Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSignals and signs - Installation of beach bicycle control si March 26, 1974 T0: City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Emergency Ordinance Requiring Signs ' Indicating Prices of Gasoline and Hours of Operation at All Service Stations At the direction of the City Council, we tranomit here- with an ordinance requiring all service stations within II the City to post signs, visible from the street by pass- ! : ing motorists, Indicating the price of each type of gasoline offered for sale and the hours the stat;on is open for business. Y Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney DPB:WM:lm ' Attachment i i v3l'::._".�.. ....._ ..-.... .. - .... .... ........_.._ - ... ... . _.. ...__. ._.. ._........,.. ........ a a..._...o.w..�CJ�JA Eti.'L'.:J'S!"..`J rT"iti CITY OF HUNTIN GiTON BEACH • INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTNCTON SIAM DAVID D. ROWLANDS WILLIS MEVIS To City Administrator From Assistant Cite Attorney Subject Emergency Ordinance Requiring Date March 26, 1974 Signs Indicating Prices of Gasoline and Hours of Operation at All Service Stations At the request of the City Attorney, I rim forwarding the above emergency ordinance to you for submission to City Council, through City Clerk. j WILLIS 14EVIS Assistant City Attorney 1 ' WM:er j• At n . Ci Clerk 1 t. I i • 1 i } i i DAVID D. ROWLANDS WILLIS NEVIS City Administrator Assistant City Attorney Emergency Ordinance Requiring Idarch 26, 1974 Signs Indicating Prices of Gasoline and Hours of Operation at All Service Stations At the request of the City Attorney, I ;Lm forwarding the above emergency ordinance to you for submission to City Council, through City Clerk. � a WILLIS MEVIS Y Assistant City Attorney .y WM:er Attachment a Q � ? c.c. City Clerk j 4 Jt ;I f, 4. .i f i i 1 i t l � 111 E+a, �r �i y: ti tY• L 1 t7 REQUES ( FOR CITY COUNCIL- 'ACTION Date Submitted ta: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED BY CLTY COUNCIL Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator _� el Prepared by: k Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works CITY t.e U Subject: APPROVAL TO ADVERTISr7 FOR BIDS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF BEACH BICYCLE CONTROL SIGN L-S — Q7 C -- 7S( Consistent with Council Policy? [Xj Yea [ j New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The conflict between the bicyclists and the pedestrians along the beach frontage road has prompted the City to implement a program in order to improve the safety of the beach users. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the City council approve the plans and specifications for this project and authorize the Department of Public Works to advertise for bids for the Installation of bicycle control signals. 2. That the City C•. ,ncil approve transfer of funds in the amount of $20,000.00 from the Unappropriated C.oneral Funds Balance (Account #A301) to Account #415639. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this project Is to allow control of bike riders along the beach frontage road. Riders wil!. be required to walk their bike within the control area when the program is in operation. Thic task will he accomplished by installing flashing yellow beacons and regulatory signs to Inform the bike riders of the restrictions applied to the control zone. g PP The limits of this program will he between Sixth Street and Huntington Street. The estimated contract cost for the installation of the flashinq signals Is $20,000.00. FUNDING SOURCE: Unappropriated General Funds Balance (Account #A301): $209000.00 to be transferred to Account #415639. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: i 1. Deny the program. 2. Postpone the program. ATTACHMENTS: Fiscal Impact Statement PEC:LFS:JR:dw (� No 5/95 ` 1 . ' .•y.�rMMi�1'N�M• .w I �• � i lea CITY' OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION Wrrarcrow r«ai To PAUL E. COOK From ROBERT J. FRANZ City Administrator Deputy City Administrator Subject REQUESTED FUNDING FOR Date SEPTEMBER 21, 1988 INSTALLATION OF BEACH BICYCLE CONTROL SIGNALS FIS 88-12 i As requested und9r`the authority of Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been proposed and submitted relative to the proposed'installatIon of bicycle control signals along the beach frontage road. Anticipations an appropriation of $20,000 would be adequate for this purpose. An affirmative response by the City Council would reduce the unaudited, unencumbered balance of the City's unappropriated general Fund to $3,266,943. � I BE T J. FRjYNZ Deputy City Administrator i RJ Fssd 1 I 1 4024J REQ')Eb FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION 'To ..no ( L� [gate May I, 1989 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council "PROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator �•� l 19.Q1 Peopared by: Louls F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works CftTV C rnu i Sub)ect: SHORTFALL IN ACCOUNT #415445, TRAFFIC SIGNAL (F. Consistent w.th Council Policy? j Yes ( j New Policy or Exception r Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: i STATEMENT OF ISSUE: In order to pay the traffic signal maintenance bills for the remainder of the current fiscal year, monies have to be transferred from the general fund hack Into Account 11415445. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the transfer of $60,009.00 from unappropriated general fund to Account #415445, traffic signal maintenance. ANALYSIS: During the current fiscal year we have experienced an unusual number of knockdowns and damaged facilities by contractors and hit and run persons. !^ These Incident3 were unanticipated and as a result have created a shortfall_ in the signal maintenance account. The attached memo depicts some of the costs for these incident. Approximately $57,000.00 Is or will be reimbursed to the General Fund accounts. pP y ;;. FUNDING SOURCE: Transfer of funds from general fund into Account #415445, traffic signal maintenance:. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: I Deny the request or transfer funds from another acce-unt. f . i ATTACHMENTS: Cost breakdowns of the knockdowns and other incidents. LFS:JR:lw ` 20269 i i NO ales CI1 OF HUNTINGTON EACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MUhTWGTON I I ' To : Bruce Gi lmier From : Bill Smith Traffic Engineer Crewleader fic .Signals Subject: ACfOLXW #415445 Date : March 2, 1989 Joanne Varga, in Finance, infonned me today that she needs $26,094-.94 Plus, to pay the existing bills to Carputer Service Carpany on P.O. #27535. I only have a little under $6,000.00 left in Account #415445. The main reason for the shortage is the rash of damage done to our signals by contractors and citizens. Here is a partial list of the damages I am refering to: 1. 12/10/88 -- $937.68, signal pole knack-down 2. 01/19/89 - $718.07, signal drugged in TC 3. 01/18/89 -- $6,842.78, contractor cut: signal conduit 4. 12/19/88 - $17,901.00, vehicle totals eontroler cabinet 5. 10/17/88 - $3,179.09, vehicle knocks down signal pole 6. 12/11/88 - $21285.63, signal damage, hit-and-run 7. 12/16/88 - $1,199.79 -- cont:roler power supply shorts out, damaged 508 'of internal electronic pants Total Bost: $33,064.04 Plus still to ears—e -an est:imted $20,000.00 billing for controler cabinet at Warner and Springdale, to be replaced due to 'IC. An estimated $8 to $10 thousand for pole knock-down at Springdale and McFadden. Not: to mention five more nonths. of extraordinary mai.nterance, and any other unforseen TC's, hit:-and-run, or contractor's damage. Money in Aoc #415445 - $ 5,923.85 l Existing billings - $ 26,094.94 Sills to cam (approximately) - $ 30,000.00 $Is needed to pay roa - $ 20,181.36 Est:imted and needed for the next five months - $ 60,000.00 7 BS:ik i I s CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Lea" INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION "Upa iCTOM RUN To PAUL E. COOK From ROBERT J. FRANZ City Administrator Deputy City Administrator Subject REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION Date APRIL 21, 1999 TO FUND INCREASED TRAFFIC SIvNAL MAINTENANCE COSTS THROUGH FY 88/89, FIS 89-10 As 'requested under the authority of Resolution 4832, a fiscal Impact statement has been prepared and submitted relative to the proposed supplemental funding necessary to pay for traffic signal maintenance bills for the remainder of the current fiscal year. Anticipations are than an appropriation of $60,000 would be adequate for this purpose. An affirmative response by the City Council would reduce the ba-rialice of the City's unreserved, undesignated General Fund to $1,360,846. ' ROBERT J. FR N" Deputy City A ministrator RJFssd I 4503J i'I Fiscal Impact Statement SIGNAL MAINTENANCE ACCOUN r 1 . Budget Status The account iiz under budgeted. Thy large numt,er of knack- downs and related prob 1 i?ms which have occurred th i year j was not anticipated. 1 2. Total Cost:, } a. Direct: A $ 60,000 one t i mp e>r.pend i tury from the General Fund. b. Indirect: The loss of interest earnings on these funds. 2. Funding Source --- ------------ a. Funds: Unappropriated general funds now on deposit in account A 301 . b. Revenue Source: General Ta;;ation. c. Alternative Funding Source: None. d. i•f i story: General funds have been used Por this purpose in the pest. I a • ` 1 I AY '7Z REQUES . FOR CITY C4YNCIL ACTION t Date September 10, 1987 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City CouncilVr � ct v�.tGtt• y Paul E. Cook. Interim City Administrato �PP4tt1Yy%i1 nY Submitted b : fir lq� . Prepared by: Paul E. Cool., Interim City Administrator LV Subject: California Department of Transportation Grant for Tra ~.•Q1TY C C Coordination Consistent with Council Policy? [�l Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception ��/_ j Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: Jam' STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Funds for providing Improvement to the traffic signal timing an major streats inclueing the purchase/Installation of minor signal controller hardware are available to the city thru the California Department of Transportation. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No.531bauthorizing submittal of an application and execution of the necessary documents by the City Administrator. ANALYSIS: ' The State of California is making available $7.5 million for grants and technical support to local governments to reduce fuEl consumption through modifications to the timing of traffic signal systems within their jurisdiction. The Fuel Efficient Traffic Signal Management Program is adminiatered by the California Department of Transportation. Through the Fuel Efficient Traffic Signal Management Program, local governments are assisted In Improving traffic signal system timing plans through use of TRANSYT and other computer models. An average annual fuel savings of 6,000 gallons per Intersection Is anticipated based on statewide results from the first three years of the program since Its inception in January 1983. Local government agencies awarded a grant will be required to have project staff attend specialized technical training workshops. The training is designed to enhance the specialized skills of local traffic engineering personnel in developing fuel efficient timing plans for their signal systems. Funding for travel will be included in the grant requested. These workshops will be held In the Los Angeles/Orange County crea. The grant application will cover 13 intersections on.Goldenwest Street eligible under this program. Included in the application is funding for the purchase and installation of signal controller equipment needed at various Intersections on Goldenwest Street before coordination can be achieved. A 25 percent local match for both equipment and project labor costs Is required. f t P10 510 t' 1 Request for Council Action Caltrans Grant for Traffic Signal Coord. September 10, 1987 Page 2 FUNDING SOURCE: Budgeted personnel time will be used to provide the 25 percent local match for direct � labor costs (plus benefits). ; i Gas tax funds allocated for traffic improvements will be used to provide local match for signal contruller equipment. The total cost of the project is estimated at $57,354.37. The states share is $439015.78 and the city's share is $11,221.25 plus $3,117.34 In personnel costs. `' Sufficient unencumbered revenues are available In Gas Tax Account #741250, "Signal Equipment" to cover the city's share and from the unappropriated general fund to cover the state's share, which the state will reimburse to the city upon completion of project tasks. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Do not approve the resolution. 2. Reduce the scope of the application and adopt the resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. . /(� PEC:BHG:JT:lw 1389g , I ' I h REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION � r Date Januzry 7, 19 87 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Administratvr�'�'� , �,,,,,,�--- •---•---�'�OpUi c►- ' Ak'P1L0�'4p TtV C,'iTY Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director Public tb r ZW- Subject: REPLACEMEW OF PEllES PMW SIGIAL WJI CITY CL,t:ttT Consistent with Council Policy? Ex Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue. Recommxidation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments STAT EWR OF ISSUE.- Tie Department of Public Wor!Lt, through Purchasing Department, has requested informal Lids and has received five bids for suTplying pe&strian signal equipment. -RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the selection of Lingo Industrial Electronics to supply pedestrian signal equipment. 2. Authorize the Department of Public Works to request informal kids for instatla- tiara of pedestrian signals. ANALYSIS: Y. Informal bids were received on Deventer 29, 1986. The low bid was submitted by Lingo Industrial Electronics for $ 1.03,101.43 to supply 359 pedestrian signals. Section 614 of the Municipal (bdee "Contracts on Public.Works" restricts the informal contract amount to $ 25,000.00 for purchase of matey als and construction projects. However, under the same section of the axle, the City Council, by at least five affirmative votes, can authorize purchases or construction projects exceeding $ 25,000.00 if they are deemed to be of urgent necessity for the preservation of health and safety. The existing pedestrian signals may contain "PCB" which is a toxic environmental contaminant. Merefore, expeditious replant of this equirent is reo=mr nded. >•M= SOtECE: Eunding for this project will come from City Gas Tax Funds. $ 135,000.00 has been allocated for :his project under Acccunt #747090. ( ALTE.F=7W ACTION: 1 1. Do not authorize informal bids. AWAC MEMS: Hid sunnary JR:ik Flo sm R i cc cc TC at ST sT tT !T sT t *T cT =t TT Ls• j � a/ t � rTC� c OL 1� r!'• • L •►!f j- -wa71 �R•w;• f — !J _ wit( 6 •c p. i-E. '� a J: /.r. ►L. L.%• •r � s •.acs� r.}. L oa L J s au.1VJ J VQ _ 4 o LCF s r a C:� n ca•oRJ r�. G� cr _ . .. e. !F• c� .* a oe c !' coo as•q. , CU cs3 ! _ o�.• c as•h-�. • .� •-R ai• - .r �� Gear T , 'RiOi KsiY W&CA %Six IVA" ,s.NZZZ �t "-on&" USAI v-.V&04 /[SiI ITS& 11SLt 'i ■ol"Z12s10 O!1 ---- .-..�-j �.O.O.i ���.Q.O. .l.Q.i .-�al�.l.�..i �-- --•l•O•L 11iI SAYO A1= u L4SQ SiY 1S �tIN Si�Q'A1 I'sSO SZVQ iA so X&VG A1S X SMO friltii �S11ti .... Si •1Su verve s v VOGAZ11 ���--.of NOUN io"m NOUN LligpPOUSSA 1oa - f all �t r e PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 416-1229A QUOTATION NUM•iR CITY air HUNTINGTONrtACH She.thin•untb.e an OUTSIDE aj POST O/PICE box Igo or►cur""lope. HUNTINGTON 1119ACH.CALIPOI( IA ft{si Aga."'q►wts o•this farm. j "f" 41004 a AM Rr=ouEST FOR QUOTATIO • Due Mailed December 17, 19116 shut will W jttvive4 until 4:00 RM. December 29 1986 u the office of the Pumh sing Arm 1 Renalee Colrbett Buyer QUANT11'Y UNIT DLWRIFYION UNIT PRICE AMOUXI PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS Pedestrian signals shall conform to the Provisions in Section 86-4.05, "Pedestrian Signal Faces", of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions. Pedestrian signals shall be Type G. unless otherwise � specified. Pedestrian signals shall be international symbols clam shell solid --tote neon with a S year warranty, ICC Model P/N. 4094 D or approved equal. Pedestrian signals shall be furnished with s-cratn screen. f 300 ea Type "We Clam shell pedestrian signal head and mounting. r 23 ea Type "G" SP-2-T pedestrian signal heads and mounting. 6 ea Type t1G" TP-2--T pedestrian signal heads and mounting. 1 ea Type IIC" TP-1 pedestrian signal head and mounting. 'I Ovulations we tepqucited for furnishing the Itstme described TERMSe �, dsya In accordance wflh term& set forth 11trsin. All getoletions Sales Tax mama be l.O.li. delivered. The datailed specifications or Cub discount periods of lean than 30 braced amass or slueebers given herein is descriptive and In. 4tsl�rra *61 not be eonsidwsq In sward of dlcstes quality and Hyle of Men required. Offer to sup pl� b10r. loth a tam Is Isot oomsidsts4 egrgl wlitles substantially the agent as there described herein 96 Total to 30 days. be eoomideted provided the articles offered ore equal in AcuUNr. dreg►llity. mad Masse for the p rpow intended. Ali quotations fault tie signed. csplatllity of allarnatn wW be daUttained solely by ibe City of Huntington Dosch. Deltvery Address; Anontttea roue pteLY Tor Signature City of Nbatingeon Beet-% CaUfOralr PURCHASING VarAnTMaNT De11w.ry to be made on or beft'e CITY OF HUNTINGTON CNACN Tide P.C. cox IDS NUMTINSTON GtACCI.CALIF.aaH• ;. 7t• slat! TtLr 1fj f Isaa#:at of days Itrrn rererpt nt ordet trI •. T...• .• ► / •- .r rig r - e r October 6, 1986 City Council of Huntington Beach CoV1•.,nu,-l". 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 � r Re: March 5, 1986, Board of Zoning Adjus•.-ments, , 1,, i?re ricv; ff decision on Oakwood Apt_, and request for 700 (<,., street dedication TO ALL CITY COUNCII M31BERS! I am amazed at the constant lack of follow up procedures of these departments involved. Oakwood Apts. back in July, 1985 was granted a large sign providing they would remove the banners and flags. NO FOLLOW.`IrIn December, 19P5, this matter was brought to the attent"Ion of JVh Palin' s depart -ment. February 7, 1986 this matter was forwarded to the City Attorney's office for a hearing on March 5, 1986. This was only pur6ued because I appeared at the Council meeting and explained the run around and lies I was getting, otherwise it would of been shelved again. Mayor Mandic at the council meeting requested the City Attorney's office and the planning commission to create a follow up policy. It is apparant this was not done. BZA granted the Oakwood Apts. a 30 day permit due to a change of ownership, Fifteem (15) months of owning this complex hardly can be cinsidered as new ownership. See Exhibit 111". .sue For a court cade I discovered this foul up again,as Z was tryibg to obtain poove of ownership. BAA requested proper street dedication along Warner Avende- shall be made within tan (10) days of date of approval or they would revoke their approval of thirty (30) day ertention. AGAIN, NO FOLLOW UP On June 25, 1986 an Easement Deed was mailed from Hartfox •1 Connecticut, by IFD PROPERTIES. RETURNED because of no notary st,ti,p affixed. NO FOLLOW UP, On September 24, 1986 I discovered this loy trying to obtain a copy of the busihess license. See Exhibits"3" thrc 11611 . I. bring your attentir,r to Exhibit"7" a photo-copy of a land grant. Bala from IFD PROPERTI+j *'., ; CALIFORNIA SE.EN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. on JANUARY 31, 198=. I am also enclosing photo-copies of £ubarti.cle 7 and 8 on Dedication. I have spent time and phone calls on trying to get information I need besides doing you#,jobs. 1 � i Ted Anders of the City Attorney's office should of disqualified himself from this issue, because he lives in an Oakwood Apes. in , Garden Grove and the manager of -Huntington Beach would sub over 1 there. In fact, he is the manager there now. Mr. Godfrey said this extension was granted by the rec:ommenation oLf Ted Anders. When I informed Ted Andres of this he accused me of playing one apainst the other. I said if trying to get the truth is playing one against the other than I am. On September 241 1986, I talked to Les Evans, asking how could this i dedication be forgotten? He stood there with a smirk on h:s face I the whole time I was talking to him and presenting the copy og the minutes. His only comment was he had nothing to say. It is quite apparant there are persons not doing their job that they are being paid for OR deliberately not following up on this complex for reasons only you can find out. I have only hiphliphted this problem not to tike dour time on details of all calls and lies. Business License is for SIGNA CAPITAL ADVISORS, INC , Tebrhagy 10, 1986 BZA application list owner R&B ENTERPRISES and deed June 25, 1986 IFD PROPERTIES. QUESTION, IF IFD PROPERTIES SOLD TO CALIFORNIA SEVEN ASSOCIATES LIMITED 'PARTNERSHIP ON JANUARY 31, 1985HOW CAN LAND DEED BE GRANTED TO HUNTItiCTON BEACH ON JilNE 25, 1986???????????????•????????????????9 I would like a follow up to my letter as I would Like to know who really awns for court. i Exhibit 118" copy op page 214 -Business license a{cached. I apology for my typing but my left wrist is not completely healed tt and I am typing with cne hank SJxcerely, Lucille D. Ropers 8081 Holland Circle Apt. 5,_f Huntinpton Beach, Ca. 92647 (714•) 841-2 973 . (2) 44 a-- --� City of Huntington Beach i•'. a' ` 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92OU ca` 'y' '' OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1 March 1801986 Mrs. Lucille Rogers 8081 Holland, i;5F Huntington Beach, California 92647 Dear Mrs. Rogers: Your request to City Council regarding the banners and nags displayed at Oakwood Apartments, 6700 Warner, was referred to me for follow-up and response. An Inspection of that property had been made on January 10, 10860 by our Land use staff. At that time they were advised that a permit was required for display of banners and flags and that a request for such a permit should be filed within five (5)days of that Inspection. • C ry 16, 1986, a second Inspection was made and the banners had not been removed request for a permit been filed. The problem was then forwarded to the office on February.3, 1986, and a notice of possible prosecution teas sent out on 7, 1986, to Oakwood's management firm. As is our normal praeedure, the nt firm was given time to cornply. 1n this case they were required to bring ers and flags into compliance by March 5, 1986, or appear at the City Attorney's explain why they had not. Cthe arch 5, 1926, the Oa woo partment's management filed a request with the Board oning Adjustments (RZA) to display their banners and flag. The BZA decided at that that since there was a chg= in ownership of these apartments they.would permit anners and flags to remain an additional 30 days until April 4, 1986, at which tim. will have to be removed. I hope this Information responds to your request. if there are any other questions please feel free to c!ortf:;rt me or you may prefer to speak directly with our Land Use Staff at 536-5271. Thank you for your interest. Yours truly, WtL ') rf jRichard Barnard 7f ' 1 Assistant to the City Administrator RB:paj 41406a xc: City Council City Administrator Telephone f 14) 536-5202 BOARD On n,)• of 1luntingtun I:.1"h we DE%'1a.,,t'.%I!'N'I'Sb.lt%'1(:ES DEPT. ZONING AD J 3 t„J 1 1 STMIENT P.O. Box 190 1j Ihuttiu;tuo Itcach, Gtlif. 92648 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: (714) 536.5271 r,utinactoMPACO DIM TVt'I:OP VF III[UN S FEE CASH NUMBER Applicant or Autthuracd Ascnt 11•t P:rnsit UP -- bO C AV( , Conditional fs:eptiun CI: Alai ie6 AJJras Nor Plan Amendment IPA .%drninistritive I(evicw Alt e cp ara Nurnbeir npet y wnet �. i Q Ownershipcerification Ve Alai inrAJdttu letter of Authorization Irnrt a sl Board Action D-atet Commission Action Date: ❑Approved ❑ Sustained BZA IIIINTIiIG1UW BCACII ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved C3 Denied O Approved DEVELOPMEW SERVICES C7 Withdrawn ❑ Withdrawn O'Referred to P.C. ❑ Referred back to HZA FEB 1 j�Da Appc+led: Yes 0 No 0 Appealed: Yes U No ❑ (natc tilcdl • • r "OTItI TO PERMIT: ('015 Cach. CA 920 i PURSUANT TOt ..._ IN LIEU Upt PPA Previous Caset LOCATION OF PR08ERTYt CA P AINS•—W • 1. Street Addresst ` 2. Side of street? 46 ah j 3. Distance from nearest intersecting street: 4. Name of nearest intersecting street: fLEGAL DESCRIPTION (Assessor's itarcel number ! 1. Lot Block Tract Section Tcwnship Range ..or 2. Metes and Bounds: JUSTIFICATION: (Fill in eompletety;attach ad,litianel;beets trecrss rrv) AR or PPAt State reasons for this request and length of time requested for use. Permission is requested to, fly our :•flags. and.'post our, banners :for for tha.--.fallowing reasons: See Attached. UP: State reasons why the establishment,maintemnce,or operation of the use or building applied for will not be detri- mental to: 1)the general welfare of persons resin' ng or working in the vicinity,or 2) injurious to property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. See at;tached. .__._ CE: The objective of a-conditional exception is to ichieve parity and not to gtant special priv:lcgc. When considering properties in the vicinity and under an Wentiralone classification,please respond to the following$ 1. What exceptional cinurnuances apply to petitioned property(including size,shape,topography,location or ! surroundings)that deprive it of privileges normally enjoyed? See attached. 2. Will the Conditional Exception constitute x grant of special privilege inconsistent with'normal limitations? See attached. 3. Why is this Conditional Exception necessary for the preser-ration and enjoyment of one or more substantial property,rights? , See attached. 4. State reasons why the granting of this Conditional Exceptinn will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare. See attached. Parse F�'}}tt 1, ... Iyedmpr* tv AXC-4- , hav understand all statements including the Supplement-to- utPetitton on the reverse side of this application. 1 am the p city otvn r r huriz ent of subject property. )hereby declare (affirm)under penalty of perjury that the foregoing state znt,facts,a at a hed p re true an�J ML Z Signature at: rmperty O�w�neerr��� or nRton Ajcn t)atc !t-FM-t01I `cedes►a tV ' ;- 4.1/ I Minutes, H. B. Board of zoning Adjustments i March 5, 1986 Page 3 AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT:' Krejci ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-16 Applicant: Oakwood Apartments A request to maintain existing banners and flags within an apartment development. Subject property is located at 6700 Warner Avenue (South side of Warner Avenue approximately four hundred feet (4001 ) East of Edwards Street) . This request- is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. According to Staff, this property is zoned R3 and there currently are apartments on the, site. The applicant is requesting permission to maintain banners and flags until all apartments, are occupied. - Staff noted that there will usually be vacan,.ies in apartment complexes so Staff did not feel the Board should allow such a stipulation; however, Staff did recommend approval for allowing the banners and flags to remain in place for a period of thirty '(30) rapproval; s from the date of approval, at which time they must be re ur er :.ecommen a re r ng proper s ree a cat on oL a tion of Warner Avenue within ten (.10) days of the date of or, if this dedication is not accomplished within the pcified- time,. it would ElCc ge o evoca�' dm' stratve Review Staff a so mentioned ese anners and flags j Z��7iFHi s a e s an advertising medium when the apartmentx changed from Apple Apartments to Oakwood Apartments. Daryl Smith asked why Staff was recommEn ing street dedication now since the apartment complex had been in existence for many years. Les Evans ex�pl..��a.ined that_a_gJther Cit�_records_4oc the County, `\Assessor's Office records_ i iiif;_ated recordation di�r of s Fr ''3eat-ion --far this area of Warner Avenue, and that should be accomplished as part of this approval. Mr. Smith then asked if the applicant--had been notified of this requirement in writing and Staff replied they had not. Dennis Krejci arrived at the meeting at this point - 1:40 P.M. The applicant 's representative, Bob Miller, was present and stated he was Manager of the property. He further stated. this complex presently had ,a higher vacancy rate than other apartments in the area, thus the need for an advertising campaign through the use of banners and flags. Mr. Miller also mentioned they had already changed some flags they had installed to the American flag and the Stale of California flag, and had ordered a City of Huntington Beach -- flag which would be installed as soon as received. --3-- j 3/5/86 - BZA F �►10t S Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 51 1986 Page 4 Tom Poe asked the applicant 's representative if it was their intention to leave these flags in place and Mr. Miller said they would like to do so. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO: 86-16 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . The existing banners and flags, as shown on photographs dated February 18, 1986, shall be permitted for a period of thirty (30) days from date of approval . 2. All banners, pennants and flags shall be removed by April 4 , 1986. 3. No banners, pennants or flags shall be installed on the subject property without prior Board of Zoning Adjustment approval. 4. Proper street dedication along Warner Avenue shall be made within ten (10) days of date of approval. M 5. Any violation of the aforementioned conditions shall be cause for revocation of this Administrative Review. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Krejci Mr. Miller then stated this was a new experience for him and asked exactly what the Hoard had approved. Staff explained the flags and banners would be allowed to remain in place through April 4, 1986 , at which time everything would have to be removed except for official United States, State of California, and City of Huntington aeach patriotic flags. Les Evans further explained an applicant can reapply at the end of a six months period for a new approval under a new entitlement but there would be no assurance of approval by the Hoard at that time. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 86-2 Applicant: Lyle Beutler A request to adjust property lines between a Second Floor condominium unit (air space) and common open space area of a condominium development . Subject property is located at 16202 i Mariner Drive (North side of Mariner Drive approximately twelve hundred feet (1,2001 ) East of Pacific Coast Highway) . -4-- 3/5/86 - BZA . A.J4 1165-051-02 RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BF ACH And when raoonW mail to City Clerk City of Huntington Reach P.0.Box 190 Huntington Beach,California 02648 g oe abure thi,tin.for Rrewdar'a qua EASEMENT DEED 71»wadartitfae l paelw(a)dodwe(r): A140, Ji 73 S- Dav"aaLary tr&Ww las is S ( ) comprted an tau FEW of vwrwy=4vo1w,or ( ) apeler Litt foil row two solve of liw"A•a obratta.t tope Vh%at tiro of MAC om ( ) uslaeort+wuwl we: ( ) City of wad FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,receipt of whieb it hereby acknowledged, � ]?Af?PIItCXE.S, IJVC. do hereby GRANT to the CITY OF 1IUN71NGTOIY BEACH,a municipal Corp aratioq,a perpetual e&aament and right of way for public street and public utility pwrpdsea in, on, over, under and acroa all that real property in the CITY OF lfUNTINGTON BEACH, County of Orange, State of Catliforrtia,described as fallowel The north 30.00 feet of parcel 1 as shown as a map recorded in book 34, page 14, Parcel Maps, records of said county. I� i - E %J I , path r� IFD PROPERTIES, INC._— FIRST. a annec l.cu ) STATE OF wR te,. Delaware Corporation COUNTY of H._.,a7.r nrd w On Jun: 251286 By: t.�...� •.r+-.r ., battye nw,the uo%"llpita/,a Netwy Pubile In and fa ald Sute,p+.Richard If. Chase. Vice President SWAY oppmvd parwtway Wwww to ma lac pier to tm on the baoia of eatietwswy erideewl to he the pwunld wham momlt? Wsti wbaslbed to the within inatntnwot ame 84kno,v4djud to me that ha/gWlthey esaeutad the eenN. WITNESS my h&M wW*hisW nW. Gayle A. Brown My commission expires: 3/31/89 (n6&Mfw0IlkWnot+rWasal) .. ALICIA M. ti'%1`iTi r-Pu- L' r-. L�• 1 MTY or UUNTIZIGTON QEAC!, OFFICE OF TH: : CITY C!ER't •� HUt,titr;AT C^,Lip. �2c43 o?f �' • f • ;A. / :'• ��z�/190 85-Q3�478 "•s Recorded at th repast d rccr not�+t a►a uu►. RECORDING REQUESTV) BY 800 JAN3119a5 AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TOs AM p"*•�K�'^ Adams, Duque i Hazeltine 323 West Sixth Strent Los Angeles, California 90014 f. Attentions Alan Wayte, Esq. } MAIL TAX STATEMENT'S TOs CIGNA Financial Partners, Inc. c/o R i B Apartment Management Companyy 2222 Corinth Avenue Los Angeles, California 90264 V` Attentions Herbert Y. Rosenblum , 2 f 1 ' GRANT DEED %1 Pi L s'- �l•i-oY IAr p_pT~ FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, IFD PROPERTIES, INC. - FIRST, a Delaware corporation ("Grantoc•), hereby granta to CALIFORNIA SEVEN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Califatnia limited partnership ("Grantee"), the real property (the "Land") located in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as snore particularly described In Exhibit A attached hereto and 5y this reference incorporated herein, together with all right, title and interest of Grantor in and to all buildinqu and Improvements now located or hereafter constructed on the Land. .l IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Grant Deed as of January 3j, 1905. IFD PROPERTIES, INC. - FIRST, " a Delaware corporation •i By Philip'J. a'is Its Vice-President Vy Johcs A. Shaw Y Its Assistant Secretary i ;r f WUL T:9 STATEMENTS Art WRECTED ADOPT f� r i I § 7-9.291 PLANNING 7-9.295 eSubdivision Committee altall take i) Public utility easements; (d) 1'h ( � specific action on each requested deviation. Deviations not specifically approved shall be (j) Public transit facilities; considered to be disapproved. (Ord. No. 3106, 4 2, 12-12.78; Ord. No. 3350, § 17, 10-12.82) (k) Other public easements; Sec.7.9 292. Floodpla L (1) Access:vays to the shoreline or to lakes and Areas proposed nor subdivision In floodplains, reservoL-s as provided In sectiom 7.9.2S6, as defined by section 7.9.27,shall comply with 7.9.287 and 7.9.288. (Ord. No. 3105, 3 2, the following: 12-12.78; Ord. No. 3350, 3 18, 10-12.82) (n) All subdivision proposals shall be consistent Sec.7.9.296. Transfer of ownership required] with the need to minimize flood damage. for private use or benefit. The Subdivision Committee may require (b) All subdivision proposals shall have public (that) the Items listed in section 7.9-295 be utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, deeded for private use or benefit to a home- electrical and water systems located and owners' association or other responsible body. constructed to minimize flood damage. (Ord. No. 3106, § 2, 12.12-78; Ord. No. 3350, § 19, 10-12.82) (c) All subdivision proposals -,hall have adequate drainage provided to reduce ex. Sec.7.9.297. Vehlculsr access rights and posuwe to flood damage. abutters'rights to arterial highways and local streets. (d) Base flood elevation data shall be provided Whenever specified by the Subdivision Com- for subdivision proposals and other pro- mittee, offers of dedication of arterial highways posed development. (Ord. No. 3156, § or transportation corridors shall include the 'l,9.5-79) release and relhtquishment of vehicular access rights to and from such facilities from any prop. Secs. 7.9.293,7.9.294. Deserved, erty shown within a final tract or parcel map abutting thereon. When the local agency finds Subarticle 7. Dedication that there is a particular circulation problem on a local street, release and relinquishment of Sec.7.9.295. Required dedication for public access rights to and from said local street may be use or benefit. required. (Ord.. No. 3106, $ 2, 12.12-78; Ord. The Subdivisinn Committee may require the No. 3350,§ 20,10.12.82) dedication to the public, to the County of Orange or to such other public agency as may be Sec.7.9.298. Elementary school sites. appropriate (of) all real property (or Interest The subdivider submitting a tentative tract therein) both on and off site required for public map may be required to dedicate land for the use or benefit, including but not limited to the elementary school facilities necessary to assure following: the residents of the subdivision adequate public school service in accordance with the require- (a) Local streets, arterial highways and trans ments and procedures sP: forth in the Subdivi. portation corridors; sion Mup Act. Whenever the Subdivision Com- mittee imposes such a dedication requirement, it (b) Alleys; may concurrently approve an alternate tentative map, to he effective in the event the school tits- (c) Trails, paths and pedestrian ways; trict affected does not enter Into a binding commitment within thirty (30) days to accept (e) Flood-control facilities; the dedication. A dedication pursuant to this section shall only be required at the request (f) Parks; of a school district made within twenty (20) :corking days of the notice given pursuant to (h) Easements for landscaping maintenance; section 7-9.24S. (Ord. No. 3106, 1 2,12.12.75: Ord.No. 3350, 1 21. 10.12.82) Sapp. Nil :1 t 2336.15 1 i 7.9.299 ORANGE, COUNTY COD.. 7.9-305 See. 7.9.239. Method of dedication. Except as otherwise specified in section 7.9:303 Dedications and offers of dedication shall be (c), the certificate shill include n requirement made by a certificate on the final tract or parcel for fuffil_'-rent of such improvements prior to map. Separate Instrumenu may be used with Issuance of any building permit or other grant the approval r,f the Director, when permitted by of approval for development of the parcel,or for la%v and when the subdivider Intends to dedicate installatica of tlic improvements at such earlier or offer for dedication real property prior to the time as pro-rded in the agaement. approval of a final tract or parcel map. (Ord. No. 3100,1 2, 12-12.78) (b) The agreement required by section 7.9.306 Chill be entered into prior to the Sec.7.9.300. Exceptions. County S=eyor's approval of the parcel map Dedications required by section 7.9.295 shall for recordation, or prior to granting a walver of not be required for any remainder parcel which the paretic =zp. Except as otherwise specified in is sufficient as to size and shape to be further section 7.9-303(c). the agreement shall provide divided In compliance with applicable zoning for Installation of the impro-ements prior to the regttlations provided the Subdivision Committee granting of any building permit or other grant determines that such dedications and improve- of apptoval for development of the parcel, or meras are not necessary Immediately for public for the lm a!lsttion of the improvements at such use or benefit and that the property owner will earlier time as provided In the agreement. not be e:.cused from a requirement to dedicate and insta necessary improvements at a later (c) The requirements for installation of the 'ime. (Orel. No. 3106, $ 2, 12.12.78; Ord. No. improvements prior to issuance of building 3350. 1 22, i J-12.82) permits may be omitted from a parcel mep when such a requirement is not a condition of Sec. 7.9.301. Reserved. approval of the parcel map or waiver of parcel map. (Oril No. 3106, § 2, 12.12.78;Ord. No. Subarticle 8. Improvements, 3350,3 24, 10-12.82) -lonumentation and Security Sec.7.9.304. Standards. ` Sec. 7.9.302. Improvements required. Improvements shall be designed and con- 1 (a) The subdivider shall grade and improve ,strutted In accordance with the standards of or agree to grade and'U nprove all land shown on desibm contained in Subadicle 6 of this article, the final tract or parcel map for those dedica. the Stand:.d Plans, and any other applicable tions listed in section 7.9.295 in crnpUance standards adopted by the Orange County Board ttith the requirements of theapprova*, tentative of Supersiscrs, (Ord. No. 3106, 3 2, 12.12-78) map in such a manner and with s•.%h Improve- ments au are necessary for the-gereml use of the Sec.7.9.305. Improvement plans. lot or parcel owners in the subd:vision and local All improvement plans of Improvements to neichbor0ood traffic and dra:rnge needs as a be installed within or supplemental to the I ! condition precedent to ti,r, approval and final tract or parcel map must be approved by acceptance 'of the final trr4-A or parcel map. li I (b) The ,ubdivider may be required to Im• prove or agree to improve those dedications which ar-- necessary or convenient to ensure I conformity to of implementation of the General Plan. (Ord. No. 3106, 4 2, 12.12.78;Ord. No. I 3350, 3 23, 10-12.82) Sec.7.9.303. Sutxiivisions of four or less parcels. (a) Required improvements shall be noticed j hy a Certificate on the final parcel map or the ' Instrument n•idencing waiver of the parcel map. Supr.No. .ts 2S36.16 ---__----_---- -- --------------- ------ --------------_ -,... vs LB/LOIZO 9 9t6f63V SL'Ltt •IVO N3Ao934313 3 "IeZ 3 D.,wocaKsn:r a31mV330.; 1S3'1lf30109 46L91 NOt! r�• ,,. !^ltnytir5 ti ty�t.ny r+i'�L .21W1 3nteVY31^�••32-tt2tL'+ .� a _L 1J L?l1CI40 S 9Lit'I'JY 05,11 1Y 13 1133 1A3:1 171 .+YHY87 Z7SSt 3r3f+Sl'10JS =aIVNV33C 43 LBItrl t0 f IOUSOV 00"? NUMEJ Y'I6 3flllS16K3 67a N1R:31?HIN SLS L,OtIYN 3Civ='7337 q _1- 22 ^L-3=-.--z �� to ryR --UJ32H 6.L °ILR12131:iti-;7,-.t7.� ' +1 ; �= a3 C31 LC/10 Z 72i7O0Y 00'7? 4VLSOY6 K HDOI3" LS7 1SY43 3t313Yd OL1 . S2N3ii18VdY 3AYA, Ntl330'r,`„r 113 toIL11FO £ 7LZSZOV 05'L£ 1HVIO301 lYd/38f 6LE S08YfiO3 Z993t S310Yi5 n3iA;N�Y330 �:y�c`�1 e:. � n e e e 4n� n t�,s t C t n_gu r.a w�i1 f "�--1-]-Z3.Y•1-1t71.l11R01-!Gs2 2L t B.; � _ it3 2tt-1>.?-I-ti-u�•= 33 L°/LDJZO 7 OS9ZOtY 1di1312 1N39Y IIY101360 ti NVO t6Z 51113 LSO/ S31VIS3 431A MV330 I 491L3/LL 4 2SlMV D6*11 flosa..0R1 V011911SY14 t92 0 1ZNn •S3'18Ylt 1404 LtQcnVl NI03 A31A UW330 �� •��f +11� �r 14-3; y 1{_jc �SiaS ald3ZA t"yn '!s `:i=4d1--.1.4 zt•:-.L--'S•Sa1n4-4t z J& LS/t0/ZO 7.•75EZ90Y SZ:t7 13UYL'9 ! 139YY9 9ft' 77L IfUn IVS109 ZSLS tit SS31111Vi8 31YSS "1Y?] I !` AY 12/t011O t' CUUeV 05'41 •'31iaY7 141I3k SIL 314GONIXAS U-�Z965 t Cil SSIOds rtY;]o 7 n .31 t nj,%n f Sier n. !! nr'tt na,�!{'luu n �1yH}l�!-LJ2 "iS�f~.�A t-L-lt:�i-14Y-iU13-fry-?x-1-Z:Y� YY 13I0190 S L•l?£0LV ;S't£ 14WO122 k 130V 67E KlN33i%3A3S LOf 13- :lntF 31JI3Yd t+Y33 1;i l'sitV 13 L 021i53Y OS'li 1t13 �31DNV42 AM Z77 YI:lvojllY3 7tn 91W NOIlCA 1: 111. .o .r.•-Ll�.� 1 ,�,ek -.^.�_1S- �+i3Ys1_S--A-i-13:t-L-S7- ilil-tli��i-Ii'•-i►►•'s-3".-- I0 sif►'If9l i Za"L76cl 3S'2£ S3iS3/S3,i9nt4.,IZl SsAl ZZ13 -3NI SUMV30;13 I;V330 ;C 9?1L31LL2i L'77-,!]V '3S'1£ anOd3YAO1SO Y I1V Gnat 433DNI'11 7F37 III' IVAt!vd!!113 3HIV ::C33C i`It r.�_z1.:..'Sl-L.'1-�-;•!;2:1Ls•�31':-r>F:---=•-d-'Y-}!L?l-Sti-I�--x3'}R+a1--i<32 - 'tu?1M1-L-1�L '.1t1�1iL-I'Yz.'1'-�t!•!-u.•-':':?'�1,-��j3+� ' SV APIL0/90 L Z£9567Y OS'1£ dA 331f3 NYOn02a I f Z!Z SSS li in •32L'133 111.1 03 -MINPQ lYlN?91330 43 LS►LUED 7 ZLZZBLY 00.1Z V30 140ZVbO3 t NIA3N 9 Z72 '00YKSii0011 LZ61 3 1 HIA3k D•V30 tq._L:•J401-93-C-91240L_-"L-1L iYAtill27-C iYia3tN_f 74 t1aI -• _---- ��-__•_�_9-liHn_. i11 Y11-_111 L :Gy07>>i-NOIGS3L� 1 Q7 971t,1/7t B C00660v 00'7Z Z103A I WVW3lA0. 27'J V4Y$YlY i121 !: P .i NY1+3190 iH 3] 43lLO101 Z OZOZ23V OS,A SnYHtl300 33Yf 7`1Z Eat Am *104ti n 101t£ .3lYI3tiSSv 7 S11YKii?HO' j' � D-L:L� '�.i11d-1JR�lll3d--•l t-3-YltY-Yl7�-i�ASr-:Iblsli-i]�h-o0_1._�CK?ly►t-n111%4iu(r -ei.c}n- . •,� - lK Iq�L►Jfc� L "OOtt19Y 00'Oo _dallS r UA31A Z'32 11ID]0+t WLt 91ttm3iv3 SISVO �. v^sl1O121 A 9F926Dv O0 y-<7's•t tlOS1A0Y 171ldd YttD Ol _ b3f:ltyll OOt' 9 CO•• 0! r }IaT�ElAk -Ya_dY3-IiYT.f-LY5�-OLz43nDI4-fit?[+- -r 40 LB/LO/70-O:fl21#210 'OS:LF �•rS31Y9 .2• NoRb3it 5S NYi!?tt211 it>b,' ]►fI 3AOaD7Y, - _:, SY 73/LOItI Q:IIQL7f0Y:05'1£ :�'" '131NQtIKY7. O S3L:V!'S17 'YYdM71 Zit6 311! 33i12 %SC' �g ' .-'.=7 e7-l-t..11-t-L--l�•-7.Las'��ti-ILS=•t•:--=--' .,�.y•.r 1 3.1+•2Y 03 LSM,11 LO £ 6LZF63V 0 1Yi3 9f:vn ] A ZLZ �tYJ ZtZL t dIHSa3Niavd xIV � 5+ 9SlLC/Zt 9 ZL£930Y OS'Li a3121Iri isn3 ZbZ 9 11,�n •oCnocib 13C?t 18317Ni 3enjINfni ::tlt Q -s N•--0 ;'►'mow=> tL -�t+I�tse--Nit-lkl►rl-lv3-c4' .4-541•Gd-t-ki-f-3ilof)C,hOad-SSf li--F- £. t.'. V9 L$I.t0Iz0 d 71tflQ1Y'0�71£:' '' ,113NOO it I 9.L72 t''SIM430107 77151 all S•113H•D ?a Y] 1Sf/L0150 0 9L7f90v.OS'1L ON A113x.a U 31:vi!!:£SZ.. 'a7f 11t;n •H3V30 ZZ;Z& 3NI AN :INYi:! A11351.0 i e _ •!�}'X-1-Y�:�`�t-�-�'r11c-?1-?-•u.:s��--�+ri�Y-3�-Ftfu?i'�.c��?3p':s�-'�' ' 33 17/tO120 a 7016L0Y O5't£ 113NN00.0 NA'IIIlV..11i0a 19t xt+Yl ILE99 f 1a3�0a 11'agH00.0 IC LS/LLt/£0 Z s9Z&Sav a5lL£ 113N400 0 f 1i13nob L9L XYY1 LLi•4t s7virl L, f K 11?M4CO.0 g:vi�=r-_r-vE77a-y 15 1- liaitl{00c{-l-li$Y$-4!'l -BJOc±�Y:1]-2?7.Z mod]l-kqY$-117kNOfri4-�� 33 L$►to►SR 3•Gil£b0Y aS�l£ ; ::.:� VONN0]so',r..13YH3111'997r.,. HYtSNl15 t?3G S3IDD10h11]31 CDHNO3.0 r{_{'••t to 42 Wlb0 6 116SfltOV 00.:S4:., ,- % 113NN03iO R V3 YNY VLNIS •1. 31YA LZ6t•HIYM 3dY3SOkYl ll3kNO3.0 Ysf�n 0-- =-=T=is�rr=ii---=J.aS#�}Y-}-K}-'k'�:;-`. 1M�Iji Y}-1139-4elR�EI1N+►+1-�?.£-`It�f'-+---- S�ti•!}-S1-JItCt!_.!'. .. h�;1S1 =7 93It012L 6 ^L9160Y OS'La Y] N}Y38 I:Odr3!t rtli2 �00 f•k0I1}tl±<15N07 t1Yf1!1YllY3.8 13 031Ofat L :ZZON4 0017Z N3I13060 NObvHsrOrollln 6SE 111N37lL•:103 5flf H71fYHSfOtlOflln 113INF•C -•tr--r�tCi-ii,--,t-zib�h-?:-_O�L� ---"3•t�i�.o--i:I-f-S•i;. - --. ---Sidi-3.ni+e-2-9f-o--3)1Ay35-trrS-t-700d-ttTl.ytt 6S Z?lt0110 t 71SZ6"_Y t?S.:lC H3Ifd0a0 f 'd• 97L' .3rnl3YJnHV4 72b51 :3SIada3lH3;H3iat1.O,�;t� , . Aft aII1tfl16L' 6.866ffl0Y•Q5:1£ "•• ' '' Y] 03SI34VSJ HYS OS .•3AY OF:Ya9 3 OS7• 3HS :_�� aaaaa:aaa Las asaa a a sa sasaaia aaaaas as1saL9IIla al as as asas afaarOa rrza a a r4 an isa 22=22 va cc!aas man s=a=sas33a a cc==a saw a slaasaaas a as a asa dAl 37lldA3 03.3:N33I1 33/ 1vnNNY a013Iadodd sea SS3a00Y c 3kvti RIM c c ...• - a3iSt93tI.S53N1Sntl A113t; 7tZ0 !,39Ydf 4P/0tl60 H 3 Y 3 9 N a 1 9 N I 1 H n H ! 0 1 1 1 3 ZO-191n J '""'•'•" �-.mot., �.�......'�.�.��.�. '�_.__ _ __ �_^_-� '.._._�..�._..�.t_ _` _ _ _.__..._.. . .,UNTINGTON BEACH CHAMC A of COMMERCE SEACLIFF VILLAGE,2213 MAIN, !t 32 HUNTINGTON REACH,CA 92648 TELEPHONE(714)536.8888 low-lea? EXECUTNE COMMRTEF �WASM April 2, 1986 Yna Broadway VAN Pmaws"t aeu,K cuwsa►+ MciXems Dovpiaa/4tr rwut= vtorMowant Mr. Robert Mandic, Mayor � kokarotawnGlownia City of Huntington Beach yka Pruftw 2000 Main Street snvewoLm Huntington Beach, CA 92648 soon st croo inane•AQvW vto PraaPAW FYoaaaYAM Dear Mayor Mandic: ► einown Roach CWNWV MUMA F&WXWW The proposed Sign Ordinance draft was carefully reviewed by our Conif"PLOAcAamoun m Board st their March 27 taceting. A,"ter a report from our Sign j &W400MW~ Ordinance Task Force, examination of a detailed comparison chart ') JOYC ROOM prepared by Chamber staff on the current Sign Code and the proposed Few MUM C.&I8J)M draft, and review of the Final Draft dated March 4, 1986, our °"'l0vn OFDIR ewfocos TORS Board could not nupport all aspects of the proposed ordinance. BOARD OF DIRECTORS JR AAAruaoa AaSSOCAlaa The Board is in agreement that signs which currently are illegal JU104aM.SAME should cone down and that the current Sign Code adopted in 1977 AMy" smI" should be enforced. Board members questioned however tha reaaoning EPAAStu�P"fiiytt taCarnat and direction behind the numercus other changes in the proposed su COVPMN sign code amendmenr. City staff cited the communities of Fountain ' aaAMmCabon+FaEdlawCo Valley and Irvine as examples of desirable sign codes. Our Board ROBERT uwn<s feels that our community has its own unique character and that the esthetic standards of other cities, especially cities that are Hubvim %VvvgALon some 47 and 67 years younger respectively, are not necessarily , .*.)MFARIS appropriate here in Huntington Beach. soun+.en Cowan%as caWAOMM J A t°w�a 6ardeaa A sign cede not only regulates esthetics of a community but also JEWY"vw has a profound economic effect on business. especially small PHILP .Ptau business' whose sign is often their only means of advertising. ,H;,tiae OAAk In a study done by the National Research Service of 3M National HANKATZ and the Institute of Signage Research in cooperation with the busM»aabDwhetaMapatlne U.S. Small Business Administration in Lubbock, Texas, 1979, the s.a,rnysaoa.r.a average cost.to conform to a new sign ordinance was $639.00. ' AoxA�aw�acQ.owutsrr Total compliance costs for 318 businesses were estimated conserv- Fobdc"r inft. atively at a total of $53,680.00. *Wc must consider that small WNPANKHMO independent businesses must compete against national advertisers OOfeidµPW&KCLU. and name brands. On-premise signs are the most cost effective and M�PLinkod affordable way to advertise. In addition, signs are a vital ! FRANK/JCHMOND communication link between business and current and potential j rfamo w customers. We nded to be fully aware of the economic implications HOWA� of restricting signage. Care should be taken because the economic T11900M tMV health of the community and its businesses are directly involved. F*�nycn.01w Ina telephone survey, conducted by Chamber staff, focusing on the CAAMIANNWA►1. automobile dealers--who are among the largest sales tax generators ftZIOanM"n'sP43ix+ in the city--the survey supported the importance of signage to 7 FORM MOUSE businesses. Car dealers felt that signage in addition to pennants DOM Camorafkm Mayor Robert Mand..- April 2, 1986 Page Two and flags, caused out of town customers to shop here in Huntington Beach. Also, they stated that they already have a difficult time competing with the new out of town auto centers. fIt is impossible to comment on all concerns in this letter. Enclosed is the comparison chart used by our Board to review changes. I think it will point out the number of minor and major changes being proposed. While we understand these new standards will apply only to new signs (or old signs which never complied with the 1977 sign code), we believe each revision should serve a clear purpose rather than simply follow a notion that smaller/lower signs are "better" signs. The one idea that became evident to us as we studied this issue was that (within reason) a well designed sign appropriate for its location and purpose is almost always better than a poorly designed sign even if amaller or lower. We sincerely appreciate the time of city staff and planning commission members who worked with us on this issue. We also appreciate their responsiveness to our concerns by adopting some of our suggestions in the areas of establishing a minimum for planned sign programs, clarification of the permitting process and the "grandfather clause" in the amortization provision. We welcome the opportunity to discuss this item furthsr. I Sincerely, Larry Was7h President LW:kb cc: Charles Thompson, City Administratir Tom Livengood, Chairman, Planning Commission .Tames Palin, Director, Dept. of Development Services Enclosure t 1 1 i .... •.r:•'a.. ..-..11'..,. ... .... .., .. »_..._... . ... ,.. ..,........ .. _...s:.. .. 'a:_. ....�.. .._.•._...�_�.._.�..___...-�.....�..nt7i:;t:':J:LSi�' : -�j City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92OU I OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR January 2, 1986 Mr. Roger CoIE, Vice President Trinidad Island Homeowner's Association P.O. Box 1761 Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Cole: Your letter to Mayor Mandie regarding advertiarig signs along the public right-of-way h+is been referred to me for follow-up and reply. According to our Land Use staff, the city has recently decided to take a more active approach to eliminating unwanted signs on the public right-of-way. The following Is the � outline for this program. ILLEGAL SIGN REMOVAL PROGRAM 1. Initially all signs on utility poles, medians, parkways, sidewalks, traffic and directional signals and control boxes throughout the City will be removed by thQ Department of Public Works crews. II. Once City is cleared of signs, Land Use Technicians will monitor: a) As new signs go up, Land Use Technicians can do one or more of the following: ' _ j; 1) Remove all signs, identify owner of signs and bill responsible party for costs Incurred for removal. 2) Remove one sign (of many the same) and telephone sign r owner or send letter and advise owner to remove all signs placed throughout the City within determined Amount of time or face prosecution. 3) Once a month have signs removed by City crews (Public Works). i III. Educate Huntington Beach citizens via newspaper on new sign "Clean-Up Campaign". Enlist citizen participation by advising ' neighbors, etc. when they see people putting up signs. ' Telephone (714) 536.5202 . 1 � Roger Cole January 2, 1986 '?age -2- If you have any questions on this program, you may wish to contract our Development Services, Land Use Division at 960.8626 or please feel free to contact me at anytime. Sincerely, 4-1 . _ Rich Barnard, Assistant to the City Administrator RB:Pa j #85-412 xcs City Council City Administrator s I f f. t it 1 AA ` , TRINIDAD ISLAND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 1761 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIF. 92647 TRINIDAD ISLAND t December 20, 1985 Mayor Robert Mandic City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Mandic: This letter concerns the posting of advertising signs on both private property and along public right of ways in our City. Our Homeowners Association has for some time successfully kept Trinidad Island free of such signs, and I was pleased to note from recent newspaper articles that other areas are becoming more militant about controlling signs as well. Our Association can, o.1' courage, do nothing about signs in areas adjacent to Trinidad Island, and we seem to be seeing more and more of them at; lack of enforcement of current restrictions encourages further violations. For example, Huntington Beach residents have been treated on about a monthly basis to the sight of literally hundreds of "I Go 2 You For Auto Detail" signs posted on u'sility poles along the length of Edinger and on several other streets as well. In this area of Huntington Beach we also see a sprouting of "Faire Marin" and 'Portifino Cove" signs each weekend. Trinidad Island re.iidents would appreciate any effort you might make to bring the posting of advertising signs under control. Sincerely, r IC e-e Ro r C�1� Chairmen, Architectural Review Committee, Trinids:d Island Homeowners Association l i i I, 1 i i i i y i VATE ZAPfML MUIT'EES SAZAAMENTo CA JFCANU 95E'a Fra t� Ana rnfurfnct r' ,EL W$1s "02 •••� at..nat Ana•t•a`gR.'Ji.tit..rnf 04sn>C'OFFKE "'��,' w, iLBCOMMiTTEES qas HALE YERVi AVENUE • ++o qr� hiM am u..nf S�.aean�+ratt ?OJ L' 'EL .r•a 11SJr t' n' w kr onuron Cv*ue BEACH :AUF0ANN"*5 ar'dA SuDC :11#9}0fa 7n ETey"Ca*D.104WA vue a � DENNIS BROWN ASSEMBLYMAN, FIFIY'EIGHTr4 'DISTRICT ' December 13F 1985 i The Honorable Ruth S. J Councilwoman, City of Huntington Beach ' C,rQ��r!' - tip 2000 Main Street • co�;� l�:M111�,g Huntington Beach, California 92648 `:=�• Dear Ruth: - �''� Enclosed is a letter I received from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) regarding the feasibility o, installing a controlled traffic signal at the intersection of r. Pacific Coast Highway and Mariner Drive. ' As you may know, Mr. R.C. Gallyon, President of the Huntington Marina Association, has been in contact with my office regarding this issue and I have also sent him a copy of Caltrans' correspondence. In my letter to Mr. Gallyon, I indicated that Caltrans is firm on these conditions being met prior to moving forward with a signal project. Their correspondence is self-'explanatory and clearly outlines what conditions need to be met in order for a signal to be installed at this intersection. I thought this would be of interest to you and should you have any questions on this issue, please do not hesitate to call me. May I take this opportunit.r to wish you and your family a happy holiday season and a very happy and healthy new year. Most cordially, DENNIS BROWN bB:11 m •, cc; The Honorable Robert P. Mandic, Mayor Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA--OUSINESS AND TRANSVI..0 r TION AGENCY GEONGE DEUKMEJIAN. G2rerF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT 7. ►o. &OX 2104, LOS ANGELES 90051 (213) 620-3874 � October 4, 1985 7-ORA- 1 31. 44 Pacific Coast Highway i at Mariner Drive Honorable Dennis Brown Assemblyman, 58th District 1945 Palo Verde Avenue Suite 203 Long Beach, CA 90815 a Dear Assemblyman Brown: As discussed with Lynn Notrica of your office, we wish to bring you up-to-date as to our present position regarding the possibility of installing a traffic signal at the intersection of I Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and Mariner Drive. Given the existing :intersection configuration and the present traffic volumes, a traffic signal is not warranted at this location. A traffic signal may be warranted if the following modifications were to be made affecting the intersection: 1. A curbed median island must be constructed on Pacific Coast Highway between Mariner Drive and the terminus of the recently constructed median barrier. This would result in requiring southbound PCH motorists making U-turns to safely do so through the signalized intersection. This curbed median islane would prevent left turns into the two driveways for the Mariner's Point commercial building. These driveways would be accessible via U-turns at the intersection. t R L ' r•. Honorable Dennis Brown Page 2 October 4, 1985 I 2. An existing driveway must be opened :.o Mariner's Point from Mariner Drive. This would allow motorists exiting Mariner's Point ground level parking facility to utilize the signalized intersection to proceed southb.ound on PCH. 3 . A portion of Mariner Drive at the intersection must be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach as a public street. This would allow Caltrans to financially participate in the cost of the traffic signal, and would 'guarantee Mariner's Point traffic continued Access to Mariner Drive. 4. The existing landscaped island on Mariner Drive at the intersection should be removed. This will provide easy access to and from the Mariner' s Point driveway and facilitate southbound PCH U-turns. In order for the traffic signal to be warranted and to operate in -� a safe and efficient manner, these conditions will have to be met. It is recognized that some give and take is required of all parties involved to meet these requirements. if you have further questions regarding our position in this matter, please give me a call, or contact C. C. Boyer of my staff at (213) 620-4134. Sincerely, DONALD L. WATSON District Director i 1 3 I ' C.E. MC CUIRE OCTOBER 24,1985 �5��"•�Vo' CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF HINTINGTOtI QEACH, CALIFORNIA a�FRA g CLARK E. "MIKE" MCGUIRE, PARENTS IN ACTION USING TOUGHLOVE b 4r�t YOUTH iN CRISIS YOLNG PERSON'S GROUP and PRESIDENT, HUtiTINGTON CONTINENTAL TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATION 01 SUBJ: ACTIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE ABOVE GROUPS, City Assistance I am addressing this letter to you to explain how the City of Huntington Beach can provide very valuable services to both the organizations I represent at little or no cost to the Tax Payers of the City. The first issues I will address are those relative to the needs of the Huntington Continental Townhouse Association 01, and how the City can aid us in our SAFETY PROGP,AMiS and in our CRIME PREVENTION PROGRAMS. 40) The second issues I will address are the ways the City can be of invaluable assistance to the PARENTS III ACTION LZING TOUGHLOVE GROUP, which is a Parent Support Group, and to the YOUTH IN CRISIS GROUP, which is a Group dedicated to the Youth of Orange County. As Co-Founder and Co-Co-ordinator of these two groups, along with my wife, Kay Sharon McGuire, there are many ways we are helping this community solve a multitude of it's problems. Our ACTIONS are positive, and our RESULTS are recognizable. I feel that you will be amazed at the results we have had in a very short tire, and the benefits to the C:ty and County are unmeasurable. I hope that you will read this communication and realize that we are not just 'another Group out to get into the Cities pocket' , but nave a valuable place in the Community, and are performing a valuable Community service. Our requirements are small , but they can only be filled by YOU, the CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. M—r.. xt r�- ' I E THANK YOU FOP, YOUR CONSIDERATION, `�" � .'"�` 1�Ze a � CLARK E. "MIKE" MCGUIRE - q4U .. •Z � 19792 COVENTRY LAME HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646 it (714) 964-0892 sA� f 19792 COVENTRY LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9254S (714)954-0892 I 1 J 1 OCTOBER 24,1985 'AGE #f2 ISSUES FOR HUNTINGTON CO,ITINE:ITAL TOW311OUSE ASSOCIATION F i 1 . For quite some time, we have requested that the City install some SAFETY SIMS within the complex. The types required, and the reasons are all explained in following paragraphs. 2, STOP SIGNS- We have a very definite need for the placement of these devices at the locations listed below. The reason for this is to : A. Prevent 'drag racing' throughout the complex by ADULTS and TEENAGERS alike. B. There have been numerous incidents when our Children have been threatened by people racing through our streets. THERE ARE LIVES AT STAKE HERE. Our Children are constantly walking to and from the recreational areas and are required to cross the streets to get there. I would hate to see any one of them killed by one of these drivers racing around for 'pleasure' and to 'prove that their car can do it'. C. I had one incident when an automobile, on a dry street, came around the corner and actually HIT the cement steps to my Patio, because he had 'bit off more than he could chew' , and lost the control of his vehicle. I had a vision of a Child being pinned between his car and the steps. D. People have a tendency to be less than courteous about allowing the 'RIGHT OF WAY' to other drivers. We have had accidents which involved a motorist turning a corner too fast and hitting a car backing out of a Carport, because they didn't have to stop, - as there was no STOP SIGN. i 3. CROSSWALKS- We are in DESPERATE NEED of a 'CROSSWALK' on CO3TIHENTAL DRIVE at the area on the WEST END of the island, off BROOKHURST STREET. This is the place the Children, who live on the SOUTH SIDE of CONTINENTAL DRIVE , cross to go home after being at the Play Ground or at the Pool . There have been several people hit by motorists at this location, and a CROSSWALK would have prevented at least some of these incidents. 4. PARKING SPACES MARKED- We do not expect the City to come out and mark the Spaces on our streets for parking. We have a MAIRT NANCE CREW that are more than willing -1—"-`� to do this. All we require is the PERMISSION OF THE CITY, and a TEMPLATE to do the work. WE WILL BUY 01�0. OWN PAINT as specified by the CiLy. 5. BETTER POLICE RESPONSE AND PATROL- As you all are aware of, the Townhouse complex has been a very hiah crime area until about two (2) years ago. This is when the resident's decided to do something about it. We banded together in an effort to get all the 'problem undesirables out' and keep them out. We have been very successful in our efforts. However, there are still a lot of problems which tie ! feel, as TAXPAYERS' , the City could be of more assistance to us with. Some of these ' are listed below: A. The Police response time to 'Life Threatening' situations and ' 'Life Endangering' situations has been LESS 111M DESIRABLE. I know of a situation where a young person was drunk, fell off a bicycle hit on his HEAD, and was totally incoherent. The Police were. and responded in about thirty (30) minutes. Not only wouldn't they assist us with the young iren and call the Paramedics, they refused to take the young man into custody to allow him to receive medical attention. The young man was not related to anyone of us, and we could not reach his Mother. We were panicked. i I A , VIM C.E. MC QUIRE few, J r �, e,� T OCTOBER 24,1985 /( iQl'�oa `�� CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF IIU,4TINGTON BEACII, CALIFORNIA IFRr CLARK E. "MIKE" MCGUIRE, PARENTS IN ACTION USING TOUGHLOVE & YOUTH IN CRISIS YOUNG PERSOW S GROUP and PRESIDENT, IIWITINGTON CONTINENTAL I TOI41IIOUSE ASSOCIAi'I011 01 SUBJ: ACTIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE ABOVE GROUPS, City Assistance I am addressing this letter to you to explain how the City of Huntington Beach can provide very valuable services to Moth the organizations I represent at little or nu cost to the Tax Payers of the City. The first issues I will address are those relative to the needs of the Huntington Continental Townhouse Association 01, and how the City can aid us in our SAFETY PROGRAMS and in our CRIME PREVENTION PROGRAMS. The second issues I will address are the ways the City can be of invaluable assistance to the PARENTS IN ACTION USING TOUGHLOVE GROUP, which is a Parent Support Group, and to the YOUTH III CRISIS GROUP, which is a Group dedicated to the Youth of, .Orange County. As Co-Founder and Co-Co-ordinator of these two groups, alono with my wife, Kay Sharon McGuire, there are many ways we are helping this community solve a multitude of it's problems. Our ACTIONS are positive, and our RESULTS are recognizable. I feel that you will be amazed at the results we have had in a very short time, and the benefits to the City and County are unmeasurable. I hope that you will read this communication and realize that we are not just 'another Group out to get into the Cities pocket' , but have ! a valuable place in the Community, and are: performing a valuable Community service. Our requirements a:a sma11 , but they can only be filled by YOU, the CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. THANK YOU O YCONSIDERATION,OU F R OUR CLARK E. "MIKE" MCGUIRE 19792 COVENTRY LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646 (714) 964-0892 19792 COVENTRY LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646 (714)964-0692 OCTOBER 24,1985 PAGtL #2 ISSUES FOR HU,'ITINGTOtI COATINE;ITAL TOW111OUSE ASSOCIATION #1 1 . For quite some time, we have requested that the City install some SAFETY SIC44S within the complex. The types required, and the reasons are all explained iii following paragraphs. 2. STOP SIGNS- Ile have a very definite need for the placement of these devices I at the locations listed below. The reason for this is to : A. Prevent 'drag racing' throughout the complex by ADULTS and TEENAGERS alike. 0. There have been numerous incidents when our Children have been threatened by people racing through our streets. THERE ARE LIVES AT STAKE HERE. Our Children are constantly walking to and from the recreational areas and are required to cross the streets to get there. I would hate to see any one of them killed by one of these drivers racing around for 'pleasure' and to 'prove that their car can do its. 1 C. I had one incident when an automobile, on a dry street, came around the corner and actually HIT the cement steps to my Patio, because he had 'bit off more than he could chew' , and lost the control of his vehicle. I had a vision of a Child being pinned between his car and the steps. D. People have a tendency to be less than courteous about allowing the 'RIGHT OF WAY' to other drivers. We have had accidents which involved a motorist turning a corner too fast and hitting a car backing out of a Carport, because they didn't have to stop, _ as there was no STOP SIGN. 3. CROSSWALKS- We are in DESPERATE NEED of a 'CROSSWALK' on COATINENTAL DRIVE at the area on the WEST END of the island, off BROOKHURST STREET. This is the place the Children, who live on the SOUTH SIDE of CONTINENTAL DRIVE, cross to go home after being at the Play Ground or- at the Pool . There have been several penple hit by motorists at this location, and a CROSSWALK would have prevented j at least some of these incidents. 4. PARKING SPACES I.1ARKED- We do not expect the City to come out and mark the Spaces on our streets for parking. We have a MAINTENANCE CREW that are more than willing G to do this. All we require is the PERMISSION OF THE CITY, and a TEMPLATE to do I the work. WE WILL BUY OUR 01,111 PAINT as specified by the City. 5. BETTER POLICE RESPONSE AND PATROL- As you all are aware of, the Townhouse complex has been a very high crime area until about two (2) years ago. This is when the resident's decided to do something about it. We banded together in an effort to get all the 'problem undesirables out' and keep them out. We have been very successful in our efforts. However, there are still a lot of problems which we feel, as TAXPAYERS' , the City could be of more assistance to us with. Some of these are listed below: A. The Police response time to 'Life Threatening' situations and # 'Life Endangering' situations has been LESS THAN DESIRABLE. I know I of a situation where a young person was drunk, fell off a bicycle, hit on his HEAD, and was totally incoherent. The Police were called and responded in about thirty (30) minutes. Not only wouldn't they assist us with the young man and call the Paranedics, they refused to take the young man into custody to allow him to receive medical atten-lion. The young man was not related to anyone of us, and we could aot reach his Mother. Ile were panicked. ,-r OCTOBER 24,1985 PAGE 03 HUNTINGTON CONTINENTAL TO'VU11OUSE ASSOCIATION #,F1 ISSUES FOR (cont'd) B. The frequency of Police Patrol needs to be increased considerably. I have stood for as much as three (3) hours, at night, and never say a Police Car patrol. In order for us to assist in any control of the many vandelism and/or theft incidents, we need POLICE PATROLS at a more frequent interval . C. When we have made requests to the Department for a Police Officer to place a house under surveilance as a possible problem area, due to Drug Traffic or Alcohol usage, we have all but met with deaf ears on the matter. vie are all aware that there are a number of houses in the Continentals j which traffic in Drugs, or have less than acceptable conduct going on in them. VIE NEED YOUR HELP to curtail these types of activities. D. We need more frequent patrols by the PARKING EiIFORCE:,:EIIT OFFICERS to aid us in curtailing the violations of the City Parking Ordinances which affect us all . We need these Patrols between the hours of 11 :00PM and 5:00AM, as this time frame has the highest incidents of violations. 6. The LOCATIONS for the SAFETY DEVICES addressed above are listed below, and are shown on the attached map. The "NUMBER" on the PAP represents the Paragraph describing the requirement. STOP SIGNS- TOTAL REQUIRED- 9 CONTINENTAL at KINGSWOOD DRIVE, SOUTHEAST COMER Control NORTHBOU+ID TRAFFIC to CONTINENTAL DRIVE CONTINENTAL at KINGSWOOD DRIVE, NORTHWEST COMER Control SOUTHBOUIND TRAFFIC to CONTINENTAL DRIVE CONTINENTAL at CAMBRIDGE DRI 7E, SOUTHEAST CORNER Control N ORTHBOU3D TRAFFIC to CONTINENTAL DRIVE `I CONTINENTAL at CAI•1BRIDGE DRIVE, NORTHWEST CORNER Control SOUTNBOUND TRAFFIC to CONTINENTAL DRIVE CONTIIENTAL DRIVE at COMITRY LANE, AORTHEAST CORNER Control WESTBOUND TRAFFIC to CONTINENTAL DRIVE ABERDEEN DRIVE at COVENTRY LANE, SOUTHWEST CORNER Control EASTBOUND TRAFFIC at COVEIITRY LANE KESWICK DRIVE at ABERDEEP DRIVE. NORTHWEST CORNER Control SOUTIIBOU!,ID TRAFFIC at ABERDEEU DRIVE KESWICK DRIVE at CORNWALL DRIVE, NORTHWEST CORNER Control SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC at CORIIWALL DRIVE T ,+ �, It t �1�1, a ! • 5r,,1 1\ � �. r 5 . { � •'. 5( r � r r � 4 1 �'# � F e fr �.. P P t! q.. rn �,_ s.:.r. ._, � •i_ t� r'� �� 'h' r r A '.y�� 1� Yy K,: # a +',S I '�1�t #* i7 `Sny ' + � ^� � ( r .. r5 Y' lr�•,r�l. t�,l.� M r t♦+l• #, � r v .may {: .t lt��,� 1''.s`� 7 '+ � � ,k;a • }, ,.r :�tc Y, 1 4•e I +,• •'�, , 7,f�} � a�r : id,�� A f �r �� f 'D ,, ! � . -' � ^.;>.: "'' w �4 .� x. [• �.,S til,'i+�',��i,,Y '. '�� Y•i,J+�t•11 i�i. r#5.7y',7try,�.�yyL�Sr S5���S l,�li .Jft.r�<h tt51+ •!5. y .ai ,(�aJ l�1rl� 5 :.y' *;, f:T" , 1; r :r � �, + 1.R 5 .F�'l"' 1Y ��}L 514 �;_� ti) YI•M 7 +Yat 4i,+1 1 t J. "�i1 , 1 ,;.: , 1 t i � r � 1 ," 1!'t� r. 1`,� 1• , ,4•t,�y 5'y,.�a„�, �, t Y,, ,1.1';,'�', 5 e;. ,l s ,e ��"P�4� ..4,YS' j re�r'r�`! � 1`S�fF ti.,1.1f.y� �5�: ; .�.S:�r � � ��y i tt.a�. I '� {sit f Y 5�•! S1'�'}?� t.�t, Y• e ,�t,�}. ..:I'�'��1{?t�r;}���'S, Y:i�l. �. }r f.J:n�T�r .�1 4 ." rt• l •, t,1.i ';�� + '"i '.Y+ F i•'�'4r, ;ti ,..,.� 4� �y'.:; pp ,r�rsr ,Y;,1a,:�.y r � {y �'r� '��rti: i�3E'tfek r! i�iY,t"r.�Y ��i��ir, +• �,. / ,.5,.,� ,�;. '�;,, ��. ,�� r r�,I•r1 �»;y:,sl � �'{,., 1,1n,,` .4 fir, .•li�rl,�i• 'il: ;..2 .t ��ti^� +2��.5�¢7' jr�},� .�'�'cn .,5�A,/� � ��,h;.} i '�..t�+r,J�t'�'lr�!►lk, '-11.t.i•�5 ' r,} . ��h :1 ;�,}: ',i it' r• �Z. .�y�,11r i.,.�{�' s� i �y� `{�: .I#f. .'�11'i 1y,:��GI,�'fp�'ta��h.,1 1,71Y. �rs. 3t'�1'.1'Y i,Y.+�. �•+� F '.!"1S''f':r.}•1�'•�ll.11r� �. .��7 r C,. ,.!' ! �,� i,5k�, ,1_`i j �: ,P1Pr6�, 11 {., 1 ` Yta'. �a;.,I,�f•Y} 't ':1t. 5, 7` aM.14" �h*l� \ S 1 .� d+Y �`.'? s # jsr�, 4 y2a .5 r,. ..t.c .n n�a.� .r .r..U+„ r..�_,,.,,. r. .,. , , `r`,.5,:'J(,5 r�A, :.. },� 4ppl.r ,,�� f r r, ^a• _1 .4. n. 5 it al 'YYt{ h '1� ��y' Y::•��'•11,51F; pa �I'.��Y " �T .+i {•,� t,4�,��r��{I�Ss�� r$s.�.�1 OCTOBER 24,1985 PAGE I I.'I CO3TINENTAL TOWNHOI!SEASSOCIATION ISSUES 1 . r 6. 1 . • COVE11TRY LANE at COPMALL DRIVE, / Control 1 tl 1 TPAFFIC at COMWALLDRIVE CROSSWALK1 1 1 DRIVE AT THE CROSSWALK . BOTH 14ESTOOVID AUD EASTBOWND VISIBLE. PARKING SPACE MARKINGa 1 ALLStreets whereOrdinance • parking. r I+. �5 r TT E1 t!GI1VI30SSV 3Sli01ItI1'O lVIN3011103 NOS UM11 'dVFI S133UVd = w•r. HOUV301 IMS rMWISS081, 03SOd(Wd o �r„1; r• ICE au SUOUV303 113IS udOiSrf 03SOdOdd xall �w _ i Ifill;' NOTIV30l 31WISSOa3 0390dONd lid ! . tr- rtrrr' fans ' T?+fr- •�•• trj' lift s N• `^ylLL"�Ci'.'f�Fisl''.� .0� •.•'.' i I .r••r 1 '•,. ii t�-' '� S:LI t :t�.Z_1T�:��• • Ir..• y.r• a 7 r•.r 'MM•' •_ •_ •• r _ . Y.'N' HM• II � asr r ••11. _L Jia N atoN• •r I • w.. 'fi 1 • •yr, 1. ( w i`'ll {•_' rfi:• O q ( 2tc �• , I./N• w. _ /lI FiU.-it- •i ' H .2L MJ- LLry 4711 ffff + rLli. f! •.•a. r•j.% �N• ii F Irr, •11• tiff f _ •i•. iiY: flu• ~ � • i I••a. "i' . I r ✓i .ir .r3. la M••• •r(• Nw. f4•• ./• .Y I.••.. N. .L•.� Ln 1• N•.I tl ••••• • r f � jarth ._Jf1 i•L -_ift ' " I -r ,� Ems. s t4: x O = — ------- - -- r Tr (, Ln !�- '1 \// � .•••• i�si�1JssJFi .u., 'Ina, •' '4Lf sirs: '... ^i1 t li i• •CO All ..�, l Iiiii I lb. Q'v If7 Ju V w/{•�.� 'i•.a1 . . � _ R"i•�ii. r•iS. . "� i..1 fil J •Kir/ t7 .'— V= .•a,• 1t If1/• � •' AIl L I•N. wli•�j • ••! �ss •;} MCI I�I} N 4 O i•` i ± ar fJ .. :ia.. .�r:� •fit.! �7 • Q-�� s2i 7 i7. }S N•al Nrw y .« 7..t: r Tin? 1 W�Z V? 00 t.ff, r.... �. •!. i w )•ib a.1i4� � ZS4• ' L •M.• f•.M •)1•• cn —In- A 0-ZAll II � f OCTOBER 24,1985 PAGE # G ISSUES FOR PARENTS IN ACTION USING TOUGHLOVE & YOUTH IN CRISIS BRIEF DESCRIPTION, PARENTS IM ACTION USING TOUGHLOVE This is, as stated earlier, a PARENT SUPPORT GROUP, which provides service to Parents who are in 'crisis' situations with their Young Persons. '.le are a non- chartered member of the TOUGHLOVE ASSOCIATION, founded in 1980 by pNYLLIS and DAVID YORK in DOYLESTO'WN, PENNSYLVANIA. Our sole purpose is to aid the parents in -ecognizing and dealing with these crisis situations through Brainstorming and through input from other Parents whu have been in simular situations and have successfully found a way out. BRIEF DESCRIPTIONI, YOUTH IN CRISIS This Group is for the Young People who, through whatever means , have found themselves in CRISIS with their PARENTS. We have established requirements which these young persons must live up to, in order to avoid conflicts with their Parents. The YOUTH IN CRISIS GROUP was founded by myself and uy Ilife, Kay, to give the young people a chance to confront their problems, and do so in an H03EST and OPC;I manner, with their peers and the Group Leaders. In this way, their problem areas can be recognized and assistance with coping with them and correcting them is a ( faster process. I None of the people associated with the operation of either Group, from the Co-ordinators to the Group Leaders, are professionals. We are all volunteers who have a desire to help those in situations they can't handle. We have no dues or I mandatory attendance requirements of any kind. All our funding is fron VOLUNTEER OONATIONS by those in the Groups. Our success rate is nothing short of EXCITING and PHENCIMENAL. We have about sixty (GO) Parents and thirty (30) Young Persons registered with our Groups. We have been successful in reuniting about twelve (12) run-sways with their families, have been responsible for taking about twenty-five (25) Adults and Young Persons out of the DRUG ABUSE rolls and ALCOHOL ABUSE rolls. We have aided other groups in establishing a YOUTH GROUP in conjunction with their TOUGHLOVE GROUPS, visited many Parents and Young Persons in their homes at all hours a' the day or night to help put down crisis situations, and have aided in getting six (Gl Young Persons into a REHABILITATION FACILITY for the help they needed to 'kick' the &RjG and/or ALCOHOL problem they were having. Our referrals come from SCHOOLS, POLICE DEPARTMENTS, CHURCIIES, COUNCILIJIG GROUPS, and from our PARLRTS and YOLrRG PERSONS bringing their friends to Group with them. We started our Groups on MARCH 14, 1985 in the HUiITINGTON CONTINERTAL TMIIIHOUSE ASSOCIATION #1 Clubhouse. We outgrew this facility quickly, and arere offered the CAR!•�II YUPPA CONFERENCE CENTER by the PACIFICA HOSPITAL STAFF, both facilities FREE OF CHARGE. We are currently outgrowing the Conference Center. This is where the City Council can help us. i i I OCTOBER 24,1985 PAGE # 7 PARENTS IN ACTIO,'I USING TOUG(ILOVE & YOUTH IoN CRISIS ISSUES FOR I feel that the following statement is a fair and reasonably accurate one: "THE COST OF ANSWERING A CALL, ARRESTING A YOUTH, PROCESSING THIS YOUTH INTO A DETENTION FACILITY, AND KEEPING THIS YOUTH IN CUSTODY FOR ONE (1) .1EEK fS ABOUT ONE-THUUSAND DOLLARS ($1 ,000.00) COST TO THE TAXPAYERS." If it ;s not accurate, please forgive we, as I didn't have time to research the actual cost. However, I will assure you that the figures are not far off. ii Our Group alone has kept THIRTY (30) Young People from falling into the type situations which could have easily lead them to the JUVENILE HALL and JUVENILE COURTS. This figures to be about $30,000.00 cost SAVED the Taxpayers by OUR GROUP it ALONE, and ALL SI;ICE MARCH 1985. II We are desperately in need of ,i facility which can allow for accomodation of our ADULTS and YOUNG PERSONS. Oc:• usage requirements, for this Facility, could be ONE NIGHT PER WEEK between the hours of 7:00PI.1 and ll:OOPI1. I I have noticed that there are a number of School Buildings sta,iding empty in the City, which may have a BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUB using then. II(Arcier, as is 1"he case with WARDLO14 SCHOOL, they are only occupying a small part of the School. by feeling is that due to the work we are doing with the Commulity, but more importantly, FOR the Community. this would be a small investment for the City to make to help so many Parents and Young People in such despirate need. It is good to remember that NOT ALL DRUG USERS or ALCOHOL USERS require the services of places like SANTA ANA PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC, U.C. IRVIIIE HOSPITAL, or the BREA NEUROPHYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, although there are those who do. ►•ost of the people � using Drugs and/or Alcohol can be helped by the people who got them on it to begin with, THEIR PEERS, and these are the one's we want to and are helping. Statistics show that ONE MILLION (1 ,000,000) Young Persons A DAY use DRUGS in + I this Country, and TWO IIILLIM A DAY use ALCOHOL and/or DRUGS. This is staggering to �1 anyone, and a statistic which will climb if something isn't done NOW. Our Youth Group has committed itself to eliminating this problem from EVERY SCHOOL III ORANGE COMM They are forming a LEADERSHIP GROUP for the Schools called "STUPID" , which means- Stand Tounh Under ' Pressure, I ' Do I think this is a commendable thing for OUR YOUTH to undertake, and they deserve the support and encouragement of ALL the resident's of the COUNTY. I am certainly with them ALL THE UAY, and I hope you will be, also, by granting then,, this request. Fs• `0 REQUEco FAR CITY CQU6VCI!``A TIO atk A , /v Date Marcy 22, 1985 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Countil GITX COUNCIL pxov�n BY Submittwi by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administra Y 1 Iy S Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public I9orY.s C�•�_- CITY Gh.�:h Subject: Traffic Safety on PCH in the Vicinity of MarilMf Dr. & Phillips Dr. Consistent with Council Policy? (A Yes [ ] Now Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: There is a need to improve traffic safety on Pacific Coast Highway in the vicinity of i`iariner Drive and Phillips Drive. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution urging Caltrans to construct traffic signals on Pacific Coast Highway at Mariner Drive and at Phillips Drive. ANALYSIS: There have been several fatal accidents in the last two years on Pacific oast Highway between Seal Beach Blvd. and Anderson St. in the Surfside area. In addition, the construction of a new office building will increase traffic volume on Mariner Drive entering onto Pacific Coast Highway, thus, intensifying the problem. FUNDING :SOURCE This s ac on requires no outlay of City funds. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: No not adopt the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution I CIT:PEC:ay Pro�d w • cr7 ' HUNTlNGiON Jla ,-: �♦ 16101 Manner alive•nuntmgton nacn,cak!'mia 92649 N 1 4 d March 11, 1985 S• � V -t eolm The Mayor of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 G��'!�'�O ;cc�Cy Dear Gentlemen, the tragic accident on the Pa ific Coast Highway on Sunday, March 3, could have peen prevented if adequate changes had been made in traffic control for that section of highway. We specifically refer to the need for a traffic signal to protect access from the side streets of Phillips Street and Mariner i'rive. The median barrier being installed by Caltrans is not enough. it will not reduce the speed of traffic on the PCH and it will force congestion and dangerous counterflaw at Mariner Drive, just south of where it will terminate. Tt is only a matter of time before circumstances will cause another tragedy like that of March 3 to occur at Mariner Drive. We urge your immediate action to increase the safety of this death-marked stretch of highway. Action now will establish leadership: action later may be too late. Your very truly, The }luntington Marina Association Board of Directors R. C. Gallyon, President � �_J�'�``�'�' Dan Eby, Vice President all 19ZL Paul Smith, Vice President I Dorothy Lord, Secretary Shirley Davis, Treasurer - ��!�GLGLCi..,� ,}_-xcccc..,• i! r PROPOSAL FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL On Pacific Coast Highway At Phillips Street and Mariner Drive The Huntington Marina Association is requesting the installation of a traffic signal on the Pacific Coast Highway wherm it is entered by Mariner Drive on the south and Phillips Street on the north. "-1..e Mariner Drive entrance is under the jurisdiction of Huntington Beach. The Phillips Street entrance is under the jurisdiction of Seal Beach. In addition to the property owners comprising the Huntington !saris:: association, property owners from Surfside, and various businesses on the Pacific Coast Highway will be favorably impacted b, this installation. It is understood that Caltrans uses warrants for the installation of traffic signals based on those stated in the nationally recognized Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This request is based upon warrant number two, viz. : I ' The interruption of continuous traffic warrant applies to operating conditions where the traff'.c volume on a major street is so heavy that i traffic on a minor intersecting street suffers excessive delay or hazard in ente-ing or crossing the major street. I A number of serious accidents and concern for both hazard and delay lead to a study by Seal Beach in 1983 of the advisability of a signal being installed at Phillips Street on the Pacific Coast Highway. The study conclude:. that traffic volume and accident rates did not justify a signal at that time. Since then (1) the traffic volume hag increased. (2) further increase in volume i+i expected with the occupancy of a new commercial building approximately 600 feet south of Phillips Street, and (3) the installation of a meridian barrier on the Pacific Coast Highway south from Seal Beach Boulevard to approximately 600 feet south of Phillips Street, will increase congestion and hazard at the intersection of Mariner Drive and the Pacific Coast Highway. COMMENT: i 1. When northbound traffic on PCH is heavy, usually weekdays from about 6 AM to 9 AM - the traffic signal at Anderson Street, the first intersection, approximately 1500 feet south of Mariner Drive, provides little or no gap in the PCH traffic flow because of the traffic flowing onto PCH from both of the Anderson entrances. A portion of PCH traffic diverts to streets parallel to PCH and then rejoins the flow at Andersen in an effort to move more expeditiousli ttirdugh the Anderson intersection. As a result, traffic from Mariner Drive, attempting to enter PCH in either direction, may wait for many changes of the Anderson Street signal before finding it safe to turn onto PCH. 2. Traffic going south on PCH at any hour is almost always traveling in excess of the 40 vXH speed limit, which makes left turns from Mariner Drive hazardous. It is expected that the installation of the meridian barrier on PCH will encourage higher rates of speed because of the freeway-like environment it will create. This will make left turns from Mariner Drive even more hazardous. 1 3. The meridian divider will prohibit left turns from Phillivi Street i north onto PCH. Northbound traffic from Surfside may first go south on Surfside Avenue to Anderson Street, then turn left with the green signal at Anderson, and go north onto PCH, thereby adding to the the northbound traffic load on ?CH. 4. Southbound traffic desiring to enter the new commercial building north of Mariner Drive and Surfside traffic desiring to go north but not wishing to detour through Surfside Avenue and Anderson Street, will have to enter the high-speed, southbound lane of PCH and then pull into the protected left turn island opposite Mariner Drive. This will completely prohibit Mariner Drive traffic from turning, left to the center inland on PCH and then merging with southbound PCH traffic. It may also present 'an extreme hazard to southbound traffic in the high speed lane of PC1I both because of cars cutting into that lane and the possibility that the left turn island may overload and cause cars attempting to enter it to protrude into the high-speed lane. i S. Prior to the construction of the new commercial building, right turns from Mariner drive onto the PCH were eased by the availability of a shoulder that permitted entering PCH and then increasing speed to merge with the northbound traffic. This shoulder no longer exists and furthermore, when the building is occupied, drivers of right-turning cars from Mariner Drive will have to be alert to both the northbound traffic on PCH and to traffic emerging from two exits from the building, onto the highway. One of these exits is from an underground parking area and will be partially obscured from the view of Lhe right-turning drivers. to the interests of safety and improved traffic flow during peak hours, it is urged that action be taken to install a traffic signal as described as soon as possible. The Board of Directors ` Huntington "farina Association January 14, 1985 i • r - �► - HU nNom 16101 mmner Curt•turtmgtor.Ce10.Lth101M SMS 1 March 11, 1985 The Honorable George Deukmejian The Governor of California Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear governor Deuk-iejians For many years, a mile-long, curving stretch of Pacific Coast Highway between Seal Beach Boulevard (in Seal Beach) and Phillips Street (in Surfside), his accumulated considerably more than its share of serious automobile accidents. Last year, after a harrowing head-on collision c►laimed the lives of three people, citizens of the area appealed to your office to give high priority to making this highway less hazardous. We understand that as a result Caltrans expedited scheduled improvexents and contracted for the j installation of a median barrier to separate forth- and soutl.-bound traffic lanes. Construction is planned to start this month. On Sunday, lurch 3, three more were killed, one an unborn child, when a car emerging from Phillips Street attempted to make a left turn onto the Pacific Coast Highway and was struck broadside by a car traveling nouch on ?CH. Earlier this year, the owners of Huntington Marina, a condominium of 92 units, and Mariners Point, an office complex under construction on the property adjacent: to Huntington Marina, petitioned Caltrans to install a traffic signal on PCH. Both properties are located on PCH across the highway froco Surfside. The petition was fo.- a split signal, the northern signal to be at Phillips Street, and the southern at Marinir Drive, which is the entrance to Huntingtoa Marina. it was felt that a signal would slow the speed of traffic on PCH and permit access from the side streets during times when heavy traffic flow•,on PCH makes access nearly impo•isible. A •:opy of this petition is enclosed. Caltrans representatives attended a community meeting to discuss this petition. They had made traffic counts during the preceding week Which enabled them to present data on traffic volume, side street delay times, and the accident records in the vicinity for the past several years. Based on these data and using nationally established criteria for signal need, Caltrans demurred on the installation of a signal as petitioned. Since the tragic accident of March 3, telephone conversations with Caltrana indicate their attitude is that the planned median barrier Mould have prevented a left turn from Phillips and, therefore, would have prevented the accident. : The Honorable Georp'—*�)eukmejian March 11, 1985 Page 2 j i We contend that the barrier is not a total solution. We believe that the j barrier will simply move the danger point farther south to Mariner i Drive. We believe early action should be taken on the installation of the proposed signal before we have the same .rind of tragedy on PCH at Mariner Drive as occurred March 3 at Phillips Street. ! in the discussf.ons that lead to the plan fat- the median barrier, to our ; knowledge there was no participation by the City of Huntington Beach and no discussion with the property owners of either Mariners Point or Huntington Marina. Had there been, we believe the need for a traffic signal would have been recognized and incorporated with the barrier in an overall plan for reducing the hazards on the Pacific Coast Highway. I We believe your office deserves much credit for upgrading Caltrans' priority and expediting the barrier plan. We respectfv Uy request your help again in establishing priority for adding a traffic signal to chat plan to provide safety as well as access for our residents. Very truly yours, The Huntington Marina Association Board of Directors R. C. Gallyen, President Don Eby, Vice President_ Paul Smith, Vice President Dorothy Lord, Secretary i Shirley Davis, Treasurer I r i t - _ - -- _ - L-'{.+ -. :k r. Pj�fi�.��'�' 1:��:��� 1T�.IN,'�KZ' .� •l f+'. ., i1. _�• a" �'�y: .. I:. -I ,.. i �.'t JC:'A,%i � ., i[�•. .—� tt f�3 78 ER hE U4 SEC 24 as; R12►r 5!fkakA ,00 sr u. q } • ` ,��. '�, �,` i' ri, G��y Per oK. PACIFIC OCEAN -- 4 REQUE FOR CITY COUNr,,L ACTION 12/$//Ps c°aAdfl„w d p4oir -or. &va- "41i ,f e-,,,,v 6e_ C0t*0 ,hgteW W d'A RV0V AIA1w S A 4-CA ;Wct;+ccLrr,te January 30, 1985 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council �'k�rl� �l�ItiAic ,t,p Submitted by., Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Worts �C Subject: Traffic Signal & Street Work on Pacific Coast Hwy. Between Plain St. & 7th St. CC--678 Consistent with Council Policy? (x] Yes ( ) NEvv Policy or Exceptirn Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachmsnts: STATlrMU OF ISSUE: Traffic signal on P.C.H. and 5th Street needs to be removed and i:a3talled at P.C.H. and 6th Street. Traffic signal at P.C.H. and Main Street r.,eeds to be modified. Traffic median on P.C.H. between Main Street and 7th Street mAs to be tnxlified. Uziveway leading to beacli parking lot at P.C.H. and 5th Street: needs to be abandoned and in- stalled at P.C.H. and 6th Street. FOCCIMENt]ATIM: Appmve the plans and specifications for the subject project and authorize the Director of Public Works to advertise for construction bids upon receipt of final approval from Caltrans. ANALYSIS.- Pttrsuant to a request from the Downtown Merchant's Guild at your April 16, 1984 meeting, the Council authorized the preparation of plans to modify the traffic signals and median islands on P.C.N. at Plain St., 5rh Street and 6th Street. The 5th Street and 6th Street y mrdifications are consistent with the circUation plan for downtown. The Main Street modificdtions may have to be revised in the future depending on development proposals adjacent to the street. A traff-J:- signal will be installed at P.C.H. and 6th Street; the cxEsting signal at P.C.H. an] 5th Street ;,rill be removed; and the existing signal at P.C.H. and Main Street: will be modified to allow left turns onto Main Street. The raised ,uxlian island on P.C.H. will be reconstructel to provide an opening at 6th Street, close the opening at 5th Street and provide F. left turn pocket at Plain Street. The entry to the State Beach parking lot at 5th Street: will be removed aril a now entry con•- struct_ed at 6th Street. Main Street will be restriped and signed to reverse age way traffic northbound off of P.C.11. The restriping will be accomplished by City forces and will result in the loss of 18 parking spaces. The project wa:3 granted a Categorical Exetption under State E.I.R. guidelines. A Coastal Permit is r,;t required. The cost of tt1e project is estimated at $156,000; however, the Main Street: m.dificat.ions are only about $15,000 or the total cost. FC NDM SOURCE: H.C.D. Jobs Bill funds. The $156,000 is budgeted in Ac=ant No. 894837, AYlIMIATIVE AFL'! ON: + Deny or postpone the approval of the project. ATmACIIW.r: Iv_- on Map P,04",r:Pw:us:jy i r .__., -M rNo {� i 1 OC-678 --- Reloratian of traffic signals & driveway. R =stzuction of raisad iredian. Fi�w=sc traffic flow on Main Street. A I a REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date November 26, 1964 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Cbunci1 'r E GO Gt1a Submitted by: Charles W. Epson, City Adminis for�� Y ID .rI 19--- Prep3red by: Paul E. 0ock, Director Public Works Subjoct: CITY ,�N'i`. SI(�I�5 •(�r Y '�" �'�'`• .�, Statement of issuo, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: sTp, r of ISSUE: � A design and cost for City entry signs is presented to Council for approval. RRCIJiVL�101 Approve Design 'A' for City entry signs. ANALYSIS: 'Ilse City Council has directed that City entry signs be placed at various locations. Based on the theme of the contest model, two designs have been proposed. The most visable and available locations are within the existing raised landscaped median islands. The first tun locations for installation are on Pa=khurst Street, south of Garfield Avenue, west of Magnolia Street and on Warner Avenue west of Magnolia Street. Considering visibility, dolor and sight distance obstruction, tao modified designs am being presented. Design 'A' is being recomn-anded as it provides a lamer profile and is more subtle in the presentation. Cost for each installation will be $2,700.00±- FUNDING: Funds budgeted in Account #415659, "Improvements, Other", $13,800.00. ALTERNATIVE AMONS: 1. Approve Design 'B' 2. Request additional designs. ATTTACHA!FN1S: Designs Location Map PC-IM:ik P10 4/81 IJ v 'l Itlit , (� i pe 0b PI. ► t i ii i . .. .. ...._.... .... . . .. .. .., ..ra;za•, . . ,:xt:r:..:,Tar* NTS MiENW CIT. nArw un CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL STREETS AND HIGHWAYS r,DOPTED BY arY CQVCL i FE9X UT10N W 4369-DEC 12.1976 LEGEND: i ----- FREEWAY SWEET CAPWn' � MAJOR 45= I PRIMARY `um `_..... - - SECONDARY 20m I - _-_. NOTE: ...,..a... ' ... ••t Seth t M/ts port [%is?" WAY CI IR.AT ` - - - - — MDT VUSSAty ULTWiTt 11,04?d r!T CAtMO L,hts P#XATt ACAS MNtttt 1l [MISTS Fo CITY OF r HUNTINGTON BEACH ''�'• r y--- ORANGE COUNTY CAUFORNIA t , 1 I (; -S400� REQUES, FOR CITY CQUNCINCTI0 Date November 7, 1984 Sabmitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: C. W. Thompson, City Administrator v`^' GVUNCit' 0 VD'D Gl'tY � Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Work Subject: Increase in C.E.C. Grant Funds CIT CL Statement of issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Attemative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: V ' douncil approve is required in order to accept additional funds from the California Energy Commission for the improvement of traffic signal timing. RECOM►+SENDATION: Accept: an adntionel $1,200.00 in grant funds and authorize the Chief of Administrative Services to increase the expenditure allocation for that purpose by that amount. ANALYSIS: On June 4, 1984, the City Council approved Resolution No. 5384 accepting a California Energy Commission grant in the amount of $28,600.00 for the improvement of traffic signal timing within the City. Subsequently it was learned that an additional $1,200.00 was available to the City for this purpose which would increase the total grant to $29,200.00. These additional Funds would make an improvement in the project possible and should be accepted. FUNDING SOURCE: Ca Porn a Energy Commiac;on grant funds of $1,200.00 to be deposited in account R301 and expended in account 906659. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reject the .funds. ATTACHMENTS: F.I.S. i I CWT:PEC:JS:jy I .00 i• PIO 4/a1 i CITY OIL FIUNTINGTON BEACH 10�-fl INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION "UNTINSTOh 5EAW To CHAMM W. THOMPSON From DMW J. nWZ, Chief City Administrator Administrative Services Subject RDQUEST FOR A1WI'T GNAL FUNDING Date NOVFIBER 9, 1984 TO ACOW k-VATE C.E.C. GRANT' F.I.S. #85-16 I As rapired under the autborily of Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Lrpact Statement has beet; prepared and submitted relative to the cityyIs successful application to the California Energy Cc=rission for purposes of implementing measurer intended to promote a reduction of fuel consumption through modification to the City's signal timing system. Grant funds in the amount of $28,600 have previously been approved. This particular request is for an additional $1,200 in grant funds presently available to the City. The only mamedi.ate fiscal irrpact of this transaction will be to limit the city•s earning capability during the interim - prior tc reimtxwsemcnt of these fund from the operational sou►.�ce. r Z, C f Administrative Services Department R,?F:AR:skd FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT C.E.C. ENERGY GRANT 1. Budget Status The project is included in the current budget, but the amount allocated is less than the State is willing to provide. This occurred because City staff underestimated the funding that . would be available from the agency for this purpose. 2. Total Costs: A. Direct: $1,200.00 with no additional charges attendant to this expenditure for the year. B. Indirect: Loss of earning capacity on these funds. 3. Funding Source: I A. Funds: Grant Funds (account #R301) $1,200.00 B. Revenue Source: California Energy Commission C. Alternative Funding Sources: General Funds, Gas Tax. D. History: Gas tax has been used for this purpose in the past. This is our first grant of this type. I -- REQUES . F©R CITY COUNCIL , CTION Date October 3, 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council aTL. �� ,rPROYE�BY GIrY OL1N Submitted by: C. W. Thompson, City Administrator ' C L ry Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Workb '" � � 1 J gubjat: Cal Trans Signal Maintenance Funds Statement of luue, Racommendation,Analysis, Funding Souroe,Altemative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: city Council approval is required to modify the 1984-85 budget in order to pay fees due the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) . RECO2*1ENDATION: Author i ze t e appropriation of $50,000 from the Unencumbered General Fund Balance to pay Caltrans for signal maintenance on State Highways this fiscal year. ANALYSIS: I.WKeen the fiscal year ended on June 30, 1984, the City had not processed billings for signal maintenance from Caltrans. However, the funds allocated for payment of the 1983-84 charges were not carried forward into the current year. 2. When the 1983-84 bills %ere paid in August, they were paid out of ' the current 1984-85 allocation. As a result, we are now short funds to pay the 1984-85 bills which are beginning to arrive. 3. The 1983-84 charges totaled nearly $50,000.00. This amount should be restored to the current budget to enable us to meet these obligations in a timely manner. SOURCE OF FUNDS: '! Unappropriatea eneral Fund Balance (Account A301) for $50,000.00. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Hold t e -85 bills until the 1985-86 budget year. 2. Do not appropriate $50,000, but submit bills to Council on a quarterly basis. ATTACHMENT: F.I.5. i CWT:PEC:JS:jy i No 4/81 r 4 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH eRkir INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION KNTL4GTOH xt�m To CHARLES W. THOMPSON From ROBERT J. FRANZ, Chief City Administrator Administrative Services Subject R.EAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS Date OCTOBER 5, 1984 TO ACCOMMODATE OUTSTANDING 1983/84 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE CHARGES -F.I.S. 85-13 As required under.the authority of Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared and submitted relative to the request of new funding to satisfy 1983/84 claims for Cal Trans signal maintenance charges. Estimates are that an appropriation of $50,000 would be adequate fcr this purpose. Should the City Council chose to approve this use of as-of-yet uncommitted funds rather than ,requiring the particular entity to absorb these charges within their respective departmental operating budget, the unaudited, unencumbered balance of the unappropriated General Fund will be reduced to $3,407,613. i 1 BERT J. ZL Chief Administrative Services Departm it RJF:skd i 'I 0783J r1 FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT CALTPW-1S MAMTENANCE I i 1. Budget Status The activity is included in the current budget, but allocated funds are inadequate to pay two years bills. This occurred because the 1983-84 billings were not encumbered prior to June 30, 1984. 1. Total Costs ' A. Direct: $50,000. 00 with no additional charges attendant ,t to this Expenditure for the year. T B. Indirect: Loss of earning capacity on these funds. 3. Fundinq Source A. Funds: General Funds (account #A301) $50,000.0. B. Revenue Sources: General Taxation C. Alternative Funding Sources: None D. History: General funds have always been use%a for this purpose is: the past. •11f t, `1 J.S CITE!' OF �0UNTG80 GTOfNI SUACO /p/ � INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Paul Cook, Director of Public Works From Alicia M. 'Wentworth, City Clerk PF Subject Request for Traffic Signal Date October 4, 1904 Springdale/Croupier Mrs. Janet Ewell, PTA President, Franklin School has requested that her j attached communication requesting a traffic light at Springdale h Croupier ihe placed on the 10-15-84 Council Agenda. I We+ are scheduling lin this item under Public Comments. ! cc: Charles Thompson, City Administrator Earle Robitaille, Police Chief YA 1 I , i I f r TO .41e.140r w F, 1 ` 13 August 1984 Honorable Mayor Jack Kelly, and City Council Members City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647 Subject: Hills Land 6 Water Company Property ti Hamilton h Newland, H.B. Dear Mayor Kelly and City Council Members: 4 A most sincere TURK YOU to each of you for the magnificent f job you have done in having signs posted on subject property. This past weekend we were able to enjoy our patio and pool for the first time in three summers; it was once again a lovely place to be without the dust and dirt blowing into our yard and home. We had a small pool party Saturday and our family enjoyed dinner in the patio Sunday aftgr.00n; r without your efforts in having the signs posted, this would not have been possible. Several of our neighbors voiced their appreciation to us regarding the improvemeut the signs have made; and we all t are giving you credit for seeing that it was accomplished. Again, thank you for being the effective body of our city government that you are; and please know that we are grateful for your efforts. Sincerely, Hr. b Mrs. L. H. Ayers 8502 Sandy Hook Drive Huntington beach, Ca. 92646 1 bcc: Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk • r'1 1441'G hews- oh 'brrlg �- 1i ' WTV OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ~ ee" INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To C. W. Thompson From Paul E. Cook\r---0_ City Administrator Director of Public Works Subject Audible Traffic Signals Date June 14, 1984 for the Handicapped When the City Council considered the allocation of 83-84 SB 821 (Bicycle & Pedestrian) funds last month, they directed that the $15,000 proposed for -audible traffic signals be redirected to other improvements for the handicapped such as wheelchair ramps. The City Council also requested more information regarding the benefits of audible traffic signals. Attached is a report from the Traffic Engineer on this matter. He comes to the conclusion that audible traffic signals are of considerable benefit to the j elderly as well as the visually handicapped. He has also ..,r. attached several letters requesting more audible signals from local citizens and organizations. Based on this data, I recommend that the City Council reallocate the $150000 to audible traffic signals rather than other handi- capped uses. PEC:jy Attach. I � I ji ne (CITY OF 14UPATI1MOTON MACH INTEFI•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ,UNT WG10N!I AC" : From Bruce Gilmer i To Paul Cook Traffic Engineer Director of Public Works June 12, 1904 Zl Funds Date ` Subject Reallocation of FY 83/84 Sb � l The City Council requested $151000.00 previously allocated to audible signals be reallocated to another project for the handicapped. SB 021 funds are a special fund set up by the 3 legislature for use in construction of biand Accetlsstrian rampsfacilities. and iaudible signals are e of atjest must relate to the aforementioned activities. T present the only handicapped related projects. The Mayor's Ad Hoc Committee, chaired by Elaine Craft (specifically farmed to glue Input regarding handicapped access ramps)► studied the audible signals. The findings of the committee are as follows: "The committee has great concern for the needs of all persons In our City and a specific J interest ;n the needs of the visually handicapped. We strongly recommend In warranted r specific locations(Main &Florida which the chairmen and staff personally researched at a citizen's request) be Installed (By Elaine Craft) a be used an The staff is preparing a list oceed withof thirty 0h eccess romadministrative process as dlocations which ireci d by hesCity alternate project and will p Council. The first step is preparation of a City Council resolution reallocating the funds. request for approval will then C ttie d will foOrward t County CaliforniaTransion Association afar approval. if approved by �C7 , Y Governments for further approval. if approved by SCAG, a letter of approvel will be sent to OCTC. OCTC will then approve expenditure of the funds. I+ The City Council requested information on who used the audible signals. The following groups who have previously requested audible signals were contacted: (1) Wycliffe Gardens (2) Huntington Terrace (3) Huntington Beach HIgh School Guidance Center (4) Goldenwest College (5) Doyle McIntosh Center (6) Vivian Carson, Mobility Instructor Each group requested more audible signals be installed in areas of need. The groups that use the signals were identified 05 the visually lsattached.ied and senior citizens (approximately 400 people a day). A copy of each letThe City Council requested distances on the presently Identified locations to thelnlave e residence. The approximate distance to the near est setting for upper and lower volume. They are set for low level Lu just be heard In the local area when no traffic noise is present. The ambient noise level (traffic noise) is measured automatically and adjusts the sound level up and down so the tone may be heard at the signals. The audible signal only operates when a pedestrian is present and the push button is activated. The time the audible on is made (night and early morning hoiurs),3these devices arenal is seven ds. When no pedestrian active client. BHG:BW:jy G<--h-dens "+ran;orC�l b� VJyr I(rf�llt;: i:7tN; Inc tAI .)..1 in,r,i„: ,r,;, t,,. ►nu +. n lir'uth. C'�192;5Af3 i 1�1 Rd7.4fti6 June 7, 1984 Mr. Bruce Gilmer City Traffic Engineer City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,Ca. 9264'8 Dear Mr. Gilmer: The residents of Wycliffe Gardens sincerely appreciate • the pedestrian crossing at Florida and Main Streets. That light certainly has taken the terror out of a trip to Five Points for our drivers as well as our walkers. There is one thing you could do, however, to make a good thing better. Please add a "bird .call" to our Main Street crossing. Of the 220 residents of Wycliffe Gardens four (4) are totally blind, and three (3) are legally blind. These people rely on an audible cue for mobility. in addition, 158 of our residents are over 70 (66 are over 80, 6 are over 90) . Older people benefit immensely from multi- sensory stimulation. So while a visual crossing• cue may be adequate a double (visual and audible) is preferable. This is especially true at the busy Main Street intersection where our people encounter such a confussion of visual imput. The "bird call"would be a great help in alerting our older residents that the "walking man" is lit and is :safe to begin crossing. Thank you for year prompt attention to this matter. We are grateful for your continued sensitivity to the needs of the elderly and disabled citizens of Huntington Beach. Sincerely, fe. a/)e4l.-nne Halverson Administrator JH/db cc: Mr. pill Wadel.l T� S ' r• 18800 Florida Street, #350 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 June 6, 1984 } Mr. Waddell Public Works Department City Hall Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 I Dear Mr. Waddell: This letter concerns the problem that senior citizens are having in crossing Main Street at Florida to get into the 5 Points shopping center. i I, who am legally blind, cannot see the figures on he crossing light because they are too high, too small, and out of my range of vision. Many seniors from larktington Terrace and Wycliffe Gardens (both senior citizen housing units)have the same problem. We would like to shop at 5 Points but are afraid to � ! cross the street at' the above signal. Too, seniors from Wycliffe and Huuntington Terrace can- not cross that intersection safely to catch the #74 bus which stops at 5 Points. If a beeper could be installed at this intersection, the problem would be eliminated. Your kind attention to this request will be greatly appreciated by our senior citizens and by me. Sincerly, r�vl)7v . i Anna Koester i I ` ►''mot UJID— A Anna Poop Conn,,? 1716? _I_'d n n,•,n v r Principal Deon Huntington [)or?�h ,,A 42h17 1714t 8dri 177,1 i October 7, 1983 Bill Waddell Department of Public Works City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Bill : On behalf of the students and staff at the Guidance Center, I would like to express our appreciation to you for taking time to provide pedestrian safety training for our students. We all feel that the experience was a beneficial one which will help to make our students safer when they cross the street. Thank you for your caring and patience. Sincerely, Connie Luizzi Dean i CL/lc f 1 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT /?1 1 �I ► l ' I .-�. . Golden West College A Slevens Prn "1 15744 Golden West Stroot • P o.Box P•1092 • Huntington Beach • Cel,tomie • 92647•0592 • (714)©92.7711 June 7, 1984 I Mr. Bill Waddell Civil Engineering Assistant City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 140 Huntington Bdach, CA 92646 Dear Bill : After our recent conversation regarding visually impaired students ► and senior citizens who may Le using the auditory "bird call" traffic signals, I collected some loose statistics for you. l We currently have 10 low vision or blind students who take classes on our campus. Recently, we have had several people who are totally blind ► inquiring about fall classes. These have been on-campus inquiries which means these individuals have taken the bus and walked onto the campus, thus utilizing the auditory traffic signals. ► Additionally, I called our Community Services office. They estimate between three hundred and five hundred senior citizens come on campus each week to attend workshops, captioned films or other activities designed specifically for them. I did not inquire into the number of senior citizens enrolled .in regular college classes. I have no idea how many of these individuals are depending on the auditory signals to assist them. I wish you success in your efforts to put Ro re of these auditory devices throughout the city of Huntington Beach. I look forward to continuing the cooperative line of communication we have developed. Please feel free to call me, if you require further assistance. Yours truly, Lois Shafqat, Ph.D. , Assistant Dean/Director Disabled Students Program LS/m; One of the Coast Coft"un If COUNVIN servrA COSfa Mesa.rmnlan val4+y,Garden atove,Hr,•ri np!or•neach t.'4"Y UN,VIOWPOn AferA,SO&'Oaactt•nd WO'ITA ster costo of tnnloes Geared NMdgv,f•t1 Chard E t1,^n•*31.—v A rnorrd 0 rmn,r^a 1'41 1. w Ar—vjrA�p a.,,r 9 f —ot F.4. M V%Ow A^nntww..., -------- r f� Maln Of rice �' CarNr Aaaaramant.halnlnp and Employment sa►rina 81ai Gardena.CA 11ou!evard .0 West Chapman Ave Pit? Garden Grove.CA 92E�t4 Orange.CA 92668 (714)898.9571 VOiLe (714)385.1731 Vo-ce (714)892-70701DD (714)395.1704 VD V& #9DINVASLIPI(D Pfnldint Gaspe T.Gentry.Jf. tasaullve Dlractor Stands Prefno Dootd of DIMMON /Oi"OnanCotndtof the Sind 7 June 1984 ". Jor,n p!phere Psd Kull Peanas � ary Vy ;�,era4rallof+o8each Bill Waddell, Public Works Department np City of Hunitngton beach Wh Notoo alFedof'eett',onof the Bind ofc&imma 2000 Main Street Shir"Kleln Huntington Beach, California 92648 1 Akohol,Dn+o AbM and Disabky Don Wcvstion H"-"Swo Dear Mr. Waddell, t10nfU McKone Enclosed please find my report on audio traffic signals, An MO ccolo valchod lot the Dail prepared for the Mayor' s Ad Hoc Committee on Handicapped c1l.o-oe Most Needs. .�w Poscae Most;Company N AlaiefSMv�c. I strongly support a program to install audio traffic . Of.Pope►PLAS04 signals and educate the public on their use in Huntington ' NW4.cWp thatgech pter02 ey Beach. Dr.Wesha+oa+ If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitF Golden Nest Coaepe .• ; Barbara:peat to contact me at 714/ 898-9571. C4hOwnla Association of N!vrdoprady Hardtappeci chociren and Addis sincerely, aa f Ca�brryiA sociaNarrfa ttie"1ee1 f Grep W+nertaotton+ 111/:/V $tale sentior Paul Carpentw's Office J �, Amy Jane Frater aj f/a 1 . , i i Dayte McIntosh Centef Is a non•r►0►ll.taik everno corpotatton i 1 f REc 7RT ON AUDIO TRAFFIC SIGUALS for the CITY OF HUNTINGTON Bi:ACII Prepared by Amy Jane Frater of the DAYLE mcINTOSH CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INTRODUCTION Eighty percent of Americans who are legally blind are able to see to some extent. They may be able to distinguish between light and dark, or able to read large print. For some people, vision may become more limited over a long period of time. Some individuals may not feel. compelled to seek training or rehabilitation, such as mobility training. Audio traffic signals can benefit persons with varying degrees of visual limitations. The signals provide greater safety them. independence to individuals who are properly educated o use Therefore, a program to install audio traffic signals should consider the evwa sftoraining of orient thetpublicple who will use them, to specific intersections. and incorporatte Y NEEDS ASSESSMENT The California Department of Rehabilitation estimate3 that it has 44 visually . nspaired clients from the City of Huntington Beach. 485 City residents were DR clients in the period of July 1- December 31, 1983. Department statistics indicate that 9% of all work-disabled Californians, aged 16-64, have visual limitations. The Department's primary objective is to enable disabled individuals to engage in suitable employment by providing vocational f rehabilitation services. Their clientele is generally between the ages of 16-64. This is the type of disabled client who would msot likely have the opportunity to live independently and be physically mobile in the community. There are matey obstables to estimating the population of visually impaired persons. A significant number of individuals do not identify themselves as disabled, whichand data can be participate gathered.inPart of rehabilitation programs this group is already rehabilitated, and know, for example, how to use mobility aids such as audic traffic signals. The elderly population can be assumed to have a proportionately high degree of visual and other impairments because disabilities have accumulated in this 13roup over time. Other sources of people with limited vision in Huntington Beach are training programs such as the Guidence Center. 774, f page two w ! ` r • I EVALUATION OF AUDIO TRAFFIC SIGNALS Audio traffic toaknow can what the enormously signalshelpful mean, and traffic patterns individualswho are trained patterns ' at particular intersections. Unfortunately, some people who soul bereArit from them do not know how to use them when they encounter one on the• streetu dAcdrre5pondsntoawhich directional Alsononot remember which son all cities install the sianals in the same way. For example . a "Cuckoo" in the City of Los Angeles means the opposite of a "Cuckoo" in Huntingon Audible traffic signals are an aid to visually-disabled persons , but they cannot be relied upon completely. Another important factor in pedestrian moiC is an signalimayvbeuuselessito all npersonning to traffic flow. A Bird- all who has been trained in mobility, but not oriented to an audio signal. Another type of audible traffic signal uses a synthesized voice to give commands such as "Walk now on Mai� Street" .hat it is advantalf- anatory ge of this model over the Bird-Call type s to anyone who understands English and can hear. it can be af+sumed that a pedestrian training know atwhich each intersectionhe/she will travci without elaborate RECOMMENDATION I strongly encourage the City of Huntington Beach to pursue plans s to install additional audio traffic signals and ed,icate the public j on their use• o are trained and able Such stri are invaluable live persons to pendently. ' disatilities wh I recommend the installation of synthesized-voice signals , which are easy to use by visually P ll impaired individuals having varying degrees of mobility skills. With whatever type of audio signals are installed, it is crucial in ral that information aboiat their use and mobility traithegform ofepamphlet: be made available, to the public. This could take uctions at each site. printed in Braille, and Braille instr ntin ton Beach is to be congratulated for its efforts The City of Hu g to improve accessibility to all pedestrians. An accessible Of all citizens. community contributes to the independence and dignity iI I . 1 I I have enccuntered numerous situations throughout orange C6unty where audible signals at intersections could aid visually impaired people, both "legally blind" and 'low vision" , to cross them more safely. I have often seen how fear of a street crossing has kept people from being as independent as they would like to be . Feel free to contact me if I can be of additional service to you. Sincerely , .0 Vivian Carson, M.A. , Orientation and Mobility Specialist Member of California Association of Orientation and Mobility Specialists (CAO14S) i ' I I . Vivian Cal-son 1265 14. Chrisden, #C206 Anaheim, CA. 92807 June 6 , 1984 Hill Waddell P.E. City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Dear Mr. 'Waddell , This letter is to offer support for the audible signals currently in use in the city of Huntington Beach and to endorse their placement at additional essential intersxtions. As an Orientation and Mobility Specialist working with j legally blind adults in Orange County I have experienced firsthand the benefits c . these signals for visually impaired People. Three specific Examples will demonstrate why I find these a•�ditory aids to be beneficial: iI 1) Approximately two years ago I provided independent travel instruction to a legally blind , partially sighted man who lived on rarkside Lane , just south of Edinger. Long before I was able to work with him he was able -o use the auditory signal at the intersection of Parkside and Edinger to get to the Huntington Center, t:.2reby .maintaining, some of his independence. I' 2 ) I spend a large portion of my instruction time at signal-controlled intersections. ttore than once I've , been approached by elderly pedestrians asking me to tell I them when the wa?k light came on because they could not see the signal. 3 ) Through Orientation and Mobility '.instruction , I have taught many legally blind people to cross signal-controlled intersections safely and efficiently by developing an Iunderstanding of the flow of traffic. There have been times, however, when inadequate traffic flow at some intersections has prevented these people from crossing them independently. 0Tf (0 1 N VC I& CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH y.0CLA.,INTER•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION i To C. W. Thompson From Paul E. Cook'\� City Administrator Director of Public Works Subject City Entrance Signs Date Jitne 14, 1984 At their mr_•eting of June 4 , 1984, the City Council allocated the $14,00� proposed for median sculptures to City entrance monuments rstead. They requested further information on the estimated cost of these monuments and the proposed locations where they would be placed. Our cost estimate for the manufacture and installation of a monument similar to that shown on the attLched photocopy is $2,500.00. in February, 1984, the Mayor sent letters to about 15 civic organizations soliciting their interest in participat- ing in the cost of one or more monuments. To date no responses have been received. We would propose installing these monuments in conjunctibn with our program to landscape medians throughout the City. However, Caltrans does not allow these monuments within their right-of- way on peach Blvd. or Pacific Coast highway. Therefore, alter- na'-e location outside their right-of-way will have to be found near the entrance to the City on these two "ighways. On a preliminary basis, I would recommend %..-at monuments be placed according to the following priorities: 1. P.C.H. at Warner Ave., 2. P.C.H. at the Santa Ana River 3. Warner Ave. at P.C.H. 4. Beach Blvd. at the San Diego Freeway 5. Brookhurst St. at Garfield Ave. G, Adams at the Santa Ana River l 7. Warner Ave. at Magnolia St. S. Hamtiton Ave. at the Santa Ana River PEC:7y Attach. I .I i .I i I � �r L�.1 (jam , 1 �. ''a' • � ',• •.-1 .. , .. :`'.M1ti •.rr•�•.f•�•. � �.�-� .:-• ..rF:.a I,'U ..•}.•�. . .._•�.. -t•._.•�,r1.C,..�a",•.! �f.!l.J: :'•S^:•�:•. i i I -777 r IN cad O/�! REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date May 29, 1994 Submitted tot Honorable Mayor and City Council Y CxTY GOU�GtL Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Administrato A "OVSD a tom•+'. Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public tr*o ks • V Subject: California Energy Commission Grant f r Traf ig Coordination Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: Statement of Issue: Funds for providing bprovenent to the traffic signal timing on major streets are available to the City thru the California Energy Camdssion. FaecxY rendation: Adopt Resolution NoS3 authorizing submittal of an application and execution of the necessary docLmmts by the City Administrator. Anal sus: lbe State of California is making available $500,000 for grants and technical support to local governments to reduce fuel consumption through mcxiificat-Lons to the timing of traffic signal systems within Chair jurisdiction. This Fusel Efficient Traffic Signal Management Program is jointly administered by the California Department of Transportation and the California Energy Cmvdssion. Through the Fuel Efficient Traffic Signal Management Program, local governments are assisted in improving traffic signal system timing plans through use of TRANSYT and other computer models. It is estimated that full, statewide imple- mentation of this signal timing program could cortserve 150 million gallons of i fuel and reduce vehicle operating costs. Total savings from the program would be appropriately $550 million annually. local government agencies awarded a grant will be required to have project staff 1 attend specialized technical train ng workshops. The geographic distribution of grant recipients within the state will determine the number and location of the training workshops. The training is designed to enhance the specialized ski3.Ts i of local traffic engineering personnel and traffic consultants who serve local i goL-exranent agencies. Funding for travel and housing will be included in the grant requested. Application wilt cover 24 intersections on Edinger Avenue and on gxmJshurst Street eligible Under this program. Cooperative effort: with the City of Fountain Valley will assure Improvement over the entire length of the Brookhurst project now being cmpleted. Funding Source: Budgeted personnel time will be used to provide contribution requested of Cwty as a participant in the program. j PIO 4re1 �-/9 F ' Regtbest for city Council Action California Enew.y C=dssion Grant for Traffic Signal Coordination May 29, 1984 Page 2 Alternative Actions: 1. Do not approve the resolution. 2. Reduce the scope of the application and adopt the resolution. Attachments: Resolution No. PFC:BEtG:Iw 1 I i i i I i i t '`• ,:;;. =.::. .,�. .,�,. ..�... .. � _ .. .._` . . ,. - -. ..._ . .. .. ,.... ... .. _...-a..+va..row.......-..'8:-�..=rSw"Z►xT... 's tc , n • ReJ"t for City Council Action California Energy Oameission Grant: for Traffic Signal Coordin:t im May 29, 1984 Page 2 Alternntivg Actions: L Dos not aP rcove the revolution. 2. P4duce tha scope of the application and adopt the revolution. ! Att:ac�mente: AeBOlution N1o. PEG:BHG:lw i I (I k� F ,•I i c i• r t. t :ter- ----- CITY OF HIJNTING'1 ON BEACH "•`.' "'� INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ,s �/ � sP nwnar.0 ry� �r n V l't l�'r l d S r; To Paul Cook, Director of Public Works From Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk Subject Informal Petition For Crossing Light Date 3/14/84 Slater/Geraldine 1 Attached is an informal petition listing approxi„tately 138 signatures of residents requesting a crossing light at Slater and Geraldine. which was submitted by a resident She stated that she would address Council on the matter under public comments At the 3/19184 meeting. and I informed her that I would inform staff of her petition. cc: Charles Thompson, City Adminstrator Chief Robitaille P.S. She stated that she has contacted Counciwoman Finley regarding the matter. ooes. Towov 411awA� 674444" eql-c'f3l I � �9 t 7 VQ .is .•., •..: . .. .- .... • -• ,a a. . - -_ .._..�.. 1'v::c.y..j::1:.si{r4wlJi}O.r REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date January 16, 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council !` Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Administrator �ppRoyED itiY t41 Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: Goldenwest and Clay Traffic Signals CAS. Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:(y Statement 0' Issue: The design of the traffic signal and the closure of the east leg of Clay Avenue at Goldenwest Street requires City Council approval. i Recommendation: Approve the closure and barricading of Clay Avenue between Goldenwest Street and Stewart Street and the design of the traffic signal incorporating the closure. Anal ale At Council direction, plans were prepared for Installation of traffic signals at Goldenwest Street at Clay Avenue. During the design phase, several construction problems were . encountered.-Signal operation and safety considerations regarding the offset legs of Clay Avenue prompted Investigation and design of alternative plans. As a result of these events, the Public Works Department began discussions with the Huntington Beach , Company with the purpose of obtaining the necessary right-of-way to widen Goldenwest ,c Street to accommodate the planned signal. The scope of those discussions were widened to include the planning and traffic circulation considerations east of Goldenwest Street. The Southern California Edison Company was also involved dud to the pole line to be , relocated along the west side of Goldenwest Street. Tentative agreement on these matters has been reached. The right-of-way necessary to widen Goldenwest Street and the easement required to relocate the SCE pole line would be offered by the Huntington Beach Company. The City of Huntington Beach would barricade Clay Avenue at Stewart Street and at Goldenwest Street. Dovelopment plans which created acceptable access and circulation east of Goldenwest and north of Clay without using the closed section of Clay would permit consideration of vacating that portion of Clay Avenue by the City. The traffic signal plan which Incorporates these features Is more efficient, less costly, and Is anticipated to experience fewer accidents than the four-legged alternative. Of the signal alt&rnatives, It Is the alternative recommended by the Public Works Department. { The estimated cost of the signal Installation is $72,000. Funding Source: The signal construction will be funded by the Gas Tax Fund (Account No. 745920). i i i Plo 4181 Request for City Council Action I Goldenwest and Clay Traffic Signals I January 16, 1984 Page 2 AlterQuve,Actions: 1. Direct that the cost leg of Clay Avenue be kept open and Included In the signal design and construction. 2. Direct the closure as recommended and eliminate the traffic signal In favor of a northbound acceleration lane for vehicles turning left onto Goldenwest from the west leg of Clay. I Attachments: Letter- Huntington Beach Company PEC:BHG:lw ' 'it cc: CC-592 Corresp. ; wTeA :: ; A;� � "0 J ,f I I i Hunt!hgton Beach Company FC3 2110 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 9264a•2499 (714)9WA351 t R.J.Work Vice PrealCent—General Manager January 6, 1984 Mr. Paul Cook, Director Public Works Department 1, 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Goldenwest Street and Clay Avenue Traffic Si,;nal Dear Paul: b� Thank you for providing us an opportunity to review your plans for construction of the above-referenced traffic signal. As you know, Huntington Beach Company shares your concern about the configuration of this intersection and has previously requested the abandonment of Clay Avenue east of Goldenwest as a step toward Improving traffic conditions In this area. in order to expedite completion of the signalizat'on project in a timely and cost effective manner, we propose the following agreement: 1. Huntington Beach Company shall grant to the City, at no cost, the 4 additional right-of-way required for the widening of Goldenwest Street, as indicated on your drawing dated May 4, 1983. 2. Huntington Beach Company shall grant to Southern California Edison Company an easement to allow for the relocation of power poles located within the area to be widened. o 3. The City of Huntington Beach shall close Clay Avenue east of Goldenwest Street by placing barricades at Clay's Intersections with Goldenwest and Stewart Streets. 4. Upon submittal of a development plan with acceptable alternative access and circulation for the properties east of Goldenwest Street and south of Garfield Avenue, the City shall consider vacating the i. portion of Clay Avenue between Goldenwest and Stewart Streets. lease contact me so that we may If these terms are acceptable to you, p Y begin preparing the necessary documents. I look forward to your reply. Very truly urs, RJW/e i I Garfield Avenue ' PROJECT-SITE _ ? CF_C w`,3LY-.�'I C1R7�• .,.f sYC �7.Is[ )�Y L� _. - !^_ •t � 14 L rL LE .E REVISIOBi REFERENCES i PARILD By, OAT! -i 101 DATE MIT. AVVVID Goldenwest Clav DRAWN Traffic Signal CITY 5F s AiMOYE! VIEPARTME"OF PUBLIC WORKS MrltliTM?<IR OF lgltiC WORKS DATE ' REPORTS: SIGNAL AT CLAY b GOLDENWEST THERE ARE FIVE COMPANIES INVOLVED WITH THIS SIGNAL: EDISON POWER cO'%fPANY, AMINOIL, CHEVRON, HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. , AND THE CITY TRANSPORTATION c COMMIS£ION. 1 THEY ALL AGREE TN.AT A SIGNAL WILL BE PUT UP AT CLAY AND GOLDENWEST. HOWEVEn, IT IS STALLED RIGHT NOW. BECAUSE OF WHO IS GOING TO FINANCE THE PROJECT. BECAUSE THERE ARE MANY GROUPS INVOLVED, THERE ARE PROBLEMS. THE MAJOR PROBLEM IS THE PLACEMENT OF THE SIGNAL. TO PLACE THE SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION, 1) POWER LINES M CT BE MOVED, -4) GAS LINES MIGHT HAVE TO BC MOVED (AND WILL HAVE TO BE GRANTED), AND 3) CLAY STREET MAY HAVE TO BE BLOCKED OFF. 1 THE COMPANIES GET INTO THE ACT AS FOLLOWS: EDISON WILL HAVE TO MOVE THEIR ' ,EWER LINES, WHICH WILL MEAN SHUTTING DOWN A MA.;OR POWER SUPPLY. AMINOIL COMES IN BECAUSE OF LARGE FACTORILS AND RIGS, WHICH RUN ON THIS POWER. IF THE POWER iS SHUT OFF, AMINOIL WILL LOSE A LARGE SUM OF MONEY; ALSO, BECAUSE THE OIL IS SO THICK, SOME OF THE OIL RIGS MIGHT NOT START BACK UP AGAIN. e 1-0rQ $ i ti I CFiEVROV IS INVOLVED BECAUSE OF THEIR GAS LINES ON THE SIDE OF GOLDENW;;ST STREET; •Tr � t+-._ IF EDIS ON HAS TQ MOV E THEIR POWER PQLES, CHEVROtd MIGHT HAVE TO MOVE THEIR GAS LINES. NEXT, I . HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. OWNS THE LAND ON THE SIDE OF GOLDENWEST STREET. THIS LAND WILL BE USED TO EXPAND GOLDENWEST STREET TO ALLOW A SIGNAL. THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. WILL GRANT THE LAND FOR THE PROJECT; IN RETURN, THE CITY WILL GRANT CLAY STREET TO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. BECAUSE THE HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY OWNS THE LAND ON EACH SIDE OF CLAY STR- ET, IF THE CITY BLOCKS OFF CLAY STREET FOR TRAFFIC REASONS, THE STREET WILL BE DIVIDED BY THE LANDOWNER, HUNTINGTON PEACH COMPANY. ,.1 BECAUSE OF THESE DIFFERENT ACTIONS THAT NEED TO TAKE PLACE, FINANCING ,HI THE PROJECT IS THE ONLY REAL PROBLEM. NO COMPANY WANTS FO FINANCE THE WHOLE PROJECT--TfiEY WISH TO FINANCE THEIR OWN PART OF THE PROJECT. � ;+ I I BACKGROUND ON THIS MATTER: In April of 1981, Councilman John Thomas suggested intersection of Clay and Goldenwest Streets. Thomas wasnal refusedhby the Council and the file was put away. It surfaced again in April of 1983. Again John Thomas brought it up to the Council. During these two years, the Council had formed the Transportation CO=ission to r problems. The Commission agreed with Mr. Thomas and thed project With such In action and the Transportation Commission is runningthe ct now p project. This information was obtained from Carl Huy of the Commission. li I I REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL. ACTION Date October 26, 1983 13� Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: C. W. Thompson, City Administratqr P �� by Ctrs' co S Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Wor tJVCy� Subject: 1983-1984 S.B. 821 Fiscal Claim CL� ' Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: T e Orange County Transportation Commission requires a "Resolution of Approval" for the application of Local S.B. 821 Funds. RECOMMENDATION: Approve attached resolution, thereby authorizing the submittal of an application for $38,481.00 in S.B. 821 Funds for Fiscal Year 1983-1984 . ANALYSIS: Staff has compiled a list of S.B. 821 projects for Fiscal Year 1983-1984 . The list, as recapped below, is consistent with the General Plan and the Master Plan of Bikeways. r Project Description Estimated Cost f;r 1) Audible Signals for Blind Pedestrians $15,000 2) Handicap Sidewalks/Ramps 25,000 3) Bols3a Chica State Beach Bike Path 210520 4) Sidewalks Fronting Schools and Senior Citizen's Residence 26,621 Total: $88,141 I` An application for funding will be submitted to the Orange County Trans- portation Commission; however, the application must include a "Resolution of Approval" by Council. Therefore, the Director of Public Works requests approval of the resolution. FUNDING SOURCE: Total cost o 1983-1984 S.B. 821 projects: $88,141 S.B. 821 funds previously received: 49,660 Subtotal: $38,481 Requested allocation for Fiscal Year 1983-1984: 38,481 Balance: -0- ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Deny approvia-1 of resolution and forego a portion of the needed funding for Fiscal 1983-1984 S.B. 821 projects. ATTACHMENTS: Raso ution F.I.R. C.'WT:PEC:DRN:jy I • I 1 cirYOJ• HuNr,�, :-,)n� rc•�c�J ...__. _.._ ' CITY COUNCIL OFFICE :,'' .� �SiG.� GEC°y�Cl'-�./L� G?l�• GZ��x�c.7' �,��, . -� r ezl Ire Ze�-Yr Q c'/cJ .C?: " •moo .L�'Fr' 7Zc,c',J�►" ,,SG�J'jLJ .. . � k 1�f2 �'-�4..�'.c'.f'.�i..4�Iv �t.�i4%LCG2� �2 CC.�•£.i'/,�.�` Q1.�`. .. .����. rr1� . ���GQ/ G�4�C�LC/rJ-- �za'' fr,cQi •,. . . ..,.... , . . . ,., ..•- �' � �. �•� '�'� •ji;ram_'• '7haw� D z. %J i - r •. •. ,may _.� r -w•. -•,.. .. .. ' f' .Is •r tt �.., 77r7777- loop L-2-1 r i �•r iv fA�'�M. .i::�y�e .i -'*A 4•i::+.•'axrRiMa•.t� i./.�(�M:11.• �.'•►'r�)Pwiny�/'.•�1..1•!"A�V4:�• •'„ .�� AWps-0j ... �r • . ,.. I« t •f y.•, ji ti. :,� v.A ».-- -•i.�:r.�r.'�Si 1N.1'1X►�1�,/'•: •� }'T.."•�":r'"q'�"17, 'IV /O REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date April 8, 1983 Submitted to: iia arable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: C. w. Thompson, City Adni.nistrat is -9.3 � /7Pb To -sri or-it— crow"c4 0ec+oa ✓ Prepared by: Paul E. Lb ok, Director of Public Works Subject: Goldenwest @ Clay �W...4> Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments: Ac t g ry iirprnvermnts have been requested by members of the City Council and the public. n iQIMTIONS: i It Is that a project be placed on the F.Y. 1983/04 Gas Tax Project list to twiden the west side of Goldermest Street and provide a southbmityl left-turn lane at the + subject intersection. The estimated cost is $24,000.00. Following the eonpletion of these improvements, it is further reoamended that a new study be oonduc',:ed to determine if it will be needed to enhance safety, by signalixati.on. ANALYSIS: , t 9-council meeting of July 6, 1981, Councilman John lbomas requested that the newly formed Transportation Commission consider the feasibility of installing a traffic signal i at the intersection of Goldenwest and Clay. mhe staff made a study of ttma proposal. and submitted a report: to the Transportation Om fission for the meeting of October 13, 1981. 'ibe report indicated that a traffic signal was not warranted at that time. The 0mrAssion accepted the staff report and recommended that a traffic signal not be constructed at this time, but consider alternative inprovements. At the meeting of May 11, 1982 the Commission reoarrended that Goldenwest be widened on the west side and that a mrthbound acceleration I lane be constructed (see alt. plan 3) . This configuration included the closure cf Clay Avenue, earl -f Goldenwest street. However, this project was not funded and the impact of closing Clay had to be evaluated in terns of the downtmm develcpTent plain and the effect on circulation as a result of development by the Huntington reach Company. The existing volume on Clay between Goldenwest and Main Street is 2,500 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to exceed 6,000 vehicles per day at ultimate development. The problem of this intersection appears to spring prinarily from the combination of speed and a somewhat poor sight-distance due the grade. Hopefully,the widening and installation of a left hand turn lane will take care of Ube problem. If, after review, it is found that it does not, then P signal will have to be installed. The tended plan is the least expensive of the alternatives. It provides a refuge area for southbound left-turn movements and eastbound to northbound movements. The plan is expected to significantly improve the safety of the intersection at minimsm cost. In addition, the reocxsm�u7ed plan widens the southbound approach leg on Goldemmat to Clay Street so that traffic signals could be installed at a future date should they be damned necessary. Ft1i IM SOURM F g or pis project or one of the alternatives would be provided from City Gas Tax Funds. PI O 4181 � request for Ocn=il Action Goldenwast @ Clay April 81 1983 Page 2 ALTERNkTM'ACZTCNS: JVjj ?JrsE alternative would be to place: this location on the traffic signal priority list and schedule the construction in aaccrdance with that priority. The construc- tion of a signal is currently estimated to be. $80,000.00. 2. Alternate two is similar to the recommended plan kith the ey=ption that a raised median would be used to chvmlize traffic. Ube estimated cost of tlri.s alternative is $06,000.00. 3. Alternative three is the plan which was xecc mrended by the Transportation omrdssion. It features the closure of Clay Avenue and a northbound acceleration larem to serve the west approach of Clay Avenue. This alterative is estimated to cost $91,000.00. 4. The null alternative would be to maintain existing conditims and not expend addi- tional funds. Live plans 2. collision diagram CKV:PBC:RRL:jy l � i i r 1 II _ t WA!! l.4ffP-T-T.tf tn/. - i -.� __ ... •'wc� .... :r.; ... � ..,i:1:Tf,lK•�'>�M•��'�t.. .-2».:...�. _ ,r, r _:.. .. ^ ...�-.._, . -�.f..i. _ _ 4 1� i��.w�': b�.�• �L`^.i:�{ fi�.I�Mit��•"r^-w w..w..r-���rr� srRg er AL72WWATE 2 - -.e-. � �.. ._... .. - _...r- .. i _ .. ... ''-r 1, �... ^'-7�. )�.- v+.. _�i.:=''t!'� � :*y,_- � � � ._ •gi• ,. �f �� ..._... _. -. _- STi�F€T !rS/�►Ot//NG s AS"RI ACE -.,_s • AcCl'�CAM.�A rlOAr-l4av� � c ��Y Y& .1 M •�� .�G TEpedV-t r& 3 REQUEb f FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION •�o���ft� ��l i Date August 31, 1982 i Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council D I CITY cOUNCiL Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Adminiet.- j Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public 1+' Sub eat: County-Wide Integrated Traffic SigJa'l"'Sys a cl , I � '5/6 O Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Souroa,Alternative Actions,Attachments: j Statement of Issue: A resolution is required to establish support for the implementation of ! a county-wide integrated traffic signal system. Recommendation: Adopt a resolution establishing support for the implementation of a county-wide integrated traffic signal system. Analysis: In an effort to assure the future effectiveness of the City's proposed interconnected traffic signal system, the above mentioned adoption 13 recommended. The Ciries .of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley have: previously entered into a cooperative agreement for the installation of an interconnected traffic signal system. This system is to be implemented on Warner Avenue from the Pacific Coast Highway to the Santa Ana -River and on. Brookhurst Street from the Pacific Coast Highway to Edinger Avenue. The system will create a smooth flow of traffic along these two highways throughout both jurisdictions. It is the concern of the Public Works Department that without future . . interfacing with other cities, the effectiveness of the proposed systems will be extremely limited. Alternatives: None 1 i Funding source: N/A PEC:KH:lw PIQ 41e1 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date April 3, 1981 -- - - - - — � �7�ti•c.. �lv4 �3'��., Submitted to: Mayor & City' Council Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Administrator Prepsredby: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works' Subject: Petition for Traffic Signal at Brookhurst Street ' and Continental Drive. APPROWD pY CITY CUUNCII. Backup Materiel Attached: pt 1 Yis [ ]No I Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Jeutce.-AUeza-.m., .c t Statement of Issue:: ' Huntington Continental Townhouse Association No. 1 has presented a petition with 114 signatures requesting the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and Continental Drive. Recoum-ndati.on: Authorize a project for fis,.al. year 1981-82 to modify the raised median on Brookhursst Street from Continental Drive to a point approximately 300 feet north of the inter- section. Analysis: Traffic volume counts indicate that there is insufficient traffic on Continental to warrant a traffic signal at the subject location. However, an analysis of the accident histrory indicates that there is a problem at the .intersection; and that a change of the traffic pattern should significantly improve traffic safety at the intersection. i -The collision diagram (See Exhibit A) shows a predomi.nanoe of accidea.;S involving east:- ! bound left-turns conflicting with north-bound traffic. Therefore, a north-bound acceleration lame would separate the decision process into two locations and provide a means for traffic to m xge in a controlled manner (see Exhibit B) . The estimated cost of the modification is $15,000 in 1981 dollars. The median modification will remove south-bound left-turn access into a driveway an the east side of Brookhurst which serves the Sea Shores Apartment complex of 85 units. How- ever this movement represents only 3 trips in the morning peak. hour and 19 trips during the evening peak hour. By comparison, the acceleration lane would be serving 92 trips in the morning peak and 61 trips during the evening p6ak hour. Left-turn access �.nto the Sea Shore Apaxtlrmnts can still be provided by the use of the left-turn lane at Constitution and the frontage road on the east-side of Brookhurst between Continental j Drive and the apartment corrplex (see Exhibit B) . Right-turn access into the apartment complex will be unaffected by the median modification. � Alternatives: Do not change existing conditions. 2. Authorize the installation of a traffic signal. F undinq Source: City Gas Tax Fonds can be usra .for this project. PEEC:RRL:ek / PIG XSI - Exhibit A ► Data ' COLLISION DIAGRAM Time Location Project _ . .. o s Q3 `.. i2 o `iJ Q n z za•eo "N 78 ;��•Bca Y ���,•Yy-7g " ��•25.78 • � 4•Ilo'79 8.25.7�--Po---s -i2•�5.7g I m h ru cc A r- car— Q i � —'` Motor Vehicle Morl *Ahead itar EW -H. - Motor Vehicle ticking Up Overtaking Sideswip -YEW. ' -.+ Pedeatrta» traadstdeTYPE DAY NIGHT TOTAL Cp Paned Vehicle .4Traa Turn i —01 a Fixed object _�;Pci Overtaking Tarn atal 0 O Q r fatal Accide»t t ....+. Out of Control injury a Man-fatal Accident Vehicle Turned Over Ci G Roperty D&%Ve tnlr WIND wd eern Drinking Prop. Damage Only /(p --.-a+— Hecd-an t Daylight 7 ••} head-on Stti pe ts.A p ar► (fhclaAss Dare a Duck) O�dl w / 1 / Exhibit B ' Also +A I I CO Constitution 1 O 0 1m Bismark raAsc-d islarri Owy Cutty §mark i N Continental ' 'ra►.fsoa islar�'�' " �r�A lea Shore A Apartments brick gall raised island A V qb � a -*Note : tLence and landscape could be removed to make N Frontage read more accessible. 1 S - - •. �' � • �� • „, _ �!►�ate. ' �•r5�i �iAr�- HUNOTON CONTIENTAL TOWNHOUSE ASSOC. NO 11 01C. 19601 OROOKHURST STREET • HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA%.IFORNIA 92646 •�� } •T (714) 90-2744 � l AHCEIVED = clrr 11.WR1c ,���• d �! a� l HUN�JNCtC1 3 OF EACH,CALIF. JULY 3Q, 198Q 6�0 is rO Ii to ,e ' f7 t TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH We the undersigned, would like to request a traffic .tight to be instsl:ied at the intersection of Continental and Brookhurst Streets. We feel the tremendous volume of traffic going North ar.d South on � Brookhurst makes it extremely hazardous to drivers trying to make either n 'left' or 'right' into Brookhurst from Continental Drive. i • i Numerous accidents have occured at this intersection. r '-NyvA Calls to Mr. Latham of the traffic department have had no results. 1 His only suggestion was to put up a 'right only sign' at the intersection. However; we feel this to be even more dangerous, due to exsisting conditions. Drivers m:::ing a 'right from Continental who wish to travel North would then have to make a U turn at the island by SAV-ON and the accident rate at that particular point has to be as great as that at the intersection of Continental and Brookhurst. Traffic would be backed up onto Brookhurst creating even more congestion are they waited to make the turn. Also Gars and trucks parked down 11he side of Brookhurst 'ohlitera .a the view of on- coming traffic, when making a right into sroakhurst . There are 752 units in the Continentals •dith an average of two cars per family plus several units in the apartments across the street. For all of these citizens trying to make either a ' left ' or 'right into fifty miles an dour traffic at peak times it is a daily gamble. Sincerely 1 I / J 4. I fI+� I glum - MR 99PORILMY251ar, /,Y/I��,.Z.i'Cj /or lI63 h/•IJ• h its ` fi 6 � �40 q8 4& 1q4 .13 g� lgt'q 3 J C pep" J ` 1 . , A& H+� Dk REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date April 8, 1981 Submitted to: Mayor and City Councill.Z� <�- Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Administrator � � 3 Paul E. Cook Director of Public Works. , Prepared by: � � � Subject: Request for flashing Beacons on Heil Ave. Between Springdale and Edwards Streets at Bra ArFXGVXD NY CITY C Backup Material Attachsd: [ Yes [ ]No 19— CITY ULLA A Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funclin Statement o- Issue: A petition wit approximately 850 signatures has been submitted to the City requesting flashing beacons on Heil Avenue between Springdale and Edwards Streets. Reoommendation: 1. Insta asking beacons at both crosswalks along Heil at an estimated cost of $12,000. 00. 2. Increase police enforcement speed limits during school crossing times. Analysis: According to .section 10-05.2 of the State Traffic Manual, a flashing yellow beacon may be warranted when all of the following conditions are fulfilled: Warrant Met 1. The uncontrolled school crossing is on the "Suggested Route to School"; and Yes 2. At least 40 school pedestrians use the crossing during each of any two hours of a normal school day; and Yes �. 3. The crossing is at least 600 ft. from the nearest alter- nate crossing controlled by traffic sigi.als, stop signs No or adult crossing guards; and 4. The vehicular volume through the crossing exceeds 200 ? � vehicles per hour in rural areas during the same hours the students are going to and from school for any pur-- Yes pose; and 5. The critical approach speed exceeds 35 mph or the approach visibility is less than the stopping distance. Yes ! Item 3 implies that if a crossing g guard is provided at a marked school crosswalk, then flashing beacons would not be warranted since all the conditions are not met. However, the City currently provides 2 ashing beacons at the following locations where crossing guards are employed: I. Springdale at Croupier. 2. Edwards at Cornell. 3. Goldenwest at Rio Vista. (This is not a school crossing. ) No M Request for Council Ac.-ion Request for Flashing Beacons on Heil Ave. April 8, 1981 Page 2 The first two crossing guard locations were augmented by flashing beacons after an accident had occurred and concerns were voiced by the public school officials. The flashing beacons, however, failed to prevent an accident involving a bicyclist at the first location. This accident has resulted in a claim against the City in the amount of $2 million alleging that the flashing beacons were not adequate to protect the public. The flashing beacons at Goldenwest and Norma/Lydia were replaced by a traffic signal as a result of vehicular and pedestrian traffic generated by Murdy Park and Park View School. The crossing at Goldenwest and Rio Vista serves only Central Park and no school is involved. There are two sets of flashing beacons on Magnolia Street. One set is in front of Edison High School serving a marked school, crosswalk. The second set is south of Garfield Avenue and it serves a pedestrian crosswalk. Neither location is served by a crossing guard. See. Exhibit A for loca- tion of all existing locations of flashing beacons. .Exhibit B is a listing of all school crossings which employ crossing guards. The .16isting also includes the number of children who cross at each loca- tion and the average daily traffic (AAT) which passes over the marked crosswalk. The subject area generates about 350 student crossings each day at both locations. A recent traffic count indicates that traffic on Heil Avenue has increased about 37% since the 1978 data was obtained. The number of school crossings remains relatively constant and no significant increase has been detected. The intent of Exhibit B is to show the rela- tive activity at each location. The most recent radar speed survey indicates an 85th percentile of 47 mph within a posted 40 mph zone. Approximately 70% of the motorists are ex— ceedi.ig the posted speed limit. Fui.din Source: .aancing for this project could be obtained from the City Gas Tax account or from revenues derived from fines and forfeitures. No funds are re- quired to implement the second recommended action. f Alternatives: 1. Rem Fvc the marked crosswalk at Heil and Bradbury and require all children to cross at the intersection of Heil and Springdale, which is controlled by a traffic signal. The crossing guard would have to be relocated to that location. The crosswalk and crossing guard at Heil and Trudy would remain at its present location. 2. The same as Alternative 1, but install flashing beacons only at Heil and Trudy at an estimated cost of $6,000.00. i PEC:RRL:jy i 1 j EXH R I T A Legend 0 Yellow Flashing Beacons Red Flashing Beacons \Aj o ! �� .J• f / j I BASHING BEACONS LOCATIONS MAINTAINED BY C"OF HUNTINGMN BEACH huntington beach traffic division EMIT B �'�► 1979 - 1980 SC MM YEAR SCHOOL CUSSING NO. CHIMHEN 1978 LOCATION SCHOOL DISTRICT MISSED DAILY ADY Springdale & Croupier* Westminster 120 16,200 School District Edwards & Onnnell* to to135 15,000 Saybrook & Bradbury Ocean View School 125 22,000 District Heal & Bradbury •' 200 7,300 Heil & Trudy 150 6,0U0 Heil & Redlands 175 8,000 Heil & Sabot " 130 8,000 Heil. & Silver 125 8,000 Heil & Iizoe 200 4,000 Springdale & Palo Alto 70 14,700 Graham & Glenst,one " „ 195 3,500 Cbldenwest & Slater*** 90 27,000 Warner & Edwards*** 250 24,500 Slater & Geraldine " 250 91300 Newland & Norfolk Huntington Beach 175 6,500 ElaTentary School District Nodland & St. Augustine of of 125 b,000 Banning & Malibu it to 120 2,600 Bushard & Banning** " 225 6,000 At-1ant:a & Strathmoor 150 5,400 Hamilton & Northshore it " 1.00 8,700 Bushard & Yellowstone If of 175 10,000 Indianapolis & Savers School to 01300 4,500 � Magnolia & Indianapolis*** If " 225 1b,700 Garfield & Cb1CIst:er " " 125 Hamilton & Spyglass " 250 10,000 Indianapolis & Farnsworth " 120 5,000 17th..& Palm** " " 125 4,000 Yorktown & Rockland Fbuntain Valley 130 4,600 School District Yorktown 6 Brigint..i.ne of to 225 a 600 Yorktown & C hnbearra , " 1'15 4,60U * Augmented with Flashing Beacons ** Location Controlled by 4-way Stop *** Location Ckantrolied by Traffic Signal 1 Honorable Ruth Bailey so Mayor Huntington Beach, California 30� 4WN C noss wA l I� Dear Mayor Bailey; We live in constant fear that the recent incident of a nine- year-old neighbor being struck by a car in a local school crosswalk will happen again. We are a group of citizens deeply concerned about the safety of children using the crosswalks on Heil Avenue between Springdale Street and Edwards Street. We feel that the present school crossing signs are inadequate, and the immediate addition of flashing caution lighte is essential to give motorists adequate advance warning. The two crosswalks are approximately 700 feet apart and are used mainly by children going to Spring View School, Saint Bonaventure School, and Carr P-srk. With the heavy flow of traffic on Heil Avenue, especially during the hours that children have to use these crosswalks, the current 25 IIPH speed limit signs are seemingly not noticed by many motorists who continue to travel through at speeds of at least 40 miles per hour. Children's lives can be protected at minimal cost. Please act in time to prevent a child's death. i •w -001X 4 "vying Virbi a.)rboof 16662 T udcr Lane Hwi twig tore beach, Ca. 92b47 February 4, 1981 Honorable Ruth Bailey, Mayor Huntington Beach, California 1 Dear Mayor Bailey: on behalf of the entire staff and myself at Spring View School, I would hope that the request for caution lights on Heil near our school is honored. There is no question that the installations are absolutely necessary. School children continue to be in grave f danger as a result of rotorists not slowing down between Springdale and Edwards on Heil. I have personally observed mnny "close calls" over the past three years. It will only be a matter of time for another young person to be critically Injurer if something is not done. Respectfully. /gy iC"eorge It. ,kettle an Principal i G11N/hb t '�'.,;+ , .r�i'.t.,`._:..t ..}t. . .. . .; .. ... .', '. . . . . . ..�. . ........ ,�. E. . .,:T'.-.`;iT:.•iy:,,.i� :':w"it;1:c-1 d r .►+ r{�;yy!'.'EA ,r `w 'l•+ Ott..,Vf,,r4 - � � v' - J n ' •, a r w • � ,• � k, rr t�F� . LM .0 — 101Ye �.Ir'.,tic. `t.r,,rN .h. ..+„ r �.,r, t r•.t u �J 7 ��� _y..!' .�,'yr, 1� WC {"� `'i`.V. ��. �.+ i/�tk .�. :V.� 1 ,�l �-c11i,: �' _ �T}• {Vt. .`i. .1 '1}SV• !y V'r•y L'.r' `.a, .\• V/ t :}'� Tt ,,•X F� .k�i ' „� .4 S` ,�1 4� �"�'.�r�': �. r' ! �t r y'�:� t. hw. � .{r�'f L' t,! �, i. '� y._-r 1r .i. y ..f, 4 •T ' ►i'r rf.� •1 � t. tit 'f• �-Y. R� •r-t,1.,+ 4 � .h }, •.t:� �j• .1.�'} `, tr'" ,Y y. :�r ,' r r.'♦ � ,, +.,:y �t�. ''�. ��..� +° aC�,� '.i'-.-,c;�'{•y •ty .�, v n.fi w. '� t. -_..ti ! i,' J'+: t ,r 'T'::� M) t r •� ♦ tr, .t, ,�: 1 � . :.{ t 1 �� •i t ';y..r V.+y t 1� 1';..^ sN� y`," ii�t 'A.*c r'�_ ti t y '} � ,�u. f � t ,.Y 4 ,Sr i. 7��('7 ,` #�l' ta , � •�� 'Y Y v. •r 1rr4' •' � r.-. y� }. •�. ` �. � �� �w - a, 7. * Fo t+ a P3 cl Cl LU b wu It 1MI�F/r• j ^r.,. - L!.,r•i ` , r 1 f�f ,,,,,����YYY••••�jr��•_ t 7 �' .�.r - .. ,. .. �w.w�.ww+r�n.rw.ww�rw�wrl.wi.L�..� i i,r.}•'7f `f,{1. �'v�f 1'r �` } fa 1•'f} L• "i p . •µ}}.{4'(�r11.,-}I!• rY. L,':r 'V� 1 3" .• .. ,1• 1 'tr, ��}4 ,:L}.'n r \ ✓+ ,• q /� ��L. '1�4•�{t V� "�'• ,.wrryrr�. .�a _ `. j r �'.4i IN Ig O'L=7f) I lei. },t�{ ,� '.. QNI�' ••4 � ` U') 1�4.r }•1t t'' Il' 'yam ���^� � _ 71 .,t�t .\' :t•'t , � � w ' t _ +ryt,� � ai, :., 1� }'/ti r'•r' fr' .,.�� 1t• y '� t4 � lls;yyti `. �, ' �Vt q{�' t. ��yi1 �'.tri'�t ,t ,'..�jy� •,� �' I � r 1 1S ¢ � � i'c4. � � �' W .} A •�a 4 t, lr• r'',Fr ti44e otD{• .rgn" `4{;{'� rx..�,t. °2 yx*-i r ..,� �i;kt r. ' `. 1 ,� y+#,',r 1 � r �, !' ���� ''1' � t}. + ' 7�� . ,,.. ,:'{„e •,rt:.1.'t�.b:�'s.l.�f<1�1.,1'�1' �'` F;,'�, 1� �,�'">, :i '�''f •�•rr!' r. y t R-� r, r ttil� � f n t .���� r' ���•j., 'Tv i7lr. ! t+�i1 �• rA(T ,1 t Y J t 3 t .� �, � ,��. �..k_ tl r,.,.. ti r�y'e xh t, [ .`,.' x t ,�•.i ,�] 4� •�,... Yfr1, ��';V'�7[ ,,,� kY P.' sy �x. � �.1•E\t'�r `. Vi1'•Y 1.� ;I+ �t� 1. c�t f ,1;'' i t yi: i f 7 4..•'�:1 i;k�l. 11 I rr11 � 1. ��� 1�dY�••4..� ,.1v�. i.y ��i ['it.. s� F ,S.x 1 { !r' 1� ;.•� +t7! �l,�i[!h.?tR +t �'�, r ..� M f•, x t.7 � tx•. } `.,� y.R � ,'' i .i��. .s . �i }����'�n + "-.� ��a;'� •1%��31�f,�t.�t. }�;r :l'i � Ss� ;4t s r 1`''t � 1 r , I r-� fJ r i, �t•s a! �i`1: h� �.'i fir, v �' � 'r 1 � �� MM�. ���`��t 1, '�-.. it ;r r e:, r +� ..•t. �,i�,t t�y �t � Ix. w,, . .lf,P I.:,. �.1; t r, ��"•t)f3,� .� ,��xA,b•+������_�, :F'-r�;4 i +. '4,�' 'i' ��,iiF `r.Fy,. ' {aM l �i,',y • {f iC`:Y I`t; •,:�ti.,,l �'jt 4��,,����r.1,�a{t. , .ffr! A^�..YY:.� t. �1�',''titti � n r,Y.4, t.'n. hr''7r .rx 1. l,,:t''F•t r. fn..S t, � R 1�1, I ,�,' i3..rry f•'•47, '4 ' � '}ll��t�j 1[{'��r�iJ�}fa��r n r' �t " 1•.r+tt;i,. �:'�[,,11Y`�� it ,y; .�n�, }��}1•y���gtlpki��. ,y�j{- ,4�,+J�..,� Te1.�/sc y�al:. ,� {'� 'i, ,1 « )§> ,. �F�i�tisr •11•r5 1 r.+T,4�`'v` y L,'•YI'{ f,�4,�!'9,.�t.��+'iy.,n�t� i� ����^ J�Sr.� :s �f"�t,t,, ���'�ktr' `r•9 7�yy�r;s�� � � f 1t r. •� , ���t�l�i ���� Gf�i Y� ,� li l '.f'rY 1{� C ,r' � •;•r• fy ,t':r �., � � .� ,�,,,�.Si Y�. ,]+.y.�6 yf � lr;: ��a�� r.,� �' �. f^:Li•,..:�r��y�4t`"�.. �t �� �•;r`, � � r.�., 4ar,11} y lrt A•ntr,.�; .;d•�; ifR.4 fi..t t. /f, f {any r4]' •TL, ` . 4 f Jii. +,r .wiy t� { ar l,. \_,.� ) ay[ e+N^ +6. ^;{•r.� �Y M. ,, � ,•t, x "y„`\R t i ^'' ;Yi"}? li ',�1� .,1tA j�4 y.,1, •� "� Y +. ,.i$ �` y d. t� 4:���,1 :�fl,/�., �� 'i•�: 1 J,Y s i J J4rj 6�, }t ti t '�'� t. I. )}5 ry r 5t1 + u �,,c: fir'r.r .iir ..f.f::ir.. F!.r-rk .7 .� �'.��"•`�l'�; !' a�,/ I t•. � ,Jt � ,."�' ����'� r '�� ; } {, Sl t J *.y tt,tlt� ,� .t�.4 ,~R:ti••,t� •?. .l:r 'i.,r.n• 1, fl r .•�r'nY t:..•�, , f'1,1,n:..rd�•�'Y .4 r�. fri.. v.t 1.. . �,y r'},�`. 'Y .j'�, 1 . 1 i l � • '� 1 - MUM p2m AM Mm r f , ,� . ` City of Huntington Beach -- " P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92643 1� orr10E of THE CITY r_U RK March 27, 1980 Dear Service Station Owner: Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance No. 2416 - Gasoline Pricing, adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach on March 17, 1980. This ordinance will become effective on Apri 1 16, 1980. Ordinance No. 2416 requires that every person offering for sale or selling gasoline to the public from any place of business, post one but not more than four signs which state the price per gallon or liter and the grade or type of gasoline which is not available. Please refer to said ordinance for more detailed information. Please contact the Department of Development Services regarding any questions you may have regarding compliance with Ordinance No. 2416. The phone number for the Department of Development Services is 536-5271. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk At14:cb Enc. y v � i % L J FIRM 'IAoE bERvICE AUVESS CITY / STATE RD.NO GwNC4 / rA^AGER ANNUAL FEE LICENSE, E!F-37 T'' -ww•rr�.• -------•----w-- ------------ ----- --------------- --------•- ---�-�- ------- --- AJuATIC PARR SHELL '�rW6T_0L­S_A GHICA HuhTINGTON dC" CAL 155 "AlONE T OOVE 5b.25 A004992 08-01-60 J* ARCO GOLOENMEST 1T502 GOLDENdEST muNTINGTON OCH CAL 201 JAMES E AhuERS04 3T.50 A026256 05-01-80 00 d C ENTERPRISES /754i _BEACH--- i tltj0Rk___ - 3T.50 .AOAa128 04-01-aa 02 84DUON MARRY CHEVRON 9973-ADAMS HUNTINGTON 8C14 C4L 636 HARRY J BA"02% 6000 A050442 12-Ul-80 Op SCONKE SMELL SERV/SAvL 6502 SOLSA HUNTINGTON OCH CAL 139 KEITH E BEMNKE 41.25 A046158 09-01-80 00 7 dtlSQ_%5_AHEL 17 ji CQLOLhyE-!Sj 41,25 A055116 08-01-80 Do BILL S PAULS K08ILE SLR 1Z001 GOLDEhwEST "ONTINGTON bCM CAL 138 WILLIAM GE JONG 60-JO A,;03412 JT-01-40 jo j dOB*S UNION STATION 16471 BOLSA CMICA HONTINGTON UCH CAL 155 ROBERT 0 TMOrPsou ,_.T5 A003452 07-01'10 Jz _RuclaS UNION SyC jI _ 0092 AD.ANA fj4ftLijw1LEsN CSL 445 J P su;K - 3T•SO A0_ 000 IZ-01-60 um 8U0 A *Get#. SVC 19002 pROOX"uRST HUNTINGTON BCH 3;.50 A051462 04-01-81 00 C't CV3*lrEXACO A ZONING 64TZ alkerlt HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 156 iCHUCR SMERREv 52.50 A041430 10-01-50 Do 40 E*0011 st€ELL 2004t BMxXuRST _._Hyl1Tj�G'O� GGft CAL AA4 C IfA40 t CLYi1 _ iQ#�2s AQ 34C4 11-01-80 Do DAGOFF DENIS UNION SYL 23471 BROOKHURST HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 46t DENIS W DAVOFF 37.50 A039290 06101-80 D0 OENTOm* LEE-CHEVRON 6972 WARNER HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 119 LLE DENTON 37.50 4014:2b 10-01-80 U0 01GK'S SE�!CE_ b001 EaikG _ NyRjIN�,Tpt�gGu CAL 14Q RIARn aAMO!jEP �7,50 AOle:;�____Q3-01.80 gQ 016AS SERVICE STATION 7232 E4tfMT.iR HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 251- DIGAS COiQ t"AlrL- - ;3425 40441644 11-0I-80 130 ECONO OIL COMPANY $OGZ-IlARNER HUNTINGTON BCH CAI. IFS OQUG4AS O;4''COSMAINT 43400 A01Ova+ 07-01-80 O0 's rclaxaM[ SELF• Svc 127,5 I99j4"mEAcc!L_ _._ _ Nuidumaluld MSl1 -Al 432 ALLF_OTL L`sl� -' S7.+Jp, ADLAA"- D22-.-D1'Q1 D2... EXXON STATION 03616 IVO01 BROOKHURST HUNTINGTON dCM CAL 427 HUMBLE OIL R REFINING 41.25 4003506 07-01-80 00 FARACE GASPER UN SVC d971 WARNER HUNTINGTON OCR CAL 264 GASPER FARACE 45.00 AC50456 12-01-80 00 FAST FuEL_OuTI T fla 16742 MAIN ____ft"j_'ariZNe d t1A�?Cd&RL S ALLEL ,dD 3i.3a AOsz+2a _0�i1-0Q�a FRED's MOBIL SERVICE 1#011 MAGAOLIA %UNTlmGT41t 8CH CAL. 424 FRED EMAMI 3ts30 A017666 09-01-80 O0 GART*S EXXON 9001 ADAMS HVNTINGTO1t 8CH CAL 445 GHAR4 KNACHATOURIAN 3T.50 4044512 03-01-61 Da � gEp G �j __�_ Li4Tf &OHO __.tyuHTlK4T0.n_2rA_CkL_J3_9 KEY RA POl&ZlA_c __ 2rt5D.__AQ3Ep12 01041-8L_ On GEORGE*S EXXON 1r222 PACIFIC tOAST MUNTINGTON dCK CAL i73 COMPJ-TUNE INC 486TS A051642 03-01-50 D0 GREEN£•S KARL UNION SVC L6971 GOLDENMEST "umTINGTON bCH CAL 169 KARL QRLENL 37.50 AQZ826d 06-01-80 O0 d GULF OIL GO-LU S1193 155.01 LrDN4ROS NGSOJCm CAL 45 OD CQM05 mp 1c25 -0- I266tL 12`OI'©0_.D0 "ARBOUR GULF 1,6921 ALGONQUIN HbNTlhGTGN BCH CAL 164 SAMAH KHATLIS 41.25 A020242 09-01-aO 06 140051ER SMELL SERVICE 16972 GOLOEMKEST HUPTINGTON BCH CAL 261 MERLE CAGE 37.50 AGOOI68 QZ-01-6t 00 N MUNLAt11-C�1 E�UN --_--_-TGj?_EOIGER HUH;IHGTDrt_BtN C+4�zSLOA!!r �cEf.�-Ei__ _.__ _ AI� �__ +�oa3322 11-si-aD On HUNT VALLEY OC61L 1r472 SEACH HUNTINGTON UCH CAL 273 MICHAEL K14SLAN 45.00 A0QOdI4 07.01-80 00 HUNTINGTON CEhTErf CH4VA rrrT EOINGEK tia HUNTINaTON 8CM CAL 242 GARY KELLET 41.25 A034934 10-01'80 00 to tjAvtT-I4f&TO A IV A 9yL 159ji._P�LtFIt COAST HdhTInG:ON-BCM CAL -15�_�illt�C4t1 wed. _ - - 4t.25_ A010612 Qi-C'1-81 -DO _ HUNTINGTON YALLh£T lIOULL 16001 BCAC;f HVNTINGTON BCH CAL 252 MICHAEL KIbSLAN 4IS25 A001998 02.01.51 00 ! JAMES CHUCK SERV CENTLR T662 EDINGER MUNTIN"704 btH CAL 252 CHARLES C 4AMES 37450 A013212 07-01-80 00 JOLA_UNION_SERVICE_ __ 141T2_eEA�3t-. Hu4IIM •TDlt_#CH CAL _ _2S3__S a PE_K-1 N 45s00 . .A13�fAf4A-Ana 0 DO .•. RAVEL rS TE_XACU 10502 BEACH HUMTIf ;,TGN BCH CAL 413 KArEL p SO IMAM 37.50 404363a 09-01-a0 at +GATT SENIOR SVC STATION 0012 EDINGER 14UNtIf4TON dCH CAL 158 A S KATTENWELL 41.25 A024164 02-0I-8t J0 ! Kr1AIM EXXON 0001 BEACH NUNII"PUN dCH CAL 402 40MA4ZD RnAIR __3.7 SD_�►JO7_T2� 04-01-81 Do KIM XA S TE {D SERY3CE 21 at aR00KHURST HUNTINGTON aCH CAL 473 JpHN C RIN - 37a50 AO09338 Q6.O1-aQ ga LORE GLENN CHEVRON SYL 0971 ADAMS vuNTINGTON 8Ck CAL 434 GLENY A LONE 41.25 A029728 01-01'C1 Do LOU13 CHEVRON SERVICE J002 EDINGER rissNTINGTON tICH CAL 156 LOUIS T. BA_LCA_ _ s8.75 A026142 04-01-81 00 »ANDS {HJCK CHEVRON _ I0O��1�SPgIMi.gALE tiONTINGTON dCM CAL 157 CnARL£S M MANOS 45.00 ADDIV34 07-01-80 UC , .MAX5 900IL SERVICE ivOO2 BEACH H441ING70N UCH CAL 443 MAX 4ENxAMu 75400 4001984 37-01-60 rya J MAY TIet SyC bTATION 0021 MARNEe�_ _ HUNT tNGTQ1L gCft_CAL 263-,WSEPM_ 8A1 R MIuO _ 37,S0 _A00199Z U7-01'80 JJ 14081L SERVICE • 9� TO WARNER HuHfINGN BCH CAL i6S ED%IN t E5 37.59 A05O472 01^01'91 Oa HURRAYS ARCO t6T42 BEACH HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 263 ROLLAND F MuRRAY 3T•50 AQIQd04 ar'01-50 00 � NIZAR*S ARCO 1b501 GLOGpP PEST HuNTINGT0pt_8CM CAL__169 RAZIR EL J�WmA!tj__ _�1059 A046460 05101-80 D0 ;OASIS PL�Ht3 Eh qUt Cunr 0002 pOLSA r1+iNT;MGTON >SCN tAti I-la MORGAWfMOLLERrKADRI 37.50 t.O5�r06 Od•u!•80 Oa 1 1 n u S t N L 3 L I C E N S E S Y a T E M B U S I N E S S B Y T Y E R E G I S T E R . t FIR. NAME SEK/ICE AODRES3 CITY ♦ STATE RO'N0 Ow1*ER / MANAGER ANNUAL FEE LICENSE Ex�•07 TYMI r 1 ---r----- rrrr rrr•rrr•r• •r r•rr�.•r�as• ----- ----------- rr rrr• •rr•r• r,rr• rrr•rrr• ••• U400M1AN KANuGL 6502 EDINGER HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 159 MANUEL OKOURIAN — 37.50 A036312 12.01•a0lt�o RUNEMIkE OIL CO 0962 EDINGER _ HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 159 G L R 1974 TRUST 45.00 A016904 08.01.80 Oa! ORESTIbt STATIONa,-INL_ _114523.RQDKMURST _HuNTINGTON-S L Ctl.CAL _36b_.S±�1NNrR'Rf _-� � �1'1_A311yQtt� Ql-01.Oi oa': i 4AY41 UNION 14972 SPRINGDALE HVRTIMU70N BCH CAL 128 RAYMOND 0 VovE 37150 4039040 05.01'80 Dd,, ROGERS CHEVRON SLR9ICt 18501 BEACH HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 412 ROGER JOSEr" SCH410T s5 40 A013790 07.O—60 Do KOGERS ExxpN _ -.� MAROS_ 'OL'a0 0014 1N_ .. I3 _ T1 .0- .�7Q _ ' KUYAL SHELL SLNVICE 16732 BEACH HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 263 NATHAN JaSLP14SON 3T•50 A002564 07.01•80 On f 4AMS SHELL 19002 MAGNOLIA HUNTINGTON SCt{ CAL 425 SAN 4 CENTJFANTE• 37.50 A000O38 07.01.60 Dal ! SAV�hOt�STAL1Qk __ __ 62q AACjF;: tUAS i mU?#T INGTDN-AIC}I_C.AL__ 45I_SAYr+1UR 0I!- CC-=.�. _ i7.50 AQ0165D_�T�Qj--1 0 j S:'LF'S MOMAWK 815 16990 BEACH KUNTINGTON BCH CAL 263 SELF ENT INC SW 41*25 AO38864 03.01•80 Ob , f 5MITM UNION SERVICE 0012 NARNEit HUNTINGTON BCH CAL Ira TMOMAS 8 SMITH 41425 AOIOT20 06.01•a0 job , SM;Tn•5 JOE Afl�1L Ylc_zi3.02 RxC1F}C_cOAST _ . HONTINGTDK BCH--CAL -462_JOSEpy P .SMITH _ _, i7•SO AQ17802 12.01.79 O SU MUNTIMGTON CHEVRON 20972 MAGNOLIA 98 HUNTIhGTON BCH CAL 455 DELTA PACI+_IC INC 56*25 A020570 11•01.74i Doi r SPRZMGDILE SMELL SVC t6471 SPRINGDALE HUNTINGTON NCH CAL 157 Mil P NEVENt-ELDT *0.75 A020256 10'01'8 Do 5;9VE'$AUT(�TIs!£_51fy� 59T7 TE � DARKER — _ -- 1{YlITI!!liTO�L Etfi��`A� 177 St0-1-EtERT____,. - ---4A_*25 A042SAA at•01- SisJLLER TOM ARCp 545E WANNER HUNTINGTON BCH CAL iiT THOMAS/MAR A STULLER 5200A044160 03.01`. Oo SUPER SEVEN 10001: ADAMS H+1RTINGTON BCH CAL 437 SOUTHLAND CORP 37.50 A030510 04.01`50 00 -_- - -TATLOR_uK1Ux-3V"-TR- - T-61 K011i ER_ - . HUNT.ING fog_BGH-CAL_..261_JnMN-A-fAj�LOR ---- -3�'�0_.�IOLZi02. DL._OMO op TMOMAS ARCU SERVICE 10972 BEACH ►NNTINGTOm 8CH CAL 413 AOLT MANNA THOMAS 37450 A050340 12.01-00 Do r" _ -TnDMAS UNION 3VC 1097E BEACH _ HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 412 AOLY M TM09.' ; 37.50 A042352 11.01•a0 Do '. rA�TxE��MELt S dYICc nrTi MNEP. �nUNjINGTIIK BC4t [At 2.03 YA�T!tQ1aMQYA� 17.SO A02A3a0 10.02•AD On nESTSIOE COIN OP LAUN 3=4 isLEYENTN HYNTINGTON GC" CAL 453 C R BRADSHAW 3T050 A046016 05.31.80 Od i f AMITE'S GP,EG ARCO 14502' VOLSA CRICA HUNTINGTOM BCH CAL 166 GREG MHITE 37450 A046356 02.01-61 00 - -.1LN-A10-t T-4T1o"S 19472-DEACtf �iV. gT�l_BseH��:t f2��A.1.LF 1►.SI E � ETIl4t._. _ 1i_650 Ot, U 04•QIIOBB Od + © : MURLD 0i. 868 0972 ADAMS MUHIINGTOH BCH CAL 444 RIBOST INC 3T•50 A331170 04.01-80 00 i _- ____.AWERA _ -s 42881 TOTAL L ..Ns: FEIE3 THIS CODC • 3s 534 3 yetitsts • 4 . BL60-01 C I T Y O K U N T I y G T U N 9 E a C H 03r26-80 PAGE on B U S I N E 5 5 L I C E N S E b y SC T E M B U S I N E S S B Y T Y'6 £ R E & 15 T E R - f RM—NAM , !' 5ERVICE ADDRESS CITY.. ! STATE_, RD.-NO OsNEfl- / .MAKAGEP-` ANNUAL FEE` LICENSE EXP+DT TYt' r-rwAlr�-rrpw i - s.r Y�O- 'iY-r---rr--rM-w -w--LSr---w rrrw-l- - :1----w 1-- A"GUAT3C ' PARK SHELL10001OLSA CHICA HUNTINGTON UCH CAL :35 ViAYNE T DUiE 56- 5 A009992 0 -U1-80 Do 3 ARLp_GdtOENwrST 17542 GCLOENrtEST HUNTINGTON BCi CAL 281 JAHES E ANUERSQN 37-50 A026266 05-01-30 00 '' j •8' C ENTERPRISES ;7 01 BEACH HUNTINGTnm 05H CAL 262 CHAPIN b UEAR7 -A7-50 A048328 09-01780 00 iaADD0N ,ijARRY CHEVRON i0,y71.. ADA-MS HUNTI►r(j7 104 13C,4'-CAL: 436 HARRY j UAUDON 60.00 A050,)42 12-CI-80 Qb '•'� � '• 8£HNKE" SH>rLL SERv/SAVE 6502 8Q1.5A µt CAL IEHNKE + I -25 A04tl758 09-01-80 DN t dEN50tv5 SHELL ' ,� YTJ_N�r- hL 9CR_CAL_ 149 ELE�i *!OR BETTY MURPHY 4: .25 A055116 —05 _fl Lf$0 .D� DILL S PAULS MOBILE 5LR 15001 GOLDENKEST ogUNTI`%3TQN 801 CAL 138 WILLIAM DE JONG 60000 A003412 07-01-80 D0 d0gtS UNION STATION 16471 BOLSA CHICA HUNTINGTON BCH CBI, 155 ROBERT D TMOMPSON 48975 A003452 07-01-80 Do <! � SUC_K 'S UNION SVC II 4002 ADAMS HUNT INGTt]"r 8CN CAL J P BUCK 17s50 A03054_0_12 9L't3�i?n ,aUNTINGTflN -o' 6 S �t�e�.3IL SVC 19002 BRUOKHURST ".rt� CAL .. 426 E'+�ERETT. E tATHERTI7N 37 s50 A051462 04-01-81 Da Lid CHUCK'S TEXACO TONIreG 6472 EDINGER f+UNTINGTON BCH CAL 156 CHUCK 'SH=R4ER - 52-50 A041430 IO-01"80 pc � CLINE•-CLINE, SHELL 2t10g1 BRtIDKHU05T HMXT ±7 BCH c L. 4ab ODNAl D.�qN� 1�_� A041674 �I-g1-asL_D� DAGOFF UENIS UNION SyL 21471 BROAKHUP.ST HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 466 DENIS R DAutOFF 37.50 A039290 06-0I-80 DO it OENTON, LEE-CHEVRON b972 "ARNEK HUNTINGTON ETCH CAL 179 LEE DENTON 5?•50 A014426 10-01-$0 Do � OICK •S SERVICE 6001 EDINGER tjWNTINnTON SN CAL I48 ICHARn nAKpNEft 37 .50 A037aIQ__ 03-01`Ei0 inn "t DIGAS SERVICE STATION 7232 EDINGER HUNTINGTON 8CH CAL -51 DIGAS CO/DtLANARE 41 .25 A044Z)44 11-01-80 00 ' „l ECONO OIL- COMPANY 5002 tiARNER HUNTINGTON E1Ck CAL 176 DOUGLAS OIL COMPANY 45-4o Ao14984 07-01-80 00 3 ----EC-aNQmY SEI,E _5'C1, 1176 19971 REA;H _ H_1ik�TH; 9LlL_CAIr 432 Glit F _U_rl- .-u2_!t L=6-1-0a_ ; EXXON STATION 03616 19001 BRQDKHURST HUNTINCTOu dCH CAL 427 HUMBLE OIL b REFINING 41 .25 A003806 07-Ul-80 Uo ..; FARACE GASPER UN SVC 0971 WARNER HUNTINGTON 6CH CAL 264 GASPER FARACE 45 .00 A050456 12-01-80 Un J FIST FUEL QlLLLET a14 1tl74�MAIN HWylTala C_y lAL 262 CHARLES ++ILt EY J_4, _ 17. ;D A03" x7b Q4-s1 ':� FRED•S MOBIL SERVICE 19011 MAGNOLIA HUyTINGTON 8C� CAL 424 FRED E40-.1 37950 A01?666 09-01-50 Dc GARY•S EXXON 9001 ADAMS HUNTINGTON bCH CAL 445 GHARO KHACMATOURIAN 37.50 A044812 03-01-81 D0 � { GEORG fS Exx. q 11471 LQEN+�E_ _ ___.WUATIN_fxJA2h__Uk CAL Ij_xEVDRK POlt�yAN__ _3�:�9�Q .&12_---03�_L'_i'81_.D_�_- °r GEORGE'S EXXON 1/222 PACIFIC COAST HUNTINGTON UCH CAL 173 CQMP'J'TUNE INC 46,75 A051042 03-01-80 00 GREENE'S KARL UNION Svc lb9 71 GQLpENgEST HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 169 KARL iREENL 37.50 A026268 06-01-tlo GULF OIL GO-LU S1193 15501 f_DWAROS HUNTINGTON L4C0 Cat 1413 90N C13MBS KFP 41 .25 A037264__�2'01"ts} HARBOUR GULF 10921 ALGONQUI`+ HUNTINGTOti dCk- CAL 164 SAMAH KH:+T1B 41 #25 A026242 09-01-8C D0 f HOOSIER SHELL SERVICE 16912 GoLOENnEST HUNTINGTflN SCh 'C AL 261 MERLE CADE 37.50 40oolba 02-°)1-81 D0 � HUNT f3CH CHEVRON 7012 -EA ER _ _ HPATINGlatl_a�A_:gS. 251 9_A_Rl__K ELLEY _ _�_l!� a0u332+�._11'0L'99_Dss_ 3i HUNT VALLEY MUSIL 17472 BEACH HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 273 MICHAEL KISSLAN 45s00 AOU0814 07-01-80 Dv HUNTINGTt3N CENTER cmEvtt 7777 EDINGER 98 HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 242 GARY KELLEY 41 -25 A034634 10-01-80 Do " HuNTINiiTaN mAgIWA SHELI. 15922 PACl l Ct�AsT 5 Y ' �' �llliltL�.i GT�3u UCN CAL 1-1 R[lN SCHIRMc u� ,25 AOltiB� fl3�01-BLO;s____ 31 HUNTINGION VALLEY HOB1L 16001 BEACY HUNTINGTON UCH CAL 252 MICHAEL KI SLAM 41 .25 A001998 02-01-81 DO -JAkES CHUCK SERV CENTLR 7662 E014VGER HUNTINGTON 8CH CAL 252 CHARLES C TAMES 37.50 A013212 07-01-80 Do JOSS UNIO::_ SERVICE 16172 BEACH _ .HU_RjLbGTQN CAt, U3 JUSFPM A!.AE# SCHF_fi 4 lie(ta h0104 6 _47-41-8n Dn KAMEL•S TEXACO L0502 BEACH HUNTINGTON BCH ;,AL 413 KAMEL B SULIMAN 37.50 A040836 09-01-30 pt ' KATT SENIOR SVC E'ATIuN 6012 EDINGER HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 158 A S KAztTENUELL 41 .25 A030764 02-01-81 Da •= KHAI+R EXXON 20001 BEACH HUNTING ON UC4 CAL 442 MUHA4ED KHAIR 37.50 A047724 04-01-81 Do � KIMS TEXACO SERVICE' 21SoI BRUOKMURST HUNTINGTON SC+ CAL 416 4d_) N C KIM 37.50 A009338 06-01-80 'on It LOPE GLEN;i CHEVRON SVC- ..0971 ADAMS HUNTINGTON $CN CAL . 434 G_ENN A LORE 41 -25 A029726 01-01-81 Do LOOS CHEVRON SCRVICE 5007- EtilNGER -HUNTINGTON -BC - CAL. 156 LOUIS - T . BACCA 48475 A026142,- 04-Ul-81 Q0 ' '^ MANUS CHUCK CHEVRON 10001 SPRINGDALE HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 157 CHARLES R MANUS 45.00 AOG1934 07-01-80 Un 1 HAXS MOBIL SERVICE 2UU02 BEACH HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 443 MAX BENWARU 75.OG A001984 07-Ul-80 D0 MAY TIRE SVC STATION 0021 "ARNER HUNTINGTON 8Ctt CAL 263 JOSEPH R R17ZO 37-30 A001992 07-01-80 Do � •: : ML'9.i1• . SERVICE _ ,:4�95 t�A`RtiER HUP.TINGTON BCH CAL 165 EDWIN .0 BA IFS 37s30 A450472 01-01-81 00 ! '. Mi1RRAi�S Ai?C.II.:= `..2:�742 nEAC}t H'.'NTINGTflN . BL'N'. CAL 263 eOLi,ANfl F MtlRRA 3�•S0 AOi0804 01-01-80 DU i.,- ni -rtrzmulls --AR Q' _ 4_ 16501 '_ UJ:UEMii£ST• HUNTINGTO!!-BC.�;tAL 169 t�A2iR EL •JAwHARY 3T:50 AO�i8460 Ob-01�80 r 3: OASIS PETRO ENERbY CUnr CU02 BOLSA ►1UNTINGTON BCH CAL 138 MORGAN/HOLLER/KADRI 37-50 A055406 08-01-80 Da 33 •, c BL60.01 � C I T Y O F H u N T I N G T 0 N B E A C H 03-26.80 PAGE OO2 8 U S I M E 5 5 L I C E N S E S Y S T E M 8 U S 1 ',: E 5 5 8 Y T Y N E P E Q I S T E R c FIRM NAME SERVICE ADDRESS CITY '/ STATE RD'NO OrthER MAriAOER ANNUAL FEE LICENSE EXP-DT TYr � Fes' )tt r•rwrrrww ' _ �+eM.awor--ss-ys- •rr•rwrrl:�w• 'sw•wr- -r-t..r r.ir •!!jf iVf r• C it rr•wrwrrww ww•rwr• . r�n.1r w ww ,; {' OKOORIAN MANUEL 0502 EDINGER HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 159 MANUEL OKOURIAW 37•5G A030312 12-01-80 Do ( POHERINE OIL CO 0962 EDINGER HUNTINGTDN bCH CAL 159 G L R 1974 TRUST 45.00 A016904 08-01000 Da PRESTIGE STATIONS INC ?1452 BROOXHURST HUyTTNGTnN�SM CAL 46Z iLSs(TNmER for) 5 - - - - -r-13!.75_Ag.L�DI,. -01-7! sL�Ld ' RAY'S UNION' _ 14972 SpRINsDALE HUN7InGTON 'UCH CAL 128 RAYMONO 0 UOVE 37#50 A039040 05001"80 Oc t• ( " RUGERS CHEVRON SERVICL 16501 BEACH HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 41Z ROGER JOSErH SCHM OT 45"00 A013798 07-01-80 Da ' R8G RS EXX(jN 15471 EpriagQ5 liW.UrlSLZ11t>L til CAL 138 RDf:ER G LArGTNT 31.50 Aa1roZfl�9L0�'SCLD° " RWYAi. SHELL SERVICE 10732 BEACH- HUNTINGTON bCH CAL 263 NAT►'AN JOSLPHSON 37.50 A002564 07-01-60 00 it "I SAMS SHELL 19002 MAGNOLIA HUNTINGTON bCH CAL 425 SAM N CENTUrANTE' 37"50 A008038 07-01.80 Do � t' 'f SAY-MOR STATIUN 620 PACIFIC COkST HUNTINGTON uCt CAI. 451 SAV•y40H OIL CQ%, Ct 37.50 _A00485C q7-U.10_80 Uti " SELF'S MOHAMK $15 109y0 BEACH HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 263 SELF ENT INCS`L r c'. ( 41 •c5 A048864 03 O1 80 Jn �:( '• SMITH UNION SERVICE 0012 WARNER HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 178 THOMAS 8 SMITH 41 ,25 A010720 06-01-80 Do w€ " S!�J_TH.L5 ARC 15£Rv iC 2I _Q PACIFIC COi15i �ii�1�ILbS�ltl�ti_t C LC�I 46.�JII.SEPH P SMITH ��,50 A01730 T9 Un—� SO HUNTINGTON CHEVRON 2U972 NAUNOLIA 98 HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 455 DELTA PACIFIC INC 56.25 A02d570 11-01079 De SPRINGDALE SHELL SVC 10471 SPRINGOkLE HUNT114GTON dCH CAL 157 RM P NEUENtELOT 4do75 A02d258 10-Ol-30 Dp r STEi EsS ±t1TOMUtIVE 5VV 597 sMAiiiYER kLLf TINGTO'ti! grA CAS 177 STEVEN EVERT 41 *25 AOtt25@ J _M_ _!_ 1 Do ST$JL=ER TOM ARCO 5981 WARNER HUNTINGTON -IC►i CAL 167 ThoMAS/MAH ' A STULLER 52.50 d044160 03-01"81 Do SUPER 5EVEN - 10001 ADAMS HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 437 SOUTHLAND LORD 37.50 A030510 04-01.80 Do � TAILOR UttTnu 5 C_CTR __TA-6-L-ED-LNG E R CAL--41 Jnli H T_AYLnR 37.5n �QL21II2--0�r0i��0__Dss_ THOMAS AMCO SERVICE 10972 BEACH HUNTINGTON 8C4 CAL 413 AULY 4ANNA THOMAS 37.50 A050340 12-01.80 Do � 1=� THOMAS UNION 5VC 10971 BEACH HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 412 ADLY H THUMAS 37950 A04[352 11`01"80 00 � I' VA KEM SHELL SERY:Cc a471 NARNEg. UN=iNb VATE DiH4YN 37.50 J2 o1 • 4N C __0 9 De NESTSIDE COIN OP LAUN 324 ELEVENTH tturtTINGTON dd,{ CAL 451 C R BRADSHAW 37.50 A0460:6 05.01.60 Do E_, =► OMITE'S GREG ARCO 16502 BOLSA CHICA HUNTINGTON BCH CAL 166 GREG "HITE 37*50 A046356 02-01081 Do j MINALL STATIONS 19472 99�+4Cij t�4 U..rL SAL2.} ALEN L — 3Ta5 _AOG4T _. '81 ► Q _19_�� ' AORLO OIL 968 0972 ADAMS HUNTINGTON bCH CAL 444 RIBOST INC ?7650 A031170 U4.01•30 00 xi j A Arse. L2�th5E . E -THIS` •Z�ss 42•61 :TOTAL. L c:Er.SE FEES Th S CODE 3r153+ 5 d D 4ICE'45E5 74 _ It 1: u • z , let � �� 1 rj• tnrrtr.4roh atstt ` J, 1 S k To Jerry aramlett Prom Alicia M. Wentworth Data Processing !Manager City Clerk , Subject Ordinance 02416 - ,Gasoline Pricing Date March 25, 1980 Request For Program Print-out 4 It would be very ipuch appreciated if you would provide this office with a printout of all those businesses coded "DB" - Service Stations. 1 This request is.,, 6# pwrsuant, to Council Is,adoption s,adoption of Ordinance No. 2416 - Gasoline Pricing, which will be effective April 16, 1980. This office ;rust have the names and addressess of the service station businesses so that we can mail copies of the ordinance in tirrz f7or the businesses to comply. Please call , if you have any questions, Extension 5405 Alicia AMit:CD cc; Captain EcKstrom, Police Department I j i %• Grry ®ir IHUNTINGT©N BEACH .� INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION f iu�.i iwaiti st�c►� f I To Alicia Wentworth From License Deportment )M.Terrill) City Clerk Subject ordinance #2416 Date 3-24-80 "Gasoline Pricing" Effective 4-16-60 Per your morn of 3-20-80 xe the above subject, we feel that the bent method to ase in contacting retailers of gasoline would be for you to submit a request to Jerry taramlett o" Data Processing zor a special program. and printout: of all those businesses coded "DB" (Which is service stations) . Prom that you can get the the business namo, nddrese, and wner:-operator's iv me. If you need any further help along this line, please call 5450. I' Mona Terrill I i i i 20 ` YrN / �.' �• !�' CITY OF iHlUNTIItlGTON BEACH `'k INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ur atfw.NYv eracn To Dan Brennan - License Supervisor From Alicia M. Wentworth j . 1 Subject Ordinance 02416 - Gasoline Pricing Date tlarch 20, 1980 Effective on April 16, 1980 The City Council adopted Ordinance tta. 2416 "Gasoline Pricing" o7 tkarch 17, 1980. The ordinance will become effective April 16, 1980. Attached is a memo from the Police Chief asking if a method has been f set up to put all gasoline retailers on notice of the new ordinance. i If your office would supply us with a list of the narnes and addresses of all Vie gasoline retailers in t:ie City, we could mail a copy of said ordinance to them. If it would be Easier for you to cont::ct Chem, we co6d provide you with the necessary amount of forms. Please contact me as to the manner in which you think the retailers should be notified. Alicia 1'. cc: Bud Eeisito , Capt. Ekstrom I f a� CITV OF MUNTIM42TON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To ALICIA }TMMR'IH From T.A.RI.I: W. RoBiTAILLJ�� t City Clerk Chief of Police Subject ORDT.NANCE 0 2416 - Onto MAR(1I 19, 1980 GASOLINE PRICING I{ ( Have we set up a method to pat all the Rasoline retailers on notice of this new ordinance? i I EWR/cah I Enclosure cc: Mr. Aelsito Capt. Ekstrom I i i f REQU ST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTICN�rI � ft.,A 80-�.1 m)mittedby Flo d G. B 1Sito ,�„•,r„. Department Administration ').0l. Prepared February- 2 , 10__89 Bn-kup Material Attached ® Yes C] No •;,,I,�,�I:t _ GASOLINE P ICING ORDI ANEE City Administrator's Comments Approve as Re comm nded Imo✓ Statement of Iwo, F ecommwwUtlon,Anclysis, Funding Sousa,Alternative Actions: Statement of lsaue: , 11 the Council meet1no of F,tbruary -19 , 1980, Councilman Robert .Mandic, Jr. j equested that an o' ih'fcle be on the next Agenda which would require gas stations to post theirliarices . i Recommendation: Discretionary rith Cou Gil . i Aria Iysi . : This ordinance is patterned from the ordinance adopted by the County of r Orange. It requires sjigns to state 1 ) the price per gallon or liter, and 2) the grade or ty'pe of gasoline which is not available. Attached is a letter (rota the County of Orange regarding enforcement . Funding Source: No funds are necessary. 1 I i fI 1 I � ►oo ]ne �' ( ��.�L,►f`iTY l"�F IIIINIY AI,MIM11n.►tl\L IIIIILIAI IIIII Lill ALIbII Ia I;.I IIAt./.N • •� I �.. 10CIVIL ClN11.11 PLA;,. I r` %ANIA ANA.CALIrUIINIA 92►o1 + ICLEatiow; 8J4:J45 RAN C F— ANEA CODE 114 v COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE February 6, 1980 4' Mr. Dao MacAllister. Mayor IA-lih' City of Huntington Fisch nj�+ , D Post Office Box 190 Q,�1/Ur�l/�� 1�'�n Huntington Beach, CA 92648 co/j /` tow Dear Mr. MaCIAll titer: Attached is a copy: of the ordinance you requested in our January 28, 1980 letter to this office. y To date, the Sher0cls office has received only one complaint. The problem was resolved when an officer gave a copy of the ordinance to the station owner and he agreed to post the signs as required. Yours truly G t+, �. . Thomas County Administrative Officer HET/KPR/mo Attachment � I r I I (N((NNAtif*NO 1156 A1/1 d1111NAm.) ill lost(AMArItY(I, MIANCIV (*At It Of1N1A,nt IXU14Nt. lost I4)\ttNli Of 5111./fS At SLIIVILI.S:AIIONSV0111 ll W(hCAll loll 111M.1 ql GASH{trot 11Eltll.0FO(140 trill SAtk AND VOiLlottaANv I.IIA10 Ill (W.011t1r hnsIMAUN AVAIIABIr 15 N01 ItsIN(i OF/tIIFG I nil'.At I the Nna•"ol SwMrnsn10InoCcuriy to U•a,,oe.Cal.tnln.a.odes tvaim as hfltowa SECTIONS Ar1sc►•t 21 is hasbr added to Division]of Tule 5 of the COd1►,od Ofd'nsncas of this COUMV of Camp"10 real As 10110ers. ARTICLEIt GASOLINE PRICESIGLN& lot h.l1tS S-G,%%I VQWm W F V"r ltrr"1118W O(V Inr la►e se tall(-)aUWA..a Io 1M I+uirN[II u.n on (01.of 0 M tvtlntss&of«renl to a Off II..'1 Or hip h♦ay thafl U.Iola r In A"lh WW WI Ih.N 11 I$ rh.fllr risible from e"y sbslel Or hlVhwar a.dlacont to the pf e+"att 0 IeAll One Ill bill not nvne Man tow(41 s•nna of Kh UNf mile tAl lho its t%ml W Kos prit CallOn is Islet.MClUdfng lalett of OW.h`'1.*S*91 QA%Wsf A ! Itrino Wits of DIImM by Nit 110r"1710 pranlsas, I")w►+elhOtItnyQfIldeOl COW"norrn411FOI►etW 101 saoalr0'hIl a[N1m,IMa Lwfonrh not bat"4 tlfwon Oar ule Sm 9 3-116 SW sfte. Anv S.�"I equ+roll 0y Ih.a At Itc V f.1ltl nM a used 11va^Iy(.I1110u1•tMl 1n>r H $.■ S J SII Ccrltlfll.Wltlf"-Ill Slate law Any shin ory.nted by Iflls Atl.tk shall mM Ili)1a0ulranUnls Of All•tle S kommenr-ty Willi&VIK"7(rilD1 of Cnwtar I a1 D.ws.an S at I"(..Y1.iofn.a ButlAms.W4 Ploollo ns Cats S.+c 53316 Ahnusll minotts Ift"t Mal b►6"6"uml rw/er►of this 0+dlnance SECTION! T/wwOmanteshaO last NIOCtaMtoin twit ItrreIffalrlXII(Mis ff t."a•Id of la fit pAlllalp,sr+d btlpr a lfy er G«al►on M f.tl~I15t d sl s A14.11-4 tm'• von 1r11'ffYll sl-ot Lill PUNIP'"I ill the Grano"City 140w11 a 1M'A..IWp... t+uhlly"ftllnlfMlti011nlyOGOrar+pu.Slat.ulCa'Itahfa.lr 1110 W+Itsib"nam"Of the rnn."twit CA The ftort!Of Upwi'ft.sas tolmp lar Mind against Ir+e taf"e PHILIPL ANTHONY 1, Gfa•t rtun 01 Ilia 1)p>tId OI Sup+Nt 1a(1/t \f/ 0/GanVeCA.1nt i.l;al+ItYMa AItf%l ISF.At I JUNE ALEXAMOER Clen e►ohs Bcard M Supertts ir► cc Ormir County.^.auforn s STATE(IF CALIFORNIA ) Iw COUN T YOf ORAM06 I $,JUNE ALEXAM09N.Cllr kol ltta lloardet Supw r.tat s,do net sbl t w tills t-t A M.N mgf.Iy mO ding DI NM Boar d 01 fuper v ISM I of Of 1R'(It+O:OuM V.Cal.lornla.h14d �.•, 06 ma IMh day of 3Ntterribo.)PIS.ihs larspanp ao.nAnn mnu+n.no 1*0 12) sacioin1 was passed and adopted by I►t,follotrlrp vole AYES SUPERVISORS RALPH B CLARK.THOMAS F AILEV. HARRIETT M WIE06A.E(SISON W MILLER t ANn PHILIP L ANTHONY N(WS WPI'lIV1UMS NONE All•1 bi •dn'1'fIY1fIaIS flfipF i Ili YAlrl1',%Willi off 0V 11—of mud"AM...f fU+.l....l.lih.al Pwn.11n..r "..Loll. ILLI..IUt!.q..rlry V.1 lbl•C,4M.nlY ul M AIMOn.SlMt•Alt(7.wJ.+l+.t IhH )mf,41.1f..i u,Y•1.a.lfrw. 14(+f 1 r'.t AI 1 Jtoo.L Al t sANDAI It t.lf r b fit(lM D.a1110►Sl11.7 t.so a rd i r.rvle Cavn 1 Y.fnr•f d ny . f'.4.I..Ir.1 Ik—j"(..iy N.•+t •sYdwl•Lr Also fills � ' \a- F k /off ��� CITY OF I�UNTINGTON BEACH a4 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION WININGTON 51AC11 To Paul E. Cook From Ralph R. Leyva Director of Public Works Traffic Engineer Subject Traffic Signal Priority List Date October 4 , 1979 This priority list of new traffic signals is in response to a request by the City Council at a recent meeting. The list includes traffic signals which have been recently completed or are under construction its well as those which we expect to be constructed in the next few years. The first 15 locations are in priority based on a point system which is related to traffic volumes and accident potential. The rest of the list is based on our best judgement of anticipated growth and traffic demand. Estimated No. Location Remarks Cost 1. Newland & Atlanta Award contract 11/5/79 $ 80,000 2. Goldenwest & Palm Award contract 11/5/79 72,600 3. Goldenwest & Ellis (Ph. I) Award contract 11/5/79 88,000-(Inc. 4. Goldenwest & Norma Energized 10/1/79 72,000 road wk) _ 5. Goldenwest @ G.W. College Under construction (U.C.) 69,817 6. Edinger @ G.W. College To be completed Jan. 180 74,858 7. Slater r Newland U.C.-Completion Dec. 079 90,500 8. Slater & Gothard U.C.-Completion Dec. 179 90,500 9. Slater & Edwards Award contract 11/5/79 73,000 10. Gothard & McFadden U.C.-Completion Mar. 180 82,750 11. Talbert& Gothard Bid in Dec. 179 73,000 12. Main & Delaware Bid Spring 180 80 000 13. Warner. & Nichols Bid Summer 180 760000 14. Yorktown & Coldwater Bid March ' 80 75,000 15. Gothard & Ellis U.C. Completion April'80 78,000 16. Yorktown & Newland Bid Summer'80 790000 17. Beach & Terry Bid Summer 180 83,000 18. Beach & Taylor 1980/81'F.Y. 85000 19. PCH & Seventeenth Bid Summer 180 85,000 20. PCH & Eleventh Bid Summer 180 85,000 21. Goldenwest & Talbert 1980/81 F.Y. 810000 22. Brcokhurst & Banning 1980/81 F.Y. 85,000 23. Brookhurst & Bushard 1980/81 F.Y. 850000 -24. Newland & Indianapolis 1981/82 F.Y. 88,000 25. Graham & McFadden 1981/82 F.Y. 88,1000 26. Bushard & Cunning 1981/92 F.Y. 89f000 27. Graham & Heil 1981/82 F.Y. 89000 28. Springdale & Slater 1981/82 F.Y. 90,000 n 29. Springdale & Talbert 1981/82 F.Y. 92,000 30. Edwards & Talbert 1981/82 F.Y. 90,000 Traffic Signal pri.oritX Lkst October 4, 1979 f Page 2. The recently purchased traffic counters will assit in setting priorities for those locations which are not scheduled for install- ation of a traffic signal in the near future. Therefore, this prior- ity list will be updatee periodically as new information is gathered. Additional traffic signal work is included in this memo to provide you with a more complete list. Traffic Signal Modification Es Itimaf:ed No. Location Remarks Cost 1. Goldenwest & McFadden Add left-turn phases $ 71,388 2. Springdale & Bolsa Add left.-turn phases 85,875 ! 3. Springdale & Skylab Add left-turn phases 54 ,779 4. darner & Goldenwest Add left-turn phases 881000 5. Brookhurst & Garfield Add left-turn phases 85,000 6. Brookhurst & Hamilton Add left-turn phases 85,000 Traffic Signal Interconnect P...oJects Estimated No. Location Remarks Cost 1. Beach Blvd.-PCH to San Diego Frwy. Completed $1,0190660 2. Edinger Ave-Bolsa Chica to Beach Bled. aid Jan. '80 655,000 3. Brookhurst-PCH to Garden i Grove Frwy. Bid 1980/81 F.Y. 1,814,000 I1 4. Warner-PCH to Santa Ana River Bid 1980/81 F.Y. 465,000 Funding for these projects is expected to come from F.A.U. , A.H.F.P. , State, and City Gas Tax Funds, if the projects are included in the Capital Improvement Program. Some projects will include contributions from developers or other private sources. Priorities of the projects way also change as a result of funding sources which may be accelerated ' or dela ed. i RRL:ek 1 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by Floyd G. Helsito, Acting Department Public Works _. Director ­ST Pu liB Works Date Prepared September 10, , 1979 Backup Material Attached 9 Yes Q No Subject Sign Maintenance City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: I Statement of Issue: The maintenance of warning and traffic control signs must be kept at a high level in order to maximize traffic safety and minimize exposure to liability for the City. Recommendation: Approve a permanent full-time position of Maintenance Worker Senior to be assigned to the 416 account, Field Services. r Analysis: Until March 1975, traffic sign maintenance was performed by a permanent full-time position (see memo dated 6/8/79) . After that date, the duties were assumed by a Maintenance Worker CETA. The last person under the existing CETA program will be terminated on September 23., 1979. Since new CETA program does not provide the proper level of funding for this iimportant function, it is requested that a permanent position be approved. ' The use of CETA personnel for this maintenance function is not desirable for a number of reasons: 1. A Service Support Worker II (CETA) earns a flat rate of $640 per month. 2. The duties of sign installation and maintenance require a knowledge of the State of California Traffic Manual and familiarity with the provisions of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Deviation from accepted standards could result in liability for the City. 3. The person performing the duties is assigned to a sign maintenance: vehicle which is equipped with a two-way radio. He works independently and therefore must be very reliable. In addition, he is entrusted with keys to the Corporation Yard and must respond to reports of missing stop signs after normal working hours. 4. His record keeping duties include the maintenance of two daily logn which indicate the date, time, location, materials used and labor costs. This information is uded by Risk Management for recovery of damages P17 317e 1 Request for Council Action Sign Maintenance September 10, 1979 Page 2. 'I to City property, and for billing to the State for sign maintenance on State highways. Therefore, the position is subsidized partially by Cal Trans. The data is also used for the Traffic Control Devices Inventory (TCDI) Computer System. The requested position was included in the budget under Service Level 3. However, this level did not receive a high enough priority during the budget process, and therefore was not funded. Alternatives: 1. Approve a permanent position with a lower classification such as Maintenance Worker. 2. Continue to use CETA personnel for the installation and maintenance and traffic control signs. Funding Source: `t The position is funded through the general fund with reimbursement through recovery of damages of City property and reimbursement for sign maintenance on State Highways. a �1+`1 FGH:RRL:ek I c ' ' 1 -�� City of Huntington Beach P.O.BOX 711 CALIFORNIA 92640 c � CITY TREASURER—WARREN G.HALL i I I-IE140 TO: Floyd G. Belsito, Acting Public Worl:s Director MEMO FROH: t•Jarren G. hall, City Treasurer DATE: August 21 , 1979 SUBJECT: Traffic Control Sign Maintenance Because both Ivc,►, Gits hart and I deal with the liability problems of miss:.ng+,, bent. , loose, destroyed, defaced, r:tc . , signs within the City we are concerned that the maintenance program supervised by Traffic Engineering; be continued. For several years now it has been a CETA position. 1 do not wish to try to get into Public Works administration but to emphatically say that the continued (jay to day "on call " maintenance of our traffic control signs must continue and be performed by concerned persons, as the loss potential of one missing; sign is greatly in excess of a yearly salary for a sign maintenance person. Please consider this plea if there is any Intent to cut back or further reduce this service from its irtur,edlate past level it of operations due to reductions in Public, V.1orks Department levels{t of service . 1 i 1 � ! 4larren ;G. lttll � Treasttrer/Ri sk Manager t'GII/vt cc: Ralph Leyva t/ J A tm 'JfCreed b I-ai it at 11it, tuiv-ut the:il_ .1 2�1, V.1-,5 ac. c to w. If 111fifoli-stl (it (fit- curry.W4 act ido,tit thrve cith-i:1. ' ,1.15 been awar4"11, ;.-0 bnir ftivii.-k %%vro ;"I. 4.1;.l up i7 willmli 1:1 (11 ti;J1 off fill!-; lto.,J f-:1k;do Ow Tlil ii it!dwt tho car'b Covina %%I;-If 11 e r..r Ila,wil I cm%o ...1.1:11 Own, I, a %-I I.11ot 'elt's 1,41tinty. in (It-, thik .1:14 cro"I.c.1 I:-.1 if.m.4. f"IMA fill' V fit(tiv%er 7") it, '%mosoldeckion Ox itvd aaf.calrd • ot-vi'lent, %%h 1".1 LIIX 11.1'i might vn1:ehmfufJt,f- the %milh,: It id bo-11 %',I 111'r.Ill,-, twt.r. Irs ' %%.Ij Pcrltv ("ItItItY 11"t,"rist-1 Charles 1jr covi'la,who wx; Mclpard*% brain dAmip, Jvis af• fur not adv(ju:1tvj), mijil'.mg Ific road vu.JI;tv %%-Ill appeal, U tj I tz. f ��IcI I_11 ri 't-ho,�I;ffcrr.! p i by a (.%)UI ill!V, wn,- jell "I"Irr" he P-1-,1pi,rc r-, DW j a ';"C: cil Co..Ina R11; I 4xv i-A. viv.-vary oir; tho- AWL" (v r trial ll,foro J0,11-' It V !.,I C 1:,1.14. wI ti :!-'A vr. 11.0 rr a�I- 6 7-1 'r j .1..7 C., -:4 4. CITY OF HUMINGTON B5ACH INTER•DEPARTMENT COM MUNECATION I+I♦IPIJIH.PI V 11 , I To Michael Zambory From Ralph R. Leyva Director of Public Works Traffic Engineer I Subject Budget Date June 5, 1979 On January 13, 1979 the City Council established a list of Goals and Objectives after an all-day study session. One of the items which was added under the Public works Section reads as follows: "Emphasis shall be placed on direct field related traffic safety services. " C Since Goals and Objectives are then transferred into budget objectives which are measurable, it follows that Level 3 Pro- gram 416, Traffic Engineering Field Maintenance, should be placed above the anticipated cut: off priority ranking of 225. Otherwise, we are merely continuing the status quo and not really emphasizing this important function relative to other functions within the city. Ralph R./Leyva RRL:ek P. I i I CITY OF HUNTIVIGTON. PREACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Michael Zambory From Ralph R. Leyva Director of Public Works Traffic Engineer SuljjL.ct Account 416 - Vacant Pos:iton Date June B. 1979 Pursuant to our conversation in your office, we have assembled a history of the people who have worked on the sign truck during the last 8 years. Name Time Period Position Title & Status Jack Hall 1971-73 Maintenance Worker, Sr.-permanent Dennis Smith 1973-7.4 Maintenance Worker, Sr.-permanent Duane Wentworth 1974-3/75 Maintenance Worker -permanent Mike Browning 3/75-1976 Maintenance Worker -OETA . Mike Ary 1976-1/77 Maintenance Worker -CETA Ken Pike 1976-1/77 Maintenance Worker -CETA Tom Freeman 1/77-6/78 Maintenance Worker -CETA Brian Smith 6/78-10/78 Maintenance Vorker., f._ -CETA Wes Bell 10/78-Present Parking Enf Off. -CETA Exact dates of. employment are not available from Personnel Department at this time. Therefore, approximate dates were used in this memo. Please note that two people were assigned to the sign truck from 1976 to 1/77. Around March 1975, Duane Wentworth's position was on the verge of being reclassified to Maintenance Worker Senior. However, about the same time Jack Ball, who was an equipment operator left the city and Duane Wentworth was assigned Equipment Operator. The position assigned to the sign truck, which had been previously a Maintenance Worker Senior on Marc% 1975 became a M*tenance Worker-CETA. There- fore, a permanent position was filled by a CETA employee around March 1975 and has remained to the present. Since Wes Bell is scheduled to be terminated on June 30, 1979 and the new CETA program does- not.-provide the proper level of funding for this position, it is requested that the original permanent posi- tion of Maintenance Worker, Senior be re-instated in order to provide the required level of service for traffic safety. i Ralph Rr Leyva Traffid Engineer RRL:ek cc: Joe Peca I I i ;,•. nrcElvEn Efly of HOMErCOUNCIL � 'Jla.hc 0»w��AI.,I,rs!a.<<C.+rwl.�v C''or.i.i19•.- � P.O.BOX 1401, HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIF. 41647 lie I May 71 1979 i . i Mayor and City Council City of !Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, C.a. 92648 Dear Members of the City Council , In light of the recent California Supreme Court decision in the matter of the City of San Diego vs. various billboard companies, HOME Council Members believe the City of Huntington Beach should revive its activities to eliminate "billboards" pursuant to the existing 11B Ordinance Code . The Supreme Court found that it was a proper activity of a city to regulate and eliminate bill-- boards in the public interest. HOME Council members by their action of March 28, 1979; ash that the City Council direct the City Attorney to pro— ceed to enforce our city ordinance and eliminato a long stnnding visual problem in our community. Very truly yours, Tom biv 11go:7 HOME COUNCIL President cc: City attorney I - i � C� REQUEST FCvA CITY COUNCIL ACTION 79-59 t")ubmitted by Ruth Bailey Department City Council Legislative Committee Daze Prepared clay 27 , 1979 Backup Material Attached Yes No Subject Sil 462 (Dills) _ BILL BOARITS City Administrator's Comments o� Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: !� STATEi`M OF ISSUE: i SA 462 would prohibit cities from requiring the removal of billboards without payment of -,ompensation. j RECCMENDATION: Send letters of opposition to SB 462 to the proper legislators. t ANALYSIS: SB 462 would prohibit cities from requiring the removal of billboards without payment of compensation. The Consultant to the Assembly Committee on Local Government indicates that there has never been a bill passed by the Committee that would restrict local police power decision making and home rule as much as this bill does. This bill would not allow cities to cause the removal of billboards or other advertising displays through zoning amortization programs, as our ordinance does. This will result- in double payments to sign owners who first receive benefits in increased revenues due to the monopoly they enjoy during the amortization period. ,since no new signs can be erected ' .the value of the existing nonconforming signs is substantially increased. To require payment after this period has elapsed forces cities to further compensate owners for the increased value caused by the ordinance outlawing these signs. ALTERNATIVFS: Support or take no position on this bill. FIMING SOURCE: to funds are necessary. PIO WO r r 044 W CITY CF HUNTIINIGT©N BEAC D 0INTER•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MAI HUNTINGWW SIACH ',i ) I, J J. /S -`� * CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH v/ ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE ' To Floyd G. Belsito From Michael Zambory Subject Goldenwest and Palm Traffic Date May 15, 1979 i Signal One condition of approval for Tract No. 10067, 68,69 Seacliff Phase TV, was 50% participation in the cost of the traffic signal at Goldenwest and Palm. in addition, the signal was to be installed and operating prior to the generation of construction traffic. According to the Huntington Beach Company, an application for a Coastal Permit was submitted May 9, 1979. Assuming a realistic time schedule and allowing for the possibility of an appeal to the Coastal Commission' s decision, the following are estimated target dates for the project: 1. South Coast Regional Commission Hearing August, 1979 2. California Coastal Commission Hearing November, 1979 3. Final Decision January, 1980 4. Completion of final construction plans and March, 1980 issuance of building permits 5. Start .,�-nnstruction April-May, 1900 �1 According to this schedule, the traffic signal should be operating by April-May, 1980. Working back from a completion date, the following is an estimated schedule for the construction of the traffic signal: I 1. Completion of plan, specs and estimate October, 10, 1979 2. City Council approval to advertise bids October 20, 1979 3. Bid opening November 19, 1979 4. Award of contract December 1, 1979 5. Begin construction December 30, 1979 6. Completion (90 working days) April 27, 1980 If the City Council wishes to accelerate the schedule, an agreement would have to be reached with the Huntington Beach Company to reimburse the City for 50% of the cost of the traffic signal at such time that con- struction begins for Seacliff Phase IV. The City would have to fund the entire cost of the work from Special Gas Tax Funds and receive reimburse- ment for half of the cost about March, 1980. The following schedule is the most optimistic based on current estimates: 1. Completion of plans, specs and estimate June 20, 1979 2. City Council approval to advertise bids July 2, 1979 3. Bid opening August 8, 1979 4. Award of contract August 20, 1979 'S. Begin construction CAptember 4 , 1980 6. Completion (90 working dayAich�ael January 18, 1980 Z MZ:RRL:mc Director f ublic s .4 CITY OF IMIIJNTINGTON BEACH � f INTER-DEPARTMEilT COMMUNICATION 11uMnticto►a rEAcN To Jeri Chenelle From City Attorney For �airf Administrative Analyst Subject Posting of Business Directory Date March 9, 1979 at Main and PCH This memorandum responds to your request for an analysis of any legal problems which may be created by the city installing and maintaining a business directory at the corner of Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway. The city may legally install and maintain a business directory. There would appear to be direct benefit to the public in providing directional information as to businesses within the city, and may even benefit the city itself indirectly by increasing sales tax revenues received by the city from these businesses. Since this directory would be ity-owned and maintained, it would not fall within the purview of tl?4. sign ordinance, as the city is exempt from its own regulations. Insofar as the Coastal Commission is concerned, it would be desirable to review with the Coastal Commission whether or not they feel a per- mit would be required. If so, issuance of such a permit would seem to be a mere formality and could be handled on the consent calendar. In conclusion, these is no legal impediment to installing and ;maintain- ing a busine •"ireetory. J fiN O'CONNOIj� puty City- ttorney JO:bc APPROVED: 4-a/-�� j GAIL HUTTON, City Attorney '� VA All .JA ` City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box Ito CALIFORNIA 92648 I ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT June 14, 1976 �Y✓ Honorable Mayor. � and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Floyd G. Belsito Acting City Administrator Subject: Contract for Pedestrian Crossing Protection at Three Locations Dear Council Members: At three locations, as described below, early action for ' modification to pedestrian crossing protection devices to existing traffic signals is recommended for the preservation of life. 1. Flashing beacons at Springdale and Croupier. Estimate of cost is $3,550. 00. 2. Pedestrian signals at Edinger and west entrance. Estimate of cost is $3,650. 00. 3, Pedestrian signals at Pacific Coast Highway and Newland. 8 Estimate of cost is $1,100.00. According to Section 1211 of the City Charter, the City Council may authorize contracts or purchases without advertising for bids if the work or the purchase of materials or supplies are deemed by the City Council to be of urgent necessity for the preservation of life, health or property upon the affirma- tive vote of at least two-thirds of the total members of the City Council. The cost of the work can be performed at least as economically by this method as by the normal procedure of advertising. Three proposals will be received and award will be made by the Director of Public Works and the Purchasing Agent based on the low bid. The work will be financed with Gas Tax funds. The work can be performed by July 1, with this procedure, whereas normal advertis- ing procedure will result in about one months delay. Transmitted herewith is a resolution aufDri.zing the staff to proceed with the necessary material and services. It is recommended the City Council adopt the resolution. Very truly yours, V1.FiEEi:aeg Director of Public Works Trans. i I I r Huntington H,pach Planning Commission P.O. C?X 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 i TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission DATE: May 12, 1976 ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, Acting City Administrator RE: Code Amendment No. 73-31: "Rewrite of the Sign Ordinance" Transmitted herewith is proposed Code Amendment No. 73-31, generally referred to as a "Rewrite of Article 976 - the Sign Ordinance. " The proposed ordinance reflects; approximately two (2) years of research, analysis and discussion by the Planning Commission, Sign Committee, and Planning Staff. The Sign Committee was formed by the Commission in order to provide comprehensive and detailed participation in the revision process by the various sign user interests. This Committee included representatives from the Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce, the Huntington Beach/ Fountain Valley Board of Realtors, Home Council, and the Huntington Beach Company. The Committee met with the Planning Staff on all of the draft proposals and directly contributed to many of the provisions con- tained within the recommended ordinance. The Planning Commission at numerous study sessions discussed the pro- posal with.'both the Sign Committee representatives and the Planning Staff. Additionally, there were two separate public hearings held on A the matter. The latter hearing was necessitated as the result of con- cerns expressed by the Commission and Staff regarding simplification of the enforcement procedures of the ordinance. The Commission, because of the complexity of the proposed sign ordinance , � .• and the potential impacts on signing programs within the City, requests an opportunity to discuss the proposal with the City Council at a study session prior to the Ccuncil' s public hearing on the ordinance. A Planning Commission/City Council study session has been scheduled for May 25, 1976 and it is anticipated that this study item will be scheduled for discussion should the City Council concur on the request. The Council will also find attached the final comments and recommendations of the Sign Committee as they were presented at the Planning Commission public hearing on April 20, 1976. f Respectfully submitt d, c ar A. Iiarlow Secretary RAli:JMC:j a n V/ i"VNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIEM HUNTIN=M MACH CHAWR OT CURERCE APR H ING April 7. 1916 P. O. !bc 190 Iluntlr Eliesch CA 92540 Thq Huntington leech Chambst of COemMtee sign code coanittee wiahea to snit and conpitarnt tt,e planning staff on their understanding and cooperatlor. of our object- Ives In strueturins e'bst us believe to a good sign ordinance, out further few rseocsaandstions, so cads havoln, are mtnle.al and yet very trertsnt in our opinion f. to city scunomleas oN 1 I 1 1 Should include a reference to "promttng econorlco of pegs l) crxs'ereo" since slgning and its loglolavtive restrictions (by Ordinsn:e) affect business In the commaunity. , 4IScI14��c� ! r Htr oNl (27) Site (Alga ) As long as the meaning rniy applies directly to Integrst oil al,opping centers and/or such type of variable metivlty Laceinsas centers having a etivteonly sarmed upon marketing theme, the definition would be satisfactory to the Chamber of Cotaaores. However, If this datinitior. Includes the individual "mom" and "pop" business whereby there ca,ld be two or three, ate. of such type on a so-called "site", the Chaabor disagrees since the signing ((lsa- atanding, etc.) would mot be adequate enough for the lid vld aI business. iN1at is au osed good signing for rhu wh" . nttu try not neccosortly bo Cocd oi.-nlny for Ito IuJividi,n1 (not lntecrated market wive) activities. Ho,, rAny of the prestnt "mar" end "pop" type buslnoop412 ate on individual "situ" (one parcel)? A percentage -"n the srin cnmercial scrips In the City - would be helpful. SECTION 916016 Cl oI R aT YG 51e (b) yornit 100 sq. It. p.a. 3 (t) yOtalt 20 It high N ).602 Cl, (b) lign height i Area C4 ANn Is DISM1CTR (1) Ilan olRn height 20' not 10' and wax sign area T;IW �,U,11 100 sq. it not 60 sq. it (with 2 to I ratio not maim 1 to 1) (2) max slon height 23' not 20' and sex sign area 200 ■q. it not 130 eq. It (with 2 to I ratio not I to 1) (l) Max sign area 250 sq. it not 200 sq. It t2 to I ratio not i to 1) R M 1111.E CL C2. C), ! N U (poop N WS, VI 201 not 10% for proportionate eepy to baekgrouad area C2, Cl. C4 40% ant 20% for proportionate copy to background srw 1iatfyM 6o IL /jCHS (psga (A) for proportionate wall sign area to building, 2 to 1 ratio riot 1.3 to 1 N 9160 21 mil u (r•ee "Use of root signs. No portion or persons ohsti he permitted to utlilse a root milli unless approved to part o: a plef-esd also prearaml". TWIS C"IME ACAIN H1SMS TO RMHD OUR ArMCIATION TO TIa PUM11117 otvARt11t11r volt Tloltit CoonurmlE in ATTzwrtls; To RING A30W A tRmxu1it 11cN of mA11t-s. i I ti SUMMA " C F SIGN O'RDnQN= PKNiSioNs REsIDENPIAL DISTRICTS TYPE OF SIGI+S MAXIK24 AREA MAXD M HEIGHT RMAMS Rl, R2, R3, and R4 1. Freestanding 1 spare foot of 6 feet a. Monument signs mist be placed sign area per in a landscaped planter at dwelling unit up the entrance street to a l t the m 0 square feet entrance to a re, orsidential i j' conplex. i 2. Wall 1 square foot of The sign' letters a. Wall signs must be affixed to sign area per shall not exceed masoiry walls for the surface dwelling mit up more than eighteen of buildings. to a maxin urt of inches in height. 50 square feet. i i SUMMARY OF SIGN ORDINANCE PROVISIONS INDUSTRIAL CISTRIC':S TYPE OF SIGNS MAXIMUM AREA MAXIMUM HEIGHT REMARKS Ml-A, t' , and M2 (1) rr-iestanding 32 square feet 8 feet a. One monument sign shall be permitted per site. (2) Freestanding 50 square feet 10 feet b. One such sign per center. (Industrial t Center) I I 141-A, Ml, and M2 (3) Wall a. l so.ft. of May not project a. May project eighteen inches sign area `Zr above any portion into the required setback. each lineal of the roof. foot of build- ing frong. b. A maximm of 200 sq.ft. and a mi:sim= of 35 sq.ft. t i s p , h ti PAGE IUD i s DIAL DISTRICTS TYPE; OF SIaz MAXI" AREA MAYMUM HEIGHT RE;4UM ' C2, C3, and C4 6. Canopy a. Ve area c,f such May not project a sign when com- above any bind with all portion of the other signs behind roof. the setback, way not exceed 158 � of the building front. 1 C2, C3, C4 and 7. 11 . late 6 Square Feet May not project above any portion of the roof. I C2, C3, C4 and 8. Building 2% of the area Must be placed a. One building identification R5 Identification of the wall. to withi.-i the top sign per street frontage. which it is 25 feet of the attached. building, however, $ it cannot extend above the lowest portion of the roof. C� w i ri SUMM-ARY OF SIGN ORDINANCE PROVISIONS COi$M.RCIAL DISTRICTS TYPE OF SIGNS MAXIMUM AREA MAXYMQM HEIGHT REMARKS t Cl (1) Freestanding 60 Sq. ft. 10 ft. (a) One such sign per site. 1 (b) One (1) sq.ft. of sign area for each lineal foot of site fontage. j C2, C3, C4, and (2) Freestanding (a) 0'-12' setback 60 sq.ft. 10 ft. (a) One such sign per site. R5 (b) 13'-20' setback 150 sq.ft. 20 ft. (b) One (1) sq.ft. of sign area for (c) 211+ setback 200 sq.ft. 25 ft. each lineal foot of site frontage. Cl, C2, C3, C4. and (3) Projecting a sq. ft. Shall not project (a) one such sign shall be permitted R5 more than 4 ft. from for each activity. the structure or extend above the roof line. Cl, C2, C3, C4, and (4) ball (a) 1.5 sq.ft. May not project (a) May project eighteen inches into R5 sign area for above any the required setback. each lineal foot portion of the cf building front. roof. (b) Maximum 200 sq.ft. and a minimum of 35 sq.ft. C1 and R5 (5) Canopy (a) The area of such may not project a sign when com- above any bined with all portion of the other signs behind roof. the setback, way 4 not exceed 10% of the building `rOdt. i • - S +.S 4� � r 16121 Malaga Lane Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647 j March 18, 1975 Mayor's Office rLtf, ; City oer, 2000 Main Street}on Beach �tt�Nr'"srcar;a Civic Cent rt,CAIof Huntington Beach, California 92647 �+ Honorable Mayor and City Council: 19 18 j j r During the past three years, we the residents and property owners in the Huntington Villa Apartment area have conducted a vigorous campaign and, have submitted several petitions relating to the extremely hazardous traffic conditions at Beach Boulevard and Stark Street. Our efforts to obtain traffic signals at this intersection through the various state and municipal agencies have only resulted in unkept construction dates and broken promises. On November 18, 1974, we appeared before your body to plea for im- mediate action on the installation of these desperately needed signals. After Council discussion we were publicly informed that the traffic signals would be advertised for bid in January 1975 and construction would be started in February or March. We were also told to advise you if the above dates were not kept. Needless to say, those dates are rapidly passing and except for another grinding automobile crash, resulting in further damage to life and J property, nothing has changed. ' Recent conversations with the Public Works and City Administrative ' Departments offer at best, a construction start in June. This is right in the middle of the busiest summer beach traffic which seems to be deplorably poor planning. Ladies and gentlemen, we are tired of delays, snags, paperwork, red- tape, proaisev and talk. We need action and we need It now . ... this spring, before the heavy summer traffic jams : : t:. We, therefore request that this subject be placed on the agenda of the council meeting on 1p el, "I":, at which time we wculd like to address the Council. *4*0*ZZ 7 Sincerely yours, Emil Pesek, President Huntington Villa Apartment DYrners' fff Association. I EP/ap l �" Y 1� CITV OF HURL TINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HU4104G"61ACc11 Bill Hartge From Alicia M. Wentworth Director of Public Works City Clerk Subject Request for Traffic Signalixation Date March 18, 1975 For your information, we are atta_hing a letter from Mr. Emil Pesek, President of the Huntington Villa Apartment owners' Association, in which he has requested to appear on the April 7, 1975 Council Agenda. If you plan to submit a report for the Agenda, it should be in our office by April 2, 1975. I i __ � •:yam_.__ _-___--_ City of Huntington Beach r P.O. BOx 1W CALIFORNIA SUM OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK June 24, 1975 , r ' Department of Transportation State of California District 7, P.O. Box 2304 Los Angeles, CA 90051 Attentions R. G. Drosendahl Senior Transportation Engineer Traffic Branch Gentlemen: I , The Citf Council of the City of Ifuntington Beach at an adjourned iregular meeting held Monday, June 23, 1975, approved Supplemental f Agreement No. 3085 S1 between the City and State of California to include Stark Avenue in the Beach Boulea d traffic control. signal/ I system. J 1 We are enclosing an original and copy of said agreement, together with two copies of the Statement of City Council A^.tion. We would appreciate receiving a duly executed copy of same for our files. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMWscb enc. h I � r City of Huntington Beach I .O. BOx 190 CALIFORNIA 9264 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT June 23, 1975 1 ORIGINAL { Honorable Mayor Copy and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Supplemental Agreement No. 3085-01 with State to Include Stark in Beach Boulevard Project Dear Council Members: Transmitted herewith is a Si-.�:) iimental Agreement between the city of Huntington Beach and -a State of California to include Stark Street in the Beach Boulevard traffic control signal system. The original agreement involving twelve signals was previously executed by both parties. It is reconmended that the City Council approve the agree- ment and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same. Very truly yours, !r''.e H.J E.' Hartge � Director of Public Works HHH:ae Trans. I 1 i r 'V 1 r STATE OF CAEIFOINIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR•, Gor.rna. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION l DISTRICT 7. P.O. BOX 27D4, EOS ANGEIES 90051 J June 41 1975 ; t 1 �:. V E D 07-0La-39 0.0/5.8 Beach Boulevard - i c175 PCH to Rte. 405 F'wy. T-4208—A HUrmNaTCN f3ZACH. CrAUR. 07386 - 359401 Mr. H. E. Hartge Director of Public Works City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Hartge: Reference is Made to the proposed Supplemental Agreement to include Stark Street in the above-referenced project. In addit''on, it is necessary to replace the expression "TOPICS" with "FAUN to reflect changes in Federal funding. At are the original and five copies of City-State Supplemental Agreement No. 3085 (S-1) ., Please sign the original and first copy. When the ao,�reement is executed on behalf of the City, please return the original and first copy of the agreement and two certified copies of the resolution, minute order or other decree adopted by the City Council authorizing approval of the agreement. After execution by the State, one copy of the fully executed agreement will be returned for your files. Also at that time, we will request the return of your fully executed copy of Agreement No. 3085, dated July 2, 1973, which will be super- seded by the attached Supplemental Agreement. Very truly yours, R. G. DROSENDAHL Senior Transportation Engineer Traffic Branch :.HE:nn Attach. • I tt i t •'t ` 07-orn•32 0.0/517 07I00 - 309401 beach bled. frog Pacific Coast xwo to $nn Diego Fl• a soutwmw d Of! U* I ti. District Agrommut No. 3085(S-X) UJS dV"ZSMpptTAL lWAS1L UWt MADD ANO UMMD WO 7k 18 W1Y or , l! By AND x1rom }, CITY or !tvmvlflm UAC$, a body politic &M a Muaiaipal oorporatiaa cf the State of .. Callforaia, h nL after referred to as 9=6 , .' AND STATE OP CALTY01 1ho aatinq by and t1magb its 1 bualnras and Transportation 14gonoy, Dgwtmtt of Transportation, horainatter re f"red to as "STATSO i 1 ' i i i WURYEAS# BYATE aA.'k CITY oonteMPlats installations of central signal coppator in that City of Huntington saaah and sodifioatlon of traffic control signal system and safety lighting s': the luterseations of Pacific Coast highway, Atlantic Avernus, Ibdianapolis Avenuer Adams Avenue, Yorktown Avenue, GarVeld Avenue* Main >Btraat-Ellis Asspaa, Talbert Avenne, $later Awnw, Warner Avenue, hell Avenno, S"rk I Street, sdiagwr Awswe-Ban Diego ft*way soutWOM4 Off-roMp vith state Sighray ftute If (Roach soulewrd) asd roadvwk for southboazod beach boulevard at x4ieger Avenue to sea Dino is ray southbowW off-rs�p, all of which is situated with the City of ■untington Beacb, and desire to spwify boririw i the tarn swd cowditien under which said meter, system 4 aad roadw k ads to be installed, mdifiod, financed aad saint-goods XWO TdbBlh!lC1N't is oonsidenratiea of the covenants � and conditions herein amtainod, the parties hereto agrees a• >Eolla+es t i { UCTION I i CITY AtiuEB t (1) ft install thew central owputor, modify the traffic control signal system and safety lighting and # �I I ti S ' aoastruat the roadwork bereinbefore want:ionad, through coastruCtIOA by contracts with construction coutractors licensed by the drat& of California, said vont:racto to be carried out In aacordaaae with taws governing ".1TY witxi refersnos to the adarrct er of the work to be done tther&rmdarg and to be vo Wleted In omforaity with plena and speoifioa- tions Of city or sTATSO and to the satinfarcttiar of and subjest to the appxw ml of dTMMO (f) to bear CITY'a share of design engineering cost&, oonstruotion engineering oasts a and construction coe is required l to eoeplete the installation and modification s+alsrred to !ararisimp such share to be a am bearing the saw proportion to the total poet of installation of the ventral ooMputer and n diiioatbo of the traffic watrol signal syston and safety lighting as tiro Mudoor of legs of htgfwrays uadsr jurisdiction of MIT at the interseatioas iavolved bears to ttw total number of logs of hLgbways at suoh. iaterseat.1c nn• (I) To reimburse ATATa for Ct' 1 d puopottimat a shag of the oostt of aaintananse and operation of said ooapvUr and traffics ward signal system cad safety lighting, such shares to be detesalnod in the manner provided in that Agremnat for > ixtenauoe of state highways rrit• x the CITY wblch is in w�w J 1 affect at the time said costs are incurrad, or if no such Agreement exists, much share to be a sumo bearing the same proportion to the total ooat of maintenance and operation of said oompmter and traffic ooatrol signal system ana safety lighting cut the number of logs of highways andrr jurisdiation of the CItY beara to the total number of logs of blowayw at such intersoations, (4) To apply for necessary enaroase4matc peariti, for work Wit'" the state highway right of Way, in aoe�oxrG�roet With STATses standard permit procedures, ts�1C'lIOM tt (1) To pay to CITY► px=mptly von rondItlon of a ststs t therefor, STA22"s sham of the design sagIneeriag costs, aoastraslior angias•ting oasts, and ovastrastimw► scats tmrquised to oosplsto the Lustallatimrn and modi.fioatim sr ferred to horsing, avc4 share to be a swm boarinq the seem Praportioa to the total cost of installation of the oestral owwvtor and mudifiostion of the tmraffLa control signal systN and safety lighting as the number of logs of highways um%r juriadiorioa of STATs at the intersections involved boars to the total number of logo of highways at such Intersections and all costs for caastruction oi., roadwork for scuthbound Reach 0oulevard at Edinger Avenue to Ban Diego Frowsy southbound off-grow* It it estimated that STA1'E'S share of the installa- tion and wodifiQation is $1601,000. The actual &=ant of STATE'1t share will be determined after the installation and modification are vorpleted, but in no ewnt shall STATS's share exceed $10,000 unless oth*zviso pr*vided in a aWw"mot ant between CITY cad STATE. ! (2) to mdataim and operate the central aampatir and the entire traffia ventral signal system and safety lighting } i rs is<stalied. ( SAClI061 III j It in mutwlly Understood and agre"I � (1) That obligations of STASS under terms of this A+lrenwat are arbjeat to the allocation of fins by the Califor U U19k gay Conmiesion. (2) that aei;!rsr STATs nor any officer or etplayse thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability oeorarriog by swum c,: anything done or omitted to be dooa by CM rnes oa in aoamsvtion with asky work, authority or -5- I f jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreernsak. It is also understood and agreed that# pursuant to Government Code 8sation 895.4 CITY shall fully indeeanify and hold STATE harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Go rament �Ade 3eotion 810.8) occurring by reason of anything d me or omitted to be dons by CITY under or in connaation with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. (3) That asithav CITY not any officer or &W1 yes l tb*X"f# is responsible for any damage or liability oovurring by reason of anything dons or omitted to be dons by SI'A S ' under or in oaahwitAon with any work* authority at j rrisd,iat1= rat delegated to CITY wrAtir this Agreemrut. It is slro WWOV- stood wad ap4od thatr purnwnt to Onvermwat Code Section 995.4, STATE sball fully f*learify and hold CITY harmless from any liability od for injury (as defined by Govetnamt Code Section 410.4) ocaurri,aq by reasons of anytUag dose ON mitt" I � to be done by STATE under or In ocawecticrn with any %v*� I authority or jurisdiction not delegated to CITY mine this Agressrrt�t. (4) That should any portion of the projeart be j finanosd with Federal Funds or State 0" Tax reeds all f I i applicable proca:iures and policies relating to Lie use of such funds shall apply notwithstanCing othar provisions of this Agreomaent. (3) That, if at any time it is determined that any � portion of the total eligible project costs &La to be financed fries rAU Funds&. the BTATEIS share will bo based on Uis suet of � 1 participating items remaining after the FAU funds haw beam �. deducted. � I That, Uxtriat Agreement Foe 3085, dated July 3, 1973, is hsrehy supers"ed and rep' mood. IM IFXTM M I HIMOPO, the parties hereto have 0aueed 'I We Ap*mmt to be executed by their respective officers, � dnlr "t*mLsod, the prawioions of which Agreemnt are effee- Uve as of t!m day, math and year first hereinabove writtem. MTAWN dt CALIFOXVIA CITY Or RMINtI''1'W M1 ACK Depas�tasnt of Transportation cle— ` ra�c/l. u � o• Dtrraftr of Wwwportation City Clerk r MMUILET E r' APPROVED AS TO FORM: DON P. HONFA $ttorr:©y j C Y ' -7• Dopaty City Attornoy, '