The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSpecial Sign Permit 90-1 Appeal to PC denial-Overruled PC CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK July 9, 1990 Arun Phadnis Watt Commerical Properties, Inc. 2716 Ocean Park Boulevard P. O. Box 2114 Santa Monica, CA 90406 Dear Mr. Phadnis: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held June 18, 1990, granted your appeal with findings and conditions relative to Special Sign Permit No. 90-1. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call our office at 536-5227. Sincerely yours, Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:me Enclosure: 6/18/90 Minutes CC: City Administrator City Attorney Community Development Director 1051K Telephone:714-536-5227) Page 15 - Council/Agency Minutes - 6/18/90 A motion was made by Winchell , seconded by Erskine, to adopt Resolution No. 6160. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: .. AYES: MacAllister, Winchell , Green, Mays, Erskine NOES: None ABSTAIN: Bannister ABSENT: Silva (City Council) PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED - APPEAL APPROVED WITH FINDINGS & CONDITIONS - WATT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 90-1 - OVERRULED (420.35) The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing on which decision had been continued from June 4, 1990 to consider the following: APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission' s denial of Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Watt Commercial Development Corporation LOCATION: Shopping center at the southwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Sher Lane ZONE: . C2-FP2 (Community Business District-Floodplain) REQUEST: To permit the construction of a freestanding sign that exceeds the Code permitted maximum height (29 feet in lieu of 7 feet) , maximum area (250 square feet in lieu of 30 square feet) and does not comply. with the minimum distance required between other freestanding signs on the site (approximately 60 feet in lieu of 200 feet) . The Community Development Director presented the staff report. The City Attorney stated there appeared to be technical defects in the origi- nal permit application because of the failure to get the landowner' s signature on the permit application and stated that Council had the right to have a revocation hearing and require removal of the sign. The Mayor declared the public hearing reopened. Ron Phadnis, applicant, stated he had read the legal opinion of the City Attorney and he urged Council to consider the sign as it stands with Sav-On going above the Kids-R-Us sign. He explained his proposal by using the wall renderings. Discussion was held between Mr. Phadnis and Council regarding alternative solutions. He gave a copy of an alternative solution to the Community Development Director. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Erskine, to grant the appeal and overturn the Planning Commission action on Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 as modified by staff with the following findings and conditions of approval : Page 16 - Council/Agency Minutes - 6/18/90 Findings for Approval : 1 . Strict compliance with Section 9610.5 will result in a substantial hard- ship to the applicant. The depth of the lot permits more "major tenants" than would usually be located on a parcel with a frontage of 855 feet. Permitting only four secondary tenant signs does not provide adequate exposure to those "major tenants" located at the rear of the subject pro- perty; therefore, additional signage is required. 2. The sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area. The sign is to be located where an existing 25 foot high pole sign is located. No additional negative impacts are anticipated. 3. The sign .will not be detrimental to properties located in the vicinity. The sign is located approximately 230 feet from the nearest adjacent pro- perty on the south side of Edinger Avenue. No additional negative impacts are anticipated from the construction of the subject sign. 4. The sign will not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and will not be a hazardous distraction. Conditions of Approval : 1 . The site plans and elevations received and dated February 8, 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The sign shall have a maximum height of 25 feet. The tenant panel configuration shall be modified to include four tenant panels with a maximum area of 180 square feet as shown on Attachment No. 5 in the Planning Commission staff report dated April 17, 1990. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. Submit copy of the revised elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. b. The property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that if the public right-of-way is . expanded, the property owner shall be responsible for the cost of reconstruction, relocation, and/or demolition of the subject sign. C. The existing Winchells sign shall be modified to have a maximum height of 8 feet. and to eliminate the "Edinger Plaza" panel (see Attachment No. 6 in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 17, 1990) . . 3. The applicant may submit plans for a center identification sign to be located at the main entrance to the retail center for approval . Said sign shall be subject to Design Review Board approval . 4. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs r Page 17 - Council/Agency Minutes - 6/18/90 .5, Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval , or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell , Green, Mays, Bannister, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: Silva (Cityuncil PUBLIC HEARIN CONTINUED TO 7/2/ 0 - APPEAL FILED BY SOUTHRIDOE HOMES TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 8 - 6 HIM SPECIAL PERMITS/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT N 90-6 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP RO. 89-456 (420.40) The Mayor sta ed the Public hearing to consider Conditional Use Permit No. 89-66 with Spec al Permits/Coastal Development Permit No. 90-6 and Tentative ' Parcel Map No. 8 456 would be continued to July 2•, 1990. (Cityn it OPEN BLIC HEARING - CONTINUED OPEN T /2 / - TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE - ORDINANC"0_3048 - RESOLUTION NO. 6164 (420.20) The Mayor announced that his was the day and hour set for a public hearing for the purpose of adoptin a traffic impact fee ordinance on new develop- ments. The purpose of the f is _part of an overall strategy to develop new sources of revenue for specific ublic improvements. Legal notice as provided to the ity Clerk's Office by staff had been pub- lished, and posted. No communicat ns or written protests were received on the matter. The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 3048 for Council adoption - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE HUNTINGTON BEAC MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH A TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE." The City Clerk .. presented Resolution No. 6164 for Council adoption - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF H TINGTON BEACH TO SET THE AMOUNT OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE AS AUTHORIZED BY OR NANCE NO. 3048." The Mayor declared the public hearing open. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Bannister, o continue the open public hearing on Ordinance No. 3048 and Resoluti No. 6164 to June'25, 1990. The motion carried by the following roll call ote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell , Green, Mays, Bannister, Erskine NOES: None ABSENT: Silva Page 18 - Council/Agency Minutes - 6/18/90 (City Council) OPEN PUBLIC HEARING - CONTINUED OPEN TO 7/16/90 - APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 89-5 - HUNTINGTON HAMR MALL - NW CORNER OF WARNER AVENUE & ALGONQUIN STREET (420.35) The ayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consi er the appeal : APP I A ION NUMBER: Special Sign Permit No. 89-5 APPLI AN APPELLANT: D. D. Dunlap Companies Inc. LOCATION: N thwest corner of Warner Avenue and Algonquin Street. ZONE: R3 (Me 'um High Density Residential ) RE UEST: The a licant proposes to modify an existing off.-site sign for Huntington Harbour all . The proposed sign would have a maximum height of 16 feet and an area o 134 square feet including 3 tenant panels, one of which is proposed to be change le copy. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: C egorically exempt pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3, of the California Envir mental Quality Act. Legal notice as provided to City Clerk' s Office by staff had been mailed, published, and posted. No commu ications or written protests were received on the matter. The Mayor declared the public hearing pen. A motion was made by MacAllister, secon d by Bannister, to continue the open public hearing regarding Special Sign Per 't No. 89-5 to July 16, 1990. The motion carried by the following roll call vo : AYES: MacAllister, Winchell , Green, Mays, B nister, Erskine . NOES: None ABSENT: Silva (CityCouncil) OPEN PUBLIC HEARIN - CONTINUED T 6/2 / 0 - MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 DEN E T/ELL AREA (350.40) The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set fNhadbeen ic hearing to consider the formation of a Community Facilities DistD) under the authority of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act oollowing the submission of a petition from property owners in the areCFD would be the levying of a special property tax for financing t 'ng of Ellis Avenue from Edwards to Goldenwest, financing of otheri rovements, financing the acquisition of land along Ellis Avenue fori t-of-way and limited funding for police and fire protection servic Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk' s Office by sbeen ma led, published, and posted. No communications or written protests were received on the matter. g90 . 3S REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION June 4, 1990 Date Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted to: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator �d(� Submitted by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Developmentl Prepared by: w =' APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN` C Subject: PERMIT NO. 90-1 Cm yam a P".�' Ln Ln n Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception co' n c ^ Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE• Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Watt Commercial Properties, Inc. to the Planning Commission' s denial of Special Sign Permit No. 90-1, a request to construct a freestanding sign in excess of the maximum allowed height and with square footage greater than permitted for the retail center near the southwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Sher Lane. RECOMMENDATION Motion to "Uphold the Planning Commission' s action and deny the appeal of Special Sign Permit No. 90-1. " Planning Commission Action taken on May 1. 1990 : A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY WILLIAMS, TO DENY SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 90-1 WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Mountford (Out of Room) ABSTAIN: None Findings for Denial : 1. Strict compliance with section 9610 . 5 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code does not present a substantial hardship to the applicant. Adequate signage can be provided for the major tenants in full compliance with the Code. 2 . The proposed sign may adversely affect other signs in the area. 3 . The proposed sign with a height of 29 feet and an area of 250 square feet may be a hazardous distraction to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. . 3 Q PIO 5/85 J . ALTERNATIVE TO RECOMMENDATION: 1. Motion to "Approve the appeal and overturn the Planning Commission action on Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 as modified by staff with findings and conditions of approval . " 2 . Motion to "Approve the appeal and overturn the Planning Commission action on Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 as requested by the applicant with findings and conditions of approval . " 3 . Motion to "Continue to the meeting of in order for staff to work with the applicant on additional alternatives . " ANALYSIS• The applicant proposes to replace an existing 25 foot tall, 200 square foot, 2 tenant panel, freestanding sign with a 29 foot high, 250 square foot, pylon sign including 4 major tenant panels, 4 smaller minor tenant panels (8 total) and a center identification sign. The subject property is over 600 feet deep which allows more anchor tenants than would typically be located on a parcel with 885 feet of frontage. Therefore, staff and the Design Review Board recognize that additional signage from what is permitted by Code is desired to provide exposure for the major tenants located to the rear of the property. Minor tenants are not permitted by Code to have freestanding signage. The Code does permit, however, a tenant directory which may have a maximum height of 7' and a maximum area of 30 square feet. Further, the directory must be oriented to pedestrian and vehicular traffic on site (not to the traffic on Edinger Avenue) and be setback a minimum of 30 feet from the exterior property line. Redevelopment Status : The subject center is located within the Huntington Center Redevelopment Project Area. The Redevelopment Agency is currently proceeding with a precise plan of street alignment study which may ultimately result in the right-of-way being expanded. The Agency has commented that, if the sign construction cannot be deferred until after the study, that the applicant submit a letter of agreement stating that they are aware that the sign may require relocation at a later date and that they will be responsible for the cost of reconstruction, relocation or demolition of the proposed sign. Environmental Status: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15311, Class 11, of the California Environmental Quality Act . RCA 6-4-90 -2- (5865d) Design Review Board Status : On May 11, 1989, the Design Review Board approved Planned Sign Program No. 88-4 for the wall signs at the subject retail center. The conditions of approval included the requirement that the Winchells sign be modified to eliminate the "Edinger Plaza" panel and to have a maximum height of 8 feet and that a center identification sign be provided at the main entrance. The applicant was informed that the proposed 25 foot high double pole sign (the applicant now proposes the sign to be 29 feet tall) would require the granting of a special sign permit by the Planning Commission. The Design Review Board did, however, vote to recommend approval of the proposed 25 foot high sign to the Planning Commission. Staff believes that a 29 foot tall sign as requested by the applicant is not appropriate for the site. Instead, staff feels that the sign should remain - at 25 feet in height, and have a maximum of four major tenant panels, and a maximum area of 180 square feet. An illustration of the staff recommendation is included as a part of the attached Planning Commission staff report . FUNDING SOURCE: Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map 2 . Reduced elevation of applicants request. 3 . Draft Planning Commission minutes dated May 1, 1990 . 4 . Planning Commission staff report dated May 1, 1990 (includes illustration of staff recommendation) 5 . Applicant ' s Letter of appeal dated May 7 & 11, 1990 . 6 . Alternative No. 1 findings and conditions of approval 7. Alternative No. 2 findings and conditions of approval MTU:MA:TR:kjl RCA 6-4-90 -3- (5865d) LANNING SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 23-5-11 '3-LE . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHA& ORANGE, COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAP USE OF PROPERTY N-IAP EDINGER AVE -J L � ' >j AL.I.C. AVE. .-UES-!LS DP I 11LIA DR AVE. STONEW,C::) DR . T 17 .'jRY R. Am.zcI 1 CF-R .1 CF-C EE[= c.lD cR � R.ONE LN STARL113ti-- Cr, ----------------- CF-E NITA LN. VALEN71NE DR -j' GLENCOE AVE :b ANCY Z sL;NLIGHT DP C, —lH ------ 11 ALHAMBRA DR. F Ell cl L Fm Rw II I I I I I I I I I I I c.,. ANlI.E DR no �j b TY SEINE oft CIR-AlY DVA1,H MADDOX OR J e 'IRTV-ER m DON Cy z CF-E e DEALER K v!E w s c f I RHINE rgou. Da. o' U- DR L. A CR EDIF CF-R ------------ ""SR M. In Q C.F.C.D. O. C. F. C D c6-I L,j z ..... w 0 �® x ELI c. C) WARNER AVE � e nfi + JL • ail-d N Ci 5;0 r?a,�lj-0�S Fi�ursrl C�%vm.x� ��•, ;;-L-=;r.+i,� T® M^Taf r-RhzFr_4.92sn V �nD � NvT.f REX r•G,O• 49y ID=O' i \� To mn TclF PR�az1E 58yoW �M�T n 17-0' I r"Lf M a Lo�✓r�C rA�'S i sa_Es &�eFVIeF� •� . Co M C 1 H e-0 C E"'T EFL• IDeHTTPfc^TIo " T rIHAN DI FLI3G OFZ7' * olvlounu. 1 �wMl .: T T 2 Y L NnTiO s N T ��T TaN�vlT Su D D10.P—G'(OR`� SI6iN T6N/.N T r'nH els Tew►uT TwaNT. P/NI TE,e..cr srry tiea �exi nJ W/ FtvNM Uli.s *22^s LOTTOCC. a=o" snly ov.TsTro Plr�icH. . W/ IMICEI LETTP-" '- y_p" ��f��1�'�t�n1'1��y•. HE�.vpTl cr. srYl-B • a'_�'• �VLl11VVL7� D ° n 10-0 "0 I f e 211•cll f tI 7Y z4d""dalp" 3•�' _ to=o" x.&.s a,,d .C•. wor :/D DRAFT B-2 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 90-1 (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 17 , 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: WATT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOCATION: Southwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Sher Lane Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 is a request to construct a freestanding sign which exceeds the maximum height and area permitted by the Sign Code. Additionally, the sign is proposed to be located approximately 60 feet from an existing freestanding sign in lieu of the Code required minimum separation of 200 feet . On April 17, 1990, the Planning Commission continued Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 so that staff could present additional information regarding the existing signage at the center . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 as modified by staff with findings and conditions of approval . THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Ron Phadnis, Watt Commercial Development, gave a brief history of the shopping center and reiterated the reasons for his original request for a freestanding sign. He said the alternative recommendation for maximum height of 25 feet with a reduced sign area does not satisfy the expressed desire of his tenants to have their businesses included on the sign. George Arnold, Third and Walnut, spoke in opposition to the request . He feels there is too much sign clutter at the existing center which interferes with the required landscaping . THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Williams stated that he visited the site and, although the center is situated on a very deep lot, there did not appear to be any special land-related circumstances . A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY WILLIAMS, TO DENY SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 90-1 WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Mountford (Out of Room) ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED DRAr i PC Minutes - 5/l/90 -3- (5752d) FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . Strict compliance with Section 9610 . 5 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code does not present a substantial hardship to the applicant . Adequate signage can be provided for the major tenants in full compliance with the Code. 2 . The proposed sign may adversely affect other signs in the area . 3 . The proposed sign with a height of 29 feet and an area of 250 square feet may be a hazardous distraction to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. B CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90- /PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM PPLICANT: ROGER MILLER HONDA L TION: 19232 Beach Boulevard The Planni Commission, on April 3 , 1990, continued item for 30 days so t t a more complete Planned Sign Progra uld be submitted, an o allow Roger Miller Honda to de, rate compliance with existing c e requirements regarding flags-' banners . During the past th (30) days, various f banners, and temporary signs have en removed from t operty. However, on Sunday, April 22, 1990, taff observed orary flags attached to display automobiles . No plications a been filed to display such flags and banners . Roger Miller Honda has submit a ditional scaled drawings of the existing signs on site, and . i uesting a modification to the originally requested Planne gn ogram. The 45 square foot, internally illuminated wa ign id ifying "Honda" will be removed, rather than re The 44 . square foot, non-illuminated, foam er wall sign entifying "Roger Miller Huntington Beach Hon and the street a ess will remain, rather than be removed change is still con tent with the provisions of the tington Beach Ordinance de, which allow a maximum 121 squ foot wall sign for this sit The remainin roposed signage is the same as that resented on April 3 , 19 including a 25 foot high, 112 . 98 squ foot readerboa sign, and a 5 foot high, 13 square foot m ument sign which i ifies the service entrance. STAF COMMENDATION: O ril 25, 1990, staff received a letter from Roger Miller da uesting a continuance of the request to June 5, 1990, so tha ey could prepare their planned sign program, and waiving their andatory processing date. PC Minutes - 5/l/90 -4-. (5752d) huntington beach department of community development sraFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: May 1, 1990 SUBJECT: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 90-1 (CONTINUED _ FROM APRIL 17, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: Watt Commercial DATE ACCEPTED: Development Corp. March 27, 1990 2716 Ocean Park Blvd. #1007 Santa Monica, CA 90405 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: May 26, 1990 PROPERTY Huntington Beach No. 1, OWNER: A California Limited ZONE: C2-FP2 (General Partnership Commercial-Floodplain) 2716 Ocean Park Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90505 GENERAL PLAN: General Commercial REOUEST: To permit the construction of a freestanding sign that EXISTING USE: Retail exceeds the Code permitted Center maximum height (29 ft . in lieu of 7 ft . ) , maximum LOCATION: Southwest corner area (230 sq. ft . in lieu of of Edinger Avenue and Sher 30 sq. ft . ) and does not Lane comply with the. minimum distance required between ACREAGE: 13 . 56 acres other freestanding signs on the site (approximately 60 ft . in lieu of 200 ft . ) . 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 as modified by staff with findings and conditions of approval . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 is a request to construct a freestanding . sign which exceeds the maximum height and area permitted by the Sign Code. Additionally, the sign is proposed to be located approximately 60 feet from an existing freestanding sign in lieu of the Code required minimum separation of 200 feet . On April 17, 1990, the Planning Commission continued Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 so that staff could present additional information regarding- the existing signage at the center. A-FM-23C 3 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The following is a zoning conformance matrix which compares the existing freestanding signage for the center to the development standards contained within Article 961 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Distance from Sign Area Height Other Signs Existing/Permitted Existing/Permitted Existing/Permitted Denny' s 24 sq. ft ./30 sq. ft . 7 ' 6"* / 7 ' 410 ft ./200 ft . min. Weiner- 51 sq. ft* ./30 sq. ft . 81301* / 7 ' 110 ft . */200 ft . min. schnitzel Winchells 69 sq. ft . **/30sq. ft . 23 ' 6"**/ 7 ' 60 ft . * / 200 ft . min. Phil & 200 sq. ft . */30sq. ft . 25 ' * / 7 ' 60 & 110 ft . */200ft .min. Jims*** * Legal/nonconforming ** Legal/nonconforming - staff recommendation requires that the sign be modified to a maximum height of 8 feet . *** To be replaced with proposed pylon sign. The retail center currently has four freestanding signs located adjacent to Edinger Avenue. As can be seen in the matrix above, each is legal-nonconforming as the height, area, and/or required distance between other freestanding signs . The Denny' s sign is 6" above the maximum height of 7 ' permitted by Code. The Weinerschnitzel sign is 1 ' 3" above the 7 ' maximum height limit and 21 square feet over the maximum permitted area of 30 square feet . The Winchell ' s sign is 16 ' 6" above the maximum height of 7 ' permitted by Code and 39 square feet over the maximum area of 30 square feet . The Design Review Board/staff recommendation includes that this sign be modified to have a maximum height of 8 feet and that its area be reduced proportionately. Finally, the existing Phil & Jims/Kids R Us sign is to be replaced by the proposed four tenant pylon sign. The wall signs for the center comply with existing Code requirements and are addressed in Planned Sign Program No 88-4 approved by the Design Review Board on May 11, 1989 . Briefly, the Code permits 1. 5 square feet of wall sign per lineal foot of leasehold width, maximum 200 square feet. A copy of approved Plan Sign Program No. 88-4 is attached to this report for reference. Staff Report - 5/l/90 -2- (5599d) At the last meeting, several of the minor tenants within the center expressed their desire to have signage on the proposed pylon sign. Since the last meeting, the applicant has modified their proposal to include four additional (4) smaller tenant panels (eight (8) tenant panels total) on the pylon sign and to incorporate a center identification sign into the sign' s base. Minor tenants are not permitted by Code to have freestanding signage. The Code does permit, however, a tenant directory which may have a maximum height of 7 ' and a maximum area of 30 square feet . Further, the directory must be oriented to pedestrian and vehicular traffic on site (not to the traffic on Edinger Avenue) and be setback a minimum of 30 feet from the exterior property line. 4 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 as modified by staff with the findings and conditions of approval contained within the attached April 17, 1990 Planning Commission staff report . 5 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: A. The Planning Commission may deny Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 with findings; or B. The Planning Commission may approve Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 as proposed by the applicant . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Planned Sign Program No. 88-4 2 . Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 17, 1990 3 . Reduced elevations and site plan of existing freestanding signs . 4 . Reduced elevation of proposed eight (8) tenant panel pylon sign. 5 . Staff recommendation for the proposed sign HS:TR: jr Staff Report - 5/l/90 -3- (5599d) City f Huntington Beach - y o ng 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 July 12, 1989 Mr. Ron Phadnis Watt Commercial Development Corp. 716 Ocean Park Boulevard #1007 Santa Monica, California 90405 SUBJECT: PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM NO. 88-4 Dear Mr. Phadnis: The Planned Sign Program No. 88-4 for the center at the southwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Sher Lane, Huntington Beach, has been reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development. It shall serve as the document for design and installation of all signs. Unless otherwise specified and authorized herein, the City of Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, Article 961 entitled "signs" will fully apply. General Requirements Prior to installation of any sign a detailed drawing shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach for review and approval. Any drawing submitted to the City must be approved by the landlord. Two (2) copies of detailed drawings indicating the location, size, layout, design, materials and color of the proposed sign, including all lettering and graphics with sufficient architectural drawings depicting the exact relationship with the stores design shall be submitted. MAJOR TENANT WALL SIGNS Major tenants are Osco Drugs, Phil.& Jim's, Kids R Us and Michaels. Proposals for the major tenant wall signs will be evaluated separately by the staff, taking in consideration_ compliance with the sign code, approved colors and integration to the design of other wail signs approved by this Planned Sign Program for the rest of the in—line shops. Discrepancies between staff and the developer will be resolved by the Design Review Board (a formal application will be required). WALL SIGNS SIGNAGE to consist of pan—channel lighted letters attached to building, letter height to be no more than 24 inches and not lees than 18 inches. A44=Jvvien44 (1) All Channel letters are to be fabricated 22 GA. sheet metal with welded seams - filled and buffed prior to painting. Fabricated full welded aluminum letters will be permitted providing they adhere to specifications as outlined for metal channel letters. Channelume, Channel Classic and LET—R—edge type letters will not be permitted due to raped deterioration factor — (NO EXCEPTIONS). (2) Letter faces shall be minimum 1/8" thick, flat surface colored Plexiglas as manufactured by. Rohm & Haas. Painted Plexiglas will not be permitted. Approved Colors (choice of one per tenant): (1) GREEN #5060 (2) ORANGE #2119 (3) DK BLUE #2051 (4) RED #2283 (5) YELLOW #2037 (3) A. Retainer trim cap shall be 3/4" Black Jewelite brand trim cap edge. Retaining screws shall be #7 x #3/8" Phillips type sheet metal screws. All trim cap retaining screws must be painted Gold to match trim cap color. B. 5" deep letter returns shall be painted minimum of two coats of acrylic enamel medium bronze. Two (2) line signs are permitted with an overall height not to exceed 30 inches. Any changes, alterations or revisions to Planned Sign Program No. 88-4 shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development. This Planned Sign Program is subject to change pursuant to subsequent amendments to the sign code (Article 961) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code or based upon any future remodeling of the buildings or change in use. Please find attached a copy of the Design Review Boards action. Be aware that no monument or freestanding sings have been approved under this Planned Sign Program. If you have any questions regarding this matter, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely. 4partinen Checker SM:ss Attachment: 1. Design Review Board Minutes of 5/11/89 (3028d) huntington beach department of community development STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: April 17, 1990 SUBJECT: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 90-1 APPLICANT: Watt Commercial DATE ACCEPTED: Development Corp. March 27, 1990 2716 Ocean Park Blvd. #1007 Santa Monica, CA 90405 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: May 26, 1990 PROPERTY Huntington Beach No . 1, OWNER: A California Limited ZONE: C2-FP2 (General Partnership Commercial-Floodplain) 2716 Ocean Park Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90505 GENERAL PLAN: General Commercial REQUEST: To permit the construction of a freestanding sign that EXISTING USE: Retail exceeds the Code permitted Center maximum height (29 ft. in lieu of 7 ft . ) , maximum LOCATION: Southwest corner area (230 sq. ft . in lieu of of Edinger Avenue and Sher 30 sq. ft . ) and does not Lane comply with the minimum distance required between ACREAGE: 13 . 56 acres other freestanding signs on the site (approximately 60 ft . in lieu of 200 ft . ) . 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 as modified by staff with findings and conditions of approval . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 is a request to construct a freestanding sign which exceeds the maximum height and area permitted by the Sign Code. Additionally, the sign is proposed to be located approximately 60 feet from an existing freestanding sign in lieu of the Code required minimum separation of 200 feet . A-FM-23C AT Ac,H Mt N i#t Z 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONE: C2-FP2 (Community Business District- Floodplain) LAND USE: Retail center North and East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONE: C2-FP2 (Community Business District Floodplain) LAND USE: Retail center South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium High Density Residential ZONE: R3-FP2 (Medium High Density Residential) LAND USE: Multi-family dwellings West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONE: C4-FP2 (Highway Commercial-Floodplain) LAND USE: Retail 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STA-US: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15311, Class 11, of the California Environmental Quality Act . 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: The subject center is located within the Huntington Center Redevelopment Project Area . The Redevelopment Agency is currently proceeding with a precise plan of street alignment study which may ultimately result in the right-of-way being expanded. The Agency has commented that, if the sign construction cannot be deferred until after the study, that the applicant submit a letter of agreement stating that they are aware that the sign may require relocation at a later date and that they will be responsible for the cost of reconstruction, relocation or demolition of the proposed sign. 7 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. Staff Report - 4/17/90 -2 (5414d) 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The applicant proposes to replace an existing 25 foot tall, 200 square foot , 2 tenant panel , freestanding sign with a 29 foot high, 230 square foot, pylon sign including 4 tenant panels . The following is a zoning conformance matrix which compares the proposed project with the development standards contained within Article 961 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Section Issue Required/Permitted Proposed 9610 . 5(b) Sign criteria for 2 freestanding signs 4 signs Secondary Business per 400 ft . of Identification for frontage - 855 ft . sites with over = 4 freestanding 400 ft . of frontage signs Maximum area 230 sq. ft . * 30 sq. ft ./sign Maximum Height 7 ft. 29 ft. * Minimum distance Approximately between freestanding 60 ft. * signs - 200 ft . * Special sign permit request On May 11, 1989 , the Design Review Board approved Planned Sign Program No . 88-4 for the wall signs at the subject retail center . The conditions of approval included the requirement that the Winchells sign be modified to eliminate the "Edinger Plaza" panel and to have a maximum height of 8 feet and that a center identification sign be provided at the main entrance. The applicant was informed that the proposed 25 foot high double pole sign would require the granting of a special sign permit by the Planning Commission. The Design Review Board did, however, vote to recommend approval of the proposed sign to the Planning Commission. The subject property is over 600 feet deep which allows more "major tenants" than would typically be located on a parcel with 885 feet of frontage. Therefore, staff and the Design Review Board recognize that additional signage from what is permitted by Code is needed to provide exposure for the major tenants located to the rear of the property. Staff believes that a 29 foot tall sign as requested by the applicant is not appropriate for the site. Instead, staff concurs with the Design Review Board that the sign should remain at 25 feet in height, and that, if four tenant panels are needed, existing panels on the Staff Report - 4/17/90 -3- (5414d) sign should be reduced in size in order to accommodate the new panels . Staff has prepared Attachment No . 5 to illustrate the staff recommendation for the proposed sign. Attachment No . 6 illustrates the staff recommendation for reduction of the existing Winchells sign. 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 as modified by staff with the following findings and conditions of approval . (Modifications include reducing the sign' s height to 25 feet and requiring the Winchells sign to be modified as shown on Attachment No . 6 . ) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL : 1 . Strict compliance with Section 9610 . 5 will result in a substantial hardship to the applicant . The depth of the lot permits more "major tenants" than would usually be located on a parcel with a frontage of 855 feet . Permitting only four secondary tenant signs does not provide adequate exposure to those "major tenants" located at the rear of the subject property; therefore, additional signage is required . 2 . The sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area . The sign is to be located where an existing 25 foot high pole sign is located. No additional negative impacts are anticipated. 3 . The sign will not be detrimental -to properties located in the vicinity. The sign is located approximately 230 feet from the nearest adjacent property on the south side of Edinger Avenue. No additional negative impacts are anticipated from the construction of the subject sign. 4 . The sign will not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and will not be a hazardous distraction . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plans and elevations received and dated February 8 , 1990 , shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications : a . The sign shall have a maximum height of 25 feet . The tenant panel configuration shall be modified to include four tenant - panels as ' shown on Attachment No . 5 . 2 . Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . Submit copy of the revised elevations pursuant to Condition No . 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. Staff Report - 4/17/90 -4- (5414d) b. The property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that if the public right-of-way is expanded, the property owner shall be responsible f.or the cost of reconstruction, relocation, and/or demolition of the subject sign. C. The existing Winchells sign shall be modified to have a maximum height of 8 feet and to eliminate the "Edinger Plaza" panel (see Attachment No . 6) . 3 . The applicant may submit plans for a center identification sign to be located at the main entrance to the retail center for approval . Said sign shall be subject to Design Review Board approval . 4 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . 5 . Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may deny Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 with findings . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Area map 2 . Narrative 3 . Reduced site plans and elevations dated February 8, 1990 4 . Design Review Board minutes dated May 11, 1989 , regarding their approval of Planned Sign Program No . 88-4 5 . Staff recommendation for the proposed sign - 6 . Staff/Design Review Board recommendation for Winchells sign modification HS :TR:kla Staff Report - 4/17/90 -5- (5414d) LANNING o SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 23-5-1 1 ac•LE ..FEETO CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA � M A P USE OF PROPERTY NIAP EDINGER AVE J L I L . I I 17 N I_J Q J m AL DRICN AVE. LORGE <R. y ti._UES BLS DP I\ I J I I I I I I I g I y VI LIAI I OR P,_ STAK AVE. STOvr N'OOD op.. WW I I I I I I _ - I NURDY CR. u - v I- AMAZQJ Da C F-R CAND'.LIGHT CR eJ c=rr oR. --1 _-� I Z H OLT AVE. z�- I z Y I STAR:�H: Cr, _________ �r F_ (C I Wil 7 ANITA LN. M'ONIIDHT CR I I "-� j I I I S MG1 1 .1 ILP AV ' '•^!`-• J JU IET LOW DR. �,:LEN71%E DR u a � I r•} I I I :tI I GLENCOE A SUNLIGHT l 1�1 OP ��•tiI C, - I i E _____-_ I III I = ^ 1 ALHAMDRA s ALHAMDRA DR. HEIL j I = cR DANUDE DR J / c SEINE I I I I I DRN p� - Y•:\'iJ�E MADDOX DR yr o� •rRrS_[R DR EE J p9 f •_ (?....A .!Ew Scmo,:4.) I z a o. ' DEALER u RHINE F (' i• WAI.A On. O' nrRr VI • ulllr<HIFRC�RIZ Op`rl l Ise 9 S ,< Hoao«oa. CF-R I IaURT CC'S:M:;ulTv P:.'INi � � . I y4 O C.F.C-D. O. C. f. C D C6-1 Z ... •• TCViI;I'S[ , ,antra .. W DR ��' l..t Il ilQ.i ill``, ED �TF + ER. WARNER AVE f.f f f f f f c r f ITEM No 11 `` f f r f f f f f t t ( f f ( C C DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATIONS FOR HUNTINGTON BEACH No . 1 SWC-EDINGER and SHER AVENUES HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA February 6 , 1990 The commercial shopping complex located at the southwest corner of Edinger and Sher serves the entire neighborhood around the project. North of the project site across Edinger is a mall with Montgomery Ward and on the south side there is a large housing project. Some of. the major tenants for Huntington Beach No. 1 include Sav-On Drugs, Phil & Jim' s,t Kids R Us and Michael ' s . Other tenant uses on the site are general retail in nature . The 35 , 000 square feet originally designed market area was split up between two tenants . To accommodate these two tenants (Kids R Us and Michael ' s) , we had to remodel the canopies . This work was completed within the last quarter of 1989 by our company. Because the center pylon sign is centrally located and is the only major pylon sign allowed by the City of Huntington Beach, each of the major tenants have expressed strong interest in obtaining a visible _ location on this pylon sign. These major tenants are the sole anchors to this shopping center , and thus , we feel that to accommo- date their needs would serve the interests of the City of Huntington Beach, as well as the surrounding community. VK/smb VK4/144 2/6/90 ...... _____ ) J f I I I [ f C f f f f f [ f ! ( C. f f f f f f f f ( ITEM No. 12 `f f f C !. G ! f ( ( f ( ( ( ( The reason we have come up with a special sign pylon design is to assist the City of Huntington Beach in overcoming a mistake in the issuance of sign permits for a portion of the sign pylon to two separate entities . The Kids R Us store opened for business in August, 1988 and they evidentally installed a sign face without a sign permit. Sav-On Drugs was issued a sign permit on March 3 , 1989 for the bottom half of the Kids R Us sign face location . Sav-On Drugs was in the process of having the sign prepared and installed and they had six months to do so, which gave them through September 3 , 1989 to install their sign. Meanwhile, Kids R Us applied for a sign permit for their sign faces and a sign permit was issued to them on May 10 , 1989 long before the expiration of Sav-On Drugs' sign permit. The solution we have suggested will allow Sav-On Drugs the same size of sign face above the Kids R Us sign which is acceptable to them and will solve any legal problems , both for the City of Huntington Beach and the Developer, as Huntington Beach No. 1 , who is the �yr y ^ YV^ L..T ( ••• ♦ i f - ( ( C •• • • • i C. C C. ' ( ( ( C ••• • • i ( C C ' ( O t • • i C C ( Owner/Developer, has a legal obligation to both Kids R Us and Sav-On Drugs to provide sign space on the p�'Lon'• ;'• In . addition to sign face for Michaels ' Store , a newly-opened tenant in the shopping center , who , due to the size of their store, requires a sign spot on the pylon. As such, in a spirit of cooperation with the City of Huntington Beach, we have come up with this design and hope that we can both solve this embarrassing situation by modifying the sign pylon design and building a new pylon of the proposed design. Therefore, we feel that this request will preserve the property rights of the tenants without being material- ly detrimental to the public welfare. AP/smb AP13/133 2/8/90 STA F p osPROPOSED �1J f-op-,ce�tr� Z P7'LoN SiGTti( . 'I00";rkPIt ka,T-d0�k p�N �S WIE�E 5, ►T z r (6o�one l ��x�S�-r��j , • �. ' `EPING x PLAZA • :I': I'� `,} 'i''_ go�O�prr sir X /Nv W/ jmTMTM / 11111l11111111� / [IIIIIII�II ;,.� . IIIIII V � •'• :�.�: C.'�` L-CC cTlo i 3�2I 'n o I ' 1 t In'O� __ 4 I • I • I ill�� If�t•lilt Grlt.lill4-Iitirl-} ltns.�larrl� IlNralll�.t�r� rr[RiI' Ib �lll l��'I l/11P111 Ft�t} 1111,1(rtcull{ tout) i"'0n v �,�trN),� 'I,(.•IF•111�=• Fy,rY '. 1-i�F.4[: ilt r l�.Nk 1 I C s Epa0=j , ) 'ilk � Grp°i�1��'^�nl�� ,� � � �• ®rQ 1 t V-61 o • - ((Iir;: I+II, ILL, I-"YW 1 �ISN I ' � Wtl YYY r / b.Ulll�r=t I. I u1Zr1 ' IGI"i GraPHI M 4 '--o-�-•.. Ili�•i 1•�• � i DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES May 11, 1989 3 : 30 p . m. Members Present : Mike Adams , Frank Higgins , Councilman Jim Silva Councilman Mays (arrived at 3 : 50 p .m. ) , Mark Porter, (arrived at 3 : 55 p .m. ) Absent : Kirk Kirkland Staff Present : Sergio Martinez SECOND BLOCK MAIN STREET: Applicant : City of Huntington Beach/Redevelopment Agency Request : Review proposed public improvements . Location: 200 Block of Main Street Sta\Planner Laura Phillips explained td the Board that the proposal consists of two open courts , -:one on Fifth Street and the other on Maim Street, intended to be connected through the alley for ped• s�trian use . Laura resented Ti Pickel and"" Denn Smith all consultants p �► Y g designing the prof ecct . Discussion followed wi h the main concern focusing on one of the the two court ' s connection through the alley and parking demarkation on theZdjacent pro-perties . Adams requested that all railings to separate pedestrians from parking be anodized with color to/Witch lamps . Alley llumination is proposed by two (2) fixtures attached .to buildings owned by the City. Adams ad a motion to recommend approval in- concept, Daryl Smit seconded and more discussion followed. 'Adams suggested ' ad tional .schematics to clear the concerns . Adams motioned to ecommend that the City retain the same consultant . Higgins seconded and the motion passed 6-0 . ` B . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NO. 89-7 : Applicant : Watt Commercial Development Corporation Request : Remodeling of canopy areas , additional store front and repaintiAg. of the shopping center . Location: Southwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Sher Lane f; : ;.::_< `r=•.fir.::. Staff Planner. Sergio Martinez introduced to the Board Ron Pha_dnis, ..;applicant representative. m4s: ve 0 n Mr . Phadnis explained to the Board the proposed changes using a site plan and colored detailed elevations . After some questions on the project were clarified by Mr . Phadnis , Board member Smith made a motion to approve the project as proposed. Higgins seconded and the motion passed 6-0 . Staff member Martinez explained to the Board that the second part of the application concerned the building signs on the rear buildings and the freestanding signs along Edinger Avenue . The Board shall review Planned Sign Program No . 88-4 as part of this application and make a recommendation to the Planning Commission on a twenty-five (25) foot freestanding sign, containing four panels, proposed adjacent to Edinger Avenue . This will require the approval of a special sign permit . After clarifications and discussions between Mr . Phadnis and the Board members , Adams made a motion to recommend to the _ Planning Commission the approval of Planned Sign Program No . - 88-4 with a special sign permit, including the following stipulations : o Wall signs shall consist of channel letters (colors,. materials and sizes proposed) . Businesses along Edinger Avenue shall keep existing wall signs . o The monument signs along Edinger Avenue for Denny' s Restaurant , Citicorp Savings and. Weinerschnitzel Restaurant . shall remain as existing . o The freestanding sign for Winchell ' s Donuts shall be reduced to eight feet (8 ' ) in height . o There shall be a center identification sign (monument type) at the Edinger Avenue main entrance. o The approval of a proposed twenty-five (25) foot high -pole sign with four panels for. the. major tenants identification signs shall be required. : t.. Yf.`; 4 The motion was seconded..by Higgins and it passed 6-0 . Councilmen Silva and Mays left the meeting at 5 : 00 p.m. y PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM 8 - • .. -: CIF-. Thi item was ntinued to the sp ial meeting May 18, 1989 - ' by a mo rom Adams, "seconded 'by Ip' znS-:.:"`Mb'tio:rY- a 4 `- D. WALL GN: plicant Ta.rbell Realt ' t . - s .c�;tea -..Request •Wall signs .`.. Location 20800. Beach` Boulevard `.. �Mti ? ell- �y�-b; r ?,.: t'ir- -- r`: _ � � -- .F SR' 1.,�'•''�' DRB 'Minutes 5/11/89 27 h�� ` > 5. _ �':, i f -•` - "( i v f t f -t- i' S 4°1 t-• ii� ' 'Y r x,[.V}� frn�.a:`Y -y�, v i c -- - - ,� _•r l f aj'�'yv�'.x � H ` :.�'1�— l -Y ♦ a1^ of F� !� .! s",'('G rjtN�(. 'L �i f•�- aS�" - .:r -w: a - 1 - Ss -.a.-yt`A7 f x� / .•7, .y, �'. ::. 4{�tv_`-c^'.:`t7.,t`wM:.'�.' C 3�igS�Ym INN - 1 � s _-...r:��.-mac E+ .cz�.W�?� Ep •` x R z COJ s KI P S 31 Q *S �t s P FLII LFLI no Cl C� � Q SALES " � - - •ice - _- - wl b s 7 AK. r ,F, r .�� T-Y� ,[, Yi \ - l 1 - yi� � ,�:�!fr S,ly�}J� f �3-..-. � [- ' '�`�+•^�^'•;,�t_�s��_h�.��'{.�3.�dr��7'� �r�� t r ' 3 c - v r+yil � `�'�`. •c•'�yY. J�� t S_�n r�lt�- a y� e'f"��-° �'� ry/1 'r- ,k i t ,�t-:�°a`�i+f�� •,��$'v by � :�' .. ..•.•.! ..n.: K�:.� 1 ��I<'n �y 3 -...-..s.F °`�..�' tv. �:x �`z�s�'ti•r+{{� i 2� �jtpR�� 3c t� ' - -".3c1:.•. -'�., :t _ ..1., ,,,}ram. <_ti: .,;krx.. �� k�'v'� r rF f � 3 t -xt. -f 1 a• _--�•?kiS'k +stc--��1 - �1 s aJ.4' '• 1 �y -e:A.'�iq,!�":', •*�71 61.v'm'�?q'+C1 w°Si�w �-a J.gR'i' -' -.. .S.-....n tom.:, -..+.....in•�?-ricl:cFl+4�lJ 1 "Llita ix�7rl!4 J-N 3 w 1A'D V_.1: I ll I I r=d 4 � N it " o- t E i �. 91 _ N s n Lfni a_ Z •:a 2v i a'e'1• 0=•• ERo. 1 WATT COMMERCIAL u"" iNPCT` AN "ITICT DEVELOpMEN? .': RP. aNnN�iT� e�.�,Al exisrir+� siaNs n-y S & ASSOCIATES. n : - ^.`$ i71 / Iic� c C�.N T� ►nwi `.�JS[AN�IIA O1T RSIA YOrtrGA,CA, Monlei.Cdllornl0.: fin• c�.c-� SwcceNea.e• H PHADHIB.IEIf1f0f-0040. ,. o �r.JoAn Hanl.r IaIA)- H i V ... LI l�y� Tm M^TCW FitI��6"2s�1 al � E:l�r/rytn AIiE' DO O� v.Th P/1X r G.O• C.9j� it T67C�ATf� /y1GT�1L GOl�� o'-9'O/ l P.4,ifT/�AT1RT�7Cl�Nao NJ To r^^TGf pf;L^_sE 584ow 17 O r Mt�I�TTnn nn 4 ' sue,. EW U L�V �o/✓ciC rd�S_ 15 t ri E ) C E-iT EFL lC)eM TiPlU;Pm =� TCIVVY TaN.WT INviVtOU/�Lty IL'WMIw�T6D ; TSHANT DIREGTOfLy . T TEN/.NT r^N EIS Sl1 P� DIR�Tofzy SrgN Tsw^AJT TeIIHT. WH1TE� oK.9n Srr&A yeD Lex,-,F J Y:/L / Re?HM N/kns #22As —'If— 1 .2:0.. wl I-4 ET L—TP-" srti�-e- L5LJI1l1V�L5Lni I O,O B=0'• 2.11 011 13 t�9l--,Oda"+aL-4'0 -.waroAh.ea. 9/74l ~�/D - i ' � s 5 : KIPS A QwS \ P LFLL�o� � ( O a PQPUA�\ uv co 1 19 . DES &? SEM,7llGE (foi s or TArF RECOMMENDATION -:")ooiTA F F RECOM � T FoK \dINCHELLS SlGN i 1Nl V ATT RECEIVED COMMERCIAL CITY CLERK PROPERTIES CITY OF HUNTHM1,C1N " EACH, CALIF. INC. MAY 9 8 25 A0 '90 JAVET S.SEGAL PRESIDEN•r May 7, 1990 Mr. Hal Simmons Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 91648 Re: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT No. 90-1 APPEAL AGAINST DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING OF MAY 1 , 1990 Dear Mr. Simmons: This letter will confirm our intent to appeal the decision made by the Planning Commission on Agenda Item B-2, Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 , in which the Commission denied the Staff' s recommendation and our project request for a 29 foot pylon as a shopping center pylon. Enclosed please find our check in the amount of $200 which is the fee applicable for the filing of this appeal. We understand that there is no formal appeal application; therefore, this letter will indicate our intention to appeal the Planning Commission decision. Please advise us of the date and time of the City Council hearing so that we may prepare our presentation accordingly. 2716 OCEAN PARK BOULEVARD POST OFFICE BOX 2114 SANTA INIONICA. CALIFORNIA 90406 2131450-0779, FAX 213/452-9134 Mr. Hal Simmons City of Huntington Beach May 7 , 1990 Page 2 If you require additional information, please advise the undersigned immediately. Very truly yours, HUNTINGTON BEACH No. 1 , a California limited partnership By: WATT COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC. , a California corporation (Its General Partner) By ARUN PWADNIS Its Assistant Vice President AP/smb AP15/137 cc: Ms. Janet S . Segal, Watt Commercial Properties, Inc. Mr. John W. Hunter, Jr. , Watt Commercial Dev. Co. Mr. Robert C. Shields, Watt Industries, Inc. Ms. Wendy Campbell, Watt Management Company Ms. Connie Nicholson, BCN Lighting Corp. Ms. Vandana Kelkar, PHS & Associates, Inc. COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES C. J NN F:r s.yF.c%t. rrtrsint:vi May 11 , 1990 Ms . Connie Brockway, CMC _ City Clerk ' City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street VIA TELEFAX Huntington Beach, CA 92648 714/969-5684 Re: BACK-UP INFORMATION FOR CA c� APPEAL FILED ON 5-9-90 APPEAL TO PC DECISION SSP-90-1 Dear Ms. Brockway: In addition to the appeal letter dated May 7 , 1990 which we submitted on May 9 , 1990 , please note the follow- ing reasons for appealing the Planning Commission decision on SSP-90-1 : (1) The shopping center is extraordinarily deeper than the normal parking lot depth which creates a necessi- ty for additional pylon signage on the street frontage. (2) The lot size is also substantially larger than a typical parking lot, and again, this necessitates the additional signage. (3) The City of Huntington Beach has issued overlap- ping sign permits for the same space to two major tenants. Both of the tenants are insisting upon their right to install their sign pursuant to the issued sign permits. At present, Sav-On Drugs does not have a sign on the pylon because Kids R Us has been issued a sign permit taking Sav-On' s spot. What we are requesting is that Sav-On Drugs ' sign be added above the Kids R Us sign to facili- tate this awkward situation, as well as to avoid a possi- ble legal battle between the City and our major tenants, i.e. , Sav-On Drugs and Kids R Us. 2716 OCE:1:ti PARK BOULENAR11 POST OFFICE BOX 2111 SANTA 31Un1C.A. CALIFORNIA 90106 2131450-0779, FAX 2131152-9131 r . � i Ms. Connie Brockway City of Huntington Beach. May 11 , 1990 Page 2 (4) This shopping center has more than the normal number of major tenants which requires additional sign space. For example, Michael' s has been added as a major tenant and they need exposure on the sign pylon, as well. Based upon the above, we hope the City Council will be sympathetic to the issues we have highlighted in this letter. A separate letter is forthcoming from Sav-On Drug Stores , Inc. Very truly yours, HUNTINGTON BEACH No. 1 , a Calif. limited partnership By: WATT COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC. , a California corporation (Its General Partner) By ARUN PHAD S Its Assistant Vice President AP/smb AP15/140 cc: Mr. John W. Hunter, Jr. , Watt Commercial Dev. Co. Ms. Janet S . Segal, Watt Commercial Properties, Inc. Ms. Wendy Campbell, Watt Management Company ALTERNATIVE NO. 1 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Strict compliance with Section 9610. 5 will result in a substantial hardship to the applicant. The depth of the lot permits more "major tenants" than would usually be located on a parcel with a frontage of 855 feet. Permitting only four secondary tenant signs does not provide adequate exposure to those "major tenants" located at the rear of the subject property; therefore, additional signage is required. 2 . The sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area.. The _ sign is to be located where an existing 25 foot high pole sign is located. No additional negative impacts are anticipated. 3 . The sign will not be detrimental to properties located in the vicinity. The sign is located approximately 230 feet from the nearest adjacent property on the south -side of Edinger Avenue. No additional negative impacts are anticipated from the construction of the subject sign. 4 . The sign will not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility anp will not be a hazardous distraction. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plans and elevations received and dated February 8, 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications : a. The sign shall have a maximum height of 25 feet. The tenant panel configuration shall be modified to include four tenant panels with a maximum area of 180 square feet as shown on Attachment No. 5 in the Planning Commission staff report dated April 17, 1990. 2 . Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. Submit copy of the revised elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. b. The property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the . County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that if the public right-of-way is expanded, the property owner shall be responsible for the cost of reconstruction, relocation, and/or demolition of the subject sign. c. The existing Winchells sign shall be modified to have a maximum height of 8 feet and to eliminate the "Edinger Plaza" panel (see Attachment No. 6 in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 17, 1990) . 3 . The applicant may submit plans for a center identification sign to be located at the main entrance to the retail center for approval . Said sign shall be subject to Design Review Board approval . 4 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . 5 . Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. ALTERNATIVE NO. 2 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Strict compliance with Section 9610 . 5 will result in a substantial hardship to the applicant. The depth of the lot permits more "major tenants" than would usually be located on a parcel with a frontage of 855 feet. Permitting only four secondary tenant signs does not provide adequate exposure to those "major tenants" located at the rear of the subject property; therefore, additional signage is required. 2 . The sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area. The sign is to be located where an existing 25 foot high pole sign is located. No additional negative impacts are anticipated. 3 . The sign will not be detrimental to properties located in the vicinity. The sign is located approximately 230 feet from the nearest adjacent property on the south side of Edinger Avenue. No additional negative impacts are anticipated from the construction of the subject sign. 4 . The sign will not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and will not be a hazardous distraction. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plans and elevations received and dated February 8, 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2 . Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. The property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that if the public right-of-way is expanded, the property owner shall be responsible for the cost of reconstruction, relocation, and/or demolition of the subject sign. b. The existing Winchells sign shall be modified to have a maximum height of 8 feet and to eliminate the "Edinger Plaza" panel (see Attachment No. 6 in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 17, 1990) . 3 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. 4 . Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. ALTERNATIVE NO. 1 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i i i FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Strict compliance with Section 9610 . 5 will result in a substantial hardship to the applicant. The depth of the lot permits more "major tenants" than would usually be located on a parcel with a frontage of 855 feet . Permitting only four secondary tenant signs does not provide adequate exposure to those "major tenants" located at .the rear of the subject property; therefore, additional signage is required. 2 . The sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area . The sign is to be located where an existing 25 foot high pole sign is located. No additional negative impacts are anticipated. 3 . The sign will not be detrimental to properties located in the vicinity. The sign is located approximately 230 feet from the nearest adjacent property on the south side of Edinger Avenue. No additional negative impacts are anticipated from the construction of the subject sign. 4 . The sign will not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and will not be a hazardous distraction. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plans and elevations received and dated February 8 , 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications : a . The sign shall have a maximum height of 25 feet . The tenant panel configuration shall be modified to include four tenant panels with a- maximum- area of 180 square feet as shown on Attachment No . 5 in the Planning Commission staff report dated April 17, 1990 . 2 . Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . Submit copy of the revised elevations pursuant to Condition No . 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. b. The property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that if the public right-of-way is expanded, the property owner shall be responsible for the cost of reconstruction, relocation, and/or demolition of the subject sign. C . The existing Winchells sign shall be modified to have a maximum height of 8 feet and to eliminate the "Edinger Plaza" panel (see Attachment No. 6 in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 17, 1990) . - kiadl pie t 3 . The applicant may submit plans for a center identification sign to be located at the main entrance to the retail center for approval . Said sign shall be subject to Design Review Board approval . 4 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . 5 . Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. ALTERNATIVE NO. 2 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1 . Strict compliance with Section 9610 . 5 will result in a substantial hardship to the applicant . The depth of the lot permits more "major tenants" than would usually be located on a parcel with a frontage of 855 feet . Permitting only four secondary tenant signs does not provide adequate exposure to those "major tenants" located at the rear of the subject property; therefore, additional signage is required. 2 . The sign will not adversely affect other signs in the area . The sign is to be located where an existing 25 foot high pole sign is located. No additional negative impacts are anticipated. 3 . The sign will not be detrimental to properties located in the vicinity. The sign is located approximately 230 feet from the nearest adjacent property, on the south side of Edinger Avenue. No additional negative impacts are anticipated from the construction of the subject sign. 4 . The sign will not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and will not be a hazardous distraction. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . The site plans and elevations received and dated February 8, 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout . 2 . Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . The property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that if the public right-of-way is expanded, the property owner shall be responsible for the cost of reconstruction, relocation, and/or demolition of the subject sign. b. The existing Winchells sign shall be modified to have a maximum height of 8 feet and to eliminate the "Edinger Plaza" panel (see Attachment No . 6 in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 17, 1990) . 3 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . 4 . Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date oU final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. I I 1�� Aufhorized to Publish Advertisements of 0 kir: s u:cluding -public notices t..Decree of the Superior Court of C:ange County, California, Plumber A-6214, September 29, 1961, and A-24831 June 11. 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange i2URICIN01I6E =y . am a Citizen of the United States and a NOTICEARIN `PUBLIC;;HEARING� ' APPEAL 6',,PLAN_IN resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the COMMISSION S;DENIA(. OF SPECIAL SIGNIPERMI; age of eighteen years, and not a party to or N n 1 ' .g ,.V (AA request to permltt th interested in the below entitled matter. I am a construction` of a free• standing sign that exceeds, principal clerk of the ORANGE COAST DAILY 'the=Code paNd 'ed height arid- area `nd does knot?. PILOT, a newspaper of general circulation 'distance wleq Ii.e�miriimumi • distance�rkequlred}betweem .�. other freestanding slgnon? printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, the, it :.; I NOTICE IS HEREBY County of Orange, State of Cafifomia, and that GIVEN that the Huntington: Beach CityCouncii wrll Pp,dM attached Notice is a true and complete copy as a piibile hearingdm the Coun= cil'Chaco ber;K`Fafflthe-'Hunt was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, ington Beach-Civic Center Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain 2000 ingt'oneach�BiWAk reef 'Hunt Callfornla•eonl the date an&at theitime1n-i dI6ated below:to receive and 1 Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and con§Ider the:state men ts-of Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper to wit all-,persons whodwlsh.fo,be gIheard relative'to thelappli• cation described below: the issue(s) of. DAT{EGS.IME;,::Monday; June 4r 1990„7,00 PMs` f• APPLICATION NUMBER:+' _ Appeal of -Planning Com--4 missions dental of Special I May 24, 1990 Sign Permlt;No 90 1 , 1 ..A, P P -�L 1 CANVAPPELLANT i-WatV ommerclalrlDevelopment; +Corporation "1_•LOCATION;;;6Shopping# �center.et-the southwest-cor=I her-of Edinge6Aven6e and; ..Sher Lane4;, + _- ZONE iun C2-FP2(Comrri . - ty-:'Bustne'ss DI§trict Floodplam) REQUEST tTo'-permit-the construction 'of.: a ,free= standing slgn.that.ezceedsl the-Code f perm(tted�:maxi- mum height§(29r.Feetrin'lieu: of 7 feet) maaxlmum`area; (250,squareifeet,rn lieu of 30 square feet) and doesanot comply V With;-tthe,=minimum 1 distance-•*required=•between] other freestanding signs_oni the site-(approximately 601 feet in lieu of 200 feet). i ENVIRO,NM-,,E.N;TA.L declare, under penalty of perjury, that the STATUS: Caterically ex- empt,pursugoant Ab Sectlon foregoing is true and correct. 15311;_Class 1.1;of,the,Cali-I fornia Environmental Oudllty. Act. ON FILE A,copy of;they Executed on-- May 24 f 99�. proposed request is on_file in � the -Community, ,Develop- at Costa Mesa, California. ment. pepatment,.yi2o00f Main,;Street,,,:Hunington !Beach,California 92W,_for] lnspection.by-the public: I ALL. INTEREST_D-:•PER-' SONS are invited to•attend! Sinature said, hearing and express) g opinions or,submlt evidence for or,against-the aplication as.outlined above. -If there are any further questions i please call Thomas Rogers, Assistant Planner„ at 536-5271 Connie I DATED•May 22 99 10. y I Coie Brockway .City PROOF OF PUBLICATION Clerk, Clty. of Huntington} Beach Published Orange.Coast' +Daily Pilot.May 24 199 II Th-423 1 - - - - --- - CFO ------- -- -- ------ --- - ------ -- ---- - - ---- ---------- -------- --- ' Publish 5/24/90 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 90-1 (A request to permit the construction of a freestanding sign that exceeds the Code permitted height and area and does not comply with the minimum distance required between other freestanding signs on the site. ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, June 4, 1990, 7 :00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission' s denial of Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Watt Commercial Development Corporation . LOCATION: Shopping center at the southwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Sher Lane ZONE: C2-FP2 -(Community Business District-Floodplain) REQUEST: To permit the construction of a freestanding sign that . exceeds the Codec,,permitted maximum height (29 feet in lieu of 7 'feet) , maximum area (250 square feet in lieu of 30 square feet) and does not comply with the minimum distance required between other freestanding signs on ' the. site ;(approximately 60' feet in lieu of 200 feet) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15311, Class 11, of the California -- Environmerita-1°Quality Act . ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the . public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Thomas Rogers, Assistant Planner, at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Dated: 5/22/90 Legal Notice - City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach. CA 92648 •�'�J 6w 4 •-J.P Si ut "� Y 2 4 '9 j T S is✓ 1 n k 1+ 1r FOSENIDER@ d -- 142-332-01. EMIL . R TERRAZAS " REASONUlF.CNED 9761 VILLA WODDS DR Unclairr:z,7 c;u�;,_ _ VILLA PARK_-9-_CAL 92667 - - ---- - -- ---------- --------— No such street—number —� No such office in state FORWrIRDiNG DER EXPIRED " Do not.remail in this envelope -FIRST CLASS MAIL Hrn:rrNcrrwv UCH . + r ru rr rtr rr rrn r r r I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 90-1 (A request to permit the construction of a freestanding sign that exceeds the Code permitted height and area and does not comply with the minimum distance required between other freestanding signs on the site. ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, June 4 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission' s denial of Special Sign Permit No . 90-1 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Watt Commercial Development Corporation LOCATION: Shopping center at the southwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Sher Lane ZONE: C2-FP2 (Community Business District-Floodplain) REOUEST: To permit the construction of a freestanding sign that exceeds the Code permitted maximum height (29 feet in lieu of 7 feet) , maximum area (250 square feet in lieu of 30 square feet) and does not comply with the minimum distance required between other freestanding signs on the site (approximately 60 feet in lieu of 200 feet) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15311, Class 11, of the California Environmental Quality Act . ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Thomas Rogers , Assistant Planner, at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach (5833d-3) px'.',�+�.-.a`s.;+_'aa-+er-.r•. .eat,.,.r::L 3.rr-.,-.,Lw.•..L..r., nr ,��.. Is.:i�.. i. i y� ,i�7/+. • ��jf 'F��"lL��`fii. Ynrrr t • • 1 � �r7�1�4 �a?�f.,,b'��,..�,�`h�`i _1 w� .r-+ "p,F��y�',}',4• SEYULI .�, _ r se• ',,..�.-xar a `�X��,y ..o t. �.e��r;ld.j•+4_rk.. •nw.irt'�`�..!*? � ,e� k� te�.'ar. ` 1• y` WINCHELLS DONUTS • iEDINGER AVEfi •i 1 1 : • • H.B CA 92647 h` r. SHAMPOO ROOM � et HUNTINGTC7N BEACH CA. 92647 pxi t. fir+ SsW ei'' 4 'A t 3�3b YyK-a1 r' a ' 1 `'• a a a '� x� Te?' -r<.J..-..•'Y`:v.. x.=4YM.G_ '+! :gw�_. ..,�n..H��..+ra+.f S-:H1:CLt� �.:`,,�s""fTfR�'°��.Il. `-..-�.A"S.� S-`. -41'?�'.,P� •. �>�.R:f-f�i�L.t •�� lr'l1_ JI• PHIL AND 7532 1 . AVE • 4ry UNICORN SPORTS H.B. 92647 4� 7632 EDINGER ! 92647 t �f{Fj��1P1, r .lr4 f.M,Y` .aJ.n'a.i�$a74%.. cc t TLrhp,y, Yyt3 'M. O P 1- p r a Y„ 1r`i.1ry ' 1 S. ;rZJAt �� p� •; •� ,. � .;.' r_ - _.,,y:N. �3-t�t�.-1S �Y'��•i�` "L'i.° �i!? ', t�E:t''��t`b i 1 US I, 1 •11 • 1 ' AVE CA. 92647 t TUSC . a x _ NY LIAN PIZZA •i ' 1 1 ' 3 •2647 5 t�S � y47�t��v; w�-t'i L}ag��a u;'� 4.4� `•s �?�1�. BRIDAL MICHK_ • 1 �Gd •1 1' 1 • ` :. 92647 • H.B. 92647 vn s SAV 4' 1 ` 7542 EDINGER AVE •1 1 tf H.B. 92647 r �r. !Ar h°� `�4•'t•^ 'yS -q -` Y -. •}.-,.cr- � C ,. t ,.•r ,,.3�._:;.rW ....-=;.-.,r-t-l.•,r..r�,.r..:.,.,�_ _ - �' 71 BUKHARA CUISINE H.B. CA 92647 Mw I 1�tdntl� '• a R L,Y.,n.-.fir:-_' r,,, t r. 81 r_'j t'�.. •L CCU �a '�.. �.--•�--�;—- �,.:�.- =-"`'_ ..ate-,_ '...�Mom. -� — = ':�r`;�' .. _ .... .....r,;r... ...• ..Ri:p.a',m•yy....�.;.�.N.t;..a,i','i�?i�9tal{r:ap,.. 142-511-08 ! 142-511-09 URGE CIRCLE LTD FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK LORGE CIRCLE, LTO WEBSCO INC MURDYj J A JR %WEBSCO INC 507 N' TUSTIN ' AVE SUITE A 334 VIA LIDO NORD 1507 N TUSTIN AVE SUITE A ANTA ANA9 CA NEWPORT BEACH9 CAL 9 SANTA ANAs CA 142-511-11 ORGE CIRCLE LTD WEBSCO INC 507 N TUSTIN AVE SUITE A ANTA ANAq CA ?Hr ,+mrr,>rarz�a�ma�z':ms�mamlTcai*ao�xn�sy SEARCH COMPLETE : 4 RECOR READ, RETURNED: 4 ssP 90 _ OPYRIGHT TRW . 1986 ----- IN } , •y , . 4 i r 17 ' Y 661 �:: ' .. .. ear .:,:.. ...:. .:.'.'' .. •, I S fi . CURTIS DAVIDSON � t 7644 EDINGER AVE s H.B.CA. 92647 , •• „ ... Mn.urw Hr v•r•,Ak. ^•.a ,• L -ew++e:Ya .tYP!"r-''-^::.r• e..Mo-n .kr._"2tH7i rla,. :,"aMxuae _KCyerF} J "— r.�ia"{:• cNt AnA-• cty^t,.�..,..�Mh 'iGeLSdil='= „Nk'r{ni+ylneieeJnu,l,w'�ix.��u•.Jnar-`�..,_'.•. .;. 142-071-66 142-071-91 ya ,qy FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK WARD DEVELOP MONTGOMERY ATTN DAVID M --QfVINS TAX DIV 18-S 212 HIGH :ST ;, } 1 MONTGOMERY WARD PLAZA 33 POTTSTOWN9 P.A 19464 ; CHICAG09CA 6067 loc(C1 ' 142-111-18 142-111-28 - 142-111-32 ENTERPRISES SARM PARTNERSHIP HUNTINGTON ENTERPRISES SARM 320 108TH AVE NE #306 P 0 BOX 6348 320 108TH AVE NE 9306 BELLEVUE9 WA. ,98004 ORANGE , CA 92667 BELLEVUE , WA 98004 (� 142-112-05 � 142-1.12-08i V STEPHEN HUNT BEACH #1 HUNTINGTON `.� w -swkM11% � 910 STRAND XWATT COMMERCIAL PROP j6 � (rrgl�a�►-� S1', HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90Z54 2716 OCEAN PARK BLVD p SANTA MON/c /t i CA 7►p°�a 6 car Oeac JGA : a 6Y9 14Z-112-09 142-112-10 14L-3 BEACH #1 HUNTINGTON BEACH #1 HUNTINGTON MARIA E EVANS . SUITE . 2013 SUITE 2013' - 7890 E SPRING ST #14-H 2716 . 00EAN PARK BLVD 2716 OCEAN PARK BLVD LONG- BEACH9 CAL . 90815 m SANTA..,MONICA9 CA 904 SANTA MONICA, CA 904 142=331-13 _ • + ...1.42-331-14 142-331-15 ROGER A STOLLENWERK DRESNICK ''"C�i, Eta S TR ANDREASEN WAYNE 0 TR 10635 ANGEL AVE 12 CALLE DE :!PkI.NCESA XMORGAN, CATHY : FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 TRABUCO C,ANYpN,• .CA 92679 HCR : 42 BOX 2.777 LAS VEGAS ._, . 89124 142-331-16 142-331-17 142-331-18 ANDREASEN WAYNE D TR DONALD KUDLI,K THEODORE F GALLO XMORGANs . CATHY 7592 RHONE LN• 5302 BERKELEY AVE HCR 42 BOX Z777 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 WESTMINSTER, CAL 92683 LAS VEGAS9 NV 89124 142-331-19 /ya_33) -dL0 y 142-331-21 GERHARD H STIER �,L �.v SrJhr�` ROBERT J HANVEY 6252 . SANTA YNEZ DR j�3(, � e� L-y,_ 16042 WALTZ CIR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92647 5 l ,c-A HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 7. w•""•,t..�t:s.^.'nnne,n••f^I+".f•T. .^i^^'f�a�e,T, .`n_ -•._: rF. - 1. Y^ _ .•.. :f•..iR•,,.vrvrn�... e.sp.eMw...v.w.,...... 142-331-43 142-331-44 ° 142-332-01 a ROY T BATELLI NORMAN E .BENDER EMIL R TERRAZAS 2576 WESTMINSTER AVE 10091 BEVERLY DR 9761 VILLA WOODS DR : COSTA MESA-x CA, 92627 HUNTINGTN BCH9 CAL 92646 ' VILLA PARKS CAL 92667 . ,�.`•',..�'..�!�+�3. ':.I+s:.i17t'_ ..'r,.`:iiir:. i3�Etkr.�.PSa.JfiA', WE=Ta7rwnra c=1 M5 va U=p,,a��r,^.cm 142-332-02 �^ M�•1 ��12 �332� 142-332-04 ^ HARIL E WHETSELL 03 JOHN R WARREN 629 FRANKFORT AVE oo G- e Ln - 7631 VOLGA DR #1 HUNTINGTON BEACH• CA 92648 I'7kr► 1 �JC� G�o�6cfg HUNTINGTN BCH9 CAL 92647 _ fir• 142-332-05 142-332-06 142-332-07 HAZEL , M WARREN BOULTER HQ,W RD TR RICHARD SETIA_N .. 7621 VOLGA DR APT 1 16302 MAGELLAN . LN 6202 PACEMONT-, DR HUNTINGTN : BC .19'-CAL 92647 HUNTINGTOW BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 r 142-332-08 142-332-09 142-332-10 STEPHEN . M CHASE STEPHEN M , CHASE LARRY A TYONE 25 EAST LAKE 24 EASTLAKE 25062 .REFLEJO IRVINE9 CA 92714 IRVINE9 CA 92714 MISSION VIEJ09 CA . 92692 7 3 142-332-11 - 1.42-332-12 - 142-332-13 DANIEL J MEADOWS DRESNICK"M-ICHAEL S TR JAMES T BAKOS 7551 VOLGA 12 CALLE DE PRINCESA XLECHMAN INVESTMENTS HUNTINGTON BE.ACHs CA 92647 TRABUCO CANYONS CA 92679 P 0 BOX 6237 A A M A 9 8 N HEI � C 2 16 Mm 142-332-14 142-332-15 142-511-01 s JAMES T BAKOS SUSMAN WILLIAM 'G TR ASSOCIATES EDINGER XLECHMAN : INVESTMENTS 3035 COUNTRY ' CLUB DR TACO BELL P O BOX 6237 COSTA MESAS CA 92626 P O ' BOX 10048 ANAHEIM9 CA 92816 DALLAS , TX 75207 Ing ad .442-511-02 J.... ASSOCIATES EDINGER P - 0 BOX .10187 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658 *SEARCH COMPLETE: 40 RECOR READS RETURNED : 40 COPYRIGHT TRW 1986 .-;•,:a^ia•'t;. 1 .. _. ... r ...;,.... -•:i!... w!.., „ ;' 1!F,•,,y;m .ir.!r.»-! •v ...Z:.;v eaT;;cr-v. r.,r r•.c:K +.r(:..rF.:YRT �'G}Bmr•n•,;tkrr, 6Sfi�.64.. ti,.;4.,.... , 1` "..,. W"9r'. .•'1!t47° .r• !CrT99:je�i1R'* .,H....... t - ,. .r ...:,.... '. .. ., ....., v lrs..,:i •..' .. .. .•'.. : .. .il.r '{•./j' ht•�K4:;�hf Tr RECEIVED CoMAIIERC CAL CITY CLERK l'RUI'L' R CLEF CITY OF HUNTII1G i i ..: l"I, CALIF. INC. Fiur 9 8 25 (ail '90 May 7 , 1990 Mr. Hal Simmons Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 91648 Re : SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT No. 90-1 APPEAL AGAINST DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING OF MAY 1 , 1990 Dear Mr. Simmons : This letter will confirm our intent to appeal the decision made by the Planning Commission on Agenda Item B-2 , Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 , in which the Commission denied the Staff' s recommendation and our project request for a 29 foot pylon as a shopping center pylon. Enclosed please find our check in the amount of $200 which is the fee applicable for the filing of this appeal . We understand that there is no formal appeal application; therefore, this letter will indicate our intention to appeal the Planning Commission decision. Please advise us of the date and time of the City Council hearing so that we may prepare our presentation accordingly. M"wou4 xl S 27I6 (WE.AN PARK III IU .E AKU I4)Sr OFFICE BOX 2114. SANTA NR)NICA. CALIFORNIA 9n4.n6 2131450-0179. FAX 213/452-9131 • Mr . Hal Simmons City of Huntington Beach May 7 , 1990 Page 2 If- you require additional information , please advise the undersigned immediately. Very truly yours , HUNTINGTON BEACH No . 1 , a California limited partnership By: WATT COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES , INC . , a California corporation (Its General Partner) By ARUN FWADNIS Its Assistant Vice President AP/smb AP15/137 cc: Ms . Janet S . Segal , Watt Commercial Properties , Inc. Mr . John W. Hunter , Jr . , Watt Commercial Dev . Co. Mr. Robert C . Shields, Watt Industries, Inc. Ms . Wendy Campbell , Watt Management Company Ms . Connie Nicholson, BCN Lighting Corp. Ms . Vandana Kelkar, PISS & Associates , Inc . f WXrT - — COMMERCIAL bi S POS1 A u[ PROPEKNES INC Marra'sc�,' ' . � � .� �LIF' r, 15 92 Ms. Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk City of Huntington beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 11;I:;1;1 1: 1111!:1!1111diiddlmllIll, ddlI. d r -`'MAY 11 '90 17: 13 COMMERICAL DEVELOP. P.2 WATT CO MERCLAL PROPERTIES m�C. Jnv6r•5.S GAL MISkalti}:\S May 11 , 1990 Ms . Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street VIA TELEFAX Huntington Beach, CA 92648 714 969-5684 Re: BACK--UP INFORMATION FOR APPEAL FILED ON 5-9-90 APPEAL TO PC DECISION SSP-90-1 Dear Ms . Brockway: In addition to the appeal letter dated May 7 , 1990 which we submitted on May 9 , 1990 , please note the follow VWVW - ing reasons for appealing the Planning Commission decision on $SP-90-1 : . (1) The shopping center is extraordinarily deeper than the normal parking lot depth which creates a necessi- ty for additional pylon signage on the street frontage . (2) The lot size is also substantially larger than a typical parking lot, and again, this necessitates the additional signage. (3) The City of Huntington Beach has issued overlap- ping sign permits for the same space to two major tenants. Both of the tenants are insisting upon their right to install their sign pursuant to the issued sign permits. At present, Sav-On Drugs does not have a sign on the pylon because Kids R Us has been issued a sign permit taking Sav-On' s spot. What we are requesting is that Sav-On Drugs ' sign be added above the Kids R Us sign to facili- tate this awkward situation, as well as to avoid a possi- ble legal battle between the City and our major tenants, i.e. , Sav-On Drugs and Kids R Us. 2716 OCEAN Wtk DOIA EVARL POST OFFICE HUX 2U4 :iMN"IA MONICA. CALIrORNIA 90400 2131450-0779, FAX 2131452-9134 -MAY 11 '90 17: 13 COMMERICAL DEVELOP. P. Ms. Connie Brockway City of Huntington Beach May' l l , 1990 Page 2 (4) This shopping center has- more than the normal number of major tenants which requires additional sign space. For example , Michael ' s has been added as a major tenant and they need exposure on the sign pylon, as well . Based upon the above, we hope the City Council will be sympathetic to the issues we have highlighted in this letter. A separate letter is forthcoming from Sav-On Drug Stores , Inc. Very truly yours , HUNTINGTON BEACH No. 1 , a Calif. limited partnership By: WATT COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC. , a California corporation (Its General Partner) By L27AA� ARUN PHAWSTIS Its Assistant Vice President AP/smb AP15/140 cc: Mr. John W. Hunter, Jr. , Watt Commercial Dev. Co. Ms. Janet S . Segal , watt Commercial. Properties, Inc . Ms . Wendy Campbell, Watt Management Company CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH VkV2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK June 12, 1990 Mr. Ron Phadnis Watt Commercial Development Corporation 2716 Ocean Park Blvd. #1007 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Dear Mr. Phadnis: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held June 4, 1990, continued decision on the closed public hearing relative to Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 to the next regular City Council meeting of June 18, 1990. Sincerely yours , lGlyC� ;✓�z06-4,-z Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:cs CC: City Administrator City Attorney Community Development Director Constance Nicholson (Te!e phon e: 714-536-5227) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH i s 2000 MAIN STREET , ,CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK June 12, 1990 h 4 Mr. Ron Phadnis Watt Commercial Development Corporation 2716 Ocean Park Blvd. #1007 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Dear Mr. Phadnis: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held June 4, 1990, continued decision on the closed public hearing relative to Special Sign Permit No. 90-1 to the next regular City Council meeting of June 18, 1990. Sincerely yours, Connie Brockway l City Clerk CB:cs CC: City Administrator City Attorney Community Development Director Constance Nicholson 5 .Al i '(Telephone 7174536-5227f �� i Office of the City Clerk , �J. City of Huntington Beach - r . .r; � � �r Address , ,. • ,: .. P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 � ❑P�3ved Leh p " isctif„csf i lac �' h r� yint 9, C3 A' initials ., , \ 'Oute%j umoe' r. Ron Phadnis Commercial Development Corp. eu,a�as C6Z Park Boulevard #1007 to a, CA 901 j' p