Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSSP 89-5-Approved as amended D. D. Dunlap Co Inc-HH Mall 7>� ��o •3S C/i_5_hd G,. j D. D. DUNLAP COMPANIES 3b91 Long Beach Boulevard 4ong Beach, California 90807 c Phone(213)424-8191 =� - - -- - - June Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach 200 Main Street i Huntington Beach, CA. :;E: PUBL:0 F.E-1Rh/= ;TFIV -07-HUNTIAIGTON HARBOUR MALE. SIGN PER/1,11T Honorable Mayor and Councilmember: i We respectfully request a continuance of the above-mentioned matter, now scheduled for your council meeting of June 18th, to the council meeting scheduled for July 16th. We have not been able to meet with all the relevant parties with whom we need to discuss this issue. We feel that another 30 days will give us the time needed to arrange these meetings. In addition, the description of the sign given in the staff report needs to be amended to reflect the sign approved by the mall merchants. We will clarify this matter with staff such that the staff report for the July 16th meeting will reflect the merchants approved sign copy. Your consideration in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, HU lNr3'I O HARBOUR MALL ;�� hn J. o s ice Pr i ent Real Es a Division JJM:ms cc: Mayor Mayes Councilman Bannister Councilman Silva Tom Rogers 11 - 90 t,-pr�S�" August 1, 1990 () Memo to: lluntington Beach City Council Members az , From: Malta Circle home Owners �a-, d4-x-�a-'ecf S- O Re: Conditions under which we will not speak against Special Sign Permit, applicant : DD Dunlap Co. and HH Mall Merchants Association. Attached are copies of the agreements reached between the applicant and the Malta Circle Property Owners at our meeting of July . 30th. Also attached are copies of the configuration of our street to the triangle where the existing sign lives. Should you decide to allow the sign to be elevated to 16' or any other combination or configuration these are the minimal things that would give us a little relief from the impact of guch a sign. We have just received the information that the two large trees within the triangle have suffered a bad infestation of mites. The bugs have departed but the prognosis of the trees i.s unknown at this time. This should bring the Parkway Maintenance Agreement between the Dunlap Co. and the City into prompt attention and allow us to request that those trees be monitered and given special care. Shoul.A they die then they should be replaced with 36" box trees or larger if there is enough space to r.ep.lant them. We have not discussed this with the Dunlap Company because we only found out about the trees yesterday. This packet is submitted to you to bring you up to date on the negotiations between its and the Ma11 and hopefully save a lot of repetition from the podium at the public hearing. The packet will include the following: 1 . Letter. to John Moss outlining the items agreed upon at our meeting of. July 30• 2. His confirmation of: the above. 3. Copy of Malta Circle and affected areas. 4. Copy of sketch showing where the requested fencing and cut outs for redwood planters are located. 5. Signatures of property owners on Malta Circle attesting to the above. 1 ` PUG 02 '90 14:40 I!. U. DUI CGS. I HC• i 405 P02 i July 31 , 1990 Mr. John J . Moss Vice President ' D.D. Dunlap Companies j 3591 Long Beach Boulevard Long Beach, Ca 90807 Re : Conditions of approval Special Sign Permit 89-5 Dear John, As a result of our meeting of July 30, please confirm that we are all in agreement on the following conditions. 1 . Additional landscaping in the triangle to screen and block 1 out light from the proposed sign emitLing onto the hooves on Malta Circle. 2. 'Turn the sign off at 10:00PM. 3. Provide additional four foot redwood fence screening (total I of 8 on arterials) approximate 200 feet (along side of trianggle) and then for the remaining wall, - up to Davenport to add identieal additional redwood planters, one within each 451 span, a total of three planters, providing the city will allow. 4. Reverse the sign to a majority blue background'. 5. Maintain Malta Circle side of fence. f 6 . The proposed sign is not to be erected until all of the above in done first and approved by the appropiate agencies. 7 . Plant the necessary trees in the space between the triangle � and the redwood planter looking toward PCH as requested by Mr, Winger. I 8 . Produce necessary verbage into Parkway Maintenance AgteemenL- to allow the sign to be turned off if the above conditions are not ma Lntained. u►ltil such time as they are corrected. (to be prepared with instructions from City Attorney 's Office) . Please lend a confirming letter so that I may attach it to toy copy and subibit both to the City Council so that they will know What agreements have been reached. � ,Cprdial ,Tube Economakos 17031 Malta Circle . Huntington Beach, CA 92649 lde hereby accept and agree to the above outlined conditions for sign approval - Permit 89-5 as propsed by the r sidents of Malta Circle and represented by June Economakos . Cozette Dunlap , Vice President D . D. Dunlap Companies , Lnc . DBA Hunt inpton Harbour Mai t Horiz. l• = 40' ©.The existinq block wall olonq Warner C U R V E D A TA Scale Avenue adjacenl to Lot /9 will be Curve IQ d /24°56'43' Verf. / = 4 raised to the heighf established bg Curb R - -M..0' T • 38.38' L 43-61' . the City Enqineer offer rough grading Cur ve 2Q ' d ° 63'37'14:5' Curb R ° 30.0' T- Z6.83' L - 43.76' 62''0 /6" L R 22.0' T- 19.24' L = 31.62' k; .. . Curve Q 34°56' 43' _ 40.0' .T- 12.59' L - f4.40' ,\� e\F 2 I_ W Ck Curb L k - 60,03/ 5T5r29.9/' 0�0 �� - 27'16'59' yt 0 L R = 68.0' 6T 16.50' L - 32.36' r. Curve 4 A - 34'24'41° 1 Norlh Curb . R- = /400 T .43.35' L 64.08' 9 R - ./20.0' T• 37.16' L =.7Z.07.........-- South Curb ' R-- ,/00-V' T- 30.97' L - 60.06' a a't Q�Q Gp / / \ F Z R. 9f.0' T- 28.49' 'L - 55.26' 9 .ri " Mizil Top'.'.d I l! j j � 't� : p I� r3 Ex : TO.6r \ g / \p\0 Exit cE fence (Ui SECT/ON ExrJt..Power // ,; c N O'49`2P°W •//7.9/' 4•�. .,1.0° x. 6 { fx/st. Tel. AVI Y� 7�- ...... ': ... _ ?.; �� r 5 58 -••.:: �Ott : k I ' - /Zl �' _ © � `) `' `�V 17 COnJZ. S.U.H 'v3 13 •� 3 �,) h $ 7 t 30.20 ro 5 u� W /Oh a'i ,y :w' a' ,:,� ^:.:w / r:. ;•rs r �, M A L.77A C/R C L E W , j ,�V w:, 7/ r s.:+ =.i:•..,3,:, :b'•d4 r. .Yri.'L .?��� ¢ 1, s' 4 ,^a, t 77.B9 t 05.20_^ To Sta._7 dx3:, w' _ 4 � .� �� X` '�T't'3 \ t_ _... �.,. .! .- - �_ _ _ _ ....z �, .'•S_� r: J DAVENPORT DR.''o� -`� 's. +yam > 'F -'{t.,. .�f,�r °%� �'i., -t'' r ,.4!c .w ,1. +¢' zt. --- '`� _a° .± '...� $..•,_ s "` k,. :7�}� j ,,P 'A,,N ° t>• 'Ss �, • .r�. �., 4,. .�[See Al. f Leff,, r , ., w �} �•i41 ..t'i sa. 4r,.i -Y',�i.. _ 1 I{ �n4{/_ '� .G. i ) XYewt3.i•'t' Ce :SS• .W .sr.m 1 '•+s •.G, J.^:i % I l; .,(' 4'i:g. _i.. �.£' *,. �'h - a. R. v;,....•r v^�... 'a ,Iz.vi.,e.,.�;:,:i �S''r-^e+:L�•_ - [ ... . 1 w �F'. V• L ......- Las, ?s` .-,e,�'eYEk 4, _ ti •,,, 1 i..,Y:.. .. .. � s. �.a,a✓r��-a<'--;�'.r{_s %';�•y�.•:.:ir.•-. tL-:xr•.::u•.�:.a.r s.s.:.•.•,:�-r...-r_J.•c��:iri--^_a.,n '._u-..... .._... _ :W <.,v, .>. ';�. K: PREPARED,UNDER THE SUPERYIStON OV DATEy r;_ r REF.E-REN�CE� -: _ STI 2 T� SE E y ,e948 /27/ a t r ` �I xfi ,4r JC � x,+ .DRAWN BY S. giEd(ED �:. REDDMIMENDED TA., ,fix^.�;�., i'-:x - c .� •- _ _ _ -_ - 3 L.. a r ., i w Amm APPP 1/� T r.nT'�"'';•-al.<...,.-a�...r.:--..._ -r�.:::,e.at C.._.- _. .. -_�1...� - r j �•�, v 7 �, MY• .:.�.•;�' _..._... r _..•.�.x•.,+s—+si3::• ..._C s:+Y'-'_.:l Xt3io.,��'fgt•b`«.�:;;:sr:? x::�.,cw'�,:'•sihzS`,Y^�'i'�+'�- .Ctw t,•�:'f',�rota;'d�g.�'y.;` e.;rS+. ;c: At . 2 1 , . ... . . . .. - •- 4"xS"x15" 1S�euc 4'-to" 3: a B' 69' 7S' 45' i i T 7T i a••t• 4' S' Sib - -. �� ;, - ---- — 45, F 45' IV' 28' Sco��E �"=S� ✓aancv� � i August 1, 1990 This st comfir the terms and conditions outlined in our letter to John oss dated July 31, 1990. It also serves as authorization for the mat al t be elivered to the City Council Meeting of August 6. RO ERT & SU ANN E PAULA FULLMER 16991 Malta Ci cle 17041 Malta Circle Not Available-out of area 17001 MlAa BAI�I && WINGER a to irc e 51 Malta Circle 54A GLORIA JENNI S ACK & SHIRLEY LEVERENZ 17011 Malta ircle 17071 Malta Circle GUS WANDA STILES -- --- BOB & DELORES CROOKS 17021 Malta Circle - 17101 Malta Circle a PETE & JUNE ECONOMAKOS 17031 Malta Circle July 24 , 1.990 Mr.' . John J . Moss Vice President D . D. Dunlap Companies 3591 Long Beach Boulevard Long Beach, CA 90807 Dear John : In response to your letter of July 12, 1990 and as promised in our meeting on July 16, 1990, we have discovered that you have made promises that you may or- may not. be able to fulfill . Mr . D . Smith (Public Works, Parks Fy. Recreation) has advised us that no planting can be done until a plan is submitted and approved showing the location and types of trees to be added . They cannot interfere with existing walkways and must be aesthetically pleasing to the public . Mr . J . Miller (City Engineer) was appraised of four alternatives to increasing the height of the existing wall (approximately 190 feet) : 1. . Add additional courses of block . 2 . Attach a 4 foot wood extension to the existing wall. 3. Build a new 8 foot block wall in front of the existing wall . 4 . Remove the existing wallend install. a new 8 foot block wall . S . Install a free standing 4 foot wood fence adjacent to the existing wall (bottom at same elevation as the top of the existina wall ) . Ili :-1 dr�pa►- t wall I.(] Rupporr. r- i th,-r i r-.4.-n /I nr. 5 hint woiii1.d ttrgn•rl the approval of Planning, Maintc nan( e, and Parks & Recreation . The maintenance could probably he mitigated by including it in your existing maintenance agreement with the city . The city recently installed an 8 foot block wall for about $70 per foot . We fer__1 very strongly that the wall. height must be increased because as trees grow the lower foliage disappears and you end up wi. th a 6-8 foot trunk . This is evidenced by the existing pepper. t..,:ee . Also there is no assurance that one or more of the trees will not die and be replaced by a small tree . We wish to thank you for arranging to have the lighting turned of.f. at 1.0 : 00 p. m . I i Unless you include the above conditions as part of the sign permit with the stipulation that the sign will not be erected until the landscaping and wall improvements are in place, we will do everything in our power to prevent any changes to the existing sign . Please let us know what action you plan to take . Sincerely : COPY OF LETTER WRITTEN BY JACK LEYERENZ WHICH WAS THE BASIS FOR OUR MEETING OF JULY 30TH ' D. D. DUNLAP COMPANIES 3591 Long Beach Boulevard Long Beach, California 90807 July 12, 1990 Phone(213)424-8191 Mr. and Mrs. Pete Economakas 17031 Malta Circle Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Economakas: I was very pleased to hear that you had reached an agreement with the Huntington Harbour Merchants Association with regard to our proposed sign. As per Dean Zitko and Jack Price, you have agreed not to object to our new directory sign provided we provide the following: 1 ) Extend existing fence in those areas necessary to screen out light from the directory sign to your homes on Malta Circle. 2) Plant additional trees as another screening barrier and agree not to trim existing trees. 3) Turn off lighting on the sign at 10:00 p.m. This letter shall serve to inform you that we agree to approve the aforementioned services, provided we receive approval from the City Council at their meeting, Monday, July 16th. We shall so indicate to the Council at that time. If you have any questions with regard to our sign or if the above does not truly represent your understanding as per your meeting with Dean and Jack, please call me; otherwise, 'we will proceed to the Council meeting with our understanding to be as stated in this letter. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated by all the merchants of the Huntington Harbour Mall. We hope we can continue to be good neighbors; as such, please call me at any time with your suggestions on improving any existing condition pertaining to the mall. Sincerely, Jc HFeP T- GN A SOUR MALL JoMos, :•Vi (ident cc: Dean Zitko Acquisitirfs & Development Jack Price d CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK August 9, 1990 D. D. Dunlap Companies 3591 Long Beach Blvd. Long Beach, CA 90807 Attn: John J. Moss The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting . held Monday, August 6, 1990, granted your appeal regarding Special Sign Permit 89-5 as amended. Please contact Mike Adams, Director of Community Development for an explanation of these amendments. • Vv"" Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:bt Enc. (Telephone: 714-536.5227) APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL' eJ sr_ o RE�U_ ST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION a. a.Q. CITY CLERKDate June 18, 1990 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administratorr� Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Developmen Subject: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S' DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 89-5 ON (o&196( hoConsistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Excep on' —�� Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE• Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by D.D. Dunlap Companies, Inc. to the Planning Commission' s denial of Special Sign Permit No. 89-5, a request to modify an existing off-site sign for the Huntington Harbour Mall located on the northwest corner of Warner and Algonquin Street . RECOMMENDATION• Motion to "Uphold the Planning Commission' s action and deny the appeal of Special Sign Permit No. 89-5" . Planning Commission Action Taken On March 20, 1990: A MOTION WAS MADE BY MOUNTFORD, SECOND BY WILLIAMS, TO DENY SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 89-5, WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Moungford, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED ANALYSIS• Findings for Denial : 1. Strict compliance with Section 9610.5 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code will not result in a substantial hardship to the applicant . The existing center is located 500 feet north of the nearest arterial highway, Warner Avenue, however, not permitting modification to a sign off-site will not result in the commercial center not having the exposure to vehicular traffic required to attract customers. r ! P10 5/85 2. The proposed sign is unsightly and will be detrimental to properties in the vicinity. The height, area and location of the sign are not compatible with adjacent properties. 3 . The proposed sign is oversized and will obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and poses a hazard. 4 . The proposed sign contains an excessive number of tenant panels and may be distracting and hazardous to passing motorists . Alternatives to Recommendation: 1. Motion to "Approve the appeal and overturn the Planning Commission' s action on Special Sign Permit No. 89-5 ' as modified by staff with findings and conditions of approval" (Design Review Board Recommendation) . 2 . Motion to "Approve the appeal and overturn the Planning Commission' s action on Special Sign Permit 89-5 as requested by the applicant with findings and conditions of approval" . The existing sign is a 6 foot by 14 foot (84 square feet) internally illuminated monument sign on a 2 foot base (8 feet high total) . The sign has 21 individual tenant identification signs as well as a center identification panel on the top. The original proposed modifications to the existing sign included replacing the center identification panel with six additional tenant identification panels (27 total) and the construction of a 50 square foot internally illuminated center identification panel above the existing sign. Additionally, a space frame structure was to be constructed around the entire _sign to match the architecture of Huntington Harbour Mall . The maximum height of the proposed sign was to be 16 feet and would-- have had a total sign area of 134 square feet. Since the Planning Commission' s denial of Special Sign Permit 89-5, the applicant has modified the request. Although the height and area of the proposed sign have not changed (16 feet and 134 square feet respectively) , the proposed sign now consists of three tenant panels, two panels would be "Major Tenant" signs of 21 square feet each with the other being a 42 square foot changeable copy panel featuring various groups of tenants on a monthly basis . The proposed sign still has a 50 square foot internally illuminated center indentification panel above the tenant panels . Staff has heard testimony that a sign of the size proposed may interfere with intersection visibility. Additionally, a number of the neighbors who live on Malta Circle spoke at the Planning Commission Hearing in opposition to the request. In general terms, they were concerned that a larger sign would have an negative impact on their properties as they could already see the existing sign from their second story bedroom windows . Staff believes that concerns with proposed sign are valid and that the signs as proposed should not be approved. Rather, staff would recommend that a modified version of the sign, as recommended by the Design Review Board should be approved instead. A description of that modified version is as follows . RCA - 6/18/90 -2- (5991d) Design Review Board Status : On February 1, 1990, staff presented the proposed sign to the design Review Board for the purpose of making a recommendation to the Planning Commission. Several alternatives were discussed. The Design Review Board approved a modified version of the proposed sign in which the sign would have a 2 foot base, a 2 foot by 10 foot (20 square feet) internally illuminated display area allowing 2 tenant identification panels as well as directional information, and the center identification sign area done in space frame only (no internal illumination) a maximum of 6 feet high. The sign would have a total height of 10 feet. The top portion of the sign would be illuminated by external light sources only. This sign configuration is attached to this report as Alternative A (Attachment 3) . Environmental Status : The proposed project is categorically exemp pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3, of the California Environmental Quality Act. FUNDING SOURCE: N/A ATTACHMENTS. 1. Area Map. 2. Reduced elevation of. applicant ' s request . 3 . Design Review Board Recommendation (Alt. A) . 4 . Minutes of March 20, 1990- and March 6, 19.90 Planning Commission meetings. 5. Planning Commission staff report dated March 21,- 1990 . 6. Applicants letter of appeal dated March 28, 1990 . 7. Planning Commission recommendation and findings for denial . 8. Alternative #1 findings and conditions of approval. 9 . Alternative #2 findings and conditions of approval. MTU:MA:TR:kjl RCA - 6/18/90 -3- (5991d) f WR-CZ-FP2 AVE `- Q ie O CHR RR2 qq ISTDW4 Bro NSOI0000 W F g R3 2'.�Ya64�t**, 'CgEa.71 N 39•i0'i7-E ST.l2 CF_E , R2 R2 R2 IT C4 , "E,f Of .V1. of RI-CZ A. CF-R r H Y IIN STAR G E RI-CZ z? R\ �' - �'vRA OR J 0 PICKWICK C" WRCZ-FP2 J� ^ iYa'IVIAFM:7al_ r WSrA OR BRANFOR Cry Z NCE R. 1. RI-CZ j 0' oa• ? CF-R Y x a ,P�'� R 3 R2 R2 R2 R2 WANKSTR ti e 3 RI• Z ij N \ G� a = v R2 - R2') wR-C2iP2 O • .....•i a . t0!!/07l . :::. _ R2 ° - _ _._° RI-CZ ` G� d .}I A R2 ST. rI A R\� OP my Iriiida7fja'4i RCE SCALE '-IM rC[T RI-CZ N �1 I a ORLE DR. / 51`IMPN 43 i R\- R2 R2 R2 R2 R2 R2 R3 �l RI-CZ U i �3 pA RI-CZ Q euT-L c tauaE RI-CZ l u RI-cZ RI"cZ C4-CZ I MILD ST. k37°°•RI-cz IDAV NPDRT =N 0 R� R3 R3 = R3N OR J Y �U1m L �J U 3 WIL 4CSM DR.q C U RI-CZ= 9l N ---- -;.aRl �} WESTPO"T g Rf flI•CZ a J 3 3».a[ .w.oT( in YI- RI-C2 „I Sf 'd 'd C1110 6 R I-CZ 3 RI-C g N N R 3 a R3 -CZ RI-CZ �? R3 R3 �,f R3 R3 C4' jx / C E ATER R 2 " C R2 l R3-19 1 J YES C RING Cw WR-CZ-FP2 2FP RI-CZ s C2 (/` �,.iz[ i •ir.AT1ERLY BAr N U RI RI U I R. _ R3 a �► R I-CZ3 WR-CZ-FP2 I ••• R I R I ALADDIN DR. HUNTINGTON HARBOR �'�'V n = ///; o RI-CZ RI-CZ RI-CZ BAY CLUB SPECIFIC PLAN/, CDUata Y E�\ A RI-CZ C R1 SEAPPIE CR. Q N Rt-CZ .� RI-CZ - RI-CZ RI .m WARNER AVE. SSP89-05 HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION as COLORATION �/; 1•,'D•Sit r s _ _ ;O.{� {-- BACKGROUND COPY BORDER IS"Lfrral': IN -7 IOII . PINSTRIPE LOGOIARTWORK II tvrvw.S 710" I0 0�/ SPfC/AI INSTRUCTIONS HARBOUR 16'0" IS"�GtFlj �dawoE z" tp HH WP E. MA+'1e TYPE STYLE (v MALL QUANTITY srN(ar nousrr ceDrRS IACt IACI — pllE �( a►�M _ LtrasB. _ �_ Is"rb vll.f..Q SPECIFICATIONS bilmeMATERIALS (.06/Tf 1JUt/'/ MARKET 11111GG67I & I.,Ltu MA•of. ._1 DIMENSIONS -- I SIZES OAltVtR SIGN vosr Join-,Us!.-'Boat-Parade-of.-Lights"-Sale THICKNESS .. .... DEC -8-23 !' Merry Christmas! -Si WAC4 DATE SULFA II I ,r DESCRIPTION OPTION Y q 'P(tO T-D ADDICr " ANT) NcW This document contains proprietary Routed 6 Sandblasted L)� �I- I� /4 - I O c�Ir�N -i�I;lam ON '�rCl DTI N[T DENMAN Wood Signs DESIGNED BY are information which shah not be repro- n O: Iv�nN u ME n1 S1G N j duced, bans/erred to other docu- G Cloth 1ZyOl SALESPERSON .y $1g/1 Gnphtcs AothBaing I,-V CHECKED Bill INGNAMEANDADDRESS REVISION / Tents,disclosed t0 others,used for "-x- -P to NJ L_^-P cp/K a 1 E Painted Signs FZILK" •PO. .o� -7cJ b� �. manufacturing or any other purpose (?14) 557-7440 L N ,,_>� IL: u BInICONiACr R(! without the written authorization 3.0 Letters ,JO+�!J MOS NAME AND ADDRESS IOB NUMBER 2940 Grace Ln.,•Bldg.F N n1Ti Na-ro N H><IZR-X Q /VNA L L from Denman Sign&Graphics. Costa Mesa,CA 92g16 Custom Oesigm cusroMIRAPPRovu crtlw6��ovN�c AEEmnkk Alnl NT.acii_cA . • jai�„��� I , OR C7 • � I 3 � rn z ni _. Lr MALL O TE N A.1\IT- �f1. Tc N /ANT^ -WD" k � DIRC' MvNA,— TN1=c� oN�—Y 2 Al4w a B-2 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO 89-5 (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 6 . 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT D. D. DUNLAP COMPANIES, INC. i LOCATION: Northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Algonquin Street Special Sign Permit No. 89-5 is a request to modify an existing off-site sign for Huntington Harbour Mall located at the northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Algonquin Street . On March 6, 1990, the Planning Commission continued Special Sign Permit No. 89-5 to allow the applicant and staff the opportunity to arrive at an alternative that was satisfactory to the Planning Commission, staff and the applicant . Further, the Commission provided direction that the proposed sign should come closer to complying with Code. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15303 , Class 3 , of the California Environmental Quality Act . STAFF . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 as recommended by the Design Review- Board with findings and conditions of approval . THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED John Moss, Dunlap Co. , was present to answer any questions from the Planning Commission. He said a screening of trees would be added between the sign and adjacent homes to avoid any visual impacts to the neighborhood. He further stated that business identification was greatly needed by the tenants in the center . There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. The Commission felt that the number of tenants in the center requiring identification were so numerous that to 'include all of them on the sign would cause a visual distraction to passing motorists . They also felt that the recommendation made by the Design Review Board would be the best possible solution. They again suggested that the applicant contact staff to reach an agreement on the design of the sign. .!I t PC Minutes - 3/20/90 -8- (5627d) A MOTION WAS MADE BY MOUNTFORD, SECOND BY WILLIAMS, TO DENY SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 89-5, WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: j AYES: Shomaker, Mountford, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . Strict compliance with Section 9610 . 5 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code will not result in a substantial hardship to the applicant. The existing center is located 500 feet north of the nearest arterial highway, Warner Avenue, however, not permitting a sign off-site will not result in the commercial center not having the exposure to vehicular traffic required to attract customers . 2 . The proposed sign is unsightly and will be detrimental to properties in the vicinity. The height, area and location of the sign are not compatible with adjacent properties . 3 . The proposed sign is oversized and will obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and poses a hazard. 4 . The proposed sign contains an excessive number of tenant panels and may be distracting and hazardous to passing motorists . =3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-6/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90- PPLICANT: NATIONAL EQUESTRIAN CENTERS, INC. LOCA N: 18381 Golden West Street Conditional Use rmit No . 90-6 is a request to mit the expansion of 80 corrals (pad ks) , 20 box stalls , 4 ar " s, and addition to Barn #4 within an exi ng equestrian cent pursuant to Sections 9101(d) (1) and 9630 and icle 967 of t Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The equest n cente , located within Huntington Central Park, has been in oper io since 1983 . Expansion of the facilities will allow an increa n the number of horses from 335 to 435 . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the ironmental regula 4 ons 'in e ct at this time, the Departmen f Community Development advertise raft Negative Declaratio o . 90-10 for twenty-one (21) days, and bal comments -J PC Minutes - 3/20/90 -9- (5627d) FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-66 : f 1 . Due to design deficiencies the proposed four unit condominiu will be incompatible with adjacent properties and uses . 2 . ue to design deficienciefr the proposed four unit cond inium w 1 be detrimental to th6 general welfare of person orking or siding in the vicinity. 3 . The to ion, site layout, and design of the pr posed four unit condomini does not properly adapt the' propo ed structures to streets, d 'veways, and other adjacent stru ures and uses in a harmonious ma er . 4 . The access to an arking for the pro sed four unit condominium will c ate parking and raffic problems . FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - SPECI PERMIT 1 . The requested special perms do not promote a better living environment by adapting t ntown Specific Plan requirements to better suit a four u con inium. 2 . The special permits 11 be detrime tal to the general health, welfare, safety a convenience, and etrimental or injurious to the value of operty or improvemen '- of the neighborhood 4 and the City i general . i i' 4 . The specia permits are inconsistent with th bjectives of the Downtown pecific Plan standards in achieving evelopment which ' adapted to the existing terrain and wil e inco atible with the surrounding environment. FINDI FOR DENIAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-456 : 1. Due to its design, the four unit condominium project is too intense for this site location (on a 50 foot lot) and is inconsistent with -the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. B-7 SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 89-5 APPLICANT: D. D. DUNLAP COMPANIES, INC. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Algonquin Street Special Sign Permit No. 89-5 is a request to modify an existing off-site sign for Huntington Harbour Mall . . The sign is located in a landscaped planter in the public right-of-way at the northwest } corner of Warner Avenue and Algonquin Street. PC Minutes - 3/6/90 -17- (5725d) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15303 , Class 3 , of the California Environmental Quality Act . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: �r - Approve Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 as recommended by the Design Review Board with findings and conditions of approval . THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED John Moss , Vice-President of Dunlap Co . , spoke in support of his original proposal and urged the Commission to approve. He said they are proposing to incorporate awnings and space frame with the existing sign to lessen the hardship of tenants in the center that have no visibility and wants to beautify the landscaping strip. He said he opposes the recommendation made by the Design Review Board. Jim Evans, 3626 E. 7th Street, Long Beach, said he has recently taken over maintenance of the parkway landscaping and feels it has greatly improved and beautified the site. Cozette Thalman, Representative from the Merchant ' s Association, said she represents the 30 tenants in the center and they need more visibility. She said since the residents are concerned with illumination that plans have been made to put signs on a meter to shut off automatically at 10 : 00 PM. She feels the space frame and awnings will be an improvement . Jack Leverenz, 17071 Malta Circle, spoke in opposition to the proposed sign. He feels the sign should only contain directional information. He said the existing. sign was a mistake and urged the Commission to not make another. He said the existing sign is clearly visible to all residents and also feels the west wall should be raised for protection to the residents . R. E. Stiles, 17021 Malta Circle, urged denial of the proposed sign and said the mall is used primariy by local residents and does not feel there should be any directional signs on Warner Avenue and that most of the adjacent neighbors also object to an additional sign height of 8 to 10 feet . June Economakas, 17051 Malta Circle, presented photographs of problems being .caused by the existing sign. She said the sign has everything possible on it and feels the height and location is detrimental to adjacent homes . She feels the lights will shine directly into the master bedrooms of two story homes and says from the second story residents can see the sign. She also feels traffic safety will be impacted by the sign. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. �.. ` PC Minutes - 3/6/90 -18- (5725d) The Commission felt that denial of the proposed sign might cause a loss of opportunity to improve the existing sign and that the Design i Review Board . recommendation was the best . A continuance was suggested to allow the applicant and staff the opportunity to arrive i at an alternative that was satisfactory to the Planning Commission, staff and the applicant . Furtkle r, the Commission provided direction that the proposed sign should dome closer to complying with Code. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WILLIAMS, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, TO CONTINUE SPECIAL SIGN- PERMIT NO. 89-5 TO THE MARCH 20, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Williams , Ortega, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: Shomaker, Mountford ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C. CONSENT CALENDAR C-1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED JANUARY 9 AND JANUARY 23 , 1990 A MO ON WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY MOUNTFORD, TO APPROV k PLANN COMMISSION MINUTES DATED JANUARY 9 AND JANUARY 23 , 990, AS SUBMITT BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES:. S aker, Mountford, Williams, Ortega, Kirk nd, Bou uignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-2 RESOLUTION NO 1428 • RTEN REVIEW PERIODS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS P ED PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No . 428, designating t Director of the Department of Commu ' y Development as the pe on authorized to request shortened view periods for environme al documents prepared pursuan to the California Environmenta uality Act (CEQA) . C Minutes - 3/6/90 -19- (572 ) 3 huntington beach department of community development STa f f REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: March 21, 1990 SUBJECT: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 89-5 (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 6 , 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT/ D.D. Dunlap Companies , Inc. DATE ACCEPTED: PROPERTY P.Q. Box 7067 January 27, 1990 OWNER: Long 'Beach, CA 90807 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: REQUEST: Modification of an March 28, 1990 existing off-site sign for the Huntington Harbour ZONE: R3 (Medium High Mall. The sign would have Density Residential) a maximum height of 16 feet and an area of 134 GENERAL PLAN: Low Density sq. ft . including 27 tenant Residential panels . EXISTING USE: Sign located LOCATION: Northwest corner of in a landscaped planter Warner Avenue and within the public right-of- Algonquin Street way 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 as recommended by the Design Review Board with findings and conditions of approval . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit No. 89-5 is a request to modify an existing off-site sign for Huntington Harbour Mall located at the northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Algonquin Street . On March 61 1990, the Planning Commission continued Special Sign Permit No. 89-5 to allow the applicant and staff the opportunity to arrive at an alternative that was satisfactory to the Planning Commission, staff and the applicant . Further, the Commission provided direction that the proposed sign should come closer to complying with Code. Since the Code does not contain development standards for off-site signs, it is difficult to determine which standards to apply. Any sign of any size at the proposed location requires Planning Commission approval of a special sign permit. A-F M-23C At the time of writing this report, the applicant has not presented staff with any new proposals . One possible alternative the Commission may wish to consider would be to adopt the sign dimensions recommended by the Design Review Board ' s recommendation, yet allow the center identification portion on top of the sign to be internally illuminated in lieu of space frame. Additionally, the space frame surrounding the structure could be eliminated . This sign configuration would have a maximum height of 9 feet, a center identification panel of approximately 40 square feet, and 20 square feet of tenant and directional information (see Attachment No . 1) . 3 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 as recommended by the Design Review Board with the findings and . conditions of approval contained in the March 6, 1990 staff report (attached) . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Alternative B 2 . Staff report dated March 6, 1990 HS:TR:kla Staff Report - 3/21/90 -2- (5119d) i:�Vf �-r I f 1� I I HH MALL �! TE N�-ICI TTN IN N � k D I P C,,--Ti o N A i X N r--c.> o W 4.- 6 r � A Oki V # a a: from the desk of: CONNIE BROCKWAY, CMC CITY CLERK . (714) 536-5404 S Tom, ` You wrote a memo stating you had verified addresses off your parcel book and yet 31 i when these came back and were checked the parcel address book—was not used. � . I am requesting that you verify the entire mailing and also be sure there was no map changes in lot splits. Please do this today. Connie P.S. Also copy of Title Company's t statement of accuracy. f P.O. BOX 190 I .; i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 V i SraFF huntington beach department of community development REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: March 6, 1990 SUBJECT: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 89-5 APPLICANT/ D.D. Dunlap Companies , Inc. DATE ACCEPTED: PROPERTY P.O. Box 7067 January 27, 1990 OWNER: Long Beach, CA 90807 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE : REOUEST: Modification of an March 28, 1990 existing off-site sign for the Huntington Harbour ZONE: R3 (Medium High Mall . The sign would have Density Residential) a maximum height of 16 feet and an area of 134 GENERAL PLAN: Low Density sq. ft . including 27 tenant Residential panels . EXISTING USE: Sign located LOCATION: Northwest corner of in a landscaped planter Warner Avenue and within the public right-of- Algonquin Street way 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 as recommended by the Design Review Board with findings and conditions of approval . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 is a request to modify an existing off-site sign for Huntington Harbour Mall . The sign is located in a landscaped planter in the public right-of-way at the northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Algonquin Street. 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R3 (Medium High Density Residential) LAND USE: Public right-of-way AIR&Sam un A-FM-23C sm Ag"Wte4lf z r North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Medium High Density ZONE : R3 (Medium High Density Residential) LAND USE : Multi family dwellings East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential ZONE: R3 (Medium High Density Residential) LAND USE: Multi family dwellings South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE : R3/R2 (Medium High/Medium Density Residential) LAND USE: Multi family dwellings West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone) LAND USE: Single family dwellings 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15303 , Class 3 , of the California Environmental Quality Act . 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable . 8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Background• Huntington Harbour Mall is located on the northwest corner of Algonquin Street and Davenport Drive. This site is approximately 500 feet from Warner Avenue, the nearest arterial highway to the center, and is oriented in such a manner that visibility from Warner Avenue is impossible. The center ' s location resulted from the anticipated Route 1 Freeway and Warner off-ramp which was being planned by the State at the time the center was constructed. If the proposed freeway would have been constructed, the center would have Staff Report - 3/6/90 -2- (4969d) r been located adjacent to the Warner Avenue off-ramp and would have had adequate exposure to the anticipated traffic volumes . The State, however, deleted the proposed freeway leaving the center on a residential collector street which does not provide adequate exposure. The Planning Commission originally approved the existing location of the off-site sign through Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 76-05 . In 1985 , the subject sign was demolished by an automobile. The sign, in its existing configuration, was approved through Special Sign Permit No . 86-8 . A condition of that approval was that the applicant execute a Parkway License Agreement with the City to maintain the landscaped planter where the sign is located . Said agreement was approved by the City Council on May 20, 1987 . Project Description/Discussion: The existing sign is a 6 feet by 14 feet (84 square feet) internally illuminated monument sign on a 2 foot base (8 feet high total) . The sign has 21 individual tenant identification signs as well as a center identification panel on the top. The proposed modification to the existing sign includes replacing the center identification panel with six additional tenant identification panels and the construction of a 50 square foot internally illuminated center identification panel above the existing sign. Additionally, a space frame would be constructed around the entire sign to match the architecture of Huntington Harbour Mall . The maximum height of the proposed sign is 16 feet and would have a total sign area of 134 square feet . The applicant has stated that the sign modifications as proposed are required to accommodate the tenants of the new retail building and to be more representative of the new look of Huntington Harbour Mall . Staff has concerns that the addition of more individual tenant identification panels will further clutter the sign. The existing tenant identification signs are too numerous and small to be safely read from a moving automobile; adding six more will worsen the situation. Additionally, a sign of that size may interfere with the traffic signals at the intersection. The concept of making Huntington Harbour Mall the main focus of the sign, however, is desirable and has staff support . On February 1, 1990 , staff presented the proposed sign to the Design Review Board for the purpose of making a recommendation to the Planning Commission. Several alternatives were discussed. The Design Review Board approved a modified version of the proposed sign in which the sign would have a 2 foot base, a 2 foot by 10 foot (20 square feet) internally illuminated display area allowing 2 tenant identification panels as well as directional information, and the center identification sign area done in space frame only (no Staff Report - 3/6/90 -3- (4969d) i internal illumination) a maximum of 6 feet in height . The sign would have a total height of 10 feet . The top portion of the sign would be illuminated by external light sources only. This sign configuration is attached to this report as Alternative A. The applicant has submitted a letter stating the reasons that he believes that the Design Review Board ' s proposal is unacceptable. First, if space frame only (no background) is permitted for the center identification portion of the sign, the sign becomes one-way only. Those. motorists who would approach the sign from the rear would see the sign backwards . The existing sign can be read from both directions . Second, with only 20 square feet of internally illuminated signage and the space frame on top, the applicant argues that the sign would draw less attention than the existing sign. For the applicant to convince the tenants of Huntington Harbour Mall to eliminate their personal identification panels, the center visibility needs to be improved. Third, the applicant is concerned about possible liability as the sign as approved by the Design Review Board would constitute a "jungle gym" , encouraging youth to climb on the structure . Staff believes that the sign could be designed to accommodate space frame letters on both sides of the sign making -it readable from both directions . Some type of background between the two sides of the letters on the sign would be required. Staff believes that such a configuration with adequate external illumination would create adequate visibility from Warner Avenue without sacrificing public safety concerns . The problem of liability from people climbing on the sign does pose a concern. Perhaps the landscaping surrounding the sign could be designed to discourage potential climbers from approaching the sign. A possible compromise between the applicant ' s request and the Design Review Board ' s recommendation (Alternative A) would be to adopt the sign dimensions recommended by the Design Review Board, yet allow the center identification portion on top of the sign to be internally illuminated as proposed. As such, the sign would have a maximum height of 10 feet with 20 square feet of tenant and directional information on the bottom with approximately 40 square feet of center identification area on top, all internally illuminated. With this option, the City' s concerns would still be met by significantly reducing the number of tenant identification panels (2 in lieu of 21) helping to reduce the amount of information on the sign. This would be less distracting to motorists on Warner Avenue. Additionally, the focus of the sign would be Huntington Harbour Mall itself with directional information, '-which was the original intent of the off-site sign. The applicant would achieve that goal of having the sign architecturally match the newly remodeled mall and would focus the attention of the observers primarily to the mall as a whole. Staff Report - 3/6/90 -4- (4969d) 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 as recommended by the Design Review Board with the following findings and conditions of approval : FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1 . Strict compliance with Section 9610 . 5 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code will result in a substantial hardship to the applicant . The existing center is located 500 feet north of the nearest arterial highway, Warner Avenue. Not permitting a sign _off-site would result in the commercial center not having the exposure to vehicular traffic required to attract customers . 2 . The sign as' approved does not adversely affect other signs in the area . The proposed sign is a modification to an existing sign which is located by itself within a landscaped planter . 3 . The sign as approved will not be detrimental to properties in the vicinity. The height , area and location of the sign are compatible with adjacent properties . 4 . The sign as approved does not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and does not pose a hazardous distraction. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . The site plan and elevations as recommended by the Design Review Board (Alternative A) shall be the conceptually approved layout . 2 . The Parkway License Agreement between the City and the applicant shall remain in effect. 3 . The sign shall only be illuminated during the hours in which the center is open for business . In no case shall the sign be illuminated after 12 : 00 PM. 4 . The maximum number of tenants on either side of the sign shall be limited to two (2) . 5 . The existing nonconforming pole sign on the Huntington Harbour Mall site shall be removed prior to issuance of building permits . 6 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . Staff Report - 3/6/90 -5- (4969d) r 7 . Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time .as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date . 11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: A. The Planning Commission may approve Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 as approved by Design Review Board (Alternative A) with the exception of permitting the center identification portion of the sign to be internally illuminated (instead of externally illuminated space frame) with findings and conditions of approval; or B . The Planning Commission may approve Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 as submitted by the applicant with findings and conditions of approval; or C. The Planning Commission may deny Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 with findings . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Area map 2 . Narrative 3 . Reduced site plans and elevations of applicant ' s request 4 . Elevation of existing sign 5 . Alternative A (Design Review Board/Staff Recommendation) 6 . Letter from applicant dated February 23 , 1990 7 . Design Review Board minutes dated February 1, 1990 HS:TR:kla Staff Report - 3/6/90 -6- (4969d) P` �WR-CZ-FP2 ie M M �I HEIL - - - — —__ AVE-L- - L OP XY Of x50.59'S5•�R s A2V� ,R 3 CHRSTIAN4 BAt 1000043:N4.'iltf. /r x59'2017•[ 57.62 R2 R2 = C4 pR. •>,>� CF-E `�Ia[Y[R R2 CF-R _.fa., ..a.. .,.....n,- 3 R I CZ I i Y Ix STAR Gj EI' R2 Avoo" [R RI-CZ z Fl\ o A.fR.l OR •� '^WR4-CZ PICKWICK CR / J� ^ C. BRANFOfl iGy �Y1WIgJ1:M_ x[[ vIST.W RI-CZ CF-R R2 SPJ i Des:::'.'>,li iivr/n.�✓ - 'Rl- Z . R3 R2 R2 R2 = R2 R2 ' R2` I wR•CZ'fP2 (Nj \� ,ro+..�,,..... i.... ¢o - a = t?7lRZ/d>= 0 =00c RI-CZ N .. R2 R2 PEARCE VALE IN r[[T RI CZ °h ;IS �_/ pALE Dfl. AN hn Z3 i N P2 G�S,tt1M �\ a. a.Rl-CZ N W° R2 R2 R2 R2 R2 R2 R3 R I-CZ:a t aMeutt � /I 7 I a R- •FP2 OP QS�RI'CZ RI-E.Z R%-CZ NRI- I C4-CZ Al I MI _ — MILO ST. R3 522! u -R CZ W� I u >�L DAV NPORT Z I I Crugi [R RI-CZ 3 D` _ a R 3 W N N R, N = — o Rk R3 R3 r R3 C2 U. g a m 3 N y u o y I; °" ; SIGN _ � ..-- - �WINDSOR DR,G 0: 0 u RI•CZ — RI-C2 8 RI- tI • WESTPCNT �aa 3 „oxf ,v.c,[ .% > n RI-CZ J R I-CZ = ! RI-c 3 N °»f R3DIFIL r �t IIa L s R3 "R3 RY R I-CZ :Rl-CZ y R3 R3 »Oef R3 ft3 C4: cr R2 �E ATER 2 R2 R R3-1g '- �cx[s cR WR-CZ-FP2c2FP RI-CZ f sC27''° U 0 R51»[7. RI , •is ATNERLY BAY N -.- N x GR. I _ R I-CZ; WR-CZ FP2 �_ R I R 3 car�ALADDIN DR. HUNTINGTON HARBOR/ 1f o R I x BAY CLUB SPECIFIC PLAN/ ' G RI—CZ �RI-CZ u R I-CZ aTNCY �\ f cW RI-CZ RI R I-CZ / •� RI-CZ RI-CZ RI m WARNER AVE. A I . SSP89-05 >� HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION D. D. DUNLAP COMPANIES 3591 Long Beach Boulevard Long Beach, California 90807 Phone(213)424-8191 September. 5, 1989 City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 ATTN: PLANNING COMMISSION :i- RE: MONUMENT SIGN LOCATED AT ALGONQUIN AND WARNER Dear Planning Commission Members: As we draw closer to the completion of our new retail building at the Huntington Harbour Mall, it is imperative that we increase the monument signage to accommodate our future tenants. The visual merchandising provided .by an effective signage system is vital to the overall success of the shopping center; therefore, I believe you will find the size, shape, color, contrast, and proportion conforming with the existing architecture of the shopping center as well as aesthetically pleasing to the surrounding area. We look forward to receiving your consideration. Sincerely, INGTON BOUR MALL �74.operty Evans Manager JE:ms Enc. COMRi;,N':' "NT 4* • j .: . .. , F�� RED •`. . . . .• . . . lbow. Dee, in- u ' =7ntA9 tlaN U MEHT' SKt i p >f,. -�`- 10-54" I"m MONUMENT. DET.AIL @Q \ P� MALTA CIRCLE xr64, Siv1 9 /y i --ter- G!!tJl�C� ��°F-C� l�j M t IVA'fEY� •M.ON tJ r-�l at.l'( �SPIN-�( � ��� � ..p, � 3 rn 2 ' MALL O T It N /NN T^ t � f_ ! Lq 1 l- Ai4,wncls.'�— ' A J c VL 61990 D. D. DUNLAP COMPA#'!ft"c.,r of r� 0E"Z 3591 Long Beach Bouleva&'V'�`f'NV oiVIS1 �'FfVr Long Beach,California 90807 _ Phone(213)424-8191 February 23 , 1990 Mr. Tom Rogers Planning Department City.; of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 RE: PROPOSED SIGN MODIFICATION AT THE HUNTINGTON HARBOUR MALL Dear Mr. Rogers: I wanted to take exception to the recommendation of the Design Review Board with respect to our above-mentioned application. We object to their proposal for the following reasons: 1) The space frame as proposed could not- be utilized for two sided exposure. Due to the transparency of the space - frame, lettering could only be placed on one side. The sign is intended to face traffic from both directions on Warner. 2) The proposed 20 square feet of illuminated sign face would draw less attention to the center than the existing sign which has a much larger sign face. 3) We have a major concern over the safety ramifications of the Design Review Board's proposal. A space frame with maximum .height of 10 feet and minimum height of 5 feet could -become an appealing "jungle gym" for children in the area. I had addressed this concern with you previously wherein I stated that our original proposal would be engineered in such a way as to minimize unwanted and unsafe usage. In summary, we feel that our original proposal serves the purpose of identifying and attracting more customers to our center much mo—cc o t11GLia the.es Ti2$ign review Board's prC��iOSai. Since the original positioning of the center was based upon changes in street patterns which never came about, the sign now serves as our only means of identification to Warner traffic. We feel that increasing our exposure and attraction to this traffic would correlate into increased sales for our Tenants thereby increasing sales tax revenue to the City of Huntington Beach. Perhaps you could propose a solution which might better address the needs of our center as well as the City of Huntington Beach. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance. 7eal re yo s, J. oss r sident S tate Division ,T,TM!m c DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES February 1, 1990 3 : 30 p.m. Members Present : Frank Higgins , Daryl Smith, Howard Zelefsky,_ Kirk Kirkland Absent : Mark Porter Staff Present : Sergio Martinez A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-61 : Applicant: Peppers Restaurant & Nightclub Request : Review elevations for Peppers Restaurant & Golden Beach Nightclub. Location: Main Street & Pacific Coast Highway Expected Action: Recommendation to the Planning Commission Steve Toatt, Project Designer, displayed floor plans and elevations . A detailed description of the proposal followed. Clarifications and additional information was discussed. DARYL SMITH MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE PROJECT AS PROPOSED. FRANK HIGGINS SECONDED THE MOTION AND IT PASSED 4-0. B. SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 89-5: Applicant : D.D. Dunlop Companies Request : Remodel of off-site commercial center freestanding sign. Location: Northwest corner of Algonquin & Warner Expected Action: Recommendation to Planning Commission Herb Fauland, staff planner, displayed the site plan and elevations of the proposal. The subject sign is a special off-site sign for the Huntington Harbour Mall Shopping Center. Four different alternatives (identified as A, B, C, & D) were presented and discussed. Lengthy discussion followed between staff, the applicant representative and the Board. MIKE ADAMS MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE ALTERNATIVE "D" WHICH PROPOSES A SIGN WITH A TWO (2- ) FOOT BASE PLUS TWO (2- ) FEET OF DISPLAY AREA PLUS SIX (6- ) FEET OF FRAME HEIGHT FOR A TOTAL OF TEN (10) FEET MAXIMUM. AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL, THE EXISTING FREESTANDING SIGN IDENTIFYING THE CENTER IN THE PARKWAY LOT SHALL BE REMOVED. DARYL SMITH SECONDED THE MOTION AND IT PASSED 4-0. A#"I"4M4 * 7 D. D. DUNLAP COMPANIES 3591 Long Beach Boulevard Long Beach,California 90807 Phone(213)424-8191 March 28, 1990 HAND DELIVERED The City Council of Huntington Beach c/o The City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 RE: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT #89-5 To Whomever it May Concern: By this letter we hereby appeal the disapproval of our special sign permit #89-5. Our appeal is based primarily on the grounds that our shopping center will undergo undue hardship from not having adequate exposure to the nearest arterial highway, Warner Avenue. This is especially true of Tenants in our new building who have no identification to traffic whatsoever. We feel that our proposed sign represents a significant improvement in appearance. - Incorporating the elements of the space frame and awning add character -and architectural consistency to the design. We have engineered the sign such that it will not pose a hazard to pedestrian or vehicular traffic. I am enclosing with this appeal a check for $200. 00 to pay for the filing fee. Please call me at (213) 424-8191 if you should have any questions. Sincerely, TI 6'dXOUR MALL jJ�ohn rioss dice r esident 'Real Estate Division JJM:ras enc. G"n r M PLANNING COMMISSION/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Suggested Findings For Denial : 1. Strict compliance with Section 9610 . 5 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code will not result in a substantial hardship to the applicant. Although the existing center is located 500 feet north of the nearest arterial highway, Warner Avenue, not permitting additional signage off-site will not result in the commercial center not having the exposure to vehicular traffic required to attract customers . Adequate signage for the site is provided by the existing sign. 2. The proposed sign is unsightly and will be detrimental to properties in the vicinity. The height, area and location of the sign are not compatible with adjacent properties . 3 . The proposed sign is oversized and will obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and poses a hazard. 4 . The proposed sign contains an excessive number of tenant panels and may be distracting and hazardous to passing motorists . A4��k VV)a n4 ALTERNATIVE 1• SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Strict compliance with Section 9610 . 5 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code will result in a substantial hardship to the applicant . The existing center is located 500 feet north of the nearest arterial highway, Warner Avenue. Not permitting additional signage off-site would result in the commercial center not having the exposure to vehicular traffic required to attract customers. 2 . The sign as approved does not adversely affect other signs in the area. The proposed sign is a modification to an existing sign which is located by itself within a landscaped planter. 3 . The sign as approved will not be detrimental to properties in the vicinity. The height, area and location of the sign are compatible with adjacent properties. 4 . The sign as approved does not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and does not pose a hazardous distraction. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and elevations as recommended by the Design Review Board (Alternative A) shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2 . The Parkway License Agreement between the City and the applicant shall remain in effect. 3 . The sign shall only be illuminated during the hours in which the center is open for business . In no case shall the sign be illuminated after 10 :00 PM. 4 . The maximum number of tenants on either side of the sign shall be limited to two (2) . 5 . The existing -nonconforming pole sign on the Huntington Harbour Mall site shall be removed prior to issuance of building permits . 6 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Special Sign Permit No. 89-5 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . . 7. Special Sign Permit No. 89-5 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1). year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. (6004d) ALTERNATIVE 2 : SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Strict compliance with Section 9610 . 5 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code will result in a substantial hardship to the applicant . The existing center is located 500 feet north of the nearest arterial highway, Warner Avenue. Not permitting additional signage off-site would result in the commercial center not having the exposure to vehicular traffic required to attract customers. 2 . The sign as proposed does not adversely affect other signs in the area. The proposed sign is a modification to an existing sign which is located by itself within a landscaped planter. 3 . The sign as approved will not be detrimental to properties in the vicinity. The height, area and location of the sign are compatible with adjacent properties . The sign is conditioned to provide additional landscaping to screen the adjacent residential properties from the sign. 4 . The sign as approved does not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic visibility and does not pose a hazardous distraction. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and -elevations as submitted by the applicant shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2 . The Parkway License Agreement between the City and the applicant shall remain in effect. 3 . The sign shall only be illuminated during the hours in which the center is open for business. In no case shall the sign be illuminated after 10:00 PM. 4 . The maximum number of tenant panels on either side of the sign shall be limited to three (3) . One panel shall be permitted to have multiple items of information and may be changed to feature different groups of tenants throughout the year. 5 . The existing nonconforming pole sign on the Huntington Harbour Mall site shall be removed prior to issuance of building permits. 6 . Additional landscaping shall be provided to screen the sign from the residents of Malta Circle. Landscape plans shall be submitted to the Director of the Department of Community Development and Public Works for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. (600004d) SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (CON'T) : 7. The City Council reserves the right to revoke Special Sign Permit No. 89-5 if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. 8 . Special Sign Permit No. 89-5 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. _.vJ (6004d) Au?''tori:ed�to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public 60,ices by Decree of the Superior-Court of Orange County, �aGfornia, Number A-6214, September 29, 1961, and A-24831 June 11, 1963 i STATE OF CALIFORNIA i County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforespid; I am over the ,'�" � ; PUBLIC,NUTICE- �4 NOTICE-OF age of eighteen bars, and not a party to or g g y � PUBLIC�HEARING interested in the below entitled matter. I am a APPEAL*OF PLANNING COMMISSION S OENIALa principal clerk of the ORANGE COAST DAILY �osPLSI-G" �y�PyERINIT N089-5 PILOT, a newspaper of general circulation, .cA reques"t'to mo"n' f ri existing Tf site sign for Huntington-.Harbour,MaIIK printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, the northwestcorner»of Warner_Avenue and,`Algon- County of Orange, State of California, and that quin Sheet) NOTICE IS HEREBY: attached Notice is a true and complete copy as RivEN;that the Funtitmgtdri Beach City Council will holtl was printed and published In the Costa Mesa, a'spubIichearIng i`the�Coun cil Chambe"rat;the�Hunt- Newport Beach, Huntington Beach Fountain 4,01„ .gqutl � 1�20bb Main, Street��Hunt� Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and ing nBeach Califor•rna o'n the date ariil at3thertime m{. Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper to wit :Consider, dbelowtoNreace�rveyan�d consider the statements ot, all persoris;who wis'hrtot be the issue(s) of. hegi.pX6 la2iveEto�he appli 13 cation..described below ;iDATE� LME fvlon`tlayj June 18 1990 7 Ol?PM I"%.APPLICATION NUMBER'•. (Special_Igp)Perrmit No %5. A P P= L June 7, 1990 icANVAPPEALANT-D D I Dunlap Corhpanies inci,f< + 'LOCATICQ,N Northwest i Corner of+Warner.Avenue j and Algoriqum Streef i i ZONE R3 m i(Mediu ,Hy igh i Density ResiBentiap$� � :� REPUEST,-:Theapplrcan prop ose's Io`modify-arrexist, ing`oseistor'sign`fora- ui- itigton_Habour Mall! aT$he' proposed,:s1_gn wo.0'to, �e»a� maximum helq,�b*'16.IRA•,I antl Ph'.area of 13.4quarg' feet including 3 tenant pan=i els,ode-of whichrtsproposed! to be changeable copy ` ; EN VIR;ONMENtAk STATUS: .Categorically ex-t empt. pursuant>ro`e:Section, 15303 Class,3ioof the Cali fornla Environmental Quality Act ir ON FILE;•rA copy ofthe proposed requests on file m1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the the Community Develop. ment Department I foregoing is true and correct. fvlain- treetf H ntingto i Beach�Califorma'92648 for; inspection by thputilicA Qcopyrof the staff report will Executed on Jame 7. , t gg be available to mter�est ad. partiestat&ty'Hall or they at Costa Mesa, California. Main city„ubrary tw(7 -1- TalbertKAvenue) after June 14-1990 �" AL Lk INTERESTED 9PER- SONSrare in f :..to attend; said hearing: rid de9p is opinionsnor sutiite id�enc-6 Signature tor'or agains�tte application' as,.outlinetl5;above If_there are anyy;further� quest i pl ors ease call Thomas'Rpgers iAssista- `Planner `afj 536 5271. :' Connie Brockway; City; Clerk Clty,of 3Huntington 3 � PROOF OF PUBLICATION Boer 6/5,90 k Publlshed-Oranget'Coastl` Daily Pllot June 7_1990 Tti-4371 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 89-5 (A request to modify an existing off-site sign for Huntington Harbour Mall at the northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Algonquin Street) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, June 18, -1990, 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Special Sign Permit No . 89-5 APPLICANT/ APPEALANT: D. D. Dunlap Companies Inc . LOCATION: Northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Algonquin Street . ZONE: R3 (Medium High Density _Residential) REOUEST: The applicant proposes to modify an existing off-site sign for Huntington Harbour Mall . The proposed sign would have a maximum height of 16 feet and an area of 134 square feet including 3 tenant panels , one of which is proposed to be changeable copy. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 , of the California Environmental Quality Act . ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library, (7111 Talbert Avenue) after June 14 , 1990 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Thomas Rogers, .Assistant Planner, at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk (5975d) CITY OF HUNTINGTON 'BEACH City of Huntington Beach Office of the City ClerkSSP` �q- P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 k{�;li q ;, t I •I it �. - •S cr . Of� , I`'9.2677 I;L_Ir..,;-:i;��ll�,-( I_;p�_:.Y`'`FI t '�� F� O .O t-'r'y • Ji FIRST CLASS MAIL V II:NIFNCTIIN UACH e g a I lWo—fice-- ---- City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 _.�,�zR:.�_._ ..raR. __. /� ;�•. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ca;t fiT ; `t _ Ryyws�i� a i'r' ij `7 l7 Y IY"f"r� Lf-it-l.1. 11_ r::j-i'4%iir.lr-ii::ii"'j ' rh J: ' ti::PflFL3�`fCCJ fat.-x-,7I'1E_.EXPIRED KAVA JAGH 4019 -- VIRGINIA- RD :#412 FIRST CLASS MAIL LIING SEACH 0A.-SM17-..aG3 Ht,NItNCTON UACH RETURN TO SEMOER ' LegalNotice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 a. . �.•4p� Cr in Y•(tip�✓' ��-1. -.;�. '\ n —±�'�/ 4r�' Itµ �y9yUY Noo 4 ; r-• A l r.� , g rah Jill FIRST CLASS MAIL HUKIINCT(W BI.ACH 1. , i _ c e _L �.�e 0 � �'! y ��7� � L/ � I J� I I - -� _ _ i I • >•_�i='!L �:F,':':MER :. _— _ 'L ha1=.41MAN ... I.T_Ir.�r�Y x::;.:i i',— .= I 7 i. 1 7041 i-.1-111r;TN I r.1 I 17101 C 11 IE��'-I_NE � 1..1:,7 !i'_rt—:N i — �� � 1 i I�Ih� BEACH, i A '�,�r'649 -: : ,..,;,�_.,n,,.. , :,,., _.c�!:.::I-! ,.-:,� �=,::.,_,:�.;, I ._r`J�l-:f.hJ.''1"._1 I �.� . L�i:` ._ _ i WI!..LIAM _; ?1A1 !-1E ; h ALOE'---, . 1 I _,. EDWARDt�"�7. i::.-:_Il.tl`. l .al_`t L `I, l.:f.Uf1 .Er' 1_ IN •7 7 ` 1 7 (�< !-T-.�r4 ! .I.I�Ii_� i N B1_.H CAL �:'i,�;./_9 _ � I'll._ I T .LP•G i �-N BEACH, i.:A . ,_.:ail''_ i ,I -. ;.-,EARl...: ... _.. .. __E i 9 RECORDS _ ! r�l•:�I'.1`Ih•i ._ _ ._ .:�i'�`'i' W I f .. . . . ...... . Ul. .. R, 1 4-'-0 2 LYNN ink HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 RECORDS I i I AM - I 4 0S FRANKLIN BURBANK, CA 91505 178-284-22 1_'j_--E r_ W - - d- -MUM _ i 1 Ih'--T Ni::'T BCH, - - - f i . n _ BEACH, I A 92649 I _ . _ ,..._ n _ j FTINTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 _.7 —_.e 4— 1 C- MAT . $' T H ' COURTNEY Hi INT I Ns iT 7 N BEACH,:: CA 92 649 rz 178— 84-34 1 RICHARD R TH MA r—: _ ;a !._OS Aral - _ . _'N.r,rr i:Sri .... ....r,r.:a-:, i::r-i :.rrFit :F I i::::I IMF i-E I F.— I`•0 t,:!f_fAL_I F'Y 1 N, F C F-'I iWl=:i::it`1AF�:Lt:[ { t:::i iF'Y[::[i.;1 T Ti;GJ 1'' J. : ._t !_ At._L_i Y E:F.rr.. I In - _ - -N is R!'jr.lr:.a I [:_ r I �� FhdItR'F=r !_E=F::. t...h' ' r-aC. ,i ij i 1 i ! .rtl..�± F,� L,_ _ r•ii....ri: j• !_:i_if'`Yr:J.i:,;.�.I. rc-;;•J 1. . l ERF `r r IHF?I r . r !it r .,i 1 r r r . _': ._.. ri''���1. FIE::F- h1;`tr�►:=,!`:ii•'J !:::I:Ft � ,F.•I:.Fr=T�1[ Af•:.i:1—I _ ;I r _I. I �1._�r.. _: iF-'•;'F ._ _•�, i I-,.lv _ . ... ... , i. IitJl'J1 .[ryr, ( !_N 1- .!ti:_:il. _ ... ' . - ,l, W L I....i F i 11 I I i' I_ ' :•J F.I f I1`4..r ; ,h _.h i 1 :_:';/6.1. L{1_L.t�hr_I L_.N ! !rl t: a: : F F _+Ia r I N «' — r�t f 1± Kin •f�f.�l t!�•I I::: 1 a - i. i` J. _iri I f rJ i t:::1 j, C f a I-- =' 6 4:_; Y �; .rF x'm f tv 91t�K3.r,r Y.'^: _Fartit I r=ail`1F'�_E T[__ :!: r:;Eil i:_; F AUa RE _ �" i::i iF'YF;.T.�;! I_F. TRW U [I :!f_fiv1.._At r tivil-'AIVIi_.: I.N >x- h`1+:<.vx^cv.�r..�...n.s-•.� - ��••n.--:..—.. +vy .o.... - x-n _•r C'i:. f _•:A T i f-_ - 1 T-r _._. ... ..C- _. .. _..i J L �I� T h-+' �r't I'�L V L' 17 1 C)I C::1='lURTNE-Y L_N is HUNTING TON LEA_I'-I, CA '_" - ._ - •.,�'�1::'.r� t ! =l-,• 1}•1 i�i_I_�.!I'�I I._L"d!`ll'I I! -{ I� _ 64'=� i__•-x;�`J`,,~-r-"-'-=a-.'. - =;� �V-IA !+r�l _ I 'AT!, RETURNED: RNE:I!e ;1 ld �•j I i ( -7_. i._ y i - I_.. IIII....;.- Y ? ;)��I. f'!try(_., I r-i !..•J.F.\ � - ,__. A.INLi..I f ify :!i_:.1"71._:i..;, _:F•j - �:'fi'': _ i 1 _ •ir',''L; 4 T IN 1 - "' _ •:>' � , !!_1`J ! .L I`J1� 11_ti'•� �:�f:=1.1!..: ';� 1_�i-� .,:'_r,':.i•:: t , ..f - t':!_J 1 1�!_l..l..I_'!`i f_f L::.F�!_:I 1 !_.-H .._r._ NCLEMEN] .i7......... 4 5'"1 1 W A RV! F E'F^;Yi'tl`I 1_ is )! 'i It"7 ll.l i'ii_IN . .i.tyi;�Ij;ra liE()I'_:I'i i_F1 :'.":�,••t': �`��'•'•' J. r., I_.I N 1:-.'I_.I J.i'i _.T I I I_I 1•\1 T I N 13..1 I_ONI B 1 (f 11-:I-A, CA-1 E.N `r r,.1.IJ 1.�_ ..I..I.t:l. 111_i W f. -f.._.r t '•3F 1f:I' I AR.�:I[ N i'-II_IMI 1"1 r`1 1 iat`a :C;) JT ._, ....I !;1 yl 11I' r �iC,'I':t' [::::I["IPi C:_..C.C:- :.. f;FT:I'Df .I:1'=: F I I-1�:1;�'TI �.,).....i] . i I tyiF j LI I1.1.J�_I ':a:I I. f` — _:_; I l_..i_ii.ar•11_!I_I i LAI 1r'1 i h;i;-i'FI I BEr j.,, j... I r .-. -. I�-jl 1,'`I I L I'''�L? ! I_i;�''; E'L-(-11.:: 1-i Y L.f'3 '-'..•''(':,'�.'-/ (- - I _ I Cy'.'•' .__, 1':.. _�_' :-1!._I-JI._I1`-Il.li.�J.r`, i 1 ._ r:1 _ -•iy ;�:j T-r _. �.- _ - _. __.- _.: i i,N I�_I_I—l 1-:: h-)F j--I, 1 ` .. _II_IF=1,-.1:J1'_ L,I_NAt f (`I `'� ..,j h.l .. i ' -'A �. r. I E NY ' r__...j. kj ��( —•' O°i - _. _: !=: --[i 1.4l_1 I_! I.r\! I i�l� t j I tyj �: ;Yn !j �'. _ - f _i J. _ ... N-'T I.1'`-1 P E ri 1__;...j l I._F a _.1': a / : . I'I,_�!d� :[iy11_; � 1_I;v j_%C::.f-i•..:I--I, i� ._ _ .. .- l : i n f [[• ... I 1 L I.A l y ,. '::1.--11•i I......',. 1. 1. 1�_•':`'._�.? r=1L._. ._ I j'J tt 1-- ._ - .- E_- I .I-If;r�:._..1=:._ I =(-`EL_'BEF: 1 _ � �1I_ti, _:Ei ..i }: --- - ... -- ., AN I11 DC NQ 1' I i'1-�_ � fIh = Ih i E le lJ r .aa"_J ►�-Vyhl' �C. J �.r r't �.—-1. r_i— s — � - - - 'T ``I 16961 BOLERO LP..; -.�NTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264. WON •.7 ",... .t:..::.1. ;..il II`; it [, I 4 YoQ _- j ''��.:��ti., ;.+' :fit ' F6 L!DG :1, l T- j ,uv JT 31�r 4cv o-g r FS -252-25 178 NO HUNTINGTGN BEACH MIKE _._::i!._!!iI:_ HUNTINGTON F h. 1 "" —.- ..1 -• a''': I•jF'-I I"'``I- Imo. �l�C::.A..�L..!�! w -xv I n.; Ci,; -117 931-40 DALE A 1\: .L'_ . _`0tti!__l,il INQU.i N S .. "= L..fa GU 1��Fi' � ��✓L'[., i4 ,�G 7 / I•II_f,v 1 i Nl::T_IN BEACH, 14AD, RETURNED: J. r_t'Y}_ TT'-!,C-i iEJ. �NE�:R [=[_i__I I :r=ir•': 3922'�' J:Ei I:1_I':' TIF{ 5 =.1�):: Ei.t.rN�ivl�: AVE � H� F 1'iN•`I O '1 BEACH,H, _A : __.::0.1 ` I'a�,INl I li11.7 `1 t !1-Ift� I .[1' _ 1 .:N L-{ I (_ :r �rON Ijf=.raCH, I::A ' 1264 17AD, RETURNED: 31 u LIF�i�1:E El__ A I_r=',r'1F`t l:_:L_I__ L..r-;h:RY i''i 220 COASTLINE DR HUNTINGTON BOACH, CA 92649 SEAL BEACH, CA 90740 t i)Y DENNIS :i=AL...E_: l IRE::W:1:L.EFi � -., � - NQUIN - i';1_�N 1":[r`a I:;l-I�i rd BEACH, CA . .._._%';�>16960 I"I1_ll�i.•! I111.iI.ON BEACH 93 1 -�-�I.0--0% - - BILLI MORRI ON Ljr�;hllEl__ ��1 E�::r�'�}F:rNr,C1-i _ 1. �''60 AL_C:ONi:UIN `iT. #1 -. ii-,i y r; , ,• 'J. ..'1 F-Ir_;r';T:[N0Thi BI..H, (::AL.. ;;, ;x;.'-' I•-I•_+r�al`IM�!: 1-r:al'�J BEACHCA '-':;=','''=�'::; .�_.. . , WEIDE K I 8260 DAVISTA .._thy :rk.i" 931-40-086 178-284-21 931-40-089 _ a ;,..:... •_' I r-•{r`i MARTIN i�r 17021 -7;) i sir_ , - _ . ;_1, -• 0 rll....i_,I_N !UI11 =: f lr:-;tJ; ! 1':' j!" TlN N 1';C I •II _4 - WOW 931-40-09-5 ALGONQUIN KEN [WAN PKIND l.;i+I, :1. , _. IN_: _. .BEACH CA, ' - _ 16960 At...+-,:,,ra+.'UIN ..T B1,._1_G � 93i-40-097 931-40-100 —206 UA1_E I E_ R AMES J.6960 BEACH 1-11_NT I r` GTON BEACH CA 9260 F::A.1_I_H a r,._.. R I , , F I fi 1 I r::.,l 1<•.(-�y::}!-•I Y•, hIP4 :AIRY E I`_"I_i PF' 18042 _Ar::h.PO I N•I•• DI i A 92647 1.f_ {_0 A�...I_il_IIVI_.�_ I i i Vi { : - - 1 1 _6 HUNTINGTON BEACH, A 92649 I;l_i h4-�I-I N'3 I i r`1 [r f,`;I_:1..1.fLi 921-40-110 L+r-a•r I D M SINGER 16960 F'tl Gi 1h.LaI i 1-hi ST HUNITINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTIOTON BEACH, 931-40-112 — -. � -I,I_.r,,"] N) TOr'a BEACH, i::ha . 2 64'::, Jc)� y ►ao� �,�� 11 Q CA �7.' `1 - 40-115 - ..:I % _t ll`IF`'1�.'+_I_� �: Yl'i_IT'1�1'l'1 _: i joy 16615 LARK AVE #101 H Ira f I N—G inniN EYr_.Fi+_ H CA I_O'_; GATOS, CA i ?psi i --'-SEARCH f- RCCOMPLETE: f Ir(I i COPYRIGHT 1986 i i 78— ,7 1 -•-0 n -' - - - 0 _. _ ! 4`Jf�l'';f._i F::'F-tf� F-C`I�:•I•;.-'�i-Il 1:::' ROBERT E Mc GEE f 16921 1 ALGONQUIN - HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 -. L-I I .`f T r�!{�;-!..{_{ra E,E:.a:"1+:::1-1 I r tr i - n;4xi - Legal Notice city of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ^s'' 931-400-83 Baker, Gina 16960 Algonquin St. Huntington Beach, CA 92649, •o ` FIRST CLASS MAIL I II IN 1114 r(1N BF AC Legal Not:ci City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 931-400-81 Kim, Power 16960 Algo 1 Hunzi ngton Beth; \�A2 ` FIRST CLASS MAIL H:IN;;N(.r(,N BEACH { --� _ Legal notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 -C, UJ 6 _ lU` . HI:N IN � (.rf)N SI ASH I IN FIRST CLASS MAIL � 7 Legal Nofice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Tile . II'' �`III'•:>�`-; FIRST CLASS MAIL ° v HIINIINCTON StAfH ll1ll1l111liilildfilifilil11ifif11 4 t_egal-N�oClce City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 931- 14 401- 1Howard, 6960 Al gongui rBldg 4 >�G�, 4 Huntington Beach, -� FIRST CLASS MA "I P,1114 JON S[A(-H Legal City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach. CA 92648 -0 31 -y 0- 0.9 � / (dC A. v o» FIRST CLASS MAIL III IN IN ON 81 A!•H Jill„111(,Illll111111111111111 Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 .�z. s �< ��,r._.� ! Huntington Beach, CA 92648 prt E 50 - ? •'• 'Gib ._ __. �� x` _•�`'�r:�—_,'�• i.c ._IC_f=1="�i�`r` r~1 ���i iL+ha I C:Fr: _ .__. _._. �, `.,. ;�� , J FIRST CLASS MAIL 111!ti111N.",(.N N MACH Y t• I z; i� � � s 01. st ..fir -..� Legal Notice .._ _ __:_. -------- City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 ...... ...... : ti Huntington Beach, CA 92648 s -s7, ! _ r _ �t '_ .�•�.'J,d -ram'; FIRST CLASS MAIL )4 O.11-M.TON REACH - t K