Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPoseidon Seawater Desalination Project - 21730 Newland Coast City ®f Huntington Reach 2000 Main Street • Huntington Beach, CA 92648 o OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK JOAN L. FLYNN CITY CLERK NOTICE OF ACTION September 9, 2010 Poseidon Resources Corporation 17011 Beach Blvd., #900 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Request: EPA: To amend Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 approved by City Council in 2006 that allowed the construction and operation of a 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project. The project includes up to 10 miles of water transmission lines to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa. Two off-site underground booster pump stations and modifications to an existing booster pump station would be needed as part of this primary water transmission route. Optional water transmission line routes and pump stations are also proposed that would convey water northerly. TPM: To subdivide three parcels totaling ±19.5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project. Applicant: Poseidon Resources Corporation, 17011 Beach Blvd., #900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Property Owners: AES HB, LLC, 21730 Newland St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646; City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main St., Huntington Beach, CA 92648; Various for off-site improvements Location: 21730 Newland Street (east side, south of Edison Avenue) On Tuesday, September 7, 2010, the Huntington Beach City Council took action on your request and approved Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 to permit the Seawater Desalination Project with findings and conditions of approval (attached). In addition, following receipt of a communication from the California Coastal Commission it was determined that the new Poseidon project proposal and accompanying Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 currently in process with the City will require a new Coastal Development Permit. Therefore, Council voted in favor of continuing TPM No. 10-130 Sister Cities: Anjo, Japan ® Waitakere, New Zealand (Telephone: 714-536-5227) to September 20, 2010, and to conduct a new public hearing to consider a request for a new Coastal Development Permit at that time. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner at (714) 536-5624. Sincerely, Joan L. Flynn, CIVIC City Clerk Attachments: Pages 4-5 of the City Council Action Agenda for September 7, 2010 Findings and Conditions of Approval for EPA 10-001 c: AES HB, LLC, 21730 Newland St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Scott Hess, Director of Planning and Building Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner 2. Approve and adopt minutes Recommended Action: Approve and adopt the minutes of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority regular meeting of August 2, 2010 as written and on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Approved 7-0 3. Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Union High School District (HBUHSD) regarding use of School District and City Facilities Recommended Action: Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the "Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Union High School District" regarding the use of School District and City Facilities. Approved 7-0 PUBLIC HEARINGIADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS -4-1 through 4-5 will be heard concurrently 4-1. Adopt Resolution No. 2010-63 Certifying the final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) No. 10-001 (Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project) Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 2010-63, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Certifying the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001 (SCH#2001051092) for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project" as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements." Approved as amended by late communication 6-1 (Hardy No) 4-2. Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment(EPA) No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-130 to amend Conditional Use Permit(CUP) No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 02-05 by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Recommended Action: A) Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 and Tentative Pamel Map with staff recommended findings and conditions of approval; and, B) Approve CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts with a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and, C) Continue Tentative Parcel Asap No. 10-130 to the September 20, 2010 meeting. Aa090110 Page 4 Approved as amended by late communication to include Conditions of Approval 4® related to noise attenuation 6-1 (Hardy No) 4-3. Approve the Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC Recommended Action: A) Waive the Resolution No. 214 requirement for thirty (30) day review of the Owner Participation Agreement; and, B) Approve the Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC; and, C) Authorize the Chairperson, Executive Director, and Agency Secretary to sign all related documents. Continued to the September 20, 2010 meeting- 6-1 (Hardy No) 4-4. Approve an Exchange Agreement and Escrow Instructions between the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC for properties located south of Edison Avenue and east of Newland Street Recommended Action: A) Approve an Exchange Agreement/Lease Agreement and Escrow Instructions between the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC for properties located south of Edison Avenue and east of Newland Street; and, B) Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign all related documents. Approved as amended by late communication 6-1 (Hardy No) 4-5. Approve Pipeline Franchise Agreement with Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC to construct, own, and operate a new water pipeline in the public right-of-way Recommended Action: A) Approve A Non-Exclusive Pipeline Franchise Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC for Transmitting Water In, Under, Along and Across Streets in the City of Huntington Beach; and, B) Authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to adjust the franchise fee in linear proportion to the change in pipeline diameter if the final pipeline diameter varies from the original 54-inch diameter mentioned in the agreement. Approved as amended by late communication 6-1 (Hardy No) ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION Aa090110 Page 15 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL— ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001 (AMENDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 02-04): 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 02- 04 approved by City Council in 2006 that allowed the construction and operation of a seawater desalination project by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The proposed project for the establishment, maintenance and operation of a seawater desalination project producing 50 million gallons of potable water per day which includes a 5,000 square foot administration building, 34,727 square foot reverse osmosis building, 49,481 square foot product water storage tank (30 foot high), other related accessory structures; perimeter landscaping and fencing along the project's frontage on Newland Street and Edison Avenue; and up to four miles of water transmission lines for the primary route; and optional water transmission line routes that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The project will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks to be replaced with one 30 foot high water storage tank and lower profile and modern structures with a more attractive design consistent with the city's adopted Design Guidelines. The project will further enhance the appearance of the area with the installation of 10 to 20 feet of landscaping and an eight-foot high block wall along the Edison and Newland street frontages respectively to provide additional screening and a consistent and upgraded appearance in contrast to the existing improvements. The proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses. However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts. 2. The Entitlement Plan Amendment will be compatible with surrounding uses because the project as proposed and modified by the conditions imposed and code requirements is compatible with the properties immediately surrounding it which are primarily industrial in nature. Additionally, significant setbacks including Newland Street to the west, Edison Avenue to the north, the flood control channel to the east, an existing earthen berm, 10 to 20 feet of landscaping and an eight foot high block wall along the project's Edison and Newland street frontages provide additional screening from surrounding uses. Impacts pertaining to noise, light/glare, odors, and use of chemicals are also addressed to make the project compatible. The proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses. However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts. 3. The proposed seawater desalination project including a 5,000 square foot administration building, 34,727 square foot reverse osmosis building, 49,481 square foot product water storage tank, other miscellaneous accessory structures; perimeter landscaping and fencing along the project's frontage on Newland Street and Edison Avenue; and up to four miles of 48-54 inch water transmission lines within the city for the primary route; and optional water transmission line routes that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The project as proposed and modified by the conditions of approval is consistent with the PS-0- CZ (Public-Semipublic— Oil Production Overlay—Coastal Zone Overlay) zoning district, and meets or exceeds the minimum development standards set forth therein, and is allowed subject to approval of a conditional use permit and coastal development permit. The proposed desalination facility, which will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities. 4. The granting of the Entitlement Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property because it will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, and it is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities. The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan including, without limitation, the following goals and policies: a. Policy LU 4.1.1 (page II-LU-20): Require adherence to or consideration of the policies prescribed for Design and Development in this Plan, as appropriate. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable policies related to Design and Development. b. Policy LU 4.1.2 (page 11-LU-20): Require that an appropriate landscape plan be submitted and implemented for development projects subject to discretionary review. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to submit and implement a landscape plan. c. Policy LU 4.1.6 (page II-1-U-20): Require that commercial and industrial development incorporate adequate drought-conscious irrigation systems and maintain the health of the landscape. The project is consistent with this policy because the landscape plan includes drought-conscious irrigation systems. d. Policy LU 4.2.1 (page II-LU-20): Require that all structures be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City's building and other pertinent codes and regulations; including new, adaptively re-used, and renovated buildings. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable requirements related to building codes and regulations. e. Policy LU 4.2.4 (page II-LU-20): Require that all development be designed to provide adequate space for access, parking, supporting functions, open space, and other pertinent elements. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable policies and requirements related to access, parking, supporting functions and open space. f. Policy LU 4.2.5 (page II-LU-20): Require that all commercial, industrial, and public development incorporate appropriate design elements to facilitate access and use as required by state and federal laws such as the American's with Disabilities Act. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable policies and requirements related to accessibility. g. Policy LU 5.1.1 (page I I-LU-21): Require that development protect environmental resources by consideration of the policies and standards contained in the Environmental Resources/Conservation Element of the General Plan and federal (NEPA) and state (CEQA) regulations. During the development review process: (a) Review any development proposal for the Bolsa Chica area, Huntington Beach wetlands, and throughout the City to ensure that no development is permitted in federally delineated wetlands; and (b) Review any development proposed for non-wetland areas to ensure that appropriate setbacks and buffers are maintained between development and environmentally sensitive areas to protect habitat quality. The project is consistent with this policy because it does not propose any development in or adjacent to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitats, and provides for all required setbacks and buffers. h. Policy LU 7.1.1 (page II-LU-22): Accommodate existing uses and new development in accordance with the Land Use and Density Schedules. The project is consistent with this policy because it is consistent with the General Plan Land Use and Density Schedules. i. Policy LU 7.1.2 (page 11-LU-22): Require that development be designed to account for the unique characteristics of project sites and objectives for community character and in accordance with the Development "Overlay" Schedule (Table LU-3) as appropriate. The project is consistent with this policy because it is proposed on a site that is already developed and is integrated into the site. Pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. j. Policy LU 7.1.5 (page II-LU-22): Accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that maintain the City's fiscal viability and integrity of environmental resources. The project is consistent with this policy because it proposes redevelopment on underutilized land for productive economic use. k. Policy LU 13.1.8 (page II-LU-43): Ensure that the City's public buildings, sites, and infrastructure improvements are designed to be compatible in scale, mass, character, and architecture with existing buildings and pertinent design characteristics prescribed by this General Plan for the district or neighborhood in which they are located, and work with non-City public agencies to encourage compliance. The project is consistent with this policy because the project will be an improvement by demolishing three 40 foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. 1. Policy UD 2.1.1 (Page 11-UD-27): Require that new development be designed to consider coastal views in its massing, height, and site orientation. The project is consistent with this policy because the project plans include a number of measures to minimize adverse visual effects of the proposed facility. The facility would be comprised of relatively low profile buildings reaching approximately 35 feet above the existing grade, which would comply with applicable zoning code height restrictions of 50 feet. The overall appearance would be similar to a commercial office building. As part of the facility design, both vegetative and architectural screening has been added to ensure that exposed pipelines, tanks, and other utility-type equipment are screened from public view. The project would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect existing public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. In addition, the project would replace three existing dilapidated fuel oil storage tanks with contemporary structures, which would improve the site's aesthetic character and result in a beneficial impact. m. Policy CE 7 (Page III-CE-26): Maintain and enhance the visual quality and scenic views along designated corridors. The project is consistent with this policy because there are limited views across the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) site due to the height of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished. n. Policy ERC 4.1.5 (Page IV-ERC-25): Promote the preservation of public view corridors to the ocean and the waterfront through strict application of local ordinances, design guidelines and related planning efforts, including defined view corridors. The project is consistent with this policy because it would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. o. Policy AQ 1.8.2 (Page IV-AQ-15): Require installation of temporary construction facilities (such as wheel washers) and implementation of construction practices that minimize dirt and soil transfer onto public roadways. The project is consistent with this policy because it is subject to mitigation measures that control dispersal of soil as a result of construction activities. p. Policy EH 1.2.1 (Page V-EH-24): Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand ground shaking and liquefaction such as stated in the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all appropriate and applicable building standards related to ground shaking and liquefaction. q. Policy N 1.2.2 (Page V-N-6): Require new industrial and new commercial land uses or the major expansion of existing land uses to demonstrate that the new or expanded use would not be directly responsible for causing ambient noise levels to exceed an exterior Ldn of 70 dB(A) on areas containing "noise sensitive" land uses as depicted on Figure N-1. The project is consistent with this policy because it will be required to adhere to all applicable noise restrictions established by the City. r. Policy HM 1.1.4 (Page V-HM-7): Implement federal, state, and local regulations for the handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. The project is consistent with this policy because it includes appropriate and adequate controls for the handling, storage, and use of hazardous materials. The project will be an improvement to the area because it will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. There are limited views across the Huntington Beach 'Generating Station (HBGS) site due to the height of the existing structures. However, ,views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished. The project is required to provide a 10 foot (Edison) and 20 foot (Newland) landscape planter along.the perimeter of the site to enhance the appearance of the area. These landscaping improvements are required to be consistent with the approved landscaping improvements for the rest of the HBGS property to the south for a cohesive appearance. The proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses. However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001: 1. The site plans, floor plans, elevations, and landscaping plan received and dated August 12, 2010 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The landscape area on the east side of the project site on Parcel 3 shall include the removal of all Myoporum, and shall be planted with a palette of plants indigenous to the Southern California coastal community. b. Provide a patio along the front entrance of the administration building. (DRB) c. Provide landscape planters around the administration building. (DRIB) d. Provide screening for the solids loading area and filter substation compatible with the project. (DRB) e. Provide screening to the top of the chemical storage, carbon dioxide, and flush tanks. (DRB) f. The landscaping plan shall reflect plant materials that are more mature than the minimum code requirements subject to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. (DRIB) g. The applicant shall install landscaping on Parcel 2 along Newland and Edison to match the project for a consistent appearance. h. The landscaping and wall plan shall;be consistent in design, colors, and materials with the landscaping and wall plan for AES for a cohesive appearance. i. The landscaping along the Newland and Edison lease area street frontages shall include the densest type and number of trees to provide the most effective screening possible and shall be maintained to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. j. A perimeter block wall shall be constructed along the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility/Poseidon boundary, per Public Works Department requirements. (PW) k. Buildings of the subject project may not cross property lines. Lot lines shall be adjusted at the proposed treatment facility accordingly. (PW) I. Revise 36"-42" City Pipeline Stub to 18"-36" City Pipeline Stub. (PW) m. Tree species planted along Edison Street shall not canopy over the street to avoid blocking large maintenance vehicles accessing the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility. (CS) 2. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the following shall be completed: For the demolition of the three (3) 200 foot diameter fuel oil tanks, a work plan must be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to commencement of work. (FD) 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, thefollowing shall be completed: a. The applicant shall submit written proof of final project approval by each applicable regulating agency including but not limited to the California Coastal Commission, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District and all applicable water agencies and cities. b. The required Precise Grading Plan shall include the following: (PW) 1) Extension of the existing 8-inch diameter City sewer main in Edison Avenue easterly to the terminus of said street. 2) Connection to the existing 8-inch sewer main along the adjacent property's northerly property line (also southerly of the existing Orange County Flood Control District's right-of-way) shall be prohibited. c. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant will enter into a Franchise agreement approved and executed by the City for the generation and transport of product water from the site, and through and across the city's streets, rights-of- way or properties. (PW) (MC 3.44) d. A separate (new) irrigation water service and meter installed per Water Division Standards, and sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the landscape irrigation demand and the Water Efficient Landscape Requirements (MC 14.52) the minimum size shall be 1". (PW) e. The proposed 30" tank overflow line shall be prohibited from surface discharging directly into the public right-of-way. (PW) f. Areas for containment shall be provided to mitigate possible spillage of any materials affecting storm water quality that may be stored on-site, and to protect the adjacent wetlands to the maximum extent feasible. (PW) 4. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. A Water Purchase Agreement shall be executed between the applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project and the City of Huntington Beach and shall incorporate the following: (PW) 1) The City will have the option (the "Option") to enter into a water purchase agreement ("Water Purchase Agreement") to purchase water from the Project on terms essentially the same as all of the other water purchase agreements for the Project; provided, however that the City's price for up to 3,360 acre- feet per year (3 million gallons per day or 4.6 cubic feet per second) of the water purchased from the Project will be equal to the combination of(1) a 5% discount on the purchase price of water supplied by MWD via the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and (2) any subsidy received by the City from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California or any other third party for the purchase of water from the Project such as, but not limited to, MWDOC; and provided further that the City's price will not exceed the purchase price for Project water in the other water purchase agreements for the Project. 2) The City will have the first right to purchase up to an additional 4,000,000 gallons per day (6.1 CFS) of additional water from the Project during a declared water emergency at the same costs as above for not to exceed seven days in any 30 day period and not to exceed 28,000,000 gallons in any one emergency event.. The definition of a declared water emergency is a 50% or greater loss of overall City water supply (not including droughts) or connected facilities such as distribution system, booster stations, reservoirs, wells and imported connections causing a reduction of at least 50% of the City's water supply. c. The applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project will enter into an Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) approved and executed by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach. (EDD) d. The applicant shall conduct and submit to the Planning and Building Department an additional noise study at the project design stage and include sound level sampling at approximately 3 a.m. The applicant shall attenuate project generated noise with the intent being to avoid a perceptible increase in noise at the nearest residential property, but allowing up to a 5 dBA increase above the nighttime ambient noise levels at the nearest residential property line based on noise levels determined in the design level noise study. 5. The structures cannot be occupied, the final building permits cannot be approved, utilities cannot be released, the use cannot commence, and the Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued until the following has been completed: The applicant shall demonstrate that all measures required by these conditions to protect the nearby wetlands have been implemented. 6. During demolition, remediation, grading, site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Construction equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. b. Use low sulfur (0.5%) diesel fuel by weight in all diesel equipment. c. Shut off engines when not in use. d. Attempt to phase and schedule activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts. e. Discontinue operation during second stage smog alerts. f. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. g. Discovery of additional contamination/pipelines, etc. must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly. (FD) 7. The applicant shall completely remove the storage tanks from the site within 12 months from the date of approval of City building permits and agreements. 8. No parking shall be permitted on the south side of Edison Ave. (PW) 9. With the development of the proposed Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Facility, the applicant/operator of the project will deliver potable water to the City from a location within the project site, specifically the proposed Tank Storage site. The applicant/operator of the project shall provide a water pipeline from the tank storage site, a bypass water pipeline and located within the booster pump station, two pump cans including base plates, baffles, steal discharge heads, and suction manifolds per City requirements and specification. (PW) 10. The applicant shall keep the facility under video surveillance 24 hours per day every day. Videos should be saved for at least 30 days to provide Police with the recording.(PD) 11. Post clear signage describing the acceptable behavior allowed and uses of the facility. Signs should also make it clear that there is 24/7 video surveillance.(PD) 12. The administration building should be clearly marked to help visitors.(PD) 13. The entire facility should be lighted throughout all hours of darkness, but must conform to the lighting requirements of Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001.(PD) 14. The project shall comply with the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001. 15. The Planning and Building Department Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning and Building Department Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning and Building Department Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the City Council may be required pursuant to the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. 16. The applicant and applicant's representatives shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for review and approval. 17. The applicant/property owner and each successor in interest to the property which is the subject of this project shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the City, City Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 18. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 which amends Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 shall become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of final approval by the City Council of Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130, or within two years of the date of final Coastal Development Permit approval by the Coastal Commission if the Coastal Development Permit is appealed, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning and Building Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. SFND ID ID D ® D ® complete items 1,2,and 3 Also completed Slgna` item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. X f ❑Agent ■ Print.your name and address on the reverse f Address?e so`•that vie:can return the.card to you. B. R by h d ame) Cr Date of Delivery -5 ® Attach`this card'Wth&back of the mallpiece, or the front;if space peimits. D. Is delivery address different from item i? Y 1. Article Adtlressed to-If YES,enter delivery address below: o �O�i fnia AQ�(( NO �Yc OLc� I-VO ��1r11 L lA l L t 11�1 F1 o V 7 3. ice Type rtfied Ma_ii ❑Express Mail Registered -. 0 ReturnReceipt for Merchandise a YW�� c V/, ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D.. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number 7008 0520 0001 8218 5386 (transfer from service:label),- PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Kett �t�' toxsss o2-M-tsao>, kVA -13 CO ID. o m Ln ED 0 a to Postage $ Certified Fee Postmark C3 Return Receipt Fee Here O (Endorsement Required) a Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) d Lrl Total Postage&Fees d ro Sent To Street, 'No. No.; or PO Box �------ loo 1- City Sta�i /Flirt :0p0t. City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street o Huntington Beach, CA 92648 s ' OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK ® JOAN L. FLYNN CITY CLERK September 23, 2010 CERTIFIED MAIL California Coastal Commission South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL ON COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 10-014 (Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project) Applicant: Poseidon Resources Corporation, Attn: Josie McKinley, 17011 Beach Blvd., #900 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Property Owner: AES Huntington Beach, LLC, 21730 Newland St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646; City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main St., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Request: To permit the construction and operation of a 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project on a +13 acre site. The project includes up to ±4 miles of water transmission lines (+1 mile in the Coastal Zone) in Huntington Beach to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa and a tentative parcel map to facilitate the development of the project. Concurrent with its consideration of Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 the City Council shall consider rescission of Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. Should the City Council approve Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014, that approval would replace the City Council's prior approval of Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. Location: 21730 Newland (east side, south of Edison Avenue) Environmental Status: Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 (Seawater Desalination Project) is covered under Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001 which was certified on September 7, 2010. Coastal Status: Appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone: Date of Action: September 20, 2010 On September 20, 2010, after hearing a staff report presentation, conducting a public hearing, and discussion, the City of Huntington Beach City Council conditionally approved Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 10-014 and rescinded Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. Sister Cities: Anjo, Japan ® Waitakere, New Zealand (Telephone:714-536-5227) Notice of Action—CDP 10-014 Page 2 September 23, 2010 The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Carchio, Green, Bohr, Dwyer and Hansen NOES: None ABSENT: Coerper, Hardy This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone and may be appealed to the Commission within ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Action by the City Council on a Coastal Development Permit for appealable development may be appealed directly to the Coastal Commission pursuant to Sections 13111 and 13573 of the California Code of Regulations. An appeal to the Coastal Commission shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 13110 through 13120 of the California Code of Regulations. Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, the action taken by the City Council is final. Provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance are such that an application becomes null and void one (1) year after the final approval, unless actual construction has begun. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office at(714) 536-5227. Sincerely, ban L. Flynn City Clerk Attachment: Notice of Local Action for CDP 10-114 c: Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner G:CDP 10-014 Poseidon City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street • Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ® OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERIC ® JOAN L. FLYNN CITY CLERK NOTICE OF ACTION September 23, 2010 Josie McKinley Poseidon Resources Corporation 17011 Beach Blvd., #900 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 SUBJECT: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT(CDP) NO. 10-014 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP. NO. 10-130 (POSEIDON SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT) APPLICANT: Poseidon Resources Corporation, 17011 Beach Blvd.,#900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 REQUEST: CDP: To permit the construction and operation of a 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project on a +13 acre site. The project includes up to±4 miles of water transmission lines (±1 mile in the Coastal Zone) in Huntington Beach to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa and a tentative parcel map to facilitate the development of the project. Concurrent with its consideration of Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 the City Council shall consider rescission of Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. Should the City Council approve Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014, that approval would replace the City Council's prior approval of Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. TPM: To subdivide three parcels totaling +19.5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project. PROPERTY OWNERS: AES HB, LLC, 21730 Newland St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646; City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main St., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LOCATION: 21730 Newland (east side, south of Edison Avenue) DATE OF ACTION: September 20, 2010 Dear Ms. McKinley: At a regular meeting held on Monday, September 20, 2010 the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach considered your application and took action to conditionally approve Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 10-14 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-013 and rescind Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. Attached to this letter are the findings and conditions of approval for this application. Sister Cities: Anjo, Japan . Waitakere, New Zealand (Telephone:714-536-5227) This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone. Action taken by the City Council may be appealed directly to the Coastal Commission unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. Section 13573(a)(3) states that an appeal may be filed directly with the Coastal Commission if the appellant was denied the right of local appeal because local notice and hearing procedures for the development did not comply with the provisions of this article. If the above condition exists, an aggrieved person may file an appeal within ten (10) working days, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources Code, in writing to: South Coast Area Office California Coastal Commission 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 Attn: Theresa Henry (562) 590-5071 Provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance are such that any application becomes null and void one (1) year after final approval, unless actual construction has started. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office at (714) 536-5227. Sincerely, e "*J J4") Joan L. Flynn City Clerk Enclosure: Findings and Conditions of Approval: CDP No. 10-014/TPM No. 10-013 Page 4 of the City Council Action Agenda for September 20, 2010 c: Scott Hess, Director of Planning and Building Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 10-014/ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130: 1. Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-130 to subdivide three parcels totaling ±19.5 acres into four parcels is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property, or any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provisions of this Code. As modified by conditions and code requirements TPM No. 10-130 proposes four parcels that will comply with all requirements of the General Plan and Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance including, but not limited to, minimum lot size, lot width, and landscaping. The proposed parcels can adequately accommodate development consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations on the parcels. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. As modified by conditions and code requirements the proposed parcels will comply with, among others, minimum lot size, lot width, and landscaping requirements within the PS (Public-Semipublic) zoning district. The proposed parcel configuration and topography are suitable for the proposed development. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat with the exception of significant unavoidable impacts relating to short term construction air quality impacts and growth inducing impacts outside of Orange County. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Council approves the tentative parcel map because Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 10-001 was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made that specific economic, social or other considerations outweigh any impacts that cannot be avoided. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. There are no public access or use easements within the proposed parcel map. 5. The Final SEIR certified for the project on September 7, 2010 serves as adequate and appropriate environmental documentation for approval of TPM 10-130. The unavoidable significant adverse effects of the project as identified in Section 5.0 of the Statement of Facts and Findings (growth inducement outside of Orange County and short-term construction related impacts in regards to air quality) have been lessened in their severity by the application of standard code requirements, conditions, the inclusion of project design features and the imposition of the mitigation measures. The remaining unavoidable significant impacts are clearly outweighed by the economic, social, and other benefits of the project, as set forth in the "Statement of Overriding Considerations" included as Section 7.0 of the Statement of Facts and Findings. The City Council adopts the recitation of overriding considerations which justify approval of the project notwithstanding certain unavoidable significant environmental effects which cannot feasibly be substantially mitigated as set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL—COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 10-014 (REPLACING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 02-05): 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 to permit the construction and operation of a 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project on a +13 acre site including up to±4 miles of water transmission lines (+1 mile in the Coastal Zone) in Huntington Beach to connect to a regional transmission system in Costa Mesa and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10- 130 to facilitate the development of the project as proposed and modified by conditions of approval and code requirements, conforms to the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program by implementation of the following Coastal Element goals, objective, and policies: a. Objective C1.1 (p. IV-C-106): Ensure that adverse impacts associated with coastal zone development are mitigated or minimized to the greatest extent feasible. The project is consistent with this objective because all of the project's potential adverse impacts have either been mitigated or they have been minimized to the greatest extent feasible. This objective has been met on an impact-by-impact basis as demonstrated in the Subsequent EIR certified in connection with the project, as supported by substantial evidence in the record, and as documented in the Statement of Facts and Findings. The severity of certain adverse impacts (growth inducement outside of Orange County and short-term construction related impacts in regards to air quality) have been lessened by the application of standard code requirements, conditions, the inclusion of project design features and the imposition of mitigation, but it has not been feasible to minimize those impacts to a level of insignificance. Consequently, those impacts have been mitigated to the greatest extent feasible and a statement of overriding considerations has been adopted (see, Statement of Facts and Findings). b. Policy C1.1.1 (p. IV-C-106): With the exception of hazardous industrial development, new development shall be encouraged to be located within, contiguous or in close proximity to, existing developed areas able to accommodate it or, where such areas are not able to accommodate it, in other areas with adequate public services, and where it will not have significant adverse effects, either individually or cumulatively, on coastal resources. The project is consistent with this policy because it is proposed on a site that is already developed and will be in close proximity to the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station and the Station's existing seawater intake which will be able to accommodate the project. Pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. C. Policy C1.1.2 (p. IV-C-106): Coastal dependent developments shall have priority over other developments on or near the shoreline. Coastal-related developments should be accommodated within reasonable proximity of the coastal-dependent uses they support. The project would be a coastal-dependent development because it would need to be sited on or adjacent to the sea in order to function at all. Seawater desalination facilities like the project fall within the Coastal Act's definition of coastal dependent because such facilities require "a site on, or adjacent to the sea" in order to draw seawater into the facility, which is the only source water that this project will use to produce potable desalinated water. The project's location adjacent to the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station and proximate to its existing seawater intake is consistent with provisions in the Commission's 2004 report"Seawater Desalination and the California Coastal Act," which noted that desalination facilities sited near existing water distribution systems can mitigate potential adverse impacts and avoid additional infrastructure build out and growth that may be associated with such a build out. Further, seawater desalination facilities like the project are similar to other recognized coastal dependent uses that must be located adjacent to the sea to function, such as electric generating facilities, refineries, and offshore drilling for oil and gas. Thus, the project as located is consistent with this policy. d. Policy C 1.2.1 - Accommodate existing uses and new development in accordance with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan and the tevelopment and Density Schedule Table C-1 The project is consistent with this policy because it is consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan and Density Schedule. e. Policy C1.2.3 (p. IV C-108): Prior to the issuance of development entitlement, the City shall make the finding that adequate services (i.e., water, sewer, roads, etc.) can be provided to serve the proposed development, consistent with the policies contained in the Coastal Element, at the time of occupancy. The project is consistent with this policy because adequate services can be provided to serve the proposed development, consistent with the policies contained in the Coastal Element. Section 4.6 of the Subsequent EIR details the availability of all required public services for the proposed development. The project will convey water to the regional distribution system through an approximately 10 mile pipeline including four miles of new pipeline in the City of Huntington Beach. The portions of the pipeline in the City will be built in the public street right of way and is subject to the terms in the pipeline Franchise Agreement between Poseidon Resources and the City of Huntington Beach and approved by the Huntington Beach City Council on September 7, 2010. Connection to the regional distribution system through the City of Costa Mesa will utilize an existing water pipeline known as the OC-44 , which will be upgraded to a 48 to 54 inch diameter pipe. The OC-44 pipeline is jointly owned by the City of Huntington Beach and the Mesa Consolidated Water District. f. Objective C3.1 (p. IV-C-113): Preserve, protect and enhance, where feasible, existing public recreation sites in the Coastal Zone. The project is consistent with this objective because, as discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, the limited area affected by salinities caused by the project that re higher than 40 opt would not represent substantial ecological effects or degradation of water quality due to the absence of areas of special bioloaic� significance or the presence of threatened or endangered species. Speciffilcally. enthic areas affected by project discharge do not support sensitive species, species that encounter elevated salinity will have very low exposure times. foraging areas affected would not be substantial. and no threatened or endangered species or kelp beds exist within the vicinity of the existing outfall. Furthermore, fishes with high commercial or recreational importance are very uncommon in the intake source water In addition, the groject is anticipated to have a negUaible impact on narks and recreation facilities, and will be required to pay development impact fees prior to the issuance of grading permits. /See Subsequent EIR Section g. Policy C4.2.1 (p. IV-C-119): Ensure that the following minimum standards are met by new development in the Coastal Zone as feasible and appropriate: Preservation of public views to and from the bluffs, to the shoreline and ocean and to the wetlands; Adequate landscaping and vegetation; Evaluation of project design regarding visual impact and compatibility; and Incorporate landscaping to mask oil operations and major utilities, such as the electrical power plant on Pacific Coast Highway. The project is consistent with this policy because the project plans include a number of measures to minimize adverse visual effects of the proposed facility. The facility would be comprised of relatively low profile buildings reaching approximately 35 feet above the existing grade, which is below the 50-foot height limitation specified in the Zoning Code. The overall appearance would be similar to a commercial office building. As part of the facility design, both vegetative and architectural screening has been added to ensure that exposed pipelines, tanks, and other utility-type equipment are screened from public view. The project would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. h. Objective C 4.7 - Improve the appearance of visually degraded areas within the Coastal Zone. The project is consistent with this objective because it will be an improvement to the area by demolishing three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. The project is required to provide a 10 foot(Edison) and 20 foot (Newland) landscape planter along the perimeter of the site to enhance the appearance of the area. i. Policy C4.7.5 (p. IV-C-122): Require the review of new and/or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The project is consistent with this policy because the project will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed.structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. Proposed pipeline facilities are located within the coastal zone; however consistent with the Local Coastal Program, the facilities would be located below grade to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. j. Policy C4.7.8 (p. IV-C-122): Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. The project is consistent with this policy because exterior berms will remain in place, landscaping is proposed along the Edison and Newland project frontages and architectural screening is provided for proposed tanks and structures. k. Policy C4.7.9 (p. IV-C-122): Require the removal of non-productive oil production facilities and the restoration of the vacated site. The project will replace a dilapidated fuel oil storage tank and will restore the site, substantially improving the existing visual character of the site. I. Policy C6.1.1 (p. IV-C-124): Require that new development include mitigation measures to enhance water quality, if feasible; and, at a minimum, prevent the degradation of water quality of groundwater basins, wetlands, and surface water. The project is consistent with this policy because it is subject to mitigation measures relating to water quality. The Subsequent EIR contains a number of mitiaatio measures esianod to prevent the dearadatjon of and enhance water quality jn groundwater basins,wetlands, surface water and product water. These mitigation measures are contained in the Subsequent EIR. As provided in Section 4.3 of the Subsequent EIR, the.project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems, or contribute significant increases in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm, or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The project also will enhance water quality by removing bacteria from source water. In addition, the Project further will enhance water quality by reducing thermal footprint of the discharge from the power plant during the co-located operating condition. Moreover, neither the Project's discharge of trace amounts of cleaning compounds nor the slightly increased salinity levels in the area will degrade the quality of ocean water surrounding the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station and the proposed desalination facility. The desalination facility will clean its reverse osmosis membranes with chemicals that are analogous to household cleaners. The initial rinse of the membrane cleaning solution will be treated at a wastewater treatment facility, and only the second rinse, which will contain trace amounts of cleaning compounds below detection limits for hazardous waste, will be discharged into the ocean after it is thoroughly diluted in water. As concluded in Appendix R to the Subsequent EIR (RO Membrane Cleaning Solution Discharge Test Stream Data), even before dilution, the vast majority of the chemicals within the membrane cleaning solution would be either below detection levels or regulatory limits. Dilution of these substances will even further minimize the already less than significant impacts on the local marine environment. The Subseauent EIR analyzed the potential impacts of the project on ocean water quafity- Rased on the analysis contained in the Subsequent EIR. no mitigatjon measures are reaujred to protect or enhance ocean water quality. (See SEIR Section 4.10.) Specifically. the Subsequent EIR found that there would be no degradation of water quality and there was not a reasonable potential for acute toxicity effects to occur at or below a seawater concentration of 40 ppt. The slightly elevated saljnjty level of the project's seawater discharge in the co-locate ep ratjng scenario achieves compliance with the project's approved NPDES Order No. R8-2006-0034 and the standards established in the Order and the water quality objectives established within the Ocean Plan, NPDES Order No. R8-2006-0034 establishes a 1,000 foot Zone of Initjal Dilution (ZID) and a dilution factor of 7.5:1 or greater that must be met at the edge of the ZID. Further, most marine species in the water around Huntington Beach are also found in geographic regions that naturally have a salinity range comparable to or greater than what is predicted in the ZID. See Appendix O to EIR (Marine Biological Considerations Related to the Reverse Osmosis Desalination Project at the Applied Energy Sources Huntington Beach Generation Station). The stand-alone operating condition would comply with the standards and 7.5:1 dilution factor established in Order No R8-2006-0034 and comply with Ocean Pla Ards. Similar to the co-located condition_ the limited area a�tpcted by initjes higher than 40 ppt would not represent substantial ecological effects or degradation of water quality due to the absence of areas of special biologics sianificance or the presence of threatened or endangered species. Further, dewatering discharge during project construction would be directed to a desilting system, and would be sampled and tested periodically to ensure compliance with all NPDES regulations and with De minimus Permit requirements (Order No. R8- 208-0003 (CAG 9980)). Should contaminated groundwater be encountered, mitigation measures require groundwater remediation prior to any discharge into the sanitary sewer system. The maximum dewatering volume associated with desalination facility construction will be over five times smaller than the groundwater "draw" volume associated with natural daily tidal fluctuations to which the wetlands are exposed. Despite the fact that it is highly unlikely for dewatering operations to have an effect on the nearby wetlands and structures, a monitoring well system will be installed and operated for the duration of the project construction period in order to ascertain that construction activities do not have any measurable impacts on groundwater quality or levels outside of the boundaries of the desalination facility site. The measured water level will be compared to the water level in a control groundwater monitoring well that is outside of the desalination facility site in order to confirm that groundwater level in the wetlands is not influenced by the dewatering operations. Thus, dewatering activities due to project construction are not anticipated to have significant impacts in regards to hydrogeology and water quality. M. Policy C6.1.2 (p. IV-C-124): Marine resources shall be maintained, enhanced, and where feasible, restored. Special protection shall be given to areas and species of special biological or economic significance. The project is consistent with this policy because, as discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, the limited area affected by salinities caused 1Z the project that are higher than 40 opt would not represent substantial ecological effects or degradation of water quality due to the absence of areas of special biologics significance or the presence of threatened or endangered species: Specifically. benthjc areas affected by project discharge do not support sensitive species. species that encounter elevated salinity well have very low exposure times. foraging areas affected would not be substantial. and no threatened or endangered species or kelp beds exist within the vicinity of the existing outf Thus, there are no areas or species reaujrjng special protection, Studies of desaljnatjon facjlity entrainment and impingement analmd in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR also show that the protect will result On less-than significant entrainment and jmpjnaement impacts and therefore will not conflict with this poljcy. The most frequently entrained species by the existing Hoontinnto Beach Generating station are very abundant in the area of the Huntington Beach Generatina Station intake and the Southern California Sight, and therefore actual ecological effects due to any additional entrainment from the desalination facility under co-located operating conditions are insignficiant, and the loss of marine �genisrms due to the pmject's potential entrainment will have no effect on the species' ability to sustain their porulations. Moreover, species with high commercial and recreational importance, such as California halibut and rockfishes, were shown to be very uncommon in the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake flows, and therefore the project would not adversely impact species of special significance. Project entrainment under stand-alone conditions is similarly less than significant and impacts on marine organisms resulting from the project are relatively small, would not substantially reduce populations of affected species, or affect the ability of the affected species to sustain their populations. With respect to impingement, under co-located operating conditions the project would not increase the volume or velocity of the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station cooling water intake and thus would not increase the number of impingement losses caused by that intake and would avoid impingement impacts that would result from the implementation of a new intake structure. Under stand-alone operating conditions, the project would result in an estimated average daily impingement of 0.9 pounds per day, which is less than the daily diet of one brown sea. For the Carlsbad Desalination Project, Coastal Commission determined of impingement of more than twice this amount was de minimus and insignificant. The Huntington Beach Generating Station's existing velocity cap and bar racks on the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake would remain in place during stand-alone operating conditions, which serve to substantially reduce impingement of marine mammals and sea turtles. Studies on the effectiveness of the HBGS' velocity cap have shown impingement reductions as high as 90%'. Based on impingement measurements discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, project impingement would not result in substantial reductions in fish or shellfish operations, and it is not anticipated that project impingement losses would have any effects on the ability of impinged species to sustain their populations. Moreover, the project is not within an Area of Special Biological Significance, and the low flows projected for the stand-alone operating condition indicate that stand-alone project impingement may be lower than impingement caused by existing Huntington Beach Generating Station operations. n. Policy C6.1.3 (p. IV-C-124): Uses of the marine environment shall be carried out in a manner that will sustain the biological productivity of coastal waters and that will maintain healthy populations of all species of marine organisms adequate for long-term commercial, recreational, scientific and educational purposes. The project is consistent with this policy because, as discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, the limited area affected by salinities caused by the �rQiect that are higher than 40 opt would not represent substantial ecological effects or degradation of water quality due to the absence of areas of special biological significance or the presence of threatened or endangered species. Specifically. benthic areas affected by project discharge do not support sensitise species. species that encounter elevated salinity will hale eery love exposure times. raging areas affected would not be substantial, and no threatened or endangered species or kelp beds exist within the vicinity of the existing outfall. 'Water Quality Control Policy for the use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling, Final Substitute Environmental Document(SED pg. 100) Furthermore. fishes with high commercial or recreational Importance are very uncommon in the intake source water. Studies of desalination facility entrainment and impingement analyzed in Section 4.40 of the Subsequent EIR also show that the project will result in less than _significant entrainment and impingement impacts and therefore will not comfl6c with this ®olicy. The most frequently entrained species by the existing Hbntingto Beach Generating station are very abundant in the area of the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake and the Southern California Bight, and therefore actual ficolloalcall effects due to any additional entrainment from the desalination facjllty und er co located operating conditions are insianficiant and the loss of inarine �ganisms due to the project's potential entrainment will have no effect on the species' ability to sustain their populations. Moreover, species with high commercial and recreational importance, such as California halibut and rockfishes, were shown to be very uncommon in the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake flows, and therefore the project would not adversely impact species of special significance. Project entrainment under stand-alone conditions is similarly less than significant and impacts on marine organisms resulting from the project are relatively small, would not substantially reduce populations of affected species, or affect the ability of the affected species to sustain their populations. With respect to impingement, under co-located operating conditions the project would not increase the volume or velocity of the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station cooling water intake and thus would not increase the number of impingement losses caused by that intake and would avoid impingement impacts that would result from the implementation of a new intake structure. Under stand-alone operating conditions, the project would result in an estimated average daily impingement of 0.9 pounds per day, which is less than the daily diet of one brown sea pelican. For the Carlsbad Desalination Project, Coastal Commission determined of impingement of more than twice this amount was de minimus and insignificant. The Huntington Beach Generating Station's existing velocity cap and bar racks on the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake would remain in place during stand-alone operating conditions, which serve to substantially reduce impingement of marine mammals and sea turtles. Studies on the effectiveness of the HBGS' velocity cap have shown impingement reductions as high as 90%2. Based on impingement measurements discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, project impingement would not result in substantial reductions in fish or shellfish operations, and it is not anticipated that project impingement losses would have any effects on the ability of impinged species to sustain their populations. Moreover, the project is not within an Area of Special Biological Significance, and the low flows projected for the stand-alone operating condition indicate that stand-alone project impingement may be lower than impingement caused by existing Huntington Beach Generating Station operations. Thus, healthy populations of all species of marine organisms that may be affected by project operations would be maintained. o. Policy C6.1.4: The biological productivity and the quality of coastal waters, streams, wetlands, estuaries and lakes appropriate to maintain organisms and for the protection of human health shall be maintained, and where feasible, restored. 2 Ibid. The project is consistent with this policy because, as provided in the findings for Policies C6.1.1 and 6.1.3, the project would not degrade water quality or adversely affect biological productivity. p. Policy C6.1.12 (p. IV-C-127): Periodically review the City's policies on water conservation, including the Water Conservation Ordinance, to ensure the use of state of the art conservation measures for new development and redevelopment, and retrofitting of existing development, where feasible and appropriate, to implement these measures. The project is consistent with this policy because as a user of potable water provided by the City of Huntington Beach, the project must comply with all applicable requirements of the Water Conservation Ordinance. (See Municipal Code Chapter 14.18.) q. Policy C6.1.13 (p. IV-C-127): Encourage research and feasibility studies regarding ocean water desalinization as an alternative source of potable water. Participate in regional studies and efforts where appropriate. The project does not conflict with this policy as it is a seawater desalination facility intended to provide an alternative source of potable water. r. Policy C6.1.19 (p. IV-C-128): Prior to approval of any new or expanded seawater pumping facilities, require the provision of maximum feasible mitigation measures to minimize damage to marine organisms due to entrainment in accordance with state and federal law. Application of CEQA significance thresholds results in a determination that the seawater desalination facility would not cause significant adverse impacts to marine life due to entrainment when it operates in either the co-located operating condition, or in the stand- alone operating condition. Sections 30230 and 30231 of the California Coastal Act (Coastal Act) require generally that marine resources be maintained, enhanced, and where feasible, restored. They also require that the marine environment be used in a manner that sustains biological productivity and maintains healthy populations of all marine species. The Subsequent EIR concluded that under either the co-located or stand-alone operating condition that the desalination project would not substantially reduce populations of affected species such that the sustainability of the affected species could not be maintained. As discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, the most frequently entrained species by the existing Huntington Beach Generating station are very abundant in the area of the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake and the Southern California Bight, and therefore actual ecological effects due to any additional entrainment from the desalination facllity under co-located operating conditions are insi ifican and the loss of marine organisms due to the project's potential entrainment will have no effect on the species' ability to sustain their populations Project entrainment under stand-alone conditions is similarly less than significant and impacts on marine organisms resulting from the project are relatively small, would not substantially reduce populations of affected species, or affect the ability of the affected species to sustain their populations. Further, there are no threatened or endangered species in the desalination project's source water and the project is not within an Area of Special Biological Significance. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the project would conflict with these policies or the LCP. It should also be noted that the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station intake is fitted with a velocity cap and bar racks which serve to substantially reduce impingement effects, as noted in the discussion of project design features in Subsequent EIR Section 3.4. These features serve to avoid impingement of larger fishes and organisms such as marine mammals and sea turtles, and would remain in place. Therefore it is not anticipated that impingement of marine mammals or sea turtles would result from operation of the desalination facility. Studies on the effectiveness of the HBGS' velocity cap have shown impingement reductions as high as 90%3. Thus it is not anticipated that the project would conflict with provisions of the Water Code requiring that new industrial facilities using seawater for processing must use the best available site, design, technology and mitigation feasible to minimize intake and mortality of marine life. (See Water Code Section 13142.5(b).) s. Policy C7.1.3 (p. IV-C-129): Development in areas adjacent to environmentally sensitive habitat areas and parks and recreation areas shall be sited and designed to prevent impacts which would significantly degrade those areas, and shall be compatible with the continuance of those habitat and recreation areas. The project has been intentionally located, and additional mitigation measures have been crafted, to avoid any significant environmental impacts to the Magnolia Marsh wetland area situated to the southeast of the project site. (See SEIR Section 4.9.) The project will be separated from coastal wetlands by significant setbacks and existing containment berms, which will keep storm water onsite. In addition, the desalination facility will feature an onsite local storm water drainage system, which will include catch basins that will collect any potential runoff that is contained by the existing berms and then direct it to a storm water pump via gravity lines. The project is conditioned to incorporate applicable Best Management Practices in order to contain stormwater runoff and will be in compliance with all standards as administered by the State Water Resources Control Board and County of Orange. Further, the project will be graded so that all onsite stormwater will flow away from the wetland area and toward the local drainage system. Any outdoor lighting will have limited intensity and be directed away from the sky and adjacent wetlands. The project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems, or contribute significant increases in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm, or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. (See SEIR Section 4.3.) Although no significant impacts have been identified, mitigation measures ensure adequate sizing and design of the stormwater drainage system. Accordingly, the project is consistent with this policy because it includes significant setbacks from the areas discussed in this policy, is further buffered by existing berms and proposed landscaping, and is subject to mitigation measures to ensure that runoff will not adversely affect these areas. In addition, pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. t. Policy C7.1.4 (p. IV-C-130): Require that new development contiguous to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitat areas include buffer zones. Buffer zones shall be a s Ibid. minimum of one hundred feet setback from the landward edge of the wetland, with the exception of the following: A lesser buffer may be permitted if existing development or site configuration precludes a 100-foot buffer, or conversely, a greater buffer zone may be required if substantial development or significantly increased human impacts are anticipated. In either case, the following factors shall be considered when determining whether a lesser or wider buffer zone is warranted. Reduced buffer zone areas shall be reviewed by the Department of Fish and Game prior to implementation. (a) Biological significance of adjacent lands: The buffer should be sufficiently wide to protect the functional relationship between wetland and adjacent upland. (b) Sensitivity of species to disturbance: The buffer should be sufficiently wide to ensure that the most sensitive species will not be disturbed significantly by permitted development, based on habitat requirements of both resident and migratory species and the short and long term adaptability of various species to human disturbance. (c)Susceptibility of parcel to erosion: The buffer should be sufficiently wide to allow for interception of any additional material eroded as a result of the proposed development based on soil and vegetative characteristics, slope and runoff characteristics, and impervious surface coverage. (d) Use of existing cultural features to located buffer zones: The buffer zone should be contiguous with the environmentally sensitive habitat area and make use of existing features such as roads, dikes, irrigation canals, and flood control channels where feasible.. The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to.all of the minimum setback requirements included in Policy C7.1.4. A buffer zone in excess of 100 feet is not warranted because the proposed development is not substantial. Rather it is limited to the buildings, tanks, pipelines and appurtenances described in Section 3.4 of the Subsequent E1R which include project design features agreed to by the applicant (for example, noise attenuation features). Likewise, human impacts have not been significantly increased by the project because the proposed desalination facility would only employ an approximate total of 18 people. None of the factors that could result in requiring a greater buffer zone are present. The buffer zone provided by the project is sufficiently wide to protect the functional relationship between the nearby wetland and the upland, to protect the most sensitive species and to intercept any material eroded as a result of the proposed development. The buffer zone provided by the project makes use of existing features including without limitation the existing flood control channel and existing containment berms. Finally, even though a buffer zone in excess of 100 feet is not warranted, due to the project location the buffer zone provided by the project often exceeds 100 feet. u. Policy C7.1.5 (p. IV-C-130): Notify county, state, and federal agencies having regulatory authority in wetlands and other environmentally sensitive habitats when development projects in and adjacent to such areas are submitted to the City. The implementation of any Habitat Conservation Plan shall require an amendment to the Local Coastal Program. Incidental take of sensitive habitat and/or species that occurs in the context of development must be consistent with this LCP. The project does not conflict with this policy because it does not propose any development in wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitats, and would not result in the incidental take of sensitive habitats or species. v. Goal C8 (p. IV-C-131): Accommodate energy facilities with the intent to promote beneficial effects while mitigating any potential adverse effects. As part of this Coastal Development Permit and Poseidon's related entitlement applications, the project was reconfigured to accommodate potential future plans for the existing power plant either to expand or to switch to a different cooling system. Accordingly, the project does not conflict with this goal, because the project was reconfigured to accommodate the existing energy facility. w. Policy C8.2.4 (p. IV-C-132): Accommodate coastal dependent energy facilities within the Coastal Zone consistent with Sections 30260 through 30264 of the Coastal Act. The project is not an energy facility. The project is co-located with the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station. As provided in the finding for LCP Goal C8, the project was reconfigured to accommodate an existing energy facility and thus does not conflict with this policy. x. Policy C8.3.1 (p. IV-C-133): Promote the use of solar energy and encourage energy conservation. The project is consistent with this policy because the desalination facility buildings would accommodate potential solar panels on a roof surface of approximately 39,000 square feet, with the potential to generate approximately 606 MWh/yr of electricity. Moreover, the proposed project would incorporate high-efficiency design, green building design and would reduce energy that would otherwise be needed to pump 56,000 acre feet of water per year into Orange County. The project's Energy Minimization and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan specifically requires the desalination facility to incorporate on-site energy minimization features including numerous Project components designed to ensure that the Project will use only the minimum energy necessary. These include energy efficiency measures like the state of the art"pressure exchanger" energy recovery technology that allows recovery and reuse of 33.9% of the energy associated with desalination's reverse osmosis process, as well as high efficiency and premium efficiency motors and variable frequency drives on the intake water pumps to improve their efficiency. In addition, the project would avoid 175,000 MWh/yr of electricity consumption that would otherwise be required to deliver imported water to serve Orange County customers, and the Energy Minimization and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan requires Poseidon to entirely offset the project's net GHG emissions above the existing baseline for this water importation so that the project will not cause an increase in GHG emissions above the existing baseline. These energy minimization measures will reduce impacts to coastal resources that would have been caused through additional energy usage, and will minimize energy consumption consistent with Coastal Act section 30253(4) and other applicable Coastal Act and LCP policies The features of the project's Energy Minimization and Green House Gas Reduction Plan are consistent with the plan approved by the Coastal Commission as part of Poseidon's Carlsbad desalination plant's Coastal Development Permit. y. Policy C10.1.4 (p. IV-C-136): Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand ground shaking and liquefaction such as those stated in the Uniform Building Code. The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all appropriate and applicable building standards related to ground shaking and liquefaction. The proposed desalination project is located within an unused fuel oil storage tan facility construct id and operated by Southern California Bison. In addition to the pri alination facility site, the proposed projec would also include several related off site improvements including tie-in pipelines _between the existing Huntington'Beach Generating Station condenser cooling water discharge system and the proposed desalination project. modifications to an existing csura�ip station and up to approximately 4 miles of product water delivery pipelines within the city. The intake/discharge pipelines would be located entirely within the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station site. The majority,of the product water delivery pipeline would be located within existing public streets, easements. or other ts-of-wiav in urban areas. As such, the proposed new development is locate within existing developed areas The proposed use is consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan designation of P(Public)for the site because it will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, and it is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities-Even though Poseidon will not be regulated by the Public Utilities Commission, Poseidon will sell the output of the desalination facility through wholesale contracts with retail water providers that are regulated by the state, public water agencies, and municipalities. Therefore, and as the City Planning and Building Department determined,in a letter dated February 6, 2006, because the facility will be a wholesale supplier to regulated utilities, public water agencies and municipalities, and will provide much-needed water services to the public, it is properly classified as a public/semi-public use. Typical permitted uses within areas of the P (Public) designation include governmental administrative and related facilities, such as utilities, schools, public parking lots, infrastructure, religious, and similar uses. As the City Planning and Building Department has previously determined, use of the words and phrases "such as"' and "similar uses" provides evidence of an intent to provide for other land uses not explicitly listed under this category; therefore, the uses listed under Public (P) are not exclusive, but are examples. As an example, the Huntington Beach Generating Station site, which is also designated as Public(P), is an industrial electrical generating station that is not specifically cited in the list of permitted uses, but is nonetheless consistent with the General Plan designation. Thus, the desalination facility is compatible and consistent with the Land Use Plan designation of P (Public). In addition, the desalination facility site is zoned as Public-Semipublic with Oil and Coastal Zone Overlays (PS-0-CZ). This designation provides for similar uses to those allowed by the City of Huntington Beach General Plan. Included under Section 204.08(R) of the City's zoning code as acceptable uses under this zoning designation are "water or wastewater treatment plants... and similar facilities of public agencies or public utilities" (City of Huntington Beach 1997)._As of September 6, 2005, the Director of Planning an Building had determined pursuant to his authority under Section 204.02 of the zoning code that the desalination proiect is consistent with this zoning designation. Thws. the proposed use is compatible and consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use Dan and the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance as well as with properties lately surrounding the subject site and meets the requirements of the Land Use Plan and:the Development and Density Schedule. The project will improve the appearance of the area by demolishing three existing unused 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and replacing them with lower profile. modern. ! f l t 1 • • • • • r 1 1 - • 1 •'III 11 It 1'1 • • 1 �. . I ! - 11 l 11 .'11 ! 1' ! 1 r 1' III LL q II, ., IFITTISM i NTT, • _ • 1 - 1, • •�I • • ! - � - ! L i _ - i 'L • _ r: '.1 . • 1 _ - 1, ' 1 ei - I ! ;1 • 11''! . 1' , 'U in ! 1 ! I • 1'1 ,� • ! ! • 1 1 • '11 • • 't t' 1, • Y ' �, , 1 F -III - • _ • .i '! 1 • 1 • • - ;• o ! '• • 1 t - •i I •I •MT ,it !! • 1 ! MOT,I - : MY • 1 !n UOTITTl.1 • ' !.. OM II - 1 . 1 �, - • - 't' I� • 1' ! .1'.: 1 ' :, • • '• - f !, ! - ! .:! - ! jli + ' ,:. .; •, I � ,-' 1 • i'ill - • ! 1 ! 1 1 • o _ •Eel• _ 1 •CTONI _ d 142_19111 1:17TWOMI'l • 1 i 1 ! ; • - p.e' • •' ADD • • ► • is F( 1t 7 • 1TMI Mr.q Mail -0 IMP MT PRIIIIINT • - •- -• • - • • -• • • • 1 - • i om • 1!'• i. 1 II - .,�.. II, r, , • . '1,! ! ! 1 .', !'; .I! 'i t - • 1 � '•' ' r1 t � '�1 � - i . � • • ! !,'t ..:t - • III • - y - • y - 't - !I • - t r . t � - - • � t - !'..- •1718 RU lolivelr. III KA 11:..1 II . }.: - iu: wall 1, '!I • '.. 1 !.. L I• ti .. i I..'!I, • - • ^ 'I' 1 • 1 If1' t IU • •• l • F71• ollqot 7 - • •i 1' . 'I + 1 III ' 1 III • < � ! • �' t __ - •I t !I - •r' 1 • • • ,'1'+.I • III ! 1'1' 1 1't 1 I I'f . ',1 171MVP MI • - • I I • I L • •'1 lif ' tt ,!', 1 • - ,t,t• t ', 1 ! " i ' 1 111, - 1 1 f • I' . • ' �► • I t - ■ [ 1 ! • t 1 It t i ! • t • e t ! .�• •+ t, . • t ! t t,!I 14 � !IL 11 ' - ! - • • - • 11 • Y ! -'FL - t t ! • - y ' -_ 1 I19 - I 11 ',! • ,III, I • !'. t t.l _ - • -• - • •-• •- - - - • • -• • • • 1 • 1 7 1 ■ in 1' !' a 't MCI:]tFull It •&iFlil • I 7- Ileff-o slk 1' - arm[ 1, i ! 1, 1 !, I! t I P -':1+ L J t • • 1 ! 'I,l ., • ,! . t !' t a' . y t • t • t !. r t ! • t • 1' Ill ! t, II a ! t tl ► • 1 II li 1'D'I! • 111 ! . • (, itI!I 11110• . • •:t d I I i:ls a • 7 1r. 11 • 71 1 11 • • t 11,, t 1,1-11H ETTRIMMF7171 ITT. • . - I, ! t _ !i a t. • I, w '! • tKM q PMT Me ! ! i1I1 • I, provide Orange County with 50 million aallons of notable water per day. accommodatona the needs of Orange County regardless of weather or governmentally ed conditions affecting water supply. By building the facility and locating it i each, the facility will demonstrate the opportunities offered by desalination, and will offer cities, counties, and the State of California a_tangible example of how desalination can become more widely accented throughout the state and the nation, and will encourage additional research and feasibility studies regardeng ocean water desalination as an alternative source of notable water. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, O Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The project meets or exceeds all minimum development standards including but not limited to setbacks, height, parking, and lot size/width. The project is required to comply with all Public Works, Fire, and Planning and Building Department codes and requirements. The project conforms to the City's Design Guidelines and incorporates variations in form, building details, colors, and materials that create visual interest. The project provides buffering from sensitive uses such as residential developments through landscaping, a block wall, and increased setbacks. The perimeter wall is designed in a manner to create an attractive appearance and will be consistent with the wall design approved for the portion of the HBGS property to the south for a cohesive appearance. The proiect meets all the requirements of the O Overlay District. The project meets the minimum size regujrem mts, and the project includes a reuse plan to remediate property that has been contaminated by previous oil-related use. The property is required to operate in compliance with Title 15, Uniform Fare Code, and any other applicable Federal. State. County. or local rules and regulations, and must be approved by the Fare Department. Non-permitted egujpment will not be allowed to be used on the eject sate, and all requirements for the use of an O overlay zone have been or will be met, ancludjng dedication requirements. The project meets all the applicable reaujrements for the CZ overlay district. The pro. t_preserv_es and improves exostana visual resources and complies with maximum heiaht limitations, off-street parkjna requirements, landscaping requirements, and other requirements. Due to the nature of existing utility improvements at the project location, there is currently no public access at the site: therefor% oubug access wall not be affected by the project. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. The proposed project is an infill development, which as conditioned and with the implementation of all mitigation measures will provide all necessary infrastructure to adequately service the site and not impact adjacent development. This includes dedication and improvements to the project frontage along Edison Avenue to improve circulation in the area. The proposed project wall comply with Caty of Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements, including the installation of fire sprinklers and fire hydrants. and impacIs of the project on the Fare Department are not expected to be significant. There are no anticipated additional impacts of the project on Police protection. The project Os expected to have little or no impact on IjbraHes. The impacts on roadway maintenance caused by the project are expected to be less than significant. The project is anticipated to have a neglagableimpacton parks and recreation facilities within the City. Proiect impacts to existing wastewater facilities are expected to be nal, and the Proiect glans are anticipated to include a new sewer line or private sewer system to accommodate additional wastewater. A local storm water drainage system would be implemented as part of the site facility, and storm water wooly be treated on-site prior to off-site discharge, as necessary to meet applicable rements set by the Santa'Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board or the City. The Proiect would require new facilities to sumport operational water uses. but these _uses are nexpected>to create significant impacts. There are no significant impacts of the Proiect on reclaimed water use. The Proiect would not create any sianifican ts on e disposition of solid waste. The project's power demand would be leas than one percent of the demand within Orange County or Southern California. and is anficipated to be less than significant. No impacts on natural gas supply are anticipated in the implementation of the Proiect. No significant impacts on telephone and cable service are anticipated by the project 4. The development of the desalination project and approximately one mile of water transmission lines within the Coastal Zone conforms to the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act as they will not impede any public access to the coast and public recreation opportunities in the area. All public access to the coast and public recreation in the area will not be impeded during the long-term operation of the facility as well as during the construction process with the implementation of conditions of approval and mitigation measures. The site does not currently provide public access or_public recreation opportunities because of the nature of the historic uses at the site. The proposed project is consistent with the Public and Semjpubljc utjlity uses for which the site is designated, and is not suited for public access or recreation purposes for a number of reasons, including concerns about publjc safety. The site is located landward of Pacific Coast Highway and would not provide a connection to e coast or public recreation opportunities, as it is virtually surrounded by industrial, utjlity or commercial uses. Nonetheless, because no public access or recreational opportunities currently exist on the site. the Project will no e existing Public access to the coast or public recreation opportunjties in the are& The proiect well not jmpact any existing public parking or beach access and will no discourage or impact any exjstjng lower cost visitor and recreational facilities. The project site is currently not accessjble to the beach,thus no access well be impacted. The Proposed project well not impede any uniaue water-oriented actjvities, nor does i involve any oceanfront land suitable for recreational use. The Proiect involves the use of Private lands that are not suitable for visitor-serving commercial recreatkma facilities. Even if the lands were suitable for such vjsjtor-serving uses, the project proposes a coastal-dependent industry use,which is not of a lower Prjority tha visitor-serving uses. 5. The Final SEIR certified for the project on September 7, 2010 serves as adequate and appropriate environmental documentation for approval of CDP 10-014. The unavoidable significant adverse effects of the project as identified in Section 5.0 of the Statement of Facts and Findings (growth inducement outside of Orange County and short-term construction related impacts in regards to air quality) have been lessened in their severity by the application of standard code requirements, conditions, the inclusion of project design features and the imposition of the mitigation measures. The remaining unavoidable significant impacts are clearly outweighed by the economic, social, and other benefits of the project, as set forth in the "Statement of Overriding Considerations" included as Section 7.0 of the Statement of Facts and Findings. The City Council adopts the recitation of overriding considerations which justify approval of the project notwithstanding certain unavoidable significant environmental effects which cannot feasibly be substantially mitigated as set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 1. The tentative parcel map received and dated August 11, 2010 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. Remove Note G on Newland Street because the dedication and street widening on Newland Street has already occurred and there is no need for additional dedication. (PW) b. Horizontal control (i.e. bearing and distance) should be added for the hammerhead off of Edison Street. (PW) c. Remove the word "Emergency" from Note J and replace it with the word "Public" so that Note J would state "Proposed Public Access Easement." (PW) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 10-014: 1. The site plans, floor plans, elevations, and landscaping plan received and dated August 12, 2010 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The landscape area on the east side of the project site on Parcel 3 shall include the removal of all Myoporum, and shall be planted with a palette of plants indigenous to the Southern California coastal community. b. Provide a patio along the front entrance of the administration building. (DRB) c. Provide landscape planters around the administration building. (DRB) d. Provide screening for the solids loading area and filter substation compatible with the project. (DRB) e. Provide screening to the top of the chemical storage, carbon dioxide, and flush tanks. (DRB) f. The landscaping plan shall reflect plant materials that are more mature than the minimum code requirements subject to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. (DRB) g. The applicant shall install landscaping on Parcel 2 along Newland and Edison to match the project for a consistent appearance. h. The landscaping and wall plan shall be consistent in design, colors, and materials with the landscaping and wall plan for AES for a cohesive appearance. i. The landscaping along the Newland and Edison lease area street frontages shall include the densest type and number of trees to provide the most effective screening possible and shall be maintained to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. j. A perimeter block wall shall be constructed along the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility/Poseidon boundary, per Public Works Department requirements. (PW) k. Buildings of the subject project may not cross property lines. Lot lines shall be adjusted at the proposed treatment facility accordingly. (PW) 1. Revise 36"-42" City Pipeline Stub to 18"-36" City Pipeline Stub. (PW) m. Tree species planted along Edison Street shall not canopy over the street to avoid blocking large maintenance vehicles accessing the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility. (CS) 2. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the following shall be completed: For the demolition of the three (3) 200 foot diameter fuel oil tanks, a work plan must be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to commencement of work. (FD) 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall submit written proof of final project approval by each applicable regulating agency including but not limited to the California Coastal Commission, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District and all applicable water agencies and cities. b. The required Precise Grading Plan shall include the following: (PW) 1) Extension of the existing 8-inch diameter City sewer main in Edison Avenue easterly to the terminus of said street. 2) Connection to the existing 8-inch sewer main along the adjacent property's northerly property line (also southerly of the existing Orange County Flood Control District's right-of-way) shall be prohibited. c. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant will enter into a Franchise agreement approved and executed by the City for the generation and transport of product water from the site, and through and across the city's streets, rights-of-way or properties. (PW) (MC 3.44) d. A separate (new) irrigation water service and meter installed per Water Division Standards, and sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the landscape irrigation demand and the Water Efficient Landscape Requirements (MC 14.52)the minimum size shall be 1". (PW) e. The proposed 30" tank overflow line shall be prohibited from surface discharging directly into the public right-of-way. (PW) f. Areas for containment shall be provided to mitigate possible spillage of any materials affecting storm water quality that may be stored on-site, and to protect the adjacent wetlands to the maximum extent feasible. (PW) 4. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. A Water Purchase Agreement shall be executed between the applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project and the City of Huntington Beach and shall incorporate the following: (PW) 1) The City will have the option (the "Option") to enter into a water purchase agreement ("Water Purchase Agreement")to purchase water from the Project on terms essentially the same as all of the other water purchase agreements for the Project; provided, however that the City's price for up to 3,360 acre-feet per year(3 million gallons per day or 4.6 cubic feet per second) of the water purchased from the Project will be equal to the combination of(1) a 5% discount on the purchase price of water supplied by MWD via the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and (2) any subsidy received by the City from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California or any other third party for the purchase of water from the Project such as, but not limited to, MWDOC; and provided further that the City's price will not exceed the purchase price for Project water in the other water purchase agreements for the Project. 2) The City will have the first right to purchase up to an additional 4,000,000 gallons per day (6.1 CFS) of additional water from the Project during a declared water emergency at the same costs as above for not to exceed seven days in any 30 day period and not to exceed 28,000,000 gallons in any one emergency event.. The definition of a declared water emergency is a 50% or greater loss of overall City water supply (not including droughts) or connected facilities such as distribution system, booster stations, reservoirs, wells and imported connections causing a reduction of at least 50% of the City's water supply. c. The applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project will enter into an Amended and.Restated Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) approved and executed by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach. (EDD) d. The applicant shall conduct and submit to the Planning and Building Department an additional noise study at the project design stage and include sound level sampling at approximately 3 a.m. The applicant shall attenuate project generated noise with the intent being to avoid a perceptible increase in noise at the nearest residential property, but allowing up to a 5 dBA increase above the nighttime ambient noise levels at the nearest residential property line based on noise levels determined in the design level noise study. 5. The structures cannot be occupied, the final building permits cannot be approved, utilities cannot be released, the use cannot commence, and the Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued until the following has been completed: The applicant shall demonstrate that all measures required by these conditions to protect the nearby wetlands have been implemented. 6. During demolition, remediation, grading, site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Construction equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. b. Use low sulfur(0.5%) diesel fuel by weight in all diesel equipment. c. Shut off engines when not in use. d. Attempt to phase and schedule activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts. e. Discontinue operation during second stage smog alerts. f. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. g. Discovery of additional contamination/pipelines, etc. must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly. (FD) 7. The applicant shall completely remove the storage tanks from the site within 12 months from the date of approval of City building permits and agreements. 8. No parking shall be permitted on the south side of Edison Ave. (PW) 9. With the development of the proposed Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Facility, the applicant/operator of the project will deliver potable water to the City from a location within the project site, specifically the proposed Tank Storage site. The applicant/operator of the project shall provide a water pipeline from the tank storage site, a bypass water pipeline and located within the booster pump station, two pump cans including base plates, baffles, steal discharge heads, and suction manifolds per City requirements and specification. (PW) 10. The applicant shall keep the facility under video surveillance 24 hours per day every day. Videos should be saved for at least 30 days to provide Police with the recording.(PD) 11. Post clear signage describing the acceptable behavior allowed and uses of the facility. Signs should also make it clear that there is 24/7 video surveillance.(PD) 12. The administration building should be clearly marked to help visitors.(PD) 13. The entire facility should be lighted throughout all hours of darkness, but must conform to the lighting requirements of Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001.(PD) 14. The project shall comply with the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001. 15. The Planning and Building Department Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning and Building Department Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning and Building Department Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the City Council may be required pursuant to the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. 16. The applicant and applicant's representatives shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for review and approval. 17. The applicant/property owner and each successor in interest to the property which is the subject of this project shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the City, City Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 18. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Energy Minimization and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan attached as Appendix W to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report. 19. Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 and Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 shall become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of final approval by the City Council, or within two years of the date of final Coastal Development Permit approval by the Coastal Commission if the Coastal Development Permit is appealed, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning and Building Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. PUBLIC HEARING/ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS 6-1. Approve Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 10-014 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-130 for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project TPM Continued from September 7, 2010 Recommended Action: A)Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 to permit the Seawater Desalination Project with staff recommended findings and conditions of approval; and, B) Rescind Coastal Development Permit,No. 02-05; and, C) Ratify City Council's approval at its September 7, 2010 meeting of Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04; the Exchange Agreement and Escrow Instructions between the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC for properties located south of Edison Avenue and east of Newland Street; and the Pipeline Franchise Agreement with Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC to construct, own and operate a new water pipeline in the public right-of-way. Approved 5-0-2 (Coerper, Hardy absent) 6-2. Approve the Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC Continued from September 7, 2010 Redevelopment Agency Recommended Action: A) Waive the Resolution No. 214 requirement for thirty (30) day review of the Owner Participation Agreement; and, B) Approve the Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC; and, C) The City Council finds that the Final SEIR serves as adequate and appropriate environmental documentation for approval of the Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement. The City Council finds that the unavoidable significant adverse effects of the Project as identified in Section 5.0 of the Statement of Facts and Findings (growth inducement outside of Orange County and short-term construction related impacts in regards to air quality) have been lessened in their severity by the application of standard conditions, the inclusion of Project design features and the imposition of the mitigation measures. The City Council finds that the remaining unavoidable significant impacts are clearly outweighed by the economic, social, and other benefits of the Project, as set forth in the "Statement of Overriding Considerations" included as Section 7.0 of the Statement of Facts and Findings. The City Council adopts the recitation of overriding considerations which justify approval Action Agenda 9/20/10 Page 4 of 8 Council/Agency Meeting Held:_401A6 Deferred/Continued to: UApproved on. ignally roved LJ enied City Clerw,ls Signatu'r Council Meeting Date: September 20, 2010 Department ID Number: PL10-024 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Administrator PREPARED BY: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Building SUBJECT: Approve Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 10-014 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-130 for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration are Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 10-014 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-130 which pertain to the Seawater Desalination Project. CDP No. 10-014 is a request by Poseidon Resources Corporation to permit the construction and operation of a 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project on a +13 acre site. The project includes up to +4 miles of water transmission lines (±1 mile in the Coastal Zone) in Huntington Beach to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa. TPM No. 10-130 is an accompanying request to subdivide three parcels totaling ± 19.5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project. Staff is recommending approval of the project with modifications, consistent with the City Council's approval of Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) No. 10-001 on September 7, 2010. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Recommended Action: Motion to: A) Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 to permit the Seawater Desalination Project with staff recommended findings and conditions of approval; and, B) Rescind Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05; and, -1 87- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/20/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-024 C) Ratify City Council's approval at its September 7, 2010 meeting of Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04; the Exchange Agreement and Escrow Instructions between the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC for properties located south of Edison Avenue and east of Newland Street; and the Pipeline Franchise Agreement with Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC to construct, own and operate a new water pipeline in the public right-of- way. Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): A) "Deny Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 with findings for denial." B) "Continue Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 and direct staff accordingly." Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Poseidon Resources Corporation, 17011 Beach Blvd., Suite 900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Property Owners: AES HB, LLC, 21730 Newland St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646; City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main St., Huntington Beach, CA 92648; Various for off site improvements. Location: 21730 Newland (east side of Newland, south of Edison Ave.) and pipeline routes (Primary Route - along Newland, Hamilton, Brookhurst, and Adams and Alternative Routes —further north along Newland, Brookhurst, and Warner) Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 represents a request by Poseidon Resources Corporation pursuant to Chapter 245 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) to permit the construction and operation of a 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project on a ±13 acre site. The project includes up to ±4 miles of water transmission lines (±1 mile in the Coastal Zone) in Huntington Beach to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa. Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 represents a request pursuant to Chapter 251 of the HBZSO to subdivide three parcels totaling ± 19.5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project. In 2006 the City Council approved CDP No. 02-05 which permitted the seawater desalination project. Poseidon has now applied for CDP No. 10-014 to replace CDP No. 02-05 and implement a modified seawater desalination project as reflected in "Recommended Action B." In addition, the City Council is also being asked to ratify all of the approvals granted to Poseidon at the September 7, 2010 hearing pursuant to "Recommended Action C." -1 BB- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/20/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-024 In comparison to the previously approved plans, the revised plans now reflect: The project being sited north of the previously approved location by incorporating the adjacent city tank site in addition to AES property to create an ±8.6 acre parcel; The proposed 30 foot tall water storage tank is still in the same location as previously approved on the corner of Newland and Edison on a ±3.5 acre parcel; ® The project's architectural design has changed slightly but is comparable to the previous approval and incorporates the same colors, though an exterior finish system (i.e. stucco appearance) has been eliminated; and ® Revised height and size (still in compliance with the HBZSO) for some structures as noted in the following matrix listing all proposed structures including a comparison to the previously approved project: 2005 2010 Architecture Architecture Ht. Ht. Area ft Area(SF) ft SF BUILDINGS SOLIDS HANDLING AND BUILDING 21' 7,590 25' 1,760 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 18, 10,120 20' 5,000 R.O. BUILDING 25' 38,090 35' 34,727 ELECTRICAL BUILDING 12' 900 35' 4,840 SUBTOTAL BUILDINGS 56,700 46,327 TANKS AND STRUCTURES OUTDOOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Substation 12' 900 12' 23,541 ® (19,600) e Switch Gear (960) o Transformers (2,176) s Product Water Pump Station (805) Electrical PRETREATMENT FILTER STRUCTURE 16' 38,270 28' 59,550 CHEMICAL STORAGE TANKS & 23' 4,368 CARBON DIOXIDE TANKS 8' 1,482 24' 2,100 FLUSH/WASH TANK 19, 1,590 23' 605 RINSE TANK 29' 491 -- -- PRODUCT WATER STORAGE TANK 30' 36,305 30' 49,481 AMMONIA/FLOURIDE STORAGE TANK 6' 28 12' 558 LIME SILOS 26' 4,560 -- -- INFLUENT PUMP STATION -- 1,880 20' 2,184 POST-TREATMENT TANKS -- -- 27' 5,250 PRODUCT WATER PUMP STATION -- 650 20' 4,176 SURGE TANK -- 312 14' 408 SUBTOTAL TANKS AND STRUCTURES 90,836 147,853 TOTAL,BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES 147,536 194,180 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/20/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-024 The project still includes up to +4 miles of water transmission lines (±1 mile in the Coastal Zone) in Huntington Beach to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa. Two off-site underground booster pump stations and modifications to an existing booster pump station (all outside the Coastal Zone) would be needed as part of this primary water transmission route. As part of the revised project the proposal now includes pipeline design variations and optional routes and pump stations that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options. The desalination project proposes to now either take screened seawater from the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) discharge pipeline or pump seawater as a stand alone facility using the HBGS intake pipeline, if the HBGS stops using once-through cooling, and purify it using reverse osmosis to produce drinking water. The project still proposes to use up to 100 MGD of seawater to produce 50 MGD of drinking water for use in Orange County. The remaining 50 MGD of concentrated seawater will be blended with the remainder of the HBGS cooling water or with 52 MGD of dilution seawater in the stand alone condition and discharged via the existing HBGS outfall pipe extending approximately 1,500 feet offshore. Pipelines will still be constructed on the existing HBGS site to connect the proposed desalination project to the existing HBGS ocean intake and discharge pipeline. No changes are proposed to the coastal/marine portion of the existing HBGS intake and outfall. As with the previously approved plans, an underground water transmission line will be constructed from the desalination project to the closest regional distribution line located in Costa Mesa. The segment located within Huntington Beach will be approximately four miles long, one mile of which will be within the Coastal Zone boundary, and will be located entirely within the existing public right-of-way along Newland Street, Hamilton Avenue and potentially Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue. The property where the various buildings, tanks, and other structures are proposed is presently developed with three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and a concrete containment berm. All three tanks as well as the interior portions of the 10 to 12 foot high concrete berm are proposed to be demolished to allow for the proposed structures. The site will be remediated to address any contamination from the previous use. The facilities will operate 24 hours, seven days a week and will have a total staff of 12 to 18 with shift size varying. The applicant has indicated that the request is necessary to provide a new water supply source into the area that is reliable and drought proof. B. BACKGROUND In September 2005 the City Council certified Recirculated Environmental Impact Report No. 00-02 and in February 2006 approved Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04/Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 for the construction and operation of the seawater desalination project. Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 is currently on appeal at the Coastal Commission. On September 7, 2010 the City Council certified Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 10-001 and approved EPA No. 10-001 (amended Conditional Use Permit No. 02- 04), an Exchange Agreement with Escrow Instructions, and a Franchise Agreement for the -190- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/20/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-024 project. The Tentative Parcel Map was continued to allow for a new Coastal. Development Permit to be assigned based on correspondence from the California Coastal Commission. C. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The analysis of the project's land use compatibility, site layout, circulation, street dedication/improvement, water transmission line, other project impacts, aesthetics, and benefits/disadvantages to the city are discussed in the September 7, 2010 Request for City Council Action staff report on Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 included as Attachment No. 2 to this report. The analysis below focuses on the Coastal Development Permit and Tentative Parcel Map. Coastal Development Permit The project as proposed and with staff suggested conditions of approval and code requirements, conforms to the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program by implementation of the Coastal Element goals, objective, and policies as identified in Attachment No. 1 to this report (Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval). The proposed use is consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan designation of P (Public) for the site because it will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, and it is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities. The proposed use is compatible and consistent with the properties immediately surrounding the subject site and meets the requirements of the Coastal Element. The project will improve the appearance of the area by demolishing three existing unused 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and replacing them with lower profile, modern, and more attractive structures. The proposed structures vary in height from a maximum of 35 feet for the water tank to a minimum of 12 feet high for the ammonia tank. The proposed desalination project will not impact public views to the coast. There are limited views across the HBGS site due to the height of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures will have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished. A 10 foot and 20 foot planter along the street frontage on Edison and Newland respectively will further improve the appearance of the project with attractive landscaping. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, O Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The project meets or exceeds all minimum development standards including but not limited to setbacks, height, parking, and lot size/width. The project is required to comply with all city codes and requirements. The project conforms to the City's Design Guidelines and incorporates variations in form, building details, colors, and materials that create visual interest. The project provides buffering from sensitive uses such as residential developments through landscaping, a block wall, and increased setbacks. The perimeter wall is designed in a manner to create an attractive appearance and will be consistent with the wall design approved for the portion of the HBGS property to the south for a cohesive appearance. The project meets all the applicable requirements for the CZ overlay district. The project preserves and improves existing visual resources and complies with maximum height limitations, off-street parking requirements, landscaping requirements, and other requirements. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/20/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-024 At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. The proposed project is an infill development, which as conditioned and with the implementation of all mitigation measures will provide all necessary infrastructure to adequately service the site and not impact adjacent development. This includes dedication and improvements to the project frontage along Edison Avenue to improve circulation in the area. The development of the desalination project and approximately one mile of water transmission lines within the Coastal Zone conforms to the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act as they will not impede any public access to the coast and public recreation opportunities in the area. All public access to the coast and public recreation in the area will not be impeded during the long-term operation of the facility as well as during the construction process with the implementation of conditions of approval and mitigation measures. The site does not currently provide public access or public recreation opportunities because of the nature of the historic uses at the site. The site is located landward of Pacific Coast Highway and is currently not accessible to the beach and would not provide a connection to the coast or public recreation opportunities, as it is virtually surrounded by industrial, utility or commercial uses. Nonetheless, because no public access or recreational opportunities currently exist on the site, the project will not impede existing public access to the coast or public recreation opportunities in the area. The project will not impact any existing public parking or beach access and will not discourage or impact any existing lower cost visitor and recreational facilities. The proposed project will not impede any unique water-oriented activities, nor does it involve any oceanfront land suitable for recreational use. The project involves the use of private lands that are not suitable for visitor-serving commercial recreational facilities. Even if the lands were suitable for such visitor-serving uses, the project proposes a coastal-dependent use, which is not of a lower priority than visitor-serving uses. Tentative Parcel Map With staff suggested conditions and code requirements TPM No. 10-130 proposes four parcels that will comply with all requirements of the General Plan and Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance including, but not limited to, minimum lot size, lot width, and landscaping. The proposed parcels can adequately accommodate development consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations on the parcels. The proposed parcel configuration and topography are suitable for the proposed seawater desalination project. The TPM includes the required street dedications to improve access to the area. D. SUMMARY Staff recommends that the City Council approve CDP No. 10-014 and TPM No. 10-130 subject to conditions based on the following: ® The project is compatible with surrounding uses and is buffered from residential and other sensitive uses by significant setbacks, perimeter landscaping, and fencing. -192- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/20/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-024 ® The project will improve the appearance of the area by demolishing three existing unused 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and replacing them with lower profile, modern, and more attractive structures. ® The proposed structures are in substantial compliance with the Design Guidelines by employing varied building form, architectural details, and colors that create visual interest. The design is carried through all the structures including the architectural screen for the tanks to achieve a unified theme. This coupled with the 10 foot (Edison) to 20 foot (Newland) perimeter landscape planter and screen wall will enhance the overall appearance of the site compared to the existing condition. ® The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of P (Public) for the site. ® The project is consistent with General Plan and Coastal Element goals, objectives, and policies. ■ The project conforms to the requirements of the Coastal Zone Overlay and will not impede access to the coast or any public recreation opportunities in the area. • The proposed parcels comply with-the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and are suitable for the proposed project. Environmental Status: The project's potential environmental impacts were analyzed in Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 10-001 which was certified by the City Council on September 7, 2010. Strategic Plan Goal: Maintain financial viability and our reserves Attachment(s): 0. 1. Suciaested Findings and Conditions of Approval 2. September 7, 2010 City Council Staff Report on Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 3. Zoning Compliance Matrix 4. Site plans, floor plans, elevations, landscaping plan, and pipeline alignment dated August 12, 2010 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 dated August 11, 2010 5. Project Narrative dated August 11, 2010 6. Code Requirements List for informational purposes only. 7. PowerPoint Presentation -193- ATTACHMENT # 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 10-014/ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130: 1. Tentative Parcel Map (TPM)No. 10-130 to subdivide three parcels totaling+19.5 acres into four parcels is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property, or any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provisions of this Code. As modified by conditions and code requirements TPM No. 10-130 proposes four parcels that will comply with all requirements of the General Plan and Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance including, but not limited to,minimum lot size, lot width, and landscaping. The proposed parcels can adequately accommodate development consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations on the parcels. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. As modified by conditions and code requirements the proposed parcels will comply with, among others, minimum lot size, lot width, and landscaping requirements within the PS (Public-Semipublic) zoning district. The proposed parcel configuration and topography are suitable for the proposed development. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat with the exception of significant unavoidable impacts relating to short term construction air quality impacts and growth inducing impacts outside of Orange County. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Council approves the tentative parcel map because Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR)No. 10-001 was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made that specific economic, social or other considerations outweigh any impacts that cannot be avoided. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. There are no public access or use easements within the proposed parcel map. 5. The Final SEIR certified for the project on September 7, 2010 serves as adequate and appropriate environmental documentation for approval of TPM 10-130. The unavoidable significant adverse effects of the project as identified in Section 5.0 of the Statement of Facts and Findings (growth inducement outside of Orange County and short-term construction related impacts in regards to air quality)have been lessened in their severity by the application of standard code requirements, conditions, the inclusion of project design features and the imposition of the mitigation measures. The remaining unavoidable significant impacts are clearly outweighed by the economic, social, and other benefits of the project, as set forth in the "Statement of Overriding Considerations" included as Section 7.0 of the Statement of Facts and Findings. The City Council adopts the recitation of overriding considerations which justify approval of the project notwithstanding certain unavoidable significant environmental effects which cannot feasibly be substantially mitigated as set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -195- Attachment No. 1.1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL — COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 10- 014 (REPLACING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 02-05): 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 to permit the construction and operation of a 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project on a +13 acre site including up to±4 miles of water transmission lines (+1 mile in the Coastal Zone) in Huntington Beach to connect to a regional transmission system in Costa Mesa and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 to facilitate the development of the project as proposed and modified by conditions of approval and code requirements, conforms to the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program by implementation of the following Coastal Element goals, objective, and policies: a. Objective C1.1 (p. IV-C-106): Ensure that adverse impacts associated with coastal zone development are mitigated or minimized to the greatest extent feasible. The project is consistent with this objective because all of the project's potential adverse impacts have either been mitigated or they have been minimized to the greatest extent feasible. This objective has been met on an impact-by-impact basis as demonstrated in the Subsequent EIR certified in connection with the project, as supported by substantial evidence in the record, and as documented in the Statement of Facts and Findings. The severity of certain adverse impacts (growth inducement outside of Orange County and short-term construction related impacts in regards to air quality) have been lessened by the application of standard code requirements, conditions, the inclusion of project design features and the imposition of mitigation, but it has not been feasible to minimize those impacts to a level of insignificance. Consequently, those impacts have been mitigated to the greatest extent feasible and a statement of overriding considerations has been adopted (see, Statement of Facts and Findings). b. Policy C 1.1.1 (p. IV-C-106): With the exception of hazardous industrial development, new development shall be encouraged to be located within, contiguous or in close proximity to, existing developed areas able to accommodate it or, where such areas are not able to accommodate it, in other areas with adequate public services, and where it will not have significant adverse effects, either individually or cumulatively, on coastal resources. The project is consistent with this policy because it is proposed on a site that is already developed and will be in close proximity to the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station and the Station's existing seawater intake which will be able to accommodate the project. Pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. c. Policy C1.1.2 (p. IV-C-106): Coastal dependent developments shall have priority over other developments on or near the shoreline. Coastal-related developments--should be accommodated within reasonable proximity of the coastal-dependent uses they support. The project would be a coastal-dependent development because it would need to be sited on or adjacent to the sea in order to function at all. Seawater desalination facilities like the project fall within the Coastal Act's definition of coastal dependent because such facilities require "a site on, or adjacent to the sea" in order to draw seawater into the facility, which is the only source water CDP 10-0141TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -196- Attachment No. 1.2 that this project will use to produce potable desalinated water. The project's location adjacent to the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station and proximate to its existing seawater intake is consistent with provisions in the Commission's 2004 report "Seawater Desalination and the California Coastal Act,"which noted that desalination facilities sited near existing water distribution systems can mitigate potential adverse impacts and avoid additional infrastructure build out and growth that may be associated with such a build out. Further, seawater desalination facilities like the project are similar to-other recognized coastal dependent uses that must be located adjacent to the sea to function, such as electric generating facilities, refineries, and offshore drilling for oil and gas. Thus,the project as located is consistent with this policy. d. Policy C 1.2.1 - Accommodate existing uses and new development in accordance with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan and the Development and Density Schedule Table C-1 The project is consistent with this policy because it is consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan and Density Schedule. e. Policy C1.2.3 (p. IV-C-108): Prior to the issuance of development entitlement, the City shall - make the finding that adequate services (i.e., water, sewer, roads, etc.) can be provided to serve the proposed development, consistent with the policies contained in the Coastal Element, at the time of occupancy. The project is consistent with this policy because adequate services can be provided to serve the proposed development, consistent with the policies contained in the Coastal Element. Section 4.6 of the Subsequent EIR details the availability of all required public services for the proposed development. The project will convey water to the regional distribution system through an approximately 10 mile pipeline including four miles of new pipeline in the City of Huntington Beach. The portions of the pipeline in the City will be built in the public street right of way and is subject to the terms in the pipeline Franchise Agreement between Poseidon Resources and the City of Huntington Beach and approved by the Huntington Beach City Council on September 7, 2010. Connection to the regional distribution system through the City of Costa Mesa will utilize an existing water pipeline known as the OC-44 , which will be upgraded to a 48 to 54 inch diameter pipe. The OC- 44 pipeline is jointly owned by the City of Huntington Beach and the Mesa Consolidated Water District. f. Objective C3.1 (p. IV-C-113): Preserve, protect and enhance, where feasible, existing public recreation sites in the Coastal Zone. The project is consistent with this objective because, as discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, the limited area affected by salinities caused by the project that are higher than 40 ppt would not represent substantial ecological effects or degradation of water quality due to the absence of areas of special biological significance or the presence of threatened or endangered species. Specifically, benthic areas affected by project discharge do not support sensitive species, species that encounter elevated salinity will have very low exposure times, foraging areas affected would not be substantial, and no threatened or endangered species or kelp beds exist within the vicinity of the existing outfall. Furthermore, fishes with high commercial or recreational CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -1 97- Attachment No. 1.3 importance are very uncommon in the intake source water. In addition, the project is anticipated to have a negligible impact on parks and recreation facilities, and will be required to pay development impact fees prior to the issuance of grading permits. (See Subsequent EIR Section 4.6.) g. Policy C4.2.1 (p. IV-C-119): Ensure that the following minimum standards are met by new development in the Coastal Zone as feasible and appropriate: Preservation of public views to and from the bluffs, to the shoreline and ocean and to the wetlands; Adequate landscaping and vegetation; Evaluation of project design regarding visual impact and compatibility; and Incorporate landscaping to mask oil operations and major utilities, such as the electrical power plant on Pacific Coast Highway. The project is consistent with this policy because the project plans include a number of measures to minimize adverse visual effects of the proposed facility. The facility would be comprised of relatively low profile buildings reaching approximately 35 feet above the existing grade, which is below the 50-foot height limitation specified in the Zoning Code. The overall appearance would be similar to a commercial office building. As part of the facility design, both vegetative and architectural screening has been added to ensure that exposed pipelines, tanks, and other utility- type equipment are screened from public view. The project would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. h. Objective C 4.7 - Improve the appearance of visually degraded areas within the Coastal Zone. The project is consistent with this objective because it will be an improvement to the area by demolishing three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. The project is required to provide a 10 foot(Edison) and 20-foot (Newland) landscape planter along the perimeter of the site to enhance the appearance of the area. i. Policy C4.7.5 (p. IV-C-122): Require the review of new and/or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The project is consistent with this policy because the project will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. Proposed pipeline facilities are located within the coastal zone; however consistent with the Local Coastal Program, the facilities would be located below grade to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. j. Policy C4.7.8 (p. IV-C-122): Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 e1 98- Attachment No.1.4 The project is consistent with this policy because exterior berms will remain in place, landscaping is proposed along the Edison and Newland project frontages and architectural screening is provided for proposed tanks and structures. k. Policy C4.7.9 (p. IV-C-122): Require the removal of non-productive oil production facilities and the restoration of the vacated site. The project will replace a dilapidated fuel oil storage tank and will restore the site, substantially improving the existing visual character of the site. 1. Policy C6.1.1 (p. IV-C-124): Require that new development include mitigation measures to enhance water quality, if feasible; and, at a minimum, prevent the degradation of water quality of groundwater basins, wetlands, and surface water. The project is consistent with this policy because it is subject to mitigation measures relating to water quality. The Subsequent EIR contains a_number of mitigation measures designed to prevent the degradation of and enhance water quality in groundwater basins,wetlands, surface water and product water. These mitigation measures are contained in the Subsequent EIR. As provided in Section 4.3 of the Subsequent EIR, the project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems, or contribute significant increases in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm, or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The project also will enhance water quality by removing bacteria from source water. In addition, the Project further will enhance water quality by reducing thermal footprint of the discharge from the power plant during the co-located operating condition. Moreover, neither the Project's discharge of trace amounts of cleaning compounds nor the slightly increased salinity levels in the area will degrade the quality of ocean water surrounding the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station and the proposed desalination facility. The desalination facility will clean its reverse osmosis membranes with chemicals that are analogous to household cleaners. The initial rinse of the membrane cleaning solution will be treated at a wastewater treatment facility, and only the second rinse, which will contain trace amounts of cleaning compounds below detection limits for hazardous waste, will be discharged into the ocean after it is thoroughly diluted in water. As concluded in Appendix R to the Subsequent EIR(RO Membrane Cleaning Solution Discharge Test Stream Data), even before dilution,the vast majority of the chemicals within the membrane cleaning solution would be either below detection levels or regulatory limits. Dilution of these substances will even further minimize the already less than significant impacts on the local marine environment. The Subsequent EIR analyzed the potential impacts of the project on ocean water quality. Based on the analysis contained in the Subsequent EIR, no mitigation measures are required to protect or enhance ocean water quality. (See SEIR Section 4.10.) Specifically, the Subsequent EIR found that there would be no degradation of water quality and there was not a reasonable potential for acute toxicity effects to occur at or below a seawater concentration of 40 ppt. The slightly elevated salinity level of the project's seawater discharge in the co-located operating scenario CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 e1 99- Attachment No. 1.5 achieves compliance with the project's approved NPDES Order No. R8-2006-0034 and the standards established in the Order and the water quality objectives established within the Ocean Plan. NPDES Order No. R8-2006-0034 establishes a 1,000 foot Zone of Initial Dilution (ZID) and a dilution factor of 7.5:1 or greater that must be met at the edge of the ZID. Further, most marine species in the water around Huntington Beach are also found in geographic regions that naturally have a salinity range comparable to or greater than what is predicted in the ZID. See Appendix O to EIR (Marine Biological Considerations Related to the Reverse Osmosis Desalination Project at the Applied Energy Sources Huntington Beach Generation Station). The stand-alone operating condition would comply with the standards and 7.5:1 dilution factor established in Order No. R8-2006-0034 and comply with Ocean Plan standards. Similar to the co- located condition, the limited area affected by salinities higher than 40 ppt would not represent substantial ecological effects or degradation of water quality due to the absence of areas of special biological significance or the presence of threatened or endangered species. Further, dewatering discharge during project construction would be directed to a desilting system, and would be sampled and tested periodically to ensure compliance with all NPDES regulations and with De minimus Permit requirements (Order No. R8-208-0003 (CAG 9980)). Should contaminated groundwater be encountered, mitigation measures require groundwater remediation prior to any discharge into the sanitary sewer system. The maximum dewatering volume associated with desalination facility construction will be over five times smaller than the groundwater"draw" volume associated with natural daily tidal fluctuations to which the wetlands are exposed. Despite the fact that it is highly unlikely for dewatering operations to have an effect on the nearby wetlands and structures, a monitoring well system will be installed and operated for the duration of the project construction period in order to ascertain that construction activities do not have any measurable impacts on groundwater quality or levels outside of the boundaries of the desalination facility site. The measured water level will be compared to the water level in a control groundwater monitoring well that is outside of the desalination facility site in order to confirm that groundwater level in the wetlands is not influenced by the dewatering operations. Thus, dewatering activities due to project construction are not anticipated to have significant impacts in regards to hydrogeology and water quality. in. Policy C6.1.2 (p. IV-C-124): Marine resources shall be maintained, enhanced, and where feasible, restored. Special protection shall be given to areas and species of special biological or economic significance. The project is consistent with this policy because, as discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, the limited area affected by salinities caused by the project that are higher than 40 ppt would not represent substantial ecological effects or degradation of water quality due to the absence of areas of special biological significance or the presence of threatened or endangered species. Specifically, benthic areas affected by project discharge do not support sensitive species, species that encounter elevated salinity will have very low exposure times, foraging areas affected would not be substantial, and no threatened or endangered species or kelp beds exist within the vicinity - of the existing outfall. Thus, there are no areas or species requiring special protection. Studies of desalination facility entrainment and impingement analyzed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR also show that the project will result in less than significant entrainment and CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 v200m Attachment No. 1.6 impingement impacts and therefore will not conflict with this policy. The most frequently entrained species by the existing Huntington Beach Generating station are very abundant in the area of the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake and the Southern California Bight, and therefore actual ecological effects due to any additional entrainment from the desalination facility under co-located operating conditions are insignfiiant, and the loss of marine organisms due to the project's potential entrainment will have no effect on the species' ability to sustain their populations. Moreover, species with high commercial and recreational importance, such as California halibut and rockfishes, were shown to be very uncommon in the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake flows, and therefore the project would not adversely impact species of special significance. Project entrainment under stand-alone conditions is similarly less than significant and impacts on marine organisms resulting from the project are relatively small,would not substantially reduce populations of affected species, or affect the ability of the affected species to sustain their populations. With respect to impingement, under co-located operating conditions the project would not increase the volume or velocity of the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station cooling water intake and thus would not increase the number of impingement losses caused by that intake and would avoid impingement impacts that would result from the implementation of a new intake structure. Under stand-alone operating conditions, the project would result in an estimated average daily impingement of 0.9 pounds per day, which is less than the daily diet of one brown sea. For the Carlsbad Desalination Project, Coastal Commission determined of impingement of more than twice this amount was de minimus and insignificant. The Huntington Beach Generating Station's existing velocity cap and bar racks on the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake would remain in place during stand-alone operating conditions, which serve to substantially reduce impingement of marine mammals and sea turtles. Studies on the effectiveness of the HBGS' velocity cap have shown impingement reductions as high as 90%1. Based on impingement measurements discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, project impingement would not result in substantial reductions in fish or shellfish operations, and it is not anticipated that project impingement losses would have any effects on the ability of impinged species to sustain their populations. Moreover, the project is not within an Area of Special Biological Significance, and the low flows projected for the stand-alone operating condition indicate that stand-alone project impingement may be lower than impingement caused by existing Huntington Beach Generating Station operations. m Policy C6.1.3 (p. IV-C-124): Uses of the marine environment shall be carried out in a manner that will sustain the biological productivity of coastal waters and that will maintain healthy populations of all species of marine organisms adequate for long-term commercial, recreational, scientific and educational purposes. The project is consistent with this policy because, as discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, the limited area affected by salinities caused by the project that are higher than 40 ppt would not represent substantial ecological effects or degradation of water quality due to the absence of areas of special biological significance or the presence of threatened or endangered species. Specifically, benthic areas affected by project discharge do not support sensitive species, species Water Quality Control Policy for the use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling, Final Substitute Environmental Document (SED pg. 100) CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -201 m Attachment No. 1.7 that encounter elevated salinity will have very low exposure times, foraging areas affected would not be substantial, and no threatened or endangered species or kelp beds exist within the vicinity of the existing outfall. Furthermore, fishes with high commercial or recreational importance are very uncommon in the intake source water. Studies of desalination facility entrainment and impingement analyzed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR also show that the project will result in less than significant entrainment and impingement impacts and therefore will not conflict with this policy. The most frequently entrained species by the existing Huntington Beach Generating station are very abundant in the area of the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake and the Southern California Bight, and therefore actual ecological effects due to any additional entrainment from the desalination facility under co-located operating conditions are insignficiant, and the loss of marine organisms due to the project's potential entrainment will have no effect on the species' ability to sustain their populations. Moreover, species with high commercial and recreational importance, such as California halibut and rockfishes, were shown to be very uncommon in the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake flows, and therefore the project would not adversely impact species of special significance. Project entrainment under stand-alone conditions is similarly less than significant and impacts on marine organisms resulting from the project are relatively small,would not substantially reduce populations of affected species, or affect the ability of the affected species to sustain their populations. With respect to impingement, under co-located operating conditions the project would not increase the volume or velocity of the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station cooling water intake and thus would not increase the number of impingement losses caused by that intake and would avoid impingement impacts that would result from the implementation of a new intake structure. Under stand-alone operating conditions, the project would result in an estimated average daily impingement of 0.9 pounds per day, which is less than the daily diet of one brown sea pelican. For the Carlsbad Desalination Project, Coastal Commission determined of impingement of more than twice this amount was de minimus and insignificant. The Huntington Beach Generating Station's existing velocity cap and bar racks on the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake would remain in place during stand-alone operating conditions, which serve to substantially reduce impingement of marine mammals and sea turtles. Studies on the effectiveness of the HBGS' velocity cap have shown impingement reductions as high as 90%2. Based on impingement measurements discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, project impingement would not result in substantial reductions in fish or shellfish operations, and it is not anticipated that project impingement losses would have any effects on the ability of impinged species to sustain their populations. Moreover, the project is not within an Area of Special Biological Significance, and the low flows projected for the stand-alone operating condition indicate that stand-alone project impingement may be lower than impingement caused by existing Huntington Beach Generating Station operations. Thus, healthy populations of all species of marine organisms that may be affected by project operations would be maintained. z Ibid. CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -202- Attachment No. 1.8 o. Policy C6.1.4: The biological productivity and the quality of coastal waters, streams, wetlands, estuaries and lakes appropriate to maintain organisms and for the protection of human health shall be maintained, and where feasible, restored. The project is consistent with this policy because, as provided in the findings for Policies C6.1.1 and 6.1.3, the project would not degrade water quality or adversely affect biological productivity. p. Policy C6.1.12 (p. IV-C-127): Periodically review the City's policies on water conservation, including the Water Conservation Ordinance, to ensure the use of state of the art conservation measures for new development and redevelopment, and retrofitting of existing development, where feasible and appropriate, to implement these measures. The project is consistent with this policy because as a user of potable water provided by the City of Huntington Beach, the project must comply with all applicable requirements of the Water Conservation Ordinance. (See Municipal Code Chapter 14.18.) q. Policy C6.1.13 (p. IV-C-127): Encourage research and feasibility studies regarding ocean water -- desalinization as an alternative source of potable water. Participate in regional studies and efforts where appropriate. The project does not conflict with this policy as it is a seawater desalination facility intended to provide an alternative source of potable water. r. Policy C6.1.19 (p. IV-C-128): Prior to approval of any new or expanded seawater pumping facilities, require the provision of maximum feasible mitigation measures to minimize damage to marine organisms due to entrainment in accordance with state and federal law. Application of CEQA significance thresholds results in a determination that the seawater desalination facility would not cause significant adverse impacts to marine life due to entrainment when it operates in either the co-located operating condition, or in the stand-alone operating condition. Sections 30230 and 30231 of the California Coastal Act (Coastal Act) require generally that marine resources be maintained, enhanced, and where feasible, restored. They also require that the marine environment be used in a manner that sustains biological productivity and maintains healthy populations of all marine species. The Subsequent EIR concluded that under either the co-located or stand-alone operating condition that the desalination project would not substantially reduce populations of affected species such that the sustainability of the affected species could not be maintained. As discussed in Section 4.10 of the Subsequent EIR, the most frequently entrained species by the existing Huntington Beach Generating station are very abundant in the area of the Huntington Beach Generating Station intake and the Southern California Bight, and therefore actual ecological effects due to any additional entrainment from the desalination facility under co-located operating conditions are insignificant, and the loss of marine organisms due to the project's potential entrainment will have no effect on the species' ability to sustain their populations. Project entrainment under stand-alone conditions is similarly less than significant and impacts on marine organisms resulting from the project are relatively small, would not substantially reduce populations of affected species, or affect the ability of the affected species to sustain their populations. Further, there are no threatened or endangered species in the desalination project's source water and the project is not within an Area of Special Biological CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -203- Attachment No. 1.9 Significance. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the project would conflict with these policies or the LCP. It should also be noted that the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station intake is fitted with a velocity cap and barracks which serve to substantially reduce impingement effects, as noted in the discussion of project design features in Subsequent EIR Section 3.4. These features serve to avoid impingement of larger fishes and organisms such as marine mammals and sea turtles, and would remain in place. Therefore it is not anticipated that impingement of marine mammals or sea turtles would result from operation of the desalination facility. Studies on the effectiveness of the HBGS' velocity cap have shown impingement reductions as high as 90%3. Thus it is not anticipated that the project would conflict with provisions of the Water Code requiring that new industrial facilities using seawater for processing must use the best available site, design, technology and mitigation feasible to minimize intake and mortality of marine life. (See Water Code Section 13142.5(b).) s. Policy C7.1.3 (p. IV-C-129): Development in areas adjacent to environmentally sensitive habitat areas and parks and recreation areas sball be sited and designed to prevent impacts which would significantly degrade those areas, and shall be compatible with the continuance of those habitat and recreation areas. The project has been intentionally located, and additional mitigation measures have been crafted, to avoid any significant environmental impacts to the Magnolia Marsh wetland area situated to the southeast of the project site. (See SEIR Section 4.9.) The project will be separated from coastal wetlands by significant setbacks and existing containment berms, which will keep storm water onsite. In addition, the desalination facility will feature an onsite local storm water drainage system, which will include catch basins that will collect any potential runoff that is contained by the existing berms and then direct it to a storm water pump via gravity lines. The project is conditioned to incorporate applicable Best Management Practices in order to contain stormwater runoff and will be in compliance with all standards as administered by the State Water Resources Control Board and County of Orange. Further, the project will be graded so that all onsite stormwater will flow away from the wetland area and toward the local drainage system. Any outdoor lighting will have limited intensity and be directed away from the sky and adjacent wetlands. The project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems, or contribute significant increases in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm, or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. (See SEIR Section 4.3.) Although no significant impacts have been identified, mitigation measures ensure adequate sizing and design of the stormwater drainage system. Accordingly, the project is consistent with this policy because it includes significant setbacks from the areas discussed in this policy, is further buffered by existing berms and proposed landscaping, and is subject to mitigation measures to ensure that runoff will not adversely affect these areas. In s Ibld, CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 _204- Attachment No. 1.10 addition,pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. t. Policy C7.1.4 (p. IV-C-130): Require that new development contiguous to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitat areas include buffer zones. Buffer zones shall be a minimum of one hundred feet setback from the landward edge of the wetland, with the exception of the following: A lesser buffer may be permitted if existing development or site configuration precludes a 100- foot buffer, or conversely, a greater buffer zone may be required if substantial development or significantly increased human impacts are anticipated. In either case, the following factors shall be considered when determining whether a lesser or wider buffer zone is warranted. Reduced buffer zone areas shall be reviewed by the Department of Fish and Game prior to implementation. (a) Biological significance of adjacent lands: The buffer should be sufficiently wide to protect the functional relationship between wetland and adjacent upland. (b) Sensitivity of species to disturbance: The buffer should be sufficiently wide to ensure that the most sensitive species will not be disturbed significantly by permitted development, based on habitat requirements of both resident and migratory species and the short and long term adaptability of various species to human disturbance. (c) Susceptibility of parcel-to erosion: The buffer should be sufficiently wide to allow for interception of any additional material eroded as a result of the proposed development based on soil and vegetative characteristics, slope and runoff characteristics, and impervious surface coverage. (d) Use of existing cultural features to located buffer zones: The buffer zone should be contiguous with the environmentally sensitive habitat area and make use of existing features such as roads, dikes, irrigation canals, and flood control channels where feasible. The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all of the minimum setback requirements included in Policy C7.1.4. A buffer zone in excess of 100 feet is not warranted because the proposed development is not substantial. Rather it is limited to the buildings, tanks, pipelines and appurtenances described in Section 3.4 of the Subsequent EIR which include project design features agreed to by the applicant (for example, noise attenuation features). Likewise, human impacts have not been significantly increased by the project because the proposed desalination facility would only employ an approximate total of 18 people. None of the factors that could result in requiring a greater buffer zone are present. The buffer zone provided by the project is sufficiently wide to protect the functional relationship between the nearby wetland and the upland, to protect the most sensitive species and to intercept any material eroded as a result of the proposed development. The buffer zone provided by the project makes use of existing features including without limitation the existing flood control channel and existing containment berms. Finally, even though a buffer zone in excess of 100 feet is not warranted, due to the project location the buffer zone provided by the project often exceeds 100 feet. u. Policy C7.1.5 (p. IV-C-130): Notify county, state, and federal agencies having regulatory authority in wetlands and other environmentally sensitive habitats when development projects in and adjacent to such areas are submitted to the City. The implementation of any Habitat Conservation Plan shall require an amendment to the Local Coastal Program. Incidental take of sensitive habitat and/or species that occurs in the context of development must be consistent with this LCP. CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -205- Attachment No. 1.11 The project does not conflict with this policy because it does not propose any development in wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitats, and would not result in the incidental take of sensitive habitats or species. v. Goal C8 (p. IV-C-131): Accommodate energy facilities with the intent to promote beneficial effects while mitigating any potential adverse effects. As part of this Coastal Development Permit and Poseidon's related entitlement applications, the project was reconfigured to accommodate potential future plans for the existing power plant either to expand or to switch to a different cooling system. Accordingly, the project does not conflict with this goal, because the project was reconfigured to accommodate the existing energy facility. w. Policy C8.2.4 (p. IV-C-132): Accommodate coastal dependent energy facilities within the Coastal Zone consistent with Sections 30260 through 30264 of the Coastal Act. The project is not an energy facility. The project is co-located with the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station. As provided in the finding for LCP Goal C8, the project was reconfigured to accommodate an existing energy facility and thus does not conflict with this policy. x. Policy C8.3.1 (p. IV-C-133): Promote the use of solar energy and encourage energy conservation. The project is consistent with this policy because the desalination facility buildings would accommodate potential solar panels on a roof surface of approximately 39,000 square feet, with the potential to generate approximately 606 MWh/yr of electricity. Moreover, the proposed project would incorporate high-efficiency design, green building design and would reduce energy that would otherwise be needed to pump 56,000 acre feet of water per year into Orange County. The project's Energy Minimization and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan specifically requires the desalination facility to incorporate on-site energy minimization features including numerous Project components designed to ensure that the Project will use only the minimum energy necessary. These include energy efficiency measures like the state of the art "pressure exchanger" energy recovery technology that allows recovery and reuse of 33.9% of the energy associated with desalination's reverse osmosis process, as well as high efficiency and premium efficiency motors and variable frequency drives on the intake water pumps to improve their efficiency. In addition, the project would avoid 175,000 MWh/yr of electricity consumption that would otherwise be required to deliver imported water to serve Orange County customers, and the Energy Minimization and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan requires Poseidon to entirely offset the project's net GHG emissions above the existing baseline for this water importation so that the project will not cause an increase in GHG emissions above the existing baseline. These energy minimization measures will reduce impacts to coastal resources that would have been caused through additional energy usage, and will minimize energy consumption consistent with Coastal Act section 30253(4) and other applicable Coastal Act and LCP policies The features of the project's Energy Minimization and Green House Gas Reduction Plan are consistent with the plan approved by the Coastal Commission as part of Poseidon's Carlsbad desalination plant's Coastal Development Permit. CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -206- Attachment No. 1.12 y. Policy C 10.1.4 (p. IV-C-136): Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand ground shaking and liquefaction such as those stated in the Uniform Building Code. The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all appropriate and applicable building standards related to ground shaking and liquefaction. The proposed desalination project is located within an unused fuel oil storage tank facility constructed in 1961 and formerly owned and operated by Southern California Edison. In addition to the proposed desalination facility site, the proposed project would also include several related off-site improvements, including tie-in pipelines between the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station condenser cooling water discharge system and the proposed desalination project, modifications to an existing pump station and up to approximately 4 miles of product water delivery pipelines within the city. The intake/discharge pipelines would be located entirely within the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station site. The majority of the product water delivery pipeline would be located within existing public streets, easements, or other rights-of-way in urban areas. As such, the proposed new development is located within existing developed areas. The proposed use is consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan designation of P (Public) for the site because it will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, and it is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities. Even though Poseidon will not be regulated by the Public Utilities Commission, Poseidon will sell the output of the desalination facility through wholesale contracts with retail water providers that are regulated by the state,public water agencies, and municipalities. Therefore, and as the City Planning and Building Department determined in a letter dated February 6, 2006, because the facility will be a wholesale supplier to regulated utilities,public water agencies and municipalities, and will provide much-needed water services to the public, it is properly classified as a public/semi-public use. Typical permitted uses within areas of the P (Public) designation include governmental administrative and related facilities, such as utilities, schools, public parking lots, infrastructure,religious, and similar uses. As the City Planning and Building Department has previously determined, use of the words and phrases "such as"' and "similar uses"provides evidence of an intent to provide for other land uses not explicitly listed under this category; therefore, the uses listed under Public (P) are not exclusive, but are examples. As an example, the Huntington Beach Generating Station site, which is also designated as Public (P), is an industrial electrical generating station that is not specifically cited in the list of permitted uses, but is nonetheless consistent with the General Plan designation. Thus, the desalination facility is compatible and consistent with the Land Use Plan designation of P (Public). In addition, the desalination facility site is zoned as Public-Semipublic with Oil and Coastal Zone Overlays (PS-0- CZ). This designation provides for similar uses to those allowed by the City of Huntington Beach General Plan. Included under Section 204.08(R) of the City's zoning code as acceptable uses under this zoning designation are "water or wastewater treatment plants... and similar facilities of public agencies or public utilities" (City of Huntington Beach 1997)._As of September 6, 2005, the Director of Planning and Building had determined pursuant to his authority under Section 204.02 of the zoning code that the desalination project is consistent with this zoning designation. Thus, the proposed use is compatible and consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan and the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, as well as with properties immediately surrounding the subject site and meets the requirements of the Land Use Plan and the Development and Density Schedule. CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -207- Attachment No. 1.13 The project will improve the appearance of the area by demolishing three existing unused 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and replacing them with lower profile, modern, and more attractive structures. The proposed structures vary in height from a maximum of 35 feet for the water tank to a minimum of 12 feet high for the ammonia tank. The proposed desalination project will not impact public views to the coast. There are limited views across the Huntington Beach Generating Station site due to the height of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures will have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished. A 10 foot and 20 foot planter along the street frontage on Edison and Newland respectively will further improve the appearance of the project with attractive landscaping. As conditioned, the project is required to prepare a final landscaping plan along Edison Avenue for approval by the Design Review Board that is consistent in design, colors and materials with the landscaping for Huntington Beach Generating Station for a cohesive appearance. In addition, the conditions of approval for the project require compliance with landscaping requirements for the project site, and that landscaping along the Newland and Edison lease area street frontages include the densest type and number of trees to provide the most effective screening possible, which must be maintained to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. Landscaping within-the eastern portion of the site will consist of native wetlands planting for compatibility with the wetlands to the southeast. In addition, the bottom portion of the structures will be hidden behind the existing berm along the perimeter. As noted above, the proposed structures are in substantial compliance with the Design Guidelines by employing variations in form, building details, colors, and materials that create visual interest, and the design is carried through all the structures including the architectural screen for the tanks to achieve a unified theme. The conditions of approval also require that utility meters be screened from public view and that backflow prevention devices be prohibited in the front yard setback and be screened from view. The conditions further require that all exterior mechanical equipment be screened from view on all sides, and that rooftop mechanical equipment be setback from the exterior edges of buildings. The Subsequent EIR analyzed the potential impacts of the project on water quality generally, as well as both ocean water quality and product water quality. Based on the analysis contained in the Subsequent EIR, no mitigation measures are required to protect or enhance ocean water quality. (See SEIR Section 4.10.) Specifically, the Subsequent EIR found that there would be no degradation of water quality and there was not a reasonable potential for acute toxicity effects to occur at or below a seawater concentration of 40 ppt. The slightly elevated salinity level of the project's seawater discharge in the co-located operating scenario achieves compliance with the project's approved NPDES Order No. R8-2006-0034 and the standards established in the Order and the water quality objectives established within the Ocean Plan. NPDES Order No. R8-2006-0034 establishes a 1,000 foot Zone of Initial Dilution (ZID) and a dilution factor of 7.5:1 or greater that must be met at the edge of the ZID. The stand-alone operating condition would have lower concentrations of seawater constituents than identified for the co-located condition. The elevated salinity levels anticipated for the desalination project in the stand-alone operation scenario would comply with the standards and 7.5:1 dilution factor established in Order No. R8-2006-0034 and comply with Ocean Plan standards. Similar to the CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -208- Attachment No. 1.14 co-located condition, the limited area affected by salinities higher than 40 ppt would not represent substantial ecological effects or degradation of water quality due to the absence of areas of special biological significance or the presence of threatened or endangered species. The Subsequent EIR contains a number of mitigation measures designed to prevent the degradation of and enhance water quality in groundwater basins,wetlands, surface water and product water. These mitigation measures are contained in the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the project. The Subsequent Environmental Impact Report analyzed under both co-located and stand alone operating scenarios the potential impacts to marine organisms due to impingement and entrainment and concluded that no mitigation measures were required. The Subsequent EIR noted that under the co-located operating scenario impingement and entrainment are the responsibility of the Huntington Beach Generating Station and that the proposed desalination facility does not directly take seawater from the ocean, and that withdrawal of feed water for desalination is from the Huntington Beach Generating Station cooling-water discharge. Under the stand alone operating scenario, the Subsequent EIR noted that impingement and entrainment of the proposed project will be insignificant and for these reasons, no mitigation measures are required to reduce impingement and/or entrainment impacts to marine organisms. The Subsequent EIR concluded that under either the co-located or stand-alone operating condition that the desalination project would not substantially reduce populations of affected species such that the sustainability of the affected species could not be maintained. There are no threatened or endangered species in the desalination project's source water and no areas of special biological significance. (See also findings for Policy C6.1.19.) The desalination project is surrounded by industrial properties, a 145-foot wide flood control channel, Huntington Beach Generating Station, a wetland area to the southeast and vacant property and a mobile home park to the west. The wetland area is separated from the project by Huntington Beach Generating Station's existing unused oil tank and an existing berm and the mobile home park is separated by Newland Street and a vacant parcel. The project has been designed to not create any impacts to the wetlands or residential uses. Nonetheless, a number of mitigation measures will be required to ensure that impacts are minimized. State and Federal agencies with regulatory authority in wetlands and other environmentally sensitive habitats have been consulted as part of the CEQA process for the project. These agencies include, among others, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game, and California Coastal Commission. The project as conditioned will require compliance with the standards set forth in the most recent edition of the Uniform Building Code to assure safety of the occupants and seismic safety to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning and Building prior to issuance of a building permit. Lastly, the project is an ocean water desalination plant that will create an alternative, local drought- proof source of potable water, and therefore reduce on a 1:1 basis the demand by the project's Orange Country public water agency customers for water imported through the State Water Project. When the project is completed, it will provide Orange County with 50 million gallons of potable water per day, accommodating the needs of Orange County regardless of weather or governmentally imposed conditions affecting water supply. By building the facility and locating it in Huntington Beach, the CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 e209_ Attachment No. 1.15 facility will demonstrate the opportunities offered by desalination, and will offer cities, counties, and the State of California a tangible example of how desalination can become more widely accepted throughout the state and the nation, and will encourage additional research and feasibility studies regarding ocean water desalination as an alternative source of potable water. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, O Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The project meets or exceeds all minimum development standards including but not limited to setbacks, height, parking, and lot size/width. The project is required to comply with all Public Works, Fire, and Planning and Building Department codes and requirements. The project conforms to the City's Design Guidelines and incorporates variations in form, building details, colors, and materials that create visual interest. The project provides buffering from sensitive uses such as residential developments through landscaping, a block wall, and increased setbacks. The perimeter wall is designed in a manner to create an attractive appearance and will be consistent with the wall design approved for the portion of the HBGS property to the south for a cohesive appearance. The project meets all the requirements of the O Overlay District. The project meets the minimum size requirements, and the project includes a reuse plan to remediate property that has been contaminated by previous oil-related use. The property is required to operate in compliance with Title 15, Uniform Fire Code, and any other applicable Federal, State, County, or local rules and regulations, and must be approved by the Fire Department. Non-permitted equipment will not be allowed to be used on the project site, and all requirements for the use of an O overlay zone have been or will be met, including dedication requirements. The project meets all the applicable requirements for the CZ overlay district. The project preserves and improves existing visual resources and complies with maximum height limitations, off-street parking requirements, landscaping requirements, and other requirements. Due to the nature of existing utility improvements at the project location, there is currently no public access at the site; therefore,public access will not be affected by the project. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. The proposed project is an infill development, which as conditioned and with the implementation of all mitigation measures will provide all necessary infrastructure to adequately service the site and not impact adjacent development. This includes dedication and improvements to the project frontage along Edison Avenue to improve circulation in the area. The proposed project will comply with City of Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements, including the installation of fire sprinklers and fire hydrants, and impacts of the project on the Fire Department are not expected to be significant. There are no anticipated additional impacts of the project on Police protection. The project is expected to have little or no impact on libraries. The impacts on roadway maintenance caused by the project are expected to be less than significant. The project is anticipated to have a negligible impact on parks and recreation facilities within the City. Project impacts to existing wastewater facilities are expected to be minimal, and the project plans are anticipated to include a new sewer line or private sewer system to accommodate additional wastewater. A local storm water drainage system would be implemented as part of the site facility, CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -210- Attachment No. 1.16 and storm water would be treated on-site prior to off-site discharge, as necessary to meet applicable requirements set by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board or the City. The project would require new facilities to support operational water uses, but these uses are not expected to create significant impacts. There are no significant impacts of the project on reclaimed water use. The project would not create any significant impacts on the disposition of solid waste. The project's power demand would be less than one percent of the demand within Orange County or Southern California, and is anticipated to be less than significant. No impacts on natural gas supply are anticipated in the implementation of the project. No significant impacts on telephone and cable service are anticipated by the project. 4. The development of the desalination project and approximately one mile of water transmission lines within the Coastal Zone conforms to the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act as they will not impede any public access to the coast and public recreation opportunities in the area. All public access to the coast and public recreation in the area will not be impeded during the long-term operation of the facility as well as during the construction process with the implementation of conditions of approval and mitigation measures. The site does not currently provide public access or public recreation opportunities because of the nature of the historic uses at the site. The proposed project is consistent with the Public and Semipublic utility uses for which the site is designated, and is not suited for public access or recreation purposes for a number of reasons, including concerns about public safety. The site is located landward of Pacific Coast Highway and would not provide a connection to the coast or public recreation opportunities, as it is virtually surrounded by industrial, utility or commercial uses. Nonetheless, because no public access or recreational opportunities currently exist on the site, the project will not impede existing public access to the coast or public recreation opportunities in the area. The project will not impact any existing public parking or beach access and will not discourage or impact any existing lower cost visitor and recreational facilities. The project site is currently not accessible to the beach, thus no access will be impacted. The proposed project will not impede any unique water-oriented activities, nor does it involve any oceanfront land suitable for recreational use. The project involves the use of private lands that are not suitable for visitor-serving commercial recreational facilities. Even if the lands were suitable for such visitor-serving uses, the project proposes a coastal-dependent industry use, which is not of a lower priority than visitor-serving uses. The Final SEIR certified for the project on September 7, 2010 serves as adequate and appropriate environmental documentation for approval of CDP 10-014. The unavoidable significant adverse effects of the project as identified in Section 5.0 of the Statement of Facts and Findings (growth inducement outside of Orange County and short-term construction related impacts in regards to air quality)have been lessened in their severity by the application of standard code requirements, conditions, the inclusion of project design features and the imposition of the mitigation measures. The remaining unavoidable significant impacts are clearly outweighed by the economic, social, and other benefits of the project, as set forth in the "Statement of Overriding Considerations"included as CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -21 7® Attachment No. 1.17 Section 7.0 of the Statement of Facts and Findings. The City Council adopts the recitation of overriding considerations which justify approval of the project notwithstanding certain unavoidable significant environmental effects which cannot feasibly be substantially mitigated as set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL —TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 1. The tentative parcel map received and dated August 11, 2010 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. Remove Note G on Newland Street because the dedication and street widening on Newland Street has already occurred and there IS no need for additional dedication. (PW) b. Horizontal control (i.e. bearing and distance) should be added for the hammerhead off of Edison Street. (PW) c. Remove the word "Emergency" from Note J and replace it with the word"Public" so that Note J would state "Proposed Public Access Easement." (PW) SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL —COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 10- 014: 1. The site plans, floor plans, elevations, and landscaping plan received and dated August 12, 2010 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The landscape area on the east side of the project site on Parcel 3 shall include the removal of all Myoporum, and shall be planted with a palette of plants indigenous to the Southern California coastal community. b. Provide a patio along the front entrance of the administration building. (DRB) c. Provide landscape planters around the administration building. (DRB) d. Provide screening for the solids loading area and filter substation compatible with the project. (DRB) e. Provide screening to the top of the chemical storage, carbon dioxide, and flush tanks. (DRB) f. The landscaping plan shall reflect plant materials that are more mature than the minimum code requirements subject to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. (DRB) g. The applicant shall install landscaping on Parcel 2 along Newland and Edison to match the project for a consistent appearance. h. The landscaping and wall plan shall be consistent in design, colors, and materials with the landscaping and wall plan for AES for a cohesive appearance. CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -212- Attachment No. 1.18 i. The landscaping along the Newland and Edison lease area street frontages shall include the densest type and number of trees to provide the most effective screening possible and shall be maintained to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. j. A perimeter block wall shall be constructed along the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility/Poseidon boundary,per Public Works Department requirements. (PW) k.. Buildings of the subject project may not cross property lines. Lot lines shall be adjusted at the proposed treatment facility accordingly. (PW) 1. _Revise 36"-42" City Pipeline Stub to 18"-36" City Pipeline Stub. (PW) m. Tree species planted along Edison Street shall not canopy over the street to avoid blocking large maintenance vehicles accessing the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility. (CS) 2. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the following shall be completed: For the demolition of the three (3)200 foot diameter fuel oil tanks, a work plan must be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to commencement of work. (FD) I Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed: ae The applicant shall submit written proof of final project approval by each applicable regulating agency including but not limited to the California Coastal Commission, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District and all applicable water agencies and cities. u.. The required Precise Grading Plan shall include the following: (PW) 1) Extension of the existing 8-inch diameter City sewer main in Edison Avenue easterly to the terminus of said street. 2) Connection to the existing 8-inch sewer main along the adjacent property's northerly property line (also southerly of the existing Orange County Flood Control District's right-of-way) shall be prohibited. c, Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant will enter into a Franchise agreement approved and executed by the City for the generation and transport of product water from the site, and through and across the city's streets, rights-of-way or properties. (PW) (MC 3.44) d. A separate (new) irrigation water service and meter installed per Water Division Standards, and sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the landscape irrigation demand and the Water Efficient Landscape Requirements (MC 14.52) the minimum size shall be 1". (PW) e. The proposed 30"tank overflow line shall be prohibited from surface discharging directly into the public right-of-way. (PW) CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -213- Attachment No. 1.19 f. Areas for containment shall be provided to mitigate possible spillage of any materials affecting storm water quality that may be stored on-site, and to protect the adjacent wetlands to the maximum extent feasible. (PW) 4. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. A Water Purchase Agreement shall be executed between the applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project and the City of Huntington Beach and shall incorporate the following: (PW) 1) The City will have the option (the "Option") to enter into a water purchase agreement("Water Purchase Agreement") to purchase water from the Project on terms essentially the same as all of the other water purchase agreements for the Project, provided, however that the City's price for up to 3,360 acre-feet per year(3 million gallons per day or 4.6 cubic feet per second) of the water purchased from the Project will be equal to the combination of(1) a 5% discount on the purchase price of water supplied by MWD via the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and(2) any subsidy received by the City from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California or any other third party for the purchase of water from the Project such as, but not limited to, MWDOC; and provided further that the City's price will not exceed the purchase price for Project water in the other water purchase agreements for the Project. 2) The City will have the first right to purchase up to an additional 4,000,000 gallons per day(6.1 CFS) of additional water from the Project during a declared water emergency at the same costs as above for not to exceed seven days in any 30 day period and not to exceed 28,000,000 gallons in any one emergency event.. The definition of a declared water emergency is a 50% or greater loss of overall City water supply (not including droughts) or connected facilities such as distribution system, booster stations, reservoirs, wells and imported connections causing a reduction of at least 50% of the City's water supply. c. The applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project will enter into an Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) approved and executed by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach. (EDD) d. The applicant shall conduct and submit to the Planning and Building Department an additional noise study at the project design stage and include sound level sampling at approximately 3 a.m. The applicant shall attenuate project generated noise with the intent being to avoid a perceptible increase in noise at the nearest residential property, but allowing up to a 5 dBA increase above the nighttime ambient noise levels at the nearest residential property line based on noise levels determined in the design level noise study. 5. The structures cannot be occupied, the final building permits cannot be approved, utilities cannot be released, the use cannot commence, and the Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued until the CDP 10-014/TPM I 0-130 September 20,201 0 -214- Attachment No. 1.20 following has been completed: The applicant shall demonstrate that all measures required by these conditions to protect the nearby wetlands have been implemented. 6. During demolition, remediation, grading, site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Construction equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. b. Use low sulfur(0.5%) diesel fuel by weight in all diesel equipment. c. Shut off engines when not in use. d. Attempt to phase and schedule activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts. e. Discontinue operation during second stage smog alerts. f. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. g. Discovery of additional contamination/pipelines, etc. must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly. (FD) 7. The applicant shall completely remove the storage tanks from the site within 12 months from the date of approval of City building permits and agreements. 8. No parking shall be permitted on the south side of Edison Ave. (PW) 9. With the development of the proposed Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Facility, the applicant/operator of the project will deliver potable water to the City from a location within the project site, specifically the proposed Tank Storage site. The applicant/operator of the project shall provide a water pipeline from the tank storage site, a bypass water pipeline and located within the booster pump station, two pump cans including base plates, baffles, steal discharge heads, and suction manifolds per City requirements and specification. (PW) 10. The applicant shall keep the facility under video surveillance 24 hours per day every day. Videos should be saved for at least 30 days to provide Police with the recording.(PD) 11. Post clear signage describing the acceptable behavior allowed and uses of the facility. Signs should also make it clear that there is 24/7 video surveillance.(PD) 1.2. The administration building should be clearly marked to help visitors.(PD) 13. The entire facility should be lighted throughout all hours of darkness, but must conform to the lighting requirements of Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001.(PD) CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -215- Attachment No. 1.21 14. The project shall comply with the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001. 15. The Planning and Building Department Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning and Building Department Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning and Building Department Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the City Council may be required pursuant to the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. 16. The applicant and applicant's representatives shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for review and approval. 17. The applicant/property owner and each successor in interest to the property which is the subject of this project shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the City, City Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 18. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Energy Minimization and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan attached as Appendix W to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report. 19. Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 and Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 shall become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of final approval by the City Council, or within two years of the date of final Coastal Development Permit approval by the Coastal Commission if the Coastal Development Permit is appealed, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning and Building Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. CDP 10-014/TPM 10-130 September 20,2010 -216- Attachment No. 1.22 ATTACHMENT #2 Council/Agency Meeting Held:_ Deferred/Continued to: ❑Approved ❑Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied City Clerk's Signature Council Meeting Date: September 7, 2010 Department ID Dumber: PL10-020 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Administrator PREPARED BY: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Building SUBJECT: Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment(EPA) No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-130 to amend Condiitonal Use Permit(CUP) No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 02-05 by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration are Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-130 which pertain to the Seawater Desalination Project. EPA No. 10-001 is a request by Poseidon Resources Corporation to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 approved by City Council in 2006 by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans,and building elevations for the project. TPM No. 10-130 is an accompanying request to subdivide three parcels totaling ± 19.5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project. Staff is recommending approval of the project with modifications. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Recommended Action: Motion to: A) Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 to permit the Seawater Desalination Project with staff recommended findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No. 1); and, B) Approve CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts with a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attachment No. 2). -218- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): a) "Deny Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 with findings for denial." b) "Continue Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 and direct staff accordingly." Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Poseidon Resources Corporation, 17011 Beach Blvd., Suite 900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 _Property Owners: AES HB, LLC, 21730 Newland St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646; City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main St., Huntington Beach, CA 92648; Various for off site improvements. Location: 21730 Newland (east side of Newland, south of Edison Ave.) and pipeline routes (Primary Route -along Newland, Hamilton, Brookhurst, and Adams and Alternative Routes—further north along Newland, Brookhurst, and Warner) Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 represents a request pursuant to Section 241.18 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 approved by City Council in.2006 that allowed the construction and operation of a seawater desalination project by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project. Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 represents a request pursuant to Chapter 251 of the HBZSO to subdivide three parcels totaling ± 19.5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project. In comparison to the previously approved plans, the revised plans now reflect: ■ The project being sited north of the previously approved location by incorporating the adjacent city tank site in addition to AES property to create an±8.6 acre parcel; ® The proposed 30 foot tall water storage tank is still in the same location as previously approved on the corner of Newland and Edison on a +3.5 acre parcel; • The project's architectural design has changed slightly but is comparable to the previous approval and incorporates the same colors, though an exterior finish system (i.e. stucco appearance) has been eliminated; and ■ Revised height and size (still in compliance with the HBZSO) for some structures as noted in the following matrix listing all proposed structures including a comparison to the previously approved project: -219- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 2005 2010 Architecture Architecture Ht. Ht. Area ft Area(SF) ft (SF) BUILDINGS SOLIDS HANDLING AND BUILDING 21' 7,590 25' 1,760 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING is, 10,120 20' 5,000 R.O.BUILDING 25' 38,090 35' 34,727 ELECTRICAL BUILDING 12' 900 35' 4.840 SUBTOTAL BUILDINGS 56,700 46,327 TANKS AND STRUCTURES OUTDOOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 12' 900 12' 23,541 • Substation Switch Gear (19,600) •• Transformers (960) ((960) • Product Water Pump Station (,176 Electrical 805) PRETREATMENT FILTER STRUCTURE 16' 38,270 28' 59,550 CHEMICAL STORAGE TANKS& 23' 4,368 24' 2,100 CARBON DIOXIDE TANKS 8' 1,482 FLUSH/WASH TANK 19, 1,590 23' 605 RINSE TANK 29' 491 -- PRODUCT WATER STORAGE TANK 30' 36,305 30' 49,481 AMMONIA/FLOURIDE STORAGE TANK 6' 28 12' 558 LIME SILOS 26' 4,560 -- -- INFLUENT PUMP STATION -- 1,880 20' 2,184 POST-TREATMENT TANKS -- -- 27' 5,250 PRODUCT WATER PUMP STATION -- 650 20' 4,176 SURGE TANK -- 312 14' 408 SUBTOTAL TANKS AND STRUCTURES _J_ 90,836 147,853 TOTAL BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES 147,536 194,180 The project still includes up to 10 miles of water transmission lines to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa. Two off-site underground booster pump stations and modifications to an existing booster pump station would be needed as part of this primary water transmission route. As part of the revised project the proposal now includes pipeline design variations and optional routes and pump stations that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options. The desalination project proposes to now either take screened seawater from the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) discharge pipeline or pump seawater as a stand alone facility using the HBGS intake pipeline, if the HBGS stops using once-through cooling, and purify it using reverse osmosis to produce drinking water. The project still proposes to use up to 100 MGD of seawater to produce 50 MGD of drinking water for use in Orange County. -220- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/712010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 The remaining 50 MGD of concentrated seawater will be blended with the remainder of the HBGS cooling water or with 52 MGD of dilution seawater in the stand alone condition and discharged via the existing HBGS outfall pipe extending approximately 1,500 feet offshore. Pipelines will still be constructed on the existing HBGS site to connect the proposed desalination project to the existing HBGS ocean intake and discharge pipeline. No changes are proposed to the coastal/marine portion of the existing HBGS intake and outfall. As with the previously approved plans, an underground water transmission line will be constructed from the desalination project to the closest regional distribution line located in Costa Mesa. The segment located within Huntington Beach will be approximately four miles long, one mile of which will be within the Coastal Zone boundary, and will be located entirely within the existing public right-of-way along Newland Street, Hamilton Avenue and potentially Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue. The property where the various buildings, tanks, and other structures are proposed is presently developed with three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and a concrete containment berm. All three tanks as well as the interior portions of the 10 to 12 foot high concrete berm are proposed to be demolished to allow for the proposed structures. The site will be remediated to address any contamination from the previous use. The facilities will operate 24 hours, seven days a week and will have a total staff of 12 to 18 with shift size varying. The applicant has indicated that the request is necessary to provide a new water supply source into the area that is reliable and drought proof. The project's potential environmental impacts are analyzed and discussed in a separate staff report. Prior to any action on EPA No. 10-001 and TPM No. 10-130, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001. B. BACKGROUND In September 2005 the City Council certified Recirculated Environmental Impact Report No. 00-02 and in February 2006 approved Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04/Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 for the construction and operation of the seawater desalination project. The Coastal Development Permit is currently on appeal at the Coastal Commission. C. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: This analysis reviews the following aspects of the project: land use compatibility, site layout, circulation, street dedication/improvement, water transmission line, other project impacts, aesthetics, and benefits/disadvantages to the city. Land Use Compatibility Even with the proposed amendments the proposed use is still compatible and consistent with the properties immediately surrounding the subject site. To the north are various industrial uses extending to Hamilton Avenue, which provide a buffer to the residential area north of Hamilton located±800 feet from the project. To the east are a 145-foot wide flood control -221- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 channel and then the ASCON-NEST landfill and Magnolia tank farm. Further east are single- family residences across Magnolia Street located+1,300 feet from the project. The closest residential uses are +200 feet away and include the manufactured homes and RV Park across Newland to the west behind a vacant parcel. The wetlands to the southeast are separated by an existing concrete berm and a distance of+500 feet to the closest proposed desalination project structure. To the south of the project is the remainder of the HBGS which is compatible with the project. Site Layout The amended layout of the plant will not be detrimental to the area because it is still buffered by substantial distance (from+200 to±1,300 feet) from residential and other sensitive uses. The 30-foot high water reservoir tank, which will be the most visible of the structures proposed near the street frontages, is setback +180 feet from the property line along Newland and +80 feet from the property line along Edison Avenue. The rest of the proposed structures are located towards the east end of the property away from Newland and are setback+100 feet from the east property line. Furthermore, facility operations under the amended plan will continue to be directed towards the interior of the site and will be screened from view by the existing perimeter concrete berm and the proposed landscaping and eight foot high wall_ The proposed project and tentative parcel map comply with the requirements of the PS-O-CZ (Public-Semipublic-Oil Production Overlay—Coastal Zone Overlay) zoning district(Attachment No. 3). Circulation, Street Dedication and Improvement Site access with the revised plan remains through the existing HBGS gated driveway off Newland. A minimum 24-foot wide access easement across the HBGS property and leading to the proposed structures and parcels is shown on the site plan. Parking areas next to the administration building and along the east side of the project provide 31 parking spaces and will be adequate to accommodate staff members and guests. The parking layout has proper circulation and the proposed parking spaces and drive aisle widths meet code. The loading area is separated from the main access aisle and the parking lot and is of adequate size to accommodate all truck operations. To improve circulation in the area the applicant will still be required to dedicate and improve 12 feet of property along the project frontage on Edison Avenue for street widening. Off-site Water Transmission Lines The project continues to include the construction of a water transmission line from the desalination project to the closest regional distribution line located in Costa Mesa. The segment located within Huntington Beach will be approximately four miles long and will be located entirely within the existing public right-of-way along Newland Street, Hamilton Avenue and potentially Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue. As part of the revised project the proposal now includes pipeline design variations and optional routes and pump stations that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options. To minimize any detrimental impacts to the community and to maintain access to the coast and public recreation areas during construction as required by the Coastal Act, the Public Works Department will require the applicant to prepare traffic control plans to mitigate -222- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER; PL10-020 impacts to city streets and facilitate circulation during construction. A franchise agreement will also be required for use of the city's right-of-way. Other Project Components The SEIR notes that the stationary noise sources from the project include various water pumps and air conditioning system components. However, the majority of these noise sources is located indoors or is provided with enclosures to dampen noise. Additionally, intervening structures such as the concrete berm and proposed wall combined with significant setbacks will further reduce noise impacts. A mitigation measure has also been identified which requires the applicant to monitor noise levels of stationary noise sources and retain an acoustical engineer to install additional noise attenuation measures to comply with the city's noise ordinance. The desalination plant will be using chemicals in its operations both to clean the reverse osmosis membranes and to treat the potable product water. The project will incorporate leak and containment measures to minimize any risk to employees and the surroundings. All chemicals will be stored_ in concrete containment structures with a 110 percent spill containment capacity. The transportation of chemicals to the desalination plant will be conducted by registered haulers and is required to comply with all Caltrans regulations. The plant is also required to develop hazardous waste management and safety plans pursuant to Occupational Health and Safety Association (OSHA)and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements. The Fire Department will also require the applicant to submit for their approval a complete chemical inventory and a use, storage, and handling plan prepared by a qualified professional. The applicant has demonstrated that the project will not create any noticeable odors. The applicant is required to obtain a permit to operate from the Air Quality Management District and will continue to be regulated by the agency to address this issue. Aesthetics The project will improve the appearance of the area by demolishing three existing 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and replacing them with lower profile, modem, and more attractive structures. The amended proposed structures vary in height with the maximum height being 35 feet which still complies with the HBZSO. The amended.structures are at minimum 5 feet lower than the existing 40-foot high tanks. Furthermore, the bottom portion of these structures will be hidden behind the existing concrete berm along the perimeter. As noted before, the proposed structures are in substantial compliance with the Design Guidelines by employing variations in form, building details, colors, and materials that create visual interest. The design is carried through all the structures including the architectural screen for the tanks to achieve a unified theme. The perimeter wall is designed in a manner to create an attractive appearance and will be consistent with the wall design approved for the portion of the HBGS property to the south for a cohesive appearance. The installation of a 10 foot and 20 foot deep planter along the project street frontage on Edison and Newland respectively will further improve the appearance of the project. The amended design, colors, and materials of the project have -223- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 been reviewed and are recommended for approval by the Design Review Board with minor modifications as reflected in the recommended conditions of approval. Benefits and Disadvantages To The City The following (not listed necessarily in order of importance)would be potential benefits to City from the proposed project, with generally-estimated values provided: 1. Additional ocean water quality testing required since water will be a source of the public drinking water supply [value = intrinsic]. 2. Improved appearance and remediation of the immediate site by replacement of oil storage tanks and containment berms with an architecturally-enhanced and landscaped facility [value = intrinsic] 3. Water supply benefits from connecting Poseidon's pipeline to the City's water system downstream of the City's MWD meter may allow the City to avoid MWD surcharges. [value = $300,000/year based on $55/acre-foot surcharges and 15 acre-feet/day] 4. Emergency source of dependable, alternative ("drought-proof') potable water supply [value = intrinsic] 5. Diversification of City's water supply portfolio through Poseidon's connection to City's system, making product water potentially available when MWD sources are rationed or curtailed under severe drought or other service discontinuances [value= $3,000/day of curtailment based on $205/acre-foot Basin Equity Assessment and 15 acre-feet/day] 6. If a joint-use reservoir were to be negotiated: a. Water storage at the City's master planned 10 million gallon capacity to serve primarily the southeast area of the City [value = intrinsic] b. Reduced size of, or elimination of, reservoir booster pump station due to Poseidon's high-pressure discharge to the City's (jointly-owned with Mesa Consolidated Water District) MWD pipeline (OC-44) [value = $4 million avoided construction costs + $15,000/year O&M savings + $25,000/year energy savings] c. Reduced construction cost of master planned water storage reservoir by potentially transferring some or all construction costs to developer [value = $1 million per million gallons of capacity] 7. Franchise payments for company's use of City's street rights-of-way for company's pipeline and connection to City's (jointly-owned with Mesa Consolidated Water District) MWD pipeline (OC-44) [value = to be negotiated] -224- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/712010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 8. New Cif tax revenues without significant new demands on City services [value = $50,000/year utility tax revenue to City + $1,200,000/year revenue to RDA + $62,500/year property tax revenue to City+ $400,000/year housing set aside to RDA] (based on $200,000,000 construction cost estimate) The project has the following disadvantage to the city: a It will cause a temporary disruption to city streets during the construction process. The analysis of the project indicates that the proposed advantages to the city outweigh the disadvantages because the project will result in much needed improvements to the aesthetics of the area. Additionally, the proposed use conforms to the General Plan.Land Use and zoning designations on the subject site which permits utilities like the desalination plant. D. SUMMARY --- Staff recommends that the City Council approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 02=04 and Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 subject to conditions based on the following: ® The proposed amendment is compatible with surrounding uses and is buffered from residential and other sensitive uses by significant setbacks, perimeter landscaping, and fencing. ® The project will improve the appearance of the area by demolishing three existing unused 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and replacing them with lower profile, modern, and more attractive structures. • The proposed structures are in substantial compliance with the Design Guidelines by employing varied building form, architectural details, and colors that create visual interest. The design is carried through all the structures including the architectural screen for the tanks to achieve a unified theme. This coupled with the 10 foot(Edison) to 20 foot (Newland) perimeter landscape planter and screen wall will enhance the overall appearance of the site compared to the existing condition. a The project will advance the remediation of any contamination around the unused fuel storage tanks. ® All other impacts pertaining to noise, light/glare, odors, and use of chemicals are addressed to avoid detrimental impacts to the area. ® The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of P (Public) for the site. ® The project is consistent with General Plan and Coastal Element goals, objectives, and policies. ® The project conforms to the requirements of the Coastal Zone Overlay and will not impede access to the coast or any public recreation opportunities in the area. The proposed parcels comply with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. -225- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 Environmental Status: The project's potential environmental impacts are analyzed and discussed in a separate staff report. Prior to any action on EPA No. 10-001 and TPM No. 10-130, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) No. 10- 001. Staff recommends that SEIR No. 10-001 be certified as adequate and complete with mitigation measures, Findings and Facts, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Although the project results in an adverse impact to the environment in relation to short-term construction related emissions and growth inducement outside of Orange County that cannot be fully mitigated or avoided, the City Council may still approve the project if a Statement of Overriding Considerations is adopted. CEQA requires decision makers to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the City may consider the adverse environmental effects acceptable. In this particular case, staff believes the social, economic, and ecosystem/biological resources benefits-of the proposed project outweigh the adverse impacts to air quality during the construction process as well as possible growth inducement outside of Orange County. The project benefits are outlined in the Statement of Overriding Considerations (see Attachment No. 2). As a point of reference, the unavoidable significant impact in regards to short-term construction related emissions is also found in the Environmental Impact Report for other city approved projects such as the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan, The Strand (Blocks 104/105), Home Depot, and Walmart. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is the formal documentation required by CEQA to implement and monitor compliance with all mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program establishes which City departments are responsible for ensuring completion and compliance with all adopted mitigation measures. Following approval of the EPA and TPM, the City Council must approve CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts with a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attachment No. 2). Strategic Plan Goal: Maintain financial viability and our reserves -226- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL. ACTION MEETING DATE: 917/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PLIO-020 AttachM@ntU: o 'De ptl.oh , 1. Findings and Conditions of Approval 2. CEQA Statement of Findings and-.Facts with Statement of Overriding Considerations — SEIR No. 10-001 3. Zoning Compliance Matrix 4. Site plans, floor plans, elevations, landscaping plan, and pipeline alignment dated August 12, 2010 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 dated August 11, 2010 5. Project Narrative dated August 11, 2010 6. Code Requirements List for informational purposes only. 7. PowerPoint Presentation -227- ATTAC H M E N T #3 Zoning Comi2liance: The seawater desalination project is located in the PS-0-CZ (Public-Semipublic— Oil Production Overlay— Coastal Zone Overlay) zoning district and complies with the requirements of that zone. The following is an updated zoning conformance matrix which compares the proposed project with the development standards of PS zoning district: ° ISSUE CODERR,OVIISION' " ��� >�� ":P D; a. . SECTI611f A,. 214.08 Lot Area Min. 2 acres Min. 3 acres Lot Width Min. 100 ft. Over 100 ft. - Setbacks Front Min. 10 ft. Parcel 1 - Min. 80 ft. (from Newland) Parcel 3— Min. 80 ft. (front north lot line) Parcels 2 and 4— existing complies. Side Min. 0 All four parcels comp) Street Side Min. 10 ft. Min. 80 ft. Parcel 1 Rear Min. 0 All four parcels comp) Building Height Max. 50 ft. Max. 35 ft. (from finished floor) Floor Area Ratio Zoning Max. 1.5 All four parcels comply General Plan None NA Site Landscaping Parcel 1 — Min. 6% (9,105 s.f.) Complies Parcel 3— Min. 8% (30,122 s.f.) Parcels 2 and 4— No less than existing parent parcel. Building Design Requires building offset along Project design recommended front and street side; Alternative for approval by the Design standards may be allowed for Review Board. unique structures subject to Design Review. 231.04.B Off-Street Parking - No min. — Based upon project 31 spaces (adequate for Number employees andguests) Other Min. 9 ft. by 19 ft. with 26 ft. Complies aisle Loading Area Three loading areas min. 20 ft. Complies by 14 ft. 230.78 Refuse Storage Required Complies 230.84 Dedication & Dedicate 12 ft. along Edison Complies Improvements Ave. frontage 230.88 Fences &Walls Screen wall required 8 ft. high wall with accent pilasters consistent with. .approved HBGS wall plan -229- ATTAC H M E N T #4 IGJJ �HJ�iviciv i — V1'J HF)Lc N I40. 0' ~-m- 148.93' �--� R=65.00' o I L=65.90' Z I \ EA SEMEN TS � NI N 2 EASEMENT RESERVED BY S.C.E. PER INST 20010286988, O.R. GI ( ® I N897 9 EASEMENT RESERVED BY S.C.E. PER INST. 20010286988, O.R. �J DISTRIBUTION, AND TELECOMMUNICATION UTILITY CORRIDOR 2 'I20'2 S.C.E. PER INST. 20010286988, O.R. 333.23' N89 29'32"W 373.23' a )-ION, DISTRIBUTION, AND TELECOMMUNICATION UTILITY EASEMENT S.C.E. PER 1 NST 20010286988, O.R, FUTURE OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION AND ATION EASEMENT RESERVED BY S.C.E. PER INST 20010286988, °I MENT RESERVED BY S.C.E. PER INST. 20010286988, O.R. T OF WAY DEDICATION PER iNST. 79970652309, O.R. i OL EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD / RICT PER BOOK 5190, PAGE 102, O.R. , FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR THE PURPOSE OF ,HARGE OF SEAWATER FOR COOLING PURPOSES PER DOCUMENT 9, RECORDED IN BOOK 3795, PAGE 535, O.R. I A Q o � o Q Y Q cr_ m m ATLANTIC AVE. VICTORIA ST I NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE _ _ sr Af' _ ' g A (BUILDING 55' X 32 ) s e t' S / ! (LOADING AREA`42' X 16') ® o ADMINISTRATION BUILDING (100'x54') �C4 S� ROAD i 6 72";BRINE E / STORM P RAIN „l / A i DUCT WATER PUMP STATION 7RICAL EQ(JIPMENT (28'x35') ff'f \� � I > � INFLUENT PUMP \ !,Q1 STATION (28'x78') . " 9 74 78 85 _ ._.. 92 -A 50 60 70 80 90 100 SECTION GRADING PROFILE EDISON AVENUE A VERT 1 "=5', HORIZ 1 "=5' - ........ _ ......... _ ......1111................_ .. ... _ __ . . ____ ....... .....__ .. ........... __.... 12' ....... - ............ _EXIST...._ASPHALT._.P__TN . .... _ ____ ..............__ - ............._....................._._ _...... ..... ................. _..__ ..... . ........ . 22: .... __ .. ......- .............. 2 J�� ............... _____ ...... ....................... .......... . .........- .. .............. - - - .. .......... LANDSCAPING .. _._ WALL (8'-0") ...... ........ _-_ EXIST. CHAIN LINK FENCE . .... -- _ _ . ... _ ...... .............. r / IN- , IV >y/( / , , , J'26 n , w „ ..... O ID HANDLING L17ES /'�� ADMINISTRATION BUILDING --8 B \ \ , 30 30 , . 'LESS R AD . tiEAR i �° w RIB WATER PUMP STATION 72" BR 0INE ST 11Ai DRAIN r I/ !//. /// Mll I I / i .ECTRICAL �IPMENT . INFLUENT -11 \-. \ h � i I , I r , r , , %- f, t � r ' w �a, ! f ` ............. M 3 33, y 7 'K PRET ...TMENVo - n: 1 - .t , I 9" � I ,.,,,,: .. - E Al IDER PLANTED LANDSCAPE AREA—""' REA SROUND COVER. IN FRONT OF OFFICE: 330 SF. ` , ikND STREET AND SEE ENLARGED PLAN \ r ANTI NG AREAS . _..,, z - :, « , i ...._ .. yr q ,Y WALL r, yy , € I CONCRETE BERM SECTION A-A EDISON AVENUE SCALE: 1 " = 10' y (✓ � \��`� :3�� `�.,� ..,-",,�` �`" ,�� { ! ice' i� �"; ui J r k e. I - - �: 2 F r� 77 ®r',, 07% <f L yY a-. ( S L'JL - bk' '•E yrl' i;f °� ;�:, a-/ 1, / a•,: °"� :'.« .<. ..!v ,, o� r ':.; y -- .,%r.- t., �,/x ti, •'y`% ,%,,"�;w i/ 'b,�a,' x"f u. �,..� ,:,; ., u:`>„ ,� ..„s. •- '3� '.;'• ,.,,.. � -;: � .....:, R ,'r,E vat R x y vk R < a» x 4 / a!f,. <n llf rY 3 Ate, a r Vie.' 'xV > A �va�ate" ✓n 'fi""Yrk Q '� r",S ka'm, a; e r s ra. '?re' ,+..,,;, v All 11 SAVA 8. TV WA 1 All N y b IN WITS Y �•,' � � is e� i�' A Faax`,�� , ,�' ��,.. -� SY';' '�` c�"a .•rny �a - �� ': �3,rda -'h �� -k'M i��xrr' � ,- i yk "aid,�'�,?., ,z•'" a; �, - -'it win � a 36i-3n 4 a gIMF,,y a x T,OFINIAL urth e[evation .x ,�1 PV�d"1�ti+74t 1 L <j l rt c a�. Y j r .0 s '• s? 077 (57E x d I I I I ! I I I � . �-1 , -w-l" I , des.... , V`�'-�Jp­',�lft- I -, �, , I , "' � "M. -"I ' ,I --"r-1111 17 --V �,w - �,�z A , 11,11;-11.1' 11, - - --�m,%'k- , -- 01'1�1;,�Z;,", , - , I - I T, �l , I , , - , �,,k-' I �'IOW,,,,�4 � - , � , , 11 - - � � i� �'lI 't`� ;,O,,,�, �,,,,ft ", , I ��,'.,-Il , "-', 1� 1,I --, ,X,,1. , , - 11161 -- --�I,�-,�- ... I ! , "' , , ,- ,1,1o� , , ,.", ,' ,' "I" , "n �"Aii,I "ll", Ift Z".� �'. I" 't -,� , , -,"."'I " "�,� �, -, , �, , , ,, x,�v,,I, wn ,` ,I , I�l ,,� op", ,� � , ," , , , � 12"I"!&� I ,� -', I 11 1:7 ;,�� mow.. A� � ,, , � `rimvk, , I , �,,��R,,�',',,!�l,-,,,_ �3,, """, ,��� , -,--l' 'W" "..... I ik',�,le �, "- ��*�'-'! " K-, I ,,,, ", 1, , � � , I 1� - , , '""' WME, - � ,! - i 1 A , "I I ,, I - - � a t , , , , A , I , , -_ 111 - 11 wil," "' . , _ �; � " ". ,� 11 �:�ii, �.,2;, :I� I [ "�' -§�-, I - , -- . I- [, ""L, "ll ,I I -- I , I I ,,�', I -��...... -, - - - , , --- - - -, "",i"'� I �, I - ,,, I I - - � , I l," I'll ill I, g-, L I , ,,�� ,, , , ", I I - , , , , , "I � , :I I , `� - - ; '-,-,I - - " 11 ,1111 I 1-11,- - I I I �, , -z -- ll!,,�11,1, I 11 �1, - - lllg'-�,111- ,� 'I ," ", k "' '", , , ', , " , ,,,-�*'-, , - " I r ,. - " , - I I "t -b" I . ,��,-�.-- � .. ...... , I Z�1'1 I ,L�_,� , -, , , -�l - 'I �-, - - "I'll, , - � ,sqm.� "" ,- -- ,", -� , � , ,4, , , , �� -tz , ,�' , ,, p" ,v �, � I , � - , -i , - al, I - j� 1116" , , -4- � �1%1 -A - -Id i ,, " I , � Ap 1�'l -W, -j-', -41 , �,,,j : , 'I I , ,, , ll f I . '- I 'll " :-,a �", I 11 , ,_ 1W ., ;, - -1.I �,-'- -"� -� "" i '. "Ill ", - " , -"I'' -111�'ll I I , - I , ` P,f�,,-,,,," F , `�,,�,,-'.-,-i ,-" --" I �, , ,�,- �x- , , - ",- , � , , " , ", , -�W" "W." -,, "' - - -,,"',ov , ,�11",N, I-- I li "I , , , , ,,, , ,, - I '�' " , 1 � L I , - n- - ,� "� I I 11 , I I �� I I " ""I'll ,� - "N , "­� : ��, I I W- - , � - I I F. �11 M I * I I -- I , , � 1 - , I I , , , -, - I ,,,� " llll�� I ......�... ... 1�" � 1, 1, I - , ,� , , ,� � � �, , - -- , , I � ��--, , ,�--- , ,�--�,,-�,-, ,,,,, --il, L�' a - I 1-�1`31,A"",12�, ""ll""",-, si",, '�,,,,,,,1541" - ,% "W - �� , # lk .:� I � , �cl 11�1111 I �,� VE., $ I , w �, W I .:� ,"'' , ` I �I ''Ill" I , Z­ , ," , " � ", ,� ", , ,1. , �,,,, -� - , "' - " � "If", I-l� I I , -, , I'll, , 1, " --i I , I , , , "" , . I". -�, � 1% I I ,� I ,,,, - ,� "I �, 3,,,,, , �""�',,,`,-"", �,'�ll � I �� I 'IN " , I 14,11 ke, "', ,- � � ",',�� ," � I -" I � , , , ", , - , - , �, ; - i "-I , " $1 "I,1�11.1 - I -1 I ,­%ll , I �-" 11" -� i,�.- -�',-A I , , I � I " �� -��,` � '� , I ,, ,, ,, ,, , I - , �1' , " I, .11 , I I V - , I 1- """', �, 01, - #4 ,- " � , '.. , S�,, � "- - 0 1,'i"',[`-y I .1 I - 11 ,-, ,'I , -,'�i I , 11 , r . - -: zl;�,W� [;l 0 1 � 1. - ,I I . � , , I'll I I I, I,,, �iv,,'qlllll, � ,, � -t,f , , ��"*,Z",�,-,,,,,,,:,!�-4,��,,,,� I I " I " I , , ",:;,I� "*­1 , "'' ,,,,,, -- , I I � -- - 5! i""i", , , , _V.W11 I,,,,�,-,- ��w I I ...9 � 1 I k�,,-;*-, 'w,',-. , I -',�:�,-'e-,x'I'�;"Im, 7, ., "I . , � - -- , ,­ I - ,I, I , , ',I�', ", '-", P, 1,- -- , " ,- - I ,� , ✓ - ,I'l '� ", - 0 , ,W, I , , � - - *4- , , I ,"I-I I � , "" :' ,", ­lk I ,,,, ,W,�,,,,-,W,,,,,-*- "M 1 - , I t ,", " ,,,,-- ", , , - , , ,� "" , ,io4,%,,,l,,-z'-,-A-ll:��sm , I I , I �� , -,", , . � ��,i,-L-,',-,--, -1. � t""I- - ,,- , ,"' ', & ," 4�-1-11�11 , ,- --" , . , �?, -, "I � M , ,� I , " , --' ,`- -- `� 1% - I I I I, ,,,-,,,!, - ,�;, ;,'' ...4", , � ""' - , ,, I I , , , I , I " , z, "ll Mll fl, , , � - �-I�-"�",," ', 1, , �,,,, - - , -� I 11 - - - '- 1, I., , I'll, " � , - 11 I 1111111P.11 e , I , ���. :, W�, , "', , ",� 11 - , 'I- �,*,*"",���l I I I I ,,- , ,,--I �'I'l-l",11 -"'ll 1, , I"A" f """ I lw- �,'I% , " , I I "N , , , �_ , ,*1 , I , , �, I ,Z......�-� '�,,��I I I , -, � � 11, " i "I ","" -1 I , "" , - 1, I , &�,�, 1 ll�',",�, � , , , , ,�,�, "V',", I I ., - - �,,','��,"',, ,_ ", :%�,,'-;"'��,,,� ,"� , , I I � 11"T I 111-1,1'V, I "�, � li,�, ", ,,, , , �. I ,�,'," , �,� li� �I �i, � , I, , M "I x , , 'I,�l , -"' " , '�' ", , � ,, I ,- 1 . , � - I I rl,,, ,� " " V , ,- , - ", - ,, - ,,, , ," ,� ,, ,�' , ,� -� , , ��- "" , " � '-- --- I I ^I - � ��,,'-I , 4 - , - ''i, M, " 1� , - I 'A , - �,-,� ", 1 lt� 11 1�1,� - " ,44,, - p �...... I " I ,,;,�, � 1,3 , N ill , �, , i , ,,�I 11 -, ,- I; � �, , , , ,,,*� -,�, "'ol I 11 ,I", ,� "I I'll�l ,� �, - -1 , P�jr,��,�,�� I, - - ... ... ,,,, i,*'woii, 11 11�111111 I 11-111� ­�', , � , -I L11 I I " I �,', , ,� I I I � ,llll -111, U, ,x - " �"�',, � , I 1 51 1 . -1 �. - � .',� , ,� rw- ,��,,�-, , ,,,,, k I 1, � " I - " - ad ,�,",,,",",", "N" , I " , - . , ., - , ,,� ,%,,, I ,� ,",� " ,,:-"-- 1� , I I �', ,,, , , , I I ,I ......��,��,_�', , ,�� -��,,, -,;;�,�'m -� ,-�,, """,-, - � , , I - Fl- � , -- � �:, ," I , , -�',js I......��,,,,:�#qiw - , j '? � - �......�� , , & ,,, " , , - ,g�i,INC` 1 --- I �, �r ' ' , 312`I k, �� � b, A- - �,�' I � ,� , , -, � - -- I IN-� , "7 , ,� 11 �'� � I , ", *�I - '�, ,�,��,,,I, , ,�',,,�ll'�,,,,,�,��,��,,,,,,�,, --� ,; R- .�"� ":�,�­,,,, , 1:1 - -i ,�,,-, �� - - ', � . , ,�- . ""-�� 1� �6 , � �14,� ,,, ��",r',.... .. ,�� . ,�� - ,, , - I." � , ... ," --,I,� I's"',I- -'111 � ,�,,',,',',,�,��,��,,,,,�,�,� ,.,�,����,�� :��- , I I , , I I , I , , '' ,--,--a�, �, ,I"'[ I - " � I ,­ I.. I 1 40�"Y,� , k A-1111W I I ," . �, ,- ,, , ,W, I 1�1 11 - I III ,,,�j - �,�, ,,'4�'-- -111111111 i I --, -,- , •,"' ,;(,,� I ,I,�-,, -,��,-, W',Uw --�,,I! " .,-,--,"I ,� �" .." " IM� 'If ,--��!,��'- j;, ' --_, ,--ok ,-I ,,,, -I--, , � , � * ,, ,� , ... """,�';- ,!,,*• ". , , . - - - , , , , , , � �� " ,�,,, I , , , , , .�, Ws ....... Ill" .1 - �-,--�, , " "g," 1,� ,,, - , I - � I ...* I - ,,�,�. , I, ��I:l li � ", ", � '4,", ; ,� I�, I ,;,�,s,�', ,, , , "lil"'I'l �;,�ll . ,;,�- I , �, 417 ; 1, , "I -1 r , ,, ",-� , " �', I%.: , - " � I, � �,, I ` I ," I I ll-�, ,, ,,�_ " � - ,,, ,, , , ,,:,I -,I, I� 1, I"� ... I� - ­- ��' -4,111-1 '11, ,�,"'- !-�,"" , , , - ,,lwik�,"""',k � 11� I I I��l I , , �, I I LL ,, W, "',f�" ," , ",",-��:'�,-' 11 � ,z � :::::: I I lloi&� .�r I .11 I , , " , I , � ,,�,"� -IT I , -- --- � � 4- -1'�: � Ili I, ,-,� -,,,� zl�� I- , �1,:,� *1�1116 I ,, I '�,�� �' , ,-*", � I -?" - �-,,--11 I :," � ,, , I - - I : , �ff 'I, , il I , li"�- ,"', T', 1� I :: -- " , -,"f;11111, I I'll , 11.11.11,11, , , I• ., , 1, - " IN'""', ` r -t, � . r I ,� lll�'`��',,I "%,�'j��'_�,; - r , :'�� ,"",', ", I I I-1�1��111-,I ," 2 ,,'r � j r I ,,, ,, �'. , " " ,r 'r, , , , r_ ,_ ,I r � , ��......I,'r�� ,, , , � �, " Z . , �Q I VI,�I I ,'j,.'- "� �1� ,, , --,-- - - � 1,��, -,",r,��,,�- ;"', ---,, ,, ,-�, i, -- I I"' ,, �� ,.,, , . .,.�,,"I;I I I I I I I�' ,,,�,', - I �11 I I , , --,-�, , --,,,, --,� e- , , 11 lz,I 1 " ,""'.t-- ',", x"',�,,,,,�,� , ,"",, ,e,A , ,, I ,,�,�r,� r r "', I , , I&_. � ... r I _ " 11 "117 M�I -1 I , r, - , � I I,'fin` . �,�..�� ( -,,,, ,'1�, " ,-��W,-�,rr�, ' - E" , , , ,"",, '� " , I P-11,"[:" ,�& " i"." ,� I ,I I - , I �_ _ & - ' , r I -,, ,.rr r,r,r,"'_,, __", r.'r.. i&'I, -1 ,'r,' ' r�,,r� ��:': ,­,� , - ' --�. - ��",%�_, , ,- , , a, 0� � Iq, , �11 ,\ ,, ,��,,,� , �,, ", , , ­,;l,.'-l5�;e, ,�,I ... - ","""I- I I , 11'1'1�,11 I 1111IV - � 1�r,- ­'�,4-, N _,�I ,4-11"'," .. A" ,, "�" � ..,lrr_,,_ ,�,%��,, - ", � ,-"-*,-- ���,-,,�,,,�I ,��, - �_,,,"'-',�, , 46-111; 1.';�N ,;" , _�', ,"'ZI ,� -& ,�, ,*, ,��, ___, _ ,.,�­­',�, r ,:, ,.:"':.r r � I 11 , ._ "," , " - . " , P I,, , _ ,,,,,,,,, , I'* f ,� w ,�, 1, ',, -W �I , -,,,�, "'.." ,, 'i, ,:�,;'l,,, ,11 1 , �\1 ',,, " " - , I .I I,� I , , ,, "",,,, 'III,lk, �I ,, , •rr,� r�'r'I ' ""W"', ,,, 4 .1, I, r[g,_, I I r ,�,-, , w ,, r-77---I ' 1� K ,r,,�r ' ,,"�,,r, �1,1 I I. I I ,,, ,e� "�:r�,- ��, ,111�, r %i� ", _ , I I _,,�, I I r j, I , 11 ft , I 11 I ..........r" �:��" I r I ­ , , , ,,,,,, r r,, r ,� , , � _,�, " � I � ;k, "- ,I �, �: , � , , .1 "" ,�' ,,,,�,, .A 0"', ,- � ,, _,* ,���""',',� �1��% r I " An��-',',',,, r :,,,ip � � �- ,,��� ��� , - , �: _ I I - _, --, ,��,,� I ,, ��';:", - --,,e ",,)�W,, -11,11,; ' '� - �I �, �,W., , " ,,, 1�1 ";--' "" 14 1 1 �-M�`-�W, -,'§l'-,.,, ".,- I ��-?�l � ", ' I ' , � , , , ,�, I I ,�, r ,g�,�, ,�',I, � "I , ...r, I-M- ","I ,,�, ,, �" " , W , ,�', , 1 I ,, , I�,, I"`;"r"� ,,�"",�,,,,��, , ,-, ...... I I'll ", ,��,, I '11� r 11 r';r, ,� 1�`l� r,r , 9TW I " , I,r I��,,, I 1�,I llj�l�'111111 ,,,,�,;,,�,� , -;-,,�, 1,I , , , ,� ., ;, ,r" r,11 ;,�� I I I I � ,, I y r 'I � , ,� , - ",, r"', " ,,,,�,- _ ,%, "R� ",, - r I-,��, I I . I I I I I,V� , - ....�, I'll r"I, . I, - � r r r ,", - ' lll�l I�4 - - "1�1-��I 1111- I I "� ,, r , --" 'r,' ��­ 11 I � ,1'�"`,-", -,J,... ,11 I �Z�I;, ,�I, r-, �� ,,, , -r; �, - ,,,�-, I I� 11, , r-: ,1� -I I, ' I � I �, I I I - , �- , " "' -- �� '��-"',"r nn�l I r ,, �, " -ft "k- I?I-��111'11-,4 M,r I I--I 'i�� ' I� -��, -, '!'�,,-,<�; �,A -'�'�.�'� , " �, , � ,� , 6 �,l I,",,,,-I r_ ,, k� , lo , ,I " 9-1 I,I,`I "I �'A f"` , --,6,�,�-,` ,"-, ,_-'� ,'�-",��,,0, " ll'n,- _",I :r ", � IF m Ml,,`�, ,,,,,�,1�,,,,�-�,�,, , � , ,I,-�"`r'l WIN L" , �' , "' , ! ,­, r-, �I I , .�6 ,I -A" "'�" k��,I""',,I�"%� ��": _ , ,� -", ,�,",, `� I ," " , ,p I I , � "'Z�"3' ' ,"4� j� 12 , � ,, , '­ r - , r' , , , r r '-I , - , , - ' , _ � , � �­r4,-v, 1- � , , , , �',, �, , ," �l, r�'l , � ' , - � � _, krl �',,, ," , , _,� I - , - � -1 r]� , ,� ,, I I , ,� , 6�w - m I "� I , \11, �� " - - 4, - ,�,;�,� ,,,,rr, ll� ,, r - , , I I 1- � , ,I - , I 'r "r r ' ,I I- , '! - r i� C I I I i,�,, I _'�I�, I"�';-;'� ' "' ' I mll "J -,, I. lI L�� , �, ,, 11 ".,_ 4, .�-,' , I, r r, -W-" I �"- I 1%I 1��."�,� ��"Ir jjW 11 , , -- ' "� r,, �,111111111 �-, ,1 - r I I� ��l 11 .' � -r�r' ,�,. .....","" � � I,;,,�",� 1, I 'Il-,I I I I- r-- Ir , ,`-g ,, ,�'­ r' --;',-�'r '�-_, ," _ ""," r ! ,� -, , -,, I ,'� I,� , ,��"I" 11.-1 I I �.�"I �,\ ", � I, , I, ,�,,,��,�l , , I -1 6;w i MY , ��,�� ,, r r----!�-,' ll` ,� "I " -, - , ti� , I �: ,,�,'���;�,���' , -�' ,�, �',, ��t r r , "'A, , 'M�","'�,� �, ,� ,,,,,�,Nift'll 1,1,1, � , ,,,-,, W, 1,,,,um� " �,,. �"' -,�- All, I T , N � Ii h A I _- �,-,,,,-- I ll� 5,All: , -, - z� I - Ilk "IN, " I , �_ ,,� " '"' �'"',! ", " -I ,�, , , __ _ r�- -� , _,� ,� k ,�,,,,, "'� c, - , _"�I ". I , i , �11- ,� �', ",ll�,� "",�r , ,11 1',�Ul� I ,I - I Y�5L I ----- �;, - , I "��L�,,�,�'-L , L% �;,,, _-'-, I -, ,,,gl,,,, r ',",'� L, I 'r�r ," I ,,,"INK'a"'N" i",� rr , ,,,-,,,, 5K ------- -�- , I , "'�,�,�` ',�'�%,,'� j� I I 'L',r I li'l .1, 'r L , -",-,� . R� � I L y n -7777',,,�,",�," � ,,",.,I,- �J�,,, � :: �,' ,-� � , "o", I ,,, � ��, � , -- ' F,,,�%�'�" I`g�', ,,- ,��,,,,�,y,,,,,, - ,,,,,, , �:��� L .r:r' I ", I��,., ,,�,i - .....�, , -4 p","," , § - 1- ......... , � I IP --, `, ,,,I 777- =x""� �A,*�-4�-,-ll� ,� � ]`," ': ��� , -0 �� � ,,",- " , ,_. �11 , I �� I I I ,� ��,�� ,,,, � " I 4 - I ,. ,- I ,,�,, , I I r , ,, ,,,, , �"Ji L� I I,�-1. "' I r I r ,� ,," ,, ,L , �i� I , r I � ;l, "6 - I I � -- ,,,�, , , , � --, )� , � ;a le _LLL 'L,L,W�N 't,,4,�", L I ,,,enzX:: ,, ,r , , ,r��,L, , , ,=,��-- , , .�, , r .. j� r r I �........, " , r,4 1 [_ ," " , 'k' , , -,� ,,�, I,94k,",-I,,,,l',;,r-;4",Il� , "r ­ 0, ,,,, i , , �, ,-_�,,,;��,�* LLLL, ,_ 7 ,'1% I r r I I , , � 0, & z, F ,�'r r',' 11 r I - L , y,_,"", ,,, I I r , Ift" ",4i't", , "', ­ L ll�'I ,I L..� _ L ' ,, I , I ' 'k' 11 �LL ,_�' 1 ll,"� - ,r ' ' L y, 1114 � ", " ,, , - ,­ - _W�,�� " � ,�_ ,, L- L . I I I "�,­ r�L�""''"&'-,,r,," L: rr - L .r r , �_,-, L , ,r, -- - '"_ _ .1 I L , -'----"""_ , -r- I - , 1. ' ---- ��,'�, j,"q&, ' jr r," L L., I L . - . L I _ - ,,r, �l L I "'. ­L' _W��,�,�`M, I ��,,� ,I �-m � - I , .- �, , � " -, ",'?" " Ii� "","I'lli- ' " , L r -L,11 ' �1,L L L,rLL -�"'�""r� ­,r. . I, ' �'L,��_�`-,r' " Ir L" _!&','-- r, ,, �,,, �'_ "r r 'L L'�' -�",,, L��r' -',, I I .''�L , "L"!� , , ��', - '1,rr,�'' , "'L'� ­ ,". I -� I ' ,'�.'Ld �'�''I'-,- L",�', �L' 'LL "',"'L"'\i , ,�,�*, - � _"�,,!� i , " L , --I,� , " I ,�:� r,r ,��r "j" , ",'r r,.,,L,�,' a01,1,0 -, ,. I. r L r,,I I I- � I,, �I, , � , �7"�, , , I -, I I ",L,I "­�, 'IL,�!T,*­�,� Z'�," wj , ,", ,,- ,-��,,�,�� �, _ , ,,,."6 "_�,�",,,,,�,,, L, - rr'; I"Al , " � , r � '. M,,I * " , ,, ,:", ,:� , I I 1.,1 """,,�/� . 11 1;�� r , __",_�,�",,,,,�,,, �,�­­, _,�,�",,,,,�,,, r�,,,-,-, I ,L- I ,4,j __ q;'K , � " ,,,,,,, , I "� , ;�1�1111� :: , II." , I _ � , 1 5' �,- 11".- .1 I I L'��',If� -'I, _':� " _ � ," �1,1 ,, � 11 L"�,"" ,,"L""_ " _, ,- � , ;, ,�......,,,r f, I j . ,,�,�� "'t � ,,, , " ,, r,", , ,,-, I I L 'L " ,;�-r' :1, ""�L , r r rr'.,.�. L L� - "' ", "b , r 'r r ", ,�,-"' "' r I 1 I : ,� ,', - ,- - - ,, ,� �011'�"""-�"'� '��' " gi ' k r, _ r L L ,, I , A ' r . r L L. , r L ' L , � -_I a__'-_r - -L LL 11 Aw * 'r-�,_ 11 I r , I �, �, , . : I . _;, I" L'� ��"",,r,,r ", '1� - r _V r, � ­ _ , �, �_ & _ &,, ", � , r ,� , _ I , I 11 -Z #,, t � , , " , , , , � _"_ "" 11 ,,� , I- . -- � ,�11; "" 11 I:11, �0"11111 I I . - • " " , I � I, I I r L, L , -�, ,1� -1 � -- ," -- , , 7-,-,,,� - lllll�, , --,'-, , - -�, � , ' - - _IIw,- L ",,� ..11 ,-T ,��WY, �, 1*11F I- , ,, --, � %§-, ---"Y'-' 'r""r�!'�"- 11,1`1�1'11111 ,, ­'�,�'�� ­' a . I , , ... , '��""�F" - - ' - I ' r:r `"� ,'��, , � ��'.,�"t.'�, I , " ,�, #, , -L ,, , , , I , I � _ , , 'i " , ,," , *4 ,� , , 1� rL ;`�`- -_:- ', ,�'L ,,""' L.L� i �. k,"",� * - r W , I ��,,��., ,v I �l I , " , I ',',� I-", 1117"" -"" " ' �- I " , ' "" " r I I 1� I V ","-_-,,- �rrr, -:� , 11 I I 1,� I ,�­ I" ,� r "' ',�, � ',�',�, ' 1,I I �l "I L r,". "',,- - ,�,�tf " :'L v,,�,-&,ot��l ,"P, "" �7t,", ` ` �- - �__'. r__�,`, _"" , ' ___ __, �LL��, .......P',-�,,,, ,,';',I I ' � L _ ,�__, -1 , "-""-- ,--'", I I I 11 �� K�� ,' - q,,,",, Ml�',' ;,r L L,,,�--- ---- �,, L?,",r'­­:,�,�' ,�"" ,^"'., � "," , ,�, wl '- 'L ' ' ,`rL ",I , � , , ,,'. -,,�--, ,,",,�,�L,7, -,,,,,,,,,, rr L oz....... I�,� _,�,,,k. ," _ I , . , ,e, % _Tg,_ , __" , , -�,� " , _ , , , , :�",& ,-,, ----�"O-,, " ' � I , - --- ��-]�,--, ,. _�N" , � .,,, � , ft L ,I�, , , , ,, , ,_ ,, .:a _ ,, � I� _ _, ,M, I ...... ,, , r I ,,,r I- ,� I I _ _ , ', I ,.,- � , , ,r, I LIJ $01 , , ,� �`llll I" ,I, , r , I L r "I �,�, �," � I I 1, , ,�r,, � L ,�,, � " " :`.zap - Ii""'g,-, ' - I ­ I :,. , "I� ,�,,; , ,-I",g r ­ -r I,_ ---lh�'A' I'll llll� I I � I I- , , ":L"j#@p--%",-, ,,', I --- �, I 1, " "I L r , . , ko4wl L"",;: ' "";":, , -,,, ,,�,., , W0111-1 I ??I � - - -, ,,,, I L LL'- -L.-j '- " - L �11�, � I I , '­ :-,r " �, , , - - , ,�l r ,�,,,�, ,"r , r, b 1 ","'7, ,'_"',�',,_ � L ,,, . 'L -��r ll,� ��;,,, , -L'" r , L L :,;�w �,4 � ,', � L I , - ,- I-,, ,,��� ­ Z �,�l It ;�- �""�,-,=; L­ �'r'l I 77awonom, 77" , ­��:--: r " ,�� �.- I ,,".'-'�� ...�/­, ' - -1, . r, ' 11 ' L' I I ,�" ,� , ",I �:- r I r � I , " r I �l r, ... L .. � ," , - I I L L I � I r 11 r;­ , , =, '. -L2 I��,',Mw I I I I 11," , 11 11 .1.I ,.'� '­ . , , L r , 11- - - g',�,,� ... �� �,1.1111,1'1" ,S '?� r, r I I r ______,,,, , I , - 01 , r ,-", ,I I 11 I al i ", I 3' ; L I"""r� I 1111--l[L"I""I "'r I 4io,,,111 i �- L , - , , I -Z- ,T ���:-I ' I F, '. I I z I I I L I 4111 I I __________ ,­ , ,­ , """"""" 4 ,- a --,��- I �- WALL OFFSET ES EXTERIOR SCRI a � d i, 5 � r ,ti�rr- Ow FIR am CK . "'� �Y„.,F2, 1, :. -- ,.:, ..,:.r �^f RAc ! rl k n�, a MIN -0 \Z AL .G aka PASS�,ma•...>. a-..<, ..... �„4" 57z, ,. -.,<.- >_ a�:w..<u i- ,,.t§' ;r,,� .�.�,;, �«.;:-^s�"•,«•,. �. :> `" r{ k r :5 7' d P� , d! 5.. / Jib...;� � �:.:✓ � ,:'�' .#;>.,, ®R, lots— Ft _ n A c r � >a' .x ,rn3 J�e � ��;•,�, t r�•.. 15 u :.M. , a „�" `� y„ ti. Y' 4 m"./� r.,n r%•v`, fs i'`�',.L f.�. 5 `�., �' ,>�ic '��-' ,,:✓a '07 ri` ..«... -:�: •ea - .�3 i ter' , -. .,,, _, �.• , 3E<. Ste- f Y I 8Y � )9; \ € 3 :. �.. T :, ,:.i;�. " Y .-::;:., �::.., N .,�:-.„U, ,.::. ..>., ... v:.. ." ..'i Yxl ,.. ,.a're 1,,., a.,.-l A r:S�✓. p -i;., '�- _. .:: .. ....... .. o. :$w<,. !'.a. y`s �v S� \ 3 a- 3 C. f 9 °a!•: � > Vvv r' < p-M „,;... ,,,.,..-:€ ,.r..> - .- ,..; ., yet. .,,,...,- .0 ,. ', rz_'^z. - �.- :1; '1 �„ v rl,' .a• :k a� � Poll- . l':: 1 Aw > .._. �.. .-:.- .,,.,:. ) r- ,-�. .. ,.:;_. �: � •..,. 1. .. ..., .: �,. ,:. ,, ,,.i ;2�• �� ..:.. �wr,^c- ,: - (y�y'S .... ::; S:^>;1 ,,,.,::,.,,/ ,? _,:r.,5, .,..,. :F^»t, ..,. 'S,?. >�\ �. �'� �p4i ��,>.�•� fill Mr- . 4 ai �•?: :W ?. , ..yo iWAr .; « 37 —0 '':riiQ cap ' y r$ c< PIP s a ' ".:.-�ss, "y-`x .,-; `a�x•,'�'�$ r� " OAP Z y t rx s • _ 35 4 ,F r 1 sx m. y mi 22 -0 Q 4 sludge g conveyor opening F.F. 12'-0„ .�,�? e s i�• "� ^ter �a west. elleva-dul I d 54'-8" a, 5 x �s #x. I_. K pp x� s' Y W x. } R' eav y, WEEMAll FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1 '-0" - ,; ._. Imo.« ,yr -.. `� // :�� ,/ ,�' /� ,,. �;:,x,-n ,-..� ,:;,✓,� ...,r. ..,,r �5.� MN / f •� / C ,� .w�5r 3N / /r C Y n o IP Tv- 7, 7 , 4 f - z y IP south te-levaT-ion RIM' � S v / �L•r� �:, a �r< z / ,r••• y-:�c R it �'/ raj r:. Hl+,�� � � .. . s WE .......... I'M ............... 8 �4gpf t. •��e, .Ce A.. ':Id v, ��,/' zF',7�r ;,,i/g .m wj /,t,,;y v i ;.,., \s fir r �r ,1c sF>✓ z ' 49' P �? z3 " e£ { a_ 3' I Z i � � i r j gw 4 PRODUCT WATER= Any -STORAGE TANK,: 251' DIA ,s 1. metal pai 2. sto ref ro n - 3. metal roll 4. metal ma 5. steel cane -SLOPE - 6. finial _ CONC. SLOPE_ mechanic ------------ TER PUMP STATION RODUCT WATER TANK A _ PRODUCT WATER PUMP STATION 77 -77 J 1-: >: A I:. h 60 lA a. 0 I '.T Y• electrical transformers . P. oq Ip &,• .�.'.: ��" e,:�'a ,i .r.,: £=. ::tip y a RR 1 ., o,. � . u z \ or > L rv� _ . v f 72 O s' IW FF 9'-311 p. a FLUORIDE STOR ��R S � O� g Q � � AMMO .ECTRICAL EQUIPMENT key 1 101 1. metal p _ rtn rPf rn TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 2010 . 130 IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,COUNTY OF ORANGE,STATE OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL DESCRIPTION ANTHONYC.CUOMO.PLS JOHNSONFRANK@ASSOQATES,INC. NTILYlYO•NNIxPIW tAK e4xTrW—c my 5150EASTHUNTERAVE, ANAHEIM,A92807 (714)777-8877 e'¢t/eMA 6N A t19Y1BW R nwei.0<xAT IOl nt A 11 AmeatD At eA OJ NmiA�r JULY.2010 41e�CV/�I 1em60 o DLWenIIEmNGI w1 ASSESSORS PARCEL wmsr a aswasn o nc rau4mN euxoT erxn A>Cmle IAAOf.et®l4 . W A ---'V«,�,;,`" " 11 yy ,v I a`I��•••..•..-..•••.s . .¢ ER ul rtWN or rAa n—X b0 4 ent�T4om m IWn sAeI m...In SURMM nr on v exnulNl rAOI ! mm lux smrr Atmolr¢aum ro mu eAnlselol sAet a ma ,pml-NwN 4 wmalmc x¢ _ � ;"€ i I 2 i a � xm rATT MIIiR AYn�e a LOT TABULAnoN entTrr elm ATA orunaA.lr lOfu[AOre4Etr ! j� dd y y tt W n�a ww.err e.rwrmin_ram A¢RS 2 $$$ "a(� �� 1' - .mrT/r.nbo d7 , oNm m n./rw Aam �� L>Y.1t!m rt/>b AY4E � I � f � ` - �1€ � � € �1 i O •: INeGV[- {.M.!m R/16 RttOM $ € 4� •.'- �� -w.."^§"# k€` nr.vclmmrnarr nmanw.vrw a s > ' ass"AIEA .r� IOGL GIIIIN 1.1169GrE->lLtl1 m FL/srt � _ 6 d�V6"\ \ � 1 wa,\ `: Nona¢mwwMi - ✓" ; "a!' �a i € s y monaa NNA.e rwmmlr •'� It t yt��, �: "7�y, `�' S '�`, moaan ommrn An®ualerr '`' '��° � •< (f`^`... Sv ;-. '-_... t,. �� n �€ �... "� aocaa Aeoss rAs.orr �;� q�` .� �. � ` ----`l ✓ � 'ram € A § 2 41 IN, \ t w. IV .. UN—PLOTTED EASEMENTS lonoe snr eam lur®r oon�lm w xTaaaw wNlwrxe // ;/.,..,r ft � jl�� �. At rwmmlT Nw Auo Am Nmdet nr�x x rAWr o nr � -- mllfn?mAIrZ Ameem OCI®t 4 IM.N Nnf IDY T 4fiD4 % > ,/ AN Gaen/T IOR MD N®rrAL NIln®N/AMA 3M elle0¢Je11 I4 Ix/N mQf A.Z N1Q IQ `\ •.r�I � -`"y� �;, `:,`:� M INiI W Yt3mIX m e14CneWLY Wl Q m tAs dr xlq \\ / '�. �' Ye6l 11M1VW m AONm xL SBNAa:6 ni IAmt lin eao ��.e � � � nZONm IATO®f Yi em N mbT IM4 PA2 R Am a N94MY w..� n,ltN N ma[NT4 aAa mx mN v anm4 N5W4 /\v/ KAm IMMTLLnQR 6Mm E9BmxN m NiT?ne { AN6 tC 1D11 }A NiR4 MWENTS AND 1--V Aiatl t fl J ® M�IIRn ALA FwmpT-ff®[ M AYe W eel.eSR WAMMW IIAR­K r-qY M N®N x101f Im P.fg m mill dmg I!L'¢e ev for r .so nleasc nnYe rAamtAmerr nvleaartw a Aaea nxlo m nr Imlar AW16xr W rlN — ® lv4t-ulna u x rAwe arsr emrr-Nt>m oa�e4orn ® nloinan Nwe nc umrr-vANler eox l�mIX�wiz rm a�mn°�it R�iam�s An of rwl s4 -. rav®.sc um.Nr-.e r>oF lemlt .vo eAmna ler n4 oonA4m atc¢mm e a 4 Ck k � ® mm�n eon is Mr nmuno�-mmw smr-It®t rom u ,Y.Iwmiwm o orna,4 me®s ® Ma®eon o mY nmlGml-IFrI' rA1m6x1 '�W uNS Mu.Cl6vmm O Tmrn®Non a wr nmumr-nexl anear eonmtr nwlaaoe Wmerrnr�r ie000rnAe' �iemaex�r e.w nc 0 rnareon F�ANIW.+A V uvlvr mmmmN414 mm or Olnwl IQlws ® revallo ArAm umnlr ROOD ME DESIGNATION ® Nw®Aaoa rAmon-am 1� u aiwmmr Hove al ne rew rum rawAxrs nAu wn Id rmlTmnl{141®Ral@R;m¢I M ABR'T IIL'InIOA 8< ® PIIeR4D AOffi GIaIBIr-4V41eL NIWRTY a RaeeaD A0l1IN enN Ilee ID[Xi fer� MGS ¢S AII111.1L YINIDE V rinN1 NFA Olt .mY]J-zvm�C NMet YIMYS AAm NN AVN12 RInR?lE4 AMII 1 I11C NveK fA4lOIr/r3/f1FD w 4¢r ItR NR mNmmwa QR A�irAsmwlm�er lclm�u A�ixu'L�aav drum w ® ama mx rAarNr esmm w sec nn.ec rmlasAma u ® N�Imtrnsr° r�,acml' '"0110"1tO'� SURVEYORS STATEMENT ` Nm4vmmo/wnmunel Am oacrnrArwnm unnr u+omlr na ur wv 4AOT w w m umr w noso4l wr i ® Iesran w A^.nx xrc mNt®enea oR MetuTv so TARiI 81aI nor AI410GYI iNr raNArv: mlvNnwmrwlr nor Inver uan A.c n tna rAnw Ave Nmsc aatrAo Am neNlmaro nstmlex Ale osol eAat m�ssam mromANm Amruml aoei t= a m�mo..Aaml rAmorr nman w scc rtal xrc>sm®4 �nNla°A�c ror mieclm Nm na 11O +r�� = j';;.1 a Awim u r larmlen or ccc la rec minaNea 4a wO tH�' W xrG1GMYG e,ON ® rd @ NWT V MY®nAllel nR Iei Ioenlmn4 OR. Nt mtl ® tlrlI11N emlCr NXN rNm VM 104m.11AZ mIxIY flAm m AGVr e u�T44 x�O�1R RN merlC nlRlp nmAOII � VICINITY MAP N.Q Ixm•-251 ea­4 44 REV! 2010-08-1D a Y 'y-�l` y_.•.,,'aS>; A�9�+n,&Si)I f f 7 5 { 1 "x ..� ! � .�t�..�::;�; r 8^•-���t ,tt� na ,a -+�e'� B!'c ��ax .X. , . Fig" I 45, r•t < t ?' .+�. .'a"-.::: i•' <. tsex.w-:: ;:,a '. � •s eS h� •-7+ �._.. - ♦ ♦ _ ? �v •., :,. , ,.�,� �..,. a �r g .� ,...; �� ... �, �, �, sir, >F t.::R -,� � � � � —�� an . .sd5•,` ••�,'�ww,n,:? ,z..c, n%�. � :: )fa ii .�4 ,f�{ � 0 'j<°; .,a r•, �YT<!�3::` i 'I; `{.rd ;113 tii:ir : i�'" ��'.'7'j" �' ..3 � _u' ,.,�,, � -� � <,,,:y �; •--M..3 �w will,� , .. �y" , r �..,,. ' ,^.s '",.. >_� •� �ry( '. :.,,, "�;`^ r . e'«•�'`R�'.t�.. `�•�1�'.1%� q';1pp-- ',` ?i;7.''�, '•�'' dd<t �y , ^9i� i '^�i:„�"�. ..&P fi. a-.•, {I+..a2e»' t.., 11° § •;r ga` ,,, ..4..v.• .' 'a'` � ..,;?.4,:, s@rc"J9 t\..�_ a,. e r # :i- ..,,. „• f r. . .,.,a _R'}: a ear, ,Z r, i+.m.,M t,e,, �.7 't(�,.m.d �< d •! > . � •w.r , ,, u rr "� ;�'�i_# 60r1 .;J,i xy£'- r:M;: ix r u. � � ,€' >1 r'�ft,'� ;:�1 !! �=., C , :.v .,r• r. !!�!♦"+ C• ', x„ <,x„ ,;. ,.+: v:. A..f.•�,� .. �,• >6 «5":x" .arts � w� '.,� § 't merit ,� , x e .,I : .,. � �r� .:.„ " ' ram .a•,. a 1i m. G ci�z is £ ::agv': ,.,,. '#„ o� ,. :a� t•,-a , .., x < .>.�.: •. .. < ,.,. �€`' ,;<, a a' T--,s" r'f a#z �,^' ar•x Lx .R- ar ;..:Q:; ,�{'.� _.�:Z:"�a. :�'R�c� i;. +�� ! aiv.. � '4 �s�' a,*F-'.�.'.> :ri �F.s`d..o. :<x4 ,a„•rr,oT.. x >. `" :"�, A ,.. 3• �; �` sr°�,.,'i�#� i "`,i- x „I4. 'r '.x: •?h%: a�. .a.?::T_ �n7 E 'r ,�.s . r .,,,... W4, n .z, '§':;:' f v '�,` �♦"7i� `^i. ;T Mb$•,f _.:.. ,eC.....- e �....: .. :... :.::_.kx� .. v .t: ik.. '� :.. :, k.x, .,: �'`�a >r; �"'.,, +" .. ( "•i' �.t3a .,. _ :.'� 4 _.�v. y'"T..."d%' ,, � .,..< .'. ''-z.+; ... �--S} ,•T�6 Y I•°., ,�f3�,i5 #�,b�• .Y Y ,�>„ . D• � � .�..�� � ! _ , ,,,, ��E�t >. _..P � . fax 7,, q- � � �� „t� ,f(h x}�i ap•:,a -'f: .. , ..: ,�.. �� ..,�,„. Ed` ",;: " �• ip�ttrb"�;�,. ?;;', w U.r #i?�t:t ,., r a- ;y�i ' `Z�.,. '':.,�w xfs;, :��,.t ._ � _.- ,� :�.. � �4 f °' � ,iR! -.� r, i'.:: ' r '';�a€: ■ ps :w cs• o °,ax. :�• (nYe„ tom' ,,_t'' ��: � ,. ,f '� a >ro �ia p .�;,, �<"� ;.. .:::, }� �' r + x:ti x• aid. z .>�xa• � � .2.pr�:..�1 `p.<";F•s.,.,, '!��F.;,'rr (..sv, ,�d, � 9-., �{.— �:. a �• .ar=,+�Yi.,"`o.a a� '��''`'• <�vi r�.".•�.�-s�>w°.1' .;..,��:--r �t2�«'�` `+1, Tqu ,.'a!s.$- „q. '�•y�.,>t.^a. s �• a '^G"- �e�.a'w�,� �...� s9 4� •4,l fLF �Y' - 1,.:. k• �' i t,. "rear •�: t r � .,r""ra * �a<a. k ~� � ';,Rom., t �,�'�� xr.i;;. ,a•, ;,I+� L �1 „a, ,�''c _,� +x} � '` ;n r::�as 8 x,.=c•• �-`:trR`` .:aid a '®.' • ,.:: bv� e 'r '6", f, ' &'iF= : ',`�. m�^"+ ..., ': �pr°`- ,x,. :,:1 q •��. (. ;�-0 ::r.E•' / :s� >r, �.>r�: f: cs^a.• �? .a}kx;.4 ���`,:..; 405` _ �--" k€:,:":ya ,��r,", 7 i*;; + n ox � M �., �d,y .. i xr a_ .,' '.. .' •ia 4l w, .• .� _ �S it�.'a yi-��.'>�'��nay � 5;�. - � HOW. .�� a.,- M# .� ;�� rib ', •c_ 9 yty e ,a r _ Y �k �}� �: _� r a Fd t. ,..v .�•" e, � � '§ �. :�,. 'u c N'�'rt. -'� �' .,€ .n _3�;-0 , p ma,n' a.. � S �:a r..� : .w,5: 0 7 3' .3". ,4,' "nt v�F s9. ci• a�. tl.lf•� : < _ oa�'r'.. .. , � '. r,_<. ,x :..._,..,, ..... r - p ', v;'..¢...�� �'x�,-F ,q.".i� e;t' a5 t- _ V"q `r^ �l �, ..t,.k.�i.;. L„- t,;!t-a`£".r«,a�d3 a- ,.a'•:� �.:,Y .,{akr;>; .� «-., � � s•` �e�3s' ; <9 ssa� � ^� °r, �1�L 'i.s t e a, �r e "�i. -:4:.: .';'>t, �a a^x �. � 4 Ft'.d:t:3• �.. .-(,1.,' �.5 f'aS �.. 'tf?y.rt. C i2£: -x . �� ,.., xs::.. ...•� - �G., k. •. J .�. �- 4 t r'-Y .^: o-^" .A'1L`.:d�i�` _ ;4 �, ,q', x`y' i qi'. "".p �•�"�m.-' _E'=: <aaaa.?r r 7 ..•'1.aj tx:- ,�a� � "� .�<v. ♦. y.:tsb a'`b Fi.la x y,�y, ,.. :4w%h' 'i-.e A ,Y C ...,r,y�,a Fn k i 1 �; � k+• € i .. x";. .:.�'. '. !• , F ° X'. �]tr r�;�6 s%� c s t ((,_.. ,.,,.,f ¢q.,_, e , `. < - •-: ,.,xR` ,;4 ' !? '_ .'a1c 5t,ga954,` it :k -�"1�` '-'� ,,yyyy,, ..<. • .,er^ roe' �t� .. ,: '- � w .,., ,. ' �. x a<.. "n. ,�, us �*.'" a. rt: •i:.. ..,s ..�rt39 alt!? ,j .;fir ^'l+xt '= s>a -*>x'I .,,r a V`€ r: � 'k,S �¢8 ``t ��v' 7x• '� "'� rt n4 ww �� ��, .gyp x�'+��'1 x r� .a' Ry-:•� :� `� xri $;e,re: „ s. s q} , `.t„iN? .. ... ��wt ..,t f .,.�.a� � `� i 4�yx�•�Yzd t" .+,i<2 �.M„-€ ::12-, - k y..- t, r {y. 0 ~-�'.: • w .r 3 r�'�t�,"�+` ,.-, , .. r-¢sa :x,*a"% r"ez§ s 4 ,.- , s.. ryy ,•..,. �:a x* r. �f y ,+1. >-��a. `..<,,r1I' xv ��y a1• a.ti;a ., :. ,, '� "s. >"y ,+: S" ,s; r• Sf ,r";,r;., ...i,k �, 1 �„�'�J,�a'ks.�9,r -�`3>f ! dtb.. f4 'a.' ��>•� i.;,«„ rJ"� _ v'- €` _w i a.�„ b' .m'7 itli ;' »€,»:� a r z• .irk �, - ri.}.__ ' 'r",>p. ,.',� ^£'� .} jqC`. ».,xs•.. '' r. -,.,'7.,.. m <.... -. w � .. �4i. gj}of ,r,-f�' � >'xyr�,rt ,+ �, �' W- t�� �S "�� ' ash �e � qg, ••. 9� Y �i�x:�u.r�,. .< , ', .",k ,, ..:_ t�• ,,: ,.., „fix' � ,, .. . ,n . ' nr� .,,.t,"� '�� P,FA�IRx,D.R �•:T n,fz(:�. r ., .,. .i,,,.: ,,�". „.>ea'star.+� � a,. / 'Ye •. - �,„ ,. fir,, ! i;r° 4 ���e �� �.,, ,. 3d+ ,a � �,. C x. �,'ax.'•u'fcs r >�� � 1 .,1..:c, $ :;�� s •" ;,.E ,f�: � -� -,�'. `'�' _ t}qt .7�„-.#'�Z x.;k, 4�a�_. ., ,€=.tc�F,..,: ,: ms' d.�a ,.. :p. 3., ,r..r��' � '( .t." �',!9t19t , �:, ,z .•S 5`v",... .,z r�,» .a � } ... - `, .. • t r: e ,,,: sip �3 ,»�f � :�4�� c„ ,�- ,v T..<x0 a� �'?- i,,. . ,, h.,_� •��, iE 3' � �,, ,�:,.',x .t: �, t a �� t �`�S T�,�y-,p ,,. �,�i, s '°�, � ." .., t `�!;"�w w �mlm�. p�_n.' a s t r, 4�;F�..$(e',t��A f. r, +�e: 1. ,. `�; g,e �,.,,g` ; 7 a. *t ' ����;t `yS.r, d?" -.ar,•�., �` .,d f `..:, �.- �r .rw s.: i'3�,.. ? �• if ��?} i��+ <i: �2 t`J i3,� -•�.fit+ �. a� 4 k d( ". _. r .:, �.. ,.. ,-*na$.e.. �-: �, i .a � .� 1 �\, i t V 1$."iri ii .ti r��WS :. V:4�,S':. { "S 14+�• d&.. „.r,A � \-, �., :�lL! ,.a.A,�t , . F:'i' -t..4, ,•r,. �9: ter. X^'. -,.: .., +� �,' �:. ;��t.. 5< • ... c, .mn5 �x��$•�'g„e ,. '•1. _a ni<. I�,.7 5 0d� n°b�• � } o- ... q. ,.<., �• ."�'; s o.a::- t u'•' '�� 'e '.4. ,1F)P'. <d"' n a'� . .� :w ` `,>_'.: s:,» ;,c.W:..a 6:-.' xf ,1,rT ..z .. _:. .,^A. t, •aj�.M1;. ..,3,i -r '9i"✓ ..,P + 3 -r., 'g..».�r:?.. -. ._,K .,, .. , -,-,,: ., ,. N ,:.�Ff _ 1S° „z,a.+ .« . ,•.. .c€. d'f+` '- . •�'m- =��''� 5 4 <C,'4 S' x� }� � .�• �f, �, � ,HA�MI:LT '.N rA, aE-_'o,` :; ,. s ,.� "' ,� � t»~. �,.. ��:.<- . _..>r.• ! � `�^'� t;, , :..;r ti• _� ,,fir � ,�� • a , r,.: �,ai ♦ � � .:x ..?3 ..,�„ ;' ''a<.i. �,,•s< , ..�� Lao- is �`°'� Al >, 1^ • : 'h' tay .« rA �� m�`"`�r.."'Y ae, �• � •"t �: �r ri.4 r.,{. "�:•"aT �x..x:.' 7 �'- �l. •t r a, �•, �:�, its`; '� „�•as;.j � _ ;� +� ,r.., '�ra�" a a'" � 1T. .�#.: ,,,.', ,r, � ♦ ♦ az-� � d 's3�:.��pp �' P.."kT'"x 5# R't.' �'. -rv4' �. �. «,a..z .. �,,,.. 1.`,y ��` �'. ;x•'r€ ,�.`' eF:-Xcs Yam, t .-� � >t'r'q., .'Js.`:.'N,' .%,�' 4.x.,a}p.<. �. .r�4y e 9. .:�t' Pt'"'�` � •h ,i!'� ��'- i 3� _fit 4' fly..; �y x'a,r "fT,a -� .^r °;a ,, .. ;? ' :t ♦ ♦ ♦ e° .��4•;a;'d „t :rs.. ✓ y °'$. ., i <y uk'' ab '� _ �S ..�{'d't"a ",4! _ _ �'i�w"" k 9 .:'�` :��a.4,?an '8 ' �., n,,..�:�: �4x o�.x4W ✓ +*:sx��.-^�' , n ' ;:: r. s.."J,- ::.'>;�� ;-, a;'- 'ta. °awr<a IDs .�, �. ..�� ;-s R,.ts<•. .,,s.. g a v '�;xl'# a„ .. , �a•,<" q 2•a .� � a f - , a..:..9 �^ �„ a,,.,.:�cd. -� �,;a.M> ,.. , ,: <. t` v., :r'�', , ®' �.. �` �a�,�� r' •;gym? :, ;�.�a� ,r�. ��, 'w ,;;: at r (��, � a.>.x$+e �� =1 C h .'€ =z h=t � �> �� �� ,fit' _ - ..'3.x a^+w%a 'a' aa �v�?•«<.. '� ..�,e°r>'r> rpz :zo �.sa; i': .y�Md�... r tY•` - r a ,�f.="`c' ',� --.'m. �':�C , > ;sa�,�,_t';�� ,. ..,„, „„�.,:ga ." ��' q.:,� �: ,�-S:: >„� ,„ .�.,.' -, n: ,. .. Y,;:. � e psi"' _�.- 4"='�• .' ..Y" .m«�,�w; ...,,a . i � , ; ,. ,... �..� ,.c 4: � �•.;',- '.� ,:.. a ,a,.:,: 1>,::�a'x°ax :%19��r` ,a� �[:xi:� ,�{= �7< ,y - .;m ,:",�,� - efik .,. ..;,.. . ... s,,,..: , ....� .. ., <... ,•�.,. <,.,�. , ,� .fi',`��5�.s„ ', 'r 'S'a+`�"r +o- 11a;•�da,$ '.sH�,'.fpp(�y , a�"'a` .". 'R e..., ., r ": ,,. - "��L ry Li •:.-."x.' .7 tn4*r•.; :.:>:" ,._..: ..r �*< =:.c-, -1.'arr"sa `� ...3i a:.$'° • 9.t'' -- 'CAB. ': t:<. - #,... �.'�,..,R.-3.� ',, �a _>Y',.� % :. -,3i� 9,> a'.: `eiC� I;' �a' t`w�..� '*l 1 :.3, ^^"'+'e;. , av , re' � "�o:s ., :-. d."%'m ;.,ga`. aa' �.'. > ., . Y�.,t �;':, .: f"L? / '"�s=�*4•:- s•>q* '. 4 a��g'y.. 4', a,,,,� :r [ -.,"},sue„""_ . ... h,,:.. ,,,r ,. ,, .•' ;s.,z ,a: Y�6. '' �(-,n'. 6 J' ,�N �II'B .'S"tr4.; ^d"-• Nix g�•� r f i S +ao - yg .. A.2,•g. � < �., •.._ a�d`,&� - .,., i' n." � 48 a'f:. A71,g�r+`::.\ ' Eel[ tl_ "i''.>pp �y ..�4 'm.¢R t.bP�>`, f .b�,, y aoms ,:.+ ....>.•�`Y•b(.. .,:f y < � w',:.:o- � „ :v. C.m `'v '�-.. ^',.,.,':" T '.{..,5 i ffi' -0 ..t�,7 a`t,b, � :ht w ,. � .. 6AY! rd..�,e•A f°e�> � >k .l xe � ':. n::, ; .vxi yg y,; .. ',•.���- / •> � a::{F"d __. 4..,;.. < # . ♦,: , t {{pp.�suy'A, �„� p�..< [(tom{ 6 :':zt ...-- __ .,___�. - .-:- ,_..._ .-.-. ._. _ --_. ,-... "dl#+^iHG &.. s �a ri 'S W.:<? aY!^''�F � k• fit64a,a$ >i+ e'.nal:. afi"".7�9 ,tr'S,2•'" y ,..:. ; •. :„:'.,7"< ..p. ."'_." ,i ,, .?n,0 E .. 1"' .. ."'i ^a _ _ _ _ <L,,,. � .. ,,,r,", as ,..... .> : ,. ,: .: .,. �,�,t, �.. _. ..... -. ... M.. :.... , •�,:.. ,vEwm, ':::y :.y't::;.; .,g"a'='- >.,c�, t°:: 1,�aAa :. . ..- „..,: .•, '., � R ,u , .::.,, : °ST�;',"�.... -.. ,_:..... _.. :,.:.. a ,. .. ,,,. ... .,e �. ,;-� "' •,'3F'•-_,sue".:'. "2" :'"�, 'faai•. ::._uf< .. ,el_ , r, a;: #.. eery'• -�'%,>. � ,r ,. �`�.- , :, a , T... .,.. . .d::.s„ ._:.... ..:.G .A... m ..,.:�> .# 61. _e%�,x=,tt. }. 5! <_', ... .�:.�a• �. ,5�'�'+' C �_ �"',:+', ,"'L_�s€-,�. Im,w vE�s. gill : .,i,.,k .•:s%:.�a3„.. !t �., *';,,:»5'.i``�a`.. R�, ` ^n-"_'.'`✓+'' •:;:;..•.' a. o-.+...,w, % }bra ._. .,1 '�',". d =r. ,,f ;. r �' .r • w. »- .:,>.. r. ..<:'.`a.:.. .,.. ,.s.,s+,:s... o.�. t,#�""4. .. ._-.a'S'..t,n_. _ .e..:: ,.'��;.� •; .� � '" - .". s,T .,.._ ram., .&+-•.a. .e.�. ;� ;.. r ,..d:9, :t 9: � ,,,.<.. m�" "S«aa� - x� -""� ."�ar;�, 4 � ,'y..v�r-; ;�:a... ' .•x .. .. --:_.. ,, - `.'s•,c ... ,. .. iaa.:vxm a eT �' �,..�-�' <, i. :# .. ':.. 4;- .,6s �, aT�,R,r' �,. 11,,,,,, _ ., �.:#t,> ..._. ._,., >.�- ,: ^a>u• � �.,, ,,. e :.. A.�a.... ,aka:.µw< ,.•+s>- '. .,- --x !; �., .� mw��`�r's, ti3T�. p,r li „�-• .tom. � - � t +n. A,., wg. :r.y. ., ,; . : ,. Yi;,. ��.. a. w'pM G>,Kk�� r0,s' .>� ,y'.�•. °UN;tlIM'3,N e �ea?^'>�?N°�'�.; .: .W.:.r r � .;._. ::.., +,, --� '� F;'. �s ..trp.� `xr°8:+�n.���.�.aAa`- - 4n �$'.tt� � � •�.. , z i t f. n �_V : ,. ., b '. �c'. >_..,,..sn. •a � �F * ..' a ;.<^. �f� /� V ,,r'fif •a1tl��,�.. •`f j e� a.�«,o� .#'].,.�,asa.Sv�KR,.wXt r.. .:. , 1 ,... - .,6.Fv.n• ,..z o, _ ,.,: 1 ._w ., .•,. �? � �r�^a°.`,: [.11:: .N-,,,.®,;., ,�_ _ t. `,�� - 3nc�'Ht.�, _,�r �?tTa�A�< �,�,xs � ::. _ ., r : - ��+"� ��'��k 1r�C� �:°sr,4 +t 3�r;�a -�,�" aeA� •fit»%. ,., >. � r?;T s�• .• _, ate.,'._�} ,�,. ,,,.�."�`t". ,:,", . �,; �" � �s ;�. : <,> $s ¢ ;;w:: k D�y` ts,. � '+� >-'.,�a .�. 'g�'- !-'� 'E8 ",Rtws>•...x ,^Y.` f t - �,.l ..77 �^' -:� ..: „,: ..< �+.,;,�...- .;� .. .. , �. , ^'-: ,:;'�" < .-�.., e .s,<;. _ „A r '�• 'pti; m v w�t kgls �', n. �•,ap mn.rv..�z-,'^.C?¢L.eT >Q�an �- y,. �..vp.. Vk.� •_. ", �,... ,e': �`� ;f �:a�::.it � r '� ":z:' ,�i, ,� u' :6d +W +�r,� �`'� T'.v ra•hsav .s'� ,,.e ,>. .., ..1`'a&'`,..,; "ie'°`..� n .. ,' m ,'..,.+4e.*"�c3aa -"''tdo.•a .. ,,.: - ., u ,,::�;,� :,� �.—..,.�«� rqm"'.�5 �, ,:. � .r ,, ..a.. <., ,e ,;D,d=?r .:. - ,.,. 1, >.:.: . �^e�a ��.a. �, mow: 3,, •,;, a .•n_ro, s ,� � 8,",'�,'- r��:re',a.�°'��•+T r-„ �,� ; :h' r cgizs. ��3.:» .. ,B�d&z�3f n 8`.'. .a_:o-�..,,y4'.,. .. ,..,,; :,: � evr �z>�"'.:�s it^.r,es�:*"s L. a,: -a. c•.- _k.. •��Z`�>•., r ..:,., ..< a ':'4 "'... ,.:,' �x v{_; >::,-a= c,7, _`.p 'A ra';% a.a's'•asi x<9, p1 ,f..�. .-.�..,,�,. ,,x�:, .%,..-,,. .. b f. ":,,, w•' rh'.•.: ,°;,.r.�etaza:l.:u.?�,wtr.ra' .y?s., iIN aSybes,<,� Mls !�'_ <ac-%a-+s Yd, u be: �asams: m•s 6' r `3s"_. �y- k`°' q , �<�han>.. •4t ,e�', ex,e�ma�9 ° at�SG'.� ^1 �. r• a �yC.. ���.A3'�^ .�. � `*_.�.-. D�._,. .., ., , e: .,,_,.�,. ,,.�.>.a '. .1-. ,- •< .F,. ,;a �°'." % ':. d� t#:� :.�*.s s7m �,+.' " t, �g ,-tf, r,y', �.• �G: .�.w6 .��... -.. 'i., 4 <e_, . ��� :, p�aye �. � �R �,�. ..a.,--. .�'y i• "'-,a` .�a. � 4.'' -=s. r d�� r9... � �reY�4" . .A ..< ,�- _•Asp +A §, «.ca;�:%% �' � ;,.. � �,�'' �� ,�.t'� �• �. � �. }.° .�#1. i ,• '..._, :m�a{. � ,•.7<k ��:wa-+r r r» „fir '" � � a `'` ,' 'a�� 4 .,�, � „, , �• ,,4:'$ ""•"s ,,� = � ,, ,T,::A "'' c �"a6�#�: .>... > �� c,. ,.� a ib'r'"r.: w '�'',E�'i< < c.- •. �< '3� 'r-,... .,,,:. ., a y":.z� a �, r',A"=�.�,y>i „ ^£Z',, e7,'�,p^<•ty,. pryem+s. Y�+-_.i#7: . y{. .,. t :t., .x+x,,: N 'F.,:�,`' ',. A x' �., '�.n; nprrA ,. ,'_.. :'•9 i' d+, 'i' �����U<"-ti#,c:: f as - 1; "a: - tga` s. 1s'anH�,00as;,,� ,.�#� � - is .lsanHMooa:e M"Rxid,' * ,, .r" s=at .�i. p t a e ;�;- P ':r r ;: e, z„z. - ,>•' .'...".. ;�a .L; �". e ,"•':A� , ,. � ....,5x,�`:,; a, � _:..;-i.'a.,'�� !" dr,' ', ,71>`^,- -a 4 de4 .,'.,�,CY,avID' '�;,..> ,asw ,1. ,..'R,i ,Fp,.....; :ua.�'�, .,' �<�. ,..� Sw.. +,x.Mv;. .. .�,..,.::.f_•., t'.,.. AP.. ,�• �$ <',,."gip '� E� ,,,- . TK.'' ',•R dixdt€.,„' 'n '�,4. .. ," E ., �.<. ..y.''�'+.E, -:.: �a w n.�_. ,-�,. ,..r .. ,�, ,.,s...,. <r -:'§ ,k IR-"•. d -<tt,-., a�?-" .rN�: r.,*. R �,...:�., � ..,..� _ :,..:a,�r• R'k'd.#"i..:: ;. . ,,<�;- :..;.. .�a ,.. ' ..... ..` �a�a`a•R•:, o.' s,5� �1e®�i:' „ sq,.-9,..1�,', � . ,,.y, � :..>.,. '..r,a„,...,•'-n=1 4 ..,... ,: :� , �`. �,,,.�y, s ��,..-. � .. ,, ,!�': �,.,,�: .. -mat ,:D" �:<: .A � ,,.a° '`.:~; #w.C�o.� ".��� ��. <�x".k,!y.,.. �%%",'ey :.k� .:, •; s-.",,K...: ... «, ;� (,. %E;r.-.,-., ', ,,,.. �, ., a. .., »' ;.. :.,,dw�°'�: Y •re4. ms ";x rP G:.„,.�{•, _�.c> �„'�, '�s:,�.`..D3�:a ,.. ., g... .�;�..... .s.i4,F., m >r ..,,,.; � ..,.: a: t'C.;?�.. w ,<,..,.�: v, ee_ S,a•�.: :r.:tr� - .�«, ��¢¢:' 2j a'°"'.M - .. .,:..,,a.,: ''� £. ,: ,+ a.. ,,;•�+ , ¢: ...-r-. , ,,. .> s: , ..,u,w. �,b `Y_,.>._..,� e-.e..9 �' 'lea` `,::;1 ..'a5".. ti K�,nmra 'ra ..�.:,+ _. ... :[3 <r, �? '. 3 �`;7' :.: .:.,. ,_" � s..... .��,'..,.-° o,,,:, ,x fdy �,a sat: •ro,. P..t•,`^r[u+ ,anp.�,3�l.ka. r'• '4 � �.. 9 �' .1. `i A�r. :Y.:. -J T�Ax;t. rR �`.:" r. -.z ^-:'�»�-- - ...�,. a54 �'....< a ,. w •ei�,.:'� 7F - ^...:� ,�„�. ., ., .".,,q ,.. _ �' "� �,�; .,ai:', '' �•�..R Ps �.: -:.�: r•.<rr=:s - ' ' .,:'fir: .. ;�: �. ,, �..�_. �,:, 2� .�,.• p� a� nA.� ,l�` a.. ar: : ...a c.. .: 4. A'`'�f. `, ..:..�,",^,�� .`- s.�e; ..: �h'��. w..: �„ _- •pa ffi 4 1 a?n� .,'", cN �.�.. i-^'' ,„,•„7r.. "� .9 �' .r.'_;a �.. �•`k�- .,i?`' '�i. z'"+..:< � S'a�.,, „pa;.,r..._ n...'b�."r4 ,.,€ r, t; 7 �,w,G� „}C saki' s•G- >,�' � a. r.'�!',w,ar, s < <rt;a;a;: •t�%.'x,` �`�,. ,. � >a r. i,,..�s S� a s' :��'�. �a'r,� r :as,=:' ?..r.,,xa, ."J''9" t � ..�'::"'¢.'.;� l '^..,. y.��'- - .h �- ..' ,- z-�� � ,E�^-a:a $,u. ,� ..,��,C.�,t;�.^.� � _ ;- ,,;t--''a:5"�a•`� r:47 ,; ,s ;-A 4 ',,... '; �r.- .�x�r I.., ,.:,, ,5,y, .:�- i%t-aa' `c�,- �,L:a, e `4 r•,a> ;.;.,: � �.a-; ��:e `�,a a., v ' � .•.k.�,:x ��' y,;.f� �<�p' __i ,.A^ ..s S , ra• �N X,d '"4 % , .._ ,3' ,o .,.r, .'"_..-� �S'v� r,.,'�: S. 3�., �y - ,G +�'�'b -I+` xl':.t �•,'�`-f, M A f, ,a r ,k ,� n �s„: <,, �„S �i�er '�«�r�� ;�m�. r' m a. ' '•� rA� ,a;c "�'� ��,,,A �,t"-=� a�". ±�,�.w,x.� ....�. " �„Q,, ,�'� .;. :;v. w. ., ni..,,.. 4Y .. R p..,... -, !- �, .,.-.x �,. . r9.��:' n,: •'.w`r ,i w,l ,z +°5_v aWms+-' .>w:'"L+,� 1 ,<aa.,t' � n Q ;; ., :; . .•yd.,, ti a ...,., ,..... .,, "3. o-.Y,{,t. - mM m'., 3 r :.•ae...,,,� ,.,. k>.t.r..�} .,,. :, ✓"',t Fw':if 'F'` :,';w. „vE -'�� e ,�:� � � x�. h, .. t>- :I' „�.. .�,. s..�:... - �-1 n<s .I�E°s• fr.'+"3e:, .;.e� .. ., _ •,.':; � ,€ .: ,.�,n'r.,� �.;•c ,gaqq "v,.' ,m k"I ',...� L ;,,... .. .. <.. :. ..<; 5 >.r,.-.:.' _ ,,,..: ." .,.. -,.,;.r. a�•• .r.� n-h,a. D7 ai"_.,r, ':tE sy,-.w3�'r-'%� � a:'.. d ,. ..: -• �:. ,n.'S. .a 2 r, .....- ..:�.;{ .,w� - �,. 3''S< ,.# Mz� -.'^�:'{�' ;� x,<���. �.�°�+ i�•r• '-�y, m�, x < _: ..'. „ .r.. �,� s.,;�:; B",9" a.:1. :� :xm, a., ..,,. b in.:t,vx'.� z .> aa.L..ev'�• a;.„"'a"mnw 'fie gAila<-':r a'szr-,a.,. � r w �� -...�, '�, ,.. -,+°.>, :. .-, .�.- .... . ",.,,,<. ,.p>� �iER.,. (( a je' , :;; -�,-a. >. ,..o3mwei�, ��., �•a-1>,.,3 w% -�&�".>. 4.-T.�r. � -k.rtaC�� .Q.�. .�''�*x+ „ !!Aa .Ntd t. <,....,.,,,. ,: „..<„-,:. F:>a; ,,:,s .. _.>.i r. ::,.�..,f� -..,a,ic.A,.;'a4 4 � "•: t S+' <. •.�.s',+,-.s.- -s. N�•a 'a;. "Y fi.7 1'H - :.", _. ,,., b ;y,.. •-.., ._<,,. , ._ .<,..., -"v `4 .a;; y .< „°;. w',: .. P�: Mr .-.tea ;"� w,a ,. .v-.,. .. .:> S ..:<.4Jw`+ .._. .. 3;-'i9E.a� 6`"',V„ T-,. ... _. ..i`_ 3". m.•, �r n 1 k..- ar ,Gx.A,*v'F'„�':..zaa �.. :: � �: a - .•�._ ,,:, -�:__.,. f,.•,.-�._ � ::s-.: „. , ,:..,. a a„ .,#, *,#' Ry�g,p�,„ ,�"•r3. s, ... >t' < , '§',.<�"E^•. < .,. ,�.;, _.<.J� .: �r ', ,.,„:z.—d ,.�,.a .. ,. ,, ,z✓� �'€� ,T t3- 'r' yd5�� �' :'�' .,, .,_�- a _. D .. . #, r .. 6:,> ... a .,. t,.`.�•^. Ev .�. ';x:..,��4ri� ......r `��-%;,�.:. ,a�i»` :. ,. :1, ,t, • . _ , . s�„ ': >,: ��:, ,. a. ✓�..a,+G �r t� 'h qua ,<.n: ®:�',x t,fa� :�.Am_<>_.,@,:�„s _.� tom' ss f,r � a, ® . ;"" r � 3'PS���. �a,�• �"' �x! 24k�a a c. �,."r�' �� h 'r.,,,,gg,,4 A, r .►:. $' ..;,�" s 10, 'a d».,, ar• "� Ir' ' D r •:'�- s .a.:. :•.. „r .» .so:g i ,,rre+ %9e,.:':oa*,was.o, ':'z£., t ` ' .� r „SR +;,,* x.W-_'k z mom„ -r x i= -.; '•� oa`� -a�.x.?a•:: t,�... ,d IDb 5�,, :;.. i�� c� e ��' 's�®aa�: -r. •ate '* ,�„ �S""e,.l- �'' .,. r�` -�.�: "�""_.. �..a.. ,Y.T. , ;4 't: .,,: ,,> aF. .G ,"�': w�" .,,.r>.,E.,•v�.''(�}.y�,� ,�<,_ •.C" A w' .us, ,,Ay,. m _ '., s €; `.. ,-<;,�>: a�..� •,a. ", �a•Y :,e :�. , .,�;' a s. .:<5x� ,�?.Yy�.n•..€� : :�f3e •�•�•:,': ,.",�`.�,�� "A '�$' ,s >� _•.: ,.,to . _., t; �v. .. . ._, ., i nx � �. � >� ���_ ,;r,xw s Y. �� mx,i:awm 8 "':�'samT�P,-•.;. ,a�4•Aq 9r ..,.. .x ,d'• ,r ,• „ �x : ...,., E a _._._....swam an}ems,,.;• a; $• .4n, ;., -Y, a� a. ?`ErIDT ,S' •.;K..w. r-�. rX-,. •r.,p.,i'. aID :A sb u,', z,rtz:xR, e. �a(CA�:ax.». :@ •,Y�, � 'i� .v 77 s � L•:�.*W .,,'�:. ''r.:-.. -... �:; Z�,2 -..:.. ,..mom""r w�a.'.*°s. i. _a'•:� v ak° I`.i -' +f �ra.� "':4�i,- -.' 1A9a'`( <Ea�PrY�W,3_�.. 'tK ��' .";�, �� + A .E •.:.Rh _- :A 33 a'r ,. � r ,m,., �e.r•. Il„P= ». � ,.e s'tk -'' - '..,�:`,v.t'r4,<, i'-eIDc �i ' +Mta'` 3 n ,. >, -' q,a.,, e .a, x des I _,. ;;•.f. 4:`3.0 „< ,3 t. ,..® : '. E: M.emu ,,viyxa s£ r. >£i, t+x,artsA•ID r ,c ,;;,,-.:. r -.v -' ,. r ,z ,.,,...��� „ .G•1 .! s•� +. n -,a.>,:, v '-ri-a''~�� �''>"' i .,s,.. a"arr_ a ^f',.<..� .:.: .•. p+A3.>� P`L'^"'�:� t -. :. :.. �� � ' shr $::':'21"4 ..4 dq "-L.- <.R; - j•.'rt,�. ,,.. µ,.,, � ;. x >v i-:Qm� yp�� e m �' �."v-a�.:'�`'� aea�e A t a�,,y: �¢ r,..�«i..%fw- �' aiAis, `'•� §�<"; '":$,et., ea - - .._.z:'•,e �,. ,p.. -,i �; �-t>YFa'�., '.iS,7"' ID,f,: t ^ '�.g'1y+�S'+t�sl. :,� .,t�,asr.,. •:„�ra... h,. `�� '~ '"r,'a, "`: ^r r vv&• �� dffii +sk` ux s 'Y"�j.T,a ' „' , ; .: ::s'+t'.# ai ,, ` 'ae ';t, sa .F..• m"s„•'r• 4 9m- � ?:;y ��ras.. ,. ;p.� � ,• ... ',. _, ._�-. � x.,r'd,•-_ •, ,k,w:. 1.k�_..•- ..,.� �►:- � +�,z ;,tA- s a„ ;s,- .e° ,a `r"., ' ,2'��m _ �a�m '�'rb� • :. ,':.° -w.,a:, „i`®.,.;�p,,..:i�1' , ,., .:: _A, piL, .'te•'sx,•�,x,. i� .�', r ,L'.,y T$;.;'� ", aY,.'•,x:.v-r:. '.�.y » -ws� ,,w`$ MAS .0 tkt � a �> ,�i:a,2" � �'`�•,. .Sa: . .• ,: a r;P- ., ... ,.. ; ,-: ;• - '4 az,."4+d '4:t.. ?$• 1 4 � ,,s:". !{• 1��. ��. uF a. r•,:�-�8sr ,,:<;+, ._..>z.. ,'Rq;:. .:��-'.. .W - - � :�-bv.V, :f �f;� A��:� 1�•,S;c-' �'�`b ?,S3'="s, 4.�. wits-• Y." .. �,.:r} �. , $ :G .:h3 ='2 d' 31 k. "`'4 ht•zb'n cA' a :r a� :< fi :ate ;5s' ', •: .+s' S g q ¢ w a •b rE ,•...» ,.." ��. 'E. .-r:T „:.� `�_ ':;::., -:-?='. >a „. !ss a," � S'a.-.. .a•, �. „a= �; .,�.s �.:,' r-- - i. ,, 4 .+<»-:tat ::. -` „ ,.�.,t �s:�t,•iz��x �€r, „a:v� ¢�... '?.e..C. ..,::t„ .lb '�`.. ... .-,, .. ,< yq yE�;,`..• �.F>,A,th,a- - �,E,`P`€•n 3 : tl r �_ ;o^ a._ .. ... :'aa<• ,<„.:.s�, h:.: `< .. >� ,,..'�`-�`> , � �"��p, '•«.o �.AAP�P.f� �� „ D:,, R aa.e;..,k.f, ,�•a•-•r »- ,e ..• -fd,.. �,�,,,„s- .y +,+ ttE�, 4� ,r x• a �'fr,rt'.,"' nx � � ,�. Ya - ^L7 M" 4 i:• "adeS '_.�Y'r - t�`. r/E 4_^...: < --- i `. t;•t `. - :�.:. r#.r: .,Sya:-sr; � 3t° -S tw,•=,&'...krc ;ul„�.� zA7 ,a'"' i4 +"�, �i� ,•,i'"a...... .„., ,,,• ,' �:•._, .� <,. :.^rtt;s• ',' a«.,>e;a.,�''K,4.., [S ,�}3r:� `�.ci5w- r :fT= a..�., :. ,, .,` ' .�s � s F� ��.!, ,��,� � a .,��, + "' T;<: �. .�•�< -"tib ,.: � _ '�` '�Z .... ... .,:. .... � ...w.;.ryry.. ': �^. ..,a;ax: .: , �• .-:,., '', fox.;,"" _,4"v+.}z7 �,.. s;.: .e.,,.� �+';, .b�. x;,.i,'a.? ,... >^nr,^'�r "aa�7,"'.3°' %g•. n ...�.; �'.- .. :,� ...„_...,..> •... , a {xa;a 'H „>. " .... ,.:.,-,;Via. �rr' ,;,. .A. �..: ..�v���a54. ^+���w. : � z s:. '� P. �e a, ..7 n - •. :.-:.Y .,..., - +;e. -t.-: A's: `aa ..fir._�,r,,:F t :,-a� -a ^• R ^,' ..<. ,k-C �%,::�:.s-i#.'.�.ji krw:.�e�. .,4'`,.,.:_,.;,J,-:>,^.�.-:i.,..^_'_., S,'.�k.�:.�.�ajrr8,'-='.v%'?rde,:.'r. s � ,-`,a."a'.>*,'. ....-:,.✓:�� ..,Z.,,'.,,.",t;, -,:>a'rTG'a..- ",ti� "ss.to-2`*r8a�,,��.gw®n `�o$�,V.�� t, =",�.�.�-.m�+ eL,�,.»'Za$1?:'';r,t'.+'.a�.;.raYX'a�isi`b`,z.i;: �'i€w,"azsC�'3:`�'-� 42 Ss.m_4,.Low, v. r ax1 Aar,k'.ar.` ' ATTACHMENT #5 C E S"', POSEIDOM RESOUR PROM SED CE _ EA Dept, ("f -MA ER & 4# DEMUN_ !ON HUNTINGTON BEACH FACILITY The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach consists of the construction and operation of a 50-million gallons per day (MGD) seawater desalination facility. The desalination facility will take screened seawater and produce high-quality potable drinking water using a reverse osmosis desalination process. Source water for the facility will be taken from the discharge pipeline of the existing condenser cooling water circulation system at the AES Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS). The generating station is currently permitted to circulate up to 514 MGD of seawater for the four generation units' steam condensers. The desalination facility will use approximately 100 MGD of the cooling water after it has passed through the condensers and produce 50 MGD of high-quality potable drinking water for the use by residents and businesses in Orange County. The remaining 50 MGD of the desalination facility's seawater intake becomes concentrated seawater, which will be discharged back into HBGS's condenser cooling water system, downstream of the intake point, for dilution and discharge back into the ocean. However, if in the future, the HBGS were to cease the use of once-through cooling, or if the HBGS were to permanently alter its cooling water system's historical operations and reduce its long term seawater intake, the proposed seawater desalination facility would intake water directly from the Pacific Ocean via the existing HBGS intake pipe. In either case, and in order to protect the marine environment, 50 MGD of concentrated seawater would reenter the Pacific Ocean via the existing HBGS discharge pipe after blending with additional intake water to be used for dilution. Project The desalination facility will utilize approximately 13 acres. The facilities Facilities will be primarily single-story, Type-H light industrial steel buildings with decorative finish and a I 0-MGD water storage tank. The building will house the various equipment and processes of the desalination facility. The tank will store drinking water produced at the facility. The project will also include some cast-in-place concrete construction and welded metal storage tanks. A list of the facilities to be constructed along with. the size and type of construction for each is presented in Table 1. The proposed project layout and building elevations are shown in the preliminary site plans. Two on-site pipelines will be constructed to connect the desalination facility with HBGS's condenser cooling water system. A 72-inch diameter pipeline will be constructed for the seawater intake from HBGS's condenser cooling water system's discharge pipeline to the facility, and a 72-inch diameter pipeline will be constructed for the seawater concentrate discharge from the facility back to HBGS's condenser cooling water discharge pipeline. Both pipelines will be constructed entirely within the limits of the HBGS site. The project also includes the pipelines, connections and related infrastructure necessary to deliver water into the existing regional water -255- F,P�roposedseidon Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach Page 2 distribution system, two new underground pump stations to be constructed off-site, and modifications to an existing pump station. Seven to ten miles of 48-54 inch diameter potable water transmission main will be constructed from the project site to a point of connection with the existing OC-44 potable pipeline. The pipeline will be aligned along existing public rights-of-way through the cities of Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa. A booster pump station will be constructed near the existing Irvine Cross-Feeder located near the intersection of San Miguel Drive and Ford Road in Newport Beach. The second underground booster station will be constructed near the Coastal Junction located near the intersection of Alton Parkway and Creek Road in Irvine. In addition, the project will include modifications to an existing pump station located on Springdale Avenue and Skylab Road, in- Huntington Beach. The proposed alignment of the pipeline and the location of the new underground booster and existing pump stations are discussed in the EIR that is being prepared for this project. Other infrastructure construction will include small diameter pipelines for potable water service and sanitary sewer service to the facility. These pipelines will be routed through the project site and connected to local city services at the closest practical location. Parcel Map and The desalination facility will be constructed on a portion of the existing Subdivision of HBGS site and a proposed water tank-site that is owned by the City of Property Huntington Beach. The existing 3 parcels that currently comprise these sites will be subdivided into 4 parcels, as shown on the tentative parcel map. The proposed 10-MGD water storage tank will be constructed on Parcel 1, and the other desalination facility buildings will be constructed on Parcel 3. Hours of The plant will operate 24-hours per day, 7 days a week, and will have a total Operation and plant staff of 12 to 18 people. The number of staff on site will vary with the Staffing time of day and day of the week. Between 7:00 am and 5:00 pm Monday through Friday, 5 to 7 people will be on-site. During nights and weekends, 2 to 4 people will be on site. Population The proposed desalination facility will provide enough potable water for the Served consumptive use of approximately 100,000 families. Potable waterfront the facility may be distributed throughout Orange County including the Huntington Beach area. Surrounding The desalination facility will be constructed on a portion of the existing Land Uses HBGS site and a proposed water tank-site that is owned by the City of Huntington Beach. Three 40 ft by 200 ft diameter fuel oil tanks currently occupy the site on which the desalination facility will be built. These tanks will be demolished and the desalination facility and a new water storage tank will be constructed in their place. The project site and layout of the proposed facility is shown in the attached preliminary site plans. Project site is located in an industrial area. The land use north oj' the project site is industrial and commercial. Commercial businesses, including the Huntington Beach Maintenance Yard are located north of the HBGS site. Northeast of the project site is the ASCON-NEST landfill site. -256- Proposed Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach Page 3 Due east of the project--site is the existing Edison Pipeline and Terminal Company(EPTC) tank farm. South and southeast of the project site is the Talbert Marsh Wetlands area. Immediately west of the project is the existing Southern California Edison (SCE) transformer and switchyard and HBGS. Further west of the generating station site and west of Newland Street is a residential area, which includes a mobile home park and a RV park. Hazardous Pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and based on the Waste information that we received from the City of Huntington Beach Planning Substances Department, we certify that the project site is not located within a Hazardous Waste and Substance site. Poseidon Resources Corp. �257- Proposed Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach 'Fable 1 — Seawater Desalination acility in Hun tin ton Beach - Facilities Description Building/Structures/Tank Area Name s ft Height (ft) Type of Construction Notes RO Building 34,727 35'—0" Type II Houses RO Membrane Equipment and Pumps Pretreatment Filter Structure 59,550 28'—0" Cast-in-Place Concrete Open-air structure that houses gravity media filters similar to a conventional water treatment plant Administration Building 5,000 20'—0" Type II Multi-function building that houses administrative offices, maintenance shop,electrical room, lockers, control room, and a water quality laboratory Solids Handling Building 1,760 25'—0" Type II Houses belt filter presses and chemical feed equipment used to treat solids removed in the pretreatment process Electrical Building 4,840 35'—0" Type II Houses main plant transformer and switch gear Outdoor Electrical Equipment 23,541 12'-0" Concrete slab and fencing Includes open air structures that house : 1) Electrical Substation, 2) Switch Gear, 3)Transformers, and 4) Product Water Pumps Station Chemical Storage & Carbon 2,100 24'—0" Concrete slab and containment Houses bulk water treatment chemical tanks Dioxide Tanks curb,with steel, high density 0 polyethylene or fiberglass tanks and metal panel screen wall. ®® Post Treatment Tanks 5,250 27'—0" Steel tanks on concrete slab. Houses post treatment limestone tanks and equipment. Ammonia and Fluoride Tanks 558 12'—0" Concrete slab and containment Houses aqueous ammonia and fluoride storage tanks curb.High density polyethylene or fiberglass reinforced polyester tanks. Flush Tank 605 23'—0" Bolted Steel Process water storage tank Clean In Place Tank ----- ----- High density polyethylene or RO membrane clean in place tank. Located in RO building fiberglass reinforced polyester tank. Influent Pump Station 2,184 20'—0" Cast-In-Place Concrete slab Location of the influent pumps and piping.The pumps, piping, and other mechanical equipment are above grade Surge Tank 408 20'—0" Welded Steel Distribution system protection tank Product Water Pump Station 4,176 20'—0" Cast-In-Place Concrete slab. Location of the product water pumps.The pumps, piping and other mechanical equipment are above grade Product Water Storage Tank 49,481 30' Cast-In-Place Concrete 10-MG water storage tank. ATTACHMENT #6 Citv of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING www,huntingtonbeachca.gov PIanning Division Building Division 714.536.5271 714.536.5241 August 23, 2010 Josie McKinley Poseidon Resources Corp. 17011 Beach Blvd., Suite 900 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 SUBJECT: ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 (SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT) —21730 NEWLAND PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS Dear Applicant, In order to assist you with your development proposal, staff has reviewed the project and identified applicable city policies, standard plans, and development and use requirements, excerpted from the City of Huntington Beach Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Codes. This list is intended to help you through the permitting process and various stages of project implementation. It should be noted that this requirement list is in addition to any "conditions of approval" adopted by the City Council. Please note that if the design of your project or site conditions change, the list may also change. If you would like a clarification of any of these requirements, an explanation of the Huntington Beach Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Codes, or believe some of the items listed do not apply to your project, and/or you would like to discuss them in further detail, please contact me at RRamosCc)-surfcity-hb.org or 714-536-5624 and/or the respective source department (contact person below). Sincerely, f-�--5 Ricky Ramos Senior Planner Enclosure cc: Gerald Caraig, Planning and Building Department—714-374-1575 Darin Maresh, Fire Department—714-536-5531 Steve Bogart, Public Works—714-374-1692 Herb Fauland, Planning Manager Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager Jason Kelley, Senior Planner Property Owner Project File -260- • JJ HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT HUNTINGTON BEACH PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS DATE: August 23, 2010 PROJECT NAME: SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. 2010-37 AND 161 ENTITLEMENTS: ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130/DESIGN REVIEW NO. 10-004 (SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT) DATE OF PLANS: EPA-AUGUST 12, 2010/TPM -AUGUST 11, 2010 PROJECT LOCATION: 21730 NEWLAND PLAN REVIEWER: RICKY RAMOS, SENIOR PLANNER TELEPHONE/E-MAIL: 714-536-5624/RRAMOS@SURFCITY-HB.ORG PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 50 MGD SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT 'The following is a list of code requirements deemed applicable to the proposed project based on plans stated above. The list is intended to assist the applicant by identifying requirements which must be satisfied during the various stages of project permitting and implementation. A list of conditions of approval adopted by the City Council in conjunction with the requested entitlement(s), if any, will also be provided upon final project approval. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Plan Reviewer. 'TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130: 1. Prior to submittal of the final parcel map to the Public Works Department for processing and approval, final parcel map review fees shall be paid, pursuant to the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the City Council (City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department Fee Schedule). (HBZSO Section 254.16) 2. Prior to approval of final map, the subject property shall enter into irrevocable access easement(s), between the subject site and adjacent properties as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130. The location and width of the accessway shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Building Department and Public Works Department. The subject property owner shall be responsible for making necessary improvements to implement the access easements. The legal instrument shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department a minimum of 30 days prior to final map approval. The document shall be approved by the Planning and Building Department and the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder prior to final building permit approval. A copy of the recorded document shall be filed with the Planning and Building Department for inclusion in the entitlement file prior to final building permit -261- Page 2 of 5 approval. The recorded agreement shall remain in effect in perpetuity, except as modified or rescinded pursuant to the expressed written approval of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The Departments of Planning and Building, Public Works and Fire shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with all code requirements. The Planning and Building Director and Public Works Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to parcel map are proposed during the plan check process. Permits shall not be issued until the Planning and Building Director and Public Works Director have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the City Council may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001: 1. The site plans, floor plans, elevations, and landscaping plan approved by the City Council shall be the conceptually approved design with the following modifications. a. Parking lot striping and drive aisle widths shall comply with Chapter 231 of the HBZSO. b. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to, back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public right-of-ways. Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. c. All exterior mechanical equipment shall be screened from view on all sides. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be setback a minimum of 15 feet from the exterior edges of the building. Equipment to be screened includes, but is not limited to, heating, air conditioning, refrigeration equipment, plumbing lines, ductwork and transformers. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors. If screening is not designed specifically into the building, a rooftop mechanical equipment plan showing proposed screening must be submitted for review and approval with the application for building permit(s). d. Depict the location of all gas meters, water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units, mailboxes (as approved by the United States Postal Service), and similar items on the site plan and elevations. If located on a building, they shall be architecturally integrated with the design of the building, non-obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required setbacks. e. All parking area lighting shall be energy efficient and designed so as not to produce glare on adjacent residential properties. Security lighting shall be provided in areas accessible to the public during nighttime hours, and such lighting shall be on a time-clock or photo-sensor system. (HBZSO 231.18(C)) f. Bicycle parking facilities shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of HBZSO Section 231.20 (Bicycle Parking). g. Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130, Parcel 1 (tank site) shall provide at minimum six (6) percent of net site area as landscaping. Parcel 3 (desalination structures) shall provide at minimum (8) percent of net site area as landscaping. For Parcels 1 and 3 the applicant shall revise the landscaping plan to show compliance with the landscaping area requirements noted above. The landscaping plan shall be fully dimensioned so that city staff can verify the landscaping calculations provided by the applicant. For Parcels 2 and 4, the applicant/property owner shall provide no less than the parent parcel's existing landscaping percentage at the time of submittal of Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130. (HBZSO Chapter 232) -262- Page 3 of 5 h. Parking lot landscaping shall be provided pursuant to HBZSO Chapter 232. i. Include setbacks to all property lines after dedication on the site plan in compliance with the HBZSO. g. Demonstrate that the proposed eight foot high perimeter wall complies with all required visibility cutoff pursuant to HBZSO 230.88. 2.. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall follow all procedural requirements and regulations of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and any other local, state, or federal law regarding the removal and disposal of any hazardous material including asbestos, lead, and PCB's. These requirements include but are not limited to: survey, identification of removal methods, containment measures, use and treatment of water, proper truck hauling, disposal procedures, and proper notification to any and all involved agencies. b. Pursuant to the requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, an asbestos survey shall be-completed. The applicant shall complete all Notification requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. d. The City of Huntington Beach shall receive written verification from the South Coast Air Quality Management District that the Notification procedures have been completed. e. All asbestos shall be removed from all structures prior to demolition. 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed: Blockwall/fencing plans (including a site plan, section drawings and elevations, depicting the height and material of all freestanding walls and fences) consistent with the grading plan, shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning and Building Department. Double walls shall be prohibited. Prior to construction of any new property line walls or fences, a plan, approved by the owners of adjacent properties, and identifying the removal of any existing walls, shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department for review and approval. The plans shall identify proposed wall and fence materials, seep holes and drainage. 4.. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. One set of project plans, revised pursuant to Condition of Approval No. 1 and Code Requirement No. 1, and 8.5 inch by 11 inch colored renderings, elevations, and materials sample board shall be submitted for review, approval and inclusion in the entitlement file, to the Planning and Building Department. b. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval, code requirements identified herein and code requirements identified in separately transmitted memorandum from the Departments of Fire and Public Works and Building Division shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. c. A minimum of 14 days prior to submittal for building permits, an application for address assignment, along with the corresponding application processing fee and applicable plans (as specified in the address assignment application form), shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department. d. Contact the United States Postal Service for approval of mailbox location(s). . -263- Page 4 of 5 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. An interim parking and building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department to assure adequate parking and restroom facilities are available for employees, customers and contractors during the project's construction phase and that adjacent properties will not be impacted by their location. The plan shall also be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and Public Works Department. The applicant shall obtain any necessary encroachment permits from the Department of Public Works. b. A Mitigation Monitoring Fee for SEIR No. 10-001 shall be paid to the Planning and Building Department pursuant to the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the City Council (City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department Fee Schedule). c. All new commercial and industrial development and all new residential development not covered by Chapter 254 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, except for mobile home parks, shall pay a park fee, pursuant to the provisions of HBZSO Section 230.20— Payment of Park Fee. The fees shall be paid and calculated according to a schedule adopted by City Council resolution (City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department Fee Schedule). d. The final parcel map shall be recorded with the County of Orange. 6. During demolition, grading, site development, and/or construction, the project shall adhere to all Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code requirements including the Noise Ordinance. All activities including truck deliveries associated with construction, grading, remodeling, or repair shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Such activities are prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 7. The structure(s) cannot be occupied, the final building permit(s) cannot be approved, utilities cannot be released, the use shall not commence, and a Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until the following have been completed: a. All improvements must be completed in accordance with approved plans, except as provided for by conditions of approval. b. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning and Building Department. c. Compliance with all conditions of approval and code requirements specified herein shall be verified by the Planning and Building Department. d. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. e. A Certificate of Occupancy must be approved and issued by the Planning and Building Department. 8. The Development Services Departments (Planning and Building, Fire, and Public Works) shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable code requirements and conditions of approval. The Director of Planning and Building may approve minor amendments to plans and/or conditions of approval as appropriate based on changed circumstances, new information or other relevant factors. Any proposed plan/project revisions shall be called out on the plan sets submitted for building permits. Permits shall not be issued until the Development Services Departments have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's -264- Page 5 of 5 action. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the City Council may be required pursuant to the provisions of HBZSO Section 241.18. 9. The applicant and/or applicant's representative shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for review and approval. 10. The City Council reserves the right to revoke Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of the conditions of approval, Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 11. The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code, Planning and Building Department, Public Works Department, and Fire Department, as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 12. Construction shall be limited to Monday—Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 13.The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$50.00 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Oran- a and submitted to the Planning and Building Department within two (2) days of the City Council's approval of entitlements. 14.All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Building and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the City Council. 15. Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 and Entitlement Plan Amendments No. 10-001 which amends Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 shall not become effective until the ten working day appeal period has elapsed for the Coastal Development Permit. Because the project is in the appealable area of the coastal zone, there is a ten working day appeal period that commences when the California Coastal Commission receives the City's notification of final action. -265- From: Gerald Caraig Ext.: 1575 3/4/10 To: Ricky Ramos Project Location: 21730 Newland, Poseidon 50 MGD Water Desalination Plant BUILDING comments for CUP 02-04715P,& Jo-ev I 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. None 11. CODE ISSUES BASED ON PLANS & DRAWINGS SUBMITTED: 1. Project shall comply with the current state building codes adopted by the City at the time of permit application submittal. Currently they are 2007 California Building Code (CBC), 2007 California Mechanical Code, 2007 California Plumbing Code, 2007 California Electrical Code, 2007 California Energy Code and the Huntington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC). Compliance to all applicable state and local`aodes is required prior to issuance of building permit. 2. All buildings and non-building structures not used to produce, generate, or used in the transmission of water must have a building permit. (Muni Code 17.04.032) 3. The following code items require assessment by the applicant to facilitate project review at submittal, please note that this is not all inclusive and may be adjusted as more complete project documents are provided: a. Occupancy classification of all structures (CBC Chapter 3) b. Classification of Hazardous occupancies (CBC Section 307) c. Special detailed requirements of hazardous materials (CBC Section 414, 415) d. Allowable heights and areas of structures (CBC Chapter 5) e. Types of proposed construction (CBC Chapter 6) f. Fire resistance rated construction (CBC Chapter 7) g. Fire separation distances and its impact to construction rating (CBC Section 702) h. Required fire protection systems (CBC Chapter 9) i. Means of egress (CBC Chapter 10) j. Accessibility (CBC Chapter 1 1 B) o Path of travel from an accessible parking stall shown on the Admin Building Floor Plan cannot traverse behind parked cars other than their own (CBC Section 112913.3) k. Interior environment (CBC Chapter 12) I. Number of toilet facilities and fixture counts (CPC Chapter 4) m. Structural assessment of all proposed structures (CBC Volume 2, ASCE 7-05) o Vertical and lateral design (CBC Chapter 16, ASCE 7-05) o Seismic design provisions for non-building structures (ASCE 7-05 Chapter 15) It is encouraged that the applicant contact Building to go over code issues during the preliminary and design phase to facilitate and resolve code elements that may prove disadvantageous to the project. -266- The project is consistent with this policy because it does not propose any development in or adjacent to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitats, and provides for all required setbacks and buffers. h. Policy LU 7.1.1 (page II-LU-22): Accommodate existing uses and new development in accordance with the Land Use and Density Schedules. The project is consistent with this policy because it is consistent with the General Plan Land Use and Density Schedules. i. Policy LU 7.1.2 (page II-LU-22): Require that development be designed to account for the unique characteristics of project sites and objectives for community character and in accordance with the Development"Overlay" Schedule (Table LU-3) as appropriate. The project is consistent with this policy because it is proposed on a site that is already developed and is integrated-into the site. Pipelines are proposed to be routed irrexisting street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. j. Policy LU 7.1.5 (page II-LU-22): Accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that maintain the City's fiscal viability and integrity of environmental resources. The project is consistent with this policy because it proposes redevelopment on underutilized land for productive economic use. k. Policy LU 13.1.8 (page II-LU-43): Ensure that the City's public buildings, sites, and infrastructure improvements are designed to be compatible in scale, mass, character, and architecture with existing buildings and pertinent design characteristics prescribed by this General Plan for the district or neighborhood in which they are located, and work with non-City public agencies to encourage compliance. The project is consistent with this policy because the project will be an improvement by demolishing three 40 foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. 1. Policy UD 2.1.1 (Page 1I-UD-27): Require that new development be designed to consider coastal views in its massing, height, and site orientation. The project is consistent with this policy because the project plans include a number of measures to minimize adverse visual effects of the proposed facility. The facility would be comprised of relatively low profile buildings reaching approximately 35 feet above the existing grade, which would comply with applicable zoning code height restrictions of 50 feet. The overall appearance would be similar to a commercial office building. As part of the facility design, both vegetative and architectural screening has been added to ensure that exposed pipelines, tanks, and other utility-type equipment are screened from public view. The project would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect existing public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is EPA 10-001/TPM 10-130 -267- Item 5. m Page 15 visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. In addition, the project would replace three existing dilapidated fuel oil storage tanks with contemporary structures, which would improve the site's aesthetic character and result in a beneficial impact. in. Policy CE 7 (Page III-CE-26): Maintain and enhance the visual quality and scenic views along designated corridors. The project is consistent with this policy because there are limited views across the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) site due to the height of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks-proposed to be demolished. n. Policy ERC 4.1.5 (Page IV-ERC-25): Promote the preservation of public view corridors to the ocean and the waterfront through strict application of local ordinances, design guidelines and related planning efforts, including defined view corridors. The project is consistent with this policy because it would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. o. Policy AQ 1.8.2 (Page IV-AQ-15): Require installation of temporary construction facilities (such as wheel washers) and implementation of construction practices that minimize dirt and soil transfer onto public roadways. The project is consistent with this policy because it is subject to mitigation measures that control dispersal of soil as a result of construction activities. p. Policy EH 1.2.1 (Page V-EH-24): Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand ground shaking and liquefaction such as stated in the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all appropriate and applicable building standards related to ground shaking and liquefaction. q. Policy N 1.2.2 (Page V-N-6): Require new industrial and new commercial land uses or the major expansion of existing land uses to demonstrate that the new or expanded use would not be directly responsible for causing ambient noise levels to exceed an exterior Ldn of 70 dB(A) on areas containing "noise sensitive"land uses as depicted on Figure N-1. The project is consistent with this policy because it will be required to adhere to all applicable noise restrictions established by the City. r. Policy HM 1.1.4 (Page V-HM-7): Implement federal, state, and local regulations for the handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. -130 -268- Attachment No. i.s Item 5e - Page 16 The project is consistent with this policy because it includes appropriate and adequate controls for the handling, storage, and use of hazardous materials. The project will be an improvement to the area because it will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high-fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. There are limited views across the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) site due to the height-of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished. The project is required to provide a 10 foot (Edison) and 20 foot(Newland) landscape planter along the perimeter of the site to enhance the appearance of the area. These landscaping improvements are required to be consistent with the approvecflandscaping improvements for the rest of the HBGS property to the south for a cohesive appearance. The-proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses. However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL —ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10- 001 (AMENDING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 02-05): 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 to amend Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 approved by City Council in 2006 that allowed the construction and operation of a seawater desalination project by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project as proposed and modified by conditions of approval and code requirements, conforms to the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program by implementation of the following Coastal Element goals, objective, and policies: a. Policy C1.1.1 (p. IV-C-106): With the exception of hazardous industrial development, new development shall be encouraged to be located within, contiguous or in close proximity to, existing developed areas able to accommodate it or, where such areas are not able to accommodate it, in other areas with adequate public services, and where it will not have significant adverse effects, either individually or cumulatively, on coastal resources. The project is consistent with this policy because it is proposed on a site that is already developed. Pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. b. Policy C 1.2.1 - Accommodate existing uses and new development in accordance with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan and the Development and Density Schedule Table C-1 The project is consistent with this policy because it is consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan and Density Schedule. c. Policy C4.2.1 (p. IV-C-119): Ensure that the following minimum standards are met by new development in the Coastal Zone as feasible and appropriate: Preservation of public views to and EPA 10-001(TPM 10-130 -269- Item 5. a Page 17 from the bluffs, to the shoreline and ocean and to the wetlands; Adequate landscaping and vegetation; Evaluation of project design regarding visual impact and compatibility; and Incorporate landscaping to mask oil operations and major utilities, such as the electrical power plant on Pacific Coast Highway. The project is consistent with this policy because the project plans include a number of measures to minimize adverse visual effects of the proposed facility. The facility would be comprised of relatively low profile buildings reaching approximately 35 feet above the existing grade, which is below the 50-foot height limitation specified in the Zoning Code. The overall appearance would be similar to a commercial office building. As part of the facility design, both vegetative and architectural screening has been added to ensure that exposed pipelines, tanks, and other utility- type equipment are screened from public view. The project would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. d. Policy C4.7.5 (p. IV-C-122): Require the review of new and/or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The project is consistent with this policy because the project will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. Proposed pipeline facilities are located within the coastal zone; however consistent with the Local Coastal Program, the facilities would be located below grade to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. e. Policy C4.7.8-(p. IV-C-122): Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. The project is consistent with this policy because landscaping is proposed along the Edison and Newland project frontages and architectural screening is provided for proposed tanks and structures. £ Policy C4.7.9 (p. IV-C-122): Require the removal of non-productive oil production facilities and the restoration of the vacated site. The project will replace a dilapidated fuel oil storage tank and will restore the site, substantially improving the existing visual character of the site. g. Policy C6.1.1 (p. IV-C-124): Require that new development include mitigation measures to enhance water quality, if feasible; and, at a minimum, prevent the degradation of water quality of groundwater basins, wetlands, and surface water. 'tern 5. - Page 18-13o Attachment No. 1.7 -27Oe The project is consistent with this policy because it is subject to mitigation measures relating to water quality. h. Policy C6.1.13 (p. IV-C-127): Encourage research and feasibility studies regarding ocean water desalinization as an alternative source of potable water. Participate in regional studies and efforts where appropriate. The project does not conflict with this policy as it is a seawater desalination facility intended to provide an alternative source of potable water. i. Policy C6.1.19 (p. IV-C-128): Prior to approval of any new or expanded seawater pumping facilities, require the provision of maximum feasible mitigation measures to minimize damage to marine organisms due to entrainment in accordance with state and federal law. Application of CEQA significance thresholds results in a determination that the seawater desalination facility would not cause significant adverse impacts to marine life due to entrainment when it operates in either the co-located operating condition, or in the stand-alone operating condition. Sections 30230 and 30231 of the California Coastal Act (Coastal Act) require generally that marine resources be maintained, enhanced, and where feasible, restored. They also require that the marine environment be used in a manner that sustains biological productivity and maintains healthy populations of all marine species. It is not anticipated that the project would conflict with these policies. However, it is also noted that issuance of a CDP by the CCC will evaluate the project's consistency with these provisions of the Coastal Act, and that the CCC evaluation will include all necessary provisions, conditions or other requirements to ensure that consistency is achieved. j. Policy C 4.7 - Improve the appearance of visually degraded areas within the Coastal Zone. The project is consistent with this policy because it will be an improvement to the area by demolishing three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. The project is required to provide a 10 foot(Edison) and 20 foot(Newland) landscape planter along the perimeter of the site to enhance the appearance of the area. k. Policy C7.1.3 (p. IV-C-129): Development in areas adjacent to environmentally sensitive habitat areas and parks and recreation areas shall be sited and designed to prevent impacts which would significantly degrade those areas, and shall be compatible with the continuance of those habitat and recreation areas. The project is consistent with this policy because it includes significant setbacks from these areas and is further buffered by existing berms and proposed landscaping. Pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. EPA 10-001/TPM 10-130 -271- Item 5e - Page 19 1. Policy C7.1.4 (p. IV-C-130): Require that new development contiguous to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitat areas include buffer zones. Buffer zones-shall be a minimum-of one hundred feet setback from the landward edge of the wetland, with the exception of the following: A lesser buffer may be-permitted if existing development or site configurationprecludes a 100- foot buffer, or conversely, a greater buffer zone may be required if substantial development or significantly increased human impacts are anticipated. In either case, the following factors shall be considered when determining whether a lesser or wider buffer zone is warranted. Reduced buffer zone areas-shall be reviewed by the-Department of Fish and Game prior to implementation. (a) Biological significance of adjacent lands: The buffer should be sufficiently wide to protect the functional relationship between wetland and adjacent upland. (b) Sensitivity of species to disturbance: The buffer should be sufficiently wide to ensure that the most sensitive species will not be disturbed significantly by permitted development, based on habitat requirements of both resident and migratory species and the short and long term adaptability of various species to human disturbance. (c) Susceptibility of parcel to erosion: The buffer should be-sufficiently wide to allow for interception of any additional material eroded as a result of the proposed development based on soil and vegetative characteristics, slope and runoff characteristics, and impervious surface coverage. (d) Use of existing cultural features to located buffer zones: The buffer zone should be contiguous with the environmentally sensitive habitat area and make-use of existing features such as roads, dikes, irrigation canals, and flood control channels where feasible. The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all of the minimum setback requirements included in Policy C7.1.4. in. Policy C7.1.5 (p. IV-C-130): Notify county, state, and federal agencies having regulatory authority in wetlands and other environmentally sensitive habitats when development projects in and adjacent to such areas are submitted to the City. The implementation of any Habitat Conservation Plan shall require an amendment to the Local Coastal Program. Incidental take of sensitive habitat and/or species that occurs in the context of development must be consistent with this LCP. The project does not conflict with this policy because it does not propose any development in or adjacent to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitats, and would not result in the incidental take of sensitive habitats or species. n. Policy C 10.1.4 (p. IV-C-136): Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand ground shaking and liquefaction such as those stated in the Uniform Building Code. The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all appropriate and applicable building standards related to ground shaking and liquefaction The proposed desalination project is located within an unused fuel oil storage tank facility constructed in 1961 and formerly owned and operated by Southern California Edison. In addition to the proposed desalination facility site, the proposed project would also include several related off-site Item 50 _ Page 20130 _272_ Attachment No. 1.9 improvements, including tie-in pipelines between the existing HBGS condenser cooling water discharge system and the proposed desalination project, modifications to an existing pump station and up to approximately 4 miles of product water delivery pipelines within the city. The intake/discharge pipelines would be located entirely within the existing HBGS site. The majority of the product water delivery pipeline would be located within existing public streets, easements, or other rights-of-way in urban areas. As such, the proposed new development is located within existing developed areas. The proposed use is consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan designation of P (Public) for the site because it will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, and it is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities. The proposed use is compatible and consistent with the industrially designated properties immediately-surrounding the subject site and meets the requirements of the Coastal Element of the Land Use Plan and the Development and Density Schedule. The project will improve the appearance of the area by demolishing three existing unused 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and replacing them with lower profile, modern, and more attractive structures. The proposed structures vary in height from a maximum of 35 feet for the water tank to a minimum of 12 feet high for the ammonia tank. The proposed desalination project will not impact public views to the coast. There are limited views across the HBGS site due to the height of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures will have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished. A 10 foot and 20 foot planter along the lease area street frontage on Edison and Newland respectively will further improve the appearance of the project with attractive landscaping. In addition, the modifications to the existing and new pump stations, which are located behind an existing six foot wall,within an existing building, or below ground and the proposed pipeline alignment, which is situated below ground, will not impact public views or require landscaping to minimize visual impacts. As conditioned, the project is required to prepare a final landscaping plan along Edison Avenue for approval by the Design Review Board that is consistent in design, colors and materials with the landscaping for HBGS for a cohesive appearance. In addition, the conditions of approval for the project require compliance with landscaping requirements for the project site, and that landscaping along the Newland and Edison lease area street frontages include the densest type and number of trees to provide the most effective screening possible, which must be maintained to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. Landscaping within the eastern portion of the site will consist of native wetlands planting for compatibility with the wetlands to the southeast. In addition, the bottom portion of the structures will be hidden behind the existing berm along the perimeter. As noted above, the proposed structures are in substantial compliance with the Design Guidelines by employing variations in form, building details, colors, and materials that create visual interest, and the design is carried through all the structures including the architectural screen for the tanks to achieve a unified theme. The conditions of approval also require that utility meters be screened from public view and that backflow prevention devices be prohibited in the front yard setback and be screened from view. The EPA 10-001/TPM 10-130 -273- Item 5e - Page 21 we 111111111romm HUNTINGTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT FIH T PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE: MARCH 8, 2010 PROJECT NAME: POSEIDON SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 2010-1 PROJECT LOCATION: 21730 NEWLAND, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA PLANNER: RICKY RAMOS, ASSOCIATE PLANNER TELEPHONE/E-MAIL: (714)536-5624/rramos@surfcity-hb.org PLAN REVIEWER-FIRE: DARIN MARESH, FIRE DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST TELEPHONE/E-MAIL: (714) 536-5531/dmareshosurfcity-hb.org PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EPA- TO AMEND THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS FOR THE 50 MGD DESALINATION PROJECT BY REVISING THE LOCATION, SITE LAYOUT, FLOOR PLANS,AND ELEVATIONS. THE REVISED PLANS INCORPORATE THE CITY'S TANK SITE LOCATED NORTH OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LOCATION. DRB—TO REVIEW THE DESIGN, COLORS, AND MATERIALS FOR THE PROJECT. EIR—TO ANALYZE THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT. The following is a list of code requirements deemed applicable to the proposed project based on plans received and dated February 17, 2010. The list is intended to assist the applicant by identifying requirements which must be satisfied during the various stages of project permitting and implementation. A list of conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission in conjunction with the requested entitlement(s), if any, will also be provided upon final project approval. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Plan Reviewer- Fire: DARIN MARESH, FIRE DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, GRADING, SITE DEVELOPMENT, ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS, BUILDING PERMITS, AND/OR CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE REQUIRED: Environmental Environmental — Oil well on property. Methane Mitigation District Requirements. The proposed construction is within the City of Huntington Beach Methane Mitigation District. -274- Page 2 of 7 The following City Specifications are applicable and compliance needs to be referenced in the grading, building, and methane plans: City Specification#422, Oil Well Abandonment Permit Process. City Specification#429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. • City Specification#431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards. NOTE: An abandoned oil well is located on the proposed construction property. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 1. DOGGR "CONSTRUCTION SiTE REVIEW"is required. A California Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources (DOGGR— 714-816-6847), Site Plan Review is required for this project. (See included application). identify the well name and well APi number. Show the location of the abandoned oil well in question. Accurately locate with "x" and "y" parameters delineated. A completed DOGGR Site Plan Review must be on-file with the Fire Department prior to plan approval. Wells identified in the Site Review not meeting current DOGGR requirements may require re-abandonment. If required, the following permits shall be obtained and submitted: ® From the Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources (DOGGR—(714) 816-6847), provide a Permit to Conduct Well Operations for all on-site active/abandoned oil wells. ® Obtain a Huntington Beach Fire Department Permit to Abandon Od Well and follow the requirements of City Specification #422, Oil Well Abandonment Permit Process. Reference compliance with City Specification #422, Oil Well Abandonment Permit Process in the plan notes. (Location of the well is not certain, waiting on DOGGR Site Review to determine the requirements based on location to the project) DEPENDING ON THE LOCATION OF THE ABANDONED WELL(S) TO THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MAY BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 2. "OiL WELL HISTORY DISPOSITION REPORT' is required. A California licensed third- party petroleum engineer or geologist compiles a disposition report for submittal to the Fire Department— Development Section. (see City Specification #429, section 3.2) 3. "CITY CONSULTANT- OIL WELL HISTORY REVIEW' is required. The city consultant reviews the submitted OIL WELL HISTORY DISPOSITION REPORT for completeness, -275- Page 3 of 7 well integrity, and recommended safety measures. (see City Specification #429, section 3.3) 4. "SOIL TESTING"is required. Based on site characteristics, suspected soil contamination, proximity to a producing or abandoned oil well, Phase 1,11, or III Site Audit, soil testing is required. Soil testing plan must be approved by the Fire Department. (See City Specification #429, section 3.4 and City Specification #431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards). Note: Grading Plans must be approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of a Public Works grading permit. Standard Fire Department notes are required to be on the plans on oil industry impacted sites. Additional requirements will be necessary for the development of former oilfield property. Soil testing results must be submitted, and approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. "REMEDIATION ACTION PLAN" If contamination is identified, provide a Fire Department approved Remediation Action Plan (RAP) based on requirements found in Huntington Beach City Specification #431-92, Soil Cleanup Standard. Upon remediation action plan approval, a rough grading permit may be issued. 6. "METHANE SAFETY MEASURES"are required. City Specification #429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. Methane safety measures shall be detailed on a separate sheet titled "METHANE PLAN" and three copies submitted to the Fire Department Development Section for approval. Reference compliance with City Specification #429 in the plan notes. Discovery of additional soil contamination or underground pipelines, etc., must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly. Reference that all soils shall be in compliance with City Specification #431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards, in the plan notes. Fire Code Permit for Tank Removal/Installation. Installation and/or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks (UST) require the applicant to first obtain an approved Orange County Environmental Health Care UST permit/site plan. This approved plan must be presented in order to obtain the required Huntington Beach Fire Department Fire Code Permit Application to conduct installation and/or removal operations. (FD) Fire Apparatus Access Fire Access Roads shall be provided and maintained in compliance with City Specification # 401, Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access. Driving area shall be capable of supporting a fire apparatus (75,000 Ibs and 12,000 lb point load). Minimum fire access road width is twenty- four feet (24') wide, with thirteen feet six inches (13' 6") vertical clearance. Fire access roads -276- Page 4 of 7 fronting commercial buildings shall be a minimum width of twenty-six feet(26')wide, with thirteen feet six inches (13' 6") vertical clearance. For Fire Department approval, reference and demonstrate compliance with City Specification#401 Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access on the plans. (FD) Secured Vehicle Entries shalt utilize KNOO activated access switches (Knox switches for automated gates, Knox padlocks for manual gates), and comply with City Specification#403, Fire Access for Pedestrian or Vehicular Security Gates & Buildings. Reference compliance in the plan notes. (FD) Fire Hydrants and Water Systems Private Fire Hydrants are required. Hydrants must be portrayed on the site plan. Hydrants shall be installed and in service before combustible construction begins. Installation of hydrants and service mains shall meet NFPA 13 and 24, 2002 Edition, Huntington Beach Fire Code Appendix B and C, and City Specification#407 Fire Hydrant Installation Standards requirements. Private fire hydrants shall not be pressurized by Fire Department Connections to the sprinkler system. The system design shall ensure that recirculation of pressurized water from the hydrant, thru the FDC and back through the sprinkler system supply to the hydrant does not occur. Installation of the private fire service main, including fire department connections, shall meet NFPA 13 and 24, 2002 Edition requirements. Maximum allowed velocity of fire flow in supply piping is 12 fps. The maintenance of private fire hydrants is the responsibility of the owner or facility association. Shop drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. For Fire Department approval, portray the fire hydrants and reference compliance with City Specification#407 Fire Hydrant Installation Standards in the plan notes. (FD) O Private Fire Water Services - Separate plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department detailing the private fire water service. Plans shall detail the fire service piping, hydrants, fire department sprinkler system connections (FDC), post-indicating valves (PIV), fire pumps, water tanks, thrust-blocks, and other appropriate system details. The connection, valves and back-flow prevention (DDCA) should also be shown for reference. Fire Suppression Systems Fire Alarms Fire Alarm System is required. For Fire Department approval, shop drawings shall be submitted to the Fire Department as separate plans for permits and approval. For Fire Department approval, reference and demonstrate compliance with IBC 305.9 on the plans. A C- 10 electrical contractor, certified in fire alarm systems, must certify the system is operational annually. (FD) -277- Page 5 of 7 Fire Sprinklers NOTE: Significant changes to the Huntington Beach Fire Code have occurred as of January 1, 2008 as a result of the adoption of the International Fire and Building Codes by the State of California. An option may be available to the applicant to demise a portion of the structure with a rated fire barrier. Fire sprinklers will be required for fire areas 5000 square feet or greater or combined floor areas 10,000 square feet or greater per adopted Huntington Beach Fire Department amendments. (FD) Automatic Fire Sprinklers are required. NFPA13 Automatic fire sprinkler systems are required per Huntington Beach Fire Code for new buildings with "fire areas"5000 square feet. Separate plans (three sets) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for permits and approval. The system shall provide water flow, tamper and trouble alarms, manual pull stations, interior and exterior horns and strobes, and 24-hour central station monitoring. Automatic fire sprinkler systems must be maintained operational at all times, with maintenance inspections performed quarterly and the system serviced every five years by a state licensed C-16 Fire Protection Contractor. For Fire Department approval, reference that a fire sprinkler system will be installed in compliance with the Huntington Beach Fire Code, NFPA 13, and City Specification #420 -Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in the plan notes. NOTE: When buildings under construction are more than one (1) story in height and required to have automatic fire sprinklers, the fire sprinkler system shall be installed and operational to protect all floors lower than the floor currently under construction. Fire sprinkler systems for the current floor under construction shall be installed, in-service, inspected and approved prior to beginning construction on the next floor above. (FD) Fire Sprinkler Supply Fire Department Connections (FDC) to the automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be located to the front of the building, at least 25 feet from and no farther than 150 feet of a properly rated fire hydrant. (FD) Fire Protection Systems Fire Extinguishers shall be installed and located in all areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code standards found in City Specification #424. The minimum required dry chemical fire extinguisher size is 2A 10BC and shall be installed within 75 feet travel distance to all portions of the building. Extinguishers are required to be serviced or replaced annually. (FD) -278- Page 6 of 7 Fire Personnel Access Main Secured Building Entries shall utilize a KNOX@ Fire Department Access Key Box, installed and in compliance with City Specification#403, Fire Access for Pedestrian or Vehicular Security Gates & Buildings. Please contact the Huntington Beach Fire Department Administrative Office at(714) 536-5411 for information. Reference compliance with City Specification#403 - KNOX® Fire Department Access in the building plan notes. (FD) Addressing and Street Names Structure or Building Address Assignments. The Planning Department shall review and make address assignments. The individual dwelling units shall be identified with numbers per City Specification#409 Street Naming and Address Assignment Process. For Fire Department approval, reference compliance with City Specification#409 Street Naming and Address Assignment Process in the plan notes. (FD) GIS Mapping Information GIS Mapping Information shall be provided to the Fire Department in compliance with GIS Department CAD Submittal Guideline requirements. Minimum submittals shall include the following: ➢ Site plot plan showing the building footprint. ➢ Specify the type of use for the building ➢ Location of electrical, gas, water, sprinkler system shut-offs. ➢ Fire Sprinkler Connections (FDC) if any. ➢ Knox Access locations for doors, gates, and vehicle access. ➢ Street name and address. Final site plot plan shall be submitted in the following digital format and shall include the following: ➢ Submittal media shall be via CD rom to the Fire Department. ➢ Shall be in accordance with County of Orange Ordinance 3809. ➢ File format shall be in .shp, AutoCAD, AUTOCAD MAP (latest possible release ) drawing file - .DWG (preferred) or Drawing Interchange File - .DXF. ➢ Data should be in NAD83 State Plane, Zone 6, Feet Lambert Conformal Conic Projection. ➢ Separate drawing file for each individual sheet. In compliance with Huntington Beach Standard Sheets, drawing names, pen colors, and layering convention. and conform to City of Huntington Beach Specification #409 — Street Naming and Addressing. For specific GIS technical requirements, contact the Huntington Beach GIS Department at (714) 536-5574. -279- Page 7 of 7 For Fire Department approval, reference compliance with GIS Mapping Information in the building plan notes. (FD) Building Construction Exit Signs And Exit Path Markings will be provided in compliance with the Huntington Beach Fire Code and Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. Reference compliance in the plan notes. (FD) Egress 1/lumination/Emergency Exit Lighting with emergency back-up power is required. Provide means of egress illumination per HBFC 604.2.4 and UBC 1003.2.9. (FD) THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION: a. Fire/Emergency Access And Site Safety shall be maintained during project construction phases in compliance with HBFC Chapter 14, Fire Safety During Construction And Demolition. (FD) b. Fire/Emergency Access And Site Safety shall be maintained during project construction phases in compliance with City Specification #426, Fire Safety Requirements for Construction Sites. (FD) OTHER: a. Discovery of additional soil contamination or underground pipelines, etc., must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly in compliance with City Specification #431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards. (FD) b. Outside City Consultants The Fire Department review of this project and subsequent plans may require the use of City consultants. The Huntington Beach City Council approved fee schedule allows the Fire Department to recover consultant fees from the applicant, developer or other responsible party. (FD) Fire Department City Specifications may be obtained at: Huntington Beach Fire Department Administrative Office City Hall 2000 Main Street, 51h floor Huntington Beach, CA 92648 or through the City's website at www.surfcity-hb.org If you have any questions, please contact the Fire Prevention Division at (714) 536-5411. S:\Prevention\1-Development\1-Planning Department-Planning Applications,CUP's\2010 CUP's\Newland 21730(Poseidon Desalination)PA# 2010-1 03-08-10DM.doc -280- ATTACHMENT #-7 er OF A","'Olo, Ek "awxs a, lk AF ........... w„ 'K .rEf � . . «to 'UN"PI i�fi : All,,`N A -p- llll� xwt , r,gg, W-2 sK ,���� biers INN W, -W' 9� V N40A "NM AM 116 g,4 S le OF yft ia" `2 ... 77 A in- iv� "I .... ......-�A 0A 0 %v n,at omm. .�,<'`�-z::,'Y.' ,, .. '. „ a3�•y F,.� ?:,/1,a3 tG.' g4',s''�' ,w� R J, al" opw AN"W", M11"I M11"I ............. . My y- lot! Mkk M�111"""- r. Wm t n' U., vf"'O 'Et b id, I- ­Wy-st A W S", j e 10- was loop "WI 51 06, m 77 23,,7 rR, Ir Ay k W Xm- Sul� Rr. ol w k V ju ciw i n,�,gc,, ,, 44.UP , g -- n 'o, ti p 64M 'mg -W Al �mp Iff ref �77Ar of ,5 , MR, �W, M Of o tto, n's "U" el, evations,nm' gj "g< ,r> ram" y 3 Y 3 y„ ,, i' >r a �l ,ky r*�7+ a3 ,, ,az-- 'rl-__ L Pam ,e "x✓ ,, `z'�'f ' r r x ro. se'' , N b' G 1S„t Z� Q. .,t w +:M is r � ...... Me fir ;Z7fi \` i "MY, "e, �++► ti . «.r f .- <.�, -. �- „i•^,f--. v :, "eta.,:' .Ss -"s> :�., ,,,7 _ -�,� g.•• ,,.�:�,�,:,s' -' ,t ,„ ., �;r, ,... „•��''"'�, `'fie` Z' h,: -"-, Bw a ow Av r- .. 0 'o, .., 3' ?,..N:�,- M, ryK113 e <J "r, fr + I . e .C� S a , O'll"'ll all'�®R M ter ;'=^:�i ,�� :yen':", F. >rt >rZ` e� F � r :r lw .F'.d �. rt.rr- . >' v a N � � �o seuuterr`' as s ar�:d alone cil A M "a ytis K 7 ' 77' '"a, - , -- A, —' ti, c d. � t 'h. Va Ian s. yy: sri t� i K f h� h��r :c �aAt re.e 4=0 oot so a a s K � - :r <. „-. �.. ,..,.c. ,c.,,a$1�� .m,• .- ,y.-r �:,,;, " at A-1 n , c- 1 wf+„ A T 'Alpom ` ' \ K ' 3u " ih'c , ,, i .,, •'-"t�✓, ..,,,. ,Sri �4r „k. '"f'A::, ,, r,;'d.�' � .'�., ;:x-r"��';- °,ice-i�'?f,<•% .,�... r t� .,g.it 3 �N� Pal 7 ... ..g\t,,,i� ,M, r, ,. , , ., ,.7. •� �;,f: 't���"�\'M y /irc , rc w �...�;tic': ,, ..3' S ., "`t.�'� ''X''�'Y��- -�Y�`• 'P °s ,,•�.i�'� ''� r/ - ' r.- r R > " s ri<,,, 1, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2010-� 130 VW$ „s INTHF.CITY OFHUN'TINGTONSFACH,COUNT"YOFORANCF,STATFOFCAIIFOR3tiIA ' % :'',,'-<',•,r.'"i"/ '<,i ;;; .,,,;':`^"„<,'^�;''"i,..ls Al ." . .., - ;r.•�fr>:;:.v.u.rvre.�.:;cvrr:� �? r, -sa �`•, -�.. �' °,f?;?',t�"• :_w tns-r,wrv,.�wi,.ana,a.,f..nsza;'•,a nro,-. �,.,.m V S :ntiw%•� i'�«rt.� :.`W..:,�.°�.aeae±�m v.�',� y �.aM�....�,.p .^.... ¢ 'P� - = , Ys;'.,w �4• d �u yirft7;,- �,... ( t'< arK:.. ,� v�� � �»- cur, » OWN t;:;y,� ���•e '=:v.'-:`.?ham w.r.,.,. r ./�' ..�Aft „•,:' ,�"�,' j '�' f".`. ,:�°z•;; '..''S,•. 5.^r. Mo ro-.a ow ne ,��rm z,?i<ear y� i�x +�'_fi�t:i'e+ �d I{ t� F•Fiy„� ,^�°, �•'C" s.xy rs'k, <. ' ",h-, w�,�ev,:, v'�ai«,<:'::;F'iic,„,u;��',&i .n.n ra va.nvy,.x•wnwv.aar<.wnr � _�iP,%; "''_0—�-; :ua .,mA♦,`OJ�y."r+.'t yQ- y.#. �Q l.Qr rt�Lan '00 c � Js � , f Lm<3} WwJ k' " aim al l t eAM €„ € �•r i 3a€ t rc.. t r t r r < I Si. ✓e 1 } �M 5 y, mAMI > r „ fg y 0 f, E• rw'," �,, "� � � � `� ' ',n'�z.,'3,h ,'y.,rF,"`-��� ��#�",u. tjrrl,'"�`^^.�\<•��-"� i\ :E!' .Y ' r., �,,, ' ., .: °. ,,. ., ,. •�� a L..- ;..a---:, f''w�c„' .:'»�r' <z to y ,{i ,✓�,�'r` ( .,,,� >n :,,%;•aa" =�'•,�", ..., , .,�' ^fir; 'F•'.. 'O^ �.. n f `> �<»*.�',. ''�"" ^, c�3, .".w �"' � „, „, .''�.�"-,;'� Air F9 q�,l 1� � .<w•,•, �:¢. ,�+^`¢' � fi �ES +3' "o-fkk ,.. � - .pit q'` ,�'., a„ •, .,,,y"'M �,`>.' ws �� �<� r�;sue .;° ,. ,. , ,a"04 9°' •"�,:,',",�„ � `�,. ,,, wma t ';:il.�`�,•.• .. S �,_y �nTc•.��s\f <`X.,. mr mKxn sr+snex'in�rrt lip -WW- g� W, of r. tr 64 W" VIM 4 NMI- r: F5 t o . t 7 , p"AT 31 PEW A�n E lw � rn. toa otn. � �fr-�'<, PH,«� r. fR gr 16, w "M '�` ,a fl 1"�s z ,d:�x � to p h p, a "I S-So, wo e"Ml, � r -415 m - tiemo�ve a ,,s , nose,�,approve n Aw, ME OPON w� Vn f rz R, 4" Sri "s "Wo-O", t M v W 4, All r 5� ant A. / Y f Y a l .zC.:`d.•• ",�"> ':! ,,yam' l 'i e'.aa. � "a�„X„x .'i?i' S ",,V. ' �"""ay ✓nF s✓at �� _ ✓5'2'i _ Mak- ,aTOT z #.e; `1•?�fl,".'°,'�,^, f,c?F 1 ~c$ 1,Y WWI I'l ��� ' 1 MP, / F, ss`'s' S �. / �R� r ` S, qg 1.. r'? -.N,. >.,.. }, , F ''\`�.x.-,zx...< ...� _� .,,.. ,,'ems;.,' L? e:e, o�`.',h"`t.•<. ,« a q�� ` .W r r,fr v z v- t: 4H is<& 5 ., .. ,. x. ,. ." ,,; .'r.y'., f Y, ..�. ,, ry ..,,,,.E ,o.:. �4, r, , 5- �N ,y6! P a .fh`•k8 Y Y ^n . �V .3 3 t fl rf;, ■5 rtr a s t `� � d a�nR��r�_ � e � r c ,} � a fx'a�•r < , �:e f s, , ; kx 5 Y, ®_ Y �l and 4 rn nr� X x C F7� .......... 3 # ors e s to . oeAst7' < I: fire r xty I 1=� �r r > �- e e � Boa s ® c e . r3 ' ,.,,,<'" r.' ,M .>5'x•a'.b a. ,,::, .,'< ,.:;- r; ,'• -3x'�'t„a ".�{, ,�^�;� ..,<, w, �r`c,.",a ,,,ra, � r• .➢. ''is`:nw ''`s5^ .,„Y.«..�.q,.;� �.. ., .,' F t B V n �e C e S „ w as r h > > i 4•^ e5.. t nY ' :.r aw'F fin i F,>, A YPI" Isgw, Ot r� e e` C � r d b c ease ar �d�-5ecreat�or�.� � _f„ ,,n d, r ,x_r; �.,.. OPPI <�< `. �w �o fix•wj.,,r®, y, 4 3<� a e�-sad asubd�v��ded� �a�rcels suiztableMf �r � `r i� p plop "� z n»w ,rh` .,:pt Gx� `'ice., Y::1',. ,. t�dn,,.f•"', <, r e actInn r J F. �'�3 ?a. NOW 4 W, ' ,.;F: ' r 2 ':px aitFWt': �'�dc,'• < +G,rrb;•` eJSY: ' .,'�i 'R f'"_"^"^ I`+,,_,Won , Now, q-,, Ac -*� - N. 5 , ,,,'� �^q ., 'fir_ .,. ;� ?%' `�tn''tr ,`�� a y,5• '�a '�e .......... N-1 '-k All-11" �4,410,1"11 pW N* A Z"VY 4W MV, .NO wma; 77, 07(ml, Mwe Iwom w I. s v, a A.. M 7, s,r - p j ir tU -j a "KCA AWN g 'e8,, ag i I a 4usO,, 4 'e - 01T VI, 7�,�� N"mwih r ''trom',nn,'a -ww Wi M-W,A� rioe)d restaea-,n2:i,,.-,,tt--aw ` lu, Uuf ov wx. W, ­e, If"IF PI-1 ro act will �r re a earan 0 -4 IM ce4of ,ar en t-1 an L'7- d6s!di�z tn h- e'rl6j-�,Flaq J, -40.k BPI M. aaw All 601 FN oN J—n W-01, Og AM 441' A Pm Two �jj W mis mm", 49WI t R ^*rl WIR 41, 6 4 m�A I C71 tw� S RX" -J' o 00 A 75,1"'0 "s 7' n.............. APS a4K y V 00, v Mv WHO Alp W H. -A --w—SW 47 6", ...... Ar" W, al?4 --g r. In f. M 7� 4 OR m vn. S ........ ON Z11 qk, Huntington Beach Independent has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation in Huntington Beach and Orange County by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County,State of California,under date of Aug. 24, 1994,case A50479. PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) NOTI(EOF PUBII(HEARtNG BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE^ SS. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �T NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN.that on Monday, September 20, 2010 at 6:00 I, COUNTY OF ORANGE ) the in the City Council Chambers, earl Main Street, Huntington•Beach; I lJl�l 1 the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and ; zoning items: ❑ 1. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.,10-0%TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 (SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT):, Applicant: am the Citizen of the United States and a Poseidon Resources Corporation Request:,CDP:To permit the construction and operation of a'50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project ' resident of the County aforesaid; I am over on a +13 acre site. The 'project includes up to,+4 miles of water transmission lines (+1 mile in the Coastal Zone) in Huntington Beach to the age of eighteen years, and not a party connect to an existing regional transmission,system'in Costa Mesa and a tentative parcel map to facilitate the development of the project.Concurrent to or interested in the below entitled matter. with its consideration of Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 the City Council shall consider rescission of Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. ; am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON Should the City Council approve Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014, that approval.would replace the City Council's prior approval of Coastal BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of Development Permit No. 02-05. TPM: To subdivide three parcels totaling +19.5,-acres;into,four,parcels,to facilitate.the development of the project. general circulation, printed and published in Coastal Development.Permit No. 10-014 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 follow City Council action, on Subsequent Environmental Impact the City of Huntington Beach, County of Report(SEIR)No. 10-001 and Entitlement Plan;Amendment No.-10-001 and associated agreements. Should the City Council certify SEIR No. 10-001 Orange, State of California, and the and approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 and ,associated agreements for the subject project at the September 7, 2010 meeting, the attached Notice is a true and complete copy City Council shall consider ratifications of those actions at this meeting. Location: 21730 Newland (east side, south of Edison ,Avenue) Project as was printed and published on the Planner:Ricky Ramos,Senior Planner NOTICE'IS HEREBY GIVEN that Subsequent Environmental Impact Report following date(s): No. 10-001 for Item No. 1 was processed and completed in,accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that Item No. 1 would.have a significant environmental effect and, therefore, an ' environmental,impact'report is warranted. The Subsequent Environmental Impact Report,is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department,2000 Main,Street,and is'ayailable`for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning and Building Department, or by telephoning'(714)536-5271. NOTICE IS,HEREBY GIVEN that Item No'. 1 is,;located in the appealable jurisdiction ofthe Coastal Zone and includes 8oastal Development Permit September 9, 2010 No. d0-014 filed on"September 7, 2010 in conjunction with the above request. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Coastal Development Permit hearing consists'of'a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action. The'City Council's'action on Item No.-1 may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant.to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning,and Subdivision Ordinance ' and Section'13110 of the California Code'of.Regulations, or unless Title I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the Coastal missi n the California Administrative Code-is applicable. The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office, 200 Oceangate, 10th-Floor,Long Beach,CA 90802-4302,phone number:(562)590-5071. foregoing Is true and correct. ON,FILE: 'A copy of the proposed request is on file In the Planning and Building Department,2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by-the public. A copy'of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office'on Thursday September 16, 2010. ALL,INTERESTED'PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express Executed on September 9, 2010 opinions'or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined ' above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be at Costa Mesa, California limited to raising only those issues you or, someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to,the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department; at j 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications I to the City Clerk. Joan L.Flynn,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Sign re 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 I (714)53&5227 Ji J Published Huntington'Beach Independent September 9,2010 092-9 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, September 20, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑ 1. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 10-014/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 (SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT): Applicant: Poseidon Resources Corporation Request: CDP: To permit the construction and operation of a 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project on a +13 acre site. The project includes up to ±4 miles of water transmission lines (±1 mile in the Coastal Zone) in Huntington Beach to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa and a tentative parcel map to facilitate the development of the project. Concurrent with its consideration of Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 the City Council shall consider rescission of Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. Should the City Council approve Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014, that approval would replace the City Council's prior approval of Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. TPM: To subdivide three parcels totaling +19.5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project. Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 follow City Council action on Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 10-001 and Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 and associated agreements. Should the City Council certify SEIR No. 10-001 and approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 and associated agreements for the subject project at the September 7, 2010 meeting, the City Council shall consider ratifications of those actions at this meeting. Location: 21730 Newland (east side, south of Edison Avenue) Proiect Planner: Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001 for Item No. 1 was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that Item No. 1 would have a significant environmental effect and, therefore, an environmental impact report is warranted. The Subsequent Environmental Impact Report is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning and Building Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No. 1 is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 filed on September 7, 2010 in conjunction with the above request. CADocuments and Settings\esparzap\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Fi1es\Content.0ut1ook\EVZI IETS\092010(Poseidon) (3).doc NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action. The City Council's action on Item No. 1 may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations, or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office, 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802-4302, phone number: (562) 590-5071. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday September 16, 2010. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 CADocuments and Settings\esparzap\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Fi1es\Content.0ut1ook\EVZI IETS\092010(Poseidon) (3).doe 0918/0919®Aaany oaAs 91g11edwo3 ww 29 x ww 4Z lemol ap allanbi13 ?G I VC7 N 091.8/0915®tiaAy qpm a1411edwoa„8/9 Z x„L azls laq GAP I C�' -c91 a J-1 I 13 HB Chamber of Commerce Orange County Assoc_of Realtors Amigos De Bolsa Chica - President Dave Stefanides President 19891 Beach Blvd. Ste. 140 25552 La Paz Road P.O. Box 1563 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 4 G Suns ch Conununity Assoc. Huntington Beach Tomorrow Building Industry Assoc.of South Calif. Pat >Box ident President Attn:Elyse Sminada,Govt. Affairs Asst. PO PO Box 865 17744 Sky Park Circle,Suite 170 Sunset Beac07 15 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Irvine,CA 92614 v 8 SCAG TL Corral 100 Environmental Board Chair Richard Spicer �BeachNcl'646 Robert Smith 818 West 7th, 12th Floor 20292 E 21352 Yarmouth Lane Los Angeles, CA 90017 Huntington , Huntington Beach,CA 92646 11 12 Huntington Harbor POA Ma ' Environmental Rutan&Tucker,LLP P.O.Box 791 Attn: Shawn G—aftr,Senior Planner Jeffrey Oderman Sunset Beach,CA 90742 6701 Center Drive #900 611 Anton Blvd., Floor Los Angeles,CA 90 Costa Mesa,CA 9262 - 950 U3 14 15 Newland House Museum Historic Resources Board Chair C ncil on Aging Pres.,H.B. Historical Society Barbara Haynes 1706 a Ave. 19820 Beach Blvd. 19341 Worchester Lane Huntington Beach, 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 16 16 16 S cliff HOA cliff HOA eacliff HOA Je 1 o Roe Lo one 19391 Shady H Circle 19382 Surf Lane 19821 Ocean Circle Huntington Beach,CA 2648 Huntington Beach,C 92648 Huntington Beach, 92648 16 17 18 Johnson Kirsten Berg Pacific Coast AL haeological Society,Inc. 19671 Qm ay Lane 18870 Kithira Circle Attn:J thold Huntington Beach, 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 P.O.Box 1 Costa Mesa,CA 92 7 19 O.C.Ping.&Dev. Services Dept. O.C.Resources&Develop.Mgt.Dept City of Costa Mesa Director Bryan Speegle Planning Director P.O.Box 4048 P.O.Box 4048 P.O.Box 1200 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200 22 23 City of Fountain Valley City of Newport Beach City of Westminster Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director 10200 Slater Ave. P.O.Box 1768 8200 Westminster Blvd. Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Newport Beach,CA 92663-8915 Westminster,CA 92683 ! 25 City of Seal Beach �4 California Coastal Commission California Coastal Commission 25 Planning Director Theresa Henry South Coast Area Office 211 Eighth St. South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, loth Floor Seal Beach,CA 90740 200 Oceangate, loth Floor Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 1 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery05160/8160 J 0918/09[go, A]any oane algiledwoo ww Zg x ww 9Z lewaol ap attanbll3 Ig/091_gc Aaany ul!M algiiedwoa„819 Z x„G azlS la 26 27 28 Department of Transportation,Dist 12 Local Solid Waste Enf.Agy. Hunti on Beach Post Office Christopher Herre,Branch Chief O.C. Health Care Agency New Gro Coordinator 3337 Michelson Dr.,Suite 380 Director 6771 Warne ve. Irvine,CA 92612-1699 P.O. Box 355 Huntington Beach,CA 647 Santa Ana,CA 92702 C 31 Fountain Valley Elem. School Dist. HB City Elementary School Dist, HB City Elementary School Dist. U Marc Ecker Dr. Gary Rutherford,Super. David Perry 10055 Slater Avenue 20451 Craimer Lane 20451 Craimer Lane Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 31 33 Ocean View Elem. School Dist. Westminster School District 3.2, HB Union High School District Attn: Cindy Pulfer,Admin. Services Clark Hampton Stephen Ritter 17200 Pinehurst Lane 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 5832 Bolsa Avenue Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Westminster,CA 92683 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 34, 35 j 36 Cannery Hamilton Properties,LLC Goldenwest College OC County Harbors,Beach&Parks DeW Ascon Landfill Site clo Tamara Zeier Attn:Fred Owens P.O.Box 4048 One Pointe Drive, Suite 320 15744 Goldenwest St. Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Brea,CA 92821 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 37 38 38 Bella Terra Mall Country View Estates HOA Counq View Estates HOA Attn:Pa ers-Laude C omas Ge Chapman 7777 Edinger #300 6642 Trott ve 6742 Shir le Huntington Beach,CA 647 Huntington Beach,C 92648 Huntington Beach, 92648 39 39 40 Meadowlark Area M dowlark Area Hearthside Homes S Chery wring 6 Executive Circle, Suite_ 250 5161 Gelding ' c1e 16771 Rooseve are Irvine,CA 92614 Huntington Beach,CA--92649 Huntington Beach CA 649 d 41 41 Bolsa Chica Land Trust Bolsa Chica Land Trust OC Sanitation District 5200 Warner Avenue,Ste. 108 Evan Henry,President 10844 Ellis Avenue Huntington Beach,CA 92649 1812 Port Tiffin Place Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Newport Beach,CA 92660 42 42 ?2] AES Huntington Beach,LLC Richard Loy John Ely Eric Pendegra8,Plant Manager 9062 Kahului Drive 22102 Rockport Lane 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 43 44 45 HB Coastal Communities Assoc. Downtown Business Association Downto esidents Association David Guido Mr. St aniels Ms.Mane Germain 143 E.Meats Avenue 200 Main Stree 06 505 Alab Orange,CA 92865 Huntington Beach,CA 9 48 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 C 47 Gabrieleno/fongva Tribal Council Juaneno Band of Mission Indians AYSO Region 55 Chairperson Acjachemen Nation Co ' 'oner Russ Marlow PO Box 693 31411 La Matanza Street 18111 B ell Circle San Gabriel,CA 91778 San Juan Capistrano,CA 92675-2625 Huntington Beach, 92647 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery05160/8160 2 0918/09l.9@ AJany cane aqledwoo ww L9 x ww gZ lewaol ap allanbll3 09 18/09 1q®luany gllnn alglledwoo„g/g Z x,,L azls loqej 4 4 7 • , 47 AYSO Region 56 AYSO gion 117 AYSO egion 143 Da id Fike Commisione John Almanza Davi Kuiper 20091 T quil Lane 9049 field Ave. 16033 Bol Chica#104 Huntington each,CA 92646 Fountain V ey,CA 92708 P #163 Huntington E each,CA 92649 47 47 47 Huntington Bech Jr.All American Huntington Beach I lop Warner Football Gold Extreme F otball David Snyder Rick B r,President B Kudlack 5341 ranvill 20501 S burbia Lane 18432 odwin Lane Huntington Bech,CA 92649 Huntington ch,CA 92646 Huntington each,CA 92647 47 47 47 North Huntingt n Beach Futbol Club South Coast Ba ern Futbol Club Huntington Bea h Youth LaCrosse President hereen Walter Maris Pena Micha 1 Mutrie 1511 L eside Lane 22222 Eu yptus Lane 17761 -sty Lane Huntington each,CA 92648 Lake For CA 92630 Huntington B ch CA 92649 47 47 47 Oakview Re ewal Partnership Fountain Vallcf Pony Baseball Huntington Bea ch Girls Softball Jose odriguez Al tua Gerry Stee ,President 7850 Slat Ave,Space 59 14591 Y cca Circle 6172 S elly Dr. Huntington each,CA 92647 Huntington B ch,CA 92647 Huntington B ch,CA 92647 47 47 47 Huntington ley Little League Ocean Vie Little League District 62 C lenger Division Mic el Kircher Stephanie een,President Gail der 9767 wall Drive 18041 S ont Lane 17961 S a- Circle Huntington each CA 92646 Huntington ch,CA 92649 Huntington Be ch,CA 92647 47 47 47 Robinwood Little League Seaview. ittle League South Huntington Beach Girls Fast Pitch Kadiryr Beutel-Lui Micah I Mailman So all 6551 Rej wrick Circle P.O. lox 5305 Barry (burn Huntington each,CA 92647 Huntington I each,CA 92615 P.O.BC K 7332 Huntington Beach,CA 92615 47 48 C West Count) Family YMCA W Village HOA Coastkeepers Taira Hyuve on Hotsmgton 5200 Bl kpoot Road Gary Brown 19891 h Blvd #17 Wes er,CA 92683 3151 Airway Ave.Suite F-110 Huntington B ch,CA 92648 Costa Mesa,CA 92663 50 51 51 Briggs La Corporation Regional Enviro ental Officer for Calif US Navy Attn:Valeri A.Mosqueda Western Re on Environ Office She Donovan 99 East"C" treet,Suite 11 US 'r Force Community PI &Liaison Coordinator Upland, A 91796 333 Marke Street Suite 625 1220 c Highway San Franci ,CA 94105-2196 San Die g CA 92132-5190 51 51 51 Fort Western Regio Environmental Office Fort enter-Liggett Lt.Col.Pa D.Cramer Patrick Director Mr.Peter Rubin Director of Public MCI Training Directo of Public Works Cn US Marine rps Building 1164 Combat S Training Center Bo 555246 PO Box 05097 Camp pan�� CA 92055-5246 B 90 5th St Fort lrvvin A 92310 Parks RFTA Dublin,CA 94568 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 3 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery 05160/8160 Easy peel@ Labels ♦ Bend along line to o AVERY®5160® Use Avery Template 51600 1 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID: 376 APN: 149-014-04 ID: 454 APN: 149-022-22 ID: 232 APN: 149-231-03 Willard Tolles Gpc3 Huntington h Union HS District 10 Marquette Apt 218 1003 Vista Ridge Ct 10251 Yorktown Irvine,CA 92612-4205 Carson City, NV 89705-8044 Huntington Beach,CA 9 6-2926 ID: 262 APN: 114-481-13 ID: 529 APN: 114-160-81 ID: 452 APN: 149-021-07 Charles Lourtie Regents Of The University Of Calif Robert A&Catherine Gingras 10737 Crebs Ave 1111 Franklin St#6 1122 Eichhorn Dr Porter Ranch, CA 91326-2763 Oakland, CA 94607-5201 Erie, CO 80516-5403 ID: 318 APN: 114-481-06 ID: 16 APN: 148-041-06 ID: 440 APN: 149-022-08 Marina Valsamakis Francisca Salcido M And Cleta Keith 1130 Las Olas Ave 11461 S Church St 119 Cattle Trail Way Santa Barbara, CA 93109-2115 Orange, CA 92869-2601 Georgetown,TX 78633-4562 ID: 497 APN: 148-121-03 ID: 441 APN: 149-021-06 ID: 166 APN: 148-074-02 Tarnutzer Family Maria Lorente Judith Beauchamp 1320 Willow Pass Rd Ste 300 1505 Tahiti Ave 151 Kalmus Dr Ste 13150 Concord, CA 94520-5241 Laguna Beach,CA 92651-1946 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7955 ID: 433 APN: 149-024-24 ID: 45 APN: 148-044-09 ID: 501 APN: 148-121-18 Joan Klubnik Salvatore Danna Nuboard Recycling Inc 1602 E 4th St 1617 Via Arriba 1755 Park Ave Santa Ana, CA 92701-5118 Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274-1232 Laguna Beach, CA 92651-2219 ID: 104 APN: 148-082-29 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 55 APN: 148-044-19 Ali Malekzadeh Mills Land&Water Co Raymond And Jan Kang 19 Chatfield PI E 1920 Main St Ste 1070 2 Corte De Nubes Painted Post, NY 14870-9332 Irvine, CA 92614-7223 San Clemente, CA 92673-6912 ID: 127 APN: 148-086-33 ID: 226 APN: 148-012-11 ID: 449 APN: 149-012-09 Ronald Wilson Huntington ch Union HS District Michael And Lori Monaghan 20122 Glacier Cir 20451 Craimer Ln 20542 Paisley Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-4821 Huntington Beach,�CA96-5464 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6013 ID: 246 APN: 149-013-02 ID: 13 APN: 148-041-09 ID: 12 APN: 148-041-10 Sandra Hubrich Laura Gibson Michael And Susan Scott 20772 Skimmer Ln 21271 Lochlea Ln 21272 Banff Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6547 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6850 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6848 ID: 225 APN: 148-071-05 ID: 196 APN: 148-073-01 ID: 97 APN: 148-082-22 Joseph Gallo Kimberly Preston Paul Goodwin 21272 Breton Ln 21281 Breton Ln 21281 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7128 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7147 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7001 ID: 133 APN: 148-086-01 ID: 165 APN: 148-074-01 ID: 96 APN: 148-082-21 Scott And Deanna Johnston Allan And Susan Schaben Damon And Julie Smythe 21281 Seaforth Ln 21281 Yarmouth Ln 21282 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7038 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7055 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7011 ttiquettes faciles d peter ® Repliez h la hachure afin de www.averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 Sens de r8v�ler le rebord Pop-UpT'^ ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' I chargement J , Easy Peelw Labels i ♦ Bend along line to n �1 � ® 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edge TM 1 V � ID: 224 APN: 148-071-06 ID: 132 APN: 148-086-38 ID: 164 APN: 148-085-01 Ira Leibowitz Joseph Frolich John Galligher 21282 Breton Ln 21282 Sand Dollar Ln 21282 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7128 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7002 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7039 ID: 195 APN: 148-073-02 ID: 66 APN: 148-081-23 ID: 197 APN: 148-073-26 Elisa Wentworth Cheryl Toghia Michael Morton 21282 Yarmouth Ln 21291 Antigua Ln 21291 Breton Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7056 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7010 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7147 ID: 98 APN: 148-082-23 ID: 11 APN: 148-041-11 ID: 223 APN: 148-071-07 James Bailey David Madcich Dolores Lukes 21291 Sand Dollar Ln 21292 Banff Ln 21292 Breton Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7001 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7128 ID: 131 APN: 148-086-37 ID: 194 APN: 148-073-03 ID: 67 APN: 148-081-22 _ Jillian Fabian Don Albrecht Crawford Family 21292 Sand Dollar Ln 21292 Yarmouth Ln 21301 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7002 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7056 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 ID: 198 APN: 148-073-25 ID: 15 APN: 148-041-07 ID: 99 APN: 148-082-24 Jack Bartel Larry Rialubin Earl And Suzanne Soderstrorn 21301 Breton Ln 21301 Lochlea Ln 21301 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6850 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 ID: 135 APN: 148-086-03 ID: 167 APN: 148-074-03 ID: 94 APN: 148-082-19 William And Cheryl Tonic Peter And Riley Driscoll Gregory And Laura Carrow 21301 Seaforth Ln 21301 Yarmouth Ln 21302 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 ID: 10 APN: 148-041-12 'ID: 222 APN: 148-071-08 ID: 130 APN: 148-086-36 Robert And Cathy Lindsey Terry Lehigh Thomas Whitherby 21302 Banff Ln 21302 Breton Ln 21302 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 ID: 162 APN: 148-085-03 ID: 193 APN: 148-073-04 ID: 68 APN: 148-081-21 Judith Schroeder William Speicher Harry Bremmer 21302 Seaforth Ln 21302 Yarmouth Ln 21311 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 ID: 199 APN: 148-073-24 ID: 100 APN: 148-082-25 ID: 136 APN: 148-086-04 George Schweitzer Michael Supple Gary Bartz Jennifer L Markle 21311 Sand Dollar Ln 21311 Seaforth Ln 21311 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7129 ID: 168 APN: 148-074-04 ID: 93 APN: 148-082-18 ID: 9 APN: 148-041-13 J Kaa Starling Jon Rogan 21311 Yarmouth Ln 21312 Antigua Ln 21312 Banff Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6805 9tiquettes fables a paler s de Repliez a la hachure afin de; www.avery com ' Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 charnement reveler le rebord Pop-UpTM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' Al g j 1 Easy PeelQ9 Labels 1 ♦ ® Bend along line to o AVERV0 51600 Use Avery(D Template 51600 j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID: 221 APN: 148-071-09 ID: 129 APN: 148-086-35 ID: 192 APN: 148-073-05 Steven Rakhshani Jeanie Boynton Thomas And Nicole Fischer 21312 Breton Ln 21312 Sand Dollar Ln 21312 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7058 ID: 69 APN: 148-081-20 ID: 4 APN: 148-041-15 ID: 200 APN: 148-073-23 Davis Ly&Ha T Nguyen Clayton King Grace Mc Coy 21321 Antigua Ln 21321 Banff Ln 21321 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6804 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 ID: 17 APN: 148-041-05 ID: 101 APN: 148-082-26 ID: 137 APN: 148-086-05 Carol Parker Rudolph And Cynthia Friendt Donald And Susan Convery 21321 Lochlea Ln 21321 Sand Dollar Ln 21321 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6850 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7003 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 ID: 169 APN: 148-074-05 ID: 92 APN: 148-082-17 ID: 8 APN: 148-041-14 Scott Farrell Ahmet Aliyazicioglu Jeffrey And Tamara Olsen 21321 Yarmouth Ln 21322 Antigua Ln 21322 Banff Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6805 ID: 220 APN: 148-071-10 ID: 128 APN: 148-086-34 ID: 160 APN: 148-085-05 Grace Anderson Bruce Pulcini Kathleen And Peter Hamborg 21322 Breton Ln 21322 Sand Dollar Ln 21322 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7041 ID: 191 APN: 148-073-06 ID: 70 APN: 148-081-19 ID: 201 APN: 148-073-22 Donna Elliott Tull Taylor Jan And Barbara Varner 21322 Yarmouth Ln 21331 Antigua Ln 21331 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 ID: 102 APN: 148-082-27 ID: 138 APN: 148-086-06 ID: 170 APN: 148-074-06 Nancy Williams James Weepie Patrick And Louise Tierney 21331 Sand Dollar Ln 21331 Seaforth Ln 21331 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 ID: 91 APN: 148-082-16 ID: 219 APN: 148-071-11 ID: 159 APN: 148-085-06 Arthur And Cynthi Azpeitia James Larkin Cong Dinh&Yen Vu 21332 Antigua Ln 21332 Breton Ln 21332 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 ID: 190 APN: 148-073-07 ID: 202 APN: 148-073-21 ID: 103 APN: 148-082-28 David And Elena Hedlund Michael And Erin Karal Gary Smith 21332 Yarmouth Ln 21341 Breton Ln 21341 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 ID: 139 APN: 148-086-07 ID: 171 APN: 148-074-07 ID: 90 APN: 148-082-15 Lydia Fahilga S Smith&N Koch William Lamson 21341 Seaforth Ln 21341 Yarmouth Ln 21342 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Ittiquettes fables a peter I Sens de Repliez 6 la hachure a0n de www avery com Utilisez le gabarit AVERIf®5160® j chargement r6vdler le rebord Pop-UpTM j 1-800-GO-AVERY i Easy Peel®Labels A ® Bend along line to (� d4�I31P® 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM , V ID: 218 APN: 148-071-12 ID: 126 APN: 148-086-32 ID: 158 APN: 148-085-07 John Homan Yen-ning Wang Stephen Stagnaro 21342 Breton Ln 21342 Sand Dollar Ln 21342 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 ID: 72 APN: 148-081-17 ID: 203 APN: 148-073-20 ID: 140 APN: 148-086-08 Donald Russell Lourdes Biancardi Michael Tessier 21351 Antigua Ln 21351 Breton Ln 21351 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7040 ID: 172 APN: 148-074-08 ID: 89 APN: 148-082-14 ID: 217 APN: 148-071-13 Michael Struckhoff Jason Truong Tracy Trinest 21351 Yarmouth Ln 21352 Antigua Ln 21352 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 ID: 125 APN: 148-086-31 ID: 157 APN: 148-085-08 ID: 188 APN: 148-073-09 Joel And Shary Cass Dennis Kraus R Smith 21352 Sand Dollar Ln 21352 Seaforth Ln 21352 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 ID: 73 APN: 148-081-16 ID: 204 APN: 148-073-19 ID: 105 APN: 148-082-30 David Luther Dept Of Vets Affairs Of State Of CA Steven Wardle 21361 Antigua Ln 21361 Breton Ln 21361 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 ID: 141 APN: 148-086-09 ID: 173 APN: 148-074-09 ID: 88 APN: 148-082-13 Michael Kadau Michael Cook&Eileen M Duffy Darlene Hagan 21361 Seaforth Ln 21361 Yarmouth Ln 21362 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 ID: 216 APN: 148-071-14 ID: 124 APN: 148-086-30 ID: 156 APN: 148-085-09 Linda Tumquist Patricia Lalgana David Grover 21362 Breton Ln 21362 Sand Dollar Ln 21362 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 ID: 74 APN: 148-081-15 ID: 205 APN: 148-073-18 ID: 106 APN: 148-082-31 David And Patricia Bush Beverly Weisen Jerry Webb 21371 Antigua Ln 21371 Breton Ln 21371 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 ID: 142 APN: 148-086-10 ID: 174 APN: 148-074-10 ID: 215 APN: 148-071-15 Michael Ogan Amir Zaki Yong And Hyon Kim 21371 Seaforth Ln 21371 Yarmouth Ln 21372 Breton Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 ID: 123 APN: 148-086-29 ID: 155 APN: 148-085-10 ID: 186 APN: 148-073-11 Joseph Rubens&Connie Marten Todd And Alvena Johnston Ping Oey 21372 Sand Dollar Ln 21372 Seaforth Ln 21372 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 ttiquettes faciles 6 peler ; S Repliez a la hachure afin de; www.avery.com I Utilisez le abarit AVERY®51600 Sens de r6v6ler le rebord Pop-UP" ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 t chwraF+mnntt i Easy Peel®Labels ♦ Bend along line to ���$�� 5160® Use AveryO Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM At ID: 75 APN: 148-081-14 ID: 206 APN: 148-073-17 ID: 143 APN: 148-086-11 Steven Kennedy Lucia And Randy Fletcher Martha Baird 21381 Antigua Ln 21381 Breton Ln 21381 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 ID: 175 APN: 148-074-11 ID: 214 APN: 148-071-16 ID: 122 APN: 148-086-28 Stevenson Family Bart And Lisa Barrett Gordon And Patricia Akers 21381 Yarmouth Ln 21382 Breton Ln 21382 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 ID: 154 APN: 148-085-11 ID: 185 APN: 148-073-12 ID: 76 APN: 148-081-13 David Dominguez&Hiroe Tsukamoto James Griffith Kerry Shaw 21382 Seaforth Ln 21382 Yarmouth Ln 21391 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 ID: 207 APN: 148-073-16 ID: 176 APN: 148-074-12 ID: 213 APN: 148-071-17 Georgia Ziccardi Garen Hanlon Richard Jones 21391 Breton Ln 21391 Yarmouth Ln 21392 Breton Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 ID: 121 APN: 148-086-27 ID: 153 APN: 148-085-12 ID: 184 APN: 148-073-13 John Cleary Norman Ehrke Manuel Cadiz 21392 Sand Dollar Ln 21392 Seaforth Ln 21392 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 ID: 77 APN: 148-081-12 ID: 208 APN: 148-073-15 ID: 145 APN: 148-086-13 Keith Belew Ronald And Gloria Walter Lawrence And Stacy Beebe 21401 Antigua Ln 21401 Breton Ln 21401 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7014 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7131 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7042 ID: 212 APN: 148-071-18 ID: 152 APN: 148-085-13 ID: 183 APN: 148-073-14 Arnold Rittberg Morris And Terrie Spell Todd And Joelle Palombo 21402 Breton Ln 21402 Seaforth Ln 21402 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7132 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7043 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7060 ID: 78 APN: 148-081-11 ID: 146 APN: 148-086-14 ID: 79 APN: 148-081-10 Stanley And Lisa Bryson Steven Williams Walter Gunkel 21421 Antigua Ln 21421 Seaforth Ln 21431 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7014 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7042 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7014 ID: 147 APN: 148-086-15 ID: 80 APN: 148-081-09 ID: 148 APN: 148-086-16 Jerome And Jennifer Boroff Gay Boyer Dolores Ellison 21431 Seaforth Ln 21441 Antigua Ln 21441 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7042 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7014 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7042 ID: 483 APN: 148-011-07 ID: 316 APN: 114481-04 ID: 492 APN: 148-121-23 Mills Land &Water Co Reta Cagle Samir S Luke 21471 Newland St 21572 Oakbrook Or Current Resident Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 Mission Viejo,CA 92692-3014 21632 Newland St Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 ttiquettes faciles a peter ; Repliez a la hachure afin de I www.avery.com Utilisez le glabarit AVERY®51600 Sens de rev€ter le rebord Po U TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' e charaement Pop-Up 1 j Easy Peel®Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to Q AVERYS.51604D Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTm j ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 Terence Nelson Cynthia Kelber John Andrews Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 1 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 10 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 11 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 Christopher Chartier Jerry Vandermark Kelly Vandermark Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 11 a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 12 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 12a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 Deborah Sine Rick Sine Jordan Wallick Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 13 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 13a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 14 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 Colleen Apgar Crystal Butcher Edward Cipres Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 15 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 16a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 17 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 Elmer Smith Heather Newman Cheryl Dunlap Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 17a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 18 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 18a Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 Julie Grady Ronald Yocom Lester Elder Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 19 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 2 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 20a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7618 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 Roger Byler Mary Baretich Nancy Agostini Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 22a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 23a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 2a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7618 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7618 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7620 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 Deborah Bain John De Baun John Sturgeon Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 3 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 4 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 4a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 Laura Stenhouse Margaret Mcgregor John Leeman Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 5a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 6a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 8 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 245 APN: 149-013-01 Linda Leeman Ginya Paasch Clarence And June Ballenger Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21771 Kiowa Ln 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 8a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 9a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7833 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Etiquettes faciles d peler ® Repliez a la hachure afin de vuww.avery com Utilisez le abarit AVERY®5160QD Sens de reveler le rebord Po UpTm ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 � charaement p- � 1 Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ ® Bend alongtine to i Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper expose Pop- p EdgeTM a A!/EIf2Y® 5160® ID: 301 APN: 149-012-02 ID: 300 APN: 149-012-03 ID: 247 APN: 149-013-03 Donald Zaleski Alva And Magali Battenfield Louis Kastorff l belo Veoso 21772 Kiowa Ln Re 21801 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7834 21782 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7866 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7834 ID: 302 APN: 149-012-01 ID: 248 APN: 149-013-04 ID: 249 APN: 149-013-05 Shelly Gaertner Mary Surprenant Donald Holmes 21802 Kiowa Ln 21811 Kiowa Ln 21821 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7834 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7866 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7866 ID: 303 APN: 149-014-01 ID: 304 APN: 149-014-02 ID: 305 APN: 149-021-01 Michael And Jane Stracner Keith And Amy Seward Matthew And Angela Bellinger 21822 Kiowa Ln 21832 Kiowa Ln 21842 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7856 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7856 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7856 ID: 252 APN: 149-023-02 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Vinton Marriott Cynthia Crawford Joan Ferragano 21851 Kiowa Ln Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7866 21851 Newland St Spc 10 21851 Newland St Spc 101 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Richard Frazier Tanya Cantarella Jaclyn Willard Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 103 21851 Newland St Spc 105 21851 Newland St Spc 106 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Valerie Moeckel Debra Bartle Anthony Caputo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 110 21851 Newland St Spc 112 21851 Newland St Spc 113 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7629 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Michael Hiser Donald Moss Rae Berta Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 114 21851 Newland St Spc 115 21851 Newland St Spc 116 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7629 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Yoko Harada Arthur Guevara Kimberly Slaight Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 117 21851 Newland St Spc 118 21851 Newland St Spc 119 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Dawn Olmsted Merida Perez Marilyn Sammons Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 12 21851 Newland St Spc 120 21851 Newland St Spc 122 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 J Salisbury Rosario Roman Gloria Medrano Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 123 21851 Newland St Spc 125 21851 Newland St Spc 127 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 ttiquettes faciles 6 paler ; - Repliez A la hachure afin de www.avery.com {p Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51604D hSens de i reviler le rebord Po U TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' J caraement p' p i Easy Peel®Labels ♦ Bend along line to o Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Pa ����$�®5160® 1 per ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 - Christopher Tran Sandy Brown Ian Mccollum Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 128 21851 Newland St Spc 129 21851 Newland St Spc 130 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Suzi Holland Nora Vanderkallen Charles Lly Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 132 21851 Newland St Spc 133 21851 Newland St Spc 134 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Dona Patti Lora Walsh Patricia Porter Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 137 21851 Newland St Spc 138 21851 Newland St Spc 139 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 , ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Frances Avila Peter Nisson Patricia Osuna Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 14 21851 Newland St Spc 141 21851 Newland St Spc 142 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7630 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Tatum Fisher Amy Barr Victor Hupp Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 143 21851 Newland St Spc 145 21851 Newland St Spc 146 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Clarence Hallman Denise Marino Gilberto Tanguma Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 148 21851 Newland St Spc 149 21851 Newland St Spc 15 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7624 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Stuart Tedford Melanie Redd Christine Smith Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 150 21851 Newland St Spc 152 21851 Newland St Spc 153 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Susie Freestone Bruce Stafford Michael Gallegos Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 154 21851 Newland St Spc 155 21851 Newland St Spc 156 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Mollie Hill Christian Kraft Judy Frohock Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 158 21851 Newland St Spc 159 21851 Newland St Spc 160 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Andrew Chavez Amanda Boyum Andrew Mccaffrey Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 161 21851 Newland St Spc 162 21851 Newland St Spc 163 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 k1cluettes faciles a peter ; A Repliez 6 la hachure afin de; www.avery com �+ Utilisez le gabarit AVERY19 5160 Sens de reveler le rebord Po U *M 1-800-GO-AVERY i 1 chargement Pop-Up Easy Peel®Labels ♦ Bend along line to o A�O��Yp 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edge TM � � ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Tammy Lough Pamela Saunders Timothy Kuroishi Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 164 21851 Newland St Spc 165 21851 Newland St Spc 166 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Frederick Martin Debra Ladouceur Jack Hastings Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 167 21851 Newland St Spc 168 21851 Newland St Spc 170 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Rolland Blackiston Steven Vaughan Annie Wiggins Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 171 21851 Newland St Spc 172 21851 Newland St Spc 173 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Kimberly Beebe Christopher Ablin Carissa Bisnar Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 175 21851 Newland St Spc 176 21851 Newland St Spc 177 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7632 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Jill Cheyne-roy Georgine Condon Donna Beasley Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 18 21851 Newland St Spc 180 21851 Newland St Spc 181 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7624 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7632 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Dale Ackerman William Moore Danielle Defeo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 182 21851 Newland St Spc 183 21851 Newland St Spc 184 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Arlene Baker James Buck Jorge Festini Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 185 21851 Newland St Spc 186 21851 Newland St Spc 187 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Russell Christensen Thomas Sutley Shelley Brower Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 188 21851 Newland St Spc 189 21851 Newland St Spc 19 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7625 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 David Martorelli David Post Sylvia Davanzo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 190 21851 Newland St Spc 191 21851 Newland St Spc 192 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Errol Lord Scott Wilson Chris Roth Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 193 21851 Newland St Spc 194 21851 Newland St Spc 196 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 h1quettes faciles A peler ; ® Repliez i31a hadiure afro de; vuwvv avery com �2, Utilisez le gabarit AVERY�5160® Sens de r6vgier le rebord Po U T" ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' A chamement p- P � i Easy Peel®Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to Q AVERV0 51600 i Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 - Erik Elstad Dolores Anderson Dan Wicks Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 197 21851 Newland St Spc 198 21851 Newland St Spc 199 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Jakub Rozga George Barker Juanita Wood Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 1 a 21851 Newland St Spc 1 b 21851 Newland St Spc 2 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7642 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7642 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Ikuko Miyagi William Raymond Teresa Greenfield Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 20 21851 Newland St Spc 201 21851 Newland St Spc 202 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7625 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Sandra Epstein Timothy Fitzpatrick Judith Beteag Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 203 21851 Newland St Spc 204 21851 Newland St Spc 205 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Rita Sadler John Trant Janet Boyle Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 206 21851 Newland St Spc 207 21851 Newland St Spc 208 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Diane Coulter Sharlene Boatright Howard Freedman Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 21 21851 Newland St Spc 210 21851 Newland St Spc 211 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7625 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Mark Molloy Eric Daniel Teri Harkins Rd Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 212 21851 Newland St Spc 215 21851 Newland St Spc 217 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 John Paul Laurie Allen Lori Montez Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 218 21851 Newland St Spc 219 21851 Newland St Spc 220 . Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Francis Brannen Charles Pena Bob Smith Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 221 21851 Newland St Spc 222 21851 Newland St Spc 223 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Barbara Liscotti Johanna Meier Suzanne Sephton Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 225 21851 Newland St Spc 226 21851 Newland St Spc 228 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 ttiquettes faciles h paler ARepliez A la hachure afin de www.avery.com ; Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 j chSens dent r6vEler le rebord Pop-UpTm j 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peefw Labels i ♦ IIIIIIIIIIIIIINBend along line to i n AVERY® 51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM V j ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Mamie Duenas Elly Abajian Lee Gillespie Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 229 21851 Newland St Spc 23 21851 Newland St Spc 234 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7625 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Jeanne Ferrara John Wendell Alice Mishica Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 235 21851 Newland St Spc 237 21851 Newland St Spc 24 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7626 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Barbara Nelson Scott Sprick Mary Wright Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 240 21851 Newland St Spc 241 21851 Newland St Spc 242 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7636 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 James Campbell Laurie Church Jamie Haig Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 244 21851 Newland St Spc 246 21851 Newland St Spc 247 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7636 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Doug Klaas Christopher Nielsen Kurt Hagan Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 248 21851 Newland St Spc 249 21851 Newland St Spc 25 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7626 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Kari Lavalley Maria Young Pamela Nelson Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 250 21851 Newland St Spc 252 21851 Newland St Spc 254 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Abbey Marks John Merrill Steven Woodward Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 255 21851 Newland St Spc 256 21851 Newland St Spc 257 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Mark Branco Henry Cargill Marjorie Ballinger Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 259 21851 Newland St Spc 26 21851 Newland St Spc 260 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7626 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Lawrence Nye Linda Brice Martha Sullivan Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 261 21851 Newland St Spc 262 21851 Newland St Spc 263 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Sabrina Haycock Sam Salib Lucas Wimer Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 268 21851 Newland St Spc 269 21851 Newland St Spc 27 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7627 f=tiquettes faciles A paler - Repliez a la hachure afin de; vvwWavery com Lr Utilisez le abarit AVERY®51600 Sens de rLsv6ler le rebord Po U TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 chargement p- P 1 t Easy Peel Labels A ® Bend along line to D d�►���® 5160® Use Avery Template 51600 j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Krystalyn Franks Thomas Archer Thomas Pelk Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident - 21851 Newland St Spc 271 21851 Newland St Spc 274 21851 Newland St Spc 275 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 ID: 470 APN; 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Larry Parilla Teresa Gilliland Nanette Barress Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 276 21851 Newland St Spc 277 21851 Newland St Spc 278 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Debra Mendenhall Edwin Callaway Audrey Maratta Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 279 21851 Newland St Spc 28 21851 Newland St Spc 280 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7627 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 James Bibb Paul Sulzby Stephen Supola Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 281 21851 Newland St Spc 284 21851 Newland St Spc 287 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Cheryl Walsh Steven Vanover Julie Reyes Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 288 21851 Newland St Spc 289 21851 Newland St Spc 29 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7627 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Vickie Flanagan Michael Sheridan Jeremy Loo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 291 21851 Newland St Spc 292 21851 Newland St Spc 296 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7639 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Barbara Banuelos Susan Robins James Pittman Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 297 21851 Newland St Spc 298 21851 Newland St Spc 299 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Karen Sampson Kyle Brown Charles Cook Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 30 21851 Newland St Spc 301 21851 Newland St Spc 302 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Carolyn Dick Carol Leblanc Jeffrey Klauza Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 305 21851 Newland St Spc 31 21851 Newland St Spc 312 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7641 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Craig Eggers June Moore Pamala Clifford Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 315 21851 Newland St Spc 32 21851 Newland St Spc 33 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Etiquettes faciles i peler ; Repliez a la hachure afro de; www.averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5160® Sens de afro le rebord Po U TM i 1-800-GO-AVERY i 1 chargement p' p Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to iA��(a�® 51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper �� expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Franklin Harding Wayne Estabrook Barbara Howard Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 34 21851 Newland St Spc 35 21851 Newland St Spc 36 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Henry Field Rebecca Crouse Vicki Schlom Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 37 21851 Newland St Spc 38 21851 Newland St Spc 39 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Kathleen Millar Jonathan Tickenoff Stacey Lavoie Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 4 21851 Newland St Spc 40 21851 Newland St Spc 45 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7622 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 James Bertoni Tommasina Cinito Jan Torrence Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 47 21851 Newland St Spc 48 21851 Newland St Spc 49 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Anne De Vusser Mary Massoth Jennian Beaver Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 50 21851 Newland St Spc 51 21851 Newland St Spc 52 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Louis Amerman Bruce Yelverton Vincent Hannan Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 53 21851 Newland St Spc 55 21851 Newland St Spc 56 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Mary Grisham D Draghi Scott Mccall Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 60 21851 Newland St Spc 61 21851 Newland St Spc 62 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Bradley Likich Micahel Slaton Rodney Hansen Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 63 21851 Newland St Spc 64 21851 Newland St Spc 65 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Michelle Bibb Robert Johnson Vincent Vancura Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 66 21851 Newland St Spc 67 21851 Newland St Spc 68 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Max Stimac James Meyling Linda Umbaugh Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 69 21851 Newland St Spc 7 21851 Newland St Spc 70 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Ittiquettes faciles$peler ; A Repliez i la hachure a6n de; www.averycorn I Lp Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 Sens de rtweler le rebord Po U *�"1 1-800-GO-AVERY chargement Pop-Up Easy Peele'Labels A ® Bend along line to ANMRYO 51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM V ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 - Janet Vincent William Trover Kevin Gassert Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident - 21851 Newland St Spc 73 21851 Newland St Spc 74 21851 Newland St Spc 75 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Jan Deady John Mcentire Jana Reeser Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 76 21851 Newland St Spc 77 21851 Newland St Spc 79 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Robert Lanshaw Kathie Hoffman Gary Herkner Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 81 21851 Newland St Spc 82 21851 Newland St Spc 83 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Michelle Tallman Michael Zappen Cynthia Montgomery Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 84 21851 Newland St Spc 85 21851 Newland St Spc 86 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Sandra Snell Shylo Hight Bobbie Gardner Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 87 21851 Newland St Spc 88 21851 Newland St Spc 89 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Melva Burton Dallas Herrold Paul Morrow Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 90 21851 Newland St Spc 91 21851 Newland St Spc 92 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Mary Moses Laura Brewster Alexander Rocco Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 94 21851 Newland St Spc 95 21851 Newland St Spc 96 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 306 APN: 149-022-03 ID: 254 APN: 149-023-04 Richard Duffy David Nelson Richard And Cathy Svoboda Or Current Resident 21862 Kiowa Ln 21871 Kiowa Ln 21851 Newland St Spc 98 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7855 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7835 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID: 362 APN: 149-011-05 ID: 307 APN: 149-022-02 ID: 255 APN: 149-023-05 Stanley Chen Maria Priddy Daniel Malloy 21872 Harborbreeze Ln 21872 Kiowa Ln 21881 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8253 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7855 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7835 ID: 308 APN: 149-022-01 ID: 95 APN: 148-082-20 ID: 256 APN: 149-023-06 Frances Martin Robert Browning Michele Erwin 21882 Kiowa Ln 21882 Oceanview Ln 21891 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7855 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8217 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7835 Etiquettes faciles a peler ® Repliez la hachure afin de; vuww.averycom 1 Utilises le abarit AVERYO 51600 Sens de rev6ier le rebord Po U TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 , chargement p p 1 Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to A9/EIRY6 51600 Use AveryO Template 51600 j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM 1 ID: 485 APN: 114-150-81 ID: 488 APN: 114-160-86 ID: 257 APN: 149-023-07 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Teresa J Lee 21900 Pacific Coast Hwy 21900 Pacific Coast Hwy 21901 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7835 ID: 149 APN: 148-081-01 ID: 309 APN: 149-024-03 ID: 258 APN: 149-023-08 Teresa Lee Brent And Janet Kooiman Kenneth Forrister 21901 Kiowa Ln 21902 Kiowa Ln Elizabeth C Gillett Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7836 Huntington ton B Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7837 ID: 310 APN: 149-024-02 ID: 259 APN: 149-023-09 ID: 311 APN: 149-024-01 Kim Kellner Florence Howard Alan Bramlett 21912 Kiowa Ln 21931 Kiowa Ln 21932 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7836 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7836 ID: 260 APN: 149-023-10 ID: 261 APN: 149-023-11 ID: 330 APN: 114-482-01 Fares And Nabila Jahshan Donald Mckinney Mary Arnold 21941 Kiowa Ln 21961 Kiowa Ln 22002 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID: 276 APN: 114-481-12 ID: 264 APN: 114-481-15 ID: 393 APN: 114-482-17 John Graves&Kay Melinda Judy Lenihan Michael And Donna Tryon 22012 Hula Cir 22021 Hula Cir 22021 Surfrider Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 ID: 314 APN: 114-481-02 ID: 275 APN: 114-481-11 ID: 329 APN: 114-482-02 Lisa Howell Kathleen Mooney Oanh Mai&Thao Ho 22021 Susan Ln 22022 Hula Cir 22022 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8305 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID: 288 APN: 149-031-07 ID: 392 APN: 114-482-16 ID: 328 APN: 114-482-03 D And K Coffman David Cragun All Gabrion 22031 Jonesport Ln 22031 Surfrider Ln Julie Nevins-gabrion Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8422 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8344 22032 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID: 391 APN: 114-482-15 ID: 274 APN: 114-481-10 ID: 327 APN: 114-482-04 Richard Mast Dorothy Riley Oliver Thayer 22041 Surfrider Ln 22042 Hula Cir 22042 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID: 266 APN: 114-481-17 ID: 390 APN: 114-482-14 ID: 273 APN: 114-481-09 Israel Reyngold Thomas And Catherine Mortimer John And Dana Ryan 22051 Hula Cir 22051 Surfrider Ln 22052 Hula Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 ID: 326 APN: 114-482-05 ID: 389 APN: 114-482-13 ID: 317 APN: 114-481-05 Gale Hillis&Virginia A Hills Jeane Fleming Raymond And Charlene Cole 22052 Susan Ln 22061 Surfrider Ln 22061 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8305 ttiquettes faciles h peter ; Repliez i la hachure afin de; J chargement www avery com tb Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5160® Sens de reviler le rebord Pop-UpTM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 1 i Easy Peelg9 Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to j a ����® 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 , Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID: 267 APN: 114-481-18 ID: 272 APN: 114-481-08 ID: 388 APN: 114-482-12 Kenneth Kimball Ellen White Susan Anderson 22071 Hula Cir 22072 Hula Cir 22081 Surfrider Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8344 ID: 319 APN: 114-481-07 ID: 523 APN: 114-150-78 ID: 189 APN: 148-073-08 Leonard And Rebecca Lopez Cannery Hamilton Properties Llc David Sutton 22091 Susan Ln 2222 Martin Ste 255 245 Clipper Way Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8305 Irvine, CA 92612-1481 Seal Beach, CA 90740-5955 ID: 500 APN: 148-121-19 ID: 163 APN: 148-085-02 ID: 236 APN: 149-031-24 H&Z Investments Llc Erika Nollau Warren Biscailuz Saghafi Hamid 2620 Cody Cir 28237 Sw Wagner St 25352 Hillary Ln Las Cruces, NM 88011-9079 Wilsonville,OR 97070-6784 Laguna Hills,CA 92653-5217 ID: 522 APN: 114-150-28 ID: 459 APN: 114-150-62 ID: 387 APN: 114-482-11 Orange County Flood Control Dist State Of California Parks&Rec Robert Merritt 300 N Flower St#6 3030 Avenida Del Presidente 31886 Via Pato Santa Ana, CA 92703-5000 San Clemente,CA 92672-4433 Trabuco Canyon,CA 92679-4129 ID: 369 APN: 149-041-11 ID: 33 APN: 148-044-05 ID: 65 APN: 148-081-24 Kerry Roth Alejandro Arredondo Laverne Spence 32031 Via Flores 3218 S Deegan Dr 3300 Irvine Ave Ste 270 San Juan Capistrano,CA 92675-3808 Santa Ana, CA 92704-6615 Newport Beach,CA 92660-3111 ID: 464 APN: 114-150-58 ID: 21 APN: 148-044-01 ID: 313 APN: 114-481-01 State Of California Dept Of Tran William And Alicia Almeida Terence Boston 3337 Michelson Dr Ste 380 3375 Marigold Cir 3501 Jamboree Rd#301 Irvine,CA 92612-8894 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1724 Newport Beach, CA 92660-2939 ID: 251 APN: 149-023-01 ID: 187 APN: 148-073-10 ID: 177 APN: 148-074-13 Lee Hupp Wesley Smith Barbara Hennesey 35225 Linda Rosea Rd 3530 Damien Ave Spc 7 414 El Modena Ave Temecula, CA 92592-9531 La Verne,CA 91750-3207 Newport Beach, CA 92663-5113 ID: 161 APN: 148-085-04 ID: 253 APN: 149-023-03 ID: 382 APN: 149-023-16 Raymond And Carol Millard Lilly Wittman Amber Wagner 42303 Highway 200 4651 W Crestview Cir 5526 W Dorothea Ave Hope, ID 83836-9785 Tucson,AZ 85745-9207 Visalia, CA 93277-6414 ID: 144 APN: 148-086-12 ID: 533 APN: 148-041-51 ID: 527 APN: 114-150-36 Joseph Buszek Bonanni Properties&D S Products Pacific Terminals Lic 5607 Chadwick Rd 5622 Research Dr 5900 Cherry Ave Mission,KS 66205-2628 Huntington Beach, CA 92649-1633 Long Beach, CA 90805-4408 ID: 526 APN: 114-150-75 ID: 29 APN: 148-043-43 ID: 498 APN: 148-121-21 Cannery Hamilton Properties Llc David Oakley Arthur Brimlow 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd 6251 Moonfield Dr 652 E Culver Ave San Ramon,CA 94583-2324 Huntington Beach,CA 92648-1039 Orange, CA 92866-2054 ttiquettes faciles a peter ARepliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com ,o� Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de r6vcler le rebord Po U TM j 1-800-GO-AVE i chargement p- p Easy Peep Labels ♦ Bend along line to I AVERY®5160® Use Avery(P Template 51600 j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j ID: 250 APN: 149-013-06 ID: 315 APN: 114-481-03 ID: 496 APN: 148-121-01 James Wright Jan Downs&Charles Javer Fein Properties Llc 703 Concord St 709 N Camden Dr 714 Oceanhill Dr Santa Ana, CA 92701-3203 Beverly Hills,CA 90210-3204 Huntington Beach, CA 92648-3741 ID: 71 APN: 148-081-18 ID: 25 APN: 148-044-29 ID: 58 APN: 148-043-34 Kst Water Management Llc Alejandro Arredondo Stephen Garcia 8068 Canyon Creek Cir Rosa M Vizcarra 8342 Kingfisher Dr Pleasanton,CA 94588-4764 826 S Orange Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92646-5548 Santa Ana, CA 92701-5848 ID: 22 APN: 148-043-46 ID: 20 APN: 148-044-30 ID: 23 APN: 148-043-45 Philip Snowden Tran Su Hong &Thu Pham Harvey Feinstein 8361 Doncaster Dr 8361 Lomond Dr 8371 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6904 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6911 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6904 ID: 24 APN: 148-044-02 ID: 1 APN: 148-041-43 ID: 28 APN: 148-043-44 John And Mary Koch Thomas Kuhn Eugen And Irma Desmet 8372 Doncaster Dr 8376 Terranova Cir 8381 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6905 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7644 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6904 ID: 26 APN: 148-044-28 ID: 27 APN: 148-044-03 ID: 2 APN: 148-041-44 Doris Bailey Xuan Vu&Ngoc Tran Dong Shim 8381 Lomond Dr 8382 Doncaster Dr 8386 Terranova Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6911 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6905 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7644 ID: 31 APN: 148-044-27 ID: 30 APN: 148-044-04 ID: 34 APN: 148-043-42 Michael And Blaine Brinsfield Ryan Schomberg&Suzanne Medeiros Toshiko Takahashi Spencer T Gilpatrick 8392 Doncaster Dr 8401 Doncaster Dr 8391 Lomond Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6905 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6911 ID: 32 APN: 148-044-26 ID: 5 APN: 148-041-46 ID: 35 APN: 148-043-41 Richard And Audrey Powers Tuan And Kathy Pham Samuel Stockinger 8401 Lomond Dr 8406 Terranova Cir Joni L Valley-stockinger Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7646 8411 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 ID: 36 APN: 148-044-06 ID: 6 APN: 148-041-47 ID: 40 APN: 148-043-40 Brian Teague Toan &Thang T Dam Robert And Kellie Stirrat 8412 Doncaster Dr 8416 Terranova Cir 8421 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 ID: 38 APN: 148-044-24 ID: 39 APN: 148-044-07 ID: 7 APN: 148-041-48 David And Vanessa Molinari Bruce Marble Nina Nguyen 8421 Lomond Dr 8422 Doncaster Dr 8426 Terranova Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7646 ID: 41 APN: 148-043-39 ID: 43 APN: 148-044-23 ID: 42 APN: 148-044-08 Richard And Angelina Johnson George Tripp Larry And Barbara Zwart 8431 Doncaster Dr 8431 Lomond Dr 8432 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 Etiquettes faciles 6 peler AItepliez la hachure afin de; vvww.avery com Lo chargement Utilisez le abarit AVERYO 51600 Sens de reveler le rebor p-d Po UpTm ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 ) 1 1 Easy Peel`r'Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to o AVERY0 51600 i Use Avery®Template 51600 J Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edgerm ID: 46 APN: 148-043-38 ID: 44 APN: 148-044-22 ID: 19 APN: 148-041-50 Patricia Marshall Anthony And Kim Aschenbrenner Joseph Szenyed 8441 Doncaster Dr 8441 Lomond Dr 8446 Terranova Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7646 ID: 47 APN: 148-043-37 ID: 49 APN: 148-044-21 ID: 48 APN: 148-044-10 Kevin And Debbie Williams Victor M. Martinez Walter Stossier 8447 Doncaster Dr 8447 Lomond Dr 8448 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 ID: 52 APN: 148-043-36 ID: 50 APN: 148-044-20 ID: 51 APN: 148-044-11 Larry And Marie Doran Michael And Sharon Talbutt James Tsusaki 8451 Doncaster Dr 8451 Lomond Dr 8452 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 ID: 53 APN: 148-043-35 ID: 54 APN: 148-044-12 ID: 56 APN: 148-044-18 Greig James W II Dept Of Vets Affairs Of State Of CA T And Leighton Pederson Karen L Isaacs-greig 8462 Doncaster Dr 8471 Lomond Dr 8461 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 ID: 57 APN: 148-044-13 ID: 59 APN: 148-043-33 ID: 61 APN: 148-044-17 Daniel And Mary Barnett Maureen Mills Jose Rodriguez&Corona 8472 Doncaster Dr 8481 Doncaster Dr 8481 Lomond Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 ID: 64 APN: 148-043-32 ID: 62 APN: 148-044-16 ID: 63 APN: 148-044-15 Patrick Szafirski Alice Loftis Doncaster Street Trust 8491 Doncaster Dr 8491 Lomond Dr 8492 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 ID: 81 APN: 148-081-07 ID: 86 APN: 148-082-11 ID: 84 APN: 148-086-21 Wayne A. Lewis Aileen Nguyen Aline Schaum 8512 Sandy Hook Dr 8521 Milne Dr 8521 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7005 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 ID: 85 APN: 148-086-22 ID: 82 APN: 148-081-06 ID: 83 APN: 148-081-06 Jason And Leilen Shelton Christian D Ambra D Christian 8522 Milne Dr 8522 Sandy Hook Dr 8522 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 ID: 107 APN: 148-082-33 ID: 110 APN: 148-086-20 ID: 109 APN: 148-086-23 Edward Williams Jerry Wells Michael Dangott 8531 Milne Dr 8531 Sandy Hook Dr 8532 Milne Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7005 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7006 ID: 111 APN: 148-081-05 ID: 108 APN: 148-082-32 ID: 113 APN: 148-086-19 Cathy Cowger Jean Ickhan Donald Stack 8532 Sandy Hook Dr 8541 Milne Dr 8541 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7005 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 ttiquettes faciles a peter ; 0 Repliez A la hachure An de; www avery com14 Utilisez le gabarit AVERY'S 51600 chSens dent r6veler le n�ord Pop-UPTm ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' rg 1 1 Easy Peele1 Labels i ♦ Bend along line to Q /4AMRY® 51604D Use Avery®Template 516015 j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID: 114 APN: 148-086-24 ID: 112 APN: 148-081-04 ID: 499 APN: 148-121-20 Ronald Fox Ryan And Carol Drumm H&Z Investments LIc 8542 Milne Dr 8542 Sandy Hook Dr 8551 Edison Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92648-3741 ID: 116 APN: 148-086-18 ID: 115 APN: 148-086-25 ID: 117 APN: 148-081-03 Andrew And Marilyn Bumatay Reynaldo And Lourdes Lopez Leslie Jepsen 8551 Sandy Hook Dr 8552 Milne Dr 8552 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 ID: 119 APN: 148-086-17 ID: 120 APN: 148-086-26 ID: 118 APN: 148-081-02 Joann Dickens Refugio Apodaca Steve Mc Kendry 8561 Sandy Hook Dr 8562 Milne Dr 8562 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7016 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7017 ID: 37 APN: 148-044-25 ID: 323 APN: 114-482-08 ID: 150 APN: 148-071-28 James Thies Shigeko Hosokawa Charles Lindsay 8563 Amazon River Cir 8570 Rock Fish Cir 8622 Hatteras Dr Fountain Valley,CA 92708-5510 Fountain Valley, CA 92708-5006 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 ID: 151 APN: 148-071-27 ID: 178 APN: 148-071-26 ID: 179 APN: 148-071-25 Brian And Suzanne Geisert Richard And Yvonne Button Michael Goldstein 8632 Hatteras Dr 8642 Hatteras Dr 8652 Hatteras Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7024 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7024 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7024 ID: 180 APN: 148-071-24 ID: 181 APN: 148-071-23 ID: 182 APN: 148-071-22 Joann Stevens Leon Hart Michael And Jena Buono 8662 Hatteras Dr 8682 Hatteras Dr Lynn Jena Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 8692 Hatteras Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 ID: 209 APN: 148-071-21 ID: 211 APN: 148-071-19 ID: 341 APN: 149-011-04 Patricia Tessier Billy And Robin Humphries Albert Ashurst 8702 Hatteras Dr 8732 Hatteras Dr 8886 Piumas Cir Unit 1122c Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7025 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7025 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-5766 ID: 325 APN: 114482-06 ID: 240 APN: 149-041-16 ID: 244 APN: 149-011-01 Jack Byrd Rodney And Patricia Magsanide Dominic Menaldi 8915 Woodlawn Dr 9001 Adelia Cir 9001 Bermuda Dr Granbury, TX 76049-4404 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7812 ID: 238 APN: 149-031-40 ID: 234 APN: 149-031-08 ID: 242 APN: 149-041-32 Devin And Danna Chase James And Elsa Harrington Tad And Nancy Buchoz 9001 Niguel Cir 9001 Regatta Dr 9001 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7847 ID: 241 APN: 149-041-17 ID: 237 APN: 149-031-25 ID: 268 APN: 114-481-19 Lydia King Janet Wineland Richard Mortimer 9002 Adelia Cir 9002 Bobbie Cir 9002 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Etiquettes faci0es'd peter ; ® Repliez h la hadwre afin de; www.avery.com Z-L, Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 j chargement r6vdler le rebord Pop UpT"+ 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to I ® i Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeT j A�RVO 51600 "^ ID: 239 APN: 149-041-01 ID: 235 APN: 149-031-09 ID: 243 APN: 149-041-33 William And Darlene Wall Francile Juhl Shirlee Earley 9002 Niguel Cir 9002 Regatta Dr 9002 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 ID: 269 APN: 114-481-20 ID: 282 APN: 149-041-15 ID: 278 APN: 149-011-02 David And Deanna Wagester Donald Churchward Guy Adams 9012 Christine Dr 9021 Adelia Cir 9021 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 ID: 286 APN: 149-031-23 ID: 284 APN: 149-031-39 ID: 280 APN: 149-041-31 Steven And Debra Clark James And Deborah Zisch Powell Odie L 3rd 9021 Bobbie Cir 9021 Niguel Cir 9021 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 ID: 281 APN: 149-041-18 ID: 277 APN: 149-023-12 ID: 285 APN: 149-031-26 Terry Finley Richard Kilekas Sandra Tyler 9022 Adelia Cir 9022 Aloha Dr 9022 Bobbie Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7802 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 ID: 270 APN: 114-481-21 ID: 283 APN: 149-041-02 ID: 287 APN: 149-031-10 Kourosh And Fariba Khavari Christopher And Mauren Moore Lynn Davis Bekki 9022 Christine Dr 9022 Niguel Cir 9022 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 ID: 279 APN: 149-041-34 ID: 295 APN: 149-041-14 ID: 299 APN: 149-011-03 Nasser And Jennifer Mustafa Patrick Beachner Ronald And Karen Jett 9022 Rhodesia Dr 9031 Adelia Cir 9031 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 ID: 293 APN: 149-031-38 ID: 289 APN: 149-031-06 ID: 297 APN: 149-041-30 Christopher Young Leon Madnick David Archibald 9031 Niguel Cir 9031 Regatta Dr 9031 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 ID: 296 APN: 149-041-19 ID: 292 APN: 149-031-27 ID: 271 APN: 114-481-22 Jerri Kuns Shawn And Elisha Roth Keith Tucker 9032 Adelia Cir 9032 Bobbie Cir 9032 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8314 ID: 294 APN: 149-041-03 ID: 290 APN: 149-031-11 ID: 298 APN: 149-041-35 John Oschman George Johnson C And L Peterson 9032 Niguel Cir 9032 Regatta Dr 9032 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7848 ID: 345 APN: 149-041-13 ID: 349 APN: 149-031-21 ID: 347 APN: 149-031-37 Brogdon Edward Velazquez Michael White &Catherine De Ceglie 9041 Adelia Cir 9041 Bobbie Cir 9041 Niguel Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 kiquettes faciles 6 peter ® Repliez a la hachure afin de I www avery com 7 sf chargement Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 i Sens de reveler ie rebord PoP' p U TM 1-800-GO-AVERY J � b Easy Peel1w Labels 1 ♦ Bend along line to I o AVERY@ 51600 ; Use Avery®Template 51604D Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edger^" J ID: 351 APN: 149-031-05 ID: 343 APN: 149-041-29 ID: 344 APN: 149-041-20 Kevin And Rebecca Broussard Bruce And Julie Barros E And V Moynagh 9041 Regatta Dr 9041 Rhodesia Dr 9042 Adelia Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 ID: 312 APN: 149-023-13 ID: 348 APN: 149-031-28 ID: 320 APN: 114-481-23 Manuel Urzua Eric Laipenieks Stanley Marriott 9042 Aloha Dr 9042 Bobbie Cir 9042 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8314 ID: 346 APN: 149-041-04 ID: 350 APN: 149-031-12 ID: 342 APN: 149-041-36 Sullivan Family Kenneth Crites Robert Norquist 9042 Niguel Cir 9042 Regatta Dr 9042 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 ID: 331 APN: 149-023-14 ID: 321 APN: 114-481-24 ID: 358 APN: 149-041-12 Ralph Osterkamp Philip And Suzanne Beukema May Zirbel 9052 Aloha Dr 9052 Christine Dr 9061 Adelia Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7805 ID: 333 APN: 149-024-27 ID: 354 APN: 149-031-20 ID: 335 APN: 149-022-27 Henry Kerfoot Garin And Rosario Payne Steve Gingrich 9061 Aloha Dr 9061 Bobbie Cir 9061 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7801 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7829 ID: 337 APN: 149-021-02 ID: 356 APN: 149-031-36 ID: 352 APN: 149-031-04 Jude Olivas Darren Magot Jerry And Denise Gutierrez 9061 Mahalo Dr 9061 Niguel Cir 9061 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7838 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 ID: 360 APN: 149-041-28 ID: 359 APN: 149-041-21 ID: 332 APN:.149-023-15 Robert And Paula Brown Carolyn Crockett Richard Legere 9061 Rhodesia Dr 9062 Adelia Cir 9062 Aloha Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 ID: 340 APN: 149-012-04 ID: 355 APN: 149-031-29 ID: 338 APN: 149-014-03 Robert Dayyat John And Sonia Villa Richard Loy 9062 Bermuda Dr 9062 Bobbie Cir 9062 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7813 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7819 ID: 334 APN: 149-024-04 ID: 336 APN: 149-022-04 ID: 357 APN: 149-041-05 Daniel And Sheri Rawlins John Engh David And Pamela Chapman 9062 Kapaa Dr 9062 Mahalo Dr 9062 Niguel Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7830 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 ID: 353 APN: 149-031-13 ID: 361 APN: 149-041-37 ID: 381 APN: 149-024-26 Don Kim Scott Swanson George Bullock 9062 Regatta Dr 9062 Rhodesia Dr 9071 Aloha Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7801 tigtlettes faciles paler ; ® Repliez a la hachure afin de; www avery Orn Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5160® j chargement rdveler le rebord Pop-Up*M I 1-800-GO-AVERY �'� Easy Peel®Labels A Bend along line to o /gv�1��0 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ®� expose Pop-Up Edge- 1 ID: 365 APN: 149-031-19 ID: 383 APN: 114-482-09 ID: 379 APN: 149-022-26 Mary Sindel Malcolm And Marianne Mac Kenzie Jason And J Pyle 9071 Bobbie Cir 9071 Christine Dr 9071 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8313 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7829 ID: 367 APN: 149-031-35 ID: 363 APN: 149-031-03 ID: 370 APN: 149-041-22 Samuel And Pamela Lafata Karl And Heidi Tahti Lenora Raia 9071 Niguel Cir 9071 Regatta Dr 9072 Adelia Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 ID: 366 APN: 149-031-30 ID: 384 APN: 114-481-26 ID: 380 APN: 149-024-05 Kenneth Roberts Karl Wysocki Erikka Thompson 9072 Bobbie Cir 9072 Christine Dr 9072 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7830 ID: 378 APN: 149-022-05 ID: 368 APN: 149-041-06 ID: 364 APN: 149-031-14 Gino And Jenny Angelici Raymond Zajac Edmund Moreno 9072 Mahalo Dr 9072 Niguel Cir 9072 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 ID: 372 APN: 149-041-38 ID: 408 APN: 149-041-10 ID: 396 APN: 149-024-25 Richard Smyser Edward And Yvette Arango Shirlee Stroner 9072 Rhodesia Dr 9081 Adelia Cir 9081 Aloha Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7801 ID: 373 APN: 149-011-06 ID: 412 APN: 149-031-18 ID: 386 APN: 114-482-10 James Olsen Gunnar Industries Ltd Steven Hayes 9081 Bermuda Dr 9081 Bobbie Cir 9081 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8313 ID: 375 APN: 149-012-26 ID: 398 APN: 149-022-25 ID: 377 APN: 149-021-03 Brian Hunter Gordon Emerson Robert Frye 9081 Kahului Dr 9081 Kapaa Dr 9081 Mahalo Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7818 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7829 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7838 ID: 410 APN: 149-031-34 ID: 414 APN: 149-031-02 ID: 406 APN: 149-041-26 John Sheedy Mark Bowman Chris Ogawa 9081 Niguel Cir 9081 Regatta Dr 9081 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 ID: 407 APN: 149-041-23 ID: 374 APN: 149-012-05 ID: 411 APN: 149-031-31 Richard And Roslyn Bashore Robert And Constance Mclin David And Kristine Wetzel 9082 Adelia Cir 9082 Bermuda Dr 9082 Bobbie Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7813 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7816 ID: 385 APN: 114-481-27 ID: 399 APN: 149-022-06 ID: 409 APN: 149-041-07 Foad Jahansouz&Maureen R Connolly Fast James A John Kaufmann 9082 Christine Dr 9082 Mahalo Dr 9082 Niguel Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 I:tiquettes faciles h peler ; ® Repliez A la hachure afin de www.avery.com 7 S Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 Sens de r�v�ler le rebord Po U Ta, ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 1 chamement Pop-Up j i Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ Bend along line to i Q �VI�Rv� 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edger"" 1 ID: 413 APN: 149-031-15 ID: 405 APN: 149-041-39 ID: 339 APN: 149-012-27 Robert And Lorraine Low Irene lannitti Neal Rieffanaugh 9082 Regatta Dr 9082 Rhodesia Dr 909 Tiller Way Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7848 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625-1649 ID: 421 APN: 149-041-09 ID: 404 APN: 149-011-07 ID: 417 APN: 149-031-17 Kevin And Erika Kelley Tuan Tran Kim And Daniel Healy 9091 Adelia Cir 9091 Bermuda Dr 9091 Bobbie Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7816 ID: 402 APN: 149-012-25 ID: 431 APN: 149-022-24 ID: 400 APN: 149-021-04 Walter And Carolyn Coyle Kenneth Whitehead Douglas And Lisa Ahuero 9091 Kahului Dr 9091 Kapaa Dr 9091 Mahalo Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7818 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7829 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7838 ID: 419 APN: 149-031-33 ID: 415 APN: 149-031-01 ID: 423 APN: 149-041-25 Thomas And Constance Bowles Joseph And Maria Young William Lacey 9091 Niguel Cir 9091 Regatta Dr 9091 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7847 ID: 422 APN: 149-041-24 ID: 395 APN: 149-023-17 ID: 403 APN: 149-012-06 Stevenson Family Stephen Willerth Scott Tracy 9092 Adelia Cir 9092 Aloha Dr Carmen Bridge Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 9092 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7813 ID: 418 APN: 149-031-32 ID: 401 APN: 149-014-05 ID: 432 APN: 149-024-07 William And Carol Ward Martha Kwan Allen Wachi 9092 Bobbie Cir 9092 Kahului Dr 9092 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7819 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7830 ID: 430 APN: 149-022-07 ID: 420 APN: 149-041-08 ID: 416 APN: 149-031-16 Stephen And Dorothy Brinkerhoff Michael Grossman Lorraine Lachapelle 9092 Mahalo Dr 9092 Niguel Cir 9092 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7844 ID: 424 APN: 149-041-40 ID: 437 APN: 149-024-23 ID: 425 APN: 149-011-08 Betty Wells Maida Seymour Anthony And Stella Zografides 9092 Rhodesia Dr 9101 Aloha Dr 9101 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7865 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7862 ID: 427 APN: 149-012-24 ID: 439 APN: 149-022-23 ID: 429 APN: 149-021-05 Donald And Joan Schlieter Donald Swords Harold Loomis 9101 Kahului Dr 9101 Kapaa Dr 9101 Mahalo Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7820 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7864 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7863 ID: 434 APN: 149-023-18 ID: 426 APN: 149-012-07 ID: 428 APN: 149-014-06 Herman Chenier Dennis Mc Donald Mark And Bettina Carnahan 9102 Aloha Dr 9102 Bermuda Dr 9102 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7804 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7815 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7825 Etiquettes faciles A peter ; Repliez la hachure afin de; vuww averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5160® Sens de r6vOier le rebord Po U TM 1-800-GO-AVERY L � chargement p' P Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to Use Averys Template 51600 1 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM �' AVERY0 51600 , ID: 438 APN: 149-024-08 ID: 394 APN: 114-482-18 ID: 446 APN: 149-041-41 Donald Davidson Christopher Condon Mark And Christine Mc Donell 9102 Kapaa Dr 9102 Playa Dr 9102 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7832 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8317 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7849 1D: 456 APN: 149-024-22 ID: 445 APN: 149-011-09 ID: 443 APN: 149-012-23 Alan And Erica Walencewicz William Stilwell Elizabeth Parkovich 9111 Aloha Dr 9111 Bermuda Dr 9111 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7865 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7862 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7820 ID: 436 APN: 149-023-19 ID: 444 APN: 149-012-08 ID: 442 APN: 149-014-07 Mark And Susan Semon Frederick Waterfall Rose And Michael Thurston 9112 Aloha Dr 9112 Bermuda Dr 9112 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7804 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7815 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7825 ID: 455 APN: 149-024-09 ID: 453 APN: 149-022-09 ID: 435 APN: 114-482-19 Ludele Jenkins Paul Strain Joe And Rita Croom 9112 Kapaa Dr 9112 Mahalo Dr Almanza Rita Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7832 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7841 Hunt Playa Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8317 ID: 447 APN: 149-041-42 ID: 448 APN: 149-011-10 ID: 450 APN: 149-012-22 Evangeline Rentas Kent Mc Garrigle Ole Oleson 9112 Rhodesia Dr 9121 Bermuda Dr 9121 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7849 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7862 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7820 ID: 14 APN: 148-041-08 ID: 457 APN: 149-023-20 ID: 322 APN: 114-481-25 Mortimer Shea Neil And Lori Wells Robert Dutton 9121 Kapaa Dr 9122 Aloha Dr 9122 Christine Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7864 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7804 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8316 ID: 528 APN: 114-160-82 ID: 451 APN: 149-014-08 ID: 458 APN: 114-493-31 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy J Kirkorn Quang Nguyen 9122 Kahului Dr 9122 Kahului Dr 9122 Playa Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7825 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7825 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8317 ID: 210 APN: 148-071-20 ID: 60 APN: 148-044-14 ID: 18 APN: 148-041-49 Martha Gamble Scott Underhill Phat Nguyen 9502 Smokey Cir 9881 Oceancrest Dr 9934 Thistle Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92646-5362 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8201 Fountain Valley, CA 92708-2044 ID: 460 APN: 114-150-50 ID: 532 APN: 114-481-34 ID: 3 APN: 148-041-45 State Of Calif Dept Of Public Works City Of Huntington Beach Seaside Terrace Inc Po Box 187000 Real Estate Services Div Po Box 3171 Sacramento, CA 95818-7000 Po Box 190 Cypress, CA 90630-7171 Huntington Beach,CA 92648-0190 ID: 134 APN: 148-086-02 1D: 87 APN: 148-082-12 ID: 263 APN: 114-481-14 Gunvor Aanensen Donald Pattison&Audrey E James Gary Gumbert Po Box 4108 Po Box 414 Po Box 483 Newport Beach,CA 92661-4108 Claremont,CA 91711-0414 Surfside, CA 90743-0483 ftiquettes fadles A peter Sens de Repliez A la hachure afin de www.averycom 2� Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 j chamement MOW le rebord Pop-UpTm j 1-800-GO-AVERY i Easy Peel®Labels ♦ Bend along line to n A�@��O 5160� i Use Avery®Template 51600 , Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM V ID: 291 APN: 149-031-22 ID: 265 APN: 114-481-16 ID: 515 APN: 114-150-63 Henry And Toni Baez Frank And Michelle Gandara Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy _ Po Box 5460 Po Box 5461 Po Box 5903 Huntington Beach, CA 92615-5460 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5461 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 ID: 516 APN: 114-160-86 ID: 517 APN: 114-160-75 ID: 518 APN: 114-160-70 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Po Box 5903 Po Box 5903 Po Box 5903 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 Huntington Beach, CA 92615-5903 ID: 519 APN: 114-160-84 ID: 397 APN: 149-024-06 ID: 371 APN: 149-041-27 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Yung Pan Ralph Silva Po Box 5903 Po Box 6094 Po Box 6756 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 Huntington Beach, CA 92615-6094 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-6756 - ID: 324 APN: 114-482-07 J Johnston ID: APN: ID: APN: Po Box 7932 - Newport Beach, CA 92658-7932 ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ID: APN: ttiquettes faciies 6 peler ; ®Utilisez le Repliez 6 la hachure afin de; vuvuw avery com abarit AVERY®51600 Sens de r6v6ler le rebord Po U TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 i charaement P- P t Z � Easy Peel®labels A ® Bend along line to o AVERVO 51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edger- J A ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 ID:467 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Occupant 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 14a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 15a 21730 Newland St Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7612 ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 16 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 20 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 21 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 5 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 6 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 7 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 9 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 10a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 1 a Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 3a 21851 Newland St Spc 126 21851 Newland St Spc 131 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Occupant Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 136 21871 Newland St Ofc 21851 Newland St Spc 57 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7617 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 58 21851 Newland St Spc 59 21851 Newland St Spc 71 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach;CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 72 21851 Newland St Spc 80 21851 Newland St Spc 93 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 99 21851 Newland St Spc 5 21851 Newland St Spc 6 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7622 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7622 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 11 21851 Newland St Spc 8 21851 Newland St Spc 16 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7624 hiquettes faciles 6 peler A Repliez A la hachure afin de www.avery com Sens de Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5160® i cha cement reveler le rebord Pop-UpT!4 1-800-GO-AVERY �'� i Easy Peel®Labels i A ® Bend along line to I W AVERYO 51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM J ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 17 21851 Newland St Spc 41 21851 Newland St Spc 42 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7624 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 43 21851 Newland St Spc 44 21851 Newland St Spc 46 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 102 21851 Newland St Spc 104 21851 Newland St Spc 107 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 108 21851 Newland St Spc 109 21851 Newland St Spc 124 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 140 21851 Newland St Spc 144 21851 Newland St Spc 147 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 151 21851 Newland St Spc 179 21851 Newland St Spc 195 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 200 21851 Newland St Spc 290 21851 Newland St Spc 216 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 224 21851 Newland St Spc 227 21851 Newland St Spc 230 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 232 21851 Newland St Spc 233 21851 Newland St Spc 236 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7636 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 238 21851 Newland St Spc 239 21851 Newland St Spc 243 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 9tiquettes faciles$peler Repliez 6 la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de r6v6ler le rebord Po U TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' � charaement P- P J i Easy Peel®Labels A ® Bend along line to � Q AVERVO 51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 , Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 245 21851 Newland St Spc 251 21851 Newland St Spc 258 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 264 21851 Newland St Spc 265 21851 Newland St Spc 266 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 270 21851 Newland St Spc 272 21851 Newland St Spc 273 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 282 21851 Newland St Spc 283 21851 Newland St Spc 285 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 286 21851 Newland St Spc 300 21851 Newland St Spc 303 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 306 21851 Newland St Spc 310 21851 Newland St Spc 311 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7641 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 313 21851 Newland St Spc 314 21851 Newland St Spc 1 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 507 APN: Resident Resident ID:APN: 21851 Newland St Spc 3 8641 Edison Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 Huntington Beach, CA 92648-3741 ID:APN: M:APN: ID:APN: ID:APN: ID:APN: ID:APN: tiquettes faCiles a paler i Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de i www.averycom -3' Utilisez le gabarit AVERI(®516040 chamement rev8ler le rebord Pop- p U Tb 1-800-GO-AVERY i J Easy PeelQ0 Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to n �����0 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeT"^ V Tom Luster, Environmental Scientist State Clearinghouse Ricky Ramos CA Coastal Commission State of CA Governor's Office of Planning City of Huntington Beach 45 Fremont St.#2000 1400 10th St. 200 Main Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2219 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Linda Adams,Secretary for EPA Lester Snow, Secretary for Natural Joe Geever CA Environmental Protection Agency Resources Surfrider Foundation 10011 Street 1416 Ninth St.#1311 P.O. Box 6010 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 San Clemente, CA 92674 Cy Oggins, Div. Environment Planning Christopher Herre, Branch Chief Greg Holmes, Unit Chief CA State Lands Commission Dept.of Transportation District 12 Department of Toxic Substances 100 Howe Ave.#100-South 3337 Michelson Dr.#380 5796 Corporate Ave. Sacramento,CA 95825-8202 Irvine,CA 92612-8894 Cypress,CA 90630 Ian MacMillan, Program Supervisor Kimberly Brandt, Development Srvc. Mark Lewis, Director of Public Works South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. District City of Costa Mesa City of Fountain Valley 21865 Copley Dr. 77 Fair Dr. 10200 Slater Ave. Diamond Bar,CA 91765-4182 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-4736 Marwan Youssef, Public Works Director Delaine Shane,Mgr. Environmental Shawn Dewant, Board President City of Westminster Planning Mesa Consolidated Water District 8200 Westminster Blvd. Metropolitan Water District of Southem CA 1965 Placentia Ave. Westminster,CA 92683 P.O. Box 54153 Costa Mesa,CA 92627 Los Angeles, CA 90054-0153 Michael Markus,General Manager Jenelle Froisland, Local Public Affairs Mgr. Paul Shoenberger Orange County Water District SCE CalDesal P.O. Box 8300 7333 Bolsa Ave. 1965 Placentia Ave. Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8300 Westminster,CA 92683 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Mary Jo Baretich,President Mark Adelson,Chief Regional Planner Robert Schaaf, Chairman Cabrillo Wetlands Conservancy CA Regional Water Quality Control Bd. City of Huntington Beach 27152 Pacific Coast Hwy#23A 3737 Main St.#500 Environmental Board Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Riverside,CA 92501-3348 607 Frankfort Ave. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Toby Moore,Water Resources Manager Colin Kelly,Staff Attorney Golden State Water Company Garry Brown, Executive Director Orange County Coastkeeper 1902 W.Corporate Way Elanor Starmor,Western Region Director 3151 Airway Ave.#F-110 Anaheim,CA 92801 Food&Water Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Don Schulz,Advisor Merle Moshiri David Hamilton Residents for Responsible Desalination 19412 Pompan Dr.#107 5401 Kenilworth Dr. P.O. Box 5422 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92615 Michael Balsamo, Mgr.Gen'I Land Use Eileen Murphy Jason Pyle Orange County Public Works 201 21s1 St. 9071 Kapaa Dr. P.O.Box 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 ttiquettes fables A peter - Repliez A la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 Al cha Bement rdveler le rebord Pop-UpTM 1-800-GO-AVERY 3 7 1 tasy Feef Labels i ® Bend along line to i ? © AVERYO 51600 i Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM Use Avery®Template 5160® j John Scott Scott Smith Beverly Spaulding 22032 Capistrano Lane 21341 Yarmouth Lane 20322 Eastwood Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Carol&Fred Speaker Howard Wynn 207 6th St. 19195 Woodlands Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 �� ���az-1��► �NF�-u�S� p�u�-� �dpNl�. t�sH�,Ss�� 1'I'-If_-51PV_"'7T VOCa&12- q152 S$ I t— 1;'P^I` GK�I� ` , Lp oivfp3o -N'131 Cl zv z LP JpSol-f :PYL'V_- I-,a "I 6/a41,LAY 011t2 12A pt*- -10 11 k7wpp to 31�ty I'^`'iv =Ero bP- . plAW,Nt�1�tJ t C,p �rZc�Ht/ f U 1N�ttotJ I��rf '��p g2to�tto t'NNT'I►.1�-t�hl t per, Cep 43 lip uq Jo51i? H�'INI��J I K531 »N"r1.11�1 I.IJ• �'1v�. f'^�''.��•1b W�`C 1,101t 13h -*'qDo {�u1�TtiNbr1L1J ( jay�� L# �t21o'i� �NN1'INt�1vIJ �tpf+Lt�� C'j� °IZI�N�I NN1iT'INdti�N G}�, G►ZII''1'1���. HpNA�I�- t PAN pvlp��tl. •pf�TlUp� p5tc�l g'7 ci L 0' CC-1' � G�lfiF1<ss, ��' gc�c�3o G"ffl' '`'. f+ q ts3 I IID ® IY IIg IE 9 ® N R C lE S City Clerks Office September 16, 2010 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach Coastal Development Permit On September 7th, 2010, the Huntington Beach City Council held a public hearing concurrently on agenda items 4.1 through 4.5 inclusive. The public hearing was closed that evening. For agenda item 4.2, the Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) No. 10-001 and the amendment of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 02-04 was approved. Action on Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-130 was continued until the City Councils September 20, 2010 meeting (the TPM was.to be taken up in connection with a new Coastal Development Permit). In addition, action on agenda item 4-3 (the Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement) was continued until the September 20 meeting. On September 20th, 2010, the City Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing on the new Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 10-014 and consider adoption of Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10,-130. It is also scheduled to consider adoption of the Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement. Poseidon requests that the entire public hearing record for agenda items 4.1 through 4.5, inclusive, for the City Council's September 7, 2010 meeting be included as part of the public hearing record for those upcoming actions. Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (714) .596-7946. Sincerely, Josie McKinley , Director, Project Development Poseidon Resources ` �/2®//0 ram . cc: Fred Wilson, City Administrator Poseidon Resources 17011 Beach Boulevard,Suite 900,Huntington Beach,CA 92647,USA 714-596-7946 Fax 714-596-7947 Executive Office 1055 Washington Boulevard,Stamford,CT 06901 RONALD A. VAN BLARCOM ATTORNEY AT LAW 204 NORTH CALIFORNIA STREET 7, 7, ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92866 _ " (714)608-9897 � 2 �� 9 ron@vanblarcomlaw.com 20 September 20, 2010 Honorable Mayor Cathy Green Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach, California 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project; Agenda Item 6-1 for the September 20, 2010 Council Meeting Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: I represent Poseidon Resources and, as you know from my previous correspondence, I have been involved with the permitting of the proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach since 2002. Last week, when you certified Subsequent EIR No. 10-001 and approved several related actions, you deferred action on the Coastal Development Permit (CDP), the Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) and the Restated and Amended Owner Participation Agreement (OPA). On behalf of Poseidon, I respectfully request that the City Council approve those items tonight and take action in accordance with City staff s recommendations on Agenda Items 6-1, 6-2. I also ask that you follow City staffs recommendation to approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3891 (Item 6-3) in furtherance of the action taken to approve the Franchise Agreement at your last meeting. This letter also is provided in response to a series of similar letters you received last week opposing your adoption of the CDP for the Poseidon project. Each of the letters included a "First Cause for Opposition" and a "Second Related Cause for Opposition." Neither of those"causes"has merit. The various authors of the similar letters first suggest that the City Council should not approve CDP No. 10-014 because "substantial issues" were raised when previous CDP No. 02-05 was appealed to the California Coastal Commission. In an attempt to stir up procedural confusion, the letter-writers argue that the City Council cannot consider CDP No. 10-014 "before resolving the substantial issues raised in the outstanding appeals." However, in a letter dated, September 2, 2010, Coastal Commission staff member, Tom Luster, specifically requested that the City rescind CDP No. 02-05: "we recommend that the City rescind its original approved CDP (thus making the appeal to the Commission null and void) and then make a decision on a new CDP, which might then be appealed to the Commission." Accordingly, City staff has recommended that CDP No. 02-05 be rescinded in connection with the approval of CDP No. 10-014 (see, 91�116) Poseidon Response to Opposition to Approval of CDP September 20, 2010 Page 2 Agenda Item 6-1), and Poseidon has also requested that same action. If CDP No. 02-05 is rescinded, there will be no issues — substantial or otherwise — to be resolved with respect to the appeal of that CDP to the Coastal Commission. It is fully within the City's authority to adopt a new CDP for the Project. Section 245.16 of the City's Coastal Zoning Ordinance clearly vests the City Council with the authority to approve or deny a CDP as the approval authority for the Project's other discretionary entitlements. Nothing in the.Coastal Zoning Ordinance, the Coastal Act or its implementing regulations limit or otherwise remove the City Council's authority to rescind a CDP that has been appealed to the Commission and to adopt a new CDP for the Project. Coastal Act Section 30623 and Coastal Act Regulations Section 13112 provide only that the "operation and effect" of an approved CDP is "stayed pending a decision on appeal." This language neither restricts the City's ability to rescind the appealed CDP nor does it limit the City's authority to take action on new CDP.1 The second "related cause for opposition" involves the City's land use designation for the site of the proposed seawater desalination facility. The opponents continue to argue that the zoning of the site does not allow for the proposed seawater desalination facility use. This is not a new issue for the City, and the City's position was clearly stated in connection with its approval of CUP 02-04 and CDP 02-05 almost five years ago. More importantly, this City Council has again determined that the proposed desalination facility use is consistent with the land use designation for the site. In connection with your approval of Entitlement Plan Amendment 10-001 (Amending Conditional Use Permit 02-04), Agenda Item 4-1 as approved on September 7, 2010, you adopted Finding No. 3 and Finding No. 4 of the Suggested Findings of Approval. Finding No. 3 states that the "project as proposed and modified by the conditions of approval is consistent with the PS-0-CZ (Public-Semipublic - Oil Production Overlay - Coastal Zone Overlay) zoning district." Finding No. 4 states that the project "is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property because it will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, and it is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities." In addition, the issue was extensively discussed in Final Subsequent EIR 10-001, certified by the City Council on September 7, 2010 (see, for example, Comment CCC-23 in the June 21, 2010 letter from Coastal Commission staff member, Tom Luster, and Response CCC-23 in the Final SEIR). In addition, the changes to the project description concerning the Project's potential operation as a "stand alone" facility address issues that were raised in the prior appeal of CDP 02-05 and in the Commission's Substantial Issue determination on that CDP. Specifically, the Commission staff previously asserted that the Recirculated EIR 'Although the City chose to follow Commission staff s recommended approach to rescind the original approved CDP and to take action on a new CDP,the same authority cited above also supports the City's authority to amend a CDP that has been appealed to the Commission. Poseidon Response to Opposition to Approval of CDP September 20, 2010 Page 3 the City certified in 2005 in conjunction with its approval of CDP 02-05 did "not describe the adverse effects that would be caused by the desalination facility operating on its own, which will be different and in some cases more substantial than the effects caused by the two facilities operating together." (See Commission Staff Report and Recommendation on Appeal Substantial Issue, Agenda WSA, Appeal No. A-5-HNB-06-101, March 23, 2006, at p. 4, fn. 1.) In order to address and evaluate these issues, Final Subsequent EIR 10-001, as certified by the City Council, contains extensive analyses of the Project's potential entrainment impacts on marine life during"stand alone" operating conditions. The analysis in Section 4.10 of Final Subsequent EIR 10-001 demonstrates that the Project's entrainment impacts under "stand alone" conditions would be less than significant because the Project's impacts on marine organisms are relatively small, would not substantially reduce populations of affected species, or affect the ability of the affected species to sustain their populations. The Project's "stand alone" operations as analyzed in the Final Subsequent EIR also are fully consistent with the LCP's policies concerning marine life. Accordingly, the provisions in CDP No. 10-014 allowing the Project to operate as a "stand alone" facility are appropriate and consistent with the LCP and the Final Subsequent EIR. Based on the foregoing, on behalf of Poseidon, I respectfully request that the City Council approve CDP No. 10-014 and the related actions (Agenda Item Nos. 6-1, 6-2 and 6-3). Please do not hesitate to call on me tonight if I can assist in your consideration of these matters. Very truly yours, W46--- Ronald A. Van Blarcom cc: S. Maloni 2910SEP 20 P11 Surftider Foundation. TO: Huntington Beach City Council FROM: Surfrider Foundation DATE: September 20, 2010 RE: Poseidon Resources Ocean Desalination- Coastal Development Permit No 10-014 &Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 -- OPPOSE Via Electronic Mail: pesI2arzaPsurfcity-hb.Qrg and rramos0surfcity-hb.org Dear Mayor Green and City Council Members: I am writing on behalf of Surfrider Foundation in regards to your consideration of approving a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) for the recent changes in the proposed Poseidon Resources Ocean Desalination Plant. The changes made to the project proposal raise serious and significant issues. Unfortunately, rather than amending the project proposal to address substantial issues raised in our appeal of the previous CDP, the changes have only exacerbated inconsistencies with the mandates and policies in the City's Local Coastal Program. Please find below our comments on the inconsistencies of the proposed project with your Local Coastal Program, listed in the order they appear in the Staff Report and Attachment One to the CDP: "Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval/Coastal Development Permit No. 10-014/Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130. " With that in mind,we request the City Council to deny the CDP and TPM with instructions to staff to remedy the issues raised below. Thank you for your careful and thorough consideration of the issues raised in these comments.We look forward to working with you in the future to assure that if an ocean desalination facility is to be built in Huntington Beach, it is economically and environmentally sound and meets all legal mandates -including compliance with the mandates of the California Environmental Quality Act and your Local Coastal Program. Sincerely, Joe Geever Surfrider Foundation - California Policy Coordinator 8117 W Manchester Avenue, #297 Playa del Rey, CA 90293 jgeever@)surfrider.or -- (949) 636-8426 9 Comments on CDP and Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Parcel Map The proposed parcel subdivision would accommodate a use of the property that is inconsistent with the "Public" land use designation in the General Plan. 1. The Staff Report for the CDP argues that the use of the property for industrial water manufacturing is "similar" to use of the site for the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS). However, the HBGS is clearly a utility in that it is registered with, and regulated by, the California Public Utilities Commission. The Staff Report further tries to justify the inconsistent use by characterizing the use as consistent with "water or wastewater treatment plants... and similar facilities of public agencies or public utilities."See Findings& Conditions of Approval,Attachment Not at page 1.13. The proposed desalination facility is not similar to a water or wastewater treatment facility in any conventional use of those terms and the project proponent is neither a "public" agency or"public" utility- as described in the code section cited in the Findings. 2. Given that the use of the property is inconsistent with the zoning designation, it is also inconsistent with the LCP. This inconsistency can only be remedied by an amendment of the City's certified LCP. Coastal Development Permit 1. LCP Objective C1.1 (Findings 1a at Attachment (Att) No. 1.21 a. The Findings fail to list all the adverse impacts from the project nor the associated minimization and/or mitigation measures. For example,there is no discussion of mitigating the entrainment of marine life from a "stand alone operation",the impacts of the brine and/or filter cleaning solution discharge to the ocean, etc. Further,the SEIR documents growth inducement as a significant impact,and the Staff Report recommends a Statement of Overriding Conditions. However, the Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Plan assumes the product water would "replace" imported water from the State Water Project (SWP) and subtracts the energy used to import that foregone imported water to calculate a purported "net" energy demand. These are contradictory Findings. Either the water replaces imported water or it is added to the regional supply portfolio and allows growth inducement. These specific issues are addressed below. 2. LCP Policy C.1.1 (Findings 1b at Att No 1.2) a. The Findings are inadequate to support the conclusion of consistency with this LCP Policy. In fact, the Findings are inconsistent with LCP Policy 8.2.4 in that the entire site has been designated by the Coastal Commission as an area available for coastal dependent energy facilities in accordance with Coastal Act section 30264 (and by reference Coastal Act section 30413). The proposed project would interfere with potential expansion of the energy facility as contemplated in the designation of the site under the mandates of section 30264 and 30413 of the Coastal Act. 3. LCP Policy C1.1.2 (Findings 1c at Att No. 1.2) a. The Staff Findings are incorrect that the facility would need to be "sited on or adjacent to the sea to function at all." Seawater could be pumped to a facility outside the Coastal Zone. In fact, many of the other"similar" facilities cited in the Staff Findings are no longer and/or never have been coastal dependent. 4. LCP Policy C 1.2.1 (Findings 1d at Att No. 1.3) a. As noted elsewhere in these Comments,this proposed project is not consistent with uses allowed in an area designated for"Public" uses. b. Further, the Findings do not analyze the proposal for compliance with LCP Policy 1.2.2 in the apparent numeric order in the rest of the Findings. Consistency with LCP Policy 1.2.2 is critical to ensuring the project is consistent with the Policy to ensure projects are "designed to account for the unique characteristics of project sites and objectives for Coastal Zone character...." S. LCP Policy C6.1.1 (Findings 11 at Att No. 1.5) a. As with many of the Findings,this section confuses the Policies in the LCP with the standards of CEQA findings of"significant impacts" before mitigation is required to reduce those impacts to less than significant. In this particular instance,the LCP requires "enhancement" of water quality, if feasible; and, at a minimum, prevent the degradation of water quality...." Unlike CEQA standards, there is no requirement to find that the project contributes "significant" impacts to water quality. Just the opposite -the Policy requires either enhancement or strict prohibition of any degradation of water quality. b. The Findings state "the project will enhance water quality by removing bacteria from source water" -but offers no explanation of that statement. c. The Findings state that"neither the Project's discharge of trace amounts of cleaning compounds nor the slightly elevated salinity levels in the area will degrade the quality of ocean water surrounding the existing HBGS and the proposed desalination facility." [We assume the Findings are referring to the ocean water surrounding the HBGS discharge conduit.] The Findings then contradict that statement by documenting the constituents added to the existing discharge and concluding that"Dilution of these substances will even further minimize the already less than significant impacts on the local environment." Once again,the Findings are not relevant to the Policy in that they equate compliance with CEQA standards with much stricter mandates in the LCP Policy. d. Further, public comments submitted challenging the analysis and findings in the SEIR undermine the adequacy of the conclusions in that document and consequently further undermine the Findings in regard to the mandates of this LCP Policy. 6. LCP Policies C6.1.2. C6.1.4. and C6.1.19 (Findings 1 in. o. and r at Att 1.6 through 1.91 a. These policies, individually and in combination,generally require maintenance, enhancement or restoration of marine living resources. LCP Policy C6.1.19 specifically requires maximum feasible mitigation measures to minimize damage to marine organisms due to entrainment. b. Much of the discussion of the impacts of the discharge from the proposed project again inadequately equate CEQA standards with the mandates of the LCP Policy being evaluated in the Findings. This renders much of the Findings irrelevant and inadequate to support the conclusion that the proposed project is consistent with the Policy. See Comment 5 above. c. As for the Policy C6.1.19, once again the Findings wrongly equate CEQA findings of significance before the requirement of mitigation with the stricter LCP Policy requirement to minimize damage to marine organisms from entrainment in accordance with state and federal law. The most relevant state or federal laws are: similar provisions in the Coastal Act to those in LCP Policy C6.1.19, and the California Water Code section 13142.5(b) - neither of which require a finding of significant impacts before measures must be implemented to minimize the intake of marine life.As was found for the Poseidon .project in Carlsbad, significant mitigation must be included in the conditions of approval for the City to be in compliance with its own Local Coastal Program and the California Water Code section 13142.5(b)`The City simply cannot avoid the necessity to prepare a Marine Life Mitigation Plan that enforces this LCP Policy. d. Finally, the Findings in 1r include some discussion of technology employed by the HBGS to reduce impingement. First,the City's LCP Policy C6.1.19 specifically mandates mitigation of entrainment- so this discussion of mitigation measures to reduce the mortality of marine life from impingement is irrelevant. Second,the Findings imply that technology to reduce marine life mortality from the existence of a velocity cap and bar racks will bring the operation of the proposed "stand alone" facility into compliance with the Water Code are entirely speculative. The velocity cap and bar racks will not reduce entrainment from operation of the facility. Therefore, the Findings are irrelevant, entirely speculative and wrong. e. Further,to be thorough in the Findings regarding compliance with the California Water Code section 13142.5(b), it should be noted in the Findings that the decision by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board that"after the fact" restorative measures are consistent with the Water Code are currently under challenge in on-going litigation. 7. LCP Policy C7.1.3. C7.1.4 & C7.1.5 (Findings 1s. t&u at Att no. 1.10 through 1.12 a. The Findings, at page 1.11, state that a greater buffer zone must be considered for the project for: "a) Biological significance of adjacent lands: The buffer should be sufficiently wide to protect the functional relationship between wetland and adjacent upland. b) Sensitivity of species to disturbance: the buffer should be sufficiently wide to ensure that the most sensitive species will not be disturbed significantly by permitted development, based on habitat requirements of both resident and migratory species and the long and short term adaptability of various species to human disturbance." b. During the City Council discussion of the SEIR, it was discovered that the tests conducted to determine noise levels from the construction and operation of the proposed facility were inadequate. The applicant verbally promised to conduct further studies after the facility was operating to remedy the inadequate studies and mitigate excessive noise to the standards established for residential neighbors.See: Findings atAttachment No. 1-20, 4(d). It is important to note that deferring adequate noise studies and noise mitigation measures until after the CDP has been approved,with the limited specificity included in Conditions of Approval, effectively eliminates the inclusion of this LCP Policy in the CDP. Nonetheless, the Findings conclude that the project would not create impacts of biological significance between the adjacent wetland and uplands and would protect the most sensitive species. c. Without adequate noise studies,the Findings have not, and cannot, conclude that the project will be consistent with C7.1.3, C7.1.4 and/or C7.1.5. The mention of potential "noise attenuation features" to be determined in the future are not sufficient for approval of the CDP. d. Finally, because the project proposal has yet to identify the final pipeline route, it is impossible to determine if the pipeline will cross the Santa Ana River and or include pumping stations or other necessary facilities that may impact sensitive species and/or habitat. To our knowledge, the Army Corps of Engineers has not been consulted in regards to crossing the Santa Ana River. 8. LCP Goal C8 &Policy C8.2.4 (Findings 1v&w at Att No 1.12 a. As mentioned above in Comment 2, the project proposal,the Findings and the CDP do not adequately address the fact that the entire property was listed as an area available for future energy facility expansion in accordance with Coastal Act section 30264 and 30413. b. The Findings rely on a conclusion that the proposed project will accommodate reconfiguration of an existing facility. That is not equivalent to finding the proposed project will accommodate future energy facilities - as contemplated in the Coastal Act. 9. LCP Policy C8.3.1 (Findings 1x at Att. No. 1.12), a. The Findings state that the proposed project"would reduce energy that would otherwise be needed to pump 56,000 acre feet of water per year into Orange County." Likewise the Findings conclude that "the project would avoid 175,000 MWh/yr of electricity" by the above assumption that the project would "replace"water currently pumped to the region. b. In contradiction of that assumption, the SEIR assumes the project will create a significant"growth inducement" in the region by providing water for development that would otherwise not occur. c. It is well known and documented that ocean desalination is the most energy-demanding source of new water supplies for the region in comparison to available alternatives such as greater conservation and wastewater recycling. d. The proposed project is inconsistent with the City's LCP Policy to encourage energy conservation and the Findings inaccurately assert that the project will actually conserve energy by offsetting the energy demand of imported water. e. Finally, the Findings assert that the "Energy minimization and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan"will not cause an increase above the existing baseline - "consistent with Coastal Act section 30253(4) and other applicable Coastal Act and LCP policies. First, this is an inaccurate statement for the reasons stated above.And second, it is inappropriate for the City to adopt findings on Coastal Act provisions outside the scope of their LCP. 10. LCP Policy C10.1.4 (Findings 1y at Att. No. 1.13) a. The Findings conclude that the project is consistent with this policy "because it adheres to all appropriate and applicable building standards related to ground shaking and liquefaction." b. However,the route of the pipeline is, as yet, not finalized. The Findings fail to identify which potential pipeline route and construction plans are being considered in the brief summary conclusion that the project is consistent with this LCP policy. c. Further,testimony was given at the September 7, 2010 City Council hearing that documented the construction plans for the pipeline could not be accomplished in a way that ensures against impacts related to liquefaction. Esparza, Pay From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 4:29 PM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 6510 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Question Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Mary Jo Baretich Description: TO: Huntington Beach City Council FROM: Mary Jo Baretich, President, Cabrillo Wetlands Conservancy, Inc. DATE: September 17, 2010 RE: OPPOSE the Adoption of Poseidon Ocean Desalination Coastal Development Permit Dear Mayor Green & City Council Members: We are writing on behalf of the Cabrillo Wetlands Conservancy, Inc. to oppose the adoption of the proposed Coastal Development Permit (CDP) for the Poseidon Ocean Desalination facility. First Cause for Opposition The current Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 was appealed to the California Coastal Commission in 2006 for numerous violations of the City's certified Local Coastal Program. The several appeals by citizens and public interest organizations, as well as Coastal Commissioners, were found to have raised substantial issues. These findings by the Coastal Commission triggered a requirement by the Coastal Commission to hold a subsequent hearing to resolve the issues raised in the several appeals. Importantly, the City of Huntington Beach did not object to the Coastal Commission finding that the appeals raised substantial issues. However, neither the City nor the Applicant, Poseidon Resources, has taken any steps to resolve the issues. We oppose the City's issuance of a new CDP for the project before resolving the substantial issues raised in the outstanding appeals. Second Related Cause for Opposition Further, the recent changes to the project do not resolve the substantial issues raised in the several appeals, but in fact only serve to exacerbate the issues. First,the proposed project changes demand a Tentative Parcel Map to configure the several parcels on the site to accommodate moving the proposed facility. This alteration in the proposed project only exacerbates the outstanding substantial issue questioning whether an industrial use of the property is consistent with the land use designation and restrictions for"Public" uses. An change to the current designation of the property as "Public" is necessary before allowing an inconsistent industrial use on the site. This necessary change in the land use designation mandates an amendment to the City's certified Local Coastal Program before issuing a new CDP for the changes in site location. Also, the changes in the project description include a provision for operating the ocean desalination proposed project as a"stand alone" facility. That is, in contrast to the existing CDP approved by the �City (and on appeal to the Coastal Commission), the new CDP would allow the project to withdraw seawater through the existing powerplant infrastructure after the powerplant discontinues use of that infrastructure. Again, this simply exacerbates marine life mortality through entrainment and the finding of the Coastal Commission that the current CDP raised substantial issue in regard to compliance with the City's LCP. We oppose the City's issuance of a new CDP until the new issues raised by changes in the proposed project are resolved through an appropriate LCP amendment to allow the inconsistent use of the property, as well as the inclusion of mitigation of marine life from entrainment mandated in the City's Local Coastal Program. CONCLUSION In brief, we are opposed to the City Council issuing a new Coastal Development Permit to replace an existing permit that has been appealed to the Coastal Commission and found to raise substantial issues before those appealable issues are resolved. It would be inconsistent with your duty to enforce your own Local Coastal Program to issue a new CDP for a project that has not been modified to address the substantial issues currently on appeal to the Coastal Commission. But possibly more importantly, we are opposed to issuing a new CDP for a revised project when the revisions not only fail to address the substantial issues on appeal to the Coastal Commission, but in fact exacerbate the inconsistencies with the City's own Local Coastal Program. Finally, we reserve the right to raise new issues in regard to the new CDP until after the final CDP language, and accompanying Staff Report and Findings, are made available to the public. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Mary Jo Baretich, President Cabrillo Wetlands Conservancy, Inc. 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy #23A Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Expected Close Date: 09/20/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. 2 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:59 PM To: Esparza, Patty Cc: Broeren, Mary Beth;jmckinley@poseidon1.com Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:53 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Desal Project From: kathryn barr [mailto:kbarr002@socal.rr.com] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:48 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desal Project support your efforts completely. Kathryn L. Barr /C) Esparza, Patty From: Paul Brown [spaulb@earthlink.net] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 3:06 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Support Desalination Plant Dear Sir and Madame: My name is Paul Brown and I reside at 412 8th Street and have been a resident since 2004. 1 wish to say that I support the desalination plant. While I respect the environmental concerns, we need to initiate this project and commit to ongoing improvement of the technology. If we can master this technology it will provide tremendous opportunties for California. Thank you. Paul Brown 412 8th Street Huntington Beacg, CA 92648 i Esparza, Pat!y From: Karen Cornell [elephant92648@verizon.net] Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 5:45 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination project As a 19 year resident of Huntington Beach, I strongly urge the City Council to approve the Local Coastal Development Permit. I support the project and hope the Council quickly moves the permit process along. Thank you, Karen Cornell 7962 Moonmist Circle HB 92648 6467-7F �� �TO: Huntington Beach City Council FROM: PennyBka DATE: September 18. 2018 RE: Adoption of Poseidon Ocean Desalination Coastal Development Permit—OPPOSE Via electronic maU� Dear Mayor Green & City Council Members: | om writing tuoppose the adoption of the proposed Coastal Development Permit(CDP) for the Poseidon Ocean Desalination facility. First Cause for Opposition The current Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 was appealed to the California Coastal Commission in 2006 for numerous violations of the City's certified Local Coastal Program. The several appeals by citizens and public interest organizations, as well as Coastal Commissioners, were found to have raised substantial issues. These findings by the Coastal Commission triggered a requirement by the Coastal Commission to hold a subsequent hearing to resolve the issues raised in the several appeals. Importantly, the City of Huntington Beach did not object to the Coastal Commission finding that the appeals raised substantial issues. However. neither the City nor the Applicant, Poseidon Rasounoeo, has taken any steps to resolve the issues. We oppose the City's issuance of a new CDP for the project before resolving the substantial issues raised in the outstanding appeals. Second Related Cause for Opposition Further, the recent changes to the project dn not resolve the substantial issues raised in the several appeals, but in fact only serve hoexacerbate the issues, First, the proposed project changes demand a Tentative Parcel Map to configure the several parcels un the site to accommodate moving the proposed facility. This alteration in the proposed project only exacerbates the outstanding substantial issue questioning whether an industrial use of the property ia consistent with the land use designation and restrictions for 'Public" uses, Any change hu the current designation of the property as^Pub|io^ im necessary before allowing on inconsistent industrial use on the site. This necessary change in the land use designation mandates an amendment hz the City's certified Local Coastal Program before issuing a new CDP for the changes in site location- Also, the changes in the projec description include a provision for operating the ocean desalination proposed project aam"stand alone"facility. That is, /ncontrast to the existing CDP approved by the City (and on appeal to the Coastal Commission), the new CDP would allow the project to withdraw seawater through the existing powerplant infrastructure after the powerplant discontinues use of that infrastructure. Again, this simply exacerbates marine life mortality through entrainment and the finding of the Coastal Commission that the current CDP raised substantial issue in regard to compliance with the City's LCP. I oppose the City's issuance of a now CDP until the new issues raised by changes in the proposed project are resolved through an appropriate LCP amendment to allow the inconsistent use ofthe property,eewell as the inclusion of mitigation of marine life from entrainment mandated in the City'm Local Coastal Program. ��� �� ���� L�9�'K- , ' ��~�^ ~- CONCLUSION In brief, I am opposed to the City Council issuing a new Coastal Development Permit to replace an existing permit that has been appealed to the Coastal Commission and found to raise substantial issues before those appealable issues are resolved. It would be inconsistent with your duty to enforce your own Local Coastal Program to issue a new CDp for aproject that has not been modified tV address the substantial issues currently nn appeal 0o the Coastal Commission. But possibly more important, I am opposed to issuing a new CDP for a revised project when the revisions not only fail to address the substantial issues on appeal to the Coastal Commission, but in fact exacerbate the inconsistencies with theCity'a own Local Coastal Program- Finally. I reserve the right to raise new issues in regard to the new CDP until after the final CDP language and accompanying Staff Report and Findings, are made available to the public Thank you for your consideration, Sin / J PennyBka � 3O832 Marilyn Drive Laguna Beach. CA 92651 049-499'4498 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 7:53 AM To: Esparza, Patty Cc: Broeren, Mary Beth;jmckinley@poseidon1.com Subject: Poseidon LC From: Fran Gibson [mailto:fragibson@comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 5:01 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: Poseidon Ocean Desal CDP before the Huntington Beach City Council -- OPPOSE TO: Huntington Beach City Council FROM: Fran Gibson DATE: September 18, 2010 RE: Adoption of Poseidon Ocean Desalination Coastal Development Permit—OPPOSE Via electronic mail: rramos(o)-surfcity-hb.org Dear Mayor Green &City Council Members: I am writing to oppose the adoption of the proposed Coastal Development Permit(CDP) for the Poseidon Ocean Desalination facility. First Cause for Opposition The current Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 was appealed to the California Coastal Commission in 2006 for numerous violations of the City's certified Local Coastal Program. The several appeals by citizens and public interest organizations, as well as Coastal Commissioners, were found to have raised substantial issues. These findings by the Coastal Commission triggered a requirement by the Coastal Commission to hold a subsequent hearing to resolve the issues raised in the several appeals. Importantly, the City of Huntington Beach did not object to the Coastal Commission finding that the appeals raised substantial issues. However, neither the City nor the Applicant, Poseidon Resources, has taken any steps to resolve the issues. I oppose the City's issuance of a new CDP for the project before resolving the substantial issues raised in the outstanding appeals. Second Related Cause for Opposition Further, the recent changes to the project do not resolve the substantial issues raised in the several appeals, but in fact only serve to exacerbate the issues. First, the proposed project changes demand a Tentative Parcel Map to configure the several parcels on the site to accommodate moving the proposed facility. This alteration in the proposed project only exacerbates the outstanding substantial issue questioning whether an industrial use of the property is consistent with the land use designation and restrictions for"Public" uses. Any change to the current designation of the property as"Public" is necessary before allowing an inconsistent industrial use on the site. This necessary change in the land use designation mandates an amendment to the City's certified Local Coastal Program before issuing a new CDP for the changes in site location. Also, the changes in the project description include a provision for operating the ocean desalination proposed project as a "stand alone" facility. That is, in contrast to the existing CDP approved by the City (and on appeal to the Coastal Commission), the new CDP would allow the project to withdraw seawater through the existing powerplant infrastructure �� (�omM X 4 V:= after the powerplant discontinues use of that infrastructure. Again, this simply exacerbates marine life mortality through entrainment and the finding of the Coastal Commission that the current CDP raised substantial issue in regard to compliance with the City's LCP. I oppose the City's issuance of a new CDP until the new issues raised by changes in the proposed project are resolved through an appropriate LCP amendment to allow the inconsistent use of the property, as well as the inclusion of mitigation of marine life from entrainment mandated in the City's Local Coastal Program. CONCLUSION In brief, I am opposed to the City Council issuing a new Coastal Development Permit to replace an existing permit that has been appealed to the Coastal Commission and found to raise substantial issues before those appealable issues are resolved. It would be inconsistent with your duty to enforce your own Local Coastal Program to issue a new CDP for a project that has not been modified to address the substantial issues currently on appeal to the Coastal Commission. But possibly more important, I am opposed to issuing a new CDP for a revised project when the revisions not only fail to address the substantial issues on appeal to the Coastal Commission, but in fact exacerbate the inconsistencies with the City's own Local Coastal Program. Finally, I reserve the right to raise new issues in regard to the new CDP until after the final CDP language, and accompanying Staff Report and Findings, are made available to the public. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Fran Gibson 1521 McGee Avenue Berkeley, CA 94703 510.647.9903 2 Esparza, Patty From: DanHytrek@aol.com Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 1:48 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination Project Dear City Council - Thank you to those of you who voted to certify the SEIR for the Desalination Project on September 7th. I urge you to approve the Project's Local Coastal Development Permit on September 20th. As a registered voter in Huntington Beach, approval of this project is very important to me, and it demonstrates Huntington Beach's responsible planning for its water supply. Sincerely, Dan Hytrek 16561 Kettler Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Sept. 19,2010 Mr. &Mrs.Leslie L.Jepsen Sandy Hook Dr. 2919SEP20 P111 2*- 56 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Joan L. Flynn,City Clerk U City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St., 2d Floor Huntington Beach,CA 92648 To the Huntington Beach City Council: As longtime residents of the Seabury Tract,(near the intersection of Hamilton Ave.and Newland St.),we're extremely concerned about the proposed Poseidon desalination plant and its likely impact on our community, quality of life,and property value. Our concerns, listed below,are not simply a reiteration of the negative impacts of such a project on wildlife and our natural resources.Nor do they repeat the obvious concerns for our city's finances based on Poseidon's past questionable business dealings. Those dangers are well-documented already.Rather,the following are some of our concerns regarding the proposed desalination plants impact on men,women,and children--the citizens of Huntington Beach. First of all,we have concerns about the high capacity,4-foot"force main"pipeline: • How much damage will pipeline construction, including dewatering,cause to properties along the 10-mile route?The trench for the pipe alone will be 9 to 25 feet deep,and the water table is as shallow as 4 feet. Homeowners near Bushard,whose homes were wrecked several years ago by dewatering during a sewer line replacement,have still not been compensated. • Who would take financial responsibility should damage occur to homes or other property during the pipeline construction and dewatering process?Would the"responsible party"be Poseidon,which carries a B+rating and a track record of skipping town and leaving taxpayers holding the bag?Or would it be the City of Huntington Beach,which,like the rest of California,is strapped for cash? • Once in place,a pipeline of this capacity would normally have a tendency to vibrate, likely causing damage to adjacent properties. • What will be the impact on the flood control channels as the new pipeline undercuts them? Other concerns include,but are not limited to the following... • Poseidon would store poisonous chemicals not far from our homes, including a 1,000 gallon ammonia tank and a storage facility for various water treatment chemicals. Also,some of these chemicals would be trucked in and out past homes. • Poseidon offers to dampen noise from the plant to keep it below 50 or 55 dbA in nearby residential areas. So rather than hearing the ocean from our windows,we will now hear the sounds of the desalination plant, at roughly the normal listening volume of a television set. 61 A0 Ao-te) /6 C _ZL;__Z - Y_V 8 • If the desalination plant goes online,it will encourage the continued operations(and perhaps expanded activity)of the antiquated and polluting AES power plant. • Additional industrial development would create further blight in what is primarily a residential and tourism area. Surely,we have better uses for our coastal areas?If a desalination plant is going to be built,it should be near the communities that will receive the majority of the water. • According to a recent report from Food&Water Watch("Desalination:An Ocean of Problems,")"The portion of the water that reaches the customer contains unregulated chemicals not present in normal drinking water,which endanger the public health.These contaminants include chemicals such as endocrine disruptors,pharmaceuticals,personal care products,and toxins from marine algae." • The E.I.R.does not address the fact that the proposed plant site is immediately adjacent to the ASCON- NESI California Superfund toxic waste site.Nor does it account for the potential environmental effects of the years-long cleanup process currently underway. • Water tanks,pipelines,and chemical storage facilities will all be built on top of earthquake faults(notably the South Branch Fault), in an area known for its high liquefaction risk. This seems to present a number of unacceptable risks., According to an article entitled"Environmental Issues of Desalination" in the Journal of Contemporary Water Research&Education(Issue 132,Dec.2005),"If planners place a desalination plant in densely populated areas,it may impact the residential environment.Some desalination plants generate noise and gas emissions.For example, reverse osmosis plants generate noise because of the use of high-pressure pumps... Desalination plants can also have an indirect impact on the environment because many plants receive energy from the local grid... The burning of fossil fuels and increased energy consumption allows more air pollution... There is also concern regarding the large amounts of chemicals stored at the plants.Chemical spill risks require storing chemicals away from residential areas As the aforementioned Food&Water Watch report put it,"Ocean desalination is not a safe or affordable drinking water option... Private speculators are trying to push desalination plants across the country,... No community should consider desalination until all conservation options are fully evaluated and implemented." And even if desalination proves,someday,to be our only option for meeting water needs,southeastern Huntington Beach would still be the wrong place to put the plant and pipelines. This proposed desalination plant has too many problems associated with it,and the under-$2 million that would be collected by the City is simply not worth destroying communities and homes. Thank you for the opportunity to voice some of our concerns. Sincerely, Leslie L. and Susan R.Jepsen Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:16 AM To: Esparza, Patty Cc: Broeren, Mary Beth;jmckinley@poseidon1.com Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:55 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Desalination Project From: Robert Kramer [ma i Ito:rkramer@pacificinsulation.com] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:47 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination Project Please vote to approve this project this evening, Thanks, Bob Kramer 4802 Curtis Circle, 92649 Esparza, Patty From: BLELANDB@aol.com Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 11:22 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: DESALINATIONi I think it is important that you support this project,we need all the fresh water we can get,BEN LELAND,huntington beach 9 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 7:52 AM To: Esparza, Patty Cc: Broeren, Mary Beth;jmckinley@poseidon1.com Subject: Poseidon LC From: Charlotte Masarik [mailto:charlottemasarik@cox.net] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 5:59 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: Opposition to Poseidon Desalination Plant in Huntington Beach TO: Huntington Beach City Council FROM: Alex and Charlotte Masarik DATE: September 16th, 2010 Via electronic mail: rramos@surfcity-hb.org RE: Adoption of Poseidon Ocean Desalination Coastal Development Permit - OPPOSE Dear Mayor Green & City Council Members: My husband and I oppose the City of Huntington Beach's issuance of a new CDP until the new issues raised by changes in the proposed project are resolved through an appropriate LCP amendment to allow the inconsistent use of the property, as well as the inclusion of mitigation of marine life from entrainment mandated in the City's Local Coastal Program. We believe in water conservation measures versus building a desalination facility by Poseidon in Huntington Beach because: • A Desalination plant requires a huge amount of costly energy to operate • The negative impact on marine life at water intake and outfall is enormous • There is a likely chance of water pollution • The extremely high cost of building these plants, with the enormous expense of operation and maintenance, is excessive • Most of the power for desalination comes from burning coal, oil, and other fossil fuels • The estimated 200-250 million pounds of carbon dioxide the plant will emit has not been mitigated • To privatize water and permit Poseidon to sell water at a profit to other California Water Districts is inherently wrong We hope that you will take our voice into consideration and listen to us over Big Business interests and safeguard our coastal waters for the future of our children and their children by denying the issuance of a new CDP. Finally, we reserve the right to raise new issues in regard to the new CDP until after the final CDP language, and accompanying Staff Report and Findings, are made available to the public. Thank you. Sincerely, Charlotte& Al;ex Masarik 761 Oak Street Laguna Beach, Ca 92651 949-494-1630 Land 949-295-8040 Mobile char lottemasari k@cox.net 2 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:12 AM To: Esparza, Patty Cc: Broeren, Mary Beth;jmckinley@poseidon1.com Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 8:26 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: From: Means, Edward [mailto:EMeans@PIRNIE.COM] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 6:11 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Dear Councilmembers, I would like to thank you for your leadership in certifying the SEIR for the Huntington Beach Desalination Plant on Sept 7th. This project is an important element of water supply reliability for Huntington Beach, Orange County and Southern California. As an ex Metropolitan Water District manager (18yrs including positions of Chief Operating Officer and Acting General Manager) I urge you to finalize local approvals needed for project construction at your Monday night meeting. Thank you, Ed Means Ed Means Vice President Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 8001 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1100 Irvine, CA 92618 (949) 450-7921 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 4:16 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: FW: Poseidon LC From: Eileen Murphy [mailto:murphyeileen555@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:45 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: RE: Adoption of Poseidon Ocean Desalination Coastal Development Permit—OPPOSE TO: Huntington Beach City Council September 16, 2010 Dear Mayor Green & City Council Members: I am writing to oppose the adoption of the proposed Coastal Development Permit(CDP) for the Poseidon Ocean Desalination facility. For the following reasons 1.The current Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 was appealed to the California Coastal Commission in 2006 for numerous violations of the City's certified Local Coastal Program. The several appeals by citizens and public interest organizations, as well as Coastal Commissioners, were found to have raised substantial issues. These findings by the Coastal Commission triggered a requirement by the Coastal Commission to hold a subsequent hearing to resolve the issues raised in the several appeals. Incidentally,the City of Huntington Beach did not object to the Coastal Commission finding that the appeals raised substantial issues. However, neither the City nor the Applicant, Poseidon Resources, has taken any steps to resolve the issues. I oppose the City's issuance of a new CDP for the project before resolving the substantial issues raised in the outstanding appeals. 2. The proposed project changes demand a Tentative Parcel Map to configure the several parcels on the site to accommodate moving the proposed facility. This alteration in the proposed project only exacerbates the outstanding substantial issue questioning whether an industrial use of the property is consistent with the land use designation and restrictions for"Public" uses. A change to the current designation of the property as "Public" is necessary before allowing an inconsistent industrial use on the site. This necessary change in the land use designation mandates an amendment to the City's certified Local Coastal Program before issuing a new CDP for the changes in site location. 3.,The changes in the project description include a provision for operating the ocean desalination proposed project as a "stand alone" facility. That is, in contrast to the existing CDP approved by the City (and on appeal to the Coastal Commission), the new CDP would allow the project to withdraw seawater through the existing power plant infrastructure after the power plant discontinues use of that infrastructure. Again, this simply exacerbates marine life mortality through entrainment and the finding of the Coastal Commission that the current CDP raised substantial issue in regard to compliance with the City's LCP. I am opposed to issuing a new CDP for a revised project when the revisions not only fail to address the substantial issues on appeal to the Coastal Commission, but in fact exacerbate the inconsistencies with the City's own Local Coastal Program. Finally, I reserve the right to raise new issues in regard to the new CDP until after the final CDP language, and accompanying Staff Report and Findings, are made available to the public. . Respectfully submitted, Eileen Murphy 201 21 street HB CA 92648 2 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:11 AM To: Esparza, Patty Cc: Broeren, Mary Beth;jmckinley@poseidon1.com Subject: FW: Encouragement to Vote in Favor From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 8:25 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Encouragement to Vote in Favor From: Julie Ann [mailto:jamuzzall@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 10:50 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Encouragement to Vote in Favor Dear Huntington Beach City Council, I would like to thank you for certifying the SEIR on Sept 7th and would like to encourage you to finish the job by voting Monday night in favor of the final local approvals needed for project construction! My Aunt and Uncle, Bill and Julia Schryer were long time residents of Huntington Beach, and as a small child in the mid-194O's, I spent many long hours at the beach with them. However, one of my most favorite memories is playing in the sprinklers (Water! Water!) at their house. In my own personal and memorable way I am so pleased to think Huntington Beach will be building this important project. Thank You. Sincerely, Julie Ann Muzzall 9/ ) Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:19 AM To: Esparza, Patty Cc: Broeren, Mary Beth;jmckinley@poseidon1.com Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:18 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Desal project From: margaretnerio@aol.com [mailto:margaretnerio@aol.com] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:14 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desal project Dear Counciil Persons, I support the Deal project by Poisiden. Our water rationsing for gardens show that we need this project. Please approve this project. Margaret nerio -416 Esparza, Patty From: Ipau1193 [Ipau1193@earth1ink.net] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 11:31 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination Projec Importance: High Thank you for certifying the SEIR on Sept 7th. As Huntington Beach residents, we strongly urge you to vote in favor of the final local approvals needed for project construction. Thank you, Mr. &Mrs. Leonard Paul 16571 Mytinger Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Esparza, Paity From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:39 AM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: FW: Poseidon LC From: Donald Schulz [mailto:surfdad@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 6:01 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: TO: Huntington Beach City Council FROM: Don Schulz P.E. M. ASCE DATE: September 15, 2010 RE: Adoption of Poseidon Ocean Desalination Coastal Development Permit—OPPOSE Via electronic mail: rramosAsurfcit. -hb.org Dear Mayor Green& City Council Members: I am writing as a member of the Organization of Regional Coastal Activists (ORCA) and member of the Environmental Stakeholder Coalition to oppose the adoption of the proposed Coastal Development Permit (CDP) for the Poseidon Ocean Desalination facility. First Cause for Opposition The current Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 was appealed to the California Coastal Commission in 2006 for numerous violations of the City's certified Local Coastal Program. The several appeals by citizens and public interest organizations, as well as Coastal Commissioners, were found to have raised substantial issues. These findings by the Coastal Commission triggered a requirement by the Coastal Commission to hold a subsequent hearing to resolve the issues raised in the several appeals. Importantly, the City of Huntington Beach did not object to the Coastal Commission finding that the appeals raised substantial issues. However, neither the City nor the Applicant, Poseidon Resources, has taken any steps to resolve the issues. We oppose the City's issuance of a new CDP for the project before resolving the substantial issues raised in the outstanding appeals. Second Related Cause for Opposition Further, the recent changes to the project do not resolve the substantial issues raised in the several appeals, but in fact only serve to exacerbate the issues. First, the proposed project changes demand a Tentative Parcel Map to configure the several parcels on the site to accommodate moving the proposed facility. This alteration in the proposed project only exacerbates the outstanding substantial issue questioning whether an industrial use of the property is consistent with the land use designation and restrictions for"Public"uses. A change to the current designation of the property as "Public" is necessary before allowing an inconsistent industrial use on the site. This necessary change in the land use designation mandates an amendment to the City's certified Local Coastal Program before issuing a new CDP for the changes in site location. Also, the changes in the project description include a provision for operating the ocean desalination proposed project as a"stand alone" facility. That is, in contrast to the existing CDP approved by the City (and on appeal to the Coastal Commission), the new CDP would allow the project to withdraw seawater through the existing power plant infrastructure after the power plant discontinues use of that infrastructure. Again, this simply exacerbates marine life mortality through entrainment and the finding of the Coastal Commission that the current CDP raised substantial issue in regard to compliance with the City's LCP. We oppose the City's issuance of a new CDP until the new issues raised by changes in the proposed project are resolved through an appropriate LCP amendment to allow the inconsistent use of the property, as well as the inclusion of mitigation of marine life from entrainment mandated in the City's Local Coastal Program. CONCLUSION In brief,we are opposed to the City Council issuing a new Coastal Development Permit to replace an existing permit that has been appealed to the Coastal Commission and found to raise substantial issues before those appealable issues are resolved. It would be inconsistent with your duty to enforce your own Local Coastal Program to issue a new CDP for a project that has not been modified to address the substantial issues currently on appeal to the Coastal Commission. But possibly more importantly, we are opposed to issuing a new CDP for a revised project when the revisions not only fail to address the substantial issues on appeal to the Coastal Commission, but in fact exacerbate the inconsistencies with the City's own Local Coastal Program. Finally, we reserve the right to raise new issues in regard to the new CDP until after the final CDP language, and accompanying Staff Report and Findings, are made available to the public. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Don Schulz Member ORCA 2 Esparza, Patty From: Mike.Tasker[Mike.tasker@verizon.net] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:28 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Huntington Beach Desalination Project On behalf of my family, thank you all for certifying the SEIR on Sept 7th. Please finish the job by voting Monday night in favor of the final local approvals needed for project construction! Our future water resources depends on it. Regards, Mike Tasker q �ho rYl Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:10 AM To: Esparza, Patty Cc: Broeren, Mary Beth;jmckinley@poseidon1.com Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 8:23 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Desalination Plant From: Bruce West [mailto:ecurbeast@socal.rr.com] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 11:49 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination Plant Thank you for your efforts on the Poseidon project. I am afraid that the real work is yet to begin with the State. Some officials are of the opinion that they know"what's best for you". I won't mention names, but the Speaker of the US House and our Lieutenant Governor come to mind. Good luck and godspeed, we need this done asap. Bruce West 6742 Gate Hill Circle Huntington Beach 1 i OR AN G E C O U N T Y �I®low CnA STKEEPER EDUCATION/ADVOCACY/RESTORATION/ENFORCEMENT 3151 Airway Avenue,Suite F-110 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone 714-850-1965 Fax 714-850-1592 tXlPl,cirP cxrxrxr('n]CY�rPP1lPr nrcr September 20, 2010 Via Hand Delivery RECEIVED FROM City Council AS PUBLIC RECOR�DfOR cm IL MEET City of Huntington Beach OF -9;��_ ..�'«---� 2000 Main Street GIN CLERK OFFICE Huntington Beach, CA 92648 JOAN L.FLYNK CITY CLERK RE: Comments on Coastal Development Permit(CDP)No. 10-014 for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Dear Mayor Green and City Council Members, Orange County Coastkeeper ("Coastkeeper") is an environmental organization with the mission to preserve, protect and restore the watersheds and coastal environment of Orange County. On behalf of the members of Coastkeeper, our organization encourages the Huntington Beach City Council not to adopt CDP No. 10-014. Following the approval of CDP No. 02-05 nearly four (4) years ago, two (2) appeals were made to the California Coastal Commission ("Coastal Commission") where staff determined SUBSTANTIAL ISSUES EXISTED with respect to the project's consistency with specific and multiple sections of the City of Huntington Beach's Local Coastal Plan("LCP"). Coastkeeper was one appellant, while Residents for Responsible Desalination, Surfrider Foundation, and Commissioners Mike Reilly and Mary Shallenberger constituted the other appellants. The deficiencies of CDP No. 02-05 are repeated in CDP No. 10-014 and the City Council should NOT APPROVE this flawed CDP. The aforementioned appeal to CDP No. 02-05 identified substantial issues that have not been adequately resolved in CDP No. 10-014 and the deficiencies are detailed accordingly: LCP § C.1.1 : "Ensure the adverse impacts associated with coastal zone development are mitigated or minimized to the greatest extent feasible" The proposed Poseidon Resources project is inconsistent with LCP Objective § C.1.1 because the mitigation required by the city fails to adequately address many of the adverse impacts associated with this specific development to the greatest extent feasible. As Coastal Commission staff reported in their response to Appeal # A-5-HNB-06-101 (City of Huntington Beach approval of Poseidon Resources desalination facility), the project will"cause adverse impacts to coastal resources, including water quality degradation, loss of marine organisms, and others." Unlike the existing AES facility, Poseidon Resources facility will "operate 24 hours, seven days a week." (Approve Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 10-01 —Attachment 2— September 7, 2010 EPA Staff Report, pg 4). The increased operation of existing once-through-cooling intake infrastructure in order to supply the source water for desalination without taking into account the state mandated scheduled phase-out of once-through-cooling by the AES facility or reducing impingement and entrainment makes this CDP application deficient. In addition to severe inconsistencies between the proposed project and LCP Objective § C.1.1 regarding impingement and entrainment for a collocated facility, CDP No. 10-014 is deficient in its mitigation measures for growth inducement, the adverse impacts to the marine environment from a "stand-alone" desalination facility, the release of potentially toxic cleaning solution from the filtration system, and the release of brine to the marine ecosystem. LCP § C 1.2.3 : "Prior to the issuance of a development entitlement, the City shall make the finding that adequate services (i.e., water, sewer, roads, etc.) can be provided to serve the proposed development, consistent with policies contained in the Coastal Element, at the time of occupancy." The Poseidon Resources project is inconsistent with this section due mainly to the fact that a concrete pipeline route has not been established. Coastal Commission staff has held among the services necessary to support a desalination facility is the connection to a water distribution system. The failure to establish an identified pipeline route, which may require permits from entities such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers if passage over the Santa Ana River is required, precludes an analysis of additional impacts which could require supplemental environmental review. Until a water distribution pipeline has been identified and a thorough analysis has been made, there is inadequate basis for the finding of LCP conformity with the plan and Section C 1.2.3. LCP § C. 3.1 "Preserve, protect and enhance, where feasible, existing public recreation sites in the Coastal Zone. " The operation of the Poseidon Resources desalination plant in Huntington Beach will adversely impact the marine and coastal environment through high salinity discharges and increased fish mortality. The decreased recreational fishing resources, and the prevention of enhanced fishing resources following the planned phasing out of the existing AES once-through cooling infrastructure reduces the desirability of the area for recreation. The LCP objective clearly calls for protecting or enhancing recreation and permitting the continued use of this antiquated and environmentally harmful technology runs directly counter with this objective. When determining the project's conformity with this section of the LCP, city staff concluded the project's consistency with the objective because"fishes with high commercial or recreational importance are very uncommon in the intake source water." (Finding 1(f)). The finding fails to consider known adverse impacts caused by the intake source water infrastructure as acknowledged by U.S. EPA, the California Ocean Protection Council, the California State Lands Commission, the State Water Resources Control Board, the California Energy Commission, the Governor's Ocean Action Plan, and others, that the infrastructure, among other harm, causes "damage to critical aquatic organisms, including important elements of the food chain"', "significantly harms the environment by killing large number of fish and other wildlife, larvae and eggs,"2 and California maintains as its goal an increase in the abundance and diversity of our oceans which is inconsistent with the continued use of once-through cooling. 1 Resolution of the California Ocean Protection Council Regarding the Use of Once-Through Cooling Technologies in Coastal Waters,California Ocean Protection Council,Adopted April 20,2006. 2 Resolution by the California State Lands Commission Regarding Once-Through Cooling in California Power Plants,California State Lands Commission,Adopted April 17,2006. 3 Governor's Ocean Action Plan. LCP § C 6.1.2 : "Marine Resources shall be maintained, enhanced, and where feasible, restored. Special protection shall be given to areas ofspecial biological or economic significance." The CDP failed to properly implement this policy when it concluded the project complied with the LCP because the project will not maintain, enhance or restore the marine resources of Huntington Beach. This is concisely shown in finding 1(m)of the CDP which states the project's approval"would not increase the volume or velocity of the existing Huntington Beach Generating Station cooling water intake" system. Assuming this assertion is intended to prove Huntington Beach's marine resources are being '`maintained" ignores the fact that the frequency of operation for the system would increase from the existing and infrequent demand from the AES plant to that of Poseidon, which would be twenty-four(24) hour, seven (7) days per week. This statement is misleading relating to impingement and implies, along with the statement that the "estimated average daily impingement of 0.9 pounds per day, which is less than the daily diet of one brown [pelican]," that the environmental harm caused by once-through cooling is less than significant and that marine resources are being "maintained." The CDP appears inconsistent with this section of the LCP. LCP § C 6.1.3 : "Uses of the marine environment shall be carried out in a manner that will sustain the biological productivity of coastal waters and that will maintain healthy populations of all species of marine organisms adequate for long-term commercial, recreational, scientific, and educational purposes." The Poseidon Resources project will result in harm to the marine biota off the Huntington Beach coast partially caused by the continued use of once-through cooling technology scheduled to be phased out in the near future which has proven to be a large scale hazard to coastal fish and marine species. Mitigation for the continued use of a known hazardous and antiquated technology was incomplete and is inconsistent with the LCP. LCP §C 6.1.1 : "Require that new development include mitigation measures to enhance water quality, if feasible; and at a minimum, prevent the degradation of water quality of groundwater basins, wetlands, and surface water. " The proposed Poseidon Resources project would introduce relatively large quantities of cleaning solution from the membrane cleansing process on a regular frequency the cumulative effects of which are unknown. Mitigation for the effects of these toxins (such as sulfuric acid) and pollutants (increased salinity), as well as an inadequate assessment of measures to enhance water quality makes the CDP inconsistent with the City's certified LCP. LCP § C 6.1.12 : `Periodically review the City's policies on water conservation, including the Water Conservation Ordinance, to ensure the use of state of the art conservation measures for new development and redevelopment, and retrofitting of existing development, where feasible and appropriate, to implement these measures." This LCP provision is evidence of a municipal effort for new development to sue state of the art conservation measures the application of which is inconclusive in its application to the proposed Poseidon Resources project. LCP § C 6.6.19 : "Prior to the approval of any new or expanded seawater pumping facilities, require the provision of maximum feasible mitigation measures to minimize damage to marine organisms due to entrainment in accordance with state and federal law." The proposed Poseidon Resources project will require the installation of new seawater pumping facilities for use in the desalination process. The suggested CDP findings related to this provision state the application of CEQA significance thresholds results in a fording of no significant adverse impacts due to the operation of the pumps and therefore mitigation is not required. The findings are inconsistent with the express written declaration of the section and it is the approval of any new seawater pumping facility, not an inapplicable CEQA significance determination, that triggers marine organism mitigation for entrainment to the maximum extent feasible. The approval of the proposed Poseidon Resources project will increase the need for seawater pumping beyond that currently used by the existing AES Huntington Beach Generating Station and will cause a greater entrainment problem. A twenty-four (24) hour, seven (7) day a week desalination facility will require more electricity and once-through cooling infrastructure demand for use in brine dilution and desalination purposes than the infrastructure is currently used by a frequently "offline" power plant. Additionally, the CDP's findings in 1(r)relating to the damage caused by once-through cooling and that entrainment is "substantially less than significant" and "impacts on marine organisms resulting from the project are relatively small" is inconsistent with the holdings of multiple statewide regulatory agencies which have held the cumulative impact of once-through cooling technology has reached the point where agencies, such as the State Lands Commission, refuse to approve leases for new, re-powering, or extensions or amendments of existing leases for existing power facilities whose operations include once- through cooling. Pursuant to this logic, and the statement by Coastal Commission staff that the "LCP does not exempt new pumps based on...whether they would alter existing uses"(Staff Report -March 23, 2006), the current CDP is inadequate to ensure the project conforms to this LCP provision. In conclusion, Coastkeeper appreciates the effort the City Council and its staff have put towards this project and encourage you to VOTE NO and only adopt a CDP that complies with the mandates of your LCP. We look forward to a constructive relationship with the City of Huntington Beach and hope our comments will assist in the development of a thoughtful and progressive planning and adoption process. Sincerely, sx4m Garry Brown Executive Director Orange County Coastkeeper Council/Age eting Held:9 Q /'7/o-✓30 Deferred ontmued to: 9�?��/D ,�A proved ❑ Conditionally Ap oved ❑ De nie �Nd&o tyAz rk's nature Council Meeting Date: September 7, 2010 Department ID Number: PL10-020 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Administrator PREPARED BY: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Building SUBJECT- Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-130 to amend Condiitonal Use Permit (CUP) No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 02-05 by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans,. and building elevations for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration are Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-130 which pertain to the Seawater Desalination Project. EPA No. 10-001 is a request by Poseidon Resources Corporation to amend Conditional Use Per,nit No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 approved by City Council in 2006 by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project, GPM No. 10-130 is an accompanying request to subdivide three parcels totaling ± 10.z5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project. Staff is rec:ornmending approval of the project with modifications. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Recommended Action: Motion to: A) Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 i.o permit the Seawater Desalination Project with staff recommended findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No. 1); and, B) Approve CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts with a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attachment No. 2). -253- Item 5. - Page I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 Alternative Action(s): The City Council-may make the following alternative motion(s): , a) "Deny Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 with findings for denial." b) "Continue Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 and direct staff accordingly." Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Poseidon Resources Corporation, 17011 Beach Blvd., Suite 940, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Property Owners: AES HB, LLC, 21730 Newland St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646; City of-- Huntington Beach, 2000 Main St., Huntington Beach, CA 92648; Various_ for off site improvements. Location: 21730 Newland (east side of Newland, south of Edison Ave.) and pipeline routes (Primary Route - along Newland, Hamilton, Brookhurst, and Adams and Alternative Routes —further north along Newland, Brookhurst, and Warner) Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 represents a request pursuant to Section 241.18 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 approved by City Council in 2006 that allowed the construction and operation of a seawater desalination project by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project. Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 represents a request pursuant to Chapter 251 of the HBZSO to subdivide three parcels totaling ± 19.5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project. In comparison to the previously approved plans, the revised plans now reflect: The project being sited north of the previously approved location by incorporating the adjacent city tank site in addition to AES property to create an ±8.6 acre parcel; ■ The proposed 30 foot tall water storage tank is still in the same location as previously approved on the corner of Newland and Edison on a ±3.5 acre parcel; - The project's architectural design has changed slightly but is comparable to the previous approval and incorporates the same colors, though an exterior finish system (i.e. stucco appearance) has been eliminated; and ■ Revised height and size (still in compliance with the HBZSO) for some structures as noted in the following matrix listing all proposed structures including a comparison to the previously approved project: Item 5. - Page 2 -254- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 2005 2010 Architecture Architecture Ht. Ht. Area ft) Area(SF) (ft) (SF) BUILDINGS SOLIDS HANDLING AND BUILDING 21' 7,590 25' 1 1,760 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 18, 10,120 20' 5,000 R.O. BUILDING 25' 38,090 35' 34,727 ELECTRICAL BUILDING 12' 900 35' 4,840 SUBTOTAL BUILDINGS 56,700 46,327 TANKS AND STRUCTURES OUTDOOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Substation 12' 900 12' 23,541 • (19,6 • Switch Gear (960) • Transformers (2,176) • Product Water Pump Station (805) Electrical PRETREATMENT FILTER STRUCTURE 16' 38,270 28' 59,550 CHEMICAL STORAGE TANKS & 23' 4,368 CARBON DIOXIDE TANKS 8' 1,482 24' 2,100 FLUSH/WASH TANK 19, 1,590 23' 605 RINSE TANK 29' 491 -- -- PRODUCT WATER STORAGE TANK 30' 36,305 30' 49,481 AMMONIA/FLOURIDE STORAGE TANK 6' 28 12' 558 LIME SILOS 26' 4,560 -- -- INFLUENT PUMP STATION -- 1,880 20' 2,184 POST-TREATMENT TANKS -- -- 27' 5,250 PRODUCT WATER PUMP STATION -- 650 20' 4,176 SURGE TANK -- 312 14' 408 SUBTOTAL TANKS AND STRUCTURES 90,836 147,853 TOTAL BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES 147,536 194,180 The project still includes up to 10 miles of water transmission lines to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa. Two off-site underground booster pump stations and modifications to an existing booster pump station would be needed as part of this primary water transmission route. As part of the revised project the proposal now includes pipeline design variations and optional routes and pump stations that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options. The desalination project proposes to now either take screened seawater from the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) discharge pipeline or pump seawater as a stand alone facility using the HBGS intake pipeline, if the HBGS stops using once-through cooling, and purify it using reverse osmosis to produce drinking water. The project still proposes to use up to 100 MGD of seawater to produce 50 MGD of drinking water for use in Orange County. -255- Item 50 - Page 3 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 The-remaining 50 MGD of concentrated seawater will be blended with the remainder of the HBGS cooling water or with 52 MGD of dilution seawater in the stand alone condition and discharged via the existing HBGS outfall pipe extending approximately 1,500 feet offshore. Pipelines will still be constructed on the existing HBGS site to connect the proposed desalination project to the existing HBGS ocean intake and discharge pipeline. No changes are proposed to the coastal/marine portion of the existing-HBGS intake and outfall. As with the previously approved plans, an underground water transmission line will be constructed from the desalination project to the closest regional distribution line located in Costa Mesa. The segment located within Huntington Beach will be approximately four miles long, one mile of which will be within the Coastal Zone boundary, and will be located entirely within the existing public right-of-way along Newland Street, Hamilton Avenue and potentially Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue. The property where the various buildings, tanks, and other structures are proposed is presently developed with three 40-foot high fuel storage-tanks and a concrete containment berm. All three tanks as well as the interior portions of the 10 to 12 foot high concrete berm are proposed to be demolished to allow for the proposed structures. The site will be remediated to address any contamination from the previous use. The facilities will operate 24 hours, seven days a week and will have a total staff of 12 to 18 with shift size varying. The applicant has indicated that the request is necessary to provide a new water supply source into the area that is reliable and drought proof. The project's potential environmental impacts are analyzed and discussed in a separate staff report. Prior to any action on EPA No. 10-001 and TPM No. 10-130, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001. B. BACKGROUND In September 2005 the City Council certified Recirculated Environmental Impact Report No. 00-02 and in February 2006 approved Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04/Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 for the construction and operation of the seawater desalination project. The Coastal Development Permit is currently on appeal at the Coastal Commission. C. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: This analysis reviews the following aspects of the project: land use compatibility, site layout, circulation, street dedication/improvement, water transmission line, other project impacts, aesthetics, and benefits/disadvantages to the city. Land Use Compatibility Even with the proposed amendments the proposed use is still compatible and consistent with the properties immediately surrounding the subject site. To the north are various industrial uses extending to Hamilton Avenue, which provide a buffer to the residential area north of Hamilton located ±800 feet from the project. To the east are a 145-foot wide flood control Item 5. - Page 4 -256- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 channel and then the ASCON-NEST landfill and Magnolia tank farm. Further east are single- family residences across Magnolia Street located ±1,300 feet from the project. The closest residential uses are ±200 feet away and include the manufactured homes and RV Park across Newland to the west behind a vacant parcel. The wetlands to the southeast are separated by an existing concrete berm and a distance of±500 feet to the closest proposed desalination project structure. To the south of the project is the remainder of the HBGS which is compatible with the project. Site Layout The amended layout of the plant will not be detrimental to the area because it is still buffered by substantial distance (from ±200 to ±1,300 feet)from residential and other sensitive uses. The 30-foot high water reservoir tank, which will be the most visible of the structures proposed near the street frontages, is setback ±180 feet from the property line along Newland and ±80 feet from the property line along Edison Avenue. The rest of the proposed structures are located towards the east end of the property away from Newland and are setback ±100 feet from the east property line. Furthermore, facility operations under the amended plan will continue to be directed towards the interior of the site and will be screened from view by the existing perimeter concrete berm and the proposed landscaping and eight foot high wall. The proposed project and tentative-parcel map comply with the requirements of the PS-O-CZ (Public-Semipublic— Oil Production Overlay — Coastal Zone Overlay) zoning district (Attachment No. 3). Circulation, Street Dedication and Improvement Site access with the revised plan remains through the existing HBGS gated driveway off Newland. A minimum 24-foot wide access easement across the HBGS property and leading to the proposed structures and parcels is shown on the site plan. Parking areas next to the administration building and along the east side of the project provide 31 parking spaces and will be adequate to accommodate staff members and guests. The parking layout has proper circulation and the proposed parking spaces and drive aisle widths meet code. The loading area is separated from the main access aisle and the parking lot and is of adequate size to accommodate all truck operations. To improve circulation in the area the applicant will still be required to dedicate and improve 12 feet of property along the project frontage on Edison Avenue for street widening. Off-site Water Transmission Lines The project continues to include the construction of a water transmission line from the desalination project to the closest regional distribution line located in Costa Mesa. The segment located within Huntington Beach will be approximately four miles long and will be located entirely within the existing public right-of-way along Newland Street, Hamilton Avenue and potentially Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue. As part of the revised project the proposal now includes pipeline design variations and optional routes and pump stations that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options. To minimize any detrimental impacts to the community and to maintain access to the coast and public recreation areas during construction as required by the Coastal Act, the Public Works Department will require the applicant to prepare traffic control plans to mitigate -257- Item 5e - Page 5 -REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 impacts to city streets and facilitate circulation during construction. A franchise agreement will also be required for use of the city's right-of-way. Other Project Components The SEIR notes that the stationary noise sources from the project include various water pumps and air conditioning system components. However, the majority of these noise sources is located indoors or is provided with enclosures to dampen noise. Additionally, intervening structures such as the concrete berm and proposed wall combined with significant setbacks will further reduce noise impacts. A mitigation measure has also been identified which requires the applicant to monitor noise levels of stationary noise sources and retain an acoustical engineer to install additional noise attenuation measures to comply with the city's noise ordinance. The desalination plant will be using chemicals in its operations both to clean the reverse osmosis membranes and to treat the potable product water. The project will incorporate leak and containment measures to minimize any risk to employees and the surroundings. All chemicals will be stored in-concrete containment structures with a 110 percent spill containment capacity. The transportation of chemicals to the desalination plant will be conducted by registered haulers and is required to comply with all Caltrans regulations. The plant is also required to develop hazardous waste management and safety plans pursuant to Occupational Health-and Safety Association (OSHA) and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements. The Fire Department will also require the applicant to submit for their approval a complete chemical inventory and a use, storage, and handling plan prepared by a qualified professional. The applicant has demonstrated that the project will not create any noticeable odors. The applicant is required to obtain a permit to operate from the Air Quality Management District and will continue to be regulated by the agency to address this issue. Aesthetics The project will improve the appearance of the area by demolishing three existing 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and replacing them with lower profile, modern, and more attractive structures. The amended proposed structures vary in height with the maximum height being 35 feet which still complies with the HBZSO. The amended structures are at minimum 5 feet lower than the existing 40-foot high tanks. Furthermore, the bottom portion of these structures will be hidden behind the existing concrete berm along the perimeter. As noted before, the proposed structures are in substantial compliance with the Design Guidelines by employing variations in form, building details, colors, and materials that create visual interest. The design is carried through all the structures including the architectural screen for the tanks to achieve a unified theme. The perimeter wall is designed in a manner to create an attractive appearance and will be consistent with the wall design approved for the portion of the HBGS property to the south for a cohesive appearance. The installation of a 10 foot and 20 foot deep planter along the project street frontage on Edison and Newland respectively will further improve the appearance of the project. The amended design, colors, and materials of the project have Item 5. - Page 6 -258- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 been reviewed and are recommended for approval by the Design Review Board with minor modifications as reflected in the recommended conditions of approval. Benefits and Disadvantages To The City The following (not listed necessarily in order of importance) would be potential benefits to City from the proposed project, with generally-estimated values provided: 1. Additional ocean water quality testing required since water will be a source of the public drinking water supply [value = intrinsic] 2. Improved appearance and remediation of the immediate site by replacement of oil storage tanks and containment berms with an architecturally-enhanced and landscaped facility [value = intrinsic] 3. Water supply benefits from connecting Poseidon's pipeline to the City's water system downstream of the City's MWD meter may allow the City to avoid MWD surcharges. [value = $300,000/year based on $55/acre-foot surcharges and 15 acre-feet/day] 4. Emergency source of dependable, alternative ("drought-proof") potable water supply [value = intrinsic] 5. Diversification of City's water supply portfolio through Poseidon's connection to City's system, making product water potentially available when MWD sources are rationed or curtailed under severe drought or other service discontinuances [value = $3,000/day of curtailment based on $205/acre-foot Basin Equity Assessment and 15 acre-feet/day] 6. If a joint-use reservoir were to be negotiated: a. Water storage at the City's master planned 10 million gallon capacity to serve primarily the southeast area of the City [value = intrinsic] b. Reduced size of, or elimination of, reservoir booster pump station due to Poseidon's high-pressure discharge to the City's (jointly-owned with Mesa Consolidated Water District) MWD pipeline (OC-44) [value = $4 million avoided construction costs + $15,000/year O&M savings + $25,000/year energy savings] c. Reduced construction cost of master planned water storage reservoir by potentially transferring some or all construction costs to developer [value = $1 million per million gallons of capacity] 7. Franchise payments for company's use of City's street rights-of-way for company's pipeline and connection to City's (jointly-owned with Mesa Consolidated Water District) MWD pipeline (OC-44) [value = to be negotiated] -259- Item 5e - Page 7 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 8. New City tax revenues without significant new demands on City services [value = $50,000/year utility tax revenue to City + $1,200,000/year revenue to RDA + -$62,500/year property tax revenue to City + $400,000/year housing set aside to RDA] (based on $200,000,000 construction cost estimate) The project has the following disadvantage to the city: It will cause a temporary disruption to city streets during the construction process. The analysis of the project indicates that the proposed advantages to the city outweigh the disadvantages because the project will result in much needed improvements to the aesthetics of the area. Additionally, the proposed use conforms to the General--Plan-Land Use and zoning designations on the subject site which permits utilities like the desalination plant. D. SUMMARY Staff recommends that the City Council approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 1-0-001 to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 subject to conditions based on the following: The proposed amendment is compatible with surrounding uses and is buffered from residential and other sensitive uses by significant setbacks, perimeter landscaping, and fencing. The project will improve the appearance of the area by demolishing three existing unused 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and replacing them with lower profile, modern, and more attractive structures. ® The proposed structures are in substantial compliance with the Design Guidelines by employing varied building form, architectural details, and colors that create visual interest. The design is carried through all the structures including the architectural screen for the tanks to achieve a unified theme. This coupled with the 10 foot (Edison) to 20 foot (Newland) perimeter landscape planter and screen wall will enhance the overall appearance of the site compared to the existing condition. 9 The project will advance the remediation of any contamination around the unused fuel storage tanks. ■ All other impacts pertaining to noise, light/glare, odors, and use of chemicals are addressed to avoid detrimental impacts to the area. ® The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of P (Public) for the site. The project is consistent with General Plan and Coastal Element goals, objectives, and policies. ■ The project conforms to the requirements of the Coastal Zone Overlay and will not impede access to the coast or any public recreation opportunities in the area. The proposed parcels comply with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Item 5. - Page 8 -260- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 Environmental Status: The project's potential environmental impacts are analyzed and discussed in a separate staff report. Prior to any action on EPA No. 10-001 and TPM No. 10-130, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 10- 001. Staff recommends that SEIR No. 10-001 be certified as adequate and complete with mitigation measures,-Findings and Facts, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Although the project results in an adverse impact to the environment in relation to short-term construction related emissions and growth inducement outside of Orange County-that cannot be fully mitigated or avoided, the City Council may still approve the project if a Statement of Overriding Considerations is adopted. CEQA requires decision makers-to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the City may consider the adverse environmental effects acceptable. In this particular case, staff believes the social, economic, and-- ecosystem/biological resources benefits of the proposed project outweigh the adverse impacts to air quality during the construction process as well as possible growth inducement outside of Orange County. The project benefits are outlined in the Statement of Overriding Considerations (see Attachment No. 2). As a point of reference, the unavoidable significant impact in regards to short-term construction related emissions is also found in the Environmental Impact Report for other city approved projects such as the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan, The Strand (Blocks 104/105), Home Depot, and Walmart. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is the formal documentation required by CEQA to implement and monitor compliance with all mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program establishes which City departments are responsible for ensuring completion and compliance with all adopted mitigation measures. Following approval of the EPA and TPM, the City Council must approve CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts with a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attachment No. 2). Strategic Plan Goal: Maintain financial viability and our reserves -261- Item 50 - Page 9 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-020 Attachment(s): Docrip on 1. Findings and Conditions of Approval 2. CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts with Statement of Overriding Considerations — SEIR No. 10-001 3. Zoning Compliance Matrix 4. Site plans, floor plans, elevations, landscaping plan, and pipeline alignment dated August 12, 2010 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 dated August 11, 2010 5. Project Narrative dated August 11, 2010 6. Code Requirements List for informational purposes only. 7. PowerPoint Presentation Item 5. - Page 10 -262- ATTACHMENT # 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001/ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130: 1. Tentative Parcel Map (TPM)No. 10-130 to subdivide three parcels totaling+19.5 acres into four parcels is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property, or any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provisions of this Code. As modified by conditions and code requirements TPM No. 10-130 proposes four parcels that will comply with all requirements of the General Plan and Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance including, but not limited to, minimum lot size, lot width, and landscaping. The proposed parcels can adequately accommodate-development consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations on the parcels. 2. The site is physically suitable-for the type and density of development. As modified by conditions and code requirements the proposed parcels will comply with, among others, minimum lot size, lot width, and landscaping requirements within the PS (Public-Semipublic)zoning district. The proposed parcel configuration and topography are suitable for the proposed development. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat with the exception of significant unavoidable impacts relating to short term construction air quality impacts and growth inducing impacts outside of Orange County. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Council approves the tentative parcel map because Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR)No. 10-001 was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made that specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the SEIR. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. There are no public access or use easements within the proposed parcel map. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL —ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10- 001 (AMENDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 02-04): 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 approved by City Council in 2006 that allowed the construction and operation of a seawater desalination project by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The proposed project for the establishment, maintenance and operation of a seawater desalination project producing 50 million gallons of potable water per day which includes a 5,000 square foot administration building, 34,727 square foot reverse osmosis building, 49,481 square foot product water storage tank (30 foot high), Item 5e - Page 12-130 -264- Attachment No. 1.1 other related accessory structures; perimeter landscaping and fencing along the project's frontage on Newland Street and Edison Avenue; and up to four miles of water transmission lines for the primary route; and optional water transmission line routes that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The project will result in the demolition of three__40-foot high fuel storage tanks to be replaced with one 30 foot high water storage tank and lower profile-and modern structures with a more attractive-design consistent with the city's adopted Design Guidelines. The project will further enhance the appearance of the area with the installation of 10 to 20 feet of landscaping and an eight- foot high block wall along the Edison and Newland street frontages-respectively to provide additional screening and a_consistent and upgraded appearance in contrast to the existing improvements. The proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses. However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts. 2. The Entitlement Plan Amendment will be compatible with surrounding uses because the project as proposed and modified by the conditions imposed and code requirements is compatible with the properties immediately surrounding it which are primarily industrial in nature. Additionally, significant setbacks including Newland Street to the west, Edison Avenue to the north, the flood control channel to the east, an existing earthen berm, 10 to 20 feet of landscaping and an eight foot high block wall along the project's Edison and Newland street frontages provide additional screening from surrounding uses. Impacts pertaining to noise, light/glare, odors, and use of chemicals are also addressed to make the project compatible. The proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses. However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts. 3. The proposed seawater desalination project including a 5,000 square foot administration building, 34,727 square foot reverse osmosis building, 49,481 square foot product water storage tank, other miscellaneous accessory structures; perimeter landscaping and fencing along the project's frontage on Newland Street and Edison Avenue; and up to four miles of 48-54 inch water transmission lines within the city for the primary route; and optional water transmission line routes that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The project as proposed and modified by the conditions of approval is consistent with the PS-O-CZ (Public-Semipublic—Oil Production Overlay—Coastal Zone Overlay) zoning district, and meets or exceeds the minimum development standards set forth therein, and is allowed subject to approval of a conditional use permit and coastal development permit. The proposed desalination facility, which will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities. 4. The granting of the Entitlement Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property because it will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, and it is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities. The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan including, without limitation, the following goals and policies: EPA 10-001/TPM 10-130 -265- Item 5® - Page 13 a. Policy LU 4.1.1 (page II-LU-20): Require adherence to or consideration of the policies prescribed for Design and Development in this Plan, as appropriate. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable policies related to Design and Development. b. Policy LU 4.1.2 (page 11-LU-20): Require that an appropriate landscape plan be submitted and implemented for development projects subject to discretionary review. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to submit and implement a landscape plan. c. Policy LU 4.1.6 (page 11-LU-20): Require that commercial and industrial development incorporate adequate drought-conscious irrigation systems and maintain the health of the landscape. The project is consistent with this policy because the landscape plan includes drought-conscious irrigation systems. d. Policy LU 4.2.1 (page 11-LU-20): Require that all structures be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City's building and other pertinent codes and regulations; including new, adaptively re-used, and renovated buildings. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable requirements related to building codes and regulations. e. Policy LU 4.2.4 (page 11-LU-20): Require that all development be designed to provide adequate space for access, parking, supporting functions, open space, and other pertinent elements. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable policies and requirements related to access, parking, supporting functions and open space. f. Policy LU 4.2.5 (page II-LU-20): Require that all commercial, industrial, and public development incorporate appropriate design elements to facilitate access and use as required by state and federal laws such as the American's with Disabilities Act. The project is consistent with this policy because it is-required to adhere to all applicable policies and requirements related to accessibility. g. Policy LU 5.1.1 (page 11-LU-21): Require that development protect environmental resources by consideration of the policies and standards contained in the Environmental Resources/Conservation Element of the General Plan and federal (NEPA) and state (CEQA) regulations. During the development review process: (a) Review any development proposal for the Bolsa Chica area, Huntington Beach wetlands, and throughout the City to ensure that no development is permitted in federally delineated wetlands; and (b) Review any development proposed for non-wetland areas to ensure that appropriate setbacks and buffers are maintained between development and environmentally sensitive areas to protect habitat quality. Item vo - Page 14-130 -266- Attachment No. 1.3 The project is consistent with this policy because it does not propose any development in or adjacent to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitats, and provides for all required setbacks and buffers. h. Policy LU 7.1.1 (page II-LU-22): Accommodate existing uses and new development in accordance with the Land Use and Density Schedules. The project is consistent with this policy because it is consistent with the General Plan Land Use and Density Schedules. i. Policy LU 7.1.2 (page 11-LU-22): Require that development be designed to account for the unique characteristics of project sites and objectives for community character and in accordance with the Development "Overlay" Schedule (Table LU-3) as appropriate. The project is consistent with this policy because it is proposed on a site that is already developed and is integrated into the site. Pipelines are proposed to be routed in-existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. j. Policy LU 7.1.5 (page II-LU-22): Accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that maintain theCity's fiscal viability and integrity of environmental resources. The project is consistent with this policy because it proposes redevelopment on underutilized land for productive economic use. k. Policy LU 13.1.8 (page 11-LU-43): Ensure that the City's public buildings, sites, and infrastructure improvements are designed to be compatible in scale, mass, character, and architecture with existing buildings and pertinent design characteristics prescribed by this General Plan for the district or neighborhood in which they are located, and work with non-City public agencies to encourage compliance. The project is consistent with this policy because the project will be an improvement by demolishing three 40 foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. 1. Policy UD 2.1.1 (Page 11-UD-27): Require that new development be designed to consider coastal views in its massing,height, and site orientation. The project is consistent with this policy because the project plans include a number of measures to minimize adverse visual effects of the proposed facility. The facility would be comprised of relatively low profile buildings reaching approximately 35 feet above the existing grade, which would comply with applicable zoning code height restrictions of 50 feet. The overall appearance would be similar to a commercial office building. As part of the facility design,both vegetative and architectural screening has been added to ensure that exposed pipelines, tanks, and other utility-type equipment are screened from public view. The project would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect existing public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is EPA 10-001ITPM 10-130 -267- Item 50 - Page 15 visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. In addition, the project would replace three existing dilapidated fuel oil storage tanks with contemporary structures, which would improve the site's aesthetic character and result in a beneficial impact. m. Policy CE 7 (Page III-CE-26): Maintain and enhance the visual quality and scenic views along designated corridors. The project is consistent with this policy because there are limited views across the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) site due to the height of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks-proposed to be demolished. n. Policy ERC 4.1.5 (Page IV-ERC-25): Promote the preservation of public view corridors to the ocean and the waterfront through strict application of local ordinances, design guidelines and related planning efforts, including defined view corridors. The project is consistent with this policy because it would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. o. Policy AQ 1.8.2 (Page IV-AQ-15): Require installation of temporary construction facilities (such as wheel washers) and implementation of construction practices that minimize dirt and soil transfer onto public roadways. The project is consistent with this policy because it is subject to mitigation measures that control dispersal of soil as a result of construction activities. p. Policy EH 1.2.1 (Page V-EH-24): Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand ground shaking and liquefaction such as stated in the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all appropriate and applicable building standards related to ground shaking and liquefaction. q. Policy N 1.2.2 (Page V-N-6): Require new industrial and new commercial land uses or the major expansion of existing land uses to demonstrate that the new or expanded use would not be directly responsible for causing ambient noise levels to exceed an exterior Ldn of 70 dB(A) on areas containing"noise sensitive" land uses as depicted on Figure N-1. The project is consistent with this policy because it will be required to adhere to all applicable noise restrictions established by the City. r. Policy HM 1.1.4 (Page V-HM-7): Implement federal, state, and local regulations for the handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. Item 5o v Page 16-z3o -268- Attachment No. l.s The project is consistent with this policy because it includes appropriate and adequate controls for the handling, storage, and use of hazardous materials. The project will be an improvement to the area because it will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high-fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. There are limited views across the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) site due to the height-of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished. The project is required to provide a 10 foot (Edison) and 20 foot (Newland) landscape planter along the perimeter of the site to enhance the appearance of the area. These landscaping improvements are required to be consistent with the approved landscaping improvements for the rest of the HBGS property to the south for a cohesive appearance. The-proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses. However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL —ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10- 001 (AMENDING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 02-05): 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 to amend Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 approved by City Council in 2006 that allowed the construction and operation of a seawater desalination project by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project as proposed and modified by conditions of approval and code requirements, conforms to the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program by implementation of the following Coastal Element goals, objective, and policies: a. Policy C1.1.1 (p. IV-C-106): With the exception of hazardous industrial development, new development shall be encouraged to be located within, contiguous or in close proximity to, existing developed areas able to accommodate it or, where such areas are not able to accommodate it, in other areas with adequate public services, and-where it will not have significant adverse effects, either individually or cumulatively, on coastal resources. The project is consistent with this policy because it is proposed on a site that is already developed. Pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. b. Policy C 1.2.1 - Accommodate existing uses and new development in accordance with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan and the Development and Density Schedule Table C-1 The project is consistent with this policy because it is consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan and Density Schedule. c. Policy C4.2.1 (p. IV-C-119): Ensure that the following minimum standards are met by new development in the Coastal Zone as feasible and appropriate: Preservation of public views to and EPA 10-001/TPM 10-130 -269- item 5e a Page 17 from the bluffs, to the shoreline and ocean and to the wetlands; Adequate landscaping and vegetation, Evaluation of project design regarding visual impact and compatibility; and Incorporate landscaping to mask oil operations and major utilities, such as the electrical power plant on Pacific Coast Highway. The project is consistent with this policy because the project plans include a number of measures to minimize adverse visual effects of the proposed facility. The facility would be comprised of relatively low profile buildings reaching approximately 35 feet above the existing grade, which is below the 50-foot height limitation specified in the Zoning Code. The overall appearance would be similar to a commercial office building. As part of the facility design, both vegetative and architectural screening has been added to ensure that exposed pipelines, tanks, and other utility- type equipment are screened from public view. The project would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect public Views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. d. Policy C4.7.5 (p. IV-C-122): Require the review of new and/or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The project is consistent with this policy because the project will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. Proposed pipeline facilities are located within the coastal zone; however consistent with the Local Coastal Program, the facilities would be located below grade to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. e. Policy C4.7.8-(p. IV-C-122): Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. The project is consistent with this policy because landscaping is proposed along the Edison and Newland project frontages and architectural screening is provided for proposed tanks and structures. £ Policy C4.7.9 (p. IV-C-122): Require the removal of non-productive oil production facilities and the restoration of the vacated site. The project will replace a dilapidated fuel oil storage tank and will restore the site, substantially improving the existing visual character of the site. g. Policy C6.1.1 (p. IV-C-124): Require that new development include mitigation measures to enhance water quality, if feasible; and, at a minimum, prevent the degradation of water quality of groundwater basins, wetlands, and surface water. Item So a Page 18-130 -270- Attachment No. 1.7 The project is consistent with this policy because it is subject to mitigation measures relating to water quality. h. Policy C6.1.13 (p. IV-C-127): Encourage research and feasibility studies regarding ocean water desalinization as an alternative source of potable water. Participate in regional studies and efforts where appropriate. The project does not conflict with this policy as it is a seawater desalination facility intended to provide an alternative source of potable water. i. Policy C6.1.19 (p. IV-C-128): Prior to approval of any new or expanded seawater pumping facilities, require the provision of maximum feasible mitigation measures to minimize damage to marine organisms due to entrainment in accordance with state and federal law. Application of CEQA significance thresholds results in a determination that the seawater desalination--facility would not cause significant adverse impacts to marine life due to entrainment when it operates in either the co-located operating condition, or in the stand-alone operating condition. Sections 30230 and 30231 of the California Coastal Act (Coastal Act) require generally that marine resources be maintained, enhanced, and where feasible, restored. They also require that the marine environment be used in a manner that sustains biological productivity and maintains healthy populations of all marine species. It is not anticipated that the project would conflict with these policies. However, it is also noted that issuance of a CDP by the CCC will evaluate the project's consistency with these provisions of the Coastal Act, and that the CCC evaluation will include all necessary provisions, conditions or other requirements to ensure that consistency is achieved. j. Policy C 4.7 - Improve the appearance of visually degraded areas within the Coastal Zone. The project is consistent with this policy because it will be an improvement to the area by demolishing three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. The project is required to provide a 10 foot (Edison) and 20 foot (Newland) landscape planter along the perimeter of the site to enhance the appearance of the area. k. Policy C7.1.3 (p. IV-C-129): Development in areas adjacent to environmentally sensitive habitat areas and parks and recreation areas shall be sited and designed to prevent impacts which would significantly degrade those areas, and shall be compatible with the continuance of those habitat and recreation areas. The project is consistent with this policy because it includes significant setbacks from these areas and is further buffered by existing berms and proposed landscaping. Pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. EPA 10-001/TPM 10-130 -271- Item 5, m Page 19 1. Policy CT I A (p. IV-C-130): Require that new development contiguous to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitat areas include buffer zones. Buffer zones-shall be a minimum-of one hundred feet setback from the landward edge of the wetland, with the exception of the following: A lesser buffer may be-permitted if existing development or site-configuration precludes a 100- foot buffer, or conversely, a greater buffer zone may be required if substantial development or significantly increased human impacts are anticipated. In either case, the following factors shall be considered when determining whether a lesser or wider buffer zone is warranted. Reduced buffer zone areas-shall be reviewed by the-Department of Fish and Game prior to implementation. (a) Biological significance of adjacent lands: The buffer should be sufficiently wide to protect the functional relationship between wetland and adjacent upland. (b) Sensitivity of species to disturbance: The buffer should be sufficiently wide to ensure that the most sensitive species will not be disturbed significantly by permitted development, based on habitat requirements of both resident and migratory species and the short and long term adaptability of various species to human disturbance. (c) Susceptibility of parcel to erosion: The buffer should be-sufficiently wide to allow for interception of any additional material eroded as a result of the proposed development based on soil and vegetative characteristics, slope and runoff characteristics, and impervious surface coverage. (d) Use of existing cultural features to located buffer zones: The buffer zone should be contiguous with the environmentally sensitive habitat area and make-use of existing features such as roads, dikes, irrigation canals, and flood control channels where feasible. The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all of the minimum setback requirements included in Policy C7.1.4. in. Policy C7.1.5 (p. IV-C-130): Notify county, state, and federal agencies having regulatory authority in wetlands and other environmentally sensitive habitats when development projects in and adjacent to such areas are submitted to the City. The implementation of any Habitat Conservation Plan shall require an amendment to the Local Coastal Program. Incidental take of sensitive habitat and/or species that occurs in the context of development must be consistent with this LCP. The project does not conflict with this policy because it does not propose any development in or adjacent to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitats, and would not result in the incidental take of sensitive habitats or species. n. Policy C10.1.4 (p. IV-C-136): Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand ground shaking and liquefaction such as those stated in the Uniform Building Code. The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all appropriate and applicable building standards related to ground shaking and liquefaction The proposed desalination project is located within an unused fuel oil storage tank facility constructed in 1961 and formerly owned and operated by Southern California Edison. In addition to the proposed desalination facility site, the proposed project would also include several related off-site Item 5. - Page 20130 _272_ Attachment No. 1.9 improvements, including tie-in pipelines between the existing HBGS condenser cooling water discharge system and the proposed desalination project, modifications to an existing pump station and up to approximately 4 miles of product water delivery pipelines within the city. The intake/discharge pipelines would be located entirely within the existing HBGS site. The majority of the product water delivery pipeline would be located within existing public streets, easements, or other rights-of-way in urban areas. As such, the proposed new development is located within existing developed areas. The proposed use is consistent with the Coastal Element Land Use Plan designation of P (Public) for the site because it will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, and it is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities. The proposed use is compatible and consistent with the industrially designated properties immediately-surrounding the subject site and meets the requirements of the Coastal Element of the Land Use Plan and the Development and Density Schedule. The project will improve the appearance of the area by demolishing three existing unused 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and replacing them with lower profile, modern, and more attractive structures. The proposed structures vary in height from a maximum of 35 feet for the water tank to a minimum of 12 feet high for the ammonia tank. The proposed desalination project will not impact public views to the coast. There are limited views across the HBGS site due to the height of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures will have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished. A 10 foot and 20 foot planter along the lease area street frontage on Edison and Newland respectively will further improve the appearance of the project with attractive landscaping. In addition, the modifications to the existing and new pump stations, which are located behind an existing six foot wall,within an existing building, or below ground and the proposed pipeline alignment, which is situated below ground, will not impact public views or require landscaping to minimize visual impacts. As conditioned, the project is required to prepare a final landscaping plan along Edison Avenue for approval by the Design Review Board that is consistent in design, colors and materials with the landscaping for HBGS for a cohesive appearance. In addition, the conditions of approval for the project require compliance with landscaping requirements for the project site, and that landscaping along the Newland and Edison lease area street frontages include the densest type and number of trees to provide the most effective screening possible, which must be maintained to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. Landscaping within the eastern portion of the site will consist of native wetlands planting for compatibility with the wetlands to the southeast. In addition, the bottom portion of the structures will be hidden behind the existing berm along the perimeter. As noted above,the proposed structures are in substantial compliance with the Design Guidelines by employing variations in form, building details, colors, and materials that create visual interest, and the design is carried through all the structures including the architectural screen for the tanks to achieve a unified theme. The conditions of approval also require that utility meters be screened from public view and that backflow prevention devices be prohibited in the front yard setback and be screened from view. The EPA 10-001/TPM 10-130 -273- Item 5e m Page 21 conditions further require that all exterior mechanical equipment be screened from view on all sides, and that rooftop mechanical equipment be setback from the exterior edges of buildings. The Subsequent Environmental Impact Report analyzed the potential impacts of the project on water quality generally, as well as both ocean water quality and product water quality. Based on the analysis contained in the Subsequent EIR, no mitigation measures are required to protect or enhance ocean water quality. However, the Subsequent EIR contains a number of mitigation measures designed to prevent the degradation of and enhance water quality in groundwater basins, wetlands, surface water and product water. These mitigation measures are contained in the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the project. The Subsequent Environmental Impact Report analyzed under both co-located and standalone operating scenarios the potential impacts to marine organisms due to impingement and entrainment and concluded that no mitigation measures were required. The Subsequent EIR noted that under the co-located operating scenario impingement and entrainment are the responsibility of the HBGS-and that the proposed desalination facility does not directly take seawater from the ocean, and that withdrawal of feed water for desalination is from the HBGS cooling-water discharge. Under the stand alone operating scenario, the Subsequent EIR noted that impingement an entrainment of the proposed project will be insignificant and for these reasons, no mitigation measures are required to reduce impingement and/or entrainment impacts to marine organisms. The desalination project is surrounded by industrial properties, a 145-foot wide flood control channel, HBGS, a wetland area to the southeast and a mobile home park to the west. The wetland area is separated from the project by HBGS' existing unused oil tank and an existing berm and the mobile home park is separated by Newland Street and a vacant parcel. The project has been designed to not create any impacts to the wetlands or residential uses. Nonetheless, a number of mitigation measures will be required to ensure that impacts are minimized. State and Federal agencies with regulatory authority in wetlands and other environmentally sensitive habitats have been consulted as part of the CEQA process for the project. These agencies include, among others, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game, and California Coastal Commission. The project as conditioned will require compliance with the standards set forth in the most recent edition of the Uniform Building Code to assure safety of the occupants and seismic safety to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning and Building and Safety prior to issuance of a building permit. Lastly, the project is an ocean water desalination plant that will create an alternative source of potable water. When the project is completed, it will provide Orange County with 50 million gallons of potable water per day, accommodating the needs of Orange County regardless of weather or governmentally imposed conditions affecting water supply. By building the facility and locating it in Huntington Beach, the facility will demonstrate the opportunities offered by desalination, and will offer cities, counties, and the State of California a tangible example of how desalination can become more widely accepted throughout the state and the nation, and will encourage additional research and feasibility studies regarding ocean water desalination as an alternative source of potable water. Item 5. - Page 22130 -274- Attachment No. i.11 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, O Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The project meets or exceeds all minimum development standards including but not limited to setbacks, height, and parking. The project is required to comply with all Public Works, Fire, and Planning and Building Department codes and requirements. The project conforms to the City's Design Guidelines and incorporates variations in form, building details, colors, and materials that create visual interest. The project provides buffering from sensitive uses such as residential developments through landscaping, a block wall, and increased setbacks. The perimeter wall is designed in a manner to create an attractive appearance and will be consistent with the wall design approved for the portion of the HBGS property to the south for a cohesive appearance. The project meets all the requirements of the O-Overlay District. The project meets the minimum size requirements, and the project includes a reuse plan--to remediate property that has been contaminated by previous oil-related use. The property is required to operate in compliance with Title 15,Uniform Fire-Code, and any other applicable Federal, State, County, or local rules and regulations, and must be approved by the Fire Department. Non-permitted equipment will not be allowed to be used on the project site, and all requirements for the use of an O overlay zone have been or will be met, including dedication requirements. The project meets all the applicable requirements for the CZ overlay district. The project preserves and improves existing visual resources and complies with maximum height limitations, off-street parking requirements, landscaping requirements, and other requirements. Due to the nature of existing utility improvements at the project location, there is currently no public access at the site; therefore, public access will not be affected by the project. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. The proposed project is an infill development, which as conditioned and with the implementation of all mitigation measures will provide all necessary infrastructure to adequately service the site and not impact adjacent development. This includes dedication and improvements to the project lease frontage along Edison Avenue to improve circulation in the area. The proposed project will comply with City of Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements, including the installation of fire sprinklers and fire hydrants, and impacts of the project on the Fire Department are not expected to be significant. There are no anticipated additional impacts of the project on Police protection. The project is expected to have little or no impact on libraries. The impacts on roadway maintenance caused by the project are expected to be less than significant. The project is anticipated to have a negligible impact on parks and recreation facilities within the City. Project impacts to existing wastewater facilities are expected to be minimal, and the project plans are anticipated to include a new sewer line or private sewer system to accommodate additional wastewater. A local storm water drainage system would be implemented as part of the site facility, and storm water would be treated on-site prior to off-site discharge, as necessary to meet applicable requirements set by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board or the City. The project would require new facilities to support operational water uses, but these uses are not expected to create significant impacts. There are no significant impacts of the project on reclaimed water use. EPA 10-001/TPM 10-130 -275- item 5. - PageP23 The project would not create any significant impacts on the disposition of solid waste. The project's power demand would be less than one percent of the demand within Orange County or Southern California, and is anticipated to be less than significant. No impacts on natural gas supply are anticipated in the implementation of the project. No significant impacts on telephone and cable service are anticipated by the project. 4. The development of the desalination project and approximately one mile of water transmission lines within the Coastal Zone conforms to the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act as they will not impede any public access to the coast and public recreation opportunities in the area. All public access to the coast and public recreation in the area will not be impeded during the long-term operation of the facility as well as during the construction process with the implementation of conditions of approval and mitigation measures. The site does not currently provide public access or public recreation opportunities because of the nature of the historic uses at the site. The proposed project is consistent with the Public and Semipublic utility uses for which the site is designated, and is not suited for public access or recreation purposes for-a number of reasons, including concerns about public safety. The site is located landward of Pacific Coast Highway and would not provide a connection to the coast or public recreation opportunities, as it is virtually surrounded by industrial, utility or commercial uses. Nonetheless, because no public access or recreational opportunities currently exist on the site, the project will not impede existing public access to the coast or public recreation opportunities in the area. The project will not impact any existing public parking or beach access and will not discourage or impact any existing lower cost visitor and recreational facilities. The project site is currently not accessible to the beach, thus no access will be impacted. The proposed project will not impede any unique water-oriented activities, nor does it involve any oceanfront land suitable for recreational use. The project involves the use of private lands that are not suitable for visitor-serving commercial recreational facilities. Even if the lands were suitable for such visitor-serving uses, the project proposes a coastal-dependent industry use, which is not of a lower priority than visitor-serving uses. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL —TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 1. The tentative parcel map received and dated August 11, 2010 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. Remove Note G on Newland Street because the dedication and street widening on Newland Street has already occurred and there is no need for additional dedication. (PW) b. Horizontal control (i.e. bearing and distance) should be added for the hammerhead off of Edison Street. (PW) c. Remove the word "Emergency"from Note J and replace it with the word "Public" so that Note J would state "Proposed Public Access Easement." (PW) i$erh 5. v Page 24-13o -276- Attachment No. 1.13 SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL —ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10- 001: 1. The site plans, floor plans, elevations, and landscaping plan received and dated August 12, 2010 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following-modifications: a. The-landscape area on the east side of the project site on Parcel 3 shall include the removal of all Myoporum, and shall be planted with a palette of plants indigenous to the Southern California coastal community. b. Provide a patio along the front entrance of the administration building. (DRB) c. Provide landscape planters around the administration building. (DRB) d. Provide screening for the solids loading area and filter substation compatible with the project-. (DRB) e. Provide screening to the top of the chemical storage, carbon dioxide, and flush tanks. (DRB) f. The landscaping plan shall reflect plant materials that are more mature than the minimum code requirements subject to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. (DRB) g. The applicant shall install landscaping on Parcel 2 along Newland and Edison to match the project for a consistent appearance. h. The landscaping and wall plan shall be consistent in design, colors, and materials with the landscaping and wall plan for AES for a cohesive appearance. i. The landscaping along the Newland and Edison lease area street frontages shall include the densest type and number of trees to provide the most effective screening possible and shall be. maintained to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. j. A perimeter block wall shall be constructed along the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility/Poseidon boundary, per Public Works Department requirements. (PW) k. Buildings of the subject project may not cross property lines. Lot lines shall be adjusted at the proposed treatment facility accordingly. (PW) 1. Revise 36"42" City Pipeline Stub to 18"-36" City Pipeline Stub. (PW) in. Tree species planted along Edison Street shall not canopy over the street to avoid blocking large maintenance vehicles accessing the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility. (CS) 2. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the following shall be completed: For the demolition of the three (3) 200 foot diameter fuel oil tanks, a work plan must be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to commencement of work. (FD) EPA 10-001/TPM 10-130 -277- (tern 5. - Page 25 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall submit written proof of final project approval by each applicable regulating agency including but not limited to the California Coastal Commission, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District and all applicable water agencies and cities. b. The required Precise Grading Plan shall include the following: (PW) 1) Extension of the existing 8-inch diameter City sewer main in Edison Avenue easterly to the terminus of said street. 2) Connection to the existing 8-inch sewer main along the adjacent property's northerly property line (also southerly of the existing Orange County Flood Control District's right-of-way) shall be prohibited. c. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant will enter into a Franchise agreement-approved and executed by the City for the generation and transport of product water from the site, and through and across the city's_streets, rights-of-way or properties. (PW) (MC 3.44) d. A separate (new) irrigation water service and meter installed per Water Division Standards, and sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the landscape irrigation demand and the Water Efficient Landscape Requirements (MC 14.52) the minimum size shall be 1 '. (PW) e. The proposed 30"tank overflow line shall be prohibited from surface discharging directly into the public right-of-way. (PW) f. Areas for containment shall be provided to mitigate possible spillage of any materials affecting storm water quality that may be stored on-site, and to protect the adjacent wetlands to the maximum extent feasible. (PW) 4. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. A Water Purchase Agreement shall be executed between the applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project and the City of Huntington Beach and shall incorporate the following: (PW) 1) The City will have the option (the "Option") to enter into a water purchase agreement ("Water Purchase Agreement") to purchase water from the Project on terms essentially the same as all of the other water purchase agreements for the Project; provided, however that the City's price for up to 3,360 acre-feet per year(3 million gallons per day or 4.6 cubic feet per second) of the water purchased from the Project will be equal to the combination of(1) a 5%discount on the Item 5. - Page 26-130 -278- Attachment No. 1.15 purchase price of water supplied by MWD via the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and (2) any subsidy received by the City from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California or any other third party for the purchase of water from the Project such as, but not limited to, MWDOC; and provided further that the City's price will not exceed the purchase price for Project water in the other water purchase agreements for the Project. 2) The City will have the first right to purchase up to an additional 4,000,000 gallons per day(6.1 CFS) of additional water from the Project during a declared water emergency-at the same costs as above for not to exceed seven days in any 30 day period and not to exceed 28,000,000 gallons in any one emergency event.. The definition of a declared water emergency is a 50% or greater loss of overall City water supply (not including droughts) or connected facilities such as distribution system, booster stations, reservoirs, wells and imported connections causing a reduction of at least 50% of the City's water supply. c. The applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project will enter into an Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) approved and executed by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach. (EDD) 5. The structures cannot be occupied, the final building permits cannot be approved,utilities cannot be released, the use cannot commence,and the Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued until the following has been completed: The applicant shall demonstrate that all measures required by these conditions to protect the nearby wetlands have been implemented. 6. During demolition, remediation, grading, site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Construction equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. b. Use low sulfur(0.5%) diesel fuel by weight in all diesel equipment. c. Shut off engines when not in use. d. Attempt to phase and schedule activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts. e. Discontinue operation during second stage smog alerts. f Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. g. Discovery of additional contamination/pipelines, etc. must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly. (FD) 7. The applicant shall completely remove the storage tanks from the site within 12 months from the date of approval of City building permits and agreements. EPA 10-001/TPM 10-130 -279- Item 5e - Page 27 8. No parking shall be permitted on the south side of Edison Ave. (PW) 9. With the development of the proposed Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Facility, the applicant/operator of the project will deliver potable water to the City from a location within the project site, specifically the proposed Tank Storage site. The applicant/operator of the project shall provide a water pipeline from the tank storage site, a bypass water pipeline and located within the booster pump station, two pump cans including base plates, baffles, steal discharge heads, and suction manifolds per City requirements and specification. (PW) 10. The applicant shall keep the facility under video surveillance 24 hours per day every day. Videos should be saved for at least 30 days to provide Police with the recording.(PD) 11. Post clear signage describing the acceptable behavior allowed and uses of the facility. Signs should also make it clear that there is 24/7 video surveillance.(PD) 12. The administration building should be clearly marked to help visitors.(PD) 13. The entire facility should be lighted throughout all hours of darkness, but must conform to the lighting requirements of Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001.(PD) 14. The project shall comply with the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001. 15. The Planning and Building Department Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning and Building Department Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning and Building Department Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the City Council may be required pursuant to the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. 16. The applicant and applicant's representatives shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for review and approval. 17. The applicant/property owner and each successor in interest to the property which is the subject of this project shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the City, City Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 18. Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 and Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 which amends Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 shall become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of final approval by the City Council, or within two years of the date of final Coastal Development Permit approval by the Coastal Commission if the Item J. m Page 28' -2$®e Attachment No. 1.17 Coastal Development Permit is appealed, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning and Building Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. EPA 10-001/TPM 10-130 -281- Item 5. a Page 29 ATTACHMENT #2 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT SCH# 2001051092 FINDINGS OF FACTS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in Public Resources Code Section 21081 provides that: "[N]o public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out unless both of the following occur: (a) The public agency makes one or more of the following findings with respect to each significant effect: (1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. (2) Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. (3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. (b)With respect to significant effects which were subject to a finding under paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the public agency finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment." The City of Huntington Beach (City) has prepared the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) as the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.) and the state CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et seq.) to evaluate the environmental effects of the proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach. The City, as lead agency, determined that changes to the project and circumstances surrounding the project have occurred, and that new information has become available since the City certified the Recirculated Environmental Impact Report (REIR) for the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach on September 6, 2005 (2005 REIR). The SEIR analyzes the project proposal of Poseidon Resources (Surfside), LLC (Poseidon) to construct and operate an approximately 50-million-gallon-per-day (mgd) Huntington Beach Desalination Facility and other appurtenant and ancillary water and support facilities to produce potable water. Specifically, Poseidon has submitted the following to the City for review and approval: City of Huntington Beach Auglict ')nln PE-283-82 Item 50 - Page 31 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (1) Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001, which Amends Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04, and Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. (2) Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 (3) A Franchise Agreement between the City and Poseidon, including plans to obtain-approval to construct water conveyance pipelines and appurtenant facilities in the City of Huntington Beach in order to deliver drinking water to the regional distribution system serving residents and businesses in Orange County. (4) A Tank Site Exchange Agreement and Lease between the City and Poseidon (5) An Owner Participation Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency-of the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon The SEIR analyzes all components of the project, including water conveyance facilities located outside Huntington Beach. The City of Huntington Beach does not have permit jurisdiction over project components located outside its boundaries. Agencies other than the City of Huntington Beach will use the SEIR when making a decision on aspects of the project that requires their approval. More information-on agencies expected to use the SEIR may be found in Section 2.0, Introduction and Purpose. The SEIR was circulated for public review and comment as specified in the State CEQA Guidelines. Public comments were received by the City and have been responded to by the City in accordance with CEQA requirements. The City of Huntington Beach determined that the SEIR, comprised of the SEIR, a list of persons, organizations and public agencies commenting on the SEIR, comments received from the public and interested agencies, the Responses to Comments prepared by the City (including Errata to the SEIR), and all attachments and documents incorporated by reference is complete and adequate, and has been prepared in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The SEIR identified certain significant effects on the environment that may occur if the project is approved or carried out. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA, the City of Huntington Beach adopts this Statement of Findings of Facts and makes one or more of the three Section 21081 findings for each significant impact identified. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. However, unavoidable significant impacts related to both direct and cumulative impacts on short-term construction-related air quality emissions would remain as a consequence of the project, despite the incorporation of all feasible mitigation. In addition, significant effects related to indirect growth outside of the boundaries of Orange County that may occur remain unmitigated. Where the decision of a public agency allows the occurrence of a significant effect, which is identified in the SEIR but is not avoided, the agency must state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the SEIR and other information in the administrative record. Such a statement is called a Statement of Overriding Considerations. In accordance with CEQA, therefore, the City of Huntington Beach adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations included as Section 7.0 of this Statement of Findings of Facts. rifle of Nlantington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 32 PC-284-82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report This Statement of Findings of Facts, including the Statement of Overriding Considerations, is adopted by the City of Huntington Beach as part of its action to approve the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach. 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PROPOSED FOR APPROVAL. Poseidon has submitted an application to the City to amend previously issued land use approvals to construct and operate an approximately 50 mgd Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility (desalination facility) and other appurtenant and ancillary water and support facilities to produce potable water. The proposed desalination plant would have the capacity to deliver approximately 50 mgd of reverse osmosis (RO) permeate (product water). The desalinated water from the desalination plant would be distributed to the City of Huntington Beach and various cities and local water districts as purchasers for use and consumption by homes and businesses in Orange County. The on- and off site components of the desalination plant are discussed in Section 3.0, Project Description within the SEIR. All components of the desalination plant, including on and off site project elements, are proposed to be sized and built to accommodate and deliver approximately of 50 mgd of product water. The project would include the demolition of three fuel oil storage tanks currently located on the proposed facility site. On site facilities would consist of an administration building, RO facility building, pretreatment filter structure, solids handling building, post-treatment structure, chemical storage structure, product water pump station and surge tank, fluoride tank, flush tank, ammonia tank, influent pump station, a 66-kilovolt (kV) substation and associated connections to existing electrical transmission lines, electrical building, an aboveground product water tank, and appurtenant facilities. To produce 50 mgd of product water, the seawater desalination facility would require approximately 100 mgd of seawater. The proposed desalination facility would receive source water from the adjacent AES HBGS. The HBGS currently uses a condenser cooling system ("once-through cooling") in its energy production process and is permitted to intake up to 514 mgd of seawater directly from the Pacific Ocean through an existing intake pipeline. HBGS circulates the seawater through the energy-producing plant for cooling purposes. The historical maximum flow rate at HBGS has been 507 mgd. The source water for the proposed seawater desalination facility will be taken from the existing HBGS condenser cooling-seawater discharge pipeline system after the water has been used by HBGS for cooling. However, if in the future the HBGS were to cease the use of once-through cooling, or if the HBGS were to permanently alter its cooling water system's historical operations, the proposed seawater desalination facility would intake water directly from the Pacific Ocean via the existing HBGS intake pipe. In either case, and in order to protect the marine environment, 50 mgd of concentrated seawater would reenter the Pacific Ocean via the existing HBGS discharge pipe after blending with additional intake water to be used for dilution. The desalination facility would use state-of-the-art seawater RO membranes, which are capable of removing practically all contaminants in the source water: turbidity, taste, odor, color, bacteria, viruses, salts, proteins, asbestos, organics, etc. With pores ranging from 0.00005 to 0.0000002 microns (for comparison, typical human hair size is 200 microns) the RO membranes would retain and remove over 99.5% of the seawater salinity; over 99 %of the metals and organics, 99.999% of the bacteria and other pathogens (Giardia and Cryptosporidium), and 99.9% of the viruses in the source water. Therefore, the desalination facility would produce City of Huntington Beach Aur_l le+ ?n1 n PE'-285-82 Item 5e - Page 33 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report drinking water of very high and consistent quality, which meets or exceeds all applicable regulatory requirements established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Department of Public Health. The RO desalination technology is described in Section 3.0. A more detailed project description is provided in Section 3.0, PROJECT DESCRIPTION of the SEIR. 3.0 FINDINGS CONCERNING IMPACTS FOUND TO RE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT In evaluating the potential impacts associated with the project, the SEIR identified potential impacts that would not be significant. This section of the Statement of Findings of Facts identifies those impacts that may occur with project implementation, but were found to be below the threshold of significance. CEQA does not require findings for impacts that are found to be less than significant, and therefore do not require mitigation. Nevertheless, the following information is provided in order to summarize the basis for determinations of non-significance for the potential impacts as presented in the Section 4.0, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, in the SEIR. In some cases, the impacts addressed in this Statement of Findings of Facts are found not to be significant due to their nature. In other cases, the determinations take into account certain design features of the project. Although impacts determined to be not significant do not themselves require mitigation, in some cases mitigation measures that have been required to address other impacts found to be potentially significant and in need of mitigation will also further reduce the non-significant impacts. In these cases, the mitigation measures are noted, although the impacts would be less than significant even without such measures. Mitigation measures are referenced in this Statement of Findings of Facts using the same numbering system employed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program and the SEIR. A. IMPACTS RELATED TO LAND USE/RELEVANT PLANNING ( SEIR page 4.1-1 to 4.1-32) Section 4.1 of the SEIR addresses the potential impacts related to land use/relevant planning. Both topics (land use and relevant planning) are addressed in this Section of the Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for Potential Land Use Impacts The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not create any significant impacts to surrounding land uses. Less than significant impact. In addition, mitigation measures are discussed within other SEIR sections, including Sections 4.4 (Air Quality), 4.5 (Noise), 4.7 (Aesthetics/Light and Glare), 4.8 (Hazards and Hazardous Materials), and 4.9 (Construction- Related Impacts) that further illustrate this less than significant finding. Facts in Support of Finding Based on the analysis presented in Section 4.1 of the SEIR, land use impacts are less than significant without mitigation. With implementation of standard construction measures and recommended mitigation measures throughout the SEIR, there are no anticipated significant cif%,r%f Huntington Beach August, 2010 Item 5e - Page 34 p�-286-82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report land use impacts associated with short-term construction/remediation activities or long-term facility operation. The proposed pipeline alignment and underground pump station are adjacent to a variety of land uses, including residential, open space, commercial, educational, medical, and recreational. However, the pipelines and underground pump stations would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long-term land use impacts. These issues are discussed within other SEIR sections, including Sections 4.4 (Air Quality), 4.5 (Noise), 4.7 (Aesthetics/Light and Glare), 4.8 (Hazards and Hazardous Materials), and 4.9 (Construction- Related Impacts). Finding for Potential Relevant Planning Impacts The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not conflict with applicable relevant planning programs. No impact. Facts in Support of Finding Based on the analysis presented in Section 4.1 of the SEIR, relevant planning impacts are not significant. The project as described in Section 2.0 of this Statement of Findings of Facts will be consistent with the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, South Coast Air Quality Management Plan, Southeast Coastal Redevelopment Plan, the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide, and applicable sections of the California Coastal Act. No significant impacts to land use/relevant planning were identified; therefore, no mitigation measures are required. B. IMPACTS RELATED TO GEOLOGY, SOILS, & SEISMICITY (SEIR pages 4.2-1 to 4.2- 16) Section 4.2 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to geology, soils and seismicity. Topics relating to landslides and off site pipelines and underground pump stations are addressed in this Section. The remaining topics are addressed in Section 4.0-13 of this Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for Landslides The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will have no significant impact due to landslides on the project area. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding Based on the analysis presented in Section 4.2 of the SEIR, impacts related to the potential for landslides are less than significant without mitigation. Potential landslide areas within the City are limited primarily to the mesa bluffs region. However, the potential for seismically induced landslides along the levee of the neighboring Huntington Beach Channel is considered moderate to high. As stated previously, the sheet-pile walls constructed along the interior walls of the levee are not designed to withstand potentially large, lateral forces associated with strong ground motion from a nearby earthquake. Therefore, earthquake-induced slope instability should be considered part of the geotechnical evaluation for the project. The exterior berms that surround the site and that would remain in place would undergo slope stability analysis. With proper consideration of slope stability in the geotechnical evaluation and potential stability measures resulting, as applicable, impacts would be less than significant. City of Huntington Beach Aucallet ?non pz-287-82 `Item 5. - Page 35 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Finding for Off Site Pipelines and Underground Pump Stations The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach off site pipelines and underground pump stations will not result in significant impacts related to geology, soils and seismicity. Less than significant impact. In addition, applicable mitigation measures contained within Section 4.9 of the SEIR, inclusive, further reduce these less than significant impacts. Facts in Support of Finding Based on the analysis presented in Section 4.2 of the SEIR, impacts to off site pipelines and underground pump stations will not result in significant impacts related to geology, soils and seismicity. The proposed product water delivery pipelines are not anticipated to result in significant impacts in regard to geology and soils, because the majority of the alignment would occur within existing street ROW and various utility lines that currently exist along the alignment. Pipeline construction would be subject to standard erosion control measures similar to those implemented for the desalination facility site to contain any potential wind and water erosion on -site. Because-the pipeline alignments being considered are relatively flat and have been graded, impacts to natural topography are not anticipated. A design-level geotechnical investigation would be performed for the selected pipeline alignment to examine the potential for earthquake shaking hazards, surface rupture, shallow groundwater, and unstable soils (liquefaction, subsidence, lateral spread). Should the potential for such geological hazards- exist, adequate mitigation for-both pipeline construction and pipeline design would be incorporated to mitigate impacts in this regard to a less than significant level. Also refer to Section 4.9, Construction- Related Impacts, of this SEIR for a more detailed evaluation of pipeline construction. Construction of the proposed pump stations would also be subject to standard erosion control measures as required by local, state, and federal regulations to contain any potential wind and water erosion on site. The sites are relatively flat and limited in area, thus impacts to the natural topography of the site and surrounding vicinity are not anticipated. A design-level, site-specific geotechnical study would be prepared for any underground pump station and would incorporate adequate mitigation measures (if deemed necessary) for geologic hazards such as seismic-- shaking, surface rupture, shallow groundwater, liquefaction, subsidence, lateral spread, and landslides. Because any underground pump stations would require excavation to a depth of approximately 40 feet, lateral bracing for the sides of the chamber may be necessary because the site is in a designated liquefaction hazard zone (California Geological Survey 2001). Refer to Section 4.9, Construction-Related Impacts, of this SEIR for a more detailed evaluation of pump-station construction. C. IMPACTS RELATED TO HYDROLOGY, DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER RUNOFF (SEIR pages 4.3-1 to 4.3-14) Section 4.3 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential long-term impacts related to hydrology and water quality. As the proposed off site pipeline alignment and underground pump stations would be subsurface, there are no anticipated long-term impacts in regard to hydrology, drainage, and/or water quality. A discussion of short-term, construction-related impacts in regard to hydrology and water quality is included under Construction-Related Impacts. The remaining topics are addressed in Section 4.0-C of this Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for the Alteration to the Existing Drainage Pattern of the Site or Area that could Cause Erosion or Flooding rif%1 of N41mtington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 36 PE-288-82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach -FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Alterations to the existing drainage pattern of the site or area would not cause a significant impact by causing erosion or flooding. No significant impact is found. Facts in Support of Finding As discussed in Section 4.3 of the SEIR, the project would result in increases in impervious surfaces and modifications to runoff patterns on the site.-However, the alterations to drainage would not permanently expose substantial amounts of ground surfaces, would not create slopes or other conditions that would result in long-term erosion of the project site or surrounding areas, nor would it create siltation impacts that would cause substantial flooding risks. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant-. Finding Regarding the Depletion of Groundwater Supplies/Interference with Groundwater Recharge The potential for the proposed project to deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge will not be significant. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.3 of the SEIR, the project would introduce additional impervious surfaces on the desalination facility site, resulting in an increase in runoff that would be conveyed to a storm drain system. However, due to the relatively small size of the project site (13 acres), changes in runoff patterns would not substantially interfere with groundwater recharge. In addition, due to the location of the project in proximity of the Pacific Ocean and the related effects of seawater intrusion, the project site does not contribute substantially_ to groundwater resources within the area. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. D. IMPACTS RELATED TO AIR QUALITY (SEIR pages 4.4-1 to 4.4-23) Section 4.4 of the SEIR addresses the potential impacts related to air quality. Long-term air quality impacts are addressed in Section 4.4 and short-term construction impacts are discussed under Section 4.9, Construction Related Impacts. The remaining topics related to air quality are addressed in this Section. Finding for Mobile Source Emissions The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not result in significant impacts in regards to mobile source emissions or create a CO Hotspot. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As shown within Section 4.4, motor vehicles including potential employee and truck delivery trips associated with the project would constitute the primary source of pollutant emissions. It is anticipated that the project would result in an estimated worst-case scenario of 28 worker trips per day, traveling an estimated maximum distance of 10 miles each way, and would be the same for both the co-located and stand-alone operating conditions. In addition, truck deliveries have been anticipated to generate approximately 4 trips per day. The analysis illustrates the estimated long-term emissions from mobile sources would be well below the SCAQMD thresholds for CO, ROG, NO,,,and PM,o and would result in less than significant impacts. City of Huntington Beach Aurolef Wnln pE-289-82 �Item 5. - Page 37 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report The project is not anticipated to result in air quality impacts from CO hotspots. The project does not generate enough vehicular trips to result in a degradation of the level of service (LOS) of roadways in the site vicinity. Therefore, CO hotspots are not anticipated to result from project operations. Finding for Electricity Consumption The proposed project would not result in significant air quality impacts in regards to electricity consumption as part of the proposed project under the co-locating scenario or the stand-alone operating condition. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.4 of the SEIR, the co-located scenario involves the use of 26 pumps and 6 standby pumps, which would be used for seawater intake, reverse osmosis, product water, and membrane cleaning. The proposed project would produce an average annual product water flow of 50 million gallons per day (mgd). The-total power use for this plant and pumps along the primary pipeline route is projected to be 28.57 average megawatts (aMW), or 690.25 MW per day. The Longest Pipeline Option would use one less off site pump station than the Primary Pipeline Route. As a result, this alternative would result in 29:68 aMW per hour (high-efficiency design), which is 717.07 MW per day. Emissions from energy consumption would not-be considered part of the project's daily emissions because power-generation could occur outside of the SCAB and beyond. Additionally, the proposed project would avoid energy usage from transport via the State Water Project and would further reduce energy consumption with project design features that reduce energy requirements (increased energy efficiency, green building design, recovery of CO2, and potential-on site solar generation). Consequently, any impacts are considered less than significant. The stand-alone scenario involves the use of 27 pumps and 7 standby pumps on site, and 1 to 2 off site pumps. The proposed project would produce an average of 50 mgd. However, under this scenario, the proposed project would assume responsibility for the _intake of seawater through HBGS infrastructure. The total power use for this facility is projected to be 30.34 aMW (high-efficiency design), or 733.01 MW per day. The Longest Pipeline Option would use one less off site pump station than the Primary Pipeline Route. As a result, this alternative would result in 31.49 aMW per hour (high-efficiency design), which is 760.07 MW per day. The proposed project operating in the stand-alone condition would avoid energy usage from transport via the State Water Project and would further reduce energy consumption with project design features that reduce energy requirements (increased energy efficiency, green building design, recovery of CO2, and potential on site solar generation). Consequently, any impacts are considered less than significant. Finding for Indirect Emissions from a Connection to the State Electrical Grid or the HBGS The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not create-significant emissions due to connecting to the state electrical grid or a direct connection to the HBGS for either the co- located or stand-alone operating condition. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding Emissions associated with the electricity demand of the proposed project are depicted in Section 4.4 of the SEIR. Emissions from power consumption are regulated by SCAQMD's RECLAIM program, California's first air pollution cap-and-trade program, and it encompasses rif%,of Huntington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 38 pe-290-82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report most of the basin's largest NOx and SOx stationary sources. RECLAIM requires industries and businesses to cut-their emissions by a specific amount each year, resulting in a 70% reduction for NOx and a 60% reduction for SOx within the 10-year planning period from the inception of the program. Businesses that beat their reduction targets can trade their credits on the open market. Using market forces allows pollution to be cut in the most economical way. RECLAIM encourages the use of the latest and cleanest technology and the development of more advanced processes. To monitor emissions at larger sources, RECLAIM requires use of continuous emission-monitoring systems to determine actual mass emissions from these sources. These emissions are reported to the AQMD on a daily basis. Under the RECLAIM program, future NOx and SOx emissions for the region, including those resulting from project implementation, would be offset through the RECLAIM program, and no significant regional air quality impacts are anticipated. Emissions from the HBGS associated with the electricity are also shown in Section 4.4. As discussed in the SEIR, power would be supplied to the proposed project from either the HBGS or the existing power grid, and no new power plant or other industrial emissions sources would be constructed. If the power supply came directly from the HBGS, emissions would be below applicable emission thresholds and impacts would be less than significant. Finding for Chemical Storage Facilities The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not result in a significant air quality impact due to on site chemical storage facilities.. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.4 of the SEIR, various chemicals typically associated with desalination facilities would be stored on site. These chemicals are food-grade purity compounds typically used in most conventional water treatment facilities. The seawater desalination facility would use the same type and grade of chemicals as any other conventional surface water treatment facility. However, the seawater desalination facility would use fewer chemicals of lower dosages than existing conventional water treatment facilities in Southern California. Chemical storage and the use of chemicals during the desalination process are not anticipated to have significant impacts to air quality in the region. In addition, based on the types of chemicals stored on site and their containment methods, odors are unlikely to emanate from the project site. Furthermore, the project does not involve any odor-generating sources and is not classified as an odor-generating process (SCAQMD 1993); therefore, the project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Finding Related to Visibility The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not create significant impacts related to visibility issues. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As evaluated in Section 4.1 of the SEIR, A visibility analysis of the project's gaseous emissions is not required under the federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program. Further, considering the minimal amount of emissions generated by the operation of the proposed project, modeling was not required and therefore not conducted. Impacts would be less than significant. City of Huntington Beach Aucl ic+ 9n"n PC-291-82 `Item 5. - Page 39 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Finding Regarding Off site Pipelines and Underground Pump Stations The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not create any significant air quality impacts related to off site pipelines or underground pump stations. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As discussed in Section 4.4 of the_SEIR, off site project components would include water transmission pipelines and underground booster pump stations and piping modifications to an existing pump station. All internal combustion engines (ICEs) greater than 50 brake horsepower (bhp) are required to obtain a permit to construct from SCAQMD prior to installation of the engines at the project site. NOX emissions from diesel-fired emergency engines are 200 to 600 times greater, per unit of electricity produced, than new or controlled existing central power plants fired on natural gas. Diesel-fired engines also produce significantly greater amounts of fine particulates and toxics emissions compared with natural gas-fired equipment. For generators to be considered emergency backup generators by SCAQMD, they cannot operate more than 200 hours per year and can only operate in the event of an emergency power failure or for routine testing and maintenance. Further, SCAQMD has provided a list of models of equipment as meeting all applicable air quality requirements and has issued permits to the dealer/distributor of these engines. The diesel-powered generator anticipated for the project, Caterpillar model 3516C, is included on the approved list provided by the SCAQMD (2007b). Additionally, it would be necessary to apply for a Special Application for Temporary Emergency Authorization to Operate Electric Backup Generator(s) During Involuntary Power Service Interruptions Permit. Therefore, impacts associated with the operation of diesel-powered generators would be less than significant. Pump stations as well as water transmissions lines would occasionally require maintenance, which would generate worker trips. Maintenance activities would occur at sporadic instances, and therefore, modeling would be neither required nor conducted since trip generation from such activities would not result in any significant air quality impacts. Water transmission lines would not result in criteria pollutant emissions and therefore would not have any significant impacts to air quality. Finding for Consistency with Regional Plans The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not conflict with local and regional air quality planning documents. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As discussed within the SEIR, the proposed project does not involve a General Plan amendment, zone change, or other change in land use, and is consistent with the County of Orange and City of Huntington Beach land use assumptions. The regional Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is based on the City and County's General Plan assumptions, and the project is consistent with these assumptions. Since the proposed desalination project is consistent with these General Plan assumptions, the project would be considered consistent with the AQMP's land use assumptions and goals. In addition, the region is regulated by SCAQMD's RECLAIM program, which controls the amount of NO, and SOX emissions through financial incentives and involves the trading of emissions credits. Future NO,, and SOX emissions for the region, including those resulting from project implementation, would be offset through the RECLAIM program, and no significant regional air quality planning impacts are anticipated. ri+"r%f Niantington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. e Page 40 Pa,-292-,82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report In addition, according to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the project is consistent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP). Impacts in-this regard are not anticipated to be significant. E. IMPACTS RELATED TO NOISE (SEER pages 4.5-1 to 4.5-18) Section 4.5 of the SEIR addresses the project's long-term potential impacts related to noise. Short-term, construction-related noise impacts are discussed in Section 4.9, Construction- Related Impacts. The SEIR addresses two topics (mobile noise sources and stationary noise sources). Mobile noise sources and stationary noise sources for the off site pipelines and -booster pump stations are addressed in this Section. Stationary noise sources for the desalination facility site are addressed in Section 4.0-E of this Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for Mobile Noise Sources The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not generate a significant amount of noise resulting from mobile noise sources. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.5 of the SEIR, the project would generate a nominal amount of noise resulting from mobile sources as a result of employee trips and truck-generated traffic. The proposed desalination facility would employ a total of approximately 18 people, with an average of five to seven people on site per shift on weekdays. It is anticipated that the project would result in an estimated worst-case scenario of 28 round-trip worker trips per day, traveling an estimated maximum-distance of 10 miles each way. In addition, facility operation would require a maximum of four truck trips per day for solid waste disposal and chemical delivery. Noise generated by mobile sources as a result of the proposed desalination facility would be less than significant. Finding for Noise from Long-Term Operations of Off Site Pipelines and Underground Booster Pump Stations The proposed desalination project would-not generate a significant amount of noise resulting from long-term operations off site pipelines and underground booster pump stations. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.5 of the SEIR, the proposed product water pipelines would occur entirely underground. Upon completion of construction, these pipelines would not generate noise. In addition, as the OC-44 booster pump station would be less than 500 horsepower (hp) and produce noise levels of approximately 88 dBA at 3 feet from the source. As the booster pump would both be located underground and contain an adequate amount of acoustical shielding, operations associated with the pump station will not emit noise levels in excess of County of Orange codes and the off site underground booster pump station is not anticipated to adversely affect the NCCP/HCP area along the eastern border of the City of Newport Beach. Similarly, the coastal junction booster pump station would both be located underground and contain an adequate amount of acoustical shielding. The Magnolia and Brookhurst pump stations are located at the intersections of Orangewood Avenue/Magnolia Street and Brookhurst Street/Bixby Avenue in the City of Garden Grove. The pump stations would be constructed within a disturbed right-of-way. The Bristol Pump Station is City of Huntington Beach Aurl ic+ gni n Pa,-293d 82 `fltern s. - Page 41 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report located in the City of Santa Ana to the north of the Bear Avenue/Segerstrom Avenue intersection within an area that includes recreational uses. Similar to the OC-44 Booster Pump Station and Coastal Junction Pump Station, the pumps would be less than 500 hp and produce noise levels of approximately 88 dBA at 3 feet from the source. Since the proposed facilities would be both located underground and surrounded by concrete walls, it would not emit noise levels in excess of applicable City codes in which the stations are located. All pump stations will be required to meet the local jurisdiction noise ordinance standards. Impacts in this regard are not anticipated to be significant. The pump station equipment would be designed to produce very low vibration levels because to operate efficiently the equipment needs to be well balanced. Experience with similar facilities demonstrates a negligible possibility for vibration impacts to surrounding land uses. The closest residence from any of the five pump stations would be at least 95 feet away and the resulting vibration level at a distance of 95 feet would be less than 0.001 inches/second. This vibration level is well below the threshold of human perception for vibration and the impact would be less than significant. F. IMPACTS RELATED TO PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES (SE/R pages 4.6-1 to 4.6-18) Section 4.6 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to public services and utilities. Impacts-related to solid waste are addressed in Section 4.0-F of this Statement of Findings of Facts. The remaining topics related to public services and utilities are addressed in this Section. Finding for Fire Service The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact on the demand for fire service within the City of Huntington Beach. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding The project would comply with City of Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements, including the installation of fire sprinklers and fire hydrants. It is not anticipated that project implementation would result in the need for additional Fire Department facilities. The proposed project is not of the scope or nature to create a significant increase in demand for services requiring physical additions to the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department. Adequate emergency access would be provided in accordance with City and County requirements. Impacts are not anticipated to be significant. Finding for Police Service The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact on the demand for police service within the City of Huntington Beach. No Impact. Facts in Support of Finding As discussed in Section 4.6, the proposed project would be within the service area of the Huntington Beach Police Department. The desalination facility will operate almost always 24 hours per day 365 days/year with security and/or employees always on the site monitoring activities. The proposed facility is not anticipated to create a significant increase in service calls r'i+"of Nlantington Beach August, 2010 Item 50 - Page 42 Pa.-294;82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report to the project vicinity, nor is it expected to create a need for additional police facilities within the City. No impacts are anticipated in this regard. Finding for Schools The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact on the City of Huntington Beach school system. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As discussed within Section 5.6 of the SEIR, the project does not propose housing or other student-generating uses. According to the Huntington Beach Union High School District, the project is anticipated to have negligible impacts on school facilities within the City, and is anticipated to have a student generation rate of .0000340242 per square foot. However, in consideration of AB 2926, the applicant would be required to pay a commercial fee of $0.47 per square foot for non-residential development within the Huntington Beach Union High School District, of which the High School District would receive 39%, or $0.1833 per square foot of the total fee. The Huntington Beach City School District would receive the remaining 61% ($0.2867 per-square foot) of the commercial fee, and it does not anticipate that the proposed project would have significant student-generating impacts or require other assessment fees or mitigation measures. The project is not expected to generate the need for additional school facilities. Therefore the payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance would offset potential impacts to the construction or expansion of new school facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated in this regard. Finding for Libraries The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact on the City of Huntington Beach library system. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding The proposed desalination project is not anticipated to have significant impacts on the City of Huntington Beach library system. Although the nearest library facility to the project site (the Banning Branch Library) is small in size, the project is anticipated to have a negligible impact on the branch. The applicant will be required to pay standard library fees as part of the proposed project and impacts are less than significant. Finding for Roadway Maintenance The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact on or cause a significant impact due to any roadway maintenance activities. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As evaluated under Section 4.6, landscaping and street improvements along Edison Avenue and Newland Street, as well as landscaping improvements along the eastern site boundary, are included in the project and will be installed pursuant to Code requirements from the City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works. The landscaping and street improvements are subject to Design Review Board review and approval and may change based on the Board's review. Along the northern portion of the project site, Edison Avenue would be improved. These City of Huntington Beach Aucri le+ gni n Pa.-295;82 `Item 5. - Page 43 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report improvements would consist of the dedication of 12 feet along the frontage of the existing Edison Avenue (for curb, gutter, paving, turn-about, and street lighting improvements) for a total of approximately 600 linear feet. The project applicant would be responsible for completing the roadway and landscaping improvements along the project's frontage as a condition of approval for the project subsequent to property dedication. Impacts would be less than significant. Finding for Parks and Recreation The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact on the demand for parks and recreational_facilities within the City of Huntington Beach. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding The recreational facilities nearest the project site are Edison Community Center, Huntington State Beach, and Huntington City Beach, all of which are located within a radius of approximately 0.5 mile. The proposed desalination facility would be situated in an industrial area and would employ approximately 18 people, with 5 to 7 people on duty during regular working hours Monday through Friday, and a minimum of 2 people on duty during swing shifts, graveyard shifts, and weekends. The project is anticipated to have a negligible-impact on parks and recreation facilities within the City and will be required to pay development-impact fees prior to issuance of grading permits. The project applicant will be required to demonstrate compliance with City parkland requirements identified in Chapter 254.08 (or Ordinance No. 3596) of the City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Impacts in this regard will be less than significant. Finding for Wastewater The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact due to wastewater. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding See the discussion regarding wastewater under Section 4.6 of the SEIR. Per conditions of approval, new sewer lines will be implemented to provide suitable wastewater services. All appropriate permits will be obtained. The proposed project would only produce nominal amounts of domestic wastewater. However, desalination facility operation would require that used reverse osmosis (RO) membrane cleaning first-rinse solution is discharged into the local sanitary sewer for treatment as well as waste cleaning solution from the RO membranes during any cleaning operations. However, given the volume and relative strength of the cleaning solutions and the requirement of commercial/industrial capital facility fees for this discharge in the sewer system, impacts were determined to be less than significant. Finding for Stormwater Drainage The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact related to stormwater drainage facilities. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding An on site stormwater drainage system would be implemented as part of the desalination facility site. The desalination facility area and aboveground product water storage tank area would rit"of Huntington Beach August, 2010 Item 50 - Page 44 Pa -296-�82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report feature catch basins and stormwater pump stations to provide adequate drainage. Stormwater flows would first be directed to catch basins by gravity, and would then be directed to a stormwater pump via gravity lines. Stormwater shall be tested for pollutants and treated using one of two sedimentation methods. The water would then be pumped to the 72-inch-by-product concentrated seawater discharge line that ultimately connects to the HBGS outfall line. As alternative options, the desalination facility's on site stormwater system could discharge stormwater to the HBGS on site stormwater system or the City's local stormwater system. Stormwater would be treated prior to off site discharge in order to minimize impacts from urban pollutants. The most viable stormwater treatment alternative would be selected during the design phase of the project and would be designed to comply with all applicable requirements of the City and the SARWQCB. Therefore, as explained in Section 4.6 of-the SEIR, impacts are less than significant. Finding for Water Supplies The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact related to the use of or need for onsite water supplies. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As discussed under Section 4.6_of the SEIR, as well as discussions related to existing and projected water supplies (Section 4.11), implementation of the proposed project would require new facilities to support operational uses (e.g., pipeline extensions, drinking fountains, and restrooms), although these are not anticipated to create significant impacts. It is anticipated that normal domestic demand created by the proposed project can be provided with desalinated water generated on site. However, should the project require potable water from the City, adequate backflow protection devices would be installed and maintained to ensure that no mixing of potable and subpotable water would occur. The project applicant will be required to pay appropriate fees for water service connections, installation, and meters in the event they are required. Impact would be considered less than significant. Finding for Electricity The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact on the electrical facilities providing service to the project vicini(y. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding See the discussion under Section 4.6 of the SEIR. Under both the co-located and the stand- alone scenarios, based upon power consumption of 15 kilowatt hours per thousand gallons, the proposed 50 mgd desalination facility would require approximately 30 to 35 average megawatts to produce and distribute potable water. As such, the daily energy consumption of the facility is estimated to be between 793 to 840 megawatt hours per day and the total annual power use is estimated to be between approximately 289,715 MHh/yr and MWh/yr 306,680 for the co-located scenario and the stand-alone scenario respectively. The proposed project's introduction of a new, local source of water into Orange County will result in a net reduction in energy demand that is currently associated with imported water supplies. The project will supply 56,000 afy to Orange County, providing a direct, one-to-one replacement of imported water to meet the requirements of the participating water agencies, and thus eliminating the need to pump 56,000 acre-feet of water into the region. 3.13 MWh of electricity is required to pump 1 acre-foot of State Water Project (SWP) water to the customer. City of Huntington Beach Aup le+ )nl n Pa -�97 82 ` Item 5. - Page 45 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Because the project will avoid the use of 56,000 afy of imported water to Orange County, once in operation, the project will also avoid 175,500 MWh/yr of electricity consumption otherwise required to deliver that water to Orange County. Under the co-located scenario the project requires 289,715MWh/yr, which results in the net increase in total annual electricity consumption of the proposed project of 114,215 MWh/yr. Under the stand-alone scenario the project would require 306,680 MWh/yr, resulting in a net increase in annual electricity consumption of 131,180 MWh/yr. Electric power-generating plants are distributed throughout the state, and the project's electrical demand would be met by dozens of power plants connected to a regional power supply source, with many of those plants located outside of Southern California. The project includes an electrical substation facility. It is not anticipated that the increase in energy demand and consumption would require expansion of or improvements to existing facilities within the ISO- controlled electricity grid that could result in significant environmental effects. Therefore, impacts to energy resources and facilities would be less than significant. Finding for Gas The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact on local natural gas facilities. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding The Southern California Gas Company can provide gas service to the proposed project via numerous gas mains surrounding the subject site. Project implementation would not result in any construction-related impacts to the service area. No impacts are anticipated in this regard. Finding for Telephone and Cable The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact on telephone or cable service- facilities within the vicinity of the project area. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding Verizon provides telephone service and Time Warner provides cable service within the project vicinity. Verizon has telephone facilities located underground along Newland Street (located west of the project site), aboveground along Edison Avenue (located north of the project site), and aboveground within HBGS property (located south of the project site). Verizon would be available to provide telephone service to the subject site from existing facilities. Cable television access to the City is provided by Time Warner Communications via underground cable along Newland Street. Neither Verizon nor Time Warner anticipate long-term impacts to telephone or cable facilities as a result of project implementation. However, short-term impacts to telephone and cable facilities may occur if underground utility lines along Newland Street are interrupted or relocated during construction. Proper planning during construction would reduce the likelihood of impacts to these facilities. Impacts would be less than significant. G. IMPACTS RELATED TO AESTHETICS/ VISUAL CHARACTER AND LIGHT AND GLARE (SE/R pages 4.7-1 to 4.7-18) r'i+„of NJantington Beach August, 2010 Items 50 - Page 46 Pa -298-;82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Section 4.7 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to aesthetics/visual character and light and glare. Those potential impacts are addressed in Section 4.0-G of this Statement of Findings of Facts. H. IMPACTS RELATED TO HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ( SEIR pages 4.8-1 to 4.8-18) Section 4.8 of the SEIR addresses the potential impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials. Potential long-term operational impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials are addressed in this Section. Short-term hazards/hazardous materials impacts in regards to remediation, construction and demolition are discussed in Section 4.9, Construction-Related Impacts. Finding for-Hazards and Hazardous Materials The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not result in significant long-term operational impacts relating to hazards or hazardous materials with respect to existing on-site and off-site contamination, project operations, RO membrane cleaning solution or product water treatment materials. Less than-significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding On-Site and Off-Site Contamination. The proposed desalination project will not result in long- term impacts in regards to existing on- and off-site soil and groundwater contamination. The project site has been identified on various regulatory databases as being contaminated from the release of hazardous substances in the soil or groundwater. Prior to the development of the site, the project would be required to undergo remediation and cleanup activities. The proposed project is expected to have a beneficial impact in regards to long-term hazards and hazardous materials. Project Operation. The proposed project would involve the storage, handling, and use of hazardous materials. The project will conform to all federal, state and local regulations regarding the transportation, use, storage, generation and disposal of hazardous materials to minimize potential health and environmental hazards that could occur through accidental spills or leakage. A Business Emergency Plan (BEP) and Hazardous Materials Inventory will be prepared by the project for submittal to the City of Huntington Beach Certified Unified Program Agency. In addition to identifying hazardous substances, the BEP includes details that facilitate coordination and emergency planning with on- and off-site response officials and facilities in the event of an emergency. The Project will be required to submit a Hazardous Materials Disclosure package, consistent with the City of Huntington Beach Hazardous Materials Disclosure Program requirements. The delivery of chemicals to the site will be completed along City roadways located within the vicinity of the project site. Transportation of hazardous materials will comply with all DOT, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), US EPA, DTSC, California Highway Patrol, and California State Fire Marshal regulations. RO Membrane Cleaning Solution. The citric acid, sodium hydroxide, sodium tri polyp hosphate, and sodium dodecylbenzene would be delivered to the subject site in 50-gallon plastic containers and would be stored in the RO building within concrete enclosures for use of cleaning of RO membranes. A drainage system would be provided for chemical evacuation in the event of an accidental spill. As these chemicals would not be used frequently, they would be City of Huntington Beach Aucal ic+ '?nl n Pa -299 82 `Item 5e - Page 47 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report delivered to the site on an as-needed basis, and no more than one container per chemical would typically be stored or used at one time. The chemicals listed in the SEIR are nonflammable and would be stored and used at the treatment facility site in quantities below the threshold quantity levels, as defined by the applicable federal, state, and local hazardous materials handling and management regulations, at which they would present a potential for a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The maximum volume for citric acid, sulfuric acid, and sodium hydroxide, which would be stored on site in liquid form, would be 50 gallons. This volume is below the minimum threshold quantity of 55 gallons defined by the applicable regulations. The sodium tripolyphosphate B and sodium dodecylbenzene B would be delivered and stored in solid form, and the maximum amount of these chemicals stored would be 480 pounds, which is below the most stringent threshold -quantity for storing solid hazardous materials (500 pounds). Mixing of the membrane-cleaning chemicals at the indicated concentrations would not generate flammable substances or a significant amount of hazardous vapor emissions. The chemicals listed in the SEIR would be stored in the membrane cleaning room of the RO building of the desalination facility and would be used and stored on site only while membrane cleaning is being completed. This room would have an automatic sprinkler system for fire control, and spill containment and control provisions in the storage, handling, and dispensing area of the room. Product Water Treatment Materials. In addition to the RO membrane-cleaning solution, additional chemicals for water treatment would be used, stored, and handled on site (see Section 5.8 of the SEIR for more detail). The design incorporates leak and spill containment measures to minimize the risk of upset to both on site employees and surrounding uses, -consistent with all federal, state, county, and City regulations. Hazardous materials would be stored in concrete containment structures with a 110% spill containment capability. If necessary, the inner housing of the concrete containment structure would be coated for resistance to chemicals, and each structure would be separated or divided from other chemicals to prevent mixing in the case of accidental spillage. Storage tanks would be constructed of appropriate, non-reactive materials, compatible with the recommendations of the supplier of the hazardous material. In the event of an accidental liquid chemical spill, the chemical would be contained within the concrete containment structure and evacuated through an individual drainage system. The spilled chemical would then be pumped into hazardous waste containment trucks and transported off site for disposal at an appropriate facility. This operation would be completed by a specialized contractor licensed in hazardous waste handling and disposal. Spill notification thresholds would be established and published, and appropriate agencies, such as the City of Huntington Beach Fire and Police departments, would be contacted if necessary. The existing containment berms along the northern and eastern boundaries of the proposed desalination site (which are 10 to 15 feet high) would further minimize the potential release of hazardous materials into the adjacent Huntington Beach Channel and wetlands. Chemicals would be delivered to the desalinization facility by trucks specifically designed and suitable for chemical storage and offloading. On average, less than ten trucks per day is expected to deliver chemicals to the proposed desalination site, which is considered consistent and compatible with the site's designation as an industrial area. The transportation of hazardous materials to the desalination facility would comply with all California Department of Transportation regulations. The facility would utilize registered haulers to further reduce the potential for accidental release or exposure of these hazardous materials to the environment and individuals during transport. �i+" nt N1antington Beach August, 2010 Item 5e - Page 48 Pa 1-300 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Hazardous waste management, transportation, use, storage, and disposal information and procedures would be processed and approved through the Huntington Beach Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division and other applicable regulatory agencies. The desalination facility operator would develop hazardous waste management and safety plans and in accordance with OSHA, operation of the proposed facility would require the preparation of a Process Safety Management Program (PSM), which is designed to prevent or minimize the consequences of catastrophic releases of toxic, reactive, flammable, or explosive chemicals. The project would also be in compliance with EPA Risk Management Planning Rule 40 CFR 68, which would require the facility operator- to register the facility with the EPA prior to on-site storage of hazardous chemicals. For security purposes, the desalination facility would allow site access to authorized personnel only via a secured entry point with a 24-hour guard. In addition, all chemicals would be managed in accordance with the California Hazardous Waste Control Law and the Hazardous Waste Control Regulations. Project features that are designed to reduce-risks associated with chemical use and storage, combined with regulatory requirements for safe handling and storage of materials will minimize hazards associated with operation.As such, the project will not create a significant hazard to-the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, or create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. In addition, the project site is not within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. Therefore, impacts in regards to the long-term operational use, storage, and transport of hazardous materials involved in desalination facility operation would be less than significant. Finding for Off Site Pipeline Alignments and Underground Pump Stations The proposed desalination project would not result in long-term hazardous operational impacts in regards to off site pipeline alignments and underground pump stations. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding OC-44 Booster Pump Station As stated within Section 5.8 of the SEIR, the proposed off-site pipeline alignments would occur adjacent to a variety of land uses, primarily within existing street ROWs and easements. No known areas of hazardous materials exist along the proposed alignments. Hazardous materials impacts due to long-term operation of the pipelines are not anticipated to occur, as the only liquid proposed for conveyance is potable water. Diesel fuel would be stored within an 8,700- gallon, double-walled tank with a diameter of 8 feet and a height of 26 feet. The tank would be located underground since the entire pump station vault would be located below grade, including the backup diesel generators. The storage tank would be located nearby but separate from the pump station vault and would feature a double-walled containment system with monitoring equipment to prevent and detect leakage. The tank would be contained within the surrounding soil and would supply diesel fuel to the generators (housed within the pump station vault) during power emergencies. Coastal Junction, Magnolia, Brookhurst an Bristol Booster Pump Stations The pump stations would also require the storage of diesel fuel for the operation of one emergency backup electrical generator. Diesel storage capacity for one backup generator would be 1,300 gallons. This diesel fuel would be stored in a similar manner as the OC-44 pump City of Huntington Beach Aup,10 ?n1 n Pa -301;82 Item 5e - Page 49 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report station discussed above, and the same safety precautions (i.e., double-walled containment system, leakage monitoring equipment) would be incorporated into the pump station design. Modifications to the existing OC-35 Pump Station would only involve pump replacement, and would not otherwise affect the facility or operations, including storage of hazardous materials. Impacts in regards to the off site use, storage, and transport of hazardous materials are not anticipated to be significant. I. IMPACTS RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION (SEIR pages 4.9-1 to 4.9-64) Section 4.9 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to construction. Those potential impacts are addressed in Section 4.0-1 and Section 5.0 of this Statement of Findings of Facts. J. IMPACTS RELATED TO OCEAN WATER QUALITY AND MARINE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (SEIR pages 4.10-1 to 4.10-68) Section 4.10 of the SEIR addresses the project's _potential impacts related to ocean water quality and marine biological resources. Those potential impacts are addressed in this Section. Finding for Potential Sources of Contamination in Proximity to the HBGS Intake The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not be significantly impacted by Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) wastewater discharge, urban stormwater runoff, dry weather runoff, the recirculation of HBGS discharge, the Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, cruise ships and fishing boats, recreation, oil and gas production facilities, the operation of HBGS, or elevated bacteria levels in the Huntington Beach surf zone. Less than significant impact on the HBGS seawater intake. Facts in Support of Finding Oceanographers from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography conducted modeling studies using a computer model that simulates ocean conditions near the HBGS intake and outfall. The modelers from Scripps used their many years of experience working along the Southern California coast to determine the worst case conditions that would be modeled. The worst case conditions were chosen to determine if any adverse water quality or environmental impacts occurred under extreme ocean and weather conditions that were most likely to show an effect. The analysis in Section 4.10 of the SEIR shows that there will be a less than significant impact on the HBGS intake from potential contamination sources. Impact from OCSD Wastewater Discharge: The worst-case model results show that the OCSD discharge is diluted 30 million to one at the HBGS intake. Any contaminants discharged at the OCSD outfall would be diluted far below background levels at the intake to the HBGS. Therefore, the OCSD discharge does not have a significant source of contamination at the HBGS intake. As far as other constituents of concern for the OCSD discharge, the desalination facility discharge water quality would be well within the limits established in the Ocean Plan. Impacts in this regard will be less than significant. Impact from Urban Stormwater Runoff.- During a 24-hour extreme runoff period only 0.0003 percent of the water at the HBGS intake would come from the Santa Ana River and Talbert Marsh and the remaining 99.9997 percent would be seawater. These results show that contaminants are not transported to the HBGS rrifxl r%f ulantington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 50 Pa.-302-;82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report intake from the Santa Ana River and Talbert Marsh during extreme storm conditions. More detailed modeling results are presented in the appendix for the SEIR. Impacts will be less than significant in this regard. Impact from Dry Weather Runoff. Tidal flushing of the Talbert Marsh would have the greatest potential to impact water quality at the HBGS intake during high spring tides combined with summer El Nino conditions when -currents are flowing northwest from the marsh towards the intake. Under these worst-case conditions, the marsh water is diluted 20,000 to one and essentially does not reach the intake. This is due to the fact that the marsh water is released into the surf zone and the onshore waves keep the marsh water in the shallow nearshore waters, whereas the HBGS intake is located 1,840 feet offshore at a depth of approximately 33 feeL Impacts will be less than significant. Impact from the Recirculation of HBGS Discharge: The HBGS outfall is located approximately 1,500 feet offshore and 340 feet from the HBGS intake. The potential for recirculation of the discharge into the intake was examined. The discharge consists primarily of cooling water, but a small amount of power plant process wastewater and stormwater can be mixed with the cooling water.- The concentrated seawater from the proposed desalination facility will also be mixed with the power plant cooling water. Recirculation of the HBGS discharge would have the greatest potential to impact water quality at the intake during El Nino storm conditions when the maximum amount of storm water is being discharged through the outfall. The hydrodynamic model for recirculation of the HBGS discharge was run using the El Nino conditions of February 1998 and the maximum allowable discharge of 1.66 MGD of generating station process wastewater and storm water. In addition, the proposed desalination facility was assumed to be running at full capacity so that 50 MGD of concentrated seawater discharge was mixed with the cooling water discharge. The model results for a 7-day extreme runoff period show that only 0.1 to 0.3 percent of the HBGS discharge would be recirculated to the intake. It should be noted that in the stand-alone operating condition, the discharge recirculation would be slightly less that the 0.3 percent modeled for the co-located condition. Based on these results, the recirculation of the HBGS discharge during storm events does not present any significant impacts on source water quality. Impacts from the Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers: The Los Angeles River discharges to the ocean approximately 16 miles upcoast (i.e. northwest) from HBGS, while the San Gabriel River discharges approximately 11 miles upcoast. The amount of dilution that occurs and the fact that the generating station intake is at a depth of approximately 33 feet indicates that contaminants entering the ocean from these two rivers would not likely affect the water quality at the HBGS intake, and would not present any significant impacts on source water quality. Impacts from Cruise Ships and Shipping Boats: The nearest major port for cruise ships is located approximately 16 miles northwest of the HBGS intake. Ingress/egress routes for cruise ships for Long Beach and Los Angeles Harbors do not come in close proximity to the HBGS. In addition, given the limited nature of sportfishing that occurs in the project site vicinity, impacts are less than significant. Impacts from Recreation: Any contaminants released into the ocean due to recreational use are likely to be small in quantity greatly diluted due to tidal action. It would be difficult for such contaminants to reach City of Huntington Beach Aug-f ?nln Pa -303-182 `Item 5. - Page 51 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report the HBGS intake due to its depth of approximately 33 feet below the ocean surface. Impacts in regards to recreational uses are not anticipated to be significant. Impacts from Oil and Gas Production Facilities: There are two offshore oil platforms approximately 1.5 miles west of the HBGS intake and four platforms approximately 10 miles west of the intake. There have not been any reportable spills or leaks from the offshore oil platforms or the pipelines. A catastrophic event at one of the offshore platforms that is near the coast could affect water quality at the HBGS intake. However, given the relatively low probability based on operational history, impacts in this regard are less than significant. Impacts from Operations at HBGS: There are numerous water quality constituents regulated in drinking water supplies. Samples were collected from the HBGS intake vault and from the outlet of the condensers (where the desalination facility intake will be located). Although maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) apply to treated drinking-water, raw water concentrations that exceed MCLs provide an indication of potential contaminants of concern. None of the primary MCLs are exceeded in the intake water and the only secondary MCLs that are exceeded are salts (TDS, chloride, sulfate) that would be removed by the reverse osmosis process. Impacts are less than significant in this regard. Cycle water is discharged to the cooling water system at various locations as the-cooling water flows through the generating station. The cycle water is under vacuum so the cooling water leaks into the cycle water but the cycle water does not leak into the cooling water. There are several locations where cycle water is discharged into the cooling water system. The contaminants in these discharges will be greatly diluted by the large volume of cooling water compared to the small volume of the discharges. The only chemical of concern in a drinking water source is nitrite. The other chemicals in the discharges are not toxic to humans and drinking water standards have not been established. Because the volume of cooling water represents a maximum of 0.002 percent of the cooling water flowing through one unit at the HBGS, the nitrite concentration of 800 mg/L will be diluted to about 0.02 mg/L in the cooling water that would reach the-desalination facility. This level of nitrite is well below the drinking water MCL of one mg/L. Nitrite and the other chemicals present in the cycle water discharges will easily be removed by the reverse osmosis membranes. As a result, impacts in this regard are less than significant. Storm runoff from the HBGS site and a limited amount of off site urban runoff is currently discharged to the cooling water system upstream of the intake to the desalination facility. The applicant would coordinate with HBGS to reroute these discharges during construction of the desalination facility so they would be downstream of the desalination intake and not affect water quality at the desalination intake. The off site urban runoff is from approximately 70 acres of land near the HBGS. Dry weather runoff collects in a ditch alongside Newland Street and is currently pumped into the HBGS outfall pipeline. The City of Huntington Beach plans to modify the system so that it flows into the HBGS site by gravity when improvements are made to Newland Street as part of the conditions placed upon the project by the City of Huntington Beach. Impacts are less than significant in this regard. Low volume wastes, metal cleaning wastes, and pipeline hydrostatic test water are diverted to the HBGS retention basin and then to the outfall, where the wastewater is mixed with cooling water. Currently this waste is discharged downstream of the intake to the desalination facility and would not be included in the source water for the proposed desalination facility. As a result, impacts in this regard are not anticipated to be significant. ri+"of ullntington Beach August, 2010 Item 5e - Page 52 Pa -304 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report A number of petroleum products and other hazardous materials are stored and used at the generating station. Although unlikely due to spill prevention measures and clean-up procedures in place at the HBGS, there is the potential for a spill to reach the floor drain or the storm drainage system and enter the cooling water system. The floor and yard drainage system currently enters the outfall line downstream of the point where the desalination facility will be located and would not be included in the desalination facility's source water. As a result, impacts in this regard are not anticipated to be significant. Periodically water from the discharge vault is diverted back into the facility and reheated. This reheated water is then used to clean the discharge line of biological growths ("bio-film"). This recirculated water contains wastes that have been discharged to the discharge vault prior to the flow being reversed in the facility. The proposed desalination facility would not intake water from the HBGS cooling water system during heat treatments. In this regard, impacts are less than significant. Impacts from Elevated Bacteria Levels in the Huntington Beach Surf Zone: As discussed in the SEIR, extensive bacterial studies have shown that the Santa Ana River and Talbert Marsh appear to be the primary sources of fecal indicator bacteria to the near shore ocean. In addition, bird droppings-and a reservoir of bacteria stored in the sediment and on marine vegetation may continue to be the source of bacteria at the mouths of the river and marsh. Modeling studies and monitoring data indicate that there is likely another unidentified source of bacteria in the vicinity-of Stations 6N and 9N. However, three separate studies conducted between 2001 and 2002 have demonstrated that HBGS is not the source of bacteria in the surf zone. Contaminants are not transported to the HBGS intake from the Santa Ana River and Talbert Marsh during extreme storm event conditions. In addition, dry weather urban runoff at Talbert Marsh during tidal flushing essentially does not reach the HBGS intake. Although the cause of the elevated bacteria levels in the Huntington Beach surf zone has not been determined, the seawater desalination process would have the ability to remove bacteria and produce potable water meeting all State Title 22 standards. Impacts in this regard are less than significant. Finding for Concentrated Seawater Discharge The proposed desalination project concentrated seawater discharge will not significantly impact ocean water quality or marine biological resources in the area. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.10 of the SEIR, the proposed project's discharge would not have a significant effect on organisms living around the discharge or organisms that would pass through the area. A suite of biological facts indicates that the combined thermal and reverse osmosis discharge would not be large enough to have a significant biological impact on the marine species or communities living near the HBGS (as the reverse osmosis process would not involve the heating or cooling of circulated ocean water, thermal impacts would not occur). Most of the marine organisms living near the HBGS also occur in areas of the SCB and beyond it where salinities can be greater than those that would occur in the combined reverse osmosis and HBGS discharge field. For example, the natural geographic distributions of most of the species living at Huntington Beach extend south to near the tip of Baja California where both coastal temperatures and salinities are as high or higher than those predicted for most areas in the combined discharge field. In addition, some of these species or ones very closely related to them live in the upper part of the Gulf of California where salinities are 36-38 ppt and can be as City of Huntington Beach Aual ict gni n Pa -3®5-,82 ` Item 5. - Page 53 Seawater DesalinationProject at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report high as 40 ppt. Thus, many of the species present in water around Huntington Beach naturally experience a salinity range comparable to or greater than what is predicted of the combined discharge area. Increased salinities of the HBGS flow will not cause a potential impairment of essential fish habitat (EFH) functions, and the project will not result in a significant impact or adverse affect on EFH. Hydrodynamic modeling for the project also finds that an elevated salinity zone would occur around the discharge core and that all organisms living within these areas would encounter it. For the animals swimming in the water (some macroinvertebrates, fishes, turtles, mammals), the duration of their elevated salinity exposure would depend on their location and their residence time in the zone. Such a brief exposure time would have no effect on marine mammals, turtles, or most fishes which are good osmoregulators and while most fishes are unlikely to prefer salinities this high, comparative data showing fish easily tolerate high salinities for shortperiods suggest these salinities could be tolerated for a short time. Also, fishes would have the ability to "sense" such a marked salinity change in the water and could thus alter their swimming direction to avoid it. In the case of organisms that drift across the elevated salinity area, models developed for the discharge flow field show that planktonic animals drifting though the discharge area would experience elevated salinity for variable times. These times would depend upon both the area of the zone and the organism's rate of drift and its position relative to the discharge core. Under low flow worst case scenario, exposure to the inner discharge core would be less than one hour and exposure to the core's periphery would be two to three hours. Short-term exposures to higher salinity levels can be tolerated with no impact to marine organisms. While plankton, fishes and other water-column residents would have relatively brief exposures to the highest salinities within the elevated salinity zone, this would not be the case for the benthic organisms occurring in the discharge area. Bottom-dwelling organisms living near the core would experience an increased salinity. One likely biological result of this elevated benthic salinity zone would be some reduction in the total diversity of species living within the zone and the likely increase in the concentration of species having a greater tolerance to the elevated salinity. Such species may already exist in the Huntington Beach bottom community or species from other nearby coastal habitats (tide pool, bays) where salinity is more variable may be recruited to this zone. Summary of Significance for Elevated Salinity Exposure Effects— Co-located Scenario The elevated salinity levels anticipated under the co-located operation scenario would conform to the discharge limitations established in Order No. R8-2006-0034, and would be less than significant. As further addressed in this analysis, the areas affected by salinities higher than 40 ppt would not represent substantial ecological effects due to the following factors. Therefore no significant impacts would result. • Benthic areas do not contain natural hard bottom habitats that support sensitive species • Fishes, plankton, and other pelagic animals that encounter elevated salinity in the discharge region will have very low exposure times (on the order of a few hours) • Foraging areas affected by elevated salinity are limited in.size, and would not represent a substantial displacement in foraging areas, or otherwise substantially affect foraging behavior rri+"of uiantington Beach August, 2010 Item 50 - Page 54 Pa -306;82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report . No threatened or endangered species or kelp beds exist within the vicinity of the HBGS outfall • No significant effects on EFH functions would occur Summary of Significance for Elevated Salinity Exposure Effects— Stand-alone Scenario The elevated salinity levels anticipated for the desalination facility in the stand-atone operation- scenario would maintain a salinity level of 40 ppt or less at 100 feet from the base of the- discharge tower (10% of the ZID), and will thereby comply with the Ocean Plan standards. Similar to the co-located condition, the areas affected by salinities higher than 40 ppt would not represent substantial ecological effects due to the following factors. Therefore no significant impacts would result. • Benthic areas do not contain natural hard bottom habitats that support sensitive species • Fishes, plankton, and other pelagic animals that encounter elevated salinity in the discharge region will have very low exposure times (on the order of a few hours) • Foraging areas affected by elevated salinity are limited in size, and would-not represent- - a substantial displacement in foraging areas, or otherwise substantially affect foraging_ behavior • No threatened or endangered species or kelp beds exist within the vicinity of the HBGS outfall • No significant effects on EFH functions would occur. Co-located Operation— Concentration Standards The Ocean Plan establishes receiving water concentration standards for the protection of aquatic habitat and human health for toxic metals, cyanide, chlorine residual, phenolic compounds, and several chlorinated organic compounds. The project (see above) is also not projected to result in any change in the Regional Board-assigned initial dilution value used for computing compliance with California Ocean Plan (COP) receiving water standards. Chemical comparisons show that all of the trace elements considered in the discharge analysis already occur in the source water and they have the same concentration off Huntington Beach coast as they do in coastal oceans throughout the world. Chemical and physical factor comparisons between the source water and the RO facility discharge stream demonstrate the "concentrating effect" of RO on the source seawater but also show that the RO operation will not significantly affect water turbidity, suspended solids, pH, and oxygen levels. Mass balance tests results were based on the assumption of a low HBGS flow rate and thus conservatively overestimate the concentration that would be expected under normal operation conditions. Nevertheless, the results show that while these trace elements will become slightly concentrated by RO, their discharge concentrations remain far below the numerical water quality standards established to protect aquatic marine life by the Environmental Protection Agency and by the State of California. The only change in discharge water chemistry resulting from the RO facility will be an elevation in dissolved iron. However, this concentration is low and, like the salinity difference between the discharge and receiving waters, the iron concentration will be rapidly diluted to ambient levels. There are no numerical water quality standards governing the discharge of iron, which is usually present in low concentrations in seawater. Moreover, iron is an important ocean nutrient (essential for the growth of City of Huntington Beach Aual let ?n1 n Pa -307-f 82 ` Item 5. - Page 55 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington-Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report phytoplankton) and is likely to be biologically assimilated by primary produce organisms (mainly phytoplankton) in the discharge plume. As illustrated in the SEIR,_discharge of the concentrated seawater would not exceed receiving water concentration standards related to aquatic habitat or human health, and therefore no significant impacts would result. Stand-alone Operation— Concentration Standards Because the stand-alone operating condition involves a larger flow volume than was assumed for the worst case co-located condition, and because the desalination facility discharges would contain the same concentrations of the same constituents, the stand-alone operating condition would have lower concentrations of seawater constituents than identified for the co-located condition. Discharge of the concentrated seawater would not exceed receiving water concentration standards related to aquatic habitat or human health, and therefore no significant impacts would result. Finding for Reverse Osmosis Membrane Cleaning Solution The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not significantly impact ocean water quality or marine biological resources due to the discharge of reverse osmosis membrane cleaning solution through the HBGS outfall. Less than significant impact. Facts in-Support of Finding As stated in the SEIR, for the co-located operation, the reverse osmosis system trains will be cleaned using a combination of cleaning chemicals such as industrial soaps (e.g. sodium dodecylbenzene, which is frequently used in commercially available soaps and toothpaste) and weak solutions of acids and sodium hydroxide. The "first rinse" treated waste cleaning solution from the washwater tank will be discharged into the local sanitary sewer for further treatment at the OCSD regional wastewater treatment facility. The cleaning rinse water following the "first rinse" will be mixed with the RO facility concentrated seawater, treated waste filter backwash, and the AES facility discharge and sent to the ocean. This "second rinse" water stream will contain trace amounts of cleaning compounds and would be below detection limits for hazardous waste. An Industrial Source Control Permit from the OCSD for discharge of waste cleaning solution into the sanitary sewer system will be required for the project. In addition, the discharge must comply with the limits and requirements contained in the OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations. An alternative to discharging the "first rinse" of the RO membrane cleaning solution into the OCSD system is to discharge the solution ("first rinse" and all subsequent rinses) into the Pacific Ocean via the HBGS outfall. On a typical day, this alternative would blend 200,000 to 300,000 gallons of cleaning solution at a rate of 150 to 200 GPM (0.2 to 0.3 MGD) with 50 MGD of concentrated seawater by-product discharge, 10-15 MGD of treated filter backwash, and 400 MGD of HBGS cooling water discharge. Under a low flow scenario (high membrane cleaning solution concentration and low concentrations of concentrated seawater discharge, filter backwash, and HBGS cooling water discharge), the membrane cleaning solution would be diluted at a ratio of 260:1. The majority of the chemicals within the membrane cleaning solution would be either below detection levels or regulatory limits, even before dilution with other desalination facility and HBGS discharges. Dilution at a 260:1 ratio would further minimize impacts to the marine environment and would assure NPDES compliance. Because the project's reverse osmosis cleaning solution first rinse discharge would not exceed regulatory limits of contaminants, no significant impacts would result. rri+„nf Nlantington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. o Page 56 pa -308 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Because the stand-alone operating condition involves a larger flow volume than was assumed for the worst case co-located condition, and because the volume of membrane cleaning solution would be the same as with the co-located condition, the stand-alone operating condition would have a higher mixing ratio, and lower concentrations of cleaning solution constituents than identified for the co-located condition. Because the project's reverse osmosis cleaning solution discharge would not exceed regulatory limits of contaminants, no significant impacts would result. Finding for Impingement and Entrainment The proposed desalination facility will have less than significant impacts on marine biological resources in regards to impingement and entrainment effects. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.10 of the SEIR, recent studies on the effects of the HBGS cooling water intake system on the ocean environment were conducted in connection with a re- powering project certified by the California Energy Commission (CEC). An Impingement Mortality and Entrainment (IM&E) Characterization Study (MBC and Tenera Environmental 2005) was submitted to the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board as part of the HBGS NPDES permit application that required compliance with provisions of the 316(b) Phase II regulations of the Clean Water Act. The sampling data collected in this 2003.2004 IM&E study were included as part of the desalination facility impingement and entrainment study conducted for the project. Co-located Operation The desalination facility's feedwater would be withdrawn from the HBGS discharge and not directly from the open ocean, and its withdrawal does not affect HBGS intake requirements. The project does not require the HBGS to increase the quantity of water withdrawn nor does it increase the velocity of the water withdrawn. The desalination intake study is designed to investigate the potential for desalination facility feedwater intake withdrawn from the HBGS cooling water system to increase HBGS entrainment mortality and assess the significance of this potential entrainment effect on the source water. The project source water intake would not increase the volume, or the velocity of the HBGS cooling water intake nor would it increase the number of organisms entrained or impinged by the HBGS cooling water intake system. The proposed desalination facility would not cause any additional impingement losses to the marine organisms impinged by the HBGS, as these organisms would not be exposed to further screening prior to entering the desalination facility's pretreatment system. The proposed desalination facility would not have a separate direct ocean water intake and screening facilities, and would only use cooling water that is already screened by HBGS's intake. Co-location of the desalination facility with the HBGS reduces the amount of source water required to be withdrawn directly from the ocean and avoids impingement impacts that would otherwise result from the siting and implementation of a new intake structure. Entrainment sampling for the desalination feedwater was conducted at an onshore point in the HBGS discharge line just before it is returned in conduits to an offshore discharge location. Bi- weekly samples were collected since the beginning of March 2004 by pumping measured volumes of cooling water discharges through small-mesh nets. Six taxa (gobies, blennies, croakers, northern anchovy, garibaldi, and silversides) and a group of larvae that could not be identified were found to comprise 97 percent of all the fish larvae present in the HBGS cooling City of Huntington Beach Aurlict gnin Pa -309- 82 `Item 5. - Page 57 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report water system from which the project would withdraw its source water supply. Species with high commercial and recreational importance, such as California halibut and rockfishes, were shown to be very uncommon in the HBGS intake flows. Under HBGS minimum intake cooling water flow of 127 MGD, and assuming 100 percent through-HBGS larval mortality (based on USEPA 2004), the estimated larval fish entrainment loss is 0.33 percent of the total population of larvae in the local area surrounding the HBGS intake. Based on in-facility testing,-the observed mortality of HBGS is 94.1 percent and the combined estimated mortality of the project and HBGS at flows of 507 MGD would be 95.3 percent (an increase in mortality of 1.2 percent due to the proposed desalination facility) and 98.7 percent at HBGS flows of 127 MGD (an increase in mortality of 4.6- percent due to the proposed desalination facility). This assessment assumes 100 percent mortality of all organisms upon withdrawal into the desalination facility. Estimated larval fish loss attributed to the proposed desalination facility would be 0.02 percent (based on HBGS entrainment mortality of 94.1 percent) of the total population of larvae in the local area surrounding the HBGS intake. This would-be an order of magnitude less-than the HBGS larval population entrainment loss of 0.33 percent. The 0.02 percent figure accounts for the incremental amount of larval fish loss-resulting from the proposed desalination facility, aside from that of the HBGS. From a regional perspective, model results for larval gobies, northern anchovy, and white croaker showed that approximately 0.33 percent of the larvae in the HBGS source water could be affected by HBGS operations at 127 MGD; this represents-a de minimis fraction of the total numbers of larval fishes in the Southern California Bight. Results were modeled on encounter rates for the most abundant species entrained from the source water. The loss of marine organisms due to the potential entrainment of the project has no effect on the species' ability to sustain their populations. Impacts on marine organisms due to the potential entrainment resulting from the co-located project would not substantially reduce populations of affected species, and would not affect the ability of the affected species to sustain their populations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Stand-alone Operation As noted in the discussion of elevated salinity effects, in order to achieve the anticipated required dilution of concentrated seawater, the desalination facility operating in the stand-alone condition would require a higher intake flow volume than was analyzed for the worst-case/low flow circumstances in the co-located condition. To further determine the potential effects of the project under stand-alone conditions on larval fishes and shellfishes, data from the 2003-2004 study were re-analyzed using a proposed intake volume of 152 MGD. The daily intake flow of 507 MGD used in impact assessment for the co-located condition was reduced to the proposed 152 MGD flow to model impacts from the desalination facility in a stand-alone operating condition. The most abundant species impinged were queenfish (81%), northern anchovy (6%), white croaker (3%), and shiner perch (2%). No threatened or endangered species were collected during the sampling. It should also be noted that the project is not within an Area of Special Biological Significance (ASBS). All of the other species comprised 1% or less of the total estimated impingement. The proposed operation of the HBGS intake system under stand-alone operation for the desalination facility would result in an estimated average daily impingement of 13 fishes weighing 0.3 kg (0.7 lb). The estimated average daily impingement rate for shellfish was approximately 7 individuals weighing 0.1 kg (0.2 Ib). The most abundant species were yellow crab (41%), graceful crab (19%), and Pacific rock crab (13%). Other shellfishes in impingement samples included shrimps, octopus, spiny lobster, and market squid. Impingement would not result in substantial reductions in fish or shellfish populations under stand- alone rrif"of Plintington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 58 Pa.-310 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report operating conditions. It is not anticipated that the small amount of impingement losses would have any effects on the ability of impinged species to sustain their populations, and therefore impacts would be less than significant. The total estimated number of fish larvae entrained annually, based on a pumping rate of 152 MGD, was 103,303,290. Ten taxa comprised approximately 91% of the total larvae collected: unidentified gobies, spotfin croaker, anchovies, queenfish, white croaker, salema, unidentified croakers, combtooth blennies, black croaker, and diamond turbot. Of the five target invertebrate taxa included in the study (cancrid crab megalops, market squid postlarvae, Pacific sand crab, California spiny lobster, and ridgeback rock shrimp) only Pacific sand crab and cancrid crabs were found in the entrainment samples. Pacific sand crab zoeae comprised almost 98% of the entrained target invertebrates. Almost all of the Pacific sand crab larvae collected were in the earliest stages of their larval development (zoea Stage 1); only two megalopal stage larvae were collected from entrainment samples and none were collected from source water samples. The most abundant taxon of larval fish-entrained (33%) was CIQ gobies, comprised of three species of small, bottom-dwelling types of fish that are common in bays and lagoons. Nearby adult populations are concentrated inl, localized habitats, such as Alamitos Bay, Anaheim Bay, and Talbert Marsh, and their larvae are dispersed in these environs and transported out into coastal waters by tidal flushing and prevailing currents. These larvae would experience high rates of natural mortality at the intake location, because the intake is located in an area that does not provide suitable habitat to sustain-resident adult populations, and there is a low likelihood that larvae that have been flushed into-the area of the intake would be able to return to the shallow bay habitats that meet the species life history requirements. Larval entrainment losses due to, operation of the project in the stand alone operating condition are projected to affect only a small fraction of the larvae (0.02-0.33%) of the source water populations of approximately ;115,000,000,000 (billion) individual larval fish at risk to entrainment, that occur within ! the project's source water. The IM&E studies at HBGS demonstrate estimated levels of, proportional mortality that are much less than the estimates from other coastal power plants in California. Impacts on marine organisms due to the potential entrainment resulting from the project are relatively small, and would not substantially reduce populations of affected species,; or affect the ability of the affected species to sustain their populations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. In regard to the potential indirect impacts on prey species of the California least tern, under either the co-located or stand-alone operating scenario, a study by Atwood and Kelly (1984) indicates that northern anchovy, topsmelt, jacksmelt, and deepbody or slough anchovies were the primary food sources for least terns in California. Based on the species' mobility, diversity of diet and lack of significant impacts on fish species (as discussed in relation to impingement and entrainment effects), California least terns (as well as other birds that utilize this area for foraging of fish species) are not, expected to be impacted by implementation of the project. There does not appear to be a 'substantial adverse effect on the species resulting from any reduction in prey species that could be attributable to the HBGS. Therefore, such effects would similarly not be anticipated with operation of the desalination facility operating in a stand-alone condition. K. IMPACTS RELATED TO PRODUCT WATER QUALITY (SE/R pages 4.11-1 to 4.11- 28) Section 4.12 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to product water quality. Those potential impacts are addressed in Section 4.0-K of this Statement of Findings of Facts. i City of Huntington Beach Aurl ic+ )ni n Pa.-311-`82 `Item 5. - Page 59 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report L. IMPACTS RELATED TO CLIMATE CHANGE (SEIR pages 4.12-1 to 4.12-34) Section 4.12 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts to climate change. Those potential impacts are addressed in this Section. Finding for Potential Impact to Climate Change The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not result in significant impacts to climate change. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As discussed in Section 4.12 of the SEIR, the SCAQMD significance threshold of 10,000 MTCO2E/yr for industrial projects is being utilized to assess the significance of the proposed project's GHG emissions, even though SCAQMD is not the lead agency. This threshold includes both operational emissions (direct and indirect) plus construction emissions. The proposed project would result in direct GHG emissions of 2,187 to 2,191 metric tons of CO2 during project construction, and 4,128 metric tons of CO2 aggregated over the 30 year life of the Project (424 MTCO2 per year) under both the co-located and stand-alone scenarios. Additionally, based on the information contained in Tables 4.12-4 through 4.12=6 in the SEIR, the proposed project would result in net indirect GHG emissions between 22,188 to 29,205 metric tons of CO2 per year for the co-located scenario, and 25,929 to 26,160 metric tons of CO2 per year under both the co-located and stand-alone scenarios. While these emissions are larger than the 10,000 MTCO2E/yr threshold, the proposed project has incorporated project design features included in its Energy Minimization and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan, which would offset the project's GHG emissions entirely, and as a result impacts would be less than significant. The proposed project would incorporate project design features that require a one-time purchase of GHG offsets or RECs for the Project's direct GHG emissions associated with Project construction and vehicle use during operation of the Project. This would offset direct emissions of 6,315 to 6,319 metric tons of CO2 (2,187 to 2,224 metric tons for construction and 4,128 metric tons for vehicle operations over the project's 30-year life). Project design features would require the purchase of offsets or RECs to cover estimated net indirect GHG emissions over the life of the project (equivalent to 22,188 to 29,205 metric tons of CO2 per year), as well as an annual reporting process to ensure that the applicant maintains a zero net GHG emissions balance. With incorporation of these project design features, the project would have a net zero increase in GHG emissions. Therefore, the project would have emissions below SCAQMD's 10,000 MTCO2E/yr threshold, and project impacts would be less than significant. Further, because the project design features require the project to maintain a zero net GHG emission balance, the project would not cause an increase in GHG emissions above the existing baseline, and therefore would have no GHG emission impact on the environment. The proposed project is also being evaluated based on whether it would conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gases. While AB 32 does not regulate the project's direct or indirect GHG emissions (and there are no other statewide GHG regulatory programs that are applicable to this project), the project is being evaluated on whether it would conflict with AB 32's statewide goals of reducing GHGs through actions such as energy efficiency, green building design, renewable energy generation and reduced water importation. r.i+„of Huntington Beach August, 2010 Item 5e - Page 60 Pa,-312-1:82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report I I The proposed project would incorporate project design features that reduce energy requirements (increased energy,efficiency, green building design, recovery of COZ, and potential on site solar—generation) in order to reduce its emissions. In addition, the project's design features include GHG offsets that would entirely offset the project's net GHG emissions above the existing baseline. With the incorporation of the project design features, project GHG reductions would result in a net zero emission of GHGs. As a result, the proposed project would not conflict with AB 32. In addition to the project resulting in no conflict with AB 32, the proposed project would not conflict with any other plans, policies, or regulations intended to reduce GHG emissions, as indicated below. The City of Huntington Beach has not adopted a Climate Action Plan or any other plan, policy, or regulation I adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs, and therefore the Project does not conflict with any such plan, policy or regulation. CARB's Scoping Plan provides an outline for actions to reduce California's GHG emissions. The Scoping Plan requires CARB and-other state agencies to adopt regulations and-other initiatives to reduce GHGs. At this time, no mandatory GHG regulations or finalized agency guidelines would apply to this project, and therefore the Project does not conflict with any such regulations— or guidelines. SB 375 addresses GHG emissions associated with the transportation sector through regional transportation and sustainability plans. SB 375 provides incentives for streamlining CEQA requirements by substantially reducing the requirements for "transit priority projects," as specified in SB 375, and eliminating the analysis of the impacts of certain residential projects on global warming and the growth-inducing impacts of those projects when the projects are consistent with the Sustainable Communities Strategy or Alternative Planning Strategy. The City is not anticipating a zone change',or change in land use for the proposed project site in response to SB 375, and because the proposed project consists of a seawater desalination facility and associated infrastructure, it would not result in a significant number of vehicle trips during the operational phase. As a result, the proposed project would not conflict with the goals of SB 375. As noted in the discussion of environmental setting, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Health and Safety Code Section 38501(a)), cites rising sea levels as a potential adverse impact of global warming. The sea level rise projected by the documented models described earlier in this section I spanned a fairly large range. However, it appears that the various projections for sea level rise could affect primarily the intake and discharge features of the project. The project site is proposed to be at elevations ranging from 9.0 to 14.0 feet above AMSL, with all building foundations above 10.0 feet AMSL. Therefore the project site will be protected from a potential two feet rise in sea level. In addition, earthen berms around the site are sufficient for protection from)surges that could occur from waters to the south. It is not anticipated that a rise in sea level lof up to 2 feet or more within the life span of the project would result in substantial increase in exposure of the project to potential adverse impacts. Accordingly, no significant impacts from this potential adverse effect of global warming, as identified in the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, would occur. Since the project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases, no significant impact would occur. M. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (SEIR pages 5-16 to 5-36) Section 5.3 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential cumulative impacts. All of the project's potential cumulative impacts are addressed in this Section, except for cumulative construction City of Huntington Beach Aucal le+ 9nl n Pa -313 82 'Item 5. - Page 61 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report related impacts regarding air quality. Potential cumulative construction related impacts regarding air quality are addressed in Section 5.0-A of this Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for Potential Local Cumulative Impacts The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not result in significant local cumulative impacts. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding Table 5-4 in Section 5.3 of the SEIR contains a list of all of the potential cumulative projects that have the potential to act in a cumulative manner with the proposed project in order to create potential impacts on the environment. Each impact category is discussed below. Land Use/Relevant Planning The proposed project is not considered to represent a significant cumulative land use or relevant planning impact,-as the project is consistent with the City of Huntington Beach General Plan. All projects taking place within the cumulative impact study area would conform to local and regional land use plans as well as applicable planning regulations governing current and future development. Mitigation of cumulatively significant land— use impacts are best accomplished by area-wide mitigation programs, conforming to the adopted zoning, and General Plan designations, and implementing project-specific mitigation measures where appropriate. Therefore, it is not anticipated that development of cumulative projects will result in a significant cumulative impact. Geology and Soils Cumulative effects related to earth resources resulting from the proposed project and development in the vicinity of the proposed project include short-term increases in erosion due to excavation, backfilling, and grading activities. These impacts are anticipated to be mitigated by enforcing proper erosion protection measures during remediation and construction of the proposed project, and would be mitigated on a project-by-project basis. In addition, sites with unsuitable development conditions, such as liquefaction and seismic hazards, are best mitigated on an individual basis. The proposed project and all projects located within the cumulative impact study area would comply with the Uniform Building Code and all erosion control measures established by the city with applicable jurisdiction, including all erosion and sedimentation avoidance and reduction measures contained in regional stormwater permits and related plan and requirements. Following construction of several projects within the cumulative impact area, revegetation of previously excavated areas would take place and habitat would be restored, which would reduce the potential of soil erosion. Because each project would require specific mitigation in conformance with regional standards, the cumulative impacts on geology and soils resources would be less than significant. Hydrology and Water Quality Cumulative impacts with regards to hydrology and water qualify would primarily result from off- site runoff containing urban pollutants, as the majority of the project site would be composed of impervious surfaces. However, as previously stated, the proposed desalination facility and all projects located within the cumulative impact study area would incorporate protection measures and/or site design BMPs to avoid hydrology and water quality impacts during operation. All site runoff would be directed to appropriate storm drains via an on-site local drainage system, ultimately being discharged into the Pacific Ocean via the HBGS outfall. In addition, impacts would be further minimized as the existing berm along the eastern perimeter of the project site (adjacent to the Huntington Beach Channel) would prevent runoff impacts to the adjacent rrif%/of wuntington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 62 Pa,-314;82 II Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental ImpaIct Report wetlands to the southeast. The desalination facility's discharge into the Pacific Ocean is not considered a significant cumulative impact, as discussed in Section 4.3, Hydrology and Water Quality. Similar to the impacts on geology and soils, hydrology and water quality impacts resulting from development of cumulative projects would be regularly subject to application of consistent regulatory requirements that have been put-in place to avoid and reduce significant effects on drainage and water quality. Therefore, it is not anticipated that development of cumulative projects would result in significant cumulative effects on hydrology and water quality. Air Quality I The proposed project and other, projects in the area will result in temporary air quality impacts from construction-related activities and vehicle emissions. Such activities could result in substantial temporary emissions of particulate matter (PM10, PM2_5) and carbon monoxide (CO). Because air quality is defined by geographic formations (i.e., a coastal plain surrounded by mountains) and bears little relationship to jurisdictional boundaries, the cumulative impact analysis study area for air quality consists of the South Coast Air Basin. The projects known to be planned or approved, or in construction during the preparation of this SEIR, are summarized in Table 5-4 and are part of growth forecasts considered in regional air quality planning for purposes of evaluating long-term operational cumulative impacts. SCAG and the South Coast Ailr Quality Management District prepared a regional air quality analysis as part of the 2008 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). That analysis serves as a cumulative analysis of project impacts to regional air quality, because it incorporates all past, present and future planned development within the region. Currently the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment for ozone, PM,o, and PM2.5; therefore, an existing cumulative ozone and PM10/PM2,5 air pollution issue exists within-the South Coast Air Basin. The proposed project itself would generate emissions from vehicle trips that would not exceed thresholds and would not include any permanent stationary sources. As discussed in Section 5.2 in the SEIR, the proposed project would not induce population and/or employment growth and would therefore conform to the RTP. Therefore, the proposed project would not contribute in a cumulatively considerable manner to cumulative long-term air quality impacts, and impacts would be less than significant. Climate Change Changes in the global climate ;attributable to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are cumulative effects of past, present, and future actions worldwide. While worldwide contributions of GHG emissions are expected'ito have environmental consequences, it is not possible to link particular changes to the environment of California to GHGs emitted from a particular source or location. However, when considering a project's contribution to impacts from climate change, it is possible to examine the quantity of GHG emissions that would be either directly or indirectly attributable to a project. An analysis of such project-level effects is presented in Section 4.12 of the SEIR. Section 4.12 addresses the project's contribution to the cumulative effects of climate change based on guidance provided by the California Natural Resources Agency. As noted in Section 4.12 of the SEIR, since the project design features and mitigation measures identified for the project would entirely offset the project's contribution to the cumulative effects of greenhouse gas emissions, the project's effects relative to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change are not cumulatively considerable,. Noise As with the proposed project, cumulative projects would generate periodic increases in ambient noise levels in the project area during construction. Several cumulative projects in the City of Huntington Beach Auglief Wnln Pa-315-182 Item 5. - Page 63 i Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report surrounding area anticipate periodic noise levels in excess of established standards during construction, thereby exposing people and noise-sensitive receptors to these increased levels. Through mitigation measures, including conformance with construction noise restrictions through local ordinances, these cumulative short-term impacts will be reduced to below a level of significance. Potential long-term noise associated with the proposed project would be generated by both mobile and stationary sources. Although cumulative development of the project vicinity is anticipated to result in increases in noise levels within the City, the project's long-term operational traffic -noise is anticipated to be nominal, and on-site stationary noise sources would be properly attenuated. Therefore, the project's contribution to a potentially significant cumulative long-term noise impact would not be cumulatively considerable and would be less than significant. Public Services and Utilities The proposed desalination facility may have impacts on wastewater facilities due to the potential discharge of byproduct wastes associated with facility operation utilizing OCSD facilities. However, the OCSD would require a commercial/industrial connection fee, of which 5% would go to the City. Impacts in this regard have been adequately analyzed in previous documentation, as the proposed project would be in compliance with all General Plan and Zoning designations. Cumulative impacts are not anticipated to be significant in this regard. As discussed in Section 4.6 in the SEIR, project-level impacts on other public services and utilities are less than significant and would not represent a cumulatively considerable contribution to any significant cumulative impacts. Aesthetics/Light and Glare Temporary construction impacts and facility operation would change the aesthetic character of the project site vicinity. The project site exists as a portion of a former fuel storage facility, with storage tanks 40 feet in height. The proposed project is expected to improve the overall aesthetic character of the site vicinity by replacing the storage tanks with multiple tilt-up buildings/structures. These structures would incorporate aesthetic enhancements (landscaping, screening, and aesthetically sensitive architecture) and are expected to enhance the overall aesthetic character of the site vicinity. In addition, the proposed desalination project may introduce new sources of lighting to the area. However, appropriate mitigation measures to prevent the occurrence of significant amounts of light spillover would be incorporated into site design. All structures associated with the proposed project would comply with City standards with regards to building height, densities, and landscaping. Additionally, several projects located within the cumulative impact study area include plans for parks recreational facilities construction and expansion, and/or on-site landscaping associated with development projects. These site design features and parks improvements will positively augment the area's existing scenic resources and improve the aesthetic character of the region. Therefore, when combined with current and reasonably foreseeable future projects, the proposed project would not generate cumulatively significant aesthetic impacts within the surrounding area. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The proposed project has positive public health and safety effects due to remediation of the former fuel storage tank facility. Cumulatively, other project sites that are constrained due to site contamination would require remediation on a case-by-case basis, including the Magnolia Pacific Specific Plan, which plans to develop on the previous Ascon/Nesi Landfill; and the Edison Community Center (located at 21377 Magnolia Street, north of Hamilton Avenue and outside of the pipeline construction route), which would pursue mitigation for methane issues currently affecting the site. Remediation activities would be done in accordance with applicable health and safety regulations. The proposed project may have local impacts in regards to r'i+A1 r%f Plantington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 64 Pa.-316 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report hazards and hazardous materials through various chemicals associated with facility operation. However, all hazardous materials would be used, stored, and transported according to all Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations. Therefore, it is not anticipated that cumulative impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials would be significant. Construction-Related Biological Resources (Terrestrial Only) Implementation of the proposed off-site OC-44 underground booster pump station may have impacts on biological resources. The site is currently undeveloped and includes 0.5 acre of native vegetation known to support numerous species of wildlife and may include areas within the jurisdiction of the ACOE or CDFG according to Appendix B, Results of the Biological Constraints Survey for the OC-44 Underground Booster Pump Station Project Site, of the SEIR. Construction of the proposed pump station has the potential to impact biological resources. However, mitigation--measures are included to ensure that avoidance of direct impacts is accomplished with -final- design (refer to Mitigation Measures CON-38 through CON-46 in Section 4.9, Construction in the SEIR). Once built, the pump station would be placed entirely underground and would be subject to development restrictions protecting the integrity of on-site biological resources. Neither of the optional OC-44 underground booster pump station sites contains sensitive species or habitats, and neither has jurisdictional wetlands/waters. Therefore, the project would not have a substantial adverse effect on candidate, sensitive, or special-status species, nor would it affect any federally protected wetlands. Therefore impacts at the optional sites would be less than significant. Regulatory compliance during project construction would ensure that project-related construction activities would minimize cumulative impacts to less than significant levels. In addition, cumulative projects would undergo separate environmental review. Construction-Related Traffic As discussed in Section 4.9 of the SEIR, implementation of the proposed project may cause short-term, construction-related traffic impacts. The demolition, remediation, and construction process would generate traffic in the site vicinity through on-site construction worker vehicle trips and truck trips. Construction truck trips to and from the project site would utilize routes that would minimize impacts, and impacts would be further avoided and minimized through use of traffic control measures. Pipeline construction for product water delivery would also require temporary disruption along public streets, as the majority of the pipeline is proposed to be installed within existing street right of way (ROW) utilizing open trench construction methods. Adequate staging areas would be provided for both-open trench and trenchless construction in order to minimize the amount of traffic disruption. Pipeline construction may conflict with remediation activities at the Ascon landfill site. A Draft Interim Removal Measure Workplan for the landfill (California Department of Toxic Substance Control 2009) identifies the various routes of travel for trucks entering and exiting the landfill site. The proposed routes include Newland Street and Hamilton Street, both of which will involve construction of the proposed water delivery pipelines. It is anticipated that there will be overlap between construction of the pipelines and material hauling from the landfill. Both projects will be required to maintain traffic control plans, but coordination between the two efforts will be important. With the possibility of simultaneous project construction and landfill remediation, there is the potential for significant impacts on traffic and circulation, and mitigation is required. With the mitigation measure identified in Section 4.9, localized impacts resulting from cumulative construction impacts of the project and the Ascon landfill remediation would be less than significant. City of Huntington Beach Aurl ic+ on1 n Pa -317 82 HeFn 5. - Page 65 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Since the timeframe for construction of the project and associated water delivery pipelines is relatively short, and since pipeline construction would proceed relatively quickly through each segment being constructed, it is not anticipated that a substantial increase in current traffic levels resulting from other cumulative development will occur prior to completion of project construction. Therefore, temporary traffic impacts associated with the project will cease prior to substantial cumulative traffic impacts being realized on local roadways. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to any significant cumulative traffic impacts. Construction-Related Cultural Resources According to CEQA, the importance of cultural resources comes from their research value and the information that they contain. Therefore, the issue that must be explored in a cumulative analysis is the cumulative loss of information. For sites considered less than significant, the information is preserved through recordation and test excavations. Significant sites that are placed in open space easements avoid impacts to cultural resources and also preserve the data. Significant sites that are not placed within open space easements preserve the information through recordation, test excavations, and data recovery programs. The cumulative impacts analysis for cultural resources considered the area surrounding the proposed desalination facility and off-site facilities, and specifically the projects listed in Table 5- 4. Impacts to cultural resources related to cumulative development that occurs within the areas surrounding the desalination facility and associated off-site facilities could be significant if significant cultural resources are destroyed as a result of development. Section 4.9 of the SEIR provides a comprehensive summary of all potential project impacts to cultural resources, as a result of the records search, literature review, and field survey conducted for the proposed project. The project would not result in any significant impacts on cultural resources, and therefore would not represent a cumulatively considerable contribution to any significant cumulative impact. Product Water Quality The product water from the seawater desalination facility would be suitable for delivery through the existing water distribution system and would be comparable to and compatible with the other water sources currently delivering water to the same system (see Section 4.11, Product Water Quality in the SEIR). Thus, cumulative impacts would be less than significant. Finding for Potential Regional Cumulative Impacts The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not result in significant regional cumulative impacts. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding Projects that may result in regional cumulative impacts include existing and/or planned developments along the California coast that could exceed planned growth estimates, contribute to impacts to the Southern California Bight, and/or result in substantial demands on local power sources, resulting in additional water or air pollution. See Table 5-5 in the SEIR. As discussed in Section 5.2 in the SEIR, the proposed project would not foster growth in excess of that already assumed and projected in pertinent planning documents. Moreover, existing water supply plans already project that seawater desalination would play a necessary role in meeting projected future demands. Accordingly, the growth-inducing impacts of the project are not significant. Each incremental development would be required to comply with the goals and (-i+%/of"lantington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 66 Pa.-318 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report policies of the applicable General Plan or other planning documents for the proposed project area. Thus, potential growth-inducing cumulative impacts would be less than significant. Ocean Water Quality and Marine Biological Resources The Southern California Bight is a region that includes coastal Southern California, the Channel Islands, and the local portion of the Pacific Ocean. The small portion of the Pacific Ocean that occupies this region, from Point Conception in the north to-just past San Diego in the south, and extending offshore of San Nicolas Island, is the temporary or permanent home to a wide variety of marine organisms. Impacting this coastal marine--ecosystem are the millions of people who reside in the Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego metropolitan areas, as well as the Mexican residents who inhabit the Tijuana/San Diego border region of the Bight. The tremendous population of Southern California, coupled with the activities necessary to -sustain and/or enhance their existence, results in a significant quantity and variety of pollutants that enter coastal waters. The Pacific Ocean within the Southern California Bight area receives pollutants from a wide variety - of sources. Most pollution within the-Bight is derived from land, from water runoff-after a rainfall event, from the outfall pipes of wastewater treatment facilities, or from the water discharges of electrical power plants. Such runoff can introduce a mix of industrial and organic pollutants to coastal waters. Additionally, substantial amounts of refuse also make their way into rivers or bays via roadway gutters. Harbor/port activities also contribute pollution to the Southern California Bight. Combined, the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles compose one of the busiest port systems in the nation. Though stringent guidelines are in place to protect the coastal environment, pollution from ships, from the ports' terminals, and from the Los Angeles River is an ongoing problem. Discharge from the ballast tanks of ships, though illegal, does occur. Such vessels, arriving from distant ports of call, can introduce exotic species of plants and animals, causing disruption of the local food web. Discharges rich in nitrogen can generate the rapid growth of plankton, eventually leading to a condition known as red tide that is lethal to some coastal organisms. Implementation of the proposed project may contribute to long-term impacts to water quality and marine biological sources. However, as stated in Section 4.10, Ocean Water Quality and Marine Biological Resources, in the SEIR, all potentially significant impacts to long-term water quality and marine biological sources would be reduced to less-than-significant levels through regulatory compliance, project design features, and implementation of the recommended mitigation measures pertaining to hydrology and water quality. The following discussion describes the potential for cumulative impacts to the Southern California Bight. As discussed in Section 4.10 of the SEIR, oceanographers from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography conducted modeling simulating ocean conditions near the HBGS intake and outfall. The model calculates the degree of mixing of various potential contaminant sources with the Pacific Ocean. The Santa Ana River, Talbert Marsh, OCSD wastewater discharge outfall, and proposed desalination facility discharge were all investigated. Seawater contamination resulting from any of the above sources could potentially impact the quality of product water and, to some degree, the quality of byproduct concentrated seawater to be discharged from the HBGS outfall. The model results show the amount of dilution of each of these sources of pollutants under different oceanographic conditions. The results of the model concluded that long-term water quality impacts to the Pacific Ocean would be less than significant. Additionally, the analysis concluded that the mixture of the proposed facility's concentrated seawater discharge with the HBGS cooling water discharge would not result in salinity increases that would significantly impact marine biological resources. The analysis to marine biological resources also concludes that plankton entrained in the discharge stream are likely to be killed City of Huntington Beach Auglict gnin Pa,-319 82 Item 5e - Page 67 Seawater Desalination Project-at-Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report as much by the turbulence and temperature of the discharge (which would occur even without proposed project implementation) as by the salinity increase. Thus, no significant increase in plankton loss is expected from the addition of the byproduct water to the discharge stream. Since implementation of the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts to ocean water quality and marine life, the analysis of cumulative impacts must include an analysis of the expected environmental effects to be produced by other cumulative projects. As shown in Table 5-5 of the SEIR, 11, desalination facilities are currently being proposed along the Southern California coast that would contribute to cumulative impacts associated with the proposed project.—Seawater desalination projects outside of Southern California (approximately 11_-are proposed) have no potential to interact with the proposed project. Additionally, existing and proposed ports, wastewater treatment facilities, industrial uses, etc., along the coast would contribute to cumulative impacts. The proposed desalination facilities and other anthropogenic uses would be required to ensure that the objectives and goals defined in the California Ocean Plan and the Water Quality Control Plan for Control of Temperature in the Coastal and Interstate Waters and Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California are met on a project-by-project basis. These plans identify water quality goals-and objectives that pertain to: • Thermal characteristics (control of temperature in the coastal and interstate waters and enclosed bays and estuaries of California (Thermal Plan)) • Bacterial characteristics, physical characteristics (i.e., visible floating particulates, grease, oil, and discoloration) • Chemical characteristics (i.e., dissolved oxygen concentration, pH, amounts of dissolved sulfide, nutrient materials, and other harmful substances) • Biological characteristics (i.e., effects to marine communities, including vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant species) • Radioactivity (radioactive waste discharge). Because each proposed desalination facility would have unique design and siting characteristics, each is likely to be subject to a different set of California Coastal Act policies and would likely conform to those policies in different ways. Determining whether a proposed desalination project would conform to the California Coastal Act would therefore be done on a case-by-case basis. The physical effect of desalting seawater by reverse osmosis is in principle no different than the effects of evaporation. Ocean surveys of the Southern California Bight have measured evaporative losses at 93.4 centimeters per year. The surface area of the coastal waters inside the continental margin of the Southern California Bight is approximately 160,000 square kilometers. Factoring in evaporation over the surface area, it is concluded that the coastal area of the Southern California Bight loses 1.49 by 10" cubic meters of pure water constituent from the coastal ocean each year. In contrast, a desalination facility producing product water at a rate of 50 mgd will extract 6.9 by 107 cubic meters of pure water constituent of water from the coastal ocean in 1 year's time. Consequently, it would take 2,163 desalination facilities the size of the proposed project to match the natural evaporative losses from the ocean in the Southern California Bight. The report Marine Biological Issues for the Huntington Beach Desalination Project and Other Desalination Facilities in the appendices of the SEIR contains an analysis and compilation of studies and information from currently operating desalination facilities around the world to rrif%l of Huntington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 68 Pa -320 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report determine the effects of elevated salinity levels. The study found that the Huntington Beach desalination facility's strategy of avoiding impacts by adequately diluting and dispersing the concentrated seawater is consistent with practices of other plants. Review of recently published information about the collective worldwide experience with the operation--of large seawater desalination plants in Australia and at Tampa Bay (ltS) indicates a positive track record for minimizing the potential effects of seawater concentrate discharge. An increased awareness of the environmental impact of discharging undiluted seawater concentrate into coastal waters has prompted monitoring studies of this effect in existing plants as well as increased attention to this issue in both the design and placement of desalination facilities. Prior experience shows that the discharge of concentrated seawater into shallow coastal areas that are not well ventilated by tidal or wind-driven circulation may cause elevation of coastal salinity and may affect the biota occurring in the discharge area. By contrast, in cases where the discharge is either diluted (as it is in the case of the Huntington Beach facility) or lessened by mixing with the receiving water-, the effects are either reduced or are not present at all. When viewed in conjunction with other proposed desalination facilities and anthropogenic uses planned for the Southern California coast, the potential degradation of marine biological resources and long-term water quality could be considered a negative cumulative impact. However, given the dispersion and physical distance from the proposed desalination facility to other Southern California desalination facilities, there would not be any overlapping impacts. Furthermore, the proposed project includes mitigation measures relevant to the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), specifically identifying BMPs, a site-specific hydrology and hydraulic analysis, and installation of an on-site storm drainage system to ensure that long-term water quality impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, potential impacts of cumulative projects would be site-specific, and an evaluation of potential impacts would be conducted on a project-by-project basis. This would be especially true of those developments located in areas that contain sensitive species and habitat. Each incremental development would be required to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations concerning the protection of biological resources and degradation of water quality. In consideration of these regulations, potential cumulative impacts upon ocean water quality and marine biological resources are considered less than significant under both co-located and stand-alone operating conditions for the project. Related to this analysis is a cumulative effects analysis conducted by the SWRCB. At page 35 of the March 22, 2010, Draft Final Substitute Environmental Document prepared by the SWRCB for its proposed Water Control Policy on the use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling, the SWRCB examined the effects of continuation of the baseline conditions for once-through-cooling water intake by coastal power plants. The study found that cumulative impacts are especially important in the Southern California Bight where many power plants are situated within several miles from each other. The SWRCB noted a study performed by MBC and Tenera in 2005 which estimated that, for 12 coastal power plants in the Southern California Bight, there is an overall cumulative entrainment mortality of up to 1.4% of the larval fishes in the Bight. In the same study, for eleven coastal power plants in the same area, the estimated cumulative impingement was approximately 3.6 million fish. Considering only recreational fish species, impingement was somewhere between 8% and 30% of the number of fish caught in the Southern California Bight. If the SWRCB policy is adopted and implemented as currently contemplated, these impacts would be expected to reduce over time. Power Production City of Huntington Beach Auctsict ?n1n Pa-321 82 Item 5. a Page 69 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF-FACTS-- Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Information regarding power production is based upon the Huntington Beach Desalination Project Report on Local and Regional Power Requirements and Generation Resources (Navigant Consulting, Inc. 2004, Appendix G„ Local and Regional Electric Power Requirements and Generation Resources, to the SEIR). According to this report, the estimated load for the proposed project is 30 to 35 MW, and it is anticipated that it would be operating at this level unless the HBGS conducts its heat treatment process. Southern California--Edison (SCE) and other utilities routinely develop forecasts of electrical loads on their systems. Most times the publicly available information resulting from these forecasts is aggregated such that the only data available are that for the load served from the major substations or on a system-wide basis. The assessment of-impacts to power production as a result of project implementationhas been based upon the following: • Extracted information on the estimated amounts of power delivered through each of SCE's major 230 and 115-kilovolt (kV) substations (SCE 2004). • Information regarding the total peak loads on the systems of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), the other municipal utilities in the Los Angeles Basin, and the Imperial Irrigation District (Navigant Consulting, Inc. 2002). The SCE system in the Los Angeles Basin consists of: • A 230 kV transmission network that delivers power to a number of 230/66 kV substations • 66 kV lines that interconnect the 230 kV substations with numerous 66 kV substations from which the power is delivered to lower voltage facilities that ultimately serve the load. Table 5-6 in the SEIR, contains information relative to the location of the 230 kV substations, as well as estimates of the amount of the total SCE load in Orange County, that is served from each substation. In addition to SCE substations listed in Table 5-6, the Lewis 230/66 kV Substation, located in Anaheim, serves the electrical load in the City of Anaheim. The project load is anticipated to be as much as 35 megawatts starting in the fourth quarter of 2013. Table 5-8 in the SEIR presents information on the amounts by which the estimated loads summarized in Table 5-7 would increase when a 35-megawatt project load is added to them. Table 5-8 shows that the addition of the 35-megawatt project load would increase the demand for electric energy in the Huntington Beach area by approximately 9%. However, the impact of the addition of this load on the demand for electric energy in Orange County or Southern California is insignificant (less than 1%). Thus, impacts would be less than significant. In addition, a report published by the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and Pacific Institute states that the California State Water Project is the single largest user of energy in California, utilizing 2% to 3% of all electricity consumed in the state (NRDC and Pacific Institute 2004). This electricity consumption is necessary to lift water 2,000 feet over the Tehachapi Mountains (the highest lift of any water system in the world). Operation of the Colorado River Aqueduct adds to the electricity consumed in pumping water to Southern California. As stated in Section 4.4, Air Quality, imported water and desalinated water require in excess of 3,000 kilowatt hours (kWh) per acre-foot for production and distribution. The energy required to import water is expected to remain fairly static, while the energy required to desalinate seawater rit„„f N,antington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 7® Pa -322 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report is expected to continue to decrease. The proposed desalinated water has the potential to replace a given water provider's water curtailed from the State Water Project along the East Branch; then the power requirements to move imported water through the Central Valley, over the Tehachapi Mountains, and into the Los Angeles Basin could result in substantial power reductions, thus resulting in air quality offsets. Whereas the proposed facility under the co- located scenario has an "all in" power rate of 4,449 kWh per acre-foot for producing water and conveyance into the Orange County system, the State Water Project has a power rate of 3,200 kWh per acre-foot (net of hydroelectric power production in the Los Angeles Basin). As such, there is only a 1,249 kWh per acre foot increase (or an additional 194 megawatts per day) in energy consumption over current supplies into the MWD's Diemer water treatment facility. Under the stand-alone scenario, the facility would have a power rate of 4,776 kWh per acre-foot, which would result in an increase of 242 megawatts per day as compared to the energy used to import the same amount of water. N. GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS (SEIR pages-5-15 to 5-16) Section 5.2 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential growth-inducing impacts. Potential project-related growth-inducing impacts in Orange County are addressed in this Section. Potential indirect growth--inducing impacts outside of Orange County are addressed in Section 5.0-B of this Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for Potential Growth-Inducing Impacts The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not result in project-related significant growth-inducing impacts in Orange County. Less than significant impact. Facts in Support of Finding As required under CEQA, Section 5.2 of the SEIR included a discussion of the ways in which the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach could be growth-inducing. The seawater desalination project would provide a new source of potable water supply (desalinated seawater) producing 50 million gallons per day (mgd), or 56,000 acre-feet per year, of potable water for ultimate use within Orange County. However, as described in Section 3.0, Project Description, the desalinated seawater would not be made directly available to end users. Instead, the project requires that the desalinated seawater produced by the seawater desalination project be delivered only to existing regional or local water purveyors in Orange County. By August, 2010, in addition to an agreement through the OPA with the City of Huntington Beach, 17 retail water purveyors and MWDOC had each signed individual Letters of Intent indicating their conditional interest in entering purchase agreements with Poseidon to purchase specific amounts of desalinated seawater in each year that water is produced at the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach. Section 3.5 in the SEIR provides a list of the water purveyors that have signed a letter of Intent with Poseidon. Three additional agencies have indicated interest in purchasing water from the project. Because the entire 56,000 acre-feet of desalinated seawater to be produced by the project has been reserved, the growth-inducing impact of the project would depend entirely upon how those regional or local water purveyors allocate the desalinated seawater produced by the project. Neither CEQA nor the CEQA Guidelines provide a specific methodology for determining whether a project like the proposed project would have growth-inducing impacts. One methodology would be to assume a scenario in which water produced by the seawater City of Huntington Beach Aup le+ ?nl n Pa -323-;82 Item 5. - Page 71 -Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS -Subsequent Environmental Impact Report desalination project was directed by regional and local water purveyors entirely toward fostering unplanned growth in Orange County. At 200-gallon-per-day per capita water use, the project could supply water to 250,000 additional people, or approximately 8% more than Orange County's 3,000,000 current residents. When the County's population exceeds 3,600,000 residents in 2035 (see Table 5-1 in the SEIR), the project would be able to serve approximately 7% of that projected population. Allocating the project's water supply entirely toward fostering unplanned growth in Orange- County is not realistic because existing water supply plans for Orange County identify desalinated seawater as one of the additional water sources already counted upon to meet the future supply needs for projected population increases. As set forth in Section 3.5, the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach provides a new source of supply to offset any imported water supply losses experienced by Orange County. Further, it is not anticipated that the purchase of water from a different supplier (Poseidon) by any of the affected water agencies would result in any changes to existing land use plans, growth projections or growth management policies of the local land use authorities within the respective service areas of -those water agencies. Local water agencies purchase and deliver water to retail customers, and do not have direct authority over land use, and cannot approve or disapprove any changes in land use that would directly affect population projections. -Under CEQA, growth inducement is not considered necessarily detrimental, beneficial, or of -little significance to the environment. Typically, the growth-inducing potential of a project would be considered significant if it fosters growth or a concentration of population in excess of what is assumed in pertinent general plans, or in projections made by regional planning agencies. In consideration of population/housing projections within the Orange County and the recognized need (in Orange County water supply plans) for seawater desalination as a supply source, any impacts would be less than significant. The Growth Assessment and General Plan Evaluation (see the appendices in the SEIR) examines planned growth in Orange County and demonstrates that the potential water supply from the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach is not currently being-relied upon to serve any of the planned new development projects of 500 dwelling units for which water -supplies have been confirmed. The project will not supply water in excess of what is already anticipated to meet future projected needs in Orange County. Therefore, the Project will not cause significant growth-inducing impacts in Orange County. -4.0 FINDINGS FOR SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS The following issues were determined to be "less than significant with mitigation" as set forth in the SEIR. The City of Huntington Beach finds that these potentially significant adverse impacts can be mitigated to a level that is considered less than significant after implementation of the existing City development review requirements, standards, codes, and the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR. Mitigation measures are referenced in this Statement of Findings of Facts using the same numbering system employed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program and the SEIR. Refer to the MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM for a complete listing of mitigation measures and monitoring requirements. A. IMPACTS RELATED TO LAND USE/RELEVANT PLANING rri+"of wuntington Beach August, 2010 Item 50 - Page 72 Pa.-324-1:82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Section 4.1 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to land use/relevant planning. Those impacts are addressed in Section 3.0-A of this Statement of Findings of Facts. B. -IMPACTS RELATED TO GEOLOGY, SOILS, &SEISMICITY (SEIR pages 4.2-1 to 4.2- 16) Section 4.2 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to geology, soils and seismicity. The SEIR addresses six topics, four of which are addressed in this Sectior� The remaining topics are addressed in Section 3.0-13 of this Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for Wind/Water Erosion The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have significant impacts during operation of the project, but may create significant impacts in regards to wind and water erosion during construction. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including implementation of measures identified in the Erosion Control Plan to be submitted to the City's Department of Public Works with the grading permit (refer to Section 4.9, Construction-Related Impacts, in the SEIR for more detail) and mitigation measure HWQ-1. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.2 of the SEIR, the potential impacts related to wind and water erosion have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of project design considerations, standard conditions and mitigation measure HWQ-1, all of which have been incorporated into the project. The site would be either landscaped or paved, thereby reducing the likelihood for long-term operational wind/water erosion impacts to less than significant levels. However, the project would involve construction processes possibly causing wind and water erosion to occur during grading activities. The project would be subject to standard erosion control practices as typically required by the City. Any potential temporary increase in wind/water erosion during construction would be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of measures identified in the Erosion Control Plan to be submitted to the City's Department of Public Works with the grading permit. Any potential permanent increase in wind/water erosion would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with landscaping in areas not paved (refer to Figure 3-16, Conceptual Landscape Master Plan, in the SEIR). The proposed project will require a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to minimize wind and water erosion impacts. Finding for Geology/Soils The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may be subject to significant impacts resulting from unstable soils and shallow groundwater conditions in the vicinity of the project area. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including adherence to standard Uniform Building Codes (UBC) conditions and incorporation of mitigation measures GEO-5 through GEO-9, inclusive. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Findings City of Huntington Beach Aurl act 9n1 n Pa -325- 82 ` Hem 5. - Page 73 Seawater Desalination Project at-Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report As explained in Section 4.2 of the SEIR, the potential impacts related to geology/soils have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by incorporation of mitigation measures. These mitigation measures include submitting a detailed geotechnical report, the submittal of application for a precise grading permit, approval of the geotechnical report by the City Engineer, all dewatering activities will be in compliance with NPDES regulations, compressible soils will be removed and recompacted or the use of piles or grade beams will be used to support on site structures, and type V cement will be used for concrete and buried metal pipes shall utilize special measure to protect against the effects of corrosive soils. With the incorporation of such measures, impacts related to unstable soils and shallow groundwater conditions will be rendered less than significant. Finding for Seismicity/Faulting The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may be subject to significant hazards from seismicity and faulting. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including adherence to standard UBC conditions and incorporation of mitigation measures GEO-1 and GEO-4. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.2 of the SEIR, adequate measures shall be taken to protect building foundations and on site pipelines from the effects of seismicity and faulting. As a part of desalination operations, the operations staff would develop an earthquake mitigation and preparedness plan that would be coordinated with the local jurisdiction's preparedness activities. This plan would define coordination measures to ensure continuous facility operations and water delivery under earthquake emergency conditions. The proposed project and associated improvements, including an on site 66 kilovolt (kV) substation, would be constructed in compliance with the seismic safety requirements of the UBC and applicable CDMG publications. Given the site's proximity to the Newport-Inglewood and Compton Blind Thrust faults, more stringent design measures may be warranted or required, as determined by the site-specific geotechnical survey for the project. All structures would be designed in accordance with the seismic design requirements of the most recent edition of the UBC. The specific design provisions (e.g., wall and slab thickness, lateral bracing, structural configuration) for seismic enforcement would be developed during the design phase of this project. In addition, a detailed construction-level geotechnical study would be prepared during the design phase of the project. This report would include analysis regarding soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations for grading, chemical and fill properties, liquefaction and landscaping. The grading plan for the proposed project shall contain the recommendations of the final soils and geotechnical report. The recommendations shall be implemented in the design of the project, including but not limited to the measures associated with site preparation, fill placement, temporary shoring and permanent dewatering, groundwater seismic design features, excavation stability, foundations, soil stabilization, establishment of deep foundations, concrete slabs and pavements, surface drainage, cement type and corrosion measures, erosion control, shoring, and internal bracing and plan review. With the incorporation of such measures, impacts related to seismicity and faulting will be less than significant. Finding for Liquefaction Potential The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may be subject to significant hazards due to high liquefaction potential in the vicinity of the project site. However, changes or ri+"r.f Nlantington Beach August, 2010 Item S. - Page 74 Pa,-326-;82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including adherence to standard UBC conditions and incorporation of mitigation measures GEO-5 through GEO-9, inclusive. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.2 of the SEIR, adequate measures shall also be taken to protect against liquefaction, including compliance with all UBC standards and mitigation measures set forth in the SEIR. Soil layers susceptible to liquefaction were not determined to be continuous throughout the proposed desalination facility site. Liquefied soils may experience post- liquefaction settlements of 4 to 5 inches. Proposed on site, aboveground structures have the potential to experience post-liquefaction distress. In addition, the presence of liquefaction-prone soils and the location of the subject site relative to the Huntington Beach Channel pose a risk of seismically induced lateral spread.—Substantial distress to both aboveground and underground structures would occur in the form of seismically induced landsliding. Therefore, along with compliance of UBC standards, a construction=level geotechnical study would be prepared for the proposed project site during the design phase of the project that would recommend design measures to mitigate liquefaction and lateral spread impacts such as: (1) over-excavation and recompaction of liquefaction/lateral spread-prone soils, (2) in situ soil densification, (3) injection grouting, or (4) deep soil mixing. The desalination facility project would be subject to the UBC and applicable CDMG publications in regard to liquefaction. With the incorporation of such measures, impacts related to liquefaction and lateral spreading will be less than significant. C. IMPACTS RELATED TO HYDROLOGY, DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER RUNOFF (SEIR pages 4.3-1 to 4.3-14) Section 4.3 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to hydrology, drainage and stormwater runoff. Topics related to stormwater drainage capacity, degradation or violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, and topics related to flood, seiche, tsunami, or mudflow hazards are addressed in this Section. The remaining topics are addressed in Section 3.0-C of this Statement of Findings of Facts Finding for Stormwater Drainage Capacity The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach would increase the amount of impervious area, thereby increasing surface runoff which may impact the stormwater drainage capacity for the site. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures HWQ-1 and HWQ-2, inclusive. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.3 of the SEIR, grading activities and development of the proposed project site are anticipated to increase the amount of impervious area, thereby increasing surface runoff. In addition, existing interior containment berms (which contain stormwater on site) would be removed, and the exterior berms that border the site would remain in place. An on site local stormwater drainage system, designed pursuant to city requirements, would be implemented as part of the desalination facility site and product water storage tank. Stormwater flows would first be directed to catch basins by gravity and would then be directed to a City of Huntington Beach Aucal ic+ ')n1 n Pa -327;82 ` Item 5. - Page 75 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report stormwater pump via gravity lines. Stormwater would be tested for pollutants, and if necessary, treated using one of two sedimentation methods. Stormwater would be directed to the desalination facility's stormwater system. In addition, containment berms- surrounding the western and northern side of the west tank site would be left in place, further containing stormwater on site. As alternative options, the desalination facility's on site stormwater system could discharge stormwater to the HBGS on site stormwater system-or the City of Huntington Beach's local stormwater system, both of which ultimately convey stormwater to the Pacific Ocean via the HBGS outfall. No stormwater would be discharged into the adjacent Huntington Beach Channel. A WQMP would be completed for the proposed project as required by the RWQCB. Therefore, the project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. It would not contribute significant increases in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Although no significant impacts have been identified, mitigation has been added to document standard requirements of the City of Huntington Beach that ensure adequate sizing and design of the stormwater drainage system, including water quality features. Finding for Water Quality Degradation or Violations of Water Quality Standards/Waste Discharge Requirements The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach is not anticipated to significantly degrade water quality or violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Regardless, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that further avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures HWQ-1 and HWQ-Z inclusive. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As discussed in Section 4.3 of the SEIR, the proposed desalination project would incorporate both native and nonnative landscaping on site. Nonnative vegetation may require periodic fertilization and pest control. The use of fertilizers and pesticides would comply with City standards and Integrated Pest Management Policy and Guidelines Implementation, as well as the guidelines set forth in the Orange County Management Guidelines for such activities. Based on the size of the landscaped areas, the small amounts of fertilizers and pesticides needed, and the fact that the site landscape would be maintained per local and County of Orange standards, it is unlikely that use of these chemicals would be of environmental concern to the groundwater, adjacent ocean waters, or surrounding uses. The long-term use of fertilizers and pesticides is not anticipated to degrade water quality or result in a violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. However, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) would be prepared for the proposed project, which would identify applicable BMPs and control measures as identified within the countywide NPDES DAMP. Stormwater shall be treated prior to off site discharge to minimize impacts from urban pollutants. The proposed project, as detailed within the SEIR will use either a waste filter backwash clarifier or a sedimentation in separate clarifiers. The most viable stormwater treatment alternative would be selected during the design phase of the project, in close coordination with the City of Huntington Beach, RWQCB, and HBGS staff. The stormwater facilities would be designed to comply with all applicable requirements of the City of Huntington Beach and the RWQCB. In addition, stormwater runoff would not affect adjacent sensitive land uses since the subject site would retain its exterior berms and would be graded so that all on site stormwater would flow r'if"of N1antington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 76 Pa.-328 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report toward an on site local stormwater drainage system. The on site local stormwater drainage system that would be implemented as part of the proposed project would not have surface runoff discharge onto Pacific Coast Highway. The existing containment berms along the eastern, western, and southern boundaries of the subject site would remain, providing additional containment of any stormwater to the project site. Applicable BMPs to contain stormwater runoff would be implemented and the project would be in compliance with all standards as administered by the RWRCB-and County of Orange. The existing containment berm along the eastern border of the project site (to be left in place) would prevent direct spillage of product or by-product water onto the portion of wetlands situated to the east. The Huntington Beach Channel separates the proposed facility site from Newland Marsh, located northwest of the site. In the event of an accidental spill associated with proposed project operation of either product or by-product water, no significant effects would occur on the adjacent wetland/open space areas because water would not pass the physical separations. Soils of wetlands--are already flooded by freshwater during the rainy season, forming standing pools. Product water spills would do the same. Soils are already hypersaline, so spills of by-product water would contribute little to the salinity of soils. Spills into the local Huntington Beach Channel are also likely to have minimal impact. The channel already has multiple year-round freshwater--inputs, so product water spills would have a less than significant impact. By-product water spills would be diluted by these freshwater inputs. However, if the channel is mostly oceanic at=the time of a spill, salinities may be overly elevated. Species likely to be found in the channel, such as topsmelt, can tolerate wide variations in salinity. In addition, the applicant has prepared a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP) for the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility to eliminate or minimize the potential for an accidental discharge of chemicals used at the desalination facility. Although no significant impacts related to water quality are anticipated, the project would be subject to compliance with water quality measures imposed by the City of Huntington Beach, and a WQMP would be required to document compliance measures. Impacts would therefore be less than significant with mitigation. Finding for Impacts Related to Flood, Seiche, Tsunami, or Mudflow Hazards The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach is not anticipated to be significantly impacted by flooding, a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow hazards. Regardless, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that further avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures HWQ-3. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.3 of the SEIR, the proposed project site currently has a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)flood-zone designation of"X," with protection from the 1% annual chance (100-year) or greater flood hazard by a levee system. The project would not place facilities within a 100-year flood hazard area that would expose people or structures to substantial risk, nor would it place structures that would substantially impede or redirect flood flows. The project site and surrounding area is generally level and not prone to mudflow. The site is located within the moderate run-up tsunami area. Heights of the 100- and 500-year tsunamis along the coastal area of Huntington Beach are 5 feet and 7.5 feet, respectively. The proposed desalination facility site is at approximately 5 feet above mean sea level. Previous evaluations put the risk of tsunami for the City of Huntington Beach at very low. Although no City of Huntington Beach Aucrl ic+ ')n1 n Pa.-329�82 Item5. - Pale 77 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report significant impacts have been identified, a mitigation measure has been added that ensures planning measures have been prepared to minimize or reduce risks to property and human safety from tsunami during operation. There is a potential for seiches to impact the subject site because it is situated adjacent to the Huntington Beach Channel. The magnitude of seiche waves impacting the project site are anticipated to be lower than those of a tsunami, given the frictional energy dissipation of water running along the bottom and walls of the Huntington Beach Channel. In addition, given that the existing 10- to 15-foot-high containment berm along the eastern boundary of the project site would remain (running along the Huntington Beach Channel), the likelihood of seiches impacting the site is considered low (Poseidon Resources Corporation 2007a). Impacts would be less than significant. D. IMPACTS RELATED TO AIR QUALITY (SEIR pages 4.4-1 to 4.4-23) Section 4.4 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to air quality. Those potential impacts are-addressed in Section 3.0-D of this Statement of Findings of Facts. E. IMPACTS RELATED TO NOISE (SEIR pages 4.5-1 to 4.5-18) Section 4.5 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to noise. -Stationary noise sources are addressed in this Section; the remaining topics are addressed in Section 3.0- E of this Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for Stationary Noise Sources The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may create significant impacts to sensitive receptors adjacent to the desalination facility site from long-term stationary noise sources associated with project operation. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including project design features and incorporation of mitigation measure N0I-1. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As illustrated in Section 4.5 of the SEIR, under the co-located operating condition scenario the product water pumps would be located 350 feet away from the nearest sensitive receptors. However, these pumps would be located within an underground vault, which would provide attenuation. The seawater intake pumps would be the next closest to sensitive receptors, which are 700 feet west of the influent pump station. This pump station would not be located within an enclosure that would attenuate noise. The analysis also presents the combined noise levels from all pumps at the closest sensitive receptors in each direction from the project site. Sensitive receptors located to the west would experience noise levels of 59.9 dBA. When accounting for existing intervening structures (industrial buildings to the north), berms, and tanks (to the west), the anticipated noise levels would be further reduced. The City's applicable exterior noise standards are 55 dBA between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., and 50 dBA between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Therefore, pump noise levels would be potentially significant. Under the stand-alone operating condition, the primary operational components that would emit noise are the intake pump station, the RO system, the membrane cleaning system, and the product water pump station. The stand-alone operating condition involves use of two existing HBGS once-through cooling pumps, and the replacement of one existing HBGS pump (for a total of three additional duty pumps in comparison to the co-located operating condition). As depicted in the SEIR, sensitive receptors located to the west would experience noise levels of ri+"r,f Nlantington Beach August, 2010 Item Sa - Page 78 pa.-330 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 61.3 dBA. When accounting for existing intervening structures (industrial buildings to the north), berms, and tanks (to the west), the anticipated noise levels would be further reduced. Background noise levels in the project area would be below the combined noise levels in as provided-in Section 4.5 of the SEIR. Therefore, pump noise levels would also be potentially significant under the stand-alone operating condition. Therefore, under either scenario, the implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would reduce the impact to less than significant by requiring the outdoor pump stations to be located within an enclosure designed to reduce noise levels by at least 20 dBA. F. IMPACTS RELATED TO PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES (SEIR pages 4.6-1 to 4.6-18) Section 4.6 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to public services and utilities. Solid Waste is discussed in this Section. The remaining potential impacts--are addressed in Section 3.0-F of this Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for Solid Waste The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will not have a significant impact related to solid waste. Regardless, in order to further reduce this potential impact to a less=than significant impact, mitigation measures PSU-1 and PSU-2 have been incorporated into the analysis under Section 4.6 of the SEIR. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As discussed under Section 4.6 of the SEIR, the primary sources of solid waste from the project would consist of sludge generated as a result of the intake water pretreatment filtration and disposal of other wastes, such as filter cartridges and spent RO membranes. In addition, the office facilities on the site are expected to generate nominal amounts of office waste. All of these waste products qualify as refuse under the City of Huntington Beach's municipal code. Combined the sludge, spent filter cartridges, and spent RO membranes would equal approximately 2,425 tons of solid waste generated by the desalination process per year, roughly 0.06% of the solid waste sent to Orange County landfills in 2007. Orange County landfills-have a combined remaining capacity of over 185,000,000 cubic yards, and therefore have sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs. Rainbow Disposal, the City's franchise municipal solid waste hauler, would service the project. The project applicant will comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste handling, transport, and disposal. Therefore, no impact would occur relating to solid waste. Regardless, mitigation measures related to waste reduction and recycling were incorporated into the SEIR to further reduce these already less than significant impacts. G. IMPACTS RELATED TO AESTHETICS/ VISUAL CHARACTER AND LIGHT AND GLARE (SEIR pages 4.7-1 to 4.7-18) Section 4.7 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to aesthetics/visual character and light and glare. Those potential impacts are addressed in this Section. Finding for Aesthetics/Visual Character The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach is not anticipated to create significant impacts to aesthetics or visual character. Regardless, mitigation measure ALG-1 has been City of Huntington Beach Aucrl le+ 9n1 n Pa.-331-;82 Item 5® - Page 79 Seawater DesalinatiorrProject-at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report incorporated into the SEIR to further reduce this already less than significant impact. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.7 of the SEIR, the project site is currently industrial in nature, containing large scale industrial tank facilities. The views of the site and views of scenic resources through the site would not be degraded or impaired because the proposed facilities are less visually obtrusive than the existing fuel oil storage tanks. No scenic resources, trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings are located on the site. Although Pacific Coast Highway is identified as being eligible for state scenic highway status, it is not so designated. In the event Pacific Coast Highway were to be designated in the future as a scenic highway, impacts would be less than significant as there are no mature trees, rock outcroppings, community identification symbols, or landmarks that would Ise impacted due to project implementation. The project site is currently industrial in nature and proposed facilities would generally be less visually obtrusive than the existing fuel storage tanks. Project components would not exceed 35 feet in height and would replace existing structures that are up to 40 feet in height. Project components would be set back from Newland Street and Edison Avenue and separated from the street by landscaping and streetscape improvements. The project will result in a decrease in shading as the proposed structures would not exceed_ 30 feet in height in comparison to the existing structures, which are 40 feet in height. The project would generally improve visual conditions on the project site and would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. However, design features have been identified- that will provide assurances that the visual character of the site is maintained and enhanced per the design requirements of the City of Huntington Beach. Although impacts are less than significant, design standards would be implemented through the City's design review process, and a mitigation measure (ALG-1) has been added to the SEIR to address visual required screening. Finding for Light and Glare The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach is not anticipated to create significant impacts related to light and glare. Regardless, mitigation measure ALG-2 has been incorporated into the SEIR to further reduce this already less than significant impact. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As addressed in Section 4.7 of the SEIR, the project components are located in an urbanized area that includes existing light sources. The project would result in the removal of existing light sources (light fixtures mounted on poles and on the existing fuel storage tanks) and introduce new light sources for the operational use of the desalination facility, 66 kV substation and product water storage tank. Any new lighting would be subject to City design standards and would utilize directional lighting techniques and low-wattage bulbs (without compromising site safety or security) in order to direct light downwards and minimize light spillover into adjacent land uses, such as the mobile home park located to the west, and wetland areas to the southeast. Given the existing industrial nature of the area, the amount of lighting would not substantially increase compared to the existing condition for nearby sensitive receptors. Project implementation and vehicles utilizing the facility may also result in a minimal amount of additional reflective surfaces on proposed structures. However, the resulting glare effects would rif%,of Nlantington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 80 Pa -332 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report be relatively minor when compared to existing levels of glare in the site vicinity. And while water transmission pipeline facilities would also be constructed adjacent to residential uses within the right-of-way, they would be located underground. As discussed above, the project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Although this impact is less than significant, design standards would be implemented through the City's design review process, and a mitigation measure (ALG-2) has been added to require a lighting plan that will be approved by the City. H. IMPACTS RELATED TO HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (SEIR pages 4.8-1 to 4.8-18) Section 4.8 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials. Those potential impacts are addressed in Section 3.0-H of this Statement of Findings of Facts. 1. IMPACTS RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION (SEIR pages 4.9-1 to 4.9-64) Section 4.9 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential construction related impacts All of the potential construction related impacts are addressed in this Section, except for air quality. Potential short-term construction related impacts regarding air quality are addressed in Section 5.0-A of this Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for Hydrology and Water Quality The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may have adverse short-term construction related impacts in regards to hydrology and water quality. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including standard conditions, project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures CON-1 through CON-9, inclusive. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.9 of the SEIR, potential short-term construction related impacts in regards to hydrology and water quality have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by appropriate project design features and through incorporation of mitigation measures CON-1 through CON-9. Excavation, grading, and backfilling associated with project implementation are anticipated to generate erosive conditions that may include sediment laden storm run-off or dust. As part of the NPDES process, the project would comply with the State of California general permit and would include the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and associated source control and/or treatment control BMPs that would avoid or mitigate runoff pollutants at the construction site to the "maximum extent practicable." The Municipal NPDES Permit differs from the Construction General NPDES Permit in that it regulates stormwater runoff from sites and activities following construction, as opposed to during construction activities. This Municipal NPDES Permit requires that discharges from the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) shall not cause or contribute to exceedances of receiving water quality standards (designated beneficial uses and water quality objectives)for City of Huntington Beach Aura le+ �nl n Pa -333-;82 `Item 5. - Page 81 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS- Subsequent Environmental Impact Report surface waters or groundwaters. The DAMP and its components shall be designed to achieve compliance with receiving water limitations. It is expected that compliance with receiving water limitations will be achieved through an iterative process and the application of increasingly more effective BMPs. Dewatering activities due to excavation at the proposed desalination facility site are not anticipated to have significant impacts in regards to hydrogeology and water quality. Dewatering discharge would be directed to a desilting system, and would be sampled and tested periodically to ensure compliance with all regulations. Should contaminated groundwater be encountered, a remediation contractor would remediate the groundwater prior to discharge into the sanitary sewer system, subject to a permit from Orange County Sanitation District, or HBGS stormwater system. The -dewatering operations will have no impacts on nearby wetlands, flood channel and landfill site because of the limited radius of influence of the various dewatering systems planned to be used for the proposed project. While potential impacts to nearby wetlands and structures are highly unlikely, a monitoring well system will be installed and operated for the duration of the desalination facility construction period in order to ascertain that construction activities do not have any measurable impacts on groundwater quality or levels outside of the boundaries of the desalination facility site. Groundwater conditions would return to existing levels subsequent to the dewatering process, and the project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge or seawater intrusion barriers. Compliance with NPDES permit requirements and implementation of BMPs and the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction "Greenbook," which include such measures as use of sand bags and-temporary dam building, may be applied to sufficiently reduce sediment laden storm run-off. Additionally, area watering and limiting excavation, backfilling and grading activities to non-windy days would sufficiently control the amount of particulate matter that may migrate off-site. Existing regulations require preparation and implementation of a SWPPP and a City Precise Grading permit would be required. Any potential construction dewatering would be subject to the De Minimus Threat General Permit conditions. The City of Huntington Beach LIP also requires-that all construction projects, regardless of size or priority, implement stormwater BMPs that shall include, at a minimum, erosion and sediment controls. The potential for erosion is considered a significant impact, and mitigation measures are identified to reduce erosion impacts to less than significant levels. Finding for Noise The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may have adverse short-term construction related impacts in regards to noise. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including standard conditions, project design features and incorporation of mitigation measure CON-15. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.9 of the SEIR, potential short-term construction related impacts in regards to noise have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by appropriate project design features and through incorporation of mitigation measures CON-15. In order to estimate the "worst case" construction noise levels that may occur at an existing noise-sensitive receptor, the SEIR combined construction equipment noise levels have been calculated for the demolition, grading, trenching, paving, and building phases. rrif„of Huntington Beach August, 2010 Item v. a Page 82 Pa.-334-;s2 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report As indicated in detail within Section 4.9, the anticipated short-term construction noise levels generated during demolition, grading, trenching, paving, and building activities would not expose adjacent receptors to significant interior noise levels. Thus, construction noise associated with the proposed project would not expose surrounding sensitive receptors to substantial noise levels during construction. Noise sensitive receptors in proximity to the desalination facility site (i.e., residential, school, and park uses) would not experience excessive noise levels during construction activities. Noise associated with construction of the water supply pipelines would be short-term, and the -forward progression of construction activities would mean that the noise impact may last for only two to three days at any one location. Construction of the booster pump stations is not expected to result in substantial noise levels, as the equipment used to construct these project components would not generate significant noise levels. The City provides exemptions for construction activities from the provisions of the Noise Ordinance in Section 8.40.090, Special Provisions, provided that they take place between the hours of 7:00-AM and 8:00 PM weekdays and Saturdays. Implementation of mitigation measure CON-14 would further minimize any impacts from construction noise and would ensure that impacts would-be less than significant. Construction activities would also cause increased noise along access routes to and from the site due to movement of equipment and workers. Construction worker commute trips would be a maximum of approximately 225 trips per day. All construction traffic would utilize Newland Street to access the project site. With a maximum number of construction trips anticipated to be approximately 225 trips per day, construction related traffic would under a worse-case scenario increase traffic volumes by less than 5% from existing traffic volumes. Given a less than 5% increase in traffic along heavily traveled roadways from construction traffic, the anticipated construction trips would result in a less than one dB Ldn increase. Therefore, surrounding uses would not notice a substantial increase in traffic noise from construction trips due to the existing high volume of traffic and trucks traveling along roadways. Also, construction activities would take place during allowable daytime hours (7:00 AM to 8:00 PM), would be short-term, and would cease upon project completion. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. As the nearest sensitive residential receptor to construction activities associated with the on-site desalination facility would be located 285 feet to the west, ground vibrations from project construction activities would not exceed the FRA groundborne vibration threshold of 72 VdB for residential land uses. Additionally, structures directly surrounding the project site (at a distance of 80 feet) consist of industrial buildings. These industrial buildings are expected to be structurally sufficient to withstand potential vibration from construction activities. Consequently, impacts would be less than significant. The project would include construction of a new water supply pipeline extending from the project site northerly into the City of Huntington Beach, City of Fountain Valley, City of Garden Grove, City of Westminster and City of Santa Ana and unincorporated areas of Orange County, and easterly into the City of Costa Mesa. A number of alignment options have been identified to provide flexibility in alignment selection and to ensure that all potential alignment segments are analyzed in the SEIR. Although the SEIR includes project level environmental analysis of several potential alignment options, only one of the potential alignment options will be constructed as part of the project. Based on typical construction equipment used for pipeline construction, the primary noise sources would include excavators, backhoes, loaders, dump trucks, cranes, welders, crew and delivery trucks, water trucks, and roller compactors. Based on the forward progression of construction activities the noise impact may last for only two to three days at any one location. The construction activities would comply with the local jurisdictions' noise ordinance for allowable hours. Because the project will be required to comply with construction noise restrictions and would be short in duration, it is not anticipated that City of Huntington Beach Auol ic+ ?nl n Pa.-335 1'82 `Item 5. - rage 83 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report excavation and installation of the pipelines using open trench installation methods would result in a significant noise impact, based on the applicable significance criteria. The closest residences have existing sound walls that attenuate noise from the roadway, and would serve to also attenuate construction noise. It is not anticipated that the construction noise would exceed the existing ambient traffic noise in these locations. In addition, the construction noise would be restricted based on the requirements of the local jurisdiction relative to construction noise and would therefore not exceed established standards. Therefore, the noise impact is not anticipated to be significant. Finding for Underground Utilities The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may have adverse short-term construction related impacts in regards to underground utilities. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including standard conditions and incorporation of mitigation measure CON-16. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.9 of the SEIR, potential short-term construction related impacts in regards to public services and utilities have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by standard conditions and through incorporation of mitigation measure CON-16. The demolition, remediation, and construction process for implementation of both on- and off-site components of the proposed project is not anticipated to result in impacts to public services. However, the proposed project (especially the installation of product water pipeline) may impact utilities in regards to damage or disruption of underground facilities such as water/sewer pipelines, electrical conduits, underground cable television or telephone wiring, and natural gas mains. Therefore, in order to mitigate impacts to public services and utilities, the project engineer shall perform geophysical surveys to identify subsurface utilities and structures, the findings of which shall be incorporated into site design. Pipelines or conduits which may be encountered within the excavation and graded areas shall either be relocated or be cut and plugged according to-the applicable code requirements. Finding for Aesthetics/Light and Glare The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may have adverse short-term construction related impacts in regards to aesthetics/light and glare. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including standard conditions, project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures CON-17 and CON- 18. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.9 of the SEIR, potential short-term construction related impacts in regards to aesthetics/ light and glare have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by appropriate project design features and through incorporation of mitigation measures CON-17 and CON-18. Demolition, remediation, and construction debris, associated mechanical equipment and high levels of truck traffic may adversely impact views of and across the project site, including the pipeline alignment and underground pump station locations. However, these impacts would not be considered significant, as they would be limited ri+„of Huntington Beach August, 2010 Item 5e - Page 84 Pa -336;82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach _ FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report in scope and duration. Standard construction measures such as chain link fencing and nylon mesh would be utilized to screen the staging and construction areas from surrounding areas and the general public at the proposed desalination project site and underground pump station sites. In addition, a staging area for equipment associated with the demolition, remediation, and construction process would be situated within HBGS property boundaries. Substantial sources of light and glare would not be produced by construction activities, because most construction would occur during the clay and any night-lighting would be limited, and focused-directly on the construction area, minimizing light spill into surrounding areas. Therefore, construction activities are not anticipated to result in significant impacts related to aesthetics or lighting. Finding for Hazards and Hazardous--Materials The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may have adverse short-term construction related impacts in regards to hazards and hazardous materials. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid-or-substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including standard conditions, project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures CON-19 through CON-33, inclusive. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.9 of the SEIR, potential short-term construction related impacts in regards to hazards and hazardous materials have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by standard conditions, appropriate project design features and through incorporation of mitigation measures CON-19 through CON-33, inclusive. Construction workers could be at risk for remediation activities tied to cleaning the site as needed. However, site remediation activities are strictly controlled by local, state, and federal requirements and the majority of contamination in the vicinity of the proposed desalination project site is petroleum- based (which is not considered "toxic" or acutely hazardous). Should development over a plugged/abandoned well be necessary, the well would be plugged or re-plugged in accordance with current Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) specifications. Implementation of the water transmission pipeline portion of the project may create potential impacts due to landfill gas generation (particularly methane) from the former -cannery Street Landfill. Both pipeline alignment alternatives would pass directly south of the former landfill within Hamilton Avenue. However, pipeline construction in the vicinity of the former Cannery Street landfill would comply with all local, state, and federal regulations in regards to landfill gas. Standard construction practices would be implemented to determine the potential for landfill gas and, if deemed necessary, appropriate gas detection, venting, and/or barrier system would be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. In addition, potential groundwater contamination beneath the subject site may pose a short-term health threat to on-site workers and adjacent land uses during dewatering operations. Groundwater pumped from the project site would be continually monitored for pollutants, and if detected, would be treated prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system or stormwater facilities. As dewatering operations would meet all federal, State and local criteria for groundwater contaminants, impacts would be less than significant. Demolition of existing on-site fuel oil storage tanks may expose persons to ACMs and/or lead- based paint. Existing tanks on site are constructed with a layer of insulation that contains asbestos. The proposed project is not expected to present significant health hazards, as carefully controlled removal operations would comply with the Remedial Action Plan and all applicable federal, state, county, and local regulations and measures. A licensed asbestos/lead City of Huntington Beach Aurlle+ 9n1n Pa�-337-`82 `Item 5. - Page 85 Seawater Desalination-Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report abatement contractor would be retained to remove the hazardous materials prior to the demolition of any structures. All ACMs would be removed in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403. Finding for Traffic The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may have adverse short-term construction related impacts in regards to traffic. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant_environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including standard conditions, project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures CON-34 through CON-39, inclusive. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.9 of the SEIR, potential short-term construction related impacts in regards to traffic have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by standard conditions, appropriate project design features and through-incorporation of mitigation measures CON-34 through CON-39, inclusive. Construction within roadways will require temporary lane closures for trenching,_ construction staging and equipment maneuvering. The demolition, remediation and construction process would generate traffic in the site vicinity through on-site construction worker vehicle trips and truck trips. These activities have the potential to result in significant short-term impacts related to traffic congestion and traffic safety. However, a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) would be prepared for the demolition, remediation and construction phases of the proposed project in order to mitigate these short- term impacts to less than significant levels. The TMP would be prepared for the pipeline implementation phase of the proposed project in order to minimize traffic impacts and minimize the potential to interfere with emergency response due to pipeline implementation, such as the use of plating to reopen travel lanes during peak traffic hours as well as maintaining access to businesses and residences. Pipeline construction for product water delivery would require temporary disruption along public streets, as the majority of the pipeline is proposed to be installed within existing street right-of- way (ROW) utilizing open trench construction methods. Trenchless construction methods would be utilized to cross roadways sensitive to traffic disruption, such as Brookhurst Street and SR- 55. Adequate staging areas would be provided for both open trench and trenchless construction in order to minimize the amount of traffic disruption. Furthermore, traffic impacts are not anticipated to occur upon implementation of the underground booster pump stations, as the pump station sites are proposed to occur outside of public streets, and would not require the closure of, or impede access to any roadways. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Finding for Biological Resources The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may have adverse short-term construction related impacts in regards to biological resources. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including standard conditions, project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures CON-40 through CON-48, inclusive. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding rrif"of wuntington Beach August, 2010 Item S. - Page 86 Pa,-338 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report As explained in Section 4.9 of the SEIR, construction of the proposed desalination facility would not directly impact any sensitive species or habitat, including the existing wetland area situated to the southeast of the proposed site, as the facility is proposed entirely within the existing fuel oil storage tank area. In addition, the site does not contain any wetlands under federal or state jurisdiction, and is not within an approved Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan reserve area, and does not contain sensitive biological resources protected under the City's Local Coastal Program. The site is also not part of a wildlife movement or linkage area, and does not serve as a wildlife nursery site. However, construction-related impacts have the potential to occur indirectly on nearby sensitive habitat areas in regards to air quality, noise, light/glare, and stormwater runoff. Construction impacts would be short-term in nature and would cease following completion of the--project. Construction at the desalination facility would only occur during the hours allowed by the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance (7:00 AM to 8:00 PM). Upon adherence to construction standards administered by the City of Huntington Beach, and upon-implementation of recommended mitigation measures, impacts to special-status species or sensitive habitats in the nearby wetland area are not anticipated to be significant. Similar to the proposed desalination facility, construction of the offsite water conveyance pipelines would not directly impact any sensitive species or habitats, because they are proposed entirely within existing roadways and disturbed areas. In addition, the pipeline alignments are not within any wetlands under federal or state jurisdiction, and are not within an approved Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan reserve area, and do not contain sensitive biological resources protected under the City's Local Coastal Program, or any other local resource protection policies. The pipeline alignments do not function as wildlife movement or linkage areas, and do not serve as wildlife nursery sites. However, construction of the pipelines using trenchless construction techniques that cross under potentially jurisdictional water features may result in impacts due to "frac-outs" potentially occurring during pipeline construction. "Frac-outs" occur when drilling fluids (usually bentonite) seep to the surface via cracks in the ground. A Frac-out Contingency Plan has been prepared to establish operational procedures and responsibilities for the prevention, containment and clean-up of frac-outs associated with trenchless construction activities. Construction of the proposed OC-44 underground booster pump station has the potential to impact biological resources, as the 0.5-acre site contains native vegetation known to support numerous species of wildlife. However, siting and design options for the pump station are available to avoid direct impacts on sensitive biological resources and jurisdictional wetlands/waters. Because a final design and configuration has not yet been developed, mitigation measures are included to ensure that avoidance of direct impacts is accomplished with final design. According to the 1995 County of Orange Central & Coastal Subregion Natural Community Conservation Plan & Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP), the OC-44 pump station would be located within the NCCP/HCP area; however, it would not be situated within or near a designated "special linkage" area. The nearest "special linkage" area to the proposed underground booster pump station site is the Coyote Landfill Special Linkage area, situated approximately 2,000 feet to the east. The El Capitan Special Linkage Area is located approximately one mile to the south. Implementation of the proposed off-site underground pump station is not anticipated to impact either of these "special linkage" areas. In addition, the underground pump station site would be situated adjacent to an urbanized area. Therefore, construction at the OC-44 pump station site would not interfere substantially with wildlife movement, and impacts would be less than significant. City of Huntington Beach Aucl—f )nl n Pa -339 82 Item 5. - Page 8'7 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS-OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report The OC-35 pump station and the Coastal Junction pump station would not directly impact any sensitive species or habitats. The sites do not contain any wetlands under federal or state jurisdiction, and is not within an approved Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan reserve area, and does not contain sensitive biological resources protected under local resource protection policies. The site does not function as wildlife movement or linkage areas, and does not serve as wildlife nursery sites. No impacts to biological resources are anticipated. Finding for Cultural Resources The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may-have adverse short-term construction--related impacts in regards to cultural resources. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including standard conditions, project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures CON-49 through CON-52. Less than significant-impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As discussed under Section 4.9 regarding cultural resources, numerous archaeological studies have been conducted within a mile radius of the proposed site. No cultural or paleontological resources have been identified on the project-site. No monitoring of excavations for the project is recommended; however, if such resources are discovered during construction, a qualified Archaeologist or Paleontologist must be retained to evaluate the discovery prior to resuming grading in the immediate vicinity of the find. Additionally, since nearby fossil localities produced small vertebrate remains that cannot be readily seen during normal monitoring activities, it is recommended that adequate sediment samples be collected and processed to determine the potential for small fossils being present in these sediments. A mitigation program must include the provision of the preparation and identification of any recovered fossils in order to ensure specimens are sent to an accredited museum for permanent storage and future retrieval by qualified paleontologists. No historical or archaeological resources are known to exist within or surrounding the proposed booster pump station sites, impacts are not anticipated to be significant. However, should buried historical/archaeological resources be discovered during construction, all work in that area would be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the finds. However, as the OC-44 pump station site and the two optional pump station locations are underlain by sediments deposited during the middle Miocene period, there is a high potential for the existence of middle Miocene invertebrate fossils and lower potential for middle Miocene vertebrate and Pleistocene vertebrate/invertebrate fossils. Project excavations that would remove more than five feet of material must be monitored by a qualified Paleontologist. The paleontological monitor must be empowered to halt or divert construction equipment from the immediate vicinity of the find in order to allow for evaluation and removal (if warranted) of the discovery. Additionally, due to nearby fossil localities produced small vertebrate remains that cannot be readily seen during normal monitoring activities, it is recommended that adequate sediment samples be collected and processed to determine the potential for small fossil being present in these sediments. A mitigation program must include the provision of the preparation and identification of any recovered fossils in order to ensure specimens are sent to an accredited museum for permanent storage and future retrieval by qualified paleontologists. With the implementation of recommended mitigation measures, impacts to paleontological resources are not expected to be significant. r'i+l/^f"lintington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 88 Pa -340 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report J. IMPACTS RELATED TO OCEAN WATER QUALITY AND MARINE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (SEIR pages 4.10-1 to 4.10-68) Section 4.10 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to ocean water quality and marine biological resources. Those potential impacts are addressed in Section 3.0-J of this Statement of Findings of Facts. K. IMPACTS-RELATED TO PRODUCT WATER QUALITY (SEIR pages 4.11-1 to 4.11- 28) Section 4.11 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to product water quality. Those potential impacts are addressed in this Section. Finding for Product Water Quality The proposed desalination project product water quality may be impacted by several factors, including ocean -water quality fluctuations, red tide algal bloom events, HBGS non-routine operations and RO membrane performance. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures PW-1 through PW-3, inclusive. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding The product water of the proposed seawater desalination facility may be impacted by natural changes in ocean water salinity, temperature, turbidity and pathogen concentration. Typically, ocean water salinity and temperature changes are triggered by natural seasonal events. As discussed in Section 4.10, the intake ocean water turbidity and pathogen concentration changes are mainly driven by rain events. In order to maintain a consistent quality of desalinated product water, the applicant would be required to obtain a drinking water permit from the California Department of Public Health (DPH) that would address monitoring of source water quality and its effects on product water quality. The applicant has been working with DPH for the last four years to obtain such a permit. In August 2002, DPH issued a conceptual approval letter for the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach. The desalination facility intake water quality in terms of turbidity (which is a surrogate indicator for potential elevated pathogen content) and salinity would be measured automatically and monitored continuously at the desalination facility intake. Instrumentation for continuous monitoring and recording of these parameters would be installed at the desalination facility intake pump station. In event of excessive increase in intake seawater turbidity and/or salinity, this instrumentation would trigger alarms that would notify desalination facility staff. If the intake pathogen count reaches a preset maximum level, this instrumentation would automatically trigger chlorination of the source water, thereby reducing the source water pathogens to acceptable levels even before the water reaches the RO treatment facilities. In addition to the automation provisions, turbidity and salinity would also be measured manually by the desalination staff at least once a day and the intake seawater would be analyzed for pathogen content at least once per week. In the event of elevated intake seawater turbidity, laboratory pathogen content analysis would be performed more frequently. City of Huntington Beach Aup le+ ')nl n Pa.-341,82 ` Rem 5e - Page 89 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report In addition to the intake water quality monitoring instrumentation, the desalination facility pretreatment filtration facilities would be equipped with filter effluent turbid meters and particle counters. This equipment would allow facility operators to continuously monitor pretreatment filter performance and to trigger adjustments of desalination facility operations to accommodate intake water quality changes. Desalinated product water quality would also be monitored continuously for salinity and chlorine residuals and would be tested frequently for pathogen content. In summary, desalinated product water quality would be tested in accordance with the requirements of the California Code of Regulations (Title 22) and the DPH. Product water quality impacts due to ocean water quality fluctuations are not anticipated to occur upon implementation of the design features described above. The desalination facility would be designed to maintain high quality potable water (consistent with regulatory standards) in the event of a red tide event. As explained in Section 4.11 of the SEIR, it would have a number of provisions/barriers to protect against the passage of red tide- related algal organic compounds through the treatment processes. These include a deep intake configuration to minimize algae entrainment, the chlorination of intake seawater, an enhanced coagulation of intake seawater, a microfiltration or dual media sand filtration algae barrier, microfiltration or dual media sand filter covers, a cartridge filter algae barrier, the RO membranes, a final disinfection, and an emergency facility shutdown procedure. Also, there are no documented cases of red tide health or safety problems associated with the operation of RO seawater desalination facilities worldwide which is indicative of the capability of these systems to perform reliably and effectively under red tide conditions. Unusual activities at the HBGS, such as seawater emergency intake pump shut downs and failures, electricity equipment malfunctions, excessively high temperature of the cooling water, etc., may impact product water quality and desalination facility performance. The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach would have six different provisions incorporating several protection/notification devices to account for non-routine operations at the HBGS: • Automatic Control Interlock between HBGS Pumps and Desalination Facility Intake Pumps: The shutdown controls of the desalination facility intake pumps would be interlocked with the HBGS pumps, so when HBGS pump operation is discontinued to prepare for heat treatment, non-routine or even routine pump shutdown, this would automatically trigger an alarm at the desalination facility along with shutdown of the desalination intake pumps. After this emergency shutdown, the intake pumps would have to be started up manually, and the operations staff would be required to check the reason of shutdown with the HBGS staff before restarting the treatment facility intake pumps. • Continuous Intake Pump Flow Measurement Devices: Seawater intake pumps would be equipped with flow meters, which would record the pumped flow continuously. If the intake flow is discontinued for any reason, including non-routine HBGS operations, this would trigger automatic intake pump shutdown. • Continuous Intake Water Temperature Measurement Devices: The desalination facility intake pump station would be equipped with instrumentation for continuous ri+"nt Nlantington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 90 Pa -342 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report measurement of the intake temperature. Any fluctuations of the intake temperature outside preset normal limits would trigger alarm and intake pump shutdown. This monitoring equipment would provide additional protection against heat treatment or other unusual intake water quality conditions. • Continuous Intake Water Salinity/Conductivity Measurement Devices: The desalination facility intake pump station would be equipped with instrumentation for continuous measurement of the intake seawater salinity. Any fluctuations of the intake salinity outside preset normal operational limits would trigger an alarm and initiate intake pump shutdown. This monitoring equipment would provide additional protection against discharge of unusual fresh water/surface water streams in the facility outfall. • Continuous Intake Water Oil Spill/Leak Detection Monitoring Devices: The desalination facility intake pump station would be equipped with instrumentation for oil spill/leak detection. Detection of oil in the intake water even in concentrations - lower than 0.5 mg/L would automatically trigger an alarm and initiate intake pump shutdown. This monitoring equipment would provide additional protection against unusual intake water quality conditions. • Routine-Communication with HBGS Staff: The desalination facility_staff of each shift would be required to contact HBGS personnel at least once per shift and inquire about unusual planned or unplanned events at the HBGS. If non-routine operations are planned at the HBGS, the desalination facility would be informed and would modify desalination facility operations accordingly. Implementation of the provisions described above would minimize impacts in this regard to less than significant levels. As the RO membrane elements age, their rejection capabilities decrease. This may trigger a change in product water quality from the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach. The RO system membrane performance would continuously monitor feed seawater and permeate conductivity and the differential pressure through the membranes. If-permeate salinity (i.e. total dissolved solids [TDS]) concentration exceeds the design level, membranes would be cleaned to recover their original performance capabilities. In addition, after the third year of operations, an average of 10 to 15 percent of the membrane elements would be replaced every year, thereby maintaining the product water quality at a steady level. The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach would produce product water with lower TDS levels than that currently delivered to Orange County water purveyors by MWD. The TDS product water quality estimate of 350 mg/L is based on the use of high-rejection seawater desalination membranes at the second year of desalination facility operations. Typically, during the first two years of facility operations, the average product water quality TDS concentration would be lower than 350 mg/L. After the second year of operations, a portion (typically 10 to 15 percent per year) of the desalination facility membrane elements would be replaced to maintain the product water quality close to the target TDS concentration of 350 mg/L. Membrane replacement is a standard approach commonly used in seawater desalination facilities to maintain product water quality at a long-term steady target level. In addition, chloride and sodium are estimated to average 180 mg/L and 120 mg/L, respectively. City of Huntington Beach Auglic+ ?nln Pa.-343;82 Item 50 - Page 91 Seawater Desalination-Project-at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report These estimated water quality levels for TDS, chloride, and sodium are well below the newly adopted narrative water quality objectives in the amended Basin Plan and when the desalinated water is integrated into the water supply system it is unlikely that recycled water would exceed the amended Basin Plan narrative water quality objectives. The desalination facility would use_ industry standard eight-inch desalination membrane elements, which are available from a number of specialized membrane manufacturers. The membrane element manufacturers and their products pre-qualified for this project are: - Hydranautics - Filmtec/Dow - Koch/Fluid Systems - Toray Key design membrane element parameters common-for the products of these suppliers are: - Membrane Type: Spiral=wound, thin film composite; - Applied Flux: eight to 12 gpd/sf at recovery rate of 45 to 50 percent; - Nominal Salt Rejection: 99.6 percent or higher; - Applied Pressure: 800 to 1,100 pounds--per square inch (psi); - Maximum Pressure Drop per Element:_10 psi; - Maximum Feed Water SDI (15 min): 5.0; - Free Chlorine Resistance: less than 0.1 mg/L; - Operating pH Range: two to 11; and - QA/QC Membrane Production and Testing Procedures. The actual membrane element that would be used for the proposed desalination facility would be selected during the detailed engineering design phase of this project. The product water projections are performed for two conditions: new membranes at facility start up and membranes at the second year of facility operations. All projections are completed for low flow scenario conditions in terms of intake water salinity and temperature and membrane performance characteristics. At the beginning of the desalination facility operation the TDS concentration of the RO system permeate-is projected to be between 226 and 308 mg/L, and at the end of the second year of desalination facility operations is projected to be between 257 and 349 mg/L (based on projections of product water quality and membrane performance in accordance with modeling specifications provided by two of the four membrane suppliers, Toray and Hydranautics). As previously indicated, the permeate water quality would be maintained at a second-year operations level over the entire 30-year period of facility operations by replacement of a portion of the membrane elements every year. It should be noted that the projections above are for the water quality of the RO system permeate as it exits the desalination system. Prior to distribution, the desalination facility permeate would be conditioned by calcite and carbon dioxide for stabilization and corrosion contror, and with chlorine for final disinfection. The addition of these conditioning chemicals would increase the final product water TDS concentration by 30 to 50 mg/L. Therefore, at facility start-up the TDS of the product water delivered to the distribution system is expected to be in a range of 260 to 340 mg/L, while for the entire 30-year period of facility operations the TDS concentration would be in a range of 300 to 400 mg/L and would average 350 mg/L. The projections presented above are developed using conservative assumptions for the type and performance of the membrane elements, intake water salinity and temperature. The ri+"M Huntington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. s Page 92 Pa -344 1 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report applicant's previous pilot testing experience in Tampa and Carlsbad and the actual performance of the same Toray membranes in Trinidad indicate that the membrane manufacturer projections carry a safety factor of 10 to 15 percent and the actual product water quality is always better than that projected by the software. Advances in membrane technology over the next 30 years are expected to yield membrane elements capable of producing water of TDS concentration below 300 mg/L for most of the useful life of the desalination facility. Therefore, the projected product water TDS concentration of 350 mg/L is a reliable and conservative estimate of the potable water quality that would be delivered to the distribution system by the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach. As described in Section 3.0 of the SEIR, the facility would be capable of meeting all drinking water standards through multiple treatment processes, which include: pretreatment filters; cartridge filters; reverse osmosis membranes; and product water conditioning and disinfection facilities. The desalination facility product water quality meets all current DHS water quality MCL standards. The project would also be consistent with all requirements of the SARWQCB Basin Plan. Thus, impacts in this regard would not be significant. As explained in Section 4.11 of the SEIR, boron is the only compound that is detectable in the product drinking water from the seawater desalination facility. After the RO treatment process, the desalted water boron level is approximately 0.6-1.0 mg/L, which is below the CDPH action level. Impacts to the product water quality are less than significant. Finding for Product Water Reliability The proposed desalination project product water reliability may be impacted by earthquakes or other unscheduled outages. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including project design features and incorporation of mitigation measure PIN-4. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As discussed in the SEIR, the desalination facility operations would be fully automated and key systems would be provided with redundant equipment and controls per the requirements of Title 22 of the CCR. The electrical substation and desalination facility will be built with redundant systems such that in the event of equipment repair or failure, power to the product water pump station will be maintained. The product water storage tank will supply approximately 5 hours of water supply at full facility production capacity flows, and longer durations at reduced flow. In the event of an underground booster pump station power outage, the booster pump station would be equipped with on-site power generators that would allow their operation to continue even if the main source of power supply has been interrupted. The desalination facility would be manned 24 hours per day, 365 days per year by skilled and certified operators, which would coordinate facility and pump station operations with that of all other water purveyors delivering water to or operating the water distribution system facilities. As a part of desalination and pumping station operations, the operations staff would develop an earthquake mitigation and preparedness plan, which would be coordinated with the City. This plan would define coordination measures to provide continuous facility operations and water delivery under earthquake emergency conditions, if possible. City of Huntington Beach Aucrlic+ ?nln Pa -345;82 Item 5. m Page 93 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS-OF-FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report The desalination facility would be designed with one standby RO train to provide additional reliability of water production and supply. Typically, desalination facilities, including the existing desalination facilities in California, are designed to operate with- all available RO trains in operation at all times. During the times of potential outages caused by scheduled or unscheduled maintenance or emergency events, such as an earthquake, these facilities operate at reduced capacity or are down for a certain period of time. The proposed desalination facility would be designed to produce 50 MGD of product water with 13 RO trains, and it would be constructed with an additional 14th RO standby train, which can produce up to 4.2 MGD of water at any time. This additional train would provide increased reliability and redundancy that exceeds current reliability standards and common practices for desalination facility design. The issues of reliability of the supply and emergency service provisions would be dictated by the terms of the institutional agreements negotiated with the regional water purveyors (including Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and MWD) and by the terms of the water supply agreements negotiated with potential customers that would purchase the product water produced at the desalination facility. Thus, impacts would be less than significant. The project is comprised of a water production and treatment facility and all environmental effects of construction and operation of the facility are fully addressed and analyzed in this SEIR. Additionally, the project would not create additional demand for water supplies, and is proposed as a replacement water supply facility, as more fully discussed in Sections 3 and 6 of this SEIR. Therefore, the project would not result in significant adverse effects on water supply. Finding for Orange County Water Distribution System The introduction of the proposed desalination project product water into the existing Orange County distribution system may result in impacts in regards to blended water quality, corrosivity, chlorine residual, disinfection byproduct concentration, taste and odor or hydraulics. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures PW-5 through PW-8, inclusive. Less than significant impact with mitigation. Facts in Support of Finding As explained in Section 4.11 of the SEIR, due to distribution system operations at certain points in the system, desalinated water may blend with other source waters, such as local groundwater or imported water from the MWD. This blending could improve blended water quality, especially if the receiving agencies are predominantly using imported water, which has higher levels of TDS, sulfate, hardness, and disinfection byproducts than desalinated water. The desalination facility would produce drinking water of very high and consistent quality, which meets or exceeds all applicable regulatory requirements established by the EPA and the CDPH. The desalinated water would have approximately 100 mg/L lower total dissolved solids (TDS) than the existing drinking water supplies. The lower drinking water salinity would result in better taste and lower overall water distribution system corrosivity. The desalinated seawater would be softer than the existing water sources. Softer water has a number of benefits, such as better taste, formation of less calcium deposits on household appliances and cutlery, and lower detergent use. Commercial and industrial establishments that currently use softening devices to treat the potable water would also benefit from introduction of the softer desalinated water in the distribution system, as their softening costs may be reduced and some of these users may not need to soften their water anymore (most industrial users typically require water with a hardness below 80 mg/L—as desalinated water would reduce hardness by at least 50%, softening costs ri+"of u1antington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 94 Pa.-346 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report would also be reduced commensurately). Similar to TDS, drinking water of lower sulfate consternation would have a better taste. The desalinated water would have order-of-magnitude lower disinfection byproducts, such as total trihalomethanes and halocetic acids (or TTHMs and HAAs, respectively) concentrations than the existing drinking water. Disinfection byproducts are well known carcinogens and their reduction in the drinking water as a result of the blending of the desalinated water with other water sources would be an added benefit. As such, the blending of desalinated product water with existing imported MWD water is not anticipated to result-in significant impacts. Blending the desalinated product water with existing water from other sources may change the water quality of the blend in terms of its corrosive effect on the existing water distribution system. When evaluating potential short-term and long-term impacts of blending treated waters from different sources, one of the most important considerations is the potential for corrosion of pipes-and residential fixtures. Excessive corrosion over time might lead to colored water in homes—, stained fixtures, pipe failures, and non-compliance with the Lead and Copper Rule. The limits for lead and copper are 15 •g/L (micrograms per liter) and 1.3 mg/L, respectively. Similar to all other potable water sources in the distribution system, product water from the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach would be chemically conditioned at the treatment facility prior to delivery to the distribution system to mitigate its corrosivity. Calcite, in combination with carbon dioxide, would be added for post-treatment- stabilization of the RO water as a source for pH and alkalinity adjustment and hardness addition. A corrosion control study describing in detail the type and amount of corrosion control chemicals planned to be used for this project are presented in the Appendix T of the SEIR. The product water from the seawater desalination facility would be suitable for delivery through the existing water distribution system and would be comparable and compatible to the other water sources currently delivering water to the same system. Prior to delivery to the water distribution system, the desalinated water would be conditioned using calcite and carbon dioxide to achieve the following corrosion control driven water quality parameters, which are known to be consistent with water currently distributed throughout Orange County: • pHof8to8.5 • Langelier Saturation Index (LSI)of 0.0 to 0.5 • Alkalinity of 40 mg/L or higher. These water goals are established based on current practices of the MWD, MWDOC, and most water-agencies and municipalities in Orange County. The water goals are rooted in the Safe Drinking Water Act's water quality standards. These water quality goals would be achieved by the addition of the following chemicals: Calcite dissolution to achieve alkalinity and calcium concentrations of 60 to 80 mg/L as CaCO3 • Carbon dioxide at dosage of 0 to 30 mg/L (average of 6 mg/L). Adopting this proven corrosion control strategy would result in a non-corrosive product that can be seamlessly integrated into the system. City of Huntington Beach Auccl let Wnl n Pa,-347 82 ` Rem 5. - Page 95 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report A corrosion pilot study was conducted and published in conjunction with the development of the Carlsbad Seawater Desalination Facility. This study evaluated the corrosion behavior of fully conditioned and disinfected desalinated seawater and blends of desalinated seawater and treated imported surface water from MWD. The pilot tested several types of plumbing materials, including common distribution system piping and appurtenances and household plumbing materials (lined steel, copper, lead, etc.). The pilot distribution systems were operated to simulate the flow patterns that might be experience in a typical household. No significant regulatory or aesthetic water quality impacts were observed during the extended pilot testing. In fact, observed metal concentrations in the pilot distribution system were found to be lower when using desalinated seawater than compared to treated surface water. A similar distribution system corrosion pilot study was conducted by the -Water Research Foundation and West Basin Municipal Water District at a seawater desalination pilot facility located in El Segundo, CA. Similar and comparable results were observed, thus confirming the results of Ahe corrosion testing. Lower concentrations of regulated metals and other metals associated with household plumbing were observed in pipe sections that received desalinated seawater in comparison to those that received treated imported water. Most oxic groundwater, excepting groundwater sources that are impacted by reducing conditions (for instance those that have iron and manganese or sulfides), is naturally non-corrosive because it is in equilibrium with aquifer materials and has relatively high natural alkalinity. Properly operated typical groundwater wells and properly operated and-treated groundwater wells which require treatment do not result in corrosive potable water for distribution. Therefore groundwater and blends of groundwater with treated surface water and treated desalinated seawater are also not expected to be corrosive and not result in corrosion-related water quality compliance issues in the distribution system. In addition, a corrosion monitoring system would be installed in the proposed transmission pipeline at points of interconnection with the existing water distribution system to ensure that the proposed corrosion control measures are effective and adequate. As such, impacts in regards to corrosion are not anticipated to be significant upon implementation of the design features. The desalinated product water would be disinfected prior to delivery to the distribution system. Chlorine, in the form of sodium hypochlorite, would be added as a disinfectant to meet CDPH water quality standards for potable water disinfection. The desalted water would meet current imported water disinfection methods so as to not change any disinfection protocol currently being used by water agencies. Controlling biological growth in the transmission pipelines and in the receiving reservoirs in the distribution system would be accomplished by adding ammonia to the chlorinated water to form chloramines. Potable water from MWD, as well as that from some local groundwater sources, also contains chloramines as the final residual disinfectant. All of these treated water sources would have compatible chlorine residuals. The desalinated water would be chloraminated by sequential application of sodium hypochlorite and ammonia to achieve a chloramine residual concentration at the point of delivery to the distribution system in a range of 2 to 2.5 mg/L. A detailed description of the proposed chloramination process is provided in Appendix S, Disinfection Byproduct Formation Study. This study confirms that after blending of the chloraminated product water from the desalination facility with disinfected product water from other sources, the chloramine residual of the blend meets the target level in the distribution system of 2 to 2.5 mg/L. The pilot distribution system pilot tests demonstrated that chlorine residuals in desalinated seawater persisted as long as chlorine residuals in treated imported water. As such, impacts in this regard are not anticipated to be significant. rri+,t r%f wuntington Beach August, 2010 Items 5e - Page 96 Pa -348;82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report The desalinated product water may impact the content of disinfection byproducts (known to be carcinogenic) of existing water sources within the distribution system. The two key groups of regulated disinfection byproducts that can be impacted are TTHMs and HHAs. The desalinated water typically has higher concentration of bromides than the other water sources. Bromides may create additional disinfection byproducts. Therefore, when blended with other source waters, the desalinated water may increase the concentration of disinfection byproducts in the other sources. On the other hand, the existing water sources in Orange County typically contain much higher level of organics than the desalinated water, which is practically void of organics. Organics are also a potential source of disinfection byproducts. Therefore, blending of desalinated water with other water sources may have a positive impact on water sources with high organic concentrations. Blending desalinated water with existing sources of supply would result in a product that is comparable to existing supplies and meets all disinfection byproduct limits. Desalinated seawater contains lower levels of organics than existing Orange County sources!-such as the MWD's Diemer filtration facility and all other local groundwater water sources. Therefore, blending of desalinated water with other source waters in the distribution system would have a beneficial effect, and it would lower the overall disinfection byproduct concentration of the blend. The results of Appendix S, Disinfection Byproduct Formation Study, confirm the beneficial effect of the desalinated water on the blended water quality in terms of disinfection byproducts. As such, impacts in this regard are not anticipated to be significant. No measurable impact on odor is expected as a result of the integration of the desalinated water with water from other sources in the distribution system. The desalinated water would be softer and would have lower salinity than the other water sources. Therefore,_ blending of these sources would result in an overall reduction of the salinity and hardness of the water delivered to the customers. Lower salinity and hardness of the blended product water would be beneficial and would have a positive effect on the taste of the water delivered to the customers. As shown in the SEIR, the projected quality of the project water after RO treatment is closely comparable with the finished water it would blend with in the distribution system. In terms of odor, the desalination facility product water would meet the CDPH MCL. In terms of regulated volatile organics, and other compounds that may impact product water taste and odor, product water from the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach would comply with all drinking water standards and does not differ substantially from the water quality of the other sources of product water in the distribution system. Therefore, the desalinated water would be better than or equal to existing water sources in the distribution system in terms of taste and odor. With pores ranging from 0.00005 to 0.0000002 microns (for comparison, a human hair is 200 microns in diameter) the RO membranes would retain and remove over 99.5% of the seawater salinity and over 99% of the metals and organics, which may cause undesirable taste and odor of the product water. A taste test conducted by the San Diego County Water Authority evaluated the ability of consumers to detect changes in the taste of blends of desalinated seawater and treated imported water. Results of the taste test showed that consumers could not distinguish between a range of calcium alkalinity addition, and could not detect the differences between any of the blends of supplies. To protect against potential taste and odor problems associated with the startup of facility operations, just prior to startup, a sequential flushing program would be coordinated with the involved water agencies to minimize any sediment disturbance that might occur due to flow reversal in a portion of the existing distribution system. A flushing program would minimize any aesthetic issues that might be created through flow reversal. In addition, a sampling location would be established near the physical connection of the transmission City of Huntington Beach Aug_l ic+ ')nl n Pa -349-;82 Hem 50 - Page 97 Seawater-Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report pipeline to the OC-44 feeder. A monitoring program would be implemented for this location incorporating the following parameters: coliform bacteria, heterotrophic bacteria, chlorine residual, disinfection byproducts, and aesthetic parameters such as turbidity, odor, and color, as well as corrosion indices. The purpose of this sampling point is to verify on a regular basis that no degradation of water quality has occurred during any period of storage at the facility site or in the transmission pipeline and that mixing of desalinated water with water from other sources continues to be compatible. Desalinated seawater has unique water quality and can cause several changes in the water -quality of treated wastewater used for recycled water irrigation. Because desalinated seawater has lower concentrations of total dissolved solids and hardness, which will reduce the use of water softeners, recycled water will have lower concentrations of these constituents compared to recycled water derived from groundwater and surface water. However, desalinated seawater has slightly higher concentrations of-sodium, chloride, and boron, and these constituents have the potential to exhibit higher concentrations in recycled water than would otherwise be observed using other sources of supply. Irrigation practices in Orange County, particularly the ability to irrigate turf grass-and the ability to grow strawberries and avocados, are sensitive to recycled water quality. If the water quality balance between sodium and calcium exceeds well- known thresholds (as reflected by the SAR or sodium adsorption ratio), then it becomes difficult to infiltrate soil with irrigation water. For-crops, exceeding water quality thresholds can cause reductions in yield and has aesthetic impacts (leaf burn). A mass-balance model was developed to determine the water quality of those supplies, the fraction of water softener use, and the relative sources of supply that influence or are tributary to a wastewater/recycling facility. Recycled water quality was determined to be the source of supply distribution changes, as a function of seasonal variations in water supply (based on historical and predicted flows). Changes in water quality were shown to be minimal during the summer as flows and demands from sources other than the seawater desalination facility increased. Winter water quality demonstrated increases in sodium, chloride, and boron concentrations, but these increases remained within the same range of impact in agricultural criteria (such as SAR and threshold chloride concentrations) as before the introduction of desalinated seawater. Irrigators and farmers manage the current impacts of recycled water on turf grass and crops through the use of irrigation flow pattern and management techniques, and through the use of soil amendments to maintain productivity and permeability. The use of desalinated seawater will not significantly change the impacts to recycled water irrigation that is currently experienced without using desalinated supplies. It is expected that the current use of softener will decrease with the introduction of desalinated water and that resulting water quality and economic benefits of softer water will accrue to the region. Implementation of the proposed project may have hydraulic impacts on the regional water distribution system. A total of three new pump stations and modification to an additional existing pump station would be necessary for operation of the project: 1) a product water pump station at the desalination facility site, 2) the OC-44 underground booster pump station in Newport Beach, and 3) the Coastal Junction underground booster pump station in Irvine; and 4) modifications to the existing OC-35 pump station would also be required. The product water delivery system includes several existing transmission mains: • OC-44 Transmission Line • East Orange County Feeder#2 (EOCF #2) (-if"of Huntington Beach August, 2010 Item 50 - Page 98 Pa,-350 s2 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report • Irvine Cross Feeder • Orange County Feeder Extension • Coastal Supply Line • Aufdenkamp Transmission Main • Joint (formerly Tri-Cities)Transmission Main • West Orange County Water Board Feeder 1 • West Orange County Water Board Feeder 2 The Pressure Surge Analysis in the appendix provides a discussion of potential impacts of the four pump stations associated with the project, and evaluates potential effects of potential pressure changes associated with the proposed pump stations on the existing water delivery system. The results of the pressure surge analysis of the product water delivery system show that the most significant hydraulic transient events will result from a loss of power to the booster pump stations. Power failures are typically unpredictable and will therefore occur at the booster pump stations at irregular intervals. Following a loss of power the pumps, there will be a rapid drop in both the flow rate and discharge pressure combined with a rapid increase in the suction pressure at the booster pump stations. The results of the power failure simulations for the system show that traveling low-pressure (i.e., pressure drop) waves will be created on the discharge side of each of the-booster pump stations by the drop in pressure. Simultaneously, a pressure upsurge wave is created on the suction side of each booster pump station following pump power failure. These high and low pressure waves will propagate out from the booster pump stations and into the suction and discharge pipelines, respectively, toward the demand locations and other booster pump stations. The maximum hydraulic grade line (HGL) elevation that results from the upsurge created by a loss of power to the OC-44 booster pump station is predicted to exceed the set point HGL of the pressure relief valve on the OC-44 Transmission Main. The opening of the pressure relief valve creates a pressure drop wave that is predicted to drop the minimum HGL elevation sufficiently to create vapor pressure in both the proposed project water delivery pipelines and OC-44 Transmission Main. Similarly, a pressure upsurge wave created by the Coastal Junction Booster Pump Station will propagate from EOCF#2 into the Irvine Cross Feeder and Orange County Feeder Extension, and is predicted to exceed the maximum allowable HGL in the Irvine Cross Feeder as well as the set point HGL elevation for the pressure relief valve on the Orange County Feeder Extension. The opening of the Orange County Feeder Extension pressure relief valve also generates a significant pressure drop wave that is predicted to create vapor pressure in the pipeline. Vapor pressure conditions are also predicted in the Irvine Cross Feeder and Joint Transmission Mains following loss of power to the booster pump stations. The duration of the low pressure will be long enough for vapor cavities to form in the pipelines. Upon re-pressurization of the pipelines by water hammer wave reflections, any vapor cavities that form will collapse and in the process produce very large magnitude positive pressures that could damage the pipelines and possibly create premature leaks. When subjected to negative pressures, a leak may become a source of pathogen intrusion. If the pipelines do not have sufficient strength, they may collapse under the large magnitude negative pressures associated with vapor pressure. In addition, the combination air and vacuum relief valves installed on the existing transmission mains are predicted to close suddenly upon re-pressurization of the City of Huntington Beach Aucclle+ 'Xnln Pal-351 82 `Item 5. - Page 99 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report pipeline, which could damage the floats and create additional adverse pressures in the product water delivery system. To eliminate large negative pressures and the possibility of vapor cavity formation in the delivery pipeline system above, surge protection measures, including installation of pressurized surge tanks are incorporated into the project design-for the product water pump station and the OC-44 booster pump station, as described in Section 3.4 in the SEIR. In addition to the proposed surge tanks, additional hydraulic modifications would be needed for the existing water distribution system have been incorporated into the project in order to avoid potential effects related to pressure surges and to facilitate product water delivery. These modifications are described in Section 3.4 of the SEIR, and in detail in the appendices, and generally include valves, bypass structures, and other minor modifications on the following transmission mains: • OC-44 Transmission Line • East Orange County Feeder#2 (EOCF #2) • Irvine Cross Feeder • Aufdenkamp Transmission Main • Joint (formerly Tri-Cities) Transmission Main • West Orange County Water Board Feeder 2 Additional modeling would be performed during the design phase of the project because the specific design and specifications for the booster pump stations is not fully developed at this time, and the surge analysis modeling is sensitive to the specific design and configuration of pumps and valves. However, it is not anticipated that substantial modifications would be required to achieve the level of protection to existing water transmission facilities that is proposed with the proposed project features. With the proposed project design features as described in Section 3.4 and Appendix V, no significant impacts to existing water facilities would result, and no water quality impacts from potential damage to facilities is anticipated. L. IMPACTS RELATED TO CLIMATE CHANGE (SEIR pages 4.12-1 to 4.11-34) Section 4.12 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential impacts related to climate change. Those potential impacts are addressed in Section 3.0-L of this Statement of Findings of Facts. 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WOULD REMAIN SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE AFTER MITIGATION A. CONSTRUCTION RELATED AIR QUALITY IMPACTS (SEIR pages 4.9-1 to 4.9-64 and pages 5-24 to 5-25) Section 4.9 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential short-term construction related air quality impacts. Section 5.3 (at pages 5-24 to 5-25) of the SEIR addresses the project's potential cumulative short-term construction related air quality impacts. Those potential impacts are addressed in this Section. The remaining construction related topics are addressed in ihi of Wi intington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 100 Pa.-352;82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Section 4.0-1 of this Statement of Findings of Facts. The remaining cumulative impact related topics are addressed in Section 3.0-M of this Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for Short-Term Air Quality The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may have adverse short-term construction related impacts, both individually and cumulatively, in regards to air quality. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR, including standard conditions, project design features and incorporation of mitigation measures CON-10 through CON-14. In addition, the South Coast Air Quality Management District and California Air Resources Board have jurisdiction over stationary and mobile emission sources, respectively. Even after incorporation of mitigation measures CON-10 to CON-14, the Project will result in unavoidable significant impacts, both individually and cumulatively, in regards to short-term- construction related reactive gases including NO, PM,o, and PM2.5. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible additional mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the SEIR. The City of Huntington Beach is adopting-the Statement of Overriding Considerations set forth in Section 7.0 of this Statement of Findings and Facts to address the individual and cumulative, short-term construction air quality impacts-of the project. Facts in Support of Finding The project proposes the demolition of three fuel oil storage tanks and construction of a seawater desalination facility. See Section 4.9 regarding the types of equipment anticipated for such a project. The SEIR found that short-term construction emissions would have impacts that would be significant and unavoidable for NOx during construction for 27 months. Section 4.9 also determined exhaust emissions from construction activities including emissions associated with the transport of machinery and supplies to and from the on-site desalination facility, emissions produced on site as the equipment is used, and emissions from trucks transporting materials to and from the site would create a significant impact related to NOx. Despite implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, overall aggregate emissions would exceed- the SCAQMD standards for NOx. Further, an LST analysis found that during construction of the proposed project, significant construction-related emissions for PM,o and PM2.5 would occur, despite the incorporation-of all feasible mitigation. Thus, construction related air emissions would be significant and unavoidable. Section 4.9 of the SEIR found that fugitive dust would be mitigated by implementing dust control techniques (i.e., daily watering), limitations on construction hours, and adherence to SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 (which require watering of inactive and perimeter areas, limiting vehicle speeds, track out requirements, etc.). Section 4.9 of the SEIR also determined the highest concentration of ROG emissions would be generated during the application of architectural coatings on the building. As required by law, all architectural coatings for the proposed project would comply with SCAQMD Regulation XI, Rule 1113—Architectural Coating, listed in the SCAQMD Rules and Regulations. Rule 1113 provides specifications on painting practices as well as the ROG contents within paints used for within the District. In addition, mitigation measure CON-13 requires the use of high-pressure-low- volume paint applicators with a minimum transfer efficiency of at least 50 percent, using pre- painted materials, and buildings utilizing materials that do not require painting. Project construction would not result in an exceedance of ROG emissions with implementation of mitigation measure CON-13, and impacts would therefore be less than significant. City of Huntington Beach A,im ief ')nl n Pa.-353 1 82 Item 5. - Page 101 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Project construction would result in emissions of diesel particulate from heavy construction equipment and trucks accessing the site. Diesel particulate is characterized as a toxic air contaminant by the State of California. The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment has identified carcinogenic and chronic noncarcinogenic effects from long-term exposure, but has not identified health effects due to short-term exposure to diesel exhaust. Due to the temporary nature of project construction, and because the project would not generate significant diesel emissions from construction equipment or trucks (as indicated in the LST analysis above), the project would not result in a significant health risk. Cumulative Short-Term Air Quality Impacts As discussed under Section 5.3 regarding cumulative projects, because construction air quality impacts can tend to have a noticeable localized effect in addition to their contribution to the overall regional air basin, projects in close proximity to the proposed project site were evaluated for short-term, construction-related impacts. The pollutants generated from construction of these projects could result in an impact on ambient air quality that would overlap with those of the proposed project if the construction work occurs-in close proximity and at the--same time. Potentially significant and unmitigable short-term, construction-related impacts were identified that would contribute to potentially significant cumulative impacts. Therefore, short-term, construction-related air quality impacts, including the project's contribution-to those impacts, are considered significant. B. IMPACTS RELATED TO INDIRECT GROWTH-INDUCEMENT OUTSIDE OF ORANGE COUNTY (SEIR page 5-16) Section 5.2 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential for growth inducement. The project's potential for indirect growth inducement outside of Orange County is addressed in this Section. All other project-related growth inducing impacts are addressed in Section 3.0-N of this Statement of Findings of Facts. Finding for Indirect Growth-Inducement Outside of Orange County The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach may have indirect growth inducing impacts outside of Orange County. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible additional mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the SEIR. The City of Huntington Beach is adopting the Statement of Overriding Considerations set forth in Section 7.0 of this Statement of Findings and Facts to address the indirect growth inducing impacts of the project outside of Orange County. Facts in Support of Finding As noted in Section 3.0-N. of these Findings, the SEIR concluded that the project would not have the potential to result in growth-inducement within the project service area (Orange County). However, the replacement of imported water supplies with desalinated water supplies produced by the project could have the effect of making the imported water supplies that are displaced by the desalinated water supplies available for use outside of Orange County. Determination of the specific potential indirect growth-inducing effects outside of Orange County would require speculation that is beyond the scope of the environmental analysis for the Project. In addition, significant effects related to indirect growth outside of the boundaries of Orange County that may occur remain unmitigated. (rife of Wim ington Beach August, 2010 Item 5® - Page 10 Pa.-354 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 6.0 FINDINGS REGARDING PROJECT ALTERNATIVES In conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, the SEIR included a comparative impact assessment of "alternatives to the proposed project." The primary purpose for this section is to provide decision makers and the public with a "reasonable range" of project alternatives that could feasibly attain most of the basic project objectives, while avoiding or substantially lessening any of the project's significant adverse environmental effects. Important considerations for this alternatives analysis include the following (as noted in Section 15126.6): • An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project • An EIR should identify "alternatives that were considered by the lead agency but were rejected as infeasible during the scoping process..." • Reasons for rejecting an alternative include the following_ o Failure to meet most of the basic project objectives o Infeasibility o Inability to avoid significant environmental effects. Other than individual and cumulative short-term air quality emissions associated with construction activities and the possibility of indirect growth inducement outside of Orange County, the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) has not identified any other "unavoidable" significant impacts of the project, as all other potentially significant impacts can be mitigated to less-than-significant levels. However, certain cumulative impacts, to which the project would contribute, may be slightly reduced with some of the alternatives. Project-related cumulative impacts include air quality and noise, although the project's contribution is not "cumulatively considerable" as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section15126.6. As noted in Section 3.5, Project Need and Objectives, the proposed project's basic objectives are to: • Provide a reliable local source of potable water to Orange County that is sustainable independent of climatic conditions and the availability of imported water supplies or local groundwater supplies • Provide product water that meets all the potable (drinking water) requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and the Department of Public Health (DPH) • Reduce salt imbalance of current imported water supplies by providing a potable water source with lower salt loads for blending with existing supplies • Remediate the subject site of onsite contaminants resulting from approximately 35 years of use as a fuel oil storage facility in order to protect the health and safety of those in the surrounding community • Create ecosystem and biologic resources benefits that may accrue due to decreased pressures on existing water resources and reduced contamination within receiving waters • Minimize demands on the existing imported water system. City of Huntington Beach A,ins ict )nl n Pa.-355 1 82 Item 5. - Page 103 Seawater-Desalirration Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report The following alternatives to the proposed project are discussed: the "No Project" alternative, "Alternative Site" alternative, "Alternative Ownership and Operation" alternative, "Alternative Intake and Discharge Designs" alternative, "Alternative Facility Configuration" alternative, "Reduced Facility Size" alternative, and the "Environmentally Superior" alternative. A comparison of issues with implementation of identified alternatives is provided in Table 6-1 of the SEIR, Comparison of Alternatives, (page 6-2). The No Project Alternative None of the impacts associated with the proposed development and construction activities -would occur if the "No Project" alternative were selected. Implementation of this alternative would leave the existing portion of the fuel oil storage facility in place, and would avoid any adverse physical or environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. Existing geologic, soils, and aesthetic conditions in the area would remain the same. Air quality, noise, and traffic impacts due to construction of the desalination facility, pipeline, and pump stations would not occur with the "No Project" alternative. Water planning professionals have forecasted that water demands would increase in the Southern California area, and have specifically identified resource targets to help meet projected demands, including local seawater desalination facilities. (See Section 3.5 of the SEIR, Project Need and Objectives, for a-discussion of regional and statewide water planning.) Consequently, adoption of the "No Project" alternative would result in shifting the obligation for meeting a portion (up to 56,000 acre-feet-per year [afy]) of future water demands from the project to: (1) increased conservation efforts (efficiency improvements and reduced consumption); (2) increased use of imported water supplies; (3) increased use of groundwater supplies; (4) construction of additional local water supply projects; and/or (5) construction of seawater desalination projects elsewhere in Orange County. Therefore, in some instances, the environmental impacts associated with the "No Project" alternative may be greater than those associated with the project. While the "No Project" alternative, including the four alternative water supply components evaluated, may provide a reliable supply of water to Orange County, it does not provide a "local source" that is sustainable and independent of climactic conditions (in other words, "drought proof'), or sustainable and independent of the availability of imported water supplies or local groundwater supplies. In addition, the "No Project" alternative will not meet the project objectives of reducing the salt imbalance of current imported water supplies or of minimizing demands on the imported water system. Finally, the "No Project" alternative will not remediate the project site. The "No Project" alternative is not presently being considered because it fails to meet most of the basic project objectives. In addition, the existing project site degrades the aesthetic character of the vicinity and, if not remediated as proposed, may pose a significant health risk due to petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. Furthermore, the "No Project" alternative would not realize the project benefit of providing a "drought-proof," high-quality, new potable water supply. Alternative Site Alternative:Alternative Locations within a 2-Mile Radius of the HBGS A preliminary investigation of available land (5 acres or larger) within a 2-mile radius of the HBGS was preformed. Several site were identified and shown in Appendix Z, including parks, school sites and other open areas. Of the available open-area parks and schools, only 3 parks consisted of more than 5 acres. However, each of these parks are actively used for recreation by the local community. The other open areas within 2-miles of the HBGS included wetlands, the Ascon/Nesi site, and several other sites currently reserved by the owners for future rif"of Ni intington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 104 Pa -356 s2 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report development. None of these areas were found to be feasible for implementation of the proposed desalination facility. Alternative Site Alternative:Alternative Locations-Outside the City of Huntington Beach Several other locations outside of the City of Huntington Beach have been considered for this project, including the mouth of San Juan Creek (within the City of Dana Point), San Onofre (within San Diego County), and along the coast of the City of San Clemente(refer to Figure-6-1, Alternative Site Location Map, and Table 6-2, Alternative Site Comparison in the SEIR). These alternatives are not being considered for a variety of reasons, such as the 56,000 afy size of the proposed project (San Juan Creek), environmental concerns of a new ocean intake/discharge system (San Clemente), and/or engineering/acquisition issues (San Onofre). The San Juan Creek and San Clemente sites would have greater impacts due to sensitive surrounding uses and the need to create a new ocean intake/outfall. Implementation of the "Alternative Site's alternative would not avoid the project's identified unavoidable construction related air quality impact, and may result in significant aesthetic and/or marine biological impacts. This alternative is-not presently under consideration. Alternative Ownership and-Operation Alternative The Alternative Ownership and Operation alternative would not change any of the design or operational features of the project. Rather this alternative consists of the exact same project owned and operated by a public (not private) entity. Consequently, this alternative and the project as proposed would result in the same potential impacts on the environment. Alternative Intake and Discharge Designs Alternative Alternative Intake: The following discussion relates to alternative methods for ocean water intake systems. The most common subsurface type intake systems, beach wells and seabed filtration systems, could be considered as alternative intake systems for the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach. These subsurface intake facilities have one key advantage over the project: the source water they collect is pretreated via filtration through the subsurface sand/seabed formations in the area of source water extraction. There are three types of beach wells typically utilized for the intake of seawater: (1) vertical intake wells, (2) slant intake wells, and (3) horizontal intake wells (also referred to as Ranney wells). A description of each is provided herein, followed by a summary of feasibility and potential environmental effects of such well systems. Vertical intake wells consist of water collection systems that are drilled vertically into a coastal aquifer. These wells consist of a non-metallic casting (typically, fiberglass reinforced pipe), well screens, and a stainless steel submersible or vertical turbine pump (see Figure 6-2, Vertical Beach Well). The well casting diameter is between 6 and 24 inches, and well depth does not usually exceed 250 feet. The vertical intake wells are usually less costly than the horizontal wells and the slant wells but their yield is relatively small. As described in Appendix AA, Evaluation of Alternative Desalination Plant Intake Technologies, a unit well yield of 1,560 gallons per minute (gpm) (2.2 million gallons per day (MGD))would be expected from a properly constructed, large-diameter vertical production well for the site-specific conditions of the coastal aquifer near the Huntington Beach desalination facility site. In order to deliver 152 MGD of source seawater for the project, 69 duty and 17 standby wells of a 2.2 MGD intake capacity each would have to be operational. A total of 86 vertical intake wells would be constructed under this alternative. This would result in the need to impact 2.4 miles of coastline to collect and transport the source water to the proposed desalination facility through the use of the vertical intake system. City of Huntington Beach Awdiet )nln Pa�-357182 Item 5. - Page 105 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach -FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Slant wells are subsurface intake wells drilled at an angle and extending under the ocean floor to maximize the collection of seawater and the beneficial effect of the natural filtration of the collected water through the ocean floor sediments. The collection of 152 MGD of seawater needed for this project would require the use of 35 slant intake wells with a capacity of 3,000 gpm (4.3 MGD) each. These slant wells would be grouped in clusters of three. The distance between the well clusters would be 700 to 1,000 feet. The total length of beach occupied by slant wells would be approximately 4.6 miles. Operation of the slant wells at a total capacity of 100 MGD or more would cause the water level in the vicinity of the wells to drop from 5 to 60 feet below ground surface and the water table in 4,000- foot-wide zone located parallel to the shore and- perpendicular to the well-field line. Slant wells are similar in cost to the horizontal intake wells discussed below. Horizontal (Ranney) intake wells consist of a caisson that extends below the ground surface with water well collector screens (laterals) projected out horizontally from inside the caisson into the surrounding aquifer. The caisson is constructed of reinforced concrete that may be between 10 and 30 feet inside diameter with a wall thickness from -approximately 1.5 to 3.0 feet.-Since the laterals in the Ranney wells are placed horizontally, a higher rate of source water collection is possible than with vertical wells. This allows the same intake water quantity to be collected with fewer wells. Individual Ranney wells are typically designed to collect between 0.5 to 5.0 MGD of source water. Based on the Evaluation of Alternative Desalination Plant Subsurface Intake Technologies by Water Globe Consulting, the comparative analysis utilized wells with a capacity of 5 MGD. These larger capacity intake wells require the use of vertical turbine pumps, which motors cannot be submersed in water, therefore these vertical turbine pumps must be housed above the high tide line. In addition, the size and servicing of the well pumps, piping, electrical, instrumentation, and other auxiliary equipment of large-capacity wells require that the location of the pump house be a minimum of 10 feet above beach grade. The caisson depth varies according to site-specific geologic conditions, ranging from approximately 30 feet to over 150 feet. The number, length, and location of the horizontal laterals are determined based on a detailed hydrogeologic investigation. Typically, the diameter of the laterals ranges from 8 to 12 inches and their length extends up to 200 feet. The size of the lateral screens is selected to accommodate the grain-size of the underground soil formation. If necessary, an artificial gravel- pack filter is installed around the screen to suit finer-grained deposits. In large intake applications, such as that shown on Figure 6-4, Horizontal (Ranney) Beach Well Photo, the horizontal beach wells are typically coupled with the intake pump station installed above the well caisson. Figure 6-4 shows one of the three 3.8 MGD horizontal (Ranney) intake beach wells (two active intake wells/pumps and one standby well/pump) for the largest existing seawater desalination facility located on the Pacific Ocean coast in North America—the 3.8 MGD water supply facility for the Pemex Salina Cruz refinery in Mexico. The Ranney wells could collect more water per well and deliver the total flow of 152 MGD needed for operation of 50 MGD seawater desalination facility. Even if ideal hydro-geotechnical conditions for this type of wells are assumed to exist (i.e., each well could collect 5 MGD of source water), horizontal well intake construction would include the installation of a total of 38 wells. The total length of coastal seashore impacted by this type of well intake would be 2.8 miles (Appendix AA). For 38 Ranney wells with an individual capacity of 5 MGD each, and a minimum distance between the individual wells of 400 feet, the footprint would be 15,200 feet long (400 feet x 38 wells = 15,200 feet (approx. 2.8 miles)). Figure 6-5, Horizontal (Ranney) Beach Well System Illustration, shows the approximate size and configuration of a horizontal intake well system for a 10 MGD seawater desalination facility with five intake wells. Figure 6-6, Conceptual Horizontal (Ranney) Well Intake Configuration at Huntington Beach, gives a general r'i+„ of lay intington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 106 Pa,-358 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report representation of the shoreline area in front of HBGS that would be impacted by the construction of a Ranney well intake system. Any one of the site-specific conditions would render subsurface intakes more impactful to the environment than the project because it would result in either irreversible damage to the Talbert Marsh, Brookhurst Marsh, and the Magnolia Marsh and negate years of restoration measures, result irG a number of negative environmental impacts and human health risks, including the following: (1) detrimental environmental impact of intake well operations on the adjacent Talbert Marsh, Brookhurst Marsh, and the Magnolia Marsh due to dewatering; (2) poor water quality of the Talbert Aquifer in terms of ammonia, bacterial contamination and lack of oxygen; (3) interception of contaminated groundwater from nearby Ascon Landfill, which may introduce carcinogenic Hydrocarbons in the Source water supply of the desalination facility; (4) possible interception of injection water from Talbert Barrier by the intake which may impair the function of this barrier to protect against seawater intrusion; (5) subsidence of public roads and structures due to-drawdown of the groundwater table; and (6) impairment if the aesthetic value of-the coastal shore by the obtrusive aboveground intake structures. None of these potential environmental impacts are associated with the use of the cooling water system-from the existing HBGS as source water for the project. The proposed intake system would not physically alter the HBGS intake or discharge system, and it would provide a more than adequate supply of source water and dilution water. None of the proposed alternative intake systems would be an acceptable substitute to the proposed use of the existing HBGS cooling water system as the supplier of source water for the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach. Alternative discharge: The only existing ocean discharge facility (besides the HBGS outfall) in the project site vicinity is the 120-inch, 4.5-mile ocean outfall utilized at the OCSD regional wastewater treatment facility (located approximately 1.5 miles southeast of the proposed project site). The City inquired with OCSD regarding the feasibility of discharging the proposed desalination project's concentrated seawater discharge (50 MGD) through the OCSD's outfall. In a response letter dated June 24, 2004, OCSD indicated that, based on hydraulic discharge capacity performed for the OCSD's 1999 Strategic Plan, capacity within the OCSD outfall is not available for the proposed desalination project. Analysis of future wastewater projections shows that the-capacity of the 120-inch outfall is anticipated to be exceeded once every 3 years by the year 2020, requiring the use of the District's emergency 1-mile ocean outfall (Herberg, pers. - comm. 2004). As such, the use of the OCSD outfall for concentrated seawater discharge is not considered a feasible alternative to the proposed project. All hydrodynamic analysis performed for the SEIR is based on the proposed project utilizing the existing HBGS outfall infrastructure. The analysis determines the dilution and dispersion of the concentrated seawater that would be added to the discharge stream by the proposed desalination facility, which is discussed throughout this document as the proposed project. Yet, another outfall alternative would be to install a diffuser on the existing discharge tower. The existing discharge tower produces a discharge point about mid-depth in the water column, making the retrofit of a conventional diffuser with lateral discharge arms infeasible from a structural strength and support perspective. Given these structural limitations of the existing infrastructure, it appears that the only viable diffuser concept is a velocity cap retrofitted to the discharge tower, identical to the one that already exists on the intake tower. A velocity cap would provide four lateral diffuser ports with rectangular cross section, producing four horizontal discharge jets. The jets would likely need to be oriented in the cross-shore and along shore directions, parallel to the walls of the discharge tower. With the velocity cap added, the City of Huntington Beach A,ine tcf ')n1 n Pa.-359:82 Item 5e a Page 107 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report discharge cross-sectional area is reduced from its present 346.5 to 225 square feet. Consequently, discharge velocities will increase from 0.34 feet/second directed vertically upward for low-flow and stand-alone operations without a velocity cap, to 0.53 feet/seccond directed horizontally with a velocity cap. For flow augmented stand-alone operations utilizing 152 MGD of source water intake flow rate, discharge velocities will increase from 0.46 feet/second for low-flow without a velocity cap, to 0.70 feet/second with a velocity cap. As further described in Appendix AC, Supplemental Report on_. the Effects of a Retrofitted Diffuser on the Discharge Outfall for the Ocean Desalination Project at Huntington Beach, CA, the velocity cap diffuser would cause faster dilution of the sea salts beyond 600 feet from the outfall (far-field), but would result in higher salinities on the seafloor within 600 feet from the outfall (near-field). The velocity cap diffuser eliminates the concentrated seawater surface boil and increases the dilution factor at the shoreline from 32 to 1 to 38 to 1. However, these favorable far-field and inshore effects produced by the diffuser are offset by increased benthic impacts near the outfall. The velocity-cap diffuser limits the dilution volume to only the lower half of the water column near the outfall where salinity is highest. Without the velocity cap the concentrated seawater discharge takes a vertical trajectory toward the sea surface, forming a -surface boil, before subsiding back to the seafloor, passing through the full depth of the water column in the immediate neighborhood of the outfall, and thereby increasing the near-field dilution. Therefore, the diffuser would increase the seabed salinity at the base of the outfall under both the co-located and stand-alone conditions. Because the discharge diffuser produces mixed results in terms of salinity dispersion, and because the project would not result in significant impacts related to elevated salinity (see Section 4.10 of the SEIR), the diffuser discharge alternative does not provide substantial benefits in terms of impact avoidance or reduction, and is therefore not being further considered. Alternative Facility Configuration Alternative As discussed in Chapter 3.1 of the SEIR, since the 2005 REIR was certified and the project approved, certain circumstances surrounding the project have changed and new information that was not known and could not have been known at the time that the 2005 REIR was certified, has become available. The site plan that the 2005 REIR was based on has been modified at the request of AES to consolidate the construction activities as close together as possible by shifting the RO building and associated facilities to the north. The revised site plan (that is addressed as the proposed project in this SEIR) would allow AES to utilize their property to the fullest extent possible. As a result of the new site plan for the proposed project, and because the project has been considered and approved by the City of Huntington Beach, the 2005 site plan has been added as the Alterative Facility Configuration to the proposed project. The operation of the proposed desalination facility would generally remain the same. As shown in Figure 6-10, Alternative Facility Configuration, in the SEIR this site plan would result in the construction of the RO building, electrical room, chemical storage area, administration building, and pretreatment filters would be constructed where the existing fuel oil storage tank #3 is located and would include the area south of this tank as well (the area formerly referred to as the southeast fuel oil storage tank). The location of the product water storage tanks would be located in the northwestern corner of the project site consistent with the proposed project in this SEIR. All of the building dimensions and equipment specifications would be the same as proposed with the project in this document, but would be rearranged to fit generally within the site boundaries identified in the 2005 REIR. Impacts associated with the alternative facility configuration would generally be similar to those identified for the proposed project, and mitigation measures identified for the proposed project would also be applicable to the alternative. The alternative facility configuration would provide a rit"of Wiintington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 108 Pa,-360 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report less-consolidated site design and reduce AES' ability to utilize their property to the fullest extent possible. Therefore, this alternative is not being further considered. Reduced Facility Size Alternative The proposed desalination project is currently designed to incorporate RO technology to remove impurities from seawater to produce approximately 50 MGD (56,000 afy) of potable water for distribution tc local water agencies. One alternative to the proposed-project would be to reduce the output of project water to approximately 25 MGD. The design and operation of the proposed desalination facility would generally remain the same. However, this alternative would reduce the size of the facility, the amount of seawater required to produce water, and the amount of concentrated seawater discharged back into the HBGS outfall. The 25 MGD alternative would not significantly reduce potential environmental impacts when compared to the proposed project. In addition, this alternative would result in a substantial decrease in the amount of desalinated water that could be produced, and thus a substantial increase in the cost of the desalinated water. Consequently, the 25 MGD alternative would not achieve-the project objectives to provide a sufficient amount of water that would meet the future water needs projected by Orange County water purveyors, and would reduce overall water supply reliability that is sustainable and independent of climatic conditions. A discussion of potential impacts is discussed in the SEIR. While the Reduced Facility Size alternative may result in reduced impacts in comparison to the proposed project, the 25 MGD alternative would result in providing water at a cost that would not be acceptable to Orange County water purveyors, and would not produce a sufficient amount of desalinated water to meet projected future demand._Implementation of the 25 MGD alternative would not avoid the project's identified unavoidable construction related air quality impact, and would reduce the water quality benefits of the project as proposed. As such, this alternative is not being further considered. Environmentally Superior Alternative The SEIR determined that none of the above alternatives are considered "environmentally superior" to the proposed project, except for the "No Project" alternative. In this case, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires identification of an "environmentally superior" alternative from among the other alternatives. Implementation of the project on an alternative site, while dependent on site-specific variables, is not anticipated to significantly reduce impacts, as alternative site implementation is expected to result in overall similar environmental impacts. The "Alternative Ownership and Operation" alternative would result in exactly the same environmental impacts as the proposed project. A hypothetical reduction in facility size can be argued to be "environmentally superior", based superficially on the reduction in facility size and corresponding reduction in traffic, air and noise impacts. However, reducing facility size and output would not substantially reduce any significant impacts. Other design options for intake and discharge either do not provide substantial environmental benefits, or result in greater environmental impacts overall. Consequently, and in accordance with the mandate of CEQA, the "Reduced Facility Size" alternative is selected as the environmentally superior alternative in comparison to the proposed project. 7.0 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Pursuant to Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, decision-makers are required to balance the benefits of a project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining City of Huntington Beach AP-110 9n1n Pa.-361-;82 Item 5. - Page 109 Seawater Desalination Project at-Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report whether to approve a project. In the event the benefits of a project outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable". The State CEQA Guidelines require that, when a public agency allows for the occurrence of significant effects that are identified within the SEIR but are not at least substantially mitigated, the agency shall set forth in writing the specific reasons the action was supported. To the extent the significant effects of a project are not avoided or substantially lessened to a level of insignificance, the City of Huntington Beach, having reviewed and considered the information contained within the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the project, and having reviewed and considered the information contained within the public record, and having balanced the benefits of the project against the unavoidable effects which remain, finds such unmitigated effects to be acceptable in consideration of the following overriding considerations discussion. The City finds that all feasible mitigation measures have been imposed to lessen project impacts to a less than significant level where feasible, and furthermore, that alternatives to the project are either infeasible because they have greater environmental impacts,-do not provide the necessary benefits of the project, do not eliminate the-project's unavoidable significant air quality impact, or are otherwise socially or economically infeasible. The environmental analysis undertaken for the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach indicates that, while mitigation measures would be effective in reducing the level of certain short-term air quality impacts, the project may still result in significant adverse direct and cumulative impacts to short-term air quality. It should be noted that the project's unavoidable adverse impacts would occur under current General Plan designations. In addition, a potential indirect growth inducing- impacts of the project outside of Orange County may occur. Determination of the specific potential indirect growth inducing effects outside of Orange County would require speculation that is beyond the scope of the environmental analysis of this project. The City of Huntington Beach, as lead agency and decision-maker for the project, has reviewed and considered the information contained in the SEIR prepared for the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach and the public record. The City finds that the benefits of the Project include the following: ❖The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will provide a reliable source of potable water to Orange County that is sustainable independent of climatic conditions and the availability of imported water supplies and local groundwater supplies. The project offers Orange County's water agencies up to 50 million gallons per day (MGD) or 56,000 acre-feet of water per year to include in their portfolio of available water resources. Water conservation efforts have resulted in successfully stretching the developed water supply, and more gains from conservation are projected for the future. Still, the California Department of Water Resources predicts that the South Coast Region (and the entire State) will face continued water shortages. The water produced by the project is an important drought-proof, renewable supply that will enhance the overall portfolio of water resources available to Orange County water agencies. ❖The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will provide product water that meets the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and the California Department of Public Health (CPDH). rifxi of Wi intington Beach August, 2010 Item 5. - Page 110 Pa -362;82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 4-The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will reduce the salt imbalance of current imported water supplies by providing a potable water source with lower salt loads for blending with existing supplies. -:-The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will remediate the subject site of on site contaminants resulting from approximately 35 years of use as a fuel oil storage facility thereby protecting the health and safety—of those in the surrounding community. ❖The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will create ecosystem and biological resources benefits that may accrue due to decreased pressures on existing water sources. The project could provide-operational flexibility for the management of the Orange County Groundwater Basin. The project will also replace imported supplies transported from Northern California. ❖The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will reduce demands on the existing imported water system. Southern California could not exist without its extensive imported water supply system. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California ("MWD"), together with many local water agencies, operates numerous water facilities to transport, store and recycle water supplies to meet the needs of Orange County and the surrounding Southern California region. Given the announced cutbacks of water supply and the continuing environmental water demands on the State Water Project in Northern California, the water produced by the Seawater Desalination Project -at Huntington Beach will be dedicated by Orange County water agencies to replacing existing water supplies for current Orange County residents and future generations. ❖The Huntington Beach Desalination Project will result in an equal demand reduction on both the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California's (MWD) imported water supplies. This will allow MWD, on a long-term average basis, to reduce its need for expanded transfers and exchanges. Likewise, MWDOC will reduce its need for marginal supplies including transfers, due to the production of 56,000 acre feet of locally supplies annually by the Huntington Beach project. ❖The Seawater Desalination Facility will include a voluntary Energy Minimization and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan that incorporates the offset of imported water and results in a net carbon neutral water facility. ❖ The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will provide monitoring of the Pacific Ocean water in the vicinity of the HBGS intake pipeline located offshore from Huntington Beach. ❖ The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will serve high quality desalinated water through portions of the City distribution system and assist in drought proofing the City'swater supply. ❖ The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will provide the City with the direct acquisition of 3 MGD of locally controlled, high quality, drought-proof drinking water at a discounted rate of the cost of imported water. City of Huntington Beach A­.��c+ ')MO Pa.-363 182 Item 5. - Page I I I Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach -FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report ❖ The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will provide the City with an option to obtain an additional 4 MGD of water during a water supply emergency. ❖ The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will improve the aesthetics of the area through the demolition of three unused 40-foot high fuel storage tanks and replacing them with lower profile, modern, and more attractive structures. ❖ The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will install perimeter improvements including a 10 -foot (Edison) to 20 foot (Newland) landscape planter and an eight foot high wall along the project's street frontage for an overall cohesive appearance with the HBGS facility along Newland Street. ❖ The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will improve the circulation in the area through the dedication and improvement of additional right- of-way along Edison Avenue. The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will provide a new source of long term annual property tax revenue for the city, especially the redevelopment zone located in the South East area of the City. ❖ The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will provide a new source of long term annual revenue for the City from the Franchise Agreement. ❖ The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will provide a new source of revenue from the lease/sale of currently unused property acquired by the City for a future water storage tank, while protecting the City's ownership interest in the tank site property. ❖ The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will provide higher water pressure in a portion of City's distribution system, thereby allowing the City to realize a cost savings. ❖ Construction of Seawater Desalination Project and delivery system will allow the City to avoid tens of millions of dollars in water infrastructure capital costs and long-term maintenance and operating expenses ❖ The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach will provide these benefits at no cost to the taxpayers. Based on this Statement of Findings of Facts and on all of the evidence presented, the City of Huntington Beach finds that the benefits of the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach (as described above) outweigh the adverse short-term air quality impacts associated with the construction of project and the possible indirect growth inducing impacts of the project outside of Orange County (as described in Section 5.0 of this Statement of Findings of Facts). ri+„„t Huntington Beach August, 2010 Item 50 - Page 112 Pa -364 82 -365- Item 5. - Page 113 Zoning Compliance: The seawater desalination project is located in the PS-O-CZ (Public-Semipublic— Oil Production Overlay— Coastal Zone Overlay) zoning district and complies with the requirements of that zone. The following is an updated zoning conformance matrix which compares the proposed project with the development standards of PS zoning district: e, y� C0QE koviS10 e: %;pROPO ED . l •Psi„i, ,,��." ,�-�.t.�" •: 3; �,''���, �,y4'� � �•' 4� � e . 214.08 Lot Area Min. 2 acres Min. 3 acres Lot Width Min. 100 ft. Over 100 ft. Setbacks Front Min. 10 ft. Parcel 1 - Min. 80 ft. (from Newland) Parcel 3 — Min. 80 ft. (front - north lot line) Parcels 2 and 4— existing complies. Side Min. 0 All four parcels comply Street Side Min. 10 ft. Min. 80 ft. Parcel 1 Rear Min. 0 All four parcels comply Building Height Max. 50 ft. Max. 35 ft. (from finished floor) Floor Area Ratio Zoning Max. 1.5 All four parcels comply General Plan None NA Site Landscaping Parcel 1 — Min. 6% (9,105 s.f.) Complies Parcel 3 — Min. 8% (30,122 s.f.) Parcels 2 and 4 — No less than existing parent parcel. Building Design Requires building offset along Project design recommended front and street side; Alternative for approval by the Design standards may be allowed for Review Board. unique structures subject to Design Review. 231.04.B Off-Street Parking - No min. — Based upon project 31 spaces (adequate for Number employees andguests) Other Min. 9 ft. by 19 ft. with 26 ft. Complies aisle Loading Area Three loading areas min. 20 ft. Complies by 14 ft. 230.78 Refuse Storage Required Complies 230.84 Dedication & Dedicate 12 ft. along Edison Complies Improvements Ave. frontage 230.88 Fences &Walls Screen wall required 8 ft. high wall with accent pilasters consistent with tapproved HBGS wall plan (tern 5. - Page 114 -366- -367- Item 5. - Page 115 LCJJ CHJCIVICIV I - VMFUMDLC � I40. 0' 148.93' -ram R=65.00' o L=65.90' EA SEMEN TS z EASEMENT RESERVED BY S.C.E. PER INST. 20010286988, O.R. Z �I ® I N89' 9 EASEMENT RESERVED BY S.C.E. PER INST. 20010286988, O.R. Q), j i DISTRIBUTION, AND TELECOMMUNICATION UTILITY CORRIDOR 2 'I20'2 S.C.E. PER INST. 20010286988, O.R. 333.23' N89'29'32"W 373.23' >ION, DISTRIBUTION, AND TELECOMMUNICATION UTILITY EASEMENT S.C.E. PER INST. 20010286988, O.R. i FUTURE OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION AND 'ATION EASEMENT RESERVED BY S.C.E. PER INST. 20010286988, Ln� MENT RESERVED BY S.C.E PER INST. 20010286988, O.R. T OF WAY DEDICATION PER INST. 79970652309, O.R. i 0L EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD / RICT PER BOOK 5190, PAGE 102, D.R. , FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR THE PURPOSE OF / CHARGE OF SEAWATER FOR COOLING PURPOSES PER DOCUMENT 9, RECORDED IN BOOK 3795, PAGE 535, O.R. A co U) Q o o _ cza c o A m m ATLANTIC AVE. VICTOR,, . ST. I NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE (BUtL'�JNG 55' X 32') \\ (LOADING;AREA 42' X.1b , ADMINISTCON BUILDING (100'x50') RAT \C.__.. S� ROAD 72"-BRI N ; STORM RAN / \I / \\ el 171 DUCT WATER RUMP/STATION ;TRICALEQUIPMENTr'(23'x35') N INFLUENT PUMP \ \ _. ;r // / -�� K � / )r TATI� `: ' � � S ON (28'x78' , r .91 7,.4 78 1 85__. 92 97 l 50 60 70 80 90 100 SECTION GRADING PROFILE EDISON AVENUE A VERT 1 "=5', HORIZ 1 "=5' - _ ..... ._.. _. _ ... .. _ _. _................... ._. _....... ....._.....__ 12' _. EXIST. ._ASPHALT. .P_TH_ ......... ..__. .. ........ _.._ _. ......... 22 2 .. . . LAND-SOAPING ....... WALL (8'-0") EXIST. CHAIN 1 .5 Q LINK FENCE 10000 ............................................ . ........... - .71 Zl 'NN'\ ....... ...... IN, NN, 41 -41 CK" iV LIDS HANDLING FACILITIES .. 4�1 ,b 7 >\ ADNN MIN18TRATIOWBUILDING 77 'S" I...AD P .CES s.. T30 WATER PUMP STATION, ?EAR 72,, BRINE l ST M D IN >\ 7— :z— vi� .ECTRICAL�,,, IPMENT INFLUENT < ................ 71, "a IDER PLANTED LANDSCAPE AREA 3ROUND COVER. IN FRONT OF OFFICE: 330 SF. 1\ND STREET AND SEE ENLARGED PLAN �NTING AREAS .. ..... .... .......- Tz" ,Y WALL X V -K j CONCRETE BERM 00, SECTION A-A EDISON AVENUE SCALE: 1 10' ,r Ir „ < CP < {} 77 <„ w. ate. <r r 5� s , - „ Q ,zg ?m ,, -"'. - - �',555,", M �g ,INK!" y. ,g n-- j V MV & . ............. .. ......... "T .............. MIM FOP MR ON �2 S 0 M �-R 4- ............. v. W, ............................^...... —-—----- ........... -—-------------- w 4 o n, N ................ MEW M. "s WRII P RPIVIII, kti Imi Amft a ........... F', A- L Lion N -;M g4jO W-g A mu M �P JQ RF",A Mi 7 7� IF . ..... sm "'J, AN, j�# MEM O" ad AF "M ate: "0 MR,r ml W, " A 07 .......... 36'-Y IB" T.O.FINIAL . .......... k 1-%l 0r%r Tth etev-.l -i C on 00 Q "',77 NAM ''K OR* mew" is Al'A 4 ....... rl 4- WA ,f x", xe W,4 A # > r IF Z U, k, M i ih A �u No, x. D sn F I LN �77 7—m 7 77 oia WY. A, 0,o fi Io VW 4,w V, OMI I m "Y om - 4 ""J -Az J �u A I T 2 V VI - TE l, M—lr 46 'o 1 0411, Qww-o, �J- 11 7 16,40, P-o- 41, "t w K Z `C d-I il-�wl Sri _rv, ; '10 I AM A, w Cw u Via„ w: t. A a—ow l 7777--�: 77-f-77) w 0 77 W, I P T I J ff A� �77 sue,77 -77� �77771 7— J* WALI ^cFSET ES EXTERIOR SCRI 1 'N 7 "NAM 6 to I la 01, T w N, Ak im Iva t IA;kz- wi LAI, 1 6, P11 P, U iL Nmw Af Ru T": M LL— ,ON TINT • i.,A. Al�l DOT AIX WON I 010-All 101 17, '6 M, 'A 711 le—M pr *0 ov- m/ jg�4111 Mll V. M,, wo, low :01 ............... .. ............, WWI. N I mmu M W"al Mil o >mw-- r 71 ww" "A .......... IF W MI", -0"3 7' MUM",' 'ixfi V .........* 0 -A 'W 4 Ir 2 -0" v '9 77-777 an A iE W, _v Ilk, V IRI M, ow T' sludge conveyor opening 's F.F. 12'-0" 1 L��� t ..........tt `71 wql="%Sl qebe-vration 54'-8" 7 T I I" All L 7, ELM- ism Lin We ova Alf I mo Q it t. toogy- "A N ---------- Wi ...... ..... Qe t. WIN, nit Mg, Nr kit. 'Ar F1 Fl LJ L FLOOR PLAN 1/1619 a4rs. 17 r. jr - --- 30, it .TO .............. • 7 77' tam 71T IN N-1-4 ........... .................................... y . aaS SLO U E I eN v1 I I uc,rn 49' r. ON` Elio" ................. �u V fg� I _ z , K Fg I- .,, < < < "��">�� '`;�:,•�,�,,, -``%G'"� �=$x`t<,.?� a�; -;l",a;t;•„ arc'� � I .,. ;�'��� J ,vim,..; '•'',n:...:.�i.:,:,i.='�'�-;^.^,nW€,,,," ' '. '`:�;. , >a. �y. < �r < 661, Fes£- , 4," k; ?s3• < E: s; . - ,, ,. .3;" F';;;„£r:: ,y�e';�.'�%;:,.;,--,rs� ,c<'� ,✓? y mod- � �� N�. -� .�� '.. '� � �. �..Xn....,., ry -, .. vI .n "-D4� <,. ,.< ... ..\r.':%"=`,,, 7•,;� nf- ; ��`Ayr. .','H3. {� ;`rp,'-. �.1==•., �•�`';'^tis„1.; �3,�: :i°<^Y1'r,3x ;.. ,.. „ �' a � .-"'rj'' a, " PRODUCT WATER" key nnt( STORAGE TANK 1. metal pa i 2. storefron� 3. metal roll 4. metal ma R rG .r h , - 5. steel can( CONC. sCo�__..._ y ___ ------ 6. finial _ _ mechanic --—--—---—-—-—-16- TER PUMP STATION RODUCT WATER TANK —PRODUCT-WATER-PUMP-STATION as E. rA z­ 9 l� Lo aC Fr Bo 2 electrical transformers 116 Aw •� :� r v a .. ;: :11;" FF 9'-3" :. :-FLUORIDE STOR G �aa CD .saga ���1;' 'f .na%:,�msn, . •.. fi�.,;c: iin. 1. ,:l4"; !� 't a. Q 1-00 /,� :i; '%ram" �: v��r .-'• AM M 0 .ECTRICAL EQUIPMENT key 1 7-777 1. metal p ctn rPf rn TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 2010 - 130 IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,COUNTY OF ORANGE,STATE OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL DESMiPnON ANTHONYC.CUOMO.PLS JOHNSONFRANI(&ASSOCIATES,INC. N AL alY a lAAfmla f1GaE E'OrABY 0 aM1aL aOra S I SO EASTHUNTERAVE., ANAHEIM.A 92907 (714)777-6877 OYfOMt(RAID A S1o1801 6/Mm 1?11Bt fm fawn-magi,gr�auiammY`�v mNrr �ra JULY,2010 aED aGXa OaA1R. € „,ES�O1J .J ASSESSORS PARlM1 Na ( -'•. -"�'-- . . .� .,;, ,'1 rwuar a mAE®a nE rauosN mAEAo<caxrr � < � w-faE-ww-fm-Aa ua-w-w �,0�' Ao xnmofoN agar IE1BN1aAS ffe P4�a rmaeaa EE1PoMml � F ° � ,�'` - € -- r i � �, -`-r�P-- � '_.••� Na B BIIOEHMER m fmn aAal aNEflfOlf arG EOO �' {p � � J E i j - - � _ (€ �onoNxNclw sea SUE . o ) - wfuowwsR�gasnrwr•Af�Ne Z `' ,�i _I. 61 .;t ,g- a€: z {S z LOT TABULAnON EENpIr YP<BS ANA a Waal 1 61at TIE A01611ENE W F^" .,, .` :: V J [� i S 3 W APB{SIEARRBIt IY IIw-aG1I1�IRI)!Aa6 Z ;�� gg $ � _ 'd'0..�•':✓�-T�F a � � - - O,` £ P�%w",# a®NEAP rKWAm P4/SNI AOGl �;\ n� MR AG� fa4RN m F4/ AaIJ g - ••-•- I �, ��`- /[T AIEA DnPfRJWIlFt OEOA:111a/NLIi _�+� �� ..� ;= •:' �) ;<_ 3 � (, ; -_ - fawxmrc/ur.ms r� o 'er ".a `j P ar.vre >sdlmmsx sas.ma •;� �" �g ''""d:"-� p � uiBY.VE-aram rt/aa sgmm) � $, � __ mcr oarw uborrr-:Laren rx/uR `� / ;�^"'��.�;�' z� €ta' -.�e -� �•-•,; r '��: ti N+anso NtArzAooiwa E''*'+� Bfomsn eNwwrfeAranw -a, 1� %K .. � � --3"¢� -_ ---c Nomm wvaE rAN1RRr i j z,,,' ,z �c l :€ i t.i�:n ., Pxa+r�BoemcY Aeasa ua�r "�' F, I �'2. 'S'§-: --✓:�'.. !• '- / �� b , 0 L ^<,�,n'I RIa�SD ALOE FA9OR l �.--" _ "�- tit �•' s IF r�h'�"/'t mmfaa'�z"'•'Yi`'a�" r: �1� l �' Q `'•«h �'�' ,•;�`. ,, - �...°"-�''`,�.,.. (mom ;, UN-PLOTTED EASEMENTS / � `z/„ ��°""i, � om=ora xrn�ewc nciur wr Non®fefeor Na m u recr / %"..�. '-,= .. RNi 11EY AIE B11Q N.fIfQI N REIaE M IM T>1 GMOI S / I/ :i '�" tEEmlm FRaI RLgO NfaY1 a DFY aD MOl AaFCI ilE NB.Rcr NEOEn1r.lErAa as NE axAwR PAR PW. i // ..,, u Bel m E1YPSioac a aarENw�r nal.m q aBc Etfs Nlq SEWEN `\`' IIBaE DBdARI G Abt®NE B.®AA2 611E LA10 Pat®! �:' •°`..� �`� n�'fflr�'i NN e�aor�raamrA�a aQ mNfo a n wiE ea` i ��,,��.. �IE41NAa11¢All.Bala 6 wY FAmERIa AlD gIAmAEB M J `v/ MOPOA!lgHNlElt `�Ma1OEE4T r }I FII"JI maapr RW6'fD.wa 3 1vn,N aoa rW1.PAa m v 6FC�t IELVLt ® NEAEHD AOZ6 EAmdf-aC Cf DL BOf1 m mL iLSF tORIiL m!a ErEfafa/NTNE a[M .WIBar a iM AID MO NNe MalB Rlt I®lltlaa6 N n¢aR B2YIBfD MBIBI N 9a0f 20�,r in NB aCR@R 1V >m tap s0 PRJ64D AO:ESE FA I-D•�[E N.iNN M 9naf.114 PAa f14 W M?allaK B2aalt — —_ ® PAaN@D NEAIE FAOUIY g41OIt BOAIaeNAO/t a/AOaSE Nita W 11F 14IMY AW1NRt m RAB 1N6T-IN1lM Aa M PA610 fASat INaEY-19P AE OOaAE16 ® PBiOED NON[//E g4lBPt-ENNIBF BOAT f�N fNNX aBgPAa Am�a�Pr�11t B7La�NW a LLfaal m C 0 rxams lx uafoPt-a cE TBaq PRO1B06 tAM�F�PER nE 00aAB�+r IEmem a r4 4 � G k ® PALI6�Bwt a'wr oEnaEAaN-mmn mni-rr ra rPs AE wawtw s aYmAE NAame ® IEIOI®BRIt a wr emr Aa-r►n• ualEBls mrxwrs xB cvaAoa Nwrtm w AE mvnoN 11 Al urAwaE tmnf coN.vlr m AEa IANIErOIBI 1.A.4 IEOaWfD O PRaY@D Bon s wr RNAAa-eaaaN SIIEEi acP9tY i1AAUNaIO fur P soW At NSgA¢1t Nf aWamN�s.vW lm w AE OMAOIt NAOIBm AEIAIARY M BB4 Aa NSMApt Ife 0 l�BWt�'.r AOfts!G�It IDWOOm-A aDiM v QPaAt/EOAWS ® noasn Aam umdr FLOW ZONE DESIGNAnON O NeanrEn Aran gaffoB-.su� u aarlmEnr Brave a u mN Ram f aAUAz RAa rAP Ile amOEOatTy B!19D®®13 R1a1 M 9BEICt IIOrrNA SG Rlal]im ACQEa flttmlt-YABANL RBIRRIY B OF9aMim Aa lm BIIN ROOD 3AE'lr} MAIEmNEASUffiMAB 16 a24'MM1LL at111R?BaCR.YES 61l AIIALH alAlla BCm Na AIERAa NPf16 6ltaf THEN 1 fr10 H9ML Ll41OIt I7lmf1ED w e^e PEN NSL AWOIDIifq OR �a� ��1B�f �IIAO`�P � � al(IOI LVR G I IE>BNFD w SGL TER Nf1.YBfOaiw OR ® 1pd�awA ®mamaERa�.rrvl uanr rBmq SURVEYORS STATEMENT WwBvwmoA cBAmlrnt ArW tnaf=rarwRa I/ILfI umelt no 1lEP 6a IfAOE T a w ErIAA w OEBAiat AOF i ® AFSaED n aec TER Nn:zoWwrtNea aR NABNAna w rA,EEB maN rNW AloPnw rrnc BNwBIz Exam AIN rrTnAE o1mEAo ArN lABwwaAB 06A9Aal AM m1vAxY PmavuNr nvc Boron Gfm ANE za aorq AfECBAn.G1fa ufawr lamEm x ace PER EBc IamrA ueINR osA.afAem nragwr NPmuna WfouN JP y, ti Y = f A ANapt EAmEw rR4F�w aLL 10 NSf.aOWaWNO6 aR �* ® A'Ba BBR tt wY NKEA(N Pat Nn:1MOOR.O.pR ti�C aA)W �o flY.AK A aWf ® PI1YD CalIR1 G41mrI N FAWM 611E flP.IMF OOIMM1 ROOD AO NyN OOrfA1 m'mP Pa a0at Wm PAa IIB.OR FA4lEE1 N FAWr 6lamEPN I:.11Aa11A fSO11 iq AE RAIR¢R a971MZ 0 SEAMIER�4 I.12 MPT SJ R1P OpaApl item 5. - Page 136 -388- REV 2010-08-'° :..n ^x'- a '(..di-k .--'�;�- :t,c �<.< ,g;.��..f�.i° .,.y, •'�k"",_=; r r£�"s.r�•i: �-• ,ems �:..fr f,..t -^{' a x#• Y»di' ' 1.,4 e M , • 3 r^= ■' ,01L�4 n[t ^n f xd a g rs t{ ` x ,:.- :,. .,r ■ x x�"!ywt.,n e 5 .<«r:• „x,<.. _ w•�. � -..", .ti=*�.Z,..,. �- �T� �' � r- .<�"•#M .�,. ,. ,y,.. - �w'>:„ < -� .,x. .N` �:. :i1° ,gig. :. � „k•«:�;; :�' �> '� z --,+7- rzn �I t�„,' e�. i�b a �:� , , � � n,• ; - ,.�:• �' „ < „Eh � i , sic x.k x� <rs+.iia, � �a :�,. E 4. F •� ''� a �� I,rl{I`i :�" ��h'�.c��� i! r ,1�'- .�s t._ �,�*� - AA '-a� � R`,: i; � a ,Y �.p. .�".,,"� ��O<, ,d�ie's xsa' •:��```�'"� "I�<� � -` e ^�.•,� �: ;:'f e�i,< 0ty: ,,::�...�' .B �''"� •zts� !j!�pCp' �..:�,��,`�' t{��� .?;fir sa .'�1<��Rb FG-- F 5�`a F . ,�,owm{, ', �..,''� :., ""` ,• .9 ,r .�:s-- s< % `4t xs �� .n % � ,ep '�v-"'. � =3��..; �a�;?'„ .a' :',F< .•`,".a ,4;3 �.rL.w:*rya 4•:. � v �$(:;;.,>\`4 '.,'ieca es", ;:'«".tid��taa+ia'�.; �� Z _; �ix �, .� ...rt ��t � �� x kR y a � zte�" ..`•„ °'�,x" j f q�:q, 1tL'r x t _ 6. :,si«„� :i ("z•, ,.,E .K,3 �+;�t „w, 6 s'"..v},.-=, r -��,f,"�94. `� �� t���s"at _ ,� �_ �5�"`-,:a• j �.,a.,-_. _.< xt 1•a�': � <.. �,"' ,rv';:'r,,.>„;..tEr ,ti ,.•_.:,1� � _<.• �^ R$I ''. <x - �iR E° '' ,'D .1 •%'Y re$ u t ""„��•t v " t .. t ",✓7f+.' ..:, . , m ., , _, t n, iA!8 Sp4�, is aR-�i rkt � , 1r..a..,+°, .f s,. ... x�". �.� ... : a k', £ `}LPS, -.b ,a i.�.. ,� �•f Sa c +� •, -r: :. :« ..� x fue.,M.� <..., ,.at._ ^s,mG,,, °`u „±„-c „ 't!' .. � ,•^' }R, ._,::,. ��,,� �` � ^? Is d+„xM, '<IC a r. � a � ��. ;<. ....s ,k,", >:. ,: � r,:,.. ., <:+� �.� !' .�: 41f Y' �.e•;r 4':< s x!Fy�r�a. w{.`� po,.,, C�, ^-^.,Y� �v?t ,-<. � ,:. .t' .,w, ., -..� �� a --. ... -.. :.d• � '�.... d�,y s�2.�i;. :.. a. :.<,:, Iqz' ..�.�s Y'u. a f d 5:: '#x ' , ,,i „ c :,.. ,x.,: ,r.: !�. , ��az., ..3�c ,. .4... ....>.-.,.•, .,. :, i,•'�F. #,1. s7d w.we-' �„�„, d}� „i,�.:+. � .�.� , �'.�"e: ,� �. ,. � .:- #`��a� - _..>: � •aq� t ::, 't�..-.:. ..-.. I..«_ _ � .. :.:�'...,;�f � �ii"y4�,< P d!. �,.- 4 -`#;: 9, �y-"'� � ^�:i" -, 'y' - +..� -. ar .�, "'„{'"' :� ,_. .,£� aID�' ., -: ;..., <, :,. _-s���:: ^`'art ss.[9i9i�:��•,,,F+"ter.. ..a.. ,�,` �'a::�� .,. { � '�fr "'. ..; -. ... -< .y:�: -". ... •'-' ice:- .�, �'� :. rr. . .:x<r i ',,... ,� a�� ,rxf: .�<4-�^� "r1.��, .a ,. ,... .�Ir r: ,.,� ,- .. ,:....•p�Cpp 5 x. -, ... ...,..a. 1i!"'• <.*a.. ,... ,. .. �'t ,... .-..«dA: mr"k. ,: * ,s.-. �4 'a� ..�4... '} i�a�<. .o rE n� _ , "- t - s•....t;d=+ ,•. <. ;y„. w �9� i '�"� $«,{ r xr� y i'>:,��� .r; } �'. mM�"q{. . (w 2, w, ..,.� •, N4.. ,i r„» F :�A.. .Y. ::.; +�$ ,. .,.n -:.,c« kl. :e, A "Y=. �<:; ;.;�, 'Y"... z, �:� Ht �:.� dk �,r f. � � ;s".`.� �`�'�+� ���r. ,,.�;`.a� ".=•r51 '.r�. {p,'�_� x<ey..,.f .-, x:. <. 4 K ., a�.�$^, .:.. *i�- 4.n... `.:,`,, r'-' •PC.' .f .a..« �• ..�,• F',.. «.,L'Y..- ;% , x« ', , "L"'",, .., d .,. - .:5•. M , Lx,:..:•wF,r}i :�• ; A .S',:rF^ Ali �.0 •-� , ,, -�. .. _:,S�* _. ;. , r�*�iLl+ i��ice•r, Pt ,�a ,�x � .I ,s FS �^� t •4 f �r ... ,,,; ��� +:..�`��. 'sss►, 'S r;.." ;CE - SY`a,r, , �.. d _>•;� -'�" - �` a,ha ` �;Ir' a :kf±,r: �.. '-�:: �# _.. ..s^v„ „,<«t�p,,.. .tS. �, e. , ,� : ...N+l,.;=�y ,± . �» ;; � ,��. ,g k '°-, _ r! �•��,y� ,t' ,' ,ar -� a�' "a :*� ate- :t :i"-=•.: .o � �`. .i ate.., ,�' :< •,:. ,'' � r -=--�r.�""s;u•.u.a;,,, 7. t ��aJ��"`"< yy;,�.:: da � •{:?� ^rs w � i.�'Rw �3 i� „pa _ �a;.ems � - .-,1S' Y•. -:,'� f s T`ba Rai$f' �.7 �➢r, � .5.. :^§ .& ;J a v'k, .� `'n ';b;. 17 ^sa '�,.. v.�-r• `ix"d€.u �,�r, � � �° 1 {:�ti+• ,'$G.,+ , ,L•, t ,3" e 4 Ha*':' 22 -• i. .� ,.fir:.. -15 ei 3 , Y`.e a' '( ,r. ?' eW'-.� :� ,•'�" L�i °*t+t,"k'^ .�.t.Er.. 'tsx,*x ; gus:... •ah. xr,�L< -<r7 'x L;:, f �:r.Y P � ra-' y;•. ;I e 1 •�,: h, �� ..A.�, 4:,rya < Pr; r z �p�" � �� *. r x,'�, � �,D,>, •die' it ��''�ra: -� �,&a$i, ,.»..,,.,rah„:, aa� t. 4 _�«};:.,3 s �Z -J}` ',�„ ':L i .:.a .�� rnt^_a£ � - ,e�! :.#i. ,A:: 3•aT i;^ ,�' 4d, r,i' }; 4'h i' .«N. Aar �'t .d. •.E 4� �t i,.f bp'�a '�;(a. r r$" '°; u:. , '!�" ;. � ado»„., ws. ,„x _.: .,. ii `,�.».., � ":z. �'x. -+-.e t.i m.ITI,.�x{, •€�<.,5 7 �r :ef�x�; ..�.,..r¢+[.-#;-, ., 4?. � r„�;.. _ ,.!>r r'•a,- '.ra � ....Ewa � • •± j w. '�c�- F v ,zkx: ':'a �' c..a�.H:;,t`£''^-�a��' `�" .�' ''`n' x S xi;": ..m.-' ', ..�,.. .. � �,;��� -• .._ _. as ram,, .. ,:,;- ,.,,�. r« ..! ' `�G?i��i.i.3 C�� �� :Aa;��,r�'a '/ .. .. � � ,*sg^ o �� » �!y, � "�pi;t�� � e � ,� � � ,•^m..,. � .� ,� a �.-£ C:bpi i � a,, v .� •' , <, , ,{ w ... -.. 'i3x.t '�-'x- ,a ,rk t:•� '•„ ., �� ,c ,pr,- 1 _ {: 'w ,�f r;° • 9 (l. ? ±a �1ryf' '�A cu 'e<� '<:,' s xt" ' r ..,, �t=Y � � d •€ < x „$. .>� :r eta' .� ,'_� '°'� _ r. t ry :� :. ,^ ,. ,. ,k ��yi. : +tnv,�� yg�• x,A ��i. — �� �= ^A�2 .Y !.s� sa: caa,:r::5 _+:� �a. x � ;: .., i o,�,.K'�a2<., i < aar° -f'4'3b'�t g ,:'P'z;•. ;.YAK{ � ,�xb�ry°�`r"�,, ,y;"`�. `1 d'�'.►-` "...i.<. l q 'x-.�., u,'. ^ S _.- to: -.. kn-+u ,; .•. y;.a_q ,r � a � ��{av ^kx.. � ,t r c^. 'a#t , e ice,z.y .Zz 1 < ��' :��,.Y' .^�. a:, ;N, a+ 4 �; ((, w' i:� ,�.rt>r�7k a,.�'•�. 1y. ,.%?S '�sk, �, _ -. a ..A,._ '.,,�.,. � .f;}t•. .:rxw ;'' �. .�,: �'- � ' Ins ...�. ..,.�-- � r$' �.• as r f• st �°. �.�m`z.� (:.- g •�;. ,"Y-,x:. 4 r '���Jy +�s'' -i,: to N '2.t^� ° x,� ,� � 4' ,✓ °'� f d ,x.,.e' '�:35'i y, .}'max'. t��•, 4r+. -' •'_: �.^:1. e , ', ,¢j' .,M}MxA,vfbN,..,3 - .'!. ,.. C.. ..... �-„e�lS w'. .}„ :t�k�!m iiiP, �', -f`"..r� z� 4 a��:H b e' a<` «�- ,?. :5 � ` `A e 4.{{a� _.x.>�.4,�45", ^� ;�.3" ,•t•a,. x 6<-% 4. A %D 9i }}�� /"• u�i;'.✓ ark �. s.�. .r•.'i.; s*. ' ':z' 'sue� a< '�1 C "' -��. :•'' � �@ #� r��Y , a Ti ,•air;. � � ' < s�« ,z� I y.,y d�xz � ,�?. +'•�� � I >r � �;�u .� 21,E�. ; � „�� ,.z.. y.'4 .�:.... •✓/iM.3 • ,._: ,..' •.. y:,k h. �,.� 'w , _:, q. '. ..d vx.�� � � 3'S°` °'`a4, ,:2jF <?:R' A,.♦ ,' d o. �T • n .r 'L x. ws wry«'= :x#. -� f... r_ �z t..`�'. e ,a', �.,, ,>�,.` •^�. v r. �t r .;� yy� tt<< .ra+�xrvsrlGuw *i<"k�+■« f�-=°.-, :t.-, a k � ,i4",.- 'y, J^ti,� �'a `h ,.";, '�.: �w�,'-•h" .. ,... 4 �.• ..;:k�$ax,�,.<5: ,.:..:., "[ ;:<,.; �•-- 'x ".�>� :"a'. °�gfiti•, ,.>y`y�"Q � ,_a F +k � i iP +'� •x l-� ear,., ��� ,:.J;�- P1f.A-ai[t" '� �,E � - ,pr�42q<� ^�; � M� ���'". %, 4,4: ,�,< ,rm ', t. ,a°., ` ,x<..;, •« ._°[ ,.m "t PHI t%,. < 1 . 4,• rx !s `F� x ..t T ;;¢„. � ,•,�*. `�.'� .�"^ "} ��d n ';rp,,,�'C'r.. z,. �a ''w<�t�'� ,,y', 7 „, e� ,:§ i ,,,1,a,. ' raw •,;'i? ,.i€,, }c �r'"°xe• ,::'L*r�"„ `.'. ,ti '�'� !' "��' a�, at �." s>a. �� �'ri y. °s a,�p � . . � . ��� ,, I� :•`� F t'„ � c 3 "� i' ,��� � A- �f.< ,3r s�- ¢ g z- v''stl. �" ,� - � `< <,z E t� $.-s cg„ � a fi NeX � a ,-� ;:.�., ;,.- .. �" , �°n .:a*.! - � �.•.' . : t' .��p'� .. °�f'' Y +:1r6 � ;� '�<.Y �'Q #,, ;- s�"x�,"+�,�nx- � '.,:- :w.'_r +ir':,a ca — `y��5gWE�xa dFrt��. 9 ,l„ ,:,. ,'�t,.'..4fA, �7�(�F. , + ,. ! �l"• :rI ,1., ,:•r -, .':_ '�'".. : Yr ( ;'�.♦ �5�'A ':'fiba"F fib: Ei� �kr�;,tM1a' a ( 1 , �a„',t• .;.>��. it , .� 1 �' ,). � ,.,� _'€` ,,� � mr: .R -t t y.: �,s ,R- �•� :r" ,r:r�ai{:;:a „y-;,;.- ;,; - .......•G j -.,.;.,-�.r ,,�,. ,.:.�. ».v.;'d:h :.ea ,._ --, tr !:. � "`. ��•- 4 Wit'm a��`�-.='_. F,:. �,,,.,�s. r v.{ ,,::.� ,. w< ,;b...,, ,, ak E.. �(!ax, ,. *.q ,xa - €"`� � !' 3„••� .b��-.,te�'t. &�,�+,' F;'-. �<A<+..� 63 :,<„"�r. p� i ,.���, 1i4..'- � •��r .Si;z .r � �'" �' ma :a:fi"r �. ' is�:cv.. , , , t,..... :..e.I ,: , m.3 '$.. .,f a... .. .';�:.. ,�� §' ,<., <,. •% d':. <1G a;: .� +,,. ra>d• :..„. x';. ,.. .7 ,. , :«r.. ,.:"'t-., ,_• ':; w,»,,,,:r,:.r _._.. ,;..-,--,. ,_<, �,. .. ��g@�jp _ q t1 asar: s»�k .k�l+. a'•i ?�•a,T��,�>,.�rr �,:k;�;..:;t k�a cxRY ,, y -..��. ,:.„-,-• ;dd,' <� .a, ., .: � ,: riry" � :Xl�- ':: .�i„ ^��^,-. �'� :Tx%a. .. _. v` ....,,- 4go,,.`., ..... .: 4e tG,�!�'3a,:" f `,• a`S:'` , �,.�.. ,..-- 7..:.. .._ ,.. e Yer . i l g�€ ^.�..,,L='- �, rc... ' ,•-�gYi'�yr +,��� ,� �- y„ ._ � ,�1,A Efs rR „<,>ru,at 1 I ra. - � ;er �y - :par .., -,- •�.���;k.>as.,*,' , 7 a��.u.Yr � .i', .�.!i ,tiS�b"' ;9- $U:'.,_. �Rs .t�, f... R p� w✓N :5. - �A trier; t' n! l,r.i Y' �� : < 'A:N'brlM`3�N �` .F�', ,<.� "s ,� �' � � >d• �'rr;` a : a , rr r aa. � x vi r�a"•rn"''`` .,a`- ,.t" ':o,b1 �? r��4 ,w 4.., , �� •fri r N .� -, .: '' .,, D ,.� ..,, ": �',, - ,. , ", > r' v,- ..� ,7� .Y:.y "1 .ar,a.�'-^ v,�. �S''•eGtw,� '��;'.e, i"{xr _ ... � ,e '.x�'.' .," ..q.y _,'* �.' /�' ^F<aRp ;.ate•'.-r.•r' �z�: fir:,. ,,` _:-Fran •'.-:r",r _. -:..» ,:-v:„: - .. ",,:� •�-. , .Fpz. iD• .. ,- ._.-,�®, ,a �N '�,, xA x, e s... s. .;, �� � +v.•r<� i•, R3 -� AR ae 53x 6df. M .: 'Q'aev:�µ:.xtx.TSn' .y!y��.+.+^4.w... __,._'. ..:. >.n. �. p4' ... i:: :,»„.,.. ^ � �<�5p, » �•� 6l�ito.•�Wi'�:Yyy{ �.I}l��, '�� �. ' t 91r. 'V.<! a :f:' , P,a. : } � _ ..,.. ^i.. w' 1�„ .I,. w2( i'^+ �'Cb - I.ft P .FS�• >�, .a. rr •�• ���t�'.., r k >v:� �� w' ONE' ; .t:x:%° �, r -°•r',`-fir R:G: «•x r �. ,r<��,_ 't,5`. ''' �� �� r,- z eu v< ti " .. P"u.,, m e. .:; '° y'". �a ��.' **���+,,� ,-. ....• .� p V.�� ''her-f� md' '. ,}w .s ,�->. � v "' d`t'Pr� (, r'y`f:• �%' ,� v� �� r�` l.s'oa#��.,.'�! ""?i; .r '•:3. ."k�1'. »,,.tsr'. »{*_ ;: .mn:. , '� �4 Y-,�•� " �! °` I .�e � )�:Y 1 -s N.,t ,y p".rq. �A'�',. #t sL. 6�' !;K u�.. ,'p.� r � � �;y r.M:ac���'+'�Nr•%� ' > ..,,.,.' ,• ',W 'r „ l , � , , � �FA� ?!� -� , O� :w.j!. _:� � : S%, 5_`Tn Nyr,^''.-. a ...F=l��R�el � �� 4 .:_!�I at3�%`.. '+--3k�.� -y. ' t � q,: : `� � ✓j�17 t''4'S rr', 4�'y(.,{'�'- '��'s � aR, ;5'=�,^ ap.v.. mir e .. 1� � 9 .�, "t' S' dti�( . = ��` �r.: , r :'.,- .� _ �F - *.' '��se� �,E c s►,��, .�auA � 5+�, -r.� fi �. � ,,.'�t w ,.,.t#" � ,1 Pf po �.,_.! ,.rd ,� •' �. I r�i.. 'aver' ��' 4aw�. �z,, I}��,<. ,�2.'�4D3u . ',- i "f c,✓ ,: � , '' � s, w� y ' YM., phis AM:5r�°. ! 6 . „ �: .. ,, � :a �, " ":�. .�' -. ao,�r9'_�ia .:.:. � e;0.y «-"�^�',�s'�•N.':k' ��`< fi 'T*A 4�w•;s.*a'4:�`,f� ' ��5r��a��# ���-max g a,n . �. � a �`s �^„ ,d#. ��i,44-> ,�#, �. "�.r..`s�.:, r �..Jai"+ � � �,� 1» r�,Z` ?- 'c,; .��- '�T's{"d� �'""Y �t?.. '^,1;`�' �"' - s 3�" ,�,r s:�.�,}' R•$ � r�;€',�, .'.� ,.w�yp+"'•ra,;• x a +;"... ' -'... -�;�� ..- ,,a to l: ,.,,:ss 'h%:;. .• �'.,.: ,.F � y x.."F:* „N<<a-` ,e� `?�':R4, '.ice"�.d �.+;:o�:. '2;`'a'-r,. e- :L7 •i >.,.:-r,."�,_ � :., -'.t:r, � r'a �-.:, -.., ;: ( ,. :.; - �, .- ,^n,r tY� s�- f±:"•. '.�`+"'# i,.,,�5. ..:�. x,�. ,� ,� @ �f.fi*;�3-`°."Y2: �r±�. 1.:.sr,.+'""aro• .r „��-���5".x r e.. � V�'aIr �` e i a, x..t, ..x.,.>.. ..•..,. .x :_. , "'�E4 7, v a . Y:'* ,.a-. ,� b�, ry, ,. ,.�"„x zFs :.:r+,y! ...,.,�'.. -t�:R&'= KS..a .., : � '" '.r, r xst�,z.?ax �•.,.. :„:.} _:• , �> �,3:�; 4R...r�l �.x� .:per^. fi;,rr•,-..r„ ,...., t�i�-Y .,.. ..� § ,s<.< ^s- ..<.. ., - -,.:, ..:.i� r 'e`.`M1e -y,e i:aa. 4"' .:t« ?•,ten' :s,� ...yes a. ';i�,�iiR -s, .. '�... �s. �``,1 K..eP..,ar` -' .® "� k.,-�, `r�,s• :�.•_a,�, �?. '•'. �R..r ia'C '`�v wit :-ft.... t..Y >e ,�C- , ;?x6.• r:.; ; >:� a r s .Nz�:.r „'3i'?#... a,s..... '"xlp �. ,..z '.4 ,>,,.,;,2- Rs ..,+, t':a� .oy��,,a�a�� ;`R� }�,*��' >�x 'fS✓.. ag.� .� ') 5.,., ,:, 'S:. "_ ,{' &; .„,'�. ,,. a"ir,. �� .,. :r,,,E+`u+,.',._, -• :. RC.,. �:i?':w h �;:�.+,,p.,�, i.. r�� _�.._,:� pr_ �L. �t - ,.,.:,,. ,, �,t ;,,:. ,.;, .. " ,. .r,,, 3i., "� �:.'.,�a::-.:rt-"tFx4, � :; �'. ar+:t$'i _ Tk","�'t£gx;�.cnw .g" f =1 �a i y ,n.,.:.x..,_ "+, •�*�,'::r.. ,y M -. ..e...�„.. t -a'? „,r"f•1"..xa,, "� ,,,:;, ,t,;,. xt� =� _ � - ' -t(_ 5t'sr: yt9 ...x !�! ,, �".. ,,.yr, ,: .��. •,. � t s" ,f,,.,, - ,,.r ,.;.;t°EaR,Ul.x :: I. ..... ,�:r n L� .:`_ � ^5<r".. 's�?.,-.. 2 W`+ �., ,, ^..;:.;- ;,. y,. . , ,,; :z :» ;efi '•.: y s.a,<: r .:,,..4�,. �. �4f�e�,o�.�.«.'�"tt-rci+ 5 T•y�m""r�c�,':fie.,�� „i'Ef�� ����,,v .:;,r"•�`n �It::,...��^9.'',.ti ., n ,g_ ... , � ...,.-+., -,. :,^." :,.�l 1 -,T�: >..1Rt.g.' 't•L-' -- � r� - _.�.,, ,..." ,. .� D � �^. ,,. .. ,�. ,_:Js _ ,. � .,>,., v a "�'6. X.n.` �..' " ' :;.. ,:#:�" � =^�tr r m,. �">r� �,3^��3f++x'- �`�+.cNS:'F,-.g.;, •r.`.. ��. �. ,o.,1,tip � ,.,.�l!,!4'a y "^,. K� %�. .,r r .�"•"`_"#�.3.:11��: - .,�, .��. ,.%- ,u s <, c , 0: ./».. 8;,.(lltabY �.+.:C a'Y�".. is Ls$,`3 ^p.,' y Y .•�"iw;1: s/F a „ ..�«,. D ,.. .:, `�. .r .,.T..r: •�-,,A :: r (. ..Diu^=1 tG� _ � •a'!n.',f a.�';-', ��"•:.. {' ♦ .'�. � rK. ,��1�,� "`$ ,....T.r 4#1.�, dL'o .� ,k • ,..',: fA '�:.a ,,...._ 't�ram;' .v:�,. 6'r,,�r ... _:_...,_ 'a� ,~t. �a#n.e^��?ac ".a: r = ....n���R .tf r ��9 :a.*,r .,,F •..:.s. <.. ;,, ,, ,..:�, •.y.�"�.,,;, ;flail ,_,.F,..,, �T, ., c � �..." r �'!,<1 R ,vim „�i T , •-.:.r,, �-.x. Yw sr :lY�.x'_. va � � �:u ,; ., �q '�' �', rn,, id.: � w ., r'"' ,�. •r. .�,,.,�, >"�rs'aasa ,iFs! 7., �+�"'< yy '4i ,.i y<, . OWL, Ng .,,,�. i`'m",t�." 3':.' 'A: i!t, - d��3six�' rPp .?Q6'�'. .,: ..:u n. , r,:..,:.. >. _1!„. ., '+�P''r ,^_. ,, _rt•,. ,.� .: `"i �..._ :" :'';rrwi:a.'' :. a#,:: � �, :... .,£� :�.. .��.al rc"ia ,; s <..,,•..aq��� �,<, .,, a �x,.; �"k..n :'�••�•a , •" :lx �. ...^,�„,,,. .: ,�: ,,, +..a�,:; ...,,..{ :It•.. ..,.;. ,.,e.5g'N�,.8+a,.!....,Ita, ,�r ;.,a'e:. �(. �y+'w r.z--` 9r ;�E , an�a ,'� "� `� lip. , a_.>!(j� , f� �-�•.,, �-„.. —_.,.,r._,.«... ',- .vw,r n�".,�....�,S,:.�r--� ,,,.::%- x..:.i-•`'�edk. -1;,aal�s. i�?�i mxl. ,r3a +€•�a•;a-,�'_+�:-" , ,t� �( P �`�!'-c�' 1 ,a. -.rarul'2 � .!r ';n,.a+e+:,l;, a-,4°�.,:k^t=�••C�ir9 ��1 ••+�„c G+.#".r F•i :i4„T4'. ,, +" F,3w 2}"' =`�'�r,'`3"", � j, a Sr. , ��Fi .. �� ;,o: .. «.PI 4•fi � y � ,.I I •��c .{,.y..k%. 'ilx '.b.�a�i�'n _ -,.;",.x 1$3 ks >@A �i' IWP,':T�R?" 1 • ff,3y. '�"" : �€. ..t�'� u, .�� aW_i', a• K%"� .., � _iz.ci "� :.,fi' �i.... .-_� :�;� :•. � #t";,.:.,•,.�.___l ,., < 1rp. ,:..�.: 1'sG.. =:•,��+�" a�,�+ -• �R t"s<., ��R �;'s 3�vs, • ra t^rt, ,,�1 �J �v4: � . .,�° t I# '� I'x..>i. 4,�.I -„J: r 'w. �:sE .,^.7.u$ea°s4a' „�5>+ r =''f�`a r t..s� • �¢ �":a �" ;.,>�w�s r?'. ..,;.I" a �;i�:r .` =': ::,�vi. �` �,,# e� n�<r� '�s"ar`�,. � -'• „r±s� 0 5�"_�°'�'�— .nr ,.,.. .. di :� '.. '-Tw3+•.'x, - .s. .d, -:.;::s: , n•:. �`.,,.. p� k1 :�ae ,?�„ - a„r>t*"' dy ?'O ^';.� -2`re' y. ....,:3. >.:.,..", y<...:-:� ;a•�,�.` r e. ,. .: ,,. :. .`3 a .;.,< ,,.,-.:.': ,...... � � z tl <`,7 tt! ,;•,].. D. p .},T,y. g ',+x ,d:... Y:y.p..TtL'<;tt� r N� 'Ej � * ,. ,.4;ma P.+r.. :. '> ;�'r<=,l, w;�. ,,'_t<:e v r.". , ,. �, � � •.. , ., <;::,.... y,��:'.t. .. - D sue•+ - !> ,..<,y ..'� �." ...,.•.,>. +� n. rrz-� .._: ,r,..:<.. w.... am"_ .: �''. ;;, .a d. -. q «- :� - � '€,R�' swsn6� T,: _ „f;�„•�,�,�„; :..,..,':�'•..,«',t.aaa�.:..-.-:<Fs�r'}v's-� ..'#.""ti.•t'+"�..'�i e.x':-a•:..•a,�,r'a�"`: .�'�?�.:��•v..'5�.....�;,,:.,uk..e-m.i z-.'.3,",�<.;,�-.k�,w,?K'..,..�.,.»t'e.a wax�.-u. •.�� ��e°w• -:�.;�je—r ,a r> . :a- •. sk �. F emgi x ,.,. ,�...� s ,�. :.�„€ .,._,,r.}.�� ;.„.i -t-� z ::>;:. � '�':'� > s� .,�*`�. r�k,�s _ "u""�'r �"�7s r� '�� ,aa r,•,. 3°> "ra rr. >. az ,., � , - wt, �r:l,� .,,a.y,.� .- . `��=r�: - .�.�� � >-�-v .5t. ;�r.,, }xj:� r,�€� �n tr�' "�"<lerr t•�-r T' ,.,:a• ,......, ,,.� ..e < ,. », s ,3 ;.et... 'f '. � f r':tt, i . �."#'._....._±av„#'4'� ^...;�{5, /l' -1 :%a_:,.e s,4.�,t"-v F �.H :��r�8_ �" ,:.., �`�' .,1.. .r''a�'u�. .. .,�'., � .;, : c,.,. ,.. .> .ueai•'�,. r. ., ,„„„. tu:Y '"}'fir FS^, C.�5}�' 's4 s"-IK;�•4 �a;:�yy. •g?� it�>< a-..�.er,+ -I'' 4.kA"'" o'r�.�:;...'Qt'w, ,x�a .< d- .e„<- - '�'•' ESS4 a.,k Y a:'r'4 ..q: eh .�R',. •�=saaa��s Rat,fi.�'a.� bT�'>r,.. 'btn. ,� t �{!'.` � i".� �,a s �.. .�,<.,rr .^. Y, .. sx-,k `:. .i •;. •. .,'.. a�.,.,,. a,A��i< "ae. .��',�` � r, ,.k p ,.,sgs� pa'x".Pr x a �� `%4,.s. �a" ` 4� '.�"t �` -,I � � ,gip` y{.,ys[+" .� s 'k'xj �"" ��r„�k4x-.. � �. �,&•'�:}�''qk xu":°�,.�" k }.,.. 'U�s .�'c +�` •a.. 3<F..� vr, �; r.>,Yyn >"� xrn "+�,<,a"'^"i, �° �k��aa ':'f..e`•a�SraF.9=`�i.�`=�3x:-, ����.`�,'a' iE°.,.; a'w'`•. '" ..:„"�,t �,=K�3 q"� 1" .�`. fir,. ,� .�. _ ,.•ra'.�'# ..✓..�. .�� �.=<:a.>+.��" ���iY:¢ .s3`,'# { .N 'c.. ."'a�: ATTAC H M E N T #5 -391- Item S. - Page 139 IVA IrOSEIDON : RESOURCES IN PALI Zil, RECLo PROPOSED Dept. o` S DESALINATI-O N H U N T I N G f 0__N-B'-E X FACILITY The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach consists of the construction and operation of a 50-million gallons per day (MGD) seawater desalination facility. The desalination facility will take screened seawater and produce high-quality potable drinking water using a reverse osmosis desalination process. Source water for-the facility will be taken from the discharge pipeline of the existing condenser cooling water circulation system at the AES Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS). The generating station is currently permitted to circulate up to 514 MGD of seawater for the four generation units' steam condensers. The desalination facility-will use approximately 100 MGD of the cooling water after it has passed through the condensers and produce 50 MGD of high-quality potable drinking water for the use by residents and businesses in Orange County. The remaining 50 MGD of the desalination facility's seawater intake becomes concentrated seawater, which will be discharged back into HBGS's condenser cooling water system, downstream of the intake point, for dilution and discharge back into the ocean. However, if in the future, the HBGS were to cease the use of once-through cooling, or if the HBGS were to permanently alter its cooling water system's historical operations and reduce its long term seawater intake, the proposed seawater desalination facility would intake water directly from the Pacific Ocean via the existing HBGS intake pipe. In either case, and in order to protect the marine environment, 50 MGD of concentrated seawater would reenter the Pacific Ocean via the existing HBGS discharge pipe after blending with additional intake water to be used for dilution. Project The desalination facility will utilize approximately 13 acres. The facilities Facilities will be primarily single-story, Type-H light industrial steel buildings with decorative finish and a 10-MGD water storage tank. The building will house the various equipment and processes of the desalination facility. The tank will store drinking water produced at the facility. The project will also include some cast-in-place concrete construction and welded metal storage tanks. A list of the facilities to be constructed along with the size and type of construction for each is presented in Table 1. The proposed project layout and building elevations are shown in the preliminary site plans. Two on-site pipelines will be constructed to connect the desalination facility with HBGS's condenser cooling water system. A 72-inch diameter pipeline will be constructed for the seawater intake from HBGS's condenser cooling water system's discharge pipeline to the facility, and a 72-inch diameter pipeline will be constructed for the seawater concentrate discharge from the facility back to HBGS's condenser cooling water discharge pipeline. Both pipelines will be constructed entirely within the limits of the HBGS site. pipelines w .. co S'ru( The project also includes the pipelines, connections and related The projectalso includes s to Tinfrastructure necessary to deliver water into the existing regional water 'Inece necessary Item 5. - Page 140 -392- 7Poseidona alow Proposeesalination Project at-Huntington Beach Page 2 tion system, two new underground pump stations to be constructed and modifications to an existing pump station. Seven to ten miles of nch diameter potable water transmission main will be constructed project site to a point of connection with the existing OC-44 potable pipeline. The pipeline will be aligned along existing public rights-of-way through the cities of Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa. A booster pump station will be constructed near the existing Irvine Cross-Feeder located near the intersection of San Miguel Drive and Ford Road in Newport Beach. The second underground booster station will be constructed near the Coastal Junction located near the intersection of Alton Parkway and Creek Road in Irvine. In addition, the project will include modifications to an existing pump station located on Springdale Avenue and Skylab Road, in Huntington Beach. The proposed alignment of the pipeline and the location of the new underground booster and existing pump stations are discussed in the EIR that is being prepared for this project. Other infrastructure construction will include small diameter pipelines for potable water service and sanitary sewer service to the facility. These pipelines will be routed through the project site and connected to local city services at the closest practical location. Parcel Map and The desalination facility-will be constructed on a portion of the existing Subdivision of HBGS site and a proposed water tank-site that is owned by the City of Property Huntington Beach. The existing 3 parcels that currently comprise these sites will be subdivided into 4 parcels, as shown on the tentative parcel map. The proposed 10-MGD water storage tank will be constructed on Parcel 1, and the other desalination facility buildings will be constructed on Parcel 3. Hours of The plant will operate 24-hours per day, 7 days a week, and will have a total Operation and plant staff of 12 to 18 people. The number of staff on site will vary with the Staffing time of day and day of the week. Between 7:00 am and 5:00 pm Monday through Friday, 5 to 7 people will be on-site. During nights and weekends, 2 to 4 people will be on site.- Population The proposed desalination facility will provide enough potable water for the Served consumptive use of approximately 100,000 families. Potable water from the facility may be distributed throughout Orange County including the Huntington Beach area. Surrounding The desalination facility will be constructed on a portion of the existing Land Uses HBGS site and a proposed water tank-site that is owned by the City of Huntington Beach. Three 40 ft by 200 ft diameter fuel oil tanks currently occupy the site on which the desalination facility will be built. These tanks will be demolished and the desalination facility and a new water storage tank will be constructed in their place. The project site and layout of the proposed facility is shown in the attached preliminary site plans. Project site is located in an industrial area. The land use north of the project site is industrial and commercial. Commercial businesses, including the Huntington Beach Maintenance Yard are located north of the HBGS site. Northeast of the project site is the ASCON-NESI landfill site. -393- Item 5. -Page 141 Proposed Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach Page 3 Due east of the project site is the existing Edison Pipeline and Terminal Company(EPTC) tank farm. South and southeast of the project site is the Talbert Marsh Wetlands area. Immediately west of the project is the existing Southern California Edison (SCE) transformer and switchyard and HBGS. Further west of the generating station site and west of Newland Street is a residential area, which includes a mobile home park and a RV park. Hazardous Pursuant to Section -65962.5 of the Government Code and based on the Waste information that we received front the City of Huntington Beach Planning Substances Department, we certify that the project site is not located within a Hazardous Waste and Substance site. Poseidon Resources Corp. Item 5e - Page 142 -394- Proposed Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach Table 1 — Seawater Desalination acility in Huntington Beach - Facilities Description Building/Structures/Tank Area Height(ft) Type of Construction Notes Name (sq ft) RO Building 34,727 35'—0" Type II Houses RO Membrane Equipment and Pumps Pretreatment Filter Structure 59,550 28'—0" Cast-in-Place Concrete Open-air structure that houses gravity media filters similar to a conventional water treatment plant Administration Building 5,000 20'—0" Type II Multi-function building that houses administrative offices, maintenance shop,electrical room, lockers,control room, and a water quality laboratory Solids Handling Building 1,760 25'—0" Type II Houses belt filter presses and chemical feed equipment used to treat solids removed in the pretreatment process Electrical Building 4,840 35'—0" Type 11 Houses main plant transformer and switch gear Outdoor Electrical Equipment 23,541 12'-0" Concrete slab and fencing Includes open air structures that house: 1) Electrical Substation,2) Switch Gear,3)Transformers,and 4) Product Water Pumps Station Chemical Storage &Carbon 2,100 24'—0" Concrete slab and containment Houses bulk water treatment chemical tanks Dioxide Tanks curb,with steel, high density polyethylene or fiberglass tanks and metal panel screen wall. t0 N Post Treatment Tanks 5,250 27'—0" Steel tanks on concrete slab. Houses post treatment limestone tanks and equipment. Ammonia and Fluoride Tanks 558 12'—0" Concrete slab and containment Houses aqueous ammonia and fluoride storage tanks curb.High density polyethylene or fiberglass reinforced polyester tanks. Flush Tank 605 23'—0" Bolted Steel Process water storage tank Clean In Place Tank ----- ----- High density polyethylene or RO membrane clean in place tank. Located in RO building fiberglass reinforced polyester tank. Influent Pump Station 2,184 20'—0" Cast-In-Place Concrete slab Location of the influent pumps and piping.The pumps, piping, and other mechanical equipment are above grade M a Surge Tank 408 20'—0" Welded Steel Distribution system protection tank W Product Water Pump Station 4,176 20'—0" Cast-In-Place Concrete slab. Location of the product water pumps.The pumps, piping �0 and other mechanical equipment are above grade 2) Product Water Storage Tank 49,481 30'LL] Cast-In-Place Concrete 10-MG water storage tank. M W Item 5. - Page 144 -396- Citv of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUIL BUILDING NG www.huntingtonbeachca.gov Planning Division Building Division 714.536.5271 714.536-.5241 August 23, 2010 Josie McKinley Poseidon Resources Corp. 17011 Beach Blvd:, Suite 900 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 SUBJECT: ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 (SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT) — 21730 NEWLAND PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS Dear Applicant, In order to assist you with your development proposal, staff has reviewed the project and identified applicable city policies, standard_plans, and development and use requirements, excerpted from the City of Huntington Beach Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Codes. This list is intended to help you through the permitting process and various stages of project implementation. It should be noted that this requirement list is in addition to any "conditions of approval" adopted by the City Council. Please note that if the design of your project or site conditions change, the list may also change. If you would like a clarification of any of these requirements, an explanation of the Huntington Beach Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Codes, or believe some of the items listed do not apply to your project, and/or you would like to discuss them in further detail, please contact me at- RRamos0_)surfcity-hb.orq or 714-536-5624 and/or the respective source department (contact person below). Sincerely, - Ricky Ramos Senior Planner Enclosure cc: Gerald Caraig, Planning and Building Department—714-374-1575 Darin Maresh, Fire Department—714-536-5531 Steve Bogart, Public Works—714-374-1692 Herb Fauland, Planning Manager Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager Jason Kelley, Senior Planner Property Owner Project File -397- Item 5. - Page 145 s HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT HUNTINGTON BEACH PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS DATE: August 23, 2010 PROJECT NAME: SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. 2010-37 AND 161 ENTITLEMENTS: ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130/DESIGN-REVIEW NO. 10-004 (SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT) DATE OF PLANS: EPA-AUGUST 12, 2016/TPM -AUGUST 11, 2010 PROJECT LOCATION: 21730 NEWLAND PLAN REVIEWER: RICKY RAMOS, SENIOR PLANNER TELEPHONE/E-MAIL: 714-536-5624/RRAMOS@SURFCITY-HB.ORG PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 50 MGD SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT The following is a list of code requirements deemed applicable to the proposed project based on plans stated above. The list is intended to assist the applicant by identifying requirements which must be satisfied during the various stages of project permitting and implementation. A list of conditions of approval adopted by the City Council in conjunction with the requested entitlement(s), if any, will also be provided upon final project approval. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Plan Reviewer. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130: 1. Prior to submittal of-the final parcel map to the Public Works Department for processing and approval, final parcel map review fees shall be paid, pursuant to the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the City-Council (City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department Fee Schedule). (HBZSO Section 254.16) 2. Prior to approval of final map, the subject property shall enter into irrevocable access easement(s), between the subject site and adjacent properties as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130. The location and width of the accessway shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Building Department and Public Works Department. The subject property owner shall be responsible for making necessary improvements to implement the access easements. The legal instrument shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department a minimum of 30 days prior to final map approval. The document shall be approved by the Planning and Building Department and the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder prior to final building permit approval. A copy of the recorded document shall be filed with the Planning and Building Department for inclusion in the entitlement file prior to final building permit Item 5e - Page 146 -398- Page 2 of 5 approval. The recorded agreement shall remain in effect in perpetuity, except as modified or rescinded pursuant to the expressed written approval of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The Departments of Planning and Building, Public Works and Fire shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with all code requirements. The Planning and Building Director and Public Works Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to parcel map are proposed during the plan check process. Permits shall not be issued until the Planning and Building Director and Public-Works Director have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the City Council may be required pursuant tothe HBZSO. ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001: 1. The site plans, floor plans, elevations, and landscaping plan approved by the City Council shall be the conceptually approved design with the following modifications. a. Parking lot striping and drive aisle widths shall comply with Chapter 231 of the HBZSO. b. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to, back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public right-of-ways. Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. c. All exterior mechanical equipment shall be screened from view on all sides. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be setback a minimum of 15 feet from the exterior edges of the building. Equipment to be screened includes, but is not limited to, heating, air conditioning, refrigeration equipment, plumbing lines, ductwork and transformers. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors. If screening is not designed specifically into the building, a rooftop mechanical equipment plan showing proposed screening must be submitted for review and approval with the application for building permit(s). d. Depict the location of all gas meters, water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units, mailboxes (as approved by the United States Postal Service), and similar items on the site plan and elevations. If located on a building, they shall be architecturally integrated with the design of the building, non-obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required setbacks. e. All parking area lighting shall be energy efficient and designed so as not to produce glare on - adjacent residential properties. Security lighting shall be provided in areas accessible to the public during nighttime hours, and such lighting shall be on a time-clock or photo-sensor system. (HBZSO 231.18(C)) f. Bicycle parking facilities shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of HBZSO Section 231.20 (Bicycle Parking). g. Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130, Parcel 1 (tank site) shall provide at minimum six (6) percent of net site area as landscaping. Parcel 3 (desalination structures) shall provide at minimum (8) percent of net site area as landscaping. For Parcels 1 and 3 the applicant shall revise the landscaping plan to show compliance with the landscaping area requirements noted above. The landscaping plan shall be fully dimensioned so that city staff can verify the landscaping calculations provided by the applicant. For Parcels 2 and 4, the applicantiproperty owner shall provide no less than the parent parcel's existing landscaping percentage at the time of submittal of Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130. (HBZSO Chapter 232) -399- Item 5. - Page 147 Page 3 of 5 h. Parking lot landscaping shall be provided pursuant to HBZSO Chapter 232. i. Include setbacks to all property lines after dedication on the site plan in compliance with the HBZSO. j. Demonstrate that the proposed eight foot high perimeter wall complies with all required visibility cutoff pursuant to HBZSO 230.88. 2. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall follow all procedural requirements and regulations of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and any other local, state, or federal law regarding the removal and disposal of any hazardous material including asbestos, lead, and PCB's. These requirements include but are not limited to: survey, identification of removal methods, containment measures, use and treatment of water, proper truck hauling, disposal procedures, and proper notification to any and all involved agencies. b. Pursuant to the requirements of the South Coast Air-Quality Management District, an asbestos survey shall be completed. c. The applicant shall complete all Notification requirements of the South Coast Air-Quality Management District. d. The City of Huntington Beach shall receive written verification from the South Coast Air Quality Management District that the Notification procedures have been completed. e. All asbestos shall be removed from all structures prior to demolition. 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed: Blockwall/fencing plans (including a site plan, section drawings and elevations, depicting the height and material of all freestanding walls and fences) consistent with the grading plan, shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning and Building Department. Double walls shall be prohibited. Prior to construction of any new property line walls or fences, a plan, approved by the owners of adjacent properties, and identifying the removal of any existing walls, shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department for review and approval. The plans shall identify proposed wall and fence materials, seep holes and drainage. 4. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. One set of project plans, revised pursuant to Condition of Approval No. 1 and Code Requirement No. 1, and 8.5 inch by 11 inch colored renderings, elevations, and materials sample board shall be submitted for review, approval and inclusion in the entitlement file, to the Planning and Building Department. b. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval, code requirements identified herein and code requirements identified in separately transmitted memorandum from the Departments of Fire and Public Works and Building Division shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. c. A minimum of 14 days prior to submittal for building permits, an application for address assignment, along with the corresponding application processing fee and applicable plans (as specified in the address assignment application form), shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department. d. Contact the United States Postal Service for approval of mailbox location(s). . Item 5. - Page 148 -400- Page 4 of 5 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. An interim parking and building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department to assure adequate parking and restroom facilities are available for employees, customers and contractors during the project's construction phase and that adjacent properties will not be impacted by their location. The plan shall also be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and Public Works Department. The applicant shall obtain any necessary encroachment permits from the Department of Public Works. b. A Mitigation Monitoring Fee for SEIR No. 10-001 shall be paid to the Planning and Building Department pursuant to the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the City Council (City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department Fee Schedule). c. All new commercial and industrial development and all new residential development not covered by Chapter 254 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, except for mobile home parks, shall pay a park fee, pursuant to the provisions of HBZSO Section 230.20 — Payment of Park Fee. The fees shall be paid and calculated according to a schedule adopted by City Council resolution (City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department Fee Schedule). d. The final parcel map shall be recorded with the County of Orange. & During demolition, grading, site development, and/or construction, the project shall adhere to all Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code requirements including the Noise Ordinance. All activities including truck deliveries associated with construction, grading, remodeling, or repair shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Such activities are prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 7. The structure(s) cannot be occupied, the final building permit(s) cannot be approved, utilities cannot be released, the use shall not commence, and a Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until the following have been completed: a. All improvements must be completed in accordance with approved plans, except as provided for by conditions of approval. b. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning and Building Department. c. Compliance with all conditions of approval and code requirements specified herein shall be verified by the Planning and Building Department. - - d. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. e. A Certificate of Occupancy must be approved and issued by the Planning and Building Department. & The Development Services Departments (Planning and Building, Fire, and Public Works) shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable code requirements and conditions of approval. The Director of Planning and Building may approve minor amendments to plans and/or conditions of approval as appropriate based on changed circumstances, new information or other relevant factors. Any proposed plan/project revisions shall be called out on the plan sets submitted for building permits. Permits shall not be issued until the Development Services Departments have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's -401- Item 5. - Page 149 Page 5 of 5 action. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the City Council may be required pursuant to the provisions of HBZSO Section 241.18. 9. The applicant and/or applicant's representative shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for review and approval. 10. The City Council reserves the right to revoke Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of the conditions of approval, Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 11. The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code, Planning and Building Department, Public Works Department, and Fire Department, as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 12. Construction shall be limited to Monday— Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays-and Federal holidays. 13. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$50.00 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning and Building Department within two (2) days of the City Council's approval of entitlements. 14. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Building and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the City Council. 15. Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 and Entitlement Plan Amendments No. 10-001 which amends Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 shall not become effective until the ten working day appeal period has elapsed for the Coastal Development Permit. Because the project is in the-appealable area of the coastal zone, there is a ten working day appeal period that commences when the California Coastal Commission receives the City's notification of final action. Item 5. - Page 150 -402- From: Gerald Caraig Ext.: 1575 3/4/10 To: Ricky Ramos Project Location: 21730 Newland, Poseidon 50 MGD Water Desalination Plant BUILDING comments for eur 02-04 -A-,& Io-oo I I. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. None 11. CODE ISSUES BASED ON PLANS & DRAWINGS SUBMITTED: 1. Project shall comply with the current state building codes adopted by the City at the time of permit application submittal. Currently they are 200-7-California Building Code (CBC), 2007 California Mechanical Code, 2007 California Plumbing Code, 2007 California Electrical Code, 2007 California ---Energy Code and the Huntington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC). Compliance to all applicable state and local codes is required prior-to issuance of building permit. 2. All buildings and non-building structures not used-to produce, generate, or used in the transmission of water must have a building permit. (Muni Code 17.04.032) 3. The following code items require assessment by the applicant to facilitate project review at submittal, please note that this is not all inclusive and may-be adjusted as more complete project documents are provided: a. Occupancy classification of all structures (CBC Chapter 3) b. Classification of Hazardous occupancies (CBC Section 307) c. Special detailed requirements of hazardous materials (CBC Section 414, 415) d. Allowable heights and areas of structures (CBC Chapter 5) e. Types of proposed construction (CBC Chapter 6) f. Fire resistance rated construction (CBC Chapter 7) g. Fire separation distances and its impact to construction rating (CBC Section 702) h. Required fire protection systems (CBC Chapter 9) i. Means of egress (CBC Chapter 10) j. Accessibility (CBC Chapter 1 1 B) o Path of travel from an accessible parking stall shown on the Admin Building Floor Plan cannot traverse behind parked cars other than their own (CBC Section 1 129B.3) k. Interior environment (CBC Chapter 12) I. Number of toilet facilities and fixture counts (CPC Chapter 4) m. Structural assessment of all proposed structures (CBC Volume 2, ASCE 7-05) o Vertical and lateral design (CBC Chapter 16, ASCE 7-05) o Seismic design provisions for non-building structures (ASCE 7-05 Chapter 15) It is encouraged that the applicant contact Building to go over code issues during the preliminary and design phase to facilitate and resolve code elements that may prove disadvantageous to the project. -403- Item 5. - Page 151 0 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION 1 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS DATE: AUGUST 23, 2010 PROJECT NAME: POSEIDON SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS: EPA 10-01, DR 10-04, EIR 10-01 PLNG APPLICATION NO: 2010-0037 DATE OF PLANS: JUNE 14, 2010 PROJECT LOCATION: 21730 NEWLAND STREET PROJECT PLANNER: RICKY RAMOS, SENIOR PLANNER TELEPHONEIE-MAIL: 714-536-5624/RRAMOS(aD-SURFCITY-HB.ORG PLAN REVIEWERS:- STEVE BOGART, SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER44 ` DEBORAH DEBOW, ACTING PRINCIPAL CE TELEPHONE/E-MAIL: 714-374-1692/SBOGART(a)SURFCITY-HB.ORG f PROJECT DESCRIPTION: TO AMEND CUP 02-04 I CDP 02-05 BY REVISING LOCATION, I SITE LAYOUT, FLOOR PLANS, AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR A 50 MGD SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT. THE REVISED PLANS INCORPORATE THE CITY'S TANK SITE LOCATED NORTH OF POSEIDON'S PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LOCATION. t } THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SUPERSEDE THOSE OF THE PREVIOUS MEMO TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATED MARCH 11, 2010 AND JULY 9, 2010. i { THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A DEMOLITION PERMIT: 1. Applicant shall provide a consulting arborist report on all the existing trees within 30 feet of the said construction, demolition and grading impacts. Said report shall quantify, identify, size and analyze the health of the existing trees. The report shall also recommend how the existing trees that are to remain (if any) shall be protected and how far construction/grading shall be kept from the trunk. (Resolution 4545) a. Existing mature trees that are to be removed shall be replaced at a 2-for-1 ratio with a 36" box tree or palm equivalent. i Item 5. - Page 152 -404- 14 f +a t 3 THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT: I 2. The following dedications to the City of Huntington Beach shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. (ZSO 230.84A) a. Twelve feet (12') of additional right-of-way dedication shall be dedicated along the lease area limits of the Edison Avenue project frontage. b. A 31-foot radius of additional right-of-way shall be-dedicated at the southeast corner of Newland Street and Edison Avenue,per Public Works Standard Plan No. 207. ! c.---Necessary right-of-way to construct a turnaround at the easterly end of Edison Avenue- per Development Requirement No. 6.f below. 3. A Legal Description and Plot Plan of the dedications to the City shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor or engineer and submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The f dedications-shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 4. A final detailed soils and geological/seismic analysis shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted to Public Works (for reference) with first submittal of the Precise Grading Plan. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations for grading, over excavation, engineered fill, dewatering, settlement, protection of adjacent structures, chemical and fill properties, i liquefaction, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. (MC 17,05.150) 5. A Precise Grading Plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. (MC 17.05/ZSO 230.84) The plans shall comply with Public Works plan preparation guidelines and include the following improvements on the plan: a. A new sewer lateral shall be installed, per Public Works Standards, to serve the subject project and shall connect to the newly extended 8-inch sewer main required per Public Works Condition of Approval No 4.a. (ZSO 230.84) } b. A new domestic water service and meter shall be installed per Water Division Standards s` and sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the California Plumbing Code (CPC). The domestic water service shall be a minimum of 2-inch in size. (ZSO 232) c. A separate irrigation water service and meter shall be installed per Water Division Standards. The water service shall be a minimum of 1-inch in size. (ZSO 232) i d. A separate dedicated fire service line shall be constructed per Water Division Standards 3 for the fire sprinkler system required by the Fire Department. (ZSO 230.84) e. A separate backflow protection device shall be installed, per Water Division Standards, on the domestic, irrigation and fire water services. (Resolution 5921 and Title 17) 6. A Street Improvement Plan, prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. (ZSO 230.84) The following public improvements shall be shown on the plan: j a. Curb and gutter along the project's Edison Avenue frontage, per Public Works Standard ` Plan No. 202. (ZSO 230.84) b. A.C. paving, to the new construction centerline on Edison Avenue, plus an adequate feathered overlay section to provide a smooth pavement transition along the project's Edison Avenue frontage, within a 42 foot full-width street right-of-way per modified Public Works Standard Plan Nos. 104 (which includes an 8 foot parking lane on the north side l E 2 i -405- Item 5. - Page 1531 of Edison Avenue, a 24-foot driving lane, a 6- foot parkway on the north and a 4-foot wide utility easement on the south side of Edison Avenue). (ZSO 230.84) c. An ADA compliant access ramp shall be constructed at the southeast corner of Newland Street and Edison Avenue, per Caltrans Standard Plan A88A. (ZSO 230.84; GP, CE 2, ADA) d. A 35-foot curb return radius shall be constructed at the southeast comer of Newland Street and Edison Avenue, per Public Works Standard Plan No.207. (ZSO 230.84) e. A 25 foot sight triangle shall be-provided at the southeast corner of Newland Street and Edison Avenue. (ZSO 230.88) f. A turnaround (shall be constructed at the easterly end of Edison Avenue. (ZSO 230.84) g. A new driveway shall be constructed, per Public Works Standard Plan-No-.- 211, to provide access from Edison Avenue to the proposed booster station site. (ZSO 230.84) h. Street lights, consistent with current Public Works standards, shall be installed along the project's Edison Avenue frontage. (ZSO 230,84; GP, CE 2) 7. A signing and striping plan for Edison Avenue shall be prepared by a Licensed Civil or Traffic Engineer and be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and-approval. The plans shall be prepared according to the City of Huntington Beach Signing and Striping Plan Preparation Guidelines. (ZSO 230.84) 8. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan, prepared by a Licensed Landscape Architect shall be ` submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments. (ZSO 232.04) a. Existing mature trees that are to be removed must be replaced at a 2 for 1 ratio with a 36" box tree or palm equivalent (13'-14' of trunk height for Queen Palms and 8'-9' of brown trunk). b. "Smart irrigation controllers" and/or other innovative means to reduce the quantity of runoff shall be installed. (ZSO 232.04D) t c. Standard landscape code requirements apply. (ZSO 232) 9. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. (ZSO 232.0413) 10. Landscaping plans should utilize native, drought-tolerant landscape materials where appropriate and feasible. (DAMP) 11. The Consulting Arborist (approved by the City Landscape Architect) shall review the final landscape tree planting plan and approve in writing the selection and locations proposed for i new trees and the protection measures and locations of existing trees to remain. Said Arborist report shall be incorporated onto the Landscape Architect's plans as construction j notes and/or construction requirements. The report shall include the Arborist's name, certificate number and the Arborist's wet signature on the final plan. (Resolution-4545) 12. The Water Ordinance #14.52, the "Water Efficient Landscape Requirements" apply for all projects with landscaping. (MC 14.52) 13. A Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis shall be submitted for Public Works review and approval (10, 25, and 100-year storms and back to back storms shall be analyzed). In addition, this study shall include 24-hour peak back-to-back 100-year storms for onsite detention analysis. The drainage improvements shall be designed and constructed as 3 C. Item 5. - Page 154 -406- required by the Department of Public Works to mitigate impact-of increased runoff due to development, or deficient, downstream systems. Design of all necessary drainage improvements shall provide mitigation for all rainfall event frequencies up to a 100-year frequency. (ZSO 230.84) 14.A sewer study shall be prepared and submitted to Public Works for review and approval. A fourteen (14)-day or longer flow test data shall be included in the study. The sanitary sewer system shall be designed and constructed to serve the project, including any offsite improvements necessary to accommodate any increased flow associated with the project. The location and number of monitoring test sites, not to exceed three, to be determined by the Public Works Department. (ZSO 230.84/MC 14.36.010) 15. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits for projects that will result in soil disturbance of one or more acres of land, the applicant shall demonstrate that coverage has been obtained under the Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2009-0009- s DWQ) [General Construction Permit] by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent(NOI) submitted to the State of California Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID)Number. Projects subject to this requirement shall prepare and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP) conforming to the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements shall be submitted to the Department of Public j Works for review and acceptance.A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and another copy to be submitted to the City. (DAMP) 16.A Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) conforming to the current Waste Discharge Requirements Permit for the County of Orange (Order No. R8-2009-0030) [MS4 Permit] prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and acceptance. The WQMP shall address Section XII of the MS4 Permit and all current surface water quality issues. t 17.The project WQMP shall include the following: a. Low Impact Development. b. Discusses regional or watershed programs (if applicable). c. Addresses Site Design BMPs (as applicable) such as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability, minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating i reduced or"zero discharge" areas, and conserving natural areas. i d. Incorporates the applicable Routine Source Control BMPs as defined in the Drainage Area Management Plan. (DAMP) i e_ Incorporates Treatment Control BMPs as defined in the DAMP. f. Generally describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for the Treatment Control BMPs. g. Identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs. h. Describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs. i. Includes an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for all structural BMPs. 4 -407- Item 5. - Page 155 j. After incorporating plan check comments of Public Works, three final WQMPs (signed by the owner and the Registered Civil Engineer of record) shall be submitted to Public Works for acceptance. After acceptance, two copies of the final report shall be returned to applicant for the production of a single complete electronic copy of the accepted version of the WQMP on CD media that includes: i) The 11" by 17" Site Plan in .TIFF format(400 by 400 dpi minimum). ii) The remainder of the complete WQMP in .PDF format including the signed and stamped title sheet, owner's certification sheet, Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility sheet, appendices, attachments and all educational material. k. The applicant shall return one CD media to Public Works for the project record file. 18. Indicate the type and location of Water Quality Treatment Control Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan consistent with the Project WQMP. The WQMP shall be submitted with the first submittal of the Grading Plan. ' 19.A suitable location, as approved by the City, shall be depicted on the grading plan for the necessary trash enclosure(s). The area shall be paved with an impervious surface, designed not to allow run-on from adjoining areas, designed to divert drainage from adjoining roofs and pavements diverted around the area, and screened or walled to prevent off-site transport of trash. The trash enclosure area shall be covered or roofed with a solid, impervious material. Connection of trash area drains into the storm drain system is prohibited. If feasible, the trash enclosure area shall be connected into the sanitary sewer. (DAMP) 20. The applicant's grading/erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control. (AQMD Rule 403) 21.The name and phone number of an on-site field supervisor hired by the developer shall be submitted to the Planning and Public Works Departments. In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site every 250 feet indicating who shall be contacted I for information regarding this development and any construction/grading-related concerns. This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity. He/She will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities, truck routes, construction hours, noise, etc. Signs shall include the applicant's contact number, regarding grading and construction activities, and "1-800-CUTSMOG" in the event there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No. 403. i 22.The applicant shall notify all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property of a tentative grading schedule at least 30 days prior to such grading. 23. The Final Parcel Map shall be recorded with the Office of the County Recorder. (SMA) i I i THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH DURING i GRADING OPERATIONS: 24. The developer shall coordinate the development of a truck haul route with the Department of Public Works if the import or export of material in excess of 5000 cubic yards is required. This plan shall include the approximate number of truck trips and the proposed truck haul routes. It shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to r 5 i Item 5e - Page 156 -408- I r s l i mitigate construction-related impacts to adjacent residents. These plans must be submitted for approval to the Department of Public Works. (MC 17.05.210) l 25.Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available to be used throughout the day during site grading to keep the soil damp enough to prevent dust being raised by the operations. (California Stormwater BMP Handbook, Construction Wind Erosion WEA) 26.All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 8:00 a.m. or leave the site no later than l 5:00 p.m., and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only. (MC 17.05) 27.-Wet down the areas that are to be graded or that is being graded, in the late morning and t after work is completed for the day. (WE-11MC 17.05) I 28.The construction disturbance area shall be kept as small as possible. (California Stormwater BMP Handbook, Construction erosion Control EC-1) (DAMP) 29.All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas. (DAMP) i 30: Prior to leaving the site, all--haul trucks shall be washed off on-site on a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets. (DAMP) 31. Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas. (AQMD RuleA03) 32. Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site. (DAMP) 33.All construction materials, wastes, grading or demolition debris and stockpiles of soils, aggregates, soil amendments, etc. shall be properly covered, stored and secured to prevent transport into surface or ground waters by wind, rain, tracking, tidal erosion or dispersion. (DAMP) THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO r ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 34, A Precise Grading Permit shall be issued. (MC 17.05) 35.A drainage fee for the subject development shall be paid at the rate applicable at the time of Building Permit issuance. The current rate of $13,880 per gross acre is subject to periodic adjustments. This project consists of 12.99 gross acres (including its tributary area portions along the half street frontages) for a total required drainage fee of $180,301. City records i indicate the previous use on this property never paid this required fee. Per provisions of the I City Municipal Code, this one time fee shall be paid for all subdivisions or development of land. (MC 14.48) 36. Traffic Impact Fees based on the new daily vehicle trips the project is forecast to generate shall be paid at the rate applicable at the time of Building Permit issuance. The current rate per net new added daily trip is $162 and is adjusted annually on December 1. (MC 17.85) THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: 37.An Encroachment Permit is required for all work within the City's right-of-way. (MC 12.38.0101MC 14.36.030) 38. The required Street Improvement Plan shall be approved and signed by Public Works. I I 6 i i t 1 -409- Item 5e - Page 157' THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION OR OCCUPANCY: 39.Complete all improvements as shown on the approved grading, and landscape and improvement plans. (MC 17.05) 40.All new utilities shall be undergrounded. (MC 17.64) 41.All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid at the current rate unless otherwise stated, per the Public Works Fee Schedule adopted by the City Council and available on the city web site at http://www.surfeity-hb.org/files/users/public works/fee_schedule.pdf. (ZSO 240.06/ZSO 250.16) 42. Prior to grading or building permit close-out and/or the issuance of a certificate of use or-a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall: - --a. Demonstrate that all structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) described in the Project WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications. E}`_Demonstrate all drainage courses, pipes, gutters, basins, etc. are clean and properly constructed. c. Demonstrate that applicant is prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs described in the Project WQMP. d. Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved Project WQMP are available for the future occupiers. 43. The current tree code requirements shall apply to this site. (ZSO 232) a. Existing trees to remain on site shall not be disfigured or mutilated, (ZSO 232.04E) and, b. General tree requirements, regarding quantities and sizes_ (ZSO 232.08B and C) 44.All landscape irrigation and planting installation shall be certified to be in conformance to the ` City approved landscape plans by the Landscape Architect of record in written form to the City Landscape Architect. (ZSO 232.04D) 45.Applicant shall provide City with CD media TIFF images (in City format) and CD (AutoCAD only) copy of complete City Approved landscape construction drawings as stamped i "Permanent File Copy" prior to starting landscape work. Copies shall be given to the City j Landscape Architect for permanent City record. 46. All Water Efficient Landscape Requirements certifications, audits and paper work shall be complete prior to requesting a final inspection. (MC 14.52) i i i i 1 ki t f S fi f 2 t 7 j i f t Item 5. - Page 158 -410- • JJ HUNTINGTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE: MARCH 8, 2010 PROJECT NAME: POSEIDON SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 2010-1 PROJECT LOCATION: 21730 NEWLAND, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA PLANNER: RICKY RAMOS, ASSOCIATE PLANNER TELEPHONE/E-MAIL: (714)536-5624/rramos@surfcity-hb.org PLAN REVIEWER-FIRE: DARIN MARESH, FIRE DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST TELEPHONE/E-MAIL: (714) 536-5531/dmaresh(a-)surfcity-hb.orq PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EPA-TO AMEND THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS FOR THE 50 MGD DESALINATION PROJECT BY REVISING THE LOCATION, SITE LAYOUT, FLOOR PLANS,AND ELEVATIONS. THE REVISED PLANS INCORPORATE THE CITY'S TANK SITE LOCATED NORTH OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LOCATION. DRB—TO REVIEW THE DESIGN, COLORS, AND MATERIALS FOR THE PROJECT. EIR—TO ANALYZE THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT. The following is a list of code requirements deemed applicable to the proposed project based on plans received and dated February 17, 2010. The list is intended to assist the applicant by identifying requirements which must be satisfied during the various stages of project permitting and implementation. A list of conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission in conjunction with the requested entitlement(s), if any, will also be provided upon final project approval. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Plan Reviewer- Fire: DARIN MARESH, FIRE DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, GRADING, SITE DEVELOPMENT, ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS, BUILDING PERMITS, AND/OR CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE REQUIRED: Environmental Environmental — Oil well on property. Methane Mitigation District Requirements. The proposed construction is within the City of Huntington Beach Methane Mitigation District. -411- Item 5. - Page 159 Page 2 of 7 The following City Specifications are applicable and compliance needs to be referenced in the grading, building, and methane plans: • City Specification#422, Oil Well Abandonment Permit Process. • City Specification # 429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. • City Specification# 431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards. NOTE: An abandoned oil well is located on the proposed construction property. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 1. DOGGR "CONSTRUCTION SITE REVIEW"is required. A Califomia Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources (DOGGR— 714-816-6847),Site Plan Review is required for this project. (See included application). Identify the well name and well API number. Show the location of the abandoned oil well in question. Accurately locate with "x" and "y" parameters delineated.A completed DOGGR Site Plan Review must be on-file with the Fire Department prior to plan approval. Wells identified in the Site Review not meeting current DOGGR requirements may require re-abandonment. If required, the following permits shall be obtained and submitted: • From the Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources (DOGGR—(714) 816-6847), provide a Permit to Conduct Well Operations for all on-site active/abandoned oil wells. • Obtain a Huntington Beach Fire Department Permit to Abandon Oil Well and follow the requirements of City Specification #422, Oil Well Abandonment Permit Process. Reference compliance with City Specification #422, Oil Well Abandonment Permit Process in the plan notes. (Location of the well is not certain, waiting on DOGGR Site Review to determine the requirements based on location to the project) DEPENDING ON THE LOCATION OF THE ABANDONED WELL(S)TO THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MAY BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 2. "OIL WELL HISTORY DISPOSITION REPORT' is required. A California licensed third- party petroleum engineer or geologist compiles a disposition report for submittal to the Fire Department— Development Section. (see City Specification #429, section 3.2) 3. "CITY CONSULTANT- OIL WELL HISTORY REVIEW' is required. The city consultant reviews the submitted OIL WELL HISTORY DISPOSITION REPORT for completeness, Item 5. - Page 160 -412- Page 3 of 7 well integrity, and recommended safety measures. (see City Specification #429, section 3.3) 4. "SOIL TESTING"is required. Based on site characteristics, suspected soil contamination, proximity to a producing or abandoned oil well, Phase 1,11, or III Site Audit, soil testing is required. Soil testing plan must be approved by the Fire Department. (See City Specification#429, section 3.4 and City Specification #431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards). Note: Grading Plans must be approved by the Fire Department-poor to issuance of a Public Works grading permit. Standard Fire Department notes are required to be on the plans on oil industry impacted sites. Additional requirements will be necessary for the development of former oilfield property. Soil testing results must be submitted, and approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. "REMEDIATION ACTION PLAN" If contamination is identified, provide a Fire Department approved Remediation Action Plan (RAP) based on requirements found in Huntington Beach City Specification #431-92, Soil Cleanup Standard. Upon remediation action plan approval, a rough grading permit may be issued. 6. "METHANE SAFETY MEASURES"are required. -City Specification #429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. Methane safety measures shall be detailed on a separate sheet titled "METHANE PLAN" and three copies submitted to the Fire Department Development Section for approval. Reference compliance with City Specification #429 in the plan notes. Discovery of additional soil contamination or underground pipelines, etc., must be reported to the-Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly. Reference that all soils shall be in compliance with City Specification #431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards, in the plan notes. Fire Code Permit for Tank Removal/Installation. installation and/or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks (UST) require the applicant to first obtain an approved Orange County Environmental Health Care UST permit/site plan. This approved plan must be presented in order to obtain the required Huntington Beach Fire Department Fire Code Permit Application to conduct installation and/or removal operations. (FD) Fire Apparatus Access Fire Access Roads shall be provided and maintained in compliance with City Specification # 401, Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access. Driving area shall be capable of supporting a fire apparatus (75,000 Ibs and 12,000 lb point load). Minimum fire access road width is twenty- four feet (24') wide, with thirteen feet six inches (13' 6") vertical clearance. Fire access roads -413- Item 5. - Page 161 Page 4 of 7 fronting commercial buildings shall be a minimum width of twenty-six feet(26')wide, with thirteen feet six inches (13' 6") vertical clearance. For Fire Department approval, reference and demonstrate compliance with City Specification #401 Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access on the plans. (FD) Secured Vehicle Entries shall utilize KNOX®activated access switches (Knox switches for automated gates, Knox padlocks for manual gates), and comply with City Specification#403, Fire Access for Pedestrian or Vehicular Security Gates & Buildings. Reference compliance in the plan notes. (FD) Fire Hydrants and Water Systems Private Fire Hydrants are required. Hydrants must be portrayed on the site plan. Hydrants shall be installed and in service before combustible construction begins. Installation of hydrantsand service mains shall meet NFPA 13 and 24, 2002 Edition, Huntington Beach Fire Code Appendix B and C, and City Specification#407 Fire Hydrant Installation Standards requirements. Private fire hydrants shall not be pressurized by Fire Department Connections to the sprinkler system. The system design shall ensure that recirculation of pressurized water from the hydrant, thru the FDC and back through the sprinkler system supply to the hydrant does not occur. Installation of the private fire service main, including fire department connections, shall meet NFPA 13 and 24, 2002 Edition requirements. Maximum allowed velocity of fire flow in supply piping is 12 fps. The maintenance of private fire hydrants is the responsibility of the owner or facility association. Shop drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. For Fire Department approval, portray the fire hydrants and reference compliance with City Specification #407 Fire Hydrant Installation Standards in the plan notes. (FD) • Private Fire Water Services - Separate plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department detailing the private fire water service. Plans shall detail the fire service piping, hydrants, fire department sprinkler system connections (FDC), post-indicating valves (PIV), fire pumps,water tanks, thrust-blocks, and other appropriate system details. The connection, valves and back-flow prevention (DDCA) should also be shown for reference. Fire Suppression Systems Fire Alarms Fire Alarm System is required. For Fire Department approval, shop drawings shall be submitted to the Fire Department as separate plans for permits and approval. For Fire Department approval, reference and demonstrate compliance with IBC 305.9 on the plans. A C- 10 electrical contractor, certified in fire alarm systems, must certify the system is operational annually. (FD) Item 5. - Page 162 -414- Page 5 of 7 Fire Sprinklers NOTE: Significant changes to the Huntington Beach Fire Code have occurred as of January 1, 2008 as a result of the adoption of the International Fire and Building Codes by the State of-California. An option may be available to the applicant to demise a portion of the structure with a rated fire barrier. Fire sprinklers will-be required for fire areas 5000 square feet or greater or combined floor areas 10,000 square feet or greater per adopted Huntington Beach Fire Department amendments. (FD) Automatic Fire Sprinklers are required. NFPA13 Automatic fire sprinkler systems are required per Huntington Beach Fire Code for new buildings with "fire areas" 5000 square feet. Separate plans (three sets) shall-be submitted to the Fire Department for permits and approval. The system shall provide water flow, tamper and trouble alarms, manual pull stations, interior and exterior horns and strobes, and 24-hour-central station-monitoring. Automatic fire-sprinkler systems must be maintained operational at all times, with maintenance inspections performed quarterly and the system serviced every five years by a state licensed C-16 Fire=Protection Contractor. For Fire Department approval, reference that a fire sprinkler system will be installed in compliance with the Huntington Beach Fire Code, NFPA 13, and City Specification #420 -Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in the plan notes. NOTE: When buildings under construction are more than one (1) story in height and required to have automatic fire sprinklers, the fire sprinkler system shall be installed and operational to protect all floors lower than the floor currently under construction. Fire sprinkler systems for the current floor under construction shall be installed, in-service, inspected and approved prior to beginning construction on the next floor above. (FD) Fire Sprinkler Supply Fire Department Connections (FDC) to the automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be located to the front of the building, at least 25 feet from and no farther than 150 feet of a properly rated fire hydrant. (FD) Fire Protection Systems Fire Extinguishers shall be installed and located in all areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code standards found in City Specification #424. The minimum required dry chemical fire extinguisher size is 2A 1013C and shall be installed within 75 feet travel distance to all portions of the building. Extinguishers are required to be serviced or replaced annually. (FD) -415- Item 5. - Page 163 Page 6 of 7 Fire Personnel Access Main Secured Building Entries shall utilize a KNOX® Fire Department Access Key Box, installed and in compliance with City Specification#403, Fire Access for Pedestrian or Vehicular Security Gates & Buildings. Please contact the Huntington Beach Fire Department Administrative Office at (714) 536-5411 for information. Reference compliance with City Specification#403 - KNOX& Fire Department Access in the building plan notes. (FD) Addressing and Street Names Structure-or Building Address Assignments. The Planning Department shall review and make address assignments. The individual dwelling units shall be identified with numbers per City Specification #409 Street Naming and Address Assignment Process. For Fire Department approval, reference compliance with City Specification#409 Street Naming and Address Assignment Process in the plan notes. (FD) GIS Mapping Information GIS Mapping Information shall be provided to the Fire Department incompliance with GIS Department CAD Submittal Guideline requirements. Minimum submittals shall include the following: ➢ Site plot plan showing the building footprint. ➢ Specify the type of use for the building ➢ Location of electrical, gas, water, sprinkler system shut-offs. ➢ Fire Sprinkler Connections (FDC) if any. ➢ Knox Access locations for doors, gates, and vehicle access. ➢ Street name and address. Final site plot plan shall be submitted in the following digital format and shall include the following: ➢ Submittal media shall be via CD rom to the Fire Department. ➢ Shall be in accordance with County of Orange Ordinance 3809. ➢ File format shall be in .shp, AutoCAD, AUTOCAD MAP (latest possible release ) drawing file - .DWG (preferred) or Drawing Interchange File - .DXF. ➢ Data should be in NAD83 State Plane, Zone 6, Feet Lambert Conformal Conic Projection. ➢ Separate drawing file for each individual sheet. In compliance with Huntington Beach Standard Sheets, drawing names, pen colors, and layering convention. and conform to City of Huntington Beach Specification #409 — Street Naming and Addressing. For specific GIS technical requirements, contact the Huntington Beach GIS Department at (714) 536-5574. Item 5. - Page 164 -416- Page 7 of 7 For Fire Department approval, reference compliance with GIS Mapping Information in the building plan notes. (FD) Building Construction Exit Signs And Exit Path Markings will be provided in compliance with the Huntington Beach Fire Code and Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. Reference compliance in the plan notes. (FD) Egress Ulumination/Emergency Exit Lighting with emergency back-up power is required. Provide means of egress illumination per HBFC 604.2.4 and UBC 1003.2.9. (FD) THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION: a. Fire/Emergency Access And Site Safety shall be maintained during project construction phases in compliance with HBFC Chapter 14, Fire Safety During Construction And Demolition. (FD) b. Fire/Emergency Access And Site Safety shall be maintained during project construction phases in— compliance with City Specification #426, Fire Safety Requirements for Construction Sites. (FD) OTHER: a. Discovery of additional soil contamination or underground pipelines, etc., must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly in compliance with City Specification#431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards. (FD) b. Outside City Consultants The Fire Department review of this project and subsequent plans may require the use of City consultants. The Huntington Beach City Council approved fee schedule allows the Fire Department to recover consultant fees from the applicant, developer or other responsible party. (FD) Fire Department City Specifications may be obtained at: Huntington Beach Fire Department Administrative Office City Hall 2000 Main Street, 51h floor Huntington Beach, CA 92648 or through the City's website at www.surfcity-hb.org If you have any questions, please contact the Fire Prevention Division at (714) 536-5411. S:\Prevention\1-Development\1-Planning Department-Planning Applications,CUP's\2010 CUP's\Newland 21730(Poseidon Desalination)PA# 2 010-1 03-08-10 D M.d o c -417- Item 5. - Page 165 Item S. - Page 166 -418- ih Ul T (D 4 • a-ra ��. „,� � , yy 1 v F ;s x^. \ TF Item 5. - Page 168 -420- -� 'Pb PiaPNdw -" 3r iTLP89°M"atEti°;,2R � I (�" �,� •,� ` ����`r" s .s, � �s f Y € n.,a•;' '$t�°�T,`,fin,:".. .�� �� •� � �,`j '� 9 ,�>4 r :��A:L�G 4}.a+4,e.w4J�•Res .._.,u�� . �. ': a _ Rip 3 _ ,77 •�� sa �.�4WittisTsi• „i •� :,t`vF"� '."'"4;, oil A r. �>�•�Y� -Y`4.trLf`W4C+Y >�'?" ��' .'v"�``"-�n��`<,:,r, l: % ..• , .�..•�,xen � �K .aifD t5C[ .4h' "�Ly k f ¢ SA Z'+ �• . <a. Z g -421- Item 5. - Page 169 rr fD TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 2010- 130 W THFC/7'YOFHUNTINCTONSFACH.COUNTY OF ORANCF,STATFOFCAI!FORMA 777:7. ER Ul SURW If fO -y, Ilk 4"'�' 411 > a�^ awsr +k. _ a 3' a P, �> ✓mac- x v;•'d 'a x s ,. iL E g �ITT :xa'cs�P� .✓. �i. a ,- ,1". v.� a�z�,`- ...r;`: =u, >.,;�.. -#x�r,'i �, '. 4 ...Ec<> .a� ,-,, ._. ..._ .<.::', °,r .a. al^,,a.>,. °`�vss 'g• 5a` .. ... ,.Y•'N<r<.x n .. .� a,x a< ,r ,.ele. 84, % �..� i"...vZa zi "z's _^>z't.Tt " '"aa 'z".-'�t f:., r, s a t. L ,,,,fi�rr ,�- "'*'F ,�� �,. .{.,• ,�<...._ ,+.1 t :< 4 ^ae � PIN 8 n >..,:,, :, r ^w S*x` ,.,x. , ,/ �*^ :Tsl!'✓x. ' n y, m't�xk<n, rd T 'v aX ``S k. ,;gym:b v,.<... r� x � , .ti✓, .. assl(' ;, : ,', UAN t ,7 „- '' N 7 s8 ,;, ✓, L g Y u 5 i S emu^ „ � a c� - ,.,:.:. ,.,, x. •: < .,,'^Y. t € ...i. .n. ., ,:to< ,t.." .- ...,;:. :., � ,.u'a:'<:.. �', afz W is . , < r •�:#. fir,.< a -S. s•� � ark'.:.;'„ a a x ,. , / ... �� 'sr £%S'r � h i 4� ?`! e`����.",ta'•. < s r. EPAx AL <r1 Y ■ `Y�Jz,�:�:a ,ak- w✓ gj Im ni .l:: Yid R.a, szi.ia� r)✓l , L�.o ✓„�§ 4 a k. Ea" ...�. w " '✓ arils E:n ,.� -3 erg, wEc,m„ yr f 3' w.e`•a xz � 4� �`.r y a x� > h. �J. W �F w ,;...i,`{- .;,.>• .: J,,"._.f, ,Fx' ,, " ,,. ._s:�'��#[b s,?,<, -; ,/ ,<:b^ sr= <-r ,>„:.", ^ x. , +. ���f', .as...�;.._ Jkk, 'r?r,i '"'k' e„`s�s, c s � ti° ,gx u 3y j,a a�Z :`:,5 .'?: Car �.. c:'a - .,�., +••<3' i{x,.:. vim.. .r� w�'w n "Sr'a < ROM r k N ■ ■.. ag v ■ <�.;,/ ■v ,■ :,a `<s .tx r ,a z` ,tx `� E' ... =if @, k. f x e. v �£ tw k t fn,"e- �Wf �__tks ' ,xP ,tau JA ,c r, N, .fix. tea'. aP, :rfi.. <a. 'e-. , } k.'•. � F:w: / .>, aka 6. �.`£1 x ,� $fix., ,,f ''d'l>7' � xxg.a r .:. v r+,. ;:; 4 r. t. ,x,«, ,,'Y = ,�., ,,,. rf >..>„• ,, .,,s"a« :✓ ." :' .;", Z„`a', .l. --.fib' vv �' ? �,t `Zn a :.mac. '-•e .,.r.% ,r- 'a�,.>,. �.6. �" � a E � ah sA G S x '�-so 'x "AMR e o. 4. MC w / .•e b. ,ins„ ,,, -,�.. � .. ,,��� ..0 ., ,,.Y�,`..�?.ar.,.a <. _- ..ax,.,a._.�' '�g1e„x�-��_,�i,w�_>�*'T� ,:+. 'b� ,.. «swah„uaz_..�. p.'� e ,�.z,_�,.,s. . -, ,:�,� . fD N e :� a � � '` l'' v � � m � " � � �l�I� �� ' .� �\ � ')�,Y,y�r �� a s���ri�"ll'�� N a.� <. ,.. s � �'. �_.; ;� � �; { � x � � � r � �'. ��' ' �, i I" +� �� �` �� � 3 �� � �� +tea I �_ � � . ,.. ,� � � �: � + _ + ' +�� 0 b t ; �'� � i - t � [ ' fit 1 � � �' ' „,r„:” ,.: ,';� z '',�✓"�,"°�s a`i� �«.,,� a•'::. ,:y`;°y,°. ',,: r.�s.,.„ Syr Yt. ��.% usr <,.; n:x k. :<:.e � «,,� ,�: � s.,< c. �F<• S `s R' ,_x �-9'r^>�•.. - .;"fix.,. �.:n+ �' ce ,�.,. °Fran ,,.,. .af._.. -,,;,.. Y„ .'�� ,: s:,�: „b,, ., ay .:."", v � .�S „�•" x �<"..'�'�. ?::� 1.,. .,,'f✓, E, '.a t M » a w a < milli °,.. , �. :_.'�^ -». „ «s x a„ss, - .,•°mow "' ,« apt �.'., a.;. ., ,a F ., Wta y u 0) ,Iv t.7, d_.gip. ,�. �' .,y 1� `� firrog , s�> „e a> §r �r' jai• '. r. :-_,.. e.. ';,. _ •, ,., ,. a^r ,,,,x._q,ey ....a., f ::':. � ..,x . '9.• k< of �a. --'F 'e'05 �° k z t + _ ti •:: r<�. Al v e« �'F". vv- � £ as ,<..,, .��- °� "' , i '.. %'�:''> %< .a �i`�y'ti/c , �a ; '. ■ gym" <.:. x d a ;,.. 3€s:?- . .,,c : ,.. %`::` r •:'a v, y, ,v ..M� r. ..... ,., ��a;,ti: ,,: a:: ,<:�' 'lsr a r, .^�, ,rv ^., ., .<„ „zr.r _-s E ,� - g ,,. ,h » -- , as �, ,. „ ,1. � •''� Sa ..' ::a: n, ,a ;,e ,.? a`...,,s'v. r , A $.z P f 's, � e „F� .�<"" �... .Az •'«e: �'�`�� ilk sis;. ,.:4t,s`t�- .�;. s« 140 �*..: f'1; aye,., �`#." 3 � �. q r.-�2•. y� ' s re£ r�„4^rz`F 6y W� 3r., z�,�,<t f`s,�. 2 .,x is . 3„ ✓ " - "3,4 '�" :rt HY p s§"d ,j, tag rF +,k"•E' „'�<, ,vS&F L<:. v� � v r p/a,A 3 ,�`MOM"' � C:�:�+^k S 5"t v.l� ' b s k 15 yy y� r^ Y �i ��.,nm Its ;� ,� ,is i..1' s n, s `�� r•• �` tx ' ga„`1 .arm, ,'�'*,m"Yi?. ,'%z,... T . w. tom ,4:`c sr ,t ✓- e '§' ..,'�'::. b� ,��' e_.•x` `,< �»;., .:. ��rY�`xy�`..,.. ». ':..t�;, ,s,Q^�. .xv� <?��- A,a&:'r�,/�'rs: �a.�. _'-�'�' �. ' .� ,3,,: .a�, ,a�'a�«`s�i ..' .�. i,,, �. ,.;. xaw-+, - '" � 'fir ;� >9 re:;•-. � -�, rx f, t �• s �;� �� 3 w ag x , '�•; � ,.v�r., �7�„"F' ti5 r'; t?s°�"s » ,>f> r„9-: a k,;,E. `t ,,<r.,;l ,5..,..-. , .. x•t�:,.. ,., ,;' a ax ° t yt. r� �� ;�---' �Z s ,,;13,-.,, cif,', z�"-c, e' F`:f t�'`G�3 ' �z � 3 `^� - .,S�R �,y r s�`<}? °:i',.z aEH „y wv, .,:,:.. .t;•• ��,d; wx;. E mac:, v:,:' s - �. A sue" t„y � J ;n; "s' � ,;i' rota %�"v � ,.�„ ,.✓�� ''4 4, �.. _,� ^:�' ,�' ,s r- Via, �dt���`s�., ;r eM:r,` � :<^� ■' .-� �r r, . ',�r^� t•`w� 5 „z,•> � ."�' ,.. », 1 ,?a- s� �;�,:: .r fix.. �<,,,3 r.Ev T�i 'wr. S dr.. [�; ,3 b ITVA71.11 insmt-e l Mm im e :�f r / S.. S f; S.Sn Q r„iXl" s yr' t�'r "^ ;�,;. r„�'�'�. „�, 'F`.' ,4� �%'d• 4 �`•l,. x>;���f�" z?r+n H x�•4 ;�?r'f,/r �e� .� F�s� �� �.,*.' � E ,�' s. „? '»£ :t s s ,sue r; k' 8 '?` �, �.,.�.;.� j(> r�. �^t ,�s',e -=J �H $, .G s., =3kd. as.,= ..�.• � z,�. , „T`^ xza:;5:, ,ti''" �.'3;' .'s•y^z�'�' l'3. n,q � ":%u t � �3 �,�„'`S>fm'" ,�"'�<.. , .. ., f Y En ^v o, ii '4 2 �.'•.. ., y,<", ,a >..✓,, <� a. ,5,.m.a - .,,, y.,F ,^a., , 8 °s,j. ,,, .. ,x�<-, ........ ., c .x. � ,n; ,:: 3-. , '.a - , e, ,.," •.- - ,��, "sr `s,,, �..3• U,U_U qn' 1V ,84, F �„ ",A 1.:;?ti ,,:,'Cg �,�F, -"r,.`a'>'n a2/.- i,,�e yam\ .Ks-�=. r'st ® _ dam?'• k ^ f:! 3 �! f';: r Fn s ,, e F a g ff 1)£CMITI ' Ada ,, 3W711,R';>,. k,s ``%'�, �,.... !/ Em, zg•° aL yT... 4S•A n v n i Y - a4", a'. IN y 3 -o Ul ■ ■ lia Iffi : �D 4g,,'^!.�" d�aimnaad� w '; � a ti. r � r <n�olmm.dx• faT 01■ v.'ess.etevalie,n ry PIT WN c.wnm.da.•.m:r.arrxm ''<� �. �.x� .\, r�' "A,t.:.�\,,,,.a��`�. 'w;` ea,t ele%st�u� AN . :, 'YID_ "�':_ '�-..;i�a ?�} ;`46 �At � C` ,,� s *+ a:el mutesSM 73 � s.m�trmva d>« x;'.a _#k�s"' „ ..�. -^d�: a%• 'Y�"` .,CS=. �,,r;�;;�,r;,�,:.; ��'s'.��" _,:, ,..: ?.real man dam y<..,�& .. .✓ _ u �,,,,, ,-, .:"1; a.Mal IyY31'tPB eieJdt.081 ftnisnQs s,a,1 Ids <ala.r 11 ,'�<a , Vac \, ti d a.4>nw:cwa.,,. � '� v`..� rx;��,... .� 1, � ^'et��'� i•I,�k +`� 'r�d E.,�Iran:daa^finnh Jumn� „P �... ..:,. ,,•.,, •';`_ ...__, ;� .... ;' -. •aa rMil q.. south elevation _ tw lipm u east elevation ... z. - _ •.ve,t z€e4atrc�n v - .._ w— M, N, N i MOMS= RL product water storage tax�h pardaL e4evati©n keynotes finishes 1.metal par"di A.C�w I (P C.Cob,3 ;:7.�l� 4.m--W rm�ndoor Cr.qbz*w:POG AxuF4 mm- ftm -4 4 MM —,J ,Ef ----------- a" fD co a. key note- fnishe, 3. "VP t WG i 6.fiW x—t—ol 'LOOR. PLAN /4ag 17—'p, M2-I 9, ......... P T kevmxe5 3Z w east ele eUm e- Or ... ....... Po6t treatm t plant flag plan and evmim =A•% '� a _. ,'' .�.*;� s ;:r ..�;<�...:x _ "' N ';?'3 '� G` f;� "-ry'�:,..,....: .',, s ,y, o,.•� .;,,, 'r `";l -."�""�' v.::,: �"s� -?"`a• ,as :--�v �,,..:r x•sa,.Y,:ti �> � :�.: J� kp. ,.�" � ,r ,st 8,5 �, "��'=r c,�.� �r<.�„ .. ..,S.,.s.F' 'T:.'w=t- �.,,...,..W, aY J £�`. •,' „r .. ...-.: .. . ,:_.., u" p'.x„ .,5.. �': P '� '.s�rl <.5.-,'. 4: R �v�,� �. uc.,•..., � , _ ,.,,s ,; ;�-,; " «.. '?�° /O" ,-s f .vti'� Via» ,k s:4'.;%.,�.% 6r•,.,, �,^,.. " , ,f....,»a,,,.., ., rv, a,...'�,»,w .:,:... n.l., r. ,;.�.. h'v'._ v' 'D'ry`�"� u,,. ,�z.. s, > < 3sg y_ 5 r a,J»..r :>`,... k .nl. ,,,{.. I' 1y„ "�.. f sv,.�.ry s$R ."�, •,<l>.' 3T< >.a,2 Y ^y,;,. 4,. -.., S•<„ a"^ J' ';. ..-a;,<...„ .v?;"5 ,3:`.:, ...... .... .......T.ry � ,:'. ,. xsf.-L nG"� r �", � 9> -.-� L ., * `3 ,{< a"F^ ,f3i `:t>;N•' k, ,sAA"m, „//%.'£'� ,3r> �, F n�� .. z.> %tc�"..d " ,, „. _::, x, '?i.Y„w„> a :..,:.,. d4�_.>.. -.,.,_, Gd ,,. ,„•� f".,2A".,. �...a1.§'... -r 't✓'"N s.�.., .row, a < r,a,•... �. : ,nAv., . „s:- ;.:,..fix.,^. i, >,.. xs a °::i, =:s z.^ a r 6, .Ya E;: ,f^i.a Lxa iL ..�. 'SS <.� S�' �,bG"'" ,?'.E r ^':55' vi. � S`� -3� -: sr.'H`2y#��"Y,� , ", > n.. s"`^ #n •a.a,..,. �:a 3 t ✓ 1 � G a.k r Gv5 } 64. , " k mg ;\a°u.. .,iS 'x,'*i',:� �„`r%s d�si'+a�va'.z::. ✓ .�F,,., .� , : "�s�.'3' 9 d59 .V°c. :^�' N` •o.� t .,.G"k5N' <M< ��,a 'S a ar�r,r4is� .a�-: �,;, .v ,u .■m , ,",%;„. '. � " ,: Y = F>..s R^ v x � ��" AP t$ `"�F, � SS'" i aK;! ..L.s,.av: :•fie ,�, r e� i' ;.`�' > �� � � mp(:'r�� � ' -x .-c Y S , . ., ': .� Ys:, ,. ,r, c ,: '., {n■/4.. .. .Y •� ^ _ �;.. �4.v. ":. ■. L'�F, 4.:s ,. n' .:.. ':, ■ '� of A :._� 5 k i..,, a ,.,',vata � :a,+- _. ✓ Sv....,, ...,, .....xa� <.,, :. ,..::: �'.,•<,s �`? H;�G� :<. ON i4�t, 241 , _ a 4 2 C � g t"n. 3.. ■. 3;>. ■ t.;'f ..mod. a�F. a, ■■ram, yy \v 5 u f.<"... s..z ">i'. Y-� ✓^ .`'fri .,.>p `� e � r�C g �v. N r/ r F .E , r!.. a.Y'°x5' , .t ... £�, 9 -, ¢,. �� .a 3- � ,.<. ,e _.. s4 ,,, e. � ,... ;. �t '�T.. , :. r »r ;. ry. . <ru< z^ Y. F E,r yy Sw Y�n .'� 4, x �;" �'�','' k OR ���., sax, ti.�: r G .:'x4'' m ?!, m s.- Er::: ..vv��.�✓': "9.. cv �'�s R%F 6 4 4 f ran S� Y r , MR wt n ti +s a.• Ski: a `z, :" fls ,.s ,ae s ;, All r �, '>; -,-:� d r d`�sn.,✓G'- �> r,„=., .e' ,� a;#4. ,Y: L»�m .,vg a� E �« rflF.r Sdo, "FF'3' oZ," imr, w a �> ,,:.. :,, r, r9 _ ''>4 ✓z'». �=,F� Y, v Z k u ram. .,:- may„ =42- Mll gm Inw- I'm rr a 1,5 NO ZE Jt rovve s'll MW W., Trz as mi M 0 6 0,10,-,"' 1 W 4 �mvg, RL" A -433- Item 5. - Page 181 ®� CITY of HUNTINGTON BEACH Inter-Department Communication �— Planning and Building Department TO: Honorable Mayor and City dcuuncil Members VIA: Fred Wilson, City Admini FROM: Scott Hess,AICP, Directo off and Buildi4l DATE: September 7, 2010 SUBJECT: POSEIDON LATE COMMUNICATION Based on communication from Coastal Commission staff(Attachment No. 5), city staff has determined that the new Poseidon project proposal and accompanying Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 10-130 currently in process with the city require a new Coastal Development Permit (CDP) that will be scheduled for a separate City Council public hearing on September 20, 2010. Poseidon concurs and has submitted a letter regarding the CDP (Attachment No. 6). Therefore, staff has made changes to the Recommended Action (see below) and associated attachments to the Request for Council Action to reflect that Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) No. 10-001 will only be an amendment to the approved Conditional Use Permit No. 02- 04, and the CDP and TPM will not be acted on at this meeting. The revised motion and pages for City Council's consideration are attached as follows: Item No. 4-1 on the City Council Agenda - SEIR No. 10-001: ATTACHMENT NO. 1 -Three errata pages added to the Final SEIR No. 10-001 Item No. 4-2 on the City Council Agenda - EPA No. 10-001: REVISED Recommended Action: Motion to: a) "Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 to permit the Seawater Desalination Project with revised staff recommended findings and conditions of approval; and" b) "Approve revised CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts with a Statement of Overriding Considerations." c) "Continue Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 to the September 20, 2010 meeting." ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - Revised Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval for Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 removing the findings for the TPM and CDP and with a change to condition no. 18; and ATTACHMENT NO. 3 - Revised CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts with Statement of Overriding Considerations changing two pages. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 - Revised powerpoint presentation. SH:MBB:RR:jr xc: Joan Flynn, City Clerk; Bob Hall, Deputy City Administrator; Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager; Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner; Jan Richards, Administrative Assistant; Cathy Fikes, Administrative Assistant G:\AdmLtr\2010\090710RR4(Poseidon Late Comm).doc 61— /0 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach 1.0 Executive Summary Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 1 .0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 INTRODUCTION The City of Huntington Beach (City) is preparing this Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) as the lead agency pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public. Resources Code 21000 et seq.)and the state CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et seq.)to evaluate the environmental effects of the proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach.This is an SEIR because the City,as lead agency,has determined that changes to the project and circumstances surrounding the project have occurred, and that new information has become available since the City certified the Final Recirculated Environmental Impact Report(RE1R)for the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach on September 6, 2005 (2005 REIR). Specifically, this SEIR analyzes the project proposal of Poseidon Resources, LLC(Poseidon), which has submitted the following to the City for review and approval: (1) An Entitlement Plan Amendment application (No. 10-001) to amend the conditional use permit(CUP No.02-04)and coastal development permit(CDP No.02-05),or application for a new coastal development permit, application to obtain approval to construct and operate an approximately 50-million-gallon-per-day (mgd) Huntington Beach Desalination Facility and other appurtenant and ancillary water and support facilities to produce potable water (2) Plans to obtain approval to construct water conveyance facilities in the cities of Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa, Irvine and Newport Beach in order to deliver drinking water to the regional distribution system serving residents and businesses in Orange County. This SEIR analyzes all components of the project,including the water conveyance facilities located outside Huntington Beach. The City of Huntington Beach does not have permit jurisdiction over project components located outside its boundaries. Agencies other than the City of Huntington Beach will use this SEIR when making a decision on aspects of the project that requires their approval. More information on agencies expected to use this SEIR may be found in Section 2.0, Introduction and Purpose. 1.2 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this SEIR is to assess and disclose potential impacts to the physical environment associated with construction and operation of the proposed project. This document provides relevant information for consideration by decision makers and the general public. More information on this SEIR, including details about its preparation, may be found in Section 2.0, Introduction. The overall objective of the project is to provide Orange County with a long-term, reliable, high- quality,and local source of potable water. Project implementation would create a local drought-proof supply of domestic water and could reduce Orange County's dependence on imported water, consistent with the goal of integrated water resource management.A key advantage of the selected site is to utilize existing ocean intake/discharge lines of sufficient seawater volume to avoid the impact of constructing new ocean intake/discharge facilities. The specific objectives related to the desalination facility and associated facilities and the land use applications throu h w Wh re t processed include the following: �' � W. City of Huntington Beach 1-1 May 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach 3.0 Project Description Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 3.4 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project consists of construction of a seawater desalination facility to provide a local, drought proof source of potable water to the subscribed water agencies in Orange County. The proposed desalination project would consist of seawater intake system, pretreatment facilities, a seawater desalination facility utilizing reverse osmosis (RO) technology, post-treatment facilities, product water storage, on- and off-site landscaping, chemical storage, on- and off-site booster pump stations, and 48- to 54-inch diameter product water transmission pipelines. This section presents an overall description of the proposed project by summarizing six basic project characteristics associated with the desalination facility: on-site improvements, the proposed desalination facility's association with HBGS, off-site improvements, desalinated water distribution facilities, quality of potable water produced by the desalination facility, and facility operations. The proposed project consists of an Entitlement Plan Amendment(No.10-001) to amend the CUP and CDP that were approved in 2006, or issuance of a new CDP. The project also includes a Design Review Application (No. 10-004) and a parcel map to facilitate development of a desalination facility. A. ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The proposed project involves the implementation of a desalination facility producing approximately 50 MGD, or 56,000 acre-feet per year (afy) of potable water. The project would require the demolition of three fuel storage tanks and the remediation of any soil/groundwater impacted by contamination associated with previous site usage as a fuel storage facility. In addition, the existing berms interior to the project site would be demolished while the existing berms on the exterior perimeter of the site would remain as is. On-site structures would consist of an administration building, a reverse osmosis facility building, pretreatment filter structure, solids handling building, post treatment structure, chemical storage structure , product water pump station and surge tank, flush tank, ammonia tank, fluoride tank, influent pump station, a 66 kV substation and associated connections to existing electrical transmission lines, electrical building, an aboveground product water tank, and appurtenant facilities (refer to Figure 3-6, Conceptual Site Plan). Proposed Buildings and Structures All proposed buildings and structures would comply with state and local standards in regards to fire and structural safety. The proposed desalination project would consist of the following buildings and structures: • Administration Building (approximately 100 feet long x 50 feet wide x 15 feet high; 5,000 square feet): This building is proposed to be Type-II, non-rated (generally defined by the California Building Code as structures incorporating non-combustible materials [steel, iron, concrete, or masonry] for structural elements, floors, walls, and roofs) and would be constructed of steel. The exterior would feature flat metal wall panels running vertically along the face of the structure. A metal panel roof system would be screened with a metal fascia using deep-ribbed metal panels running horizontally, and the roof will be fitted with photovoltaic solar panels. All glazing would be tinted and would include clear anodized window frames (refer to Figure 3-7, Administration Building Plan/Exterior Elevations). City of Huntington Beach 3-17 1 AT TA. �i O �0. i Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach4.1 Land Use/Relevant Planning Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report LAND USE As noted above, Poseidon has pursued the development of the site as a seawater desalination facility since 1999. The City of Huntington Beach approved the project's conditional use permit and coastal development permit on February 27, 2006. The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach has been revised and is fully described in Section 3.0 of this SEIR. The applicant has submitted an application to the City of Huntington Beach for approval of an amended coastal development permit, or a new coastal development permit, and conditional use permit that would replace the previous approvals. From a land use perspective, however, the project would not substantially change from the approved project. In connection with the previous approvals, the City found that the proposed project was consistent with the City's general plan, zoning and certified LCP (Broeren 2007). The project proposes to implement a seawater desalination facility and associated improvements, including a 66-kilovolt substation, on a site surrounded by industrial uses. Residential uses are situated in the site vicinity; the nearest residential use is located approximately 500 feet west of the subject site. The project has the potential to create impacts with regards to air quality, noise, aesthetics, hazards and hazardous materials, and short-term construction impacts (addressed in the corresponding SEIR sections). However, the proposed desalination facility would be consistent with the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, LCP, and Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, and will be subject to discretionary review and conditions of approval as part of the City's conditional use permit and coastal development permit process. In addition, the proposed project would replace dilapidated fuel oil storage tanks with a desalination facility and aboveground product water storage tank, which would improve the site's aesthetic character. The existing site does not provide coastal access, and the proposed desalination facility does not interfere or limit public access to the coast. The project does not affect the visual elements of the coastal environment. The proposed facilities are shorter than the existing structures that will be removed. The City's Design Review Board has approved the design of the previously approved project, including all landscaping. However, because of the proposed changes in site and building configuration, the project will require additional consideration and approval from the Design Review Board. The treatment facilities are located inside an existing industrial site and will be buffered by the approved landscaping. The HBGS and any modifications to that use are subject to review and approval by the California Energy Commission (CEC). As evidenced by the following statement, the CEC is aware of the proposed project and its relationship to the HBGS: "AES (as the land owner) and Poseidon have filed for a Conditional Use Permit with the City of Huntington Beach to construct and operate a water desalination facility on a portion of the 53-acre site. Any land use impacts generated by the desalination facility would be identified and evaluated in the City's environmental analysis" (CEC 2001, p. 14). With implementation of standard construction measures and recommended mitigation measures throughout the SEIR, there are no anticipated significant land use impacts associated with short- term construction/remediation activities or long-term facility operation. The proposed pipeline alignment and underground pump station are adjacent to a variety of land uses, including residential, open space, commercial, educational, medical, and recreational. However, the pipelines City of Huntington Beach 4.1-19 May 2010 ATTACHMENT NO. �.3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL—ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10- 001 (AMENDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 02-04): 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 approved by City Council in 2006 that allowed the construction and operation of a seawater desalination project by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The proposed project for the establishment,maintenance and operation of a seawater desalination project producing 50 million gallons of potable water per day which includes a 5,000 square foot administration building, 34,727 square foot reverse osmosis building,49,481 square foot product water storage tank(30 foot high), other related accessory structures; perimeter landscaping and fencing along the project's frontage on Newland Street and Edison Avenue; and up to four miles of water transmission lines for the primary route; and optional water transmission line routes that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The project will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks to be replaced with one 30 foot high water storage tank and lower profile and modern structures with a more attractive design consistent with the city's adopted Design Guidelines. The project will further enhance the appearance of the area with the installation of 10 to 20 feet of landscaping and an eight- foot high block wall along the Edison and Newland street frontages respectively to provide additional screening and a consistent and upgraded appearance in contrast to the existing improvements. The proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses. However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts. 2. The Entitlement Plan Amendment will be compatible with surrounding uses because the project as proposed and modified by the conditions imposed and code requirements is compatible with the properties immediately surrounding it which are primarily industrial in nature. Additionally, significant setbacks including Newland Street to the west, Edison Avenue to the north, the flood control channel to the east, an existing earthen berm, 10 to 20 feet of landscaping and an eight foot high block wall along the project's Edison and Newland street frontages provide additional screening from surrounding uses. Impacts pertaining to noise, light/glare, odors, and use of chemicals are also addressed to make the project compatible. The proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses. However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts. 3. The proposed seawater desalination project including a 5,000 square foot administration building, 34,727 square foot reverse osmosis building, 49,481 square foot product water storage tank, other miscellaneous accessory structures; perimeter landscaping and fencing along the project's frontage on Newland Street and Edison Avenue; and up to four miles of 48-54 inch water transmission lines Attachment No_2.1 within the city for the primary route; and optional water transmission line routes that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The project as proposed and modified by the conditions of approval is consistent with the PS-O-CZ (Public-Semipublic—Oil Production Overlay—Coastal Zone Overlay) zoning district, and meets or exceeds the minimum development standards set forth therein, and is allowed subject to approval of a conditional use permit and coastal development permit. The proposed desalination facility, which will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities. 4. The granting of the Entitlement Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public)on the subject property because it will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, and it is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities. The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan including,without limitation, the following goals and policies: a. Policy LU 4.1.1 (page II-LU-20): Require adherence to or consideration of the policies prescribed for Design and Development in this Plan, as appropriate. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable policies related to Design and Development. b. Policy LU 4.1.2 (page lI-LU-20): Require that an appropriate landscape plan be submitted and implemented for development projects subject to discretionary review. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to submit and implement a landscape plan. c. Policy LU 4.1.6 (page II-LU-20): Require that commercial and industrial development incorporate adequate drought-conscious irrigation systems and maintain the health of the landscape. The project is consistent with this policy because the landscape plan includes drought-conscious irrigation systems. d. Policy LU 4.2.1 (page II-LU-20): Require that all structures be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City's building and other pertinent codes and regulations; including new, adaptively re-used, and renovated buildings. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable requirements related to building codes and regulations. e. Policy LU 4.2.4 (page II-LU-20): Require that all development be designed to provide adequate space for access, parking, supporting functions, open space, and other pertinent elements. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable policies and requirements related to access, parking, supporting functions and open space. Attachment No.2.2 f. Policy LU 4.2.5 (page II-LU-20): Require that all commercial, industrial, and public development incorporate appropriate design elements to facilitate access and use as required by state and federal laws such as the American's with Disabilities Act. The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable policies and requirements related to accessibility. g. Policy LU 5.1.1 (page II-LU-21): Require that development protect environmental resources by consideration of the policies and standards contained in the Environmental Resources/Conservation Element of the General Plan and federal (NEPA) and state (CEQA) regulations. During the development review, process: (a) Review any development proposal for the Bolsa Chica area, Huntington Beach wetlands, and throughout the City to ensure that no development is permitted in federally delineated wetlands; and (b) Review any development proposed for non-wetland areas to ensure that appropriate setbacks and buffers are maintained between development and environmentally sensitive areas to protect habitat quality. The project is consistent with this policy because it does not propose any development in or adjacent to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitats, and provides for all required setbacks and buffers. h. Policy LU 7.1.1 (page II-LU-22): Accommodate existing uses and new development in accordance with the Land Use and Density Schedules. The project is consistent with this policy because it is consistent with the General Plan Land Use and Density Schedules. i. Policy LU 7.1.2 (page I1-LU-22): Require that development be designed to account for the unique characteristics of project sites and objectives for community character and in accordance with the Development"Overlay" Schedule (Table LU-3) as appropriate. The project is consistent with this policy because it is proposed on a site that is already developed and is integrated into the site. Pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas. j. Policy LU 7.1.5 (page II-LU-22): Accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that maintain the City's fiscal viability and integrity of environmental resources. The project is consistent with this policy because it proposes redevelopment on underutilized land for productive economic use. k. Policy LU 13.1.8 (page II-LU-43): Ensure that the City's public buildings, sites, and infrastructure improvements are designed to be compatible!in scale, mass, character, and architecture with existing buildings and pertinent design characteristics prescribed by this General Plan for the district or neighborhood in which they are located, and work with non-City public agencies to encourage compliance. Attachment No.2.3 The project is consistent with this policy because the project will be an improvement by demolishing three 40 foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. 1. Policy UD 2.1.1 (Page II-UD-27): Require that new development be designed to consider coastal views in its massing,height, and site orientation. The project is consistent with this policy because the project plans include a number of measures to minimize adverse visual effects of the proposed facility. The facility would be comprised of relatively low profile buildings reaching approximately 35 feet above the existing grade, which would comply with applicable zoning code height restrictions of 50 feet. The overall appearance would be similar to a commercial office building. As part of the facility design, both vegetative and architectural screening has been added to ensure that exposed pipelines, tanks, and other utility-type equipment are screened from public view. The project would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect existing public views to and along the-ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. In addition, the project would replace three existing dilapidated fuel oil storage tanks with contemporary structures, which would improve the site's aesthetic character and result in a beneficial impact. in. Policy CE 7 (Page III-CE-26): Maintain and enhance the visual quality and scenic views along designated corridors. The project is consistent with this policy because there are limited views across the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) site due to the height of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished. n. Policy ERC 4.1.5 (Page IV-ERC-25): Promote the preservation of public view corridors to the ocean and the waterfront through strict application of local ordinances, design guidelines and related planning efforts, including defined view corridors. The project is consistent with this policy because it would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. o. Policy AQ 1.8.2 (Page IV-AQ-15): Require installation of temporary construction facilities (such as wheel washers) and implementation of construction practices that minimize dirt and soil transfer onto public roadways. The project is consistent with this policy because it is subject to mitigation measures that control dispersal of soil as a result of construction activities. Attachment No.2.4 p. Policy EH 1.2.1 (Page V-EH-24): Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand ground shaking and liquefaction such as stated in the Uniform Building Code(UBC). The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all appropriate and applicable building standards related to ground shaking and liquefaction. q. Policy N 1.2.2 (Page V-N-6): Require new industrial and new commercial land uses or the major expansion of existing land uses to demonstrate that the new or expanded use would not be directly responsible for causing ambient noise levels to exceed an exterior Ldn of 70 dB(A) on areas containing"noise sensitive"land uses as depicted on Figure N-1. The project is consistent with this policy because it will be required to adhere to all applicable noise restrictions established by the City. r. Policy HM 1.1.4 (Page V-HM-7): Implement federal, state, and local regulations for the handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. The project is consistent with this policy because it includes appropriate and adequate controls for the handling, storage, and use of hazardous materials. The project will be an improvement to the area because it will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks. The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines. There are limited views across the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) site due to the height of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished. The project is required to provide a 10 foot(Edison) and 20 foot (Newland) landscape planter along the perimeter of the site to enhance the appearance of the area. These landscaping improvements are required to be consistent with the approved landscaping improvements for the rest of the HBGS property to the south for a cohesive appearance. The proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses. However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10- 001: 1. The site plans, floor plans, elevations, and landscaping plan received and dated August 12, 2010 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The landscape area on the east side of the project site on Parcel 3 shall include the removal of all Myoporum, and shall be planted with a palette of plants indigenous to the Southern California coastal community. b. Provide a patio along the front entrance of the administration building. (DRB) c. Provide landscape planters around the administration building. (DRB) Attachment No.2.5 d. Provide screening for the solids loading area and filter substation compatible with the project. (DRB) e. Provide screening to the top of the chemical storage, carbon dioxide, and flush tanks. (DR B) f. The landscaping plan shall reflect plant materials that are more mature than the minimum code requirements subject to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. (DRIB) g. The applicant shall install landscaping on Parcel 2 along Newland and Edison to match the project for a consistent appearance. h. The landscaping and wall plan shall be consistent in design, colors, and materials with the landscaping and wall plan for AES for a cohesive appearance. i. The landscaping along the Newland and Edison lease area street frontages shall include the densest type and number of trees to provide the most effective screening possible and shall be maintained to the approval of the City Landscape Architect. j. A perimeter block wall shall be constructed along the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility/Poseidon boundary, per Public Works Department requirements. (PW) k. Buildings of the subject project may not cross property lines. Lot lines shall be adjusted at the proposed treatment facility accordingly. (PW) 1. Revise 36"-42" City Pipeline Stub to 18"-36" City Pipeline Stub. (PW) in. Tree species planted along Edison Street shall not canopy over the street to avoid blocking large maintenance vehicles accessing the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility. (CS) 2. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the following shall be completed: For the demolition of the three(3) 200 foot diameter fuel oil tanks, a work plan must be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to commencement of work. (FD) 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall submit written proof of final project approval by each applicable regulating agency including but not limited to the California Coastal Commission, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District and all applicable water agencies and cities. b. The required Precise Grading Plan shall include the following (PW) 1) Extension of the existing 8-inch diameter City sewer main in Edison Avenue easterly to the terminus of said street. Attachment No.2.6 2) Connection to the existing 8-inch sewer main along the adjacent property's northerly property line (also southerly of the existing Orange County Flood Control District's right-of-way) shall be prohibited. c. Prior to issuance of any permit,the applicant will enter into a Franchise agreement approved and executed by the City for the generation and transport of product water from the site, and through and across the city's streets,rights-of-way or properties. (PW) (MC 3.44) d. A separate(new) irrigation water service and meter installed per Water Division Standards, and sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the landscape irrigation demand and the Water Efficient Landscape Requirements (MC 14.52) the minimum size shall be I". (PW) e. The proposed 30"tank overflow line shall be prohibited from surface discharging directly into the public right-of-way. (PW) f. Areas for containment shall be provided to mitigate possible spillage of any materials affecting storm water quality that may be stored on-site, and to protect the adjacent wetlands to the maximum extent feasible. (PW) 4. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical,mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. A Water Purchase Agreement shall be executed between the applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project and the City of Huntington Beach and shall incorporate the following: (PW) 1) The City will have the option (the"Option") to enter into a water purchase agreement ("Water Purchase Agreement") to purchase water from the Project on terms essentially the same as all of the other water purchase agreements for the Project; provided, however that the City's price for up to 3,360 acre-feet per year(3 million gallons per day or 4.6 cubic feet per second) of the water purchased from the Project will be equal to the combination of(1) a 5%discount on the purchase price of water supplied by MWD via the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and (2) any subsidy received by the City from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California or any other third party for the purchase of water from the Project such as, but not limited to, MWDOC; and provided further that the City's price will not exceed the purchase price for Project water in the other water purchase agreements for the Project. 2) The City will have the first right to purchase up to an additional 4,000,000 gallons per day(6.1 CFS) of additional water from the Project during a declared water emergency at the same costs as above for not to exceed seven days in any 30 day period and not to exceed 28,000,000 gallons in any one emergency event.. The definition of a declared water emergency is a 50% or greater loss of overall City water supply(not including droughts) or connected facilities such Attachment No. 2.7 as distribution system, booster stations, reservoirs, wells and imported connections causing a reduction of at least 50%of the City's water supply. c. The applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project will enter into an Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) approved and executed by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach. (EDD) 5. The structures cannot be occupied, the final building permits cannot be approved,utilities cannot be released, the use cannot commence, and the Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued until the following has been completed: The applicant shall demonstrate that all measures required by these conditions to protect the nearby wetlands have been implemented. 6. During demolition, remediation, grading, site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Construction equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. b. Use low sulfur(0.5%)diesel fuel by weight in all diesel equipment. c. Shut off engines when not in use. d. Attempt to phase and schedule activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts. e. Discontinue operation during second stage smog alerts. f. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. g. Discovery of additional contamination/pipelines, etc. must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly. (FD) 7. The applicant shall completely remove the storage tanks from the site within 12 months from the date of approval of City building permits and agreements. 8. No parking shall be permitted on the south side of Edison Ave. (PW) 9. With the development of the proposed Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Facility, the applicant/operator of the project will deliver potable water to the City from a location within the project site, specifically the proposed Tank Storage site. The applicant/operator of the project shall provide a water pipeline from the tank storage site, a bypass water pipeline and located within the booster pump station, two pump cans including base plates, baffles, steal discharge heads, and suction manifolds per City requirements and specification. (PW) 10. The applicant shall keep the facility under video surveillance 24 hours per day every day. Videos should be saved for at least 30 days to provide Police with the recording.(PD) Attachment No.2.8 11. Post clear signage describing the acceptable behavior allowed and uses of the facility. Signs should also make it clear that there is 24/7 video surveillance.(PD) 12. The administration building should be clearly marked to help visitors.(PD) 13. The entire facility should be lighted throughout all hours of darkness, but must conform to the lighting requirements of Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001.(PD) 14. The project shall comply with the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 10-001. 15. The Planning and Building Department Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning and Building Department Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning and Building Department Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the City Council may be required pursuant to the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. 16. The applicant and applicant's representatives shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for review and approval. 17. The applicant/property owner and each successor in interest to the property which is the subject of this project shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack,'set aside, void or annul any approval of the City, City Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in the defense thereof 18. Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001 which amends Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 and Coastal Development no,•,n:t No 02 05 shall become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of final approval by the City Council of Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130, or within two years of the date of final Coastal Development Permit approval by the Coastal Commission if the Coastal Development Permit is appealed, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning and Building Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. Attachment No_2.9 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (1) Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10-001, which Amends Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04, and Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05— or which would result in issuance of a new Coastal Development Permit. (2) Tentative Parcel Map No. 10-130 (3) A Franchise Agreement between the City and Poseidon, including plans to obtain approval to construct water conveyance pipelines and appurtenant facilities in the City of Huntington Beach in order to deliver drinking water to the regional distribution system serving residents and businesses in Orange County. (4) A Tank Site Exchange Agreement and Lease between the City and Poseidon (5) An Owner Participation Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon The SEIR analyzes all components of the project, including water conveyance facilities located outside Huntington Beach. The City of Huntington Beach does not have permit jurisdiction over project components located outside its boundaries. Agencies other than the City of Huntington Beach will use the SEIR when making a decision on aspects of the project that requires their approval. More information on agencies expected to use the SEIR may be found in Section 2.0, Introduction and Purpose. The SEIR was circulated for public review and comment as specified in the State CEQA. Guidelines. Public comments were received by the City and have been responded to by the City in accordance with CEQA requirements. The City of Huntington Beach determined that the SEIR, comprised of the SEIR, a list of persons, organizations and public agencies commenting on the SEIR, comments received from the public and interested agencies, the Responses to Comments prepared by the City(including Errata to the SEIR), and all attachments and documents incorporated by reference is complete and adequate, and has been prepared in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The SEIR identified certain significant effects on the environment that may occur if the project is approved or carried out. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA, the City of Huntington Beach adopts this Statement of Findings of Facts and makes one or more of the three Section 21081 findings for each significant impact identified. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. However, unavoidable significant impacts related to both direct and cumulative impacts on short-term construction-related air quality emissions would remain as a consequence of the project, despite the incorporation of all feasible mitigation. In addition, for significant effects related to indirect growth outside of the boundaries of Orange County that may occur remain unmitigated. Where the decision of a public agency allows the occurrence of a significant effect, which is identified in the SEIR but is not avoided, the agency must state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the SEIR and other information in the administrative record. Such a statement is called a Statement of Overriding Considerations. In accordance with CEQA, therefore, the City of Huntington Beach adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations included as Section 7.0 of this Statement of Findings of Facts. ATTACHMENT NO. 3, , City of Huntington Beach , August, 2010 Page 2 of 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Finding for Off Site Pipelines and Underground Pump Stations The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach off site pipelines and underground pump stations will not result in significant impacts related to geology, soils and seismicity. Less than significant impact. In addition, applicable mitigation measures contained within Section 4.9 of the SEIR, inclusive, further reduce these less than significant impacts. Facts in Support of Finding Based on the analysis presented in Section 4.2 of the SEIR, impacts to off site pipelines and underground pump stations will not result in significant impacts related to geology, soils and seismicity. The proposed product water delivery pipelines are not anticipated to result in significant impacts in regard to geology and soils, because the majority of the alignment would occur within existing street ROW and various utility lines that currently exist along the alignment. Pipeline construction would be subject to standard erosion control measures similar to those implemented for the desalination facility site to contain any potential wind and water erosion on site. Because the pipeline alignments being considered are relatively flat and have been graded, impacts to natural topography are not anticipated. A design-level geotechnical investigation would be performed for the selected pipeline alignment to examine the potential for earthquake shaking hazards, surface rupture, shallow groundwater, and unstable soils (liquefaction, subsidence, lateral spread). Should the potential for such geological hazards exist, adequate mitigation for both pipeline construction and pipeline design would be incorporated to mitigate impacts in this regard to a less than significant level. Also refer to Section 4.9, Construction- Related Impacts, of this SEIR for a more detailed evaluation of pipeline construction. Construction of the proposed pump stations would also be subject to standard erosion control measures as required by local, state, and federal regulations to contain any potential wind and water erosion on site. The sites are relatively flat and limited in area, thus impacts to the natural topography of the site and surrounding vicinity are, not anticipated. A design-level, site-specific geotechnical study would be prepared for any underground pump station and would incorporate adequate mitigation measures (if deemed necessary) for geologic hazards such as seismic shaking, surface rupture, shallow groundwater, liquefaction, subsidence, lateral spread, and landslides. Because any underground pump stations would require excavation to a depth of approximately 40 feet, lateral bracing for the sides of the chamber may be necessary because the site is in a designated liquefaction hazard zone (California Geological Survey 2001). Refer to Section 4.9, Construction-Related Impacts, of this SEIR for a more detailed evaluation of pump-station construction. A-:C. IMPACTS RELATED TO HYDROLOGY, DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER RUNOFF (SEIR pages 4.3-1 to 4.3-14) Section 4.3 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential long-term impacts related to hydrology and water quality. As the proposed off site pipeline alignment and underground pump stations would be subsurface, there are no anticipated long-term impacts in regard to hydrology, drainage, and/or water quality. A discussion of short-term, construction-related impacts in regard to hydrology and water quality is included under Construction-Related Impacts. The remaining topics are addressed in Section 4.0-C of this Statement of Findings of Facts. ATTAR T N®. ;?f' 2' City of Huntington Beach August, 2010 Page 6 of 82 PRMOTJVFT L t Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) • 13-acre property I behind HB No. 10-001 Generating Station(HBGS) at Newland St. Poseidon Seawatei and Edison St. Desalination Projec Includes water transmission lines to Costa Mesa and north. • EPA to amend CUP , 02-04 approved by City Council in 2006 Revised plans reflect: allowing project_ � ��_; �' • Project sited north of previously approved location. • Project now incorporates adjacent city tank site in addition to HBGS property to create+8.6 acre parcel. • Revising approved „ - New 30 ft.tall water storage tank still on corner of location,site layout, `A Newland and Edison replacing existing 40 ft.tail -xsy _ xt floor plans,and ,6 tank. x� � building elevations. h z� - `i • Project architectural design slightly changed but _ comparable to prior approval. s _., • Revised height and size(still in compliance with code). A�TTFHINI T O, P-M O,l E CTDESOM Revised proposal includes: ANALYSIS • Up to 10 miles of water transmission lines in HB and Conforms to General Plan land use and zoning Costa Mesa. designations. • Includes optional routes and pump stations to convey • Conforms to General Plan/Coastal Element goals, water northerly. policies,and objectives. • Taking screened seawater from HBGS(co-located)and Meets or exceeds all development standards. pumping seawater as stand alone facility in case HBGS . Conforms to Urban Design Guidelines. stops using once through cooling. • Demolition of three 40 foot high storage tanks. fi o..- _ -- ANALYSIS ANALYSIS Land Use Compatibility Aesthetics Still compatible with uses on-site and immediately • improves appearance by removing three 40 foot high surrounding project. fuel storage tanks. • North—industrial • Amended structures still lower in profile,modern,and more attractive. - East—channel,ASCON,tank farm Includes 10 to 20 foot landscape planter along South—HBGS Newland and Edison frontage. - West—Newland St,vacant Design Review Board recommends approval. • Significant setbacks provided(+200 to+1,300 ft.)to residential. AT 1AGHMtNT NCB. '� Z' 2 rug, e"r sm� 0111 s"i.B I dgs. PAY-- mw V ON rl 1- WT, RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of EPA because: Project is compatible with surrounding uses. • Adequate buffering from residential and other sensitive uses is provided. F 11 1=1 , Project will improve appearance of the area. Consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations for the site. ATTACHMENT NO. RECOMMENDATION Statement of Overriding Considerations(SOC): • City Council may approve project with SOC even if short- term construction emissions and growth inducement impacts outside of Orange County cannot be mitigated/avoided. • Project's social,economic,and ecosystem/bio resources benefits outweigh these two impacts. • City Council may consider these impacts acceptable and approve project with SOC. ATIf TACHMENT NO. `- 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT, SUITE 2000 SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94105-2219 ..� VOICE(415)904-5200 FAX (415)904-5400 TDD(415)597-5815 September 2, 2010 Ms. Mary Beth Broeren,Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Re: City of Huntington Beach Coastal Development Permit(CDP)02-05—Poseidon Resources Dear Ms. Broeren: Thank you for your inquiry earlier this week regarding the proper procedures for the City of Huntington Beach(City)to modify its approval of the proposed Poseidon desalination facility. We understand from the City's Notice of Public Hearing that the City Council will consider taking an action next week to amend CDP 02-05 for Poseidon's proposed desalination plant. As we discussed on the phone yesterday, because the City's original approval of that CDP was appealed to the California Coastal Commission(Commission), that appeal has stayed the operation and effect of the City's approved CDP (see California Public Resources Code section 30623 and Chapter 14 California Code of Regulations section 13112). As a result of the City's approval being stayed,the City cannot amend the CDP. In addition, the Commission has already determined that the City's original approval of CDP 02-05 raises a substantial issue with respect to its conformance with the City's certified LCP. The Commission will therefore consider the project de novo and either deny the project or issue a new permit. Under either scenario,the City's approval of CDP 02-05 will no longer be valid. Thus, practically, there is no longer any reason for the City to amend the CDP. To address the recent proposed project changes, including new development such as the proposed subdivision that was not part of the original CDP,we recommend that the City rescind its original approved CDP (thus making the appeal to the Commission null and void)and then make a decision on a new CDP,which might then be appealed to the Commission. This would- allow the City to incorporate the complete modified project into one CDP. I hope this clarifies the status of the project review and the City's CDP. Please contact me at 415-904-5248 or tluster@coastal.ca,Qov if have any questions or would like more information. Sincerely, Tom Luster Energy,Ocean Resources, and Federal Consistency Division ATTACHMENT NO. 5 P D S E I D ® N R E S D U R C E S Mr. Ricky Ramos September 7, 2010 Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach Coastal Development Permit In Poseidon's original application, dated February 2, 2010, we requested an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 and an amendment to Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. By this letter, we are requesting that the amendment to Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05 be processed as a new Coastal Development Permit, rather than as an amendment to Coastal Development Permit No, 02-05. By this reference, Poseidon hereby includes as part of the administrative record for the new Coastal Development Permit application, the application for an amendment to Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05, all materials submitted by Poseidon and its agents in connection with the application for an amendment to Coastal Development Permit No. .02-05, and the entire administrative record for the amendment to Coastal Development Permit No. 02-05. Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (714) 596-7946. Sincerely, � F 1_ Josie McKinley Director, Project Development Poseidon Resources Corporation RECEIVED Poseidon Resources 17011 Beach Boulevard,Suite 900,Huntington Beach,CA 92647,USA Dept. GP Pit's;nirl' 714-596-7946 Fax 714-596-7947 ATTACHME Executive Office: 1055 Washington Boulevard,Stamford,CT 06901 Notice of Public Hearing — Coastal Development Permit NO. 10- 014/ Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10-30 (Seawater Desalination Project -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 nn, City ClerlNOtice of Public Hearing — Coastal ®evelopme . # . NO. 1 9i"2120992 tington Beac ie City Clerkbl4/ Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10-30 (Se9 at . aeon 00.4 14 Sox 190 pro ect -9- 20 10 . Agenda Item # 6 0 -3ach, CA 92�48 g ��- _- , 0910812010 � "`' Mailed From 92648 OB POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Huntington Harbor POA v P.O.Box 791 Sunset Beach,CA 90742 NIXIE 9117 0C 1 00 091 1SJ 1.0 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 92648019090`` *1 j600-j05723-j1 j'5-41 H* 4-2 'a i'&40 llJl D771l3►F�I77J)J7��7, 7)�1J,ID7111 D1771)J,JI7�JJ111)I,7l711 inn, City Clerk itington Beach W; `4 �2: ?. he City Clerk Box 190 0 €each, CA 92648 2613 a€ems r, 9? 4 - - US POST AGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING _ ID: 507 APN: Resident 864 � Ave Hun each,CA 9264 NIXIE 927 DC 1 00 09117/10 - RETURN TO SENDER NO SUCH NUMBER UNABLE TO FORWARD MC: 92840019090 *2077- 07016- 17-22 926 4f ft4. )1,1JJJJIJI�IIJJJ�,.,II„iD)lJ 7JDJllf,1,J11,7,1D1,) l„JJ)t,3) e City Clerk ` 'ox 190 .00 _10; - (4 1•- , M 0910812010 !ach, CA 92648 su vs w w Mailed Prow 92648 ts` US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING _ r _ �D• 47 Rend�t AP/V.- 114_1S ® 21g�1 0 72 . .. Newtant- ,nn, City ClerNotice of Public Hearing — Coastal Developp • NO. 1 02H16209932 tington Beach lU Ca he City Clerk0014/ Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10-30 (Se@%fa anion$00. 14 Box 190 each CA 9284goject -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 201 2 X 0 '08° 01 2 Mailed From 92648 �S POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident 21851 gton BBeeac t CA92646-7640 � Huntington NIXIE 9227 DE 1 00 09114/19 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 92648019090 *2077-0406 7-14-26 ��r...ur•I#...���j, �� 1111.tii)I)1}11)7713)11},I-,11))7;ttlll)ll)113))17itillttl)71311 n, City Clerk ngton Beach LN ;12 �162G9932 City Clerk _ � � . �_ ach, CA 92648 � 0917812010 0: $tailed From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Krystalyn.Franks Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St S Huntington Beach, C NIXIE 927 BE 1 09/1s/10 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE T6 FORWARD DC' 92640019099 '*2977-11704- 10-35 ;,.�;�;�;����a 11717))31i1i11i7�177117)171177>7))11171771177i1i1i)11}i))317)1 Box 190 0 0 each, CA 92648 U3 I- ' $ 09108i2010. Mailed From 92648 us P6STAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Mary Moses Or Current Resident 21851 Newlanc ^" in, City ClerkNotice of Public Hearing — Coastal Developme NO. 1 ` 13 116209932 ington Beacr014/ Tentative Parcel Ma NO. 10-30 See at a n ie City Clerk p 'oo 00.414 lox 190 Project -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 c_ n a 09108/2010 ach, CA 92648 1%at Mailed From 92648 LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Peter Nisson Or Current Resident 21851 Newland S NIXIE 927 DE: I 00 091 14710 Huntington Beact RETURN T9 SENDER VACANT UNAS1_E TO FORWARD p� cc; '9264 j001 .2)t9090] j077-�04972-1�4-26 iYYsC01i—il.—P `s 41%0 I171,iiili )ll,liii;117)I111)),.il)11�)il)��)))�)�))�li)i)11,�1 in, City Clerk ington Beach 0f2H16209932 e City Clerk 00 4 ;ox 190 00 � - )ach, CA 92648 LU CA at 92648 ffi US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING . e ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Yoko Harada Ornt Resident M44Newland St Spc ' NIXIE 9:7 OE 1 00 09114110 Huntington Beach,CA 9 RETURf! TO SENDER *VACANT UNAMLE TO FORWARD SC:t 92640019090 i*i2077- 0]4671-.1�]4--26 .ox 190 0 u - 00.414 ach, CA 92648 a 0 031081 2010 rf:ac ■• Mailed Prose 92648 S POST GE LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING iD:470 APN: 114150-72 Resident Newland 109 m 1851 Newland St gip,92646-7629 tuntington Ileac in, City Clerk 16209932 :ington BeactNOtice of Public Hearing — Coastal Devel m �t NO. ,e city clerk O14/ Tentative Parcel Ma NO. 10-30 S~ uv 1- 3ox 190 p t IntlO1 - - :ach, CA 926 J g LU v d- 091�812�1fl Project -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 e W Mailed From 92648 a' US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ' Resident Z r=1 Newland St SI NI XI E 927 DE 1 00 091 14110 HOngton Beach, Ci RE'rU3ar3 TO SENDER VACANT UNA€ LE . TO FORWARD ec: 92646019090 *2077-04075-1 4-26 i"9=a13HL..P s4P- -*50 ii,1,,,,I,i,il,,yl�,ii,ii�il,,,�,�lii�i�,il,�,i,i►,ii�>>„l,ll ynn, City Clerk ntington Beach 0 W 012H162o'9932 the City Clerk UJ Box 190 0 00. 3each, CA 92648 01081210 maeieo From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Denise Marino Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 149 Huntington Beach, NIXIE 927 DE 1 00 09/ 14/10 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNADLE TO FORWARD 9c: 92649019090 *2077- 04074-14-26 t'-HQQf-iL-P?-s49 agion Deaun LU City Clerk S- -, 00.� 4 �x 190o 0910812014 3ch, CA 92648 w9 IMailed From 92648 I. US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ` Ip:470 APn- 114A50-72 nn, City ClerNotice of Public Hearing — Coastal Developme -NO. 1 Q 2H16209932 tington Beach W he city Clerk014/ Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10-30 (Se mat a on 00.4 14 Box 190 each CA 92Rd-oject -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 LOU 2 a ° '0812�10 W�` !Railed From 92648 !1S POSTMGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ol iD:467 APN: 114-150-53 Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 5 Huntington Rznrh (`A (I')0A,. NIXIE 927 DE 1 00 09J14/10 i RETURN TO SENDER . VACANT UNABLE, TO FORWARD BC:j 92648019090 j jJ j*2 j07]7- 04e 78-14j�-s6 i nn, City Clerk tington Beach " r # 2'i1F399 32 ,ie City Clerk 4 Box 190 each, CA 92648 Lu a 09168.'201 Mailed From 92648 US PSpTAE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING o .. ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 ` Resident 21851 NE Huntingtc NIXIE 927 DE 1 00 09/14/10 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD Etc:] 92640019090 *2077- jQ j4.8i7'7- t14-26 -Hc;Qi—i6 11 a; "i II)ltitll111l1t)tlitlitlltlltt}tlillli'l)Iltitlllitllilitilill City Clerk 00. 14 )X 190 M F- .ro ter• 09108/2010 3ch, CA 92648 { • Mailed Front 92 6A8 U PO§TALE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING o - ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Christopher Nielsen Or Current Resident 0 , 21851 Newland St Spc 249 Huntington Beach,C" nn, City Cler otice of.Public Hearing — Coastal Developpie NO. 1 OMH16209932 tington Beach he 190 lerk014/ Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10-30 (Se guk#at ' - aeon . 14 each, CA92JRfoject -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 �0 X ° '°$' °'° Q i� i : Mailed Eros. 92648 Us POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING _ ID: 197 APN: 148--073-26 Mi, iael Morton ;Breton to 031 bgto;, Beach, N X X I E. 927 OE 1 00 09,/14 l 10 RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNABLE TO FORWARD Bc: 9.2640019090 *2077-02150-14-2S Flynn, City Clerk intington Beach at* 012H 6209932 the City Clerk Box 190 0 0 ® 4 Beach, CA 92648 �` 0 �°a20?0 Mailed From -0-2648 = US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 0 ID-. 470 APN: 114-150-72 Wayne Estabrook Or Current Resic N:CXXC 927 OF- 1 00 09/14/io 21851 Newland Huntington Bea, RETURN 'TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD 0c: 92648019090 *2077-04880-1 4-26 0HLV4819RPS41W-50 ll,l,,,,l,#,ll,,,I„II„i,ll„3,,,Ili,l,.ii,,,l,i„#1,,,,al,ll e City Clerk 1Z ().4 14 !ach CA 92648 � L a 0 W 0910812010 W �` Mailed Frpm 92648 r�- -- US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING �z ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ® �_IIy Abajian Current Resident Q�, ,n City ClerkNotice of Public Hearing — Coastal Develop NO. 1 1,62099 2 ington Beach LX ie 190 jerk 014�/ Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10-30 (Sera ion peg. 4 ;ach, CA 926Rroject -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 QT 'W d; - '�� ' ' rayed From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 146 APN: 148-086-14 S Williams forth Ln oil Beach, C N Ix I E 927 DE 1 00 09 j 14 j 1 O RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: . 920548019090 2tj77j7— j0 i2 i�PS—1 j4—syS in, City Clerk ington Beach 0 U) 16 072H1620-9932 ie City Clerk LU lox 190 II 1- :ach, CA 92648 ` d" mailedrnrn)i 9-2-11148 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING if-.-. 8 APN: 148-086-16 ® s Ellison r 1 Sea forth Ln _ Wigton Beach, r NIXIE 927 CIE 1 00 09/1 4/10 _-_.- RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNABLE TO FORWARD BC:i jj92i6j4j901j909j0 ) j*2j07j7-0j21SS— j14-2S C llllY VlClfl - >— ox 190 00 � � �� �� ach, CA 92648 w iE a 091u8/2f31 w +" Mailed From 92648 t�S PSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: _137 APN: 148-086-05 . nd Susan Convery F. aforth Ln `n Beach,CP nn, City ClerNotice of Public Hearing — Coastal ®evelopigie ENO. 1®12H1e2o9932 tington Beach he city Clerk014/ Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10-30 (Se �Cc at on 00.4� 4 Box 190 each, CA92Rxoject -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 LU ¢ 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Stacey Lavoie o Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St S l�gton Beach,( NIXIE 927 DE 1 00 09/14/10 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 92648019090 #==QHi.. 36'4-*PLA44P ynn, City Clerk }fington Beach REIN -012H!6209932 the City Clerk Box 190 0 0 �, leach, CA 92648 d x It k�-:ed From, 92648 U POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING r � ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Louis Amerman Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 53 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 NIXIE 927 DE 1 0D 09/14/10 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 92640019090 j*2077- O4Oa3- j14-28 City Clerkcc �� ° ox 190 �` F.. ach, CA 92648 ° ?" ` 0 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 25 APN: 148-044-29 ® Alejandro Arredondo Rosa M Vizcarra 826 S Oranae A nn, City Clerk tington BeacNotice of Public Hearing — Coastal Develo p N0. 1&H16209932 ie City Clerk Sox 190 014/ Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10-30 (Segi&a alion 00.4 14 each, CA 92"oject -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 Mailed F°m/ 26 8 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING US POSTAGE ID: 37 APN: 148-044-25 e James Thies 8563 Amazon Pi"or 'ounfa inValley; 927 DE 1 DCI 09,+1 /10 RETURN 7© SENDER NOT DELIVERAGLE AS ADDRESSED I A► AGLE TO FORWARD MCI 92640019090jjt } -*to 077- 0 600- 14- 22 nn, City Clerk tington Beach D . � 012H16209932 ie City Clerk Uj � 3ox 190 °G 00• ` 1 each, CA 92648 a 09108/2010 w MIX Mailed From 92646 - US POSTA N LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING „ r AP 148-081-07 /� Nayne sID-. 81 eNdyIN zX I E 927 DE 1 06 0911.4!10 RE'TURN TO SENDER On E NOT DELI�+ERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNADLE TD FORWARDMC; 92S4601090 *2077- 04ssO -14- 26 �II)II77)]7�))177J�77��i7�17fII))))1.11-)I711)#Il�)I#3��#I)li�ill urlywrr vcu�.�� ie City Clerk v 00.414 3ox 190 w 1.- J 09/08/2010 3ach, CA 92648 Mailed From 92648 �- US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING e 113:470 APN: 114-150-72 Wsident in, City Cler Notice of Public Hearin Coastal Devel NO. 1&2H16209932 .ington Beach'' g O ie city clerk 014/ Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10-30 (Sea ►a a on Q .414 ;ach CA926Rroject -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 �_ Mailedox 190 ° 'om �48 a.E US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING,: ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 INS Resdent 2r�'Pacific Coast I H ton Beach,C) NI XIC 927 DC 1 00 09/14/10 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNADLE TO FORWARD OC: S264 j8019]090 j2077-022tt(30-1 4-2S I-S=,:&.dl-li ) ))))I117F�17)I7)11F)i31117))F77I�1137��)771)'IIl11)1)1�7)I ,nn,City Clerk 012'r320= 32 tington Beach he City Clerk - . 14 Box 190 00 - 010 each, CA 92648 LU Mailed�39i e812 _ ailed rrom 92648 US PO TA LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING r ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 -I 16sident ' 51 Newland St Huntington Beach, NIXIE 927 DE 1 00 091:1411 O RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNASLC TO FORWARD CC: 9264eO19090 *207]7-04666-14-26 s-�yy��..�����+ ��,� �17�iiF717�7�i1)31))11Fill��.l)ii771��),II 71�777�)I77�IFi))3�)II e City Clerk ox 190 N 0. " 14 00 ach, CA 92648 ", M e91uar2t�1e wit .1 IS Mailed From,92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING e ID: 17 APN: 148-041-05 Car �� er 2;. hlea Ln - - - mn, City CierIOtice of.Public Hearing - Coastal Develogra�e O. 10112H16209932 itington Bead 'he Box it90 le0014/ Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10-30 (Se t tibn 00.4 14 QM each, CA 92 v01'ect -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 � _ ° '0��2�,0 g cc 1 Mailed From 92648 s` US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING !_ •' ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Max Stimac Or current.Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 69 o Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 NIXIE 927 DE 1 00 09/14/10 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD sc:: j92640019090 *207 7- 02227-:14-2S r"iJ:xL.ii-YL?415'@:@ e4V=5 !!!!)I7lliiilli))liil!!i!1lI71ii))1TlIlT)1!i)i!Jl1D1l737)i!7!! nn, City Clerk 93342 tington Beach 0 ,�6?e9 he City Clerk �5 $00.414 each CA 92648 a_ 0910 s12010 ,5� �. `�•` Baited From 92648 P S POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING_ _ - - _- ___ ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Suzanne Sephton Or C � '��Resident 218 land St Spc Huntington Beach,CA NIXIE 927 DE 1 00 09/14/1 C RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD QC: 92640019090jjjj ) j *j2Kj 1 7-02220-1 j4-23 92aL !!1li!)71)lilllJl!)iJ.li)!J!!Ii))iilJlil TT!liil l7!)J!!)TJiilT!! . ie City Clerk `n Sox 190 ®0 $00.414 :ach, CA 92648 &' 091i08120 Fo W! tU§a;led From 92648 C' US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING_ _ ID:470 APN, 1 14 Resident -a50-72 o .851 Newland St Spc 1 9A ., ton Beat ,nn Cler tin City eacNotice of Public Hearin Coastal Devel NO. 1 QQH16209932 tnngton Beac g — �� he 19Clerk 014/ Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10-30 (Sett a a on 00.4 '1QR 4 -o'ect -9- 20 — 10 — Agenda Item # 6 �l� , ' ° '°8'2°�° each, CA 92 � g �� .� R GC Mailed Fries, 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 382 APN: 149-023-16 Amber Wagner u-5526 W Dorothea Ave Visalia, CA 93277 NIXIE 913 DE 1 00 09/12/10 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD MC: 92649019090 i jam'0052-i01.447-12T-44 ..-.,a. s _-x-. ..:....-,. -, _ .-- .. �;_ z' -_ :..._ .. z,. _�• s..--'- -fix ,,�_ .,, �-.s. .... .-� __._.'__ - _._ `___. in, City Clerk :ington Beach121 �° ' ie City Clerk �5 00.4 14 0 3ox 190 + , )ach, CA 92648 tu W W ' r ?ailed From 9-2 48 tL _ US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING_ _ ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 Resident 21 752 Pacific Coast Hw 0 0 tington go, _y Spc 14a NIXIE 927 DE 1 00 O9.J14/10 ..,.,,., RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 92648019090 *2077-02224-14-25 e City Clerk 00 4 14 ox 190 (n€� 1-- j 0910812010 !ach, CA 92648 lu c W 19 Mailed From 92648 US POISTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Jorge Festini Of'-Current Resider+ ,;�.NewlandSt y Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach `• o12a62a92 Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 0 ' 4- +5 09/0812010 O Huntington Beach, CA 92648 W. maimed From 92648 zI z US POSTAGE , LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING s APN: 148-121-18 ® Nu WRecycling Inc 175 Ave Nz x 927 OC 1 00 0s'�-.,/.2,1j 10 O !N^ Laguna ch, CA 926�r RETURN TO SENDER �o vJ ;,;rYe NOT ' Oct-IVERAE;3i..{r -AS •A' DD REssi o O' E; ;-i+ i�t, i-. s 11,1>,,,1,1>11,, hMY)l,)l,>>,,,l1i,l>,ll,,,l,1>,11,,,,,1,11 O .® U Z CU N Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk � City of Huntington Beach - �'IaILBOk C�,)��� I Office of the City Clerk �. RFr� P.i� FFi��Ep, . P.O. Box 190 r 9y = �-v tr0 �' 5 t. p �; Huntington Beach, CA 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING_ Ll.. Rf CV' k— O (D U ID: 142 APN: 148-086-10 U N' Michael Ogan 21371 Ceaforth Ln Z CL i B Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7040 NOTIFY SENDER OF NEW ADDRESS OGAN i 4e,4 LAKE PARK AVE-: #$ 374 OAKL AND Cif 94610--2700 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach o12H162Q332. Uj Office of the City Clerk �D e P.O. Box 190 oo 09/08/2010 Huntington Beach, CA92648d�4 "8 5 US POST AI LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING B ID: 470 AFN: 114-150-72 Christine Smith Or Current resident 21851 Newland St Spc 153 ® Huntington Beach, CA _ •�3`�`��.� �;.��7 .�� y n.�.z .:amp'�.x1.#"3 RE7li S 'TO SENDER VACANT Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk • 012H 66209932 City of Huntington Beach 0 o ° Office of the City Clerk o 4 a P.O. Box 190 93 a °°� fly09p08.'2010 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 19 o dmaEie From 92fi�+ . ; .- US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 287 APN: 149-031-10 Lynn Davis Bekki e - 9022 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7843 µ VAC 51 '�.� h t �{A •4 iJ ... 3 ; tf�{11���s�l ftt f�f.f��lt�� 1l:�f�'��I'�f���F�lil(�flli fit ��t Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 012HI6209932 City of Huntington BeachMOO o Office of the City Clerk FIB $(L),().4 14 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 oo o � ��?i`GBr''2r� Pd siEe. �,ar 92648 _ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING o .• ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident 9 , 21'851 Newland St Spc 59 AC Huntington Beach,CA 92646- f f- ,t111I'll 1,1 1[141l.ti;�t; �Ii>tltl�i„ If4fr!ltII�1lflll w Joan L. Flynn; City Clerk f�12H962o9'�32 City of Huntington Beach Mj Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 0 °0 ri— ���'� �� rd Huntington Beach, CA 92648 et ,C�B;'?tis v. 92648 [ POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING r - ID: 313 APN: 114-481 01 Terence Boston Jamboree Rd#3" e *w 01t Beach, CA 92( N I X T M6 r RMTURN TO [_NDC:R TTEMPTE".-`.I3 -- NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, September 20, 2010 at 6 00 p m in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items ❑ 1 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 10-014/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 (SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT): Applicant: Poseidon Resources Corporation Request: CDP: To permit the construction and operation of a 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project on a ±13 acre site The project includes up to ±4 miles of water transmission lines (±1 mile in the Coastal Zone) in Huntington Beach to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa and a tentative parcel map to facilitate the development of the project Concurrent with its consideration of Coastal Development Permit No 10-014 the City Council shall consider rescission of Coastal Development Permit No 02-05 Should the City Council approve Coastal Development Permit No 10-014, that approval would replace the City Council's prior approval of Coastal Development Permit No 02-05 TPM To subdivide three parcels totaling ±19 5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project Coastal Development Permit No 10-014 and Tentative Parcel Map No 10-130 follow City Council action on Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No 10-001 and Entitlement Plan Amendment No 10-001 and associated agreements Should the City Council certify SEIR No 10-001 and approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No 10-001 and associated agreements for the subject project at the September 7, 2010 meeting, the City Council shall consider ratifications of those actions at this meeting Location: 21730 Newland (east side, south of Edison Avenue) Project Planner: Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No 10-001 for Item No 1 was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act It was determined that Item No 1 would have a significant environmental effect and, therefore, an environmental impact report is warranted The Subsequent Environmental Impact Report is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning and Building Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No 1 is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No 10-014 filed on September 7, 2010 in conjunction with the above request C',Documents and Settings\esparzap\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content Outlook\EVZI IETS\092010(Poseidon) (2)doc NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action The City Council's action on Item No 1 may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245 32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations, or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office, 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802-4302, phone number (562) 590-5071 ON FILE A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday September 16, 2010 ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Joan L Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 C\Documents and Settings\esparzap\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content Outlook\EVZI I ETS\092010(Poseidon) (2)doc CLASSIFIED r rJ �' � r �r1 J )rr CLASSIFIE J�r1 J Jr Daily Pilot ADVERTISING Daily Pilot Daily Pilot ADVERTISIN Daily 'lot HtB1I, Printedby 9966 Sandrine Gann Sop 2010 243pm H.B.I. nnledby 9966SandriniG n Sep 2010 243pm Salesperson LK I1 Phone AU033767116 H.B.I. Salesperson H, Phone Atl#33757116 -,�, ACCOH ntlnformation a and referjibe eh v sIt�III flit rTrct ounm,r a ItsIth Id or nmeumoel ous w wen y - Ad Information .� roar wry Phone# (714)5365227 Startdate 09-09-10 Size 3x75960 C1efk '-o'Lynn Cdy Clerk Name CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Stopdate 0"9-10 Billedsize 750TCNIncn otynn inn tmgtn n Bash Address P O BOX 784 2000M mi she t meTm9 Insertions 1 Keyword Hnntinglon Beach Cablornia 97648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 Ratecode &Legal Huntington Beach Adtype Liner Pablisnna lmnungmn Dean i oe e5de t2evrember9 zolo os2 s7s Takenby 9966Sandrine Gann Acct# 277391004 Classification 13000 LegalNotices Publications TCN HBI Client PLANNING DEPT-CITY HUNTING TONBEACH Placedby Ricky Ramos Fax# (714)374-1557 Ad Copy NOTICEOFFIBUCHEARING ' BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that oa M-day September 20 2010 at 600 in In In the Cdy Counul Chambers 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach the City Councd will held a public heating on the tollowmg planning and g moms -11 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO 10 014/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 10-130 (SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT) Apph,ont Posudon Resources rpoe Coaleon Rn9nes/ ruction CDP To period the const and operation of a 50 Miller,gallons per day seawater tlesahnohon project +13 acre site The protect includes up to +4 miles of water I ransmessmn tines(+1 mde m the Coastal Zone)in Huntington Beach t0 nett to ati xrsting regional transmission system is Costa Mesa and a correct parcel map 10 facilitate the development of the project Concurrent with its cnnsrd Crahon of Coastal Development Permit No 10 014 the City Council shall c nsider r of Cottlal Develo Vinent Period No 02 05 Should the City Count Isapple-Coastal Development Permt No 10 014 that approval would Told a the City Councils pe for approval of Coastal Development Pmmt No 02 05 TPM To subdivide three parcels totahng +195 a Into lour parcels to fauhl,te thi development of the projed Coastal or vci.pmenl Penmt Nn 10 01 1,nd Tentative Parcel Mau No 10 130 follow Crty Council action on Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(Sh IR) No 10001 and Entitlement Plan Amendment No 10 001 and associated agreements Should the Cay Councd certify SEIR NO 10 001 and approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No 10 001 and associated agn-1-ts for the sublect or tort at the Septeni 7 2010 meeting the City Counul shall consider ratihcatrons of those actions at this it., L—Tien 21730 Newland(east side south of Ed—a Avenue)Prole,t Planner Ricky Ramos Same,Planner NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Subsequent En-onmental Impact Report No 10001 for Item No I was processed and rompleled m olds nor with the California Lnvrrchmental Quality Act It was delermnetl that Item No 1 would have a signrheant envdonmental effect and therefore. aT en tal impact report warranted The SuOseyuenl Em,n Onmentel Impact Report rs n Idesat the City of Huntington Bearh Piannmg and Bmidmp Department 2000 Main Street and is vailabl,for public mspection end comment by contacting the Plannmg and Building Department Or by telcphomng(714)536 5271 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Ihot Item No I is located in the appealable lurrsd coon of the Coastal Zone and includes Loastal Development Permit No 10014 filed on September 7 2010 in condunchan with the above quest NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Coastal Development Permit hearing sists of a staff report public hearing City Council discussion and action the Gty Councils action on Item No I may be appealed to th, Coastal Commission within ten(10)working days tram the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission Vursu rnt to Section 24532 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdlvsron Dntlmance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations or unless Tdle 14 Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code Is applicable The Coastal Comm—M,address is South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangnte 10th Floor Long Beach CA 90802 4302 phone member (562)590 5071 ON FILE A copy al the proposed request rs on file in the Planning and Budding Department 2000 Mam Street liunfington Beach Cnlilornra 92648 for rnspe,lM r,by the public P CONY of Iho ste(1 report will he nv,ilablp to terested parties at the It Clerks Office nn Thursday September, 16 i70to ALL INlCOLSTED I ERSONS are invited to attend sard hearing and Pxpress opinions 0, su bmt—d-,e for o agamst the application a douned above If you,ai is nge Ore City Council s action ra ur[ you may he: limited t0 ra smg only those issues you 0 coke r sod at the public hearnrg de—Led m this notice a -tt,a c respondence deh—col to the City at or prior to the mrbhc heating ll there,ra any ad proof pg 1 ad proof pg 2 0918/0%9@ fiJany oane ajggedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ lemol ap o1190113 �30918/091g®wand Minn alggedwoo„8/g Z x azisaq„l l `J � -�?►ems 1 13 HB Chamber of Commerce Orange County Assoc of Realtors Amigos De Bolsa Chica - President Dave Stefamdes President 19891 Beach Blvd Ste 140 25552 La Paz Road P O Box 1563 - Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 4 Suns ch Community Assoc Huntington Beach Tomorrow Building Industry Assoc of South Calif Pat President President Attn Elyse Sminada,Govt Affairs Asst PO Box PO Box 865 17744 Sky Park Circle,Suite 170 Sunset Beach,CA 907 15 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Irvine,CA 92614 8 SCAG tTI Corral 100 Environmental Board Chair Richard Spicer a brell Robert Smith 818 West 7th, 12th Floor 20292 Eastw Circle 21352 Yarmouth Lane Los Angeles, CA 90017 Huntington Beach,CA 646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 11 12 Huntington Harbor POA Ma Environmental Rutan&Tucker,LLP P.O Box 791 Attn Shawn aabsk Senior Planner Jeffrey Oderman Sunset Beach,CA 90742 6701 Center Dnve #900 611 Anton Blvd,-14fkFloor Los Angeles,CA 90 Costa Mesa,CA 9262 - 950 (T-3) 14 15 Newland House Museum Historic Resources Board Chair C ncil on Aging Pres,H B Historical Society Barbara Haynes 1706 e Ave 19820 Beach Blvd 19341 Worchester Lane Huntington Beach, 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 16 16 16 S cliff HOA cliff HOA eacliff HOA Je I o Roe Lo one 19391 Shady H Circle 19382 Surf Lane 19821 Ocean Circle Huntington Beach,CA 2648 Huntington Beach,C 92648 Huntington Beach, 92648 16 17 18 Johnson Kirsten Berg Pacific Coast haeologncal Society,Inc 19671 Qui y Lane 18870 Kithira Circle Attn J thold Huntington Beach, 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 PO Box 1 Costa Mesa,CA 92 7 19 O C Ping &Dev Seances Dept O C Resources&Develop Mgt Dept City of Costa Mesa Director Bryan Speegle Planning Director P O Box 4048 P O Box 4048 P.O Box 1200 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200 22� 23 City of Fountain Valley City of Newport Beach City of Westminster Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director 10200 Slater Ave P.O Box 1768 8200 Westmwster Blvd. Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Newport Beach,CA 92663-8915 Westminster,CA 92683 /l� 25 City of Seal Beach � California Coastal Commission California Coastal Commission 25 Planning Director Theresa Henry South Coast Area Office 211 Eighth St South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, loth Floor Seal Beach,CA 90740 200 Oceaugate, loth Floor Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 am n/.M//o Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery(05160/8160 //k D 0^/ 1 0918/0919,D Aaany oane algiledwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z lewaol ap 90anbi13 26 G8/09190 AaaAd gJIM algiledwoo«8/9 Z x j azis la 27> • ' 28 Department of Transportation,Disk 12 Local Solid Waste Enf Agy Hunt on Beach Post Office Christopher Herre,Branch Chief O C Health Care Agency New Gro Coordunator 3337 Michelson Dr,Suite 380 Director 6771 Warne ve Irvine,CA 92612-1699 P O Box 355 Huntington Beach,CA 647 Santa Ana,CA 92702 301 30 Fountain Valley Elem. School Dist HB City Elementary School Dist HB City Elementary School Dist Marc Ecker Dr Gary Rutherford,Super David Perry 10055 Slater Avenue 20451 Craimer Lane 20451 Cranner Lane Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 31 O Ocean View Elem School Dist Westminster School District HB Union High School District 33 Atta Cindy Puller,Admm Services Clark Hampton Stephen Ritter 17200 Pmehurst Lane 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 5832 Bolsa Avenue Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Westminster,CA 92683 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 34 35 36 Cannery Hamilton Properties,LLC Goldenwest College OC County Harbors,Beach&Parks De�t-j Ascon Landfill Site c/o Tamara Zeier Attn Fred Owens P O Box 4048 One Pointe Drive,Suite 320 15744 Goldenwest St. Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Brea,CA 92821 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 37 38 38 Bella Terra Mall Country View Estates HOA CountiZ View Estates HOA Attn Pa ers-Laude C �IL ( Ge Chapman 7777 Edinger 1/300 6642 Tr 6742 Sher cleHuntington Beach,CA 647 Huntington B , 92648 Huntington Beach, 92648 39 39 40 Meadowlark Area M dowlark Area Hearthside Homes S Chery wrong 6 Executive Circle,Suite 250 5161 Gelding cle 16771 Rooseve ane Irvine,CA 92614 Huntington Beach,CA 649 Huntington Beach,CA 649 \ 41 41 42' Bolsa Chica Land Trust Bolsa Cluca Land Trust OC Sanitation District 5200 Warner Avenue,Ste 108 Evan Henry,President 10844 Ellis Avenue Huntington Beach,CA 92649 1812 Port Tiffin Place Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Newport Beach,CA 92660 42 42 ( L2 AES Huntington Beach,LLC Richard Loy John Ely \\J� Eric Pendegralk Plant Manager 9062 Kahulm Dnve 22102 Rockport Lane 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 43 44 45 HB Coastal Communities Assoc. Downtown Business Association Downto de>rts Association David Guido Mr St amels Ms Man Germain 143 E.Meats Avenue 200 Main S 06 505 Orange,CA 92865 Huntington Beach,CA 9 48 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 (4 47 Gabneleno/Tongva Tribal Council Juaneno Band of Mission Indians AYSO Region 55 Chairperson Agachemen Nation Co oner Russ Marlow PO Box 693 31411 La Matanza Street 18111 B ell Circle San Gabriel,CA 91778 San Juan Capistrano,CA 92675-2625 Huntington Beach, 92647 o / label size V x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 915160/8160 2- Q/ ]O/�� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 /b (�i 0919/09t90 Aaany Dane algiledwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z lewaol ap allanbil3 09G8/09 G9®Aaany glim algiledwoo„g/g Z x,,[azis lagel • ' 47 47 47 AYSO Region 56 AYSO gion 117 AYSO egion 143 Da id Fike Comruisione John Ahnanza Dave Kuiper 20091 T quil Lane 9049 geld Ave 16033 Bol Cluca#104 Huntington each,CA 92646 Fountain V ey,CA 92708 PM 3#163 Huntington E each,CA 92649 47 47 47 Huntington B ch Jr All American Huntington Beach I lop Warner Football Gold t Extreme F otball David Snyder Rick B r,President Kudlack 5341 Granvill 20501 S burbta Lane 18432 odwin Lane Huntington Bech,CA 92649 Huntington ch,CA 92646 Huntington 3cach,CA 92647 47 47 47 North Huntuigt n Beach Futbol Club South Coast Ba ern Futbol Club Huntington Bea h Youth LaCrosse President hereen Walter Maris Pena Nficha 1 Mutne 1511 L eside lane 22222 Eu yptus Lane 17761 sty Lane Huntington 3each,CA 92648 Lake For es,CA 92630 Huntington Bc ach,CA 92649 47 47 47 Oakview Re iewal Partnership Fountain Vallef Pony Baseball Huntington B h Girls Softball Jose odnguez Al tua Gerry Stee ,President 7850 Slate Ave,Space 59 14591 Y cca Circle 6172 S telly Dr Huntington I 3each,CA 92647 Huntington B ch,CA 92647 Huntington B ch,CA 92647 47 47 47 Huntington V dley Little League Ocean Vie Little League District 62 C longer Division Mic el Kircher Stephanie n,President Gail er 9767 wall Drive18041 S ont Lane 17961 S tia Circle Huntington each,CA 92646 Huntington E each,CA 92649 Huntington ch,CA 92647 47 47 47 Robmwooi I Little League Seaview I aide League South Huntington Beach Girls Fast Pitch Kathryn Beutel-Lui Micah I Mailman So all 6551 Reimnck Circle P O ox 5305 Barry iburn Huntington E each,CA 92647 Huntington E each,CA 92615 PO BcK7332 Huntington Beach,CA 92615 47 48 C49 West Co Family YMCA W Village HOA Coastkeepers Tama Hyuve vn Hoisington 5200 Bl kpool Road Gary Brown 1%91 ch Blvd #17 Wes er,CA 92683 3151 Airway Ave.Suite F-110 Huntington B h,CA 92648 Costa Mesa,CA 92663 50 51 51 Briggs La Corporation Regional Enviro ental Officer for Calif US Navy Attn-Valeri A Mosqueda Western Reg on Environ Office lie onovan 99 East"C" treet,Suite 11 US Force CommunitLiaison Coordinator Upland, A 91786 333 Marko Street Suite 625 1c Highway San Franca CA 94105-2196 San A 92132-5190 51 51 51 Fort Western Regio Environmental Office er-Lt Col Pa D Cramer Patrick C Director r RubinDirector of Public rks Nat'l Tr ming Dublic Works Cn US Marine rps Building 1164 CombTBo 555246 rammg Center PO Box 05097 Camp Peadlet n,CA 92055-5246Sth St Fort Irwin. A 92310 Parks RFTA Dublin,CA 94568 I • label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 3 940 0 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 Easy Peelw Labels A ® Bend along line to �'/��$�®51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID 376 APN 149-014-04 ID 454 APN 149-022-22 ID 232 APN 149-231-03 Willard Tolles Gpc3 Huntington �CA District 10 Marquette Apt 218 1003 Vista Ridge Ct 10251 Yorktow Irvine,CA 92612-4205 Carson City, NV 89705-8044 Huntington Be , 6 2926 ID 262 APN 114-481-13 ID 529 APN 114-160-81 ID 452 APN 149-021-07 Charles Lourtie Regents Of The University Of Calif Robert A&Catherine Gingras 10737 Crebs Ave 1111 Franklin St#6 1122 Eichhorn Dr Porter Ranch, CA 91326-2763 Oakland, CA 94607-5201 Erie,CO 80516-5403 ID 318 APN 114-481-06 ID 16 APN 148-041-06 ID 440 APN 149-022-08 Marina Valsamakis Francisca Salcido M And Cleta Keith 1130 Las Olas Ave 11461 S Church St 119 Cattle Trail Way Santa Barbara, CA 93109-2115 Orange, CA 92869-2601 Georgetown,TX 78633-4562 ID 497 APN 148-121-03 ID 441 APN 149-021-06 ID 166 APN 148-074-02 Tarnutzer Family Maria Lorente Judith Beauchamp 1320 Willow Pass Rd Ste 300 1505 Tahiti Ave 151 Kalmus Dr Ste B150 Concord,CA 94520-5241 Laguna Beach,CA 92651-1946 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7955 ID 433 APN 149-024-24 ID 45 APN 148-044-09 ID 501 APN 148-121-18 Joan Klubnik Salvatore Danna Nuboard Recycling Inc 1602 E 4th St 1617 Via Arriba 1755 Park Ave Santa Ana, CA 92701-5118 Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274-1232 Laguna Beach,CA 92651-2219 ID 104 APN 148-082-29 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 55 APN 148-044-19 Ali Malekzadeh Mills Land&Water Co Raymond And Jan Kang 19 Chatfield PI E 1920 Main St Ste 1070 2 Corte De Nubes Painted Post, NY 14870-9332 Irvine, CA 92614-7223 San Clemente, CA 92673-6912 ID 127 APN 148-086-33 ID 226 APN 148-012-11 ID 449 APN 149-012-09 Ronald Wilson Huntington ch Union HS District Michael And Lon Monaghan 20122 Glacier Cir 20451 Craimer Ln 20542 Paisley Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-4821 Huntington Beach, CA 9 6-5464 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6013 ID 246 APN 149-013-02 ID 13 APN 148-041-09 ID 12 APN 148-041-10 Sandra Hubrich Laura Gibson Michael And Susan Scott 20772 Skimmer Ln 21271 Lochlea Ln 21272 Banff Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6547 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6850 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6848 ID 225 APN 148-071-05 ID 196 APN 148-073-01 ID 97 APN 148-082-22 Joseph Gallo Kimberly Preston Paul Goodwin 21272 Breton Ln 21281 Breton Ln 21281 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7128 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7147 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7001 ID 133 APN 148-086-01 ID 165 APN 148-074-01 ID 96 APN 148-082-21 Scott And Deanna Johnston Allan And Susan Schaben Damon And Julie Smythe 21281 Seaforth Ln 21281 Yarmouth Ln 21282 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7038 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7055 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7011 Etiquettes faciles 6 peter ® Repliez A la hachure afin de www.averycorn Util�sea le gabarit AVERY®5160® Sens de reveler!e rebord Po U TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' /�/�O charaement ►� p i /D —a�-/ Easy Peels labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to Q d����Y® 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM 1 ID 224 APN 148-071-06 ID 132 APN 148-086-38 ID 164 APN 148-085-01 Ira Leibowitz Joseph Frolich John Galligher _ 21282 Breton Ln 21282 Sand Dollar Ln 21282 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7128 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7002 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7039 ID 195 APN 148-073-02 ID 66 APN 148-081-23 ID 197 APN 148-073-26 Elisa Wentworth Cheryl Toghia Michael Morton 21282 Yarmouth Ln 21291 Antigua Ln 21291 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7056 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7010 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7147 ID 98 APN 148-082-23 ID 11 APN 148-041-11 ID 223 APN 148-071-07 James Bailey David Maricich Dolores Lukes 21291 Sand Dollar Ln 21292 Banff Ln 21292 Breton Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7001 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6848 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7128 ID 131 APN 148-086-37 ID 194 APN 148-073-03 ID 67 APN 148-081-22 Jillian Fabian Don Albrecht Crawford Family 21292 Sand Dollar Ln 21292 Yarmouth Ln 21301 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7002 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7056 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 ID 198 APN 148-073-25 ID 15 APN 148-041-07 ID 99 APN 148-082-24 Jack Bartel Larry Rialubin Earl And Suzanne Soderstrom 21301 Breton Ln 21301 Lochlea Ln 21301 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6850 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 ID 135 APN 148-086-03 ID 167 APN 148-074-03 ID 94 APN 148-082-19 William And Cheryl Tonic Peter And Riley Driscoll Gregory And Laura Carrow 21301 Seaforth Ln 21301 Yarmouth Ln 21302 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 ID 10 APN 148-041-12 'ID 222 APN 148-071-08 ID 130 APN 148-086-36 Robert And Cathy Lindsey Terry Lehigh Thomas Whitherby 21302 Banff Ln 21302 Breton Ln 21302 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 ID 162 APN 148-085-03 ID 193 APN 148-073-04 ID 68 APN 148-081-21 Judith Schroeder William Speicher Harry Bremmer 21302 Seaforth Ln 21302 Yarmouth Ln 21311 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 ID 199 APN 148-073-24 ID 100 APN 148-082-25 ID 136 APN 148-086-04 George Schweitzer Michael Supple Gary Bartz Jennifer L Markle 21311 Sand Dollar Ln 21311 Seaforth Ln 21311 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7129 ID 168 APN 148-074-04 ID 93 APN 148-082-18 ID 9 APN 148-041-13 J Kaa Starling Jon Rogan 21311 Yarmouth Ln 21312 Antigua Ln 21312 Banff Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6805 ttiquettes faciles 6 peler ; ® Repi►ez 31a hachure An de; www.avery.com Util►sez le abarit AVERI(®5160® Sens de reviler le rebord Po Uwm ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 ) chargement p- } 1 q��D//0 Easy PeelQ0 labels A ® Bend along line to � Q l��i�Y®5160� Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper �® expose Pop-Up Edge TM ID 221 APN 148-071-09 ID 129 APN 148-086-35 ID 192 APN 148-073-05 Steven Rakhshani Jeanie Boynton Thomas And Nicole Fischer 21312 Breton Ln 21312 Sand Dollar Ln 21312 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 ID 69 APN 148-081-20 ID 4 APN 148-041-15 ID 200 APN 148-073-23 Davis Ly&Ha T Nguyen Clayton King Grace Mc Coy 21321 Antigua Ln 21321 Banff Ln 21321 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6804 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 ID 17 APN 148-041-05 ID 101 APN 148-082-26 ID 137 APN 148-086-05 Carol Parker Rudolph And Cynthia Fnendt Donald And Susan Convery 21321 Lochlea Ln 21321 Sand Dollar Ln 21321 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6850 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 ID 169 APN 148-074-05 ID 92 APN 148-082-17 ID 8 APN 148-041-14 Scott Farrell Ahmet Aliyazicioglu Jeffrey And Tamara Olsen 21321 Yarmouth Ln 21322 Antigua Ln 21322 Banff Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6805 ID 220 APN 148-071-10 ID 128 APN 148-086-34 ID 160 APN 148-085-05 Grace Anderson Bruce Pulcini Kathleen And Peter Hamborg 21322 Breton Ln 21322 Sand Dollar Ln 21322 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7041 ID 191 APN 148-073-06 ID 70 APN 148-081-19 ID 201 APN 148-073-22 Donna Elliott Tull Taylor Jan And Barbara Varner 21322 Yarmouth Ln 21331 Antigua Ln 21331 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 ID 102 APN 148-082-27 ID 138 APN 148-086-06 ID 170 APN 148-074-06 Nancy Williams James Weepie Patrick And Louise Tierney 21331 Sand Dollar Ln 21331 Seaforth Ln 21331 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 ID 91 APN 148-082-16 ID 219 APN 148-071-11 ID 159 APN 148-085-06 Arthur And Cynthi Azpeitia James Larkin Cong Dinh&Yen Vu 21332 Antigua Ln 21332 Breton Ln 21332 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 ID 190 APN 148-073-07 ID 202 APN 148-073-21 ID 103 APN 148-082-28 David And Elena Hedlund Michael And Erin Karal Gary Smith 21332 Yarmouth Ln 21341 Breton Ln 21341 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 ID 139 APN 148-086-07 ID 171 APN 148-074-07 ID 90 APN 148-082-15 Lydia Fandga S Smith&N Koch William Lamson 21341 Seaforth Ln 21341 Yarmouth Ln 21342 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Etiquettes faCiles a peter ® Repliez a la hachure afin de /� www.avery.com & Utilisez le gabarit AVERY dhargement ®51600 Sens de MOW le rebord Pop-UP"A ' C�O -- �/��� 1-800-GO-AVERY 9/�/10 ' J J J Easy Peel®Labels Bend along line to Q /� ��® 5160� Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID 218 APN 148-071-12 ID 126 APN 148-086-32 ID 158 APN 148-085-07 John Homan Yen-ning Wang Stephen Stagnaro 21342 Breton Ln 21342 Sand Dollar Ln 21342 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 ID 72 APN 148-081-17 ID 203 APN 148-073-20 ID 140 APN 148-086-08 Donald Russell Lourdes Biancardi Michael Tessler 21351 Antigua Ln 21351 Breton Ln 21351 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 ID 172 APN 148-074-08 ID 89 APN 148-082-14 ID 217 APN 148-071-13 Michael Struckhoff Jason Truong Tracy Trinest 21351 Yarmouth Ln 21352 Antigua Ln 21352 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 ID 125 APN 148-086-31 ID 157 APN 148-085-08 ID 188 APN 148-073-09 Joel And Shary Cass Dennis Kraus R Smith 21352 Sand Dollar Ln 21352 Seaforth Ln 21352 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 ID 73 APN 148-081-16 ID 204 APN 148-073-19 ID 105 APN 148-082-30 David Luther Dept Of Vets Affairs Of State Of CA Steven Wardle 21361 Antigua Ln 21361 Breton Ln 21361 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 ID 141 APN 148-086-09 ID 173 APN 148-074-09 ID 88 APN 148-082-13 Michael Kadau Michael Cook&Eileen M Duffy Darlene Hagan 21361 Seaforth Ln 21361 Yarmouth Ln 21362 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 ID 216 APN 148-071-14 ID 124 APN 148-086-30 ID 156 APN 148-085-09 Linda Tumquist Patricia Lalgana David Grover 21362 Breton Ln 21362 Sand Dollar Ln 21362 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 ID 74 APN 148-081-15 ID 205 APN 148-073-18 ID 106 APN 148-082-31 David And Patricia Bush Beverly Weisen Jerry Webb 21371 Antigua Ln 21371 Breton Ln 21371 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 ID 142 APN 148-086-10 ID 174 APN 148-074-10 ID 215 APN 148-071-15 Michael Ogan Amir Zaki Yong And Hyon Kim 21371 Seaforth Ln 21371 Yarmouth Ln 21372 Breton Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 ID 123 APN 148-086-29 ID 155 APN 148-085-10 ID 186 APN 148-073-11 Joseph Rubens&Connie Marten Todd And Alvena Johnston Ping Oey 21372 Sand Dollar Ln 21372 Seaforth Ln 21372 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 Etiquettes faciles a peter ; - Repliez a la hachure afro de; (.�� www.avery.com 1 Utilisez le abarit AVERY@ 51600�ld,�11 6 Sens de rdv6ler le rebord Po UpTM ' ' 9 i charaamvnt p- � /� r.�� 1-800-GO-AVERY i Easy Peel®Labels A Bend along line to i AVERVO 51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edge TM � X � ID 75 APN 148-081-14 ID 206 APN 148-073-17 ID 143 APN 148-086-11 Steven Kennedy Lucia And Randy Fletcher Martha Baird 21381 Antigua Ln 21381 Breton Ln 21381 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 ID 175 APN 148-074-11 ID 214 APN 148-071-16 ID 122 APN 148-086-28 Stevenson Family Bart And Lisa Barrett Gordon And Patricia Akers 21381 Yarmouth Ln 21382 Breton Ln 21382 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 ID 154 APN 148-085-11 ID 185 APN 148-073-12 ID 76 APN 148-081-13 David Dominguez&Hiroe Tsukamoto James Griffith Kerry Shaw 21382 Seaforth Ln 21382 Yarmouth Ln 21391 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 ID 207 APN 148-073-16 ID 176 APN 148-074-12 ID 213 APN 148-071-17 Georgia Ziccardi Garen Hanlon Richard Jones 21391 Breton Ln 21391 Yarmouth Ln 21392 Breton Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 ID 121 APN 148-086-27 ID 153 APN 148-085-12 ID 184 APN 148-073-13 John Cleary Norman Ehrke Manuel Cadiz 21392 Sand Dollar Ln 21392 Seaforth Ln 21392 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7058 ID 77 APN 148-081-12 ID 208 APN 148-073-15 ID 145 APN 148-086-13 Keith Belew Ronald And Glona Walter Lawrence And Stacy Beebe 21401 Antigua Ln 21401 Breton Ln 21401 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7014 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7131 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7042 ID 212 APN 148-071-18 ID 152 APN 148-085-13 ID 183 APN 148-073-14 Arnold Rittberg Morris And Terne Spell Todd And Joelle Palombo 21402 Breton Ln 21402 Seaforth Ln 21402 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7132 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7043 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7060 ID 78 APN 148-081-11 ID 146 APN 148-086-14 ID 79 APN 148-081-10 Stanley And Lisa Bryson Steven Williams Walter Gunkel 21421 Antigua Ln 21421 Seaforth Ln 21431 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7014 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7042 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7014 ID 147 APN 148-086-15 ID 80 APN 148-081-09 ID 148 APN 148-086-16 Jerome And Jennifer Boroff Gay Boyer Dolores Ellison 21431 Seaforth Ln 21441 Antigua Ln 21441 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7042 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7014 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7042 ID 483 APN 148-011-07 ID 316 APN 114-481-04 ID 492 APN 148-121-23 Mills Land&Water Co Reta Cagle Samir S Luke 21471 Newland St 21572 Oakbrook Or Current Resident Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 Mission Viejo,CA 92692-3014 21632 Newland St Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 ttiquettes faciles a paler ; Repliez a la hachure afro de; t www.averycom 4 Utiltsez le abarit AVERYO 51600 i cham Sensement p- p de rev6ler le rebord Po U 7'" ' /0 1-800-GO-AVERY ' � J i �111� t 9141A/ld Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j ❑ AVERVO 51604D i ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 - Terence Nelson Cynthia Kelber John Andrews Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 1 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 10 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 11 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Christopher Chartier Jerry Vandermark Kelly Vandermark Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 11a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 12 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 12a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Deborah Sine Rick Sine Jordan Wallick Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 13 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 13a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 14 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Colleen Apgar Crystal Butcher Edward Cipres Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 15 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 16a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 17 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Elmer Smith Heather Newman Cheryl Dunlap Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 17a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 18 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 18a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Julie Grady Ronald Yocom Lester Elder Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 19 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 2 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 20a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7618 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Roger Byler Mary Baretich Nancy Agostini Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 22a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 23a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 2a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7618 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7618 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Deborah Bain John De Baun John Sturgeon Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 3 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 4 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 4a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Laura Stenhouse Margaret Mcgregor John Leeman Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 5a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 6a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 8 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 245 APN 149-013-01 Linda Leeman Ginya Paasch Clarence And June Ballenger Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21771 Kiowa Ln 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 8a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 9a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7833 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7620 ttiquettes faCiles a peter ® Repliez a la hachure afin de n�,� vuvuvu averycom Utilisez le abarit AVERY&51600 Sens de r6vdier le rebord Po U T"^ ' lam' 1-800-GO-AVERY '9 charaement P' P i j Easy Peel®Labels i A ® Bend along line to i Q ����$�® 5160® i Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge TM � � ID 300 APN 149 012-03 ID 301 APN 149-012-02 ID 247 APN 149-013-03 Donald Zaleski Alva And Magali Battenfield Louis Kastorff 21772 Kiowa Ln Rebelo Veloso 21801 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7834 21782 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7866 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7834 ID 302 APN 149-012-01 ID 248 APN 149-013-04 ID 249 APN 149-013-05 Shelly Gaertner Mary Surprenant Donald Holmes 21802 Kiowa Ln 21811 Kiowa Ln 21821 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7834 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7866 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7866 ID 303 APN 149-014-01 ID 304 APN 149-014-02 ID 305 APN 149-021-01 Michael And Jane Stracner Keith And Amy Seward Matthew And Angela Bellinger 21822 Kiowa Ln 21832 Kiowa Ln 21842 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7856 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7856 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7856 ID 252 APN 149-023-02 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Vinton Marriott Cynthia Crawford Joan Ferragano 21851 Kiowa Ln Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7866 21851 Newland St Spc 10 21851 Newland St Spc 101 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Richard Frazier Tanya Cantarella Jaclyn Willard Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 103 21851 Newland St Spc 105 21851 Newland St Spc 106 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Valerie Moeckel Debra Bartle Anthony Caputo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 110 21851 Newland St Spc 112 21851 Newland St Spc 113 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Michael Hiser Donald Moss Rae Berta Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 114 21851 Newland St Spc 115 21851 Newland St Spc 116 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7629 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Yoko Harada Arthur Guevara Kimberly Slaight Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 117 21851 Newland St Spc 118 21851 Newland St Spc 119 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Dawn Olmsted Merida Perez Marilyn Sammons Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 12 21851 Newland St Spc 120 21851 Newland St Spc 122 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7629 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 J Salisbury Rosario Roman Gloria Medrano Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 123 21851 Newland St Spc 125 21851 Newland St Spc 127 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 ttiquettes faciles A paler ARepliez A la hachure afin de wwwaverycom 10 Utilisez le gabant AVERY@ 51600 i Sens de r6vLler le rebord Pb U Tm C%At 1-800-GO-AVERY 9/4mlly charaement p" p t/D _�/ Easy Peel®Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to In � ��®5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper �® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM V ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Christopher Tran Sandy Brown Ian Mccollum Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident - 21851 Newland St Spc 128 21851 Newland St Spc 129 21851 Newland St Spc 130 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Suzi Holland Nora Vanderkallen Charles Uy Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 132 21851 Newland St Spc 133 21851 Newland St Spc 134 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Dona Patti Lora Walsh Patricia Porter Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 137 21851 Newland St Spc 138 21851 Newland St Spc 139 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Frances Avila Peter Nisson Patricia Osuna Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 14 21851 Newland St Spc 141 21851 Newland St Spc 142 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Tatum Fisher Amy Barr Victor Hupp Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 143 21851 Newland St Spc 145 21851 Newland St Spc 146 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7630 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Clarence Hallman Denise Marino Gilberto Tanguma Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 148 21851 Newland St Spc 149 21851 Newland St Spc 15 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7624 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Stuart Tedford Melanie Redd Christine Smith Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 150 21851 Newland St Spc 152 21851 Newland St Spc 153 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Susie Freestone Bruce Stafford Michael Gallegos Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 154 21851 Newland St Spc 155 21851 Newland St Spc 156 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Mollie Hill Christian Kraft Judy Frohock Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 158 21851 Newland St Spc 159 21851 Newland St Spc 160 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Andrew Chavez Amanda Boyum Andrew Mccaffrey Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 161 21851 Newland St Spc 162 21851 Newland St Spc 163 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Nquettes faciles 4 peter ; Rep6ez&la hachure afm de; n www.averycom �r Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 Sens de cargement r6veler le rebord Pop' p U TM ( 1-800-GO-AVERY l 9/ / Al h Easy Peel®Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to Q AVERY0 51600 Use AveryO Template 51600 j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 - Tammy Lough Pamela Saunders Timothy Kuroishi Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 164 21851 Newland St Spc 165 21851 Newland St Spc 166 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Frederick Martin Debra Ladouceur Jack Hastings Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 167 21851 Newland St Spc 168 21851 Newland St Spc 170 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Rolland Blackiston Steven Vaughan Annie Wiggins Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 171 21851 Newland St Spc 172 21851 Newland St Spc 173 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Kimberly Beebe Christopher Ablin Canssa Bisnar Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 175 21851 Newland St Spc 176 21851 Newland St Spc 177 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Jill Cheyne-roy Georgine Condon Donna Beasley Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 18 21851 Newland St Spc 180 21851 Newland St Spc 181 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7624 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Dale Ackerman William Moore Danielle Defeo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 182 21851 Newland St Spc 183 21851 Newland St Spc 184 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Arlene Baker James Buck Jorge Festini Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 185 21851 Newland St Spc 186 21851 Newland St Spc 187 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Russell Christensen Thomas Sutley Shelley Brower Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 188 21851 Newland St Spc 189 21851 Newland St Spc 19 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7625 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 David Martorelli David Post Sylvia Davanzo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 190 21851 Newland St Spc 191 21851 Newland St Spc 192 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Errol Lord Scott Wilson Chris Roth Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 193 21851 Newland St Spc 194 21851 Newland St Spc 196 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Etiquettes faciles h peter ; Rephez 8 la hachure afin de /)y� vuvwvaverycom Utilisez le abarit AVERY®51�I.Mlio 0 Sens de rLv6ler le rebord Pop-Up"T ' C�� 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 e charaement � t s / " Easy Peel®Labels i ® Bend along line to I Q ��®5160® i Use Avery®Template 51600 ; Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edge TM ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Erik Elstad Dolores Anderson Dan Wicks Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident - 21851 Newland St Spc 197 21851 Newland St Spc 198 21851 Newland St Spc 199 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Jakub Rozga George Barker Juanita Wood Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 1 a 21851 Newland St Spc 1 b 21851 Newland St Spc 2 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7642 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7642 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Ikuko Miyagi William Raymond Teresa Greenfield Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 20 21851 Newland St Spc 201 21851 Newland St Spc 202 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7625 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Sandra Epstein Timothy Fitzpatrick Judith Beteag Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 203 21851 Newland St Spc 204 21851 Newland St Spc 205 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Rita Sadler John Trant Janet Boyle Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 206 21851 Newland St Spc 207 21851 Newland St Spc 208 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Diane Coulter Sharlene Boatright Howard Freedman Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 21 21851 Newland St Spc 210 21851 Newland St Spc 211 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7625 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Mark Molloy Eric Daniel Teri Harkins Rd Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 212 21851 Newland St Spc 215 21851 Newland St Spc 217 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 John Paul Laurie Allen Lori Montez Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 218 21851 Newland St Spc 219 21851 Newland St Spc 220 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Francis Brannen Charles Pena Bob Smith Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 221 21851 Newland St Spc 222 21851 Newland St Spc 223 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Barbara Liscotti Johanna Meier Suzanne Sephton Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 225 21851 Newland St Spc 226 21851 Newland St Spc 228 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Etiquette5 facites h paler ; ® Repliez A la hachure afin de; www.avery.com (3 ; Utihsez le abarit AVERY®51600 Sens de rev6ler le rebord Po -U Tin ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 1 charge dent p p , 1 Easy Peeff Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to i Q A�MRYO 51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 , Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 - Mamie Duenas Elly Abapan Lee Gillespie Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident - 21851 Newland St Spc 229 21851 Newland St Spc 23 21851 Newland St Spc 234 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7625 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7636 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Jeanne Ferrara John Wendell Alice Mishica Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 235 21851 Newland St Spc 237 21851 Newland St Spc 24 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7626 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Barbara Nelson Scott Sprick Mary Wright Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 240 21851 Newland St Spc 241 21851 Newland St Spc 242 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7636 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 James Campbell Laurie Church Jamie Haig Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 244 21851 Newland St Spc 246 21851 Newland St Spc 247 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7636 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Doug Klaas Christopher Nielsen Kurt Hagan Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 248 21851 Newland St Spc 249 21851 Newland St Spc 25 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7626 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Kan Lavalley Maria Young Pamela Nelson Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 250 21851 Newland St Spc 252 21851 Newland St Spc 254 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Abbey Marks John Merrill Steven Woodward Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 255 21851 Newland St Spc 256 21851 Newland St Spc 257 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Mark Branco Henry Cargill Marjorie Ballinger Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 259 21851 Newland St Spc 26 21851 Newland St Spc 260 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7626 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Lawrence Nye Linda Brice Martha Sullivan Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 261 21851 Newland St Spc 262 21851 Newland St Spc 263 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Sabrina Haycock Sam Salib Lucas Wimer Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 268 21851 Newland St Spc 269 21851 Newland St Spc 27 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7627 9tiquettes fatiles A paler - Repliez a la hachure afro de i /�a www avery com (l r Utllisez le abarit AVERYO 51600 Sens de rdv6ler le rebord Po Up*'" ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 , chargement p- �� ��� t Easy Peele1 Labels A Bend along tine to a �$ ® 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ®®- expose Pop-Up EdgeT"' ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 - Krystalyn Franks Thomas Archer Thomas Pelk Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident - 21851 Newland St Spc 271 21851 Newland St Spc 274 21851 Newland St Spc 275 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Larry Parilla Teresa Gilliland Nanette Barress Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 276 21851 Newland St Spc 277 21851 Newland St Spc 278 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Debra Mendenhall Edwin Callaway Audrey Maratta Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 279 21851 Newland St Spc 28 21851 Newland St Spc 280 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7627 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 James Bibb Paul Sulzby Stephen Supola Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 281 21851 Newland St Spc 284 21851 Newland St Spc 287 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Cheryl Walsh Steven Vanover ,lure Reyes Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 288 21851 Newland St Spc 289 21851 Newland St Spc 29 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7627 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Vickie Flanagan Michael Sheridan Jeremy Loo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 291 21851 Newland St Spc 292 21851 Newland St Spc 296 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Barbara Banuelos Susan Robins James Pittman Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 297 21851 Newland St Spc 298 21851 Newland St Spc 299 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7639 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Karen Sampson Kyle Brown Charles Cook Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 30 21851 Newland St Spc 301 21851 Newland St Spc 302 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7640 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Carolyn Dick Carol Leblanc Jeffrey Klauza Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 305 21851 Newland St Spc 31 21851 Newland St Spc 312 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Craig Eggers June Moore Pamala Clifford Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 315 21851 Newland St Spc 32 21851 Newland St Spc 33 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Ittiquettes faciles 6 peter ® Rep6ez A la hachure af"in de www.avery.com jig Utihsez le gabarit AVERYO 51600 Sens de reveler le rebord Po -U T� 1-800-60-AVERY i AL) charclement p p 1 Easy Peel®Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to N ��ji�($Y® 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edger"" j i ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Franklin Harding Wayne Estabrook Barbara Howard Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 34 21851 Newland St Spc 35 21851 Newland St Spc 36 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Henry Field Rebecca Crouse Vicki Schlom Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 37 21851 Newland St Spc 38 21851 Newland St Spc 39 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Kathleen Millar Jonathan Tickenoff Stacey Lavoie Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 4 21851 Newland St Spc 40 21851 Newland St Spc 45 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7622 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 James Bertoni Tommasina Unto Jan Torrence Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 47 21851 Newland St Spc 48 21851 Newland St Spc 49 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Anne De Vusser Mary Massoth Jennian Beaver Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 50 21851 Newland St Spc 51 21851 Newland St Spc 52 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Louis Amerman Bruce Yelverton Vincent Hannan Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 53 21851 Newland St Spc 55 21851 Newland St Spc 56 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Mary Grisham D Draghi Scott Mccall Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 60 21851 Newland St Spc 61 21851 Newland St Spc 62 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Bradley Likich Micahel Slaton Rodney Hansen Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 63 21851 Newland St Spc 64 21851 Newland St Spc 65 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Michelle Bibb Robert Johnson Vincent Vancura Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 66 21851 Newland St Spc 67 21851 Newland St Spc 68 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Max Stimac James Meyling Linda Umbaugh Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 69 21851 Newland St Spc 7 21851 Newland St Spc 70 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 9tiquettes faciles e1 paler ; Repliez h la hachure afin de; www averycomSens de 'Lp Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 j chargement rCnreler le rebord Pop-UpTM 1-800-GO-AVERY '� Easy Peel('Labels i A Bend along line to i Q A R)FO 51600 Use Avery@ Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edgerm ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 - Janet Vincent William Trover Kevin Gassert Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident - 21851 Newland St Spc 73 21851 Newland St Spc 74 21851 Newland St Spc 75 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Jan Deady John Mcentire Jana Reeser Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 76 21851 Newland St Spc 77 21851 Newland St Spc 79 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Robert Lanshaw Kathie Hoffman Gary Herkner Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 81 21851 Newland St Spc 82 21851 Newland St Spc 83 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Michelle Tallman Michael Zappen Cynthia Montgomery Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 84 21851 Newland St Spc 85 21851 Newland St Spc 86 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Sandra Snell Shylo Hight Bobbie Gardner Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 87 21851 Newland St Spc 88 21851 Newland St Spc 89 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Melva Burton Dallas Herrold Paul Morrow Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 90 21851 Newland St Spc 91 21851 Newland St Spc 92 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Mary Moses Laura Brewster Alexander Rocco Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 94 21851 Newland St Spc 95 21851 Newland St Spc 96 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 306 APN 149-022-03 ID 254 APN 149-023-04 Rlchald Duffy David Nelson Richard And Cathy Svoboda Or Current Resident 21862 Kiowa Ln 21871 Kiowa Ln 21851 Newland St Spc 98 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7855 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7835 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 362 APN 149-011-05 ID 307 APN 149-022-02 ID 255 APN 149-023-05 Stanley Chen Maria Priddy Darnel Malloy 21872 Harborbreeze Ln 21872 Kiowa Ln 21881 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8253 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7855 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7835 ID 308 APN 149-022-01 ID 95 APN 148-082-20 ID 256 APN 149-023-06 Frances Martin Robert Browning Michele Erwin 21882 Kiowa Ln 21882 Oceanview Ln 21891 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7855 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8217 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7835 Etiquettes faciles a peter ; ® Repliez 8 la hachure afin de; www.averycom - Utilisez le abartt AVERY®5160® Sens de reveler le rebord Po U TM ' 02� 1-800-GO-AVERY ' g chargement p p 1 /- d �IavllC /0 -0// Easy Peel®Labels ® ® Bend along line to � (j�® 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM l ID 485 APN 114-150-81 ID 488 APN 114-160-86 ID 257 APN 149-023-07 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Teresa J Lee 21900 Pacific Coast Hwy 21900 Pacific Coast Hwy 21901 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7835 ID 149 APN 148-081-01 ID 309 APN 149-024-03 ID 258 APN 149-023-08 Teresa Lee Brent And Janet Kooiman Kenneth Fornster 21901 Kiowa Ln 21902 Kiowa Ln Elizabeth C Gillett Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7836 21911 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7837 ID 310 APN 149-024-02 ID 259 APN 149-023-09 ID 311 APN 149-024-01 Kim Kellner Florence Howard Alan Bramlett 21912 Kiowa Ln 21931 Kiowa Ln 21932 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7836 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7836 ID 260 APN 149-023-10 ID 261 APN 149-023-11 ID 330 APN 114-482-01 Fares And Nabila Jahshan Donald Mckinney Mary Arnold 21941 Kiowa Ln 21961 Kiowa Ln 22002 Susan Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID 276 APN 114-481-12 ID 264 APN 114-481-15 ID 393 APN 114-482-17 John Graves&Kay Melinda Judy Lenihan Michael And Donna Tryon 22012 Hula Cir 22021 Hula Cir 22021 Surfrider Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 ID 314 APN 114-481-02 ID 275 APN 114-481-11 ID 329 APN 114-482-02 Lisa Howell Kathleen Mooney Oanh Mai&Thao Ho 22021 Susan Ln 22022 Hula Cir 22022 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8305 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID 288 APN 149-031-07 ID 392 APN 114-482-16 ID 328 APN 114-482-03 D And K Coffman David Cragun AI Gabnon 22031 Jonesport Ln 22031 Surfrider Ln Julie Nevins-gabnon Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8422 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8344 22032 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID 391 APN 114-482-15 ID 274 APN 114-481-10 ID 327 APN 114-482-04 Richard Mast Dorothy Riley Oliver Thayer 22041 Surfrider Ln 22042 Hula Cir 22042 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID 266 APN 114-481-17 ID 390 APN 114-482-14 ID 273 APN 114-481-09 Israel Reyngold Thomas And Catherine Mortimer John And Dana Ryan 22051 Hula Cir 22051 Surfrider Ln 22052 Hula Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 ID 326 APN 114-482-05 ID 389 APN 114-482-13 ID 317 APN 114481-05 Gale Hillis&Virginia A Hills Jeane Fleming Raymond And Charlene Cole 22052 Susan Ln 22061 Surfrider Ln 22061 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8305 ttiquettes faciles d peter ; ® Repiiez a la hachure afin de i C ,/ www averytom f i - Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600/ Sens de reveler le rebord Po -U TM ' (' �f- 1- GO-GO-AVERY 99 chargement p p �� Easy Peep labels ® ® Bend along line to a /!,®/E��p 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 , Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j ID 267 APN 114-481-18 ID 272 APN 114-481-08 ID 388 APN 114-482-12 Kenneth Kimball Ellen White Susan Anderson 22071 Hula Cir 22072 Hula Cir 22081 Surfrider Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8344 ID 319 APN 114-481-07 ID 523 APN 114-150-78 ID 189 APN 148-073-08 Leonard And Rebecca Lopez Cannery Hamilton Properties Llc David Sutton 22091 Susan Ln 2222 Martin Ste 255 245 Clipper Way Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8305 Irvine,CA 92612-1481 Seal Beach, CA 90740-5955 ID 500 APN 148-121-19 ID 163 APN 148-085-02 ID 236 APN 149-031-24 H&Z Investments Lic Erika Nollau Warren Biscailuz Saghafi Hamid 2620 Cody Cir 28237 Sw Wagner St 25352 Hillary Ln Las Cruces, NM 88011-9079 Wilsonville, OR 97070-6784 Laguna Hills, CA 92653-5217 ID 522 APN 114-150-28 ID 459 APN 114-150-62 ID 387 APN 114-482-11 Orange County Flood Control Dist State Of California Parks&Rec Robert Merritt 300 N Flower St#6 3030 Avenida Del Presidente 31886 Via Pato Santa Ana, CA 92703-5000 San Clemente,CA 92672-4433 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679-4129 ID 369 APN 149-041-11 ID 33 APN 148-044-05 ID 65 APN 148-081-24 Kerry Roth Alejandro Arredondo Laverne Spence 32031 Via Flores 3218 S Deegan Dr 3300 Irvine Ave Ste 270 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-3808 Santa Ana,CA 92704-6615 Newport Beach, CA 92660-3111 ID 464 APN 114-150-58 ID 21 APN 148-044-01 ID 313 APN 114-481-01 State Of California Dept Of Tran William And Alicia Almeida Terence Boston 3337 Michelson Dr Ste 380 3375 Marigold Cir 3501 Jamboree Rd#301 Irvine, CA 92612-8894 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1724 Newport Beach,CA 92660-2939 ID 251 APN 149-023-01 ID 187 APN 148-073-10 ID 177 APN 148-074-13 Lee Hupp Wesley Smith Barbara Hennesey 35225 Linda Rosea Rd 3530 Damien Ave Spc 7 414 El Modena Ave Temecula, CA 92592-9531 La Verne,CA 91750-3207 Newport Beach, CA 92663-5113 ID 161 APN 148-085-04 ID 253 APN 149-023-03 ID 382 APN 149-023-16 Raymond And Carol Millard Lilly Wittman Amber Wagner 42303 Highway 200 4651 W Crestview Cir 5526 W Dorothea Ave Hope, ID 83836-9785 Tucson,AZ 85745-9207 Visalia, CA 93277-6414 ID 144 APN 148-086-12 ID 533 APN 148-041-51 ID 527 APN 114-150-36 Joseph Buszek Bonanni Properties&D S Products Pacific Terminals Llc 5607 Chadwick Rd 5622 Research Dr 5900 Cherry Ave Mission, KS 66205-2628 Huntington Beach,CA 92649-1633 Long Beach, CA 90805-4408 ID 526 APN 114-150-75 ID 29 APN 148-043-43 ID 498 APN 148-121-21 Cannery Hamilton Properties Lic David Oakley Arthur Brimlow 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd 6251 Moonfield Dr 652 E Culver Ave San Ramon, CA 94583-2324 Huntington Beach,CA 92648-1039 Orange, CA 92866-2054 Etiquettes faciles 8 paler ARepliez A la hachure afin de C�'640 www avery com o� Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 Sens de r6v6ler le rebord Pop" P U Tm ' ( 1-800-GO-AVERY 9ladlld chargement `/ Easy Peelw Labels i A ® Bend along line to Q �►�1$Y®5160® Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM 1 ID 250 APN 149-013-06 ID 315 APN 114-481-03 ID 496 APN 148-121-01 James Wright Jan Downs&Charles Javer Fein Properties Llc _ 703 Concord St 709 N Camden Dr 714 Oceanhill Dr Santa Ana, CA 92701-3203 Beverly Hills,CA 90210-3204 Huntington Beach, CA 92648-3741 ID 71 APN 148-081-18 ID 25 APN 148-044-29 ID 58 APN 148-043-34 Kst Water Management Llc Alejandro Arredondo Stephen Garcia 8068 Canyon Creek Cir Rosa M Vizcarra 8342 Kingfisher Dr Pleasanton, CA 94588-4764 826 S Orange Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92646-5548 Santa Ana,CA 92701-5848 ID 22 APN 148-043-46 ID 20 APN 148-044-30 ID 23 APN 148-043-45 Philip Snowden Tran Su Hong&Thu Pham Harvey Feinstein 8361 Doncaster Dr 8361 Lomond Dr 8371 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6904 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6911 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6904 ID 24 APN 148-044-02 ID 1 APN 148-041-43 ID 28 APN 148-043-44 John And Mary Koch Thomas Kuhn Eugen And Irma Desmet 8372 Doncaster Dr 8376 Terranova Cir 8381 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6905 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7644 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6904 ID 26 APN 148-044-28 ID 27 APN 148-044-03 ID 2 APN 148-041-44 Doris Bailey Xuan Vu&Ngoc Tran Dong Shim 8381 Lomond Dr 8382 Doncaster Dr 8386 Terranova Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6911 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6905 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7644 ID 31 APN 148-044-27 ID 30 APN 148-044-04 ID 34 APN 148-043-42 Michael And Blaine Brinsfield Ryan Schomberg&Suzanne Medeiros Toshiko Takahashi Spencer T Gilpatrick 8392 Doncaster Dr 8401 Doncaster Dr 8391 Lomond Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6905 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6911 ID 32 APN 148-044-26 ID 5 APN 148-041-46 ID 35 APN 148-043-41 Richard And Audrey Powers Tuan And Kathy Pham Samuel Stockinger 8401 Lomond Dr 8406 Terranova Cir Joni L Valley-stockinger Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7646 8411 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 ID 36 APN 148-044-06 ID 6 APN 148-041-47 ID 40 APN 148-043-40 Brian Teague Toan&Thang T Dam Robert And Kelhe Stirrat 8412 Doncaster Dr 8416 Terranova Cir 8421 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 ID 38 APN 148-044-24 ID 39 APN 148-044-07 ID 7 APN 148-041-48 David And Vanessa Molinan Bruce Marble Nina Nguyen 8421 Lomond Dr 8422 Doncaster Dr 8426 Terranova Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7646 ID 41 APN 148-043-39 ID 43 APN 148-044-23 ID 42 APN 148-044-08 Richard And Angelina Johnson George Tripp Lary And Barbara Zwart 8431 Doncaster Dr 8431 Lomond Dr 8432 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 Etiquettes faciles 8 paler - Repliez A la hachure afrn de www avery corn Lo Utilisez le gabarit AVERI(®5160® ch Sens deargement r�v�ler re rebord Pop' p U TM ' � t / 1- GO-GO-AVERY ' 1 , '/!/i Easy Peel''Labels A ® Bend along line to o AVERYO 516019 i Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edge— ID 46 APN 148-043-38 ID 44 APN 148-044-22 ID 19 APN 148-041-50 Patricia Marshall Anthony And Kim Aschenbrenner Joseph Szenyen 8441 Doncaster Dr 8441 Lomond Dr 8446 Terranova Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7646 ID 47 APN 148-043-37 ID 49 APN 148-044-21 ID 48 APN 148-044-10 Kevin And Debbie Williams Victor M Martinez Walter Stossier 8447 Doncaster Dr 8447 Lomond Dr 8448 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6906 ID 52 APN 148-043-36 ID 50 APN 148-044-20 ID 51 APN 148-044-11 Larry And Marie Doran Michael And Sharon Talbutt James Tsusaki 8451 Doncaster Dr 8451 Lomond Dr 8452 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6906 ID 53 APN 148-043-35 ID 54 APN 148-044-12 ID 56 APN 148-044-18 Greig James W II Dept Of Vets Affairs Of State Of CA T And Leighton Pederson Karen L Isaacs-greig 8462 Doncaster Dr 8471 Lomond Dr 8461 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6903 ID 57 APN 148-044-13 ID 59 APN 148-043-33 ID 61 APN 148-044-17 Daniel And Mary Barnett Maureen Mills Jose Rodriguez&Corona 8472 Doncaster Dr 8481 Doncaster Dr 8481 Lomond Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 ID 64 APN 148-043-32 ID 62 APN 148-044-16 ID 63 APN 148-044-15 Patrick Szafirski Alice Loftis Doncaster Street Trust 8491 Doncaster Dr 8491 Lomond Dr 8492 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 ID 81 APN 148-081-07 ID 86 APN 148-082-11 ID 84 APN 148-086-21 Wayne A Lewis Aileen Nguyen Aline Schaum 8512 Sandy Hook Dr 8521 Milne Dr 8521 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7005 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 ID 85 APN 148-086-22 ID 82 APN 148-081-06 ID 83 APN 148-081-06 Jason And Leilen Shelton Christian D Ambra D Christian 8522 Milne Dr 8522 Sandy Hook Dr 8522 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 ID 107 APN 148-082-33 ID 110 APN 148-086-20 ID 109 APN 148-086-23 Edward Williams Jerry Wells Michael Dangott 8531 Milne Dr 8531 Sandy Hook Dr 8532 Milne Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7005 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7006 ID 111 APN 148-081-05 ID 108 APN 148-082-32 ID 113 APN 148-086-19 Cathy Cowger Jean Ickhan Donald Stack 8532 Sandy Hook Dr 8541 Milne Dr 8541 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7005 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 Ertiquettes faciles a peter ; ® Repliez A la hachure of n de j www.avery com -14 Utdisez le gabarit AVERI(®51600 ' Sens nement rdveler le rebord Pop-up TM ' 014e"' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9/�AD 1 Easy Peele'Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to Q AVERYO 516040 Use Avery®Template 51600 1 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM ID 114 APN 148-086-24 ID 112 APN 148-081-04 ID 499 APN 148-121-20 Ronald Fox Ryan And Carol Drumm H&Z Investments Llc 8542 Milne Dr 8542 Sandy Hook Dr 8551 Edison Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92648-3741 ID 116 APN 148-086-18 ID 115 APN 148-086-25 ID 117 APN 148-081-03 Andrew And Marilyn Bumatay Reynaldo And Lourdes Lopez Leslie Jepsen 8551 Sandy Hook Dr 8552 Milne Dr 8552 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 ID 119 APN 148-086-17 ID 120 APN 148-086-26 ID 118 APN 148-081-02 Joann Dickens Refugio Apodaca Steve Mc Kendry 8561 Sandy Hook Dr 8562 Milne Dr 8562 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 ID 37 APN 148-044-25 ID 323 APN 114-482-08 ID 150 APN 148-071-28 James Thies Shigeko Hosokawa Charles Lindsay 8563 Amazon River Cir 8570 Rock Fish Cir 8622 Hatteras Dr Fountain Valley, CA 92708-5510 Fountain Valley, CA 92708-5006 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 ID 151 APN 148-071-27 ID 178 APN 148-071-26 ID 179 APN 148-071-25 Brian And Suzanne Geisert Richard And Yvonne Button Michael Goldstein 8632 Hatteras Dr 8642 Hatteras Dr 8652 Hatteras Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7024 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 ID 180 APN 148-071-24 ID 181 APN 148-071-23 ID 182 APN 148-071-22 Joann Stevens Leon Hart Michael And Jena Buono 8662 Hatteras Dr 8682 Hatteras Dr Lynn Jena Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 8692 Hatteras Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7024 ID 209 APN 148-071-21 ID 211 APN 148-071-19 ID 341 APN 149-011-04 Patricia Tessier Billy And Robin Humphries Albert Ashurst 8702 Hatteras Dr 8732 Hatteras Dr 8886 Plumas Cir Unit 1122c Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7025 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7025 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-5766 ID 325 APN 114-482-06 ID 240 APN 149-041-16 ID 244 APN 149-011-01 Jack Byrd Rodney And Patricia Magsanide Dominic Menaldi 8915 Woodlawn Dr 9001 Adelia Cir 9001 Bermuda Dr Granbury, TX 76049-4404 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7812 ID 238 APN 149-031-40 ID 234 APN 149-031-08 ID 242 APN 149-041-32 Devin And Danna Chase James And Elsa Harrington Tad And Nancy Buchoz 9001 Niguel Cir 9001 Regatta Dr 9001 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7847 ID 241 APN 149-041-17 ID 237 APN 149-031-25 ID 268 APN 114-481-19 Lydia King Janet Wineland Richard Mortimer 9002 Adelia Cir 9002 Bobbie Cir 9002 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Etiquettes faciles i paler ; ® Repliez h la hachure afin de; www avery com Z-7,, i Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® charpement 51601D Sens de reveller le rebord Pop-UpTM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY 9/�/�� A �/� 1 Easy Peel®Labels A ® Bend along line to o /��/���� 5160® i Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j ID 239 APN 149-041-01 ID 235 APN 149-031-09 ID 243 APN 149-041-33 William And Darlene Wall Francile Juhl Shirlee Earley 9002 Niguel Or 9002 Regatta Dr 9002 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7848 ID 269 APN 114-481-20 ID 282 APN 149-041-15 ID 278 APN 149-011-02 David And Deanna Wagester Donald Churchward Guy Adams 9012 Christine Dr 9021 Adelia Cir 9021 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 ID 286 APN 149-031-23 ID 284 APN 149-031-39 ID 280 APN 149-041-31 Steven And Debra Clark James And Deborah Zisch Powell Odie L 3rd 9021 Bobbie Cir 9021 Niguel Cir 9021 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7847 ID 281 APN 149-041-18 ID 277 APN 149-023-12 ID 285 APN 149-031-26 Terry Finley Richard Kilekas Sandra Tyler 9022 Adelia Cir 9022 Aloha Dr 9022 Bobble Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 ID 270 APN 114-481-21 ID 283 APN 149-041-02 ID 287 APN 149-031-10 Kourosh And Fanba Khavan Christopher And Mauren Moore Lynn Davis Bekki 9022 Christine Dr 9022 Niguel Cir 9022 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 ID 279 APN 149-041-34 ID 295 APN 149-041-14 ID 299 APN 149-011-03 Nasser And Jennifer Mustafa Patrick Beachner Ronald And Karen Jett 9022 Rhodesia Dr 9031 Adelia Cir 9031 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7812 ID 293 APN 149-031-38 ID 289 APN 149-031-06 ID 297 APN 149-041-30 Christopher Young Leon Madnick David Archibald 9031 Niguel Cir 9031 Regatta Dr 9031 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7847 ID 296 APN 149-041-19 ID 292 APN 149-031-27 ID 271 APN 114-481-22 Jerre Kuns Shawn And Elisha Roth Keith Tucker 9032 Adelia Cir 9032 Bobbie Cir 9032 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 ID 294 APN 149-041-03 ID 290 APN 149-031-11 ID 298 APN 149-041-35 John Oschman George Johnson C And L Peterson 9032 Niguel Cir 9032 Regatta Dr 9032 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 ID 345 APN 149-041-13 ID 349 APN 149-031-21 ID 347 APN 149-031-37 Brogdon Edward Velazquez Michael White&Catherine De Ceglie 9041 Adelia Cir 9041 Bobbie Cir 9041 Niguel Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 ttiquettes faciles A peter ; ® Repliez a la hachure afin de; www avery com AVERY reveler le rebord Po Z2f Utilisez le abarit @ 5160® i Sens de 1-800-GO-AVERY g �/diO chargement FopTM J 1 Easy PeelQ9 Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to � (��® 5160� i Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTI" , b _ ID 351 APN 149-031-05 ID 343 APN 149-041-29 ID 344 APN 149-041-20 Kevin And Rebecca Broussard Bruce And Julie Barros E And V Moynagh _ 9041 Regatta Dr 9041 Rhodesia Dr 9042 Adelia Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 ID 312 APN 149-023-13 ID 348 APN 149-031-28 ID 320 APN 114-481-23 Manuel Urzua Eric Laipenieks Stanley Marriott 9042 Aloha Dr 9042 Bobbie Cir 9042 Christine Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7802 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8314 ID 346 APN 149-041-04 ID 350 APN 149-031-12 ID 342 APN 149-041-36 Sullivan Family Kenneth Crites Robert Norquist 9042 Niguel Cir 9042 Regatta Dr 9042 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 ID 331 APN 149-023-14 ID 321 APN 114-481-24 ID 358 APN 149-041-12 Ralph Osterkamp Philip And Suzanne Beukema May Zirbel 9052 Aloha Dr 9052 Christine Dr 9061 Adelia Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 ID 333 APN 149-024-27 ID 354 APN 149-031-20 ID 335 APN 149-022-27 Henry Kerfoot Gann And Rosario Payne Steve Gingrich 9061 Aloha Dr 9061 Bobbie Cir 9061 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7801 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7829 ID 337 APN 149-021-02 ID 356 APN 149-031-36 ID 352 APN 149-031-04 Jude Olivas Darren Magot Jerry And Denise Gutierrez 9061 Mahalo Dr 9061 Niguel Cir 9061 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7838 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 ID 360 APN 149-041-28 ID 359 APN 149-041-21 ID 332 APN 149-023-15 Robert And Paula Brown Carolyn Crockett Richard Legere 9061 Rhodesia Dr 9062 Adelia Cir 9062 Aloha Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7802 ID 340 APN 149-012-04 ID 355 APN 149-031-29 ID 338 APN 149-014-03 Robert Dayyat John And Sonia Villa Richard Loy 9062 Bermuda Dr 9062 Bobbie Cir 9062 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7813 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7819 ID 334 APN 149-024-04 ID 336 APN 149-022-04 ID 357 APN 149-041-05 Daniel And Shen Rawlins John Engh David And Pamela Chapman 9062 Kapaa Dr 9062 Mahalo Dr 9062 Niguel Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7830 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 ID 353 APN 149-031-13 ID 361 APN 149-041-37 ID 381 APN 149-024-26 Don Kim Scott Swanson George Bullock 9062 Regatta Dr 9062 Rhodesia Dr 9071 Aloha Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7801 l tiquettes faciles 8 paler Sens de Rephez 6 la hachure afin de C. ! WWWAverycom Z� Utilisez le gabarit AVERIr®51600/ chargement r6v6ler le rebord Pop-UpTM �n 1-800-GO-AVERY i /7} d 0 —`� Easy Peel®Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to © /� (��®5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge A 1 ID 365 APN 149-031-19 ID 383 APN 114-482-09 ID 379 APN 149-022-26 Mary Sindel Malcolm And Marianne Mac Kenzie Jason And J Pyle 9071 Bobbie Cir 9071 Chnstine Dr 9071 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8313 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7829 ID 367 APN 149-031-35 ID 363 APN 149-031-03 ID 370 APN 149-041-22 Samuel And Pamela Lafata Karl And Heidi Tahti Lenora Raia 9071 Niguel Cir 9071 Regatta Dr 9072 Adelia Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 ID 366 APN 149-031-30 ID 384 APN 114-481-26 ID 380 APN 149-024-05 Kenneth Roberts Karl Wysocki Enkka Thompson 9072 Bobbie Cir 9072 Christine Dr 9072 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7830 ID 378 APN 149-022-05 ID 368 APN 149-041-06 ID 364 APN 149-031-14 Gino And Jenny Angelici Raymond Zajac Edmund Moreno 9072 Mahalo Dr 9072 Niguel Cir 9072 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 ID 3712 APN 149-041-38 ID 408 APN 149-041-10 ID 396 APN 149-024-25 Richard Smyser Edward And Yvette Arango Shirlee Stroner 9072 Rhodesia Dr 9081 Adelia Cir 9081 Aloha Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7801 ID 373 APN 149-011-06 ID 412 APN 149-031-18 ID 386 APN 114-482-10 James Olsen Gunnar Industries Ltd Steven Hayes 9081 Bermuda Dr 9081 Bobbie Cir 9081 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8313 ID 375 APN 149-012-26 ID 398 APN 149-022-25 ID 377 APN 149-021-03 Brian Hunter Gordon Emerson Robert Frye 9081 Kahului Dr 9081 Kapaa Dr 9081 Mahalo Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7818 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7829 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7838 ID 410 APN 149-031-34 ID 414 APN 149-031-02 ID 406 APN 149-041-26 John Sheedy Mark Bowman Chris Ogawa 9081 Niguel Cir 9081 Regatta Dr 9081 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 ID 407 APN 149-041-23 ID 374 APN 149-012-05 ID 411 APN 149-031-31 Richard And Roslyn Bashore Robert And Constance Mclin David And Kristine Wetzel 9082 Adelia Cir 9082 Bermuda Dr 9082 Bobbie Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7813 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 ID 385 APN 114-481-27 ID 399 APN 149-022-06 ID 409 APN 149-041-07 Foad Jahansouz&Maureen R Connolly Fast James A John Kaufmann 9082 Christine Dr 9082 Mahalo Dr 9082 Niguel Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Etiquettes faciles a peter ; A Rephez 6 la hachure afin de 1 �� www.avety.com '- Utdisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de rf v6ler le rebord Po U TM 1 1-800-GO-AVERY ' charaement p- p I ,/ a Easy Peel®Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to i a ANMRY® 51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 , Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edge'rm j ID 413 APN 149-031-15 ID 405 APN 149-041-39 ID 339 APN 149-012-27 Robert And Lorraine Low Irene lannitti Neal Rieffanaugh _ 9082 Regatta Dr 9082 Rhodesia Dr 909 Tiller Way Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625-1649 ID 421 APN 149-041-09 ID 404 APN 149-011-07 ID 417 APN 149-031-17 Kevin And Enka Kelley Tuan Tran Kim And Daniel Healy 9091 Adelia Cir 9091 Bermuda Dr 9091 Bobble Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 ID 402 APN 149-012-25 ID 431 APN 149-022-24 ID 400 APN 149-021-04 Walter And Carolyn Coyle Kenneth Whitehead Douglas And Lisa Ahuero 9091 Kahului Dr 9091 Kapaa Dr 9091 Mahalo Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7818 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7829 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7838 ID 419 APN 149-031-33 ID 415 APN 149-031-01 ID 423 APN 149-041-25 Thomas And Constance Bowles Joseph And Maria Young William Lacey 9091 Niguel Cir 9091 Regatta Dr 9091 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 ID 422 APN 149-041-24 ID 395 APN 149-023-17 ID 403 APN 149-012-06 Stevenson Family Stephen Willerth Scott Tracy 9092 Adelia Cir 9092 Aloha Dr Carmen Bridge Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 9092 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7813 ID 418 APN 149-031-32 ID 401 APN 149-014-05 ID 432 APN 149-024-07 William And Carol Ward Martha Kwan Allen Wachi 9092 Bobbie Cir 9092 Kahului Dr 9092 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7819 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7830 ID 430 APN 149-022-07 ID 420 APN 149-041-08 ID 416 APN 149-031-16 Stephen And Dorothy Brinkerhoff Michael Grossman Lorraine Lachapelle 9092 Mahalo Dr 9092 Niguel Cir 9092 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 ID 424 APN 149-041-40 ID 437 APN 149-024-23 ID 425 APN 149-011-08 Betty Wells Maida Seymour Anthony And Stella Zografides 9092 Rhodesia Dr 9101 Aloha Dr 9101 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7865 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7862 ID 427 APN 149-012-24 ID 439 APN 149-022-23 ID 429 APN 149-021-05 Donald And Joan Schlieter Donald Swords Harold Loomis 9101 Kahului Dr 9101 Kapaa Dr 9101 Mahalo Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7820 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7864 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7863 ID 434 APN 149-023-18 ID 426 APN 149-012-07 ID 428 APN 149-014-06 Herman Chenier Dennis Mc Donald Mark And Bettina Carnahan 9102 Aloha Dr 9102 Bermuda Dr 9102 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7804 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7815 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7825 Etiquettes faciles A paler ; Repliez h la hachure afin de; WWWWAvery com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 516�12.d 0 cha gement r6v6ler le rebord Pop-UpTM j 1-800-GO-AVERY 116 �� ��� Easy Peel®Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to o � ($�®5160® Use Avery® ^"Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edge* ID 438 APN 149-024-08 ID 394 APN 114-482-18 ID 446 APN 149-041-41 Donald Davidson Christopher Condon Mark And Christine Mc Donell 9102 Kapaa Dr 9102 Playa Dr 9102 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7832 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8317 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7849 ID 456 APN 149-024-22 ID 445 APN 149-011-09 ID 443 APN 149-012-23 Alan And Enca Walencewicz William Stilwell Elizabeth Parkovich 9111 Aloha Dr 9111 Bermuda Dr 9111 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7865 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7862 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7820 ID 436 APN 149-023-19 ID 444 APN 149-012-08 ID 442 APN 149-014-07 Mark And Susan Semon Frederick Waterfall Rose And Michael Thurston 9112 Aloha Dr 9112 Bermuda Dr 9112 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7804 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7815 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7825 ID 455 APN 149-024-09 ID 453 APN 149-022-09 ID 435 APN 114-482-19 Ludele Jenkins Paul Strain Joe And Rita Croom 9112 Kapaa Dr 9112 Mahalo Dr Almanza Rita Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7832 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7841 9112 Playa Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-8317 ID 447 APN 149-041-42 ID 448 APN 149-011-10 ID 450 APN 149-012-22 Evangeline Rentas Kent Mc Garrigle Ole Oleson 9112 Rhodesia Dr 9121 Bermuda Dr 9121 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7849 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7862 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7820 ID 14 APN 148-041-08 ID 457 APN 149-023-20 ID 322 APN 114-481-25 Mortimer Shea Neil And Lori Wells Robert Dutton 9121 Kapaa Dr 9122 Aloha Dr 9122 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7864 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7804 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8316 ID 528 APN 114-160-82 ID 451 APN 149-014-08 ID 458 APN 114-493-31 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy J Kirkorn Quang Nguyen 9122 Kahului Dr 9122 Kahului Dr 9122 Playa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7825 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7825 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8317 ID 210 APN 148-071-20 ID 60 APN 148-044-14 ID 18 APN 148-041-49 Martha Gamble Scott Underhill Phat Nguyen 9502 Smokey Cir 9881 Oceancrest Dr 9934 Thistle Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92646-5362 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8201 Fountain Valley, CA 92708-2044 34481- ID 460 APN 114-150-50 ID 532 APN 114- ID 3 APN 148-041-45 State Of Calif Dept Of Public Works City Of Huntington Beach Seaside Terrace Inc Po Box 187000 Real Estate Services Div Po Box 3171 Sacramento, CA 95818-7000 Po Box 190 Cypress,CA 90630-7171 Huntington Beach,CA 92648-0190 ID 134 APN 148-086-02 1D 87 APN 148-082-12 ID 263 APN 114-481-14 Gunvor Aanensen Donald Pattison&Audrey E James Gary Gumbert Po Box 4108 Po Box 414 Po Box 483 Newport Beach,CA 92661-4108 Claremont,CA 91711-0414 Surfside,CA 90743-0483 Etiquettes faciles 6 peter Sens de Repliez 6 la hachure afin de www.averycom 2-1 Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 charaement r6v6ler le rebord Pop-UpTM j 1-800-GO-AVERY i Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to Q /��(�V® 51600 i Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edgerm ID 291 APN 149-031-22 ID 265 APN 114-481-16 ID 515 APN 114-150-63 Henry And Torn Baez Frank And Michelle Gandara Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy _ Po Box 5460 Po Box 5461 Po Box 5903 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5460 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5461 Huntington Beach, CA 92615-5903 ID 516 APN 114-160-86 ID 517 APN 114-160-75 ID 518 APN 114-160-70 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Po Box 5903 Po Box 5903 Po Box 5903 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 ID 519 APN 114-160-84 ID 397 APN 149-024-06 ID 371 APN 149-041-27 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Yung Pan Ralph Silva Po Box 5903 Po Box 6094 Po Box 6756 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-6094 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-6756 - ID 324 APN 114-482-07 J Johnston ID APN ID APN Po Box 7932 - Newport Beach, CA 92658-7932 ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN 9/j, 1quettes faciies A peler ; A Rephez A la hachure afin de vaww avery com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 chaeraemant reveler le rebord Pop-UPTM i 1-800-GO-AVERY Z� i Easy Peel®Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to o /� ® 5160� Use Avery®Template 51600 Peed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM J ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Occupant 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 14a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 15a 21730 Newland St Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7612 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 16 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 20 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 21 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 5 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 6 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 7 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 _ ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 9 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 10a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 1 a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 3a 21851 Newland St Spc 126 21851 Newland St Spc 131 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Occupant Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 136 21871 Newland St Ofc 21851 Newland St Spc 57 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7617 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 58 21851 Newland St Spc 59 21851 Newland St Spc 71 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 72 21851 Newland St Spc 80 21851 Newland St Spc 93 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 99 21851 Newland St Spc 5 21851 Newland St Spc 6 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7622 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7622 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 11 21851 Newland St Spc 8 21851 Newland St Spc 16 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7624 Etiquettes faciles A peter ; Repliez h la hachure afin de; /— vvww.averycom Utdisez le abarit AVERY6 51600 Sens de reveler le rebord Po Tm ' 1-800-GO-AVERY 9 ��/1 charaement P-UP , a i 9 ,) / Easy Peel®Labels ♦ Bend along line to � ��® 5160® Use Avery @ Template 51600 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-up Edger. , j ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 17 21851 Newland St Spc 41 21851 Newland St Spc 42 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7624 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 43 21851 Newland St Spc 44 21851 Newland St Spc 46 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 102 21851 Newland St Spc 104 21851 Newland St Spc 107 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 108 21851 Newland St Spc 109 21851 Newland St Spc 124 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 140 21851 Newland St Spc 144 21851 Newland St Spc 147 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 151 21851 Newland St Spc 179 21851 Newland St Spc 195 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 200 21851 Newland St Spc 290 21851 Newland St Spc 216 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 224 21851 Newland St Spc 227 21851 Newland St Spc 230 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 232 21851 Newland St Spc 233 21851 Newland St Spc 236 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 238 21851 Newland St Spc 239 21851 Newland St Spc 243 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 ftiquettes faciles 6 peter ; Repliez h la hachure afin de; i'`� www.averycom Utdisez le abarit AVERY®5160® i Sens de reveler le rebord Pop_UpTM 800GOAVERY-U TM ' 1- - - ' 9 ��� / � chamement p p 1 Easy Peel®Labels A Bend along line to � Q AVERY® 51600 Use AveryO Template 51600 J Feed Paper � expose Pop-Up Edgerm ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 245 21851 Newland St Spc 251 21851 Newland St Spc 258 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 264 21851 Newland St Spc 265 21851 Newland St Spc 266 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 270 21851 Newland St Spc 272 21851 Newland St Spc 273 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 282 21851 Newland St Spc 283 21851 Newland St Spc 285 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 286 21851 Newland St Spc 300 21851 Newland St Spc 303 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7640 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 306 21851 Newland St Spc 310 21851 Newland St Spc 311 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 313 21851 Newland St Spc 314 21851 Newland St Spc 1 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7642 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 507 APN Resident Resident ID APN 21851 Newland St Spc 3 8641 Edison Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7642 Huntington Beach, CA 92648-3741 ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN >tiquettes faciles a peter A Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com f Utdisez le gabant AVERY@ 5160® Sens de rev6ler le rebord Pop-Up*m ' 1-800-GO-AVERY chargement t t Easy Peel`'Labels A Bend along line to Q AVERS`® 51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 , Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edger^" j State Clearinghouse Ricky Ramos Tom Luster, Environmental Scientist State of CA Governor's Office of Planning City of Huntington Beach CA Coastal Commission 1400 10t"St 200 Main Street 45 Fremont St #2000 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 San Francisco, CA 94105-2219 Linda Adams,Secretary for EPA Lester Snow, Secretary for Natural Joe Geever CA Environmental Protection Agency Resources Surfrider Foundation 1001 1 Street 1416 Ninth St #1311 P 0 Box 6010 Sacramento,CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 San Clemente,CA 92674 Cy Oggins, Div Environment Planning Christopher Herre, Branch Chief Greg Holmes,Unit Chief CA State Lands Commission Dept of Transportation District 12 Department of Toxic Substances 100 Howe Ave #100-South 3337 Michelson Dr #380 5796 Corporate Ave Sacramento,CA 95825-8202 Irvine,CA 92612-8894 Cypress,CA 90630 Ian MacMillan, Program Supervisor Kimberly Brandt,Development Srvc Mark Lewis, Director of Public Works South Coast Air Quality Mgmt District City of Costa Mesa City of Fountain Valley 21865 Copley Dr 77 Fair Dr 10200 Slater Ave Diamond Bar,CA 91765-4182 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200 Fountain Valley,CA 927284736 Marwan Youssef,Public Works Director Delaine Shane,Mgr Environmental Shawn Dewant, Board President City of Westminster Planning Mesa Consolidated Water District 8200 Westminster Blvd Metropolitan Water District of Southem CA 1965 Placentia Ave Westminster, CA 92683 P 0 Box 54153 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Los Angeles, CA 90054-0153 Michael Markus, General Manager Jenelle Froisland, Local Public Affairs Mgr Paul Shoenberger Orange County Water District SCE CalDesal P 0 Box 8300 7333 Bolsa Ave 1965 Placentia Ave Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8300 Westminster,CA 92683 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Mary Jo Baretich, President Mario Adelson,Chief Regional Planner Robert Schaaf,Chairman Cabrillo Wetlands Conservancy CA Regional Water Quality Control Bd City of Huntington Beach 27152 Pacific Coast Hwy#23A 3737 Main St #500 Environmental Board Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Riverside,CA 92501-3348 607 Frankfort Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Toby Moore,Water Resources Manager Colin Kelly,Staff Attorney Golden State Water Company Garry Brown, Executive Director Orange County Coastkeeper 1902 W Corporate Way Elanor Starmor,Western Region Director 3151 Airway Ave #F-110 Anaheim,CA 92801 Food&Water Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Don Schulz,Advisor Merle Moshin David Hamilton Residents for Responsible Desalination 19412 Pompan Dr #107 5401 Kenilworth Dr P 0 Box 5422 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Huntington Beach,CA 92615 Michael Balsamo, Mgr Gen'l Land Use Eileen Murphy Jason Pyle Orange County Public Works 201 21st St 9071 Kapaa Dr P 0 Box 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 ttiquettes faciles 6 peler ® Rephez 8 la hachure afin de www.averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 5160® i Sens de h reveler le rebord Pop up*"d ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' ���� cargement � ) � 1 tasy Peed°'Labels A ® Bend along line to i � �Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge � RV® 5160® i Use Avery®Template 51600 j ®® TM A John Scott Scott Smith Beverly Spaulding 22032 Capistrano Lane 21341 Yarmouth Lane 20322 Eastwood Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Carol&Fred Speaker Howard Wynn 207 6th St 19195 Woodlands Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 , J ANKQ--U-V-51-= JO#NN1= #�aSNUSSI✓1�I pOla 61L q152 (� C- f I 1�� �R 1'0 'v(p �f�OP7G`i'#: Av—, 0 200 NNMr'I N 4`Q4 �,dGu, L/& gLjv Li C� �rI'N1•sP1 0 Cl Zr(PZ le GK�Wi:�+, Gp olOb3o -N 131 6'<MIt2K w#tom-fiPt,L_ 01111, f!7 "J?A qt%-• p%A W l N4tvtQ h'r °IZV'-I t/ pIA N t4 4jV W Gf� �12do�F ly "^NT I t�14 IJ p. � t p r cI zcou q �f�T' Gi Dt7j7}�t f,N ��I�- �'pp-►�� J o5I{� �1v1�IN 1.�,'''J I t3531 �N1"1.l✓J'1 l.{1, �'i PZ ���"117 WP`C �oS#i137pJJ I'Iolt �¢r•;.� 13h ���� jAAR V44V--t l 8, W' 5�6 �t21o'h� 4-114NrlNbMN bel-q& a, 6p g2&gpk N� 1N6 N t3P�lA�, �1L4`�'1 P,I=pj_ HpNL'� i-- r PAN P>^T�r,t� pp�-rlGrp� p5u�rl CO&PT-le—I