Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Hearing to Consider Appeal Filed by Mayor Pro Tem Tom (P FCj "7CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION B r QQ , TO Fi/a;t,,f. .,, epartment/Division Head(s) FROM City Clerk DATE j//"5 )6' SUBJECT NEED FOR CITY CLERK S OFFICE TO BE INFORMED AS TO WHETHER DEFERRED CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEMS WILL EVER RETURN TO COUNCIL As time permits the City Clerk s Office will be copying RCA s that are in the City Clerk s Office Pending File to ask your department whether the item is to remain pending, deferred or continued or whether the item will not return to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency I am sending these inquiries to all departments as some items have more than one department involved The following is a partial listing of the City Clerks Office Pending File items i � a L c/ Cf vl IF NOT RETURNING TO COUNCIL, please sign, date, and send back form to Liz Ehring, Deputy City erk II or call her at x1559 so that we can permanently file the record 1 Date CB le xc City Council - Informational Only City Administrator- Informational Only G le\dererred doc J t CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION TO Gail Hutton City Attorney FROM Connie Brockway do City Clerk SUBJECT RLS No 2002 0417 - Police Department Civic Center Parking Lot Expansion DATE August 27 2002 Thank you for the attached opinion on the Public Hearing Civic Center Parking Lot Expansion I do have one question A public hearing has never been continued to a date uncertain however in the past few years Planning Staff has recommended a motion be made that the hearing be closed with decision continued to a date uncertain But as part of that motion that the Council direct that the subject of the hearing be readvertised and republished for the date that is later to be determined Please advise if this is still appropriate I This is what occurred in this case (See Minutes attached) CB le Attachments Copy of Legal Opinion RCA and Minutes of September 4 2001 G\CBMEMOS\2002cbmem\Lega10pin ton RLS20020417 doc HB CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH LOJZ INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION -8 12 1 TO CONNIE BROCKWAY City Clerk FROM GAIL HUTTON City Attorney DATE August 6 2002 SUBJECT RLS No 2002 0417 City Council Action Concerning Huntington Beach Police Department Civic Center Parking Lot Expansion INDEX Police Power Land Use Zoning Challenges to Land Use Decisions BACKGROUND Sometime in 2000 the City of Huntington Beach s ( City ) Public Works Department on behalf of the City s Police Department filed Conditional Use Permit ( CUP ) application No 00-39 for the purpose of expanding the existing 108 space Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center by an additional 90 spaces The City s Planning Commission approved the CUP but former City Councilmember (and now State Assemblyman) Tom Harman pursuant to the provisions of Huntington Beach MunrcIpal Code ( HBMC) § 248 28 A appealed the Planning Commissions approval to the City Council The Council originally heard Mr Harman s appeal on November 6 2000 and continued the public hearing to September 4 2001 On September 4t' the City Council again continued the public hearing but to a date uncertain and directed your office to republish and renotice the same In May of this year the Police Department informally notified you that the department did not intend to bring the project back to the City Council due to budget constraints QUESTION In light of the Police Departments new position on the project you have asked for our advice of what actions you should take ANSWER The Public Works/Police Departments should first be contacted and asked to submit a memorandum to you withdrawing the CUP application and the reason or reasons for doing so Mr Harman should thereafter be contacted and asked to withdraw his appeal as the appeal would now be deemed moot And finally the City Council who has maintained jurisdiction over Mr Harman s appeal should be asked to accept Mr Harman s appeal and then dismiss it qw/02memo/RL.S 02 0417 PD Parking Lot RLS No 2002 0417 August 6 2002 Page 2 As an aside we recommend that in the future public hearings at least in land use cases not be continued to uncertain dates in the future but rather to dates certain ANALYSIS Under HBMC § 24818 the City Council has jurisdiction to hear appeals from Planning Commission decisions approving CUPS HBMC § 248 20 D states that the Council shall hear the appeal as a new matter Section 248 20 D further states (T)he original applicant has the burden of proof The reviewing body may act upon the application either granting it conditionally granting it or denying it irrespective of the precise grounds or scope of the appeal As matters presently stand the City Council has retained jurisdiction over Mr Harman s appeal and as a consequence must make all future decisions concerning what happens to the appeal Our first recommendation is that the Public Works Department or the Police Department or both furnish you with a memorandum stating that the CUP application for the parking lot expansion project is being withdrawn the reason or reasons why it is being withdrawn and if and when these two City departments intend to further pursue the parking lot expansion project Please feel free to furnish a copy of this memorandum to the Public Works and Police Departments Once you are in receipt of the Public Works Department s/Police Departments memorandum Mr Harman s appeal will be rendered moot Our second recommendation is that you then contact Mr Harman furnish him with a copy of the Public Works Department s/Police Departments memorandum as well as with a copy of this memorandum and ask that he in writing withdraw his appeal If Mr Harman paid a fee to file his appeal we suggest that this fee be refunded to him 2 Our third and final recommendation is that once you are in receipt of Mr Harman s withdrawal request that you place the matter on the City Councils next agenda In your Request for Council Action ( RCA ) ask that the Council accept Mr Harman s withdrawal of his appeal and then dismiss his appeal Attach both the Public Works Department s/Police Departments CUP application withdrawal memorandum and Mr Harman s appeal withdrawal letter as 1 The Amencan Hentage Dictionary 2nd College Ed at p 813 defines moot as without legal significance or of no practical importance 2 In this regard HBMC§248 28 A states in pertinent part A City Council member may appeal a decision of the Planning Commission The appeal shall be processed in the same manner as an appeal by any other person but need not be accompanied by the fee prescribed for an appeal qw/02memo/RLS 02 0417 PD Parking Lot RLS No 2002-0417 August 6 2002 Page 3 attachments to your RCA 3 This opinion should also be attached to your RCA As an aside we recommend that in the future all City Council public hearings on at least last land use matters be continued to certain dates in the future not uncertain dates The purpose of our recommendation would be to avoid any argument by an appellant that the City Council took an unreasonably long period of time before rendering a decision on an appeal In this case in reviewing the minutes of the City Councils September 21 2001 public hearing concerning Mr Harman s appeal there is no indication that his thoughts were solicited or his approval obtained before the Council continued his appeal to a future uncertain date 4 CONCLUSION Please contact us should you have any additional questions in this matter GAIL HUTTON City Attorney l 3 Once the City Council accepts Mr Harman s withdrawal of his appeal and dismisses it the Public Works Department/Police Department would be free to file a new CUP application for the parking lot expansion and the one year requirement of HBMC§248 12 would not be applicable In this regard Section 248 12 provides If an application (in this case for a CUP) is denied and the decision is final no person may file a new application for substantially the same request for a period of one year from the date the action of the city is final except as provided in section 248 14 for denial without prejudice In this case the City s Planning Commission approved the CUP not denied it And the City Council never overruled the Planning Commission and finally denied the CUP Thus Section 248 12 s one year rule is inapplicable Nor is Section 248 14 applicable because neither the Planning Commission nor the City Council ever denied the CUP without prejudice 4 We note that HBMC§ 248 22 although it does not apply to the City Council states in relevant part An applicant may appeal the failure of the Zoning Administrator Design Review Board or Planning Commission to act on an application if the failure to act continues beyond a reasonable time and the time to act is not otherwise fixed by law pw/02memo/RLS 02 0417 PD Parking Lot (13) September 4, 2001 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 13 (City Council) Public Hearing —Approved to Continue Open, to a Date Uncertain, Republish and Re-notice the Appeal Filed by Former Councilmember/Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman of the Planning Commission's Approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00 39 (Police Department Parking Lot Expansion to Add 90 Secured Parking Spaces at City Hall, 2000 Main Street on the Northeast Corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue— (Public Hearing was Continued Open from November 6, 2000) (420 40) Mayor Julien Houchen requested to be recused from the hearing due to the close proximity of her business location to the subject area Mayor Pro Tern Debbie Cook announced that this was the time scheduled for a public hearing to consider the following Appellant Former Councilmember/Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman Applicant City of Huntington Beach Planning Department Request To appeal the Planning Commissions decision to approve the expansion of the existing 108-space secured Police Department parking lot by adding 90 secured parking spaces for a total of 198 parking spaces Location 2000 Main Street (City Hall northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue) Environmental Status Notice is hereby given that this item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act Communication received from Roger Hosmer dated August 27 2001 in opposition to the proposed parking lot expansion is included in the agenda packet Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk s Office by staff had been mailed published and posted City Administrator Silver presented an oral report regarding the request for a continuance of the public hearing item Mayor Pro Tern Cook declared the public hearing open The City Clerk responded that there are no public speakers however she restated for the record the following Late Communications that pertain to the public hearing Communication from Joyce Holmes dated September 4 2001 transmitting opposition to the proposed Police Department parking lot expansion Communication dated September 4 2001 from Frank and Darleen Yee in opposition to the expansion of the Police Department parking lot (CUP No 00-39) Attached are previously submitted letters from Keith and Joyce Holmes and Jeff Owens in opposition the expansion There being no persons present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed either written or oral the hearing was continued by Mayor Pro Tern Cook (14) September 4, 2001 Council/Agency Minutes - Page 14 A motion was made by Dettloff second Boardman to 1 Continue the open public hearing to a date uncertain on the appeal filed by former Councilmember Harman relative to Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and 2 Direct that the notice of public hearing be republished and re-noticed The motion carried by the following roll call vote AYES Boardman Cook Garofalo Dettloff Bauer NOES None ABSENT Green ABSTAIN Julien Houchen I (City Council) Public Hearing Opened and Continued Open to September 17, 2001 to Consider Adoption of Resolution No 2001 60 on the City Budget for Fiscal Years 2001 to 2002 and 2002 to 2003 (320 20) Mayor Julien Houchen announced that this was the time scheduled for a public hearing for the purpose of considering the City budget for Fiscal Years 2001 to 2002 and 2002 to 2003 The proposed budget for FY 2001/02 totals $277 283 890 including General Fund Expenditures of $133 037 248 The proposed budget for FY 2002/03 totals $267 051 408 including General Fund Expenditures of$137 999 795 The complete Preliminary Two-Year Budget proposal can be reviewed by the public from 8 00 a m to 5 00 p m Monday through Friday in the City Clerk s Office at City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach after Friday August 31 2001 Copies of the proposed budget are also available for public review at the Huntington Beach Central Library located at 7111 Talbert Avenue (Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue) and all branch libraries Copies of the Preliminary Budget Message and Summaries may be obtained by the public free of charge at the aforementioned locations Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk s Office by staff had been mailed published and posted City Administrator Silver delivered the PowerPoint presentation which was announced earlier by the City Clerk as a Late Communication City Administrator Silver referred to Slide Nos 16 titled Needed City Council Actions and Slide No 17 titled Budget Process Timeline stating the option available if needed to continue to an adjourned regular meeting for Study Session No 3 on September 10 2001 Councilmember Boardman inquired with regard to the five Orange County Coastal cities beside Huntington Beach listed in Slide No 8 titled Transient Occupancy Tax(TO7) as to which have Conference and Visitors Bureaus that are membership driven organizations Economic Development Director Biggs responded referring to the Late Communication announced earlier by the City Clerk from his department titled Transient Occupancy Tax in Main-Pier Redevelopment Subarea and Conference & Visitors Bureau Information Mayor Pro Tern Cook noted subsequent to a discussion of Slide Nos 11 and 12 titled Changes in Personnel in General Fund that basically there are no proposed budget cuts of city staff that in actuality there is a net addition of one position She asked the number of contract personnel positions being eliminated City Administrator Silver answered that there are eight three in the Administrative Services Department and five in the Public Works Department CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PLOO-57 R1 Council/Agency Meeting Held Deferred/Continued t qhl� o A proved ❑Eonditionally Approved ❑ Denied Jerk Ignature 1 J Council Meeting Date September 4 2001 Department ID Number PLO o 7 IRJ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR ACTION Z7 ri o SUBMITTED TO HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS i;;Z3; z 17�- SUBMITTED BY RAY SILVER City Administrators a PREPARED BY HOWARD ZELEFSKY, Director of Planning SUBJECT CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Huntington Beach Police Department Parking Lot Expansion - Continued closed public hearing from the November 6 2000 meeting) Statement of Issue Funding Source Recommended Action Atternatrve Action(s) Analysis Environmental Status Attachment(s) Statement of Issue Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal continued from the November 6, 2000 City Council meeting by former Council Member and Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman of the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 The request by the Public Works Department on behalf of the Police Department is to expand the existing 108 space Police parking lot at the Civic Center by adding 90 spaces The City Council continued the item to the September -T', 2001 meeting to allow staff to evaluate the proposal in conjunction with other anticipated Civic Center improvements The planning for new Civic Center improvements has not progressed as anticipated and the Police Department has indicated (Attachment No 1) that based on current economic conditions they wish to delay the request until after the upcoming two-year budget cycle Therefore staff recommends continuance to a date uncertain Recommended Action STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1 Motion to 'Continue Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and direct that the notice of public hearing be ^ republished and renoticed PL00 57 R1 2 08/27/2001 11 35 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 R1 Attachments) City Clerk's age Number No. Description 1 Police Parking Lot Expansion Memorandum dated July 25 2001 2 City Council Request for Action Report dated October 16 2000 RCA Author Amy Wolfe/Herb Fauland PL00 57 R1 3 08/20/2001 9 42 AM L I I \ I 1 G I HB ���Jil�i L CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION 1002 AUG -r P 12 �t TO CONNIE BROCKWAY City Clerk FROM GAIL HUTTON City Attorney DATE August 6 2002 SUBJECT RLS No 2002 0417 City Council Action Concerning Huntington Beach Police Department Civic Center Parking Lot Expansion INDEX Police Power Land Use Zoning Challenges to Land Use Decisions BACKGROUND Sometime in 2000 the City of Huntington Beach s ( City ) Public Works Department on behalf of the City s Police Department filed Conditional Use Permit ( CUP ) application No 00 39 for the purpose of expanding the existing 108 space Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center by an additional 90 spaces The City s Planning Commission approved the CUP but former City Councilmember (and now State Assemblyman) Tom Harman pursuant to the provisions of Huntington Beach MunIcapal Code ( HBMC ) § 248 28 A appealed the Planning Commissions approval to the City Council The Council originally heard Mr Harman s appeal on November 6 2000 and continued the public hearing to September 4 2001 On September 4th the City Council again continued the public hearing but to a date uncertain and directed your office to republish and renotice the same In May of this year the Police Department informally notified you that the department did not intend to bring the project back to the City Council due to budget constraints QUESTION In light of the Police Departments new position on the project you have asked for our advice of what actions you should take ANSWER The Public Works/Police Departments should first be contacted and asked to submit a memorandum to you withdrawing the CUP application and the reason or reasons for doing so Mr Harman should thereafter be contacted and asked to withdraw his appeal as the appeal would now be deemed moot And finally the City Council who has maintained jurisdiction over Mr Harman s appeal should be asked to accept Mr Harman s appeal and then dismiss it pw/02mLmo/RLS 02 0417 PD Parkin_Lot 4 t 4 RLS No 2002-0417 August 6 2002 Page 2 As an aside we recommend that in the future public hearings at least in land use cases not be continued to uncertain dates in the future but rather to dates certain ANALYSIS Under HBMC § 248 18 the City Council has jurisdiction to hear appeals from Planning Commission decisions approving CUPS HBMC § 248 20 D states that the Council shall hear the appeal as a new matter Section 248 20 D further states (T)he original applicant has the burden of proof The reviewing body may act upon the application either granting it conditionally granting it or denying it irrespective of the precise grounds or scope of the appeal As matters presently stand the City Council has retained jurisdiction over Mr Harman s appeal and as a consequence must make all future decisions concerning what happens to the appeal Our first recommendation is that the Public Works Department or the Police Department or both furnish you with a memorandum stating that the CUP application for the parking lot expansion project is being withdrawn the reason or reasons why it is being withdrawn and if and when these two City departments intend to further pursue the parking lot expansion project Please feel free to furnish a copy of this memorandum to the Public Works and Police Departments Once you are in receipt of the Public Works Department s/Police Department s memorandum Mr Harman s appeal will be rendered moot ' Our second recommendation is that you then contact Mr Harman furnish him with a copy of the Public Works Department s/Police Department s memorandum as well as with a copy of this memorandum and ask that he in writing withdraw his appeal If Mr Harman paid a fee to file his appeal we suggest that this fee be refunded to him 2 Our third and final recommendation is that once you are in receipt of Mr Harman s withdrawal request that you place the matter on the City Councils next agenda In your Request for Council Action ( RCA ) ask that the Council accept Mr Harman s withdrawal of his appeal and then dismiss his appeal Attach both the Public Works Department s/Police Department s CUP application withdrawal memorandum and Mr Harman s appeal withdrawal letter as ' The Amencan Hentage Dictionary 2nd College Ed at p 813 defines moot as without legal significance or of no practical importance 2 In this regard HBMC§ 248 28 A states in pertinent part A City Council member may appeal a decision of the Planning Commission The appeal shall be processed in the same manner as an appeal by any other person but need not be accompanied by the fee prescribed for an appeal rjw/02memo/RLS 02 0417 PD Parkin,Lot t RLS No 2002 0417 August 6 2002 Page 3 attachments to your RCA 3 This opinion should also be attached to your RCA As an aside we recommend that in the future all City Council public hearings on at least last land use matters be continued to certain dates in the future not uncertain dates The purpose of our recommendation would be to avoid any argument by an appellant that the City Council took an unreasonably long period of time before rendering a decision on an appeal In this case in reviewing the minutes of the City Councils September 21 2001 public hearing concerning Mr Harman s appeal there is no indication that his thoughts were solicited or his approval obtained before the Council continued his appeal to a future uncertain date 4 CONCLUSION Please contact us should you have any additional questions in this matter GAIL HUTTON City Attorney �,,� l 3 Once the City Council accepts Mr Harman s withdrawal of his appeal and dismisses it the Public Works Department/Police Department would be free to file a new CUP application for the parking lot expansion and the one year requirement of HBMC§ 248 12 would not be applicable In this regard Section 248 12 provides If an application (in this case for a CUP) is denied and the decision is final no person may file a new application for substantially the same request for a period of one year from the date the action of the city is final except as provided in section 248 14 for denial without prejudice In this case the City s Planning Commission approved the CUP not denied it And the City Council never overruled the Planning Commission and finally denied the CUP Thus Section 248 12 s one year rule is inapplicable Nor is Section 248 14 applicable because neither the Planning Commission nor the City Council ever denied the CUP without prejudice 4 We note that HBMC§ 248 22 although it does not apply to the City Council states in relevant part An applicant may appeal the failure of the Zoning Administrator Design Review Board or Planning Commission to act on an application if the failure to act continues beyond a reasonable time and the time to act is not otherwise fixed by law rjw/02memo/RLS 02 0417 PD Parkin,Lot CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RLS No ,,2-o,�- D REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES Assn To R Gail Hutton, City Attorney Date Date Request made by Telephone Department July 30, 2002 Connie Brockway 5404 City Clerk INSTRUCTIONS File request in the City Attorneys Office Outline reasons for this request and state facts necessary for City Attorney to respond Please attach all Dertinent information and exhibits TYPE OF LEGAL SERVICES REQUESTED ❑ Ordinance ® Opinion ❑ Stop Notice ❑ Resolution ❑ Lease ❑ Bond ❑ Meeting ❑ Contract/Agreement ❑ Deed ❑ Court Appearance ❑ Insurance ❑ Other Is Request for Preparation of Contract form attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No Are exhibits attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No Unless otherwise specified herein I If not for Council action, consent to the disclosure of the If for City Council action, desired completion date information contained in this RLS to all m e of the City Council Agenda Deadline Council Meeting 08/30/02 Signature of Departm t Head COMMENTS Please see the attached RCA and minutes from the 9/4/01 Council meeting relative to the continuance on the closed public hearing for the Police Department parking lot expansion The Police Department has informed our office per written communication which is also attached that it will not pursue republishing and re-noticing the appeal filed by former Council Member Tom Harman due to budget constraints Please advise the City Clerk s Office of the necessary action and disposition of this item such as sending to Council for an informational item to receive and file as the last minutes has the item scheduled for a future date Please contact Liz Ehring at x5405 if additional information is needed Thank you Attachments RCA and Minutes of 9/4//01 Communication from City Clerk to Police Department Memo from Captain Arnold cc Honorable Mayor and City Council le r G RLS\2002\Police Dept Parking Lot Expansion Routing ❑ GCH ❑ PDA I ❑ LB ❑ SL J❑__5 ❑ ADL ❑ SF ❑ JM ❑ This Request for Legal Services has been assigned to attorney extension His/her secretary is extension Notes File Name Date Completed WP No ❑ Shaded areas for City Attorneys Office use only r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RLS No REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES Assn To Gail Hutton, City Attorney Date Date Request made by Telephone Department July 30, 2002 Connie Brockway 5404 City Clerk INSTRUCTIONS File request in the City Attorney's Office Outline reasons for this request and state facts necessary for City Attorney to respond Please attach all pertinent information and exhibits TYPE OF LEGAL SERVICES REQUESTED ❑ Ordinance ® Opinion ❑ Stop Notice ❑ Resolution ❑ Lease ❑ Bond ❑ Meeting ❑ Contract/Agreement ❑ Deed ❑ Court Appearance ❑ Insurance ❑ Other Is Request for Preparation of Contract form attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No Are exhibits attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No Unless otherwise specified herein I If not for Council action, consent to the disclosure of the If for City Council action, desired completion date information contained in this RLS to all me bers of the City Council Agenda Deadline _ Council Meeting 08/30/02 Signature of Departm t Head COMMENTS Please see the attached RCA and minutes from the 9/4/01 Council meeting relative to the continuance on the closed public hearing for the Police Department parking lot expansion The Police Department has informed our office per written communication which is also attached that it will not pursue republishing and re-noticing the appeal filed by former Council Member Tom Harman due to budget constraints Please advise the City Clerk s Office of the necessary action and disposition of this item such as sending to Council for an informational item to receive and file as the last minutes has the item scheduled for a future date Please contact Liz Ehring at x5405 if additional information is needed Thank you Attachments RCA and Minutes of 9/4//01 Communication from City Clerk to Police Department Memo from Captain Arnold cc Honorable Mayor and City Council le G RLS\2002\Police Dept Parking Lot Expansion Routing ❑ GCH 1 ❑ PDA 1 ❑ LB ❑ SL FO JF ❑ A D L ❑ SF 1 ❑ JM ❑ This Request for Legal Services has been assigned to attorney extension His/her secretary is extension Notes File Name Date Completed WP No 0 Shaded areas for City Attorney's Office use only 1"1 !+ M - - -- -- --_- -- -__- -- ­ — -_ n n - - 7 In'1n-,I loll HUNTINGTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT� � FROM ;Ca'ptain A in o I d I4t, DATE vistonkV TO 4 } �,� �Intt►aljDATE r-s sx a� W e =� >� � a3� i� see fad dz z}� ft Ch1ef Lowe nberg�„�b �(Capt-Marriell► Cutshaw v,i= wf ° Wa Crawford �*' �! � H? �'�� �roOtherlL1z��u�i��`�� EW tt _ REMARKS $ ,at �rt g_ t "' w'1�,,,;� � g�v?�rfti r}�,� Wr- sr a'§-� y r r.r�,t�✓ r �.FY?` cp r C FYI mments to '�rt n r ' Y F R � �r aft f7 Oct ,� A.�h' ✓ 4.r" c �,^� y.✓.ti J 3'L 'Sd #t*x 6 "Please see meSOW-,, ,ircul ate rand return � �tl „ ,Please handle to conclusion r z �d �=d tNote and file ` Prepare reply for my signature �s,-7r "{':-BSI nand retufn� r Sri Y -L'471ease attend Kr ors j =a FD I;UNTINOTONi[IE` U POLI,E J CITY Of-HUNTING TONBEACH 'WT &F;AR'fMENTAL COMMUNICATION TO �� Department/Division Head(s) FROM �nie ®rocl-w"7a City Clerk DATE 7, �7oQa SUBJECT NEED FOR CITY CLERK S OFFICE TO BE INFORMED AS TO WHETHER DEFERRED CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEMS WILL EVER RETURN TO COUNCIL As time permits the City Clerks Office will be copying RCA s that are in the City Clerks Office Pending File to ask your department whether the item is to remain pending, deferred or continued or whether the item will not return to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency I am sending these inquiries to all departments as some items have more than one department involved The following is a partial listing of the City Clerks Office Pending File items IF NOT RETURNING TO COUNCIL, please sign, date, and send back form to Liz Ehring, Deputy City Clerk II :=t x1559 so that we can permanently file the record Date S Z16 gZ CB le xc City Council - Informational Only City Administrator Informational Only G le\deterred doc (13) September 4, 2001 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 13 (City Council) Public Hearing —Approved to Continue Open, to a Date Uncertain, Republish and Re notice the Appeal Filed by Former Councilmember/Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman of the Planning Commission's Approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 (Police Department Parking Lot Expansion to Add 90 Secured Parking Spaces at City Hall, 2000 Main Street on the Northeast Corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue— (Public Hearing was Continued Open from November 6, 2000) (420 40) Mayor Julien Houchen requested to be recused from the hearing due to the close proximity of her business location to the subject area Mayor Pro Tem Debbie Cook announced that this was the time scheduled for a public hearing to consider the following Appellant Former Councilmember/Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman Applicant City of Huntington Beach Planning Department Request To appeal the Planning Commissions decision to approve the expansion of the existing 108-space secured Police Department parking lot by adding 90 secured parking spaces for a total of 198 parking spaces Location 2000 Main Street (City Hall northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue) Environmental Status Notice is hereby given that this item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act Communication received from Roger Hosmer dated August 27 2001 in opposition to the proposed parking lot expansion is included in the agenda packet Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk s Office by staff had been mailed published and posted City Administrator Silver presented an oral report regarding the request for a continuance of the public hearing item Mayor Pro Tern Cook declared the public hearing open The City Clerk responded that there are no public speakers however she restated for the record the following Late Communications that pertain to the public hearing Communication from Joyce Holmes dated September 4 2001 transmitting opposition to the proposed Police Department parking lot expansion Communication dated September 4 2001 from Frank and Darleen Yee in opposition to the expansion of the Police Department parking lot (CUP No 00 39) Attached are previously submitted letters from Keith and Joyce Holmes and Jeff Owens in opposition the expansion There being no persons present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed either written or oral the hearing was continued by Mayor Pro Tern Cook (14) September 4, 2001 Council/Agency Minutes - Page 14 A motion was made by Dettloff second Boardman to 1 Continue the open public hearing to a date uncertain on the appeal filed by former Councilmember Harman relative to Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and 2 Direct that the notice of public hearing be republished and re-noticed The motion carried by the following roll call vote AYES Boardman Cook Garofalo Dettloff Bauer NOES None ABSENT Green ABSTAIN Julien Houchen (City Council) Public Hearing Opened and Continued Open to September 17, 2001 to Consider Adoption of Resolution No 2001-60 on the City Budget for Fiscal Years 2001 to 2002 and 2002 to 2003 (320 20) Mayor Julien Houchen announced that this was the time scheduled for a public hearing for the purpose of considering the City budget for Fiscal Years 2001 to 2002 and 2002 to 2003 The proposed budget for FY 2001/02 totals $277 283 890 including General Fund Expenditures of $133 037 248 The proposed budget for FY 2002/03 totals $267 051 408 including General Fund Expenditures of$137 999 795 The complete Preliminary Two-Year Budget proposal can be reviewed by the public from 8 00 a m to 5 00 p m Monday through Friday in the City Clerk s Office at City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach after Friday August 31 2001 Copies of the proposed budget are also available for public review at the Huntington Beach Central Library located at 7111 Talbert Avenue (Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue) and all branch libraries Copies of the Preliminary Budget Message and Summaries may be obtained by the public free of charge at the aforementioned locations Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk s Office by staff had been mailed published and posted City Administrator Silver delivered the PowerPoint presentation which was announced earlier by the City Clerk as a Late Communication City Administrator Silver referred to Slide Nos 16 titled Needed City Council Actions and Slide No 17 titled Budget Process Timeline stating the option available if needed to continue to an adjourned regular meeting for Study Session No 3 on September 10 2001 Councilmember Boardman inquired with regard to the five Orange County Coastal cities beside Huntington Beach listed in Slide No 8 titled Transient Occupancy Tax(TOT) as to which have Conference and Visitors Bureaus that are membership driven organizations Economic Development Director Biggs responded referring to the Late Communication announced earlier by the City Clerk from his department titled Transient Occupancy Tax in Main-Pier Redevelopment Subarea and Conference & Visitors Bureau Information Mayor Pro Tern Cook noted subsequent to a discussion of Slide Nos 11 and 12 titled Changes in Personnel►n General Fund that basically there are no proposed budget cuts of city staff that in actuality there is a net addition of one position She asked the number of contract personnel positions being eliminated City Administrator Silver answered that there are eight three in the Administrative Services Department and five in the Public Works Department CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH A - A W\�C) 1f�N� MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PLOO-57 R1 Council/Agency Meeting Held Deferred/Continued to A proved ❑ onditionally Approved ❑ Denied lerk ' ignature Council Meeting Date September 4 2001 Department ID Number PLO o 7 RJ Qz CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR ACTION ` SUBMITTED TO HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY RAY SILVER City Administrators Q a PREPARED BY HOWARD ZELEFSKY Director of Planning/Oz_� SUBJECT CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Huntington Beach Police Department Parking Lot Expansion - Continued closed public hearing from the November 6 2000 meeting) Statement of Issue Funding Source Recommended Action Alternative Action(s) Analysis Environmental Status Attachments) Statement of Issue Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal continued from the November 6 2000 City Council meeting by former Council Member and Mayor Pro Tem Tom Harman of the Planning Commissions approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 The request by the Public Works Department on behalf of the Police Department is to expand the existing 108 space Police parking lot at the Civic Center by adding 90 spaces The City Council continued the item to the September -r' 2001 meeting to allow staff to evaluate the proposal in conjunction with other anticipated Civic Center improvements The planning for new Civic Center improvements has not progressed as anticipated and the Police Department has indicated (Attachment No 1) that based on current economic conditions they wish to delay the request until after the upcoming two-year budget cycle Therefore, staff recommends continuance to a date uncertain Recommended Action STAFF RECOMMENDATION �, \ Motion to Continue Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and direct that the notice of public hearing be ^ republished and renoticed PL00 57 R1 2 08/27/2001 11 35 AM l REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 R1 Attachment(s) City Clerk's Page Number No. Description 1 LPoliceParking Lot Expansion Memorandum dated July 25 2001 2 uncil Request for Action Report dated October 16 2000 RCA Author Amy Wolfe/Herb Fauland I PL00 57 R1 3 08/20/2001 9 42 AM 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RLS No REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES Assn To Gall Hutton, City Attorney Date Date Request made by Telephone Department July 30, 2002 Connie Brockway 5404 City Clerk INSTRUCTIONS File request in the City Attorney's Office Outline reasons for this request and state facts necessary for City Attorney to respond Please attach all pertinent information and exhibits TYPE OF LEGAL SERVICES REQUESTED ❑ Ordinance ® Opinion ❑ Stop Notice ❑ Resolution ❑ Lease ❑ Bond ❑ Meeting ❑ Contract/Agreement ❑ Deed ❑ Court Appearance ❑ Insurance ❑ Other Is Request for Preparation of Contract form attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No Are exhibits attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No Unless otherwise specified herein I If not for Council action, consent to the disclosure of the If for City Council action, desired completion date information contained in this RLS to all mL�of the City Council Agenda Deadline GCS Council Meeting 08/30/02 Signature of Departm t Head COMMENTS Please see the attached RCA and minutes from the 9/4/01 Council meeting relative to the continuance on the closed public hearing for the Police Department parking lot expansion The Police Department has informed our office per written communication which is also attached that it will not pursue republishing and re-noticing the appeal filed by former Council Member Tom Harman due to budget constraints Please advise the City Clerk s Office of the necessary action and disposition of this item such as sending to Council for an informational item to receive and file as the last minutes has the item scheduled for a future date Please contact Liz Ehring at x5405 if additional information is needed Thank you Attachments RCA and Minutes of 9/4//01 Communication from City Clerk to Police Department Memo from Captain Arnold cc Honorable Mayor and City Council le G RLS\2002\Police Dept Parking Lot Expansion Routing ❑ GCH 1 ❑ PDA 1 ❑ LB ❑ SL ❑ JF ❑ ADL ❑ SF ❑ JM ❑ This Request for Legal Services has been assigned to attorney extension His/her secretary is extension Notes File Name Date Completed WP No ❑ Shaded areas for City Attorney's Office use only HUNTINGTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT,. " 'r FROM Captatn'Arnold '7;-. DATE ;,Y�, Untfo mtiDivision w$r-V In141al r DATE - �r l „ -4 �:'Ghief lowenberg v $Ja pt,Mamelli 411}' V�7- ap ,Thomasoy,e 4,ther v 17--k �-REMARKS {} 7 yis ,rt,t..���g,�x .ti �c t �.� r�,`k�", r L- � ��'> {•�� � FYI ~ } ���s� ✓ �_R zny� �-c i� � }d i '� "` '�� �S� � 'kS!�IF�.Cf 1 r`� ���� ��Y.,, �*�,�.1-A� 's 5 �sr"F ,;S •`'"' i x r'S� �. 4' �`�f�,t w . s �l ���Comments, �rt a �r r < � fit'fie-� Please see me q1 ^ti 3r� Circulate and return - f, - r-6 Xy iV Please�hanAdle tozconclusfon � ' r'����r{ V��s�x wA }<A Note and file—e"N---�t �w� '-ja �np 'Preparre reply for my signature Sfgn`and return 4 a'v r 1 r rx a..�,ar ri ri^z � 2r1, Please ttencsRdt � w s r psi a,�E y3 tfYe � I u;&,3a -rQ ate,Q" -M I s 13 pc_r- -ra cater J>%..f -rto 6"v(-t-% �sUNTIN�TO'f E,CAC'� P4L;;E HEti CITY OE-HUNTING TON BEACH 'O JA%&F;2F�MENTAL COMMUNICATION TO /-�� J Department/Division Head(s) tY7 FROM �nie Brock c5K� City Clerk DATE Q 7, SUBJECT NEED FOR CITY CLERK S OFFICE TO BE INFORMED AS TO WHETHER DEFERRED CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEMS WILL EVER RETURN TO COUNCIL As time permits the City Clerk s Office will be copying RCA s that are in the City Clerk s Office Pending File to ask your department whether the item is to remain pending, deferred or continued or whether the item will not return to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency I am sending these inquiries to all departments as some items have more than one department involved The following is a partial listing of the City Clerks Office Pending File items >rSte'E IF NOT RETURNING TO COUNCIL, please sign, date, and send back form to Liz Ehring, Deputy City Clerk it or c II her at x1559 so that we can permanently file the record Date CB le xc City Council Informational Only City Administrator - Informational Only G le\deferred doc (13) September 4, 2001 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 13 (City Council) Public Hearing —Approved to Continue Open, to a Date Uncertain, Republish and Re notice the Appeal Filed by Former Councilmember/Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman of the Planning Commission's Approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 (Police Department Parking Lot Expansion to Add 90 Secured Parking Spaces at City Hall, 2000 Main Street on the Northeast Corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue— (Public Hearing was Continued Open from November 6, 2000) (420 40) Mayor Julien Houchen requested to be recused from the hearing due to the close proximity of her business location to the subject area Mayor Pro Tern Debbie Cook announced that this was the time scheduled for a public hearing to consider the following Appellant Former Councilmember/Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman Applicant City of Huntington Beach Planning Department Request To appeal the Planning Commissions decision to approve the expansion of the existing 108 space secured Police Department parking lot by adding 90 secured parking spaces for a total of 198 parking spaces Location 2000 Main Street (City Hall northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue) Environmental Status Notice is hereby given that this item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act Communication received from Roger Hosmer dated August 27 2001 in opposition to the proposed parking lot expansion is included in the agenda packet Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk s Office by staff had been mailed published and posted City Administrator Silver presented an oral report regarding the request for a continuance of the public hearing item Mayor Pro Tern Cook declared the public hearing open The City Clerk responded that there are no public speakers however she restated for the record the following Late Communications that pertain to the public hearing Communication from Joyce Holmes dated September 4 2001 transmitting opposition to the proposed Police Department parking lot expansion Communication dated September 4 2001 from Frank and Darleen Yee in opposition to the expansion of the Police Department parking lot (CUP No 00-39) Attached are previously submitted letters from Keith and Joyce Holmes and Jeff Owens in opposition the expansion There being no persons present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed either written or oral the hearing was continued by Mayor Pro Tern Cook (14) September 4, 2001 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 14 A motion was made by Dettloff second Boardman to 1 Continue the open public hearing to a date uncertain on the appeal filed by former Councilmember Harman relative to Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and 2 Direct that the notice of public hearing be republished and re-noticed The motion carried by the following roll call vote AYES Boardman Cook Garofalo Dettloff Bauer NOES None ABSENT Green ABSTAIN Julien Houchen (City Council) Public Hearing Opened and Continued Open to September 17, 2001 to Consider Adoption of Resolution No 2001-60 on the City Budget for Fiscal Years 2001 to 2002 and 2002 to 2003 (320 20) Mayor Julien Houchen announced that this was the time scheduled for a public hearing for the purpose of considering the City budget for Fiscal Years 2001 to 2002 and 2002 to 2003 The proposed budget for FY 2001/02 totals $277 283 890 including General Fund Expenditures of $133 037 248 The proposed budget for FY 2002/03 totals $267 051 408 including General Fund Expenditures of$137 999 795 The complete Preliminary Two-Year Budget proposal can be reviewed by the public from 8 00 a m to 5 00 p m Monday through Friday in the City Clerk s Office at City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach after Friday August 31 2001 Copies of the proposed budget are also available for public review at the Huntington Beach Central Library located at 7111 Talbert Avenue (Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue) and all branch libraries Copies of the Preliminary Budget Message and Summaries may be obtained by the public free of charge at the aforementioned locations Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk s Office by staff had been mailed published and posted City Administrator Silver delivered the PowerPoint presentation which was announced earlier by the City Clerk as a Late Communication City Administrator Silver referred to Slide Nos 16 titled Needed City Council Actions and Slide No 17 titled Budget Process Timeline stating the option available if needed to continue to an adjourned regular meeting for Study Session No 3 on September 10 2001 Councilmember Boardman inquired with regard to the five Orange County Coastal cities beside Huntington Beach listed in Slide No 8 titled Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) as to which have Conference and Visitors Bureaus that are membership-driven organizations Economic Development Director Biggs responded referring to the Late Communication announced earlier by the City Clerk from his department titled Transient Occupancy Tax in Main Pier Redevelopment Subarea and Conference & Visitors Bureau Information Mayor Pro Tern Cook noted subsequent to a discussion of Slide Nos 11 and 12 titled Changes in Personnel in General Fund that basically there are no proposed budget cuts of city staff that in actuality there is a net addition of one position She asked the number of contract personnel positions being eliminated City Administrator Silver answered that there are eight three in the Administrative Services Department and five in the Public Works Department I do CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ��ob A W\11�1 WV MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PLOO-57 R1 Council/Agency Meeting Held Deferred/Continued to A proved ❑ Ponditionally Approved ❑ Denied lerk ignature _ J Council Meeting Date September 4 2001 Department ID Number PLO o 7 FU CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH � C REQUEST FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERSCn ti z SUBMITTED BY RAY SILVER City Administrator�4z.:1 Q) a PREPARED BY HOWARD ZELEFSKY Director of Planning/V_� 7___1 SUBJECT CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Huntington Beach Police Department Parking Lot Expansion - Continued closed public hearing from the November 6 2000 meeting) Statement of Issue Funding Source Recommended Action Alternative Action(s) Analysis Environmental Status Attachment(s) Statement of Issue Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal continued from the November 6, 2000 City Council meeting by former Council Member and Mayor Pro Tem Tom Harman of the Planning Commissions approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 The request by the Public Works Department on behalf of the Police Department is to expand the existing 108 space Police parking lot at the Civic Center by adding 90 spaces The City Council continued the item to the September ZT' 2001 meeting to allow staff to evaluate the proposal In conjunction with other anticipated Civic Center improvements The planning for new Civic Center improvements has not progressed as anticipated and the Police Department has indicated (Attachment No 1) that based on current economic conditions they wish to delay the request until after the upcoming two-year budget cycle Therefore, staff recommends continuance to a date uncertain Recommended Action STAFF RECOMMENDATION \ Motion to / Continue Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and direct that the notice of public hearing be republished and renoticed ' T I J PL00 57 R1 2 08/27/2001 11 35 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 R1 Attachment(s) City Clerk's Page Number No. Description 1 LPoliceParking Lot Expansion Memorandum dated July 25 2001 2 uncil Request for Action Report dated October 16 2000 RCA Author Amy Wolfe/Herb Fauland PL00 57 R1 3 08/20/2001 9 42 AM u 6 gT — � '.r a-� ✓ —?}'JG .� `yhtr� t "' y '.. ��lv ---y ,• 'b r. '_ J' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION r I TO �-� Department/Division Head(s) FROM rC-4on7hr-lie Brockwa U - " City Clerk DATE 7 SUBJECT NEED FOR CITY CLERK S OFFICE TO BE INFORMED AS TO WHETHER DEFERRED CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEMS WILL EVER RETURN TO COUNCIL F f As time permits the City Clerk s Office will be copying RCA s that are in the City Clerk s Office Pending File to ask your department whether the item is to remain pending, deferred or continued or whether the item will not return to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency I am sending these inquiries to all departments as some items have more than one department involved The following is a partial listing of the City Clerks Office Pending File items r f IF NOT RETURNING TO COUNCIL, please sign, date, and send back form to Liz hE r g Deputy City Clerk II or call her at x1559 so that we can permanently file the re o d Date CB le /f ` xc City Council - Informational Only City Administrator- Informational Only r> G le\deferred doc 16 IAd CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH A M�) �`�r�'' MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PLOO-57 R1 Council/Agency Meeting Held Deferred/Continued to A proved ❑ onditionally Approved ❑ Denied lerk ignature J ' M - t � Council Meeting Date September 4 2001 Department ID Number PLO,7 IRJ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR ACTIONh. �Y^ SUBMITTED TO HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ti z CX7 C-) SUBMITTED BY RAY SILVER City Administratorzwi a PREPARED BY HOWARD ZELEFSKY Director of Planning SUBJECT CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Huntington Beach Police Department Parking Lot Expansion - Continued closed public hearing from the November 6 2000 meeting) Statement of Issue Funding Source Recommended Action Alternative Action(s) Analysis Environmental Status Attachment(s) Statement of Issue Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal continued from the November 6 2000 City Council meeting by former Council Member and Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman of the Planning Commissions approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 The request by the Public Works Department on behalf of the Police Department is to expand the existing 108 space Police parking lot at the Civic Center by adding 90 spaces The City Council continued the item to the September ZT' 2001 meeting to allow staff to evaluate the proposal in conjunction with other anticipated Civic Center improvements The planning for new Civic Center improvements has not progressed as anticipated and the Police Department has indicated (Attachment No 1) that based on current economic conditions they wish to delay the request until after the upcoming two-year budget cycle Therefore, staff recommends continuance to a date uncertain Recommended Action STAFF RECOMMENDATION \ Motion to Continue Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and direct that the notice of public hearing be republished and renoticed ' J PL00 57 R1 2 08/27/2001 11 35 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 R1 Attachments) City Clerk's Page Number No. Description 1 Police Parking Lot Expansion Memorandum dated July 25 2001 2 Ci Council Request for Action Report dated October 16 2000 RCA Author Amy Wolfe/Herb Fauland PL00 67 R1 3 08/20/2001 9 42 AM r (13) September 4, 2001 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 13 (City Council) Public Hearing —Approved to Continue Open, to a Date Uncertain, Republish and Re notice the Appeal Filed by Former Councilmember/Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman of the Planning Commission's Approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00 39 (Police Department Parking Lot Expansion to Add 90 Secured Parking Spaces at City Hall, 2000 Main Street on the Northeast Corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue— (Public Hearing was Continued Open from November 6, 2000) (420 40) Mayor Julien Houchen requested to be recused from the hearing due to the close proximity of her business location to the subject area Mayor Pro Tern Debbie Cook announced that this was the time scheduled for a public hearing to consider the following Appellant Former Councilmember/Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman Applicant City of Huntington Beach Planning Department Request To appeal the Planning Commissions decision to approve the expansion of the existing 108 space secured Police Department parking lot by adding 90 secured parking spaces for a total of 198 parking spaces Location 2000 Main Street (City Hall northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue) Environmental Status Notice is hereby given that this item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act Communication received from Roger Hosmer dated August 27 2001 in opposition to the proposed parking lot expansion is included in the agenda packet Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk s Office by staff had been mailed published and posted City Administrator Silver presented an oral report regarding the request for a continuance of the public hearing item Mayor Pro Tern Cook declared the public hearing open The City Clerk responded that there are no public speakers however she restated for the record the following Late Communications that pertain to the public hearing Communication from Joyce Holmes dated September 4 2001 transmitting opposition to the proposed Police Department parking lot expansion Communication dated September 4 2001 from Frank and Darleen Yee in opposition to the expansion of the Police Department parking lot (CUP No 00-39) Attached are previously submitted letters from Keith and Joyce Holmes and Jeff Owens in opposition the expansion There being no persons present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed either written or oral the hearing was continued by Mayor Pro Tern Cook (14) September 4, 2001 - Council/Agency Minutes Page 14 A motion was made by Dettloff second Boardman to 1 Continue the open public hearing to a date uncertain on the appeal filed by former Councilmember Harman relative to Conditional Use Permit No 00 39 and 2 Direct that the notice of public hearing be republished and re-noticed The motion carried by the following roll call vote AYES Boardman Cook Garofalo Dettloff Bauer NOES None ABSENT Green ABSTAIN Julien Houchen (City Council) Public Hearing Opened and Continued Open to September 17, 2001 to Consider Adoption of Resolution No 2001 60 on the City Budget for Fiscal Years 2001 to 2002 and 2002 to 2003 (320 20) Mayor Julien Houchen announced that this was the time scheduled for a public hearing for the purpose of considering the City budget for Fiscal Years 2001 to 2002 and 2002 to 2003 The proposed budget for FY 2001/02 totals $277 283 890 including General Fund Expenditures of $133 037 248 The proposed budget for FY 2002/03 totals $267 051 408 including General Fund Expenditures of$137 999 795 The complete Preliminary Two-Year Budget proposal can be reviewed by the public from 8 00 a m to 5 00 p m Monday through Friday in the City Clerk s Office at City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach after Friday August 31 2001 Copies of the proposed budget are also available for public review at the Huntington Beach Central Library located at 7111 Talbert Avenue (Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue) and all branch libraries Copies of the Preliminary Budget Message and Summaries may be obtained by the public free of charge at the aforementioned locations Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk s Office by staff had been mailed published and posted City Administrator Silver delivered the PowerPoint presentation which was announced earlier by the City Clerk as a Late Communication City Administrator Silver referred to Slide Nos 16 titled Needed City Council Actions and Slide No 17 titled Budget Process Timeline stating the option available if needed to continue to an adjourned regular meeting for Study Session No 3 on September 10 2001 Councilmember Boardman inquired with regard to the five Orange County Coastal cities beside Huntington Beach listed in Slide No 8 titled Transient Occupancy Tax(TOT) as to which have Conference and Visitors Bureaus that are membership-driven organizations Economic Development Director Biggs responded referring to the Late Communication announced earlier by the City Clerk from his department titled Transient Occupancy Tax in Main-Pier Redevelopment Subarea and Conference & Visitors Bureau Information Mayor Pro Tern Cook noted subsequent to a discussion of Slide Nos 11 and 12 titled Changes in Personnel in General Fund that basically there are no proposed budget cuts of city staff that in actuality there is a net addition of one position She asked the number of contract personnel positions being eliminated City Administrator Silver answered that there are eight three in the Administrative Services Department and five in the Public Works Department do i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ��°� MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 R1 Council/Agency Meeting Held Deferred/Continued to A proved ❑Eonditionally Approved ❑ Denied Jerk r ignature � J Council Meeting Date September 4 2001 Department ID Number PLOO 7 � A CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHzz REQUEST FOR ACTION J o � QD Z7 ^7 SUBMITTED TO HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 'U = SUBMITTED BY RAY SILVER City Administratorow o h. PREPARED BY HOWARD ZELEFSKY Director of Planning/ 71-1 SUBJECT CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Huntington Beach Police Department Parking Lot Expansion - Continued closed public hearing from the November 6 2000 meeting) Statement of Issue Funding Source Recommended Action Alternative Action(s) Analysis Environmental Status Attachment(s) Statement of Issue Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal continued from the November 6 2000 City Council meeting by former Council Member and Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman of the Planning Commissions approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 The request by the Public Works Department on behalf of the Police Department is to expand the existing 108 space Police parking lot at the Civic Center by adding 90 spaces The City Council continued the item to the September -� 2001 meeting to allow staff to evaluate the proposal in conjunction with other anticipated Civic Center improvements The planning for new Civic Center improvements has not progressed as anticipated and the Police Department has indicated (Attachment No 1) that based on current economic conditions they wish to delay the request until after the upcoming two-year budget cycle Therefore staff recommends continuance to a date uncertain Recommended Action STAFF RECOMMENDATION �� \ Motion to Continue Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and direct that the notice of public hearing be republished and renoticed I-D �'` 10 57 R1 2 08/27/2001 11 35 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 R1 Attachment(s) City Clerk's Page NumberNo. Description 1 Police Parking Lot Expansion Memorandum dated July 25 2001 2 City Council Request for Action Report dated October 16 2000 RCA Author Amy Wolfe/ Herb Fauland ` 57 R1 3 08/20/2001 9 42 AM ,l r� vA,!L�T T A M"E T4 41. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To RAY SILVER City Administrator From RONALD E LOWENBERG Chief of Police Subject POLICE PARKING LOT EXPANS PLAN Date July 25, 2001 Our initial intent was to expand the police parking lot for current needs and future growth After we began the planning process, we encountered some minor neighborhood resistance but also encountered some significant cost increase requirements placed on the project by the Planning Commission Based upon current economic conditions, we have decided to delay any request for expansion until after the upcoming two-year budget cycle Using current approved project funds, we have reconfigured the entrance and gate systems and are awaiting responses to the RFP to repair and slurry-seal the existing parking lot Captain Arnold has met and discussed this with Bill Workman and has communicated our intent to Public Works and Planning REUJWA gsd cc Bill Workman Todd Broussard ✓ � 2-A CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 Council/Agency Meeting Held �O- W-Oo Deferr onti ue to -00 Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied CI Cl ignature Council Meeting Date October 16 2000 Department ID Number PLOO-57 V64QN6 CW-51z-b vkMo oz-CISIO Q 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH U T FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS— -_ J SUBMITTED BY RAY SILVER City Administrator a4d PREPARED BY HOWARD ZELEFSKY Director of Planning T� SUBJECT APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Huntington Beach Police Department Parking Lot Expansion) Statement of Issue Funding Source Recommended Action Alternative Action(s) Analysis Environmental Status Attachment(s) Statement of Issue Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman appellant of the Planning Commissions approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 This application represents a request by the Public Works Department on behalf of the Police Department to expand the existing 108 space secured Police parking lot at the Civic Center complex by adding 90 secured spaces Associated site improvements include perimeter landscaping perimeter fencing new double swing security gate and asphalt paving of a 0 7- acre landscape area at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue The Planning Commission and staff are recommending approval (Recommended Action) based upon the following ♦ General Plan goals and objectives for the continuation of public safety uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses and the provision of adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands ♦ Project compliance with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) Development Standards The project is in compliance with building setback and perimeter landscaping standards PL00 57 doc 2 1016/00 8 31 AM 1l/ REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 ♦ Project compatibility with adjacent residential land uses The proposed design as conditioned will provide adequate separation and landscape screening between the proposed parking area and adjacent residences The parking lot will be utilized for City owned vehicles only and parking on the easterly portion of the site will be restricted to detective vehicles in order to minimize noise impacts to adjacent residential areas The existing security gate will be replaced with a double swing gate to minimize gate related noise to adjacent residential areas Parking lot illumination will be designed to prevent spillage onto adjacent areas Noise will be mitigated by replacing the existing sliding gate with a double swing gate and by restricting parking on the easterly portion of the lot for detective vehicles ♦ The proposed parking lot expansion will permit the continuing operation of Police Department public safety services at the Civic Center site and contribute towards maintaining high quality levels of service and addressing community protection demands ♦ A decorative permanent perimeter screen wall will be constructed within 2 years from project approval to enhance the appearance of the project and views into the site On September 1 20QO an appeal to the Planning Commissions action was filed by Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman The cited reasons for the appeal are as follows ♦ Loss of open space at the Civic Center complex ♦ Impacts to adjacent residents ♦ Costs associated with constructing a block wall around the parking lot as imposed by the Planning Commission Funding Source Not Applicable Recommended Action PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION Motion to Approve Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with findings and conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO 1) Planning Commission Action on August 22, 2000 THE MOTION MADE BY KERINS SECONDED BY MANDIC TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (ATTACHMENT NO 5) CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE PL00 57 doc i 3 10/6/00 8 31 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 AYES LIVENGOOD MANDIC BIDDLE CHAPMAN KERINS SPEAKER NOES NONE ABSENT NONE ABSTAIN SHOEMAKER MOTION PASSED Alternative Action(s) The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s) 1 Deny Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with findings for denial 2 `Continue Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and direct staff accordingly Analysis A PROJECT PROPOSAL Applicant City of Huntington Beach Location 2000 Main Street (Northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue) Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 represents a request by the Public Works Department on behalf of the Police Department to expand the existing 108 space secured Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center by adding 90 secured spaces pursuant to Section 214 06 PS District Land Use Controls Public Safety Facilities of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO) The 90 secured parking space expansion will occupy the majority of the area at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue and will require paving of approximately 0 7 acres of existing landscape area The parking lot expansion is an extension of the existing Police Department facility and is proposed to be screened by a 10 ft high perimeter chain link fence with dark green fence fabric to match the screening of the existing parking lot A ten ft wide landscape area will be provided between the proposed perimeter fence and the property line along Main Street A 15 ft wide landscaped area will be provided between the perimeter fence and the Utica Avenue property line The existing sliding gate is proposed to be replaced with a double swing gate No modifications to the existing 7 ft high masonry wall and 20 ft wide landscaped area along the easterly property line are proposed Parking lot lighting will provide a minimum 0 6-foot candle with a uniformity ratio of 4 1 within the project site Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare PL00 57 doc -4 10/6/00 8 31 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 B BACKGROUND On March 3 1992 the Planning Commission conditionally approved Conditional Use Permit No 92-8 and allowed the expansion of the Police Department parking lot by 27 spaces The expansion involved extending the existing parking lot 67 ft into the landscape area towards Utica Avenue The parking lot expansion was conditioned to serve as a temporary parking facility until a parking structure was constructed at the Civic Center C PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND RECOMMENDATION On August 22 2000 the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit NO 00-39 Three letters against the project were submitted for consideration One speaker spoke in opposition of the project and expressed concerns about increased noise project lighting and loss of open space mature trees and recreational area The Planning Commission discussed issues relating to parking of employee vehicles the source of funds. for the proposed parking lot improvements the necessity of 24-hour project lighting the need to impose a maximum light level and DRB recommendations The Commission approved the project with modified conditions in order to mitigate any potential impacts to adjacent residential areas In summary the Planning Commission required the following modifications - Intensified perimeter landscaping to buffer the proposed parking lot expansion from adjacent residential uses - Replacement of 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio - Addition of trees between the access driveway and the paved parking lot to screen the parking lot from the residences to the east - Intensified use of shrub materials along Main Street and Utica Avenue - Replacement of the perimeter chain link fence with a decorative exterior block wall within two years of project approval - Restrict parking on the easterly portion of the site to detective vehicles only - Provision of cut-off or dimmed lighting after 10PM along the parking lots perimeter D APPEAL On September 1 2000 Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman submitted an appeal (Attachment No 2) of the August 22 2000 Planning Commission action to approve the subject proposal The cited reasons for the appeal were loss of open space impacts to adjacent residents and cost associated with constructing a decorative masonry wall around the Police Departments secured parking lot Since the projects approval by the Planning Commission the City has received an additional 12 letters opposing the project PL00 57 doc 5 1016/00 8 37 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 E STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION The three main issues are project impacts to adjacent uses loss of open space and required blockwall cost All three subjects are discussed in detail below Please refer to the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment No 5) for a complete analysis of the project 1) Impacts to Adjacent Single-Family Residential Setbacks The proposed parking lot will be located approximately 110 ft (20 ft alley + 20 ft perimeter landscape buffer + 35 ft driveway + 35 ft landscape area) from the existing single-family homes to the east and 75 ft (15 ft perimeter landscape buffer + 60 ft Utica Avenue right-of- way) from the existing residential properties to the south The existing 20 ft wide perimeter landscape area between the existing accessway to the parking lot and the alley to the east is proposed to remain An additional 35 ft wide landscape area will be provided on the west side of the driveway to separate and partially screen the proposed parking area from the properties to the east A 15 ft wide landscape area will be provided along the south property line to screen the proposed facility from residences across Utica Avenue (please refer to Attachment No 3) The proposed landscaping and the 110 ft and 75 ft setbacks will adequately separate and screen the parking lot from adjoining residential uses Lighting/Glare Lighting is proposed to be installed within the parking area The proposed illumination levels will provide adequate lighting to ensure personnel and property security Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east and south from potential light spillage and glare A lighting plan has been required to be submitted for review and approval prior to operation to ensure no impacts will occur The lighting plan will provide cut- off or dimmed lighting along the parking lots perimeter after 10PM Based on the proposed lighting plan shields and cut-off or dimmed lighting no impacts to adjacent residential areas are anticipated Noise It is expected that noise levels will increase as a result of the proposed 90 parking space expansion In an effort to minimize noise impacts to adjoining residential areas the proposal includes replacement of the existing sliding gate with a double swing gate The aforementioned measure will address noise generated by the sliding gate as it slides on its track and noise from cars driving over the track The proposed parking lot will be utilized for patrol investigative and support vehicle parking Investigative and support vehicles are used less frequently than patrol cars Therefore in PL00 57 doc 6 1016/00 8 31 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 anticipation of noise impacts generated by cars leaving and opening/closing of doors staff recommends that investigative and support vehicle parking be restricted to the easterly portion of the site which is adjacent to existing residential development This restriction will minimize parking space use by multiple vehicles during the day and night and associated noise impacts The proposed swing gate restricted parking and parking lot separation from adjacent residential areas will ensure reduction of noise impacts to the maximum extent possible 2) Loss of Open Space Land Use The proposed parking lot expansion will occupy the majority of the area at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue and will require paving of approximately 0 7 acres (30 492 sq ft ) of existing landscape area The area is not currently utilized for any specific function but does provide perimeter landscaping and contributes to the aesthetic quality of the Civic Center The parking lot expansion site is a part of the Civic Center complex and was never designated or anticipated as open space in the Civic Center Master Plan The applicable landscaping ratio for the Civic center site is 8% The proposed parking lot expansion and associated loss of landscaping will result in a reduction of 3% After the proposed parking lot improvements a total of 29% of the Civic Center Complex site will be landscaped Staff has concluded that the importance of continuing police services from the Civic Center Complex while maintaining adequate on-site landscaping and providing an aesthetic design for the project is consistent with the Civic Center Master Plan Landscaping/Screening The project area is currently landscaped with turf and contains six mature trees and three smaller trees within the central portion of the site In addition seventeen trees are located along the easterly area adjacent to the alley Implementation of the proposed parking lot will require the removal of the six existing mature trees in the central portion of the lot Staff recommends replacement of the 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio in accordance with HBZSO requirements The submitted conceptual landscaping plan provides minimal landscaping in the interior portion of the lot that is screened from public view and secured for safety purposes Intensified landscaping is proposed along the parking lot s perimeter in order to capitalize on aesthetic benefits and screening Staff supports the landscaping concept and recommends that additional trees be planted in the interior area between the access way and the parking lot in order to screen to the greatest extent possible the parking lot from the two story PL00 57 doc 7 10/6/00 8 31 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 residences to the east Staff believes that the proposed replacement of the existing mature trees at a 2 1 ratio and the recommended intensified landscaping will adequately screen and enhance the projects appearance from street frontages and adjacent residential development 3) Cost of the Blockwall Penmeter Fence Design A 10 ft high chain link fence with dark green fence fabric is proposed along the parking lot s perimeter to screen the vehicles from public view and provide security The proposed fence materials and colors are consistent with the adjoining parking lot expansion approved in 1992 Staff supports the proposed fence design on a temporary basis This is based on the fact that the previous parking lot expansion was permitted as a temporary parking facility and there are no near term or future plans to construct a multi-story structure to address the Police Departments parking needs However staff recommends that the proposed fence be approved for only a two-year period At that time the chain link fence for the entire secured parking lot (current parking lot expansion and 1992 parking lot) shall be replaced with a decorative screen wall compatible in design colors and materials with the Civic Center s architecture The recommended screen wall upgrade is consistent with previously imposed conditions on development along the City s Urban Scenic Corridors (Main Street Beach Boulevard Goldenwest etc ) and is intended to enhance the visual image of the project and the Civic Center Penmeter Fence Cost The total estimated project cost is $392 000 Of that amount $162 000 will be allocated to remove the chain link fence for the entire Police Department secured parking lot and replace it with a decorative masonry wall within two years Staff believes that the recommended perimeter block wall is necessary in order to improve the parking lot s appearance from Main Street and Utica Avenue provides increased security and screening and further reduces impacts to adjacent residential development The cost for the parking lot expansion is far less than the projected estimate of $1 500 000 necessary to construct a parking structure of comparable size Staff believes that the project as conditioned represents the best fiscal solution to the parking issue and mitigates impacts to adjacent residential development therefore staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed expansion PL00 57 doc 8 10/6/00 8 31 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 F SUMMARY Staff believes that the proposed parking lot expansion as conditioned will not adversely affect existing residential uses and be compatible with the surrounding area Staff recommends approval of the project based on the following ♦ General Plan goals and objectives for the continuation of public safety uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses and the provision of adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands ♦ Project compliance with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) Development Standards The project is in compliance with building setback and perimeter landscaping standards ♦ Project compatibility with adjacent residential land uses The proposed design as conditioned will provide adequate separation and landscape screening between the proposed parking area and adjacent residences The parking lot will be utilized for City owned vehicles only and parking on the easterly portion of the site will be restricted to detective vehicles in order to minimize noise impacts to adjacent residential areas The existing security gate will be replaced with a double swing gate to minimize gate related noise to adjacent residential areas Parking lot illumination will be designed to prevent spillage onto adjacent areas Noise will be mitigated by replacing the existing sliding gate with a double swing gate and by restricting parking on the easterly portion of the lot for detective vehicles ♦ The proposed parking lot expansion will permit the continuing operation of Police Department public safety services at the Civic Center site and contribute towards maintaining high quality levels of service and addressing community protection demands ♦ A decorative permanent perimeter screen wall will be constructed within 2 years from project approval to enhance the appearance of the project and views into the site Environmental Status The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states that minor alteration of public facilities involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing does not require further environmental review PL00 57 doc 9 10/6/00 8 31 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 Attachment(s) City Clerk's Page Number No. Description 1 Findings and Suggested Conditions of Approval 2 Appeal Letter dated September 1 2000 3 Site Plan dated June 9 2000 and Landscaping Plan dated August 4 2000 4 Narrative 5 Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 22 2000 6 Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated August 22 2000 7 Letters in Opposition and/or support RCA Author Amy Wolfe7Herb Fau%and - PL00 57 doc 10 10/6/00 8 31 AM h H H, �M' fT ENT 1 1 k y} FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERINUT NO 00-39 FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA The City Council finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states that minor alteration of public facilities involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing does not require further environmental review FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 1 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 request to expand the existing 108 parking space secured Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center complex site by adding 90 parking spaces will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood Based upon the proposed design and conditions imposed, adequate separation and landscape screening will be provided between the proposed vehicle parking area and adjacent residential uses A i m imum 110 ft and 75 ft buffer area will be provided between the parking lot and the easterly and southerly residential uses respectively Trees will be planted within the parking lot to screen paved parking areas from adjacent single family dwellings The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project approval 2 The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because the most easterly portion of the parking lot expansion area will be designated for detective vehicle parking only in order to minimize noise from frequent maneuvering into and out of parking spaces and from opening and closing vehicle doors In addition, the existing sliding gate shall be replaced with a double swing gate to reduce the noise generated by the sliding gate as it slides on its track and the noise from cars driving over the track 3 The proposed parking lot expansion will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance in addition to any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located A 10 ft wide perimeter landscaping area will be provided along the Main Street frontage in accordance with HBZSO requirements A 15 ft wide landscaped area along Utica Avenue will exceed peruneter landscape requirements by 5 ft Six (6) existing mature trees to be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio 4 The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan Land Use Element L U 2 Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure, utility infrastructure and public services (00c1822 1) LU 13 1 Provide for the continuation of existing and development of new uses, such as governmental administrative public safety, human service cultural educational infrastructure, religious and other uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses Public Facilities and Public Services Element PF I I Provide adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands and provide protection for the community from illicit activities and crime The proposed parking lot expansion will permit the continuing operation of Police Department public safety services at the Civic Center site and contribute towards maintaining high quality levels of service and addressing community protection demands CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 1 The site plan received and dated June 9, 2000 and landscape plan received and dated August 4 2000 shall be the conceptually approved plans with the following modifications a The landscape plan shall be revised to reflect replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of such trees, to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east Final tree selection shall be subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect b The landscape plan shall use ground cover throughout the project site to be reviewed and approval by the City Landscape Architect Intensified use of shrub materials shall be use along the Main Street and Utica Avenue perimeter landscape area c Parking lot striping detail shall comply with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Title 24, California Administrative Code (Code Requirement) d Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights of-way Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view (Code Requirement) e Energy saving lamps shall be used for parking lot lighting All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent"spillage' onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations Cutoff or dimmed lighting shall occur after 10 00 PM along the perimeter edge to mitigate any potential glare onto adjacent residential properties 2 Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed a A grading plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval (PW) b Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of grading permits and shall be referenced in the index (006822 2) s c A Landscape and Imgation Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Arclutect which identifies the location, type size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials an irrigation plan a grading plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a two to one ratio (2 1) with minimum 36 inch box trees and shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. (P`V) (Code Requirement) d A hydrology and hydraulic analysis for the proposed on-site drainage improvements shall be prepared and submitted for approval (P`V) e In accordance with NPDES requirements, a"Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer 'Best Management Practices" shall be identified and incorporated into the design (PW) f The grading/ erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD s Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control (PW) g The name and Phone number of the contractor's field supervisor who will be on-site shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Public Works Department In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site at 250 ft intervals indicating whom to contact for information regarding this development and any construction/ grading activity This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity He/she will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities, truck routes, construction hours, noise, etc Signs shall include the telephone number of the contractor's contact person, the City's contact person (Jack Miller at 714-536-5517) regarding grading and construction activities and"1-800- CUT-SMOG" of there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No 403 (PW) h All property owners and tenants within 300 ft of the perimeter of the project shall be notified of a tentative grading schedule at least 15 days prior to such grading (PW) n If the import or export of materials is required, a truck haul route plan shall be developed and coordinated with the Public Works Department This plan shall include the approximate number of truck trips and the proposed haul route It shall specify the hours that transport activities can occur and the methods to mitigate construction related impacts to adjacent residents and public facilities These plans must be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval (PW) j Site plans and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls, walls and fences consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department Double walls shall be prohibited Prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls The (000822 3) plans shall include section drawings a site plan and elevations The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage 3 During grading and site development\the following shall be adhered to a Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available for use throughout the day during site grading to keep the soils damp enough to prevent dust from being raised by the operations (PW) b All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 8 00 a m and leave the site no later than 5 00p m , and shall be limited to Monday through Fnday only (PW) c Areas to be graded or that are being graded shall be thoroughly wet down in the late morning and after work is completed for the day (P`V) d The construction disturbance shall be kept as small as possible (PW) e All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface pnor to leaving the site to prevent dirt and dust from impacting the surrounding areas (PW) f Prior to leaving the site, all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site onto a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets and other access ways (PW) g Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403, particularly to mm=ze fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas (PW) h Wind bamers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site to enclose the work area (PW) 1 Use low sulfur fuel ( 05%) by weight for construction equipment j Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts), k Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts 4 Prior to final inspection the following shall be completed a All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including 1) Landscaping (PW) 2) Adequate space shall be provided between the swinging gates and the keypad operating the gate to pull-up with the gate closed (PW) b The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department (00c1822 4) c Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department d All building spoils, such as unusable lumber wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off site facility equipped to handle them 5 Prior to the operation of the secured Police Department parking facility the following shall be completed a A parking management plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to parking lot operation The submitted plan shall designate the two most easterly rows of the parking lot expansion area for investigation and support vehicle parking only b A lighting plan depicting proposed lighting fixture design and site placement shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to parking lot operation Parking lot lighting shall provide a minimum 0 6 foot candle with a uniformity ration of 4 1 within the project site Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare 6 The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project completion The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center architecture 7 The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council s action and the conditions herein If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS 1 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 shall not become effective until the ten calendar day appeal penod has elapsed 2 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is October 16, 2001 or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date 3 The Planning Commission reserves the nght to revoke Conditional Use Permit No 00-39, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs 4 The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein (00c1822 5) 5 Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7 00 AM to 8 00 PM Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays 6 All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner and in conformance with the HBZSO Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission (006822 6) ATTACHMENT Hb �q CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO Connie Brockway, City Clerk VIA Ray Silver, City Administrator r -FROM Tom Harman, Mayor Pro Ten&r DATE September 1, 2000 0 SUBJECT APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Huntington Beach Police Parking Lot) I am hereby appealing the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 for the expansion of the Huntington Beach Police Department parking lot located at 2000 Main Street The grounds for my appeal are 1 Loss of open space on the Civic Center complex 2 Impacts to adjacent residences 3 Costs associated with constructing a block wall around the parking lot as imposed by the Planning Commission TH SH rink xc Ron Lowenberg, Police Chief Howard Zelefsky, Director of Planning Scott Hess, Principal Planner Herb Fauland, Senior Planner Amy Wolfe, Associate Planner G\admltr\00\0900sh1 ATTACHMENT 7 x INOOKI ' I ' I ' ll� ----==---==----------------------- - - -- --_---_----_---. YT --YJ�YlY-_--_1•�3-� / ----- --- -------� -} I -------------------- —�T - 1 / li l ✓' ` I I ®fit , r / ' It / , U low r c w ' Ir r Io jr r r Ir �■ �■ r r r r r r r r • I H1���� ■ / I i` M / r In MW t Yt Yt Yr1 11 I s Mani MEE undr ound Svvb■ Alol �� ��r.M��-.■ r PREUMINARY LAYOUT ~ Cwt: Tau_ I I POLICE PARKING LOT EXPANSION +-aOD-411FNEE "—" HUNTINGTON BEACH CA r CITY OF HUNTINGTON MACH + ,•,.�.. r ...r «. ovrrna o nwuo.r.. �,�,L.�, �rrcua-�(v��aiuvx�watn�er•ms 31 t J>, u � •I�1 ���'��.2Y•�iM�.�...1s��.�.7j'�pe..�w.u.wiw t r<? S t r* ! �� i M ' i 7rt t l It f'gg j r, S �I I e +1�r t ` 4rg����'BtRTDS � I I i'k 1 i � t P1kB�e n S in t ltnP a �F _ `—' .4 rt 11 !! �1 r� t1�Jl1R �tJ ��- r �i rl �. 1— �I w ,,�,- Ir I S !!I c )t�', I��t• * lr� r�t tj `� YY�t!! �� ! tit i .,/ t4gYr -( c, JI .,�"`�t- �It 1 rr y � � 'x9" w-a ,�)d r t Y �a�tz 7St*T�p�ti3i. drit�q.» s7 ;al. " h�r.r �,I �b tt rr1'�y'ir. SIP Ir nlbluc 1 +�riy- � �. �Q��raiL.l"�� �� p�L � �10��r"t�lt � `►,",I �I , ��1`, t,, t�.I ,7r I , t I •��4 f t1Y / !/1 t � ��1� 'P �► 6,�tsF d `�T7�+5,ti,t..t -� r✓rtv�rnr..�l 1 � �E. �, 1 � ►� �,,,�� � I � .S1'��JZ.t.�.... _ .a �vim.�� S7F�i'S f .�� 15}r a�11 � � • I► �_�' 1l'�- _ � "�w3.A y � sc:..*ir��..ea �� I t � 4- 1 aSa rr 1t in Ir f aorl�Baal _! x� y rw•+� 4S. ; 1II! r�l tr I� y -. 101 y�o"J-0 � L. v Fx O� s.x� .1. Mz.7 a r�"�•�•�f�—"RM��r..�.w+� nW m llndrgr u d Sw Ac Alrt REVISIONS -� �� PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN BYO cdh rou nta POLICE PARKING LOT EXPANSION t _Opp d22 4,J HUNTINGTON BEACH CA m ,rye, tyttp OTY Or INNIINGTON B:A01 oar.mwn I ..w.o wo.. Y r I )Jl' +f T4r1�(��C, � t yI14r�r� f + !r i Y _41 _ I' �_•~ L� L I } 1ti AILL7 I `11 ��—'EFF��+�,,""" J i rf•M1 f f 71-1 4 *">t 1 r c F P r� 1 ' ,ualrctosAarss �f PA '�3y.J1 C1 ff �11I ��,+[�i' I �=�J SL.W��1 "��J I L �1 l� ♦ ,*7i ♦ rI IN/_ r r� it rly r I w I 1L 1 r rr ,/ . r r� 'M fr ^ I �7 t¢s `r' 4�f I ¢ a nJ �'t �y r +aYurW i, �74 I l �II/rJ7},�� i��' } �a� �tt}gyp ! ''� '�� � � } •�' it ♦,��� i ' y L � �-{�( 1 r I kr r� f„'I�,; ��'- } I � "4 A ►� §K Ix � , ��; { h '�, nA� —� T ► ' 1 l � . . Jr`I� � r,ifx��jjff ln,�� Y trdr Ica �h d Y PETrrJtihSl k yq sT; li `+ti � � b'h`1���+k'r�� 'w,�� �{11rf � 1 I ^✓ R� F,k�'? t'f� o,. i 4� r ,.✓ $�' '1 .i � rr 4. I ► ' rt s r,� '++J' its' r'! If ,, ''I r r 1,1 Z, T Y ��� ; ���y1 �� tal _ 1�1�1.�1 � � tA,��, L� � f a ` } MI- 11 yy y Q ,vCl`Wr_ � . 7 7W� _` tit �' _ Oil '17',fJLyq)(,! I r ` ` ' � [❑ 1 J el 'J �r�f I y i r y' y�''{ I'M P '+'IV {�J! ��ij�f{Y b�1^^Wyk"17't I 'Y �y�p�7�}y�1�T..wq" �� �Q Y � ' y" F(,l� IN 1 •r+.w�s a Y q w dv t.y rr C' IT w JL l k t�J��?'.+'�U a �,dfr'1'l I x 4 aT r r �! wr "rq�lkh. '`' T ,at „+ +`�f`4 •i1��1'`�}�' 141 M �d+t�SrRE�IT�` taV ,skl� J n t >u f'� _ h y�d '1' t Nil U sNrc���..y���"Y►�1�a� y,{����4�♦'�4y1Ty�,�Y " �.iP�- � u a AN l''7 �J�.aY1GY�rli.3� itiy.�4t3LL7.:� Vti Wt I .... Kf �Qi L UnCr a C Sw* Nwl REVISIONS ,�, Z,� „� PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN Cd TOLL FREE __ __ _ .— POLICE PARKING LOT EXPANSION T -E00 422 II ~~ " HUNTINGTON BEACH CA m grey ,� aTTNOF HUNTINGTON BEACH T sari —IT J fT1lATf Aldf 1 I I I a[9otxlut � I 1 � 1 1 1 ' I 1 � I I I 1 — 1 1 ' PARKM[o[ACCESS _ 1 RCSIULNNi �j 2 / I r y = PLANTING Irn.N. i1 I I I I I I 1 110 m[[s[ucnaN 1111 1 1111111 1 I ®1 I I 7^ N Sf1iCTON gnu![Ulc ON — — — — — .fir' _•� � _ _ _ — _ _� MAIN STREET _ _ _ — _ ® °, Smf`°" 1 I I u tdd su-A u.,l REVISIONS .v PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 'mY° TOLL F .�... ' �..�z7 „E »-r. ^... � POLICE PARKING LOT EXPANSION HUN IINCTON BEACH CA — — � �CITY Of IIUNIINCTON OEA01 I I ATTACHMENT 4 POLICE PARKING LOT EXPANSION HUNTINGTON BEACH CIVIC CENTER 2000 Main Street PROJECT NARRATIVE The City of Huntington Beach Police Department currently suffers from a shortage of secure parking for its personnel The Departments parking needs include space for both the City owned fleet as well as personal vehicles Personnel are currently forced to park in unsecured areas of the Civic Center and on curbed landscaped areas within the secured parking lot The existing secure parking is located on the southwest corner of the Civic Center adjacent to the Police Department and was last expanded in 1993 The parking lot is surrounded by a 10 high chain link fence with dark green fence fabric One monitored gate which is located off of Utica Avenue is currently used to access the lot This lot currently has parking for 108 secure spaces The Department also utilizes a non-secure area of the Civic Center just north of the Police Department which has 63 spaces This brings the total amount of existing parking to 171 spaces The City s Police Department fleet at the Civic Center consists of 215 vehicles This number does not include personal vehicles The goal of the expansion will be to build an adequate number of parking spaces for city-owned police vehicles and to create a "secure" area due to the costly computer and radio systems contained within the vehicles The new parking expansion will allow the police department to locate exclusively city-owned police vehicles in the lower parking lot located off of Utica Police employees will then be able to use the entire "upper" parking lot located just north of the police building In an effort to provide additional secure parking the Police Department is requesting approval to expand its existing secure parking lot to the south The expansion will provide approximately 90 additional spaces The vehicles that will occupy the parking spaces within the new expansion area will be those used primarily during normal business hours This will include detective and support staff cars in order to minimize the impact on the neighboring residences The patrol cars that are utilized 24-hours per day, seven days per week will be parked next to the police building to minimize any noise issues The proposed project will be bordered on the west by Main Street on the south by Utica Avenue and on the east by a residential screen wall and alley On May 18 2000 a Development Assistance Committee meeting was held to discuss this project The following pertinent items were discussed and agreed to by the Police Department 1 One tree per 10 stalls will be planted per code 2 Due to grading and the location of the existing trees relative to the required geometry of the parking the existing trees will be removed and replaced at a 2 1 ratio per code This is in addition to item 1 3 Approximately 30% of the area to be improved will be landscaped (8% minimum is required by code) 4 The expanded parking lot will be surrounded by a 10 high chain link fence with dark green fence fabric to match the existing lot 5 Landscaping will be provided in the area between the proposed fence and the existing sidewalk C\TEMPTIannmaNarrative I doc r I � 6 Lighting will provide a minimum of one-foot candle within the lot Shields will be utilized as needed to protect the residential neighborhood to the east 7 Drainage will be collected at the southwest corner of the site and drain to an existing catch basin at the intersection of Utica Avenue and Main Street The Huntington Beach Police Department looks forward to City approval and completion of this much-needed project C\TEMP\PlanningNarrative 1 doc ATTACHMENT 5 r C City J of Huntington Beach Planning Department J T , STAFF REPORT HUNTINOTON BEACH x f £ r TO Planning Commission FROM Howard Zelefsky, Director of Planning BY Amy Wolfe Associate Planner DATE August 22, 2000 SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Huntington Beach Police Department Parking Lot Expansion) APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER City of Huntington Beach LOCATION 2000 Maui Street (NEC of Main Street and Utica Avenue) STATEMENT OF ISSUE " Conditional Use Pen-rut No 00-39 request - Expand the existing 108 space secured Police Department parking lot area at the Civic Center complex by adding 90 secured Spaces - Site improvements include perimeter landscaping, perimeter fencing new double swung secunty gate and asphalt paving of an 0 7 acre landscape area at the northeast comer of Main Street and Utica Avenue Staffs Recommendation Approve Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with modifications based upon the following - General Plan goals and objectives for the continuation of public safety uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses and the provision of adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands - Project compatibility with adjacent residential land uses The proposed design, as conditioned will provide adequate separation and landscape screening between the proposed parking area and adjacent residences Noise will be mitigated by replacing the existing sliding gate with a double swung gate and by restricting parking on the easterly portion of the lot for detective vehicles - A decorative permanent perimeter screen wall will be constructed within 2 years from project approval to enhance the appearance of the project and views into the site - Project compliance with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) Development Standards The project is in compliance with building setback and perimeter landscaping standards a PROJECT ' SITE ! v a a nmur,rao ' R2 0 PD cLwb r r J 3 n aw�rvn iOLLY-SEACLIFF m SPECIFIC PLAN 0 -"D -�2 o-Po- AZ a CC) o r� �0� ) ru o-cn` t �s R2 CF-E-CD ?0°'0 R2-0-CD tR -CD-E-CD 0 ° ° o� I U a « m ,�s iF P N CC 0 C0-0 CIF-E l .� e►-o (DI cc T 0) CD-0 0 I ' o -CD 0 I tir C°-r CF—R .�`r RI RI RI RI RI R2 CO 0 VICINITY MAP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-39 DESIGN REVIEW 00-30 THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH C r Staff s Suggested Modifications Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 - Replacement of 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio in accordance with HBZSO requirements - Replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of trees to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east - Intensified use of shrub materials along the Main Street and Utica Avenue landscape perimeter area - Replacement of the perimeter chain link fence for the entire secured Police Department parking area with a decorative exterior block wall within two years of project approval The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center s architecture - Restrict parking on the easterly portion of the site to detective vehicles only to muumize parking by multiple vehicles and associated noise generated impacts RECOMMENDATION Motion to 'Approve Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with findings and suggested conditions of approval (Attachment No 1) ' ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S) The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as A "Deny Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with findings for denial B "Continue Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and direct staff accordingly ' PROJECT PROPOSAL Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 represents a request by the Public Works Department on behalf of the Police Department to expand the existing 108 space secured Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center by adding 90 secured spaces pursuant to Section 214 06, PS District Land Use Controls, Public Safety Facilities, of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO) The 90 secured parking space expansion will occupy the majority of the area at the northeast comer of Main Street and Utica Avenue and will require paving of approximately 0 7 acres of existing landscape area The parking lot expansion is an extension of the existing Police Department facility and is proposed to be screened by a 10 ft high perimeter chain link fence with dark green fence fabric to match the screening of the existing parking lot area to the north of the project site A ten ft wide landscape area will be provided between the proposed perimeter fence and the property line along Main Street A 15 ft wide landscaped area will be provided between the perimeter fence and the Utica Avenue property line The existing sliding gate is proposed to be replaced with a double swing gate No modifications to the existing 7 ft high masonry wall and 20 ft wide landscaped area along the easterly property line are proposed Staff Report—8/22/00 2 (00sr52) Parking lot lighting will provide a minimum 0 6 foot candle with a uniformity ration of 4 1 within the project site Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare The request is necessary (Attachment No 3) because additional secured parking is necessary for City owned Police Department fleet vehicles Background On March 3, 1992 the Planning Commission conditionally approved Conditional Use Permit No 92-8 and allowed the expansion of the Police Department parking lot by 27 spaces The expansion involved extending the existing parking lot 67 ft into the landscape area towards Utica Avenue The parking lot expansion was conditioned to serve as a temporary parking facility until a parking structure was constructed at the Civic Center ISSUES Subject Property And Surrounding Land Use,Zoning And General Plan Designations LOCATION GENERAL PLAN - ZONING LAND USE J. - Subject Property P (Public) PS (Public-Semipublic) Civic Center - open space North of Subject CO-F2 (Commercial CO (Office Commercial- Office Park Property Office—0 5 FAR) Oil Overlay) East of Subject RMH-25-d (Residential RMH-A (Medium High Single-family Property Medium High Density— Density Residential) Residential 25du/ac—design overlay) South of Subject RL-7 (Residential Low RL (Low Density Single-family Property Density—7du/ac) Residential) Residential West of Subject P (RL) - (Public w/ PS (Public-Semipublic) HB High School Property Residential Low Density underlying designation) General Plan Conformance The General Plan Land Use Map designation on the subject property is P (Public) The proposed project is consistent with tlus designation and the goals and objectives of the City s General Plan as follows Staff Report—8/22/00 3 (00sr52) A Land Use Element LU2 Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure utility infrastructure and public services LU 13 1 Provide for the continuation of existing and development of new uses such as governmental administrative, public safety, human service cultural educational, infrastructure, religious, and other uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses B Public Facilities and Public Services Element PF 1 I Provide adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands, and provide protection for the community from illicit activities and crone The proposed parking lot expansion will pernut the continued operation of the Police Department at the Civic Center and contribute towards maintaining levels of service while addressing community protection demands Zoning Compliance SECTION ISSUE CODE PROVISION PROPOSED 21408 Setbacks Front(Yorktown) 10 ft 260 ft Side (Main) 10 ft 10 ft Side (Park) loft 145 ft Rear(Utica) loft 15 ft 232 08 A General Planting 13 ac (8%) 4 6 ac (29%) Provisions 232 08 C Off-street Parking Facilities—Perimeter Landscaping Front (Yorktown) loft loft Side (Main) loft loft Side (Park) 10 ft 10 ft Rear(Utica) loft 15 ft This project is located in the PS (Public-Semipublic) zone and complies with the requirements of that zoning district The proposed parking lot expansion conforms to minimum parking lot development standards including parking stall design, circulation and perimeter landscaping Twenty nine percent (29%) of the entire Civic Center complex site will remain landscaped after project implementation Staff Report—8/22/00 4 (00sr52) A minimum 10 ft landscaped area will be provided along the Main Street frontage in compliance with parking lot design standards A 15 ft landscaped area is proposed along Utica Avenue wluch will exceed the muumum parking perimeter landscaping requirement by 5 ft Environmental Status The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states that minor alteration of public facilities involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing does not require further environmental review Coastal Status Not applicable Redevelopment Status The project is located in the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project, Yorktown-Lake subarea The Economic Development Department has reviewed the subject proposal and is in support of the proposed request Destan Review Board On August 10, 2000, the Design Review Board (DRB) approved the proposed design and landscaping plan for the Police Department parking lot expansion design subject to the following recommended conditions a The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project approval The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center's architecture b The submitted landscape plan shall be revised to reflect either replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of such trees,to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east Final tree selection shall be subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect c The submitted landscape plan shall be revised to reflect intensified use of shrub materials along the Main Street and Utica Avenue landscape perimeter area The Police Department is in agreement with the above DRB conditions Subdivision Committee Not applicable Staff Report—8/22/00 5 (OOsr52) Other Departments Concerns The Departments of Public Works and Building and Safety have recommended conditions which are incorporated into the conditions of approval The Fire Department and Economic Development Department have no concerns Public Notification Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Independent on August 10 2000 Notices were sent to property owners of record within a 300 ft radius of the subject property and individuals/organizations requesting notification (Planning Department's Notification Matrix) Staff has received verbal comments in opposition of the proposal by two adjacent property owners The two property owners have expressed concerns with anticipated noise and visual impacts associated with the loss of existing landscaping area and the proposed design of the perimeter fence Application Processing;Dates DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S) Conditional Use Penrut July 20 2000 October 20, 2000 ANALYSIS The proposed parking lot expansion will occupy approximately 0 7 acre of landscaped area at the northeast corner of the Main Street and Utica Avenue The area is not currently utilized for any specific function by any City Department but does provide landscaping and contributes to the aesthetic quality of the Civic Center The primary issues to consider in evaluating this project are a) land use compatibility with existing residential development to the east and b) aesthetics Discussion on each issue follows Land Use Compatibility Setbacks The proposed parking lot will be located approximately 110 ft from the existing single family homes to the east and 75 ft from the residential properties to the south The existing 20 ft wide landscape area between the existing accessway to the parking lot and the alley to the east is proposed to remain An additional 35 ft wide landscape area will be provided on the west side of the driveway to separate and partially screen the proposed parking area from the properties to the east A 15 ft wide landscape area will be provided along the south property line to screen the proposed facility from residences across Utica Avenue (please refer to Attachment No 2) The proposed landscaping and setbacks adequately separate and screen the parking lot from adjoining residential uses Staff Report—8/22/00 6 (00sr52) Lighting/Glare Lighting is proposed to be installed within the parking area for personnel and property safety The proposed illumination levels will provide a minimum 0 6 foot candle with a uniformity ration of 4 1 Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare A lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to operation to ensure no impacts will occur Noise It is anticipated that noise levels will increase as a result of the proposed 90 parking space expansion In an effort to minimize noise impacts to adjoining residential areas the proposal includes replacement of the existing sliding gate with a double swing gate The aforementioned measure will address, noise generated by the sliding gate as it slides on its track and noise from cars dnving over the track The proposed parking lot area will be utilized for patrol and detective vehicle parking Detective vehicles are used less frequently than patrol cars Therefore, in anticipation of noise impacts generated by cars leaving and opemng/closing of doors, staff recommends that detective vehicle parking is restricted to the easterly portion of the site This restriction will minimize parking space use by multiple vehicles during the day and associated noise impacts Aesthetics Landscaping/Screening The proposed parking lot expansion is currently landscaped with turf and contains six mature trees and three smaller trees within the central portion of the site In addition seventeen trees are located along the easterly landscape area adjacent to the alley Implementation of the proposed parking lot will require the removal of the existing trees in the central portion of the lot Staff recommends replacement of the 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio in accordance with HBZSO requirements The submitted conceptual landscaping plan provides minimal landscaping in the interior portion of the lot that is screened from public view and secured for safety purposes Intensified landscaping is proposed along the parking lot's perimeter in order to capitalize on aesthetic benefits and screening Staff recommends approval of the plan subject to either replacement of the proposed palms in the interior area between the accessway and the parking lot area with an alternative tree type or addition of an alternative tree type to the proposed palms in order to screen,to the greatest extent possible, the parking lot from the two story residences to the east Fencing A 10 ft high chain link fence with dark green fence fabric is proposed along the parking lot's perimeter to screen the vehicles from public view and provide security The proposed fence materials and colors are consistent with the adjoining parking lot area expansion approved in 1992 Staff Report—8/22/00 7 (00sr52) Staff supports the proposed fence design on a temporary basis This is based on the fact that the previous parking lot expansion was permitted as a temporary parking facility and there are no near term plans to construct a multi story structure to address the Police Department's parting needs However, staff recommends that the proposed fence be approved for only a two year period At that time the chain link fence for the entire secured parking lot (current parking lot expansion and 1992 approved parking) shall be replaced with a decorative screen wall, compatible in design, colors and materials with the Civic Center's architecture SUMMARY ♦ The proposed 90 space parking lot expansion, will maintain its current accessway to the Police Department secured parking area from Utica Avenue The existing 7 ft high concrete block fence and 20ft wide landscaped area along the easterly property line will not be modified ♦ The parking lot will be utilized for City owned vehicles only and parking on the easterly portion of the site will be restricted to detective vehicles in order to minimize noise impacts to adjacent residential areas ♦ The existing security gate will be replaced with a double swing gate to muumize gate related noise to adjacent residential arias Parking lot illumination will be designed to prevent spillage onto adjacent areas ♦ The proposed chain link fence will be replaced within two years from project approval with a decorative masonry wall compatible in colors and materials with the Civic Center s design ♦ The project will implement a) General Plan Land Use Element goals and objectives for the continuation of public safety uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses, b) General Plan Public Facilities and Public Services Element goals and objectives for the provision of adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands, c) will be in compliance with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Development Standards, and d)will be compatible with adjacent residential uses Staff recommends approval of the proposal with the following modifications - Provision of intensified perimeter landscaping to buffer the proposed parking areas from adjacent residential uses to the east and south - Replacement of 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio in accordance with HBZSO requirements - Replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of trees to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east - Intensified use of shrub materials along the Main Street and Utica Avenue landscape perimeter area Staff Report—8/22/00 8 (OOsr52) - Replacement of the perimeter chain link fence for the entire secured Police Department parking area with a decorative exterior block wall within two years of project approval The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center s architecture - Restrict parking on the easterly portion of the site to detective vehicles only to nlu=ze parking space use by multiple vehicles and associated noise generated impacts ATTACHMENTS 1 Findings and Suggested Conditions of Approval 2 Site Plan dated June 9, 2000 and Landscaping Plan dated August 4, 2000 3 Narrative 4 Letters in Opposition or Support SHHFAWk�I Staff Report—8/22/00 9 (OOsr52) ATTACHMENT NO 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERIN11T NO 00-39 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to section Class 1, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states that nunor alteration of public facilities involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing does not require further environmental review SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 1 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 request to expand the existing 108 parking space secured Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center complex site by adding 90 parking spaces will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood Based upon the proposed design and conditions imposed, adequate separation and landscape screening will be provided between the proposed vehicle parking area and adjacent residential uses A minimum 110 ft and 75 ft buffer area will be provided between the parking lot and the easterly and southerly residential uses respectively Trees will be planted within the parking lot to screen paved parking areas from adjacent single family dwellings The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project approval 2 The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because the most easterly portion of the parking lot expansion area will be designated for detective vehicle parking only in order to mmuze noise from frequent maneuvering into and out of parking spaces and from opening and closing vehicle doors In addition, the existing sliding gate shall be replaced with a double swing gate to reduce the noise generated by the sliding gate as it slides on its track and the noise from cars driving over the track 3 The proposed parking lot expansion will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance in addition to any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located A 10 ft wide perimeter landscaping area will be provided along the Main Street frontage in accordance with HBZSO requirements A 15 ft wide landscaped area along Utica Avenue will exceed perimeter landscape requirements by 5 ft Six (6) existing mature trees to be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 1 1 C 4 The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property In addition it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan Land Use Element L U 2 Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure, utility infrastructure and public services L U 13 1 Provide for the continuation of existing and development of new uses such as governmental administrative, public safety, human service, cultural, educational, infrastructure, religious, and other uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses Public Facilities and Public Services Element PF 1 1 Provide adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands, and provide protection for the community from illicit activities and crime The proposed parking lot expansion will permit the continuing operation of Police Department public safety services at the Civic Center site and contribute towards maintaining high quality levels of service and addressing community protection demands SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 1 The site plan, received and dated June 9, 2000 and landscape plan received and dated August 4, 2000 shall be the conceptually approved plans with the following modifications a The submitted landscape plan shall be revised to reflect replacement of the proposed palms in the mtenor landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative canopy tree species Final tree selection shall be subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect b The submitted landscape plan shall be revised to reflect use of turf in lieu of bark as a ground cover throughout the project site c Parking lot striping detail shall comply with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Title 24, California Administrative Code (Code Requirement) d Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view (Code Requirement) e Energy saving lamps shall be used for parking lot lighting All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 12 2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed a A grading plan prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval (P`V) b Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of grading permits and shall be referenced in the index c A Landscape and Imgation Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Arclutect which identifies the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials, an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a two to one ratio (2 1) with minimum 36 inch box trees and shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. (PW) (Code Requirement) d A hydrology and hydraulic analysis for the proposed on-site drainage improvements shall be prepared and submitted for approval (PW) e In accordance with NPDES requirements a"Water Quality Management Plan' shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer "Best Management Practices ' shall be identified and incorporated into the design (P`V) f The grading/erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control (PW) g The name and phone number of the contractor's field supervisor who will be on-site shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Public Works Department In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site at 250 ft intervals indicating whom to contact for information regarding this development and any construction/grading activity This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity He/she will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities,truck routes, construction hours, noise, etc Signs shall include the telephone number of the contractor's contact person the City's contact person (Jack Miller at 714-536-5517) regarding grading and construction activities, and "I-800-CUT-SMOG' if there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No 403 (P`V) (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 13 h All property owners and tenants within 300 ft of the perimeter of the project shall be notified of a tentative grading schedule at least 15 days prior to such grading (PW) 1 If the import or export of materials is required a truck haul route plan shall be developed and coordinated with the Public Works Department This plan shall include the approximate number of truck trips and the proposed haul route It shall specify the hours that transport activities can occur and the methods to mitigate construction related impacts to adjacent residents and public facilities These plans must be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval (PW) j Site plans and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls, walls, and fences consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department Double walls shall be prohibited Prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls The plans shall include section drawings, a site plan and elevations The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage 3 During grading and site development\the following shall be adhered to a Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available for use throughout the day during site grading to keep the soils damp enough to prevent dust from being raised by the operations (PW) b All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 8 00 a in and leave the site no later than 5 00p m , and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only (PW) c Areas to be graded or that are being graded shall be thoroughly wet down in the late morning and after work 1s completed for the day (PW) d The construction disturbance shall be kept as small as possible (PW) e All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface prior to leaving the site to prevent dirt and dust from impacting the surrounding areas (PW) f Prior to leaving the site, all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site onto a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets and other access ways (PW) g Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas (PW) h Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site to enclose the work area (PW) 1 Use low sulfur fuel ( 05%) by weight for construction equipment, j Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts), (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 14 ( ( k Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts 4 Prior to final inspection the following shall be completed a All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including 1) Landscaping, (PW) 2) Adequate space shall be provided between the swinging gates and the keypad operating the gate to pull-up with the gate closed (P� c The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department d Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department e All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them 5 Prior to the operation of the secured Police Department parking facility the following shall be completed a A parking management plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to parking lot operation The submitted plan shall designate the two most easterly rows of the parking lot expansion area for detective vehicle parking only b A lighting plan depicting proposed lighting fixture design and site placement shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to parking lot operation Parking lot lighting shall provide a minimum 0 6 foot candle with a uniformity ration of 4 1 within the project site Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare 6 The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project approval 7 The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein If the proposed changes are of a substantial (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 15 C nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS 1 Conditional Use Pernut No 00-39 shall not become effective until the ten calendar day appeal period has elapsed 2 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is August 22 2001 or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date 3 The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No 00-39, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs 4 The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code,Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein 5 Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7 00 AM to 8 00 PM Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays 6 All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 16 ATTACHMENT 6 DRAFT MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2000 Council Chambers- Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California STUDY SESSION - 5 15 PM (Room B-S) SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY (SRO) ORDINANCE—Rosemary Medel HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE—Rosemary Medel DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN— Wayne Carvalho AGENDA REVIEW—Herb Fauland PUBLIC COMMENTS—None REGULAR MEETING - 7 00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE P P P P P P P ROLL CALL Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic, Chapman, Biddle, Livengood, Speaker AGENDA APPROVAL Anyone wishing to speak must fill out and submit a form to speak No action can be taken by the Planning Commission on this date unless the item is agendized Any one wishing to speak on items not on tonight s agenda or on non-public hearing items may do so during ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Speakers on items scheduled for PUBLIC HEARING will be invited to speak during the public hearing (4 MINUTES PER PERSON,NO DONATING OF TIME TO OTHERS) A ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE B PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS DRAFT B-1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39r'(ErUNiTINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT PARKING LOT EXPANSION) APPLICANT City of Huntington Beach LOCATION 2000 Main Street (City Hall, northeast comer of Main Street and Utica Avenue) PROJECT PLANNER Amy Wolfe • Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 request - Expand the existing 108 space secured Police Department parking lot area at the Civic Center complex by adding 90 secured spaces - Site improvements include perimeter landscaping, perimeter fencing, new double swing security gate and asphalt paving of an 0 7 acre landscape area at the northeast comer of Main Street and Utica Avenue • Staffs Recommendation Approve Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with modifications based upon the following - General Plan goals and objectives for the continuation of public safety uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses and the provision of adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands - Project compatibility with adjacent residential land uses The proposed design, as conditioned will provide adequate separation and landscape screening between the proposed parking area and adjacent residences Noise will be mitigated by replacing the existing sliding gate with a:double swing gate and by restricting parking on the easterly portion of the lot for detective vehicles - A decorative permanent perimeter screen wall will be constructed within 2 years from project approval to enhance the appearance of the project and views into the site - Project compliance with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) Development Standards The project is in compliance with building setback and perimeter landscaping standards ♦ Staffs Suggested Modifications Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 - Replacement of 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio in accordance with HBZSO requirements - Replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of trees,to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east - Intensified use of shrub materials along the Main Street and Utica Avenue landscape perimeter area. - Replacement of the perimeter chain link fence for the entire secured Police Department parking area with a decorative exterior block wall within two years of project approval The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center's architecture - Restrict parking on the easterly portion of the site to detective vehicles only to mmim»e parking by multiple vehicles and associated noise generated impacts PC Minutes 8/22/00 2 a (OOPCM822) Commissioner Shomaker stated that she would be abstaining from taking action on this item as she lives within 300 feet of the proposed project Commissioner Mandic stated that she was advised by the City Attorney's office that she can speak on this proposed project Herb Fauland, Senior Planner, stated that they received a letter dated August 22, 2000, from Frank Yee opposing the proposed project THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Joyce Holmes, 1911 Park Street, presented copies of Attachment 4-1 (letter dated August 8, 2000) Ms Holmes spoke in opposition to the request Concerns expressed were increase in noise pollution, lighting at night, loss of green area, loss of mature trees, and loss of a recreation area THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED The Commission discussed parking of employee vehicles, source of funds,the necessity for 24- hour lighting,the need to mapose a maximum light level, landscaping, the Design Review Board's suggestions for intensified landscaping, a silent gate, and reduced lighting to prevent glare Captain Jon Arnold, City of Huntington Beach Police Department, representing the applicant, requested modifications to the conditions as follows Condition 1 a Change the wording to reflect the Design Review Board's (DRB) recommendation by deleting the words "canopy tree species"and replace with"alternative tree type or the addition of such trees, to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east" Condition 1 b Change to reflect the DRB's recommendation by stating that the landscape plan shall use ground cover throughout the project site to be reviewed and approval by the City Landscape Architect Intensified use of shrub materials shall be use along the Maya Street and Utica Avenue perimeter landscape area. Condition 5 a Delete the words"detective vehicle parking only" and replace with "investigation and support vehicle parking only" Condition 6 Add that "the design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center architecture" 9, RAFT---] PC Mmutes 8/22/00 3 (OOPCM822) 1 r QRA A MOTION WAS MADE BY KERINS, SECONDED BY MANDIC, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL,BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE AYES Kerins, Mandic, Chapman,Biddle,Livengood, Speaker NOES None ABSENT None ABSTAIN Shomaker MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEOA The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California.Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to section Class 1, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states that minor alteration of public facilities involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing does not require further environmental review FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 1 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 request to expand the existing 108 parking space secured Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center complex site by adding 90 parking spaces will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood Based upon the proposed design and conditions imposed, adequate separation and landscape screening will be provided between the proposed vehicle parking area and adjacent residential uses A minimum 110 ft and 75 ft buffer area will be provided between the parking Iot and the easterly and southerly residential uses respectively Trees will be planted within the parking lot to screen paved parking areas from adjacent single family dwellings The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area penmeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project approval 2 The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because the most easterly portion of the parking lot expansion area wall be designated for detective vehicle parking only in order to minimize noise from frequent maneuvering into and out of parking spaces and from opening and closing vehicle doors In addition,the existing sliding gate shall be replaced with a double swing gate to reduce the noise generated by the sliding gate as rt slides on its track and the noise from cars driving over the track- 3 The proposed parking lot expansion will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance in addition to any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located A 10 ft wide perimeter landscaping area will be provided along the Main Street frontage in accordance with HBZSO requirements A 15 ft wide landscaped area along Utica Avenue will exceed perimeter landscape requirements by 5 ft Six(6) existing mature trees to be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio PC Minutes 8/22/00 4 (OOPCM822) — F 1! e ^d CY 4 The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan Land Use Element LU2 Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure, utility infrastructure and public services. L U 13 1 Provide for the continuation of existing and development of new uses, such as governmental administrative,public safety,human service, cultural, educational, infrastructure, religious, and other uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses Public Faczlztzes and Public Servzces Element PF I 1 Provide adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands, and provide protection for the community from illicit activities and crime The proposed parking lot expansion will permit the continuing operation of Police Department public safety services at the Civic Center site and contnbute towards maintaining high quality levels of service and addressing community protection demands CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—CONDMONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 1 The site plan received and dated June 9, 2000 and landscape plan received and dated August 4,2000 shall be the conceptually approved plans with the following modifications a. The landscape plan shall be revised to reflect replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of such trees, to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east Final tree selection shall be subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect b The landscape plan shall use ground cover throughout the project site to be reviewed and approval by the City Landscape Architect Intensified use of shrub materials shall be use along the Main Street and Utica Avenue perimeter landscape area. c Parking lot stnping detail shall comply with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Title 24, California Administrative Code (Code Requirement) d Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public nghts-of-way Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view (Code Requirement) e Energy saving lamps shall be used for parking lot lighting All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations Cut offor dimmed lighting shall occur after 10 00 PM along the perimeter edge to mitigate any potential glare onto adjacent residential properties PC Minutes 8/22/00 5 iy (OOPCM822) r 2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed a. A grading plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval (PW) b Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of grading permits and shall be referenced in the index. c A Landscape and Imgation Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Pubhc Works and approved by the Departments of Pubhc Works and Planning The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials, an irrigation plan,a grading plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidehnes Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a two to one ratio (2 1) with minimum 36 mch box trees and shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan (PW ) (Cade Requirement) d A hydrology and hydraulic analysis for the proposed on-site drainage improvements shall be prepared and submitted for approval (PW) e In accordance with NPDES requirements, a'Water Quahty Management Plan" shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer "Best Management Practices" shall be identified and incorporated into the design- (PW) f The grading/erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control (PW) g The name and phone number of the contractor's field supervisor who will be on-site shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Pubhc Works Department In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site at 250 R intervals mdicating whom to contact for information regarding this development and any construction/grading activity This contact person shall be available ummediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity He/she will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herem, specifically, grading activities, truck routes,construction hours,noise, etc Signs shall mclude the telephone number of the contractor's contact person,the City's contact person (Jack Miller at 714-536-5517) regarding grading and construction activities, and"1-800- CIPT-SMOG"if there are concerns regarding fiigrtrve dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No 403 (PW) h. All property owners and tenants within 300 ft of the perimeter of the project shall be notified of a tentative grading schedule at least 15 days prior to such grading (PW) PC Minutes 8/22/00 6 (OOPCM822) i If the unport or export of materials is required, a truck haul route plan shall be developed and coordinated with the Public Works Department This plan shall include the approximate number of truck trips and the proposed haul route It shall specify the hours that transport activities can occur and the methods to mitigate construction related impacts to adjacent residents and public facilities These plans must be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval (PW) j Site plans and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls, walls, and fences consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department Double walls shall be prohibited Prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifymg the removal of any existing walls The plans shall include section drawings, a site plan and elevations The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage 3 During grading and site development\the following shall be adhered to a. Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available for use throughout the day during site grading to keep the soils damp enough to prevent dust from being raised by the operations (PW) b All haul trucks shall arrive at the srte no earlier than 8 00 am. and leave the site no later than 5 00p m., and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only (PW) c Areas to be graded or that are being graded shall be thoroughly wet down m the late morning and after work is completed for the day (PW) d The construction disturbance shall be kept as small as possible (PW) e All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface prior to leaving the site to prevent dirt and dust from impacting the surrounding areas (PW) f Prior to leaving the site, all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site onto a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets and other access ways (PW) g Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403,particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas (PW) h. Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the srte to enclose the work area. (PW) L Use low sulfur fuel( 05%) by weight for construction equipment, j Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days(first stage smog alerts), k Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts PC Mmutes 8/22/00 7 (OOPCM822) ---------------- 3 zz ik+y 4 Prior to final inspection the following shall be completed a. All nnprovements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including 1) Landscaping, (PW) 2) Adequate space shall be provided between the swinging gates and the keypad operating the gate to pull-up with the gate closed (PW) b The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct and submit a copy to Planning Department c Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department d All building spoils, such as unusable lumber,wire,pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them 5 Prior to the operation of the secured Police Department parking facility the following shall be completed a. A parking management plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to parking Iot operation. The submitted plan shall designate the two most easterly rows of the parking lot expansion area for investigation and support vehicle puking only b A lighting plan depicting proposed lighting fixture design and site placement shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to parking lot operation. Parking lot lighting shall provide a minimum 0 6 foot candle with a uniformity ration of 4 1 within the project site Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare 6 The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project completion The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center architecture 7 The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO PC Minutes 8/22/00 8 t (OOPCM822) 7.. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS 1 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 shall not become effective until the ten calendar day appeal period has elapsed 2 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is August 22, 2001 or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a mmmnum 30 days prior to the expiration date 3 The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No 00-39, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs 4 The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein.. 5 Construction shall be hunted to Monday- Saturday 7 00 AM to 8 00 PM Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays 6 All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Pl na_ning and Public Works for Code requirements Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission PC Minutes 8/22/00 9 (OOPCM822) ATTACHMENT 7 1937 Pine Street Huntington Beach., CA 92648 Tefeph.one 714-960-9665 r August 9, 2000 t Attention Howard Zelefsky Planning Director City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr Zelefsky DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NO 00-30/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 Huntington Beach Police Department Parking Lot Expansion—Main and Utica Please read our concerns into the record of your August 10, 2000 meeting as this time is not convenient to most working people We understand that the City proposes turning a park-like lot into a parking lot We are informed by the Planning Department that green screening on chain link fencing, similar to what is presently in place around the Police Department, will be installed around the proposed parking lot, even though there will be exterior landscaping The Police Department is not a temporary structure and the building of a permanent decorative wall around it is way overdue,particularly as the jail is housed there All the exterior screening, including existing temporary screening, should be permanently removed and replaced with a block stucco wall and landscaping to match the Civic Center complex Screening directly across the street from a high school and a skate board park is not acceptable The foot traffic in this area is heavy and open to vandalism The neighbors on Lake,Pine and Park streets already have had severe theft problems from their mailboxes located on the back alleys Most importantly,the City has no program in place to maintain this type of screening which gives the appearance of a blighted area There are various areas in the city which have vacant lots and are screened in this manner and other members of the public have already complained to City Council about the lack of maintenance A perfect example is the lot at Lake and Yorktown which has been in dispute for a number of years In the past this screening has been sprayed with graffiti and allowed to deteriorate, even thought it sits directly across from City Hall The only time it is replaced is when we contact the City and request replacement Graffiti was left on the screening for weeks even after it was reported to the City,though it is a well-known fact that it should be removed immediately to prevent further occurrences Even now,the old screening is thrown on the ground behind the recently replaced screening A more blatant example is the screening around the Beach and Yorktown Walgreens development which is directly en route to the Civic Center, every panel of which has been slashed within the first couple of weeks of installation We trust that this matter will be reconsidered Installing a parking lot is bad enough' To surround it with more screening is unacceptable If you are going to do ajob, do it nghtl Sincerely, OL John Thomas cc Mayor Dave Garofalo, Council Members Julien, Bauer,Dettloff, Green,Harman and Sullivan City Manager Ray Silver i August 8 2000 R E C E i v jE Attention Commissioner Ed Kerins AU 6 10 2000 Dear Commissioner Kerins and Members of the Design Review Board Department of Planning My husband and I recently received the attached notice regarding the expansion of the police department parking lot We are very distressed and are appealing to you to reconsider your recommendation to the planning commission We reside at 1911 Park Street We feel our property along with our neighbors, will be adversely impacted by this expansion We have been residents of this neighborhood for over twenty years We left our last home two blocks away due to the increase in traffic noise that came about when Yorktown was rerouted When we moved into our current home we considered it to be our final move and our dream home We have over the years, spent a great deal upgrading with the thought in mind that this would be our home for the rest of our lives One of the things that attracted this lot to us was the quiet neighborhood Having the green belt behind us we viewed as an excellent noise buffer and an attractive view When the city expanded the lot the first time, we attended the city council meeting We discovered that our pleas to find an alternative plan feel on deaf ears It is my hope that the current city officials will be more open to discussion and more willing to consider other alternatives that will not adversely affect private homes My concerns are these 1) the effect of the increase of noise and night lighting on the livability of our rear bedrooms 2} the loss of a beautiful green area containing several mature trees 3) the loss of a recreation area often used by local families and high school groups Our farruly supports the Huntington Beach Police Department and believes it is entitled to the best facilities possible We also believe this can be achieved without negatively affecting the residential property surrounding City Hall I have walked around the parking lot area numerous times and at various times of the day and night There always seems to be numerous empty parking stalls An alternative I would like to propose is to expand the police lot toward Yorktown rather than toward Utica I realize that secure fencing will need to be added Another suggestion is that less frequently used vehicles be housed in a city yard on another site such as located on Gothard I hope that whenever possible residential property be given priority and be protected from noise pollution I also hope that any and all green areas be saved when other alternatives exist Thank you all for your hard work and dedication I know yourjob is never easy I would appreciate your consideration in this matter I hope you will agree with me, that the existing green belt should stay as is and that this is the best thing for the entire neighborhood It is also my hope that you will explore other possible alternatives I would appreciate any feedback you could provide If there is any way that I can assist you please let me know Siely K a d—Joyce Holmes 1911 Park Street (714) 536 -4728 RECEIVE ® (- August 20 2000 AU G 2 2 2000 Department of Planning Dear Members of the Planning Commission, My wife and I write this letter regarding the second expansion of the police parking facility on Main Street We are not in faN or of this second expansion and hope tlus Commission votes against the expansion We reside at 1907 Park Street In the ten years we have lived at this address this proposed project will be the second setback for us as residents on Park Street This proposed project will affect all of us physically emotionally aesthetically and financially It is not fair appropriate or considerate for us to be taken advantage of twice since these homes were built in such a short period of time It should be noted we have made verbal and written complaints about the light and noise problems originating from the traffic to and from the police parking area With the expansion of the parking facilities these problems can only get worse and it would be unfortunate that the Commission would take steps to only enhance these problems rather than mimmi e them In an effort to be part of the solution rather than only complainers my wife and I offer some thoughts for alternatives 1 more parking added along Lake Street 2 additional parking should be considered at the City parking facility on Gotherd. 3 utilize more parking on Yorktown by the City garage and Huntington Beach High School 4 Reconfigure existing parking where secondary vehicles can be parked elsewhere We propose and would support reallocation of the funds for this project to a project of greater need(r e police enforcement) The home owners on Park Street should not be taken advantaged of again by City government We support our Police Department and their needs when called upon to do so Fiscally sound projects and proposals have been supported by us and our neighbors We have all talked favorably about our Police Department to friends both in the City as well as other cities I know that should this project to expand the police parking lot be approved,we all would be very disappointed and feel that our City government and police have let us down We all need to be good neighbors-both the City government to the residents as well as the residents to City government. Ism t it time that the government listened to us I Dear members let us keep City Hall visually appealing. The green-black fencing at the comer of Yorktown and Lake Streets is awful Why not improve that comer and place a parking area there with beautiful landscaping to disguise the parking. Form and beauty needs a greater standing in our City Especially near City Hall,we need to preserve the sense of a"landscaped-monument' Please consider this thoughtfully The green,landscaped area of grass and majestic mature trees is the last"monument' of nature that the City Hall area has left. In conclusion,please do not move forward on this parking lot expansion Once paved,it will never ever go back to the"green momiment"we have now Vote NO and consider another alternative The City of Huntington Beach as well as the residents of Park Street do not deserve a double hit by a second expansion of the same area that was miscalculated and misjudged a few years ago C Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter and the chance to voice my opinion I trust all of you will vote courageously thoughtfully and with"HEART" not Just your head- Thou ghtfully yours Frank Yee 1907 Park Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO GET INVOLVEDI Please drop off or mail the attached letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members �Zw0 M,��4 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name Address C a = 0 -J S D RE - cup 00 39 THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO GET INVOLVED' Please drop off or mail the attached letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name Address Hof S"C H 3 92�%`� THANK'YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO GET INVOLVED? Please drop off or mail the attached letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members ZWO & Jib- " Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Nam 4 Address !:SL �j w - rr7 r - T �. C7 (�� C1A P 00 — -�9 1 A t August 28, 2000 Dear Council Member Shirley Dettlof, We are Huntington Beach residents concerned about a recent decision made by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission Early in August, we were notified that the Huntington Beach Police Department had applied for a permit to expand their current parking lot In our attached letters you will see a list of concerns regarding the negative impact this project would have on our property and the surrounding neighborhood As outlined in our letters, we have attempted to be proactive by offering altemati-ves to the proposed plan n s this matter was decided rather quickly, we feel we were not given adequate time to be a part of the decision making process We would like the opportunity to meet and explore more positive solutions to the proposed permanent alteration of our neighborhood Due to the excessive appeal fee, we are requesting that you, our Council Representatives, appeal on our behalf, so that mutually beneficial options could be further explored Examples of possible savings include a) Reassignment of the existing parking lot using 45 existing parking slots on Lake SVMann St for city vehicles This will increase police spaces on Main St b) Reduce the size of the new proposed parking from 90 to 45 parking slots reducing all costs c) Postponement of this project for actual ynstallation costs, contingencies, and over-ndes Please give us an opportunity to be heard Thank you for your continued commitment and service to the residents of Huntington Beach Sincerely yours, Keith, Joyce & Caitlin Holmes MaryAnn Kielb Frank & Darleen Yee Jeff Owens THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO GET INVOLVED► Please drop off or mail the attached letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, s� Name �A N D 1 mop N GT ors WA Address 1 E5 ZZ— kA /n/ � H-j-j 92� � 27ZS City of Huntington Beach Mayor and City Council I It is my understanding that the city of Huntington Beach intends to expand the existing police parkmg lot by an additional ninety spaces The proposed location for the expansion is situated on the northeast comer of Main Street and Utica Avenue Currently, the property is attractively landscaped with a large grassy area and several trees In 1998,I purchased the residence at 1905 Park Street,where I currently reside The rear deck of my residence faces west, toward the proposed location of the parking lot expansion project The view of the trees and green belt area was a consideration in my purchase of this residence Replacing this attractively landscaped area with a parking lot will negatively impact the view from my deck and the property value of my residence I am also very concerned with the noise associated with a police parking lot,which will be utilized twenty-four hours a day I understand that this property is owned by the city and may be used for purposes deemed appropriate by city officials I am asking, however, that the mayor and city council members postpone the project long enough to consider other options,which may include -Reducing the size of the proposed expansion by 50% and maintaining the present landscaping throughout the remainder of the property -Relocating the project to another area If these options are not viable, I implore members of the city council to carefully consider constructing the proposed parking facility in such a way that it impacts local residents as little as possible The facility should be designed to guard the surrounding homes from the exposure of excessive noise and should be as aesthetically pleasing as a parking lot can be Thank for your consideration, r Je wens (714) 960-8518 1905 Park Street Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO GET INVOLVED r, Please drop off or mail the attached letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members 2LCCI ) Mvslcrit Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name Address Rv--' -\.A P No 00 -- 39 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name Address PrI Jrk es� ti r� L -:7 1 Z Gv&P No oa — 39 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name Address IL)L,� {vq— /N c (4 r t i� Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name Address G L rr. M1 J� M1 '1 } w � w Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name14 L a &I Address r 'l Yr CUP 00 —31 s� CY 6tILL- /fL17 ze, �{ 1 o Gltic o, Uk-T 1b 00 15 10 HB UHHMEER OFxCOMM 714 360-7b54 F 1 I October 16,2000 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner o£Main Street and Utica Ave I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current"Green Space Park" I I support the building of a permanent parking structure at the Civic Center This was pronused in 1992 More parlung spaces are needed now as well as in the fixture for employees and visitors to the Civic Center Sincerely, Ann Minnie 1747 Park St Huntington Beach, Ca 92649 714-536-6809 0 LL- C- r D I I 2�cLo�r� I f RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT Planning SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Continued from the November 6 2000 meeting) COUNCIL MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the Clty Attorney) Not Applicable Subleases Third Party Agreements etc (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget over $5 000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Attached Commission' Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS REVIEWED RETURNED FOR ED Administrative Staff ( ) ( ) Assistant City Administrator (Initial) ( ) ( ) City Administrator (Initial) City Clerk EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM Only)(Below' Space For City Clerk's Use RCA Author HZ SH AW rl PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a NOTICE OF resident of the County aforesaid I am PUBLIC HEARING spaces of oca parking / BEFORE—THE CITY spaces Location 2000 over the age of eighteen years and not a COUNCIL OF THE Main Street co (Cirner Hall northeast corner of Main / CITY OF Street and Utica Ave I nue) party to or interested In the below HUNTINGTON BEACH Amy Amy Assigned Planner Wolfe entitled matter I am a rind al clerk�of NOTICE IS HEREBY NOTICE IS HEREBY( p p GIVEN that on Tuesday GIVEN that Item No 1 is the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a September 4 2001 at categorically exempt 700 pm in the City from the provisions of, newspa er of general circulation, printed Council Chambers the California p 2000 Main Street Hunt Acf ironmental Quality and published in the City of Huntington Colon Beach to pCrty` Council will hold a ublic ON FILE A copy of the hearing on the following proposed request is on Beach County of Orange State of planning and zoning file in the City Clerks Of , � items I fice 2000 Main Street 1 APPEAL BY FOR Huntington Beach Cali California, and that attached Notice is a MER COUNCIL MEM forma 92648 for inspec true and complete copy as was printed BEM AND MAYOR PRO lion by the public A copy TEM TOM HARMAN OF I of the staff report will be a THE PLANNING )available to interested and published in the Huntington Beach � MISSIONS APPROVAL Parties at the City and Fountain Valley issues of said OF CONDITIONAL USE Clerks Office after Au I PERMIT NO 00 39 gust 31 2001 (POLICE DEPART ALL INTERESTED) to wit the issue(s) of MENT PARKING LOT PERSONS are invited to newspaper EXPANSION) (CON attend said hearing ands TINUED FROM THE express opinions or( NOVEMBER 6 2000 submit evidence for orl MEETING) Appellant against the application) Tom Harman former as outlined above If you Council Member and challenge the City Coun r Mayor Pro Tern cds action in court you1 Applicant City of Hunt may be limited to raising AUgUSt 23 , 2001 mgton Beach Request only those issues you or l Appeal of the Planning someone else raised at Commission s decision the public hearing de to approve the ex scribed in this pansion of the existing notice or in written cor 108 space secured Pol I respondence delivered ice Department Parking to the City at—or prior to declare, under penalty of perjury, that lot by adding 90 secured the public hearing If parking spaces for a to there are any further the foregoing is true and correct questions please call the I i Planning Department at 536 5271 and refer to the above items Direct your written communica I tions to the City Clerk Executed on August 23 2001 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of at Costa Mesa, California Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street 2nd Floor Huntington Beach California 92648 (714) 536 5227 Published Huntington) Beach Independent August 23 2001 j 084 17 Signature N DIU Big I MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 DEPARTMENT SUBJECT REQUESTING Planning Appeal by Former Council Member and mayor Pro Tem Tom Harman of the Planning Commission's Approval of Police Parking Lot Expansion - continued from 11/6/2000 TODAY'S DATE August 10, 2001 VERIFIED BY ADMININSTRATION APPROVED BY Ray Silver City Administrator 8/10/01 3 50 PM NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday September 4 2001 at 7 00 p m in the City Council Chambers 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning item ❑ 1 APPEAL BY FORMER COUNCIL MEMBER AND MAYOR PRO TEM TOM HARMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (POLICE DEPARTMENT PARKING LOT EXPANSION) (CONTINUED FROM THE NOVEMBER 6, 2000 MEETING) Appellant Tom Harman former Council Member and Mayor Pro Tern Applicant City of Huntington Beach Request Appeal of the Planning Commissions decision to approve the expansion of the existing 108-space secured Police Department parking lot by adding 90 secured parking spaces for a total of 198 parking spaces Location 2000 Main Street (City Hall northeast corner of Main is Street and Utica Avenue) Assigned Planner Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ON FILE A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk s Office 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach California 92648 for inspection by the public A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk s Office after August 31 2001 ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above If you challenge the City Council s action in court you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street 2nd Floor Huntington Beach California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (g legals CCLGFRM2) t t CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST �, ` SUBJECT � oak;3P Oo-39 (� PP �F 1, ' �ow�o DEP TNiENT MEETING DATE 914 1 O -�e O CO ACT M U.) PHONE 5 7 S /A YES NO ( ) ( ) Is the notice attached? Do the Heading and CIosmg of Notice reflect City Council(and/or J� RedeveIopment Agency)hearing? ( ) ) ( ) Are the date,Iday and time of the public beanng correct? i ( ) ( ) If an appeal,is the appellanes name mcluded is the notice? i I ( ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,does the notice include appeal language? ( ) ( ) ( Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Councils i ( ) ( ) ( Is a map attached for publication? Is a larger ad required? Size ( ) ( ) Is the verification.statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? ! _ ( ( ') ( ) Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? Are the appellanes name and address part of the mailing labels? x If Coastal Development Permit,is the Coastal Commission part of the mill-Itag I' labels? I If Coastal Development Peraut,are the resident labels attached? ( ) ( ) is the Report 33433 attached? (Economic Development Dept.items only) Pleas complete the following- - 1 mimum days from publication to hearing date 10 I 2 Number of times to be published r 3 Number of days between publications N I 21 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Inter Office Communication 3 Planning Department TO Connie Brockway, City Clerk FROM Amy Wolfe, Associate Planner DATE August 1, 2001 SUBJECT Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 (Police Department Parking Lot Expansion) Please be advised that the Planning Department (Andrea Lowman) has verified and updated the 300 ft radius mailing labels for the Police Department Parking Lot Expansion(CUP NO 00 39) utilizing the 2001 County Assessment rolls data The mailing list has been expanded to also include tenants within 300 ft of the site and other interested parties yFWlfe Associat lanner H\WOLFEA\CUP 00 39\memo doe C Oa 3� lr�L-AC.Cc 1?A ex..t 1J� L-07 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST B Vc ?A i3 S kO tJ MAILING LABELS-September 21, 2000 C CC- A P f E f\ t,� President 1 Huntington Harbor P 10 FANS 16 H B Chamber of Commerce P O�Box791 John Miles 2100 Main Street, Suite 200 Suns 90742 19425 Castl od Circle Huntington Beach CA 92648 Hunt a on Beach, CA 92648 Judy Legan 2 William D Holman 11 Sue Johnson 16 Orange County Assoc of Realtors PLC 19671 Quiet �y ane 25552 La Paz Road 19 Corporate Plaza Drive Hu a on Beach, CA 926z8 Laguna Hills CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660 7912 President 3 Mr Tom Zanic 12 Edna Littlebury 17 Amigos De Bolsa C New Urban West Gldn St Mob Hm Owners Leag 16531 Bolsa a Street,Suite 312 520 Broadway Ste 100 11021 Magnolia Blvd Hunti n Beach, CA 92646 Santa Monica CA 90401 Garden Grove, CA 92642 Sunset Beach Community As Pres H B Hist Society 13 Pacific Coast Archaeological 18 Pat Thies,Pre:CA ident C/O Newland House Museum Society,Inc PO Box 215 19820 Beach Blvd P O Box 10926 Sunset Be , 90742 0215 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Attn Jane Gothold President 5 Community Services Dept 14 County of Orange/EMA 19 Huntington Beach Tomorrow Chair-person Michael M Ruane Dir PO Box 865 Historical Resources Bd P O Box 4048 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Santa Ana CA 92702-4048 Julie Vandermost 6 Council on Aging 15 County of Orange/EMA 19 BIA OC 1706 Orange Ave Thomas Mathews 9 Executive a#100 Huntington c ,CA 92648 P O Box 4048 Iry 92714-6734 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Richard Spicer 7 Jeff Metzel 16 Planning Department 19 SCAG Seacliff HOA Orange County EMA 818 Wes , 12th Floor 19391 Sha arbor Circle P O Box 4048 Los geles CA 90017 H gton Beach, CA 92648 Santa Ana, CA 927024-48 E T I Corral 100 8 John Roe 16 County of Orange/EMA 19 Mary Bell Seacliff HOA Tim Miller 20 _ astwood Cu 19382 Surf" P O Box 4048 untington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Santa Ana CA 92702-4048 Frank Caponi 9 Lou Mannone 16 Planning Dir 20 Environmental Board Chairman Seacliff HOA City of Costa Mesa 6662 Glen Drive 1982 Bluff Circle P O Box 1200 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Costa Mesa, CA 92628 1200 G\RAMONA\LABELS\PHLBL 092100 DOC 7- Cupoo-37 937 16-530 937 16-531 937 16-532 JOSEPH &REBECA MENESES MICHAEL GALANOS GEORGE A.&JANICE 0 WOODLEY 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#707 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#708 17051 MARINA BAY DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92W 2817 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2817 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649-2917 937 16-533 937-16-534 937 1&535 SCOTT D STERNBERG EDWARD J KNIGHT MELODY JANE GUIVER 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#802 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#803 8802 LUSS DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2849 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2849 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-2230 937 16-537 937-16-538 937 16-539 OLD TOWN INC KENNETH ATHERTON MARY K HAYNES 12132 TOPAZ CIR 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#807 263 CHESTERFIELD GARDEN GROVE CA 92845-1831 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2849 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92560.4223 937 16-540 937-16-541 937 16-542 ILENE S GREEN GREEN TRUST 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#901 6012 POINT LOMA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2860 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647-6116 543 937-16-544 ( 93716-545 i V WILLLAM J &VANESSA E CORRE(A i GAYLE E GLENN 4191 PIERSON DR 13829 CHERRY AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 3050 CHINO CA 91710-7405 1 93716-546 93716-547 93716-548 I ANTHONY RAPTIS KEVIN D BOROFF VALENCIA L.DENNIS 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#907 40 VIA DI NOLA 2323 HUNTINGTON ST 01001 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2860 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 9008 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 937 16-549 937-16-550 937 1&551 JOHN PIEKARSKI NORIKO YOSHIOKA DEBORAH K.MOUSSAFIR 7585 OCEAN POINT LN 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#1003 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#1004 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264MO67 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 937 16.552 937-16-553 937 16-554 (iR) REYNOLDS KAREN LYNN STEES BEN R.&JUDY WOLF 1646 KINGLET CT 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#1006 4214 PASEO DE PLATA COSTA MESA CA 92626-4840 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 CYPRESS CA 90630-3428 937 16-555 1 S q 3 ROSTI VA 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#1008 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 1 � G� 00-3�' 937 16-499 937 16-501 937 16-502 RICHARD J WINKLE ANTHONY JAMES KUBIS DOUGLAS P WHITNEY 115 IRVINE COVE COURT 9332 VELARDO DR 215 WICHITA AVE LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651-1040 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-2315 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-280C 937-16-503 937-16-504 937-16-505 UNDA R.OGAN TURNER CLEO R TR OF H CARL EDMUND BALL 215 WICHITA AVE#405 215 WICHITA AVE:406 3615 WALNUT AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 LONG BEACH CA 90807-4309 937-16-506 937 16.507 937-16-508 ALEXANDER KHURGEL GARY &DALLAS DAY JEANNIE DIMALANTA 215 WICHITA AVE#408 215 WICHITA AVE 9409 215 WICHITA AVE=501 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-287( 937 16-509 937 16-510 937 16-511 SANGEETA RANI GUPTA ROSA MAHIN ROBERTA.DUNN 215 WICHITA AVE#502 215 WICHITA AVE a503 215 WICHITA AVE 1i504 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-287 937-16-512 937-16 513 937-16-514 ERNEST M &NANCY A-GOLDBERG GEORGE A.&JANICE 0 WOODLEY WAN C HO 20171 BIG BEND LN 17051 MARINA BAY DR 18863 JEFFREY AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4813 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649-2917 CERRITOS CA 90703-6177 937 16-515 937 16 516 937-16-517 CHART ASSAWAPIMONPORN JENNIFER A.LEICHT CHRISTOPHER CATTLE 215 WICHITA AVE#508 215 WICHITA AVE 9601 PO BOX 61 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-006 937 16-518 937 16-519 I 937-16-520 FRANK M &GLORIA M J FIORILLO JAMES SIMMONS I CLIFFORD W GILLESPIE 1T741 FALKIRK LN 215 WICHITA AVE#604 215 WICHITA AVE 9605 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649-4812 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-287 937-16-521 937-16 522 937-16-523 NANETTE MARI<HAM NESTOR VARGAS JEFFREY ALAN PAGE 215 WICHITA AVE#606 215 WICHITA AVE#607 215 WICHITA AVE#S08 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-287 937-1&524 937-16 525 937 1&526 DOLORES M DWYER CHESTER E.&NANCY H MURCH DEBRA SUSAN RICE 20601 SUBURBIA LN 159 ORANGE PARK 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#703 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-5451 REDLANDS CA 92374-5543 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-281 937 16-527 937 16 528 937-16-529 ANNA YAMAUCHI JOAN ELLIOTT JOSHUAA.CARR 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#704 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#705 15211 NEWCASTLE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2817 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2817 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 263 COP oa -37 93715-439 937-15.440 937 15-441 WILLM T TIEHEN JOHN &LAUREN OTT RAYMOND J &SHARON S PARRISH 7412SEABLUFF DR#107 7412 SEABLUFF DR 4-108 7412 SEABLUFF DR#109 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648- 432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264&6432 93715442 937-15-443 937 15-444 CHAMES B SMITH RALPH J &ANN K.KAJDASZ MARGOT M HUME 7412SEABLUFF DR#110 7412 SEABLUFF DR#111 7412 SEABLUFF DR#112 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-5432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649-6432 93716475 937 1 S476 937 16-477 N1101111L&ASHIMA MEHTA LAURA R YARNS JOEL WOOLDRIDGE 215 yVCHITA AVE 10L 215 WICHITA AVE#102 215 WICHITA AVE#103 HUNTNGTON BEACH CA 92648-2800 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 93716478 937-16.479 937-16-480 IRYMEL KANODE DIANA KUKA JOHN F &SUE ANN MILLER 17382ALTA VISTA CIR 215 WICHiTA AVE-J 05 1030 13TH ST HUNTNGTON BEACH CA 92647-6130 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2712 937-16481 937-16-482 93716483 KEVIN PHAM SANDRA H NOBLE RICHARD NELSON 215 VVMITA AVE#107 215 WICHITA AVE 0108 215 WICHITA AVE#201 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 i 9379484 i 937 18-485 I 937 16-486 i f SUSMPi MCCLARIN FRED E.MARQUEZ KATHLEEN HARRIS 215 WCHITA AVE#202 215 WICHITA AVE#203 4362 FLOWERDALE CT HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 LAS VEGAS NV 89103.4222 937 i6487 - _ - I 93716488 937-16-489 I FRANKJ VITONIS DAWN ARNOLD CRAIG B CARSTENS 215 WQilTA AVE#205 PO BOX 24042 215WICHITAAVE#207 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 INDIANAPOLIS IN 46224-0042 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-2878 93716490 , 937-16-491 93716-492 BETTYS HAYASHI HANS J &CHRISTA BOEDEKER CYNTHIAALYCE&RICHARO G AINSUE 215MMITAAVE#208 1G491 COWAN HEIGHTS DR 3000 COUNTRY CLUB DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 SANTA ANA CA 92705-1556 GLENDALE CA 91208-1712 93716493 937-16494 937 16-495 CHARLES E.ELLIS LINDA MASTERTON ROBIN J CLARK 4939 BiOWNDEER LN 215 WICHITA AVE#304 215 WICHITA AVE#305 RANCID PALOS VERDES CA 90275-3917 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 93716496 937 16497 937 16-498 KEITHR HOPKINS JOHN M GRAEFF HOWARD JAY&MIRI C FRANTZ 215 Wr IITA AVE#306 215 WICHITA AVE#307 31 WHITEWOOD WAY HUNTNGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 IRVINE CA 92612 2722 1 023-041-03 023-041-04 023-041-06 CITY O�FINGTON BEACHCMC IMPRO CITY OF HUNTING BEACH C NIC IMPRO CITY OF HUNTI ON BEACH 2000 2000 MAI 2000 H TINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2702 HUW19GTON BEACH CA 92648-2702 HU NGTON BEACH CA 92648-2702 023.041-07 937-15-413 937-15-414 HAROLD E.SHINN THOMAS L&LINDA M SMITH SCOTT &SUSAN L MARAN Z 7371 SEABLUFF DR#101 7371 SEABLUFF DR#102 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-643, 937 15-415 937-15-416 937-15-417 ROBERT J &JUDITH A.GUIDOTTI FREYMANN RONALD&JANET I VON MOSHI &MASAKO TERASHIMA 7371 SEABLUFF DR 0103 7540 58TH AVE NE 7371 SEABLUFF DR#105 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 OLYMPIA WA 98516-9305 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264&U3 937 15418 937-15 419 937-15-420 JAMES R.&ANTOINETTE A.REED JOE E.ROBERTSON AARON COWEN 7371 SEABLUFF DR#106 7371 SEABLUFF DR#107 7371 SEABLUFF DR#108 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92W i f i 937 15-421 937-15422 937-15-423 i DONALD M &ANITA S L 21MMERMAN KATHERINE O KLEIN HOWARD M WARNER 7371 SEABLUFF OR#109 7371 SEABLUFF DR'110 7371 SEABLUFF DR#111 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-0431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-643 937 15-424 937-15-425 937-15-426 STEVEN H &JOAN W PURDUE GLENDA M LEE HARBIN PAULINE M TRUST 7371 SEABLUFF DR#112 19501 RANCH LN#101 19501 RANCH LN#102 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6435 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-643, 937 1 S 427 937-15.428 937-15-429 GLADYS L GRISWOLD WILLIAM A&AILEEN E REID CHESTER G DONALDSON 19501 RANCH LN#103 19501 RANCH LN#104 19501 RANCH LN#105 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6435 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6435 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-643_ 937 15-430 937-15-431 937-15-432 NANCY L TREISTER YASH P &SHASHI SUBBERWAL JAN WALLACE&MARGARET MICHA 19501 RANCH LN#106 19501 RANCH W#107 Wet RANCH LN#108 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-0435 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6435 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-643_ 937 15-433 937-15-434 937-15-435 RICAHRD J &MAUREEN K.MC DONALD STEPHEN K.PERZIGAN 7412 SEABLUFF DR#101 7412 SEABLUFF DR#102 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 926-48- 432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 93715-436 937-15-437 + 937-15-438 JOSEPH &CAROL E-TARTAGLINI PEGGY KOHL GILBERT CARRASCO 7412 SEABLUFF DR#104 7412 SEABLUFF DR#105 7412 SEABLUFF DR#106 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-643 President Judy Legan HB Chamber of Commerce Orange County Assoc of Realtors 2100 Maui St Suite 200 25552 La Paz Rd Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Laguna Hills Ca 92653 William D Holman Mr Tom Zanic Edna Littlebury PLC _ New Urban West Gldn St Mob Hm Owners League 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 2D0 520 Broadway Suite 100 11021 Magnolia Blvd Newport Beach Ca 92660 7912 Santa Monica,Ca 90401 Garden Grove Ca 92642 President,HB Hist Society President HB Tomorrow Richard Spicer—SCAG C/o Newland House Museum PO Box 86.) 818 West 7'' 12'Floor 19820 beach Blvd Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Los Angeles Ca 90017 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Community Services Dept John Scandura City of Huntington Beach Chairperson Environmental Board Chairman Dept of Public Works histoncal Resources Board 17492 Valeworth Circle 2000 Main St Huntington Beach Ca 9264 9 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 023 061 42 023-062 01 023 062-02 J ine Rothrock Dennis Niccole Walter Van Deusen 1842 Park St 400 Yd St 1841 Park St Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 u23 06203 023 06204 023-062-12 Will Fowler Robert Tarzian Sr Bobby Rank 6622 Bar Harbor Ln 1833 Park St 1832 Main St Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 023 06229 023-062 31,33 023-062-32 David Frampton John Peterson Larry Taylor 1834 Main St 1808 17"'St 1846 Main St Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 937-154-26 937-154-35 937-164-75 Celeste Post Joan VanAlst Nilchil Meta 3421 Wexford#101 7412 Seabluff#103 13528 La Sierra Las Vegas Nv 89129 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Chino Hills Ca 91709 023-031-35 023-061-19 023-061-22 Arthur & Darlene Hornbeck George & Susan Abbond Roger Hosmer 1925 Park St 1848 Park St 1836 Park St Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntj-n t n Beach, Ca 92648 Hunt.uigton Beach, Ca 92648 023-061-32 California Coastal Camussaon Sandra Peterson Robert Waschkeit Theresa Henry 1808 17th St 315 W Utica 200 Oceangate, loth Floor Huntaxaton Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Long Beach, Ca 92802-4302 ;ingtronVch, ggs John Thomas Margaret Riggs 1937 P=e St 1824 Park 92648 Huntungton Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Cup oa-39 1 - Q.)7 16a 83 937-165 00 9-17-165-22 Charles Williams Jeffrey blesener David Tsong 23690 Homes Ave 21152 Shaw Ln 20381 Crauner Ln Nuevo Ca 92.)67 Huntmgton Beach Ca 9264 6 Huntmgton Beach Ca 9264 8 937 165 25 937-165 36 937-165-39 Chester Murch — Timothy Bndger Mary Haynes 1630 Marion Rd 2323 Huntington St�80:) 2405 Vista Nubleza Redlands Ca 92374 Huntmgton Beach Ca 9264 8 Newport Beach Ca 92660 9.)7 165 41 023 044 06 023-043 31 Robert Warne Gary Eichman Michael Elsesser 1630 Marion Rd 1927 Pine St 1948 Pine St Redlands Ca 92374 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntmgton Beach Ca 9264 8 i 023 043 30 023-041 07 023-062 05 Joan Gianatasio Pacific Coast Homes Carolyn Lacy 1946 Pine St PO Box 285 3013 S Thornton St Huntmgton Beach, Ca 92648 Houston,Tx 7701 Santa Ana,Ca 92704 023 020 03 05 09 023 044 0' 023 044-04 HB Union High School District Tho t Thomas& Suzanne Valker 1025 Yorktown Ave 1937 P e 1935 Pine St Huntington Beach, Ca 9264 8 Huntin on Beach Ca 9264 8 2762 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 276 023 044-06 023 044 07 023-044-09 Gary Etchman Carl&Eleanor Holmes Pam Julien 1927 Pine St 1925 Pme St 1917 Pine St Huntmgton Beach, Ca 92648 Huntmgton Beach Ca 92648 Huntmgton Beach Ca 92648 023 044 10 025 023-17 025 023-21 Joan Arakawa John Betts James Dixon 1915 Pine St 11330 198"Ave SE 18556 Vallarta Dr Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Issaquah Wa 98027 Huntington Beach Ca 92646 023 044-02 023-044 05 023 044-08 Joan Goetz Gary Hansen Stanley Johnson 1941 Pme St 1931 Pme St 1921 Pme St Huntmgton Beach,Ca 92648 Huntmgton Beach,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648 023 044 11 023-010 06 18,24 25 023-042-02 Mark Langer PLC Paul&Carol Warg 1911 Pme St 23 Corporate Plaza Dr�200 1952 Lake ST Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Newport Beach Ca 92660 7944 Huntmgton Beach Ca 92648 023 042 03 023 042 04 023-042-05 Winthrop Davenport Wemfeld Trust Douglas&Hoc Tran Michelson 1948 Lake St 1946 Lake St 1942 Lake St Huntmgton Beach Ca 92648 Huntmgton Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 - Cup 00 -39 23 04-- 06 023 043-01 023-043 02 even&Jennifer Vu Randall W Lyford Antonio&Haydee Enriquez 938 Lake St 19�1 Lake St 2130 Main St m 120 (untmgton Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 23 043 03 023 043 04 023-043 03 harles Ramey — Bent& Henni Chnstensen Michael O Brien 945 Lake St 1941 Lake St 1937 Lake St lunttngton Beach Ca 92648 Huntuigton Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 23 046 06 023 043 07 023-043 06 hilip McBride F Stephen Holm Ronald&Pam Poonsaegnsathit 935 Lake St 1931 Lake St 1932 Pine St funtington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 23 043-27 023 048-28 023-043-29 arl&Patncia Convery Glover Victor&Lon Vance Harry&Trudee Joe 936 Pine St 1938 Pine St 1942 Pine St luntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 �23 043-30 023-043-31 023-043-32 oan Gianatasto Michael Elsesser Lorraine Bennet -)411 Cabot Rd 9114 1948 Pine St 1952 Pine St aguna Hills Ca 92653-5517 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 12.) 044-01 023 031-18 023 031-19 ames& Gayle Wnght Lawerence&Elvira Hutchens Roy L Kung 948 Park St 1932 Park St 1929 Park St 4untington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 )23 031-20 023-031 21 023-031-22 Uiette&Roy Cota George Schultz David Christensen 1926 Park St 1922 Park St 1918 Park St 4untington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 )23 031-26 023 031-27 023-031-28 Allen Shomaker Timothy&Mary Bistolas Renard&Deanna Franklin 1906 Park St 1902 Park St 1901 Park St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 J23 031-29 023-031-30 023 031-31 Jeffrey Owens Franklin Yee Keith Holmes 190�Park St 1907 Park St 1911 Park St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 (P3 031-32 1 023-031-33 023-031-34 James Thomas Chnstme Bryden Jeffrey McDermatd 1915 Park St 1917 Park St 1921 Park St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 )23 -031 - 2� 02.3 -031---L3 0�L3-0-71-25 4-av ;O2�,tjel j C `112 1PRRk st iq r(e ?ARx S+ igog ARK S� 0 _ n .& 92(47 41iu k%&A tAoA AP-ACc1 CA ?xfw? u 44 , �oA ee" cA 92�' Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® Betty Jo Woollett 937-165 39 937-165-41 O C. Association of Realtors Mary K Haynes Robert Neal Warne 25552 La Paz Road 2405 Vista Nobleza 2323 Huntington St #902 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 937 165 52 937-165-22 937 16525 Madeline Reynolds David Tsong Chester Murch III 2323 Huntington St #1005 20381 Craimer Ln 1630 Manon Road Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Redlands, CA 92374 937 165 29 937- 164-75 937 16483 Laurel Freeman Nikhill Mehta Charles Doug Williams 15211 Newcastle Lane 13528 La Sierra 23690 Homes Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Chino Hills, CA 91709 Nuevo, CA 92567 023 041 07 937 15426 937 15435 Pacific CoastHomes/Chevron Celeste Ann Post Joan Van Alst Po Box 285 3421 Wexford #101 7412 Seabluff#103 Houston TX 77001 Las Vegas NV 89129 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 937 16541 023-020-03 023 044 11 Robert Warne HB Union High School District Mark Lagner 2323 Huntington St #902 10251 Yorktown Ave 1911 Pine St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 023-043-30 Joyce Holmes Norm Westwell Joan Gtanatasio 1911 Park St 17171 Englewood Circle 1946 Pine St Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 025-052-08 023 062 24 023-062-16 Neria Yomtoubian Lloyd Danielson Robert James Delmer PO Box 3595 1828 Main St 1812 Main St Newport Beach CA 92659 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 023 062-17 024-102 03 024-103-08 Darlene Cullum William Brown Hamilton Jeffrey Scott Freeman 1802 Main St 520 10"' St 314 Loma Ave Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 023-061-28 157 392-39 023-132-18 Keith Wichnei Robert Le Giue Eileen Murphy 1816 Park St 8401 Sweetwater Cir 201 2151 St Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 159-351-10 149 201 70 023-112-24 James Warren Thomas William Cerri Donald Mueller 6642 Trotter Dr 9561 Borba Cir 603 2151 St Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 aAVERYO Address Labels Laser 5960TM Smooth Feed Sheets TM Use template for 51600 159-233-27 155-233 17 145-072—18 Scott Clegg Richard Young Gordon Watson 18191 Ivorycrest 10092 Cliff Dr 6732 Shire Cir Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 163-212-04 146-492 02 155-233-18 John Kuyper Tina Drebushenko Gary Barton 17852 Shoreham Ln 5341 Overland Dr 10072 Cliff Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 155-231 07 023-062 23 023-062-19 James Hynes Randi Coddington Robert Smitt 10091 Clif Dr 1822 Main St 1821 Park St Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 023-063-07 023-191 24 159-472-24 Elizabeth Minnie David Mac Leod David Metsker 1747 Park St 858 San Nicolas Cir 18776 Park Brook Ln Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 146-043-30 Randy Kokal Michael Lopez 18507 Pueblo Cir 5182 Caliente Dr Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92649 SAVERV(D Address Labels Laser " 51600 Smooth Feed Sheets TM Use template for 51600 937-165-35 937-165-39 937-16-499 Karen Leland Occupant Occupant 2323 Huntington Apt 804 2323 Huntington Apt 808 215 Wicluta Apt 401 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 937-16-545 937-16 547 937-16-552 Occupant Occupant Occupant 2323 Huntington Apt 906 2323 Huntington Apt 908 2323 Huntington Apt 1005 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beac, Ca 92648 937-16-554 937-16-554 937-16-501 Occupant Occupant Occupant 2323 Huntington Apt 1006 2323 Huntington Apt 1007 215 Wichita Apt 403 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 937-16-512 937-16-505 93 7-16-513 Occupant Occupant Occupant 215 Wichita#505 215 Wichita#487 215 Wichita#506 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 93 7-16-514 93 7-16-517 937-16-518 Occupant Occupant Occupant 215 Wichita 4507 215 Wichita#602 215 Wichita#603 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 937-165-24 937-165-37 937-165-25 Occupant Occupant Occupant 2323 Huntington #701 2323 Huntington Apt 806 2323 Hunington#702 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 937-165-29 937-154-78 937-164-80 Occupant Occupant Occupant 2323 Huntington#706 606 Lake Apt#30 215 Wichita#106 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 )37-16-486 937-16 488 937-16-491 Dccupant Occupant Occupant )15 Wichita#204 215 Wichita#206 215 Wichita#301 Juntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 )37-16-492 937-164 93 937-164-98 occupant Occupant Occupant '15 Wichita#302 215 Wichita#303 215 Wichita#308 3untington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 137-15-416 937-154-26 937-164-75 )ccupant Occupant Occupant 371 Seabluff#104 19501 Ranch Apt 102 215 Wichita#10 Iuntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 0AVERY© Address Labels Laser 5960TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 937-164-83 937-165-25 937-165-41 Occupant Occupant Occupant 215 Wichita#201 2323 Huntington 4702 2323 Huntington#902 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 023 041-07 025-023017 025-052-08 Occupant Occupant Occupant 2120 Main St#260 2221 Alabama 214 Lincoln St Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntignton Beach, CA 92648 023-010-18 937-154-26 937-164-75 Occupant Occupant Occupant 2134 Main St 19501 Ranch 215 Wichita Apt 101 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 937-165 39 023-062-05 937-165-25 Occupant Occupant Occupant 2323 Huntington#808 1831 Park 2323 Huntington#702 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 023-043-30 937-164-83 Occupant Occupant 1946 Pine St 215 Wichita#201 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 aAVERYO Address Labels Laser 5960TM RECEIVED F / AND MADE A PART THp.Ft, 0FiD" � COUNCIL MEETING OF o OFFICEOFTH September 4, 2001 CONNE BROCKWAY CITY�CLERK ITEM# Dear Members of the Huntington Beach City Council My name is Joyce Holmes and I reside at 1911 Park Street My neighbors and I are opposed to the police department parking lot expansion at the current proposed location A year ago when this proposed action came up for the first time a petition was circulated and forwarded to members of the city council This petition contained approximately fifty downtown residents signatures All of these people were strongly against the destruction of the affected green area Several of us came to speak at a meeting to present our views and to offer alternative plans We waited until 10 00 then were told the public hearing was going to be delayed until Nov 6 2000 I personally attended the next meeting and waited until 2 30 am to speak and present my views and alternative suggestions It was at this time that a parking study was proposed and this matter was table until now I understand that you have been given copies of the past correspondence sent to the city council If this is not accurate please let me know and I will provide copies We believed a legitimate appeal had been made on our behalf last year but then were told that this appeal was now in question All we want is a chance to be heard and an opportunity to work with the city to find a better alternative to the current parking lot plan Please give us that chance When considering the proposed parking lot expansion please ask yourselves these questions? 1) Do we need this expansion? My observations, as well as the observations of several residents find that the lot never appears to be full, and personal vehicles have been spotted in the current fenced police lot 2) If, in fact, we do need more parking is this the only place available? I believe there are other solutions, such as enclosing a portion of the existing parking on the corner of Main and Yorktown This would be much less expensive and would not impact residential property or destroy a green area with old growth trees 3) Could the existing city hall parking lot be modified and reconfigured to gain more parking slots? YES111 I am more than willing to assist the city staff with this proposal 4) Is the proposed cost really the best use of these funds? This money could be used for wages, new equipment, to encourage carpooling, or a host of other needs When making your decision on this agenda item please consider every possible alternative Thank you all for your hard work and dedication to our city Whenever possible please protect our limited green areas and residential property Sincerely Joyce Holmes �t/I- a +tF(,�IVEU CI1 Y CLERK September 4 2001 CITY OF Cite of Huntington Beach HUNFINGTON BEACH CA 2001 SEP -u A 9 28 Mayor and Members of the City Council This letter is written to express our opposition to the expansion of the police parking lot that eliminates the beautiful green area adjacent to the current police parking lot There are several important reason for this opposition I refer to the letters filed August 2000 by several residents that still have valid reasons to oppose the approval of this parking lot expansion The cost involved to demolish the proposed area and install a permanent wall makes no financial sense In light of the City s financial situation and the more important issues at hand (i e the deterioration of the infrastructure) the cost of$400 000 + to unnecessarily expand this parking area does not demonstrate sound judgment on the part of those who promote and approve this expenditure The citizens of Huntington Beach are opposed to the increasing costs of running this city and the proposed tax increase to support inappropriate projects such as this Please put the money where it most makes sense-- into the infrastructure and beaches that make this city so fabulous In addition we remind you that one of the concerns raised by the residents living adjacent to this proposed project is the continuous noise pollution coming from inconsiderate officers who rev their engines sound their horns and sirens and conduct loud conversations that wake the neighbors -- all at the early morning hours To expand the parking only perpetuates the problem (refer to the attached letters) We would hope that the analysis that was to be conducted over the past year would take into consideration lighting and sound pollution impacts for the adjacent residents that have always been good citizens of the City Also many alternative solutions were proposed by the residents last year and we anticipate a full review of these suggestions In conclusion the residents adjacent to this project will affect all of us physically emotionally aesthetically and financially Property prices will go down noise and lighting problems will increase and we will lose the beautiful green area that was a significant decision to purchase our homes Please do not move forward with this parking lot expansion Thank you for your consideration in this matter I trust all of you will vote courageously against this project and keep some of the little beauty Huntington Beach has left Thoughtfully yours " Frank and Darleen Yee 1907 Park Street H B CA 92648 Wt COMMA c � � August 20 2000 Dear Members of the Planing Comnussion My wife and I write this letter regarding the second expansion of the police parking facility on Main Street We are not in favor of this second expansion and hope this Commission votes against the expansion We reside at 1907 Park Street In the ten years we have lived at this address this proposed project will be the second setback for us as residents on Park Street This proposed project will affect all of us physically emotionally aesthetically and financially It is not fair appropriate or considerate for us to be taken advantage of twice since these homes were built in such a short period of time It should be noted we have made verbal and written complaints about the light and noise problems originating from the traffic to and from the police parking area With the expansion of the parking facilities these problems can only get worse and it would be unfortunate that the Commission would take steps to only enhance these problems rather than minimize them In an effort to be part of the solution rather than only complainers my wife and I offer some thoughts for alternatives 1 more parking added along Lake Street 2 additional parking should be considered at the City parking facility on Gotherd. 3 utilize more parking on Yorktown by the City garage and Huntington Beach High School 4 Reconfigure existing parking where secondary vehicles can be parked elsewhere We propose and would support reallocation of the funds for this project to a project of greater need(i e police enforcement) The home owners on Park Street should not be taken advantaged of again by City government We support our Police Department and their needs when called upon to do so Fiscally sound projects and proposals have been supported by us and our neighbors We have all talked favorably about our Police Department to friends both in the City as well as other cities I know that should this project to expand the police parking lot be approved,we all would be very disappointed and feel that our City government and police have let us down We all need to be good neighbors-both the City government to the residents as well as the residents to City government Isn t it time that the government listened to usl Dear members let us keep City Hall visually appealing The green-black fencing at the corner of Yorktown and Lake Streets is awful Why not improve that corner and place a parking area there with beautiful landscaping to disguise the parking Form and beauty needs a greater standing in our City Especially near City Hall we need to preserve the sense of a landscaped monument Please consider tins thoughtfully The green, landscaped area of grass and majestic mature trees is the last monument of nature that the City Hall area has left In conclusion please do not move forward on this parking lot expansion Once paved, it will never ever go back to the green monument we have now Vote NO and consider another alternative The City of Huntington Beach as well as the residents of Park Street do not deserve a double lut by a second expansion of the same area that was miscalculated and nusludged a few years ago Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter and the chance to voice my opinion I trust all of you will vote courageously thoughtfully and with HEART not just your head Thoughtfully yours i Frank Yee 1907 Park St Huntington eac 92648 August 8 2000 Attention Commissioner Ed Kerins Dear Commissioner Kerins and Members of the Design Review Board, My husband and I recently received the attached notice regarding the expansion of the police department parking lot We are very distressed and are appealing to you to reconsider your recommendation to the planning commission We reside at 1911 Park Street We feel our property, along with our neighbors, will be adversely impacted by this expansion We have been residents of this neighborhood for over twenty years We left our last home two blocks away due to the increase in traffic noise that came about when Yorktown was rerouted When we moved into our current home we considered it to be our final move and our dream home We have, over the years spent a great deal upgrading with the thought in mind that this would be our home for the rest of our lives One of the things that attracted tlus lot to us was the quiet neighborhood Having the green belt behind us we viewed as an excellent noise buffer and an attractive view When the city expanded the lot the first time, we attended the city council meeting We discovered that our pleas to find an alternative plan feel on deaf ears It is my hope that the current city officials will be more open to discussion and more willing to consider other alternatives that will not adversely affect private homes My concerns are these 1) the effect of the increase of noise and night hghtmg on the livability of our rear bedrooms 21 the loss of a beautiful green area containing several mature trees 3) the loss of a recreation area often used by local families and high school groups Our family supports the Huntington Beach Police Department and believes it is entitled to the best facilities possible We also believe this can be achieved without negatively affecting the residential property surrounding City Hall I have walked around the parking lot area numerous times and at various times of the day and night There always seems to be numerous empty parking stalls An alternative I would like to propose is to expand the police lot toward Yorktown rather than toward Utica I realize that secure fencing will need to be added Another suggestion is that less frequently used vehicles be housed in a city yard on another site such as located on Gothard I hope that whenever possible residential property be given priority and be protected from noise pollution I also hope that any and all green areas be saved when other alternatives exist Thank you all for your hard work and dedication I know your job is never easy I would appreciate your consideration in this matter I hope you will agree with me that the existing green belt should stay as is and that this is the best thing for the entire neighborhood It is also my hope that you will explore other possible alternatives I would appreciate any feedback you could provide If there is any way that I can assist you, please let me know Sincerely Keith and Joyce Holmes 1911 Park Street (714) 536 - 4728 City of Huntington Beach Mayor and City Council It is my understanding that the city of Huntington Beach intends to expand the existing police parking lot by an additional ninety spaces The proposed location for the expansion is situated on the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue Currently, the property is attractively landscaped with a large grassy area and several trees In 1998, I purchased the residence at 1905 Park Street, where I currently reside The rear deck of my residence faces west, toward the proposed location of the parking lot expansion project The view of the trees and green belt area was a consideration in my purchase of this residence Replacing this attractively landscaped area with a parking lot will negatively impact the view from my deck and the property value of my residence I am also very concerned with the noise associated with a police parking lot, which will be utilized twenty-four hours a day I understand that this property is owned by the city and may be used for purposes deemed appropriate by city officials I am asking, however, that the mayor and city council members postpone the project long enough to consider other options, which may include -Reducing the size of the proposed expansion by 50% and maintaining the present landscaping throughout the remainder of the property -Relocating the project to another area If these options are not viable, I implore members of the city council to carefully consider constructing the proposed parking facility in such a way that it impacts local residents as little as possible The facility should be designed to guard the surrounding homes from the exposure of excessive noise and should be as aesthetically pleasing as a parking lot can be TFWens r your consideration, J (714) 960-8518 1905 Park Street Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 t Ake 1641 /L�JYLQ, ineeG64 � G� �"�, rrn �-3 �J Roger K Hosmer f 1836 Park St Huntington Bh CA 92648.2735 or " t 1 �..^ kr°t..`r �..~ l�l�llilllsl�llil�ti l�!{111lfl1�111i11llltly sl�itl!)�ilttlll `\ D �® 0 City ®f Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Phone 536 5271 Fax 3741540 `. 3741648 August 29 2001 Mr Roger Hosmer 1836 Park Street Huntington Beach CA 92648 RE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (POLICE DEPARTMENT PARKING LOT EXPANSION) Dear Mr Hosmer Thank you for your letter dated August 27, 2001 In your letter you express opposition to the proposed expansion plans Your letter and your concerns will be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration on this matter The subject request is scheduled for City Council consideration o V-SeptemI5e- -4t=and r� the recommended action is for the item to be continued toga date uncertain)If the project is re-activated you will be notified of the pending hearing Thank you for your interest If you should have any questions regarding the project please call Amy Wolfe, Associate Planner at 714-536-5075 Sincerely pp k if r I Herb Fauland Senior Planner C Mayor and City Council Connie Brockway City Clerk Howard Zelefsky Director of Planning Amy Wolfe Associate Planner f T / y J (g\hf\mscins\hosmer) Ir t 4 V T GG le --o= 4�� T1, J �pij, Cis r19 xxc� Aivi-mil Gt_ .�f< b�� rL�G,G4. � aAeQ -,too a �vLeaf� ��¢e .a�� ��-z�e �cwz�,� aa. uj Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk /l_ ,1 0/ P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 f� 93716.533 SCOTT D STERNBERG r INGTpy f` 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#802 Aro114rfc HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2849 ..a _ b fE14-323 92b482003 1800 13 Otj/28/01 FORWARD TIME E,,,P RTN TO SEND ` STERNBEG SCOTT D — 13900 MAROUESAS WAY APT 107 `�t�� 1je�►A �� MARINA DEL REY Cr, 902P2--',3 cFcppNTY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ex,461%t, '�'`'�1P 1 ll,l „ 1,1,Ii,,,1„11„1,lt,till,lll,l„11,,till„I1,i,,,1111 _ v Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 x x S k T,,k v527 c2-2A—f�l 937 16552 �pHSINGTpy Madeline Reynolds p�c ,ro,,,Eo B�, 2323 Huntington St 41005 �4 _ T, , ,. REYN323 926E+82003 1b00 13 08/28/01 FORWARD TIME E/R RTN TO SEND 0 RE i'NOLDS F� Q 1846 INGLET CT►F�`�,, `�O COSTA MESA CA 92a26-4840 pppMTY Ga LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Lso,&AYVP1 t,"" Il,l,,,till,ll,,,l„II„1,11, i Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 y � 023 06 C l' W111 F / 16 2 Oar H or Ln INGTpy� b �.n gton Be ch Ca 9264 8 Q =�coRro04rFo �• r � s "' TY r cp cP LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC H RINwC ,� _ Il,1,,,,{,{,11,1,!„li►,hill,l,,illl,{1111,1,I,I,1111,111i111 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach s Office of the City Clerk , r P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-434 I ST—rPHEN K PERZIGAN 7412 SEABLUFF DR"1C2 INGTpy� HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 � s PERZ412 926481019 1800 08 08/28/01 `- FORWARD TI1`1E E^P RTN TO SEND O PERZIGIAN STEPHEN F .1. 9999 W KATIE AVE LJNIT 1004 y QQ LAS VEGAS NV 89147-8348 cFppUMTY y�`\` - RFTI IMNI -M ,F=N F=Q LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING LT%a7CM1,s AN? 4l111,1�l1l,III1II�IIIIIIIII„�IIIIII�I„IIII�IIlI11{I��111111 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach + l Office of the City Clerk f P O Box 190 t Huntington Beach CA 92648 s x x 427 Ur—aA—m �7 937 15-419 JOE E.ROBERTSON SINGT UU 7371 SE4BLUFF DR:107 py HUrMNGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 iQ =�coero���Fo �l� ROBE371 9204451019 1700 08 08/28/01 �'+�-�i�►r=J. Q FORWARD rIt1E E/P RTN TO SEND ROBEPTSON �QQ Y CT C�ULA I5TA CA B V 5 A91913-1 7 04 y +� ccn nco pppNTY ILL LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ^^T 1 3 $f��T3{a)t1P � ��r�rrrr�r�r��rrr�rr��rr�r��rrrrrr���r�rr��irr�r�rr��r a rr�r�� _ f Connie Brockway City Clerk iQr City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937 15-427 GLADYS L.GRISWOLD I NGTpy 19501 RANCH LN#103 �t �rp.ro.,1,o HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6435 out P`\� h I I li r F(2 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 3L� fi$CG%44M AA? Ili rlrfl1 rrrrr11llr'rrllrrrlr�rrflrrirrlr�l �, Connie Brockway City Clerk r j City of Huntington Beach , Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 E / a Huntington Beach CA 92648 X yi 937-16-553 KAREN LYNN STEES 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#1006 INGTpy HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 McpRroft,4, Y—IC�.���� Ty R Q-EGAL N ICE - PUBLIC HEARING W.."m " d 13 t e%%p eri I"M 1111111111111111111111111111111111I111111111111111111111111111 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 4 Office of the City Clerk r P O Box 190 ' ,� Huntington Beach CA 92648 ' l r ` ,_ �mi' J L y � �IN��� 'tea.. ✓ a ! 37 16488 DA ARNOLD X 24042 IN I INGTp�, � IND OLIS IN 46224-0042 � �qA�_off Q CF ppUN TY LEGAL NOTICE - P --� - - 1 If11111111111111,1l 11111111111111 ii1i11Il11111ill illlill�l�i Connie Brockway City Clerk , City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk j P O Box 190 r - Huntington Beach CA 92648 9371s475 NIKFOL a ASHIMA MEHTA { I NGTpy 3 215 VACKTA AVE 10L �� HUNTXGTON BEACH CA 92648-2800 rY "LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING K �' �, r,'&Wri' k a V%► II 1 1 1 11 1 11 111 1111 Il 1111 I It Connie Brockway City Clerk - City of Huntington Beach , Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 - Huntington Beach CA 92648 xx A Ui 927 rY,1-a4-rj1 �D1\ry 937 15-441 nA`1�1 RAYMOND J &SHARON S PARRISH C l6� 7412 SEABLUFF OR 0109 ING Vb� i HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 v I S i7'Mn/il3 726485020 1500 11 08/34/O1 FORWARD TIME Er P RTN TO SEND Q PARRISI, 1409 MORNINC STAR Q EDt10ND OK 79034-uSSd RFTI IRI�I TC] SENDER pOpN TY ca` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING S le-64Ph-14`'� I`'�'t�¢ 11�► ��l,l�l1„�1� Il ,I i;� �>, lll�l, 11 II 1� it �I li Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 s Huntington Beach CA 92648 Tow,++ �4 OA ectalmRaASpN O 4 sullic e� Wot a elUsdO ko t Add, wn l� D No St,ch Street es (1 4 �b No R. Ice 1 Jre eo Such Nu )37-16-505 en19N T'hrs en�etoPe m Jccupant INGTpy J��� 415 Wichi G4487 -luntingtoCa 92648 I ' I IULT o r kTl)' ?R�i URN l p NAY cap _ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ��t�=��-��}1=���� �-'� IV,t, „I I,II!„l,►I1, I,il,,, „{11,1, 11 „{,1„11,►+„I 11 Connie Brockway City Clerk o t J City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 f Y x x N t1,k IaZ7 rY—24—�J I fo\� p14111 937-164-75 �oT Ocwpant �VhTINGTpy dq_o`j-off 215 Wichita#10 •c°"'° rE, Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 �v �f�!) ItE!►9 �Q W TO S I'� r"RI- E r-i r' e- I FCQUNTY C'P`\`C `N I J I J I LEGAL N `tCE I-PUBLICI HEARING r jL '���c �'a�t��°'z��o `��'�`` II,11,,,I,I,11,,,1,IIl„I,II„I„,III,II,II,I11,1„II,,,,II I1 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 - I 937-16-482 SANDRA H NOBLE 215 WICHITA AVE'108 h ING HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 Tpy�Fq NOBL215 -?2o482004 1500 06 08/29/01 FORWARD IIME E P RTN TO SEND 9 Q NOBLE SANDRA f-OPE y `1` 645 N LANGcR DR Q ANAHEIt1 CA-92801-4/18 NTI LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk �_ } P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 1 x x ; 'k c H S427 q$-24-q1 TOO 937 16-507 GARY 8 DALLAS DAY 215 WICHITA AVE#409 �pl1SINGTpy � HUNTINGTON BEACH C4 92648-2879 ppGNTY t �UGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 1 t 1 ssr.4�s�S c�'iUt1a {,� ,ti{i{►{{itifi�{{,t�i{{itittt{{{t{►t�{�i�lt{�t{I,tiii{i{i Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach r r ! Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 _ R Huntington Beach CA 92648 r yc � ar if k N s H 927 fr-24-sit I U u [r DDRESS 937 15-4 6 U t cr '-t REFUSED t{ FREYMANN RONALD&JANET I VON 1 F U krdOWN �t i T Vp 7540 58TH AVE NE P044 � 3 L o c'T d E OLYMPIAti�A93516-9305 ro��rfc f9 \ -L')-Et NO ORDER NOT �7 I IVERABLE A$ V y TO D FORWARD UNABLE 9 s oQ �pppN TY Ca�� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING =3$01"— 4 11 1 1 1 li 1 11 1 11 fill if It 11 1 It Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 n� r Huntington Beach CA 92648 �� J t,��� N i 4j 527 q`r,-zA-�3'1 V 937 16-539 Q MARY K HAYNES 263 CHESTERFIELD I NGTpy NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660-4223 s r FAfN26 92b60-02- IN OS 08/28/01 RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE `Q UNA8Lt 10 F1-t OWAHU 9 ,� RETURN TO SENDER yc�ppUNT v ca�� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 1 �� Office of the City Clerk PO Box 190 1J Huntington Beach CA 92648 i v 937-16 525 U CHESTER E.P NqICf H I iUR('-1 159 ORANGE PA.RV �phSINGTp�, REDLANDS CA 92274 5543 -- _ - -- ---- p� � _ s MURC159AC 923742058 1600 60 08/28101 FORWARD TIME E P RTN TO SEND MURCH OQ 1630 MAR-CON RD REDLANDS CA 92374-6300 �pUNTY ca` RETURN TO SENDER LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING s�1?4 k\.A1\r' III f l if 11 of 11 Is J NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday September 4 2001 at 7 00 p m in the City Council Chambers 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning item ❑ 1 APPEAL BY FORMER COUNCIL MEMBER AND MAYOR PRO TEM TOM HARMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (POLICE DEPARTMENT PARKING _ - -� LOT EXPANSION) (CONTINUED FROM THE NOVEMSER 6, 2000 MEETING) Appellant Tom Harman former Council Member and Mayor Pro Tern Applicant City of Huntington Beach Request Appeal of the Planning Commission s decision to approve the expansion of the existing 108-space secured Police Department parking lot by adding 90 secured parking spaces for a total of 198 parking spaces Location 2000 Main Street (City Hall northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue) Assigned Planner Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ON FILE A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk s Office 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach California 92648 for inspection by the public A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk s Office after August 31 2001 _ ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and ev--ess op nio^s — -or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above If you challenge the City Council s action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street 2nd Floor Huntington Beach California 92648 (714) 536-5227 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk PO Box 190 JAI Huntington Beach CA 92648c)A 1I x x `, H r, ,k 927 ��%'�— t1—Ul 023 02 Walter eusen 1 S41 Park St INGTpy Huntui each 9264 8 IT(, Y iMUR'rr, - F i 11 Sp;l LR ppNTY LEGAL NOTICE- Puk FEARING F I � -- '�^t 6 4 8—O 1 3 U - — fli�iii�lilifll n��if�iililltfiiil(ftsl�tllrii�i��ill n u tlil� ' �� i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 Council/Agency Meeting Held 16_-<)3 Deferr ontl ue to —00 IJApproved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied CI Cler Ignature, Council Meeting Date October 16 2000 Department ID Number PL00-57 D — o u Z I t (� _76417- )A°v^I"}' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WU T FOR ACTION G. C�7 SUBMITTED TO HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS— SUBMITTED BY RAY SILVER City Administratora4d PREPARED BY HOWARD ZELEFSKY Director of Planning/ SUBJECT APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Huntington Beach Police Department Parking Lot Expansion) Statement of Issue Funding Source Recommended Action Alternative Action(s) Analysis Environmental Status Attachment(s) Statement of Issue Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman appellant of the Planning Commissions approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 This application represents a request by the Public Works Department on behalf of the Police Department to expand the existing 108 space secured Police parking lot at the Civic Center complex by adding 90 secured spaces Associated site improvements include perimeter landscaping perimeter fencing new double swing security gate and asphalt paving of a 0 7- acre landscape area at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue The Planning Commission and staff are recommending approval (Recommended Action) based upon the following ♦ General Plan goals and objectives for the continuation of public safety uses that support the neeas of existing and future residents and businesses and the provision of adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands ♦ Project compliance with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) Development Standards The project is in compliance with building setback and perimeter landscaping standards PL00 57 doc 2 10/6/00 8 31 AM r REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 ♦ Project compatibility with adjacent residential land uses The proposed design as conditioned will provide adequate separation and landscape screening between the proposed parking area and adjacent residences The parking lot will be utilized for City owned vehicles only and parking on the easterly portion of the site will be restricted to detective vehicles in order to minimize noise impacts to adjacent residential areas The existing security gate will be replaced with a double swing gate to minimize gate related noise to adjacent residential areas Parking lot illumination will be designed to prevent spillage onto adjacent areas Noise will be mitigated by replacing the existing sliding gate with a double swing gate and by restricting parking on the easterly portion of the lot for detective vehicles ♦ The proposed parking lot expansion will permit the continuing operation of Police Department public safety services at the Civic Center site and contribute towards maintaining high quality levels of service and addressing community protection demands ♦ A decorative permanent perimeter screen wall will be constructed within 2 years from project approval to enhance the appearance of the project and views into the site On September 1 2000 an appeal to the Planning Commissions action was filed by Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman The cited reasons for the appeal are as follows ♦ Loss of open space at the Civic Center complex ♦ Impacts to adjacent residents ♦ Costs associated with constructing a block wall around the parking lot as imposed by the Planning Commission Funding Source Not Applicable Recommended Action PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION Motion to Approve Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with findings and conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO 1) Planning Commisslon Acton on August 22, 2000 THE MOTION MADE BY KERINS SECONDED BY MANDIC TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (ATTACHMENT NO 5) CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE PL00 57 doc 3 10/6/00 8 31 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 AYES LIVENGOOD MANDIC BIDDLE CHAPMAN KERINS SPEAKER NOES NONE ABSENT NONE ABSTAIN SHOEMAKER MOTION PASSED Alternative Action(s) The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s) 1 Deny Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with findings for denial 2 Continue Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and direct staff accordingly Analysis A PROJECT PROPOSAL Applicant City of Huntington Beach Location 2000 Main Street (Northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue) Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 represents a request by the Public Works Department on behalf of the Police Department to expand the existing 108 space secured Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center by adding 90 secured spaces pursuant to Section 214 06 PS District Land Use Controls Public Safety Facilities of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO) The 90 secured parking space expansion will occupy the majority of the area at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue and will require paving of approximately 0 7 acres of existing landscape area The parking lot expansion is an extension of the existing Police Department facility and is proposed to be screened by a 10 ft high perimeter chain link fence with dark green fence fabric to match the screening of the existing parking lot A ten ft wide landscape area will be provided between the proposed perimeter fence and the property line along Main Street A 15 ft wide landscaped area will be provided between the perimeter fence and the Utica Avenue property line The existing sliding gate is proposed to be replaced with a double swing gate No modifications to the existing 7 ft high masonry wall and 20 ft wide landscaped area along the easterly property line are proposed Parking lot lighting will provide a minimum 0 6-foot candle with a uniformity ratio of 4 1 within the project site Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare PL00 57 doc 4 10/6100 8 31 AM d REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 B BACKGROUND On March 3 1992 the Planning Commission conditionally approved Conditional Use Permit No 92-8 and allowed the expansion of the Police Department parking lot by 27 spaces The expansion involved extending the existing parking lot 67 ft into the landscape area towards Utica Avenue The parking lot expansion was conditioned to serve as a temporary parking facility until a parking structure was constructed at the Civic Center C PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND RECOMMENDATION On August 22 2000 the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit NO 00-39 Three letters against the project were submitted for consideration One speaker spoke in opposition of the project and expressed concerns about increased noise project lighting and loss of open space mature trees and recreational area The Planning Commission discussed issues relating to parking of employee vehicles the source of funds for the proposed parking lot improvements the necessity of 24-hour project lighting the need to impose a maximum light level and DRB recommendations The Commission approved the project with modified conditions in order to mitigate any potential impacts to adjacent residential areas In summary the Planning Commission required the following modifications - Intensified perimeter landscaping to buffer the proposed parking lot expansion from adjacent residential uses - Replacement of 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio - Addition of trees between the access driveway and the paved parking lot to screen the parking lot from the residences to the east - Intensified use of shrub materials along Main Street and Utica Avenue - Replacement of the perimeter chain link fence with a decorative exterior block wall within two years of project approval - Restrict parking on the easterly portion of the site to detective vehicles only - Provision of cut-off or dimmed lighting after 10PM along the parking lots perimeter D APPEAL On September 1 2000 Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman submitted an appeal (Attachment No 2) of the August 22 2000 Planning Commission action to approve the subject proposal The cited reasons for the appeal were loss of open space impacts to adjacent residents and cost associated with constructing a decorative masonry wall around the Police Departments secured parking lot Since the projects approval by the Planning Commission the City has received an additional 12 letters opposing the project PL00 57 doc 5 1016100 8 37 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 E STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION The three main issues are project impacts to adjacent uses loss of open space and required blockwall cost All three subjects are discussed in detail below Please refer to the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment No 5) for a complete analysis of the project 1) Impacts to Adjacent Single-Family Residential Setbacks The proposed parking lot will be located approximately 110 ft (20 ft alley + 20 ft perimeter landscape buffer + 35 ft driveway + 35 ft landscape area) from the existing single-family homes to the east and 75 ft (15 ft perimeter landscape buffer + 60 ft Utica Avenue right-of- way) from the existing residential properties to the south The existing 20 ft wide perimeter landscape area between the existing accessway to the parking lot and the alley to the east is proposed to remain An additional 35 ft wide landscape area will be provided on the west side of the driveway to separate and partially screen the proposed parking area from the properties to the east A 15 ft wide landscape area will be provided along the south property line to screen the proposed facility from residences across Utica Avenue (please refer to Attachment No 3) The proposed landscaping and the 110 ft and 75 ft setbacks will adequately separate and screen the parking lot from adjoining residential uses Llghting/Glare Lighting is proposed to be installed within the parking area The proposed illumination levels will provide adequate lighting to ensure personnel and property security Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east and south from potential light spillage and glare A lighting plan has been required to be submitted for review and approval prior to operation to ensure no impacts will occur The lighting plan will provide cut- off or dimmed lighting along the parking lots perimeter after 10PM Based on the proposed lighting plan shields and cut-off or dimmed lighting no impacts to adjacent residential areas are anticipated Nolse It is expected that noise levels will increase as a result of the proposed 90 parking space expansion In an effort to minimize noise impacts to adjoining residential areas the proposal includes replacement of the existing sliding gate with a double swing gate The aforementioned measure will address noise generated by the sliding gate as it slides on its track and noise from cars driving over the track The proposed parking lot will be utilized for patrol investigative and support vehicle parking Investigative and support vehicles are used less frequently than patrol cars Therefore in PL00 57 doc 6 10/6/00 8 31 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 anticipation of noise impacts generated by cars leaving and opening/closing of doors staff recommends that investigative and support vehicle parking be restricted to the easterly portion of the site which is adjacent to existing residential development This restriction will minimize parking space use by multiple vehicles during the day and night and associated noise impacts The proposed swing gate restricted parking and parking lot separation from adjacent residential areas will ensure reduction of noise impacts to the maximum extent possible 2) Loss of Open Space Land Use The proposed parking lot expansion will occupy the majority of the area at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue and will require paving of approximately 0 7 acres (30 492 sq ft ) of existing landscape area The area is not currently utilized for any specific function but does provide perimeter landscaping and contributes to the aesthetic quality of the Civic Center The parking lot expansion site is a part of the Civic Center complex and was never designated or anticipated as open space in the Civic Center Master Plan The applicable landscaping ratio for the Civic center site is 8% The proposed parking lot expansion and associated loss of landscaping will result in a reduction of 3% After the proposed parking lot improvements a total of 29% of the Civic Center Complex site will be landscaped Staff has concluded that the importance of continuing police services from the Civic Center Complex while maintaining adequate on-site landscaping and providing an aesthetic design for the project is consistent with the Civic Center Master Plan Landscaping/Screening The project area is currently landscaped with turf and contains six mature trees and three smaller trees within the central portion of the site In addition seventeen trees are located along the easterly area adjacent to the alley Implementation of the proposed parking lot will require the removal of the six existing mature trees in the central portion of the lot Staff recommends replacement of the 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio in accordance with HBZSO requirements The submitted conceptual landscaping plan provides minimal landscaping in the interior portion of the lot that is screened from public view and secured for safety purposes Intensified landscaping is proposed along the parking lot s perimeter in order to capitalize on aesthetic benefits and screening Staff supports the landscaping concept and recommends that additional trees be planted in the interior area between the access way and the parking lot in order to screen to the greatest extent possible the parking lot from the two story PL00 57 doc 7 10/6/00 8 31 AM I i REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16,12000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 residences to the east Staff believes that the proposed replacement of the existing mature trees at a 2 1 ratio and the recommended intensified landscaping will adequately screen and enhance the projects appearance from street frontages and adjacent residential development 3) Cost of the Blockwall Penmeter Fence Design A 10 ft high chain link fence with dark green fence fabric is proposed along the parking lot s perimeter to screen the vehicles from public view and provide security The proposed fence materials and colors are consistent with the adjoining parking lot expansion approved in 1992 Staff supports the proposed fence design on a temporary basis This is based on the fact that the previous parking lot expansion was permitted as a temporary parking facility and there are no near term or future plans to construct a multi-story structure to address the Police Departments parking needs However staff recommends that the proposed fence be approved for only a two-year period At that time the chain link fence for the entire secured parking lot (current parking lot expansion and 1992 parking lot) shall be replaced with a decorative screen wall compatible in design colors and materials with the Civic Centers architecture The recommended screen wall upgrade is consistent with previously imposed conditions on development along the City s Urban Scenic Corridors (Main Street Beach Boulevard Goldenwest etc ) and is intended to enhance the visual image of the project and the Civic Center Penmeter Fence Cost The total estimated project cost is $392 000 Of that amount $162 000 will be allocated to remove the chain link fence for the entire Police Department secured parking lot and replace it with a decorative masonry wall within two years Staff believes that the recommended perimeter block wall is necessary in order to improve the parking lot s appearance from Main Street and Utica Avenue provides increased security and screening and further reduces impacts to adjacent residential development The cost for the parking lot expansion is far less than the projected estimate of $1 500 000 necessary to construct a parking structure of comparable size Staff believes that the project as conditioned represents the best fiscal solution to the parking issue and mitigates impacts to adjacent residential development therefore staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed expansion PL00 57 doc 8 1016/00 8 31 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 F SUMMARY Staff believes that the proposed parking lot expansion as conditioned will not adversely affect existing residential uses and be compatible with the surrounding area Staff recommends approval of the project based on the following ♦ General Plan goals and objectives for the continuation of public safety uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses and the provision of adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands ♦ Project compliance with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) Development Standards The project is in compliance with building setback and perimeter landscaping standards ♦ Project compatibility with adjacent residential land uses The proposed design as conditioned will provide adequate separation and landscape screening between the proposed parking area and adjacent residences The parking lot will be utilized for City owned vehicles only and parking on the easterly portion of the site will be restricted to detective vehicles in order to minimize noise impacts to adjacent residential areas The existing security gate will be replaced with a double swing gate to minimize gate related noise to adjacent residential areas Parking lot illumination will be designed to prevent spillage onto adjacent areas Noise will be mitigated by replacing the existing sliding gate with a double swing gate and by restricting parking on the easterly portion of the lot for detective vehicles ♦ The proposed parking lot expansion will permit the continuing operation of Police Department public safety services at the Civic Center site and contribute towards maintaining high quality levels of service and addressing community protection demands ♦ A decorative permanent perimeter screen wall will be constructed within 2 years from project approval to enhance the appearance of the project and views into the site Environmental Status The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class 1 Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states that minor alteration of public facilities involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing does not require further environmental review PL00 57 doc 9 10/6100 8 31 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER PL00-57 Attachment(s) NumberCity Clerk's Page 1 Findings and Suggested Conditions of Approval 2 Appeal Letter dated September 1 2000 3 Site Plan dated June 9 2000 and Landscaping Plan dated August 4 2000 4 Narrative 5 Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 22 2000 6 Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated August 22 2000 7 Letters in Opposition and/or support RCA Author`'Amy Wolfe/Herb Fauland PL00 57 doc 10 1016/00 8 31 AM ATTAC „7 � �' �3' � �xro ' 3 3 3 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA The City Council finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states that minor alteration of public facilities involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing does not require further environmental review FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 1 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 request to expand the existing 108 parking space secured Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center complex site by adding 90 parking spaces will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood Based upon the proposed design and conditions imposed adequate separation and landscape screening will be provided between the proposed vehicle parking area and adjacent residential uses A mimmum 110 ft and 75 ft buffer area will be provided between the parking lot and the easterly and southerly residential uses respectively Trees will be planted within the parking lot to screen paved parking areas from adjacent single family dwellings The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project approval 2 The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because the most easterly portion of the parking lot expansion area will be designated for detective vehicle parking only in order to minimize noise from frequent maneuvering into and out of parking spaces and from opening and closing vehicle doors In addition the existing sliding gate shall be replaced with a double swing gate to reduce the noise generated by the sliding gate as it slides on its track and the noise from cars driving over the track 3 The proposed parking lot expansion will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance in addition to any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located A 10 ft wide perimeter landscaping area will be provided along the Main Street frontage in accordance with HBZSO requirements A 15 ft wide landscaped area along Utica Avenue will exceed perimeter landscape requirements by 5 ft Six (6) existing mature trees to be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio 4 The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property In addition it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan Land Use Element L U 2 Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure utility infrastructure and public services (00c1822 I) LU 13 1 Provide for the continuation of existing and development of new uses, such as governmental administrative public safety, human service cultural educational infrastructure, religious, and other uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses Public Facilities and Public Services Element PF 1 1 Provide adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands and provide protection for the community from illicit activities and crime The proposed parking lot expansion will permit the continuing operation of Police Department public safety services at the Civic Center site and contribute towards maintaining high quality levels of service and addressing community protection demands CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 P 1 The site plan received and dated June 9 2000 and landscape plan received and dated August 4, 2000 shall be the conceptually approved plans with the following modifications a The landscape plan shall be revised to reflect replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of such trees, to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east Final tree selection shall be subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect b The landscape plan shall use ground cover throughout the project site to be reviewed and approval by the City Landscape Architect Intensified use of shrub materials shall be use along the Main Street and Utica Avenue perimeter landscape area c Parking lot striping detail shall comply with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Title 24, California Administrative Code (Code Requirement) d Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan Utility meters shall be screened from view from public nghts-of-way Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view (Code Requirement) e Energy saving lamps shall be used for parking lot lighting All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations Cutoff or dimmed lighting shall occur after 10 00 PM along the perimeter edge to mitigate any potential glare onto adjacent residential properties 2 Prior to issuance of grading permits the following shall be completed a A grading plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer shall be submitted for review and approval (PW) b Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of grading permits and shall be referenced in the index (00c1822 2) c A Landscape and Imgation Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location type size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials, an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a two to one ratio (2 1) with minimum 36 inch box trees and shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. (PW) (Code Requirement) d A hydrology and hydraulic analysis for the proposed on-site drainage improvements shall be prepared and submitted for approval (PW) e In accordance with NPDES requirements a"Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer Best Management Practices" shall be identified and incorporated into the design (PW) f The grading/erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD s Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control (PW) g The name and phone number of the contractor's field supervisor who will be on-site shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Public Works Department In addition clearly visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site at 250 ft intervals indicating whom to contact for information regarding this development and any construction/ grading activity Tlus contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity He/she will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities, truck routes construction hours, noise, etc Signs shall include the telephone number of the contractor's contact person, the City s contact person (Jack Miller at 714-536-5517) regarding grading and construction activities and 1-800- CUT-SMOG' if there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No 403 (PW) h All property owners and tenants within 300 ft of the perimeter of the project shall be notified of a tentative grading schedule at least 15 days prior to such grading (PW) 1 If the import or export of materials is required a truck haul route plan shall be developed and coordinated with the Public Works Department This plan shall include the approximate number of truck trips and the proposed haul route It shall specify the hours that transport activities can occur and the methods to mitigate construction related impacts to adjacent residents and public facilities These plans must be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval (PW) j Site plans and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls walls and fences consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department Double walls shall be prohibited Prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls The (00c1822 3) plans shall include section drawings, a site plan and elevations The plans shall identify materials seep holes and drainage 3 During grading and site development\the following shall be adhered to a Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available for use throughout the day dunng site grading to keep the soils damp enough to prevent dust from being raised by the operations (PW) b All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 8 00 a m and leave the site no later than 5 00p in and shall be limited to Monday through Fnday only (PW) c Areas to be graded or that are being graded shall be thoroughly wet down in the late morning and after work is completed for the day (PW) d The construction disturbance shall be kept as small as possible (PW) e All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface prior to leaving the site to prevent dirt and dust from impacting the surrounding areas (PW) f Prior to leaving the site all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site onto a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets and other access ways (PW) g Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas (PW) h Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site to enclose the work area (PW) i Use low sulfur fuel ( 05%) by weight for construction equipment, j Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts) k Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts 4 Prior to final inspection the following shall be completed a All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including 1) Landscaping, (PW) 2) Adequate space shall be provided between the swinging gates and the keypad operating the gate to pull up with the gate closed (PW) b The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department (00c1822 4) c Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department d All building spoils, such as unusable lumber wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them 5 Prior to the operation of the secured Police Department parking facility the following shall be completed a A parking management plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to parking lot operation The submitted plan shall designate the two most easterly rows of the parking lot expansion area for investigation and support vehicle parking only b A lighting plan depicting proposed lighting fixture design and site placement shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to parking lot operation Parking lot lighting shall provide a minimum 0 6 foot candle with a uniformity ration of 4 1 within the project site Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare 6 The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project completion The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center architecture 7 The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with The Plammng Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council s action and the conditions herein If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS 1 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 shall not become effective until the ten calendar day appeal period has elapsed 2 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is October 16, 2001 or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date 3 The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No 00-39, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs 4 The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein (00c1822 5) 5 Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7 00 AM to 8 00 PM Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays 6 All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission (OOc1822 6) �N i NOTICE OF APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION OF 08-22-00 Date of Planning Commission Action TO Planning Dept (2 copies) DATE 09-01-00 City Attorney (1 copy) FILED BY Tom Harman, Mayor Pro Tem REGARDING Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 - for the expansion of the HBPD parking lot located at 2000 Main Street Tentative Date for Public Hearing To be determined Copy of Appeal Letter attached LEGAL NOTICE AND A P MAILING LIST MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE Connie Brockway City Clerk x5227 0�� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO Connie Brockway, City Clerk VIA Ray Sdver, City Administrator -FROM Tom Harman, Mayor Pro Ter - l DATE September 1, 2000 SUBJECT APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Huntington Beach Police Parking Lot) I am hereby appealing the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 for the expansion of the Huntington Beach Police Department parking lot located at 2000 Main Street The grounds for my appeal are 1 Loss of open space on the Civic Center complex 2 Impacts to adjacent residences 3 Costs associated with constructing a block wall around the parking lot as unposed by the Planning Commission TH SH rink xc Ron Lowenberg Police Chief Howard Zelefsky Director of Planning Scott Hess Principal Planner Herb Fauland Senior Planner Amy Wolfe Associate Planner G%adm1tr\00\0900sh I s W C S 1t , ' I, , , , 11` 1. I 1 --------------------------------------===============---=------=----____=== � ------=--- --- { - ��_-}--_ Y YIY iala■1rt�1 Lti__ __Y1`-�__-_---�93- I \ \ - -------------------- 1 � I lil > > a uj 1r 000000 goop fill -MIL JL.1L ■ • ■ • ■ ■ M ■ • / -�t'_p■�►1--r_ {■ r ? r ■Ir r Ia IN r r to +■ �■ ■ r ■ ■ r ■ r r r I iti i1v " I \ 0000 , / — I I I I I I i I -------I-- -J -a {�`I I t ' ■ • O IM v ■ ■ ■ r s r ■ i ■ % �/ a r� rm rr► I - - - - - - - - - - - -LL a MAIN STREET v tow m for wn Unew and 5•tric■ Nvl �� "~�� PRELIMINARY LAYOUT �� cap TOLL I1iEE —ZL'S�— ■••• ••• ICE POLICE PARIONG LOT EXPANSION ' or -Boll-424-41 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA w� 4TY HUNTINGf01 BEACH 17W1 m oar a ... to ovyw■mw of ruan war" p y�.��M_�>_rrxi^J,pcw�cl�.�cr tilmoea.mns +�I ."�.1.._.r S 1! J I{ , 0 �� �y�r��1u�LF._j�5...• rt_ a* u h S�*mml 7 A/.Lmp—r Jim" um �. 'y� '! j{, ��t T y[�n°3������'�+1�9k �I t7i'� tt ( It 4 C � �I �, �I ✓V '.� �il �� '' di�� ° ,I�� 41��1` !� t'�L�J��ptJ�;S�,"t �+) �,....._�i rl rl- � ---{ w I '"",�i � I�— -•• �� �E � y �� � td+��t�_yY._ �� W7 LYT„� i,.. �1�( I i �a�� L[t-7�� I{'¢d' L•,� lj_' .►'T1L, t 1 lr y �� .� w-uY,!r�#��� fix',, �? � JYe 11�.;}I��I EEC� •]V JrY I+�{,n �- ►' rid fib! �` � ���`t�'�'j��'�tl� 51��a''il��,.�r����?��`� '" �a�Fy�''v �'y,Jr'!i`F �1?b1�•c � Wi��1jp(}l �vi L` v �� r / `l JI I r ��� t Hw1it a Illy, 31 Irto 4j *Ike ,yy 1 ai'1 41 roi4li�+l...r•(#� VL" x>YS �r J�h �� a afgclw ' III �y4� la I ��� ri° `a Ho �(� �i y n , 1� _ L. v {� •zj.a .,R.�Jta Y]F _ yJl I/Ipp3ry111 n.0 a ICW M U dwWro d Sufic AJv1 REVISIONS eye y m� mo�r��ew +� PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN ame Coll TOLL FREE POLICE PARKING LOT EXPANSION ' ..—�.: 6W 422 /13 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA q N HUNTUICiON BEACH t no un oot a m T i � � L. ►_ rr'�� " S �A g�Il�lw ) (rtwV J �i tl 1 1 N� I I I tt I Fl 1 T q � cu)Gi �} "r��tia,J I I ' I I _ r 1 A j�YI Irt�i�kk if Ally J >5u y 1 r A f 7t y +h}rt cr F t y �S I { Al j RpN i ) �In hf PAG IO SALYS55 fT'�14 1 Xd �t lrSf Ati,Cj^ ,�C �i� O fir J c t r t r M �r r �'yjyY yL ��! t4` 3i� ' � s�4"! k t S +0 +x r 3 e �� m u rr r ` n ni o ~ y r/ .i... T t�t �i,,,,,,���, �/� � dort �`,v,�_ � � r fJ` r1+ �,,tr J�¢4 '"W'� �p N S>�• ; ti \`�. `,�.", r t `rt��`rt nrI ;w Ez,d 'qr1�+�t � t 4,r 0 7 !' y 4i 4 r r.�fyt< ;4?�tiL Vtrx hy� r �^41 ri T �Sr 1A+11 ,i�J M1 � � �r f•�(,K�ji y,�� T ; f r,� �eA {tyk�t `s ;�'b yl�t it, ��s]o�kls�w M L�k'� �� t �/rt G l v rj S �.r d)�� u+Pva 1 J�9j}t'�� q )1�t6S tpfirrTRw *a�14�j` st r ' yrtlP '�� 4 rI I I �r J-� IJiry TsaL ,^ t jr 1 M1 t g . WY �l1" t ' { � 4 1 61'�4�+► L „c• u� y"I�C 7��AF754�;�y��:+a'~.�.Lia�L�GLLL7..'IYJ Y•r rlaP} ��I A+ IMU M i�f M U dr w 4 S ric Alrt REYMONS PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN _ _ POLICE PARKING LOT EXPANSION Cd ` l TOLL FREE �'� �� . HUNTINGTON BEACH CA ar EOO 422 413.1 �UuUNKWGTON BEACH V m I�ID 731 I � I I L - I -- AEaT -- — -- PAIKWG LOT AMM LiJ rrA^nN.i ra.Ic / TIME 1"M TI I I I I I I I I I I I I lH3[VAR" J _ Icz JI[ mtcuol SNU MCILc 0M I n — OTWID CONE mlC ON MAIN STREET .e r U da a,Id S A Al I NEWSIONS PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN i PO FREE �27 d,[ LICE PARKING LOT EXPANSION cal TOLL „�: w E00 ^^'�^ HUN—crON BEACH CA yy��EyTQ� Fe 01 rOF NUNIINGTON BEACH T I mean r " , x � � ,.. � ,� "' � �� ,� ems, #� �,� �a� � �. r ,.` u � ,� �� POLICE PARKING LOT EXPANSION HUNTINGTON BEACH CIVIC CENTER 2000 Main Street PROJECT NARRATIVE The City of Huntington Beach Police Department currently suffers from a shortage of secure parking for its personnel The Departments parking needs include space for both the City owned fleet as well as personal vehicles Personnel are currently forced to park in unsecured areas of the Civic Center and on curbed landscaped areas within the secured parking lot The existing secure parking is located on the southwest corner of the Civic Center adjacent to the Police Department and was last expanded in 1993 The parking lot is surrounded by a 10 high chain link fence with dark green fence fabric One monitored gate, which is located off of Utica Avenue is currently used to access the lot This lot currently has parking for 108 secure spaces The Department also utilizes a non-secure area of the Civic Center just north of the Police Department which has 63 spaces This brings the total amount of existing parking to 171 spaces The City s Police Department fleet at the Civic Center consists of 215 vehicles This number does not include personal vehicles The goal of the expansion will be to build an adequate number of parking spaces for city-owned police vehicles and to create a "secure" area due to the costly computer and radio systems contained within the vehicles The new parking expansion will allow the police department to locate exclusively city-owned police vehicles in the lower parking lot located off of Utica Police employees will then be able to use the entire "upper" parking lot located just north of the police building In an effort to provide additional secure parking the Police Department is requesting approval to expand its existing secure parking lot to the south The expansion will provide approximately 90 additional spaces The vehicles that will occupy the parking spaces within the new expansion area will be those used primarily during normal business hours This will include detective and support staff cars in order to minimize the impact on the neighboring residences The patrol cars that are utilized 24-hours per day, seven days per week will be parked next to the police building to minimize any noise issues The proposed project will be bordered on the west by Main Street on the south by Utica Avenue and on the east by a residential screen wall and alley On May 18 2000 a Development Assistance Committee meeting was held to discuss this project The following pertinent items were discussed and agreed to by the Police Department 1 One tree per 10 stalls will be planted per code 2 Due to grading and the location of the existing trees relative to the required geometry of the parking the existing trees will be removed and replaced at a 2 1 ratio per code This is in addition to item 1 3 Approximately 30% of the area to be improved will be landscaped (8% minimum is required by code) 4 The expanded parking lot will be surrounded by a 10 high chain link fence with dark green fence fabric to match the existing lot 5 Landscaping will be provided in the area between the proposed fence and the existing sidewalk C\TEMP\PlannmgNarrative 1 doc % r 6 Lighting will provide a minimum of one-foot candle within the lot Shields will be utilized as needed to protect the residential neighborhood to the east 7 Drainage will be collected at the southwest corner of the site and drain to an existing catch basin at the intersection of Utica Avenue and Main Street The Huntington Beach Police Department looks forward to City approval and completion of this much-needed project C\TENMPlannmgNarrativeI doc NT 5 , % waT!: ~ a ^ - > y i ƒ ® ` ` o r JJ -Citrof Huntington Beach Plan ning'Department r STAFF REPORT, HUMINGTUN BELCH TO Planning Commission FROM Howard Zelefsky, Director of Planning BY Amy Wolfe, Associate Planner DATE August 22, 2000 SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Huntington Beach Police Department Parking Lot Expansion) APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER City of Huntington Beach LOCATION 2000 Main Street (NEC of Main Street and Utica Avenue) STATEMENT OF ISSUE Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 request - Expand the existing 108 space secured Police Department parking lot area at the Civic Center complex by adding 90 secured spaces - Site improvements include perimeter landscaping perimeter fencing, new double swing security gate and asphalt paving of an 0 7 acre landscape area at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue Staffs Recommendation Approve Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with modifications based upon the following - General Plan goals and objectives for the continuation of public safety uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses and the provision of adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands - Project compatibility with adjacent residential land uses The proposed design as conditioned will provide adequate separation and landscape screening between the proposed parking area and adjacent residences Noise will be mitigated by replacing the existing sliding gate with a double swing gate and by restricting parking on the easterly portion of the lot for detective vehicles - A decorative permanent perimeter screen wall will be constructed within 2 years from project approval to enhance the appearance of the project and views into the site - Project compliance with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) Development Standards The project is in compliance with building setback and perimeter landscaping standards 8 Mc r. - m.m PROJECT a` SITE s� — il R20 Pp oho r N N ¢ �l1-w•fA d be R2 0 PO �� r aamrui iOLLY-SEACLIFF m = Vx r '•' SPECIFIC PLAN ..�•�. �b� % ^ �� R2 O CO � r 0 -O-CD �z o-P C � i R20w` R2 CF-E-CD S0''0 R2-0-Co a a( (R CF-E-CD -co 0 (RI 0! �5 IF P N I c U a Cl7 0 �a CF E (Di Co. r o► co-o o I co- -unc -cD 0 r .+ CD CF—R ��+ RI RI RI RI RI R2 CD 0 r ai-o( ter" - v es ego -� Ir VICINITY MAP CONDITIONAL USE PERNHT 00-39 DESIGN REVIEW 00-30 THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH C � Staff s Suggested Modifications Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 - Replacement of 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio in accordance with HBZSO requirements - Replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of trees, to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east - Intensified use of shrub materials along the Main Street and Utica Avenue landscape perimeter area - Replacement of the perimeter chain link fence for the entire secured Police Department parking area with a decorative exterior block wall within two years of project approval The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center s architecture - Restrict parking on the easterly portion of the site to detective vehicles only to minimize parking by multiple velucles and associated noise generated impacts RECOMMENDATION Motion to `Approve Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with findings and suggested conditions of approval (Attachment No 1) " ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S) The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as A "Deny Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with findings for denial " B "Continue Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 and direct staff accordingly ' PROJECT PROPOSAL Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 represents a request by the Public Works Department on behalf of the Police Department to expand the existing 108 space secured Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center by adding 90 secured spaces pursuant to Section 214 06, PS District Land Use Controls, Public Safety Facilities, of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO) The 90 secured parking space expansion will occupy the majority of the area at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue and will require paving of approximately 0 7 acres of existing landscape area The parking lot expansion is an extension of the existing Police Department facility and is proposed to be screened by a 10 ft high perimeter chain link fence with dark green fence fabric to match the screening of the existing parking lot area to the north of the project site A ten ft wide landscape area will be provided between the proposed perimeter fence and the property line along Mann Street A 15 ft wide landscaped area will be provided between the perimeter fence and the Utica Avenue property line The existing sliding gate is proposed to be replaced with a double swing gate No modifications to the existing 7 ft high masonry wall and 20 ft wide landscaped area along the easterly property line are proposed Staff Report—8/22/00 2 (00sr52) Parking lot lighting will provide a minimum 0 6 foot candle with a uniformity ration of 4 1 within the project site Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare The request is necessary (Attachment No 3) because additional secured parking is necessary for City owned Police Department fleet vehicles Background On March 3, 1992, the Planning Commission conditionally approved Conditional Use Permit No 92-8 and allowed the expansion of the Police Department parking lot by 27 spaces The expansion involved extending the existing parking lot 67 ft into the landscape area towards Utica Avenue The parking lot expansion was conditioned to serve as a temporary parking facility until a parking structure was constructed at the Civic Center ISSUES Subtect Property And Surrounding-Land Use,Zoning And General Plan Designations LOCATION ,GENERAL PLAN ZONING` & ' , 4 , LAND USE Subject Property P (Public) PS (Public-Semipublic) Civic Center- open space North of Subject CO-F2 (Commercial CO (Office Commercial- Office Park Property Office—0 5 FAR) Oil Overlay) East of Subject RMH-25-d (Residential RMH-A (Medium High Single-family Property Medium High Density— Density Residential) Residential 25du/ac—design overlay) South of Subject RL-7 (Residential Low RL (Low Density Single-family Property Density—7du/ac) Residential) Residential West of Subject P (RL) - (Public w/ PS (Public-Semipublic) HB High School Property Residential Low Density underlying designation) General Plan Conformance The General Plan Land Use Map designation on the subject property is P (Public) The proposed project is consistent with this designation and the goals and objectives of the City s General Plan as follows Staff Report—8/22/00 3 (00sr52) A Land Use Element L U 2 Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure, utility infrastructure and public services L U 13 1 Provide for the continuation of existing and development of new uses, such as governmental administrative, public safety, human service, cultural, educational infrastructure, religious, and other uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses B Public Facilities and Public Services Element PF 1 I Provide adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands, and provide protection for the community from illicit activities and crime The proposed parking lot expansion will permit the continued operation of the Police Department at the Civic Center and contribute towards maintaining levels of service while addressing community protection demands Zoning Compliance SECTION ISSUE CODE PROVISION PROPOSED 21408 Setbacks Front (Yorktown) loft 260 ft Side (Main) 10 ft 10 ft Side (Park) 10 ft 145 ft Rear(Utica) 10 ft 15 ft 232 08 A General Planting 13 ac (8%) 4 6 ac (29%) Provisions 232 08 C Off-street Parking Facilities—Perimeter Landscaping Front (Yorktown) 10 ft loft Side (Main) loft 10 ft Side (Park) 10 ft 10 ft Rear(Utica) loft 15 ft This project is located in the PS (Public-Semipublic) zone and complies with the requirements of that zoning district The proposed parking lot expansion conforms to minimum parking lot development standards including parking stall design circulation and perimeter landscaping Twenty nine percent (29%) of the entire Civic Center complex site will remain landscaped after project implementation Staff Report—8/22/00 4 (00sr52) A minimum 10 ft landscaped area will be provided along the Main Street frontage in compliance with parking lot design standards A 15 ft landscaped area is proposed along Utica Avenue which will exceed the minimum parking perimeter landscaping requirement by 5 ft Environmental Status The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states that minor alteration of public facilities involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing does not require further environmental review Coastal Status Not applicable Redevelopment Status The project is located in the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project, Yorktown-Lake subarea The Economic Development Department has reviewed the subject proposal and is in support of the proposed request Design Review Board On August 10, 2000, the Design Review Board (DRB) approved the proposed design and landscaping plan for the Police Department parking lot expansion design subject to the following recommended conditions a The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project approval The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center s architecture b The submitted landscape plan shall be revised to reflect either replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of such trees,to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east Final tree selection shall be subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect c The submitted landscape plan shall be revised to reflect intensified use of shrub materials along the Main Street and Utica Avenue landscape perimeter area The Police Department is in agreement with the above DRB conditions Subdivision Committee Not applicable Staff Report—8/22/00 5 (00sr52) ( r Other Departments Concerns The Departments of Public Works and Building and Safety have recommended conditions which are incorporated into the conditions of approval The Fire Department and Economic Development Department have no concerns Pirbhc Notification Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Independent on August 10 2000 Notices were sent to property owners of record within a 300 ft radius of the subject property and individuals/organizations requesting notification(Planning Department's Notification Matrix) Staff has received verbal comments in opposition of the proposal by two adjacent property owners The two property owners have expressed concerns with anticipated noise and visual impacts associated with the loss of existing landscaping area and the proposed design of the perimeter fence Application Processing Dates DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S) Conditional Use Permit July 20 2000 October 20 2000 ANALYSIS The proposed parking lot expansion will occupy approximately 0 7 acre of landscaped area at the northeast corner of the Main Street and Utica Avenue The area is not currently utilized for any specific function by any City Department but does provide landscaping and contributes to the aesthetic quality of the Civic Center The primary issues to consider in evaluating this project are a) land use compatibility with existing residential development to the east and b) aesthetics Discussion on each issue follows Land Use Compatibility Setbacks The proposed parking lot will be located approximately 110 ft from the existing single family homes to the east and 75 ft from the residential properties to the south The existing 20 ft wide landscape area between the existing accessway to the parking lot and the alley to the east is proposed to remain An additional 35 ft wide landscape area will be provided on the west side of the driveway to separate and partially screen the proposed parking area from the properties to the east A 15 ft wide landscape area will be provided along the south property line to screen the proposed facility from residences across Utica Avenue (please refer to Attachment No 2) The proposed landscaping and setbacks adequately separate and screen the parking lot from adjoining residential uses Staff Report—8/22/00 6 (00sr52) Lighting/Glare Lighting is proposed to be installed within the parking area for personnel and property safety The proposed illumination levels will provide a minimum 0 6 foot candle with a uniformity ration of 4 1 Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare A lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to operation to ensure no impacts will occur Noise It is anticipated that noise levels will increase as a result of the proposed 90 parking space expansion In an effort to minimize noise impacts to adjoining residential areas the proposal includes replacement of the existing sliding gate with a double swing gate The aforementioned measure will address, noise generated by the sliding gate as it slides on its track and noise from cars driving over the track The proposed parking lot area will be utilized for patrol and detective vehicle parking Detective vehicles are used less frequently than patrol cars Therefore, in anticipation of noise impacts generated by cars leaving and opening/closing of doors, staff recommends that detective vehicle parking is restricted to the easterly portion of the site This restriction will minimize parking space use by multiple vehicles during the day and associated noise impacts Aesthetics Landscaping/Screening The proposed parking lot expansion is currently landscaped with turf and contains six mature trees and three smaller trees within the central portion of the site In addition seventeen trees are located along the easterly landscape area adjacent to the alley Implementation of the proposed parking lot will require the removal of the existing trees in the central portion of the lot Staff recommends replacement of the 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio in accordance with HBZSO requirements The submitted conceptual landscaping plan provides minimal landscaping in the interior portion of the lot that is screened from public view and secured for safety purposes Intensified landscaping is proposed along the parking lot's perimeter in order to capitalize on aesthetic benefits and screening Staff recommends approval of the plan subject to either replacement of the proposed palms in the interior area between the accessway and the parking lot area with an alternative tree type or addition of an alternative tree type to the proposed palms in order to screen, to the greatest extent possible, the parking lot from the two story residences to the east Fencing A 10 ft high chain link fence with dark green fence fabric is proposed along the parking lot s perimeter to screen the vehicles from public view and provide security The proposed fence materials and colors are consistent with the adjoining parking lot area expansion approved in 1992 Staff Report—8/22/00 7 (OOsr52) Staff supports the proposed fence design on a temporary basis This is based on the fact that the previous parking lot expansion was permitted as a temporary parking facility, and there are no near term plans to construct a multi-story structure to address the Police Department's parking needs However staff recommends that the proposed fence be approved for only a two year period At that time the chain link fence for the entire secured parking lot(current parking lot expansion and 1992 approved parking) shall be replaced with a decorative screen wall, compatible in design, colors and materials with the Civic Center's arclutecture SUMMARY ♦ The proposed 90 space parking lot expansion, will maintain its current accessway to the Police Department secured parking area from Utica Avenue The existing 7 ft high concrete block fence and 20ft wide landscaped area along the easterly property line will not be modified ♦ The parking lot will be utilized for City owned vehicles only and parking on the easterly portion of the site will be restricted to detective vehicles in order to minimize noise impacts to adjacent residential areas ♦ The existing security gate will be replaced with a double swing gate to minimize gate related noise to adjacent residential areas Parking lot illumination will be designed to prevent spillage onto adjacent areas ♦ The proposed chain link fence will be replaced within two years from project approval with a decorative masonry wall compatible in colors and materials with the Civic Center's design ♦ The project will implement a) General Plan Land Use Element goals and objectives for the continuation of public safety uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses, b) General Plan Public Facilities and Public Services Element goals and objectives for the provision of adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands, c) will be in compliance with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Development Standards, and d) will be compatible with adjacent residential uses Staff recommends approval of the proposal with the following modifications - Provision of intensified perimeter landscaping to buffer the proposed parking areas from adjacent residential uses to the east and south - Replacement of 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio in accordance with HBZSO requirements - Replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of trees to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east - Intensified use of shrub materials along the Maui Street and Utica Avenue landscape perimeter area Staff Report—8/22/00 8 (OOsr52) - Replacement of the perimeter chain link fence for the entire secured Police Department parking area with a decorative exterior block wall within two years of project approval The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center s architecture - Restrict parking on the easterly portion of the site to detective vehicles only to minimize parking space use by multiple vehicles and associated noise generated impacts ATTACHMENTS 1 Findings and Suggested Conditions of Approval 2 Site Plan dated June 9, 2000 and Landscaping Plan dated August 4, 2000 3 Narrative 4 Letters in Opposition or Support SHHFAWk�I Staff Report—8/22/00 9 (OOsr52) ATTACHMENT NO 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section Class 1, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states that minor alteration of public facilities involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing does not require further environmental review SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 1 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 request to expand the existing 108 parking space secured Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center complex site by adding 90 parking spaces will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood Based upon the proposed design and conditions imposed adequate separation and landscape screening will be provided between the proposed vehicle parking area and adjacent residential uses A minimum 110 ft and 75 ft buffer area will be provided between the parking lot and the easterly and southerly residential uses respectively Trees will be planted within the parking lot to screen paved parking areas from adjacent single family dwellings The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project approval 2 The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because the most easterly portion of the parking lot expansion area will be designated for detective vehicle parking only in order to minimize noise from frequent maneuvering into and out of parking spaces and from opening and closing vehicle doors In addition the existing sliding gate shall be replaced with a double swing gate to reduce the noise generated by the sliding gate as it slides on its track and the noise from cars dnving over the track 3 The proposed parking lot expansion will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance in addition to any specific condition required for the proposed use ii the distnct m which it would be located A 10 ft wide perimeter landscaping area will be provided along the Main Street frontage in accordance with HBZSO requirements A 15 ft wide landscaped area along Utica Avenue will exceed perimeter landscape requirements by 5 ft Six (6) existing mature trees to be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 1 1 C 4 The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property In addition it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan Land Use Element LU2 Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure, utility infrastructure and public services LU 13 1 Provide for the continuation of existing and development of new uses, such as governmental administrative public safety, human service, cultural, educational infrastructure, religious and other uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses Public Facilities and Public Services Element PF I 1 Provide adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands, and provide protection for the community from illicit activities and crime The proposed parking lot expansion will permit the continuing operation of Police Department public safety services at the Civic Center site and contnbute towards maintaining high quality levels of service and addressing community protection demands SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 1 The site plan received and dated June 9, 2000 and landscape plan received and dated August 4, 2000 shall be the conceptually approved plans with the following modifications a The submitted landscape plan shall be revised to reflect replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access dnveway and the paved lot area with an alternative canopy tree species Final tree selection shall be subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect b The submitted landscape plan shall be revised to reflect use of turf in lieu of bark as a ground cover throughout the project site c Parking lot stnping detail shall comply with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Title 24, California Admuustrative Code (Code Requirement) d Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not lunited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed m subsurface vaults Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view (Code Requirement) e Energy saving lamps shall be used for parking lot lighting All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 12 2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed a A grading plan prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval (PW) b Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of grading permits and shall be referenced in the index c A Landscape and Imgation Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Arclutect which identifies the location type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a two to one ratio (2 1) with minimum 36 inch box trees and shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. (PW) (Code Requirement) d A hydrology and hydraulic analysis for the proposed on-site drainage improvements shall be prepared and submitted for approval (PW) e In accordance with NPDES requirements a"Water Quality Management Plan' shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer Best Management Practices ' shall be identified and incorporated into the design (P`V) f The grading/erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD s Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control (PW) g The name and phone number of the contractor's field supervisor who will be on-site shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Public Works Department In addition clearly visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site at 250 ft intervals indicating whom to contact for information regarding this development and any construction/grading activity This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity He/she will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein specifically, grading activities, truck routes construction hours, noise etc Signs shall include the telephone number of the contractor's contact person, the City's contact person (Jack Miller at 714-536-5517) regarding grading and construction activities and 1-800-CUT-SMOG" if there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No 403 (P`V) (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 1 3 h All property owners and tenants within 300 ft of the perimeter of the project shall be notified of a tentative grading schedule at least 15 days prior to such grading (PW) 1 If the import or export of materials is required a truck haul route plan shall be developed and coordinated with the Public Works Department This plan shall include the approximate number of truck trips and the proposed haul route It shall specify the hours that transport activities can occur and the methods to mitigate construction related impacts to adjacent residents and public facilities These plans must be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval (PW) j Site plans and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls, walls, and fences consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department Double walls shall be prolubited Prior to the construction of any new walls a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls The plans shall include section drawings, a site plan and elevations The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage 3 During grading and site development\the following shall be adhered to a Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available for use throughout the day during site grading to keep the soils damp enough to prevent dust from being raised by the operations (PW) b All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 8 00 a in and leave the site no later than 5 00p m and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only (PW) c Areas to be graded or that are being graded shall be thoroughly wet down in the late morning and after work is completed for the day (PW) d The construction disturbance shall be kept as small as possible (PW) e All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface prior to leaving the site to prevent dirt and dust from impacting the surrounding areas (PW) f Prior to leaving the site, all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site onto a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets and other access ways (PW) g Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas (PW) h Wind bamers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site to enclose the work area (PW) i Use low sulfur fuel ( 05%) by weight for construction equipment j Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts), (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 14 i k Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts 4 Prior to final inspection the following shall be completed a All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including 1) Landscaping, (PW) 2) Adequate space shall be provided between the swinging gates and the keypad operating the gate to pull-up with the gate closed (PW) c The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department d Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department e All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them 5 Prior to the operation of the secured Police Department parking facility the following shall be completed a A parking management plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to parking lot operation The submitted plan shall designate the two most easterly rows of the parking lot expansion area for detective vehicle parking only b A lighting plan depicting proposed lighting fixture design and site placement shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to parking lot operation Parking lot lighting shall provide a minimum 0 6 foot candle with a uniformity ration of 4 1 within the project site Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare 6 The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project approval 7 The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein If the proposed changes are of a substantial (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 1 5 I C nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS 1 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 shall not become effective until the ten calendar day appeal period has elapsed 2 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is August 22 2001 or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date 3 The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No 00-39, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs 4 The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein 5 Construction shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7 00 AM to 8 00 PM Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays 6 All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission (OOSR52)—8/22/00 Attachment No 1 6 I * � E , Tw � �! » ` f \ �14 I i DRAFT MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2000 Councfl Chambers- Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Cahforiva STUDY SESSION - 5 15 PM (Room B-8) SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY (SRO) ORDINANCE—Rosemary Medel HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE—Rosemary Medel DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN— Wayne Carvalho AGENDA REVIEW—Herb Fauland PUBLIC COMMENTS—None REGULAR MEETING- 7 00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE P P P P P P P ROLL CALL Shomaker, Kerins, Mandic, Chapman, Biddle, Livengood, Speaker AGENDA APPROVAL Anyone wishing to speak must fill out and submit a form to speak No action can be taken by the Planning Commission on this date unless the item is agendued Any one wishing to speak on items not on tonight s agenda or on non-public hearing items may do so during ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Speakers on items scheduled for PUBLICBEARING will be invited to speak during the public hearing (4 MINUTES PER PERSON,NO DONATING OF TIME TO OTHERS) A ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE B PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS � � V f � URAFT B-1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39'(HUN=TINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT PARKING LOT EXPANSION) APPLICANT City of Huntington Beach LOCATION 2000 Main Street (City Hall, northeast comer of Main Street and Utica Avenue) PROJECT PLANNER Amy Wolfe • Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 request - Expand the existing 108 space secured Police Department parking lot area at the Civic Center complex by adding 90 secured spaces - Site improvements include perimeter landscaping, perimeter fencing, new double swing security gate and asphalt paving of an 0 7 acre landscape area at the northeast comer of Main Street and Utica Avenue • Staffs Recommendation Approve Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with modifications based upon the following - General Plan goals and objectives for the continuation of public safety uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses and the provision of adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands - Project compatibility with adjacent residential land uses The proposed design, as conditioned will provide adequate separation and landscape screening between the proposed parking area and adjacent residences Noise will be mitigated by replacing the existing shding gate with a double swing gate and by restricting parking on the easterly portion of the lot for detective vehicles - A decorative permanent perimeter screen wall will be constructed within 2 years from project approval to enhance the appearance of the project and views into the site - Project compliance with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance(HBZSO) Development Standards The project is in compliance with building setback and perimeter landscaping standards • Staffs Sumsted Modifications Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 - Replacement of 6 existing mature trees at a 2 to 1 ratio in accordance with HBZSO requirements - Replacement of the proposed palms in the interior landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of trees, to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east - Intensified use of shrub materials along the Main Street and Utica Avenue landscape perimeter area - Replacement of the perimeter chain link fence for the entire secured Police Department parking area with a decorative exterior block wall within two years of project approval. The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center's architecture - Restrict parking on the easterly portion of the site to detective vehicles only to mmirni e parking by multiple vehicles and associated noise generated impacts PC Minutes 8/22/00 2 a� d (OOPCM822) Commissioner Shomaker stated that she would be abstaining from taking action on this item as she lives within 300 feet of the proposed project Commissioner Mandic stated that she was advised by the City Attorney's office that she can speak on this proposed project Herb Fauland, Senior Planner, stated that they received a letter dated August 22, 2000, from Frank Yee opposing the proposed project THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Joyce Holmes, 1911 Park Street, presented copies of Attachment 4-1 (letter dated August 8, 2000) Ms Holmes spoke in opposition to the request Concerns expressed were increase in noise pollution, lighting at night, loss of green area, loss of mature trees, and loss of a recreation area THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED The Commission discussed parking of employee vehicles, source of funds, the necessity for 24- hour lighting,the need to impose a maximum light level, landscaping, the Design Review Board's suggestions for intensified landscaping, a silent gate, and reduced lighting to prevent glare Captain Jon Arnold, City of Huntington Beach Police Department, representing the applicant, requested modifications to the conditions as follows Condition 1 a Change the wording to reflect the Design Review Board's(DRB) recommendation by deleting the words"canopy tree species"and replace with"alternative tree type or the addition of such trees, to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east " Condition 1 b Change to reflect the DRB's recommendation by stating that the landscape plan shall use ground cover throughout the project site to be reviewed and approval by the City Landscape Architect Intensified use of shrub materials shall be use along the Main Street and Utica Avenue perimeter landscape area. Condition 5 a Delete the words"detective vehicle parking only"and replace with "investigation and support vehicle parking only" Condition 6 Add that "the design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center architecture " 9, RAFT- I PC Mmutes 8/22/00 3 (OOPCM822) s q n�n z�rom�r � R A FT,�, A MOTION WAS MADE BY KERINS, SECONDED BY MANDIC, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE AYES Kerins, Mandic, Chapman, Biddle,Livengood, Speaker NOES None ABSENT None ABSTAIN Shomaker MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEOA The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section Class 1, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states that minor alteration of public facilities involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing does not require further environmental review FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 1 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 request to expand the existing 108 parking space secured Police Department parking lot at the Civic Center complex site by adding 90 parking spaces will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood Based upon the proposed design and conditions unposed, adequate separation and landscape screening will be provided between the proposed vehicle parking area and adjacent residential uses A minimum 110 ft and 75 ft buffer area will be provided between the parking lot and the easterly and southerly residential uses respectively Trees will be planted within the parking lot to screen paved parking areas from adjacent single family dwellings The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project approval 2 The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses because the most easterly portion of the parking lot expansion area will be designated for detective vehicle parking only in order to minimize noise from frequent maneuvering into and out of parking spaces and from opening and closing vehicle doors In addition,the existing sliding gate shall be replaced with a double swing gate to reduce the noise generated by the sliding gate as it slides on its track and the noise from cars driving over the track 3 The proposed parking lot expansion will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance in addition to any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located A 10 ft wide perimeter landscaping area will be provided along the Main Street frontage in accordance with HBZSO requirements A 15 ft wide landscaped area along Utica Avenue will exceed perimeter landscape requirements by 5 ft Six(6) existing mature trees to be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio PC Minutes 8/22/00 4 r (OOPCM822) Rtil ^F �a 4 The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan Land Use Element LU 2 Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation ulf-astructure, utility infrastructure and public services. LU 13 1 Provide for the continuation of existing and development of new uses, such as governmental administrative, public safety,human service, cultural, educational, infrastructure, religious, and other uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses Public Facilities and Public Services Element PF 1 1 Provide adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands, and provide protection for the community from illicit activities and crime The proposed parking lot expansion will permit the continuing operation of Police Department public safety services at the Civic Center site and contnbute towards maintaining high quality levels of service and addressing community protection demands CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 1 The site plan received and dated June 9, 2000 and landscape plan received and dated August 4, 2000 shall be the conceptually approved plans with the following modifications a The landscape plan shall be revised to reflect replacement of the proposed palms in the mtenor landscaped area between the parking lot access driveway and the paved lot area with an alternative tree type or the addition of such trees, to screen the paved parking area from the residences to the east Final tree selection shall be subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect b The landscape plan shall use ground cover throughout the project site to be reviewed and approval by the City Landscape Architect Intensified use of shrub materials shall be use along the Main Street and Utica Avenue perimeter landscape area. c Parking lot stnping detail shall comply with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Title 24, California Administrative Code (Code Requirement) d Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan Utility meters shall be screened from view from public nghts-of-way Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view (Code Requirement) e Energy saving lamps shall be used for parking lot lighting All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations Cut off or dimmed hghtiing shall occur after 10 00 PM along the perimeter edge to mitigate any potential glare onto adjacent residential properties PC Minutes 8/22/00 5 �+ !y (OOPCM822) FJ ay 'AJ v i fr 2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed a. A grading plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval (PW) b Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all the working drawing sets used for issuance of grading permits and shall be referenced in the index. c A Landscape and Irrgation Construction Set must be submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location,type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials, an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and apphcable Design Guidelines Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a two to one ratio (2 1) with minimum 36 inch box trees and shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. (PW) (Code Requirement) d A hydrology and hydraulic analysis for the proposed on-site drainage improvements shall be prepared and submitted for approval (PW) e In accordance with NPDES requirements, a"Water Quality Management Plan" shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer "Best Management Practices" shall be identified and incorporated into the design (PR) f The grading/erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control (PW) g The name and phone number of the contractor's field supervisor who will be on-site shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Public Works Department In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site at 250 ft intervals indicating whom to contact for information regarding this development and any construction/grading activity This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity He/she will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities, truck routes, construction hours,noise, etc Signs shall include the telephone number of the contractor's contact person, the City's contact person (Jack Miller at 714-536-5517) regarding grading and construction activities, and"1-800- CUT-SMOG" if there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No 403 (PW) h. All property owners and tenants within 300 ft of the perimeter of the project shall be notified of a tentative grading schedule at least 15 days prior to such grading (PW) PC Mmutes 8/22/00 6 (OOPCM822) � ! A E i If the import or export of materials is required, a truck haul route plan shall be developed and coordinated with the Public Works Department This plan shall include the approximate number of truck trips and the proposed haul route It shall specify the hours that transport activities can occur and the methods to mitigate construction related impacts to adjacent residents and public facilities These plans must be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval (PW) j Site plans and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls, walls, and fences consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department Double walls shall be prohibited Prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls The plans shall include section drawings, a site plan and elevations The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage 3 During grading and site development\the following shall be adhered to a. Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available for use throughout the day during site grading to keep the soils damp enough to prevent dust from being raised by the operations (PW) b All haul trucks shall amve at the site no earlier than 8 00 a m. and leave the site no later than 5 00p m., and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only (PW) c Areas to be graded or that are being graded shall be thoroughly wet down in the late morning and after work is completed for the day (PW) d The construction disturbance shall be kept as small as possible (PR) e All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface prior to leaving the site to prevent dirt and dust from impacting the surrounding areas (PW) f Prior to leaving the site, all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site onto a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets and other access ways (PR) g Comply with appropriate sections of AQ1vhD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas (PW) h. Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site to enclose the work area. (PW) L Use low sulfur fuel( 05%)by weight for construction equipment, j Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts), k Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts 4 PC Mmutes 8/22/00 7 (OOPCM822) 4 Prior to final inspection the following shall be completed a. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including 1) Landscaping, (PW) 2) Adequate space shall be provided between the swinging gates and the keypad operating the gate to pull-up with the gate closed (PW) b The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department c Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department d All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire,pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them, 5 Prior to the operation of the secured Police Department parking facility the following shall be completed a. A parking management plan shall be submitted to the Plannng Department for review and approval prior to parking lot operation. The submitted plan shall designate the two most easterly rows of the parking lot expansion area for investigation and support vehicle parking only b A lighting plan depicting proposed lighting fixture design and site placement shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to parking lot operation. Parking lot hghting shall provide a minimum 0 6 foot candle with a uniformity ration of 4 1 within the project site Light fixture shields will be utilized to protect the residential development to the east from potential light spillage and glare 6 The perimeter chain link fence shall only be permitted on a temporary basis The entire Police Department secured parking area perimeter chain link fence shall be replaced with a decorative block wall within two years of project completion The design of the wall shall be compatible with the Civic Center architecture 7 The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process Bu.ildmg permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO PC Minutes 8/22/00 8 i (OOPCM822) i W l �t INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS 1 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 shall not become effective until the ten calendar day appeal period has elapsed 2 Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval which is August 22, 2001 or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date 3 The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No 00-39, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs 4 The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein 5 Construction shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7 00 AM to 8 00 PM Construction shall be prolubnted Sundays and Federal holidays 6 All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission PC Minutes 8/22/00 9 rjo.,.O�A�LWWT (OOPCM822) i r 71 NP , fLli a, -N�_ � '- .3i, a 1937 Ptne Street Hunttngton Beach, CA 92648 Telephone 714-960-9665 August 9, 2000 Attention Howard Zelefsky Planning Director City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr Zelefsky DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NO 00-30/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 Huntington Beach Police Department Parking Lot Expansion—Main and Utica Please read our concerns into the record of your August 10, 2000 meeting as this time is not convenient to most working people We understand that the City proposes turning a park-like lot into a parking lot We are unformed by the Planning Department that green screening on chain link fencing, similar to what is presently in place around the Police Department, will be installed around the proposed parking lot, even though there will be exterior landscaping The Police Department is not a temporary structure and the building of a permanent decorative wall around it is way overdue, particularly as the jail is housed there All the exterior screening, including existing temporary screening, should be permanently removed and replaced with a block stucco wall and landscaping to match the Civic Center complex Screening directly across the street from a high school and a skate board park is not acceptable The foot traffic in this area is heavy and open to vandalism The neighbors on Lake, Pine and Park streets already have had severe theft problems from their mailboxes located on the back alleys Most importantly,the City has no program in place to maintain this type of screening which gives the appearance of a blighted area There are various areas in the city which have vacant lots and are screened in this manner and other members of the public have already complained to City Council about the lack of maintenance A perfect example is the lot at Lake and Yorktown which has been in dispute for a number of years In the past this screening has been sprayed with graffiti and allowed to deteriorate, even thought it sits directly across from City Hall The only time it is replaced is when we contact the City and request replacement Graffiti was left on the screening for weeks even after it was reported to the City, though it is a well-known fact that it should be removed immediately to prevent further occurrences Even now,the old screening is thrown on the ground behind the recently replaced screening A more blatant example is the screening around the Beach and Yorktown Walgreens development which is directly en route to the Civic Center, every panel of which has been slashed within the first couple of weeks of installation We trust that this matter will be reconsidered Installing a parking lot is bad enought To surround it with more screening is unacceptable If you are going to do ajob, do nt nghtf Sincerely, John Thomas cc Mayor Dave Garofalo, Council Members Julien,Bauer,Dettloff, Green,Harman and Sullivan City Manager Ray Silver r i August 8 2000 R E C E I V E Attention Commissioner Ed Kerins A U G 10 2000 Dear Commissioner Kerins and Members of the Design Review Board Department of Planning My husband and I recently received the attached notice regarding the expansion of the police department parking lot We are very distressed and are appealing to you to reconsider your recommendation to the planning commission We reside at 1911 Park Street We feel our property along with our neighbors will be adversely impacted by this expansion We have been residents of this neighborhood for over twenty years We left our last home two blocks away due to the increase in traffic noise that came about when Yorktown was rerouted When we moved into our current home we considered it to be our final move and our dream home We have over the years spent a great deal upgrading with the thought in rind that this would be our home for the rest of our lives One of the things that attracted this lot to us was the quiet neighborhood Having the green belt behind us we viewed as an excellent noise buffer and an attractive view When the city expanded the lot the first time we attended the city council meeting We discovered that our pleas to find an alternative plan feel on deaf ears It is my hope that the current city officials will be more open to discussion and more willing to consider other alternatives that will not adversely affect private homes My concerns are these 1) the effect of the increase of noise and night lighting on the livability of our rear bedrooms 2} the loss of a beautiful green area containing several mature trees 3) the loss of a recreation area often used by local families and high school groups Our family supports the Huntington Beach Police Department and believes it is entitled to the best facilities possible We also believe this can be achieved without negatively affecting the residential property surrounding City Hall I have walked around the parking lot area numerous times and at various times of the day and night There always seems to be numerous empty parking stalls An alternative I would like to propose is to expand the police lot toward Yorktown rather than toward Utica I realize that secure fencing will need to be added Another suggestion is that less frequently used vehicles be housed in a city yard on another site such as located on Gothard I hope that whenever possible residential property be given priority and be protected from noise pollution I also hope that any and all green areas be saved when other alternatives exist Thank you all for your hard work and dedication I know your Job is never easy I would appreciate your consideration in this matter I hope you will agree with me that the existing green belt should stay as is and that this is the best thing for the entire neighborhood It is also my hope that you will explore other possible alternatives I would appreciate any feedback you could provide If there is any way that I can assist you please let me know Si ely K h a d Joyce Holmes 1911 Park Street (714) 536 -4728 RECEIVE ® ( August 20 2000 AUG Z Z 2000 Department of Planning Dear Members of the Planning Commission, My wife and I write this letter regarding the second expansion of the police parking facility on Main Street We are not in favor of this second expansion and hope this Commission votes against the expansion We reside at 1907 Park Street In the ten years we have lived at this address this proposed project will be the second setback for us as residents on Park Street This proposed project will affect all of us physically emotionally aesthetically and financially It is not fair appropriate or considerate for us to be taken advantage of twice since these homes were built in such a short period of time It should be noted we have made verbal and written complaints about the light and noise problems originating from the traffic to and from the police parking area With the expansion of the parking facilities these problems can only get worse and it would be unfortunate that the Commission would take steps to only enhance these problems rather than minimize them In an effort to be part of the solution rather than only complainers my wife and I offer some thoughts for alternatives 1 more parking added along Lake Street 2 additional parking should be considered at the City parking facility on Gotherd_ 3 utilize more parking on Yorktown by the City garage and Huntington Beach High School 4 Reconfigure existing parking where secondary vehicles can be parked elsewhere We propose and would support reallocation of the funds for this project to a project of greater need(i e police enforcement) The home owners on Park Street should not be taken advantaged of again by City government We support our Police Department and their needs when called upon to do so Fiscally sound projects and proposals have been supported by us and our neighbors We have all talked favorably about our Police Department to friends both in the City as well as other cities I know that should this project to expand the police parking lot be approved,we all would be very disappointed and feel that our City government and police have let us down We all need to be good neighbors-both the City government to the residents as well as the residents to City government Isn t it time that the government listened to us Dear members let us keep City Hall visually appealing The green-black fencing at the comer of Yorktown and Lake Streets is awful Why not improve that comer and place a parking area there with beautiful landscaping to disguise the parking. Form and beauty needs a greater standing in our City Especially near City Hall,we need to preserve the sense of a landscaped-monument" Please consider this thoughtfully The green,landscaped area of grass and majestic mature trees is the last"monument" of nature that the City Hall area has left In conclusion,please do not move forward on this parking lot expansion Once paved,it will never ever go back to the"green monument we have now Vote NO and consider another alternative The City of Huntington Beach as well as the residents of Park Street do not deserve a double lint by a second expansion of the same area that was miscalculated and misjudged a few years ago I Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter and the chance to voice my opinion I trust all of you will vote courageously thoughtfully and with"HEART" not Just your head_ Thoughtfully yours Frank Yee 1907 Park Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO CET INVOLVED► Please drop off or mail the attached letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name Address4to�t- V j C' 4 w � n �� CXnp oo -- 39 THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO GET INVOLVED? Please drop off or mail the attached letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name Address 1401 92� z ✓] r f t CAP 00 � 39 THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO GET INVOLVED► Please drop off or mail the attached letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name,,,&A1z/,//7 4111vt4 Address _111� C1 ed � -4 �, __ w_CDr- _n -r Z c� s CIF ORoo - 31 f t August 28, 2000 Dear Council Member Shirley Dettlof, We are Huntington Beach residents concerned about a recent decision made by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission Early in August, we were notified that the Huntington Beach Police Department had applied for a permit to expand their current parking lot In our attached letters you will see a list of concerns regarding the negative impact this project would have on our property and the surrounding neighborhood As outlined in our letters, we have attempted to be proactive by offering altematities to the proposed plan 4s this matter was decided rather quickly, we feel we were not given adequate time to be a part of the decision making process We would like the opportunity to meet and explore more positive solutions to the proposed permanent alteration of our neighborhood Due to the excessive appeal fee, we are requesting that you, our Council Representatives, appeal on our behalf, so that mutually beneficial options could be further explored Examples of possible savings include a) Reassignment of the existing parking lot using 45 existing parking slots on Lake St/Main St for city vehicles This willl increase police spaces on Main St b) Reduce the size of the new proposed parking from 90 to 45 parking slots reducing all costs c) Postponement of this project for actual installation costs, contingencies, and over-rides Please give us an opportunity to be heard Thank you for your continued commitment and service to the residents of Huntington Beach Sincerely yours, Keith, Joyce & Cantlm Holmes MaryAnn Kielb Frank & Darleen Yee Jeff Owens 0 THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO GET INVOLVEDT Please drop off or mail the attached letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members �O �,t,•�lib�.—�t Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Parr" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name ��N � 1 ��� �N CST Address /N �-jj Z6 2 7 2-5 City of Huntington Beach Mayor and City Council It is my understanding that the city of Huntington Beach intends to expand the existing police parking lot by an additional ninety spaces The proposed location for the expansion is situated on the northeast comer of Main Street and Utica Avenue Currently, the property is attractively landscaped with a large grassy area and several trees In 1998, I purchased the residence at 1905 Park Street,where I currently reside The rear deck of my residence faces west, toward the proposed location of the parking lot expansion project The view of the trees and green belt area was a consideration in my purchase of this residence Replacing this attractively landscaped area with a parkmg lot will negatively impact the view from my deck and the property value of my residence I am also very concerned with the noise associated with a police parking lot, which will be utilized twenty-four hours a day I understand that this property is owned by the city and may be used for purposes deemed appropriate by city officials I am asking, however, that the mayor and city council members postpone the project long enough to consider other options, which may include -Reducing the size of the proposed expansion by 50% and maintaining the present landscaping throughout the remainder of the property -Relocating the project to another area If these options are not viable, I implore members of the city council to carefully consider constructing the proposed parking facility in such a way that it impacts local residents as little as possible The facility should be designed to guard the surrounding homes from the exposure of excessive noise and should be as aesthetically pleasing as a parking lot can be Thank for your consideration, Je wens (714) 960-8518 1905 Park Street Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 I �s a THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO GET INVOLVED - t.3 Please drop off or mail the attached letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members �2CCZ) MA014 s'F Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name Address c GQ/LQ� (�� Cep No 00 3� Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name P &J Address /fQ N C"- C G r^ "5 = "l v C\Av Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name �J� Address l.t(P W\ } K) S Cap C-� �' G G 't7 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, � ;� Name Address r � Ni-J ��� 00 --31 Dear Huntington Beach City Council I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current "Green Space Park" and explore alternate solutions Sincerely, Name Address 921 Pr5 GA �Z(� ti G7 C7 Ca ri s y [ Gv&P No Oa — 39 J Ai Z � -� ,4- t OCT 1b 00 15 10 HB CHHMBER OFxCOMH 714 9bO-7654 P 1 I I October 16,2000 Dear Hunitngton Beach City Council i I oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police department parking lot at the corner of Main Street and Utica Ave I encourage the council to reconsider the destruction of the current"Green Space Park" I support the building of a permanent parking structure at the Civic Center This was pronuscd in 1992 More parking spaces are needed now as well as in the future for employees and visitors to the Civic Center Sincerely, Ann Minnie 1747 Park St Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 714-536-6809 o — Ell l C'+ 0 �r I 7 J > I I D - I VlLe- y 1 { � I 1� �L J PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS County of Orange ) NOTICE OF AMENDMENT NO ON FILE A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING 99 3/LOCAL COASTAL proposed request is on I am a Citizen of the United States and a BEFORE THE PROGRAM AMEND file in the City Clerks Of MENT NO 00 2 face 2000 Main Street CITY COUNCIL OF DOWNTOWN PARK Huntington Beach Cali resident of the County aforesaid, I am THE CITY OF ING MASTER PLAN forma 92648 for inspec HUNTINGTON UPDATE) Applicant tion by the public A copy over the age of eighteen years, and not a BEACH City of Huntington of the staff report will be NOTICE IS HEREBY Beach Request To available to interested party to or interested in the below GIVEN that on Monday amend Section 4214 of parties at the City October 16 2000 at the Dohntown Specific Clerks Office after Octo entitled matter I am a principal clerk of 700 PM in the City Plan updating the Down ber_12 2000 ALL INTERESTED 2000 M the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT a council Chambers town Parking Master PERSONS are invited to ain Street Hunt Plan The update con ington Beach the City sists of recommend attend said hearing and newspaper of general circulation printed Council will hold a public ahons to consolidate the express opinions or hearing on the following two designated areas submit evidence for or and published in the City of Huntington planning and zoning within the master plan against the application items revisions to the parking as outlined above If you Beach County1 APPEAL OF THE ratios and requirements challenge the City Coun of Orange, State of PLANNING COM and increase of the cils action in court you MISSION S APPROVAL overall development may be limited to raising California, and that attached Notice is a OF CONDITIONAL USE cap Location Down only those issues you or PERMIT NO 0039 town Specific Plan area someone els- raised at true and complete copy as was printed (POLICE DEPART generally bounded by the public hearing de MENT PARKING LOT Facific Coast Highway scribed in this notice or and published in the Huntington Beach EXPANSION) Ap Sixth Street Acacia Av in — written cor pellant Tom Harman enue and Second respondence delivered and Fountain Valley issues of said Mayor Pro Tern Appli Street Project Planner to the City at or prior to cant City of Huntington Wayne Carvalho the public hearing If Beach 2000 Mar 4 ZONING TEXT there are any further newspaper to wit the issue(s) of Street Request Appeal AMENDMENT NO questions please call the of the Planning Com 93 5/LOCAL COASTAL ---- missions decision to ap• PROGRAM AMEND prove the expansion of MENT NO 98 2A Planning Division at the existing 108 space (CARTS AND KIOSK) 536 5271 and refer to secured Police Depart Applicant City of Hunt the above items Direct ment parking lot by add ington Beach Request your written communica ing 90 secured parking To amend the Hunt tions to the City Clerk October 5 , 2000 spaces for a total of 198 ington Beach Zoning Connie Brockway parking spaces Loca and Subdivision Or City Clerk lion 2000 Main Street dinance and the Down City of (City Hall northeast cor town Specific Plan by Huntington Beach ner of Main Street and modifying the existing 2000 Main Street Utica Avenue)—Assigned Carts and Kiosks Or 2nd Floor Planner Amy Wolfe durance to incorporate Huntington Beach I declare, under penalty of perjury, that 2 APPEAL OF THE modifications suggested California 92648 714 536-5227 PLANNING COM by the Coastal Com Published Huntin on _.... the foregoing is true and correct MISSIONS DENIAL OF mission The amend Beach Fountain Valle (CONDITIONAL USE ment also includes other Independent October 5 PERMIT NO 99 77 miscellaneous mod 2000 (OCEAN ROOM AT PE ifications Location TER S LANDING) Ap Citywide Project Plan 101 029 Executed on pellant GTN Industries ner Ricky Ramos (�[�tober 500 PO Box 100 Sunset 1 NOTICE IS Beach CA 90742 Appli HEREBY GIVEN that at Costa Mesa, California cant Michael Cho for Item(s) #1 and #2 are r GTN Industries 3991 categorically exempt MacArthur Blvd Ste from_the provisions of #350 Newport Beach the California CA 92660 Request Environmental Quality Appeal of the Planning Act Commissions decision 2 NOTICE IS to deny the establish HEREBY GIVEN that ment of a banquet/res Item(s)#3 is covered un taurant facility with live der Statutory Exemp entertainment and alco tion Section 15262 of hol sales in an existing the California two story (12 746 sq ft) Environmental Quality ignature budding at Peters Land Act (CE NO ing commercial center 3 NOTICE IS Location 16360 Pacific HEREBY GIVEN that Coast Highway (east Item#4 is covered under side of Pacific Coastj Negative Declaration Highway south of N t) A o 93 20 adopted by Anderson Street) f the City Council on May signed r Planner Amy 4 1994 Wolfe 3 ZONING TEXT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH JJ INTER DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO Connie Brockway City Clerk FROM Amy Wolfe Associate Planner SUBJECT Conditional Use Permit No 00 39 (Police Department Parking Lot Expansion) DATE September 29, 2000 Please be advised that the Planning Department (Ferme Shy) generated the 300 ft mailing radius labels for the Police Department Parking Lot Expansion (Conditional Use Permit No 00-39) utilizing the August 2000, County Assessment rolls data ANiyWe Planner i i I CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST SUBJECT G_la p 00'S!q l/AP?em--roF 1pfl p.S ►u-t ��'� E*cQf�N4►OI DE P TMENT Q LA 1�3 V13 10 MEETING DATE CONTACT - 'AM L'I O t PHONE IA YES NO ( ) ) ( ) Is the notice attached? Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council(and/or Redevelopment Agency)heanng'7 Are the date,day and time of the public hearing correct? / Y { ) ( ) If an appeal,is the appeicant's name included in the notice? f ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Perrrut,does the notice include appeal language? ( ) QV Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Councd? / I ( ) ( ) Is a map attached for publication? ( ) ( ) AQ Is a larger ad required? Size ( ( ) ( ) Is the venfication statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? CGk-A I(+ode t-' /i Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? Are the appe1int's name and address part of the marling labels? If Coastal Development Permit,is the Coastal Comrrussion part of the maRing j� labels? i ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Perrrnt,are the resident labels attached? I ( ) ( ) Is the Report 33433 attached? (Economic Development Dept,items only) . I Pleas complete the following- 1 Minimum days from publication to hearing date 2 Number of tunes to be published 3 Number of days between publications Jzv 21 _- I O 710 i MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 DEPARTMENT SUBJECT REQUESTING Planning Appeal of Police Department Parking Lot Expansion Public-Works __ Undergroun I ity District approved for public hearing a meeting) TODAY'S DATE September 26, 2000 VERIFIED BY ADMININSTRATION APPROVED BY Ray Silver City Administrator 9/26/00 3 14 PM 1 � Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 z x uA Te-`?., ING, CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH O .�o■ro.,,, http//www cI huntmgton beach ca us P O BOX 190 2000 MAIN STREET v` y HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 Z LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING fJ� Ov—�� �t�a� c.vt�>✓ 1111111I11111111 fill 111111111I111111111111111111111111If[IIIII NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday October 16 2000, at 7 00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items X 1 APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMIIISSION'S APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (POLICE DEPARTMENT PARKING LOT EXPANSION) Appellant Tom Harman Mayor Pro Tem Applicant City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Request Appeal of the Planning Commission s decision to approve the expansion of the existing 108-space secured Police Department parking lot by adding 90 secured parking spaces for a total of 198 parking spaces Location 2000 Main Street (City Hall northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue) Assigned Planner Amy Wolfe [] 2 APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 99-77 (OCEAN ROOM AT PETER'S LANDING) Appellant GTN Industries P O Box 100 Sunset Beach CA 90742 Applicant Michael Cho for GTN Industries, 3991 MacArthur Blvd Ste 9350, Newport Beach CA 92660 Request Appeal of the Planning Commission s decision to deny the establishment of a banquet/restaurant facility with live entertainment and alcohol sales in an existing two- story (12 746 sq ft) building at Peters Landing commercial center Location 16360 Pacific Coast Highway (east side of Pacific Coast Highway, south of Anderson Street) Assigned Planner Amy Wolfe ❑ 3 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO 99-3/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO 00-2 (DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN UPDATE) Applicant City of Huntington Beach Request To amend Section 4 2 14 of the Downtown Specific Plan updating the Downtown Parking Master Plan The update consists of recommendations to consolidate the two designated areas within the master plan revisions to the parking ratios and requirements, and increase of the overall development cap Location Downtown Specific Plan—area generally bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Sixth Street, Acacia Avenue, and Second Street Project Planner Wayne Carvalho ❑ 4 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO 93-5/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO 98-2A(CARTS AND KIOSK) Applicant City of Huntington Beach Request To amend the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and the Downtown Specific Plan by modifying the existing Carts and Kiosks Ordinance to incorporate modifications suggested by the Coastal Commission The amendment also includes other miscellaneous modifications Location Citywide Project Planner Ricky Ramos �0Vq, I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item(s) #1 and 92 are categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act 2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item(s)43 is covered under Statutory Exemption Section 15262 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) 3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #4 is covered under Negative Declaration No 93 20 adopted by the City Council on May 4 1994 ON FILE A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach California 92648 for inspection by the public A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after October 12, 2000 ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above If you challenge the City Council s action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above items Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 Cop Oa 39, F�bL10E ?A e r—t 1�3vn W7 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST B E K Q A t,)S k O k) MAILING LABELS-September 21 2000 C CC- A f f E A lam) President 1 Huntington Harbor P 10 FANS 16 H B Chamber of Commerce P O Box 791 John Miles 2100 Main Street Suite 200 Sunset B CA 90742 19425 Castl od Circle Huntington Beach CA 92648 Hunti on Beach CA 92648 Judy Legan 2 William D Holman 11 Sue Johnson 16 Orange County Assoc of Realtors PLC 19671 Quiet ane 25552 La Paz Road 19 Corporate Plaza Drive Hu bon Beach CA 92648 Laguna Hills CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660 7912 President 3 Mr Tom Zanic 12 Edna Littlebury 17 Amigos De Bolsa C New Urban West Gldn St Mob Hm Owners Leag 16531 Bolsa a Street Suite 312 520 Broadway Ste 100 11021 Magnolia Blvd Hunti n Beach CA 92646 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Garden Grove CA 92642 Sunset Beach Community As Pres H B Hist Society 13 Pacific Coast Archaeological 18 Pat Thies President C/O Newland House Museum Society Inc PO Box 215 19820 Beach Blvd P O Box 10926 Sunset Be CA 90742 0215 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Costa Mesa CA 92627 Attn Jane Gothold President 5 Community Services Dept 14 County of Orange/EMA 19 Huntington Beach Tomorrow Chairperson Michael M Ruane Dir PO Box 865 Historical Resources Bd P O Box 4048 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Santa Ana CA 92702-4048 Julie Vandermost 6 Council on Aging 15 County of Orange/EMA 19 BIA OC 1706 Orange Ave Thomas Mathews 9 Executive c e#100 Huntington c CA 92648 P O Box 4048 Irvi 92714-6734 Santa Ana CA 92702-4048 Richard Spicer 7 Jeff Metzel 16 Planning Department 19 SCAG { Seacliff HOA Orange County EMA 818 Wes 12th Floor 19391 Sha arbor Circle P O Box 4048 Los geles CA 90017 H gton Beach CA 92648 Santa Ana CA 92702448 E T I Corral 100 8 John Roe 16 County of Orange/EMA 19 Mary Bell Seacliff HOA Tim Miller 20 astwood Cir 19382 Surfdal P O Box 4048 untington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Santa Ana CA 92702-4048 Frank Caponi 9 Lou Mannone 16 Planning Dir 20 Environmental Board Chairman Seacliff HOA City of Costa Mesa 6662 Glen Dnve 1982r Bluff Circle P O Box 1200 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Costa Mesa CA 92628 1200 G\RAMONA\LABELS\PHLBL 092100 DOC Cup oo-37 937 16-530 937 16-531 937 16-532 JOSEPH &REBECA MENESES MICHAEL GALANOS GEORGE A.&JANICE 0 WOODLEY 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#707 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#708 17051 MARINA BAY DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2817 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2817 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649-2917 937 16-533 937 16-534 937 16-535 SCOTT D STERNBERG EDWARD J KNIGHT MELODY JANE GUIVER 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#802 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#803 8802 LUSS DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2849 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2849 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 2230 937 16 537 937 16-538 937 16-539 OLD TOWN INC KENNETH ATHERTON MARY K.HAYNES 12132 TOPAZ CIR 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#807 263 CHESTERFIELD GARDEN GROVE CA 92845-1831 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2849 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660-4223 937 16-540 937 16-541 937 16-542 ILENE S GREEN GREEN TRUST 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#901 6012 POINT LOMA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2860 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647-6116 ZX3t", 93716-544 93716-545 WILLIAM J &VANESSA E CORREIA I GAYLE E GLENN 4191 PIERSON DR 13829 CHERRY AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 3050 CHINO CA 91710-7405 I 937 16-546 937 16-547 937 16-548 ANTHONY RAPTIS KEVIN D BOROFF VALENCIA L.DENNIS 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#907 40 VIA DI NOLA 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#1001 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2860 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 9008 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 937 16-549 937-16-550 937 16-551 JOHN PIEKARSKI NORIKO YOSHIOKA DEBORAH K.MOUSSAFIR 7585 OCEAN POINT LN 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#1003 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#1004 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6067 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 937 16-552 937-16-553 937 16-554 (TR) REYNOLDS KAREN LYNN STEES BEN R &JUDY WOLF 1846 KINGLET CT 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#1006 4214 PASEO DE PLATA COSTA MESA CA 92626-4840 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 CYPRESS CA 90630-3428 937 16-555 43 ROSTI Q4A 2323I-iUNTINGTON ST#1008 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 t I Gv p oo -��' 937 16-499 937 16-501 937 16-502 RICHARD J WINKLE ANTHONY JAMES KUBIS DOUGLAS P WHITNEY 115 IRVINE COVE COURT 9332 VELARDO DR 215 WICHITA AVE LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 1040 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-2315 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-280C 937 16-503 937 16-504 937 16-505 LINDA R OGAN TURNER CLEO R TR OF H CARL EDMUND BALL 215 WICHITA AVE#405 215 WICHITA AVE#406 3615 WALNUT AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 LONG BEACH CA 90807-4309 937 16-506 937 16-507 93716508 ALEXANDER KHURGEL GARY &DALLAS DAY JEANNIE DIMALANTA 215 WICHITA AVE#408 215 WICHITA AVE#409 215 WICHITA AVE#501 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-287< 937 16-509 937 16-510 937 16-511 SANGEETA RANI GUPTA ROSA MAHIN ROBERT A DUNN 215 WICHITA AVE#502 215 WICHITA AVE#503 215 WICHITA AVE#504 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-287 937-16-512 937 16 513 937 16-514 ERNEST M &NANCY A.GOLDBERG GEORGE A.&JANICE O WOODLEY WAN C HO 20171 BIG BEND LN 17051 MARINA BAY DR 18863 JEFFREY AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4813 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 2917 CERRITOS CA 90703-6177 937 16-515 937 16 516 937 16-517 CHART ASSAWAPIMONPORN JENNIFER A.LEICHT CHRISTOPHER CATTLE 215 WICHITA AVE#508 215 WICHITA AVE#601 PO BOX 61 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-006 i 937 16-518 937 16 519 937 16 520 FRANK M &GLORIA M J FIORILLO JAMES SIMMONS CLIFFORD W GILLESPIE 17741 FALKIRK LN 215 WICHITA AVE#604 215 WICHITA AVE#605 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649-4812 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-287 937-16-521 937 16 522 937 16 523 I NANETTE MARKHAM NESTOR VARGAS JEFFREY ALAN PAGE 215 WICHITA AVE#606 215 WICHITA AVE#607 215 WICHITA AVE#608 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2879 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-287 937 1&524 937 16 525 937 16 526 DOLORES M DWYER CHESTER E.&NANCY H MURCH DEBRA SUSAN RICE 20601 SUBURBIA LN 159 ORANGE PARK 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#703 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 5451 REDLANDS CA 92374-5543 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-281 I 937 16-527 937 16 528 937 16 529 ANNA YAMAUCHI JOAN ELLIOTT JOSHUAA.CARR 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#704 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#705 15211 NEWCASTLE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2817 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2817 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 263 CvP Oa -37 9371S439 937 15-440 937 15-441 WIL M T TIEHEN JOHN &LAUREN OTT RAYMOND J &SHARON S PARRISH 7412SEkBLUFF DR#107 7412 SEABLUFF DR#108 7412 SEABLUFF DR#109 HUNTNGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648.6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 93715-442 937 15-443 937 15-444 CHARLES B SMITH RALPH J &ANN K.KAJDASZ MARGOT M HUME 7412 SEABLUFF DR#110 7412 SEABLUFF DR#111 7412 SEABLUFF DR#112 HUNTOGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 93716475 937 16-476 937 16477 Nl*&&ASHIMA MEHTA LAURA R YARNS JOEL WOOLDRIDGE 215 WY}iITA AVE 10L 215 WICHITA AVE#102 215 WICHITA AVE#103 HUNTXGTON BEACH CA 92648-2800 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 93716478 937 16-479 937 16480 IRVVWIL KANODE DIANA KUKA JOHN F &SUE ANN MILLER 17382ALTA VISTA CIR 215 WICHITA AVE#105 1030 13TH ST HUNTNGTON BEACH CA 92647-6130 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2712 937-1 481 937 16-482 937 16-483 KEVIN PHAM SANDRA H NOBLE RICHARD NELSON 215 WCHITA AVE#107 215 WICHITA AVE#108 215 WICHITA AVE#201 HUNTr9IGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 937"484 937 16-485 937 16-486 i i SUSANA.MCCLARIN FRED E MARQUEZ KATHLEEN HARRIS 215 WICHITA AVE#202 215 WICHITA AVE#203 4362 FLOWERIDALE CT HUNTOGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 LAS VEGAS NV 89103-4222 93716487 937 16-488 937 16489 FRANKJ VITONIS DAWN ARNOLD CRAIG B CARSTENS 215 WICHITA AVE#205 PO BOX 24042 215WICHITAAVE#207 HUNTOGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 INDIANAPOLIS IN 46224-0042 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 93716490 937 16-491 937 16-492 BETTYS HAYASHI HANS J &CHRISTA BOEDEKER CYNTHIA ALYCE&RICHARD G AINSLIE 215WMITAAVE#208 10491 COWAN HEIGHTS DR 3000 COUNTRY CLUB DR HUNTMTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 SANTA ANA CA 92705-1556 GLENDALE CA 91208-1712 93716493 937 16-494 937 16-495 CHARLES E.ELLIS LINDA MASTERTON ROBIN J CLARK 4939 BNOWNDEER LN 215 WICHITA AVE#304 215 WICHITA AVE#305 RANCFD PALOS VERDES CA 90275-3917 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 i 93716496 937 16-497 937 16-498 KEITHP-HOPKINS JOHN M GRAEFF HOWARD JAY&MIR)C FRANTZ 215 WICHITA AVE#306 215 WICHITA AVE#307 31 WHITEWOOD WAY HUNTMTON BEACH CA 92648-2878 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2878 IRVINE CA 92612 2722 I v COpoo -39' 023 041-03 023-041-04 023-041-06 CITY OF TINGTON BEACH C MC IMPRO CITY OF HUNTING BEACH C IVIC IMPRO CITY OF HUNTI ON BEACH 2000 N ST 2000 MAI 2000 H TINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2702 HUNVNGTON BEACH CA 92648-2702 HUNTiNGTON BEACH CA 92648-2702 023-041-07 937 15-413 937 15-414 HAROLD E.SHINN THOMAS L&LINDA M SMITH SCOTT &SUSAN L MARANTZ 7371 SEABLUFF DR#101 7371 SEABLUFF DR#102 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 937 15-415 937 15-416 937 15-417 ROBERT J &JUDITH A.GUIDOTTI FREYMANN RONALD&JANET I VON KIYOSHI &MASAKO TERASHIMA 7371 SEABLUFF DR#103 7540 58TH AVE NE 7371 SEABLUFF DR#105 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 OLYMPIA WA 98516 9305 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-643 937 15-418 937 15-419 93715420 JAMES R &ANTOINETTE A.REED JOE E ROBERTSON AARON COWEN 7371 SEABLUFF DR#106 7371 SEABLUFF DR#107 7371 SEABLUFF DR#108 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 937 15-421 937 15-422 937 15-423 I DONALD M &ANITA S L ZIMMERMAN KATHERINE O KLEIN HOWARD M WARNER 7371 SEABLUFF DR#109 7371 SEABLUFF DR#110 7371 SEABLUFF DR#111 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-643 _ I 937 15-424 937 15-425 937 15-426 STEVEN H &JOAN W PURDUE GLENDA M LEE HARBIN PAULINE M TRUST 7371 SEABLUFF DR#112 19501 RANCH LN#101 19501 RANCH LN#102 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6435 + HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-643 I 937 15-427 937 15428 937 15-429 GLADYS L GRISWOLD WILLIAM A.&AILEEN E REID CHESTER G DONALDSON 19501 RANCH LN#103 19501 RANCH LN#104 19501 RANCH LN#105 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6435 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6435 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-643 937 15430 937 15-431 937 15- 32 NANCY L TREISTER YASH P &SHASHI SUBBERWAL JAN WALLACE&MARGARET MICHA 19501 RANCH LN#106 19501 RANCH LN#107 W�1 RANCH LN#108 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-0435 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6435 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-643 937 15-433 937 15-434 937 15-435 RICAHRD J &MAUREEN K.MC DONALD STEPHEN K.PERZIGAN 7412 SEABLUFF DR#101 7412 SEABLUFF DR#102 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 6tg -� 937 15-436 937 15-437 937 15-438 JOSEPH &CAROL E TARTAGLINI PEGGY KOHL GILBERT CARRASCO 7412 SEABLUFF DR#104 7412 SEABLUFF DR#105 7412 SEABLUFF DR#106 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92643 643 President Judy Legan HB Chamber of Commerce Orange County Assoc of Realtors 2100 Main St Suite 200 25552 La Paz Rd Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Laguna Hills Ca 92653 William D Holman Mr Tom Zanic Edna Littlebury PLC _ New Urban West Gldn St Mob Hm Owners League 23 Corporate Plaza Suite 250 520 Broadway Suite 100 11021 Magnolia Blvd Newport Beach Ca 92660 7912 Santa Monica Ca 90401 Garden Grove Ca 92642 President HB Hist Society President HB Tomorrow Richard Spicer—SCAG C/o Newland House Museum PO Box 865 818 West 7'' 12'Floor 19820 beach Blvd Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Los Angeles Ca 90017 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Community Services Dept John Scandura City of Huntington Beach Chairperson Environmental Board Chairman Dept of Public Works histoncal Resources Board 17492 Valeworth Circle 2000 Main St Huntington Beach Ca 9264 9 Huntmgton Beach Ca 9264 8 OZ3 061 42 023 062 01 023 062 02 J ine Rothrock Dennis Niccole Walter Van Deusen 1342 Park St 400 3 d St 1841 Park St Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntmgton Beach Ca 9264 8 o23 062 03 023 062 04 023 062-12 Will Fowler Robert Tarzian Sr Bobby Rank b622 Bar Harbor Ln 1833 Park St 1832 Mam St h,intington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntmgton Beach Ca 9264 8 023 062 29 023 062 3133 023 062-32 David Frampton John Peterson Larry Taylor 1834 Main St 1808 IT'St 1846 Main St Huntmgton Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 937 154 26 937 154 35 937 164-75 Celeste Post Joan VanAlst Nikhil Meta 3421 Wexford#1 7412 Seabluff9103 13528 La Sierra Las Vegas Nv 89129 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Chino Hills Ca 91709 023-031-35 023-061-19 023-061-22 Arthur & Darlene Hornbeck George & Susan Abbond Roger Horner 1925 Park St 1848 Park St 1836 Park St Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 023-061-32 California Coastal Commission Sandra Peterson Robert Waschkeit Theresa Henry 1808 17th St 315 W Utica 200 Oceangate, loth Floor Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Long Beach, Ca 92802-4302 t ggs John Thomas Margaret Riggs 1937 Pine St 1824 Park rrigton �ch, 8 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Cop oa -39 Qj7 164 83 937 165 00 937 16-,) 22 Charles Williams Jeffrey Blesener David Tsong -,690 Homes Ave 21152 Shaw Ln 20381 Crauner Ln Nuevo Ca 92567 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 6 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 9-)7 165 25 9-)7 165 36 937 165 39 Chester Murch Timothy Bridger Mary Haynes 1630 Marion Rd 2323 Huntington St 980.) 2405 Vista Nubleza Redlands Ca 92374 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Newport Beach Ca 92660 9-)7 165 41 023 044 06 023 043 31 Robert Warne Gary Eichman Michael Elsesser 1630 Marion Rd 1927 Pme St 1948 Pule St Redlands Ca 92374 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 023 043 30 023 041 07 023 062 05 Joan Gjanatasio Pacific Coast Homes Carolyn Lacy 1946 Pine St PO Box 285 3013 S Thornton St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Houston Tx 7701 Santa Ana Ca 92704 023 020 03 05 09 023 044 0" 023 044 04 HB Union High School District Tho st Thomas& Suzanne Valker 1025 York-town Ave 1937 P e 1935 Pme St Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 Huntin on Beach Ca 9264 8 2762 Huntington Beach Ca 9264 8 276 023 044 06 023 044 07 023 044 09 Gary Etchman Carl&Eleanor Holmes Pam Julien 1927 Pine St 1925 Pine St 1917 Pine St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 044 10 025 023 17 025 023-21 Joan Arakawa John Betts James Dixon 1915 Pine St 11330 198'h Ave SE 18556 Vallarta Dr Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Issaquah Wa 98027 Huntington Beach Ca 92646 023 044 02 023 044 05 023 044 08 Joan Goetz Gary Hansen Stanley Johnson 1941 Pine St 1931 Pme St 1921 Pme St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 044 11 1 023 010 06 18 24 25 023 042 02 Mark Langer PLC Paul&Carol Warg 1911 Pine St 23 Corporate Plaza Dr;2.)0 1952 Lake ST Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Newport Beach Ca 92660 7944 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 042 03 023 042 04 023 042 05 Winthrop Davenport Weinfeld Trust Douglas&Hoc Tran Michelson 1948 Lake St 1946 Lake St 1942 Lake St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 GLJF 00 -39 U23 042 06 023 043 01 023 043 02 Kevin&Jennifer Vu Randall W Lyford Antonio& Haydee Enriquez 1938 Lake St 1951 Lake St 2130 Main St# 120 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntmgton Beach Ca 92648 023 043 03 023 043 04 023 043 05 Charles Ramey Bent& Henni Christensen Michael O Brien 1945 Lake St 1941 Lake St 1937 Lake St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 046 06 023 043 07 023 043 06 Philip McBride F Stephen Holm Ronald& Pam Poonsaegnsathit 1935 Lake St 1931 Lake St 1932 Pine St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntmgton Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 043-27 023 048 28 023 043 29 Carl&Patricia Convery Glover Victor&Lon Vance Harry& Trudee Joe 1936 Pine St 1938 Pine St 1942 Pine St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 043 30 023 043 31 023 043 32 Joan Gianatasio Michael Elsesser Lorraine Bennet 2D411 Cabot Rd#114 1948 Pine St 1952 Pme St Laguna Hills Ca 92653 5517 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 044 01 023 031 18 023 031 19 James&Gayle Wright Lawerence&Elvira Hutchens Roy L Kung 1948 Park St 1932 Park St 1928 Park St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 031-20 023 031 21 023 031 22 Juliette&Roy Cota George Schultz David Christensen 1926 Park St 1922 Park St 1918 Park St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 a Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 031-26 023 031 27 023 031 28 Allen Shomaker Timothy&Mary Bistolas Renard&Deanna Franklin 1906 Park St 1902 Park St 1901 Park St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntmgton Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 031 29 023 031 30 023 031 31 Jeffrey Owens Franklin Yee Keith Holmes 190.)Park St 1907 Park St 1911 Park St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 031 32 023 031 33 023 031 34 James Thomas Chnstme Bryden Jeffrey McDermaid 1915 Park St 1917 Park St 1921 Park St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648 023 -031 . 2� 0:2.3 -051-:).3 09-3 -001-25 1912 Sfi' 191(o PARK S+ �90g s$RK st I,e" CA 9a��1 4u K f--%>Ih A of t CA- 172AYC tfu►j f4�y �a0 6e" ,CA 92ksid f r i 1 I � e ' 4 I y To the Members of the City Council ?�`} 7{ j 1 LtlIUU S V t ` ! I I am a 10 year resident of Huntington Beach I am a college professor at C�erntosk Colleg'e in Norwalk specializing in the area of landscape design and Ornamental Horticulture My remarks concern the expansion of the parking lot on Main Street and Utica I ask the council to be guided by logic and common sense If my comments sound logical and show common sense, I ask you to reconsider this parking lot expansion and deny construction First in reading the City of H B request for action report under Findings and Approval' Page 11, point 1, the expansion of 108 parking spaces to 198 spaces will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing or detrimental to the value of property and improvements in the neighborhood Tlvs beginning comment in the report is unsubstantiated According to respected real estate professionals who specialize in Huntington Beach properties all properties adjacent close or in view of this site will surer loss of property value Secondly the report does not show that there has been a lighting and sound impact study conducted It is interesting to note on D-1 5 it does say there will be in increase in NOISE It would be appropriate to have an impact study conducted to determine just how much NOISE and how much LIGHTING problems there will be and of what nature The residents deserve to have this information as well as the council The last expansion in 1992 did impact the residents negatively on Park Street To do this again to them in less than 10 years does everyone a dis-service If this council remembers at that time the residents complained to this council as well as the police department about the noise from the existing parking lot Now to expand the lot would be adding insult to injury Thirdly the report shows an initial cost of$390K with a permanent wall to be constructed in 2 years I believe the Council needs to know these additional costs expected in 2 years could be $150K - $200K A 10-foot high block wall will need sigmficant engineering and construction to pass Federal/State earthquake Public Works Standards To demo the chain link fence and rebuild will be $160K I ask that the Council be sure of ALL the TOTAL costs I propose reconfiguration of the existing parking lot by moving some signs city vehicle parking closer to the unused part of the parking lot close to Lake Street We will use more efficiently what we already have and save some funds The money spent on this project ($360K+) when our City Police Department members are seeking a fair wage increase and a preservation of family benefits does not make any good sense To give these people a parking space in lieu of a fair wage and keeping benefits is not good logic LAT!;� DN4M�> >- _ 2 The $390K expenditure at this time in the city where in priorities the infrastructure and the streets all need desperate attention Let s use good logic and common sense The notion that a 10 foot block wall at earthquake standards could ever look architecturally appropriate to the style of City Hall is foolishness Thank you, Frank Yee 1907 Park St Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �a` / .�-R E t T 1 November 6, 2000 Mayor and Members of the Huntington Beach City Council At the October 16, 2000 City Council meeting, agenda item D-1 regarding the expansion of the Huntington Beach Police parking was postponed until the November 6 2000 meeting due to a conflict of interest question for some of the members of the council due to the location of their homes/businesses to the proposed site I was one of the many Huntington Beach residents who attended the Oct 16th meeting to speak in protest of this proposed construction Unfortunately the issue was postponed and we (the residents) were not allowed to speak After sitting through this meeting from 6 45pm until 10 30pm when this agenda item was presented, I was dismayed and concerned with the members of the council who, knowing this issue was on the agenda, did not prepare themselves prior to the meeting to even ask the question of whether or not they had any conflict In addition the City of Huntington Beach employs a City Attorney whose responsibilities is to protect our city and advise the council members on these matters There were many residents who attended this meeting for the purpose of representing a position against the expansion of the police parking Some of these people had to take time off of work to be there only to be turned away and in essence be told they had to take more time off if they were to address the council Something needs to be done about his system Speaking for myself, I planned to attend tonight s meeting and hopefully be allowed to express my concern and issues regarding the expansion However I am down with a severe case of the flu I am however, attaching a letter of my concerns which I would respectfully ask the council to consider Other residents have sent letters expressing their concerns and proposing other solutions and I ask that the Council consider these At the very least, please postpone the decision until a sound and lighting study can be conducted by an independent consultant Thank you for your consideration Darleen Yee 1907 Park Street Huntington Beach, CA LJN-T"C-,- c-om M D - 2- Mr Mayor and Members of the City Council r I am a resident of H B whose property is adjacent to the proposed parking expansion and will be adversely affected The affect that will be imposed on myself and neighbors is a significant decrease in property value as expressed by various real estate professionals specializing in the H B area The views from my home will change from a green park with beautiful trees to a chain-linked enclosed paved parking lot This proposed paving of the park area is unfair to those of us who bought our homes in good faith that this would remain a beautiful park area It was not disclosed to any of us that there was any other proposed use of this area when we purchased our new homes in 1990 In fact some of the lots commanded a premium due to the view overlooking this beautiful green area Secondly the noise realized as a result of more police vehicles pulling in and out of this proposed parking area will be of great concern As some of you may recall, there were numerous complaints a few years ago from the residents concerning the tremendous noise from the revving of engines, siren testing and inconsiderate officers who chose the driveway behind our houses to hold private conversations not realizing that they could be heard into our homes I can personally attest to the fact that a block wall fence does not in any way elirrunate the noise or lighting effect into our homes It isn t pleasant to sit on my patio trying to enjoy a summer evening and unwind from a long hard day at work only to be rudely interrupted by a most offending conversation between two policemen discussing personal relationships that I had no business, nor did I really want to know about I see only an increase of noise pollution should a parking lot be built in this area In reading the planning report I see no evidence of a lighting or noise impact study being conducted Thirdly to install a chain link fence around this area does not contribute to the beautiful aesthetics of City Hall that we have today The citizens of H B can be proud of the area around City Hall There must be alternatives that can result in a solution to any parking situation for the police department as well as preserve the beauty of the city hall area so the citizens of H B can continue to be proud of our City Hall Lastly I am concerned about the cost to demolish the area and install the proposed parking area It is my understanding that the city has proposed to initially construct this area at the cost of$392 000 with a temporary chain link fence being replaced with a block wall within the next two years If the council would consider alternative parking proposals, the funds designated to this project could be utilized for more immediate desirable projects such as street repair, infrastructure updating and modernization, and beach cleanliness Our beaches command high tourism and without clean beaches, revenue from tourists as well as residents will dinunish I ask this council to preserve the green space we have and deny this parking lot expansion Utilize alternatives such as the minimally used parking area at Yorktown and Lake or reconfigure the existing parking lot to handle more parking required by the police Once this park area is paved over it is gone forever and can not be returned to what it is today I employ the city council tonight to think carefully of the best solution for all of the citizens of H B Thank You Darleen Yee 1907 Park Street Huntington Beach CA 92648 Members of the Huntington Beach City Council t t CA Due to my work schedule, I was unable to attend this meeting and personally convey my feelings regarding the proposed expansion of the police parking facility In lieu of doing so I provided tlus letter to my neighbor Frank and asked that he read it to you if given the opportunity during the public comments portion of the meeting In February 1998, I purchased the residence at 1905 Park Street, where I currently reside The rear deck of my residence faces west toward the proposed location of the parking lot expansion project The view of the trees and green belt area that currently exists there was a consideration in my purchase of this residence Replacing this attractively landscaped area with a parking lot will drastically reduce the aesthetic appearance of the neighborhood making the surrounding homes less desirable and diminishing their market value Aside from these important issues I am very concerned with the noise associated with a police parking lot, which will be utilized on a twenty-four hour basis I view this as a serious quality of life issue for myself and the other local residents I understand that this property is owned by the city and may be used for purposes deemed appropriate by city officials I am asking, however that the mayor and city council members postpone the project long enough to explore other options which my include 1) Reducing the size of the proposed expansion by 50% and maintaining the present landscaping throughout the remainder of the property 2) Relocating the project to another area I hope members of the city council will carefully consider these options If the project must go forward against the wishes of the surrounding property owners, I request that council members ensure that the parking facility be constructed in such a way that it impacts local residents as little as possible The facility should be designed to guard the surrounding homes from the exposure to excessive noise and be properly landscaped with trees and green belt areas so as not to overly mjure the appearance of the neighborhood Thank you for your consideration Jeff Owens 1905 N Park Street Huntington Beach Ca (714) 960-8518 w RECEIVED 06M 'SZ.1 c2 Homes AND MADE A PAST OF THE RECORD AT Tff � _U U COUNCIL MEETING OF OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK November 5 2000 CONNIE gAH iaKWAV,CITY CLERK , I -a• �b l.c " E--(Fa�''Dear Members of the Huntington Beach City Council My name is Joyce Holmes and I reside at 1911 Park Street My neighbors and I are oppose to the police department parking lot expansion at the current proposed location Enclosed is a copy of a petition which lists approximately fifty downtown residents that are against the destruction of the affected green area Several of us came to speak at the last meeting to present our views and to offer alternative plans We waited until 10 00 then were told the public hearing was going to be delayed until Nov 6 2000 We believed a legitimate appeal had been made on our behalf but then were told that this appeal was now in question All we want is a chance to be heard, and an opportunity to work with the city to find a better alternative to the current parlung lot plan Please give us that chance Thank you all for your hard work and dedication to our city Whenever possible please protect our limited green areas and residential property Sincerely, Keith Holmes Joyce Holmes MaryAnn Kielb Frank Yee Darleen Yee PETITION PRESERVATION OF THE "GREEN SPACE PARK" Corner of Main Street and Utica We are Huntington Beach citizens in support of the preservation of the"Green Space Park" located on the corner of Alin Street alld Utica, adjacent to City Hall We oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police parking lot on this site. Name Address Zip Signature Date �a `i{ I�'{`t Lb�l B / ti c t 1�d" Dill II i f m Address i nature Date PETITION PRESERVATION OF THE "GREEN SPACE PARK" Corner of Main Street and Utica We are Huntington Beach citizens in support of the preservation of the"Green Space Park" located on the corner of Main Street and Utica,adjacent to City Hatt We oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police parking lot on this site- Name Address Zip Signature Date _LS2 O _ILL_ gac��l(�--- / 7 a —5 3 v/ ���►z��a�r v _ N_��, a9 9 — - - G�/` � -L LIIZ-�cL— Ad—ALt PETITION PRESERVATION OF THE"GREEN SPACE PARK" Corner of Main Street and Utica We are Huntington Beach citizens in support of the preservation of the"Green Space Park" located on the corner of Main Street and Utica, adjacent to City Hall We oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed,secured police parkung lot on this site. Name Address Z111 Signature Date �- L ��� ►,. I on P�.c�,s -- e-gab y':!r FAJ —4t-- c I i I r ' �')j C.L �weS RECEIVED FROM AND MADE A PART OF THE RECORD�AToTIAE COUNCIL MEETING OF NOV 6, 2000 CO OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK NNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK Dear Members of the Huntington Beach City Council, When considering the proposed police parking lot expansion, I ask you \to ask yourselves these questions? 1) Do we need this expansion? Neighbors who have balconies that overlook the current parking lot have told me that the lot never appears to be full, and that personal vehicles are often parked there 2) If, in fact, we do need more parking, is this the only place available? I believe there are other solutions, such as, enclosing a portion of the existing parking on the corner of Main and Yorktown This would be much less expensive and would not impact residential property or destroy a green area with old growth trees 3) Is the proposed cost, $392,000 really the best use of these funds? This money could be used for wages, new equipment, or a host of other needs When making your decision on this agenda item, please consider every possible alternative Sincerely, Joyce Holmes I i November 5 2000 Dear Members of the Huntington Beach City Council My name is Joyce Holmes and I reside at 1911 Park Street My neighbors and I are oppose to the police department parking lot expansion at the current proposed location Enclosed is a copy of a petition which lists approximately fifty downtown residents that are against the destruction of the affected green area Several of us came to speak at the last meeting to present our views and to offer alternative plans We waited until 10 00 then were told the public hearing was going to be delayed until Nov 6 2000 We believed a legitimate appeal had been made on our behalf but then were told that this appeal was now in question All we want is a chance to be heard and an opportunity to work with the city to find a better alternative to the current parking lot plan Please give us that chance Thank you all for your hard work and dedication to our city Whenever possible please protect our limited green areas and residential property Sincerely, Keith Holmes Joyce Holmes MaryAnn Kielb Frank Yee Darleen Yee i I r PETITION PRESERVATION OF THE"GREEN SPACE PARK" Corner of Main Street and Utica We are Huntington Beach citizens in support of the preservation of the"Green Space Park" located on the corner of Rain Street aMd Utica,adjacent to City Hall We oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police parkung lot on this site. Name dress Z1 Si nature Date o0 0 . � _ �z� r_ �c -7 fly--- ---q K - 7M6 V"— .02d YS l r a r t PETITION PRESERVATION OF THE "GREEN SPACE PARK" Corner of Main Street and Utica We are Huntington Beach citizens in support of the preservation of the"Green Space Park" located on the corner of Main Street and Utica, adjacent to City Hall We oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police parking lot on this site. Name Address by Stanature Date G�w o L.; ---_Loos —��� _ ^�L c co-----_ (�- 1 qlcc7 _ SJ $2 _C_.���c.l�� jar _ f E4 of 13rk- r }IR229 "SS PETITION PRESERVATION OF THE "GREEN SPACE PARK" Corner of Main Street and Utica We are Huntington Beach citizens in support of the preservation of the"Green Space Park" located on the corner of Main Street and Utica, adjacent to City Hall We oppose the proposed expansion of the enclosed, secured police parking lot on this site Name Address Zip Signature Date �� 9- -�-- - -- 9�1sIG0 e-5 / i' - - -- �/�+�•_fK -�%� wY+-- /„LV 1_- Name Ad res _ Si nature Date �c _L 4 Y�-�� w��, ►��_ _ i�ESQ _ P�-_� - � ---`��� -- {��! � �v ��- ��2y-� Appeal Of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 Police Department Parking Lot Expansion N r a.- 1 10/12/00 < f 1 7 Project Proposal • Expand existing 108 space secured Police Department parking lot by adding 90 spaces at NEC of Main St and Utica Avenue - Associated improvements • Perimeter landscaping • Fencing • New double swing door • Asphalt paving of 0 7 ac landscaped area 2 10/12/00 I 1 Planning Commission Action • August 2000 - Planning Commission approved project with modifications - Primary protect revisions • Intensified perimeter landscaping • Replacement of 6 mature trees at 2 1 ratio • Addition of trees between parking area and access driveway • Replacement of perimeter chain link fence with decorative block wall within 2 years • Restrict parking on east portion of site to detective vehicles • Provision of cut off or dimmed lighting after 10 PM 3 10/12/00 L� ) Appeal • September 2000 —Appeal Is filed by Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman - Cited reasons for appeal • Impacts to adjacent residential area • Loss of open space at the Civic Center Complex • Cost of perimeter block wall i 1 i 4 10/12/00 I 2 I 1 Appeal Issues Analysis • Impacts to adjacent Residential - Setbacks • 110 ft to east(20 ft alley/20 ft perimeter landscape buffer/ 35 ft driveway access/35 ft landscape area) • 75 ft to south (15 landscape buffer/60 ft Utica ROW) - The proposed landscaping and 110 ft and 75 ft setbacks will adequately separate and screen the parking from adjoining residential areas 5 10/12/00 Appeal Issues Analysis cont ) • Impacts to adjacent Residential (cont ) - Lighting/Glare • Proposed project will provide adequate lighting to ensure personnel and property security • Light fixture shields will be utilized to prevent potential light spillage and glare • Lighting Plan is required to ensure cut off or dimmed lighting along the parking lot perimeter after 10 PM - Based on the lighting plan shields and cut off or dimmed lighting no impacts are anticipated i 6 1 oil2ioo ' I i I 3 I i i / \I Appeal Issues Analysis cont ) • Impacts to adjacent Residential (cont ) - Noise • New double swing gate will reduce noise generated by the existing sliding gate • Detective vehicle parking will be on east side of parking lot to minimize parking space use and associated Impacts - The proposed swing gate and restricted parking will ensure reduction of noise Impacts to the maximum extent possible 7 10/12/00 �l Appeal Issues Analysis cont ) • Loss of openspace P � - Land Use • The site is part Civic Center Complex provides perimeter landscaping and enhances the aesthetic quality of the Civic Center • The site is not utilized for any specific function by City Departments and is not designated as open space • Required Civic Center Complex landscaping —8% • Proposed landscaping—29% - Providing police services while maintaining adequate landscaping Is consistent with Civic Center Master Plan j I $ 10/12/00 I I I 4 � / 1 � J Appeal Issues Analysis cont ) • Loss of open space (cont ) - Landscaping/Screening . 6 mature trees will be removed/replaced at 2 1 ratio . Intensified landscaping will be provided along street frontages • Additional trees will be provided in the area between the access way and the parking area - The proposed landscaping mitigation measures will adequately screen and enhance the projects appearance from street frontages and adjacent residences 9 10/12/00 Appeal Issues Analysis cont ) • Block wall Cost - Perimeter Fence Design • 10 ft chain link fence w/dark green fabric will match existing temporary fence • Chain link fence for the entire secured Police Department parking lot will be replaced with decorative block wall within 2 years from project approval - Recommended block wall is consistent with other development projects along City Urban Scenic Corridors and further mitigates potential impacts to adjacent residences 10 10/12/00 5 Appeal Issues Analysis cont ) • Block wall Cost (cont ) - Perimeter Fence Cost • Estimated project cost total $392 000 includes the cost for removal/replacement chain link fence $162 000 • Estimated parking structure cost $ 1 500 000 - The proposed parking lot expansion represents the best fiscal solution to the parking issue The required decorative block wall will contribute towards adequately mitigating aesthetic project impacts 11 10/12/00 I Staff Recommendation • Approve CUP No 00-39 based upon - General Plan goals and objectives for continuation of public safety uses to support community demands - Project compliance with HBZSO - Project compatibility with adjacent residential uses - Maintaining high quality levels of service - Requiring perimeter screen wall to enhance the appearance of the project 12 1 10/12/00 6 LJ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH jo. LJ 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK October 17 2000 At the regular City Council meeting of October 16 2000 the following item was continued to the meeting of November 6, 2000 Public Hearing to Consider Appeal Filed by Mayor Pro Tem Tom Harman of the Planning Commission's Approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 (Police Department Parking Lot Expansion to Add 90 Secured Parking Spaces at City Hall, 2000 Main Street, We Corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue) A copy of the page from the Action Agenda relating to this item is enclosed for your review (Telephone 714 536 5227) • Office of the City Clerk J� CITY of HUNTINGTON BEACH PO Box 190 California 92648 MR NORM WESTWELL 17171 Englewood Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92647 o Office of the City Clerk ,I CITY of HUNTINGTON BEACH PO Box 190 California 92648 Ms Juana Mueller 603 - 21st St Huntington Beach, CA 92648 8�9Z6 v0 `gouag uoa2uzjunH 3S ')IJud 1161 gTazx uuuXJPN sL1 8tb9Z6 e"OPILD 061 x08 Od f HDVIS NO1DNI1Nf1H Jo A-LID i I.aalJ All:) ay;jo az)i}}O 0 i Office of the City Clerk Ij 04 A- CITY of HUNTINGTON BEACH • PO Box 190 California 92648 Ms Christine Bryden 1917 Park St Huntington Beach, CA 92648 J� Office of the City Clerk CITY of HUNTINGTON BEACH PO Box 190 California 92648 Mr James Thomas 1915 Park St Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r kr • Office of the City Clerk J� CITY of HUNTINGTON BEACH PO Box 190 California 92648 MR FRANK YEE 1907 PArk St Huntington Beach, CA 92648 •�J Office of the City Clerk CITY of HUNTINGTON BEACH PO Box 190 California 92648 MS DARLEEN YEE 1907 Park St Huntington Beach, CA 92648 a 8179Z6 V0 `uosag uoj2uijunH IS �izEd 106T 7�HdUW VSzq SW 8b9Z6 e[UaolileD 06L X08 Od HDd38 NOIDNIINf1H Jo Ally RH �IaalJ Alit ayt jo a�i}}O • Office of the City Clerk J["Jee CITY of HUNTINGTON BEACH PO Box 190 California 92648 MS JOYCE HOLMES 1911 Park St Huntington Beach, CA 92648 • Office of the City Clerk JJ CITY of HUNTINGTON BEACH PO Box 190 California 92648 MR JOSEPH J RACANO 317 5th Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 o,suots f )LIL' �c C icy Clerk gton Beach \ 1 ,ne City Clerk P O Box 190 , ' Huntington Beach CA 92648 ' �� Irir��IrA if � 1 r 0 02 30 INGTpy Gianat V (` 0� Mo.ro.„f BF 41, Ca d#114 °1 �, Lriauna Ca 92653 5517 A*" rl - i NTV gyp` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie b 6ckl, i ���((/I lerk o F City of 1 r406. � ich -- OffiWbJ"sty 61blk -I PO BqN 111�LQ1'� HuntingtotYTT6ach"CA 92648 Flo I IJ' ++ 'fin/ ��J 1f T CO23 043 06 INGTpy Ronald&Pam Poonsaegnsathit 1932 Pme St Huntington Beach Ca 92648 v POON932 926488001 1N 28 10/11/00 RETURN TO BENDER NO PORWARD ORDER ON FILW �pUNTV ca` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 3zsm, Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach �6 G� /►� �-��' , _ Office of the City Clerk O fell j �s P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 024-133-23 t 3 INGTp RAY MICHAELS H 4311 E OSBORN RD �O� `• "ro"+,,c �Fq PHOENIX AZ 85018-5923 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk OF PO Box190 1 Huntington Beach CA 92648 ' NI l F tW7 16 553 , INGTpy KAREN LYNN STEES �+� 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#1006 ti _�•C0"1°""F, �F,��' HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-2862 C.3 vor"' �-- Q Q 9scF ,list pppNTY ca` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING '�'GF.4as {4,Ut1a II111111111111111�i I�Il11111{�Ili�lllllltiltli�ll!llli ti�ill 1 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 x x H i�,k 1EZ7 LCaigE,it��! 937 16-488 I 'TING DAWN ARNOLD Aro.,,o � PO BOX 24042 Cyl W�39 _ - - INDIANAPOLIS IN 46224-0042 1 ARNO042 462242006 1A99 22 10/12/00 RETURN TO SENDER � �"�'� � ARNOLD — BO CLOSED `�t» ne�►p �O UNABLE TO FORWARD N a`\ RETURN TO SENDER LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ar,� a46s�bt�y} ►I�i����l�i�ll���l„ll��l�tl ���„Ill�l,�ll�„l�l� tl�����l,ll Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937*475 INGTpy NIKHIL&ASHIMA MEHTA (' ,,w"roN,rfo �l,� 215Y CHITAAVE lOL ` O(� — y HUNTXGTON BEACH CA QWAQ oonn MEI-,T2iS 925Li8LOOn 1499 Ob 10/ii/00 FORWAPO T211E F P RTN TO SEND C MEF-TA y 15526 LA SIERRA DR 9 'P �QQ CHINO I-ILLS CA 91709-1325 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ssa,beAeD%1MAtiO, Ill I I II I 'll Ill , , 1lJ 1 ,II 1 I II ,I,I1 I11113Ii1 lil`1'I �� it II lilt I` �� it fill lil lillll� d%,WxvS $IVIizE ONIdb3H onond - 3011ON IV931 1 I S£43-839Z6`dO HO`d3a NOISNIlNnH "d - V'1� £OL#Nl HONt21 1,096L (3iOMSNE) -I SAar10 p19NI1N� 1 Mr-SL L£6 JCa� on , 9V9Z6 VO weag uol6uqunH i 06 L x09 0 d Njolo A110 a41 fo a0140 tic \r yoea8 uol6uqunH to A110 ' �aal0 A110 Aumn ooae a1uuo0 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach - Office of the City Clerk O� ETUgN PO Box 190 / (/( To Huntington Beach CA 92648 SE1%DfR RNED FOR UAMP ( POSTS 937 16 540 I NGTpy ILENE S GREEN Q� `ScARPON4 fc BF 2323 HUNTINGTON ST#901 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2860 v 9 � Q p�pMTY Cp` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 1 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk PO Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 x x 4� C.i1 Se I 939 50-540 2 5 A LEONARD LEE&NANCY S BAILEY / �NTINGTp 1377 E CITRUS AV#157 P� REDLANDS CA 92374-4012 1 C-0 9y pp�NTY J ����,1,1 Af NQTICE - UBLIC HEARING �.__.. r � Ck ✓ 1y1t U �Y,S Y� �_�` f �"+�'i:.Y*+�4�'t�J�ti'ET�� �� T�tM�� p� p yc• PY "5+�t�,�,+ 14 SW Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 's Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 ' �{r✓ v a - L ,t .d._ W 024133-29 (J MOLA DEVELOPMENT CORP / 1NGTpy� NEWPORTT BEACH CA92660-2 ^' o N`T Jlz-EGAt NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING J;(� 'T-)Ti i 7 G�JFJ`� �UMT' t { fl�ifilli+fil,IllIIlll1,+11f 1 Connie Brockway City Clerk / City of Huntington Beach �`'~ � `)r��''� Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 7,0 4124-1133-26j'2-7 INGTOy� TOWN SQR TOWNHOMES ASS ' 0 P, %�w"ro"+rfo �c` 4699 JAMBOREE RD C.2 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660-2504 T� PVTV LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING --u- ` If I ~,ti{�tIU�III 11111111111111 11111►1 r Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk PO Box 190 1 ,� Huntington Beach CA 92648 , x x H �..ir1 9V -A�/,CWI, NZ 023 041 07 J` INGTpy Pacific Coast Homes .ro.,,Fo 6�9� PO Box 285 v �� — _ _ Houston Tx 771� I J ` c�uNT a LEGAL NOTLGE-PUBLIC HF�ING_ _ I 1 i i �i Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach C) *, , Office of the City Clerk P O Box 190 �� �� V) r r� ,1 Huntington Beach CA 92648 i A� 939-50 572 ' INGTpy 10 &LORRA►NE RICCIPRDI =tUuon�� B� 7HVN�Trl�Np P IC COT FfY#239 � N BEAM CA9�648 I? Igo s pppNTY ca` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING J4 () ( (J )}} '3L��4$ l+�»1^¢ IIl1'l�FISllllf!ltftil,r I !IlI1 3lIII SIl�ti! III331l11�! I c • \ Ehring, Liz � r To Fauland Herb /�/o Cc Lugar Robin Kuhnke Elaine Wolfe Amy / Subject RE Please Inform the Clerk s Office if Harman s Appeal of the Police Dept Parking Lot Expansion will return 9/2001 so that we may prepare labels Thx Thanks Herb you just saved me an a mall with the Nov 6 2000 minutes attached referring to the fact that the public hearing was set for the first meeting in September(which would be Tuesday 09/04/01 due to the Labor Day holiday) and must return in some form for appropriate action (Herb Connie suggests if you would continue. Instead of tabling to a date certain ) Thanks Liz Original Message From Fauland Herb Sent Wednesday July 11 2001 11 42 AM To Lugar Robin Kuhnke Elaine Cc Ehring Liz Wolfe Amy Subject RE Please Inform the Clerk s Office if Harman s Appeal of the Police Dept Parking Lot Expansion will return 9/2001 so that we may prepare labels Thx Even though this item is anticipated to be tabled we need to re notice this as if this is a new item The reason is twofold 1)the amount of time since the last hearing and 2)we said we would re notice the item when it returned in September Planning will re notice this Item Original Message From Lugar Robin Sent Wednesday July 11 2001 11 29 AM To Kuhnke Elaine Cc Ehring Liz Wolfe Amy Fauland Herb Subject RE Please Inform the Clerk s Office if Harman s Appeal of the Police Dept Parking Lot Expansion will return 9/2001 so that we may prepare labels Thx ' Amy and Herb feel that this item will be tabled in September and therefore will not require a Public Hearing If you have questions Amy has been in touch with the Police Department and can provide more information Original Message From Ehring Liz Sent Wednesday July 11 2001 10 48 AM To Kuhnke Elaine Lugar Robin Subject FW Please Inform the Clerk s Office If Harman s Appeal of the Police Dept Parking Lot Expansion will return 9/2001 so that we may prepare labels Thx Elaine This hearing when it returns will be renoticed The publlch hearing notice will go through your department for approval prior to our department Thanks Liz I Original Message— From Kuhnke Elaine Sent Tuesday July 10 2001 4 05 PM To Ehring Liz Cc Lugar Robin Subject RE Please Inform the Clerk s Office if Harman s Appeal of the Police Dept Parking Lot Expansion will return 9/2001 so that we may prepare labels Thx Liz It has been on the Planning Dept s list for some time Please check with Robin Lugar to confirm that the date is still good Elaine Original Message From Ehring Liz Sent Tuesday July 10 2001 11 15 AM To Kuhnke Elaine Zelefsky Howard Subject Please Inform the Clerk s Office if Harman s Appeal of the Police Dept Parking Lot Expansion will return 9/2001 so that we may prepare labels Thx 1 (11) November 6, 2000 - Council/Agency Agenda - Page 11 a­2-sf_ C'iQ D 2 (City Council) Public Hearing Continued Open from October 16, 2000 to Consider Appeal Filed by Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman of the Planning Commission's Approval of Conditional Use Permit No 00 39 (Police Department Parking Lot Expansion to Add 90 Secured Parking Spaces at City Hall, 2000 Main Street, We Corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue) (420 40) Public hearing to consider the following Appellant Mayor Pro Tern Tom Harman t �0 Applicant City of Huntington Beach f Request To appeal the Planning Commission s decision to approve the expansion of the existing 108-space secured Police Department parking lot by adding 90 secured parking spaces for a total of 198 parking spaces Location 2000 Main Street (City Hall We corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue) Environmental Status Notice is hereby given that this item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ** Twelve letters to the City Council in opposition to the project (distributed in the Agenda Packet) ** Two letters in opposition to the project received by the City Clerk on October 11 2000 (Late Communication Packet) PowerPoint slide presentation titled Appeal of Conditional Use Permit No 00 39 was subanitted to Lhe City-Clerk s Dffi(,c cn Oc,tobe,12.2000 On File A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk s Office 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach CA 92648 for inspection by the public A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk s Office after October 12 2000 All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above If you challenge the City Council s action in court you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at 714 536 5271 and refer to the above item Direct your written communications to the City Clerk 1 Staff report 2 City Council discussion 3 Open public hearing 4 Following public input close public hearing Recommended Action PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION Motion to Approve Conditional Use Permit No 00-39 with findings and conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO 1) [City Clerk announced Late Communications pertaining to public hearing] [Public hearing closed with decision continued to first meeting in September 2001, at which time said hearing to be renoticed Approved 6-0-0-1 (Julien — Abstain)] (Counctlmember Harman left at 1 35 a m J i R A ROUTING C INITIAT ING DEPARTMENT Planning SUBJECT APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 00-39 (Police Department Parking Lot Expansion) COUNCIL MEETING DATE October 16, 2000 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attomey) Not Applicable Subleases Third Party Agreements etc (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget over $5 000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Attached Commission Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS REVIEWED RETURNED FORWARDED Administrative Staff ( ) ( ) Assistant City Administrator (Initial) City Administrator (Initial) City Clerk ( ) EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use RCA Author HZ SH AW kjI