The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPub Hear-Appeal PC approval of CUP 91-11-esta Church w/jo yao. y0 CHABAD OF NVEST ORANGE COUNTY 5702 Clark Drive,Suite 18 • Huntington Beach,California 92649 • p1,0 846-2285 BOARD OF Dn ECrORS January 6,1992 DIRECTOR-RABBI Attn: Connie Brockway Aron David Berkowitz City Clerk PRESIDENT Honorable Mayor and -City Council , Haim Katzir — - VICE PRESIDENTS ways6Meaxr Please be informed that for various reasons we are with- Carol Geller drawing our application for the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11. Membersbfp Florence Kaplan We will thus not be attending the hearing tonight. Facility Operatiom Larry Tichauer Sincerely, Contrraunity Relatiosu � /�_ Abraham Gill (y�'� Rabbi Aron Pavid Berkowitz SECRETARY/TREASURER Director - Rabbi Ken Goldblatt ADB/mb PAST PRESIDENTS BaryTabachnick,Esq. Reudor Gratch 'Togetber We Make It Happens" Building Campaign 1990 C 4BAD/LUBAVl CH- 7be largest network of religious and social services on the West Coast MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Eichblatt, City Engineer 1 FROM: Jim Otterson, Traffic Engin SUBJECT: Talbert Avenue between olden West Street and Gothard Street and its relationship to the Cross Gap Connector DATE: December 10, 1991 At the December 2, 1991, City Council meeting a number of questions regarding traffic conditions on Talbert Avenue were raised by Councilman Green (and others). I will attempt to answer these questions in the order in which they were raised. 1. Have traffic model runs been prepared for the No Cross Gap Connector scenario? Answer: Yes, the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Program Traffic Analysis (prepared for the Koll Company's Bolsa Chica Project E.I.R.) contains ten development scenarios, and seven of these scenarios have traffic model runs for the "No Cross Gap Connector" condition. Of the three remaining scenarios, two have been previously modeled without a Cross Gap Connector component. Talbert Avenue is not effected significantly by the construction or deletion of the Cross Gap Connector. All of the traffic modeling scenarios have shown traffic volumes between 5,300 and 5,900 vehicles per day on Talbert Avenue between Golden West Street and Gothard Street. 2. Can the Cross Gap Connector be connected at the intersection of Edwards Street/Ellis Avenue rather than at the proposed location (the western terminus of Garfield Avenue). Answer: It is my understanding that the Cross Gap connector route was selected to minimize grading operations. The present route would use a natural "gap" or low point in the bluff line. The Edwards/Ellis intersection route would add significant grading and fill along the bluff line. The cliffs are considered a significant natural and coastal resource and efforts have been made to minimize impacts on the bluff. It should be noted that previous attempts to reroute Ellis Avenue to connect with the western portion of Talbert Avenue have been defeated by four different City Councils. The Cross Gap Connector (at Edwards/Ellis) would generate additional traffic on Ellis Avenue (through an existing quiet residential area), which does not have convenient access to Beach Boulevard. Additionally, a Cross Gap Connector alignment at Edwards/Ellis would require substandard curve radii or construction of another right angle intersection (the southerly extension of Bolsa Chica Road intersecting with the westward extension of Ellis Avenue). - 1 3. Will any housing units constructed in Phase 1 of the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan preclude the connection of the Cross.Gap Connector at the Edwards/Ellis intersection? Answer: No, but the parcel immediately west of the Edwards/Ellis intersection is to be deeded by Pacific Coast Homes to Orange County for inclusion in the Linear Park. Connecting the Cross Gap Connector at the intersection of Edwards/Ellis will have a significant impact on the Linear Park. 4. What happens if the Cross Gap Connector isn't built? Answer: This question actually has a two part answer. The existing Development Agreement between Pacific Coast Homes and the City specifies that Pacific Coast Homes will be required to mitigate (city-wide) the traffic impacts of their development. This is stated on page 18, second paragraph, of the current Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement. Please see attached Figure 6 from the Bolsa Chica Traffic Analysis showing the system wide traffic impacts of No Project(that is , no Bolsa Chica development) and No Cross Gap Connector for a graphical presentation of likely street system level of service deficiencies with Holly-Seacliff,Meadowlark, Waterfront, and other development traffic. The development (or lack of development) ultimately approved for the Bolsa Chica will determine the traffic impacts on the City's street system. Assuming that the Koll Company's current proposal (approximately 4,800 dwelling units) is approved, it is likely that a number of street segments and intersections will be deficient (please see attached Figure 18 from the Bolsa Chica Traffic Analysis, which depicts 4,800 dwelling units in the Bolsa Chica with a Cross Gap Connector). If the Cross Gap Connector is not constructed emergency vehicle access times will be significantly effected. The Fire and Police Departments would be able to provide more specific information on this issue. If Talbert Avenue between is deleted Golden West Street and Gothard Street, through traffic currently traveling on Talbert Avenue will be diverted to Slater Avenue and Ellis Avenue. Existing traffic on Slater Avenue (between Golden West and Gothard) is approximately 15,000 vehicles per day (vpd). Existing traffic on Ellis Avenue (between Golden West and Gothard) is approximately 5,300 vpd. Future traffic volumes (post 2010, from a Bolsa Chica Development modeling scenario with 5,700 dwelling units, a"worse-case" scenario) with Talbert Avenue deleted from the Master Plan of Arterial Highways shows 15,900 vpd on Slater Avenue and 7,500 vpd on Ellis Avenue. These traffic volumes represent levels of service (LOS) B and A, respectively. The Cross Gap Connector serves primarily north-south directed traffic and will have no significant impact on Talbert Avenue between Golden West Street and Gothard Street. cc: Steve May, Principal Engineer, Development Section Bruce Gilmer, Associate Traffic Engineer Ron Hayden, Director, Library Services Department Bob Franklin, Holly-Seacliff Case Planner Laura Phillips, Bolsa Chica Case Planner i it = IY IY Ii SI•TT• FILM r J' - 4 y ' O VO` LEGEND AM PEAK HOUR ICU EXCEEDS 0.90 a ® PM PEAK HOUR ICU EXCEEDS 0.90 ® AM AND PM PEAK HOUR ICU'S EXCEED.0.9.0 ADT EXCEEDS LOS "C"CAPACITY FIGURE 6 ROADWAY SEGMENTS AND INTERSECTIONS PROJECTED TO OPERATE AT UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS BASMACIYAN-DARNELL, INC. NO PROJECT, f NO BOLSA CHICA ROAD EXTENSION I 11 �I p n i a i t + > � =I ED,CF• ff wit Y F " s x.+r• Cw fc•o• 9� �s nun, C,y �C 9 �~ 9� �O F+ [ll7 r^ r� w•.•n� ' v } t .y .t Yo •�C— y� r 1 0 c° .o..a LEGEND ® AM PEAK HOUR ICU EXCEEDS 0.90 PM PEAK HOUR ICU EXCEEDS 0.90 ® AM AND PM PEAK-HOUR ICU'S EXCEED 0.90 ,r ® INTERSECTION WORSENS AS A RESULT OF THIS ALTERNATIVE w ' w.tnn ADT EXCEEDS LOS "C" CAPACITY - ROADWAY SEGMENT WORSENS AS A RESULT OF THIS ALTERNATIVE FIGURE 18 B% ROADWAY SEGMENTS AND INTERSECTIONS PROJECTED TO OPERATE AT UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS BASMACIYAN-DARNELL, INC. ALTERNATIVE 15 41800 DU, FULL MPAH 44 1155d Labels I 159-141-01 47, 48 159-201--34 City of h tington Beach SRW Enterprises 2000 Ma n St eet C/O The Heaverton Co. Huntington Be ch, CA 92648 P. 0. Box 18388 Anaheim Hills, CA 92817 159-141-79, -45,82 159-291-01 ` Redevelopment Laszlo Kovacs City of Huntington Beach 4645 E. Pacific Coast Hwy. 2000 Main Street Long Beach, CA 90804 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 159-141-66 159-291-03 Leroy Collins Paul Weatherly C/O Weible, Serge S. 7622 Talbert Ave. 231 1/2 S. Gail Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Severely Hills, CA 90211 159-201-01 159-301-01 Gordon Powers Thomas Gallagher 7452 Talbert Ave. 4921 -Los Patos Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 159-201-38 159-302-01 "`.. Eugene Duchene Johann Assigal 3682 Aquarius Drive 16530 Daisy Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Fountain Valley, CA 92703 159-201-03 0�� 159-302-02 2 Farid Kahale Johann Assigal 8975 Swordfish Ave. C/O Hans Lamports Fountain Valley, CA 92708 172552 Talbert Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 159-201-04 165-181-01 James Lange Dorris L. Krutcik 17621 San Rogue Lane 4053. Larwin Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Cypress, CA 90630 159-201-05 165-181-18 James Lange Steven K. Johnson 17837 Beach Blvd. 1308 Sussex Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Newport Beach, CA 92660 a 159-201-06 165-181-20 Antoine Kahale Ruby Scott 7382 Talbert Ave. 7821 Talbert Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 � (�4 g i � �� j �� -�� r_ 165-181-21 165-401-03 Huntington Beach R. L. Call Congregation of Johovah 174 Carmelito Ave. 7851 Talbert Ave. Monterey, CA 93940 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 165-181-22, 23 165-401-04 Bruce Miller Public Storage Euro 7871 Talbert Ave. C/O Public Storage Mgmt, Inc Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dept Pt. CA-50703/Box 25025 -Glendale, CA 91201 165-181-34 165-401-21 Automobile Club -HBI Partners 3 of So. California 7491 Talber tAve. #200 2601 S. Fi•gueroa Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Los Angeles, CA 90054 165-181-35 165-401-22 Wendy Robertson Tom R. Stephen 2622 Circle Drive 7451 Talbert Ave. Newport Beach CA 92660 Huntington Beach, .CA 92647 165-251-57 Ocean Front Company 10480 Talbert Ave. Fountain valley, CA 92708 165-253-13, 14 Church of the Coastland 7641 Talbert Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 165-261-57 DSI Realty Income Fund C/O CH Bonner Corp. 18552 MacArthur Blvd. #495 Irvine, CA 92715 165-261-63 Donald Westerdale 3352 Count Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 165-261-70 Paul Mora 7521 Talbert Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach /_� e4 -!:�_= '1 u.s. SORT Office of the City Clerk DEC 10 3 i = ` ' ^•t �� ,' P.O.Box 190 ` Huntington Beach,CA 92648 �� G 3 t:;F i:i a a a 165-251-57 OCEAN FRONT COMPANY ANT INGT 1 LIGHTHOUSE LN Oyu FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708-5019 O\ , OVIPD 41 F�-.-._— ta+wl=. i i01 q2708102h 16g0 1.2/13'191 � y F[IRk�.lt�l`?CING TIME EXPIRED - :OCEAN FRONT CO Y _ PU eax lbb9 A Az H�lN'fIN TON BEACH CA 92b47-lbbg 9y� tf , 9'FO RETURN TO SENDER FOOUNTY CPS\ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Chevelle Classics, Inc. c/o Original Parts Group Inc. 17892 Gothard Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 111-071-42 City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, cA. 92648 111'-010-58;69 - - City of Huntington Beach 165-034-21 P.O. Box 190 Royston , Charles W. Jr. etal Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 6941 Rio Vista Dr. Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 165-034-22 Boyte, ' Bill Ray 9015 Daum Ct. Springfield, VA. 22153 16,5-39.2-65 Hetzler, James R. Tr. P.O. Box 91 Rancho Santa Fe. CA. 92067 111-010-78 ;79 . 165-392-64 Chevron USA Inc. Brown, DeWayne L. Property Tax Dept. 15481 Electronic Lane, Ste. E P.O. Box 7611 Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 San Francisco, CA. 94120 165-401-01 165-392-38 Coastal Commercial Investments Bourguignon, Kenneth J 17800 Gothard St. 17712 Gothard St. Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 165-011;07 , 08 165-401-24 City of Huntington Beach Leonard, Jeff P.O. Box 190 16651 Gemini Lane Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 165-034-23 165-401-28 - Benevento, Giacomo Leonard, Jeff 6962 Rio Vista Cir. 17832 Gothard Street P.O. Box 2076 Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 165-03-1-39 165-401-25' Crumley, Kenneth E. Sun-Ace International Inc. 17702 E1 Nopal Lane 17852 Gothard St. \� Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 PUBLIC NOTJCES' I PUBLIC NOTICES I PN,)3LIC.N0,TICES' I PUBLIC NOTICES I PUBLIC NOTICES I PUBLIC NOTICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT_ NO. 91-1 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-36 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the . Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the. date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. O PATE/TIME: Monday, December 2, 1991, 7:00 .PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1/Negative Declaration No. 91-36 APPLICANT: City of Huntington. Beach - Departments of Library Services and Public Works -LOCATION: _ Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets. REOUEST: To consider deletion of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets" as an arterial from the City' s Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-36 'assessing the environmental effects of said Circulation Element Amendment will also be considered by the City Council COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in •the City. Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit- evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Julie Osugi, Assistant Planner, at 536-5271. . If you challenge the City Council 's Action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at ' the public hearing described in this notice,. or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. r Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach C7 JYVV7 R2 Q MI It 9u RI , - g M I V Ra R' CF-R , R3 R2 WL— MI-CD — I sNq� l MR2 .avnilS. RI RI x RI RI CF-R !�, j�!N --r- TL. ¢ ",7� M. �M1 CD : RzR2 R 3RIJCF-R "' a I-CD ._.�. R1 4, RI T MI-CD Ipl-MI MI-A "'fOR2 (RI RI RI\ MI-CD WA / R4 RI M, l\ _ R4-SR, C R 1<;: W CF-R _MI-CD MI-A •----R4-SR R�::,,�.... o 1... ; - 1.:.•ICq:C:q::1:4�Ntt;..., :, RI CF-R i .b7 ............ ... .!.......__..........------... - 1�....______-. -•----_—._ (RA-0-CD) a RI MI-CD M I M+` RI a ull w RI CF-R I u,l. RI RI . . I CF-C M I u -- �.Ec a n.n+.,lrr..u..•n RI "` CF C �•ae _ .ua�1a C EA 9 -1, N ,91 --3 C HUNTIINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ferty and Lloyd presents this property of the Week Shet,is a full-time agent with 10 expand pis usiness beautiful home located at years experience in the real es- years as. a top pro 21312 Yarmouth Lane in Hun- tate business and has been ERA m a j o r a r e a re tington Beach. very close by. The beach is Rafferty and Lloyd's top agent organization. Almost This lovely home has four within walking distance from in 1989 and 1990. R a n n s p e a r h e bedrooms, two baths, a remod- the home. Call Reynolds today to view international reloca eled kitchen, formal living room This property is listed for this beautiful home or if you which took him to )a with fireplace, and large family $282,500. wish to discuss your other real Hong Kong, Korea an room. Reynolds is the area specialist estate needs. She can be There are schools and parks for this favorite Huntington reached at 963-5555, ext. 316. Husband-wife team tops $1 million , in October Dennis and Ruth Lawrence of ERA First Class emphasis on service. Realty in Huntington Beach did it again. For the Dennis and Ruth are both college graduates who eighth time during the year of 1991•they surpassed put their years of varied experience together to I $1,000,000 in sales in a single month. Dennis and produce results that go far beyond what might be Ruth's sales volume for the month of October was expected in today's slower market. Realizing that $2,084,000. no one Realtor can give the service of two, they In the most recent issue of ERA's own national were pioneers of the team concept in real estate. newsletter, Team ERA, it was disclosed that this ERA First Class Realty recent)y relocated to larger dynamic duo is number one for ERA in listings more professional offices due to its recent wlw closed for all of California, and number two in the expansion. Dennis and Ruth can be reached at state for sales closed for all ERA offices. their new office, ERA First Class Realty, 18682 This townhousf Dennis and Ruth attribute their success to many Beach Blvd., Suite 100, Huntington Beach. Their bedrooms and fig long hours of hard work and an unrelenting phone number's are 963-7900 or 963-3461. PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICE I PUBLIC NOTICES Fictitious ber 6,1991 menced to transact busi. ent Drive, Huntington Fictitious DENANE 8 ASSOCIATES, Business Name F512314 ness under the Fictitious Beach,Calif.92646 Business Name 16835 Algonquin #209, ' Statement Published Huntington Business Name(s) listed Andrew Kiff Galltmore, Statement Huntington Beach, Calif. The Following persons Beach Independent No- above on: November 5, 9641 Orient Drive, Hunting- The Following persons 92649 are doing business as: vember 21, 28, December 1988 ton Beach,Calif.92646 are doing business as: Phillip Lieberman, 16751 THE CLEANING MOOD, 5,12,1991 Carol Ann Thanos This business Is con- UP & RUNNING, 9871 Barefoot Circle, Huntington THE Sergio Clr. #2 D, This statement was filed ducted by:an Individual Moore Cir., Huntington Beach,Calif.92649 Huntington Beach, Calif. 113-902 with the County Clerk of The registrant(s) com- Beach,Calif.92646 This business. Is con- Huntington PUBLIC NOTICE Orange County on Novem• menced to transact busi- Thomas C. Sheperd, 9871 ducted by:an individual Teresa Lopez Gonzalez, ber 19,1991 ness under the Fictitious Moore Cir., Huntington The registrant(s) com- 17722 Sergio Cir. #204, Fictitious F513359 Business Name(s) listed Beach,Calif.92646 menced to transact busi- Huntington Beach, Calif. Business Name Published Huntington above on: October 24, This business Is con. ness under the Fictitious 92647 Statement Beach Independent No 1991 ducted by:an Individual Business Name(s) listed This business is con- Andrew Kiff Galltmore The registrant(s) com• above on: October 29, ducted by:an Individual The Following persons vember 21, 28, December This statement was filed menced to transact busi. 1991 Y are doing business as: 5,12,1991 with the County Clerk of ness under the Fictitious Phillip Lieberman The registrant(s) com• THE AMERICAN DREAM 113.906 Orange County on October Business Names listed This statement was filed menced to transact busi. REAL ESTATE, 8072 ness under the Fictitious Warner, Huntington Beach; 29,1991 above' on: November 13, with the County Clerk of Business Names) listed Calif.92647 9 PUBLIC NOTICE F511440 1991 Orange County on Novem- above on:N/A Carol Ann Thanos, 8582 Fictitious Published Huntington Thomas C.Shepard bar 5,1991 Teresa L.Gonzalez Bermuda Ave., Westmin• Business Name Beach Independent Octo• This statement was filed F512116 This statement was filed star,Calif.92683 Statement ber 31, November 7, 14, with the County Clerk of Published Huntington No- with the County Clerk of This. business Is on-1 The Following persons 21,1991 Orange County on Novem• Beach Independent No- Oran a Count on Novem- ducted b :an individual 9 p ber 19,1991 vember 7,14,21,28,1991 9 Y Y are doing business as: 105-815 F513369 The registrants) com- pKG SERVICES. 9641 Ori- 111-845 Published Huntington PUBLIC NOTICES I PUBLIC NOTICES I PUBLIC NOTICES i PUBLIC NOTICES Beach Independent No- PUBLIC NOTICE vember 21, 28, December Fictitious 5,12,1991 Business Name NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS 113-897 .Statement CC-730 PUBLIC NOTICE The Following persons are doing business as: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, will receive - Fictitious PJ'S OAK SHOP, 23562 sealed bids for the Installation of traffic signals, median modifications and replacement of Interconnect Business Name Commerce Ctr.Dr.,Laguna' conduit and cable at the Intersections of Beach Boulevard and Newman Avenue and Beach Boulevard Statement Hills,Calif.92653 and Terry Drive In the city of Huntington Beach, California In accordance with the plans and The Following persons Perry Jay Bynum, 1517 N. specifications and special provisions on file In the office of the Director of Public Works. Documents are doing business as: Newhope,Santa Ana,Calif.' will be available on November 18, 1991. A charge of$15.00, not refundable, will be required for each SAL BERNARDINE CO., 92703 This business Is con- ton,Calif.90680 set of specifications and accompanying drawings. 12392 Beach Blvd., Stan- ducted b :an individual D The registrant(s) com• IRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ESTIMATE Salvatore James Bernar- g dine, 8400 Edinger Ave. menced to transact busi- Apt. 0104, Huntington ness under the Fictitious' Work Item Quantity Beach,Calif.92647 Business Name(s) listed This business Is con- above on:N/A 1. Install Traffic Signal at Beach Boulevard and Newman Avenue Lump Sum ducted by:an individual Perry Bynum 2. Install Traffic Signal at Beach Boulevard and Ter Drive LumpSum The registrant(s) com- This statement was filed g Terry menced to transact bust- with the County Clerk of 3. Install Thermoplastic Pavement Marking 1,010 S.F. ness under the Fictitious Orange County on October Business Name(s) listed 29.1991 4. Construction median modifications Lump Sum above on:August 19,1991 F511437 5. Install interconnect conduit and cable Lump Sum Sal Bernardine Published Huntington This statement was filed Beach Independent Octo- with the County Clerk o1 ber 31, November„7,r.14, In accordance with the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code, the State of California, Director Orange County on Novem• 21,1991 of the Department of Industrial Relations shall determine the general prevailing rate of wages, ap- ber 19,1991 105-812 plicable to the work to be done; copies of the latest general wage rate determinations are on file at F513361 the office of the City Clerk and the office of the Director of Public Works of the City of Huntington Be- Published Huntington PUBLIC NOTICE ach, California. Beach Independent No- Fictitious Plans and specifications, together with proposal form, may be obtalned at the office of the Director of vember 21, 28, December 5,12,1991 Business Name Public Works, City Hall, Huntington Beach, California. Statement 113.908 The Following persons No bid will be received unless It is made on a blank form furnished by the Director of Public Works. PUBLIC NOTICE are doing business as: The special attention of prospective bidders is called to the proposal requirements, set forth In the sp- PARRISH ELECTRIC, ecifications,for full directions as to the bidding. Fictitious. 21050 Lochlea #56, Hun- Business Name tington Beach,Calif.92646 The above quantities are approximate only, being given as a basis for the comparison of bids,and the Statement John J. Parrish, 21050 City of Huntington Beach does not express or by Implications agree that the actual amount of work The Following persons Lochlea. #56, Huntington will correspond therewith but reserves the right to Increase or decrease the amount of any class or are doing business as: Beach,Calif.92646 TRAVIS ELECTRONICS IN. This business Is con• portion of the work, as may be deemed necessary or expedient by the Director of Public Works. D U S T R I E S, 20905 ducted by:an individual Brookhurst #205, Hunting- The registrant(s) com- All bids will be compared on the basis of the Director of Public Works estimate of the quantities of ton Beach,Calif.92646 menced to transact busi- work to be done. Patty Panico, 20912 Skim- ness under the Fictitious mer Ln.,Huntington Beach, Business Name(s) listed Substitution of securities for any monies withheld by the City to Insure performance shall be permitted Calif.92646 _ above on:July 1982 in accordance with provisions of the California Government Code,Section 4590. This business is con- John J.Parrish ducted by:an individual This statement was filed Each bid shall be made out on a form to be obtained at the office of the Director of Public Works, The registrant(s) com- with the County Clerk of Development Wing, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California; shall be sealed and filed with the menced to transact busi- Orange County on October City Clerk at the Civic Center, Second Floor Administration Building, 2000 Main Street, Huntington ness under the Fictitious 29,1991 Business Name(s)' listed F511447 Beach, California, on or before 2:00 P.M. of December 12, 1991, and shall be opened by a committee above on:N/A Published Huntington composed of the City Clerk, the City Attorney and Director of Public Works or their authorized Patty Panico Beach Independent Octo- representative and the results of said bidding will be reported to the City Council of said City of This statement was filed ber 31, November 7, 14, Huntington Beach at their regular meeting to be held on December 16, 1991, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. with the County Clerk of 21 1991 in the City Council Chambers In the Civic Center of said City of Huntington Beach, and shall be acted Orange County on Novem- 105-822 u on b said City Council at the regular meeting of November 18, 1991. ber 19,1991 p y ty g g F513362 Published Huntington IPUBLIC NOTICE The City of Huntington Beach, California reserves the right to reject any or all bids, and to accept the Beach Independent No- Flctltlous bid deemed for the best Interest of the City of Huntington Beach, California. vember 21, 28, December Buslness Name By order of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California this 18th of November, 1991. 5,12,1991 Statement 113.909 The Following persons ATTEST: PUBLIC NOTICE are doing Connie Brockway Flctltlous 1920 Red Hill Ave., Costa Cl Clerk Business Name Mesa,Calif. , Inc.,City JBR Group, Inc. Galifor- Clty of Huntington Beach Statement nia, 2920 Red Hill Ave., The Following persons Costa Mesa,Calif.92626 Published Huntington Beach Independent November 21,28, December 5, 1991 113-930 r.he business as: This business Is con- A6 e } STATE OF CAUFORNIA County of Orange . t r I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of CaGfomia, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: November 21 , 1991 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on November 21 , at Costa Mesa, CaGfomia Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING _ CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 91-1 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-36 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, December 2, 1991, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1/Negative Declaration No. 91-36 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach - Departments of Library Services and Public Works LOCATION: Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets . REOUEST: To consider deletion of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets as an arterial from the City' s Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways.. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-36 assessing the environmental effects of said Circulation Element Amendment will also be considered by the City Council COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Julie Osugi, Assistant Planner, at 536-5271. If you challenge the City Council ' s Action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach (1447d) p�o RI RI �l � �. �. U�U R2 RI a — Q°1 �.1. cALONA ofl � RI ' MI P,• RI � � � C F—R 2 M I 6 R3 R2 RI - EI .�:, R3 _ ' ALA 1�L(VL dl O ' J0000 + L L L U MI-CD I sMI a. R2 n — CF-R •�o f�,., ... b RI RI RI RI ;rrVr;r..,os, rnl+aal P0114:; RONALD mi M I l__-- R2 R2 \ RI RI CF_R ::rol:;l LUC=MTo �\r -� �-C� M IM I ----1'ilACl[ail!8J •'.LV,1291. P:Y3:} RI � RI �. _ - _ 5 RI TALBERT MI-CD (o)-MI MI-A sr -(1 IR2 Rf I RI RI RI �• "" MI-CD MI.A ' Ra=SR _ 41 R4-SR C F R �� Zi Jl R p� MI—CD MI R4 IRA-Lry ------- -SR , RI :I!P0DA,:1 a. CF-R :'::'i':a: I- IMq (RA-0-CD) —--- -- w i5T=�� RI �. MI—CD M I MIS oareRlo Da CF-R �' __.....- Fraz--....... RI RI ae•o-�o ---- 1- j a - FRIRICF—C y , F M D � _Ol1BECDflF C I( ALBEIRE:—)TA 1) A' HUNTINCTON BEACH HVNTINGTON 6EACH PLANNING DIVISION - 3 FILE GUIDE Please file this document in: Category: Label : P&,6, l Established file New file - see Other: 0846I REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION December 2 , 1991 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrat V Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Develop rite ON L Subject: CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 91-1/NEGATIVE ` DECLARATION NO. 91-36 Coh+ 9ki4 Consistent with Council Policy? Yes New Policy or Exception � o•323 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1, a joint request by the Department of Public Works and Library Services to delete Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets from the City of Huntington Beach Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways with the replacement of the segment with a parking area for the Central Library. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommendation: Motion to: Adopt Negative Delcaration No. 91-36 with Mitigation Measures and approve Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 by adopting City Council Resolution No. 6333 and forward to the County Board of Supervisors for approval . Planning Commission_ Action on November 5, 1991: ON A MOTION BY RICHARDSON AND A SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-36 WITH MITIGATION MEASURES BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Richa-rdson, Newman, Shomaker, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None J PIO 5185 ON A MOTION BY RICHARDSON AND SECOND BY NEWMAN, THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 91-1 BY ADOPTING :PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1452, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Richardson; Newman, Shomaker, Dettloff, Bourguignon NOES: Kirkland, Leipzig ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ON A MOTION BY RICHARDSON AND A SECOND BY NEWMAN, THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO APPROVE THE CENTRAL LIBRARY PARKING MASTER PLAN BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Richardson, Newman, Shomaker, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CIWMB concerns were primarily associated with the types of waste the project would generate and impacts to landfill capacity resulting from the subsequent disposal of these materials . Staff explained that waste materials will predominantly consist of asphalt concrete which is completely recyclable. The comments and staff ' s responses have been included in the Planning Commission staff report (see Attachment No. 4) . Prior to any action on Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 91-36 . ANALYSIS• Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 The proposed project will delete the segment .of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets as an arterial . Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 evaluates the Talbert Avenue deletion in terms of the effects on 1) circulation patterns and projected traffic volumes; 2) emergency vehicle response; 3) existing and further land uses in the area; 4) the City' s participation in the Orange County Arterial Highway Financing Program; and 5) adopted City goals and policies . The Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 document attached to this report contains a detailed analysis of the issues associated with the arterial deletion. The following is a summary of the conclusions of Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 . RCA - 12/2/91 -2- (1447d) The subject segment of Talbert is a lightly used arterial (receiving approximately 5,300 average trips per day) . Traffic counts conducted by the Traffic Division have indicated that a significant portion (approximately 33%) of these trips are related to Central Library and associated activities . The remaining 3 , 500 through trips when redistributed on surrounding arterials (primarily Slater, Ellis, Goldenwest and Gothard) over a 24 hour period are considered minor and can be adequately accommodated without experiencing any noticeable deterioration in service level. All arterials in the project vicinity are currently operating at a LOS of A or better and are anticipated to continue to do so with the deletion of Talbert . Furthermore, the subject segment of Talbert is never anticipated to serve arterial level traffic volumes due to the previous deletion of Talbert between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets which eliminated potential use of the street as a connector route between the residential area, located to the west of Edwards, and Beach Boulevard. Build out trip projections anticipate an increase of approximately 500 trips per day of which one third are library related trips . Surrounding arterials are projected to operate at LOS of C or better and will continue to do so with the deletion of Talbert. In summary, the proposed Circulation Element Amendment will allow for the deletion of an unnecessary arterial designation, as determined by both the City of Huntington Beach Traffic Division and the OCEMA; and will provide potential safety benefits to library patrons and park users by reducing the number and the speed of vehicles in- the library vicinity. The segment of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets will never realize secondary arterial levels of use and will continue to be a minor component of the City' s arterial highway circulation system. Furthermore, due to the low number of through trips conveyed by this segment its proposed deletion will not substantially disrupt current and future traffic flow and levels of service in the area. In addition the subject segment of Talbert is not a vital part of the Fire Department emergency response route system and can- be deleted without any noticeable effect on emergency response time in the vicinity. And finally, the deletion of Talbert is consistent with other elements of the General Plan and will specifically facilitate implementation of the goals and policies of the Circulation and Community Facilities Elements . RCA - 12/2/91 -3- (1447d) Environmental Status : On September 4, 1990, the Environmental Assessment Committee (EAC) , in its initial study of the project determined that the project would result in several potential short-term impacts . However, all impacts were associated with the parking lot development rather than with the deletion of Talbert Avenue as an arterial . The EAC determined that all potential adverse impacts could be mitigated to a level of insignificance and recommended processing of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. All recommended mitigation measures were incorporated into the project as conditions of approval for the Central Library Parking Master Plan. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community .Development advertised draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 91-36 for 30 days . Written communications were received from the Environmental Board and the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) . The Env-ironmental Board expressed concerns over the suitability of construction of a parking lot near the landfill with the potential hazards associated with methane in the area . In response to the Board' s concerns, staff has clarified that the City contracted with Kleinfelder, Inc. to prepare a Landfill Gas Mitigation Investigation and Geotechnical Study. These studies assess the methane and• _soi-1 conditions for the p.roj.ect. site and detail methane ventilation methods and structural specifications for safe parking lot development . The Board also requested clarification on the proposed parking lot expansion for the Central Library. FUNDING SOURCE: Not Applicable ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Motion to: Approve Negative Declaration No. 91-36 with mitigation and deny Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1.. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Findings for Approval of Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 2. City Council Resolution No. (25'? to adopt Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 3 . Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 4 . Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 5, 1991 MTU:MA:JO: jr RCA - 12/2/91 -4- (1447d) ATTACHMENT 1 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO, 91-1: I. Deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Gothard , Streets will not result in substantial future impacts to surrounding arterials and the ability of the Circulation System to serve the Central Library area, since projected buildout levels of service or surrounding arterials with the deletion will be at LOS C or better. 2. Deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, will not negatively impact the future provision of emergency vehicle response to the Central Library area, since several adequate alternative response routes are available which will not deteriorate the Fire Departments five (5) minute response time to the area. 3 . Deletion of Talbert, between Goldenwest and Gothard as an arterial is consistent with the other elements of the General Plan. 4 . Deletion of Talbert, between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, is consistent with Circulation Element policies for the development of a system of arterial streets and highways that ensures the safe and efficient movement of people and goods by improving safety for library patrons and park uses by downgrading the levels of traffic and traffic speeds in the library area. 5. Deletion of Talbert, between Goldenwest and Gothard Strees, is consistent with the Community Facilities Element policies for providing adequate community facilities by providing adequate parking facilities and providing a more cost effective use of the property. 6. Deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, will allow for removal of an unnecessary arterial designation since previous deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Edwards Streets, prevented the possibility of future arterial level use or the subject segment. RESOLUTION NO. 6333 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 91-1 TO THE GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California desires to update and refine the General Plan in -keeping with changing community needs and objectives; and A public hearing on adoption of Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 to the General Plan was held by the -Planning Commission on November 5, 1991, and approved for recommendation to the City Council; and Thereafter the City Council, after giving notice as prescribed by Government Code Section 65355, held at least one public hearing to consider Circulation Element No. 91-1; and At said hearing before the City Council all persons desiring to be heard on said amendment were heard, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach pursuant to provisions of Title 7_, Chapter 3, Article 6 of California Government Code commencing with Section 65350, that Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 is hereby adopted as follows : That Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest Street and Gothard Street, shown on Exhibit I attached hereto, be deleted as a secondary arterial from the City of Huntington Beach Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways . G 1 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 be forwarded to the Orange County Board of Supervisors for adoption as follows : That Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest Street and Gothard Street, shown on Exhibit I attached hereto, be deleted as a secondary arterial from the Orange County Master Plan -of Arterial Highways . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting held on the day of December, 1991. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney /2 Y 17/ l REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Administrator Director of Community _ _- - Development 2 Res. No. 6333 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ; ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of December 19 91 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Robitail le, Moulton-Patterson,. Win -h , ,. r n F xP„y NOES: Councilmembers: Silva, MacAllister ABSENT: Councilmembers: None City Clerk and ex-officlo Werk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California RI P2 RI -..,....- ig R I LC5Q Ir�I - , R2 e AA C.RO%A on I M I m I RTY RI ` R I M I C F-R J - R2 RI - F.I r.,.rinr,;;r:,�. ...�,il't .-�.,:, S R3 �.Z4 NEKM.N V MI-CD I MI o oR. R2 RI RI RI RI cuTR_ rA.Rr:i O RONALD M I M I R 2 I I eo olM 6 - R �R MIa r— s °" TxfVII - CD y> R2 R2 o- 9 RI RI . CF-R !Y I-CD i uaa;MG10 ;N :.:r:�llt:a., r:ae.7 M I M I p RI RI I � � - a uz¢ ro rra RI TALE RT M1-CD (Q) MI MI-A �QJR2 V .R AV ^: �g RI s E. RI RI R I \= M l-co Ml'A R4--SR- i \o a r on a �.RR r R4-SR x C Fig R Z - - ._ .-- -- R CF-R MI-C MI A D "�R4-SR RIP' � IRc-01 (RII (R,01 '� 1-1 / -- "41Ri:01 ',� D t R I \I !!B=A LDB_ s! CF-R -------------------------- r . (RA-0-CD iN S RI RI MI-CD M I MI ONTARIO DR CF-R I_..._.... RI RA-0-CD _ --To€----- FRIRI CF-C R MI p _ QUEBEC DRRI TM IB+C FA :J RICF-C ¢( - ALBERTA pR~o R . C A 9 1-1TA HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ATTACHMENT N0.�e3- CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT 91 - 1 Huntington Beach Planning Division TABLE OF CONTENTS Section page 1. 0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1. 1 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1. 2 Environmental Status . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 . 0 AREA OF CONCERN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2 . 1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2 .2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2 .2 . 1 Circulation Patterns and Projected Volumes 6 2 . 2 .2 Emergency Vehicle Response . . . . . . . . . 10 2 .2. 3 Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2 .2 .4 Arterial Highway Funding Program . . . . . . 13 2 .2 . 5 City Goals and Policies . . . . . . . . 14 3 . 0 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 1. 0 INTRODUCTION This document constitutes an amendment to the Circulation Element of the Huntington Beach General Plan and is the first amendment to this element for .1991. The Circulation Element was adopted as a mandated element of :the General Plan in December, 1976; this is the sixth amendment to the Circulation Element since its original adoption. The adopted Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways is presented in Figure 1-1. 1 . 1 Methodology This report addresses a proposal by the City of Huntington Beach Library Services Department to delete Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest Street and Gothard Street from the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways (Figure 1-1) to allow for implementation of the Central Library Parking Master Plan. The proposed deletion is analyzed in Section 2 .0 in terms of existing and proposed circulation patterns and traffic volumes, emergency vehicle responses, impact on existing and planned land uses and consistency with adopted City goals, and policies. In order to evaluate arterial classifications needed to serve the current and future traffic conditions, certain criteria and assumptions are made regarding roadway capacities . The relationship between arterial capacity and traffic volumes is typically expressed by means of Levels of Service. The concept of levels of service assumes that each type of arterial has an absolute limit to the amount of traffic that it can accommodate and that conditions rapidly deteriorate as traffic volumes approach that level . As traffic approaches capacity, congested conditions are experienced. -1- (1315D) AMENDMENTS WESTMINS7ER �\ A CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL PLANNINIONG COUNCIL °°` \�. STREETS AND HIGHWAYS DATE RESOLUTION DATE RESOLUTION NUMBER NUMBER IOH7-76 1-1. II-6-76 46B8 rA ,t,C• 3-6-79 I243 321- 4729 - PpA - ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL 6-2-63 1310 12-3-63 5324 3-IS-64 1322 6-4-64 s3es RESOLUTION N0.4368-DEC.12.1976 1-20-66 13" 6-7-69 6033 ,L LEGEND: 1-6-90 eo9e LSA AVE. FREEWAY STREET CAPACITY ARGOSY MAJOR 45,000 PRIMARY 30,000 McraooEN we. SECONDARY 20,000 INTER m ` NOTE ..� EDINGER AVE. SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY \., NOT NECESSARILY ULTIMATE RIGHT'OF WAY DASHED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE-NO �1 RIGHT OF WAY EXISTS gI H 1AVEL _ AVE WARNER g AT R AVE. _� I \qt Q T4lj TALBERT IF. T � � `\ ; -�/ ELLIS AVE. g4 111, 7�-_GARFIELD ?P _. -------- .. -_ AVE. r 1 V� IIIYORKTOWN I AVE ADAMS AVE. r i I INDIANAPq.' AV 9� I \ AT ANTA I AV - r �� HAMILTON C', a. CITY OF g Fq2 HUNTINGTON BEACHf, � 'BANNIN9 ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA e i 21-0 A M—L FIGURE 1e1 The levels of service concept has established classifications A through F for defining levels of service. The six levels of service classifications are defined as follows : Level of Service A: indicates no physical restriction on operating speeds . Level of Service B: indicates stable flow with few restrictions on operating speed. Level of Service C: indicates stable flow, higher volume, and more restrictions on speed and lane changing. Level of Service D: indicates approaching unstable flow and little freedom to maneuver. Level of Service E: indicates unstable flow, lower operating speeds than level of Service D, and some momentary stoppages . Level of Service F: indicates forced flow operation at low speeds where the highway acts as a storage .area and there are many stoppages. The City of Huntington Beach has deemed a Level of Service of C as an acceptable flow of traffic for link capacities (a link is the portion of the roadway between two arterial intersections) , and a LOS of D for intersections . The following table shows the roadway capacity values the City uses for circulation analysis of each type of facility. Roadway Capacity Values for Arterial Highways Levels of Service* Type of Arterial A B C D E F 6 lanes divided 36, 000 40,400 45, 000 49, 500 54, 000 - 4 lanes divided 24 , 000 27,000 30, 000 33, 000 36, 000 - 4 lanes (undivided) 16, 000 18, 000 20,.000 22, 000 24, 000 - 2 lanes (undivided) 5, 000 7, 500 10, 00 12, 500 15,000 - *Maximum average daily trips (ADT) , which is defined as the average number of trips over a 24-hour period. In analyzing the proposed arterial deletion in this amendment, the City planning staff utilized traffic generation volumes for the arterials surrounding the proposed deletion and other information provided by the City of Huntington Beach Traffic Division. -3- (1315D) 1.2 Environmental Status On September 4, 1990, the Environmental Assessment Committee (EAC) , in its initial study of the project determined that the project _would result in potential short-term wind/water erosion, air quality, noise and circulation impacts, soils impacts, drainage impacts and loss of mature trees. However, all impacts were associated with subsequent parking lot development rather than with the arterial highway deletion. The EAC determined that all potential adverse impacts could be mitigated to a level of insignificance and recommended processing of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. All recommended mitigation measures were incorporated into the project. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 91-36 for thirty (30) days. Written communications were received from the Environmental Board and the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) . The Environmental Board expressed concerns over the suitability of construction of a parking lot near the landfill and potential hazards associated with methane in the area . In response to the Board' s concerns, staff clarified that the City contracted with Kleinfelder, Inc. to prepare a Landfill Gas Mitigation Investigation and Geotechnical Study. The studies assess the methane and soil conditions for the project site and detail methane ventilation methods and structural specifications for safe parking lot development . The Board also --requested clarification on the proposed parking lot expansion for the Central Library. CIWMB concerns were primarily associated with the types of waste the project would generate and impacts to landfill capacity resulting from subsequent disposal of waste materials . Staff explained that waste materials will predominantly consist of asphalt concrete which is completely recyclable. Due to this and cities ' growing need to reduce waste generation, to comply with AB 939 regulations, the project ' s waste is anticipated to be recycled and thereby have an insignificant effect on landfill capacity. i -4- (1315D) 2 .0 AREA OF CONCERN On November 20, 1990 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on construction of the Central Library Expansion project (Conditional Use Permit No. 90-49) . At that time, the expansion project consisted of three separate phases . Phase 1 consisted of construction of the entire library expansion structure and occupancy of upper floor uses; Phase II consisted of occupancy of lower level uses; and Phase III consisted of expansion of parking lot facilities and reconfiguration of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets. As part of its action at that time, the Planning. Commission conditioned occupancy of Phase II uses upon approval of a Parking Plan by the Planning Commission. Since then, the Department of Library Services has requested construction of the Central Library Expansion project in a single phase. As such, it has submitted a Parking Master Plan for the library expansion. As part of that Master Plan, Library Services and the Department Public Works are also requesting the deletion of a segment of Talbert Avenue (between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets) from the City' s Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways . Staff has prepared Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 to address that deletion. 2 . 1 Background Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets is a secondary arterial which runs east and west across the central portion of the City of Huntington Beach. Additionally, Talbert Avenue has regional significance because it continues into Fountain Valley where it . bridges the Santa Ana River Channel and becomes MacArthur Boulevard which continues through the cities of Costa Mesa, Santa Ana, Irvine and Newport Beach. -5- (1315D) At the present time, Talbert Avenue terminates at Goldenwest Street in the City of Huntington Beach. This has been its terminus since 1976 when Talbert Avenue from Edwards to Goldenwest Street was deleted from the City' s Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways in order to avoid bifurcation of Huntington Central Park. 2. 2 Analysis This section analyzes the proposed deletion of the Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Street in terms of the effects on 1) circulation patterns and projected traffic volumes, 2) emergency vehicle response, 3) existing and future land uses in the area, 4) the City' s participation in the Orange County Arterial Highway Financing Program, and 5) adopted City goals and policies . 2 . 2 . 1 Circulation Patterns and Projected Traffic Volumes The following section analyzes existing traffic volumes and circulation patterns in .the vicinity of the study area. The section also projects future 2010 traffic volumes and circulation patterns with the deletion of the subject segment of Talbert Avenue. It should be noted that although Talbert does have some regional significance, as previously mentioned, both the County of Orange and the City' s Traffic Division have indicated that the previous deletion of Talbert between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets, which. eliminated the possible use of this segment of Talbert as a connection route between the residences in the area to the west of Edwards Street and Beach Boulevard, has virtually eliminated the regional significance of this segment along with any chances that the subject segment of Talbert will ever operate at secondary arterial level. Therefore, it has been determined that this segment of Talbert has little significance to regional circulation patterns ` and does not need to be addressed any further as a regional accessway in this document. Existing Traffic As indicated in Figure 1-1, there are currently four arterials, in addition to Talbert Avenue, on the Circulation Plan which are intended to provide circulation in the Central Library area. Those arterials are: 1) Slater Avenue which is a secondary arterial, 2) Ellis Avenue which is a primary arterial, but is presently constructed as a secondary arterial between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, 3) Goldenwest Street which is planned as a major arterial but is presently constructed as a primary arterial, and 4) Gothard Street which is designated as a secondary arterial. Figure 2-1 depicts existing traffic volumes on the arterials in the immediate project vicinity in terms of Average Daily Trips (ADT) . Talbert Avenue presently conveys 5,300 (ADT) between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, of which approximately 33% (1, 767 ADT) are library associated trips and 66% (3, 533 ADT) are through trips. Talbert Avenue conveys 9, 700 ADT between Gothard Street and Beach Boulevard. These volumes place Talbert Avenue at Level of Service (LOS) A for a secondary arterial. The design capacity (LOS C) for a secondary arterial would be 20, 000 ADT. -6- (1315D) f � I i 5L�T6 R AVE , 15,000 15, 700 LOS A i o io I N I r-1 1 I I I i I i 9 ,700 I LOS A. LOS A f i I - u� o o o O O Z N a _—� E'LLIS 5,300 5 3 0 — LOS A. LOS' A 71 FIGURE 2-1 Existing Traffic Volumes . (ADT) and Levels of Service (LOS) huntington beach planning division Slater Avenue presently conveys 15, 000 ADT between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets and 15, 700 ADT between Gothard Street and Beach Boulevard. These volumes place Slater Avenue at LOS A for a secondary arterial . Ellis Avenue is presently conveying 5,300 ADT between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard. This traffic volume indicates that Ellis Avenue is operating at a LOS A for secondary arterial as it is presently constructed. Goldenwest Street presently conveys 20, 000 ADT between Ellis and Talbert Avenues and 24, 000 ADT between Talbert and Slater Avenues . These traffic volumes indicate that Goldenwest Street is operating at a LOS A for a primary arterial . Gothard Street presently conveys 14, 500 ADT between Ellis and Talbert Avenues and 16, 000 ADT between Talbert and Slater Avenues . These traffic volumes indicate that Gothard Street is operating at LOS A for a primary arterial . The remaining estimated 3, 500 through trips for the portion of Talbert Avenue in question, when redistributed on surrounding arterials (primarily Slater, Ellis, Goldenwest and Gothard) over a 24 hour period is considered minor and can be adequately accommodated without experiencing any noticeable deterioration in service level. All arterials in the project vicinity are currently operating at a LOS of A and are anticipated to continue to do so with the deletion of Talbert. ' Future Impacts of Deletion of Talbert Avenue as an Arterial. between Goldenwest and Gothard In order to examine the long-term impacts of the deletion of the subject section of Talbert Avenue, the City Traffic Division and planning staff conducted an analysis on a long range basis . The analysis evaluates the proposed arterial deletion' s impacts on surrounding arterials based upon projected build out (2010) traffic conditions, as a worse case scenario. Baseline 2010 traffic projections were determined using a Traffic Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. for the Holly-Seacliff. area. Based upon the previously determined percentage of library associated trips, it is estimated that 3, 900 trips (approximately 67% of the 2010 projected trips for the subject segment of Talbert) would be redistributed onto surrounding arterials. Due to the proximity of Slater and Ellis Avenues and Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, it is assumed that a majority of the remaining trips will be redistributed onto these arterials, with a minor percentage being re-routed onto other periphery streets . It should be noted that traffic volume increases to periphery streets resulting from the Talbert Avenue deletion were considered negligible and therefore have not been specified here. Figure 2-3 shows the projected 2010 traffic volumes and levels of service on Slater, Ellis, Goldenwest and Gothard with the deletion of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets . -8- (1315D) � i I A 15 ,900. 19 , 000 LOS A LOS B 0 0 o U � cry o TA L B ERT a�� 9 , 700 LOS A Z M a W -'-� 0 � J 0 U � � LLLfS AvE . 7, 500 6 , 200 LOS A LOS A FIGURE 2-2 Pr6j2cted 2010 Traffic Volumes (ADT) and Levels of Service (LOS) with Talbert Deletion huntington beach planning division Talbert Avenue is anticipated to convey approximately 9,700 ADT between Gothard Street and Beach Boulevard. This volume will continue to place Talbert Avenue at Level of Service (LOS) A for a secondary arterial . It should be noted that anticipated trips along this route are not anticipated to change due to the minor level of use of this segment. Slater Avenue is projected to convey approximately 15, 900 ADT between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets and 19,000 ADT between Gothard Street and Beach Boulevard. These volumes place Slater Avenue at LOS B and LOS A, respectively, for a secondary arterial . This indicates a slight deterioration to service levels along Slater Avenue between Gothard and Beach under build out conditions; however, it should be noted that the slight deterioration in service level is anticipated to be primarily due to increase in the development of the area rather than the deletion of Talbert Avenue and that levels of service will still be well above the City' s standard, at a LOS B. Ellis Avenue is anticipated to convey approximately 7, 500 ADT between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets and 6,2.00 ADT between Gothard Street and Beach Boulevard. These traffic volumes indicate that Ellis Avenue will continue to operate at a LOS A for a primary arterial . Goldenwest Street is projected to convey approximately 30, 800 ADT between Ellis and Talbert Avenues and 34, 700 ADT between Talbert and Slater Avenues . These traffic volumes indicate that Goldenwest Street is anticipated to operate at a LOS A for a major arterial . Gothard Street is projected to convey approximately 14, 200 ADT between Ellis and Talbert Avenues and 19 , 100 ADT between Talbert and Slater Avenues . These traffic volumes indicate that Gothard Street is anticipated to operate at LOS A and LOS C for a secondary arterial . In summary, when projected build out trip generations along Talbert Avenue are redistributed onto the surrounding arterials, over a twenty-four hour period, there will be a negligible impact to the levels of service of those arterials. Arterials in the project vicinity are anticipated to operate at an LOS of C or better. 2.2 .2 Emergency Vehicle Response Fire station planning in the City of Huntington Beach has proceeded ' with the understanding that through access between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets will be available via Talbert Avenue as a secondary arterial as indicated on the City' s Circulation Plan. The subject Talbert segment provides the best access route from the Gothard Street station (see Figure 2-3) to the Huntington Central Park area located on the west of Goldenwest Street at Talbert Avenue. -10- (1315D) a f Z g ims 0 1600 7700 V BOISA x ARGOSY .O Al u � HE Eowcle./ __ MU HEIL WA 'WARNER .. RN E / \ SLATER 1ALBFRI BC1 GO a ELLIS j r- Z LEGEND ; GARFIELD BU - BUSHARD q S ; �YORKTOWN GO - GOTHARD BU ADAMS HE - HEIL /INDIANAPOLIS / LA - LAKE LA /ATLANTA MA MA - MAGNOLIA *EXISTING HAMILION MU - MURDY TO BE ABANDONED BANNING WA - WARNER . PROPOSED / / / GR - GRAHAM BC - BOLSA CHICA FIGURE 2-3 FIRE STATION LOCATIONS HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION However, the Fire Department has indicated that the primary importance of the segment is to provide emergency access to the Central Library which will be maintained and designed to Fire Department standards . (The adequacy of accessways is primarily determined by turning radii and street width and need not be designated to arterial standards . The proposed parking lot design can therefore provide sufficient emergency vehicle access) . The Fire Department has stated that, although it is generally preferred to have the maximum number of access routes possible, this segment of Talbert, due to the existing and anticipated future development patterns in the area and the presence of several acceptable alternate routes (via Slater and Ellis Avenue) , has little significance to their emergency service for the area. Response times in the area currently comply with the city standard of five (5) minutes and are expected to continue to do so regardless of the deletion. In summary, the primary significance of the segment of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Street is to provide emergency access to the Central Library which will not be effected by the proposed deletion. Furthermore, the subject segment provides minimal benefits to Fire Department access capabilities in the area . Alternate emergency response routes via Slater or Ellis Avenue can provide adequate Fire Department access in the project vicinity; therefore, the deletion of the subject segment of Talbert Avenue will have a negligible impact to emergency fire response. 2..2.3 Land Uses The subject segment of Talbert Avenue is surrounded to the north, south and west by area designated as part of the Huntington Beach Central Park. Areas to the east, across Gothard Street primarily consist of industrial uses . Originally, Talbert Avenue was identified as a secondary arterial which ran from Edwards to Gothard Street. However, the segment of Talbert between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets was subsequently deleted (GPA No. 76-3) due to concerns associated with park use compatibility. Although land uses along the subject segment of Talbert are more intense in nature than those along the previously deleted segment, the same issues of incompatibility may still apply. Of primary concern is the issue to safety. In its current state, the subject segment of Talbert traverses an area used for library parking . This requires some library patrons and park users to cross Talbert Aveune traffic. The proposed deletion and the resulting decrease. in the intensity of use (i .e. as a parking area) is expected to significantly reduce conflicts between library/park pedestrian traffic and arterial traffic by reducing traffic speeds and volumes (and generally discouraging through traffic) in the library area. i -12- (1315D) The segment of Talbert is also located in the vicinity of an abandoned landfill site. Presence of peat and organic materials in the vicinity have led to differential street settlement and creation of depressions resulting from• the decomposition of these materials . The underlying soils conditions combined with street usage has resulted in a increase in the frequency of such depressions and has created costly maintenance problems for the street. The Department of Public Works has indicated that the deletion of this segment of Talbert as an arterial will reduce the number of vehicles crossing the property and will slow the creation of such sink spots, thereby, reducing the City' s maintenance costs for the area. A separate land use issue involves the use of the subject segment of - Talbert Avenue as a means of access to businesses on Talbert Avenue. There are presently a large number of small industrial and automotive tennants on the north and south side of Talbert Avenue, east of Gothard Street. Those businesses are typically accessed by customers coming from Beach Boulevard to the east or from Goldenwest Street from the west . Deletion of the subject segment of Talbert Avenue would require that Goldenwest Street customers detour to Ellis or Slater, then back to Talbert, to patronize the businesses. Deletion of the Talbert segment may make the businesses on Talbert more difficult to find and access for customers coming from Goldenwest. That the number of customers to be impacted will be fairly low, however, is borne out by . the low traffic volumes which presently utilize the subject segment of Talbert. The analysis in Section 2 .2 . 1 has indicated that the deletion of the subject segment of Talbert Avenue is a very lightly used arterial and- that its deletion will have a minor effect on the levels of service or surrounding arterials . As described above, elimination of the arterial status of the segment will provide safety benefits to library patrons and parks users as well as possible maintenance cost benefits. 2 .2 .4 Arterial Highway Financing Program The County of Orange presently operates an Arterial Highway Financing Program (AHFP) wherein the individual cities receive funding for arterial highway construction and maintenance. Such funding, however, is contingent upon consistency of the cities ' circulation plans with the County' s Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) . In order to remain eligible for AHFP funding, any city which amends its circulation plan must do so in a coordinated effort with the County. Since the subject segment of Talbert is shown on the County MPAH, deletion of the extension by the City must be done according to the amendment process adopted by the County. The process essentially requires that the Orange County Environmental Management Agency (OCEMA) be informed of the suggested amendment and then supplied with all of the analytical data collected by the City. The OCEMA then recommends approval or denial of the amendment to the Board of Supervisors . -13- (1315D) This Circulation Element Amendment document follows the proper procedure for analyzing an amendment to the Circulation Plan. Because of the very short time-frame of this amendment, the OCEMA has not been able to review the document. However, the City has been working in a coordinated effort with the County during this process . Preliminary discussion between the City staff and OCEMA/Transportation Planning has revealed that the County is in support of the proposed deletion and will make a recommendation to the County Board of Supervisors to delete Talbert from the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, pending receipt of a City Council Resolution requesting the deletion. Therefore, the deletion is not anticipated to result in loss of the AHFP funds . 2.2 . 5 City Goals and Policies The General Plan for Huntington Beach contains statements of goals and policies which are intended to provide guidance and direction for development of the City. Several separate elements contain goals and policies which are applicable to the proposed deletion of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets. The Circulation Element of the General Plan contains policies related to the arterial highway system city-wide. The proposed deletion of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets is consistent with following goals and policies adopted in Section 3 . 1.2 of the Circulation Element: Goal 1. To provide a multi-mode transportation system that ensures the safe and efficient movement of people and goods . Policies 1. Develop a system of arterial streets and highways that ensures the safe and efficient movement of people and goods . 2 . Support the establishment of public transportation systems within the City that are directed toward meeting the mobility needs of the community. 7. Provide a transportation system that is consistent with efforts to minimize adverse environmental and aesthetic effect. The land use compatability analysis in Section 2 .2 .3 of this document indicated that downgrading of Talbert to a parking lot access will reduce the number and speeds of vehicles in the library area, and will provide for safer pedestrian circulation in the library area which is consistent with goal 6 and policy 1. In addition this section has determined that the subject segment is located in the vicinity of an abandoned landfill. Underlying soils conditions combined with arterial level street usage will result in frequent occurrence of sink spots and dspressions in the street. Deletion of Talbert will allow for more appropriate development of a parking lot which will reduce the rate of sinkage and associated maintenance costs and, therefore, is consistent with policy 3 . -14- (1315D) The traffic projections in Section 2 .2 . 1 of this document have indicated that the subject segment of Talbert is a minor component of the City' s Circulation System which is not likely to ever experience arterial levels of use. Deletion of Talbert is consistent with policy 2 by allowing for removal of an unnecessary arterial . The Community Facilities Element addresses the provision of life-threatening hazards community facilities throughout the City and contains goals and policies to provide adequate facilities in the City. Section 3 . 5 . 6 of the Element contains the following policies . 1. Promote the provision of adequate community facilities within the City of Huntington Beach. 4 . Prior to constructing new community facilities, consider the impact of those facilities on annual maintenance and operating costs and staffing requirements for maintenance. Since the deletion of Talbert will allow for subsequent development of needed library parking, the deletion is consistent with policy 1. In addition, as previously mentioned, the deletion will allow for more cost effective development of the property which is consistent with policy 4 . -15- (1315D) 3 . 0 SUMMARY The proposed Circulation Element Amendment will allow for the deletion of an unnecessary arterial designation, as determined by both the City of Huntington Beach Traffic Division and the OCEMA, and will provide. potential safety benefits to library patrons and park users by reducing the number and the speed of vehicles in the library vicinity. The segment of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets is a lightly used arterial which due to previous deletion of its westerly segment will never realize secondary arterial levels of use and will continue to be a minor component of the City' s arterial highway circulation system. Furthermore, due to the low number of through trips conveyed by this segment its proposed deletion will not substantially disrupt current and future traffic flow and levels of service in the area. All surrounding arterials will continue to operate at an LOS of C or better, both at present as in the year 2010 . In addition the subject segment of Talbert is not a vital part of the Fire Department emergency response route system and can be deleted without any noticeable effect on emergency response time in the vicinity. And finally, the deletion of Talbert is consistent with other elements of the General Plan and will specifically facilitate implementation of the goals and policies of the Circulation and Community Facilities Elements . -16- (1315D) huntington beach department of community development STA f f ATTACJ"H MENTNO, REPORT �--� TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE : November 5, 1991 SUBJECT: CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 91-1/CENTRAL LIBRARY PARKING MASTER PLAN/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-36 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, Library Services and Public Works Departments PROPERTY OWNER: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, CA 92648 REQUEST: Deletion of Talbert Avenue (between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets) from the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways and approval of the Central Library Parking Master Plan to allow for additional parking to serve the Central Library expansion project . LOCATION: Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets . DATE ACCEPTED: August 26, 1991 ZONE: CF-R (Community Facilities-Recreational) and Ml-CD (Light Industrial-Civic District) EXISTING USE: Arterial 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Motion to : A. "Approve Negative Declaration No . 91-36 with Mitigation Measures and forward to City Council for adoption; " and B. "Recommend approval of Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 to the City Council by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No . 1452 and forward to City Council for approval ; " and C. "Approve the Central Library Parking Master Plan with findings and conditions of approval . " ,Ag!ftk ,ei, gnaw W= Hip A-FM-23C 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: The Departments of Public Works and Library Services are jointly requesting the deletion of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest Street from the City' s Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways with the replacement of the segment as parking area for the Central Library. The projects have been processed concurrently under one (1) mitigated negative declaration due to the overlapping locations and issues of concern. This staff report separately addresses each project starting with a summary of conclusions of Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 followed by an overview of the Central Library Parking Master Plan. 3 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On September 4 , 1990 , the Environmental Assessment Committee (EAC) , in its initial study of the project determined that the project would result in potential short-term wind/water erosion, air quality, noise and circulation impacts , soils impacts , drainage impacts and loss of mature trees . However, all impacts were associated with subsequent parking lot development rather than with the arterial deletion. The EAC determined that all potential adverse impacts could be mitigated to a level of insignificance and recommended processing of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project . All recommended mitigation measures were incorporated into the project as conditions of approval for the Central Library Parking Master Plan. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No . 91-36 for 30 days . Written communications were received from the Environmental Board and the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) . The Environmental Board expressed concerns over the suitability of construction of a parking lot near the landfill with the potential hazards associated with methane in the area . In response to the Board ' s concerns , staff has clarified that the City contracted with Kleinfelder, Inc . to prepare a Landfill Gas Mitigation Investigation and Geotechnical Study. These studies assess the methane and soil conditions for the project site and detail methane ventilation methods and structural specifications for safe parking lot development . The Board also requested clarification on the proposed parking lot expansion for the Central Library. CIWMB concerns were primarily associated with the types of waste the project would generate and impacts to landfill capacity resulting from the subsequent disposal of these materials . Staff explained that waste materials will predominantly consist of asphalt concrete which is completely recyclable . Due to this and Cities ' growing need to reduce waster generation, to comply with AB 939 regulations , the project generated waste is anticipated to be recycled and thereby have an insignificant effect on landfill capacity. The comments and staff ' s responses have been attached to this staff report (see Attachment No . 5) . Staff Report - 11/5/91 -2- (1275d) Prior to any action on Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Mitigated Negative Declaration No . 91-36 . 4 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: This section summarizes the analysis constained in Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 and discusses the issues associated with the proposed Central Library Parking Master Plan. Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 The proposed project will delete the segment of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets as an arterial . Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 evaluates the Talbert Avenue deletion in terms of the effects on 1) circulation patterns and projected traffic volumes ; 2) emergency vehicle response; 3) existing and further land uses in the area; 4) the City' s participation in the Orange County Arterial Highway Financing Program; and 5) adopted City goals and policies . The Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 document attached to this report contains a detailed analysis of the issues associated with the arterial deletion. The following is a summary of the conclusions of Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 . The subject segment of Talbert is a lightly used arterial (receiving approximately 5 , 300 average trips per day) . Traffic counts conducted by the Traffic Division have indicated that a significant portion (approximately 33%) of these trips are related to Central Library associated activities . The remaining estimated 3 , 500 through trips when redistributed on surrounding arterials (primarily Slater, Ellis , Goldenwest and Gothard) over a 24 hour period are considered minor and can be adequately accommodated without experiencing any noticeable deterioration in service level . All arterials in the project vicinity are currently operating at a LOS of C or better and are anticipated to continue to do so with the deletion of Talbert . The proposed Circulation Element Amendment will allow for the deletion of an unnecessary arterial designation, as determined by both the City of Huntington Beach Traffic Division and the OCEMA, and will provide potential safety benefits to library patrons and park users by reducing the number and the speed of vehicles in the library vicinity. The segment of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets due to previous deletion of its westerly segment will never realize secondary arterial levels of use and will continue to be a minor component of the City' s arterial highway circulation system. Furthermore, due to the low number of through trips conveyed by this segment its proposed deletion will not substantially disrupt current and future traffic flow and levels of service in the area . Staff Report - 11/5/91 -3- ( 1275d) In addition the subject segment of Talbert is not a vital part of the Fire Department emergency response route system and can be deleted without any noticeable effect on emergency response time in the vicinity. And finally, the deletion of Talbert is consistent with other elements of the General Plan and will specifically facilitate implementation of the goals and policies of the Circulation and Community Facilities Elements . Central Library Parking Master Plan On November 20 , 1991 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on construction of the Central Library Expansion project (Conditional Use Permit No . 90-49) . At that time, the expansion project consisted of three (3) separate phases . Phase I consisted of construction of the entire library expansion structure and occupancy of upper floor uses ; Phase II consisted of occupancy of lower level uses; and Phase III consisted of expansion of parking lot facilities and reconfiguration .of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets . As part of its action at that time, the Planning Commission conditioned occupancy of Phase II uses upon approval of a Parking Plan by the Planning Commission. Since then, the Department of Library Services has requested construction of the Central Library Expansion project in a single phase. As such, it has submitted a Parking Master Plan for the library expansion. It should be noted that pursuant to previous Planning Commission direction this is only a Parking Master Plan not a new Conditional Use Permit . This section analyzes the proposed Central Library Parking Master Plan. This section analyzes the two (2) primary issues associated with the Central Library Parking Master Plan, specifically the .provision of adequate parking and circulation and parking lot design. The existing parking lot provides a total of 453 parking spaces . These parking spaces are provided in two (2) areas, one 178 space area north of Talbert adjacent to the library and another 275 space are on the south side of Talbert . The proposed Parking Master Plan will expand the boundaries of the existing parking area, adjacent to the library, to incorporate the Talbert Avenue right-of-way, a portion of the existing parking area on the south side of Talbert, as well as an approximate 1 . 1 acre strip of park area on the north side of Talbert and an approximate 0 . 7 acre strip on the south side of Talbert, into a single 705 space lot (see Figure 1) . Staff Report - 11/5/91 -4- (1275d) Go Lveu wEaT r lip i o -' o 1 , rr (D r O., t. X fv 4 N• ri 1 rr i, I : 4 . N- O _ tzr Cr filial �—, 1 w a 4 � ; a = yp-a -( 'ice' ,;5 �- \;�' _F r bl , -\ - vz t 0 m �\ H C 1` ti H �RI J�k r ; 3 , ` s y a ANTHONY AND LANGFORD AIA ciTr a.,.,-11-0.b-cx - N I ARCHITECTURE•ENGINEERING•PLANNING CENTRAL LIBRARY EXPANSION The City Zoning Code does not contain any specific parking standards for libraries . However, staff believes that due to the intense variety of uses previously approved for the library expansion project, the library is more of a multi-media/resource center than a traditional library. As such, staff . determined that parking requirements for the expansion should be based upon the square footage of each approved of use. Parking need for the library with expansion was then calculated based upon the following ratios . Office, reading rooms, and stack areas are parked at 1 space/300 square feet; and conference rooms and auditorium areas are parked at 1 space/35 square feet . Based upon these factors a total of 704 spaces would be required to serve the site. The Parking Master Plan will provide a total of 704 spaces . This consists of 333 standard size (9 ' x 19" ) spaces, 363 compact spaces (of which 189 are 7 ' 9" x 12 ' 6" and 174 are 9 ' x 16 ' 6" ). and 8 handicap spaces . It should be noted that the proposed compact spaces do not comply with compact parking. provisions of the zoning code . The plan proposes approximately 52% compact spaces; this is approximately 32% (222) spaces more than the 20% maximum (141) spaces permitted by code . In addition, none of the compact spaces meet the minimum 9 ' x 17" dimension requirements specified by code . However, this is a conceptual plan and it is possible that 141 of the 9 ' x 16 ' x 6" spaces can be redesigned to meet code by incorporating surplus aisle width areas . The remaining 222 spaces should be redesigned to comply with standard size parking space requirements . Circulation throughout the parking lot is provided via two (2) 30 foot wide main accessways one (1) which runs along the western portion of the lot and provides access to the northern parking spaces and the other which serves as the primary library accessway and connects Goldenwest and Gothard Streets . The accessway . incorporates curves and bends as well as two (2) traffic circles, one (1) located near each entrance point to slow traffic and discourage through trips . The exact configuration of traffic circles have not yet been established and will be required to meet Public Works standards . Internal circulation and parking space access will be provided through 27 foot wide drive aisles . These aisles exceed code provisions which require a 26 foot aisle width. The plan provides one (1) crosswalk between the primary accessway and southerly parking areas, see A on Figure 1, to provide safe pedestrian access to the library. Staff is requesting that the Public Works Department look into the need for providing additional crosswalks near the library enchance (see B, Figure 1) and/or a stop sign at the intersection of the primary circulation route and the aisleway which runs immediatly in front of the library (see C, Figure 1) for incorporation on final plans . Staff Report - 11/5/91 -5- (1275d) Staff also recommends that the plan be designed to incorporate a wider drop off/bus turnout in front of the new childrens library (area D, Figure 1) so that drop off traffic won' t conflict with other parking lot traffic. The primary accessway is currently 38 feet wide in this area and may be widened slightly to provide an acceptable loading area . These elements have been incorporated as conditions of approval . 5 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 with the following findings and the Central Library Parking Master Plan with the following findings and conditions of approval : FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 91-1 : 1 . Deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets will not result in substantial future impacts to surrounding arterials and the ability of the Circulation System to serve the Central Library area, since projected buildout levels of service or surrounding arterials with the deletion will be at LOS C or better . 2 . Deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets , will not negatively impact the future provision of emergency vehicle response to the Central Library area, since several adequate alternative response routes are available which will not deteriorate the Fire Departments five (5) minute response time to the area . 3 . Deletion of Talbert, between Goldenwest and Gothard as an arterial is consistent with the other elements of the General Plan. 4 . Deletion of Talbert, between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets , is consistent with Circulation Element policies for the development of a system of arterial streets and highways that ensures the safe and efficient movement of people and goods by improving safety for library patrons and park uses by downgrading the levels of traffic and traffic speeds in the library area . 5 . Deletion of Talbert, between Goldenwest and Gothard Strees , is consistent with the Community Facilities Element policies for providing adequate community facilities by providing adequate parking facilities and providing a more cost effective use of the property. 6 . Deletion of Talbert Avenue, . between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, will allow for removal of an unnecessary arterial designation since previous deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Edwards Streets , prevented the possibility of future arterial level use or the subject segment . Staff Report - 11/5/91 -6- (1275d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CENTRAL LIBRARY PARKING MASTER PLAN: 1 . The Central Library Parking Master Plan will not be deterimental to the general health, welfare and safety of the neighborhood or . City in general . 2 . The Central Library Parking Master Plan will allow for the provision of needed parking facilities to serve future Central Library facilities . 3 . The Central Library Parking Master Plan will provide for safer circulation of library and park pedestrian traffic . 4 . The Central Library Parking Master Plan will promote a . more cost effective use of a landfill area . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CENTRAL LIBRARY PARKING MASTER PLAN: 1 . The site plan received and dated October 2 , 1991 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications : a . Compact parking spaces shall not exceed 20% of total number of parking spaces and shall have a minimum dimension of 9 ' x 17" . b. Comply with all provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 2 . The applicant shall implement the following mitigation measures identified in Mitigated Negative Declaration No . 91-36 : a . During construction, the applicant shall : 1 . Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; and 2 . Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. b. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for approval . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project will also be submitted prior to issuance of grading permit . c . Prior to issuance of grading permits , a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer for proposed parking areas located on the south side of Talbert . This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, soil corrosivity, fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities . The project shall implement the recommendations contained therin. Staff Report - 11/5/91 -7- (1275d) d. During construction, the applicant shall : - 1 . Use low sulfur fuel ( 105% by weight) for construction equipment; 2 . Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts) ; and 3 . Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts . e. Prior to issuance of grading permit, hydroloyg/hydraulic studies shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval . f . Drainage flows from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed. Flows shall be accommodated per Public Works requirements . g . Prior to issuance of grading permits , plans depicting the location, type, size, and quantity of all existing plan material which will be removed or relocated as a result of the parking lot development shall be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works . h. Existing mature trees on the site shall be retained and incorporated into the site plan if feasible . Any existing mature tree that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2 : 1 ratio with 36 inch box trees which shall be incorporated into the project ' s landscape plan. i . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7 : 00 AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays . j . Prior to issuance of grading permits , a traffic control plan shall be submitted to Public Works for approval . 3 . Prior to initiation of demolition activities, the contractor shall submit a methane health and safety plan which specifies the precautionary measures which will be implemented to protect workers during project construction. 4 . The proposed parking lot shall implement all measure identified in the "Gothard Street Landfill Gas Migration Investigation" prepared by Kleinfelder, Inc . (September, 1991) to minimize the potential methane related hazards . 5 . If leachate is discovered during construction, construction acitivites shall be halted and a consultant shall be retained to assess the condition and develop a mitigation plan before construction is allowed to continue. 6 . Access shall be designed to comply with. Fire Department standards . Staff Report - 11/5/91 -8- (1275d) 7 . The plan shall incorporate traffic control signage and - crosswalks pursuant to Public Works standards . 8 . Parking lot accessways and traffic circles shall be designed to Public Works specifications . 9 . The plan shall incorporate a bus turnout pursuant to Public Works standards . 10 . The plan shall be reviewed by the Public Works, Planning and Fire Departments prior to final approval . 6 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: A. The Planning Commission may approve Negative Declaration No . 91-36 with Mitigation Measures and forward to City Council for adoption; and B. The Planning Commission may recommend denial of Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 and forward to the -City Council for denial . C. The Planning Commission may approve the Central Library Parking Master Plan as the Circulation Plan is not intended to establish the precise alignment of Talbert which can subsequently be realigned to run south of the Central Library Parking Master Plan through the Precise Plan of Street Alignment process and will not preclude development of the parking plan. ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Area map 2 . Planning Commission Resolution No . 1452 3 . Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 4 . Negative Declaration No. 91-36 (with Mitigation Measures) 5 . Response to comments 6 . Memo from Bob Eichblatt, City Engineer, dated August 22, 1991 . 7 . Letter from Environmental Board dated September 26, 1991 8 . Letter from California Integrated Waste Management Board dated October 7, 1991 9 . Alternative findings for denial HS: : kj 1 Staff Report - 11/5/91 -9- (1275d) �' i o 02 RI Rli mi M I R1 R C F bi R2 RI R 3 il -LA�A NE MAI MI-CD ` M I CF R2 -R R1 laiPf R1 R1 �Si E .r...��... /� I .+. �' I ! I I RONALD =R-2 ml m I R1 R2 R 2 R1 R1 CF-R m I I-CD R1 RI S TALBE— -1 M�1-C D E R 1 MI-A COR2 R I R1 R1 R� CD al MI-A R4 SR c R R CF-R MI-CD MI - A R4j R 1:: -SR o D R I R C C,F-R ----------- --------------- RI R1 (PA-0-CD) MI CD m I ml� ONTARIO DR CF-R R IF RI R1 R1 CF-c R --OU1:IIEC DR RI MI R1 o CF CEA91-1/NP91-36 HUNTINGTON BEACH RESOLUTION NO 1452 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 91-1 WHEREAS, Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 has been prepared and analyzed in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 5 , 1991; and Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 proposes the following amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan: THAT PORTION OF TALBERT AVENUE BETWEEN GOLDENWEST STREET AND GOTHARD STREET BE DELETED FROM THE CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL STREETS AND HIGHWAYS; and Whereas, the Planning Commission held a public hearing pursuant to Government Code Section 65353 on November 5 , 1991, to consider said Circulation Element Amendment; and The Planning Commission is required to make a recommendation to the City Council on the amendment to the General Plan pursuant to Government Code Section 65354 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach as follows : SECTION 1 : The Planning Commission desires to update and refine the Circulation Plan of Arterials Streets and Highways in keeping with changing community needs and objectives . SECTION 2 : Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 will not result in substantial future impacts to surrounding arterials or the ability of the circulation system to serve the Central Library area . SECTION 3 : Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 will not adversely impact emergency vehicle response to the Central Library area . SECTION 4 : Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 is consistent with the other Elements of the General Plan. SECTION 5 : Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 implements the goals and policies of the Circulation Element of the General Plan by facilitating safe and efficient movement of people in the Central Library area . SECTION 6 : Circulation Element Amendment No . 91-1 implements the policies of the Community Facilities Element by facilitating the provision of adequate community facilities . -1- SECTION 7 : The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach hereby adopts said amendment to the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said amendment to the Circulation Element of the City of Huntington Beach is recommended for adoption by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of November, 1991 by the following roll call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Mike Adams , Director Kirk Kirkland, Chairman ( 1275d-12 , 13) -2- CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT 91 - 1 Huntington Beach Planning Division CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ? INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINCTON BEACH To File From Julie Osugi Assistant Planner Subject ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Date September 4, 1991 FORM NO. 91-36 Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: Deletion of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Street as an arterial on the City's Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways to allow for subsequent development of a parking lot in conjunction with the Huntington Beach Central Library expansion project. Location: Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets. Background Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment form noted above and has determined that a negative declaration may be filed for the project. In view of this, a draft negative declaration was prepared and was published in the Daily Pilot for a thirty (30) day public review period commencing Tuesday, September 10, 1991 and ending Thursday, October 10 1991. If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration are received, you will be notified immediately. Recommendation The Environmental Assessment Committee recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 91-36 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Mitigation Measures X The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resulting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval. JO:lp (0673d-2) 1. LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Notice is hereby given by the Department of Community Development, Planning Division of the City of Huntington Beach that the following Draft Negative Declaration request has been prepared and will be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission for their consideration. The Draft Negative Declaration will be available for public review and comment for thirty (30) days. commencing Tuesday, September 10, 1991. Draft Negative Declaration No. 91-36 in conjunction with Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 is a request to delete Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets as an arterial on the City of Huntington Beach Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways to allow for subsequent development of a parking lot in conjunction with the Huntington Beach Central Library expansion project. A copy of the request is on file with the Department of Community Development, City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. Any person wishing to comment on the request may do so in writing within twenty-one (21) days of this notice by providing written comments to the Department of Community Development, Environmental Resources Section, P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, CA 92648. (0673d-4) i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-36 1 . Name of Proponent: City of Huntington Beach Address: 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Phone Number: (714) 536-5271 2. Date Checklist Submitted for Review: September 4, 1991 3. Concurrent Entitlement(s) : Circulation Element Amendment No. 91-1 4, Proiect Location: Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets 5. Project Description: Deletion of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard Street from the City's Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways to allow for subsequent development of a parking lot in conjunction with the Huntington Central Library Expansion project. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of answers are included after each subsection.) Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? _ _ X_ b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X- C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? - X Yes Maybe No f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? _ X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ X Discussion (a—g) : Deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, from the City's Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways consists of a map amendment and will not result in any earth related impacts. However, subsequent development of the area .as a parking lot for Central Library will result in some disruptions, displacements, compaction and overcovering of soil as well as changes in topography and short—term increases in wind/water erosion. (b,c,d) The proposed parking lot site currently slopes downward to the north. Existing elevations range from approximately 47 feet at the southern edge of the site to 20.0 feet at the northern edge. Development of the parking lot proposes grading;of the site to an elevation of 38.5 feet at the south edge, sloping downward to the north to an elevation of 24 feet, as well as compaction and overcovering with paving and landscaping. The proposed grading will alter the existing topography by leveling off the existing changes in grade. The Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed plan and has indicated that the grading is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse impacts. Drainage related impacts associated with the proposed grading and paving have been discussed under #3. b. Trading and construction of the proposed project area are anticipated to result in short—term increases in wind and water erosion in the area. Increased water erosion may potentially impact siltation in Talbert Lake. However with implementation of mitigation measures no. 1 & 2 contained below, no significant impact is anticipated. (a & g) The project is not located within the Alquist—Priolo Special Hazards Study Zone; however the southern edge of Talbert Avenue is bounded by the Huntington Beach Landfill . Kleinfelder, Inc. has prepared a geotechnical report which analyzes the suitability of the project site for development of the proposed parking lot. The study found a deep layer of organic material which may result in surficial settlement over _he long—term due to decomposition. Parking lot maintenance issues have been discussed under 14. However, :he study indicates that analysis of organic materials do not reveal highly active decomposition rates. The report concluded that the parking lot could be developed as proposed using surficial grading to improve site characteristics. Although most of the parking areas are proposed to be located north of Talbert Avenue, some of the areas are proposed for the south side of Talbert and may be located over the landfill . The study discussed above did not analyze areas south of Talbert; therefore, suitability of soils south of Talbert for parking lot development is not known. However with implementation of mitigation measures no. 3 contained below, no significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: 1 . During construction, the applicant shall : a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. Environmental Checklist —2— (0627d) Yes Maybe No 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for approval . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project will also be submitted prior to issuance of grading permit. 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer for proposed parking areas located on the south side of Talbert. This analysis shall include on—site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, soil corrosivity, fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ X Discussion: Deletion of the segment of Talbert Avenue is not anticipated to result in substantial increases in air emissions. Although removal of the arterial will result in the rerouting of trips onto surrounding arterials, a study conducted by the Traffic Division to assess impacts associated with deletion of the arterial , has indicated that trips on this segment of Talbert consist primarily of Library customers. The number of through trips which would -be rerouted was determined to be insignificant. Furthermore, the additional distance traveled as a result of the reroute was determined to be one mile. Rerouting of additional trips onto more efficiently operating surrounding arterials is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse air quality impacts. Some additional short—term dust and construction equipment emissions may result during the grading and construction phases of the proposed parking lot development. However, with implementation of the mitigation measure no. 1 from the earth impacts section and the mitigation measure identified below, no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: 1 . During construction, the applicant shall : a. Use low sulfur fuel ( .05% by weight) for construction equipment; b. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); C. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ _ X C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ _ X Discussion (b—c) : No objectional odors or climatic changes are anticipated to result from the proposed project. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? _ _ X Discussion: See 3b. Environmental Checklist —3— (0627d) �. Yes Maybe No Discussion: See 3b. b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X Discussion: Deletion of Talbert Avenue as an arterial , between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, is not .anticipated to result in any drainage impacts. However, subsequent parking lot development may alter drainage and runoff in the area. Runoff in the area currently flows toward Talbert Lake. Drainage from properties located to the south passes through the proposed project site. Proposed grading for subsequent parking lot development may alter drainage patterns in the area. However, with implementation of mitigation measures identified below, runoff from southern properties will not be obstructed. No significant impacts to drainage patterns are anticipated. Development of parking facilities will result in an increase of impervious surfaces in the area which in turn, will result in an increase in runoff. Parking area runoff will be collected on—site and will be directed into the City's storm drain system. With implementation of mitigation measures identified below, no significant impact is anticipated. Over the long—term, decomposition of underlying organic materials may result in the formation of depressions which may trap runoff and prevent proper drainage. However, drainage impediments resulting from such depressions are anticipated to be minimal and can be reduced further through diligent parking lot maintenance. No significant impact is anticipated. Mitigation: 1 . Prior to issuance of grading permit, hydrology/hydraulic studies shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval . 2. Drainage flows from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed. Flows shall be accommodated per Public Works requirements. C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? _ _ X_ Discussion: The project site is not located in the flood zone and does not propose any structures or activities which will alter flood courses or flood flows. d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? _ _ X Discussion: See 3b. e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ X Discussion: Se 3b. f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed project does not involve any activities which will alter groundwaters. g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _ X Discussion: See 3f. Environmental Checklist —4— (0627d) Yes Maybe No h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? — _ X Discussion: Deletion of Talbert and construction of the proposed parking facilities is not anticipated to result in substantial increases in water usage or depletion of public water supplies. Primary water usage will be for irrigation of landscaped areas and is not anticipated to be significant. i . Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ _ X Discussion: See 3c. 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? _ X Discussion: See 4b. b. Reduction of the numbers of any mature, unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X Discussion: Subsequent development of the parking lot will result in the removal of several shrubs and mature trees. However, with implementation of mitigation measure identified below,.. no significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: 1 . Prior to issuance of grading permits, plans depicting the location, type, size, and quantity of all existing plant material which will be removed or relocated as a result of the parking lot development shall be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works plans. 2. Existing mature trees on the site shall be retained and incorporated into the site plan if feasible. Any existing mature tree that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2:1 rati.o with 36" box trees which shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X _ Discussion: Subsequent development of the parking lot proposes provision of minor landscaped areas which may result in the introduction of new plant materials in the area. However, no significant impact is anticipated. d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? _ _ X Discussion: No agricultural crop will be impacted. 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? — X Environmental Checklist =5— (0627d) Yes Maybe No C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the._ migration or movement of animals? _ _ X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ X _ Discussion (a-d) : Subsequent development of Central Library Parking facilities will result in the removal of some shrubs and several mature trees. The plant materials to be removed constitute a small portion of the Central Park area and is not anticipated to have a significant impact on animals which may use the area since other areas of the park will still be available.. Previously prepared biological assessments (EIR 89-7) of the proposed area have indicated that the project area is not used by any unique, rare or endangered species. No significant adverse impact is anticipated. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? _ _ X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _ _ X Discussion: Deletion of Talbert Avenue and subsequent development of Central Library Parking Areas is not anticipated to result in any substantial increases in noise in the project area. Additional traffic re-routed, as a result of the deletion of Talbert, is not anticipated to be substantial . Noise impacts resulting from additional traffic when distributed among surrounding arterials is considered negligible. Some short-term noise impacts may result from grading and construction activities associated with parking lot development. However, with implementation of the mitigation measure identified below, no significant impact is anticipated. Mitigation: 1 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? _ _ X Discussion: Deletion of Talbert Avenue and subsequent development of Central Library parking areas is anticipated to result in an increase of parking area lighting for security purposes. However, the project area is not located adjacent to any sensitive uses. With implementation of the mitigation measure identified below, no significant impact is anticipated. Mitigation: 1 . If lighting is included in the parking lot and/or recreation area energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g. , high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X Environmental Checklist -6- (0627d) Yes Maybe No Discussion: The project consists of a Circulation Element Amendment. The amendment proposes deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, from the City's Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways to allow for construction of additional parking facilities for the Central Library. The project will locate a parking lot over the existing streets. Surrounding properties consisting of parking area (to be abandoned), vacant land fill to the south, library and park facilities to the north and Goldenwest and Gothard Streets to the west and east, respectively. The proposed project design will maintain library access from both Goldenwest and Gothard Streets but will discourage through traffic. The Public Works Department has analyzed compatibility issues associated with removal of this segment of Talbert Avenue and construction/operation of a parking area. Their analysis resulted in the following findings. Traffic counts conducted for this segment of Talbert indicate that trips are minimal and primarily consist of library customers. If Talbert Avenue were effectively closed to through traffic, rerouted trips could easily be accommodated by Slater, Ellis, Goldenwest and Gothard. Therefore, based upon traffic volumes, the library section of Talbert is not necessary for through movements. The proposed parking lot layout maintains through access between Gothard and Goldenwest Streets and .allows for Fire Department response movement. Fire response will also be augmented with the installation of opticom devices on Ellis. No significant adverse impact to Fire response time is anticipated. Based upon geotechnical studies which have identified the presence of landfill/organic materials and previous differential settlement along this reach of Talbert, which has been accelerated by arterial level traffic use, it is recommended that Talbert be reduced to a library accessway. Based upon the above, as well as a compatibility with surrounding land uses, no significant adverse land use impacts are anticipated. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X b. Substantial depletion of any non—renewable natural resource? _ _ X Discussion (a,b) : Deletion of Talbert Avenue and construction of the Central Library parking lot is not anticipated to result in any substantial increases in the use of natural resources or energy supplies. 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ _ X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? _ X Discussion: The project proposes deletion of Talbert Avenue as an arterial . However, emergency access between Gothard and Goldenwest Streets through the project site will still be available. Emergency fire response will also be augmented with the installation of opticom devices on Ellis. 11 . Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of Environmental Checklist —7— (0627d) r` t= Yes Maybe No the human population of an area? _ _ X Discussion: The project will not impact population, location, distribution, density or growth in the area. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ — X Discussion: The project will not affect housing in the area. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X Discussion: The proposed expansion of the library is primarily intended to serve existing uses which currently operate from the Central Library; the only true expansion of use will result from the operation of the theater. Therefore, increases in existing trip generation are only anticipated in association with the theater facilities. Library Services has indicated that theater use will be limited to the evenings during the week and on afternoons and evenings during the weekends. Based upon this, the Traffic Division has determined that trip generations resulting from the project will not impact peak hour traffic. Therefore, no significant adverse traffic impacts are anticipated. Furthermore, the Traffic Division has analyzed traffic impacts associated with week day morning and afternoon usage of the theater which would increase peak hour traffic. Based upon this worse case analysis, the Traffic Division has determined that traffic increases resulting from the prbposed project are not anticipated to be substantial . No significant adverse impact is anticipated. b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new off—site parking? _ X Discussion: The City of Huntington Beach zoning code does not contain any specific parking standards for libraries. Staff has analyzed the parking required to serve the library expansion. Parking need was assessed based upon parking generation factors for existing and future uses in the library (1/300 sq. ft. for offices, reading rooms and stacks and 1/35 sq. ft. for conference rooms) . Based upon these factors, a total of 705 spaces will be required to serve the expansion. The proposed plan shows 705 spaces. No significant adverse parking impacts are anticipated. C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? _ X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X Discussion: Talbert Avenue is currently a secondary arterial which provides east/west circulation through the City. Talbert also continues through Fountain Valley and crosses over the Santa Ana River Channel to connect with Macarthur Blvd. in the cities of Costa Mesa and Santa Ana. The project proposes deletion of Talbert Avenue as a secondary arterial from its existing terminus, at Goldenwest Street, to Gothard Street to the east. Through traffic will not be obstructed; but, through the proposed design, will be discouraged. The Traffic Division has conducted traffic counts along the subject segment. The counts have indicated that trips along this segment are predominantly library oriented and that use of this route by through traffic is minimal . Furthermore, previous deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Edwards Streets, has effectively prevented the possibility of arterial level traffic use along the subject segment of Talbert. The Traffic Division has determined that re—routed through trips can adequately be accommodated by surrounding arterials. The City has also received notice from the County of Orange EMA that they support the elimination of the, subject section of Talbert and will recommend to the County Board of Supervisors the deletion of Talbert Avenue from the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways. Environmental Checklist —8— (0627d) Yes Maybe No Some short—term circulation impacts are anticipated during the grading and construction phases of the proposed parking lot. During these phases it is expected that library access and through traffic will be obstructed. However, obstructions will be short—term and with implementation of the mitigation measure identified below, no significant adverse impact is anticipated. Mitigation: 1 . Prior to issuance of grading permits, a traffic control plan shall be submitted to Public Works for approval . e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? — _ X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? — _ X Discussion: Deletion of Talbert Avenue combined with expansion and reconfiguration of the library parking facilities will eliminate existing hazards associated with pedestrian traffic crossing Talbert Avenue from existing parking areas located on the southside of Talbert. These parking areas will be abandoned once new parking facilities are available. 1�. Public Services . Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X_ b. Police protection? _X C. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X Discussion: The proposed parking lot will not encroach onto usable park areas. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. e. Maintenance of public facilities., including roads? X _ f. Other governmental services? _ X Discussion (e,f) : Proposed parking facilities will be constructed and maintained by the City. . However, the Public Works Department has indicated that maintenance of the parking facilities would be snore cost efficient than maintenance of Talbert Avenue as a secondary arterial . Existing City services can adequately accommodate construction and maintenance of the proposed project. No significant impact is anticipated. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ _ X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing source of energy, or require the development of sources of energy? — _ X Discussion (a,b) : See 9 (a,b) . Environmental Checklist —9— (0627d) Yes Maybe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? _ X b. Communication systems? _ _ X C. Water? _ _ X d. Sewer or septic tanks? _ _ X e. Storm water drainage? _ _ X_ f. Solid waste and disposal? _ X Discussion: No additional utility systems or substantial alterations to existing systems will be required to serve the proposed project. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _ _X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? - X Discussion: The proposed parking lot will not encroach onto usable park area. No significant adverse impacts to the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities provided by Huntington Central Park are anticipated. 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ _ X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? _ X C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? _ X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? _ X Discussion (a—d): The project site is not located in the vicinity of any known archaeological sites or other cultural resources. No significant adverse impact is anticipated. Environmental Checklist —10— (0627d) Yes Maybe ' No 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sub— stantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ X Discussion: See discussion for item #5. b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short—term, to the disadvantage of long—term, environmental goals? (A short—term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long—term impacts will endure well into the future.) X C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively consid— erable? (A project may .impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) _ X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ _ X DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. DatL Sig ture c Revised: March, 1990 For: City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department Environmental .Checklist —11— (0627d) < S a v a S < u z � / 0 a 0 1600 3100 t1 BOLSA 0 x ARGOSY ` < x r-� Z o� u p hk FADDENZ O < IS 3 EDINGER NFII WARNER WARNER IT \ SLATER IAI Ef eI _ EIIiS Y !J r N z l P f n J < J 3 GA—ELD S`;70;.5 i ? tGRr.rowN a� 9 ADA MS l /INDIAIIA1OEI3 I / AILANIA I NAMILrON /EANNING m VICINITY MAP IRS HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION i RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-36 IMPACT MITIGATION Grading and construction activities will 1 . During construction, the applicant shall : result in short—term wind and water erosion impacts. a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in allareas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for approval . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project will also be submitted prior to issuance of grading permit. Portions of the proposed parking lot are Prior to issuance of grading permits, a detailed soils located ever the Huntington Beach Landfill . analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer for proposed parking areas located on the south side of Talbert. This analysis shall include on—site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, soil corrosivity, fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. Grading and construction activities will 1 . During construction, the applicant shall : result in short—term dust and construction equipment emissions. a. Use low sulfur fuel ( .05% by weight) for construction equipment; b. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts) ; i c. Discontinue construciton during second stage smog alerts. Proposed grading and parking lot development 1 . Prior to issuance of grading permit, hydrology/ may impact drainage in the area. hydraulic studies shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval . Environmental Checklist —12— (0627d) i IMPACT MITIGATION 2. Drainage flows from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed. Flows shall be accommodated per Public Works requirements. Parking lot development will result in the 1 . Prior to issuance of grading permits, plans removal of trees and shrubs. depicting the location, type, size, and quantity of all existing plant material which will be removed or relocated as a result of the parking lot development shall be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works. 2. Existing mature trees on the site shall be retained and incorporated into the site plan if feasible. Any existing mature tree that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio with 36" box trees which shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. Grading and construction activities will 1 . Construction shall be limited to Monday — Saturday result in short—term noise impacts. 1:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. Grading and construction activities will 1 . Prior to issuance of grading permits, a traffic obstruct access to the library. control plan shall be submitted to Public Works for approval . Environmental Checklist —13— (0627d) MH LrZ21 i EXISTING17 LIBRARY I i 41� j NC W EXPANSION 'S' i. ,� p (1 V�� Via' •'• �/�! °i�,n lj Or fiT la La i � ��) � I I P I h'(1"+1•�'t"_,--'.l.� 4tr S ? t� •�I. (_ .� `��•�y y �p I I \ �'' `\ �y�j;Tae� �I� ' r�I vy, fu`�%��1�•air _. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH LIBRARY ADDITION ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS 31TE PLAN 705 PARKING ;DACES MASTER PARKING PLAN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-36 1 . Environmental Board Comment : A subcommittee of the Board has reviewed the assessment and with the endorsement of the full Board recommends that more information be developed concerning Items 1(a) and (g) , specifically the suitability of the former landfill area south of Talbert which is proposed for development as a parking lot . For example, Staff reports in relevant part as follows : "Kleinfelder, Inc . has prepared a geotechnical report which analyzes the suitability of the project site for development of the proposed parking lot . The study found a deep layer of organic material which may result in surficial settlement over the long-term due to decomposition . . .However , the study indicates that analysis of organic materials do not reveal highly active decomposition rates . The report concluded that the parking lot could be developed as proposed using surficial grading to improve site characteristics . Although most of the parking areas are proposed to be located north of Talbert Avenue, some of the areas are proposed for the south side of Talbert and may be located over the landfill . The study discussed above did not analyze areas south of Talbert ; therefore , suitability of soils south of Talbert for parking lot development is not known . However , with implementation of mitigation measures (sic) no . 3 contained below, no significant impacts are anticipated . " Mitigation measure no . 3 provides , "Prior to issuance of grading permits , a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer for proposed parking areas located on the south side of Talbert . This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading , soil corrosivity, fill properties , foundations , retaining walls , streets , and utilities . " The Board believes that given the potential for methane gas leakage and explosion, questions concerning the suitability of the former landfill area south of Talbert for Development as a parking lot should be answered before the Planning Commission grants approval of the project . Response: This issue has been dealt with in detail in Kleinfelder ' s study entitled "Gothard Street Landfill Gas Migration Investigation" dated September, 1991 and also in their Geotechnical Study dated October 9 , 1990 , which was specifically developed for this proposed parking lot design . The Methane Migration Study recommends the type of Methane Mitigation Measure, specifically a methane ventilation system to be installed under the parking lot . The Geotechnical Study specifically details what type of structural section this parking lot should receive, considering underlying refuse and peat . The Public Works Department has indicated that should the project be approved, the City will implement the recommendations of both studies in construction of the project . 2 . Environmental Board Comment : The Board also recommends clarification of the discussion in response to Item 13 (b) . Item 13 (b) says that the project may have an impact on existing parking facilities . The discussion says in relevant part that , "The City of Huntington Beach zoning code does not contain any specific parking standards for libraries . Staff has analyzed the parking required to serve the library expansion . . . a total of 705 spaces will be required to serve the expansion. The proposed plan shows 705 spaces . No significant adverse parking impacts are anticipated .." The Board wonders whether Staff might find library parking requirements in a source other than the City ' s zoning code . For example , in the County Building Code, or in another source addressing the parking needs of public buildings in general . Also, the Board recommends clarification by Staff of the issue of the 705 parking spaces shown by the plan. Are these 705 additional spaces that don ' t exist today, or is this the number of spaces presently existing? Response: Although the City zoning code does not provide specific parking requirements for library uses , staff believes that due to the combination of facilities which will be available at the Central Library, the completed library will be more of a resource center than a traditional library. As such, the library is anticipated to generate a greater level of activity than a traditional library. Due to this , staff determined that required parking for the library expansion should be based upon the total number of spaces required for each specific use . The required parking was calculated as follows . Parking for office, reading room and slack areas was calculated at one space per 300 square feet based upon the City' s parking standards for office space . Conference room and auditorium areas were parked at one. space per 35 square feet based upon the City' s parking' requirement for public meeting facilities . Using these standards , the total parking required for the library, once completed, is 705 spaces . The library presently provides 453 spaces ; the proposed project will .reconfigure and expand the existing parking area to provide a total of 705 spaces . 3 . CIWMB Comment : In order to help decision-makers , l) identify potential impacts from construction and demolition projects , 2) determine whether any such impacts are significant, and 3) ascertain whether significant impacts can be mitigated to a level of insignificance, CIWMB staff request that the final ND include the following information: A. Since mitigated measures are included in the document , the title of this document ' should be changed to "Mitigated Negative Declaration . " B . Identification of the final disposal site(s) for the project ' s anticipated waste generation . C . Identification of the anticipated types and quantities of solid wastes to be generated upon implementation of the plan; both during construction phases and at the project completion . D . Identification of the potential impacts of these quantities on remaining landfill capacities and the calculated site-life associated thereof . Response: (A) Comment noted . (B, C, D) The project has not been approved , as such, no contractor has been selected to construct the new parking facilities . Therefore, it is not known which landfill facilities contractors will be used to dispose of waste materials . Although the city cannot legally require that the contractor dispose of the waste materials at any specific site, it should be noted that there is an existing pavement recycling center located at the southwest corner of Talbert and Gothard, adjacent to the project site, which is a possible disposal site for the materials : Furthermore, waste materials will predominantly consist of asphalt concrete (A.C. ) which is completely recyclable . In light of new legislation (AB 939) which requires cities to reduce their waste generation, it is anticipated that the materials will be recycled, wherever they are disposed of and will , therefore, have a negligible impact on landfill capacities . 4 . CIWMB Comment : The construction of new parking facilities may increase the generation of waste being sent to landfills . To minimize the amount of solid waste going into landfills , staff recommends that- the following measures be considered in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) : A. Implementation of a recycling program at any parking facilities . B . Promote the use of products made of recycled materials (e . g . , asphalt , inerts) in 'the construction of structures for the project . C. Promote the inclusion of waste collection storage areas such as drop off bins into the design of the project . Response: (A, B, C) The project is a flat parking lot . It will employ A.C . on aggregate base or full depth A.C. All of these products are recyclable . Implementation of recycling programs and promotion of bins is not anticipated at this time; however , the library board at some later date might consider such a proposal for the whole lot . 5 . CIWMB Comment : A. Page 2 , discussion on items (a) and (g) . The MND stated that the southern edge of Talbert Avenue is bounded by the Huntington Beach Landfill . It is also stated that other proposed parking areas will be located on the south side of Talbert Avenue and may be located over the landfill . While it is true that Kleinfelder, Inc . has prepared a geotechnical report which analyzes the suitability of the project site for development of the proposed parking lot , there was no mention in the study of possible exposure of construction workers to landfill gas and how it will be mitigated, as a result of disruptions , displacements and compaction of soil materials . B. Because of the potential impact to the public---health and safety, what precautionary measures will be taken? Would there be a Health and Safety Plan developed? C. Is the Huntington Beach Landfill active or closed? D. Would there be an enclosed structure ( i . e . , guard house) in the proposed parking facility? If so, please indicate in the map . Response: (A, B) Even though this is a closed landfill and methane production is at the end of its -life cycle curve, the City intends to put the contractor on notice and require that he develop a safety plan during construction of the project . (C) It was operated by the County of Orange until 1959 and has been closed ever since . (D) There will be no enclosed structures constructed on the parking lot . 6 . CIWMB Comment : What is the distance ( in feet) between the library and the landfill boundary? Also , please indicate the location of the landfill in the map . If the distance is within a thousand feet , there is a likelihood of landfill gas migration to the library. Response: The library is located approximately 500 feet from the landfill boundary. As previously discussed, methane study has been prepared to assess the possible methane impacts . The proposed parking lot construction will be implementing all mitigation measures to minimize the potential methane related hazards . 7 . CIWMB Comment : If construction has to occur on top of the landfill , what mitigation measures will be taken for possible creation of odor, landfill gas , vectors and litter? Also, if leachate is discovered during construction, what mitigation measures will be implemented? Response: Although refuse is. present under a small portion of the proposed lot , the Department of Public Works has indicated that if the project is approved, a ventilation system will be installed under the entire lot . Since the protrusion of the landfill that extends .under Talbert is narrow and lies so far beneath the street, it doesn ' t appear that grading operations will come into contact with refuse and/or leachate . If leachate is discovered during construction, the Public Works Department will halt the project, bring in a consultant to develop a mitigation plan before construction is allowed to continue . ( 1314D) f- �'J a CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINCTON BEACH - To Howard Zelefski From Robert Eichblatt Planning Director City Engineer Subject LIBRARY PARKING EXPANSION — Date August 22, 1991 LANDFILL/TALBERT DELETION The Problem: Geotechnical studies have proved that the adjacent abandoned landfill south of Talbert intrudes into and under the Talbert right—of—way at least as far as the southerly edge of pavement — for the entire length of the library frontage. In fact, at the low point along Talbert, the-landfill extends well beyond the northerly edge of pavement. The borings indicate that the refuse mass in certain locations is as much as 20 feet thick, with the bottom of the mass being as deep as 38 feet below the surface. To compound the problem, at the low point along Talbert, the refuse mass sits on top of a thick layer o peat. These studies explain the reason why this reach of Talbert, over the years, has experienced extensive differential settlement. The continual maintenance effort required has, by no means, been cost—effective, considering the low traffic volumes. If Talbert were widened to secondary arterial standards and the dip taken out, any additional traffic generated by the improvements would further accelerate the settlement and resultant maintenance costs. Our Geotechnical consultant, therefore, recommended that Talbert be reduced to merely, an access to the library. Possible Solutions 1. Revised structural sections including such things as cement or lime—treated bases The problem is so deep and extensive that such treatments would only delay the continuation of the settlement. 2. Remove the refuse and peat — Since these materials are considered toxic and the depths of the removal are as great as 38 feet, the cost of removal would be considerable and the associated permit process as long as two years. 3. Build a bridge over the landfill — The bridge would be 600 to 800 feet long and might hurt access to the library. The bridge piers would have to run completely through the refuse mass and possibly the peat. This would also necessitate a solid waste mitigation plan and the same two year permit process. The cost of such an undertaking would be prohibitive Traffic Issues Our Traffic Engineering staff has studied the issue. Their findings are as follows: 1. Daily trips on this reach of Talbert are minimal and consisting predominantly of library customers. 2. If Talbert were effectively closed to through traffic, those trips could easily be accommodated by Slater, Ellis, Golden West and Gothard. They will be further accommodated by the upcoming widenings on Golden West, Ellis and Gothard. Library Parking Exp. Landfill/Talbert Deletion August 22, 1991 Page 2 3. Several years ago, the City Council removed Talbert, between Golden West and Edwards, from the Circulation Element. This prevented the possibility of future arterial — level traffic volumes. 4. Therefore, considering only traffic volumes, the library section of Talbert is not necessary for through movements. Public Safety Issues The Fire Department objected to complete closure of this section of Talbert because of their response grid. The latest version of the parking layout allows for the response movement, while discouraging the motoring public from driving through. Fire response will also be augmented with the installation of opticom devices on signals along Ellis. County Concurrence K I have learned that staff has received notice from the County of Orange EMA staff that they are in support of the elimination of Talbert Avenue as an arterial highway. This support includes also the stretch between Golden West and Edwards in conformance with the action of our City Council several years ago. The EMA staff will make a recommendation to the County Board of Supervisors to delete those reaches of Talbert from the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, pending receipt of our Geotechnical Report and a City Council Resolution requesting the deletion. REE:dw 3034g4&5 1991 Dent. of Comm. Development TO: Planning Commission FROM: Environmental Review Board DATE: September 26 , 1991 SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment 91-36 This Assessment involves a request by the City of Huntington Beach to delete a portion of Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Gothard'. Street as an arterial on the City ' s Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways to allow for development of a parking lot in conjunction with the Huntington Beach Central Library expansion project. City Staff reviewed the environmental assessment form and determined that a negative declaration could be filed for the project . The assessment was given to the Environmental Review Board for review. A subcommittee of the Board has reviewed the assessment and with the endorsement of .the full Board recommends that more information be developed concerning Items 1 (a) and (g) , specifically the suitability of the former landfill area south of Talbert which is proposed for development as a parking lot. For example, Staff reports in relevant part as follows : "Kleinfelder, Inc. has prepared a geotechnical report which analyzes the suitability of the project site for development of the proposed parking lot. The study found a deep layer of organic material which may result in surficial settlement over the long-term due to decomposition. . .However, the study indicates that analysis of organic materials do not reveal highly active decomposition rates . The report concluded that the parking lot could be developed as proposed using surficial grading to improve site characteristics . Although most of the parking areas are proposed to be located north of Talbert Avenue, some of the areas are proposed for the south side of Talbert and may be located over the landfill . The study discussed above did not analyze areas south of Talbert; therefore, suitability of soils south of Talbert for parking lot development is not known. However, with implementation of mitigation measures (sic) no. 3 contained below, no significant impacts are anticipated. " September 26 , 1991 Page 2 Mitigation measure no. 3 provides, "Prior to issuance of grading permits, a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer for proposed parking areas located on the south side of Talbert. This analysis shall include on- site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, soil corrosivity; fill properties , foundations, retaining walls , streets, and utilities . " The Board believes that given the potential for methane gas leakage and explosion, questions concerning the suitability of the former landfill area south of Talbert for development as a parking lot should be answered before the Planning Commission grants approval of the project . The Board also recommends clarification of the discussion in response to Item 13 (b) . Item 13 (b) says that the project may have an impact on existing parking facilities . The discussion says in relevant part that, "The City of Huntington Beach zoning code does not contain any specific parking standards for libraries . Staff has analyzed the parking required to serve the library expansion. . . a total of 705 spaces will be required to serve the expansion. The proposed plan shows 705 spaces . No significant adverse parking impacts are anticipated. " The Board wonders whether Staff might find library parking requirements in a source other than the City ' s zoning code. For example, in the County Building Code, or in another source addressing the parking needs of public buildings in general . Also, the Board recommends clarification by Staff of the issue of the 705 parking spaces shown by the plan. Are these 705 additional spaces that don ' t exist today, or is this the number of spaces presently existing? Finally, in response to Item 4 , which concerns the landscaping of the parking lot areas, the Board recommends that the City utilize drought resistant plants . ATTACHWENT NO. NZ state of California Environmental Protection Agency Memorandum To Tom Loftus Date: October 7 , 1991 State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Julie Osugi City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Prom George H. Larson, 6Manager Waste Generation Analysis and Environmental Assessment California Integrated Waste Management Board Subject: SCH #91091026 , Negative Declaration (ND) , No. 91-36 , to amend the Circulation Element of the City of Huntington Beach General Plan by deleting Talbert Avenue (Between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets) from the City ' s Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways, Orange County. California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) staff have reviewed the Negative Declaration for the document cited above and offer the following comments: In consideration of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) section 15205 (c) CIWMB staff will focus comments on specific issues involving waste generation and disposal . In order to help decision-makers 1) identify potential impacts from construction and demolition projects, 2) determine whether any such impacts are significant, and 3) ascertain whether significant impacts can be mitigated to a level of insignificance, CIWMB staff request that the final ND include the following information: A) . Since mitigated measures are included in the document, the title of this document should be changed to "Mitigated Negative Declaration" . B. ) Identification of the final disposal site (s) for the project ' s anticipated waste generation. 1 . Page 2 C. ) Identification of the anticipated types and quantities of solid wastes to be generated upon implementation of the plan; both during construction phases and at the project completion. D. ) Identification of the potential impacts of these quantities on remaining landfill capacities and the calculated site-life associated thereof. The construction of new parking facilities may increase the generation of waste being sent to landfills. To minimize the amount of solid waste going into landfills, staff recommends that the following measures be considered in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) : A. ) Implementation of a recycling program at any parking facilities. B. ) Promote the use of products made of recycled materials (e. g. , asphalt, inerts) in the construction of structures for the project. C. ) Promote the inclusion of waste collection storage areas such as drop off bins into the design of the project. Other comments : A) . Page 2 , Discussion on items (a) & (g) The MND stated that the southern edge of Talbert Avenue is bounded by the Huntington Beach Landfill . It is also stated that other proposed parking areas will be located on the south side of Talbert Avenue and may be located over the landfill . While it is true that Klienfelder, Inc. has prepared a geotechnical report which analyzes the suitability of the project site for development of the proposed parking lot, there was no mention in the study of possible exposure of construction. workers to landfill gas and how it will be mitigated, as a result of disruptions, displacements and compaction of soil materials . B) . Because of the potential impact to the public health and safety, what precautionary measures will be taken? Would there be a Health and Safety Plan developed? C) . Is the Huntington Beach Landfill active or closed? D) . Would there be an enclosed structure (i . e, guard house) in the proposed parking facility? If so, please indicate in the map. Page 3 4 . What is the distance (in feet) between the library and the landfill boundary? Also, please indicate the location of the landfill in the map. If the distance is within a thousand feet, there is a likelihood of landfill gas migration to the library. 5 . If construction has to occur on top of the landfill , what mitigation measures will be taken for possible creation of odor, landfill gas, vectors and litter? Also, if leachate is discovered during construction, what mitigation measures will be implemented? Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the City of Huntington Beach Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways . If you have any questions regarding these comments, please call Leandro Ramos at (916) 327-0452 . r ATTACHMENT NO, 9 ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS FOR DENIAL CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 91-1/ CENTRAL LIBRARY MASTER PLAN FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 91-1: 1 . Deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets will result in substantial future impacts to surrounding arterials and the ability of the Circulation System to serve the Central Library area . 2 . Deletion of Talbert Avenue, between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, will impact the future provision of emergency vehicle response to the Central Library area by deleting an access route between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets. 3 . Deletion of Talbert, between Goldenwest and Gothard Streets, is inconsistent with Circulation Element policies for the development of a system of arterial streets and highways that ensures that safe and efficient movement of people and goods . FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CENTRAL LIBRARY PARKING MASTER PLAN: 1 . The Central Library Master Plan does not comply with compact ` parking provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . 2 . The Central library Parking Plan will encroach onto existing park area and will result in the loss of approximately 1 . 1 acres of vegetation. 3 . The Central Library Parking Plan will allow for public parking in the vicinity of a landfill and will result in maintenance costs to repair damage due to periodic settling . 4 . The Central Library Parking Plan will allow for public parking in the vicinity of a methane hazard area . (1275d-14) .,ity ui rlunungton BeachpR-rGUT _ '- 3.tic� :� v Office of the City Clerk p a tz NOV22 91 z `'-'r'.`h• `� P.O.Box 190 FIRST CLASS � H Huntington Beach,CA 92648 _--•�•�----- .... CAI-� :.._,� , 1 ,` ,. . U'iJ72 � 165-401-24 I ' Leonard, Jeff 16651 Gemini Lane Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 TING Tp4, O ,MC°PPOR.I/FC C y LEONE351 92b471429 1A90 11/25.j 91 F13RWARCIING TIME EXPIRED_ LELlNARWYEFF .. -�' '� 17832 EDTHARD ST - 9y -f HUNTINGTON ,BEACH MCA 92647-b217 RETURN TO SENDER �paNTY ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ------------ Connie Brockway,City Clerk ..,.., ,,.. .._ ..<>•,..: .............a..._... . .. i:- �- .._. .,,..... .. .. � ._\=3� City of Huntington Beach PRESORT d a (� rc3 t_�•-� t �1 i7 Office of the City Clerk F�i �� CLASS ��c A��t a NOV 22 91 P.O.Box 190 t� C 3 J i 5. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 . - .��,. �_N �A 159-302-02 Johann Assigal frL ftivaus"'D C/o Hans Lamports —f T Rye 172552 Talbert Ave.NTINGHuntington Beach, CA �say '��.__ R7 CP C- COUNTY P� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING �,�,��,,,�„11„',,,fill Connie Brockway,City Clerk _.:,._.. a......,..- 6.i:U City of Huntington Beach �'��t:s �f �zA\,, rJ a9 C,:It�, :�` u.S�us,rc� =• Office of the City Clerk �'.' �_ , _ " '�= P.O. Box 190 ` � � NOV2�' d `` 91 -.. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 -��-ti•-a.� W f" C l �.litj J1 �.� lee.�-� 959."291—01 Las zlo'I'46vac.s' ':/;•. 7 4645 E. Pacificm oast-1 , NTINGT Long Beach, CA 90804 0—`MGORY044/10 Fiz.il I�QI r �C `fQ��1;09. �� NOV ?� o LEGAL — PUBLIC HEARING f1,1�11IJ�L�fU.ddt�.dd�6dsldl��IdJ6�dIla �6W.,�iJ�,u4fl RPd If Connie Brockway,City Clerk y . City of Huntington Beach gt e, ��- Office of the City Clerk C gg r NOV22 P.O. Box 190 f'� ,r T f�'�=� ..P1 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 (_�,< <;�_. I 165-251-57 G Ocean Front Company 10480 Talbert Ave. TING Tpy Fountain Valley, CA 92708 O ORP0441FO EICEA480R41ARDING1TIglago /es/91 I3CEAN FRONT CQ 9 1 LIGHTHOUSE LN 9 FOUNTAIN SA 9270 _W19 C• c��NTY �P` LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk %��'> I;,.: ` i= e + ; 0 =?ll.oJFilCif.(iil' City of Huntington Beach i y Office of the City Clerk r NOV2 91 �� P.O. Box 190 ST C L At S S F,141 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 """`.... .�•--.....�.,....., l %i- 5-4 1- ` '• 'R— o 174 %e o e•off Monteerey0� 90' 44 TING Tpy �6`_`NCOXPAAA/Fo v�A� �paNtY Via` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 11,IIII,II,I lilt ,l„Ills„L,I,I,LI1,,,,,1,1,1„Il Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach pi J9', Office of the City ClerkP.O. Box 190FIRT tqNov Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ,,,,, 165-261-63 ET(UJ lHuntington Donald Westerdale 3352 Count Cir. �/ 1 �NTINGjp Beach, CA 92649 `NCOXY084/ (,I! NUgS&q A 'sr O@ cppN T Y cps LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 1+�11;Illjpll�l;;�l,rpp,111;,tf,15y�,rl ;,"je CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK November 6, 1991 James Bent 16552 Graham Place Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Dear Mr. Bent: The City Council on November 4, 1991, approved_ the applicants request for a continuance of the public hearing to January 6, 1992. for your information the enclosed letter from Mrs. Austin was introduced- into- the record. Please call if you require further information. Sincerely, Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk CB:pm Enclosure (Telephone:714536-5227) L, ot& CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH VIJ2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK November 6,_ 1991 Haim Katzir Chabad of West Orange County 5702 Clark Drive, Suite 18 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Dear Rabbi : The City Council on November 4, 1991, approved your request for continuance of the public hearing on Conditional Use Permit 91-11. The City. Council continued the hearing to January 6, 1992. I have enclosed for your information a communication from Virginia Austin which was introduced at the public hearing. Please call the Community Development Department or my office for any assistance you may request. S.i ncerely_,- Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk CB:pm Enclosure (Telephone:714-536-5227) • VIRGINIA Y. AUSTIN 5451 Heil Avenue Huntington Beach CA 92649 'r`E;vEa (714) 846-4683 - ;L F u! f; n: t November 4, 1991 Huntington Beach City Council Huntington Beach Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Dear Honorable Council Members: RE: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-11 This letter has been written with due sincerity in hopes that the Council' will, reconsider its previous decision regarding the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11. I had previously spoke out in opposition to this matter. I only regret that I have a previous obligation before this one which is why I have taken the time to write this letter in case I don't get there in time to speak out again. Hopefully, I will make it to the appeal in time to hear some of it. I, the undersigned, live directly across from the property involved. There are numerous reasons why I wish to see this land either remain as R1 (single family residential)- as classified or be left as_ it is with only the nursery,/daycare center. I have taken the time to categorize my objections as follows: SAFETY:. Heil and Graham is an extremely busy intersection and almost impossible to get across not only as a pedestrian, jogger-, or bicyclist (bike lane located here), but as... a driver of a vehicle as well. I have witnessed several accidents and many people who do not stop for the stop sign nor the pedestrians. There are no sidewalks on Graham or Heil on the side of the street where this. lot in question- is located. I feel• that it would be extremely hazardous to the church members who walk to church on their special days when they don't drive. I have also seen many Jaywalkers near the Mormon church who are trying to get to their cars that have been parked- in front of my neighbors' homes down the street (west) from me. It would also increase the number of vehicles coming and going here when they do drive. We see a lot of traffic commuting to Douglas, Marina High School, the industrial area, etc., between 6:00-9:00 a.m, and 3:30-6:30 p.m. In fact, my front door is really the alley, as there is not parking in front of my house due to a bike line. You can imagine the trouble I have trying to get out of the alley onto Graham--nobody wants to let you out or in!! NOISE FACTOR: All day and night I hear the screeching of tires as the cars go flying on these streets. Numerous times I think I'm at the Indianapolis 500 cause it sounds like a race track. By permitting the church to congregate at this location would only add to the amount of disturbances present. It would also increase the hours of noise as it is • ` Huntington Beach Council Members RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-NO. 91-11 November 4, 1991 Page 2 of 2 only natural that when people get together for meetings they usually linger around in the parking lots talking, laughing, etc., not being aware of how much their voices carry. My husband goes to bed between 7:30-8:30 p.m. because he has to get up early to go to work. I fear that if this permit is granted, the noise after their meetings will cause problems. Especially, since they first stated that their meetings would end at 9:00 p.m, and then at the second meeting they tried to slip in midnight as the finishing time. What guarantee do we have that they will adhere to the hours set by the permit and how much hassle is it going to be for us to have any discrepancies taken care of regarding their changing the_hours. PARKING: On numerous occasions, the overflow of cars that should be parking in the Mormon parking lot are parked along Graham as there isn't enough parking in their lots. We have some of them who speed through the alley so they can get on Del Mar to cross Heil and be on the right side of the street where it's easier for them to access the parking lot. This creates a hazard to us when we try to back out of our driveways. MEADOWLARK DEVELOPMENT: With the upcoming development of the Meadowlark area, I honestly feel the congestion at Heil and Graham will take its tall and be ultimately unbearable at the completion of Meadowlark. Thus, to add a church at this location will only increase the foreseen pedestrian/vehicular traffic here. FLOODING: With the slightest amount of rainfall, this intersection falls victim to flooding_as I am sure you are aware. This flooding adds to the dangers of this intersection on the same side as the above-mentioned property- and should be taken into consideration when deliberating. on- this matter. COMMENTS: It seems that maybe the church could-get together with the Meadowlark developers- and build something in that area in a more appropriate location that adds_ to the safety of their congregation and all concerned: Surely, there should be some zoning that qualifies them to build-there. I have nothing against the church. I just don't want to see that piece of property- eventually end up like all the other corners -- donut shops, beauty salons, cleaners, video stores, etc. We have enough of them- in this area. WHEREFORE, I, Virginia Austin, pray to the Huntington Beach City--Council members that you will take into consideration some, if not all, of my objections to the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11. The outcome of this appeal lies in- your hands, and I sincerely. believe that you perform this appeal in a professional, unbiased-manner. Thank you for allowing me to present my side of the issue. Have a nice day!! Respectfully yours, Virginia Y. Austin VIRGINIA.Y.-AUSTIN 6121,7 , fo 5451 Heil Avenue ftECE1..,E0 Huntington Beach, CA 92649', c�TY CLfzK y�o,�/o (714)' 846-4683 51 6 November 4, 1991 tea- J Huntington Beach City Council Huntington Beach Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Dear Honorable Council Members: RE: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-11 This letter has been written with due sincerity in hopes that the Council will reconsider its previous decision regarding the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11. I had previously spoke out in opposition to this matter. I only regret that I have a previous obligation before this one which is why I have taken the time to write this letter in case I don't get there in time to speak out again. Hopefully,I will make it to the appeal in time to hear some of it. I, the undersigned, live directly across from the property involved. There are numerous reasons why I wish to see this land either remain as R1 (single family residential) as classified or be left as it is with only the nursery/daycare center. I have taken the time to categorize my objections as follows: AFETY: Heil and Graham is an extremely busy intersection and almost impossible to get across not only as a pedestrian, jogger, or bicyclist (bike lane located here), but as a driver of a vehicle as well. I have witnessed several accidents and many people who do not stop for the stop sign nor the .pedestrians. There are no sidewalks on Graham or Heil on the side of the street where this lot in question is located. I feel that it would be extremely hazardous to the church members who walk to church on their special days when they don't drive. I have also seen many Jaywalkers near the Mormon church who are trying to get to their cars that, have been parked in front of my neighbors' homes down the street (west) from me.. It would also increase the number of vehicles coming and going here when they do drive. We see a lot of traffic commuting to Douglas, Marina High School, the industrial area, etc., between 6:00-9:00 a-m, and 3:30-6:30 p.m. In fact, my front door is really the alley as there is not parking in front of my house due to a bike line. You can -imagine the trouble I have trying to get out of the alley onto Graham--nobody wants to let you out or in!! NOISE FACTOR: All day and night I hear the screeching of tires as the cars go flying on these streets. Numerous times I think I'm at the Indianapolis 500 cause it sounds like a race track. By permitting the church to congregate at this location would only add to the amount of disturbances present. It would also increase the hours of noise as it is Huntington Beach Council Members RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 91-11 November 4, 1991 -Page 2 of 2 only natural that when people get together for meetings they usually linger around in the parking lots talking, laughing, etc., not being aware of how much their voices carry. My husband goes to bed between 7:30-8:30 p.m. because he has to get up early to go to work. I fear that if this permit is granted, the noise after their meetings will cause problems. Especially, since they first stated that their meetings would end at 9:00 p.m, and then at the second meeting they tried to slip in midnight as the finishing time. What guarantee do we have that they will adhere to the hours set by the permit and how much hassle is it going to be for us to have any discrepancies taken care of regarding their changing the hours. PARKING: On numerous occasions, the overflow of cars that should be parking in the Mormon parking lot are parked along Graham as there isn't enough parking in their lots. We have some of them who speed through the alley so they can get on Del Mar to cross Heil and be on the right side of the street where it's easier for them to access the parking lot. This creates a hazard to us when we try to back out of our driveways. MEADOWIARK DEVELOPMENT: With the upcoming development of the Meadowlark area, I honestly feel the congestion at Heil and Graham will take its toll and be ultimately unbearable at the completion of;Meadowlark. Thus, to add a church at this location will only increase the foreseen pedestrian/vehicular traffic here. FLOODING: With the slightest amount of rainfall, this intersection falls victim to flooding as I am sure you are aware. This flooding adds to the dangers of this intersection on the same side as the above-mentioned property and should be taken into consideration when deliberating on this matter. COMMENTS: It seems that maybe the church could get together with the Meadowlark developers and build something in that area!in a more appropriate location that adds to the safety of their congregation and all concerned. Surely, there should be some zoning that qualifies them to build there. I have nothing against the church. I just don't want to see that piece of property eventually end up like all the other corners -- donut shops, beauty salons, cleaners, video stores, etc. We have enough of them in this area. WHEREFORE, 1, Virginia Austin, pray to the Huntington Beach City Council members that you will take into consideration some;:if not..:all, of my objections to the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11. The-.outcome of this appeal lies in your hands, and I sincerely believe that you perform this appeal in. a.professional, unbiased manner. Thank you for allowing me to present my side of the issue. Have a nice day!! Respectfully yours, Virginia Y. Austin 41 je CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK January 9, 1992 Rabbi Aron David Berkowitz Chabad of West Orange County 5702 Clark Drive, #18 Huntington Beach, CA 92749 Dear Rabbi Berkowitz: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, January 6, 1992 accepted your letter of withddrawal of your Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 application. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at 536-5227. I wish your congregation the very best in securing a location very soon. Sincerely yours, Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk CB:me 1051 K (Telephone:71 a-536.5227► . ...._................... To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman andr°� (p O The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners „Tf s ti We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . Name Address ,/ , sign: --�� — S3 ( �! 67 L ,14 Print: Ll�v�io� b-��11 Cit zi pZ� .k- Sign: !;3gl 4t? L Print: City ? zip Sign: 391 E1,4 Print: city zi p�f Sign: 53L Print: city zip 7 sign: . Print: rt) -City Zip ��1�•�j Sign: 5 75- Print: \ ��( Nt?� City f} zip9Z6 el 4 3 Sign: Sl h�67 c. Print: City N• /3 Zip g Z6 �J Sign: Print: � ' (...• �_�x_ City d 13 Zip SU v 2 Sign: �-�- �rz-A, S /)V(-, '0 Print: i ("."15Lt.O City // �, I Zip alp 4 Sign: _ S-3 1 h`L`7L Print: lcc �]_ �}�,p City6 Zip / ' Sign: �� ` ✓ �r'`''' s'3 i� .`�]:�. , City ,Print: NJ Zip Y �4 Sign: Print: - City 14/ zip9 2 Sign: S -3 0 Print: W:P L--4*A\)I City W> ZipF?Lffj / To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . Name Address , Sign: // ze ` 6�5-0 / 1L)E'� L Print: Npl2.L(I& iuJ city zip 9Z�o51� sign: Print: I�JCr- �� City /}!lj zip921P(J Sign: j Print City j zipAIza F4T sign: . ' Print: pJ� City 7T� Zip Sign: _ SZl Print: V ' Cit zi P Z Sign: - r7 O `L. Print: rj4IMr,,V city Zip 07 2-/6 Sign: U /�� -.5sy 'Ot7 L Print: City zip / Z(p Y C, Sign: �SL� Print: e 'A-fzz(—c City ? zip Sign: Print: City zip 07 2,6g Sign: G2 s��,tv SF 5SS 1 en 4- Print: ,t1GEXANMr City Zip C7Z(0 Sign: J - 5Z fJE7 L Print: City H-6 zip 9 z4,gs Sign: lT C-7 L Print: City 4'1 zip Sign: Print: City zip To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil- and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . Nam Address + I / l Sign: s P I �� 'ri r l.lJ Print: City zip �,;U Sign: 1� ti tl 61 R..p.L,A w. Print: City Fl • Ps Zip Sign: _�i�i.✓ y /may u�, =57-- Print City Zip f Ar 3 3 2- �-/�t.�o Sign: .� /7 IN Print: /Q, 440 City I�A" Ma i p g Zb sign: Print: I _ City Zip !�jzfjac5 Sign: / 024yYz &oe4MA•. �..t Print: City 44,t, Zip 9.-2GqqC sign: .'y�j - ��J�S !&_(� (r�r Print: City (� Zip�j) �T,s Sign: lr IlcS Zl &ilP,,n�w. LT Print: City O-Z Zip q7_6 4� Sign: I Lr 2&ARAM PLArj�; Print: City U .�. Zip9 1049 Sign: /6 .-S2 Print: # . P.v City 14 l2 Zip Sign: Al2dr,A Y S � 2, Print: 6 E City �J` fJ r Zip oZ Sign: QW4A I 9D� AgAu A4)N Print: Qp t� City /46 Zip 916 Sign: MOW TMIR Cry S� Print: 1 '� S City Zip To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil- and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . Name/ Address Sign: f 5_' 7 Print: Xkz S i Y City Zip Sign• Print: +¢�� AES�/E�Z. city zip 9 26, 5 Sign: 5 S L �i- Print: City /`�"!7 zip- 95«J Sign: 5 Z)�� #& 7 L Print: City Zip Sign: 92,,nn(2 . 5431 4r ? L, - Print: A City Nej Zip Sign: �I� �/t;/-s� 5431 p tl'� G Print: :� �JL�� City Zip Sign: SyZ 4iE7I-- �— t Print: �/�i'✓ru� C ��iir City /7�, ' / zip Sign:-l/h4_IVA/9 Print: . - �1(; City Zip Sign: 5Y Z Print: City zip Cf 76 Sign: Print: Cit/y� Zip Sign: Print: Cit�y/ r7/5 Zip Sign: 5�0 E7 L Print: NIA 11 City Zip Sign: �ILT ,�yd 1 E7 L Print: /�/pIII&6_3 Or -o-rr City Zip I To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who' live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . I Name Address , r Sign: Print: Sign: Print: sign: Print: City ZipOz G L/ , Sign: S -/ .� /7 L Print: City 6 A Zip Sign: L SAD lVi�2L Print: City Zip Sign: s'6y Print City Zip Sign: Print: ShaYo n �- �cc} City Zip Sign: 11E7C. Print: City Zip 41 ZIkO Sign: 0 5& 6? L Print: City zipg z Sign: L Print: City n7 3 Zip 1� 7& Cj OV Sign: / -!D 6 6 / ,.8tzC, Print 7 City P Zip 1.26 V- Sign: Print: •\ City zip Z (D 9 Sign: Print: City Zip To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil- and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . Name Address Sign: Print: �►9�'MQS t�1V l�A- City Zip CJ Z�pj Print: ,U / City /• Zip rjZ(o��i sign: Print: City A05 Zip -46 `f' 17 Sign: /go L-I(J Print: - '� Ut City Alit Zip Sign: S Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own Rl property in the vicinity of the Heil and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . 4N e Address / , Sign: � 5591 f- � C Print: City Zipq26 Sign: S 2S,, ]'7" �- Print: G O h City zip �I Sign: Oki Print: �! .,T,.� L,Aaf-C 1 City .Zip Sign: Print: �j�'�.r,.�? %� ti4; "�;.4:1;'� �' City ter•,^. Zip FZ&Yr Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11. Name Address Sign: LUN Print: W L-C City - 7' Zip Sign: 546Z dv 6C 7-t Print: /or�/�c� Q �� oY1 City T7 /3 Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip 7-Cep CHABAD OF WEST ORANGE COUNTY 5702 Clark Drive,Suite 18 • Huntington Beach,Czfforrtia 92649 0 C714)84-M5BOARD OF nMECrORS January 6,1992 _ ={ DIRECTOR-RABBI Attn: Connie Brockway Aron David 3erk.owtz City Clerk -'m c,rn - n^r C PROSID0 T Honorable Mayor and City Council , ' Haim KWZir VICE PRESIDENTS Map 6-meam Please be informed that for various reasons we are with- carol Geller drawing our application for the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11. Menebersb>� Florence Kaplan We will thus not be attending the hearing tonight. i Faciuly Iarry'c'chau" Sincerely, Gcvr,sryr4"r 8elatioaa m GW Rabbi Aron avid Berkowitz SECRETARY,ntFrSSL1RFR Director - Rabbi Ken Goldblau ADB/mb PAST PRESIDENTS Harry Taba hnick, Esq. Reudor Grxch 'Tagetber We Maize It HappenI ff BuUdtng Campaign .1_9.9D CHABACXUBAVr7UI- 7be largest nea rk of religious and social sen4ca on the weft Coast 01—Oc-92 12:-'7F,14 Flo FILE GUIDE - Please file this document in: �^ .Category: Label : r /roQ� Established file New file - see U Other: 0846I i �. --- ��s. � o NEW IT11 0> 0 1TI E p -n Z 0 "STATE OF CALIFORNIA El County of Orange Z $[ 0 r 1 am a Citizen of the United States and a mZ resident of the County aforesaid; I am over they age of eighteen years, and not a party to or 8 iial no interested in the below entitled matter. I am a ❑ principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH A x o m INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general �9 o, D m circulation, printed and published in the City of ElF' m Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of :E °Q Califomia,and that attached Notice is a true and Punic NOTICE Z o I complete copy as was printed and published In NOTICE OF; j ❑ F m PUBLIC HEARING - the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley APPEAL issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s)of: PLANNING T tAi COMMISSIONS APPROVAL OF,` n CONDITIONAL USE�, ❑ , 3 PER NO October 17, 1991 aiiv _ (ESTABLISH HURCH WITN 6INT USE PARKING) -NOTICE 1S`;.' HEREBY GIVEN that the-Huntington Beach- City Council"will hold a public hearing in the j Council., Chamber at the Huntington Beach 'Civic Center, 2000 Main Street; Huntington-Beach, Califor-nia, on the date and at the time indicated below.;to.re- ceive and ..considers: the statements of;-all person who wish to be-heard rela-. live to the-application,,dew 1 scribed;below. N;P�UBL_LCaNO�TICES ems. DATE/T,IME:,Monday; No- vember 4;-- PM1 , N (2) Public Hearing;,(3) City APPLICATION NUMBER Council DiscussI and(4), Conditional Use Permit No. Qity Council Action t 91=11 '�` AJ ON FILE:=A copy of the QPPLI6ANT Haim .atzv/ .Proposed"request son fife. Rabbi Berkowitz + in the me Community Develop-, rit Department, 200-0 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the APPELLANT James A. Maio.-._ treet� :Huntington Bent Bea yh, .California =926d8, foregoing is true and correct. LOCATION: 5432 Heil for pection by th0pu'^' Ave. (Southwest corner of lic. Heil Ave.at Graham St) , ALL INTERESTED PER ZONE: R1 (Singlet Family (g fJctober 17 Residential N'.are irivited.to attend' Executed on • , 199 ) said hearing and expressi REQUEST: To permit the k opinions or submit evi- establishment of religious. Bence for or against the at Costa Mesa,California ;services, adult education ra'p�p�anon as< outluied I classes, and nursery/day= above Elf there are any fur= care facilities with joint use her;questions plea'sV;call, parking pursuant to Section HerbFauland -Assistant 9630(c) of the Huntington an"nerat`:536 5 71 . Beach Ordinance Code I<rC rile Brockway, Signature (( ENVIAONMENTAL,;.STA Huntington Beach`"bity i f PS! Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301, Clerk Class 1 'of the California Pubtislied.. Huntingt06 Environmental Qualify Act:- Beach/Fountain Valley In, COASTAL` STAT2 Not dependent October 17,j applicable 1991 PUBLIC HEARING 'PRO- 103-75'1 CEDURE: (1) Staff Report; PROOF OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING .r APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-11 (ESTABLISH CHURCH WITH JOINT USE PARKING) i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, November 4, 1991, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 APPLICANT: Haim Katzir/Rabbi Berkowitz APPELLANT: James A. Bent LOCATION: 5432 Heil Ave. (Southwest corner of Heil Ave. at Graham St. ) ZONE: R1 (Single Family Residential) REOUEST: To permit the establishment of religious services, adult education classes, and nursery/daycare facilities with joint use parking pursuant to Section 9630(c) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 of the California Environmental Quality Act. COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE: (1) Staff Report; (2) Public Hearing; (3) City Council Discussion; and (4) City Council Action. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,. Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the .application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway Huntington Beach City Clerk (1023d) 7 �CI3ABA� OF BEST ORANGE COUNTY 5702 Clark Drive, Suite 19+ Huntington Beams California 92649 + C714)846-2285 ._ ATT'N Mr. Herb Fauland ****** FAX (714) 374-1540 November 3, 1991 City Clerk / JQARD OF DIk&CTORF City Council Gj City of Huntigton Beach l DIRECTOR-RABBI 2000 Main Street L_ Aron David Berkowitz Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ! PRE=EN7 Haim K=ir SUBJECT CODZTIONAL USE PERMIT No. 91-11 VtCEPRESIDENT5 This will serve as-a for-mai request for continuance wos6zNam in our CUP application and its appeal process Carat Geller Msntbprsbfp An appeal hearing date was schedule for Monday, FbrenceKa!plan November 4th, 1991 . Due to various legal matters please allow for 60 days continuance or the earliest Fac44yopowions available date thereafter L2ny Tichauer Community Relatim Abraham Gill Respectfully yo SECRFTARY/PREASURER ' Ken Goldblau Haim Katzir T T r � r Yn PAST PRESIALINTS c c' —1 Rarry Tsbachn*Esq. Reudor Gmtch "Together We Make It Happen?" X;t Building Cgmpaign 1990 CR4BAD1WBA M01- ne largest nettuork of religious and social sen4ces on the west Coast ********************************************** DATAQTJICK INFORMATION NETWORK REPORT * * * Orange ********************************************** Prepared for: L MARTIN PROPERTIES LARRY T. Provided by: GUARDIAN TITLE Sales Rep MARY L. 2200 W. ORANGEWOOD Prepared by: CORALEIGH HOPKINS ORANGE, CALIF . 92668 ******************************************************************************** * Labels - 3 up copiable records 1 to 44 * * * --- Search Criteria --- Parcel Number 14605501 OR 14605511 . . 14605512 OR 14606214 . . 14606230 OR 146* * 05506 . . 14605507 OR 14615540. . 14615542 OR 14621102 . . 14623.1.07* * OR 14621111 . . 14621113 OR 14621116 OR 14635109 . . 14635113 OR* * 14635204 . . 146353 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 44 matching properties were found The following report was processed using the above parameters and was provided by MARY L. of GUARDIAN TITLE CORALEIGH HOPKINS Lead Customer Service Representative I I GUARDIAN TITLE COMPANY 2200 W.Orangewood j Suite 230 Orange,CA 92668 Office Customer Service (714)776-4900 • (714)385-1344 I4li • Z.1I.oz. CAvt4m or r4o. pore► Uj ob FL 5d'•561S 5 E. Now^+lv,- p lC yr. S .T 1,As C:rt , vT. 94150 xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx 1.46--( 55-01. 1.46--0 }--(_1(.-_. 1 46-( 55-0 7 Harold Jensen Smith RoY L_ Gibson Florian L_ Lek:avi h 5362 Cal iente Iir• 5302 Ca.l iente Dr 4872 Oahu Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, 1_.A 92649 Huntinstn Bch, CA 9264'-; 1.4_=.--i►`5-1 1 146-055-1 ' 146-062-14 Albert H Ward Robert W Kenyon Iaa.v:id Simon 5341 Heil Ave 5361 Heil Ave 16422 Hollywood Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 926 , 146-062-15 146-062-16 146-062-17 William W Wilson Anton J Kaufman Charles W Faulkner 5462 Ca.l i.ente Dr 5452 Cal i.ente Dr 5432 Cal iente Dr =�'-649 Huntinstn Bch, CA ':!2649 Huntinstn Bch, 1';A �..7•.-64') Huntinstn Bch, C:A . .._. . ,._ :1.46-062-P.-D 146-0(_-,',_-19 146-0(--2-2 1 Wallace H Be Mers Edward M Evans Martin L Hoffman 5422 Cal iente Dr 5412 Gal iente Dr- 5402 C:al iente Dr- Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, IAA 92649 Huntingtn Bch, CA 9264'"% 1.46-0 62-21 146-062-22 146-062 _ Mable M Webster Constance C Foster Est Of Robert N Nichols 5392 Cal i ente I_ir 5:=:82 Cal iente Dr 19805 Hanson Huntinstn Bch, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Lakeview, CA 92353 1.46--062--24 1.46-0C-2-'25 146-06 2-:,6. Thurman 6 Wade Howard . 1 & Kathryn Lott Carolyn M Mc Cl ure 5391. Heil Ave 5401. Heil Ave 5411 Heil Ave F`Ii.Jnt 1 noton Beach , CA 92649Huntington Beach, _A 92649 H. r t i ns tnr Reach, ,::,?:=, 1'-, i 1461062127 ��, 1,46-002--28 I j 146-062-•2 Daniel Joseph Koon I, Est Of Thelma L Stingley A Jer•r•y R & Virginia Austin 16411 Barnstable C:ir 'I. 1851 E First St :ate 00 5451 Heil Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92649 ii .Santa Ana, CA 92705 �' Huntington Beach, CA 92649 I ' 146-062-30 i I 146-155-40 146-155-41 Jerry T Abshier• Keith W Barnes Marina Vour•nazos F='. o, Box 2536 1 Heil Ave 1 5511 Heil Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntingtn Bch, CA 92649 Huntinetn Bch, CA 92649 146-155-42 14 ,—�11—�=�2 `7�'� �� 14r_,-211-03 Norman & Anne Cain i_r r Cif he F'r - _ ' rJing i hr 17 Cf Engin M Ur•alman r��i 1 Heil Ave 5� Nr t T ,P 1 3 5432 Heil Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92646 I L It akke .:it•,�, ut 84150 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 i 146-21 1-04 146-211—�6 146-21 1-07 Gary S Nak:ase David Ichinaga Dwane T & Maureen Funk: 16521 Graham St 16551 Graham :mot 16561 Graham St Huntingtn Bch,. CA 92649 Huntingtn Bch, CA 92649 Huntington Beach; CA 92649 146-211-11 i 146-211-12 146-211-13 _lames A & Monique Bent Kevin C: & Linea Kelter Robert E & Nancy Pruden Hunt !!T inGraham Pl 16562 Graham PI 16581 i raham 'mot gton Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146-211-16 146-351-09 1 146-351-10 Tr•uong & Hanh Le Xuan Nabil & Suzan Nasr•e Timothy Jordanides 9061 Bol sa Ave Ste 200a 19562 Dr•ybr•ooE, Ln 16271 Walrus Ln Westminster•, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146-351-11 146 1-13 146-352-04 Huti tonGlcnn W Jones pit, _ rn Bear- Thomas J Brett 1717 Crestview F' 0 No:>; 9i� : 5'-�i Venture Dr. Seal Beach, CA ►cs34�3 H►yr,tir,atr�r Beach, DA :tom .48 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146—52—�i5 146-352-06 146-35_,—i►1 John L Gardner Henry H & Mar,,, Woo Gerald R Winter•bur•n 4446 Westminster PI 13425 Lowell Cir• 4205 Cheshire Dr St Louis,mo 63108 Westminster•, CA 92683 Cypress, CA 90630 II �. 146-353-02 146-353-03 Herbert V Swanisan Austin C Jr Chiles i Harbor Bluffs C:i% t'113Z-A �i F 0 Box 208 �y 'r. Huntinoton Beach, CA 9264:7 Seal Beach, CA 90740 if 44 Pr•int'ed i It I - I a I _ w....��..✓._—.w-..-.w+..�d.r�+�.ar•wf�. �. - _....w-�..._.._ •- ..w..� „�_ ..r._v✓..:"`�i::��►.r..•r.•+..•��s_ _ --`._.er.✓...�..u:��-l..Y.. . •rIR:Tn�ts.�s.s.fnf.'T.F..etm.e!w`�+�wK�•rf Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach `D ;_� a 9l .°os�nc��: � ESORT 0 Office of the City Clerk ` OCT!7 91 = 1� -,`kwr P.O. Box,9U FIRST `LASS r��11 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ,�, cAL IV �r RE i E R-' 701572 . COX- �9�10 ING SF�O rFv David '_,irr ,r-� <,6 'p' TT O��NOp/ONE/�yB -I 1 � / iC-,422 H�� 1 ••,'wOC��:i Ave �• �� ' 9../ Hu r•1.1-i r7 q ,'1 r',.. Fl•c.,q;,,-�-._ 1'L Q _,'•;/_.A,-, in AQ h",� RlJ� JA � � ; IvXLEr I t,.� � o tiRETURN t F�►�.. COUNTY C�` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARIN L VIRGINIA Y. AUSTIN 5451 Heil Avenue Huntington Beach CA 92049 `DECEIVED r,!'iY CLERK (714) 846-4683 ;;±r v o r 57 ►' r November 4, 1991 Huntington Beach City Council Huntington Beach Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Dear Honorable Council Members: RE: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-11 This letter has been written with due sincerity in hopes that the Council will reconsider its previous decision regarding the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11. I had previously spoke out in opposition to this matter. I only regret that I have a previous obligation before this one which is why I have taken the time to write this letter in case I don't get there in time to speak out again. Hopefully, I will make it to the appeal in time to hear some of it. I, the undersigned, live directly across from the property involved. There are numerous reasons why I wish to see this land either remain as R1 (single family residential) as classified or be left as it is with only the nursery/daycare center. I have taken the time to categorize my objections as follows: SAFETY: Heil and Graham is an extremely busy intersection and almost impossible to get across not only as a pedestrian, jogger, or bicyclist (bike lane located here), but as a driver of a vehicle as well. I have witnessed several accidents and many people who do not stop for the stop sign nor the pedestrians.' _There are no sidewalks on Graham or Heil on the side of,the street where this lot in question is located. I feel that it would be extremely hazardous to the church members who walk to church on their special days when they don't drive. I have also seen many Jaywalkers near the Mormon church who are trying to get to their cars that have been parked in front of my neighbors' homes down the street (west) from me. It would also increase the number of vehicles coming and going here when they do drive. We see a lot of traffic commuting to Douglas, Marina High School, the industrial area, etc., between 6:00-9:00 a.m, and 3:30-6:30 p.m. In fact, my front door is really the alley as there is not parking in front of my house due to a bike line. You can imagine the trouble I have trying to get out of the alley onto Graham--nobody wants'to let you out or in!! NOISE FACTOR: All day and night I hear the screeching of tires as the cars go flying on these streets. Numerous times I think I'm at the Indianapolis 500 cause it sounds like a race track. By permitting the church to congregate at this location would only add to the amount of disturbances present. It would also increase the hours of noise as it is M ,1 Huntington Beach Council Members RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-11 November 4, 1991 Page 2 of 2 only natural that when people get together for meetings they usually linger around in the parking lots talking, laughing, etc., not being aware of how much their voices carry. My husband goes to bed between 7:30-8:30 p.m. because he has to get up early to,go to work. I fear that if this permit is granted, the noise after their meetings will cause problems. Especially, since they first stated that their meetings would end at 9:00 p.m, and then at the second meeting they tried .to slip in midnight as the finishing time. What guarantee do we have that they will adhere to the hours set by the permit and how much hassle is it going to be for us to have any discrepancies taken care of regarding their changing the hours. PARKING: On numerous occasions, the overflow of cars that should be parking in the Mormon parking lot are parked along Graham as there isn't enough parking in their lots. We have some of them who speed through-the alley so they can get on Del Mar to cross Heil and be on the right side of the street where it's easier for them to access the parking lot. This creates a hazard to us when we try to.back out of our driveways. MEADOWLARK DEVELOPMENT: With the upcoming development of the Meadowlark area, I honestly feel the congestion at Heil and Graham will take its toll and be ultimately unbearable at the completion of Meadowlark. Thus, to add a church at this location will only increase the foreseen pedestrian/vehicular traffic here. FLOODING: With the slightest amount of, rainfall, this intersection falls victim to flooding as I am sure you are aware. This flooding adds to the dangers of this intersection on the same side as the above-mentioned property and should be taken into consideration when deliberating on this matter. COMMENTS: It seems that maybe the church could get together with the Meadowlark developers and build something in that area in a more appropriate location that adds to the safety of their congregation and all: concerned. Surely, there should be some zoning that qualifies them to build there. I.-have nothing against the church. I just don't want to see that piece of property eventually end up like-all the other corners -- donut shops, beauty salons, cleaners, video stores, etc. We have enough of them in this area. WHEREFORE, I, Virginia Austin, pray to the Huntington Beach City Council members that you will take into consideration some, if not all, of my objections to the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11. The outcome of this appeal lies in your hands, and I sincerely believe that you perform this appeal in a professional, unbiased manner. Thank you for allowing me to present my side of the issue. Have a nice day!! Respectfully yours, Virginia Y. Austin REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION November 4, 1991 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Developme t Subject: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-11 Consistent with Council Policy? Vf Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE• Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by James A. Bent to the Planning Commission' s approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11, a request to permit the establishment of religious services, adult education classes and nursery/daycare facilities with joint use parking pursuant to Section 9630(c) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. RECOMMENDATION• Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Motion to: "Uphold the Planning Commission' s approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 with findings and suggested conditions of approval as outlined in Attachment No. 3 by denying the appeal" . Planning Commission Action on September 4 , 1991: A motion was made by Dettloff, second by Newman to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11, by the following vote: AYES: Newman, Shomaker, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon and Leipzig NOES: Richardson ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED PI O 5/85 ANALYSIS: Applicant ' s Request : The applicants, representing Chabad of West Orange County, are requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 to establish religious services, adult education classes and nursery/daycare facilities within an existing 2, 914 square foot nursery school building. A total of four (4) on-site parking spaces are provided for the existing school site. The existing nursery school building and use have been in operation since 1968, however, the current use will cease should the applicant' s request be approved. As proposed, the applicants are requesting establishment of the use for an initial period of five (5) years . No physical improvements to the building and/or public improvements to the site are proposed for the establishment of the temporary use. The public improvements have been determined by Planning Staff and Public Works not to be necessary at this time based upon the temporary nature of the use and the fact that no physical improvements to the site are proposed. The applicants will submit a new conditional use permit application at the end of the temporary five (5) year period to the use with full on-site and public improvements required to be in place. The applicants have submitted a conceptual site plan for the proposed use which indicates all public improvements, on-site parking, landscaping and a building envelope for the future church site. Joint Use Parking Pursuant to Section 9600.4 and Section 9606 . 1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code the applicants are requesting joint use of parking for the establishment of the proposed church facility. The off-site parking lot is located approximately 200 feet to the southwest of the proposed church facility. The applicant' s site currently is provided with four (4) on-site parking stalls and the joint use request is to utilize the adjacent church parking lot across Graham Place to the southwest to provide the remainder of the parking. A total of 51 spaces are required for the three (3) uses on site. Even though the total parking required for the uses on-site is 51 parking spaces, the applicants are requesting joint use of parking for their site based upon the divergent need of parking, days of operation and hours of operation. The joint use parking analysis indicates a maximum need of 34 parking spaces at any time for the applicant ' s proposed combination of hours and type of operation. RCA 11/4/91 -2- (1049d) In addition to the joint use of parking request for the establishment of the church, the applicants are requesting the off-site use of the existing church' s parking lot to the west. This is necessary because the applicant is only able to provide four (4) parking spaces on-site. Thirty (30) additional off-site spaces are; therefore, needed. The original establishment of the church to the west required a total of 201 parking spaces, however, a total of 286 parking spaces are provided for an excess of 85 parking spaces. The existing church has agreed to provide thirty (30) spaces at all times to the applicants for their joint use. The aforementioned joint use parking demand analysis indicates that at no time does the total parking demand exceed the total parking provided by the applicant and that no conflict regarding the availability of parking will occur. Analysis of Appeal The appellant Mr. James A. . Bent, cites the following concerns and reasons in appealing the Planning Commission' s approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11; 1) inadequate on-site parking, 2) increased automobile and pedestrian traffic, 3) hours of operation, 4) additional structures, and 5) applicant purchasing the property. A discussion of the appellant ' s concerns are outlined below: Inadequate On-site Parking: As analyzed in the attached September 4, 1991 Planning Commission Staff report, a joint use parking arrangement has been determined to adequately address the site' s insufficient parking. A total of 34 parking spaces are required to meet code requirements for the . church' s (Applicant) operation. The applicant ' s site provides four (4) on-site parking spaces and the remaining 30 spaces have been made up with a joint use parking agreement with the existing church to the west. Therefore, the parking requirements for the applicant ' s site have been satisfied. Increa ed Traffic: The appellant states that the existing street system (Heil Ave. and Graham Street) are inadequate to handle existing and potential traffic. In addition, the appellant states that many of the sidewalks in the area are also inadequate to handle the pedestrian traffic. Staff ' s analysis .focused on the impact a maximum 100 member congregation would have on parking and traffic. With respect to the latter the City' s Traffic Engineering Department belieives the impacts to be minimal based upon the small size of the church' s operation and the fact that the members walk to the Saturday service. The fact that pedestrian traffic to the site generally occurs only on Saturday indicates that the :lack of sidewalks on site will have a minimal impact. Staff and Public Works determined that _ no public improvements (sidewalks) were necessary at this time because of the temporary nature of the use. RCA 11/4/91 -3- (1049d) Hours of Operation: The appellant states that a discrepancy on hours of operation was indicated at the public hearing. As a condition of approval, the hours of operation have been fixed for the proposed uses applied for. No service or class is proposed to go beyond the hour of . 9 :30 PM. Additional Structures : The appellant cites a concern with regards to the possible placement of a trailer or some other temporary structure on-site. The proposal has been approved based upon the site plan submitted, and therefore any additional trailer or structure requires an amended Conditional Use Permit and the public hearing process . Property in Escrow: The appellant is concerned that the property is currently in escrow and; therefore should be required to put in the required public improvements . Planning staff does not generally concern itself with this issue (Escrow) unless authorization from the current property owner is. not granted. In this case all property owner authorizations have been granted. As noted earlier, the public improvements have been determined not to be necessary at this time based upon the temporary nature of the use. FUNDING SOURCE.: N/A ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may overturn the Planning Commission' s action of September 4, 1991 by approving the appeal and denying Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 with findings. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map 2 . Letter of appeal dated September 12, 1991 3 . Findings of Approval and suggested conditions of approval 4 . Planning Commission Staff report dated September 4, 1991 MTU:MA: lp RCA 11/4/91 -4- (1049d) RI U LJ RI 1/1 DP q„ ML•D R I RI MH ; ;RI RI RI = RI RI I RI I ' RI RI I RI RI RI i 3 X I RI I J q IC t N.RSN.LL DR twi—. RI RI - x jo n W CALTCNTC OR OLCCOTT OR R, L• • MH ' RI C-R1 RI R1 , �/Q•-t _ OF •C2 , R I RI R I R I RI-FP2 f i iff 4i.-..:_� I. T— — IILTfO j �Y� R2 \a,Rz! RI RI-FP2 -FP2. f ' -E ! C.rZ r RI � • RI R3 _q -FP2- I RI-FP2 , R2 !I R2 MN I ' 3 i?` RI-FP2 I ' 1 , RI RI - ROS w Eq. _ ' a�I `�'C FL- R a R I FP2 RI Ir RI I I RI I RI l. .. __------ . " OONLTN OIL s .•� t IF R P2 RI F11•NM•R CR RI I RI RI• % � R KP2 . jRjj a�ROS OI/^ CDNONDS ca. MEADOWLARK Ir R 1-FP2 i R2 SPECIFIC PLAN ,L RED cR --- ul R I FP2 JI - Ir ;,,.,.< _ RI-FP2J c D u - `.a.�.,„ RO$-FP2 = taov"r DR, Q • Q I �2 IRw i pPq R4 a RI ` 3 ; LL / , CD . � k RI /C4-FP2--P+ -FP2 I WARNER CUP 1 - 11 ZHUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION I September 12 , 1991 r M. Honorable Mayor Peter Green CID �- rn rn Council Members 2000 Main Street , 4th Floor Huntington Beach, CA c..o SUBJECT: APPEAL OF CUP # 91-11 The establishment of religious services, adult education classes and nursery/day-care facilities with joint use parking on R1 zoned properties. Honorable Mayor and Council Members; Huntington Beach is a wonderful place to live. However, living on or near secondary arterial streets has its drawbacks , such as increasingly heavy traffic , noise, pollution, and lack of parking . This is why we are filing an appeal to stop CUP # 91-11 . As Huntington Beach progresses into a new time of increasing growth and density, it is imperative that the community maintain higher levels of planned growth and improvements. Outlined below are our major concerns and reasons for filing an appeal of CUP # 91-11 . We know you will consider our concerns with the sincerity in which they are expressed and the attention they deserve. Thank you. Inadequate on-site parking , creating child/pedestrian danger. The Mormon church is already at or near capacity for their own functions on Sundays and most week nights, and occasionally spills onto neighboring streets. We do not feel they can adequately provide a daily joint parking situation for the Jewish Shabbat as required in CUP # 91-11 . The Mormon Church received their CUP # 77-14C in 1977 , which stated 85 excess parking spaces. In 14 years they have surely grown in member- ship to need these spaces for their own use. Increased automobile traffic and pedestrian traffic. Each year traffic increases tremendously, grows less manageable and more dangerous. The four-way stop at Heil/Graham is difficult in an automobile and dangerous to pedestrians. Much of the streets to the facility named in CUP # 91-11 are ill equipped for pedestrian traffic. EXAMPLE: Graham, between Heil and Warner has sidewalks only on the west side of Graham, about 50% of the distance. This is sporadic, not solid sidewalk, forcing pedestrians to walk into ditches, through neighbors yards or into an already o_v:erloaded and very narrow street. EXAMPLE: Facility named in CUP # 91-11 has no sidewalks to accommodate pedestrian traffic to services on Saturdays. This would force them into the street, onto a narrow bike path to gain access to their facility. Or they would have to make a crossing at Graham Place and Heil several yards down from the safety of crosswalks or stop signs. We can't emphasize enough of our concern for pedestrian safety and the already existing traffic problems. Hours of Operation. There seemed to be some discrepancy on hours of operation at the public hearing of the Planning Commissioners. The Rabbi indicated that the facility would be used daily between the hours of 6 :00 a.m. thru 12:00 p.m. midnite, while the permit specifies use only until 9:30 p.m. This will still impact the neighborhood in terms of noise until as late as 10:00-10:30 p.m. This type of use should not be allowed in R1 zoned areas. Additional structures to property. There has been some concern to the possibility of trailers, or other temporary type of structures being placed on the property. This will further impact parking and pedestrian problems. Is the Applicant currently in escrow to purchase property named in CUP # 91-11? If this is the case, then we strongly feel that improvements should be made to the property before a five year period. This would benefit the applicant as well as the neighborhood they have chosen to become a part of. As CUP # 91-11 reads now, no immediate improvements are offered. WHICH LEAVES US TO FEEL THAT THERE ARE NO BENEFITS TO THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD OR THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH IF SAID CUP # 91-11 IS APPROVED WITHOUT SOME CONCESSIONS. In closing , we hope that you will approve our appeal and grant us the opportunity to present our concerns in a public hearing . Attached is a petition signed by 62 nearby residents who oppose the approval of CUP # 91-11 Respectfully, Jerry T. Abshier James A. Bent 5471 Heil Ave. 16552 Graham P1'. Huntingtn Bch. , CA 92649 Huntington Bch. , CA 92649 . David Ichinaga Kevin Kelter 16551 Graham St. 16562 Graham St. Huntington Bch. , CA 92649 Huntington Bch. , CA 92649 Monique Lott Gary Nakase 5401 Heil Ave. 16521 Graham St. Huntington Bch. , CA 92649 Huntington Bch. , CA 92649 To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and r�� (0 0 The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners �. S 1 Sn a�eS We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . Name Address Sign: �, -- 1 S3 ( .41 6-) �- Print: �i�.vJ9ia� ��, 11 City zi p Sign: Print: City I707 zip rJ Z��j Sign: � E�� L Print: city zi f Sign: 6 l �. Print: l City zip q2i C�y Sign: Print: City Zip �zb Sign: 5 �� 0 67(. Print: " uw(Q City zip92.6 q ci Sign: !�: 3 6 L Print: P. n City µ /> Zip Z�o rJ Sign: . ��,.a,� �e .� 3 S�l r (� Print: �� L• � X 3C City 1 Zip 5 z� .Z Sign: �r � L Print: City � Zip Sign: _ S-341 067L Print: �lcc , h� p_ �,�J p�e.,0 City Zip sign: Print:, /f- City �• Zip 9 Sign: 5 6)/ dO C� Print: - City . zip, Z( `f( Sign: -- --�, z'..Q 5 -3 Q e7`C, Print: W:P L U(CA City ZipFZL y / A; , To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . Name Address sign: Print: 'L4 IA � r City 1yDj Zip 9Z(o�Cj Sign: '4*'4'JZ' a , Print: �L G�l City /j��j Zipg�p�� Sign: Print: o ?� City Sign: Print: f APIV4;)J City Zip Sign: _ <2/ 11 Print: , city ZLE9 Z Sign: /�c7YUNG- IU aAAUA Sz- `�- Print: City ��j� Zip l7 Z61,�9 Sign: 6�— Print: t� City /y A Zip L Sign: �SL� Print: / DLL City 14 1; Zip '�2-64 Sign: SSS ( 9&7 L Print: en City Zip eJ Zbg S Sign: A514 tv �Ss 1 ��-7 L Print: ,yLEX/aNOr� I= /��P�lGi City Zip cJZ(�jyCj . Sign: '�2 15 544., H E? L Print: City Zip 9 Zli�S Sign; Print: City Zip. Sign: Print: / City Zip To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil- and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . Nam , Address / Sign: J� $ A I LlJ �w L(/Gl� Print: City Zi p Sign: 14 5)-1 (7 a-At,A�-" Print: ( City �( , Zip -2- T sign: :;;57. Print: City Zip 7 T% Sign: Print: �Q fh SrP 4hJ City �&M4,�� 6dRIZip gzb Sign: , fib=f��-'4/G��D (l�S Z l ��R�-�n�a v"n � Print: V� City Zip jzu�L� Sign: / o?Og5/.2c�erraev d �•-� _ Print: a City 44,6 Zip 9�0rfq' Sign: Print: r-f c City (Z- ZipCj) �o Sign: Print: City Zip qz� 4� Sign: I (0cT72&ARAM 12LArL Print: City H .s��. ZiP%J &49 Sign: /6 S--5 �.uAc,K ?Z4C 4 Print: a--. s O. e T- A City 14 Zip 15 '26Y Sign: L 1C A Y c51 Print: FAd,4 A4,A46Z,5 City }�` ,,�� Zip o1 sign: 43�/-� ��D Print: City /rya Zip 9a-6Yh sign: � 1, ' �� Print: 1 S City _ Zips �Q G-4 C. L. - 1 s11C_ To: Kirk Kirkland, . Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach xho live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil- and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . /Z i Name Address Sign: 7/ S47 L Print: 7e Ti 5P City zta 9 261 Sign: Print: city zip 9 Sign: 5 S WL Print: City Zip 926, Sign: 5;L) 7 L Print: City Zip Sign: 5431 4r2 "-, Print: A City 0(3 Zip Sign: S' 543 y Q G Print. �, /Lr�.r�'. City /� / Zip % Zoo y9 Sign: SyZ. L dr / Print: `�i� C �YN City Zip Sign: t'4101 D IyA Print. City �� Zip Sign: 5Y Z 610 L r Print: City Zip 9 Zoo �1� Sign: i /TG / Print: City Zip 9 2_6 / I Sign: 5 `� &-2 C. Print: City Zip al 2-1 Sign: 5-L16) 6:7 L Print: City /7/e Zip 1 ' Sign: Ol 6 L Print: City Zip q Z6q 5 To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . Name } Address , Sign: Print: Sign: Print: Sign: 5- L Print: City Ziprj Sign: 4�- 1S /V 67 �- Print: LOA-0 City Zip 1157' Sign: Slo e Wt? L- Print: City Zip Sign: Print: S City zip Sign: Print: Sh&-v0 rX L_ �eP City it/� Zip 9760 Sign: / ��o f�67L Print: City 1� Zip 43 Z�C/ Sign: 5& L Print: Cit85 y zipZ Sign: ' Print: City Zip Sign: 5 6 Print: LRL76City Zip ,2 y� Sign: n Print: C �\ City /4'43 Zip Z 9 Sign: I Print: City Zip To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil- and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . Name Address Sign: ' � 1� 1�� C- ' C-/U Print: �►9�1nQS ✓'(�� City Zip Sign: 6✓ Print: AJ / 7'4 City / Zip 92_644r Sign: Print: City Zip 7•( �CJ Sign: Print: City / Zip Sign: S Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . N e Address 1 / sign: �� `5.S b ►�7 Print: City 1y Aj ZipG� Sign: �(r/1J `� � /� L Print: p City rri.5 Zip qua Sign: -V*' "I Ok 1 901, Print: 4,Al2Soi City k4A Zip Sign: v..-� Y r /.h_:s=i.fii^ iCK .J• V•2- Print: L�;?orr 3 5.�(/� Rr3�S�'r✓G- City f►'j� Zip �Z&t( Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip To: Kirk Kirkland, Chairman and The Huntington Beach Planning Commissioners We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach who live and own R1 property in the vicinity of the Heil and Graham area of the city hereby express our opposition for the application before you referenced as Conditional Use Permit No. 91-11 . Name Address Sign: �7`6Z 61,4z- Print: `Lc City 924�� Sign: Print: o�r?� c S� City Iq 8 Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: i Print: City Zip I Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip Sign: Print: City Zip IJ Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 September 6 , 1991 Haim Katzir/Rabbi Berkowitz 5702 Clark Drive #18 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 SUBJECT : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO . 91-11 (CONTINUED FROM THE AUGUST 20 , .1991 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) REQUEST : To permit the establishment of religious services , adult education classes and nursery/daycare facilities with joint use parking . LOCATION : 5432 Heil Avenue (Southwest corner of Heil- Avenue at Graham Street ) DATE OF APPROVAL : September 4 , 1991 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO . 91-11 : 1 . The location , site layout , and design of the proposed church with joint use parking properly adapts the proposed structures to streets , driveways , and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner . 2 . The combination and relationship of one church to another are properly integrated . The close proximity of the joint use parking lot and excess parking will. provide adequate parking and , therefore , are properly integrated . 3 . The access to and parking for the proposed church with joint use parking does not create an undue traffic problem . The joint use parking demand indicates an excess of parking and , therefore , will not impact the neighborhood . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO . 91-11 : 1 . The site plan , floor plans , and elevations received and dated August 14 , 1991 shall be: the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications : a . The site plan shall indicate the location of the single family residence to the southeast o.f the subject property . Conditional Use Permi( ,.,1o . 91-11 Page Two b . The floor plans shall indicate the use of the two (2) rooms on the east side of the building as religious services only and the two rooms on the west side of the building as classrooms only . 2 . Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . Joint use parking shall require that a Joint Use Parking Agreement be recorded between property owners prior to issuance of permits or occupancy . The Agreement shall provide parking for five ( 5) years . A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the City Attorney as to form and content and , when approved , shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder . A copy shall be filed with the Department of Community Development . b . Submit a Parking Management Plan for review and approval by the Community Development Department which contains parking space designations for participants/employees . The Parking Management Plan shall also identify key religious dates for .both churches and coordinate activities to avoid conflicts . c . Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished . d . Submit a set of revised plans pursuant to Condition No . 1 . 3 . The Public Works Department requirements are as follows : a . The developer will be responsible for the payment of the Traffic Impact Fees at the time of Certificate of Occupancy . b . Ingress and egress to be from Graham Place only . 4 . Fire Department Requirements are as follows : a . The applicant shall meet all applicable local , State and Federal Fire Codes , Ordinances , and standards . 5 . The facility ' s hours of operation shall be as follows : Religious Services Monday - Friday 6 : 30 AM - 7 : 30 AM Religious Services Saturday 9 : 00 AM - 1 : 00 PM Religious Services Sunday 8 : 00 AM - 9 : 30 AM Hebrew School Tuesday - Thursday 4 : 00 PM - 6 : 00 PM Adult Education Two ( 2 ) evenings per wk . 7 : 30 PM - 9 : 30 PM Day Care Monday - Friday 6 : 00 AM - 6 : 00 PM The applicant shall submit an adult education curriculum . establishing the days of operation prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 6 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division and Fire Department . Conditional Use Permi( !No . 91-11 Page Three '` 7 . A review of the use shall be conducted within six ( 6) months of the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and, thereafter, on a yearly basis up to five ( 5) years to verify compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable Articles of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . If , at any time , there is a violation of these conditions or code sections , Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 may become null and void . 8 . Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 shall be effective for a maximum period of five ( 5) years to September 14 , 1996 . 9 . Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 shall be non-transferable . 10 . This conditional use permit shall run with the applicant . Any additional activities beyond those proposed , changes in the floor areas or alterations to the site and buildings shall require the review and approval of the conditional use permit process . 11 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revise the terms of this conditional use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . 12 . This conditional use permit shall not become effective for any purpose until an "Acceptance of Conditions" form has been properly executed by the applicant and an authorized representative of the owner of the property and returned to the Planning Division . 13 . Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 shall become null and void unless exercised within one ( 1) year of the date of final approval , or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date . I hereby certify that Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach on September 4 , 1991 upon the foregoing findings and conditions . This approval represents conceptual approval only; detailed plans must be submitted for review and the aforementioned conditions completed prior to final approval . Sincerely, Mike Adams , Secretary Planning Commission by Hal Simmons Senior Planner ( 0688d-1 , 3 ) huntington beach department of community development srAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: September 4 , 1991 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-11 (CONTINUED FROM THE AUGUST 20, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: Haim Katzir/Rabbi Berkowitz DATE ACCEPTED: 5702 Clark Drive #18 August 6, 1991 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: PROPERTY Richard Krekemeyer/ October 5, 1991 OWNER: Engin & Shirley Uralman 5432 Heil Avenue ZONE: R1 (Low Density Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Residential) REQUEST: To permit the establishment GENERAL PLAN: Low Density of religious services , Residential adult education classes and nursery/daycare EXISTING USE: Pre-School facilities with joint use parking . ACREAGE: .65 acres (28 ,474 sf) LOCATION: 5432 Heil Avenue (Southwest corner of Heil Avenue at Graham Street) 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Motion to : "Approve Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 with findings and suggested Conditions of Approval for a maximum of five (5) years to September 14 , 1996 . " 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 is a request to permit the establishment of religious services, adult education classes and nursery/daycare facilities with joint use parking pursuant to Section 9630 . (c) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. This item was continued at the applicant ' s request to address parking concerns and to amend the submitted site plan. A fl_�J1 A-F M-23C Parking The applicant has requested to amend the floor plan of the proposed building to correctly identify each room' s use. As orignally submitted, each room (four [41 rooms total) is identified as a mult'i-purpose room and; therefore, staff used the most restrictive parking ratio for its parking calculations . Based upon this, staff used the public assembly area parking ratio of one parking space for every 35 square feet of _gross floor area (2, 352 square feet divided by 35 equals 67 . 2) , which required a total of 68 parking spaces . The applicant ' s revised floor plan indicates that the two (2) rooms to the east side of the building shall be used for religious services only and the remaining two (2) rooms to the west shall be used for classroom purposes only. The following table indicates the parking required based upon the revised floor plans : Parking Requirements Use Sa. Ft ./Rooms Standard Spaces Required Day Care Two (2) rooms 1 per staff 4 spaces (west) 1 per classroom Adult Two (2) rooms 7 per classroom 14 spaces Education (west) Hebrew Two (2) rooms 1 . 5 per classroom 3 spaces School (west) Religious Two (2) rooms 1 per 35 sq. ft . 30 spaces Services 1, 05.0 sq. ft . public assembly (east) Total 51 spaces As can be seen by the above parking requirements, a total of 51 spaces are required for each use as revised by the applicant . This is a reduction of 17 spaces as originally required. Even though the total parking required for all uses on-site is 51 parking spaces , the applicants are requesting joint use of parking for their site based upon the divergent need of parking, days of operation and hours of operation. The following table indicates a maximum need of 34 parking spaces at any time for the applicant ' s proposed combination of hours and type of operation. Staff Report - 9/4/91 -2- (0600d) Joint Use Parking Demand Use Days Hours Reg. Parking Religious M - F 6 : 30 - 7 : 30 AM 30 Services Religious Sunday 8 : 00 - 9 : 30 AM. 30 Services Religious Friday 6 : 30 - 7 : 30 AM 30 Services Religious Saturday 9 : 00 AM - 1 : 00 PM 30 Services Adult Two (2) 7 : 30 - 9 : 30 PM 14 Education evenings per week Hebrew Tue & Thur 4 : 00 - 6 : 00 PM 3 School Day Care M - F 6 : 00 AM - 6 : 00 PM 4 Religious M - F 6 : 00 AM - 7 : 30 AM 34 Services/ Day Care In addition to the joint use of parking request for the establishment of the church, the applicants are requesting joint use of parking with the existing church to the west . This is necessary because the applicant is only able to provide four (4) parking spaces on-site . _Thirty (30) additional off-site spaces are; therefore, needed . The original establishment of the church to the west required a total of 201 parking spaces, however, a total of 286 parking spaces are provided for an excess of 85 parking spaces . The attached Planning Commission staff report dated August 20, 1991 outlined the overall parking that is available through the joint use parking agreement with the existing church to the west . The existing church has agreed to provide thirty (30) spaces at all times to the applicants for their joint use . The aforementioned joint use parking demand table indicates that at no time does the total parking demand exceed the total parking provided by the applicant and that no conflict regarding the availability of parking will occur . 3 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Motion to : "Approve Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 with findings and suggested Conditions of Approval for a maximum of five (5) years to September 14 , 1996 . " Staff Report - 9/4/91 -3- (0600d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 91-11 : 1 . The location, site layout, and design of the proposed church with joint use parking properly adapts the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. 2 . The combination and relationship of one church to another are properly integrated. The close proximity of the joint use parking lot and excess parking will provide adequate parking and, therefore, are properly integrated. 3 . The access to and parking for the proposed church with joint use parking does not create an undue traffic problem. The joint use parking demand indicates an excess of parking and, therefore, will not impact the neighborhood. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-11 : 1 . The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated August 14 , 1991 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications : a . The site plan shall indicate the location of the single family residence to the southeast of the subject property. b. The floor plans shall indicate the use of the two (2) rooms on the east side of the building as religious services only and the two rooms on the west side of the building as classrooms only. 2 . Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . Joint use parking shall require that a Joint Use Parking Agreement be recorded between property owners prior to issuance of permits or occupancy. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder . A copy shall be filed with the Department of Community Development . b. Submit a Parking Management Plan for review and approval by the Community Development Department which contains parking space designations for participants/employees . C . Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished. d . Submit a set of revised plans pursuant to Condition No . 1 . Staff Report - 9/4/91 -4- (0600d) r 3 . The Public Works Department requirements are as follows : a . The developer will be responsible for the payment of the Traffic Impact Fees at the time of Certificate of Occupancy. b. Ingress and egress to be from Graharm Place only. 4 . Fire Department Requirements are as follows : a . The applicant shall meet all applicable local , State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances , and standards . 5 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department . 6 . A review of the use shall be conducted within six (6) months of the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and , thereafter, on a yearly basis up to five (5) years to verify compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable Articles of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . If, at that time, there is a violation of these conditions or code sections , Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 may become null and void . 7 . Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 shall be effective for a maximum period of five (5) years to September 14 , 1996 . 8 . Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 shall be non-transferable . 9 . This conditional use permit shall run with the applicant . Any r additional activities beyond those proposed, changes in the floor areas or alterations to the site and buildings shall require the review and approval of the conditional use permit process . 10 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revise the terms of this conditional use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . 11 . This conditional use permit shall not become effective for any purpose until an "Acceptance of Conditions" form has been properly executed by the applicant and an authorized representative of the owner of the property and returned to the Planning Division. 12 . Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval , or such extension of time as moray be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date . 11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may deny Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 with findings and conditions of approval . Staff Report - 9/4/91 -5- (0600d) ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Area map 2 . Site plans , elevations and floor plans dated August 13 , 19.91 3 . Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 20, 1991 HS: : jr Staff Report - 9/4/91 -6- (0600d) il uC nDOwI nN Sp RI I H - ----RI M !RI RI RI _ RI RI I RI RI �RI I RI RI II RI I I I l l Qi RI �-� l: _ I I ✓�ue ASNCLt OR . :JaMAY'r. � •� I�' I t 3 i C2 C>L "`IDDLC iDrr DA u4 ,f'nFiO`f a M H R I I �_- R I R I --�� R I �� gyp C2 - R I R I _ R I -- —� R I RI-FP2 fPI .. — -- - - --- -._ .,. .. . ._...T,.—._. MEIL � 'G�f� R2 -'R2 RI a RI-FP2 _ -FP2 CR is LL—c- i "RI • .r•:w.N.DD. p RI-FP2 IC2 = R2 g R2 MH RI RI ( R3RI-FP2/ : :•: _ Ili a, RI FP2 l i RI ROS CR. III R I-FP2 RI Jla R1 l�l RI I I- .-�-----� ooNLrN o RI + R I-FP2 RI Rl RI �I f'¢ I FRANMAR CR R I- P2 �R� °ROS OI/ L DuouDS C. N — s MEADOWLARK : /N'. RI-FP2 i R2 SPECIFIC PLAN ?, / a, G. DNCD cR -I:... i - 1-< - ImRz PI I' veSeT RI-FP2 a RI r V-CW-`:RJ C4 FP2 -� i ^r..lI 7 RI f E ��( 17/ r CUP 9 1 - 11 �l z � HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION H E 1 U W / Oi ' . w r W U 1 'O I ,Y j < O I O I w _ _. .-za I z� ...ac---'•4 'a-�..9 ter''--"'>- +L•_s.��'-''�af21 -- __ �.c ` �n.vs>� r � .. • I I d ., ' r'\ � ..E.�6' � I I ��!�.o � /.7 � jNh` ITT al 9 ECTIONQ ORTSICT MAP I II[\,- ` - •• ' -, ' J(� C , Q w-� y' \ . ,:HWIT YGTO(Y FBEACH I ;I �- 1�i• -..>i-.�v 'off Y'_� \J ocancc cooarT:uuroaalA I � 4 "-�=,,--- "` - --- - � .�«...•�..- d obi !At CCL ArU Ols;41GT Mw�-j (pn=u�t=I I I v .. .•",)•��_ -! be•7::0 O V �ALG SUc ^•er»z _., j I I h r•tc.s+a 'A'uILIs.L 9T`'h.le �-mil-•.�F1.i....r. ..� L^ I ^.':1 u is VAL I ' I z I Ti I, eUt_ OESC��o-Icy 4ECOxC-r.O C�+KEG: i it lo�i.+b al CMwpap d wKi aaw� rj�.lT- S i I .. - - - -./•L' �. Ol. •.tCE_wo 4.: 770: -.`�JC?.IVE -:S I .—_—_—___—_ /Ef E��C� o'-^Gam 1ACCEl D �iAw':.�'Y. _EALr•..- ._:a1 Z 'i 31•EE' �' N > o z r r'.• a < O x g Y e a� �t a 0 OC Q�LI `LoosOC C.LAff n �J LL= . L-L a Ti I o � as v 1 EYIST i-JE FLoo° 'LAN 3�Ce- Y 3 i yx}2a y} 3 �y o �- a `. yx4 Z V WSS7 eUEVATIC-J 14'.r-o' �nuT H _e•.avAT ION _ ___Y+'.�-.Q_ .�"" Eld ED o� i < 3 \IOGTM = =VA�ION ��'.I'-O' ISI:�Er It tington beach department 6 community development sra f f EPOR TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: August 20 , 1991 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO . 91-11 APPLICANT: Haim Katzir/Rabbi Berkowitz DATE ACCEPTED: 5702 Clark Drive #18 August 6 , 1991 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: PROPERTY Richard Krekemeyer/ October 5 , 1991 OWNER: Engin & Shirley Uralman 5432 Heil Avenue ZONE : R1 (Low Density Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Residential) REOUEST: To permit the establishment GENERAL PLAN: Low Density of religious services , Residential adult education classes and nursery/daycare EXISTING USE : Pre-School facilities with joint use parking . ACREAGE : . 65 acres (28 , 474 sf) LOCATION : 5432 Heil Avenue (Southwest corner of Heil Avenue at Graham Street) 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION : Motion to : "Approve Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 with findings and suggested Conditions of Approval for a maximum of five ( 5) years to August 30 , 1996 . " 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION : Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 is a request to permit the establishment of religious services , adult education classes and nursery/daycare facilities with joint use parking pursuant to Section 9630 . (c) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . A91ML A-FM-23C 3 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENFERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1 (Low Density Residential) LAND USE : Pre-School North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1 (Low Density Residential) LAND USE : Single Family Residential East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE : R2 (Medium Density Residential) LAND USE : Multiple Family Residential South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Low Density Residential ZONE : R1 (Low Density Residential ) LAND USE : Vacant West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Low Density Residential ZONE : Rl (Low .Density Residential ) LAND USE : Church 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class 1 , Section 15301 of the California Environmental Q=uality A,ct . 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS : Not applicable . 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS : Not applicable _ 7 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable . 8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE :. Not applicable . 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS : The applicants , representing Chabad of West Orange County, are requesting approval of Conditional Use Perrmit No . 91-11 to establish religious services , adult education classes and nursery/daycare facilities within an existing 2 , 914 square foot nursery school building . A total of four (4 ) on-site parking spaces are provided for the existing school site . The existing, nursery school building and use have been in operation since 1968 , however , the current use will cease should the applicant ' s request be approved . Staff Report - 8/20/91 -2- (0465d) The following is a breakdown of the general hours of operation for the proposed uses : RELIGIOUS SERVICES DAYS HOURS PARTICIPANTS Monday-Friday 6 : 30 AM - 7 : 30 AM 10-15 Members Sunday 8 : 00 AM - 9 : 30 AM 10-15 Members Friday 6 : 30 PM - 7 : 30 PM 10-20 Members Saturday 9 : 00 AM - 1 : 00 PM 100 Members ADULT EDUCATION DAYS HOURS PARTICIPANTS Two (2) Evenings 'Per Week 7 : 30 PM - 9 : 30 PM 25 Members HEBREW SCHOOL DAYS HOURS PARTICIPANTS Tuesday & Thursday 4 : 00 PM - 6 : 00 PM 10-20 Members DAYCARE DAYS HOUR PARTICIPANTS Monday - Friday 6 : 00 AM - 6 : 00 PM 10-20 Members As proposed, the applicants are requesting establi -shment of the use for an initial period of five (5) years . No physical __ mprovements to the building and/or public improvements to the site are proposed for the establishment of the temporary use . The exist -ing fenced site is developed with a 2 , 914 square foot building and playground area with associated apparatus on the westerly one-half of the lot and a fenced grass area on the easterly ore-ha °lf of the lot . The fenced grass area is part of the overall propeity tit _ s not currently used by the nursery/daycare facility _ Tr_e public improvements which are needed consist of , 1) a 27 foot right of way dedication on Graham Place, 2) a 33 foot radius dedication at Heil Avenue and Graham Place, 3) full improvements to the centerline of Graham Street and Graham Place and, 4 ) full sidewalk improvements on Heil Avenue . These improvements have been determined not to be necessary at this time based upon the temporary nature ;of' the use and the fact that no physical improvements to the site are proposed . Staff Report - 8/20/91 -3- (0465d) The applicants will submit a new conditional use permit application at the end of the temporary five (5) year period to re-establish the use with full on-site and public improvements required to be in place . The applicants have submitted a conceptual site plan for the proposed use which indicates all public improvements , on-site parking , landscaping and a building envelope for the future church site . Joint Use Parking Pursuant to Section 9600 . 4 and Section 9606 . 1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code the applicant are requesting the joint use of parking for the establishment of the proposed church facility. The joint use parking lot is located approximately 200 feet to the southwest of the proposed church facility. The applicant ' s site currently is provided with four (4) on-site parking stalls and the joint use request is to utilize the adjacent church parking lot across Graham Place to the southwest to provide the remainder of the parking . Included as an attachment to this report is a preliminary joint use parking agreement by and between the two parties involved . A formal agreement must be obtained and recorded for both properties prior to Certificate of Occupancy. PARKING FACILITY REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED PARKING Existing Church (CUP No . 77-16) 201 286 Proposed Church (CUP No . 91-11 68 4 Total 269 290 The establishment of the church facility requires a total of 68 spaces based upon the public assembly area of the building (2 , 352 square feet divided by 35 = 67 . 2) . The adjacent (west) church was established in 1977 by Conditional Use permit No . 77-16 and was required to provide a total of 201 parking stalls . The existing church parking lot is provided with a total of 286 spaces which is an excess of 85 spaces . Therefore, the joint use of both facilities for parking would demand a total of 269 spaces ( 68 spaces plus 201 spaces equals 269 spaces) and provide an excess of 21 parking spaces . 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Motion to : "Approve Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 with findings and suggested Conditions of Approval for a maximum of five (5) years to August 30 , 1996 . " Staff Report - 8/20/91 -4- (0465d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-11 : 1 . The location, site layout., and design of the proposed church with joint use parking properly adapts the proposed structures to streets , driveways , and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner . 2 . The combination and relationship of one church to another are properly integrated . The close proximity of the joint use parking lot and excess parking will provide adequate parking and, therefore, are properly integrated . 3 . The access to and parking for the proposed church with joint use parking does not create an undue traffic problem. The joint use parking demand indicates an excess of parking and, therefore, will not impact the neighborhood . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO , 91-11 : 1 . The site plan, floor plans , and elevations received and dated August 14 , 1991 shall be the conceptually approved layout . 2 . Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . Joint use parking shall require that a Joint Use Parking Agreement be recorded between property owners prior to issuance of permits or occupancy. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder . A copy shall be filed with the Department of Community Development . b. Submit a Parking Management Plan for review and approval by the Community Development Department which contains parking space designations for participants/employees . c . Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished . 3 . The Public Works Department requirements are as follows : a . The developer will be responsible for the payment of the Traffic Impact Fees at the time of Certificate of Occupancy. b . Ingress and egress to be from Graham Place only. 4 . Fire Department Requirements are as follows : a . The applicant shall meet all applicable local , State and Federal Fire Codes , Ordinances , and standards . 5 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the .Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department . Staff Report - 8/20/91 -5- (0465d) 6 . A review of the use shall be conducted within six (6) months of the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and, thereafter , on a yearly basis up to five (5) , years to verify compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable Articles of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . If , at that time, there is a violation of these conditions or code sections , Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 may become null and void . 9 . Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 shall be effective for a maximum period of five (5) years to August 30 , 1996 . 10 . Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 shall be non-transferable . 11 . This conditional use permit shall run with the applicant . Any additional activities beyond those proposed shall require the review and approval of the conditional use permit process . 12 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revise the terms of this conditional use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . 13 . This conditional use permit shall not become effective for any purpose until an "Acceptance of Conditions" form has been properly executed by the applicant and an authorized representative of the owner of the property and returned to the Planning Division . 14 . Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11. shall become null and void unless exercised within one ( 1) year of the date of final approval , or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date . 11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may deny Conditional Use Permit No . 91-11 with findings and conditions of approval . ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Area map 2 . Narrative 3 .' Site plans , elevations and floor plans dated August 13 , 1991 4 . Adjacent church site plan 5 . Conceptual future church site plan 6 . Joint Use Parking Agreement HS f kj 1 Staff Report - 8/20/91 -6- (0465d) :co ro i RI U U RI 4EADOWIANn R 1 —---_ c vAR cm MH 12 RI RI RI RI RI RI I RI „RI I RI RI RI R I NARSNAEI DR I 1JL R I_ _m VVJJ ' !"] I LAU DE ENrE CR �DFCOrr J DR s fNfAQ~i0a l.L - MH RI RI RI RI P R I R I R I R I R11 FP2 Px C C�- HEIE, A ... ... , _...y—._ . ?i_.. 'I RI RI-FP2 Rp AN cR yFP2 CJ RI( RI-FP2 I RI RI R3 IC 2 R 2I R 2 r M H FP2 R1-FP2 ten,- — ------ RI RI : RCS cA. S sn oR C F —1 R o cj a R I-FP2 <n Rl)d RI �� RI � RI �. _. ..-,_ —_._I DDNEYN D RI R I-FP2 t RI—� R1 I� 7RANM4R CR 1 i R I-FP2 I a I a�RI( III .'ROS-01 r EEDD.00NDS�CR, 11 ,� MEADOWLARK �;V ` / W RI I-FP2 ' R2 SPECIFIC PLAN Ri - "' `Q- z WEDRED CR. R R IfP -' -->a+SuzL., ROS—FP2 R°°NY °R C 2 A ! R 4> O I _ I~ s<.• —��u' y..e,c J vIEw CR. / ` 'C4-FP2 AI I a .-•�. . .,.,,. 9 Ca pl I� RI L h , OF L I ��-FP2;' —..T.1._ .... ' WARNER \�T CUP 91 11 L HUNTINGTON BEACH (' HUNTWGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION 11. Narrative of the proposed use: This application is being initiated due to prospective purchase of the proposed site by Chabad of West Orange County. Request: To permit the establishment of religious services, adult education classes and offices for the Rabbi and Administrator. And to maintain the existing use as Nursery/Day Care center. The site is an existing nursery school situated next to a church. The proposed use is for a Synagogue as well as Nursery/Day Care center. The Nursery/Day Care hours of operation are scheduled to be Monday thru Friday 6: 30am - 6:OOpm.' (During the winter months Friday hours shall be 6: 30am - 2: 30pm) . Closed on legal holidays and all Jewish holidays . Hours for operation for the synagogue : Friday 6: 30pm-7: 30pm (only 1 hours ; fluctuates with sunset) 10- 20 participants Saturday 9:OOam-1:OOpm 100 participants Sunday 8:OOam-9: 30am 10 participants Monday Tuesday Wednesday 6:40am-1 : 30am 10 participants Thursday Friday J Regular hours for Adult Education are 2 evenings per week , from• 7 : 30pm - 9 : 30pm. In addition to the regularly scheduled religious services , additional three hours services are held throughout the year on various Jewish holidays . The Chabad currently has approximately 70 family members . Saturday morning service has the highest attendance. Since it is customary to walk rather than drive on the Sabbath , many of the congregants will walk to the Saturday morning service. o! _ �'o l Js-J. a m o z !- ICIL A.V�NUc � -. O� �441 �xUrol.t1•OY.•.!e SECTIOIVit DISTUCT MAC S I I '• ,e,•+•::', j - ,a i \ 77 �l Q J� CCITY OF ;� �•,.._: u_.; �,, C � s. �: {.: j . Mj, I GTON BEACH Rol OtANC[ CCYPTT.'C.LLOEaL I--� j ••• s.- °At GGL ArD DI��41L' MArS ��o St1Le� � � •"` '� G a b = . OGC_•.,L,. S...GC 5.1E A.j ; I }, r-e-'�G-�_ �A �•E••'SE+s�a _ G- P L A V I J•2d-O' I I - xdl I i j I II CoSZIlu t lu J d. I• Ltf.+L. ,^.JESC�I�'lo� RECD¢G:O Lwr:E4: m�IJs a.l cN�n•o d.._s-a4i,,,.e vr+r. D702 �JG x1vE �:D p •I I i k.Y E5�c3 e_C.'CO �ACLEL n ••Uw._...-J•- ?EALr,C_ . 55 G�v+4. • Yn� st•. .. YEE- I _ r a V U l Z qY Z 0 b Y �Y• a �3 d O nl� ILL 1 A >c OC P�j IL Y EXIST I.I16 FLOC., LA�I ��{�-(-G• r Z S i� J w .0 Eiji EO !� 'j• 1VT�:J L ��jl'',IIIr a - _ EA Si EL-EVA7io!•I •s',r-o• r jil ILL- EEI � `15 • I��I � I � _„j e � z L Ij titit Nc TN �VA7I0W J�•.f-O' 5"EErTr � v 5P4c�siD� � � u , I � ,j'• ro P''-' �'I �-�•t�-,..'T-�ii•rn�y ^ri n7 i�.w 1 ^r_ K I I I � ( ( � � I -�; ; , I.. ,.��I,- �y �_i:±� �-, �- :� f � i f I I I I �1 I� I•�-I � � �-_-._ i��--__ f , :Y , t,l IYV ••I.-(Ii-'IIL'�S :1 i- � +, lir. .e I�T I.V �j II.:_: .. I�.�..'I.:"' i:7 I,••1-`I•l .x 1•i :L".':MI1••�Yf 14 � .. ; .. :1 4 I � I.o � I I• I r. ; I. ./:�\` `. - b.: - `�. —r-•—ti'' I —' i I. '_J ( �•11111 •' ' I Ji - � rc:}n [i,is::f ..�::>(= L�L_ I � __ - �n I. I,c � _l.-�.a•L:.I:�.I s I-` 1I � � ._ -S?` ! I '� :I f. I_. [rre es m - I iL�Y -! i4 - b�-7 lei. �!,y •nn fir.:is la � rI I la.. � . .� I I "; I U II °�"s �, i � I• � I j y i l i I I Y i A I I ry i j i g �' I �`� � I. _,,...�., ' ;� I 1 _� �' I I h if Iro to L. I•r. '�, '- r..,. Z I n 111 +1•• I S Ij ' W L 4> I �s Ir is i- '- i, 'h i. ` ..._. __ __ �I, : I i un1 I•.11. I �� rvc�ee'r :r W 411- m a - .__. \ � `` \ \ \ \ � �•.t/�,'tu4` r,� mil. - .. T 91 CL l7 I Qma ell ►f ro I Hsu GCA-,,� a 0 LR r:,. LICENSE AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into as of the day of 1990 , by and between the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints , a Utah corporation sole , hereinafter referred to as "Licensor , " and Chabad of West Orange County, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Licensee . " E _Q 1 T A L a: A . Licensor is the owner of certain real property in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California , commonly known as 5402 Heil Avenue ( the "Church Property" ) , on which is situated a meetinghouse facility and an associated parking lot ( the "Parking Lot" ) . B . Licensee desires to purchase certain real property currently used as a nursery school ( the "Chabad Property" ) , which is located adjacent to and to the east of the Church Property, and to convert the same for use as a religious meetinghouse . C . The City of Huntington Beach requires that Licensee satisfy certain parking requirements as a condition of receiving a conditional use permit to use the Chabad Property for religious services . Licensee intends to install parking facilities on the Chabad Property, but desires a temporary parking license from Licensor until such on-site parking. facilities can b,e completed . D . Licensor is willing to allow Licensee to use a portion of the Parking Lot for parking on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth . NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained , Licensor and Licensee agree as follows : 1 . Grant of License Licensor hereby grants to Licensee a non-exclusive license to use a portion of the Parking Lot for the parking of passenger vehicles on all of the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth . Licensee ' s use of the Parking Lot shall be limited to the area outlined- in red on the diagram attached hereto as Exhibit A, which area may be changed by Licensor from time to time . Licensee shall not have the right to use any more than thirty (30) parking spaces in the Parking Lot at any one time . I 2 . Term of License . The term of the license herein provided for shall commence on the date Licensee acquires fee simple title to the Chabad Property and shall continue i thereafter for a period of three ( 3 ) years or until this Agreement is earlier terminated . 3 . Restrictions on Use . The Parking Lot shall be used by Licensee solely for the parking of cars and light passenger trucks and shall not be used for parking buses or other similar heavy vehicles or for any other use . Licensee f 2533T : 110390 -2- shall use the Parking Lot only during those times when Licensee conducts meetings on the Chabad Property, and shall not use the Parking Lot for overnight parking; provided, however, that not more than ten ( 10) parking spaces may be used for overnight parking during the Jewish sabbath and during other religious holidays of Licensee when driving is proscribed . Licensee hereby agrees that no person who shall use the Parking Lot , shall smoke, use profanity, consume any coffee, tea or alcohol of any description, use any illegal drug or participate in any immoral conduct upon the Church Property . Licensee shall comply with such reasonable additional rules and regulations governing the use of the Parking Lot as Licensor may from time to time establish . 4 . Alterations and Maintenance of Parking Lot . Licensee shall not make any additions , alterations , changes or improvements to the Parking Lot or erect or display any signs thereon . Licensee shall use the Parking Lot in such .a way as to avoid any damage or destruction to paving , landscaping or other improvements and shall remove any and all debris left upon the Church Property by reason of Licensee ' s use thereof . Any damages to the Parking Lot caused by Licensee or arising out of the use authorized by this Agreement shall be repaired by Licensor at the sole cost and expense of Licensee . Licensor shall have the right , without any liability whatever to Licensee, to close the Parking Lot from time to time for any Purpose deemed appropriate by Licensor , including , but not 2538T : 110890 -3- limited to , (a) performing maintenance or repairs to the Parking Lot , (b) improving or altering the Parking Lot , (c) repairing j any of the other improvements on the Church Property, or (d) conducting outdoor activities sponsored by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints ( the "Church" ) . 5 . Indemnity . Licensee shall and does hereby assume and agree to be responsible for the conduct of any and all I persons that shall use the Parking Lot under the provisions of this Agreement . Neither Licensor , the Church, nor any entity affiliated with Licensor or the Church , nor any of their respective officers , principals , agents , employees or invitees (collectively the " Indemnitees " ) shall be liable for any loss , damage or any other cost or expense of any nature whatsoever , including without limitation, injuries or other casualty of any nature caused to the person or property of anyone , including Licensee, on or off the Church Property, including the Parking I Lot , arising out of , or resulting from the use , possession or f operation of the Parking Lot or any portion thereof by Licensee r or by Licensee ' s officers , agents , members or invitees , or from defects in the Church Property, whether apparent or hidden, or from the installation, existence , use, maintenance , condition , repair , alteration , removal or replacement of any improvements on the Parking Lot , whether due in whole or in part to negligent acts or omissions of any of the Indemnitees . Licensee , for itself , its successors and assigns , hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the Indemnitees harmless from and against any and all ----�-- _ 2538T : 110890 -4- costs and expenses , including attorney ' s fees , incurred by, or imposed on the Indemnitees by reason of any such loss , damage, injury or other casualty. Licensee also agrees to pay all costs and expenses , including attorney ' s fees , incurred by any of the Indemnitees in the event that Licensee shall default under the provisions of this paragraph . Licensor and Licensee hereby agree that the Church and the affiliates of Licensor and the Church referred to above shall be intended third party beneficiaries of this Agreement . 6 . Insurance . Licensee shall maintain, at its own expense throughout the full term of this Agreement , public liability and 'property damage insurance, naming Licensor and the Church as additional insureds , written by an insurance company which is a member of the Bureau of Casualty and Surety Underwriters , or another insurance company approved by Licensor , with coverage in an amount not less than Five Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($500 , 000) for injury to or death of a single person , not less than, One Million and No/100 Dollars ($1 , 000 , 000) for injury to or death of two ox more persons in a single accident , and not less than Five Hundred Thousand and N0/100 Dollars ($500 , 000) for property damage , resulting from anything occurring from any cause on or about or in connection with the use of the Parking Lot or anything located thereon , including the means of ingress to or egress from the Parking Lot . Licensee shall deliver to Licensor certificates or other evidence satisfactory to Licensor evidencing such insurance . ..------- Licensee shall endeavor to procure from such insurer or insurers , in writing , and for the express benefit of Licensor and the Church , a waiver of all rights of subrogation which said insurer or insurers might otherwise have against Licensor or the Church .. Any insurance policy obtained under the terms of this paragraph shall provide that not less than ten ( 10) day ' s prior written notice of cancellation must be given to Licensor by the carrier. 7 . Compliance with Laws . Licensee shall comply with all laws , ordinances , orders , rules and regulations enacted or promulgated by all state , federal , municipal and other governmental agencies and bodies relating to the use, condition and occupancy of the Parking Lot . 8 . Assignment . The non-exclusive license herein granted is personal to Licensee and may not be assigned or otherwise transferred . Any attempted transfer or assignment by Licensee shall be void and confer no rights upon any third party . 9 . Termination . In addition to any and all other remedies provided by law, Licensor shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving ninety ( 90 ) day ' s advance written notice to Licensee , or such lesser notice as may be reasonable under the circumstances , upon the occurrence of any of the following events : ( a) If Licensee has not acquired fee simple title to the Chabad Property by the two hundred seventieth (270th) day following the date of this Agreement ; 8T : 9 0 -6- . (b) If Licensee materially breaches any of the terms , covenants or conditions of this Agreement and fails to cure the same not later than ten ( 10) days after receiving notice of such breach in writing ; (c) If Licensor , or the City of Huntington Beach or any other regulatory authority, determines. that this Agreement violates the terms of the conditional use permit pursuant to which Licensor occupies and uses the Church Property or violates any other permit , license , rule or regulation of the City of Huntington Beach or other applicable authority; (d) If Licensor undertakes to alter or modify the improvements on the Church Property in any respect and is informed by the City of Huntington Beach or any other authority that it will be unable to obtain any necessary permit or license to perform such work as a result of this Agreement ; (e) If any portion of the Parking Lot i5 taken by eminent domain or deeded to a governmental authority in lieu of condemnation ; or ( f) If Licensee sells or otherwise transfers or conveys the Chabad Property, converts the Chabad Property to a use other than primarily religious , educational and social purposes , or otherwise ceases to use th.e Chabad Property for weekly religious services . 10 . Notices . Any notice allowed or required to be given under this Agreement shall be given in writing and shall be delivered personally or by express registered or certified mail , return receipt requested , postage fully prepaid and addressed as follows : To Licensor : North American West Area , Church Office Building Annex 61 East North Temple Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84150 Attention : Richard Hatfield With copies to : Kirton, McConkie & Poelman 1800 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111-1004 Attention : Read R. Hellewell William D . Bawden 16412 Mercier Lane Huntington Beach , CA 92647 To Licensee : Barry S . Tabachnick, Esq . 6 Hutton Center Drive , Suite 845 Santa Ana , California 92707 Either party shall have the right to change the address or addresses for notices to such party by notifying the other party in writing of such change in the manner specified by this paragraph . 11 . Entire Agreement . This Agreement , together with the exhibit to it which is made a part of this Agreement , incorporates all representations and the entire understanding between the parties to this Agreement with respect to the subject matter of it and constitutes the entire agreement of Licensor and Licensee with respect to the license provided for herein . Any prior correspondence , memoranda , understandings , offers , negotiations and agreements , oral or written , are 2538T : 110890 -8- replaced in total by this Agreement and the exhibit attached to it . This Agreement may not be modified or amended except in a I writing signed by both parties hereto . 12 .. Cost to . Enforce . In the event that this Agreement shall be in default by reason of the conduct of a party hereto, any and all costs and expenses incurred in the enforcement of the provisions hereof , including attorney ' s fees , whether by suit or otherwise, shall be paid by the party who breaches or defaults hereunder , including fees and costs incurred upon appeal or in bankruptcy court . 13 . Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California . 14 . Interpretation Qf Agreement . The parties acknowledge that each party and its counsel have reviewed and revised this Agreement and that no rule of construction to the I effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments or exhibits to it or any document executed and delivered by either party in connection with this agreement . 2538T : 110890 79- 15 . Captions . All captions in this Agreement are for i }=� - - ;`' reference only and shall not be used in the interpretation of =p` is Agreement or any re-lated document . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Licensor and Licensee have �r ;, = executed -t'his Agreement as -of the day a-nd year fi-rst wri.t•ten above . LICENSOR: CORPORATION OF THE PRESI-DING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH -OF JESUS CHRI,ST OF 'LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a Utah corporation -sole By: Its Authoci-zed Ag-en-t LICENSEE : CHABAD -OF WEST ORANGE COUN Y, a California -co porati n BY: L� 2538T : 110890 -10- RCA - ROUTING SHEET/CHECKLIST WHITE - REMAINS WITH RCA GREEN - ADMINISTRATION COPY CANARY - CITY ATTORNEY'S COPY PINK - CITY CLERK'S COPY GOLD - DEPARTMENT COPY INITIATING DEPARTMENT CpMMy(11Tu �FU�1DP{ WATE tj �, SUBJECT&P raj_. OP APPRQVAL� QF CUP N-1� MEETING DATE ll ��aj� AGENDA DEADLINE (TO ADMINISTRATION) YES NO PUBLIC NOTICE [ ] [ ] PUBLICATION DATE LEGAL DEPARTMENT(With Exhibits) Date In Date Out INITIATING DEPARTMENT REVIEW/CHECKLIST: YES NO N/A Ordinance [ ] Exhibit 1 Resolution ( ] Exhibit 2 [ ] [ ] Signed Contract [ ] Exhibit 3 Signed Agreement ( ] Exhibit 4 Neg. Dec/EIR Insurance Required Additional [ ] Exhibits Nbr. Bonds Required [ ] [✓] [ ] Financial Impact statement (Unbudgeted Items Over $1,000) RCA - City Council RCA - Redevelopment Agency INITIATING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL BY: [ ] ADMINISTRATION REVIEW [ ] CITY CLERK FOR AGENDA COMMENTS: '` y THEE CIS YY'V;F H�ti'NT�NGTON� BEACH .tom ;�: .i.. � •��j .4