Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPub Hear - Appeal PC Approval Conditional Use Permit No 00-4 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Ire 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK April 25, 2001 AES Huntington Beach Attn: Han Tan 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Tan: Please find enclosed the March 5, 2001 minutes of the regular meeting of the City of Huntington Beach City Council at which there was action taken regarding the following: Appeal Filed by Councilmember Ralph Bauer of Planning Commission Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49/Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15/ Negative Declaration No. 00-09 AES Power Generating Facility's Nitrogen Oxide Emissions' Reduction Equipment — n/e of Newland Street- and Pacific Coast Highway (AES Huntington Beach LLC/Mr. Han Tan — Formerly Southern California Edison) Sincerely, Connie Brockway, CIVIC - City Clerk g:/followup/appeal/minute letter 2001.doe (Telephone:714-536-5227) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY - CITY CLERK March 13, 2001 AES Huntington Beach Attn: Han Tan 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Tan: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, March 5, 2001 took action on the following Public Hearing Appeal: To Consider Appeal Filed by Councilmember Ralph Bauer of Planning Commission Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49/Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15/Negative Declaration No. 00-09 — AES Power Generating Facility's Nitrogen Oxide Emissions' Reduction Equipment — n/e of Newland Street and Pacific Coast Highway (AES Huntington Beach LLC/Mr. Han Tan — Formerly Southern California Edison) The City Council upheld the Planning Commission decision of approval. As part of their approval Council amended the conditions to (1) add review by City Council Landscape Review Subcommittee in addition to Design Review Board and Planning Department and (2) if landscaping fails to satisfy City's desired screening results; then physical architectural improvements shall be explored to satisfy the screening requirements. The Action Agenda and amended Findings and Conditions of Approval are enclosed. The March 5, 2001 minutes of the approval of the appeal will be mailed to you following Council approval of the minutes. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from March 13, 2001 to apply to the court for judicial review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office at(714) 536-5227. Since ly, Connie Brockway, CIVIC City Clerk Enclosure: Government Code 1094.6 Amended Suggested Findings and Conditions for Approval Action Agenda Pages 7-8 cc: City Administrator City Attorney Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Jane James,Associate Planner g:/fol lowup/appeal/90dayltr.doc (Telephone:714-536-5227 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE § 1094.6 § 1094.6. Judicial review; decisions of local agencies; petition; filing; time; record; decision and Party defined; ordinance or resolution (a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agency,other than school district,as the term local agency is defined in Section 54951 of to Gover-,ument Code,or of any commission,board,officer or agent thereof, may be had pursuant to Section 1094.5 of this code only if the petition for writ of mandate pursuant to such section is filed within the time li ,s specified in this section. (b) Any such petition shall be filed not later than the 90th day foIowing the date on which the decision becomes final. If there is no provision for reconsideration of the decision, or for a written decision or written findings supporting the decision,in any applicable provision of any statute, charter,'or rule, for the purposes of this section, the decision is final on the date it is announced. If the decision is not announced at the close of the hearing,the date,time,and place of the announcement of the decision shall be announced at the hearing. If there is a provision for reconsideration,the decision is final for purposes of this section upon the expiration of the period during which'such reconsideration can be sought; provided, that if reconsideration is sought pursuant to any such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this section on the date that reconsideration is rejected. If there is a provision for a written decision or written findings,the decision is final for purposes of this section upon the date it is mailed by first-class mail, postage prepaid, including a copy of the affidavit,or*certificate of mailing, to the party seeking the writ. Subdivision (a) of Section 1013 does not apply to extend the time,following deposit in- the mail of the decision or findings,within which a petition shall be filed. (c) The complete record of the proceedings'shall be prepared by'the local agency or its commission,. board, officer, or agent which made the decision and shall be delivered to the petitioner within 190 days after he has filed a written request therefor. The local agency may recover from the petitioner its actual costs for transcribing or otherwise preparing the record. Such record shall include the transcript of the proceedings, all pleadings, all notices a7:d orders, any proposed decision by a hearing officer, the final decision,all admitted exhibits,'ate rejeelted exhibits in the possession of the local agency or its commission., board,officer,or agent,all written evidence,and any other papers in the case. (d) If the petitioner files a request for the record as specified in subdivision(c)within 10 days after the date the decision becomes final as provided in subdivision(b),the time within which a petition pursuant to Section 1094.5 may be filed shall be extended to not later than the 30th day following the date on which the record-is either personally delivered or mailed to the petitioner or his attorney of record, if he has one: (e) As used in this section, decision means a decision subject to review pursuant to Section 1094.5, suspending,demoting,or dismissing a_-,officer or employee,revoking, denying an application for a permit, license, or other entitlement, i:.: ,o-sing a civil or administrative penalty, fine, charge, or cost, or denying an application for any retirement benefit or allowance. (f) In making a final decision as de=7 .ed in subdivision (e), the local agency shall provide notice to the party that the time within which judiciz review must be sought is governed by this section. As used in this subdivision,"party"rnzE is an officer or employee who has been suspended,demoted or dismissed; a person whose permit,license,or other entitlement has been revoked or suspended,or whose application.for a permit,license, or othez-entitlement has been denied; or a person whose application for a retirement benefit or allowance has b en denied. (g) This section shall prevail over any conflicting provision in any otherwise applicable law relating to the subject matter, unless the conflictuLr:g provision is a state or federal law which provides a.shorter statute of limitations,in which case the shorter statute of limitations shall apply. (Amended by Stats. 1983, a 818, § 3; Stats.1991, c. 1090 (A.B.1484), § 6; Stats.1993, a 926 (A.B.2205), § 5; Stats.1995,c.898(S.B.814), § 1.) ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/ COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMINT NO. 00-15 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09: 1. The Negative Declaration No. 00-09 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty (30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15. 2. The proposed project, method of ammonia generation, and standard conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Planning Commission that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 will have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system at AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The SCR system is proposed in order to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from the power plant as mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The ammonia necessary for reduction of nitrogen oxide emissions will be generated via a Urea to Ammonia process, which allows ammonia to be generated on an as needed basis. Therefore,the proposed project does not include any transport or storage of ammonia. Based upon the conditions imposed and the proposed project itself, the community will benefit from reduced nitrogen oxide emissions. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because nitrogen oxide emissions from the power generating facility will be reduced, dead and dying landscaping will be replaced, irrigation systems will be made 100% operational, and landscaping along the south and east perimeter will be intensified. This project is also compatible with surrounding uses because installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility. The equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. P.L01-12attfinal 1 03/07/01 4:42 PM 3. The proposed Selective Catalytic Reduction at AES Huntington Beach will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed project complies with all development standards of the General Industrial zoning district. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Public on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: A. Land Use Element Policy LU2.1.1: Plan and construct public infrastructure and service improvements as demand necessitates to support the land uses specified in the Land Use Plan(as defined in the Circulation and Public Utilities and Services Elements of the General Plan). Utilities Element Goal U5: Maintain and expand service provision(of gas supply, telecommunication, and electricity)to City of Huntington Beach residents and business. Policy U 5.1.1: Continue to work with service providers to maintain current levels of service and facilitate improved levels of service. Policy U5.1.4: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The existing AES power generating facility is necessary to provide power to Huntington Beach residents and business owners in addition to the power services provided for the entire Southern California power grid. The new SCR system will benefit residents, property owners, and the Huntington Beach community by reducing nitrogen oxide emissions from the plant as mandated by the SCAQMD. Installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility because the equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. C. Urban Design Element a . Policy UP 2.2.1: Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. Policies- UD 1.4.1: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. PLO 1-12attfinal 2 03/07/01 4:42 PM The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. D. Draft Coastal Element Draft Policy 9a: Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas that does not significantly degrade habitat values and which is compatible with the continuance of the habitat. Recognizing the greater than local significance of the City's energy resources, Coastal Element policy allows for the continuation, and in some cases expansion, of these facilities while ensuring the community's public health and safety, environmental protection and minimization of negative aesthetic impacts to the maximum extent feasible. The suggested conditions of approval include requirements for AES to improve the quality of existing landscaping around the southern and eastern property lines while also making the irrigation system 100% operational. The conditions also include language requiring AES to enter into an agreement with the City with a fair share proportionate bond to cover the cost of landscaping and street improvements for Newland Street. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 for the development project, as proposed or as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The project includes conditions to replace dead and dying landscaping, to make irrigation systems 100% operational, and to intensify landscaping along the south and east perimeter of the power plant. The project complies with the Draft Coastal Element, currently under review by the Planning Commission, which states that landscaping should be utilized to buffer the appearance of existing utility operations. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The SCR system complies with all aspects of the Coastal Zone overlay and the General Industrial zoning district. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. All infrastructure necessary for the SCR system is either currently available to AES, the property owner and applicant, or AES will be installing the necessary improvements for the SCR equipment. 4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The existing AES power generating facility nor the proposed SCR system do not conflict with either public access or public recreation to coastal amenities. PL01-12attfinal 3 03/07/01 4:42 PM CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 29, 2000 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to clearing and grubbing, the following shall be completed: a. Existing mature trees that are to be removed must be replaced at a 2-for-1 ratio with a 36- inch box tree or palm equivalent. Applicant shall provide a consulting arborist report on all the existing trees. Said report shall quantify, identify, size, and analyze the health of the existing trees. The report shall also recommend how the existing trees that are to remain (if any) shall be protected and how far construction/grading shall be kept from the trunk. b. Any work within the public right-of-way will require encroachment permits and traffic control plans prepared to City standards. 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the index. b. A City Council Subcommittee, the Design Review Board, and the Planning Department shall review and approve plans for intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements around the south, west, and east property lines as required in Condition of Approval No. 7. f. If landscaping alone fails to satisfy,the City's desired screening results, then physical architectural improvements shall be explored to satisfy this requirement. The intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements are intended to upgrade the visual quality and aesthetic view of the power generating station from public right-of- ways. c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit 8 inch by 10 inch colored photographs of all colored renderings and elevations to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file. b. The following information and/or plans demonstrating compliance with the following issue areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: 1) Hazards and Operability Study (HAZOPS) for the entire urea to ammonia process and appropriate mitigation measures. (FD) 2) The Urea to Ammonia system shall be designed so that no detectable ammonia odor travels off-site. This requirement can be accomplished by systems such as water spray or fixed monitors to absorb any release or any other cooling method acceptable to the Fire Chief (FD) 3) Provide Seismic Zone 4 construction. (FD) PL01-12attfinal 4 03/07/01 4:42 PM 4) Provide spill control and secondary containment to include equipment, tanks, piping, truck unloading and fixed fire protection system. Secondary containment shall have impermeable surfaces and will be designed to prevent any intrusion into areas where fish, etc. would be destroyed by ammonia solution. (FD) 5) Provide static electricity control. (FD) 9) Provide plans for redundant alarms, notification devices, and manual override systems. (FD) 10)Provide classified electrical, Class I, Division 2 unless proven unnecessary by a licensed electrical engineer's review of a certified process engineer's statement that no flammable atmosphere could be present. (FD) 11)Provide certification from a registered fire protection engineer stating no possibility of explosive dust production from the urea unloading process. (FD) 12)Provide proof that all tanks, valves, fittings, pipe, etc. are appropriate for the specified products as determined by an appropriate licensed mechanical engineer. Certification to include a list of all codes and sections for appropriate documentation. (FD) c. AES will certify via written statement submitted to the Fire Chief that AES will immediately report any spill or leak to the Fire Department. (FD) 5. Within four weeks of building permit issuance, the following issue areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief - a. AES must demonstrate on-site containment and an approved spill mitigation and disposal plan and shall also submit a Spill Release Policy subject to approval by the Fire Chief. (FD) b. Publish and submit an approved Emergency Response Plan and employee training program. (FD) 6. During site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%) by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. P1.01-12attfinal 5 03/07/01 4:42 PM f. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. 7. Prior to final building permit inspection, the following shall be completed: a. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including: 1) Landscaping; 2) Fire extinguishers shall be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards found in City Specification#424. (FD) 3) Automatic fire sprinkler and fire alarm system may be required. Fire will need to meet with AES personnel to discuss entire system prior to final permit inspection. (FD) 4) Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification#401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. (FD) 5) If applicable, installation and/or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and HBFD requirements. Certain areas may require conformance to City Specification 9431, Gas Fired Appliances. (FD) 6) If applicable, this project shall comply with the Cal-ARP program for Hazardous Materials reporting. (FD) 7) Provide installation of protective crash posts. (FD) 8) All hot equipment, pipes, etc. to be insulated. (FD) 9) Meet all general requirements of Huntington Beach Fire Code Section 8001 regarding notification and signage. (FD) b. The applicant shall be responsible for construction the half-width street improvements along the Newland Street frontage of the project site as set forth in the City's letter dated September 23, 1997, from Melanie Fallon to Peter Lersey of SCE. As an alternative, the applicant may enter into an appropriate agreement, with accompanying security, which provides for a cash deposit to be made to the City to pay for the cost of designing and constructing the Newland Street frontage improvements. The City will handle the design and construction of a larger Newland Street widening project extending from Pacific Coast Highway northerly to Hamilton Avenue using the proportionate contribution from this project as well as from other projects having similar frontage improvement obligations. (PW) c. Water Ordinance No. 14.52, the`'Water Efficient Landscape.Requirements" apply for projects with 2,500 square feet of landscaping and lager. (PW) PLO1-12attfinal 6 03/07/01 4:42 PM d. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. (PW) e. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection . (PW) f. Intensified landscape planting and/or physical architectural improvements to upgrade the visual quality and aesthetic view of the power generating facility from public right-of-ways shall be required. Intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements shall be on the south, west, and the easterly (south-east)boundaries. Owner shall make functional and obtain 100% coverage with the existing irrigation system. New systems may need to be added and dead or dying plant material shall be replaced. Plans shall include sections demonstrating how the ultimate growth of the plant material or architectural changes will help screen the existing plant. The landscaping and irrigation improvements shall be subject to review and approval of a landscape construction set by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works and Planning Departments. (PW) g. The existing berm, fences, and landscaping within the Newland Street frontage shall removed and new intensified screening shall be reconstructed behind the right-of-way. The new screening shall be subject to City Council Subcommittee, Design Review Board, Planning Director, and Public Works Director approvals. The landscaping shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. (PW) h. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials, an irrigation plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines. (PW) (Code Requirement) i. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. j. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. k. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 8. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. PL01-12attfinal 7 03/07/01 4:42 PM INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall not become effective until the ten working day appeal period has elapsed. For projects in the appealable area of the coastal zone, there is an additional ten working day appeal period that commences when the California Coastal Commission receives the City's notification of final action. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is March 5, 2001, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 7. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$43.00 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. 8. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission. 9. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 10. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. (PW) 11. A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Department prior to occupying the building. PLOT-12attfinal 8 03/07/01 4:42 PM (7) March 5, 2001 Council/Agency Agenda - Page 7 D. PUBLIC HEARINGS Anyone wishing to speak on an OPEN public hearing is requested to complete the attached pink form and give it to the Sergeant-at-Arms located near the Speaker's Podium. D-1. (City Council) Public Hearing Continued Open From February 20, 2001 to Consider Appeal Filed by Councilmember Ralph Bauer of Planning Commission Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49/Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15/Negative Declaration No. 00-09—AES Power Generating Facility's Nitrogen Oxide Emissions' Reduction Equipment— We of Newland Street and Pacific Coast Highway (AES Huntington Beach LLC/Mr. Han Tan— Formerly Southern California Edison) (420.40) Appellant: Ralph Bauer, Huntington Beach City Councilmember Applicant: Mr. Han Tan, AES Huntington Beach, LLC, 21730 Newland Street, Huntington Beach Request: Appeal of the Planning Commission's approval to install nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment in two boilers at the Huntington Beach Power Generating Station. Location: 21730 Newland Street (northeast of Newland Street and Pacific Coast Highway) Coastal Zone Status: Notice is hereby given that this item is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15, filed on July 27, 2000, in conjunction with the above request. The Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action. Following City Council action, it may be appealed to the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. The California Coastal Commission South Coast Area Office address is 200 Oceangate, 101h Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802-4302, phone number: (310)570-5071. Environmental Status: Notice is hereby given that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that this item would not have any significant environmental effects and that a negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the appeal, the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. On File: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report is available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office. (Continued on the Next Page) (8) March 5, 2001 Council/Agency Agenda - Page 8 All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 714-536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. 1. Staff report 2. City Council discussion 3. Open public hearing 4. Follow public input, close public hearing Planning Commission and Staff Recommended Action: Motion to: 1. Approve Negative Declaration No. 00-09 with findings (ATTACHMENT NO. 1); and 2. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 with findings and modified conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO. 1). [Planning Director Howard Zelefsky and Associate Planner Jane James presented slide report announced as a Late Communication by the City Clerk.] [Approved as amended to (1) amend Condition No. 3B to add review by City Council Landscape Review Subcommittee in addition to Design Review Board and Planning Department and (2) if landscaping fails to satisfy City's desired screening results; then physical architectural improvements shall be explored to satisfy the screening requirements - (7-0)] He CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK March 13, 2001 ' California Coastal Commission South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, 101h Floor Long Beach, CA 90801-4302 NOTICE OF ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15 Appellant: Ralph Bauer, Huntington Beach City Councilmember Applicant: Mr. Han Tan, AES Huntington Beach, LLC, 21730 Newland Street, Huntington Beach Request: Appeal of the Planning Commission's approval to install nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment in two boilers at the Huntington Beach Power Generating Station. Location: 21730 Newland Street (northeast of Newland Street and Pacific Coast Highway) Coastal Zone Status: Notice is hereby given that this item is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15, filed on July 27, 2000, in conjunction with the above request. The Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action. Following City Council action, it may be appealed to the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. The California Coastal Commission South Coast Area Office address is 200 Oceangate, 101h Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802-4302, phone number: (310) 570-5071. Environmental Status: Notice is hereby given that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that this item would not have any significant environmental effects and that a negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the appeal, the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street,;and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. g:/followup/appeal/coastal comm/cdp 00-15.doc 1 - (Telephone:714-536-5227) On March 5, 2001, the Huntington Beach City Council approved the Negative Declaration No. 00-09 with findings, Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 with findings and modified conditions of approval as amended to (1) amend condition 3b to add review by City Council Landscape Review Subcommittee in addition to Design Review Board and Planning Department and (2) if landscaping fails to satisfy City's desired screening results; then physical architectural improvements shall be explored to satisfy the screening requirements. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Green, Boardman, Cook, Julien Houchen, Garofalo, Dettloff, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None Sincerely, L� Connie Brockway, CIVIC City Clerk CB: jh Enclosure: Amended Suggested Findings & Conditions of Approval cc: Ralph Bauer, City Councilmember, Huntington Beach Ray Silver, City Administrator Gail Hutton, City Attorney Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Jane James, Associate Planner g1followup/appeal/coastal comm/cdp 00-15.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/ COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMINT NO. 00-15 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09: 1. The Negative Declaration No. 00-09 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for _ a public comment period of thirty(30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15. 2. The proposed project, method of ammonia generation, and standard conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Planning Commission that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 will have.a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of the Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR) system at AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The SCR system is proposed in order to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from the power plant as mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The ammonia necessary for reduction of nitrogen oxide emissions will be generated via a Urea to Ammonia process, which allows ammonia to be generated on an as needed basis. Therefore, the proposed project does not include any transport or storage of ammonia. Based upon the conditions imposed and the proposed project itself, the community will benefit from reduced nitrogen oxide emissions. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because nitrogen oxide emissions from the power generating facility will be reduced, dead and dying landscaping will be replaced, irrigation systems will be made 100% operational, and landscaping along the south and east perimeter will be intensified. This project is also compatible with surrounding uses because installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility. The equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. 'PLO1-12attfinal 1 03/07/01 4:42 PM 3. The proposed Selective Catalytic Reduction at AES Huntington Beach will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed project complies with all development standards of the General Industrial zoning district. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Public on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: A Land Use Element Policy LU 2.1.1: Plan and construct public infrastructure and service improvements as demand necessitates to support the land uses specified in the Land Use Plan(as defined in the Circulation and Public Utilities and Services Elements of the General Plan). Utilities Element Goal U5: Maintain and expand service provision(of gas supply, telecommunication, and electricity)to City of Huntington Beach residents and business. Policy U 5.1.1: Continue to work with service providers to maintain current levels of service and facilitate improved levels of service. Policy U5.1.4: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such.facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The existing AES power generating facility is necessary to provide power to Huntington Beach residents and business owners in addition to the power services provided for the entire Southern California power grid. The new SCR system will benefit residents, property owners, and the Huntington Beach community by reducing nitrogen oxide emissions from the plant as mandated by the SCAQMD. Installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the " existing facility because the equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. C. Urban Design Element " Policy UD 2.2.1: Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. Policies- UD 1.4.1: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. PLO1-12attfinal 2 03/07/01 4:42 PM The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. D. Draft Coastal Element Draft Policy 9a: Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas that does not significantly degrade habitat values and which is compatible with the continuance of the habitat. Recognizing the greater than local significance of the City's energy resources, Coastal Element policy allows for the continuation, and in some cases expansion, of these facilities while ensuring the community's public health and safety, environmental protection and minimization of negative aesthetic impacts to the maximum extent feasible. The suggested conditions of approval include requirements for AES to improve the quality of existing landscaping around the southern and eastern property lines while also making the irrigation system 100% operational. The conditions also include language requiring AES to enter into an agreement with the City with a fair share proportionate bond to cover the cost of landscaping and street improvements for Newland Street. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 for the development project, as proposed or as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The project includes conditions to replace dead and dying landscaping, to make irrigation systems 100% operational, and to intensify landscaping along the south and east perimeter of the power plant. The project complies with the Draft Coastal Element, currently under review by the Planning Commission, which states that landscaping should be utilized to buffer the appearance of existing utility operations. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The SCR system complies with all aspects of the Coastal Zone overlay and the General Industrial zoning district. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. All infrastructure necessary for the SCR system is either currently available to AES, the property owner and applicant, or AES will be installing the necessary improvements for the SCR equipment. 4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The existing AES power generating facility nor the proposed SCR system do not conflict with either public access or public recreation to coastal amenities. PL01-12attfinal 3 03/07/01 4:42 PM CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and'dated September 29, 2000 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to clearing and grubbing, the following shall be completed: a. Existing mature trees that are to be removed must be replaced at a 2-for-1 ratio with a 36- inch box tree or palm equivalent. Applicant shall provide a consulting arborist report on all the existing trees. Said report shall quantify, identify, size, and analyze the health of the existing trees. The report shall also recommend how the existing trees that are to remain (if any) shall be protected and how far construction/grading shall be kept from the trunk. b. Any work within the public right-of-way will require encroachment permits and.traffic control plans prepared to City standards. 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the index. b. A City Council Subcommittee, the Design Review Board, and the Planning Department shall review and approve plans for intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements around the south, west, and east property lines as required in Condition of Approval No. 7. f. If landscaping alone fails to satisfy the City's desired screening results, then physical architectural improvements shall be explored to satisfy this requirement. The intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements are intended to upgrade the visual quality and aesthetic view of the power generating station from public right-of- ways. c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit 8 inch by 10 inch colored photographs of all colored renderings and elevations to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file. b. The following information and/or plans demonstrating compliance with the following issue areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: 1) Hazards and Operability Study (HAZOPS) for the entire urea to ammonia process and appropriate mitigation measures. (FD) 2) The Urea to Ammonia system shall be designed so that no detectable ammonia odor travels off-site. This requirement can be accomplished by systems such as water spray or fixed monitors to absorb any release or any other cooling method acceptable to the Fire Chief. (FD) 3) Provide Seismic Zone 4 construction. (FD) PL01-12attfinal 4 03/07/01 4:42 PM 4) Provide spill control and secondary containment to include equipment, tanks, piping, truck unloading and fixed fire protection system. Secondary containment shall have impermeable surfaces and will be designed to prevent any intrusion into areas where fish, etc. would be destroyed by ammonia solution. (FD) 5) Provide static electricity control. (FD) 9) Provide plans for redundant alarms, notification devices, and manual override systems. (FD) 10)Provide classified electrical, Class I, Division 2 unless proven unnecessary by a licensed electrical engineer's review of a certified process engineer's statement that no flammable atmosphere could be present. (FD) 11)Provide certification from a registered fire protection engineer stating no possibility of explosive dust production from the urea unloading process. (FD) 12)Provide proof that all tanks, valves, fittings, pipe, etc. are appropriate for the specified products as determined by an appropriate licensed mechanical engineer. Certification to include a list of all codes and sections for appropriate documentation. (FD) c. AES will certify via written statement submitted to the Fire Chief that AES will immediately report any spill or leak to the Fire Department. (FD) 5. Within four weeks of building permit issuance, the following issue areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: a. AES must demonstrate on-site containment and an approved spill mitigation and disposal plan and shall also submit a Spill Release Policy subject to approval by the Fire Chief. (FD) b. Publish and submit an approved Emergency Response Plan and employee training program. (FD) 6. During site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%) by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. ' -PLO1-12attfinal 5 03/07/01 4:42 PM f. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. 7. Prior to final building permit inspection, the following shall be completed: a. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including: 1) Landscaping; 2) Fire extinguishers shall be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards found in City Specification#424. (FD) 3) Automatic fire sprinkler and fire alarm system may be required. Fire will need to meet with AES personnel to discuss entire system prior to final permit inspection. (FD) 4) Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification#401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. (FD) 5) If applicable, installation and/or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and HBFD requirements. Certain areas may require conformance to City Specification #431, Gas Fired Appliances. (FD) 6) If applicable, this project shall comply with the Cal-ARP program for Hazardous Materials reporting. (FD) 7) Provide installation of protective crash posts. (FD) 8) All hot equipment, pipes, etc. to be insulated. (FD) 9) Meet all general requirements of Huntington Beach Fire Code Section 8001 regarding notification and signage. (FD) b. The applicant shall be responsible for construction the half-width street improvements along the Newland Street frontage of the project site as set forth in the City's letter dated September 23, 1997, from Melanie Fallon to Peter Lersey of SCE. As an alternative, the applicant may enter into an appropriate agreement, with accompanying security, which provides for a cash deposit to be made to the City to pay for the cost of designing and constructing the Newland Street frontage improvements. The City will handle the design and construction of a larger Newland Street widening project extending from Pacific Coast Highway northerly to Hamilton Avenue using the proportionate contribution from this project as well as from other projects having similar frontage improvement obligations. (PW) i c. Water Ordinance No. 14.52, the"Water Efficient Landscape Requirements" apply for projects with 2,500 square feet of landscaping and lager. (PW) PL01-12attfinal 6 03/07/01 4:42 PM d. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. (PW) e. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection . (PW) f. Intensified landscape planting and/or physical architectural improvements to upgrade the visual quality and aesthetic view of the power generating facility from public right-of-ways shall be required. Intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements shall be on the south, west, and the easterly(south-east)boundaries. Owner shall make functional and obtain 100% coverage with the existing irrigation system. New systems may need to be added and dead or dying plant material shall be replaced. Plans shall include sections demonstrating how the ultimate growth of the plant material or architectural changes will help screen the existing plant. The landscaping and irrigation improvements shall be subject to review and approval of a landscape construction set by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works and Planning Departments. (PW) g. The existing berm, fences, and landscaping within the Newland Street frontage shall removed and new intensified screening shall be reconstructed behind the right-of-way. The new screening shall be subject to City Council Subcommittee, Design Review Board, Planning Director, and Public Works Director approvals. The landscaping shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. (PW) h. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials, an irrigation plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines. (PW) (Code Requirement) i. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. j. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. k. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe,and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 8. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. PLO 1-12attfinal 7 03/07/01 4:42 PM INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall not become effective until the ten working day appeal period has elapsed. For projects in the appealable area of the coastal zone, there is an additional ten working day appeal period that commences when the California Coastal Commission receives the City's notification of final action. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is March 5, 2001, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 7. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$43.00 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. 8. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission. 9. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 10. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. (PW) 11. A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Department prior to occupying the building. f PLO 1-12attfinal 8 03/07/01 4:42 PM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MEETING DATE: March 5, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-12 Council/Agency Meeting Held: 83— o 5—O1 Deferred/Continued to: �A proved ❑ Conditionally Approv d ❑ Denied Ity Cle Signature 7—`3 a� Tt3c1��DTioNI�R Council Meeting Date: March 5, 2001 Department ID Number: PL01-12 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, City Administrator oM-Y PREPARED BY: HOWARD ZELEFSKY, Director of Planning I MICHAEL P. DOLDER, Fire Chief/Information Systems Directo SUBJECT: APPROVE AES POWER GENERATING STATION'S NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS REDUCTION EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 20, 2001 WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN) iFstat,m,ntofissue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Council Member Ralph Bauer, of the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49, Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15, and Negative Declaration No. 00-09. This application represents a request by AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station to install nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment in the boilers at Units 1 and 2. The equipment is called Selective Catalytic Reduction system or SCR. The project was continued from the February 20, 2001 City Council meeting at the applicant's request. AES requested a continuance (Attachment No. 3) because they had questions and concerns about some of the recommended conditions of approval: Staff has since met with AES and mutually agreed on revised language for several Fire related recommended conditions. Staff also recommends clarifications in the conditions regarding landscaping and screening requirements. Attachment No. 1 depicts the revised language as recommended for Council adoption by staff and Attachment No. 2 is a Legislative Draft of the conditions with bold and strike-through font to depict amendments since the February 20, 2001 Request for Council Action. D -1 PL01-12 -2- 02/27/01 1:29 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: March 5, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-12 The Planning Commission approved the project and is recommending approval because the SCR is necessary to reduce pollution emissions at the power plant in accordance with regulations and standards set by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Staff recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission and is recommending the City Council approve the request with modifications to the conditions of approval (Recommended Action) because the Fire Department suggests additional measures to assure protection of the Huntington Beach community from all risks associated with the use of ammonia. Council Member Bauer appealed the project because he has concerns regarding community safety and the use of ammonia, a hazardous material generated within the emission reduction equipment. The applicant is requesting approval because AES is mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District to reduce current nitrogen oxide emissions by 90%. All background data, discussion, and an analysis of the project are contained within the Request For Council action forwarded to the City Council and the public on February 20, 2001 (Attachment No. 4). Funding Source: Not applicable. Recommended Action: PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: 1. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 00-09 with findings (ATTACHMENT NO. 1)", and 2. "Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 with findings and modified conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO. 1)." Attachment(s): NumberCity Clerk's Page Description 1. Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval 2. Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval Legislative Draft 3. Letter from Ed Blackford, AES President, dated February 20, 2001 requesting continuance L4. Request for Council Action dated February 20, 2001 Auth rr e ' Fa u,,, Ml PL01-12 -3- 02/27/01 1:29 PM 1<- tp (7) March 5, 2001 Council/Agency Agenda - Page 7 IN F�LF D. PUBLIC HEARINGS Anyone wishing to speak on an OPEN public hearing is requested to complete the attached pink form and give it to the Sergeant-at-Arms located near the Speaker's Podium. D-1. (City Council) Public Hearing Continued Open From February 20, 2001 to Consider Appeal Filed by Councilmember Ralph Bauer of Plannina Commission Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49/Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15/Negative Declaration No. 00-09—AES Power Generatina Facility's Nitrogen Oxide Emissions' Reduction Equipment— We of Newland Street and Pacific Coast Highway (AES Huntington Beach LLC/Mr. Han Tan— Formerly Southern California Edison (420.40) Appellant: Ralph Bauer, Huntington Beach City Councilmember Applicant: Mr. Han Tan, AES Huntington Beach, LLC, 21730 Newland Street, Huntington Beach Request: Appeal of the Planning Commission's approval to install nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment in two boilers at the Huntington Beach Power Generating Station. Location: 21730 Newland Street (northeast of Newland Street and Pacific Coast Highway) Coastal Zone Status: Notice is hereby given that this item is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15, filed on July 27, 2000, in conjunction with the above request. The Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action. Following City Council action, it may be appealed to the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. The California Coastal Commission South Coast Area Office address is 200 Oceangate, 101h Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802-4302, phone number: (310) 570-5071. Environmental Status: Notice is hereby given that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that this item would not have any significant environmental effects and that a negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the appeal, the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. On File: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report is available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office. (Continued on the Next Page) Ke (8) March 5, 2001 Council/Agency Agenda - Page 8 All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 714-536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. 1. Staff report 2. City Council discussion 3. Open public hearing 4. Follow public input, close public hearing Planning Commission and Staff Recommended Action: Motion to: 1. Approve Negative Declaration No. 00-09 with findings (ATTACHMENT NO. 1); and 2. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 with findings and modified conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO. 1). [Planning Director Howard Zelefsky and Associate Planner Jane James presented slide report announced as a Late Communication by the City Clerk.] [Approved as amended to (1) amend Condition No. 3B to add review by City Council Landscape Review Subcommittee in addition to Design Review Board and Planning Department and (2) if landscaping fails to satisfy City's desired screening results; then physical architectural improvements shall be explored to satisfy the screening requirements — (7-0)] r // � � � r/9//rr% rr � r \ �u r \� ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/ COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMINT NO. 00-15 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09: 1. The Negative Declaration No. 00-09 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty (30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15. 2. The proposed project, method of ammonia generation, and standard conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Planning Commission that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 will have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of the Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR) system at AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The SCR system is proposed in order to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from the power plant as mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The ammonia necessary for reduction of nitrogen oxide emissions will be generated via a Urea to Ammonia process, which allows ammonia to be generated on an as needed basis. Therefore, the proposed project does not include any transport or storage of ammonia. Based upon the conditions imposed and the proposed project itself, the community will benefit from reduced nitrogen oxide emissions. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because nitrogen oxide emissions from the power generating facility will be reduced, dead and dying landscaping will be replaced, irrigation systems will be made 100% operational, and landscaping along the south and east perimeter will be intensified. This project is also compatible with surrounding uses because installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility. The equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. PLO1-12attfinal 1 03/07/01 4:42 PM 3. The proposed Selective Catalytic Reduction at AES Huntington Beach will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed project complies with all development standards of the General Industrial zoning district. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Public on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: A. Land Use Element Policy L U 2.1.1: Plan and construct public infrastructure and service improvements as demand necessitates to support the land uses specified in the Land Use Plan (as defined in the Circulation and Public Utilities and Services Elements of the General Plan). Utilities Element Goal U 5: Maintain and expand service provision(of gas supply, telecommunication, and electricity)to City of Huntington Beach residents and business. Policy U 5.1.1: Continue to work with service providers to maintain current levels of service and facilitate improved levels of service. Policy U 5.1.4: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The existing AES power generating facility is necessary to provide power to Huntington Beach residents and business owners in addition to the power services provided for the entire Southern California power grid. The new SCR system will benefit residents, property owners, and the Huntington Beach community by reducing nitrogen oxide emissions from the plant as mandated by the SCAQMD. Installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility because the equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. C. Urban Design Element Policy UD 2.2.1: Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. Policies- UD 1.4.1: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. PLO1-12attfiml 2 03/07/01 4:42 PM The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. D. Draft Coastal Element Draft Policy qa: Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas that does not significantly degrade habitat values and which is compatible with the continuance of the habitat. Recognizing the greater than local significance of the City's energy resources, Coastal Element policy allows for the continuation, and in some cases expansion, of these facilities while ensuring the community's public health and safety, environmental protection and minimization of negative aesthetic impacts to the maximum extent feasible. The suggested conditions of approval include requirements for AES to improve the quality of existing landscaping around the southern and eastern property lines while also making the irrigation system 100% operational. The conditions also include language requiring AES to enter into an agreement with the City with a fair share proportionate bond to cover the cost of landscaping and street improvements for Newland Street. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 for the development project, as proposed or as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The project includes conditions to replace dead and dying landscaping, to make irrigation systems 100% operational, and to intensify landscaping along the south and east perimeter of the power plant. The project complies with the Draft Coastal Element, currently under review by the Planning Commission, which states that landscaping should be utilized to buffer the appearance of existing utility operations. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The SCR system complies with all aspects of the Coastal Zone overlay and the General Industrial zoning district. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. All infrastructure necessary for the SCR system is either currently available to AES,the property owner and applicant, or AES will be installing the necessary improvements for the SCR equipment. 4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The existing AES power generating facility nor the proposed SCR system do not conflict with either public access or public recreation to coastal amenities. PLO 1-12attfinal 3 03/07/01 4:42 PM CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 29, 2000 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to clearing and grubbing, the following shall be completed: a. Existing mature trees that are to be removed must be replaced at a 2-for-1 ratio with a 36- inch box tree or palm equivalent. Applicant shall provide a consulting arborist report on all the existing trees. Said report shall quantify, identify, size, and analyze the health of the existing trees. The report shall also recommend how the existing trees that are to remain (if any) shall be protected and how far construction/grading shall be kept from the trunk. b. Any work within the public right-of-way will require encroachment permits and traffic control plans prepared to City standards. 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the index. b. A City Council Subcommittee, the Design Review Board, and the Planning Department shall review and approve plans for intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements around the south, west, and east property lines as required in Condition of Approval No. 7. f. If landscaping alone fails to satisfy the City's desired screening results, then physical architectural improvements shall be explored to satisfy this requirement. The intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements are intended to upgrade the visual quality and aesthetic view of the power generating station from public right-of- ways. c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit 8 inch by 10 inch colored photographs of all colored renderings and elevations to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file. b. The following information and/or plans demonstrating compliance with the following issue areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: 1) Hazards and Operability Study(HAZOPS) for the entire urea to ammonia process and appropriate mitigation measures. (FD) 2) The Urea to Ammonia system shall be designed so that no detectable ammonia odor travels off-site. This requirement can be accomplished by systems such as water spray or fixed monitors to absorb any release or any other cooling method acceptable to the Fire Chief. (FD) 3) Provide Seismic Zone 4 construction. (FD) PLO 1-12attfinal 4 03/07/01 4:42 PM 4) Provide spill control and secondary containment to include equipment, tanks, piping, truck unloading and fixed fire protection system. Secondary containment shall have impermeable surfaces and will be designed to prevent any intrusion into areas where fish, etc. would be destroyed by ammonia solution. (FD) 5) Provide static electricity control. (FD) 9) Provide plans for redundant alarms, notification devices, and manual override systems. (FD) 10)Provide classified electrical, Class I, Division 2 unless proven unnecessary by a licensed electrical engineer's review of a certified process engineer's statement that no flammable atmosphere could be present. (FD) 11)Provide certification from a registered fire protection engineer stating no possibility of explosive dust production from the urea unloading process. (FD) 12)Provide proof that all tanks, valves, fittings, pipe, etc. are appropriate for the specified products as determined by an appropriate licensed mechanical engineer. Certification to include a list of all codes and sections for appropriate documentation. (FD) c. AES will certify via written statement submitted to the Fire Chief that AES will immediately report any spill or leak to the Fire Department. (FD) 5. Within four weeks of building permit issuance, the following issue areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: a. AES must demonstrate on-site containment and an approved spill mitigation and disposal plan and shall also submit a Spill Release Policy subject to approval by the Fire Chief. (FD) b. Publish and submit an approved Emergency Response Plan and employee training program. (FD) 6. During site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. PLO 1-12attfinal 5 03/07/01 4:42 PM f. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. 7. Prior to final building permit inspection, the following shall be completed: a. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including: 1) Landscaping; 2) Fire extinguishers shall be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards found in City Specification#424. (FD) 3) Automatic fire sprinkler and fire alarm system may be required. Fire will need to meet with AES personnel to discuss entire system prior to final permit inspection. (FD) 4) Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification 4401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. (FD) 5) If applicable, installation and/or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and HBFD requirements. Certain areas may require conformance to City Specification #431, Gas Fired Appliances. (FD) 6) If applicable, this project shall comply with the Cal-ARP program for Hazardous Materials reporting. (FD) 7) Provide installation of protective crash posts. (FD) 8) All hot equipment, pipes, etc. to be insulated. (FD) 9) Meet all general requirements of Huntington Beach Fire Code Section 8001 regarding notification and signage. (FD) b. The applicant shall be responsible for construction the half-width street improvements along the Newland Street frontage of the project site as set forth in the City's letter dated September 23, 1997, from Melanie Fallon to Peter Lersey of SCE. As an alternative, the applicant may enter into an appropriate agreement, with accompanying security, which provides for a cash deposit to be made to the City to pay for the cost of designing and constructing the Newland Street frontage improvements. The City will handle the design and construction of a larger Newland Street widening project extending from Pacific Coast Highway northerly to Hamilton Avenue using the proportionate contribution from this project as well as from other projects having similar frontage improvement obligations. (PW) c. Water Ordinance No. 14.52, the"Water Efficient Landscape Requirements" apply for projects with 2,500 square feet of landscaping and lager. (PW) PLO 1-12attfinal 6 03/07/01 4:42 PM d. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. (PW) e. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection . (PW) f. Intensified landscape planting and/or physical architectural improvements to upgrade the visual quality and aesthetic view of the power generating facility from public right-of-ways shall be required. Intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements shall be on the south, west, and the easterly (south-east)boundaries. Owner shall make functional and obtain 100% coverage with the existing irrigation system. New systems may need to be added and dead or dying plant material shall be replaced. Plans shall include sections demonstrating how the ultimate growth of the plant material or architectural changes will help screen the existing plant. The landscaping and irrigation improvements shall be subject to review and approval of a landscape construction set by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works and Planning Departments. (PW) g. The existing berm, fences, and landscaping within the Newland Street frontage shall removed and new intensified screening shall be reconstructed behind the right-of-way. The new screening shall be subject to City Council Subcommittee, Design Review Board, Planning Director, and Public Works Director approvals. The landscaping shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. (PW) h. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials, an irrigation plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines. (PW) (Code Requirement) i. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. j. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. k. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 8. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. PLO1-12attfinal 7 03/07/01 4:42 PM INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall not become effective until the ten working day appeal period has elapsed. For projects in the appealable area of the coastal zone, there is an additional ten working day appeal period that commences when the California Coastal Commission receives the City's notification of final action. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is March 5, 2001, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 7. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$43.00 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. 8. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission. 9. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 10. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. (PW) 11. A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Department prior to occupying the building. PLO 1-12attfinal 8 03/07/01 4:42 PM ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/ COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMINT NO. 00-15 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09: 1. The Negative Declaration No�,00-09 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quatity Act(CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty,(30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15. 2. The proposed project, method of ammo la generation, and standard conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the proj ect's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. \ 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Planning Commission that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15�'will have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 for the establishment, maintenance antenance and operation of the Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR) system at AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The SCR system is proposed in order to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from the power plant as mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The\\ammonia necessary for reduction of nitrogen oxide emissions will be generated via a Urea to Ammonia process, which allows ammonia to be generated on an as needed basis. Therefore,the pr�posed project does not include any transport or storage of ammonia. Based upon the conditio s imposed and the proposed project itself, the community will benefit from reduced nitrogen o ide emissions. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because nitrogen oxide emissions from the power generating facility will be reduced, dead and dying 1 scaping will be replaced, irrigation systems will be made 100% operational, and landscaping al ng the south and east perimeter will be intensified. This project is also compatible with surround g uses because installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual uality of the existing facility. The equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. PLO T-12att 1 02/27/01 1:33 PM 3. The proposed Selective Catalytic Reduction at AES Huntington Beach will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beac on and Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed project complies with all development standar of the General Industrial zoning district. 4. The granting f the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with'the Land Use Element designation of Public on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: A. Land Use Elemen Policy L U 2.1.1. Ian and construct public infrastructure and service improvements as demand necessitates to Support the land uses specified in the Land Use Plan (as defined in the Circulation and Public\Utilities and Services Elements of the General Plan). Utilities Element Goal U S: Maintain and exp d service provision(of gas supply, telecommunication, and electricity)to City of Huntington Beach residents and business. Policy U 5.1.1: Continue to work wit service providers to maintain current levels of service and facilitate improved levels of rvice. Policy U 5.1.4: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities w411 not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The existing AES power generating facility is neces�s�ary to provide power to Huntington Beach residents and business owners in addition to the power services provided for the entire Southern California power grid. The new SCR system will benefit residents,property owners, and the Huntington Beach community by reducing nitrogen oxide emissions from the plant as mandated by the SCAQMD. Installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impa t on the visual quality of the existing facility because the equipment will be installed within t e existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plan . The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensifyXthe existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. \� C. Urban Design Element Policy UD 2.2.1: Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. Policies - UD 1.4.1: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. PLO1-12att 2 02/27/01 1:33 PM The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. D. Dra t,Coastal Element Draft Palicy 9a: Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas that does not significantly degrade habitat values and which is compatible with the continuance of the habitat. t Recognizing the1`9eater than local significance of the City's energy resources, Coastal Element policy allows for the continuation, and in some cases expansion, of these facilities while ensuring the community's public health and safety, environmental protection and minimization of negative aesthetic impacts to the maximum extent feasible. The suggested conditions of approval include requirements for AES to improve the quality of existing landscaping around the southern and eastern property lines while also making the irrigation. system 100% operational. The conditions also include language requiring AES to enter into an agreement with the City with.a fair share proportionate bond to cover the cost of landscaping and street improvements for Newland Street. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 for the development project, as proposed or as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The project includes conditions to replace dead and dying landscaping, to make irrigation systems 100% operational, and to intensi landscaping along the south and east perimeter of the power plant. The project complies with the Draft Coastal Element, currently under review by the Planning Commission, which states that landscaping should be utilized to buffer the appearance of existing utility operations. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the C®,verlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The SCR system complies with all aspects of the Coastal Zone overlay and the��General Industrial zoning district. 5�r 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. All infrastructure necessary for the SCR system is either currently available to AES, the property ownerand applicant, or AES will be installing the necessary improvements for the SCR equipment. 4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The existing AES power generating facility nor�the proposed SCR system do not conflict with either public access or public recreation to coastal,amenities. PLO 1-12att 3 02/27/01 1:33 PM CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 29, 2000 shall be the conceptua approved layout. 2. Prior to cleari and grubbing,the following shall be completed: a. Existing mature trees that are to be removed must be replaced at a 2-for-1 ratio with a 36- inch box tree or alm equivalent. Applicant shall provide a consulting arborist report on all the existing trees. Said report shall quantify, identify, size, and analyze the health of the existing trees. The report shall also recommend how the existing trees that are to remain(if any) shall be protected and how far construction/grading shall be kept from the trunk. b. Any work within the public right-of-way will require encroachment permits and traffic control plans prepared to City standards. 3. Prior to submittal for building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the index. b. The Design Review Board and Planning Department shall review and approve plans for intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements around the south, west, and east property lines as required in Condition\�f Approval No. 7. f. The intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements are intended to upgrade the visual quality and aesthetic view of the power generating`station from public right-of-ways. c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the,building plans. (FD) P � 4. Prior to issuance of building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Submit 8 inch by 10 inch colored photographs of all colored renderings and elevations to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file. \ b. The following information and/or plans demonstrating compliance with the following issue areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: 1) Hazards and Operability Study (HAZOPS) for the entire urea to amm nia process and appropriate mitigation measures. (FD) 2) The Urea to Ammonia system shall be designed so that no detectable amm nia odor travels off-site. This requirement can be accomplished by systems such as ater spray or fixed monitors to absorb any release or any other cooling method acceptable to the Fire Chief. (FD) 3) Provide Seismic Zone 4 construction. (FD) PLO1-12att 4 02/27/01 1:33 PM 4) Provide spill control and secondary containment to include equipment,tanks,piping, truck unloading and fixed fire protection system. Secondary containment shall have impermeable surfaces and will be designed to prevent any intrusion into areas where fish,eec. would be destroyed by ammonia solution. (FD) 5) Provid\pplans lectricity control. (FD) 9) Providor redundant alarms, notification devices, and manual override systems. (FD) 10)Provide classified electrical, Class I, Division 2 unless proven unnecessary by a licensed electrical engineer's`r\eview of a certified process engineer's statement that no flammable atmosphere could be present. (FD) 11)Provide certification from`a registered fire protection engineer stating no possibility of explosive dust production fr"o"ohm the urea unloading process. (FD) 12)Provide proof that all tanks, valves, fittings,pipe, etc. are appropriate for the specified products as determined by an appropriate licensed mechanical engineer. Certification to include a list of all codes and sections for appropriate documentation. (FD) c. AES will certify via written statement submitted to the Fire Chief that AES will immediately report any spill or leak to the Fire Department. (FD) 5. Within four weeks of building permit issuance, the following issue areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: a. AES must demonstrate on-site containment and an approved spill mitigation and disposal plan and shall also submit a Spill Release Policy subject to approval by the Fire Chief. (FD) b. Publish and submit an approved Emergency Response Plan and employee training program. (FD) 6. During site development, and/or construction,the following shall be adhered to: a. Use water trucks ors sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep dam enough p Y p p g to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the dray; c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%) by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. PLO 1-12att 5 02/27/01 1:33 PM f. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. 7. Prior to final building permit inspection,the following shall be completed: a. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including: y 1) Landscaping; 2) Fire extinguishers shall be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards found in City Specification#424. (FD) 3) Automatic fire sprinkler and fire alarm system may be required. Fire will need to meet with AES personnel to discuss entire system prior to final permit inspection. (FD) 4) Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification#401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. (FD) 5) If applicable, installation and/or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with"'Orange County Environmental Health and HBFD requirements. Certain areas mayxrequire conformance to City Specification #431, Gas Fired Appliances. (FD) 6) If applicable,this project shall comply with the Cal-ARP program for Hazardous Materials reporting. (FD) ,k 7) Provide installation of protective crash posts. (FD), 8) All hot equipment,pipes, etc. to be insulated. (FD) 9) Meet all general requirements of Huntington Beach Fire Code Section 8001 regarding notification and signage. (FD) b. The applicant shall be responsible for construction the half-width street improvements along the Newland Street frontage of the project site as set forth in the City's letter dated September 23, 1997, from Melanie Fallon to Peter Lersey of SCE. Akan alternative,the applicant may enter into an appropriate agreement, with accompanyingNsecurity, which provides for a cash deposit to be made to the City to pay for the cost of designing and constructing the Newland Street frontage improvements. The City will handle the design and construction of a larger Newland Street widening project extending fro Pacific Coast Highway northerly to Hamilton Avenue using the proportionate contribution om this project as well as from other projects having similar frontage improvement obli ations. (PW) c. Water Ordinance No. 14.52, the "Water Efficient Landscape Requirements" apply for projects with 2,500 square feet of landscaping and lager. (PW) PLO1-12att 6 02/27/01 1:33 PM d. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. (PW) e. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection JPW) f. Intensified landscape planting and/or physical architectural improvements to upgrade the visual quality and`aesthetic view of the power generating facility from public right-of-ways shall be required. Intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements shall be on the south, west,`and the easterly (south-east)boundaries. Owner shall make functional and obtain 100% coverage with the existing irrigation system. New systems may need to be added and dead or dying plant material shall be replaced. Plans shall include sections demonstrating how the ultimate growth of the plant material or architectural changes will help screen the existing plant.\The landscaping and irrigation improvements shall be subject to review and approval of a landscape construction set by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works and Planning Departments. (PW) g. The existing berm, fences, and landscaping within the Newland Street frontage shall removed and new intensified screening shall be reconstructed behind the right-of-way. The new screening shall be subject to Design R view Board, Planning Director, and Public Works Director approvals. The landscapinghall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. (PW) h. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted o the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location,type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials, an irrigation plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines. (PW) (Code Requirement) i. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. j. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. k. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or�Uusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 8. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. PLO1-12att 7 02/27/01 1:33 PM INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall not become effective,until the ten working day appeal period has elapsed. For projects in the appealable area ofrthe coastal zone, there is an additional ten working day appeal period that commences when the California Coastal Commission receives the City's notification of final action. y 2. Conditional Use Permit N,o. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is March 5, 2001, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 06-J 5, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. \ 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00:AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. `: 7. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$43.00 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2)days of the Planning Commission's action. 8. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission. 9. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building ermits. 10. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. W) 11. A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Department prior to occupying the building. PLO1-12att 8 02/27/01 1:33 PM y � � � z ry k �� � � � � . „ � �� ���� �� .� � a LEGISLATIVE DRAFT ATTACHMENT NO. 2 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/ COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMINT NO. 00-15 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09: 1. The Negative Declaration No. 00-09 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty (30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15. 2. The proposed project,method of ammonia generation, and standard conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Planning Commission that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 will have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of the Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR) system at AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The SCR system is proposed in order to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from the power plant as mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The ammonia necessary for reduction of nitrogen oxide emissions will be generated via a Urea to Ammonia process, which allows ammonia to be generated on an as needed basis. Therefore,the proposed project does not include any transport or storage of ammonia. Based upon the conditions imposed and the proposed project itself,the community will benefit from reduced nitrogen oxide emissions. PLO1-12attlegdrft 1 02/27/01 1:34 PM 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because nitrogen oxide emissions from the power generating facility will be reduced, dead and dying landscaping will be replaced, irrigation systems will be made 100% operational, and landscaping along the south and east perimeter will be intensified. This project is also compatible with surrounding uses because installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility. The equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. 3. The proposed Selective Catalytic Reduction at AES Huntington Beach will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed project complies with all development standards of the General Industrial zoning district. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Public on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: A. Land Use Element Policy LU2.1.1: Plan and construct public infrastructure and service improvements as demand necessitates to support the land uses specified in the Land Use Plan(as defined in the Circulation and Public Utilities and Services Elements of the General Plan). Utilities Element Goal U 5: Maintain and expand service provision(of gas supply,telecommunication, and electricity) to City of Huntington Beach residents and business. Policy U 5.1.1: Continue to work with service providers to maintain current levels of service and facilitate improved levels of service. Policy U 5.1.4: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The existing AES power generating facility is necessary to provide power to Huntington Beach residents and business owners in addition to the power services provided for the entire Southern California power grid. The new SCR system will benefit residents,property owners, and the Huntington Beach community by reducing nitrogen oxide emissions from the plant as mandated by the SCAQMD. Installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility because the equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. PLO 1-12attlegdrft 2 02/27/01 1:34 PM C. Urban Design Element Policy UD 2.2.1: Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. Policies- UD 1.4.1: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. D. Draft Coastal Element Drat Policy 9a: Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas that does not significantly degrade habitat values and which is compatible with the continuance of the habitat. Recognizing the greater than local significance of the City's energy resources, Coastal Element policy allows for the continuation, and in some cases expansion, of these facilities while ensuring the community's public health and safety, environmental protection and minimization of negative aesthetic impacts to the maximum extent feasible. The suggested conditions of approval include requirements for AES to improve the quality of existing landscaping around the southern and eastern property lines while also making the irrigation system 100% operational. The conditions also include language requiring AES to enter into an agreement with the City with a fair share proportionate bond to cover the cost of landscaping and street improvements for Newland Street. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 for the development project, as proposed or as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The project includes conditions to replace dead and dying landscaping, to make irrigation systems 100%operational, and to intensify landscaping along the south and east perimeter of the power plant. The project complies with the Draft Coastal Element, currently under review by the Planning Commission, which states that landscaping should be utilized to buffer the appearance of existing utility operations. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District,the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The SCR system complies with all aspects of the Coastal Zone overlay and the General Industrial zoning district. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. All infrastructure necessary for the SCR system is either currently available to AES, the property owner and applicant, or AES will be installing the necessary improvements for the SCR equipment. 4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The existing AES power generating facility nor the proposed SCR system do not conflict with either public access or public recreation to coastal amenities. PLO1-12attlegdrft 3 02/27/01 1:34 PM CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 29, 2000 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to clearing and grubbing, the following shall be completed: a. Existing mature trees that are to be removed must be replaced at a 2-for-1 ratio with a 36- inch box tree or palm equivalent. Applicant shall provide a consulting arborist report on all the existing trees. Said report shall quantify, identify, size, and analyze the health of the existing trees. The report shall also recommend how the existing trees that are to remain(if any) shall be protected and how far construction/grading shall be kept from the trunk. b. Any work within the public right-of-way will require encroachment permits and traffic control plans prepared to City standards. 3. Prior to submittal for building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the index. b. The Design Review Board and Planning Department shall review and approve plans for intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements around the south,west, and east property lines as required in Condition of Approval No. 76. f. The intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements are intended to upgrade the visual quality and aesthetic view of the power generating station from public right-of-ways. c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit 8 inch by 10 inch colored photographs of all colored renderings and elevations to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file. b. The following information and/or plans demonstrating compliance with the following issue areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: 1) Hazards and Operability Study (HAZOPS) for the entire urea to ammonia process and appropriate mitigation measures. (FD) Elispesa „la (FD) (moved to # 5.a.) PLO1-12attlegdrft 4 02/27/01 1:34 PM 3) The Urea to Ammonia system shall be designed so that no detectable ammonia odor gas travels off-site. This requirement can be accomplished by 14-44o g systems such as water spray or fixed monitors to absorb any release or any other cooling method acceptable to the Fire Chief. (FD) 4) 0--a8;+o ,oio.,sa S1,.,11 feet o 0o a 25 pal4s per-mil-1 ...-, de. smell Only. (FD) (combined with#4. b. 3.) 5) Provide Seismic Zone 4 construction. (FD) 6) Provide spill control and secondary containment to include equipment,tanks,piping, truck unloading and fixed fire protection system. Secondary containment shall have impermeable surfaces and will be designed to prevent any intrusion into areas where fish, etc. would be destroyed by ammonia solution. (FD) 7) Provide static electricity control. (FD) 8) Pr-a ,;ao ;,,-st n ti-e- fpr-eteet y@ , asl posts. (FP) (moved to # 7.a.7.) r1, :ne ...ede ro tilts` (F44)(combined with# 4.b.3.) 10)All ho=eqoipmeat, pipes, ts. to be inset . (FD) (moved to # 7.a.8.) program. (ND)(moved to # 5.b.) 1 7\M@et 11 gene,.-al 14tff Aifigtaifi i2o.,..b. Pife rA,.ao So +;,.,-. 9001 1;* (moved to# 7.a.9) 13)Provide plans for redundant alarms, notification devices, and manual override systems. (FD) 14)Provide classified electrical, Class I, Division 2 unless proven unnecessary by a licensed electrical engineer's review of a certified process engineer's statement that no flammable atmosphere could be present. (FD) 15)Provide certification from a registered fire protection engineer stating no possibility of explosive dust production from the urea unloading process. (FD) 16)Provide proof that all tanks, valves, fittings,pipe, etc. are appropriate for the specified products as determined by an appropriate licensed mechanical engineer. Certification to include a list of all codes and sections for appropriate documentation. (FD) PLO1-12attlegdrft 5 02/27/01 1:34 PM c. AES will certify via written statement submitted to the Fire Chief that AES will immediately report any spill or leak,,ring aper-ation-s- at*me- t@ to the Fire Department. nf:of to issuanee Af 5. Within four weeks of building permit issuance, the following issue areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: a. AES must demonstrate on-site containment and an approved spill mitigation and disposal plan and shall also submit a Spill Release Policy subject to approval by the Fire Chief. (FD) b. Publish and submit an approved Emergency Response Plan and employee training program. (FD) 6. During site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. f. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. 7. Prior to final building permit inspection,the following shall be completed: a. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including: 1) Landscaping; 2) Fire extinguishers shall be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards found in City Specification#424. (FD) 3) Automatic fire sprinkler and fire alarm system may be required. Fire will need to meet with AES personnel to discuss entire system prior to final permit inspection. (FD) PLO 1-12attlegdrft 6 02/27/01 1:34 PM 4) Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification#401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. (FD) 5) If applicable, installation and/or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and HBFD requirements. Certain areas may require conformance to City Specification#431, Gas Fired Appliances. (FD) 6) If applicable, this project shall comply with the Cal-ARP program for Hazardous Materials reporting. (FD) 7) Provide installation of protective crash posts. (FD) 8) All hot equipment, pipes, etc. to be insulated. (FD) 9) Meet all general requirements of Huntington Beach Fire Code Section 8001 regarding notification and signage. (FD) b. The applicant shall be responsible for construction the half-width street improvements along the Newland Street frontage of the project site as set forth in the City's letter dated September 23, 1997, from Melanie Fallon to Peter Lersey of SCE. As an alternative,the applicant may enter into an appropriate agreement, with accompanying security, which provides for a cash deposit to be made to the City to pay for the cost of designing and constructing the Newland Street frontage improvements. The City will handle the design and construction of a larger Newland Street widening project extending from Pacific Coast Highway northerly to Hamilton Avenue using the proportionate contribution from this project as well as from other projects having similar frontage improvement obligations. (PW) c. Water Ordinance No. 14.52, the "Water Efficient Landscape Requirements"apply for projects with 2,500 square feet of landscaping and lager. (PW) d. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. (PW) e. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection . (PW) PLO1-12attlegdrft 7 02/27/01 1:34 PM f. Intensified landscape planting and/or physical architectural improvements to upgrade visual quality and aesthetic view of the power generating plant from public right-of-ways and i gation shall be required. for- ser-eenifig in . 4ditia *� :stif+g living material An site Intensified landscaping and/or physical architectural improvements shall be on the south, west,ba+iadat-y and the easterly (south-east) boundariesy. Owner shall make functional and obtain 100% coverage with the existing irrigation system. New systems may need to be added and dead or dying plant material shall be replaced. Plans shall include sections demonstrating how the ultimate growth of the plant material or architectural changes will help screen the existing plant. The landscaping and irrigation improvements shall be subject to review and approval of a landscape construction set by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works and Planning Departments. (PW) g. The existing berm, fences, and landscaping within the Newland Street frontage shall be removed and new intensified screening shall be reconstructed behind the right-of-way. The new screening shall be subject to Design Review Board, Planning Director, and Public Works Director approvals. The landscaping shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. (PW) h. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location,type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials, an irrigation plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines. (PW) (Code Requirement) i. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. j. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. k. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 8. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. PLO 1-12attlegdrft 8 02/27/01 1:34 PM INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall not become effective until the ten working day appeal period has elapsed. For projects in the appealable area of the coastal zone,there is an additional ten working day appeal period that commences when the California Coastal Commission receives the City's notification of final action. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is March 59 Desem-be•• 1-2-, 2001, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15,pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 7. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$43.00 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. 8. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission. 9. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 10. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. (PW) 11. A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Department prior to occupying the building. PLO1-12attlegdrft 9 02/27/01 1:34 PM // \ / 3" �`Y / � � - � � f \ 5` h \ �`� _ ` ``� %//j � .. n, //% F�R� � Jar \\\\tea ,�' � arw a '`.��` .., � ,,,,\�\`� fir.. „„�„,✓ ,. �'� .< /r�r ... ....�\. �`�` �i�, � �.o ��. 02/20/01 19:38 FAX 7143741495 AES HUNTINGTON BEACH LLC 1@ 002 ntington Beach, L.L.C. February 20, 2001 Mr.Howard Zelefsky Director of Planning City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA-92648 Dear Mr.Zelefsky: 'We greatly appreciate the efforts of Staff and the Fire Department to enable Item D-2 to be on tffe agenda of tonight's City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting. A number of the conditions proposed by the Fire Department reflect an attempt to address some of these issues. Unfortunately, certain of these conditions are inconsistent with our understanding of the issues asdiscussed with the Fire Department. Perhaps more importantly, certain conditions appear to be impossible for AES to comply with as part of the SCR installation and operation. As you know,this process has been accelerated due to the critical timing needs associated with the provisions of electricity_ As a result,we only received the proposed condition language late on Friday, February 16, 2001. With the weekend and holiday,there was absolutely no time to address these concerns raised by the language of the conditions. Thus, in order to provide an opportunity to continue to work with the Fire Department and to clarify the conditions discussed above,we respectfully request the hearing be extended until the next meeting- Sincerely, Ed Blackford President AES Huntington Beach L.L.C. Cc:Mayor Pam Julien Houchen City Council Michael P. Dolder, Fire Chief 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax(714)374-1495 awr'4 e [calm CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTCW 8EACH css TO: Mayor and City Council VIA: Ray Silver, City Administrator FROM: William P. Workman Assistant City Administrator SUBJECT: AES CUP Conditions DATE: March 5, 2001 Attached is a letter from AES requesting a change to the proposed CUP Conditions related to units 3 &4. WPW:pf Attachment Motington Beach, L.L.C. March 5, 2001 RECEIVED Mr. William P. Workman Assistant City Administrator CI7Y0FN,(t,--,,_,.�. City of Huntington Beach R0�lIAlIS C3 2000 Main Street P.O.Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Dear Mr. Workman: This letter is in response to our discussions last Friday. As you know, AES has been working closely with the City to resolve concerns raised by the appeal of Negative Declaration No. 00-09, Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15. Those issues concerned the safety and environmental aspects involved with the use of aqueous ammonia. AES believes the results of this collaborative effort are accurately reflected in the revised conditions of approval. The original conditions of approval also included certain enhancements to Newland Street, as well as intensified landscaping of site perimeters. AES recognizes that landscaping enhancements have been and continue to be a significant priority for the City. To that end, AES supports the retention of the intensified landscaping requirements found in the revised conditions of approval, and is committed to meeting those requirements. However, until now, it does not appear that the City ever viewed physical or architectural improvements as falling within its landscaping priority. More importantly, we feel that there is simply no nexus between the proposed requirement for AES to make physical or architectural improvements at the site and any potential impacts associated with this project. Thus the insertion of the language"and/or physical architectural improvements" into the revised conditions of approval is not appropriate and we therefore ask that it be removed. If this were not reflective of our discussion on Friday, we would appreciate hearing from you prior to the upcoming hearing. Please contact me at 714-374-1444 with any further questions on this matter. Sincerely, Ed Blackford President AES Huntington Beach L.L.C. 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax(714)374-1495 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 /GTON t-'' . �VHTINGTpy RTH LN BEACH 92646 co C�•CO,xnee.cl�`<c0 TO aENC)ER�� € T U i�f?�i� .�_—� _� uNTr '�`f L�14N-rj Slaw.1 fii ...E!ii:...'ieiiIiiii!i....:'i�° G 1 b-�rT f ANCWI AND WIDE A PART CIF fL00FD A _ C� 001)NCL ITMiG OF �FfiCE F MTY CLER V CONME XIXKWAY,CITY CLERKCS -Odk ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES MEM GOAL ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES GREG GILBERT Director Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC Market Development Sacramento Office P.O.Box 1030 Newcastle,CA 95658 Email:ggilbert@glet.com Tel:(916)663-6343 Celt:(916)719-5472 Fax:(916)663-6353 i www.glet.com C:3,AAk ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE City of Redding Selects SCONOx for Power Plant (December 12, 2000) REDDING, CA — The City Council of Redding unanimously approved the fast-track purchase of SCONOx for its new 43 MW natural gas power plant. Redding will buy the 43 MW natural gas plant and SCONOx GT system from Alstom Power Inc., Goal Line's Licensee for the SCONOx GT. Alstom supplies about 20 percent of the world's power turbines and is the world's largest builder of power plants. The city's SCONOx purchase was profiled in the Redding Record Searchlight. The newspaper reported that "the generator will use a new platinum-based technology called SCONOx that promises to scrub about 90 percent of the carbon monoxide and nitrous oxide it would otherwise pump out its stack" according to Redding Electric Utility Director Jim Feider. The newspaper also reported that"City Manager Mike Warren noted that the air pollution control technology adds about $3 million to the price of the plant. `This turbine will have the least effect on the environment of any that we know of in the United States,' he said." In its press release on the Project, the Redding Electric Utility said "REU cares greatly about the environment and the Project is being designed for use of the Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for emissions, as required by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Shasta County Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The Project will utilize the revolutionary new SCONOx technology that reduces emissions by 90 percent. This system has been specifically designed to meet the stringent federal, state, and local pollution limitations. The SCONOx system employs a regenerative process in the form of a single catalyst for the removal of both carbon monoxide and nitrogen emissions. This system uses no ammonia or other hazardous materials in its process." Goal Line Environmental Technologies, LLC, is a privately held manufacturer and developer of catalytic products for air pollution control and distributed generation fuel cell systems. Its patented technologies include a portfolio of catalytic solutions to the expanding deregulated electricity market, industrial manufacturing, distributed power generation and transportation industries — ranging from large power plants to reciprocating engines and fuel cells. SOURCE: Goal Line Environmental Technologies, LLC www.glet.com CONTACT: Allan Bedwell (865) 671-4045 Ext. 33 or abedwellglet.com CE �.. i ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Allan Bedwell (865) 671-4045 x33 Revolutionary SCOW)&Technology for Large Gas Turbines Commercially Available from ABB Alstom Power In an action that will dramatically clean the air around the world, ABB Alstom Power has announced the commercial availability of SCONOx°GT for large gas-fired turbines. ABB Alstom Power is the world's largest builder of power plants and pollution control systems for power plants. ABB Alstom Power has licensed SCONOe GT from Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC of Knoxville, TN. Goal Line is an emerging world leader in the research, development and manufacturing of air pollution control catalyst and processes. "We are extremely pleased and excited that SCONOe GT is available to power developers around the world from a high quality, world class power plant builder. SCONOe GT will enable power plants to be more easily sited in rapidly expanding deregulated utility markets in the U.S. and around the word," stated Thomas Girdlestone, CEO of Goal Line. "We've completed the testing and we're now offering it for sale with performance guarantees," says Bob Hilton, Global Product Manager, DeNOx & SCONOx° at ABB Alstom Power's Environmental Systems unit. "While we're targeting the largest turbines commercially available, we can scale it down to any other gas turbine as well. And regardless of the OEM, we'll quote it firm and guarantee the performance." Over the past 5 years the SCONOx° technology has been successfully demonstrated in small and mid size gas-fired power plants. The technology reduces NOx, CO and VOC emissions to near-zero levels, significantly below U.S., European and Asian emission standards. SCONOx° GT is currently controlling NOx emissions below 1 part per million at gas turbine installations in California and Massachusetts. ABB Alstom Power is Goal Line's exclusive licensee of SCONOx° GT for power plants larger than 100 MW and non-exclusive licensee for power plants between 10 MW and 100 MW. Under this licensing agreement, ABB Alstom Power will provide new and existing gas-fired turbine power plants with Goal Line's revolutionary SCONOe GT system. For further information, please visit Goal Line's website at www.glet.com or ABB Alstom's website at abb-astom-power.com. A copy of ABB Alstom Power's press release is attached. COAL- L.1 r%%J=� ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CATALYTICNeWS Vol. 2, Issue 3 OR CLEAN AIR November CUMMINS INVESTS DIESEL DEMO GRANT t, Goal Line has received a grant to demon- IN GOAL LINE Cummins Engine Company has made strate its SCONOx IC-D technology for PM-10 REDUCTION an equity investment in Goal Line, diesel engine emission control from the CaliforniaAir Resources Board's Innova- GUARANTEE expanding the partnership between true Clean Air Technology Program. The the two companies. Goal Line and Goal Line is now offering PM-10 reduction Cummins have been working together grant enables Goal Line to demonstrate guarantees in addition to NOx,CO and emission reductions of NOx,Hydrocarbons VOC reductions on select SCONOx GT for a year and a half on reducing diesel and VOC on a stationary diesel engine. installations. With prices for PM-10 emissions. offsets and ERCs soaringh as$5 800s, E � o�` ' as high � ., FORMALDEHYDE per pound,millions of dollars can be saved on projects that emit fine particulates or }_ EMISSIONS require PM-10 offsets. : The U.S.EPA has determined that SCONOx GT achieves the lowest emission rate of formaldehyde from gas turbines. Accord- ingSCONOx to the federal agency,SCONOx SIMPLE CYCLE PERMIT achieves a 97%reduction in formaldehyde, Standard Power&Light of West Chicago, a known carcinogen. The U.S.EPA's has submitted an air permit to the Illinois emission factor guidance,AP-42,can be EPA to use SCONOx GT on simple cycle downloaded at www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ turbines. The permit for the facility seeks ap42c3.htm1. anew limit of 3 ppm NOx,1.5 ppm CO Investment finalized by Thomas Girdlestone and less than 1 ppm VOC emissions from (R), Goal Line Chairman& CEO, and DRAMATICALLY REDUCE Cummins VP for Strategic Planning& a variety of simple cycle gas turbines, Investor Relations, Charles Wochomurka(L). NATURAL GAS COSTS ranging from Pratt&Whitney FT8 Twin Pacs to General Electric Frame 7 FAs, "Our partnership with Cummins With natural gas prices soaring,Goal Line totaling 840 MW in generating capacity. provides needed capital to accelerate can save your company tens of thousands On other simple cycle projects around the sales of our products," said Thomas of dollars a year in fuel costs by retrofitting the country,Goal Line is guaranteeing Girdlestone,Goal Line's Chairman and your thermal oxidizers with ADCAT VOC emission rates as low as 1 ppm NOx and Chief Executive Officer."This investment catalyst. Goal Line's ADCAT VOC oxidizes 90%reduction in CO and VOC. creates a platform to capitalize on VOC emissions at 450-700°F,which is less worldwide opportunities for the distribu- costly than the traditional temperatures of SCONOx GT tion,sales and service of our catalytic 1400-1500°F. Contact Goal Line at 21 000 HOUR REPORT products for the utility,distributed 815.444.0291 orgmasonick@glet.com. power, transportation and process SCONOx GT has logged over 21,000 industries." GOAL LINE E U RO P E hours of operation at Sunlaw Energy On December 1, Goal Line will begin selling Corporation's Federal Plant in Vernon, "We are impressed with Goal Line's and marketing its advanced catalytic California. Over 4,400 hours,more than products and their potential to be a technologies throughout Europe. Based in six months,have been logged at emission major catalyst technology supplier to Zurich,Switzerland,Goal Line Europe will rates lower than 1.3 ppm NOx and 1 ppm worldwide clean energy markets,"said market and sell SCONOx and SCOSOx for CO on a 15-minute rolling average. Christine Vujovich,Cummins'Vice gas turbines smaller than 100 MW,industrial Sunlaw and Goal Line have documented President of Environmental Policy and boilers,process heaters,utility boilers,and this performance in a report,available Product Strategy. "This is a strategic sulfuric acid and Claus tail gas applications. from Kristie Henderson at Goal Line at investment for Cummins and for clean In addition,Goal Line Europe will market and 888.777.4538,khenderson@glet.com, energy." Vujovich will serve as Cummins' sell ADCAT CO for power generation and or at www.sunlaw.com or www.glet.com. representative on Goal Line's Board. ADCAT VOC for industrial applications. ©2000 Goal Line Environmental Technologies, LLC Z£6L£ N1'0ll!Ax0u}1`aA11(]pllnO 1bl11 S319010NH0311VJLN3 W N0U IAN3 NEWS BRIEFS r_ w SCONOx IC-D FOR DIESEL ENGINES PROGRESSING Goal Line continues to develop SCONOx IC-D for stationary and mobile diesel engines. This year, NEW CO CATALYST SALES REP NEW CONTROLLER SCONOx and SCOSOx catalyst Abe Rosenstein has joined Goal Line as Goal Line has welcomed Greg Gentry as performance was demonstrated on national sales representative for ADCAT the company's new Controller. Greg is diesel exhaust at Goal Line's test CO catalyst. Mr.Rosenstein has extensive managing the day-to-day financial facilities in Knoxville. expertise in CO catalysts,with over 15 operations of the company,including The next phase of R&D for product years in the CO catalyst industry,working procurement, accounts payable and development is focusing on low for such companies as Engelhard Corpora- accounts receivable.Greg,a University temperature regeneration efficiency tion. Abe can be reached at 908.226.5161 of Tennessee graduate,was a branch and desulfation characterization. or aosenstein@glet.com. manager for Sun Trust Bank prior to Improvements in low temperature joining Goal Line. regeneration efficiency are already NEW PRODUCTION being seen. These results demonstrate MANAGER the NOx performance of SCONOx IC-D ACCOUNTING ADDITIONS over a broad range of diesel engine Steve Hess has joined Goal Line as Larry Van Guilder has been appointed temperatures. Goal Line's advanced Manufacturing Manager,managing Chief Accountant,with the responsibilities SCONOx IC-D formulations have catalyst production and regeneration of accounts payable,payroll and cost shown the ability to desulfate at lower services, including cost control,quality accounting. Also joining the accounting temperatures of 3500C to 450°C,in control and purchasing. Steve comes to Goal Line from a Production Supervisor team is Kem Mantooth,who comes to Goal addition to the desulfation range of p Line with 14 years of banking,credit and 6000C to 7000C exhibited by traditional position at John Deere's Loudon, accounting related experience. NOx absorber catalysts. Tennessee Plant. TWO NEW PATENTS NEW ENGINEERING NEW SALES ASSOCIATE Goal Line has received two new patents ASSISTANT Kristie Henderson has joined Goal Line's from the U.S.Patent Office. These patents Nicole Barber has joined Goal Line's sales&marketing staff as a sales associ- cover new catalyst technology that engineering department as an engineering ate,providing support to the company's controls indoor ozone. The catalyst assistant,helping respond to the growing national sales&marketing team. She removes pollutants from air inside number of RFQs and project requests for previously served as a marketing develop- buildings and vehicles. These two patents Goal Line emission control products. ment assistant at Coca-Cola Enterprises bring the total number of Goal Line patents Nicole has a B.S.in Chemical Engineering and holds a B.S.in Communications from to 13,with several more patents pending. from the University of Tennessee. the University of Tennessee. - Contact: Bob Hilton (865) 694-5377 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ABB ALSTOM POWER TO SUPPLY GROUNDBREAKING SCONOxTm TECHNOLOGY New system reduces gas turbine NOx emissions to below 2 ppm, Including F-Class combined cycle applications KNOXVILLE, Tenn. —December 1, 1999—The Environmental Segment of ABB ALSTOM POWER has completed a scale up/commercialization of the revolutionary SCONOxTM clean air system and is now offering the technology—with performance guarantees—to all owners and operators of natural gas-fired combined cycle combustion turbines, regardless of size or OEM. The SCONOxTM system is considered revolutionary because, unlike traditional selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technologies, it does not use ammonia to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. The system employs a precious metal catalyst and a NOx absorption/regeneration process step that converts carbon monoxide (CO) and NOx to CO,,H2O and N2 without limiting gas turbine performance. Environmental Systems initiated a successful scale-up program that verified its mechanical reliability and emission reduction capabilities on large-scale applications— particularly F-Class machines used in combined cycle applications. This included gas turbine field tests on units 32 MW and 5 MW in size that achieved NOx levels below 1 PPm• "We've completed the testing and we're now offering it for sale with performance guarantees," says Bob Hilton (Global Product Manager, DeNOx & SCONOx) at the Environmental Systems. "While we're targeting the F-Class machines, we can scale it down to any other gas turbine as well. And regardless of the OEM, we'll quote it firm and guarantee the performance." The Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established the lowest achievable emission rate (LAER) system for large gas turbine NOx abatement based on SCONOx performance, establishing the technology as a performance standard against which future abatement means will be judged. In addition, SCONOx can greatly reduce a power producer's emission fees and offset costs, and thus offers a simplified and lower- cost permitting process for new and retrofit applications. ABB ALSTOM POWER is offering SCONOx to the power industry via a licensing agreement with Goal Line Environmental Technologies, L.L.C. Goal Line was formed by Sunlaw Energy Corporation and Advanced Catalyst Systems, Inc., to develop and manufacture catalysts and catalytic systems for the destruction of volatile organic compounds from a broad range of industries, including printing, furniture, automobile and power generation operations. Knoxville-based Environmental Systems httn://www.abb.com/envsys is a unit of ABB ALSTOM POWER. ABB ALSTON POWER is a jointly owned company formed with ABB and Alstom combined their power generation activities. As a world-leading supplier of power generation services and equipment, the new company has revenues of $1 1 billion and employs approximately 58,000 people in more that 100 countries. TECHNICAL BACKGROUND The SCONOx system uses a single catalyst for the removal of NOx, Co and volatile organic compounds (VOC). The process uses no hazardous materials—on the contrary all utilities required to operate the system (natural gas, steam, water, ambient air and electricity) are already present at a combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plant. The SCONOx catalyst simultaneously oxidizes NOx, CO and VOCs. NO2 is absorbed onto the catalyst surface through the use of a potassium carbonate coating. The SCONOx catalyst undergoes regeneration periodically to maintain the maximum NOx absorption. The oxidation absorption regeneration system results in ultra-low emissions. The catalyst is regenerated by passing a controlled mixture of regeneration gases across its surface in the absence of oxygen. The regeneration gases react with the nitrites to form water and elemental nitrogen. Carbon dioxide in the regeneration gas reacts with potassium nitrites and nitrites to form potassium carbonate—the absorber coating that was on the surface of the catalyst before the oxidation absorption cycle began. Water(as steam) and elemental nitrogen are exhausted up the stack and potassium carbonate is once again present on the surface of the catalyst allowing the oxidation absorption cycle to begin again. There is no net gain or loss of potassium carbonate: the process operates as a true catalyst. System Configuration A typical arrangement has ten or 15 sections of catalyst, although the number can vary on each system depending on size and other special design requirements. At any given time 80 percent of these rows are in the oxidation/absorption cycle and 20 percent are in the regeneration cycle. Because the same number of rows is always in the regeneration cycle, the production of regeneration gas always proceeds at a constant rate. A regeneration cycle is typically set to last three to seven minutes, so each section is in the oxidation/absorption cycle for 12 to 28 minutes. Ideally suited to both new and retrofit applications, the SCONOx system can operate effectively at temperatures ranging from 300 to 700 degrees F and does not limit gas turbine performance. A SCONOx unit can be installed at the back-end of the boiler or within the HRSG within the same envelope reserved for an SCR system. c a � , t . NONE- "n - IWAW No 7x sOR A, A"I Y �� X� "P, yu£� :- :`V"� ,,;,�. ` 4 < '•x,$w.,'' -.,.F,L, ss';-+ `' "F b rr 4� _° e� T-3 "d, i `� y- fl3 .c. 71W 01 �s The Sconox system uses a single catalyst for the removal of NO, CO, VOCs and S02. The process uses no hazardous materials and is comparable in total cost to selective catalytic reduction. It is now available for use in all sizes of gas turbines to meet the new US national NO,, emissions rate of 2 ppm. PG&E Generating has filed an air permit application to use Sconbx on its new 510 MWe Otay Mesa power plant in San Diego County,California. Staff report G&E Generating has filed an air meet future"zero ammonia"standards across (OEM).The scaleup programme verified the it application to use the USA. ", em's mechanical reliability and emission Sconox on its new 510 MWe, ABB Alstom Power's Environment Segment reduction capabilities on large-scale applica- ABB Alstom GT24 powered, announced on 2 December, 1999 that it has tions- particularly F-Class machines used in (hay Mesa combined cycle completed a scale up commercialisation of the combined cycle applications. This included power plant in San Diego County, California system, saying that the US Environmental gas turbine field tests on emits of 32 MWe and (see Figure 1).PG&E's permit application seeks Protection Agency (EPA) has now declared 5 MWe in size that achieved NO,levels below an initial NO,limit of 2.0 ppm and a target rate Sconox to be the lowest achievable emissions 2 ppm and below I ppm respectively. of 1.0 ppm. rate system for large gas turbines. If it receives approval from all the appropri- On 4 and 10 February 2000, respectively, The catalyst ate agencies,the$350 mullion project should the EPA rejected air permit applications for The Sconox system uses a single platinum/alu- be in operation by the summer of 2002,It will two 500 MWe combined cycle plants in minium catalyst for the removal of NO„CO and then be the first new power plant that it has California, Elk Hills and Three Mountain, cit- volatile organic. compounds (VOC). The been possible to build in San Diego County in ing that both projects' permit analysis "im- process uses no hazardous materials. On the three decades.PG&E said in its air permit ap- properly rejected Sconox as an available contrary,all utilities required to operate the sys- plication:"The Sconox technology has control control technology."As well as the NO,-emir- tem(natural gas,steam,water,ambient air and of NO,CO,and VOC.The project will be the sions advantages,EPA also referred to the fact electricity')are already available in combined first to apply this technology for achieving very that, unlike Selective Catalytic Reduction, cycle power plants. low emission rates in this combustion turbine Sconox does not use ammonia as a reduction The Sconox system can operate effectively size range,ie a permit limit of 2.0 ppmvd NO., agent,so there are no problems of"ammonia at temperatures ranging from 150°C to 370°C, (at 15 per cent O,)average - a target of 1.0 slip"(ie unreacted ammonia passing through making it well suited to retrofit applications. ppmvd NO,(at 15 per cent O-,)on a 24 hour the stack).The EPA said that in assessing SCR, The Mod 1I Sconox system retrofitted to average." "The handling, transport,and storage of am- Samlaw's 32 MWe i 12500 Federal cold storage Recently, Sunlaw Energy Corporation filed monia should also be evaluated as well as the warehouse plant(see Figure 2)operates at the an air permit application to use Sconox at its potential for some ammonia slip to react with `cold'end of the heat recovery steam genera- 510 MWe Nueva Azalea combined cycle plant gaseous emissions of sulphur oxides and NO, for(HR.SG)at approximately 1G0°C. Because in Los Angeles,California,which seeks an ini- to form ammonium sulphate and ammonium the heat recovery steam generator(lid not have tial NO,limit of 1 ppm and an initial CO limit nitrate."This seems to establish a very clear to be split in half to install the system,installa- of 0.5 ppm. mandate by EPA for all proposed power plants tion was completed within only eleven days of Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC, to not only evaluate Sconox,but also address plant downtime. the inventor and licensor of Sconox,is now of- the potentially harmful effects of ammonia. In December 1999,Goal Line established a fering the Sconox emission control system for ABB Alstom Power is now offering Sconox, world-wide manufacturing agreement with the incorporation on all sizes of gas fired power with performance guarantees, to all owners Sod Chemuc Group to manufacture the catalyst plant.The system is designed to meet the new and operators of natural gas-fired combustion for gas turbine driven plants in their produc- national NO,emissions rate of 2 ppm and also turbines regardless of gas turbine supplier tion plants in many countries. March 2000 Modern Power Systems 23 be isolated from exhaust gases. This is ac- complished using a set of louvres(Figure 3), one upstream of the section being regenerat- ed and one downstream.During the regener- ation cycle, these louvres close and valves I allowing fresh regeneration gas into and spent < regeneration gas out of the section open as L shown in Figure 4.Stainless steel sealing strips on the isolation louvers provide a durable and effective barrier against leaks during opera- tion. 4 The Federal Mod It Sconox system has twelve sections of catalyst,each of which is 3.2 in wide,0.6 in high,and 0.9 in deep.At any given time nine of these rows are in the oxidation/absorption cycle and three are in the regeneration cycle. Because the same number of rows is always in the regeneration cycle,the production of regeneration gas al- ways proceeds at a constant rate.A regenera- tion cycle typically is set to last for three to five minutes,so each section is in the oxida- tion/absorption cycle for nine to fifteen min- utes. The regeneration gas generator Regeneration gas is produced by reacting nat- ural gas with oxygen from ambient air. The The Siid Chemie Group includes United KNO2+KNO2+4H,+CO,—ip K,CO2+ technology for producing hydrogen from nat- Catalysts Inc., Siid Chemie AG, Prototech 411,O(g)+N, (4) ural gas is well developed, and there are nu- Company, Nissan Girdler Company and merous reactions by which this can be Catalysts&Chemicals Far East,which between Water(as steam)and elemental nitrogen are accomplished. them have some 60 manufacturing and sales exhausted up the stack instead of NO,, and The Mod II Scono"x system uses a Was gen- companies throughout the world. potassium carbonate is once again present on erator produced by Surface Combustion, a the surface of the catalyst, allowing the oxi- company that has made its name manul'actur- The oxidation/absorption cycle dation/absorption cycle to begin again.There ing similar units for the heat treatment indus- The Sconox catalyst(see Figure 3)works by is no net gain or net loss of potassium car- try. This unit uses a two-stage process to simultaneously oxidising CO to CO,, NO to bonate after both the oxidation/absorption produce hydrogen and carbon dioxide.In the NO,,and then absorbing NO2 onto its surface cycle and the regeneration cycle have been first stage,natural gas and air are reacted across through the use of a potassium carbonate ab- completed. a partial oxidation catalyst at 1040°C to form sorber coating.These reactions are referred to Because the regeneration cycle must take carbon monoxide and hydrogen. as the"oxidation/absorption cycle place in an oxygen free environment, a sec- Steam is added to the mixture,which is then tion of catalyst undergoing regeneration must passed across a low temperature shift catalyst, CO+1/20,—]IN co (1) NO+ 1/2O, o NO, (2) Regeneration gas outlet(2) 2NO,+KX0, CO,+KNO,+KNO3(3) y, Exhaust stack The CO,from reaction(1)and reaction(3) Louvres dosed Regeneration is exhausted up the stack. as inlet(1) during regeneration � .n g During this cycle,the potassium carbonate .: Low pressure coating-reacts to form potassium nitrites and . nitrates,which are then present on the surface heat recovery steam generator of the catalyst.Eventually the Sconox catalyst becomes saturated with NO.,and must be re- " generated High pressure heat The regeneration cycle recovery steam generators Regeneration of the catalyst is accomplished by passing a dilute hydrogen reducing gas across the surface of the catalyst in the at-.).- Exhaust transition Bence of oxygen.The hydrogen in this gasi reacts with the nitrites and nitrates to .� form water and elemental nitro- a - gen. Carbon dioxide in the Turbine package a Cam" regeneration gas reacts / with potassium nitrites and r nitrates to form potassium carbonate,which is the ab- sorber coating that was on the surface of the catalyst _ before the cycle began as — Sconox catalyst blocks in reaction(4): `� �� Closed Isolation louvres ROM 3.Layout of open Isolation louvres scolex catalyst 24 Modern Power Systems March 2000 forming carbon dioxide and more hydrogen. 114M 4.HOW This mixture is then diluted to under4 percent hydrogen using steam,although another inert COWArsbe d gas,such as nitrogen,can be used for this put- S by pose as in reactions(5)and(6): SCOW SSA SCOM GH,,+ 1/2O,+ 1.88N2 )►CO+2H,+ � V�2 1 88N, (5) CO+2H,+H2O+1.88N, )o CO,+3H,+ 1.88N, (6) �C j/'©� For current Sconox installations, the need /��/x for a conventional gas generator is eliminated, thus reducing the cost of the system.The re- S�X generation gas is produced by passing steam and natural gas across a steam reforming cata- lyst at temperatures between 315°C and Louvres 500°C.The catalyst reforms the methane to hy- drogen in the presence of steam.The resulting Scrubber steam gas product is a 2 per cent hydrogen gas con .<. Natural gas centration in steam. The regeneration gas is Scosox Sconox Ambient air generated and consumed on-demand, result- catalyst catalyst ing in no by-product generation. Lowest ever NOX Turbine Model Taurus 50. In 1998 and 1997, the US EPA declared On 1 December, 1999, Goal Line report- The SCOSOX sulphur removal Sconox as achieving the Lowest Available ed that the 5 MWe Solar Taurus 50 system system Emission Rate(LAER)for NO,abatement.In with the Sconox GT system at the Genetics The Scosox system works in conjunction with 1998,Sconox received Cal-EPA's prestigious Institute in Andover,Massachusetts,was re- the Sconox system and removes Sulphur com- Environmental Technology Certification.For during NO,emissions to a one-hour rolling pounds from the exhaust stream.It utilises an two years Sconox has been successfully op- average down to 0.5 ppm. This broke the oxidation/absorption cycle and a regeneration erating on a commercial basis in the electric- previous air pollution reduction record of a cycle just as the Sconox system does, but its ity generating industry and has. virtually 15 minute rolling average of 0.75 ppm since absorption cycle favours SO;instead of NO.. eliminated stack emissions of NOC,CO,VOCs I April, 1999 in the first commercial instal- Chemical reactions for the Scosox system ox- and SO,from power generation. lation at the 32 MWe Sunlaw Federal cold idation/absorption cycle are:. The Sconox system is comparable in total storage warehouse in Los Angeles (see cost to Selective Catahrtic Reduction(SCR). Figure 5). CO+ 1/20, —0. CO, (7) Suitable for both new and retrofit applica- For gas turbine installations larger than 100 tions,Sconox does not limit gas turbine per- MWe in size,ABB Alstom Power is Goal Line's SO,+1/20, —3 SO, (8) formance,and can be installed at the back end exclusive licensee of Sconox GT.For gas tur- of the boiler or in the HRSG within the same bines less than 100 MWe in size, Sconox GT SO3+SORBER —0. [SO3+SORBER] (9) envelope reserved for an SCR system. is available from both ABB Alstom and Goal Goal Line Environmental Technologies re- Line. For gas turbines less than 10 MWe in The reaction for the regeneration cycle is cently completed the commissioning of its size, Sconox GT is available only from Goal also similar to that of the Sconox catalyst: second commercial Sconox GT installation at Line. Goal Line also offers the Sconox tech- the Genetics Institute in Andover, nology for industrial boilers(Sconox IB)and [SO3+SORBER]+4H2 Hs+3H2O(10) Massachusetts.The Sconox GT system is con- stationary natural gas internal combustion en- trolling the emissions of a 5 MWe Solar gins(Sconox IC-N). Note that the regeneration gas used for the both types of catalyst is the same(hydrogen), allowing them to be regenerated simultane- 1.20 ously.The Scosox catalyst is placed upstream of the Sconox catalyst,and enhances the effi- ciency of NO,absorption as well as removing 1.00 Sulphur compounds. The sorbent is propri- etary. 1-1, :1 M I Lim I Equation(10)above is valid for Scosox in- 0.80 stailations that operate at temperatures below 260°C.At higher temperatures,hydrogen sul- E CL phide does not come off during the regenera- 's 0.60 1 tion process,as Sulphur compounds come off z as SO, A typical arrangement has 10 or 15 sections OAO j of catalyst,although the number can vary on each system depending on size and other spe- cial design requirements.At any given time 80 0.20 per cent of these sections are in the oxida- tion/absorption cycle and 20 per cent are in the regeneration cycle.. 0.00 a, N to w a, N w w W N w oo a, N w r) m r '.w w W N w N w va W W a N CD w 7 a! P v N 0 c0 0 00 N w N O W Since the same number of rows is always in N to w v w W N N co W o w w o the regeneration cycle,the production of re- I May tune July generation gas always proceeds at a constant rate.A regeneration cycle is typically set to last three to four minutes.so each section is in the ' oxidation/absorption cycle for 15 to 20 min- utes. March 2000 Modern Power systems 25 ;r • • • • 'f . ,., p *`t s ,•: i,-� +o,1 ? • .ate i r�y t �.. p ♦ E • • F_ SCONO)e Catalytic Absorption System Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................3 2 TECHNOLOGY.........................................................................................................................................4 2.1 HISTORY................................................................................................................................................4 2.2 PROCESS.................................................................................................................................................5 2.2.1 SCONOe..................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 SCOSW......................................................................................................................... ......... 7 3 EQUIPMENT............................................................................................................................................9 3.1 REACTOR ASSEMBLY..............................................................................................................................9 3.2 REGENERATION GAS PRODUCTION.........................................................................................................11 3.3 REGENERATION GAS HEAT RECOVERY/SCRUBBER..................................................................................11 3.4 SCONOx®CoNTRoL SYSTEM...............................................................................................................12 4 RESULTS FROM THE FEDERAL SYSTEM........................................................................................13 5 FEATURES&BENEFITS......................................................................................................................15 6 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS.............................................................................17 7 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.............................................................................................................17 Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 2 SCONOx®Catalytic Absorption System 1 Introduction Sunlaw Energy Corporation and Advanced Catalyst Systems, Inc. formed Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC in 1992, combining Sunlaw's experience in power plant development and operation with ACS's extensive catalytic research and development expertise. Goal Line's process for control of CO, NOx, VOC, and SOx emissions from combustion processes such as turbines, boilers, lean-burn engines and a variety of utility and industrial applications has demonstrated the capability to reduce emissions below detectable levels on natural gas fired systems and does not require injection of ammonia or other chemicals. This technology is called SCONOia. The SCONOx®system is a breakthrough in pollution control technology that utilizes a single catalyst for the reduction of CO, VOC and NOx. The system uses no ammonia or other hazardous materials, and can operate effectively at temperatures ranging from 300°F to 700°F, making it well suited for both new and retrofit applications. The system produces no toxic by-products, and requires that no chemicals be brought on site for its operation. Because the inputs that are needed to run SCONOx®(natural gas, water, steam, electricity, and ambient air) are already present at most power plants, the logistics of plant operation do not change when the system is installed. SCONOx® offers many advantages when compared to competing technologies. By requiring no ammonia the system eliminates operating and permitting concerns generated with ammonia and its by-products. As regulations change, SCONOx® also has the capability to reduce emissions to lower levels by simply adding more catalyst. SCONOx® is a highly effective, yet simple catalyst abatement solution to increasingly stringent VOC, CO and NOx regulations. Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 3 SCONOx®Catalytic Absorption System 2 Technology 2.1 History In 1988 when Sunlaw Energy Corporation needed to retrofit its two natural gas fired power plants to meet new emission requirements that were coming into place, they looked at existing technologies and found them either economically or environmentally undesirable. With the help of General Electric they developed a program of water injection that was capable of reducing their NOx emissions to 25 ppm. This, however, was not low enough to meet proposed regulations. Installation of a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system at the required temperature location would have entailed cutting their HRSG in half and moving it ten feet downstream. This would have resulted in a capital cost of more than $2.8 million, not including downtime costs of$25,000 per day for a period of two months. Sunlaw concluded that the best option for pollution control was to research and develop their own system. A partnership was formed between Sunlaw and Advanced Catalyst Systems, a catalyst development and manufacturing firm. The results of their efforts were Goal Line Environmental Technologies and the SCONOe catalytic absorption system. The Mod I system, commissioned on May 14, 1995, was based on a moving hood design that proved the SCONW concept and was used as a test installation to accumulate design and operating data. Enough information was obtained so that the prototype unit could be decommissioned in June 1996 and the catalyst removed for use in the Mod II system at the Federal plant. With the wealth of design and operating data accumulated from SCONOx® Mod I at the Growers plant, Mod li was commissioned on December 20, 1996 at the Federal facility, and has been running continuously in base load operation since that date with highly successful results. Sunlaw Energy Corporation operates two cogeneration plants in the Los Angeles industrial basin in the city of Vernon. The plants are known as the Growers Plant and the Federal Plant based on their supply of refrigeration capability to the Growers and Federal cold storage plants nearby. Both the plants are designed as cogeneration units with a guaranteed electrical output of 28 MW on a year round basis. The prime mover is a natural gas fired GE LM 2500 gas turbine fitted with evaporative coolers and water injection capability for power enhancement. Both plants were commissioned in 1986. Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 4 SCONOe Catalytic Absorption System 2.2 Process The SCONOx® system utilizes a single catalyst for the removal of both carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide emissions. It uses no ammonia or other hazardous materials in its process and requires that no deliveries of chemicals be made in support of its operation. All utilities required to operate the system (natural gas, steam, water ambient air, and electricity) are typically already present at a natural gas fired power plant. The SCONOx® system can operate effectively at temperatures ranging from 300OF to 700°F, making it well suited for retrofit applications. Figure 1 shows a typical SCONOx® unit at a natural gas tired power plant. Figure 1: Typical SCONOxo installation in a natural gas fired power plant. Regeneration Gas Outlet(2) Exhaust Stack Louvers closed during regeneration Regeneration -. ;tea a as Inlet(1) Low Pressure Heat { Recovery Steam Genera { x High Pressure Heat c ` s �r Recovery Steam Generators � --,.y , ti Exhaust Transition �o sa Turbine Package - s s r- ` r i . CONOVO Catalyst Blocks Closed Isolation Louver Open Isolation Louver Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 5 SCONOx®Catalytic Absorption System 2.2.1 SCONO)e (1) Oxidation/Absorption Cycle The SCONOx® catalyst works by simultaneously oxidizing CO to CO2, hydrocarbons to CO2 + H2O, NO to NO2, and then absorbing NO2 onto its surface through the use of a potassium carbonate absorber coating. These reactions are shown below, and are referred to as the "Oxidation/Absorption Cycle". CO + %02 4 CO2 NO + '/02 4 NO2 CH2O + 02 4 CO2 + H2O 2NO2 + K2CO3 4 CO2 + KNO2 + KNO3 The CO2 in the above reactions exhausts up the stack. Note that during this cycle, the potassium carbonate coating reacts to form potassium nitrites and nitrates, which are then present on the surface of the catalyst. This reaction can be compared to a sponge absorbing water—just as a sponge becomes saturated with water and must be wrung out before further absorption can take place, the SCONOx® catalyst becomes saturated with NOx and must be regenerated. When all of the carbonate absorber coating on the surface of the catalyst has reacted to form nitrogen compounds, NOx will no longer be absorbed, and the catalyst must enter the regeneration cycle. (2) Regeneration Cycle The regeneration of the SCONOx® catalyst, one of the features that makes the system so unique, is accomplished by passing a dilute hydrogen reducing gas across the surface of the catalyst in the absence of oxygen. The hydrogen in this gas reacts with nitrites and nitrates to form water and elemental nitrogen. Carbon dioxide in the regeneration gas reacts with potassium nitrites and nitrates to form potassium carbonate, which is the absorber coating that was on the surface of the catalyst before the oxidation/absorption cycle began. This cycle is referred to as the "Regeneration Cycle", and the relevant reaction is shown below. KNO2 + KNO3 + 41-12 + CO2 4 K2CO3 + 41-12O + N2 Water (as steam) and elemental nitrogen are exhausted up the stack instead of NOx, and potassium carbonate is once again present on the surface of the catalyst, allowing the oxidation/absorption cycle to begin again. There is no net gain or net loss of potassium carbonate after both the oxidation/absorption cycle and the regeneration cycle have been completed. Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 6 SCONOe Catalytic Absorption System Because the regeneration cycle must take place in an oxygen free environment, a section of catalyst undergoing regeneration must be isolated from exhaust gases. This is accomplished using a set of louvers, one upstream of the section being regenerated and one downstream. During the regeneration cycle, these louvers close and a valve allowing regeneration gas into the section opens. Stainless steel sealing strips on the isolation louvers provide a durable and effective barrier against leaks during operation. A typical SCONOx®system has five to fifteen sections of catalyst, although this number can vary depending on the size and special design requirements of the individual system. At any given time eighty percent of these sections are in the oxidation/absorption cycle and twenty percent are in the regeneration cycle. Because the same number of sections are always in the regeneration cycle, the production of regeneration gas always proceeds at a constant rate. A regeneration cycle typically is set to last for three to five minutes, so each section is in the oxidation/absorption cycle for nine to fifteen minutes. 2.2.2 SCOSOx® (1) Oxidation/Absorption The SCOSOe Sulfur Removal Catalyst works in conjunction with the SCONOxe system and removes sulfur compounds from the exhaust stream. The SCOSOx® catalyst favors the absorption of sulfur compounds instead of NOx, and works to enhance the efficiency of the SCONOx®process in the removal of NOx. The SCOSOx®catalyst is placed upstream of the SCONOx®catalyst (Figure 2) and have the same cross-sectional dimensions as SCONO)e blocks, but will not be as deep. It utilizes the same oxidation/absorption and regeneration cycle as the SCONOx®system. Chemical reactions for the SCOSOx®system oxidation/absorption cycle are shown below. CO + '/02 4 CO2 S02 + V02 4 S03 S03 + SORBER 4 [S03 + SORBER] (2) Regeneration The reaction for the regeneration cycle is also similar to that of the SCONO)e catalyst. The regeneration gas used for the SCONOx® and SCOSOx® catalyst is the same (hydrogen), allowing them to be regenerated simultaneously. Depending on the operating temperature range of the system in the process gas, Goal Line offers two versions of the SCOSOx® product. These products are identified as SCOSOx®"Low Temperature" and SCOSOe"High Temperature". Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 7 SCONO)e Catalytic Absorption System SCOSOxe "Low Temperature" operates in an exhaust stream between 300OF and 700°F. SCOSOxe "High Temperature" operates in an exhaust stream between 450OF and 700°F. Typically, the method used for regeneration for temperatures less than 450OF is direct hydrogen injection. For applications of greater than 450OF direct methane injection is employed. When Methane is used the regeneration reaction is: [S03 + SORBER] + CH4 4 S02 + CO2 + H2O + SORBER Capture of sulfur compounds from an exhaust stream using the SCOSOx® process is greater than 95%. When incorporating the SCOSOx® process into the SCONOx® system, several options exist for the treatment, if desired, of the spent regeneration gas. SCOSOe catalyst blocks have the same cross- sectional dimensions as SCONOxe blocks, but will not be as deep. (Figure 2: Flow diagram showing SCOW catalyst upstream of the SCONOe catalyst. i a; as a a a M20 as a as aaaE:�> ZX a aaa Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 8 SCONOx®Catalytic Absorption System 3 Equipment 3.1 Reactor Assembly Each installation will have a SCONOx® reactor assembly, where each assembly is composed of modules that contain four to five sections. Each section will have a set of louvers to be closed when the section is in the regeneration mode. Louvers will have stainless steel "S" seals to help isolate the section during regeneration. Each section will also have one inlet and two-outlet regeneration gas valves to open when the section is in the regeneration mode. One section in each module will be in the regeneration cycle at any given time. The reactor assembly modules house all catalyst in sections as previously described. Each module is comprised of a system of louvers that alternately close off and seal each section of the module, front and back for regeneration. The reactor assembly is designed to support the dead and live (seismic, wind) loads of the catalyst and equipment (i.e., valves, actuators). Thermal stresses and expansion in the operating range for the particular application are also considered. Each reactor assembly will be comprised of the following basic items: (a)A frame supporting discrete portions of catalyst having a front facing toward exhaust inlet, a back facing away from exhaust inlet and two closed sides; (b)A moveable louver covering the front and back of each discrete section for independently sealing each section from exhaust gas; (c) A manifold for each module connected to each discrete section to carry regeneration gas to the center of the section; and (d) A manifold for each module connected to each end of each section to carry spent regeneration gas away. Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 9 SCONO)e Catalytic Absorption System Photo 1: SCONOe Reactor Module a.. � t n R Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 10 SCONOe Catalytic Absorption System 3.2 Regeneration Gas Production Regeneration Gas is made up of two components, Reaction Gas and Carrier Gas. Reaction Gas is the "active ingredient" in the regeneration of the SCONO)e catalyst. It contains hydrogen that reduces NOx to nitrogen and water, as well as carbon dioxide, which regenerates the potassium carbonate absorber coating. The regeneration gas consumption is directly proportional to the amount of catalyst to be regenerated. Typically, natural gas is 1 to 2% of the regeneration gas flow and the regeneration gas flow is typically 1 to 4% of the exhaust gas flow. Regeneration gas is supplied at the same temperature t50°F as the exhaust gas temperature entering the SCONOx®sections. The Regeneration Gas Mixing Assembly contains all pressure reducing valves, flow meters, flow control valves, and other equipment necessary to ensure the correct ratios of ambient air, natural gas, and carrier gas (i.e., steam) that are introduced into the SCONO)e catalyst for regeneration. For installations below 500OF the SCONOx®system uses an autothermal reforming gas generator designed by Goal Line. Reacting natural gas, steam, and oxygen from ambient air produces regeneration gas across a single catalyst at temperatures between 900OF and 1000°F. The catalyst module used for producing the regeneration gas will be heated using gas turbine exhaust taken from upstream of the HRSG. Because the flow rate of regeneration gas is low(approximately 1%) compared to the exhaust gas flow, HRSG performance will not be significantly affected. The regeneration gas will be diluted to under 4% hydrogen using steam as a carrier gas. The appropriate reaction for producing regeneration gas is given below: CH4 + °/202 + H2O 4 CO2 + 3H2 For installations with operating temperatures greater than 500°F, the auto-thermal reformer is not required. The catalyst can be regenerated by simply introducing natural gas and carrier gas, such as steam, to the SCONOx® catalyst. If steam is not available, a package boiler system can be provided to produce the carrier gas. 3.3 Regeneration Gas Heat Recovery/Scrubber Steam is used as a carrier gas for the regeneration of the catalyst. The volume of steam is typically from 1 to 4% of boiler capacity. In order to recover this heat a heat recovery system may be desired. The heat recovery also reduces gas volumes that need to be scrubbed if the operating temperature is less than 450OF (due to 1-12S formation). If the operating temperature is greater than 450°F, S02 will be formed and can be reintroduced into the exhaust gas stream behind the catalyst bed. The heat recovery system will typically consist of a shell and tube heat Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 11 SCONOx®Catalytic Absorption System exchanger that will preheat the boiler feed or some other media where heat can be beneficial. 3.4SCONOx®Control System The SCONOx® system is controlled by an Allen-Bradley Programmable Logic Loop Controller (PLC). This controller is programmed to control all essential SCONO)e functions, including the opening and closing of louver and regeneration gas inlet and outlet valves, and the maintaining of regeneration gas flow to achieve positive pressure in each section during the regeneration cycle. A LabViewTM program run on a Pentium® PC supervises the system. The LabViewTM program monitors, records, and reports system performance. It sends notifications and warnings when appropriate, and it allows the user to control the system by changing set points, such as pressures, regeneration cycle times, and flows. The PLC can, however, operate independently of the LabViewTM program. A PC crash or loss of power will not interrupt the operation of the system. An Allen Bradley Panel View can also be used as the Man to Machine Interface Device. System control can also be incorporated into HRSG packages to eliminate redundancies. Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 12 SCONOe Catalytic Absorption System 4 Results from the Federal System The SCONOx® system has achieved remarkably low CO and NOx emissions over the 24 months of operation that are complete as of this writing. The Federal system (Photo 2) has averaged less than 2 ppm NOx and under 1 ppm CO for this period, with initial start up NOx levels of 0.6 ppm having been recorded. These emissions levels make the Federal plant the cleanest fossil fuel fired power plant in the world--and without ammonia emissions. The SCONOx® system can achieve these low levels of NOx emissions partly due to the fact that emission levels into the catalyst system are kept at about 25 ppm NOx through the use of water injection, which also augments the power output of the plant. The SCONO)e system was designed to work in conjunction with hydroaugmentation or Dry Low NOx technology. Because of the nature of the system, which relies on an absorber to remove the NOx, it is on this type of application that SCONOx® is most effective. This leveling off of the NOx readings was noted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency in its letter that sets the Lowest Achievable Emissions Rate for gas turbines based on results from the Federal SCONOx® system. The LAER determination of 2.0 ppm by the EPA indicates that had the Federal plant been permitted at that level of NOx emissions, it would not have been out of compliance during the six-month period on which that determination was based. Because of the composition of the SCONOx® catalyst, which is basically an oxidation catalyst with Goal Line's special absorber coating applied to it, the system oxidizes CO, VOC, and HAPs emissions as well as removing NOx. CO oxidation is typically about 95%, even at temperatures as low as 320°F, the temperature at which the Federal system operates. VOC destruction is greater than 80% for non-methane hydrocarbons, and destruction of HAPs such as formaldehyde and acetaldehyde have been measured at 97% and 94% respectively at 300°F. The percentage destruction is expected to rise at higher temperatures. The mechanical portion of the SCONNO system has been extremely reliable over the 24 months that the system has been in operation. No downtime has been incurred by the Federal plant from problems experienced by the SCONOe system. Because the Federal SCONO)e system was designed with only the isolation louvers themselves exposed to the exhaust gas stream, maintenance of the system can be performed while the plant is on line. Should a louver actuator fail, the affected row would be placed in "maintenance mode" on the PLC system, which would then skip that row in the regeneration process. Louvers can be closed manually using a hand. wheel if necessary, and this allows the repair of the system with only a small increase in NOx (perhaps 0.3 ppm) and back pressure (perhaps 0.5" H2O). Once the affected section is placed on line again, NOx and back pressure levels return to normal. Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 13 SCONO)e Catalytic Absorption System errs a „mac �r' y,fi ss �`c" X !:'' "' 3^ a 4 a.= r d: s Photo 2: SunlavWs Federal plant showing the SCONOxe modules just to the left of the stack. The SCONO)e system is completely automatic in its operation, and once placed on line requires only minimal attention from plant operators, such as would normally be given to other plant equipment while taking daily readings. Start up of the system is easily accomplished with a few clicks of the mouse. Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 14 SCONOe Catalytic Absorption System 5 Features & Benefits The SCONOx®system offers many advantages compared to competitive technology. Some are listed below: No Ammonia or Ammonia Compounds • Eliminates expense of ammonia • Eliminates the need for a significant commitment of resources to obtain a permit for the use of ammonia, which is recognized as a hazardous material • Saves the space taken by large ammonia storage tanks • Eliminates the need for site.access, safety barriers, etc. for large tank truck deliveries • Eliminates the need for high maintenance ammonia equipment, such as ammonia pumps • Limits the liability exposure/insurance • Eliminates the need and costs for ammonia safety requirements, and the associated risk management prevention plan, which involves hazard assessment, a prevention program, and an emergency response plan • Allows a plant to be located in a populated area—no hazardous ammonia is required to be stored or transported, and there is no ammonia leakage from the stack • Eliminates the possibility of accidental catalyst contamination from aqueous ammonia that is not made from pure demineralized water; • Eliminates concern by neighboring residents as voiced in public hearings • Shortens the time required to obtain a permit • Eliminates the need for ammonia injection grids that are necessary to thoroughly mix ammonia into the turbine exhaust gas; • Eliminates dependence on regular on-time truck deliveries • Eliminates concerns regarding the formation of ammonia sulfate and ammonium bisulfate on downstream heat transfer surfaces-- ➢ This allows for the design of economizer heat exchangers made from less expensive alloys that would suffer corrosion damage if ammonia salts could precipitate on economizer surfaces. ➢ This also maintains the thermal efficiency of the economizer by preventing the economizer from being coated with ammonia salts. ➢ This also eliminates the labor costs involved with periodic washing of the economizer to remove accumulated ammonia salts. Sulfur is Removed in the SCOSO)e Process • Allows use of a variety of fuels and fuel combinations; Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 15 SCONOx®Catalytic Absorption System • Minimizes S03 in the exhaust that can cause sulfuric acid- (H2SO4) to form at low temperatures. — SCONOx®Catalyst Destroys Both CO and NOx • One pollution abatement catalyst for both pollutants; • For retrofit applications, .precious metal can be salvaged from existing CO catalyst to reduce the cost of the retrofit; • Significantly reduces NOx emissions during cold starts — Operates Over a Wide Temperature Range (300°F-7000F) • Allows flexibility in the design of new or retrofit systems; • In SCR replacement or performance upgrade cases, SCONOx® fits into existing SCR spool pieces; • Can be retrofitted to the low temperature exhaust of existing systems; • Can be located in the cooler sections of new systems where gas flow velocities have become relatively uniform after passing through heat exchangers, thereby eliminating the need for flow straighteners; • There is no need to split the boiler; • Fits into empty spool pieces intended for SCR installation. — Provides Ultra-Low CO and NOx Emissions • Meets present LAER standards, and possible future requirements; • Reduces air permit approval process time, and associated carrying costs; • Reduces environmental lobbying, both regional and local; • Reduces public relations costs; • Reduces legal fees in the air permitting process; • Reduces public hearing preparation costs; • Reduces the time spent at public hearings; • Eliminates the need for future emissions control system upgrades; • Simplifies emissions transport studies; • Provides potential for NOx offsets or credits. — Utilizes Louver Isolation System • Allows isolation of catalyst sections while plant is shut down for heat retention purposes-- ➢ This allows the plant to be started more quickly, since the catalyst and HRSG are closer to operating temperatures; ➢ This also significantly reduces any NOx spikes during cold starts. Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 16 SCONOx®Catalytic Absorption System 6 Future Development and Applications The LAER determination by the EPA has caused a great deal of interest to be generated in the SCONOx®system. Much of this interest is from power generators who are looking for new ways to reduce NOx, CO, and SOx from applications other than natural gas fired turbines. Although Goal Line does not currently offer the SCONOe system for direct fired boilers or reciprocating engines and it is not available for use with coal fired plants, laboratory work has been performed using gas compositions typical of these applications. The SCOSOe Sulfur Removal System has brought the SCONOx® system into consideration as a candidate for providing NOx and CO control for applications using higher sulfur fuels, such as #2 diesel oil or coal as a primary fuel source. Goal Line is currently performing tests on stationary & mobile internal combustion diesel engines. NOx emissions from a 50 kilowatts diesel generator with a SCONOASCOSOe retrofit emissions control system have been reduced by greater than 98%. Field demonstrations and commercialization for these engines is rapidly progressing. The ultimate development of the SCOSOx®system will be a stand-alone technology for the removal of large amounts of sulfur from various processes. Testing has been performed on applications with up to 3000 ppm SOz. The SCOSOx®system will play a large role in sulfur emissions control from most stationary and mobile sources. 7 Additional Information For additional information, please visit our web page at www.glet.com. Also, feel free to contact the authors at 1-888-777-GLET (4538). Goal Line Environmental Technologies LLC 17 r, d jT i fie; n°�"4+ '�;;iV�,�7� �� 7 r .,�� w J 1'J,. .1 �� „� �"+' n'' Yn a i� �,, i q! uM+ r, �fi it a 1 •4•�+ � i rr�a�<. 4 u r CA BJB P T µt tF p, ij u i2 I m � "4 i '�'�y `. I•" �' �yn"„a. f k �� "' >� � :;1 �d J7 -p t rl�:wr i 11 �Si�,�{4 II l.II 3M �rfil Pl�t�t S.:IMy1i 9 Ip, . v i., � � ,✓; �.t :. '� '''. � N " i�' i ! ! +ui i3 4 rCv Yt a 5}'l��� i i fi� } 1. in f as aY v i t A+ir}Ftkifr!' Y. r/,�•��', „�I„>o�a Sig i� ' O k� U���"ry�'� 'i yi 9�fd F�7i°'�a��F4+�7'"f azi�..j��,"r7��n°jf.a•�+ari�r{ f �' � N+cr�p F;artavrimMm•�'' �' nt��' q �r(ka ,A ' r .f%.�P ub°';' •ar Li All ip, a { •�.x 'vI 'a���tywu' �"'°' '°�! /d,/` � �{3�n ,� �G .,,Ar �t , +r+r ! �, � � V r � 7 i' ^'�, rf' 'l k i IT Lp'iM f; .f�' ,, m �,dj`( ! �in-: iI ,.;s +"�'$'"".�.:. .. r';'.'-( +w � ��-.•' ': � P'!��t�w � ini"r7 r .{� ' !tr�'r Ifi'v�t �. '4��r"(' ihY'p M M x"r w rTpi 'CO3 �a;?+'rcy:Yine �rtir�7` r ; " ■� araraau 10 " s i'+ d a f• , : ,> :� ''- ti :. x, M �� �."ir , '� t 'iij r iII j4'„+ °i i�,Wiv, J !', � r r ik A••'it:: , f G •-• -: .. .. `ta" :: , " -z: ..r 4 (r .T�} >".w...�"'4 �'w'"fD7.+;,, °�Al{ P ..- •�. `.�. ,;:I " 9'ai ri of n! � ,.i 7 I; ;.,� � '` �„��t��, .,. .f, f • -GI: t 'ht :, t .,� s 'I +r '�"Y e :.Ii 7 q ;� 1 7l ! a %i4 ti°v4• a r " y .!:.:, '•"', ,:'. ' i .>� r.' i1 � P,�,�Y �fy 4' rn fi::� n,Mlrrai �1' r*} 7a�""@ e, w'v y. .✓a n J :. �. .. ! J /.,, ♦ �t f 7! br ita „! k{ t r 7 C>ti^1 :4 1 Yt,.af,:! J v aL�:I:ap,r r r" +r,�j+�1$a A+rr. ,,•(� t �� �. .;": �� "" ci rv�. �'. + r' '•a .t(i"' r�s }},,�.'�� .."�O,w/�.i � �tr �r { � "ti1rt,v.�� �" to°£+�a;r�: tg i ti .i:; R � ��� f 1 is � r a'eH ! p "4-7 f Y�':{ •� '�''� m a,� t a h �. -0 - .✓' "i d afis 7+ My }rr +r t tr:'ytrxu ,+„ai •;k ar � i Yr1 f, Y r 9 rr'1�i ^ :.Yr••.� 4 A'yr i Y� .ii G v 3 f�,«.:.`n� �r:: i r y i;-:5 + •;jn!� !P ,�ir. � � " �" a,w t� '" f! .n s r t v ,, � w •� x i (,1 �„ ,{•!e i f �r �•� � � r a p � o- a :� �,M 7 r� ,r�� y`� a v , ?SFt, 171 .�l / {'a / �.,w-• .. J 7,':'Nr '4a< f 7+s far t7..;, !r Id t.+:i �" An�`Yrnn`x' trt ," rat,P I': 1 s '' r Y ,: � � ;: r/,�� ��u i' J/�/,�.. � I;�: s{i/j n ''r i� � � �• .;y rat "^r ��:A � 'n ,' r Ak, 1 Y,! � / P d� I 14 I 4"t'fTl N: Frn"•p Cr. 51 41.vt ing �" ", a/ ;••�� t,x a r�^bv,�+'A�f: ,r ��µ �°: r;� av +'::C%x,3y °� ,'&Mir�d;t,:°' n.§k w. w „w. r , ,' r .. x r,.� r. �• .'��� ., ,� . ..� �/ .'. ., ,', t , t' ! S A4''k r Y rant "� 7 ^rrq�9"-,i '!"'kw �+�„�ds�.F,rM„F 3�� f � +t`., ...., i � ,/. a �•4 i +z�r a da xl rr 1 9b t v ro .�$`;_ -: .a,,� ://'y ,; .-., _:^:', ... _ .' ,rg - *'lai�+'g nu�n�I:�d7+t�aa++ +v ?��r„yN�V�a'pub^�°�1r�'�+��'a�Maua�•'��-�� �Fr�C� prM ��; " 11. r. 'F ;,, ! •".^.� i". �., '..: • '^.,f�! ��^;. •," r�, � �"¥-.n,a�at���'`.$Ad+r�t*ax as Yr`Ht ��i'�`�w.a �"� �} t��d � a{ar, + d" '; ( w �y''��, x� rrw K r�'I�'�'�sr1�,�•r4 �v�a ++"n Ny:. „1` �' Y / � i-� ,� P�drFyl �•# "a�,�..,t�'�;�� ����,'.'�� � w�? ,t YM1�31f Y", r. ,->2 � ,t�'n:'•r".ap rr`i a9;h ti :•l r 1/�:/ ,...�.. � �'% .k � ;-n' Y".AI�" � .9t d "'f�,'1�'' �"� f �.f for gas turbines There's No Better System. And No Ammonia, Either. In 1998 and 1997,the U.S.EPA declared SCONOXT" the Lowest That's right.With SCONOx—unlike conventional Selective Achievable Emission Rate(LAER)for NOx abatement— Catalytic Reduction(SCR)systems—there is no ammonia to be establishing it as the standard against which future abatement supplied to the system.And no ammonia slip. means will be judged. SCONOx reduces NOx,CO,VOC,and formaldehyde SCONOx greatly reduces emission fees and offset costs,and emissions as never before,with no production of PM2 5 thus offers a lower cost and simplified permitting process for new constituents such as ammonium bisulfate and ammonium nitrate. and retrofit applications.SCONOx can be designed to provide an No ammonia means no risks associated with on-site storage or equal or lower pressure drop than an SCR system at comparable transport through communities concerned about this hazardous emission levels. material. Whether you're operating at less than 1OMW or greater than 30OMW,SCONOx is your solution to increasingly stringent regulations. Regeneration Gas Outlet(2) Exhaust Stack How SCONOx Works. Louvers closed during regeneration „ The SCONOx system utilizes a Regeneration single catalyst for the removal of Gas Inlet(t) NOx,CO,and VOC.The process Low Pressure Heat ,..., Recovery Steam Generator uses no hazardous materials—on the contrary,all utilities required to operate the system(natural gas, High Pressure Heat steam,water,ambient air,and Recovery Steam Generators electricity)are already present at a -_: natural gas fired power plant. Exhaust Transition Turbine Package = SCONOVI Catalyst Blocks Closed Isolation Louver Open Isolation Louver Ideally suited to both new and retrofit applications,the SCONOx GT system can operate effectively at temperatures ranging from 300'F to = 700'F,does not limit gas turbine performance,and can be installed at the back end of the HRSG,or within the same envelope reserved for an SCR system. ABB Environmental,Inc.is Goal Line's exclusive SCONOx licensee for „x gas turbine applications greater than 100 MW and a non-exclusive ' SCONOx licensee for less than 100 MW.Goal Line provides catalyst and technical support for all installations. ryi SCONOx GT system in place. SCONOx" for natural gas i.c. engines MEOW Goal Line has adapted its LAER-setting SCONOx technology to natural gas - fueled internal combustion(IC)engines.The SCONOx IC-N technology utilizes a multi-chamber design,based upon gas turbine operational experience and NSCR catalytic system designs. Because SCONOx IC-N reduces NOx,CO,and VOC more than 90%in lean burn exhaust,the technology enables IC engines to operate with higher efficiency,higher power output,and lower cost than competing technologies.The modular,compact design of the system with limited , ancillary equipment results in simple operation and installation. Operational benefits of SCONOx IC-N include: SCONOx IC-N dual chamber system • Flexibility to tune engine for maximum performance regardless of emission levels. • Extended engine life due to cooler combustion temperatures compared to rich burn settings. • Increased fuel savings over rich burn natural gas engines. Goal Line is currently developing the SCONOx IC-D, • Control of multiple air pollutants with a single catalyst. system for diesel-fueled IC engines.To date, • Significantly reduced emissions on cold starts due to low SCONOx performance on diesel engines is temperature performance. impressive:a 98%reduction in NOx,hydrocarbons, . • Ability to meet existing and future emission standards for any size and CO. lean burn engine. TM . . SCONOX : for industrial boilers With NOx LAER and BACT standards for control.SCONOx IB now provides that low SCONOx IB is a simple catalytic industrial boilers approaching 5 ppm,there cost emission control while reducing NOx, system that does not use harmful reagents is a pressing need for low cost emission CO,and VOCs by 90%. such as ammonia or ozone.Designed for new or retrofit installations,SCONOx IB operates over a wide temperature range of t 300'F to 700'F and occupies a small (, equipment footprint. The dual reactor design allows one x chamber to be in the normal operating mode of oxidation/absorption while the `pE other chamber is regenerating.With its simple design and high efficiency, SCONOx IB provides the most economic solution to meet increasingly stringent emission standards. SCONOx multiple chamber design. SCONOx IB catalyst chamber with catalyst in place. TM I SCIISOX Goal Line's recent advance in pollution SCOSOx moves beyond traditional SCOSOx is highly effective for process- control is SCOSOx—a highly efficient Sox abatement technologies with advan- es such as power plants,petroleum refiner- and cost-effective process for removing tages such as: ies,sulfuric acid plants and other chemical sulfur components from exhaust streams. Higher efficiency Sox removal; processes where Sox is generated. SCOSOx combines Goal Line's propri- Lower capital cost; etary absorption technology with catalytic Minimal energy consumption; oxidation in a single reactive bed. Lighter size and smaller footprint; SCOSOx can be designed to concen- Simple design and configuration for trate S02 for recycling or reclamation. lower maintenance costs. TM Catalytic solutions that meet ---------- Goal Line Environmental Technologies is Goal Line catalysts and catalytic an emerging leader in catalytic products processes are integrated into OEM that eliminate emissions of products and systems.At the same time, NOx,SOx,CO,VOCs and Ozone from we develop customized solutions for electric power plants,industrial individual customers. manufacturing facilities,and internal Whether you are designing a new ��� combustion engines. facility or preparing to retrofit an existing Goal Line's catalysts are so effective one,Goal Line has a broad range of they eliminate the need for future upgrade advanced catalytic processes to meet your of emission control systems.Just as needs. - '= importantly,our catalysts are proven Goal Line serves our customers with a to significantly reduce capital and staff of sales and marketing experts who operating costs. make it their business to have a thorough Goal Line offers a wide variety of catalysts. Goal Line's core strength is its ability knowledge of each customer's needs.Our to rapidly research,develop and R&D staff works with our engineering manufacture a broad range of innovative group,applications group,and catalytic products. manufacturing group to develop efficient, innovative,and cost-effective pollution control solutions for each specific application. i i , F �uUn - � All of our catalyst products undergo thorough ! - reactor testing and field verification before release. r , Like the SCONOx unit seen here at center,all products and processes provided by Goal Line integrate readily into customers'new and current systems. MEMEL , fgq 4 . mm for 1 Oc �Co & X d ruction ME NN 2-1= a Pop%, Aa Rai"UN •• ADCAT 3-WAY:Goal Line's metal ADCAT VOC:Goal Line's high activity ADCAT Spherical:Goal Line's high monolith honeycomb catalyst replaces catalyst delivers maximum VOC spherical catalyst provides maximum traditional NSCR and CO/HC catalysts destruction with minimum operating VOC destruction with minimum catalyst for gas engines.Goal Line provides quick costs.ADCAT VOC enables oxidation at volumes.VOC emissions of less than turnaround for any geometry much lower temperature and with fewer 1 ppm are achievable with Goal Line's in cell densities of 25 to 700 cells per byproduct pollutants than traditional precious metal spherical catalyst. square inch. thermal oxidizers. Goal Line will guarantee your emissions ADCAT CO:Goal Line's oxidation using our catalyst technologies for both catalyst offers high conversion with high new and retrofit installations - flow rates over a wide range of The engineers at Goal Lme are- temperatures at low cost.Goal Lines ready to work for you in designing; metal catalyst is a proven performer in the sizing,and supplying yourt emission , h IA. face of increasingly stringent regulations. control process for ower "eneration yb and industrial manufacturing We also offer complete catalyst management services. Call us toll free at 888/777-4538 ` ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES Corporate Office Los Angeles Office Chicago Office Worldwide Web: www.glet.com 11141 Outlet Drive PO Box 58324 685 Saddle Ridge Knoxville,TN 37932 Los Angeles,CA 90058 Crystal Lake,IL 60012 Toll-Free:888/777-4538 Phone:865/671-4045 Phone:323/233-2224 Phone:815/444-0291 Fax:865/671-4047 Fax:323/233-7428 Fax:815/444-0292 01999 Goal Line Environmental Technologies,LLC•Rev A 11/99 Printed in USA E CE®AL_ to l l**�. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES Catalytic solutions for clean air ADCAT TM Spherical Catalyst Goal Line's high performance spherical catalyst provides maximum VOC destruction with minimum catalyst volume. ADCAT Spherical Catalyst combines high geometric surface area with low operating temperature to effectively reduce VOCs at minimal cost. VOC emissions of less than 1 ppm are achievable with Goal Line's precious metal spherical catalyst. ADCAT Spherical Catalyst offers high _ temperature stability, high crush strength, r increased longevity and superior performance. I With its state-of-the-art laboratories, Goal Line also offers catalyst revitalization, non-destructive performance testing and precious metal recovery. ADCATTM Spherical Catalyst: Technical Specifications Properties - =Units "Specifications - Bead diameter inch 1/8 3/16 1/4 5/16 Bulk density Ib/ft3 41-45 43-47 43-47 43-47 Surface area m2/gram 180-200 180-200 180-200 180-200 Maximum temperature T 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Abrasion loss %wt 10 10 10 10 Bed depth inch 6-18 6-18 6-18 6-18 Lower explosion limit % 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 Maximum space velocity hr-' 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 i Crush strength Ibs 30 40 70 85 ADCAT11 Spherical Catalyst Performance Industries Served: W INS - h rocesst 5 T u p j ggg �s t E att W oatlr) 3c ADCATTM Spherical provides: Inquiries: Send us specifications, drawings or gas stream data and we • 95-99°lam Destructlori$�ffiCienCleS ti will provide you with a custom-tailored solution to your -`` specific application. Goal Line also provides analytical and Lovv Ope'ratmg Temp2tatllteS technical services to assist in determining your current � s - emissions and catalyst performance. • Long Catalyst Llfe - Goal Line is a proven leader in the catalytic control of NOx, I sox, CO, VOCs, and ozone for manufacturing and industrial High Crush StrengtCh applications as well as for the power generation industry. • Hlgh GeonnetrlCt%db Area Goal Line Environmental Technologies, LLC _ „ High Temperat [r Stability 11141 outlet Drive Knoxville,TN 37932 ` • Low,Maintenance Phone: (888) 777-GLET(4538) Fax: (865) 671-4047 Lovv Pre sure Oro,P, ; zT www.glet.com i 4_ C®AI l-lrN%JEE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES silmzlll Catalytic solutions for clean air ; -;~��'-'���� »� �' '--�--` ADCATm3-Way NSCR ��::� .:�y:s: � -•` '1�,-.. �-- . Catalyst Will Goal Line's metal monolith honeycomb catalyst replaces traditional NSCR and COMC catalysts for internal combustion engines. High surface area metal substrate up to 700 cpsi provides superior destruction with minimum catalyst volume to exceed U.S. EPA emission requirements for NOx, CO and hydrocarbons. Goal Line's catalyst production capabilities provide quick delivery of any metal catalyst module in cell § n densities from 25 to 700 cells per square inch. Ceramic blocks and ceramic cemented assemblies are also available. Our catalysts are easily integrated into new or retrofit applications. The durable construction and proprietary precious metal distribution technique results in superior catalyst longevity. ADCATT" 3-Way NSCR Catalyst: Technical Specifications Type >Material ;, Properties Units Specifications = Cell density cpsi 200 300 400 500 6001 700 Wall thickness in. .002 .002 .001/.002 .001/.002 .001/.002 .001/.002 Geometric surface area in'/in' 76.24 97.70 115.10 124.31 145.32 165.55 Maximum temperature °F 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 Metal Coef.of thermal expansion x10 bin/in/°F 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 Height in 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 Blocks Width in 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 Range of Depth* in 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 dimensions Round Diameter in 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 Honeycomb i Depth* in 1-6 1-6 ' 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 Monolith Wall thickness in .0105 .0080 .0070 n/a n/a n/a Geometric surface area in'/in' 48.2 59.7 68.8 n/a n/a n/a Maximum temperature T 1,600 1,600 1,600 n/a n/a n/a Coef.of thermal expansion x10 i0in/in/°F 3.91 3.91 3.91 n/a n/a n/a Ceramic Height in 6-24 6-24 6-24 n/a n/a n/a Blocks Width in 6-24 6-24 6-24 n/a n/a n/a Range of Depth* in 1-15 1-15 1-15 n/a n/a n/a dimensions Diameter in 1-6 1-6 1-6 n/a n/a n/a Round Depth* in 1-15 1-15 1-15 n/a I n/a I n/a Listed numbers are nominal values.Goal Line can manufacture catalyst modules in any size or shape. 'For greater depths,multiple units may be stacked to obtain desired dimensions. Catalyst Substrate Pressure Drop Comparison Substrate Geometric Surface Area (GSA)Comparison �- CERAMIC SUBSTRATE f6Q - >. $ 14tjAY �.. 120 != 00 j ry 54 i >1 METAL SUBSTRATE v 0 4U o +Ceramic GSA �. 20 +Metal GSA m ©`� 300 600 - 9f ? 1200 1500 1$00 Q 200 400t)tl $O0 I dell` C SI z^c =t ..t.�enS1tY ADCATTM 3-Way NSCR Catalyst Performance Inquiries: Send us specifications, drawings or gas stream data and we will rovide you with a custom-tailored solution to our I OPERATING �_ p y WINDOW specific application. Goal Line also provides analytical and #aa technical services to assist in determining your current emissions and catalyst performance. es7 Goal Line is a proven leader in the catalytic control of NOx, w 80 ; SOx, CO, VOCs, and ozone for manufacturing and industrial c applications as well as for the power generation industry. SY Goal Line Environmental Technologies, LLC 11141 Outlet Drive &o NoX Knoxville, TN 37932 Phone: (888)777-GLET(4538) 50 Fax: (865) 671-4047 3000 5500 4000 45 5000 R 55001 6000 Intet c (ppm} www.glet.com C_=®.AI_ I-II�� ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES Catalytic solutions for clean air 1 ADCATCatalystTMVOC w Goal Line's proprietary high activity catalyst delivers maximum VOC destruction with minimum f i catalyst volumes to exceed current and future U.S. EPA requirements. x ADCAT VOC combines low pressure drop with low oxidation temperatures to reduce operating costs. Yt 5411il - _.. son man 0 am N■ Goal Line provides quick delivery of any metal "� ' "" X ' nn tr:JI = Y catalyst module geometry with cell densities of 25 to 700 cells per square inch. Ceramic blocks and ceramic cemented assemblies can also be supplied. Goal Line also offers catalyst services that include washing/refurbishing, non-destructive performance testing and precious metal recovery. �a I s , ADCATTM VOC Catalyst: Technical Specifications Type Material ;! Properties Units Specifications Cell density cpsi 200 300 400 500 6001 700 Wall thickness in. .002 .002 .001/.002 .001/.002 .001/.002 .001/.002 Geometric surface area in2/in' 76.24 97.70 115.10 124.31 145.32 165.55 Maximum temperature OF 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 Metal Coef.of thermal expansion x105in/in/'F 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 Height in 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 Blocks Width in 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 Range of Depth* in 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 dimensions Diameter in 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 Honeycomb Round Depth* in 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 Monolith Wall thickness in .0105 .0080 .0070 n/a n/a n/a Geometric surface area W/in' 48.2 59.7 68.8 n/a n/a n/a Maximum temperature OF 1,600 1,600 1,600 n/a n/a n/a Coef.of thermal expansion x10-"in/in/°F 3.91 3.91 3.91 n/a n/a n/a Ceramic Height in 6-24 6-24 6-24 n/a n/a n/a Blocks Width in 6-24 6-24 6-24 n/a n/a n/a Range of Depth* in 1-15 1-15 1-15 n/a n/a n/a dimensions Diameter in 1-6 1-6 1-6 n/a n/a n/a Round Depth* in 11-15 1-15 1 15 n/a I n/a I n/a i Listed numbers are nominal values.Goal Line can manufacture catalyst modules in any size or shape. Typ@! ---Material .� _$IZe `For greater depths,multiple units may be stacked to obtain desired dimensions. Spherical Beads Alumina Diameter: 1/8 to 1/4 in. Catalyst Substrate Pressure Drop Comparison Substrate Geometric Surface Area (GSA) Comparison r _ p CERAMIC SUBSTRATE N � t' a 420 OR IncMR ' 6 7, t 10.0 RE 0 is 4 Al ° 60 r METAL SUBSTRATE m -4-Ceramic GSA Dt m } 2 s -e-Metal GSA on- d tl . 300 600900 �1200 i500 f800 o a '7 2oQ r 40t1 500 � $0¢ iI } i ADCATTM VOC Catalyst Performance Inquiries: i Send us specifications, drawings or gas stream data and we will provide you with a custom-tailored solution to your ; sD specific application. Goal Line also provides analytical and $p technical services to assist in determining your current o = emissions and catalyst performance. ea Goal Line is a proven leader in the catalytic control of NOx, gyp: SOx, CO, VOCs, and ozone for manufacturing and industrial AY 40- applications as well as for the power generation industry. > " 3Q Goal Line Environmental Technologies, LLC zm 20,' 11141 Outlet Drive a - Knoxville,TN 37932 Phone: (888) 777-GLET(4538) 'p Fax: (865) 671-4047 0 100 200 300 �IQQ 500_ 6E1E� 700 80U f 1000 F . s Tem fattlrg www.glet.com MC:14�Ls, L_1r%%� ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES Catalytic solutions for clean air ADCATTM Co Catalyst �= Goal Line's oxidation catalyst offers high conversion at high flow rates with reduced catalyst volume, minimizing capital costs. High surface area metal substrate up to 700 cpsi results in a thinner catalyst layer and reduced pressure drop. � y + Goal Line's metal catalyst is backed with a three-year warranty and has an anticipated Fife of seven to ten years. The longevity allows for greater flexibility to meet increasingly stringent regulations. A wide operating temperature range (200- 1200°F) allows for easy integration of our CO catalyst into new or retrofit applications. . 0 ADCATTM CO Catalyst: Technical Specifications Type Mafertah' Properties :Units 'Spectffcations - — - _ . Cell density cpsi A76.24 300 400 500 600 700 Wall thickness in. .002 .001/.002 .001/.002 .001/.002 .001/.002 Geometric surface area inz/in' 97.70 115.10 124.31 145.32 165.55 Maximum temperature °F 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 Coef.of thermal expansion x10'in/in/°F . . 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 5.9-8.0 Metal Height in 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 Blocks Width in 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-56 Range of Depth* in 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 dimensions Diameter in 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 0.5-56 Honeycomb Round Depth* in 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 Monolith Wall thickness in .0105 .0080 .0070 n/a n/a n/a Geometric surface area in'/in' 48.2 59.7 68.8 n/a n/a n/a Maximum temperature OF 1,6 00 1,600 1,600 n/a n/a n/a Coef.of thermal expansion x10-' in/in/°F 3.91 1 3.91 3.91 n/a n/a n/a Ceramic Height in 6-24 6-24 6-24 n/a n/a n/a Blocks Width in 6-24 6-24 6-24 n/a n/a n/a Range of Depth* in 1-15 1-15 1-15 n/a n/a n/a dimensions Diameter in 1-6 1-6 1-6 n/a n/a n/a Round Depth* in 1-15 1-15 1-15 n/a n/a n/a Listed numbers are nominal values.Goal Line can manufacture catalyst modules in any size or shape. `For greater depths,multiple units may be stacked to obtain desired dimensions. Catalyst Substrate Pressure Drop Comparison Substrate Geometric Surface Area(GSA)Comparison pg Ia CERAMIC SUBSTRATENO MW - s € _ _ Vag 0 aMR NO " u r a INT 1 ~ �: k }G � ,� as �. METAL SUBSTRATE - AN 4 +Ceramic GSA x -&-Metal GSA 20Q= �50Q $OEi' NOefoct ADCATTM CO Catalyst Performance Inquiries: Send us specifications, drawings or gas stream data and we s m will provide you with a custom-tailored solution to your specific application. Goal Line also provides analytical and a technical services to assist in determining your current emissions and catalyst performance. Goal Line is a proven leader in the catalytic control of NOx, SOx, CO, VOCs, and ozone for manufacturing and industrial AM applications as well as for the power generation industry. Goal Line Environmental Technologies, LLC 11141 Outlet Drive Knoxville, TN 37932 Phone: (888) 777-GLET(4538) Fax: (865) 671-4047 �r��erttperatu[e � . 0. _= www.glet.com ® ® eVqoc`��"Contrbl , y i Catalytic solutions for clean air TM SCONOx 1CwN Goal Line's SCONOx IC-N reduces up to 95% of NOx, CO, and VOCs emitted from lean burn natural as IC engines. SCONOx IC-N enables .... . .. ti,� .�. •-�.........• .-,. • engines to operate at higher efficiency, highera '' �; �:' power output, and lower cost than competing IR technologies. q• o?;• .,.ti•:;.tip,`,� ••.'.,; SCONOx IC-N utilizes a multi-chamber design based on Goal Line's gas turbine operational experience and NSCR catalytic designs. a As a result of itsmodular compact design and limited ancillary equipment, SCONOx IC-N is simple to operate and install. y r SCONOx IC-N provides the ability to meet existing and future emission standards for any lean burn, two-stroke or four-stroke engine. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES - How SCONOx IC-N Works: - -- - e--- a m- The SCONOx IC-N system utilizes patented catalysts for the removal of NOx, r1 ,' z CO, and VOC. The process uses no � hazardous materials. Utilities required to ox_- operate the system include natural gas and SpoN_ electricity. The multiple reactor design allows continuous operation with one ,_ chamber in the normal operating mode of oxidation/absorption while the other so>< chambers are in regeneration. SCONOx IC-N NOx Destruction Efficiency 120 5: c SCONOx IC-N Configuration „0 100 { The SCONOx IC-N system is designed to minimize 80- equipment footprint and maximize flexibility. The n 70- compact modular design with limited ancillary 60 ` equipment provides multiple options to meet your Z s0 specific requirements. The system is provided as a { 40 complete skid that ispre-piped, re-wired and p p 30 factory tested. 20 10 012 11 10 9 +8 7 g 5.:, 4, 3 2 `7 0 NOx Outlet(ppm) SCONOx IC-N Operational Benefits: • Increased fuel savings over rich burn,natural gas Inquiries: engines Send us specifications, drawings or exhaust stream Flexibility to tune engine for maximum data and we will provide you with a custom-tailored performance solution for your specific application. Goal Line also provides analytical and technical services to assist in • Extended engine life due to cool&combustion, .` determining your current emissions and control temperatures compared to rich burn settings requirements. Control of multiple air pollutants with a single. Goal Line is a proven leader in the catalytic control of catalyst NOx, SOx, CO, VOCs, and ozone for power Significantly reduced emissions on cold starts generation and natural gas compression, as well as for manufacturing and other industrial applications. Goal Line Environmental Technologies, LLC _z 11141 Outlet Drive Knoxville, TN 37932 For Rich Burn I C EngFnes Phone: (888) 777-4538 Goal Lane offers ADCATT"' 3 Way Fax: (865) 671-4047 NSCR Catalyst - www.glet.com • V.00 ,-6hd.��".,CO • • `L s 4 `1. Catalytic solutions for clean air r f TM � SCO N OX 1 B Goal Line's SCONOx IB offers low-cost emission control for industrial boilers that reduces NOx, CO and VOCs by 90%. F a Designed for new or retrofit installations, ?° SCONOx IB: • Costs less than competing technologies t • Occupies a small equipment footprint F • Operates over a wide temperature range of 300OF to 700OF s • Provides regulatory certainty SCONOx IB is a simple catalyst system that does not use harmful reagents such as ammonia or ozone. SCONOx IB does not produce by-products nor require a Low NOx burner. Destruction efficiencies greater than 90 /o canT f be achieved depending on your specific # application requirements. Pp CB EM4092k ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES How SCONOx IB Works: The SCONOx IB system utilizes a single c catalyst for the removal of NOx, CO, and VOC. Rea - �""" r r The process uses no hazardous materials. The gt �« ox data Y only utilities required to operate the system are f natural gas, steam, and electricity. The dual reactor design allows one chamber to be in the normal operating mode of oxidation/absorption k< rata►Yst scoptOX while the other chamber is regenerating. MAMMWM,NA SCONOx IB System Configuration 1- p ' The SCONOx IB system is designed to minimize footprint and maximize flexibility. The compact lz modular design with limited ancillary equipment � � . = provides multiple options to meet your specific Up requirements. The system is provided as a complete skid that is pre-piped, pre-wired and factory tested. SCONOx IB NOx Destruction Efficiency 120 a. P� 100 14 MR Inquiries: Send us specifications,drawings or exhaust stream 4- data and we will provide you with a custom-tailored CL solution to your specific boiler application. Goal Line „60 r r also provides analytical and technical services to x =, assist in determining your current emissions and ' Z 'naP ao control requirements. x . 20 Goal Line is a proven leader in the catalytic control = of NOx, SOx, CO, VOCs, and ozone for ° _ manufacturingand industrial applications as well as 012 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 ' 0 PP NOx Outlet(ppm) for the power generation industry. Goal Line Environmental Technologies, LLC 11141 Outlet Drive SCONOx IB is only available through Goal Line or Knoxville,TN 37932 its authorized licensees and distributors. Phone: (888) 777-4538 Fax: (865) 671-4047 www.glet.com 'Appeal - AES Huntington Beach i rogen Oxi e missions �m Reduction Equipment ( Negative Declaration No. 00-09 Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 March 5, 2001 µ. 3 UNITS 1 S 2:STACK IN FOREGROUND,FACING WEST AES HUNTINGTON BEACH *�� AES Southland,LLC SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION(SCR) ms INSTALLATION PROJECT 1 Project Description ➢ AE Huntington Beach ➢ Install Selective Catalytic Reduction Sy tem (SCR) ® Units 1 and 2 ➢ educe nitrogen oxide emissions ➢Gienerate ammonia via urea to ammonia process ➢ Co tinued from 02/20/01 at applicant's request Separate/Related Project ➢ Retool Units 3 and 4 ➢ Application for Certification to CEC ➢ Cit is commenting agency and now int rvenor ➢ SCR proposed on Units 3 and 4 ➢ CE Workshop March 15 and Evi entiary Hearing March 16 2 Planning Commission December 12, 2000 ➢ Discussion ➢Ll ea and ammonia ➢P Ilution emissions ➢C mmunity safety ➢L ndscaping )o-Nc Wand Street improvements )O-Pt blic Notification procedures ➢ Plar ning Commission approved AE ' request p ---]December , ➢ Issues of Concern ➢A mmonia health risks ➢D sign safety features; staff training ➢A mmonia reactor — vapor cloud plume modeling ➢S ill leak procedural plan ➢S ismic safety 3 [_An-a ysis an ecommen ation ➢ Land Use Compatibility ➢ Reduce nitrogen oxide emissions ➢General Industrial Zoning ➢ Aesthetics ➢O,ferall, negligible impact ➢Ui ban Design Guidelines ➢In ensify landscaping, widen Newland.Street ➢Alproved by DRB ➢ Corr munity Safety and Benefits ➢ Reduce nitrogen oxide ➢S ggested conditions of approval END OF PRESENTATION 4 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-04 Council/Agency Meeting Held: OZ-- U--01 Deferred ontinued t : 03— 05— 0) ❑Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied y CI 's Signature Council Meeting Date: February 20, 2001 Department ID Number: PL01-04 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - REQUEST FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY OUNCIL MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, City Administrator VS PREPARED BY: HOWARD ZELEFSKY, Director of Planning G MICHAEL P. DOLDER, Fire Chief/Information Systems Director SUBJECT: APPROVE AES POWER GENERATING STATION'S NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS REDUCTION EQUIPMENT Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Council Member Ralph Bauer, of the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49, Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15, and Negative Declaration No. 00-09. This application represents a request by AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station to install nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment in the boilers at Units 1 and 2. This equipment is called Selective Catalytic Reduction system or SCR. The Planning Commission approved the project and is recommending approval because the SCR is necessary to reduce pollution emissions at the power plant in accordance with regulations and standards set by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Staff recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission and is recommending the City Council approve the request with modifications to the conditions of approval (Recommended Action) because the Fire Department recommends additional measures to assure protection of the Huntington Beach community from all risks associated with the use of ammonia. Council Member Bauer appealed the project because he has concerns regarding community safety and the use of ammonia, a hazardous material generated within the emission reduction equipment. The applicant is requesting approval because AES is mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District to reduce current nitrogen oxide emissions by 90%. PL01-04 -2- 02/14/01 5:06 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PI01-04 Funding Source: Not applicable. Recommended Action: PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: 1. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 00-09 with findings (ATTACHMENT NO. 1)", and 2. "Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 with findings and modified conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO. 1)." Planning Commission Action on December 12, 2000: THE MOTION MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY KERINS, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49, AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL (ATTACHMENT NO. 1 AS MODIFIED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT) CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LIVENGOOD, KERINS, SPEAKER, SHOMAKER, MANDIC, CHAPMAN, AND BIDDLE NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE MOTION PASSED Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1. "Deny Negative Declaration No. 00-09, Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49, and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 with findings." 2. "Continue Negative Declaration No. 00-09, Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49, and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 and direct staff accordingly." PL01-04 -3- 02/14/01 4:33 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-04 Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Mr. Han Tan, AES Huntington Beach, LLC, 21730 Newland Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Location: 21730 Newland Street (Northeast of Newland and Pacific Coast Highway) Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 represents a request to install a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system at AES Huntington Beach Generating Station's Units 1 and 2 pursuant to Section 212.04, IL and IG Districts: Land Use Controls, Industrial Uses of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO). SCR will be used to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions as part of AES' plan to meet the declining facility-wide NOx emission allocation limits required by South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM) Program. The proposed project consists of the installation of the following components: • Two SCR Reactor Units: The reactor units will be located in each of the two boiler exhaust ducts between the economizer and air heaters of Units One and Two. The units include the installation of carbon steel assemblies comprised of four reactors, 26 feet long by 19 feet wide by 9 feet high. • Control Equipment: The SCR control equipment will be incorporated into the existing plant distribution control system with new interface hardware. • Ammonia Source Component: The project uses ammonia as the principal NOx reducing agent. Although the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 00-09 analyzed generation of ammonia by two different methods, AES has determined that the Preferred Approach will be utilized. A description of the Preferred Approach follows and is now called the Proposed Approach. The Alternative Approach, which proposed to transport and store a 19 percent aqueous ammonia (ammonia hydroxide) solution is no longer proposed as part of the project. ❑ The Proposed Approach is to generate ammonia onsite using a Urea to Ammonia (U2A) generation process. The U2A system will require installation of a 20 ft. long by 8 ft. wide conversion skid and a 4 ft. long by 5 ft. wide pump skid and will utilize the existing on-site urea storage tanks. The solid urea will be transported to the site every five days during the peak summer months. Additional details regarding the U2A process can be found in Negative Declaration No. 00-09 (Attachment No. 2). Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 pursuant Chapter 221 of the ZSO is requested for a project within the coastal zone pursuant to Section 245.06 of the ZSO. PL01-04 -4- 02/14/01 4:33 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-04 All new equipment is proposed within the existing fenceline of the Huntington Beach Generating Station. The SCR Reactor Units will be encased in the existing boiler duct work and would not be visible off-site. All other new components will be installed close to the boiler structure and would also not be visible off-site. Prior to the appeal filed by Council Member Bauer, the construction of the project was anticipated to occur between January and April of 2001. An outage, or shut down, of the Generation Station was scheduled to begin February 14, 2001. If approved by the City Council, construction of the project will commence as soon as possible. During a scheduled outage, electrical power will continue to be provided to the Huntington Beach community because power is supplied through a grid system for all of California. AES has scheduled the shut down with the California Independent System Operator (CALISO), an organization responsible for ensuring available energy throughout the system. CALISO monitors and staggers routine outtages for general maintenance or installation of new equipment so that sufficient power continues to be available to all users within the grid area. The SCR system is scheduled to be on-line in May of 2001. The construction of the proposed project includes a crew of approximately 30 temporary tradesmen. Construction equipment includes a boom truck, air tugger, eight pack welding machine, and a crane. B. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The Planning Commission reviewed the SCR request at a public hearing on December 12, 2000. The Planning Commission discussed the reasons for installing the SCR as well as the safety aspects of converting urea to ammonia in the Urea to Ammonia (U2A) process. Approximately four people spoke regarding the project; two people representing AES, described the project and requested approval of the SCR equipment. Another speaker expressed concern about the lack of expanded notification for the public hearing. In response, staff significantly expanded the notification radius for the City Council appeal hearing on February 20, 2001. Not only was the property ownership radius expanded but residents and occupants of the adjacent mobilehome park and single family homes were also notified. After discussion regarding use of urea and ammonia, risk of upset, pollution emissions, community safety, landscaping improvements, Newland Street improvements, temporary construction area, pilot testing of the U2A process, urea delivery truck trips, seismic safety standards, urea containment areas, public notification procedures, and detailed community safety issues, the Planning Commission approved AES' request based on the suggested conditions of approval and information provided by staff. C. APPEAL: Council Member Ralph Bauer appealed this project so that more information about the use of ammonia within the SCR equipment could be discussed and shared with all the City Council members (Attachment No. 3). Each of the reasons for Council Member Bauer's appeal is repeated and answered in the Analysis and Recommendation section below. PL01-04 -5- 02/14/01 4:33 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PI01-04 D. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: There are three primary issues for the City Council to consider when analyzing the proposed SCR project: 1) land use compatibility, 2) aesthetics, and 3) community safety and benefits. Land Use Compatibility The proposed installation of SCR equipment is a small project in comparison to the overall power generating facility. The nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment and the associated urea to ammonia process will be compatible with the existing operations at the power plant. The actual mechanical equipment necessary for the project will either be hidden behind the fenceline or represent a minor change in the exterior appearance in the boiler duct work of Units 1 and 2. In terms of land use compatibility with the surrounding properties, the existing power generating station and the proposed SCR equipment are both compatible with the General Industrial zoning on the property. There is currently a mix of land uses around the plant including mobilehome park, industrial, and open space. The proposed nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment, which will reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from the plant by 90% of the current emissions as required by the SCAQMD, will improve the facility's compatibility with surrounding uses, especially with the amended project description eliminating the transport and storage of aqueous ammonia. Aesthetics The proposed SCR equipment located on the ground within the plant will not be visible from off-site. The new mechanical equipment to be installed within the two boilers of Units 1 and 2 will be visible from outside the facility perimeter. However, the equipment will be constructed within the existing machinery in the boiler units and the aesthetic impact to the overall plant will be negligible. The applicant has supplied before and after photographic renditions of the new SCR mechanical equipment to demonstrate the minute impact on the appearance of the facility (Attachment No. 4). A common theme throughout the City's General Plan, Urban Design Guidelines, Coastal Element, and the requests of the community is the goal of minimizing the visual impact of the facility through the use of intensified landscaping. The City also has separately stated the goal of widening and improving Newland Street between Pacific Coast Highway and Hamilton Avenue. PL01-04 -6- 02/14/01 4:33 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-04 The Newland Street widening project goes beyond the boundaries of the AES facility and the Public Works Department recommends that the entire street section be widened and reconstructed to improve safety, appearance, and drainage issues. AES will ultimately be responsible for constructing half-width street improvements along the Newland Street frontage of the project site. Improvements include dedication for street widening, relocation and reconstruction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and landscaping. The street also needs grading improvements to improve visibility and traffic safety due to a rise in the street elevation. Therefore, staff recommends that AES enter into an agreement with the City to bond and pay for their fair share toward the cost of improving the street adjacent to the plant. That way, the Public Works Department can coordinate with other adjacent property owners up to Hamilton and complete the improvements in one efficient, cost-saving project (See Condition of Approval No. 6.b. and 6.g., Attachment No. 1). The Public Works Department estimates that the total street improvement project is about one year away. The DRB and staff also recommend conditions of approval which require AES to replace dead and dying landscaping, fill in, and intensify the landscaping along the south and easterly property lines of the facility. The irrigation system should also be made completely functional to ensure the long-term viability of the landscaping. As stated above, goals of the General Plan, Urban Design Guidelines, and Draft Coastal Element call for intensified landscaping at the power plant. A letter forwarded to Southern California Edison, the previous property owner, from the City in 1997 (Attachment No. 4 of Attachment No. 6 - December 12, 2000 Planning Commission staff report ), also discussed the City's goals for intensified landscaping to screen the aesthetic impact of the plant. The City's letter stated that additional landscaping would be required along the south and east property lines when the next project was proposed, regardless of the ownership of the property. Therefore, staff recommends a condition of approval requiring intensified landscaping to be provided along the south and east property lines prior to final inspection of the SCR system. Community Safety and Benefits As described in the Project Proposal, above, SCR is intended to reduce the nitrogen oxide emissions from the facility by 90% as mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. This project, with the commitment from AES to utilize the urea to ammonia approach, will benefit the Huntington Beach community by improving air quality issues in our region. With the change from use of aqueous ammonia to a urea to ammonia approach, the risk of upset during transport and storage of ammonia is eliminated. As discussed in the Response to Comments and Errata to Negative Declaration No. 00-09, mitigation measures are no longer necessary to address risks associated with use of aqueous ammonia. The SCAQMD will be the responsible agency for monitoring the SCR equipment and the nitrogen oxide emissions. Monitors within the boiler system test the emissions on a continual basis and ensure compliance with AQMD standards. PL01-04 -7- 02/14/01 4:33 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-04 The City of Huntington Beach Fire Department is responsible for reviewing and approving any mandated Risk Management Plan and California Accidental Release Prevention Program. These two plans entail emergency response plans and are necessary to address and plan for accidental release of hazardous materials. However, with the elimination of aqueous ammonia and implementation of the Urea to Ammonia process, an amended emergency response plan may not be necessary. The suggested conditions of approval state that the project shall comply with the Cal-ARP program for Hazardous Materials reporting so that the Fire Department can determine the levels of compliance necessary (See Condition of Approval No. 6. a) 6), Attachment No. 1). Appeal As stated above an appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the project was filed in December, 2000 by City Council Member Ralph Bauer. Each of Council Member Bauer's appeal issues is repeated below followed by a response from the Fire Department. Appeal Reason No. 1 The City Council requires additional information regarding health risks associated with ammonia gas and liquid, including information pertaining to flammability, threshold valves, and time weighted averages with exposure limits. Additional information should be obtained regarding alternative pollution mitigation options. Staff Response No. 1 The delivered product is urea in the form of dry prills or pellets. It is pneumatically delivered from a truck into a holding tank where it is dissolved as a 40-50% urea/water solution. It is inert until dissolved and heated in a separate pressure tank above 240 degrees Fahrenheit at which point ammonia gas production begins. Urea 40-50% solution is toxic to the environment when in solution at 40-50%. Urea solution has no flammability (flash point zero), will not polymerize, and is considered stable. There are no Prop. 65 requirements listed, no listed threshold limit values (TLV), personal exposure limits (PEL), or RELS as determined by the American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), the Occupational Safety & Heath Administration (OSHA), and the National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) respectively. However, in order to protect the environment in case of spill, the Fire Department recommends the following condition of approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following information and/or plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: ■ AES must provide on-site containment and an approved spill mitigation and disposal plan (See Condition of Approval No. 4.b. Attachment No. 1). PL01-04 -8- 02/14/01 4:33 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-04 Ammonia gas is a corrosive and flammable gas (flash point 1203 degrees F). It is an irritant and has a human time weighted average exposure (TWA-8 hour) of 25 parts per million (PPM) and a short-term exposure limit (STEL-15_minute) of 35 PPM as published by ACGIH and NIOSH. OSHA only lists a TWA of 50 PPM. Therefore, the Fire Department recommends that the system be designed so that no ammonia gas travels off-site. To that end, the Fire Department recommends the following condition of approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following information and/or plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: ■ The Urea to Ammonia system shall be designed so that no ammonia gas travels off- site. If this cannot be attained, an approved mitigating emergency containment and fixed fire protection systems shall be required (See Condition of Approval No. 4.b. Attachment No. 1). Appeal Reason No. 2 The pollution reduction proposal needs to be reviewed for adequate design safety features, including education of staff, training, safety reviews of units, test readiness, etc. Staff Response No. 2 On Friday, February 9, 2001 the Fire Department and AES conducted a hazards & operability study (HAZOPS) of the entire urea to ammonia process as proposed by AES. The HAZOPS was conducted by a professional company, URS, and all "What-If' issues regarding high or low flow and pressure, outside impacts, system failures, and seismic effects were examined. The HAZOPS also reviewed the process for extreme external influences such as earthquake, flood/tsunami, power plant fire and exposure, vehicle crash, sabotage and vandalism. As a result of the HAZOPS study, the Fire Department recommends that the City Council include the following conditions of approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following information and/or plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: ■ Hazards and Operability Study of the entire urea to ammonia process and appropriate mitigation measures ■ Offsite ammonia product plume modeling (worst case), end point at 25 parts per million ■ Seismic Zone 4 construction ■ Spill control and secondary containment ■ Static electricity control ■ Installation of protective crash posts PL01-04 -9- 02/14/01 4:33 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-04 ■ Fixed water spray plume protection for ammonia gas containment (pending plume model results) ■ All hot equipment, pipes, etc. to be insulated ■ Publish and submit an approved Emergency Response Plan and employee training program ■ Meet all general requirements of Huntington Beach Fire Code Section 8001 regarding notification and signage. ■ Redundant alarms, notification devices, and manual override systems ■ Classified electrical, Class I, Division 2 unless proven unnecessary by a licensed electrical engineer's review of a certified process engineer's statement that no flammable atmosphere could be present. ■ Certification from a registered fire protection engineer stating no possibility of explosive dust production from the urea unloading process ■ All tanks, valves, fittings, pipe, etc. are appropriate for the specified products as determined by an appropriate licensed mechanical engineer. Certification to include a list of all codes and sections for appropriate documentation (See Condition of Approval No. 4.b. Attachment No. 1). Appeal Reason No. 3 Council has not been apprised regarding the hazards associated with an ammonia reactor failure including vapor cloud plume modeling. Staff Response No. 3 AES is in the process of providing the Fire Department with three worst-case modeling scenarios. However, it has been determined that the ammonia production is limited and stops once pressure and/or temperature has been lost. Worst-case scenarios include: ■ The reactor failure to reflect the worst-case catastrophic release. ■ The most creditable scenario, a pipe or valve failure, such as a hole in the pipe downstream of the reactor. ■ A release from the Urea Solution tank vent during an emergency gas relief from the reactor. The estimated worst-case release amount will be included in the published Hazardous/Operability Study conducted with AES and the Fire Department on February 9, 2001. Based upon that SCR review and evaluation process, the Fire Department will not permit any offsite ammonia gas. Therefore, the Fire Department recommends that the system be designed so that no ammonia gas travels off-site. To that end, the Fire Department recommends the following condition of approval: PL01-04 -10- 02/14/01 4:33 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-04 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following information and/or plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: ■ The Urea to Ammonia system shall be designed so that no ammonia gas travels off- site. If this cannot be attained, an approved mitigating emergency containment and fixed fire protection systems shall be required. ■ Onsite ammonia gas release shall not exceed 25 parts per million or odor smell only. ■ If the modeling hazard footprint extends beyond the AES property lines, the Fire Department will require mitigation through proper code compliance and systems such as water spray or fixed monitors to absorb any release (See Condition of Approval No. 4.b. Attachment No. 1). Appeal Reason No. 4 It should be determined if development of a spill/leak procedural plan for neighborhood evacuation is required. Staff Response No. 4 An evacuation plan for the neighborhood is not required because the upset ammonia vapors will be controlled onsite or mitigated by fixed Fire Protection Systems. AES will provide spill control and secondary containment in compliance with the Fire Code for all equipment, tanks, piping, truck unloading, and for the water spray system. Such secondary containment will have impermeable surfaces and will be designed to prevent any intrusion into areas where fish, etc, could be destroyed by ammonia solution. Appeal Reason No. 5 It should be determined if the current safety controls in place are adequate in the event of a major earthquake. Staff Response No. 5 The SCR system is required to be designed to the proper seismic criteria for Zone 4 (the most restrictive seismic conditions). Plans and calculations shall be submitted to the City's Building and Safety Department (See Condition of Approval No. 4.b. Attachment No. 1). PL01-04 -11- 02/14/01 4:33 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-04 Appeal Reason No. 6 By virtue of this appeal, the Council must approve the Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Reduction System at the Huntington Beach Power Generator Station. Staff Response No. 6 The processing of the appeal and this public hearing serves as the City Council's opportunity to review, act on, and condition Negative Declaration No. 00-09, Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49, and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 for the proposed installation of the SCR equipment. F. SUMMARY Staff recommends approval of AES Huntington .Beach's request to install nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment within Units 1 and 2 at the power generation facility based on the following: - SCAQMD mandates reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions from AES power generation facility. - Additional equipment has negligible impact on aesthetics of plant. - Ammonia will be generated on an as needed basis eliminating hazards associated with transport and storage of ammonia. - Complies with General Plan goals and objectives regarding intensification of landscaping. - Complies with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Development Standards. - Conditions of approval regarding bonding for future dedication and improvements for Newland Street. - Any potential adverse environmental impacts associated with SCR equipment have been mitigated through conditions of approval. Environmental Status: Staff performed an environmental assessment and determined that no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project that could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance with proper design and engineering. Subsequently, Negative Declaration No. 00-09 (Attachment No. 2) was prepared pursuant to Section 240.04 of the HBZSO and the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA). PL01-04 -12- 02/14/01 4:33 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL01-04 Although the initial study analyzed two methods for generating ammonia, a necessary component of the SCR system, the applicant has since revised the project description so that the Preferred Approach, which generates ammonia from urea on-site and on an as needed basis, is the sole proposed method. Therefore, the Alternative Approach, which proposed to transport and store a 19% aqueous ammonia (ammonia hydroxide) solution is no longer part of the proposed project. Consequently, mitigation measures necessary to protect the community from the accidental risk of ammonia spill in the Alternative Approach, are no longer necessary and have been removed. An Errata to the Draft Negative Declaration has been prepared and is attached (Attachment No. 2). The Planning Department advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 00-09 for thirty (30) days commencing on November 2, 2000 and ending on December 1, 2000. Notification of the comment period was published in the Independent Newspaper, was posted at the County of Orange, and a copy of the Initial Study was directly mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the site as well as interested parties such as representatives from the Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association and Huntington Beach Coastal Communities Association. The Draft Negative Declaration was also sent to the State Clearinghouse where the document was forwarded to numerous agencies for review. Comments were received from AES Huntington Beach, LLC., Huntington Beach Environmental Board, Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association, Huntington Beach Coastal Communities Association, Mr. Richard Loy, the County of Orange Planning and Development Services Department, and the Department of Toxic Substances Control. Responses and Errata have been included with the attached Negative Declaration. Environmental Board Comments: The Environmental Board was notified of the Negative Declaration. On December 6, 2000, the Environmental Board provided a letter (Attachment No. 2) addressing several issues including: • Identify transit route and vehicles to be used for transportation of aqueous ammonia • Risk Management Plan and California Accidental Release Program should address employment receptors and a fence line analysis in addition to residential receptors. • Strongly recommend Urea to Ammonia (Preferred Approach) Again, a response and errata have been prepared (Attachment No. 2). It should be noted that AES' confirmation of the Urea to Ammonia Process sufficiently addresses the three comments by the Environmental Board by eliminating the use, transport, and storage of the 19% aqueous ammonia. PL01-04 -13- 02/14/01 4:33 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PI01-04 Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No.00-15, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 00-09. Planning Commission and Staff, in its initial study of the project, is recommending that the negative declaration be approved with findings. Attachment(s): City Clerk's Page Number No. Description 1. Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval 2. Negative Declaration No. 00-09 (Includes Environmental Checklist, Response to Comments, Errata to the Negative Declaration, and Comment Letters from AES Huntington Beach, LLC., Huntington Beach Environmental Board, Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association, Huntington Beach Coastal Communities Association, Mr. Richard Loy, the County of Orange Planning and Development Services Department, and the Department of Toxic Substances Control) 3. Appeal letter from Council Member Ralph Bauer dated December 19, 2000 4. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations dated September 29, 2000 5. Letter from Ed Blackford, AES, dated January 17, 2001 6. Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 12, 2000 na PL01-04 -14- 02/14/01 4:33 PM w / r / , ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/ COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMINT NO. 00-15 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09: 1. The Negative Declaration No. 00-09 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty (30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15. 2. The proposed project,method of ammonia generation, and standard conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Planning Commission that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 will have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 for the establishment,maintenance and operation of the Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR) system at AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The SCR system is proposed in order to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from the power plant as mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The ammonia necessary for reduction of nitrogen oxide emissions will be generated via a Urea to Ammonia process, which allows ammonia to be generated on an as needed basis. Therefore, the proposed project does not include any transport or storage of ammonia. Based upon the conditions imposed and the proposed project itself,the community will benefit from reduced nitrogen oxide emissions. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because nitrogen oxide emissions from the power generating facility will be reduced, dead and dying landscaping will be replaced, irrigation systems will be made 100% operational, and landscaping along the south and east perimeter will be intensified. This project is also compatible with surrounding uses because installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility. The equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. PLOT-04att 1 02/14/01 4:55 PM 3. The proposed Selective Catalytic Reduction at AES Huntington Beach will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed project complies with all development standards of the General Industrial zoning district. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Public on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: A. Land Use Element Policy L U 2.1.1: Plan and construct public infrastructure and service improvements as demand necessitates to support the land uses specified in the Land Use Plan(as defined in the Circulation and Public Utilities and Services Elements of the General Plan). Utilities Element Goal U 5: Maintain and expand service provision(of gas supply,telecommunication, and electricity)to City of Huntington Beach residents and business. Policy U 5.1.1: Continue to work with service providers to maintain current levels of service and facilitate improved levels of service. Policy U 5.1.4: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The existing AES power generating facility is necessary to provide power to Huntington Beach residents and business owners in addition to the power services provided for the entire Southern California power grid. The new SCR system will benefit residents, property owners, and the Huntington Beach community by reducing nitrogen oxide emissions from the plant as mandated by the SCAQMD. Installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility because the equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. C. Urban Design Element Policy UD 2.2.1: Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. Policies - UD 1.4.1: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. PLO 1-04att 2 02/14/01 4:55 PM The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. D. Draft Coastal Element Draft Policy 9a: Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas that does not significantly degrade habitat values and which is compatible with the continuance of the habitat. Recognizing the greater than local significance of the City's energy resources, Coastal Element policy allows for the continuation, and in some cases expansion, of these facilities while ensuring the community's public health and safety, environmental protection and minimization of negative aesthetic impacts to the maximum extent feasible. The suggested conditions of approval include requirements for AES to improve the quality of existing landscaping around the southern and eastern property lines while also making the irrigation system 100% operational. The conditions also include language requiring AES to enter into an agreement with the City with a fair share proportionate bond to cover the cost of landscaping and street improvements for Newland Street. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 for the development project, as proposed or as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The project includes conditions to replace dead and dying landscaping, to make irrigation systems 100% operational, and to intensify landscaping along the south and east perimeter of the power plant. The project complies with the Draft Coastal Element, currently under review by the Planning Commission,which states that landscaping should be utilized to buffer the appearance of existing utility operations. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The SCR system complies with all aspects of the Coastal Zone overlay and the General Industrial zoning district. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. All infrastructure necessary for the SCR system is either currently available to AES, the property owner and applicant, or AES will be installing the necessary improvements for the SCR equipment. 4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The existing AES power generating facility nor the proposed SCR system do not conflict with either public access or public recreation to coastal amenities. PLO T-04att 3 02/14/01 4:55 PM CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 29, 2000 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to clearing and grubbing,the following shall be completed: a. Existing mature trees that are to be removed must be replaced at a 2-for-1 ratio with a 36- inch box tree or palm equivalent. Applicant shall provide a consulting arborist report on all the existing trees. Said report shall quantify, identify, size, and analyze the health of the existing trees. The report shall also recommend how the existing trees that are to remain(if any) shall be protected and how far construction/grading shall be kept from the trunk. b. Any work within the public right-of-way will require encroachment permits and traffic control plans prepared to City standards. 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the index. b. The Design Review Board and Planning Department shall review and approve plans for intensified landscaping around south and east property lines as required in Condition of Approval No. 6. f. c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) 4. Prior to issuance of building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Submit 8 inch by 10 inch colored photographs of all colored renderings and elevations to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file. b. The following information and/or plans demonstrating compliance with the following issue areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Chief: 1. Hazards and Operability Study (HAZOPS) for the entire urea to ammonia process and appropriate mitigation measures. (FD) 2. AES must demonstrate on-site containment and an approved spill mitigation and disposal plan. (FD) 3. The Urea to Ammonia system shall be designed so that no ammonia gas travels off-site. If the modeling hazard footprint extends beyond the AES property lines, the Fire Department will require mitigation through proper code compliance and systems such as water spray or fixed monitors to absorb any release. (FD) PLO 1-04att. 4 02/14/01 4:55 PM 4. On site ammonia gas release shall not exceed 25 parts per million or odor smell only. (FD) 5. Provide Seismic Zone 4 construction. (FD) 6. Provide spill control and secondary containment to include equipment, tanks,piping, truck unloading and fixed fire protection system. Secondary containment shall have impermeable surfaces and will be designed to prevent any intrusion into areas where fish, etc. would be destroyed by ammonia solution. (FD) 7. Provide static electricity control. (FD) 8. Provide installation of protective crash posts. (FD) 9. Provide fixed water spray plume protection for ammonia gas containment(pending plume model results). (FD) 10. All hot equipment,pipes, etc. to be insulated. (FD) 11. Publish and submit an approved Emergency Response Plan and employee training program. (FD) 12. Meet all general requirements of Huntington Beach Fire Code Section 8001 regarding notification and signage. (FD) 13. Provide redundant alarms, notification devices, and manual override systems. (FD) 14. Provide classified electrical, Class I, Division 2 unless proven unnecessary by a licensed electrical engineer's review of a certified process engineer's statement that no flammable atmosphere could be present. (FD) 15. Provide certification from a registered fire protection engineer stating no possibility of explosive dust production from the urea unloading process. (FD) 16. Provide proof that all tanks, valves, fittings, pipe, etc. are appropriate for the specified products as determined by an appropriate licensed mechanical engineer. Certification to include a list of all codes and sections for appropriate documentation. (FD) c. During operations at the site, any spill and/or leak shall be immediately reported to the Fire Department. Prior to issuance of building permits, AES Huntington Beach shall submit a Spill/Release Policy, which shall be subject to approval by the Fire Chief. 5. During site development, and/or construction,the following shall be adhered to: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; PLO 1-04att 5 02/14/01 4:55 PM c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. f. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity. 6. Prior to final building permit inspection,the following shall be completed: a. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including: 1) Landscaping; 2) Fire extinguishers shall be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards found in City Specification#424. (FD) 3) Automatic fire sprinkler and fire alarm system may be required. Fire will need to meet with AES personnel to discuss entire system prior to final permit inspection. (FD) 4) Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification#401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. (FD) 5) Installation and/or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and HBFD requirements. Certain areas may require conformance to City Specification#431, Gas Fired Appliances. (FD) 6) This project shall comply with the Cal-ARP program for Hazardous Materials reporting. (FD) b. The applicant shall be responsible for construction the half-width street improvements along the Newland Street frontage of the project site as set forth in the City's letter dated September 23, 1997, from Melanie Fallon to Peter Lersey of SCE. As an alternative, the applicant may enter into an appropriate agreement, with accompanying security,which provides for a cash deposit to be made to the City to pay for the cost of designing and constructing the Newland Street frontage improvements. The City will handle the design and construction of a larger Newland Street widening project extending from Pacific Coast Highway northerly to Hamilton Avenue using the proportionate contribution from this project as well as from other projects having similar frontage improvement obligations. (PW) c. Water Ordinance No. 14.52,the "Water Efficient Landscape Requirements" apply for projects with 2,500 square feet of landscaping and lager. (PW) PL01-04att 6 02/14/01 4:55 PM 1 d. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. (PW) e. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection . (PW) £ Intensified landscape planting and irrigation shall be required for screening in addition to existing living material on site. Intensified landscaping shall be on the south boundary and the easterly (south-east)boundary. Owner shall make functional and obtain 100% coverage with the existing irrigation system. New systems may need to be added and dead or dying plant material shall be replaced. Plans shall include sections demonstrating how the ultimate growth of the plant material will help screen the existing plant. The landscaping and irrigation improvements shall be subject to review and approval of a landscape construction set by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works and Planning Departments. (PW) g. The existing berm, fences, and landscaping along the Newland Street frontage shall be removed and new intensified screening shall be reconstructed behind the right-of-way. The new screening shall be subject to Design Review Board, Planning Director, and Public Works Director approvals. The landscaping shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. (PW) h. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials, an irrigation plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines. (PW) (Code Requirement) i. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. j. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. k. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber,wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 7. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. PLO 1-04att 7 02/14/01 4:55 PM INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall not become effective until the ten working day appeal period has elapsed. For projects in the appealable area of the coastal zone,there is an additional ten working day appeal period that commences when the California Coastal Commission receives the City's notification of final action. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is December 12, 2001, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15,pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 7. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$43.00 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. 8. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission. 9. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 10. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. (PW) 11. A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Department prior to occupying the building. PL01-04att 8 02/14/01 4:55 PM r10 q. r1k MA-1 f 1. PROJECT TITLE: AES POWER GENERATING FACILITY (Selective Catalytic Reduction Units) Concurrent Entitlements: Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49/Coastal Development Permit No:- 00-15/Design Review Board No. 00-39 2. LEAD AGENCY: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Contact: Jane James,Associate Planner Phone: (714)536-5271 3. PROJECT LOCATION: 21730 Newland Street(Northeast of Newland and Pacific Coast Highway) 4. PROJECT PROPONENT: Mr.Han Tan,Engineer AES Huntington Beach,LLC 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 (714)374-1408 5. PROPERTY OWNER: AES Huntington Beach,LLC Mr. Ed Blackford,President 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 (714)374-1408 6. GENERAL PLAN Public DESIGNATION: 7. ZONING: General Industrial-Oil Overlay-Coastal Zone-Flood Plain 8.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: AES Huntington Beach, LLC (AES) proposes to install a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system at Huntington Beach Generating Station's Units 1 and 2. SCR will be used to reduce nitrogen oxide(NO.) emissions as part of AES' plan to meet the declining facility-wide NO,,emission allocation limits required by South Coast Air Quality Management District's(SCAQMD)Regional Clean Air Incentives Market(RECLAIM)Program. Environmental Checklist 1 EA 00-09 The proposed project at the Huntington Beach Generating Station consists of the installation of the following components: • Two SCR Reactor Units: The reactor units will be located in each of the two boiler exhaust ducts between the economizer and air heaters of Units 1 and 2. The units include the installation of carbon steel assemblies comprised of four reactors, 26 feet long x 19 feet wide x 9 feet high. • Control Equipment: The SCR control equipment would be incorporated in to the existing plant distribution control system with new interface hardware. • Ammonia Source Component. The project uses ammonia as the principal NO.reducing agent. Generation of ammonia will be accomplished in one of two ways. The Preferred Approach is to general ammonia onsite using a Urea to Ammonia (U2A) generation process. The U2A system will require installation of a 20 ft. long by 8 ft. wide conversion skid and a 4 ft. long by 5 ft. wide pump skid and will utilize the existing on-site urea storage tanks. Refer to Section IX, Hazards and Hazardous Materials for a complete description of the U2A process. The solid urea will be transported to site every five.days during the summer peak months. The Alternate Approach is to utilize ammonia that is transported to and stored on-site. This will require two I0,000-gallon double walled carbon steel tanks that will contain 19 percent aqueous ammonia.,The tanks will be installed above ground, in separate containment berms, and on an existing concrete pad currently occupied by two urea tanks. The urea tanks would be demolished and removed. An ammonia truck unloading facility is proposed immediately adjacent to the storage tanks. The truck facility will be a modification of the existing urea truck unloading facility. Nineteen percent aqueous ammonia will be transported to the site approximately every 7 days during the summer peak months. All new equipment is proposed within the existing fenceline of the Huntington Beach Generating Station. The SCR Reactor Units would be encased in the existing duct works and would not be visible off-site. All other new components would be installed close to the boiler structures and would also not be visible off-site. A temporary construction laydown area would be located adjacent to Unit 4. The construction of the proposed project is anticipated to occur between January and April of 2001. An outage, or shut down, of the Generating Station is scheduled to begin February 14, 2001. Electrical power will continue to be provided to the Huntington Beach community because power is supplied through a grid system for all of California. AES has scheduled the shut down with California Independent System Operator (CALISO), an organization responsible for ensuring available energy throughout the system. CALISO monitors and staggers routine outtages for general maintenance or installation of new equipment so that sufficient power continues to be available to all users within the grid area. The SCR system is scheduled to be on-line in May of 2001. The construction of the proposed project includes a crew of approximately 30 temporary tradesmen. Construction equipment includes a boom truck,air tugger,eight pack welding machine and a crane. The operation of SCR requires use,resupply, and/or waste disposal of ammonia and catalyst. No water is required for the Aqueous Ammonia (Alternative Approach), however the U2A (Preferred Approach) will utilize approximately 1,700 gallons of water per day during peak summer months. No wastewater is generated during normal SCR operation. The catalyst,which is a honeycomb/air filter type of material,contains vanadium,tungsten, and titanium on a non-hazardous substrate. The guaranteed catalyst life is 3 years and requires replacement at the end of its useful life. The entire system will be designed in accordance with all applicable codes and standards. OTHER PREVIOUS RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATIONIUSE OF PRIOR CERTIFIED EIR(CEQA Guidelines Section 21083.3):None OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED): South Coast Air Quality Management District-"Authority to Construct for Significant de Minimus Modification of Title V"permit. Environmental Checklist 2 EA 00-09 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"or is"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated,"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Public Services ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation z ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION R will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a potentially significant effect(s)on the environment, but at least one effect(1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,and(2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to.be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards,and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION,including revisions or . mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project,nothing further is required. ❑ October 27,2000 Si a e Date Jane James Associate Planner Printed Name Title Environmental Checklist 3 EA 00-09 ATTACHME T N0. s. 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact"answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact"answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impacf' is appropriate, if an effect is significant or potentially significant,or if the lead agency lacks information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more"Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made,preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is warranted. 4. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated"applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVIII,`Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process,an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6. References to information sources for potential impacts(e.g., general plans,zoning ordinances)have been incorporated into the checklist. A source list has been provided in Section XVIII. Other sources used or individuals contacted have been cited in the respective discussions. 7. The following checklist has been formatted after Appendix I of Chapter 3,Title 14, California Code of Regulations,but has been augmented to reflect the City of Huntington Beach's requirements. (Note: Standard Conditions of Approval-The City imposes standard conditions of approval on projects which are considered to be components of or modifications to the project,some of these standard conditions also result in reducing or minimizing environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. However,because they are considered part of the project,they have not been identified as mitigation measures. For the readers' information, a list of applicable standard conditions identified in the discussions has been provided as Attachment No.3. SAMPLE QUESTION.- Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES(and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: Landslides? (Sources: 1, 6) El El0 Discussion: The attached source list explains that 1 is the Huntington Beach General Plan and 6 is a topographical map of the area which show that the area is located in a flat area. (Note: This response probably would not require further explanation). Environmental Checklist 4 EA 00-09 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy,or 11 El ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including,but not limited to the general plan,specific plan, local coastal program,or zoning ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Sources:3,4) b) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or El El Z natural community conservation plan?(Sources:3) c) Physically divide an established community? (Sources: 1,2,3) El El ❑ Discussion: a) The existing plant site is zoned General Industrial and designated Public in the General Plan. The project requires a conditional use permit and coastal development permit to be compliant with the applicable land use plans,policy and regulations.The proposed project meets all development standards of the General Industrial zoning and the project will comply with the City's Land Use,Air Quality,and Public Utilities Elements of the General Plan. b) The project is located entirely within the existing power plant site and does not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plans. c) The project is located entirely within the existing power plant site and does not physically divide an established community. No significant adverse impacts to land use and planning are anticipated. H. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,either directly 11 El (e.g.,by proposing new homes and businesses)or indirectly (e.g.,through extensions of roads or other infrastructure)? (Sources:3) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,necessitating El El 11 IE the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Sources: 1,2,3) c) Displace substantial numbers of people,necessitating the 0 0 construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Sources: 1, 2,3) Discussion: a-c) The implementation of this project does not increase the power generation capacity of the existing power plant and therefore,will not induce substantial population growth. The project is located entirely within the existing power plant site and therefore,does not displace people or necessitate the construction of replacement housing. No significant adverse population and housing impacts resulting from the project are anticipated. Environmental Checklist 5 EA 00-09 1 r Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact III.GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?(Sources:2,3) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?(Sources:2,3) El iii) Seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction? Z El (Sources:2,3) r, iv) Landslides? (Sources:2,3) El 0 b) Result in substantial soil erosion,loss of topsoil,or changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation,grading, or fill? (Sources:2,3,7) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that El would become unstable as a result of the project,and potentially result in on or off-site landslide,lateral spreading, subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? (Sources:2,3,7) d) Be located on expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating substantial risks to life or property? (Sources:2,3,7) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater (Sources:2,3,7) Discussion: a)i-ii). The site is approximately 0.5 miles from a Category A, Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone fault(City of Huntington Beach 1999). However,the project would not introduce additional structures to the existing industrial facility;e.g., any new tanks would replace existing tanks on the existing cement pad and the SCR units would be placed within existing boilers. The existing pad design would be reviewed by a structural engineer to meet and exceed heavy seismic force requirements in the Uniform Building Code by 50 percent(Seismic Importance Factor Ip: 1.5). Under ammonia approach, the connections to the ammonia source would be designed with sufficient flexibility to accommodate any potential seismic shaking. The final engineering design plans would reflect these design standards. The potential substantial adverse effects from fault.rupture are below a level of significance due to the existing and proposed design features associated with the project (see Standard Condition No. 1 on Attachment No.4 requiring compliance with all local and State codes). a) iii). The power plant facility is located in an area designated"Very High Potential" for liquefaction (City of Huntington Beach 1999). However,the project would not introduce additional structures to the existing industrial facility; e.g., any new tanks would replace existing tanks on the existing cement pad and the SCR units would be placed within existing boilers. To address the potential liquefaction risks,the existing cement pad would be reviewed by a structural engineer to meet the lower limit for bearing pressure(most conservative limit)according to the Uniform Building Code. As noted above,the connections Environmental Checklist 6 EA 00-09 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact to the ammonia source would be designed with sufficient flexibility to address any potential for liquefaction. The final engineering design plans would reflect these design standards. The potential substantial adverse effects of liquefaction are below a level of significance due to the existing and proposed design features associated with the proposed project (see Standard Condition No. 1 on Attachment No.4 requiring compliance with all local and State codes). a)iv)The project site is flat and does not contain any unique geologic or physical features. The existing power plant facility is not prone to landslides. b) The project would not result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil. c) The existing power plant facility is not located on unstable soil and the proposed project would not make the soil unstable. d) The project is not located on expansive soil. e) The proposed project does not require additional wastewater infrastructure. No significant adverse impacts to the geology and soils are anticipated. IN.HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge El ❑ El 0 requirements? (Sources:3) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere 0 El El 1 substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table'level(e.g.,the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (Sources:3) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or El 11 110 area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site? (Sources:2,3) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or 11 El 0 area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount or surface . runoff in a manner which would result in flooding.on or off- site? (Sources:2,3) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the 11 capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. (Sources:2,3) f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? (Sources:2,3) ED 0Q g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped 11 El 0 on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Sources: 8) Environmental Checklist 7 EA 00-09 s-7 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Sources 8) i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,injury or death involving flooding,including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (Sources: 8) j) Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? (Sources: 1,3) El El Discussion: a-g)The construction and operation of the proposed project will not require additional water usage,beyond that already used at the existing power plant during the 19 Percent Aqueous Ammonia(Alternative Approach)process described in Section DC, Hazards and Hazardous Materials. The Urea to Ammonia(Preferred Approach)also.described in the Hazards section,below, would require use of approximately 1,700 gallons of water on a peak summer day. This anticipated water usage can be accommodated by the City's water service capacity and does not represent a significant demand. No wastewater is generated during the SCR process by either the 19 Percent Aqueous Ammonia(Alternative Approach)or the Urea to Ammonia (Preferred Approach). The SCR proposed has been designed for efficiency and any water remaining in the generating unit is evaporated. The existing drainage pattern would not be substantially altered with this project and no residential development would be constructed or otherwise affected by the project. h)The Preferred Approach(U2A)does not include placement of any structures that would impede flood waters. The ammonia tanks and associated retaining wall in the Alternative Approach are new exposed structures as part of this project while the SCR catalyst units will be installed within existing boilers. In the Alternative Approach(Aqueous Ammonia)these structures are no larger than the footprint of,and in the same location as,the existing urea tanks that they would replace.Although the existing power plant is within a 100-year flood plain,the tank structures represent a small area of the developed site and would not alter the existing drainage patterns. i)The project would cover a small portion of the existing power plant site and therefore,would not create a significant risk of flooding for people or structures. j)The existing power plant site is within a moderate tsunami run-up area. The small area represented by the ammonia tank structure does not create a new substantial adverse risk from tsunami inundation at the existing power plant facility. No significant adverse impacts to the existing water supply are anticipated. V. AIR QUALITY. Where available,the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality.management or air pollution control district may relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or 19 projected air quality violation? (Sources:3,9) b) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant El concentrations? (Sources: 1,3) c) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of 0 people? (Sources:2,3) d) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air Q ` ..❑ quality plan? (Sources:3,9) Environmental Checklist 8 EA 00-09 r` Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact e) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any, El ❑ ❑X El criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (Sources:3,9) Discussion: a-e)The purpose of the SCR Installation project is to substantially reduce nitrogen oxide(NOx)emissions from existing boilers(Units 1 and 2). The air emissions reduction technology(SCR)removes approximately 90 percent of NOx emissions from Units 1 and 2 at the AES Huntington Beach Generating Station. This effort complies with South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)Rule 1135,Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Electric Power Generating Systems. Temporary emissions from construction traffic are expected but would not result in significant quantities of criteria pollution due to the short construction time(approximately 4 months)and limited number of construction vehicles. If the U2A (Preferred Approach)is selected to generate ammonia for SCR,the maximum monthly urea delivery during summer peak months would be five trucks. The Aqueous Ammonia(Alternative Approach)would require a maximum monthly aqueous ammonia delivery during summer peak months of eight trips. In either case,the project would result in less than significant quantities of criteria pollutants. This project provides significant beneficial air quality impacts by reducing NOx emissions and does not conflict or obstruct implementation of an applicable air quality plan,violate any air quality standard,result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant,expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations,or create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. A small percentage of ammonia emissions normally occurs as part of the NOx control(injection)process. Ammonia emissions are strictly regulated by SCAQMD-backed limitations that restrict"ammonia slip"levels. Specifically,SCAQMD requires AES to utilize Best Available Control Technology(BECT)to ensure release of a maximum of 10 parts per million of ammonia during the NOx control process. No significant air quality impacts to the area are anticipated and in fact the purpose of the SCR Installation project is to substantially reduce nitrogen oxide(NOx)emissions from the plant. VI.TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to El 11 0 the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system(e.g., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads,or congestion at intersections? (Sources:2,3, 11) b) Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a level of service standard established by the county congestion management El El 19 agency for designated roads or highways? (Sources:3, 11) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Sources: 1,2,3) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature(e.g., El 11 El 9 sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses? (Sources:2) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Sources: 1,2,3) El El El 19 f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Sources:2,4) 0 Environmental Checklist 9 EA 00-09 £� Tt r*I �sioi Gg i'E' { Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative ❑ 11 El transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? (Sources:2, 3) Discussion: a-b) Access to the project site will be via Newland Street and/or Pacific Coast Highway. During the 4-month construction period,this project would add approximately 20 construction vehicles to the existing traffic load.If the U2A(Preferred . Approach)is selected to generate ammonia for SCR,the maximum monthly urea delivery during summer peak months would be five trucks. The Aqueous Ammonia(Alternative Approach)would require a maximum monthly aqueous ammonia delivery during summer peak months of eight trips. The deliveries are scheduled to occur at non-peak traffic hours along major roads and freeways. The short duration of increased truck trips during construction and operation will not cause a substantial increase to existing traffic loads nor exceed a level of service standard.Construction traffic during the project's development stage may result in short-term interruptions to traffic circulation,including pedestrian and bicycle flow in the area. Based on the scope of the project construction,the short-term interruptions to traffic is not considered to be significant. However,any impact may be further reduced through implementation of standard conditions of approval requiring Department of Public Works approval of a construction vehicle control plan(see Standard Condition No.3 on Attachment No.4). c)The project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns. d-g)The project does not require any alteration to roadways,emergency access or parking. No significant adverse impacts to transportation/traffic are anticipated. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through El El 0 habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans, policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S,Fish and Wildlife Service? (Sources: 3) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or Q other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Sources:3) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected El El Q wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including,but not limited to,marsh,vernal pool,coastal,etc.) through direct removal,filling,hydrological interruption,or other means? (Sources:3) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native El El 9 resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (Sources:3) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting Q biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (Sources:3) Environmental Checklist 10 EA 00-09 ( Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact =No Impact f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ❑ El El Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan,or other approved local,regional,or state habitat conservation plan? (Sources:3) Discussion: a-f) Although mature trees and landscaping exist around the perimeter of the AES Power Generation Facility,the SCR Installation project will be located entirely within the existing power plant site and will have no adverse effects on biological resources and no conflict with any local policies,ordinances or conservation plans. Ultimately,the AES project site will be subject to street widening and public improvements along Newland,which may impact existing landscaping resources. However,the conditional use permit and coastal development permit for this project are expected to contain long-term conditions of approval requiring an agreement with the City of Huntington Beach,with the appropriate security,to AES' fair share contribution toward the design and improvements of a wider Newland Street and replacement landscaping. VIII. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Sources:3) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral El El 19 resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan,or other land use plan? (Sources:3) Discussion: a-b)The project will be located entirely within the existing power plant site and will not result in the loss or availability of mineral resources. No significant impacts to mineral resources are anticipated. IX.HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment 0 El through the routine transport,use,or disposal of hazardous materials? (Sources: 1,2,3, 12, 13, 14) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment El 19 through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Sources: 1,2,3, 12, 13, 14) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely El El El hazardous material,substances,or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Sources: 1,2,3, 12, 13, 14) _ Environmental Checklist 11 EA 00-09 AT . lI Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact -No Impact d) Be located on a.site which is included on a list of hazardous ❑ El ❑X materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Sources: 1,2,3, 12, 13, 14) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where El El El Z such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or pubic use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Sources: 1,3) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the El ❑ project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Sources: 1,3) r g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an El El El adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Sources:2,3) Discussion: a) There are two possible approaches for mitigating the potential transportation.hazards associated with the proposed project. One approach employs a urea-to-ammonia process to generate ammonia directly at the facility on an as- needed basis. The other approach involves the use of 19 percent aqueous ammonia, a concentration that is significantly below the 29 percent strength that is typically used for SCR Each of these approaches is described below. UREA-TO-AMMONIA PROCESS—Preferred Approach AES Southland, L.L.C. (AES) proposes to implement a Urea-to-Ammonia (U2A) generation process, thereby removing the potential risks associated with transport or storage of aqueous ammonia. AES is currently testing this process at the AES Alamitos Generating Station. Based on the preliminary results of such testing, a U2A process appears to be feasible for use at the AES Huntington Beach facility. AES anticipates that pilot testing on the U2A process will be complete by November 15,2000. If,as expected,the final results of the pilot testing demonstrate that the U2A process is appropriate for use,then AES is committed to implementing this process at the Huntington Beach Generating Station. As described more fully below,the rate of NO.reduction using ammonia generated from a U2A process is exactly the same as that achieved using aqueous ammonia. However, since urea is being used, the U2A process eliminates the potential risks associated with transport and storage of aqueous ammonia. As such, the use of the U2A process will mitigate all impacts associated with transport,storage and use of hazardous materials to a less than significant level. Basic Process The proposed SCR air pollution control system requires ammonia to react with NO.in the exhaust gases to reduce NO.emissions. In the U2A process,solid dry urea is dissolved in deionized water to produce an aqueous solution of urea. This solution is then converted to a gaseous mixture of ammonia,carbon dioxide and water for use in the SCR catalyst. The only two chemicals required for this process are urea and water;no high-concentration ammonia would be transported to or stored at the facility. In fact,the only ammonia present at the facility would be a small amount in _ the reactor that is at an active concentration of less than 2 percent--significantly less than the 29 percent concentration of aqueous ammonia typically used during SCR and also less than the 19 percent strength proposed under the Alternative Approach described below. Environmental Checklist 12 EA 00-09 ATTACK'Ati'4` sI . 5.��. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Process Structures and Flow The solid urea, a non-hazardous material, would be delivered by truck in quantities of 25 tons; estimated delivery is every five days during peak summer months. The urea would be pneumatically transferred from the delivery truck to a dry urea storage bin from which the urea is discharged to a continuous dissolver, made of plastic or carbon steel. The pneumatic transfer is completely enclosed and would be located in the general location as the existing urea storage tanks. Heat is applied to the aqueous solution in the dissolver by a solution heater, in order to maintain a constant ammonia gas supply pressure. The urea solution is recirculated with the urea transfer/circulation pump through the stream-' or electrically-heated urea solution heater,which makes-up for the endothermic heat loss from the solution of urea, and then back to the continuous dissolver. The urea solution from the continuous dissolver is pumped to the hydrolysis reactor. In the reactor, the urea in the solution is first hydrolyzed to ammonium carbamate,which then decomposes into ammonia and carbon dioxide vapor. The heat input to the reactor for the hydrolysis and water evaporation is controlled to provide constant gas pressure. The urea to ammonia conversion section will be mounted on a skid,which includes a feed pump,the control instrumentation,electrical interface panel,reactor with stem heating coils and ammonia flow control valve. The skid is designed with a catch basin to collect any spill of solution from the feed piping or the reactor. The urea solution is pumped from a dissolver or solution feed to the hydrolysis skid. USE OF 19 PERCENT AQUEOUS AMMONIA—Alternate Approach As noted above, the proposed SCR air pollution control system requires ammonia to react with NO. in the exhaust gases to reduce NO,, emissions. If for some reason, the U2A process cannot be used to generate the required ammonia,then 19 percent aqueous ammonia will be used at the AES Huntington Beach facility instead. Under this approach,ammonia would be delivered to the facility mixed with water at a concentration of 19 percent, significantly less than the 29 percent solution typically used for SCR. Deliveries of the aqueous ammonia solution would be made to the facility by tanker truck. These trucks would be traveling on public roads. Trucking of aqueous ammonia is regulated for safety by the U.S.Department of Transportation. The 19 percent aqueous ammonia would be transported to the site approximately every 7 days during the summer peak months. There is a very small probability that a tanker truck could be involved in an accident spilling its contents. However, quantification of this risk would be too speculative given the limited number of shipping events anticipated for this project. Nonetheless,this risk can be minimized by ensuring that a safe route is used and that shipments are made during off-peak times. The following mitigation measures are recommended to address these issues: • Prior to the first delivery of aqueous ammonia to the site,a truck haul route map shall be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. • The haul route shall minimize rail crossings and crossing of busy unprotected intersections. • The haul route shall not come within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. • Deliveries shall not be en route to the site between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM or between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM weekdays. • The haul route shall be resubmitted if suppliers are changed. Use of a reduced-concentration, 19 percent aqueous ammonia solution, in conjunction with the mitigation measures described above,will mitigate all impacts associated with transport,transport, storage and use of hazardous materials to a less than significant level. Environmental Checklist 13 EA 00-09 I Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact --No Impact b) The same two approaches discussed above also can be used to mitigate the potential hazards associated with upset or accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment from the proposed project. UREA-TO-AMMONIA PROCESS-Preferred Approach Process The U2A process itself will mitigate all potential hazards associated with upset or accident of a hazardous material,in addition to removing all risks associated with transport of hazardous materials,to a less than significant level. Please refer to Section IX, a. for a detailed discussion of the U2A process. No additional mitigation measures are necessary under the Preferred U2A process. However, approval of a truck haul route plan by the Public Works Department is still an appropriate condition of approval and will be included as a standard condition on the project. USE OF 19 PERCENT AQUEOUS AMMONIA-Alternate Approach Process The proposed SCR system requires the onsite storage of ammonia. The ammonia used would be in aqueous solution at a concentration of 19 percent,significantly less than is typically used for SCR.'Aqueous ammonia at concentrations less than 20 percent is not considered a regulated toxic substance under federal Risk Management Program requirements (Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 68). However, under current California Office of Emergency Services (OES) regulations implementing the California Accidental Release Program (CalARP) requirements, there is no threshold concentration of aqueous ammonia for exclusion from the program (California Health and Safety Code Section 2770.1). The proposed project therefore would not be required to submit a risk management plan (RMP) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA),but would be required to submit an RMP to the local agency implementing the CalARP program, which for the proposed project site is currently the Huntington Beach Fire Department. Compliance with CalARP requirements must be achieved prior to delivery of the proposed aqueous ammonia onsite. In particular, the RMP must include an offsite consequence analysis (OCA),for the worst-case accidental release of ammonia, as well as a hazards and process safety review, a description of operating procedures, training and maintenance to minimize the occurrence of an accidental release, and a description of the facility's emergency response program. It should be noted that on June 19, 1998, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) issued recommended changes to the list of regulated substances in the CalARP program that included a proposed change in aqueous ammonia applicability to solutions of 20 percent concentration or greater, which would match the federal program. Thus,both the EPA and the OEHHA have determined that aqueous ammonia of less than 20 percent concentration does not present a significant toxic risk;however, the California OES has not yet acted,on OEHHA's proposed change. If these changes are not in place by the time aqueous ammonia is proposed to be brought onsite,then in accordance with current OES regulations, an RMP would need to be filed with the Huntington Beach Fire Department. In the event that this project needs to file an RMP to comply with CalARP requirements,the following describes an OCA for a worst-case release of ammonia at the proposed facility that follows EPA guidelines (EPA 1993, 1999). The EPA has specified"endpoints"for regulated substances in 40 CFR 68.22(a)and Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 68 for use in RMP OCAS. For ammonia,the toxic endpoint is 200 parts per million(ppm).This level is equivalent to an Emergency Response Planning Guideline 2 (ERPG-2) level, an airborne concentration at which a person could be exposed for up to one hour without experiencing potentially irreversible health effects or symptoms which could impair an individual's ability to take protective action. At concentrations below this value, the EPA has determined that serious injuries as a result of short-term exposures would not occur. Ammonia has good warning properties due to its low odor and irritation thresholds. Studies differ on ammonia odor thresholds,with results ranging from 5 to 50 ppm. Slight/minor irritation of the nose, eyes, and throat is reported at levels of 72 to 134 ppm. Severe upper respiratory tract irritation with adverse effects including coughing and lung damage is reported to occur at a concentration of 500 ppm. Environmental Checklist 14 EAR 00-09 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact -"No Impact The maximum onsite storage of aqueous ammonia would be in two, double-walled, 10,000-gallon storage tank. The maximum release quantity at the facility under a worst-case scenario would be a total failure of both walls of one of the storage tanks. Under this scenario, the tank's contents would flow into a bermed containment area, creating an evaporating pool with an estimated exposed surface area of about 727 square feet(67.5 square meters). EPA RMP guidance (EPA 1996) provides that emissions from an evaporating pool can be assessed by equations accounting for evaporative and convective losses to the atmosphere. Emissions from the above worst-case ammonia release were estimated from the following model for evaporative emissions from a low volatility liquid(EPA 1993): E=6.94x 10'7(1+0.0043(Ta-273.15h Ur0-75 AP M(p„/p�h) where: E = emission rate(kg/s) ur = ambient wind speed at 10-m altitude(m/s) T. = ambient temperature(°K);here T.must be greater than 273.15°K A = pool area(m) M = molecular weight(kg/kgmol),which is 17 for ammonia p„ = vapor pressure of the chemical(Pa) pvh = vapor pressure of hydrazine at T.(Pa) The value for ph is given by: p„h=exp[76.8580-(7245.2/Ta)-8.221n(T.)+0.006155TJ The predicted emissions are a function of "pool area",ambient temperature, ambient wind speed,molecular weight, and vapor pressure of ammonia above the liquid. The calculation was performed at an ambient temperature of 1107,obtained from the National Climatic Data Center as the highest temperature of record at Los Angeles International Airport (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oVclimate/online/cdd/extrememax.html), a coastal location representative of Huntington Beach. The vapor pressure of ammonia over the pool was calculated for a 19 percent ammonia solution at an assumed liquid temperature 20T above the maximum ambient temperature of 110T to account for additional heat absorption by a paved surface. The ammonia vapor pressure was calculated from information contained in Perrv's Chemical Engineer's Handbook,6d'Edition,McGraw-Hill Inc., 1984. The resulting evaporative emission rate for ammonia from the pool was calculated at approximately 23.8 pounds per minute(lb/min)under a 1.5-m/s wind. A 1.5-m/s-wind speed is specified by the EPA along with an atmospheric stability class of"F"(very stable)for use in atmospheric dispersion modeling of worst- case releases. At this emission rate,the ammonia in the pool would completely evaporate in about 10 hours. Thus,the pool would persist long enough over the short-term exposure period of interest in this analysis. Higher wind speeds would increase convective losses from the pool, but also increase atmospheric dispersion. Mathematically, atmospheric concentrations are directly proportional to the quotient of emissions divided by wind speed. Emissions are calculated in the above equation as proportional to wind speed to the 0.75 power. Therefore,given the calculation techniques used in this OCA, the effect of increasing wind speeds will always produce lower atmospheric concentrations, thus the 1.5-m/s wind speed calculation of emissions will produce the worst-case distance to toxic endpoint. The atmospheric dispersion of the ammonia emissions was calculated using the RMP*Comp (v 1.06) dispersion - modeling program(developed by the EPA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA)). The model assumes an ambient temperature of 77°F, which is not an important factor in dispersion calculations for this type of neutrally buoyant release. Temperature does matter in the evaporative emissions calculation, where a maximum ambient temperature of 110°F was used as discussed above. The surface roughness used in the RMP*COMP modeling was "urban", as there are structures and equipment over 25 feet high surrounding the modeled release point. An "urban" roughness indicates there are many obstacles where the spill has occurred, increasing mixing effects as the plume moves around the objects. Environmental Checklist 15 EA 00-09 ref At,I ' s NO. S.t� � ?otentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact =No Impact An ammonia concentration of 200 ppm was calculated to occur at a distance of 0.1 mile from the 10,000-gallon storage tank under the worst-case release scenario and worst-case atmospheric dispersion conditions. The 0.1-mile distance reaches offsite only along the Pacific Coast Highway and into the beach parking lots south of the Pacific Coast Highway, as well as about 300 feet east of the facility, which is currently undeveloped property. The closest permanent residents in the vicinity of the power plant are located in a trailer park west of the facility. The atmospheric modeling shows that the worst-case release would dissipate to less than 200 ppm by the time any atmospheric release would reach the trailer park. Thus, there are no permanent residents within the calculated worst- case zone of concentrations exceeding 200 ppm. Any individuals within this zone would most likely be driving by the facility on Pacific Coast Highway or in the beach parking lots,where they could easily take protective action given the good warning properties of ammonia. It should also be noted that the prevailing westerly(on-shore)sea breeze off of the Pacific Ocean on most days would send daytime releases generally in the opposite direction from the beach,where an offsite consequence to toxic endpoint has been shown to not occur. At night, "land breezes" created by warmer ocean waters relative to a cooler land surface could blow releases toward the beach;however, at night, an occupied beach would not be expected, the actual emission rate would be lower than that modeled since the air temperature would be lower than 11OT, and the wind speed produced by a land breeze would likely be greater than 1.5 m/s on most occasions. In conclusion, this assessment of a worst-case release shows potential ammonia concentrations exceeding, 200 ppm within 0.1 mile of the proposed 10,000-gallon storage tanks,which could go offsite over the Pacific Coast Highway, beach parking lots, and unoccupied property to the east of the facility. Should aqueous ammonia of less than 20 percent concentration be covered by OES CaIARP regulations at the time the aqueous ammonia would be brought onsite,the facility would be required to prepare an RMP that would specify process controls designed to minimize the occurrence of an accidental release. Should there be a release,the modeled offsite impact is unlikely but theoretically possible in areas with no permanent residents. Therefore,no significant risk to the public is reasonably expected from foreseeable upset or accident conditions involving the release of hazardous substances. c) The existing facility is not within one-quarter mile of a school or proposed school. d) The project is located on the property of the existing power plant. The existing power plant is not on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. e) The project is located on the existing power plant property and is not within 2 miles of an airport. The project is not located near a private airstrip. g) The project is located on the property of an existing power plant. Under the Preferred Approach,urea would be used and an amended emergency response plan would not be necessary. If the Alternative Approach is utilized,an amended emergency response plan shall be prepared and submitted in the required RMP to address the new ammonia storage and' handling facilities,but will not interfere with any existing emergency evacuation plans. h) The project will not increase the risk of additional loss,injury or death involving wildland fires,as the project would be constructed within an existing industrial plant and meet all relevant fire codes. X. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess Q of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? (Sources:2,3,5,6) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne El 11 El 0 vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Sources:2,3) Environmental Checklist 16 EA 00-09 °�V$ i`�11y Nu. S`Re Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the El El El project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (Sources:2,3,6) d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise El El El 0 levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (Sources:2,3,6) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where ❑ 19 such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Sources:2,3) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the ❑ El El 19 project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Sources:2,3) Discussion: a-d)The project will generate short-term noise impacts during construction with the use of heavy construction equipment. In accordance with the City of Huntington Beach's Noise Control Ordinance(Section 8.40.090(d)), construction activities for the proposed project shall not occur between the hours of 8 PM and 7 AM(Monday through Saturday)or at anytime on Sunday or on a federal holiday. A construction permit will be obtained for the proposed project and therefore,the construction activities between the hours of 7 AM and 8 PM on weekdays(Monday through Saturday)are exempt from the City's Noise Control Ordinance pursuant to exemptions in Section 8.40.090(City of Huntington Beach 1993). The operation of the SCR units will not significantly increase the existing noise levels at the generating station. e-f)The project is not within an airport Iand use plan or in the vicinity of a private airstrip. No significant noise impacts resulting from the project are anticipated. M.PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Environmental Checklist 17 EA 00-09 AT AL; i{+fi�E_�'�_ ���• S•I Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact "No Impact a) Fire protection? (Sources:3) El El El b) Police Protection? (Sources:3) El c) Schools? (Sources:3) El El El 0 d) Parks? (Sources:3) e) Other public facilities or governmental services? (Sources:3) ❑ } 19 Discussion: r. 'I a-e)The proposed project has initially been reviewed by the various City Departments,including Public Works,Fire,Police, and Planning,for compliance with all applicable City codes. With implementation of standard conditions of approval,and compliance with City specifications,no significant adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. The project would be located within an existing power plant facility and would not substantially increase the demand for public services. No significant adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable 11 El El Regional Water Quality Control Board? (Sources:3) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources:3) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water a drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources:3) d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources,or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (Sources:3) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider El 11 0 which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (Sources:3) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to El0 accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (Sources:3) g) Comply with federal,state,and local statutes and regulations ElQ related to solid waste? (Sources:3) Environmental Checklist 18 EA 00-09 ATTAR' 5.113 l ?otentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: a-g)The Alternative Approach project will not require additional water supply. However,the Preferred Approach will require approximately 1,700 gallons per day during peak summer months. This anticipated water usage can be accommodated by the City's water service capacity and does not represent a significant demand. No wastewater is generated during the SCR process by either the 19 Percent Aqueous Ammonia(Alternative Approach)or the Urea to Ammonia(Preferred Approach). The SCR process has been designed for efficiency and any water remaining in the generating unit is evaporated. The project will not generate a substantial increase in solid waste. No adverse impacts to the City's utilities or services are anticipated. XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Sources: 11 El 19 El 1,2,3) b) Substantially damage scenic resources,including,but not El 11 limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Sources: 1,2,3) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of 0 the site and its surroundings? (Sources: 1,2) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would El 11 El 9 adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Sources: 2) Discussion: a-d) Installation of the two SCR units is proposed within existing mechanical equipment and will not result in a substantial visual alteration of the facility. The new equipment on the ground and within the existing boilers will not be visible from surrounding properties and will not have a substantial effect on a scenic vista,a scenic resource,and will not create new light sources. The project will be built within the existing fenceline of the AES Huntington Beach Generating Station facility and would not create a negative aesthetic effect. XW. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a 1 historical resource as defined in 515064.5? (Sources:3) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an El 0 archaeological resource pursuant to 515064.5? (Sources:3) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource 0 or site unique geologic feature? (Sources:3) d) Disturb any human remains,including those interred outside of El n formal cemeteries? (Sources:3) Environmental Checklist 19 EA 00-09 ATTACH-?� � �� . s I. .'otentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: a-d)The project would not disturb any soil and would be limited to a previously disturbed site within an existing power plant site. Therefore,the project would have no adverse effects on cultural resources. XV. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood, ❑ community and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Sources:2) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the El 0 El ❑X construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Sources: 2,3) c) Affect existing recreational opportunities?(Sources: 1) ❑ ❑ El 9 Discussion: a-b)The project would not increase the use of existing recreation facilities nor require construction or expansion of these facilities. XVI.AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects,lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model(1997) prepared by the California Dept.of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of 11 El ❑ 1 Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non- agricultural use? (Sources: 1,3) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a Williamson Act contract? (Sources: 1,3) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,due El El 9 to their location or nature,could result in conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use? (Sources: 1,3) Discussion: a-c)The project would be built within the footprint of an existing industrial facility. The project would not directly or indirectly convert farmland or conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or Williamson Act contract since the property and the surrounding vicinity is not currently used for agricultural purposes nor is the property zoned for agricultural use.;_ Environmental Checklist 20 M ,1A 0000_ 9 ATT �# 2otentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact `No Impact XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (Sources: 1,2,3,6) b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" -❑ IT. 9 `YEl means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects.) (Sources:3,6) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or ❑ ❑X El El indirectly? (Sources:2,3,6, 12, 13, 14) Discussion: a)The purpose of the project is to improve air quality via the reduction of NOx emissions for Units 1 and 2. All aspects of this pollution control project will be located within an existing power plant facility. Therefore,the project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment nor substantially reduce or affect fish or wildlife habitat or the species within that habitat. b)This project will be cumulatively beneficial to air quality in the region by substantially reducing NOx emissions from Units 1 and 2. The project will not result in cumulatively considerable adverse impacts due to the short duration of construction and the beneficial air quality impacts during operation. c)Under the Preferred Approach(Urea to Ammonia Process),hazardous materials are not transported or stored on site,and therefore,the project represents no significant risk or adverse impacts to human beings. Under the Alternative Approach(19 Percent Aqueous Ammonia),an assessment of a worst-case release of ammonia from the total failure of one double-walled, 10,000-gallon aqueous ammonia storage tank shows only a minor potential impact within 0.1 mile of the tank,which could go offsite over the Pacific Coast Highway,beach parking lots,and unoccupied property to the south of the facility. The facility currently is required to prepare a Risk Management Program(RMP)that would specify process controls designed to minimize the occurrence of an accidental release. Should there be a release,the modeled offsite impact is unlikely but theoretically possible and the facility would implement an emergency response program as detailed in the RMP. The closest permanent residents in the vicinity of the power plant are located in a trailer park west of the facility. The atmospheric modeling shows that the worst-case release would dissipate to less than 200 ppm by the time any atmospheric release would reach the trailer park. Thus,there are no permanent residents within the calculated worst-case zone of concentrations exceeding 200 ppm. Any individuals within this zone would most likely be driving by the facility on Pacific Coast Highway or in the beach parking lots, where they could easily take protective action given the good warning properties of ammonia. Please refer to Section IX, above. Therefore,no significant risk to the public is reasonably expected from foreseeable upset or accident conditions involving the release of hazardous substances. Environmental Checklist 21 EA 00-09 TT�CH NFEINT . 5• 21 EARLIER ANALYSIS Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process,one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). Earlier Documents Prepared and Utilized in this Analysis Reference# Document Title Available for Review at: 1 Project Vicinity Map See Attachment No. 1 2 Reduced Site Plan,Building Elevations,and Photo Simulations See Attachment No.2 3 City of Huntington Beach General Plan and General Plan EIR City of Huntington Beach Planning Dept.,3rd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 4 City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance " �r 5 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code City of Huntington Beach City Clerk's Office,2nd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 6 Project Narrative See Attachment No.3 7 Geotechnical Inputs Report-City of Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach Planning Dept.,3rd Floor 2000 Main St. I Huntington Beach i 8 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map(Jan.3,1997) 9 CEQA Air Quality Handbook,South Coast Air Quality Management " District(1993) 10 City of Huntington Beach CEQA Procedures Handbook " 11 Trip Generation,4th Edition,Institute of Traffic Engineers " 12 EPA. 1993. Guidance on the Application of Refined Dispersion Available Upon Request at Models to Hazardous/Toxic Air Pollutant Releases. EPA- City of Huntington Beach 454/R-93-002. April 30. Planning Dept.,3rd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 13 EPA. 1999. Technical Background Document for Offsite Consequence Analysis for Anhydrous Ammonia,Aqueous " Ammonia,Chlorine,and Sulfur Oxide. Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Office. April. 14 Institute of Clean Air Companies,Inc.1999. Final Draft,White Paper:Use of Ammonia in NOx Air Pollution Control " Systems. June(Rev.2). Environmental Checklist 22 EA 00-09 r Attachment No. 1 r Project Vicinity MaD Environmental Checklist 23 EA 00-09 y 5.23 1 n�1a�In�`�'�'1 f y:,��,� `'�y��`I� L M(►R�r,�f1J"'�+, ., � �� , . t/' +•[l � y rt1�`t ;tJ � .x�; y •+ t r� t�,�V v� � ,' ' :'� � r � .7' 'rA� 1 ° fir''G � r7�0,2 r�_ �i,4 f '"1 it•;�Y .Y 't �.�\��.1� +,��4, ,ys I ��7. -i ;rI . tif`�r+ .,�. '+ t 'd,/, �� •� .>ra �' ' ` P�rev , "'fF ,� r�,jt �,.•S �,,. _ �• `{ ,, ,a. ��1,� ,S I r 1 - y�,�op�'` ""ram' • � 'a'� � 14 t �' It I r' t • � � i yu1 �f I ,A'., a 1 I It `mot:. 1. . 1 �!•,r r''�,'!t�'r� '�( / ..r,�/ ,• ! 1 4 .i'+�d � w:�'+ Mll a r, a •� +• ,/ �� .1 / /` ..Lr t ���. 1,, .» W�M!°!w ypa,� � 7( \I It, � , • Wry y ►. ,+ fjlMMt r,M, ��7+..1' i� � 11u '�� ��l��I. /1. y t �, ,f +' ' . 1, � , .� 'P 1* r lti f/' ,/ ,• .n 1'' •1, .ir I I t ,.�,t �'1, � 1��7 ( �,��,. �'W" 'W LNhn�M►.�I.yr���. r� h ��� � �y r �/.. �j+l �.�:��"•,. �"�� meI, � ;•!�„L;�., A�'',� :Jj!��' �; , � � tti ;',,�,a���Q� AES • BEACH LOCATION Project No.: 6600000008.00 Date: MAY 2000 Project:- AES HUNTINGTON BEACH LLC 111 I I ' Attachment No. 2 Reduced Site Plan and Building Elevations, Environmental Checklist 24 EA`00-09 c 6 5 4 SEWER EJECTION 11LLATE PUMPS O -� STATION CAN SHELTER SHELTER OAS Z iHELTER TRANSFORMERS COMPRESSOR SHOPSS ro O• WAREHOUSE IL SLAB eoo WIR eLAe PARKING I FEWER ADMOL eloa EXCH�A !` HYDROGEN � UMF WELL 4— STORAGE C C Q O❑ O❑Q. I--I SERVICE WATER ueu• CHORINATOa —1� TARN - / PUMP FLAB LLIBt OE. + / I AREA UINL—C �•• ••�1 a + + r SEfi[IVNG.106006•LA+TW FOR DETAILED PLOT PLAN DEMBL -- SHOWING NEW EQUIPMENT INSTALLED INTHIS AREA �.. AREA MIN. 8 • • O O • AREA TANKS OEMR4 WIR SCREEN c 00.SEPARATORor - OWELL \ BOILER \\'O.—LJ//WAIIN EM DIMIN.-t�37===:o� STACKAREA —L-I DEMIK,-' VN.LR BOIL WIN L7001LERWASH RETENTION WIN , ACID RETENTION WIN WATER /METER '• A An IIeLRIRAIID us W=O LITILI Y tYSTOMS.N ter✓ n��Wo SRL PLOP PLAN DRLWWC v• a Iro.[ wm nnn �• t IJ 6 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 r 11 I 1 I 11 • NOTE: p 1) OUTLINE OF NEW DUCT COMPONENTS I I L' 11 P I I 1 1 • S H OWN IN BOLD 1 2) NEW STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN IS ' PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO FINAL STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. �• ' ' I� 3) NEW STRUCTURAL STEEL SHOWN AS PHANTOM LINES --11 11 I hI 1 i 4) DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR BOILERS 1 do 2 rw •• O ♦ ® 0 l/ll Val tal tullm p moral a�aura:Ywl�� Yr 1Yula �- W wo■•atrl 11 /1 11 1 1611 •11 p/l /1 4 1 1141 W p MAlla 1 1' N I b RIr MYrk 1 plli 1. `t w 'll 01a..m11 1/ 1r111 1 1 1 ' 1 .P V+WY Y11 Iw/tr�� - B i i atlnll y 1 Y Iw I M Ir-I.r 1 1 , B .Ie I PrM OMIK.M rT- r/��' I I I In ws..a anar I t ✓ _ 1 I 1 r roans 11 is satrl ( 1 r aoaow ,-^` oaw tawr orna aY„ I A 1AES S0U06AN0 BLS _ I I MPUED IliRJTY SY!�!.rw Ir-me M"41' 11/rat 20606 w.r worno DIYAnom OMWINO 0I `�,�„�" J' SDI l6160-fR �.:+ la D 0 6-N-50 A "' .r I:loo uam calm I1. 1 R • 8 7 6 . . 5 � � 2 t D DENO AND RoAa m"OF D%ISTNa SUWS.T.B.D. ---------------------- Ir------ ------------ - --------------- II I I 1 I t I I I [KI51IN0 AREA TANK rOUNDATWN(NOTE I) 1 1 1 ) I I I I • II - - 1 tT'-B•TO CENTER tM Or STACK I II •' I � 1 1 I IT 1 • 1 I I r I I I I • 1 - I 1 — � 1 I 11 11 I J I I .11 I I I 10 T/Y 1v I 11 - - I . ' II II 1 ------------ -- ------ - ------------- --- --- r LLO I III,=GAN DOU&.f 8 WALL!IEEE TANK(TIP.J) 8 _--_ -__-------------.-- -- NEW RETAININO WALL - rC7 / (J•NICK) n--- -�-� I--------------- ------- ------- ----------------;1 Inl InlInt it NOTES: 1i ...� 1)SwABNJP/Or EXISTING FOUND~TD Be •TB'-1 J/{• CONFIRMED DURING DETAILED ENGINEERING .. m. �)ALL NEW EDUIPUENT SHOWN AS BROKEN UNES - A T 9 F" .. _ wSDNTIAND LLS ^ q.r✓ J)ALL dMENSIOWV.IT 10 FINAL CONCERNING ME TANK. n R MPIJBD V-lq+IrY 8 7 -I.INC. LOCA1KfNS SUBJECT TO iBW.ENGINEERING �„��� "" ��e� ,LL1UV1-+•---� 4201 A TANK DRAWING TANKLOCATION OC.h s)SEC O N-SO.I FOR AMMONIA - V 1 TANK LOCATIONTION ON SITE. G:�',:��M� „A 1_ s r.•.P uaa�n•Im �. r !CA 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 I BOILER UNIT 2 1 I I I BOILER UNIT 1 1 I I t I I 1 I t I NEW ANNONU WJEC110N STSIEY - NEW uTurlT .1 11 1 I - I 1 1 UED 1•`• t 1 1 P[A 80111A) I11 1 1 11 I I 1 • 11 1 11 � 1 1 1 H H I 1 � C � r ♦ i VAAPPOMUT10N 18 . . 75' PLC FOR tW I C: A� uccDATiE1DESI aM _��••--�"• (NEW) (N PLC 1DN UNIT t (NEW) � (N�® UP!" 1'-t• TANK AREA r « a T'-d' (SEE DW(L 20eee-M-502) VOSTW0 STACK . ws POWER DP6AR'IA&(NEW) Y .L tA NOTES: ~r�"`~� AES SOVPOANO US APPLIED unuTv SYSTEMS,INC. 1)SEC DPAWND 206ee-M-S00►on vTt PLOT PLAN PLOT PLAN SCR AREA to.ee WPLOT PUN/sea AREA ~ n .eo D"WIND A wy - n D 068 -M-50 A n 1.•.1' uras r..na 1 8 7 6 5 4 k 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 r e ��i.�ryi•i r • a t !.•�, .� y 4����4�"t`"y ��trcg�t�(a!� �1�.��, � r r'_t• + l t '.'ik '31 ���� '1, J H }'rsd jr �i'�. `�Ek� L"'-" ..�• D x,• �i c I�,..,'E .,•� ; r J , iP {,rf}r ji'�",�NK;1•��`` �`� �,s..s�� D .:..�r r' • I f 1 r Or ;"17 Ytis � I' ,u.: :NI IMJ , i �t$j+�� I•H E•"7 � Irt..�, �°,� • �v,�rc� ly+try,y�„hi�,1�,l�•1a�•,!`��L , ',11 �'� E���)� . :•1 t }y�rrttl��iy`�•J*ilrxF.c. � a./ ((1�' t` �r� ��§ '�`'t t Y„ L ��I� A4 J,�i}�({+}!�• d ( S !d v i °I� .• ffilr :y y, <'{�w��4 �f kf � �' °'� •x i;<z• Ilk I�i i '�r, 'h• .. '_. r*Ewn, . C -y •.a.' a IS F'1 'a •� f Ik '• ! C 2+I"''i 1 � � J�.`.i {.-. 9ti�lA�'�,r�fl �;•i r rr�Y.• �E 1 ��•�� .�•'?� ,rj ° 1��t1��i cl..1/� t t!I •' ' tt a�.l r fr 1'Jki1�f1�7� i� },_�i� `�Y1 1, :1. • t+�l•{Xre•. a it',�"1"` 1 't .4 ,� '°E> "`t+,tE•S{ E _.e{. '�` r r h +°r` � ��J 1�.��'E F,�+Yp.;f M1 i a 4 •1�' 4,.. E 'M'l l -\ 4 t� r r« � •, � 1' ��•�•1 • ti c',.c;i'. �'• � i�'� �, k .. i ,£ fl. d°t```• I� :t?� '`" `�- i<! 7.:'.J••� Y•u B •�,,, •r'' �Flha'CY"' i Y:1• h �� 4u•. ---� ;rR• r ., .y <J ��.r-+�,::•�• :,; '"'�> ., a('1 • '' f•4ri-�.,a".p.can 9' .. F ;�,•. �' `jG ` e k ,WX •y� .�""F:' _ PHOTO,-GRAPHIC EXISTING BOILER SIDE VIEW �� �. K if '� "" s Y OF NEIAi BOILER ARRANGEME51 NT' M HOtlll LMM klf p„ APPUHD VTHlrY HYH FID�9.IND. q icroK AND uicH nloro HrNOH10H! MAD "�' ar D 606-M-SO A r ,�o14 ulafn nam i. 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Attachment No. 3 Project .Narrative Environmental Checklist 25 EA 00-09 AES Huntington Beach Generating Station Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Installation Project- Narrative AES Huntington Beach, LLC (AES) proposes to install Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) at Huntington Beach Generating Station's Units 1 and 2. SCR will be used to reduce nitrogen oxide (NO,,) emissions as part of AES' plan to meet the declining facility-wide NO, emission allocation limits required by South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) Regional Clean Air Incentives Market(RECLAIM)Program. The Huntington Beach Generating Station property is approximately 23 acres (1,001,880 square feet) and operates 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. , The Generating Station currently employees approximately 25 employees full-time. AES is initiating, permit and review proceedings with the City of Huntington Beach for the proposed project in order to obtain California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, a Coastal Development Permit, a Conditional Use Permit, and Design Review. The proposed project at the Huntington Beach Generating Station consists of the installation of the following components: i • Two SCR Reactor Units: The reactor units will be located in each of the two boiler exhaust ducts between the economizer and air heaters of Units 1 and 2. The units will include the installation of carbon steel assemblies comprised of four reactors, 26 feet long x 19 feet wide x 9 feet high. • Control Equipment: The SCR control equipment would be incorporated in to the existing plant distribution control system with new interface hardware. • Ammonia Source Component. The project uses ammonia as the principal NO. reducing agent. Generation of ammonia will be accomplished in one of two ways. The Preferred Approach is to general ammonia onsite using a Urea-to-Ammonia(U2A) generation process. The U2A system will require installation of a 20 ft. long by 8 ft. wide conversion skid and a 4 ft. long by 5 ft. wide pump skid and will utilize the existing on-site urea storage tanks. Refer to Section IX, Hazards and Hazardous Materials for a complete description of the U2A process. The solid urea will be transported to site every five days during the summer peak months. The Alternate Approach is to utilize ammonia that is transported to and stored on-site. This will require two 10,000-gallon double walled carbon steel tanks that will contain 19 percent aqueous ammonia. The tanks will be installed above ground, in separate containment berms, and on an existing.concrete pad currently occupied by two urea tanks. The urea tanks would be demolished and removed. An ammonia truck unloading facility is proposed immediately adjacent to the storage tanks. The truck facility will be a modification of the existing urea truck unloading facility. Nineteen percent aqueous ammonia will be transported to the site approximately every 7 days during the summer peak months. C:IWINDOMTEMP\NARRATNE.DOC\27.00T-MSDG I AES Huntington Beach Generating Station Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Installation Project- Narrative (cont.) All new equipment will be located within the existing fenceline of the Huntington Beach Generating Station. The SCR Reactor Units will be encased in the existing duct works and will not be visible off-site. All other new components will be installed close to the boiler structures and will also not be visible off-site. A temporary construction laydown area will be located adjacent to Unit 4. The construction of the proposed project will occur between January and April of 2001. An outage, or shut down, of the Generating Station is scheduled to begin February 14, 2001. The SCR system is scheduled to be on-line in May of 2001. The construction of the proposed project will include a crew of approximately 30 temporary tradesmen. Construction equipment will include a boom truck, air tugger, eight pack welding machine and a crane. The operation of SCR requires use, resupply, and/or waste disposal of ammonia and catalyst.No water is required for the aqueous ammonia(Alternative Approach), however the U2A (Preferred Approach) will utilize approximately 1,700 gallons of water per day during peak summer months. No wastewater is generated during normal SCR operation. The catalyst, which is a honeycomb/air filter type of material, contains vanadium, tungsten, and titanium on a non- hazardous substrate. The guaranteed catalyst life is 3 years and requires replacement at the end of its useful life. The entire system will be designed in accordance with all applicable codes and standards. The land uses surrounding the Generating Station include: • North: Industrial, Public, Residential • South: Open Space, Commercial • East: Open Space • West: Residential, Commercial. The proposed project will reduce NO.emissions from Units 1 and 2 at the Generating Station and will benefit the entire population within the South Coast Air Basin. AES declares that the project site is not located within a Hazardous Waste and Substance site pursuant to Section.65962.5 of the Government Code, as verified by Ricky Ramos (City of Huntingt n Beach, Planner). Han Tan,AES Huntington Beach LLC Date C:\WINDOWSITEMP%4k R TNE.DOC127-0CT-MSDG 2 Attachment No. 4 Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local,State,and Federal Fire Codes,Ordinances,and standards: 2. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. 3. If outdoor lighting is included, energy saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage"onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. 4. In accordance with NPDES requirements,a"Water Quality Management Plan"shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer and its recommendations shall be incorporated into the project design. 5. Automatic fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems MAY be required. Fire will need to meet with AES personnel to discuss the entire system. 6. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification 401 Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. 7. Installation and/or removal of flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and HBFD requirements. Certain areas may require conformance to City Specification#431,Gas Fired Appliances. 8. Fire extinguishers shall be installed and located in areas to comply with HBFC standards found in City Specification #424- 9. The quantities of aqueous ammonia will most likely trigger the Cal-ARP program for Hazardous Materials reporting. 10. Fire requires leak detection and alarms systems for any areas involving aqueous ammonia. Systems to be submitted for Building and Safety and Fire Department approval. Mitigation Measures 1. Prior to the first delivery of aqueous ammonia to the site, a truck haul route map shall be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. 2. The haul route shall minimize rail crossings and crossing of busy unprotected intersections. 3. The haul route shall not come within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. 4. Deliveries shall not be en route to the site between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM or between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM weekdays. 5. The haul route shall be resubmitted if suppliers are changed. Environmental Checklist 26 EA 00-09 Responses to Comments Negative Declaration No. 00-09 I. INTRODUCTION This document serves as the Response to Comments on the Negative Declaration No. 00-09. This document contains all information available in the public record related to the Negative Declaration as of Wednesday, December 6, 2000 and responds to comments in accordance with Section 15088 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines. This document contains six sections. In addition to this Introduction,these sections are Public Participation and Review, Comments, Responses to Comments, Errata to Negative Declaration No. 00-09 and Appendix. The Public Participation section outlines the methods the City of Huntington Beach has used to provide public review and solicit input on the Negative Declaration. The Comments section contains those written comments received from agencies, groups, organizations, and individuals as of Wednesday,December 6, 2000. The Response to Comments section contains individual responses to each comment. The Errata to the Negative Declaration is provided to show corrections of errors and inconsistencies in the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration. It is the intent of the City of Huntington Beach to include this document in the official public record related to the Negative Declaration. Based on the information contained in the public record the decision makers will be provided with an accurate and complete record of all information related to the environmental consequences of the project. II. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND REVIEW The City of Huntington Beach notified all responsible and interested agencies and interested groups, organizations, and individuals that a Negative Declaration had been prepared for the proposed project. The City also used several methods to solicit input during the review period for the preparation of the Negative Declaration. The following is a list of actions taken during the preparation, distribution, and review of the Negative Declaration. 1. An official thirty (30) day public review period for the Negative Declaration was established by the City. It began on Thursday,November 2, 2000 and ended on Friday,December 1, 2000. Public comment letters were accepted by the City of Huntington Beach through Wednesday, December 6, 2000. 2. Notice of the Negative Declaration was published in the Huntington Beach Independent on Thursday,November 2, 2000. Copies of the document were directly mailed to adjacent property owners, agencies, groups, organizations, and individuals. ATTACHMENT NO. s•_3s 3. A copy of the cover letter and the distribution list is available for review and inspection at the City of Huntington Beach, Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. III. COMMENTS Copies of all written comments received as of Wednesday, December 6, 2000 are contained in appendix A of this document. All comments have been numbered and are listed on the following pages. All comments from letters received have been retyped verbatim in a comment-response format for clarity. Responses to Comments for each comment which raised an environmental issue are contained in this document. IV. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The Negative Declaration No. 00-09 was distributed to responsible agencies, interested groups, organizations, and individuals. The report was made available for public review and comment for a period of thirty days. The public review period for the Negative Declaration established by the City commenced on November 2, 2000. Copies of all documents received as of December 6, 2000 are contained in appendix A of this report. Comments have been numbered with responses correspondingly numbered. Responses are presented for each comment which raised a significant environmental issue. Several comments do not address the completeness or adequacy of the Negative Declaration, do not raise significant environmental issues, or request additional information. A substantive response to such comments is not appropriate within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Such comments are responded to with a "comment acknowledged" reference. This indicates that the comment will be forwarded to all appropriate decision makers for their review and consideration. Responses to Comments Negative Declaration No. 00-09 AES Huntington Beach Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Reduction Comments were received from the following parties: AES Huntington Beach, LLC.; Huntington Beach Environmental Board; Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association; Huntington Beach Coastal Communities Association; Mr. Richard Loy; the County of Orange Planning and Development Services Department; and the Department of Toxic Substances Control. AES-1: Comment: As you know, AES Southland,L.L.C. (AES), is proposing to install Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR) on Units 1 and 2 of its power generating station located in Huntington Beach, California. This project is designed to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOJ emissions from this facility as part of AES' plan to meet the declining facility-wide NO,,allocation limits required by South Coast Air Quality Management District's Regional Clean Air Incentives Market(RECLAIM) Program. The Environmental Assessment prepared for this project(City of Huntington Beach Environmental Assessment No. 00-09, October 27, 2000), evaluates two possible approaches for supplying the ammonia that serves as the reducing agent used in these SCR units. Under the "Preferred Approach"ammonia would be generated on-site on an"as needed"basis using a urea- to-ammonia("U2A")process. Under the"Alternative Approach," 19 percent aqueous ammonia would be transported to and stored at the facility for use directly in the SCR units. Response: The comment consists of a description of the proposed SCR system for project identification purposes; no further written response is necessary. AES-2: Comment: In Section IX. of the Environmental Assessment,titled"Hazards and Hazardous Material," it is noted that AES was in the process of pilot testing the U2A technology to confirm its suitability for use at the Huntington Beach facility. AES is pleased to inform the City that this pilot testing is now complete and that, based on such testing, a U2A process can be implemented as a reliable alternative to using aqueous ammonia in the SCR units. Therefore,consistent with the statements made in the Environmental Assessment, AES is committed to utilizing this U2A technology in conjunction with its installation of SCR on Units 1 and 2 at the Huntington Beach Generating Station. ATTACHMENT NO. s-37 . Response: The comment by the project proponent amends the Project Description of Environmental Assessment No. 00-09 by deleting the Alternative Approach as a method of generating ammonia. Therefore,references to the Alternative Approach will be deleted in the Errata. AES-3: Comment: As noted in Section IX. of the Environmental Assessment, implementation of a U2A process eliminates all of the risks that are associated with transport and storage of aqueous ammonia. As further noted in the Environmental Assessment,there are no inherent risks associated with the transport, storage and use of urea. Thus,use of the U2A technology at the facility means that there will be no significant environmental impacts resulting from this project. Response: The commitment by AES to utilize the U2A technology amends the project description and the discussion in Section IX regarding Hazards. Therefore,references to the Alternative Approach will be deleted in the Errata. AES-4: Comment: Previously,the City had proposed requiring AES to mitigate the risks associated with transport of aqueous ammonia to the facility. Accordingly,the City had proposed issuing a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. However,with implementation of the U2A process, mitigation is not required for this project. In light of this, AES requests the City to consider issuing a Negative Declaration for the proposed project. Response: The commitment by AES to utilize the U2A technology amends the project description,the discussion in Section IX regarding Hazards, and eliminates the need for mitigation measures dealing with the transport and storage of aqueous ammonia. Staff concurs with the comment regarding issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project in lieu of the previously recommended Mitigated Negative Declaration. AES-5: Comment: Thank you very much for your time and consideration. If you have any questions or comments regarding the project please contact me directly at(714) 374-1444. Response: The comment consists of closing remarks;no further written response is necessary. ATTACHMENT NO- s-38 HBEB-1: Comment: The Environmental Board of the City of Huntington Beach is pleased to submit its comments and recommendations on the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration(DMD),No. 00-09, for the installation of nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment at the AES Power Generating Facility, located at 21730 Newland. The Environmental Board discussed the adequacy of the DMD at its regularly scheduled meeting on November 2, 2000. The comments included below were approved by Board action at the same meeting. The following represents the Board's comments: Response: The comment consists of a description of the proposed SCR system for project identification purposes; no further written response is necessary. HBEB-2: Comment: To the extent possible,the mitigated negative declaration should identify the planned transit rout and vehicles to be used for the transportation of the aqueous ammonia that would be required under the"Alternative Approach." The draft mitigated negative declaration provides for approval of the route through the Department of Public Works. Response: Please refer to the comments and responses under AES-2, 3, and 4 above. In a letter to the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, dated December 1, 2000, AES Huntington Beach, L.L.C. (AES)committed to using U2A technology for the proposed project. The applicant has revised the project description and eliminated the proposal for use and transportation of aqueous ammonia. Therefore,no transit route for transport of aqueous ammonia is necessary. HBEB-3: Comment: The Board recognizes that under current regulations,the project would need to file an RMP to comply with CalARP requirements. For this assessment,the Board recommends that, in addition to the closest residential receptor, an impact analysis be conducted for employment receptors, as well as a fence line analysis. Under an acute exposure scenario, individuals can theoretically be walking near the fence line during an accidental release. Response: Please refer to the comments and responses under AES-2, 3, and 4 above. The applicant has revised the project description and eliminated the proposal for use and transportation of aqueous ammonia. Therefore,no storage of aqueous ammonia is necessary and the risk of accidental release is eliminated. i HBEB-4: Comment: Finally,the Board strongly recommends that the Urea to Ammonia Process, "Preferred Approach", be adopted in order to avoid the potential hazards associated with aqueous ammonia transport, as well as accidental release scenarios. Response: Please refer to the comments and responses under AES-2, 3, and 4 above. The applicant has revised the project description and eliminated the proposal for use and transportation of aqueous ammonia. Therefore, no storage or transport of aqueous ammonia is necessary and the risk of accidental release is eliminated. HBEB-5: Comment: The Environmental Board appreciates the opportunity to comment on the project. Response: The comment consists of closing remarks; no further written response is necessary. SEHBNA-1: Comment: The Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association(SEHBNA)has received your Negative Declaration(ND) for the above mentioned project. Based on the review of the document,the SEHBNA comments are as follows: Response: The comment consists of opening remarks and a description of the proposed Negative Declaration for project identification purposes; no further written response is necessary. SEHBNA-2: Comment: It is not clear from the Environmental Assessment whether the actual SCR system to be installed will be Urea to Ammonia or aqueous ammonia. In the absence of a clear commitment to one method or the other, a Negative Declaration cannot be issued. The aqueous ammonia approach is significantly more hazardous to the surrounding community and would best be evaluated through preparation of an Environmental Impact Report(EIR). The issuance of a Negative Declaration before the decision is made as to which system will be used is premature. ATTACHM NO. Response: The Environmental Assessment commits to using Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR) technology as the method for reducing nitrogen oxides (NOJ at the AES Huntington Beach Generating Station. The SCR system utilizes ammonia in a catalyst to reduce NO,, emissions by at least 90 percent. The SCR system functions the same regardless of the method of obtaining ammonia for the system. Urea to Ammonia(U2A) and aqueous ammonia were evaluated in the Environmental Assessment as two methods of obtaining ammonia for use in the proposed SCR system. Please refer to comments and responses in AES-2,3, and 4 above. In a letter to the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, dated December 1, 2000, AES Huntington Beach, L.L.C. (AES) committed to using U2A technology for the proposed project. Thereby, aqueous ammonia storage and transportation would not be required. SEHBNA-3: Comment: SCR systems emit ammonia and the catalysts from SCR systems may have to be disposed of as hazardous waste. The impacts of ammonia emissions on the surrounding community have not been addressed in the Environmental Assessment. According to studies at Lehigh University (Bethlehem, PA), SCR can cause undesirable side effects such as ammonia slip, enhanced production of S03, and high gas side pressure drops. An EIR should be required to address these and other concerns that are not adequately addressed by the Environmental Assessment. Response: SCR catalysts have a useful life of at least 3 years. After exhaustion of the catalyst,the modules will be disposed of according to federal, state, and local regulations, offsite in an appropriate disposal facility. The components of the catalyst modules that would be disposed would likely be considered a hazardous waste due to the metal content of the ceramic substrate. The SCR system to be installed at the Huntington Beach Generating Station is comprised of state-of-the-art NO.removal technology. AES is installing the SCR systems on Units 1 and 2 to significantly reduce (i.e. over 90 percent per unit when comparing historical to post-SCR emissions)the emissions of NO.. This will have a positive overall effect on the air quality in the surrounding area, as described in detail below. Ammonia Slip The SCR systems engineered for Units 1 and 2 will inject ammonia into the boiler exhaust stream. Through a chemical reaction,the ammonia injection will decrease emissions of NO,,into the atmosphere, as NO,,is decomposed into harmless NZ and HZO. During this process, a small amount of the ammonia is emitted directly into the atmosphere. These emissions are commonly referred to as `ammonia slip'. ATTACHMENT NO. s - I In terms of`undesirable side effects', ammonia is a compound for which ambient air quality standards have not been established,but is known or suspected to cause short-term(acute) and long-term(chronic) adverse human health effects. In the air permit application for the SCR installation provided to the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD), an inhalation human Health Risk Assessment was performed to calculate the potential acute and chronic non-carcinogenic health effects of ammonia slip expected from Units 1 and 2. To perform the Health Risk Assessment, a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- approved model was used,with conservative model inputs. The ammonia slip concentration used in the model, as per engineering design specifications, was 10 parts per million(ppm). This is the anticipated limit that the SCAQMD will place on Units 1 and 2 in the Permit to Operate. Note that AES will be required to conduct stack testing on an annual basis to confirm that the ammonia slip limitation is not exceeded. Also note,for perspective purposes,that 10 ppm ammonia is well below the Occupational Safety& Health Administration(OSHA)recommended occupational (direct) exposure limit of 25 ppm. The Health Risk Assessment model predicted that the acute and chronic health risk levels associated with ammonia slip were significantly less (by a factor of over one hundred times)than the acceptable level for the chronic and acute hazard indices. From these results, it can be concluded that there will be no adverse health effects associated with ammonia slip from the operation of the SCR units on Units 1 and 2. Enhanced Production of SO3 There is a potential for the formation of sulfur trioxide (S03)resulting from the combustion of natural gas, which contains sulfur compounds in trace quantities. While most of the trace fuel sulfur is converted to sulfur dioxide (S02), approximately 1.5 percent is converted to S03. It is expected that no S03 will actually be emitted, as it will likely react in the flue gas to form a particulate. The emission rate of sulfur-based particulate is an un-quantifiably small quantity that would be furthermore diluted and dispersed before reaching ground level. Therefore, `S03 production' is not expected to be an environmental issue of concern for this pollution control project. There is no `enhanced production' of S03 as a result of implementing an SCR system in a gas fired boiler;the source of sulfur comes from the fuel (natural gas), not the SCR(there are no additional sulfur emissions as a result of using an SCR). Thus if the levels of S03 emitted from an uncontrolled gas fired boiler were compared to the levels of S03 emitted from a gas fired boiler with SCR,the two levels would be the same. It is likely that the studies mentioned above and produced in Pennsylvania refer to coal-fired boilers, as is standard in that part of the country. In the operation of coal fired boilers,there is higher excess air in the combustion process, leading to higher oxidation of sulfur compounds (and the subsequent formation of S03). In gas fired boilers,there is lower excess air in the combustion process, and due to less air as well as a lower fuel sulfur content(see below),the production of S03 is significantly lower. ATTACHMENT NO. 5 .4-2- East Coast coals typically have a fuel sulfur content of 0.8 percent to 2.3 percent, typically around 2 percent. Natural gas has a fuel sulfur content of around 0.001 percent(by volume). Therefore, as a function of fuel sulfur content,the generation of sulfur oxides (including SOO in the flue gas would be significantly higher for coal fired units than for gas fired units. With the use of coal fired boilers there is the added effect of the use of Electrostatic Precipitation (ESP)to control particulate (fly ash emissions). Two factors relevant to the comment above arise here. First, ammonia may be injected into the ESP in order to enhance capture of fly ash. This leads to ammonia slip (ammonia that escapes the reaction process and is emitted from the stack, the same occurrence as for ammonia slip emissions from SCR systems). In effect,this means that there is a `double' ammonia slip emission from coal fired units that utilize SCR and ESP. This ammonia slip `doubling' does not occur in gas fired units since ESP is not used in gas fired units. Second, the alternative to ammonia injection as a capture agent in ESP is S03. Hence, increased SO3 emissions result from the use of ESP on coal fired units. For comparison,the average full load SOx emission levels (of which SO3 will be a very insignificant component) from a gas-fired boiler without control (i.e. no SCR) are around thirty times less than those from a coal fired unit with some form of control. High Gas Side Pressure Drops Pressure drop limitations are a component of the design of the retrofit SCR system on Units 1 and 2 at the Huntington Beach Generating Station. A safety factor is built into each component of the system design(i.e. there is a safety margin in the design of the pressure drop across the system, a safety margin in each of the structural components, etc)to give an overall SCR design safety factor. This safety factor ensures that maximum design limitations (such as maximum design pressure) are not reached. In addition,the SCR is equipped with sophisticated sensors and control mechanisms that alert operators if maximum pressures are approached, and automatically shut down the relevant operation should a problem arise. Therefore,AES has built in sufficient design limitations and control systems to safely handle all feasible pressure drop scenarios. SEHBNA-4: Comment: The City's Environmental Checklist determined a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. It is unclear from the City's documentation how this determination was made. It is believed there is no one on City staff fully qualified to assess this highly technical project. If no independent evaluation by a fully qualified staff person or consultant was used to arrive at this Mitigated Negative Declaration,then a full Environmental Impact Report must be required to enable complete assessment and mitigation of impacts. In the absence of fully qualified review of this project,the City is simply guessing at the potential impacts and that should not be allowed. In addition, an EIR will permit more thorough public review and comment on the impacts to the community. i Response: The Environmental Assessment that was prepared for the proposed project included technical evaluation by the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department, Hazardous Materials experts. The document was also routed through the State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Research where it was distributed for review to: Air Resources Board, Major Industrial Projects California Coastal Commission California Energy Commission Caltrans, District 12 Department of Fish and Game, Region 5 Department of Parks and Recreation Department of Toxic Substances Control Department of Water Resources Native American Heritage Commission Public Utilities Commission Regional Water Quality Control Board,Region 8 Resources Agency State Lands Commission The City Planning Department performed a thorough review of the environmental and technical analysis, allowing a determination to be made. Therefore,the City proceeded appropriately in processing this document. The City also expanded the review process for the Environmental Assessment by directly mailing the document to numerous individuals and agencies, such as the South Coast Air Quality Management District,the County of Orange, and others with an interest in the project. An Environmental Impact Report was deemed unnecessary due to the absence of significant impacts to the environment. SEHBNA-5: Comment: The Negative Declaration, Page 3,refers to an"earlier EIR or Negative Declaration"that has not been made available for review by SEHBNA. Statements are also made by the City that"the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment,"and that"all potentially significant effects (a)have been analyzed adequately... and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION." In the absence of access to "earlier"documentation that was obviously used to arrive at the current Negative Declaration, SEHBNA has been excluded from the full review process. Either determination that a new full EIR is required or a time extension of this Environmental Assessment review period to allow SEHBNA review of"earlier documentation"must be provided by the City. ATTACHMENT TNO.'*�-- Response: Comment noted. The reference on Page 3 of the Environmental Assessment is referring to one our of five of the possible determinations that the City can make regarding the proposed project. The text referred to in the comment above, however, does not relate to the proposed project, as noted on Page 3 by an"X" adjacent to a determination that does not rely on a previous environmental document. There is no "earlier documentation"used to evaluate this proposed project and thus,that choice or finding has not been checked as applicable by the City. Also, as noted on Page 3 of the Environmental Assessment, the proposed project was determined to potentially"have a significant effect on the environment, [however,] there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures... have been added to the project." The mitigation measures in the Environmental Assessment reduced the potential risks of transporting aqueous ammonia to below a level of significance. However, since AES has committed to using U2A technology,versus aqueous ammonia,the mitigation measures in the Environmental Assessment are no longer necessary. The proposed project utilizing U2A,would not just reduce potential impacts from the transport and storage of aqueous ammonia, but would in fact eliminate such potential impacts entirely, as determined under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Therefore, a Negative Declaration is the appropriate determination for approval by the City. HBCCA-l: Comment: HBCCA wishes to advise the Planning Department of our concern about this proposed work. Although the benefit of reduced emissions from this long-polluting facility is welcome,we wonder more about what's not included. Response: Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. HBCCA-2: Comment: We wonder why AES and the city are considering anything short of a complete replacement of the existing facility. Understanding the great cost and timeframe involved in the design and construction of a new plant,we are dealing with an existing facility which has long past its prime. It is inefficient and costly for AES to operate, even without the recently voted upon sales tax defeat. Additionally,with the recent findings that this plant apparently has a great deal to do with the beach contamination and closings, and with the possibility of redevelopment taking place in this part of town, we can't understand why a new facility shouldn't and couldn't be our FIRST consideration with AES. A new facility makes the most long-term sense. A new plant would be smaller, cleaner, less obtrusive, less dangerous and much more efficient. Response: Comment does not address adequacy of the environmental assessment for the proposed SCR system. Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. HBCCA-3: Comment: But,regarding the specifics of this assessment,we feel that no allowance should be made for the shipment or use of non-urea generation. The shipment and use of 19% aqueous ammonia, while technically below certain triggering concentrations is still an extreme danger to the residents and schools in the area. We feel storing 20,000 gallons of ammonia onsite will be a disaster waiting to happen, not unlike the CENCO tanks being filled with 50,000 barrels of oil. This neighborhood has had enough hazardous materials in our back yard without,a new one being brought in. We must vehemently object to the alternate approach to any degree. Response: Please refer to the comments and responses under AES-2, 3, and 4 above. In a letter to the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, dated December 1, 2000,AES Huntington Beach, L.L.C. (AES) committed to using U2A technology for the proposed project. The applicant has revised the project description and eliminated the proposal for use and transportation of aqueous ammonia. Therefore, no storage or transport of aqueous ammonia is necessary and the risk of accidental release is eliminated. HBCCA-4: Comment: We also have reservations about the preferred method(urea). We recommend that the hours prohibited from transportation be from 6:00 AM to 10:00 AM and from 3:00 PM to 7:00 PM. Deliveries should be banned on weekends and holidays. Additionally, we recommend that transportation routes be prohibited on Newland Avenue north of the plant and Hamilton Avenue. Response: Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. However,urea is not a hazardous material and poses no inherent threat to the community by transport of the material to the site. In addition,the solid urea will be transported to the site approximately every five days during the peak summer months. Furthermore, Newland Street, between Pacific Coast Highway and Atlanta Avenue is a designated truck route in the City's General Plan. The truck route then goes west on Atlanta to Beach Boulevard, a State Highway and therefore, does not travel through residential areas to the north of Atlanta Avenue. Staff maintains that the low frequency of transport trips of a non-hazardous material and on a designated truck route is not considered a significant adverse impact. ATTACH 'IEN ► HBCCA-5: Comment: We have noticed the obvious construction currently taking place at the facility with three or four large cranes and approximately 50 construction workers. We wonder is AES is stating this work in a preemptive strike. There has been no explanation from AES to this organization explaining what is going on there. That does not give us a feeling that they are trying to be good neighbors. Response: Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. Although this comment does not address the adequacy of the Environmental Assessment for the SCR system, the Planning Department notes that AES has submitted a separate application for retooling of Units 3 and 4 to the California Energy Commission. Information regarding the California Energy Commission's application process,procedures, and AES' proposal with a separate web page for Huntington Beach can be found at www.energy.ca.gov. HBCCA-6: Comment: We are curious to know if the burners at this plant have been retrofitted to low NO,,. If not, why not? Shouldn't that be done in conjunction with or instead of this SCR system? Response: The Huntington Beach AES facility does include burners and low NO,burners are present in some facilities where new gas turbines have been implemented. Many older facilities built in the 1950's have not been fitted with low NO,burners. However, SCAQMD does not mandate the specific technology necessary to reduce NO.emissions. Rather,the Air District states a specific limit of how much NO,,may be emitted from power generating facilities. SCR technology was chosen by AES to reduce NOX emissions well below the limits set by the SCAQMD because SCR is a more effective method of NO.control than the low NO,burners. The SCR will reduce NO,, emissions as mandated by the SCAQMD. HBCCA-7: Comment: We also want to know what AES' long term plan is for this plant? What is going to happen to the units that are currently non-functional? Is the state's extreme need for power mean that AES will permanently power up these units to sell their power? What are the pollution and noise consequences from that? What is to happen to the oil tanks currently onsite? Why doesn't the planning commission require AES to remove them as a condition to the approval of this assessment? Response: Comment noted and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. ATTACH EE T NO. s -47 HBCCA-S: Comment: Why are there no requirements being placed on AES to improve the aesthetics of the plant as a condition to approval of this assessment? This has been a long discussion with Edison and now on-going with AES and this city has gotten nothing from it. This should be an absolute requirement. Don't let AES skate by on this one! Response: As discussed in Section XIII Aesthetics,the proposed SCR units will be installed within existing boilers at the facility and will not result in substantial visual alteration of the facility. Additionally, conditions of approval are recommended as part of the associated Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 requiring intensified landscaping, replacement of dead and dying landscaping, and functioning irrigation along the south and east perimeter of the site. Conditions are also recommended to require replacement landscaping along Newland Street at the time of overall street improvements, such as dedication, widening, and new curbs and gutters. HBCCA-9: Comment: Please consider these concerns carefully. Your attention is appreciated. Response: The comment consists of closing remarks; no further written response is necessary. RL-1: Comment: I request the City of Huntington Beach require an environmental impact report to be submitted by AES in regards to the installation of nitrogen oxide emission equipment at the Huntington Beach Power Generating Plant. Response: Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. Staff maintains that the Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of review for the project given the fact that there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposal and that the proposed project will reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from the facility by 90 percent. RL-2: Comment: The local homeowners need to be included in discussions concerning this matter. The City of Huntington Beach has sent out only 40 notices regarding this high impact and serious project. ATTACHMENT NO. �•�S Response: Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. The Environmental Assessment that was prepared for the proposed project included technical evaluation by the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department, Hazardous Materials experts. The document was also routed through the State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Research where it was distributed for review to: Air Resources Board, Major Industrial Projects California Coastal Commission California Energy Commission Caltrans, District 12 Department of Fish and Game,Region 5 Department of Parks and Recreation Department of Toxic Substances Control Department of Water Resources Native American Heritage Commission Public Utilities Commission Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 8 Resources Agency State Lands Commission The City Planning Department performed a thorough review of the environmental and technical analysis. Therefore, the City proceeded appropriately in processing this document. The City also expanded the review process for the Environmental Assessment by directly mailing the document to numerous individuals and agencies, such as the South Coast Air Quality Management District,the County of Orange, and others with an interest in the project, including local homeowner associations. An Environmental Impact Report was deemed unnecessary due to the absence of significant impacts to the environment. RL-3: Comment: An independent study not paid for or associated with AES needs to be provided to the residents of the area surrounding the power generating plant. I request a larger group of homeowners in Southeast Huntington Beach be given the opportunity to have their opinions heard. An EIR report will mandate public hearings. Please include rather than exclude the concerned residents. Response: Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. Please refer to the response in RL-2 Comment above. C C COPDSD-1: Comment: The above referenced item is a Negative Declaration (ND) for the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed project involves he installation of two Selective Catalytic Reduction Reactor Units (SCR)within two boilers at the AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station. The proposed SCR system will be used to reduce nitrogen oxide emission allocation limits required by South Coast Air Quality Management District's Regional Clean Air Incentives Market Program. The AES Power Generating Facility is located at the northeast corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Newland Street. Response: The comment consists of a description of the proposed SCR system for project identification purposes; no further written response is necessary. COPDSD-2: Comment: The County of Orange has reviewed the ND and offers the following comment regarding environmental health: The"Ammonia Source Component"process as described in this project is subject to the California Accidental Release Prevention Program requirements. The program seeks to mandate facilities that store or use in a process certain chemicals, "regulated substances", are subject to this its requirements. Although it is not subject to federal requirements,the described process is captured by the requirements of the California program. This program within the City of Huntington Beach is administered by the fire department. Please contact the Huntington Beach Fire Department for requirements of the California program and guidance prior to commencement of this project. Response: The comment is acknowledged. The City of Huntington Beach Fire Department has reviewed the Draft Negative Declaration as well as the conditional use permit and coastal development permit requests. COPDSD-3: Comment: Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the ND. If you have any questions,please contact me or feel free to call Charlotte Harryman directly. Charlotte may be reached at(714) 834-2522. Response: The comment consists of closing remarks; no further written response is necessary. A I A CA,-f h l E INT N 0. S -5D DTSC-1: Comment: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)has received you Negative Declaration (ND) for the above mentioned project. Based on the review of the document,the DTSC comments are as follows: Response: The comment consists of opening remarks and a description of the proposed Negative Declaration for project identification purposes; no further written response is necessary. DTSC-2: Comment: The ND needs to identify and determine whether current or historic uses at the Project site have resulted in any release of hazardous wastes/substances at the Project area. Response: The major components of the proposed project include installation of: • Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR)reactor units • Control Equipment • Urea to Ammonia(U2A) system. The SCR reactor units and control equipment would be incorporated in to the existing boiler exhaust ducts of Units 1 and 2. The control equipment would be installed within the existing plant distribution control system. The U2A system would be located on impermeable surface and would include a 20 feet x 8 feet conversion skid and 4 feet x 5 feet pump skid. The skids would be located approximately 20 feet south of Unit 1. A Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment for the Huntington Beach Generating Station was prepared for Southern California Edison Company by CH2M HILL in 1997. The Phase II investigation included the area around Units 1 and 2 (Power Block). The site was historically and is currently a power generation station. The Phase II investigation performed soil and groundwater sampling in this area because of the potential for leaks penetrating concrete floors or leaking drain lines resulting in subsurface contamination. DTSC-3: Comment: The ND needs to identify any known or potentially contaminated site within the proposed Project area. For all identified sites,the ND needs to evaluate whether the conditions at the site pose a threat to human health or the environment. A T TACHME T NO. s -5 t . Response: In the Phase II investigation_,the soil and groundwater at the power block area(Units 1 and 2) were sampled and analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons—diesel (TPH-D) and California Assessment Manual (CAM)metals. The results of this investigation concluded that TPH-D and CAM metals were detected at de minimus concentrations in soil. TPH-D was detected at de minimus concentrations and CAM metals were detected above screening criteria in groundwater. The investigation concluded that no further action was necessary and that agency negotiation, additional sampling and/or remediation may be necessary or appropriate as part of the facility decommissioning. The proposed project would not significantly disturb soils, if at all. Therefore,human health and the environment would not be threatened by the proposed installation of surface features (i.e., U2A skids) on the existing impervious surface adjacent to Unit 1. DTSC-4: Comment: The ND should identify the mechanism to initiate any required investigation and/or remediation for any site that may require remediation, and which government agency will provide appropriate regulatory oversight. Response: The mechanism to initiate investigation and/or remediation would be if contaminated soil were encountered. The government agency to provide oversight would either be the Regional Water Quality Control Board or the Orange County Healthcare Agency (OCHA), depending on the location and extent of contamination. DTSC-5: Comment: If during construction of the project, soil contamination is suspected, construction in the area should stop and appropriate Health and Safety procedures should be implemented. If it is determined that contaminated soil exists, the ND should identify how any required investigation and/or remediation will be conducted, and which government agency will provide appropriate regulatory oversight. Response: Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. If contaminated soil were found during construction of the proposed project, the site would be investigated and, if necessary,the contaminated soil would be removed. The government agency to provide oversight would either be the Regional Water Quality Control Board or the Orange County Healthcare Agency (OCHA), depending on the location, source and/or extent of contamination. DTSC-6: Comment: The AES Power Generating Facility is currently on the CalSites list as a hazardous substance site per Government Code Section 65962.5. Response: Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. However,the City's most recent list of Hazardous Substances Site List from the Department of Toxic Substance Control does not include the subject site. DTSC-7• Comment: DTSC provides guidance for Preliminary Endangerment Assessment preparation and cleanup oversight through the Voluntary Cleanup Program(VCP). For additional information on the VCP or to meet/discuss this matter further,please contact Dan Zogaib, Project Manager, at (714)484-5483 or me at (714) 484-5461. ATTACH ENT NO• •s 3 V. ERRATA TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 93-13 The following changes to Negative Declaration No. 00-09 and the Initial Study Checklist are as noted below. The changes to the Negative Declaration as they relate to issues contained within this errata sheet do not affect the overall conclusions of the environmental document other than to eliminate the previously recommended mitigation measures. The changes are identified by the comment reference response. Subsequent to completion and circulation of the Draft Negative Declaration, the applicant revised the original submittal and project description by committing to the Urea to Ammonia process as the proposed method of generating ammonia. Please refer to AES-2,3, and 4 Comments above. The elimination of the 19%Aqueous Ammonia method is not a substantial amendment to the project and will not generate any new or additional environmental impacts not addressed in the original negative declaration. In fact,the new project description eliminates the environmental concerns with storage and transport of aqueous ammonia and thus eliminates the need for mitigation measures regarding hazards. The following revisions to the original checklist are required to address the modified project description. • Project Description, page 2. The project description has been modified to read as follows: "Project Description: AES Huntington Beach, LLC (AES)proposes to install a Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR) system at Huntington Beach Generating Station's Units 1 and 2. SCR will be used to reduce nitrogen oxide (NO,) emissions as part of AES' plan to meet the declining facility-wide NO,,emission allocation limits required by South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD)Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM) Program. The proposed project at the Huntington Beach Generating Station consists of the installation of the following components: Two SCR Reactor Units: The reactor units will be located in each of the two boiler exhaust ducts between the economizer and air heaters of Units 1 and 2. The units include the installation of carbon steel assemblies comprised of four reactors,26 feet long x 19 feet wide x 9 feet high. Control Equipment. The SCR control equipment would be incorporated in to the existing plant distribution control system with new interface hardware. Ammonia Source Component.The project uses ammonia as the principal NO,,reducing agent. Generation of ammonia will be accomplished onsite using a Urea to Ammonia(U2A)generation process. The U2A system will require installation of a 20 ft. long by 8 ft.wide conversion skid and a 4 ft. long by 5 ft.wide pump skid and will utilize the existing on-site urea storage tanks. Refer to Section IX,Hazards and Hazardous Materials for a complete description of the U2A process. The solid urea will be transported to site every five days during the summer peak months. ATTACH EIT NO. �' All new equipment is proposed within the existing fenceline of the Huntington Beach Generating Station. The SCR Reactor Units would be encased in the existing duct works and would not be visible off--site. All other new components would be installed close to the boiler structures and would also not be visible off-site. A temporary construction laydown area would be located adjacent to Unit 4. The construction of the proposed project is anticipated to occur between January and April of 2001. An outage, or shut down,of the Generating Station is scheduled to begin February 14, 2001. Electrical power will continue to be provided to the Huntington Beach community because power is supplied through a grid system for all of California. AES has scheduled the shut down with California Independent System Operator(CALISO), an organization responsible for ensuring available energy throughout the system. CALISO monitors and staggers routine outtages for general maintenance or installation of new equipment so that sufficient power continues to be available to all users within the grid area. The SCR system is scheduled to be on-line in May of 2001. The construction of the proposed project includes a crew of approximately 30 temporary tradesmen. Construction equipment includes a boom truck, air tugger, eight pack welding machine and a crane. The operation of SCR requires use, resupply, and/or waste disposal of ammonia and catalyst. The U2A process will utilize approximately 1,700 gallons of water per day during peak summer months.No wastewater is generated during normal SCR operation. The catalyst, which is a honeycomb/air filter type of material, contains vanadium, tungsten, and titanium on a non-hazardous substrate. The guaranteed catalyst life is 3 years and requires replacement at the end of its useful life. The entire system will be designed in accordance with all applicable codes and standards. • Geology and Soils,page 6 (Items ai-aiii). Delete all references to Alternative Approach and 19%Aqueous Ammonia. • Hydrology and Water Quality,page 8 (Items a j). Delete all references to Alternative Approach and 19%Aqueous Ammonia. Delete the words"Preferred Approach" and replace with"Proposed Project." • Air Quality,page 9 (Items a-e). Delete all references to Alternative Approach and 19% Aqueous Ammonia. Delete the words"Preferred Approach"and replace with"Proposed Project." • Transportation/Traffic,page 10 (Items a-b). Delete all references to Alternative Approach and 19%Aqueous Ammonia. Delete the words"Preferred Approach"and replace with "Proposed Project." ATTACHN!E NT NO. s• ss • Hazards and Hazardous Materials,page 12 (Items a and g). Delete all references to Alternative Approach and 19%Aqueous Ammonia. Delete the words "Preferred Approach" and replace with"Proposed Project." Also, eliminate recommended mitigation measures and amend checklist for Items a), b), and c) from"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated"to "Less than Significant Impact." • Utilities and Service Systems, page 19 (Items a-g). Delete all references to Alternative Approach and 19%Aqueous Ammonia. Delete the words"Preferred Approach" and replace with"Proposed Project." • Mandatory Findings of Significance,page 21 (Item c). Delete all references to Alternative Approach and 19%Aqueous Ammonia. Delete the words"Preferred Approach" and replace with"Proposed Project." • Standard Conditions of Approval,page 26. Delete all Standard Conditions of Approval regarding aqueous ammonia. r • Mitigation Measures,page 26. Delete all Mitigation Measures. ATTACHME T O. s-s i q ATTACHME T O. s ( RF e Mntington Beach, L.L.C. 9gT�F� J?oOO December 1, 2000 011- 10 G9i`N�tic Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: AES Southland, L.L.C.,Huntington Beach Generating Station-Proposed Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR)Installation Project Dear Ms. James: r As you know, AES Southland, L.L.C. (AES), is proposing to install Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR) on Units 1 and 2 of its power generating station located in Huntington Beach, California. This project is designed to reduce nitrogen oxide (NO.) emissions from this facility as part of AES' plan to meet the declining facility-wide NO. allocation limits required by South Coast Air Quality Management District's Regional Clean Airy Incentives Market (RECLAIM) Program_ The Environmental Assessment prepared for this project (City of Huntington Beach Environmental Assessment No. 00-09, October 27, 2000), evaluates two possible approaches for supplying the ammonia that serves as the reducing agent used in these SCR units. Under the "Preferred Approach" ammonia would be generated on-site on an "as needed" basis using a urea-to-ammonia ("U2A") process. Under the "Alternative Approach," 19 percent aqueous ammonia would be transported to and stored at the facility for use directly in the SCR units. In Section IX. of the Environmental Assessment, titled "Hazards and Hazardous Materials," it was noted that AES was in the process of pilot testing the U2A technology to confirm its suitability for use at the Huntington Beach facility. AES is pleased to inform the City that this pilot testing is now complete and that, based on such testing, a 5 . 2- U2A process can be implemented as a reliable alternative to using aqueous ammonia in the SCR units. Therefore, consistent with the statements made in the Environmental Assessment, AES is committed to utilizing this U2A technology in conjunction with its installation of SCR on Units 1 and 2 at the Huntington Beach Generating Station. As noted in Section IX. of the Environmental Assessment, implementation of a U2A process eliminates all of the risks that are associated with transport and storage of aqueous ammonia. As further noted in the Environmental Assessment, there are no Are;,- 3 inherent risks associated with the transport, storage and use of urea. Thus, use of the ; U2A technology at the facility means that there will be no significant environmental impacts resulting from this project. 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax(714)374-1495 ATTAC E T .NOS 5' S� Previously, the City had proposed requiring AES to mitigate the risks associated with transport of aqueous ammonia to the facility. Accordingly, the City had proposed issuing a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. However, with implementation of the 4 U2A process, mitigation is not required for this project. In light of this, AES requests the City to consider issuing a Negative Declaration for the proposed project. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. If you have any questions or comments regarding the project please contact me directly at(714)374-1444. AE�5 S Best Regards, AES SouthlandaL.L.C. Ed Blackford President, AES Huntington Beach,L.L.C. LACSD SW/0 a M Fax:5629089572 Dec 6 '00 3:54 P.02i05 C!1•Y OF HUNTINGTCN BEACH HLWiNGTUNBFACH Post Office Box 190 - Huntington Beach, CMIfurnia7. W648 December 4,2000 Ms,Jane James,Associate Planner City of fTuntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street,3d Floor Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Subject: Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No.00-09(AES Power Generating Facility) Dear Ms.James, The Environmental Board of the City of Huntington Beach is pleased to submit its comments and recommeadations on the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration(DMiD), No.00-09,for the installation of nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment at the AES Power Generating Facility,located at 21730 Newland. The Environmental Board discussed the adequacy of the DMD at its regularly scheduled meeting on November 2, 2000. The comments included below were approved by Board action at the same meeting. The following represent the Board's comments: • To the extern possible,the mitigated negative declaration should identify the planned transit route and vehicles to be used for the transportation of the aqueous ammonia that would be required under the"Alternative Approach." Z The draft mitigated negative declaration provides for approval of the route through the Department of public Works. • The Board recognizes that under current regulations,the project would need to file an RMP to comply with CalARP requirements. For this assessment,the Board recommends that,in addition to the closest residential receptor,an �gEg 3 impact analysis be conducted for employment receptors,as well as a fence line analysis. Under an acute exposure scenario,individuals can theoretically be wallcing near the fence line during an accidental release. • Finally,the Board strongly recommends that the urea-to-Ammonia Process, "Preferred Approach",be adopted in order to avoid the potential hazards .4 associated with aqueous ammonia transport,as well as the accidental release scenarios. ' ATTACHIIAE NT N0. 15-(eo LACSD SW/0 & M Fax:5629089572 Dec 6 '00 8:55 P.03iO3 Ns.Jane Zam_es 'necember 6,2000 The Enviromtental Board appreciates the opportunity to comment on the project 5 Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD Frank R. Capon Chaimm r 2 ATTAGHME T O. s• (P I 12/01/2000 15:11 714-962-3416 SCOTT BUSINESS ASSOC PAGE 01 Southeast Huntin too Beach Neighborhood Association 22032 Capiun=Lane_Hunt nston Beach.CA 92646-8309. wc�vw.celsbna.orp Phone:(714)962-1746 Fax:(714)962-1745,eared:selr saC�soral.rr.cam December 1, 2000 SENT VIA FAX: (714) 374-1544 Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE AES POWER GENERATION FACILITY -- (PROJECT), Huntington Beach Planning Department Environmental Assessment 00- 09 Dear Ms. James: The Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association (SEHBNA) has received 5EH ep N A - your Negative Declaration (ND)for the above mentioned Project. Based on the review of the document, the SEHBNA comments are as follows: 1. It is not clear from the Environmental Assessment whether the actual SCR system to be installed will be Urea to Ammonia or aqueous ammonia. In the absence of a clear commitment to one method or the other, a Negative 6SR e)t4A- Declaration cannot be issued. The aqueous ammonia approach is significantly ?- more hazardous to the surrounding community and would best be evaluated through preparation of an Environmental impact Report(EIR). The issuance of a Negative Declaration before the decision is made as to which system will be used is premature. 2. SCR systems emit ammonia and the catalysts from SCR systems may have to be disposed of as hazardous waste. The impacts of ammonia emissions on the surrounding community have not been addressed in the Environmental 5�E1P,NA - Assessment. According to studies at Lehigh University (Bethlehem, PA), SCR 3 can cause undesirable side effects such as ammonia slip,enhanced production of S03, and high gas side pressure drops. An EIR should be required to address these and other concerns that are not adequately addressed by the Environmental Assessment. ATT vH BILENT NO. -5•9Z 12/01/2030 15:11 714-962-3416 SCOTT BUSINESS ASSOC PAGE 02 Ms. Jane James, City of Huntington Beach Page 2 December 1, 2000 3. The City's Environmental checklist determined a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. It is unclear from the City's documentation how this determination was made. It Is believed there is no one on City staff fy�y SE WibtA A- qualified to assess this highly technical project. If no independent evaluation by a fully qualified staff person or consultant was used to arrive at this Mitigated Negative Declaration, then a full Environmental Impact Report must be required to enable Complete assessment and mitigation of impacts. In the absence of fully qualified review of this project, the City is simply guessing at the potential impacts and that should not be allowed, In addition, an EIR will permit more thorough public review and comment on the impacts to the community. 4. The Negative Declaration, Page 3, refers to an"earlier EIR or Negative Declaration" that has not been made available for review by SEHBNA. Statements are also made by the City that"the proposed project Could have a SE HBNA- significant impact on the environment," and that°all potentially significant effects (a)have been analyzed adequately... and (b) have been avoided or mitigated s pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION.' in the absence of access to "earlier' documentation that was obviously used to arrive at the current Negative Declaration, SEHBNA has been excluded from the full review process Either determination that anew full EIR is required or a time extension of this Environmental Assessment review period to allow SEHBNA review of "earlier documentation" must be provided by the City. Based on the above, SEHBNA recommends withdrawal of the Negative Declaration t f-vl 6N A - and determination of a requirement for an Environmental Impact Report. (� Ily, ohn F. Scott Chairperson HuNTINGTONBL'AcH COASTAL COMMUNITIESASSOCIATION A wmrnunity-based vrganirAan ded s od to the bettermentof our coastal community ate the familic5 that Iivc there. Demiber 5,2000 To: hie.Jane James,Ilundriston Beach Planning Department Re: Environmental Assessment 900-09(AES Facility) Dear Ms.James: III3Ct'.A washes to advise the Planning Department of our concern about thus proposed work. Although the CCA I benefit of reduced emissions from this long-polluting facility is welcome,we wonder more about what's not included. We wonder why AES and the city are considering anything short of a eornpldc replacement of the wdsting facility, Understanding the great cost and tiraeframe involved in the design and construction of a new plant, we are dealing with an existing Wlitywhich has long past its prime. It is inefficient and costly for ASS to operate,even without the recently voted upon sales tax defeat. Additionally,with the recent findings that this plant apparently has a great deal CCOc-2 to do with the beach contamination and closings.and with the possibility offedeveloptnent taking place in this part of town,we can't understand why a new facility shouldn't and couldn't be our FIRST consideration with AES. Anew facility makes the most long-term sense. A newplant would be smaller,cleaner,less obtrusive,less dangerous and much more efficicrrt. but,regartbg the specifics of this assessment,we feel that no allowance shoLhd be made for the shipment or use of non urea generation. The shipment and use of 19%aqueous amrmnLN while technically below cerlidn triggering concentrations,is still an extreme danger to the residents and schools In the area. We feel storing 20,000 gallons of k?OC Ai-3 ammonia onsite will be a disaster waiting to happen,not unlike the CENCO tanks being filled with 50,000 barrels of oil. This neighborhood has had enough baT,lydous materials In our back yard without anew one being brought in. We must. vehemently object to the alternate approach to any degree. We also have reservations about the preferred method(iuva). We recommend;hat the hours prohitriied froctt transpottaticm be from 6:00 AM to h 0:00 AM and fi om 3.00 PM to 7:00 P,'VL Dehivcrics should bobamlad on weekends 141b CCA-4 and holidays. Additionally,we recommend that transportation routes be prohibited onNewlandAvenue north ofthe plant and Hamilton Avenue. We havo also noticed the obvious construction currently taking place at the facility with three or four largo cranes and approximately 50 construction workers:We wonder if AES is stuting this work in a preemptive strike.Thee }}ACC A-5 has been no explanation fron, AF.S to this organization explaining what is going on there. That does not give us a feeling iha:they are trying to be good neighbors. We are curious to know if the burners at this plant have bocci retrofitted to low NOx. If not,why not? Shouldn't �1�4�t'�A-(v the:be done in conjunction with or instead of this SCR system? We also watt to know what AES'long term plea Is for this plant? What is goingto happen to the units that are currently nott`functionaV Is the state's extremc need for power mean that AES will permanently power up these units to W$tr.CA-7 sell theirpower? What are the pollution and noise consequences from that? W1w is to happen to the oil tanks currently ocrite? Why dooan't the planning commission require AES to remove them as a condition to tho approval of this assessment? Why are there no requirements being placed on AES to improve the aesthetics of the plant as a condition to approval ofthis assessment? This has been a long discussion with Edison and now on-going witli AES and this city bos V}?44A-$ gotten nothing from it. This should bean absolute.requirement. Don't let AES skate by on this oriel 20/10 'd 9L00 599 bU 'ON XV. ONINOIZIGHOO EIV S I N W8 010 11 GOM-90-2a Z Pkase consider these concerns carefully_ Your attention is appreciated JAB C C A-q Very ik y y r141E David Gu' President 21241 LOcItlea Law Huntington Beach,CA 92646 714-536-8695 e-mail; h1t� y�lh2oc cc: Huntington Beach City Council Mr.Ed Blackford,AF;S Huntington Beach BSTMCHIIENT N0. s-es ZD/ZO 'd 9L00 S89 tU 'ON M ONINOI.IIQNO0 NIV S I X W �2,10 KI OOOZ-90-OEC From:v+.t. 714-968-9633 To;Jane)ames Date:12/1/00 Time:5:23:C4 PM Page 1 of 1 1 F. • o ����� � •—may L-3 AT A C- IN' � T N0. �Scse �q sr O THOMAS B. MATHEWS County o Orange DIRECTOR U [rJ 300 N. FLOWER ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA c� Planning & Development Services Department �IFOg�S MAIUNG ADDRESS: . P.O. BOX 4048 SANTA ANA, CA 927024048 QFp `cNT 2000 NCL 00-118 �FP November 30, 2000N�NC Jane James,Associate Planner City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: ND for the Improvements to AES Power Generating Facility Dear Ms. James: The above referenced item is a Negative Declaration(ND)for the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed project involves the installation of two Selective Catalytic Reduction Reactor Units (SCR)within two boilers at the AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station. The CA�DSp_ proposed SCR system will be used to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions as part of AES's plan to meet the declining facility-wide nitrogen oxide emission allocation limits required by South Coast Air Quality Management District's Regional Clean Air Incentives Market Program. The AES Power Generating Facility is located at the northeast comer of Pacific Coast Highway and Newland Street. The County of Orange has reviewed the ND and offers the following comment regarding environmental health: The"Ammonia Source Component"process as described in this project is subject to the California Accidental Release Prevention Program requirements. The program seeks to mandate facilities that store or use in a process certain chemicals, "regulated substances", are subject to this its requirements. Although 2 it is not subject to federal requirements,the described process is captured by the requirements of the California program. This program within the City of Huntington Beach is administered by the fire department. Please contact the Huntington Beach Fire Department for requirements of the California program. This program within the City of Huntington Beach is administered by the fire department. Please contact the Huntington Beach Fire Department for requirements and guidance prior to . commencement of this project. t Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the ND. If you have any questions,please contact CZ?D59 - me or feel free to call Charlotte Harryman directly. Charlotte may be reached at(714) 834-2522. ?j Very truly yours, George Britton,Manager Environmental and Project Planning Services Division r CH l 0I a S�'•.ui'4FJ Department of Toxic Substances Control Edwin F. Lowry, Director Ia.... 5796 Corporate Avenue Winston H. Hickox Cypress, California 90630 Gray Davis Agency Secretary RF Governor California Environmental L'E/1 Protection Agency tiOV 2 FD o18,��� 9?Op0 November 27, 2000o�p41N/NG Ms. Jane James ' City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE AES POWER GENERATION FACILITY (PROJECT), SCH 2O00111004 Dear Ms. James: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has received your Negative Declaration (ND)for the above mentioned Project. DTSC- I Based on the review of the document, the DTSC comments are as follows: 1. The ND needs to identify and determine whether current or historic uses at the 2- Project site have resulted in any release of hazardous wastes/substances at the r Project area. 2. The ND needs to identify any known or potentially contaminated site within the proposed Project area. For all identified sites, the ND needs to evaluate whethe pCSC- 3 conditions at the site pose a threat to human health or the environment. 3. The ND should identify the mechanism to initiate any required investigation and/or remediation for any site that may require remediation, and which U �-4 government agency will provide appropriate regulatory oversight. 4. If during construction of the project, soil contamination is suspected, construction in the area should stop and appropriate Health and Safety procedures should be implemented. If it is determined that contaminated soil exists, the ND should "S. identify how any required investigation and/or remediation will be conducted, and which government agency will provide appropriate regulatory oversight. E pa-NO. 43 . y Jane James November 27, 2000 Page 2 5. The AES Power Generation Facility is currently on the CalSites list as a pTSc- hazardous substance site per Government Code Section 65962.5. DTSC provides guidance for Preliminary Endangerment Assessment preparation and cleanup oversight through the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). For additional information on the VCP or to meet/discuss this matter further, please contact Dan Zogaib, Project Manager, at (714) 484-5483 or me at (714)484-5461. i Sincerely, Greg Holmes Unit Chief Southern California Cleanup Operations Cypress Office I I cc: Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse SCH 2O00111004 P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812-3044 Mr. Guenther W. Moskat, Chief Planning and Environmental Analysis Section CEQA Tracking Center Department of Toxic Substances Control P.O. Box 806 Sacramento, California 95812-0806 ® Printed on Recycled Paper a" ';; ;HI M ENTNO. �� /ar y�i W r �'� f C II CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION _ RECEIVED c To: Connie Brockway, City Clerk DEC 19 2000 E E F PLANNING =' From: . Ralph Bauer, Council Member Geld DEPARTMENT o p�A � Date: December 19, 2000 r, SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVING THE NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS REDUCTION EQUIPMENT IN TWO BOILERS AT THE HUNTINGTON BEACH POWER GENERATOR STATION (AES) — Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49/Coastal li Development Permit No. 00-15/Negative Declaration No. 00-09 (21730 Newland Street) action I wish to appeal the Planning Commission's ton ap rovin . the Nitrogen Oxide pp 9P 9 9 Emissions Reduction equipment in two boilers at the Huntington Beach Power Generator Station (AES) — Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49/Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15/Negative Declaration No. 00-09 (21730 Newland Street) and associated entitlements because: 1. The City Council requires additional information regarding health risks associated with ammonia gas and liquid, including information pertaining to flammability, threshold valves, and time weighted averages with exposure limits. - Additional information should be obtained regarding alternative pollution mitigation options. 2. The pollution reduction proposal needs to be reviewed for adequate desi n 9 safety features, including education of staff, training, safety reviews of units, test readiness, etc. 3. Council has not been apprised regarding the hazards associated with an ammonia reactor failure including vapor cloud plume modeling. 4. It should be determined if development of a spill/leak procedural plan for neighborhood evacuation is required. 5. It should be determined if the current safety controls in place are adequate in the event of a major earthquake. 6. By virtue of this appeal, the Council must approve the Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Reduction System at the Huntington Beach Power Generator Station. RB/MPD/DSO j cc: Mayor and City Council City Administrator Al yW ! . ,,yr+. M + 0+ �,�'7• `�J'rt r y �. 1y1• f 1,��' Sn.��♦ 14 40j,♦ i4.� ��y77 2'aF.,.r v f + , 'r 1♦rf7 / ,�`• + � rf}�� r M Mti i Y tr, �I`�`\ r♦ , ,��J. r�� � � � � is ` Ir ht , �. S,: ...,,. '�, t t S} ';G., fir,',,. ♦ M.k; r ,p ( w `'`,. �'�. .` r / Y. •t. / ` 'I.�� '"^"1AF� IT''. VAF. k. {' � �' ,r•i�t < '�./ ` •;"'.',lh.yl'r/I;}.,Ar1 1 � ,• wo,„♦��. r r . �• 1, �~' , � f1 s '+ �n � ,y��, . M �r�'' � �'`+� ... .1 kiln i�•1 _ /�•. �'. 1+ 1` r I .a� _.�y'1,e.1 •d.F, i�14 %y, ! + it i � \7 4' JJ' . T�,�• �iE`/'+/t' �4'SI ', A'�: P"'jr`•/ /. .� + r.J ♦ �. i1•` � _ y\� Y+1�`� •., /S1.(�'r•yip ,I. 'j ..�, �I�., I' ;`I! I�e I.O7 /i�. I y/ 'I' � I' ,' ��`:f'I ``�'I � .,...♦ 1 I.�Gy Y+' ``y".. ..Y /I/���y.✓ + 't4rY � , Jr,��� `��,�...• .nw. v+l�l,y• \1 ►,lr�Tj�4 ,,♦°N �.1�' i . ;i`�s,� ^`Ij i•. / / ^pi '�Pf ' al�tP� � '.,'. •t`�Z ��� ,�� �ti if �,F.,,rL ��ur �, A. C 1 '�r /� .;1` y�!�1Y♦1'l.+� .+' 1 � 1, �'�r Ij 4' ,/ ,% '1• IJ ,ram• f 6, I;' ' I C" A., . •I I �i j.I".Ili.''.," I r', .I ;I • L ,r` Sit �����,o •� '►. r. /' � ► 4. � "„t(M'?,ter � 'li � ,,�•,,,T� � �1� tA., ••� �1Y I r/. � t /y,�,�,�1J�`(^,,/r,�,�,/\/ ,pIF -�.l;Jidf ,l '/ " i•f �Y��', - _..._-. �, � .... ,,r •.♦ � � �/] � (�'(` � to ! � • A 1 7 ♦ M T 1 f IIDr l':..` r?.•-` � /I �r 4,�i cr '�� �':r' 1 �> t � 11 ��.:-�+wt`�:�w "p t �'i�� � 4' �` ` � r�// /�/t �r` I t1 �, 'yr ' •'� 111 r1 '` 7iswx ��� t �,� L~w ki,rt, f/ �f/# 1 ' 1 1 Fy.,%rryi}i AES HUNTINGTONBEACH SITE LOCATION r. ..rr�rrr�' rr r�r- Project, q•z�•-,v . Q 4 2 LU • U SEWER EJECTION TILUITE PUMPS 0 STATION CAR SHELTER TURBINE - OAS Z SHELTER TRANSFORMERS COMPRESSOR . SHOP$S p p. 1 WAREHOUSELCOOuNO WGR. PARKING Sue PEAKER ADMOL B,DG EXCH�ANG� HYDROGEN 1 U1IPWELL STORAGE SERVICE WATER C ❑❑❑ a❑❑• oHORINATOR R gg TANK PUMP ELM LURE OIL + 4 I AREA UNI . + + a EEE O4Ni.10.SBBi130!FOR DETAILED PLOT PLAN DEMDL — \I SHOVNNO NEWEOUIPMENT INSTALLED IN THIS AREA AREA DIET.", `� . EM } - • • O 0 AREA TANKS DEMIN. WGR. O SWELL OIL SEPARATOR _1NEll BOILER WASH STACK ' AREA OEMIN.�C . VALVE BOX BASIN BOILER WASH RETENTION BASIN ry` A ACID RETENTION BASIN WATER . METER A . ».a r u.wr iJi SCVRRAND US APPLIED Low"BVSTwS.INC. !•� 70086MIN ..now.�..a............�.. nh4a. SRE►GOT►LAM ..�.w.�w...r� J DRAWWC .. Pam,r?.��.+"'� tn• D B6-H-300 A . s 1 1. 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 M 2 1 c� • N 8 7 6 54r 4 13 2 1 LL1 • 11 1/ �1 n i1 I p _ - NOTE: 1) OUTLINE OF NEW DUCT COMPONENTS II n 11 SHOWN IN BOLD � •• NL, I II ( I I " 2) NEW STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN IS PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO FINAL STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. •• ' ' 3) NEW STRUCTURAL STEEL SHOWN AS PHANTOM LINES 4) DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR -- I — BOILERS 1 do 2 1 .p�WINN NNNK i.l a/IIIIN1411p tlNl - O IMP Z'�_ II.OINI lul�lYl M11 -N 11 N •r IIN IngMICIy to"vwI I ' II II M N II N r III�OIAIe YMwo OPIi1.sW I 11 M 1 W-uf_....q ,r...r- I I 14 N • � a I �r-- V II �,� . ,it .•_,,,, I , I I e ' IIN 1NpfW I ' M 1NOgA I —I MI Is(OA I NNM NanIN OInN A ' !� , I ■Nn r u u,lwN �'-iif5 SOVO1uN0 LLS APPUED LnlL7N SYSTEMS,INC. w4ae v.aN• L 1�'elulieieol toaea [tiYATON OILAVARO Or Q © a1Na no+m. O O C' O �:5..-^'^'. e D -X-SO A �N Iaoo uwas w.na 1. 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 T 1 8 7 8 LU DENO N O RELOCATION 0►D \/ EMISRNG STNRS.LEA 0 r - - - - - --- - - - - ---------- 11iKRN4 WPLL II 11 1 1 1 1 11 I I I I 1 I 1 DOS NG ARCH TAW 1.OINDATNN(NOTE 1) • II - - II 4r-6•TO CDnVR ME OF STACK 1 1 -• - r I I Id I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I • 1 I I � 1 1 . 11 11, .. -- - -- - - - - - - - r 2r-3• IO.000 GALLON OOUBtL WAIL SIm TANK(IYP.1) B + + --- --------------- -- I I NEW RETANNO WALL �(,'16C11) -------------- ----- ----__ -----------------1 Inl .Inl NOTES: r 1)SIATABIUTT OI EXISTING PoIDIDATKN TO BE 16•-6 Ve COM►NMEO DURING DUAILEO EII.INECRNG A 1)ALL NEW EWPUENT SHOWN AS BROKEN UNES A �)ALL UMENSIOWL WoftaTKN CONCER16H0 THE TANK w•w sAu�� An SDtRNLAND us SYSTEMS.INC. LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO nNAL ENGINEERING 4)SEE OWO.70606-M-503 FOR AMMONIA , D AMMONIA TANK DRAWNG TANK LOCATION ON SITE. 1 0606-N-SO A ^'"'u'."�'•' w • -Y UM-M STAND I \. t R 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 y. 2y oa 1 N 8 7. 6. 5 4 3 BOILERI UNIT 2 I s s I BOILER UNIT 1 1 �T ( I I 1 1 i!�� NEW ANYONN -3H I MECIION SYM F ^1 NEw CATALYST I s i BED(TIP 2 PERN. I BOROi) I� I I H H I I C (; Nlk VAPORIZATION 24, FAN SKID UNIT 1 1 - (NEW) TS' 6 - ` PEc roll UNIT, 9AflEPoES' (Alm • MCC (NS PlC full UNIT 2 MBA Urt I (NEW)PUPTANK SKID Uq (Set ARG1 n i ~ 2. 1._6.1 P 1• 1G6lhY4 502) DOMI10 STACK UPS Powell f, Mosmounow 2'. A A NOTES: PLOT PLAN SCR AREA �... AM S0U"6ANo APPueo umny aymus,me. 1)SEE OMWINO 20666-M-500 roll SITE FIAT PUN 2ohus ""�"�'�."`r'''•'�`�' w 4W mm PUN/50 AREA 6...-.� Z_ n 0 0 0 -H-50 A . 5��..'-'�'. ' In 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9r2�' - av N Lu 8 7 6 5 4 3wI f Yi r- " r�ky,•. } .. iy.. ef;t:r 9.�y ,s r , :f 7 tti.V,�A��.r �E 1 I! ,�� fjl '�.i5�7 J�'�T�'.I�Nr� �Il��, r'�H••�i, ;•j a ,1.`r:• �'�+.{ifaP •4t, .I ;n. 'r r + r,� iS�ws.fn•pn+r��yk,��y3' t ,.F3FsSsr l D r •}I �4C 6L` 1 4 irk} 3`.. a':w[}�77r tt�;4''Y�,�tf � D 7 4 7'; :xis �`• r M5i!i 1! L�iS s� ii s"[ �k A �n �x ,4 s ' ..C, ,.yQt :i=s t1+.�{, }S sy �'I �Y ,.jl}'• 1 II �c.�t.'bs� I, c I!— ~ � I 'n I a i+rla. ,+ 4' ;�•.1••� � 6 f, , fi .�' r Ci :�C 1 ,.i '.1�s �, r�'yb ! f. si Irt7i.�• _r 1il t'tl° ' � T IT .s �'�,p�S�$�K I .s� Ri, y� I+:t..;�?'•r�� s .._Iy;: ��ir� + t t r 5'trj r 4�1'wi •° ' F .ti t s btu^q 5�_'SI a j„�'� R1. .� Y'' r �7 I ' •�';•+.�rf�t J� li �. � 1 f tC a tY e•�'4 � a. �r '�' l� d lit B \�—f j_ 1 1 � ik'E7� b^ •,� +A it '�iS���xl.�.'-�.�e,.� ' r IF .� r. I ��. -s .� 1 `i�i• ►r '`• `d'd✓ti�''�f�"' � ^�• ti+�` i���Se'jJ.i���i .�:Gl�,fi��••�t�• )������t u+" , :�, "�' j} " 1+ f •��` t "� PHOTO-GRAPHIC RENDITION OF + %.- e�rN- OF NEW BOILER ARRANGEMENT �► :. EXISTING BOILER SIDE VIEW ►; rr' „t��l+r.�`i '" "xr:l � y �`i �'!"`•'"�" ��'� �,�• •1'�; t A N Pius mum.#"us AP 21.urn�ry 1YBt11d8 INa w.aa "L—�7 0 1 1[fORL AND"m Moto .N-SO A • - wr—..w—i� � �r MOOR YM(17 i4I10 /r 1 R 7 6 5 4 3 1 inn,. .. s..a.\.. .. ,,,,,,,.,ii f ... ,tea.,...aS /.. .b, /„ Agntington Beach, L.L.C. JAN 17 2001 January 17,2001 Ms. Jane James Department of Planning City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subj.ct: AES Huntington Beach Units 1& 2 SCR Project Below please find a point by point response to the data requests from Duane Olson of the Huntington Beach Fire Department dated December 28, 2000. Dote that these responses also cover the issues raised by Ralph Bauer in his December 19, 2000 appeal. Assuming our responses meet the needs of Council Member Bauer and Fire Marshall Olson, our understanding is that you will take care of the necessary arrangements to get us on the agenda for the earliest possible City Council meeting. We will work closely with you and others in order to achieve that goal. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 1. Ammonia detection circuits or receptors will be installed at critical locations throughout the facility as determined by the Fire Department. AES will be installing ammonia detection circuits at the two critical locations, which are the reactor tank and the hot air fan skid. Diagrams identifying these locations on a map are included as an attachment to this letter. Should the Fire Department require additional ammonia detection circuits, AES will respond to that request. 2. Video Coverage of the storage tanks, heat exchanger and subsequent piping will be installed. The video coverage will be transmitted to the units operating center and monitored on a 240hour basis. The AES facility has existing perimeter cameras that can cover the urea tanks and the reactor. These cameras are under 24-hour surveillance by the operations staff in the control room. Also note that all operators conduct visual observations of this equipment two times per twelve-hour shift. 3. The automatic warning system alarm shall operate both an audible and visible alarm. Fire protection devices shall be enunciated from a remote location to be determined by the Fire Department. 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 C:IPROGRAM FILESIFIRSTCLASS\DOWNLOADICNIEFOLSON.DOC 1.17.01 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax: (714)374-1495 Mntington Beach, L.L.C. Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Page 2 All warning alarms will be programmed to sound an audible and light a visible alert to the operator on duty, thus making he/she aware of any problem. In addition, serious emergency issues including; over-pressure, over-temperature, and ammonia leakage,will be accompanied by an automatic shutdown as well as an alarm. As the auto-ignition temperature for anhydrous ammonia is 1204 degrees Fahrenheit and there is no mechanism to drive the temperatures in the U2A system that high, additional fire protection devices are deemed unwarranted. 4. A clearly marked and visible emergency shut off device for the reactor shall be located in the control room for operators and responding Fire Department personnel. A hard-wired emergency shut-off button shall be installed both on the skid itself and in the control room. In the event of computer failure, the hardwired switch would be able to start the water cooling of the system,thus stopping the reaction instantaneously. Also the automatic shut off valve located on the top of the reactor would close and bottle up any residual ammonia preventing its release into the piping. 5. Knox box access to the system (location to be determined by Fire Department)for personnel in case of emergency. Comment noted. Knox box access to the system, at a location determined by the Fire department,will be provided. 6.Provide Fire Department apparatus access roads to all parts of the facility, including the tanker off loading area. Comment noted. AES will provide the Fire Department with apparatus access roads to all parts of the facility, including the tanker offloading area. PRIOR TO HUNTINGTON BEACH COUNCIL REVIEW 1. Provide sufficient on site capacity in the event of tank failure(s) or to accommodate a 100-year flood. AES will provide secondary containment for the two urea tanks and U2A reactor. This containment will provide 110%of the total capacity in the event of tank and reactor failure. Additionally, the station's storm drains were modified in 1995 to route all drains to the retention basin prior to discharge. This modification provides a tertiary containment for the urea tanks and reactor. 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 C:IPROGRAM FILES\FIRSTCLASS\DOWNLOAD\CHIEFOLSON.DOC 1.17.01 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax: (714)3714-1495 Mntington Beach, L.L.C. Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Page 3 Should a flood occur in the station,the U2A process will be shutdown by the operator. The tanks and reactor will be contained during the flood. The secondary containment will prevent spread of the urea. Further, the station has an eight foot high earthen berm on its east, south, and west side perimeter of the property. This will prevent an offsite discharge. Lastly, the station is equipped with gate logs in its circulating water system to prevent ocean water from coming in or out of the plant. 2. Identify the type and size of trucks carrying the urea pellets. Dry urea pellets will be delivered to the AES Generating Station in 25-ton loads. The trucks will be equipped with pressurized blowers to prevent fugitive dust during the unloading process. The urea pellets are inert materials and are not considered hazardous under US Department of Transportation regulations. 3. The automatic warning system alarm shall operate both an audible and visible alarm. Fire protection devices shall be enunciated from a remote location to be determined by the Fire Department. See the response to item number 9. 4. Provide additional information regarding health risks associated with ammonia gas and liquid, including information pertaining to flammability, threshold valves, and time weighted averages with exposure limits. Additional information should be obtained regarding alternative pollution mitigation options. Firstly, it should be made clear that AES will not be utilizing aqueous ammonia at the Huntington Beach Facility; the Urea to Ammonia(U2ATM) system will be used as opposed to aqueous ammonia. The U2ATM system does not utilize aqueous ammonia. Therefore the comment as it pertains to liquid ammonia is not relevant, and the following responses will address the health risks of ammonia gas from ammonia slip emissions associated with the operation of the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems. Ammonia slip is defined as the amount of ammonia that flows through the SCR catalyst without being decomposed into either water, carbon dioxide, or nitrogen. An ammonia slip limit of 10 ppm has been established by the SCAQMD in the revised AES Huntington Beach air permit. Health Risks Associated with Ammonia Gas The flammable limits of ammonia in air are 15 to 28 percent(by volume)'. 1 American Gas&Chemical Co.Ltd.website www.amg_as.com 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 C:\PROGRAM FILES\FIRSTCLASS\DOWNLOAD\CHIEFOLSON.DOC 1.17.01 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax: (714)374-1495 Mntington Beach, L.L.C. Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Page 4 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, US Department of Labor (OSHA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) or Time Weighted Average (TWA) for ammonia is 50 parts per million (ppm) (35 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3)). The PEL or TWA is the cumulative average concentration over an eight-hour day, forty-hour week to which a worker can safely be exposedz. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) reference exposure level (REL)TWA for ammonia is 25 ppm(18mg/m3)3 The Immediate Dangerous to Life & Health (IDLH) standard for ammonia is 300 ppm (210 mg/m3). This is the concentration that could be immediately dangerous to life or health, and represents the maximum level from which one could safely escape within thirty minutes4. By comparison, the maximum ground level concentration (i.e., the concentration to which people could be exposed) from the SCR systems at the Huntington Beach Generating Station, as predicted by the Health Risk Analysis,was 0.01706 mg/m3. This concentration is orders of magnitude below the OSHA and NIOSH exposure limits and threshold values. Therefore there would not be any adverse health effects associated with ammonia slip from the operation of the SCR systems at the Huntington Beach Generating Station. Health hazards associated with an accidental release of ammonia are discussed under item # 9 in this letter. Alternative Mitigation Options No mitigation measures are necessary in terms of actually mitigating the ammonia slip emissions, as the concentrations emitted from the stack are, by the time ground level is reached, not at concentrations that will pose a risk to human health. As explained in AES' Authority to Construct Application to the South Coast Air Quality Management District, impacts on human health occur when the hazard indices are 1.0 or greater. The Health Risk Analysis carried out for ammonia slip showed results that were a factor of one hundred less than one; therefore there are no health risks associated with the operation of the SCR. For this reason, no mitigation measures were considered to be necessary in the first instance. 2 National Institute for Occupational Safety&Health website www.cdc.gov/niosh s As for 2 above. 4 As for 2 above. 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 CAPROGRAM FILESIFIRSTClASS1DOWNLOAD�CHIEFOLSON.DOC 1.17.01 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax: (714)374-1495 ntington Beach, L.L.C. Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Page 5 5. Type and size of reactor container shall meet industrial standards for use and operations. The following are the specifications for the reactor: Nat'L. BD NO. 616 Certified by Redman Equipment and Manufacturing Corporation, Torrence, Ca. Year Built: 2000 Shell Tubes MAWP (psi) 300/FV 300/FV @ deg. F 400/70 650/70 MDMT deg. F -20 -20 @ psi 300 300 Test Pressure (psi) 1415 1390 Heat Exchanger Mfg. S/N 0091 Urea Reactor Size: 13/50 x 132 x 217 Type: BKU-2H Item No. E-102 P.O. 58656 The shell was designed to withstand an internal pressure of 300 psi and was pressure tested at 415 psi. Normal operating pressure is 65 psi and emergency shutdown pressure will not exceed 180 psi,well below the limit. 6. Identify compositions of ammonia in reactor,include liquid in gallons and gas in cubic feet. There is no liquid ammonia involved in the process. The contents of the reactor in a full load capacity situation are listed below: • Urea Solution(Liquid in the reactor): 600 gallons at 40%urea and 60%water,this is equivalent to 2000 lbs. of Urea. The solution contains 2.28% free ammonia by volume which is.equivalent to 157 lbs. of ammonia in solution. There is in addition 304 lbs. of the salt, ammonium carbamate, in solution. 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 CAPROGRAM FILES\FIRSTCLASS\DOWNLOAD\CHIEFOLSON.DOC 1.17.01 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax: (714)374-1495 Aintington Beach, L.L.C. Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Page 6 • In the gas space above the liquid surface in the reactor there is 96 cubic feet of space containing ammonia gas, water vapor and carbon dioxide gas. The concentration of ammonia in the gas is 22.7 wt% ammonia. At the operating pressure of 65 psi this is equivalent to 5.31bs. of ammonia. The total amount of ammonia in the reactor is 162.3 lbs. of ammonia, 5.3 of which are in the gas phase occupying 96 cubic feet at 65 psi 7. The pollution reduction proposal needs to be reviewed for adequate design safety features, including education of staff, safety review of units,test readiness, etc. All operators will be trained in the proper operation of the U2A/SCR systems. This training will aid operators to recognize, inspect and correct any deficiencies in the systems. The training will also include the purpose of every system alarms and operating manual will be written outlining proper operation (including startup and shutdown), alarm points, corrective actions for system disturbance, and required testing procedures. The outside operator will inspect the entire U2A/SCR system twice per shift. This involves checking for proper valve arrangements,pressures, temperatures, flows, and overall system integrity. If the operator notes any deficiencies they will immediately contact the control room and the appropriate action will be taken. If the operator notes a serious problem, he/she can immediately shutdown the U2A system locally. The control room operators will monitor all U2A and SCR indications and alarms continuously to ensure they are within proper operating limits. The alarm system will be tested cach shift to ensure it is in working order. If an alarm is triggered in the control room, the operator will immediately review all the indications and take the appropriate action. This action could include shutting the system down,making the controls adjustments, or dispatching an outside operator to the system for inspection. On a semi-annual basis,with the unit out of service, a test of the automatic systems will be made to ensure that all the valves, indicators, sensors, and alarms are in good working order. An actual emergency shut down of the system will be tested annually coinciding with a scheduled shutdown of the boiler. 8. Determine whether the current safety controls in place are adequate in the event of a major earthquake. AES, and the U2A contractors (Wahlco, Hamon Research Contrell, and EC&C Technologies)have contracted with Orchard Power Systems to review the entire U2A system,provide necessary recommendation and design to meet the local seismic code, and 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 C:IPROGRAM FILESIFIRSTCLASSIDOWNLOADICHIEFOLSON.DOC 1.17.01 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax: (714)374-1495 Mnlinglon Beach, L.L.C. Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Page 7 certify all drawings related to civil work with a stamp prior to erection. The study will be completed by 1/31/01. All SCR project equipment will be compliant with relevant seismic codes. 9. Identify the hazards associated with an ammonia reactor failure including cloud plume modeling and neighborhood evacuation distances. At the December 12, 2000 Planning Commission hearing for the Huntington Beach Power Generator Station(AES)Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Reduction Project, the applicant verbally stated that potential ammonia exposures above the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) level of concern of 200 parts per million by volume(ppmv) associated with an ammonia reactor failure would be within 0.1 mile of the point of release. The SCAQMD level of concern of 200 ppmv is equivalent to the Emergency Response Planning Guideline 2 (ERPG2) level, developed by a multidisciplinary committee established by the American Industrial Hygiene Association. The ERPG2 level is the maximum airborne concentration at which a person could be exposed for up to one hour without experiencing potentially irreversible health effects or symptoms which could impair an individual's ability to take protective action. At concentrations below this value, serious injuries as a result of short- term exposures would not occur. Ammonia has good warning properties due to its low odor and irritation thresholds. Studies differ on ammonia odor thresholds,with results ranging from 5 to 50 ppmv. Slight/minor irritation of the nose, eyes, and throat is reported at levels of 72-134 ppmv. Severe upper respiratory tract irritation with adverse effects including coughing and lung damage is reported to occur at a concentration of 500 ppmv. As the attached figure shows, a 0.1-mile impact radius would reach offsite only over Pacific Coast Highway, and to beach parking lots south of Pacific Coast Highway. Thus,no offsite receptors would be exposed to levels above 200 ppmv. The following documentation supplements the applicant's statements made at the December 12, 2000 Planning Commission hearing. The maximum on-site storage of ammonia in the U2A ammonia reactor is 200 pounds,which would be entirely in vapor form. The RMP*COMPTM (version 1.06)was used to assess plume dispersion from a worst-case release involving the U2A ammonia reactor. Guidance prepared by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for emergency release modeling in Risk Management Plans (RMPs) (Risk Management Program Guidance for Offsite Consequence Analysis,Document EPA 550-B-99-009, April 1999) states that RMP*COMPTM can be used to assess potential impacts from an emergency vapor cloud release. The RMP*COMPTM model was developed by the USEPA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA)to provide offsite concentration estimates for 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 CAPROGRAM FILES\FIRSTCLASS\DOWNLOAD\CHIEFOLSON.DOC 1.17.01 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax: (714)374-1495 Mntington Beach, L.L.C Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Page 8 RMPs. RMP*COMPTM employs the required conservative assumptions of the USEPA's Risk Management Program for a worst-case release scenario, including: • A non-buoyant, ground-level release • Emission of the entire vapor-phase contents of a vessel over a 10-minute period • Wind speed of 1.5 meters per second (a low wind speed favoring poor dispersion) • Atmospheric stability in the very stable "F"category(favoring poor dispersion). A 10-minute release time is accepted as conservative by the USEPA for most emergency venting situations since these typically occur as a result of a leak,thereby restricting flow of the toxic gas through a small opening. In the case of the U2A reactor,this presents a far more reasonable release scenario than assuming an instantaneous large rupture of the reactor vessel itself. The reactor will be designed to hold potential process overpressures and to withstand a maximum creditable earthquake,but should a leak occur from such causes, it is likely to be a pipe break or a break at a coupling, creating a small opening. In addition, since the ammonia vapor in the U2A reactor will be hot and pressurized, there should be an initial dispersion of these vapors that a non-buoyant, ground level release assumption would not account for. The above USEPA guidance document states that the RMP*COMPTM model overstates actual impacts under most circumstances, and provides that more refined modeling methods could be used, if necessary,to assess potential impacts. Under the above worst-case meteorological conditions, the estimated distance to a toxic endpoint of 0.14 milligrams per liter of air(mg/L), equivalent to the SCAQMD level of 200 ppmv,was calculated to be 0.1 mile for a worst-case release of 200 pounds of vapor-phase ammonia. The attached output from this RMP*COMPTM run presents this result. A significant impact would be one that exposes residences or other permanent receptors to concentrations of 200 ppmv or more. There are no residences or permanent receptors within 0.1 mile of the release point. Thus, an accidental release of the maximum amount of ammonia present in the U2A ammonia reactor vessel will not present a significant offsite consequence. Note that the U2A system designed for the Huntington Beach Units 1 &2 NOx control project does not trigger state or federal accidental release/risk management plan requirements. Federal rules are triggered if on-site ammonia storage concentrations exceed 20% and the total amount of ammonia stored,by weight, exceeds 20,000 pounds. California Accidental Release Program (CalARP) requirements are triggered if the amount of ammonia stored on-site exceeds 500 pounds. As none of the above regulatory programs are triggered, the AES facility is exempt from compliance with the Risk Management Plan(RMP) guidelines, including offsite consequence analysis modeling such as that provided above. It is important to note however that the results of the analysis presented above would be in full compliance with risk management plan requirements even if they were applicable. 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 CAPROGRAM FILESIFIRSTCLASSIDOWNLOADICHIEFOLSON.DOC 1.17.01 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax: (714)374-1495 Agntington Beach, L.L.C. Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Page 9 10. Provide training and equipment for employees on site in the event of a leak or spill. AES currently provides annual training and the necessary equipment for its employees to respond in the event of a leak or spill. The spill response program will be modified as appropriate to cover the new equipment and materials associated with the new SCR system. 11. Mitigation Hazards at the AES and SCR units. Provide plans for process controls, education of staff,training, safety reviews,test readiness review, etc. In addition to the relevant description already provided under item# 7,the following table summarizes the major process control action based on various abnormal system conditions. ACTIVE CONTROLLER ALARM DESCRIPTION SETPOINT MODES LATCH ACTION LOW FEED TANK LEVEL 1000 gal F,H,R,I,F,N Yes Energize Common Trouble, Prevent pump(s)from running HIGH FEED TANK LEVEL 5500 gal F,H,R,I,F,N No Alarm LOW REACTOR LEVEL 21 inch F,H,R,I,F,N Yes Alarm LOW REACTOR LEVEL DI(19") ALL Yes Energize Common Trouble, Switch system into Normal Shutdown HIGH REACTOR LEVEL 33 inch F,H,R,I,F,N Yes Alarm HIGH HIGH REACTOR 31" ALL Yes Energize Common Trouble, LEVEL Switch system into Fast Shutdown LOW REACTOR 10 psig R,I Yes Alarm PRESSURE HIGH REACTOR 120 psig F,H,R,I,F,N Yes Alarm PRESSURE HIGH HIGH REACTOR DI(180 psig) ALL Yes Energize Common Trouble, PRESSURE switch system into Fast Shutdown mode HIGH REACTOR TEMP. 325 DegF F,H,R,I,F,N Yes Alarm HIGH HIGH REACTOR DI(340 DegF) F,H,R,I,F,N Yes Energize Common Trouble, TEMP.(DI) Switch system into Fast Shutdown LOW COOLING WATER Digital F,H,P I,F,N Yes Alarm,Prevents from going PRESSURE into heat mode 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 6PROGRAM FILES\FIRSTCLASS\DOWNLOAD\CHIEFOLSON.DOC 1.17.01 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax: (714)374-1495 Mntington Beach, L.L.C. Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Page 10 ACTIVE CONTROLLER ALARM DESCRIPTION SETPOINT MODES LATCH ACTION REACTOR LEAKING 280 DegF&20 F,H,R,I,F,N Yes Energize common Trouble, psig switch system into Fast Shutdown NOTES: MODES:F=FILL,H=HEATING,R=READY TO INJECT,I=INJECTING,F=FAST SHUTDOWN,N=NORMAL SHUTDOWN. DI: Indicates the signal is a digital input to PLC and the setpoints.are set in hardware. In addition to automatic process control and safety guards, the following are a list of mechanical and hard-wired safety device back-ups. • In the event of an over-pressure the Fast Shutdown will be initiated from a separate device(pressure switch) on the reactor to shutoff steam supply to the reactor. In addition, there is a pressure relief valve set @275 psi on the liquid side of the reactor. It will release the liquid solution in the reactor into the feed tank to cool down the solution, stop ammonia generation and trap the free ammonia. There is also a backup manual relieve valve as well in case of a pressure relief valve failure. • There are automatic as well and manual block valves both on the ammonia line discharged from the tank vessel and the steam lime. • There is a capacitance switch back up to the differential pressure level control in case of a hi-level alarm. • There will be an emergency stop switch that starts the cooling water and bottles up the reactor hard-wired to the control room and on the skid. 12.If the automatic controls fail, identify the manual mode operation back up for the system. If the automatic mode of operation fails there is a manual mode of operation that can be controlled from the DCS making all modes of operation available to the operator: Fast Shutdown,Normal Shutdown,Fill,Heat,Ready to Inject,Inject and Stop modes. In case of manual mode failure in the DCS,there are manual and mechanical back-up safety devices described in item 11. 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 UPROGRAM FILESIFIRSTCLASS\DOWNLOAD\CHIEFOLSON.DOC 1.17.01 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax: (714)374-1495 Mntington Beach, L.L.C. Ms. Jane James City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Page 11 13 Nitrogen oxide emissions are to be monitored on a daily basis for SCAQMD mandates. NOx emissions are currently measured on a continuous basis and this requirement will be maintained by the SCAQMD following SCR installation. 14. An AES sponsored tour for Fire Department personnel of a system SCR unit. This request was completed on January 9`" during the AES sponsored tour of the SCR unit at the Alamitos Generating Station. 15. Prior to operation, Fire Department is required to be on site to witness, review, comment, and recommend required remediation measure prior to approval of SCR unit operation. Comment accepted. AES will work cooperatively with the Fire Department to initiate this activity. 16. At the discretion of the Fire Department, a third party review of the SCR unit safety features may be required. Cost associated with the review, evaluation, and recommendations would be the responsibility of AES. If the Fire Department decides to contact a third party to review the SCR unit safety features, both parties (AES and the Fire Department) must mutually agree on the consultant. The cost will be shared between the two parties. We look forward to working with you and others to resolve these issues. Sincerely, Ed Blackford AES Huntington Beach, LLC 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 C:IPROGRAM FILES\FIRSTCLASS\DOWNLOAD\CHIEFOLSON.DOC 1.17.01 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax: (714)374-1495 J4 �..,r ay.� ..,. �JI."_• -• 1 i `� s 'S 1.Y4`: P F lr � r a ,S- __�. r il,�;' P 5;. a r T `i.� � 1'"'rn.,cSJ- � � •*, II .. h,�t '� + '� �" � r(J�' � •y,�, �'ti I tl:y � ra'', x t ,>"' '', II a s_ y t� d � �' S �l-. i��,�a�i� / • I �� °r _ k :Y �•: at r. ry � x,{� a�„�ru x k! �' I .����� ill I'' � .� a e - - I I y � '� 7 � rr t _wv i 1 ■ 1I��6�� � 1 ,L r?+L ''.it ���¢' 1!, - k ':p Cl 1 -51 r r I I K • I `(, UZ[/} 1 '��+ ,1\ v'/ ,t'r r .. n -'q p I •t O 00 �,. r.y. n - ? '�Y•'(•. la` .9e'. „� T � 114 f� � 1 - a .' y � �i-ta 1 � f na-�'.„e.. Y « J . t a c 7.:'t•rr1 'i R. kz.,,x ... 't+-x..'uS' }4 �,tl:.t-- ue :art .,c'r 4F-J +, w p4 r^, �. •i f -�I •( //)l'� #a A !-� a y7 (Q P Jw�a yy;4 4 I ,.•.:: .. `:?R t. u.,:� f LS Y G� ' SSMII• ffi j T { !� ...... 'r + x h, CL ,: ,. I t .� � I -- � �.lt! •, •�/ ,s - fit , g _ �1 �' i `r:_r ,1*•' II i EW R1 �l4j_.,: .}Q• rfoo `�,k ,t �•':� r{. ! �....V�y� - * y ,'1� y. = LJ.. �i' 4 t R ' �t /V/� ,sty, 4) W VJ /F,11i 9 t-� 4F Il al yr�jX�'*' .,r + �,- J•. J!-..; l� '. r 5} I.. - t5 '{ a - �` `•rt - �_ /W/ Q (V r (r i � t � I I I Y.� 1 �- � N � ?f rr 4•i 'V � .. ` G •' � L/.. M1� C tl. �q;y tr 17� <'. �a I t� t�.J ?(«, �... �� • r �" j�4S d .'r •�" "-��"!`Tr �- ,'�-.aV.a '��1 � � � E G C �+ ^� G �aE >.�"r <9 t::r.�r Id t �., t •. ••q I '� ,� q'1.*,,. t. �•� ;y -`P! r �• nt °.-Tr ; T• a r.• Ic r I �.I �'' C � m "'. RJR!:, � �� i' ��'`'�'.'j,�.•�.� � ti4: S, � r ':T: ���l r x �. � * I w �: .j,:l I 1-v::y M N �.r %'��:'� � � C l0 17 3ia I {" � !1 r 1 r , R• s` a4 y:. s j f a ;,-4�a- y � � / � I- 7 � r L• ! at,e 9 r,r� �''' di ?7Z C ^n i , j>nr/�Ra}•l �t'il'J vrt4 \V 0 ._ y _ •_ r< r > h� .+ ¢ y y�. �- .,.w-t t.. >. ♦ "7 r vl r La 7 q{ au:.. 0 ++ ga •- �!yti _ '�n� c� '{° '! '"� '� "q''S''#- � :.w ^ fl.V `, yet I a „ F,:hf1Kt5"'aak..a. S°� rid ct �� _ ,r.-f.!!/ t' y �}*5 s.jF a t+ }.A,• � 2' }-'+��'. ry :. .+ -r "*a ,,� ,-. �''`1 1 r.: � C Y ♦+`�Vd :- r .r, ' ! ez$ *, t.`..V t ': ,''_I; Jf >�(; f l f !�±�. '}, �.,,Fn 1 +. `"�•�r.' Ar r• . t H J.7- »_,.- .� vI 'iq �4 1 r ,4 r T i ;iP'! a��, f �~ �r ?x�'F ` fi,tA� �T ., .•^ r,..+lA:r y„ ��"fi }y. I f a O 4 m by {yp u�j;'.� r! yl1 �.'Ct', «t a4p .� / j�V! � 'Y�+ t .ra A y' a� ?k ,yam r �1 a'y+ r r t•7ra�� l.t1,a � (a � ♦Y a a at d R, •, 'k Rk. A' ` F♦ , } w,w .Mi t 1'.. t«lhaL r ♦ter' i I.C.Sp t✓1'rt"� Y l.. k .J ..r 'y5,1-, � •� �" V' �{I^6 b-s P'ti a+35,r,+ {, •IK{ a . .� :f' C .. ri 5. a A.jF.F "r 4 t p t �i y 4a r w.'1 a a " J+ k ' v r'$+a f a r?k r�N �S«1# !7 ° lF' O d 'I�Jr • ..--_-^�� b +R `_ r't �.r -+'a m .+-yr X t'Q s+ J r I _ • i<D fN V7 n._. .� �►'S b t t h 14rA a 5 tµ' •r r.t'kl r r •Fr 14i `'°Iiy�r• r' •X '�� '!'• `'� �' I �, "�'1 � N •, I ;. � , •a j L'i e y e r ;! � ^, — -a.3 r ., r.r n,ti. .. ^'e ,."� V `V-. ��J ar ` ✓�` r'ff �'�"' spa + { ; / u n r 1+ `q_ CO 5 4, t.!' Cl) G, �} ,,. �• .. � _' � l' S f !Cr f"+n I"c-i°..� R ''r ,�:r;y_ "",-'t � xfJ's.. ..'d 1t ^� r k;`i~* 4 MA �Y''R lay.2... v k`ry. l0 "'� c,.e"' t � I-'I 4 �r r r. r w f r^" '4 y x '�.T 5. '? 5 a•._ 'T r �i -�t n�;� �_ S?T�I !II"a•' �� .�`�ll(� � I I i I '} It+J �t t ;. -A� +.. � _* >v. +' r/."'i «, +''- ., ' i ."t �'' �„r r i. "•TK:r ,>iJT s� ''+r Cl) rt r a , '`'f.,M 't e .� -�- ar RJ •i., •CD P =, 'lie — —LI — — L.� ELI �•..�.y a..®, ;.•r3:�1° r; ;a ,.___. 7 ate, s�"S�""' '.s.^'6`."e"'� _ a Sffi..Y., � �� "'r-. r ;, ��b.''3.•��li A a/n,,•7�1°,]� .- il� i - L ° _1 1. r. r {?av3.»a•J3��. ,;{ J ,i�+IAA J -t .t 1-�° _ �r, 1.�' �� � ..� �r i 1�• t� 1■ A n rl , A .a t o 1➢ •�i` r ..�ilnaa°�'�„ �� ? �°g r� � �1 Ilra i' n n ti r'Sri " ' ' 3 i�_ I ' u. i y, 1� Iti •� — I j .. ��-' 7� ' � I_L 1 �.dJl J+!Ifs.(,19!; 3a11 •i ', f};ti 'J• �• r �" -�v I Al_ �Ir rr ! � -L ,y[t ° r '� •- is {��II 'i i _ ;� �� ° r I^4 Ammonia R a�tor r - t3a+ �G J'' a, j 1 6!. `-7 --• A "� L 'j' it L; ti 6. ,3� r � Sr 1• ! ° 5'y f�r�3 -.. 0 0.1 0.2 Miles in Vapor Plume Modeling Worst-Case Ammonia Release Maximum Distance to 200 ppm; 0.1 mile AES Huntington Beach Generating Station Units 1 and 2 SCR Project iiaSpill.apr PM: JR Date: 01/01 66-00000008.00 I RMP*Comp V r. 1.06 �Q'V ��� Results of Consequence Analysis ��� 1> 40 Chemical: Lmmonia (anhydrous) CAS #: 766 -41-7 Category: oxic Gas Scenario: Worst-case �? Quantity Released- 200 pounds Release Du a'tion: 10 min Release Ra e: 20.0 pounds per min Mitigation easures: NONE Topography: Urban surroundings (many obstacles in the immediate area) Toxic Endp 'nt: 0.14 mg/L; basis: ERPG-2 Estimated ristance to Toxic Endpoint: 0.1 miles (0.2 kilometers) --------Ass =ptions About Thia Scenario--------- wind Speed: 1.5 meters/second (3.4 miles/hour) Stability Mass:: F Air Tempera ure: 77 degrees F (25 degrees C) ------------------------------------------------ ZO/Z0'd £9o# zo:OT LT-T0'TOOZ 6SZ0 b96 SOS tjas san: WONT 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 02/21 JAN 17 �Uu1 DEPARTMENT OF PLMNIING r. Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for Anhydrous Ammonia 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 03/21 Matheson Tri-Gras MSDS Ammonia,Anhydrous http://www.mathesongm:com/msds/AmmoniaAnhydrous.htm MATERIAL SAFETY DATA, SKEET SECTION 1 CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION MATHESON TRI-GAS, INC. EMERGENCY CONTACT: 959 ROUTE 46 EAST CHEMTREC 1-800-424-9300 PARSIPPANY, NEW JERSEY USA,07054-0624 OR 530 WATSON STREET INFORMATION CONTACT: WHITBY, ONTARIO, CANADA LIN 5R9 (USA)973-257-1100 (WHITBY)905-668-3570 (EDMONTON) 780471-4031 SUBSTANCE: ;A,MMONU, ANHYDROUS TRADE NAMES/SYNONI'MS: ANHYDROUS AMMONIA; AMMONIA GAS;AMMONIA;NITRO-SIL;R 717; SPIRIT OF HARTSHORN; UN 1005; STCC 4904210;H3N;MAT01050; RTECS B00875000 CHEMICAL FAMILY: inorganic, gas CREATION DATE: Jan 24 1989 REVISION DATE: Jun 012000 SECTION 2 COMPOSITION, INFORMATION ON .INGREDIENTS COMPONENT: AMMONIA,ANHYDROUS CAS NUMBER: 7664-41-7 EC N'UNISEI2(EL' ECS): 231-635-3 EC INDEX NUMBER: 007-001-00-5 PERCENTAGE: 100.0 SECTION 3 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION NFP.A.RATINGS (SCALE 0-4): HEALTH=3 FIRE-1 REACTIVITY=O VWIEEV,HS CLASSIFICATION: AE EC CLASSIFICATION (ASSIGNED): Flammable T Toxic C Corrosive N. Dangerous for the Environment R 10-23-34-50 1 of 8 1/2/2001 6:55 PM 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 04/21 Matheson Tri-Gas NASDS Ammonia,Anhydrous http://www.mathesonM.coin/msds/AmmoniaAnhydrous.htm EC Classification may be inconsistent with independently-researched data. T N EMERGENCY OVERVIEW: COLOR: colorless PHYSICAL FORM: gas ODOR: pungent odor MAJOR HEALTH HAZARDS: mucous membrane burns, respiratory irritation(possibly severe),skin irritation(possibly severe), eye irritation(possibly severe) PHYSICAL HAZARDS: Containers may rupture or explode if exposed to heat. POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS: INHALATION: SHORT TERM EXPOSURE: irritation(possibly severe), lack of sense of smell,nausea, vomiting, chest pain., difficulty breathing,headache,lung damage LONG TERM EXPOSURE: digestive disorders SKIN CONTACT: SHORT TERM EXPOSURE: irritation (possibly severe),blisters, frostbite LONG TERM EXPOSURE: same as effects reported in short term exposure EYE CONTACT: SHORT TERM EXPOSURE: irritation(possibly severe), frostbite, tearing,blindness, glaucoma LONG TERM EXPOSURE: same as effects reported in short term exposure INGESTION: SHORT TERM EXPOSURE: irritation (possibly severe), difficulty breathing,kidney damage LONG TERM EXPOSURE: same as effects reported in short term exposure CARCINOGEN STATUS: OSHA:N NTP: N IARC:N SECTION 4 FIRST AID N EASURES INHALATION: When safe to enter area, remove from exposure.Use a bag valve mask or similar device to perform artificial respiration,(rescue breathing)if needed.Keep warm and at rest. Get medical attention immediately. SKIN CONTACT: Remove contaminated clothing,jewelry, and shoes immediately. Wash with soap or mild detergent and large amounts of water until no evidence of chemical remains (at least 15-20 minutes). For burns, cover affected area securely with sterile, dry,loose-fitting dressing. Get medical attention immediately. EYE CONTACT: Wash eyes immediately with large amounts of water, occasionally lifting upper and lower lids, until no evidence of chemical remains. Continue irrigating with normal saline until ready to transport to hospital. Cover with sterile bandages. Get medical attention immediately. 2 of 3 1/2/2001 6:55 PM 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 05/21 hiatheson'fri-Gas MSDS Ammonia,Anhydrous http://www.lnathesongas.com/msds/AmmoniaAnhydrous.btrn INGESTION: Do not induce vomiting- Never make an unconscious person vomit or drink fluids. Give large amounts of water or milk. When vomiting occurs,keep head lower than hips to help prevent aspiration. If person is unconscious, turn head to side. Get medical attention immediately. NOTE TO PHYSICIAN: For inhalation, consider oxygen.For ingestion, consider esophagoscopy. Avoid gastric lavage. SECTION 5 FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES FIRE AND EXTLOSION HAZARDS:Negligible fire hazard. Moderate explosion hazard. Container's may p P rupture or explode if exposed to heat. ` EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: carbon dioxide, regular dry chemical Large fines: Use regular foam or flood with fine water spray. r- FIRE FIGHTING: Do not get water inside container. Move container from fire area if it can be done without risk. Cool containers with water spray until well after the fire is out. Stay away from the ends of tanks.Keep unnecessary people away,isolate hazard area and deny entry. Stop flow of gas. LOWER FLAMMABLE LIMIT: 15% UPPER FLAMMABLE LIMIT: 28% AUTOIGNI?ION: 1204 F (651 C) SECTION 6 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES AIR RELEASE: Reduce vapors with water spray. Collect runoff for disposal as potential hazardous waste. SOIL RELEASE: Trap spilled material at bottom in deep water pockets, excavated holding areas or within sand bag barriers. Dike for later disposal.Add dilute acid.Absorb with sand or other non-combustible material. WATER RELEASE: Collect spilled material using mechanical equipment. OCCUPATIONAL RELEASE: Stop leak if possible without personal risk.Reduce vapors with water spray. Do not get water directly on material. Do not get water inside container. Keep unnecessary people away,isolate hazard area and deny entry. Small spills: Flood with water. Large spills:Dike for later disposal. Stay upwind and keep out of low areas.Ventilate closed spaces before entering. Evacuation radius: 150 feet.Notify Local Emergency Planning Committee and State Emergency Response Commission for release greater than or equal to RQ (U.S. SARA.Section 304). If release occurs in the U.S. and is reportable under CERCLA Section 103, notify the National Response Center at(800)424-8802(USA)or(202)426-2675 (USA). 3 of 8 Irmool 6:55 PM 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 06/21 Matheson Tri-Gas MSOS Ammonia,Anhydrous http;//www.mathesongas.com/msd3/AmmoniaAnhydrous.htm SECTION 7 HANDLING AND STORAGE Store and handle in,accordance with all current regulations and standards. Subject to storage regulations: U.S. OSHA 29 CFR 1910.111. Protect from physical damage. Store outside or in a detached building. Inside storage: Store in a cool, dry place. Store in a well-ventilated area. Avoid heat,flames,sparks and other sources of ignition. Keep separated from incompatible substances.Keep separated from incompatible substances. Store in a cool, dry place. Store'in a well-ventilated area.Notify State Emergency Response Commission for storage or use at amounts greater than or equal to the TPQ (U.S. EPA SARA Section 302). SARA Section 303 requires facilities storing a material with a TPQ to participate in local emergency response planning(U.S. EPA 40 CFR 355.30). SECTION 8 EXPOSURE CONTROLS, PERSONAL PROTECTION EXPOSURE LIMITS: AMMONIA, ANHYDROUS: 50 ppm(35 mg/m3) OSHA TWA 35 ppm(27 mg/m3) OSHA STEL (vacated by 58 FR 35338, June 30, 1993) 25 ppm ACGIH TWA 35 ppm ACGIH STEL 25 ppm (18 mg/m3)NIOSH recommended TWA 10 hour(s) 35 ppm(27 mg/m3)NIOSH recommended STEL VENTILATION: Provide local exhaust ventilation system. Ensure compliance with applicable exposure limits. EYE PROTECTION: Wear splash resistant safety goggles with a faceshield. Provide an emergency eye wash fountain and quick drench shower in the immediate work area. CLOTHING: Wear appropriate chemical resistant clothing. GLOVES: Wear appropriate chemical resistant gloves. RESPIRATOR: The following respirators and maximum use concentrations are drawn from NIOSH and/or OSHA. 250 ppm Any chemical cartridge respirator with cartridge(s)providing protection against this substance. Any supplied-air respirator. 300 ppm Any supplied-air respirator: Any powered, air-purifying respirator with cart itdge(s)providing protection against this substance. Any chemical cartridge respirator with a full facepiece and cartridge(s)providing.protection against this substance. Any air-purifying respirator with a full facepiece and a canister providing protection against this substance. Any self-contained breathing apparatus with a full facepiece. Any supplied-air respirator with a full facepiece. Escape- Any air-purifying respirator with a full facepiece and a canister providing protection against this 4 of 8 1/2/2001 6:55 PM 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 07/21 Matheson Tri-Gas MSDS Ammonia,Anhydrous http://www.mathesongas.com/msds/AmmoniaAnhydrous.htm substance. Any appropriate escape-type, self-contained breathing apparatus. For Unknown Concentrations or Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health-Any supplied-air respirator with full facepiece and operated in a pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode in combination with a separate escape supply. Any self-contained breathing apparatus with a full facepiece. SECTION 9 PHYSICAL AND CH.EIVIICAL. PROPERTIES PHYSICAL STATE: gas COLOR: colorless ODOR: pungent odor MOLECULAR WEIGHT: 17.03 MOLECULAR FORMULA: N-H3 BOILING POINT: -27 F(-33 C) FREEZING POINT: -108 F (-78 C) VAPOR PRESSURE: 6658 mmHg @ 21 C f VAPOR DENSITY (air--I): 0.5967 SPECIFIC GRAVITY:Not applicable DENSITY: 0.7067 g/L @ 25 C WATER SOLUBILITY: 38%@ 20 C PH: 11.6 (1.0 N solution) VOLATILITY:Not applicable ODOR THRESHOLD: 1-5 ppm EVAPORATION RATE: Not applicable COEFFICIENT OF WATER/OIL DISTRIBUTION:Not applicable SOLVENT SOLUBILITY: Soluble: methanol, ethanol,chloroform, ether, organic solvents SECTION 10 STA.B.MITY AND REACTIVITY REACTIVITY: Stable at normal temperatures and pressure. CONDITIONS TO AVOID: Minimize contact with material. Avoid inhalation of material or combustion by-products. Containers may rupture or explode if exposed to heat.. INCOMPATIBILITIES: acids,combustible materials, metals, oxidizing materials,metal salts, halo carbons, halogens, amines,reducing agents,cyanides,bases HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION: Thermal decomposition products: ammonia, oxides of nitrogen POLYMERIZATION: Will not polymerize. SECTION U. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION 5 of s 1/2/2001 6:55 PM 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 08/21 Matheson Tri-Gss MSDS Ammonia,Anhydrous http://www.mathmngas.coWmsds/AmmoriaAnbydrous•htm AMMONIA,.ANHYDROUS: TOXICITY DATA: 2000 ppm/4 hour(s) inhalation-rat LC50 LOCAL EFFECTS: Corrosive: inhalation, skin,eye, ingestion .ACUTE TOXICITY LEVEL: Moderately Toxic:inhalation MEDICAL CONDITIONS AGGRAVATED BY EXPOSURE: eye disorders,respiratory disorders, skin disorders and allergies TUMORIGENIC DATA: Available. MUTAGENIC DATA: Available. SECTION 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION ECOTOXICITY DATA: FISH TOXICITY: 1600 ug/L 96 hour(s) LC50 (Mortality)Common jollytail (Galaxias maculates) INVERTEBRATE TOXICITY: 7700 ug/L 96 hour(s)LC50 (Immobilization)Ark shell (Anadara granosa) ALGAL TOXICITY: 2100-2300 ug/L NR hour(s) (Abundance)Algae,phytoplankton,algal mat(Algae) PHYTOTOXICITY: 16500 ug/L 30 hour(s)(Abundance)Common water-nymph(Najas guadalupensis) OTHER'TOXICITY: 27200 ug/L 30 hour(s) LETH (Mortality)Frog(Rana.sp) SECTION I.3 .DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS Dispose in accordance with all applicable regulations. SECTION 14 TRANSPORT INFORMATION U.S. DOT 49 CFR 172.101. SHIPPING NAME-UN NUMBER; HAZARD CLASS; PACKING GROUP; LABEL: Ammonia, anhydrous-LN1005; 2.3;Poison gas; Corrosive SECTION 1.5 REGULATORY INFORMATION U.S.REGULATIONS: TSCA INVENTORY STATUS: Y TSCA 12(b)EXPORT NOTIk'ICATION:Not listed. CERCLA SECTION 103 (40CFR302.4): Y AMMONIA,ANHYDROUS: 100 LBS RQ SARA SECTION 302 (40CFR355.30): Y AMMONIA,ANHYDROUS: 500 LBS TPQ SARA SECTION 304 (40CFR355.40): Y 6 of 8 1=001 6:55 PM 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 09/21 Matheson Tri-Gas MSDS Ammonia,Anhydrous http://—.Aiathesongas.com/msds/AmmoaiaAnhydrous.htz-- AMMONIA,ANHYDROUS: 100 LBS RQ SARA SECTION 313 (40CFR372.65): Y AMMONIA, ANHYDROUS SARA HAZARD CATEGORIES, SARA SECTIONS 311/312 (40CFR370.x1): ACUTE: Y CHRONIC: N FIRE:N REACTIVE:N SUDDEN RELEASE: Y OSHA PROCESS SAFETY (29CFR1910.119): Y AMNNIONIA, ANHYDROUS: 10000 LBS TQ STATE REGULATIONS: California Proposition 65:N EUROPEAN REGULATIONS: EC NUMBER(EINECS): 231-635-3 EC RISK AND SAFETY PHRASES: R 10 Flammable. ;r_ _ _ aR 23 -- �-Toxic by inhalation~-- - __-�_- - ��-R 34—..._— i Causes burns. `�_.�.._...�.__-- --------- ----------- -- ��� R 50 Very toxic to aquatic organisms- ---- S_1/2 ^;_Keep locked-up and out of reach of children. ------------ --------- S 9 Keep container in a well:ventilated place. S 16 Keep away from sources of ignition-No smoking. __ f S 26� -ti In case of contact with eyes,rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek medical ;Iadvice. [-S 36/37/39 ( Wear suitable protective clothing, gloves and eye/face protection S 45 case of accident or if you feel unwell, seek medical advice immediately(show the Mabel where possible). 'j S 61 !V Avoid release to the environment. Refer to special instructions/Safety data sheets. CONCENTRATION LIMITS: C>=5% T R 23-34 0.5%<--C<5%Xn R 20-36/37/38 SECTION 16 OTHER INFORMATION MSDS SUM LA.RY OF CHANGES SECTION 8 EXPOSURE CONTROLS,PERSONAL PROTECTION ®Copyright 1984-2000 MDL Information Systems. All rights reserved. IVLkTHESON TRI-GAS,INC.MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, GUAR.4�STEES OR REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING THE PRODUCT OR THE INFORMATION HEREIN,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY IMPLIED 7 of 8 1/2noo1 6:55 PM 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 10/21 Matheson Tri-Gas MSDS Ammonia,Anhydrous http://www.mathesongas.com/msds/AmmoniaA.ohydrous.htm WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR USE.MATHESON TRI-GAS, INC. SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY PERSONAL INJURY,PROPERTY OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY NATURE,WHETHER COMPENSATORY,CONSEQUENTIAL,- EXEMPLARY, OR OTHERWISE, RESULTING FROM ANY PUBLICATION,USE OR RELIANCE UPON THE INFORMATION HEREIN. 8 OF8 1/2/2001 6:55 FM 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 11/21 c 1V�® 17 2001 Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for Urea Solution (40 to 50% by weight) 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 12/21 LAIROCHE INDUSTRIES INC. Material Safety Data Sheet # 5004 Last Revision 02/01/97 SECTION l: C7rP=CAL PRODUCT & COMPANY IDENTIFICATION CE IC.AL NAME: Urea Solution TRADES NAMES/SYNONYMS: Urea Solution MANUFACTDRER AND/OR DISTRIBUTOR: EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS: LaRoche Industries Inc. Transportation (CHEMTREC) : 1-800-424-9300 1100 Johnson Ferry Rd., NE Environmental/Health/Safety: 1-200-528-4963 Atlanta, GA, 30342 After Hours (Orders Only) ; (404)491-7987 SECTION 2: COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS BY ACGIH OSHA N70SE CHEMICAL FORMULA WEIgHT CAS TLVS PELS REVS Urea N,H.CO 40-50 57-13-6 NONE NONE NONE Ammonia NH3 0.5-1.0 7664-41-7 25 ppm(TWA) !50 ppm(TWA) 25 PPM,(TWA) 35 PPM(STEEL) 35 PPM(STEL) Biuret C,H,N,O, a 0.5 108-19-0 NONE NONE NONE Water ISO 48.5-59.5 7732-18-5 NONE NONE NONE SECTION 3: HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION EMERGENCY OVERVIEW: ♦ Colorless liquid with slight ammonia odor ♦ Generally considered non flammable • Slight irritant to eye and skin ♦ Harmful to aquatic life in high concentrations ♦ Isolate and recover discharged materials ♦ Harmful if swallowed POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECT: ROUTES OF ENTRY: Eyes, Inhalation & Ingestion EYE CONTACT: Exposure to liquid, spray or mist may be irritating. SKIN CONTACT: Repeated or prolonged exposure may cause irritation. INHALATION: The vapor or a spray or mist may produce irritation to the nose, throat and upper respiratory tract. INGESTION: May produce nausea, vomiting,. abdominal pain and increased urination. SECTION 4: FIRST AID MEASURES EYE CONTACT: Immediately flush with large amounts of water lifting the upper and lower lids occasionally. Seek medical aid. SKIN CONTACT: Remove contaminated clothing. Wash affected areas with soap and water. Seek medical aid. INHALATION: Remove from exposure. If breathing has stopped or is difficult, administer artificial respiration or oxygen as needed. Seek medical aid. 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 13/21 MSDS #5004 Page 2 of 4 INGESTION: Give 1-2 large glasses of water or milk. Induce vomiting. Seek medical aid. SECTION 5: FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES FLASH POINT: None METHOD USED: None LOWER FLAMMABLE LIMIT: None UPPER FLAMMABLE LIMIT: None EXTINGUISHING MEDIA As appropriate for combustibles in area. SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: Wear full protective clothing and self-contained breathing apparatus approved by NIOSH when decomposition from heat is occurring. NFPA HAZARD CLASSIFICATION: Health: -- (as noted by company using NFPA criteria) Flammability. 0 Reactivity: 1 r SECTION 6: ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES Report Transportation Emergencies to CHEMTREC at 1-800-424-9300. Suggested Local Action: Prevent large quantities from contacting vegetation or waterways. Although urea is a plant food, it can be toxic to fish. Animals should be kept away from spills. Uncontaminated spills should be reclaimed and used as a leant nutrient. SECTION 7: HANDLING AND STORAGE Avoid heating containers of urea. wet urea can cause slippery surfaces. SECTION 8: EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: Respiratory protection approved by NIOSH/MSHA for protection against ammonia should be used to avoid excessive inhalation if needed. Appropriate respirator depends upon the scope and magnitude of exposure. SKIN PROTECTION: Clean, body-covering clothing should be worn to avoid skin contact. Butyl rubber protective gloves have been suggested for protection against material of this type. EYE PROTECTION: Employees should be required to wear chemical safety goggles to prevent eye contact. VENTILATION: Local exhaust ventilation should be used to control release of air contaminants in the work place. Gerieral dilution ventilation may assist with the reduction of air contaminant concentrations. OTHER EQUIPMENT: Emergency eye wash stations and deluge showers should be available in the work area. SECTION 9: PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES BOILING POINT: 2400-270OF VAPOR PRESSURE: 90mm Hg 0 100°F VAPOR DENSITY: Not Applicable SOLUBILITY IN WATER: Complete SPECIFIC GRAVITY. 1.2-1.3 (H,0=1) PERCENT VOLATILE BY VOLUME: Not Applicable 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 14/21 KSDS #5004 Page 3 of 4 SECTION 10; STABILITY AND REACTIVITY STABILITY: material generally considered stable. INCOMPATIBILITY (Materials to Avoid) ; May react with nitrates, alkali, oxidizing agents, hypochlorites, aldehydes and inorganic acids. Corrosive to copper and copper alloys,. as well as galvanized metals. May react explosively with oxidizers such as nitrates when heated under certain undefined conditions. HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS! Ammonia gas. HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: will not occur. r. CONDITIONS TO AVOID: Elevated temperatures may release ammonia. SECTION 11: TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION TOXICITY BY INGESTION: Data Not Available LATE TOXICITY: None SECTION 12: ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION (UREA). AQUATIC TOXICITY: 30 g/l/24 hr/ creek chub/ all died/ fresh water 16 g/l/24 hr/ creek chub/ all survived/ fresh water WATER FOWL TOXICITY: DATA NOT AVAILABLE BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DENAND: 9t, 5 Days FOOD CHAIN CONCENTRATION POTENTIAL: None Prevent large quantities from contact with vegetation or waterways. Although urea is a plant food, it can be toxic to fish. Animals should be kept away from spills. ��... .ems SECTION 13: DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS Uncontaminated spills should be recovered and used as nitrogen fertilizer. if contaminated with other materials, the nature and extent of contamination may require use of specialized disposal methods. If disposal is necessary, comply with all local, state and federal regulations. For Hazardous waste Regulations call 1-800-424-9346, the RCRA Hotline. SECTION 14: TRANSPORT INFORMATION This product is not regulated as a hazardous material by DOT. Recommended shipping name: "Urea Solution" SECTION 15: REGULATORY INFORMATION NOTICE: This product is subject to the reporting requirements of SARA (1986, Section 213 of Title III) and 40 CPR Part 370. OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION RULE, 29 CPR 1910.1200 Product should be considered a hazardous chemical under 29 CFR 1910.1200 due to presence of ammonia. 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 15/21 MSDS #5004 Page 4 of 4 TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL ACT 71 is material is listed in the TSCA inventory under its primary ingredients: urea (CAS# 57-13-6) , water (CAS# 7732-18-5) , biuret (CAS# 108-19-0) and ammonia (CAS# 7694-41-7) . EX9AGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RI(+HT-TO-KNOW ACT (SARA, TITLE III) Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substance: Yes (Ammonia) Section 311/312 Hazardous Categories: Immediate (acute) health hazards' Section 313 Toxic Chemical: Yes (Ammonia) 3xpoeure to high concentrations of ammonia may cause severe & irreversible eye and/or respiratory damage. CERCLA/SUPERFUND, 40 CFR 117,302: This product contains up to 1.01 ammonia, which if released into the environment in quantities of 100 lb. or more of ammonia requires immediate notification to the LEPC, the State Emergency Planning Commission and the National Response Center in Washington, DC at 1-800-424-8802• WKMZS: One Percent (1*) - Ammonia CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65: Reproductive: No Carcinogen: No OSHA PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT, 29 CFR 1910.119: This product is not subject to the Process Safety Management requirements of 29 CFR 1910.119. EPA CHEMICAL ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION, 40 CFR PART 68: - This product is not subject to the Risk Management Plan requirements of 40 CFR Past 68. SECTION 16: OTHER INFORMATION REASON FOR REVISION: ♦ Addition of NIOSH RELS to Section 2. ♦ New format MSDS. ♦ supersedes MSDS dated 3/13/95. MSDS PREPARED SY: LaRoche Corporate Office of Regulatory Affairs - This information is taken from sources or based upon data believed to be reliable, however, LaRoche Industries Inc. makes no warranty as to the absolute correctness or sufficiency of any of the foregoing or that additional or other measures may not be required under particular conditions. 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 16/21 Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for Urea Solution with Ammonia 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 17/21 LAROCHE INDUSTRIES INC. Material Safety Data Sheet # 5007 Last Revision 02/01/97 SECTION 1: CHEMICAL PRODUCT & COMPANY IDENTIFICATION CHEMICAL NAME: Urea Solution with Ammonia TRADE NAMES/SYNONYMS: Nitrogen Manufacturing Solution PRODUCT CODE: 5B69 MANUFACTURER AND/OR DISTRIBUTOR: EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBMRS: LaRoche Industries Inc. TransportaCion (CHEMTREC) : 1-800-424-9300 1100 aolinson Ferry Rd. , NE Environmental/Health/Safety: . 1-800-528-4963 Atlanta, GA 30342 After Hours (Orders Only) : (404)491-7987 SECTION 2: COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS BY ACGIH OSHA NIOSH CHEMICAL FORMULA, WRIGHT CAS TLVS• PELS RELS Ammonia NH, 35-38 7664-41-7 25 PPM(TW,A,) 50 ppm(TWA) 25 ppm(TWA) 35 ppm STEL) 35 ppm(STEL) Urea N,H,CO 28-34 57-13-6 NONE NONL NONE Water H2O 28-36 77.32-18-5 NONE NONE none SECTION 3t HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION EMERGENCY OVERVIEW: ♦ Colorless liquid with pungent ammonia odor • Generally considered non flammable ♦ Irritant to eye and skin ♦ Harmful to aquatic life ♦ Isolate and recover discharged materials ♦ Harmful if swallowed POTENTIAL, HEALTH EFFECT, ROUTES OF EMRY: Eyes, Inhalation & Ingestion. EYE CONTACT: Liquid or vapor exposure may cause severe irritation. SKIN CONTACT: Can cause severe irritation and burns. INHALATION: Ammonia vapor can. be suffocating and is irritating to the mucous membranes and lung tissues. Ammonia is alkaline and reacts corrosively with all body tissue. INGESTION: Can cause vomiting, nausea and corrosive burns to the esophagus and stomach. The exact nature and intensity of toxic effects following ingestion of varying amounts of ammonia solution is unpredictable. The 'most accepted view is that any amount from one teaspoon or greater can be dangerous if ingested. 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 18/21 Product Code 5B69 XSDS #5007 Page 2 of 5 CARCINOGENICITY: NTP? No IARC? No OSHA? No SECTION 4: FIRST AID MEASURES RYE CONTACT: Flush with large amounts of water for at least 1.5 minutes. Immediately seek medical aid. SKIN CONTACT: Immediately flush with large quantities of water while removing contaminated clothing. Medical aid may be required. INHALATION: Remove from exposure. If breathing has stopped or is difficult, administer artificial respiration or oxygen as needed. Immediately seek medical aid. INGESTION: Do not induce vomiting. Rinse mouth with water and give plenty of milk or water to drink. Immediately seek medical aid. SECTION 5: FIRE FIGHTING MEASIIRBS FLASH POINT: None METHOD USED: None LOWER FLABOIABLE LIMIT: 16; Ammonia Vapor UPPER FLAMMABLE LIMIT: 2Sk Ammonia Vapor EXTSNaUI811ING MEDIA: Water fog or spray for ammonia gas (ammonia vapor) . FIRE & EXPLOSION BA7.ARDS: The solution will not burn, but escaping ammonia gas can burn in the concentration range of 16-25* in air. Wear full protective clothing and self-contained breathing apparatus in the pressure demand mode. NFPA HAZARD CLASSIFICATION: Health: 3 (As rated by company using NFPA criteria) Flammability; I Reactivity: 0 SECTION 6: ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES Report Transportation Emergencies to CHEMTREC at 1-800-424-9300. Should a release occur into the air, water or onto land, immediate notification to the National Response Center (1-800-424-8802) will be required if the release . exceeds 100 lb. of ammonia. Immediate notification to the LEPC and state Emergency Planning Commission: is also required. Suggested Local Action: Contain all leaks and spills to prevent contamination of land or water. Recover spilled material and place it in containers for proper disposal. Use as nitrogen fertilizer if feasible. If spill or wash water enters a sewer or waterway, notify appropriate authorities. Avoid contamination with any oxidizable matter. 01/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 19/21 Product Code 5B69 MSDS #5007 Page 3 of 5 SECTION 7: HANDLING AND STORAGE Store in approved pressure vessels away from heat. Open containers cautiously due to pressure. Zinc, copper and copper alloys such as brass are rapidly corroded by solutions containing ammonia. SECTION 8: EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: Respiratory protection approved by NIOSH/MSHA for ammonia must be used when exposure limits are exceeded. Appropriate protection depends on the type and magnitude of exposure. SKIN PROTECTION: Rubber gloves and rubber or PVC/Nylon/PVC laminate protective clothing should be used to prevent skin contact. A face shield should be used when appropriate to prevent contact with splashed liquid. BYE PROTECTION: Employees should be required to wear chemical safety goggles to prevent eye contact. VENTILATION: Local exhaust ventilation should be used to control release - of air contaminants in the work place. General dilution ventilation may assist with the reduction. of air contaminant concentrations. OTHER EQUIPMENT: Emergency eye wash stations and deluge showers should be available in the work area. SECTION 9: PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES BOILING POINT: Not Available VAPOR PRESSURE: 60 psig at 1040F VAPOR DENSITY: 0.60 (,Air=1.0) SOLUBILITY IN WATER: Complete DENSITY: 7.70 lb./gal. -at 60OF PERCENT VOLATILE BY VOLUME: 35-381s (any ammonia) SECTION 10: STABILITY AND REACTIVITY STABILITY: Material generally considered stable. INCOMPATIBILITY (Materials to Avoid) : Strong acids. Aqua ammonia reacts with chlorine, bromine, mercury, silver, silver solder and hypochlorite (bleach) to form explosive.and/or toxic Compounds. Avoid use of metals containing copper or zinc. HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS; Above 270OF urea begins decomposition to biuret, ammonia, cyanuri'c acid and nitrogen oxides. Heating and contact of vapors with very hot surfaces may form hydrogen. Certain metals, such as nickel, accelerate decomposition of ammonia at as low as 5750P. HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will 'not occur. el/15/2001 08:06 714-641-9014 WAHLCO PAGE 20/21 Product Code 5B69 MSDS 45007 Page 4 of 5 CONDITIONS TO AVOID: Heating above ambient temperatures causes the vapor pressure of ammonia to increase rapidly and could cause vessel rupture. , SECTION 11: TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION IDLH Leval: 300 ppm Oral LD50 (rat) 350 mg NH3/kg. Ammonia is a strong base and reacts with all body tissues. Prolonged inhalation of high concentrations of ammonia may cause bronchitis and/or pneumonia, with some residual reduction in pulmonary functions. Symptoms of lung edema are often latent (usually a few hours) , and are aggravated by physical effort. Rare allergic manifestations (urtiearia) may occur from inhalation. SECTION 12: ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION Prevent large quantities from contact with vegetation or waterways. Although urea and ammonia are plant foods, either can be toxic to fish. Animals should be kept away from spills. SECTION 13: DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS Uncontaminated spills should be recovered and used as nitrogen fertilizer. If contaminated with other materials, the nature and extent of contamination may require use of specialized disposal methods. If disposal is necessary, comply with all local, state and federal regulations. For Hazardous Waste Regulations call 1-800-424-9346, the RCRA Hotline. SECTION 14t TRANSPORT INFORMATION Proper shipping name: Corrosive liquid, n.o.s. (contains ammonia) DOT Hazard Class: 6 Identification Number: UN1760 Packing Group: III SECTION 15: REGULATORY INFORMATION NOTICE: This product is subject to the reporting requirements of SARA (1986, Section 313 of Title III) and 40 CFR Part 372, as well as 40 CFR Part 370. OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION RULE, 29 CFR 1910.1200 Ammonia is considered a hazardous chemical. TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL ACT This material is listed in the TSCA Inventory under its primary, ingredients: ammonia (CAS# 7664-41-7) , urea (CAS# 57-13-6) and water (CAS# 7732-18-5) EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COW4VWITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT (SARA, TITLE III) Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substance: Yes (Ammonia) Section 311/312 Hazardous Categories: Immediate (acute) health hazards" Section 313 Toxic Chemical: Yes (Ammonia) * Exposure co high concentrations of ammonia may cause severe & irreversible eye and/or respiratory damage. -F r �J �� City, of H�nti gton$eachPlanting Uepatmen t SAFF� POR y E' HUNTINGTON BEACH `^ h � : TO: Planning Commission FROM: Howard Zelefsky, Director of Planning BY: Jane James,Associate Planner DATE: December 12, 2000 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09 (AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station) APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: Mr. Han Tan, AES Huntington Beach, LLC,21730 Newland Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 LOCATION: 21730 Newland Street(Northeast of Newland and Pacific Coast Highway) STATEMENT OF ISSUE: • Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 request: - Install a Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR) system at AES Huntington Beach Generating Station's Units 1 and 2 to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions • Staff s Recommendation: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 based upon the following: - SCAQMD mandates reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions from AES power generation facility. - Additional equipment has negligible impact on aesthetics of plant. - Ammonia will be generated on an as needed basis eliminating hazards associated with transport and storage of ammonia. - Complies with General Plan goals and objectives regarding intensification of landscaping. - Complies with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Development Standards. - Conditions of approval regarding bonding for future dedication and improvements for Newland Street. - No adverse environmental impacts associated with SCR equipment . 1 PROJECT '�'� , z SITEIRV _ r • AD*= IlIIII! G Oi-2 0. Ca GENERATM . O A C Cb p ay CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09 THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: A. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 00-09 with findings (Attachment No. 1);" B. "Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 with findings and suggested conditions of approval (Attachment No. 1)." ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A. "Deny Negative Declaration No. 00-09, Conditional Use Permit No. 00749, and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 with findings for denial." B. "Continue Negative Declaration No. 00-09, Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49, and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 and direct staff accordingly." PROJECT PROPOSAL: Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 represents a request to install a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system at AES Huntington Beach Generating Station's Units 1 and 2 pursuant to Section 212.04, IL and IG Districts: Land Use Controls,Industrial Uses of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO). SCR will be used to reduce nitrogen oxide(NOx) emissions as part of AES' plan to meet the declining facility-wide NOx emission allocation limits required by South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD)Regional Clean Air Incentives Market(RECLAIM) Program The proposed project consists of the installation of the following components: • Two SCR Reactor Units: The reactor units will be located in each of the two boiler exhaust ducts between the economizer and air heaters of Units One and Two. The units include the installation of carbon steel assemblies comprised of four reactors, 26 feet long by 19 feet wide by 9 feet high. • Control Equipment: The SCR control equipment will be incorporated into the existing plant distribution control system with new interface hardware. • Ammonia Source Component: The project uses ammonia as the principal NOx reducing agent. Although the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 00-09 analyzed generation of ammonia by two different methods,AES has.determined that the Preferred Approach will be utilized. A description of the Preferred Approach follows and is now called the Proposed Approach. The Alternative Approach, which proposed to transport and store a 19 percent aqueous ammonia(ammonia hydroxide) solution is no longer proposed as part of the project. PC Staff Report-12/12/00 3 (OOSR76) ❑ The Proposed Approach is to generate ammonia onsite using a Urea to Ammonia (U2A) generation process. The U2A system will require installation of a 20 ft. long by 8 ft. wide conversion skid and a 4 ft. long by 5 ft. wide pump skid and will utilize the existing on-site urea storage tanks. The solid urea will be transported to the site every five days during the peak summer months. Additional details regarding the U2A process can be found in Negative Declaration No. 00-09 (Attachment No. 5). Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 pursuant Chapter 221 of the ZSO is requested for a project within the coastal zone pursuant to Section 245.06 of the ZSO. All new equipment is proposed within the existing fenceline of the Huntington Beach Generating Station. The SCR Reactor Units will be encased in the existing boiler duct work and would not be visible off-site. All other new components will be installed close to the boiler structure and would also not be visible off-site. A temporary construction laydown area is proposed adjacent to Unit 4. The construction of the project is anticipated to occur between January and April of 2001. An outage, or shut down, of the Generation Station is scheduled to begin February 14, 2001. Electrical power will continue to be provided to the Huntington Beach community because power is supplied through a grid system for all of California. AES has scheduled the shut down with California Independent System Operator(CALISO), an organization responsible for ensuring available energy throughout the system. CALISO monitors and staggers routine outtages for general maintenance or installation of new equipment so that sufficient power continues to be available to all users within the grid area. The SCR system is scheduled to be on-line in May of 2001. The construction of the proposed project includes a crew of approximately 30 temporary tradesmen. Construction equipment includes a boom truck, air tugger, eight pack welding machine, and a crane. The applicant has indicated that the request is necessary(Attachment No. 3)because the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)mandates a reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions for this facility. PC Staff Report-12/12/00 4 (OOSR76) ISSUES: Subject Property And Surrounding Land Use,Zoning And General Plan Designations: LOCATIONS GENERAL PLAN ZONING ry � LDIS E .� Subject Property: Public IG-O-CZ-FP2 (General AES Huntington Industrial-Oil Overlay- Beach Power Coastal Zone-Floodplain) Generating Station North of Subject Industrial-F2-design IG-O-CZ-FP2 (General Southern California Property: overlay Industrial-Oil Overlay- Edison Tank Farm Coastal Zone-Floodplain) East of Subject Open Space- CC-O-CZ-FP2 (Coastal Vacant/Wetlands Property: Conservation Conservation-Oil Overlay- Coastal Zone-Floodplain) South(across Pacific Open Space-Shoreline IG-O-CZ-FP2 and Wildlife Care Center Coast Highway) of CF-R(Community and Pacific Ocean Subject Property: Facilities-Recreation) West(across Residential Medium RMP-CZ-FP2 (Residential Vacant and Mobile Newland Street) of Density-15 Manufactured Home Park- Home Park Subject Property: I Coastal Zone-Floodplain) General Plan Conformance: The General Plan Land Use Map designation on the subject property is Public. The proposed project is consistent with this designation and the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan as follows: A. Land Use Element Policy LU 2.1.1: Plan and construct public infrastructure and service improvements as demand necessitates to support the land uses specified in the Land Use Plan (as defined in the Circulation and Public Utilities and Services Elements of the General Plan). B. Utilities Element Goal U 5: Maintain and expand service provision(of gas supply,telecommunication, and electricity)to City of Huntington Beach residents and business. Policy U 5.1.1: Continue to work with service providers to maintain current levels of service and facilitate improved levels of service. PC Staff Report-12/12/00 5 (OOSR76) r r Policy U 5.1.4: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The existing AES power generating facility is necessary to provide power to Huntington Beach residents and business owners in addition to the power services provided for the entire Southern California power grid. The new SCR system will benefit residents,property owners, and the Huntington Beach community by reducing nitrogen oxide emissions from the plant as mandated by the SCAQMD. Installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility because the equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work. The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions'of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. - C. Urban Design Element Policy UD 2.2.1: Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. Policies- UD 1.4.1: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. D. Draft Coastal Element Draft Policy 6c: Prohibit development along the bluffs rising up to the Bolsa Chica mesa (within the City's jurisdiction)which will alter the natural landforms or threaten the stability of the bluffs. Drat Policy 9a: Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas that does not significantly degrade habitat values and which is compatible with the continuance of the habitat. Recognizing the greater than local significance of the City's energy resources, Coastal Element policy allows for the continuation, and in some cases expansion, of these facilities while ensuring the community's public health and safety,environmental protection and minimization of negative aesthetic impacts to the maximum extent feasible. The suggested conditions of approval include requirements for AES to improve the quality of existing landscaping around the southern and eastern property lines while also making the irrigation system 100% operational. The conditions also include language requiring AES to enter into an agreement with the City with a fair share proportionate bond to cover the cost of landscaping and street improvements for Newland Street. PC Staff Report-12/12/00 6 (OOSR76) l Zoning Compliance: This project is located in the General Industrial zone and complies with the requirements of that zone. Most of the construction of the SCR equipment will take place on the ground around the location of two existing urea storage tanks and also within the boiler systems of the two operating power units,Units 1 and 2. All aspects of the new equipment installation conform to zoning development standards such as height and setbacks. Urban Design Guidelines Conformance: The proposed project is in substantial conformance with the Urban Design Guidelines, Chapter 11, Section 14 District Specific Guidelines,Edison and Sanitation(Attachment No. 6). The Guidelines specify the landscaping around the power plant should be intensified to screen the view of the facility from Pacific Coast Highway. The suggested conditions of approval require the applicant to fill in, intensify, and replace the dead and dying landscaping around the south and east sides of the plant. The conditions also require functional irrigation to ensure the longevity of the new and the existing plant material. In addition,the applicant has hired a landscape architect to coordinate a new planting scheme to intensify the existing planting plan and to improve the aesthetic view from Pacific Coast Highway. The new plan will be subject to review and approval of the City's Landscape Architect and the Planning Department. Environmental Status: Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment and determined that no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project that could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance with proper design and engineering. Subsequently,Negative Declaration No. 00- 09 (Attachment No. 5)was prepared pursuant to Section 240.04 of the HBZSO and the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act(CEQA). Although the initial study analyzed two methods for generating ammonia, a necessary component of the SCR system,the applicant has since revised the project description so that the Preferred Approach, which generates ammonia from urea on-site and on an as needed basis, is the sole proposed method. Therefore,the Alternative Approach,which proposed to transport and store a 19% aqueous ammonia(ammonia hydroxide) solution is no longer part of the proposed project. Consequently,mitigation measures necessary to protect the community from the accidental risk of ammonia spill in the Alternative Approach, are no longer necessary and have been removed. An Errata to the Draft Negative Declaration has been prepared and is attached (Attachment No. 5). The Planning Department advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 00-09 for thirty (30) days commencing on November 2, 2000 and ending on December 1, 2000. Notification of the comment period was published in the Independent Newspaper,was posted at the County of Orange, and a copy of the Initial Study was directly mailed to all property owners within 300 feet PC Staff Report-12/12/00 7 (OOSR76) f C of the site as well as interested parties such as representatives from the Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association and Huntington Beach Coastal Communities Association. The Draft Negative Declaration was also sent to the State Clearinghouse where the document was forwarded to numerous agencies for review. Comments were received from AES Huntington Beach, LLC., Huntington Beach Environmental Board, Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association, Huntington Beach Coastal Communities Association, Mr. Richard Loy,the County of Orange Planning and Development Services Department, and the Department of Toxic Substances Control. Responses and Errata have been included with the attached Negative Declaration. Environmental Board Comments: The Environmental Board was notified of the Negative Declaration. On December 6, 2000, the Environmental Board provided a letter(Attachment No. 5) addressing several issues including: • Identify transit route and vehicles to be used for transportation of aqueous ammonia • Risk Management Plan and California Accidental Release Program should address employment receptors and a fence line analysis in addition to residential receptors. • Strongly recommend Urea to Ammonia(Preferred Approach) Again, a response and errata have been prepared(Attachment No. 5). It should be noted that the AES' confirmation of the Urea to Ammonia Process sufficiently addresses the three comments by the Environmental Board by eliminating the use,transport, and storage of the 19% aqueous ammonia. Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No.00-15, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 00-09. Staff, in its initial study of the project, is recommending that the negative declaration be approved with findings Coastal Status:. I The proposed project is within an appealable portion of the Coastal Zone. Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 is being processed concurrently with Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 pursuant to Chapter 245 of the ZSO. The proposed project complies with the zoning code and Coastal Zone requirements. See the General Plan section above for a discussion on how the project will implement the Draft Coastal Element policies. PC Staff Report-12/12/00 8 (OOSR76) l Redevelopment Status: Not applicable. However, the Redevelopment Agency staff has recently begun a series of public meetings to consider forming a new Redevelopment Project Area in the southeast section of Huntington Beach, including the AES Power Generating Facility. Design Review Board: The Design Review Board (DRB) reviewed the colors and materials of the proposed SCR equipment on November 16, 2000. The DRB approved the proposed project finding that the additional mechanical equipment will not significantly alter the aesthetic appearance of the facility and an additional landscaping requirement complies with the Urban Design Guidelines. The DRB recommends the Planning Commission approve the proposed project with the following condition of approval (See Condition of Approval No. 4.f., Attachment No. 1 : • Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall replace dead and dying landscaping and make the landscape irrigation system 100% functional along the south and east perimeter of the power plant. Plans shall include sections demonstrating how the ultimate growth of the plant material will help screen the existing plant. The landscaping and irrigation improvements shall be subject to review and approval of a landscape construction set by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works and Planning Departments. Staff agrees with the DRB's recommended action. Subdivision Committee: Not applicable. Other Departments Concerns: The Departments of Public Works,Fire, and Building and Safety have recommended conditions which are incorporated into the conditions of approval. The Fire Department was very concerned with the proposed use of ammonia in the Alternative Approach, however,the Fire Department's concerns were substantially reduced by AES' commitment to the Urea to Ammonia Approach. Public Notification: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Independent on Thursday, November 30, 2000, and notices were sent to property owners of record within a 300 ft. (and tenants within a 100 ft)radius of the subject property, individuals/organizations requesting notification(Planning Department's Notification Matrix), applicant, and interested parties. In particular, notices were sent to representatives of the Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association and Huntington Beach Coastal Communities Association. As of December 5, 2000, all written communication regarding the request is in conjunction with the Environmental Assessment. PC Staff Report-12/12/00 9 (OOSR76) Application Processing Dates: DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S): Negative Declaration: October 25, 2000 April 25, 2001 (Six Months) Conditional Use Permit: September 29, 2000 Within three months from Negative Declaration Approval ANALYSIS: There are three primary issues for the Planning Commission to consider when,analyzing the proposed SCR project: 1) land use compatibility, 2) aesthetics, and 3) community safety and benefits. Land Use Compatibility The proposed installation of SCR equipment is a small project in comparison to the overall power generating facility. The nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment and the associated urea to ammonia process will be compatible with the existing operations at the power plant. The actual mechanical equipment necessary for the project will either be hidden behind the fenceline or represent a minor change in the exterior appearance in the boiler duct work of Units 1 and 2. In terms of land use compatibility with the surrounding properties,the existing power generating station and the proposed SCR equipment are both compatible with the General Industrial zoning on the property. There is a mix of land uses around the plant as evident in the chart on page 5 of this report. The proposed nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment, which will reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from the plant by 90% of the current emissions as required by the SCAQMD, will improve the facility's compatibility with surrounding uses, especially with the amended project description eliminating the transport and storage of aqueous ammonia. Aesthetics The proposed SCR equipment located on the ground within the plant will not be visible from off- site. The new mechanical equipment to be installed within the two boilers of Units 1 and 2 will be visible from outside the facility perimeter. However,the equipment will be constructed within the existing machinery in the boiler units and the aesthetic impact to the overall plant will be negligible. The applicant has supplied before and after photographic renditions of the new SCR mechanical equipment to demonstrate the minute impact on the appearance of the facility (Attachment No. 2). A common theme throughout the City's General Plan,Urban Design Guidelines, Coastal Element, and the requests of the community is the goal of minimizing the visual impact of the facility through the use of intensified landscaping. The City also has separately stated the goal of widening and improving Newland Street between Pacific Coast Highway and Hamilton Avenue. PC Staff Report-12/12/00 10 (OOSR76) The Newland Street widening project goes beyond the boundaries of the AES facility and the Public Works Department recommends that the entire street section be widened and reconstructed to improve safety, appearance, and drainage issues. AES will ultimately be responsible for constructing half-width street improvements along the Newland Street frontage of the project site.Improvements include dedication for street widening, relocation and reconstruction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and landscaping. The street also needs grading improvements to improve visibility and traffic safety due to a rise in the street elevation. Therefore, staff recommends that AES enter into an agreement with the City to bond and pay for their fair share toward the cost of improving the street adjacent to the plant. That way, the Public Works Department can coordinate with other adjacent property owners up to Hamilton and complete the improvements in one efficient, cost-saving project(See Condition of Approval No. 4.b., Attachment No. 1). The Public Works Department estimates that the total street improvement project is about one year away. The DRB and staff also recommend conditions of approval which require AES to replace dead and dying landscaping, fill in, and intensify the landscaping along the south and easterly property lines of the facility. The irrigation system should also be made completely functional to ensure the long-term viability of the landscaping. As stated above, goals of the General Plan, Urban Design Guidelines, and Draft Coastal Element call for intensified landscaping at the power plant. A letter forwarded to Southern California Edison, the previous property owner, from the City in 1997 (Attachment No.4), also discussed the City's goals for intensified landscaping to screen the aesthetic impact of the plant. The City's letter stated that additional landscaping would be required along the south and east property lines when the next project was proposed, regardless of the ownership of the property. Therefore, staff recommends a condition of approval requiring intensified landscaping to be provided along the south and east property lines prior to final inspection of the SCR system. Community Safety and Bene its As described in the Project Description, SCR is intended to reduce the nitrogen oxide emissions from the facility by 90% as mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. This project, with the commitment from AES to utilize the urea to ammonia approach,will benefit the Huntington Beach community and improve air quality issues in our region. With the change from use of aqueous ammonia to a urea to ammonia approach,the risk of upset during transport and storage of ammonia is eliminated. As discussed in the Response to Comments and Errata to Negative Declaration No. 00-09,mitigation measures are no longer necessary to address risks associated with use of aqueous ammonia. The SCAQMD will be the responsible agency for monitoring the SCR equipment and the nitrogen oxide emissions. Monitors within the boiler system test the emissions on a continual basis and ensure compliance with AQMD standards. PC Staff Report-12/12/00 11 (OOSR76) The City of Huntington Beach Fire Department is normally responsible for reviewing and approving any mandated Risk Management Plan and California Accidental Release Prevention Program. These two plans entail emergency response plans and are necessary to address and plan for accidental release of hazardous materials. However,with the elimination of aqueous ammonia and implementation of the Urea to Ammonia process, an amended emergency response plan may not be necessary. The suggested conditions of approval state that the project shall comply with the Cal-ARP program for Hazardous Materials reporting so that the Fire Department can determine the levels of compliance necessary (See Condition of Approval No. 6. a) 6), Attachment No. 1). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval i, Fieer Pimnts and Elevations dated September , A 3 Narrative 4. Letter dated September 23, 1997 from Melanie Fallon, City of Huntington Beach to Peter Lersey, SCE , , , the JAO' 6. Urban Design Guidelines Checklist SH:HF.J:rl PC Staff Report-12/12/00 12 (OOSR76) ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09 : 1. The Negative Declaration No. 00-09 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty (30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00- 15. 2. The proposed project, method of ammonia generation, and standard conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Planning Commission that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 will have a significant effect on the environment. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of the Selective Catalytic Reduction(SCR) system at AES Huntington Beach Power Generating Station will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The SCR system is proposed in order to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from the power plant as mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The ammonia necessary for reduction of nitrogen oxide emissions will be generated via a Urea to Ammonia process,which allows ammonia to be generated on an as needed basis. Therefore, the proposed project does not include any transport or storage of ammonia. Based upon the conditions imposed and the proposed project itself,the community will benefit from reduced nitrogen oxide emissions. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because nitrogen oxide emissions from the power generating facility will be reduced, dead and dying landscaping will be replaced, irrigation systems will be made 100% operational, and landscaping along (OOSR76)- 12/12/00 Attachment No. 1.13 the south and east perimeter will be intensified. This project is also compatible with surrounding uses because.installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility. The equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. 3. The proposed Selective Catalytic Reduction at AES Huntington Beach will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed project complies with all development standards of the General Industrial zoning district. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Public on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: A. Land Use Element Policv LU2.1.1: Plan and construct public infrastructure and service improvements as demand necessitates to support the land uses specified in the Land Use Plan(as defined in the Circulation and Public Utilities and Services Elements of the General Plan). C. Utilities Element Goal U 5: Maintain and expand service provision(of gas supply, telecommunication, and electricity)to City of Huntington Beach residents and business. Policy U 5.1.1: Continue to work with service providers to maintain current levels of service and facilitate improved levels of service. Policy U5.1.4: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The existing AES power generating facility is necessary to provide power to Huntington Beach residents and business owners in addition to the power services provided for the entire Southern California power grid. The new SCR system will benefit residents, property owners, and the Huntington Beach community by reducing nitrogen oxide emissions from the plant as mandated by the SCAQMD. Installation of the SCR equipment will have a negligible impact on the visual quality of the existing facility because the equipment will be installed within the existing boiler duct work and will not significantly alter the appearance of the existing plant. The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. (OOSR76)- 12/12/00 Attachment No. 1.14 C. Urban Design Element Policy UD 2.2.1: Require landscape and architectural buffers and screens around oil production facilities and other utilities visible from public rights-of-way. Policies- UD 1.4.1: Require the review of new and or expansions of existing industrial and utility facilities to ensure that such facilities will not visually impair the City's coastal corridors and entry nodes. The SCR system will not impair aesthetic quality of the City's coastal corridors or entry node. Suggested conditions of approval also include requirements for AES to intensify the existing landscaping around the south and east perimeters of the plant. D. Draft Coastal Element Drat Policy 6c: Prohibit development along the bluffs rising up to the Bolsa Chica mesa(within the City's jurisdiction)which will alter the natural landforms or threaten the stability of the bluffs. Draft Policy 9a: Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas that does not significantly degrade habitat values and which is compatible with the continuance of the habitat. Recognizing the greater than local significance of the City's energy resources, Coastal Element policy allows for the continuation, and in some cases expansion, of these facilities while ensuring the community's public health and safety, environmental protection and minimization of negative aesthetic impacts to the maximum extent feasible. The suggested conditions of approval include requirements for AES to improve the quality of existing landscaping around the southern and eastern property lines while also making the irrigation system 100% operational. The conditions also include language requiring AES to enter into an agreement with the City with a fair share proportionate bond to cover the cost of landscaping and street improvements for Newland Street. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 for the development project, as proposed or as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The project includes conditions to replace dead and dying landscaping,to make irrigation systems 100%operational, and to intensify landscaping along the south and east perimeter of the power plant. The project complies with the Draft Coastal Element, (OOSR76)- 12/12/00 Attachment No. 1.15 currently under review by the Planning Commission, which states that landscaping should be utilized to buffer the appearance of existing utility operations. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The SCR system complies with all aspects of the Coastal Zone overlay and the General Industrial zoning district. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. All infrastructure necessary for the SCR system is either currently available to AES, the property owner and applicant, or AES will be installing the necessary improvements for the SCR equipment. 4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The existing AES power generating facility nor the proposed SCR system do not conflict with either public access or public recreation to coastal amenities. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00- 49: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 29, 2000 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to clearing and grubbing,the following shall be completed: a. Existing mature trees that are to be removed must be replaced at a 2-for-1 ratio with a 36- inch box tree or palm equivalent. Applicant shall provide a consulting arborist report on all the existing trees. Said report shall quantify, identify, size, and analyze the health of the existing trees. The report shall also recommend how the existing trees that are to remain(if any) shall be protected and how far construction/grading shall be kept from the trunk. b. Any work within the public right-of-way will require encroachment permits and traffic control plans prepared to City standards. 3. Prior to submittal for building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the index. (OOSR76)- 12/12/00 Attachment No. 1.16 p b. The Design Review Board and Planning Department shall review and approve plans for intensified landscaping around south and east property lines as required in Condition of Approval No. 4. f. c. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) 4. Prior to issuance of building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Submit 8 inch by 10 inch colored photographs of all colored renderings and elevations to the Planning Department for inclusion in the entitlement file. b. The applicant shall be responsible for construction the half-width street improvements along the Newland Street frontage of the project site as set forth in the City's letter dated September 23, 1997, from Melanie Fallon to Peter Lersey of SCE. As an alternative,the applicant may enter into an appropriate agreement,with accompanying security, which provides for a cash deposit to be made to the City to pay for the cost of designing and constructing the Newland Street frontage improvements. The City will handle the design and construction of a larger Newland Street widening project extending from Pacific Coast Highway northerly to Hamilton Avenue using the proportionate contribution from this project as well as from other projects having similar frontage improvement obligations. (PW) c. Water Ordinance No. 14.52,the "Water Efficient Landscape Requirements" apply for projects with 2,500 square feet of landscaping and lager. (PW) d. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. (PW) e. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection . (PW) f. Intensified landscape planting and irrigation shall be required for screening in addition to existing living material on site. Intensified landscaping shall be on the south boundary and the easterly (south-east)boundary. Owner shall make functional and obtain 100% coverage with the existing irrigation system. New systems may need to be added and dead or dying plant material shall be replaced. Plans shall include sections demonstrating how the ultimate growth of the plant material will help screen the existing plant. The landscaping and irrigation improvements shall be subject to review and approval of a landscape construction set by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works and Planning Departments. (PW) g. The widening and improvements of Newland Street will impact the landscape screening that exists along a portion of Newland Street. An estimate to re-landscape and intensify landscaping in those areas impacted by grading/construction will be generated by the (OOSR76)- 12/12/00 Attachment No. 1.17 Public Works Department and the costs will be added to the construction costs for Newland. The improvements will then be completed as a part of those street improvements. The improvements for landscape will be tied to the owners on-site system (irrigation) and all improvements shall be maintained continuously by the property owner. (PW) h. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location,type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials, an irrigation plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines. (PW) (Code Requirement) 5. During site development, and/or construction,the following shall be adhered to: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%) by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. f. Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity: 6. Prior to final building permit inspection, the following shall be completed: a. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including: 1) Landscaping; 2) Fire extinguishers shall be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards found in City Specification#424. (FD) (OOSR76)- 12/12/00 Attachment No. 1.18 3) Automatic fire sprinkler and fire alarm system may be required. Fire will need to meet with AES personnel to discuss entire system prior to final permit inspection. (FD) 4) Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification#401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. (FD) 5) Installation and/or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and HBFD requirements. Certain areas may require conformance to City Specification#431, Gas Fired Appliances. (FD) 6) This project shall comply with the Cal-ARP program for Hazardous Materials reporting. (FD) b. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. c. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. d. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire,pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 7. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall not become effective until the ten working day appeal period has elapsed. For projects in the appealable area of the coastal zone,there is an additional ten working day appeal period that commences when the California Coastal Commission receives the City's notification of final action. (OOSR76)- 12/12/00 Attachment No. 1.19 % r 1-- 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is December 12, 2001, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49 and Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15,pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. All applicable fees from the Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 7. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$43.00 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2)days of the Planning Commission's action. 8. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas,check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission. 9. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 10. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. (PV ) 11. A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Department prior to occupying the building. (OOSR76)- 12/12/00 Attachment No. 1.20 AES Huntington Beach Generating Station Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Installation Project- Narrative AES Huntington Beach, LLC (AES) proposes to install Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) at Huntington Beach Generating Station's Units 1 and 2. SCR will be used to reduce nitrogen oxide (NO.) emissions as part of AES' plan to meet the declining facility-wide NO,. emission allocation limits required by South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) Regional Clean Air Incentives Market(RECLAIM)Program. The Huntington Beach Generating Station property is approximately 23 acres (1,001,880 square feet) and operates 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. The Generating Station currently employees approximately 25 employees full-time. AES is initiating permit and review proceedings with the City of Huntington Beach for the proposed project in order to obtain California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, a Coastal Development Permit, a Conditional Use Permit, and Design Review. The proposed project at the Huntington Beach Generating Station consists of the installation of the following components: • Two SCR Reactor Units: The reactor units will be located in each of the two boiler exhaust ducts between the economizer and air heaters of Units 1 and 2. The units will include the installation of carbon steel assemblies comprised of four reactors, 26 feet long x 19 feet wide x 9 feet high. • Control Equipment: The SCR control equipment would be incorporated in to the existing plant distribution control system with new interface hardware. • Ammonia Source Component. The project uses ammonia as the principal NO. reducing agent. Generation of ammonia will be accomplished in one of two ways. The Preferred Approach is to general ammonia onsite using a Urea-to-Ammonia(U2A) generation process. The U2A system will require installation of a 20 ft. long by 8 ft. wide conversion skid and a 4 ft. long by 5 ft. wide pump skid and will utilize the existing on-site urea storage tanks. Refer to Section IX, Hazards and Hazardous Materials for a complete description of the U2A process. The solid urea will be transported to site every five days during the summer peak , months. The Alternate Approach is to utilize ammonia that is transported to and stored on-site. This will require two 10,000-gallon double walled carbon steel tanks that will contain 19 percent aqueous ammonia. The tanks will be installed above ground, in separate containment berms, and on an existing concrete pad currently occupied by two urea tanks. The urea tanks would be demolished and removed. An ammonia truck unloading facility is proposed immediately adjacent to the storage tanks. The truck facility will be a modification of the existing urea truck unloading facility. Nineteen percent aqueous ammonia will be transported to the site approximately every 7 days during the summer peak months. C:IWINDOWSITEMP\NMRATNEDOC�27-0CT-=DG' 1 AES Huntington Beach Generating Station Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Installation Project- Narrative (cont.) All new equipment will be located within the existing fenceline of the Huntington Beach Generating Station. The SCR Reactor Units will be encased in the existing duct works and will not be visible off-site. All other new components will be installed close to the boiler structures and will also not be visible off-site. A temporary construction laydown area will be located adjacent to Unit 4. The construction of the proposed project will occur between January and April of 2001. An outage, or shut down, of the Generating Station is scheduled to begin February 14, 2001. The SCR system is scheduled to be on-line in May of 2001. The construction of the proposed project will include a crew of approximately 30 temporary tradesmen. Construction equipment will include a boom truck, air tugger, eight pack welding machine and a crane. The operation of SCR requires use, resupply, and/or waste disposal of ammonia and catalyst.No water is required for the aqueous ammonia(Alternative Approach), however the U2A (Preferred Approach) will utilize approximately 1,700 gallons of water per day during peak summer months. No wastewater is generated during normal SCR operation. The catalyst, which is a honeycomb/air filter type of material, contains vanadium, tungsten, and titanium on a non- hazardous substrate. The guaranteed catalyst life is 3 years and requires replacement at the end of its useful life. The entire system will be designed in accordance with all applicable codes and standards. The land uses surrounding the Generating Station include: o North: Industrial, Public,Residential • South: Open Space, Commercial • East: Open Space • West: Residential, Commercial. The proposed project will reduce NO. emissions from Units 1 and 2 at the Generating Station and will benefit the entire population within the South Coast Air Basin. AES declares that the project site is not located within a Hazardous Waste and Substance site pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, as verified by Ricky Ramos (City of Huntingt n Beach, Planner). 0 3 h cz' Han Tan,AES Huntington Beach LLC Date C:\WINDOWS\TEMPWARRATNEDOC\27-0C'r-=SDG 2 ATTACHMENT City of Huntington Beach- 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building 536-5241 Planning 536-5271 September 23, 1997 Peter M.Lersey Southern California Edison 2244 Walnut Grove Ave. Rosemead, CA 91770 Re: Properties Located at 21730 Newland Street; Assessor Parcel Numbers: 114-150-16, 114-150-17,114-15044 and 114-160-56 Dear Peter, As we discussed at our September.12, 1997 meeting,the City of Huntington Beach continues to have concerns regarding the SCE facility located in our City. These concerns center around adequate landscaping and other design improvements to the power plant and street improvements to Newland Avenue. With the agreement that SCE will dedicate Newland to the City after the lot line adjustment has been processed and give a$50,000 contribution to the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy for landscaping improvements,we will not press any further concerns at this time. However,this letter will serve as notice to SCE and any future owner(s)that the City will be requiring improvements to this facility at the time of future permits. Any future development on properties presently owned by Southern California Edison and located at 21730 Newland Street in Huntington Beach,shall be subject to the requirements listed below. The Assessor Parcel Numbers of the properties are 114-150-16, 114-150-17, 114-150-44 and 114 160-56. The properties are located within Section 13;Township 6 South,Range 11 West,San Bernardino Base and Meridian,-in the Rancho Las Bolsas,in the City of Huntington Beach,County- of Orange, State of California. These properties will be subject to the City requirements at the time of the development,including but not limited to: 1. The developer shall construct improvements to the east one-half(40 feet)of Newland Street adjacent to the subject properties, consisting of but not limited to: a. The developer shall install new curb,gutter and sidewalk on the east side of Newland Street adjacent to the subject properties,per Public Works requirements. b. The developer shall remove and replace the existing paving to centerline on the east side of Newland Street adjacent to the subject properties,per Public Works requirements. A service life of 20 years shall be provided for. ATTACHMENT NO. 4. 1_� C. The proposed sidewalks on the east side of Newland Street adjacent to the subject properties shall meet A.D.A. and Public Works Standards as depicted on the site plan. d. The developer shall underground all existing dry utilities on the east side of Newland Street adjacent to the subject properties. e. Signing, striping and street lighting shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Public Works Standards. f. The developer shall install drainage facilities along the east side of Newland Street adjacent to the subject properties per Public Works Standards. g. The developer shall provide landscaping on the east side of Newland Street adjacent to the subject properties per City requirements. 2,' The developer shall provide intensified landscaping along t ie west side of the subject properties adjacent to Newland Street. The intent of the landscaping is to provide screening of the power generation facilities as seen from Pacific Coast Highway to the greatest extent possible. 3, The developer shall provide intensified landscaping along the south-east and east sides of the subject properties.The intent of the landscaping is to provide screening of the power generation facilities as seen from Pacific Coast Highway to the greatest extent possible. If I can answer any questions or be of any assistance,please let me know. Sincerely, ' Melanie Fallon Community Development Dire.ctor cc: Mayor and City Council Ray Silver,Assistant City Administrator Michael T.Uberuaga,City Administrator Les Jones,Public Works Director David Biggs,Economic Development Director Scott Hess,Senior Planner Howard Zelefsky,Planning Director Bob Fisher,Consultant (o:admIh971Mci) ATTACH "t- ENT NO. A 14. Edison & Sanitation M� 3hs `A. I�carit ..Staff E sa 1 ..,✓:W Vic+. &+s '': r t''.. ,o�� `+sr .. , . g APpl�cable Applieable Remarks Remarks a. Intensified landscaping should be provided to screens D industrial facilities ✓ �, �� c� g b. Entry gates should be landscaped c. Use of natural stone such as river rock is encouraged in perimeter wall design M z 14 RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Planning SUBJECT: Appeal of Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49/Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15/ Negative Declaration No. 00-09 (AES Power Generating Station) COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 , RCA ATUAG MENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Attached Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS' REVIEWED RETURNED FORWARDED Administrative Staff ( ) ( ) Assistant City Administrator (Initial) ( ) ( ) City Administrator (Initial) ( ) [City Clerk ( ) EXPLANATION FOR:,,RETURN OF ITEM.` , , Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use 02/20/01 19:38 FAX 7143741495 AES HUNTINGTON BEACH LLC 2002 Mnfington,'Peach, L.L.C. AW �N �CF r A OF February 20, 2001 Y. Mr.Howard Zelefsky Director of Planning City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA.92648 Dear Mr_ Zelefsky: We greatly appreciate the efforts of Staff and the Fire Department to enable Items D-2 to be on the agenda of tonight's City Council/Redevclopment Agency Meeting. ,A number of the conditions proposed by the Fire Department reflect an attempt to address some of these issues. Unfortunately,certain of these conditions are inconsistent with our understanding of the issues as discussed with the Fire Department. Perhaps more importantly, certain conditions appear to be impossible for AES to comply with as part of the SCR installation and operation_ As you know,this process has been accelerated due to the critical timing needs associated with the provisions of electricity- As a result,we only received the proposed condition,language late on Friday,February 16,2001. With the weekend and holiday, there was absolutely no time to address these concems raised by the language of the conditions. Thus, in order to provide an opportunity to continue to work with the Fire Department and to clarify the conditions discussed above,we respectfully request the hearing be extended until the next meeting_ Sincerely, Ed Blackford President AES Huntington Beach L.L.C. Cc: Mayor Pam Julien Houchen City Council Michael P. Dolder, Fire Chief 21730 Newland Street HuntYugtou Beach,CA 92646 Phone(714)374-1491 Fax(714)374-1495 ppeal of Planning Commission's oval of ND 00-09/CUP 00-49/CDP 00-15 February 20, 2001 z a- UNITS i S 2:STACK IN FOREGROUND,FACING WEST AES HUNTINGTON BEACH um Southland,LLC SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION(SCR) m INSTALLATION PROJECT LPX� CDM Mu 1 Huntington Beach all Selective Catalytic Reduction tem (SCR) — Units 1 and 2 educe nitrogen oxide emissions enerate ammonia via urea to ammonia rocess of Units 3 and 4 lication for Certification to CEC is commenting agency and is intervenor proposed on Units 3 and 4 2 Plannin Commission ussion ea and ammonia Ilution emissions immunity Safety ndscaping Wand Street Improvements blic Notification Procedures ning Commission approved ' request es of Concern monia health risks sign safety features; staff training monia reactor — vapor cloud plume odeling in/leak procedural plan ismic safety 3 Use Compatibility duce nitrogen oxide emissions neral Industrial Zoning hetics erall, negligible impact ban Design Guidelines ensify landscaping, widen Newland Street munity Safety and Benefits duce nitrogen oxide ggested conditions of approval D OF PRESENTATION 4 PROOF OF PUBLICATION _ NOTICE- IS HEREBY NOTICE OF GIVEN that initial PUBLIC HEARING environmental assess- BEFORE THE CITY menu for the STATE OF CALIFORNIA) processed COUNCIL OF THE.. .items-were processed CITY-OF and completed in ac- $S� HUNTINGTON cordance with the Cali- BEACH fornia Environmental NOTICE IS HEREBY; Quality Act. It was de- termined that Item #1; Co u n ty of Orange ) GIVEN that on Tuesday,, would not have any sig- February 20, 2001, at; nificant environmental; 7:00 p.m. .in the City I effects and that a Council Chambers, 1 negative declaration is I am a Citizen of the United States and a 2000 Main Street, Hunt- !warranted. Prior to ington Beach hol, the City 1 acting on the appeal,the! resident of the County aforesaid r• I am Council will d a public City Council must review hearing on the following and act on the negative' planning and zoning declaration. This over the age of eighteen years, and not a items: environmental assess-1 1. APPEAL OF PLAN ment is on file at the City''I party to or interested in the below NING COMMISSION. of Huntington Planning i APPROVAL OF CONDI- Deartment, 2000-Main' entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of TIONAL USE PERMIT I p Street, and is available NO. - 00-49/COASTAL 'for public inspection and the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT a DEVELOPMENT PER ,comment by contacting MIT NO. 00-15/; the Planning Depart- NEGATIVE DECLARA-; ment, or by telephoning,newspaper o general circulation, printed TION NO. 00-09 (AES g' b (714) 536-5271.POWER . and pu lished in the Cityof Huntington FACILITY: 'Appellant: ON FILE:ra,copyequest of the b` ) PP . proposed request is on City Council Member file m the City Clerk's Of- Beach, County of Orange, . State of Ralph Bauer Applicant: Lice, 2000 Main Street, Mr. Han Tan,AES Hunt- Huntington Beach, Cali- California, and that attached Notice is a fornia 92648, for inspec- tion mgton Beach, LLC, by the public.A copy true and complete copy as was printed 21730 Newland Street, of'the staff report will be; and published in the Huntington Beach Huntington.Beach, CA available to interested 926469Request: Appeal, Parties at the City and Fountain Valley issues of said of the Planning Com- Clerk's Office after Feb- mission's approval to in- A- rua 15,.2 TE ALL INTERESTED ' stall nitrogen oxide', PERSONS are invited to newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: emissions reduction, attend said hearing and equipment in two boilers express opinions or at the Huntington Beach submit evidence for or Power Generating Sta- against, the application tion. Location: 21730 as outlined above.If you Newland Street (north- challenge the City Coun-1 east of Newland and Pa- cil's action in court, youj cific 'Coast Highway) may be limited to'raismgi February 8 , 2001 Project Planner: Jane only those issues you orl James someone else raised at NOTICE IS-HEREBY .the public hearing de- GIVEN that Item#1 is 10- scribed in this notice, sated in the appealable) or,, in ,written cor-' jurisdiction of the respondence .delivered cludes Coastal bevelop- declare, under penalty of perjury, that Coastal Zone and in- ; ment Permit No. 00.15, to the City at,or prior to, the foregoing is true and correct. filed on July 27,2000,in the public hearing. If conjunction ,with. the ,there are any further above request. The questions please call the Coastal Development Planning Department at I Permit hearing consists 536-5271 and refer to! of.a staff report, public the above,items. Direct Executed on February 8 2001 hearing; City Council your written communica / discussion and action. tons to the City Clerk. at Costa Mesa California. Following City Council Connie Brockway, action, Item #1 may be City Clerk; appealed to the Coastal City of Commission pursuant-to Huntinggttoq,Beach Section 245.32 of the 2000 Main Street, 'Huntington -Beach I 2nd,Floor, Zoning and Subdivision Huntington Beach, Ordinance, or unless Ti- California 92648 tle 14, Section 13573 of 1 (714) 538-5227 the California.Adminis- Published-Huntington trative Code is .ap- Beach-Fountain Valley' 'Coastal The California Independent February t3, CCoasstaal Commission 2001 South Coast Area Office -022-427 Signature address is 200 Oceangate, loth Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802-4302, phone number: (310) 570-5071_- "Ede 02-oC-D1 Siva bz- o�-bD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, February 20, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑ 1. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-49/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 00-15/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-09 (AES POWER GENERATING FACILITY): Appellant: City Council Member Ralph Bauer Applicant: Mr. Han Tan, AES Huntington Beach, LLC, 21730 Newland Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Request: Appeal of the Planning Commission's approval to install nitrogen oxide emissions reduction equipment in two boilers at the Huntington Beach Power Generating Station. Location: 21730 Newland Street (northeast of Newland and Pacific Coast Highway) Project Planner: Jane James NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15, filed on July 27, 2000, in conjunction with the above request. The Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action. Following City Council action, Item #1 may be appealed to the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. The California Coastal Commission South Coast Area Office address is 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802-4302, phone number: (310) 570-5071. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that Item #1 would not have any significant environmental effects and that a negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the appeal, the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after February 15, 2001. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714)536-5227 ��. (gaega1s:01 cc0220) f CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST SUBJECT: y V0 , _ D O -D Ai� i �T1v�t DEPARTMENT: lll�4�1 13(0 MEETING DATE: CONTACT: ,KaIVI.Q. Sa1'YtQ, PHONE: X tp N/A YES NO Is the notice attached? Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council(and/or Redevelopment Agency)hearing? Are the date,day and time of the public hearing correct? ( ) ( } If an appeal,is the appeicant's name included in the notice? ( ) ( ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,does the notice include appeal language? Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? Is a map attached for publication? ( ) ( ) ( Is a larger ad required? Size ( ) (vf ( ) Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? ( ( ( } Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ( ) ( ) Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) I€Coastal Development Permit,is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing labels? ( ) to� ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,are the resident labels attached? ( ( ) ( ) Is the Report 33433 attached? (Economic Development Dept. items only) Please complete the following: 1. Minimum days from publication to hearing date 2. Number of times to be published 1 3. Number of days between publications 21 OWNERSHIP LIST CERTIFICATION FORM Attached to this certification form is a list of all property owners within a foot radius of the subject property as obtained from the latest Orange County Assessment Rolls. This list certifies to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signed: Donna Scales 684 S. Gentry Lane Anaheim, CA 92807 (714) 921-2921 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On this day of kTMLV1Y 200 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public commissioned for Los Angeles County, California, personally appeared Donna Scales known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same. WITNESS My hand and official seal Signature Thaniel Davidson y Comm.#713Ga83 Thaniel Davidson CC\ NOTARY PUBLIC CAL.1-RN1A C LOS ANGELES COiJti TY COMM- Name(Typed or Printed) Notary Comm.Exp.Apr'I 15,<<^007 Public in and for said State Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 OWNER: AES Huntington Beach,LLC 21730 Newland St.-ATTN: Han Tan Huntington Beach,CA 92646 i l01 1(Yiu hr� "DVt 51 C to Cur� So�ar�-t�D_t g'D CA 0171Doo CA 30 1 t MAVERYO Address Labels Laser 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-150-36,63,81,83,84,& 114-160-86 114-150-28,34,41,57,148-121-15,16,24, Southern California Edison Co. & 148-231-07 114-150-26,51,&55 ATTN: Mike Kromelow Orange County Flood Dept of Public Works, State of Calif 2244 Walnut Grove,Room 176 PO Box 4048 1025 P St. Rosemead,CA 91770 Santa Ana,CA 92702 Sacramento,CA 95814 148-121-17 City of untin Beach PO ox 19 nting on Beach, CA 92648 MAVERY(g) Address Labels Laser 5960TM PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST"B" MAILING LABELS—December 18,2000 G3abelsMabelAPublic Hearing President 1 Huntington os PO 10 FANS 16 H.B.Chamber of Commerce P.O.B 1 John Mile 2100 Main Street,Suite 200 Sun Bea 90742 19425 astlew Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92648 tin each,CA 92648 Judy I.egan 2 William D.Holman 11 Sue Johns 16 Orange County Assoc.of Realtors PLC 1967 e y Lane 25552 La Paz Road 19 Corporate Plaza Drive H tin n Beach,CA 92648 Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 President 3 Mr.Tom Zanic 12 Edna Littlebury 17 Amigos De Bolsa Chica New Urban West Gldn St Mob.Hm.Owners 1.eag 16531 Bolsa Chica Street,Suite 312 520 Broadway Ste.100 11021 Magnolia Blvd. Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Santa Monica,CA 90401 Garden Grove,CA 92642 Sunset Bea omm ty Assoc. 4 Pres.,H.B.Hist.Society----- 13 Pacific Coast ologiral 18 Pat Thi , re ' t C/O Newland House Museum Sodety,In PO 2 19820 Beach Blvd. P.O.B 109 each,CA 90742-0215 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 C M CA 92627 Attn.Jane Gothold President 5 Community Services Dept 14 County of O e/E 19 Huntington Beach Tomorrow Chairperson Mxhael ,Dir. PO Box 865 Historical Resources Bd. P.O, ox 8 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Ana,CA 92702-4048 g Julie Vand!Suffost 6 Council 15 County of ge 19 5' a;9 17 66 range9 a#100 each,CA 92648 P. 0 48 2714-67 44 aura CA 92702-4048 Richard Spicer 7 Jeff Metzel 16 Planning t 19 t818 G Seacliff o MA t 7 2th Floor 1939 had r Circle P. B 8 es,CA 90027 Beach,CA 92648 aata CA 92702-4048 E Ts.Co 00 8 John Roe 16 County of O /E 19 Marc mi A Tan -2 ood Cir. e Lane P U ox 8 ua=gton Beach,CA 92646 Beach,CA 92648 CA 92702-4048 Frank Caponi 9 118121 u one 16 Planning Dir. 20 Environmental Board Chairman f HO City of Costa Mesa 6662 Glen Drive Bluff Circle P.O.Box 1200 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200 2 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST"B" MAILING LABELS—December 18,2000 G:IabclsMabds\Public Hearing Planning Dir. 21 Dr.Duane Dishno 29 Country View EsPtcs HOA 37 City of Fountain Valley HB City School Dist. Carrie Tho 10200 Slater Ave. PO Bo 1 6642 T er ve Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Hun on Beach,CA 92626 H Beach CA 92648 Planning Director 22 Jerry Buchanan 29 - Country View Esta s HOA 37 City of Westminster HB City School Dist Gerald Cha 8200 Westminster Blvd. 20451 Lane 6742 S ' it Westminster,CA 92683 H on Beach,CA 92648 H each CA 92648 Planning Director 23 James Jones 30 HB Hamptoas A 37 City of Seal Beach Ocean View entary �1684 stone c P angmt Inc. 211 Eight St. School ct on Avenue,Suite 200 Seal Beach,CA 90740 1720 Lane ne, 92606 Hun' on Beach CA 92647 California Coastal Commission 24 Barbara W 31 Sally Graham 38 Theresa Henry Westmia �chtrict MeoeaSouth Coast Area Office 1412 e ue 5161 e 200 Oceangate,loth Floor Wes ' ter CA 92683 Htin' n Beach,CA 92649 Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 California Coastal Commission 24 ;Patricia K 32 Cheryle Browning 38 South Coast Area Office HB U ' Iiig ool Disrict Meadowlark 200 Oceangate,10th Floor 10 Yo wa Avenue 16771 R evelt e Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 Hun' on Beach,CA 92646 H each,CA 92649 r Robert Joseph 25 CSA 33 Hearthside Homes 39 Caltrans District 12 730 E ay#200 6 Executive Circle,Suite 250 3347 Michelson Drive,Suite 100 T 92680 Irvine,CA 92614 Irvine,CA 92612-0661 Director 26 i Golden o 34 Bolsa Chica Land Trust 40 Local Solid ste .Agy. Arta ed ens Nancy Donovan O.C.H C Agency 1 ldenwest St. 4831 Los Patos P.O. ox on Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Santa Ana,CA 92702 New Growth C r 27 OC County Harbors,Beach 35 Bolsa Chica Land Trust 40 Huntingt ea ost Office and Parks Dept. Evan Henry,President 6771 er e. P.O.Box 4049 1812 Port Tiffin Place H each,CA 92647 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Marc Esker 28 Huntingt 36 John Scott 41 Fountain a lementary School Dist Attu at rs-Laude SEHBNA 1721 eet 7 er Ave.#300 22032 Capistrano Lane F alley CA 92708 Hun on Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8309 FUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST"B" MAILING LABELS—December 18,2000 G1abe1s\Iabe1s\Public Hearing OC Sanitation District 41 Ed Blackford,President 41 John Ely 41 10844 Ellis Avenue AES Huntington Beach,LLC 22102 Rockport Lane Fountain Valley CA 92708 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Richard Loy 41 HB Coastal Communities Assoc. 42- Downtown Business Association_ 43 9062 Kahului Drive David Guido Mr.Steve Daniels Huntington Beach CA 92646 143 E.Meats Avenue 200 Main Street#106 Orange,CA 92865 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Downtown Residents Association 44 Chairperson. 45 Juaneao Band of Mission Indians 46 Ms.Marie St Germain Gabrieleno/ ,Tribal Council Acjachemea on 505 Alabama PO Bo 3 31411 fa a Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 S b ' 91778 S apistrano,CA 92675-2625 AYSO!1egi5147, 47 AYSO Regio3,143 47 AYSO Region 5 47 John a Commis ' VqxeDelany David S 9468 rm t Cr 505 s r 16 W stock Ln Fot6tak alley,CA 92708 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 untmgton Beach,CA 92647 i I AYSO Region 47 Fountain Valley Youth Baseball* 47 HB Field H y* 47 Commissi er derson Bret Harden dhiaz 9832 gs you 10222 :17W r.Huntington Beach,Ca 92646 Hun each,CA 92646 un oa Beach,CA 92647 Huntington ch Girls Softball* 47 H.B.Jr.All- rican Football** 47 HB Pop Warner tball** 47 Paul F and Joe Steven Sh an 17 G eaf 166 #3 P.O. x 5 Hun' on Beach,CA 92649 Hun" on Beach,CA 92647 Hun' Beach,CA 92615 Huntington ey Little League 47 Huntington B ch Soccer League* 47 North Huntington Beach Soccer Club* Renee er Felipe Z ata President 47 rge M 2 attf P.O ox�/ 1860 ew t.#94 Hun' on Beach,CA 92648 un n'tington Beach,CA 92648 Hu Beach,CA 92646 North HB cer Club 47 Ocean View a League 47 Robiawood a League 47 D-W tick F r Stev ec 2 1 rt 221 z 6692 r Hun' on Beach,CA 92646 un' oa Beach,CA 92646 Hun' on Beach,CA 92647 South Coast So6cer Club** 47 South HB Jr. SoftbaIl** 47 WoMpack Socce Club 47 Presid race s Marie E y President Hardin 996 anyon Rd P. oa 986 es r. un' on Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 F un alley,CA 92708 YMCA*—J. gan onarely-Stretch 47 YMCA Soc - ames rgan 47 7777 E . Av 210 7777 ger A 10 Hun' gtoa lch,CA 92647 HatingtowSeach,CA 92647 Smoottrfeed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-150-53 114-150-58,59i'721f73 114-150-62 STATE OF CALIF DEPT OF MILLS LAND & WATER CO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1025 P ST PO BOX 7108 3330 AVENIDA DEL PRESIDER SACRAMENTO CA 95814 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92615 SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 CA 114 /50-72 114-150-75 -18,7q,-f 8O 114-150-82 M L W ER CO1998 BEACH COAST PROPER. AES HUNTINGTON BEACH LL O B PO BOX 2262321730 NEWLAND ST HUNTACH 2615/ LONG BEACH CA 90801 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-160-69+55 114-160-70,_15,_77/D9i+84 114-160-791&qP 31,f92 DAISY E PICCIRELLI ENTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PACIFIC ENVIRO DESIGN 2675 DALE AVE 2501 PULLMAN ST 10681 FOOTHILL BLVD 340 SONOMA CA 95476 SANTA ANA CA 92705 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730 CA 114/60-83 11 -160-8 114-481-01 S FO IA ISY E ICCI LI TE TERRENCE BOSTON 50 2675 LE AV 22001 SUSAN LN SAN927 / SON CA 5476 � HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-481-02 114-481-03 114-481-04 HARRY D HOWELL JOAN J NASTO RETA C CAGLE PO BOX 251 22031 SUSAN LN 21572 OAKBROOK GENOA NV 89411 ` HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 MISSION VIEJO CA 92692 114-481-05 114-481-06 114-481-07 RAYMOND S COLE MARINA T VALSAMAKIS LEONARD & REBECCA LOPEZ 22061 SUSAN LN 22081 SUSAN LN 22091 SUSAN LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-481-08 114-481-09 114-481-10 �Ltir1 S• W lkl TE JOHN & DANA RYAN W I L L I AM J RILEY 22072 HULA CIR 22052 HULA CIR 22042 HULA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-481-11 114-481-12 114-481-13 KATHLEEN A MOONEY JOHN T GRAVES MARGARET E LOURTIE 22101 JONESPORT LN 22012 HULA CIR 332 HAWTHORNE ST HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 SOUTH PASADENA CA 91030 114-481-14 114-481-15 114-481-16 GARY L GUMBERT JUDY A LENIHAN FRANK R GANDARA 1� Sut2FS1�� 'kYFE, 22021 HULA CIR 22041 HULA CIR SEA L (��ACN CA OfD-I4b HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-481-17 114-481-18 114-481-19 JEFFREY A NELSON KENNETH C KIMBALL RICHARD W MORTIMER 22051 HULA CIR 22071 HULA CIR 9002 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 OAVERY(g) Address Labels Laser � 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-481-20 114-481-21 114-481-22 KOUROSH KHAVARI KE ITH TUCKER a b 2 C I }Z\STI I�IF DR• 9022 CHRISTINE DR 9032 CHRISTINE DR CA gZw4(, HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-481-23 114-481-24 114-481-25 STANLEY W MARRIOTT PHILIP J BEUKEMA ROBERT G DUTTON 9042 CHRISTINE DR 9052 CHRISTINE DR 9062 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646. HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-481-26 i 114-481-27 . 114-481-28 KARL E WYSOCKI FOAD JAHANSOUZ ELMORE E LORANGER 9072 CHRISTINE DR 9082 CHRISTINE DR 9092 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-481-29 114-481-30 1 4-481-33 ALIREZA D VAZIRI MARION S GOLFOS CI OF TINGTON BEAC 66 BALBOA CV 22161 WOOD ISLAND LN PO B 190 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTIN N BNENCH 92648 114-482-01 114-482-02 114-482-03 WILLIAM R ARNOLD VIVIAN WOEST AL S & JULIE GABRION 22002 SUSAN LN 22022 SUSAN LN 22032 SUSAN LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-482-04 114-482-05 114-482-06 OLIVER F THAYER GALE W HILLIS JACK R & LAURA BYRD 22042 SUSAN LN 22052 SUSAN LN 833 STONE POST RD HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 FALLBROOK CA 92028 114-482-07 114-482-08 114-482-09 J JOHNSTON FRIEDA KNERR MALCOLM L MAC KENZIE 22092 SUSAN LN 9061 CHRISTINE DR 9071 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-482-10 114-482-11 114-482-12 STEVEN J & KAREN HAYES ROBERT H MERRITT STEVEN L WILSON 9081 CHRISTINE DR 31886 VIA PATO 22081 SURFRIDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 T$ABUCO CANYON CA 92679 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-482-13 114-482-14 114-482-15 JEANE M FLEMING THOMAS W MORTIMER RICHARD N MAST 22061 SURFRIDER LN 22051 SURFRIDER LN 22041 SURFRIDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-482-16 114-482-17 114-482-18 CONSTANCE M COLE MICHAEL S & DONNA TRYON JAMES MASTERSON 22031 SURFRIDER LN 22021 SURFRIDER LN 9102 PLAYA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 //�� AVERYO Address labels Laser 596OTM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-482-19 114-491-01 114-491-02 JOE M CROOM RICHARD M FRASER JOEL T BREAULT 9112 PLAYA DR 22162 LAGUNA CIR 9231 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-491-03 114-491-04 114-492-01 ANTHONY G SANCHEZ RAYMOND J FOX BRYAN J VISNOSKI 9241 CHRISTINE DR 9261 CHRISTI'NE DR 22002 CAPISTRANO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646f HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-492-02 114-492-03 114-492-04 CHARLES V SMITH JOHN F SCOTT KEVIN H & JUDY RHOADES 22022 CAPISTRANO LN 22032 CAPISTRANO LN 22042 CAPISTRANO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-492-05 114-492-06 114-492-07 MILTON B DARDIS GLEDA R FROST JANE M OKIMOTO 22052 CAPISTRANO LN 22062 CAPISTRANO LN 22072 CAPISTRANO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-492-08 114-492-09 114-492-10 GEORGE W ROBERTS NHUNG T NGUYEN REX & DENISE ROCKWELL 22082 CAPISTRANO LN 22092 CAPISTRANO LN 22102 CAPISTRANO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 ` HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-492-11 114-492-12 114-492-13 STANFORD M ROSS MC COURT WILLIAM J TR JONATHAN J JENSWOLD 22112 CAPISTRANO LN 22122 CAPISTRANO LN 22142 CAPISTRANO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-492-14 114-492-15 114-492-16 JOHN E SCHEFFLER tAAR6AR.Ei MA2ZGl.A ,MARS" W 4bK%11A 'rRVAbT 22152 CAPISTRANO LN 9191 CHRISTINE DR PO BOX 419119 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 KANSAS CITY MO 64141 114-492-17 114-492-18 114-492-19 NATEE CHAIKUMNERD JOSEPH D MORTIMORE JAMES B CANNADY 18360 Prot. MON'tE AVE 22161 LAGUNA CIR 22151 LAGUNA CIR 'MCRC�P•N 1�\Ll� C{\ gSp3'1 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-492-20 114-493-01 114-493-02 TODD A POWLEY RAYMOND J SHANAHAN MARJORIE R DORN 22131 LAGUNA CIR 22001 CAPISTRANO LN 22021 CAPISTRANO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-493-03 114-493-04 114-493-05 RAYMOND P LEE RICHARD B WHITTINGTON JEFFREY K JONES 22031 CAPISTRANO LN 22041 CAPISTRANO LN 22051 CAPISTRANO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 aAVERY® Address Labels Laser 6 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-493-06 114-493-07 114-493-08 JAMES E CAVENER RAMONA S REISS RITA J MARCHETTI 22061 CAPISTRANO LN 22071 CAPISTRANO LN 22081 CAPISTRANO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-493-09 114-493-10 114-493-11 THOMAS R CONNELL PHILLIP H WADE " KATHERINE S GRIFF 22091 CAPISTRANO LN 22101 CAPISTRANO LN 22121 CAPISTRANO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-493-12 114-493-13 114-493-14 SCOTT J & JILL ERTZ GREGORY K HANSEN JAMES A THOMPSON 22131 CAPISTRANO LN 22141 CAPISTRANO LN 9171 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 ; ' HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-493-15 114-493-16 114-493-17 GREGORY H KILDOW HEATHER R KRISHER-LANTO RUTH E DONOVAN 9161 CHRISTINE DR 9141 CHRISTINE DR 20361 SEVEN SEAS LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-493-18 114-493-19 114-493-20 MARY S CROWLEY GLEN R SWANSON NOSRATOLA D VAZIRI 22122 ISLANDER LN 22102 ISLANDER LN 66 BALBOA CV HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 114-493-21 114-493-22 114-493-23 SHARON A INSLEY CLETUS F MOLACEK FREDERICK H PFAFF 22082 ISLANDER LN 22072 ISLANDER LN 22062 ISLANDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-493-24 114-493-25 114-493-26 ROLAND T CLARK GARY R BAILEY DAVID K SPECHT 22052 ISLANDER LN 22042 ISLANDER LN 22032 ISLANDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 ", HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-493-27 114-493-28 114-493-29 JUDITH I ANDERSON ROBERT J & KARLA THOMAS GEORGE D BRUNDIGE 22022 ISLANDER LN 9152 PLAYA DR 9142 PLAYA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-493-30 114-493-31 114-494-01 CHRISTOPHER M SPENCE POUL C ANDERSON : , THIERRY T DELAPRE 9132 PLAYA DR 8181 KINGFISHER DR 22041 ISLANDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-494-02 114-494-03 114-494-04 DOUGLAS M ODONNELL JAMES P HARTMAN FRANK T WALKER 22051 ISLANDER LN . 22061 ISLANDER LN 22071 ISLANDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON -BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 v AVERY@ Address Labels Laser '� 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-494-05 114-494-06 114-494-07 WILLIAM M ODONNELL MARK A CUTLER FRANK A VAN HERK 22091 ISLANDER LN 22101 ISLANDER LN 22111 ISLANDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-494-08 114-494-09 114-494-10 PENNY A DEMMON TERRY T TUTTLE CLIFFORD & PHYLLIS HALL 22121 ISLANDER LN 9121 CHRISTINE DR 9111 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 9264:6 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-494-11 114-494-12 114-494-13414 RICHARD D SWANSON JAMES K BERNSEN G G WOODS 9101 CHRISTINE DR PO BOX 384 22092 SURFRIDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-494-15 114-494-16 114-494-17 ROBERT J JANUSKA STEVE BRANDON VICKI WILDER 22072 SURFRIDER LN 22062 SURFRIDER LN 22052 SURFRIDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-494-18 114-495-01 114-495-02 POUL C ANDERSEN HELEN T VIALA ROBERT A IBBOTSON 8181 KINGFISHER DR 9272 CHRISTINE DR 9262 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-495-03 114-495-04 114-495-05 GUENTER T STEUER CHRISTOPHER L BUTTON ROBERT ABDELNABY 9252 CHRISTINE DR 9242 CHRISTINE DR 9232 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-495-06 114-495-07 114-495-08 ROBERT J SIMPSON LUCILLE A BAGNOLI RAVI GOVINDAN 9222 CHRISTINE DR 9562 HIGHTIDE DR 9202 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-495-09 114-495-10 114-495-11 FAROUK E SHAMOO FRED J GALLUCCIO JACK G & CINDY BUFFA 9192 CHRISTINE DR 9182 CHRISTINE DR 9172 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-495-12 114-495-13 114-495-14 MARSHALL E PAPKE TIMOTHY FISCHER GREGORY A BRENNER 9162 CHRISTINE DR 9152 CHRISTINE DR 9142 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 114-495-15 114-495-16 148-012-044_1 JOHN D BREDFELDT GARY C GORMAN CITY OF INGT EAC 9132 CHRISTINE DR 9122 CHRISTINE DR PO BO 90 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUN N N BEACH 92648 // LIVERY@ Address Labels laser �� 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 148-012-11 148- 12-12 148-071-01 SCHOOL HUNTINGTON BEACH C OF TING /13E JACK S GONTERMAN PO BOX 71 O BOX 90 21222 BRETON LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 HUNT GTON ACH HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-071-02 148-071-03 148-071-04 R05 SILI 69hNGERR BUDDY BARR KARL F ELLES 21232 BRETON LN 21242 BRETON LN 21252 BRETON LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 9264-6- HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-071-05 .: 148-071-06 148-071-07 JOSEPH V GALLO IRA S LEIBOWITZ CHARLES R LUKES 21272 BRETON LN 21282 BRETON LN 21292 BRETON LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-071-08 148-071-09 " 148-071-10 TERRY G LEHIGH STEVEN P RAKHSHANI ' GRACE A ANDERSON 21302 BRETON LN 21312 BRETON LN 21322 BRETON LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-071-11 148-071-12 148-071-13 JAMES P LARKIN JOHN D HOMAN DENNIS K AUSTIN 21332 BRETON LN 21342 BRETON LN 21554 NEWLAND ST HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 'HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-071-14 148-071-15 148-071-16 LINDA L TURNQUIST YONG C & HYON KIM BART A & LISA BARRETT 21362 BRETON LN 21372 BRETON LN 21382 BRETON LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-071-17 148-071-18 148-071-19 RICHARD S JONES ARNOLD S RITTBERG BILLY S HUMPHRIES 21392 BRETON LN 21402 BRETON LN 8732 HATTERAS DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-071-20 148-071-21 148-071-22 WILLIAM K GAMBLE PATRICIA A TESSIER MICHAEL R BUONO 301 E COOK ST E 8702 HATTERAS DR 8692 HATTERAS DR SANTA MARIA CA 93454 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-071-23 148-071-24 148-071-25 LEON A HART JOANN P STEVENS CHRISTOPHER BISTOLAS 8682 HATTERAS DR 8662 HATTERAS DR 8652 HATTERAS DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-071-26 148-071-27 148-071-28 RICHARD R BUTTON KENNETH E GEISERT CHARLES L LINDSAY 8642 HATTERAS DR 8632 HATTERAS DR 8622 HATTERAS DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 SAVERYO Address Labels Laser 11 5960TIl Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 148-072-01 148-072-02 148-072-03 RAMON E BOYD STEVE LALLY JACK A THOMPSON 9851 HOT SPRINGS DR 8652 SABLE DR 8642 SABLE DR , HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-072-04 148-072-05 148-072-06 KENNETH MCKAY RONALD S HODGE JOAN T HARDWOOD 11 CAPE DANBURY 8622 SABLE DR 8612 SABLE DR NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-072-07 148-072-08 148-072-09 HARRY T WILSON GLENN W GALLEGLY LAWRENCE N OLSON 8611 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 8621 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 230 CLIPPER WAY HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 SEAL BEACH CA 90740 148-072-10 148-072-11 148-072-12 KENNETH R KRENGEL GLENN T ERWIN JERALD C & LAURA IRVING 8641 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 8651 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 8661 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-073-01 148-073-02 148-073-03 PETER SAMSONOV ELISA P WENTWORTH DON R & MARTHA ALBRECHT 21281 BRETON LN 21282 YARMOUTH LN 21292 YARMOUTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-073-04 148-073-05 148-073-06 WILLIAM F SPEICHER FREDRIC M CHASSON DONNA ELLIOTT 21302 YARMOUTH LN 21312 YARMOUTH LN 21322 YARMOUTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-073-07 148-073-08 148-073-09 DAVID T & ELENA HEDLUND DAVID G & SANDRA SUTTON ROBERT J SMITH 21332 YARMOUTH LN 245 CLIPPER WAY 21352 YARMOUTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 SEAL BEACH CA 90740 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-073-10 148-073-11 148-073-12 WESLEY L SMITH PING H OEY JAMES M GRIFFITH 778 W VIA ESPIRITO SANT 32363 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 21382 YARMOUTH LN CLAREMONT CA 91711 BONSALL CA . 92003 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-073-13 148-073-14 148-073-15 MANUEL J CADIZ WILLIAM M MOLINE RONALD E WALTER 21392 YARMOUTH LN 21402 YARMOUTH LN 21401 BRETON LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-073-16 148-073-17 148-073-18 GEORGIA C ZICCARDI LUCIA N FLETCHER BEVERLY J WIESEN 21391 BRETON LN 21381 BRETON LN 21371 BRETON LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 GAVERY® Address Labels Laser 12, 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 148-073-19 148-073-20 148-073-21 VETERANS AFFAIRS CRAIG R & KAREN TOVATT MICHAEL J & ERIN KARAL 21361 BRETON LN 21351 BRETON LN 21341 BRETON LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-073-22 148-073-23 148-073-24 JAN P & BARBARA VARNER ALAN E MCCOY GARY R TIEDGEN 21331 BRETON LN 21321 BRETON LN 21311 BRETON LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646` HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-073-25 148-073-26 148-074-01 SEABURY DEVELOPMENT CO STEPHEN R & CATHY KENT ' BRIAN W LINDSEY PO BOX 7968 21291 BRETON LN 21281 YARMOUTH LN NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-074-02 148-074-03 148-074-04 JUDITH L WHITNEY DONALD T MILLER JAMES H KAA 21291 YARMOUTH LN 21301 YARMOUTH LN 21311 YARMOUTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-074-05 148-074-06 148-074-07 JOSEPH & MARY DRUCKER PATRICK B TIERNEY STEVEN WAKIMOTO 21921 HARBORBREEZE LN 21331 YARMOUTH LN 1182 N MICHIGAN AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 PASADENA CA 91104 148-074-08 148-074-09 148-074-10 MICHAEL K STRUCKHOFF MICHAEL J COOK MICHAEL K BARNETT 21351 YARMOUTH LN 21361 YARMOUTH LN 21371 YARMOUTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-074-11 148-074-12 148-074-13 BILLY E STEVENSON GAREN HANLON BARBARA P HENNESSEY 21381 YARMOUTH LN 21391 YARMOUTH LN 21401 YARMOUTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-081-01 148-081-02 148-081-03 TERESA J LEE STEVEN M MCKENDRY LESLIE L JEPSEN 21901 KIOWA LN 8562 SANDY HOOK DR 8552 SANDY HOOK DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-081-04 148-081-05 148-081-06 MARION M FUGET THOMAS M COWGER JOHN T CLARK 8542 SANDY HOOK DR 8532 SANDY HOOK DR 8522 SANDY HOOK DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-081-07 148-081-08 148-081-09 WAYNE A LEWIS LAWRENCE H AYERS GAY A BOYER 8512 SANDY HOOK DR 8502 SANDY HOOK DR 21441 ANTIGUA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 MAVERYO Address labels laser 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 148-081-10 148-081-11 148-081-12 WALTER P GUNKEL STANLEY H & LISA BRYSON KEITH C BELEW 21431 ANTIGUA LN 21421 ANTIGUA LN 21401 ANTIGUA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-081-13 148-081-14 148-081-15 KERRY E & LORRAINE SHAW STEVEN W KENNEDY DAVID L & PATRICIA BUSH 21391 ANTIGUA LN 21381 ANTIGUA LN 21371 ANTIGUA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 9264;6 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-081-16 148-081-17 � 148-081-18 DAVID C LUTHER DONALD P RUSSELL DANIEL R MYERS 21361 ANTIGUA LN 21351 ANTIGUA LN 21341 ANTIGUA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-081-19 148-081-20 148-081-21 TULL W TAYLOR RALPH J CARNEVALE HARRY F BREMMER 21331 ANTIGUA LN 2725 LONG MEADOW DR ' 21311 ANTIGUA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 TIMBERVILLE VA 22853 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-081-22 148-081-23 148-081-24 GARY D & PATTI CRAWFORD CHERYL S TOGHIA LA V SPENCE 21301 ANTIGUA LN 21291 ANTIGUA LN 940 S COAST DR 100 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 COSTA MESA CA 92626 148-082-11 148-082-12 148-082-13 HOANG & AILEEN NGUYEN CHRISTINE M PATTISON JAMES 0 & DARLENE HAGAN 8521 MILNE DR 21372 ANTIGUA LN 21362 ANTIGUA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-082-14 148-082-15 148-082-16 FREDERICK B SCOTT WILLIAM H LAMSON ARTHUR R AZPEITIA 21352 ANTIGUA LN 21342 ANTIGUA LN 21332 ANTIGUA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-082-17 148-082-18 148-082-19 AHMET ALIYAZICIOGLU GARY B STARLING DAN L SCHAMBER 21322 ANTIGUA LN 21312 ANTIGUA LN 21302 ANTIGUA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-082-20 148-082-21 148-082-22 ROBERT BROWNING DAMON A & JULIE SMYTHE PAUL J GOODWIN 21882 OCEANVIEW LN 21282 ANTIGUA LN 21281 SAND DOLLAR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-082-23 148-082-24 148-082-25 JAMES T BAILEY CRAIG M MORTON MICHAEL J SUPPLE 21291 SAND DOLLAR LN 21301 SAND DOLLAR LN 21311 SAND DOLLAR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 GAVERYO Address Labels Laserl� 5960TM Smooth Feed Sheets TM Use template for 51600 148-082-26 148-082-27 148-082-28 RUDOLPH J FRIENDT DAVID H WILLIAMS GARY D & CAROLYN SMITH 21321 SAND DOLLAR LN 21331 SAND DOLLAR LN 21341 SAND DOLLAR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-082-29 148-082-30 148-082-31 ALI A MALEKZADEH STEVEN J WARDLE JERRY D WEBB 21351 SAND DOLLAR LN 21361 SAND DOLLAR LN 21371 SAND DOLLAR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-082-32 148-082-33 148-083-01 JEAN ICHKHAN EDWARD F WILLIAMS NICK BRIDWELL 8541 MILNE DR 8531 MILNE DR 8501 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-083-02 148-083-03 148-084-01 JEFFREY R SANDFORD VIVIAN M BLACKMORE DANIEL M BRAUN 8511 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 23442 VILLENA 9172 KAHULUI DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 MISSION VIEJO CA 92692 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-084-02 148-084-03 148-084-04 YOSHI & NORMA ADACHI DAVID P CHANG LOUISE W LO 16241 WATSON CIR 6476 SAN ANDRES AVE 1420 PALM AVE B WESTMINSTER CA 92683 rCYPRESS CA 90630 SAN GABRIEL CA 91776 148-084-05 148-084-06 148-084-07 ROY T SAKAMOTO WNIra RS, GA R1l NEDAL A ABDELMUTI 8561 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 3114 BdSTON�PcN �1?• 101 MAIN ST HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 LDb A'-NK%T0%o CA J0120 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 148-084-08 148-085-01 148-085-02 VERLAINE M STOREY JOHN L GALLIGHER ERIKA NOLLAU 8531 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 21282 SEAFORTH LN PO BOX 606 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 KAILUA KONA HI 96745 148-085-03 148-085-04 148-085-05 JUDITH M SCHROEDER RAYMOND E MILLARD KATHLEEN M HAMBORG 21302 SEAFORTH LN 21312 SEAFORTH LN 21322 SEAFORTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-085-06 148-085-07 148-085-08 CONG C DINH STEPHEN STAGNARO DENNIS J KRAUS 21332 SEAFORTH LN 21342 SEAFORTH LN 21352 SEAFORTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-085-09 148-085-10 148-085-11 JUDY A BOSINOFF TODD L JOHNSTON DAVID C DOMINGUEZ 21362 SEAFORTH LN , 21372 SEAFORTH LN 21382 SEAFORTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 SAVERYO Address Labels Laser { 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 148-085-12 148-085-13 148-086-01 NORMAN D EHRKE MORRIS B SPELL SCOTT L JOHNSTON 21392 SEAFORTH LN 21402 SEAFORTH LN 21281 SEAFORTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-086-02 148-086-03 148-086-04 LLOYD G AANENSEN WILLIAM P TONIC GARY L BARTZ 301 LINDO AVE 21301 SEAFORTH LN 21311 SEAFORTH LN NEWPORT BEACH CA 92661 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-086-05 148-086-06 148-086-07 DONALD P CONVERY JAMES J WEEPIE LYDIA K FAHILGA 21321 SEAFORTH .LN 21331 SEAFORTH LN 21341 SEAFORTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-086-08 148-086-09 148-086-10 MICHAEL & TRACY TESSIER MICHAEL T KADAU MICHAEL M OGAN 21351 SEAFORTH LN 21361 SEAFORTH LN 21371 SEAFORTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-086-11 148-086-12 148-086-13 MARTHA H BAIRD JOSEPH A BUSZEK 8f-S$E,% L&ANtrawe 21381 SEAFORTH LN 21391 SEAFORTH LN 20401 SEAFORTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-086-14 148-086-15 148-086-16 cf,c%t. SANDERS PHILLIP S DIMENTO DOLORES J ELLISON 21421 SEAFORTH LN 21431 SEAFORTH LN 21441 SEAFORTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-086-17 148-086-18 148-086-19 JOANN M DICKENS ANDREW J BUMATAY DONALD E STACK 8561 SANDY HOOK DR 8551 SANDY HOOK DR 8541 SANDY HOOK DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-086-20 148-086-21 148-086-22 JERRY WELLS VIRGIL J BUTLER MICHAEL W SELNA 8531 SANDY HOOK DR 8521 SANDY HOOK DR 6284 FORESTER DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 17TINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 148-086-23 148-086-24 148-086-25 . MICHAEL 0 DANGOTT PHILLIP & JUDY HOUSEMAN REYNALDO L LOPEZ 8532 MILNE DR 8542 MILNE DR 8552 MILNE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-086-26 148-086-27 148-086-28 REFUGIO G APODACA JOHN T CLEARY GORDON D AKERS 8562 MILNE DR 21392 SAND DOLLAR LN 21382 SAND DOLLAR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 MAVERYO Address labels Laser )(�' 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 148-086-29 148-086-30 148-086-31 JOSEPH RUBENS JOSEPH D LAGANA JOEL M & SHARY CASS 21372 SAND DOLLAR LN 21362 SAND DOLLAR LN 21352 SAND DOLLAR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-086-32 148-086-33 148-086-34 YEN-NING WANG RONALD R WILSON BRUCE M PULCINI 21342 SAND DOLLAR LN 20122 GLACIER CIR 21322 SAND DOLLAR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-086-35 148-086-36 148-086-37 JEANIE C BOYNTON THOMAS WITHERBY JILLIAN A FABIAN 21312 SAND DOLLAR LN 21302 SAND DOLLAR LN 21292 SAND DOLLAR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 148-086-38 148-121-01 148-121-03 JOSEPH FROLICH BERNARD B KAPLAN TARNUTZER al . SAA 0901,d R. 1,N• 8881 BELLSHIRE DR 1601 DOVE ST 160 MNNrt• ®EAGE1 CA gtV4b HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 i 148-121 4 148-121-18 148-121-19+20 CITY H INGTON BEAC NUBOARD RECYCLING INC PAUL B SANDGREN 63 T 8601 EDISON AVE 3722 HIGHWAY M IN N BCH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 CABOOL MO 65689 148-121-21 148-121-22 , 21 148-121- 3 ARTHUR K BRIMLOW NABIL & SUZAN NASRE NABIL SR 652 E CULVER AVE 21632 NEWLAND ST 2163 NE AND ST ORANGE CA 92866 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUN NGT N BEACH 92646 149-011-01 149-011-02 149-011-03 BILL MALAVASI GUY A & VICTORIA ADAMS RONALD C & KAREN JETT 9001 BERMUDA DR 9021 BERMUDA DR 9031 BERMUDA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-011-04 149-011-05 149-011-06 ALBERT J ASHURST WESLEY H GRAY JAMES R OLSEN 9051 BERMUDA DR 29020 116TH ST E 9081 BERMUDA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 L ;TTLEROCK CA 93543 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-011-07 149-011-08 149-011-09 CATHERINE C PHAM THERESA J NORTON WILLIAM H STILWELL 9091 BERMUDA DR 9101 BERMUDA DR 9111 BERMUDA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-011-10 149-011-11 149-011-12 KENT & KYLE MC GARRIGLE BURRIS R SUTTON KEVIN M COLEMAN 9121 BERMUDA DR 9131 BERMUDA DR 9141 BERMUDA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 11AVERY0 Address Labels Laser t7 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 149-011-13 149-011-14 149-011-15 JODY R RODGERS DANIEL F GAETA ROBERT J HINES 9151 BERMUDA DR 9161 BERMUDA DR 9171 BERMUDA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-011-16 149-012-01 149-012-02 ROBERT J PENGILLY SHELLY GAERTNER ALVA L BATTENFIELD 16264 SUMMERSHADE DR 21802 KIOWA LN 21782 KIOWA LN LA MIRADA CA 90638 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646', HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-012-03 149-012-04 149-012-05 DONALD J ZALESKI ROBERT DAYYATT ROBERT E AYRER 21772 KIOWA LN 9062 BERMUDA DR 9082 BERMUDA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-012-06 149-012-07 149-012-08 SCOTT TRACY DENNIS R MCDONALD DAVID W RABJOHN 9092 BERMUDA DR 9102 BERMUDA DR 9112 BERMUDA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-012-09 149-012-10 149-012-11 MICHAEL J MONAGHAN THOMAS D RIDLEY GEORGE RIVADENEYRA 20542 PAISLEY LN 9132 BERMUDA DR 9142 BERMUDA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 � HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 I 149-012-12 149-012-13 149-012-14 BARBARA R CHRISPIN STEVEN R & TARI SIMON CRAIG R WAGNER 9152 BERMUDA DR 9162 BERMUDA DR 9172 BERMUDA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-012-15 149-012-16 149-012-17 MICHAEL C MCVICKER HUBERT V ARMSTRONG BRIEN C BRAUN 9192 BERMUDA DR 9191 KAHULUI DR 9171 KAHULUI DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-012-18 149-012-19 149-012-20 MAX F LIPPKA GAIL R SUMMERS RANDALL W COCHRAN 9161 KAHULUI DR 9151 KAHULUI DR 9141 KAHULUI DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-012-21 149-012-22 149-012-23 JOHN P MURPHY OLE T OLESON PETER T PARKOVICH 9131 KAHULUI DR 9121 KAHULUI DR 9111 KAHULUI DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-012-24 149-012-25 149-012-26 DONALD L SCHLIETER WALTER R COYLE GREGORY W FINCK 9101 KAHULUI DR 9091 KAHULUI DR 9081 KAHULUI DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 SAVERYO Address Labels Laser 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 149-012-27 149-013-01 149-013-02 NEAL J RIEFFANAUGH CLARENCE F BALLENGER HILDE F GRANTHAM 909 TILLER WAY 21771 KIOWA LN 21781 KIOWA LN CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-013-03 149-013-04 149-013-05 LOUIS D KASTORFF JEFFERY M MANG DONALD G HOLMES 21801 KIOWA LN 21811 KIOWA LN 21821 KIOWA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-013-06 149-014-01 149-014-02 JAMES G & ANNE WRIGHT MICHAEL C STRACNER KEITH D & AMY SEWARD 21831 KIOWA LN 21822 KIOWA LN 21832 KIOWA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-014-03 149-014-04 149-014-05 RICHARD B & TROANN LOY WILLARD E TOLLES MARY J KEEFER 9062 KAHULUI DR 9082 KAHULUI DR 9092 KAHULUI DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-014-06 149-014-07 149-014-08 JOHN D CARSON ROSE M THURSTON JOHN F & LENORE KIRKORN 9102 KAHULUI DR 9112 KAHULUI DR 9122 KAHULUI DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-014-09 149-014-10 149-014-11 STEVEN W HANSEN LARRY S POE EDWARD V GARNETT 9132 KAHULUI DR 9142 KAHULUI DR 9152 KAHULUI DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-014-12 149-014-13 149-014-14 HOWARD GEOGHEGAN DANIEL M BRAUN BRIAN T & PAMELA LEWIS 9162 KAHULUI DR 9172 KAHULUI DR 9192 KAHULUI DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-015-01 149-015-02 149-015-03 GEORGE & CHRISTINE HIGI BARBARA R GIERHART RONALD P & DILLYS MAHER 21742 KANEOHE LN 21752 KANEOHE LN 21762 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-015-04 149-015-05 149-015-06 GLORIA S MOONEY ROBERT G & SUSAN WELLS NASSER G MUSTAFA 21772 KANEOHE LN 21792 KANEOHE LN 21802 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-015-07 149-015-08 149-015-09 SAMUEL T WINES ROBERT T RODENBECK GARY L & SHARON YOUNG 21812 KANEOHE LN 21822 KANEOHE LN 21832 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 OAVERY(g) Address Labels Laser 19 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 149-015-10 149-021-01 149-021-02 ROBERT B BURGER TNTItwN AIPM&4, EDWARD W ANDERSON 21842 KANEOHE LN 21842 KIOWA LN 9061 MAHALO DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-021-03 149-021-04 149-021-05 ROBERT J FRYE DONALD C EVANS HAROLD E LOOMIS 9081 MAHALO DR 9091 MAHALO DR 9101 MAHALO DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-021-06 149-021-07 149-021-08 MARIA I LORENTE ROSEMARY PETERSON AJIT S GILL 9111 MAHALO DR 9121 MAHALO DR 9571 YELLOWSTONE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-021-09 149-021-10 149-021-11 FRANK B GOODALE ROBERT J FISHER TIMOTHY C SHIELDS 9141 MAHALO DR 9151 MAHALO DR 9161 MAHALO DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-021-12 149-021-13 149-022-01 T440410 --*vt4 Wbri0XV JERRY W WHEELER GUY R MARTIN 9171 MAHALO DR 9191 MAHALO DR 21882 KIOWA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-022-02 149-022-03 149-022-04 CHARLES P PRIDDY DAVID E "NELSON JOHN E & JEANIE ENGH 21872 KIOWA LN 21862 KIOWA LN 9062 MAHALO DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-022-05 149-022-06 149-022-07 LISA ANGELICI JAMES A FAST STEPHEN M BRINKERHOFF 8575 WADE RIVER CIR 9082 MAHALO DR 9092 MAHALO DR FOUNTAIN VALLEY C 92708 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-022-08 149-022-09 149-022-10 M D & CLETA KEITH PAUL H STRAIN WILHELM E KEIMEL 9102 MAHALO DR toss'E• gPGP►OWA`I� V►Nlt zw 518 BARSBY ST HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 yOA(pO SftVA L*% 1003 VISTA CA 92084 149-022-11 149-022-12 149-022-13 DOUGLAS M WATLAND LARRY & SUE MC GREGOR HELENA R BOWEN 9142 MAHALO DR 9152 MAHALO DR 9162 MAHALO DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-022-14 149-022-15 149-022-16 MARIANNE THOMAS VERNON J GUINAN ROBERT K & CAROLYN LOY 200 S LAMAR ST 1050 9192 MAHALO DR 9191 KAPAA DR JACKSON MS 39201 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 aAVERY@ Address Labels Laser Zo 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 149-022-17 149-022-18 149-022-19 GARY R NICCOLE GARY G CHOUGH JAMES R HOOPER 286 E GREENGATES DR- ' (*01 DC.leik.N 11CO-4kCE 9151 KAPAA DR. CORONA CA 91709 H%L*i'I, PyEhCk! CAL qz y q HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-022-20 149-022-21 149-022-22 DEAN L CORDELL MORTIMER P SHEA PETER I CANOVA 9141 KAPAA DR 9121 KAPAA DR 9111 KAPAA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-022-23 149-022-24 149-022-25 THOMAS A GRABIEL KENNETH W WHITEHEAD GORDON B EMERSON 9101 KAPAA DR 9091 KAPAA DR 9081 KAPAA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-022-26 149-022-27 149-023-01 Pu►g►1�s KR }h1�i E 1�I DONALD E & TAMARA BAKER LEE N HUPP ��4t _1'�1D11J�g�FRy�;b414"y 21141q cloEv Y44 1pR. 21841 KIOWA LN .ST�A�NST __.G� gt:{r�3 irV1C1�1NNEy, ZUO& 7S070 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-023-02 149-023-03 149-023-04 VINTON D MARRIOTT ISOLDE L WITTMAN RICHARD K SVOBODA 21851 KIOWA LN 4651 W CRESTVIEW CIR 21871 KIOWA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 TUCSON AZ 85745 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 j 149-023-05 149-023-06 149-023-07 DANIEL E MALLOY MICHELE M ERWIN TERESA J LEE :A`881 KIOWA LN 21891 KIOWA LN 21901 KIOWA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 I _ _ 149-023-08 149-023-09 149-023-10 ANITA P WELLS PAUL S HOWARD FARES JAHSHAN 21911 KIOWA LN 21931 KIOWA LN 21941 KIOWA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-023-11 149-023-12 149-023-13 DONALD J MCKINNEY RICHARD A & DE KILEKAS MANUEL T URZUA 21961 KIOWA LN 9022 ALOHA DR 9042 ALOHA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-023-14 149-023-15 149-023-16 RALPH' L OSTERKAMP RICHARD T LEGERE RUTH E MORTON 9052 ALOHA DR 9062 ALOHA DR 9082 ALOHA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-023-17 149-023-18 149-023-19 STEPHEN WILLERTH HERMAN P & IRIS CHENIER MARK A & SUSAN SEMON 9092 ALOHA DR 9102 ALOHA DR 9112 ALOHA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 13AVERY(g) Address Labels Laser 2 ( 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 149-023-20 149-024-01 149-024-02 NEIL L & LORI WELLS ALAN BRAMLETT KIM FINLAY 9122 ALOHA DR 21932 KIOWA LN 21912 KIOWA' LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-024-03 149-024-04 149-024-05 BRENT C & JANET KOOIMAN DANIEL L RAWLINS RAFAEL B RODRIGUEZ 21902 KIOWA LN 9062 KAPAA DR 9072 KAPAA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-024-06 149-024-07 149-024-08 YUNG H PAN ALLEN K WACHI <%,-#tNNE PO BOX 6094 9092 KAPAA DR 9102 KAPAA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92615 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-024-09 149-024-10 149-024-11 GEORGE T JENKINS DARLENE J HANSON JOHN D BARRY 9112 KAPAA DR 9122 KAPAA DR 9142 KAPAA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-024-12 149-024-13 149-024-14 ROD A RASMUSSEN MARCELLA V GRAHAM HAROLD S CORDOVA 9152 KAPAA DR 9162 KAPAA DR 9172 KAPAA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-024-15 149-024-16 149-024-17 JOHN A MCCARTHY OLIVER A MINEAR JOHN T KELENC 9192 KAPAA DR 9191 ALOHA DR 9171 ALOHA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-024-18 149-024-19 149-024-20 THOMAS G LAMBERT NORBERT VILLANYI DOLORES E MILLER 9161 ALOHA DR 9151 ALOHA DR 9141 ALOHA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 ' HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-024-21 149-024-22 149-024-23 KIRK & HEATHER TOBLER RICHARD E MCKEE MAIDA A SEYMOUR 9121 ALOHA DR 9111 ALOHA DR 9101 ALOHA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HU=INGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-024-24 149-024-25 " 149-024-26 JOAN KLUBNIK JERRY A STRONER GEORGE F BULLOCK 9091 ALOHA DR 9081 ALOHA DR 9071 ALOHA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-024-27 149-025-01 149-025-02 HENRY B KERFOOT BORIS M ACKERMAN GORDON E WEAVER 9061 ALOHA DR 73 LINDA ISLE 21862 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 SAVERY(g) Address labels Laser 2--2-5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 149-025-03 149-025-04 149-025-05 PAUL S SANDNESS HOWARD C FRITZSCHE AUGUSTINE R PEPI 21872 KANEOHE LN 21892 KANEOHE LN 21902 KANEOHE. LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-025-06 149-025-07 149-025-08 MITCHELL E SLAGLE KURTIS M NII LEONARD S SKOCZEN 21912 KANEOHE LN 21922 KANEOHE LN 21932 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-025-09 149-025-10 149-025-11 MARK H BOYER NOEL T MARTINEAU PETER & BETTY MANDICH 21942 KANEOHE LN 9202 ALOHA DR 9192 ALOHA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-025-12 149-025-13 149-025-14 GREGORY FREEZE DENNIS L PARKER GREGORY D SNYDER 9182 ALOHA DR 9722 MELINDA CIR 9152 ALOHA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-025-15 149-031-01 149-031-02 PAUL & DONNA METZLER CUONG P & KHANH LE MARK & JANET BOWMAN 9142 ALOHA DR 9091 REGATTA DR 9081 REGATTA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-03 149-031-04 149-031-05 KARL & HEIDI TAHTI RANDY J LACK STEVE A MARTIN 9071 REGATTA DR 9061 REGATTA DR 9041 REGATTA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-06 149-031-07 149-031-08 LEON T MADNICK ROBERT L WILSON JAMES L HARRINGTON 9031 REGATTA DR 9021 REGATTA DR 9001 REGATTA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-09 149-031-10 149-031-11 FRANCILE JUHL CECIL E WALLIS GEORGE P JOHNSON 9002 REGATTA DR 9022 REGATTA DR 9032 REGATTA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-12 149-031-13 149-031-14 KENNETH L CRITES DON A KIM EDMUND S MORENO 9042 REGATTA DR 9062 REGATTA DR 9072 REGATTA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-15 149-031-16 149-031-17 ROBERT J LOW BRUCE L SCHECHTER FORREST K HARRELL 9082 REGATTA DR 9092 REGATTA DR PO BOX 5051 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92615 AVERYO Address Labels Laser�3 5960TM Smooth Feed Sheets TM Use template for 51600 149-031-18 149-031-19 149-031-20 ROBIN J NAKATSUKA MARY J SINDEL TEDDY J & KAREN POBUD 9081 BOBBIE CIR 9071 BOBBIE CIR 9061 BOBBIE` CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-21 149-031-22 149-031-23 EDWARD VELAZQUEZ HENRY J & TONI BAEZ STEVEN A & DEBRA CLARK 9041 BOBBIE CIR 9031 BOBBIE CIR 9021 BOBBIE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646' HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-24 149-031-25 149-031-26 WARREN M BISCAILUZ WALLACE D TORKELLS JAMES C & SANDRA TYLER 9001 BOBBIE CIR 9002 BOBBIE CIR 9022 BOBBIE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-27 149-031-28 149-031-29 BEVERLY J MARKLE CHRISTINA J PIERCE VILLA JOHN P & SONIA 9032 BOBBIE CIR 9102 BELCARO DR 9062 BOBBIE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-30 149-031-31 149-031-32 ALBERT J KOZISCHEK HENRY S WHEATLEY # WILLIAM E & CAROL WARD 9072 BOBBIE CIR 900 PACIFIC COAST HWY 31& 9092 BOBBIE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-33 149-031-34 149-031-35 THOMAS C BOWLES JOHN & SUSAN SHEEDY SAMUEL J LAFATA 9091 NIGUEL CIR 9081 NIGUEL CIR 9071 NIGUEL CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-36 149-031-37 149-031-38 DARREN MAGOT ROBERT G DEMPSEY JAMES R YOUNG 9061 NIGUEL CIR 9041 NIGUEL CIR 9031 NIGUEL CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-031-39 149-031-40 149-032-01 DAVID & LUCI SCHOFIELD JAMES L SIMPSON HARRY & LINDA GAYNOR 9021 NIGUEL CIR 9001 NIGUEL CIR 9111 REGATTA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-032--02 149-032-03 149-032-04 JOSE N & SERGIO RIVAS i' RWTH "09.E JUDY M HOHL 9121 REGATTA DR 9131 REGATTA DR 9141 REGATTA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-032-05 149-032-06 149-032-07 CARLOS R STEMEN FLORENCE T RADACK CRAIG T TAYLOR 9161 REGATTA DR 9171 REGATTA DR 9181 REGATTA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 G 1 AVERY3 Address Labels Laser 4 5960TM Smooth Feed Sheets TM Use template for 51600 149-032-08 149-032-09 149-032-10 RICHARD J BAYLIS WILLIAMS 13ENNYWORTH BRUCE W MUNN 9191 REGATTA DR 21522 KANEOHE LN 21532 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-032-11 149-032-1241.3 149-032-14 VETT� 3R�y JAMES R GALLAGHER AUDREY L ANDRADE (p$�jZ 61Vt�1GSTOAt PR 21562 KANEOHE LN 21582 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646$ HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-032-15 149-032-16 149-032-17 DONALD S WEINTHAL LEONARD ZUSMAN JAMES D PLUNKETT 21592 KANEOHE LN 21602 KANEOHE LN 11232 HUNTING HORN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 9264 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 SANTA ANA CA 92705 149-032-18 149-033-01 149-033-02 JOAN CLARK LAN N NGUYEN FRANCIS M HOVIS 21622 KANEOHE LN 9182 REGATTA DR 9172 REGATTA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-033-03 149-033-04 149-033-05 GORDON L CHILDERS CHRISTOPHER CATALDO MARJORIE M BENDEES- 9162 REGATTA DR 9142 REGATTA DR 9132 REGATTA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-033-06 149-033-07 149-033-08 BENJAMIN E BURLEY CAROL N RUTHERFORD JAMES T & VICKI BIRK 9122 REGATTA DR 9112 REGATTA DR 21562 POLYNESIAN LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-033-09 149-033-10 149-033-11 LEONARD A BOSE ANTHONY L NEMELKA SU-TSO & JUN-JUN CHEN 21572 POLYNESIAN LN 18225 S BROOKHURST 19-37 21891 VACATION LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 FOUNTAIN VALLEY C 92708 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-033-12 149-033-13 149-033-14 DIANE C ARGE MICHAEL F ROSS ALAN C HOLST 21602 POLYNESIAN LN 21612 POLYNESIAN LN 21611 BAHAMA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-033-15 149-033-16 149-033-17 LAWRENCE PRITCHETT RICHARD M SCHNUR RUTH A BATES 21601 BAHAMA LN 21591 BAHAMA LN 21581 BAHAMA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-033-18 149-033-19 149-033-20 ROBERT E CHARLETON DOREEN L RICE MARK HAKIM-DAVAR 21571 BAHAMA LN 9141 HAITI DR 28225 LA BAJADA HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 SAVERY0 Address Labels Laser GS5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 149-033-21 149-033-22 149-034-01 DONALD P LEAVEY GREGORY L MACIAS WALTER E ROST 9171 HAITI DR 9181 HAITI DR 21592 BAHAMA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-034-02 149-034-03 149-034-04 HAROLD D ELDRIDGE MARK DIXON FRED E & VICKIE BENNETT 21602 BAHAMA LN 21612 BAHAMA LN 21622 BAHAMA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-034-05 149-034-06 149-034-07 EDWARD J METSCH THOMAS A & CAROL WELCH JAMES L MCNERNEY 21621 KANEOHE LN 21611 KANEOHE LN 1771 CRESTVIEW AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 ; SEAL BEACH CA 90740 149-034-08 149-041-01 149-041-02 CHURCH STARR LIT FITNES WILLIAM A WALL - �ia�fstt '. kYtl�R6i�CFT 21591 KANEOHE LN 9002 NIGUEL CIR 9022 NIGUEL CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-03 149-041-04 149-041-05 JOHN W OSCHMAN DAVID D CHAPMAN 9032 NIGUEL CIR 9042 NIGUEL CIR 9062 NIGUEL CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 ` HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-06 149-041-07 149-041-08 RAYMOND H ZAJAC JOHN S KAUFMANN MICHAEL G GROSSMAN 9072 NIGUEL CIR 9082 NIGUEL CIR 9092 NIGUEL CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-09 149-041-10 149-041-11 THOMAS & ATHENA GUIJE DALE LYON WALTER M & KERRY ROTH g0411 APStAh rm. 25382 ELDERWOOD 9071 ADELIA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 LAKE FOREST CA 92630 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-12 149-041-13 149-041-14 DARWIN D ZIRBEL 1oAW1tVA" " PATRICK E BEACHNER 9061 ADELIA CIR 9041 ADELIA CIR 9031 ADELIA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-15 149-041-16 149-041-17 DONALD L CHURCHWARD DONALD SCHWEIGER LYDIA D KING 9021 ADELIA CIR 9001 ADELIA CIR 2266 HILLSIDE AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 NORCO CA 92860 149-041-18 149-041-19 149-041-20 ERIC L DABROWSKI JERRI I KUNS EDWARD L MOYNAGH 287 TEMPLE AVE 9032 ADELIA CIR 9042 ADELIA CIR LONG BEACH CA 90803 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 SV10 AVERYO Address Labels Laser k5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 149-041-21 149-041-22 149-041-23 CAROLYN CROCKETT LENORA J RAIA RICHARD J BASHORE 9062 ADELIA CIR 9072 ADELIA CIR 9082 ADELIA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-24 149-041-,25 149-041-26 BILLY E STEVENSON WILLIAM H LACEY CHRIS P OGAWA 9092 ADELIA CIR 9091 RHODESIA DR 9081 RHODESIA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-27 149-041-28 149-041-29 RALPH S SILVA ROBERT M & ._PAULA BROWN : "�I�4�1P►�R• 9071 RHODESIA DR 9061 RHODESIA DR 9041 RHODESIA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-30 149-041-31 149-041-32 DAVID A ARCHIBALD ODIE L POWELL TAD D & NANCY BUCHOZ 9031 RHODESIA DR 9021 RHODESIA DR 9001 RHODESIA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-33 149-041-34 149-041-35 SHIRLEE J EARLEY FRED I GRIMES JOHN T MONTOYA 9002 RHODESIA DR 202 21ST ST B 9032 RHODESIA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-36 149-041-37 149-041-38 440146 wun AI- pvf'P3 SCOTT A & GAIL SWANSON RICHARD W SMYSER 9042 RHODESIA DR 9062 RHODESIA DR 9072 RHODESIA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-39 149-041-40 149-041-41 NSL408 20tAS ON GORDON A WELLS MARK A MC DONNELL 9082 RHODESIA DR 9092 RHODESIA DR 9102 RHODESIA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-42 149-041-43 149-041-44 EVANGELINE T RENTAS BERNHARD B MOSKALENKO DONALD V & ANNA MAHER 9112 RHODESIA DR 4541 FIR AVE 9142 RHODESIA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 SEAL BEACH CA 90740 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-45 149-041-46 149-041-47 MELKON DEMIRJIAN DAVID T & JEANNE HUGHES MARILYN D ELLISON 9152 RHODESIA DR 9162 RHODESIA DR 9182 RHODESIA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-041-48 149-042-01 149-042-02 GORDON W NEAL RICHARD C & JOY CUBBIN ARLEETA A GREGORY 9192 RHODESIA DR 21622 POLYNESIAN LN 21632 POLYNESIAN IN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 MAVERY(R) Address Labels laser y7 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 149-042-03 149-042-04 149-042-05 THOMAS L NICHOLS THOMAS M SMITH CHESTER T BURWICK 21642 POLYNESIAN LN 21662 POLYNESIAN LN 21672 POLYNESIAN LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-042-06 149-042-07 149-042-08 MAIDA F CHEUNG MELVIN E WEBB ODILON C CARDENAS 14882 DAHLQUIST RD 21692 POLYNESIAN LN 21702 POLYNESIAN LN IRVINE CA 92604 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-042-09 149-042-10 149-042-11 LOUIS A CASSELLE JAMES J GILL RICHARD A YOUNG 7573 PARAMOUNT CT 21691 BAHAMA LN 21681 BAHAMA LN RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-042-12 149-042-13 149-042-14 THOMAS B HINKLE RODERICK J MCISAAC GEORGE E MASON 21671 BAHAMA LN 21661 BAHAMA LN 21641 BAHAMA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-042-15 149-042-16 149-043-01 STANLEY E BELITZ GEORGE M & JUDITH JOHNS SU-TSO & JUN-JUN CHEN 21631 BAHAMA LN 21621 BAHAMA LN 21891 VACATION LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 ' HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-043-02 149-043-03 149-043-04 SHAWN WERNER HARRY S GANN ADAIR W BENEDICT 21642 BAHAMA LN 21662 BAHAMA LN 21672 BAHAMA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-043-05 149-043-06 149-043-07 JAMES A GARRISON RICHARD J BRODERICK WILLIAM A STEWART 21682 BAHAMA LN 21692 BAHAMA LN 21702 BAHAMA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-043-08 149-043-09 149-043-10 FRANK W HILL MARGUERITE D WATSON ANITA L JOHNSON 21701 KANEOHE LN 21691 KANEOHE LN 9121 ATLANTA AVE 232 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-043-11 149-043-12 149-043-13 ROBERT & JAN MALCZYNSKI MICHAEL D CURTIS DONALD E WILLIAMS 21671 KANEOHE LN 21661 KANEOHE LN 21641 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-043-14 149-044-01 149-044-02 LAWRENCE K ROGERS JEFFREY A BECICA BARBARA COULTER 21631 KANEOHE LN 21632 KANEOHE LN 21642 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 MAVERYT) Address Labels Laser ?_�s 5960TM Smooth Feed Sheets TM Use template for 51600 149-044-03 149-044-04 149-044-05 MELVIN M BOWMAN PATRICK B MCKEE FRANCES A DAVIS 21662 KANEOHE LN 21672 KANEOHE LN 21682 KANEOHE: LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-044-06 149-044-07 149-044-08 GISELA RASOE PHILLIP W JONES HAROLD R LIEBMAN 21692 KANEOHE LN 21702 KANEOHE LN 21712 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 149-044-09 149-044-10 149-231-03 MADELINE J SEYMOUR LARRY L STEARNS SCHOOL HUNTINGTON BEACH 21722 KANEOHE LN 21732 KANEOHE LN 10251 YORKTOWN AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 *** 699 Printed *** I i 8AVERY(R) Address Labels Laser Z� 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use temptate for 51600 939-48-001 939-48-002 939-48-003 DONALD M PETERSEN ROBERT F BARON GARY L STUART 21541 SURVEYOR CIR 16611 CAROUSEL LN 10172 THESEUS, DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-48-004 939-48-005 939-48-006+00-1 THOMAS L WICKSTROM DOUGLAS R BARSH HARNEK S BRAR 21571 SURVEYOR CIR PO BOX Q 19502 WOODLANDS LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 939-48-008 939-48-009 939-48-010 RAYMOND P BOUCHER EMIL P MIORELLI NING YEH 21611 SURVEYOR CIR 9871 HOT SPRINGS. DR 21522 SURVEYOR CI4 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH -92646 939-48-011 939-48-012 939-48-013 GERHARD M SCHNUERER GENE T KRAUS DOUGLAS A HILL 6406 W OCEANFRONT FRNT 6502 W OCEANFRONT 21181 HILLSDALE LN NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-48-014 939-48-015 939-48-016 DICKY K YEE POWER .GROUP ASSOCIATES . 21572 SURVEYOR CIR PO BOX 5757 19881 BUSHARD ST HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92615 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-48-017 939-48-018 939-48-019 LEITH T TECKLENBURG ROBERT C WENDT CARL W & PEGGY GRODACH PO BOX 100 21612 SURVEYOR CIR 117 VIA DIJON SUNSET BEACH CA 90742 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 939-48-025 939-48-026 939-48-027 PENNY L BROWN KRISTEN A POWELL MOHAMMED SANTINA 8304 ATLANTA AVE 101 8304 ATLANTA 102 8304 ATLANTA 103 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-48-028 939-48-029 939-48-030 do^%y f1ftr.*4;L VMNDettws, :500 T DANIEL L CEBALLOS 174:1 MS • t4 V N -I -ST. —004 All KNTA *IDS 8304 ATLANTA AVE 201 %u N'tk% VM► V f, Celt 10096- WDN ftftj1j CA 9*0 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92 64 6 939-48-031 939-48-032 939-48-033 PORNDHEP KALAMBAHETI ; ST&IMS 1+MASSE14 P E1.A ENTES 8304 ATLANTA AVE 205 8306 ATLANTA AVE 101 8306 ATLANTA AVE 102 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-48-034 939-48-035 939-48-036 ROSS C THOMPSON NAN H PALK "TtRSNGE lvmk 8306 ATLANTA AVE 103 8306 ATLANTA AVE 104 8306 ATLANTA AVE 105 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 O .2 AVERYO Address Labels Laser 0 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 939-48-037 939-48-038 939-48-039 STEVEN R HUBBELL HEIDI L DAHLIN VICKI A NEWMAN 408 11TH ST 8306 ATLANTA AVE 205 8308 ATLANTA AVE 101 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-48-040 939-48-041 939-48-042 MICHAEL LEWIS KARRIE SYPULT - STEPHEN F KISKAMP 8308 ATLANTA AVE 102 8308 ATLANTA AVE 103 8308 ATLANTA AVE 104 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646- HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-48-043 939-48-044 939-48-045 BARBARA C VANCE RONALD A KORONA -1 K,, 830.8 ATLANTA AVE 105 MONZA MI Jj_31�4`:''` �►R 1w r HUNT I NGTON BEACH 92646 I TALY 20052 t_�,p� f mil`F, �ES� C,A- G�"G' 939-48-046 939-48-047 939-48-048 JON DECKARD JAMES D & GAYLE RASPE RONALD VON FREYMANN 8310 ATLANTA AVE 101 8310 ATLANTA AVE 102 8310 ATLANTA 103 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-'4�-049 939-48-050 939-48-051 �sA E KEITH M GIBERSON JOSEPH L JIMENEZ 8810 ALTANTA AVE 104 17 HALFMOON 8310 ATLANTA AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 IRVINE CA 92614 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-48-052 939-48-053 939-48-054 JOHN A MCCARTHY ELIZABETH A SHELTON RONALD VON FREYMANN AN2 1-PkPAA DP•. , - 8312 ATLANTA AVE 101 7540 58TH AVE NE HUNTINGTON BEACH $2646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 OLYMPIA WA 98516 939-48-055 939-48-056 939-48-057 GEORGE G SOULE GLENN A DIRADO JAMES C & SHARON GRIM 8312 ATLANTA AVE 103 8312 ATLANTA AVE 104 8312 ATLANTA AVE 105 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-48-058 939-48-059 939-48-060 SHAWN F DUPLASSIS RICHARD B GREENBLATT DAVID C SMITH 8312 ATLANTA AVE 201 8312 ATLANTA AVE 205 8314 ATLANTA AVE 101 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 H�3NTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-48-061 939-48-062 939-48-063 RICHARD E CAPRARIO DONALD D WELLS JOHN L VARGA 8314 ATLANTA AVE 102 8314 ATLANTA AVE 103 8314 ATLANTA AVE 104 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 939-48-064 939-48-065 939-48-066 MARK S TYDELL VINCENT A NOVACK STEVEN J GARCIA 8314 ATLANTA AVE 105 8314 ATLANTA AVE 201 8314 ATLANTA AVE 205 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 MAVERYO Address Labels Laser 1 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CON STATE OF CALIF DEPT OF OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21622 COAST HWY 21621 MAGNOLIA AVE 21643 PACIFIC COAST HWY HUNTINGTON BEACH 92651 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92651 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 STATE OF CALIF DEPT OF MILLS LAND & WATER CO HARRY D HOWELL OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21752 PACIFIC COAST HWY 21851 NEWLAND ST 22021 SUSAN LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 RETA C CAGLE KATHLEEN A MOONEY MARGARET E LOURTIE OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 22041 SUSAN LN - 22022 HULA CIR 22001 HULA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 DAVID S WAGESTER ALIREZA D VAZIRI MARION S GOLFOS OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9012 CHRISTINE DR 9102 CHRISTINE DR 9112 CHRISTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 JACK R & LAURA BYRD ROBERT H MERRITT THOMAS W MORTIMER OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 22072 SUSAN LN „22101 SURFRIDER LN 22051 SURFRIDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 STEPHEN TODD RUTH E DONOVAN NOSRATOLA D VAZIRI OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9201 CHRISTINE DR 22132 ISLANDER LN 22092 ISLANDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 POUL C ANDERSEN JAMES K BERNSEN G G WOODS OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9122 PLAYA DR 22112 SURFRIDER LN 22102 SURFRIDER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 POUL C ANDERSEN LUCILLE A BAGNOLI SCHOOL HUNTINGTON BEACH OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 22042 SURFRIDER LN 9212 CHRISTINE DR 8750 DORSETT DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 DENNIS K AUSTIN WILLIAM K GAMBLE RAMON E BOYD OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21352 BRETON LN 8722 HATTERAS DR 8662 SABLE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 KENNETH MCKAY LAWRENCE N OLSON DAVID G & SANDRA SUTTON OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 8632 SABLE DR 8631 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 21342 YARMOUTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 MAVEiRYO Address Labels laser 7? 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 WESLEY L SMITH PING H OEY SEABURY DEVELOPMENT CO OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21362 YARMOUTH LN 21372 YARMOUTH LN 21301 BRETON LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 - HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 STEVEN WAKIMOTO TERESA J LEE RALPH J CARNEVALE OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21341 YARMOUTH LN 8572 SANDY HOOK DR 21321 ANTIGUA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 LA V SPENCE OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21281 ANTIGUA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 *** 37 Printed *** GAVERYO Address Labels Laser �3 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 ROBERT BROWNING VIVIAN M BLACKMORE DANIEL M BRAUN OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21292 ANTIGUA LN 8521 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 8601 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 YOSHI & NORMA ADACHI DAVID P CHANG LOUISE W LO OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 8591 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 8581 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 8571 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 NEDAL A ABDELMUTI ERIKA NOLLAU LLOYD G AANENSEN OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 8541 SAINT AUGUSTINE DR 21292 SEAFORTH LN 21291 SEAFORTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 STACY M NIXON MICHAEL W SELNA RONALD R WILSON OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21401 SEAFORTH LN 8522 MILNE DR 21332 SAND DOLLAR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 JOSEPH FROLICH BERNARD B KAPLAN TARNUTZER OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21282 SAND DOLLAR LN 21502 NEWLAND ST 8570 HAMILTON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 � HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAC PAUL B SANDGREN PAUL B SANDGREN OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 8641 EDISON AVE 8551 EDISON AVE 8551 EDISON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 ARTHUR K BRIMLOW NABIL & SUZAN NASRE WESLEY H GRAY OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 8541 EDISON AVE 8521 EDISON AVE 9061 BERMUDA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 ROBERT J PENGILLY MICHAEL J MONAGHAN NEAL J RIEFFANAUGH OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9191 BERMUDA DR 9122 BERMUDA DR 9061 KAHULUI DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 AJIT S GILL LISA ANGELICI PAUL H STRAIN OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9131 MAHALO DR 9072 MAHALO DR 9112 MAHALO DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 WILHELM E KEIMEL MARIANNE THOMAS GARY R NICCOLE OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9122 MAHALO DR 9172 MAHALO DR 9171 KAPAA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 MAVERYD Address Labels Laser 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 GARY G CHOUGH ISOLDE L WITTMAN YUNG H PAN OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9161 KAPAA DR 21861 KIOWA LN 9082 KAPAA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 BORIS M ACKERMAN DENNIS L PARKER FORREST K HARRELL OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21852 KANEOHE LN 9172 ALOHA DR 9091 BOBBIE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 CHRISTINA J PIERCE HENRY S WHEATLEY JAMES R GALLAGHER OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9042 BOBBIE CIR 9082 BOBBIE CIR 21572 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 JAMES D PLUNKETT ANTHONY L NEMELKA SU-TSO & JUN-JUN CHEN OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21612 KANEOHE LN 21582 POLYNESIAN LN 21592 POLYNESIAN LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 *** 42 Printed *** r MAVERY(g) Address Labels Laser 5960TM Smooth Feed Sheets TM Use template for 51600 MARK HAKIM-DAVAR JAMES L MCNERNEY THOMAS & ATHENA GUIDE OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9161 HAITI DR 21601 KANEOHE LN 9091 ADELIA 'CIR. HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 DALE LYON LYDIA D KING ERIC L DABROWSKI OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9081 ADELIA CIR 9002 ADELIA CIR 9022 ADELIA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 FRED I GRIMES BERNHARD B MOSKALENKO MAIDA F CHEUNG OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 9022 RHODESIA DR 9132 RHODESIA DR 21682 POLYNESIAN LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 LOUIS A CASSELLE SU-TSO & JUN-JUN CHEN ANITA L JOHNSON OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21701 BAHAMA LN 21632 BAHAMA LN 21681 KANEOHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 ROBERT F BARON GARY L STUART DOUGLAS R BARSH OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21531 SURVEYOR CIR 21521 SURVEYOR CIR 21561 SURVEYOR CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HARNEK S BRAR HARNEK S BRAR EMIL P MIORELLI OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21591 SURVEYOR CIR 21581 SURVEYOR CIR 21601 SURVEYOR CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 GERHARD M SCHNUERER GENE T KRAUS DOUGLAS A HILL OR CURRENT RESIDENT_ OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21532 SURVEYOR CIR 21542 SURVEYOR CIR 21562 SURVEYOR CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 DICKY K YEE POWER GROUP ASSOCIATES LEITH T TECKLENBURG OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21582 SURVEYOR CIR 21592 SURVEYOR CIR 21602 SURVEYOR CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 CARL W & PEGGY GRODACH STEVEN R HUBBELL RONALD A KORONA OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 21622 SURVEYOR CIR 8306 ATLANTA AVE 201 8308 ATLANTA AVE 201 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 KEITH M GIBERSON RONALD VON FREYMANN OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 8310 ATLANTA AVE 8312 ATLANTA AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 n� AVERY@ Address Labels Laser ��2 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit #1 A 21851 Newland St., Unit #1 B Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#1 21851 Newland St., Unit#2 21851 Newland St., Unit#3 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#4 21851 Newland St., Unit#5 21851 Newland St., Unit#6 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#7 21851 Newland St., Unit#8 21851 Newland St., Unit#9 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#10 . 21851 Newland St., Unit#11 21851 Newland St., Unit 412 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 1untington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St.,Unit#13 21851 Newland St., Unit#14 21851 Newland St., Unit#15 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#16 21851 Newland St., Unit 417 21851 Newland St., Unit#18 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 : 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St.,Unit#19 21851 Newland St., Unit#20 21851 Newland St., Unit#21 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the.Sea 21851 Newland St.,Unit#22 21851 Newland St., Unit#23 21851 Newland St.,Unit#24 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#25 21851 Newland St., Unit#26 21851 Newland St., Unit#27 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 /� AVERV® Address Labels Laser '7 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit #28 21851 Newland St., Unit#29 21851 Newland St., Unit#30 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA'92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#31 21851 Newland St., Unit#32 21851 Newland St., Unit#33 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit 434 21851 Newland St.,Unit#35 21851 Newland St.,Unit#36 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#37 21851 Newland St., Unit#38 21851 Newland St., Unit#39 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St.,Unit#40 21851 Newland St., Unit#41 21851 Newland St.,Unit#42 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#43 21851 Newland St., Unit#44 21851 Newland St., Unit#45 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#46 21851 Newland St.,Unit#47 21851 Newland St., Unit#48 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#49 21851 Newland St., Unit#50 21851 Newland St., Unit#51 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St.,Unit#52 21851 Newland St., Unit#53 21851 Newland St., Unit#54 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#55 21851 Newland St., Unit#56 21851 Newland St., Unit#57 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 CAVERY(g) Address Labels Laser �8 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#58 21851 Newland St., Unit#59 21851 Newland St., Unit 460 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA" 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit 461 21851 Newland St., Unit 462 21851 Newland St., Unit 463 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 _ 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#64 21851 Newland St., Unit#65 21851 Newland St., Unit#66 'Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#67 21851 Newland St., Unit 468 21851 Newland St., Unit 469 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit 470 21851 Newland St., Unit#71 21851 Newland St., Unit#72 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 `Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#73 21851 Newland St., Unit#74 21851 Newland St., Unit 475 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#76 21851 Newland St., Unit#77 21851 Newland St., Unit#78 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#79 21851 Newland St., Unit#80 21851 Newland St., Unit 481 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#82 21851 Newland St., Unit 483 21851 Newland St., Unit#84 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#85 21851 Newland St., Unit#86 21851 Newland St., Unit#87 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 SAVERY(R) Address Labels Laser 3 15960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#88 21851 Newland St., Unit#89 21851 Newland St.,Unit#90 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA: 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit 491 21851 Newland St.,Unit#92 21851 Newland St., Unit#93 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit 494 21851 Newland St., Unit#95 21851 Newland St.,Unit#96 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#97 21851 Newland St., Unit#98 21851 Newland St., Unit#99 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#100 21851 Newland St., Unit#101 21851 Newland St., Unit#102 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 'Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit #103 21851 Newland St., Unit#104 21851 Newland St., Unit#105 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#106 21851 Newland St., Unit#107 21851 Newland St., Unit#108 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#109 21851 Newland St., Unit#110 21851 Newland St., Unit#111 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#112 21851 Newland St., Unit#113 21851 Newland St., Unit#114 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#115 21851 Newland St., Unit#116 21851 Newland St., Unit#117 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 OAVERYO Address Labels Laser to 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#118 21851 Newland St., Unit 4119 21851 Newland St., Unit#120 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#121 21851 Newland St., Unit#122 21851 Newland St., Unit#123 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 - 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#124 21851 Newland St., Unit#125 21851 Newland St.,Unit#126 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#127 21851 Newland St., Unit#128 21851 Newland St., Unit#129 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#130 21851 Newland St., Unit#131 21851 Newland St.,Unit#132 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 `Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#133 21851 Newland St., Unit#134 21851 Newland St., Unit#135 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#136 21851 Newland St., Unit#137 21851 Newland St., Unit#138 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#139 21851 Newland St., Unit 9140 21851 Newland St., Unit#141 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#142 21851 Newland St., Unit#143 21851 Newland St., Unit#144 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#145 21851 Newland St., Unit#146 21851 Newland St., Unit#147 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 MAVERYT) Address Labels Laser '4( 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit 4148 21851 Newland St., Unit 4149 21851 Newland St., Unit 4150 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#151 21851 Newland St., Unit#152 21851 Newland St., Unit#153 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 _ 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#154 21851 Newland St., Unit#155 21851 Newland St., Unit#156 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#157 21851 Newland St.,Unit#158 21851 Newland St., Unit#159 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 1 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#160 21851 Newland St., Unit#161 21851 Newland St., Unit#162 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 'Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#163 21851 Newland St.,Unit#164 21851 Newland St.,Unit#165 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#166 21851 Newland St., Unit#167 21851 Newland St., Unit#168 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#169 21851 Newland St., Unit#170 21851 Newland St., Unit#171 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#172 21851 Newland St., Unit 4173 21851 Newland St., Unit#174 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#175 21851 Newland St., Unit 4176 21851 Newland St., Unit#177 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 MAVERY@) Address Labels Laser 4 Z 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St.,Unit#178 21851 Newland St., Unit#179 21851 Newland St., Unit#180 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#181 21851 Newland St., Unit#182 21851 Newland St., Unit 4183 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 - 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St.,Unit#184 21851 Newland St., Unit#185 21851 Newland St., Unit#186 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#187 21851 Newland St., Unit#188 21851 Newland St., Unit#189 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St.,Unit#190 21851 Newland St., Unit#191 21851 Newland St., Unit#192 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St.,Unit#193 21851 Newland St., Unit#194 21851 Newland St., Unit#195 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#196 21851 Newland St., Unit#197 21851 Newland St., Unit#198 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#199 21851 Newland St., Unit#200 21851 Newland St., Unit#201 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#202 21851 Newland St., Unit 4203 21851 Newland St., Unit 4204 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#205 21851 Newland St., Unit#206 21851 Newland St., Unit#207 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 OAVERY(g) Address Labels Laser A 3 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#208 21851 Newland St., Unit#209 21851 Newland St., Unit#210 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#211 21851 Newland St., Unit#212 21851 Newland St.,Unit#213 Huntington Beach, CA 9.2646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 _ 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#214 21851 Newland St., Unit#215 21851 Newland St., Unit#216 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#217 21851 Newland St., Unit#218 21851 Newland St., Unit#219 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#220 21851 Newland St., Unit#221 21851 Newland St.,Unit#222 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 'Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#223 21851 Newland St., Unit 4224 21851 Newland St., Unit#225 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit 4226 21851 Newland St.,Unit#227 21851 Newland St., Unit#228 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#229 21851 Newland St., Unit#230 21851 Newland St., Unit#231 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#232 21851 Newland St., Unit#233 21851 Newland St., Unit#234 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#235 21851 Newland St., Unit#236 21851 Newland St., Unit#237 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 OAVERYO Address Labels Laser 44 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#238 21851 Newland St.,Unit#239 21851 Newland St.,Unit#240 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#241 21851 Newland St.,Unit#242 21851 Newland St.,Unit#243 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-1.50-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#244 21851 Newland St., Unit#245 21851 Newland St.,Unit#246 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#247 21851 Newland St., Unit#248 21851 Newland St., Unit#249 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#250 21851 Newland St., Unit#251 21851 Newland St., Unit#252 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 j Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#253 21851 Newland St.,Unit#254 21851 Newland St.,Unit#255 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St.,Unit#256 21851 Newland St., Unit#257 21851 Newland St., Unit#258 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#259 21851 Newland St., Unit#260 21851 Newland St., Unit#261 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington.by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#262 21851 Newland St., Unit#263 21851 Newland St., Unit#264 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#265 21851 Newland St., Unit 4266 21851 Newland St., Unit#267 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 MAVERYO Address Labets Laser 45 5960'" Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#268 21851 Newland St., Unit#269 21851 Newland St., Unit#270 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#271 21851 Newland St., Unit#272 21851 Newland St., Unit#273 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#274 21851 Newland St., Unit#275 21851 Newland St., Unit#276 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St.,Unit#277 21851 Newland St., Unit#278 21851 Newland St.,Unit#279 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#280 21851 Newland St., Unit#281 21851 Newland St., Unit#282 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit 4283 21851 Newland St., Unit#284 21851 Newland St.,Unit#285 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#286 21851 Newland St., Unit#287 21851 Newland St., Unit 4288 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit 4289 21851 Newland St., Unit#290 21851 Newland St., Unit#291 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#292 21851 Newland St., Unit#293 21851 Newland St., Unit#294 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#295 21851 Newland St., Unit#296 21851 Newland St., Unit#297 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 OAVIERYO Address Labels Laser `F(0 5960Tm Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#298 21851 Newland St.,Unit#299 21851 Newland St.,Unit#300 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit 4301 21851 Newland St., Unit#302 21851 Newland St.,Unit#303 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 - 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#304 21851 Newland St., Unit#305 21851 Newland St., Unit#306 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#307 21851 Newland St., Unit#308 21851 Newland St.,Unit#309 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#310 ;21851 Newland St., Unit#311 21851 Newland St., Unit#312 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 114-150-72 114-150-72 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea 21851 Newland St., Unit#313 21851 Newland St., Unit#314 21851 Newland St., Unit #315 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 GAVERY(R) Address Labels Laser 41 5960TM LJ .rAct MEETING DATE: February 20, 2001 DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: REQUESTING: Planning Appeal of CUP 00-49/CDP 00-15/ND 00-09 (AES Guerating Station) Planning- continued from Appeal of CDP 00-22/EPA 00-12 (Surfer's Hall of Fame) 1/16/01 �t 3 TODAY'S DATE February 1, 2001 VERIFIED BY ADMININSTRATION: APPROVED BY: 2/1/01 2:28 PM NOTICE OF APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION OF December 12, 2000 Date of Planning Commission Action TO: Planning Dept (2 copies) DATE: December 19, 2000 City Attomey (1 copy) FILED BY Ralph Bauer, Council Member REGARDING: Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Reduction Equipment in Two Boilers at the Huntington Beach Power Generator Station (AES) - CUP No. 00-49/Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15/Negative Declaration No. 00-09 (21730 Newland St) Tentative Date for Public Hearing: To Be Determined Copy of Appeal Letter attached. LEGAL NOTICE AND A.P.MAILING LIST MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE Connie Brockway City Clerk x5227 h CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION To: Connie Brockway, City Clerk "= From: Ralph Bauer, Council Member Date: December 19, 2000 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPR01/ING THE NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS REDUCTION EQUIPMENT IN TWO BOILERS AT THE HUNTINGTON BEACH POWER GENERATOR STATION (AES) — Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49/Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15/Negative Declaration No. 00-09 (21730 Newland Street) wish to appeal the Planning Commission's action approving the Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Reduction equipment in two boilers at the Huntington Beach Power Generator Station (AES) — Conditional Use Permit No. 00-49/Coastal Development Permit No. 00-15/Negative Declaration No. 00-09 (21730 Newland Street) and associated entitlements because: 1. The City Council requires additional information regarding health risks associated with ammonia gas and liquid, including information pertaining to flammability, threshold valves, and time weighted averages with exposure limits. Additional information should be obtained regarding alternative pollution mitigation options. 2. The pollution reduction proposal needs to be reviewed for adequate design safety features, including education of staff, training, safety reviews of units, test readiness, etc. 3. Council has not been apprised regarding the hazards associated with an ammonia reactor failure including vapor cloud plume modeling. 4. It should be determined if development of a spill/leak procedural plan for neighborhood evacuation is required. 5. It should be determined if the current safety controls in place are adequate in the event of a major earthquake. 6. By virtue of this appeal, the Council must approve the Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Reduction System at the Huntington Beach Power Generator Station. RB/MPD/DSO cc: Mayor and City Council City Administrator I Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ` A rr �, AN I TA >L»`'J0 NS OIV OR CURRENT,,,RESIDENT INGTO 21681 KANEVHE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 — - 9ycF lot NTY Ca LEGAL NOTICE - P LIC HEARING {:d fill:{ss11sls:Iss:s1fs1ss{ Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ' P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,'ALLAGHER �atINGTp O . P`"RESID �10044yd 22 EOHE LN _ Fq HUNlt`I V ON BEACH 6 V y 9y Q LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING t t 926�.�i fist.3t1P �'rjrrrr�l�tltrtr�rr�l��ltjrrr��tr�rt�rlr�t�rl�trrlrr�r�r)'r�r� Connie Brockway, City Clerk r PETTO City of Huntington Beach `=NN Office of the City Clerk a NO Sur14 r!u. f Q DECEASE® P.O. Box 190 U ATTEt%dPT'J) (JOJ :,fvJO{,NN Ll VACANT Huntington Beach, CA 92648 0 IrI f I ' ': I+ - =1 REFUSED C' t'40 i 11r_1_IV;�FtAf31_L i"S ADDRESSED UNA3 _7 TO FORV:ARD ROUTE- NUM6ER,,._,-------MITIAtS 149-041-18 ERIC L DABROWSKI INGjp 287 TEMPLE AVE LONG BEACH CA 90803 _ DABR287 RETURN 1899 16 02112/01 TO O UNABLE TO FORWARD yc�. • nmrr ronr YI'f AF'ninER �ouNTY ca LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING ! rr jj (( !! ) jjrrss }y } r. .4. 1�tltfl{Itrt�(liFfitl�FtllFISIIt i jj fftt i} �j _� i FF !F 1.. SrMrj' {4ullv�Y �.:`.:•.:"Y'..:ii .. 111{lllll�i ffi{iS ! i4 {{I {li! ii! i Ill Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach S Office of the City Clerk (� P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �4--Y 114 1 � C C L1 -Huntington by the Sea 1NGTp�,� 21 5�,Nywl4fid St., Unit #34 � Huntington Beach, CA 92646 C.2 - s cpUNTY ca` LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING 132646 O&RAP llflfllfl,Ifllffflfflfl11 fill]l,Ilfffflfli+flfff1( 1ff1,flr,ll,1 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 / D� Huntington Beach, CA 92648 QZ,'� 114-150-72 K C UPANT-Huntington by the Sea VNTINGTp F � Newland St., Unit#17 IC MCI t gton Beach, CA 92646 w • 7 i,e,. c��puNrr LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING S2644. cvM Ilflf Off lf1,11,f:lf fit 11111ffflfllfI►I#JII111llffftff11111111 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 114-150-72 . ,rVNSINGTpy OCCUPANT-Huntington by the Sea �p� .• �Eo �F9 21851 Newland St,, Unit #174 . Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Q yCF c p cP`��c UIYTI LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING fflft;, 111111111 fill 1111111 fill 1111s111f Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 5 2 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Q 2-.2 Vc - 6 BERNARD B KAPIs ` " OR CURRENT RES I15 INGTp�,� 21502 NEWLAND ST •. HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 ��puNTr LEGAL NOTICE _ PUBLIC HEARING j j slzs0.s- WI Mf+ - - � Ilflti11l11s11t1111111111111111111111111111111111111 fit III1ill Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i'F Q� JI1`I1T-Huntington by the Sea C INGtpy F ' `1 No Unit#309 ' nd St., s Itji3��gta each, CA 92646 ca -- - s Q TY cp` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 3 $a5 c»vt�p 11111111111 fill lll{ll1l111,11r1i1(illli,lli,IlllfillififIIII if Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach ' Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 2 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 fr' 0 —vl , 4u -Ll FRS,.N INGTpy 0 T 0� ero,, 6 2204 SU F LN =Mcu �Eo F9 HUNTITO �B —_-_- y H 92646 F�puHTr ca`�� LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING �2�a� c�vt�p ((,1,Illil(tl(Illllllliill(Illll,i(II{,li,►�1„(tlill(�i(Illfi Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 4Zj� j6) MILLS L ' T �'CO E��aSINGTQy� OR CURRENt'.19 p4Z4T 218 51 NEWLANT7T; y HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 Z COUNTY ca` LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING jt JJ jj f jj JJ J { t Ill 3�LfY��3 1 �7 1111If Ill Ifillfffilf'fill IIlffl;ll Ill 1£;fll If(I fill 1!if if 1l 111 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 114-150-72 •; OCCUPANT-Hut Sea INGTQy 21851 Newland St., it `# Huntington Beach, CA 92646 ��_- 1•�w pQ COUNTY ca` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING "��L'F✓��✓ tr-1`�t�� I1{�3flili�iliif3Ei31ilf£t{i4{I;�ifttillt£311{t��;fll1£tfJ3£!1 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 114-150-72 �r D �yNTINGtpy OCCUPANT-Hum �� t�t ea tj ��,.,,�„ B 21851 Newland St., Y it ;7 f, F _ 9y Huntington Beach, CA LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLICS HEARING �r � l4,UM? 11i11tiili�l111131StI111!!13!l1i113l11lil1t1111l1ElIliti41t1i1 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 5 -J P.O. Box 190 v Huntington Beach, CA 92648 114-150-72 , VHTINGTp OCCUPANT-Nhntfr�n byl_l Sea ,►,..,f�f'9 21851 Newlandt ; Unit'##2(9 Huntington Beach,�CA `92646 52. OQ LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING SINW, 6 IpX3 %,p fit!III illllIli!Ili IIIII!!I!!!I III 11111111111111111111!111!!!!t Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk �� Z P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 tl 4Lw*C! 114-15 �NTINGTp OCCUPA�dy� Iut in� by the Sea 'll 21851 Newla it#l 00 Huntington Beach;CA 92646 s f•;,;,.,.•� �o cFpppNTV LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 3� a'�ifi�1MP II:IIl11IlIrIIltl#i1111I7lI!ldl3llt1l1ff7I71iI7tI1d411t371lItE ...' Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box.190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 a2-• o vD� xf :,,�0. CITY OF HUN' TNG' CN' EAC !/ INGTp�, OR CURRENT RE .IDENTU — 45 p�c `�wRro�,,f dF 8641 EDISON AV 9� HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 v , �pppNTY ca`\ LEGAL NOTICE -.PUBLIC HEARING �' ^G1f.`r�Fi j1f..��"�� �ll�!!!l�t�l��flf}tl�d��71/1}7!I'�l 17F Ft7ddf�1i�17�1111��Itlf� Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 - Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Tt a ti UpA%NT,;4Iuntington by the Sea St. Unit#65 21$�"1 eiw'and INGT°,y Huntington Beach, CA 92646 co �ouNty ca LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING 54 {{t{srsr{s{r{{ssr{rt{t{{rs�ere{s{Issas{t{sss{{s{{sss{s +r.. . r�Jri:�ta5' p141�4+ ___ Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach ,� � Office of the City Clerk 5 P.O. Box 190 Y�h Huntington Beach, CA 92648 2� 2D_D� 1 72 141,0 � . 9 �d1PANT-Huntington by the Sea 41,0 INGT� �` t8NNewland St., Unit #293 Q =Mwero��� Huntington Beach, CA 92646 cF�OUHtr �a`� LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING sve,*.& vYap Iirl,rer(rill!rrrlrrlr!l1rl,rrlrtlr fill fill IFll,lf,irlrrttrirl 1 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 S 7.1 114-150-72 ��,rr� OCCUPANT-Huntitari`1� M /S ea INGTO,y 21851 Newland St., Unit�#3 �`� Huntington Beach, CA 92646 E�t�iees.►p O NTY cP``� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING vze'4-s 0'm%'%p 1It1t�££it1£Iftttlt,I,llttill t1111tt11tit1„11111,iltltttitit1 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 7 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 JJ VN'TING TO OCCUPAN � by the Sea 21851 Newland`$S�,' it 9150 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 QZ 9y — p �� �»nee• �� c00NTY ca` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ii SrL.�C'M' t �3t1a Iltltt[tI£ £lit£il£tltl}ttit£tltllttttl11111 £££ttt fill till III Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 1901� Huntington Beach, CA 92648 k 114-15 '`0-72 OCCUPANT-HiinitILIT��o"1 the Sea �- ��VNTINGTpy� 21851 Newland St.;JL'Tni 1 ' ,•w"ro",.F, F9� Huntington Beach, CA 92646 � s -00 �cpUNTY cam` LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING i)) { sf J 3'�6416 E� AAP 1111I !EI£I III FFEI EFIFIIIII II£IilllElil!!!11£I111fFIlIiiFIEI1{ Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 o� 114 5,0,,7� INGTpy� OCCUPAN-1 ' luntington by the Sea �0 ,•w"'° 21851 Newland St., Unit 4294 , Huntington Beach, CA 92646 F�puHTY IL LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING s s a6 f, F1%'AA?v _ Milli it 11111111111111111 1111,11111111111111111111111 it 1111111 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 114 1507 . OCCUPANT-, untington by the Sea �VNSING" 21851 Newland St:, Unit #114 O� ,. ro•,rEo d� Huntington Beach, CA 92646 INC NTY a LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 �� h Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Z; TING _5 -72- -Huntington by the Sea a ��`y I'ewland St., Unit #212 s "� 1nii� ton Beach, CA 92646 y Ise QQ NTY ca`\ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ��.�.�.� �IvMt� li,f,,►,f�l,Il,,,!„I11{„I„i{,l{,,,1{li„!{„lli,ll{,I,11„{ Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk S P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648All •X:X 6 .�A C-A 'Ke 11 N1,A!-L Z�„ ✓`�' O emT�T iffntington by the Sea '� -- �VHSINGTp�, �1$S1` e md-St., Unit #55 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 ppUNTV ca` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ss4s00Is 0,vfAp 1111111,}11111111E11 fill I11( 111111111111 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk k N P.O. Box 190 J . Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r -Huntington by the Sea ` �VNSINGTpy 2"1851 ;hand St., Unit#54 Iut-tFngra/h Beach, CA 92646 i co =` i 9 eff. O y�FcpUNTY cP`\� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ba ��t 11l111„1fIf11„1111If III 1}r1f11111111„1111111111flrli„1Ji1 Connie Brockway, City Clerk r City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 114-150-72 OCCUPANT-Hunt1.4 BUNTING,* -' Ole Sea f, 21851 Newland St., Unit' 295 BF Huntington Beach, CA 92646 F�ouNTI LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 3���'��i {=►�I!'ti'' ilildiilfi3#IllEliSii�lil�iitil�Iti��}IflliilliliSi2�ii31tll� Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 h Huntington Beach, CA 92648 4¢htY1�"*+ ':F.'y. {i .N t~••`r'1 L..j,'� 11",�',,,,'r.)�'}l1.�1 114-150-72 OCCUPANT IIuiitingfbrl,, y t1ie Sea �uHTINGl0y 21851 Newland St., 3llt`gg08 Q� Mwero11,i�` __ j'a q�' Huntington Beach, CA 92646 C4 —= ? Ic =- Q NTr ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ` ~LDS ��Z�I� IIIIlIftl}lil }}3i}ddi1111111 Ill Ill]IIdI1111111ilillillilil Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 4�5 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ., ;''L :x:.^.'. j,.r'rl 7rY`1 �c�.t 1'..7L'�l„�C•��••1"�� 114-150-72 \` OCCUPANT-Iftngtot e Sea INGT 21851 Newland `1, ��NSQ,y and : a 70 trro„fo`BF9� Huntington Beach, CA 92646 ' ix ISO �FcUUNTY Ca�� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING !! { 1.1111111i dil £ii££it£Il 11111£I11[[1i1£iliti 111111 Ill s1£I£ill£ll Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �NSINGTQ STATE OFfit' S& 1 FOR CURRE E L�f 21752 PACIF'`f ,CsO "S'1" HWY HUNTINGTON BEACH�`zh92646 QZ It:its pUUNTY cam LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING ! !!jj t tt jj J y t - -` IZ60'+s' AL1MP - I.11f-itli�r�l'ill!'ll�tllt fit 11111111111111i 1i t11£1t11111 r ti'tl _ Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk �` '�` P.O. Box 190 .,E Huntington Beach, CA 92648 N C;'H 927 CQ-/qua/fA Tr �NTINGjp 114-150-53 .PO4'4' Fq STATE EPOF CALIF DEPT O 2 OF C., - s SACRAMENTO CA 95814 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING �,=ice I1,i,,,,ll,ll,,,L,,Il,rl,it, ,,,oil]�l„{l,,,lyl„11,,,,,1,11 I Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of-the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ING IP 149 �Mw.►o*„fo F9�, 286 y CORO NICC086 9a679300@ 1A49 OS 02/13/01 O --- - " FORWARD TIME E:XP RTN TO SEND � NICCOLE 'GAR'i' R. 1784 MORENO AVE 'yl►F z,�ee. CORONA CA 9267y-29226 NTY LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING S 09,69S 1r)115t4VVA? Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 � �us Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ``s'� G �VaTIN6jp�, 114-150-26,51, & 55 .ro.,,f 6� Dept of Public Works,State of Calif 1025 P St. r= s s Sacramento, CA 95814 Z �FCpUNTY cam` LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING • i%� 'x: 'r'� 11.1....I'ItIll III 1111111 1111 oil tt111!1t oil 1411#11111111111111 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 114-494-12 JAMES K BERNSEN kTIN6tpy� PO BOX 384 �O AP044 E° e LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720 CP IV i,Y 4 PM Up. _ AUNTY LEGAL 0 'I P BLIC HEARING � � I ( t"' ('rt`itti.•ttl' � w lI{t!lfFl?I{l�tF{tlillltt{{i£l11 7lltll!!11{��17lttl���tllllltltlt�lt�lt£tlE�ttl Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk _ P.O. Box 190 �f•.f U + Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r .o - DELIVERABZEAS S> i~C? ` UNABLE TO FORVVAR© 149-022-14 MARIANNE THOMAS I NGTpy 200 S LAMAR S T 1050 n !J���l-�0 l JACKSON MS 39201 lr I 00 �cppNT�l Cap LEGAL NOTICE: P 6L1 � RING �.Q fill it111111111tti1tiittltlit1111)111111 till 111111111111111111 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 TO 939-48-054 NDER RONALD VON FREYMANN �w INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS 7 5 4 0 5 8 TH AVE NE �INGT MOVED. LEFT NO ADDW= OLYMPIA WA 98516 py� NO SUCH NUMBER �0 NP044r 9 UNCLAIMED I®REFUSE A7TEMPTEO NOT KNOWN GU CTR.Et 13I�tT VAC v W, ':IFTABLE � 2" 'X rL6SEL NO ORDER -L fVEFAsLE AS ADDRESSED- Q TO FOWARDUNAB LE cpuNTY ca LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING i#i if lfill# 11 I'll ,. _ �Ij�1� �'i�t'��y-:•Y,w w:�T�. ,. ��::� #lltlllt 1 i lil tl it t ISilli i 45 ,l Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk rTTr P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 4" i v � � -14 INGT��, G L GUMBERT 51 E $ c4 �ouHTr cP` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING '30T4fl � i�•'+vM4�—��19r� Ilil!!!!�{(lllt!!!!!lililllint!!lllliliiil:i:illltll!!!!!Il1f Connie Brockway, City Clerk ' City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 114-160-70y-1-5-,77iD3i+84 �VHTINGTOy STATE OF CALIFORNIA %+ �f, Bi 2 5 01 PULLMAN ST SANTA ANA CA 927 0 5 _ i J 2• LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 32T�7S t1F 1 =Q } :1,• � (��: =.tl! 1!i !{ �!i!!i !!I!i ! ! i::� !:!I=.�s!I Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 .H s1l� 92-7 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CON OR CURRENT RESIDENT �HTINGTp 21621 MAGNOLIA AVE �O��I► ,w.ro.,,EydF,�� HUNTINGTON BEACH C4 V, u �OUHr� ca LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway, City Clerk �r City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 149-ORIE05 MARJORIE M BENDEES 9132 REGATTA DR ING?, HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 T.(-}Tj '= LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ... s o&k�6,f1ktmIt3Ira llt{ttttJtllll!!llt III III MIMI III IIIItllttll!{lt11ltttt1s11 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 x.x. L •i� t'W4A EQ7 If INGr 149-014-10 '('6 LARRY S POE 9142 KAHULUI DR - ` dF w� =M�oprop�rfv 9 — y HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 3�5 t ft "Cp�NTY �� "t : LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLaaI .I WEARING �C-q H+, -- •%���-'=""i'�'•• llililtsllltlllfflltllitlitillll 1!t!!{lfill�I!!!!!!�{�!{!11(!!!{llti{1}lF�lillt Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach r h k Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 149-031-28 CHRISTINA J PIERCE �pNTINGTpy 91.02 BELCARO DR 100441F0`dFA� HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 V — 7y P^.avmr:.•y.urr ..,F-,..-�crta an .efc,...:.... .. �#m. ^stva'aasu..�-r, i 9 _ UR ys -o Q R F 1 U R T P, - G'�. -C r 3„� r :- T it _' FF Q ! p 1 AUNTY �:,.: ,�,•: t• L GAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING 11,1,,,,1,1,11 till„11,11,11,1,,,,11111 till till,l„11,,,,,1111 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 STATE OF CALIF DEPT OF iNGTOy OR CURRENT RESIDENT ,•w"'°"+�F, �F 21643 PACIFIC COAST HWY co HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 f'R E�T�LUPTR c_ctin_r_n�,"' _-.� - ouNTY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING SZ64f. c4%_A'%p� : :`: _ . _ 11 1 f i 11 1 11 1 lli 1ai„Ii„IJLMIIiii,i„ii,,,iii:,ii,,,i,i„i Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach _ l'A is Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 ' s Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 . ♦ C 1 4 939-48-014 INGTOyor+� s1oW N apt ,•�"ro 21572 SURVEYOR CIR y HUNTINGTON BEACH 92646 _ T!r �'. _, Tn _ ct o�Nrr r LEGAL TICE",PUBLIC HEARING".- 1 1 I il„1,1 i 11!{i,Iti„-I I„I I I I I I I:.[,1{i,l.I.lif,I 11111111111{1if Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 `4 f 148-071-13 DENNIS K AUSTIN �uHSINGTOyt � Q� =y�o"ro"+rfc BF r^, 21554 NEWLAND ST HUNTINGTON BEACH`. 92646 RETURN " _-•�,y' Rfw �o( TO Jt �ouNrr ca LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HE RGNG ^ re SS64� s,��t� I(11,„ l,Itif,,,11,It(14,1„11►11„11,,,1„1,11,11,1„ltlll,l Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of t e Box 19 f �' t) 1 H tington Beach,CA 92648 / UhjINGTU KENNETH MCKAY �J'g :q-R CURRENT RESIDENT SABLE DR 1.1J-N 1 TTT/'�T/1TT �. !s MCK.A632 92646:3002 1N 16 02f 12f 01 4 �. RETURN To SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE' TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER rouNTr �a LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING ! tt ! ! '9SC�i4rfi: �U�t1P ���nr��rrur��u��rr��rrr�lrrr��rrrlirrnrr��i�ru��rn��rrrl Connie Brockway, City Clerk I' City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 - Huntington Beach, CA 92648 -x.g. 1 4 1-20 INGTpy C.3 TO co 0 yC ` � ��• .fie R -�._ 1TED EGAL NOTI E= PUBLIC HEARING } jj jj ((j j !! N0 K15�P�'� � f"St11Fr 1�i�th, Ilil13434ilillibili311lilifiil{{