The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPub Hear-Appeal PC denial CUP 91-25 w/Spec Permits/ZC 91- STATE CALJFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a PUBLIC NOTICE aration:6)reduced setback resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the between main recreation NOTICE OF area and a dwelling unit:7) age of eighteen years, and not a party to or PUBLIC HEARING permit a cabana in lieu of a APPEAL OF clubhouse facility; and 8) interested in the below entitled matter. I am a PLANNING reduction of the required COMMISSION'S private accessway require- principal clerk of the HUNTiNGTON BEACH moot.The proposal also in- principal OF c(udes a zone change re- INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general CONDITIONAL USE quest to add the PD PERMIT NO. (Planned Development) circulation, printed and published in the City of 91.25 WITH suffix to the existing un- SPECIAL PERMITS/ derlying R1 (Low Density Huntington Beach County of Orange CF State of ZONE CHANGE Residential) zoning deCgF-- nation and remove the - NO.91.3/ E (Community Facilities- Califomla. and that attached Notice is a true and TENTATIVE TRACT Education)overlay. P NO. pellant complete copy as was printed and published in EMIT GATED 5/ appeaaling the APPL, ThepPlanninig NEGATIVE Commission's consecutive the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley DECLARATION split vote (February 19. NO.9 ATI 1992 and March 3, 1992) issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s)of: (Construct on the above mentioned 58 Unit Single applications. The Planning 9 Commission did not reach Family Dwellings) a majority vote in favor of NOTICE IS HEREBY approval or denial on the -�`bIVEN that the Huntington applications on consecu- Beach City Council will tive meetings and therefore hold a public hearing in the the applications is deemed —Council Chamber at the denied based upon the fail- ;"ntington Beach Civic ure to reach a majority Center, 2000 Main•Street, vote. Huntington Beach, Califor• ENVIRONMENTAL STA- n1a,on the date and at the TUS: This project is cov- time Indicated below to re- ered by mitigated Negative April 9, 1992 celve and consider the Declaration No.91-15. statements of all persons PUBLIC HEARING PRO- who wish to be heard role- CEDURE: (1) Staff Report; five to the application de- (2) Public Hearing; (3) City scribed below. CCouncil Discussion;and(4) DATE/TIME: Monday, City Council Action April 20.1992,7:00 PM COASTAL STATUS: Not APPLICATION NUMBER: applicable. Conditional Use Permit No. ON FILE: A copy of the 91-25 with special permits, proposed request is on file Zone Change No. 91-3, in the Community Develop- Tentative Tract Map No. ment Department, 2000 14515 and Mitigated Nega- Main Street. Huntington tive Declaration No.91-15 Beach, California 92648, APPLICANT/APPELLANT: for Inspection by the pub- Tumanjan/ Fountain Valley lic. Partners,L.P.III ALL INTERESTED PER- LOCATION:declare. under penalty of e u that the t ovnAvenue York- SONS are invited at attend p �7 p � �r (a p- said hearing and express foregoing is true and correct proximately Ave feet south opinions or submit ehe of Yorktown Avenue,south- dance for or against the west side of Education application as outlined. Lane-Bushard School) above.If you challenge the April 9 ZONE: CF-E (Community City Council's action In Executed onr 199.L Facilities-Education)/ Un- court, you may be limited! derlyIng RI (Low Density to raising only those issues! at Costa Mesa, California. Residential) you or someone raised at REQUEST: To subdivide the public hearing de- 10.15 gross acres of land scribed In this notice, or in Into a 58 unit detached sin- written correspondence de- gle family residential livered to the City at, or planned development with prior to,the public hearing. Sinature special permits. The spe- If there are any further g cial permits are for: 1) re- questions please call Herb duction of the minimum ex- Fauland. Assistant Planner terior sideyard; 2) re- at 536-5271. duction of tpe Interior side- Connie Brockway, yard setback: 3) reduction City Clark of the Interior sideyard set- Published Huntington back for garages; 4) Beach Independent April 9, re- duced side to side building separation; 5) reduced ao- 1992 cgssway and building sep- 042.479 „ PROOF OF PUBLICATION U V REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date April 20, 1992 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administr Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Developme Subject: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-25 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS/ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-3/TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14515 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLAR tATION NO. 91-15 y oJIc L ? �Q Yes [ ) New Policy or Exception aPPR V. �G� .3I 0 iState e#-lssa� eco mendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: 6Pae,,o �TV CLI:KIi 5�5��4 aZ STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Tumanjan/Fountain Valley Partners L.P. III to the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 with Special Permits and associated entitlements to subdivide 10 . 15 gross acres of land into a 58 unit detached single family residential planned development with special permits . The proposal also includes a zone change request to add the PD (Planned Development) suffix to the existing underlying R1 (Low Density Residential) zoning designation and remove the CF-E (Community Facilities-Education) overlay. The Planning Commission on consecutive meetings (February 19, 1992 and March 3 , 1992) failed to reach a majority vote on the above mentioned entitlements . The failure was due to philosophical differences among the Commissioner' s with regards to the recycling of vacant/surplus school sites for development. The Planning Commission' s differences centered on the loss of a public facility and or public land which has been used for open/recreation space versus the school districts need to generate revenue from surplus sites. Based upon the Planning Commission' s failure to reach a majority vote in favor or denial of the entitlements proposed on consecutive meetings, the project is automatically deemed denied pursuant to the Planning Commission By-Laws . The applicant (Tumanjan/Fountain Valley Partners L.P. III) is appealing the Planning Commission' s non-decision and automatic denial of the project. RECOMMENDATION• Staff Recommendation: Motion to: Overturn the Planning Commission' s denial by; A. Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 91-15 with mitigation measures; and r r PIO 5/85 B. Approve Zone Change No. 91-3 with findings by adopting Ordinance # C. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 with Special Permits and Tentative Tract Map No. 14515 with findings and suggested conditions of approval as outlined in Attachment No. 2. Planning Commission Action on February 19 , 1992 : A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY NEWMAN TO DENY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-25 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS AND ASSOCIATED ENTITLEMENTS BY THE FOLLOWING NOTE: AYES: Newman, Shomaker, Leipzig NOES: Dettloff, Richardson ABSENT: Kirkland, Bourguignon ABSTAIN: None MOTION TO DENY FAILS: Item automatically continued to the next scheduled meeting of March 3, 1992 because there was not a four (4) vote majority. Planning Commission Action on March 3, 1992: A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOURGUIGNON, SECOND BY DETTLOFF TO APPROVE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-15 WITH MITIGATION MEASURES BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Kirkland, Richardson, Newman, Dettloff, Bourguignon NOES: Leipzig ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Shomaker MOTION TO APPROVE PASSED: A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY NEWMAN TO DENY ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-31, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14515 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-25 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS WITH FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTES: AYES: Kirkland, Newman, Leipzig NOES: Richardson, Dettloff, Bourguignon ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Shomaker MOTION TO DENY FAILS: Under the Planning Commission By-Laws, failure to achieve four (4) votes on the same item at two (2) consecutive meetings causes the items to be deemed denied. RCA 4/20/92 -2- (2899d) ANALYS I SI S: eject Background: Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 with Special Permits and Tentative Tract Map No. 14515 is a request to subdivide 10. 15 gross acres of land into a 58 lot detached single family residential planned development with private streets and private open space areas pursuant to Section 915 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 14515 is the request to subdivide the southerly 10. 15 gross acres of the existing 18. 19 gross acre site which includes the currently open Oka Elementary school to the north and demolish the closed Bushard Elementary school for development. The special permits are for 1) reduction of the minimum exterior side yard; 2) reduction of the interior side yard setback; 3) reduction of the interior side yard setback for garages; 4) reduced side to side building separation; 5) reduced accessway and building separation; 6) reduced setback between main recreation area and a dwelling unit; 7) permit a cabana in lieu of a clubhouse facility; and 8) reduction of the private accessway requirement. Zone Change No. 91-3 has been initiated to add the PD (Planned Development) suffix to the underlying R1 (Low Density Residential) zoning designation. The existing CF-E (Community Facilities-Education) overlay shall be removed pursuant to Article 946 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code which permits the removal of the overlay administratively by the Director. The existing General Plan land use designation for the site is Low Density Residential . The proposed development is consistent with the existing land use designation. Project Description: The proposed project is to subdivide 10 . 15 gross acres of land into a 58 unit detached single family residential planned development with private streets, sidewalks and a private recreation area. The recreation area consists of a cabana, restrooms with showers, a swimming pool with spa and a tot-lot play area. Minimum lot widths range from 33 feet to 50 feet with minimum lot areas ranging from 5,000 square feet to 9,360 square feet. Vehicular access to the site will be south from Yorktown Avenue on Education Lane and west from Brookhurst Street on Constitution Drive. The subdivision is provided with two (2) access points on Education Lane. The main entry is designed as a four (4) way intersection at Education Lane and Constitution Drive with a secondary access point designed as a T intersection at Education Lane and Garrett Circle. The subdivision is not proposed to be a gated community and, therefore, allows public vehicular and pedestrian travel through the tract. The development will provide pedestrian access to Bushard -Park to the west, Oka Elementary School to the north and access to both facilities from the apartments to the south through public pedestrian access easements . RCA 4/20/92 -3- (2899d) I 1 The proposed detached single family product type consists of unit sizes ranging from 2,075 square feet to 2,750 square feet. The units consist of a three (3) bedroom, two and one-half (2-1/2) bath and a two (2) car garage unit to a four (4) bedroom, three (3) bath and three (3) car garage units. Additional parking is provided behind each garage along with on-street parking. Each unit is provided with private open space ranging in area of 1,200 square feet to 3, 890 square feet. The architectural style is a modern two (2) story, California style with cut-up windows, stucco, wood siding and tile roofs. Special Permits The following is a discussion of the special permits requested and staffs recommendation. The eight (8) special permits have been grouped into the four (4) general sections of the- code in which deviations of the development standards are noted: Setback Special Permit - The proposal includes three (3) special permits for the minimum side yard setback requirement. They are 1) a reduction of the minimum exterior side yard setback requirement of 20 feet; 2) reduction of the interior side yard setback requirement of 10 feet; and 3) reduction of the interior side yard setback for garages of 10 feet. The intent of these setback requirements is to buffer each dwelling from one another when generally designed as an attached clustered townhome/condominium development. The PD (Planned Development) development standards are not tailored or designed for detached single family residential development. As proposed detached single family dwellings, the applicant has conformed to the side yard setback requirements of a typical R1 development which requires a setback of ten (10) percent of the lot width and a maximum of five (5) feet. Every lot of the subdivision conforms to the typical R1 side yard setback requirement. Staff supports the special permit request. Building Separation Special Permit - The proposal includes three (3) special permits for the minimum building separation requirements. They are 1) reduced side to side building separation requirement of 12 ' -6" for two (2) story dwellings; 2) reduced accessway and building separation requirement of 15 feet; and 3) reduced setback between the main recreation area and a dwelling unit requirement of 20 feet. The intent of these building separation requirements is to adequately separate clustered type development from the potential noise impacts associated with travel lanes and the main recreation area. Again the proposed development conforms to the intent of the typical R1 development standards and not the exact intent of the PD development standards. Staff believes that adequate separation is provided for each single family dwelling unit and that no adverse impacts will occur. Staff supports the special permit requests . RCA 4/20/92 -4- (2899d) Recreation Area Special Permit - The proposal includes a 13,500 square foot main recreation area with a cabana, restrooms and showers, a swimming pool with spa and a tot-lot playground. The PD development standards requires a project which has 50 units or more to provide a clubhouse facility. The intent of this requirement is to provide a large gathering facility for special events for the typical condominium or townhouse development that does not generally have enough floor area or private open space to entertain their guests. The applicant' s proposal provides detached single family homes with floor areas ranging in size from 2,075 square feet to 2,750 square feet. In addition each unit is provided with a private open space area ranging in size from 1,200 square feet to 3, 890 square feet. Staff believes that the provision of a cabana, swimming pool and tot-lot area is sufficient for the proposed detached single family development. Staff supports this special permit. Vehicular Accessway Special Permit - This special permit request is to deviate from the requirement to reduce the 48 foot wide travel lanes, 100 foot deep entrance to a width of 40 feet. The intent of this requirement is to allow two (2) lanes of vehicular traffic to enter and exit the project. The designed main entrance at Education Lane and Constitution Drive does not meet this requirement. However, the project is provided with a secondary entrance and exit at the T intersection of Education Lane and Garrett Circle. The two (2) points of access are adequate to provide the necessary vehicular movement for this type of development. Staff supports this special permit. Summary of Special Permits: The analysis of the special permits indicates that staff is in general support of the eight (8) special permits requested. Staff believes that the applicant has met the intent of •the planned residential development standards for detached single family dwellings and that the project will promote a better living environment, provides aesthetically pleasing architecture and has utilized proper land planning techniques . Floodplain The proposed subdivision is located within a flood hazard area which are subject to 100 year flooding. The site has two (2) flood zone designations: 1) Flood Zone AO, depth 03; and 2) Flood Zone AE elevation 14 . Based upon these flood zones the development must comply with Article 940 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance. Code. To accomplish this the project site must be elevated approximately 0-3 feet, in addition the applicant proposes to utilize raised foundations which will place the lowest habitable floor at or 12 inches above the base flood elevation. This technique will not exempt the potential homeowners from Federal Flood Insurance. The applicant will be required to disclose this fact to all potential buyers as a condition of approval for the proposed project. RCA 4/20/92 -5- (2899d) i Zone Change The applicant is proposing to add the PD (Planned Development) suffix to the existing underlying R1 (Low Density Residential) zone and remove the Community Facilities-Education (CF-E) overlay designation. The addition of this suffix allows the applicant a density of 6 . 5 units to the gross acre and a maximum bedroom count of 20 per gross acre. The subdivision proposes 58 units and 202 bedrooms . The overall density for the project is 5 .7 units to the adjusted gross acre. This is below the density of seven (7) units to the gross acre allowed through the General Plan for a typical; R1 (Low Density Residential) development. The addition of the PD suffix does permit the applicant reduction of lot -area and lot width and also permits the development to be privately maintained. Staff believes that the density of 5.7 units to the acre, minimum 5, 000 square foot lots and minimum lot widths are properly designed and, therefore, supports the zone change request. Affordable Housing Planning staff believes that the provision of affordable housing opportunities throughout the .City as stated in the Housing Element of the General Plan is an important one. The City Council, Planning Commission and Affordable Housing Task Force have all recognized the need for all residential projects to address this issue. In fact, the Affordable Housing Task Force has recommended that residential project of more than 3 units should provide affordable housing. The simplest solution would be to place the units on-site. Planning staff does recognize that it may be difficult to expect the applicant to provide 20 percent (12 units) of on-site affordable housing in a project which is designed with detached single family residential dwellings. The applicant may submit an affordable housing. plan which provides options for securing affordable housing. The options may include but are not limited to: A. Build affordable units at an alternative location which is under control of the applicant. All units shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with the primary project and final approval of the project shall be contingent upon completion and final approval of the affordable units . B. Rehabilitate existing units and ensure long term affordability. C. Preserve existing affordable units for the long term (30 years) . D. Other options which generate new opportunities for affordable housing. RCA 4/20/92 -6- (2899d) i School Site The recycling of school facilities for development is a recent trend in the City which is a primary issue raised by this development proposal . A total of 50 public school facilities have been developed within the City and by the end of this year a total of 19 (38%) of the schools will be closed. A number of these closed school sites do, however, serve other purposes both private and public. The Bushard Elementary School which has been closed since 1978 currently operates a nursery school established in 1985 for approximately 20 children. The applicant has indicated that relocation assistance will be provided for the nursery school and Planning staff has included a condition of approval which will require written proof of assistance and or relocation. Public uses for the closed school site include the open space amenity of playing fields for the neighborhood and until recently the school housed the Boy' s and Girl ' s Club of Huntington Beach which has been relocated to their new facility on Delaware Street . The proposed development of this site has brought to attention the fact that numerous closed school sites have the potential of development. It has also motivated staff to analyze very closely the issues that this development or any future school site development has on the educational demands placed on the City' s school system. To adequately verify that the open school facilities within the project area can accommodate current and projected school enrollment, staff contacted the Fountain Valley School District to provide a current assessment and a contingency plan. If enrollment should begin to increase the City Council should be aware that Oka Elementary School is at capacity. The school district -currently operates three (3) schools in the City of Huntington Beach. These three (3) are Oka Elementary, Newland Elementary and Talbert Middle School . The district also has three (3) closed public school facilities . They are Wardlow School, Arevalos School and Lamb School. The District indicates that if the need warrants the reopening of schools due to current school enrollments increasing, both Wardlow and Arevalos have been reserved to be reopened for public school uses. Staff ' s analysis of the Bushard-school site centered on several issues which staff felt justified the development for single family residential development. The issues are: 1. The existing zoning (R1) and General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Residential are in place. The site is not zoned or general planned for open space. 2 . The site is not a regional facility used for recreational purposes and not heavily used. 3 . The site is located within and in the middle of a quarter-section developed with residential uses. 4 . The site has been closed for public school purposes since .1978 and has become a deteriorated nuisance. RCA 4/20/92 -7- (2899d) i 5 . An existing school (Oka Elementary) is located immediately to the north along with Bushard Park (2. 5 acres) immediately to the west. 6 . The Boy' s and Girl ' s Club has been relocated to its new facility and the applicant will be required to provide relocation assistance to the nursery school which currently operates at the site. i 7. The Fountain Valley School District has a contingency plan and other elementary schools available which are located within a one (1) mile radius which may handle the need for additional demands on the school system. 8 . Planning staff is recommending an affordable housing -plan. Staff acknowledges that the trend in developing school sites is an important one that will need further staff analysis and review. This review will include a demographic and land use study which may indicate a pattern that may over burden the existing open school facilities. These facts and current trends are items that both Planning staff, Planning Commission and City Council will need to consider in the future. The City Council should be aware that staff is in support of the subdivision with special permits and zone change based upon the recommendation that an affordable housing plan be required as a condition of approval for this project. Planning staff would recommend denial of the entire request without the affordable housing provision. Given the fact that this is a school site and the trend in the City is to develop these sites, Planning staff would require additional studies to be completed to adequately assess the impact associated with the development of the school sites . FUNDING SOURCE: Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION• The City Council may overturn the Planning Commission' s action on March 3, 1992 by approving Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 91-15, Zone Change No. 91-3, Tentative Tract Map No. 14515 and Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 with special permits with findings and suggested conditions of approval. i i RCA 4/20/92 -8- (2899d) ATTACHMENTS• i 1. Area Map 2 . Findings and Conditions of Approval 3 . Letter of Appeal dated March 4, 1992 4 . Ordinance No. 5 . Project Narrative 6 . Site Plans, Floor Plans, Building Elevations dated January 29, 1992 7. Tentative Tract Map dated January 8, 1992 8. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 91-15 9 . Fountain Valley School District letter dated December 12, 1992 10. Applicant ' s letter of opposition to Affordable Housing dated February 7, 1992 11. Alternative Findings for Denial MTU:MA:HF• lp RCA 4/20/92 -9- (2899d) KRE PP DR. , FLOUNDER _ DR -^.:µA.l ........ .,... ..-.. .___ DR. R I J I I I RI-FP2 RI FP2 s RONNEY DR POL C. _ OR I DR u RI RI RI RI J RI RI - MH RI-FP2 'N J a RI-FP2 MH-� I a a BLANC D ::AI1.\I:',1� I I u- LL c00. CA INI 111I� I a _ RI (------ R I a i a F P N � - � 1I u- c RI-FP2 CF E 2 K > rA o.o. _ _.(1_.• I I I _ 1 ' N00 rr100 JI `-t R I Ya( _o o � RI ;I RI tI RI RI R;- j ICI I RI-FP2 { GRAND OR 2 �I G jW : C4 P' Z-�--�� i �I CNRISTMAS CA RI-FP2 = .19: oa.:TowN R I M RI-FP2 R I-FP2 ry g' GREEN•NICM DR, c� RR'-�.--__- DR a MONITOR DR. EQ •',1 u RI Sl �El RI RI l RI RY FP2 - RI-FP2 3 a ¢ Mxar PORTSMOUTH R. �-�� VALLEY FORGE DR HANGRI A DR� I ' RI RI —J s CF-E RI RI-FP2Cu N NANTUCKET OR pu :, .='1. 17"] / r`� lOwO ,� CRRIMAC DR a a u { �r / f F__ _ lL lL R I RI ._�F.,R . / Ruh s RI R I FP2 cr CF-E-FP2 NYANNfS PORT DR. _ - CDwf it uilOw-_, - rCh STiT Ory DR ¢¢ I J I:i::•': ;`•.5!:':('.:::,) .; , r 4 m .Awbuwl ,�w ' UTi W I- RI RI 1RIF R RI-FP2 CS z CAPE COD DR. I(I..Aw ` w� F -_- .._.._._.._._..—' r.L ._. I7 m:;M:we DM LURUNE OR. - RI +« ` wf '[ ✓. r.�r. ;fC ee Y N SHALOM R. ` z = R� -" -� io RI-FP2 RI-FP2 _ GROTONDRJ ma\ri _-_--_lpc� J¢li R31IiR3I RS 11R3 .IR3I' R3 ¢7 Ti a: 3 OR. RI-FP2 . r----- 4 I i —� R2 = li I li_ RI-FP2 = 3' r� l .•4. ..�.f - _I I M.YIRETANIA CR. r. ; R2-FP2 •rr .oa. Da r R3 -i,^U)eL.--- ---,• .._ I_— —_FP2____.__ =_---..__t. ' I'NJ RI-FP2 _.— �.ieo: .p-R2 - _ _= Txa .� - 3 3-F j T� l �I p' . .I�- i R 3 FP2 R P? 3 �' lai I I 3 R3I R} IFIR r R (( li I uNw w i ORONSAY C RI RI R R RI R 1 3, 3 �R3 I R}�r R3 R3�Z R3r-� RI zI R li N (V P u 3 FP2 "a,FP7 a a ; !.�Y*r•(i;..��r' r� ' l ` i I ',� I ..I I :i: IL u- +...A� I• I CZ-FP2 W W I R3 " Rl FP2 Q V z �.. o R3 •��M� RS - R3'FP2 3 !/� N 2) 5{ G ¢ •I P 3 J 1�1._ R J•,• :: �, ",r. C L 1 ( P. o n R3 X R3 R3I IR3-FP v> u a -�' z R:.r A. i7�T�r�TTIlTT�T/�� Tl��'Tii�fTl�TlppM�l�l/Tlll / /, r CUP 91 -25/ZC 91 -3 FOE TT 14515/ND 91 - 15 ZHUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ATTACHMENT NO, 2 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 91-25 : 1. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed 58 unit planned residential development with eight (8) special permits does properly adapt the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. The access to the project, the detached single family dwellings, the building height and bulk are compatible with the adjacent structures and uses . 2. The proposed 58 unit planned residential development with eight (8) special permits is compatible with surrounding properties in terms of architecture and orientation. The detached single family dwelling layout, building bulk and building height are properly addressed through design implementation. 3 . The access to and parking for the proposed 58 unit planned residential development with eight (8) special permits does not create an undue traffic problem. The two (2) access points for the project and the minimum code required parking provides improved on-site and off-site traffic circulation and adequate parking. 4 . The planned residential development for a 58 unit project with eight (8) special permits generally conforms to the provisions contained in Article 915. 5 . Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 for a 58 unit planned residential development with eight (8) special permits is consistent with the goals and objectives of the_ City' s General Plan and Land Use Map designation. The intent of the land use designation and zoning suffix (PD) is to provide a better living environment and promote aesthetically pleasing development. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMITS: 1. The following special permits do promote a better living environment by adapting the Planned Residential Development requirements which enhance the area and provide a compatible project with the surrounding area: a) reduction of the minimum exterior sideyard; b) reduction of the interior sideyard setback; c) reduction of the interior sideyard setback for garages; d) reduced side to side building separation; 1 e) reduced accessway and building separation; f) reduced setback between main recreation area and a dwelling unit; g) permit a cabana in lieu of a clubhouse facility; and h) reduction of the required private accessway requirement. 2 . The requested special permits do provide for maximum use of aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, landscaping, design and detached single family dwelling building layout. 3 . The requested special permits will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience, and not detrimental and injurious to the value of property and improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general . The building bulk, building height and circulation have been properly addressed and will not be a detriment to the surrounding neighborhood. 4 . The requested special permits are consistent with the objectives of the Planned Residential Development standards in achieving a development adapted to the terrain and compatible with the surrounding environment. The proposed detached single family residential project does provide a better living environment and an aesthetically pleasing project through design implementation. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 14515 : 1. The size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design features of the proposed subdivision for a' 58 unit planned residential development with eight (8) special permits are in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the City Subdivision ordinance. The subdivision as proposed for single family residential purposes is properly designed to the zoning designation and planned residential development suffix by the use of land planning techniques and the use of aesthetically pleasing architecture, landscaping, site layout and design. 2 . The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time that the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (7 units per gross acre) and R1 zoning were implemented. 3 . The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the proposed planned residential density of six and one half (6-1/2) units per gross acre. The proposed subdivision for single family residential purposes of a 58 ,unit planned residential development with eight (8) special permits is designed properly. -2- (2904d) t 4 . Tentative Tract No. 14515 for a 58 unit planned residential development with special permits is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. The project does provide a better living environment through proper land planning techniques . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO, 91-3 : 1. The proposed zone change from R1 (Low Density Residential) to R1-PD (Low Density Residential-Planned Development) and removal of the CF-E (Community Facilities-Education) overlay does conform with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 2 . The proposed zone change from R1 (Low Density Residential) to R1-PD (Low Density Residential-Planned Development) and removal of the CF-E (Community Facilities-Education) overlay is consistent with surrounding and existing land uses. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 91-25: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated January 29, 1992 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2 . Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. Submit three copies of the site plan to the Planning Division for addressing purposes. If street names are necessary, submit proposal to Fire Department for review and approval. b. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to backflow devices and Edison transformers, on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks. c. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. d. If foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department and indicated on the floor plans. e. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials proposed. f. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any view. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors. If screening is not designed specifically into the building, a rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing -screening and must be approved. -3- (2904d) g. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations. h. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. i . An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the geologist' s report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. j . The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 3 . Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, size, quantity) , an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval . The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9607 and Article 915 . 18 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits . Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio with minimum 36-inch box trees, which shall be incorporated into the project' s landscape plan. b. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit) . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. C. Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted for Public Works approval. -4- (2904d) d. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. e. Final Tract Map No. 14515 shall be accepted by the City Council, recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy filed with the Department of Community Development. f . An interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development to assure adequate parking is available for employees, customers, contractors, etc. , during the project' s construction phase. g. Submit copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificate. 1 h. Maintain current water level of service by complying with water system improvements contained in the City' s Water Master Plan and specific Water Department recommendations. Compliance shall be demonstrated prior to issuance of building permits . * i . The applicant shall provide written proof of the relocation or financial assistance of relocation of the existing day care/pre-school facility operating at the Bushard School. j . The project shall comply with Section 9150. 19 Miscellaneous Requirements of Article 915 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. k. The proposed project shall meet all requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program and Article 940 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The applicant shall complete the following (for each structure or dwelling unit) : 1. Prior to issuance of a foundation only permit, the applicant shall submit a report from a registered professional engineer or architect that the proposed structure or dwelling unit has been designed to withstand the forces generated by the 100 year flood pursuant to Section 60.3(5) of the Floodplain Management Regulations . The plans shall indicate that the lowest habitable floor has been elevated at least one (1) foot above the base flood elevation. 2 . Prior to issuance of building permits for the remainder of the structures or dwelling units, the applicant shall submit an Elevation Certificate prepared by a licensed engineer or surveyor which shall certify that the lowest habitable floor to be constructed on the existing foundation has been elevated at least one (1) foot above the base flood elevation. 4 . The Public Works Department requirements are as follows: a. On-site sewers shall be private. b. The developer will be responsible for the payment of the Traffic Impact fees at the time of final inspection. * Mitigation Measure -5- (2904d) c. Submit a soils report and grading plan for Public Works approval prior to issuance of building permits. d. Full Public Works improvements are required. e. Hydrology/Hydraulic studies shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits. f . Drainage flows from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed. Flows shall be accommodated per Public Works Department requirements. g. On-site drainage shall not be directed to adjacent properties, but shall be handled by a Public Works Department approved method. h. Low volume fixture heads shall be incorporated into the design of the water system. i . Developer shall us "drought tolerant" plants and turf for all common area landscaping. Landscape plans shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. j . A sewer study shall be submitted for Public Works Department approval prior to issuance of building permits . The developer shall design and construct the on-site and off-site sewer system required to serve the development. k. Install concrete bollars at 6 feet on center along the access to Bushard Park. 1 . Prior to issuance of grading permits, applicant shall obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Industrial Stormwater Permit for construction activities from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Evidence that this permit has been obtained shall be submitted to the city Engineer, Department of Public Works. m. The sewer system through City park property, requires the approval of the Director of Community Services prior to final map approval. n. Prior to issuance of grading permits, plans depicting the location, type, size, and quantity of all existing plant material which will be removed or relocated as a result of the project shall be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works. * 5 . Fire Department Requirements are as follows: a . On-site fire hydrants shall be provided in number and at locations specified by the Fire Department. * Mitigation Measure -6- (2904d) i b. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards . 6 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 7 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 8 . Installation of -required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection/within twelve (12) months . 9 . During construction, the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel ( .05% by weight) for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts) ; e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts . 10 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7: 00 AM to 6 :00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Saturdays, Sundays and Federal holidays. 11. Prior to final building permit approval or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be completed: a. All improvements (including landscaping) to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. b. Final Tract Map No. 14515 shall be accepted by the City Council . It shall be recorded with the County Recorders Office and a copy submitted to Plannning Division prior to Certificate of Occupancy or final inspection of first unit. c. Compliance with all conditions. of approval specified herein shall be accomplished. *Mitigation Measure -7- (2904d) d. The subject property shall enter into irrevocable reciprocal pedestrian access easement(s) between the subject site and adjacent properties . These easements shall provide access to the Oka Elementary School to the north, the Bushard Park to the east and access to both facilities from the apartments (The Continentals) from the south. These easements shall be granted in perpetuity. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the Community Development Department and the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. A copy shall be filed with the Department of Community Development. 12 . The applicant shall disclose in the White report and CC&Rs the fact to all potential buyers that all single family dwellings within this subdivision are not exempt from Federal Flood Insurance requirements. 13 . The applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying the Park and Recreation Fees in effect at the time the final map is accepted by City Council. 14 . This conditional use permit shall not become effective for any purpose until an "Acceptance of Conditions" form has been properly executed by the applicant and an authorized representative of the owner of the property, and returned to the Planning Division. 15. Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 with Special Permits shall not become effective until Zone Change No. 91-3 has been approved by the City Council and in effect. 16. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. 17. Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 with Special Permits shall become null and void unless exercised within two (2) years of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Division a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 14515: 1. The tentative tract map received and dated January 8, 1992, shall be the conceptually approved layout. The tentative map shall expire two (2) years after final action unless extensions are granted by the Planning Commission. 2 . Public Works requirements are as follows : a. All vehicular access rights to Education Lane shall be released and relinquished to the City except at private street intersection. -8- (2904d) 3 . At least 60 days prior to recordation of the final tract map, CC&R' s shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney and the Department of Community Development. The CC&R' s shall reflect the common driveway access easements, and maintenance of all walls and common landscape areas by the Homeowners ' Association. 4 . Applicant shall submit an affordable housing plan which provides for 20% of the total units (12) approved to be affordable to families of low and moderate income. Said plan shall be executed prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract of final map submittal. The affordable units shall be under construction or available to the public prior to final building permit for the homes in Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 . The plan may include but are not limited to: a. Build affordable units at an alternative location which is under control of the applicant. All units shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with the primary project and final approval of the project shall be contingent upon completion and final approval of the affordable units . b. Rehabilitate existing units and ensure long term affordability. c. Preserve existing affordable units for the long term (30 years) . d. Other options which generate new opportunities for affordable housing. -9- (2904d) y 3so-37 TUMANJAN/FOUNTAIN VALLEY PARTNERS, L.P. III 15901 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210 LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260 (310) 214-5162 March 4, 1992 VIA FAX & U.S. MAIL The Honorable City Council CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH D Jul 2000 Main Street Huntington Bench, CA 92648 NAR 0 6 1992 RE: Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 With Special CITY OF HUNTINGTON BCACH Permits/Zone Change No. 91-3/Tentative Tract Map CITY COUNCIL OFFIC^C No. 14515 Dear Honorable Council Members: We, the Applicant for the above-referenced subject site, hereby appeal to the City Council, the 3-3 vote of the Planning Commission of March 3, 1992. On March 3, 1992, testimony was taken and a staff report was presented to the Planning Commission which recommended approval for our project. The Planning commission was split which caused an automatic denial due to City of Huntington Beach procedures. Please place us on the City Council's earliest agenda to receive a proper forum for our project. Very truly yours, TUMANJAN/FOUNTAIN VALLEY PARTNERS, L.P. III er A. Delgado Director of Construction PAD:paa m a� cc: Michael Tumanjan Marc Ecker Eric Bathen John Necarsulmer Huntington Beach Planning Commission rV ' TUMANJAN/FOUNTAIN VALLEY PARTNERS., L.P: III 15901 HAWTHORN,E BOULEVARD, SUITE 210 LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260 (.213) 214-5162 February 4 , 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Tentative Tract #14515 58 Lot Single Family Planned Residential Development Education Lane at Yorktown Avenue 9 . 76 Acres Tentative Tract Narrative A. EXISTING USE OR USES OF THE PROPERTY AND PRESENT ZONING: Site is a closed elementary school (Bushard School) and a gymna.sium. Existing zone is Rl-SP2 , low density residential with C F-E overlay . State of California has declared Bushard School surplus . B. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY. IF PROPERTY IS PROPOSED TO BE USED FOR MORE THAN ONE PURPOSE, THE AREA, LOT OR LOTS PROPOSED FOR EACH TYPE OF USE SHALL BE SHOWN ON TENTATIVZ: MAP• Propose to divide site into a 58 lot Single Family, Planned Residential Development on 9 . 76 net acres from a 18 . 49 net (19 . 2 gross) site . Remainder of site or 8 . 73 net acres to remain as an elementary school (Oka School) . C. STATEMENT OF IMPROVEMENTS AND PUBLIC UTILITIES, INCLUDING WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL, PROPOSED TO BE MADE OR INSTALLED AND THE TIME AT WHICH SUCH IMPROVEMENTS ARE PROPOSED TO BE COMPLETE: Construct internal private roads with verticle curb and gutter, public water main extensions for fire and domestic uses, gas main extension, sanitary sewer extension, tele- phone, electrical and cable t. v. .undergrounded. All utilities underground. Improvements shall commence within six months from date Planning Commission approves Tentative Map and complete improvements six months thereafter. City of Huntington Beach Tentative Tract #14515 February 4, 1992 Page 2 D. PUBLIC AREA PROPOSED: None. E. TREE PLANTING PROPOSED: Minimum 50, 30" box trees and 50- 24" box trees. Washingtonia Rubostus and Coco Palms. F. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS PROPOSED: CC & R's, Articles of Incorporation, (Homeowner's ASSOCi7 ation; hereon attached) . Project is a Planned Residential Development with Associ- ation and restrictions to protect and administer development . G. MISCELLANEOUS - INFORMATION: 1. Two developer's, neighborhood input meetings were held prior to formally making application to city. Everyone within a 300 ' radius were invited. On October 9 , 1990 , +/- 186 people attended. On April 4 , 1991, +/-150 people attended. 28 homeowners signed a petition in favor of proposed project, (copy attached) . 2 . Bushard School Site is a surplus school site which was closed in 1978 . In 1981 a ground lease was signed with the Boy'-s Club and the City of Huntington Beach for 25 years. The Fountain Valley School District and City of Huntington Beach are relocating Boy' s Club and providing funds. 3 . Development is a 50%-50% joint venture with the Fountain Valley School District and Tumanjan Development. Fountain Valley School District will receive 100% of land cost plus share in 50% of all profits. TUMANJAN/FOUNTAIN VALLEY PARTNERS, L.P. III 15901 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210 LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260 (310) 214-5162 February 4, 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Tentative Tract No. 14515 "PACIFIC COVE" 58 Lot Single Family, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DE'VELOF'MENT Education Lane at Yorktown Avenue 10. 4 Acres Huntington Beach, CA Conditional Use Permit - General Plan R1-SP2 Narrative of Project - CF-E Overlay A. SITE REASONS FOR INITIATING APPLICATION: We are proposing a 58 lot Single Family "Planned Fesidtential Development" on 9 . 76 acres (Net) . P.R. D's require reva.ew by city' s Planning Commission. B. AREA DESCRIPTION AND POPULATION SERVED BY THE PROPOSED USE OR PROJECT: We propose to construct. a 58 single family project and ex- pect to sell a majority to local residents who want to move up to a larger, new home and yet remain with the same school, church, friends and recreation facilities . Streets are private. Project is not a gated community . Development is an infill project consisting of 9 . 76 acres of an existing 19 . 2 gross acres, 18 . 49 net acres school site. Bushard School is a closed school which was declared surplus in 1978 . Oka School is an active elementary school which will remain in operation and presently operates a-t 70% capacity. C. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND SERVICES: 1. First floor living space will be raised 1 foot above flooV plain. Foundations will be raised, wood joist with post tension garage, slabs. 2 . HOMES: A) 58 single family residences i City of Huntington Beach Tentative Tract No. 14515 February 4, 1992 Page 2 2 . Homes (Cont'd. ) B) 9 . 76 net land. 10. 15 gross. C) 5 , 000 S. f. minimum lots. 5 . 7 lots per net acre D) Building cover. 24 . 8% maximum. E) Private open space +/- 1200 S. F. minimum each lot or 86 , 238 S. F. total . F) Apprearance is a modern 2 story, California st_Vle ,with cut-up windows, stucco, wood siding and tile roofs . 22 ' to highest plate and 31 ' to highest roof ridge . 3 . PARKING• A) Private enclosed garages = 199 B) Parking in front of garages = 160 C) Parking, street-guest = 115 TOTAL 474 Spaces provided REQUIRED = 174 per code COMMON REACREATION AREA: 1 . Land area = 16, 656 s . f . 2 . Uses: Cabana restroom = 800 s . f . Pool = 600 s . f. Spa = 100 s . f . Tot-lot = 625 s . f . BBQ cooking = 2 each 3 . Entry corridor with hardscape .details and heavy landscaping. LANDSCAPING: 1. All front yards landscaped and maintained by Hommeowmer' s Association, in addition to landscaped pockets. 2 . Minimum of 50-30" box trees and 50-24" box trees. Washingtonia rubostus and coco palms. 3 . Shrub and ground cover for balance of landscaping. �_- City of Huntington Beach Tentative Tract No. 14515 February 4, 1992 Page 3 D. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING USES: NORTH OF SITE: Elementary school Oka School WEST OF SITE: Single family R.1-6000 and Bushard Park SOUTH OF SITE: Medium density multti family condos and rentals with carports . EAST OF SITE: Single family, R1-6000 and R1-5000 E. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION: 1 . Two developer's, neighborhood input meetings were held prior to formally making application to city. All within a 300' radius were invited. On October 9 , 1990, +/-186 people attended. On April 4 , 1991, +/-150 people attended. 28 homeowners signed a petition in favor of proposed project, (copy attached) . 2 . Bushard School Site is a surplus school site which was closed in 1978 . In 1981 a ground lease was signed with the Boy's Club and the City of Huntington Beach for 25 years. The Fountain Valley School District and City of Huntington Beach are relocating Boy' s Club and providing funds. 3 . Development is a 50%-50% joint venture with the Fountain Valley School District and Tumanjan Development . Fountain Valley School District will receive 100% of land value plus will share in 50% of all profits . F. SPECIAL PERMITS: We, the applicant, hereby request special permits for the below-described items. We are requesting your consent on these special permits in order to promote a better living environment for our future residence and the existing neighbors. In conjunction with the planning staff for the City of Huntington Beach, our site plan was amended in order to incorporate planning techniques which maximize the aesthically pleasing types of architecture and land- . scaping. Our site .plan was influenced by a request for public access through our property to an existing City of Huntington Beach Tentative .Tract No. 14515 February 4, 1992 Page 4 F. Permits (Cont'd. ) Bushard park. Additionally, layout was amended in order to provide easy access for children which attend Oka School . The above-mentioned special permits will not be a detrement to the general public or neighborhood nor the city in general. The general health, welfare and safety was taken into consideration in making the request for special permits. We belive that we shall be consistant with the object- of the Planned Residential Development standards in achieving a development adapted to the terrain and compatable with the surrounding environment. This belief is based on the fact that we obtained over 180 local residents' opinions . 1 . Section 9150 . 8 Setback (Side Yard) requires the following setbacks: a. Exterior sideyard - 201 ; plans indicate aninimum 6' - 11 ' . b. Interior sideyard - 101 ; plans indicate mminimim 51 . C. Interior sideyard setback for garages - 101 ; plan indicate minimum 51 . 2 . Section 9150 . 10 Building Separation requires the following setbacks: _ a. Side to side for building exceeding on story - 12 . 5' ; plans indicate minimum 10' separation. b. Accessway and dwelling unit separation -151 ; plans indicate a minimum 10, separation. 3 . Section 9150. 14 Main Recreation Area requires the following setbacks: a. Minimum setback of 201to any dwelling unit; plans indicate a minimum 16' setback. b. A clubhouse facility is required for any project which exceeds 50 units. The plans indicate a 1, 600 square foot cabana with shower and restrooms. City of Huntington Beach . Tentative Tract No. 14515 February 4, 1992 Page 5 Permits (Cont'd. ) . 4 . Section 9150 . 16 Private Access Way requires a minimum paved width equivalent of two (12) twelve foot wide travel lanes; an additional 12 ' side travel lane shall be provided in each direction for the first one hundred feet from the point of intersection with a public street. The plans indicate two (2) twenty feet wide travel lanes. euc.w.n nwa I . III I w Y 1 1 I } L /, R/-S.•® R65tClNf7.,S_OewIGPMeMT ) •• lIRB: �� .q.s.o V a. .lfdr T n.•T S � r�f� u .f�•. 7 ] [[ MRILMII,f1 t ® _ !.�.�, • � o w, m our<,r,a ...� �. .... ( �_ o ) - �1 .G ' � n...mow..,.,..c.w..l. a..o•w.0 �} I e. d SITE PLAN e o � -Roo .BABA. I WHEN- _.MAs BR. _ - � -FAMILY PM" sirmi 1gUND. - l - - _PDR- Bn.Z f .RN O O aooni: / BED ooM 3' SECOND FIRST FLOOR �._ _z RSAR ._. FLOOR Plan One 2075 SQ . FT. Two-Storyrhrer.[irclrocxns,Tivo and One-Half Baths, T%vo-Car Garage. PA PA MAST R BR„ KR _�LNSIG.RM. L' A']. BEDROOM] O� DROO 2 LA 1 / SECOND FLOOR R.CXDR - v. r- Plan Two 2250 lieu-tirorY;lly eelkelroona,Three•Baths, �lirce Car Garage. -,..-vim. _........... � . 'PAno o O ALCO E a I � NOOK � MBA f-- I I %. rFCHE El MASTER BR R _ ° FAMILY RM- l J ♦ �, P• j P _D ING ❑ 1L/�1 1 BA-3_ U I-Dcwp I — uF orery To -� �-- ac ow T .BEDROOM 4� - � BEDROOM�3- �LI RM. w 'f Lrml L UN ; ° .0 BA 2 BEDROOM:. SECOND �� _ ll FIRST FLOOR _ o FLOOR ' �� \• �3 C IR GARAGE -. Plan Three 2500 SQ . F . \Vl 1-�It 11 Y. I t1111111"11' IIII t'l'I,rt'1.It N 1111.•i wit II litmus 1%,mm'-I Inrr NI(h," l hn•t•(';:11 ° PATIO,. - - -`' WA +IAS�R.�R o -FAAUL�,:pM.. 1C1G_ M. Ok w�cN C30c" a ITO ' _ � OfEn To , _•, I _ - . RMEOp sf I' �. BEDROOM 4 O - � � _L1YWG 17M._ L_ n BA-Z 1 W LAl1ND. A3-\� -_ BEOR00M_2 1 _ `\ �:•.1 4. jIII BEDR Ohf3_ --- --_SECO FLOOR -3TAR_GAR E. FIRST —� FLOOR Plan Four 2750 SQ . FT. Two-Scory,Four Bedrooms, Master Bedroorn Suire with Recreat Three Baths,"three Car C_;aroge. ------- .. .. - --- -- -- ,_ '��_ �4'" -- - •ram - f - -------�� '�•- �^- �� O 11 1 Plan One Plan Four Plan Two -Plan Three c fic cove r.ZN'JAN DEVELOPMENT and FOUNTAIN YAI.I.F. SCHOOL UI S'I'R ICT 1 ' I POOL I I I ,p I III - . 1 .�i� � 1 II,, Z• 9 1 � II'I. II z � II O i ♦ 1 'I'I '', j`' «jll 1 �I 1 � I I ICI ;rT I II ill II I r+• T II I l- ill III.+. CABAL. FLOOh•l-0 -- 'LAN +',t ac f lC Cope I, I -- I COMMUNITY PARK and RECREATION AREA FRONT ELEVATION 0 1 11 1 T- LOT POOL �.. P A F'l K \' �' i III•, � - `� .. �' �' �)��\ .L r r �Awifzc Cove _ COMMUNITY PARK and RECREATION AREA . . . ...f; j �TTPCa AM I. ni0 Ne :0 ICI SECTION 13 !1 U I 0 %: 7 r - �rICA ---------- i----a -DUC- 77 'r- A G (D > t-0 all 0 7 z 0 7- —7 1A -4� U4. 2 533L Z "AL FLOOD ZONE 0- 0 DEPTH OF 0-3 _j < '0 �R PARCEL 5N �7 - REMLIND 99 Z , �—� O� '2 r T"4 Wl T-QAL�KCIgFL z V I' :� \ -� I / - ! o :�L > w i.�z CL u 4 UJ d uj z 00 Iff I p'II tI �., _/ 0- 7 u �qltTC' 8 I B — OF 111CT. - Al TISSETT _(ANE e N + ci i / I of 1 3: 1.00 I- i CITY OF HUNTINGTON .BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Herb Fauland From Jul 'y Osugi Assistant Planner Assrntant Planner Subject ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Date December 26 , 1991 FORM NO. 91-15 Applicant : Tumanjan/Fountain Valley Partners Request : To subdivide a 19 . 2 acre school site (containing the Oka School and vacant Bushard School) into a 10 . 4 acre , 58 unit Single Family Planned Residential Development and a 8 . 8 acre site for the Oka School . The project also involves a zone change to add a -PD (Planned Development Suffix) to existing R1 (Low Density Residential) Zoning . Location : 19699 Education Lane (Bushard School Site) Background Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment form noted above and has determined that a negative declaration may be filed for the project . In view of this , a draft negative declaration was prepared and was published in the Huntington Beach Independent for a thirty (30) day public review period commencing Thursday, December 19 , 1991 and ending Wednesday, January 17 , 1992 . If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration are received, you will be notified immediately. Recommendation The Environmental Assessment Committee recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No . 91-15 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment . Mitigation Measures X The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resulting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval . JO: 1 p =" (1711d) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-15 1 . Name of Proponent: Tumanjan/Fountain Valley Partners Address: 15901 Hawthorne Blvd. , Ste 210 Lawndale, CA 90260 Phone Number: (213)214-5162 2. Date Checklist Submitted for Review: 3. Concurrent Entitlement(s): Zone Change No. 91-3, Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 and Tentative Tract Map No. 14515. 4. Project Location: 19699 Education Lane (Bushard School Site) 5. Project Description: A request to subdivide the 19.2 acre school site which is currently occupied by the vacant Bushard School and the Oka School into a 10.4 acre, 58 unit single family planned residential development on the Bushard School property and a 8.8 acre parcel for the Oka School . The project also involves a zone change to add a PD (Planned Development Suffix) to the existing RI (low density residential) zoning. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of answers are included after each subsection.) Yes Abe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? _ - X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over-covering of the soil? X _ Discussion: Some land form modification is anticipated in association with the development of the site which will inevitably result in disruption, displacement, compaction, and over-covering of soil . The project proposes approximately 5,000 cubic yards of. grading. The maximum height after grading will not exceed five (5) feet. Grade impacts will be addressed through standard conditions of approval which require submittal of grading plans and a hydrology study. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Yes Maybe NQ Long—Term: Development of 58 single family homes on 10.4 acres of primarily vacant land will result in an increase in air pollutant emissions; however, projected emissions are well below threshold levels (significant emission levels) for pollutant emissions, as identified in the Air Quality Handbook, prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to have any significant adverse impacts. b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ _ X C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change i6 climate, either locally or regionally? _ _ X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X Discussion: The proposed project will result in 62% coverage of the site with impervious surfaces (30% building coverage, 32% paving) . A preliminary hydrology study indicates that the increase in impervious surfaces will decrease absorption and increase runoff by approximately 2% which is not considered significant. In addition, the proposed project includes the installation of drainage systems to accommodate the additional runoff. The project will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require submittal of hydrology and hydraulic studies to verify that the runoff generated by the proposed project will not adversely impact existing drainage systems and adjacent properties. No significant adverse drainage impacts are anticipated. C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X Discussion: The proposed project is located in zone AE 14 and AD D3 of the floodplain. Development of the project, may alter the course of flood flows in the area. However, the project will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require the submittal of hydrology and hydraulic studies to insure that the proposed project will not have a significantly adverse impact on flood flows on adjacent properties. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? _ _ X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including . but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ _ X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ _ X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _ X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X Discussion: The proposed project will generate a demand for approximately 36,540 gallons of water per day and based upon City of Huntington Beach Water Department water usage factors will result in an additional burden to the City's existing water'system which currently does not meet peak hour demand. However, through implementation of standard conditions of approval which require use of water conserving fixtures, drought Environmental Checklist —3— (0174d) Yes Maybe No d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ _ X Discussion (a—d) : The project site is a former school site and does not appear to support any unique animal species. No significant adverse animal impacts are anticipated. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X _ b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X _ _ Discussion (a—b) : The proposed project will allow for development of 58 single family homes on an abandoned school site. Construction and occupancy of the single family homes will increase.noise levels in the area. Construction noise is short—term and will be subject to standard conditions of approval restricting construction activities to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. The site is located adjacent to an existing school ; construction activity noise may impact school operations. However, the closest school structures are located more than 220 feet from the northern property line of the site. Students may be exposed to construction related noise during recess as the site is located to the south of existing field areas, but no significant adverse classroom impacts are anticipated. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Discussion: The proposed project will allow for development of 58 single family homes on an abandoned school site. Occupancy of the homes will increase light and glare produced by the site. However the surrounding areas are developed in a manner similar to the proposed project; therefore the project's contribution to cumulative light impacts is not considered significant. Furthermore, the project will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring submittal of a lighting plan to insure that exterior lighting will not spill on to adjacent properties. No significant adverse impact is anticipated. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X Discussion: The project site is an abandoned school site which was closed in 1978. The site is currently used by the Boy's Club; the lease for the Boy's Club is currently being negotiated with the Fountain Valley School District. The proposed project, however, will eliminate the school facilities and will allow for development of 58 single family homes. Although the project will result in a change in existing use, the proposed development is consistent with the existing low density residential General Plan designation and underlying Rl (low density residential) zoning and surrounding residential development. The —PD (Planned Development suffix) requested under Zone Change 91-3 will allow for development of a low density planned development and is not considered to be a substantial alteration to the existing underlying zoning. No significant adverse impact is anticipated. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? _ X b. Substantial depletion of any non—renewable natural resource? _ X Discussion (a—b) : The proposed project will result in increases of fuel/energy usage in the City; however, anticipated energy demands created by the construction and occupancy of 58 single family homes are within parameters of the overall projected demand which is planning to be met in the area. No significant increase in the rate of depletion or usage is anticipated. Environmental Checklist —5— (0174d) Yes Maybe No c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? X Discussion: See 13a. d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ X Discussion: The project proposes to provide two access routes; one access way extends through Constitution Drive westerly into the project site. The other is a continuation of Garrett Circle and connects the project site to Brookhurst Street. e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? _ X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _ X _ Discussion: The proposed project will introduce approximately 554 trips in the vicinity of an operating school facility. The increased traffic may create additional hazards to students who walk or bicycle to school . However, there is currently a crossing guard at .Yorktown Avenue and Brigantine Lane, immediately in front of the school site and one at Yorktown and Bushard to the east of the school . No significant adverse impact is anticipated. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ X_- b. Police protection? _ _ X Discussion (a—b): No additional fire or police manpower or facilities will be required to serve the proposed project. C. Schools? X Discussion: The proposed project site is a former school site which was closed in 1978. Development of the project will eliminate a school site and will generate approximately 17 elementary and 8 high school students (based upon Fountain Valley Elementary and Huntington Beach Union High School District student generation factors) . The site is located adjacent to the Oka Elementary School which is currently operating at 70% of its capacity. There are currently nine other school sites, in the City of Huntington Beach, that are within one mile of the project site, Of these 4 are currently closed. The project vicinity is .primarily built out. Although recycling is anticipated to occur over the long—term andmay increase existing enrollment levels, due to the number of closed school sites which can be refurbished and reopened, elimination of the Bushard School site is not anticipated to result in a significant adverse impact to school services in the area. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X Discussion: The project is located adjacent to Oka School (which has some athletic fields) and Bushard Park and has proposed providing pedestrian access to the Park. In addition the project includes recreational facilities (pool , spa, children's play area). No additional recreational facilities are needed to serve the site. For discussion on the impacts associated with the loss of recreational facilities, see item #19. Environmental Checklist -7— (0174d) Yes Maybe N4 f. Solid waste and disposal? _ _ X Discussion: Solid waste disposal is currently provided by Rainbow DisposHl who has indicated that existing solid waste and disposal facilities can adequately accommodate the additional trash generated by the proposed project. No additional manpower or equipment will be required to serve the site. No significant adverse impact is anticipated. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ _ X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _ X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X Discussion: The existing school facilities are used by the Huntington Beach Boy's Club. Construction of the proposed project will eliminate the Boy's Club Facilities. However, the Huntington Beach Boy's Club has recently constructed new facilities on Delaware Street. 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ _ X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? _ _ X C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? _ _ X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? _ _ X Discussion: The project site is not located in the vicinity of any known archaeological or cultural resources. No significant impact is anticipated. 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sub— stantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X Environmental Checklist —9— (0174d) RECOMMENDED MITIGATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-15 IMPACT MITIGAT,MN 1 . The proposed project will .generate a demand 1 . Maintain current water level of servic=- by of approximately 36,540 gfallons of water complying with water system improvements per day and will result in an additional contained in the City's Water Master Plan and burden to the City's water system, specific Water Department recommendati•uns. Compliance shall be demonstrated prior to occupancy of the first unit of the tract. 2. Development of the residences will result 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits, _-plans in the loss of Several mature trees on site. depicting the location, type, size, an.14 quantity of all existing plant material which w=:11 be removed or relocated as a result of th.,� project shall be submitted to the Departments ref Community Development and Public Works . Environmental Checklist —11— (0174d) City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building 536-5241 Planning 536-5271 Housing 536-5271 February 5 , 1992 Subject : RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-15 (SCH. 91121054)/CONSTRUCTION OF A 58 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE To Interested Parties : Thank you for taking the time to review and comment .on Mitigated Negative Declaration No . 91-15 which analyzes the potential impacts of the project described below: Project Title : Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No . 91-15 in conjunction with Zone Change No . 91-3 , Conditional Use Permit No . 91-25 and Tentative Tract No . 14515 . Project Description : A request to subdivide the 19 . 2 acre school site which is currently occupied by the vacant Bushard School and the Oka School into a 10 . 4 acre, 58 unit single - family planned residential development on the Bushard School property and a 8 . 8 acre parcel for the Oka School . The project also involves a zone change to add a PD (Planned Development Suffix) to the existing R1 ( low density residential) zoning . Project Location : 19699 Education Lane (Bushard School Site) in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange . Project Applicant : Tumanjan/Fountain Valley Partners February 7, 1992 Page Two The City of Huntington Beach has prepared the responses to comments received on the document . Pursuant to State Law, copies of the draft mitigated negative declaration and response to comments have been enclosed for your review. - The project is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission on February 19 , 1992 . If you have any questions , please contact me at (714) 536-5271 . Sincerely, J lie Osugi Assistant Planner Attachments - Negative Declaration No . 91-15 1 . Initial Study 2 . Response to Comments JO : lp ( 1393D) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-15 I . INTRODUCTION This document serves as the Response to Comments on the Draft Negative Declaration No . 91-15 . This document contains all information available in the public record related to the Draft Negative Declaration as of January 22 , 1992 and responds to comments in accordance with Section 15088 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines . 'This document contains five sections . In addition to this Introduction, these sections are Public Participation and Review, Comments , Responses to Comments , Errata to the Draft Negative Declaration, and Appendix . The Public Participation section outlines the methods the City of Huntington Beach has used to provide public review and solicit input on the Draft Negative Declaration . The Comments section contains those written comments received from agencies , groups , organizations , and individuals as of January 22 , 1992 . The Response to Comments section contains individual responses to each comment . It is the intent of the City of Huntington Beach to include this document in the official public record related to the Draft Negative Declaration . B.ased on the information contained in the public record the decision-makers will be provided with an accurate and complete record of all information related to the environmental consequences of the project . II . PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND REVIEW The City of Huntington Beach notified all responsible and interested agencies and interested groups , organizations , and individuals that a Draft Negative Declaration had been prepared for the proposed project . The City also used several methods . to solicit input during the review period for the preparation of the Draft Negative Declaration . The following is a list of actions taken during the preparation, distribution, and review of the Draft Negative Declaration . 1 . A cover letter and copies of the Draft Negative Declaration were filed with the State Clearinghouse on December 18 , 1991 . The State Clearinghouse assigned Clearinghouse Number 91121054 to the proposed project . A copy of the cover letter and the State Clearinghouse distribution list is available for review and inspection at the City of Huntington Beach, Planning Department , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92548 . 2 . An official thirty ( 30) day public review period for the Draft Negative Declaration was established by the State Clearinghouse . It began on December 18 , 1991 and ended on January 17 , 1992 . Public comment letters were accepted by the City of Huntington Beach through January 22 , 1992 . 3 . Notice of the Draft Negative Declaration was published on the Huntington Beach Independent on December 26 , 1991 . Upon request , copies of the document were distributed to agencies , groups , organizations , and individuals . III . COMMENTS Copies of all written comments received as of January 22 , 1992 are contained in Appendix A of this document . All comments have been numbered and are listed on the following pages . All comments from letters received have been retyped verbatim in a comment-response format for clarity . Responses to Comments for each comment which raised an environmental issue are contained in this document . IV. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The Draft Negative Declaration No . 91-15 was distributed to responsible agencies , interested groups , organizations , and individuals . The report was made available for public review and comment for a period of thirty (30) days . The public review period for the Draft Negative Declaration established by the State Clearinghouse commenced on December 18 , 1991 and expired on January 17 , 1992 . The City of Huntington Beach accepted comment letters through January 22 , 1992 . Copies of all documents received as of January 22 , 1992 are contained in Appendix A of this report . Comments have been numbered with responses correspondingly numbered . Responses are presented for each comment which raised a significant environmental issue . Several comments do not address the completeness or adequacy of the Draft Negative Declaration, do not raise significant environmental issues , or request additional information . A substantive response . to such comments is not appropriate within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . Such comments are responded to with a "comment acknowledged" reference . This indicates that the comment will be forwarded to all appropriate decision makers for their review and consideration. Negative Declaration No . 91-15 -2- (2236d) DOT-1 • Comment Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Tentative Tract Map No . 14515 , 58 lot proposed single family subdivision . The proposed development will not cause any adverse impact to the State transportation net work surrounding the community. Response: Comment noted and forwarded to decision makers for consideration prior to action on the proposed project . DOT-2 • Comment Caltrans is concerned with the cumulative impact of developments and its relationship to the City' s traffic circulation and the State fa,cilities . Appropriate mitigation measures to reduce the adverse traffic impacts should be .considered . Response : The City ' s Traffic Impact Fee , identified in the discussion under item 13a page 6 of the checklist , was developed as a means to offset development projects ' contribution toward cumulative traffic impacts . The fee is assessed based .upon $75 per trip generated and is used to fund traffic improvements required to maintain adequate levels of service at buildout of the City under the existing general plan . The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan designation on the site . Therefore , the cumulative traffic impacts of the project can be adequately offset by exaction of the traffic impact .fee and implementation of the improvements it funds . DOT-3 - Comment : Once again, thank you for the opportunity to voice Caltrans concerns on this project . If we may be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact Nathaniel H. Pickett , ( 714 ) 724-2247 . Negative Declaration No . 91-15 -3- (2236d) Response : Comment .does not request any additional information or pertain to the adequacy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No further response is warranted . HBEB-l : Comment : A subcommittee of the Board met on site and reviewed environmental assessment #91-15 . It was the conclusion of the subcommittee, concurred in by the Executive Board Members , that the following changes in environmental assessment #91-15 should be made . Response : Comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decision makers . Please refer to HBEB-2 - HBEB-10 responses . HBEB-2 : Comment : The change in the topography caused by elevating the site 0-3 feet will cause an adverse impact on adjacent property. owners and cause the recreational area of the remaining school site to be a collecting point for drain off waters . Response : The proposed elevation of the property is required to comply with Federal Flood Insurance Program development standards . In addition , these standards require that elevation be accomplished in a manner that flood flows and drainage on to surrounding properties will not be significantly impacted as verified through submittal of hydrology/hydraulic studies . HBEB-3 • Comment : The Maybe should be changed to Yes . Response: Comment noted . Response will be revised to "Yes" . See HBEB-3 on Errata . Negative Declaration No . 91-15 -4- (2236d) HBEB-4 • Comment : The discussion points out that the additional water demand will be an additional burden to the City' s existing water system which -currently does not meet current peak hour demands . There is no indicator as to what the cumulative effect of these additional gallons of water will impose upon the water system. Therefore, this should be taken into account with all prior impacts on the system by approvals above the current capacity of the system. Response : Like the traffic impact fee study, the City ' s Water Master Plan identifies water system improvements necessary to maintain adequate levels of service under projected buildout under the existing general plan. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan . Therefore , through implementation of appropriate water master plan improvements , as required by. the mitigation measure identified under item 3h on page 4 of the checklist , both project specific and cumulative effects of the development have been mitigated . HBEB-5 : Comment : The Maybe should be changed to Yes . Response : Comment noted . Response will be revised to "Yes" . See HBEB-5 on Errata . HBEB-6 - Comment :. The discussion indicates the proposed project will increase traffic and have an adverse effect on an already overloaded intersection . . . Adams Avenue and Brookhurst Street . The mitigation would provide that Adams and Brookhurst would each have .to have a lane widening to bring it into compliance by City standards . Response : Comment restates information provided under item 13a page 6 of the checklist and does not warrant any further response . Negative Declaration No . 91-15 -5- (2236d) HBEB-7: Comment • The proposal to impose a "Traffic Impact Fee" does not resolve. the problem. It is in fact "payoff" . There is no indication when or if the intersection will be upgraded as recommended . Response : Please refer to DOT-2 response . HBEB-8 : Comment : Additionally, there is no indication as to the amount of funds collected in the past towards this upgrading . Another concern is whether or not the fee so collected are put in trust fund for this purpose . If not , how are, they handled? Response : The City Traffic Division conducted a study to identify traffic improvements needed to maintain adequate levels of service based on buildout of the City under the proposed general plan . The Traffic Division then calculated the projected cost of all improvements and divided the total by the projected number of trips generated by buildout development . City council approved a traffic impact fee at 50% of the projected cost per trip with the stipulation that the City will match the fees collected to cover traffic impacts resulting from existing development . The fees collected are deposited into the general fund and are not marked toward any specific improvement . HBEB-9 : Comment : Should be changed from a Maybe to a Yes . Response : Comment noted . Response. will be revised to "Yes" . See HBEB-9 on Errata . HBEB-10 • Comment : The discussion affirms that there may be an additional hazard because of increased traffic in the area . Since this is already a substandard street , there will be a significant adverse impact . The Maybe should be changed to Yes . Negative Declaration No 91-15. -6- (2236d) Response: Comment noted and will be forwarded to decision makers for consideration prior to action on the proposed project . Response will be revised to "Yes" . See HBEB-10 on Errata . CIWMB-1 : Comment : In order to help decision-makers , 1) identify potential impacts from construction and demolition projects , 2) determine whether any such impacts are significant , and 3 ) ascertain whether significant impacts can be mitigated to a level of insignificance, CIWMB staff request that the final ND include the following information: Response : Comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by the appropriate decision makers . Please refer to CIWMB 2-9 responses . CIWMB-2 : Comment : Identification of the final disposal sites ( s) for the project ' s anticipated waste generation . Response : The project has not been approved, as such, no contractor has been selected to demolish the existing school facilities . Therefore, it is not known which landfill facilities contractors will be used to dispose of demolition materials . The city cannot legally require that the contractor dispose of the waste materials at an specific site . Once occupied, waste generated by the site would be collected by the Rainbow Disposal Company which provides waste disposal service to the City of Huntington Beach . The Rainbow Disposal Company uses Bee Canyon Landfill in Irvine California as a final disposal site . CIWMB-3 : Comment : Identification of the anticipated types and quantities of solid wastes to be generated upon implementation of the plan; both during construction phases and at the project completion . Negative Declaration No . 91-15 -7- (2236d) i 1 Response • Waste materials will predominantly consist of paper, plastics , glass , metals , green waste and non-paper waste . Rainbow Disposal estimates total rubbish per single family house per week at approximately 99 pounds . Utilizing this generation rate of 99 pounds per unit per week the proposed project is estimated to generate approximately 5 , 742 pounds of solid waste per week. This equates to 184 . 3 tons of solid waste per year . Additionally, waste generation for the City contained in the Draft Source Reduction and Recycling Element , according to the Orange County Solid Waste Management Department are as follows : Residential - 155 , 625 tons per year (TPY) , Commercial - 52 , 220 TPY, Industrial - 140 , 374 TPY. A more detailed breakdown of waste generation rates is not available at this time . CIWMB-4 Comment : Identification of the potential impacts of these quantities on remaining landfill capacities and the calculated site-life associated thereof . Response : Bee Canyon landfill located in Irvine has a projected lifespan of 25-30 years . No significant impacts to this or landfill or other solid waste disposal services are anticipated . CIWMB-5 Comment : Identification of any past or present areas of unpermitted landfilling and/or waste dumping at the project site and how these areas will be mitigated . Response : The project site is occupied by a vacated school site and does not show any signs of use as a waste dumping site . CIWMB-6 Comment : Future residential developments may increase the generation of waste being sent to landfills . To minimize the amount of solid waste going into landfills , Board staff recommends that the following measures be considered in the final ND. Negative Declaration No . 91-15 -8- (2236d) Response: Comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by the appropriate decision makers . Please refer to CIWMB-7-9 responses . CIWMB-7 Comment : Implementation of a recycling program in the new development area ( s) . Response : The City recently approved a Conditional Use Permit for a Materials Recovery Facility which will allow for collection point separation of recyclable materials . All separation would occur 'at the transfer station operated by Rainbow Disposal and would allow for 100% participation . In the interim all separation currently takes place manually with full automation anticipated by the middle of 1993 . With implementation of the MRF, no additional recycling programs would be necessary. CIWMB-8 Comment : Promote the use of insulation and other products made of recycled materials in the construction of buildings and other structures . Response : Comment noted and has been forwarded to decision makers for inclusion as a condition of approval on the project . The condition of approval will read as follows : 1 . Prior to issuance of building permits , the use of insulation and other products made of recycled materials for building construction shall be promoted . CIWMB-9 Comment : Promote the inclusion of waste recycling and collection storage areas into the design of the project . Response : Please refer to CWWMB-7 response . Negative Declaration No . 91-15 -9- (2236d) Response : Comment noted . Comment does not . refer to the adequacy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration; therefore, no further response is warranted . CIW IB-10 Comment : Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject project . If you have any questions regarding these comments , please call Leandro Ramos of the Board ' s Waste Generation Analysis and Environmental Assessment Branch at (916) 255-2332 . Response : Comment noted . Negative Declaration No . 91-15 -10- (2236d) APPENDIX A Negative Declaration No . 91=15 -11- (2236d) , STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANS 'ATION AGENCY' ( PETE-WILSOW Goveihor DEPACZTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION." " R. ` r`; �" " ' , JDI _ rF DISTRICT 12 2501 PULLMAN STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92705 December 19, 1.�9 YV �I. !GIs . .1_ri .jE' Osuq.i F1L�- ATSD/ T-!' NAP City of Huntingt,;r; 3each SCH4 : NONE !:1e-par trnen t of Community Development P . M. : ORA-39-2. 62 2000 Main Street Hontington Beach , CA 9264E SUBJECT : Fifty Eight Lot Proposed Single Family Subdivision Dear. Ns . lsi_rgi : Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Tentative -(rart I1la_, 1\10 . 1.4515 , `,a for proposed single family DOT_1 s ibdivisi.on . (f;e pr:_.;�ose:J cevelOpment wil 1 not cause an,y adverse .impact to the Stat-.e transportation net work surrounding the community . Caltrans is concerned with the curnulative impact of developments and its relationship to the City s traffic circulation DOT-2 and the State facilities . Appropriate mitigation measures to reduce the adverse traffic impacts should be considered . Once again , thank you for the opportunity to voice Caltrans Concerns on this project . 1f we may be of further assistance , do DOT-' not: hesitate to cor-rtact 1Ja1-haniel H . Pickett , 714 S ^.c�rel u; s -tobert F . o, eph , Chief Advanced Planning Branch cc : David Cordova , Traffic OPS ; CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Review Board To: Julie Osugi, Assistant Planner From: Environmental Board Subject: Draft Negative Declaration 91-15 Request: Subdivide a 19.2 acre school site into a 10.4 acre 58-unit single family planned residential development and an 8.8 acre site. Project involves a zone change. A subcommittee of the Board met on site and reviewed environmental assessment #91-15. It was the conclusion of the subcommittee, concurred in by the Executive Board Members, that -' the following changes in environmental assessment #91-15 should be made: lc. Earth. The change in the topography caused by elevating the site 0-3 feet will cause an adverse impact on adjacent property owners and cause the recreational area of the remaining school site to be a collecting point for drain off waters. p J The Maybe should be changed to Yes. ' 3h. Water. The discussion points out that the additional water demand will be an additional burden to the City's existing water system which currently does not meet current peak hour demands. There is no indicator as to what the cumulative effect of these additional ,. ,�n :-3, 4 gallons of water will impose upon the water system. Therefore,this should be taken into account with all prior impacts on the system by approvals above the current capacity of the system. The Maybe should be changed to .Yes. I t� r r:-Q1 13a. Transportation. The discussion indicates the proposed project will increase traffic and have an adverse effect on an already overloaded intersection... Adams Avenue and Brookhurst Street. The mitigation would provide that Adams and Brookhurst would each have to have a lane widening to bring it into compliance by City Standards. The proposal to impose a "Traffic Impact Fee" does not resolve the problem. It is in fact "payoff". There is no indication when 17nrB-7 or if the intersection will be upgraded as recommended. Additionally, there is no indication as to the amount of funds collected in the past towards this upgrading. Another concern is .t T T E� B-9 whether on not the fee so collected are put in a trust fund for this purpose. If not, how are they handled? 13d. Should be changed from a Maybe to a Yes. See discussion under I1T:,Er-9 13A. 13f. The discussion affirms that there may be an additional hazard because of increased traffic in the.area. Since this is already a JTnrj>_ n substandard street, there will be a significant adverse impact. The Maybe should be changed to Yes. The committee and the Board look forward to receiving your comments on the above items. III�T1-3- Chairman Charles Montano Committee - William G. Linehan Norman Smith State of California Environmental Protection Agency Memorandum To I Tom Loftus Date: January 15, 1992 State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 'l D r• !S✓ Julie Osugi City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 n- From George Larson, upervisor Waste Generation Analysis and Environmental Assessment Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board Subject: SCH #91121054 , Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Tumanjan/Fountain Valley Partners, City of Huntington Beach, Orange County PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is to subdivide the 19 . 2 acre school site which is currently occupied by the vacant Bushard School and the Oka School into a 10 . 4 acre, 58 unit single family planned residential development on the Bushard School property and a 8 . 8 acre parcel for the Oka School . The project also involves a zone change to add a PD (Planned Development Suffix) to the existing RI (low density residential) zoning. California Integrated Waste Management Board (Board) staff has reviewed the NOP for the document cited above and offer the following comments: In consideration of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , Section 15205 (c) , Board staff will comment on specific. issues involving waste generation and disposal. In order to help decision-makers 1) identify potential impacts from construction and demolition .projects, 2) determine whether any such impacts are significant, and 3) ascertain whether CINMB-1 significant impacts can be mitigated to a level of insignificance, Board staff request that the final Negative Declaration (ND) include the following information: A. ) Identification of the final disposal, site (s) for the ICIWMB-2 Tumanjan/Fountain Valley Partners January 15, 1992 Page 2 of 2 rPJIWB-2 project' s anticipated waste generation. cont..-' B. ) Identification of the anticipated types and quantities of solid wastes to be generated upon implementation of CI -7MB the project; both during construction phases and at the project's completion. C. ) Identification of the potential impacts of these quantities on remaining landfill capacities and the CIWMB-4 calculated landfill site-life. D. ) Identification of any past or present areas of unpermitted landfilling and/or waste dumping at the CIWMB-5 project site and how these areas will be mitigated. Future residential developments may increase the generation of waste being sent to landfills. To minimize the amount of solid waste going into. landfills, Board staff recommends . that the CIWMB-6 following measures be considered in the final ND: A. ) Implementation of a recycling program in the new ICDJMB-7 development area (s) . B. ) Promote the use of insulation and other products made of recycled materials in the construction of buildings CIiIMB=8 and other structures . C. ) Promote the inclusion of waste recycling and collection) storage areas into the design of the project. Cltdt9B-9 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject project. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please- call CINMB-li Leandro Ramos of the Board' s Waste Generation Analysis and Environmental Assessment Branch at (916) 255-2332 . "Preparing Today's Youth For Tomorrow- F-0UNTAIN VALLEY S CEO OL, /yam I .STRI l 72 l l� O:�k �trcct, F��unr-,in Valley, CA �)Z/08 (t 14) 843-3200 Decemb('r 12 , 1991 Hal Simmons Senior Planner Department of Community Development CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main St . Huntington Beach , Calif . 92648 Dear Hal : In compliance with your request for information on the Bushard project , I have included the following . The Fountain Valley School. District currently operates three schools in the City of Huntington Beach . o OKA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL , 9800 Yorktown Avenue , E-luntington 3each Enrollment: 640 students o NEWLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL , 8787 Dolphin Street , IluntingLon Beach Enrollment : 381 o TALBERT MIDDLE SCHOOL, 9101 Brabham Drive , Huntington Beach Enrollment : 590 Both Oka and Newland are ".feeder" schools to Talbert . When the FOUntain Va.l.lcy School District peaked in enrollment at nearly 1_2 , 000 students , �...i-i.c.. (A j.J trict operated six sehc)cls in the City Gf lli.a:itin tc n 'l'h-Z: school district declined to 5700 students by 1988 , during which time the Following school were closed : o WARDLOW SCHOOL, 9191 Pioneer Drive , Huntington Beach o AREVALOS SCHOOL, 19692 Lexington Lane , Huntington Beach o LAMB SCHOOL, 10251 Yorktown , Huntington Beach The district has experienced two consecutive years of moderate growth . The most recent a 2 . 58% increase was experienced this year . The Board of Trustees approved a preliminary enrollment projection that includes a 2 . 2% growth for 1992-93 . The enrollment projection report addressed the need for a facility use study and a boundary reassessment . CONTINUED Hal Simmons December 12 , 1991 page 2 If the district continues to grow beyond our capacity, the Board of Trustees reserves the option to reopen Wardlow and Arevalos as additional school sites . The funds from the School Assets Project , which includes the sale of Bushard and the development of 58 single family homes , will be used to meet the deferred maintenance needs of our schools , major capital outlay projects and the funding of educational programs for our students . The bcnefit from the sale is a public benefit that will serve our community and the students of the Fountain Valley School District . Sincerely, c' Flare Ecker , Ph . D. Assistant to the Superintendent jh TUMANJAN/FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAR ERS, L.P. III 15"1 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210 I AWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260 (310) 214.5162 February 7, 1992 VIA FAX ORUGINAL10 BE M.ML Herb Fouland Assistant Planner City of Huntington Beach 2800 Main Street Huntington Beach, (:A 92648 RE: Tentative Tract 14515 1%99 Education Lane Huntington Beach, CA Low and Moderate Housing Dear Mr. Fauland: We wish to go on record as apposed to Low and Moderate,Housing at our proposed 58 Single Family Residential Development. We understand that a low and moderate housing policy has et to be approved by the City of Huntington Beach and possibly may never be approved. Very truly yours, JAN"UNTAIN VALLEY PARTNERS, L.P. III Peter A. Delgado Director of Construction PAD:paa cc: Michael Tumanjan Mm Ecker John Necarsulmer ATTACHMENT NO, 11 ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS FOR DENIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-25 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS/ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 14515/ ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-3 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 91-25: 1. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed 58 unit planned residential development with eight (8) special permits does not properly adapt the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. The access to the project, the detached single family dwellings and the building height and bulk are not compatible with the adjacent structures and uses. 2 . The proposed 58 unit planned residential development with eight (8) special permits is not compatible with surrounding properties in terms of architecture and orientation. The detached Single Family Dwelling layout, building bulk and building height are not properly addressed through design implementation. 3 . The access to and parking for the proposed 58 unit planned residential development with eight (8) special permits does create an undue traffic problem. The access point for the project and the minimum code required parking provides poor on-site and off-site traffic circulation and inadequate parking. 4 . The planned residential development for a 58 unit project with eight (8) special permits generally does not conform to the provisions contained in Article 915. 5. Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 for a 58 unit planned residential development with eight (8) special permits is not consistent with the goals and objectives of the City' s General Plan and Land Use Map designation. The intent of the land use designation and zoning suffix (PD) is to provide a better living environment and promote aesthetically pleasing development. As proposed the project does not provide an improved and aesthetic living environment. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - SPECIAL_ PERMITS: 1. The following special permits do not promote a better living environment by adapting the Planned Residential Development requirements which would enhance the area and provide a compatible project with the surrounding area: a) reduction of the minimum exterior sideyard; b) reduction of the interior sideyard setback; c) reduction of the interior sideyard setback for garages; d) reduced side to side building separation; e) reduced accessway and building separation; f) reduced setback between main recreation area and a dwelling unit; g) permit a cabana in lieu of a clubhouse facility; and h) reduction of the required private accessway requirement. 2 . The requested special permits do not provide for maximum use of aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, landscaping, design and detached single family dwelling building layout. 3 . The requested special permits will be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience, and detrimental and injurious to the value of property and improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general. The building bulk, building height and circulation have not been properly addressed and will be a detriment to the surrounding neighborhood. -4 . The requested special permits are not consistent with the objectives of the Planned Residential Development standards in achieving a development adapted to the terrain and compatible with the surrounding environment. The proposed detached single family residential project does not provide a better living environment and an aesthetically pleasing project through design implementation. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 14515: 1. The size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design features of the proposed subdivision for a 58 unit planned residential development with eight (8) _ special permits are not in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the supplemental City Subdivision ordinance. The subdivision as proposed for condominium purposes is not properly designed to the zoning designation and planned residential development suffix by the use of land planning techniques and the use of aesthetically pleasing architecture, landscaping, site layout and design. -2- (2904d) 2. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time that the General Plan designation of Low Density 'Residential (7 units per gross acre) and R1 zoning were implemented. However, as designed the subdivision is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 3 . The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the proposed planned residential density of six and one half (6-1/2) units per gross acre. The proposed subdivision for single family residential purposes of a 58 unit planned residential development with eight (8) special permits is not designed properly. 4 . Tentative Tract No. 14515 for a 58 unit planned residential development with special permits is not consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. The project does not provide a better living environment through proper land planning techniques. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO, 91-3: 1. The proposed zone change from R1 (Low Density Residential) to R1-PD (Low Density Residential-Planned Development) and remove the CF-E (Community Facilities-Education) overlay does not conform with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 2 . The proposed zone change from R1 '(Low Density Residential) to R1-PD (Low Density Residential-Planned Development) and remove the CF-E (Community Facilities-Education) overlay is not consistent with surrounding and existing land uses . -3- (2904d) Irockway,City Clerk �'� Huntington Beath <'"; ::a .. �rF9 - of the City Clerk Al It `, '.O. Box 190 on Beach, CA 92648 r•; {' n ' O 1 JNTING Tp :1.9792 C:(:)vervt:hy Laryc//•:�� ) t `M(OR iOq�)fO �F I••I(.(�'�'�.�.rt(J'I.CJI'1 A��,4��(::I� C il••1(7t'�(:)4(:)....lt•2.:)/ Q AUNTY cap LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING _ckway,City Clerk - - rntington Beach r•�x.+� �� : e� ` •,` the City Clerk ' I.BOX 190 r-n Fti+•a'l' �•e a (•F�w AM 9 �;� +�P. _ .f; I 7 1! Beach,CA 92648 iI r��•, I t ,tNGTp :xm:i.7.:i:rat_ I'rai�;(:rti l y 1.9796 IRYOgq)FG _ AF9 I..I(.u't'l'.:i.rtcl'L ��\I epy n� h C(19 64b--c}221. 1 1909.F•� y\�O ITY Ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING a Connie Brockway,City Clerk - CityofHuntingtonBeach • tyit. �' e.-Office of the City Clerk P.O.Box 190 v „� ,ll, �•'I 9'1' 'I / S ; Huntington Beach,CA 92649 i. OK AF'I,I: 153-413---0.4 r;l� SlAzanne M' ;Dayton 19757 Claremont-Lane TING IpP Huntingtn 1301:C:A92646•-4220 Q� ,.a•ro..r,� �<P �•..4 9 � c ppUN.TY 6p LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING 3 ,... Iltlttttl,Itlltttlttltll,ttittlttltl•tltlllttt,ltltl _ Connie Brockway,City Clerk - -- - ........-. . City of Huntington Beach .� Office of the City Clerk 1 1�i-•S IN T � _-- s P.O.Box 190 v.•r r, r., _t� .-;_ _ .. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ❑MOVED,LEFT NO DRDEII []INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS Resident-. C....,,., OATTEMPTED,UMND" 9893 Coton peach-ution C y646 Huntington Beach.-CA_:9 JRfHD SUCH NUMBERTING - " y 92646.4636 o 9 �'"" HUNTINGTON BEACH CA - r m .. ...... `oe c�ppUNTY tp�E LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING II,I..,,ItI,II,t,1.•1•II,,,•11„dl.,,l..11•,I.,,1.11 _ Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 4. Z. it i P.O.Box 190 t n. E ! ,.. ( P-1 9 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 1'i •^• `•%.i':. F:1 li 9�" �\ - i I CK APN: 9.33-39-231 r 1 Michael. Wing, 0120•-1) Suri.li.ne Dr. q/r1 O��pNTING TpyB Huntington Beach CA92646-2075 ,...'3•:..'i;' .. IJINU A MOVED LEFT NO ADO ES UHA6I-'i TO MRUAF:D yCF ''•.e,,. `�<<O RETURN TO SENDER ppUNTY tp LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING - -� Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach f Office of the City Clerk 1`)" a P.O.Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 r •• I.it S J f i i;i�. ?4` I pl: AF'N: 153-413-65 Charles E. Spencer 19750 Cambridge Lane �pNTINGlpy Huntington Beach•.GA.92646-421'7 _ y � 9 � c . y�F '.,t n.e•� ��Q �pUNTY LP LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING Iltittttltltiltttlttitlltttl,tittltl•ttllltttll,lttl Connie Brockway,City Clerk .- City of Huntington Beach j. �s,•" _ Office of the City Clerk y' ' P.O.Box 190 .�,... _5 I' fw51 9 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 desk• (n S a- Con 15.3-414Tow 1` �NTINGTp � Continental Town `lor.rse As F{irntinc"}t"}t rnJ l9F..)Ol Drooklimrst. ,t. `---f Hun ti.n WUh1T801 92h%400a 1491 04l11l92 y : UNTINGTON CONTINENTALP if2:ZU 17621 17TH ST #270 rV:i rIN CA 92hA0-218h RETURN TO SENDER ppuNTY Cp LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING — oZ t Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk [•'`•'- �"^1 - ( hl'l 9 P.O.Box190 r,• r..• ((., n. .. p.., _ .-. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ' ''•' oK APN: 933-39-107 Allen,1{. Shomalmr, µ'i5�ga Ili tat l_:ister Lane TINGTpy� lii.u�ti.ngton Beach CA92646 _SHOM792 92h116400r 1191 '92! SHOMAKCR��, o c 190h PARK ST 9 HUN I INU FUN BEACH CA 9iJe48-i4'7SH vyc� •„;"„ `\�pQ RETURN TO SENDER �puNTY cp LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING — v� Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach `;-- ' �y Office of the City Clerk P.O.Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 APN: 153-41:2-'1Z I$$8� Va.xuW.- Janet 11. WE-11r aZ*ms 0!C Tp 19795 l'loventl�i''ilane pNTING N89a646 Oar yew 1{r.rntington CA9 Li bcll :_646-R236 rnJ 9yc�ppuNTY,6p��oe LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 13" a mot ' !` ° ••> Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 OK (-1PMa 153-•-414-08 InT W. Gregory Lee 19771 Tnverr'c•js L_clrle O��pNTINGtpy� I••Iun t i.ng•l oe B : CA92f��6�5....!42 4R Li � � y y'•', i� ub C' ppUN T Y �P` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O.Box 190 Eli n"r, Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ) . J ----------- 6K AP1,1- (-,(:)ra Lee(.Randc)lph 19EJ0 Claremont Lane HuntinIgto i4m---h CA926,16 pppNTY GP LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway.City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O.Box 190 A111 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 1, 1< AP111- 153-154-19 Kenneth Heki(niAn MIS V,01. Plot-ning Tide Dr. IINGyeFqfr1J I.A.intingtcin Bearh CA9264B ilk �pUNTY 6p LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING A. Connie Brockway,City Clerk v-tA 0 - " City of Huntington Beach "p-W-Y . ... 1. . Office of the City Clerk J,,I'. P.O.Box 190 l, Huntington Beach,CA 92648 0� APIq. 1153,--:LEjj-0:L School Fountain Valley Dij-,t 9461 TIx]-ber-L Ave. ING 17(:)UrltAirl Vjy (:,A927Ojj.' cFppU NTI LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clark P.O.Box 190 k.l-. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ----------- APN- 153-41�J-10----, ma Kathleen L.-',L'A'rise'n ING 1.9779 In Vernt�sis; LAne HUntingtrl A46--4242 C, �pp NTI LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk _ City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk i' .;..., ,i • P.O.Box 190 i` I'l 9 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 = f OK Wi.l.liam R:�,Deason 9585`'E1lr..kley Ur. ��IS�g2' Hunti.ng'toi5-.`Reach CA926A6-41.59 SpN1INGTpy 01 pOUNTY 6p LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk '• !:• i{ L; P.O.Box 190 9. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 0 TING N y AF'I � '7 `t 0 Fgrtht.1 u prawn O d� 963E1 L d llr. CA U: 9 6/16-41.17 H � ---- � y 11�.inti.n �y�s✓` c�K yc�pOUNTY.`p`\E LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach - Office of the City Clerk Y a P.O.Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 I,E. f 1 (� tii9 9 rl =1 Al"N. 9ii3-39-Q%y,i OK Keith L. L_r�wiii<er AT '24ta62 Camino Vi a 4�ISI9$ TINGTpy P:EA. '1•ora CA9:_63Q vC, � sa 2 9y�Fp0UNTY 6p��oQ LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach ,.. _•••, i 'h:_ , Office of the City Clerk - P.O.Box 190 _ IS RPR 9 n2 i I_ Huntington Beach,CA 92646 .. _ S i i i J J 3.7 3,;L \\ �]MOVED,lER NOORDER r�-:":`'=='`��.�.,.••• ; 0INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS t ATTEMPTED,UNKNOYM —" P o A P# CPO SUCH NUMBER Resident (17 T 9761'Constitution Dr. ' :�Huritington•8aach, CA 92646 y�ls qa' o��pNTINGTpyB 92646-4636 NUNTINGTON BEACH CA y __ e� pOUNTY %P� LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING `- — • „ i Connie Brockway,City Cie City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk clLd �D :a P.O.Box 190 ¢ ;� I(� ANltl�'!Z' ,• c {•C `+ .. - Huntington Beach,CA 92648 I Q(\ APN: 153-413--67 M J 1Af31'1'Y f Vil1.astmor 9�i7J�a- . ?piINGTp 19742 Cambridge Lane d N Huntiti ton.,rleach CA9 2646--4 2 1 7 a_I \ •l Zp LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING � Iltltt,t1.I,Iltttlttltlltttl.,I,tltitttlll.t,il�lttl Connie Brockway,City Clerk .• City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ' E; i i i ( •, _ i P.O.Box 190 I+ AN)0 L Y ! , \\ Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ' 1'. ! L.i ,a,l i 7;f t !., ,• , ✓, ,L?` S APN: 9:i::i-'.:i9•-•0.5`i nI . Char*les M. Coomber J 'c`.16ti:.. Hana6:ai Lane �� N11NGIy' pi�c F4t.tntington Bear_h OA92646 � V Ca _--_ _= � qC• "'+-f.JOf165i! 92[,4F�4i!ti2 J_i�i i+4111:'.92 NO FORWARD ORDER ON~t-ILE UNABLE TO FORWARD kr"iliRN il'I :6EFiOER �0 rcp� LEGAL NOTICE-PUBLIC HEARING �a Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ('•;.:::. +:.t I, n'i ,1 11 - r• ' P.O.Box 190 t•:::.. ,1 ,t Huntington Beach,CA 92648 1 t t,i ��Lit APN: 153--41 -;i9 nr3 George J. t_ark,.ins 6827 Pear Tree Dr, Carlsbad CA92009 ,��NI INGTpN G y LARKBFORWA27 RDING TIMEI. lEXPIRCqQ EDil192 LARKINS 9 a 1103 VIA CAfiR LO SAN MARCOS t-A 52Oe9-E182 `:,� �;-_,,•;r`CEO RETURN TO SENDER '�oaNrr cP I Fr,AI NnTIf;F-PI IRI If'HFARING , t t L vibbiiu TowmiGNEY3, lw. 9635 Cornwull Drive Huntington Beach,-CA 92646 Phone: (714) 962-9911VZOy April 11 , 1992 � � r City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ,y Huntington Beach,. CA 92648 Attn: Jim Silva r� Dear Mr. Silva, Thank you for responding to my letter referencing entitlements submitted by Tamanjan/Fountain Valley Partners, III . I , as well as others in opposition to .the deveopment of the Bus.hard School site , feel a great deal of frustration that the School District is included in meetings in regard to this matter while the Community is excluded. Mr. Silva, this deveopment has been somewhat included in the overall vacant school site issue, while remaining as a seperate issue. I had asked the developer to notify me of all actions as they occured. I WAS NOT NOTIFIED. Those of us who attended the community meetings (RAILROAD SESSIONS) which were held by the developer, were all left with the impression that there would be another community meeting before the project moved forward. The main body in opposition knew nothing until the notice of the public hearing was mailed. Yes, there was publication in an obscure newspaper. There are statements in the reports that all interested parties were notified. I suppose that the Community is not considered to be in the interested parties group. WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED. I .have to date heard several statements to the fact that this proposal had moved forward "so far" , had been given "a green light". by the City of Huntington Beach, etc , before the Community came forward with their concerns . Some state that it is not fair to the developer to not allow this project to go forth after so much money has been spent'. Mr Silva, we tried to voice our concerns earlier. We were told that we would have our chance. to speak at the public hearing . Which we did. Now, however, it seems that .this is not the correct time to' object , given that there are those who feel that n our concerns were voiced TOO LATE. U I � I must ask, why hold public hearings at all if it' s TOO LATE? Are we to assume that the project WILL be approved and go forward because we ( The Community ) worked within the system? Please prove to us that the system can work. Let us know that the information we have been providing to you is being considered, that the petitions are either of some concern to the Council or of no concern at all. We have obtained a copy of the 1990 census and will be submitting graphs to you to try to express the density of .this area. The census proves that this quarter section has a larger than normal number of small children about to enter the public school system. It is entirely possible that Bushard School will again be needed in the near future , dispite what Fountain Valley School District says, after all they are not concerned with Huntington Beach school children, they are concerned with Fountain Valley School Districts budget. The question has been raised "how can the City tell the School District that they cannot develop their land?" Private landowners all over Southern California are being told that they can. not develop their land on the beach or in the canyon, because it is not in the best interest of the whole. Is it not the duty of the City to see the error in the judgement of the Fountain Valley School District. This is public land, paid for by the taxpayers . This deveopment , in the long run, will benefit the few, very little , and harm many greatly. This deveopment would .be detrimental to the general health, welfare , safety and convenience, and detrimental and injurious to the value of property and improvements of the nieghborhood. Considering the existing density and the surrounding construction, the building bulk, building height and traffic circulation will be detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood . Please , please consider the health and welfare of the existing 1274 homes in this quarter section, as well as that of 58 new homes , and deny the application of Tamanjan/Fountain Valley Partnership, III . I again thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, . ". s Jean Abel cc: City Council Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator Mike Adams, Community Developement Director HugrINOTON BEACH, CA 92646 **Oo )�jta opal--jOrl OjV/ ek,,,9 Y%E �E� �I-}e �f�uN6t25 -`0. w it q,I O;D c iT v)Aot Orbe N"*Cr Lra c -rffE IWA-Pry; AkDTTP4—r`� Crt'f WqS AoLCO 9wO ' tr (rw7-D PJTOOOO"-,A Suasr�o nr , dug ff)'= t6ug;;g ;T6�1v1.D @a� R sE � /r�r gsMes &RoJO 0000, Lr4 pp r-,4nm �rcFA� rC � eN P� Ptreio04i�4r/'f QiKCR2f�; HCC4-oa n a,� cdye'i.. v 1Wn}„qp% pwJ, (A SY6 'F6 YOUR VOICE IS NEEDED!!! City Council Meeting - 20 April, 1992 , THE FINAL CHANCE TO EXERCISE YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO VOICE YOUR OPINION ON THE BUSHARD SCHOOL HOUSING r t.DEVELOPMENT4SSUE WILL OCCUR,ON MONDAY NIGHT 20 APRIL 1992 AT 7:00 P.M.AT THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY MALL, 2000 MAIN' , STREET, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA. An,appeal for City�Cauncil-action was.transmitted by the Trumanjan/Fountain Valley Partners'contesting the denial of of Conditional and Special'Use Permits by the Planning Commission. Without.th_ese permits, The Trumanjan/Fountain Valley Partners will be;unable to develop the housing pojec rt at the._13ushafd School,site: d ' This is the end of the discussion on this projectllllllll If the;CitydG7oucl apprnves this item; the Development will begin nd they THE OPEN AREA FOR OUR CHILDREN, PETS AND FUTURE GENERATIONS WILL`.?E GONE FOREVERUM11111 The planning commission could not approve the developer's request by a simple majority becauseahe citizens came out in force and stated their1eelings. .It.appears that public outcry to maintain this resource prevented three of-the planning commissioners from voting in favor of this issue, and instead they.listened to the citizens. . ' 'Even with the,Planning Commission denial, The Community Development Agency has made,a staff recommendation t&the Council-to approve"the project. IN DISCUSSING THE 20 APRIL MEETING WITHA CITY STAFF MEMBER,,HE n STATEDTHAT.THE'COUNCIL DOESN'T REALIZE THE PASSION OF THIS ISS UE, AND HOW WELL THE CITIZEN MAYBE ORGANIZED. C NO MATTER WHAT YOUR POSITION IS ON THIS ISSUE, PLEASE ATTEND THE C.OUNCIL.MEETING. MAKE A STATEMENT TO THE `COUNCIL IF YOU CAl�', $UT EVEN MOR9IA11PORTANT, BE THERE FOR MORAL SUPPORT. H S I�('!OR OPEN LAND, AND WL MUST CHERISH-AND PROTACT ITlll!' t t. t _} ✓ b e If you have any questions please call: DAVID FOX 963-9256 Rim 09 W 4; A �• r. .CORRECTION. ITEM C-2 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may reaffirm the Planning Commission' s action on March 3, 1992 by denying Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 91-15, Zone Change No. 91-3, Tentative Tract Map No. 14515 and Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 with special permits with findings as outlined in Attachment No. 11. C ' COMMUNITY INPUT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-25 ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-3 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14515/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-15 TO: Huntington Beach City Council ti l �iFc 9 RE: Bushard School Site Development I ask that the Council not approve the Negative Declaration No. 91: 15, and Conditional Use Permit No. 91 -25 and Zone Change 91-3 for 6. reasons summarized below. A more detailed discussion of these each of these points is attached. S l 1 . The neighborhood surrounding the Bushard school site has a inordinately acute need for open space due to the high population density. 2 . The proposed development would essentially block access to the park and Oka school site from the most densely populated areas . 3 . The proposed development would create an alley between Oka school and the currently adjacent park. 4. Schools should be located in the center of a tract (an option which is available to the school district) . 5 . The proposed complex is not consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. 6. It' s not fair to significantly degrade our neighborhood to supposedly benefit the city or school district as a whole. This area loses a recreational facility built to meet the needs of the youth of this area. The remaining school Oka will be left with only 8. 7 acres making it the smallest school in the FVSD and Oceanview School District. 7 . School district lands are public property and the criteria for developing public land should be more stringent than for developing private property. 8. The city should not approve any specific school site development before the general topic of school site development has been thoroughly evaluated. 9 . All methods for funding school districts budgetary shortfalls have not been fully explored. Sincerely, Gaylyn Meyers _ 9662 Warburton Huntington Beach REASONS FOR NOT APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-15, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-25 AND ZONE CHANGE 91-3. SUPPORTING DISCUSSION. 1 . HIGH POPULATION DENSITY REQUIRES MORE OPEN SPACE The square block area around the Bushard School site is one of the highest density population areas of Huntington Beach. There are approximately 1274 homes in this neighborhood. Based on the park dedication requirement this area needs approximately 19 acres of park. (Acres = 5 x # of units x density factor / 1000 = 5 x 1274 units x 3 people/unit / 1000 = 19 acres) . If the proposed development is approved, our neighborhood will have less 40% of this calculated open space requirement. Although it is true that park dedication formula was intended to calculate average open space needs rather than tract-by-tract requirements, our quarter section is one of the furthest from Huntington Beach' s large recreation areas. These areas include the beach, Central Park, Linear Park, Mile Square Park, Edison Center_ , and Murdy Center. The Fountain Valley School District has also recently sold the Lamb School which is located less than 3 blocks from Bushard School. Eliminating this heavily used recreation area further increases the need for recreational space at Bushard school and should be considered at this time. 2 . DEVELOPMENT BLOCKS ACCESS TO PARK AND SCHOOL There are three developments in this quarter section (approximately 900 homes) which will have access to Oka school and Bushard park severely impaired by this development. Currently residents from these developments use two separate openings in the south side of the Bushard school to get to Oka School and the park. If the proposed development is approved one opening will be permanently blocked and the other will only be open during school hours. There is also .no guarantee that this second opening will not be completely closed in the future. Since the streets in the proposed development will be private, the developments homeowner' s association may, in a year or two, close the opening to keep the "condo people" from parading through their exclusive tract. Without access through Bushard School residents, mostly children, from these 900 homes must walk along Brookhurst, Adams and an Bushard boulevards then along Constitution or Warburton to get their remaining open space and School. r T 3 . DEVELOPMENT CREATES ALLEY BETWEEN PARK AND OKA SCHOOL Currently Bushard park is directly adjacent and open to the school sites. The proposed development would completely isolate Bushard park and result in a narrow 30 foot long alley to provide access between the park and Oka school. This alley would be an out of view place for teenagers to loiter and drink and poses a serious nuisance to our neighborhood. Our community should be trying to eliminate problem areas like this rather than creating new ones. There is also a serious threat that access through this alley would be limited or blocked in the future. This would be the probable response by the school district and neighborhood to a year or so of "alley problems" . Should this occur, access to Oka school and open space for the existing residents would be further limited. 4. SCHOOLS SHOULD BE LOCATED IN CENTER OF TRACTS There is an obvious solution to the access/alley problems described in Items 2 and 3 . Develop the Oka school site instead of the Bushard site. This alternative, proposed by the neighborhood, would consolidate the open space in the center of the tract, eliminate the access problems and provide quieter classrooms for our children. I The school district indicated that this option was rejected because renovation costs for Bushard School would decrease the profits for the district. Although this is undoubtedly true, the penalty to the neighborhood is significant. We should insist that development decisions be made with consideration to the long term costs and benefits. Bushard school site development appears to be a short term, self serving decision by our school district with little regard for our community. 5 . THE PROPOSED COMPLEX IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE REST OF THE HOMES IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD Although the developer tried to cosmetically match the surounding area he failed in a major aspect. Our homes are predominantly single story. The proposed complex is all two story raised an additional 4 feet to meet flood requirements. This will put a block of houses much taller, closer spaced in the middle of our tract. I ask you to deny all special permits for the reason that this complex is not consistent with the rest of our neighborhood and this complex will not enhance our neighborhood. 6. UNFAIR TO DEGRADE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD TO BENEFIT CITY OR FVSD The school district has no charter to maintain the standard of living in this neighborhood. The city council is there to protect our rights. I was concerned that some council members stated that these projects had been around for several years, had "green lights" and that it is unfair to the school districts to not approve them. The Planning Commission meeting was our first opportunity to speak out regarding these projects . These "green lights" given before public input, before the planning staff evaluation, and before the environmental assessment really gives the illusion of dealing unfair with our neighborhood. Another issue is that when the "green lights" for this project were initially given the amount of land originally sold was 8. 19 acres which left 10. 3 acres for the remaining school Oka. The developer after renegotiation is now developing 9 .8 acres which will leave only 8. 7 acres for Oka. This additional 1 . 6 acres is a major reduction in the amount of open space to be left. The remaining acreage for Oka of 8.7 acres will leave the Oka school as the smallest school in the FVSD with one of the highest enrollments in the district. The other schools sites in the FVSD average 12 . 74 acres and Oceanview school sites average 13 acres. It is my contention that because the FVSD got greedy the remaining Oka site with 8.7 acres will be below community standards set by the rest of the Fountain Valley School District and this project should not be permitted to remove any acreage that would leave the Oka site with any less than 10 acres net. Grace Winchell mentioned the possibility of Federal funds to purchase park lands for areas of our city which need it. I applaud that idea and believe it should be done prior to developing this site. The decision to not purchase the land from FVSD in 1988 was an administrative one and not made by the council and the public was not provided an opportunity to present our input. I spoke to Jim Engle in 1990 regarding the possibility of the city requiring that the school district dedicate land instead of paying the in lieu fees to meet the Parkland dedication requirement. I had hoped that Bushard Park could be extended over to Education Lane with city purchasing a small amount of acreage. I was told the decision was already made and that the city needed funds to develop McCallen Park so they want the fees instead. After pursuing how the FVSD was going to reimburse the city of HB for the loss of the gym which was built with HUD funds, I found that two of our council members formed an ad hoc committee and instructed the FVSD that they wanted fair market value for the gym and that this money will go directly to the Boys and Girls Club to pay off their bank loans. This was instead of FVSD offer to build another gym at Talbert Middle School which could . serve the youths of our area. Our area needs a gym for activities for the youth of our area. This is why the gym was built in the first place. Our area appears to be very low on City' s list of priorities. 7. SCHOOLS ARE PUBLIC PROPERTY AND SHOULD HAVE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS Although the school district insists that school sites are not public lands, the community does not agree. The public perceives this school land as open space, uses it as open space and uses the surplus facilities for community needs. City Council with public hearings should make the final determination as to whether or not school sites should be purchased from the school district when offered to the City for purchase by the school districts as is required by law. This is not what happened in the case of Bushard School . As a parent of two small children I appreciate the needs of schools . But I do not believe the public supports selling off school lands . The citizens of Huntington Beach were very clear when Proposition C was passed in 1990 that we want any development of our beaches and parks to be carefully scrutinized, evaluated and voted on by the people. I believe the communities desire to save open space and recreational areas extends to lands associated with schools. I was gratified that the Planning Commission indicated similar concerns. The citizens of Huntington Beach believe this land belongs to the community and should be available for future needs such as parks, recreational facilities and just open space which is also an important commodity. 8. THOROUGH EVALUATION OF SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT REOUIRED PRIOR TO ANY APPROVAL At the study session on April 6 regarding the proposed sale and development of several school properties in our city it appeared that council did not feel that school land is any different than private land. It is imperative that prior to the approval of one more development on school/public land that the city of Huntington Beach thoroughly study and evaluate the impact of the loss of open space and school facilities. The city needs to formulate specific guidelines about how to evaluate open space requirements for a neighborhood. The entire school issue needs to be studied extensively before this development is approved. We need to be long range planners to be sure as our city enters the 21st century the decisions of the 90 ' s don' t leave our city as a less desirable place to live. The City Councils of the 1970's had visions for our city when Central Park was purchased and Central Library was built. We need similar visionary Council members now. 7 9 . SCHOOL DISTRICT UNIFICATION VS. SELLING OUR PUBLIC LANDS I understand the schools need money but believe selling off public lands should be a last resort. I believe the five school districts in our city need to unify into one district and eliminate duplicate job functions and facilities. It is time for our districts to stop being in the business of providing jobs and start concentrating on the most important aspect of the school system which is the teachers and the students. The inefficiency of our current system of 5 districts is appalling. The money which could be freed up by eliminating an estimated 40-50% of the school districts administration and bureaucracy will far exceed the "potential" profit of these asset sales. The public will be more understanding if the school districts do everything they can instead of selling of assets which once gone can never be replaced. I ask the City Council form a public advisory panel to study this subject and move in this direction. How can we rely on a school district which overbuilt the number of schools needed in our area by over 50%(four of the seven FVSD schools in Huntington Beach are surplus) to make appropriate long range plans. No one can foretell the future but as school districts on all sides of us are reopening schools and as we see an increase especially in our neighborhood in children under 5 why will the Fountain Valley School District be any different? We all agree that schools need more money. But that money must come from state and federal sources to ensure equal funding for all school districts. FVSD is entering a lawsuit with several other school districts suing the state for equal funding for all districts . I believe that if the school districts prevail and equal funding for school districts is mandated those richer school districts such as FVSD which have sold off assets to provide additional funds to supplement their state money will be forced to get less money from the state and federal government. The FVSD claims this can' t happen since they have contracts from state administrators. But if I was in another district without those extra funds, I would require the funding laws be changed so that a FVSD would not have extra monies. I believe if the funding laws change that those agreements would be voided out and our city will be the loser since we will have sold off our assets essentially to supplement the state general fund. .[J oger Wolfertz, assistant gen- eral counsel for the state.De- partment of Education, said the FUNDS. Suit 127 School Distr icts , state has complied with the Serra- no decision, which requires fund- Suing to Overhaul ing disparities between districts-to by Schools 1 be limited to$100 per pupil. State Funding System "If they are going to argue that : Seeks Overhaul we don't comply, then they are going to have to show us how," I By CATi IERiNE GEWERTZ Wolfertz said. Continued from A3 . TIMES STAFF WRITER Jacqueline Price, spokeswoman for the Capistrano Unified district, The new lawsuit, to be filed in Frustrated by the perennial lack of money ! said the sheer number of plaintiffs Orange County Superior Court,re- for California students, 127 school districts will i indicates the severity of the prob- "iterates the earlier suit's claim that unequal distribution of money to join today in a lawsuit demanding an overhaul lem. school districts violates the Serra- of the state's school funding system,contend- "It's not just one district,or five no-Priest ruling.But it adds a new Ing it illegally deprives pupils of their consti- or eight districts,"she said. "There argument—that even if equally tutional right to a decent education. are districts out there serving tens distributed, the amount of money Nine school districts, led by the Capistrano of thousands of children who are currently dedicated to kindergar- Unified School District in south Orange Coun- not getting their fair share." ten through 12th-grade public. ty, mounted a similar, smaller-scale legal Arch J. Haskins, superintendent schools in California is simply not challenge in November,1990,arguing that the of Anaheim's Magnolia School Dis- enough to provide the "adequate" i state had violated the law by failing to provide trict, another plaintiff, said it education mandated by law. equal funding for each school district.But that makes no sense that the eight "The issue is no longer only lawsuit was never served on the state and was elementary schools in his district equality" among districts, .said later dismissed. get $200 to $300 less per student John McDermott, the school dis- Led by the attorney who won the landmark than the eight schools in the-near tricts'lawyer."For many students, 1974 Serrano vs. Priest case, which held that by Cypress School District, which programs and districts,•you're now failure to provide equal funding violates equal is similar in student population.He looking at an eroding. quality of protection provisions of the state Constitution, added that disparities of as much as education overall, to the point the districts have vastly expanded their attack $1,000 exist between some other where it's no longer adequate. with new arguments and scores of additional districts. McDermott cited studies by the plaintiffs. Statistics from the Orange Coun- National Education Assn., which 1 Please see FUNDS A14 ty Department of Education for the found that California spent $4,644 ' 1991-92 school year show that the per pupil in the 1990-91 school amount that each of the county's 27 year, compared to the national districts gets in state revenue average of $5,261 per student, ranges from $2,983 to $3,728. Offi- ranking the state 33rd in the na- cials note that those figures do not tion. In 1973, McDermott noted, take into account the funding that California ranked 16th in spending may not come through because of on its students. the state budget deficit. Elementary, high school and McDermott contends that the unified school districts from all state spending figures do not tell over the state are plaintiffs in the the whole story because of the lawsuit, including eight in Orange effect of budget cutbacks and loop- County.They plan to ask a judge to holes that affect a district's fund- I declare the state's school funding ing. system illegal, hoping that such a For instance,some districts have ruling will force change in the state I been able to garner enough voter Legislature,McDermott said.Since support to pass a flat "parcel tax" 1989, Texas, Montana, Kentucky, on property, thereby gaining $200 New Jersey and West Virginia all or $300 per pupil more than a have lost lawsuits alleging their neighboring district that was un- school funding systems are inade- able to gather enough support for quate and are now working on such a tax,McDermott said. revisions,McDermott said. Other Orange County districts that are plaintiffs in the suit are Fountain Valley, Anaheim City, Westminster, Buena Park, Brea- Olinda Unified and the Fullerton Joint Union high School districts. f � " P NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-25 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS/ ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-3/ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14515/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-15 (Construct 58 Unit Single Family Dwellings) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, April 20, 1992, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 91-25 with special permits, Zone Change No. 91-3, Tentative Tract Map No. 14515 and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 91-15 APPLICANT/ Tumanjan/Fountain Valley Partners, L.P. III APPELLANT: LOCATION: 9800 Yorktown Avenue (approximately 650 south of Yorktown Avenue, southwest side of Education Lane-Bushard School) ZONE: CF-E. (Community Facilities-Education)/ Underlying R1 (Low Density Residential) REOUEST: To subdivide 10 . 15 gross acres of land into a 58 unit detached single family residential planned development with special permits . The special permits are for: 1) reduction of the minimum exterior sideyard; 2) reduction of the interior sideyard setback; 3) reduction of the interior sideyard setback for garages; 4) reduced side to side building separation; 5) reduced accessway and building separation; 6) reduced setback between main recreation area and a dwelling unit; 7) permit a cabana in lieu of a clubhouse facility; and 8) reduction of the required private accessway requirement. The proposal also includes a zone change request to add the PD (Planned Development) suffix to the existing underlying R1 (Low Density Residential) zoning designation and remove the CF-E (Community Facilities-Education) overlay. (OVER) n r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) APPEAL: The appellant is appealing the Planning Commission' s consecutive split vote (February 19, 1992 and March 3 , 1992) on the above mentioned applications . The Planning Commission did not reach a majority vote in favor of approval or denial on the applications on consecutive meetings and therefore the application is deemed denied based upon the failure to reach a majority vote. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: This project is covered by mitigated Negative Declaration No. 91-15 . PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE: (1) Staff Report (2) Public Hearing (3) City Council Discussion; and (4) City Countil Action COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council ' s action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or -in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk, City of Huntington Beach (2765d) DATE DEPARTMENT MARCH 5, 1992 SPECIAL SERVICES OR- 124453 -M PST AMER, C u P 46 � e a FY' t American Title Insurance Company _114 EAST FIFTH STREET, (P. 0. BOX 267)SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92702• (714)558-3211 L(HE'RB FAULAND REFERENCE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 300' VARIANCE 2000 MAIN ST. APN: 153-181-01 THIRD FLOOR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN WITH REMITTANCE S STATEMENT DATE _RECORDED RECORDINGS Deeds Deed of Trust Notice of Completion Assignments Requests for Notice Reconveyance VARIANCE ?250. 00 GENERAL CHARGES Mechanics' Lien Report Probate Guarantee Lot Book Report Property Report Drawing Full Reconveyance Drawing Partial Re-conveyance Property Transfer Tax Endorsement PAY THIS AMOUNT IN $250. 00 THANK YOU FOR DIRECTING THIS ORDER TO US. ANY RECORDED DOCUMENTS TO WHICH YOU ARE ENTITLED WILL BE FORWARDED DIRECT FROM THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER. OR- 124453 -M First American Title Insurance Company 114 EAST FIFTH STREET, (P. 0. BOX 267)SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92702• (714)558.3211 2096 (REV. 9/69) GUARANTEE LIABILITY $100.00 ORDER NO. 124453-M FEE $250.00 YOUR REF: 153-181-01 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a Corporation, herein called the Company, GUARANTEES CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN ST. THIRD FLOOR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA herein called the Assured,against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated above which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the.assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurances herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth above. Dated: MARCH 2, 1992 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY � /jw"l James F. Gominsky Assistant Vice President Director of Special Services First American Title Insurance Co. 114 E. Fifth Street Santa Ana, CA 92702 714/558-3211 • r SCHEDULE A PROPERTY OWNER'S NOTICE GUARANTEE 1. That, according to the last equalized "Assessment Roll" in the Office of the Orange County Tax Assessor - a. The persons listed as "Assessed Owner" are shown on the assessment roll as owning real property within 300 feet of the property identified on the assessment roll as Assessor's Parcel Number 153-181-01. b. The Assessor's Parcel Number and any addresses shown on the assessment roll are attached hereto. 2. That, according to the Company's property records, (but without examination of those Company records maintained or indexed by name), there have been no documents recorded subsequent to April, 1991 purporting to transfer title to any of the properties listed. a Iowa NO POP. W 112, NE. 114, SE //4, SEC. 6, T. 6 S., R. /0 W. 153_ 19 Q� --/ L--J — EDUCATION L ANF. ,6 i .m t' --- -- '--- .r •To 90 BO k i. lU • C.: b=; ti. _ r- oK.: :•urOOc PARK PU•SHJPO SCHOOL PA AK l.SGJ/RO OKA F1..E•wf' ,%4 RY SCH OC ( 1�� JOHN ,y OVSHARO EC ENf'NTagY SCHOOL ry 0 V 4 —- R.S. 71- 14 ...I R 6 0- 3 '".. II ' i I L II C ��ti 272' I, a0• > l 4 415 �u` 1 �5 MARCH 196E NOTE- ASSESSOR'S ©LOCKS A.SSE550R'S MAP PIPM PUMPERS BOOK l53 ,'46E i8 SHOWN iN CIRCLES COU,'/TY OF ORANGF ,'^? -r• F�';As .;!c• ;�„', •:�� 1. r"�� ^ mil'. crw,g;,•� ..•a.o.�}:rS�!::.�'),•c,�,�f".`''Jd..�.'2`2 a..�.�3, ;�:A•.f`'i t ,',.ftys;.:'.yi:..� yt'�}'.�.t,n'^�,s''�iF„��''( s'.K:•v.:��y.'�:!2.F•y.,�p�i;�' `:..y��tr••,,M.t�.K��t..s`'��'.S.'��+::'i�li-;� E,I�r�Y:>'::?✓:>%`Z,'"�.sr,.,,,?','S�r':a+.,�:r.:,..,.y.-�;',r�r`"r•t'.r+R.,.�',��,. :{7 a 7 •:".i;i5 ....,� • ^rr^�..;';-p:%^�g'i::c.�r�-r;:,i•'.s.,_A.-�. :_'Z�'u�r,,,z•�T�!-x"t3 .:.,;Zr'y'?'� '#ic..n-��..,�,,..,_..-'r: i'b,,.a.... ... &1 et^�N. .,H.; :'•�'w.,. ;a:' ,,,.i;H d'P'�'f: ..a;r,L:,��J;<',�'-.' -�,7': .9ii?„':'•. , ��c.;l•3�.`Ft'w'a,3WT=�",;f-y�r"'?h s}'�`}`'�Y fr �S 3�a. {,.��lr�'.J,r,+i a:�"'6`yt:=a•��' ��'l:'bsC'<''�" "7•••�'"' ... .. ,�r`". �• •.:d;;;;;.Ys�. i��.ti'-�-',:n,�Si'.ir_�,�.+-YES:^°.:,ham r' I $�%� :�`�:,a�C:i1 _i S' .w,�� ,.i:�ti�:.x„x� A. ._.._.�....z...�.,.as:::�..:r_:.��s:a.+.':•:.rd.•, .(��.o..'- �• ��s3rttSVY/.,x .,..t,..y•._ems.,,�..:::,;.r��...;r;.�F,�. ,r •�'�.iru;.:.�yx,. .:�1� r �-�`. "J� gt`x'�S:K't;r�v'��v.� a � 153 - W >< �o� 155 �� I e 155 -03 o � 2011 v /oo ° p— — 9RC%OKHUR,ST �-q— lw.prc,�r sraser� - STREET c ao'LZ1I f B°J''.rn�o 3'.5rr s.ac7r^ 1V' • s 71.7rG'/`/ TS�or 7 ` O �+•.,.c:Zy7 g 4T 46 �2,'t B" "±55' . r0 S"O/.Oi'g =T4ACT 98TRACI rr I �J (o �39i' tC r31 7 c 5 2J02 JU .f<' 9c° 17 9)f `u i,. 43 reel' 3 °w v1 SS! ', ° 6) 3• , O C+a V ♦ oo' ,/�s•,' SO' — !.: rr • 'p so' p OR �+ ` 22 so. ' Je, r� LQ .i LQ 3e1 I I nt r I_/ l�l v V �, o v 1 r—'—01, w 5 \192, 15 23 r ---1 0 -303Ca 24 o 15 24 ° 6 I4 p, 24 �6; 15i 116 !23 7J rJ ter.>. s 12 1! 34 LU ( :�� /2p' <Or,a.3 o r o WJt"l�) �7S (Or4oSJ'/' ._ls__�IIlIii_/:o 7 >�/.,••e'.•��e' Q•c 'v_/�.c_r' J'rf1~Sa�.r_n Jr ��oc �?m v�o .:raT' JJsS_II J6 roe' OV �v°t° .O7 ' Sct 4UJS p tS, 2 o ' p M! P11 0 /7 O /oo8) j SS✓ f/ UJ 9 0 LP2L 29 7 }`6y .1' 7r' 117 40 - LANE E2)UCA;t . / rVA,--CH /965 TRACT h"O. 6/! Y. d/. LJ-[3-45, 46 !•fOTE-ASSESSOR'S BLOCK ASSESSOR'S MAP 'I TRAC7— 6/56 M./rJ. 255- /4, /5 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 153PAGE 19 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY Of O;.ANGE ,i/ 'Z'te"F`N"i'�"••� .nip/;*-Sit.':.-3na .m i "y5i?:�N', 1 v'firin',�i7�p ,i' S" �"".� '�,r., .;�F ly�r. �i" 't'Ce••3%>' Rv�'*'✓"R'''! ;w. 4 !t ! � K. y: t, ;�•r; ::; �faEz+ w lrr ar 7',+I�lr f 5•j�r� 1 4t 1.lj., ,� r t ;'fir $ 2 ri� �� letr. pi•:.0 L L i *, S 7, *'x '"R'Sb:4s"1T�'y�' )2))'77S•,.''�i y�'��•. •kr'�., } .,rf?'t •a�,��er:.l, n S ��:1� i?a 3�'S ." r+C!'n�T'1. �:•��,I,iY.r...,.�?r!:•'�::`�•i� •,�' t4.'!y''�a 'pd $ t' s.i� �t,r.;..1. ��.� .;Sr.: .�i, �7'n t`:^�•},•�'k•w 9 t. 7� .7,t. �r .1�1. r. �I',',' (,/Gl�I;...> -;f)�wr';,.Ir.,Sf ';� n.,. ;.,I:. � .V�� 3. �1Ji..�� .'�F.. �V !:'?! '.G,.4 .r.�e'�,s•,-c., �,�. 1 ;:�c:..�;-'7►}"u' r.i. � [ �f :.(. !/',.dry; r. r r`.dp,7 .fir v'4 r .ti,' .+'�, $f.i. •..r e.xt.rq �} S. j• �r�'�� ' vra•• ��. v,✓ �'F :i��,i:, �.Wl, :lCre,• 6 F ``L,S.� a. .sn. ��.t`�.�,•:� '$i`�L wr «r r�..:P�. ,kl�i n .'�:t.r..;sitl :w y ./. ,ry,,. �`..,47vrc' tr f� � )J}��.j r '•St'i••F ..3{•h ,.1�`Ji $� .rya rF, >':�� .., ,)y �.!>;.�.t..r�?..r', •Jy ^�� S♦'1 I' IJJG"Y.�}�Piy�•(� r .� :hAr ..,.+1 v�. .� '.f '.1� t�..•.,JJ Y-,�2, �.J`Y ...�N .:1\':� .Cr..L,�.�jT<c�12j1��h .. .. iS.4(S:J.i S ��.,,w t9:. i .]..•-•�51..l .rU }�"p}f•. �{:i:'F.., `i 'rs. .E , � r R. .dr. '•rt ,.r, Sj g• ".a �� Hr. �• rl.•s....-,,,; .,r. M1�, .,t, r��. r�Y 1i':v;;,Y :ray ,1tlf ?$� arY.eyr i•Dr1 1, `gyp.,.�r,.. .�! ,•a' ,vr. •. ,1`•.... d:��;°i'.,:51,,s.'� :k #. F.• �i'.ii'i.�a ,,.Js: :r�.!. •�`� .... r•�, i,• 't. .�'�!�j.79��i� a.t�. {d ':ttt:7•�•vt`,dux•rMs,�+u�rC: :�(�1(.•.�fp.:'Fil>..C(:fr':^hh,,�:, •! ':T,. �. �r'.•ii:lrt; :t+'.:� .. ., •.+. �' . .. ,r....d��,.SYf.:'i'•'. '�,.» err 3R�:'3;tf�• r�...+,�' rh 'r•�?!.f't'`•� r'4`s.F'� ;,,>ti).;tiyr, x'�r'Y�,�y,�"a. ,. .Il,:iki, ..i.:.rit•;••,:�, ...y.•'^t,'1.� :..... ... . . . . ... ... . .. . _. ,,', -..:r. . s l - ,,i,;.: i u- - :�yy• yea .�:.-:; ^fir. 153 —4 r PAGE I OF 7 ' 18 19 4. f+ :££Pe;:£ 2 3 SE£P.G£ 3 '� i tn Ln I I^ - 200 yss s'r :a 1-7 •' o- I.`� t •kA1. ,.•j,,y v_r ��J`. ,.• If::RCN !nf r'%N:i r':'i). 44i6 11 ,1I l/5 - '.:,9,d9, j0 NOTE - SSESSORS 6LOCK H ASSESSORS b!AP III a.'' '• PAr:C£L SOMBERS BOOK 153 -^ PAGE 41 SHOWN /rV CI7CL ES COUNTY OF ORANGE .^..-.n:•. _ „S^ea:r.-;'. w^.^,^",+,i7'.>'J;:.;^.:;n -•r..•-r- •��;i• tP"Ti. .�^;iC. •;�c'K:`e' �S *•F1+ �'+ '+3 �"'s' -r.�'. ^'+f'4?F. .x' t"S^'".9 ..Y:i Z'•�.,=iL. _ L �.r�, :'i�C'.'' 'li.+ -:"f�a;t•+f"':� �, �...s �' �.t' hart ,s. �.`v. ••� ++) .�,. ,•<;S*� r: ,.� - s �` "�: -.�- ,�:s�+ i; ..z'f...�<. .�:?}°.. ,.K•.+.�_, y., c.' .r��""'..>�.�.., '�.+ F>r:.- �^ �-.t s��•- �•`�.�r'.,,,s-; ..,{..,. 2+"+,f: . .Y��+^•`I •}u2.... J• ,.,...�.d$'� �,":ir:".` y .is a err n},`+.;...+••r. ..w ,q,+ ",. ;,r. r. �, �,C-.. ;T-1S..r. r:�'' .r:+v?• F!.efi-•:^+". r+ S .t'S'.' +:i+..:4. '.t. ''1 uft.t.r ./S'S.ew:- -+.t.r.. ,3^:iw.•»...a ,� .��`t+. k, .k s •':'fit - \ h7 ++'+- :• n�, :,7„ ..l.l.� .,u•r....l..... .: .:1 rx•X�:,,.. r. /...y- ,2,a x .. 'rt' 1 � :;s'..�•:.. .,.• ,H -. •:ern, . , .. ' i ,a�- e`�gFx ':y � :•vF�i.c:'!�' f' 153- 412 413 PAGE ^ TRACT r 15M re, "=60 '• FOR. LOT d 57 io: ras `I6 O t5 a7 .31 <5 « cr cC - 35 JE 25 .\17 r6^ . I 2O 3 4O O5 `6 O 0 C .0 �II -22 13 14 �'�' rco Q -�- 1. —_-� •1 n ---I- — \'9 � • COVErVTRY LANE � Sg ' �J - •�� F co o.59<c. � �U •. • 6 1�41 i6 !a (Ci r04 � ct •• l4' " tU O77L! :��z�'2 C^� LANE t�j Q) LU 56 155 �5<I 51 �' 9� �; 1 •�. d 47 -l�6 �i5! ''VG. 44/6- rP xE s ti:-cx C ANE �6 �s. • .`.'C.Y /969 TRACT NO. 44/6 M. M 1?5- 46,49,50 NOTE ASSESSOR S ?LOCK b ASSESSOR S h1AP PARCEL NUMSERS 80GK 153 PAGE 412 So- .SHOWN IN -,IRCIf.S COUNTY Of ORANGE - ... � �.:.....,.:.. 'N.,'Y^.:- i'.V/•T• +'•ir!TV:'g5•-'i i.:;?:•,9,%. ..�� ?• �,",.i�r`-1.�;.�: , �c 153- 413 113 19 PAGE 3 Of 7 r �.,��• ------- ARGYLE .----.,.----- OR/VE - �r 57 9e _ f_.... f sc — 97 :<< tl 3 30 �31 3Z <3� 34 \35 3� 4, (5G 96 , �' `S, �j �J ?O 71 77 7J 7� 7y •'S 77 �• I' \ 95 "3 53 5 94 37 -60 -62 �� ''1--� F:BL.4!iF•c•V„ (J/ir'�C (' :''J__.. ',�,?.4'• , NO. 4416 t:Fa CONTINEN7AL DRIVE 416 415 P"f A.)Ch' /969 TP4Cr NO. 4416 V At /75-48, 49, 50 '+OTE ASSESSORS SIOCx 6 ASSESSO4 S /.AP f`= �4 PARt'El NU!.AP.ERS 60C?X,153PAGE 413 �. SNCjNf.' !": C72Ct F'S COUtJTY Of CRANGE K4' ._.._.--...,, +-;.-r. ::•_...-,;:,,.rv,�•.,..:q.o�r..t-..ta'.:n7a Nv+:'T..,X3•;,.^?:".�„'F`'-`. r .. ' .y.,�. ;,. •Si'' .r�-c . ._:1:c i 153-414 19 PAGE 4 OF 7 ARGYLE DR!VE — 1 /" 46 a7 I� t.0 51 52 5J 54) TRACT r, ' • •r . i ,. IJ9 <G I4, 142�727 102 v •,2u '21 r21 r2S 25 1 h h I0J 5 r C•4 14 - .S- ;<y c6 ,<6 <• 4c ;<J 0 Q 51) r - .. :as B J 19 �cr t 30, _� �� -60 18 I 73 (31 M 110 h :9 v'I 66 G � 'IFjr I1 J 1 !, c J.16 33 (113 - - U 43 i2 4i - 309 n J 35 `J t, NO. r 416 (1) 169 168 167 166 /65 '164 r6J 162 16, /50 O _ 0 1 CONTINENTAL G'R/VE 41� 2 • Y Ml.RLN / 59 TRACT NO. 4416 M.M. 17.5-4f,49,50 NOTE -SS£SSOR B ni.x 6 ASSESSOR S MAP PARCEE rlt.:,+r.EERS BOOK L53 PAGE 414 ' C-D Si/1'•v;r! .tl rlprl�,;; COUratY OF CiRA':GE .. ..... .. _....._ ... .._. .-. ,. ... - ... ......_ .-� .. ..._... -r^. .. �.-a•;,'4:'R;.C;;? .. _ .. r.crcn•,:..y".`t.7�•--••'•?2+w'Ym:�,�;�?'S°�:Y�[%, x;.'•'clr? 153-14 39 \---1 r YORK ro wtv s AVENUE 94''. 7 :Sf 77. T�6 F�A TRA 7- TR i _ ( 4 (2�O 31 (43 ? I I "I 40 '.0 19 y. e. C4 C5 n DFLAFIEL.9 CIRCLE C4�(2 q IV 72 jo % 14 1 i I ' 142' to 2, 11 03 co 1�6 2�A 10 9' JO Lu 4: :'4 r�a r �, Ir :� . e2' 40' t—O' r< r25 E' 02 7, 1 j 53)51 77 5355 -1 F 9 I - //- i-_ �4� .J9�{o' j4 5 C') 71 fir. t l �1) t,12 13> `J7 {r'r —1� "r,: -51 A'O. 5 3 40 J4 47 MARCH 19611 M�. 6354 Y, M 2J7- NOTE 7'1?ACF ,/O. 5351'7 M. M. 2.5,"-"6 CC A G,1. 14 SHOWt-J Itl CJP U CIE� CO ,irY hI ORAGE CD1�;: M -10,FI1: M & 10 1 1 nPA &k N. t-2 9 a M '•• ,.may.. ,:r.::t%'y'y� ;��}"'1�•. �it ,:.y:: •ia. .� -; 53- 16 15 - -� -NW COR. SW.//f, SE//e,SEC.6.6-/0 _ r rRACr rRAcr TRACr 4 BlCKLEY DRIVE �? / l/ _ u 1 6 1 n?G1CCi 7SS 3i 1 /.456 *(CI 6 TRACT /.a69 A4(C/ O 8-2 tar�5 j •' N•O. 73/3 NO. 6357 1 � PET TSWOOD 357 /VO. 56/.: .............. 40 3�y� MARC/d- /968 TRACT NO. 635 :/M T.77-4.5ro+l3!NC NOIC ASSESSOR'S FLOCK a ASSESSOR'S AIAP RACT NO. 7.3/3 V/! 295-5 TO/O/NC.. PARCH r`:UMFERS F.00K153 PAGE' 16 CD TRACT NO. .56/3 %!M 333-I',' /wC srr )WN I CIRCLES CCIUNTr OF OR:.tr '{..' f{ � ... •� _.. .1�1 r T' .}+a�s��[vr.-."T7��'i.`:.. �� i 'u� .. - ,..-'??7". , � . APH: 1`.i;3-414-24 APN: :153-414-25 APN:: 153-••414-26 :John Mc_ Donnell Carlos Nerey Paul E. Brown 9900 Argyle Dr. 9904 Argyle Dr. 9908 Argyle Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92 646--4200 Huntington Beach C692646--4208 APN: 9::3-39-247 APN: 933--39-246 APH: 9::3--39--245 Albert M. Guerrero ` Armando Hool Armando Quiroz 811.0-C: Baymist Dr. !; 81.10-B Baymist. Dr. 137 W. Victoria St. Huntington I{each CA92646--2074 Huntington Beach CA92646-2073 Gardena CA90248 APN: 933-•39-240 APN: 933--39-262 APN: 9::3-39-264 M:i.chael. F. Lee Richard De-frank. Scott H . Turner 81.:10- D Baymist Dr. 8301 Drybank Dr. 8:1.1;i I:aymis t Dr-. No. E:: YS?. Huntington Beach CA92646-2074 Huntington Beach bA92626 Huntington Beach CA92646-2073 APH: 933-•39-26:1 ,j APH: 933-•39--260 APN: 933••-39--::6 i Uzi; I{;<trr•y J. Isr•nwn ;i Mary fic.ctl•i Yc•+l.ov:i.c::h Sharon I..; L..c:ae•f' 81.:1.`.i--B Baymist Lane ' e115•-A Baymist. Dr. 81.:15--D Baymist Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646-2073 puntington Beach CA92646--207;3 Huntington Beach CA92646--2073 ?;rN APN: 933-•.39-2 41 APN: 933••-:39-243 APN: 933-39-240 Richard Lewis, Beach Richard K. Synko James Melton 8120•-B Baymist Dr. E3120-I) Baymist Dr. 8120-••A Baymist Dr. Huntington Iteac_h CA92646-2075 Huntington Beach CA92 646••-2075 Huntington Beach CA APN: 9::3-39-•244 APN: 9::3--39-242 APN: 933-39••-238 Robert. I•=. Devone J. Alan Hines Seymour Ruhi.no•f•f 1: 120--E:: Baymist Dr. 8120-C. F<aymist Dr. E3130-C Baymist Dr. Huntington Beach C:A92646-2075 Huntington Beach CA92 646••-2075 Huntington Beach .CA92646 APN: 933-••39-•23/ APN: /.:ia-a/-.:..>6 APN: 93.3•-•39- <•.39 Steven R. Goldman Marian M. Goldman Theresa M. I-:vdakimo•f•f :John Willis Gillespie 81.30•• B Baymis>t. Dr•. 8130 Baymist. No. A 35 S. Delaware St. Huntington Beach CA92646-2075 Huntington Beach CA92646•-•2 075 Smyrna 9 „ , .gym rna DI:-�1�,�77 APH: 933•••39•-17'7 APN: 933-39-176 APH: 9::3-39--175 Mike- Al.:i. Damon E. RodrigUez Eleanor Gammage 19:1.05 f.; E,eac:hcresk Lane 19105-T+ T;eachc..reat Lane, 191.05 I:sc.>ac:hr..res>t: Lane No. A S ., Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach C:A92646.. 2083 <^t APH: 933-•39---17(:3 APN: 933- 39-186 APH: 9::3--39---18(3 Marvin Markham Christopher W. Sangdahl William J. Hall 19105-D Beachr..rest. Lane 1.9110-B Bear..hr..rest Lane 191.10--D I:eachcrest Lane Huntington Ieach CA92646-2083 Huntington Beach CA92646--2086 Huntington Beach CA92646-20£36 APH: 9::3 -39-:190 APN: 933-39--:185 APN: 933--39-•107 Sergio Soria Jack L. Grimes Mir_hael. D. Ki.nnee 19110--F Beachcres>t. Lane 19110-A Beachc:rest. Lane 19110-C: Beac.hcres>t Lane Huntington Beach CA92646•-2086 Huntington Beach CA92646••-20£36 Huntington Beach CA92646-20£:6 IT. APN: 933-••39-••189 APN: 9::3-39--174 APH: 9::3- 39-•173 Timothy J. Pirtle Walter Kratochvil Colleen Melody Robertson 't> :1.91:I.0 E. EtE•?:aC:fl/"Y'E?st Lane 19115••-F Eteac.hcrest Lane 1911.5•-•E- Eic•?.txE-hr_r•e >t. l..ancr Huntington t'.i.ngton Beach CA92646••-2086 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646.. O£:3 APH: 9::3-39--•-1.70 APH: 9::3-39-••172 APN: ci 33-39-•17:1' `'`• :James F . Ste'fl Thomas Tatsuo Tamura Ralph Mos ueir•a " a:.;. 19:1.:1.5-•Ft E<ear..hc.:res't Lane 19115-I) I:{eacFlcY'eF>'t Lane 19115-..0 E;E•?acFlr_YE?s,t Lane Huntington Ii{each CA92646••-2083 Huntington Iiceach C:A92646•-2083 Huntington Beach CA92646-20£33 APH: 933-•39••-1.69 APH: 9::3--39-••191 APH: 933•-•39--192 Neil Coak Barbara How Rhys Clark :19:1.:1.5-••A Be.ac::hcrest Lane 19120-A Bear..hcrest 19:1.20 I.<ear..hcrest. No. B Huntington Beach CA92646-2083 Huntington Beach CA92646•-2085 HuntiMgt.c:n•x Beach CA92646••-2085 APN: 933•••39•-•19 5 APN: 933-39-•194 APH: 9::3-••39-•193 s:> A. Lawrence Shermoen Phyllis Im Rudolph D. Tomes 19:120••-E Beac:hc::res:>t. Lane 3447 I:cc?lle River Dr_ 19120-•C; Beacherest Lane.? Huntington I{teac:h CA92 646-2085 Hacienda Heights C:A91745 Huntington Beach CA92646•-2085 . ......... APN: 9::3-•39--168 APN: 933-39-165 APN: 933-39-167 Royal Le Page Real. Estate Nancy A. Po'teete Sheila A. Cook—. 11045 W. Olympic Blvd. No. 1245 191.:.5 Eteachcres;'k l..anP No. A :1.9125•-•(:: IlE=ar..txcres>t L_jrie L..a<s Angeles i:A90064 Huntington EtErtiE=h CA92646••-2084 Huntington EtEaac:l'i (:A92646--10£:34 :... APNC 933 39-••:1.66 APi•1: 933-•39••-252 APN: 933-39--251 ai.mmy :Joe Harper Glen H. Tomita Gregory Rath 19125 Iiceachcrest. No. B 19130•-D Beachcres't. Lane 19130 C Beachc:rest. Lane :`: ,•... Huntington Beach CA92646•-•20£34 Huntington Beach CA92646•-2084 Huntington Beach CA92646--2084 :f ;. APH: 9::3-'•39'•-'253 APH: 9 33-39-••2`.i0 APN: 933--39- 249 Brenton Lloyd Murdoch Fred K. Kobayashi. Robert M. Morse 1525 E. Culver Ave. 19130•• B I:ceac..hc..resst. Lane 19:1.30-A Beac..hc..rest Lane Orange CA92666 Huntington Beach CA92646••-2 084 Huntington Beach CA92 646 2084 APN: 9::3--39-•2 54 APN: 933--39-257 APN: 933- 39-.259 Noel S. Call Aaniel I'i: Bir•man (hark J. Sahagi.an :19:135-•A Beachcres.•t Lane :19135--D Beachcresst Lane 19135-••F B achc..res>t Lane Huntington Beach CA92646-2084 Huntington Beach CA92646••-2084 Huntington Beach CA92646•-2084 is?:ti APN: 933-39-'256 APH: 933-•39-255 APH: 93 3-39-•258 Karl Kernell Jeffrey Claude hohri.ng Shannon M. Casey 6901 Loyola Dr. 19135-B I:ieachcress•t: Lane 19:135 E. Beac..hcresst Lane Huntington Beach CA92647 Huntington Beach CA92 646-2084 Huntington Beach CA92646-2 084 APN: 933-39-035 APN: 933--39-047 APN: 9::3-.39-036 fa Tos:>hi.ye A. Omote David A. Sabin Ne_+dra•faun Patton 9581. Bickley Dr. 95Ci2 I'ickley Dr. 9583 Bickley Dr. 1-unti.ngtn Bch C:A92646-4159 Huntington Beach CA9 646-4143 Huntington Beach CA92646•-41.59 APN: 933-39-04£:3 APH: 93 i-••39••••O;:3 APN: 933-•39--045 Gay J. Page William R. Deason Susan R. Grantham 95£:34 Bickley I)r. 9585 Bickley Dr. 9586 Dic.k:ley Dr. 92 i - t c I••Ic.u�i�t.i.nc7•ton I:tc_ach f.A;�._646--41•}a Huntington Beach CA,�._646••-•}1..,� Huntington Beach CA92646-4143 APH: 9::3- 39-034 APH: 933-•39•-•046 APN: 933-39-039 Norma L. I: mbree Gary Wyatt Ronald L. Campbell 9587 Bickley I)r. 958£3 Bickley Dr. 9591 Bickley Dr. Huntington Beach CA92 646••-4159 Huntington Beach CA92 646-4143 I-unt.ington Beach CA92 646-4158 APN: 933--39-•043 APN: 933-39-••040 APN: 933- 39-044 Ma<ssoud Mandavi Lucy J. Trotter Jerry W. Savage 9592 I:t:ic::l-:ley Dr. 9782 Sil.verst•:and Dr. 3326 S. Wood lawn Pl. Wig Huntington Beach CA92646--4144 Huntington Beach' CA92646 Santa Ana CA92707 APO: 933--39-037 APN: 933-39-041 APN: 9::3- 39-•038 k Jjmes G. B anv.i.11e , Heidi Hooper Derek K. Wangberg �..,"•"_ 1808:1. Fie:ldbury Lane 9596 Bickley Dr. 9597 Bickley Dr. ??Y; . . h•lurit.i.ngton Beach CA92647 Huntington Beach £;A92646-•41.44 I•ii.u•it.i.rtic•3•ton Beach C:A92646••-41.58 APH: 93 3-•39-042 APN: 933-•39-027 APH: 933---39--02E) F=riedhelm Pichler Michelle Wells Maher S. Dissi<.s<.so 8201 Holland Dr. 9601. Bick:ley Dr. 19202 Sherborne Lane Huntington Reach CA92647 Huntington Beach CA92646•-4157 Huntington Reach CA92646 APN: 933--39-02 5 i APN: 933-39-026 APN: 93.:i-39-031 Rachel R. Ballard ,:Ion L. Swann Belo N. Kellam 9605 I:;ir.:kley Dr. 9607 B•ickley Dr. 9621 Bic:kley Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646--4157 Huntington Beach CA92646-4157 Huntingtn Bch CA92646•-4156 APN: 9::3---39-•0 32 APN: 933--39-•029 APN: 933--39--030 Richard D. Rebd Keith L. Lewinger Patricia P. 1=reyer :1.0082 Spar Circle 24862 Camino Villa 9627 Dic:k.ley Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646 El Toro CA9:630 I- un ti.ng to Bch CA92646--41 56 Xv APN: 9::3--39••-1:16 APH: 9 33-39-051 APH: 933•••39•• 119 . Margaret Brander Swanson Steven D. Wilkins Mildred June Wolf 21.06:1. Amberw:i.c.:k. Lane 20071' :F.nter•ior L..anc:r 12 Eiha:Ll.oKi Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 Laguna Niguel CA92677 ?K.' APH: 933- 39-052 APN: 933--39-116 APH: 933 ::i9- O[}9 r.; Richard W. Kohnow Anthony G. Soulias Casey Holcomb 9644 Bic:kley Dr. 9645 Bir_kley Dr. 9646 Bir..kley Dr. Huntington I:ceach CA92646-4145 Huntington Beach CA92646-4155 Huntington Beach CA92646--4145 APN. 933-39-•11.7 APN: 9:i 3-39-050 APN: 9 3,5-39--122 Benjamin Allen Gillette Pamela.An Lalk Keith R. Snider 7922 Maestro Ave. 1541 Park. Lawn Rd. e.0. Box 8766 Canoga Park. CA91304 Hacienda Heights CA91.745 I::oc.cnt..ain Valley CA927013 APH: 933--39-1 30 APN: 93 3-39-123 APN: 933-39••-1 1 ?<'' Daniel. W. Schlegel Marvin P. Adler Warren C. Willsey 966Z Bickley Dr. B957 La Dona C:t. 9664 B:Lc:kaey Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646 -4146 Fountain Valley CA92708 1-k.ntingtyi Reach CA92646-41.46 APN: 9::3---39"120 APN: 933-39-1 c f3 APH: 933--39-•-121 s�c Patrick Michael I:t.loomer• Harold L. Rosen Darryl L. Cox �4 9665 I3:i.c:b:.a.ery Dr. 9666 Bir..l•::Ley I>r. 9667 Ftic:kley Ih••. Huntington Beach CA92646--4154 Huntington Beach CA92646-4146 Huntington Beach CA92646-41.54 t 1X APN: 933--39-•129 AF'hl: 9 3::i-39-110 APN: 93 3--39--126 Mary Ann Bassilio .:TuliUS 1='. 6)a1.1.US Robert De Cre<"scenti. 966£:3 Bickley Dr. 980 S. Hilda St. 9682 Bickley Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646•-4146 Anaheim CA92£306 Huntington Beach CA92 646--4147 APN: 9 33-39-"111 APN, 933-39-127 APN: 933-•3900£3 YM:fGUl_S Margaret Vicki Brocard Eileen M. Brooks:; 9683 Bickley Dr. 96£34 Bickley Dr. 9685 Bickley Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646--4153 Huntington Beach CA92646-41.47 Huntington Beach CA92646•-415;:i APH: 9.:3-39-124 APN: 933-39-109 APN: 933-39-•125 Mindy S. Isusic: Norbert Vi.11anyi Geraldine A. Florio 96£:6 Bickley Dr•. 9687 Bickley Dr. 9f.�88 Bickley Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646--4147 Hunti.ngtc:nl Beach CA92646 -41.53 Huntington Beach CA92646--41.47 :X APN: 9::3-•39-••11.4 APH: 933•••39-•1::i£:3 APH: 933-•39-115 Con•l•.:i.na B. "T•abler• Dora Cozad Robert. J. Romeo 970:1. Bickley Dr. 9702 Bickley Dr. B921 Bedel Dr. 1• unt.i"ngt•.n Bch CA92646-4152 Huntington Beach CA92646--4148 I••untingtn Etch CA92646 APH: 933-•39--139 APN: 933-•39-•11.2 APH: 933739-••136 Erwin. Sebesta Mary Frances Trujillo P AT"F- 1=rederick:. H 9704 Bickley Dr. 9705 Bickley Dr. 9706 Bickley Dr. Hunt.i"ngt.n Bch CA92646-414£3 Huntington Beach CA92646••-4152 Huntington Beach C492 646•-•414£:3 APN: 933•••39-1.1 3 APH: 933-39-1 37 APH: 9::3-•39-"•100 Carol A. Forney .:Tames D. Hi.leman Randall. C. `:ihrad 1.i.n 9707 Bickley Dr. 9708 Bickley Dr. 9711 Bickley Dr. Llc.ul t.i.ng t.c7n Beach CA92646-4152 Huntington Beach CA92646-414£3 Huntington Beach CA92646-4151 APH: 933•••39--134 APH: 933-39-•101. APH: 933-39-••135 C. Robert Arth Robert A. ,t.rach Ronald R. Morello 1.6581 Ensign Circle 971.3 Bickley Dr. 9714 Bickley WA.` -Huntington Eeach CA92649 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 APN r 9:33-••39•-•1.02 APH: 9::3-•19-132 APH: 9::3-•39-103 VA., Richard J. £:ubai.ti<s Jamie-Lou Chien Albert W. De L_orrn 9715 Bickley Dr. P.D. Box 7476 9.71.7 Bickley Dr. I" untdng•ton Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92115 Huntington Beach CA92646 p. APN: 933...39••-1;:3 APN: 933-•39--107 APN: 933-39-•:1.06 Nurr-y John Petrescu Allen H. Shomaker Robert. Grant Seitz 97:I8 Bick:ley Dr•. 18792 Lister Lane 9729 Bi.ck.:ley Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach C:A92646 Huntington Iiceach CA92 646 APN: . 9::i3-39-10 5 APN: 933-•39-•1.04 APN-. 9-3;:i-::i9-•096 Kenji A. Husk William Brc.uvier Ghazvini Modjan Rouhani. 8822 Sa:i.:lpor•t Dr. 9733 Bic:k::ley Dr. 1.9752 Bromley Lane Huntington Beach :A9:646 Huntington Ica _ i CA9264 6 Huntington Beach ( A9 S646-t 1: / APN: 933-39-•097 APH: 933••-39-098 APM: 933-•39ZO99 Jta.l. M. Stein William A. Ar<.,enerau I••r•anl<a.in E. ,.ione,:, :;:•:. 1 � �• a 2;:)182 Via Masala EI`i31 Larthorn Dr. .L i�7ti 4 I:<rom:Lt:./ L_.:inc. Huntington Beach C.A92646-4127 •I•rabuco Canyon CA92679 Huntington Beach CA92646 �:r APN: 933-39-094 APN: 93 3--39--09`•i APN: 933-39--•092 Ronald L. Barbi ck Robert Howard Keller Marjorie A. Davi 4064 Rousseau Lane 1.9774 Bromley 19776 Bromley Lane Palos Verdes CA90274 Huntington Beach CA92646••-4126 Huntington Beach CA92646-4126 Of- APN: 933-39-••093 APH: 9::3-39-OB6 APN: 9:3- 39-••085 Cheryl U. Brooks Ahmad Amoli Andrew Robert Coleman 19778 Bromley Lane 1422 Keel Dr. 19794 Bromley Lane Huntington Beach CA92646-4126 Corona Del Mar CA9262 5 Huntington Beach CA926404125 APH: 933•••39-0811 APN: 933--39-Oe7 APN: 933-•39--091 Foster Murphy Patricia Elaine Rei.der Ted S. Ozek.i. 19796 Bromley Lane 19798 Bromley Lane i0�.1 is 2 . � BromleyL_anE. Huntington Beach CA92646-4125 Huntington Beach CA92646•-4125 Hunt•ingt.n Bch CA92646-4124 APN: 933••-39-•090 APN: 9 33- 39-••089 APH: 933•••39-OBE3 ; Adele A. Kn►.Idt.s;on Roger E. Wiersma Mary 1=. B"t•t.s 19804 Bromley Lane 19806 Bromley Lane 86132 I:ce:l.lmead Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646-41.24 Huntington Beach CA92646-4124 Huntington Beach C:A92646 APN: :1.53••••413=-67 AF•'N: 153-•413-66 APN: 1.53--413•-•65 Henry Vil.l.a'.-enor• Patrick: 3. Barnes Charles L. Spencer 19742 Cambridge Lane 19746 Cambridge Lane 19750 Cambridge Lane Huntington Beach CA92646••-4217 I• untingtn Bch CA92646••-4217 Huntington Beach CA92646•-421.7 `a APH: :1.`.3-•4:13--64 APh`I: 153-413-63 APN: .15.3-413-6 Angie Salgado Hector Char_amaty Loren Abraham 19756 Cambridge Lane 19762 Cambridge Lane 9766 Cambridge Sit. Huntington Beach CA92646-4217 Huntingtn Etch CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92640 APN: 15 i•-t{13-61 APM: 153-•413_ 37 APN: 153-413-60 >. Kurt. E. Hansler Kenneth Barry Coduto Yakob Basner :1.07:1 Syracuse Dr. ; 19771 Cambridge Lane 1.9772 Cambridge Lane Sunnyvale C:A,' T0t37 Huntington Tsc:.<ar:a'i t;A9..646••••4211 I•is.u•i•l::i.nc.7ton Beach f A9._f.>46-••4:':'.7.7 •:.. i APH: 1.`3--413---`:i9 APN: 153-•-413-•-3E) APH: 153-••413-•5£:3 riry: Billy H. Thomas :.Ton 11. Maxwell Thomas Brun<.:>I•:ow 21.972 Yellowstone Lane 11.721 Norgrove Lana 19778 C:amhr:icicle l..&ne El Torn CA92630 Los Alamitos CA90720 Huntington Beach C:A92646-421.7 APN: 153--413•-39 APN: 153-413-••40 APN: 15 i•-•413-•57 Constance Joan Covey Nicolas Philip D. W l T P. L..andero.� Warner :1.9779 Cambridge Lane i 6376 Hartford Ct. 10041. Beverly Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646-4211 1 Chino CA9171.0 Huntington Beach CA92446 APH: 1.53--413-41 APN: 153-413-56 APN: 1.53-413-•42 Robert M. Horwath Connie Temple Noel. Martineau ..... ...:;. :19787 Cambridge Lane 19788 Cambridge Lane 9202 Aloha Dr. I•is.un•t.i.nclt.on Beach CA92646•-4211 Huntington Beach (;A92646-••42:1.7 I••Is.uit:i.nc:3•t.crn Bear_h CA92646 .... :: APH: 153--413-55 APH:: 153-413-•43 APN: 153-•413-•54 Kathleen Rose Kennedy Cora Lee Randolph Bonnie J. Candy 4704 Sepulveda Blvd. 19882 Claremont Lane 19796 Cambridge Lane Torrance C.:A90505 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 AM :I.53-..4:I.3-••01 AF:•I,I" I.53_..4:I.3....02 APH: .I.,>..s 4:I.3....O3 fas.r<.:>an Gill G. W. [_gb6r•t Carlene Watt 1974:1. Claremont Lane 173::4 Tr•amonto Dr. No. 0 7662 Vantage Dr. L•gntington Beach C:A92646-4220 Pacific Palisades CA90272 Huntington I:tear_h CA92647 APH: 1::3--413-05 APN: 153-413-..06 Suzanne M. Dayton Linda Louise Hagan Dennis F. Heinri-t'r. ;t,, 19757 Claremont Lane 19761 Clairemont. Lane:? 7707 Bateman i I 1-lisn-t.:i.nc •t.n li{ca-i C:A92646--4220 Huntington lic•+ar::h fA94646••-421:.0 I••lot.ists:m 'T'X7.70£:30 .... APN: 1 53!413--07 . APN: 153••-413-08 APN: 153-413-28 Juan Dillon Dolores E. Wishon Eugene L. Cich :1.726 Park. St 1977:1 Claremont Lane 21871 Vacation Lane Iii.uit.inytn Bch CA92648 Huntington Beach CA92646-4220 Huntington Beach CA92646 APH: 1.53-••4:I 3-09 APN: 1 3-4:13-27 APN: 153-413-10 Christina A. De Hertoghe Randolph R. Harthorn S. L. Purdy' :. s :19775 Claremont Lane 50B Navajo Springs Rd. 19779 Claremont Lane Huntington Beach CA92646-4220 T)iamond I<ar CA91.'7E>� Huntington Beach CA92646-4220 APN: 153-413-26 APN: 153-••413-11 APH: 153-413•-•25 Charles N. I'-'c: per• Paul. Veerkamp William S. Crowell 19780 Claremont Lane :1.9783 Claremont•. Lane 19784 Claremont Lane Huntington Beach CA92646-4221. Huntington Beach CA92646•-4220 Huntington Beach CA92646-4221 APH: 1`53-413012 APN: :L 3-•413-24 APN: 153-413-•13 Robert J. Kirschner Mehmet Altinyeleklioglu Lac Vu Chu 10787 Claremont Lane 19788 Claremont Lane 27182 Clariemont Pl. Huntington Beach CA92646.._4::20 Huntington Beach CA92646•-422:1 El Toro CA92630 ;:arid ';EFk' ,: APN: :L.`.ii-••4:L 3-:::::i AF'hl: :L 5;:i—•4:13-••1 t} ! APN: 1:i;:i--41::i--2::: P:'amon A. Mendoza David Pic::kford Camille Parent 19/9.. (:;:L.:tr•emon•t l..ana:. 19795 Claremont Lane 19796 Claremont Lane Huntington I:{each CA92646••-4221. Huntington Beach C:A92646.-4220 Huntington Beach C:A92646••-4221. APH: 1.53-412-01- APN: 153-412-02 APN: 153-412-O:i Marilyn S. Henderson Frieda Youngblood Woodrow W. Smith 7045 Worsham Dr. 1021:31. Parkview Ave. P.O. Box 8336 Whittier CA90602 Westminster CA9261:33 Long Beach CA9080B APN: :1`.3-••412.-04 APN: 153--412-•05 APN: 153-412-•06 John M. Wells (3ene Curry Wing Gong Hui 19756 Coventry Lane 19762 Coventry Lane 19766 Coventry Lane Huntington Beach CA92646-4237 Hunt•i.ngtn Bch CA92646•-4237 Huntington Beach CA92646-4237. AF'hl: 153-•412-07 APN: 153-412•-29 APN: 153-412-••08 Jeffrey A. Rogers Donald Andrew Chase Linda Stearns :1.9770 Coventry Lane 1977:1 Coventry Lane B581 Rogue River Ave. Huntington Beach C:A92646••-4237 I•ii.u•iti.ngton Beach CA92646••-4236 Fountain Valley CA92708 APH: 1.`3--412-09 APN: 153-412--2£:3 APN: 163--412--10 Ronald T. Mr_ Intyre Nancy C. Gilbertson John Frank. Magnant-e :19774 Coventry Lane 19775 Coventry Lane 9908 Argyle Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646-42 37 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 APH: 153-412--27 APH: 153-412-26 APH: 1`.3-••4.12-11 Val. S. Scoville I_ennard I-=eddersen Beverly Truelove 61.01. Dudrnan Ave. 19783 Coventry Lane 19784 Coventry Lane Garden Grove CA92645 Huntington Beach CA92646-4236 Huntingt-n Bch CA92646 APN: 153-412_25 APN: 153-412-12 APN: 1.53-412-••24 John Allen Briggs Nadine' Duncan Dawn Marie Warren 1.9.787 Coventry Lane 925 S. Velare St. 19791 Coventry L_ape I•ic.nti.ng•lon Beach CA92646-4236 Anaheim CA92804 Huntington Beach CA92646--4236 APH: 153--41.2-••13 APN: 153-412-23 APH: 1.53-412-•14 �!: Diane P. Penne-father Janet M. Williams Jesus Perez 1.9792 Coventry Lane 19795 Coventry Lane 19796 Coventry Lane Huntington Beach CA9264614237 Huntington Beach CA92646--4236 Huntington Beach CA9 646•-4237. i ,-c S>-c c-02 APN: 1.3 c1c 03 Larry I:e.l•z Mohammed SiddeE cT CharlE_an Allen 19741 Inverness Lane E3191 Bridgeport Dr. C3.:.2. .1.6 F'oxhal7. I)r. Huntington Beach CA92646--4242 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 APN: a"i;:—414.. 04 APN:. 1 3-_414-05 APN: 153-414 -•06 David M. Hayes Gross Family Trust ;Jc:n•i M. Maxwell, 209:12 Queens Park: Lane 9562 -I-.etland Dr. 11721 Norgrove Lane Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 Los Alamitos CA90720 i C. APN: :LS;:>-••414-••07 � APN: 1J;:i-•c;<a4-OC•3 AF•hl» 15,21-•414-21 Leslie V. Hazzard W. Gregory Leta Donald Mei.lrnan :1.9769 Inverness Lane 19771 Inverness Lane 19772 Inverness 1-unt.ington Beach CA92646-4242 Huntington Beach CA92646-4242 Huntington Beach CA92646-4243 APN: 4`•.3-•-•4:1.4••-•09 APN: :1.53-414-•20 APN: 1.53-•414•-10 Henry L_. Adams z Maria F. Sandoval. Kathleen L. Larsen n 19775 Inverness Lane 1.9776 Inverness Lane 19779 Inverness Lane Huntingtn Bch CA92646-4242 Huntington Beach CA92646••-4243 Hunti.ngtn Iicch CA92646-4242 �..". :-; .:; APN: 153-••414--1.9 APN: :L53-•414••-1:1. APH: 153-4:1.4-18 .`y'. Nadine D. Sk:u:i.ni.l•:. Michael. J. £:i:i.arla Robert V. Solorzano 197BO Inverness Lane 19783 Inverness Lane 19784 Inverness Lane Huntington Beach CA92646-4243 Huntington Beach CA92646-•4242 Huntington I<eachi CA92646-4243 W. ";,'. APN: 153-•41.4-12 APN: 153-4:1.4•-•17 APH: 153-414--13 Michael. P. White Alfred J. Borowicz Patti Dale Post :1.9787 Inverness Lane 19788 Inverness Lane 9431 Crosby Ave. Huntington Beach CA92646••-4242 Huntingtn Bch CA92646--4243 Garden Grove CA92644 APN: 1`i3--414--16 APH: 933-•39-.":19 APN: 933-39-2.21 Bret A. Masterson Carl. F. Schlegel. Donald limy Madison 19792 Inverness Lane 8120-B Islandview 8120--D Islandview Circle Huntington Beach f.:A92646--4243 Huntington Beach CA92646••-2064 Huntington Beach hA92646•••"2064 APN: 933-39••-222 APN: 933-39-•21 B APN: 933-•39-220 Dennis John Pike Leonard Kleeger Robert H. Scott 81.20 Islandview Circle 8120-••A Islandview Circle 8120•-•C; Islandview Circle Huntington Beach CA92646••-2064 Huntington Beach CA92646•-2064 Huntington Beach CA92646•-2064 APH: 933-•39-224 APH: 933--39-227 APN: 933-39-226 s;'.::. David Alan Kos><sak. Sharon Ann 1-'yc:i.or• Carol Ci.armoli £:3:1.25 D I<s.L.anclv:iF:w Circle F3125-A Island View Circle E3125-•B Is:landvi.ew Circle Huntington Beach C:A92646-2064 Huntington Beach CA92646•-2064 Huntington Beach CA92646••-2064 MIX APN: 933- i9--225 APH: 93.:)...'39-"22.:) AF'M: 153..[}1::'.-'.iF.) .. Stanislau4is Li. Christopher P. Krause Ivan J. De Meer 934:1. Darrow Dr. 81.25 -E Islandview Circle 19741 Kes>wic::k. L..ane., Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646-2064 Huntington Beach CA92646--4246 APH: 153-•412"-•55 APN: 153-412-54 APN: 153-412-53 Sondra L. Mi.t•.ho•f•f Neri.a Yomtoubian Topi.k. Family Trust :19745 Keswick: Lane P.O. Box 3595 P.O. Box 3311 1•ic.cnti.ngtn Bch CA92646••-4246 Newport Beach CA92660 Fullerton C:A92634 APM: 153-•41.2-52 Ai••'N: :1.53-412-51 APN: 153-412-50 Christopher Kirby Secretary of Housing tic Urb Kenneth R. Cmmerson :1.9761 Keswick: Lane 27`5 Bristol St. No. 250 19769 Keswick: Lane Huntington Beach CA92646••-4246 Costa Mesa CA92626 Huntington Beach CA92646•-4246 :;"s = APH: 153--412--30 APN: 1 i3-4:1.2-39 APH: 153-412-49 Clemeant 1. :?acnt�s George J. Larkins Deborah L. Wood All::'i. 3.1.651 Gilbert St. 6827 Pear Tree Dr. 19777 Keswick: Lane Garden Grove CA9264:1. Carlsbad CA92009 Huntington Beach CA926464246 h : APN: 1: -412-41APN: 1i;:i-412- 40 AF' L E . ,Jeffrey Paul. Albertson King Lue Susan B. Kiler 2355 Rutgers Dr. 197B3 Keswick Lane 19784 Keswick. Lane Costa Mesa CA92626 Huntington Beach CA92646•-4246 Huntington Beach C"A92646-4247 APH: 153--412-47 APH: 153-412-42 APN: 153-412--46 Charles P.' Ri.ley Daniel Jackson Lynn C. Bilawa c / 6<..f.�<_ E. Monita Wit. 19788 Ke�wic6.. Ur. 48,.i'i Lago Dr. No. :>0.1 Long Beach CA90803 Huntington Beach CA92646-4247 Huntington Beach CA92649 APH: 153-412-•43 APN: 153-412-•45 APN: 15:3-•412-44 John II. Mann Beverly Ann Carroll Sel.wanes R. Selwanes 689 Mission Ct. 8412 M6dale Dr. 19796 Keswick Lane Chula Vista CA92011 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646-4247 APH: 933-•:39--007 APN: 9.:3-39--•008 APN: 93*..,-39--005 Charles D. Lc.is Henry Hanada Lanson Quan ' 9552 Pettswood Dr. 21.822 S tarfire Lane 9556 Pettswood I r. Huntington I:teach (::A92646••••41:1.7. Huntington I:tc•:><ach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646....4:1.:1.:1. APN: 9::3--:39--006 APH: 9::3--39--003 APN: 9*33-,39-004 ITS Donald Craig Harchar Richard A. I-io:llingshetad Steven Thomas Apodaca 9558 Pettswood Dr. 15802 Grey Oaks 9564 Pettswood Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646•-41.:1.:1. Westminster CA9268 i Huntington Beach CA92646•-4:1.12 APN: 9;:3-•39-••001 APN: 93 3--39-•002 APN: 9.:3-39-01`i Gordon M. Weir Nation Marilyn G John P. Suber 9566 Pettswood Dr. 9568 Pettswood Dr. 18796 Santa Isadora Huntingt.n Bch CA92646-••41.12 I••Ic.u•i-L•i.ngton Beach CA92646••-410 %untain Valley CA9270£:3 APN: 9:33-39-••016 APN: 9::3-•39- 013 APN: 9::3-39-014 Ronald L. Borges Donald L. Marsey Bruno De Crescen'tis 9584 Pettswood Dr. 20452 C<•astlerock: Circle 9602 Innsbrook: Dr. Hun ti.ng to Bch CA92646••-41.:1.3 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington' Beach CA92646 APN: 933-39-••01.1 APN: 9 i::3--39-01.2 APH: 933-39--009 Patricia C. ThompAn Margot E. Forster Thomas E. Leach 9592 Pettswood Dr. 3022 Ocana Ave. 9596 PettswoodDr. <; ;;i: Huntington Leach CA92646•-41.1.4 Long Beach CA90808 Huntingtn Itch CA92646--4114 APN: 933-39-•010 APH: 933-39-•023 APN: 9::33-39-024 Steven J. Wiegmaru•i J<acl•:. C. Coleman Peter A. Leuc=k. 21041 Hagerstown Circle 9602 Pettswood Dr. 9604 Pettswood Dr. R.. Huntington Beach CA92646 Iluuitingtn Bch CA92 646--4115 Huntington beach CA92646 41.:L:a APH: 933-39-•021. APH: 933-••39•-02{ APN: 933-39-019 =.' Arthur H. Chase Caroline L. Oab:i Marc E. Bruno 9606 Pettswood I)r. 9608 Pettswood I)r. 9622 Pettswood I)r. s. I.-lu•i•tingtn Bch CA92646••-41.15 HuntingtonBeach CA92646--4115 Huntington Beach CA92646 4:1.:1.6 APN: 93::3-39-•020 APN: 9.:33-39-017 APN: 933-::39-01£3 'Tames Russell yand Keurs Ernest 1. Ter' •'-�,;:,.::,, William E. I•'srir_I:: hc.c.,.aE_1:1. W t Icrne.�• .. 9624 Pettswood Dr. 9626 Pettswood Dr. 96:31 Flounder Dr. SIT Hunting% Bch CA92646••-4116 Huntington Beach C:A92646-4116 Huntington Beach CA92646 APH: 933-39-••063 APN: 93::3-::39--064 APN: 933-•::39-061 Jaren A. Pugh Ronald I . Meza Nazar Aramian 9632 Pettswood Dr. 10779 Queensland 9636 Pettswood Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646-4117 Los Angeles CA90034 Huntington Beach CA92646-411.7 APH: 93 3-39-••062 r APH: 9::33-39-055 APQ 933-39-056 Arthur W. Brown .lames D. []tt. Mike Collier 96:38 Pettswood Dr. 9641 Pettswood Dr. 9643 Pettswood I UI-It•ingtn Bch CA92646-••411.7 Huntington Beach CA92646•-4132 Huntington Beach CA92646-41::3: AF'hl: 9a )-39'-0`3 APN: 933-39-•054 AF'N: 9��)-39-059 Savoy M. Bellavia Diane C. Nelson Robert M. Gaffney 1£:3269 Fallenlea•f Circle 9647 Pettswood Dr. 2010 Cooingreen Lane Fountain Valley CA927013 Huntington Beach, CA92646-4132 Encinitas CA92024 APN: 9.33--39--060 APN: 9 3-39--057 APN: 93:3-:39--0 5£3 Bernard F. Rutherford Timothy L. Aingworth Linda F. Gu•r.zi 9654 Pettswood Dr. 9656 Pettswood Dr. 965£3 Pettswood Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646-4118 Huntington Beach CA92646-4118 Huntington Beach CA92646-4118 APN: 933-•39-150 APN: 9::3-39-1.51 APN: 933-39-14£3 Irene Hill Danilo A. Trinidad Lorraine A. Be.lgurn 966:1. Pettswood Dr. 9663 Pettswood Dr. 9665 Pettswood Dr. Huntington Iieac:h CA92646-••4131. Huntington Beach CA92646-4131 Huntington Beach CA92 646•-4:I3:1. m APH: 9:33:39-•149 APH: 9::3-39--071 APH: 93 3-39- U7.' Clarence G. Larson Grace. Claus� <' William G. Busman 9667 Pettswood Dr. 9672 Pettswood Dr. 3035 Country Club Dr. Huntingtn Bch CA92646-4131 Huntington Beach CA9:2646•-4119 Costa Mesa CA92626 APH: 9::3-•39-•069 APH: 9.:3-•39--070 APN: 933-39--154 Mary LOU Green Michael J. Flanigan Kenneth C. Vaughan 30 :1.-••D S. Sycamore 1320 Arch Lane 'i'BI Pettswood Santa Ana CA92707 Hunti.ngtn Iich CA9264£3 Huntington Beach CA92646-4:I30 _ AT•H: 933-39--155 APH: 933-39-•152 APH: 9:33-39-1.53 David £3. Blitz Michael W. Bartusicl:: Alan T. ShiraI•:i. 76£i33 F•'et•t:>wooca I)r. 7685 F'F•. t t >wobr Dr. 16241 Osborne St. Huntington I:ear_h CA92646••-4130 Huntington Beach CA92646-41 i0 Westminster CA92683 APh1: 93 3-•39-••067 APH: 9 3-39-06£:3 AT'hl: 9 i i- i9- 065 Odiss Bazar•th Phebealice S. Forney Charles M.' Coarnber :1.6214 Pacific Coast. HWY 18655 W. Bernardo Dr. No. 459 21652 Hanak:ai. Cane Huntington Beach CA92649 San Diego CA921 7 Huntington Leach CA92 646 MY$ APM, 9::3-39-•066 APN: 933-39-142 APH: 933-39-143 Mi.11ian T. Beryer<.on Helen Smith Philip J. Troy 9698 Pettswood Dr. 2699 Seneca C t. 1.716 Bayou Huntington Beach CA92646-4120 Brea C;A92 6:_:1. Seal Beach CA90.740 APH: 933-•39-:1.40 APN: 93 i•• 39-141 APN: 9::3-39-146 1-40 Larry L. Leach Erik Theodore Sc :e-loth WLAr TCK Norma T 9705 Pettswood Dr. 2970 Repo<.sa Lane 9711 Pettswood Dr. Hunti.nc t.on Iic:•ach CA,�._646 4 .dEan ..A J.00� Bch .l Hu. .3 �i Linc to L�h CA92646 4i....£3 APN: 933739- 075 APN: 933••-39--147 APH: 93 3--39-••076 Carol J. Ru sznal:: John A. Murphy Charles H. Davis 971.:2 Pettswood Dr. 97:13 Pettswood Dr. 9714 Pettswood Dr•. Huntington Beach CA92646--4121 Huntington Beach CA92646••-41.28 Huntington Beach 9264 - APH: 933-39-••144 APN: 933-•39-073 APN: 933--39-1.4 5 Miyuk.i Nishicia Doris L. Hill Stanley L. Forster 9715 F'ettswood Dr. 19062 Tonga Lane 892B Canary Ave. Huntington Beach CA92 646-4128 Huntington Beach CA92646 Fountain Valley CA92708 APH: 9::3-39--074 APN: 933-39-••081 AF'N: ,9::3-••39-082 Elizabeth A. Mc Guinness David R. Martin Donald L. Marsey 736 14th St. 9722 F'ett-s>woocl Dr. No. 17 20452 C:as3>t-lerock Huntington Beach CA92648 Huntington I:ceac:h CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 APH: 933-••39-083 j APH: 933-39-••080 APN: 933-39-079 Cary Daniel Pao, Frederic 1. Fleischman Harald 0. (;czr].<:u::h £:08 Vincent St. 9732 F'e't.'tsswood Dr. :1.6700 Sill:.trHe St. Redondo Beach CA90277 Huntingtn Etch CA92646 Fountain Vly CA9270£:3 f PH: 9::3-39-078 APN: 933-•39-077 APN: 9::3--39••-•206 *r Frank Caringella Angela Delgado Harry B. Capella >!;�y: y..�. 9736 F•ettswood Dr. 9911 Bond Circle 19096-••C: Queensport Lane Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646-2069 •::a.,:. AF'hl: 933-••39-2 04 AF'hl: 933-••39--207 APN: 9.33••••39-•205 Richard Singley Diana hangel Patrick 0. Pierce 19096-•-A Queensport Lane 19096-D C3ueenport Lane 1831.2 F•ieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA92646••-2069 Huntington Beach C:A92646••-2069 Huntington Beach CA9264£:3 APN: 93 3-39-208 APN: 933-39-2 1.0 APN: 9::3--39-•209 Robert Thomas Morgan Paula Morgan David S. Mier Ni.kolaos John Bastass :1.9096•-•E Queensport Lane 6172 Gleneagles Circle 191.06•-•A Queensport Lane Huntington Beach CA92646--2069 Huntington Beach C:A9264£3 Huntington Beach CA92646-2069 APN: 933••-39-21.1 APN: 933- 39--21.2 APN: 933•••39--2:16 Mayer Chapman Patricia O'Keefe Borlase Michael J. Bonchon<sky 19106••••f.: [:2c.cec.-n_>por't. L_anE. 191O6-••D (ac.ieenspor't. L..ane•.•. 19116 I) Qc.cect.n.t>por"l. L_aine. ,,.,... Huntington Beach CA92646-2069 Huntington breach C:A92646 -^_069 Huntington Beach (:A92f.>46-<'_O6£:3 ?a` APN: 933••-39- 21.`.i APN: 933-•39-•-217 APN: 9.:3-•-39--213 Kevin R. We<stley Keith R. Ii+.l<ackwood Katayoun Hossein'r.adeh •15222 Nottingham Lane 19116-••E: Queenspar't. Lane 30£: 17 Ruel-lang Luis Qint:i-nc_Tt.on Beach CA92647 Huntington Beach CA92646••-2068 Rancho Palos Verdes CA A • IY7;. ;;'yS" APN: 93 i-:i9- S`a4 APN: 9 3-39-••265 APN: 933--39-••267 a•' William W. Wells Catherine Lacroix Robert J. Dixon 191.:16-•I:c Queensport Lane 1.9121-•A Queen sport Lane 19:121-C Queensport. Lance • Huntington Beach CA92646...2068 Huntington Beach CA92646--2070 Huntington Beach CA92646•..2070 APH: 9::3--39-•2613 APH: 933--39- 266 APM: 933--39--269 ;Jack Edward Rydell. Rosalie Diane Wyllie Andres E. Gallardo :19:1.::'.:L•-•D Queensport. Lane 191.::'.1.•• B Queensport. Lane 6553 Berry Ave. Huntington Beach CA92646..-2070 Huntington Beach C;A92646•-2070 Buena Park. CA90620 ;:;:•: !`iF�'hl. 7.:).:)-••39-•23 F APH: 733.._3 7.....:.J.? APN: 73.:)-39--232 Lynne G. McNamara Theodore C. Farber Harold J. Davies :.,:. :1.9:126 Clueensport Lane No. C :19126 D MueenApor•t. lane 19126-A Cluec+nspor t Lane Huntington Beach CA92646••-20.70 Huntington I:{eac:h CA92646-2070 Huntington Beach CA92646--2070 APN: 933--39-•2;:i3 APH: 933--39-••182 APN: 'i',:3-39-••1£:30 Daniel Louis Powers Mazi.n Musta•fa Jundi ;John A. Packard :19126-B Clueenspor•L• Lane £:3:LOEi-I) Surfline I)r .. 19::>::'.1 Sailwincl Lane x ...-., x.<. Huntington Beach CA92646••-2070 Huntington Iiear_h CA92646--2079 Huntington Beach CA92646 APN: 93 i-39-1.C:31. APN: /33- 39--179 APN: 933--39-1.£:3 Richard L. Cotter Elaine M. Margul.i.s ;John A. Packard :;. 8105- C Surfline Dr. B105 A Su crfl inE Dr . .19321 J ai lwind Lane `: .:• Huntington Beach C:A9264£:3 I•ic.u•i•l•i.ngton Beach CA92646••-2079 Huntington Beach CA92646 APH: 933-•39-•184 APH: 9:i;:i•••39-••19'7 APN: 933-•39-••19EI Marcus F. Waite Ardean Ladd Vi<si.th Dusitnanond 8:1.05-••F Eiur•flinr.•. Dr . 8110-•B Sur..fline Dr. 8110-•C Surfline Dr: ` r.'•, ':- Huntington Beach CA92646••-2079 Huntington Beach C:A92646-2080 Huntington Beach CA92646••-2000 APN: 9::3-39•-•199 APN: 933--39-1.96 AF'hl: 9 i::i—:i9- 16:i ;James A. Lawson Frank C. Lewis Susan Marie Counts 1.2304 Woodbridge S•l•.,. £:3110A Surfline Dr•» 8115-C Surfline Dr. Studio City CA91604 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646••-2079 APH: 933-39-•161 APN: 9.:3--39••-164 APN: 933-39-162 Clifford A. Sypher Dorothy Atkins Arthur E. Brunner 81:15••-A Surfline Dr, 81:15•-D Surfline Dr,. 8115•-B Surfline Dr. Huntington Beach C:A92646•-2079 Huntington Beach CA92646-2079 Huntington leach CA92646--2079 APNz 15 3--154-••::'6 APN: 153-••1.91•-•02 APH: 153--191-1.9 City of Huntington Beach Albert P. Stacy Marl•:. Mattingly P.D. Box 190 9861 Bond Circle 9862 Bond Circle 1• unt.ingt.n Bch CA91264a Huntington Beach CA9 h4h-;:3h01 Huntington Beach CA9:2646--3601 APN:: 153-19:1203 APN: 153-•191.•-•1£3 APN: 1.5 3-1.91•-•04 Paul M. Wisdom Huang •Tr:i Luang Rodol.fo F. Decristofaro 9t:3.7:1. Band Circle 9872 &.tend Circle 9891 Bond Circle Huntington Beach CA92646-::3601. Huntington I:ceach CA92 h4h••-::3h01. Huntington Beach CA92646••••::3601 APH: 1.`.i;:3-••191.--17 APN: 153-••191-••05 APN: 153-•191-•16 Gary Steele Lee L. Fisher Tien-Han Wu 989:2 Bond Circle 9901 Bond Circle :1.7391 Rob Fray Circle Huntington Beach C:A92 64h--3h01 Huntington Beach CA92646--3601 Huntington Beach CA92647 APH: 1.53-191•-•:20 APN: 153•-191-21 APN: 153-191.-2 Kati Kam Cheng Humberto Ocho.a Regan Bak•. Kusmes ':s::•:. 9861. Constitution Lane 9871 Constitution Dr. 9891 Constitution Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646-3648 Huntington Beach CA92646--3648 Huntington Beach CA91646-3648 ?;+: APH: 153-..191....23 APN: 153-154- `.i APH: 153-••1 54--24 Carl. lurchE.:r Philip Palacios Bruce W. Nichols 990:1. Constitution tut:i.on Dr. 19652 Elmsford Lane 19662 Elmsford Lane I••li.ui•t.i.nyton Iiccrac-h C:A92646•-3646 I•iuntingin Lir..l•i i.A92 f.>4h--::if.,].1 L.Ic.u7t.i.ngtn Bch CA92646-36].]. .:. APN: 1 53-1`i4-••:2;:3 APN: 153-154-22 APH: 153-••1,54-21 :Jaic:k. C. Cole Beverly M. Hancoc:k. Monique M. Maher 1.967:2 Elmsford Lane 196£:32 Elmsford Lane 19702 Elmsford Lane Huntington Beach CA02646-3611. Huntingtn Bch CA9 h46-3h11 1••Iunting•t•.n Bch CA9 h4h--361.1 APN: 15::3•-•1.54••-20 APN: 153•• 143- 16 APN: 153-14::3-17 >: ;John S. Richter ;Jerome N. Kutner Gerald L. Hill. 19712 Elmsford Lane 9682 :Innsbruc:k•. Dr. 9692 Innsbruck Dr. Fit.un•t•.:i.nct•t•.on Beach C:A92646••-36].]. I•iGunting•tn Bch CA9 h4f.>••-::ih].7 L4c.in•l•.i.ng•t.on Beach t:A9264e5--3617 AE'N: :1.5,'!-•-:L43) 10 APH: 15::3--142--18 APN: 15::3•-•:1.42-19 Rog"r 1:::: Osr..hman Faye I_. Boughton David A. Jackson ;. n�;; 9702 Ini•is>bruck. Dr. 97:21. Innsbruck. Dr. 401 W Brookhurs>t No. 108 1 Huntington Beach CA92646-3619 Huntington Beach CA926 46 -::3618 Anaheim C:A92801 _ - - .......... APN: 1 .191-47 APN: 153-191-64 APN: 1 � 191-48 John William Moreno .Sandra L. Golightly Steven J. Turansxy 9861 Moore Circle 9862 Moore Circle 9871 Moore Circle Huntington Beach CA92646-3605 Huntingtn Bch CA92646-3605 Huntington- Beach CA92646-360n APN: :1n3-191-63 Apw: 153-191-62 APN: 153-191-61 Rosaleen Donaghy Robert Sydow William Watts Rose 9872 Moore Circle 9e92 Moore Circle 9902 Moore circle Huntingtn Bch CA92646-3605 Huntington Beach CA92646-3605 Huntington Beach CA92646-3605 APN: 153-153-21 APN: 153-154-16 APN: 153-153-20 Jacqueline Rank. David A. Wells Deborah L. Snider 9671 Telhan or. 9672 Telhan Dr. 9681 Telhan Dr. `- Huntington jeach CA92646-3623 Huntington Beach CA92646-3624 Huntington Beach CA92646-3623 ` Apwv 153-154-17 APw: 153-153-19 APN: 153-154-18 Thomas D. Nielsen Roberto J. Ortiz Larry R. Trautman 9682 Telhan 9691 Telhan Dr. 9692 Telhan - Huntington Beach CA92646-3624 Huntingtn Bch CA92646-3623 Huntington Beach CA92646-3624 IWO `- Apw: 153-154-19 APN: 153-142-21 APN: 153-154-29 Kenneth Hekimian Shakil Khan . Craig J. Chandler 6601 Morning Tide Dr. 19582 Tibbett Lane 19592 Tibbett Lane Huntington Beach cA926*a Huntington Beach CA92646-3626 Huntington BdAch CA9264673626 ` APN: 153-154-28 APN:. 153-154-27 APN: 153-142-20 � Nickolas Mazzone' Mark Gregory nemmer Herbert 0. Schon � 19602 Tibbett Lane 19612 Tibbett. Lane i 19572 Tibbett Lane Huntingtn Bch CA92646-3626 Huntington BeacD, CA92646-3626 � Huntingtn Bch CA92646 ' APN: 153-153-16 APw: 153-153-17 *PH: 153-153-18 Joseph C. Giordano Manuel H. Flores ` Alfredo Miqueleiz 6861 Sunview `D�. 9682 Warburton Dr. 9692 Warburton Dr. Huntingtn Bch CA92647 Huntington Beach CA92647-4358 Huntington Beach CA92646-3612 ' - ' ^ APN: 153-151-20 APN: 153-151-21 APN: 153-151-22 Robert S. Tullock Walter 0. Baehr Robert Jenzer 9681 Woodlawn Dr. 14286 Baker St. 9701 Woodlawn Dr. Huntingtn Bch CA92646-3635 Westminster CA92683 Huntington Beach CA92646-3637 `i �y ' '` APN: :I.`i 3-4:1.2-.M3 APH: 1`'.i:3•"-4:1:'.. 59 APN: 1 5 3-•-4:1.4-7;:3 Continental Town House As Hunti.ngt5 Continental Town House As I•iunt.i.ngt" Continental Town House -As Huytington :1.9£:30:1. I:irook.hurs t. f.;t. 19801 Brook.hurst St. 19801 Brookhuis>t St.. Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 APN: 15 3-.4 1.3-68 APH: :1.53-41 3-••69 APM: 153-41.2-57 Cont.:i.nental. Town House As Huntingto Continental Town House As I• unti.ngtci Cont.i.nental. Town House As Huntington :1.9001. I:trook.hurst fit. 19801 Brook:hurs>t St. 1980:1 Brookhurst St. Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 APN: 153-•412---37 APN: :153-•412-36 APN: 15::3-••41 -•3`.i Gavin Alston Jose Soto 7s:>�.t -Ye Chen 9752 Argyle Dr. 9758 Argyle Dr. 720 Coastline. Dr, 1.; I-li.u•i•l•.:i.nc;Jt.ry I:cr_h (:A92646••-4204 I•ii.unt.i.ng•l:on I:+er<•ar..h (;A92646 f:ic•.a1:11. Beach f.;A90740 APN: 153--412-•34 APH: 15::3"-•41<2--33 APN: 153-412-32 Barbara L. High Hattie G. Phillips Sandra L. Morrey 9770. Argyle Dr. 9776 Argyle Dr. 9591 Adams Ave. I•iuu"i•l•ingtn Bch CA92646••-4204 (• unti.ngtn Bch CA92646 Huntington Beach CA92646 APM: :1.53••••412--"31 AF•'hl: 153--412--30 AF'hl» 1.53••••413•-2.9 Daniel. Leedy ken Fiore Sally I:- . Forsythe 1.0:1.21. Jon Day Dr. 9792 Argyle Dr. 9832 Argyles Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646 Huntington Beach C:A92646-4204 Huntington Beach CA92646--4200 APN: 15 3-••413-•::30 APM: 153-••413-•31 . APH: 153-413-••32 ; Gerald P. Follett i Donna L. De Armery Joan Halbearcl 98::36 Argyle Dr. 8542 Bayonne Dr. 98A2 Argyle Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646-4200 Huntington Iear.h CA92646 Huntingt.n I:ch CA92646--4200 APN: 1`.i:3-••4:13-•••::33 APH: 1`3-413-•,34 APH: 153-413--3 5 ;? Craig A. Danger Patrick M. Feurtey Donnie 6. Alexander 9844 Argyle Dr. 1.7757 San Clemente St. P.D. Box 9362 I-lunt.:i.ngton Beach CA92646•-4200 Fountain Valley CA92708 Fountain Valley CA92728 str`: too )V.. AF'1•I 1 5 i•-•413••-;:36 i APH: 153-••414•-•22 APM:: 1.`.3-414-•2 3 'Clark Gulliford Ion Di.al.ogu Loren Fi. I-iays:> 9£:352 Argyle Dr. 9£392 Argyle Dr. 9£:396 Argyle Dr. Huntington Beach CA92646-4200 ; Huntington Bearh CA92646•• 42 06 Huntington Beach CA92646-4206 /. APH z 933-39-2 28 APN: 933-39-•2 1 APN: 9 3-39- 29 Gerald "T rie<stcnan Michael. Wing Elisabeth A. Sarac_hm<an 4: 120-••A Sur•fline Dr. 8120-D Surf line Dr. 81.20--B Sur•f:l:i.ne Dr. Rio Huntington Beach CA92646-2079 Huntington Teach CA92646-2078 Huntington Beach CA92646 APN: 9::3-39-230 AFN: 933-39-•::03 APH: 9::3-•39•-200 Thomas R. Cook Mark Locke Corazon A. Bi.gl.ang••-Awa 81.20-C: f:ur•f:l.ine Dr. 28659 Clover Leaf Pl. 812B-•A Sur•fline Dr. Huntington Beach C:A92646--2078 Cas•t•,air_ CA91:.84 Huntington Beach CA92646-2079 A AP Q . a`.�::i••-lei-•o1 F'hl: 9::i::i--::i9-••:`O:L Af•'hl: S�::i,:r••:>9-::.0::. ••.: . Sondra Lee I"et•,t.inge.11 Allen M. Chariton School Fountain Valley Dist 81.25-••B Sur••fline Dr. 8125--C Surfline Dr. 9461 Talbert Ave. }: Huntington Beach CA92646-2079 Huntington Beach CA92646--2079 Fountain Vly CA9270E3 12456 Jeff Canavello Cathie Taylor 9911 Constitution Drive 9582 Woodlawn Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Don Koob Doris Mattingly , 9531 Woodlawn Drive 9862 Bond Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Jeff Moreno Earl Hayford 9861 Moore Circle 9531 Innsbrack Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Kevin Arnold Dorothy Flood 19512 Tuckahoe Circle 19471 Salmon Lane Huntington Beach, .CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hetty Olwin Conrad Epluy 9922 Moore Cir. 9788 Continental Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Curt Tiffany Bill & Tas Whitmore 964.1 Telhan Drive 9901 Moore Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Jack & Karen Cole Bill & Linda Rose 19672 Elmsford Lane 9902 Moore Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Jack Murphy Bill & Carla Gibson 7713 Pettswood Drive 9931 Moore Circle Huntington Beach, CA .92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Patricia Phar Paul & Lee Robbins 19512 Hartsdale Circle 9922 Garrett Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 James Read Jack & Monique Moltfu 19682 Education 19702 Elmsford Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Kathy Kulke I Resident 19552 Hartsdale Cir. 19279 Coventry Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 B. High Lyle & Beverly Wallace 9770 Argyle 19682 Elmsford Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 S. Smith Chuck & Violet Thomas 9872 Constitution Drive 19702 Education Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Steve & Lillian Tedlock Resident 9681 Woodlawn Drive 9951 Constitution Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 J. N. Kuther Michael Bryant 9682 Inhsbruck Drive 19909 Cheffield Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Charle Doman Resident 9911 Garrett Cir. 9951 Frederick Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Resident Dean & Anilee Francis 9742 Delsfield 19757 Inverness Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Harriet Richter Resident 19712 Elmsford Lane 9952 Bond Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 i Elain Hart Resident 9952 Moore Cir. 9952 Constitution Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Resident Jim & Debbie Reynolds 9761 Constitution Dr. 9921 Moore Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Gerald Mulholland Lydia Thayer 9922 Constitution Dr. 9611 Woodlawn Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, .CA 92646 Mr. & Mrs. Rudy DeCristofara Lynda Donohue 9891 Bond Cir. • 9631 Woodlawn Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Resident Florence Desierto 19843 Inverness Lane 9521-Warburton Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington .Beach, CA 92646 Ursula Basich Shakil Khan 9872 Frederick Cir. 19582 Tibbett Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 Barb Webber LeRoy Miller 10055 Slater 9601 Warburton Drive. Fountan Valley Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Resident Carl Zurcher 9682 Warburton 9901 Constitution Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Resident Mark Sobers 9511 Woodlawn Dr. 9592 Woodlawn Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Jean Abel Bill & Carla Gibson 9635 Cornwall or. 9931 Moore Cr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Resident Hetty Ina Olwin + 9602 Warburton Dr. 9922 Moore Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Jim Mossler Bill & Linda Rose 9911 Fredrick Circle 9902 Moore Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 David & Jo Waite Hal C. Bouley 9938 Garret Cir. 19126 Magnolia St. #101 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Frank P. Kovacs Jo Waite 9581 Telhan Drive 9932 Garrett Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Joseph G. Cannon Linda Goodfellow 9921 Bond Cir. 9931 Constitution Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Elaine Hart Lenard Guillen 9952 Moore Cir. 9511-Woodlawn Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Scott Poster Kevin Arnold 19412 Perch Cir. 19512 Tuckahoe Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Connie Pietrovich Curtis 0 Tiffany 9961 Moore Cir. 9641 Telhan Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 i Patricia Tegerstrand Craig Chandler 9951 Constitution Dr. 19592 Tibbett Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646• Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Catherine Baumdraher Mr. & Mrs. William Whitmore 9901 Moore Cir. 9901 Moore Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 John & Donna Baumdraher Mr. & Mrs. Tom Beezer 9872 Garrett Cir. 9961 Bond Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Steve Smith Resident 9872 Constitution Dr. 9816 Continental Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Charles Thomas Resident 19702 Education Lane 9902 Garrett Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Roger Guzowski Resident 9952 Constution 9962 Bond Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Gaylyn Meyers Teri Weckenkamp 9662 Warburton 9951 Bond Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Jessie G. De Mossa Frank P. Kovacs 9951 Garrett Cir. 9581 Telham Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 926466 Jean Abel Harry & Rosaleen Morri F 19796 Kingswood Lane 9872 Moore Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 f Mark Sobers 9592 Woodlawn Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Kevin•Mulholland ' 9962 Frederick Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Gil Hinojosa 9952 Bond Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Pat Lhau 14512 Hartsdale Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Marlene Genzer 9701 Woodlawn Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Harriet Richter 19712 Elmsford Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Resident 9893 Constitution Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Regan Kusmes 9891 Constitution Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 O .. Connie Brockway,City Clerk ,. City of Huntington Beach ` Office of the City Clerk ! r + P.O.Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 9264, ,. R F• r•j; 3 i' j AP 1530412038 .._,ell,�!—-_ George J. Larkins --_.. 6827 Pear Tree Dr. �z2 Carlsbad, CA 92009 M INGjpy oQ � cpUNTY CP LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING �Ivill"MILIM111t$tnIdili Ito IIllit lIII1,11ll L103 03 °LO South Huntington Beach Community Nursery School 19699 Education Lane Room 019,P.O Box 510 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648 Ph(714) 968-3592 May 1 , 1992 Dear Tumanian/Fountain Valley Partners III , As per the condition of approval . of the conditional Use Permit 91 -25, Item #3 CI , we are stating our needs for assistance to relocate the South Huntington Beach community Nursery School as follows : 1 )The need to identify a new location 2 )A55i5tance in paying the difference in rent for a two year period so we can identify and establish our fund raising programs 3 )A55istance with the physical move and any monetary costs 4 ) If all else fails, provide a mobile facility to be placed at the Oka School site We anxiously await your reply. Also let it be noted that we contacted Mark Eckhart of the F.V. School district to ask for financial relief in the form of waiving our rent for May/June ' 92 and he stated that if he did that if would put a negative mark on our record! We would appreciate any Positive input you can have in this situation. Respec uVY, Jill Vorbil President of S.H .B.C.N. S cc: Mayor Silva Michael Uberuaga c r. City Clerk/H . S. -� r' Mark Eckhart M � :r c c)_m CD r K CD r� �rnO ia. LZ r ^� T Pe. ?vs h r-rAD .ScAs v/ s•f mpApolri ! ��la� �— 0'j— �}t 3rockway,City Clerk Huntington Beach of the City Clerk '.O. Box 190 on Beach,CA 92648 \� F _ AF'M e 153-412-58 Continental Town 11ouse A<.- lion t:i.ng t ::�) :1.9801. Brook:hurst St. 011N6 HLm—tington Beach CA-92646 q�• _�-i; i•1T3E;1 92b4� ii := 3_.Li�3Z +t,++}�'1£�f'42— .T__— ---ru�iw�ii�Ti.iv r•iiv�-. •r'.%a�1.itr-..�_—._ ._ _.. HUNTINGTQN`MIT IWMTAL -__ - Q 17821 17TH ST #270 'US►.EN 3.. RETURN TO SENDER 4UNTY Ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING :kway, City Clerk — ntington Beach the City Clerk Box 190 :. i hn Beach, CA 92648 i AF'hl: 153-41.2—5 7 Hun t i.n g'l ;INGtp i As Con•tinc�ntal Town 1•ioLkse N� 19801 Drook'.hurst St. ;pvoef IlLkntil ►�„ tieaclnC(�92 G4<S WO y -u�ia�r�wiiiv Tii nr. ♦`r...i •'_i�r HUNTINGTON CONTIWNTAL 17821 17TH 5T #270 i U i IN CA `ic'�b��-cij6 RETURN TO SENDER VTY Ca LEGAL NOTICE - P G C PUBLIC HEARING , nie Brockway,City Clerk ty of Huntington Beach )ffice of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 - tington Beach, CA 92648 (-1F'N 1.53)-41.3--6F3 Cori-L•i.ne-ital. Tcawn I-•IcL(se nl- I. LA1-1tj.1.1gt TING :LW301. Brcnokhc.rrst St.,y Hc.trit:i.ncltori Lteac_h CF1•i'2646 CDR POR A,,, .1;Jt 3 f3r1 rf�l�Irn-.•.n-rstr—vi• r ►-::n•rr.�r-......�_. ' t t1t.\YC:1f\IJi1 7V - of/L. 7..t\f•J.1\ iNT1NGTC1! i rt-4TINENTAL- _ "1^�►r^r^" g 17821 17TH ST #273 Q rua t IN iA 4eblo-elj6 < fe 909 CP`��o RETURN TO SENDER. cp�NTY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING iie Brockway, City Clerk - .... of Huntington Beach - `fice of the City Clerk r�• ti U c P.O. Box 190 - '` �. Pi g ngton Beach,CA 92648 1F'hl e 1.5 3-10.3—_b9 t HLcn t i.nc3 t NtINGt ► C011- -Lr)1n•Lrkl lcawn (t: ��V O,y t5�Fy01. g�rc�ak.hur t CA 1 ' �•cc�t�t=h C(-14i 2646 `pLOR POR47Fo �� i•aurn la.n�t(�n ._. HUNT60-1 92b4b3005 1491 044�i11'Vg2 _ �.y r�rst�9ihYti(:7 1r yMMZ Eefi�SMED f of itiir7li\a/ii 1•7 l.a.f t� f►h/f''it\ - - ;-- :HUNTINGTON CONTINENTAL Qr 17821 17TH ST #2" Mi t IN CA 426W-213b RETURN TO SENDER �pUNTY CP LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING e Brockway,City Clerk of Huntington Beach __ �' = tit _ - - ice of the City Clerk (� P.O. Box 190 ngton Beach, CA 92648 _._.. . a- ...._.._ - = _ john W9.11is Gillespie 35 S. Delaware St. Smyrna DE19977 INGTp JQ \Mcoevoae7F° I{LIii '3`-.-ESPy- 1.;.�;•::.�, i t1CCt (.Eel- - [;�t,�,-'•E'_ti - t-ja. - -T-t''i� H t-Q(I ___.._ --- - - --- - - RETURN Ttl SEN£+ER - - - 2C FFk 17, ISO- LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING - pie Brockway,City Clerk _ y of Huntington Beach _ _.r _ .•, �= - _- ffice of the City Clerk ` ' ._ f wV �. P.O. Box 190 m _ - �=; g :ington Beach,CA 92648 <�? • ! ,, _ AWN: 15,35--412—,99 C011tinestal Town _ � y iOUse As t:.ngING W 19801 Brookl-iLtrs•t St. Q \NCU0.vOF7F �!� I U11't.l.l'7C9'ton Liec3Ch CA92646 _ HUNTIMTI3N CONTINENTA"E 17821 17TH ST #270 . TUSTlta CA 92bd0-21.36 RETURN TO SEMMt FppUNTY cP� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING e Brockway,City Clerk of Huntington Beach _ ice of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 igton Beach, CA 92648 iT t `• '; _ _ AF'N: 933-30 9-04 4 ` \ .Terry W. Savage 3326 S. Wc)od:Lawri �pNTINGTp�, Santa Ana CA92707 _NtORPOR4)FO �C' i�rTur'. Sz" N ra� µ O SUC A N 00;,ASS `FB 17 1909.so �\�O✓ °LINTY �a LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING — �- 3rockway,City Clerk K �� Huntington Beach of the City Clerk �.0. Box 190 -.on Beach,CA 92648 _ ,•- ....:._:.y-.= _..___... _ Ar l�l d 153-41.4-19 Nzkdine D. SkLd.ni.l:: :1.9780 Inverness L_anef I••lui- -U.ngt(:)n Lieacl•i CA9^646--#:42 3'- INGTpy =MtORPORA7, 9 COUNTY �a LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING y�0, y� STATE OF CALFORNIA County of Orange am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: i am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley t. -- issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: „PUBLICaNOTICE =; R ORDINANCE N0=�3,140z. .a,. '>;ANOORDvNANCE OF.,THE CI May 4, 1992 TY OF. HUNT,INGTON. BEACH_ AMENDING 9061° THEREOF—TO'!'PROVIDE CHANGE OrZONING'ON' REAA,PROPERTY! FROM: R1 TOVR.I1 P.SON •REAL• PROPERTIjiLOCATED AP= ,PRQXIMATELY 650 FEET SOUTH°`;OFF YORKTOWN AVENUE'�SOUTHWEST 'SIDE- OF-(EDUCATION :LANE-(DISTRICT MAP 6) SYNOPSIS:-_ .. �Ordin'anc`el.> o.' 31,40 ,ainends ,the;:City of�Hun• tington `Beach 1,0'rdInance :Code by,amending-Section 9061,Aistridt;Mapti6 to`re- sflect the change;of;zoning ;from Rtnto,R1,PD_..on.,real property located ap- proximately'650:feet south !of Yorktq, &d�southwest side:of=Ed'ucafion'Lane?Y °T.HE1U4 TEXT OF';THE OROINANCE IS _AVAIL=' I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the A;B:LE' IN;! THE CITY' CLERK 5 O,FFICE s.`- foregoing Is true and correc:L ADOPTED;,Iby.,the -City C.ouncil'pf�lfid'City of.Hun-- tiHdt6h bbach?4-an regular, Executed on May 1 tss— meetuig,held Monday, May y 2 4; 1992;'by`f.1he'following r �rol'f call Vole; at Costa Mesa, California. 'AYES:- C2Acilrnernmer : R:obi,taglil- `fIo61tgR-_ !Patterson;:Silya;MacAllister r�!Pf St:''Couhcilrnembe?s: Gr"een,ilNrnchell.-'`' ABSENT: Councilmembersi lKellyk Signature CITY OF Ht1NTINGT0.N BEACH, Connie Brook.I way,City'tClerk l C Pub1ished1,Huntington[ �Beacfi'r<"Independent�May, ;14;�1992 x' i 052 650 I PROOF OF PUSLICATION 7— CU�JNc/ CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC FARING 9_6ECT: LIGHTHOUSE LANE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-1, ZONE CHANGE N-0. 387 , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1152 and TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14390 PROPERTY LOCATION Northeast corner of Talbert and Newland PROPOSAL' Petition submitted by Tumanjan Development (Baytower, Ltd. ) for a proposed 140 townhouse development at the northeast corner of Talbert and Newland. Proposal includes: General Plan Amendment from CP (Commercial-Professional) to High Density Multi-Family Residential, Zone Change from CP (Commercial, Administrative and Professional Office) to PC (Planned Community) , Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map. PUBLIC HEARING LOCAY I I�� L,LOU L.. LJ �- City Council Chambers JL<< tJ 10200 Slater Avenue �=C Fountain Valley- IL COLO" L.LM" 4�� a c.rnL■ HE DATE AND < .n 4.m... a �q1 4 PL.st■TL ed_ 2126/92 , 7*30 Rama Bui j r1.TL f Wle■TMT A detailed description of the proposal is on file in the Planning Department at City hall, LA i C L. 112(ju Slater Ave. if you would like further a GeV C u � ��"� �•L infora,etion about this proposal prior to the public a' hearing, please contact the Planning Department in L. persoi a by phoning (714) 965-4425. The Planning Commission is requesti J participation. if you are unable to attend, you A• < soy submit written comments in favor of or in s opposition to the proposal. L .v roaWAM r Decisions of the Planning Commission are final �. 'W fta.a concerning Buildiny Movings, Parcel heaps, Conditional Use Permits, Review of Plans, Variances ~ and Environmental Det,aminations unless appealed = +• '� 4MA ~ in writinxj within 20 days to the City Council, _ 14� U.M.N 'air seating grounds for opl+eal. t s ioL.a LL ••fe• Cy = Lr■Y/ 0 F 20ft changes, General Plan Amendments and menu to the Municipal Code will automatically be scheduled before the Mayor and Council. Thank you. T+c■ �a �r ; �3 �d 3 i ��p11NT4/,y` CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY Bulk Rate u CIVIC CENTER (714)965-4400 U.S. Postage 10200 SLATER AVENUE, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-8030 PAID t�o�uJ Permlt No. 554 OUNTAIN VAUZY, i c:n•i 'B e tx c::h C::i.-t y I••I I Ic.cr7 t.:i.r7c� l.ra Itc:l7 CA 92648 I "OFFICIAL PUBLIC NOTICE"