Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Sign Appeals - 1974-1984 - Use Permit 73-4 - Planned Sign Pr
Superior Court _ V ornis STATE OF CALIFORNIA W1^' I���.„•�•"'• (/ In and for the County of Orange r (f CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH .�. PRO4Fn ps!DyICATIWL____ .---- City Clerk i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING Bt.taotGluornia ; COMMISSION DENIAL Cwnty of Orange ~ Mary E. Herhon �rL .1 w � That I an and at all Umes hertin mentioned was aacittizenn of the United Blanes,over the age of twenty-one years, n am rot a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter, �Mwta�w that 1 am the principal clerk of the printer of the Hunt"ton Beach Index. Review ar. a newspaper of general circulation,published it the City of w + KI a fiats Huntington Beath County of Orange and whkb newspaper is published for the dimmination or"news and intelligence of a general charac- ter,and which newspaper at all lima httein mentioned had y �' and still has a bona ride subscription list of paying subscribers, abd wl.irL terrspaper has been established,printed and pub. A s Is ob W' fished at regular intervah in the said County of Orange for a ;A prwt. t period excetding one year, that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy,has been published in the regular fur and entire isaue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement ,.y ,, '••"'" thereof,on the following dates,to wit: ce rpj� j j c 11/8/1984 iop S t".HatM�eilai.l�i.. i I certify for declare)under penalty of perjury that the for-0. Ing is true and correct Dated at...Garden Grove Californ`iaa.this 8th•dayof....Nov..19..84... i t v 3T061 a �, �,�► CITY OF HUNTli' G1"ON BEACH 20W MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK December 19, 1984 Paul E. Wimmer, President Maxwell's 317 Pacific Coast Highway Huntington Beach, CA 92648 The CityCouncil of the city of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting Y 9 9 9 held Monday, December 17, 1984 denied your appeal relative to Special Sign Permit 184-6. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to prdvisions of Sewtion 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from December 19, 19B4 to apply to the courts for judicial review. . Please contact this office if you have any questions. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:js Enclosure l cc: Ormonde Butler 3225 Lacy Street Los Angeles, CA 90U31 (TWMpfw w:7144364227) REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date November 5 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Service 1 Subject: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 84-6 (APPEAL) �*q n ORMONDE BUTLER 7..! OY COUNCIL, Statement of issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alteme lve,-Actlont..,kttachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Special Sign Permit No. 84-6 is a request by applicant Ormonde Butler to permit a 25 foot high pole sign for Maxwell' s Restaurant with 110 square feet of sign area and a flashing electronic message board. The proposed sign would be located approximately five feet from the front property line in a landscaped planter to. the east of � the driveway entrance and is intended to replace the existing Maxwell's sign at this location. The property is zoned Downtown Specific Plan, District 10 (Pier-related commercial) . The Community Services Department has reviewed and approved in concept the sign proposal. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION: � The Planning CoLmission held a public hearing on the Special Sign Permit on August 21, 1984. ON MOTION BY ERSKINE AND SECOND BY LIVENGOOD, SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 84-6 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL•: 1. The proposed sign would constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with otbor properties in the vicinity. 2. The proposed sign would adversely affect other signs in the area. 3 . The proposed sign would be detrimental to other property in the vicinity. 4. The proposed sign is inconsistent with the design concept for the nowntown Specific Plan. 5. The proposed sign would constitute a traffic hazard as it would be a distraction for passing motorists. No 4181 AYES: Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: Higgins, Schumacher, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny Special Sign Permit No. 84-6 subject to the findings of the Planning Commission as listed above. ANALYSIS: The proposal is inconsistent with the City's Sign Ordinance (Article 976) in the following areas: 1. Height: Section 9760 .7 specifies that for a sign to be 25 feet a�i'gh, it must be set back a minimum of twenty-one feet from the front property line. The proposed sign would be located approx- imately five feet from the front property line, an encroachment of sixteen feet. 2. Square Footage: Section 9760 .7 specifies that freestanding signs over 100 square feet in area setback a minimum of thirteen feet from the front property line. The proposed sign, with a five foot setback, would encroach eight feet into this required setback. 3. Electron',: Reader Board: section 9760.29 expressly prohibits any sign wKichncorporates flashing, moving, pulsating, or intermittent lighting, except public service signs such as those for time and temperature. The proposed sign includes a 25 square foot "electronic message center" (7 lamps high by 64 lamps wide) . The proposed sign's location is a prominent area near the beginning of the Huntington Beach pier. It is a large and massive structure; the column alone is four feet across. '''he setbacks prescribed by code for a sign of this size (as noted above) are designed to lessen the visual impact from the street. The applicant's request to encroach into the required setback by up to sixteen feet woulu result in a structure that would overwhelm its setting. Section 3.1 of the Downtown Specific plan, Design Concept, states that "developments at the pier should be scaled to a 2edestrian level." The proposed sign would be contrary to the character of t Downtown area. The location is not in competition with other freestanding signs since the only other freestanding sign nearby is a low profile one for the pier itself. The message board, which would flash messages across its face, would be a distraction and possible traffic hazard with the high volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic along and across Pacific Coast Highway. The sign could create a dangerous precedent for the Downtown area. To approve a sign with flashing lights and with a greater size and height than even the current code allows, would be contrary to the City's design concept in the Downtown Specific Plan. -2- i 1 ' ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to Section 15103, Class 3 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is categorically exempt. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Approve Special Sign Permit No. 84-6. ATTACHMENTSt 1. Area map. 2. Planning Commission staff report dated August 21, 1984. 3. Letter of Appeal dated September 11, 1984. 4. Site plan and elevations. CWT:JWP:JA:lp i (1358d) -3- f t i InMH ,r sR2•po �.�.RR2PD"sue tc1c obi. \ +y~ +• R2 !'• !� �� ` DUMa1T6MN SAIFIC PabU iY1H •b'OCt�� ;`-07XSTA'C7+ye�aJ �.t R2•PD i m .z, r qA \ - � MH R2 PD .po '0 oowWVM SPEOFIC PLAN if \ a j HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION. s t ' nhuntington beach developmt;at services departmen STAff EPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE : August 21, 1984 SUWECT: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 84 -6 APPLICANT: Ormomde Butler DATE ACCETPED: 3225 Lac; Street Los Angeles, Ca 90031 July 18, 1904 r R UEaT: To permit erection of a MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE : 25 ft. high pole sign j with 110 sq. feet of sign. September 18 , 1984 G electronic message board LOCATION : 317 Pacific Coast Hwy. ZONE: Downtown Specific South side of PCH, east mans Distract 10 - Pier � of the Municipal Pier. Related Commercial ACREAGE: .51 Acres GENERAL PLAN -, Visitor-serving commercial EXISTING USE: Restaurant I 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Deny Special Sign Permit No. 84-6 based on the findings outlined in Section 5 .0. 2.0 GENERAL INF'ORKNTI(N : Special Siqn Permit No. 84-6 is a request to permit a 25 foot high pole sign for Maxwell's Restaurant with 110 square feet of sign area and a flashing electronic message board. The proposed sign would be located approximately five feet from the front property line in a Landscaped planter to Lhe east of the driveway entrance. This sign is intended to replace the existing Maxwell' s sign at this location. The Community Services Department has reviewed and approved the sign proposal. 3.0 ENVI10NMENTAL S'PATUS: Pursuant to Section 15103, Class 3 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is categorically exempt. r f 4.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The proposal is i.naonsistent with the City' s Ordinance Code (Article .476) in the following areas. The incorporation of flashing and a moving copy electronic reader board is expressly prohibited (Section. 9760.29) . 1. _Hei4 ht: The code specifies that for a sign to be 25 feet hig h,it must be set back a minimum of twenty-one feet from the fron- property line (Section -9760. 7) . The proposed sign is located approximately five feet from the front property line, an encroachment of sixteen feet. 2. Square Footage : The code specifies that freestanding signs over 100 square feet must be setback a minimum of thirteen feet from the front property line (Section �j 9760 .7) . The proposed sign, with a five foot setback, would encroach eight feet into this required setback. 3. Electronic Reader Board: Section 9760 .29 prohibits any sign which ncorporates flashing , moving, pulsating , or intermittent lighting , except public service signs such as those for time and temperature. The proposed sign includes a 25 square foot "electronic message center - 7 lartps high by 64 lamps wide ." The proposed sign is located in a prominent area near the beginning of the Huntington Beach pier. it is large and massive structure; the column alone is four feet across. Section 3. 1 of the Downtown Specific Plan, Design Concept, states that "developments at the pier should be scaled to a pedestrian level.." The proposed sign would be contrary to the character of the Downtown r,rea and is not in competition with other freestanding signs. The only other freestanding sign nearby is a low profile one for the pier itself. The message board, which would flash messages across its face, would ' be a distraction and possible traffic hazard to motorists traveling at high speeds on Pacific Coast Highway. In sum, the sign would establish a dangerous precedent for the Downtown area. To approve a sign with flashing lights and with a greater size and height than even the current code allows, would be contrary to the City' s design concept in the Downtown Specific Plan. 5.0 RECOMMENDATION : Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Siqn Permit No. 84 -6 based on the following finding, : FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The proposed sign would constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with other properties in the vicinity. -2- 8-21-34 P .C . 1 2. The proposed sign +:ould adversely affect other signs in the area. 3. The proposed sign would be detrimental to the property in the vicinity. 4. The proposed sign Is inconsistent with the design concept for the Downtown Specific Plan. 5. The proposed sign would constitute a traffic hazard as it would ' be a distraction for passing motorists. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map 2. Si. to Plan 3. Sign Elevation Y- JWP:JA:jr (1054d) 1 A -3- 8-21-84 P .0 . IF CICITY OF K NOTING ERCH'CAL IF. 11 September 1984 CityCleric Ste 13 4 i5 N. 14 Cit of Huntington Reach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Dear Madam: A recent request to the Planning Commission on behalf of Maxwell 's Restaurant by Heath and Company for the installation of a new sign was turned down on August 21 at that departments regular meeting. On the following morning, I contacted Mr. Max Bowman to ask him what procedure would be necessary to appeal that decision to the City Council, and he informed me that the procedure would be to take the official notification of the denial , along with an appeal in writing, together with the proper filing fee to the City Clerk's office. When we received no official notification in due course, I again checked with Mr. Bowman who determined that such notification had been sent to our agent at Heath and Company. By this time the deadline for filing to appeal had elapsed. Due to this unfortunate sequence of events, I would like to petition the City Council for the waiving of the time limitations in this matter and grant a hearing on our proposal . The basis for this is that the proposed sign mould be a replacement of the present badly deteriorated sign. The new sign would be an attractive pprofe-sionally designed structure, erected and maintained on a contractual basis by one of the largest sign companies in the country. This new sign has approximatedly similar dimensions and set backs as the present sign. The drawings and dimensions had been previously submitted and approved by the Community Services Department. Respe tfully submitted, --------------- PAUL E. WIMMER President cc Mr. Max Bowman v 1 317 Parifie Coast Hu v. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 (714) 536.2555 L1 ;T 1•rY ---- --- --- . 190 ! rP.d�4K�G1 LOT; I %t✓� Yv -i • Cs�lt'OSC,�PE , ' ' L��t'DSC..'P= 1, ti �/ �� ` J r `/` F/�E .I i 7Ji / „ ► � f/1 ;ter 1 � ! ACCESS' Or?I�E /f I � f/�Y P?r?rT'LtYG .51r,41RS UP rcESTAURANI� -- _ DATE I.Pt T - EXPIRATION DATE Plax CI+FCx-- PIP-.:IT _,r ROAD 7 i - - EXHIBIT A r..s t r♦rT♦ 1 t-r.i.......�1..1 •• .� }'t•fttt•!1' ♦ / fi tl• 1 •Its 11r .j• r/r.w.,iNl tittr••tYHt•►»r^r+Try'//rfr T 1+1111tf ' +lrlirllt + `Q ttr:i�:.• .•1.+iT•♦t+1rtJ"7�t�►jrtfrrHt+ t+r*rt*♦f�trTfl+f�+•+ 1 ��ra:.«.r r.rn lf�-►rr+r� ( r r+1•t t1 T�rN t• ♦ ..•rr7Yfi+�T'+'*'r: "'ttf•�T�1iF♦+y tT}1T+T I•Ti'}r'T}Tg r;rr ' �.r.f.... ..-rr•.�-. r•r+•rr+ .+.Ytft'r+KT'•'Tr►tt♦TT'rY f!r t y. � .••.• wrr.�rwr.r.r Y*/��Ir^awl �OPi• 1• 1 I , � �1 I ; �• � I I 'r't �!: ' i tell As Sao • Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. 0 0 X 19a CALIFORNIA 92540 Date: August 22, 1984 NOTICE OF Af'T:ON Applicant: Ormomde Butler 3225 Lacy Street. Los Angeles, CA 90031 Subject: Los SIGN PERMIT NO. 84-6 Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission on Auaust 21 , 1994 and your request was: Withdrawn Approved _ Approved with Conditions (See Attached) Disapproved XX Tabled . Continued until Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the Planning Commission is final unless an appeal is filed to the City Council by you or an interested party. Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved. Said appeal must be accompanied by a filing fee of one hundred and sixty-five ($165) dollars and be submitted to the City Clerk 's office within ten (10) days of the date of the Comr.isaion's action. In your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing fee is August 31, 1984 . Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any application becomes null and void one (1) year alter final approval, unless actual construction has started. Very truly yours, w; 6/0Jam`eWn. Pa1in. Secretary A-PC-LT-IA Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 August 22, 1984 APPLICANT: Ormomde Butler 3225 Lacy Street Los Angeles, Ca 90031 REQUEST: To permit erection of a 25 ft. high pole sign with 310 sq. feet of sign. LOCATION: 317 Pacific Coast Hwy. DATE OF DENIAL: August 21 , 1984 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The proposed sign would constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with other properties in the vicinity. 2. The proposed sign would adversely affect other signs in the area. 3. The proposed sign would be detrimental to the property in the i vicinity. 4 . The proposed sign is inconsistent with the design concept for the Downtown Specific Plan. 5. The proposed sign would constitute a traffic hazard as it would be a di::traction for passing Motorists. I hereby certify that Special Sign Permit No. 84-6 was denied by the Planning Commission on August 21, 1984 , upon the foregoing citations. ver truly yours, 1 � o`N 11V James W. Palin, Secretary jr CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH F-,j:.,JB 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY ZLERK November 21, 1984 Paul E. Winner, President Maxwel I Is 317 Pacific Coast Highway Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Please be advised that the public hearing on your appeal filed relative to Special Sign Permit #84-6 has been continued at your request to the December 17, 1984 Council meeting. If you have any questions, please call this office at 536-5227. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt CC: Ormomde Butler (Trlephoni-714-536.52771 811 s r: 14 r+Non.OWr M,4-fog+.• A-IJA C/TY C,OOA04V 1. . C2+� D Qc T�TioK1 To 1( perr& (is-pa" GovN�lt:_ � � D PvBu C— ark. 1Be"flt ( 71 tdrtq JAJ DtiGcft 'i 0 4LL.oW rAl-O? o 0 w 0(-N c o•,PO" y 'e po-rtf mwa c o )7 vim, tAJ G loot [to ( /vutupi' a'de-t-off4)/ /o wD 7rt.4v1' /r&t A D c a 0J+Tl' Psi'cu'r+'rf orf w L4 J,6 Gc.E/wtS o apt cd [�`'� V a 317 Pacific Coast I1tc.v. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 . (714)536.2,555 Publish November 8, 1984' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMPISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO 84-6 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing Will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 19th day of November, 1984, for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 84-6, a request to permit a twenty-five foot high, one hundred and ten square foot pole sign with electronic c-±ssage board less then twenty-one feet back from the frint property line for Maxwell's Restaurant at 317 Pacific Coast Highway. The property is zoned Downtown Specific Plan District 10 - pier related commercial. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. Further information stay be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 -- (714) 536-5227. DATED: November 5, 1984 CITY OF HUNTINCTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk 1 'I 1 n 5 LFGAL NOTICE �nv•�'- ��` C-0VA flj NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ply Gr►�` 4 �a `� � NOTICE S„H REBY G"V!� that a publi hearing will be held by the City n of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Special Sian Permit No. _ 84-61 a request to 'permit a twenty-five foot high, one hundred and ten square foot pole sign- with electronic message board less than twenty-one feet back from the front property line for Maxweil's restauiar,c at 317 Pacific Coast Highway. The property is zoned Downtown Specific Plan District 10 - pier-related commercial . A legal description is on file with the Department of Development Services. Said earing will be held at the hour of 7:00 P.M. on August 21 1 84 � in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All irate ested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their op pions for or against the proposed Special Sign Permit No. 81-6 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 9----th day of Auqust, 1984 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By James W. Palin, Secretary f t ;rcPP 1 CE To w.rh.K 'I'U :;tail:Iri11.F i'Uisi.l t: rii:AK 1{tic; ClA'C► S�CrN PE,eM/T /{/o �ywry ; r1.r.M SfF '.ITY CLERK".; OFFICE nA'a TO; ( l( FROM: _,,,,.G' �� kll L- PLEASE SCHOUIX A i'11i11.iC 11E.ARING 1IS111(. 1'111i xn'AC111in U-N-Al. NWICE roll ' HH. � 14 Y OF 'Y 0Y Pv++► AP's are nttnched Vl� AP's will follow II No AP's Initiated bY: Planning CotmnisRion Plannittr. nr.partment _ Petition — * Appeal _ —lG.- Other Adoption of Environment. ] St"tus W 14 0� Planning Acpnrtmcnt - Extension Refer to for additional information. transmit _x:trl wording 1 �+ hr. rmilred in the lr„nl . * cal pleasepleasetr.'t If app II i . III CITY OF HUNTINGTUN If WALLACE, GWENDOLYN I P.O. Box X90 502 California ST Huntington ach, CA 92648 Ilunti.ngton Beach, CA 9264c, 02 63-010 024-166-03 , _'� r �•. ' MARCHAND L£O D 4801 Curtis Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92649 024-166-04 NELSON, NORMA A i; ;+•:j MARCHAND, LEO D 114 Gcean Ave 4801 Curtis Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 024-163-03 '3z 024-166-05 ORANGE`COAST SPECIALITIES a' � .►� � Project no. 2 P.O. Box 725 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 024-163-08 3�.i'r lr'/. `•4�+rr I.r '"� NELSON, NORMA S P.O. Box 836 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1+*• , 4 024-163-09 37 1j. `IJ" ~d`;�`�►1: GARDNER ERNESTINE If 951 Hamilton Ave ., Pnlo Alto, CA 94301 024-163-10 GARDNER, RICHARD EDWARD j 250 Laurel at San Francisco, CA 94118 ,t 024-163-11 �' ' �r '•,`r NELSON, ALLEN L MORRIS, TOMMIE R NELSON, NORMA 5 ' 116 3rd St P.O. BOX 836 i';;•, Huntington Beach, CA 9264 Hunt'r;•`.on Beach, CA 92648 'r 024-163-13 ?jy-„ Fr7.,1. 024-166-20 PEASE, HARVEY D TUBACIi, GWENDOLYN M TF: ETlJack-in -The-Box Inc �� iIIOEPTNER, MAX C P.O. Box�783 ' 33516 Causer Canyon San Diego, CA 92112 'R' °.:• ' Valley Center, CA 92082 024-163-14 '6 ( r• �' 'f? 024-166-11 TUBACH, GWENDOLYN M TR ET IHOEPTNER, MAX C ��� • 33516 Couser Canyon Valley Center, CA 92082 024-3.66-12 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ' )-,� :' =j• '�! •, P.O. BOX 190 Huntington Beach, CA 9264 '� �+ 024-166-19 4 , :F X, tw_ MARCHAND, LRO D 4801 Curtis Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92649 ; 1 � 024-166-06 2g _ I e104.sec. PGA ; 6 sA ►� 41. R.s8'zx` ; 6. 1Ik- y dz� i j • TUGACH, GWENDOLYN M TR ET AL t, BAGSTAD, ELDON W 901 Cataliala Ave 6Hoeptn@V; Max C Seal Beach, CA 90740 33516 Cousor Canyon Valley Center, CA 92082 024-153-11 024-154-15 TAYLOR, MARGIE J TUBACH,GWENDOLYN •M TR ET AL i GOSNEY, JACK L P.O. Box 725 %Hoeptner, Max C P.O. Box 23 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 33516 Couser Canyon j Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Valley Center, CA 92082 024-154-04 �S• 024-154-05 �"'�; 024-153-12 fiUfii.CH, GWENDOLYN M TR ET AL rf'"; y �'< �► BAXTER, ANNA L %Hoeptner, Max C :, LINDLEY, MARY B 33516 Couser Canyon ;';;,, 17631 Birch Tree LN Valley Center, CA 92082 Irvine, CA 92715 024-154-16 IV. f; 024-153-13 AHDELMUTI, AHMAD HAMED I-':V y�;� 101 MLin St ` Huntington Beach, CA 9264, `��1•'�jia, 024-153-14 ACDELMUTI, AHMAD HAMED 101 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 9264 '5 ^) 024-153-15 ' In '• 1 q ZEIDAN, AD£L M +� •.,! NABER, JOHN M 126 Main St U i � �,•,� Huntington Beach, CA 92648 9 { 024-154-10 rY:ij r!.i FOXX DEVELOPMENT CORP 4Bullis, Manke 6 Nelsons 206 S Division Sti<:n ' �"� �•:�:� . .'arson City, NJ B9701 024-154-11 A • �1 TUBACH, GWENDOLYN M TR ET ALs;/ ' � • % Hoeptner, Max C 33516 Couser Canyon ' • '' Valley Center, CA 92082 - 024-154-12 1 S' !'b1 TUGACH, GWENDOLYN M TR ET AL %Hoeptner, Max C lid•! 33516 Couser Canyon .,• Valley Center, CA 92082 024-154-13 TUGACH, GWENDOLYN M TR ET AL Q +•� r %Hoeptner, Max C 1 <•1 !> w 33516 Couser Canyon Valley Center, CA 92082r 024-154-14 ,q J hUN'Yl.C4't'uf1 11Yrtit:► W p� '' .` 06+r 2110 Main St r Huntington Beach, CA 92648 may , • ~; '',�,`itr.. 024-271-•04 4� ri, C TY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ., u f{u cington 52t;;h, CA 92648 ►n ? CITY OF f NTINGTON BEACH{ Huntington each, CA 92648 1 r4! 024-281-02 "1 , CITY OF HUNTINGTO EACH `��^!:► Huntington Beach, C + ` 9' 40 ark.� i ►v � 024-281-03 �4"7A!•�'. QI HUNTINGTON BEACH CO i iTax Div 225 Bush St 7rr San Francisco, CA 94120 024-281-04 ti HUNTINGTON BEACH CO p Tax Div ► ' ra•- 225 Bush ST Sri San rRancisco, CA 94120 �� 024-281-05tl+,.; +l 'iN !�` F CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH >Hunti ll Q4 Beach, CA 92646 I N 024-281-10 �J •S I/ ' J + %'•vj• f r� HUNTINGTON BEACH{ CO '�� Property Tax Div �-•��� , `•�� �;e'.,;r 225 Bush St San Francisco, CA 94120 024-281-12 Huntington Beach Co ; HUNTINGTON BEACH CO WATKINS, HOMER 2110 Main St i Property Tax Div 34832 Calle Fortuna Huntington Beach, CA 225 Bush St " Capistrano Beach, CA 92624 92648 San Francisco,CA 94120 ' 024-271-01 oza-281-13 i 024-153-08 t • ��, , �6, HUNTINGTON BEACH CO ! FIRST AMERICAN TRUST CO ABDELMUTI, AHMAD NAMED ..^.110 Main St Pacific Trailer Park 101 Hain St. Huntington Beach, CA So. Huntington St Huntington Beach, CA 92648 92648 1 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 024-271-02 024-291••11 024-153-09 13 WOOD, BLANCHE A ET AL "' • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HAMADANI, HOSSEIN N ET AL P. Box 190 SARRABERE, CHARLES Hunt ton Beach, CA 92648 C , 122 Main St +' ?r5A Huntington Beach, CA 92646 024-153-10 7 ,.......t' ..-. __.. f INT11L Superior Court S'I'A7'L:OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTLNGTON BEAM CITY CLERK l��inn n>;r r>1L1g�N --- 1 PUBLIC HEARING I S Late ofCalifurnia ) Appeal to Sign Permit 84-7 County of Orange )t RITA J. RICHTER That I am and at all timr_r herein mentioned was a citizen of t::e United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I am not a party to,nor interested In the above entitled matter, to of Kam low" that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the N daft t .; Huntington Beach Iid. Review • t' 0wit ..rrk.7.f w Nwrirowbw�4' a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of iiadn!'?s�e mup-tA,rCMst7srr' W.HwrWgtsa Etwlti st t!s abbe st 7i1 pa..seas ssu 1llw•st1K Htfntington Bebeh Itwu ON A*now t�.I County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the cu 961 ff up 1% U disemination oNorn)news and intelligence of a genera)charac• �M.Prwtu•a lee,and which newtpaper at all titres herein mentioned had psesi 5 46mAWS and still has a b onn fide subscription list of paying ruhscrib ets, ' of, and which newspaper has been tstablished, printtd anti pub- �sst t t 4 + i i lished ai regular intervals in the bald County of Orange for a t t"s Y�, aw owl period exceeding one year. that the notice, of which the a i annexed is a printed copy,has been published Its the regular and entire ii,aue of raid newapsl,rr,and not in nny supplernent It s �, thereof,on the following dates,to wit: W s t�t��I1•'. �a�l M�+Ma)c• l Ile" . r f1R• 1 October 4, 1984 I;�tfY(Xt� M wtpt f ww 1 certify(or declare)under pr•nalt!•of;•erjury th•ot the forego. ing is true and correct. Ilasal LM ASi.R1111dt , Dated at..................Garden Grove............ C4lifur ta,lllis4t -flay o0ctober.laP�.... f ita J. Righter /�. ................................ tiignature 1, t CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH !1 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 19, 1984 Ken Reynolds 9421 Lailani Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, October 15, 1984 overruled the Planning Commission and approved Special Sign Permit No. 64-7 with conditions. Please contact the Development Services Department For these conditions and further information cn the matter. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:js cc: James Palin - Development Services Director I i I I Telephony;714 53G 52271 4 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date October 4 19A4 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council {� Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator' Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Service Subject: APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 84-7 Statement of Issue, Rwommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Altemative Actions,Attachments: STATF,MENT OF ISSUES The Planning Commission' s denial of Special Sign Permit No. 84-7, a request to permit a third free-standing pole sign adjacent to a planter in an integrated shopping center, has been appealed for the City Counci.l' s consideration. RECOMMENDATION: f The Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommend that the City Council uphold the action of the Planning Commission. ANALYSIS: Applicants Mr. Ken Reynolds 9579 Hamilton Avenue Huntington Beach, California Appellant: Same as above Location: 9579 Hamilton Avenue (south side of Hamilton approximately 230 feet east of Bushard) Request: To permit a third free-standing 20 foot high pole sign in an integrateA shopping center having 600 feet 'of street frontage. Planning Commission Action on September 18, 1984r ON MOTION BY ERSKINE AND SECOND BY WINCHELL, SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT N0, 84-7 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS by THE IOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Erskine, Higgins, Livengood, Mirjahangir, Schumacher, Winchell NOES: Norte ABSENT: Porter ABSTAIN: None PIO 4/81 r-INDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The proposed sign would constitute a ,rant of special privilege inconsistent with other properties in the vicinity• 4' 2. Sufficient signage exists on the premises for a neighborhood k,'I commercial center of this size and shape. �. 3. Because of the location of this neighborhood commercial center and its proximity to residences, the number of signs permitted an the premises should be consistent wi tir the code to reC:-ce excessive lighting impacts from signs. 4 . The proposed sign would adversely affect other signs in the + area. The reposed sign would be detrimental to the surrounding 31 5 . p properties in the vicinity. Discussions v special Sign Permit No. 64-7 is a request to install a 20 foot high, t 96 eq foot multiple tenant pole sign within andouble existing neigghbor1ood shopping center. •ire internally illuminated, free-standing sign will be located along Hamilton Avenue. Plastic und advertising Hamilton Center yellow letters on a dark brown backgro will be displayed at the top of the sign. Tenant copy will divide the remaining portion of the sign utilizing dark brown letters with a yellow background. A rectangular shaped cabinst with adobe texcote 1+ill be provided around the single supporting column. Existing free-standing signs located rlithin this integrated neighborhood shopping center .include a 20' high 7-11 Food Store pole sign and an app.oximate 20' high multiple tenant pole sign advertising Tower Liquor and three tenants. They are approximately 1 345 feet apart. Analysis of the site indicates that the existing two pcle signs and the twenty-one wall reigns appear. nufficient For identifying and advertising the neighborhood shopping center: and respective tenants. The two pole signs are within 5 feet of the front property line and provide optimum street exposure ; the wall signs are highly visible from Hamilton Avenue. The proposed ;dole sign will be placed at a distance of 125 feet from the 7--11 pole sign creating poor separation between free-standing signs which can result in a cluttered appearance. Rather than increase the number of signs located on the subject site, staff- suggests combining the proposed pole sign with one of the existing pole signs and/or possible relocating it to a central location on the site. Under the current sign code, only one free-standing sign is permitted for the shopping center. The neighborhood shopping center is located within a residential area on a primary highway. it doesn' t necessitate excessive signage beccuse there is no competition within the immediate vicinity. In addition, building plttcement and design allow adequate visibility to pasuirg (1226d) -2- RCA Y 4 q 1 ' i motorists. It should be noted that although shopping centers have been permitted -uJdi.tional f^le signs, they are usually located in concentrated commercial areas and contain buildings with greater setbacks causing low street exposure. More illuminated signs create increased lighting which is not conducive to residential neighborhoods . This can be controlled by regulating the hours the signs may be lighted or thL- intensity of lights permitted within the cabinet. The Planning Commission and staff concur that the existing signs meet the intent of. the Ordinance Code and are sufficient to advertise the neighborhood shopping center. Approval of an additional sign at this location will increase the visuwl impact of signs on Hamilton Avenue and may constitute a special prlvil.egi� to the applicant. An alternative action has been provided with conditions and include a provision prohibiting any additional freestanding signs on the adjacent vacant corner lot which is owned by the applicant. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The project is categorically exempt. FUNDING SOURCE; Not applicable Findings For Denial : 1• The proposed sign would constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with other properties in the vicinity, 2• Sufficient signage exists on the ` commercial center of this size and shapes for a neighborhood �• Because of the location and its r roxiklt ty to residences,is neighborhood umber ofosignss permitted center on the premises should be consistent with the code to reduce` excessive: lighting imparts front signs. 4• The proposed sign would adversely affect other signs in the are-a by being too close together. '• The proposed sign would be detrimental to the surrounding properties in the vicinity. 6• There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property that deprive the property owner privileges enjoyed by other shopping centers within similar zoning districts relating to location or shape of property, or topography. (1226a) _3_ RCA , ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reverse the planning Commission' s action and approve special Sign Permit No. 84-7 based on the following findings and conditions: Suggested Findings of Approval: i 1. Strict complian4a with Article 976 will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant; and 2. The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area; and 3 . The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such :Agn; and 4. The F:-oposed sign will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. i Suggested Conditions of A proyal: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing the pole sign combined with one of the existing pole signs. 2. The proposed sign shall be capable of accomodating all businesses within the center. The purpose being to discourage any future requests for a special sign permit. i 3. No free-standing signs shall be permitted on the adjacent vacant lot when developed in the future. 4 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to rescind this Special Sign Permit approval in the event of any violation of i the t rms of the applicable zoning laws. Any such decision shall be preceded by notice to the applicant and a public hearing and shall be based on specific findings. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Appeal letter 2. Planning Commission Action Letter 3. Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 18, 1984 CWT:JWP:SMH: jr II (1226d) -4- RCA • KENNETH A. REYNOLDS, A.I.CA 9421 LEILANI DRIVE � HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92645 /- 1714) 962.1271 Cc•r, September 24, 1984 G Mayor Jack Kelly '� ze, a,C7a i Huntington Eeach City Council , $', Q O P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject : Special Sign Permit No 84-7 Dear Mayor Kelly and Council Members: f This letter is being written to appeal the Planning Commission ' s decision to deny Special Sign Permit No 84-7. Their findings for i denial. are attached herewith. The following comments are in re- sponse to those numbered findings : i 1 . There is no inconsistency with other properties in the vicinity, because this is the only shopping center at i the intersection. i 2. Tenants within the shopping center have servi:e type bus- inesses that depend on street identification and vehicular traffic. They have repeatedly asked us to make applica- tion for a pole sign, because they think it is needed for their business. 3&5 . Not one property owner wrote a letter or appeared at the Planning Commission public hearing to object to our re- quest. The presumed position of eccessive lighting that would he detrimental to the nei-ihborhood is certainly not { one that is shared by our neigv:jorhood or local business ' community. 4 . There is only one shopping center at the intersection of Hamilton and Bushard. other signs have more than enough seperation so there would be no adverse affect . i Thank you for your consideration to this appeal . j� Very truly yo , i i K.A. Heyliolds Encl : Findings for Denial $165 Appeal fee �I Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 82648 T. September 19, 1984 Mr . Keti Reynolds 9579 H•tr•. 1ton Avenue Hung inn_i •in Beach. CA s SUBJECT: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 84-7 I DATE OF DENIAL: September 18, 1964 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL% J . The proposed sign would constitute a grant of special privilege i •tcansistent with other properties in the vicinity. 2 . Sufficient aignage exists on the premiaen for a neighborhood commercial center of this size and shape. '~ 3 . Because of the location of this neighborhood commercial center and Its proximity to residences, the number of signs permitted on the x. premises should be consistent with the code to reduce excessive lic. sting impacts from signs. r 4 . The proposed sign would adversely affect other signs in the area . , t ti 5. The proposed sign would be detrimental to the surrounding properties in the vicinity. I hereby certify than Special Sign Permit No. 84-7 Was denied by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Hea..;h on Tuesday, September 18, 1984, upon the foregoing findings . Very truly yours, (a f James W. Palin, Secretary .tWP:MA: }t ( 1175d) huntington beach developn,.:nt services department %Af t IEPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: September 18, 1984 SUBJECT: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 84-7 APPLICANT: Mr. Ken Reynolds DATE ACCEPTED: 9579 Hamilton Avenue August 20, l 84 Huntington Beach, .CA REQUEST: To permit a third MANDATORY_ PROCESSING_ DATE: freestanding 20 ft. high pole sign in an October 19, 1984 integrated shopping center having 600' of street frontage ZONE: C4 (Highway Commercial District) I :�C ►TION: 9579 Hamilton GENERAL PLAN: Genera Commercial ACRE^�AGE s N/A EXISTING USE: Shopping Center i 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Deny Special Sign Fermit No. 84-7 based on to findings and condtions of approval outlined in Section 6.0 of this report. ` 2,0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit No. 84-7 is a request to permit a third freestanding pole sign adjacent to a planter within a shopping center parking lot. The proposed sign is internally illuminated, 96 square feet in size, and 20 feet high. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to Section 15301 (9) , Existing Fanilities, of the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is categorically exempt. 4.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING, AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Pro2erty: General Plan Designation: General Commercial Zone: Land Use: er ciel A•FM435 r S.S.P. 84-7 September 18, 1984 Page 2 North of Subject Property: General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zone: R1 Land Use: Residential East of Subject Property: General Plan Designation: Medium Density Zone: R2 Land Use: Residential t South of Subject Property: ; General Plan Designation: Low Density Zone: R1 Land Use: Residential West of Subject Property: General Plan Designation: Low Density Zone: R1 Land Use: Vacant 5.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: A special sign permit is required for the proposed sign because it does not conform to Section 9760.7 (a) requiring all freestanding signs to be placed within a landscaped planter; this section furc5er provides that no portion of a sign may extend beyond the perimeters of said planter. The proposed sign is adjacent, but not within, a 5 foot wide planter and one-half of it extends beyond the perimeter of the planter a diAtance of 4 feet into the parking lot. Also, the sign does not comply with Section 9760.7 (c) which allows one additional freestanding sign for every 600 feet of street frontage in excess of a minimum of 700 feet, provided the signs are a minimum of 600 feet apart. The subject shopping center has 600 feet of street frontage along Hamilton Avenue; 1300 fret of street freontage is required for two freestanding signs and 1900 for three. There are currently two freestanding signs on the integrated shopping center site, approximately 345 feet apart. One sign is 80 square feet in size advertising a 7-11 Food Store exclusively, for which a conditonal exception was granted in 1969 allowing the sign to exceed the maximum sign area of 70 square feet. This sign was built in 1969. The other sign contains two separate cabinets approximately 70 square feet in total area, promoting Tower Liquor and three other tenants; it was installed in 1971. Both of these signs were approved prior to 1976 under the requirements of the previous sign code, which permitted a freestanding sign per detached building. (1145d) S.S.P. 84-7 September 18, 1984 Page 3 The proposed third pole sign consists of a multiple panel daOble face cabinet allowing each tenant to advertise their business. Staff believes this pole sign lof unnecessary number and visibility of will bevisually distracting because existing piles the bepremises. modified totaccommodate suggested multiple-tenant existing pole signs advertising, which will provide excellent center and tenant identificrtion and eliminate the need for an additional pole sign. ins woud be Another alternative would be s �o be monument signs modify n existing andithe new l pole to modify the existing sign Additional advertising is sign to be a multiple-tenant sign. wall signs along the building face, presently provided by the 21 which are easily visible from the street. 6.0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Sepcial Sign �} Permit No. 84-7 based upon the following findings: SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL,: 1. The proposed sign would constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with other properties in the vicinity. yu 2. Sufficient sign&ge exists on the premises for a neighborhood 5; commercial center of this size and shape. 3. Because of the location of this neighborhood commercial center and its proximity to residences, the number of signs permitted on the premises should be consistent with the code to reduce excessive lighting impacts from signs. 4. The proposed sign would adversely affect other signs in the area. 5. The proposed sign would be detrimental to the surrounding properties in the vicinity. ATTACHMENTS% 1. Area Map 2. Site Plah 3. Sign Elevation JwP:5M :df (1145d) ' i } •z• �i l RA-C - 'r�` . . r [�_ Rl� ;per- _ •.• _ [[� t � ;; l ^�•'d.CfLSYC11Mi71 - C RI �� R� R2 R21 :{ { y E s R r- RZ sT cz r.k. RA-0 '• • Rt Rf 3 -RZ �- x J t ftl � • ��•- ww t RI R I Fit R2 RI Rt �I R1 Al R1 RI F —. • 41 R t E �•r _ -- • RI R 3 R3' V .1 RI R1 R1 � . R3 1 LLcf- RI ' I R1 RI cc C + u Rt E R! s • I '•` Y R1 R RI a R I ma's - t RI R1 K Ph ml a - RI , ... .. a Li 3 RI F ' RI GF-R RiJ RI • - _ AVE � sa�Kc _ — MHTTNG 0m Kum ' HUNJINGTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION i N w..t•_r. - s/r►.•�Y I ate.•r I�.....�..M�• ;. t• �rtrlav ,�tv/�xv! �1 ri A I KZ.Zzu 1- `fir i` � _„-���_._-_ r_._�.�...�• ^- �_ ' ---_ _ —� � fl O.a•�.-�_�^-O---Q----t �w.•rea w' � '�"'r.,a.cic Y_ "'.' � cc l • II �. #8e 7 ' i •Yr 4.. �w y .M.H a/.r./ W.1/..>✓/.f Wa..>r aK • ..,,.�.r.�w.w-r .......ram.r.•tr.r+. x- .�Ur...--....•.•ter Ve 1 \, 00 D� . ytuaw ppstA ter--•- < li / ,�.� .'�:«,'•1}I. :ref r; .. .!,r.� •1 +1 Vf.•, 1 •b� •f•I:1• • . , EF yµ►t ID ,Mea1 I : i►1GTUN BEACH ,,; - D_ LOPMENT SERVICES Publish 10 4 84 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NJ. 84-7 INOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council f of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on ninnday the lth day of October 1984 . for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 84-7, a request to permit a third freestanding pole sign 1 adjacent to a planter in an integrated shopping center having 600' of street frontage 4 in lieu of the provisions of Sections 9760.7 (a) and 9760.7 (c) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The proposed pole sign is 20' high and consists of a double-face, i 96 square foot multiple tenant cabinet sign which is internally illuminated. The i subject property is located at 9579 Hamilton Avenue, south side, approximately 320' east of the Hamilton Avenue and Bushard Street intersection and is zoned C-4 - (Highway Commercial). A legal description and sign plan are available for review in the Development Services Department. i All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their I ` opinions for or against said _appeal, II , j Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 I � DATED 9�,�818A CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk 7 Publish NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING hrll"r NA 8q .-'7 i NOTICE ?S HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council i of the City or Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:S0 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as /L�DnJ Possible on the IC-, day of ©GT': 198& ` for the purpose of consi, -.ring AN AFFeglt. -m -n4 I IN AN 1N'7a6TjzA -Wp -e=HOP'mer GeN•7e'- twlmer copor cor e-,�T T oI '7 Co©,-7 a OF T14U 1:!,. C9P19AW-;--- GO PE« THE PRO�sj2p PizLt slqN IS 201 01414 "V C-OKSls`rS. ©F e * A PdXWL/S -tea qro sci. 'f'T- / Miwc IRS KT ee eme-T- 5'" viiiIC.Ft IS H A M I M M A!e 'jr*ox3Tk �1p Ar?FS4X1MA1W1.`F 320' LAs-r 610- 'T}1ev- NAYMI LQ M prV�15 /,�rr t,D 13 USkt A PP I N` '1'ty LTtanl A t4 q> `nL 2.0t,4 1P h1 RAN Ate /$irAtt,A ,,L '�� ��1J`� a`'� t N Y�-{S (7e�', CAM, All interestetr persons are invited to attend said hearing and express -,heir opinion:, for c,:• against said .> tj -� f'.trther inforxa; tion may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main 'h Street, tiwitin',ton Bleach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 I I'"I U -- - ------- — - CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth i City Clerk i T� '.VIC'C. Tiv-012SON IRMA AV1I,A STUAla L. DOUGLAS 9551 BOP3A CIRCLE 21471 PINETREE 14. 21432 PINETREF: IN. HUNTINGPON BEACH, CA 72646 11UNTINC:I�IV BL:A('ll, CA 92646 HUNTING"rGN BEACH, CA 92c'�P 149•-201-69 149-281-08 : 149-282-07 I WILLIAM T. CERRI AMIR K. KORAB FR. D KREJCI t 9561 BORBA CIRCLE 9522 PEPPERTREE DR. 21431 AUGUSTA CIRCLE HUNTINGPON EEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGrON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTING7t3N BEACH, CA 92(o4V j 149-201•-70 149-281-09 i149-282-08 JOSEPH SELLEH JR. EDMUND T. SAMOKER MICHAEL LAWSON 8729 FRAZER FIVER CIRCLE 9542 PEPPERTREE DR. 21421 AUSUSTA CIR= FOUNTAIN VALIEY, CA 92708 HUNTINGlK N BEACH, CA 92646 i HtJNPINGICN BEACH, CA 92W, 1 i 149-201-71 149-281-10 ; 149-282.-09 WILLIAM N. VES= KENN=I G. ELLSON j ARNOLD N. CARLSON 21571 DAM I.N. 9552 PEPPc;RI71EE DR. 21422 AUGUSTA CIRCLE IIUNTINGIC7N BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGrON BEACH, CA 92646 Hr.,'N'X'INGTON BEACH, CA A � 149-201-79 149-281-11 1149-282-19 I j MILDRED A ('IANEX JACK A. VINCE RALPH J. HUTARTH j 21651 DAKJIR IN. 9562 PEPPERTREE DR. ; 21432 AUGUS`lA CIRCLE 'HUNTINGICX�IV BEACH CA 92646 HUNTINGPON BEACH, CA 92646 tiUNTrINGICN BEACH, CA 92411� � � I 149-201-80 149-281-12 3.49-282-20 ROBERT M. MUSCAT ROBERT P. JURANEK BERNARD KEWRZSC.4W S , 21431 PINLTREE IN. 9572 PEPPERTREE DR. 21431 P1N.'SACOLA CIRCLE HUrTrINGI BEACH, CA 92646 11UNTIIJGM1 DUCH, CA 92646 HUWlNGTON BEACQI, CA 92LgG s , 149-281-06 149-281-13 ! 149-282-21 I DONNA L. KEISEN DONAM F. MC PHER,ON FRANK MARTER 21441 PINETREE L'V. 9582 PEPPERTREE DR. 9612 PUPERTREE DR. �HUNTINGM BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGION BEACH, CA 92646 H(NrING7CN BEACH, CA 92646 149-201-07 149-281-14 149-283-01 R ABrRT B CO►Vl N-P ROBE:RT L. TAUDL MIC11EAL JUHASZ ( 9471 NEOLANI DR 2828 N HASKEL.L 954.1 DRUMBEAT DR. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264E DAL.LAS, TEXAS 75204 flUNTINGP)N BE,1CH, CA 92646 i 149-095-10 149-201-46 149-201-60 ERNEST R. BOFILL HAI4ILTbN PROPERTIES DAVID G. TODD 9471 ;Z 1T2jil DR. 2622 CIfdCLE DR. 9551 DRUMBEAT DR. HU.+ITINGTON BFACH, CA 92646 NUIPORT BEACII, CA 92660 IitWINGTW BEACH, CA 92646 149-095-11 149-201-54 149-201-61 LEE C. MC COW HAMILTON PROPERTIES EVERT E. DECK 9471 K80KI CIRCLE 2622 CIRCLE DR. 9561 DXWSEAT DR. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 IILWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 HUNTING"MN BEACH, CA 92646 149-095-18 149-201-55 149-201-62 OTTILIE BOLT MILTON C. OTIS MORLEY V. FRANK 9611 CLEARBROOK DR. P.O. BOX 822 9581 DRUMBEAT DR. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 ZU?JSET BFACH, CA 90742 HUNTINarw a ACN, CA 92646 149-201-35 149-2.01-56 149-201-63 i JOHN W. BOWE l JR. STE;VEN D. WALTEIR DAVID S. WIGGINS 9601 CLEAREROOK DR. 9501 DRUMBEAT DR. 9582 DRUMBEAT DR. HUNTING70N BFACH, CA 92646 HUNTING11ON BEACH, CA 92646 IIUNT'INTON BEACH, CA 92646 149-201-36 149-201-57 149-201-64 MUSE F N. MUSALLI RAYMOND F. 711OMPSCN THOMASS V. BI AZZ3EWSKI 9421 GA'I'i=,SHM DR 9521 DRUMBEAT DR. 22772 ARBELIA RD. HUNTING7W OF-ACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BFACH, CA 92646 LAGUNA NIGUII„ CA 92677 , 149-201-37 149-201-58 149-201-67 ROBERT L. TAUBE JOSEPH A. LAMOUREUX III RICHARD D. ERICKSON 782 PAULARINO AVE. 9531 DRUMBEAT DR. 9531 BORBA CIRCLE COSTA MESA, CA 92626 HUNTIW71ON BFACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTCN BEACH, CA 92646 149-2.01-46 149-201-59 149-201-68 K. A. •RL'YNOlm HAROLA GERMAN A.D. SLATER 942]. LEILANI DRIVE 9632 P-aPERTREE DR. 9622 PEPPLRTREE DR. HUNTING'TCN BEACH, CA 92646 IiUNTIN�i17lV BEACH, CA 92646 FitINTIN"'TCY.V BEACH, cA 92646 149-283-03 149-283-02 I I I I s' THE MAIL ROUTE ss e gV -7 V/eM- , 40 PRIVATE MAILBOX SERVICE _c) (714)968.1831 9568 Hamilton Ave. • P.O.Box 2712 • 1luntinrton Beach,CA 92647 October 10, 1984 Mr. Don MacAllister 1121 Park Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 12648 Dear Don: Just want you to know the concern I have over an item that will be coming up on your Monday night agenda. The item is the appeal i for a monument sign for the shopping center at the corner of Bushard and Hamilton. As you know, I have been in business over three years now in Huntington Beach and as any person in business knows, sign iden- tification is important. We here in this center especially need an identification sign because of the speed of traffic on Hamil- ton and the setback of the center with all the trees in front of it. Ken Reynolds, of Hamilton Properties has been putting alot of money into keeping our center in excellent shape and we are proud to be tenants here but Romehow, we need to let all that traffic from other parts of Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa know that we exist. Thank you for your a-tention in this matter. I Sincerely, ine Wessa r I i i i H.B. Planning Commission January 4, 1983 Page 7 allow freeway-oriented signs. 2. Another sign (Rusty Scupper) of similar dimensions, has been .approved within the same zone. 3. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Porter, Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Paone, Mirjahangir, Schumacher ABSTAIN: None A five-m;.nute recess !-is called. Commission resumed at 9:30 P.M. SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-7 Applicant: Jimmy McGee's Night Club A request to permit a freestanding pole sign 14 feet in height with an area of 40 square feet at property located at the southwest corner of Warner Avenue and Springdale Street. The public hearing was opened. Jimmy McGee, the applicant, stated he would like the sign permit granted. fie felt he had an economic hard- ship because of the location of his right club (being in a corner of a shopping center) and the fact that there is no directory sign in the center and most of the tenants were unwilling to contribute to the I expense of a directory sign. Tom Emery, a tenant of Century 21 in the same center, spoke in favor of granting the sign permit for the club, but also added that he would be willing to help pay for a directory sign. Art N;chwitz, a resident in the City and an employee for Jimmy McGee's stated that the sign was necessary for exposure of the club. The public hearing was closed. I Secretary Palin stated that a planned sign program was necessary for this shopping center and many like it along Warner Avenue, however, he f further stated that because of "piecemeal" development, this was a i situation where there are multiple owners in the center. fie was also concerned about the cluttered look of street signs. Commissioner. Liven- good agreed with Mr. Palin and stated he could not support the appli- cant' request for a special sign permit. Commissioners discussed other 1 situations like this one that had come up in the past. But in most of these situations the problem of multiple ownership did nut exist making it easier to accomplish a planned sign program in each case, The CC&R' s were considered, however, signs were not stipulated in that agreement. Commissioner consensus was that a directory sign would be the best mean: of advertising for the center. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY HIGGINS SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-7 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the 11.13. Planning Commission January 9, 1983 Page 8 ordinance code will result in substantial economic hardship. Other options are available to the applicant, including a planned sign program. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the properties in the sane zone classification as demonstrated by other commercial uses within the general area. 3. The granting of this request will constitute a special privilege because the applicant has options available that fall within the scope of the ordinance, as outlined in Finding No. 1. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter NOES: Schumacher ABSENT: Paone, Mirjahangir ' ABSTAIN: None SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-10 Applicant: Joe Banks/The Sirens & Services Compan A request to permit one £rees�-.anding pole sign and one freestanding directory sign in a shopping center located on the southwest corner of l Springdale and Edinger. Commissioners had some questions on similar projects where a building sign was already existing and a request was made for another sign. Staff stated this was for Brentwood Savings and was granted under a Conditional Exception at the time. The public hearing was opened. Joe Banks, the applicant, introduced the architect on the project to explain the remodeling of the entire center. Shrim Scrubs, stated that the center was over 2C years old and would be receiving a "face-lift". He felt that, not only the signs, but the center would also be vastly improved. lie also said the gas station on that corner would no longer be there. Commissioners ques- tioned the applicant about the existing sign in the planter. The ap- plicant explained that he had a problem with maintenance of the planter. Commissioners were curious about the existing sign identifying the Vons Market and the possibility of other tenants in the center using i the existing market sign for directory advertising. The applicant felt , that because they were the major tenant in the center that they have exclusive use of the sign identifying their market. The public hear- ing was closed. Some discussion took place regarding the landscaping in the pa;-king i lot. The applicant publicly stated that he would be. removing the old signs. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY PORTER SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-10 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: i FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Since there is an existing freestanding sign identifying the sub- AT/I-S' j_P/�•� Arry JIMMY MCGEE 'S NIGHTCLUB .; 5902 Warner Avenue Huntington Beach , CA 92649 January 1983 City Council Huntington Beach, CA Attention Council Members : We of Jimmy McGee 's Nightclub, 5902 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, are requesting an appeal on the decision passed January 4 , 1983 on special sign permit #82-7 to refuse sign by the Planning Commission . The reason for the appeal is on the basis that not all consideration for our needs was weighed before the decision was passed and we feel [ enough doubt was raised by the Planning Committee to request further E consideration and hope to have the opportunity to present this to the City Council . Thank you for your consideration. Ver truly yours , J mm c ee L I I i IN77{l; �• Superior Court ' GP TIM 1 f STATR OF CALIFORNIA In and for tti5 County of Orange 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH pll�S2t.4C l'!l33ltl�t'l.TIS•.�. CITY CLERK HEARING State of California ) CmtityofOrange )1s6 APRIL L. ELLIOTT 11tat 1 am and at all times herein mentioned was a citirrn of the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that 1 am not a party to,nor Interested in thx above entitled matter; �intKxAb t r• that f am the principal cirri of the printer of the AM!t:At. jq Ma�..,,, HUNTINGTON REACH IND. REVIEW ►a + t�:.nss r ii Itt• �t ate a �tiai.gF ,t t�ftd br t L'4►isfa et tlw Ca{,!'lnrligttrt a newspaper of general circulaliun.published in the City of , in*Guseil Cho.&, dtt�f,t:rk' • e«Itm4xtt+a st, W►c,ta►tr70 HUNTINGTON BEACH r ks we`to doutaftN� County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the rs tk+ x Ctvtefha►rt diseminstion of ie"]rews and intelligence of a general charac- tipeosl$tsn prior K6 644,a�Mti U rsttt a'tt}tre it ter,and which newspaper of all time: herein tnenti•med bud �«,�,,d+s•attKch�att7J{+MwArr ind still has a l><tna fide euf+scriptiun list of paying aulrerihen, KO ri"t rie ut°�{ v&16, tr.t,ty ratty ft 1r/ and which newspaper has Ian established,printed and pub- a,.•tik'%1%u►o}uts.retrw.�+c. ►t. fished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a r4n-. , t�'" " 't•' period exceedinr one year. that the notice, of which the "'� 4o+rp�4a+M �`�{a 1tw► llrmeuea d tm�1r4ytr+v'teet tbnfarC!S; annexed la a printed copy,has been published in the r.•gular .et 0 UtTOW »ari star w>; and:utire issuc of said nntepeper,and nut in any supp.emert r iOl to t r q y� ther.wt,on the followirtg dates,to wit �`t •. �•�,+.e a�r.�r•.t�,. �w ll In.n rile UeAn ce►4s�� Ctrs.1Ci70 am 42 .Htun turw4 ttsrtla� 41w«1�.,(fi�!' ' r�..a '•t1ttU .ir {.vt 1TVtoyTll t`t!17t11JBtJtCt1'l J A N U A R Y 5, 1964 1{r H.tt tnaeeta! i s N+mt tl+xitvl.Ret•'rY5t7r?. �.i.•, I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjuty that the furero- ing Is true and vtrect. Dated at.....GARDEN GROVE �A C•aliforniatlrf ... 6 t.gsy of .. J AN-19.. 84.. ..� Signr�turc .................. t Form No.POP 92092 l a CITY OF HL.ai'MJ'"t"ING'i ON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK January 19, 1984 I . McDonald's Corporation 1U960 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 600 i Los Angeles, CA 90024 Attn: Linda Clapp - Constructicit Engineer Tho City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, January 16, 1984 approved your request to withdraw the appeal you filed regarding Special Sign permit #63••5. If you have any questions, please contact the Development Services Department - 536-5271. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMIJ:CII:jn I ITrlrnhrnr: 714.ri.16 5227) r • / 1 I 1 � . 4 � r • January 5, 1984 City Clark City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 711 Huntington Beach, CA Re: McDonald's Restaurant 6561 Edinger Avenue Huntington Beach, CA Withdraw appeal for SSP#83-5 Dear City Clerk: On behalf of McDonald's, I would like to withdraw the appeal that was submitted on 12-23-83 regarding Special Sign Permit No. 83-5. I arclogize for any in,-.onvenience this matter has created for you and the City of Huntington Beach. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, Mct)ONALD'S CO RATION fl� J�t �, OtidrClapp uction Engineer Los Angeles Region cc: Ca-ale Balunani Mike Roulton Larry [lodge John Ramsey OL-0-1 McDonald's Corporation• 100.60 Wili►hiro Bou!orard•Suite 600•Los Angnlat. California f9,'1024.3766.213/477.2961 HELPING OLYMPIC DREAMS COME TRUE i l I. . "t t j ej 4 J'anaary 5, 1904 i City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P.O. Dox 711 j Huntington Beach, CA 1 ?.e: McDonald's Restaurant 6561 Edinger Avenue Huntington Beach, CA Withdraw appeal for SSP#83-5 Dear City Clerk: r On behalf of McDonald's, I would like to withdraw the appeal that was submitted on 12-23-83 regarding Spe'--ial Sign Pfrnit No. 83-5. I apologize for any inconvenience this matter has created for you and the city of Huntington Beach. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, l MCDONhlLD IS,, CO RATION d Clapp Con truction Engineer Los Angeles Region cc: Carole Bahmani Mike Boulton Larry Hodge Jdhn Ramsey 0- 0 I : McDonald's Corporation• 10960 Wilshire Boulevar:f -Suite 600 a Log Angeles, California 90024.3786.213/471-2961 HELPING OLYMPIC DREAMS COME TRUE \:.,�1. . 1 mot. ..P.. . .. .. . ..., ......-... .... .. • • .. • .. .•.. •.... .i _.1.... .... .. - .n a .. � Z92f . December City of Huntington Beach I( Planning Commission 1 1 Honorable I'lanning Commission Members: We wish to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission. We feel we have an undue hardship created by the position of the existing sign of George 's Mexican Food. We are asking to move our sign 33 feet to the west in order for it to be clearly visible to traffic along Edinger. If our sign is so positioned it will fall between the George 's Mexican food sign and the Kentucky Fried Chicken sign allowing each 'business to have clear visibility from the street. Although we recognize the desirability of a monument sign, the number of ingress and egress points clearly prevent us from using this device. A monument sign placed at the midpoint of the McDonald 's lot wot:! •; obscure traffic visibility for cars exiting the McDonald 's lot. This would increase the number of traffic accidents and increase the liabil:.ty of McDonald 's Corporation. Ptacing a monument sign at the western side of the lot would create similar problems for the liquor store. Therefore, this is not a viable option for the company . We therefore request, the variance asked fur originally. Thank you for your time and consideration . Sincerely, McDONALD 15 CORPORATION Linda Linda Clapp Construction Engineer Los Angeles Region i cmm/1366C r� Mcpona!d's Corporation• 10960 Wilshire 9oulevaru -Suite 600• Los Angnle3, California 90024.3786.213/477-2961 HELPING OLYMPIC DREAMS COME TRUE Publish 1/5/84 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMM SSION DENIAL SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 983-5 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber cf the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday, the ! 16th day of January � 1984 for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No, 83-5, a request to permit a 100 square foot freestanding sign located on the north side of Edinger Avenue approximately 210 feet east of Edwards Street, to identify an existing MacDonGld's restaurant as a drive-through facility. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. 1 i ` All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said Spe,7ial Sign Permit No. 83--5 Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach. California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED IZ/21183 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth MCity Clerk r Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 926A8 Date: December 14, 1983 NarICE OF ACTION Applicant: mcDonald's Corporation c/o John Ramsey Subject: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 83-5 Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission on December 13, 1983 and your request was : Withdrawn Approved Approved with Conditions (See Attached) Disapproved XX (See attached) Tabled i Continued until Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach ordinance Code, the action taken by the Planning Commission in final unless an appeal is filed to the City Council by you or an interested party. Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved. Said appeal must be accompanied by a filing fee of one hundred and sixty-five ($165 ) dollars and be submitted to the City Clerk 's office within ten ( 10) days of the date of the Commission 's action. i In your case$ the last day for filing an appealand paying the filing i fee is December 23. 1983 Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Coda are such that any application becomes null and void one ( 1 ) yettz after final approval, unless actual construction has started. Very truly yours, .James W. Palin, Secretary L IL Huntington Beach Planning Commission ► ` 11 P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92548 / L December 14 , 1983 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 83-5 APPLICANT: McDonald 's Corporation c/o John Ramsey 10960 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 600 Los Angeles, California REQUEST: To permit a 100 square foot freestanding LOCATION: North of Edinger Avenue, approximately 250 -- feet east of Edwards Street. DATE OF DENIAL: December 13, 1983 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The granting of a special sign permit for the subject property will constitute the granting of a special privilege because the proposed sign may be located within an area of the subject pro- perty that will not create traffic visibility problems and will comply with all aspects of the sign code. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance code will result in a substantial hardship. iden- tification for the existing restaurant can be accomplished by the use of wall signs and locating a conforming sign within the central landscape planter of the subject property. I hereby certify that Special Sign Permit No. 83-5 was denied by the planning Commission of the City of Huntington ©each on Tuesday, December 13 , 1983, upon the foregoing citations. Very truly yours, oil James W. Palin, Secretary jlm 1 -• .18•DEGUISE f -a• - NEW in t59b1 wICKLOW LN v :► f HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Aftsummum . m----- - - --- ig u•0153198348 12/14/83 IC3 IPMRNCY C30 LEAS 71u8939252 MGM TDRN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA AS 12-14 1261P EST P MCDONALD CORP _ CARE JOHN RAMSEY 10960 *ILSMIRE BLVD SUITE 600 LOS ANGELES CA 90024 I. DEAR StRe IN REGARD TO SPECIkL SIGNED PERMIT 063+5 IN HUNTINGTON BEACH, PLANNING COMMISSION REJECYED SIGN PERMIT, RECOMMENDED A LOW PROFILE MONUMENT SIGN, 24 FAMILIES WHO HAVE SIGNED A PETITION AGAINST A i0 FOOT HIGH RED SIGN IN THEIR BEDROOM WINDOWS AGREE, PLEASE GO WITH MONUMENT SIGN AND SHOW GOOD PUBLIC RELATIONS WITH YDUA NEIGHBORS AS GAS STATIONS IN HUNTINGTON BEACH AREA ARE NOW DOING, CONCERNED HOMEOWNER 80d DEGUISE 12=02 EST MGMCt1HP i f NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 83--5 TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: December 28, 1983 FROM: Dept. of Development Services PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FUR THE 16 th DAY OF T, ,,,nuary , 1983• AP's are attached 1�r AP's will follow No AP's Initiated toy: Planning Comminsion Planning Department Petition * Appeal X Other ` X (Exempt) Adoption of Enviromnental Status (x) `` YES NO !i Refer to Mike Adams Planning Department - Extension 0 5277 for additional information. * If appeal , please transmit exact warding; to he required in the legal . CMS 83-306 145-313-01 145-313-02 145-313-03 Ramon R. Caudillo John U,.-ards Robert lh&ins 6502 Clare Drive 6522 Clare Drive 6532 Clare Drive Huntington: Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 145-313-04 145-313-05 145-313-06 Church, Rector Church Elardens & Roger V. Barras Jaime A. Cabacunen Vestry of All Saints Pasadena 6562 Clare Drive 6561 Limerick Drive 1176 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Irvine, CA 92714 145-313-07 145-313-08 145-313-09 Thomas J. Marlin Pat.-rick L.Bennett Penny Williamson 16095 1•tesquite Cir. 6531 Limerick Drive 6521 Limerick Drive Fountain Valley, CA 92703 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 lluntir�;ton Beach, CA 92647 145-313-10 145-31.3-11 145-313-12 George B. Verek Ken Turlis Barry Sexton 6501 Limerick Drive 6502 Limerick Drive 16392 11aruffa Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 145-313-13 145-313-14 145-313-15 Alexander I.o ez Brian J. tbore et al John Linde 6532 Limerick Drive 6552 Limerick Drive 6562 Limerick Drive Ikmti.ngton Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 145-313-16 145-313-17 145-313-13 Carl T. PIeadcnas Dennis Andersen Floriza Wessman 6572 Lin•,�erick Drive 16071 Marj an Lane 6592 Limerick Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 145-313-20 145-313-22 145-313-24 Jolm A. Hardy III, et al, Tr. t1argaret V. Bunt Ysidora Cole Anthony Ind. Inc. 4226 West Fifth St. 10433 Wilshire Blvd. , Apt.803 6501 Edinger Ave. Santa Ana, CA 92703 Los Angeles, CA 90024 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 145-313-25 145-313-26 145-313-27 Ysidora Cole Jorge Ulloa Franchise Realty;Interstate � 10433 Wilshire Blvd. , #808 17795 Joshua Cir. Corp; McDonalds 186/04 l,os Angeles, CA 90024 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 P.O. Box 66207/At•iF O'Hare Chicago, IL 6066G 145-311-13 145-311-14 145-311-15 Johann Assigal Allen A. Quinn Nancy C. Wise 15882 1Lllow Lane 6601 Limerick Drive 6591 Limerick Drive llumtington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 f • GIS 83-306 145-282-15 145-232•-16 145-282-26 'James B. Sullivan E&ard I;alac Robert J. Palermo 6472 Langford Cir. 6462 Longford Cir. 6441 Cavan Cir. j. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 E 145-282-27 145-282-28 145-232-29 Wayne R. Nicholls Jeffrey Padden Philip H. Yockey 6461 Cavan Cir. 64471 Cavan Cir. 6472 Cavan Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntinyton Beach, CA 92647 145-282-30 145-282-31 145-282-32 Rex Resurreccion John C. Keyes Ross E. Hastings 6462 Cavan Cir. 6442 Cavan Cir, 6432 Cavan Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 145-282-40 145-282-42 145-282-43 Leo P. Douglas Martin Burns Martin Burns 10611 Douglass Road 24910 John Fremont Road 24910 John Fremont Road Anaheim, CA 92806 hidden Dtills, CA 91302 Hidden Hills, CA 91.302 145-115-21 145-115-22 145-115-23 Leonard D. Samuels Clinton Bradshaw Don Peterka 15902 Wicklow Lane 15912 Wicklow Lane 15922 Wicklow Lame Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 145-115-24 145-115-25 145-1.15-26 Miehio Ota Robert N. Johansen Milton F. Damerow 15932 t-licklcw Lane 14141 Sawston Cir. 15962 Wicklow Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Nostminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 145-115-27 145-115-28 145-115-29 Edwin C. Collins Donna M. Nichols Robert M, DeGuise 15972 Wicklow Lane 15971 Wicklow Lane 15961 Wicklow Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 145-115-30 145-115-31 145-115-32 Betty Liles Gerald Collins Janet S. Roberts 15951 Wicklow Lane 15931 Wicklmo lane 15921 Wicklow Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 }kmtington Beach, CA 92647 }kmtington Bench, CA 92647 145-116-13 145-116-14 Janet Bartells John 0. Hagan 15881 Wickla4 Gane 6611 Limerick Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, (:A 92647 • a-S 83-306 I , 146-361-05 146-361-06 146-361-O8 ? 'Philip Scuka Marlene B. I Soronry William J. Iles t 5162 Vallecito Ave. 6611 Waton Drive 6601 Waton Drive �. Westminister, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 146-361-09 146-361-10 146-361-11 John Mahler Jackson Hendrick Lillian Andre 6581 Waton Drive 6571 Waton Drive 6551 Waton Drive j Iuntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 i 146-361-12 146-361-13 146-361-14 Albert Ruiz, Jr, Burris Corp. Charles Arney E 6541 Waton Drive Union Oil of Calif. , Prop. Tax 16031 Giarc Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 P.O. Box 7600 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Los Angeles, CA 90054 1.46-361-15 146-361-16 146-361-17 Thattas J. Silva Gary W. Hunt, et al Edwin J. Butler 6541 Doriane Cir. 6531 Doriane Cir. 6521 Wriane Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Leach, CA 92647 146-362-01 146-362-21 W;'lma McZuaid Vince-it Sabbatino 16042 Giarc Lane 16062 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 1 CMS(83-306) 14423 Sylvan Street Van Nuys, CA 91401 I ld 4cDoYia 's Corp. c/o Linda Clapp 10960 Wilshire Blvd. , J'600 Los Angeles, CA 90024 f ' / ` �. CITY OF HI.JNTII' GTON BEACH 20W MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK February 81 1983 Target Stores,' Division of Dayton-Hudson Corp. 777 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minn. 55440 Attn: Terry F. Jacobs, Site Planner The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, February 7, 1983, overruled the Planning Commission and granted your appeal relative to Special Sign Permit 082-8 subject to a five year amoritization period. Please contact the Development Services Department for further information - (714) 536-5271. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk MIW:CD:bt it 1 tl f i (TN.phon.:714-63 6-62271 I i I' t 6 LL�W Publish Publish 1/27/83 ' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING I APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIrN PERMIT 82-7 NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 7th day of February , ly 83 . for the purpose of considering an appeal to the denial by the Planning Commission of Specfal Special Sign Permit No. 62-7, a request to permit a free-standing pole sign with a height of 14 feet and an area of 40 square feet to be located approximately 400 feet east of Springdale Street along the north side of Warner Avenue in the C4 (Highway Commercial District). (5902 Warner Ave. ) lA legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. I i All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said _ appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach. California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED 1/19/83 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk NOTICE TO //CLERK TO SCHEDUIX PUBLIC HEARING i ITEM TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: P4 '.:1z(—r PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE DAY OF �►��`1 �' I�„J� AP's are attached AP's will follow No AP's I Initiated by: Planning Cotmission Planning Department Petition ` * Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x`, YES Refer to Planning Department - Extension #-gg-S~6 for additional information. * If appeal , please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal. I OJ LEGAL NOTICE G(tl NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING �i. C K Special Sign Permit No. 82-7 n PP��L- VS1700 D-7 \ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the atmt of the City of Hui tin ea ?ly��, �,,,,_, . California, for the purpose of considering 6!"36h�cia Sign Permit No. 82-7, a request to permit a free-standing polp sign with a height j of 14 feet and an area of 40 square feet to be located approximately 400 feet east of Springdale Street along the north side of Warner Avenue in the C4 (Highway Commercial District) . A legal description Y is on file in the Department of Development Services. i t ' a Said�hearing will be held at the hour of 7:q0 P.M. , on 1 3 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Special sign Permit No. 82-7 APPPe4L ` Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 ,Sm L/lyy 14 3 DATED this day of CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary _ i I I Jimmy W. MoSeeIs 146-312-15 5902 Warner Avenue Dan ' Hyska Huntington Beach, Calff. Special Sian Permit 82-7 5792 View Circle 92649 October 26, 1982 (M) Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 110-301-13 146-312-16 Chen Can Chin Peter F Guild William K Emerich 2nd 3835 14imtral Drive 17141 Treehaven Lane 5772 View Circle Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 110-301-06 110-301-32 146-312-19 Richard L Marsel.l Hurt-is Corp Faxyl E Jacobs 6051 Sunnerdale Drive Union oil Co of Calif 16962 Lakk Lan. Huntington beiach, Calif Property 'Tax Division Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 P.O. Box 7600 92649 110-301-07 Los Angeles, Calif 146-312-20 Robert Lee Clinton 90051 Richard H Woad 6031 Surmerdale Drive 5802 View Circle Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92649 110-301-08 110-301-33 146-313-08 James D Lewis Geratd E Sparks Atlantic Richfield Cb. 6021 :?u rexdale Drive F.O. BOX 1921 P.O. Sax 2679 Tu m Annex Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Deach, C ilif Los Angales, G+Lif 92647 92647 90051 110-301-09 110-301 07 146-313--09 Arthur Ayvazian Richard Mura"natsu Evans Kitaigianis 17101 Treehav+en Lane 6032 Sutmerdale Drive 9224 BLook,shire Avenue Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif DMW Calif 92647 92647 90240 110-301-10 146-171-12 146-313-U Eugene E Smith Sea Aira West John E Schartz 1.7111 Tr eehaven Lane c% 0 Graham b Sons 70 Glca = Avenue Huntington Haach, Calif 32661 :ea Island Drive Belmont Shores, Cali 92647 laqtm Niguel, Calif 92677 90803 110-301-11 146-171-13 163-071-10 Edward7D Cbxven Lam Stephen V Andrews Joseph L Pert Jr j 17121 20525 S Wood Avenue 5811 Braman Drive Huntington Deach. Calif 7burrance:, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 90503 92649 UO-301-12 146-312-13 163-071-11 Yoahihiro B Kacwauchi ire C. Hiltunen Pobin G Scates 17131 7Yeehavenn Lane 5821 Viva C.irc:le 5821 Flran nen Drive Huntington Deach, Calif Huntington tkMcn, Calif Huntincltoci Beach, Calif 92647 92649 92649 163-071-12 163--080-12 James L BLnrdngham Special Sign Permit 82-7 Sail J Sills 5831 Brannen Drive Octd:)er 26, 1982 (JH) 838 N Doheny Drive Huntington Beach. Calif 92649 Los Angeles, CaIif 900 69 163-071-13 163-071-21 163-080-14 Altde R Gross Paternoo L Evangelista Sa t1 west Savings & Loan Ass 5,41 Prannen Drive 5931 Brannen Drive 2700 W Manchester Blvd. H=tington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92699 92649 �a'+�, Calif 90305 163-071-14 163-071-22 Frances Robinson 163-091-09 William W Duwlam Jr Charles R 5851 Hrannen DriveNorthrup5941 8tannert Brive 5781 Huntirx3ton Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Rogers Drive 92649 92649 Huntington lkr ach, Calif 92649 163-071-15 163-071-23 Bretton J Nbhar Jr Roger W n 163-091-10 5861 Bramen Drive �y J Miller Huntington Beach, Calif Hunti5961 ngtmBraman Drive 5791 Poga�rs Drive 92649 92649 x3trn Beach, Calif Huntin;ton Beach, Calif 92b49 92649 163-071-16 163-080-02 Julian R Flores Jr 163-091-U 5871 Bra man Drive cVoJohn H Horner Thmm W Straw Huntington Beach, Calif 929 William Lyon Via Lido 5792 Rogers Drive 92649 New rt Beach, CalifCa Huntington Beach, Calif RHM 92653 92649 163-071-17 163-080-03 Louis E Bohl C C Dutton 1 5881 Bra �en Drtkve 9940 Westwanda Drive Gerald T Ch ml rive D Huntington Beach, Calif Beverly Hills, Calif 5782 ftngere Drive 92649 Huntington Beach, Calif 40210 92649 163-07 -1 18 163-080-04 163-091-13 Wi 11iam P Prince William Lyon and Associates Nictlolae A Iavendittt 5891 Brannan Derive 19 Corporate Plaza 5762 Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Newport Beach, Calif 5762i Rog Beach, Calif 92649 926Ei0 92649 163-071.--19 163-080-08 Emil Sokiedw et al 163-091-200 Sanuel Elst:er et al J Lotcas 5901 Brannan Drive 28087 Dille Valdes Maul Raul Harbor Blvd. Huntington Beach, Calif Mission Viejo, Calif 12553 Ciardcn Croce, Calif 92675 92640 163--071-20 163--080-10 163-091-21 Gilbert G D..ri 5921 Braman Cheri-Chin Chen Roy W Meda err Huntington I3ea�eh ve caiff.. 3835 Mistral Drive 5781 Whistler Circle 92647 Flultington Be-zch, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif � 92649 92649 163--091-22 Troy lnvestmc�-t Group Four Special Sign Permit 82-7 C/o Troy 110ai y October 26, 1982 (JH) 5885 Warner AvvAM HuntincItan Beach, lalif 92649 163--091-23 Robert r Seaburn 5752 Whistler Circle Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 f //t, PUBLIC NEARING - APPEAL TO PC DENIAL OF SS P 82-7 - CONTINUED TO 3 7 83 The City Council at reeting held February 7, 1983 continued to 3/7/83 a hearing for the purpose of considering an appeal to the denial by publicg2_7� a request to permit the Planning Coemission of Special Sign Permit No. a free-standing pole sign with a height of 14 feet and an area of 40 square feet tQ be located approximately 400 feet east of Springdale Street along the north side of Warner Avenue in the C4 (Highway Commercial District). (5902 darner Avenue) Dated: February 14, 1983 Alicia M. Wentworth — city Clerk7an ex-o of the City Council of the City { of Huntington Beach, California I 4Y i i • i { i CITY OF �-lu►PJTIIYGT Iry BEACH 2000 WAIN STREET .i OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CALIFORNIA 92648 1 I t 1 I ? March 9, 1983 f' JimnY McGee's Nightclub 5092 Warner Ave. �i Huntington Beach, Ca. 92548 1 I 1 •The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at i.ts regular meeting held Monday, ,SMarch 2, 1983 granted your request to wfth- draw Your Permit # 82 - 7. Please contact the Development Services Deparment if 1 any questions. you. have 1, Alicia M. Wentworth ` City Clerk AtIM:Ce:bt r ITallPhonr 714-536.52271 AIM i 7 f JJII IN711L� � ���III/// Vf•� J t. Superior Court r(1 p14#�4faa'v s or nix J'O'P-l Fa,+ -WA TEOFCAI.IFORNIA / t) J In and for the County of Orange 1 s�iioiA,t�7rwlr/.0.= I t CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - �MEUBLIr��oN CITY CLERK PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE 82-8 State of California ) County of orange )ss APRIL L. ELLIOTT That I am and at all times herein mentioned r•iu a citizen of the United Stater,over the axe of twenty-one years,and that 1 wed 'tp� am not a party to,nor interuted In the above entitled matter, is I that I am the principal clerk of the printercf the t, .�asoot n HUNTINGTON BEACH INII. REVIEW the 9lt, AM is so a newspaper of general circulation,published in the Citv of Aim i� pf�K�erat 010 HUIVTING7014 BEACH t99 Nrwft+50 ►f* stls st County of Orange and which arw•spaper is publi,.htd for the +fit AMsrAsa disemination of local news and intelligence of a general chs-sr• k ter,seal which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had A y.( ; and still has a bona fide subscrirtion list of paying subscribers, ,,, and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub• 661W le lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a period exceeding one year. that the notice, of which the MAIN annexed is a printed copy,his been published in the nXular tkrM. 1�Uus end entire Issue of said newslrsper,and not in any supplement , 1 thereof,on the following date,to wit , Ifyc,I�► ::µ t JANUARY 271 1983 f I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury llut the forego- Ing Is true and cortcct. _ Dated at........GARDEN GROVE...................... ; California,this 28th dsyot JaNt 19. 83 r �,IfnatUre ................ 7 l S. { i ��r I Form No.POP 92082 I REQUES-1- FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION r Date January 26, 1983 1 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVE!) c Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato .�...... .... .. Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director of Developmen Services Subject: SP:sCIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-8 (APPEAL) Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Altemative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is Special Sign Permit No. 82-8, an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a request to permit a remodel of two existing freestanding pole signs; ne at 50 feet in height and the other at 45 feet in height. Each freestanding sign will have an area of 196 square feet (at the December 21, 1982 Plan- theg196 sivarenfoottsign vs. thelorig original nt request of sed the ign area to reflect 225 square feet) . 9 i RECOMMENDATION: The Planning commission and the planning staff recommend that the City Council uphold the denial of Special Sign Permit No. 82-8 with the findings outlined in the December 21, 1982 Planning Commission staff. report. ANALYSIS: Applicant: Target Stores, Division of Dayton-Hudson Corp. 777 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Appellant: Same as above Request: To permit the remodel of two existing free— standing pole signs, one at 50 feet in height and the other at 45 feet in height, each having an area of 196 square feet (14 x 14) . Location: The subject property is located on the south- west cDrner of Adams Avenue and Brookhurst Street Planning Commission Action on January 4, 1983: ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER SPECIAL SIGN PERMTIP NO. 82-8 WAS DENIED W'TH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: PIO 4131 .t SSP '82-8 (Appeal) ,'January 26, 1983 Page 2 F11DINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance code will result in a substantial economic hardship. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the properties in the same zone classifications as demonstrated by other commercial uses within the area. 3. Granting of this request would constitute a grant of special privi- lege because the signs have been fully amortized in accordance with Section 9760.46 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4. The en.sting signs are out of scale with the rest of the signs in the general area, and properly placed monument signs would provide proper identification along both Adams Avenue and Rrookhurst Street and the building area will be allavd maxim=wall signs under Article 976. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Paone, Miriahangir ABSTAIN: None ` It should also be noted prior to the vote that Commissioner Livengood stated that he would change his vote to deny in order to render a decision which would allow the applicant to appeal to the City Council. The possibility of denying the sign permit was discussed in regard to whether the applicant's cost savings should be determined by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Porter felt that since the applicant was stating economic hardship as the reason for the request his cost saving was &pplicable to the discussion. Commissioner Schumacher stated that if the request was approved this could start a precedent. DISCUSSION: Special Sign Permit No. 82-8 is a request to remodel two existing freestanding pole signs; one 50 feet in height along the Adams Avenue I , frontage and one 45 feet in height along the Brookhrirst Street frontage. The signs were originally erected in 1970 to identify Two Guys depart- ment store and have remained onsite through various changes in occu- pancy (lastly, FedMart) . In the past, the ordinance code permitted a freestanding pole sign to be erected at a height of 50 feet. Even ii though the height of each sign is to remain as is, the sign area of it each sign is proposed to be reduced by 104 square feet from the origiral area of 300 square feet, to accommodate the Target Store design. The current ordinance code restricts freestanding signs which are set back less than 12 feet from the ultimate right-of-way to a maximum height of 20 feet. The maximum sign area for freestanding signs is calculated at one square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of site frontage, not to exceed 100 square feet. As previously stated, the -*SSP 82-2 (Appeal) January 26, 1983 Page 3 proposed signs are 45 and 50 feet in height with an area of 196 square feet each. Staff's analysis of the site after a field survey of the general loca- tion indicates that a sign heiqht greater than the ccde-permitted 20 i feet is unwarranted. The site lends itself to a low profile monument S sign which would afford adequate visibility. The signs, as they stand today, are out of scale with the other signs in the immediate vicinity. The applicant's request to maintain the two existing freestanding signs would perpetuate nonconforming signing at a major shopping center within the City. The difference between the applicant's proposal to maintain ( a 50 foot high sign and the maximum standard of 20 feet set forth .in the sign code is significant. If the applicant had simply requested a change of copy for the existing two pole signs, an Administrative Action application would have been processed by staff with a recommendation to allow the signs to remain for a period of 2 years. This would have provided the applicant with the necessary time to amortize the cost of the signs. Even though the (staff concurs that the applicant can comply with the findings relating to detriment of property, adverse effect on other signs in the area, and possible obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic stated in Section 9760.44 of the ordinance code, there are no indications that a substantial economic hardship exists. Staff analysis indicates that there are no exceptional, extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicably: to the land, buildings, or premises to prevent the site from being identified, as outlined in Section 9760.7 of the ordinance code. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to Section 15105, Class 5, of the California Environmental I Quality Act, the subject request is categorically exempt. FUNDING SOURCE: i Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may overturn the Planning Commission's denial and approve Special Sign Permit No. 82-8 with findings. -OR- The City Council may also consider overturning the Planning Conunission denial and allowing the requested modification to the existing signs, however, requiring the subject signs be brought into conformance with the provisions of Article 976 within two years. f i • SSP 82-2 (Appeal) January 261 1983 Page 4 i SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Staff Report dated December 21, 1982 with attachments 2. Planning Commission minutes dated December 21, 1982 & January 4, 1983 3. Letter of Appeal JWP:HZ:df f i i Fil R2 ;� rf RI ° s iIII • - - �' . I t17 I111 trs Rl •as 03 as s •� - = R1 II Rl RI Rl 1 i As, as it•f r ■: �'• :t i s ' 7 •s: • .su. - t 1 _ c>: 3 (� ' Rl no 1 ,•S� •f .•]j• •r- -w - R3 RS'I R2 ; _RI. f •7' AS As 1 1'1 �k• ._�, ....-..Y� N -•J t' 'y li I •��iS •3 �4Pit q Sol Sl ACAMS C4 f Rl l•t l at r Rl Rl R: RI tat ! j it Rl zi Y • -•^--r.• Jai_-� 1 , � r'`•.✓'� t Rt I �_� if C��f .'�"• �_ RlRi AI Rl RI t RI la Rl _ 1 iJ � 1 � 3 1 �_ �O •~ �y I t.z F CF-E ' 1 r.RI :f Rl 71 : I __ •. IRl , .i : 11! r Rl vt RI i3� R1 1 Al �--J� le T . R! '.;'R.1 !-=R�� IA1,'1 Rl "I at 'f� Rl •1 Rt t. Rt °j , Al. r.•-�r-K'ti- • r R at CF-R.Ap i LIM ! HUwll�101y 114Clf HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING' DIVISION f i INTHE Superior Court arTHE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CLERK — pBS�E4FPYA;�iCel,Ttont, ,•W• PUBLIC HEARING 82-7 Stataorcalifornia ) CountyofOrange )u• N ' APRIL L. ELLIOTT phi "K!` 4� 'i'hat I am and at aU times herein mentioned was a citiren of the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I fry am nut a patty to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; 1r that 1 am the principal cleric of the printer of alb. HUNTINGTON EEACH IND. REVIEW► " wNret rr p,lt a newspaper of=erwral circulation,published in the City of � �s1c6 s HUNTINGTON BEACH County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac• h /� �rssrwse� or w'a!' ter,and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fade subscription list of paying subscribers, /tnd which newspaper has been established,printed and pub- dM 1(shed at regular intervals in the said Cap.- y or Orange fora ilMlwla period exceeding one year, that th,, MUM of which the anne=ed is a printed copy,has been published in the regular and entire roue of said newspaper,and not in any supplementK thereof,oo the following dates,;o wit: rtt JAN.. 271 1983 '} I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the fortgo- Ing it true and correct bated at.. ......C' PJ EN GROVE..................... California,et 28th JAN 83 day of .........19........ ��................ Signature Form No.Pop 82M .141uy y.M � ..emu.. •y� REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date January 26 , 1983 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administratorco( lam' Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director of Development Services ►•+ Subject: 8 SPECIAL, SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-7 (APPEAL) + Stste t of Issue, FlWommentlation,Analysis, Funding Sourer, Altemative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is Special appeal p cial Sign Pe _pp al of the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign NPermit 782-7, a request to construct a freestanding pole sign 14 feet in height with an area of 40 square feet to be located in an existing shopping center west of Springdale Street along the south side o€ g Warner Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and the Planning staff recommend that the City Council uphold the Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 82-7 with the findings outlined in the January 4, 1983 Planning Commission staff report. ANALYSIS: Appellant: Jimmy McGee's Nightclub 5902~ • Warner Avenue Huntington Beach, California 92645 Applicant: Same as above Re nest: To permit a freestandin height with an area of 4 p ole g 0squarefeet n 14 feet in Location: Subject property is located at the southwest L corner of Warner Avenue and Springdale Street ' 4 Planning Commission Action on JanuaEX 4, 1983.- ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY HIGGINS SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO _• 82-7 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: t 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the y ordinance code will result in a substantial economic hardshi options are available to the e aPpicant in cludi P• Other n 9 a planned sign rio•gat s SSP 82=7 (Appeal) January 10, 1983 Page 2 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the properties in the same zone classification, as demonstrates by other commercial uses within the general area. 3. The granting of this request would constitute a special privilege because the applicant has options available that fall within the scope of the ordinance, as outlined in Findinq No. 1. AYES: Livengood, Higgins, 11inchell, Porter NOES: Schumacher ABSENT: Panne, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None DISCUSSION: Special Sign Permit No. 82-7 is a request to erect a freestanding pole sign 14 feet in height with a sign area of 40 square feet along the south side of Warner Avenue (as indicated on the attached site Plan) approxi- mately 380 feet west of Springdale Street. Currently the shopping center has anumber of pole signs located along the Warner, Avenue frontage to identify the businesses within the center. Specifically, along Warne_ Avenue there are three legal, freestanding pole signs advertising: The Weinerschnitzel, Del Taco, and Thriftimart; the latter sign was approved through a special sign permit by the Planning Commission in November of 1978. In addition to the aforementioned freestanding signs, there are two existing temporary pole signs (Century 21 Realty, Pizza Restaurant) which, research indicates, fail to have building permits. These busi- nesses have been cited by the land une division for their illegal signs. The addition of yet another freestanding sign would be a conflict with the following provision of the ordinance code: Section 9760. 7 requires that only "one freestanding sign per street frontage shall be permitted. " The proposed sign would be the sixth freestanding sign along the Warner Avenue frontage. In the past, the sign code allowed one freestanding_ sign for each freestanding building (which explains the existence of the Del Taco and The Weinerschnitzel signs) . This practice proved to be un- desirable and was removed from the ordinance cote because of th abundance of freestanding signs which appeared throughout the City in multi-building centers. It should also be noted that Jimmy McGee's Nightclub is located on a separate parcel within the shopping center; however, the ordinance code considers the site as an integrated shopping center because all parcels are serviced by common accessways, driveways, parking, and land- scaping. In conclusion, based on the above analysis and in keeping with the past actions of the Planning Commission, the staff and the Commission are recommending that the City Council uphold the denial of Sepcial Sign Permit No. 82-7. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to Section 15105, Class 5, of the California Environmental Quality Act, the subject request is categorically exempt. A � II r . r SSP 82-7 January 10, 1983 Page 3 FUNDING SOURCE: None required. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may overturn the Planning Commission's denial ani approve Special Sign Permit No. 82-7 with findings. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Site Plan 2. Elevation 3. Area Map 4. Letter of Appeal from applicant 5• Staff Report (P.C.) dated Jan. 4, 1983 6. P.C. Minutes Dated Jan. 4, 1983 JWP:HZ:df Ii i i1 li l I i 1 t - . ~ROS-01 k I � t+ c• ou• rr rzt 4.t• ^j Rt ' J ' R1coR1 R1 LR o o Yks • C c c o RI ROS Rl RR4 MH SIGN Ca RI R3 } ' Ca C? R3 'I+i I 41S +{ J, • R3 U k• •• A I R1 RI RI r Rt e RZ *..w'^� •.• .' R: RI R1 ' Rt 1 j ! �j . 1t `! P.1 _ Rt �.c F-RRtRI � , CF_E "'"': �— A RI RI PI —.� '-,�, I`• ; rr•{ a /j, S R I R I ;y Rf I• !� Cr I 1 RI �«Js :71 l` '{ ` • ,1 i i s ili:ara n.roar lll__- 1v R1 1 Rl RI e ••—• RI RI 1 RI RI R ...1'1"r1.t'�t».�. ✓"n� ✓ �••.� RI RI P.1 RI RI R1 � kl ---� i I RI RI '. C F--E i I — R I _ �.�.tR 6 j RI r...._. fill ,I cotS RI RI RI RI R1 Rf _ RI �� RI L Li Rij RI Rt a RI Fo— .n M••.• Ali � • ������' S t IrtrvteMcTOM Scxx f HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION fl I! JIMMY MCGEE'S NIGHTCLUB 5902 Warner Ave. , Huntington Beach, CA 92649 714/840-6118 24 February 1903 rn C: The Honorable Mayor Mandic , Jr. � And The City Council CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ? Office Of The City Clerk 2000 Main Street =y Huntington Beach , CA I i Attn: City Clerk Alicia M. Wentworth i '! Thank you very much for the continuance on eign permit #82-7 to March 7, 1983. The reason for this request was to follow through with staff recommendation #6 on February 7 , 1983, to work with the property owner and pursue a multi-listing sign. li With the patience of the staff , Planning Commission, and City Council, we at JIMMY MCGEE'S NIGHTCLUB wish at this time to withdraw our appeal #82-7 in order that we may submit plans to the Planning Commission in agreement with the property owner and businessmen of "Old West Center" for a multi-listing sign as recommended. Thank you for the time and directional advice of the city. Sincerely, JIMN MCGEE'S NIGHTCLUB ,(I, immy McGee JWM: V" 1 i, CITY OF HUNTING'T ON BEACH r+- 4 20W MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I February 8, 1983 Jiang McGee's Nightclub 5092 Warner Ave. Huntington Leach, Ca. 92649 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held February 7, 1983 approved your request for a con- tinuance of your appeal relative to Special Sign Permit 182-7. The public hearing on this matter has been continued open to March 7, 1983. 1 Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMMO:&bt I f I I i ITMtplwn�:T14�.10.6227) I l Jimmy '. ..gee r� Jimmy McGee's Nite Club ' 5902 Warner Avenue lc Huntington Beach, CA 92649 C GO G�L (714) 840-6118 IAT ' February 7, lga,' The City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 RE: Special Si n Permit 82-7 Appeal Request for Extension to March 7, 1983 I would like to thank the City Council for accepting my appeal on 82-7 and grant- ing us the hearing. Yet at this time, I would like to ask for a grant of extension to March 7th, 1983 due to new circumstances that have arisen. Although we still feel strongly that a sign has a more drastic impact on us, more so than any other business in the center, we have been trying to generate interest in a multi-listing sign as recommended by staff report January 4, 1983. The owner of the property has shown interest in a multi-listing sign, though nothing definite has been decided. I would still like to give the owner time to pursue this without giving up our own chances for a sign. I personally feel a multi-lisitng can benefit us all and do not want to be greedy. In order to allow time f^r this course to be followed, I respectfully hope you will grant this extension. Cordially, Jimmy McGee JMG/sd i 2 \ r a .ti .� 04 huntington beach development services department t STAFF -----REPORT--- TO: Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development services DATE: January 4, 1983 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-7 APPLICANT: Jimmy McGee Is Night Club DATE ACCEPTED: 5902 Warner Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92649 November 161' 1982 gEQ�BT: . To permit a freestanding MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: pole sign 14 feet in height with an area of 40 square January 160 1982 feet. ZONE: C4, llighway LOCATION: Subject property is located- Commercial at the southwest corner of Warner Avenue and Springdale GENERAL PLAN: Street. General Commercial ACRE: + 12.7 acres EXISTING USE: Retail commercial 1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 82-7 based on the findings outlined in Section 6.0 of this report. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit No. 82 7 is a request to permit a freestanding pole sign 14 fee,: in height with an area of 40 square feet, to be located in an existing shopping center west of Springdale Street along the south side of Warner Avenue. sk•FM-13A SSP 82-7 January 4, 1983 Page 2 3. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to Section 15101 of the California Environmental Quality Act the subject request is categorically exempt, thus not requiring environmental review. 4. 0 SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, LAND USE: Subject Proper: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercia] ZONING: C4 Highway Commercial LAND USE: Retail Shopping Center North of Subject Property: I GENERAL PLAW DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: C4 - Highway Commercial LAND USE: Retail Commercial South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: !-Tedium Density Residential ZONING: R2 Medium Density Residential LAND USE: Apartments East of Subject Pr ' oper�y: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: C2 - Community Business District LAND USE: Retail Commercial Uses i' West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ?` ZONING: R1 - Single Family Residential LAND USE: Single Family Dcaellirtg s 5. 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Special Sign Permit No. 82-7 is a request "0 e• ect a freestanding Pole sign 14 feet in height with a sign area of 40 square feet along the south side of Warner Avenue (as indicated on the attached site plan) approximately 380 feet west of Springdale Street. Currently, the chopping center has a number of pole signs located along the Warner Avenue frontage to identify the businesses; within the center. Specifically, along Warner Avenue there are three legal freestanding pole Sig.-IS advertising: Der Wienerschnitzel, Del Taco, and Thrift the latter was approved through a special sign permit by the Planning Commission in November of 1978. In addition to the aforementioned SSP 82-7 ^•, �,.,, January 4, 1993 Page 3 freestanding signs, there are two existing temporary pole signs (Century 21 Realty, Pizza Restaurant) which, research indicates, fail to have building permits. These businesses have been cited by the Land Use division for their illegal signs. The addition of yet another freestanding sign would be in conflict with the following provision of the ordinance code: Section 9760.7 requires that only " . . . one freestanding sign per street frontage shall be permitted. " The proposed sign would be the sixth freestanding sign along the Warner Avenue frontage. In the past, iasign code allowed one freestanding sign for each freestanding building (which explains the existence of the Del Taco and Der Wienersehnitzel signs) . This practice proved to be undesirable and -was removed from the ordinance because of the abundance. of freestanding signs which appeared throughout the City in multi-building centers. It should also be noted that "Jimmy McGee's Nightclub" is located on a separate parcel within the shopping center; however, the ordinance code considers the site as an integrated shopping center because all parcels are serviced by common accgssways, driveways, parking, and iandscaping. 6.0 RECOMMENDATION: Based on the following findings, the staff recommends that the Planning Com- mission deny Special Sign Permit No. 82-7. The staff further recommends that the property owner pursue a planned sign program for the entire shopping center which would provide the applicant with appropriate signage in order to resolve the onsite signing problems. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance code will result in substantial economic hardship. Other options are available to the applicant, including a planned sign pro- gram. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the properties in the same zone classification as demonstrated by other commercial uses within the general area . 3. The granting of _his request will constitute a special privilege be- cause the applicant has options available that fall within the scope of the ordinancee, as outlined in Finding No. 1. ATTACHMENTS: I. Site Plan 2. Elevation 3. Area Map JWP:H2:dv+ V� i 7 1 Urpet Stores 77 T-miqolfet Matt fin►\ Mir, polis,Minnesota 55402 ss� Of-8 '"A el }} January 11, 1983 l�: I I` rrj? City Clerk f City of Huntington Beach t 2000 Main Street 1 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Pylon Sign Reuse �. Target Store 9882 Adams Street Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Dear Council Members: It is Target's desire to retain and reuse both pylon signs on the above mentioned site at their present height and locations. Target does wish to modify the signs to its corporate logo calling for a square 14' x 14' sign face resulting in a substantial reduction of total square footage 1 from the existing. Target asks to keep these signs for a five year period to maximize our impact as a new retailer in the community and help assure us of meeting our five year return on investment•goal . Target is therefore appealing the denial of the Planning Commission. Target's management feels strongly that proper identification is a key to Target's success and Target wants the addition of our store to be a healthy, successful addition to your city. Therefore, we ask to retain the use of the existing pylon signs on the site with minor modifications for a five year period. Thank you. If any additional information is desired, please contact me. Sinc F err S;*e TJ/JW ` A Division of the Dayton-Hudson Corporation t 1• ORIGIN UMBEAFCRpUTINp GA -F� E L� RBORNEa 574 ��1 �o� 0424925"' P.O 1 AFC ACCOUNT NUMBER SHIPPER'S REF.NUMBER, AFC ACCOUNT NUMOC/t CONSIGNEE'S REF.NUMBER TARIFF DESTINATION . 69��00�-5�1-2180 FROM(SHIPPER) TO(CONSIGNFF! CHARGES Target Stores of Hun �l�.9-ch P PAID COLLECT OT11ER HIPPER'SAOORESS 121 !• at!4 Sir• CONSI6NEE3AObRESS L � NOA V PICKU Li .i f71. 7th Flodr. Z4D Hd�� Sty ❑ • CITE i`A`T"E�21P`CO�DE CITY STATE xIPCODE 9rDELIVERV : gp] L 55 �L!�y�*d��7,� 92646� HG T/ Ia A E/DLhA TMENT► PHONE NUMBER ATTN.INAAIE/DChA RTMENT) PHON.NUMBER it ADV.ONI(il►1 rem Jacobs/Amhl tec 13 —,,I A0V �ST� . ~IKo K ITNIA NAME: .. ADDRESS: 1:� tmtnin on co%atamas CITYt t STATE ZIP: • - .°� PIECES DESCRIPTION OF PACKAGE AND CONTENTS WEIGHT RATE °j�ARio vAwE f an vAwE/IN�ur. CARRtAgL !! tNSUr1A4CE I. YN i is 1_♦♦r SCALE COMMODITY 'HEIGHT Cr1A G ^; 1 Le Y1rer CHARGE^eC WEIGHT Cpp❑ FEE {:pIMiKT. �OUANtITV � , pEOUCTIaN . E1KhRESSlADPACK ENVP.LOPE oax TUBE �REVJ ION • V SHIPPE StONATunE DIMENSIONSI SHIPPERS COB-AMOUNT COD SPECIAL SERVI nE0}!. EDD OTHER >.s TOTAL TO rAL ekARue• CHARGES u.S. IG U DATE RE E MC) TI E RECEI ED NO.O S P15. LOCA7 n..+ •• ...n.wtwtwim X w �> tii.r•r.� �•� B T Oor ORIGIN 1RV7 424925 1 U iICEIVEO IN GO URpCR ExCE AS ED T 11 tTIUN fe jr0 aPT QPA T O DELIVERY RECEIPT 2o1 Tlv lotow 4 i I huntington beach development services department STAf f . REPORT --- TO: Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development Services DATE: December 21, 1982 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-8 i ' APPLICANT: Target Stores, Div. of DATE ACCEPTED: Dayton-Hudson Corp. December 1, 1982 j 777 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minn. 55440- MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: 1392 w January 31, 1983 REQUEST: To permit two freestand- ing pole signs 50 feet in ZONE: C4, Highway Commercial J height and each having District an area of 225 square ft. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LOCATION: Southwest corner of Adams General Commercial. Avenue and Brookhurst St. EXISTING USE: ACREAGE: 11.73 aere site Retail Commercial 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 82-8 based on the findings contained in Section 6. 0 of this report. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: i Special Sign Permit No. 82-8 is a request to remodel two existing freestanding pole signs; one at 50 feet in height and the other at 45 feet in height. Each freestanding sign will have an area of 225 square feet. The subject signs are located at. the southwest corner of Adams Avenue and Brookhurst Street, one along the Adams Avenue frontage and one along the Brookhurst Street frontage. 3.0 .ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to Section 15101, Class 1, of the California Environmental Quality Act, the subject request is categorically exempt. M A•F •t3A j _.. .. .._.__....._.._, . .... .... ... .. . . . .. .. ... .... ... .. .. .. ...: . �_ tie. , ��;, II SSP 82-8 December 21, 1982 Page 2 4.0 SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USE: Subject Property: General Plan Designation: General Commercial Zoning: C4 (Highway Commercial) Land Use: Retail Commercial North of Subject Property: General Plan Designation: General Commercial Zoning: C2 (Community Business District) Land Use: Retail Commercial Center South of Subject Property: General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: ' R1 (Single Family Residential) .Land Use: Single Family Dwellings West of Subject Property: General Plan Designation: General Commercial Zoning: C2 (Communiiy Business District) Land Use: Retail Commercial East of Subject Property: r General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R2 (Single Family Residential) Land Use: Single Family Dwellings r 5.0 ANALYSIS: I Special Sign Permit No. 82-8 is a request to remodel two existing freestanding pole signs; one 50 feet in height along the Adams Avenue frontage and one 45 feet in height along the Brookhurst Street front- age. The signs were originally erected in 1970 to identify Two Guys Depart- ment Store and have remained on the site through various changes in occupancy (lastly, Fedmart) . In the past, the ordinance code per- mitted a freestanding pole sign to be erected to a height of 50 feet. Even though the height of each sign is to remain as is, the sign area of each sign is proposed to be reduced by 75 square feet from the orig- inal area of 300 square feet, to accommodate the Target Store design. i The current ordinance code restricts freestanding signs which are set back less than twelve (12) feet from the ultimate right-of-way to a maximum height of twenty (20) feet. The maximum sign area for freestanding signs is calculated at 1 square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of site frontage, not to exceed 100 square feet. As previously stated, the proposed signs are 45 and 50 feet in height with an area of 225 square feet each. SSP 82-B r� December 21, 1982 Page 3 Staff's analysis of the site after a field survey of the general loca- tion indicates that a sign height greater than the code-permitted 20 feet is unwarranted. The site lends i tgelf to a low profile monument sign which would afford adaquate visibility. The signs, as they stand today, are out of scale with the other signs in the immediate vicinity. The applicant's request to maintain the two existing freestanding signs would perpetuate nonconforming signing at a major shopping center within the City. The difference between the applicant's proposal to maintain a 50 font high sign and the maximum standard of 20 feet set forth in the sign code is significant. If the applicant had simply requested a change of copy for the exist- ing two pole signs, an administrative action application would have been processed by staff with a recommendation to allow the signs to remain for a period of two years. This would have provided the appli- cant with the necessary time to amortize the cost of the signs. Even though staff concurs that the applicant can comply with the find- ings relating to detriment of property, adverse effect on other signs in the area, and possible obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic stated in Section 9760.44 of the ordinance cede, there are no indica- tions that a substantial economic hardship exists. Staff analysis indi- cates that there are no exceptional, extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings, or premises to prevent the site from being advertised as outlined in Section 9760.7 of the ordinance code. i 6.0 RECOMMENDATION: i Based on the following findings and in keeping with the philosophy of the Planning Commission, staff reconurends that the Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 82-8. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance code will result in substantial economic hardship. The applicant has not demonstrated any exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the properties in the same zone classifications as demonstrated by other commercial. uses within the area. 3. Granting of this request would constitute a grant of special privi- lege because the signs have been fully amortized in accordance with Section 9760.4E of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan 2. Elevations 3. Letter from Applicant (� 4. Area Map JWP:H2:df I r1 • 4r _ ; f `• Nl Jill ro t will ~-� IN ---- ---- -- --- v T s � A Y554 �9 lit K Off lit fit a ' 01882 Lampment Services 60-0 (0-0 f� Q O + ,5.0 YA (O'DII` tsat.L°ESQ far-o �� C1i'� rt�FowN 1�x I5w I A 9 tN3ACTh►1 ii i i 1 C# c met , I i 4 206� o IIT' rm WwMMOD � ISK►S -r 199 The 15'x 15'x Variable height sign is constructed of panallex. The sign is interior illuminated with 800 15Or 2e mil high output fluorescent lamps. Ta:Qet symbol appears in red and logotype appears In black The 12'uprights are steel"H"beams,58lbs..finish- — 15• ed in a char brown color.The symbol 1 logotype is screen processed onto panatlex background. _ Trimmed edge white. Symbol 1 Logotype Area:225 sq. It. 1W_W 15 TARGE 1 ,.: 22,: 15- 1 t a . VARIES r a ` E q OL ZT !STIFICATIM! Target, as you know, is entering a new geographical .location and needs the benefits-•of all identification and advertising available. Target management feels strongly that proper identification is the key to Target's success and Target wants the addition of our sturen to be a healthy succersfut addition to your city. Therefore, store locations must be identified and shopping habits developed by prospective customers. The ground mounted pole signs adjacent to Adams Eve. and Brookhurst Street are our primary identification to the site. The existing vegetation adjacent to the signs restricts visibility almost completely below the existing height. The signs we are proposing would be placed atop the existing poles not exceeding the present sign height. • �I • i I Ii.B. Planning Commission January 4, 1983 Page 5 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-8 (Continued from 12-21-82) Apelicant: Target Stores, Division of Dayton-Hudson A request to permit two freestanding pole signs 50 feet in height and each having an area of 195 square feet at property located at the southwest corner of Adams Avenue and Broo}:burst Street. Commissioners Schumacher and Higgins stated that they did listen to the tape of the previous meeting and would be eligible to vote on the matter. The public hearing was opened and closed at the December 21, 1982 meeting. No new testimony was taken, however, the applicant, Mr. Jacobs, was present to answer questions. i Commis stoner -Livengood restated that he was in favor of granting the sign permit for a period of two years, because he felt it was an improve- ment with smaller square footage than the original sign. Commissioner Schumacher asked the applicant how many wall signs he anticipated. Mr. Jacobs said there would be one wall sign over the entrance. Staff felt that visibility on Adams, due to the height of the trees, could actually be increased if the sign was lowered. Commissioners discussed comparable sign permit requests; however, none could be cited where the sign in question was 50 feet high. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD AND SECONDED BY WINCHELL TO APPROVE SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 82-8 FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS WITH THE APPLICANT'S CONCURRENCE TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION. Discussion took place on the motion. Commissio.ier Higgins asked staff if enforcement in the form of posting bonds, had been done in the past. Mr. Palin responded that although there have been occasions where the City required a bond to be posted, this had not been done for quite some time; further, that to enforce compliance with the two-year period, it was stated as a condition for approval. Commissioner Schumacher stated that she felt "just as much can be accomplished" by a wall sign. THIS MOTION FAILED TO OBTAIN FOUR AFFIRMATIVE VOTES, AS FOLLOWS: AYES: Livengood, Winchell NOES: Higgins, porter, Schumacher ABSENT: Paone, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None Commissioner Livengood stated he would change his vote to "no" in order to render a decision which would allow the applicant to appeal to the City Council. The possibility of denying the sign permit was discussed in regards to whether the applicant's cost savings should be determined by the Planning Commission, Commissioner Porter felt that since the applicant was stating economic hardship as the reason for the request, Ij that his cost savings was applicable to the discussion. Commissioner Schumacher stated that if the request was approved this could start a precedent. ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT IJO. �_ H.B. Planning Commission January 4, 1983 Page 5 82-8 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING_ VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENTAL: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance code will result in substantial economic hardship. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exceptional or extraordinary � circumstances that do not apply generally to the properties in the same zone classifications as demonstrated by other commercial user within the area. 3. Granting of this request would constitute a grant of special privi- lege because the signs have been fully amortized in accordance with Section 9760.46 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4. The existing signs are out of scale with the rest of the signs in the general area and properly placed monument signs would provide proper identification along both Adams Avenue and Brookhurat Street and the building will be allowed maximum wall signs under Article 976. 1, AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Paone, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-9 (Continued fz'om 12-21-82) Applicant: Signarts Inc. c/o Jerry Kleyeteri A request to permit the installation of a double-faced, illuminated freestanding sign at a height of 50 feet on property located in the North Huntington Center, approximately 60 feet west of the San. Diego Freeway. Staff suggested that the concept of a proposed code anend- ment allowing freeway-oriented signs. Commissioner Winchell asked how many more potential businesses might be ad,rertising along the freeway . at that center. Staff responded that the other proposed plan was for a movie theater. There was a brier discussion about the "Musty Scup- per" sign also located in the North Huntington Center. The Vice Chairman reopened the public hearing. Jerry Kleveter. , repre- sentingSignarts, stated he agreed with the findings in the staff re- port. The public hearing was closed. An informal straw vote was taken with Commissioners Higgins, Livengood, Winchell and Porter supporting the staff's recommendation for approval.. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND AY HIGGINS SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-9 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY 11'11E FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed sign is compatible with -he City Council's intent to .,.. I I { I i Z p3t • ::X���+.Ixt AptiJO��P. .iilp� 11-31:o. :Auk,Acojmtumor uogm .iag1unu O:j .13J?.l OGUOT'l ;aa.zoq;V J "L,3,3 o: pauojs_,u uoaq gut.; rj"- C" � ` • �'�':�c� S:?J:n�i'3S 'i:':.':i: ufU:. 1,:,'•1:::)�ii ,zno,t Y♦ • r � Publish january 27, 1203 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AN APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COM.MISSION's DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 82-8 NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Ber,:h, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible or Monday the lth day of February , 1983 , for the purpose of considering an appeal filed to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit 82-8, a request to maintain two freestanding pole sign-, 50 feet in height, each having a sign area of 196 square feet. The signs are located on the southwest corner of Adams and Brookhurst (one along the Adams Avenue frnntage and one along Brookhurst Street)in the C4 (Highway Commercial District). (9862 Adams Ave) A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opiifions fcr or against said appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, Califorr.i3. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED_ _ 1/19/83 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Publish January 27, 1983 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AN APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION's DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 82-8 NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 7th day of February 1 1983 . for the purpose of considering an appeal filed to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit 82-89 a request to maintain two freestanding pole signs 50 feet in height, each having a sign area of 196 square feet. The signs are located on the southwest corner of Adams and Brookhurst (one along the Adams Avenue frontage and one along Brookhurst Street)in the C4 (Highway Commercial District). (9882 Adams Ave) A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. i � f All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 ► DATED 1/19/83 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 8y: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk l I NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDUIE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM_ 1r1 .iLM.4 Z TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FRO11: Z? �_ fL eNT ✓i�/c% PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC NEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE _ _DAY OF &61tQ9 irl 19J3 AP's are attached/ AP's will follow I i No AP's Initiated by: I� Planning Commission i Planning Department Petition * Appeal r" Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) YES NO Refer to Aw '✓ Planning Department - Extension t,��� for additional information. If appeal , please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal. I i 1 Ifit Superior Court li►',111: ' S I'A'1'I:UF CALIFORNIA In mul for Ihr Counla rf ormt,;r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PROW M III 111.1VATION Planning Cornmassion Public Hearine , �i..:r,.tt•..lir,ti,,., 1 IA.Ii•1 ;0•,E.e r t A li . J AIM IC J. MOORE �r1MIe yWChi r ! I li.0 I I'll:oal.,t all Ivor.hrr.•n,fill nlionrd u,., t ritirrii of Ni► • itrllrlrie Ire Ihr 1 still o.rr II,:.191,ut WtIll) our NiAt.,:1113 111'a I �� �� I..rt� I.•.roc inirn,l.if in lilt- 1ho�•r rutit It,I n1.11trG �rjp•�p�y lilt.. y� . •1�'t ! r rI'� 'tl• rr wYwM non ill,.I•rm,.I•.d.Irll..d OW I.rinirr of lilt- HUNT. BEACI t I ND. REV. "�4% �- un,t.a..;••.r.di•rfi.t..lilh'nl..lt n.I••.Lh,ln'dtulh, l'ttt'rf at p�irlltMM�le � tlniarr all tll I= 1 I l r K 111.1,4TINGTON BEACH 'r l',ui.ly of tlr.11we ufid which nt•tuli yo•t i% Iltlhli•hrd for till- AO Iw WOVA M d...•mm.ilirn t•f 1.•:.,1 urw,and inlrlla;rmr of it I;tma,11,harts' ��e1r•ty yyr� I�rM� t.r, nl,.l tthielt nrwnp.qu•r fit till tirut•+ hervirl lurntiofir.l had drlYl/Iflr�ltfl�111114 t•n.l .till h i,;,I.t-,,t lid1 i1,fit- l l•-A.1 .11, of liapint:.•u 111d 1 t-11 bw��ltlrrr�frrum�pewMc�Mriad ' iui•I which lu•w..l.,iprr hi.brrn v>Libh..hrd, priutrd uud Indl �liLil�Ffa h.lit J sit tr;:iihr intrnnl, in lilt- nid fount% of tlrani•e for itDrAA'1li�PA 1 lati.nl t*%%%tAiu.. our �uslr. 111.11 tlu• notive. of w1m11 till' INS. rI,/11NQq utuu Ord ,• u littutrd rolly. hit. In•rn pohh,ht•d in tilt- regialnr , nt.,l.uUn :.•fir td raid uowyi:,l.rr,.aid .i••t in n.q'•ulyilruirnl I111.14.4.on Ihr LOW.%ing 11.11a"to wit Dec. 9/ 1982 ..rl.lt 1.,• ll.. -Ir.l tiudt r lirtl.dt) of t..rlory thin 16t•f.ol-go n:i:I ttur un.l 4orred. GARDEN GROVE 1 t,At if A ... ... .. ...... r^ry 1 (r t1 W2 t•iil.t,•r.ii.l,lln, 1Aih d.+�t•r .Dec. 1lI..fi2... `• Development Services ' :+q;natlirr jII I �1411rQ,� cd 1 Form No.POP 92082 • I STEVENS DONALD J LAHMANI DAVID : PETERS NE:ITON S 9792 Kings Cyn Dr. 9902 Kings Cyn Dr. : 9891 Mammoth Dr. Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 9264 AP No. 151-272-02 AP No. 151-272-12 AP No. 151-272-22 ...•......................r►oddest,.a•.rr .rrrr•.r•►•r.rr.r rr.r aar as 0090000 aar of rrrrr:rrr•rrrrr••rrrrrrrrr►•rrrrrr►aaarr 0000000 INGARDIA SAMUEL P KELLY RAY W : EDWARDS WILLIAM 11 9802 Kings Canyon Dr. 9912 Kings Cyn Dr. : HUMPHRIES GUY BROWN JR. Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : 9881 Mammoth Or Huntington Bch, Ca. 9264 AP No. 151-272-03 Ap No. 151-272-13 AP No. 151-272-23 r.rr•r N r•r••rr••rrrrrrrrrrrrarrrrr•rrrrr•rrrrrr•••r•rr•rr•rrr•agar•••r••rrrr•a•rarrr•ararrrrrrr•rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrarrrrrrr•rrr ARMSTRONG J01EN O O'BRIEN THOMAS M. CASHION MAURICE R. 9822 Kings Canyon or 9922 Kings Canyon Dr. 9871 Mammoth Dr, Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 9264 AP No. 151-272-04 AP No. 151-272-14 AP No. 151-272-24 • • .rrla.rrr H rrrraa.wra•a dead rr.rrrrarr►rr.raarlrlrrarrlrrrrr•r•►•rr•r•rrrarrrrrr.rrrrrr•rrrrrr•rrrrrrrrrrawrrar•aa•rrrrrarrraaar LEE KIT H PATTI MICHAEL A OTIS LEE A. 9832 Y•ings Canyon Dr ' 9942 Kings Cyn Dr. 9861 Mammoth Dr : Co.. 92646 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 9264 Huntington Bch, a 9 � 9 AP No. 151-272-05 AP No. 151-272-15 AP No. 151- 272-25 • CHAIN HILARY K H : STERKEL MANUEiL W : ELHURR MOHAMAD SAID 9842 Kings Cyn Dr 9952 Kings Cyn Dr 9851 Mammoth Dr Huntington Bch, CA. 92646 : Huntington Bch, CA. 92646: Huntington bc,i, Ca. 92646 AP No. 151-272-06 AP No. 151-272-16 AP No. 151-272-26 r .rrrrrrrrrarrrarrrararrarrrlraraarralar•raar 0000060 rrr•arrrr.aaaar rarrr.rarrralra►rrrrrrrrrrrrr•rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrlr•rrrrrrrrr• REINHART ROGERT 0 GERARD JOHN C SANDERS TED E. JR. 9952 Kings Cyn Dr. 9951 Mammoth Dr 9841 Mammoth Dr Huntington Bch, Ca. 926461 Huntington Bch, CA. 92646 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 AP No. 151-272-07 AP No. 151-272--17 AP No. 151-272-27 •rrrrrarrrrrrrrr.••rn rrrarrrrrrrrrra.rrrrrarrrrJ•rrrrr►rrrar..rrrrrJrrrrarrr•r•ra•r•••►•••rr►H•rr•rr•r•rrrar N rrrr H 1►►rrrrr• GRUBER NEAL G TURK JOHN A SLACK AUDRE J . 9862 Kings Cyn Dr 9941 Mammoth Dr 9831 Mammoth Dr. � = Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 AP No. 151-272-08 AP No. 151-272-18 AP No. 151-272-28 •arrrrarrrrrrrrrrrr•rrrr•••••rrrrrrrrrrra•rrarrr•r••rr•rrrr••rrrrrrrrarrrrrraaaaa a aa.rrarr.rrrr•r•rrrrrrrrrr.rrrrrrrr•rrar•rr• PORTER RETA R : QURES11I MOHAMMED S A SCOTT SHUPING A. JR 9072 Kings Cyn Dr 9921 Mammoth D,. P.O. Box 5283 Huntington Each, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, CA. 92646 Huntington Bch-, Ca. 92646 AP No. 151-272-09 AP No. 151-272-19 AP No. 151-272-19 ••rar•ra••rrlrarrrrrllrrrrrlrrr.aaararraaar/rrr.•rrrrrrrlrrrr►rrrararr added added•ar•rr♦rr►rrr••rrrrlrrr•rr•rrarrrararr•rrrrYrr WARD DONALD R KIM CHA143 B : BASS RICHARD 11 9882 icings Canyon Dr 9911 Mammoth Dr 9801 Mammoth Dr. Huntington Bch, Ca. 9264611 Huntington Each, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 f 4 AP No. 151-272-10 AP No. 151-272-20 AP No. 151-272-30 f ••rrrr.rrr••a•rarrrra•rrare•rra•r.•►rrrrr►rr•r•rrrr.•r•N rrrrr•N r•rrrrrrrrarr•rrar•ararrr.urrrrarrrrr.rrrrrrrrr•r•rrrr•rrrr nWOH YIK S : DAUGHERTY SETH J : MORKEN SIDNErY A 9892 hin3s Canyon Dr 9901 Mammoth Dr : 9791 Mammoth Dr. Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92647 AP No. 151-272-11 AP t1o. 151-272-21 AP No. 151-272-31 ..1r/arrrara11/rrra•rrrrr N rrraarrarr/r N rrr•♦•rr/rrrrrrrrrrrr40964609 M u arraar•N rrrr•rrrr♦••Irrrrrlrrrr►rrr•rrrrrrrrr•r►►• I IERNAU DEZ EDWARD N w VAN SCHIJNDEL ALRERTUS Y WHITEHEAD GERALD A )802 Cathay Cir 9801 Kings Cyn Dr. 9911 Kings Cyn Dr. •luntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 ; • l kP No. 151-461-19 AP No. 151.-271-14 ? AP No. 151-271-24 { •rGlrr•r1a•r1G•.a•a.f Gas aarr.ra a a••e r.a♦•Soo wev♦♦•♦••e.sea.a•.a.rarogo.-&so.00lo/a•.•.♦Y•♦...•Iaaela•assesses@assesses e••rg•♦.•1 . ;ORMAN JOHN T, JR. ZAREMBAR BRUCE P INGARDIA SAMUEL P i 1792 Cathay Cir Z 9821 Kings Cyn Dr. 9802 Kings Canyon Dr. luntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, CA. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646I i 1P No. 151-461-20 AP No. 151-271-15 AP No. 151-271-25 {AJITA WILLIAM HURTIENNE WALTER E LIU—TONG—SHENG )782 Cathay Cir 9831 Icings Cyn Dr. 9941 Kings Canyon Dr. luntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Beach, Ca. 9264ti 1P No. 151-461-21 AP No. 151-271-16 AP No. 151-271-26 ...aa••.•.fGrrG.aa•..•r�.a••ar••-G••eaa••!•@Gave!a♦•♦a•!•••Gr•rrGu♦aa♦aa♦aGrr♦Ga•.. ,r♦••eg.e..aer•aorg.•urr.rrr.••GG.G•r u•aaar , %1ARRIOTT CORPORATION KHAMIS ANTHONY G 2 ARIMURA MASAO 1001 8 Colorado St. 9841 Kings Cyn Or 9951 Kings Canyon Or -alendale, Ca. 91205 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 ; Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 j AP No. 151-461-22 AP No. 151-271-17 AP No. 151-271-27 3[1ELL BOIL•CO....................:...FARNEY e3GaSEPHaL •.....ease......:..•��YL�aNL���.�L/f�S��:............q JESTERN TAX REGION 9851 Kings Cyn Dr. ; 9951 Kings Canyon Dr. P.O. Box 4848 Huntington Bch, CA. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 ; 4naheim, Ca. 92803 • AP No. 151-$61-24 AP No. 151-271-18 AP No. 151-271-28 • ROOKHU09STr.LTD.................�...RYBOLT a�'♦E��Otf lE.. .................�.,. �� ���i��t�'..�........gave....., JAINBRIDGE INVESTMENTS 9861 Kings Canyon DR 9971 Kings Cyn Dr. 1052 N Tustin Ave Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 ;* Anaheim, Ca. 92807 : AP No. 151-461-26 Ap No. 151-271-19 AP No. 151-•271-29 a •aaN.Jr..N...Gr H•1•Ga•N•.a...a♦r••G.:/rGrG •a• •a •• • Nr •♦• ..........I:e.f •♦ a1a•11g♦a,eaal••Y F;IM REALTY INC FED MART CORP. 9871 Kings Cyn Or 20162 Running Springs Ln 3851 Rosecrans St ? Huntington Bch, Cap. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 -1 San Diego, CA 92110 • AP No. 151-461-28 AP No. 151-271-20 AP No. 151-271-30 k PACIFIC SOUTHWEST �REALTY aa:araARC tACA•rl`OiARCIS•,510 r••wr•GaGa• MA A*MMA•t••�••f••ag.........a'' %CORD TAX 1120-12 4130 9881 Kings Cyn Dr. 20172 Running Springs Ln P.O. Box 2097 Term Annex Huntington Bch, Cal 92646 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 Los Angeles, Ca. 90051 AP No. 151-461-29 AP No. 151-271-21 AP No. 151-271-31 •a••aaa•aara..•a••G•GG u•.r•u•rarse.♦oaf♦sae!♦rr.rrGG.GGrGGeara♦argl.GaG•aaaraa•r♦rrrGlrGarr.•reaae.rel.r..g.ru r.r•r•..••ee••• IEMLEY ALAN A BURGESS GARY A DU=N JOHN F I 9781 Kings Cyn Dr. 9891 Kings Cyn Dr. 20192 Running Springs Ln ' Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646: Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 ; Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 AP No. 151-271-12 AP No. 151-271-22 AP No. 151-271-32 ••a•erG..!►ar!•H aGG�aaa••e NeGrerr♦♦•ral.rfGG•N.•raf GaG•aaa♦!r.lGarr.r♦•.rraara•a•:.•1•Grag•a•.aga•.ea Nrr••!•♦•rrr Nerr.•Ga.• WAKABAYASHI DAVID T OKADA HIDETOSHI STAN LOUIS D JR 9791 Kings Cyn Dr. 9901 Kings Canyon Or 9782 Kings Cyn Dr. Fluntington Bch, Ca. 92646: Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 AP 410. 151-271-13 AP No. 151-271-23 AP No. 155-272-01 i Ira••♦..••1rr.•a!a••111.11••1eGa1..a1I/IG.eraarrr•rasa•♦•r!•rrarrllaa/r�rG•rG.fe•Gaa1f.11•a.•.aa!!f•aa!•r.rgf G•w•faeref.••••raa•• f • s�f� SI CJ" .. ,. ............. sees.. r .Y,.. ar d Q.. v w j JOLMES AGNES T M; CK S DEVELOPMENT CO. MEEKER GEORGE R JR. 9667 Kensington Dr TAX DEPT 43245 9791 Rainier Cir. iuntington Bch, Co. 92646 : P.O. Box 37000 : Huntington Bch, CA. 92646 San Francisco, Ca. 94137 AP No. 153-405-52 AP No. 155-051-11 AP r!o. 151-461-09 •rgaaffgr.gafs►..f.aggrfrfrafsera..g.gf:...................................fggfrfra:..fr.serer.rrsesefsergrag.ffaraf.afg..rffaf PIRA RTTA L. COWGILL ROBERT H. AGULAR JOSEPH G 16151 Farjan Ln. 180 S. Lake Ave, 9801 Rainier Cir. ilantington Cch, Ca. 92647: Suite 240 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 ; Pasadena, Ca. ;� AP No. 153-405-53 AP No. 155-051-12 AP No. 151-461-10 d a******* ....e FRESUAN rROGER• L ............ % TAKATA rTOSHIKIgggg'.......ra•••• •• COPELAND�ROBERT r Ka....... �� 9639 Kensington Dr. 9781 Olympic Dr, : 9812 Rainier Cir ; tuntington Bch, Ca. 92646: Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 ; Huntingt�... Bch 92646 AP No. 153-405-54 AP No. 151-461-01 : AP No. 151-461-11 .se.agffag Postage erfrra.a.uraagrrr...frffr.rf.rargaffrrrraflrfurffrsefgrffr..argagagg goes••ear.raaaserrrof fgfgrr.a.raersesere� THOMAS VELMA C KEATHLEY WOODROW T. PLETCHER KIRBY G c/oTOWNE HOUSE PLAZA 9791 Olympic Dr. 9802 Rainier Cir 1500 Adams Aver 6315 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 . Costa Meaa, Ca. 92626 ? ;� AP No. 153-171-01 AP No. 151-461-02 AP No-151-461--12 .glafafea•ru ses/..............f.f.ff.ra:rrfagf rerrf ef.r111llar..f rraffllrl..far!••I:•..f•Ilfereelefre111.If.rl11111aa.afflrrre I THOMAS VELMA ENGSTROM EOGENE JR. FIDONE JOHN A Standard Oil Co. 9601 Olympic Dr. 9792 Rainier Cir 225 Bush St S Huntington Lich, Ca. 92646 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646: San Francisco, Ca. 94120 AP No. 153-171-02 AP No. 151-461-03 AP No. 151-461-13 .g1laerrrrsaaf grrrerleaarrsgr.eggs..• rf:afgrerggaer a egg seen ar...rrrrr...ego a a arfrrr:rsoaerrge.gargeer.revraagr sr eefrfarl.of a r. DOWNEY SAVINGS 6 LORAN MALAPIRA MARCIANO D. : WEBER CLARENCE A r KAMHOGR, JAMES S kt S 9812 Olympic Dr. so 9782 Rainier Cir. 14611 Valley Vista + Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646` ; Sherman Oaks, Ca. 91405 AP No. 155-181-03 AP No. ISI-461-04 AP No. 151-461-14 .gagglfarrlra..fffgeelgr.agfga..arr.r.rr:rrarr geese•raaaragrfraaa.r too far.r.eraef.ar:frr rrelrraasr.rrrer.re..rra ra,.g aa.g..a.r DOWIEY SAVINGS i LOAN MANKE GIRARD M. CURTIS CARL M I DSL ACCTG DEPT 9802 Olympic Dr 9781 Cathay Cir. P.O. Box 6050 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 ; Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646( Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 AP No. 155-181-05 AP No. 151-461-05 AP No. 151-461-15 .gfrra.rergglee.eNfaar+a.argrrse.frgg.a.g:ar.afro.rrrrafrraserfrga.ga...seafera.grfafrfaa.fa..rrr..flrea.aa.r.aafr.a.rasegrserer DOWNEY SAVINGS 6 LOAN HANAOKA ROY N. TURNER ROBERT F. ;{ DSL ACCTG DEPT : 9792 Olympic Dr 9791 Cathay Cir P.O. Box 6050 Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646' Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 AP No. 155-181-05 AP No. 151-461-06 AP No. 151-461-16 .rage.gr.r.frgrfarragrag.feefrrsefafaffa:a Goo sef.frfagrraferseralaa..r..efr♦afraag.a:.geese greeefeargaee.a.reaa..f.rgrrrrgefer! FAINBERT kLLAN COTR 1j SAR: LEE HSI—HSIANG TAKUSHI GIL Y 10111 Adams Ave, 9782 Olympic Dr 9801 Cathay Cir Costa Mesa, Cal ,, ` Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 P" f AF No. 155-051-07 AP No. 151-461-07 AP No. 151-461-17 gaee.gra.rase.fe.frrg•a Ness rrafrgse�r.fa:see agrsearrrau.fse.r•ga..ffrarffg ego gg.gf:r.rg goose*see gge.efrgf..grfrr.gaafggfa.gse THOMPSON, JOHN P STEBBINS ROBERT H ARENA JOSEPH C P.O. Box 719 9781 Rainier Cir. 9812 Cathay Cir Dallas, Texas 75221 : Huntington Each, Ca. 92646 ; Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 AP No. 155-051-10 AP No. 151-461-08 AP No. 151-461-18sea • — — _ - — ji V w %w %v w V ;EORGE ANTHONY t 4 751 Olympic Dr. luntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : AP-No. 151-401-10 rr•.................................r.•:rr.r.rrrr....rr.rr..r...r..r...r..rrr.r..r. •r..••.rrrrr•r.r•r.rr.r.rrrrrr.•rr.•.r•••r4 ANDAMO EMMANUEL V 9761 Olympic Dr Fluntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : %P No. 151-401-11 ZARTER FRED K 9762 Olympic Dr. ' Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 : 4P NO. 151-404-01 ..r u.rrrrr•.•rrr.rr•..rr.••rrrrr•rrrrr•�rr•.r•••..r...r.rr..r...rr•r•.r•rr♦.♦rrrrr.�r•rr.rr...rr.r a rr••.r.rrrrrr.rr..rr....rr� BRIDENBALIr STEPHEN T ,1 9761 Rainer Cir �! Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 ; s' AP No. 151-404-06 ............................................................................................................................... CNING ROY A r • 9762 Rainier Cir. ;tuntington Bch, Co. 92646 ; AP No. 1.51-405-01 •6rr06960r..1♦r1•r♦r.rrr•NNN.♦♦♦•r•rr.♦*tNr ra*r•.♦rrrrr♦r♦1..r.....r.♦N♦♦♦rr..rr.r♦r...•r•NrrNrNr♦1N..•r•rr.♦•rr rrras* JACKSON EDWARD H 9761 Cathay Cir Huntington Bch, Co. 92646 : AP No. 151-405-08 ••.•rN•rrrr rrrrrr•.•.rrr•rrr••r.r•I.r•..r•rrrrJrrurr.rJ u.•rrrr•rrrr•.r•.•rrr••r rrrrr.rrrr rr rrrrrr•r rr•r•.arr•..rr.rrrrrrrrr ' SANTO SPIRITO JOHN J. 9762 Cathay Cir Huntington Bch, Co. 92646 ; AP No. 151-406-Cl •.r..R•rr.r.•r.•..•rr•.r.•rr...rrrr•.rrrrr rrrrrr.......r 098006099909496968rrrrr•r0..:Irrr♦r•.r.r••.r..r.••1.rrrlr r•Irr...r rrrr:i ROFOLI DENNIS A 9761 Kings Cyn Dr. Huntington Bch, Ca. 92646 ; AP No. 151-406-08 • ............rr.r•r••.•rrrrrrr..rrr.•.•.r.r♦rr�...rr....rr..rrrrrr.rr..r.rrrrrrr..r....rrrrrrr.•rrrrrrrrrrrrr••.r•rr•rrrrrrr•r. • 1 r .rrrrrrrrrrr..•rrrr.r..r.r•rrrrrrr.rrrrrr.rrr.•rrrrrrr.rr too r•r.rrrrrr.r.r••.rr..rrr .rr..rrr.rrrr•rrrrr.r♦r.0600000rr0460r0001 • r • r' • : V I • r ♦...rrr.rrr.•.••r.......r.rrrrrrrrrrr•rr.••Irr•••rr/rrr.....rr coast rr...rrrrrr..rrr.rrr•rr••••.rrrr•r..r.*goes gob rrrrrrr•♦rrrr� • r 1 I jj nt& CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 11 2U00 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. I December 14, 1982 Double Gemini Corp. i 4911 Warner Avenue #212 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: Walter Brooks The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, December 6, 1982, denied your appeal relative to Special Sign Permit 82-5. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from December 15, 1982 to apply to the courts for judicial review. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:js cc: Nu Art Signmakers 2305 W. 2nd Street Santa Ana, CA 92703 Jim Palin - Development Services Director Gail Hutton - City Attorney IT919phonst 714-536.62271 1 I I § 1094.5 SPECIAL i ROCE:tMINCS Part 3 Moto 378 wattled for new• trial dr nottt• i'n•.ro.l %. tnit,r,r t•trtnn f-.totwr hnd uu juri►-lirlinn t'ulifornin Owntldeyntt•tst Iu+t. .%plivalt• 1W. will list not dt•tcrmhte morlis. Western Air (14#11) 127 t'ttl.Rptr. roil). 57 C.A.:41 21). I.Int•s inc. v. :01111-.ki (IUHi) 32 C111.1tptr. 'mini court's jadgnu•ut d-whop writ of TIP. 1111 V.A—''d all:). ntnttdnte to contpel ditevtur ttf ntrrtt ulttste V aet that letter discharging senior typ- to net monde hl•t derision retokint; lit t1don- "Ni clerk in uffive tit voottl} clerk tooted er's lit-ruse uM nirtrraft pllnt hs hrt■luvtttt tit 111al t:he unit guilty u[ ntl•vtaulurt In re• peat control wits revrnmd add ctue re ntuvhttt puWie rrcunlr fnuu Iho files still nurtuled In triad vosort willt tlirccliuum to notillating and nrerrthtc them on various rt-mand r•st*u In tlitrrtnr fur purput•e it( lutes. wherrnr In hraring before couuly t rrtmtnlderltig thtt pernity preciously lilt. Hill sertive roaunittsinn etidrure w•n% lit- loosed, Where It wits found ths%t Monte of truluevd only na to what took place on the charges against petitioner worn not one of the datrtt, fill 11n1 reclulre lit" dis- kopported by cvidrnre. Wiugfleld v. lrict euurl ttf appeal on ol.prul flout judo;• 111reclor of Arricuhure (11172) W5 Uo!. Iarnt ntvtutliug ltenior typl•t clerk writ tit Itptr.010,Z)C.A.ad 2W. ntondnte. niter revernin,; the judgment of Proceeding for rt-view of it•nint by mm- the ssgperior eourt. In truoanl the mutter to the co-i n111Nt.lon for re-nnaldetatlon• j ntinsloner li rvs rightotottn of permit to where there was n AmIlnrh> tit farts Mur. rttnnl:a vntlul; rlr:ho li s hnn hot fur rnutulhtg rent,tvttl of the dtr•untents utt ell would be rontnndrtl to Muprrinr curt our rtf the doors. (•rust v. Lot-; Angeles Conn- lialdet nlluencetallon Whether lrt % unN fubtter's tr Civil 1•eWen t•omutirnion (105:'j '_134 lint evidence to kuppurt t•tnnuds:(uuor's 1':.'d a,1l)v C..\�'d 17•I. fiudingr. r.•hrre court improperly deter- 1094.6. Judicial rav1;1111; decisions of local agen(Jes; petition; filing; time; record; decision and party defined; or- dinanctt or resole lot, (a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agency, other than school district, ai the term local agency is defined In Sec'tio►i 54951 of the Government Code, or• of any commission, bolird, officer or agent tilt -eof, may be had pursuant to Section 1094.5 of this code only If the petition for writ of mandate pur'su(int to such section Is filed ►:'ithin the time limits specified in this section. (b) Any such petition shall be filed not later than the 90th day following the date on which the decision becomes final If there Is no provision for reconsideration of the decision In any applicable provi- slon of any statute, charter, oi- rule, foi• the purposes of this section, the decislun Is final on the date It Is ninde. If there is such provision Cot, reconsideration, the decision Is final for the purposes of this sec- ' tIon upon the expiration of lire period during which such reconsidera• tine can be sought; provided, that If reconsideration is sought pursu• stet to any such provision the decision Is final for the purposes of this :section on the date that reconsideration is rejected. ` (C) The rnniplele r(•(•urfi of 111r pr•ovivdings shall lit' prepared by Itit! 1(It:tl ;14gellvy or its tuntnlist:intt, board, offiver, (It- 114crtl Willi-ll made the decision and sluill be (it-livered to the llctitioller within W llays stflt'r• he Ilas filet! ;I written request therefor. The local agency may recover from file petitioner Its actual costs for tt•nnscribing or I otherwise preparing the record. Such record shall include the tran- :ipt of Itiv Proceedings, all pleadings, all notices and orders, any pruposed decision by a hearing officer, the final decision, all admitted 674 .1 I Title 1 WRIT OF MANDATE § 1094.6 exhibits, all rejected exhibits in the possession of the local agency or Its commission, board, officer, or agent, all written evidence, and any other papers In the case. (d) If the petitioner files a rcttu"t for the record as specified in sill)tlivir;lun (v) within to days after the date the decision becomes (I- nal rLs provided In subdivision (b), Ihr tittle within which u Petition pul:sualit to Section 1051.5 may he filed shall he extended to not later than the 30th day fouowing the date on which the record Is either personally delivered or mniled to the petitioner•or his attorney of rec- ord, if he has one. (e) As used in this section, decision means adjudicatory admin- istrative decision made, after hearing, suspending, demoting, or dis- missing an officer or employee, revoking or denying an application for a permit or a license, or denying aft application for any retire- ment benefit or allowance. (f) In making a final decision as defined in subdivision (e), the local agency shall provide notice to the party that the time within which Judicial review must be sought Is governed by this section. As used In this subdivision, "party" menns an officer or em- ployee who has been suspended, demoted or dismissed; a person whose permit. or license has been revoked or whose application for a permit or license has been denied; or a person whose application for a retirement benefit or allowance,has been denied. (g) This section shall be applicable In a local agency only it the governing board thereof adopts an ordinance or resolution making this section applicable. If such ordinance or resolution is adopted, the provisions of this section shall prevail over any conflicting provI3lon In any otherwise applicable law relating to the subject matter. (Added by Stets.1976,c.276,p.581,11.) Forms Nev West's California Vwe Form-t,CHI Procedure. Library References Adnrinlrtrotkr i.nsr un•) 11rorrd11re C S. t'nh6 Administratite Bodies and ICai2:. Pei-rdnre 1 ID3. Notes of Decisions In general 1 Ilrnt Irub!Ir. 1-0.114 f.0aullon of administrative remedies 2 lord e>tr•IWItu lurbdi(tlun to drteradne whellwr Ihr onhdr prur:lre slurrltee wets )nstlll.vl; atr-I. III ;icw of tra(1ln-rti failure 1n rslouro their ndt:,lnlaruirr teorCdle." I I. In general under the It-Ma Art• trlul court errs) in A-ho-.1 bntnl'rr unilnb-rol frrrxiut: of grmithig writ of nuuulalr to ronqul super• 1-•a0her..' trrtlutlry nflr•r hr•xhrniut of trcw W11MItA•ut of %16160 nu-1 olhr-r+ to totter rrlror.l )vnr, ohor mutrret w-gallroi.•o% Malarks of 1-ernrlrt Ienrherrt, Atnndur VIII. wcr,. prw1mg, nrrnnhl?• wim rm nt,hir 1-•1 �•-�.ndnr,r Viliwafrtrn Ar'v'u %. Se-rlbr prurli a in tlolailuu of the Itoddu .let r-o (1970) 151 CaLlipir. 721, M C.A.!Ll 7,.51, 675 i [01. CITY OF HUN TINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT CC MMUNIGATION t1UNit. TON 11AUt it 1 To Charles W. Thompson r ,lames W. Palin, Director City Administrator v Development Services Subject UPDATED INFORMATION ON Date December 1, 1982 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 82-5 AGENDA ITEM F-1 n �L At the Cctober 4, 1982 City Council meeting, the City Council deferred action on the appeal of Special Sign Permit No. 82-5. The original requect was to allow the construction of an 816" by 6' freestanding monu- ment sign to identify the freestanding building located at the southeast j corner of Magnolia Street and Garfield Avenue. This item was deferred in order to allow the property owner of this building time to meet with the City of Huntington Beach and the property owner of the surrounding shopping center to work out a planned sign program for the entire commer- cial corner. Several attempts have been made by the Department of Development Services to coordinate a joint meet'.ng between Double Gemini Corporation, the owner of the freestanding building, and August Management, the owners of the surrounding shopping center, in order to discuss :i planned sign program for the entire project. At both meetings, representatives of August Management were prevent; however, Double Gemini Corporation was not repre- sented.i even though formally notified and invited both times. Therefore, the staff is recommending that the City Council sustain the September 8, 1982 Planning Commission denial of Special :;ign Permit 82-5. Additional backup information is contained in the attached Request for Council Action of September 22, 1982. JWP:SMB:df Attachment }l I I i I � 1 i t r JIMMY MC GEE'S NIGHTCLUB Y 5902 Warner at Springdale Huntington Beach , CA 25 October 1982 Huntington Beach City Hall 1 2900 Main Street j Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Councilperson: This letter is in 'regards to the recent sign permit #SSP82--7 submitted by Jimmy Mc Gee's Nightclub, 5902 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach. To explain the drastic need and monetary impact this sign will play on the longevity of the room could become a full length novel, so we will attempt to keep it brief. _Point tel : Jimmy Mc Gee 's is located back in the corner of the shopping center with no sign frontage accessible for public viewing from Warner or Springdale, nor is there visability in the parking lot. This makes it extremely difficult for people to find us when looking, not to mention street traffic that doesn' t even know we are here. Poini: 02 : Due to the location•of Jimmy Mc Gee's, it is within 1,000 facet of a residential area, ao the room is not allowed to have adult entertainment, which all of our competition in the area hits (not to mention signs) , and that leaves us no means of promotion (comedians , male dancers, etc.) to make the public even try to seek out our location, whereas; a sign would at least let us draw from street traffic. Point 03: The existing room has had many owners who have failed, and we are trying to create a new image, but have no way of communicating this to the public at large ; we have no way of letting them know we even exist at this location. We 'I have found that even radio commercials do . not work, for in addition to the address, we have to give precise directions to the front door, which we still get- irri�.ated people calling with complaints of driving around for a long time and not being able to find us . I� Point 04 : With the economy an bad as it is s:e need all the help we can get. Ths sign will get our name out in the public. li eyq. Without the sign we are "out of sight , out of mind. " No sign and we will be doomed , as the previous owners, and '+ soon go out of business as is the history of past proprietors . I I -2_ We would like at this time to express our deepest appreciation for your time and consideration in this critical matter and look: forward to meeting with you when the permit comes up for approval. On behalf of all the employees, he the owners thank you again for your attention in this matter. Sincerely, I JIMMY KC GEE'S NIGHTCLUB f .• Charlcs Darensburg .� Jimmy =q. McGee ms i i • I I i I y JIMMY MC GEE' S NIGHTCLUB 5902 Warner at Springdale Huntington Beach, CA 25 October 1982 Huntington Reach City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92.646 Dear Councilperson: + i This letter is in regardsto the recent oign permit OSSP82-7 submitted by Jimmy Mc Gee's Nightclub , 5902 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach. To explain the drastic need and monetary impact this sign will play on the longevity of the room could become a full length novel , so we will attempt to keep it brief. Point 01 : Jimmy Mc Gee 's is located hack in the corner of the shopping center with no sign frontage accessible for • public viewing from Warner or Springdale , nor is there 4 vi.sability in the parking lot . This makes It extremely difficult for people to find us when looking , not to mention street traffic that doesn ' t even know we are here . Point 02 : Due to the location•of Jimmy Mc Gees , it is within 1 ,000 feet of a residential area , so the room is not allowed to • have adult entertaLnmcnt , which all of our ;:ompetition in the area has (not to mention signs) , and that leaves us no means of promotion (comedians , male dancers , etc . ) to make the public even try to seek out our location, whereas a sign would at least 12t us draw from street traffic . Point 03 : The existing room has had many owners faho have failed , and we are trying, to create a new image, but have no way of communicating this to the public at large; we have no way of letting them know we even exist at this location . We have found that even radio commercials do . not work, for in addition to the address , we have: to give precise directions to the front door , which we still get irritated people calling with complaints of driving around for a long, time and not being able to find us. t'oint 04 : With the economy as had as 1:• is we need all the help we can get. Ths sign will get otr name out in the public ey,q. Without the sign we are "nut of Bight , out of mind . " No sign and we will be doomed , as the previous owners , and soon go out of business as is the history of past proprietors. e A _2 r We would like at this time to express our deepest aprreciation for your time and consideration in this critical matter and look forward to meeting with you when the permit comes up for approval . . I on behalf of a31 the employees , we the owners thank you again for your attention in this matter. Sincerely, JIMMY MC GEE'S NIGHTCLUB I Charles Darensburg L/,,�t�/�%lj�/ Jimmy ` McGee 1 E ma 1 lI l 1 I 1 F O N n T:��T r✓,1�/� Z? - Z86L j ps� ; �' I�'�'J� I�• III Aw '7 ] :•I� I 1 � � -. • � •lr�•Est ,�- it ��- '1� Ai..-.ef s•s• em of Lt i Cot) �F REQUES FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date September 22, 1982 Submitted ro: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administ_ata G� �• Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director of Development Services ' Sibje�; SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-�i (APPEAL) Statement of Issue Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alterltiative Actions,Arachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is Special Sign Permit. No. 82-5, an ,. appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of Special Stgn Permit No. 82-5, a request to construct an 816" by 6' freast:anding monument sign at the southeast corner of Magnolia Street and Garfield Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and the Planning staff recommend that the City Council uphold the Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 62-5 with the findings outlined in the September 8, 1.982 Planning Commission staff. report. ANALYSIS: Appellant: Double Gemini Corporation 4311 Warner Avenue, Suite 212 Huntington Beach, California 9264B Applicant: Nu Art Signmakers 2305 West Stcond Street Santa Ana, California 92703 Request: To permit the construction of an 816" free- � standing monument sign at the southeast cornea of Magnolia Street and Garfield Avenue. Location: Subject property is located on the southeast corner of Magnolia Street and Garfield Avenue. Planning Commission Action on September 8, 1982: ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY WINCHELL SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-5 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with f ,f Appeal -- SSP 92-5 September 22, 1982 Page 2 the ardinance code will result in substantial economic hardship. Other options are available to the applicant, including a planned sign program or utilizing the available space on the existing onsite sic7is. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exception or extrao.-dinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the properties in the same zone classifications as demonstrated by other commer- cial uses within the general area. 2. The granting of this request will constitute a special privi- lege because the applicant has several options available that fall within the scope of the ordinance code as outlined in Finding No. 1. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Porter, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: ?done DISCUSSION: Will strict compliance with the Sigr. Code result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. Special Sigr. Permit No. 82-5 is a request to erect a freestand- ing sign 6 feet in height with a sign area of 38.25 square feet along Magnolia Street (as indicated on the attached site plan) in the Garfield Shopping Center. Currently, the shopping center has a number of signs to identify the businesses within the center; specifically, along Garfield Avenue and along Magnolia Street there are freestanding reader board signs which identify each business in the center. in addition to the aforementioned permitted signs, the site also has a number of illegal A-frame type signs along the Magnolia Street entrance. The land use division has issued citations to the owners of these signs in the past. The addition of the subject freestanding sign would be in con- flict with the following provisions of the ordinance code: Sec- tion 9760. 7 requires that only" . . one freestanding sign per street frontage shall be permitted. " The proposed sign would be the second freestanding sign along the Magnolia Street frontage approximately 25 feet from the existing freestanding sign. There is adequate area on the existing freestanding sign to allow for the identification of the business which is the subject of the special sign permit. It should also be noted that the subject business is located within a freestanding building fronting on Magnolia Street. In the past, the sign code allowed one freestandi.ng sign for each freestanding building. This practice proved to be unde- sirable and was removed from the ordinance code because of the abundance of freestanding signs which appeared throughout the City in multi-building centers. Appeal - SSP 82-5 September 22, 1982 Page 3 Even though staff concurs that the findings relatingto Property, adverse effect on other signs in the area, detriment of obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic v.iinacan tbe Possible the aPPI;,cant, there are no indications that a substantial economicy hardship exists. Staff ana�.ysiF indicates there are no exceptonal or extraordinary circumstances or conditions ap buildings, or prernises to prevent the site from being ladvertisede to theaaq outlined in Section 9750.7 of the ordinance code. :in conclusion, based on the above analysis, and in keeping with the Past actions of the Planning Commission, the staff. and Commission are recommending that the City Council uphold the denial of Special Sign Permit No. 82--5 = ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: 1 ! Pursuant to Section 15105, Class M Quality Act, the subject request is QategoricallyrexemEtvironmental ' FUNDING SOURCE: p I Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTIM : The City Council may overturn the Planning Commission's approve Special sign Permit No. 82-5 with findi.ngs�on's denial and SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1• Staff report dated .September 8, 1982, with attachments 2• Planning Commission minutes dated September 8, 2982 3. Letter of appeal CWT:HZ:df I I SrAEE huntington beach development services department TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: September 8, 1902 SPECTAL SIGN pER1,111, NO. 82-5 APPLICANT: Nu Art Signmakers, A good DATE ACCEPTED: - Art Inc. Co. August 16, 1982 2305 West 2nd Street Santa Ana, CA 92703 FIANDAToRY PROCESSING DATE: REQUEST: A 6' by 816" freestand- October 16, 1902 ing mcinument sign at an existing :hopping center. ZONE: Subject location is at the ON Highway Commercial corner of Magnolia and Garfield. GENI;RAI, PLAN: ACREAGE: 6.6 �" acres Genera. Commercial EXISTING USE: Retail shopping center 1. 0 :SUGGESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 82-5 based on findings outlined in Section 6.0 of this i report. 2. 0 GENERAL INFORZIATION: Special Sign Permit No. 82-5 is a request to permit a 6 foot by 8 foot, 6 inch freestanding sign to be erected at the existing shopping center located on the southeast corner of Garfield Avenue and Magnolia Street. (Sections 9760.7, 9760. 44 . ) �r 9 A-i{U43A1 1 4� S.S.P. 82-5 September 3, 1982 Page 2 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to Section 15105, Class 5 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the subject request is categorically exempt. 4.0 SURROUNDING ZONINGe LAND USES GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: Highway Commercial LAND USE: Retail Commercial Center i North of Subject Pro. perty: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General •Commerc:ial. (fountain Valley) ZONING: C3 (Retail Commercial) LAND USE: Retail Commercial South of Subject Property: �.� GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONING: R3, Medium-High Density Residential i LAND USE: Apartmants � East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONING: Rl, Single Family Residential LAND USE: Single family dwelling West of Subject Pro ert : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: C4, Highway Commercial ' ?SAND USE: Retail commercial 1 5. 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: i Will strict compliance with the Sign Code result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. Special. Sign Permit No. 82-5 is a request to erect a freestanding sign 6 feet in height with a sign. area of 3B . 25 square feet along i Magnolia Street (as indicated on the attached site plan) in the Garfield Shopping Center. Currently, the shopping center has a number of signs to identify the businesses wi-,.hin the center; specifically, alonq ding Garfield Avenue and along Magnolia Street there are f. tan addi reader board signs which identify each business in the center. In addition to the aforementioned permitted signs, the site also has a number of illegal A-frame type signs along Magnolia Street entrance. The land use division has issued citations to the owners of these signs in the past. S.S.P. 82-5 �-- 'September 8, 1982 Page 3 The addition of the subje ct freestanding sign would be in conflict with the following provisior► of the Ordinance rode: Section 9760.7 requires that only one freestanding sign per street rontage shall be permitted. " The proposed sign would be the second free- standing sign along Magnolia Street: frontage approximately 25 feet from the existing freestanding sign. There is adequate area on the existing freestanding sign to allow for the identification of the business which is the subject of the special sign permit. It should also be noted that the subject business is located within a freestanding building fronting on Magnolia Street. III the past, the sign code allowed one freestanding sign for each freestanding building. This practice proved to be undesirable and was removed from the ordin- ance code because of the abundance of freestanding signs which appeared throughout the City in multi-building centers. I Even though staff concurs that th€: findings relating to detriment of Property, adverse affect: on other signs in the area, and the possible obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision can be met by the applicant, there are no indications that a substantial economic hardship existR. Staff analysis indicate3 there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or 9 premises to prevent the site from being advertised as outlined in Section 9760.7 of the Ordinance Code. 6.0 RE-COMENDATION: Based on the follo$. ,ag findings, the staff recommends that the Plan- recommends that the property owner The staff further the entire shoppincl ceritur in order ptosre,olveathedonlsite�,signingor Problems. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance Code will result in substantial economic hardship. Other options are available to the applicant, including a planted � I sign program or utilizing the available space on t•}te existing on- site signs. llica pl nt has not demonstrated any exceptional or extraordi-� 2. The a nary circumstances that do not apply generally to the in the Name zone classiFications as demonstrated b ►in i mercial :.uses within the other com-- general 'area. 3• The granting of this request will special constitute a because the applicant: has several options availabprivilege within the scope of le that the Ordinance Code as out � a. 1. lined in Finding t S.S.P. 82-5 September 8, 1982 Page 4 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may grant a special sign permit if the follow- ing findings are made: 1. (a) Strict compliance with Article 976 result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant, (b) The proposed or existing Sign would rot adversely affect other signs in the area. (c) The proposed or existing sign will not be detrimental to the I ; property located in the vicinity of such sign. t obstruct Pedestrian or (d) The proposed or existing sign does no vehicular traffic vision. j ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan i 2. Elevation 3. Area Map ,7Wp:H :df I �I 1 � Z:�4 r �� _�•Lrj'L�f'' °, �i�;.t---.ems e =�' �^-t �, `�j- +�� �•j`--'__5 I _Pr: - i-� �,� _ ._.��"i •'1_:�...._--...—to 4! RI !a SjI�JY R�1 ' ~ r IR �. RI RI Rt RIRl+ { R.� RI RI `�yRl II R51 RI "� Rt ���tar E � t RI � r i t~• t k { R! F-I p 'L_J=L._JR� i ��' C4 ~c R� '`1 3 RI �•i R1 � RI RIRI1RI ; Rt t~1y I RI +a V� Rl — Jar.-_J�L�1 �w� i— J RI �_ _ _ _ r I a i ;.... .. I .,. PRII,{� —n— 1 ,�:.t— '=r ...:.•-- CF-E I L-- --~:- I IR i i a1+�iRi r RI 1 R1 RI I M RI Rt m f I �` s i j , r� R 1 .��:T_ l Cam.+ ------: RI , �_e... ( R I I R I I R1 - — _ Rl Jis R' �� �R'� i � �; �_+ R► `�—_.`;J r J .[ - o lu i'��-C_J �1! E LS� Ri tf RI I3� RI 1 R1 } L ... ...� I .4 Rf 1 Ri } t : Rt MNSO.S s_ i ,� H.B. Planning Commission Sept. 8, 1982 Page 11 10.-..An additional gate shall be located in the fence along the south side of the project. Said gate is for Fire Department access { and shall be approved by the Fire Department as to location and locking device . 11. The installation of a holding tank dump station shall be approved as to location and installation by the Departments of Development Services and Public Works. Said dump station shall be limited to the customers of the PV storage facility only and not be opened to the general public. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Schumacher NOES: None ABS1,M: Porte!:, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None SPECIAL SIGN PER14IT NO. 82-5 h2plicant: Nu Art Signmakers, A Wood Art Inc. Company A requu--t for a 6 ft. ty 8 ft. freestanding monument sign at an existing shopping centr : located at the southeast corner of Magnolia and Garfield. I The public hearing was opened. Speaking in favor of approval was Russ Jednick stating that a monument sign would be much more aesthetically pleasing that the existing sign. Walt Brooks was also in favor of granting the special sign permit. The public hearing was closed. Some discussion took place with regard to situations, as in this in- stance, where sign rights are obtained by only part-owners of a parcel. ON MOTION BY 'IIGGINS AND SECOND BY WINCHELL SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-5 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance Code will result in substantial economic hardship. Other options are available to the applicant, including a planned sign program or utilizing the available space on the existing on-site signs. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exception or extra- ordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the pro- perties in the same zone classifications as demonstrated by other commercial uses within the general area. 3. The granting of this request will constitute a special privilege because the applicant has several options available that fall IQ -11- 9-8-82 • Nil H.B. Planning Commission Sept. 8, 1982 Page 12 "'N\ 1 within the scope of the Ordinance Code as outlined; in Finding 1i 1 AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Schumacher NOES: �•, None ABSENT: �orter, Mirjahangir I ABSTAIN.. One I A MOTION WAS\tDE BY PACNE AND SECONDED BY LIVENGOOI)/DIRF.CTING STAFF j TO PREPARE A CObF AMENDMENT WHICH WOULD PROVIDE A SECTION IN THE CC&R'S COVERING INSTANCE6 WHEN AN INTEGRATED SHOPPING CENfrER APPLIES FOtt A SPECIAL SIGN PER14f] , TO PROTECT THE SHOPPING CENTER WITH A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE ENTIRE CENTER. THIS WAS PASSED BY THE,FOLLOWING VOTE: •� r AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchel.l, Paone, Schumacher NOES: None 4 i ABSENT: Porter, Mirjahangir r•%f ABSTAIN: None , CODE AMENDMENT NO. 82-8 f Initiated by City of Huntington Beach — _ It. 7An amendment to Section 9320.11 a the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code adding n1ditional criteria stricting the height of garages and carports located at zero s' a and/or rear yard setbacks to nine (9) feet. The public hearing was open, d. Seeing ho one name forward to address � this issue, the public heading was closed. ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY LIVENGObD CODE AMENDMENT NO. 82-8 WAS APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY-,COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION ' BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:/ AYES: 1, Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Porter,Airjahangir � ABSTAIN: None APPLICATIONS N T FOR PUBLIC HEARING: ADMINISTRAT E ACTION NO. 82--1 Applicant:: Heath and Compaq After a )� ief report on the initiation of application procedure l extend7as f the use of nonconforming signs, the first Ofthe3e14pplica tions presented to the Commission for action. ti Admi istrative Action No. 82-1 is a request to of ix nonconforming signs and change of copy one one tofhtheXsixds qust -12- 9--8-82 - P, C. H.B. Planning Commission Sept. 8, 1982 Page 12 within the scope of the Ordinance Code as outlined in Finding No. 1. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Porter, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None A MOTION WAS MADE BY PAONE AND SECONDED BY LIVF.NGOOD DIRECTING STAFF TO PREPARE A CODE AMENDMENT WHICH WOULD PROVIDE A SECTION IN THE CCI;R'S COVERING INSTANCES WHEN AN INTEGRATED SHOPPING CENTER APPLIES FOR A SPECIAL SIGI1 PERMIT TO PROTECT THE SHOPPING CENTER WITH A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THO ENTIRE CENTER. THIS WAS PArSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Schumacher + NOES: None ABSENT: Porter, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None ODE AMENDMENNT NO. 82-8 I 'tiated b Cit of Huntington Beach i An am dment to Section 9320.11 of the Huntington Beacr Ordinance Code ad ng additional criteria restricting the hei hf of garages and cargo s located at zero side and/or rear yard;•*6etbacks to nine � (9) feet. .�'. The public hears was opened. Seeir•g no one came forward to address this issue, the p �lic hearing was closed ON MOTION BY WINCHELL &ND SECOND BY 1,1 ENGOOD CODE AMENDMENT NO, 82-8 WAS APPROVED ANDOMMENDED Td THE CITY COUNCIL FOR .tDOPTION BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood,` Winchell, Paone, Schumacher NOES% None ABSENT: Porter, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None APPLICATIONS NOT EdR•PUBLIC HEARING: .� ADMINISTRATIV��,� CTION NO. 82-1 �'`•. Applicant: eath and Company lAfter a rief report on the initiation of appl caa,tion procedure for J extend' g the use of nonconforming signs, the firdt of these applica- ' I tion was presented to the Commission for action. ' l/ ti.R ( A fninistrative Action No. 82--1 is a request to permit tie extended use i six nonconforming signs and change of copy on one of trie six signs, I i / 1 PUN H.L . Planning Commission Sept. 8, 1982 Page 11 10. An additional gate shall be located in the fence along the south ► side of the project. Said gate is for Fire Department access j and shall be approved by the Fire Department as to location and locking device. I 11. The installation of a holding tank dump station shall be approved as to location and installation by the Departments of Development Servicto theecustomerslic of theks. Said RV storageump facilityoonlyall andbnot limited be opened to th to the general public. AYES: Higgins, Livengocd, Winchell, Paone, Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Porter, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-5 f ARPIicant: Nu Art Signmakers, A Wood Art Inc. Company an A request for 6 freestanding southeast corner duent sign L oftMagnolia existing shopping g center located and Garfield. The public hearing was opened. Speaking in favor of approval was Russ Jednick stating that a monument sign would be much more aesthetically pleasing that the existing sign. Walt Brooks was also in favor of granting the special sign permit. The public hearing was closed. i Some discussion took place with regard to situations, as in this in- stance, where sign rights are obtained by only part-owners of a ti parcel. ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY WINCHELL SPECIAL SIGN PEP14IT NO. 82-5 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOV71NG FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the Ordinance Code will result in substantial economic hardship. Other options are available to the applicant, including a planned sign program or utilizing the available space on the existing on-site signs. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exception or extra- ordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the pro- perties in the same zone classifications as demonstrated by other commercial uses within the general area. 3. The granting of this request will constitute a special privilege because the applicant has several options available that fall -11- 9-8-82 - P.C. NUZ N'T'sIGNmAmRs A Wood Art Inc.Company 2305 West 2nd Street Santa Ana,California 92703 Telephone (714)542•.2343 September 10, 1982 "`c '. City Council r�J City of Huntington Beach � Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Subject: Special Sign Permit 82-5 Double Gemini Corporation I Authorized Agent: r.0 Art Signmakers We wish to appeal the decision of t1a planning commission in denying our request for a monument type sign at the southwest corner of Magnolia and Garfield. We are basing our appeal on the fact that staff recommendations and planning commission denial completely ignored the fact that this is a seperate parcel of property and in no way could Double Gemini Corporation comply with the recommendation of the staff since Double Gemini Corporation has no right to utilize the shopping center signs or property. Therefore Double Gemini Corporation is being denied a right that other individual parcel owners enjoy in the City of Huntington Beach. + A' Enclosed is our check for appeal fee of $165.00. Please notify the Nu Art Signmakers and Double Gemini Corporation when this hearing is scheduled. Thank for your consideration of the matter. ,t urs Tr ly, alter Broo s CC: Double Gemini Corporation 4911 Warner Ave., Suite 212 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Steve ,7edniak 1 A 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH la 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK io h Ikv ► November 2, 1982 II Double Gemini Corp. + ' 4911 Warner Ave. 4212 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held November 1 , 1982 deferred consideration of your appeal to the Planning Commission's denial to SSP 82-5 to December 6, 1982. Please contact the Development Services Department if you have any questions - 526-5271 . h Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk I AMI•J:CB:b t CC: NuArt 5ignmakers 2305 W. 2nd Street Santa Ana, C. 92703 Jim Palin, Director of Development Services I ITslephons:714.536.5227) I i i I � �� �� f � I 1 � � I `I I 1 I '''4c i I .,.,. I I i f i t ; . BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO AGE AND CONDITION OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS r .s.� �t�`Z's s. J is ♦• J ';4' -� - - _ - ' nwR�r�•�-`f•.f-.� L3 ,,,�y,�_ �r��"+�'r j-4,� r.• :- »,T 'l r. �. - - - .. ,. 'err, ,,,} � .+,�..l�t."• i'� .�. :' � fir'. � � �J� 'i•�. �" `r+tr G '. _ ,ems^ s= ��'"` 1'. -+: "�• t- f- r •- _. - ,. _ � �•; . ,�•.• t `"•-C ice-�'�•^' 4 •.4 -. 7 � .,,u a _' t.- r..�„a�„t i _ - 't".0.r+`d. ti c'�� •;may t•►� ✓ �-� + _ �.. _ `�S' .,� �` 4 �a '- ♦ � y'Y� -tom >x 4: 4 I .�"~?�st� , .. _ _ .. '� ! � .„ tr•- r'r _ ,� a+.•�'-�- +4 '""-*t.'�-3•y, drT �,;. } �-. - _ ss1 �; -_. i t- �•s'�� ' f;r�,.�; At ��.c•-��i�.+.+.- •:i�•ay.�,�~��y'�'��'3y,'��`-S�-v-•i._-� ,�(=��'� = ..i�40 +r-_ �{,• �i•,' �s ra'�" � t ��1''.M : :es�. v'_ r� 4 a- t}Y - y. i t' *'.`I!l `r .., i' i j yi w i 1 '�I�NF•w �?i-c' ♦;+S aZi�°'��+�;��"y�}"s��- a s. �� .,�' - - ,t .. �1� . .. `u{ � _ �'�.•4 k a r.�. .J�+c .j s`:- � -, (/k�/; ,'+1+74!G�71T10. Lam`. , + -R r Jr � ' � �� '+. � �+ .n!-•2'� rJ PM v .Y• r : - Kb _T.trtis` wA►-.-• rr �_ � �� r � _� I �_y : y !. ,fa yam•':+.. ='�. ♦ 3,.� � ,» �w1'�4�[,� „'�.'r,�.- +.... t 1 t n - }� � - _ ' - •ti� ��� �. 'ate .. y1e�,.r•.+_ Y��, l��c�••'';':'St* =�J ��;.. • s _ jy"J�r .•t ,,,ti:� �� ;I �✓.ry�:j;�,�P�� � '� _ ^� �� �s yy� �► '"'w�� Y's � '' �F .rfiGT A PART �'..- =1 �.•.� r �� 'v,.+`r��'t s. � _ „f �.< ��fMG•�.�LOb.�+ =�ri4�'a�' I•�l. .. 'Z w�, 1..� .:t. .ate.* .S � aF.- .�".' - 7 , ,r : :J• �.+ `��\`\�'�� + n�'i.�"�y..?..f �fia+�:i �`_- f� .-. .x f .� -i^.?'• .. .,ems .''. �"'.�1 •� :�ir - �• ✓•.,t Y_' {, _ �,r-.'1y`f�ry��� ..i ��J. axA `r j� ♦.f Si _��- ;`' _ � _, - ? '+ Y tom" c•r '�4+�'• a •r �r`�y-`�'s�^�.,i�•'3��LR3 f�7 k'" .i+rry _y - �+ - ��+• �j��`� ,r 4 J )',.•�`yfr-. ti :.A t. Y, :.� -.F ,,., - J r :� � •,. •+'•1wr1 i' f 1 �~ �` 1..•. i., i��'� r :�y.< "'r-' ^WOOD-1AND6U►yTIO 4ifiN� .. Kw.:w .etu►, viz- x �� `i''�"•'�:'6• _ �iiNlTrat^ j� - _ I. i-4 �" � �iF4Cf%r bL�TtwhNT�M►4��< • _ _ '•• • w�• �L.Di1�1l�MT1�N� �+..-,{ y�!�' r,-ter.; ����=s+wrTnlato.i�r�ei><Ir�sefFr.� �oAw � �� _ _ � � .4ee ; .+i�i,rc;r,:'e:_ .._ ��•�=-r•,. `:: Y ., � � " ��Co�+-WwITQ' y ?:`-.l;'•-:,:+": S AN _ � y -at wN�oA•+► �w _`� �.��^ �+.'.. r R• 7 �Ar INl�S1♦ -'3�J` _ - .+• o- • Amer'1�T.iat4= M ��., a- �' ♦ � - �F�' �L_TM3_ Ca OI_�MfL .fftOR—•1,•xara�` .-.'d `��". '�.s�+r ✓" _ _"1 a60�OtA��'[O�Y.'�%>`-...: �: T - J ��'1A�3���OIiTY.. ;�� ,r- ✓ ,,.+ .r 1e'• +�� - � KbAOUIiCi'QR�1!-�tD'M1�1•'JZ'AII!-D+-�- . - - ,r �I � _- - —�.�--r'�en{�?tt K�•�*k oL�+i� <i{ `'r . ?fl aT�'� � i CCO• 1i1W.�IL► COiOR- -. • j t �� r - - ?..Jta r.. �, +. •+Cs1M• �1iwi.ol p.,r.,r+•• .x,;►_J.� '�•`rG i- ` +. .rr '.i►s-..c. ." -f• '. •til:`r�I; tea'^' �`�. �T='a�G1�, r�t.��r �' " .., � +-- � �•rr�-i�`�-n-�. r'i�': 1 zs�.'` y �� •. :f..r;"{� *s'=7 y�,,._t .�, • �;: - �aJwr�i'fNNYwr- �• � �.....r►+...r.�. �.r�"� _-' .�- . .✓w:^- .:i ,w.%y k - "{�+�i � � _�.� >(• � � - r_;��+ +,1,a� f_•�' �i ..- �.f, �'�l�r.4. -. - •..ar.e"+� �.'`� -�3�+�;r�.t':�,yJ.�t� Y• �yiF-}ram: •✓•++" /,.r , -'++t-. ��'' '• � �~ +� �� Nh�}-'. � /� f.--w w4-KF-�� �-} 4� '•• ` •Y`+r�� ..,{.'i T'yl'17�.'A'•.•`7�-;Iygr..�L•? . rM f �ti� �.lam v�.��j..���++ ` � ' � '���M► 'f R� i y .i a/ _i Rom,• 11qX7 Superior Court OFTHS STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange V8()nF 0p Pl rj{j,IrAT10N CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH + CITY CLERK ` PUBLIC HEARING State of Californin 1 CountynfOrange I'M +t 11101�C i;'•� APRIL L. ELLIOTT d w c+.aNi C�rwrwa. O,w That I am anti at all times herein mentioned w•a.i n citizen Of rr+rWfw+Y4wk o ow the United States,over the aga of twenty-one years,and that I llotrbart�wOsYdtrr' lw am not a party to,unr interested in the niwtve entitled matter; tttlrpnwet eta p that I am the princilrnt clerk tit the ptinter o � f the irriil tla HUNTINGTON BEACH INA. REVIEW •w•�c:i`�e by tt�Art rrrstttslatM tJp M be besrstl at w seltsl zwd=NNW Alb1tb et oW as ill a newspaper of grnarnl circuLitinn,pulli�hrd in the City�•f Avsatr�to {tE!leiet!• 8eM! HUNTINGTON BEACH w � � M bMrw�br��we ttww� ty County of Oraty;e and which newspaper 6pohlishrd for the �rrat try iw1+a1 s4Mt+s ttW, diseminetion of local news end intrllixence tin,general charnc• i ter.and whirl newspn{n•r at all times herein mentioned had ty oftb•� ' anti atilt hits n bann tide subwriptiun list of paying subscribers, and which nrw•tp a er hit+ been estnhli%ht-d,printed and puh• 7M-4 14)fished at regular inlervlals in the said County of Orange for it leriod escerding one year; that the notice. (if which the annextA is a prinitA co r .has hero uhlished in the reinilmr Y 4.nd entire isst,e of raid nrw:gtaper,end not in any+upptemettt it e.t ' Nw.rZ MT::•:'.•.'. : threat[,tin tht•following do Nam l te+,to wit: --�._„_,,,,,• SEP. 23r 1982 I certify(or deelnre)under prnxlty of perjury that the forego. ing is true land correct. bated at. .. `t �1�N..GRRV. .......................... Cnlifntnin xhis+24th..tI,y of • SEP,,,-19.��.... ..................... Signittute t c LR CITY CIF HL. N T`It''VC"r"'taN BEACH � 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 6, 1982 Nu Art Signmakers 2305 W. Second St. Santa Ana, CA. 92703 i Attn: Walter Brooti., i The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, October 4, 1982 continued the public hearing on your appeal filed on behalf of Double Gemini Corporation, relative to Special Sign Permit 82-5 to the November 1 , 198[ meeting. Please contact the Development Services Department for further information, 536-5271. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:bt CC: Double Gemini Corp. 4911 Starner Ave. #212 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Jim Palin, Dev. Services Director (Telephone:714-53"2271 • Publish 9-23-82 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO E'C DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 82-5 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing wi11 be held by the City Council of the City 9 of Huntington Beach in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, , Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 4th day of October , 1982 for the purpose of considering an appeal :o the denial by the Planning Commission of Special Sign Permit No, 82-5, a request to permit a 6 foot by 8.5 foot free-standing monument sign to be located at an existing shopping center at the southeast corner of Magnolia Street and Garfield Avenue in the C2, (Community Business District)- 19032 Magnolia Street. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. i All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED 9/21/82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk kO � LEGAL NOTICE 1 NOTICE Or PUBLIC HEARING (,r NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public Baring will be held by the City •P•lanning Commission of the Cit of. Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considerintA r � Y( rf I �"�('l,.L• `', 'ct.�C1�C..ti;1--�' (` j-' L � � � � C•;' jl ) C\ o ) ��--�.t.rt ' � rz � (( �)P�•�" 1'L1 In Y� 1 _1 l,1 �?r�,�:�-�n•1� �•�_ )-� � '�,"t `' l � � �: c h �l �'t`) �� r k �• , -' �'n.�-'(r3-s•"".`..1 t'� f i�� Cr7•'-j /'(�. � YS.t•.t-�- --�►'1 S'�.� �, �`� . -�- ' L : Said hearing will be held at the hour of P.M. , on in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or again t the proposed ���[ tit � _,_, I Further information m y be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this day of CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 1 By I NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM rinFCiAL - �,f� .-.t..,7` • �5 TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: �')/ iC PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE DAY OF o L'lobe 1-'" 19 �C AP's are attached AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning CommLasion Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other ��// Adoption of Environmental Status (x) X— YES NO Refer to ��GVl�I(I �'(. -�. , Planning Department - Extension # ��.'l� ffor additional information. f * If appeal , please transmit enact wording to bt 'aired in the legal. NU ART SIGMAKERS, A WOOD ART Spacial Sign Permit 82-5 INC. August 24, 1982 (ill) 2305 West 2nd Street Santa Ana, Calif 92703 9 Double Gemini 153-521-02 16551 13=khurst Street Selvin Gottlieb Fountain Valleey, Calif 329 S Can&,n Drive 92708 Beverly Hills, Calif 9021.2 1 f 153-441-01 157-213--18 Shell Oil CO. W. D. Imperial 41 Western Tax Region 1633 26th Street P.O. Pox 4848 Santa Monim, Calif Anaheim, Calif 92803 90404 153-441-03 157-213-19 Hadayat Javid Burtis Ovrpciration 1600 Dove St Suite 327 U on Oil of Cal±f Newport Beach, Calif P.O. Box 7600 ; 92660 Los Angeles, Calif 90054 j 153-441-28 Cal-West R&31 Estate Fuld 80 2990 E La Palm Avenue Anaheim, Calif 92606 153-441-29 Double Gemini ' P.O. Ebx 8625 >!buntain Valley, Calif 92708 153-441-30 Jahn A Gabriel P.O. Box 3108 Santa Fb Eprirgs, Calif 90670 153-521-01 Joseph Leo Holtz Jr Mobil Oil 0arporation Tax Dept 612 S Flower Street Los Angeles, Calif 90054 I HU ART SIG MAKERS, A WOOD ART Special Sign Permit 82-5 INC. Aug mt 24, 1982 (JH) 2305 t*st 2nd Street Santa Ana, C ELUf 92703 99R�8 Double Gemini 153-521-02 16551 B=khurst Street Selvin Gottlieb Fbuntai.n Valley, Calif 329 S Camden Drive 92708 Beverly Hil1P, Calif 90212 153-441-01 157-213-18 Shall Oil Co. W. D. Mjperial 41 Western Six Region 1633 26th Street r,.0. Box 4848 Santa Mudca, Calif Anahalm, Calif 92803 90404 153-441-03 157--213-19 Jilayat Javid Burns Corporation 1600 Dave 5t Suite 327 Ution Oil of Calif Newport Beach, Caiiif P.O. Box 7600 .w2660 Los Angeles, Calif 90054 153-44148 Cal.-Writ Beal Estate Fund 80 2990 E La patina Avenue Anaheim, Calif 920M 153--441-29 Double Odnini P.O. Boat 8625 Pbuntai.n Valley, Calif 92708 153-441-30 Jon A Gabriel P.O. Door 3188 Santa To Spring*, Calif 90670 153-521-01 Joeaph Leo Holtz Jr Moixi.l Oil O=poration Tex Dspt 612 3 Flower Street Los Angeles, Calif 90054 d `40 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COM UNICATION ttuwrwcio�rt�ut a To Charles W. Thompson r Jamus W. Palin, Director City Administrator U Development Services Subject AGENDA ITEM r-1 - SPECIAL Date November 1 , 1982 � SIGN PE1*1IT NO. 82-5 f I Attached is a memo from Pat Spencer to me outlining the request of the Council that wE contact the property owners in tale Garfield/Magnolia shopping center where the subject sign request is located to resolve sign$.ng � for the total shopping center. I ; ji With the cancellation of a scheduled meeting, we have been unsuccessful to date in meeting with the property owners, and I would strongly recommend that the City Council continue action on this appeal from tonight's meeting for an additional month to give us an opportunity to attempt to get these .property owners together to discuss a planned sign program for their ` center. Absent the Council 's concurrence for a continuation for an addi- tional month, the staff would recommend that the City Council sustain the prior recommendation and deny the special sign permit. JWP:df J Attachment: Memo dated 10-28-82 :3 w JJ 1 1 w i, CITY OF H1LpNTd N4C'y ON BEACH '. f ) INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION IIL"IINC1004 UAVI To James W. Palin, Director From Charl a P. stioncer Development Services Adm. Zoning & Inspection Subject GARFIELD G MAGNOLIA - Date October 20, 1982 NUART SIG1461AKERS APPEAL TO SPECIAL SIGN PER14IT No. 82--5 As directed by Council, at their October 9 , 1982 hearing, a meeting was arranged between the principal property owners - Russ Jedinak of Double Gemini and Ed Migge of August ?Management, with Savoy Dellavia representing staff. This meeting was scheduled for Tuesday, October 26, 1982, at 2:30 p.m. As Savoy would be vacationing, I agreed to represent staff. On the scheduled date, I received a telepfione call from Russ Jedinak's - secretary, at 2:25 p.m. , informing me that Russ was detained in Los Angeles and, therefore, unable to attend our 2:30 p.m. meeting. As ` Ed Migge was already in the office, I was unable to cancel our scheduled meeting. In meeting with Ed Migge, whose organization (August Management) owns the largest parcel, and whose parcel includes the two '(2) existing free-standing signs; I was informed that August Management had never been contacted by Russ Jedinak or anyone else from his organization regarding modification of existing signage. Also, that August !Manage- ment would be more than willing to work out some amenable solution to the center's existing sign problems. Because Russ Jedinak was unable to attend our meeting of October 26, 1982, and the fact that August Management appeared to be willing to s work towards a solution that would benefit both parties, I would recommend that City Council further continue the appeal for an ` additional month. During this period, staff will be attempting to gather the parties together once again with the hope of designing a "planned sign program" that will satisfy their needs. CPS/js I cc: S. Bellavia '::)"47TN!G11?id L:EV1_a0P111_NT SERVIC1'.3 OCJ aJ•r 7 8 19J .+82) • P.O. (lox 190 Huniiiigton Eczch, CA 921618 ear t�Ttt�: Superior Court OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and fur the County of Orange kV J' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL Time I'ultt.l�;�;rtoN i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING i I State of California 1 County .f Orange or APRIL L. ELLIOTT That I am and at all times herein mentioned was at citizen of " r the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that 1 �. !10`' x am not a party to,nor interested in the sixive entitled matter; that I am the principal cletk of the printer cif the into atwAre*se HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REV. LU H i P�rtarAA � � a newspaper of general eitrniation,published in the City of 1M st HUNTINGTON BEACH county of Orange and which newspaper is published for the disemination of local news and intelligence or a general charac• i1's' "l: it W► ter,and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a 1«rna ride subeription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been esublished, printed and pub- Ytra lashed at regular intervals in the said Co.rnty of Orange for a period exceeding one year, that the notice, of which the annexed Is•_printed copy, has been published in the regular "IMM -t . .r••o d.I !Q° 'f'•' and entire issue of said newspaper.and not in any supplement Yta1 thereof.on the following dates,to wit. J U L Y St 19 S 2 !do 006 �.ttw caMwwl. I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that th-fntrgo- ing is true and corrret. Dstedat.........EARDEN_.GROVE ................. California,this t h...day of .J U L Y .l9. 8 2. . �40&................. Signature U a- t imrf No GjF.e1 jO ;, CITY OFh�lJtlr TINGTON BEACH 20M MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK September 9, 1982 Ad-Art Electrical Products Corp. 950 - 30th Street P. 0. Box 23444 Oakland, CA. 94623 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regilar z' meeting held Tuesday, September 7, 1982 granted your appeal to i the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit 82-4. Please call the Development Services Department for further in- formation - 535-5271. • Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk , AMW:CB:bt f � V (T�Isplam:»4asaasrl .. . INTHS Superior Court orTHI STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange Lo CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHt ,^,r,rrtM OF Ptl!ILICATIt)I,�,, 1, CITY CLERK I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING State of California County of Orange )a' JEANNIE L. THOMAS :- + That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citirtn of the United State*,over the age of twenty-nns years,and that I at'a not it party In.nor interested in the above entitled matter. W that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the a HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REVIEW a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of HUNTINGTON BEACH ` ;,County of(?range and which newspaper to published (nr the ibsMagsits► LN16 ;'-�;l disemination of local news and intelligence or a general charac. q ter,and which newspaper at all times herein mentim• . liar and still has a bona tide subscription list of paying sub,-.il, and which newapaper hu been established,printed ar.i y .,a lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a ',.L. ►,; �„s;{.:,; period exceeding one year, that the notice, of which the "`'`;;' It.11�s*I�st1Y annexed is a printed copy,hu been published in the regular and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement _ •.iIM';;; thereof,on the following dater,to wit: AUGUST 199 1982 certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the forego- ir g is t-ue and correct. Dated at....GARDE.N..GROVE....................... a,thisMtk.day of .. ;9...A2. Signature ��1S ,Fan�+No.C►r.fnySO qqj Publish _August 19, 1982 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION' DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 82-4 ! NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chdrnber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Tuesday w the 7th day of September 1982 . for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 82-4, a request to permit a 50 foot high, freestanding sign in lieu of the 25 foot maximum allowable height to be located approximately 230 feet west of San Diego freeway and north of Center Drive. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. 1 All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said app£3L Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED August 17, 1982 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Publish August 19, 1982 i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPFAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION' DENIAL r SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 82-4 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Tuesday the 7th day of September -, 19 82 . for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 82-40 a request to permit a 50 foot high, freestanding sign in lieu of the 25 foot maximum allowablo height to be located approximately 230 feet west of San Diego freeway and north of Center Drive. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED August 17, 1982 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk • I T ?NOTICE T CI.ERX TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEA ING LL TO: CITY CLEW"5 FICE DATE: FROM: - •4. A PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USI14G THE ATTACHED LFrAL NOTICE FOR THE DAY OF `. 19$ P'a are attached AP's Will follow Ho AP's Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal �! Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) YES NO Refcr to CAI"Ielttb PZ.4I (' .11..-, Planning Department - Extension V� 1 for additional information. * If aj e4l, please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal. i � ,U r� Q��-•�-•- . • _ __ -d►t-.- �/�•�-��-�. -.,ram .G'`-� t�'���•7.ty r��ti'�'- _:�. � ���.�-�c,.� aft�h-��+..-�'.��-,•..- „G.A. �-�- I a r • I Ad-Art Electrical Products Corp. P.O. Box 23444 Special Sign Permit Oakland, Calif 94623 tto. 82-4 Attu: Lorne R Corbet June 25, 1982 (JH) One Pacific Plaza -A Joint Venture 7777 Canter Avenue Huntington Beach Calif 92647 142-071-53 Bead Associates Broadway-Hale Stores Pr pert/ Tax Dept~ 550 S. ricKer street Loa Angeles, Calif 90071 142-071-59 Huntington Center 10100 santa Modica Blvd. suite 1900 Loe Angeles, Calif 90067 142-071-72 So. CaUf. Edison Co. 19171 Magnolia street ltuntington Beach.. Calif 92946 142-341-03 ► Cuy H. Perry 3252 Briffi all Drive Los Alamitos, Calif 90720 r �W��� / r 7/r�� •7 v �r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AugusqO.'.1982 Ad-Art Electrical Products Corp. 960. - 30t`i Street P. 0. Box 23444 Oakland, CA, 94623 s' Enclosed .is your re..eipt for an appeal filed to the denial by the Planning Comlaission of Special Sign Permit 82-4. The public hearing on y3ur appeal is scheduled for Tuesday, September 7. 1982 at 7:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible in the Council Chamber, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach. If you have any questions, please call this office - (714) 536-5227. i Alicia M. Wentworth City Clark AMW:CB:bt CC: Jim Palin, Development Services Director • (TMiplwrw:714 3542271 ' - r� :RA REQUES FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION f Date August 17. 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrate Prepared by: p �"-'• - y' James W. Palin, Director, Develo Development Servicer� Subject: APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-4 Statement of lswe, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Attemative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is- an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 82-4, a request to permit a 50 foot freestanding sign in lieu of the 25 foot maximum height allowed by Article 976. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and the Planning staff recommend that the City Council uphold the Planning Commias3mn's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 82-4. It is also recommended that the City Council adopt the findings as imposed by the Planning Commission on August 3, 1982. ANALYSIS: Appellant: Ad Art/Electrical Products Corp. 950 30th Street Oakland, CA 94623 Applicant: Same as above Location: Approximately 230 feet west of the San Diego Freeway and north side of Center Drive. Request: To permit the installation of a double faced illuminated freestanding sign at a height of 50 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON AUGUST 3, 1982: On motion by Winchell and second by Livengood, Special Sign Permit No. 82-4 was denied with the following findings, by the following vote: I. The lack of attracting freeway Traffic patronage does not justify that a substantial economic hardship will occur at this commercial site and area. Therefore, strict compliance with the Ordinance Code will not result in a substantial economic hardship. No-4/01 _...._. .. ., .. - � -. ... .. .. _._.......... .. •,.,:.._•�.� ....emu.:: August 17, 1982 Special Sign Permit 82-4 Page 2 2. There is no exceptional or extra-ordinary circumstance that does not apply genera.'.ly to other properties in the same zoning or general plan classification. furthermore, approval of this sign will encourage other businesses in the center and the surrounding vicinity to request the same type of signing. 3. The granting of this request will constitute she granting of a special privilege. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter NOES: Schumacher, Mirjahangir ABSENT: Paone ABSTAIN: None DISCUSSION: Section 9371.9, North Huntington Center Specific Plan sign regulations states, "All freestanding signs shall be limited in the number as designated on the specific plan map. No other freestanding signs shall be permitted". Site 3 (also known as One Pacific Plaza) has been allotted five freestanding signs. As a condition of approval for Con- ditional Use Permit No. 79-22, original entitlement for the project, a Planned Sign Program was submitted and approved. This approval in- cluded one center identification sign at 20 feet maximum height, three plaza directories at 4h feet height, 8 traffic facilitating signs at 7 feet height, two restaurant signs at 25 feet maximum height, and a theatre sign not to exceed 20 feet height. Discounting the directories and traffic signs, the number of freestanding signs proposed is less than the specific plan allows. In the Planned Sign Program this particular site (B) , a restaurant under construction, has been allowed a 25 foot high sign with 60 square feet sign area. The developer has requested an amendment to the planned sign program in order to increase the sign area to 136 square feet as allowed by Article 976, Sign Code, and proposed by the applicant. Planning Commission approval must be obtained if the sign is to exceed the 25 foot maximum height allowed at this location which is 21+ feet from the ultimate right-of-way of Center Drive. The Planning Commission may grant a special sign permit providing for relief from the strict application of the sign code if the following conditions are found to' exiat: for the project proposal. The applicant's letter justifying the subject request is attached. r. August 17, 1982 Special Sign ?permit 82-4 Page 3 Condition "a" : Strict compliance with the sign code will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. The applicant states briefly that a sign at maximum allowable height of 25 feet is not visible by freeway traffic. After raising a canvas ' a- varying heights, the site was viewed while traveling along the freeway, and the most readable copy was determined to be at a height of 50 feet. Signing at this height is needed to attract freeway travelers to the commercial site. A It is the staff's view that there are no exceptional or extraordinary 1 circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, building, or pre- mises to prevent the maximum height sign (25 feet) from advertising : the particular business while limiting possibilities of visual blight. Deviation from the sign code should not be allowed unless exceptional or extraordinary circumstances exist. It appears that the primary objective of the proposed sign is to obtain freeway exposure. Because the restaurant has not opened for business and receipts are not avail- Ai able to justify condition "a" , staff is unable to determine if a sub- stantial economic hardship will occur. Approval of this sign could es- y tablish a precedent which is incompatible with the objectives of the code and may constitute a special privilege to the applicant as con- trasted to the general welfare. ' Condition 2: The proposed sig:"I would not adversely affect other. signs :I in the area. The proposed sign may obstruct the visibility of the temporary direc- tional sign advertising the entire complex. Condition 3: The proposed sign Will not be detrimental to `.-he property oc`ated En—the vicinity of such sign. staff concurs that the sign will not be detrimental to property lo- cated in the vicinity. Condition 4 : The proposed sign would not obstruct pedr:strian or vehicular traffic vision. Contact with CalTrans and review of the Busi.iess and Vocations Code confirm that a sign may be located on commercial property adjacent to a freeway provided it is not illuminated by flashing, intermittent, or moving lights and the illumination of such sign does not cause glare or impai.: the vision of any driver. This sign meets the intent of the State Code. During the public hearing discussion, the Commission was reminded that additional buildings are to be constructed in this commercial cen- ter. Approx..rately 175 feet northerly of the proposed sign location will be a three-level parking structure that continues northerly ad- c jacent to the freeway for approximately 68n feet. This parking structure is parallel to and set back three feet from the San Diego August 17 1982 Specigi Sign PeXm# 82-4 Page 4 Freeway right-of-way. An approximate area of visibility has been depicted on the attached dimension site plan. This visibility � area is only on a horizontal plane fox a 25 foot high sign and a 23 ± foot high parking structure. Different elevation between the site and the freeway will also affect this sight angle. �. Also adjacent to the parking structure is a six foot high chain link fence separating the site from the freeway landscaped buffer. This buffer appears to be 15 feet wide and includes shrubbery approxi- mately 15 feet in height and eucalyptus trees in excess of 35 feet high. The developer of the commercial center indicated to staff that CalTrans has not granted him permission to replace the existing trees or trim any of the plantings within this right-of-way buffer. Staff has considered amending the planned sign program to allow sign- ing on the parking structure; however, it is felt that even by redesigning the parking structure to provide building indentations t_o allow sign placement the existing shrubbery and trees would ob- struct the intended signing. ' It should be noted that the commercial site is located at a lower elevation than the freeway. A section of the height elevations is included for your review. To permit a freestanding sign to exceed ' the maximum allowed height of 25 feet or to permit the height to be measured from the freewa; elevation would invite other businesses to apply for special sign permits. FUNDINn SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reverse the Planning Commission's action and approve Special Sign Permit No. 82-4 with the following findings: 1. Due to the locat:.* ,.i of the site adjacent to a freeway, the granting of the special sign permit will not constitute a grant of special privilege because the sign will generate patronage to ca-,••mercial areas in the vicinity. 2. The proposed F ..cin will not be detrimental to property located in the vicinity of such sign. 3. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular ` traffic vision. 4. The proposed sign will not adversly affect other signs in the area. 5. S'•rict compliance with Article 976 may result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. r. i August 17, 1982 Special Sign Permit 82-4 Page 5 SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Letter from appellant/applicant received and dated August 5, 1982 2. Staff report dated August 3, 1982 3. Area Map 4. Phase 1 Site Plan 5. Specific Site Plan 6. Dimensional Site Plan 7. Massing Elevation 8. Sign Elevation 9. Applicant's Justification 10. Business and Vocations Code .+r M4P:SP:bas .1 i 1• I S 4 1+` i i `A c t August 5, 1982 Mayor and City Council Members City of Huntington Reach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A� ATTN: City Clerk Dear Mayor and City Council Members: f, We are herewith appealing a decision of the City Planning Commission regarding special sign permit #82-4. The City Planning Commission in their meeting of August 3, 1982 voted to deny special sign permit #82-4. The special sign permit would allow a 50t high freestanding sign for a new Rusty Scupper Restaurant currently under construction adjacent to the San Diego Freeway on the West side, in the One Pacific Plaza Deve- lopment. The specific address of the new restaurant is 7887 Center Avenue, Huntington Beach, California. ' The decision to deny the special sign permit was very disappointing to � the Rusty Scupper Restaurants, because they feel it is critical to the ; success of this restaurant to have identification visible from the freeway. ; ,i During tt v month of May, we arranged for a boom truck to hold a 10t x 11l section of u L%vas at varying heights in close proximity to where the pro- posed freestanding sign would be installed, and as a result determined we needed a sign with 501 to the top to be visible both North and South bound on the freeway. We first raised the canvas to 251 in height, which would comply with your City sign code, and I, accompanied by Mr. Jerry Klein, property owner and Mr. Dudley Digges of the Rusty Scupper Restaurants, drove both directions on the fre?way. The sign at 251 could not be seen either ` South or North bound, and it was also obscured from varying positions when viewed from Center Drive and Huntington Village Lane. t I AD-ART ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION 950 30TH STREET PO 13OX e3444.OIAKLAND.CA 946P3 VtVW 1415)655.93i70 "49 J Mayor and City Council Members -2- August 5, 1982 City of Huntington Beach Secondly, we raised the canvas to 351 and drove both directions on the freeway. At 351 it was visible North bound, but could not be seen South bound because of the trees and other obstructions on the West side of the freeway. IWe then raised the canvas to 501 and drove both directions on the free- way. At 501 in height, it was visible both North and South bound. We were convinced a sign was needed at this height to be seen. There is no question that One Pacific Plaza, when fully developed, will generate good lunch business for the restaurant during the week, but the restaurant needs freeway identification to attract dinner and weekend business. Generally speaking, the Planning Staff in their recommendations to the Planning Commission agreed that; (1) the proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located In the vicinity of such sign, and (2) the proposed sign would not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. The main concern of the Planning Commission seemed to be that granting approval of our special sign permit would establish a precedent for other businesses. Our sign design was complimented by the members of the Planning Commission at the August 3rd meeting. We respectfully submit that In denyZeR. ial sign perms a defin- ite economic hardship will be expere restaurant and we ask for your review of this denial. orbett L11Cjcrh r 1 1 huntington beach development services department s A F F APO T0: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: August 3, 1982 SpECIAI, SIGN PI_I_MII NNO. 82-4 APPLICANT: Ad-Art Electrical Products Corp. DATE ACCUTED: P.O. Box 23444 • Oakland, California 94623 July 8, 1982 REQUSST: To permit the installation of MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: double faced illuminated free- September 7, 1982 standing sign at a height of 50 li ZONING: North EIunt. Center LOCATION: Approx► 230 feet nest of San Diego Specific Plan Frqmway and r-orth side of Center Drive. ACREAGE: Parcel : 3 .9 acres GI_NL•'IIAI, PLAN DESIGNATION: ----" pad: 10, 000 sq. ft. Mixed UeveIopment CMISTING USE: Commercial (udder con- struction) 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 82-4 based on findings as outlined in Section 7.0 of this staff report. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: i Special Sign Permit No. 82-4 is a request to permit a 50 foot free- standing sign in lieu of the 25 foot maximum height allowed by Article 976. 1 A-r a-:sA I SSP 82-4 August 3, 1982 ! Page 2 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On-premise signs are categorically exempt from CEQA requirements (Sec- tion 15111, Class 11) . 4.0 SURROUNDING GENERAL PLANT ZONING AND LAND USES: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Mixed Development ZONING: North Huntington Center Specific Plan LAND USE: Commercial • North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONING: Rl, separated by freeway LAND USE: Single family residential I South of Sub 'eecttPProperty: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: ROS LAND USE: Edison right-of-way West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Mixed Development ZONING: North Huntington Center Specific Plan LAND USE: Old World and apartments Cast of Subject Property: Freeway and Westminster city limits 5.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Sec' :.-n 9371.91 North Huntington Center Specific Plan s;gn regulations states, "All freestanding signs shall be limited in the number as de- signated on the specific plan map. No other freestanding signs shall be permitted". Site 3 (also known as One Pacific Plaza) has been allotted five freestanding signs. As a condition of approval for Con- ditional Use Permit No. 79-22, original entitlement for the project, a Planned Sign Program was submitted and approved. This approval in- cluded one center identification sign at 20 feet maximum height, three Plaza directories at 4h feet height, 8 traffic facilitating signs at 7 feet height, two restaurant signs at 25 feet maximum height, and a theatre sign not to exceed 20 feet height. Discounting the directories and traffic signs, the number of freestanding signs proposed is less than the specific plan allows. In the Planned Sign Program this particular site (B) , a restaurant under construction, has been allowed a 25 foot high sign with 60 square I SSP 82-4 August 3, 1982 Page 3 feet sign area. The developer has been made aware of the necessity to request an amendment to the planned sign program in order to increase the sign area to the 136 square feet as allowed by Article 976, Sign Code, and proposed by the applicant. Planning Commission approval must be obtained if the sign is to exceed the 25 foot maximum height allowed at this location which is 21+ feet from the ultimate •right-•of-way of Center Drive. The Planning Commission may grant a special sign permit providing for relief from the strict application of the sign code if the following conditions are found to exist for the project. proposal. The applicant's letter justifying the subject request is attached. Condition "a": Strict compliance with the sign code will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. The applicant states briefly that a sign at maximum allowable height of 25 feet is not visible by freeway traffic. After raising a canvas at varying heights, the site was viewed while traveling along the freeway, and the most readable copy was determined to be at a height of 50 feet. Signing at this height is needed to attract freeway travelers to the commercial site. It is the staffs view that there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the ?and, building, or pre- mises to prevent the maximum height sign (25 feet) from advertising the particular business while limiting Possibilities of visual blight.. Deviation from the sign code should not be allowed unless exceptional or extraordinary circumstances exist. It appears that the primary objective of the proposed sign is to obtain freeway exposure. Because the restaurant has not opened for business and receipts are not avail- able to justify condition "a", staff is unable to determine if a sub- stantial economic hardship will occur. Approval of this sign could es- tablish a precedent which is incompatible with the objectives of the code and may constitute a special privilege to the applicant as con- trasted to the general welfare. Condition 2: The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area. The proposed sign may obstruct the visibility of the temporary direc- tional sign advertising the entire complex. Condition 3: The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such sign. Staff concurs that the sign will not be detrimental to property lo- cated in the vicinity. Condition 4 : The proposed sign would not obstruct pedestrian or r SSP 82-4 August 31 1982 Page 4 vehicular traffic vision. Contact with CalTrans and review of the Business and Vocations Code confirm that a sign may be located on commercial property adjacent to a freeway pruvided it is not illuminated by flashing, intermittent, or moving lights and the illumination of such sign does not cause glare or impair the vision of any driver. This sign meets the intent i of the State Code. . I 6.0 RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign IPermit No. 82-4 based on the following findings: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The lack of attracting freeway traffic pat-onage does not justify that a substantial erxnomic hardship will occur at this commercial site and area. Therefore, strict compliance with the Ordinance Code will not result in a substantial economic hardship. 2. There is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstance that does not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning or general plan classification. 3. The granting of this request will constitute the granting of special privilege. ATTAC1114ENTS: 1. Area Map 2. Overall Center Site Plan 3. Specific Site Plan 4. Sign Elevation 5. Letter from applican,_ 6. Alternate Action 7. Business, and Vocation Code I �r�SP:jlm ALTERNATE ACTION: Approve special Sian Permit No. 82-4 subject to following findings and conditions: ALTERNATE ACTION FINDINGS: 1. Due to the location of the site adjacent to a freeway, the granting of the special sign permit will not constitute a grant of special privilege because the sign will generate patronage to commercial areas in the vicinity. 2. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to property located in the vicinity of such sign. 3. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. 4. The proposed sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area. 5. Strict compliance with Article 976 may result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. ALTERNATE ACTION CONDITIONS: 1. Approval of Special Sign Permit No. 82-4 is contingent upon the City's approval of an amendment to the Planned Sign Program to be submitted 'iy the developer of One Pacific Plaza. SP:jlm I Ri RI `Rf RI 1-i � ► 0-it SIGN Ra ROS ►iJSW 1', i t . • � I s Ai C2 - t1E SSp 182.,►. Jj `i ` E= HUNTINGTON MACH PLANNING DIVISION TrG1f761C'1 K i : t � �� � �t ��es•'of 1` l �i' Dom.='_J;:•;�:i1 :.�=t:�::,_ f � j 00 Yr4„ti ew • , ,f��, `� 'y��9 TPHASE 1 N Jj1 S1�T '` 1 ~ ' .�/' t\\//� ^ \ r7� ol,cn.•T,rat ►...r.7 MOU..TO y F a CDT1t!ua► s o0o u to vcrt /�/ r r ♦ t �� •yf S C O�TC[t n•1lMry a•.rto 310 :S / ` �•• • \t�`•. •♦\ �♦ TOTKi ttT.VJO ST t60 trJct3 II N4 .� i1 � s�o �� •\ � � moo, �. _f... � �.� � \ �. '1\ '3t _�'{�'p '•r�r�}.—h►-'t/It+..� '��_��► j (� 7J.•.• PHASE 1 SITE PLAN ONE PACIFIC PLAZA `~� . -, .....�......... ........., row• r^-�r.•Tl;y ."' - - ------------ �.�____ • - � ,, � .��v " +� ;�- goy —�—� ---•• .i.: rn / 't.G, r�CO �� � � _ �•. . •�`,., � s` ' `�s' Gp,-��f+.G-j' �••cl�{AL �t1t,"1 �.1_.4• i ► r . - i •►�1 .L-..ter-(ice. .Y'irC t�-'.�P��� 1 J �/'� \a t/�{Si ��� v� Q�Y il�G �O p._ orw t.I•.6� Ib .� r. +G O {-••ls.t.v. tT.B. ;•Z"�+..� r� 1 - { � ,..- 1 � , _ ' ; •�,'."��1 .,. :y"' .��-• �3.71 Fob Ir-i&. l4&b P-1 :::£.'r• !,.t�C.�4'tL'.YPVI.? - 1 - • � � t` ` �L� ZI'i'.ti f � �'T.fJ,c�, "t:J f�E'N'�I� ....� �G... - - •a '� �{..._ir�'G�r�4 .• � .�' OVljJ3� - -f --- '� - � ,��{_ • + r��r'Gr rarer- /GLI/' •ram �S `� �� .1 .`. i���,�r'� rtAN�1p7�l. �tGGVr• ,ZA.•:r LiP- -*- - } :• —�l�r _t: l CL-c ��._ :�� • ti, _1 �� �`•� 1 C\ ` - �� L. }`— 1 GL�l "�. / � , a1.0.ti . GOIs �I ! j ` � ` .�`r �..=. � 15►�fit4'X�IJIA"TE fl►RF.3� D''F 1/1S1B4LT� SiiETAf1fA.AT10N3 = f _ t .. •�'b• CTSCFfPf701F PAWNGrFEOff IM •ti OF A 25• V4j C71r1 SSl A CDF*U SHOP 19-00 SF. 50 SPACM fi f>E.,TusIRNr t0A00 120 r - •. — �J �'� - Ave C onxxs 16 93,C00 330 D Offmm1&4TO" ".goo 330 ••r Ur.ir..w.twr �+t� E OrT CES(123TORT) 153MO 510 F TIEATEA toAOD N'A "Mos". laser ~ h �• G PAD•f t7-STCWJ lox= 33 iw ••••x•T•cur .rwtua•� � H PAD.212-STOtr) 10A0o 33 ilk �' �• t 1 OFiICES t2-STCW" 12 ow AQ L�/y�4"�I r aaoT TOTA:a AOTAOOSF.144ESPaC6 PAA(/a _ SLP FA(Z PAWJMQ 651 SPACES AAFlt7Vfi STii rjm •`? T-- EAE M DEYf;neff t t�S LUrEA LEVEL 155 FU.L � q•-rt .JEl�f RJl s �'J+ r ' COMPACT 311 KUAL. \f � •-; /• i� -s' Ir�dE L IEI: f f II 1 Fl FIil � 132 COMPACT 243 LVACL III nil /•�-'��/ +�, , �, ^Kal• •.r.w 122 COMPACT 243 • �"� AOTFULL 390 CMWACT MSPACES Zs `` }�-ryt_� -1.r+ ^ �1j' �' - w ter•••.•••r•.�+•Ayl J. J•• �ym`s.i/ -,.i6.) \� .l' rra..��ii 'i r f '_� - - _Scr ar�_ _ ..r.•.r.r..+.yt� \ ,� �•i, t. - r rrR r M.tr VO M�•Y W M7•Y MM /J wA� � •� Center � � � - •-r•rasar ` Di mens� . ,'�e fan r "a'60 r4V-1or clF9 'lag 9'10,1" Pacific Plaza Huntington Beach, �a�iforma 1'� I th Developed by: Laderbel-Jerwel 2A .bb No. 7103A +r!ti r 1 I. 'y t� 'f �• •�,7.f,I •t'� c �1 t +!Pa rim a %1 �'��t ' 11�. 1 � �'� � �' �{.i't (,' '�. h� i x.; �� i'r w' 1"1fi � ' I`t � �1:� r` 11+t`' � C 1•»3 Alt,. M „ � �'t 441� � +.� '���•,+ k +TrE ti 1�+JY•3 �'.� �'S � •' r>'. •a. l }yA �� �'� • ♦ y, 4r •,,1 �i r t 1,i,1 „� r..C}`�•..�f/►t'7.�1�1a-f �„ Yrl�+Ft ���r�� f+ 1 4y - }. i) , }. ;.�}' •�: �t15.. Cep Sh,L ,.ro 1�q� f t r r . i Sq r;; tC •1, L' '• 1 i t' ;AS , 4�r�' 41,t �' ,' ��� ,� J �r �., � j •,y e ,, � a tiY:' ay t �° �. L lY>f' �51t �1, ,.� ti �4�1} �• �. {,fM ,�� t � h�t y .t 1i f �(�y1 j �y JI'.:.� . S �' t�, f.�d 1 k s11 ►rn.l` Ha. 1M „.!' �! �'•;,i k 'S r ss.� 4u` 7 P 4�r :4+v} ' + t, 1 iGS R y 4 Sy. tp +,` !. '' i i {,� `F• + �; {..L f- r }:Y. �� [!", •j,A� ''i »�"� ,h�;Ii.� '}1(ll ,'4�'` { -.Y'r»�.*y' 'l'Ir-+�t?�'� »..�l�.y,l�.9)Rti�y� ar •l.ti'� !�, 'i � �, �a1f`,.�51•?�` +�`?.. }-.,•�i �'r '�f-MI, )... ` , f,. f+,,,r f 'C aM�•�,� .n+ , .j a '.t" �, e9j 'X1.. r ••�.� C 't�t.a; -y.,�i; t'�A `:Yt .It�. 1 'Lj.r y { 9 f ,,a t ,� ���� �. 1�» �, �>,.� 7� alga «+ �-�}}.'fu ► f �W��F'� �:.f�V 'yal•I � .+ �,��� ,,, +,Sf'*r �v'i � � 'yi lt�.f fie. 5�., r�{r at y �ti, ,��,,, a ��. 4'.�t •S �: �:�� r."� { 3' '+���d.'�� ,• z "ci,, :,tZ�: fir', r�• , tilrv��'rrr �,�,� �,.+�; ,��+, •. •� r�1t� \ { �1 ,,y�,. }{ Y6tir + its Ts 'A. + ', �+ ii.Y �,i'Z ; -I!`y �•F a V �' P'� � (. ;� •f' � 1' h � � +X � I � t .�a l M �. �� � � � •►,..��ar:r;" �i�t'•7#�. � ,�, M��',�Y�.R ��' r ,f.�.f+ »r� },.j}� + .y �+t ,,�w ��i��r,�Y� ���� j 1�, Y t ..iV�+t\i,ri 1�it 4 :(. y .� l t din�yJ �'�Si�'t ti� Yn 4 1 v.� : � '^` if !r{. .1 :`1 i t ,.f r i i( r•' •7;r "'"'',^l:+S t��+i'.�� �1iS ;is.�J"b tr +$�k a tt}��f }�;: rti � .�r„ � �'►',� t r,1;� , .�' r. �,•� ,}� �., �•� r.fb �. �� ��'p v ^f . iC ivzsi�l,rfit�i "} 43;:jj y a f'; a a r:.r �tvy��t .0A N i >v% " �� � 1, .� 5f t C,� 1 f ls�^_4 ,},•'� tt•� �k• ��SA ..i ' til��3 �,�' ,^4 � 1♦. :f� � � ••�t''{ # try Zr%'„yr hl44Y � i 1 ,4M1r .r cE 1�),� t ���i Y l'6' {'t!,,'T;�+' r� •.�,t�.: {ir ar'. tr ,,�+ .�r �s i,,)y�' ! �,,tr 1�,4 o,.,4t A s,•y .q '' .. �u tlt `i+.,.l�'r i •'Y. t. 't t•.,, R.. `:lt, J.�",,.i• � 1e' 1ti t µl• 1. ♦� 4ji, i { c,: 4 .'. •'`� S•' � '" '"l,4 ` � + �.�f 4t) F•� 1'-f>`L.•r Ardr�'�'�f4 _�,. r,� t'Ih.`� _k1t,�4; jtf!.At -t1`�y�� t?«rPP �:J' i"�dr J.f.`+ r r �,,y'y.� f^�Si1 i•�' 1� �•i �;4 t.,.�� t;i4t�':�.;.-v1:+i; y�� e��tt4'S+i ;',j}•�'�., «�r•�k_ 'r� t�q{ ,,�• ' LL� r�•.�r?�. ,u4 ,yl „Y�M1't1 td�� rrj, �;�. -'� •,e a.�4„•r .f ... ;. R.+ �' ty .a..•�a r't :y 1 �' = f. ,jt i',� i,1,it4ii r �.�!. F +1f'4''^yiti(t�•' �a,� �•:+ 1� � ,y.+'�11r + ,,��w�ar {. i�, � U,.r}' f{ ,�: �� 1 tt ; . r t ! r S, ''!I.fiy `,, '.� 3�3;'� ;•PAS ?. 1 y:'4 S.�l't,, r �',� C; t' 'r^'''t��`1 ii t'J}t{�: �15 ��, A Z •�` ��4 tLL:+;rt`t,?4� �n.•..A . , .� i,. �►• i { l t 4 ,} iti .. �� �,.. r r; Y- {•1••' �� .�,`,� j i1��.tk'r� '':(k�2�(f. ..''�I �.•��•J 1�'+�1t. v,Y.«+� "'� �r;S,a atf���{t•�T �!f I�:� L, ti:. 4_ 4F • !,�' t, y �1 r. .�, �•Y .'t.'� t ` t•i 1.' t M 1n ""11 l -y 1 e s) { e.9 � .t' � � i i, 4, y � ��1�� yt+. ./.! y,�f',�, • � `.,l�•t � !k. �f;P..z. '`S��,.,Rt 5+y f�t 'tjr��.��',��� -•.!'� J'',•�4..aw t� !+ ;�y +'��Mill, t1f..5�a A.'�rt CT', C.tt'�!j�,ti�I i•:�� i ti,�,�'�r JS�If i'{!y(•' 1•P•i y�l'R ' ttr. +�r �{!P,e.� r ti4w1' �a•+� A r II oak ,7j.t?'! :'., 4,i t ,. �1`hYti + ', ,��,Yj , i!'��'1t t]3 4 <t.` > +�1 +f; '�l. 1t�. Ji,� 1 �� j '1l!tt 1. !} ♦.;tip !R'4a •+r�51��j AI?.r� y..< .'i.. 1'+� Y { i4.sir �ti.�Pi''rP! �`f`',f ,,�i f Y1, oz IY t 3 } r 1 E t • Jule 28, 1982 RECEIVED Ms. Susa n Pierce JUL 2 1982 City of Iiuntington Beach Development Services Department of Developcilent Services 2000 Alain Street Huntington Beach, CA 92640 Dear Ms. Pierce: On June 29th, 1982, when filing our application for a special sign permit for a sign 50T in overall height for the new Rusty Scupper Restaurant at 7837 Center Avenue, Iluntington Beach, you asked that we elaborate on our justifications. We are elaborating as follows: 1) T:ie Rusty Scupper Restaurant believes that strict compliance with the sign ordinance will result in a substantial economic hardship. Your sign ordinance permits a freestanding sign 251 in height. We arranged on May 17th for one of our boom trucks to hold in the air a rigid section of canvas in the vicir:ity of the proposed installation .)f tire sign. I, accom- panied by Mr. Gerry Klein, the property owner, and Mr. Dudley Digges of till: Rusty Scupper Restaurants, drove several times both North and South bound on the San Diego Freeway, and viewed the section of rigid canvas held at various heights above grade. i First, we had the canvas raised to 251 in height, and at this height the canvas could not be seen, either South bound or North bound on the freeway. In fact, at this height it was obscured at several positions on Center Drive and from Huntington Village Lane because of the restaurant building height. Second, we had the canvas raised to 35T in height, and at this height the canvas could be seen North bound on the freeway, but could not be seen South bound because of the trees and other obstructions along the West side of the freeway. AD ART EUCIrVICAI PROOMT5 CORPORATION 9SO 30TH STRECT PO EiOX 23444.0AKLANO CA 9;623 PHONC 4415,655.9300 I i t k. Ms. Susan Pierce •-2- June 28 1982 1 C'.ty of Huntington Beach We then raised the canvas to 501 in height, and at this height the canvas could be seen both North and South bound. The property owner, Mr. Gerry Klein and we, became convinced we needed the height of the sign at 501 'o be t . viewed from the freeway. One Pacific Plaza, when fully developed will consist mainly of office buildings, and while this will generate business for the restaurant during lunch hours Monday through Friday, business for dinner during the week and lunch and dinner on the weekends must come from elsewhere, and hence the real need to effectively adver- tise to the freeway traffic. rr, 2) We do not believe the proposed sign will adversely affect any other signs in the area. The only other existing sign in the; area is the large One Pacific Plaza sign. 3) We do not believe the proposed sign will be detrimental to the surrounding properties. In fact, when we viewed the rigid canvas held at 50T in height, the property owner, Mr. Gerry Klein was convinced this was the correct height, and commented that this height was compatible with the: building and surrounding area, and he thought the height of 501 was reasonable. 4) We do not believe the proposed sign will obstruct pedes- trian or vehicular traffic vision in any way. If we can canswer any questions that may arise in connection with our application for a special sign permit, please contact tile. / Sincerely,' 1 1 t 1,0,rne R. Corbett LRC/crh Ash § S404 Div. I�ttc►r•ta�ln�s ,��u �'c�cr�'rlcl'ti� Crn« Rrlrrrltres V . nmlru'!�+digit rlrl ,ir(iurd.err r1ii�'Ir 1','•r _ i t.lhrar� nrrcrcrlce% I.irru�r++ C�lir_1. 1'..I.�. l.i,,.n•r•• Nnlct Of Der"1011% i i�ur, „ill p�•1 n t,�rr,r uUli �n(r u�r I� 1. Cnnxitu•:tion and applicalin' r.truf pnbG• hi !rn.��• in nnhu..r1"11:1011 t'liiv llrl 1.&:W3Iitr lulrlll In pen u( 4 vi�lr 6tatr n•t:�tl'llimt •n tictl ad,rlli•inl: rn�•;1 �1 1 § 5405. 1lispl:ty:� pt ahihi(rd; 1•xrcptionr 1 (a) 1�'AI\\'II IISI aIldlll(; :IttY cll hl'1' {ll'n\'i`�ir)It of tills ('hapll`l', Iln ail• \crtisini; display shall it 111,W(A at mabtlainctl «itltin E,GfI frt'l hoot the edge of the right-of-way of, alul tht, roily' of which is \isihlt' from. ` any Interstate or {Il imsu y Ilic;h\\•ay, and no advV111sini; display shall be placed or nlaililaint'd heyond (iftt) feel from Iht' rdi;e of thcr rii;hl- IV, display 'll af-\raYi tilet r�a\viilig oil all%Inteti st`ttetl of- primal y lltii;h\\•a1y. othet- by pet':ons than the fonowini;: (1) Directional or ()('IV" official signs or notices That are e - k r{uired or autho"IMI by la\v, {ficlutltrli;, hilt not litnitt'd to, signs pr- tainini; to natural \\ondt'rc, scc•nir. alto hisloriral allrartion.4, and which comply wills rt't~ulaliofi5 \\•hirli ~hall it' prrnnult;ated by tilt, ' director• relative to their lii;hlilig, size, number. sparilig and such otll- er requirrntetlls its fitly he appropriate la iniplt'ittcnt this chaplet•, ` which regillatlons slutil lint he inconsistent wilh curb national stand- of y 1111, Sit ludsc c1r1:�tIooeof lherlgaled Unitrrlfrom Slatc'tilllv put��lafittttn►suhdivisiont(c) of Tran i I Section 131 of'1'itle 2:1 of the Ufiitt'd Stales Cocle. ' 1 (2) Act�t'rti5ini; displays ad\'ertisll1g tilt' s:11t' or IV'.a of tilt' properly upon Willeh they air lut:►trd, provided all such arht'rlisinl; i displays wittiil, 660 fc'ct of tilt'. edit' of me rii;ht-of-\\'sly of it hnnu' sefimrnl shall comply withtilerei;ulalions prescrihed {lursuitlri lt; Sections 5251 and :11 i7i. f _ GOAdvt'rlisint; displays \\•llirh ad\rrlisl• the btr�inrs� cnnductcd f or st't'virrs r'rfillvrrd rn• 11u• i;oods IWO(Iltrrti or soil ttpult lot' property upon witit.h till' advi'rtisini; display is placed. if tile display is upon Ow sanit'. Sidi, of the bit'llway as the adrrt•tised activity; Ilrovicicd .111 i such 1uh-vi•tisilii; disphlys within 660 fret of the i•:i;ht-cif-\\sly of a Ili). fins sehnlvilt shall comply with the rel"111a1iolts presrrilled purs1ua11t to 1 Sections 5251, 51113, aid 5115; r,iul provid(A that no such aderrlishlt; display shall he placed after .11111tilry 1, 14171, if it contains flashhtR, ! 124 C r Ii RFQUES) FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date July 8, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director of Development Services o Subject: APPEAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-2 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attnchments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for the City Council 's consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial on June 15, 1982, of Special Sign Permit No. 82--2. The special sign permit is a request to permit an additional freestanding sign for the shopping center located at Davenport Drive and Algonquin Street. RECOMMENDATION: The staff and Planning Commission are recommending that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 82-2 which would disallow the addition of a freestanding sign along Davenport Drive. ANALYSIS: APPLICANT: Pacific Federal. Savings 701 N. "E" Street San Bernardino, Calif. APPELLANT: Quale Brothers Sign Company 272 S. "I" Street San Bernardino, Calif. 92410 AQ�: To permit an additional freestanding sign for an existing shopping center. LOCATION: The northwest corner of Davenport Drive and Algonqui. Street. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON JUNE 15, 1982: ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY PORTER SPECIAI, SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-2 WAS IIENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Paone, Winchell, Porter :DOES: done Plo 4/81 1 � SSP 82-2 July 8, 1982 Page 2 ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAI V: None FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. Strict compliance with the Ordinance Code will not result in a substantial economic hardship because of options available 9 to the applicant for locating the sign on Saybrook Lane frontage. 2. There is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstance that does not apply generally to other shopping centers located in commercial districts. 3. The granting of this special sign permit request would consti- tute the granting of a special privilege because an additional r freestanding sign would be allowed on Davenport Drive frontage. DISCUSSION: Special Sign Permit No. 82-2 is a request to permit a freestanding sign on Davenport Drive to identify one of the tenants located in the existing center. The subject tenant has frontage on Davenport and is separated from the right-of-way by a landscaped area and a single row of parking. The existing shopping center presently has a freestanding sign adjacent to the Davenport frontage. Under the provisions of Article 976, the sign ordinance, only one freestanding sign is allowed along each frontage of a shopping center. Therefore, the placement of this additional 64 square foot freestanding sign would violate Article 976 by allowing more than one freestanding sign per street frontage. The proposed sign is 20 feet in height and 64 square feet in area. After considerable discussion at the June 15, 1982 Planning Commis- sion meeting, the Commission concurred that there was no specific hardship related to the shopping center and, therefore, the granting of this special sign permit would constitute the granting of a special privilege. The Commission also indicated that by moving the proposed sign back 15 to 20 feet, behind the building face line, the proposed sign would comply with Article 976 and would be allowed. Based on the analysis and the staff report and Commisnion discussion, the Planning Commission denied Special Sign Permit No. 82-2. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, on--premise signs are a Class 11 categorical exemption. FUNDING SOURCE: Non-applicable. 4i �l SSP 82-2 July 8, 1982 Page 3 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may consider overturning the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 82-2, which would allcw the ad- dition of a freestanding sign on a street frontage which presently has one freestanding sign. SUPPORTING INFOR14ATION: 1. Area Map 2. Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 15, 1982. 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated June 15, 1982. 4. Alternative Findings for Approval. I 5. Letter of appeal. i JWP:SMB:jlm f I II • ci- I� R2r R� ` -" R2 R2 t' R2 : C41 . RI 'I a, R3 R2 R2 R2 R2 ,:� =y7 41 E y\ iSJ a 1 r I �, I R - R2 R2, I R2 :R2 R2 R2 R3 - l • R i RI C4 _� , ,. , RI �� �- ' R3 .r_.. RI r �� — R3 R3 R3 ,. R3 ,r , r. im, RI (:f R1 R! RI I`- RI 1. RI ��. ..-�i RI IR3 ` • � R3 R3 !� R I �._.�..,..� �Rs, , L—_ R3 ' C4 I, 1` � r7.l..al7t1!-j RI RI «-. RI , RCS J } a — Rl ?, +INARNER aos `:.vi= . ai . ' RI / i. . R2•PJ 5SP02--2 NL�tsti,rr>%e,u H HUNTSNGTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION huntington beach development services department STAf f REPORT TO: Planning Commission PROM: Department of Development Services DA,rr. June 1.5, AP 111,1 7%NT: P;1(.-j I i I 1:dt'l-'i 1 1, PED: V r e(I I 1Y: i C,r n'!I-(! i lit), 9 4 1) 1 1%()CF!,'-',N*1G, DATE: AGENT: olliol ATTV: Mancy .1"114111 272 1;. 1 ;txe(,1: !8 , 191?:,. n I te rm!Y-d j lio , CA 92 4 M To permit an additional C41 f reel Land in(i sj(jji on Daven- port Drivo, PAI, Pi I C( 11;1.11 I (ICATTON: :%Ib USE: on th.- 11cwt-h (fl' DIvofl- poi:I Di J vo in L I w I Itin t i n(I ton Conter. C(.v1;1w I'( I I hop!)i 11(j ACR E.AGL: 10. H3 0(-1*(."s 1 .0 SUGGESTED ACTION: The staff reconmends that the Planning coitunission deny Special I`j Sign Permit No. 82-2 based on findings as outlined in Section 7 .0 of this staff report. 2. 0 GENERAL INFORRATION: Special Sign Permit No. 82-2 is a request to permit an additional 64 square foot, 20 foot high, freestanding sign on Davenport Drive, which would then exceed the one freestanding sign per site per street frontage allowed by code. A-rM-23A SV t12-2 { .Tune 15, 1982 � Pa( u 2 1.0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES: ._ In accordance with Section 9760.44 of the ordinance Code, the Commission may clrant- it special sicin J)errtiti t PI-Ovidinct for relief from t: strict appl icretion of then provisions of the: ordinance code suoject to a finding that tile following conditions exist: it. Strict compliance with the sign coclC will result in a strb-- stantial economic hrerdship to the 0PP1icnnt; find b. The proposed Sian would not a(lversely affect other signs in the area; and e. The proposed sictn will not be detrimental to 010 property located in the vicinity of such sign:; ; alld i , d. The proposed si(ln clods not obstruct. pedeSt:riall Mid vchicu-- lar traffic vision. 4.0 ENVIRONMEWAL, STATUS: On-premise signs are categorically exempt from CL•'QA requirements (Section 15111 , Class 11) . 5. 0 SURROUNDING GENE'RAI, PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USI.:S: Subject Proper General Plan Designation: General Commercial ►1 Zoning: C4 Land Use: Commercial ;l North of Su�.bject Pro )ert : " _E,�_Y. General Plan besignatioil: High Density Residential j Zoning: R3 Land Use: Planned Residential Development � South of Subject Pro7ert General Plan Desginat:ion: Low Density llesident-ial Zoning: R1 Land Use: Single Family Dwellings (Jest of Subject. l'r.o iert : General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential 'honing: Rl Land Use: Single Family Dwellings EasL of Fub-ject_Pro1?erty: General Plan Desicfnation: Medium and Iligh Density Residential Zoning: 112 and R3 Land Use: Mixed Residential Devulopment-s I , SSP 82-2 j11Ile 15, 1982 Page 3 6 . 0 %NAL,YS I S: � 11 t.,'ll-�Il•I•'� At tlll' t lllit' t: At code pr(�V1s lUi1S :J(`Ct' lc`:;:; It St l l(_l.l�'(', z, t (Jwlnti roo ',Iclrls alld multiple freestanding signs on -Istreet- ' ()Ile of the tenants of r the center. had a large fl-cestanding �sil1, 1Ocaie(1 11 tillsc'arca now under consideration, (iir.. �..r to site l 1 I) areas relocation to planter. area at sollthwCsstL'llctioneoff�11)cnewlbuil.ding adjacent to Bui l(lin(.t No. 4) . Up011 1 for this tenant (;n ar1C)t:11C'1" 1rC'' of this site, that business' s , sign was relocated. 1'Lt' ;elltly locate-,d on this sane street, paveil- port Avenue, is t� center i(lentification siclrl �brclsitee to per street sign code provisions, otic frc�e:;taildinet s.i.(in 1 1 ; Frontage is now a: 1owod. t In .)flnUar"y �.il' tlti_� }'cat a r�`gn,.c;t for ,1 lnlilciiny E't`tmit, for a freest., l ll�t S 1'.I11 (tll t:il l i i wils 1'['(-'('1 ':1 (l. :�t it t f 111('t. l'l t:ll t}ll' sign company rcpr(':;enta ti�t'Sznbr ook1 I.ane(lf frontage. 1)SubsequentlySions �cll would allow a sign on t Y i a permit was issueclefor chsconstit:utedign to be o frontage llonclSaybreo}erlport A. 2nue buildlncl l.in justification by the apl)li.cant for t:::e request to relocate this 64 square foot sign at a 2.0 foot height states that strict compli- ance with the Sign oL•tlin,_lnce will rasul.t in a substantial hardship because " . . . the sign needs to be located with the general public in mind and located (her(_) because it. coul(l have a sign where (previaus tenant) hr,cl on pedestrianfo "' oSt'aff"as determined that the sign will not . bstruct traffic, but may icular be detrimental to surrounding properties. Approval of Such a permit, however, may constitute a special privilege to the applicant based on the current .gn code criteria and would set a precedent for other future sites. 7 .0 RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning ''ommissi.on deny Special sed on the following findings: Sign Permit No. 82-2 ba I'INDINGS 1'OR pENIAL: result in 1 . Strict compl iancr_ with the ordinance i ,n lecausoclofwU{ i�°5 -1 Table to a substantial economic har(lsl 1 the applicant for locating the sign on the Saybrook Lane frontage. 2. There is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstance ilhat does not apply generally t.a other shoppincl centers locat.ed com - vial di.st.ricls. 3. The granting Of this special sign permit request: will constitute i the granting of a special privilege because an additialral free- standing si.tln woll.l(1 be allowed on the Davenport frontage. ` 8.0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: ' The Commission nwy choost! to rovc Special S.ictp I'( rrlli t No. 82-2 tJitll findings. I I 1 r SSP n2-2 June: 15, 1982 Rage 4 i ATTACHMr•NTS: 1. Area Map ? 2. Site Plan i 3. Sign Copy A . Alternate Findings ' { i P:di f _ti SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-2 ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Due to the location of tale site with r ijor access to the. center { via Davenport: Drive and Algonquin Streut, the building setback exceeding a 50-foot minimum from those sL-tects, anti the proposed sign setback also exceedino Lho 50-foot minirnurr., the impact, if any, on adjacent properti.es will. be minimal . 2. The proposed sitln clots not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. i 3 . The proposed ,zyn will not. adversely affect. other :,icJns in the area. 4 . Strict compliance With Article 976 may result in a substantial 1 economic hardship to the applicant. I Minutes, H.B. Plannii Commission June 15, 1982 Page 12 ' ce Winchell inquired if the signs shown in pictures which had b istri.buted to the Commission had been installed before the pre sign code went into effect, and was informed that th had been. of discussion took place on the difficulty of en ing the remo f nonconforming signs. The public he was opened . Phil. Walker of the company addressed the Co Sion to urge approval of the reqe There were no other ns to speak for or against the proposa . d the public hea. was closed. Commission discussion ensue ON MOTION BY POPPER ND SECOND B CONDITIONAI. EXCEPTION NO. 82-05 WAS DENIED WI::1 THE FOLLOWIN DINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . Exceptional circumstan do not apply deprive the subject property of privile_ njoyed on other pi ties in the vicin- ity. The site is , andard location for, a ice station. There is no spec ' topographic feature or an ue cbaracter- istics related the land. 2. Since the t•ion of the Service Station Standards ine of � 1976, n ditional exceptions have been clra need for ria- tion e required height or area of signs. An approva the sub ' request would be precedent-setting. AYES Biggins, Livengood, Paor.e, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher NO None T: None • , TAIN: None SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-2 A211icant: Pacific Federal. Savings To permit an additional freestanding sign on Davenport Drive in the Harbor Shopping Center on the north side of Davenport. The public hearing was opened. Ray Quiel, representing the sign company, explained that ile had been granted a permit for the sign and in the process of installing it had found that moving it approximately 20 to 25 feet would pro- vide better visibility for t.11e use. That move is what necessitated the special sign permit request. Margo Chapman, representing Security Pacific Bank (also a tenant of the shopping center ) addressed the Commission in support of the requested sign location. -1.2- G-15-82 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission June 15, 1982 Page 13 The public hearing was closed. The Commission considered the distance the proposed sign would be set back froFa Davenport Drive (approximately 65 to 75 feet , the obstructions at the original site which make the new site for the sign more desi.rabi.e, and the overall number of signs in the shopping center. . ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY PORTER SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 82-2 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: ! 1. Strict compliance with the ordinance code will not result in � a substan'. _1 economic hardship because of opt•iors available to the applicant for locating the sign on the Saybrook Lane frontage. 2. There is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstance that does :ot apply generally to other shopping centers located in ccmmercial districts. 3. The granting of this special sign permit r-:quest would con- stitute the granting of a special privilege because an addi- tional .freestanding sign would be allowed on the Davenport Drive frontage. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Paone, Winchell, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAIN: None ITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82-13 t: M. Elora Enterprises, Inc. To permit 3ansion and relocation o _ fisting electronic video game ar cility located at: outheart corner of Center Drive and Street. The public hearing was ope M. Ilora spoke to th ssion to his rcluest and ask for approval. it have a total of ines and possibly will serve dr • n the facility. There w other persons t^ speak for or agains osed use, he public hearing uas closed . fission considered the request. -13- 6-15-82 -- P.C. I �I • �'' /�S of . /6 • f el, /• 4 r7 SIGNS of oedet aaw�■� 272 SOUTH 1 STREET• SAN BERNARWT10. CAIr.71fy'2411)34 pRo9 PH 714 HH5 4476 �''; June 18, 1982 Mayor & Common Council City of Huntington Beach i P 0 Oox 100 j Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 if Re: Planning Cormission Special Sign Permit 082-2 Dear honorable Mayer and Council Members: Please accept this letter as our request to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission for the installation of one freestanding sign. Action was taken by the Planning Commission on June 15, 1982. ' Please advise date of this appeal hearing. Our check for i $165.00 is enclosed herewith. Sincerely, QUIEL BROS. ELECTRIC SIGN SERVICE CO. , IN . 7Gorrdon Quiel Vice President GQAw enc. i i SALES • SERVICE LEASING MAINTENANCI: STORE FRONTS t',�hf f:nnNro fm� 1 . rnu• Nn :I 1 f•14 terry Pvblish 718[82 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMI7 082-2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 19th day of _ ifuly , 19 82 • for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 82-2 on June 15, 1982. Special Sign Permit No. 82-2 is a request to permit an additional free-standing sign on D mnport Drive in lieu of the one free-standing sign per site per street frontage allowed. The subject property is located in the Huntington Harbour Shcpping Center at Algonquin Street and Davenport Drive in the C4 (Highway Commercial District.) A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. Further information may be obtained from the Development Services Department. Ir I 11 All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said � 9 anneal j Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 BATED J� ��,�„ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEME PUBLIC HEARING ITEM .. , �J�4&.r,�gfly.�� l TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: � Z FROM: L&m.l•.f�Gi�11�r.�1jj1LCtl✓ PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC NEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FUR THEfA g DAY OF �..j-.--f� l yq z_ i AP's are attached � r AP's will follow No AP's i Initiated by: Planning Coamission Planning Department Petition * Appeal _ Other ! Adoption of Environmental Status (x) YES ( 1 Refer to — YQ� Planning Dcpartmont - Extenel.on # for additions! information. * If a eel, please transmit exact warding to be required �_ Sin the legal. �•! 4�(l�<<..�. � �fU , - c.��.,/,s��-ry . 1 :��.11vti-s-n/L► �t•,i.�..� .� /�:� G.et� : `► c t G vr� /�J ► '2.. . ct•. r lD .'.+��✓h %.�� SIGNS BY df utr.�e `r=A=ta 272 SOUTH I STREET, SAN ©ERNARDgb, Vom1,IEV2410 8Rp PH. 714•885.4476 June 18, 1982 Mayor & Common Council City of Huntington Beach P 0 Box 190 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 RP: Planning Commission Special Sign Permit #82-2 I I Dear Honorable Mayor and Counci; Members: Please accept this letter as our request to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission for the installation of one freestanding sign. Action was taken by the Planning Commission on tune 15, 1982. Please advise date of this appe.n] hearing. Our check for i $165.00 is enclosed herewith. Ili Sincerely, i QUIEL BROS. ELECTRIC SIGN SERVICE CO. , IN . 'Gordon Quiel Vice President GPI/kw enc. ruc+witzmntasauautttattt SALES • SERVICE • LEASING - MAINTENANCE STORE FRONTS Carl.Contractnis License No. 2173.15 )34-160-45 934-160-61 4)hn C Walker Unia J Usuuum _6866 Algonquin street May 11,iAl 19b; Knit tit-1 16778 AI(jmjuin Sttue t tunt9ngton Basch, Calif May 11, 19E3J. (ill) tiuntinytm Lx=:h, Calif )2649 92649 i34-160-46 934-160-54 934-160-62qip� M ltit�lcac A Vbnw R i*mmn Donald S Saul.scxi !-6868 A19or* n Street 6561 Vespar. Ci.rclu 1677.1 hl('�cxuluiin Stmet lunt*ton Bach, Calif Huntington Lkmcll, Calif IfunL 9264irr;t:ut llc:ach, Calif )2649 92647 ryt'4`i ,34-160-47 934-160-�a rr 934-160-63 ►calm P Hami.lbon Rjibart Van Ca lcar I.irula L S trahat t ; �.0930 Alcio[yquin Street John HlAnor Jr 16770 Alojay uin :strwt wntirwwn Basch, Calif % Millie Manor tluntingt xi Beath, Gtlif i ,2649 B117 lYatieton rvanuu 92649 i j34-160-48 Namalk, Calif 934-160-64 iidkal D Nelson 90650 WrAin U Pamom LSOU aolder>wast Stxeat» 28 Sil leaf itmtingtcn Beach, Calif Irvine, Calif ,2647 92714 134-160-49 934-160-56 934-160-65 dchard 14 Hahn Mark It ElomAn Pawy Kroner _uti26 Algonquin Str .ar. 16786 Algonquin Street 16768 Alyomjuin Stmut umtirK.tcn Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif IMIntitlgtm Beach, Calif ►2649 92649 92649 134--160-50 934-160-57 934-160-66 .;sitter C lligginbWham Mary wittimpf i:dward A Beyer ,502 Ftcadane Avenue 16784 Algonquin Strout 16766 Algcnr;uin Stxoet: ahittier, Calif Huntington Beacht Calif Huntirx3tan Beach, Calif ►WO1 92649 92649 ,44-16D-51 934-160-58 934-16D-67 'atricia D McOalae Stj*umie C Wu ,,d22 1.1,1Miyi,n Strcvt 1�1,1,) i�l ;�,, 1��, StsX!�':t. 1t,761 A1qmpin Strwt ,untin.jtan Beach, Calif 11tssntington Fetch, Calit 11mUngton 13taadi, Calif )2649 92649 92649 � i34-160-52 934-160-5d 934-160-6H 1Ohn Peter u'Uxuu:11 Maas!erne: A Weetxab Nelson 11 Mc Cara4 Jr ,delay A Wallace 17023 Bluawoter loans 16764 Algongu.in Strmt 16820 A19 m quin Street limU ngton Beach, Calif lltunt:inyt on Lkiach, Calif itntimitan Reach, Calif 92649 92649 92649 i34-160-53 934-160-60 934-160--69 -am T Rcech t Alan It Pack Paul itulmim 16318 Algimpain Street 16776 Algamluin St.re6t 3328 Slxrr Blvd. I :1unt.in9bca Beach, Calif Bmt ingtan Beach, Calif Glendale, Calif .. )2649 92649 91,1011 I F 934-160-70 Mbert L Dnink 1A760 Algav uin strmt ' Huntington Dead, Calif Spociai Sian Pmmitu 82-1 92649 May 11, 1982 (Jit I 934-160-71 John s tfysUm. P.O. HOx 188ti i,],ecriowd,Springs, CUmado 00601 -)avid 11. Maloolm :tealtor, Inc. 2111 Shattuck Avcnun iuite 819 i�--zkeley, Calif 94704 f )i 1 i r I i - W I _78-341�8 178-632-13 mw W Sarracino I-sack Jenkins L6712 Sp1brook Lard Spwial Sign Pendt 82-2 1841 San San Gabriel Blvd. tuntingt on Beach, Calif M.Sy n' 1982 (ill) San Gdxria.l, Calif ►3649 91776 i78-341-49 178-632-05 178-632-14 John H Plake Alvin S Flom Harold E Ibbin L69U Saybrook Lahti 16684 Bare fart Circle 5142 Wanwr Ave;nuu luntincltrn Basch, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 2hm ngton Breach, Calif 92649 9d-649 92649 !78-341-50 178-6322-06 178-632-15 la<tes E till William E Plant-Masan Leon Ni Wheeler i 6921 Saybrook i r ne 16686 Barefoot Circle 5551 t',IMIstom Drive luntington Bosch, Calif Huntington B each, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 92649 92649 178-354-01 178-632-07 178-632-16 i sally Nava L=agoitty Peter llayw Hughes sbaras D Keyes 1272 Sillran erivu 16680 Mrarwt: circle 1G732 Barefoot Circle luntiagWn L Mdl, L.-tli t lltUlt,hi ;tcxr i CZI I ! )Ii.lt.irn)trxl Lkkdl, Calif u649 921)49 1)26-19 178-354-25 178-632-08 178-632-17 -harl.es 11 Jones Jr J Lc.:;;t- wy Susu) C l)nnlenty •1261 Tr mb Al Urive 1.600 Wvu St., Sui.tu 130 240 Plausant Smut ,tuntUNuin Lwch, Calif Nedport Bw i, Calif Pasadena, Calif 92649 92660 91101 178-354-26 17LI-632-09 17t)-632-18 , r'aul C Landera William A Smith l~lar'y El.lW De Each , 4271 Truct>LXr1'1 Drive 16695 !barefoot Circle 16742 Barefoot Circle lluntirmbon Beach, Calif Huntington Mach, Calif HMtLnyban Lhwch, Calif 92649 92649 92649 l71-354-27 178-632-10 178-632-19 { Anthony J Libarbo David L Jacksm Ridbrd R Arty I=y 4281. Trumbull Drive 16701 Barefoot Circle 16746 Barefoot Circle { lhmunpon Beach, Calif HuntiNtau Bete, Calif Huntington fthch, Calif 92649. 921649 92649 176-630-02 178-632-11 178-632-20 lbzsan A Betkor l Doric Ptxaa .s Daryl S Phillips Aopcla Oonnstnrtirn Co. 16705 9aruforot Circle 3622 Pirate Circle t 70 1.rtrn, Calif 92635 9ma Rd 6 9 c1gton Aea h, Calif 9hm4tintjt,on bwdx, Calif I 178-632-04 1 178-632-L? 178-632-21 Dw3oty H tbls Thomas L Alliavn Mark Davis 16682 Barefoot Circle 3500 AaselxxIge Drive 16756 Barefoot Circle llunt..ington H adi, Calif Fullertran, Calif 92635 1lL Ungton Duach, Calif { 9xG,i9 92649 i i ti I 178-632-22 170-632-51 Axold J M=iscn Special sign Permit 82-2 Jdtn D Yeast 16762 Barefoot Circle May 11, 1982 (JU) 4485 Outrigger Circle, H%mtintjtnn Beach, Calif Nunting M Beach, Calif 92649 92649 178-632-23 178-632-31 178-632-52 Jean Z Schmidt Ric haxd M Kaefar Orlando A VLuw 16766 Barefoot CUrle 16741 Barefoot C:lrcl© 4481 Outrigger Circle Uunti,ngttan Brach, Calif fluntingtun Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 92649 92649 178-632-24 178-632-32 178-632-53 Ara Click 'titvin welt) Marrow i22i1 Park ;A-vaort Urivu 1u7I) i"j:ul x)L CirCR! V.U. 1tU>; 223G :4ewpxxrt tit, Calif Iiurtlingtan Beach, Calif !hinting on 1l9aC11, Calif 92660 92649 92647 178-632-25 17E1-632-33 178-632-54 Willi= J 0,a+good Marie K Uxklun ItwxB Wagner 16771 Barefoot Circle 16731 BarQfnat Circle 4471 Outrigger Circle fluntinyton Bch, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington lku+rh, Calif 92649 92649 92649 178-632-26 178-632-34 178-632-55 Virgil R Rd mndson JIudith A Lirtdua r fit== J 11encfertxxt 16765 Barefaoot Circle 16725 Castamay Lone Unit 50 4465 Outrigger Circle Ituntit gt3l Beach, Calif Iftntingtaon Beach, Calif Itunti,ncjton 0=h, Calif 92649 92649 92649 178-632-27 178-632-35 178-632-56 ' Marlwe A Ccawfoird M�cr+y M C.i*Ii o Batty J Hann 16761.earefoot Circle 16721 Carrtasmy Labe P.O. Box 1091 HtntingtM HDac:I e Calif Hunt ingwn Beach, Calif )XIntington Duach, Calif 92649 92649 92647 178-632-20 178-632-40 178-632-57 Ceoxge J Janco* ftay M &Ikxu % at al Louis A gzdt c/o Mint Wocd 5412 Tattarshall Avenuu 4455 Outrigger Circle 18231 Ivorycriest Late wastndrtster" Calif Iluntirejtan tloadt, Calif H�gtM Bauch, Calif 96G48 92683 92649 f i 17B--632-29 178-632-49 178-632-SB Ft9xrrt W. Taylor CearW L Lundberg David 0*m 16751 Barefoot Circle the centoary Plaza c/o Crisell Caohoe & Co + Hunt ygtan fit, Calif Suite 1400 444 W. Ocaaan Blvd. 11416 i 92649 Ins Annals, Calif 90067 immj Eleach, relit 90802 SCAR 178-632-30 170--632-50 179-632-59 16792 Q�*ha LawRa'�4 C Sutor Will.lzttn 0 Callmay 4491 OutrigW Circle 4461 Boardwalk Drivu IfuntingbM >3each, Calif Huntingtan Bich, Calif Iiuntington Lech, Calif 92649 92649 92649 .78-632-60 934-160-12 arrothy D Stitzinjer Barr-vial Sign P nnit 82-2 Russell Morgan .8310 iwach Blvd. may 11, 1982 4919 Bruce Crescent Drive !urtirxltan LI-sa:1i, alit Na4)ort Beach , Calif `):GG3 _70-632-61 93.1-160-04 934-160-13 r.tfurt Lanqur et al ,Taira, A TtIl im JAM110 A iiUJlx:s a71 t 11: 1�rivu 16730 A1�,cb�;uir� Street 16750 AltIcniu x--:in :;Lrt , j 471 t "rdtcmi t3c�:ici), c:al.it Huiiti ujum beaclo, Calif 11uriLbi3tai 1k!uch, Calif:unt 1 ,M9 92649 92649 78-632-62 934--160r09 9 34-160-14 'saes M 6leints at al Mristirw A D-m12i- Howard T Gilroy .O. Box 8537 16732 Algonquin Strmt 16748 Algonquin Stsebt nuntain valley, Calif Huntington taea::li, Calif liuntingtun bcach, Calif ,2702 92649 92649 _78-632-63 934-160-06 934-160-15 ,a France E Terrell Jr Elizabeth A Butler William G Clause � 4;i1 Boauxtalk Drive 16734 Algmxpin Street 7001 N Shawnee i cuntirx3txn iieatrh, Calif HUnti.ngton Reecho Calif Oklahaona City Ol lahcum j 92649 92649 731.16 ;78-632-64 934-160-07 934-160-16 .urar, L Bounds at al Raymond L. Guttanma Victoria Stamat 0485 bmudwWk Drive 16736 Algonquin Street L-142 MwJWUiur Way ,untington Beach, Calif Huntington beach, Calif 92649 Uuma Park, Calif 92649 90620 i34-160-01 934-160-08 934-160-17 mald Ferand lli M iatim Worth Suean J Momm .6724 Algonquin Street 16730 Alcpmuin Street 16788 Aly;xYp n strur:t :untingbcan Ar ac. , Calif [iuntingtan Mach, Cal.i.r Huntington Boadi, calif t2649 92649 92649 134-160-02 934-160-09 934-160-18 Jeffrey S SilvermAth L)AWAI t Itxwtz Kelly Snow .026 Algarrquin Street 16 16790 Alc3cxx;uin Strout luntington Beiac h, Calif I 1Q {if lluntirvjtan Lk)ach, Calif 92649 920U49 98649 134-160-03 934-160-10 934-160--09 'rank Frate Bertina M Sipan David L Shultz :6728 Alganquin Street 16742 Algonquin Street 16740 Algo[11 itn Street iuntintit n Beack Calif Huntington Beach, Calif �2649 92649 Huntington Beach, C�.tf 92649 04-160-04 934-160--11 934-160-10 Jomph E Rival Charl M Wagner 16900 F.dgawater Lama 16792 A19cr urn Street llLmUn Eton !leach, Calif Huntington Bwch, Calif 92649 92649 1:4-160-20 Sl 934-16U-37 twWd A Olbikuu3 x:ci.t1 Sim Vomit tit-� _6794 Algoryluin Street May 11, 1962 (XI) Billy D Sdiul o xt ►unti.miton Boacll, Calif 23140 !hiss Street ►2649 I bcx.ltacxl !fills, Calif 913b4 ' -34-160-21 934-160-29 934-160•-38 Glynn Hatl:ey Gary L Amclamon Lead Uladjiml ;565 W ndsp n Drive 16834 Plclarnluin Strtix:t t)802 Kinqu ltatrlx)r Drive untington Beach, Calif 11unt.irtc3taan Mach, Calif Rancho Palos Verdes, calif ;2649 92649 90274 t34-160-22 E Ribal 934-160-�39 'c�selai7� 934--160-30 John P 6906 Edgenmtor Laura Iieciel O�talry 21 F l Estate2 tuntimAm Beach, Calif 8452 lain Circle Jerry O*er 12649+% Hm-JxQton Beach, Calif 15802 Sprijuldale Street:92646 1".0. am (15 )34-160-23 934-160-31 IRIntingtcn Bear-hi Calif Iilliam Cawfbetll Carl Fredric Laidcia 92649 _6812 Algonquin Street luntingtcn Beach, Calif 16838 Algonquin Street __-____...._—------. .._�_ !2649 it, atingban I3aarh, Calif , 9: 549 )34-160-24 934-160-,32 934-160-40 lack L Paaanti Jerome A Golding Marty Stacy et al ,902 Nyanza Drive 16840 Alganquin Street c,/o Ooun elor tiealty tuntington Beach, Calif Huntington Mach, Calif 2120 Main Stmut 2647 92649 10ntin4taon Brach, Calif 92648 )34-160-25 I talus �' lfewim 934-160-33 934-160-41 � 16808 Algonquin Street Mill D !softy t3alcirin iuntington Beac h# Cal.�f 16820 Algot-quin Street 16058 Alc c luin Streit 2649 11mUngtyon BE+ac.I11 Calif Ili! ungbon l3 w,, Calif 92649 92649 )34-160-26 934-160,,34 934-160-42 P Barry Aobet't» E Attebar y 3592 Serene Drive �� Carpenter� 16860 Al Street )64tun99 tm Beach, Calif Wjodland Ul.l.s, Calif Huitirr3bon Bead!, Calif 91364 92649 )34-16L%--27 I :)m ld R Morris 934-160-35 934-160"3 16804 Al.3anluin Street Russell G Adauso n Barbara Ann Litton :ltntingt�cn Beach, Wif 9142 Forbes Avenue16862 Alc,)oaltluin Street •)2649 Sc;,ulvt_-da, Calif lltlntilltj-tt>n IkItl ll, COW 91343 92649 � I 934-160-28 934-lal,-•36 934-160-44 dwstcr C Simms W rL1wuw t.' Mitxx (dc lutnt H hk�lullin 16761 13.:leru Leine 16db-' A1k)oli iuiu -i( legit 101t6v M(PIVjuin StrIx?L l:untir, a Wach, Calif lltlriLhl•-Uxl I(it I". tell, Calif i 7E1•-204-19 178-341-39 earY J saybi Special Sign Pendt 82-2 Ooast; Level+olme»t Co. 7001 Malta Circle may 11, 1902 (JH) 241 Grand Avenue unt.ingt7on Beach, Ca1.ff Lorry buoh, Calif 2649 90003 78-2B4-20 198-341--31 178-341-40 anh7% Jennings J W McClain Jougjli It Gwttl� r 7011 Malta ircla 16892 Harkness Circle 16821 5ayl:=xtk Larx unt+ingUn Beach, Calif Huntington Hearn, Calif Iluntiryjtui wa-ch, ('.cil.if 2649 92649 92649 78-284-21 178-341-32 170-341-41 ..xurld E Stiles Philip 0 Hayrm Charlw. N Wult ti 7021 Malta Circle 16882 lluimas Circl+a 1G831 Sayluxxrk l.uti tnt.i.ngton Beach, Ca if Hcrttingt m beach, Calif I ntintftor Imadt, kalif j 2649 92649 92649 i 78-2E14-33 178-341-33 178--341-42 o=an D Wiener De�nj=in Kroll A Start A"mjus 7022 Ooutctnsy Lorna' 16872 Harkness Circle 16841 Saybr ok iaww untia0m Beach, Call f Huntington Beach, Cz.1if RmUntjbon axwh, Calif 2649 92649 92649 � 7t1-284-34 178-•341-34 178-341 .43 ich aml R Thomas Jr Henry T Schaffner Jr Robert L SirWa n 7012 Cour way Lat'>e' 1.6862 11arxne" Oxcle 16051 Saltwook Lww untingt on Beach., Calif Huntington Baad,, Calif Huntington tlanch, Calif 2649 92649 92649 7ts-284--35 17G-341-35 178-341-44 ,1)ert A Avow Leo B Gill Jr H®ndrix R Bull 7002 Owrb y Late 16852 Haz'rauess Circle 16861 Sayluriak law, .Mtiangtor, Beach, Calif hantin(iban Beach. Calif llunt.ing= Beach, Calif 2649 92649 92649 78-341-29 178-341-36 17fl-341-45 Aynold T Jotuisol Edward Alosio KmwE3t L Ik)Lite:s ,,911 tlarknw:ss Circle 16842 llarluk ys Circle 1071. Saybrtxik IAw-*2 antiniton Beads, Calif Ilts itirniton De ch, Calif IluntijiljUn twch, Calif 2649 92647 921041) �1 78-341-29 178-•341- 7 178 • 1-11- it) loin J lbwr= Jolut I: :suit,. I).tri;...-r., A Roijaw 6912 11arkness Circle .1633.: it.irl.rt"s C-ircle 16881 Saybrook Lww .untf gton I3 evil, wlit. Iltstttan;ttrat w%,Ach, calif Hunkfn(jtan Iksii t, Calif 2649 92649 92649 78-341-30 178-341-38 178-341-47 lox't< m L PaLtxar Dwald A Sgg1mton David E Moore 6902 Harkness Circle 16822 Hadams Circle 16891 Saytrrm* Law untington Bekbdh, Cali Huntington Lwdis Calif llunt.ipyt on i, Calif. 2649 92649 92649 i ' 17u-�81-U1 juiel Bros. ,,ttn-. Nancy Snell. Special Sicp� PernLit 82-L IU99l 1�.11 lci l: :il .►72 ,Huth 1 Strut lua� CItLl��t' ;an �, Calif 9264911�11tR1 lic:,1►a1, l'.1111 J1641 t )2410 170-273-03 178-1U1- 02 'ad.fiC Placiaral $,aviricxs 4 wanR ulitho Jors�ltx J GrLY:11I.P:V t 101 Borth "E" Stxwt 1698 lAxall Circle 17011 Lowcsll C:irclo ;an Bernardino, Calif Huntington Beads, Calif Ilunti utcX1 Wadi, C-11 i1 )2403 -, 92649 ..9b4y pacific SOutflweet Malty 00. 178-273-04 17B-2Ul-06 • 0. H= 2097 'bean. Annex E%vdarick G Mutcn Steom R Larrabtw 16%2 Lowell Circle 17002 Sayumok Lux: .Ou Angeles, Calif 11mti ngtm baadi, Calif Huntington lXwh, Calif 10051 92649 92649 L78-271-03 178-273-05 178-281-07 :layton L Solum Rawactl Lxtararicias Ltc Mirk 1i Shurtiuff _/e Cliarles Dunn Co. c/o Darrell L Jck-imm 16992 Sayhr ok Ls w .200 Wilshire Blvd.f 205 2049 Can=y Paris East Huntingl= Beach, Calif ,os Angeles, Calif 90017 Suits 1000 92649 179-271-04 Los Angeles, Calif 178-202-01 �unih Iiatib 90067 Jerzy L Gram j722 Lawn daven Drive -- - -- -- -- 17001 Courtney Law 1untimitcn kieach, Calif 11untiw ton Lkmh, Calif 12648 '12t;i�i t78-171-01 17d-27J-06 176-2d2-02 :.bn Ilatauldta SU3Wiai S t>n j 'I'akuji 'I't+ kUV .6991 Malta Circle 1071 Lowull Circle 17011 Lutirtrluy Lulu 1u11ti.natun Dead), Callil 111vitlll"ttAl C.Iht 11lull:ilP;t.Cx1 1Y?;1�:11, Calif 178-272-03 17d--w 73.07 178-282-21 { -.atriqute G a-a ig William J Risaalain Vitltx:tnt R 'ItcVM t 3922 Sirius Drive Maria Risocnain 17012 Lowell circle luntington Deach, Calif 16972 Saybrook Lwlo ll ntinybon bwdi, Calif 12649 Iiuntingb n 1iaad1, Calif 92649 21649 178-273-01 178-273-08 178-287-22 .lanique Pirseda Albart It 11W Verm Eldon William 16571 Ca:vauel Lana 16952 Saybrook Lane 17002 Lowell Circle .1untinytai ,��--...; Calif tits Ungbon LWch, Calif 11untington Ikjach► Calif 12649 92649 92649 17&-273-02 176-273-09 178-282-23 10=M L hhipple N=Pm A ZZSabye Nonnan I, Mvwy 16991 Courtrai Lane 16942 Saybrook Lane Matti Walker final ty lutntingt+on Beach, Calif I mUjvjton 13sad1, Calif 17171 Uea►ch !Blvd 12649 92649 lltnti.rrlton bteu di, caur 92647 i I tr+ttttt Superior Court txrdz STATE OF CAUFORHIA to Gad for tba County of Onro CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PLANNING CONNISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SOCoac of f" to, I APRIL Le ELLIOTT That I am and at all times,herein mentioned was,a ritiren of i the t1nited.State*,met the age of t.renly•une year*.and that 1 am rNot a party ter,rim intere.ted in the alrive entitled matter; t) that 1 am the principal clerk of the printer of the �+ { HUNTINGTDN BEACH IND. REV. a ! a newepeper of Reriorel cirrulatNm,pohhs,hnl uo the t'oly nt HUNTINGTON BEACH ICounty of Orsnar aril *huh neemimper is, pubbd►ad taw the disetoirtation of local newt and intelliRecce of a grr+eta)chuac• tar,and which nowsp W at all Liam Main meationed had and W11 W a bona fide subscriptkn list of paying wbtKribe s, and which newepaper hsa boon astabiished.printed and pub• liabed at regular iotervah in the"W County of Orarye for a period ausedire one year, that the notice. of which the annated 6 a printed copy.has boon published in the eegulu and entire iraw of said newspaper,and not in any supplement thereof.an the folbariry dates,to wit; JUNE 5r 1982 E J,• 1 svrtify lot declare)undx penally of perjury that the toregoa ley is Nuo and tvrrKL Detedat.....RARDEN, QROVE...................... California."TIP. &,Q( JUNK,.is.82 Asr 1 L. Fj 1.iMtt Sigaatura r.«.ra ur.10.3r0 II w V\ LAYCITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 11 4; 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFF.'CE OF THE CITY CLERK a July 20, 1982 i Quiel Brothers Sign Company 272 South "I" Street San Bernardino, CA. 92410 Attn: Gordon Quiel, Vice President The City Council of #)e City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held July 19, 1982, denied your appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of special Sign Permit 82-2. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from July 200 1982 to apply to the courts for judicial review. Please contact the department of Development Services, If you have any questions - 536-5271. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk ANW:CB:bt CC: Pacific federal Savings, 701 N. "C" Street, San Bernardino Jim Palin, Department of Development Services Gail Hutton, City Attorney (Tiiiphona,7/461�Z27f f a f/ roj_ CITY OF HUNI"i"'11"V1G7'ON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK April 8, 1982 i Martin Communications, Inc. 1888 Century Park East Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90067 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held April 5, 1982 denied your appeal filed to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 81-8. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to pro- visions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from April 8, 1982 to apply to the courts for Judicial review. If you have any questions, please call this office - 536-5227. i Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:cd Enclosure cc: Jim Palin, Director Development services Gail Hutton, City Attorney Mlephane:714-536.52271 it J? ' tI So W� .1 ► § 1094.5 Si►ECiAL 1►11()CERDINCS fort I ;�. Nall: 378 wimilyd for flow trial de- uotfi. 1'rr•tn,l +. adns-d rs.1w '•.inlee-r had fir jet ri•dirlIntl 4i1,, 1'nllh+ridn 1'tunl:plrnuu'IU IIIm, ,\ppral, C.I. :tad did 111.4 d••Irrlaiat-hfrril,. \Cralrne.\it- t/ (19,16) 1.'i 1't1l.11lflr. A111, :ti 1'..\.::.I 29. Litter tell-. %. .1-:11hi.••ki 11!'till I�' l'nl.11l•Ir. 'rrinl ronrl'ts jndKon1 le• drlothls: writ fif 'lt' 11111'.,\.Jda:+!►. l nlnudnlr it, rfinilio orrotor for ngrt,outer.• fait Ihnt Irllrr di•.rtlnrcitts; r:rninr lYp• • �} In sort nolGl.• him tlrrdrinn rrtnl,int: Itownn. w rl••rt, in odfir,• rr o rfiaot o lerk .int.•,1 ✓'to.w rr'M Ill I-limelots nirrrtl(1 1111111 Its hlomittr.m 1.1 I11:+1 ,ill- +1a• enill for eln•r.•eldrlrt in tr. s proof rmlogrnl u'nm rr1'rriowd fuel r:oat- ro• elalthlt: puhlil- raofinl. Ir.•m flit- filr, and r atntulrot to trial rofitrl uith silror•li.,um to, 11011I alint: :r1rl •rrrrli•:; 11tt•111 fill tnrirns rrmawl mace to dlrovlor flit pltrluf•o• of d:rlrm, 1+Irn.t. in hratu:_ brhom rnfltly ' re-enu.sidrrion tilt- prloloily lorr=iomly list. rhil m.•r=i.•s• r.nnmi.•inn rti.b•nrr ant in• i p•lttrd, ahrro It watt fntiud 111:11 •only fi( Irosolrlrrd finl.k n. fit wl,m rosfil, plarto file r Ili.• erlllorcrlo rignitll•t i+rittirltler wrre ill,[ 4-114, to( tilt- r.•quirr• It,,- di.. Z.�: ►nplatrlyd hlr rvidrnt r. wIle;(irl•l II Is I l•loslrl 4.1 aistwal I'll it I,-n) (11•111 judo: n Ilirn•Inr of Ardoillltrr 11117*'1 Ill:t (*ill. tarot a,tardiu;; •t•ni.or Iela.i tlrrk writ U( r t�, Cplr,Ir1U.."11',A.:1dLtit(1. umntWtr, nfirr trlr•r.iny: Of- iuil mrpl lei tt Prot•rrelile� for review of denial loy rfim• Ihr .nprrio.r fr.tlrl, to- rrin.ursl life- twil:rr r le ills, 1-1•uui•.ifiu (fir rs•.nnshlrtntimt, { miss.Irltler of rnrpnrnlimltt 4 prrmil to uIll,re lis.re- 1%11% n 0 11111 1 61% 14 fnria oar r►Yelen l tnok r hlo tlight it or rrrlmhh•rm '•` rfiaudin� rrnl.•ta) of h .'••.unlrul•s fin all lrouid be- rrtunndrtl to 1 oprrinr f 1n1rt far Ir to( llte Ja1rn, I'rnll t. I.t.. ,\fir 11••+t Talon• ' drtertnlnnlinll whelllrr liters- o%-Ix .uh.1:111• l.•' 1� t'itir �rrlit-r 1'nnnui••miou Iills'J1 ' :'i 41 , 1., ,' lint I.lhtrrtrr to lsgpporl r..nuni.-1 llrr'+f '. fiuflio�a, role rc ronrl Imprrrprrlr drlrr• 1094.6. tlUdIrinl roview; decietions of Inrni ngetit lei; petition; filing; tine; record; decision ntid pnrly defined; or- '+� 1•? �y• ., dinunre or rv.-Atifion �t,k (n) AidIclnl review of:In}' decision of a Ilwal agpncr, other than schnol distriel, ns the term locnl ngeney is dcfitim in section 5.11151 of the Government Code, or or rim' com{nissirn{, board, offiver or ngent fit- ••cote may he hnd pumunnt to Section 10M.5 of this code only if f :r the pelitfon for writ of mitn(Inle putsuant ill such section Is filed e r► \rithin the line limits specified in this section. (b) Any such petition shrill he filed nut later than the 901h day l•iI� following llte ditto an which :he dtcision becon\cs finnl. If there is no I,,h't,;.' provision for reconsideration of the decision in nay oplilic.able prorl• 1 Sion of any stntute, chni'ter. or rule, for flit, purposes of this sectirr.r. i �.� ' ' the decision is (inn] on the (life it is rnntle. If there is such provisinn ly rot' reconsideration. the decision is final to,. the purpose:: of this see- ; 5 lion tlpnn the expiration of Ihr period during which such reconsidera- • ti n can be sought; provided, that it reconsideration is sought purs\i• rltit to any such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this +iY ,r•�� ', :wr.lion on flip d,tle flint reconsilleralinn is rejected. � .fI.1 i'IIe cnu1l11e1i• rry'nt•rl of Ihi' ln•rn•rrllinls sh:lll Ill• prrpat•c/l by i '►;%�} Ills' hwal rll,rlivy ill- its I.111111111.1�1 i1111, hn,ll'11, Ittliet'r, I11• r11,N111 wllicil t�' r•• urtfie the ilrc'isinn a1111 shall his III•liccrrfl Ili the pelitinner within !NI i~.a•' llays lifipc hp has filed a wrilleu evilltrsl fhelrfilr. 'Tile Inral agenrV may rec'ovcr froin the Ilcillinnvi, its acltial curls for linn•;rribing or Mhetwise preparing the record. `tick record shall inclurhr the U.1n• tl : rapt of the- piorcedinr-., fill iilr;IrlinGc, .111 nntil•es anll I-r(lrr•s. and• proposed decision by it hiraring urricer•, Ihr final decision, .111 adlililtctl CiTl 1 ,t•,}(�t,�,f�•yrr-.1.••r .,•, .� , r•� •t� • `,, 11•'�1" 1� ��� ' ''r.,/ ' ,'C I + •'t�,,,y t•: '1'I�•,r•f; .1• tf�l►Is '•l„1 '��. .,�r�•It„1�'•'` `�' • .. r.yM iiit rye: Tine 1 WRIT of MANDATE § 1094.6 exhibilc, aii rejected exhibits In file possession of the local agency or =� Its cnnrmicvion, board, otfirer, or agent, all written evidence. and and• ) ' other papers In the tease. M (rl) If the petitioner nuts it refines i for the revord as .swrvirivil in f't' sltlnlivisif►u ll•) wilhill 10 days arlrr the dale Ihr tltti-isinit iivroines ti- �• nal as provideO In "11611viti1011 (111, the lhuts \\'i(Ilirl which :1 ilMiNflit pur•stlant In Set-lion 101-1.5 may he filer) .011111 liv exlendrrl In lull tiler ' than the 30Ih day following the ]tale on which the revord is either � Personally delivered or milled to the petitioner or his attorney of rev.- ord, if he has one. ''•r ' (c) As user] In this section, decision means ndjudientory ndmin- istrative decision made, nf(cr hearing, suspending, dellrnting, or dis• ' missing an ottiver or employee, revoking or denying sn application for a permit or n license, or denying an application for any retire- ment benefit or nilomince. (f) In making n final decision as defined in subdivision (e), the local ngeney shalt provide notice to the Party that the time within ti Mellish j11111rinl review teats;t be sought is governed Iiy this;section. As used in this subdivision, "party" menns nit officer or cm- denlnted or flis nix cd• a personplover who has been suspended, •• whrne permit or IlLense has been revoked or whose nppiiention for n •� f •o; permit m• license has been denier]: or n person whose application for a rrtircmcnl benefit nr allo\vanrc has been denirrit r•► rr W This section shall be applicable in n lornl agency only if the fi1 governing board thereof adopts an ordinance or resolution ranking this scr1(on applicable. if surh ordinance or resolution Is adopted, the provisions of this section shall prevail over any conflicting provision {� In any othei•\vise npplicabie law relating to the subject matter. t Added 1•y Stnt-4.19w,r.276,p.Rio,S 1.) �,�, •�1'.t Forms ;ire WeNt'r f'r1111nr►tln 1'tvlr Fnrttty,I•It{l 11rnr"1111r. '• T• Library References 'S \ t• Arlminlrirmhe Leta• and 1^rt•tr.inr• ('..1.';. t•uhlle Adntinl•Iralt.e• ltndlrit cold t ••I i Note• of Veciclon. In general ( 16ef pnblh rmpLtrtnrut rrhtllntt., 1«card " rj Etllautllntt of adrr.Initlrallve ttnledir♦ 2 i,n,l rtrhnitr itfti•dirlintt In $I,•trrnlinr ttltrlrvr tilt- uuLtir prnrlhr rbnrl•.t•v »err �1 jtlrliflt•tl: ntal, la %lew 14 Irnrhrr+' failnrt• In rtlamvl tltrlr ntitnini.trntiu• n•utrtlit•v I. 1, In general uhtlrr lilt, Irtvlda Arl• trial roam rr►t••1 ill jj �rhn..l 'Iv.unl•r tmilmPrnl frtrrini: ill Crauting writ Ili mattthW too r„rnlrr•I •nl,rr. r h:p•In•t.' ttalitiry trfter 1writtaluC +•I nv%% inlrn.h•It1 etf di+ltirt ;tuts t.lhrry it. rill,tr yrhu,tl %rttr, tthllr #•,]dell) urr•tl it,tI.mv val:tlh•v urrt•tl„it, b:ul •I, .\nrtr.l.,r Viol. t. .err• p,•q,ltlq„ ntrtlahh still nu 1114:11r It•c �rtiartl..•t 1',hr•alt•r. A\ 'u ,, \'ratio t'• �rnrlity h, ►hdalh.n Ill Ile,• ri.nlrin At•1 nil ' ' tL 1 (Lli,ll Ial 1',tl.liptr. 7:1, �� 1'..\.:;I �:•I. a ('t7rs .f Fri-NMI t� fa '.1,. tr •, �1 ' •I r F. 't. �• ,.r•-e ': �:�!`I.1�•r�•� i't � .- t ••rt .i�+ •�7J•.•'•, '�►'',t t..• ------- ..+...-.......... ++..•wow . .•.tb.•1•.t.•n'•,•�••+•t ggrt + • �!•1ti.�. i -T INTIIF: 1,I Superior Caurt wv OFTNB STAFF OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of(Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHr _ PBOO-OFP11,1)WcA1•0.19 CITY CLERK NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING State of California 1 llDllC>6Of�1Ir3Ct Q1►w1?i.tl County of Orange 1 M011 NCr lFi �r Jeannie L. Thomas 00 PW That I am and at all time+herein mentioned was a citizen of jthe United States.over the age of twenty-one yenry.and that I 43 ;t ! am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; 1*1 oil �f that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the '�et�slbtiaYr�wat aW ylt,�a 1G} iaMlprl b"aria"isW tw.«xalta•f� Huntington Beach Ind. Reivew ea rwi 1 a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of ': � lr�yMSiafn Huntington Beach r , County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the `kW '�; t disetnination of local news and intelligence o(a general charac• Willi ".4 "JillI ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona tide subscription list of p,%yi.,K subscribers, I)Isis tlusst and which newspaper has been established,printed and pub. lisped at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for it ' ry Of r' y� rJ.�lbi;AR1l�; period exceeding one year, that the notice, of which the .. �.,.�•.,,..,.��,,. ,i annexed is a printed copy,has been published in the regular trlat+lic .; c�ru..,i ti-;, and entire issue of said newspaper,and net in anv supplement ; Nw►1 13tseh„ war:�tIW01, „ thereof,on the following dates,to wit: March 25, 1982 certify for declare)under penalty of perjury that the forego. I ing is true and correct. { Datedat. .$t gn..Gr.Q,Y.Q.......................... ornia,this 26:t.h.day o(M a�j.s. 19.. 2. a , 1 Signature I 1 J Publish 3/25/82 r i i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO 81-0 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:3t, P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on ay the 5th _ day of April �, 1982 . for the purpose of considering an appeal filed to the Planning Commission's denial i of Special Sign Permit #81-8, a request to permit a 200 sq. ft. existing subdivision directional sign to continue to be located on vacant property on the west side of Beach Boulevard, approximately 75 feet south of Damask Drive. Property is zoned C4 (Highway Commercial District). A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. r ( i { All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their { opinions for or against said appeal i Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED 3/4/82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk t Publish 3/25/82 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO 81-8 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, j Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:3G P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on _...__-Mut day the 5th day of April 1982 . for the purpose of considering an appeal filed to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit #81-8, a request to permit a 200 sq. ft. existing subdivision directional sign to continue to be located on vacant property on the west side of Beach Boulevard, approximately 75 feet south of Damask Drive. Property is zoned C4 (Highway Commercial District). A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. I ' All interested persons are invited to attend said'hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main j Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED 3/4/82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk i • Publish 3125/82 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING APPEAL TO DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO 81-8 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on MondAv the 5th day of April 1982 for the purpose of considering an appeal filed to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit 081-8, a rer+ )pst to permit a 200 sq. ft. existing subdivision directional sign to continue to be located on vacant property on the west side of Beach Boulevard, approximately 75 feet south of Damask Drive. Property is toned C4 (Highway Commercial District). A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. r , i All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 9264E - (714) 536-5227 DATED 3/4/82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk i I Nrrner. 'r0 CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC IIEARINC tT!~FI • c TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: 0Ct.1J�+Cr►tl�' PLEASE. SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE c; DAY OF , I9a x'' 400 W-.-AP's are attached AP s will follow ' 1 Na APs A4 Initiated,by: ' ��� Planning Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) ✓ YES NO Refer to /J•, !'.�C./ Planning Department Extension # for additional information. * If a eeol , please transmit exact wording to he required in the legal . f 1 tN7'ItF Superior Court rt•„tx STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and fur the County of Orange- s - - -- - CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHv PLANNING 1'I�f?i�F ts' � nl .lf•�TloN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING stateo(Californis 1 ('aunty of Orange laa' Jeannie L. Thomas cmu.NOM Noses ter come Irrrnara - �pc�aC�ga,rtcMNy�g�Narl•t That I am snit�t all times herein mentioned was a t ili:en of t, rrNarUvW b iiM1'bl�tsay the United htitea,over the nice of twenty-one years,and That 1 Ca.�ibfn. i/ me � of Daacb. tlalilarolb'loot t)r ern not a party to,not interested In the alMrve entitled matter. tar 6F-W 4 hr-pP��ryp�srs of aoraidu that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the �bTe°'rtJ,arrar��uw�tttPoo"aX04 lL alsrat aa6dirYim awtiaaal WP to Muays b to tmYd as r.taat Huntington Beach Ind. Review .aw.a.taw.rtttaaks `' 2 onaleatab 76 fast wti of DaaeasM a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of Ihfrwe "k I MWI�wA I.W fHi{ r Huntington Beach YOa' ` t''D'r'"""t''D""'� ..at tt,...r.ottb. said kmft W Item at tb Iwo is 1.11111 County of Orange and which newspaper is puhliahed fur the d C am re (Tel w Cft diseminstiun of local news and intelligence of a general charac• H!uomrom ter, and which nrwapaeer at all times herein mentioned had iRta.aady�N and still has a bona fide$111AMptiun list of paying aubacribxre. a�tpttaaa1d�'uW bo�sad asv� t1W and which newspaper has been ertablished,printed and pub• fWar dst84rPariiiit lapR M°P°ssd� lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for to prtvtir pafaratobt an W�yp� period ricrrding one year. that the notice. of which the hwtA.CRYPwdaD+wrtvr�e annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular t Tsto bamNaM 67itttT1. and entire iuue of said newspaper.and nut in any supplement I Illi� tW to door of Pt 1, thrreof,on the following dates,to wit: Tic co 4d1Bs10H Pr►alst< 1MW PALpI fimilary February ao 1982 Nmt. u►ir4.,.lnre__'4,_,_) 1 certify for declare)under penalty of perjury that the forego• ing is true and correct. Uated01.. Gardt;n Grave........................ California.this P*A ,dayof FOA...19..$Z... J.t.wnni.e..l,...Tho.**.*........................ Signature 1 t form No.CAP.sl3s0 MARTIN COMPAUNICATIONS, INC. o ' F'ebruar 24 1982 w-~c rpm y rrt Mpr'< t Huntington beach City Hall r P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: City Clerk RE: SPECIAL SIGN PEM1IT NO. 81-8 City Clerk: Martin Communications, Inc. wishes to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission on February 17, 1982 concerning special sign Permit No. 81-8. ' The said sign is presently being used as a subdivision directional sign, as per the signal permit. The discontinuance of this sign shall create a tremendous burden on the Point Surfside Development, as per the attached letter from the Curtis Development Company, due to sagging sales of a substantial Huntington leach condominium projec�. The project owner is retired and appreciates the additional income from the property, as she would rather not develop this property at this time. A development would block the neighboring property far more than is contended of our sign by the restaurant owner. The sign is set back from the street 60 feet and partially obstructs the side of the restaurant. 'there are no identification siuns on the side l of the building, as t`ie restaurant owner has an identification sign fronting the strecl . Martin Communications, In purchased the sign a little over a year ago, paying three yea.L ' ncome for the location. Martin Communications subsequently U, --ided the structure by painting the base. Martin Conununicatio -rould like to avoid a loss of over half the investment for this ication. i 1t1�E1 l't:rtcwr•' Piwr l .r..l / Swlt? P DD / Luc Ariget 5. Cralrkurob 90067 / 216 - 557-J/, . 1 Huntington Beach City ball February 24, 1982 page 2 Martin Communications, Inc. realizes there is a noncompliance i concerning the size of this directional sign and plead with the 11 City Council to use a traditional grandfather clause approach in deciding the appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, I Thomas B. Martin 'resident TBM/sg Enclosure I i I� i r � _____________________i --__'-__---___.._________- I � ' � I �jA• � Pariait 81-8 JaMMY 19, 1982 (M) I I 1 r � - - - - - - - - - j _ _ - ., - -- -- - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- ---- --- -- - - 107-100-77 1 The`m L h*6nmn ' 16911-A-3trraet ' I 1 H Untirgton Ammh, Calif ' r 92647 ' 1 z42-191-oi1-------------- -------------r----------------- -------- ,-Instld P JOnna 1 107-691-22 ' ' John C G1m'ta oM :7931�Brircp i 1432 W Sty A%*usw I iltnti 4Wn b=h, Call 92647 92 t . Calif 142-191-27647 -- - - - - - - - - - - - -' - - -- - - - - -- ----- - --•-- j• - - - - - - ---------- ------- 142-481-il All sInio Day JAM � Pmd Lahrtar Inm of 1 hntingtnon beach, CaII 1 Amorist Ina r y2648 , 6770 JAko zLIUVC Dr ' _ _ OorLWIJ4, FlaridA 32809 ; :07 200-70 -`_------- __-- _------------- ----- _..__ __ +- ---------------------- .73A* R Staw xt ' 1 1 P-0. Brent 248 I 1 -An Andro", Calif ' + )5245 ' 1 1 107-100�-72 - -'_____-_-_;_____-----„--- _____ .._-__I-__-_-__________________- :a verity Pecific Bu* :'►hors]. TZU&t ; ^ax Divieian 005-2-00567-0 t'.O. b= bOd02 ' I � _-___--_- _..�-- - ---•--- ------------ --- ------------------------ ,o0ao 1 1 1 1 - - __--__------ - --__- I ------- ------_ I :�192 �.► Lanita Ada@ 1 ------------ - -- -weds ! 1.6901 A Straat I ILMtirgton bom h, Calif +:547 1 1 ----- __-__- --__-� ------ ---------------- ,_- __-___ -_T 1 1 1 I ir 1 i 1 + i Martin 04mun"tiom Lrc ' Amidnt 1888 tkr'vea Park tAxt ; 9pWial Sign Permit 81-8 16882eEa Lam Date 2UG + Jamury 19, 1902 WN) 16882 gton Eastlake Los l�llysla/1 C RI I + ttuntir,grtzm t3each, t ►1if. 90067 92647 Baktrice Hmftman PA sidrin 331 IJj,4, l n ! 16921 iAkeftmt CLMLO 16911 Eastlake Large � � Amtingtcn Borth, Calif H urtirgWn beach, Calif 93661. 91647 92547 _ Aeii�ient 7851 5oarthtake Drive Faimident Asxident ; "*Ino s Bmwh, Calif 16922 Lak ftnt Ci=le 79.11 WcxxAl+ake Drive I Hmtin9un 9uctto Ca i Hur;tirytcn beach, Calif + 92647 92647 - ----- __ _ __ ___ ____ ___ t: rNsiden 16%2 WwboA Law i 7 aka Drive16�952�Iti11 Larw Huntiesgtcen bench, Cal i f + mmt3r�� 8�, all 1rsti tl r 4b-In Bau%h, Calif 92647 1 i 92647 92647 ----------------- -- - - -- Perid nt Pam Jdent Adidant 16951 KU44ind Lane , 7881 Wnr4iake Driwi 16891 Weeb.*),' Laren H►ntiniiian OmKt4 Calif + tbantingtan 8aach, Calif Winti,rjton Ranch, Calif 92i47 ; 92647 92647 ------------ ----- _ _ ---- -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - •- - - - - - - - -- 16 i+feertmad Zane 7872 N rthlaks Drive Resident 11 Narthlake Drive HunUmbon DONclI, calif ' HuR, tiryytsrn Beenh, Wit .` tlrntiMtzm Peach, Calif 92647 + 92647 i 92647 ------------------ ----- + - -------- ---- --- --- --- . - . . _ __- --- -- ---- Raddent . iirmtidtnt 16932 Westwood Inge , 7892 Northlaka Drive 16921 Eastlako Ldne !mt�t�t�ctt beech, Calif � Huntirgton Lech, Calif , Jk7tJ g= Beach, Calif 92647 92647 Bedident "ident Aeai�,t 16912 Wwbex i Lane + 791,,, Rulhlake Drive 7032 WacdLike Drive IhmtiMtOn Beach, Calif i lhmtir►ltan Beach, call f ; Ittmt.i--vjt vn Umch, Wit 92647 92647 , 92647 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ► - -- ----- --- - - , Ftaaident Resident 142-191-01 16d92 Wwbwocd Lw* 1 16892 Eastlake L4m Ilaxr?' E IWrCj"nn f x*LfVt On BOW41, Calif lMntirrjt m beach, Calif , 3J1 Litr3o Averxar 92647 92647 + WILL. Calif i I- 92661 -----------------------'-- -- -- ---- - --- - - --------i ---------- ---------- ' i REQUE6 i" FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date March 22, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: dministrat '! Charles W. Thompson, City A o Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director of Development Services Subject: APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPecIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 81-b Statement of Inue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Souvoe,Alternativo Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 81.-8, a request to continue the use of an existing sign for subdivision directional purposes. a,F, PQmmPNnAT,QU: The Planning Commission and the Planning staff recommend that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 81-8. It is also recommended that the City Council adopt the findings as imposed by the Planning Commission on February 17, 1982. pA P-E L=: Martin Communications, Inc. 1888 Century Park East Suite 200 Los Angeles, California 90067 gp r�T A.NT: Same as above Lo CATION: West: side of Beach Boulevard approximately 75 feet south of Damask Drive. LtEOUEST: To permit the continuation of a subdivision directional sign 10' X 20' in size; 18 feet overall in height. Planning Commission n Action on February 17, 1982: � On motion by Porter and second by Winchell Special Sign Permit No. 81-8 was denied with the following findings, by the following vote: EINDINGS FOR DENIU, SSP 1. The granting of a special sign permit to allow the continued I PIO{fat I I 71 SSP 81-8 March 22, 1982 Page 2 use of a nonconforming sign would constitute the granting of a special privilege based on non-compliance witli sign area, size, and locational criteria for subdivision directional signs. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exceptional or extra- ordinary circumstances that do nLt apply generally to proper- ties allowing subdivision directional signs. 3. The proposed use of this sign does obstruct pedestrian and vehicular vision to adj4cent commercial property, and, there- fore, is detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such sign. 4. The applicant has not sufficiently demonstrated that strict compliance with the Ordinance Code will result in a substantial hardship. AYES: Mahaffey, Paone, Porter, Schumacher, Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister, Kenefick ABSTAIN: None DISCUssrSN: The sign structure is existing and is located on property adjacent to a flood control channel, 75 feet south of Damask Drive. Siting dimensions as indicated on the plot plan reveal that the sign structure is located 60 feet from the west side of Beach Boulevard, 15 feet from the south property line, and 35 feet from the north property line. The sign is 18 feet in height and 200 square feet In area 1101 X 2011 . The proposed use for this existing sign structure is to direct people to a land development. This particu- lar type of sign is classified as a subdivision directional sign and is subjected to size and locational criteria. The sign no longer conforms to current criteria. The previous sign code regulated the construction of this sign at a maximum sign area of 200 square feet; existing sign dimensions and height also were permitted, Building Division records indi- cate an expiration date of July, 1972 for a subdivision directional sign at this location and a second permit with an expiration date of March, 1974. Staff has been unable to locate any approvals to extend the use of this sign structure. During late 1977, the Land Use Division initiated investigations and inspections to insure the removal of the expired permitted subdivision directional signs throughout the Cityy. On October 13, 1977, in response to a notice of violation, 3M National Adver- tising Company communicated to the land use technician that they were forfeiting the bond to guarantee removal and to have the City arrange for removal of this structure. On that same day, a letter 1 i r SSP 81-8 ` March 22, 1982 Page 3 was received from the branch manager of the 3M National Advertis- ing Company and informed the land use technician that he made arrangements for sign removal. Work orders for removal of the subject sign were received October 17, 1977. 'three years later, a complaint was received from an adjacent busi- ness owner contending the sign had not been removed and was a visual obstruction to his business. An inspection followed and letters of violation were sent to the current owner of the sign. Pacific Outdoor Advertising Company responded t,. it their attorney would contact the City. Following the absence ,t compliance or communication from the sign company' s attorney, a request for prosecution was submitted to the City Attorney's office on Janu- ary 15, 1981. During the fall of 1981, an application for a zoning adjustment was received and returned with the proper Special Sign Permit ap- plication necessary for processing. An accompanying letter identi- fied the criteria deficiencies for the continued use as a subdi- vision directional sign. Briefly, the sign was found to be cur- rently nonconforming with the present sign code because: 1. The sign is located less than 200 feet from any developed property. 2. The sign is located closer than 20 feet from an interior t property line. 3. The sign dimensions and area exceed the allowed 10 feet by 10 feet and 100 square feet. 4. No provisions exist to extend a subdivision directional sign found to be nonconforming unless the Planning Commission grants a special sign permit . Attached is a copy of the applicant's justification to allow the continued use of this sign. Staff analysis reveals insufficient exposure for the south side of the sign to northbound Beach Houle- yard traffic. Southbound traffic has a visual obstruction to the adjacent commercial facility due to the proximity of the sign to the side property line. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land that warrant the granting of a special sign permit. Approval of such a permit may constitute a special privilege to the applicant based on the current sign code criteria and may set a future precedent for other subdivision directional signs or signs used for other advertising purposes within the City. FUNDING Q RCE: Not applicable. SSP 81-8 March 22, 1982 Page 4 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1. Reverse the Planning Commission' s action and approve Special. Sign Permit No. 81-8 with the following conditions: a. A building permit shall be obtained and shall expire one year from the date of issuance. b. A renewal of the building permit for this subdivision directional sign may be granted for a period of time not to exceed one year if units still exist for sale. c. The applicant shall post a cash bond of three hundred dollars ($300) with the City for the purpose of idemni- fying the City for any and all costs incurred in the re- moval of such sign. d. This subdivision directional sign shall be removed by the applicant within 15 days after expiration of said building permit or the required cash bond shall be deemed forfeited, }SU220RTTNG TNPORMATTQ : 1. Letter from appellant/applicant received and dated March 1, 1982. 2. Area Map 3. Site Plan and sign elevation 4. Staff report dated February 17, 1982 5. Applicant's ,justification 6. Correspondence JWP:SP:jlm I 6 1 MG MARTIN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. x n February 24, 1982 r Huntington Beach City Hall ^' •'' P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: City Clerk 1 RE: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 81--8 City Clerk: Martin Communications, Inc. wishes to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission. on February 17, 1982 concerning special sign Permit No. 81--8. The said sign is presently being used as a subdivision directional sign, as per the signal permit. The discontinuance of this sign shall create a tremendous burden on the Point Surfside Development, as per the attached letter from the Curtis Development Company, due to sagging sales of a substantial Huntington Beach condominium project. The project owner is retired and appreciates the additional income from the property, as she would rather not develop this property at this time. A development would block the neighboring property far more than is contended of our sign by the restaurant owner. The sign is set back from the street 60 feet and partially obstructs the side of the restaurant. There are no identification signs on the side of the building, as the restaurant owner has an identification sign fronting the street. Martin Communications, Inc. purchased the sign a little over a year ago, paying three years income for the location. Martin Communications subsequently upgraded the structure by painting the base. Martin communications would like to avoid a loss of over half the investment for this location. 1 888 Century Park East i Suite 200 / Los Angeles, California 90067 / 213 - 557-3777 r• � GOON Huntington Beach City Hall February 24, 1982 Page 2 Martin Communications, Inc. realizes them is a noncompliance concerning the size of this direct;oval sign and plead with the City Council to use a traditional grandfather clause approach in deciding the appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, _.�;Ile-,%t'� N. Thomas B. Martin President TBM/sg Enclosure i i t O 0 3 Q DAMASK DR. C4 C f ` 1 FLOB f-UTROL CHANNEL Tit 514m C i 0 200' 400' rn tl I FFFFF WARNER -4- } ` s p 13-� f HUNTWGTO'N TEACH PLANNING DIVISION i r i DAMA5 4 Ia r FLOOO Co#JTP"OL' aCa -a -- - � • � fit! ��1 .� i�•�wj ----ten-� J � i 11 � f o w�nev S a 0 it 2d 1' plirk elk, . L Goa .4,ige �e44 foo6 7 t[ ' 3 9 . . .� . ;, i ` � � ` .. � ' i ���� f -�-�. � � _ � � ' .mot: i .� ✓'r�' ..J. f ;y. � �, * � •, � . . } i a � � 1 . r �. ti. . . �, ;. r _ � � __ ,� i I I' I i i I J Fiu TINGTON BEACH DCv"cLOPMENT SERVICES ` BAN I I I PW r 1 , huntington beach develop^ services department ` STAf f EpORom. ► TO: Planning Commii-0 on FROM: Development Services DATE: February 17, 1982 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 81-8 APPLICANT: Martin Co►iununications, Inc. DATE ACCEPTED: 1888 Century Park East January 18, 1982 Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90067 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: R�ST: To permit the continuation of March 19, 1982 a subdivisional directional ZONE: C4 sj.gn 101 X 20' in size; ` 18 feet overall in height. GENERAL PLAN: LOCATION: Sub,)Lct property is located - on the west side of ©each General Commercial Boulevard approximately EXISTING USE: f 75 feet south of Damask Drive. Vacant -- existing sign ACREAGE: . 17 acre (7, 405 sq. ft. ) 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign } Permit No. 81-8 based on the findings as outlined in Section 7.0. + 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit No. 81-8 is a request to continue the use of an existing sign for subdivision directional purposes. 3-0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES: In accordance with Section 9760.44 of the Ordinance Code, the Commis- nip �-Fes•:aa 1 . f i .. f+' SSP 81--8 February 17, 1982 Page 2 sion may grant a special sign permit providing for relief from the strict application of the provisicc.s of the Ordinance Code subject to , a finding that the following conditions exist: a. Strict compliance with the sign code will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant, and { b. The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area, and C. The proposed sign will. not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such signs, and f d. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian and vehicular traffic vision. i 4.0 ENVJRONIJ,EhTA STATUS: On;premise signs are categorically exempt from CEQA requirements (Section 15111, Class 11, 5.0 SU tI2OUNDING GENERAL PLAN ?.ONINC AND LAND USES: i Subject Pro ert :- GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: C4, Highway Commercial LAND USE: Vacant North of Sub ect Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: CeneralFcommercial ZONING: Commercial/Flood D. Control Channel. LAND USE: East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: C4 LAND USE: Commercial South of Subject Property_: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: C4 LAND USE: Commercial West of Subje t rogerty: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONING: R2 LAND USE: Future condominium project SSP 81-8 i February 17, 1-982 Page 3 ++i —Q ANAI,Y iIS: The sign structure is existing and is located on property adjacent to 'I a flood control channel, 75 feet south of Damask Drive, Siting dimen- sions as indicated on the plot plan raveal that the sign structure is i located 60 feet from the west side of Beach Boulevard, 15 feel: from the: soul., property 'line, and 35 feet from the north property lies. The sign is 18 feet in height and 20C square feet in area (10' X 201 ) . The proposed use for this existing sign structure is to direct people to a land development. This particular type of sign is classified �.is { a subdivision directional sign and is subjected to size and locational 1 criteria. rho sign no longer conforms to current criteria. Ti,e previous sign code regulated the construction of this sign at a maximum sign area of 200 square feet; existing sign dimensions and height also were permitted. Building Division records indicate an ex- piration date of July, 1972 for a subdivision directional sign at this location and a second permit with an expiration date of March, 1974 . Staff has been unable to locate any approvals to extend the use of this sign structure. During late 1977, the Land Use Division initiated investigations and inspections to insure the removal of the expired permitted subdivision directional signs throughout the City. On October 13, 1977, in response to a notice of violation, 3M National Advertising Company communicated to the land use technician that thiy wore forfeiting the bond to guaran- tee: removal and to have the City arrange for r.e:noval of this structure. On that same day, a letter was received from the branch manager of the 3M National Advertising Company and informed the land use technician that he had trade arrancie.ments for sign removal. Pork orders for re- 111oval of the subject sign ware received October 17, 1977 . Three years later a complaint was received from an adjacent business owner contending the sign had not been removed and was a visual obstruc- tion to his business. An inspection followed and letters of violation were sent to the current owner of the sign. pacific Outdoor Advertising Company responded that their attorney would contact the City. Following the absence of compliance or communication from the sign company' s at- torney, a request for prosecution was submitted to the City Attorney's office on January 15, 1981 . I:uri.ng the fall of 1981, an application for a zoning adjustment was re- ceived and returned with the proper Special 04g n permit application necessary for processing. An accompanying letter identified the cri- teria deficiencies for the continued use as a subdivision directional sign. Briefly, the sign was found to be currently nonconforming with the present sign code because: 1 . The sign located Less than 200 feet from any developed property. 2. The sign is located closer than 20 feet from an interior property lire, i ' SSp' 81-8 February 17, 1982 Page 4 3. The sign dimensions and area exceed the allowed 10 feet by 10 feet and 100 square feet. A . No provisions exist to extend a subdivision directional sign found to be nonconforming unless the Planning Coiimil Sion grants a special sign permit. Attached is a copy of the applicant' s justification to allow the con- tinued use of this sign. Staff analysis reveals insufficient exposure for the south side of the sign to northbound Beach Boulevard traffic. Southbound traffic has a visual obstruction to the adjacent commercial Facility due to the proximity of the sign to the side property line. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land that warrant the granting of a special sign per- mit. Approval of such a permit may constitute a special privilege to the applicant based on the current sign code criteria and may set a future precedent for other subdivision directional signs or signs used for other advertising purposes within the City. 1,,0 RECONJhIF,NpATIUN: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 81-13 based on the following findings: FTN 7 (;S FOR, DENIAL: 1 . The granting of a special sign permit to allow the continued use of a nonconforming sign would constitute the granting of a special privilege based on non-compliance with sign area, size, and loca- tional criteria for subdivision directional signs. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to properties allowing vubdivision directional signs. 3. The proposed use of this ; I.gn does obstruct pedestrian and ve- hicular vision to adjacej,- commercial property, and therefore, is detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such sign. 4. The applicant has not r,,fficiently demonstrated that strict com- pliance with the Ordi%r-'-=e Code will result in a substantial hardship. ATTA IIMENTS: 1. Area Map 2. Site Plan 3. Elevations 4. Applicant' s justification Spy lm �r ATTACHMENT f JUSTIF:CATION 1. Will strict compliance with the sign ordinance result in a substantial economic hardship? Tract developer needs sin to sell units durinS times of 5oneral economic ardsh Q. Property owner is retired and appreciates the additional income. Sign- com2at:y would like to recover costs_ involve with upgrading board-painting copy. 2. Does the proposed or existing sign adversely affect other signs in the area? Sign has no affect on other signs as sign is setback considerably from the street and not in direct visibility line from the street with any other sign 3. Will the proposed or existing sign be detrimental to the surrounding properties? No adverse affect as sign is centered in a vacant property, flood control directly to the nort and trees on property to the south. r 1. Will the proposed or existing sign obstruct pedestrian or veh.4.cular traffic vision? No obstruction to pedestrian or vehicular traffic, as se-M-a-c-k---o-ET the street at least '6'U feet. E E:UILUING pFPT. I ;;�I :Robert F Curtis DeveloPme t C- r'- ` aFaC�l February 8, 1982 City of Huntington Beach AIA Planning Department V. 0, f3ox 2000 Main Street Nur,►• ` 0Ca,• Huntington Beach, California Re: Curtis Huntington Beach Company - Pointe Surfside Gentlemen/women: On July 24, 1981, we signed a contract with Martin Communica- tions, Irc. (now Outdoor Advertising Expertise) for a two faced 10' X 20' billboard 575' north of Warner Avenue on Beach Boulevard. i On February 5, 1982, 1 was advised by Eric Cooney of Outdoor Advertising Expertise that the City of Huntington peach bond ; is up for that location and that the restaurant owners to one side of our sign will be appealing any renewal of same. He also advised me that the reason for them doing this is that our sign partially blocks one side of their building which is a blank wall with no lettering or identifying information. Please consider this letter our appeal to you to allow our sign to exist at that location. We feel that this location is essential to our condominium sales program as it directs both north and southbound beach Boulevard traffic towards our project on Warner Avenue. During the slow economic period being experienced by all developers in this area, a loss of a critical sign location such as this would have a negative impact which would be evidenced by a loss of traffic through j our project and resulting sales. Due to the heavy volume of billboards and signage of commercial users all along Beach Boulevard in thF� area, it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to acquire another billboard location that would be as effective for us as this one has proven to be. i t t • t i 1 l 4952'ftrrer Ave.,Suite 301 Hunt-- i9ton Beach.Co.92649 Business office(714)846.5510 or(213)592.2355 Canst:ruction offica(7,4)846.5559 I 1j 1 7 f Page 2 City of Huntington Beach February 8, 1982 We executed our contract in good faith and are extremely concerned by this turn of events. Please demonstrate your fair judgment in evaluating and determining your decision regarding this matter. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please i do not hesitate to contact me at this office. Sincerely, t � CURTIS HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY By: Robert F. Curtis Development Co. , Inc. Authorized Agent- By: R6bert rt s Presidrit { .ram _ _'__ __ _ -- •••.+,-- ___ r:-'i t C CITY OF HUNTING TON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I January 20, 1982 I I i Sam Gilio 16883 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach. CA 92647 ' The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held January 18. 1982 granted your appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 81-6. Please contact the Development Services Department for further informa- tion - 536-5271. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW.CB.cd cc: Jim Palin Development c i e pment Services Director u i i i y'/ ITolophonr.714.536•S2271 INTiIY. �- Superior Court CIT cctL OF7111; �Y�D 11Y Y o 19 ..... SrATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange ,.,.••r""r /'r C.r-j t 4ti tt CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHs CITY CLERK 1-11j2QE OCf UMM"ATION PUBLIC HEARING State of California t '';/;��al����•'� (;aunty of Orange )r". to Jeannie L. Thomas .rats rr�,,►��.t�R�rY�y� IWYw�tT+11 That l am and at all times herein mentioned was A r.tirrn of lltiwdM. jam""' the Vnited Stater,over the Age of twenty-one years,and that I M am not a party to,nor interested in the alarvr entitled matter; � r that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the 'Utso.MI!a3fM .� Huntington Beach Ind. Reviewbill a newspaper of general rirculatian,puhli.hnl in the City of Huntington Beach .►�e.rwtir...t �w.a" S County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the �"� a" Tlslis/twal rl flt�elaa.. thitemination of hrcal news and intelligence of a general charac• ;flr•. :^rr,�;a;!?p",�xr� {e,� ter,and which newspaper at a9 times herein mentioned had ,AN�� �' +�`! ► and slitl has a spa ride aulacn "Is lint a paying d antiipub, a�11y+�Ma�►� and which newspaper has lien e+trhti+thetl,printer!anti pub, lished at regular intervals in the acrid County of Orange fora period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the nls annesed is A printed ropy,has been published in the rt•gular UA and entire iruue of said newspaper,and not in any euplilrrnrnt rt thereof,on the following dates,la wit: ' t7gp {• _ l.y January T+ 1982 1 certify for declare)under fxnalty of perjury that the forrgo- ing L•tare and earrect. Dated at..P.4.r.de11..PY9.Y.9............ ............ California,this 9#h.. dAv of ..J. n 8j. . Signature } i ^ t OM NO cAf.013t10 Publish 1-7-82 NnTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 81-6 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 18th day of January , 1982 for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 81-6, a request to alter an existing free-standing sign by removing the existing sign and replacing the sign with a 35 sq. ft. interior illuminated free-standing sign. The proposed sign will be approximately 15 ft. high from the existing grade. The subject property is located on the west side � of Beach Blvd. , approximately 450 ft. north of the centerline of Warner Ave. in the C4 (Highway Commercial District). A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. , i i All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 { DATED 1-4-82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentwwh City Clerk W NOTICE, 1-0 CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ' ITEM '� fir' aArAdt T0: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE l! DATE: go/ FROM: PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE DAY OF1 ''� AP's era Attached AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) YES NO I Refer to �/ ' �el5r' t'� Planning Department - Extension for additional infcrmhtion. * If a 1 , please transmit exact wording to he required in the legal , LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beac , California, for the purpose of considering e0 .t,Wz449 CA s 7-4 vs d,n 07 S� /� !�c� !'..e 1"o v:r + dq L LW PA I A 4�L W7 vvw� ju4tk fql�' y � Gorr�hurcraL I�t�rrl�7� Said hearing will be held at the hour of :Z '. 3 b P.M. , on am in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Cente , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed 5 `�p ,.�.�„�� , T� Alto AW Further information may obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this day of CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By Sae Gi1lo 142--191-18 1680 beach 91vd &t*cial Sign P mit 81-6 Aldus' if Ita)etman M.Rtt•ritywn !beech, Calif rbv. 2U, 1981 VH) :021 Alisv Ave�xrf 92647 Cal t4 Mecca, Calif 92627 107-•691-2.2 142-191-19 oam Id P. Jones jow G Amtaipw ibttnld R Hix 17931 hewn Blvd 1432 w � Huart 8adcit, Calif BayAvarwrr� 17551 Bates Circle amdai NOWP rt B°`Xt' Cal�.f tit�ont• nytun Lke�ach, (�f 92"3 92649 107-100-58 142-191-01 142-191-21 ! i Allan P Lays Harry E Mcksan -9?wtrw Itmesbnent oDrp + 1bd91 A Street 331 Lirdo Avenn C/o rA=IOW &=enters Il►a't 4ngtcn beach, cif Bslboa►, Cal 17320 fiaaeh Dlvti 92647 92661 Hmt.imton i*dch, C.a1.l.f 92647 107-100-67 142-191-08 152-191-27 JAW R Stw.ex't Daeald P Jo-KIN k bunktas P.O. Wx 248 Paul Janes P"Ity 6811 soa is Bay La SAn Adrwa, Calif 17931 Death Blvd IhMiryton Duacne tt, C" 95249 Iluntirtgtw a atah, Calif 92647 92648 107-100-72 142-191-12 142-191-33 City of Huntington Beach Madik 107-100•-72 142-191-12 142-191-35 SomMity I%Afic Bdu* Ntl TR J. B. xini Jr L,rxell ti Ararbrry Tax Div P05-2-00%7-0 1927 Turaita Lane 17082 C.roantrou Latta P.U. box 60b02 Tum J rmx ft4jort Bearit, Calif JIMt:.irsltvn UeWh, Calif LOU AniaLwal Calif 90069 92660 92649 107-1Q0-•75 142-191-14 142-191.-37 R•dwd VULL4 TR 5tepttn Du 0M William T O'Brien Jr 19192 k Utaita AvenA 52 Wal St Getsa4e Ad R & H Allen Inc orartp, Cali Nao ,urt Box-h, Wif 240 Nice Lam- 1113 92669 92660 ::er+Extt Ix>ach. Calif 92b63 L07-100-75 142--1.il-16 142-4d1-11 Luutia M Dreier iitm= b Et,{p Jr 'T4t Aaf 1,►*.stt:r Irutd dr llnerirGu Irt:.t1 1001 f. srxedt e.U. tfwc 715 6770 Uxku LlIu- wr Drive j Itantinit,an Lx wch, r:alif balbw, (;&lif OrlAnLk.), t'lutiu.t 9tb47, 92bb1 31dU9 107-100-77 142-191017 'tltelad L Ackre or. William T O'Brian Jr ab9ll A Strut 30J A1t:4 Lane sluntArxitun ixm2i, CAA if Cx;tA Hera, Calif y2(,47 92627 l Y i CITY COUNCIL ACTION RI�QIJ�S � FOR t� . Date January 18, 1962 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Adr�linistratatAll ( i Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services Subject: APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF PECIAL SIGN ; PERMIT NO. 81-6 Statement of Issue, R000mmendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Altemative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 81-6, a request to permit the alteration of an existing freestanding wood sign to an internally illuminated electrical sign. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and the Planning staff recommend that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission denial of Special Sign Permit No. 81-6. It is also recommended that the City Council adopt the findings as imposed by the Planning Commission on December 15, 1.981. ANALYSIS: ` APPELLANT: Sam Gilio 16883 Beach Boulevard Huntington Beach, CA 92647 APPLICANT: Same as above LOCATION: West side of Beach Boulevard; approximately 400 feet north of Warner Avenue (16883 Beach Boulevard) . REQUEST: To permit the alteration of an existing freestanding wood sign by removing the existing sign and replacing the sign with an internally illuminated sign with a maximum height of 15 feet and a total area of 35 square feet. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON DECEMBER 15, 1981: ON MOTION BY BAN'IISTER AND SECOND BY KENEFICK SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 81-6 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 81-6: P10 A/R• S 1 SSP 81-6 Jan. 18, 1982 Page 2 1. The granting of a special sign permit for the restaurant will constitute the granting of a special privilege because the restaurant currently has two wall signs and a freestanding sign identifying the restaurant. 2. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not generally apply to other businesses within the center or surrounding commercial properties. The restaurant presently has more signing than would be allowed under the present sign code. 3. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the Ordinance Code will result in a substantial hardship. AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Porter, Paone, Winchell. NOES: Mahaffey ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAIN: None DISCUSSION: There are presently two freestanding signs located on the subject property. Both signs are located at right angles to Beach Boule- vard. The sign located at the south end of the property identifies the businesses within the commercial center. This sign is approxi- mately 15 foot high and 180 square feet in area. The sign located at the north end of the subject property identifies the applicant ' s business, a restaurant. 'rhis sign is approximately 13' 6" high and 35 square feet in area. The two freestanding signs were constructed under the pravious sign code regulations. The code allowed one freestanding sign for each individual building. The current sign code allows the subject property one freestanding sign for the purpose of identifying the canter and each separate business. If the special sign permit Is approved by the Council, the appli- cant intends to remove the existing freestanding restaurant sign and replace the sign with a similar freestanding sign. The proposed sign would be approximately 15 feet high and 35 square feet in sign area. The sign would be internally illuminated and identify � the applicant' s restaurant. The name of the restaurant is being changed from "Gilio Italian Restaurant" to "Ristorante Gilio". The applicant feels that replacing the existing sign with a new freestanding sign will benefit both the City and the applicant's business. (Sec attached letter from applicant.) Staff analysis indicates there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, building or premises that warrant approval of a special sign permit for this ?WON I SSP 81-6 Jan. 18, 1982 Page 3 property. The applicant's business currently is identified by wall signs located on the east sidn of the restaurant (this sign faces Beach Boulevard) and the north side of the restaurant (this sign faces traffic traveling south on Beach Boulevard) . The re- staurant is also identified by an existing freestanding sign that can be seen by traffic traveling both north and south on Beach Boulevard. This existing sign is considered to be nonconforming by the current code requirements, but is permitted to remain on the site until such time as the sign is changed or structurally altered in any manner. Staff analysis indicates that approval of Special Sian Permit No. 81.-6 may constitute a special privilege to the applicant based on current sign code requirements and may set a future precedent for other commercial businesses within the City. Article -76, Sia:l Cade of the Huntington beach Ordinance Code prohibits more than one freestanding sign per site, per street frontage within the commercial zoning districts. The intent of this code section is to allow one freestanding sign, sufficient in sire to identify the entire center and the businesses within the center. The Commission and staff feel that approval of a freestanding sign idetitifying "one" business constitutes a special privilege for the applicant, and that no appreciable hardship has been demonstrated to warrant approval of this application. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1. Reverse the Planning Commission's action and approve Special Sign Permit No. 81-6 as requested by the applicant. 2. Consider allowing the installation of a low profile monument sign located within the existing landscaped planter. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Letter from applicant received and dated December 28, 1981 2. Area Map 3. Site plan and sign elevation 4. Staff report dated December 15, 1981 X.IP:SMS:j lm pp yZ2 All ? CIY CLE K Beach �?vd. CITY of �:.:Ci:, ! IIU)ITINCTON PVCII.C„tlF. q2, 1*7 .� All 6 ' DEC �� �� � I3t:cc:-?1;er 7, lc r31 City Cou-nnil Thc• J:uff en .;w.,'c:;;�.t?'� �ii<' f::ct th:.t: the -r.nt;in,, of .:,ic ciG.l r:i _n _,•:.i:_,it: con-t ltut cc1�:l I do not ;ult:r u:rc:er::t .�:c? of t.iu,t )eci..l privilcu e t;hc:y re z c°ferni►z� to. i,vt:rl' LusinE:ss in t:'ic center iiztve 0.11 sign;, 11d c. city �161e s1611, trL.icil I not included on. 11 :;i; rr:., rtci c, pole -1-;r1. I c= not rci.uc,wtin;: Q'1',C1,G,>Ion f or F: nc:ir s!Ln. 1 ii.av:: ni ,n i•.-bicii is fnded, vile 1r00d i:, all n'-lit, c111cpldated looking. I have chnns- ed tiie nr1� e of the restr�iuc-trt fro.;i CAlio Italian i?ectnt.2zrtt to Rictoxr.iitc Gilio, the_•efore, r.?ci very ninply by rrr.:titinC ne the pornisvion of caiuigin(-, the t;,o f'-.:ce.; of tlic pr.'esent si;r► =d ro- placing it �•rith a net, r.nd modern sit;-n would he beneficial to me I and to the envirow.ientvi loon of Beach Boulev; rd. The Staff end the Con.,tlosion have ac-dal t:::it I have not presented subst vuntial cvide:icc for hards.11p. If a b .G.Inens of ray si -.o is sr.nrlficit:G to spend J0,000.00, w1ilen Is fi. stress to my income, for all ncu, s t inn, i:n_s to :re :•. rc_..on, (n tr•cst;) . The only way I cvn Give proof' of hr.cfdshtp is , bringirtL-; nay books Gown and lcttin.E you thern. To ::iy bi;niness it IT., vely importr:nt I to hrve _proper si:,ns, fur ?)roper Identification :_nd proper zcdvci'tisemc►it. Ott t:r-e mec tin:_ oi' D(see::ibQr 15th, rr th the P1win- inO COM."As:,1011, I s gold ;iir::t duce to the 1977 a9 �,m Code, any v IE:,ns not nr:nforci1n:_ to the Codc after 5 yet.x.,, h::ve to be removed. ! tjll4 Lilco, t he sl.yo tilat I can kee) t i• u sign lon,, I am the ot,ner, ::nd I c:,Dr:ct to ur,: L':e oimer f:?w Ion,- time tri c,i,e, 1 Thcrefore, I do not comprehend Ic i;.ron;; in changing the prenent c"_7ded, nirlit , dilapid•:ted sign to r: net•r one. This would � betrofit m;; buCincos ?ld ti?E: errvf.ron-t;ntal 100'.t of Bench Bottlevc:rd. Sincerely, Sam Gillo Riatorrnte �ilio 168L'� :.e�.ch Blvd. f Htintin+-ton Buz,1ch, C:s. 92647 s City kl.r-nnin:• (;Oo-imittee November 2�, 19E11 Huntington Beach, CZ'. The Y�f;o1ll�ot�;inz is/�any�;�xplanation for requevtin,; permAssi.oil � to z-e:place Ta3 lecent slr,n. i!- The _present sign lu rcctnnguiar 10t - 3061', 035 sq. ft. made of send blasted too-d, painted raid co::L)1eto1,: faded � end splitting. 2. It rendn "GILIO IT,%LAL'.1 ' ", the new ni:rse is "RISTOR-UNT GUM' 3. It is an extesrlor illumin�-ted uIgn. Reasons 1 Pnd 2 could be fixed by repl.arin , the 2 panela with now ones thrA read historr:nte Gillo. This Mould be nn expenditure nigher than the 7roposed net; siLm-. The sign � would otill be the some ugly rectnngulor, non appealing look that is not consistent with the environmental look of Huntington Bench vnd pnrticulerly Beach Blvd. Thera is very pcor visual exposure rued identification for a business located on n fast trrvelled. boulevoxd such ra Bej.ch Blvdo Reason 3 18 the most important one, uecauae of exterior illumi.nat,on this sign is virtually useless at night. people trnvelllng on Beach Blvd* do not notice the sign fuid others who are recoruiended and looking for ray restaurrnt have a hard time to find It. I dear the vamo compIrAnt all the time. "We hcd the h rdo-vt time to find this reatr.:uru nt", con3t— vuently, I:1y c &,aces of acquiring new custoners through the I effectiveness of this present s+t'n are very,vezy, poor. I pay high rent to be at this locction, the benefits that I should receive for identific,-tion'M-kpos-re bocause of the j high traffic on :.etch Blvd. is loot with my e:2went sign. Also, a cheap ulgn D; a bnd xcf l.eetion on rsi establ.ichment fsnd nn efficient sign is the best advertisement. This con- dition definitely Bute r burden trid he.rdship on my business, j i { -2_ i Thy: nee proposed r;!En is or the sa:.:e square footing as the old. one, bttt definitely is a batter loo:cint; sigh, ! ` • IS rn Improvement to tee surrotmdinc environment, is a :such .,ore: efficient sign for �d.verti ninE my re;tnur,.nt. has 1.etter visual. Mc..tific-tion, dcytime, rLr.d of courue at night, &r being interntLI1y il.l t ainr.ted it ;rill give me all the benefits that, I shoulcl receive from B sirn on the highly and fpDt travelled Bet,ch E31vd. { I respectfully plead t:'is committee to save me the ` chance to change ttie si, i for Lf fiulent unee. Sincarel�Ct. i S.-in GIIio kk� f. I i i E f -V- tu �M� vrMl RI IIR Ci4 C4i 3 RI RI t~ _� ....y�. ► Rl ql w :RI Ri RI , " , _ 1 RI ., —r; t s. RI Rl FIN RI RI ��� QI - y � •it t Rl I�) R� a � C4 °t}:j RI ,Y.Ai (1S�RI ��Al ;i Rl ';�!i l• P C4_ wwRi t CF- = 1+ + R2is �i I j Cs, y: E .NI<r -RS ' j . f G . •(-F WARI.E- �-aVE — r r-- . t RI RI � ,. C ;s � FR �C -��._ a� .F RY f r RZ .+� • j S . S 1 1 3t •� 1fV N "R2� j�' RISri t�Ii �` RI Rl RI RI RI .wa R2 . ... RI 4l R2" rRilk, Rl :�; �� f �R3 M 1 M 1 �; �= R I 6c Rl-ca---l-I it 1 I t Mt7ViU.GTOv Of hCH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION S . - 4 CA m C � Q 1T�1 r'A R K, Mr-r ITI TH Cl �f � � I III �- / • 00 P--r tep t '-Ifs 41. t IT- �...��3 ----lid'` � � '� � • •F�-'� /��s� �.c vim. `Y � l�, .._ . ...., - sT 2n It ��r,��,fi. << wog s� S.' ,t, -3��j• : cA, L 'c i 6'�'l� T/a/ION IT.5 T/)vl?�/`/7 I 7+ P • ,�1 �. .. rl�y;..� ; '.YI.L:.li J,��" :� . '�I *%* i•1t, _ J. =M':'• . . i. INV,l.�l4!��J`+l; .�Ii. ,�t1f.+l::•S, s,.,•�jw- .�.+'•;!i i ..;,,3'�,d•I,:�t,'li:�: �!.' •'� ' , ••�.�`"�`i"e. ��I •����'C 3�;a+t..�.!„nor i'. ';',l».rr.�%P- '�:' '••�'� eis ' , `'eta"�'1 �.; ,r"� ':., - .•'"'�, � , — � „t • pia • GCGv 7 i�•t I i 1 SLAT ,-,.•, -.— �� •, 51 I`I o.j If i 1 a. ;+' � �27 •`�r;w�.:.i�::�}•�i}'•'�Z�r!Y '•'• •]�. � • t•. ,,.�:.:r r'4�;••'( - r:.:.•: .. .:,.•1,. :,,., ^•�.ta•.•,�. , .� tl�^1`�}1. • �t:i �;r.�' ..-1. ,' • '!� i .. .. _ .. � t auntington beach developK. services department s°rAff --REPORT- TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: December 15, 1981 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 81-6 � APPLICANT: Sant Gilio DATE ACCEPTED; 16883 Beach Blvd. December 2, 1981 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: ; REOUFST: To permit alteration of February 1, 1982 existing free standing ZONE: sign to electrical sign of same: dimension. C4, Highway Commercial District GENERAL PLAN: LOCATION: Subject property is located ►: on the west of Beach Blvd. , General Conunercial approximately 400 feet • north of Warner Avenue. EXISTING USE: t ACREAGE: 1.70 acres Restaurant and commercial shopping center 4 ' 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: The staff reconvnends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 81-6 based on the findings as outlined in Section 7.0 of this report. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit No. 81-6 is a request by the applicant~ to alter an existing freestanding sign by removing the existing good sign and replacing the sign with an internally illuminated sign with a maximum height of 15 feet and a total area of 35 square feet. A•FM•238 I SSP 81-6 December 15, 1981 {1 Page 2 f ti i 3.0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES: In accord---;ice with Section 9760.44 of the Ordinance Code, the Conunis- sion may grant a special sign permit providing for relief from the strict application of the provisions of the ordinance Code subject to a finding that the following conditions exist: a. Strict compliance with the sign code will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant, and b. The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area, and c. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such signs, and d. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian and vehicular traffic vision. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On-premise signs are categorically exempt from CEQA requirements (Section 15111, Class 1I, State EIR Guidelines) . 5.0 SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN, ZONING AND LAND USE: 6ubject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: C4, Highway Commercial District LAND USE: Comtt:ercial Shopping Center and Restaurant North_ of Subject Aronerty: I' GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: C4, Highway Commercial District LAND USE: Restaurant East of Subject Property: (across Beach Boulevard) GENERAL PLAN DEESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: C4, Highway Commercial District LAND USE: General Retail Uses South of Subject Pronerty: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: C4, Highway Commercial District LAND USE: General Retail Uses SSP 81--6 - December 15, 1981 Page 3 I M West of .Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONING: R2, Medium Density Residential LAND USE: Vacant 6.0 ANALYSIS: I There are presently two freestanding signs located on the subject pro- perty. Both signs are located at right angles to Beach Boulevard. !� The sign located at the south end of the property identifies the j businesses within the commercial center. This sign is approximately 15 foot high and 180 square feet in area. The sign located at the north end of the subject property identifies the applicant's business, a i restaurant. This sign is approximately 13 ' 6" high and 35 square feet in area. The two freestanding signs were constructed cinder the Previous sign code regulations. The code allowed orie freestanding sign for each individual building. The current sign code allows the subject pro- 1 perty one freestanding sign for the purpose of identifying the center ) and each separate business. 1 If the special sign permit is approved by the Commission, the applicant intends to remove the existing freestanding restaurant sign and replace the sign with a similar freestanding sign. The proposed sign would be � approximately 15 feet high and 35 square feet in sign area. The sign yrould be internally illuminated and identify the applicant' s restaurant. Tne name of the restaurant is being changed from "Gilio Italian Restau- rant" to "Ristorante Gilio". The applicant feels that replacing the existing sign with a new freestanding sign will benefit both the City and the applicant' s business. (See attached letter from applicant. ) Staff analysis indicates there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, building or pre- mises that warrant approval of a special sign permit for this property. The applicant's business currently is identified by wall signs located r on the east side of the restaurant (this sign faces Beach Boulevard) and the north side of the restaurant (this sign faces traffic traveling south on Beach Boulevard) . The restaurant is also identified by an existing freestanding sign that can be seen by traffic traveling both north and south on Beach Boulevard. This existing sign is considered to be nonconforming by the current code requirements, but is permitted to remain on the site until such time as the sign is changed or struc- turally altered in any manner. Staff analysis indicates that approval of Special Sign Permit No. 81-6 may constitute a special privilege to the applicant based on current $SP 81-6 December 15, 1981 Page 4 sign code requirements and may set a future precedent for other com- mercial businesses within the City. Article 976, Sign-Code of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code prohibits more than one freestanding sign per site, per street frontage within the commercial zoning districts. The intent of this code section is to allow one freestanding sign, sufficient in size to identify the entire center and the businesses within the center. The staff feels that approval of a freestanding sign identifying "one" business constitutes a special privilege for the applicant, and that no appreciable hardship has been demonstrated to warrant: approval of this application. 7,0 RECOMMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 81--6 based on the following findings: FINDINGS: 1. The granting of a special sign permit for the restaurant will con- stitute the granting of a special privilege because the restaurant currently has two gall signs and a freestanding sign identifying the restaurant. 2. Thera are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not generally apply to other businesses within the center or surrounding commercial properties. The restaurant presently has • more signing than would be allowed under the present sign code. 3. The applicant has nto demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance code will result in a substantial hardship. ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION: The staff would endorse a low-profile monument sign on the subject property in lieu of the 15 foot high, 35 square foot sign requested by the applicant. However, based on current sign code requirements, a low-profile monument sign would require approval of a special sign permit. ATTACHMENTS: 1, Area Map 2. Sign Elevation 3. Site Plan Letter from applicant dated Nove,nber28, 1981 SMS:jlm •f• # City of Huntington Beach i P.O. Box Ito CAI-IFONNIA US" (N vl(.N Uh I'fIF CITY CI.E:Ith. { November 17, 1981 G. M. Signs, Inc. 2228 Hollywood Way Burbank, CA. 91505 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held November 16, 1981 granted your appeal to the Planning Conmissions denial of Special Sign Permit 81-4 conditioned on a maximum of 25 ft. height. Please contact the Department of Developmental Se, vices for addi- tional information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk ARW:b t CC: Jim Palin, Director of Development Services Sid Wasserman, Beach Motors I II 1 i , i ................ ..,. -. ...i 1..-..•. ..,. . .... .ri' .n.N.l'"!'.. •.I:.j . ....^ca•:.iJjt•.i ldi ! lr THE � Superior Court STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange t~ CITY OF „HUNTINGTON BEACHs,. CITY C LER I( PROOF OF PUBLICATION ............... ...... ................................................ State of California County of Orange rt• Jeannie L.-Thomas........ .... , .......... .. ... . r ott. t' That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of the United Stales,over the age of twentycne years,and that 1 am not a party to,nor Interested in the above entitled matter;that I am the ;. is "gam �qr.e/ fprincipal clerk of the printer of thewrwdpe , awtway s�i►l�'tra y,K " .f Huntington Beach Ind. Review a a newspaper al general circulation,published in the City of • �Ofs e� Hu Ainglon..B.e.a.ch.. ... County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the dn• 1*11M,I"iY semination of local news and in 10"Mtelligence of a general character, iw as' � a �4 pwnst and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and stilly 0 eai. hasa bone fide subscription list of paying subscribers,and which �i.suawsr. ,w �- rM newspaper has been_staDllshed,printed and puDllshe+b it regular �� Gyes.of gar dlyllwt �,1��,,, Intervals In the said County of Orange for a period exce:dirg one t�asi4 e) g+�• .CLftwfir' year;that'he notice,of which the annexed Is a printed copy,hastot.;' s . f been published In the regular and entire Issue of said newspaper, OF 1 and not In cny supplement thereof,on the following dates.to wit: ' lL1CLYf ff ,., ................. . • I certify for declaw under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is i true and correct. IDatedat ............................ California.this..5.t.H..day of..NO V.r...19..81 .. Signature i I , i I � �l REQUES FOR CITE' COUNCI -A STION Date November 16, 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council 6/X/4/- Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator 1 � Prepared by: James If. Palin, Director of Development Services wt, s Subjed. APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENTAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 81-4 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BEACH BOULEVARD 200 FEET NORTH OF SLATER AVENUE Stav ment of Issue, Recommendatinn,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,attachments: i STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commission denial of Special Sign Permit No. 81-•4, a request to remove an existing 8 'X17 ' pylon sign, 25 feet high and install a 4161IX22' metal and plexiglas pylon sign on steel structure, 34 f+::et high. I RECOMMENDATION• The Planning Commission anc? Planning staff recommend that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 81-4. It is also recommending that the City Council adopt the findings as imposed by the Planning :ommission on October 20, 1981 . ANALYSIS: Apnellant. G. M. Signs, Incorporated 2228 Hollywood Way Burbank, Calif. 91505 Applicant: Same as above. Location: West side of Beach Boulevard, 200 feet north of Slater Avenue. Request: To remove existing 8'X17' pylon sign, 25 feet high and install a 4161IX22 ' metal and plexiglas sign on a steel structure, 35 feet high. Planning Commission Action: Mahaffey made a notion to approve Special Sign Permit No. 81-4 because it is an improvement over the existing sign. This motion, however, failed for lack of a second. PIG IMI i F` Special Sign Permit 8i.-4 November 16, 1981 Page 2 ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY KENEFICK SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 81-4 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: F.;_:NDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance code will result in a substantial economic hardship. Other options are available to the applicant, in- cluding wall signing on the sales office or reducing the square footage of the Oldsmobile pole sign to accommodate Mazda. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exceptional or extra- ordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the properties in the same zoning classi.ficr.tions as demonstrated by othtr commercial uses within the general area. 3. The granting or this request will constitute a special privilege because the applicant has several options available that fall within the scope of the ordinance code as outlined below: a. A reduction in the sign area of the existing Oldsmobile pole sign in order to accommodate advertising for the Mazda dealership; b. The additional rf a wall sign on the sales office; or c. Construction of two SO square foot, low-profile monument signs, one to replace the existing non-conforming Olds- mobile sign and the second to advertise for the Mazda dealership (this option would require approval of a special sign permit by the Planning Commission) . AYES: Bannister, Kenefi,.k, Paone, Porter, Schumacher j NOES: Mahaffey ABSENT: Winchell ABSTAIN: Nora A motion was made by Bannister and seconded by Mahaffey to re- consider the above application for a special sign permit, allow- ing a modification of the original request by lowering the proposed sign to 25 feet in height. This motion failed to carry by the following vote: AYES: Bannister, Mahaffey NOES: Kerefli:k, Paone. Porter, Schumacher ABSENT: Winchell ABSTAIN: None . . .. Special. Sign permit 81-4 November 16, 1981 Page 3 DISCUSSION• The proposed pole sign would be locatcd on the site of an existing Mazda/Oldsmobile dealership with a street `.rontage of 380 feet. The dealerships currently have two non-conforming freestanding pole signs, one £or Mazda and one for Oldsmobile automobile sales. The proposed sijn would replace the existing non-conforming Mazda pole sign with a new non-conforming pole sigi, for the purpose of illustrating a new sign copy. All Mazda dealerships are changing their corporate logo, thus necessitating new signage. The proposed sign would exceed. the following provisions of the sign code: 1. Sect.-.an 9760.7 establishes a maximum sign height of 20 feet for pole signs which are set back 0-12 feet from It-he ultimate right-.of-way. The proposed sign would be set bac% 11 feet from the ultimate right--of-way with a height of 34 feet. 2. Section 9760.7 requires that only "one freestanding sign per street frontage shall be permitted . . . " The proposed sign would perpetuate the non-conformity of two pole signs per street frontage. Even though s'-aff concurs that the findings relating to detriment of property, adverse effect on other signs in the area, and the possible obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision can be met by the applicant, there are no indications that a substantial economic hardship exists. Staff analysis indicates that there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appli- cable to the land, buildings, or premises to prevent the site from being advertised as outlined in Section 9760.7 of the ordinance code. Staff recommends than the applicant consider one of the following options: 1) A reduction in the sign area of the existing Olds- mobile pole sign in order to accommodate advertising for the Mazda dealership; 2) The addition of a wall sign on the sales office; or 3) Construction of two 50 square foot, low-profile monument signs, one to replace the existing non-conforming Oldsmobile sign and the second to advertise for the Mazda dealership (this option would require approval of a special sign permit by the Planning Commission) . FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. the applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance code will result in a substantial economic hard- ship. Other options are available to the applicant, including wall signing on the sales office or reducinc. `_he square footage of the Oldsmobile pole sign to accommodate . :azda. lI - - __-- �1 Special Sign Permit 81-4 November 16, 1981 Page 4 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exceptional or extra- ordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the properties in the same zoning classifications as demonstrated by other commercial uses within the general area. 3. The granting of :.his request will constitute a special privilege because the applicant has several options available that fall within the scope of the ordinance code as outlined below: a. A reduction in the sign area of the existing Oldsmobile pole sign in order to accommodate advertising for the Mazda dealership: b. The addition of a wall sign on the sales office; or c. Construction of two 50 square foot, low-profile monument signs, one to replace the existing non-conforming Oldsmobile sign and the second to advertise for the Mazda dealership (this option would require approval of a special sign permit by the Planning Commission) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On-premises signs are categorically exempt from C311fornia En- vironmental Quality Act requirements (Section 15111, Class 11, State EIR Guidelines) . FUNDING gOURCE- Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reverse the Planning Commission's action and approve Special I Sign Permit No. 81-4. i FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1 1. Strict compliance with Article 976 will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. 2. The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area. t 3. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property lo- cated in the vicinity of such sign. 4. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. Special Sign Permit 81-.4 November 16, 1981 Page 5 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of Appeal 2. Area Map 3. Site Plan and Sign Elevotion 4. Staff Report JWP:HZ:jlm I i r bEACH MOTORS OLDSMOBILE • MAZDA o�ns��oanE 17331 BEACH BOULEVARD HUNeiNGTON BEACH, CALIF. 92647 PHONE(714) 842-6666 +' i i 5 October 29, 1981 I� City of HuiiLington Reach i� x City Council � City Clerk's Office x 2000 Main Street Puntington Eeach, California 92647 _ 1 Dear Sira: ' C%b Beach Motors wishes to appeal a decision wade by the planning commission at its October 20, 1981 meeting. i The item in question is "Special Sign Permit No.81-4" in which Beach Motors is attempting to comply with Marda Corpnration's renuirement that all currently existing Mazda signage be replaced with the newly ddsigned international Mazda identification. It is felt that if Beach Motors is denied its request, or forced to accept the Commission's options, this agency will suffer a substantial financial hardship, a loss of reputation and would be denied a privilege other comparable businesses are presently enjoying in the city. Please advis an to the earliest. we viay appear before the City Counci on this. Th k u 1fEP.C11 i S d assernion President i SW/gm 1 DM 31 ZONING -..— PLANNING ---- � ,. MAP 2 6 � --11 _,:, '► ISTRICT • SECTIONAL D .;O/Il0 •►114 It lt{0 ,+1.11, •II.rV•.1.1 tl.•1• ..• r ��y GI, caul ot0'Nua ro t7t rot af• CITY �� +��MO n(-1 .t,'tt.rw.Atwuw M'KI IYt'luo oat i0 Am%"(1 �1�� •l Nl Nxtl r� K �,• i1..w.x•1,I.1. 111xt17•INIMtrt1 rlri ;: •..� ;� :1C -. -•wM."Ir&•+w.�1 r,.n,,` w .1(NrHUN II ZUN IT � I- I COUNTY, . CALIFORNIA ' �� I rl t"1 tit Ir••• , IIx• ,,rK{dttl.;/N HexYrMu `l L�1`h r 1 :M 4t1 /w•ws.1,I�•IIlIKM11 MII„1, AMEN0E0 01, 204E CASE' '- ,� ta.tlr.gl,tl►.er.ror.ror.rn.ru.r7/.to•.7v•rl ,,ntr.7 ;.„_ 3 ,....,\ .r,...• 70{.7tt.71/.1t',IM.l7r.741.ft1.7h.tN..lt.144.107,70t.{r•7..•II.t, 17{l t.tt.tr).-w/Il.l.tttl. :i•t!: i,. �C. w..0 wr n tw11, .••w-of t,.l. rtl.tl./►l/.l.N1,1.1'Ill l.M�71.f0.►/'Ct. ... /I 11�1{ltO.r/"f7.►,•,17 4p„i t\ N AVE I !;.=s L wAANER _. + ---- T ., tw L r4 IIAS` I t MI I It�� 7• 1.i " CF-E I R2- R2 MI r MI pr\17 .J tt L` M in CF-R . t J yt71 N K CF—E � 3 IIl1t{ •r l�;HII FI � � 1:/• ,is► -Cu 1: .)v�rV�/ •wir■ M I M I M I R3 R3 C la •. V y - a: 3 i n _ l Ill 1pl RI ql R' CF`C 1•l — r 1 11 n n ►� m a l es RI-CD s 3 . R3 - �AI•co• 4 1 �-R9 Po•CO � :at-[o 1 j; 1 r1 IN3 IC4 �i MI-CD a; h1Fl ca I ta.1- cr RA-CD' n r[r-v lrl 4� a`^ Mf _ s tr•' R3 Rz C4 1 CF-R t R3 R2 'id /rItiri Y *•; ..l1.!- ..•rl� c• I S �- — ' MI-CO 'f �� .'� !� 1 I Rt R2 Ifml-CI. V + L�• r TAlSER1 s W_q Lrm Vi PIP 1pluos.)rolao Hu:IT;; suiD• 100-p� 3a-v•},_ �„ _2,�-a• , toJr-o'� P. 4. Al ca Vs - � - - - �� '"���`!,RSjG"- '"wit.'•-''�. ��`_ huntingtdn beach development services department S-Af f REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development Services DATE: October 20, 1981 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 1•10. 8 1___4 Applicant: G.M. Signs, Inc. Date Accepted: 2228 Hollywood Way October 5, 1981 Burbank, Calif:. 91505 t•tandaY.ory, Processing Request: To remove existing 8 'X17 ' December 5, 1�.81 pylon sign, 25 ' high install a 416' X22 ' meta' Zone: C4 and plexiglas pylon sign on steel structure, 34 t General feet, high. General Plan: Genera? Commercial Location: Subject property is lo- E cited on the west side of tistincl Use: ticach Boulevard, north of C4 , Hic;I1w�1y t_'Ji'a111C1•%:ial Slater Avenue. Acreage: 0.90 t acre i } I 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Based on the findings outlined in Section 7.0 of this repoirt, the staff recomsiends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 81-4 . 2.0 GENI VAL INFOP.MATION: Special Sign Permit No. 81-4 is a request to permit the recon- struction of an existing non-conforming, freestanding pole sign. The new freestanding pole sign would be 99 square feet in area, 34 feet in height. The subject sign would he located at an existing car dealership on the west side of Beach Boulevard 300 feet north of Slater Avenue. 3.0 SUMMARY OF IESUEG: The major issue related to Special Sign permit No. 81--4 Is whether the conditions related to the site justify granting re- lief from the provisions of ordinance code by the following findings: A•FM-13A 4 �- �a ti ' October. 20, 1981 Page 2 1. Strict compliance with the sign code will zesult in a sub- stantial economic hardship. 2. The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area. 3. The proposed sign will not Le detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such sign. 9. The proposed sign doer not obstruct pedostr.ian and vehicular traffic vision. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On-premise signs are categorically exempt from California Environ- mental Quality Act requirements (Section 15111, Class 11, State EIR Guidelines) . 5.0 SURROUNDING LAND USES, ZONING, AND GENERF:L PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property% General Plan Designation: General Commercial i Zone: Highway Commercial Land Use: Auto Dealership North of Subject Property: General Plan Designation: General Cormnerci.al Zoning: CQ, Highway Commercial Land Use: Retail Commercial South of Subject Property: General Plan Designaticn: General Commercial Zone: Highway Commercial District Land Use: Vacant West of Subject Property: Gane::al Plan Designation: General Commercial Zone: R3, Medium-High Residential Land Use- Apartments East of Subject Property_ General flan Designation: General Commercial Zone: Highway Commercial Lanes Use: Retail Commercial 0 ♦ , 1MI/IN� Jam`, a SSP 81-4 October 20, 1981 page 3 it 6.0 ANALXSIS: proposed pole -sign would be located on the site of an reet front existing Mazda/Olalershiesdealership uently have two tnon-conforming £ 380 feet. The dealersh p freestanding pole signs, one for Mazda and one for. Oldsmobile automobile sales. The proposed sign would replace the existing non-conforming Mazda pole sign with a new non-co sign for the purpose of angingrtheir coprorateating a new n1090, thus necessi- i Mazda dealerships are changing tatina new signage. The proposed sign would exceed the following provisions of the , sign code: l.. Section 9760,7 estahlareeset backm0m121gn feetefrom �he2ultitate 0 feet for pole signs which right-of-way. The proposed sign would be set back 11 feet from the ultimate right-of-way with a height of 34 feet. 2. Section 9760.7 requires that only "one freestanding sign per " The proposed sign street frontage shall be permitted . • pole signs per would perpetuate the non-conformity of two p � street frontage. Even though staff concurs ffec the findings relating to detri- effect on other signs in the area, .and mint of property, adverse t)1e possible obstruction of pedesexare a r c vision o indicationsthatasub- can be met by the applicant, there stantial economic hardship exis circStaff umstancescorecandi- there are no exceptional or extraordinaryor premises to prevent tions applicable to the land, buildings, the site from being advertised as outlined in Section 9760.7 of the ' ordinance code. icant consider one of the fallowing Staff recommends that the appl U 'on in the sign area of the existing options: 1) A r�:duc..i for Oldsmobile he po1F sign in nrderaafaamwallpsigneonithegs�ales toffice; Mazda dealership; 2) The addition or 3) Construction of two SO square foot, low-profile monument signs, one to replace the exist�hen�dazdandealershipd (mhbsle sign oPtion and the second to advertise forthe planning 1 would require approval of a special sign permit by Commission) . I 7.0 RECOMMENDATION: �� ommission may deny Special Sign Permit No. 81-4 The Planning C based an the omming that the conditions which would necessitate relief from the str.iv' application of the provisions of Article 976 do not ex':St- SSP 81-4 October 20; 1981 . *: �.. page 4 FINDINGS: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance code will result in a substantial economic hardship. Other options are available to the applicant, in- cluding wall signing on the sales office or reducing the square footage of the Oldsmobile pole sign to accommodate Mazda. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated any exceptional or extra- ordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the properties in the same zoning classificaticns as demonstrated by other commercial uses within the general area. 1 3. The granting of this request will constitute a special privi- lege because the applicant has several options available that I fall within the scope of the ordinance code as outlined in the Analysis section (Section 6.0) . i ATTACHMENTS: I ' 1.. Area Map 2. Site Plan dated MZ d f _r I � 'I Publish 11-5-81 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO 81-4 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of � � P.M. , or as soon thereafter as j possible on gdAY . the �� day of November ly 81. for the purpose of considering Special Sign Permit No. 81-4, a request to permit i a 919 square foot pole sign, 34 feet in height. The subject site is an existing auto dealership located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, approximately 300 feet north of Slater Avenue. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. f• ' I All irterested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (7)4) 536-5227 DATED October 30, 1981 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ti By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Publish 11-5-81 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO 81-4 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council (. of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of �4____ P•M• � or as soon thereafter as i Possible on ---_1�ntlaJc;.,,..—_ the may, day of November for the purpose of considering Special Sign Perm l9 81. g it No. @1-4, a request to permit a 99 square foot pole sign, 34 feet in height. The subject site is an existing st ng auto dealership located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, approximately 300 feet north of Slater Avenue. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. t t All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and ex { opinions for or against said appeal press their Further information may be obtained from the Office of h Street, Huntington Beach. California. 9P648 _ the City Clerk, 2000 Main (714) 536-5227 DATED October 30, 1981 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BLACH BY: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Publish 11�5-Q1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO 91-4 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council Of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of ---_71 .. P.M. , or as soon thereafter as Possible on the - 16 h day of November , 19 8l. for the purpose of conside�•ing Special Sign Permit No. 81-4, a request to permit a 99 square foot pole sign, 34 feet in height. The subject site is an existing auio dealership located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, approximately 300 feet north of Slater Avenue. A legal description is on flip in the Department of Development Services, I I All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further infornw lion may ' y be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, ZOOO Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED_ October 30, 1981 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BY: Alicia F1. Wentworth City Clerk I' BEACH MOTORS OLDSMOBILE • MAZDA [kUSi0Y111 17331 BEACH BOULEVARD HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF. 92647 PHONE 1714) 842.6666 October 29, 1981 G City of Iiunticrgton Beach � City Council (' City Clark's Office 2000 NWIn Streat Huntington Beach, CA11fornis 92647 � Dear Sire: Beach Motora wishes to appeal a decieirn made by he planaing co.ssission at itl October 20, 1981 meeting. i The item in question is "Sptecial Sign Permit No.81-4" In which Usch Motors 11 attempting to comply with Mssds Corporation'@ requirement that all currently existing Xkzda aiggnage be replaced with the newly ddsidned international Hamlin identification. It is felt that if Beach Motors is denied its request, or forced to accept the Coasnission's options, this agency will suffer a substantini financial hardship, a lose of reputation and Mould be denied s privilege other comparable businesses are presently enjoying in tha city. ?tease advis� as to the earliest we may appear before the City Councij, on this. .SUCH u, 1 • �d as..r�na CG President SW/gm IN flit: Superior Court nr'TIfC ,-TA-rvI)F'f•AL1FORNIA hr and[tot the Ciainf It of(kan¢e CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH+ PLANNING Mtlu)FIIF'IR1F11Ir 'rinN Public Hearing tittiM rd l'alifnrnin 1 VIa-nti,4d0ranl;r M _ Jeannie L. Thomas ,, "°r M PkPFEM1t" NO?1CIt is Hymy GrM tlst a That I am and at all times herein mentioned wan a ritirro of Will be,how by tw QM the tauter1 tilalIPA-n%er the aKe of twenty-one year%.end Ihst i Husunetoa Bob& CalifN" t.► 00 pwpna et a odiewc gPWW *a Pap. INPpe^l' am nut M part} top,nor interested in flit" entitled matter; alit 1Va tlta,a"WMd lu per so that i am the principal clerk of the printer or the losx t&aim34(at In H un t i n a t o n Bai z c h In?,. Review ,ttowaa.ard,�i"t yy inn Aid sane aLir k+cs4d ar tea awt aide d Goad 11ltata►A.seua.A I.trJ dwni 1-Y a 1146 n new►paper nlgenersl rirrulalion.published in the t'ity of x�iaw '0t d 1> � Huntington Beach at7&Dya.ON0ate6bei01401liafsw Nat1eWlP�tr IGt1�1 Caeca eata.alis.r. of ter Civk ('aunty of Orange and which newt p Cam' MM fNals� f"�0e paper is uhlished fur the B.atkcAwwda. rMrmination of hKal treys and intelliarni*of a Krn•ra1 rharac- Alf batamtad yaripm an im*W a ter. end which newspaper at all times herein mentioned hid suaad "W bw* lid axprtw uwk and still has a Nittafide aulasrriptinn list of papayingaulrscrilrers. or"disea fa parUbe Pwtmw Apr'• APPtrwJ eral8ira PMsk F1ae1•x. and which nrwepaper hits been eatahlished.printer) and pub• rw%Nw tolianwaia my ba°bta"'"t liahed of regular intervaia in the said Gtunty of Orange hor a bmiliecayfuea tko+ne.at. .taplrr,�bw .itaYt87Jt. period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the M.rl . f. enneard is a printed copy.has hrtn published in the regular (TryPlAN"1 tiOCONM ION and entire issue r1(said ntwr . y supplement ArlA►1d y rAUN. proper,and not in an au t lament fswatary Iherefif.un the(aittswing dates,tip wit: )Srb.O^rt Irel 1Luat �'f'�*'tad Nw rIIIS/ October 8„ 1981 1 rrrtifv lar declare)under penally of tkrjury that the fnreto• tnt;ist trur and nwrect. I (fatedat...GAr.d.tn..0.r.ay.e ....................... I'alifornia,this .9 t h ,day of.D.C. t9 LSignature �3 . 2? rN-Mn G.r Asia NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCIIF:DL'I.E PUIILIC HEARING , r TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: )F—qF,,GMqt 2041 t.S PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC. HEARING USING THE ArrACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE •DAY OF �IO� M'ESE 19$� AP's are attached ✓r AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Comminsion Planning Department I Petition Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) ` YES NO Refer to 5tp A% 7XLIEV!! ay ____._.._. Planning Department - Extension r� S$•fo0 for additional information. If appeal , please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal . 31 t 1. Si(ins, Inc 167•-311-u4 a2U liallpwmd Way SrAmial. Sign Pentit 91-4 Stasel ►)Uve1UL1A--r.L Co. � lsurlkutk, Calif October 6, 1981 Qll) 3550 C:aluen3a ulva. �ti�•st � .i1505 u,u.verstl City, Galii 90068 165-225-OU 165-2251-01 165-234-13 . ltc_�11itr3lc! Ue LaCUesta l erol Belle�er Sidney �laasetiiun 7d11 Glenco Avenue 17242 l:a Street 17331 itch Blvd thurtimiton beach, Calif 92647 Iluntingt9ml3each, Calif lluntimit m mwcli, C a .11 ' 92647 92647 1.65-215--09 165-225-02 11illiam G Sus = Roger i Scizaidt 3035 C uuntry Club Drive 18350 Mt Stewart Circle Costa Wesa, Calif Fountain Valley, Calif 92626 92708 165-283-13 165-225-03 aiyisu Medical En Brddrick A 1111 bath 21530 S Pioner Blvd. 1237 Reeder Avenue Ikxwtiian Gardens, Calif Cbvina, Calif 9U715 91724 165-224-14 165--225-04 riank K Yorita Bill S Tsai 18342 E Adam Ranr-h lid liar Lam Tu Villa Parts, Calif 2614 Tiffany Place 92667 Fullerton,. Calif 92633 165-224-15 165--225-05 Eric Lauterer Donald Ybst et al 3171 Lstara Avenue SdabMW Investment Cb. Lou cmigeleso Calif 10065 1107 E Chapman Ave i)10d � Orange, Calif 92667 165-224-16 167-311-01 Burton Seller Mani L Maunik j 7921 E Garnw-r Street 820 Sew Str�-et Marra Lleac h, Calif Pa x1mna, Calif 9UU0j 91103 165-114-20 167-311-02 c�lctri:► b myers Lambert Ross 1513 tl dth Street 7405 Chula Vista tioisc:, Idaho YuOca Valley, Calif d37U,e 92284 1G7-311--03 Jat�tcl Arrabt awi Ronald N Steiner lb622 Nalu Circle 2999 E. Ocean Blvd #11.40 llwttin•�wl Ikmdl, Calif Long lsc Ch, Calif 90803 92649 41A at. eel. J( 1� City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box ISO CALIFORNIA 92601 OFI:ICL 0I4' 1'ff ('I rV CLERK t September 16, 1980 Mr. Bob Holden, Site Development Coordinator Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc. 1200 N. Harbor Blvd. Anaheim, California 92803 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, September 15, 1980 denied your appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 80-6. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to pro- visions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Prozedure of the State of California you have ninety days from September 16, 1980 to apply to the courts for .iudicial review. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact the Development Services Deparbi?ent - 536-5271 . Alicia M. Wrnf.wni Ili City Clerk AHW-CB:rd frn losut e cr: City Attorney i Director of Development Services I 1 t• }. § 1094.5 SPECIAL I'uul•EEDIM.S Il;i:t f1a1C 3711 ut;tuwl•vl (ul taa Ir1.1{ •L• pn%.,. 1'or••.••I t. 1:•nu•1 .u,ni ; n•r 1,'u! lu. I Fi .(•i.••if •', t• 1'nli(1lrllin I'twtowl..11111•.11 I11+. .tpg...11 1.'r1' • ttro--r.,Air lliljl;! 126 ('ul.nplr. ',lo, :,? 1'..1.:L1 �:1. 1.1u.•. Inr. t, �..I ir.l,l I Ilu;ll 1" 1'.u.li(.Ir. �', /r '1'tlnl ruutl'N jndgau.ul •Lotto %toil .•f Vol I' u,nlulalr 1.1 .wnnp.•I Ihrr,I.,r of .I;... ,lun•' I':..I tl:,l 1••n•• . . , to Mrl s1•IQr L,. drri•i.,4 r.tul.in� IrIiU.•u t�t c;.Il. m ..i:%•.• .d .nul.lt •l.11, ,1:,1.•1 ' lilr•n.r ax nlrrnoft pil..t lu Lu.inr.* .•1 11 .1 -6.• .. ., _1i1U. .,( lui•w•.1,.ln,t iu ►.• • IN•xt 1'1.111r1,1 1,:IM IrlvI.r•1 1114.1 1':w..• It- lit-„%{„,! pll�.'1.• l,w..l•{. Irw•III II.%' III.'. awl i •,, lawl.1111 In llial 1.at11 %%ills .III rr1;uP• lu 1•.11U 111114; :1u1 .,rl.'IiUg: Ilwit I'll •. n•uuuul nnr fu I1i11•Ilwwr (w,r pulla..r %•f ,L,tr., wl...o••.,•, ,n 1„•:,ring; lade ' :►t• . rrrnn•i•lrril, t h. a•o:,lt .rr ;•w 11• ' 1 i _ ! � 1 I u.lt in, 1;Ii1 ,.nor ...r,u,li•.hu/ rti,l.L.r t,a:r, u.- l � ;i`•' INuttrl. whera 11 w'a,% (ntlnd 111:11 M.11111• ..f 11 •11•r.l wilt :1. 1.1 w6:11 lu.l6 Ows. fill toIll" r•llar(;r,I nKulu.l prtilinlier \rrrr two .at. 14 II•,• ill-. ''v�:•' k I wlrlht II .li•l two require Ilse slit. t, I I )• YC1•IPw%'r. tt'111,;1i%•{.1 \'. Illrl 1'••.Ill 4.1 npl«••11 1q1 tlpga•nt (will il••I,- 1 r{N• 1►irn•lur of Agirld•tillutt• llII7_•) lll:o ('ul. lo,nl nuar.lin .rnl•1r Itpi.i ••lrrli writ of 1 '_. 11111r,I:Il1,'.ZI('.A;:,1'_t1C1, ot.lu•l,.tr, afl.•r Irter•in„ Ibr ju,lglm'ut n( ' t r . I. i1•r , I1. ri.m.1111 11r lit-lit,inr r••\irtr it.I.-oiul br t folio- •r w ullr■lonrr of Irrtlw,nUiun.r of L,•nuil to l.1 Ihl 1v•nunl••i•m fur r r1.,.r.•idrtalil,u, thallCr tnllu� ri;111+ of KI, 1.•1...1.11•rl, 1%hrrr Il, n• ".it •iwil'Iri1\ u( (n jr fur. .1 ♦,111111 IN• rt•111111s,1. 1 lot rullrriur 1umi fur I.•Ill.•III1r IrIImal Lf III,• II.M'11111,'lll•+ Ua Ll1 I: ..f Ilu•.I:u.•.. 1'rall 1. I,... .+,1hrf.•,+ 1'wn• wLlrtulihnliuu %limber Ilu•rn ago, ►nb,l tit- �i I to .upl..al %nnuni•.iu,,.•r•N It 1•itil S.nirr 1'uuwi•.iuU 1:1::1 i Ion) rl i,ru'w fiudlu(:m, Tilts-re o.vtorl impruperl) dri%•t- t41 I I ' ' t••�. •. � �• � R 1094.6. dutirtal review; d%ri�iuns of %orl clillun; ! • I filing; lints; recurd; deelsiull alld parly dcfincll; or f divanrc or r(:.oluliurt (it) Juliici;tl ravicw of ally derisiull of a loval agelley, (,;Iler than • 4 school disll•icl, as the Ilion !oral al;rlu'y is drfint•rl ill Set-linil 5.1951 of the Government (.'ogle, or of ;Illy rnnuuission, hnarrl, officrr or n„ent lilt%1•e %nay be h'o Ixnxuallt la tilrcllun 11J!)L:► of this co;le only If llle pefilioll for writ (►t i11;11111ate InII-sluml it) mirk srcliott is filed wilhill the 11111e limits spa'ifled in Ihis se(rtiuu. M Ally such lielilioti shall be fihvl lint Ia1t!r Chun the !loth Clay following the dale un which the devision bt'conit.s final.- If Ihere is no provision for rmonsidcrriIfoil of the dveislnn in ally applivable provi• � slop of ally stntule, rh:u'Uer, or rule, fur the loll I-juIsrs of this: se.'linp, the(Icrision is filial on till' dale. it is %moor. if uiev• is such provislon ' far reconsideration. Ill#: (Iovision is final for III(! put-Ilusrs of this ;rc- Ilort upon the CNIrir:iliurl of Ihr I!!Irit)(l during; t►'ilirh surll lI`runslller;t- lion ran tll.%Sought; providr(i, that if r(collsi(!t'r:ttloll is sought pursil- ant to any such prut'isii:►n tllr (Irf•isi(ill is !iIIA f(il' ille lnu•I,o;cs of this s(`cllun oll 111L.I :11r 111:11 rovonsillrialiun I, r('jecled. 11.1 The rnI111,11•II' II.1'ilill 111 III(' lent 1't•tlilli',: !Al:ill ho pi-op.111\11,,' 1, 1111• IiN':Il .1:11.111t' no il'i 1`IIIIIIIo1"••llm. I,11'1141, 111111'1.1, IIr :U;I III which 111mil. tilt- Ill•visiuu .I1111 !,11:111 Iw Ilrlit•rr ili l•11 11► Ills, Ill•lnlll•r tilMINI W allvi. (it- im'• illrlt is wIit1r11 it'11111•'4 11l1'Irlul'. 'fool• lilt-ill ;1;;1!11('y ni;ly rrrli�rr frluli lilt, poliliunt'r it:: .r, In:11 cw,k fur trallst-ribitig or ,It Otherwise i►i-cl►;ll'llig 111v record. `;llt 11 IccOld :,!Boll lllchl01! the trall- sr►ipi of Ihr ilrurrrdini;ti, all plr:ulin.^,r,, ;111 n,ltil(:K :tilt% I rJrl:,, any' ( prupoNell derision 113' ;1 lu',uing ullirw', lilt' fill-11 H1.1'1.iun, :tli a(ltrliticd ''j .!Yl"•1•ii�'' 'f •'.i: .4� '�•''�'1 ��':' •1' 1'l ; r"al/l �••, if.o J lI !' i •y ;11�•'(.,�=tlr,�l,w-' l 1 t, 1 � {�L�rt�.ti,• ';,��'� 1ygi,''1• ti 'tj 11 r / •�3( ,1','i,. � i•1ft'�., i . � w �...l ;:1t•:�i."•it.. 4f !••... .1 A_ 71 t• rv' �u't'y ,,1,`�•1'I�'a . a. �• , Y,'1•f Y 111 •J 4�:�.. .a..'.�..:+..ti--►"s:. f �'i - -••..,•.:Gs.,+'iJ1'��+.�.i��'.......r..,s�J �L.......r ..JI... Title 1 WHIT OF MANDATE 109,4r.v ` "��";►J' exhibits, all rejected exhibits ill tile posses'slon of the loval Iigelmy or its conurliscion, board, officer, or agent, all wrillen twirluce, and any other pallel'S fit the Case. r (d) If isle Ilt'tiliuner filers tt I•c(Itiest far Ih1' 1•rrnrd as spIcifivil ill /vl,llivixintt (c) within 10 Clays 011'1, ihr (1;111• Ihl• d1Y•.sitln bevonu:, li• 11i11 as provilled in siltittiviMolt (11). fill' little within \\11ir11 .1 p-tiliriri pttl-;anal lu Sediail im) .r Carly II(• filar ::Mill he eximovd to not Lmet. �� 1 than tilt: Wilt day fallowing the date oil trlli('h the rerur'11 is cilllrI. personally delivemd or inalled to the petitioner or Ids uttorney of Ive- ord, If he hus one. f,''�►p ,> M As twed In this section, decision means ntijtWicatory ndinln- lsit-alivo clmlxion nlude,'aftor hearing;, suspending, dentuting, oc Ills- t;':'`'�7 .�►�` missing an officer or employee, revoking or dallying all) application ;• tar It permit or n license, or denying; tin application for nny retire- meat benefit or allowance. M In making a final decision as defined In subdivision (e), file lex','tl ag;envy shall pixivide notice to the party that the fiine within t` t which judicial review nitist be sought is governed by tills xectlon. As uscil In this"subdiv)s)on, "party" means nit officer or cm- t�� '�• ployee who has been suspended, demoted or ditilnissed; a whose permit or license has been revoked or whasc application fcr a ! gx'rinit of license has been dcnled; or it person whose tipplic'ation for 4 it t•cthvnient benefit or allomancr has been denied. (g) rois section shall be applicable In a Loral agency only if the 1 1 l goterning Lvaixt thereof ,f ndnglts an ordinant-P or i s0i ilia i11r1)ting;itils { 1 SeCtlon uplillcable• if such ordinance t:: tclsolation Is alupt(vl, Ihtt ,;,►9�`y��` lirovlsiong of this section shall prevalt over any c•onflirting provision •'}�`%�t , In any otherwise appiicilble ltlev I-Cl;Ititig to the subjixt matter. sir i}. (Acidcd by tilats•1996,c.276,if.!tits,11.) 1• t , '1y1; Forms j 13t :1 Sri,Wrr.t'rt t'nliforialt(%%to r'orni-i.vigil l'n+trhirv. '1-•t� S r Library References � .1s144nhltnlltr salts' ■hd t'nlrcdnrl• t'••Iti. l'IIl11ir Adinhii.lrnii,r Ill>.lir•I nod •".,•�i��ry�`• Cai�1'. 1'ru.•r.lutr ! na. ,•', r Notts of Uecislnnari7 ;•. :;f pclleral 1 11..0 pnldi.' rulldnl nw•.,1 rs 1:111nn•. 1..1.ud f„�i 1�r, Esh3f1.r1va at adminMrative remedies 1.1,.1 1'"'111 i11' 111•' , J 1 11'Ilhll 111 .1.'11'1l,lill.• r1 � !Y. II•r y11Lut lu.nli's• Ih.lr;;rr Ii••,r 4 , ImA •'••'�••'•'•' jlKllll'.1; tl tl.i, ill 11/'1{ 1.1 1.•;il i,.r'.• l.rll,f l.' Ii,� (+ ��•• ILIn .nlanl.l•. r.lu1.• IIIIuJir, tt „• I. In gCncral u.l.l.•r 111,• L'.•I Lf A,I I1i.•1 swill rrl..1 ul •.4��p��".t'}. IIIIIL111.1311 ifs l'I1Ug UI C. .111IIIj; 11 fll ill LGll..lull• Iw rorq(u 1!It(.•'r• L�,}' \ 1.'.1+11•+)1' s;ll.ltll'+ 11i1•'r 1•;.ij111il+l; I•r two 1. ..1.1.'Ill 111 All-Ili.I 111..1 1.11.•'1•• Iw r:li•1' tear, u111h• 4"1111nr1 pr,•IIi:.Ilnll• -hli w s.l f••r1.on. 1•':Il Lrrn. Aww Wr Val. 1l•1t� a1'rr pr4.1111I•, nrr1141,1) 111.f. nn 11ohlif I.•r tie.%.Illl.lrt Vdfh 114.1, A."It t. \rains rt.tld a,r 2 practiri' It, 6-1.1011t/ ul tilt, itfhM.1 Art eu (W19) Ifii i'gl,ltplr. 11, KY 675 �C,i;, r y • 'r•`1rY 1 t' r 'f. (J•V .141 ,r•. Il •r•. '+'. I' .1 ! • 1 i � •��1 L .l.J%Y'1•wY T �,/j��•�1� 4NrR"..I Lill �.�lyJ1•S•1.j.r i':It^�i�iM:t.r Y:• •�•.�'.Ji'�:J J�'. ,'•M•. .i:1.�� �. � '' '. . •L,:•,Il,y-• .., .i`�,•I? !I����V ..z.'1'1��,1. , it T„�'"'r'�t•471"�,:�. ''j•...�r.:}�:•,y.J�..,X•lry7'1�.-r �.•.� 'rjll'Pt,�,,, � .....w..-,-�,• `t � � c. ',"t'l�f�1.�''ry't f. ., .�1' 1 � 'I 1 t',r �' r• q, • ,�' 1 I , REQUEST FOR CITE' COUNCIL ACTION i! Submitted by James W. Palin Department Development Services Date Prepared Fugusi- 22, ' 19 80 Backup Material Attached lJ Yet No Subject APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT N0. 80-6 LOCATED SOUTH OF EDIGNER AVE. , APPROXIMATELY 550 FT. EAST OF GOTHARD. City Administrator's Comments Approve as Recommended Statement of issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: L� STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commission denial of Special Sign Permit No. 80-6, a request to allow a 39 sq. ft. freestanding sign an property zoned C-9, Highway Commercial. RECOMMEMTION: The Planning Commission and the Planning Staff recommend that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 80-6. It is also recommended that the City Council adopt the findings as imposed by the Planning Commission on August 5, 1980. ANALYSIS: APPELLANT: Carl Karcher Enterprises by Bob Holden 1200 N. Harbor Blvd. Anaheim, Calif. 92803 +. APPLICANT: Some as above LOCATION: South side of Edinger Ave. , approximately 550 ft. east of Gothard St. REOUEST: To permit the construction of a 39 sq. ft. freestanding sign which is approximately 5 ft. 6 in. high by 13 ft. .long. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION_: ON MOTION BY BAUER AND SECOND BY KENEFICK SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. ! 80-6 WAS DEUPED-~WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: � 12 o 3f7Q � jfpo— r� � I 1 Page Two FINDINGS: 1. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to other shopping centers within similar zoning districts relating to location of property, shape of property, or topography. 2. The existing freestanding sign is sufficient in meeting the identification needs of the shopping center based on the intent of Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. AYES: Bauer, Kenefick, Porter, Schumacher 1 NOES: Bannister ABSENT: Winchell; Greer ABSTAIN: None DISCUSSION• Special Sign Permit No. 80--6 is a request by the applicant to allow the continued use of an existing freestanding sign that was constructed without benefit of the City's approval. The existing 39 sq. ft. free- standing sign Is 516" high by 13' long and is internally illuminated. The main exposure of the sign is oriented towards east bound traffic on Edinger Avenue. The main background of the proposed sign is brown with a molded wood grain finish. The sign is double-faced with plexiglass letters which are yellow with gold trim. The columns of the proposed sign are wood-covered and are stained dark brown. Existing freestanding signs located on the 304 ft. wide parcel include the subject sign, a 19 ft. high freestanding sign and a temporary pole sign advertising "Her Closet" Ladies Fashions that has also been erected without City approval. The existing 19 ft. high freestanding sign presently identifies Carl 's Junior Restaurant•, Frazee Paint Store, All State Realtors and Aaron Brothers. Staff analysis of the site indicates that if three freestanding signs are approved for the subject location the average distance between signs will be 75 £t. This relatively short distance would increase the density of signs located on Edinger Avenue which would result in a very cluttered appearance to this new shopping center. Rather than increase the number of signs located on the subject site, staff suggests placing a "name' or "theme" on the existing sign for customers to identify with. If individual advertising is absolutely essential for each business within the shopping center, then a smaller area should by used on the existing sign for advertising purposes. The Planning Commission and staff concur that one freestanding sign on the site meets the intent of the Ordinance Code and is sufficient in size to advertise the shopping center. It is also the opinion of staff that having primary frontage on Edinger Avenue and a wall sign identifying the restaurant adds greatly to the advertising capabilities of the Carl' s Junior facility. Page Three Approval of an additional sign at this location will increase the visual impact of signs on Edinger Avenue and may constitute a special privilege to the applicant. Staff feels that approval of this Special Sign Permit may set a precedent for other commercial centers within similar zoning districts in Huntington Beach. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to other shopping centers within similar zoning districts ralating to location of property, shape of property, or topography. 2. The existing freestanding sign is sufficient in meeting the identification needs of thEI shopping center based on the intent of Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reverse the Planning Commission' s action and approve Special Sign Permit No. 80-6. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Strict compliance with Article 976 will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. 2. The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area. 3. The sign will not be detrimental to the proposed g property located I in the vicinity of such sign. 4. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. f SUPPORTING _INFORMATION: 1. Letter of Appeal '. 2. Area Map 3. Site Plan and Sign Elevation 4. Staff Report I Respectfully submitted, 1 I James W. Palin, Director Department of Development Services JWP:SMS:gc I„yl►. F Superior Court OFTHY STATE OP CALIFORNIA ! In and for the County of Orange ' i C11Y OF HUNTINGTON BEACHs CITY CLERK minoF of mi)i yATioN Public Hearing 80-6 i. ,}_ To Stateoremifornia ) �' County of Orangr ►ss. If Rita J. Richter ysrts, KMs yy That I am and at all times berein mentioned was a citizen o; �t~MeLil io 1 the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that ' am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; fq that I am the principal cierk of the printer of the sf/�ss �"a ibu ce* M. M jM Us ti/►its HUntington Beach Independent Review a newspaper of general circulation,published in the city of Is Huntington Beach TOM, County of Orsnge and which newspaper is published for the F• , y:rt,;.; disemittation of heal news and intelligence of a general charac- ter. Rnd which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had �« y;,,•, s 1 and still has a botta fide subscription list of paying subscribers, I and which newspaper has been established,printed and pub• t ttrls. lished at regular IntArvals in the said County of Orange for a period eim ding one year, that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy,has been published In the rrgulaT end entire Inue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement : h';, thereof,on the following dates,to w'it August 219 1980 certify(or decclore)under penalty of perjury that the frrego• ing is true and correct. Dated at.................•Garden-Grove............ Califunia,thu . z1eda.of..A..P4) ..,.,8G0_ igtuture I Farm lh CAF-81380 I ! �,a.vi Karcher Merprt5Cs Curlx�ratc Ik•:+cbqu.•srters �. r •�i o 1200. otth 1llrbof A()uit-%1t� 1 o kWln$Atkkm;NO.I"4,: Alutx4rm G11 onga U2803 (M17745700 Ilob lioldett siteticveloprttetit cuordirtator 71417'8-7164 1 i I I I a RECEIVED I3I1-019 CITY DIERK OF NJNTINCTO Q UI3,CALIF. Luc i� Q os proo CARL KAUGHCR 9NTERFN13cs 1116 N HAR11004 OLVO. • ►O• •OA 4141 A N A H[I4. CA LI f•OR11IA 02101 T K L C 0 H O N t 1 1 1 41 1 7 4•5 1 0 2 August 13, 1980 City Council of Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Bench, CA 92648 Re: Car.l's Jr. Restaurant #262 7480 Edinger Huntington Beach, CA Honorable Members of the City Council: The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach denied Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc. application for a special sign permit 080-6 on August S, 1980. Carl Karcher Enterprises appeals that decision to the City Council, Item number 2 of the findings for denial states that the existing shopping center freestanding sign is sufficient in meeting the idenification needs of the shopping center. Three (3) business's are unable to procure any sfgnage on the existing sign. Carl Karcher Enterprises proposes to relinquish their position on the shopping center sign provAded that Curl Karcher Enterprises is granted continued use of the existing Carl's Jr. freestanding sign. Carl Karcher Enterprises respectfully requests that the City Council grant us a hearing on this decision. Respectfully submitted, CARL K.4RCHER ENTERPRISES, INC. I B3io-lden ; Site Development Coordinator Construction BH/rt CARL'2 CHAR/ROILKnf • CAUL-!1R.RCSTAURANTS • TACO Of CARLOS RLSTAUVAUTf•SINCK 1141 r r !1[ 11 \\4\1 lilt • M � � ! _._. rMrl►� �Z 5 f phi .. • - _ , cz PPI - .•!-__gin, �, li; -���/ � �� CF-E -•� _ �. �—� _ f�' /ter �r ' . R 5SP80 5 �� "le "u%11%r.IOff BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION C «►r. „rya ,_._ , ti , Aaron Brothers >, .►�- N� . Art Marts • 1 1 f J-t lit q I i I lh I I Ica y i . - 7 7� i� 11 lr�4l C. ,1 •�/J i MI .6 � r � u 1 n'r - Ir'! rr'.r Ir.• h+� t• 1� 3 - i 1 I� � • 6� a u• � _....e• _.f_ �.� ._..V. nt ". it an Ir IL 1 I • • • q i�. l •. �. 00 f+ -• 11 � _ � �. f Y� • t {:YA ' S ter" CAF1:l:S J�. ,{-+�. -Q�1 C N1 '7�.ram—i•: L•1+� .�,xT t EDINGER PLAZA 5urrrl�n nccra:��1 Maursrw"W =LAC" ..�..pA.., I.�;iu ('•EJ'U;!I, C,',lifCti;1;,1 ;Ull3 �I 13<__.._�_.._._.�_____. .- t • � t _ /"�tti r i. — 'iJfW, __ �� a • r- BIG - 02418 BROWN 11OLDED WOOD GRAIN FINISli --- CARL'S JR . - 15" TO 24" LTRS (INTER . ILLUM . 60 MA NEON) .02037 YELLOW N1 GOLD TRIM ELES - S{tEBT HETAL PAINTED DARK BROWN BORDER - 02793 RED H/ GOLD TRIM HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPT. "DR'M-T1lRU" 6 "lIAMBURGEItS" WHITE LEITLRS • JUL 7 1980 COLUMNS - WOOD dOVERED STAItmo OLYNPIC 9712 BROUH P. 0. Box I90 STAR - 15" to 24" 02037 YELLOW V/ REG FEATURES HuntlnBtor.Beach,CA9Y649 AAM 39 SQ. FT.' • • • 7 11 � r huntington beach development services department SYAf f E p O RT._._.,_ TO: ' Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development Services/Planning Division DATE: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO, 80-6 APPLICANT: Carl Karcher Onterprises DATE ACCEPTED: by Bob Holden July 7 1980 1200 N. Harbor Blvd. Anaheim, Calif. 92803 WVDAIMY PROCESSING Wim: September 7, 1980 REQUEST: To permit the use of an existing 13' x 3 ' ZONII.7: C--4 freestanding sign. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION• LOCATION: Subject property is General Commercial • located on the south side of Edinger, approx. ACREAGE: 550 ft. east of Gothard St. 2.71 MSi'IIJG USE: Shopping Center and Fast Food Restaurant 1. 0 SUrf;ESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 80--6 based on the findings as outlined in Section 7.0 of this report. 2. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit No. 80-6 is a request by the applicant to allow a 39 sq. ft. freestanding sign on property zoned C-4, Highway Com- mercial. The subject sign is approximately 5' 6" high by 13' long and is internally illuminated. The main exposure of the sign is oriented toward east-bound traffic on Edinger Avenue. l� A•fIHd7A t Special Sign Permit No. 80-6 Page 2 a 3.0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES: In accordance with Section 9760.44 of the Ordinance Code, the Commission may grant-a Special Sign Permit providing for relief from the strict application of the provisions of the Ordinance Code subject to a finding that the following conditions exist: a. Strict compliance with the Sign Code will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant, and b. The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the ` area, and ' c. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such signs, and d. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian and vehicular traffic vision. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On-premise signs are categorically exempt from CEQA requirements (Section 15111, Class 11, State EIR Guidelines) . 1 5.0 SURRgUNDING LAND USE, ZONING, AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: I The properties located to the north of the subject site are zoned C-4 Highway Commercial District, M-1, Light Manufacturing District and C-2, Community Business District. These properties are designated as General Commercial on the General. Plan and are developed commercial, with the exception of thc: M-1 property which is presently vacant. The property located west of the subject site is zoned C-4, Highway kl Commercial District and is designated on the General Plan as General �I Commercial and is developed commercial. �I The properties located to the south of the subject site are zoned M-1, Light Manufacturing District and R--3, Medium Density Residential. These properties are designated on tha General Plan as Industrial and High ` Density Residential. The industrial property has been developed with industrial uses, and the high density residential property is developed with apartment units. The property located east of the subject site is zoned C-2, Community Business District and is designated on the General Plan as General Commercial. This property is presently developed commercial. The subject site is currently zoned C--4, Highwdy Commercial District, and is designated on the General Plan as General Commercial. The subject property is deve bped with a shopping center and fast-food restaurant. i Special Sign Permit No. 80-6 Page 3 6.0 ANALYSIS: Special Sign permit No. 80-6 is a request by the applicant to allow the continued use of an existing freestanding sign that was constructed without benefit of the City' s approval. The existing 39 sq. ft. free- standing sign is 516" high by 13 ' Iona and is internally illuminated. The main exposure of the sign is oriented towards east bound traffic on Edinger Avenue. The main background of the proposed sign is brown with a molded wood grain finish. The sign is double-faced with plexiglass letters which are yellow with gold trim. The columns of the proposed sign are wood-covered and are stained dark brown. Existing Freestanding signs located on the 304 ft. wide parcel include the subject sign, a 19 ft. high freestanding sign and a temporary pole* sign advertising "Her Closet" Ladies Fashions that has also been erected without City approval. The existing 19 ft. high freestanding sign presently identifies; Carl' s Junior Restaurant, Frazee Paint Store, All State Realtors and Aaron Brothers. Also to be considered by the Planning Commission is Special Sign Permit No. 80-5, a request by Superior Electrical Advertising Co. , to construct a 48 sq. ft.07 ft. 6 in. high freestanding sign at the west end of the subject property. If this sign is approved, the sign will advertise four of the tenants in the existing shopping center. Section 9760.44 of the Ordinance Code requires that the Planning Com- mission find that the following conditions exist prior to approval of a Special Sign Permit application. I - a. Strict compliance with the Sign Code will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant, and b. The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area, and c. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such signs, and d. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian and vehicular traffic vision. Staff analysis of the site indicates that if three freestanding signs are approved for the subject .ocation the average distance between signs will be 75 ft. This rela :.ively short distance would increase the density of signs located on Edinger Avenue which would result in a very cluttered appearance to this new shopping center. Rather than increase the number of signs located on the subject site, staff suggests placing a "name" or "theme" on the existing sign for customers to ideni:i._y with. If individual advertising is absolutely essential for each business within the shopping center, then a smaller area should be used on the existing sign for advertising purposes. Special Sign Permit No. 80-6 Page 4 Staff concurs that o6a freestanding sign on the Trite meets the intent of the Ordinance Code and is sufficient in size to advertise the shopping center. it is also the opinion of Staff that having primary frontage on Edinger Avenue and a wall sign identifying the restaurant i adds greatly to the advertising capabilitier of the Carl's Junior facility. Approval of an additional sign at this location will increase the visual impact of signs on Edinger Avenue and may constitute a special privilege to the applicant. Staff feels that approval of this Special Sign Permit may set a precedent for other commercial centers within similar zoning districts in Huntington Beach. f 7.0 RECOMENDATION: The Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 80-6 based on the following findings: FINDIM-FQR DENIAL: 1. There .are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to other shopping centers within similar zoning t districts relating to location of property, shape of property, or topography. 2. The existing freestanding sign is sufficient in meeting the identifi- cation needs of the shopping LLnter based on the intent of Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. SMS/gc ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map f� 2. Site Plan ! 3. Sign Elevation f i t �.� City of Huntington Beach ti t+ M.O. sox too CALIFORWIA 92 M 1 ti OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK September 4. 19M Carl Karcher Enterprises 1200 N. Harbor Boulewd P. 0. Box 4349 Anaheim, CA. 92903 Attn: Bob Holden, Site Development Coordinator The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their Tweeting held September 23, 1980, voted to continue the public hearing on Special Sign Permit #80-6 to September 16, 1980 at 7:30 P. M. in the Council Chamber. For further infomation, please contact the Office of the City Clerk, 536-5227. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Aaa,,w MAI Gc�lr�w Bill 22228 Hollywood WSy, 6uibank.Caldornia 91504 f .a1�i�J Telephoc,es 849.5303 842.9356 1 ELECTRICAL f l ADVERTISING DORIS BENIM:?'T 1 1 BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO AGE AND CONDITION i I OF ORIGINAL I DOCUMENTS I I rr '•;;.y,:a:..:.s.r'a;•f c:n•rrtrc ^.i.�_:...�......,,:;.;e.s�;•:'ca'a«+�wMrr'�•I'�c�.y^++..s�r}[�`ra �:+'�Jo�0 y...t '..,w... .i....-^.'.'.».:,;:i'i.' ... ...... ....,.•:+.::.a:... .. .. .. .... .... "". '.YwL'Cn'Gtira:{+r;i it.�i�ti.!•,�'t,'�;"'ti��"•y',[�icr y • .,.+ u•.��.... .. .&.• ji*L. . . .� • r CASH RECEIPT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH r..�.•, ; , i'M�u:f`' " r%161 i1Q 15R.OG Tl r 71 r 1 1';;ti.:+fit.• '•"' ••' i�� ' i. .�y•t �•- •. 'fit '�• '•f}% Iry roilIF , ■�+�.�t � Nr l! ����,�•;(•,�r,�t • :t',• -�; ��•' } wlVn•• �Y -.'.�y.w...I tint.«n _ .. • i Publish B-21-80 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO 80-6 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, I Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Tuesday _ the 2nd day of September lfiO for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 80-69 a request to permit the installation of a 13 ft. x 3 ft.freestanding sign which has an overall height of 5 ft. 6 in. The proposed sign is to be located approximately 75 ft. from an existing freestanding sign on Edinger Avenue, The subject sign is proposed to be located on the south side of Edinger Avenue, approximately 575 ft. cast of Gothard Street in the C4 Highway Commercial District. PP Y 9 4Y A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. 1 'I All interested persons are invited to attond said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information mayJbe obtained from the Office of the. City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Publish 8-21-80 r �I NOTICE OF PUBIC HEARING l APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PFRMIT NO 80-6 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as � possible on Tuesday the. 2nd day of September , 1900 . for the purpose yr considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 60-6, a request to permit the installation of a 13 ft. x 3 ft,freestanding M sign which has an overall height of 5 ft. 6 in. The proposed sign is to be located approximately 75 ft. from an existing freestanding sign on Edinger Avenue. The subject sign is proposed to be located on the south side of Edinger Avenue, approximately 575 ft. east of Gothard Street in the C4 Hi Commercial District. �=�I lap Y 9��V { s'1 A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. 11 i All Interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal , Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATE August 15,E= CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk ti i� 1 ti NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM .QrL-t j Q ru 14-A.2. w-& TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: rszo FROM: nm/. PLEASE SCHEDULE, A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE 7-M41 DAY OF 1 —�..•�AP's are attached AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Comission Planning Department Petition -----�'"�* Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status YES No Refer to ritiy �� , Planning Department - Extension #. T�,,, for additional informatlon. * If appeal, please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal. 1 t 71 a w llmait�.'3d�►�rtiuirig simWsl sign Permit 90-5 /� �• ;� .:.+ � t.� l �s•�.• Lang DBwh, Calif try 290 1980 (JH) 9013 j FkiiUJ= AsanoiatdS 142-119-01 c/oAml otste � 1503 N TetSt AVre � �x �S1uite A P.P.O. Hoot 540b4 z� Um Anpyr,r CAM 90054 , Santa Ana, calif 92701 142-131-17 141'332-3.3 GoUArd Ave m HuiLdirg Awl h ladwon P.U. am 55l VbgbFA LYE, Cal i Pafiakmd, C;""Jf 91102 926M :1 142-121-19 142-4X1-58 Lorge circle iav "M= mac mmbjmuy mut Dsv. amp 1501 N 'Amin Avwm . Attrir R L WA ar Santa Artie• Calif 2825 8 14th Street 92701 Gakland, Car" 94616 142-121-21 142-071-66 ktaffAfty Irdmtrial Attic MVw� d y I untrial Park J A MwctJy Jr low.". rumaum O=p 334 Vir LL]o Nogd Wt. C rAd M Devins ' 104mct Bosch, Call 92G60 rJ.2 HLgh SUmt 142-121-26 Pottat mi PA 19464 bglllxliuo�l�� � i 142-121.-25 142-121-37 rY^eas+ny Lxiustrinl i��dt Mkxjt r Assvciatsc -Ww whip Food Sarviae 0o 3912 Dil et Isle U07 E Clapma Avra m oar.;m Dal Moor, Calif Suite 208 92625 Crate, Calif ,I 92666 142-071-28 So. Calif R dison OD. 19171 Mb olia sweet '} Ktnt J acbm, Flrrch, Ca1.if 92646 ; 142-121-36 Dept. of transportation uii gear As Inc i.atea 12 Carl xaL�tiar �terprisrs 0 so. %drg street .I v.o. 9= 4349 Im ��►�f9t, Calif 054 AttnArAl im, Calif 92803 m ign B l � t ' lfublirhed in H.B. dependent News July 24, 1980 r f LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 80-6 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be geld by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huptington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Special Sign Permit LAvc;nl No. 80-6,Va request to permit the installation of a 13 ft. x 3 ft. freestanding sign which has an overall height of 5 ft. 6 in. The •propiosed sign is to be located approximately 75 ft. from an ex13ting- freestanding rign on Edinger Avenue. The subject sign is proposed to be located on the south side of Edinger Avenue, approximately 575 ft. east of Gothard Street in the C4 Highway Commercial District. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services office, Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7:00 P.M. , on August 5, 1980 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are = ;vited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Special sign Permit No. 80-6 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 24th day of July, 1980 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary i i i i Publish 8-21-80 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECOAL SIGH PERMIT NO 80-6 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Tuesday the 2nd day of September , i5w , t for the purpose of conaideriny an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special ' Sign Permit No. 80-6, a request to pemit the installation of a 13 ft. x 3 ft.freestanding' sign which has an overall height of 5 ft. 6 in. The proposed sign is to be located approximately 75 ft. from an existing freestanding sign on Edinger Avenue. The subject sign is proposed to be located on the south silt of Edinger Avenue, approximately 576 ft. east of Gothard Street in the C4 Highway Commercial District. A lecal description is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. i f All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal , Furth,r information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Reach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 UATED Augu6tCITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk I _:7 Publish 8-21-80 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO 80-6 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of �7:'O P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Tuesday the 2nd day of September 1gB0 for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 80-6, a request to permit the installation of a 13 ft. x 3 ft.freestandinc,, f sign which has an overall height of 5 ft. 6 in. The pruposed sign is to be located approximately 75 ft. from an existing freestanding sign on Edinger Avenue. The subject sign is proposed to be located on the south side of Edinger Avenue, approximately 575 ft. east of Gothard Street in the C4 Highway Commercial District. A legal description is on file in the Dopartment of Development Services Office. I �I All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal , Further information may by obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. g2648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk 1.I•. :,." 00 -'�-7cfflce of the City Cie* ty of Huntington-'Beach 1 -- s ti� U.S.paj1.'.G !' s " � P.O.BOX190 CALIFORNfA92548 Cal�4' �B 30'i3oo i ADI 12 022 329NI US/2)3/80 RETURN •1.0 SENDER ! NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED y itn UNAE-LE I'D FORWARD � uf�� '?•� rx..Z�Lji .1 B11-22 C 4 oyr�-e v CULL, KARCMCR CMTCRPRISCS, INC. I111 M.MAPPROR •LVO" • F.D. •OA 1/11 A M A N[IPA, CA LIFORMIA /1 1 8 1 T { L I►M O M S, ITS 41 ] 1 t•1 1 1/ August 28, 1980 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Reach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Car.l's Jr. Restaurant 7480 Edinger Huntington Beach, CA Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: The appeal of the planning commission's denial of special sign permit #80-6 has been schedlxled for September 2, 1980. Mr. Bob Holden, Site Development Coordinator for Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc. , will be out of town at this time. It is respectfully requested that the hearing be continued until the City Council Meeting of September 15, 1980. Respectfully submitted, CART. KARCHER ENTERPRISES, INC. �. Bob Holden :is Site Development Coordinator Construction B11Ibje `. ' 4 CARL'S CMARSPOIL■RS • CAR"JR.RCSTAURAMT/ • TACO O/CARLOS 0198TAURAIITS-864CS I141 City of Huntington Beach P.O. DOX too CALIFORNIA fiiY C+� OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK July 22, 1980 Seaborg, Inc. 18799 Beach Boulevard Suite 100 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 j RE: Special Sign Permit No. 80-4 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, July 21 , 1960, overruled the decision of the Planning Commission and approved your request for Special Sign Permit No. 80-4 located at the southeast corner of Edwards Street and Warner Avenue. Said approval was conditioned by the requirements that the car sign be removed and the banners reduced by one-half. If you have any questions, please contact the Department of Development Services - 536-5271 . i Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMt:cb cc: Jim Palin, Director of Development Services I ere _'�.r�'t`` �•�.C��y. .1 'fir �{� '`. •q fyw :[ ' jr t t-�. , w+ • yqq t µfa YM 1j ,•� I me ell r•.� yr. '��' �. ,, •�. . : .. l+ I t f� ; ��I� ;• .. {.fir;;�, �t .r. �. a �' ,i•..� „�.. � . 't ti' .1' y '� "r•.rrS `�./.t�i�: tit. •'�v..� '(�: '.I•` { )( J fir. � • � � - r ' +•� . t .. Jam..'„"+ Superior Court ��- nvTtttt G b"I'ATF:pF CAI.IFURNIA In and f«r the County of Orange r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHr CITY CLERK r,H2F OFJIUBLICAlIQU Public Hearing 80-4 State of California 1 County of Orange )v 1 `�Y Rita J.Richter That 1 am and at all Timm herein mentleno4i was a ritiren of the Unite!States,over the age of twenty-tine years,and that l N Cam' j am not a party to,nor interested in the atiove entitled mutter; +s that 1 am the principal clerk of the printer of the h �� ai IMaol • Huntingtoo Beach ;nPe veVdtnt Rey�ew � a�a■ is a news a r general c•rrcu at on, u ilia ed in the Cit•of Huntington Beach � � County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the �atFM� drsemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac• ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a larva fide sulncription list of paying subscribers, A art Ma Ir t{r1 and which newspaper has)een established, printed and pub- lished at regular Intervals in the said County of Orange for a perintl exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the anneard is■ printed crrpy, tax barn published in the regular p and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement J1sss1,' thereof,tin the following dates.W wi.: I certify (or declare)under penalty or perjury that the foregn- ing Is true and correct. Doled at......... ........Gar4e±3 ova............ � J California,the/..ZQ of.,'Jpl ..19... Signature t Form No.CAF4579 REQUEST FOR CITY CCXJNCiL ACTION ` Submitted by James W. Palin Department Development Services ,;. _ Date Prepared July 9, , 19 80 Backup Material Attached [3 Yes No Subject Appeal to Plannina Commissions conditional approval of Special. Sian, pprmit No. an-4 located at the southeast corner of Edwards St. and Warner Ave. City Administrator's Comments Approve as Recommended Stater-int of Issue, Recomir zndation,Analysis, funding Source,Alternative Actions: C�,,/ STATEMENT OF ISSUE: �) Transmitted for consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commission'ts conditional approval of Special Sign Permit No. 80-4 . a request to allow six free-standing sigr►s and flags on propar.ty zoned R-3, Med;.um, High Density Residential. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and the Planning staff recommend that the City Council uphold the Planning Commissions conditional approval of Special Sign Permit no. 80-4 , allowing a total of 100 sq. ft. of sign area for identification purposes, and denying the use of flags and banners. It is also recommended that the Council adopt the findings as imposed by the Planning Commission on June 17 , 1980. ANALYSIS: Appellant: Seaborg Inc. 18799 Beach. Blvd. Suite 100 Huntington beach, Ca. 92648 Applicant: First Southern Corp. P.O. Box 2178 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647 Location . Southeast corner of Edwards St. and Warner Ave. Reauest. To allow six (6) freFl�tanding signs and miscellaneous flags and banners for the purpose of identifying a condominium project. POa V41 y Page 2. Planning Commission Action: ON MOTION BY. WINCHELL AND SECOND BY BAZIL, SPECIAL. SIGN PERMIT NO. 80'-4 WAS 4bPPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. Strict compliance with the sign code will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant because it will deprive him of the primary means to identify the project. 2. The proposed sign will not adversely affect other signs it the area because there are no signs within the vicinity of the proposed sign. 3. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of the subject sign because the signs are located along Warner Avesiue and Edwards Street. 4. The ;•roposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian and vet-'cular traffic because the sign is not located near any points of ingress or egress. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The total square footage of sign area shall be limited to no more than one hundred (100) square feet, and the flags shall be eliminated. 2. Signs shall be mounted ir, such a manner that they will not inter- fere with traffic vision on Warner Avenue or Edwards Street. 3. Any of the signs erected to advertise the units in the project for sale shall be removed one year from the date of approval of this application. 4. The Planning Commission reserves the right to rescind this special sign permit approval in the event of ary violation of the applicable zoning laws. Any such decision shall bi preceded by notice to the applicant and a public hearing, and shall be bated upon specific findings. AYES: Winchell Kenefick, Bazil, Greer, Bauer NOES: Porter ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None DISCUSSION: In January of 1980, the 259 unit Villa Warner Apartment complex located at the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Edwards Street wan converted into a stock cooperative condominium project. To identify the project, the applicant has requested approval of six signs of which two are located on Warner Avenue and three are located on Edwards St. and one at the southeast -:•%rner r ;. Warner Ave. and Edwards St. The applicant has also requeste,' approval of tl-': use of 32 flags and banners which t Page 3 DISCUSSION C'ON'T: are p posed to be located on Warner Ave. and Edwards St. The free- standing signs range in size from 15 sq. ft. to 32 sq. ft. and identify the location of the model parking area and units for sale. Section 9760. 17.4 Subdivision Directional signs. Location. of the Hunt ngtcn Beach ordinance Code stages that c) all s ns shall be set back 200 ft. from any developed property other than the property which contains the dwellings which are a part of a model home and sales complex for which the sign is intended. According to this code section, the applicant would not be allowed any subdivision directional signing on the site. However, the Planning Commision and staff rec- ognize the need for on-site advertising and feel that signing is warranted on the site. It was the majority opinion of the Planning Commission that signing for the project be limited to 100 sq. ft. which should be sufficient to identify the condominium complex. Approval of the signing as modified by the Planning Commission would provide parity for the applicant And allow him the same priveliges enjoyed by other developers identifying their projects. Review of the applicant's request for six freestanding signs and thirty-two flags indicates that signs in the general area of the site will not be affected, nor will the proposed siqns and banners be detrimental to property located in the vicinity of the proposed sign. However, _it._was.-the consensus-of the Planning Commission th•_ t 32 flays and. banners were excessive, and the 100__sa...ft. of sif7n area would be .adequate in meeting the needs of the applicant to identify the condominium project. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ' ALTERNATIVE ACTION; _ Reverse the Planning Commission's action and approve Special Sign Permit No. 80-4 as requested by the applicant. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL 1. Strict compliance with Article 976 will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. 2. The proposed signing will not adversely affect other signs in the area. 3. The proposed signing will not be detrimental to the p; -erty located in the vicinity of such sign. 4. The proposed signing does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. i) { Page 4 SUPPORTING MF'ORMATION: 1. Letter of Appeal 2, Area Map 3. Site Plan and Sign Elevation 4 . Staff Report Respectfully submitted, �*,J es W �alin, rector Department of Development Services WP:SMS:pj �I t . i t ;t `1 inti.i .. ..... ..r .� • .. .. ... ... .. ... r .. . 1 .... ....w. •.Jr t.i�..\..i.1 .-J1,r!y Mr," i , . i •`q''1fx• i it r PO BOX 549 ' SEADORG INC. 1670 iOS CALIFOANiA AVENUE 950J0 Pat.,:;e Reply To: r ry 18700 Bea.:h Boulevard r H 0 H'?' Suite 100 -r l Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �J (714) 963-5400 O O June 26, 1980 Honorable City Council City of Hunt.i.ngton Beach 2000 Main Street Hunti gton Beach, CA 92648 Re: Appeal of Planning CommLssion' s Conditional Approval of Special Sign Permit No. 80-4 . Dear Mayor and Honorable Members of the Council: By this letter, First Southern Cor. ►ioration and the Seaborg Corporation appeal the Planning Commission's Conditional Approval of our application for Special Sign Permit No. 80-4 . At the Commission's June 17, 1980 meeting, the Planning Commission approved our request to allow six pru-existing freestanding signs and miscellaneous flags to remain on the Villa Warner project at the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Edwards Street for the purpose of identifying the stock cooperative sales program which is in progress on the property. While our application requesved approval of six signs total- ing approximately 143 square feet of surface area, as well as approval of miscellaneous flags which also serve to identify the projer'-., the Planning Commission approved a total of 100 square "eat of signage and failed to permit the use of any flags. By this appeal, we respectfully request the Council to permit all of the pre-existing signs to remain in place as well as .sufficient flags and banners to identify the sales } program on the property. We believe the 100 square feet permitted by the Planning Commission is insufficient to adequately identify the property for marketing purposes. By way of background, Seaborg, Incorporated acquired the Villa Warner property approxima'.,ely one year ago. All of the signs which are the subject of this Special Permit application were on the property at that time and had been for many years. Ile removed snany small directional signs which had been located on the outer perimeter of the property. The six signs for which'we seek approval at this time were formerly promotional s; s identifying the Villa Wa. •ner Luxury Apartments. The face of th signs were repainted just prior to commencement of our marketing program for sale of the units a-, part of a stock cooperative. No new signs have been constructed on the property. Flags have been raised around the , arimeter of the property in order to identify the sale program. This Special Sign Permit application simply seeks authorization to let six of the pre-existing signs continue in r' ce for not ram, r Honorable City Council June 26, 1980 , Special Sign permit No. 80-4 Page two lla ' more than one year aering alsothe see}cemainder of authorixationetoikeepwtheer marketing effort. flags in place on the perimeter of the property. This application does not seek authorization to construct additional signs on the Villa Warner. property. Although the prior owner apparently put numerous signs in place without proper City permits, the signs have been in place for many years and are tastefully designed and landscaped. Ile simply seek permission to let them stand during the brief rerrmai.der of our marketing effort. The signs and flags are a critical part of the sales effort for the units. The on-site flags and signs bring in more prospective buyers than any other method, and serve to identify the project for those who have learned about it from other sources. As the Planning Commission found, disapproval of this Special Sign Permit would result in a substantial economic hardship to us because it would deprive us of the primary means to identify our project. The signs currently in place on the property are tastefully painted. Each sign is fairly small and located in and around mature landscaping. In fact, it is difficult to see some , of the signs from some vantage points because they are situated beneath trees along the outer edge of the property. We feel the current signage on the property is consistent with apartment site signage elsewhere in Huntington Beach, as evert a casual investigation of Warner Avenue will disclose. tie are aware of no complaints regarding either the extent or nature of the signs and flags currently standing on the property. Even the Staff Report recognizes our need for on- ! site advertising. It expressly states that the existing signs do not affect any other signs in the area and are not detrimental to any property ivcat?d in the vicinity of the , area. The signs and flags do not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular vision and are tastefully done so as to avoid a garish or carnival-like presentation. The Planning Commission basically accepted these points in i its findings and Conditional Approval of 100 square feet of pre-existing signage. However, since the signs are individually relatively small and discreetly placed, we believe a temporary permit for all six signs and some flags is warranted. Our r request is for a temporary permit only. As soon as the co-op I` units are r33d, the signs and flags will all come down. ti y, t ' i 4 •1 1 l� K June 26, 1980 ~ Honorable City Council Page three ,] special sign Permit No. 80-4 g In summary, this Permit Request merely seeks to authorize ° the continued limited use of signs which have been on the property for years. The signs and flags are the integral pa.:t of the applicant's on-site advertising program and provide an appropriate, tasteful appearance. All the signs tp and flags will be removed once the applicant's sales program ; is complete. They are necessary to the successful marketing of the units and have generated no citizen complaints of which we are aware. Forthese reasons, we respectfully , request that Special Sign Permit No. 80-4 be approved so as to pe rmit the six freestanding signs and flags to remain for a period not to exceed one year. Res ly mitted, Robe S uehlen RSM:do 4 �r RS I= 1( y I ` 1 1I M Ja, r� yr huntington beach developm,ent services department STAfF Ep ORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: June 3, 1980 5PI:CIiiL SIGN PER141T NO. 8U.-4 � i APPLICANT: First Southern Corp. DATE ACCEPTED: P.O. Box 2178 April 25, 1980 lluntington Beach, Ca. 92647 P.EQUEST: To allow six (6) freestanding MF•NDATORY PROCESSING DATE: signs and miscellaneous flags June 24, 1980 9 g and banners for the purpose ZONING: R-3 of identifying the condcminium project. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LOCATION: Subject property is located on High Densit;• Residential the southeast corner of Warner ACREAGE: 10.81 and Edwards EXISTING USE . Condominiums 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Special Sign Permit No. 80-4 as modified by staff to a 10 ft. high, 100 sq. ft. freestanding sign located at the southeast corner of Warner Ave. and Edwards St. s 0 GEITERAL INFORMATION: :special Sign Permit No. 80-4 is a request by the applicant to erect miscellaneous flags, banners and six freestanding signs .ranging in I :,ize from 3 ft. x 5 ft. to 4 ft. x 8 ft. at the Villa Warner Condo- miniun• Project located at the southeast corner of Warner Ave. and Edwards Street. The six signs are intended to identify the recently converted apartment complex for the purpose of selling the units, and to direct customers to the model parking areas. 3.0 SUI$MARY OF ISSUES: In accordance with Section 9760.44 of the Ordinance Code, the Com- y ►nission may grant a special sign permit providing for relief from i A-FM.i3A j Special Sign Permit No. 80-4 Page Two the strict application of the provisions of the ordinance code subject to a finding that the following conditions exist: a. Strict compliance with the sign code will result in a sub- stantial economic hardship to the applicant, and b. The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area, and c. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such signs, and d. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian and vehicular traffic vision. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On Premise signs are categorically exempt from CEQ.N requirements (Section 15111, Class 11, State EIR Guidelines) . 5.0 SURROUNDING LNND USE, ZONING,, AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The property located to the south of the subject site is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, is designated on the General Plan as Low Density Residential, 'ard is developed with single family dwellings. �-- The property located west of the subject site, across Warner, is zoned R-3, Medium High Density Residential and R-1, Single Family Residential and are designated High Density Residential and Low Density Residential respectively on the General Plan. The properties located to the north of the subject site and across Warner Ave. are zoned R-3, Medium High Density Residential and designated on the General Plan as High Density Residential. This property is developed with apartment units. The subject property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential, R-3, Medium High Density ReE_.dential and is designated on the General Plan as High Density Residential. The property has been developed with 256 apartment units which have recently been converted into condominiums. 6*0 ANALYSIS: In January of 1980, the 259 unit Villa Warner Apartment complex located at the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Edwards Street was con- verted into a stock cooperative condominium project. To identify the project, the applicant has requested approval of six signs of which two are located on Warner Avenue and three are located on Edwards St. and one at the southeast corner of Warner Ave. and Edwards St. The applicant has also requested approval of the use of 32 flags and j banners which are proposed to be located on Warner Ave. and Edwards St. The freestanding signs range in size from 15 sq. ft. to 32 sq. ft. and identify the location of the model parking area and units for sale. Special Sign Permit No. 80-4 Page Three Section 9760.17.4 Subdivision Directional Signs. Location. of the Huntington Beach Ordinance: Code states that: (c) all signs shall be set back 200 ft. from any developed property other than the property which contains the dwellings which are a Fart of a model home and sales complex for which the sign is intended. According to this code section, the applicant would not be allowed any sub- division directional signing on the site. However, staff recognizes the need for on-site advertising and feel a sign is warranted on the site. It is staff's opinion that a sign limited to 100 sq. ft. and i ten (10) ft. high is sufficient to identify the condominium complex. Approval of this sign would provide parity for the applicant and allow him the same rights enjoyed by other developers identifying their projects. Review of the: applicant's request for six freestanding signs and thirty-two flags indicates that signs in the general area of the site will not be affected, nor will the proposed signs and banners be detrimental to property located in the vicinity of the proposed sign. The signs and flags will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular vision because of their location, however, it is stai:f' s opinion that six signs and thirty-two flags are excessive and that one sign located at t%,e southwest corner of Warner Ave. and Edwards St. would meet the needs necessary to identify the condominium project. 7.0 RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Special Sign Permit No. 80-4 as modified by staff to a 10 ft. high, 100 sq. ft. freestanding sign located at the southeast corner of Warner Ave. and Edwards Street. FINDINGS• i 1. Strict compliance with the sign code will resu�t in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant because it will deprive him of the primary means to identify the project. 2. The proposed sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area because there are no signs within the vicinity of the proposed sign. 3. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of the subject sign because of the sign's location at the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Edwards Street. 4. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian and vehicular traffic i vision because the sign is not located near any points of ingress i or egress. j ' i Special Sign Permit No. 89-4 Page Four S SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The maximum height of the subject sign shall be limited to 10 ft. and the maximwn area of said sign shall be no larger than 100 sq. ft. 2. Subject sign shall be located totally within a landscaped planter at the .,outheast corner of Edwards St. and Warner Ave. 3. Said sign shall not be mounted in such a manor as to interfere with traffic vision on Warner Avenue or Edwards Street. 4. The Planning Commission reserves the right to rescind this Special Sign Permit approval in the event of any violation of the applicable zoning laws; any such decision shall be preceded by notice to the applicant, a public hearing and shall be based upon specific findings. t4S:gC ,0* ATTAC_MENTS: 1. Area Map 2. Site Ilan 3. Photographs of Proposed Signs and Flags i I i � I r' .. C ► C O CY•%rtL' Cf•r ji`3 N i NK •' J wA. T N .Art ft3 P.Z + / CF-R j CF-E �.,�. ..... CF•R •I CF-E � r e u � .owu - t i i I `-' T Ir----_-, r S S P 80- 4- M7hnf%r.10%MACH f7 MUNTL40TON BEACH PLANWING DIVISION I� A Ile ��! yl -i t n ,w. f! 4 t: �, �). 1>" n . �' ? t A.• 7, J 1� tY It. 1�• } y (f�l. �F"f �If ` ''. •� ofrr�., 1 r �.�.^ a'!' A'f;.ti y � � 5 ��1 � �l .^,t� 1 f� it !S,.L 11 }f�. 1, •�,. � ti�.4. arl�.!}A��}�r,^� t';., ;i� � k { r cj� t ,f � '1,wt ti +•i`T _ �!- 4�,�w .o�' r.f, ,t.�`��S c t ,,i a� ;� 1 �l �� } ., rr � rr tw ,� d � z � k l� r ► ri, T �,f f la a..xo f x i ,f: 1,r! -t�. r. D5f-•_ �y1 1t��y`� rjl 4 t~ ! fa f'�. t!�} .1:rY �r 1 t•y�; , �.,l If eb/.., • 4.i 1 1 n �� l � tr Sf`TJ,t f1w;/.'�'! i1,�1!{�A���:}Yfi`t'yk '!+,-�.f', ,4;�w��,[r��} ,�*{.`a�r,J�1�P�1• �ti�!r�hl :�,'..:;fyr4.��+1-. r'}� _.,i.r,' � ( , 1x 14 .�i,'•./ T f. j (+,T- +1 1�;�'rr�'{Y.'1�.�� f { 1��.t.1 A ! ry [ S•'• t � (�4�f j �1/1 �,f74i �,� ')1.I���.`I+�.'(!��`+.�.4Q4f fL Ly y, ..l��r+w+. 'i�f. ,t �^ f � �.�°.,�:"} Y' t �uI.Y +t�:a}f�:l�1�.5. ,4 ,'.Y. ./'-.S' ti q, �;:N;7_i f��• .��l 1T �,�� r f' f{� j.f41�.?.;\ }�` :1�." �,r. ^" < , ,}s lZ "y {; ^fir,. rl( 1� IBM Now am fit flat w 1. Plow r r VILLA WARNER SIGNS Reading, Reading, f Side 1 Lgn Size Side 2 41x6' Now selling one and Model parking on 1 two bedroom villas Edwards 2 4 'x6' I1ow selling one and Model parking on two bedroom villas Edwards 3 4 'x8 ' Now selling one and two Ni bedroom villas. Private 7 Iiuntington Beach community 848 4772 4 4 'x6' Model parking (with Now and sellintwodroomg ne villa) directional arrow) 5 3 'x5' Model parking (With Model parking (with directional arrow) directional arrow) 4 'x6' Now selling one and Model parking (with two bedroom villas • 6 directional LsTow) 7 Miscellaneous flags and banners Ss � ° - `f SEABORG, INCORPORATED 150 16168 Beach Blvd. , j Huntington Beach, CA 92647 848 0020 -,me..µ . a.• .., ......... ..._. ._._. ....... ... .. .. ... glu _ 4 N0710E OF PUBLIC HEARING' 1 NOTICE OF PUBIEARING APPEAL To PLANNING COMMISSIOr. APPEAL TO PLANNh .OmMISSION'S CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 00.4 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 60 4 ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington(leach,in the by the City Council of the city of Huntington Bmarh,in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center,Huntington Beach,at the Council Chamber of the Civic Center,Huntington Beach,at the hour of 7:30 p.m..or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday of 7.30 p.m.,or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 21st day of July.1980 for the purpose of considering an the 21st day of July.1980 for the purpose a considering an ' ` appeal to the June 17.1980 action of the Planning Commlolon appeal to the June 17.1960 action of site Planning Commission ; permitting 100 square feet of sign area in lieu of tits requested pamittim,100 squarn feet of sign area in lieu of the requasrad six I6)tree standing signs,flags and banners an progeny located 16)free-standing signs,flags and banners on property located at the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Edwards Street In at the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Edwards Street In the R3 Medium High Density Residential Distrt:;znd R2 Medium the R3 Medium High Density Residential District and R2 Mrd(unt i Density Retidential District. Density Residential District. i A legal description is on film In the Dr urtment of Development A legal description Is on file ir.'hs Department of Development Services. Services. I All Interested persons are Invited to attend said hearing in and All interested persons err Invited ss attend said hooting erxf i express their opinions for or against said appeal. expr*n their opin!ons for or mgat said appeal. I Further Informationrosy be obtained from the Office of the Further Information may be obtained from the Off Ica of the 1 City Clerk,2000 Main Street.Huntington Beach,California. City Clark,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California. 92648(7141 63"227. 026481714)636.5227. 4 Dated: July 7.1980 Dated: July 7.1080 t CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY OF 1UNTINGTON BEACH By: ALICIA M.WENTWORTH BY: ALICIA M.WENTWORTH City Clark City Clerk = I Pub.July 10,1080 Pub.July 10.1900 Hunt.Bash Ind. Hunt.Beach Ind. • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTiCC OF PUBLIC IICARINfi APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPEAL TO PLANNING':OMMISSION'S CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 80.4 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 80.4 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hating will be field NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hewing will he hnld by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,In the by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center,Huntington Beach,at the Council Chamber of We Civic Center,Huntington Beach,at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday hour of 7:30 p.m.,or as soon thoreafter as possible on Monday the 21st day of July,1980 for the purport of considering an the 21st day of July.1980 for the pt,rposs of considering an appeal to the June 17.1980 action of the Planning Commission Appal to the June 17,1980 action of the Planning Commission permitting 100 square fast of sign area in lieu of the requested permitting 100 square feet of sign area In lieu of the requested six(61 Gee-standing sans,flags and banners on ptuperty located six(6)free-standing signs,flaps and banners on property located at tits southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Edwards Street In at the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Edwards Street In the R3 Medium High Density Residential District and R2 Medium the R3 Medium High Density Residential District still R2 Medium Density Residential District. Density Residential District. I A legal description is on file in the Department of Development A legal desaiption Is on file in tits Department of Davniopment Services. Services. All interested persons arm Invited to attend said hearing and All Internted persons are invited to attend said hearing and f express their opinions for or against said appeal. express their opinions for or against sold appeal. Further nformation maybe obtained from the Office of the Further information may be obtained from the Office of the 1 City Cie Ir,2000 Main Street,Iuntington Beach.California. City Clerk.2000 Main Streit,Huntington Beach,California. 92643(714)630-5227. 926M(714)536.5227. , Dated: July 7,1980 Dated: July 7,1980 CITY OF NUNTINGTON BEACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: ALICIA M.WENTWORTH By: ALICIA?' WENTWORTH City Clerk City Clerk • I Pub.July 10,1080 Pub.July 10.1980 Hunt.Beach Ind. Hunt.Beach Ind. i Publish July 10, 1980 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 80-4 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 21st day of _Jules 1980 . for the purpose of considering an appeal to the June 17, 1980 action of the Planning Commission permitting 100 square feet of sign area in lieu of the requested six (6) free-standing signs, flags and banners on property located at the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Edwards Street in the R3 Medium High Density Residential District and R2 Medium Density Residential District. A legal description is on file in:the Department of Development Services. i All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal , Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED July 7, 1980 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH + By. City iClerk M. Wentworth I 1 T_ Publish NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Ginter, 7% p•M• or as soon thereafter as Huntington Beach, at the hour of • possible on the �S - day of � __.. lg • for the purpose of considering o,v a to` ..a.L l I I, Ckt4 ' -t,. -Li4.a. (.c .,,�, �- 'a'`lc CG) ' +r►.G"°'�s'' sa�� 4. �,�,. �3 �.. �{ ,fit.. ,"°„-.� (�,�r�•�.�� f�14r L', Gam'- {/`,�'�"'�V'Y� i+. 1� 4V► �++ T�L. �. . I � i lrl�.%AAA�0, All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their I opinions for or against said Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 8y: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk i --- ----- - - - - f n+7t1►. Superior Court l OF ft116 STATFOF CAI AFORNIA In Rnd fir thr 1'+101ni of Otancr { CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH&LANNING Public Hearing 80-4 t�taenolt � iart+cittat�llnno 41Rtr+f l'.0+fnrniR i �� $ 1'uunir ul Ilran+.e l�"'' Rita J. Richter Th,sl I ism And al all t1fr^hprrin mrwillned ass R riti►en lit the ih+tt I ~wii� am ma a puny tit.,nut intrevole l in the shove entitled matter; ! stsaMllr fh••t I Rm the prinritwtl rle►i of the printer of lisp Huntington Beach Independent Reviewbeat *$do a nrwsisaper of Fenrcai rirculAtiun.p:lhlistsed in i he t'ity nl i � t� k Ilk 04 Huntington Beach tip 0woli.•+sf Orange and whirh n#*VPApet ist published for the divitimit inn of local naps and intellionev of a oneral chase. ter.and whirh ne+mpaprc Rt Al Blocs hprrin mpnli:snrd had '�p�i�t,0,�#y�atWral and•till has a h+sna fide rrsh•rripikin list of payintt suhsrrib►rs, and whirh r.-*v spec has teen established.printed and put• t stiE li•hetl at rectdsr intervals In the said f sstsnly of(ranee fir it Iw►i:wi esrredins line year, lhRl the entire, lit which the tMtseiafi �! annexed is a prinlad t+K+y.Is"[.ten published in the rntular and rmlip wsur sit swid lim"satser,and n:st in any supplement {ILL 1�1(1Mre at1#t# lbrce+:f,tin the Whysaing,,dstex,to wit; lay 22t 1980 1 rrrtify inr declArvi under penny of petf stry that the(melt++, itte is tnw And lYlrrert. 22nd May aO t'aliftx 0, . ss, day .. Ole- Knsturr et+«Awl W 01ft s i NOTICE TO CLZRX TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITt!M`_.�,�.. ..,ram"i"VILA i NO D2�- TO: CITY CLBAK'S' CWFICE DATE: LA L%j l►;P1111 I O"MING T" ATTACMD LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE PLEASE SMMDU!�. _PAT OIP •' ' Zil�lteelix�i .r � �'�•,, ,•rri� .+.w.�..• y * Appeal • � t Other Adoption .. Bev ronmental Status (x) ?'�* YES No Refer to � •� � Planning Dwpartment - Mansion for additional irforaration. * if please transmit exact.wrording to be required in the legal . r, 00 IF. ar �r�.� �.Jr � d�- .��e• ; Irl �•+ is ' -t- ... ,�,.�,ILA �cl f 1 932_240-08 932-240-20 Michael G Ins)m Mayne Y Varasse 602-D Sun I)rive Spacial Sign P=dt 00-4 16921--D Corl Circle lhmtingtoan IIaach, Calif kby 14, 1980 (JH) HmUMt n L 3r.2i, Calif 92647 92647 932-240-09 932-240-10 932-240-21 Hitch A Cottrell. ON" J Crudm John A klwterlurxl 16951--A Oad Circle 345 2 Grandview Avenue 16931-A Cod Circle ltuntingban Beach, Calif S18=3 Ma3ce, Ca I Rmtington Baac*, Calif 92647 91024 92647 932-240-10 932-240-22 I*n' J cremi.ns Anth=W R OwAi I ton Hichmal J Milkier 345 8 crardview Avenue 169S1.-C tbd Circle 16931-B Ood Circle Siam Madre, Cali trg P"di, Calif Ihrrttjrrslkxai FAmah, Calif 91024 92617 92647 932-240-11 932•-240-12 932-240-23 Anthony R Iim iil.t on %ronir. >K fie► Howard Graybeld 16951-C Cod Circle '169 1-A Cod Circle &051 Doyle Derive limtiMbon Bunch, Ca1.3f Ewtis 9 t Beedl, Calif tAmUngtion Beach, Cn1if 92647 W647 92647 932-240-12 932-240-15 932-240-24 Omard 8eligum 'Amv J mLt;h W.ZXM Glick 16951-D Cod Circle 2U66 Pa dmod Street 16931-D Cad Circle 4 lhxltirxjton Peach, CLUX 81 2ro, Calif HuntUxIton bench, Cali ; 92647 92630 92647 932-240-13 932-240,-16 165-042-12 Virginia M Wa"m text li Jam" John C. Nielsen 105971 A trod cycle 7021 Himad ftive 6581 Dahm Circle lhuntixxjton Bede calif axangton Bssh, Com Huntington Heach iCA 92647 92647 92647 932-240-14 932-240-17 Salvatore J Bernardino cart a1 UCURL & F DahImn ; 16971-B Ood dry 16921-A Cod Circle lhuit•ingbm Beams, Calif Hetntingtm Ftawh, Calif I 92647 9264" 9J2-240-15 932-240-18 ,oumy J Mdth Pataridc L Britt: , 22266 Pur-kwood Start 16921-D Ood'Circle r l ZhrD, Calif SmUj Ig i - ENKIch, Cali 92630 92647 932-240-09 932-24C-19 Mitch A Cbttxell Charles R Fiachmr 16951-A Clod Circle 17292 Ctyapparal Lana f Ikrntirxltxm &oach, Chl1f Ihmbkxjt m Beach, Catlif 92647 92649 I i4 f � I fril Bret Southern carp 165-042-05 P.O. Box 2178 Ernest M Pettit � Nut:ingbw Beach, Calif special Sign Permit 80-4 6562 WrWield Drive MA7 Hie► 130 1980 W) Mice Huntington Beach, Calif i 92647 ' t.,c�zy, Inoorpormt:ad a,65-O/I-09 165-042-06 �16168 Beach Blvd. Id ldtxd H4 Miller Rich&W C Sclrvem ! :3uite 150 041 old Drive 6552 WbutfidW Drive i kaitington Beach, Calif 92647 mx*Ingt= Beach,, Calif Huntington Ham, calif • 92647 92647 1165-041-02 W-M-10 ' 165-,G42-07 ;4 V i►= l.fin Pot:" 11 roNadict Jerry N Smith 3IiDtxt Q H�eatilapedc 4' L R+1d Drive 6S32 wield•Drive Y.O. 8= 549 Ili, CAI i.! Hlmtimbm Budit Calif U)3 Gatxet, Gf].if 9" 0 92647 165-041-03 ` i6rS+�iMl-.?.Z 165-0i2-08 ►Iilliaia H Q= Jr Pod D loop" Huaild J Fam 6611 K-enfield Drive GM WaGMAW Derive 6511 DO= Circle ll4-ntirgt m Basch$ Celif Imaitr9 1 "D such, C" HHuntLvibm Deocho Calif 92647 U"7 92647 1b5•-041-O4 M-M-12 165-042-09 ikwaw t7eaoan 5l+ol" 0 AN.lri AW Killl M R Riraiart 6601 wrertiold Orb% GM ftwe ow Derive 65U Dobtn Circle lkint:ington &mcht Cal i NZAiDA / 0 Hmut9ton Beach, Cal I 92647 92W7 92647 lV5-�}41-05 lfwi-iM2-01 165-042-10 Jac.'c R Hall. H?elrr G JD,'Liaw 65Q1 Wwfield Derive M2 Urusftald Drive 6561 Ddwn Circle w llunti rgwn Beath# M14 1 Iftl3p Beach, C414 H mtbgtm BaKfI, Calm 92647 92647 92647 165-041-06 165-042-Q 165-042-U � Wn Ping O wd RLUJAU Hi mats tndlip 042 Chance Cix�rla 6602 WbwJiaald Drive 65 Dothm Circle l.�ti xpm Basch, calif rHtuaw,g h a- Ham, Calif 9264H�tti ngim aw d1, Cali 92646 165-041-07 165-142-03 L0%-HwxQ Jack J W.'1x At z 165-042-12 321 E 2nd St., Fos:. 605 6592 Wreafiald Drive Joh, C Nielam 4 Ica Rn7el w, Calif 940dwton 36wh, Cif 65U Dohm Circlii 90012 92647 92647 MtizVt= Deadho Catlif 165-041-00 165-442-i?d 165�042-13 Leslie D Frey � U B rr wn .r at at Barry6551 Wrentiald Hie Dews 6572 tltiwYAA d Drive Barr L Bu valeCiYC .a A mti nw= Beach l call# lkx* ti min JHseK.�c�, f�e�llf 92647 92647 9264HHu tnn Brode, CAI i AM I 1 I J 165-121--12 lay-u42-14 A1e�zo A Shoo�cex , ,; rye S11,9e1 Spex;ial 1 Permit 6t1'-4 V472 A Paul. Circle #j6t11 LA*am Circa May 13, 1980 (jH) Mike 26 ihmtingt m Bmcb, Calif 9 Beach, Calif � '92647 92647 165-043-01. 165-MI-21 165-M-13 John E trot in7wh4aV Oliver mmaka E FYaiilciin 17161 Kristaptmr Luo 66U 'old Drive 6452 St Paul Circle I tuniy ingb m Beach, Chtif 22"7 Bash, Cali'f Iiu Ungbcna Bowb, Calif 92647 92647 165--043-02 > laci Javw 3a;fi--1?1-14 man Chao 6+33�1 � Drive A Friedrich 17171 Kr3.sb*wr law a rld D Calif 7171 Stonswocd Drive mmtiis#m Bmwh, Calif 9264t1I�� 9264t1unt7�gbon Boesch, Calif 92647 165- ^43-03 Ol 165-121--15 Itimstd Mwudd City of 1lbntingtxra Baaah Peter Worth j 17191 Krist ophew Lena 6432 St r-ma CizU- s #A Ihmtington Beads, C %W Hmtingt on Beach, Call 92647 92647 ; 165-051-02 lfir21-1 -01 16 -2�t1i�+ Warner Avm%m W. St Goomus oxv% iruz PLAW 41 oup 270 tx Sett3 S m�w 6471 Maedow c3jwt Drive 144 S Bedfio l Drive 0=ns Dal liar, Calif Vntbg'ton Beach, C ILUf t�ev+�riy hills, Calif 90212 92M 165-051-17 165-121-07 165-121-23 Richard H TWa 07 Wreafield !rive 64S't�Rau1�Circle 6451 Mmdow Cat Drive I IImt3.ngbon Brach,- Call.! Hwtington Beach, Coilif g m�� fir Calif � � 1 92647 92647 165-051-18 165-M-00 165"M-24 ftold W FeW 9ho m L Galvin 2zmz J i 6661 htmifield Drive 644.1. St Aud Circle ``�'u Meadow (vest Drive ! I hmtingt M DODCh, Calif HmtL=rt 1 bmah # CaC-U Beah, CKW 92647 92047 92647 165-051-19 165-121-09 165-121-25 t a ► C Cllsoa Jr R LirmIn Qmy4m df 9arlss J Gla►bmdcz 6651 Wrenfield Drive 6451 St Paul circle 64U Hew Cyst Drive liwitingtoa Bwch, mlif bmtingfa fib, Cb3.i f umtirgb m Dosch, C114 92647 92647 92647 ,I 16I�:U l Crouch -01 Xr Douglas A �1im i awder 6641 Wrenf*ld Drink 54 � Paul circle Apt A 171U a aar s Stet 9n4 �, C�sll i.!! amtlw4t m &mch, Calif �264� Bub` Cellf 92647 � } 165-M-02 146-581-01 IYAel 17121 Rb a�Street � 3�66 Sar�Dtirive Suite 201 ltuntimiton Bed, Calif Aaaait 80•-4 �"�rt Beach, Calif 92647 92660 165-122-03 16'r1Z2-11 14 6-171-2 6 John Boyajian La#sd 8 Au a raon Warner Went 17131 Fj&mr& 8 1'71N Rnglapgod Circle �Tohnotown Properties 92647gtan Bm;&, C�14 92&l , Cali.£ 333 Hegenborger Rd Oakland, Calif 94621 165--122-U4 Major G W OW � 932-24Q M Jones onea 17141 abauds street 17172 14pglaaood Circle 6662-A Sun Drive !ltantington Bwd1' C&W -f>a- • C�.li£ Huntington Beach, Calif 4 92647 92647 165-122-05 �f,: .-132-1.? 932-240-02 Pow S E1mmm �? ',lq IjIwd;Am Ioan= H Yeoger 17151. Mon-+ . Str+®et Circle 4253 Mmmood Avenue 92647 t.ington 8�1, C*tlif 4� tom, Omttf Seal Deacb, Calif 90740 165-122-06 165-222.14 932-240-03 Earl G Paguee John ® staniguiczamdmrs A IGax`ttu 17161 »rd Street 171r.2 aNg,qaood Iom tluntirjtmi Desch, Calif o �� 6662 Sun Drive nti:V ar. Beacia, Calif 92647 165--122-7 145-122-15 •932-240-N 177171 � Street 1U4 Circle fte*Mle Aetioe ' i 6662-D Sn Drivettuntirrtn , Calif � , COM ax*Jj gtnn Bch Calif 92647 92647 ! 165-122-08h 165-122-16 932-240-05 Merles R Hughes FCmRM L Nm4m Dale Stanl.W 17191 Wwards Atreat 17132 Emglamrood Circle b672-�A � Dive IMntbxftoa Deac:h, Calif iRx* pgt cu �, Cal I 6672-A Sun >�, �g 92647 92647 lbmtir9264�I 165-122-09 165--122 35 g3,7-240-06 William G Nadkia» Aonald P Wagner ' 17202 l xds Sbr tt 6432 MuNdamc Crest Drrive, Lewis Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 Htnt3agGoa , Calif b667:-D Svn Drive amti antington Borah, Cali92647 f 92647 I 165--122-10 165-122--26 Jdm R Sdmurer L 932-20-07 17202 MglwomjfjAm 6442 medor Cms Dcivd Dwmix M d 4222 &i.lI irmn Drive 1lunt ingbon beach, CalifR MU09t an pe,� Cal I a tm Bea c h, Calif �z64i 92647 ' 92649 1 i OFFICE OF THE C17Y CLERK 2000 Mein Street Huntington teach, Catifrimia 9264E t i 1 i i r A yr. _ ati i .. . � NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL 70 PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONDITInNAL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 80.4 NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach•in the Council Chambe•of the Civic Center,Huntington Beach,at tho hour of 7:30 p.m.,or as soon thereaftor as possible on Monday the 21st day of July,1900 for the purpose of considering an r appeal to the Juno 17.1980 action of the Planning Commission permitting 100 square lest of sign area in lieu of the requested six(G)free-standing signs,Ilags and banners on Property located at the suutheast corner of Warner avenue and Edwards Street in the:Y3 Medium High Density Res'dential District and R2 Medium Density Residential District. A legal des7iption is on file in the Department of Development Services. All interested person-are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal. i Further Inforttsstion may he obtained from the Office of the City Clark,7000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California. 92643(714)536.5227. Dated: July 7,1980 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: ALICIA M.WENTWORTH City Clerk Pub.July 10.1980 Hurt„E4ach Ind. �I\ r a; orb t k�i }t. •+ >_`` �1e" #CIL `• j I+ r •IL • , a firIft ," ' � r �Nl I i I �I • _ /�1 �/•/'� DUI IN THF. fJl P Superior Court � 3j:iij � • oF�ltt: Y C11'y COU STATE:OF CAI.IFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH+ CITY CLERK Public Hearing 80-2 Stnte of California 1 ANAPMALTOM ('fimity of Orange 1"a. ���' �����• t#P>i�dl.�I W1'tCi2lC M•! itit}=u KM=r otv>cll led. go City Rita J. Richter C" by ►: b Nr llwtetta C" debt Chia Ctror. That I am and at all tirnrR herein mrrdifinrd wu%n citirrn of !!!.M �> �r the IJnitrd titate•t,river the age of twenty-fine 5eAtr,and that I r,tlrr fLf d 1+Gp cpfgi goti am not a party tn,nor interested in the abovir entitlt•d rnnttr r; rtW rMfize of girl Ito that I am the principal r!rrk of the n►inter of the tCW a�yy�,h tom,�p?��r•owR a Huntington beach Independent Review rw a l�a tr rt.��� ' Itet.+ J NW a ra exh L ue: �1:mw* 4�p lrerHtl�+lla t71d 1/eeii ti1AYpe'� a newx+aper of grnrr�l circulation, nthlished in the City of �eheporrtt tse at lb soots restav d $'aa++i*i%y1i�.rtr fark'*Alkl � Huntington Beach ,li�as(bs1+e tk;.,.,r pJA A Jape l i krdale autnoili rtieWat! county of Orrtnge and r•+hich newspaper is published for the "SNOW �•r.r:}.;. diseminalion of local news and intelligenty of a general charac- �y ktrrwtad :e lavbM M; ter,and which newmpsprr at all limes herein mentioned had •�urtatirslas ��t.� w•I end still has n INma ride sul+scription list of paying,sulstcribers. Peaaltltwt x % . and which news a r has been mtahlished. printed and uh• 1w�+War�&W ems'�aAak'"ll p W p 6m tk ahtt Te for ab Glork.am,$ lished at regular intervnlA in the said Ctnmty of Orange fotr a WM��t,.Adi1�,�(�..,,��,lamb,ttl "i period escerding rune year; thet the notice, of which the tt6W, (fill .Y.ti 7.;•',• annei d is a printer' copy.hm been publishrd in the rrR,dnr M7Rp>oWi ifRO ` and entire isttue of mid newsp•(rrr,rind not in any supplement g�.Ug�. iiAtNAMoR7�i. ther;Kof,tin the following date,,to wit: 'MY. Ard. :•. t , �n 1fr• IVA o I... . May 8, 1990 I rertif•for de-lAre)under +rnnity of n•r•un•that the fore o• > 1 1 J R ing is true and correct. I)atecial. . .....Garden.,Grove................. Caiif rnia,thyr,,G.-�...�•ht Y ,/.. ... t Signaturr 1 1 i t ram No W-#319 • �•�� City of Huntington beach e c 4 P.O. fox too CALIFORNIA wa �i OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK May 20, 19W i i I W. Holewt Hofer f { 7561 Center Drive i Huntington fleache CA 92647 The City Coumil of the City :,f Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, MY 19, 1980. overruled the deci;fon of the PI nning Conmfssion and approved Special Sign Permit No. 60-2. Please contact the Department of Development Services for further informtion. AUCIII M. IIEMT1iWNTH, CITY CUM i Sy: 1 AFW:cb i 1 erc. l� cc: Department of Developa*nt Services i i •rt ,e,. . re. ................... _ . . .... ...... ..._.. ..._. -. ....�.....-.+..+�. .:.fir...;rr: i REQUEST FOR CITY COfJNCIL ACTION Jmrr_s W. Palin Development Services Submitted by Department Date Prepared May 19, 19 80 Backup Materiel Attached FX Yet a No Subject APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 80-2 LOCATED NORTH OF CENTER DRIVE AND EAST OF GOTHARD ST. City Administrator's Comm•pnts Approve as recommended. v 1 Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: �y STATEMENT OF ISSUE: i Transmitted for consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commission' s denial of Special Sign Permit No. 80.-2, a request to attach a 2' x 7' sign on an existing 65' high pole sign within the Forth Huntington ` Center Specific Plan. ' RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and the Planning Staff recommend that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit. I No. 80-2. It is also recommended that the Council adopt the findings f as imposed by the Planning Commission on April 15, 1980. ANALYSTS: Appellant: Helmut Hofer 7561 Center Dr. Huntington Beach, Calif. Appligast-: Helmut Hofer 7561 Center Dr. ; Huntington Beach, Calif. 'c t' ' Location: East side of Gothard St. , north of Center Dr. F.M- 1 est.: To permit the installation of a 21 % 71 double faced sign on an existing 651 high pole sign. no Wa - T Page Two PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY PORTER, SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 80-2 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE; AYES: Winchell, Porter, Kenefick, Bazil, Greer NOES: None ABSENT: Shea, Hauer ABSTAIN: None DT.SCUSSION• Special Sign Permit No. 80-2 is a request to attach a 20 x 71 double-faced internally illuminated sign to an existing 65 ft. high, 200 sq. ft. pole sign. The proposed 14 sq. f-. sign will identify the motel located within old World Village. The existing pole sign, which identifies old World was approved by the Planning Commission on August 7, 1979 by Special Sign Permit No. 79-2. Analysis of the site indicates that the proposed sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area, nor will tho proposed sign be detri- mental to property located in the vicinity of the proposed sign„ The sign will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular vision because of the .location of the existing pole sign approximately 85 ft. east of Gothard Street and 290 ft. north of Center Drive. However, the freestanding sign identifying told World serves fifty five businesses in the shopping comple:t. and waF approved by the Planning Commission primarily because of substantial economic hardships suffered by the shopping center and because of exceptional and extraordinary c,i.rcum- stat,ces that apply to the entire site. The Co=iissian and staff feel that approval of the motel sign may set a precedent which is incompatible with the objectives set fortis in the Planned Sign Program for Old World Village (F)SP No. 77...3) and furthermore, staff analysis indicates that the proposed sign would not be legible by vehicles traveling north or south on the 405 Freeway. The proposed sign is two feet high, and the lettering is approximately 16 inches, whereas the smallest lettering on the existing Old World sign is approximately 28 inches high. Because of this, the Motel stkin would only be readable by vehicles traveling on Gothard Street, Center Drive and McFadden Avenue, but would not be legible from the San Diego Freeway. Therefore, staff concurs that placement of the proposed sign on the existing 65 ft. high po a sign would not benefit the applicant and would not meet the intent of the Planned Sign Program for the site. It is also the opinion of Staff that the addition of the motel sign will add to the clutter and confusion that appears when too many signs are erected in the same genera' area. Presently, there are four major identification signs in the vicinity of Old World Village that. are visible from the Diego Freeway and surrounding areas. These signs include: Levitz; eurniture, Peterson Trucking, Chevron and the Old World Village sign. Also, Avis Truck Rental is planning to install if 1 1 , Page Three a 38 £t. high freestanding nig n adjacent_ to the San Diego Freeway. The Avis :;ign will raise the total numberof' major identification signs to rive (5) within a relatively small geographical area of the City. If the trend toward large identification signs continues in this area, visual blight will affect the appearance of the community. FINDINGS FOR DEH AI,: 1.. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the other tenants in the shopping center. 2. The granting of this request will constitute the granting of a spec:.al privilege for the motel operator that would not be generally realized by other merchants of Old World. FUNDING SOURCE: i Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reverse the Planning Cotcuiiissi.on's action and approve Special Sign Permit No. 80•-2. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Strict compliance with Article 976 will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. 2. The proposed 6ign would not adversely affect other signs in the area. 3. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of ,such sign. 9. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. i SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Letter of Appeal 2. Area Map 3. Site Plan and Sign Elevation 9. Staff Report: Respectfully submitted, J mes W. $alin, Directoi- Department of Development Services JWP:,SMS:g c April 23, 1980 i City Council of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 l Honorable Members of the Council, i In petitioning the Council for a Special Sign Permit. I would like to address myself to the staff report, pertinent to my request, dated April 15, 1.980. My situation does satisfy all 4 conditions in Section 3.0 of the Staff Report. I am presently suffering economic hard- ship in spite of the fact that the "Old World" sign has been up ti for a number of months now. This is due to the fact that identification of "shopping" and "dining" does not give anyone a clue that lodging is also available. Numerous visitors to the village have expressed surprise that there is a motel there, and had they known of it, they would have stayed there instead ' of finding a room in Westminster or further south in Huntington Beach. I . The fact that "hotel" is not mentioned on the big sign has been acknowledged as an error within the village. An over- whelming majority of merchants within the center has indicated by petition that it is in favor of the proposed addition. Granting this sign permit does not give me a special privilege, but it does bring my business into parity with other businesses in our center by giving it the identification they already enjoy. I'm not concerned with visibility from the free- way. I simply ask that you allow me to put some identification �. on an existing sign, which does not contribute to the clutter of signs in our geographical. area, so I have some exposure, at least, to surface street traffic in the immediate vicinity. In this way my business may prosper, generating revenue for the city and more business for Old World merchants. I feel that my request is reasonable and should be granted on the basis of need and a sense of f:.:irness. Respectfully yours , Helmut Hofer �Z i ...■.... R41- lliiilf• I j nr. I a ..�rv...�r �� •t�.._.h ' c t z ... 00 ` at"; MTN { — IL I t c L 3 � r 1 t i o y ^t•:,•1.1.1 a r tt 1 J Z f f iiUM17MGTON BEACH PLMKIMC OEPT. Tom MACK r � co Vjj jj gyp, »a � =.1 < <. Is""`xr'�,..) 1,i , `• ., ;J..u:._�� �� . � �� �.1 �, A is •-�" - � ' ��1 � , c�s�---I , �1 ��� or = O all I vl• • l V � ��Ld ,�` i �' 1 i Cr) f• -r• 1 ' O ,I or Cal t A � huntington beach development services department STAFF .REPOR-rr.. . .r TOt Planning Commission FROM: Development Servi^es DATE: April 15, 1980 SPECIAG SIGN PER14IT NO. 80-2 DATE ACCEPTED: i AyPlic-ant: Helmut Hofer. March 19, 1980 7561 Center Drive Huntington Beach, Ca. MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: May 16, 1980 Request: To permit the installation of a 2O11ING• North Huntington double face 2' x 7' Sign on an Center Specific Plan existing 65 ' high pole sign. Location: Subject property is located on GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: the north side of Center Ave. , General Commercial between Gothard and Beach Blvd. (7561 Center Dr . ) ACREAGE: 4.21 EXTSTING USE: Old World Village 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Based on the finding as outlined in Section 7.0 of this report, the staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. RO-2. 1 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit No. 80-2 is a request by the applicant to add a 21 x 7' internally illuminated sign to an existing pole sign which is 65, high and 200 sq. ft. in size. The proposed 14 sq. ft. siren will identify the motel located within the Old Word Shoppinq Villaae.. The existing pole sign, which identifies old World, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 7, 1979, by Special Sign Permit No. 79-41.. The site is within the North Huntington Center Specific Plan, Site No. 2 and the sign regulations state "all signs shall conform to Article 976 of the Huntington reach Ordinance Code, however, free- standing :signs shall be limited in the number permitted as designated n "he Specific Plan map. No other freestanding signs shall be permitted." I A•f►43A ------ -- -- - - _. _ .-�_ - it SSP 80-2 Page Two The Specific Plan (PSP 77--3) indicates the location of two freestanding signs for Site Two of the Specific Plan bap. These locations are at the southeast corner and southwest corner of the site adjacent to Center Drive. Signs identifying Old World have been constructed at these locations. 3,Q SUMMhRY OF ISSUES: ! i In accordance with Section 9760. 44 of the ordinance code, the Commission may grant a special sign permit providing for relief from the strict application of the provisions of the ordinance code subject to a finding that the following conditions exist: a. Strict compliance with the sign code will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant, and b. The proposes; sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area, and i c. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such signs, and d. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian and vehicular traffic vision. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: '• � ;.F On-premise signs ara categorically exempt from CEQA requirements (Section 15111, Class 11, State EIR Guidelines) . 5.0 .SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING, AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The site is zoned North Huntington Center Specific Plan, Site Two and is designated on the General Plan as General Commercial. The site is :'1 currently developed commercial and is the site of Old World Village. ` The property to the south is zoned C--2 (Community Business District) and is designated on the General Plan as General Commercial and is the site of Huntington Center. Property abutting the subject site on the west is the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of--way and is zoned M1 (Light Manufacturing District.) . This property is designated on the General Plan as General Coir!�ercial. The property to the north and east of the subject site is zoned North Huntington Center Specific Plan and is designated on the General Plan as General Commercial. The property to the east is currently vacant and the property to the north of the subject site is developed with an apartment complex. 6.0 ANALYSIS• The proposed 1.4 sq. ft. sign measures 2' x 71 and will be mounted on the existing Old World freestanding sign. The existing pole sign is 65 ft. high, 200 sq. ft. in sign area and was approved by the Planning Commission on August 7, 1979 based on findings of economic hardship and exceptional circumstances of the site. It is the applicant's ' request to add a sign identifying the motel that is located within r the Old world Shopping Center Complex. I it 1 SSP 80-2 /Page Three Analysis of the site indicates that the proposed sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area, r.or will the proposed sign be detrimental to property located in the vicinity of the proposed sign. The sign Will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular vision because of the location of the existing pole sign approximately 85 ft. east of Gothard Street and 290 ft. north of Center Drive. However, the freestanding sign identifying Old World serves fifty five businesses in the shopping complex, and was approved by the Planning Commission primarily because of substantial economic hardships by the shopping center and because of exceptional and extraordinary circumstances that apply to the entire site. Staff feels that approval of the motel sign may set a precedent which i is incompatible with the objectives set forth in the Planned Sign Program i for Old World Village (PSP No. 77--3) and furthermore, staff analysis ; . indicates that the proposed sign would not be legible by vehicles traveling north or south on the 405 Freeway. The proposed sign is two :feet high, and the lettering is approximately 16 inches, whereas the smallest lettering on the existing Old World sign is approximately 28 inches high. Because of this, the Motel sign would only be readable by vehicles traveling on Gothard Street, Center Drive and McFadden Avenue, but would not be legible from the San Diego Freeway. Therefore, staff r''�nncurs that placement of the proposed sign on the existing 65 ft. high Ole sign would not benefit the applicant and would not meet the intent of the Planned Sign Program for the site. It is also the opinion of Staff that the addition of the motel sign will add to the clutter and confusion that appears when too many signs are erected in the same general area. Presently, there are four major is identification signs in the vicinity of Old World Village that are visible �. from the San Diego Freeway and surrounding areas. These signs include: r 1•evitz Furniture, Peterson Trucking, Chevron and the Old World Village sign. Also, Avis Truck Rental is planning to install a 38 ft. high freestanding sign adjacent to the San Diego Freeway. The Avis sign will raise the total number of major identification signs to five (5) within a relatively small geographical area of the City. If the trend toward large identification signs continues in this area, visual blight r' will affect the appearance of the community. 7.0 RECOI*IENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 80-2 based on the following findings: i FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. There is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that does i not apply generally to the other tenants in the shopping center. The granting of this request will constitute the granting of a special privilege for the motel operator that would not be generally realized ; by other merchants of Old World. 41t:gc ATTACI*IENTS: 1. Area Map 2. Site Plan 3. Sion Elevation 1 1 •. 1 I � 'IVf/ I 111 1••: • 1 �''�. 1 11-� � /�-„' / \ / I � ;�,/ .� :.f fblt•.• Ilta Ilnr >, 1 � :I 11 I �`, '•�.,'� �Y 1 . r• ti r� --r .•.✓ '/.......1 I•rr• rn I n� 1 Inr.r I 1 • J7 "I Its CO) 1 11 1 Jr' •� I.ull�t.j • ' _�� r—� L? mil'(.1•�, i f JJI� �Artll�/L••I.r11I {Y 1 C �� � 8 i;.1 � •� ''��1 lam(`; _•1 1.�f �, i 1 . .. ti a�u 1't�MPIT Mitt b/Mr!1� �tM�F 1�►FnA�'•',� /"� CASH RECEWT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH}, J� � r.o.sox��� •, MUNtINOtON AEACM,CAWpORn1A 97646 'fir 111l1i Kti. . �iIALL � -stat fin 75stIv jT L i clTv TitiawN��-wA��iM s1'i PkTE DEPT.ISfU1N0 i t• ? 1 t1ECiiVItP� � 1•.•. . . ��' , ' I AD011ii1 tt,•.,j.,. •,t;' ::1,�: , •� •h• :ia�, ! I '1t 11iCi1 � 1,9 i ACCOUNT AMOUNT .t. TOTAL No. 5856 ISSUING DEPARTMENT i I J��..�. Publish May S. 1980 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING AN APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 80-2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council I I of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, i Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M, , or as soon thereafter as possible on day the 19th day of Mai+ 1980 , for the purpose of considerinn an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 80-2, a request to add a 12 ft. x 7 ft. internally illuminated sign to an existing 65 fto high free-standing Sign located in the Old World Village shopping mall at the northwest corner of Center Drive and Huntington Village Nay. The property is currently zoned North Huntington Center Specific Plan. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. j'. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said Special Sign Permit No. 80-2 Further infornwtion may be obtained from the Office of toe City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 9264E - (714) 536-5227 DATED-- Play 5, 19BO _ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk ' r1 NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMId TO: CITY CLSRK'S OFFICE DATE: N1Ily a2�8� FROM: i PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACN.ED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE Of DAY OF �► AP's are attached 4. AP's will follow No AP's Initiated hy: Planning Cr ission Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other r. Adoption of Environmental Status (x) 41 YES NO l Refer toi�tL- Yefy „+�.- Planning Department - Extension for additional information. * If appeals please transmit exact Wording to be xequiro:d in the legal. t y � i � i 11ul,i i:;hed j.rt II.13. 111(! -dent News April 3, 1980 ' ?,^Y,�i�irc xC'cRxB�tSCSQSK�itG�x LrGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SPL•'CIAL SIGN PLIU4111' NO. 80-2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that: a public hearing will be held by Lhe City Planning Commission of the City of Iluntiggton Be ch, California, for the purpose of considering Special Sign Permit No. 80-2, a request to add a 2 ft. x 7 ft. internally illuminated sign to an existing 65 ft. high free-standing sign located in the Old World Village shopping mall at the northwest corner of Center Drive and Huntington Village Way. The property is currently zoned nort Pluntington Center Specific Plan. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development i Services office. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P.M. , on April 15, 1980 , in the Council Chambers Building of the ,I it Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and i express their opinio»s for or against the proposed Special Sign Permit No. 80-2 . Further information may be obtained from the City r1anning Department. 'rejophone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 3rd day of. Api-i 1 , 1980 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James 11. Palin 1 By Secretary -`" 142-474-07 l�:Jitits Hofer Special Sign �iit 80-2 Kaye 7bhin i ibl Oenter Aveius,s !March 20, 1980 (a) Mike 16675 Algonquin 5trear 1hait 11witut 1, Calif Huntingbon 2Irh, Calif llb4� 92649 uld WUrld ik=ar masers Corp 142-071-59 142--474-05 '1561 Center Averaw Htlatir�gi�cn Center LearAxd V Wine nuntingt'on Beach, Calif 10100 Sautes !'ia dm Blvd. 7561 Center ]Dr #8 92b49 Suite 1900 amLi.ngto" Beach, C.31if um Anghles, CatU 90067 92647 141-47242 142-071-66 142-474-09 Vila" PIVOa:y Industrial Park Maryla blmwrc1 u-blvin-J Hoefflige r lAwit z Fu nit um Carp 7561 C antese Ave #9 13919 Struilsman Rand Attas David N Devins Flxrs Jngtm Baerh, Calif warrit:oa, Calif 90701 212 High Street 92647 142-472=02 puttsbum, pa 142-474-10 f Uld Warld Owners Aww 1%64 it dart H Iddir a 'fit: Oaaet S0008rLww 7561 Canter Ave #10 105 N Eastyrxd Avwxea 0 &IntbVt= Bowh, cmI l i ' rMleswood, Calif 90301 92647 142-472-04 142-474-01 142-474-U Dam eiadvf Franc a Turaw 7561 Ca►�ter D�rlve 1561 Olcter Ave #48 1373 N Killer Street Huntington BebOts, Calif Hunt.irgbm Bseach, Calif Anaheim,, Calif 92b47 92647 92806 142-342-05 142-474-02 142-474-12 Jatwel Imberpriaees JAef Uschof Hart W Wlsrnar 47777 (knter Drive 7561 Osat er Ave #48 7USI Clanger Ave #12 11untiatgton Bach, Calif Amtinom Ham, Cal # LUwingbon beach, Calif 92647 92"7 92647 I 142-071 58 142-474-04 142-474-13 t4mtqamrj Ward Day. Cbarp. C1mt er WIN Peter H Udkl Attu: R L Walker 7561 Clsntaaar Ave #4 7561 Contort .'l11e #13 2825 H 14th Street 92647 2H Wit. DAM Bedh a , Call amttimitan Beach, Calif t2& wAj Calif. 94616 05-474- 142-U7I,�Sd" 142 142^474-14 i t:it�y'6f llmtit Besah Nit�girtial L Lister Walfganq Ibbal. ./- 1200 R*J&nd Pd #5 .... .�.. Um uvwpt Haar:h, Calif. Ing S Ia , Ca AvAvenueor 9Z560 1 11 f 90302 142-071-54 142-474-06 142--474-15 Chc at sty 03110" Di t War= F C zarnetzki Agatha R Zxdmsan 2701 Fairview Yd 7561 Center Ave #CI 7561 Center give US (NAta HMO Calif Ikmting:Un Basch, Calf %mtillgton Deaseh, Cal I 92626 92647 92647 ath d V- f L42-474-16 142-474-33 1.ruvid Apodaca �, Renate Y Quigley f I'M Center Ave 116 SPeciaJ. Sjgt1 Pemi t 80-2 7561 Center Ave #33 i 11WILingtm lkach, Calif 14urah,M 1980 (ill) Mike ltmtirigtrn Beach, Calif I12647 92647 142-474-25 142-474-34 142-474-17 Axald K Phelps Walter Valtingojer • rlorian lbertner et aS 7561 -25 Center Ave Mbint Dzgm 'Inc 15b1 Cantor Ave #17 8250 Vickers St Suite 1 Ikultingtm Beach, Calif 92 Huntington4 Beach, Calif San bie4o, j1647 Calif 92111! 1,12-474-18 142-474•-26 142-474-35 i1 K tlatesole West Coast Some i ua Inc Pastry Ship 7561 Center Chive 6855 Warner Avenue 11�70 D� .".�� a Beech, C131 if l�tington Beads, Cal if 90808 92647 142-474-19 142-474-27 142-474-36 t 13 Janico Melvin Urml Peters m Manfred Egg nf 119 7561 Center Ave #27 7561 Center Dr #35 7561imnt Cuter Ave ngtan Dead), Calif limti.ngtm bear'h, Calif 11 ntingtcn , �g f 92647 92647 92647 142-474-28 142-474-20 �OS 142-474-37 Iaonard P Carter 1bD F Igpex Steven J C Franzen et el 21002 Pacific O.-vat 9igfaaay 7561 Clentw Ave #28 7561 Canter Ave 118 1luntingtcn Beach, Calif 93r�gtt.�n F�aarch, Calif Huntington2647 Heect�, Calii 92648 92642647 9x647 1-12-474-2.1 142-474-29 142-474-30 Aelxlrn U liatd ar Ed uLrd Kel.bsrborn ad le nrbacher et a1 ' i 75bl Canter Aw 121 660 The Village 7561 Center Ave #38 I lKintirgban beach, Calif AadarZb Beach, Calif MmU goon Beach, CRI J 97.647 90277 92647 � J "'-474-22 142-474-30 142-474-39 i.• %:.nd R RclAnson George Presalhler lkamit Gublenr 7�61 Centex Drive 122 7561 CEntarr Ave IKl 7561 Center Ava #39 Huntington 1aat , Calif amtbvgt n Basch, Calif 16ntington j3wwh, Cal 92u47 92647 92647 142-474-23 142-474-31 142-474-40 F rm ici Santos RiclaW P Lewin Jose Ince to 7bul Canter Ave #23 7561 Cantor Ave 131 7561 Center Ave 040 1 I un4 l tingb n Beach, Cal limtbx = Dewh, Calif 9tm4 Beach,ngtim Bea h, Calif f ( 142-474-211 142-474-32 142-474-41 J Alfred H Schroeder Ekwid Wfar Sman P.abic 7561 C)entur Avenue 124 7561 Center Ave 132 7561 Canter Ave 141 I tuntiurjtn Beach, Ca I J MmUngtDn beacli, Cal i.f Huntim tm Baac h e Calif 92647 92647 92647 let 3 � 1•12-474-42 Iri.la if CSestr Spp-W sigi Penrdt 80-2 Vild Owiter Ave W Muds .200 1980 011) Mike 41wit:ington Bw-ich, Calif 92647 142-474-43 FM Jacob Pete wi 610 So. Main Street 7561 Center Ave W-43 Los Angeles, Calif 90OR4 IluntingWi BWAM, Calif `J2647 142-474-44 So. Calif Easton Cn. I ixcedam tee toe Bins 19171 Meigna u Street 1561 Canter Drive f44 Hmtingtcn Beach, Cali ; lhattin tton Y-%chi, W J f 92646 91647 142-474•-45 DWt of tsUrWp= AtL n 1•1-win Narm"Ins 120 tb. Spring Street 7561 Canter Ave1Z/y�{�[ Ipa,/a�1+�v" es• Cali Beach,Huntington g 92647 Attn: Staff Assistant - B r L42-474-46 { llelnut Hafer motel 75bl W Canter 4r i46 1lwitingim Beach, Cali 92647 trt9xx i Ja�xtmf� IbtflotuIN vita uranw Cmmty Sanitation nistrict P.O. sox 0127 kbmtabi Valley, Calif 92700 f�oet AfVAPPEl.L QOTIC OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OFPUBLIC COMMISSION'S GDENIAL OF COMMISSIONS fJ�NIAL OF AN APPEAL TO THE PLANNING SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 80.2 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 80.2 :a `# NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,in held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Bssci%in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center,Huntington Beach, the Council Chamber o1 the Civic Cantor,Huntington Bach, t. at the hour of 7:30 p.m..or as soon thereafter as possibin on at the hour of 7:30 p.m..or as soon thereafter as possible an Monday the 19th day of May,1960,1_ •the purpose of con. Monday the 19th day of May,1980,for the purpose of con' sidsting an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of sidering an appal to the Planning commission's denial of Special Sign Psrmh No.80.2,a request to add a 2 ft.x 7 ft. Spscial Sign Permit No.80.2,a request to add a 2 ft.x 7 ft. internally illuminated sign to on existing 65 ft.high free- Internally illuminated sign to an existing 65 ft.high free- standing sign located in the Old World Village shopping malt standing sign located in the Old World Village shopping mall at the northwest corner of Center Drive and Huntington at the northwest corner of Center Drive and Huntington Village WsY.Ths property is currently zoned North Villaga Way. The property Is currently zoned North Huntington Center Specific Plan. Huntington Center Specific Plan. is A legal description Is an file in this Department of Development A legal dascription is on file in the Department of Development { Services Office, Services Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing end All intarestsd persons are invited to attend said hearing and ! exttresc their opinions for or against said Special Sign Permit express their opinions for or against said Special Sign Permit No.80.2. No.90.2. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the Further Information may be obtained from the Office of the city clerk.2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,CA.92648 City Clerk.20M Main Street,Huntington Beach,CA.92M 1714)53"227. (7141 636.5227. Dated:May S.1980 Dated: May 5,1980 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH '. BY:ALICIA M.WENTWORTH BY:ALICIA M.WENTWORTH City Clerk City Clerk Pub.6/8/80 Pub.51'8180 , Hunt.Bach Ind. Hunt.Beach Ind. i� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ri AN APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF AN APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF ' SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 80.2 SPECIAL SiGN PERMIT 80-2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be NOTICE 13 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be r .' held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Bach in hold by the City Council of the City of Huntington Bach,in the Council Cfumbar of the Civic Center,Huntington Beach, the CouWl Chamber of the Civic Center.Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,or as eaten thereafter as possible on at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,or as soon thereafter as possible on ; t, Monday the 19th day of May,1980,for the purpose of con- Monday the 19th day of May.1980,for the purpose of can. r= ° sidering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of sidering all appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No.80-2.a request to add a 2 ft.x 7 ft. Special Sign Permit No.80.2.a request to add a 2 ft x 7 ft. ` Internally illuminated sign to an existing 65 ft.high frae- internally Illuminated sign to an existing 65 ft.high free• i standing sign located in the Old World Village Shopping Mall standing sign located in the Old Word Villate Shopping Mall i at the northwest corner of Center Drive and Huntington at the northwest corner of Center Drive and Huntington Village Way.The property is currently zoned North Village Way. The property is currently zoned North Huntington Center Specific Plan. Huntington Center Specific Plan. A legal dazeription Is an file in the Department of Development A legal description Is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. Services Office. a, All interested persons are Invited to attend said hearing and All interasted persons are Invited to attend sskf hearing and express their opinions for or against Said Special Sign Permit express their-,pinions for or against said Special Sign Permit No.80-2. No.80.2. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk,2000 Mein Street,Huntington Bach.CA 92SU City Clerk,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,CA 02640 1714)536.5227. (7141 536.5227. Dated:May S.1980 Dated: May 5,19W CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By:ALICIA M.WENTWORTH By:ALICIA M.WENTWORTH City Clerk City Clak pub.5/9/80 Pub.5/8/80 Hunt.Bach Ind. Hunt.Basch Ind. it OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 2000 Main Street �.. Huntington Beach, California 92648 � s R !' {wJw�L9 .N LI4 .4w:HtiY. I: a.ark �rtr�r.IM.• {@aid r{.y r N.f ANK7'.�} I fA NOTICE Of:PUBLIC HEARING AN APPt,4L TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S UENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 80.2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,In the Council Chamber of the Civic Center,Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 19th day of May,1900,for the purpose of con• sidecing an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Squat Sign Permit No.80.2.a raqu►d to add a 2 ft.x 7 ft. internaliv illuminated sign to an existing 65 ft.high fr►►• standing sign located in the Old Wank!Village Shopping Mall of the northwest corner of Center Drive and Huntington Village Way.The property Is currently toned North Huntington Center Specific Plan. A legal description is on file in the Department of Davelopmrnt Services Office. All interested pawns are invited to attend raid hestin g and express their opinions for or against said Special Sign Permit No.00.2. Furti:er Information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,CA 92646 1714)53&5227. Elated:May 5,1980 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BY:ALICIA M.WENTWORTH City Clerk Pub.518/f0 Hunt.Beach Ind. --area nttTt^teri�+r s«'i:CCU�rera+.gin. a•t:a1. k1?N r/A:�1 ✓ ,'.�Y1wia!i ewf.� Ga i 1 I I • I' ! INVIF i i Superior Court (IFTllt: STATE:OF CALIFORNIA t In and for the!'aunty of Orange t i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH+ CITY CLERK PROOF OF PI1111.ICATION Public Hearing 79-5 t4iliN' N47FS.�?�;tfi, �. State ofcalifornia ► r4fICH HttkkBY vR(4=�'44•�:.•' County of Orangr I"- hrutrx teas-N bid by tits CStr�: �U of Ur CttW K H+�wil�ae Aodrh_. bs tb Cntr+xll lt..+bK of Q+s(S.ic 1�m•+, Rita J. Richter `W.H`4`�q'p'11+Id`'siti"Ia"lrett'°. �=i�i���.�N iwx a• I That I ntn xnd at all times herein mentioned was n ciiiren of Pw?� cwtullwlr�ws[a 1e• , mm the United titates,mer the age of twenty-tine yenrn,and that I `ol p . of ttrliat lebrwry b.t��I{pp s/!!K d+aieF of SFatis1� am not a party to,nor inirrested in the ahorr rntillcd matlrr; sip Penn. Na 79�5'b/edl N.r•c w; that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the raft MA is a M"M to Pon* art+j' VA'MkIftdk77.�Q AseMarc!i�'_ 'ld Huntington Beach Independent Review �±eaati[!1t yg • eltM �a;b innm►a►� ppsrn�nit,bMorvss,ttM Hettttsetw ihrdt• i a newspaper of genrrnl circulation.;nthli.hed in the Vity of Ordiesarr"R snood wr 111 its+•t rts:a�dga m t1w etu. f*K'�'d" � Huntington Beach rsipwo"64bow trt7 It 8W%WT I u.tr HvetfuVA liucb( diaaecv('alit:. • i "mi. �inub�*wtt ra+W wtt�to W. ,, County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the a,Y,yd w� vprwt earth d!A v-' diseminalinti of local news and intelligrrce of a general chatac• Aaa:u:. s metsb�ODft of I I ter, and which newspaper at all limes herein mentioned had r'tab�dg'm` 4, a t+het drnrtptlns b a Gfr ia-th4'j•, . and still has a lama fide subscription list of paying subecrilwm. rlhpertnwuutFkt+rbperwn►Eer+�r?s'?'ti and which newspaper has been rstablishrll,printed and pub- All i.t t"tsd prt�a.+v..irrit"O" !wttWd wd WoW red e ' r.ttetir* ,. lished at reotlat intemotls in the%aid County of(orange fnt a •t.,[.Ass Gar a t4tslatt seW t�pnecW Sr�t.�i perind exceeding one year; that the notice, of which tLr IrirtnaNu 79U `-'''`t` ` y�• annt'sed is a printed cttpy,has I"n publishnl in the regular F`u a lalur t or riV betitoianl' and entire issue of said netw pp fear the[>f y at the torch tr , M{rtr,and not in any supplement Main 13treet.Hneth�m FtesrA.Cetitd�Lw.' thereof,tin the fullowing dates,to wit sa92a16.,1"rl It r ti. °� t CI7 C '011i1s ''€tYi�r'°maYnr �Efl' j . 'Y(ICIi Y,r;ALI CRY-IA M.Nl N hA l)Rf fiv March 6r 1980 li fit.Ml4.Ahlnd All sS..t�t%. i i 1 certify for drelarrl tinder lienaliv of perjury that the forego. I ing i%trtmr end eorrrrt. Dated at.....................Garden-Grove..... ... Califorryia.Il c . Gth., a c. ..1'7........ f........... tiignaturr 1 I t rurn too.W-01g 1 1 • 1 City of Huntington Beach j P.O. OOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92M OFFICE OI. 'nu: CITY CLERK March 19, 1980 Mr. Charles Mathwin Airs Truck Leasing & Rental Corp. 7531 McFadden Avenue i Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Dear Mr. Mathwin: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held r Monday, March 17, 1980 overruled the decision of the Planning Commis3ion and approved Special Sign Permit #79-50. Please contact the Department of Development Services for further information (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth ti City Clerk 1 AMW:cd cc: Jim Palin, Director of Development Services y I REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION!' Submitted by James W. Palin Department Development Services Date Prepared March 7, , 19 80 Backup Material Attached El Yet D No Subject Aral to Planning Commission's Denial or Special Sign Permit No. 79-5 Located North of McFadden Ave. and Approximately 414 Ft. East of Gothard St. City Administrator's Comments APWk0VED HY CITY CODNCM Approve as recommended ...... . S Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Q Transmitted for consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 79-5, a request to construct a 38 ft. high, 77 sq. Et. freestanding sign in the M1 Light Manufacturing District. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and the Planning Staff recommend that the Council uphold the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 79-5. It is also recommended that the Council adopt the findings as imposed by the Planning Commission on February 5, 1980. ANALYSTS: Appellant: 'pp Avis Truck Leasing and Rental Ccrp. i 7531 McFadden Ave. Huntington Beach, Calif. Applicant: Av':s Truck Rental Corp. 7531 McFadden Ave. Huntington Beach, Calif. Location: North side of McFadden, approx. 414 ft. east of Gothard Street. Request: To permit the construction of a 37 ft. 8 in. high freestanding, double-faced, interior illuminated sign adjacent to the San Diego Freeway. The sign cabinet is 7 ft. 8 in. wide by 10 rt. high and will advertside "Avis Truck Rental. " / rio 308 Page Two PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY BAUER, SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 79-:. WAS DENIED WITH FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Bazil, Shea, Bauer NOES: Greer ABSENT: None ?►BSTAIN: None DTSCU$SION: Special Sign Permit No. 79-5 is a request to construct a 37 ft. 8 in. high freestanding double-faced, interior illuminated sign adjacent to the San Diego Freeway. The sign cabinet will measure 7 ft. 8 in. wide by 10 ft. high and will advertise "Avis Truck Rental." The proposed sign is proposed to be placed on a 10 in. diameter by 30 ft. high steel pole. The proposed sign is oriented toward the San Diego Freeway, and if constructed would be visible by traffic traveling both north and south. There is an existing 40 ft. high, freestanding sign on the site located approximately 240 ft. northwest of the proposed new sign location. This sign is also oriented toward the San Diego Freeway. The existing sign advertises "Peterson Trucking" and "RV Storage." Construction of the proposed new pole sign would exceed the maximum sign height limitation stated in Section 9760.13 of the ordinance Code. Freestanding signs in the Industrial district are allowed a maximum height of ten feet and a maximum area of sixty square feet for sites in excess of one acre. The proposed sign would also exceed the maximum allowable sign area by 16.5 feet. The proposed sign has a total sign area of 76.5 square feet for one side of the sign. Section 9760.13 of the Ordinance Code also states that sites in excess of one acre shall be permitted only one freestanding sign per site. In summary, staff feels that Avis Truck Rental has adequate exposure on McFadden Avenue which is classified as a ; secondary arterial and has approximately 9500 vehicle trips per day. Staff analysis also indicates that the business would be allowed two, 40 sq. ft. wall signs that could be located on the east and west ends of the existing building for advertising purposes. These cwo signs would be seen by vehicles traveling both east and west on McFadden Avenue. Because of this, staff does not believe a ' substantial economic hardship exists, and does not feel there are � any exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning classification. Therefore, staff and Planning Commission concur that the applicant has not met the criteria for approving a Special Sign Permit. !1j �I r 1 a Page hree FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. Strict compliance with the Ordinance Code will not result in any substantial economic hardship. 2. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to the properties in the same zoning classification. i 3. The granting of this request would constitute the granting of a special privilege. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reverse the Planning Commission's action and approve Special Sign Permit No. 79-5. FINDINGS: 1. Strict compliance with Article 976 will result in a substantial ' economic hardship to the applicant. 2. The proposed sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area. 3. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to properties in the vicinity of said sign. 4 4. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular j traffic vision. I SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Letter of Appeal 2. Area Map 3. Site Plan and Sign Elevation 4. Staff Report 5. Planning Commission Minutes, February 5, 1980 R pectfully s ted, es Pa in Department of Development Services _ ,--- - J � •`�: ` 1`I• * �_ a.• 1 • C R C FIV ' LLJ s 5SP79 - 5 � ► .To kuxtu+GION KAC16 PLMNUrc KPT i . :15 IfAy1N(i U1t1'UHAiIQN / 1508 SOU111 ALAMEIIA SMEEI, LOS ANGFLLS• CA►IFURNIA DW21 :tit Mewitil 751 McFadden Ave. ,11untington fiepr ', -nllf. n2647 / 714- 801,.5644 C z �+ MUCK LEASING R1 +o AND RENTAL CT 311 !O . . � n w r c' i'ehrunry 1.5, 19110 City Council j Huntington Beach, Calif. Subject: 191Wcial Sign Permit No. 79.5 f Coucilmens i Avis would like to appeal to the council to reconsider our application for a free standing as requested in rear original application to the planning comi'ssion Jan. 14, 1980 and denied by the Commission action Feb. 5, 1080. Ve would like to take the three items in order and discuss our views individually. Item 1: Ft'rfet compliance with the ordinnnce code will result in substnntial economic hardship. ' Aviis depends a great deal on visual idertification to all typed of potential truck usere. While rr rent to household movers, our business :'epen/'s to n much greater extent on connnareial business both In our long term full service les:sing .. prngrnm and in our deilr rental progrnm. 't'hr, t•hmmis;rizr.2,1n its report state. Il.at VeFadden Ave. is •1 senordRry nrtnrinl with traffic volumes ectiml4ted at ',..iA) vehicles per day. Not h.vinf; et11r1 surveys available we son not agree with or disclaim the flgiire quoted, however, the proximity to Golden Nest College and the. housing trpr.t to the utst of the f .railroad tracks anti north of McFadden "ve. would tend to discount thn statement of the staff as to an "adequate exposure for advortisirg the truck rental huai"e ss". Avis feels that th - freeway free standing sign Is of utmost economic importance for Avis to be identifiable and be shl to draw from the much greater exposure of all types of truck users on the Son Diego Freewal. Fxposure allways converts to dollars in eny business. Lock of exposure will result In fi"pnclal loss. t Item 2: There is exceptional and extraordinary circumstances that does not npply nenrrplly � to the properties in the some zoning classification. 11artingtonBeII& is a cr.actal r area generally considered to be relattvly flat, that is ajotning prepnrtirs are j! generally of the some grade elevation. Ye quote from the staff report. "etaff P% 1 1 ASING C0147UIIAt1UN / 1508 SQUTN ALAMEDA STREET. LOS ANGELES, CAI 1IpIMIA '30021 ' is 130 /411 Jlir)I 75{�McFsdllon Ave., Huntington tteae'*"N.Calif. Q2647 / 714.. 1191.41144 pege two MUCK LEASING ANO RENTAL concurs Lint the vocation of the existing business is situ•ted on a more visuplly innccecsible portio^ of McFadden Avenue". I'lecause of the treat differences of property and street elevations there is exception_ al and extraordinary circumstance that does apply to this property. Avis takes exception to the next portion of the staff report, "however, the prepared freeway oriorted sign will trot help this situation either." Quite the contrary Is in fact trno. The proposed free standirg sigin placed eat the esrt end of the rlhop building aojncent M the ,`freeway rightlof way will actually serve three purposes. ` 1. South bound traffic on the San Diego Freeway. 2. North bound traffic on the San Diego Freeway, 3. Kent bound traffic on McFadden avenue. Wert bound traffic on VcFadden will actually front view the proposed sign as they crosr the bridge west bound over the freeway. ivia in conjunction with our sign company, metrical Products Corp., actually pinred a yellow ealtvet' et the proposed height red exact pole position and viewed it many times while driving both directitinr on the freeway and hest hound on McFadden Avenue. The placement of the free standing sign in conjurction wit11 the pronosel! building sign would give Avis the best possible identification and oxpoallrc on moth the freeway and McFadden Avenue. _Thc staff report seemed to concern itself only with Etgns relnted to a►'rCnVi n Ave. anti chose to lCrore the freeway importance. The staff report did rat r+ention the oxistin-r treys growing on McFadden Ave. that even nov prrtlally block the egst and of the building facing McFadden Ave. As the trees continue to grow t'-r er j Ord of the building may wery well tie effectivly blocked from view. 7'i1e height of the sign must be p aced in proper prospective. accordiry to t.11n staff ; it would seem as if we are asking for a sign to he placed to a hafoht a' 37 feet from the street elevation of McFadden Ave, this is not true. We must remr.rh:r ; the base of the bign will he approximatly 15 feet under the elevation of the freeway and except that from the bridge and only a rrmnll dtrtance on 'drFndden Ave. the free standing sign will not be lainly visible from "cCadden Ave. "'he irtance t or the bridge and short space on 'le adden Ave. will effectivly alert drivers as to the Avis location. Item 3: The grantinU of this request would not constitute the grantinq of a special privilege that precedent has hot allready established. The need for freeway exposure is well eofined in the application and granting of the request by "Old World" for their existing 55 foot sign. �vlr, Ltn51NG cUI1POHATION / SO T 1 AM6 4 STHE T. L S ANGEL S. C If HNI 9W t l7 3 • ',, i.c ac�iden ve., 'unt ngton Pea- -% E �f. 4647 � �11 Q• ��«5n•'* page three MUCK LEASING AND nENTAL I-'e, nF per the staff report, are on a secondary' arterial with an estimated 0500 1-chic,les per day_ and this is supposed to suffice, ho%vver, Levitz Furniture, w! ich V, Incated on f'ilirger o ma,lor street with many times the traffic of "rFcdden Ave., realizod the important• of the freeway and wrs allowed to erect a extra lrrge sign _ which must he at least 75. feet it height. Conclusion:' I? rt " is wish to become a viable pert of this community. I as manag^r am a member -,f the Huntington Pear.h Chamber of Commerce. All, wife and T aro considering Innving to this oroa, preferably Huntington teach. 's a rnMnen,y:re do `not believe we ire asking to much that has not been previously IUrartcd. Tt is ,admitted inithe staff report. that this is a special piece of prolteiti. In all of HuntingtonReachjthe freew4y is limi-ted. It only seep-c to he good business judgement to .take 'odvat`oge to the fullest of that limited Area. Tt would seem incongruous that business away from th^ freeway and in case of one on a well traveled majjr street be _I d apparent sign variances in both height and size and then danyesmaller lowelAk"R a business oct:!ally adjacent to the. same freeway. AF T have stated before, "Fyposure allway3 converts to dollars inany business. Lank of exposure will result in .financial loss. Once again T would like to.state, Avis is primnri y a Full Service Truck BeAsing Company along with our daily rental business. k:e are a clean business. !°P usnrnd that our equipment and facilities are allways in top condition. We, With our full servio! loosing and rental busiotss offer a quality service to thn com�lunity and orange County. As I have sold hefere, AviF wishes 'to become n virhle p.Irt of the community And at the same time " want it to he, ar•d I am sure you do rs well, { a profitable part of they community. # respectfully Charles W. %Inthtvin .Strtion �'anaQer c/c file C tington beach development services department STAff REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development Services/Planning Division DATE: February 5, 1980 SUBJECT: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 79-5 F j.. APPLICANT: Avis Truck Rental DATE ACCEPTED: Jan. 14, 1980 c/o Charles W. Mathwin 7531 McFadden MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: Huntington Beach, CA. March 15, 1980 92647 REQUEST: To permit erection of ZONING: M-1 a 30 foot high free- standing sign; sign GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: will be double-faced, Mixed Development interior illuminated flex sign with dimen- • ACREAGE: 1. 43 Gross Acres sions of 718" x 10' EXISTING USE: Trucking LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side company, and RV storage of McFadden Street -ad- jacent to the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks and approx. 414 feet east of Gothard Street 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 79-5 based on the Findings outlined in Section 7.0 of this report. 2.0 GENERAL INFOP14ATION: Special Sign Permit No. 79-5 is a request to construct a 3718" ' high freestanding double-faced, interior illuminated sign adjacent to the San Diego Freeway. The sign cabinet will measure 718" wide x 10' high and will advertise "Avis Truck Pental" . There is an eKisting 40 foot high, freestanding sign on the site located approximately 240 feet northwest of the propsed sign location. This sign is also oriented toward the San Diego Freeway. The sign advertises "Peterson Trucking" and "RV Storage" . A•F M-13A Staff Report - SSP 79-� • February 5, 1980 Page 2 3.0 SWU ARY OF ISSUES: i In accordance with Section 9760.44 of the Ordinance rode, the Commission may grant a special, sign permit providing for relief from the strict application of the previsions of the Ordinance Code subject to a Finding that the following conditions exist: a) Strict compliance with the sign code will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant; and b) The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the ' area; 'and c) The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the properties located in the vicinity of such signs; and i d) The sign does not obstruct pedestrian and vehicular proposed traffic vision. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On-premise signs are categorically exempt from CEQA requirements (Section 1511, Class 11, State EIR Guidelines) . 5.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: t The properties located to the east of the subject site and across the 4 San Diego Freeway are zoned R1, Single Family Residential and are designated on the General Plan as Low Density Residential. The property west of the subject site presently consists of the vacant P & E railroad right-of-way and property developed with single family residences. The property is located within the boundaries of the ` City of Westminster. The property located to the south of the subject site and across McFadden Avenue is within the North Huntington Center Specific Plan zoning and is designated on the General Plan as Mixed Development and Commercial. The property fronting on McFadden Avenue ' -in the Specific Plan Area is currently developed with apartment units. 6.0 ANALYSIS: t'�I Construction of the proposed new pole sign would exceed the maximum r. sign height limitation stated in Section 9760.13 of the Ordinance Codd. Freestanding signs in the industrial district are allowed a maximum height of 10 feet and a maximum area of 60 square feet for sites in r' excess of one acre. The proposed sign would also exceed the maximum allowable sign area by 16.5 feet. The proposed sign has a total sign area of 76.5 square feet for one side of the sign. Staff Report - SSP 79 r•� • February 5, 1980 Page 3 The Planning Commission may grant a special sign permit providing for relief from the strict application of the sign code if conditions listed in Section 3.0 of this Report are found to exist for the project proposal. The applicant has indicated in part (see attached letter) that the location of the building on the southwest corner of the property, and the location of an existing block wall on the property, fronting McFadden Avenue,make the installation of a freestanding sign a necessity. The applicant also expresses the fact that it would be difficult for i a person driving west on McFadden Avenue to see a sign advertising "Avis Truck Rental" . - 1 Staff concurs that the location of the existing business is situated 1 inaccessible portion of McFadden Avenue however, the on a more visually n proposed freeway-oriented sign will not help this situation either. Even though Staff concurs that the Findings relating to detriment of property, adverse affect on other signs in the area and the possible •' obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic visiun can be met ,by the applicant. There are no indications that a substantial economic hardship exists. Staff analysis indicates there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, ;. buildings, or premises to prevent the site from being advertised as outlined in Section 9760.14 of the Ordinance Code. •r� Staff recommends to the applicant that two wall signs be attached to N: the existing building, one located on the east elevation of the building, and the other located on the west end of the building. By locatingAi : signs in these two areas, advertisement of the business will be seen • from east and west hound traffic on McFadden Avenue, with no visual dis- .._• tractions to the vehicle operators. Based on Section 9760.14 of the Ordinance Code, Avis Truck Rental Co. would be allowed an 80 sq. ft. wall sign. This sign area can be divided in half allowing two, 40 sq. ft. wall signs which can be placed on the east and west ends of the building for advertising purposes. McFadden Is classified as a secondary arterial and traffic volumes are estimated at 9500 vehicles per day;p y; ^taff. feels this is more than adequate for advertising the truck rental business. t 7.0 RECOMMnNAATION: The Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 79-5 based on the following Findings: Findings: t. 1) Strict compliance with the Ordinance Code will not result in any substantial economic hardship I February 5, 1986 Page 4 2) There is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstance that does not apply generally to the properties in the sam- zoning classification. 3) The granting of this request will constitute the granting of special privilege. Attachments: �) Area Map 2) Site Plan 3) Sign Elevation 4) Letter from Applicant } i SMS/dc Y �lI (I S TI :j i �I i n� P—a L - = WE gQD _ CO • s i. .r+wro a "*..*I P1ter—STANVvya SIGH . .+w+r+•V « swot+ IVEO-a r e ST_.S Tre eT-7nTi;.yeCT79 6oTH a rd ,H vN7w q1ejv Circle : acc ross = � '`' .. .- rFrom OrIve 6nTr?n;e I `of -•I .� �....r •� � � Cis aL foe�viS •i*a�.,e , 'SFl:FIG 3 rOA andP vfldr..tinas 11ton Pte�Sefp t _ Ar•,, Svilr�ln9 Srgrt. tr + I t S.I. lnlettoo lltuv NeV Srael tBN .SPecr--Sr*n.P?ermr AegWess, C. ' =75.Tr-MrFsJJpn -. 'unFigTon 3eack.Ca. q2647 �' t 1 7 y-s K l^ipp � i rsON Q f M • t— T -J- r r± n ` . 7/44) � -i � •� z I r l� I T RUCK RENTAL :`�rc...� fieG�r�„i € R �/ STor.7ye ST1i ! Ava ti \ \ ! t `• . tell :"..1tfC :?lir.�•.- ri j Th W 1 W f m � c a t { Q O� t ¢ Gn W � Ct, QQ _ SpeCla-1 5,,1►i PCritliT kcqu ,s-' by ' �f P!Jy Qlt:lf1ar r'y-• --- /• j y�.:1� ��'.r .If��1 f� 1 - I T D.►n� f,r^r" .fa _ _ l7 vm7wo;e+h l Publish March 6, 19BO - 140TICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMISSIDN'S DENIAL OF SIGN PERMIT 79-5 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City nf Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, 30 Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7__. � P.M- , or as soon thereafter as ' possible oa Mundy the 17th day of _ March �. 19_80. gal to the Planning Commission's action on for the purpose of considering an alp. 5 1980 of the denial of Special Sigh Permit No. 79-5. Special Sign Permit February , 79-5 is i requ est to permit the construction of a 77 sq. ft. free-standing sign in the M-1 Light Manufacturing District. The proposed sign, 38 ft. high and internally iilumin?ted requires a sFecial sign permit hecause the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code allows only one (1) free-standing sign on the site. The proposed sign is 1 17 s it. larger than the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code allows. approximately q , The subject sign is proposed to be located on property north of McFadden Avenue and approximately 400 ft. east of Gothard Street. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. ; All interested persons are invited to attend .,aid hearing and express their opinions for or against said�p�j-� Sinn permit N - II Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 D.9TEU March 3, 1980 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk i I I i Publish March 6, 1980 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLA.HNIkG C"ISSION'S DENIAL OF . SIGN PERMIT 79-5 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council n of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as s possible on Monday the 17th day of March 19 804 for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's action on February 5, 1980 of the denial of Special Sign Permit No. 79-5. Special Sign Permit 79-5 is a request to permit the construction of a 77 sq. ft. free-standing sign in the M-1 Light Manufacturing District. The proposed sign, 38 ft. high and internally illuminated requires a special sign permit because the Huntington Beach Ordinance 4 Code allows only one (1) free-standing sign on the site. The proposed sign is approximately 17 sq. ft. larger than the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code allows. � ! The subject sign is proposed to be located rn property north of McFadden Avenue and � approximately 400 ft., east of Gothard Street. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. All interested persons are invit2r' to attend said hearing and express their , I opinions for or against said pedal Sight.. Nn_ 79_5 Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536.5227 DATED March 3, 1980 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk n NOTICK TO CLERK TO SCIIEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ' ITEM rG�u�U ����tt � , v ►y► ( f�1"� 7Cl :� TO: CITY CIEEtK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE _ y Its. DAY Oh MA(X- A _ 1900. AP's are attached j.-- AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning C, ission Planning Department ,_ s Petition Appeal X -_ Other Adoption of Environmental Status W YES NO Hafer to _1� (k.i: 's:+rar'g, Planning Department - Extension f15,511 for additional information. * If appeal please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal. i 1 i 1 � n Number of Excerpts Publish Once LEGAL NOTICE /T PL� Cv+�++.���t.r t NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ,,.,,, of g�, ��,f•. �i" NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a ors by the cityG r�u NL�c,. public hearing will be held of the City of Huntington Beach California, for the purpose of considering Ac A Jrrron� r,A/ >+�'�b � 1104 o1�•f�. dxr�QI L r,� ,c.Ic1 I.r ��o�t►.� ��'»^t -� No. ''� 1"'�• 51 gAJ jut,") �o • '7'�•� 1r+�� DI Y$ � ��.Y w1�-� -{•�.�. G.vr�tru�'t'�n N J� �. '7 t� -�`,�•.?rQ�"�1p nd�N� Lt'�h`r Not mLk1 fckc,+�, y%ykj � )j V nejC.,T F�haoc�N Qi yck ky%aAte �' `� 1 � c►v� �v1�'�eYvtialt`� t1 I,qr��er fah -�,•�., �4�v►►n-� svut'�t� � P� Cvd` g11Avd� � 'i1r+ fwl� ac't• ir�a�IJ ��• pr•Po -to ����1t'1A1'�C.�t Pr.Phr 000t, AMC'f*dAh M4,, gt,01 Op ro -eai•t Said hearing will be held at the hour oa �� �f: 2 b P.M. , on in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend ss :d hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. ',eelephone No. (714) 536-5271 BATED this _ day of CITY PrLANNING COMMISSION By q 1 -79-5 ' Orwga Cb. Flood Control Cdnt.A, 142-272-0© 'Amory 11, 19dn `�p.o. tart 1078 , Fwamury I'aw 1 - Dom Santa Ana, C71. 42702 ' Lxw Rm 41 m E��evi h, Ch. 92647 Avis Truk Aental 142-274-09 142-272-09 7531 M raddmn 4t mmm SchINiQt ; Kieth ('Xttucia lkmtincj m laser. C*. 92647 7651 Sugaar Orive 15241 >4turst CLMM i lMtin"m beach, CR. 92647 ww 6djwtsr, CA. 92683 142-271-04 142-272-01 142-272-10 Mirhftl '1m' Vaum 7531 lk s Avanaie 15371 Cw=& Cram 15461 Shasta Lana Hunts qbm 9aach, C.A. 92647 BmtUgbcan Imo, Ch- 92647 ; HUntincr m beach, Ch. 92647 142-271-05 1p l 112ar Qrenk lbfA�rn Jr. � Safrrind Vil).ayr 7Stll !1cS'adK]an Am" i 13381 � Litre Melvin Hoff tttnti forth, CA. 92647 Nmtinom pMcfic CR. 92647 142-471-01 142-272-03 r 142-472-02 t d m im ti ' seadixi village 7777 Ow ftr �rrive i 15391 C1emm& Lore i Melvin Ibeffl gar ttuntbIgtm 9Mch, cA. 92647 amtinom Coach, Ch. 92647 13919 5truiilumn mad _ _ _ _ _ Owritne,.Ch. 90701 142-072-02 ' 142-272-04 ' 142-311-22 amst cmmnity Collage tuft. Masattezu .Tolley � Fdnrt VArshner 2101 ibirview %Wd 1 15401 Cascmde LWO 15462 V r unt Strost rbftA Mena, CR. 92626 ; mmtSrqlnn 9e69h, Ch. 92647 ; Mwt%Uwr.+er, CK. 926IJ W. Fright-of-wy i 142-272-05 142-311-2.) Clio S. Mlli n 5treat Robext 1Lairn id lLia m Meshy Jr. toe "Iwo C►. SWU i 154U 000 trl Lam I_5472 Vix acmt .St. Ww*jrq'bon !lomah, Ch. 92647 vlbftadrrter, Cal. t .''nutfistcn C LA f.Y Wism 1142-272-a6 . _ _ _ _ _ - - - • - - _ - •142-311-24 . . 19171 Mbgwlia Street ; James SMErs ; .taunita Harris ihmd #cm Nosh, CA. 92646 15421 C'amemb tmwa 15482 Vaummt St. IhL* rgtm lwach, CX. 92647 womminetar, Ch. _ . . . 4 . - - - - - - - . - ' 142-311-25 ` War Itabert . ' 15492 17artaont f. }; Uiaetmi natar, Ch. ,t 1 { c r I J ':' Orm-o s Cb. F10W Cmtml Dtimt.'-� 142-272-•08 ++amAxy 11, 198n '�P.O. Res[ 1078 ROWNGary Fkvan I►eqs 1 - Dom Sw" Anse Cal. 92702 ; 15441 CASOAda LOW ` "timju n Ij"ch, Cal. 92647 1 We T&udc Pmn►tml 142-274-09 142-272-09 7531 Wadc%m Tha o Sduidt ; K.ieth tkettrsis Ihtntitl am beach, Cal. 92647 7651 S'uW privy 15241 Amtwxst Circle 1 HuntinAm MOM, C R. 92647 Meetainstsr, C.A. 92683 1 142-271-04 1142-272-01 142-277-10 Niched patnacsnn ltidmd llNaaxamt Tumv V"rm 7531 Md''addan 11wm 15371 C*mCmdn Lranr L5461 Shestw Lane If ntington Beach, Cal. 92647 UmtLrgtm bjech, Cal. 92647 ; thmtingtcn Nnach► Cal. 92647 1 142-271-05 ; 142-•272-02 2 41 on w ---------�--- ft=* Hoff"m Jr. tby flanaMrr 1 Seavind Village 7501 !'wad/3en Avwm 15381 Casarde Lens Malvin Hoff ' itutt .ngtmn , CK. 92647 1 Ruttinrban !ftedti• Ch. 92647 1 , l 4?-471-Q1 - • - �-142-277-03. . . - .. _ - i 142^472-02 . . . . . _ terwel RnbWgxiMr ; Hdrard Mrtirm ; Saawind ViLL&ge ! 47777 t3*x Drive i 15391 Cwrrle Li[b , Melvin floe f fligar Iltntin coon 8esch, Cal. 92647 1 Munttrgtm ftech, CA. 92647 13919 StruUumn Rcnd '_- • - -- - - - - _ _ - • _ _- aerritcr, Ch. 90701 i _ _ - - - - - - - -_ __ _ _r _ _ 142-072-02 142-•272-04 142-311-22 f axot Ommrdty WISP mist. 114 u vpkmt .To1Lrp , Aobaert Karp 'jw � 2701 WrvUw Rmd 15401 QuKa a Law 115462 Vrrmnt Street rbstA mom, Ch, 92426 , Huntin7ton Mach, Ca. 9260 ; WestmUmter, Ch. 92683 i 4 I rv. rdght-of--.nty i •142-272-05 i 142-311-23 610 S. MIA Street 1 ftftCt FAiM. will.im Mwryeley Jr. fin Amplee, Ca. 90014 ; 154U CesorrU Lena 15472 VarAml-. St. Huntington Desch, Cal. 92647 I wesawb etrr, J4. r ' -1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• - - . _ �. . . . . . .savtlftrn Cat. musm - - - - 1 142-272-06 142-311-24 19171 "Wralia Street ; .T,e me 3ikra ; .Tatnita Harris Ihnd gltan Reach, Q1. 926" 15421 Cmec a b Lane 15482 Vier acnt St. R1,rttinOm beach, Ch. 92647 Westrimter, CN. 142-311-25 I Haber Tolbert ' 15492 %Amy runt Rt. ii 4uminswr, Cal. r ' 1 I 1 1 1 � r 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 I 1 • i 1 I I AVIS LEASING CORPORATION / 1508 UtN ALAMEDA STREET, LOS ANGELES, CALi' t ORNIA 90021 / 1217) 748.8601 7531 McFadden Ave. ,lluntington Peach, Calif. 92647 / 714- 691-5844 co M3 t.Tl p r iv rn TRUCK LEASING �v }anrir" AND RENTAL, z ca i'ebrunry 15, 1990 City Council Huntington Beach, Calif. Subject: Special sign rermit Va. 79-5 Coucilman: Avis would like to appeal to the council to reconsider our application for n free standing as requested in our original application to the planring commiattion Jan. 14, 1980 and denied by the Conmissiaa action Feb. 5, 080. V,e Mould like to take thr, three items in order and discuss our views individunlly. Item 1 : Strict complinnce with the ordinnnce mite will result in substantial economic hardship. Avis depends a great deal on visual idertification to all types of potential truck users. While ve rent to hcusebold movers, our business aepane s to a much greater extent nn cammercinl business both in our Iona .erm full service, leasing program and in our daily rartnl program. The c•ommisri,3r in its report stater that +6ndden .Ave. is a secondary arterial with traffic volumes estimated at 0500 vehicles per dny. Not hawing acturl surveys available we can not agree with or disclaim the figilre quoted, however, the proximity to Golden Pest College and the housing tract to the nest of the railroad tracks and north of %'rFndden Ive. would tend to discount the atatnment of the staff as to an "adequate exposure for advertisirg the truck rental husiness". Avis feels that th- freeway free standing sign is os utmost economic importance for Avis to be identifiable and be ahl to draw from the irllch greater exposure of all types of truck users on the San Diego Freeway. Exposure nllways converts to dollars in any business. Lack of exposure will result in finpnclal loss. Item 2: There Is exceptional and extraordinary Circumstances that does not apply generally to the properties in the care zoning clnssifientior. lluntingtoglieach is a coastal area generally considered to be relativly flat, that is ajoining properties are generally of the same grade elevation. Ve quote fron the staff report. "Staff Id� AVIS LEASING CORPOnATION / 1508f UTH ALAMEDA STREET, LOS A,VGELES, CALIr0i1NIA C0021 / 1213) 748$E01 7551 �IcFaVen Ave., Huntington }'each, Calif. 92647 / 714- A91-51344 MM pcge two TRUCK LEASING ANr RENTAL concurs that the location of the existing business is situ-tee on a more visually inaccessible portior of :icFndden Avenue". Because of the great differences of property and street elevations there is exception- al and extraordinary circumstance that does nllply to this property. Avis takes exception to the next portion of the staff report, "however, the proposed freeway oriented r.ign will rot help this situation either." quite the contrary is in fact trips. The proposed free standing sign placed at the east end cf the shop building adjacent So the freeway right of way will actually serve three purpnser. 1. South bounl, traffic on the Fan iliego Freeway. 2. North bound traffic an the Fein Diego Freeway. 3. West bound traffic on McFadden avenue. l`lest bound traffic, on Pcredden will actually first vier the proposed sign as they cross the bridge west hound over the freeway. Avis in conjunction vAth our sign comr-nny, metrical Products Corp., actually placed a yellow canvas at the proposed height -rd exact pole position and viewed it many times while criving both directionr on the freeway and west bound on PeFedden Avenue. The placement of the free standing sign in conjurction with the pronoseO building sign would give Avis the best passible identification and exposure on both the freeway and McFadden Avenue. The staff report seened to concern itself only with signs related to Merad.,!en Ave. and chose to ignore the freeway importance. The staff report elf,. -ot mention the oxistinn ire-?s growinU on McFrdden Ave. that even nov., prrtially block the east and of the building facing McFadden Ave. As the trees continue to grow the er:rt end of the building may wary well Ile effectivly blocked from viecv. The height of the sign must be paced in proper prospective. According to thr. stuff It would seem as if lie are asking for a sign to he pInced to a height o: 37 feet from the street elevation of McFadden Ave, this is not true. Ile must relrenher the srse of thn sign will 1,e approxiraily 15 rest under the Qlevrtion of the .•�' freeway and except that from the bridge and only n mall dirtince on ttcFndden Ave. the free standing sign will not be plainly visible from 'TeFadden Ave. The istnnce or the bridge and short space on "cFndllon Ave. will effectivly alert drivers as to the Avis location. Item 3: The granting of this request would not constitute the granting of a special privilege that precedent has not, nllrendy established. The need for freeway exposure Is itell defined In the application and grantinS of the request by "Old t:orld" for their existing 55 foot sign. P"1 , • AV15 LEASING COF1PdRAT10N 1 1 TREET qL ratonLl'C Cll: 4 TH rMIM00 �)47 QB� �l�5144 page three LW TRUCK LEASING AND RENTAL 1 i V:e, as per the staff report, art, on a ser.ondary arterial with an estimated 0300 %'Chicles per day and this is supposed to suff;ce, however, Levitz furniture, which ; is located on Edinger a major street with many times the traffic of 1110'eddeu Ave., i realized the importance of th- freeway and tans allowed to erect a eytrn large sign which must he at lent 75 feet in height. i Conclusion: ►,;e at 1vix vrish to became a��viable Commerceart of �l�'.1, wifellandyi arescansidering movier am a ng of the huntington Bear.h Cha ..r 3 to this arev, preferably 11urtington Peach. As a componlwre do rot believe ve are asking to much that has not been previously grantcd. It is Edmittcol in the staff report that tilts is a special piece of to beproperty. In all of Huntington Bench MI. free►•3y is limited. It only ems good busines-s judgement to take advatage to the fullest of thnt limited area. Tt would seem incongruous that business away from th^ frees-.ay and i,- case of one on a well traveled majgr street be glowed apparent sign variances in both height and size and then deny4amaller lower/'�Yh a business ortually adjacent to the same freeway. As I have stated before, "frpoture allways converts to dollars in any business. Lack of exposure %-.ill result in financial loss. Once again I would like to state, Avis is primnri 'y a Full Service Truck Leasing along with our daily rental business. VC. are n clean business. We do.nand Company g y that our oquipmant and facilities are allwsys in top condition. 1';e, with our full service leasing and rental business offer a quality service to the community and Orange County. As I have said before, Avis wishes to become a viable part of the corn.munity and at the same time we want it to re, ur.d I am sure you do as well, a profitable part of the community. respectfully Charles W. Ynthwin I. Strtion ":arnger c/c :31e '.I I 1 _ fl. ti r r "t1' i 3�', 'y ► ti 41. " :"Y-Vie;- - -• _ .r.� 1. p�`ttlINTINGTON F3E C 63 r /15JrG 7;,a'i It. �. Tiplarpli NtACH.CALIFOIN1A 1126" • i•; ;ir ,.,.CIT1� 1 UNt�1—WARMAN 0.HALL DLtT�1•pVIN0 ,f �, DATE� �1,• '�i •�� " �y I �•A00ltilist ��r� ♦ me H iD • ��1 err. f ,;� -�_' t-• :y .( ACCOUNT AMOUNT 1 IV ♦ iq ------------- 1 •� r� 14'Y ISSUING DEPARtMENT 1 ,r A8 1 OVA IN 77IF. Superior Court OF 'ME STATE OF CALIFORNIA l In and for the County of Orange 1 t CITY OF HUNTIMTON BEACH , CITY CLERK PROOF OF PUBLICATION Public Hearing ...........I............................................. State of Callfarnta County of Orange fJULMON Rita J. Richter ...................................... ................................................... fR:trttlpsa� �' t.,e rJt,.o aar► That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of the tip ea?1.�ri.1Ma United States,over the ape of twenty-one years,and that I am vot a party to,nor Interested In the above entitled matter;that I am the principal clef It of the printer of the 7a a a eae Huntington Beach Independent Reviews TM Mir�e�a. a newspaper of genera!circulation,published in the City of B" rwt tiMW Ai Huntington Beach s+� uM tea .. .. .. .. ... ........ , ..�,t�• i County of Orange and which newspaper Is published for the dis• Mar twrn serninatlon of local news and hdelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all limes herein mentioned had and still x+or has a bona Me subscription list of paying subscribers,and which t .• DA fhl lw�ta,le7l,y mwspaper has beet.established,minted and published at rcgulu mot tt+rea �;.,, .f . Intervals In the said County of Orange for a period exceeding one Orr., iCN f year;that the notice,of which the annexed Is a tinted as "7R�tt� been published In the regular and enure lesue of said newly h n"�=I'tt�4' Par flu newspaper. fMn�tie!�i(twi*t��M_..._-�� •: and not in any supplement thereof.on the following dates,to wit: December 211 1978 I certify for declare)under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct. i Dated at .......................Gard.en.QrPIY.R............ Califcrnl {thi ./RUA y Ag.0 ... Q. 974....... Signature 114VVV�t C - J f y f p.L.rLL�I11•t-!• /.� UcS c�C.C- 7) • ram` ` ."�' Publish December 21 , 1978 Postcards WrICE OF PUBLIC NEARING APPEAL TO DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PEDUT NO. 78-8 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington beach, at the hour of 7 ,0 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible, on Tuesday the ,_gild _ . day of —. JanuaU..— _, 19 79, for the purpose of considering an appeal filed to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 78-8 to permit one additional 60 sq. ft. free standing monument sign in an existing shopping center presently having a maximum square footage of free standing signs. The subject shopping center is located at the northeast corner of Beach Blvd. . and Garfield Avenue. A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information easy be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 (lain St. . liuntington Beach. CA. 92648 - (71y) 5*34 - 5Aa 6 DATND- December 18, 1978 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACJI BY: Alicia M. Nentomrth City Clerk 1 1 1 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by James W. Falin Department Planning and Env. Resources Date Prepared December 22, , 1978 Backup Material Attached Q Yes FJ No Subject APPEAL ON SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 78-8 NORTHEAST CORNER OF BEACH BOULEVARD AND GARFIELD AVENUE City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended. Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Aiternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for consideration is an appeal to the Planning Com- mission denial of Special Sign Permit No. 78-8 for the installation of air additional monument sign at an existing commercial center. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommends that the Council uphold Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 78-.8. ANALYSIS• Appellant: Ad Fact Sign Company Applicant: Ad Fact Sign Company P.O. Box 791 West Sacramento, California 95691 Location; 18922 Beach Boulevard, northeast corner of Garfield Avenue and Beach Boulevard. Reque3t: Installation of one freestanding monument sign having an area of 50 sgi:are fe-et. �I PIO 3178 I I I ram.__ _ •'� Page *&o PLANNING COMMISSION ON ON DECEMBER 5, 1978: ON MOTION BY COHEN AND SECOND E: RUSSELL, SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 78-8 WAS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS, BY THC FOLLOWING VOTE: AYE:3: Higgins, Russell, Finley, Cohen, Bazil, Paone NOES: None ABSENT: Stern ABSTAIN: None FINDINGS: 1. Strict compliance with the Sign Ordinance and the existing Sign Program for this center will not result in a substantial j economic hardship. } 2. There is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that does not apply generally to the property or classes of use in the same district. 3. The granting of this request will. constitute a special privilege. DISCUSSION: The subject center consists of two major tenants, which are restaurants, and located in detached buildings. The remaining businesses are located in an attached multi-tenant building. The signs for this center were approved through a special sign permit which allowed two freestanding signs along Beach Boulevard frontage and one freestanding sign along the Garfield frontage. All three of these signs are 50 square feet each and total 150 square feet for the center. Under Article 976, Sign Ordinance, this center would be allowed a total of two freestanding signs, each having a total area of 100 square feet, however, through 4 the special sign program, the applicant was allowed to split the square footage on Beach Boulevard and provide 100 square feet in ` two signs versus the permitted one. For this consideration, the developer reduced the square footage of the Garfield frontage sign to 50 square feet. All of the attached building signs within the center are less than what is permitted by the Sign Ordinance. One of the two signs located on the Beach Boulevard frontage identifies one of the freestanding restaurants in the center, while the other sign on Beach Boulevard identifies the tenants of the satellite buildings in the center. The one detached building for which this freestanding sign has been requested presently has two wall signs that meet the ordinance and two panel signs which are attached to the roof overhang and to the ground. These two signs were permitted under the special sign program because they are more than 20 feet from the ultimate right-of-.gray. This restaurant now contends that I , Page Three its existing siqning is inadequate for proper identification along Beach Boulevard and therefore, has requested a 50 square foot freestanding sign to match the freestanding signs now existing along Beach Boulevard. C At the December 5, 1978 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission discussed and directed staff to pursue a c-3de amend- ment that would allow for a more: flexible sign program in relation to major tenants and/or tenants of detached buildings within shopping centers. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Special Sign Permits are categorically exempt from environmental documentation. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Reverse Planning Commission' s action and approve Special Sign Permit No. 78-R with the appLopriate findings. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Letter of Appeal 2. Area Map 3. Site Map 4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 5, 1978 Respectfully submitted, ` James W. Palin Acting Planning Director JWP:SMB:gc 1 r ' lLYiYPilfii. _yww wr ___ I 1 7-7 1 � PLASTIC AND NEON SIGNS STORE FRONTS INTERIOR GRAPHICS CRANE SERVICE December 8, 1978 City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 ' Re: Special sign permit no.78-8 For: Straw Hat Pizza 18922 Beach Boulevard Huntington Beach, California Dear Sir: Please accept this as our appeal of the planning commission's denial of special sign permit no. 78-8. Following are circumstances which we believe are grounds for approval of the perry.::. 1. Straw Hat Pizza is requesting a permit to erect a 50 sq. ft. monument sign to identify their freestanding restaurant, which is situated in a planned shopping center. 2. The allowable freestanding si nage for this shopping center per code is 200 sq. ft. Three (31 i+wnument slyns are existing which total 150 sq. ft. There is 50 sq. ft. available per code. 3. The monument sign proposed is architecturally identical to the existing monument signs, 4. The planning commission is beginning now, based on our request, to revise the city ordinance to allow the tyre of sign.we are requesting without special approval. 5. Straw Hat Pizza is one of the two major tenants in the shopping cen'*er. The other major tenant does have a monument sign similar to our request, 6. The street identification is an economic necessity for the st;:,•ess of the restaurant. Sales records for this Straw Hat Pizza location 'dre 60% of break-even. This is in large part due to lack of identity. 'tilt ,.i P.O.BOXSA CRAM T • 1 1 i , 4 . i DEC 11. 1978 &.►.r,c7C C-O"Ins. . a� PLASTIC AND NEON SIGNS STORE FRONTS INTERIOR GRAPHICS MW� T 0 j CRANE SERVICE City Clerk (continued) 1 7. The spacing of the two existing monument signs and the proposed sign, being greater than 130 ft. , are such that there would not be a cluttered appearance on Beach Boulevard. Enclosed is our check for $75.00 for the appeal fee. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Charles Stechman Enclosure cc: Chuck Douglass Jim Torre CS:ev i s: .b BOX 791 W SACRAMENTO, II 1 �J ft i 1� t 1 I' it Ij I� 1 DEC 1 1918 "�'..{. T'{•."� CA.a AMC. S ' i . R3, I • 5' u �.� F.2 (R2 VR] MH M2 R3 + I I o � Q , � 3 • .. < E J . R342 1 v I •-'4 R3 R5 R R5 C41 _'. +.L II Rz RI z t PACFICA Akrm PL= 1' R2 R2 • \ �•J }'Rs ,1i ,�L� � R3 j i `� ; I �., RI J Ry /R5'i;l R 2 'ri _ �R2 R2' F �S , i�, RI " RI !� h i1i R2;,R2 J E �t� Y% i _ R 5 R2 .�- j= RZ51 '� s ! , E ;j• (� —�-- -- GARFIELD AV E. �CL �y - - -'-t t mac»�as.r �� c...e...r R2 `' ! i fit• 1 R5 _..,.... r C2 ! _ �,u: MI-0 r RI RI RI ~ RI.'-, i�Rt 1 f �`" l .7'• I I •ur..,or,•.r. �. , i RI R2 1 Rig j E =' R2 I i l s `r-+'S r I ;--- J1'RA R2 C4: S I Rt it:1 CF-E R' RI I i^ RI I r 1 M R2 41t1 R 1 ' R' �� p i i l p it R Ih3ci `C R! Ri Ri s Rl t- o �n1_.. R2 R ms —RI RI •r E RI IF h L, r , SPECIAL. SIGN PEFtmir 78 'i!i!mlI " CEltm nAaIIINIm K". 7 twntington beL.,.,*nning department toff ---.report . TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning nepartment DATE: Decer.Ler 5, 1978 SIJLCIAL SIGN PERMIT t1o. 78- 8 APPLICANT': Ad fact, Sigh Co. UAIT ACCGCTEM: Oct. 5 , 1978 I,. O. Box 791 W. Sacramento, CA 95691 MANI)ATORY PROCLSSI►aG DATE: hecember 9, .978 LOCATION: 18922 Beach, cast side of Beach, 200' north of ?,OPIU: C4 Garfield r" C_G IFIML PLAN: General Rl:1UE5'r: Removal of two double Commercial faced patio mount signs and instal, one EXISTING USE: Shopping Cente: monument sign (5' x 101 ) ACREAGE: 4.09 acres 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Deny Special Sign Permit No. 78-8 and direct staff to prepare a code amendment to correct deficiencies in Article 976, Sign Ordinance, to allow free-standing signs for detached buildings within shopping canters and major tenants of shopping centers. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit 78-8 is a request to permit one additional free- standing sign having an area of 50 square feet. This sign is to identify a restaurant located in one of the detached buildings xn the shopping center at the northeast corner of Garfield Avenue and Beach Boulevard. There are presently two free-standing signs along :the Beach Boulevard frontage of this shopping center and one free-standing sign on the Garfield. frontage of the center. 3.0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The major issues regarding Special Sign Permit 78- 8 are: 1 . Tito center presently has two free-standing signs on Beach Boulevard and one on Garfield Avenue that were approved by a Special Sign Pro- gram. .a..w yam::1. ...... ....... . .. .. .Y♦ I . .. .... .. . - .. .....w.i.l.... ,. ..... .. w. ti. .Mr.. .n..w.sws. Y!.u!!i�'.y„i.\,�� /1 Planning Commission - SSP 78-8 December 5, 1978 Page 2 2. Since the adoption of the present sign ordinance, Article 976, the Commission has acted on a number of requests for additional separate identification of. restaurants within shopping centers and major tenants in shopping centers. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Special Sign Permit No. 78-8 is a sign variance for an existina commercial use. Pursuant " to S: '1511 of the Cal.ifornia. Environ- mental Quality Act, "on premise signs" *is a class 3, categorical exemption, therefore, environmental assessment on the proposed sign is not necessary at this time. 5.0 SURRC)UNDING ZONING, LL,ND USE, AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIQN: Subject property is located at the northeast coLner of Beach Boule- vard and Garfield Avenue and is presently zoned, designated on the General Plan, and developed as General Retail Commercial. The properties located to the north of the subject center are also zoned,general planned, and developed as .General Commercial. ^o the east of the subject site, the property is zoned R2, developed with multiple family dwellings and designated on the General Plan as Medium Density Residential. The properties located to the south of the subject site, across Garfield Avenue, are zoned C4, Highway Commercial, partially developed with retail Commercial uses and designated on the General Plan as General Commercial. Located to the west of the subject site, across Beach Boulevard, the properties are again zoned, developed, and designated on the General Plan for General Commercial. 6.0 hNALYSTS: The subject center consists of two major tenants, which are restaurants, and located in detached building. The remaining businesses are located in an attached multi=tenant building. The signs for this center were approved through •a Special Sign Program which allowed two freestanding signs along the Beach Boulevard frontage and one freestanding sign along the Garfield frontage. All three of these signs are 50 square feet each and total 150 square feet for the center. Under Article 976, Sign Ordinance, this center would be allowed a total of two free- standing signs, each having a total area of' 100 square feet, however, through the Special Sign Program, the applicant was allowed to split the square footage on Beach Boulevard and provide the 100 square feet In two signs versus the permitted one. For this concession, the developer reduced the square footage of the Garfield frontage sign to 50 square feet. All of the attached building signs within the center are less than what is permitted by the Sign Ordinance. One of the two signs located on the Beach Boulevard frontage identifies one of the freestanding restaurants in the center while the other sign on Beach Boulevard identifies the tenants of the satelite buildings in the center. i Planning Commission - SSP 78--8 December 5, 1978 Page 3 The, one detached building for which this freestanding sign has been requested presently has two wall signs that meet the ordinance and two panel signs which are attached to the roof overhang and the ground. These two signs were permitted under the Special Sign Program because they are more than 20 feet from the ultimate right-- of way. This restaurant now contends that its existing signing is inadequate for proper identification along Beach Boulevard and therefore, has requested a 50 square foot freestanding sign to match freestanding signs .now existing along Beach Boulevard. Staff concurs t_nat this problem has occurred enough times since the adoption of the new Sign Ordinance to prove the need to pursue an amendment of the existing code to alleviate these problems. If the Planning Commission concurs with this problem, the staff is recommending that the Commission deny Special Sign Permit No. 78-8 and direct the staff to take immediate action in pursuing a code amendment that would allow for separate identification for detached buildings within shopping centers and/or major tenants of shopping centers. Staff is also offering the two following alternative courses of action for the Planning Commission' s consideration: 1. If the Commission cor,curs that a problem exists with the Sign Ordinance and wishes to pursue the necessary amendment to alleviate the problems, and feels that the applicant has justified his request, the Commission can approve .Special Sign Permit 78-8 an3 direct staff 'to pursue the proper steps in amending the i Sign Ordinance. 2. Maintain Article 976 in its existing state and continue to review each Special Sign Permit on its own merit. 7.0 RECOMMENDATION: The staff is recommending .that the Commission deny Special Sian Permit No. 78.-8 and direct staff to initiate a code amendment which will i allow for separate identification for detached buildings within shopping centers and/or major tenants within shopping centers. I The staff offers the following two sets of findings for the Planning Commission' s consideration. FINDINGS (Denial of Special Sign Permit No. 78-8) I. Strict compliance with the Sign Ordinance and the existing Planned Sign Program for this center will not result in a substantial economic hardship. 2. There is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstance that does not apply generally to the property or classes of use in the same district. Planning Commission - SSP- 78-•8 December- 5, 1978 page 4 3 . The granting of this request will constitute a special privilege. FINDINGS (Approval of Special Sign Permit No. 78-8) 1. The applicant has demonstrated a hardship and a need for a major business identification sign. 2. The granting of the request will not constitute a special privilege. , 3. The proposed sign will not impact any of the surrounding properties or land uses. 4 . There is a reasonable assurance that the applicant intends to proceed with the proposed request without undue delay. SMB:gc ATTACHMENTS: I . Area Map 2. Site Plan and Sign Elevation 3. Application 4 . Notice of Exemption i t •. f'< I NOTICE OF EXEMPTION � i Tot File f t PROJECT,APPLICATION,OR PERMIT NO: Special Sign Permit 78-8 PROJECT TITLEMESCR[PlIONAOCATION: Request to permit one additional . freestanding monument sign in an existing shopping center located on the northeast corner, of Beach Boulevard and Garfield Avenue. PROJECT SPONSOR: EMPTION IDEN7IP'ICA'I70N: 123 Categcriral E1VVpti0a L J Ongoing Neel i See. 15111 u See.15070 c3arc 11 Eawmr-ocy Exemption Activity not Defined as project Sec.15071 (N) & (c). Sec.15037 (b) !�r Mtnialetial Project Other(Explain) ; Sec.15073 i, t The project(ptirate)is a Icarer part of Another project for which an EIR has predoualy been prepared;the o►4bw +'r lJ project and EIR vitro approved. and there were no mbdantld dw" propaaed Io the luojeet to involve new '•' enAtonnrental Impacts riot o nWered in the original EIR. 7; (Sec.1S0b7) ; Original EIR Nnnnber: Date Approved: {1 Purru:nt to th-CAUFORNIA ENMOMUMAG QUALITY A(.7 OF 1970 and provisions of the NUNTi>'1GTON UEAQI ORMNANGE CODE,which psoride that nun activity Is exempt from enrironrnentel eraluatlon where it can be deteridaied %vid. ecruinty that the activity will not hays a dgnifteint effect on the environment,the activity referenced hrteln Is therefore meted EXP.1r1MON STATUS with the following statement of findlap: t: i 1 n i 11 �- e atnd SStle of Person Certifying Request Dttte: � 1 r i h , .r r r. hr 4 .7 t tti, t � i. ' L +� 1 f' i 'YI' MINN rit '"+ �tr+.C��°er A� Y,�`�.f .+i11+�'�,�! T15?r+'(,}+4 iAt yr ��"� ',j�'rr �h'�i t r ej •' •1�`..i5f `,i.'Y"-.}r::r t rt�:,�"1 t,t �".i{+y�r, �•fy..��,,.r1 1 4,f,•.rl� .f i{"d .} C t �� I+ Ifi'�R,'.;tCt-+;�}' }t �?J" (!rtf4.l�rr{t "•.f�,Atln'ty ri .1�, +Jf.�V .,tr�.t�i.�i,wr.1'��,�a•��„ 'er+'F'i"f4ptl;.�i{,f..nsi!+1�+(;�t,{t :f ,r.�.,,,A'•.r 1�A;1 e 4't•� ` .t! 6Y }Jx�s 5 y ti G�j u tt;t iR J v•, ,; 1 4..} r r. ,� L,i , ! rF r h[•., �jy. s .1.•f, r'i. q'rr yhi'r7"•�ra'r 'Y,•yy!y�>�41:�.N� Sr ;.• r,,��V{��•r}it 'y(,.i,g 1y. �+:elf i?�, Jtt'"`.1 l� 4F •� Y1 1r,7 +.�..k'j r: ;. ..J.Y y:�f :! t r f r �t: �[.f? •ji. rt+r�.._p��Sr. S �.",i.V i;!•* ��ti 1�, .�,� ../ !"{r`.,1, A.�� 1 •�rl! 4•.1t �:r'! 1,T hhed i�h ..S}vt (.fh �r. '.,IT4, r.t`k.,r r,r rv.p .,'.. 11�+ 7 c'i.t,^""riv �``i l? ;,..t:'�i{ Yei��7 R.FY1 j v.,•.y': .lk-Z i+r., ,r�,'ff;"�k t t �t yr' r- ♦ -t.4 °•1�1" '' +.,:ti.t � {1i...';`�{w." ii�.•:•t•J,1 +. %'it y t{^' ��' 1�' 1, 4 ..a �•� 5 l t�" �"1 4c` ♦+ .� , t,�1N �� ! �,•1i`M ( ` 5� .! tw'." ,.i '�yrt. ,l. 7 , f5 h 1 .t, 'il;t ul4 7 't1"", {r�k1 '! t t �rr r It.r •{(1 � � •ry1. d ,y,r� r A' j�� �{ ,+,}y4i w + � +}'4;.1 ky. �1�/Y7 rt` 1 X;ii�+ C � 4 ,.r +.-.. 1 'Gf't + �♦ i ! ,J*,yl 4, ,r r+ Sf.a ,r .1. F 4 ,•{4"7 \ Y( 1 / �� ,�1 •4Ai .oar {1 r .l l " Kl i4 � yy {{�, o.r, ,r r !fir „ �y � a. ••r 4 � it,`T,'r�(t:.,..r. ` �`, �` t r".t � '+Ilt lei 'i�' �ii:t, h I.i'• "F f M'j ,i Ir.C' Vr Y.y" �44-i�,, n r I ,. I h,.?;� f ( r � r 444,,, >� t it r At"�.;1 ��'r�• ��ti# ?. 1 r�i ralr l�tf �(11 �r1. t{tij �4 (fl».�7�i' ,�«,,at1+�t.,1 vir , ' , t ri t%-�, , r .+ 1f�".4• 'rl' h1�� I1j, ltf �; , t;r t.li,k 'F t iv ,+•.,�f ? 1 1 L ,..� .,r � "!!J" •f•ryi 4+ t �+ i • �M1 „1 `Y itr i. ( .. ' 1,. °t , 5 tLrR Ip'.. { vh r,.t t r1t 1 4 : t 1 "'f +ti» 1, i..+ '+�'+ 1 ci { � --. j 1 it i� tj C}, :�•I� �'; :. `�. . . � I � , •,� i� ��; i� tip; r 1 Ll , I �. IN , 1 , S�11 i I ..._._._ __.........._....-.. ( �.- i t ,. •1 I 1 r i `�� � ti, I j i N(rria, 'ro CIxuw To SCIIGUUi.F; PUBLIC III:ARTNC ITEM TO: CITY CLEWS OFFICE DATE: FROM: PLEASE S(:IIF:pUI.E A PUBLIC HEARING USING I'11F; ATTACHED LWAI. NOVICE FOR HF; )AY OF Ag AP's are attached �� " AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Cor.vr.is,iion Planning Uepnrtmeat i Petition * Appeal i Other ; Adoption of Envirotrmrcital Status (x) 1'Fti ICU Refer C:� s�,.Cl+� Pl.tnn— Iternrtmrnt - Extension �7 for additional infurtmitinn. If lr1ram, tr:imimlt exact wordini, to tit! rvgttirod in illy Irt;nl . t rc Lt , �i Iti TIM Superior Courf OF TILE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County cif Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH+ PLANNING PROOF OF PEMLICATION ............................ ......... ... Publ.ir,Nea.r.ln-±-No..,787B...... State of California lss. aTtBNt�fJtlfrf N County, Orange I NUMIt M 10.10UMY GIYRN"s Rita.J.r...P.ichter ... .................. ca.r.>wa'r. a t~ r]t/ w tt�aticylait Bork Cdt WV+ 6 the UR Pwroft of t=U40"SPIK+a ftO Pg. at Nn ra a b pp��ess.�tl aw suhiaal 60 That 1 any and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of the Z h hw 1 .ata.+wsem+W 1--- United States,over the age of twenty-cne years,and that 1 am not a �„"�`ISMM 8Q T �'mt party to,nor Interested In the above enfllbed:nailer;that 1 am the N" as 84- hl Wb et principal clerk of the printer of the tW Is WSW a ilo ON *I`W r'+rri Herd. nd LSr+fi+td A.v..+. A Drjlx tnwnt orray.b an ri4 is W Ht►nt +? #pit.. RA�b ..�ndeRenrf ent Ftev f ew ta.a lrrriae waf W 6W a% Mow a newspaper of general circulation,published in ite City of .�'rs�oP.0 Cluupbrn mb", eebr+0.M ttr C..uctf Hv7dmr. Ur"a.ct ...Hunt.itg.tan.Beat;h....... .......................... trt+crsa:: �tr..t. H�a►wrto+ AD tatrrnt.d WFnt♦ev Indt d to sumed aid ►anna rat **Poo ta.tr Crinlyof Orange and which newspaper is published for the dia- Ip aro.trwa aln.tt6.prop.wl8t seminatbon of local news and intelligence of a general character, ` nit)w n "tea IL/tArr ierartartfn.eyY i�sbtaiaet I and which newspaper at all limes herein mentioned had area stall from tkV Cet)Pimew pt+naur.aat W a bane fide rubacription list of paying subscribers,and which T+ AN7NtiteN4a s• newspaper has been established,printed and published at regular COMMMIMN arrr. Intervals In the said County of Orange far a period esceaiing one py"TAW.PAUH Year.that UW notice,of which the annexed is a printed copy,has Prh tACOM_ wr'ti been published Its the regular and entire Issue of said netittpaper, Hwut*wRwatarb and not in any supplement thereof,on the following dales,to wit: ..Novernbe r••23 Y-1978.... ........................... I certify tor,leclare 1 under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at .......... ..... ...�ard.en.,G,rOre t altforptit`�:. ?4t.h.day at...NoveAed 78 .......: gaily:..... . , .:IDY...C...... ><...... Signature toMNO car-Auer i a 157A52-'30 Jcseph D Kelly at al Spacial. Sign Pemdt 78-8 1320 Valley View j Bd Noveu b r 210, 1978 (JII) G1e mill aI Calif 91202 1.47-452.•31 159-111 1.2 ML&Ww Taniguchi eat al .Kathryn T Mad4illan at al 664 Taft Ct Beach Car Wash Mont erW Park, Calif %Paul Mai r-tta 91754 18976 Beach Blvd 157-452-34 Huntington Beach, Calif mw 92648 '3925 =richj, DriveStmti Calif 92649 157--452-35 1:9--161 23 George Buccol a Beach-Garfield Center 4501 Sirdi Street Buccola CD fooport Beach, Calif 4501 Birch Strut 92660 Newport Beach, Calif 92660 159-111 06 Dept, of transp=tatian Viola AbUren 120 So. Spring Street Dot Datsm JZa Los P.ngel:es, Calif 90052 18835 Beach JIM %ttn: Staff Assistant Beach, Calif 9264V t)Lsign B 159-Ul-07 Wayne M Q maau 18061 Beach Blvd Htintingm Beach, Calif 92648 159-111-08 Sidney A Crossley eat al 1055 low Aver Pfin Sptings, Calif 92262 759-111-31 Kathryn T MacMillan at al Union oil. Co of Calif Property Tax Divi.sirm I P.G. Baas 7609 ' lou Angeles, Calif 90054 ----- AIM Ad Fast Sign Coapany 157-452•-16 P.�i. Banc 791 Special Sign Permit 78-8 Erlancb F San MigwA cYyvr nbeac 21, 197Et (JIl) 17971 Iiallrroft Ijra 1 W. SaaramEnto, Calif llumttl� Beach, ta-lif 95691 92647 157-452-07 157-452-17 Me �� Cxm I?�y I0 'a 2uhut1x3din 4501 Beach Ubd Street James P Riley et 3aa a1 Newport i, Cal 23.17 Alabama Street Wast35861 aster,x Calif Cix e 92661 Ilun� Beach, Calif 9268 tipster, C 92648 92683 I 153-041-04 157-452-08 157-452-18 Berrie Young at al Garfield Prgxrticas- #16 Sookie Vartanian 17650 San kkwino Circle 8165 Dartmoor Drive on Street I! Fmmtain Valley, Calif Hwitingtio�n Beach, California Montaebellollo, Calif: t 92708 92646 90640 153-041-05 157-452--09 157-452-19 David R Xel].y at al Garfield Properties #15 Jinny Y Wong at al P.O. Box 550 8165 Dartmoor Drive 8601 Chukar Circle Huntington Beach, Calif HmtiNbcn Beach Calif Flountain Valley, Calif 92648 92646 92708 153-041-06 157-452-10 157-452--20 Carl R Steverson at al Janes P Riley at al Philip zisakis Wx Box 335 23.17 Alabama Street 16351 TUfts Lane H mtingtorn Beach, Calif Ihm 3ngto Beach, Calif Ih3nti.ngtan Beach, Calif 92648 92648 92647 157-452-03 157-452-3.1 157-452-22 Stanley W Schulte at al Fobett H Virdi Surinder K Bhatia at al 2825 Nuestra Lane 18901 ValleeeCircle 17531 Crown Circle F'allbrook, Calif Ihmtirgtan Beach, Calif Huntangtnn Beach, Calif 92028 92646 92649 22c 157-425-04 157-452-12 157-452-23 Hi.roschi D Hama et al Ernest A Reed at al Mazy G Skarstedt 8122 W3 ock Circle 16891 Vallee Circle 1025 Ijaysicle Cave Fast Ihmu"ftm Iieacx:, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Nes port Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92660 157-452-05 157-452-12 157-452-28 J Lary De Sham et al r,�aymand G Wilscui Jvty► J Ctirresl 5702 Serene Drive 9039 I1mm ,s Circle 2792 Vireo Circle Ih;nti.ngt= &-ach, Calif Fountain Valley, Calif: Costa Mesa, Calif 92649 92708 92626 157-452-06 357-452-15 157-452-:S roold Alvarez Acix t F Christie at al Gene R M:i s et: sill Ia592 Dawson Lane Willi mn Lenny 8 PaL.;n Ct MmUngtaon Inch, Calif 7231 Garden Grave Blvd. #K New o2.t Beach, Calif 92647 92641 92663 1 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 2000 Main Street - Huntington Beach, California 92648 Y VA- I HVTICS ur PUBLIC HL.WNr. !� APPI.AL TV rMtAL or SPCCIAL SIGs PEMIT 478-8 NVTICr IS 11rWHy MEN that a iLtli. hearing will ;,e hold Ly the City Council of the City of huntinytnn bascii, In the Lbuncil Chamber of tte Civic Nnter. Huntington lkach, at the hour of 700 P.M., or as Burro th.:tr- after as lossihle, on TueuAay, the 2nd ' day of .fanuAry, 1979. for t-he pur vain of conaidcriny an ap(r.al filed to the Planning Cor,relssion's denial of r Spacial sign Permit No. 78-8 to fvr- sit one additional fD sq. ft. free- etAniing rrmwent ajgn in an extnting shopping center presently having a maxlr m. square, footage of fraa-etanding signs. Ttw subject rhoryinp mriter is located at the northeast corner of Beach tilvd. and Garfield A%vnur. A legal "facrii'tion In an file in the Piarnit.g trpatLjmnt otfim. All irtntented lnrsonu ate invitr-' to tttand said henrtraq and expires their opinionn fnt ur agal.;st said aly.-.tl. Further lntotdatti'u may t`e r-btaitr,) fn/r tt,r tIfflr+- of tt-r Cft� Cie:k. 2eGO tram St trr-t, t1ty Ungtun 1-eai.h, ".A. 92Fi4H •• (714) '.16-572f.. Ual�d� 1:/1N/7U CITY or HIJNTINGWN UhCh By. Alicia M. ttentVarth City Clerk hub. 12/21/7P f t - Huntington Beach Independent i i w. 1 City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX iso CALIFORMIA etM OFFICE OF TIIE CITY CLERK { I January 4, 1979 Ad Fact Sign Company P. Q. Box 791 W. Sacramento, CA 95691 Gentlemen: City Council of the City of Huntington Beach a is regular The y 1 y H ng 8E. c t i a ar meeting 9 held Tuesday, January 2, 1979 denied your appeal to t0.4 Planning Commis- sion's denial of Special Sign Permit 078-8. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our office - 536-5M. Sincerely yours, Alic'la M. Wentworth City Clerk CC: Git,4-A�tomm-,y Straw Nat Pizza •� i. ..� . .+ .A. . . ... .. ,- . .. .. .•:L'i:.'SL, :j.';.r.'.tii{':T 4"'i»/(�J'��':irT,l�t 1 /0i Affidavit of Publication State of California County of Orange My of Huntington Beach George Farquhar, being duly sworn an or.th, mr;: That he is a (, citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. �7 That he Is the printer and publisher of the Iluntinstnn Beach News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- [\,fv !!shed In Huntington Beach, California and dreulated In the said AlyYr County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination }j'1 J4J of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been established, printed and published in the State of California, and County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication dat ervtedito the interest of, ls notice: and the said r published is the ntcrt inment o[any ;m,r is not Lltaiss,Hur,tlnytan,.itu,�ch.`Mrwli� iit particular clas% profession, trade, calling, race or denomination., or NOi1c QR'.>rNAl1C'�iclt:iKk , .. any number thereof. ARJ'ft. e I1HNtAl OF Tho Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a lmal neu311oper SPECIAL 'siCN MjilGi1'(/A.,.7M1 of general circulation by Judge G. V- Scovel in the Superior Court NOTICE IS fiERQa..GfVEtt;thet a,Qc ' of Orange County,C`allforttla August 27th,1937 by order No.A-5931, tic Counnecil of be Ctty of Nuntirs;tan of win br held by, the-City. 8earh, jIn the Cauncll chamfer 61, tho Civic APPEAL. TO DENIAL Or ►Cente, Huntington, Hra,4.'at, th,e Ihow ( That the — - of 790 P.M, or as.•soon,therexter..aj t poWbta,.on 140MAY• the s?ih I day of t APRIL, 1114 stir the purpose.`d corned• 3P OIAL 9It3N P,R�4'm zo 7 _ ulna a:, Appeal to a I�linnint Canmtee of which the snnexed is a punted copy, was published in said news- SIM denial of an applirA(on,for;the.NO ew tobllshmant of a n sicn-In vw-;ass the number of signs currently-petntitiz. Atlt3 >dBtlEl ; for a Commercial dictri.-t'frontate,'The paper at least subiec! property. •ir tocsted•; N: feat west of•bp addle sitreet.-ittB,sQut4 a( Idaroh �Ed,ngtr Aveltua In Vts'cz tt'rrrtmuttl commencing fivm the .� . day of f��lRty atstilti).: i A legal-dgerWon•is•Ott file;{a tt ilsnning.Wart.m tt,offleg ',.!I .;i 19-21L and ending on the.�.day of 14ar�h All tntercsted':.VRr36nA ate'lnrltad to !attend said hearint'ano wct rext-their Opinlons,fOr•ee•air, lit'aid Afpf L....• i� ,•' both days Inclusive, and as often during said period and Strom„ins;infa of ou,:ficli;�bc:,eik�'anx times of publication as said paper was regularly Issued, and in the #41,'street, f(tmtt6atOA_tieic►,1041itbtt regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not In a pis swe--•tnq swsM supplement, and said notice was published therein on the follordng iftWEat,9iaa/7a. , 'i.GN � HUNZ'tt'IGTO.�i. HtsJli:ti dates, to-wit: art, Nkla U. wtmt*vrtq , March 30,_ 1978 City.Cierk_ � P Usher ` Subscribed and sworn to before me this III I--day of Mnrrh, f3 rotary Public ,'� Orange County, California fj /f ' M �ll� t ' THOMAS D. WyLuE r !•.c y Nafaey Pub11C.Califarhla .t Orange C-s mfy i My commitsian E:pit+s +M... ........,.......t 1 t Katy of Ilan"gton of county Oxanor State ol i 'to f pitblicaliOl' Aff of GEORGE FP�AQ�HAR publisher' H untlnf;ion 4each N ` 018 k aril ' r @y� �F,u{y� Cle ,t.' � { - �' '} ty .n.• _ ems. - -- ' I • REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by Edward D. Selich Department Planning & Environmental Res. Date Prepared Aril_ 7 , 19 78 Backup Material Attached EJ Yes (] No Subject Arpeal on Special Sign Permit 78-2 .,SWC EdiWer_a_ni Springdale City Administrator's Comments 1 Approve as recommended. Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: CC,. r ` STATEMENT OF ISSUE Heath & Company has filed an appeal to Planning Commissi,on..deni.al-__ of 'Spi_cial Sign Permit 78--2 for installation of an additional monument sign at an existing commercial center. • RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommend that Council uphold Planning Commission denial of Special Sign Permit 78-2. ANALYSIS APPELLANT: Applicant APPLICANT: Heath & Company 3225 Lacy Street Los Angeles, California 90031 Winchell's Donut House P.U. Box 951 La Mirada, California 90637 LOCATION: 5942 Edinger, southwest corner of Edinger and Springdale REQUEST: Installation of an additional monument sign I i i .a� PIO W78 lob OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 1000 Main Street '".4"� Huntington Beach, Caliiornlag2fi48 II 41bua.tn 9 • I _ i r• ra•� ♦ III n J stl•linva- - ` '1 i � I f Published Huntington Reach News Mar. 1 30, 1973. NOTICZ OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO OENIAL Or SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT No. 792 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hub- lic hearinC will be held by the City r Council of the City of Huntington Beset., i in the Counc!I Chamber of 'he Civic j Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7s30 P.M.. or as soon thersaft►.r as j possible, on MONDAY the 17th day of f APRIL, 1978, fbr the purpose of ccnsid- j ering an appeal to a Planning Commis- sion denial co an applicatlon for the es- ! tablithment of a new sign In excess of the number of s'gns currently permitted i fcr a commercial district frontage. The sub)ect property Is located 270 feet west of Springdale Street and south of I Edinger Avenue in the C2 (Community (3usiness District). 1 A legal description Is on fllo in the Planning Department Office. ! All Interested persons are Invited to f attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said APPEAL. I Further information may be obtainer! ` from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 i Main Street. Huntington Beach, Callfor- We 92648 =- (714) 536-SM. DATEDs 3/:3/78. CITY OF iiUNTiNGTON BEACH j By: Alicia M. Wentworth ` City Clerk I I ! I i i I � r G 1 _ -_ Page Two PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON MARCH 7 , 1978: ON MOTION BY STERN AND SECOND BY NEWMAN SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. ! � 78-2 WAS DENIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: { � AYES: Slates, Stern, Finley, Shea, Newman, Hoffman NOES: None ABSENT: None DISCUSSION: Special Sign Permit 76-2 is a request to replace an existing free- standing sign on commercial frontage where there are already four other existing freestanding signs. There are 746.41 feet cf frontage for the commercial center which according to Section 9760. 7 (c) of the Sign Code is only sufficient for one freestanding sign. The Sign Code provides a nonconforming sign amortization schedule which directs that all existing signs made nonconforming by pro- visions of the sign code shall be amort-ized and removed by the cign owner after a change of use. Since the existing freestanding sign is nonconforming and the construction of the Winchell's Donut House constitutes a change of use, the amortization schedule applies in this case. The amortization schedule was developed specifically for cases such as the Winchell' s proposal in order to encourage homogeneous commercial signing and decrease the diversity of design and color themes in retail centers. Permitting the replacement of a nonconforming sign with another nonconforming sign is contrary to the explicit intent of the Sign Code and can only occur through the issuance of a special sign permit. In order to grant a special sign permit, four conditions must be met. in the opinion of the staff and the Planning Commission, the conditions have not been met by the pro- posal. Condition #1. Strict compliance with the sign code will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. The justification of economic hardship provided by the applicant (attached) does not demonstrate hardship. Furthermore wall signing with exterior illumination will provide identification for the donut house on the north, east and west facing walls. The donut house will be set back approximately 45 feet from the property line and will be readily visible from Edinger Avenue. Consequently, economic hardship associated with lack of visibility does not apply in this case. Page Three Condition #2. The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area: { The proposed monument sign is an improvement over the existing sign aesthetically and it would be a reduction in height from 27 feet to 12 feet. In addition, the proposed sign would not obstruct the visi- bility of other existing signs. However, the sign would increase # the diversity of signs in the center thereby further controvening , the intent of Lhe Sign Code to provide signing with common design and color themes. Condition U. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such sign: The proposed monument sign would have little effect on the surrounding land uses except to intensify the diversity of design and color themes in the center. Condition #4 . The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision: The proposed monument sign would not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. It would he approximately 75 feet west of the nearest driveway, approximately 3:35 feet east of the nearest westerly driveway and would be set back approximately 4.5 feet from the ( , property line. { ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Special Sign permits are categorically exempt from environmental i documentation. r FUNDING SOURCE Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS ' i . � Reverse Planning Commission action and approve Special Sign Permit 78-2 with appropriate findings. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1. Letter of Appeal 2. Area Map 3. Site Map 4. Staff Report Respectfully submitted, 1 612�ward el E Secretary 4 EDS:TJM:gc ��... _ ..�.'. ,...e,. --. ;. .. ... .. .. .. _.. . . ..._ .. .... .. .. .. .h:"i'.' e.;}... ;.,:are.•—� OEM : �G and-&Aw;.S �,o;A . A s r i DISTINCTIVE ELECTRICAL SIGNS STORE FRONT MODERNIZATION March 9, 1978 Honorable City Council 2000 Main Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: City Clerk Re: Winchell's Donut House 5942 Edinger Huntington Beach, CA Sign Permit #78-2 � . Gentle-men: Please accept this on behalf of Winchell's Donut House, as an appeal to the decision of your Planning Commission decision of March 7, 1978. Reasons are that a strict compliance with your sign code does create an economic hardship. A) As mentioned at the Planning Commission Hearing, persons desiring our service impulsively stop upon viewing our sign at the street. No matter how many times a person has been at such a place. there is a tendency for people to look for our street sign to give them precise location and time to safely and without causing any traffic hazard to enter our premises. B) Certainly we have a good product, and we receive repeat business, but the importance of that monument sign has been demonstrated many times. f 3225 LACY STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 00031 PHONE (210) 293.4141 .t.�.M ...... M R;;C:-�S Iri't'�tA �r�'rc�-rr.r;,,,t y..,•t...-.;y`; ....—... .���..r..-.:.:{•.yt •�..�. 1 t•L�`.,i1,,.^,._'r-';"..""'..r't.''Tx a �a13:1d REATH ama�aarq� Honorable City Council March 9, 1978 Page 2 C) In time, the trees in the parkway will obstruct visibility of our building. D) Mr. Orvel Fisher's letter appears to be one of traffic control and not as a protest to our business identification monument. E) Business signs are, in actuality, a part of the busineSLI just as the structure housing it. F) Proper identification, advertising and communication are vital to the success of the business no matter how popular they are. G) Without such identification, business diminishes. H) We are not creating any more of a proliferation of signs than is presently in existence. We are replacing a free- standing sign with a monumental one that enhances the area. I) Prosperity is beneficial not only to the businessman but to the City as well. It also creates more jobs . J) The public health, safety, and welfare will not be hampered nor will a nuisance or imperilment be created. K) We are substantially the same use as that prevailing. Please notify Mr. John Emanuelli of Winebell's Donut House as well as this writer tLe date said Public Hearing will take place. Respectfully , . E. Briesemeister EB:vgn cc: Mr. John Emanuelli Winchell's Donut House P. 0. Box 951 La Masada, CA 90637 l �" 3 . ti. r7;�=..�'",� •[ y t.T "�lIT t:. "a, ti ''� �'U t y' .0 {t SS Y , J. •t,� �,�;f�^�' f t,'l ,�(.` ,r L I'.'re� i.as:.1t; � i'•`: r yy t ' `{4.:',il't rYx ��� Y"�••�i t,..�t'�}--1'a,,f' �i2�`.:k1 t' I .:u's'x.: rt. t a. 1 • huntington bet punning department staff art— TO. planning Commission FROM: Planning Department DATE: March 7, 1978 ! SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 78-2 ACCEPTED: Jan. 30, 1978 APPLICANT• Heath & Co MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: 3225 Lacy St. April 5, 1978 Los Angeles, CA 90031 ZONE: C2 Winchell' s Donut House P.O. BOX 951 GENERAL PLAN: La Mirada, CA 90637 General Commercial LOCATION: 5942 Edinger, southwest LXZSTING_USE: corner of Edinger and Retail Center Springdale REQUEST: Installation of an i additional monument sign 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Deny Special Sign Permit 78-2 based on findings in Section 7.0. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit 78- 2 is a request to replace an existing freestanding _sign on commercial frontage where there are already four other existing freestari3i:ig s3,gns;�fiheJagplicant was idvise.d-by• -theHoard "of zoning Adjustments during processing .of Use-Permit No. 77--99 that application for a special sign permit would be necessary for the proposed free- standing sign. There are 746.41 feet of frontage for . the commercial center which according to Section 9760.7 (c) is only sufficient for one freestanding sign. The subject site is located southwest of the intersection of Edinger Avenue and Springdale Street just west of an e:isting service station. The proposed signing is for Winchell's Donuts which will occupy a structure in the existing parking lot and is set back approximately forty-five feet from Edinger Avenue. 3.0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The Commission when reviewing and analyzing special sign permits must con- sider and find the following conditions exist: (a) Strict compliance with the sign code will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant; and (b) The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area; and 1�� t' Special Sign Permit 79-2 Page Two (e) The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the prop,-!rty located in the vicinity of such sign; and (d) The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian ;end v ehiculkir tr.a l-IC vision. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Special Sign Permits are categorically exempt. (CEQA Section 15111 , Clafs II) 5.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, 'ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNA'TI ), The retail center in which the subject site is located is zoned C*' and is designated General Commercial in the General Plan. Property to the west and south is developed, zoned and General Planned low density residential. To the north across Edinger Avenue is Marina High School. To the east across Springdale Street is a service station zoned C2 and General Planned Commercial . A First Baptist Church is located south of the service station and is zoned R5 and General Planned General Commercial. 6.0 ANALYSIS: 1 The sign code provides a nonconforming sign amortization schcdulc: which directs that all existing signs made nonconforming by provisions of the sign code shall be amortized and removed by the sign owner ! after a change of use. rurthermore, the sign code provides that a nonconforming sign may not be changed to another nonconforming 5i-In. However, the Planning Commission may grant a special sign permit pro- viding for relief from the strict application of the sign code if the conditions listed in Section 3 .0 are found by the Planning Conanission to exist for the subject proposal. Condition #1. Strict compliance with the sign code will result- in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. The justification of economic hardship provided by the applicant (attached) does not demonstrate hardship. Furthermore wall signing with exterior illumination will provide identification for the donut � house on the north, east and west facing walls. The donut house will be set back approximately 45 feet from the property line and will be readily visible from Edinger Avenue. Consequently, economic hardship associated with lack of visibility does not apply in this c,as`. Condition #2. The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area: s i I , t M lilt I ` Special Sign Permit No. 78-2 't Page Three The proposed monument sign is an improvement over the existinq sign aesthetically and it would be a reduction in height from 27 fec t to 12 feet. In addition the proposed sign would not obstruct the visi- bility of other existing signs. However, the sign would increase the diversity of signs in the center thereby further controvening ;:he intent of the sign code to provide signing with common design and color themes . Condition 93. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such sign: The proposed monument sign would have little effect on the surrounding land uses except to intensify the diversity of design and color themes in the center. Condition ;1'4 . The proposed sign does not obstruct: pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision: The proposed monument sign would not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. It would be approximately 75 feet west of the nearest driveway, approximately 335 feet east of the nearest westerly drive- way and would be set back approximately 4 . 5 feet from the property line. 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS: Since not all of the necessary conditions for approval of a special sign permit have been met b the proposal, the staff recommends I "I g P Y P P � denial of Special Sign Permit No. 78 -2. TM:ja � Attachments: 1. Area Map 2. Site Plan 3. Letter from Orvel Fisher 4. Response to Orvel Fisher 5. Applicant justification i; 4 t - UK K WELDS CR C F-E {M+::' :Iiiu: SG"if0'_� .�. ROY►UST 1 CF-£ AL PH r, R TA O W .`e J �-- 0+1tDGC CZ CL J J 3 i C' 247.76 F. �''S6S ' EDINGER• AVE. l Sign Location i C21 11 _ f N1 �- Rya +� ;TLE o DR. R G2 ' 1000 SCALE IN MET M= F ul LITTLER` {i 5ti AD DR. 50FTWIND DR. ; z � z 1—H-k Z_ MONTECiTO DR. CLARK DR _ in • i w SPPCIAL SIGN PEPHI7 NO. 78-2 Zone C2 ►.u`sriCrar 81404 Ii��Tt:f;TL►:J ^CAM►I °Li.`.3{tic� ��PT. „� .� I • HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPT. Box 100 r Huntington Beach.CA 926481712 { ,�' � l fZ .c--�+-���� ._mac-..r�-��`�- - �'�•-,,,,,r.�;?—�./,�• 7 � v' f ` �� • mot_•• �vt- c� _�=`..-�.r ,..�...-.�c .c_--.:�._. •.�-�--�-.. �, 1 v e*-�i..✓� ve/ Feu.-e.c'i-1".. �i lr�-[. L;�,�•.�- t �,.�•� —•e.+ �1 �. ,c'i7 e�L G-�--�-� �..-•eye..L ��--,�.�� _ sw•.,...e i i' n � II � � v' .� �;�.�z•�-c� SAC! ti-�, ���/, 2��-� ..���1 3 I �I 1 � �I �Gv�-••�_� �_zif t,.�,,•!�.SKI--fir �j � ,,t,r�, C•L✓ • 1�,� t. --�-�'� �}/'..his-''��� � u`.t � f // � /J r 'y �, ♦ _ �_ � I.��V✓�.Y CC./✓ALL♦C.1T'�+t 'mil .�.�-�-:�'-� .•.• I i 1 ' 01� CITY OF HUn T ln (3 t On Bc- , , u �J DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES (7141 53G•5271 p, 0, BOX 100, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92G�16 i f1 March 1, 1978 Mr. Drvel Fisher 5742 Edinger Avenue Huntington Beach, California. 92647 Dear Mr. Fisher: Special Sign Permit 76-2, if approved, will permit Winchell' s Donut House to place a modest monument sign in front of their proposed establishment in the Marina Village Shopping Center. The sign would be a business identification sign and is not related to traffic control. Winchell's Donut House would be completely responsible for the cost of the sign. We have contacted the Traffic Division of the Public Works Department to inquire as to the feasibility of signalizing the intersection of Clubhouse Drive and Edinger Avenue, and we were informed that this intersection has a high priority among intersections needing signalization. We will forward your letter to the Planning Commission and to Public Works Department. A representative of the Traffic Division will be contacting you in the near future to provide you with more detailed information concerning the intersection of Clubhouse Drive and Edinger t Avenue. The arterials in and around the industrial area generally located north of Edinger Avenue, between. Bolsa Chica and Springdale Streets, have f you wish further information con- been designated as truck routes. I cerning truck routes in HuntingDerrickton of myach staffcatding 536-5278�er Avenue, please contact Mr. B�l Sincerely, Edward D. Selich Director EDS:BD:ja Ou I } 1�! MLTNI DISTINCTIVE ELECTRICAL SIGNS STORI. FRONT MODUnNIZATION i W+achell 's Donut House i 5942 Edinger Av. Huntington Beach, Co. ' Variance JUSTIFICATION r 1. A strict compliance with the sign ordinance results in a substantial economic hardship for the following reasons: (a) We are open 24 hours and must let the public know our precise location. (b) A huge investment is being expended and must be protected. This includes •; the demolishing the existing pole sign "Busy Roy Hamburger" and the building. (c) In place of the existing pole sign, we will place our standard monument sign. (d) We must maintain our public image with our National Registered Trade Mark sign. ' If not a pole sign then with a monument type sign. ! (e) Approval will allow us to provide employment .far ten full time persons and various part time persons. (f) Other centers much nearer in your city have severrl pule and or ground type c,igus in addition to the usual wall or building signs. 2. Our porposed sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area. We are replacing and installing a monument type sign i►elets of the existing pule slip, of approxintalely the same area but with an elevation substantially less in height (12' as opposed to 279 or 567. less height than that which exists. 3. The new sign will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties. (a) It will be beneficial. (b) Them will be no increase in the number of signs. (c) An enhancement will be ti►e result. (d) There will be no obstruction to fire fighting equipment nor to police surveillance.. , (e) It doesn't create a hazard due to collapse, fire, collision, decay or abandonment. (f) There will be no impedement to the free and uninterrupted passage of pedestrians t or vehicular traffic. (g) Traffic signals are not obstructed. 1 ' (h) In general, the public health, safety and welfare will be enhanced. (i) Except for a school to the north, we are surrounded by commercial endities. ► 4. Our monument sign will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. It will be 1 , 1 approximately 75 ft. west of the nearest driveway and approximately 335 ft. cast of the , 14 nearest westerly driveway. It will be setback approximately 4.5 ft. from the property line and wholly within a planter equal to a parking stall. Heatith Co. a by E. Brieseneister 3221S LACY STREET LOS ANGCLES, CALIFORNIA 00031 PHONE (213) 223.4141 � I I 9.1 771 Publish y .�/=�'t7a Postage PaiYos tcards .....:3:.� L NOTICE OF MTDLIC HEARING APPEAL TO DENIAL / OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT No. 78-2 NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the . City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Wintington Beach, at the hour of 7700 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible, on 140IWhY 107 the day of APPXL 1978 . for the purpose of considering an appeal to a Planning cormis3ion deniaalt of an application for the establishment of a new sign in excess of the numberAAsigns currently permitted for a '1 � comtmercial district frontage. The subject property is located 270 feat west of Springdale Street and south of Edinger Avenue in the C2 (Community Business District) . **A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office. i i All Interested perNana are invirt.,. ' to attend said hearing rnd express their opinions for or agaim lid __ _�bpr�►. Further information may be obtained fro.. Office of the laity Clark*, 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA lifornx- � 1H g - (714) 536-5226. DAM:_ 3/20/Za .,.....,�.,,.,,,,,.. CITY OF . TT1?Gi,TON REACH BY: Alicie �?dntworth City Cl. J 10 �_ Gt a. (i -FaR `� HR C5..2 0 CaN Sri , �rV"-3 ' hyr ,�5 C p� �trssra �. x. ntaJ O sc� �rC�t.'�'to� o ►� �� � ��rs��a '1 of a new sign in excess of the number signs currvioLly pullilit-L►:,i for a commercial district: frontage. The suLjeaL properL,}► is located 270 feet west of 5prinyd"le Street and south of Ldincak-'r 7 Avenue in the C2 (Community Business DistricAL) . A legal duSc ri; 001 is un file in the Planning Department: Office. f C� co a NOr[Cf: TO CLERY. TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM � .�Ctc, TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: �a ICG +Z G 15 7 p FROM: %owL M D PLEASE SCIIEDULE A PUBLIC HFJRTNG USING THE ATTArIIED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE �aDAY OF i�+ Q t t 197e. AP's are attached ✓ AP's will follow No AVs iI + Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) YES NO Refer to f �4- , Planning Department - Extension # C for additional Information. * If appeal, please transmit exact warding to he required in the legal . �ll a a I df 1-36-78 PMXP 2 146-262-10 146-13.?-7A r--- df; IW362-01 ' �' � 1 tc. 92641 ityb�et E, iii�an Avow S. jarg�WOV6 � �,, Q► 5751 ale vWM nriw. i S722 �vN Drive , L � Beach, CR 42649 ; i9►ntJngtbe► a4.ah. C7► 92619 � Ihrt.. , . ------------'�� 14F2+iF02____ _____.- _ - - 17i-112-Z1 df ; 146-262-1.1 TALS T. lknti� ' William J. 1�rke► ; Geicil 1lirrai^wra � n 9Z64'� 57d1 wnrmsn I�ciw 5361 Xwdlrarth L�rfve 16191 Nassau ram. 1An� • Ch 9%49 Huntington Beadh, CA 92649 ; IlMtirx�tcm 1lrc,'1, e..p g1.�.`19 146-112-22____..- ---- -- df: IN-•M"I df 146-262-12 J. SU%mn 5771 VMVIrm Give 1 57 !lore Cove 16192tLittle Drive ��, Ch 92649 I Dosch, Ch 92649 t#aYtinTtcn lMriCh, CA l2644 I ---------- -- --- ----- -T • --------- - - --- - -- - - : - - - - - - - - - - 14�i-7�12-13 df i 146-262-04 df. ; 146-4162-13 if lily' .T. dleasc ad I Jough 2. 1' w, N. i TAWM as N. rtbbity 5711 1'9ncmua nr'ive 57S2 PhraMar Drive 16172 Littler Drive Mm*irptrn amicho, CA 91649 1 mz*ljwtm beach, Ch 92649 ; 1#ntfmtrn ewach, Clk 92644 - ------- ------- --- ---- _ . . .. -----__ __ _ . _ _ _ - ' - - - - - - 146-112--25 df 146-262-05 df- 146-2k2-11- '1! i ,Yc n F... Dawlam R. S. Kirnick ' Lna rMO& O ' 16162 ldttlerr Drive Stadard Oil of CAlifcsnim : 5762 Mwgm Drive 42649 Yteaae�rty► TAX nivisim ; Mrtingtcxr mach. CR 92649 , Ihntinrrtrn 8oricfi, CZ 225�ftuh Stzeatt _ _ _-- -- ' _-__ _ --- -- _ _ - - - - - - - ' - 146-262-15 San f •1 f S *CLOW, Ch 94120 1 146--262- N df , ' t rttieet M. Ptiak*U ' UAIla Jackman 16131 Nuevo Lair 16142 Littlnir Drive Hun tkvgtm beact, Ch 92949 ; ilia tal [f fi. CA 92649 14F111-26-- _-.._ _-_--- 1# i14F262-O? -----_____ _- df 1jG-262-15 - - - - _ elf. 1oxtingtm V111age dh*pi.nq i l'lray L. Amber i Mi hml 0. Takft= Centar 1116141 Nmmu a : 16137 Lit tlor Drive utJ Pacific Sos�t Aaalty i Lan Hmti.rrVtm Bauchi Ch 92641) IA:nttngtan Bm-ch, Ch 92649 Attn: F. J. Klein 062 _ _ _ 333 South � St.-IN-12-2 - - : 146-262-06------- --- - - - df'o 146-2762-17 df Lor1 JMmpler■, C11 90017 i f edm ick J. bee'ttRat'dt , Trhart G. At)rAn@M , 16151 Name= Lartie 15731 Littler Drive j tMtirytoR "ar:h, tk 9,,549 ; jLmtinrtr n Beach, Ch 92649 -i14r"71;2-A4 ~ - -- -- - - - - -df ' 146-36:-18 �lF "Mt.il-jun Vium" ;'kqppirg iea to ► J. Srtsjteer it Marau*t T"I Oert w 1116161 Neeran Tana 15721 Littler Drive 9693 talahim Boole and ,i4tntirxrbon beach, Ch 92FA9 l kmtisv Mm Bomch, Ch 92649 Beverly Sills, Ck Q0211 - - - - -----•- ----- - - -- - ---'--- -- -- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -� i SPRtUL 91011 PERMIV 72-2 ------------ - dt 146-11.2-0.7 dfi 146-112-11 df WUxtmIIL s angst tame ,906Yf terse Ls !#Ln7de, 1 Berry KMbow P.O. =d t C C31 , S772 BIUVW �a ' 5771 Castle Give � Ili, ok 92649 i Iktntington Br 1-, Ch 92649 ---------------------- L - -- - - - - .- - - - - - - - - • dt W-1.13-02 df: 146-112-12 df i 1 "th i Co. I Nich"I 1. Daym ; Via as V. %mrku, et al 3225 Lwy Sttaeet 5762 ddindc 1 umm I 1500 Adrne Avenues, Suite 206 tas Art aun, C21 9ds31 , MMtingtM 9w 91', C R 92649 ' 000A NMI, C h 97626 I ' --------------------- -,- _ --+- - d!I 14i'-ll?-0i - - df; 146-112-13 df Met vanI DwAdd M. ftiUW Cliffksd A. I+Iva d693�re laws ' 301 8a�tdh VSaba Del Cam 5772 Castle Aries Mreicly stills, Cal 90211 i Anlehi+es, C R 92W7 1 ltu*i*wnm l�rfi,A 92649 - - -- ------ --- -------� 146-112-dS-- --_---- -- - - �I 146•-112-1+ - elf howit1x0 South � 1.'t tin 19try J. mp.j ift* P. -MLe ty $742 lldirtgw hvuvm 5762 Castle llarive LLosr, Q1 90052 Mntingtm D@wKh, CR 92649 ' lktntirultnn &ache CA 93649 1 - ------------- -- ------------ - ------ ----- -- -- - - 145�lZ-24,Y'.i d� 146-112-W dfi 146-112-15 df Mrs tt ghter rive, et Ad M46 J. Asada Rovoth H. ' mw� Mos7t C>rx'poretiast $732 ldingee >h�r ; 5752 Castle Aries P.O. am a S3 77i01 ' !wtl�rvWtcn , C:h 92649 lkmtirsstm DrAKt, Ca► 92fri9 H pt► 7 _ _ 141r492'-38 ------------- -fit; 1K�11?-07r- ---__-__-- dfi 116-112-16 - - - . . . . _ . . . df Shsr�9lMrtsz>7 li nterprises, et al i Lester & Mm ' Hillard P. Mach 1001 A mm of the Stan ' 5731 Castle Drive i 5742 Cantle Drive quits 605 i lmtingtan ll edh, C1 92649 ' IKSMiMtan meet-, C21► 92649 Los Argal . C h 90067 II,14S-Of1-02 elfi 146-112-0e ------------ -8f i 116-112-17 » _ df lkmtbgbnn beach lhi-n Righ amm *MAW" Jae A, thnim &*teal District 15741 Cootl a Rive ; 5732 Cantle thrive 1"; 17th Street ' Huntltwb n Bradt, C h 92649 I Ikmt.irx bm Beach, CA 92649 1luntirtgtm dreh, Cal 926487 ---------- ---- -__---dtl_l�i-112-0! -_-_--- - -_ _- df ' 146-112-1e- - - - - . . . . . . . . df fkDistrLot ty ?"lei C ontrol i Micttssl M. Gmt i P.Q. >k'ac 1070 ; 5751 Ct�stla Drinwe 1 Hubert L. I.rme I � itwtt6t, C71 l2619 5731 t'e+rxmen Drive Septa Am, CA 92702 I ; lkmtirtgtrn Akin, CA 92649 _�-- ----- - - • -- - - - - - - - - - l/�lla-41 ---_-_-___ __- -dfi IWL1&'%-10 df , 126-112-19 df Prv1 C wIms 1L 131tcholl ' willia n R. Ault 6719 SaftJt PUpm m I S761 Castle Drive i $741 ftvgz% n tvive Lis An"I", C R 90003 i DWWJjwbm llesri`i, CA 92649 1 Htnti ntan &Nch, Cif 92649 1 ' T — — ——— — ——— — -— — — — — — — —— — — I ' 1 ' I 1 1 1 ---'..•• .. -. - -.�� .. ,-.. ._ ... ._. .. . - __.... . . .. ... .! :'.. .. .._ _ . ma's•.... .. - — 90 Ill~-2 df 1+•V--7i- -ftom_3.of �- - - - 1--- ----- - - ' 14i►-2i�-Ol df 146-261-10 146--264-03 -df Joe ]ream, Jr. lrwm A. Artmld, art al 16112 lrsu Larw , S071 BrAd Drive ' 16172 liisseu We lkVtjrmjton ftec1, CA 92fi49 1 Mmtin#m ftsch, CM 92649 i 1Wtirgton Ek+i■C'i, :J1 42649 ------- --------- --------r_-- - - • - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . 1416-263-02 df ; 146•-26 u at ' 146-264-04 df i1i11LMa J. +� i MRltrsrsba , rot al , 16122 l mom Lf ,ail d five,• 16191 ri!a• �L� llumt.iartt+on Beach. C1 92649 , Hurc�i tlrir�� CA 9:6�9 ' �Y _________-__�_�_ ___ ; ` a 92649146-263.03 df 1 14i-N►}-12 df 146-264-05 df ltl*md M. 1pciwm Rldared L. lydth ' Cety H. mwwumd 5792 grow nriw ; Sd91 5krac�dw 16171 t�uirway► LAM "untlmftm Mench, C1 92649 1 Pmtingtm Is CM 92649 lMtinrtbon la mch, Cl 92649 ---------------------- ---- - ---------_- - _ -_ __ _ _�- __-_ _ _ - - MW263-04 elf , 146-263-13 df , 146-264-(b df O&MId W. :Uml ' 1 M, PUMM i C1arins SuIr . at al Wl s o" nriv�e 116 42 C7tippw Lne ' 16161 ttirmy Lore Ibjntbvjtm Dosch, CA 92649 Hmtir=Um 9socfi, C1 9264') Ikmtincttm FA mrh, CA 92649 � i _____..____ ---_.._____�..____-_-_ - -- -- --- -- -- - - , _ - - - _ . . . ._ a 146-263-OS df � M-261-14 df � 14i:i►4--07 cif t7OOL1 l V. lksiell E&wd J. Pamp As ; Yomy n wier 5821 grand rarive ; 16152 CKL"■c fine , 16151 Fair ny Lam NmtinWbm Daach, CA 92649 1 Hunk ftwoh, 0% 92649 "wtincftn lkmw:h, C1 92649 _` _ ' r. 1�16-2i'�-06--'--------- - c!f 14�6-2b3-15� - _ - - - - - - - ai"i 146-215''r-Al- ' - - - . . . df San '1'zmto, et al i taim A. tail. i Wwa %. HtVmImr 5831 grand Drive 16162 Chipper Lone ; 16152 fy►irmay taro lM*inqton Bench, C R 92649 , Minio gUm besoh, C! 92649 , Mntiitre n Hswd , C1 92649 - ----- - - ---- ------ ---r--- --------- ----- -- - - -'- - - - - - - - - 146-2631-07 df' 146-263-16 df 146-265-02 df .tool E. OULM tx rr'y ' tmttwmv + fropwtim, Inc. ' Cliffcud Ord 5841 9 1 - - Drive i c/o Jeftwum, Fred W. i 16162 Fairway txw Hmor qtm &wick, C1 42649 15761 gavolftir'st Street IMutiL-,gton nood , C1 92649 146-263-0t df,wIW264-�01- ______--- - - df i -146-265-03- - - - - df Marlin J. Knol lon lir*wt P. fe" i mu t in E. I kxnw 5851 Sabel Drivw r 16152 Noma Lome ' 16172 Fatrwmy► Lane lbz*Jngmn Beach, Ch 2%49 NM*Inqum Heach, M 92649 ; llunt1mrton CA 92649 14+6-2i3-fl!-------- ---- - d f; 146-264-02 _ ___ '- - - - - - -dt : 14ri-M-04 PWrdRrD C. llarrara hm;wt F. Calrlwnm Ridvurl F. Rd nom SAKI snood Drive , 16162 Nrerran Lane 16171 Mit4w um � Mmtingocn Dosch, C1 92649 MattSn-bm bkch, C+ 92649 lhat*irvMm Bosch, Cal 42649 1 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 146-263-11 Walter Saka, et a1 580.1 Snead Drive liuntington Beach, CA 52649 i 1 fSP-7♦2 dt it 1 1 30-71 tqn 4 O! , 1 14i-26"s 4fI ; 146-r.03-30 _ -df w df 14i-50 A. •. .lewww 60 i AweM-iaboN i Rat A . m war to � Fay E• Yar%U 10%7 1wtUW florid : 6021 aottldrA Drive 1 6051 Mantrcito E ive us 90064 1 fMottlhgtcr► f , Cat q�7 i Htwntinr t itwaerJt, C71 92647 . _-,-------------------�___-_-__---- -_ _ __ _ _ - - - -L - - - - - _ __ _ . • c'df 146-502-03 df i 146-503-11 dt Low i L wfu P.. Sawa i L10" R. Hu1 ISM [ldyFw LWW 1 6031 Awo!bda Drive 6031 t4wawMtacito Drive DwhCho C h 92649 RkmtI-'4*,awxt - wh, C% 92*147 w MntkiatM L3t%mCh, CM 9tf47 i6-SAl-dI df 14i-502-04 ______-_ __.- - d! ; 146-511-01 - - df Meriwart A. fthy Omwrulwd a. go ftdw ; mot sptl.>~t Ca wmh of tmnt- 16111 IMhIllwiwr Igor , 6"1 W Drive ingt m AlL p iMint4wrrytlan f ech, Ca► 92469 %*Lbrtnwm !l�ewwrdt w , to 92647 52'S2 PMbWweer Aw�ena ________- --___-_ -___ �_ ___- ___-__ --_-- - _ - _ _ - _ ltwurttitrttrst-tMtwwwr<ft, ('A` 92467 + 146-SOI-02 dt,' 146-502-0S df ,-146-p11-04 di 113M Id R. f wgrf i f6t"!lsat R. 1Cnpdnoms Alien $. Cmm. at al f 16161 1Mw lw Lane 1 6061 fAtebdAd Drive ; Min D. Dwakw►or l HmtLnwtcm 9mach, Ch 92649 ; Biro uin loom t , CPk 92647 1 16011 Swta butam Lem r<11Mvyc'h, (71 92649 ------ -------- ----- ------------ - - - Iltwe'Itiw>tnt> - 146-501-01 df 14dr502-1i d! ; 146 df Toast m 0. Cirirrww+rr w ' fGeawth L. ewoAArth ; ClatmV 0. M d 161S1 Nglar Low 6071 sceb" tarsim 1 % Baer. inc. !H►rtttLtlgt+aet Awewedt, CR 926" ffatt inptm se11*, CA 92647 P.O. Dlarwc 733 1 - --- ----- -- - -------'------ - S.wn t�lw ex 92112 14i-'S�f1•-03 If,' 14fr-S03-Ol ---"__. ..__-- defy 1 14(r-S11-15- - - df ftv@ecir* M. fsridwst i *mum M. wxru i Wilfred R. Chun, et al 16171 hwler Lern ' 11323 Jibrr o 9"not ; FM2 Ent f7diMw Avwwtria HwwmwtLrsgtrn Hewed o C h 92649 j Cerritos,os, Ck 90701 1 !#nti,rgten howl wl , CA 92647 1 1 -- ----- -------------- ------------------ -- ---r_------ --- -- - - - _ • • - _ 1W501-05w df 146-503-02 dt ; 1%-511--12 df sort S. lllewlkftmm Phil N. 9hrrrewo to at awl ; Lnelplighter kwtnmta 16201 A Adair horde 1 6OW 90fttl W T1'ive 1 SS40 F2 t 2it[l Stzw.t Mmtiwrn!jm tlew dt- C K 92649 9j*itti tm fteredt, CA 92647 ; t"q ftach, Ck 9MOI 146r'301-pi ----------' dfi 116-303-03 ------------- i _ _- - -- -- -- - - - - - - . - . • - - . 1 1 jm o tt. Cirirr 1 Reprad J. MLnd ' 146-.'be-lu 16211 Apw bw Lawn 6062 &A%N rtd Drive Mm t.irwww!l m li m 12649 , mat bmdt. CA 92647 1 1 1 -w--- i 06-SwOZ-Ol - ------------ dfi 14�503`-29 -- - - -- - - -- - - -a�y-- lab-;�f,.:-W . . . . Muo Pb cd fttru* J. taOw cnitL kub.+rL C. buchann.in 6001 s aftw td Drive 1 6061 Matb cito Dizv% 1 14171.;u%sau Lana HMtLMMM &UKAI. CK 92647 "mtingtm boawdt, tat 92647 liuntirytun Beach, LA 2649 1 � w w 1 + 1 � 1 1 1 1 City �of Huntington Beach P.O. SOX t!0 CALIFORNIA 926" o>aFlcE of •rIII: ecru (:I.I:ItIC � March 10, 1978 , Heath and Company 3225 Lacy Street Los Angeles, CA 90031 Attention: B. griesaemaister Gentlemen: This office has received your appeal filed to the Planning Commisssluu':s denial of Sign Permit #78-2. It is necessary that you submit a $75.00 check, paya*- •.o the: City of Huntington Beach, to complete the appeal procedures. This check rius:t � be received by the appeal deadline period which is Friday, March 17, 1970. I. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact this, office - (714) 536-5226. Sincerely yours, E t Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Attachment: Copy of 3/9/78 appeal letter cc: Mr. John Mwnuelli Winchell's Donut House P.U. Box 951 La Mirada, CA 90637 i +'ti.';, i'• :7'j�•"?. .'i ,., —. l _._ .... _ a-:......»r :t:a<....�T,, c•r_:<i..�, s Ja !► City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 1g0 CALIFORNIA MMi OFFICE: OF THE CITY CLERK May 4, 1978 Beath & Company s 3225 Lacy Street Los Angeles, California 90031 Gentlecl8rt t The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at Its regular meting held Monday, May 1, 1978, denied your appeal to thtdenial by the Plan- ning Comission of "Special Sign Permit No. 78-2, i1the sign was in excess of the number of signs currently permitted for a caaiawrcial district frontage. 1, Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW1bt t CC1 Mr. John ftanuelli = Winchell's Donut House La Mirada, California '0637 r: f ® 0"s Affidavit of Publication r�, ' �Ix•l. cul..� State of California ��1t' County of Orange ss .79' . City of Huntington ]:teach George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. Clrl-c That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach Ric News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- lished In Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the disw.nination of local and other news of a general character,and has a bona fide taubt►st,sd FluritttsrSon..tNirrrt�!�!tty;. subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been established, printed and published in the State of California, and ��'�.• jrau. County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication1t of the first Insertion of this notice; and the said newsp aper is not i4th srIMSM,twrld by thr devoted to the Interest of, or published for the entertainment of any �'"ttto, particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or C M. at.the It ber thereot any ThemHuntingtoa Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspapertt f �YtAr tt►'drr of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court �t►M, of OwaM County, California August 27th,iL437 by order No.A-5931. s ,a"` � il ijAW..at••`trait••.sty. That the MAL TO DENTAL QE WALL SIGN of which the o unexed is a printed ropy, was published in said new.4- �+ �. ��• , ice,�; r4,7,rr� POP" at least one issue commencing from the . 5th ._ day of January 19_Z., and ending on the _Jlh _ day of Jan jtar 19-2B , both days inclusive, and as often during said period and 1} times, of pubUmtion as said paper was regularly Issued, and in the regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not In a supplement, ann said notice was published therein on the following dates, to-wit: Jan, 5 . 1978 I _\PPROVLD Y— +CITY COUNCIL ublisher Subscribed and swo.m to before me this 6th day of CITY CLERK January 19 ob- - Notary Public Orange County, California ................................ .............................r� V THOMAS D. WYLLIE I '1 _ j Notary rabic-C,r,FaY.ta ' = Or@"* Cove; Wl Gwwiniela Es .4 NM w r�.r.-..r....-.�.,• 1 City of Huntington Reach � `•a'.e" County of grange ' r State of California .RF �'l tZ'fil f t 0 fjj}►.�Zl�'�f L`tl t C}Il 4dt C. Y of GEORGE FARQUHAR Publisher Huntington,.Beach News Filed ; Clerk t r-' Deputy Clark .F , . ♦ S � ' { City of Huntington Beach P.O. sox if6 CALIFORNIA SUM -+ OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Junuarr 17, 1979 Res. J t ob Peterman � 7561 i!,.nter Drive Puntiniton Beach, California 92647 V&ar pies. Petermant The City Cni:•ril of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting hold Honda ;anuary 16, 1976, granted the appeal which you had filed ;.o the Pla ':g Comission's dental of your proposed wall sign - Planned Sign Progra.• 477-3. Please contact: the Planning Department for further information. Sincerely Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk � ! AMW:bt I .. ...., , _.. ... _.. .- - f • n r gyp( ... ..{. ;f •. .1 1 • '- .. -R..." .:L....i�l.(..._.....w2l..iJ.:l.Y xrci.tlR...�.:�Y.M1."SO"M�iirf 7"!:'7,�1 1 � D OP 9�8 • Huntington Beach Planning Comtnissio �Z/yriy�ro N ' P.O. gpx 190 CALIFORNIA 9Y6+18 re 0�cer, CF TO: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator FROM: Planning Commission DATE: January 16, 1978 RE: Appeal to Planning Commission's Denial of a Wall .Sign proposed as past of Planned Sign Program No. 77-3 APPELLANT: Mrs. Jacob Peterman 7561 Center Drive Huntington Beach, California 92647 LOCATION: 7561 Center Drive, approximately 540 feet east of Gothard Street in the North Huntington Center Specific Plan REQUEST: To permit the placement of a wall sign approximately 25 square feet in area for a liquor store upon the southerly face of the eastern most building facing Center Drive within the Old World Village. PLANNING COVAISSION ACTION: A MOTION BY SHEA AND SECOND BY SLATES TO APPROVE THE WALL SIGN FAILED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shea NOES: Stern, Finley, Slates, Newman, Hoffman ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY STERN AND SECOND BY FINLEY, THE APPEAL TO THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT DENIAL OF THE LIQUOR STORE WALL SIGN WAS DENIED BY THE F►lLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Stern, Finley, Slates, Newman, Hoffman NOES: Shea ABSENT: None FINDING: The proposed wall sign facing Center Drive is not in keeping with the previously stated nature of the Old tvarld Village; that of attracting patrons to the Center and not individual business solicitation. Approval of said sign would set an undesirable precedent and foster subsequent requests for individual sign exposure from other tenants within the complex. PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deny the proposed wall sign based upon the Planning Commission's findings. i Page Two SUMMARY ANALYSIS: Th:: subject sign proposed for inclusion within the overall sign program (Planned Sign Program No. 77-3) for the Old World 1'411age was originally disapproved by the Planning Department_. The wall .-iqn was among three signs which were not included in the approved planned sign program and were subsequently appealed to the Planning Commission. A description of the total planned sign program is provided in the December 20, 1977 staff report to the Planning Commission. The primary concern of both Planning Department and Planning Commission regarding the proposed wall sign centered on the thought that if any business within the Old World Village complex were to be granted separate identification on the exterior of the site as is proposed in this one particular instance, other businesses in the complex would eventually request sign exposure from the street. Therefore, approval of one tenant sign from the exterior side where other individual shops do not have such exposure would set an inequitable precedent. This concern is magnified in respect to the tenants whose buildings abut Center Drive in a similar manner as the liquor store. - A total of six tenants are situated with exposure to Center Drive, however, those stores have been limited to inward sign exposure only. As an alternative to separate identification for one particular use, the staff advised the developer that it would consider a tenant reader board which could be designed in a European architectural style to impart in- formation as to what businesses exist in the complex as a whole. However, the developer did not agree to this approach. The appellant has stated that a3equate exposure of the liquor store to the interior is not possible as the Qntry is situated on a side walkway as opposed to the majority of stores facing the main interior circulation system. In its original assessment of the planned sign program, the Planning Department fell: that other buildings within the complex were similarly situated. Insofar as the liquor store building abuts both a-. I main parking lot and a pedestrian entry, adequate exposure through the use of tenant identification signs is achieved. The liquor store presently has two tenant identification signs allocated to it with one being affixed on the westerly side of the building facing the parking lot and one being located next to the pedestrian entry from Center Drive. A composite drawing of building locations and approved signs for the liquor store is attached for the City Council's information. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On-premise signs are categorically exempt (Clss 5) from the requirements for environmental documentation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. I I • Page Three I SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Letter of Appeal 2. 12/20/77 Staff Report 3. Composite Building and Sign Locat..on Map 4 . Proposed Wall Sign Respectfully submitted, Edward D. Selich Secretary EDS:DE:gc r' i { E ....a• ....'�.•. .c. ....; -, '.r Y. ._... .. .. .. ,. ..._.....'i'.. .. .: _- _..-o.1 f17�w::.:.i >wa t.Y,�'Y's,'I?,T'.'�- :. t 1 December 21, 1977 1 City Clerk Huntingtor. Beach City Hall I would like to appeal the Planning Commission's denial of Planned Sign Program 77-31 specifically the Liquor Store Sign. The two reasons for denial were. 1. The City doesn't need another liquor store sign. 2) In allowing this sign, other store owners (facing Center Dr.) may request one in the future. My reasons for needing a sign are as follows% 1. The six other stores face inward and are on the path of foot traffic. Our store neither faces Center Drive, nor inward. Our two doors are located at either side of the building. 2. There is nothing to identify our store as a liquor store. There are nct the usual front glass windows that usually identify a liquor store. 3. A liquor store does most of their business in the evening hours. The two signs we have are all metal, painted sigh and Cannot be identified at night. 4. The average tourist will not be going to buy liquor at. this 9 g Y q type of unique village, therefore, we will need street business to survive. 5. The developer, speaking to the Planning Commission has assured them he will not allow any more signs in the village. Our build- ing is unique because of reason $1. In conclusion, I would like to say that without a sign, our building being the first one located on the corner, looks like a residential home. We need a sign and are willing to negotiate the size. It is designed in good taste complimenting the Old World decor. Thank vou. Mrs. Jacob Peterman (Original signed by Mrs. Jacob Peterman) i r r-1 21 RII a . 5 9 ' WV '�C� ��� � �C/r�j�Ly.t.��• �-L�� �/����G�`.�d G�1 1 C7�`JlI!i[t�.•d1I ��LG�� ._.i��•CrL�Z�dr./G+�'-��-- ,� -t d»L. �� � �/� -E' !-�B.c.�� � G'Y i CAI Z.t�•' � �"L� _,��� � ��•'.1 �� �t.-�'G't�t /�c��i'.�..•�+7G..� �trL"" w eo- _� �[.L<'Z- ,l�G� :.'1�e�7...y . .� •,1 � ��.. sC�d�c�f�uJ �c�.�,._ r O �� ��_' �J-"�''!l!LB-C-J� 1/!�-tt-c- _�.P_ .•11a�� �t'X� �!.-�� __l'-�"�-C�- I i _�-2� �l t3 �,L'"-6-�—LJ �it.C..-- ���Grt���'- Ct--� _L�-��/'-•�'�--� ----- - 0.rye _. Zb Ice -V; e j huntington beck.' pkmning dWartment staff -JP®11 70: Planning Cmmission FROM: Planning Department DATE: Decwber 20, 1977 pU,%a= SIGN PROGP M 77=3 - APPEAL Applicant & Heath and CaTpany and DATE FILED: II/An7 Appellant: West Coast Soccer League MANDAZORY PROCESSING DATE: 2/17/78 3325 Lacy Street Las Angeles, California 90031 ZONE: North Huntington Center ice,-uesti: An appeal to the Planning Specific Plan Department's denial of three (3) GENERAL PLAN: Mixed Development proposed signs of an approved planned sign program. Location: The Old World eamercial ompler, located on the north side of Center Drive, approximately 650 ft. east of Gothard Street. 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Deny the subject signs which were not included in the planned .sign program for the Old World complex based on findings in Section 5. 0 of the staff report. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: The proposed planned sign program for the Old 'World commercial/residential complex was conditionally approved by the Planning Department on October 28, 1977. The sign program primarily consisted of a number of signs identifying tenants and street names of the village theme center, all of which are to be inwardly oriented and not substantially visible from public rights-of-way. The program also consisted of six exterior signs, of which three were approved and three were denied. The exterior signs include: 1. One pedestal mounted free standing sign, a half sphere sign, depicting greater Europe with the lettering "Old World" upon the sphere. This sign would not exceed 60 sq. ft. or a height of 1 1 • PSP 77-3 APPEAL Page 2 I 3.0 ft. and would be locates on the southwest corner of the subject property. 2. A wall sign one-half sphere in shape mounted on the mountain feature at the intersection of Center Drive and Huntington Village Road bordering the easterly property line. The sign is to have the same area and configuration as the above mentioned sign. 3. A wall sign depicting the letters "Old World" placed on the mountain feature adjacent to the beer garden abutting Huntington Village Road on the easterly portion of the property. This sign would contain lettering not exceeding 36 inches in height. 4 . (Disapproved sign ) A "Festival Dancers" feature (life size figurine) proposed in a free standing position on top of a mountain feature facing Center Drive. The '. proposed sign is approximately 5 ft. 5 in. in height (16 ft. in overall from ground level) and 20 sq. ft. in area. This sign presently exists in the field. 5. (Disapproved sign) An open framed sphere to be placed in a free standing position on top of a mountain feature facing Center Drive. The proposed sign is approximately 46 ft. in height from ground level and is approximately 100 sq. ft. in area, 6. (Disapproved sign) A liquor store wall sign approximately 25 sq. ft. in area which is proposed to be placed on the south face of the westernmost building adjacent to Center Drive. Schemiatic drawings of the signs and their Proposed locations ana the Planning Department's approval letter for the Old World planned sign program is attached for th)n Planning Commission's information. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On premise signs are categorically exempt (Class V) from the requirements for environmental documentation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 4.0 PRESENT LAND USE ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The subject property is developed as a specialty commercial condominium complex with dwelling units above each store located within the North Huntington Center Specific Plan. Property to the north is developed as I � k, an apartment complex also within the Specific Plan area. PSP 77-3 - APPEAL Page 3 Property to the east is presently vacant but is included in an approved Conditional Use Permit within the Specific Plan area to be developed with specialty commercial uses, high rise offices, theatres, and a hotel complex. The aforementioned area is located within a mixed development desig- nation in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Huntington Center exists to the south of the subject property within a C2, Commercial/ Community Business District. A Southern California Edison Company easement and the Southern Pacific railroad right-of-way exists to the west of the subject property in an R1, low density residential, district. 5.0 ANALYSIS : As the Old World commercial/residential complex poses a somewhat unique form of land use, the developer has pursued a planned sign program to achieve his desired marketing approach. The planned sign program provisions allow for variations to the minimum requirements of the sign code. The intent of the planned sign program is to "encourage incentive and latitude in order to achieve coordination and good design of sign related uses. It is not intended to circumvent any of the objectives (of the sign code) . " The overall sign program as approved by the Planning Department provides for center identification at either end of the property along Center Drive and along Huntington Village Road bordering the eastern side of the property. The globe feature and the festival dancers feature were thought to be excessive and . would not further the objectives of the planned sign program approach. The liquor store wall sign was disapproved primarily as this proposal was not in keeping with the previously stated nature of the Old World Village; that of attracting patrons to the center and not individual • business solicitation. Additionally, it was thought that if any business within the complex were to be granted separate identification on the exterior of the site as is proposed by the liquor storey other' businesses in the complex would request request individual sign exposure from the stceet. Therefore approval of one tenant sign from the exterior where other individual signs face inward would set an undesirable precedent. This concern is magnified in respect to the tenants whose buildings abut Center Drive. A total of six tenants are situated with similar exposure as the liquor store from Center Drive. As an alternative to separate identification for one particular use the staff advised the developer that it would consider_a...te.nant _reader___. board %4hii: could 'be''designed.:in .a .Eurppean'_.axchitectural _stylerto. impart . information as to what businesses exist_ in_.the__complex as a whoThs_ _ � eveop� r.did not agree to this approach. f 1 PSP 77-3 APPEAL Page 4 The developer made mention of the fact that all signs which were proposed would be the only signs that would ever be placed within the a complex and is limited appropriately in the CC&R's for the owners ' association. Limitations in the CC&R's provide no assurances to the City that the number of signs will be limited. Therefore there is a need to address a limitation in the planned sign program. I 6.0 RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the :Foregoing analysis, the Planning Department recommends denial of the three exterior mounted signs at issue for the following reasons: 1. The globe and festival dancer features exceed reasonable signing exposure and therefore, does not-further, the objectives of the sign 'cade. 2. The exterior facing signs offer adequate exposure for identifying the center. 3. The liquor ntore wall sign facing Center Drive is not in keeping with the previously stated nature of the Old World Village, that of attracting patrons to the center and not individual business solicitation. Approval of said sign would set an undesirable precedent and foster subsequent requests for individual sign exposure from other tenants within the complex. �/1 J Attachments: � 1. Area map 2. Sign drawing 3. 10/28/77 approved planned sign program 1� 14 i , .� MEOW O 1000 lCTitf �— FEET GI cc x c` North antington r Center Specific Pla Rl a d LLI CF-E .'PA.R V*F, Q E CENTER IV dl Rl Rl ED150 l _. E =� C2 o: o oc a ' x f. ' to t„4CPJTtis�b9;s !I':IER Sfi LrT2 !i i i i PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM 77-3 Flo-J.nwtr+croM MACH ti JAUNmrT" BTU PLA NNG KPT. Y e 1 , , , , t Parking i , t Approved 1 t Tenant i t I.D. Signs } t Parking , t 1 � , Liquor - 4 i Shore Proposed Wall Signf Ped. Entry Ped. Entry CENTER AVENUE i • ii BUILDING LOCATIONS - OLD WORLD VILLAGE AA I NU NTIIICTOii lLAIIIMIi� 11ElT. �J r Y)A 41 f`4v NI r , 1 +'E L ; 7J� rr UyAFoG 4r2&5 vO-Y5 ++��U'�. �11L.L1 NGc. ��v ��� OLD - • �('� 1`�N�i' 141vG�. 1, �� 1 t.-►�.1Y'1 Or— TRE' �';:(���V . �'c�t.::�r �!/�2� TG tZc—FG—r_ i Y . r . i - 1 J ` . 7 Publish b 1 78�M , - • �a �,i�: white stock Postcards �lrz' ' IWICE of MBUIG NWINC 4 Appeal to Do'nial of Nall Sign i WTICB IS HURRY GIVU that i b Pu lilc bearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Charmer of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:3� o,■„^, P.M. , or u eocn whereafter as possible, on Monday the 16th day of January , 1978 for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission denial of a wall sign proposed to be included in planned Sign Program No. 71-3 for the Old World complex located at 7561 Center Drive approximately 540 feat east of Gothard Street in the North Huntington Center Specific Plan. The proposed wall sign is approximately 25 square 1 feat in area and would be located on the southerly face of the wosternmost building f facing Canter Drive. ) . 4 All interested persons are invited to attend said bearing and 1 . express their opinion for or against sold _Uesl. Further information my be obtoAasd fray the Office of the City Clerk. Q!1'1'Blp: 12/27177 -- CITY OF. WWIl1=* RuCH . By: CityiGlirk entrarth f � NO'"10E TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING IT>arl ?lanvn¢dYl TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: �Sa!wX�0. PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NM ICE FOR THE lg DAY OF It✓xu�p�,, 197 . (2As are attached AP's will fallow No AP In Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal ✓� Ot'�Pr Adoption of Environn,ental Status (x) YES NO Refer to -baxK , Planning Department - Extension # sin for additional information. ID I * If appeal, please transmit exact wnrcling to be required in the legal . •�i.7 I' t. .i . •C: . . ... •� . .a.a•C'.Y{'.:n•..:.7l..�'wii.yp:a�la.d.:N� SDI•,'"i'u I ' Number of Excerpts Publish Once LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission denial of a wall sign proposed to be included in Planned Sign Program No. 77-:3 for the Old World complex located at 7561 Center Drive approximately 540 feet east of Gothard Street in the North Huntington Center Specific Plan. The proposed wall sign is approximately 25 square feet in area and would be located on the southerly face of the westernmost building facing Center Drive. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7:00 P.M. , on � January 16, 1978 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the appeal of the wall sign denial . Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 29th day of December, 1977 CITY COUNCIL By 142-342-05 ,•Swind viLLage 00" Appeal - sign Program `�13919 p_rWkwan ]Rd ' _90701 A. , 142-472-02 Seawin3 village Wioefflinger, Melvin J .13919 Strati m l Rd Gerritns, Calif 90701 ~142-472-03__..__ __ _ __.._ ......_ _ ._.._.._... . .. . . _. . . . . ... _ 'West C7oast Scccer league Inc 105 N Fastwaod AVenue Inglewood, Calif 90301 .142-•472-01 City-of Huntington B=h ; ..142-071-54 Coast C mwintty ColIgge DiStr. 2701 Fairview &I 0osta Hwa, Calif 92626 142-071-58 Montgomery Ward Dev. Corp Attn: James G McWaters . 619 W Chicago Avenue Chicago, xll. 60607 Huntington Center -:10100 Santa Monica Blvd. , 'Suite 1900 Los Angeles, Calif 90067 , . .,.,. ._ 142-071-63 Jerwll 111'rs p i sea '111 C 3rd St San Dims, Calif •: 91773 - 142-091-68 _ PERR � 610 Rdn Street LoS Angales, Calif 90014 142-071 i 2- So. Calif =.-Axi 0 P.O. Box lu Huntington Bew.h, Calif 92648 .Dept of transportation 120 So. Spring Street Los Angeles, Calif 90052 Attn% Staff Assistant Dm-si.nn r .._,__..n'i •,, � . .,... .. :1 - _ ,• ... .. . •, .. .. -.... i.ri.w.;;.,...w..a:•CaY:4aXVt,i l : 1. { � T r Publishtd Huntington Beach flews, Jan. IIIITICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Appeal to Denial of Wall Sian fIOTI+:E IS HEREBY GIVEN that public nearing will b• held by tho CHI Council of the'City of Huntington Beaon, In the Council Chamber of the Clv'c Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of MO P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday the 16th day of January, 1978, for the purpose of con- aiderin j an appeal to the Planning Com• mission denial of a wall sign proposed to be Included In Planned Sign Pro- gram No. 77•3 for the Old World Com- plex located at 7561 Center Drive sp- proyimately SW f:et east of Gothard Street in the North Huntington Center Sbe,^:f c Plan. The proposed wall flan Is apFroxirnately 25 square feet in area and Mould be located on the southerly face N the westernmost building facing Center Drive. All Interested persons are Invited to attend said hearing and express their h. opinions for or against said appeal. 1 { Further Informat'on may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. DATED: December 27, 1917. CITY OF 14UNTINGTON BEACH By: A"cis M. Wentworth City Clerk r i OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 2000 Main Street !�26A8 Huntington Beach, California } l I �1^'+rl• .. �ryn.r.��. .i tM1•Cw wr......�.w....n...p•_l:t+•. ll..nrw.w�....�. .. .•.—.+tirwriMF. J�� Offfco of tho City Clerk f leg City of Huntington BeachP.O.Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 142-472-01 ' City of Hunt -sibon Dewh i aa: 1 ndl F w � ` �, i OFFICi: OF THE CITY CLERK I 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 A i A r� ' 1 1 Published Huntington peach News, Jan. S, 19TC. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Appeal to Denial of Wall 51an flOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hewing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, In the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour ? of 7,30 P.W., or as soon thereafter as passible, on Monday the 16th day of January, 1975, for the purpose of con- sidering an appeal to the Planning Corn• mission denial of a wall sign proposed to be Included in Planned Sign Pro- gram No. 77-3 for the Old World com- plex Icested at 7561 Center Dive ap- proximately 540 feet east of Gothard Street in the North Huntington Center Spa::fic Plan. The proposed wall sign is approximately 25 square feet In area and would be located on the southerly face of the westernmost building facing Center Drive. All Interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal. Further Information may be obtained frem the Office of the City Clerk, DATED: December 27, 1977. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk , I i i I a Affidavit of Pr Vication �U �.:. • State of California County of Orange ss City of Huntington Beach George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years, U; That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach / V, News, a weeirly newspaper of general circulatbn printed and pub- Vshed In Huntington Beach, California and circulated In the said A'`' County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide subscription list of paybtg subscribers, and said paper has been / established, printed and published In the State of California, and y County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper Is not devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any j ; particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denorninatiun, or any number thereof. r liehed,M3mline4xi76each'News:.Mar., The Huntington Bench New ryas adjudicated a legal nettsixtper 1. ten+.` �•: r, ►':. -r ; of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel In the Superior Court NQfie�;OF'PURLtC NRJtRiftG of Orange County,California August 27th, 1937 by order No.A-5931. CGWAPPEAL 1 ! NOTICE IS,IA.RPBY GIVEN that a puts ,1 mg.,hearing,Nill d hold,try " City 1) That the NOTZCF QF' PUflJ,TC N>~A} _. ;:Oimq of the►Fitr of iiuntt"Con Reach.; IN IRe-Council:,Chamber of Ithe,Civic 'enter. Huntington peach, at the hour of ! SIGN APP�;AL- 7=x P.M., or,ap soon thereafter as Data. +s'•bIA:on Monday, the lath day of Marc of which the annexed Is a printed copy, was published In said news. .1914. for;the purpane'of.ConaidoWnstan adpeal• of.,•.fia- Manning Cpmmisakafa, altitfn to dtnr'a Ii2o sQ. ti.'slin tor'an paper at least one ianue ♦frlatidg trallet.'stk)p stbreflocated'aO { �mi mist Bi IL.bauln Gbh NW04''in'the 0 Coftiur►w commencing from the nth day of A o _ 1. %,anl fileee OlLtrtcl..An%I%Z OeieFipt'i loftacne.�Hie:IQ.,ihe;WtannRtt}�piert!+!W!'I� >in..74 and ending on the 7th day of _ ar'Ch - _ - Ailrintar"ted p ertons,,are Invit ie iattend .said hoarlr4 add 'Vak�hrsi`', oplp!ao s for ix apelrrst aaip.51V{ :1 • Further."isr)ormiifinnimay�tiel'bdt+lirlid! 19� both days inclusive, and as often during said period and ,iroin the office;of IN C1ty'CIW%,; timea fandbenilren as iss said paper aid %vasiregularlyaper p �issued, not tn the a tnATEor I.tPrcb 4,1s7i':'regul ,,, supplement, and said notice %vas published therein on the following ` ' CITY OF,ryM.Went pN!lFACH.a dates, to-wit: +. ' r+i4"I la M.Wentwo•1� ' �rtY Clerk Mar, 71 1924 w Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this 8th — day of I Harch 197.4 Notary Public t Orange County, California , f THOMAS D. `�NYLLIE Noferr Poblk•Caliroreta otan90 County M Ccnrrhruloa Eaorn, eP(sftbar 12, 1974 r w� Icy of Huntington Beach County of Orange Mate of California -I i } ,fl f f irlavitof Publication of GEORGE FARQUHAR Pubrither Huntington Beach News Filed- Clerk j By Deputy Clerk ` 1 i r 1 h 1 1 . •.r R Publish�„��y�ib_, , Pink Cudopcarda �, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ar UMA. -- rw 1rrr��ryW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the (:ity of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 24M P.N. , or as soon thereafter as possible, on the _ i. ftb day of 19.�r.r74 , for the purpose of irrr�..w.wr�rwirr�r rFD 1 considering sa *"I of tM Plana leg Caa issiaa's "tion to isay a 1" e4. ft. sips fse as misting trailer samly #two 3aaste4 aPIGNAN +itely US ft. of stark sorest, am* of Bomb Blwi.I in tke i2 amity slalom gimlet. A feral 4eos J"ift is as file in the PIN"" ft""W"o offt". All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and r express their opinions for or against said &&M Asesai i �a'sr�w�rr.���rrrr�rw# i[II Further information may ba obtained from the Office of the City Clark. DATED: Womb It.1974 CITY 0 HUNrINMN BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk r � i f I '.'vim • r , � t r, Puljl i h Once I LEG.47. NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING j NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will Lac: hold by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Br.;tch, alif or,'Aa for Lhn purpose of considering an appoal oi' the Board -of Zoning Adjustmonts action to deny a 120 sq, it. j ! sign for an existing trailer supply store located approximately 135 ft. south of Stark Street , east of Beach Blvd. ; in the C2 Community husine5s District. A i legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office . Said hearf.ng will be held at the hour of 7: Q0 P.M. , on February 5 , 1974 , in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, California, on 5th Street between Main Street and Orange Avenue. All interested persons are Invited to attend said nearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Sign Appeal Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271. DATED this 24th day of January. 1974 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By .� Richard A. Harlow � Secretary 1 I ` rmj HUNTINGTON BEACH TRAILER SUPPLE( 16141 REACH BOULEVARD - HUNTINGTON REACH, CAMORNIA 91647 - 714/556.9500 C EC CAVE K February 27, 1974 IIU011HGUN E1t.:CIt.CALIF: City Council P.O. Box 190 �7� FEB 2T P11 2 :2 3 Hunt. Beach, Ca. Gentlemen: In reference to permit No. 73-•4 regarding our 120 square foot roof sign, made Feb. 20, 1974. The Board of Zoning denied our appeal and we re-appealed to the Planning Commission. Then the Planning Commission sent it beck to the Board of Zoning for further study. After the study by the Board of Zoning it was seat back to the Planning Commission for a final decision. All of this has taken approximately four months and v-p are still at the same point where we started from--- Nowhere. 1 Further reasons will be submitted to the City Council at the hearing, so that we may gee an approval on our sign. Yours truly, Steve Aband nato .S'aft larliae ij Our Kilyulalron -- i Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission DATE: March 6, 1974 ATTN: David D. Rowlands, City Administrator RE: Sign Appeal in connection with Use Permit No. 73-4 Applicant: Joseph Abandonato and 1700 Irvine Avenue Appellant: Newport Beach Location: Approximately 135 feet south of Stark on the east side of Beach Boulevard. Request: To construct a 120 square Foot roof sign. Planning Commission Action: Denied: February 20, 1974 Vote: AYES: Kerins, Wallin, Boyle, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Geiger, Higgins, Bazil Summary of Staff Report The proposed sign to be located on the western portion of the building is 4 feet in width with an overall. length of 30 feet. The proposed roof sign is to be mounted with two poles generally straddling the air conditioning facade above the building. The proposed sign meets the allotted square footage allowed by Article 976 (Sign Code) . On December 26, 1973 the Board of Zoning Adjustments denied the proposed 120 square foot roof sign. The Board reasoned that the subject sign is incompatible with the surrounding vicinity. On January 2, 1974 the applicant appealed the Board's decision. The Planning Commission considered the appeal at its February 5, 1974 mseting. The item was continued until February 20. 1974 to allow the Board of Zoning Adjustments to reconsider the proposal. After receipt of additional justification from the appellant, .the Board recommended to the Planning Commission that the proposed roof sign be approved. 'l i I PAGE 2 Additional Information The Commission denied the appeal for the following reasons: 1. Additional signage would be detrimental to the surrounding property, and would not be in conformance with the City of Westminster Sign Code which regulates the adjoining properties. 2. The proposed sign is not in conformance with the original plot plan as initially approved by the Planning Commission for the project. 3. The existing identification pole sign does have adequate exposure and is not hindered by overhead utilities. Environmental Status The proposed sign is a Class 11, Categorical Exemption, California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Supporting Information Submitted Herewith: 1, Staff Report 2. Area Map 3. Minutes of February- 20, 19.74 meeting Respectfully submitted, a(L�' ichard A. Harlow Secretary RAH:JC:mc Attachmv.nts � I i f ® BOARD of xonm ADJUSTMEMS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH-CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 190-9160 PHONE U14)536-5271 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dave Eadie, Chairman and Secretary, Board of Zoning Adjustments DATE: February 14, 1974 RE: Recommendation on Sign Appeal - Huntington Beach Trailer Supply On February 5, 1974 the Planning Commission continued the hearing on an appeal filed by Mr. Joe Abandonato in reference to action by the Board of Zoning Adjustments to deny a proposed roof sign. The Commission requested the Board to re7ider a recommendation as to what alternatives could be sought ky Mr. Abandonato to meet the intent of the criteria for approval of identification signs. On February 13, 1974 the Board discussed the sign program for the subject site with the appellant and offers the following tiomments and recommendations: 1. The Board discussed allowing the roof signs and hringing the pole sign down to a monument type. However, Mr. Abandonato indicated that there would be no possible place within Ordinance Code limitations that a monument sign could bp- safely placed on his frontage. 1. As previously discussed with the Planning Commissicn, ! Mr. Abandonato reiterated his need for thn roof sign as the view of his pole sign is hindered by overhead utilitiaa along the right-of-way of Beach Boulevard. 3. Mr. Abandonato indicated that he had to keep the square footage of his pole sign down to a bare minimum as the pole had to be high enough to clear the recreational vehicles yet low enough- to miss the overhead utility lines. Thus, he indicated that the smaller square footage just didn't do the job he anticipated it would. RECOMMENDATIONS: Upon receipt of additional justification from the appellant it was the consensus of the Board to recommend to the Planring Commission that the proposed roof sign be approved. it was the majority opinion of the Board not to recommend the pole sign be removed Y STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: February 5, 1974 FROM: Planning Department ZONE: C2 Community Business SIGN PtPPEAI, i :APPLICATION: Use Permit No. 73-4 i&I'LICANT Joseph Abandonato i & 1700 Irvine Ave ` APPELLANT: Newport Beach . ;q, LOCATION: Approximately 135 ' south c:f _.. Stark on the east side of Beach Blvd. r REQUEST: 120 sq. ft. roof sign ~ GENERAL INFORMATION.. On December 26, 1973 the Board of Zoning Adjustments denied a l proposed 120 sq. ft. roof sign identifying Huntington Beach Trailer Supply located at the above mentioned address. The Board reasoned that the subject sign is incompatible with the surrounding vicinity. { j On .:anuary 2, 1974 Mr. Joseph Abandonato, applicant, formally appealed the Board's decision pursuant to the tc.a day appeal period allotted. A copy of the letter of appeal and the minutes of December 26, 1973 regarding the sign are attached for your consideration. SIGN DATA: The proposed sign to be located on the western portion of the building is 4 ft. in width with an overall length of 30 ft. The proposed roof sign is to be mounted with two poles generally straddling the air conditioning facade above the building. The proposed sign r.:eets the allotted square footage allowed by Article 976 (Sign Code) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed sign is a Class l�, Categorical Euemption, California Environmental Quality Act 1970. CONCLUSION: In view of the present development to the north of the subject site (Huntington Executive Park) and a mass of vacant land to the south of subject site located in the City of Westminster, the Board felt L•.yat tha proposed sign would be detrimental to property located in the vicinity and is not warranted an a pole sign which 'adverti-ses the game copy 16 existing on 'tre site. I RECOMMENDATION: ' The staff concurs with the Board of Zoning Adjustments and �. recommends denial of the proposed roof sign for the reasons as previously stated. ATTACHMENTS: letter of appeal minutes HZA December 26, 1973 area map DE:sp I III II I ALQRICH AVE ' prD qW 1 I - . J STARK. AV_. STARK AVE � ) ' A IAT I F_- 4 H L —AVE T Cl VA r,ART QA F r G EU j �W O� QR. ' I I 1 t 1 + o ,000 lCAL[ IN rltT USE PERMIT NO, 73-4 2.folcws HUNTINGTON BEUN FLAMMIMG KFT. � w 11 i January x, 1914 City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 90 Huntington B ingeaCho CIA 92648 I, Gentlemen. � I We are hereby submitting our mppeal on the Board's decision regarding our 120 square foot roof sign. made on the 26th of December 1973, as we feel the reasdn for denial unwarranted. Sincerely. �;eW .Joseph D. Abandonato 1 • I� J tAlmw cct files RECEIVEC3 JAN 4 1974 PLANNING 1 + Minutes: 11. B. Board of. Zoaling Adjustme-liLS Wednesday, December 26, 1973 Page 14 Location: Same It was t;ie concensus of the Hoard that tiie wall sign met ordinance code requirements. ON AOTIVN BY EADIE AND SECOND BY SPENCER WALL SIGN WAS APPROVED BY ! THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Spencer, Eadie, Ford ROES: none ABSENT: None Applicant: 14r. Abandonado 120 SQ. FT. ROOF SIGN 10242 Beach Boulevard Huntington Beach, Calif. Location: Same Board discussed roof sign. It was the concensus of the Board that the roof sign was incompatible with surrounding vicinity. `I ON AOTION BY FORD AND SECOND BY SPENCER ROOF SIGN WAS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON AND BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: ` 1. Subject sign is incompatible with surrounding vicinity. AYES: Spencer, Ford, Eadie NOES: None ABSENT: None 1•1ISCELLc':NEOUS: NONE THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, MEETING ADJOUrZNED. I Dave Eadie CSax es P. Spencer Acting Secretary Chairman i v Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, February 20, 1974 Page 3 6. Off-street parking shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. AYES: Kerins, Wallin, Boyle, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Geiger, Bazil, Higgins USE PERMIT NO. 73-4 - SIGN APPEAL Applicant and Appellant: Joseph Abandonato Mr. Eadie addressed the Commission and stated that the majority of the Board had recommended approval, of the proposed roof sign. Chairman Kerins opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Joseph Abandonato r.ddressed the Commission and spoke in behalf of the proposed roof sign. Commission discussed the Sign Code of Westminster which governs signs adjoining Mr. Abandonato"s property. The public hearing was closed. ; ON MOTION BY BOILS AND SECOND BY WALLIN SIGN APPEAL ON USE PERMIT NO. 73--4 WAS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS AND BY � THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. Additional signage would be detrimental to the surrounding i property, and would not be in conformance with the City of Westminster Sign Code which regulates the adjoining ► properties. i 2. The proposed sign is not in conformance with the original plot plan as initially approved by the Planning Commission for the project. 3. The existing identification pole sign does have adequate exposure and is not hindered by overhead utilities. AYES: Kerins, Wallin, Boyle, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Geiger, Higgins, Bazil ZONE CASE NO. 73-26 Applicant: Frank H. Ayers & Son Zone Case No. 73-26 is a request for a change of zone from R5 and R5-0 to PD R2 for property located on the northeast corner of Memphis Avenue and Delaware Avenue. The reason for � this: request is to allow applicant to lace 9. 75 units� pp p per acre on a planned development concept. This Zone Case was continued � from the meeting of February 5, 1974 to allow applicant the Opportunity to determine if the R5-0, R5 and C4 property fronting on Beach Blvd. could be included in the proposed development. -3- 2/20/74 w PC Minutes: H.B. Plannil. Commission r Wednesday, February 20, 1974 Page 4 Mr. Ed Selich addressed the Commission and stated that the property in question is 4 .25 acres and is predominately vacant. The owner has Indicated that he would be willing to negotiate with applicant for purchase of property. The owner of the oil rights has also indicated he will be willing to negotiate with applicant. He recommended that the application be continued pending completion of the Old Town Study which is scheduled for completion for the first study session in April. Vugraphs of the subject property were shown. Chairman Kerins opened the hearinr, to the public. Mr. Mike Jagger, representing Frank H. Ayers & Son, addressed the Commission. He stated that he would be agreeable to a contintance to allow for staff completion of the Old Town Study. Chairman Kerins closed the public hearing. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY WALLIN ,ZONE CASE NO. 73-26 WAS CONTINUED TO MAY 7, 1974 BY THE FOLD)WING VOTE: AYES: Kerins, Wallin, Boyle, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Geiger. , Higgins, Baril ZONE CASE NO. 7:3-19 Applicant: Initiated by the Planning Commission Zone Case No. 73-19 is a request to change the existing K- zone to ROS Recreation Open Space. The existing use is a golf course. i Acting Secretary Selich gave a brief resinne on the staff report. II Vugraphs of the property were shown. Chairman Kerins stated that the Planning Commission had requested the City Attorney's office to advise them the proper method of changing the zoning for this Property in December of 1972. The hearing was opened to the put.lic. Mr. B. Carroll, President of Meadowlark Homeowners Association, addressed the Commission .and stated that some 7,000 signatuxes had been obtained in a petition to change the zone to Recreational Open Space. Mr. Ken :'.-arins; President of. the Home Council, addressed the ' Commission and stated that he concurred with Mr. Carroll and en- dorsed the zone change. He urged the Planning Commission to send a memo to the City Council urging them to promptly acquire thr property as it has been in limbo for over a year and d lose of funds could result. ' --4- 2/20/74 - F. •:(,-..\ AIT, :. , 1a�s h 3uade�nato 171rostsawe Tin 4 R�iber Ga. 1 CO T:-riA* Avenue Tax O"t. .;'mart �iadk, Calif 1204 P sta�r�+ rwy lea 44317 r - . . . . - - . - -. Co"thy+ T. pack i Jews A.. Me+artA ;:=3t aI lmriea,Trust Dept. OD�O�, it. 11I W,. 7tk DtTaot , .1tarber grams Offics � .&Z4 Ample#, Ca. 90024 2700 Me"Or WayCuts � �wyal �. 1le,tiri ! i Dist# C. L*r w 16271 levrch 317d. I69 i6a sa Dti+na UmtLZIUA ieoeb, Calif i k G Casts gas&$ Cslic 92626 � 9Z6�7 ------------- - ----- --- --- Alan Ilaaec*latx i 1902 - 17� 3Ls�et Vasil J. l cr`�,i Humtlartan Death, Calif !.�171 ?fa3ags�s Ltata r , ?',,+atia,,jtnn saeich, Ca"I f i Attn: District Supt. r 92647 _ _ 7*'aQu H. its N� Oceca 1F1QV1, Sth*ol Distri c* � ;.)!l �47ta2oy Agra , 9372 anrwr Amuss °as¢aials!or Calif Hwatiaafiv= 3eiegb, Calif i J3:533 Attn: District went. i r . . . . . ... .. . . ... . • . . . . . . � tUmt Is,ltoa PxscutiT* Parr i lTap►t. vx TA'sat wst8ti� 1 fro Spring 3tto�at art Yin t�,tVAq rrina i Los At:q*U*, Calif 00052 9.12•9asw I)s1 Asr�, raliff Atex:Stsff Assta.Desiga D 1 J't291 r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . O'%m 3jtav Capital Corp. 4350 111.2 Ns�iaw r ..azlAa L'el Roy, Calif ' I J9391 ' � I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I ' orrrus :aad a• I ?'. A ' neac e Gall: r All Viow Plac* 7. 3%wn IlWaa, Culi: 111tic-AMld•1 liar. Co. ...:a J. C%,xrc.!a Rd ;s,.t *I P=33to, PA 19409 f Publis led Huntington such News, Mar. 7. 1974. NoncE OF PUBLIC HEARING SIGN APPEAL y NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub- !) lice besting will Is* held by the City, Council of Ufa City c.f Huntington Desch. In the Council Chamber of tht Clvle j Centr. Huntington Batch,at the hour o: TM P.M. cr ax soon thereafter as pas- ! albla,on Monday, the isth day of March. 1974, for the purpc&e of consider;ntl an apfval of the Plirnina ComotlsslM's action to deny a 170 sq. It. sign for an existing trailer suprly store located art- proximately 135 IL south of Stark Strwit. cost of Beach Blvd, In the CZ Commun- j Ity Business District. A lexal dmrlptlon Is on file in the Planning Oetutrtment IDIOM All Interested persona are !nvited to ! stlerW said hear!ng and esprass their opinions for or against sold Sign Appeal. Further tnlonnatton may be obtainad ftm the Office of the City Clerk DATED, Urmh 1, 1974 ! CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Sys Alicia M.ftntworth . City a It I i e P.O. BOX so CALIFORNIA 92S48 -J f OFFICE W. THE CITY CLERK March 19, 1974 N;r. Joseph Abandonato 1700 Irvine avenue i; ;:port Beach, California Dear Mr. Abandonato: The City Council at their regular meeting Feld Monday, ,arch 18, 1974, took action to overrule the decision of the Planning Commission and approve the appeal filed by Huntington Beach Trailer Supply of the Planning Corinission's action to deny a 120 square foot sign for an existing trailer supply store located approximately 135 feet south of Stark Street, east of Beach Boulevard in the C2 Cowunity Business District, subject to conditions which may be placed upon it by the Planning Cepartmcnt. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentvorth Ci ty Clerk AFC;!:cb eAS , Muble'ace digit%vivt formed 2165 yellow P(ex Nichground, r 1 4 Cup and donut linF:-pnt%!o; p is 2416 bror.•n screorned on fortned, I whitr�.hfer.panel. -Wincholl'9 I Dom)t House•24111 grown formed. ; s Plax letter.. Interior tW MA sllu►t7in7tion. J Cabinet finlsh'to nuitch 2418 brown, fi - - -- oil t ut "vases 72 t - I - = 0 +,.' , - i'. �— w.ares,sYra2T'c�rannAe Sc�Oes/W -. j r�+w'+n,«�•arwsn.s_ �•""7� �!l.•I/ arcix.:u►esti+..:�tilrx�r�.ra..•..,a+r �Tt..d /�".,.�4''1,C�-•. • �' "'` "..ice•' �//-� .Y..�����,r .... { GENERAL N BS 1. SIb'N.SHALL B$ OF INCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL AND APPROVED PLASxIC. 2. ALL CONNEC,TION5 SMALL JE " T1QLT5 EXCEPT AS ?tOT . - �•r. :i.''r;, : , .,......,r�..++�5r.�..�r.�.,w,,....a i,w•w�wtrwriar �y'}" t •ti.�+0;'ted fi l i"�,15'.a�,.1 7,��� (,. r. Ai 4z7 �'rc� � � r ra'•+1 , tail ,, -. to •I•,'a: J' ��t fit `,l•�,�t1tfl�'txe �,"t:� �JfrC.l1 ' Y , '!{"' 11��y�4,,��,`r.:.a45• ':,��'i�+Y'"fie; f � 7 - . arAly tt + 7 t! tt 'p71 ,� i�rrfc s+�r.`rtit�d t: if tit#'1;'tpu�.�tjt�ttfttti,��i,;':'.' ',';;•, N 77 r'•''�!�!�vtchi 24�fn brr�irri;�.� ; r' (z) %? E3�7"':�� , • ! K � . LtYs�r:.el fl :�Y' � y�t� c l.I.1' `•• vA +r (1. l•1.',,4�, R1,1',}Il.r•' ' �`�•' / \\ I' (I t , lE�11 ' � .I _,+G��•C....-"1�/'a'`�� � i', 1 ....1��_.....f St� .;. :" 5 ; I I Al jJ/t j4 •. . tT,S�y�tJld�t`'i�,:f�• ,1� Sr ;r 0 oim) X�t•4ls 24�AOI.2-'�.R' ' rr' � '•�' ( 17r � '4��t rj7, 8�7/•71�J/ [./-/V' n'.'!• r ` // �l. �. , r y•' .a C i1 t y +-+w„tM� },I'1 -r 5'•'I. •.. 1:.. '.. .•' { ' ,/ •/ , r +t ' •`.'t ly'•'�!r`��'��tLY /t �1. l Y,M�MA'.� �1+ '�'�...�I' _,I'•/ « �GZ'�/"a '� Awle.%� 7Fn 7 - ) 1• _ `� 'r f' t i c F F r S�'4 aS l tij 'U'it(J . .j� ._ :�) 5 I? •'r`r�� afr 1 �f ?` •« Il t� t 1 5 ;'it,r� i �t l 1 i �rr•I v.�'/"^, ✓ �/1:�.'•� � ��.. 11 1 •+.1 t �•:` f. 5 /it �1'tyJ;t+ I Jt�: MY �"+�' �� iJt t ? t1�•�M"aw•r� � � G•%7!�i�j7p"1I/w ,. •,''"�lyfyr 'r�ki t.,t•t ! !. �,I e\ �'�t ��;•�4�'•dtiy�\Ii �� r I'J, �iTS`'f(Y 7 . f �. ., t _J. ., ! L/� _ > ' F ,. i -'�`�`I .{�•�I+I•t'f',�7 t j3.t r r t } ; ,�',tt 1 t.', r ., sr ..r:•� , t.'i r,t,I. 7.,1t1 i°•'{t L .r rL4 ,`;'`;`i''i 1{ ` ,. �� �•� � Mir ! l.��� t i'tr ,�t' ,,f,i ti. �'� ,r� 'I k,', f4i��{pp{ii:,41•'t{+:Sri, . . :,` r 4 •� `y1 f! j. t ,t t •i 15 Z !� '�.14 is ti .7'S, a •• - - .. s •7 f '.' } t (r( •'; , I IT } 5ia�i3 -�t`Ji�'t Ni;lt.� ," � � .. .. \ �7.�, ilttt' .)4¢:: .:trc. !• lt. }j�•�F�' \ '��,, tt}wr i a.i. �' .t U.A`4�tt�lr`t'•.��-.11 1 _ t Y .Jl 1 t�]•Y i ZIR :{' ti +•i. F 1 ir- l;', t. � :1• ,F 1 •/ e � '.f r!'• •17 Ur,-1 Y� Its ap i �%.�. .;•.1;.,� ,Vie,.?4`X�,�. '•Y ' a1 Z . ____0 • a ;r.tJ•j'1fi+11 t +• ,. .t, ' e t f� , t- � ii t' t �.� t!` s't, 'C.i'[l.i��l�}i5�sj4ii{�CCti �' t l 1 "..«.-«. •1j t .1, '.!; ,,. •.�'2.( / 't . ,t th{:,,k .t•�,��'t1�: 'a j 1;;( .,, �r -' �' ,1 _ '` ,4 .f, t '2 .t"s; �}.• Y� ii�.J�c T�ta�':��tjf �I r r,� , •�f, , t{,,.r ;�. t /� , , �, � t ,� .r._• ...-1.t..1 '.u.-•' ,." ` tit..?fit' � :�•t. . ;{ •�.t„yLa':>.�.`C t \.t. i; `tl .. !T t, •'--t1 t .'r.�• 'i !'��/ �i Ya...' ��� .•5;,:'•y��4�ti'��i7 T �''•� k. I "f r '! , '' 1 Ii• .t, ,t. .t `• t!- a: ,' ;' ;i,' '°r�i}: 7 .'i7 d;:` ��L ,r�•�`��., t. � r `S ,/'. // ',` ) ':}. +,1 t' .t r 4 •'tfi. �..t .+�,�,•t��.Ttx,Y.• . •1(."c �,s-,'L.7 Alt,. f •!,1 ',., •1 .1 •//.-�. -tf Y, t .,'{^„ t •t;� fl YwfiF'.i ` '1"•it`t�1t'i>'t•.I�ht Y,i �i i'.1 ' '�t. 'f' t t"«. 111 .'.'1; 's t 7 •" r 1 .t. f ,.T.' it,l•,�L' yj14J t`1t:.'f.41�:+'. ((i" �?af,J p.+:� � 'T�h�}t .t f< t i t 't ! s. f' ', •i: �7 �/.tt F ,` '.: -f' ,Y t.- h'i1,''`Ij' � 'nt'! <! •�•(t��••.•...1�:1�'4Y L.rt. iy(�, � •'F` }Sf ',a�•y• ,I! •r. t , , Yr. 1'a• .l' :it _ ,,.. •f,;S,;r�: f; ,•1"Y`•� •.� ,�•'�':c��yj'•r.,VC l4Y,`j•,a�•f E; j .;Yy�.."..!'��.5;�"71 y'..��' '.t � :1 LI _ 1"' ' ��.� s t t, 7t 'r•' t �' ,-�i � •f. •�/., -�. ; 7 'r;„t ;1 .1��r+��dl ��rt `.f:��j.l'•. •.i,`}F•,j t{r L �� r ,t,,'r+ •i , J. � " 1 ti '•,} s � rt r}.+�1 1 _ `i� r'>.. t t � ! •'t t •}! ,f a ,. .r ,�F tt t.ltp.r n! '.t l'u rtX 1 �", ��[i'.r�,,.'i', .t. .}' ^'r`i: t, ;t" ,,�' !{�• � •l ,. .ti, .. J :�i*tL'r1..it�tY � ♦.'�.T: }: � e ,r ;1 �.' ': �i.t, 4: r' 1 tl I�...I�� •�1••�' a �•1�.'!' ,t r V :;� f .`.� .:).i'-)',':F',�,��t�� tk ,�1 y,{• ;t.jtkl�Fa,.'�.r4,`t'�� tt}t}�',, -1 ``tlti` r •tt -) .! , 4! - '"t• t *)•' f •f . ,y }� ..•�••C" �ti'1,�t((.I .•t •yi• .I' er - - •i s f l r,e! t ., 1 t }•t r t:,i- 1, t •`�^"1 �� '�, t4tt ,�i/v'{{^s �• t. '1` f,.7..;^+' .1S .,t tr 1' - �i• r,. �, 't. , y 7• ` V �i^ .1 c �:}t. 'i;t�e�'.�•'�'• t ,FF,1•J r rTl,'1.•�j1. �tt + 't, ij4,L� .1%, 7r7r ':1••ri ' ,1' , .f , ,1'tt ;, ,' t t` r t •,♦ rtr. •�!"ti ti{_ �_�,.Yf rl.t �t T Y-y♦ _,jly}t+},7}Ir .� F.• f. •1. 11 �, V t iit. :4 1. a '` ,. ' "' .i' .'.t,l t'. 1 .t a.fi,`j'7� 'T. �'}ry, vi�i1� +�i,5��. =`.•� :!�•3.t.Y :.�i .t'�.••, `;1 tt a t ', 7 .4..L r. -, t 't' J .7Y rit, t .�.1•,=` 4Yt'�.a't1`tt; �.;,�:5�,#Y i3�,�4re B.L 11 .. -.t; ,t• tt .! ', L }. ,. ,t. ,i.l.l •,;3.. ,�,,LG 9 } .y,+li i."{i'•f'C ��"'j. �A 1 t'':� .i• J t R' ., ',' -i 't ti' .t' t t 1 �,.1. ,�, :,! i'•�'A.,'1t`a�l:Yltt! r t 'j I ♦,,st• . •�1' i�).. :'1 '.7' 1h/. .�I `I .7 •' t � � .�i}1 7. 3�.rti'�.r't' �,\+ri 1 L t ,i ,,'`}/ ll.r,��z.,t.,, li,t" '7. ! , t•• ,,; ....,.•.•r....... f, .' - f , t; , t1 ''�t.1."'�rtf s.��� t f�titt��• � .{• ` �ti� 't' 1 ...t � ..F, )' �.r�_..r_ `. ,) t t V r '�C C.T,:•" Ore, ` ', rt� :�,, � , �,�y Ste' I�• .. •," ,,`. 7 ,+ ,, r, 'L ;xiY..(,�,.�(� 1 +. ! t'.�.:1', '+j. l•:t. t.. '+� t' , ... Y�y:..�tt/I tp/1Y '� - ,, ; f{' !—�;.. `4 p�:iit',. �-td f:1-,Jj1 F t r , � t .• _ t. , r, i t r ♦ t '!�.L. tt .R :i t%I l 7 titj�,,1t fK`1 j +' 1 .L .� 'i ` . 1' ,,tf rt•. rr t, �ajtt.{'��t�.tY.jtj/1.t{. /' FR lGry�•'ri! - ;1 ,• ._ tl Jf t+, , ' *+�S4t ti{T`•,;+��:', h ! `t t .' � 7 1 .'i r f l Fe' tit'}f ` ♦. .e t • 't,t .. -i ,t j � a.tti lr: i"7�et�'S�'� �11 , 1 •t , 1 •. 4 ,S � !J t '! `� A J.,A ) lltTT yQ a , of 1 • Q1 DDonut Houses _•••.�•.•-'•--- wnf►w.ut.r:e. raw z.¢xrJ+rr.ef•. ,td'ts-r.•r.+.rt wr'.a•s...+••L..n.�.,..•...!: ...� ,_.....--_r.•Z,c•.w,1"aN 1�• 1-7 { GENERAL NOTES 1. SIGN SHALL BE OF INCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL AND APPROVED PLASTIC. 2. ALL CONNECTIONS SHALL DE h" BOUS EXCEPT AS NOTED. 3. STEEL PIPE SHALL CONFOi.H To A.S.T.H. A53 GRADE B. 4. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL. CONFORM TO A.S.T.H. A36. 5. ALL STEEL 3/16" THICK OR LESS SHALL BE GALVANIZED. 6. SHOP WELDING SHALL, BE DONE BY LOS ANGEI.ES CITY FABRICATOR #292. 1. ALL FIELD WELDING SHALL BE DONE BY LOS ANGELES CITY CERTIFIED WELDER. CONTINUOUS INSPECTION r/01'REQUIRED. D. SOIL IS AIMP141hf 44AY dr�C q",L . 9. CONCRETE MIX SHALL BE 1:2h:3� PLUS 1� GALLONS WATER PE.q SACK OF CEMENT. (f'c 0 2000 P.S.I. ) 2yzX2kij 10. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO A.S.T.M. A305 OR A15. O M. • NAT. G R. COUR ONCRETE AGAINST NAT. OR. r - DISTINCTIVE ELECTRI .CA ,L AD- V ER -1 S T 0 Ft E F R 0 N T . .M `0 D E R. N 1 Z 'A T,1 0 N. FOUNDATION DETAIL, 3225 LACY ST. LOS ANGELES 900SI CAPITOL" 34141 MST'[+ Tln% IS AM 69151AU tJpl klsm[tl MUMMO !UAt O It KUM AN CWAVY.At I'i�,~Mp,I= VC �e...t..�s :;`.• /f 1, ( I �,�rti-�¢z, Jam': tea .'�-a�� �%Y��/1,.��1f�. �}---•-=� I: i .�... .. ...__.. �..,._.._ ' {t ' " :..2•'`•S;�� �'9'G.•.�i`57.�..►' .�' �.•S-?•�'�/ Gf7(s� Gam. � _: `: I �� #•.,zit.•��.-.:��.c:�s�./,�=��r-1� r�„� � '� , : '� ,.�:� l �r;.:~.r:'����.,'��,,. �Y y• it me If �� �•t�;;•;f� � . (� 3G.yt:/! c.�,�. • _�� ,�,! /Vim' 1 �r3��•f'',l••' Ue1[ lY�,�n--•'w'�1L.•� �x-�a:::3'W�! Il�+� 01M7111 sno1R I to i, MAL rCRR/K-/ MK=rn �° V E R T i s ! N G r CY7rt Ml�oYrt 3 VFAW pMt1M1v� Mitt3 �i�',ibtAfiei ! 'ctAet.Vty, it 1t tVttlltlro Ica '/CHIT pttS U i(St, I't CaMNICtIDM wtTli A KOJECT REM RAINED M YtV rwT REATH AMC CWARY, IS It MQT 10 !I th M t4 #MonE WjjjCE Yowl t7RW1lLit1011:,llgtt tf'IT ,� w�rwra ■nu �.r�.�rrwa�w.�'r rwgw�w�R ` {1 5,t•�,rN r �.�lw►rMMMt1 , t ;,; _ h•'�� i..��Lwii�r'_•f•r,�•i�lr! ti/ �'�';w��..+r•+ '�!) ._.. �.._ L'�!1 :. 4AV 1& r 1'A1,g7lc:-a•1/: x '�', { ,. ' �L,` 1�R •`,' •+ z; •ayl'i y� /y .2SZx23tx51ib'oyaw e i _-1�1...... t _ 1��. Al :�,.,.ti ,EI S-7"/iSfl /C!/✓ -- -_.�.. ._._ _ __ _____. _... �....wA. 7 -..,... _ .. pp jt�i NF7�`���,�,�f. Tt11L /Y/��+�-�� ��✓! �� OL�111�A11 �M�N i'� ;1 r• a over fa AD V C R ? S N G "K` ` '• n.>tn .�fb,; •N I Z A T I 0 N _ _`�, •/,. + CAPITOL 34141 hT[yt l',hL1T11 AM CQtf'AMY. IT IS.>RC11I11TE0 f0C1 YOUR T'�RSt�Allt Uff. IH CCMH M ECVM WITH A ►MICT NIMO KA M ►0! YOU BY REATH AND CO WARY. IT 111 M TO BE VIM 10 ANYONE CUTS=.YWR CAMKITATICM•' 1104'U�IT '. t • �1 Ad Tit —` +JK IF I I I ti t ,ft tti• ,•I, � •� I i 5 t'�t"S'.�' r��'3y"ii K� t'111{"i •�',��1, � ,� .ti •I�t � �} + t� r• r rt ti ! �d d t ' ,!� t S :.}.;,,. t.l t"1 fr' ,F�''�t�`jt!}' � t�,;.�4{yy,�. { ! , rj rds: 1 r.. , } 1 \ .t•'l, �,. 'tom .,I� .�r• ,!1 e t �+�i. 1.,: ,, I4(L, t� - 'I 'A t'.. 1 !1 !S 5 tt tl 1 1 't t >' �• Yi ��}t+ �If 1j NC • ti i a' { t.'•\.1'. �S 1S tt �'v`�.. t. 4 '' { t t i ! t' t t ��. ,I.,�t,.:\�tr�C,15 1 �"4,•"L • jY �dT�}_,r;'j,�� ' j P 4.11I 17, it (4! I! ''j ' it � t. , ++ ',r,. t „�►r�� IJNTI�iGTON }. , pLANINING -DEPT... APR 5 h/�jf�./ /�/f/�w.�r • 1978. ':.:t t,• :;��s.;��t ,.t.,,, MY- P. 0. Huntington Bearh,CA926�}8 A{`�"� /r ��,�� ^ •Jr `'�nc+�t.►d.. r•t �`''•,�`J•h4 "'icy 1 !�j'/`�'�.C �'!r'►�L.►"/v'v/ .•���r,r'><"'� now O!. wfo�1 NNW ft . w.� t I,4�,}1�t•s .,4 IliJr .. .. .. I.. ..... I, r .. ♦ A_� I' � i WA,r Am in k/IlaM� t aft"in gl� it y /p! VW ET.IhdATM Alan CLgMY. lT ly.itoT,TD td:sgoTnr.TD d4111QVI( i+uTlIDF tp11! Op"InTICR, mm.is It if,/#( UttQ• rmftoxli iDt MMtD Ot umlvm IN,aIY rAtllrtar. , ,tA.♦ 5, .t+. t,. / ,51 tt. �.I�l�"a 1 t.5•, • ' .1.0 + 1 � ' 1' , � . • +O�\t✓h M�1�Y01�R1R11UWY� :� ,i•��1 j"}t1 `r l; `, ± t ! ,, _ `r .. ., , , it } I,f'r .Ihv•+ ((jj,+ � � Te 1 !'. Y tl 5"t ` �,Lrt ,t.;l 1�'I , .3 ,Ir. •1., h.,a, \ t}. � .it ', ,'•+ ' ;' lt' � +t 3 '� �' , I. ♦ (,.$, S �.,,., ( rll .idiot+.f,(,7 x.T'�