palula Way Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Aiea HI 96701 163 191 19 430 16319120 431 16319121 432 Alex Hand Daniel Kittredge Douglas Wischmeyer 5322 Glenstone Dr 5332 Glenstone Dr 5342 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16319122 433 16319123 434 163 191 24 435 Jerry Wolff Kristy Knox Dan Doyle 5352 Glenstone Dr 5362 Glenstone Dr 5382 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16319125 436 163 191 26 437 16319127 438 Donald Cotton William Bowden Martin Morris 17481 Bellport Cir 17491 Bellport Cir 17492 Bellport Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16319128 439 163 191 29 440 163 191 30 441 Kay Kitsuta Alfredo Santana Jolene Chavira 17482 Bellport Cir 17472 Bellport Cir 5412 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 191 31 442 163 191 32 443 163 191 33 444 Robert Schwarte Ronald Cornelsen Mark David Bixby 5422 Glenstone Dr 17441 Hillgate Ln 17451 Hillgate Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16319134 445 163 191 35 446 163 191 36 447 Rose Marie Miller Ross Potter Ronald Dawson 17471 Hillgate Ln 17481 Hillgate Ln 17492 Hillgate Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16319137 448 163 191 38 449 16319139 450 Louis Flynn Dennis Clarke Ronald Candipan 17482 Hillgate Ln 17472 Hillgate Ln 17452 Hillgate Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T g ��I ' r WLa6P3 dn-dod asodxa ® jaded Pal 009LS a1eldwal OAAOAV ash w i ® 096S AU3A W i of auil 6uole puae i �� � slagel eiaad Ase3 T A83AV-OD-008-L Y widn-dod paogaa al aalana ap sua5 a ;uawaaaey� i @09LS @),kb3AV;!aege'6 al zas!I!in wor�(aane-nnnnnn �ap u!}e aanypey el a zalldag aalad a sal!,e'j sa;;anb!;g 163 191 40 451 163 19901 452 163 251 01 453 Leonard Munari SIGNAL PA S IN James Mishimoto 17442 Hillgate Ln 4343 n K an 17611 Rainglen Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 por ea 92660 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 251 02 454 163 251 03 455 163 251 04 456 Randall Tossey Hanh Pham Rodney Shook 17615 Rainglen Ln 17621 Rainglen Ln 17601 Rainglen Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 251 05 457 163 252 01 458 163 252 02 459 Christopher Toland Allen Carter James Madonia 17591 Rainglen Ln 17602 Rainglen Ln 17612 Rainglen Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 03 460 163 252 04 461 163 252 05 462 Lindquist Smith David Point 17591 Crown Cir 520 Ocean Ave 17571 Crown Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Seal Beach CA 90740 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 06 463 163 252 07 464 163 252 08 465 John Naimo Eric Berg Michael Robinson 17561 Crown Cir 17541 Crown Cir 17531 Crown Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 09 466 163 252 10 467 163 252 11 468 Ben Lopez Steven Bruce Jacobson Gerald Reynolds 17562 Rainglen Ln 17572 Rainglen Ln 17592 Rainglen Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 12 469 163 252 13 470 163 252 14 471 Timothy Rand Cary Johnston Shing-Ching Richard Chan 17502 Tuscan Cir 17512 Tuscan Cir 17522 Tuscan Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 15 472 163 252 16 473 163 252 17 474 Scott Yukio Nishisaka Dominique Morel Ronald Malmquist 17521 Rainglen Ln 17511 Rainglen Ln 17501 Rainglen Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 18 475 163 252 19 476 163 252 20 477 Ralph Lucas Lawrence O'Toole Brian Vardiman 17522 Rainglen Ln 17532 Rainglen Ln 17542 Rainglen Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 21 478 163 252 22 479 163 252 23 480 James Moroney Gerald Halstead Norman Feirstein 17552 Rainglen Ln 17521 Crown Cir 17511 Crown Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T i a6p3 do-dOd asodxa ® jaded paaj r , ®09L5 aleldwal OAJanV ash W10965 R2 ��� wiof aull 6uole puag V slage-! (,),laad Ase3 Y Aa3AV-09-009-L f w,dn-dod paogaj al Jalanaj luawaWeLp f ®09LS®AI13AV Ipege•6 al zaslllln ap sums i wo�•j(aane•AAAW i ap uge aing3eq el a zaildaa aalad a saline}sauanbl13 16325224 481 163 252 25 482 163 252 26 483 Eric& Laura Goodwin Fred Humphrey Virginia Rowlette 17501 Crown Cir 17512 Crown Cir 17522 Crown Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16325227 484 163 252 28 485 163 252 29 486 Robert Seidler Kathryn O'Steen Michael Enright 17532 Crown Cir 17542 Crown Cir 17562 Crown Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264-9 163 252 30 487 16325231 488 163 252 32 489 Rose Phil Francis Dubich John Iacono 5391 Barwood Dr 5411 Barwood Dr 5421 Barwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 33 490 163 252 34 491 163 252 35 492 Kenneth Wolder Hans Fassnacht Thomas Brennan 16212 Piedmont Cir 17541 Putney Cir 17531 Putney Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 36 493 163 252 37 494 163 252 38 495 Ronald Magnuson Quang Nam Nguyen Richard Farmer 17521 Putney Cir 17511 Putney Cir 17512 Putney Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 39 496 163 252 40 497 163 252 41 498 Luke& Diana Spak Mary Rich Richard Garman 17522 Putney Cir 17532 Putney Cir 17542 Putney Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 42 499 163 252 43 500 163 252 44 501 Yasuyoshi Chikazawa Clark Gary Randall Toy 17552 Putney Cir 17652 Putney Cir 17561 Beckwall Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16325245 502 163 252 46 503 163 252 47 504 Leslie Robert O'Brien Keiran &Carolyn Ohalloran Robert Peck 17551 Beckwall Ln 17541 Beckwall Ln 17531 Beckwall Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 252 48 505 163 252 49 506 163 252 50 507 Mary Anne Nieto Robert Baker Kelly Bautista 17521 Beckwall Ln 17511 Beckwall Ln 17512 Beckwall Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16325251 508 163 252 52 509 163 252 53 510 Steele Gary Allen Westwell David Clewett 17522 Beckwall Ln 17532 Beckwall Ln 17542 Beckwall Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T' wi096S a // (+ a6P3 do-dod asodxa jaded paaJ 009LS aleldwal OAJOAV asn OAU3AW t0 ! bn� i 01 awl 6uole pua9 slagel ®land Ase3 T AH3AV-09-008-L T Wide-dod pjogaj a1 a819AW luauaauaega f @09LS®A2l3AV l!aege6 al zes!l!in ap suas worAGaAe-AAAAAA ap uile aany:)ey el a zaydaH salad a salpel saiianb!i3 163 252 54 511 163 252 60 z 512 163 252 61 513 Howsmon CITY OF H INA�792648 1=ACH CITY OF IN TO ACH 17552 Beckwall Ln PO Bob 0 d PO 190 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hur�tifigto eac Ir tin ea CA 9264 8 16325262 62 514 163 253 07 515 163 253 08 516 CITY OF TIN N CH Erwin Michael Friedson PO B 190 5292 Allstone Dr 29471 Crown Rdg ingt eac A 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Laguna Niguel CA 92677 163 253 09 517 16325901 01 8 163 259 02 519 Arthur Daedelow SIGNA OMP ES SIGNAL PANIE 5312 Allstone Dr 434 on K an e 4343 n Karm ve ; Huntington Beach CA 92649 wport eac A 92660 N port B ch CA 926 — 163 259 03 0 163 259 04 163 271 01 522 SIGNA O NIE C SIGNA M IES I Cary Tanamachi 434 o n arman e 434 on rman 5311 Fanwood Dr wp Beac A 92660 N po each 92660 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 271 02 523 163 271 03 524 163 271 04 525 Martin Cynthia Cutforth Gary Smith 5305 Fanwood Dr 5301 Fanwood Dr 5291 Fanwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 271 05 526 163 271 06 527 163 271 07 528 Danny Haramoto Jack Combest Helen Marie Eisenman 5281 Fanwood Dr 5271 Fanwood Dr 5261 Fanwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 271 08 529 163 271 09 530 163 271 10 531 STATE CA RNIA Mitchell Marosek Jeffery Klaetsch 100 owe 9100 5282 Allstone Dr 5272 Allstone Dr cram o CA 9 25 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 271 11 532 163 271 12 533 163 271 13 534 R& B J Pepper Scott Mathews Warren &Mona Caggiano 5262 Allstone Dr 5252 Allstone Dr 5242 Allstone Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 271 14 5 163 271 15 536 163 271 16 537 STATE CALI RN John Bowden Michael McAlister 100 H Ze Av 100 17561 Bates Cir PO Box 922 Sa ment CA 25 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Sunset Beach CA 90742 163 271 17 538 163 271 18 539 163 271 19 540 William Ying Stephen Moore Richard Patrick Conway 17541 Bates Cir 17531 Bates Cir 17521 Bates Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T r Wla6P3 do-dod asodxa jaded paaj r 09L5 aieldu�al Q�(aany as(1 w1096S ®�ltJ3fl�f O �� i 01 aull 6u01e puaa ® �S%b�� slage-1 ®land Ase3 T A2l3Atl-09-008-1 widn-dod pjogai al jalanaJ 3uawame4m) f 00915®A2l3AV 1pege6 al zasion ap suas i ' wo:)-Ajane•nnnnnA i ap ui;e aantpey el a zai' ' ® salad a sall�e;sal4anbi13 163 271 20 541 163 271 21 542 163 271 22 543 Lois Hoshijo Edward Juline Victor Murphy 17522 Bates Cir 17532 Bates Cir 17542 Bates Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 271 23 544 163 271 24 545 163 271 25 546 James Conti James lnabinet Joseph Janda 17552 Bates Cir 17531 Tuscan Cir 17521 Tuscan Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264 9 163 271 26 547 163 271 27 548 163 271 28 Kirk Kennedy Gregory Clifford Vntinglo6 T TO�NC 17511 Tuscan Cir 17501 Tuscan Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ac A 9264 8 163 272 01 550 163 272 02 551 163 272 03 552 Jay Slender Mary Rose Justin Brown 5302 Fanwood Dr 5292 Fanwood Dr 5282 Fanwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 272 04 553 163 272 05 554 163 272 06 555 James Gibson John Mauger Brian George White 17632 Gainsford Ln 17642 Gainsford Ln PO Box 23689 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Rochester NY 14692 163 279 02 6 163 279 03 163 279 04 558 SIGNAL C P IE C SIGNAL M IES I SIGNAL MPA S INC 4343 V K an e 4343 on man e 434 on K an New rt ach 92660 N po eac A 92660 wpo each 92660 163 281 06 559 163 281 09 560 163 281 10 561 Cambridge John Choi Jose Ramirez 17171 Bolsa Chica St 17242 Green St 17252 Green St Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 281 13 562 163 281 14 563 163 281 15 564 Christos Tsimerekis Russell Newman Ceccarelli 4911 Seapine Cir 4921 Seapine Cir 4931 Seapine Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 281 16 565 163 281 17 566 163 281 18 567 Edward Ramaekers Helen Gouin Michael Barto 4952 Seapine Cir 4942 Seapine Cir 4932 Seapine Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 281 19 568 163 281 20 569 163 281 21 570 Michael Reed Scott Wilson Si-Hyong Kim 4922 Seapine Cir 4912 Seapine Cir 4902 Seapine Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 rrr r wl 6P3 d�-dod asodxa jade aal ®0945 a;eldwal @�(aant/ash w10965 ®����� 1 1 '�� i of awl 6uole puas ® 1�S/L)L slage-1 ®laad fse3 T AN3AV-09-008-L ► wldn-dod paogaa a!lali?A ap sues W luawaoaegj 11 @09LS®Al13Ad I!aege6 al zas!yin i wori(aane-nnnnnn �ap u!}e aany�ey el a zaildaa ® � aalad a salpe}sa}}anb113 163 281 24 571 163 281 25 572 163 281 26 573 John Radle Dennis & Marilyn Oba David Johnson 4901 Los Patos Ave 4911 Los Patos Ave 4921 Los Patos Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 281 27 574 163 281 28 575 163 281 29 576 Paul Bowman Leslie Wiedemann Toni Gregory 4931 Los Patos Ave 4941 Los Patos Ave 4961 Los Patos Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 281 30 577 163 281 31 578 163 311 01 579 Douglas Ames Allen Zeroski Chong Choi 4971 Los Patos Ave 4981 Los Patos Ave 4903 Shelburne Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 311 02 580 163 311 03 581 163 311 04 582 Michael Burley Robert Jouret James Glen Yamashita 4915 Shelburne Dr 4927 Shelburne Dr 4939 Shelburne Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 311 05 583 163 311 06 584 163 311 07 585 Kusal Tan Tamara Shaw James Filipan 4953 Shelburne Dr 4965 Shelburne Dr 17280 Hampton Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 311 08 586 163 311 09 587 163 311 10 588 J A Kuttel Abilio Hernandez George Kapnas 17298 Hampton Ln 962 Heron Cir 17347 Hampton Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Seal Beach CA 90740 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 311 11 589 163 311 12 590 163 311 13 591 William Helzer Michael McAlister Maurice Aouate 17337 Hampton Ln PO Box 922 7184 Holmes Ct Huntington Beach CA 92649 Sunset Beach CA 90742 Canton MI 48187 163 311 14 592 163 311 15 593 163 311 16 594 Michael Hanbury Rho Chao Mark Schwene 17301 Hampton Ln 4930 Shelburne Dr 4918 Shelburne Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 /Landa 95 163 311 19 5 163 311 97 Landmar i I Land rk S' ai#250 4343 n r a Ave 43 Vo ar n Ave4 Ne eac CA 92660 ewp Be CA 92660 163 311 598 163 311 599 163 311 2 Landm k Si al Landm Si al Land al 434 on rmaAve 434 on arma ve 43 o ar Ave N o eac A 92660 wpo eac A 92660 wp Bea CA 92660 T a C P wia6P3 do-dod asodxa ,jaded paaj Y 009LS aLeldwal OAAaAV asn wi096s O�2J�A�� /� �D/ o;auy 6uole puce ® �� � ✓ �(j�(_ slage-I ®laad Rse3 T AUMV-09-008-1, ,,dn-dad pjogaa al jalanaa luawad.1eg3 T 009LS 6A2l3AV Wegeb ai zesimn ap suas woriGane MAW ap ui}e aang:)ey el a za!1da8 ® ± atiled a saipel saiianbi 3 16335231 691 163 352 32 692 163 352 33 693 Landmark Signal _ Landmark Sig al Landmark Sign 1 '6 Exec 4#250 --- ---- —6—Executive— 2 __-______-_..________" 6 Executive Ci #250 Irvine CA 92614 Irvine CA 926 4 Irvine-CA-9261 ----- -------- 163 352 34 694 163 352 35 695 163 352 36 696 Landmark Signal Landmark Si nal Landmark Si nal 6 Executive Cir 250 6 Executive it#250 tive it#250 Irvine CA . Irvine Irvine CA 92 14 163 35J37697 16335238 698 163352 39 699 Landm Landmark gnat Landmark S gnal6 Exec 6 Executive Cir#250 6 Executive it#250Irvine — Irvine CA 9 614 Irvine CA 9 614 163 352 40 700 163 352 4 701 16335242 702 Landmark Signal Landmark ignal Landmark Si nal 6 Executive Cir 250 6 Executi Cir#250 6 Executive it#250 Irvine 614 Irvine 2614--�---___ Irvine CA 9 614 163 352 43 703 939 541 08 704 939 541 09 705 Landmark Sign I Patricia Tensfeldt Carole Pardee 6 Executive Cir#250 5032 Dorado Dr#101 5032 Dorado Dr#102 Irvine CA 9261 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 10 706 939 541 11 707 939 541 12 708 Patricia Rankin Martin Jarolimek John Pulera 5032 Dorado Dr#103 5032 Dorado Dr#104 5032 Dorado Dr#201 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 13 709 939 541 14 710 939 541 15 711 Tracey Riverman Deborah Shubin Kyung Moh 5032 Dorado Dr#202 5032 Dorado Dr#203 5032 Dorado Dr#204 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 16 712 939 541 17 713 939 541 18 714 DOWNEY & L ASSN FA Neil Ruggiero Patricia Hegeman 3501 Jamboree Rd 5032 Dorado Dr#106 5032 Dorado Dr 9107 Newport Beach CA 92660 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 19 715 939 541 20 716 939 541 21 717 Elaine Catherine Mock Brian Cabildo Amy Annette Marrero 5300 Sunset Ln 5032 Dorado Dr#205 5032 Dorado Dr#206 Yorba Linda CA 92886 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 22 718 939 541 23 719 939 541 24 720 Elizabeth Toumajian Dorit Santos Clarissa Raposas 5032 Dorado Dr#207 18627 Brookhurst St#355 5032 Dorado Dr#109 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T I Wja6P3 do-dod asodxa � jaded paaj 09LS ajeldwal OAJanyasn w10965 ®Jl�`j��� S611 /�� 01 awl 6u01e puas ® ���% slagel vlaad Ase3 J UMV-o9-008-t f widn-dod paogaa al aajanaa WaMobae43 f ®09tS®A2t3AV W"Ieb al zaslllln ap suas i uaoriGane nnnnnn i ap u±;e ajngaeg of a zaiidaa ® i salad a sall5e4 sal}anb1i3 939 541 25 721 939 541 26 722 939 541 27 723 Blaine Lohman Jack Markovitz Craig Borkowski 6372 Braemar Dr PO Box 1604 5032 Dorado Dr#112 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Sunset Beach CA 90742 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 28 724 939 541 29 725 939 541 30 726 Peter Gover Michaela Conroy Rolland &Teresa Boceta 5032 Dorado Dr#209 5032 Dorado Dr 9210 5032 Dorado Dr 9211 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 31 727 939 541 32 728 939 541 33 729 Jeremy Mason Carlos Javier Torres Luis Berbari 5032 Dorado Dr#212 16 Calle Akelia 5031 Dorado Dr#102 Huntington Beach CA 92649 San Clemente CA 92673 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 34 730 939 541 35 731 939 541 36 732 Marc Levin Dino Caramagno Bryan Stahl 5612 E Parkcrest St 13661 Fairmont Way 5031 Dorado Dr#201 Long Beach CA 90808 Tustin CA 92780 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 37 733 939 541 38 734 939 541 39 735 Andrew Galvin Veronica Carbajal Daniel Sparks 5031 Dorado Dr#202 5031 Dorado Dr#203 5031 Dorado Dr#204 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 40 736 939 541 41 737 939 541 42 738 Dino Car agno Susan Sullivan Ricardo Garcia 1366 air Wa 5031 Dorado Dr#106 5031 Dorado Dr#107 T in C 278 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 43 739 939 541 44 740 939 541 45 741 Kenneth Ono Denny Garrison Gary Reeb 6552 Dohrn Cir 5031 Dorado Dr#205 5031 Dorado Dr#206 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 46 742 939 541 47 743 939 541 48 744 Luis Contreras T Kent Pugmire Harold &Claire Via 542 Eaker Way 5031 Dorado Dr#208 13592 Palomar St Antioch CA 94509 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Westminster CA 92683 939 541 49 745 939 541 50 746 939 541 51 747 Joseph Coghill Stacey Hunt Garth Rosenberger PO Box 316 5031 Dorado Dr#111 5031 Dorado Dr#112 Surfside CA 90743 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 52 748 939 541 53 749 939 541 54 750 (mad Aldeen Shbeeb Kristy Mutch Darryl Webb 5031 Dorado Dr#209 5031 Dorado Dr#210 6262 Pacemont Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92648 c wi ® a6p3 dn-dod asodxa waded paaj P ®091s a;elduaaZ 0AJany asn ! wL096S ®Agj��� a J /Q / i 03 awl 6u0le pua8 ® �s/ t�7 slage-1 ®laad 7ise3 T f Juawabaegp T ue e 6 a zasl � J1213At/-09-008-L � Wid(�-dod p�ogaa al�alanaa ap suas � ®0965®Jl2l3At�� g I 11f1 worAaane nnnnnn ap uge ainq�eq el a zalldaa s i salad a salpe j sallanbl13 939 541 55 751 939 541 56 752 939 541 57 753 Mark Morimoto Mary Wurzburg Brad Gnegy 5031 Dorado Dr#212 17202 Corbina Ln #202 332 Prospect St Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Newport Beach CA 92663 939 541 58 754 939 541 59 755 939 541 60 756 Frank Timan Brian Michael McMann Alicia Wickwire 526 9th St 16391 Eagle Ln 5071 Dorado Dr#201 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 61 757 939 541 62 758 939 541 63 759 Ryan & Carolyn Marcus Thomas Adams Victoria Evelyn Bouffard 620 Danube Way 5858 Engineer Dr 5071 Dorado Dr#204 Costa Mesa CA 92626 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 64 760 939 541 65 761 939 541 66 762 Matthew Dingwall Rusty Long Sheela Choudhury 21246 Alanis Cir 17241 Apel Ln 6751 Lafayette Dr Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 939 541 67 763 939 541 68 764 939 541 69 765 Michelle Conway Gregory Manack Joseph Bobshosky Sr. 5071 Dorado Dr#108 4101 Albemarle St NW#631 5071 Dorado Dr#206 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Washington DC 20016 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 70 766 939 541 71 767 939 541 72 768 Dean Shier Mary Giacchino Charlotte Pikor 5071 Dorado Dr 9207 5071 Dorado Dr#208 5071 Dorado Dr#109 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 73 769 939 541 74 770 939 541 75 771 Maureen Slattery Catherine Gabourie Susan Benon 5071 Dorado Dr#110 21551 Hanakai Ln 10 Brownsbury Rd Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Laguna Niguel CA 92677 939 541 76 772 939 541 77 773 939 541 78 774 David Wiemer Maria Elena De Imperial Angela Segal 16751 Barefoot Cir 5071 Dorado Dr#210 5071 Dorado Dr#211 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 79 775 939 541 80 776 939 541 81 777 Mark Frey Barbara Rossi Theodore Ramsdell 5071 Dorado Dr#212 17172 Abalone Ln #101 17172 Abalone Ln #102 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 82 778 939 541 83 779 939 541 84 780 Brenda Baldwin Vincent Corella Tuong Nguyen 17172 Abalone Ln #103 17172 Abalone Ln #104 17172 Abalone Ln #201 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T /_ G r Wla6p�do-dod asodxa _ jaded paaJ �0945 a�eldwal Q�(aany as[7 wi0965 ®��j��� UJ�� ' S i o;awl 6uole puaa 6MOM ® �� slage-1 ®land Ase3 T Aa3AV-09-008-L i widn-dod paogaj al jalanaj ivaWaujey:) i @09L5 )AH3AV I!jege6 al zas!l!3n ap suas i uaorAjane-MA& n i al)ul;e aany�ey el a aaydall salad a salpel sallanbl13 i 939 541 85 781 939 541 86 782 939 541 87 783 Curtis Heitkamp Jean Myers Allan Dickson Fish 17172 Abalone Ln 9202 17172 Abalone Ln #203 592 Redwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Santa Cruz CA 95060 939 541 88 784 939 541 89 785 939 541 90 786 Leslie Maddox Veronica Fallon Graham Martin 17172 Abalone Ln 4105 17172 Abalone Ln #106 17172 Abalone Ln #107 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 91 787 939 541 92 788 939 541 93 789 Marnie Ulrich Kai Kramer Gavin Calder 30590 Lake Pointe Dr 17172 Abalone Ln#205 17172 Abalone Ln #206 Menifee CA 92584 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 94 790 939 541 95 791 939 541 96 792 Mark Clark David Crow Gloria Cholota 17172 Abalone Ln #207 17172 Abalone Ln#208 17172 Abalone Ln #109 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 97 793 939 541 98 794 939 541 99 795 Robert& Christine Giles III Jan Naomi Lee Donald Cervantes 17172 Abalone Ln#110 21207 Avalon Blvd#85 550 S Palm St Huntington Beach CA 92649 Carson CA 90745 La Habra CA 90631 939 542 00 796 939 542 01 797 939 542 02 798 Harold Jackson Richard Vanesian Elmer Phibbs 15402 Maryknoll St 14014 N 16th St 16382 Oakmont Ln Westminster CA 92683 Phoenix AZ 85022 Huntington Beach CA 92647 939 542 03 799 939 542 04 800 939 542 05 801 Grace Wipperfurth Grover Wise Mary Patricia McKenna 17172 Abalone Ln#212 5146 Dorado Dr#101 16621 Channel Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 06 802 939 542 07 803 939 542 08 804 Jacqulyn Andrews Michel Larry Costner Steven Thompson 5146 Dorado Dr#103 5146 Dorado Dr#104 5146 Dorado Dr#201 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 09 805 939 542 10 806 939 542 11 807 Kevin Lester Laura Giles Jeannette Poitevin 5146 Dorado Dr#202 5146 Dorado Dr#203 5146 Dorado Dr#204 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 12 808 939 542 13 809 939 542 14 810 Charlotte Velasquez Stanley 2005-Wmc2 Morgan Cindy Metzgar 5146 Dorado Dr#105 5146 Dorado Dr 4106 5146 Dorado Dr#107 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 TO W1a6P3 do-dod asodxa jaded Paaj � GCSram 09L5 aleldwal®haany asn w10965 O AU3AW 01 aulI 6uoIe uae � slage-1®load jCse3 T AH3AV-09-008-1 ,,dn-dod pjogaa at jalanaa luaWabaeq:) T ®091S OA113AV I!aegeT at zasion ujor�(aane'nnnnnn i ap ui;e ajny�ey el a zaIt �ldaa ap suas® talad a sall:)e4 s0}}0nbti3 939 542 15 811 939 542 16 812 939 542 17 813 Michael Shaver Lisa Bondy Lisa Baker 5146 Dorado Dr#108 5146 Dorado Dr#205 5146 Dorado Dr#206 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 18 814 939 542 19 815 939 542 20 816 Robert& Helene Orear Steven Reed Jennifer Gates 5146 Dorado Dr#111 5146 Dorado Dr#208 757 Ocean Ave #117 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Santa Monica CA 90402 939 542 21 817 939 542 22 818 939 542 23 819 Raymond Shaw Robert Orear Everett Michael Sweeney 5146 Dorado Dr A110 5146 Dorado Dr#111 5146 Dorado Dr 9112 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 24 820 939 542 25 821 939 542 26 822 Mariusz Sieradzki Judy Morris John Eastman 5146 Dorado Dr#209 5146 Dorado Dr 9210 840 E 37th St Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Long Beach CA 90807 939 542 27 823 939 542 28 824 939 542 29 825 Stacey McDonald Craig Eichorn Mary Ludington 1476 Hidden Valley Rd 17151 Corbina Ln #101 9 Sanderling Ln Thousand Oaks CA 91361 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Aliso Viejo CA 92656 939 542 30 826 939 542 31 827 939 542 32 828 Colin Matsumoto Gina Caudillo Robert Cordery 17151 Corbina Ln #103 17151 Corbina Ln #104 17151 Corbina Ln #201 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 33 829 939 542 34 830 939 542 35 831 Lawrence Grote David Zagres Gwen Kuroye 17151 Corbina Ln 9202 17151 Corbina Ln #203 17151 Corbina Ln #204 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 36 832 939 542 37 833 939 542 38 834 Christopher Palmer Steven Mossman John Ayala 17151 Corbina Ln 9105 750 Loma Vista St 607 E Las Palmas Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 El Segundo CA 90245 Fullerton CA 92835 939 542 39 835 939 542 40 836 939 542 41 837 Keith Murata Conrad Wilson Athanasios Koubouras 1910 Westmoreland Dr 17151 Corbina Ln #205 17151 Corbina Ln 9206 Brea CA 92821 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 42 838 939 542 43 839 939 542 44 840 Michael Eggleson David Heath Michael Spangler 2975 Dorn Ct 17151 Corbina Ln #208 PO Box 2012 Laguna Beach CA 92651 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 T Wla6P3 do-dod asodxa jaded paa3 �p � ®0915 alelduaal OAAanV asn wi096S (@AU3 %lF O �//'�� of auy 6uole puag ® �S /DC slagel 00ad Rse3 Aa3"-OD-008-1 W,dn-dod pjogaa al aajana ap suas a luawabaey� r @09LS®A213nt1 i!aegef3 al zas!I!in uaor�(aane nnnnnn ap u!}e aany�ey e�a za.1daa ® aalad a salpe4 sa}}anb!33 939 542 45 841 939 542 46 842 939 542 47 843 Barbara Sowma Kimberly Fellers Margaret Diane Stewart 17151 Corbina Ln #110 17151 Corbina Ln 9111 17151 Corbina Ln #112 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 48 844 939 542 49 845 939 542 50 846 Jane Nourse Mary Elizabeth Orewyler Tumkur&Alaka Shivananda 17151 Corbina Ln 4209 17151 Corbina Ln #210 17151 Corbina Ln#211 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 93954251 847 939 542 52 848 939 542 53 849 Claire Maquire Linda Mason Dalsimer Rodney Pease 17151 Corbina Ln 4212 17191 Corbina Ln #101 30510 Passageway PI Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Agoura Hills CA 91301 939 542 54 850 939 542 55 851 939 542 56 852 Sherry Gentilini Georganna Janelli Devin Samaha 17191 Corbina Ln #103 17191 Corbina Ln #104 9726 Willow Glenn Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Santa Ana CA 92705 939 542 57 853 939 542 58 854 939 542 59 855 John Kremer Alan Scherf Robert Chang 711 Alabama St 17191 Corbina Ln #203 4682 Warner Ave#C216 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 60 856 939 542 61 857 939 542 62 858 Armen Asadourian John Nelson Ryan Gates 17191 Corbina Ln #105 420 Nogal 17191 Corbina Ln #107 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Lompoc CA 93436 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 63 859 939 542 64 860 939 542 65 861 Michelle Tan Yvette Helen Palinkas Julio Trinidad 2413 Rockefeller Ln#B 17191 Corbina Ln #205 17191 Corbina Ln#206 Redondo Beach CA 90278 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 66 862 939 542 67 863 939 542 68 864 Tricia Ann Saul GOLDEN PAULA Elaine Mock 555 S Shoal Creek St 17191 Corbina Ln #208 5300 Sunset Ln Banning CA 92220 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Yorba Linda CA 92886 939 542 69 865 939 542 70 866 939 542 71 867 Henry III LaTempa Lewis Archer Patrick Reynolds 6672 Jardines Dr 7371 E Woodsboro Ave 910 Turtle Crest Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Anaheim CA 92807 Irvine CA 92603 939 542 72 868 939 542 73 869 939 542 74 870 Stanley Vielma II Clifford Richards Donna Dozier 17191 Corbina Ln #209 17191 Corbina Ln #210 16458 Bolsa Chica St#418 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 / ( W,abR3 do-dod asodxa jaded paai f' ®091S ale!dwal @AAaAV asn wi0965 ®�$�3d�� (pl ��� of awl 6uo�e puag ® f} ��5/✓fir= stage3 plaad /Cse3 11UMV-09-009-1, ,,dn-dod pjogai al jalaAe ap sues A luawabaey� T @09LS oAH3AV i!iege6 al zesion wori(iane nnnnnn ap ul;e aany�ey el a zalldall V salad a sal!�e4 sallanb113 939 542 75 871 939 542 76 872 939 542 77 873 Roger Wayne Powell Matthew Kiemle Cynthia Annette Girard 21179 Via Noriega 5101 Tortuga Dr#101 5101 Tortuga Dr#102 Yorba Linda CA 92887 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264J 939 542 78 874 939 542 79 875 939 542 80 876 Jenna Paulitschek Christine Stempleski J David Jostak 5101 Tortuga Dr 4103 5101 Tortuga Dr 4104 5101 Tortuga Dr#201 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 81 877 939 542 82 878 939 542 83 879 Ryan Redenbaugh Brian Saulson Diane Dennin 5101 Tortuga Dr#202 5101 Tortuga Dr 4203 5101 Tortuga Dr#204 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 84 880 939 542 85 881 939 542 86 882 Charles Miller Mabel Shih Henry Uranga Jr. PO Box 760 5101 Tortuga Dr 9106 5101 Tortuga Dr#107 Sunset Beach CA 90742 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 87 883 939 542 88 884 939 542 89 885 Marton Carungay Eric Stolp Lori Leilani Paul 5101 Tortuga Dr#108 5101 Tortuga Dr#205 PO Box 507 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Kailua HI 96734 939 542 90 886 939 542 91 887 939 542 92 888 Janice Elaine Botzbach John Carnahan James Utegg 5101 Tortuga Dr#207 16294 Janine Dr 5101 Tortuga Dr#109 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Whittier CA 90603 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 93 889 939 542 94 890 939 542 95 891 Kelley Bruemmer Sinh Du James Vernon III 373 Playa Blanca 5101 Tortuga Dr#111 5101 Tortuga Dr#112 Encinitas CA 92024 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 96 892 939 542 97 893 939 542 98 894 Kristine Arnold Michael Morgan Patricia Arnstad 5101 Tortuga Dr#209 5101 Tortuga Dr#210 5101 Tortuga Dr#211 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 99 895 939 543 00 896 939 543 01 897 Reginaldo Aleman Carol Philipp Alma Balli 5101 Tortuga Dr#212 5145 Tortuga Dr 9101 5145 Tortuga Dr#102 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 02 898 939 543 03 899 939 543 04 900 Betty Lu Bridge Bergeron-Williams David Buttson 5145 Tortuga Dr#103 5145 Tortuga Dr 9104 5145 Tortuga Dr 9201 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 TJ_ I j f Wjalpg do-dod asodxa jaded paaj p09Ls aleldwal OAJaAV asn wi096S ®����� (� r ( � i ®of auil 6uole puaa V ���� slagel ®laad Ase3 T AMAV-09-008-1 ,N,,dn-dod paogaa al Aalana.l luawabaeLp f 0091S 0A83AV llaege 6 al zasimn I wo3-AjaAe-AAmm i ap uile aany:)eg el a zagdaa ap sua5 salad a salhel sallanbiq I I 93954305 901 939 543 06 902 939 543 07 903 Jo Anne Alstrand Archie Komae David Baker 5145 Tortuga Dr#202 45-303 Puuloko PI 2105 Alabama St Huntington Beach CA 92649 Kaneohe HI 96744 Huntington Beach CA 92648 939 543 08 904 939 543 09 905 939 543 10 906 Carl Beach Jelena Radovic Richard & Barbara Nash 5145 Tortuga Dr#105 5145 Tortuga Dr#106 1 Malibu Ct Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Merced CA 95341 939 543 11 907 939 543 12 908 939 543 13 909 Bruce Allen Pouder Molly Bounds Jeanne Romano 5145 Tortuga Dr#108 5145 Tortuga Dr#205 5145 Tortuga Dr#206 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 14 910 939 543 15 911 939 543 16 912 Colleen Congelliere Norma Morales George Renteria 5145 Tortuga Dr#207 16497 Tropez Ln 816 Hollowbrook Ct Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 San Marcos CA 92078 939 543 17 913 939 543 18 914 939 543 19 915 Christa Gemehl Camelia Valencia Norman Kenji Suzuki 440 Davis Ct#802 5145 Tortuga Dr#111 5145 Tortuga Dr#112 San Francisco CA 94111 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 20 916 939 543 21 917 939 543 22 918 Victoria Poure' Dave Bickelhaupt Larry Friedlander 5145 Tortuga Dr#209 5145 Tortuga Dr#210 5145 Tortuga Dr#211 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 23 919 939 543 24 920 939 543 25 921 Robert Rice Allan Pollock Paulette Dewire 5145 Tortuga Dr 9212 3161 Elliot St NW 17202 Corbina Ln#102 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Salem OR 97304 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 26 922 939 543 27 923 939 543 28 924 Linda Curoso Lori Felling Wayne Elus 17202 Corbina Ln #103 17202 Corbina Ln #104 17202 Corbina Ln 9201 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 29 925 939 543 30 926 939 543 31 927 Mary Wurzburg Timothy Lee Campbell Steven Nakamoto 17202 Corbina Ln 9202 17202 Corbina Ln #203 17202 Corbina Ln #204 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 32 928 939 543 33 929 939 543 34 930 Daniel Nelson Kathleen Ann Gentry Patrick Hegarty 17202 Corbina Ln #105 17202 Corbina Ln #106 368 Harvard Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Arcadia CA 91007 /0? 1 Wla6P3 do-dod asodxa jaded paaj � @09LS aleldwal O�(aaAV asn wi0965 ®AU3AV 1�// of awl 6uole puae V i �5 S/ JC slage-I ®laad Rse3 T A113AV-09-008-L f Wjdn-dod pjogaj al jalanaj juaujabjeq:) f @09LS®AN3A`d I!.aege 6 al zasion � uj0ri(a8ne'&VA n ap u!}e ajng3e4 el a zaildaa ap suss su salad a salpe I sallanb!13 939 543 35 931 939 543 36 932 939 543 37 933 Colleen Moroney Crystal Whorton Robin Lynn Deemer 1314 Santiago Dr 17202 Corbina Ln #205 17202 Corbina Ln 9206 Newport Beach CA 92660 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264-9 939 543 38 934 939 543 39 935 939 543 40 936 Viktor Schreckengost Samien Nol Rickie Hulsey 17202 Corbina Ln 4207 17202 Corbina Ln #208 13342 Chestnut St Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Westminster CA 92683 939 543 41 937 939 543 42 938 939 543 43 939 Heather Morton Christopher Hliboki Jamieson Hopkins 17202 Corbina Ln 9110 16 Wescott St 17202 Corbina Ln #112 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Old Tappan NJ 07675 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 44 940 939 543 45 941 939 543 46 942 Michael Bogert Penelope Nichols Margaret Riley 17202 Corbina Ln #209 17202 Corbina Ln #210 17202 Corbina Ln #211 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 47 943 939 543 48 944 939 543 49 945 Richard Skramstad Ward Cannon Eric Medel 21706 Talisman St 5176 Tortuga Dr#101 5176 Tortuga Dr 9102 Torrance CA 90503 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 50 946 939 543 51 947 939 543 52 948 Robert Zingg Harold Towers Jr. William Michael Verna 5176 Tortuga Dr#103 43104 W Sunland Dr 28012 Paseo Rincon Huntington Beach CA 92649 Maricopa AZ 85238 Mission Viejo CA 92692 939 543 53 949 939 543 54 950 939 543 55 951 Scott Runge Linas Raslavicius Lindsay Tullis 5176 Tortuga Dr#202 5176 Tortuga Dr#203 5176 Tortuga Dr#204 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 56 952 939 543 57 953 939 543 58 954 Joshua Littlejohn Charles Miller Gilberto Valdez 424 Grey Feather Ct PO Box 760 507 13th St Round Rock TX 78665 Sunset Beach CA 90742 Huntington Beach CA 92648 939 543 59 955 939 543 60 956 939 543 61 957 Daniel Estrada Polina Grace Francisco Larrea 5176 Tortuga Dr 9108 5176 Tortuga Dr#205 9048 Buttercup Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Fountain Valley CA 92708 939 543 62 958 939 543 63 959 939 543 64 960 Michael Hall Shuping Chen Robert Waligurski 5176 Tortuga Dr#207 5176 Tortuga Dr#208 2113 25th St Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Anacortes WA 98221 T I' ,,a6p3 do-dod asodxa jaded paa3 f ®09L5 aleldwal®Ajany asg e w1096S ®AU3A%f 1U /� /�� 01 au!l 6uo!e puae Y i ���S/( slagel ®laud Ase3 T ( luawa6aeq� r iae e a zaso i AM3AV-O9-008-1 , W,dn-dod paogaa al jalanaa , @09LS OA1J3AV q 1 I In ap sua5 � wor nn Aaane• annn ap ul;e a1ng3eq el a zalldaa salad a salhe4 sal;anbl13 93954365 961 939 543 66 962 939 543 67 963 Danny Maruki Diane Schug Anderson Darren Stewardson 5176 Tortuga Dr 4110 5176 Tortuga Dr#111 5176 Tortuga Dr#112 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264J 939 543 68 964 939 543 69 965 939 543 70 966 Craig Branson Denver Gearhart III Michele Levitt 5176 Tortuga Dr#209 5176 Tortuga Dr#210 5176 Tortuga Dr#211 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264J 939 543 71 967 939 543 72 968 939 543 73 969 Lisa Carmen Laura Maclachlan Michael David Handler 5176 Tortuga Dr 4212 5096 Tortuga Dr#101 5096 Tortuga Dr#102 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 74 970 939 543 75 971 939 543 76 972 Brady Kooiman Carla Sgroi Francisca Kim 5096 Tortuga Dr 9103 5096 Tortuga Dr#104 5096 Tortuga Dr#201 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 77 973 939 543 78 974 939 543 79 975 Norman Sands Ann Patrice Dewey Lloyd Sorensen 5096 Tortuga Dr#202 5096 Tortuga Dr#203 644 Hillside Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Solvang CA 93463 939 543 80 976 939 543 81 977 939 543 82 978 Lauren McGirr Gary Trudeau Patricia Taylor 5096 Tortuga Dr#105 5096 Tortuga Dr#106 5096 Tortuga Dr#107 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 83 979 939 543 84 980 939 543 85 981 Don Paden Monica Malhotra Lilian Broadway 5096 Tortuga Dr#108 5096 Tortuga Dr#205 5096 Tortuga Dr#206 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 86 982 939 543 87 983 939 543 88 984 Sharon Vera William Solan Salvatore Grasso 5096 Tortuga Dr#207 5093 Tortuga Dr#208 5096 Tortuga Dr#109 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 543 89 985 939 543 90 986 939 543 91 987 Gary Heinrichs Gary Mooney Laura Ghilarducci 5096 Tortuga Dr#110 6711 Shetland Cir 3201 La Cresta Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Bakersfield CA 93305 939 543 92 988 939 543 93 989 939 543 94 990 Diron Lai Wendy Beetler Michael Lester 5096 Tortuga Dr#209 5096 Tortuga Dr#210 334 Carroll Park E Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Long Beach CA 90814 o / // W,a6p3 do-dod asodxa jaded paaj 0091S a;eldwal OAJaAV asp w OA?����1096S a (� of awl 6uole puae ® /��%(�t slage-t Olaad Ase3 T AUMV-OD-008-L f H,,dn-dod pjogaj al japna ap sua$j luawab.aeg3 r a 09LS a O AIIIAd l!aege 6 al zasipn � wo3•A.iane•nnnnnn ap u!;e ajnq�eq el a za!ldaa Su , jalad a saP:)e4 sallanbilg 939 543 95 991 Christine Overstreet 5096 Tortuga Dr#212 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T', wi0965 ®A?J3Aty ® F wia6P3 do-dod asodxa jaded paai 009LS aleldwal OAAany asn of au!)6uole puaq slage-I ®laad Aseg T AHMV-09-008-t 11 widn-dod paogaa a!Ja!anaa luaWabaey:) r 0091S®,kH3A`d I!aege 6 al zas►l!;n wri(oaane nnnnnn ap ul;e aanyaey el a zaildaa ap sua5 i salad a sal!�el sad}anb13 163 032 14 163 032 16 163 032 18 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17101 Saint Andrews Ln 17121 Saint Andrews Ln 17141 Saint Andrews Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163.034 12 163 034 17 163 042 23 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5341 Kenilworth Dr 5391 Kenilworth Dr 17052 Greentree Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 045 03 163 045 09 163 051 10 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5302 Kenilworth Dr 17222 Greenleaf Ln 17327 Apel Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 051 13 163 051 16 163 052 04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17311 Apel Ln 17297 Apel Ln 17336 Apel Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 10307 163 103 10 163 11205 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17102 Friml Ln 17121 Twain Ln 17182 Berlin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 112 13 163 112 15 163 11216 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17211 Friml Ln 17181 Friml Ln 17171 Friml Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 113 06 163 11605 163 11607 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17192 Friml Ln 5642 Kern Dr 5622 Kern Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 121 21 163 121 22 163 121 23 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5131 Dunbar Ave 5121 Dunbar Ave 5111 Dunbar Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 121 24 163 121 26 163 12127 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5101 Dunbar Ave 5071 Dunbar Ave 5051 Dunbar Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 121 29 163 121 31 163 121 48 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5021 Dunbar Ave 17062 Bolsa Chica St 5151 Dunbar Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 / f wLa6p3 do-dod asodxa ® jaded paaA { p0915 a;eldwaj®�(aand asn wi0965 ®���A� of auy 6uole pua9 ® S// slags l ®load lse3 P AUMV-OD-008-L Y N,idn-dod paogaa al aalanaa luawaaaega � ®09 LS @AM3AV WeV 6 al zaswin � worAaane-MAA n ap ui}e ajmpey el a zaildaa ap sua5 Su i salad a salhe}sal anbl}3 163 121 49 163 121 50 163 12204 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17061 Leslie Ln 17081 Leslie Ln 17062 Harbor Bluffs Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16312206 163 122 07 163 12208 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17062 Leslie Ln 17082 Leslie Ln 17072 Harbor Bluffs Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16312209 163 122 10 163 122 11 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17082 Harbor Bluffs Cir 17092 Harbor Bluffs Cir 17102 Harbor Bluffs Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 123 02 163 123 04 163 12305 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17112 Bolsa Chica St 5032 Dunbar Ave 5042 Dunbar Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 123 06 163 123 07 163 12308 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5052 Dunbar Ave 5062 Dunbar Ave 5072 Dunbar Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16312309 163 123 10 163 123 11 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5082 Dunbar Ave 5092 Dunbar Ave 5102 Dunbar Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 123 14 163 12315 163 12319 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5172 Dunbar Ave 5182 Dunbar Ave 5112 Dunbar Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 131 11 163 131 12 163 131 13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17111 Harbor Bluffs Cir 17131 Harbor Bluffs Cir 17141 Harbor Bluffs Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 131 14 163 131 15 163 131 16 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17151 Harbor Bluffs Cir 17161 Harbor Bluffs Cir 17171 Harbor Bluffs Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 131 18 163 131 19 163 13120 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17162 Harbor Bluffs Cir 17152 Harbor Bluffs Cir 17142 Harbor Bluffs Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T �j/� /(�� W,a6P3 do-dod asodxa waded paaJ �r` @09L5 aIlduaal o aa asn ', w1096S ®����,� i of awl 6uole pua8MMUM s ���� lagel®faad Meg T AU3AV-09-008-L .w,dn-dod pjogaa al aalanaa luawa6aega f 009LS pA)13AV l!aege6 at zes!l!in i war�Gane nnnnnn ap wee aant{�ey el a zaitdaa ®ap suas aalad a sal!�e4 sallanbl13 163 131 22 163 131 24 163 14109 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17112 Harbor Bluffs Cir 17172 Bolsa Chica St 17441 Valeworth Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 16314208 163 14209 163 181 01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5531 Glenstone Dr 5521 Glenstone Dr 5501 Mossvale Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 181 02 163 191 09 163 191 16 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5521 Mossvale Cir 5391 Glenstone Dr 5311 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 191 18 163 252 04 163 252 33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5291 Glenstone Dr 17581 Crown Cir 17551 Putney Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 253 08 163 271 16 163 272 06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5302 Allstone Dr 17551 Bates Cir 17646 Gainsford Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 311 09 163 311 12 163 311 13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17308 Hampton Ln 17327 Hampton Ln 17317 Hampton Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 311 17 163 311 19 163 311 20 Occupant Occupant Occupant 4906 Shelburne Dr 17261 Bolsa Chica St 17326 Hampton Ln Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 163 311 22 939 541 16 939 541 19 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17348 Hampton Ln 5032 Dorado Dr#105 5032 Dorado Dr#108 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 23 939 541 25 939 541 26 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5032 Dorado Dr#208 5032 Dorado Dr#110 5032 Dorado Dr#111 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 32 939 541 34 939 541 35 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5031 Dorado Dr#101 5031 Dorado Dr#103 5031 Dorado Dr#104 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T r wla6p3 do-dod asodxa jaded paa� p09L5 aleldwaj 6�(aand asn 1 w1096S ®A 3AV ® � /1 /Q� o'jauil6uole pugs g ����/ slage] plaad Rse3 ji213A`d-O�-008-L widn-dod pjogaj al jalanaj luawabaeq� T 009LS®AM3AV j!jeges6 al zas!1!m ap suas i wordaane•nnnnnn ap ui}e 9.mg3eq el a zagdaa salad a sal!:)e4 sallanb!13 939 541 40 939 541 43 939 541 46 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5031 Dorado Dr 9105 5031 Dorado Dr#108 5031 Dorado Dr#207 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 48 939 541 49 939 541 54 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5031 Dorado Dr#109 5031 Dorado Dr#110 5031 Dorado Dr#211 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 56 939 541 57 939 541 58 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5071 Dorado Dr#101 5071 Dorado Dr#102 5071 Dorado Dr 9103 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 59 939 541 61 939 541 62 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5071 Dorado Dr#104 5071 Dorado Dr#202 5071 Dorado Dr#203 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 64 939 541 65 939 541 66 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5071 Dorado Dr#105 5071 Dorado Dr#106 5071 Dorado Dr#107 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 68 939 541 74 939 541 75 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5071 Dorado Dr#205 5071 Dorado Dr#111 5071 Dorado Dr#112 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 76 939 541 87 939 541 91 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5071 Dorado Dr#209 17172 Abalone Ln 9204 17172 Abalone Ln #108 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 541 98 939 541 99 939 542 00 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17172 Abalone Ln #111 17172 Abalone Ln #112 17172 Abalone Ln #209 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 01 939 542 02 939 542 05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17172 Abalone Ln #210 17172 Abalone Ln #211 5146 Dorado Dr#102 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 18 939 542 20 939 542 26 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5146 Dorado Dr#207 5146 Dorado Dr#109 5146 Dorado Dr#211 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 T wia6P3 do-dod asodxa Paljaded al I'' @09LS aleldwal®/Gang asp wa0965 ®�jJ��� �p 1110 i of aull 6u0je pua8 ® 'S1� slagel 01aad Ase3 T A21MV-09-008-L T dn-do o as a as n ;uawa6aey� f iae e 6 a zas{ in wi d W q I I� a sua p09L5®A2l3At!3 q { { uto�iGane nnr�►n� i ap ul}e wny�ey el g zalldau p S aa{ad a sa{{:)e1 sa}}anb{i3 939 542 27 939 542 29 939 542 37 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5146 Dorado Dr#212 17151 Corbina Ln #102 17151 Corbina Ln #106 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 38 939 542 39 939 542 42 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17151 Corbina Ln #107 17151 Corbina Ln #108 17151 Corbina Ln #207 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 44 939 542 53 939 542 56 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17151 Corbina Ln #109 17191 Corbina Ln #102 17191 Corbina Ln#201 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 93954257 939 542 59 939 542 61 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17191 Corbina Ln #202 17191 Corbina Ln 9204 17191 Corbina Ln #106 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 93954263 939 542 66 939 542 68 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17191 Corbina Ln #108 17191 Corbina Ln #207 17191 Corbina Ln #109 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 .939 542 69 939 542 70 939 542 71 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17191 Corbina Ln #110 17191 Corbina Ln #111 17191 Corbina Ln #112 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 93954274 939 542 75 939 542 84 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17191 Corbina Ln #211 17191 Corbina Ln #212 5101 Tortuga Dr#105 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 939 542 89 939 542 91 939 542 93 Occupant Occupant Occupant 5101 Tortuga Dr 9206 5101 Tortuga Dr#208 5101 Tortuga Dr#110 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 h .� �wi,0965 r w1a6p3 do-dod asodxa ® jaded paaj @0915 ale{dwal Gant/asn ' @AM3AV a i of auil 6uole puas ® i s{aql e �(se m{as d 3 Easy Peel' Labels (\�' }/J/}i A Bend along line to i / TM AVERY® 5960TM j Use Avery®Template 516Q� J Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge 1 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 N019NIINnH 61v9Z6 VO HOV39 N019NIINnH 0#3AV UVONna LSL9 9#3AV dV9Nna L9L9 V#3AV UVONna 1,91,9 INVdnOOO 1NVdn000 INVdn000 817 LZL £9L 817 LZL £9L 8v LZL £9l, 6179Z6 VO HOV30 N019NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 N019NIINnH a#3AV UV9Nna LZ05 0#3AV MV9Nna LZ09 9#3AV dV9Nna tLZ09 INVdnOOO INVdn000 1NVdn000 6Z LZL £91, 6Z LZL £91, 6Z LZL £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 N019NIINnH 6t79Z6 VO HOV39 N019NIINRH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 N019NIINnH V#3AV UV9Nna LZ09 a#3AV 2]V9Nna Lv09 V#3AV dV9Nna Lti09 INVdnOOO 1NVdn000 INVdnOOO 6Z LZL £91, 8Z LZL £9L 8Z LZL £91. 6-V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 N019NIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNI1NnH a#3AV?JV9Nna 1,909 0#3AV UV9Nna L909 9#3AV UV9Nna L909 INVdn000 iNVdn000 1NVdn000 LZ LZL £91, LZ LZL £9L LZ LZL E91, 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 N019NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH V#3AV WEINna 1,909 a#3AV UV9Nna LL09 0#3AV?JV9Nna LL09 1NVdn000 INVdn000 INVdnOOO LZ LZL £91, 9Z LZL £9L 9Z LZL £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNI1NnH 6t,9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6t79Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 9#3AV UV9Nna LL09 V#3AV NV9Nna 1,L09 Za#3AV 2JV9Nna 1609 INVdnO00 INVdnOOO INVdnOOO 9Z LZL £9L 9Z LZL £9L 9Z LZL £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV30 NOIJNIlNnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNI1NnH L3#3AV UV9Nna 1,609 La#3AV UV9Nna L609 La#3AV UV9Nna 1609 1NVdn000 INVdn000 1NVdn000 9Z LZL £9L 9Z LZL £9L 9Z LZL E9L 6tr9Z6 VO HOV30 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 N019NI1NnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 7_0#3AV UVONna L609 L0#3AV UV9Nna L609 0#3AV 2IV9Nna L609 1NVdn000 INVdnOOO INVdnOOO 9Z LZL £9L 9Z LZL £9L 9Z LZL £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6t,9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 9#3AV UV13Nna 1,609 V#3AV HV9Nna 1609 a#3AV 2tV9Nna LOL9 INVdnOOO 1NVdn000 INVdnOOO 9Z LZL £9L 9Z LZL £9L bZ LZL E9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 N019NI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 N019NI1NI IH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NO19NIINnH 0#3AV UV9Nna L0L9 9#3AV UVBNna LOL9 V#3AV 2iV9Nna LOL9 INVdn000 INVdn000 INYdnOOO t'Z LZL £9L tiZ LZL £9L tiZ LZL £91. Eticluettes faciles A peter Se®de Repliez www.avery.com hachure afin de; ww.averyeom Utilisez le g abarit AVERY�5160� 1 chargement reviler le rebord Pop-UpTM 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peer' Labels -may S i g �0/ // r-�}�_„C/ � Bend along line toTM � � AVERYO 5960TM , Use Avery®Template 5160 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge TM � 6179Z6 VO HOV39 N010NIINnH 61v9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV39 N010NIINf1H O#imo Sd3fll8 Zd09dVH Z80LL 9#mo S33f118 WO dVH Z80LL V#2110 S33f119 210gdvH Z90LL 1NVdf1000 INVdn000 INVdf10O0 60 ZZL E9 L 60 ZZL E9 L 60 ZZL E91, 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 N010NIINnH a#?J10 S33f119 U09bW ZLOLL 0#U10 Sd3f118 uO9uvH ZLOLL 9#UIO S311118 Wg'dVH ZLOLL 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 INVdf1000 80 ZZ L E9 L 80 ZZL £9 L 80 ZZL £9 L 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIINf1H 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 N010NIINf1H V#2i10 S33f119 IdOgIdW ZLOLL a#N131IS31 Z90L1 0#NI 311S31 Z90LL 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 INVdfl000 80 ZZL E9L LO ZZ1 £9L LO ZZL E96 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV39 N010NIINnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NlINf1H 9#N131IS31 Z80L L V#NI 311S31 Z80L L a#NI 311S31 Z90LL 1NVdr1000 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 LO ZZL £91, LO ZZL £9L 90 ZZL E91, 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NO1JNIlNf1H 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINnH 0#NI 311S31 Z90L I, 9#NI 311S31 Z90L L V#NI 311S31 Z90L L 1NVdf1000 INVdfl000 1NVdf1000 90 ZZC £9L 90 ZZL £91 90 ZZ1 £9L 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIlN11H 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINRH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H a#ZdIO S33f119 UOMJVH Z90LL 0#21IO S33f118 WO'dVH Z90LL 9#2d10 S33f119 UO921VH Z90LL 1NVdn000 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 to ZZ L £9 L to ZZL £91 tr0 ZZL £9 L 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH V#imo S33f119 UO9'dVH Z90LL Q#NI 311S31 L90L1, 0#NI 311S31 1,80L1, 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 INVd11000 tr0 ZZL E9L 09 LZL £9L OS LZL £91, 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV30 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 9#Nl31IS31 1,80L1 V#NI 311S31 1,80L1, a# NI 311S31 1,90LL 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 INVd11000 09 LZL £9L 09 LZ1 E9L 6tr 1ZL £91. 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 61v9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 0#NI 311S31 1,90L1, 9#NI 311S31 1,90L1, V#NI 311S31 1L90LL 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 617 LZL £9L 6tr LZL £91, 617 LZL £91, 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINIIH La#3AV 2:IVBNn(i L9 L9 3#3AV 21V9Nfla L9L9 a#3AV 2]V9Nna L9L9 INVdfl000 1NVdf1000 1NVd11000 817 LZL £9L 8tr LZL £9L 8tr LZL £91, ttiquettes faciles a peler ; Sens de Bepliez�la hachure afin de i vw w averycom Utilisez le g abarit AVERY@ 51600 chargement r6v6ler le rebord Pop-UpTM j 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy eep Labels /5�/� / O ® Bend along line to i / /� �� Tm Use Avvery®Template 51600, Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTmW 5960 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 61v9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNI1Nf1H 6179ZG VO HOV39 NOIE)MiNnH 9#3AV 11VONno ZLOS V#3AV dV9Nna ZL09 0#3AV 21V9Nna Z905 INVdf10O0 INVdfl000 INVdnODO 80£ZL £9L 90£ZL E% LO£ZL£91L 6ti9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIE)NIINf1H 6'v9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNaNnH 0#3AV WeNtla Z905 9#3AV dV9Nfla Z909 V#3AV dV8Nna Z905 INVdf1000 1NVdf1000 1NVd(1000 LO£ZL £9L LO£ZL £91, LO£ZL £91, 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIE)NIINf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI0NIINf1H 0#3AV 2JV9Nna Z50S 0#3AV dV9Nn(i Z90S 9#3AV 2IV8Nna Z905 INVdf10O0 INVdf1000 1NVdf1000 90£ZL £9L 90 CZ!, £9L 90 CZ!, £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIE)NIINnH 61r9Z6 VO HOV39 NOiONIINnH 6V9Z6 V0 HOV39 NOiONIiN{1H V#3AV UV9Nno ZSOS 0#3AV dV9Nna ZvOS 0#3AV UV9Nna Z605 INVdf1000 1NVdf1000 INVdf10O0 90£ZL £9L 90 CZ!, £9L 90 CZ!, £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI0NlINnH 61r9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIE)NI1NnH 9#3AV'8V9Nlla Zv05 V#3AV HV8Nno ZvOS a#3AV dV9Nna Z£05 1NVditO00 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 50£ZL £9L 90 CZ!, £9L vo£ZL £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 0#3AV 2IV9Nn(i Z£09 9#3AV HV9Nno Z£OS V#3AV NV9Nna Z£OS INVdf10O0 INVdf10O0 1NVdn000 t70£ZL £9L v0£ZL £91 t10£ZL £91. 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIE)NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIEJNI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIE)NIINnH a#IS VOIHO VS109 ZZLLL 0#1S VOIHO VS109 ZZLLL 9#IS VOIHO VS1O9 ZZLLL INVdf1000 INVdfl000 1NVdn000 £0 CZ!, £9L £0£ZL £9L £0£ZL £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIE)NI1Nf1H 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIINf1H a#itin S33f11911O91WH ZOLLL 0#dio S33f119 21091JVH ZOLLL 9#do S33f119 UOMlVH ZOLLL 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1O00 LL ZZ1, £9L LL ZZL £9L LL ZZL £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINf1H V#23I0 S33f119 WM:fVH ZOLLL 0#2110 S33f119 U09WH Z60LL 0#2110 S33f119 U0921VH Z60LL 1NVdf1O00 INVdfl000 INVdf1000 LL ZZL £91 OL ZZL £9L OL ZZL £9L 61'9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIE)NIINnH 9#zin S33m9 2I09dVH MOLL V#2110 S33f119 TJ09'dVH Z60LL a#2I10 S33f119 HO921VH Z80LL INVdf1000 INVdf10O0 INVdfl000 M ZZL £91 OL ZZL £9L 50 ZZL E9L Etiquettes faciles a peler Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de{ wvvw.averyeom Utilisez le g abarit AVERYO 51600 J chargement r60-ler le rebord Pop-UpTM� 1-800-GO-AVERY L Easy PeelI5 Labels A Bend along line to i Use Avery®Template 5160d ,� Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM / WAVERYO 5960T-� 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINf1H 6f9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINf1H V#3AV dV9Nfla ZZ1g 0#3AV 8V9NnG Z819 O#3AV INEINf10 Z8L9 INVdf1000 1NVdf10O0 INVdf1OOO 86 CZ!, £9l 91, £ZL £91 91 £711 £9l- 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINf1H 9#3AV IWONfla Z819 V#3AV IJV9Nna mg a#3AV UVEIN110 ZL19 INVdf1000 INVdf1000 INVdf1000 91. £Z!. £91 91. CZ!, £91 tlL £Z1 £91 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINf1H 669Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINf1H O#3AV NVBNna ZLl9 9#3AV 21V9Nf10 ZLl9 V#3AV IMNI10 ZL19 INVdf1000 INVdf1000 INVdf1000 t1l £Z1, £91 t11 £ZL £9l £Z1 £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIlNf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINf1H 0#3AV dV9Nfla 9919 O#3AV AV9Nna 99L9 9#3AV INONfla 9919 INVdf1000 INVdf1000 INVdnOOO £1£Z1 £96 £L £Zl £9l £L £ZL £9L 6M9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINAH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H V#3AV 2lV9Nfla 9919 0#3AV UV9Nna ZOL9 O#3AV UV9Nna ZOIg 1NVdn000 1NVdf1000 INVdf1000 £LEZL £91 LL £ZL £91 1,1, £Z!. £91 6t79Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6t,9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNI1Nf1H 9#3AV UVONnO ZOl9 V#3AV HV9Nf10 ZOIg 0#3AV UV9Nno Z609 1NVdf10O0 INVdn000 1NVdf1000 LL CZ!, £96 11 £ZL £91, OL CZ!, £91 6'v9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6t79Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H O#3AV UVONna Z609 9#3AV UV9Nna Z60g V#3AV UVEINf10 Z609 INVdf1000 1NVdf1000 INVdf1000 OL£ZL £9L Ol£Z1 £91 01 £Z1 £9L 6t79Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6v9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 3#3AV UVEINna Z80g lV#3AV UVEINna 8Z0g 0#3AV UV9Nfla Z80g INVdf1000 INVdflOOO 1NVdAOOO 60£ZL £91, 60£ZL £91 60£Z1 £91 6t,9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINCIH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 6t,9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINf1H O#3AV ZIV9Nfla Z80g 9#3AV dV9Nna Z80g V#3AV UV9Nf10 Z80g INVdf1000 INVdf1000 1NVdf1000 60£Z1 £9l 60£Z1 £96 60£ZC £91 6V9 Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINIIH 6t,9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINf1H 3#3AV 2iVONna ZL09 0#3AV 21V9Nf10 ZLos O#3AV UV9Nf10 ZLOS INVdn000 INVdf1000 INVdf1000 80£Z1 £91 80£Z1 £9l 80£ZL £91 Etiquettes faciles a peter SenAs de Repliez a la hachure afin de� wvvw.averyCom Utilisez{e gabarit AVERY®51600 chargement r6v6ler le rebord Pop-UpTM 1-800-GO-AVERY A Easy PeelO Labels A Bend along line to i r / ' Use Avery®Template 51600— ` 1{J; Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM �j0� WAVERY0 5960TM 61v9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NI1NnH 1•0#3AV 2iV9Nna ZVLs LV#3AV'dV9Nna ZVLs 3#3AV dV9Nna ZVIs INVdn0O0 INVdnOOO INVdnOOO 6Z£Z6 £96 �z£Z!. £9!. 6z£Z1 £9l, 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 61r9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NI1NnH a#3AV UV9Nn(7 ZV1•s 0#3AV BV9Nno zVl s 9#3AV UVEINna zns INVdnOOO INVdn000 INVdnOOO 2 CZ!, £9L 6Z CZ!, £91 lZ£Z6 £96 6V97-6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH V#3AV WONna zvi g 1a#3AV UV9Nna Z£l9 60#3AV�IVBNna mg INVdnOOO INVdnOOO LNVdnOOO LZ£Z1• £96 0Z£ZL £91 Oz£Z6 £96 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NI1NnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 1,9#3AV dV9Nna Z£6s I V#3AV I-MNna Z£1S a#3AV 2IV9Nna Z£ts 1NVdnOOO INVdnOOO INVdnOOO OZ£Z1• C% OZ£Z6 £96 OZ£Z1 £96 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 0#3AV UVONna Z£1•s 0#3AV dV9Nna Z£LS 9#3AV 2iV9Nna Z,us INVdn000 INVdnOOO 1NVdnOOO Oz£z1; £9E OZ CZ!, £96 OZ CZ!, CM 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOi9NIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOION►1NnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NO1JNl1NnH 60#3AV dVONn0 ZL Ls 10#3AV 2iV9Nna Z L is 1,9#3AV 21V9Nna Z1 Ls INVdnOOO INVdnOOO INVdn000 66 £Z1• £91• 61, £ZL £91 66 £Z1 £96 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH LV#3AV dV9Nna z 6 Ls a#3AV dV9Nna Z l is 0#3AV*dV9Nna z i i s INVdnOOO INVdnOOO INVdnOOO 61• £ZL £96 61, £ZL £91 61• EZl £9l• 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINiIH 9#3AV 2JV9Nna Z 1 is V#3AV UV9Nna Z 1 Ls I.a#3AV UV9Nna zus INVdnOOO INVdnOOO INVdnOOO 61 £Z1. £91 61CZ1, M 86 £Zl £96 6179Z6 VO HOV39 N019NIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOI9NIINnH 10#3"UV9Nna mg 69#3AV UV9Nna Zz1s LV#3AV WgNna zas 1NVdnOOO INVdnOOO 1NVdnOOO 81• £ZL £91 81 £ZL £9l 91, EZ1 £9L 6179 Z6 VO HOV39 N019NIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NI1NnH a#3AV IdV9Nna ZZ1S 0#3AV UV9Nna ZZIS 9#3AV dV9Nna zag INVdnOOO INVdnOOO INVdnOOO 86 £zt £91, 96 M £9L 86 £Z6 £9l Eticluettes faciles a peler i 5eA de Repliez�la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le g abarit AVERY®51600 chargement r46v6ler le rebord Pop_UpTM 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 1 T AH3AV-09-008-L T Wldn-dod pjogaj al Jalgnipj ivawa6jey:) I wog Iliane'AWM ap sues p09LS pAH3AV ilaege 6 al zaslll;n ap uge a�ny�ey el zalldaa i salad a salpeI sauanbM 163 123 22 163 12322 163 123 22 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 5152 DUNBAR AVE#B 5152 DUNBAR AVE#C 5152 DUNBAR AVE#D HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 123 22 163 12322 163 131 11 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 5152 DUNBAR AVE#D1 5152 DUNBAR AVE#E 17111 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 131 11 163 131 11 163 131 11 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17111 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#B 17111 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#C 17111 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#D HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA#92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 131 12 163 131 12 163 131 12 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17131 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#A 17131 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#B 17131 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#C HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 131 12 163 131 13 163 131 13 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17131 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#D 17141 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#A 17141 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#B HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 131 13 163 131 13 163 131 14 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17141 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#C 17141 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#D 17151 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 131 14 163 131 14 163 131 14 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17151 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#B 17151 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#C 17151 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#D HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 131 15 163 131 15 163 131 15 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17161 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#A 17161 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#B 17161 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#C HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 131 15 163 131 16 163 131 16 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17161 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#D 17171 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#A 17171 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#B HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 131 16 163 131 16 163 131 17 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#C 17171 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#D 17172 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 Tw1096S J �/ oC� f wia6p3 dn-dod asodxa �. jaded paaJ f � ®09L5 aleldwaj and asn ®��3�� of awl 6uole puag �® S/ � slage-I O)Iaad Ase3 Easy Peep Labels i ® Bend along line to i Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ' � AVERYO 5960TM � 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOlONIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOlONI1NnH a#IdIO S33f119 U0918VFi ZLLLL O#2110 S33f1i8?:jogdVH ZLLLL 1NVdIl000 1NVdnOOO ZZ [Cl £91 ZZ LEI, £9l, 61V97-6 VO HOV39 NOlONIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOlJNIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIlNf1H 9#Zito S33(tl9 2109ZIVH ZL LLL V#ao S33f118 uoodvH ZLLLL Q#21IO S33f119 2i092iVH Ztrl LL 1Nvdn000 1NVdfl000 1NVdn000 ZZ L£L £9l, ZZ L£L £91. ZZ L£L £9l, 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOlONIlNnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIlNnH 6f9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIlNnH O#�10 S33(ll9 AO821VH Z£LLL O#?!IO S33f118 21O821VH Z£LLL wdio S33f119 tJOMJVH Z£LLL 1Nvdf1000 1Nvdn000 1NVdf1000 LZ L£L £9L LZ L£L £9L LZ L£L £91, 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NO1JNIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOlONIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOlONIlNnH v#Z11O S33f119 UO9UVH Z£LLL O#an s-.role A09UVH ZfLLL 9#un S31f119 210921VH ZfLLl 1NVdnOOO 1NVdfl000 1Nvdn000 LZ L£L £9L OZ l£L £9L OZ L£L £9L 6f9Z6 VO HOV39 NO1JNilNnH 6f9Z6 VO HOV39 NOlJNIlNnH 6f9Z6 VO HOV39 NOlONIlNnH V#2HIO S33f118 WEI'dVH ZfLLL O#2110 S33(ll9 UO9'dVH ZSLLL O#NIO S33f119 21O8UVH Z91,L1, 1NVdfl000 1NVdflOOO 1NVdt1000 OZ L£L £9L 61, L£L £91, 61, L£L £91, 61792:6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIlNI11-1 6f9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIlNnH 9#ZJIO S33(1l9 1:10921VH ZSLLL V#NIO S33f1i8 2 ommH ZSLLL 0#NIO S33f119 uoeuvH Z91,L1, 1NVdf1000 1Nvdf1000 1Nvdn000 61, LEI, £96 61, L£L £91 LL l£L £91, 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOlJNIlNnH O#2ItO S33(ll9 ZIOMJVH Z91,L6 9#un S33f119'IO9UVH Z91,LL V#ao S33f118 UOe'dVH ZSLLL 1NVdnOOO 1NVdn000 1NVdnOOO LL L£L £91, LL L£L £9l, LL L£L £91, 6f9 Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIiNnH 6f9Z6 VO HOV39 NO1JNIlNf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NO1JNIlNnH a# -dio s-Aim9 U09'HVH ZLLLL O#ZItO S331119 2J0MVH ZLLLL 8#NIO SAin18 U0921VH ZLLLL 1NVdn000 1NVdf1000 1NVdn000 LL L£L £91, LL L£L M LL L£L £91, t fiquettes f stiles a peter Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de i www.ave cam 1 Utilisez le g abarit AVERY®51600 chargement r6v61er le rebord Pop-UpTM 1-800-GO-AVERY t 1 Easy Peep Labels i A Rend along line to AVERY® 5960TM Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNI1Nf1H 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH bZ#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL £Z#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL ZZ#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL 1NVdf1000 INVdn000 INVdn000 17Z LEI £9L tiZ L£L £9L 17Z L£L £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH LZ#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL OZ#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL 60 IS VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL INVdn000 1NVdfl000 1NVdA000 trZ LEI £9L 17Z L£L £9L 17Z LEI £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINAH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NO10NlINnH 8L#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL LL#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLL1 91#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 INVdfl000 VZ LEI £9L PZ LEL £9L t7Z L£L £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 669Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI-LNnH 6tV9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNI1NnH 9L4 1S VOIHO VS103 ZLLLL K#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL £L#IS V01HO VS108 ZLLLL 1NVdf10O0 INVdn000 1NVdf1000 17Z LEI £9L t7Z L£L £9L VZ LEI £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 669Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 6v9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH ZL#1S VOIHO VS103 ZLLLL L L#1S VOIHO VS109 ZLLL1 OL#1S VOIHO VS109 ZLLLL INVdf1000 INVdn000 INVdf1000 tiZ L£L £91, t7Z L£L £9L t7Z L£L £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOI9NlINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI-LNf1H 64IS VOIHO VS-108 ZLLLL 8#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL L#1S VOIHO VS109 ZLLLL INVdf1000 INVdn000 INVd(lOOO l7Z LEI £9L 6Z LEI £91, trZ L£L £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 09Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 94t 1S VOIHO VS109 ZLLL1 94 IS VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL b#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL INVdn000 INVd(1000 INVdn000 t7Z LEI, £9L trZ L£L £91 t1Z L£L £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH EW 1S VOiHO VS109 ZLLLL Z#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLL1 L#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL INVdn000 INVdf1000 1NVdf1000 t7Z LEI £9L VZ L£L £9L VZ L£L £9L Etiquettes faciles a peter ; ® Repliez a la hachure afin de; www.avery.com Utilisez le abarit AVERY®51600 Sens de r6v�ler le rebord Po -U TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 I chargement p p , A Easy Peelu Labels i A Bend along line to AVERY0 5960TM � Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM 1 (21 !/ 61797,6 VO HOV30 NOlJNIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNIlNnH 8V#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI LV#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI 9V#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 VZ L£L £9l VZ l£l £9L VZ L£L £9l 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNI1NnH 09Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNIlNnH 9V#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI 17"1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI £V#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLlll 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 1NVdnOOO VZ L£l £9l VZ l£L £9L VZ l£l £9l 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNIlNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 N019NIlNnH Z"1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL LV#1S V01HO VS108 ZLLLl OV#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLILL 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 VZ L£L £9L VZ LU £91, VZ L£L £9l 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNIlNnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNIlNnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOI9NIlNnH 6E4 1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI 8£#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI L£#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 VZ l£L £9L VZ L£l £9l VZ L£l £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNI1NnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOlJNI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOi9NIlNnH 9E#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL 5£#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI V£#1S VOIH0 VS108 ZLLLI 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 VZ l£L £9L VZ L£L £9L VZ L£L £96 6179ZG VO HOV38 NOlJNIlNnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NO1JNIlNnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNIlNnH £E#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLILL Z£#1S VOIHO VS109 ZLLLL L£#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 VZ L£l E9[ VZ l£L £9L VZ L£l £9l 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNIlNnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIDNIlNnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNI1NnH Ol;#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL 6Z#1S V01HO VS108 ZLLLL 8Z#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 VZ [Cl, £9L VZ L£l £9L VZ [Cl, £9l 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJNIJ-NnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOlJN1INnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIDMINnH LZ#1S VOIHO VS103 ZLLLL 9Z#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLL 9Z#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLLLI 1NVdn0O0 1NVdnO00 1NVdn000 VZ L£L £9L VZ L£L £9L VZ L£L £9l Etiquettes faciles a peler ; Repliez A la hachure afin de www.averycom Senscle Utilisez le g abarit AVERY"51600 j chargement r6v6ler le rebord Pop-UWIA 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy Peep Labels i A Bend along line to i AVERYO 5960TM Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper ®® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM , 1 6VM6 VO HOV38 NOIONUNf1H 6tr9Z6 VO HOV30 NOiDNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH ZL#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI IL#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLILI OL#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI INVdnOOO INVdf1000 1NVdf1000 trZ I£I £9I trZ I£I £9I trZ I£I £9I 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 69#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI 99#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLILI L9#IS VOIHO VS109 ZLILI INVdnOOO INVdf1000 1NVdf1000 trZ I£I 01, trZ I£I E91, trZ I£I £9I 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONI1NnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 99#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI 99#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLILI 179#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 trZ I£I £9I trZ LEI £9I trZ I£I £9I 61V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINf1H £9#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI Z9#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI I9#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI INVd(1000 1NVdf1000 iNVdnOOO trZ I£I £9I trZ I£I £9I trZ I£I £9 6tr9Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINnH 6179Z6 V0 HOV38 NOIONIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONI1NnH 09#IS VOIHO VS108 ZL IL I 69#IS VOIHO VS108 ZL IL I 99#IS VOIHO VS108 ZL I L I INVd(1000 INVdf1000 INVd11000 trZ I£I £9I trZ I£I £9I trZ I£I £9I 6tr9Z6: VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH LS#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI 99#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI 99#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLILI INVd(1000 INVd(1000 1NVd(1000 trZ I£I £91, trZ I£I £9I trZ ICI £9I 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 6tr9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH tr94 IS V31HO VS-108 MLI £5#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI Z9#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI 1NVdf1O00 1NVdn000 INVd(1000 trZ I£I £9I trZ I£I £94 trZ ICI £9I 6tr9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIONIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH I9#1S VOIHO VS108 ZLILI 09#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLILI 6V#IS VOIHO VS108 ZLIL.I 1NVdf1000 INVdnOOO 1NVdf1000 trZ LEI £94 VZ I£I £9I trZ I£I £9I Eticluettes faciles a peter ; ® Repliez a la hachure afin de; www.averycom ; Utilisez le abarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de r6v6ler le rebord Pop-UpTM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 ,1 chargement j 1 Y juaWabaey� r A2i3At1-09-008-L � w,d{{-dod plogaa at aatanaa , ®09L5®A2l3nt!}!aege al zas!y}n a ut a aan �e el e zat da ap sua5 i wo,°daane-NV" ; P I 4 N . I N aa!ad a sa�!�e�sa��anb!13 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST #1 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#2 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST hQ HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#4 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#5 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#6 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#7 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST 98 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#9 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST 910 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#11 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST 912 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#13 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#14 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#15 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#16 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST 417 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#18 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#19 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST 920 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#21 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#22 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#23 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST 924 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#25 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#26 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 r Wla6P3 do-dod asodxa jaded paaj r @09L5 a}e!dwal OAJ8AV asn T wi0965 a i of au!t 6uote puss ® stage ®laad Ase3 oR�131l� AMMV-09-008-L f W, �- d p q l luawadjeg3 '� d do jo as a as anaj , p09L5®A2f3n1Y}uege t5 al zas!l!}(} uas wojane-AWAn ap ui}e ajnq�eq el a zaiidaa ap sv ri( i jalad a sal!:)e4 sa}}anb!13 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#27 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#28 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#29 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#30 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#31 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#32 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#33 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#34 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#35 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#36 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#37 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#38 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#39 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#40 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#41 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#42 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#43 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#44 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#45 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#46 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST 448 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#49 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#50 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 163 281 06 163 281 06 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#51 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#52 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 Wla6p3 do-dod asodxa _., jaded paaj 0)09LS a}eldwa,L @AJand as(1 wi096S ®����� i o;auil 6uole pua8 p slage3 ®land Rse3 i = , I Easy Peel® Labels i A Bend along line to i A`/ERY® 5960TM Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM , 1 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 9L#1S VOIHO VS108 LLILI LL#19 VOIHO VS108 ILLLI 1NVdn330 INVdnOOO 90 I8Z £9I 90 1,9Z £9 L 669Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6-V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 61179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 9L#1S VOIHO VS108 ILILL 9L#1S VOIH3 VS108 LLILI VL#1S V31H3 VS108 ILILI INVdn030 1NVdn000 1NVdn000 90 1,9Z £9I 90 I8Z £9I 90 68Z £9I 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 6J;19Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH £L#1S VOIHO VS108 ILILL ZL#IS VOIHO VS109 ILLLL LL#1S VOIHO VS108 LLILI 1NVdn000 1NVdf1330 1NVdn000 90 1.8Z £9I 90 68Z £9I 90 I8Z £9I 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 669Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNl1NnH OL#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLI 69#IS VOIHO VS108 LLILI 89#1S VOIH3 VS108 ILILL INVdnOOO 1NVdn3O0 1NVdn330 90 1.8Z £9I 90 I8Z £9I 90 68Z £9I 669Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 60M VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIiNnH L94 IS VOIHO VS108 LLLLI 994 1S V31HO VS108 ILILI 99#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL INVdn330 1NVdn300 1NVdn000 90 1,9z £9I 90 I8Z 01, 90 68Z £9 L 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNlINnH 6t,9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6t79Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH V94 1S VOIHO VS108 ILLLI £9#IS V31HO VS108 LLILI Z9#1S VOIHO VS108 LLILI 1NVdn030 INVdn3O0 INVdn300 90 I8Z £9I 90 1,9Z £9I 90 I8Z £9I 6V9Z6 VO HOV30 NOIJNI1NnH 6b9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 19##IS VOIHO VS109 LLLLI 09#1S VOIHO VS108 LLILI 69#1S VOIHO VS108 ILILI INVdnOOO 1NVdn000 INVdnOOO 90 1.8Z £9L 90 I8Z £9I 90 I8Z £91. 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6P9Z6 VO HOV30 NOIJNI1NnH 669Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 85##1S VOIHO VS108 LULL L9#1S V31HO VS108 LULL 99#1S VOIHO VS108 ILILI INVdn3O0 1NVdn3O0 INVdnO30 90 I8Z £9 L 90 1,9Z £9I 90 1.9Z £9 I 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI-LNnH 6179Z6 VO HOV39 NOIJNI1NnH 61179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIONIINnH 55�#1S V31HO VS108 ILLLI 179#1S VOIHO VS108 ILILI £5#IS V31HO VS108 ILILI 1NVdn000 INVdn330 1NVdn000 90 I8Z £9I 90 I8Z £9I 90 I8Z £9I tiquettes f aciles a peter ; A Repliez a la hachure afin de i www.avery.com 0 0 Sens de reveler le rebord Po U TM 1-800-GO-AVERY s Utilisez le g abarit AVERY 5160 i chargement p p 1 1 Easy PeelO Labels A Bend along line to i ® O 5960TM i i ® Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edger'" ����� ' Use Avery®Template 5160 J 1 1 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOl!JNI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH VOL#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL £OL#1S V01HO VS108 LLLLL INVdf13O0 INVdflOOO 90 1,8Z £91, 90 1.8Z £96 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOI9N1INnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH ZOL#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 1,014 1S V01HO VS108 LLLLL OOL#IS VOIH3 VS108 LLLLL 1NVdflO30 1NVdf1O30 INVdnoclo 90 LSZ £9L 90 1,8Z £9L 90 1,8Z £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NO1JNIiNnH 66#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 964 1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL L6#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 1NVdf)3O0 INVdfl000 INVdflOOO 90 LSZ £9L 90 1,8Z £9L 90 1,8Z £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1Nf1H 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 96#1S V31HO VS108 LLLLL 66#IS V01HO VS108 LLLLL 176#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL INVdnoocl 1NVdfl000 1NVdfl000 90 L83 £9L 90 1,8Z £9L 90 L8Z £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NO1JNIINnH 61v9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH £6#1S V31HO VS108 LLLLL Z6#IS VOIHO VS108 LLLLL L6#1S V01HO VS108 LLLLL 1NVdf1300 1NVdflO30 1NVdfl000 90 1.8Z £9L 90 1,8Z £91, 90 L8Z £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 06#IS VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 69#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 99#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL INVdfl000 1NVdn000 1NVdnOOO 90 18Z £91 90 1,8Z £9L 90 L8Z £91 64v9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV30 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH L8#1S VOIH3 VS108 LLLLL 98#1S VOIHO VS100 LLLLL 99#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 1NVdnOOO INVdf1300 INVdfl330 90 1,8Z £9L 90 1,8Z £91. 90 1,8Z £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 17941S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL £8#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL Z9#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL INVdflO30 INVdf1300 INVdnOOO 90 1,8Z £9L 90 1,8Z £9L 90 L8Z £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NO1JN11NnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NO-LOMINAH 6V9Z6 VO HOV33 NOIJNIINnH I 1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 09#IS VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 6L#1S V31H3 VS108 LLLLL INVdf1O30 INVdAOOO INVdf1330 90 1,8Z £91 90 1,8Z £9L 90 L8Z £9L Etiquettes faciles a peter ; ® Repliez a la hachure afin de wvvw.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERYO 51600 Sens de reveler le rebord Pop-Ups"' � 1-800-GO-AVERY j charoement 1 i Easy Peeh Labels - ® Bend along line to I AVERY® 5960TM Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge TM Use Avery®Template 51600 Z(21 </ 6V9Z6 VO HOV33 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 0£L#IS VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 6ZL#1S V01HO VS108 LLLLL i 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 90 1,8Z £91, 90 L8Z£9L 6tr9Z6 VO HOV38 NOI)NIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV33 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 87,14 IS V01HO VS108 LLLLL LZL#1S V01HO VS108 LLLLL 9ZL#1S V01HO VS108 LLW 1NVdf1000 1NVdf1000 1NVdn000 90 1,8Z £9L 90 1,8Z £9L 90 1.8Z £9L 6t'9Z6 VO HOV38 NOI9N1INnH 61'9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NO1JNIiNnH 9ZL#1S V01HO VS108 LLLLL VZL#1S V01HO VS108 LLLLL £ZL#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL INVdnOOO INVdf1000 1NVdf1000 90 L8Z £9L 90 18Z £9L 90 L8Z £9L 6t797-6 VO HOV38 N010MIN11H 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH ZZL#IS VOIHO VS108 LLLLL LZL#IS V01HO VS108 LLLLL OZL#1S V01HO VS108 LLLLL INVdf1000 INVd(1000 INVd(1000 90 1,8Z £9L 90 1,8Z£9L 90 1,8Z £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV39 NOI!DNI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 61,L#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL SL L#IS VO1HO VS108 LLLLL LL L#IS VOIHO VS108 LLLLL INVdf1000 1NVdn000 INVd(1000 90 1,8Z £9L 90 L8Z £9L 90 L8Z £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOl`JNIINAH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 91,L#IS VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 9L L#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL VL L#1S VOIHO VS1O8 LLLLL 1NVdf1000 INVdf1000 INVd(1000 90 1,8Z £9L 90 L8Z £9l 90 1,8Z £9L 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 669Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINAH 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH £L L4f 1S VOIHO VS1O8 LLLLL ZL L#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL L L L#1S V01HO VS1O8 LLLLL 1NVd(1000 INVdf1000 INVdf1000 90 L8Z £9L 90 L8Z £9L 90 L8Z £9L 6V9Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNI1NnH 6179Z6 VO HOV38 NOIJNIINnH 6179Z6 VO HOV30 NOIJNlINnH OL 1W 1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 600 1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 80L#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 1NVdf1000 INVdf1000 INVd(1000 90 1,8Z £9L 90 1,8Z £9L 90 1,8Z £9L 6V9Z6 NO HOV38 NOIJNI-LNnH 6b9Z6 VO HOV33 NOIJNIINnH 6t79Z6 VO HOV39 NOI9NI1NnH LOL##IS VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 901#1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL 901,4 1S VOIHO VS108 LLLLL INVd(1000 1NVd(1000 INVdf1000 90 19Z £9L 90 1,8Z £91. 90 L8Z£9L Eticluettes faciles a peter ; ® Repliez 6 la hachure afin de i www.avery.com Sens de reveler le rebord Pop-UpTPA 1-800-GO-AVERY Utilisez le g abarit AVERY®51600 i charaement 1 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerks ;P.;A 2�11 21D2 City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk "`k P.O. Box 190 'e Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ; Jt % f� d Prom - LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING r and 163 12208 Occupant" 17072 Harbor Bluffs Cir Huntington E RMTU RN TO SENDER 01S Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk m P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ` eR , n � P , F , LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ® p�' 1 163 122 09 Occupant 11v 17082 Harbor V bbb Huntington Be 00 O z�,+' 09 RE•T URN 'T0 SENDER of�� :E:l+iSUE='FICIE=N`!" AODRMS— UNAMLV- TO FORWARD 6 � �� DC: 92640039090 *2+:777-065 :9-25 -25 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk `J,A City of Huntington Beach b Office of the City Clerk00.4 °t P.O. Box190 r Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ; 40 r` X Imo' s hid r s LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING tk r7 0�d'Q� P14 163 12207 Occupant . ® /t//�� (y//J _ 17082 Leslie Ln Huntington Be--, nn n'1cAn RETURN TO SENDCR pap K INS1.jF'F=It-'I€:taiT �aP3C�F�I'�=: 1 ) ` r0R!-%�ARO E3C : 926400t9090 *2tJ'T7--0 ell SZ16 `a 25 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk . City of Huntington Beach �� Office of the City Clerk1,2 P.O. Box 190 ` Huntington Beach, CA 92648y� '' ` '0 a!A 0,E` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING fr . QnJ p163 12204 Occupant ,>Iwo+ '�' �. ©� 17062 Harbor Bluffs Cir Huntington E c�iz:R �2077 0 6635 -25-2 5 ��'c�'Sr�:��.r. r�•-��"3�``�, � j ,,,1,1,i1,,,I„Il„1,I1,,,,,,ill,l„il„,1,1„11,,,,,1,)I Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach i 4 Office of the City Clerk e%ll UU 4 1, P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 c Cr " T A E LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING S IS A 163 122 1�4 ALL MAIL � V'ECIFIC A S F7 'Utluffs Cir R' J1 E Hun1inqtq0,jTo R Brae T—? CIS 1 1;1z: 1;091 RETURN 'TO -SENDF-P INSUFFICXENT UNAeL-C TO FORWARD MC: 92$400119090 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 4, City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk t P.O. Box 190 X, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Xw E_ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ads 163131 18 Occupant 17162 Harbor Ph iffiz (-.ir Huntington BEa� C �AMXMT:1. 9 217 om I INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNAMLEZ TO FORWARD C.42640019090 *207706517-2522F Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk A.It City of Huntington Beach pill IF 4, Office of the City Clerk n A '5 M An 4+ J&t P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P"Ta�kl.'s'row 926—"-3, 'LIS 0STAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING � ' 163 131 20 Occupant 33 17142 Harbor Bluffs Cir ALL i Huntingtoi A '("o I — Tf) M Vy"I E 9727 lip. 1 00 CVSJ'.�1:5/09 RI CTURN TO ide INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS 'TO FORIA)ARD DC. 92f54S-019090 Ar 2 07 0 6 S 119 21'45 '12 IS Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Mel I Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648f. VI,N v� A, LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 131 19 C2 PA Occupant 17152 Harb( Huntington B �A%X1 U. 927 IDE A. ms 09 RETURN TO SMNDER IN-SUFf"FICIENT ADDRESS L)NAMLE TO FORWARD MC, 92640019090 *2077-06540-25-25 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk INC t, City of Huntington Beach 2- a, Office of the City Clerk t'� A -4, P.O. Box 190 7� Huntington Beach, CA 92648 4 1-` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING c? nd < �DDPESS 163 122 11 m � p�' Occupant �D TO 17102 Harbor Bluffs Cir i /I / _, Q Huntington Be;3(,,h (-.A 0')rAO I've UNAML.E. TO PORWARD I)Ml W)1)111lll ill Mill 11111)1111 Ilk])ill M H lill Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Fqtam E Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 IN LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 131 22 p Occuant 17112 Harbor Bl" Huntington Bead Do om-P215,?C)SO RE. -)RN TN,SUFr1C1FD--4'r UNAC-�LE: TO FORIdAR0 92841 0:19o!?c *2077-06520-2 S-25 900190 11111 it 111111111 il 1111111 Ml I I tilm Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach UJ � * Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 ti r Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Ct � MoOeot^m :: LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING 163 123 15� �c Occupant ,� La� Lr l:. Hunting ton bAe ,16a1 e Q -- gtO R- � ro 00anCI RETURN 'TO S C:A3 C9 Ew R rg TNSUFF1CXr7-NT ADDRESS -x2077 6 d-L9 Ili �Jfi5 till .?I:I)t il�li.�ll Joan L. Flynn, City Clerka. City of Huntington Beach021 ' pR . Office of the City Clerk a j _v P.O. Box 190 tA Huntington Beach, CA 92648 _ �w z 2 U. = . P ;A LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING � _ r, rr• rr !1 C•� y q S-T I-U fi S an IiE #I l 'f3�Pi 163123 14 Occupant 5172 Dunbar Av !1 Huntington Beacl RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNASLIZ '70 F eaP; ARD ���9 XIF� O190 11,1MIII1I11,,,1a,11,I1I11I III),I1111>>11>>)lJ IM1111Jill Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach $0(', A 14L Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 0'."n trm CL "7 "'OSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING � � a 163 123 19 OCCUPANT YYY 5112 DUNBAR AVE 413 1 A HUNTINGTON BE7A,-U r, CV)nAll RMTURN TO SENDER '.iACANT 1c, UNAMLE TO FORWARD 0 9 '19 93 111)1]JIM MIJ M Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach RX 4 A' Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 FU' . Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,TAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING qn C9 163 121 22 Occupant 5121 Dunbar Ave N, Huntington Beach C rd:Ll MC 27 DC i RETURN 170 SCMDER �/ACAN T UNASLE TO FORWARD 9254fF-10:19090 *2077-090 0::3-25-25 \91ieAt IL 9® Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 12 L`1'65 2 City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk V� 0 O'C", 4 ` ) P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 m 01 From za. PIZ S POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING 1 163 121 23 Occupant 5111 DunbarP— Huntington Be�P 2 7 ri V. I RCTURN TO SF-NDF;R V ACANT Q rks Ue(R ) UNADLC TO FORWARD 0 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 93 City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 6r P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 EGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:r 163 123 10 6�? NO, OCCUPANT 5092 DUNBAR AVE 4D HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 9 127 'DIM I RT-',TURN TO V—rNOFR VACANT UNAMLE TO 11'ORWARD I Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk JeW 012 162099-,,`-,` City of Huntington Beach V Office of the City Clerk $00.4 14-- P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 u., 51, LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING a - NO, 9 � 16312304 OCCUPANT 5032 DUNBAR AVE#C HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 C/1 S':L"7 'or 1 00 RETURN 'TO VAiC.ANT UNAOLE 'TO FORIWARD MC: 9,2�54CD0190-30 *2077-O90e5---2s--2,s 9�'2 0190 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk t:..... 0 2 C,2 9 P' City of Huntington Beach !m, V l A A A Office of the City Clerk �- P.O. Box 190 71 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 "s 0 ST LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING C9 163 12305 ............ IT Occupant 5042 Dunbar Ave Huntington Bea, W1-A IS- V 7 DS 00 CIS,/-�SY09 t PETURN TO S.ENDER VACA NT Pot rk UNAMLE TO F'ORWARD 0 C,-, :9 2 5 4:0 0 19 0 9 0 *,2077r-.0qO0-,"--'2 0:1 so ))JIM I;I I)IMI)JIld IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHI Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk A, City of Huntington Beach I gui c Office of the City Clerk (JUA P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 0 S P 0 S7A G E E EGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING C- 16312-127 OCCUPANT �/�, pks 5051 DUNBAR AVE#A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA A264A 9 tA MX'l rz 7 r)S 1 00 osj2s�09 REITURN TO SENDER V A CA N'T UNAML5! TO POPWAPO SC: 92840011,9090 *2077090042525 9 21 MID CN 0 90 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk W, City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 2 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 irk,-z j EKI"_Ie�,_` j LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING co 163 123 04 P� rks /�(/ � OCCUPANT 5032 DUNBAR AVE*A HUNTINGTO1 1 C 927 om i S,/OS `70 RL N S L -P VACANT UN94BLE TO FORIWARD MC: 92640019090 A.9, 0 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach fir, nt- Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 C' t Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CL1-1 011"I"r LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 123 20 Y4 OCCUPANT 5132 DUNBAR AVE 4B /V O� J( ,/� HUNTINGTON N X"I C osi�2s�09 R C T U P?N 'T 0 SX-N D 1Z R Ar"AN T 6 �,., ` �, ��,ra"`�r'`�` ��: MC; 92e400;19090 *20'77-091 0�2-Z5 4 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk • City of Huntington Beach U 11.17 4 Office of the City Clerk T n, P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ;A Y S P""'Z'l A'Jz' LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING .• a n d 163 123 20 C2 OCCUPANT 5132 DUNBAR AVE#C1 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 /// VVV C �. NIX m M SIC47 00 Rp.,.,ruqN TO SCNOCR ',/ACANT UNASLE TO FORIWARD MC 92S4C1019090 1*2077 03:10:3--25-25 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk v 9 City of Huntington Beach L Office of the City Clerk 00,A P.O. Box 190 Q Huntington Beach, CA 92648 POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 123 18 OCCUPANT 5122 DUNBAR AVE#C1 HUNTINGTON BF' d l Nm X I C'. ls'.Z' DU 1 00 RE.'TURN TO ',.iACANT WNAMLC' TO FORWARD �-- ` 1-- ����-c�rr�x�t���; �F�S��5�.1�C� litl,l�>11111111,1,>111,11it„11„111,1„ll,,,l,l„I11,1111,i1 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk =n 012 H, ",Q 9 City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 u m ZZ T P LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING #7 1 OrIT 163 123 18 OCCUPANT 5122 DUNBAR AVE#B NOS C/19 O HUNTINGTO�' S 2 7 DS { JRETURN TO S'ENDER ACNT pip V UNAeLE TOA r0R)OARD — 9 215 1 30 1 90 90 *2 0 7 7-0 1"D1 0 1 -25-2-56 II zIII111))11HIIIJ1 ItIIIIIIIIII")J)dII)MIJI Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 114 Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 U Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Z tS POST"GE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING P" 163 123 20 OCCUPANT IV Of 5132 DUNBAR AVE#B1 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 C J Fd:L ?�_: SO 7 RETI-JRN 'TO SENDER `-14 PC AN 17, par QNAMI-a TO FOPWARO Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach J Office of the City Clerk S 0 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 f 7N,4 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 123 18 OCCUPANT e'i�lane 5122 DUNBAR AVE#B1 HUNTINGTf-11,1 Mr:Af-W I-A 09f;AQ C � �az;��.� �H`� Utz a. �5c� �::��::=�:.�cs RETUR N TO SENOER VACANT up4r4st-i: 190 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk o 12 41 9 City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk $00 A 14 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 2(41a0ed F�cnr, 5 us P0 3TAGE LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING pT NO 16312320 OCCUPANT 5132 DUNBAR AVE#D HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 pap 00 031J f;�:S,i 0S CIS I RETURN 'TO S1:NDr-R V PIC ANT UNAML.C' 'TO FORWARD *2077-09,104--.25-25 '190 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach j?;- 0 12 6 L Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 12320 C9 OCCUPANT 5132 DUNBAR AVE#C No J` " O HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 00 OS/2's./os CR) RETURN 'TO -SMNDF"R VACANT ' /Id UNAE!4L[� 'TO FORIdARO Mc: 92154e019090 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk ,r,� 4 � City of Huntington Beach 4 Office of the City Clerk 6,- Q, p 'k_ a P.O. Box 190 � n Huntington Beach, CA 92648 u # hwrxy • -, s pi 4. LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 121 48 OCCUPANT 5151 DUNBAR AVE#E 1v 116 HUNTINGTO" 0CA-t-3 A nnc.n \ , par �q IX S" ra�27 01Z 1 00 0S./�_"Sjl;09 (V ` �c`c`� `:'`� �► �j190 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 2,HzR City of Huntington Beach e Office of the City Clerk rf ` . P.O. Box 190 r_ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 s - e LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING �x C9163 123 07 ' OCCUPANT �,sr er p HUN D NBARGTON' AVE#A CR) HUNTINGTf�n, RGenu re AoreA ERETURN TO 'T Oh�`TPqrks /�(e �„ I �,,,, /'�} (� ��� : <.��e.;�a-�oi��a�:� *�o7~r--��a•r•�-gas-�..5 9 0 9 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach ED Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 US PGISTA'1'1"'k- LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 123 19 OCCUPANT 5112 DUNBAR AVE#A1 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 N I X I S 927 ot: 1 09 RETURN TO SMNOER VACANT 1 ����c~rs �� <:; � ` UNADI-E TO FORWARD 926,40019090 *2077-09097-25-2-s 190 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 2"M City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk M IkRF 7 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 c�Rd 7T -6Z lj'�) yak A LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING �r �� � 163 123 11 NO OCCUPANT 5102 DUNBAR AVE#C HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 RETURN TO SENDER v AC ANT UNAeLC TO FORWARD OC: 925400:19090 *2077-09096-25-25 i a 0 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 11 City of Huntington Beach E I Office of the City Clerk o P.O. Box 190 " 'µl w = Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ju, 0, r iJ-5 POSTAGE L NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING n Nd163 12322 ,) OCCUPANT ��� � 5152 DUNBAR AVE#B ° HUNTIN' --.. —. Aiz" LI_ :--"7 RETURN TO S.ENDCR ',)ACANT MC: 912F4£3019090 kjj20.7 "T— j090 93—:.j�'.5 25 1 11i1>>}I}I Mfillj }1} 1f}1111}11t}11j181�}11R1}il}�}iil4}}}31}1� Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 2H IE , 9 2 City of Huntington Beach ; Office of the City Clerk .y P.O. Box 190 5 ' s Huntington Beach, CA 92648 M; POSTAGE E LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING m 163 123 21 f� OCCUPANT r}ta+A N • 5142 DUNBAR AVE WE tiUNTINGTON " CIV�( J 415'.4:ZE� 9127 SM L Fo r ks I'd QNALtjLE TO FORWARD 6 / 0C i;.42640019090 *2077-0901922525 �9 2 it(P0190 1111}11th)JI1}tIt>II}1111I,}1}tIII31111111)11111}111111}I}II Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach R 0 Office of the City Clerk < M 00 Q _j At 4, P.O. Box 190 0 51,2 2 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 iz S (D IS, LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 939 543 76 972 Francisca Kim 5096 Tortuga Dr#201 Huntington Beach CA 92649 X 9 F 23 27 NE I SOSI 00 OS/ JO9 Ck) FORWARD TIME EXP5 R,rN 'TO SCNO KIM'FRANCISCA 1,71si 00POINA LN Apr 106 H1,JNTIN07N E)CH CA 92649-5,150 RETURN TO SENDER Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 0 1_2 162 0 9'c City of Huntington Beach W Office of the City Clerk I. 4t 'T P.O. Box 190 r 1,7 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 wo"WK-N- , �t 11,�Sl LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 03 939 543 74 970 Brady Kooiman C? 5096 Tortuga Dr#103 Huntington Beach CA 92649 )e 927 NFF_ 1 4001 00 OS/20/09 FOR'kk)(_)Rr.) TIME-. E:-,,<P RTN TO SEND KOOlMnWEDRADY ,a/ � J � D OS27 WOODPE-CKER ST Pctrgslae DREA CA 92620106,4 RCTURN TO SFNDF-rR Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 702H16 "P" City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk Q P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 % rX fX, &4, 3 LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING -TT 163 11401 309 Michael Ward 17132 NO , � _ o ) �< Huntin( roRwARD TXMr 1:XP ITN TO SEND WARD SS17 N SENITA H11-1-S AVE C MERIDIAN 10 00646_50�37 Pq r s RETURN TO SENDER 6 / ©�r,��:, c , � - 11 Mh I I ilk)Mhll Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach A� 4 -f 1H, K, J - Office of the City Clerk X P.O. Box 190 - ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 7i ' F,CD53T A LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING 939541 17 713 Neil Ruggiero 5032 Dorado Dr#106 Huntington Beach CA 92649 92-7 NFF_ :1 0091 00 05/123109 FORWARD TXMC CXP RTN TO SEND RUGGIEROINEIL A 102 TRANXILO ST ART �402 4/) yA�,)UNINr GU ge:,9,10-0404 sRETURN TO SENDER ®9�xSAw*9qc_>c*o, II'l—J, Ill I 1)111)111 11 1 ill 111111111 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach ? " Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 ` � TM Huntington Beach CA 92648 17 r I've LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING 't 939 542 79 875 . . Christine Stempleski �'rse+ 5101 Tortug NCO O Huntington E X 927 NNE s. 5091. 00 1 FORWARD TIME C.XP RTN TO SEND 1 ZnTE:MPL.1rS.K:I '' taHRISTINV A ARPi..E 'TC:rhl IJ:C 11,49:1.1 -•39:14 RETURN TO SENDER (J l Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk� City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ` .FArF LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING 939 542 47 843 Margaret Diane Stewart ® 17151 Corbina Ln #112 Huntington Beach CA 92649 J i`Ort4,J6'iRD TIME RTN TO SEND ST EWART `v'Al._LEY CENTER EGA 9.'d08Me--:1 89 RETURN TO SENDER 6 � l 04,, 14 Jill M)1,1,11)1)1),11„1,11„)„e Jill III 11,>>1,1,I11M))Jill Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ,1'^s. � f sk r P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �� � r � �" ' �n x .. .� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 939 541 85 781 Curtis Heitkamp i NO, (lam17172 Abalone Ln ''�` o / Huntington Beach x �B27 ��►"f= l ic��sx Uri c�-5✓�,::3/o:� r"O�t�wARD TIME I XP RT'N `TO SEND 1 HE_Y'TbCAPP tv:lJf�T:I: L 1200 LING OR UNIT 107 MT PL_E'f=tSAN7 .�.tiC '29464-•479:1 v\ RETURN 'ro s NDEF2 / •� D ��w�-PA opos( , Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 6RX. Office of the City Clerk _ M P.O. Box 190 f Huntington Beach, CA 92648 412� � R LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 1 � e - ( ? 163 191 29 440 z�w �„� , I Alfredo Santana 17472 Bellport r:- `�� Huntington Bea HONTiNa tlAL_J tOS4S GENT>._EY l_N 6 RE TURN T a SENDER a �ra�,'r� �� 11,1��„1,l,I1,,,4„4{„1, ':Joan 6'2 9 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk C' Y City of Huntington Beach W-j Office of the City Clerk V OUA I P.O. Box 190 E W- Huntington Beach, CA 92648 j Ti A GAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Jean Kimbrell c/o E.T.I. Corral loo NO, 20292 Eastwood CIL Huntington Beach,C,1 0 EZ I OS1127/00 F?V'TURN TO SENDFR NOT DEL-I'VERAGI-Er AS UNAMLETO FORWARD Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk *1-4401! City of Huntington Beach WRY- Office of the City Clerk A";- P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 -A LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 939541 39 735 Daniel Sparks 5031 Dorado Dr Not Huntington Beact X 927 NFE 1� 2001 00 OS/23/01-73 PORWARO YIME E-XP verN To SEND SpARKSIDANIEL .521 F-)A}-)AXONE ST ART ;1OF �JONOLULU H1 96925-1424 RETURN TO SENDER Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk t--- vw qql� 2, City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk $10",At i 4 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 a: 0: JS POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING and C? 939 543 51 947 NO C/1 Harold Towers Jr. 43104 W Sui C 1 �; �.Maricopa AZ FORWA'15M TMME-Z' E`,,XFD R'T'N TO So "r() C rq SJ76 I'OFT"T'0CW'.) C)FP AP'T 104 i--JUN'T'1NGTN D(oi--i CA 9!24�49-5't 71 9264000190 1 1 M I)I J)I I I I I I I I I I 11) 1 11 11) 1 11 11111 1 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ix P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 p LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING �u V, 163 131 24 377 ALTIC PROP LLC 4639 Tremont Li Corona Del Mar N -X 1:-: 927 1 D E 1 00 0,5/27/09 RE;rURN r -TO Srw.ND1ZR N0,T AS nDORrSSF-O UNAGLE 'TO FORWARD 92640019090 *2077-04994-27-25 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 4- v - , City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk E A A mi �I P.O. Box 190 U, 7M Huntington Beach, CA 92648 `,JS POSTAIGZ TICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 12319 p'�/ t Occupant 5112 Dunbar Ave Huntington BE WX RETURN TO ZIC914DEM 1NsUF7f1C1E:N'r ACICIRCS-Is UNAnL.C. TO rOPWARD Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 121 21 THIS IS, A MULTI-UNIT ADDRESS �f Occupant ED TO 4i 5131 Dunbar Ave Alu I L'i Mi) 1L MUST BE ADDRES"") Huntington t% "IC PAPT. OR UNIT NUNIBER C �, 0M*7 ICE_ It 00 0!5. 25 j 0 RETURN TO ISENDER 6 `- C `-� �� `��``� `������`���.�� 11,1„>,f,l,li,,,l„li„i,li,,,,,,lii,i„ll,,,i,l„li,>,,,1,11 PQ JA ,�S e INSUFFICIENT ADDRES'S UNAI-BLV TO FORWARD 92540019090 *2077-065-51-25-2-5 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 0 1 2H IF,,2 0 C". City of Huntington Beach A A Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 264E., P 0 STA'13 E L L NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING P 74 163 12307 Occupant 5062 Dunbar Ave Huntingtc- o c fA 110CACI a� 0 INSURC:TUN TO SENDER FFICZENTP k s UMAML.CTO FORWARD EBC : 9.2-1640019090 *2 0 7 7--0 6,6 517—25 2!; (9 211;4 mcfg:i 9 0 1 ll IIIIII Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 6: City of Huntington Beach C .j. jl Office of the City Clerk f"�aA A, -4 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 o'w 'A US P C,"S 1 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING /V Oo 99 C, V1, 0 0 1 dT1 3 11 Occupant �� "10'� I'' 5102 Dunbar Ave Huntington Bea,- —09 N )il I C S27 OU 0sy tzes'i 09 RMTURN TO SCNOER INsurpzcir-wr Ac)oRL!,s's UNADLE TO FORWARD So Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach WoK � Office of the City Clerk x Ur' .. �i. i _ P.O. Box 190 cr Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ' � .. E""�.,�"�a k�,�tl.n LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING I ^ MUST ID� AC`��dESSLD TO t, 'ECI IC APT. OR UNIT � ''j; D ELIVERABLE RETUR&% R �L S ,, rao►. 5082 Dunbar Me 6 — Huntington Beach 7.1.7 TEE i a27 LrT�J t to � RETURN TO SENDER 9 190 1I,Ir,,,I,I,lir„Ir,II„i,Ilrr„raIII,Ir,I1r,;I,I„II,P,r,I,II Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk YHuntington k a Cit of Beach ti a Office of the City Clerk ._ �.0 TO g. � P.O. Box 190 - NUMBER, °'"� ° i �r Huntington Beach, CA 92648 � Eke N TU SENDER and LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING e 163 123 10 9 / Occupant IVO ){ / 5092 Dunbar Ave Huntington F-- J raEa'rFZCURN EN AE.�aDR f3C •.L># t :i Sa�C� q `*2077-08,541--2-1-5 -2.5 �=rs ��t tom, es:��� IIrI:,t,I,IrII,r,I,,II„I,II,„r,,III,I„IIr III I„III HHIII) Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 "° ` Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �VhWe4,From §, US POSTACE- LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING NO> � � l 6 P ! j il, 16 i t ,'' 4 r �V' t 17171 Harbor Bluffs Cir Huntington W.1'X I CE .�' '7 ES : 3 tit Ural::�>3 i:�':e RETURN 'TO SENDER t'r='r:' .rk` 2 e ` �Ses 11,1,,,,1,1,11,,,1„ll„1,11,,,,,,111,1„ll,,,l,lf,ll,,,HIM Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk ° City of Huntington Beach Ow o" i' 'x A, A Office of the City Clerk ' P.O. Box 190 r Huntington Beach, CA 92648y N u: LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING l �p 'ii-,iS 1S A WaL?I-UNIT AUilv� 'SS 163 123 08 ® 1 ALL MAIL MUS1 vE ADDfiES ED (�Rcupant 72 Dunbar Ave Rip F, , E ; l L,� .�;�„c.L; �r;,:t ��t1j,;�� �i, ��iH�urangton Beach CA 92649 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk $ 0' A P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 F"i'D S1 A 3 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING V IPT OR jpj! F o 163131 14 P)Z E RET0111V Occupant 69 17151 Harbor Bluffs Cir - � Huntington /Vol q - O / 14D.*27 'D C -1 00 OS11 09 RETURN TO SENOEP INSUFT"MCIENT 1JNAE31..C- TO FORWARD C 6 4 43 019 09, 0 Nk',2 07 7 0 6 5 2 6 2 9 0 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 9 9' City of Huntington Beach A A Office of the City Clerk j P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 T A G LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEART �� �� �, 163 131 15 SLiL;-c, Occupant L9 17161 Harbor Bluffs Cir Huntington C 927 IMF._ 1 rho 0 S./12 15 0 9 Rr--"ruRN ro s.mNw�:F; �.o (� INSUF714-211ENT ADr)pr--,Ss UNAMLE, TO r"OR1.1)ARD DC'. 912,5400-19090 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 12, City of Huntington Beach " Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 t t �a Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �� �,� 'GP-,a LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING .• , ��l1LTl-tJN�T t. Y(' 'I-;' T �E ADC 163 131 12 T. 0 $ Ut'EIT llit Occupant . .h L 17131 Harbor Bluffs Cir Huntington Bead V D ` S S 0._ NF:'1 Uh?N -ro sr,.Nocp BC: 92lei400.190490 A,20.77-_OSS24_.21!%__.;c Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk ,e,^ City of Huntington Beach ' E 163 2 ,. � . Office of the City Clerk Le 74 f P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 US POSTAGE' LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING M1JLTI-UNIT 4DVESS -!ST 3E ADDRESSED TD ® 163 131 13 0 "? ®tH UNIT I i,j 9Occupant DER, C./ �,LE R TURN TD 17141 Harbor Bluffs Cir , i ( Huntington Beach CA 92649 1 ray: :tom 912 7 Dr- 1 00 DS,/12S Y tr5O J RCTUR N 'T0 s:MNn ER 1N,S1JFr1C1EMT ADDRESS UA+iAMLF "#°t»a FORWARD —25--25 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk y v y City of Huntington Beach U; w P Office of the City Clerk C UU, P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 X Z M'110�"�7FCIM tjS POSTA"'E LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 12304 C9 Occupant 5032 Dunbar Ave ,r rase A JD � / Huntington Beach CA 92649 I C 9 VR7 rAz I oc> RMTURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDR)EM-SS LJNAsLt "ram rowwApm BIC. 92640019090 2-!s Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 0 2 a il 6,2,CD 9 93,2 City of Huntington Beach V 40 � Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 IW4 A q Huntington Beach, CA 92648 "S" 1E, LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 12306 4 O PI Occupant i lit 5052 Dunbar Ave NO , Huntington Beach Wl'Y"I S 927 0 U, I 0-ISIP:.i:40so ERE:-rURN 'To XNSUFFICXrNT AODRESS' UNASLEZ TO FORWARD de IMC: 9264001,909ro *2077-06656 2 5—2 5 " H 3 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 12 1(-2 0'9 9 City of Huntington Beach < Office of the City Clerk -j . $00, 1 P.O. Box 190 20lu" Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,.ts POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING MIS IS A MULTI-UNIT ADDRESS 1, MAIL Fc MUST ADDRESSED TO L'T. 0. R f-ITT I�JUY�)Ff, C,L i T 163 121 28 332 �ENI" PA Sylvia Sahagian 1 5041 Dunbar Ave '„r� ,aai , � ^ � � O � Huntington 00 CIS/ 09 RFTURN TO SENDER jNsjuFr- XC1[Z:NT ADDRESS PQ r k tJ\ /J ,�? UNADLE TO PORWARD mc: 92540019090 25 9Ne-424icl 0319 0 11 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk :Ve 4 City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 *QA1— Z, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 U1116IRWIlf"Mo-zo,r A,ME LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING C2 P� 163 121 29 Occupant 5021 Dunbar,^--- Huntington Be 9127 ri C 1 00 0-%1'1j2-X,-j09 RETURN S EN D C INSUFF-ICIENT ADDRESS QNAML-E TO PORWARD MC- s26400-19090 2 0'77--0 f.;6"s 4-2 5_2-5 tjq :zreo;llt;;L 9 0 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 12; 16 20 City of Huntington Beach At Office of the City Clerk 00,414', P.O. Box 190 co 5 2 1 0,C)2 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CL i LIS PrOSTAGE- Z Z LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING 163 121 26 C9 Occupant 5071 Dupkor Awo /V Huntingtoi �4 11:7 G OV. I RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNAMLE: TO FORWARD Parks Id-e Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk —p"' City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 'M X U, LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING fi QnJ 163 12127 Occupant 5051 Dunbar Ave o Nis �� _ �� Huntington RETURN TO SENDER CR) :ZNSUFF1CXCNT A0Cj1PE'-!:-'S UNAMLE TO FORWARD CC : 9. 264001903- 0 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk � M rr r City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 4- P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �t' rFla a STAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING �,m a e � 163 121 24 Occupant U 5101 DunbarA-•- yy�� Huntington Bea Nr c /a �a:`r.7 L`at:. i Clio INSUFFICIENT ADDRE-SS U NAMI-P. TO F'CzK?WARO ECG:: 912 64;0019090 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190P, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 � � LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING s a I? - - - 163 121 26 OCCUPANT Fso � 5071 DUNBAR AVE#D Or HUNTINGTON BE - ' , 9 RETURN TO SENCIER Q 0 � ! rN:suraLC €era°r ORWA�:D iJ)N�+�31_£E TO r���.�� ta t 9326400:1909 0 ` 2077._066 0-:.2.5 -25 Joan L. Flynn, City ClerkA Ix; City of Huntington BeachOff �� , Office of the Cit Clerk , ' Y44 .i �. 00A. P.O. Box190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �� ` .1 wx 9 6. r and LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING e : 7 163 121 49 "fe.;Far9c�* Occupant 17061 Leslie Ln Hunting each ton B 6 93'SX:IE= S'$'`G`i Y_'itr i veXNSUFFICIMN'T ADDRESS fit c:srt�� �9 3.9 0 JIM III IIII„MIIII Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 1psr Huntington Beach, CA92648 Y h LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 12206 Occupant :'r'a' G 7 • n/ 17062 Leslie i e / � Huntington B( CR ) UNAML.r- TO FOR)OW;M le Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 3 i �41 W ff Office of the City ClerkZv °. P.O. Box 190y :p . ... v . .. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING � 3 and 163 131 24 OCCUPANT } say 17172 BOLSA CHICA Sr2649 N�o ^- «.. ,/} HUNTINGTON BEACH RE:'TLJQN TO SM—NDE'R E-,VACANT 1.�® � ` J���Ei.'L.k: 'TO FORWARDDC; 026400:19090 Joan L. Flynn, City ClerkkA ' City of Huntington Beach ' Office of the City Clerk ") A P.O. Box 190 ` Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING nOM 163 131 24 OCCUPANT 17172 BOLSA CHICA ST #29 HUNTINGTOr' ^n rnL2 A tt// 0 666 (J /fib f �) rl00 0C 1 00 O SJ CIO/09 jk CTO t 'AN T UNAML-C 'TO FORWARD 9 s e 4 0 0:14 I D 9 0 - �a hJ1111I,1,II,,,I„II„l,il,,,,,,il1,i„11,„1,I,�i! ,,,,IIH Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk C7 b, City of Huntington Beach (jtj 4j Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Y D S LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163281 06 OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#48 D m 6 D A HUNTINGTC" - "TUR�,� TO SENDCR VACANT UNAMLE TO FOPWARD mc: 92640019090 koslo-0:5-264—DO-A 4 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 1 City of Huntington Beach z Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Js LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 4 Q 163 131 24 OCCUPANT 17172 BOLSA CHICA ST#48 HUNTINGTOf ® N.1 X1 C' 909 ter~ I ctio 0S/1zs0J09 RETURN TO VACANT UNAMILM TO FORWARD Ill - 69 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk � F City of Huntington Beach r k Office of the City ClerkOU .,` P.O. Box 190P s 'r T-i Huntington Beach, CA 92648 mopa LEGAL NOTICE — PU LIC HEARING 163 12 06 OCCU ANT fig•"17 411 17062 ESLI LN *A HUNT ,GT N B �a mac-;AN�r pqr � U9^dX4GL.F '710 F"OF?0.,AF?0 ���„/// 1����:�'t�k�'�'"�`��e``'�� I{{III I{Illillalillill{ililltlaliilllalttlllil!{I!!I{tlt41l1II Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach `° u Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 , Huntington Beach, CA 92648i. � ''� • ma's � r �e - L GAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING 163 281 06 (� OCCUPANT tit✓✓✓ ® 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#130 ?: Q� HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 VACANT 43AdA.E.LE TO 1="C.JX341f'RD Iltlt,t,lIM1)fill Jill tltlltttt,,Ilitlttllt)III ltmtt,ltltll Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach �Y �� Y;� �$_ � Office of the City Clerk r � i P.O. Box 190 E' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 M' LEGAL NOTICE - PUKK� EARING n 163 1 CC 21 21 326 P�r�'C /0 see^;,raa �' ` ✓ pi63121 Yerema � S 00 unbar ^��� un ington Bi NmXIle e90U DE: 1 C)c sj:3t)j£35 RETURN 'TO SCWDER UNCLAIMCD UNADLE' 'TO FORWARD MC s 9264E301905 :*0610--0:51 )fib;1-- 30-1 4 �:wG.��}��:1.'�� iJ{Jli{lil JlJ-l11{l1,JJliJ1JJ){1):1!liiiilJlltIJIJI)JJ„1){J1J1 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach �1 = 15 ��� � °^t t .�#x ;t Office of the City Clerk ; . P.O. Box 190 ° - Huntington Beach, CA 92648 41 �j... % Is r/"'. LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Huntington I larbor POA 1(1 P. C). Box 791 Fe�''i7 180f F� ♦ - �' 11v o Sunset Beach, CA 90742 pq }-)UI+dT IAdG7h} E3C)-} GA ;3 26'Y{a-I E 0Es Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk fA20993 2 City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk � " t` s P.O. Box 190 „ ' 5 Huntington Beach, CA 926484 ; POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING tt7 939 542 01 k 1 ccupant 1 172 Abalone 9210��. p�►�1 ks ; Huntingtor ^^ ^ NZY,IM (DCe DIT- 1 00 095/ sC/09 RETURN 70 SENDER VACANT Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach x � Office of the City Clerk `a , P.O. Box 190 OF1a .. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING l cm IN eIr939 541 26 Ear Occupant NO , Yg 0 5032 Dorado Dr#111 Huntington E RS-TURN TO VACANT 9 9284000190 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk �ti. City of Huntington Beachg , 4 Al PC Office of the City Clerk 4 w k ,p � #,, , P.O. Box 190 r Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ' ` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 939 4259 -�7 ,gat '��° Occu ant 97199 Corbina I. # 4 ' 41 Hunting n Be R E;'1'LJ ?N VA C A T IS I I to Y7 UraAC:LF;: TO FORWARD Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk � City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ..r P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ACyam. 'F ytg r k LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING _ 939 542 63 ® Occupant 17191 Corbina Ln #108 a Q ® Huntington Beach ^" - l NIX2C 00 05/00/09 TO sr-NDER ks I'Ve UNAOLC TO rORWARD Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk ., City of Huntington Beach p Office of the City Clerk # _ m, Oil, P.O. Box 190 ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 STAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING e _ 939 541 75 Occupant NO ?� — O/ 5071 Dorado Dr#112 a Huntington BPar-h (.A Q*)neQ RETURN CA TEc)JTDE`F? I N T 1.1N�7E,YL_E 'TO FORWARD •e„ ( ti OC: Et26400.1 9090 4'0 6 10--05:0.2 2--30 A 4 �?.��3�FJt?{:t'3,�C7 llilrrr,ltlrllrrrirrllrrlrllr;rrrrliirlrrllrrrlrlrrllrrrrririi Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk ¢ .. City of Huntington Beach ,y, �m .� w Office of the City Clerk = P.O. Box 190 �r y � ; Huntington Beach, CA92648 " ..,� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING C2939 541 40 !!! ��, Occupant <` 5031 Dorado Dr #105 Huntington JN IX Iv 90 a ESE= 1 00 Os/ BO/09 VACANT eJ �� IJFJ> Z)Lr TO h'OPWARD 9264000190 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk �mm � City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ': € , P.O. Box 190 F Huntington Beach, CA 92648 _.. 5v b LEGAL NOTICE - PYIBCIG�IEARTNG an C9 163 311 19 Occupant 17261 Bolsa C'hina <z+ Huntington Be; lid'.I: Xv 90F3a DE :1 00 RE-i'tJRN TO se;NMCP L11^,JAtEa_,k: TO FC7RWAf?(; %),'6 40 01 L90 9„9 r Ca :l f 7- s 1 'r''C9 i— —:14 J�4 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach � Y k g, kj Office of the City Clerk a P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING E � .� 163 281 06 OCCUPANT ` // �) 6A 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST 92 �'�'`�a raa►�`a,,' � t/ 6A �� ++ HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 � 1 Td EXIm `GCS DE 1 Cho L'1�a, ;.O./09 UNABLE O Ad"t TO FOPWARD MC; 9264e019090 A040,10-0-527,D--': C--14 Joan L. Flynn., City Clerk City of Huntington Beach cra� Xr r a Office of the City Clerk ,s A;, P.O. Box 190 w �, F, may, r Huntington Beach, CA 92648 a ` `� F LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 131 24 N o9 �- 61 Occupant 17172 BOlsa ChiCr / Huntington Beach 06J OI t r S k1S ` FCC:-f «�RN •r0 Sr2-N0E R vNDE".t__CVE=RAt�,LE A,44�'�. ApBRES 5E~rJ UNAMLIZ TO FC7F?"RD 1�4f Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk e P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA92648 AC cind LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 281 06 (� OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CH(CA ST#129 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 NO ® � � 11 z.x z 1�7, Sj D 0 DE-: a. 00 05/00 r 0 m l SENDER i E:T �� V -r A UNABLE TO FORWARD *061 a--OS..'c 9--0c,—1 4 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach tee'_ Office of the City Clerk O-Mtz s , P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 v .e LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING f I 939 42 57 Occu nt F rr ,acs. ` 17191 orbin Ln #202 OA Huntingt Bi— h ra a9Fn0 � A / l 3;?C TURN 7'C: —rF-1+JDIe R LJNt' ML.a 7*0 FORWARD 11 E� �►� c a�f�c� Ii�l, , III,,,,111,1„11,,,111,)ll,,,,,),li Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk w - � City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 31 n.. LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING s 9 163 045 10 186 a p'��' ♦ l Robert Joseph AIh^ e N O 1 17232 Greenleaf l Huntington Beach YdS:�:LE: _��'�.,? L?E= 1 007 081C3:L10°=3 ATTEMPTED -- NOT xraOwra UNAE L.E TO FORWARD III III hill„,III,I„II„,I,I„II,,,,,I,II Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk L P.O. Box 190 j Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (A LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 1-0, OCCUPANT 17122 BOLSA CHICA ST#D NO, HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 Nlxzls: DE 1 00 OSJOO/09 / g CW) F,?E;-,TLJ;?N 'TO SSENDER Mc, 92S49019090 -410SIO-05:024-30- :14 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P P.O. Box 190 Fn j, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 939541 66 Occupant 5071 Dorado Dr#107 Huntington Beach CA 92649 A/qe N IX I EZ 00 CIS/,:Dcly 09 RETURN TO ZMNDER- 6 'TO FORWARD Pqrle s A 0 5 10--c�.s-,:1,2 13--�D� 0-- -14 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk , City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 1 P.O. Box 190 x � 4 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fm u LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING l V p4 163 131 20 OCCUPANT 17142 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR#B 00 V HUNTINGTCRETURN TO SMNDER FQPkcL-,, 1"Ye - � l VACANT Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach ° y Office of the City Clerk - g . te P.O. Box 190 w' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 181 02 Occupant �� 5521 Mossvale Cir NO , 1 Huntington D Ra,ruFiN To CR vr4cAN•r UNPfaL.E~ '1'O FORWARD Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk pjW ic- City of Huntington Beach " ' Office of the CityClerk )- � ` P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 , Lh Dr, « at LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING "9, 163 281 06 LT OCCUPANT p , ^ 17171 BOLSA CHICA S #93 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 XNIXIM 0 9 D E7- 1 00 05/zIojosl litMT1 Y-hd TO �cV NDEeR VACANT UNADI—C TO FORWARD �... '�. MC: ��64�3�Ca:1�� �I,�,,,r)rlrllrr,lr;)1n)rll„r,rrlllil„Il,t,l,l,r►)rr,r,►r�) Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk � t� F � City of Huntington Beach_ Office of the City Clerk . P.O. Box 190 m� �� Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r` r M:1 LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING A-M, 163 281 06 OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#103 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA92649 d J M1111E 900 ESE 1 LSO 05✓Zwfo✓09 pq RU:TURN 'TO SENDER VACANT UNIPISI—E. 'TO FORWARD 9.26400 190 lirl,r,ri,I,1l,„I„I1„1,1),;,,,,111,1,rllr,rl,1„ll,r„rlrll Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk r;%� � - City of Huntington Beach a .„ Office of the City Clerk � � e P.O. Box 190 73 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 tj LE AL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163 281 06 OCCUPANT NO , q � ,o/ 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#23 HUNTINGTON N M`X I CAE 1 00 os/.io./09 / la ES'J' 1T�Td '70 �I�YJI9�f'v d VACANT 1JPdAM-E, TO FOA4Jr^aPD •� l �. k3t�; 3 i��* t9:1.3 t9 *0610-05.2s9--Z:10- A 6 9.��7���6J:�.�t�a r � ii3i111{i3i Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk ` _ ; P City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk } - P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LEG L NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Q4d _ 163 281 06 f d OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#24 Al HUNTINGTOV --,, 1 1 � ...--- RCTUPM TO SENDER VACANT x 0 b;t 0--0-5 21 T- o--;1 4 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk g,01 ;'v 20 S4 % T City of Huntington Beach Uj Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 -"X -"T' v ia v Eefi Z LEGAL NOTICE - C�qEAR)N G 163311 20 Occupant ' /� D / J [� T` D� 17326 Harnpfnn I Huntington & D E. 1 00 30/09 RMTURN SL M LINAMLE TO FOPWARD DC -0 6 4 0 0 19 09 0 14 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk vZ pC'- P.O. Box 190 4 -Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A"M I p. LEGAL 1111CI - PUBLIC HEARING 163281 06 p4 OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST 123 HUNTINGTON BEACH A 92649 1 00 DSX/ 30/09 �� 7 �� RE','TURN TO SEZI-40CR 6 VACANT UNAMLE TO rORWARD MC; 921$40010090 *0610--0�1270-30-14 x. Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk , �� City of Huntington Beach rt Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box190 ' ° _ F kA _. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �a 141P V� wheE v LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING r �� 163 121 48 Occupant 5151 Dunbar Ave ND s Huntington BE / x Y•-d�lJF"f"'',x C.:C E Pd T F�C3 t�F3 k:;;5+a t.JNAVAIL TZ- TO F'C?R1JAPD �,.� �--.� �;�::: �=,:�t-a..try,s7 C:,�E'd C3 3 M� �+;C3�s:1 t-�-�3�i'+��-��--1�• I , i7,11111l I11111III11{Ili lllll)1111) , {1 illli I 1 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach er, C , Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 { I� n Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ° - k9 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING • - 163 281 06 1 OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#38 HUNTINGTO� 4 1 1141 XxF- 900 DC, 1 CCU OS/Z�oj 019 _/� J Fw'M`P1.1RN TO b�1:=P*JI_C-P �s rks ! � '�Jtat::ANT UNAMLE TO FORWARD // C3ca: -3264MO�L 909 rCs s� .: �a re-14 • ���s��►�c�z�� 11,1,,,,1,1,li,,,1,,11,,1,1l,„1,llll,lolll„{l,!„1!{,,,,1,11 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerks -r 0(14 � P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 'T srK ._._ sAr3 :. LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163281 06 OCCUPANT llV�� 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST 960 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 P� a 7—Igo ; NO , 9g 0 �4 m IX I C 900 DE 1 00 015/;B10/0;s /r RETURN TO SENOMR VACANT UNADI-E TO FORWARD Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk !r City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk rc y P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 " LEGAL NOTICE - PU80C,REARONG 163 311 17 � p Occupant 4906 Shelburne Dr Huntington Bey RG.-TURN T13INsurrICIENT Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ' -j W 4 V-4 — '�01") 4 P.O. Box 190 Q 12 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ar LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 163281 06 OCCUPANT 17171 BOLSA CHICA ST#66 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 17 to 6 I'X m r;;,. DE-1. 'I wD oeljos'/09 RETURN '70 SENDE'R 34771-:MPTED - NOT k-'NOk,;�N UNASLE TO FOR14�y':)RD EDC ; 9264i30190SO k2 07 0 4 9 5-5 0 6--_2,S Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 21 City of Huntington Beach ii4i "n, Office of the City Clerk A, P.O. Box 190 & Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I-n 55 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING P4 163 131 24 OCCUPANT N 17172 BOLSA CHICA ST#72 HUNTINGTOI`- -MM X1 E wed? D S A. RE URN TO S�f'NDER popP PRDUNOLC TO oRkA41A in, City Clerk ington Beach e City Clerk _ $00-414 pox 190 each, CA 92648 r� 64 w - •. r 9 2 S POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING C2163 181 04 410 o ^ Christopher& Brenda Sthilaire 5541 Mossvale Cir S Huntington Bear CRRF:.Tk,1j;?Y,4 TO sEmr>ER EEC; 92 e4£n+019090 =*21`77-02340--20 20 C� `�k ����,� Ilt�trtalaltlltt,�t=�Irtltl�ttttttll�tltt�lttt�t�tt��attttltl�