Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTentative Tract 10853 - CUP 79-23 - EIR 80-5 - Mola Developm r1 /•. ACTION ENGINEERING -- HOIA PROPERTY Hazarets Report 1.0 Introduction and Summary 1.1 Introduction Thi.a report *.ass prepared :it the request of the City of 11unt- ington Beach to determine if potential health hazards exist on-site as a result of subsurface materials. Within the project boundaries is a former Class III landfill sits, located in the 17,000 block of Bolsa Chica Bouelvard (Figure 1). the applicant, Hola Developaent, proposes the development of 224 condominium units on 12.5 acres. Roughly 5.0 acres in the northern portion of the site was utilized for landfill purposes. Approxinately 30 units would be located over the old landfill .area. Several multiples family residential development: already exist directly adjacent to the project boundaries and/or old landfill site. A previously prepared methane gas study identificd low con- centrations of methane gas and acid sludge residues from petroleum refining existing on-site. A subsequent analysis of the acid sludge material identified the odor-causing agent as sulfur dioxide. The application of a neutral base substance (i.e. , lime) was recommended as a general mitigation measure. Additional information on how this measure is to he implexented and its resulmnt enuironmental impact win requested by City staff. Therefore, measures to mitigate the cexis:i.i,; odor impact will be discussed in conjunction with measures recoimactidiM to mitigate potential health hazards should toxic chemicals be ident. - fied on-site. 1.2 Summary (to be completed) 2.0 Test Methodology Phase I of the sampling program involved a review of .available reports asstcssing subsurface conditions (i.e. , Hethanr Gas Report, Soils Report, etc.). The preliminary soils investigation dated October 3, 1978, contained a map showing the location of 17 on-site borings, as well as a complete boring loi; with information on the type of materials found and at which depth they were observed. The Methane Gas Study included pressure and combustibility information on subsurface gases from ten i;anple well locations. The methane gas data provided informa- tion as to the primary locations of subsurface decomposition. To define the general boundaries of the landfill, the salient data frc:i the :dare mentioned reports was plotted on a field .. : vey rap. lbereafter, a final field investi,,atiuu vns completed to determine tbt, location of six additional borinrir (see Figure 2 - Samly:e Lucaticns) . On the :^)rning of (Ictober 9, 1979, a drillinj, rie, (a-jger/bucket type) wns uti l i zed for t:ie purpose of providing subsurface loll and water nnnpleu for analyf;is. i i c„ � �Y1 � .W,ln'�"1, T- ?,;�,", —'"..,ti,.+""'F' '� .��w«..,.«w.,r- :iTM'�'x.^" S!�S^'!7 1..ms u.woe.srr,ewsY+re...•r.ww:*-�+.^'^1. t•••^—.�a+ re r.n-* .r M�y '� F.p•a-C�N,�",-�Fi.:'oi'..fa 7 C- 1 PA S +wrlwvr.6..arw.ev.t+r.ar.o.�+.wa7Y�r P�wr r+.w•.+`.r�l rMwa.e.u...�.+G�....w+•'rrr....Krw�+wrw.,ru.i i - i i ll i 16 . ' • 1 - • I t I i t 'c2 'f 3 ® *q 1 �► I U I ¢ � f n - I � In 19 SAMPLE LOCATIONS CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGIMEERING SACK K. BRYANT & ASSOCIATES, INC. FIGURE 2 6"t•.er.M w.s_UM s.w.Woos r"M C+."M lasso cn.u.s w i Boring data is as follows: 1) 0 to 14 feet (0 to 10 feet -- much concrete, some lumber; 10 to 14 feet oil saturated soil, noticeable odor) 2) 0 to 30 feet (0 to 30 feet -- easy drilling, little nonorganic matter, mild odor) 3) 0 to 30 feet (0 to 30 feet -- easy drilling, mostly oily sand, strong odor at lower depths) 4) 0 to 13 feet (0 to 10 feet -- difficult drilling, con- crete slabs; 7 to 9 feet -- sludge materials;' 10 feet --- oily materials, nearly liquid around concrete rubble; first water sample taken at 13 feet) , 5) 0 to 10 feet (0 to 6 feet -- very difficult drilling; 6 to 10 feet -- highly odorous materials). 6) 0 to 15 feet (0 to 10 feet -- organic debris, water seepage; at 15 feet second water sample taken) Soil specimens were taken from various depths to form a composite sample for each boring. The samples were placed in individual containers and sealed for delivery to Associated Laboratories, Inc. for an assessment of their chemical composition. From October 10 to tloverber 2, 1979, Associated Laboratories analyzed the canter.:Y of the samples taken from the site. Composite samples were made from those taken from the site. On this basis, Asso- ciated Laboratories tested three composite simples for organic (i.e., chlorinated hydrocarbans, phenols) and inorganic (i.e. , arsenic, sel- Lnium, ash, as well as general spectrographic identification) materials. The water sampJc was specifically tested for arsenic, selenium, and phenols. In addition, a general spectrographic at;laysiu was conducted on the water sample after an unfiltered sample was dried and ashed. The results of this analysis are attached. I I i i i I I f . 1 4 1 r, l I I , f ASSOCLUED LABORATORIES ~ 1815wChopmanAvenue • orange,CalilomJa92668 • 7141639.1650 CLIENT .LACK K. BRYANT L ASSDGIATESr INC. LAB NO. A06134 444 W, OCEAN BLVO. , SUITE 1400 LONG BEACH, CA 90802 REPORTED 11/2�79 SAMPLE SOILS it WATER RECEIVED 10/10/79 I • IDENTIFICATION -- BASED ON SAMPLE AS SUBMITTED THE THREE SOIL SAMPLES WERE ANALYZED FOR THE FOLLOWING CONSTITUENTS. 'I ;At4PLF s1 S11f.1't,E x2 5AMPLF. N3"1 ,jt, 2afAN_IC ; ARSENIC 0.025 PFM 0.OI PP14 0. 01 PPM i SELENIUM ND<O. 005 PPM 1 . 4 PP14 ND<0.005 PP14 ASH 5. 1 X 56.0 X 6S. 1 X SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS (AS-IS SA515 ) SILICON 1 . 3 % 15. 0 % 16. 0 ALUMINUM 0.30 % 4 . 2 % 4 .7 X IRDN 0. 06 X 1 . 2 % 1 . 4 X SODIUM 0. 3D a.. 0 3.3 % CUNT ON PAGE 2 t�St;Ph;,4COtl.rrltl�lG � Trier fryartt o'the Alfacl,trd l It DU(arr+r,re conlidenllel rmprftY of our cfle.11{ ehu f"ev ndf be re Droduced Or wee for DVbIICelmn In Fort of In full aItnrvt our written Dt+mltllon. ��-'�•�':'�^""�Y7! i Tfrts It tar ire viuval otowimm at the Dutllc.car clients.end ouml.ef. Erl:^r�nn:rn!c 1 Al JACK K. BRYANT 6 AS50CIATES, INC. LAB No. A06134 PAGE 2 (SPECTORGRAPHIC, CON'T) 5AdPLE a1 SAMPLE a2 $AMPLE 03 CALCIUM 0. 14 % 1 . 5 % 2. 3 X I .. MAGNESILH 0. 020 % 0. 40 % 0. 46 % TITANIUM 0. 023 X 0. 28 % 0.24 X BARIUM 0.0037 % 0. 030 X TRACE BORON 0. 00ul % 0. 0019 0.0018 x MANGANESE 0.0014 X 0.027 X 0.024 % LEAD 0. 00008 % 0. 0009 x 0. 0014 % GALLIUM 0. 00016 % 0. 0023 % 0. 0029 % NICKEL 0.00016 % 0. 0034 X 0. 0033 X VANADIUM 0. 00023 X 0.0024 X 0. 0029 X COPPER 0. 0002 X -0. 0037 X 0. 0050 X, SILVER ND ND ND 7.I NC ND ND 14D Z,XONIUM 0. 0021 % 0. 014 w 0. 00511 % COBALT TRACE TRACE 0. 00" % STnONTIUM 0. 0021 % 0. 02 X 0. 022 S POTASSIU14 0. 043 % 0. 57 X 0. 04 % CHROMIUM 0. 00056 : 0. 009 % 0. 013 % i OTHER ELEMENTS IJIL NIL NIL CON' T ON PAGE 3 17 fA 4+ I t4� ` • I . 1 i JACK K. BRYANT 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. LAB NO. A06134 PAGE 3 SAMPl 9 M1 SAMPLE +r2 SAMPLE- a.:L ORGANICS I i CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS 5-20 PPM* 5-20 PPM* 5-20 PF14* i PCB PCB PCB y NO OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS WERE FOUND. *THE PCB FRACTION L.:NNrT BE ACCURATELY ESTIMATED SIIJCE IT APPEARS 4 TO BE A COMPLEX MIXTURE OF ARACLOR 1221 , 1232 , 1242 6 1248. t PHENOLS 14D<0. 003 PPM t1D<0.003 PPM ND<0. 003 PPM THE WATER SAMPLE WAS TESTED FOR THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS. ARSENIC ND <0. 01 FIG/L SELENIUId 1 .3 MG/L PHENOLS ND .<0. 003 MG/L A PORTION OF THE UNFILTERED SAMPLE WAS DRIED . ASHED A14D A SPECTRO— GRAPHIC ANALYSIS WAS PERFORMED ON THE ASH. THE RESULTS ARE GIVEN it BELOW t SPECTPQGPAPHT C c i SILICON 16. 0 % .ALUMINUM :.. 9 % IRON 4 . 9 % i j SOD IUN 6. 6 % 1 CALCIUM 5. 4 i CON' T 014 PACE 4 • JACK K, BRYANT 6 ASsOCIATES, INC. LAB No, A06134 PAGE 4 SPECTROGRAPHIC (COWT) 14AGNES I U14 2. 6 X TITANIUM 0.73 x BAR 1 U14 TR<0.05 X BORON 0. 016 X MANGANESE 0.085 % LEAD NDt0.0005 X GALLIUM 0. 0041 x NICKEL 0.0066 % VANADIUM 0. 0044 X COPPER 0.016 % SILVER 0.00041 % f ZINC 0. 12 X i kZIRCONIUM 0. 0044 X c COBALT 0. 0034 % { STROUT I U14 0. 03 9 % POTASSIUM 2. 4 % CHRom I U14 0. 021 % OTH;R ELE14ENTS NIL A55QC l A G LAE30Fi�.T fi t ES �4ri �Epoy 1{IdErpSv � Alternative. liitiy;ation Measures . 1. No Prefect This alternative would allow the land to remain in its current state, and the present interim undeveloped In.-J use would continue. The - no project 'alternative would :also preserve the site for future proposals ` (i.e., park). however, the City of Huntington Beach General Plan land use designation and on-site zoning would accomodate the applicant's j proposed condominium development. Therefore, a General Plan amendment and zone chsnge may be required to implement any use other than resi- dential on-site. This alternative would avoid adverse shurt•-term odor impacts on adjacent existing residential areas. However, long-term adverse ' impacts to groundwater supplies would continue. Whether or not mitiga- tion measures would be required if the property remains undeveloped would require additional analysis, particularly in the area of ground-" water movement. For 'example, the exlstnnce of a clay layer between the depths of 34 to 40 feet may be inhibiting downward migration. Although, the State Department of Water Resources generally idefititied this site as contributing to the closure of a nearby water well. On this basis all further analysis concerning groundwater will assume on-site ma- terials contribute to the degradation of this resource. In regard to future proposals, as a result of implementing the no project alternative at this time, mitigation measurer, similar to those being discussed In this report would be required. For example, should a park use be implemented on the project site, both grading and ' landscaping would be required. Any large scale grading on-site could result in short--term cdor Impacts necessitating mitigation. Measures would be required t►+ limit the amount of irrigation and/or percolation ` . . occurring on-site, since these waters will normally seep through fill materials to contaminate groundwater supplies. Likewise, similar measures would be required to minimize any contact of toxic and/or hazardous materials contact with landscape root sysletns, due to their , ability to draw materials up through their circulatory system to the j surface, where children might be exposed. I Generally, recreational uses on-site should result in greater municipal expenditures than would be anticipated if the site were de- veloped as a residential use. 2. rxclvstion and Removal of Unsatisfactory Soils Materials and Inportation of Acceptable Fill Materlals Total exca-ation of unsatisfactory n:iterialp would necessitate the removal of anproximaLely 105,000 cubic yards of fill, assuming the old landfill enconpr,saeu ;i►proximately live acres and tua. an av,crar,(. depth of 13 feet. A similar amount of acceptable f111 material would be required. Houghly 2,000 truck trips would t►c required to remove the cxcavrated material to an acceptable Class, 1 landfill. A elmilar amount of truch trips would be required Lo irr•116rt fill naterialr. to the rite. Additional tank truckr► would be required in order to disprr.r;e neutral- 1-:ing for odor control p'rrpc►.es (refer to Alternative No. j - 03or 111t1F;aL1on ;or additional informition) . y f 1 t Truck traffic, over and above that normally expected at a ' construction site of this ,size, would increase air pollutants as a result of the increased vehicle miles traveled, increase the noise impact along adjacent arterials, and result in greater dust and street maintenance impacts. In order to minimize the impacts a9sociated with the construction dust,. daily street sweeping shculd be required. The liquid neutralizing agent will serve to reduce the generation or par- ticulate matter on-site during grading operations. In addition, all trucks leaving the site should be covered to minimize air-blown duct particles along routes taken to the landfill. The State Department of stealth Services indicated the ma- terials identified on-site would be acceptable at Class I landfill facilities located in Southern Califnrnia (i.e. , Palos Verdes, Cala- basas, and/or Vest Covina). Implementation of thin alternative mitigation measure would be extremely expensive and time consuming. A direct benefit of thin+ treasure would be to remove those spoils from the site to a more accept able landfill location, thus eliminating a potential long-term health '.i. hazard. However, with the implementation of t[i:3 measure the City should anticipate a short-term odor impact to .:-ur even with imple- mentation of the odor mitigation measures discussed Inter in this section. The State Department of Health Services indicated that a Hazardous Waste Permit would be required if materials are to be removed from the site. In addition, in order to insure proper handling of fill materials a qualified licensed contractor would be required to transpirt materials to an acceptable landfill. The field engineer should br required to maintain a daily log on the number of trucks exiring the site. Furthermore, the landfill operator should be aware of the open, - ' tion and staff and/or representative approved by the City be allowed to maintain a log of those trucks entering the landfill facility. []pan completion of the initial excavation phase, the field engineer's log book and landfill records should be turned over to the State Department { of health Services for review. In addition, the on-site excavation s should be reviewed by State officials prior to the placement of fill in order to determine whether or not all unsatisfactory materials have been removed from the site. }� On-site excavation and/or digging shall be conducted only in i the presence of the field encineer and/or his designated representative. The field engineer shall be equipped to detect methane and hydrogen sulfide gas concentrations and will have the authority to req-lire workers in the vicinity of such gases to wear protective masks. Further- more, the field engineer will be rer;ponsible for operating portable fans In the vicinity of stork where such [vases are suspected to be present in order to disperse such gases. Based an the data obtained in the origi- nal methane gas study, it appears that the concentrations will not reach dangerous levels either on or off-trite. 3. Uml>crmeable narrler With Chits alternative a ssnn-perrivable membrane could he Jiro- vidcd several feat below the surface elevation in order to prevent the s migraticn of toxic and hazadous mraeeri.-als and/or gas migration. A sufficient number of driven piles would be required in order to provide adequate foundation support. The previously prepared methane gas report indicated that no gas control system is warranted due to the low pressures and combustibility of methane concentrations found on-site. t if a barrier is implemented to prevent; the migration of hazardous chemi- - cals and/or- gases, a collection and ventilation system may be required in order to prevent the: buildup of flammable and/or hazardous gas -con- centrations beneath the barrier. This alternative may also necessitate an odor control scrubber (i.e., Virutrol) if a centralized collection system is implementers. In addition, several permanent gas probes may be required in order to provide continuous subsurface gas pressure and mitigation data. A 30 mil chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) polymeric liner has } been shown to be impervious to methane and other common natural gases and meets with the standard gas transmission test of ASTH A-1434. Additional information is required nt this time in order to determine whether the acid sludge materials deposited on-site would affect the Integrity of this type of barrier. It may also be possible to utilize the on-site tnr-like ma- terials, mixed with soil, to form an impervious harrier. With a backhoe and bulldozer, it would be possible to pull these materials up from the central portion of the site (along the southern edge of t►,e landfill) and lay it out in windrows for the bulldozer to mix. The process would be similar to the making. of asphalt roadways. Roughly eight feet of topsoil would then be spread over this barrier prior to construction. Odor impacts: should be anticipated whenever surface soils are removed. Therefore, an odor mitigation program similar to that dis- cusscd in Alternatives No. 2 and lla. 5 would be: required. Although this type of mitigation measure may be feasible in protecting adjacent and future residents, it would not eliminate all of ' the impacts associated with existing; fill materials. The implementation of an impermeable barrier would limit the quantity and location of water percolating through the fill material. Irrigation restrictions and positive drainage to the street would lie needed to reduce percolation on the project site. I i The soils retort, aneLhane gas report, and sample borings taken In association with this report, all indicate that the groundwater reaches W thin 10 to 14 feet of the surface on portions of the project site. These same reports indicate that t`:e fill material extends tc n depth greater than 14 feet. On this basis, it appears that the ground- water is currently intruding into the fill material during; certain times of the year. Any grou•adwater intrusion into this material will serve to dissolve soluble chemicals (including; Lite carbon dioride noted in the methane gas study) and subsequently contribute to the contamination of groundwater resources. A certain amount of groundwater contaimiation has already occurred in the area. A well (State well # South/11 West-21 North 02) located approximately a quarter of a mile to the northeast of g the site, was closed prior to 1970 due to its poor quality (i.e,, taste). 3� • 0 i`.LtiLI".rig..'f�J��Iti..�...•�Y._•.'a �R'!'a�+vnnwsw..u....,.:x, �_.._ • This mitigation measure will necessitate additional engineer ' ing if a control systcm is required prior to the issuance of building permits. Generally, it would reduce the long-term impacts associated with the odoriferous materials while allowing for continur.tiou of exist- ing subsurface groundwater impacts. In addition, by allowing subsurface materials to remain on-site, the possibility of future exposure exists should the integrity of the barrier be, violated. For example, the Seal - Beach Fault, is locrted toss than !00 feet south of the property. Further- more, the CC 6 R's should include provisions to prohibit any e::cnvations by future residents on the site without the prior approval of the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department. If a barrier is incorporated Into the project.• design, a detailed maintenance progrcm should be re- quired to provide the proper operation of the equipment (i.e. , gas collection, gau probes). 4. Pile Foundation and Subsequent Application of Neutralizing Agent This alternative was originally proposed to mitigate surface odors as a result of gas migration. However, this alternative would nawt be effective in reducing the potential exposure of future residents to low level toxic and/or hazardous wastes stared on-site. Therefore, this altera•.ative is not considered viable. 5. Odor Hitigation • This mitieat.ion Measure would be required in conjunction with either Alternative Ilo. 1, 2 or 3. Since excavation will expose cdortf- Brous materials, an odor mitigation measure is required. Since the odoriferous materials have been identified as basically acid compounds, { a neutralizing base agent would be required. Several base --hemical solutions have been recommended (I.e. , sodium hypochlorite, lame or I limestone, or chlorine). During excavations adjacent to the project site, the County of Orange indicated that sodium hypochlorite bolut•ion was only mari;inally adequate. However, only_ two small Land-operated sprayers were utilized for the purpose of applyiaag the odor control agent. ! For a project of this scale the utilization of large tanker i trucks equipped with high pressure nozzles would be required in order to apply the neutralizing agent. To be effective the oxidiz!.ng base agent must be applied Immediately after grading equipne•ai- has pasted. Should the on-site supply of neutralizing agent be axhau::ttd, the field engi- neer will be resp.ansible for stopping work until .:n adequate supply is available for application. Prior to any en-site gradings the applicant should be required to implement an advance notification program. This program must incur- J pgr3te written notification to those residents living within n radius of 1,000 feet of the project site. Tha notification should be delivered several days; prior to any excavation work. The Orange County floral th Department indicated In their letter dated tlo%,ember 3, 1976, that a program such art this could have eliminated most of the anticipated complaints experienced in 1976. leased on available analytical information, it appears that the i primary odoriferous gas is sulfer dioxide. However, the Orange County i .. i • Health Department indicated in their November 3, 1976, letter that the City had provided test data showing traces of methyl mercaptan, hydrogen sulfide, and other odoriferous organosulfer compounds existed on--site. The existence of this report and data has not been verified as of this date. Assuming the major component of the odor is sulfur dioxide, treatment by neutralizing the acid with a cheap base material would � probably be the most effective. The underlying technology, based on S02 removal either by application of a dry alkaline absorbent graded .into the subsoils or by an alkaline solution applied by sprayer �!quipmcnt, has been available for a number of years. Although directed at Indus- try, the U. S. Environwcrtal Protection Agency had a similar application technology very mach in mind when it issued standards in June covering emissions of S02 particulates and nitrogen oxide. Application of a neutralizing base subst.•tce on known acid ! sludge materials should not result in an adverse reaction (i.e. , tonic fumes, violent reaction). It could affect subsurface soil characteris- tics such as hardness, pll, and available carbon dioxide. Studies of diffusion of gases from fills into the surrounding soils show the possi- bility of increased carbon dioxide in decomposing fill material becoming dissolved in percolated water nd so increasing its aggressiveness and a • hardness. 11ormal landfills ha%e a gar ratio of approximately 50-50 methane and carbon dioxide. However, the methane gas study prepared on the project site noted a high carbon dioxide to methane ratio. There- {+: fore, the application of a base neutralizing agent (i.e. , lime) to the acid sludge materials and free carbon dioxide noted in subsurface soils, should result in a neutral condition which significantly reduces the "l emission of S02 whiln reducing the CO2 concentration of subsurface soils. In other words, the measure will serve to reduce water hardness : which in turn should lower the pil value. Tile State Water Resources Hoard last taeasured the pH in 1970 and found it to I approximately 8.1 which is high but within accepted limits. i . t 1 It appears that the implericentation of this mitigation measure would have some positive results, although it cannot be 100Z effective In reducing the odor impact. Therefore, an odor impact should be anti- cipated in the vicinity of V_,! project. site. The- significan;!e of this Impact will probably depend on the duration of on-site grading operations. 6. Density Bonu:. (. Should this project becone nonviable as a result of implement- ing one or more of the aforementioned mitigation measures, the City may consider the granting of a density bonus to arsure financial rrsriurcer necessary to develop the site in the most environmentally acceptable manner. This alternative mitiEat;on ru•ataire, it approved, would allow the Jevelaper additlonal units that could providr Monies when sold to offset the cunt associated with mitit;ativu. f:vett UK.1UE1,11 additional units would b,_ constructed vn the site. the City would be assured that existing adjuce::t residents. as: well as any future residents occupying the project site, would be provided :t cafe a,nd healthful environment. 1 , . If the proposed prcject Jr, not developed it appears that the project site will remain in its existing condition for some time to come. Therefore, those existing Impacts identified in this report would continue until that time when additional mitigation is applied. This report has identified a major tradeoff between an adverse: short-teen odor impact and the long-term adverse degradation of ground- water rsources. Three major courses of action are available: 1) the no project alternative, with continuation of existing subsurface ground- water impacts, 2) develop the site in a manner which would minimize the odor impact with •some resultant groundwater impacts remaining, or 3) develop the site in a manner which assures proper disposal of waste materials, although result in a short-term adverse odor impact. Generally it appears that the City could benefit from this f measure so long as its purpose is assured siginifcant, long-term com- munity-wide benefits (i.e., excavation of hazardous wastes and proper disposal). . a 1 f. ' �5 • f r f _..•.+rr+il4sL'JA'E:b.SYS,.a'.t'LYY Ll'..r..: r .2:;, .. *::n .. ... .-� n.. ..... .... ... .,.....�•.... ...-.....«san-n .:yr ic.......« .:r *,'. 'M^iLTy.•Li.'K r.�ti f w..C�.a,"�(•i I ti i i ' - I /A REQUES f FOR CITY kaG7UNCIL ACTION o Date July 9, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles 19. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: James '.7. Palin, Director of Development Services W .11 r� L DY 4t1?!ADIUMC '! Subjea: REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT - PARK AND ECREATION FEES MINI I Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analy' sis, Funding Source,Aft is.Atti I STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Request contained in the Mola Development Corporation letter dated July 7, 1982, attached herewith requesting postponement in the payment of the County Sanitation District fees and the recreation and park fees for Final Tract Map No. 10853. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Council approve the postponement of the County Sanitation Dlatrict fees and part: and recreation fees as requested subject to sufficient guarantee for the park and recreation fees as may be required by the City Administrator. ANALYSIS: 4tc�r:. On 4 rry 28, 1982, tha City Council concurred with a request sub- mitted on the postponement of the County Sanitation fees and park and recreation fees and instructed staff to prepare the appropriate ordinances to implement same. Ordinance No. 2564 was approved by the Council at its July 6 meeting which would afford postponement of the sewer fee until the issuance of building permits. Ordinance No. 2545 relating to an amendment postponing park and recreation fees has not been submitted back for Council approval an of this date ttt additional information needn to be provided on the overall bulling coat of the total park system within tho-, City. staff is anticipating that this ordinance will be buck for approval at the August 2 meeting. i Mr. Mola had stated previously in :tip- January 14 letter, which was submitted as supplemental informat.iv,i on --rune 28 (at which time the Council tnstruc�•ed staff to m!':e the aforementioned amendments) , �3 FIO 4/31 ,.,w.•.-^�r•,.t, -.r..n .�.....T.... - • y � ...ram:.'. - •, :r......«..... n..r.:: x I�fi'...•z. :'.1 .'..1•-•�,i:1Fi+.i...,:i. . y .•_.. + ..'•aid ..._. •'j. ;.." ._': .'i; .. -..:c1,'.::: -:tt�t.v.+�.M...»...+n..rltj`;1 J..%,, ...y�..r 7(� ' 1 I j . i► or ANALYSIS (Con't. ) that approximately $319,000 would be carrying costs for his project -- Final Tract Map No. 10853. The County Sanitation fee and the City's park and recreation fee were in the total costs involved. They amounted to over $500,000 in fees required for this project and certainly were the lions share of the interest money required to carry a project for the two (2) years as outlined in Mr. Mola's letter of January 14, 1ya2. Based upon this increase per unit, ranging from $500 to $1, 000 per unit, staff unanimously recommended to the Council ;:hat provisions be structured into the Code to allow this postponement. .*cola Development Corporation was originally hoping to have Final Tract Map No. 10853 on your 19th Agenda for acceptance, however, additional information is required in order to process the final + tract map itself. The final tract map will not be submitted for Council review and acceptance until the August 2 meeting. Mr. Mola has 'asked thirt the request for postponement appear on your July . 19 Agenda for review and action. FUNDING SOURCE: None, other than the loss of interest that may occur to the park and recreation funds by postponement. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: No action on the request for postponement until such time as the ordinances become effective which could create one of the follow- ing: a. Increase the cost per unit to a future: buyer. " i b. Delayed construction of the project could possibly f increase construction costs. ' f� CiVT:JWP:j s Attachment: 1. Mola Development Corporation letter dated July 71 1982. f' it '�«iw h:.i1::y'vt°�aF'�=�.•..J'S'i.. .- ...n .....�f.�YfY['.M:a.+n�iTLr;,.., i�_.. .. `. .:c.w....+.--....-�..-.+.wq:�ni•.:.^.. �M a.h;'rll:�.r3w• Mola Development Corporation //r.r. -r w+ .t r.. +r.r .��.w.�+.•� ri. rr.rr t�..rr.�� irrr rr�rr•r�n .wwrr r.r F/J yi Firi:'1�I;(�ii::.i� July 71 1982 r Huntington Beach City Council CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Charles Thompson, City Administrator Dear City Council: At your June 28, 1982 meeting, staff was directed to prepare an ordinance to postpone collection of County Sanitation Dis- trict fees until issuances of building permits and to collect park and recreational fees at the time of final inspection or occupancy of the units. As you know, this action was prompted in part by our letter of January 14, 1982, which requasted that fees be paid when the services are rendered. r We are now about ready to submit our Bolsa Chi,ca Project Final Tract Map No. 10853 to the City Council for acceptance and recordation and would like to L-ake advantage of this new policy. We therefore request permission to record Final Tract Map No. 10853 subject to payment of County Sanitation District fees at the time of issuance of building permits and to pay park and recreational fees at the Lime of final inspection of our residential units. We agree to provida sufficient guarantees for payment of thdse fees, as required by the City Administrator. Thank you for considering this request. If you have any ques- tions please let me know. Very tru • yuurs, a 1110 DEV 1OPMENT CORPORATION JUL 0 71982 a k J. CITY OF HUIONGTGN BEACH President Iola, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE FJM/cd cc: James Palin, Director of Development Services .-.�r�.,r-tff+,-^f�^ : � ;�. ..r-•. .1;t>••+r..w'y.:'.ri..t�...,:.r:'.. 1: a.:ry t.r•:+°..:.,.w.::«y.. .ti,'.1 Y•4.1��t.,i4:f,!�L�;+.'.'� Ifl± �!•�! .r-i.:t : y, .- ,c,fti:..�.n•'.:f' ti,t: ,:1C;.,�,..•, i. F.. ,,�•,. d •• k71Ys[! r'.. _ i t RECEIVED eo�7: CITY A1TORNLY row r•'111PJT1fJC-Tn- P70 �u !5 329PHT MOLA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/WS AIMS AVE HUNTINGTON BEAp{C��ALIF 92646/cn4)536.2547 6994EP��LTJIII�'IM1�LvD,CA92009/VW)43&1157 HAND DELIVERED March 15, 1982 Robert C. Sangster, Assistant City Attorney CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Sangster: As per our conversation and your letter of March 10, 1982, enclosed you will find a Promissory Note to the City of Huntington Beach in the amount of forty eight thousand ' s'.x hundred dollars ($480600) . We appreciate very much your patience in this matter and the note will be paid as soon as our construction loan is funded, hopefully within . the next forty five days. If there are any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, MO DEV LOPMENT CORPORATION nk J. Mula, silent FJM/c;d enclosure cc: Charles Thompson, City Administrator C ' 1..1'1',Iv.!^1.+.'YfN.I. l1M R K•'rytt. r..... ....r. ......... •... .. ...... ..,,, , t...•-... .,r,»-..�.-• «+7r •-•. w.re..- •ter y,..'.. -n 1� . t l.. ....`... 1 '�rCa).µkJ..:y..'�••i.1't:..� ��.f T'. ,../,i{.1.< .�Yvr•,a'.. r J6� ;•��;t3�•tc�!''i�:4s7LM�L4F'ti�.�I%y± 1 PROMISSORY HOTS $118 ,600 Huntington Peach , California March R , 19R2 For value received , the undersigned promises to nay to City of Huntington Beach , California , or ordr.r , at Huntington Reach , California , the sum of forty-eight thousand six hundred dollars ($4R ,600) with interest on unpaid principal at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum , from the following dated: $32 ,310 from May 20 , 19R1 14 ,670 from June 12 , 1981 b00 from July 27 , 1981 1 ,020 from August 19 , 1981 On the lst day of July, 19H2 , the entire balance of the unpaid principal with unpaid interest due thereon shall be due and payable. In the event payor Makes installment payments , each pay- rient shall be credited first on interest then due and the remainder on principal; and interest shell thereupon conse upon the principal so credited. Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States. If action be instituted on this note , the undersigned promises to pay all rosts of collection, including reasonable att•orney' s fees. �. MOLA DEVEV'OPMEHT CORPORATION P.nic J . E'Ioln •re trident SEA L .•i,�,t,`.',ti''t. F,.j. .. ty+;.;,� ,�,, `,f•�,., c ..iC..�L7�:..:. .. 7-1 in .... .. _ ., ,.« r.-n,-w•v._�.......ry:.+vw�y1+w( �w..� oec4firr aka IN'lI1F' Superior Court �• OFTIM S'i'ATF:OFCALIFORNIA In and for the Vot:nly of Orange t OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY CLERK CITY I'Iiflfl�tlF(,11n►.IrATInN Public Hearine 10853 •rw+-!"!r`:*;.�?,•I:ATtc}ifKt�171faCltr,1�'�'t�.J�--••..I.�,.-w.+!�•.�y�� •�`� :.:-:.�• ,,,.�..aefs.Ac.Tnsr:>tia a ', .'i.�t.t;�„� }f�,,,, -Stale ofCalifornin It•ttatsasttt�ri;}tl#gllltlllf''r;:'>...r*t <l`. Countyof Orange 1s't. Nnj1'f�lr ItFNt•711 t;1t},�;tlwE+n +a6-I" r'wat$ jItol,'if�•01iM+a+ruf.a kwt�'fef t.�tril 7rf ty l • Rita J. Richter �%q.1.e ltj".4• I I!ui0�ny..ill+.wN ltrtwt4l`»nmwL.n•'�ymt•l.j) fF ti *l:•+wak+ul,�•s ttitfdn, rl ,l�i Tha: I n•a and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of :mryf 1 r+...renrii�;:1 flit'i't.an"I n.. of ,tl: i+ ; the Unit.t States,over the age of twenty-one ��•'••fr r.11,i.,rla�lt lrrl�N tirl.{t,t,i.Mtrcwat+iwtq l> C.! anti that 1 .t"�,.�..�}:^.-'=•t'.}.' +'ii+t,,�(;1`.t•.;•�,��'' � .t�y„g4t..'� aryl not a party to,nor interested In the atmve entitled matter; ,;, t11 JJ.v'16-41J.r,l;t+;tro 1�tL.Y,r4;1.'k•ffwr�l4lw� that I am the prinripal clerk of the printer of the :'iUl�4{f�fe•tn1.t11wc�:'arr,.'erA1}..) :tvinra'iltf3l�,i r{..gl. y(ftilllf'lat' a� {! (Z A ii'1`++1.fun •rwr t«.-,f( hw I'm 1•M1,:yss.Nwa iTlttvl ilfl� � akakir'�(Ya ' .t HUntingtun Beach Independent Review ti, ',' :, ':.�,:_,;,s.l • l=• lt,tt+ 'I7MHfr S,!!.•�l"'•f, ='t/ ry�•� �r�' i', f t�.Yfi'f,' -! :;a ttti `+1` s�1 l T1(1pp1t1.S'ti1r1�Tt1.�MIS.1ly� ant•wspsperof general circulatlun,published fn the City of �.'�',•�i,, .��.:r.t..�':•• _ �.h .tlJf'l. 11:11, Ytltgffl'Sttra+•r�}at' �#, ,'J'!1 ��'�� t1rt l k•�,.?Y,t tr:V+r.i•N:�lwr'.1; S+ Huntingtt.n Beach ► ;s;i;n ;l t' � , I.;;F: , ti;•�:: , '>,.;b`.• ; .;« : 'Ifwnl,ll..n6teJ.It{.';'ttrvll7r „� �'�1 ' ,nt��;• :'•.S, .t^� r";4*�e.h�'� 1:.,.,.. r .... :r.,✓.f ,.. :.=3..'..J..f li`:t'.•,�iw t.C.•o-„��.. ,%.!in3:.L,rit.a:•la:. County of Orange and which newspaper is published fur the diseminatinn of local news and intelligence of a general charac- ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a twna fide sul►sJ:ription list of toying subscribers. and which newspaper has been established,printed and pub- lished at regular intervals in flit said County of Orange for a period exceeding one year, that the notice, of which the t=nnexed Is a printed copy,tax teen published In the regular and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement thereof,on the following dates,to wit: January St 1981 I I certif;t(or declare)under penally of perjury that the forego- ing is ttue and curtrct. Dated at..................Gavle ove............ t Calibirala.•th' e.. nuaryrifl..8r1�-. �S�s:store 1 wJ Donn Ho.CAF•g13A0 .,.y1.•'';";]" r .,.:: , .... - .: ,•. eu ..n,.. •.— . r.,.. .1. . -,. - .._•- — _• a...._. ..- .i_ ......... .�.-..,. .., SJa.41.T.:":,.w. +f i.Li,.—�T+ 4 ` • - f a .�.. . . ..�� rho_.�• .�.Tl�Y�r�I1 —yV.�Mw.�. '.. ...y�y.. .y� ;,.rw.. V Publish 1/8/81 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PC APPROVAL OF TT #10853, CUP #79-23 & EIR #80-5 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 19th . day of January 1981 1 for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Huntington Beach Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract No. 10853, Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23 and Environ::nental Impact Report No. 80 5, a request to construct a 224 unit planned residential development`pro3ect on a 12.54 acre site located on the east side of { Bolsa Chica Street approximately 650 feet south of Warner Avenue. A legal description is on file in the Developmn. Services Department. i .i All intereste6 persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach. California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 i DATED . January CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk :j t "•`.^^.«w-n ass-w.sxarr.;w..,.»weu:. , ..,.-.....�....__ _ .......�.... ':•.I'.'+�..j:.. .'7 • "�a•i'^........'s:. �. .-.i'.:.+n•.r� _..r.,...+.+'1:"i f(w:..i.i i<i S..... .'.C.: a ..'A....:.-?^r,.-,+�+•}f'?""'TT�1 C.U.P. 79-23,TT 10853 Page 1 of 3 df appeal to C.C. 12-31-80 df 1.3-131-01 163.131--21 163-121-30 :;ola Development Corp . Iferbert V. Swanigan Barbara E. Baker 808 Adams Avenue 17132-A Harbor Bluffs Cr. 17042 Bolsa Chica Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, Ch 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 . ....... 163-131-11 163.131-22 163-121-31 ivy K. Ong Tr. Hilary K.H. Chan Jean M. Anderson 3321 Seaview Aver::je 9812 Kings Canyon Drive :17062 Bolsa Chica Street Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 fluntington Beach, CA 96246 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 163-131--12 163.131--24 - 163-121-32,33 Ann J. Larson : Frark B. Clendenen Thomas Karaon 5142 Thorn Tree Lane : 250Poppy Avenue P.O. Box 127 Irvine, CA 92715 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 : Sunset Beach, CA 90742 163-131-.1.3,15,2G i 163.121-21,25 163-12' .04 crank:i:. J. Buccella, Tr. John D. Tokaruk Richard R. Rule 3541 Courtside Circle P.O, Box 1657 5052 Warner Avenue Iluntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 9264? Huntington Beach, CA 92649 163-131-14 161-121-22 163•-121-35 ! Jane Co Ayers, at al Rodolfo Espinoza Frank K. Wynia 17151 Harbor Bluffs Cr. 5121 Dunbar Avenue 3970 Grand View Blvd. Apt. C fluntington Beach, CA 92649 : Apt. 23 . r Huntington Beach, CA 92649 : We Angeles, CA 90066 ! 163--131-16 163.121-23,27,36,37 163-121-42,43 Clark S. Beardslee, Jr. Janet T. Moody 17481 Hillgate Lane : 4641Los Paton Drive : Alexander 1 Crosmaja fluntington Beach, CA 92649 9 : P.O. Box 1123 t fluntington Beach, CA 2649 ; Huntington Beach, CA 92647 1 163-131-17 163.121-24 Z63-121-45 { Nelson If. McCrady Stephen F. Downs You-Min Chi 11.O. Box 2220 16311 S. Pacific Avenue 5172-D Dunbar Avenue Seal Beach, CA 90740 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 16 3-131-18 163.121-28 163-121-4 6 Tom Stadel Martin B. Slatta Chung I. Suit 3456 Plumeria Place 3622Serene Way 11354 Michelle Street !; Costa Mesa, CA. 92626 Lynnwood, Wash. 98036 Cerritos, CA 90701 � 163-131-19 .. . � 163.121-29 163-121-48 11 Don K. Louie Paul11. Penrod : Margaret E. St. Onge }I 1445 Camino Meleno 5021Dunbar Avenue 24001 Muirlands Blvd. i Santa Barbara, CA Huntington Beach, CA 92649 : Space 363 j • : E1 Toro, CA 92630 .. ' I 11+ -++,,::�::. .. ..::. .. ... 'a:r `-- .. ra+,,,.,•_....-.. ,.. ... .1. .. «.._....... •,.., ,.. .uv...,...w-.'✓.;.. •.ti:..v.:"k.w. Y.. ^��s ,^l-I C.U,p, 79-23 Appeal 1,age 3 of 3 df 163-•281-06 The Can�.ridge , Mrs. Dianne Fort 17192 Greenleaf Street Ankirk Development Corp. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 15 Bi.00khollow Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 163-281-15 City of West Covina Ted G. Tucker i Plannin; Department 4931 Seapine Circle : 1444 West Garvey Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92649 : West Covina, CA 91790 ................ ... . :.Attn: „Michael Miller .. ......... .,.................. . . 163-281-3.6 41 Edward J. Ramackers County of Orange Human 4952 Seapine, Circle Services Agency, public P Health & Medical Services, Huntington Beach, CA 92649: P.O. Box 355 Santa Ana, CA, 92702 ,• .. ,. .. . .. ...... . . 163-281-17 Attn: Robert Stone Denson E. Gouin 4942 Seapine Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92649 : '...... ..... .. .. ...........,.,.......;... 163-281-29 _ : South Coast Air Quality Mark R. Marley Management District 4961 Los Patos Avenue 9150 East Clair Drive Huntington BEach, CA 92649 El Monte, CA 91731 .163-281-31 : Attn: Ed Camarena Bernard Rubin 4981 Los Patos Avenue _ ..�....�� Huntington reach, CA 92649 is 1637281-33 ; : State of California Dept. ; Anthony fjartoli of Health Services 17202 Marina View : Hazardous Materials Manage»; 1:untington Beach, CA 92649 ment Section � 744 "P" Street ' 110- 014-78 ; Sacramento, CA 95014 Metropolitan Water Dis- trict of S. California P.O. Box 54153 Los Angeles, C:, 90054 } .. ........ . . 110r-014-79 Signal Bolsa Corporation 17890 Sky park Boulevard Irvine, CA 97714 .+pay-4i^f.'1,:,rwr+r.,c.•.+.H,++.Ca`::a:.-'w... ,rv.•+.••..-._.. .-._.._..,.....n,S*•,•;_: :•" ,.-'.»....�......_.,.. ^.^�-x.r:a::r.z:'v*sn�t:a++'.+�>7.+..CflE,t'ff..':.:17.I�.i�Ca�"m.R'1L�•�'r C.U.P. 79-23 Appeal Page 2 of 3 df 163-121-49 ; 163-043-22 1.63-044-08 'Pommy T. Nakachi ; Martin Bartaske Barry Spiegel 17901 Shamley Circle ; 17191 Greenleaf Lane 17182 Greenleaf Lane luntington Beach, CA 92649 ; Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 i 163-122-•06 : 163-043-23 163-044-09 Byron L. Ryberg : Harold B. Seifert Dianne Bono 17062 Leslie Lane : 17201 Greenleaf Lane 17192 Greenleaf Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 : Huntington Beach, CA 92649 . Huntington Beach, CA 92649; 163-122-10 ; 163-043-25 163-044-10 William A. Wood : Stanley O. Krom Leonard Arsulich i •.17092 Harbor Bluff er. : 19441 Surfdale Lane 5251 Kenilworth Drive � Huntington Beach, CA 92649 : Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 163-043-01 : 163-043-26 163-044-11 Thomas L. D'Allesandro ; Marianne V. Brizendine Donald J. Dupont 5242 Vine?.and Drive : 17171 Gre -i1eaf Lane 5261 Kenilworth Drive . Huntington Beach, CA 92649 : Huntington Beach, CA 96249 Huntington Beach, CA 926AO. 163-043-02 : 163-043-27 163-645-07 Robert C. Hawes : Joel Babic Daniel D. Axnheim 5252 Vineland Drive . 17151 Greenleaf Lane 5252 Kenilworth Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649 : Huntington BEach, CA 92649 Huntington Bench, CA 92645., 163-043-08 ; 163-043-28 163--045-08 Richard B. Eason : Ted M. Scott Hilary J. Schneider 5261 Glenroy Drive : 5241 Glenroy Drive : 5242 Kenilworth Drive ttuntington Beach, CA 92649 : Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 9264! 163-043-1,9 1163-043-29 163-045-09 Michael W. Guest ; John C. Davis Paul J. Fritts 1.7231 Greenleaf Lane : 5251 Glenroy Drive 17222 Greenleaf Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 : Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 9264', t • 163-043-•20 • 163-044-06 163-045--10 .. .,...•......t LarryF. Roberts . ; Joseph R. Toombs = Robert J. Allen 17221 Greenleaf Lane 5262 Glenroy Drive 17232 Greenleaf Lane Euntington Beach, CA 92649 ; Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 9264j ...................: .. ................ 163-043-21 :.163-044-07 163-281-02 Dav,td M. Hanson : Donald M. Hatch : Charles :lermansen, et al r•; P.O. Box 605 17172 Greenleaf Lane : 615 17th Street Bedford, Texas 76021 : Huntington Beach, CA 92641.1 �.iuntington Beach, CA 9261 •r.«..y.,y... ....r.• .... .i• r,.�.+a..... ....t;ir . .. .... • ..... ....I ... . .. . •, ..--....�._ .......�+.Lx.: ..t..i YlNia'o. .�y. l'.4•:•,•..L.'t..M.. .+ �.•. RECKJEbT FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by James W. Pal in Department ,Development Services Date Prepared January 7 r- , 1$01 Backup Wohiial Attached x] Yet n No Subject � APPEAL ON THF, PLaNNiNG CO,*iMTSSTQN'S APPROVAL QF CONDITIQUAL USE+ PERMIT NO. 79-23/TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10853/AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 80-5 City Administrator's Comments, Approve as Recommended V r� Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: �! I I STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for consideration by the City Council is an appeal to the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23, and Tentative Tract No. 10853, a request by the Mola Development Corporation to construct a 224-unit condominium project on a 12.5 acre site located on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street approximately 700 feet south of Warner Avenue (see attached area map) . A portion of the site was formerly used for disposal of hazardous wastes. Also being appealed is the Planning Commission's adoption of Environmental Impact Report No. 80-5. The Planning Commission adopted EIR 80--5 with the finding that it is ade quate and in conformance with the California Environmental Quality' Act. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and Development Services staff recommend that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's approval of Condi- tional Use Permit No. 79--23 and Tentative Tract No. 1 53. The Commis- f lion and staff further recommend that the City Council uphold the Planning Cormission's adoption of EIR No. 80-5 as being adequate and in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. ANALYSIS: i Appellant: Dianne Fort 17192 Greenleaf Lane Huntington Beach, California 92649 Applicant: Mola Development Corporation 008 Adams Avenue ' Huntington Beach, California 92648 _ 1•�"'" .v . fir.. ,�• , ,. . ,. ., ...... .,.. : .. •, _ . .. ... .- _ :�-- -:�: - raT"r.mr� ! I I . Page *2 Location: East side of Bolsa Chita Street approximately 700 feet south of Warner Avenue. Request: To construct a 224-unit planned residential development. Chronology of Events: The proposed prefect has been under consideration by the City for approximately 16 months. The existence of potentially hazardous materialf- tin the site was brought to the attention of the Department of Development Services staff in September of 1979 by the California Regional. Water Quality Control Board. This initiated an environmental review process involving extensive consultation with other public agencies. _ The environmental review process for the r project is partially documented in the September 9, .1980 Planning Commission staff report (attached) . The following is a brief, updated chronology of the City's involvement in preparing environmental information on the project: September 18, 1979 through December 4 , 1979: The project was brought before the Planning Commiss on in 6 separate meetings. A: each meeting the project applications Were continued at the request of the applicant to allow sufficient time for preparation of information which had been requested by the Planning Commission. Finally on December 41 1979, when it became apparent that tie applicant's report on the effects of previous chemical waste disposal on the site would take a substantial amount of time to prepare, the Planning Commission with the concurrence of the t applicant tabled action on the project for an indefinite period. At the December 4 meeting, the Planning Commission was informed that the: appli- cant had voluntarily agreed to conduct additional subsurface testa on the site based on recommendations of the State Department of Health } Services and other concerned agencies. t In July, 1980, a report entitled "Environmental Assessment of Soils, Groundwater,and Vapor Impacts; at the Former Boucher Landfill Site" was t; submitted to the City by Jack K. Bryant & Associates. On July 31 1980, representatives of several public agencies which 4' had initially expressed concern regarding the proposal were invited to 1 a technical briefing on the report in Huntington Beach. The rpji:esenta- 1' tives of the agencies present agreed that complete removal of the hazardous materials on the site and disposal of such materials at a j . Class 1 Landfill is the most feasible and acceptable method of mitigating long-term groundwater, vapor, and soils impacts. It was acknowledged by all of those present that a short-term odor impact resulting from r excavation of on-site materials would be unavoidable. In a letter dated August 255119880, the South Coast Air Quality Manage- ment District changed its position, indicating that removal of the contaminated soils in the manner suggested in the Jack K. Bryant report would be unacceptable because of potential air quality impacts. On September 9, 1980, a study session was held before the Planning Commission at which the consultant, City staff, and representatives c : I t N" 11` I I Page 3 other public agencies presented information regarding the environ- mental effects of hazardous materials on the site. A special notifica- tion was prepared for the meeting, which was advertised in two newspapers and sent to all property owners within a quarter-mile of the site. On Strot:ember 16, _1980, a public hearing was held on the project. After addittioaal presentations by the consultant, staff, public agencies, and comments from the applicant and members of the public at large, the Planning Commission determined that an environmental impact report should be prepared for the project. The public hearing was continued, with the concurrence of the applicant, for a 91-day period to allow sufficient time for preparation and public review of the EIR. On December 16, 1980, the project applications and final EIR were pre- sented to the Planning Commission. The Commission approved the project with findings and subject to 31 conditions of approval on the conditional use permit and 6 conditions of approval on the tentative tract map. (See attached December 16, 1980 Planning Commission minutes. ) DISCUSSION: The proposed planned residential development consists of four main structures built over semi-subterranean parking and two conventional side'-by-side buildings without subterranean parking. (520 total parking spaces) The main entrance to the development is from Bolsa Chica Street. All buildings will have two stories, with the top floor units having a second story loft. The main recreation area consists of approximately 25, 150 sq. ft. and includes a recreation room, two tennis courts, a pool, and a whirlpool spa. The total amount of open space for the development is 275,082 sq.ft. The project was approved by the Planning Commission with a Special Permit allowing 7 units side-by-side on two of the four buildings located over each parking structure. Article 936 of the ordinance code allows no more than 6 units side--by--side. The applicant is proposing to restore approximately 3 acres of the 12.5 acre site to a usable form by excavating the on-site soils known to be contaminated with hazardous waste and transporting these constituents to an acceptable landfill facility. Past and present long-term impacts resulting from the existence of hazardous waste on the site are thoroughly discussed in the final EIR 80-5. Impacts associated with the proposal to excavate contaminated material from the site are discussed as well as alte::'native site restoration tec.Npiques and mitigation measures. The appellant views the release of airborne toxic gases and particu- late matter from the site during excavation as a "very serious threat" which "vastly outweighs any advantage to the City and the residents of Huntington Beach." It is the appel.lant's viewpoint that: "mitigation measures set forth in the EIR and staff report (December 16, 1980) do not reduce such a threat to an acceptable level" and therefore "it remains an unreasonable risk." The EIR states that excavation of the site could result in unpleasant odors, inhalation of very low levels of toxic vapors, and explosion or ignition of combustible or flammable vapors. In Section 9.0 of the final EIR, ,mitigation measures are presented addressing: a) onsite worker safety, b) onsite medical considerations, c) air monitoring for offnite safety, a) evacuation plan, e) procedures for. notrifirat?on .L s ' i',,, RWO � 1)1Sr,� 3 , 3x17'• 'i '''CJ.lr"`'k%y� 'ii, ��. 1;,. r :,�; ) ,), "'+;his � � �5#C;' 1 s Tyti'f; Y .•a. ,. ( a.r 1 ' 'r e t' 1 ' }'a} a t t r j t � � t Y' r,: }t�'v ZV 1. l .•47f #:r.n;r.�rf.,.!4!'.!i.t[ +et ��j��N` 'S`1 �. "tti,s9 ;4 �ta .b i:[4l'IM 4( {.r'�t<� L �j r7 �d•r�`,-3 4 �r ,•:i•'1 'ti!\';i� �i'. Y,. 1, l i rt,fy !(i�.[" t< ti:i r.Y F.; 7 I.� li ;r „�vi Y; t'f.,1tt� ,1 'r• °t �•,t r�.(•� 1 nC,e.r'eli�.i. t r<a.� � ,{,:r�. . a � y ��','� 4 i'�;r� '�aY. ,�J 7•' r \ T �.�' 7? ,a. 1 [ .L` .t,Y yvti�•Ij aa 1#.(7 ll�l,•t � �� ��,t,r .�`k�i,n a�,a^��. 'S, ri t'.�jF,$y'`1t S' fir,, "4•FJ,',�jr h� t t, �J#�/!t`ti Yid';�'��1 a�1f+JS1 C `� 1 ,15;� .R>SR � q rii�.`yr 4Y '.5��•x �' SG,t<#. k{:;�. i ! � � j�t: 1.� ���.�t 5P� .l tit '�.at.� kY.1.{S ' � yM. �.2`t t � �.t` "�1 S.'11.,• i�r`�l,,, .A .�iti, t lk � �'P r ��.r� rfL •'�s /IX r"•jF,'1 � F��;1 'f# },. '�tt� i+�'=4'S t�� �:: #.,••1. r,, a .; 1•' '�txE ,�.-[1 r'� � a,t �',k,..#' R d•�.a�{S,. r'p,2`,` �•r•y °• •4 �\}. tii t(.L.l.�j.,+��� if,�1t .'�!1( ! �.'ipt :;�,G�dY.. 4 �F.i�'1'Yl� u ,:t;Ytiij?.,!g Z� 1 �f irp' !rr. kt.t�l��`+ /p ,�,r l;.f �iti� �k ,�..1.Sr.�,f .�j^.,'� '' S�'(l�if '�l .1.� {? y) 1�' k +i 'F R1.11 "T4 t, �t i<'4.t. 'S�! lT�y.�i,S + r +Iw (&,f.i� f� ( 1. ts��'.t•,�'1I] ,�+ �,i r� t ' �4..�".Rfl,t•/r.'•'+1'r"•.1. y ( •;1 ,!�t�t F� t• 3' �'�'4t� 71< t F � .t#S ; -y •� rye y,A� ,, �� ��•• t•t:'r. / 1� �? � � ;� \� ,e:l �. .1: 4,vR J.t. +'•} 4A� a.fxi r ��\t.r�,Y; x.r yM.tt r R.AA+ x 1�tit �kt CP�,�) ,r[5i=. f :i�t ��tA t i,•t .1.;'F ¢+ ° �� %i:r�}+`� f.�R::4..,:i:,+..d. \ •'t ��+�iK 1r�t i��.+',, trt iJ+t',d� t5✓• f l!1 ! � 4t J. (�Lt �i it ...[ ♦, "}ji')() ^yr. .tS �.:Si,.x,'v kfYt }+ �r t' '1'•.t-�:'�':`t':t,,Ga 4 4 f .��tt�. t w, r} Y, ;x -.7 .ti a i '.t: i:'. + i ii4a 4a'1f1•}A'�I' t13 r. '� t F ,, fir i + n� ,S:.'{;. � ,1,�5 °�' "�1.{'! rr�..�•�;'�. x ,.Y«f', as',.t` i`'�'�1,'�;•tl r �[ :1�1, ti, , 4`•r!{�i�Z,,111, It.;: ,( t,'t�c„t�>+ rt'�; +,•} yl.t .1 j. { 4 t 5'1.5 'siy£ .G� a., 4 t •4+A:.t, titl:F}f� t r ] :.,;tt1 �, rt'Ft, ,fir '�t t�: 1:'�4 Z1 .,J . '7 } 4 ( Y�i i ":}yt f'i••'t a t• i, f:"'''•3lfJ1�4f � ..1r S f„`. t,.f+. Yt. � �.,+)t,\,r (t, h 1 a�:4 ��N Y.�.i.r Y .t rr,tri, 'i/i ,}t IP'�i "if r' .Z't=){i,"+T�•.?:, i.j. :. ,( ti4, .� f„1#tt + '�,' +L� a �lr! +.tp It ti i�`t . :i F 1 G• . 4 t`Y n' `l r.� #1 tf.7�[f�t=t�:d'!�)t\i .�°, �`•�tff:��r�}:j, • V. +! !, •+,�t. ), 3.i '!'f'li {.f / , .r;t•, r'.;1.�4 �.1�' f. ,l,+.l att •',17 f r 4 to YF.n�: 1 q t lxl r• } , � r c 1 ,y .l AC i 1.r � r;,�•r.) u �+ ���t,P ., F....'#'.Il ��� � t xl+:�• r ...•1 k ti ,�i'1`x�t �� � ,i� t x 4 i� titt'! S i� ,'s�° k r 1 .\ ,� ' ,tr 1 v.x ,. L , l�t, 't e 1 j x-a. �.+.t- t >. irY 3.ioi.�fwrrl+4i.wiL4{J.i�t--�: .�rS 7 lift � rl�l�£�i Stt Xl�li k + .'('� ai'' i'rt 'l:•`•t,�Y,t rl.fit._<<'Y r+a i i Page '4 of residents of the grading operation and evacuation plan, and f) hazardous waste excavation plan. These mitigation measures were incorporated into the Planning Com- mission's conditions of approval for the project. In addition. the Commission required that prior to the City,s issuance of a grading permit the developer shall submit a contract to the Planning Ctj=mIssion verifying that a Class 1 landfill is willing to accept the hazardous waste as well as a firm proposal from a qualified laboratory ind;..- cating the type of equipment to be used for air quality monitoring on the site. The staff has requested the applicant to prepare a separate plan of action assigning specific responsibilities to all parties participating in the grading and, if necessary, evacuation operations. This specific plan of action will have to be approved by the director of Development Services and the State Department of Health Services prior to issuance of a grading permit. in regard to potential health effects resulting from excavation of the site, the State Health Department in its letter dated September 3, 1980, stated that "there may be short-term odor problems associated with this alternative (excavation) , but we believe this can be con- trolled by appropriate grading techniques and chemical treatment. Acute exposure to workers can be controlled by proper personal pro- tective equipment. If vapor concentrations found in the gas wells are representative of the vapor content in the fill and if they approximate worst case conditions, their emission during excavation will probably not pose a health hazard to residents in the surround- ing community, considering dilution effects and short--term exposure time. " Prior to preparation of the EIR for the project, a letter dated Auaust 25, 1980 was submitted to the City from the South Coast Air Quality Management District in reference to the preliminary analysis prepared by Jack K. Bryant & Associates. AOMD's opposition to exca- vation of the site,was cartially based on the following statement. r "The community will be exposed to airborne toxic gases and particulate matter. The Bryant report does not provide sufficient information to I determine whether the concentrations of such materials in the air will ! be sufficient t: pose a threat to health in the exposed community.,, Jack I:. Bryant & Associates met with representatives of AQMD and established the modeling parameters necessary to provide this In 1 formation for inclusion in the draft EIR. AQMD's subsequent comments addressing Cie draft EIR made no reference to the sufficiency of in- formation regarding health effects. The Planning staff recently re- quested clarification on this issue and was told by Nathan Zlasney of I AQMD that they have no expertise in determining health effects and AQMD's Opposition to the proposed project is based solely on the possibility of odors causing a nuisance during excavation of the site. t At the December 16, 1980 Planning Commission meeting, the staff briefly discussed two memorandums from the City Attorney dated October 7, 1980 and November 14, 1980 (attached) whicy. address the applicants responsi- bilities for off-site soils analysis and the effects of recent aecls- lation pertaining to hazardous wastes on the site and on surrounding residential properties. The October 7, 1980 memorandum of opinion essentially concludes that an applicant cannot be required to perform soils tests off-=site as a condition of approval for a tentative tract or conditional use permit application, and that the proper procedure to refuse issuance of a building permit because of passible gas ��- migration onto adjacent property would be f i f I��L"��'f•4a�`,��''?3; 1 ,y ��a� C'ltG' �j+;sC � �! ,�,;}!} 14,r,� � }lyrll,,�y��iro�7��;� tf�,l i �x' 1i 7 1T 4 r"1 , % M Vi 1,0M r U MA i M Ib i fj. I o 111 4f fi i I N,j V, . .......... Page 5 to obtain a court ordered injunction to temporarily halt the construc- tion. The December 4, 1980 memorandum of opinion discusses latid use restrictions imposed on property adjacent to a hazardous waste site subject to AB 2370, which became effective January 1, 1981. A repre- sentative of the State Department of Health Services will be present at the January 19 City Council meeting to discuss the implications of this bill. EW11RONMENTAL STATUS: On September 16, 1980 the Planning Commission required that an environ- mental impact report be prepared for the project. The environmentax impact report (EIR 80-5) was prepared by the environmental consulting firm of Jack K. Bryant & Associates. A representative of Jack K. Bryant & Associates will be present at the January 19, 1980 City Council meeting to present the major findings and conclusions of the EIR. In accordance with Section 15160 of the State EIR Guidelines, a draft EIR was widely distributed for a 45-day public review period to allow other public agencies and members of the public at large to review and comment on the document. The draft EIR, the comments received during the public review period, and the City's responses to the comments constitute Final EIR 80-5. Prior to taking action on the appeal to Conditional Use Pe rmit 79-23 and,. Tentative Tract 10853, the City Council must certify that' .. ..th. ' final EIR 80-5 has been completed in compliance with CEQA and e State EIR Guidelines and that the City Council has reviewed and con- sidered the information contained in the EIR prior to making its deci- sion on the project. Standards of adequacy for an EIR, as stated in Section 15150 of the State EIR Guidelines, are as follows: "An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision makers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences. An evaluation of the environmental effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in the light of what is reasonably feasible. Disagreement among experts does not make an EIR inadequate. The courts have looked not for perfection, but for adequacy, completeness, and , good faith effort at full disclosure." L MM I r. Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE COURSE OF AC TION: Three alternative courses of action to the proposed project are discussed in Section 11.0 of Final EIR 80-5: 1) The no-project alternative; 2) alternative restoration techniques which share similar objectives to those of the proposed project; and 3) alternative odor control measures., �`t'/S r s � r e +r' i'•,' k Afl;}, - '4r i' '�7 r,w..r t 7. , r �5 5 Y , ty .i'••� i1' ,µ� 1�� t�� r�j 5 ('T•Y "'x � `Y t F Z�� t ! .P+ �.i. '.b �„ tY •� , k p � l J t { ... A l• �j y,}• i Y t�'t�,'JI"4j •� S ,, 4 �.. �t .."!�9 � � t rah #'i.l w �Y ��,i• Y � S ,;K � ,j"`t y S P�' t � �yy�• 5' r t t p1• 1' ,� r. , .. t Yj t { .Y•. T.c t+. y, t t xaY\ ,Y�{ . P t� T }If: .te t s k4 4 . �7���" �,•� �1 d ! �l� 1J_� Ow ;� #' b, '1y , ; ; �,i?v. .� . � ,,^. PAj , w; /t1'Tr � 'y .•)�Y. 7 {�w ..;!'. 'lt 1 i :t.,f " {1 + 4rt > . t_ll \ .Q �• � !!ll} ,"t r ,. a �' tt4ittt, tC x tt �< tii5 f.. .'t•r't.s+dljd � f t��"•, I.1 f (y ilc�V ` r.t,f»�y. 7di+lit p�Ytt iY i+frJ l �,,�lI,K ,, '� •, �,�Y �,'(.�•. ,{rF'M.' G. , +.,}+• k}�t1 f. +{{.'���''//y�x .,�fiN^+� �?1 h�y3 y^fxiC 4` 't, ? . ��Y',r �' S '3f7', ��. •tt, r�c;+ 14 1��.4• (�;�titS;l Y.? t.Y �`� �'t L4 -1r4r �'�,� � 3 „�,4 ' . ..+� i•.',S.�Z)•[}tdry 7',y ►P; a�t�• � ' ,.! 1 y,,zf t + (° ;} "WIN 1 + l t. �'. , }*, j,�• ,.p E 4 t' t'i3ti• '{ lT •'�\ � • ,t� I'• 9 � ;1 •d! 1t'J,`� }' ,• } t i A � ' k �tR,.J,a.S. At p; 1 '1 As t'+4 +S-��'•�G,l�. �Y.} / s' • i• t ',F'r f y.�*, 'R } � 5 aft ,h / "a f� t• i n I'P. i x �'r\` j� +, `t \•. S.tir,. 4'.4•'Y y.. ) Tt �� �' Y4�,., 4't\ a t` 'r a � k•�? t� to i 4. r' "� '�.'f � A�i ¢ l� j 1, a L 4;.� +,�� � i c. d{ � .�, 1 . I t •� v;�Y { ct �'`Y �."r •.< ,'F��" �'�J:" ��7tf),•7 :, �},,. .y �r, C�(.,}�� �'1. �`iq d �i �� ��• t�. �1f ,..,;�#+t-. d�9#•r ,? ►: `,?.�M. 7, }�n��5.,;�j��' t+i 1' �l ��.t.j' 'Z. ,}`�, � 3 h .'t•:' '1 t,� �,�{ r �k d d`4 r ��'��lY,1T ,t.R��i•,Y�Yf���,i�' J.•(,�:�a d��Y ,h; �, � T��, .j J�ti l.,Y �e.)j)r+ 61 �� �n�a�Y��Yt�.t .a t s }���tt,t.� � :M�:�4' 47�{'(: � .4 > ti+'e, tt'r.l°� J t`,',4 t::!'�rf n[5 (�(j�,'� �•�tSY.!�`5,y.., t y �. tY it \ ".'f t� iz,'A II 'lt t (7 l 7 • Page 6 i SUPPORTING INFORMATION: I. Area Map 2- Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations 3. Letter of Appeal 4. October 71 19801 City Attorney Memorandum of Opinion 5. November 14, 1960, Memorandum from James W. Palin to Gail Hutton 6. December 4, 1980, City AtU)rney Memorandum Opinion 7. December 16, 1980, Planning Commission Staff Repor— and Minutes B. September 16, 19R0, Planning Commission Staff Repo-t and Minutes j 9. September 9, 1980, Staff Report and Minutes � Respectfully submitted, t� f: l amen W. Pa in r1 Director I E , JWP:JRB:df Y 1`. S^ �•r•• l a. •��1 ,c• ,4t..f:+,,��.r,,h..+?Yj. ,.;; �.r�..•., ..,,. •r,S•a•.,z r x., .,. -,. ...r. ._.>�:s+rc:.r.[;sar+.y:.'tf..:.[L'\tL•.r,T'L:7trtS..r•�«C �?:':':Ji.w., 'T ', + ' Y. 4 'r• '-►. , .• a ••� ryii -i Y+kit;t 1 �, •7tY' •t * �F` S t1' C•''1` 7 ^'S' y1N"�. Jl '•� it, r � S, lt'+ 1',r�+(I F 1_ ,S '+,.�r fir• +� ,� y SY �d7 wt�i to E r ;c. �,,, '.���,, a��c.y '�1' � '� `f•��4�� ,���. � �.�11, •{�� � '$ '1 ' t F Y iix } A y 1V i.iir r iP + ,r ti y i� �t ;�t` C•''. y�l t X �t;t �' cr�k7.�k ! f. i '' j'1 tiY.t .. At i •, y 7 } ya} 4 t�• Z 1 / r.. It s' y ..�.� ';3;{ �t Tf��+ � 'ti't" � j_� �`•7�!;'• t} lit+r "�Y'i.t`:. + c� }/u�;L.x ;•i•.��,"� tt �i �t.`i;-' '� � ,)•: '''>;��� � 4�'L::4 r � }1i',Ff�,rSp�t. 4. a.t .tS�ax ty(+h ty :.''� t :1}' ,,y{ �1�- .i�I��t ;.• �` �1+ x+1. 1£t� {• 1 �1'"1�„ {( 151 ,14 �� i�a' ti �S,�.L .� r l.r,� .�' I{A t 1.'}�F }t i�`i; l '•i, .i ,:�' .Q t.` u � ' �i°j(� t4�' �7..f�'x r �� t :t ���,'tf' d�tJt Y!,5y 1�1`" �x t;',^. ��t.#'}. tr, .Y, e,:�! rft q 4! 99 �!'f{�},a c r` �11��� t�s�! � F � 7' a,i .} ,11,,}�. 'qq,, r rb y iSS ..t ,•. t t'•�, > iJi, '( �, �"� �:� •,� 3A rr a'�7.�{i u 1`f. _ �} � .Y• P i/j ,,, i�';)1�A,t7� 1,� , C[` }: ItY>. �`+Y ,�` .�. �•i, 1��+• � ��}.�Y /. tip. F� � f f {:Pt�t' �, �^ ,r ��A�t.3 Y' ! (,�..�fit. .�A1•.rs.�. 'aU' i 1 7 �dsJ+ I-! '�, l,•� ,' -�',t`��' S„ r,��f.x �.. t,..A,�{{pp{y�{4 ff��Aih�;+,'�t��;i ,}�� �,�ti1;..tj,��,t �-��r.x'��. }, :R},,{w,��•� �'-q.+; 'y }}�!•,f( �:, �( ly��> �, tljJ .�� •��.�. �, ��•. �y w. } ,y � �, i}} {R'"l� ,t .15t yf�.,,,,Y��. !.'q,�"4= �`•.'r{r';1{f�.x.7�t,�' '1 Mq} �►.IV,';c�,/ , t"'S'i��i � t ,y7.�,'Vd ,�:,t♦i�l'i'�i� ,.'�'t ,`\y`.(y�...14.�i'! 1, �4�'t,,l,F{,y'�•� s+ 5'�" � eFy�I•Z !r .tF! '�f�3 :t, ,'`r \�! ' 1 %Y ' k > x1`r :�S rl. :{}t r} P }[6�r Y Itl xyfFx' } ,L ,4 �'.1l:�. �,�++ 't M },} =v. 1»'r'.it..r '`�'r y' �. ;:1.? ,;;,�:t,�,�t,t•it�tti .•r'i`1,0'��t�rrr,?i:'� <+i, ,•1�• Y „t !:1�r,7lt�a•,,i c�ir� �V ,:�r�t. :.�.j{(E �'�Y<'�i 'LZ•. } ', ?;7 w` {,tt �'t•- �:xrt� ,t� f x �r � .I � 1>' .� +i �r d 1Q. "si'1 i,� !• l�fl}.�l rlr, �' k� �t1�{ (, tt} ♦ 1, �; `�` l�.'•b• '�'4 t 1 t,: Y x5 x'' (':•ta � x i r, t �5.-'�I.. .- fir. YL+a R1', f.r.1t7't�i T } !� �•�:� `�4c.h.a71{]1S{�.`t;S.{i�Y+•d ?`r,�� �•1,� .t;t 7•rz�i P/ 1r�3 tt(� Y f.'; ) ,:•i,i'{i t Y .vfi,.ttt i�•�.,Sti yc.i y�+,#}£3 .i} +4'•.Yt c(� t "�if'��s rA•rr. a•, 4,. .,,�i2 1.wltweii'.,vr•tlt`x}, ,�l.r ,Jix �.yrtl �FJf.`•r�t�A,�"�:'c;L A`,,I.'�'itif'. .� ���' £, �" r. I�� t'{�ti }a. !•, ..#t.t•. ?'}l. I;e! Y 't-;�'e �f � t{t .) ., . i _,•, t��{ X 4r..:.ii.xfF:)'` G Y.�t��4�,1x..<;S"S I.th�, • +b ;H.>,. ,�J,�.. Y..R�+ .'�'i1�' "�tk�,t, 1 � 't11f 1�'•�: A � .0 i.7 ;�A ,��i�. }.y t,a i Y t t�' P r i, Y"' �"� : v y."()�yt�i �', tf yr'"';t r ,�},>+� ..�. 5t.n.4;;t. A xj t $', { t�r~.!1 : IId ri\�3y,xiiy Tt.-d ts. r.'r Ar ! +',, t'• ;XS. } s�' r i{'wutlaf.t.e'.tl.lyy r.rrL.�7 \.� Q.�• llr.,C-Y.Ay .t.�}.. .� •7 I,t �'���-.�" :�� , :,t�e��,}: 3•u�Y �' .1 ,,:� t':. y� i y,•,t (,, f� ;.' � 4 ... Yrh Y+' •�n,rwtxil �hxY,t ;r .. >• �1�'•tyr.s,�^R :�'{�r �� {:PtiY.i¢. f}`, �� f,;.t"�:fI�Y.•�,6,7`•Y'•� YrS,. �� �:y::�t}1:'•Q`��.�f,�<�'if�, �t r:y5�.,.�q+�R ti'(`iy�; �'7(1�{Y?'�'s�tf+rr�ty:{+•�•;i.;'�t �,'C;+,t4�'{r�tiFa�i'lxyt wif tR•,y',y�4447i�i�"y�{{11sf}�,.�.�rF�+�'.,fsRfkt,ti ,t'G• ,(,i7�.'+.ast} �t � �i R• i t,t�f�t�;sr.lL`,. �•.e �1,�t ,w1•C:tS'� .x,. tt'r�, �r�'ti'.rsr, t' ',Y�: t. y��� .A�;i 3 Y;2 tl .fit1' )� �.r,l� �,�,tc'(fit+{'.,L"�ii t �l iti�`�t-',•{ 1t , 'itt�t�{�+���Fb, 'Fr 4 h� . { Y t5 )�i�k,. t j ?�t.�•�t�,�'-�.`3-, i. � ^xt.r�` f1 j�u��15:��ii2ty�Ya�ti:• �3�Y,y�"`_'•iyy't•"P'it'7�L,irltlirr�+t7r..1�4{.�y`it-1���t''�'��, �f�. � t'.,li'tu'lt�i�t ,,t'�;,Fr • r Y' LIJ Ld . LL: �t ,4+w.i � 1/T Cf�11T�. \•�,�` ' t/ �. , jI y=j � rz Is cr •It�' 7it�wr 1tl ` 'r:,� I C� Fw•°.i ~��'L)il IN _sa a .01 rl Lrl CO 0 a: a � ; rn �� r � •✓i•�• s 1 �,y I A cJcr o 1 M Q1 M f cc � LC •'c ' _ _�.ar+-•.-•.. .___.__..._-......•.«�'. .. ...,• -..- _.._....•r.•x+•v:xiJ:c".. ....'CL. i.at'�•'1:'TS�...'.:Fi�ti,e�:a .tw...+Yt •N t•"+,i J',•�"i+.�'it"•4,Y1q.,.t:♦�fi F:w�•...i��N'' ., , .• tir•. • t' - �I �.• r+t 'r ;(�:�• ,� f � 'yr. St¢y hf`/t{1�1i4���4+ f'f` ,,}� t, ,�1y, ,A4 ,� ,xt �1. �,.r,'Y �t i F +' ya �1;f:'4fr� �`. °•,�}Y,4':,lw'�,.5' �� �' t � +�?+:f x r "f`.j', NYt T Ill}�i, tt ''}y s11(jh'��' .r �n !;�Iyti �. "•+.nc '*'.{ t1 h �i��;.; fit y,i t F j•+n7�. o.%ri Nj',, ,•'l �y ,' f! ,•' `' ` r t� ' ' 1ik {: f�+" �'i +� r b."th s '4 t A.'t,,cL 5� . �],"� r+: i'��i•,�y,j w;?•i. INK NUN' ' �w:•. '{' ':S'Y�i'; � � `t �}tt � 't,` tt; it i, ;:iY*•t ,1;•(to 4�7' t�.,7t. t��j�ffy�. i 4tr�'AS'i A 1 1 �'}'2 fY I•�``,Y• 4 hh i n,i i2;, ��tr,, �..'•�I n ,}. n �+a�y i'tf. •���,' �r' �1 s� 4F, t � .�� +. �" p••r�.• � �' ,t•'�j..i•`} .%I,, ,f. ? s ,'Y [ A;I,. 1 ra v. : .p .. t,� 4`',r ��� 7L ..k'a � :•,.{�fitsy ,. .�, 1f'G F .. , t r.1�7..C�t }�ipi �r�,,e cr:� �( 5 3�:' ,l`,� 3i1� �;h'�t{ ,2�i §s 1 :A�. 4. kS � 1�.t• t .�I;,4.'1��,� a, �ts5't���t t��ip, ti" t4�•���;s�� . ;tii �t.�:o���zT�}�• <f?-,'fie+�tv ! N.g�1• ct.�y t•3 r � t ttu tY,, � t j�.,..;.. p .yt'!.� .,;' .�w. {�1�..c..t' }•' t r; ��r �" �"�•,'t��:�. f.��.��•'v r !}1,z Yr ,),t:.hi+'..••"'.}}�1A dS r.1",, �►. v;?• ,'� �a'!l i� A. t i'Ci'; 'i�!°1:: �i.� ���. '� r �. } 'F� p: 1�, tr4 l``L.'`s1ot +s ;Yl,,,•4!�:S!y' r �y'.S 3,``�j. y' t;� � ��„lt,., t.��,{h<. {, �t'�roi. � 1f11�) a ?.�jr�wy � 1,�j�.�'+•: 4Y /yy��`�j!;{`'� � .���. yt .�. I+Y• t "1';t [�}r ..sl Y {-,, 4 �ttl ,,•,,.,1 ir'[h'1*.{}�r�,'Y,�!�••i�`'��,''�,..+�lf�. s'+.`...1it� ;"J. l.'f .'� {,�.yt�yn-S�.r4 .`t'tl;.�+ >;c �,�7�•�M.'�:.�".A.. �'Is �f`}•.{1'.I�•'/;Y''7 f�aY'f 41' Y. 1t' '( t �: 1. 'i+•`'��"�,tt1 �f ,�•Y �,�', "tL{ �L. ft..,t Y. .C» i':r .ft Y; � .� s '9 ,z r S X �• '1t i'� ' t i �.�•~ 3��i. � S r� tart, � f,fa {+ ht' 1 , j'4�,+ :"k•r r 'e 4 rlrr'�E` � ` `` i 1 i �. � �.•� � �'.� `4 � yp{�fis, ,:{� '75''4.i, f'^'�..�/t'��; ,, �",{'+,,j�y?, �,�; sstt y{ ,rt Sy�l' i't "S,r,,;. , #`1�t{�(,1[!. ?;r ..t,?y'4 "'y � �1. ' 3t Ott �t(?,� ,?, e••,� F ti1`� .;4y(+ i .r; I.}kt,,E����(,��iia L�2 t�9�i'�5,.;•0�•!'. �s.���'t��'r?'��• s{��i�.a�+ IIY�,Is'y '{�S�u{vi44R��� � t.Cyf�r 'J;YJyfy, t ������� 3?:_�.t'` r�t�t' `� ��`'L �� �•.4hC► ��'r i r' a •i v 'u'.3. S i ' t T {f � !31 Y,.y' 1 A �• ` i �� 7. CoVIV OF HUMINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPAATPOENT COMMUNICATION IR10i/TIsVG1DsY CA.tCH To Mayor Ruth Finley Fram Alicia M4 Wentworth? City Clerk subject Appeal to TT 10853 and Data November 25, 1981 CUP 81-26• 01ithdrawn) Attached for your infonaation is an•,appeal which ktas filed by WON N MPS, Cvjiyt � and Mr. and Mrs, Besur egard to•the-FC--approv&l of TTAGB53 �, $ai�ggd gnd',CUP 81-26, Also included is theie letter withdrawing the appeal, This appeal was not advertised or scheduled for an agenda as the BepArtment pf ' Development Services was meting with-the appellants to resolve thtsituAtion, Savoy Bellavia is familiar with the matter if you have artyr questions, #; f i • f f � fd i. ' •t i .1:• \j 'irf }!� ,...^«..�,-•- - .,.. .—, '�.:n.z.r..i.✓:a�:y: __r`_. �. ,�` +:ri,nr.•+-.+r•.wrfW'.,.{t�.f7:�.:r7t'.:.z,titixY.(i�YifiT.�717".,,iT.4,'6,�,.:.w•".'�Z9`''� r Z" 7:9 F{ 2• �,a A w '� f J'rA"5 1 '� %1„t!^' t 5 t yr F4 14 'LL� r•. i y/ 1 p r• . " ti' ,p y est.. 1.. MSr F'w Y''. ? " 1..tlk,tY'V7dir�Y �•1� h "x'�[., N.irk[ �1t� �,� •�� Y t 'it f :i`• ks' \I + F � . Ttu,, +: [, ;`�I' S�•{. � 7 ' '�h y t, f+: t �es�•� c,17z t91' r fP�, �' 3�Y •..�t� �'3 t�• a'S�� ^'1�,1l•� rt� � e �• lr+,� ,��+�• j,�;+P 4�[ 1 `r��. i »��`r "r��d' L •Y P !"a� g � � f �', jay��S�D.7•"i�. `�"1 �d`�,. •t'1"' tlr'P 1s���y ry { i r t Y !Y41�r 3 y`4,1 1'•'�/v,� `. f?n:7'S .r t. V..4�ry� � +''�Y�M''S•t.}�'Z' , . 'tS.G ,t,..dt3.p�".^��� ''Ir�x��.,k)r}(yf•[x t}:�}�1 �fKF► ff;y t +9, A��� l' '�7 1: r\r '{ IN��yl�!';.. u}�l t�.��, ;., , y>aC.�'rx {y�y`•t"�\7}�"�,�.1 r{ '9.j" .�Y■ x ��.7"'atl �� ;1, d+i k,rl. {YYIra� r 7 ,mays+ �trJ [ �y �dl'( ?r1 �f"t��lr .►.:.. v;t ir•.td i fi��lv4'S.cr a�' 8� •, jjly d �•t�J �Q } +al:+ '?,. 11 1 [ t tyrF`t1 ,, r,l., + it L+ Sr){i. {�•�'i.�j� tp KV^1. �i+. ififi /. C •. � i, " r'�} ! ��. 1�•tt},.N f rt } t �'i � +f ij(��,+• 4'` r, }' r �. . i.{ t' Y y,r f � ff�Lr rr'�'� 4. fS°�;;,1'.y5 t���Xf��• �S )*� ;Nti. sty ��'^. �l1�fl��i��f?'v"�`' ,�. ,4�»S.,'3 .t'd�i�;^�"I+t,t��� ts:Y£'SYr)�t��:f r!' ����45'.�//a+1 f G rtk�f;: Y ,�Z1 i r ,t (i k, r{t i+ r a.r #•.0;11 },t. i. i ;d a`.k.+�'iyt' j+,.,•.r e t r�: ��'�3t2 1f1t1�' 3ii�.x• rr`+ �rh �t ,•� ;tt ;t �l,�t'iP;i .'ft.k :ti s•. �} � }rr. hytR f �i'�'�t �. ra• s! ,+ +r. "x:.• i K x. r C, ['y tii c4 t,� + [ tL of�d'.i�td ,t. '! �' '�'f>tM1 f kr� # i Z+;,,55(�iV`••'i +�'� i.'f F'�: t t L�g+w�A 1. }�'�' ��.C.;r E',�.����'•�`}��•.,`9�;i � 't}����.i i C�.:r � �`'k'1+f3• r {�ytx'°' :f�)i ia'i't {�,..c�S'ptr;'�"i�.('r 'S j" '^t1•i't:.. �S d. � trt`•,/ �t��.��'4'• f.�[�� »,�4 :.r'�-l`.[a`, �f� iiY�',it�4'1'•fjh�Y't''+ � ;rlt .tS .,.,a.•, C'}� �.'I....')4'�;l��f�f Y'k ��.:. 1.f,?i t.Lh Ar :} I..i�7n, 'i' r�y ,! `,t 1, J:��� .�t�,f, 1 31f" t'.y 3•': ?,rir`r'?�: Y�B�r;Y r :'t 1:1+.' Y:. .J,. ).,-y.�. :.1�� r�'/y�l• -��M�.s�. 4'r.,q tat,, r. S�''X•sf.Y,> r i.�� '?il�s"� ty�� {ate t•;,� t .y� h, 'J( t'•;>� 3 r{ } j [ s• '�;r ` $ r.{'j'�•. �,r, CFt1 �{t4' ''i+1k� 45�.`�','� t•�[t'41�t� +.f.��lr:�R�tiS ?' S�lk�'�yli � !! �•S�+S�'� at,Y+" ���}r..1.r?,""+�.; 1 ,�K�}�'-s�yS�jM: t^1 `ti�s.E,�y �C�'., �S:i.,:.�'�,r,�ft� .i :P t.r pit tr ,rr y �+r � t•tj ,r,i + e r i'..s ,�r;ss.r1 • sstt a i �t , 1��•.!i :Ki }' P % 'tw-f4a. }"1• aSllr 4 .}� , t�+ �j',�[ F {1, { } � �, # o` y 3r � +� N' `�y i l't�`�' ,�� ��F f'I.4 '1 . 1'}p c•�j T€f�++.E°•(�.'��1,;•t!E ,r,,y;lf.�tr,� j�y�:�t :.:�>�y� �����ri; .�51.'�'�t�Y��i�'4h: ��fi��S. {k1�a.`�'S b t;�r:�y��,��+�1'f..'n�}1.i HUHTIHo roll DEAC11, 13 , '� t j 3'PH 81 f November 23, 1931 [N'GTO, BEACH Fi'ANNING DEPT. Mayor Finley and the NOV 2 4 1981 City Council of the ' City of Huntington Beach Civic Cente P. p. Box 190 z� HunUVon Beach,CP 92648 Huntington -Reach, California Dear Mayor Finley and I•iembers of the City Council: Subsequent to our letter of October 16, 1981 , which contained our appeal of the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2 Tentative Tract Map T10853 Revised, we have had several discussions with Mr. Savoy Bellavia, Senior planner, Department of Development Services, and had a meeting with 3•S.r. Bellavia and a representative of the tiola Development Corporation regarding our appeal and our concerns with respect to the proposed development. As a result of these discussions, it is our understanding that. i•iola Development Corporation hasaagreed to amend their proposal in the following manner: 1 ) Revise the driveway access to Building 12 by tightening the turtling radius and realigning the driveway to %within appro>dmately 10 feet of the building. 3 2) Eliminate the parking spaces along this driveway so that there will be no Parking spaces along the driveway � which enters Building 12 and Building 13. 3) Provide a berm of at least six feet in height between � Building 12 and the single facaily homes to the east. 4) In addition to the normal landscaping, the developer Of the property ~trill provide ititansified landscaping between. Building 12 and the single family home to the east whose address is 17231 Greenleaf Lane and between Building 13 and the single family home to the east whose address is 17221 Greenleaf Lane. The landscape theme will be primarily of pines and other types of compatible evergreen trees. The Purpose of this intensified landscaping is to provide a visual buffer between these two buildings and the mentioned r° single family homes to the east. It has been agreed that these two areas to be intensely landscaped will include at least 20 to 24 specimen size trees in each of the two designated areas; of intense landscaping. It has further been agreed that this intense landscaping ivi11 take place at the same time that the landscaping for Phase: I of the development takes place. `The intent of having th:i.a intensified '�l'...:,�' a+•t�:�7Tt'.l.�j f•`�^{• `e r'"'S'!',f'. .,. ...•rr�. .R -mow,.-.r......'` r �..t-.+ ..mow..•. .. w r i'•w.', a5" t! i 4��, 7 t e, \.) dry, i ':;t x..•7•;•, it *h '1t Kat.. .ai W 1 71ereR EV ' ' r ?. 1 .1 'r. '` ! 1•�', F . is ,. r k .\ C` •• 4 j ) SL4�1 l S 4Fr!, yt t ,tY ' ! 7� r�tti�"�si �" ry ✓ 5 kfL. t'i' d'3i.,y(, ..tRh� cR) t' �� ���tt',7 [a.s 1 }• �.. ilex 'q�,e�. i�`4i�r +�, �. , ,.4�7: S{1..h� Il'l . U� �.• iL}+!.` t.�r". K 61 r.4.' ?;'.�A�� `�,h�{`t!'tr�4 ��i• t �t .}>��it. ..'l,�d. �5.(���y r 'Y .7 SiMt�, t f t1,.f 47,$t, � 4 �?,� / f`.}'7}.� 5 Jt�.� i�1• r�r �y,,t Yi � 'iil� ti�° ��•' } 1 ,.� '1• ,M t�',�r FS�t �.C4�� Tf o 7' r ,Lv���' kj� /• +� �a�; t•� �f w't i .,r=��t .I tul� �L � rf Yi ! t >• f� d g> a � ' , .f y ( •t,� f i ,T � 7 �: rt Y t�`.f�,. 7• Ri1V R� t�. y�ri �(��C�,'cy� Y iy r {{ y.Q}t•.l t7 jk/ 7 ��jf'..1 �' " Y+��yl,yl�,}' ,1 > i r.� �, u r •ri u ..,..i', +•: '.i.. }� t� 4;L.�1 1 "i{•1 1:F�i: r.i rfr ,.t t "4f i y ..y, t t k?fe i� ri�l f r{r{�•i, r�it G� MI. "A �.1• Y:. !;�.�.�1,�7�, � t�. \ J1w �,• v},�it�f,,�t.9'a?rX�a;lyt t � �a�•3�'-} !i'r.r � �,ju%�•ht } ;� a�,3Y,'1l F Y ��,, t wi"'4 C �1'vl���? �. (I+ ,�';t�.�? ''� :�-. 4 fi!tl•�. 4�L '4..+ �7 f° •Y �•L ,} ..[ '� �Jr �L"�:�r i '� ;a'x,�, d'. (��.�X<' ')j` Jr { �{,,(.�'t��.a t��\, `?f� .1j',,S 1 J;4 t.a.l7 .1Y �rLt° t f� j.� t+ "\. rr• ,�b�:y 14�, .4K.Y `�'A*', � .'{\'�...u��rn..`��. ! # t7. 'r� "f5,1r..t 11141 �:.Lt ..yy. ,���j 4 ��,�1,� {' 1�.7 `,c'y�f,,7,;t ,•��yi.,,,� �' '1.`•�.,, � �'. .�",l'�t ( • C.•% rt �(Rt7t�'•F � � r� r� 1:� 1� ^ �,t. �.� 1,�.�t .1,�y 1` t', �``4^ 4{: 4 ( l� r: � !'.' �� r ' 1l 'S '; ,u J .,y, {�a.}• � 1�,��h .� �1 ia�t\•Y d` �7.4.��`t t `ie f,4'', :r .� S t h ` ,n.�t':� ta��',� �u,'�`; `.C�1;.`t}. 7 -, ': i.� �,° r• `'1• 7; ��� f�i ��`S.•t!1 �r S 4� K�#. f,�.t�l t•'��litY1,�. � � �} � Z��a 1 �4r r + ly+�� ���� .,., '" r t �' +tt ttf" f \ e ,] � •�C".,Xt t"'S\r kS `. F �,-��r,4x ��\�` ��. 4.1�,''SLST 71 ,/c �'� �,,�„•yl,��„ z�• •"L�,S�:_--� r:�I.,, e ll' }. •r Elm to take place during Phase I of the project landzeap n�; s 12 and 13 are part of Phase III is J even though Bui_i din�; land to mini.laize the negatinQar�eascdirectly rebind f 17�31and 172z1 to alter the terrain o Greenleaf Lane. A plot plan and cross section of this area as agreed upon is attached. Based on the aforementioned agreeuents, tine hereby �rithdra�'t our appeal of October 16, 198 � since no out of pocket e%cpenses It is our understanding that, as a result of our appeals have to date been incurred by the City gill be reimbursed to the undersigned. our ;�150.00 filing fee Sincerely,, c ao W. GU es �. B a regar 1 'een +eauregar �114 G• (� Ca � 1 1 t ti w•��wywa.rwlry,i'J'aR�S'�htyM„"q.w•�•••�•' }:• 1' 't��l'. �`A i 1 : ,t' , a� ,�„'•�, t '�,i• � f��ttkr,�r• A�. ,ii y7" g,ky4 ►.r'rr��':'r� !t, ;tkE'k hts� •dC ,�'t�,r 1 �,,•r'�t ys,t C' �1 = }�, 11dX1, 3 ��'c�� �1 1�� :� � !r 1 i�a�'3i���• �'�r� ���•�, r •�,{ �� r Y�1 Y [ t� ' ry l �; �`�,l� � �l J�,y� `f S r��i}���,fit�^y 4�i:�;t P, r "l •�lti,�� ,+�''1•y,:yyc .fir � 't r ¢' t ,i � { Y �K , 'J ,y�Fi t r °J.';f ,t t ,.. r. !Y l• k 5% yr �Jf { 1• �1•t.t�, � ��l:`y��i'h �,r��n .}1i :,f s••f' '� .a FT 'j;.�xl +� °�r''1t�4 � �'� � 4h13v t ��r.+f';I�i��'.�" P� •+~- •r'7 :� � rti ?5� ,, .. `, fit .3� ,t( 4,}.v�•,� 3,1•R$fi, .,�•�, r1S1 };t+;�•s• „i �.. 'l -s ,•j ! s � :�r. s ' �� e14 ,.t nn)i };{t5 LP - •r •1 'y �§ F' "' r + t. ,y, :fit 4 K • s�, 4;' .tl,..t �. :, t?' �{i,.{ •1' r'1 ,i + i�'�7 , ty',, r icy El �ry� S. •s::y{.1 ? xj?T .+.,F t ad'a t. ', u(� m1w �� �+�{ �4� rI�1f'4j4t; . �ca� J,to, l � • .' i T f+� �;• .� .1.1 "�f r ' Y`�S'' .,\T }•Y, fy 1''; 1, 1�'+' j ?.ql tP'i. ': �'4 ` l 3. n 4•.if�! ����J .• (+, t t a} � �S .j., .r't•� � �"y.:',. 77 r y,1., t c,! iYq': t�iY ; I a F1't.' t� ��i• �,r 3 J9a .1 '.f�� •`ihh'tC::.t�;,�{ �tttZ-f :�`xr.�,,•t� n �,{ �a��tt t,3}1•'[(�'�"�ll'yyy '1 2� rl� ����r�ii��•.{'�k11A15��, ,'4y, r �lr '�",Yt +i ! � ,t,t ;r't.1�-' /'' ,11a:« Rt ct .:t ns9.fd1 ','t`••t.�s''r 'a.F �,{,{ T �;4 �*�Fill + 1, '�h�fy ��t.,ar "�. �t'�i t�•+t": r F ��4r, ,1�4 ,t.. �i.1,�' t[,� Iry �,.il eDl''�+fi<..• 4}��fl '3� ( , '• }. +k +rr:'t i�f��c '�' r.�� A�, •,',�,i'Z-i � ,.;c l+'t ,{'t;.,+ 1r �r "ti �A4 a .i. u d l,•:i, �it,..r` r t" � Lit 3 ¢ �J w w * °° x U z w cn Q Z r , t w 4 j� o c (D _ tG Co a d4.. > o •3 m v a vv I N • p) ' CD c• I: a li • �—. ..,...+.+,.......•.. .Pc.r•.�.<..•n•....ti. _....,,........ , .Fi..,:�,.. .. :i„ `;i:- ... ......—«....c'.•...e:::'G::�s,,.....:i~....�.��e:�t�.�ii'N�l�tir`iriir\k:n'�l�r'�+� I • � 1 t, a ti ( e�,,',4'l. " 4r �' 1. ..+•.y t4 A,i�.. 1 .�x �. sty'.�. '.;r I it+i' r�k '�L�l�l;'��]i)t�'}'i�ti�:���t+�ii�. t�y�Ti�� "�'�'•t�y,"•yi�f},� � ;�jw.i`•i•1, {:y4i' ' to , RON rk t et " y 1 t fry ,., 4it.� •, t f ,,.r a ,.a*, k3^ ,1,{"t 1���•}, 1t t .??; (. ,y� .;•��. 't,`ti:'A• •k�rY f++ ` }• ;�� .��i•,}, #4 1(� k �,,� f'r�,/ ,`� iL:.k .F .�F # , •t i �•_",'L1'�� r.Y; ��ti•.y,�,°t +a � xr:ytiti •� 'fiiiy �{(J } .riy Fi '{ ,T ' i'�'4 : Jr �' ,,, . 1 ` iy {t}. !V 6 # i S• 4 ," t.. tt r)t `' �. •� !Y � t c �. � .i. It 1'.1, t i .• � '� �r t �tF�. �} :4.. ���1,�#; t r.�y: :���' . ,.� !';',�,���. tz� 'fj�,�s.,�., !{ s�.{`.,i.C4•' �.�_�tT+„ t j fir', a�.:�4: " ,�" ,3 l}. pp ,L.�, ,,,. �x ��Q'. ,K. .��`t•t i .l ��.{r1 t�!=.5 1.a, ?s��t r > y "j. � �,t � v. +•.• �• �l h,�k.S�}�x"3�r'��Y�,�, 1'," '��. 1•;,.;, 1 rl?(" ,(.�:/ 'Cx*. "t t r Y}'. ''i ':, f }!;•y1 .~s,j t .�Z+E +S � +4 ! s;'L`�_�(:j{ "titcj". {"t�f,�...i�S "'`.i•}. ,[t•rt'•t"}5:�'t .,. �'�,a'�,1+Lt �1 '" �# t a , 'i ".o"v' 1 ?i {�, '{ , i{�` •� •} fz.}.' �rr.5:.6�a�:+�5 ti11�::,824o��1+i�1'itt>vuiirLrs:3i�tiCr'1.tWljliisrtuili a October 16, 1981 s Mayor Finley and the City Council of the City of Huntington PEach Civic Centero. Huntington Beach, California x x Dear Mayor Finley andkmbers of the City Council. � Ile vrish to appeal theipprovil .of. Conditional Use Permit No. 81-26/Tentative Traci;Mp #10M Revised. Subject property is located on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street and directly west of the R-1 single familyhomes situated on Greenleaf Lane. f We wish to make this ippeal to the City Council for the following reasons: 1 ) Misrepresentations and misstatements of facts made to the Planning Connissfon in order to obtain approval of this Conditional Use Permit; r= ,s 2) Negative economic impact of the project on adjacent properties; 3) . By use of lend fill to significantly alter the terrain on that section of the site directly next to the R-1 property to ` the east of the ifte, this project is incompatible with surrounding landuses; 4) The proJecthas been redesigned in such a way that a building has been placed within 55 feet of R-"1 housing and a driveway leadingto a ser,}i-subterranean parking garage has been placed withfo40 feet of existing R-1 housing adversely affecting living conditions. '• i' 46 a'iC.:v,{�;,c•;.ai'�'�r+.�, G�•1�..�j{'.:, ,.t•. —^ �:a:t+,,are`t uyt:.;. •.--•>,. .. .. y...�"�-•r• «+r+•++x.-+.•.. • '� '+' •;i:r~'t •/•... .r, .'•[ ..t`," .. .. ... "1~ .. . .',+.'i:'i',`;�w wi..V.. ..yi�.���%i�..:.�i�:i.yJ�—+'i.h rf,4"'•'4-.k!'sH+i�'y�'r�'r' 4,W' }!; i �l P,ti•�' "i a }''b' v ► `Q4iF +�� t' { '��F�1",{�+ ^! 'l •�yi,r 4..,Jt�Y t'►y��`�;4.;..�ts lt»' w:F��'r. 'J�z �' rs,x�' 'lr'1�' "q ryi ,}T t"t _r}«1.�y. t ..,,o."•' lrY•J r �tv/ /r ,". ,i � '•!' `v.ly+t Y t,' s4- l. �qli'� 1.tti[ 1 4• ��'�Y r�r�', ' ? r • , 1 ' '�' J;i 'i r t,i� ( fit' s, .Sti 1.,� 7-�r f J�h�'�v Jh �?i"' L"Y': f' j, 1', •r'4. S •t;t ;d' 4 � r £ rH 1{ iC} ��' �' �wr ,� K-`!»f ���.• E t!r S' � '�i.�iX� � .iif`i''�'"�.j,`,�i!'d'r�.1,�1e,�.i�,.�����,� ��'�i���ri�� sl4�i l Wt ! ,;4 `` � 1;}��ff,l t �'•� i; 1����1f t. ip(h ;A• G�hf� �J 4' � +1` .tn?;.f. S}�a �`�J}-iCt { sti q t.�!,t� :t, i�` r S ;i `ltl •.1� " ` 1 d.�y. :t, fyy4"��f"t•�'.0 � M�•1A�aa�yr+a�i l �t��l a, {�t� /.tr*� i ,�<'�'j •,}��,�,kt�'1. }a a i 1 .J� 1F r„ tl ;s }'., �y {• !�} E 1.4at�uM'�}�.1 y ``rt�t( ": , }, ;A�CY�. t ';i lL �} 'SA:I`�� `'•i 5 .qr .r7., ',its '4tt?•t 'C,t�SrX Fi?• *, !.}�' �t).r'J.-•ti` '1�. Jt a3' lt:Jc '�• r lr 35.E{� F'I���f..t.. ,� �� �':2'�. ;1�4 VS G�:t Y t��,'}�S,'�W� t. ..3"iw� Yr'!� r i� �z4 •(j4,���' i.. ti�;tff,:+RT,t.�t p 1�iy ,r •,t�`�`1.,�, ��i r�'��,: �;?l.(�f r.�,�'. �1 ! ��`.,. } ,�,�, jM�� kr tt � �+"•�'�AX''I �!i?1•'� : firi �t� i+Ar S. e � ?•1 '�`�'A 4�, t�i�:f.�i =(•.}1 'f;� N'•� 14, .'4z 1.:.R•i',��� !'` `J .�4'r'...f ��.}t��„� �i_.-lY 3• ti...,l,f.y .. .�`•�r� �+ '''i: . .'r �,k :(ti''v�. :•.:�, �yr,'.� t,1 , }�1 1`p 1� ��t�, ` j 13'�: d�.� t. i:• w,Y(yk 1 �t5 ,�:�,ti f id i f•34,r � �74�f�ti.y. r ¢.t{�/{. ? ISAilYS ... . ttttiy �,�t � '!'� 'r 4• r :si� ,.�£. �,;�.{!� t t, F�.,\!. ji�, F! `�•i��fs,.t t { I ,,•'.. j �`�::, l _ 'G'C�, t i tl, ti.)4« '' V t�SiYt, , �. aR �. t<� i •+ ,} i :+t; rM +# 1<.i }'iF S �i.•1 '� 1 z " �. t ! '(� S't.t•� j��1:1 n .+ t. 7 F ,J.1 c irk f�; G! t v r i °A3 h•. Ji k'))'� y1• )) `,tY l :ti,`�f: t�'i '�'�a Y'•'t3G�{ �t;+V{�, .'k:�Ftr!{.Yy�`"�. ��,tl ' 1 '�F�>'r. ..s ! ''� k1�`}� :X i + { `+:1y'. H✓,tr 1 `�" �t �• r�4;.�'' i-• }°:r �' �: :'Y'iy• t < r 5.Y t�i.>dip ':J+�„X'.+1.. : ) `� ,;i'i t•+Y '�i'?� �7•tii �� r ..,.�'t.. .Trl, r}�ii�i• �, � Y.R1fAIS(.!; ,{r. �, f, r�friic��a� w ." r i 1��r�fi,�',;)i�t '�,)� �� I> �" '" +� 'r � toA �1 �i�t���d`.;'� . ,�4t 1'.t U��' +"1" t:�i;�.i l•.ti `tt. '(J' S' t,•� <, •��, r y } �.a.J;; x�'45`.ti5 u t '� �.i , .t.i.if.S; v 1` r i 1+•x //� 4 �d"]yy !:-, �'/ �,��.!•'� +�l�git'a iSr ,p •�), r a; ��c.t'f} rC>'v }t t`t,i... k s,( I Y{ � �, '• ',a»J i"..a(rr !4`1 � !<''t7 it \t'_'� l: .�' i .:'> .i)L}'',,,�..�'�`'t� ,}�y( ��' b�1 h 1 L � � f��'' #TLa4�.t1 � �y�lj }#�' �i, t � 7. tl•� ) a� h� 1 � � t•�•!.'L�:rie 'F Y,—(,C:Sd .�C3„ •.rtf" � .A'•y .I,yri 7..'` .i1Y`�T • ' ``'�j He seek to discuss these issues with you in an open hearing and believe that you will agree with us that the revised plan has serious deficiencies which are unacceptable to the affected residents. Sincerely, f auest iar es ea r:'gaMd� ff / Ana ues ro een Beauregar �11 . 1. l ' C • .I -2- .1 i. L-.'��.:�"•�:rRsit;.k:aS:i;:t;:G:�t.`4.y,�',v ,.isi'e`.vy�•...........T�+ct.:':.i:".1;—,.,. _ � - ;.,�c.':iw:•.;:.:.r.�.—• ._, �•f �r ,-. • 'Ih�:'P.}� .. . .,�r •l.. 1�. .�1v�4.','.����,J«:,.M..r�•q.,�.rn•��i'�.fti`r�`•'/.� ��.. 1 , N.V I I Fill JT v v vi, .VO, m V,Mg, i 'Sl "rt V*P I W11^11,li IX !i, 0 PA, RECEIVED' CITY CLE114- UTY of ifuliTIFIGTON DEACH',CA41F.' DECK 417 80 Ilk ` I I I �. Cif-:a• '.Ra• n,�N;'s .w. ..,q,, a t.�r. ..r,..,. :•. .r_.,. .t. .t, . ... •. •r•, ,. ...�! _, ........ .,....•. .�<•.Y�'.%'.`r::,�;- . .AS�'ae..r-=-`-i.>....t.,......•..s,..Y..s.."t- tr.�a�,j__.._.._......�............. .... _._.._..._.__...... ...._ .. .... .... l:L••:^.:... ... ..... �._ ....:r�; ` 4 t !� •Tc..j yr '��. 14 V 1 1 r E,."' �.�-�+��•v � Tr r , ,,,y, ' ii t,. <t j, i. .;at 1>, iC.r?�'%1;`, t, t, tL`` , �'.'l e, ,1. ;1 �. 4 4.,, ;,,.a It X U,..• twl:�`, ,41i4r�rl,�1�1 rr�11,rY1`n'S t; .:t'�� j �,rt ,'lr Yi -�4.,� ••,r. F• t'a^ii S• �?a ,.'..fir•. n�,a t; � ti,i• t n/I 4"sY� n•.; 'i":•{`,, + ;t•..;; �.r"'+..;, c. 4'. 1:" � t}t.} ir',r r SA1;Et`.' .ra tt';,t _ 1.�ar+._,1•. ;.'f f.), `,"..�� ?rj.a�C;rr..Rf� 1. �:1 S `��'>�. 't+�rt'] • '�'r•',7t.1 r e.lE7" S•,�i y :.� •�`•y,��,?tilt �t:r.,R,4t M',#"1 ttt hS1f++r,`s�1 2 �•�R.y.. ,)L,111: al )'i st r't'.<� � :r./ i �r'1; a,�f { s t;f,t+}• �?c•li•.'� w Ott)� i•?19�t• c;•a;� i t��, !r''��•�'.�t •': fy 7 a�1 �'�� 'tzlr ;t i V �, • � �1,'nl i i �• '! r ,z'c � t+• :1. � i �, .r t , !� .! C. la i .4 � }4�;c rl\ ,� ���•�/i .y {( �+ t�. .1. {{'!l 4 j t .:f { art '� t r,f.1, �• tiy1�•!i E 'i..y�. i � •.?t,� �. q. ,,I.�,1!�L$." Eh ,1°.s�;4E �(z, •.,t�,h t �;4f: ..i..,r:`a iF�c •5. ,i-�1::`"i�Y�����'' �w rttj�..�it �•'f���:�¢f�f.}t,:x ."7;•�+w ����'_:r t � t7i�1�` �, t `'+f•,+':''ya t��•� (� ,.++1,{�.,{,��t.;a.+4�'\c'i},ii`,),i"�1� .•�•4 •.�z�";'"���. 'h'+i�" �', 'J`'.f k�t7;`t�.,;;��t•Ml` �`.�,j+,.�1,7r 1 ,�,. .:rltL YJ t_ �i+��x' }' Tel;`}��'�,. A�{ljf tl�, ill`j• i i °tr•., �,' � r,as ,r'', 1•. S') b. t `i 4., r•'a,,. .� :'�,,i• a t t �'�• } t .'F� +� �.! k ry �,;x �g' 7%i•�d 'It t ��. t '� � T� �a1,yj er1 tit li 7 r y'}x t ttr, ,rt y.3fq, ��,,''t'�,•tr", �{s}�i��'.`a►5a1�1' ,,,,1`��� Ctc�} { � ih7., „1,�)` ���L`E .•� �•, h .�t� i i����.�t.� Y}rz� } � j{ •ie t^ Y`' { ! ►�. 1 a 4 1, ,�" r ,�1r77„ f"' i tt.:: t7S Yrd f �p��y ao' }Y, yy',� f11t11r } i• :7y�t w• i;,{;. µ t �IJM1J't {:'iP" tz t p'y �!1 f+ �. �yt,�'{5FJ}' �' �h.� J.•f;�t ira ,1^•.S' �,. \•� rF .f't tlt,7•f .t• Rti',R GtJl1i!)� !0.1 'r 1iS.aiYft.t �(:{{� r ?;Z,itj,�9YS'.:: °'ie,i� ''tt•�l" • ! � �} �iTS,ti11i•t4.f4' y`'j.,a.F.• v{�1,�'f'•'I,,tir �.�''4.1��'•it "�ike;(t.;"V.ti is t'}�"l ,��.?{id:4�• .•�.•�'�'. ;t4 �+�1�.•i'w�.� [� t.'l'',Y7"k`.r. �'' +-• 1`,t.:J�E .�Ryt�.� •+/'R.�., �E,e.{9'. S'S7, ,{�.s{� F f'f l,tti.i�'t�Y.l6 �': >, c$�`�� � i..,", t � � 3 i+.. 'fit• �,�+� f.1r5 a! f -1 t�'�-F"� •'liY;�y,4c, .i r 1 f:.i f:4 � } ..f �� w �` f E{j•••� �'. .�S'L ,l n-'�E'l+^1 �.Y �' ` �` 11 f{�� � 1��=.1,���z'•i?r�}`�i,1t, :S t''� A 1'•} ,1.. "`Y. ,� •:.+4��r�: !��i'Kk4Yih"t:I� �'4.a�, t T��, 3t t r�l �. r t r+`�. ,4: �,",;r ('� ;}1 t• R i # , � ! �r � � �, +�>; 1�{ ys, �..��� {' 1• rr�r,t't h,�•'�+ 1{ � E ai 1,tt n �4.'t. �, p ,�, , 1 i S � t, ,, � ,t j 11it1.4.'•. f 1 4 i '�', E w;}' q }'�l•y4 ✓r,•�, iF�'ata' �1 �, �S'� ��! y'�'ac•yi ,�, •ti: ;;�`�.��;�,t�1,:s 7,a ��'�:,�:��,,.���� �'•u1, �°�"'���,� � .rt�r� ��� ,i;+ ."f,l!a'r:R• ����•P-iii �3 '��' •"�• � 1 �T, , >� '!i ,r 't 'E /" �°1 ^+i'�� �d}:'. �:� x, �,,, ,t:, y 4.?, 'i• � ! 1. 3 �•• �, '� ,,., hG�1(','.. �!" � t 't Y ar>. >••f : �• �''; y'1.ti{`h�1 4 ,4+ +� s. �� f � i. 7 t' 's � �' �. � *� '4 's�: t:•�';�• '"t�x.� �"'t.r ' •j }'�,L"��r�; rt+,�K'r,�,�tt,•t'�t' i�A� a .5� S t,1., �j.Y�.+���5�tr,{<� ,p� h,�(�M1a�,(��,j..�,}l�f.�.,�i'Y'a�i �'ti:d��,;i j, g7�?���fr.f t,i' � ^7^i�1. ,v,•q�r" ��rz't1� � �, tli�?, t f 5'Y':�f?�a�1�'Lfi���?a•�,1►rtSy:��,� ,;,�+sf,�'�,y..�;� `s1f.i��ttr�;�,.}•�:9'!:•�!`1�C�.�)'�: �d�Lfitn�f''1ri[r'.5�f�rtr`a�!'i�Er.'w/�.i�...���.k�t�ki:l,".`�,4�.r.�f14��4'►i•�i:��t'��E;tr�a��C�ii.^�,"•��r��.��f;�.rt0��.��, -� ti '`'�''.1.�jk5 •5 1?K Y r ti �•INn-,.rr 4� s•.�, n, ...< .a.fr.. .?x� :. •...Ri-:,.,r.l'ir.......L.��:r.�..wY.:::..i i..�..._.,. ...}'C-Y..`:'C.'C.�.1 J....r.... _. __.:.a.... ........._:- .I:i:nr•u••._...nny.+ _,-•".,....-.1...... ....... ..t r.a4.�.i...:lire.i' LL �j ' a aa . t w Vil it 3:,R' ,..••,•.rq.,,, 'r;,�. ..'r. - ,.,-,r .r,K...,��,�, ,:., r "^'.'snt!"`R n "'Ti�'-`'r� +.T.T.�.i. ,.� ;. i �ct ,'} ��"'y'>TS •,�'�" w, t :z,. �4l;t1t�•''� ,lr t. t s,'. 3- J 1 i iy- rt" ..i'1 �^,r.y s.i•: l � th^ +.xii..Y t •d.^. ,; r t e. r q L((f ., r tS• !.1 f.'.\•' �+,.. 1'•1,;1 i •.'S,'•'. I 1 Y,Ii�,�V'�I y'a NfY f. , t•` t,a ,. :#1(a, e lJy T,si L. � .r� � •f '�1��d tl• �) j} 'tStj i<t :�o �i �•YI lrk. I�,r� .5 .{ 1 t S „y` ,s t,:rJ�'. ��r yt;d. t t"1+�. 4t;t f`, Gx' l"�', s. 1 }f" k.[ +. 1,. t i, -1i S4;�1 F t;:J':� [ t } I ��St•(i .tr5`t�,.x�j�-�'^ ��IP `Y�1.t S11,•1 l A•�::p;,R.�„'Irt}✓.tY t%lE,�y "tr 3'`}•} �t?t,..F ;8"�'~ �+e'.'i- �4` t p 7Vt,i !'` •t,l�'{�•,J{1� � +S� � (l�l .1 `� ,,.a `�1V1 •.� �R.}�1.: �d � •,,y.l� �', i. t":i'U Ua4;t`J,+n,J.. }�� .Srx 1` 'A tiyJ1 :tj. fir ,�15. ,^��,ar4�>Ft�• 4 s•i ti. •s .,yl :; ` .Z.I,r't,+.u.y'h-3 rh r,t: ,jam t SLT ' •�(, ,•F.,..•Si�y Yt.t.r'pa4�lJ. ,f 3,y,+{� r r•,tnfF: Y. t,/. c�..i. « ¢fw ? G ?,• (5!.I) '�;I? J:rf 11. `, 4 \t;�4'tt �, t s 7 R }ti. , ^'� '�..Ir.."4' � if.,.�. "r)..kV .+J'r15, "llgr 'i�•(11$A.e'� /� ,.,'{ t; S ��445'+c r 5�'r�Sa,,li•„YZ+E. r�ft��fiy� {�r��{ {{ S tiis'til y,t�trt°;51i."'.+{:rt,tttfty4,+.71{ '1,1.' ,;f• ,tla�i�.l r,) 3 i���t{�1�117'4;'fq'h �t�tti?; �.'��;fi;• �I,::iet�7-.,:;�i`�;'G,.,;irr���'��k ;l'.1�]J�'� �:� �' 'lf.�.���w�c�P tt #, v�r• elt. xt•ir�} 'ltir,la't��7' �.��.v�1'���•.1.'J i� ':Jl :�� Y"'�3�t •�s.trle� r.�e.Y„`{r�. g, t:'1[J"�q�.,'�n.`�1�.�.+��er�axf'^Yr4�,C t":,e�b''���i.Y�}�Sj�j tt�r;�y t#!��''E�;l:'.��..s>�}�lti�ryr,�±,3��•!+x'a"S..�.?,,'i�iifPy 1�r•4.i.</�ft{��3kA�y1/l 6�li�Y.r),.i.��!.':„lI�":.i\.4.;,t.if�'1�'i.�1c.�..�"''ikF�an 1i,��,d`�,',4r'yr kY',ti��3?1f t.JC o�,.Ea4„%Lal'+�i�i'Jf`1+j•�C�}Y����'f.�'J,�!;r2��i1}.;`J`r�'7 I5`�f`r>�S`!',�ti1�{+�f��'�i'' ``'���r:'4 e'`t,•}a11:��.,{•r�T�rl,,i},��P5't t#��lyt`,��'�LA�d�Y�.�F?ty•��JJ1'r/���},-�1 1a�,{J.;;r•t I,'7(1:{V.y, Mill, # 71, �..f^1l`.P�•+s,,�.",r1¢y�J.',•kt':�.,.l�,m,fr,1.x�1.'`�"�'1.'r�,r(e•,,:i pt[[�{'f`'1�1JJ{t��-�,l'���.+��'•y�i(1Y 1!''+S�r.y'�,.�t t�`-{��'aY(Y`,'�iA,s'I,yJLF}(�.�.,,x.N(1�f 1�1.�i t�'•{+k"{ra•��Tyly'1•��.�((.^^'14((`f,���.{,tt'Mr i 1tY\"��:���.{1'.�`'�fid••;`4�}.�ia;s.�k.t.>t�yF l+�.h1��i t.?w;l.rI;ni,��e��t�l�"�,�.�,ar•�'.\#�'�*1 trtl 7':1•S�ti )1!� �� � '�+� R' � �� r7 '�•1��Il' , ,�}�N{ �������kT3 �+ y '�'`Ij,�;3� 5, ''�,r:!ey 't,�' 1'4'�.� �� w t',• •�{�)}'�"t �� 1. f 1��'�.,�'f,,;r t � �y •�f� �' J x� 5 ^ 7 1 d��• �+,.ltw:..�...1:i.atr.'L•..'w...}t}„r.«I�7riw•..�c:.•t1.L�i�i,�- 5�: rr. .{^.' .e.`a-• 1.. - " 7. t.i .}.il •( r.t rr..�, .�ll��ti.w" • ,,........ .. . ... .a.'�t..� .t..._..r....,..,«.....1.t�:a...r«...L:i.L,.r i t i Ilk Hs , ♦ l At t\ S 1•tr..,= ...rtn^r^V�+•t,.!^r*yr'w �!lt"'l� r ldr..+. �+_�X'M` .'k .i ,t;' tr. I41' rr1.�: �!1�'"SS,nwrj+tirrr?.r �.r`•..`',�:r���}•r�, �t.a�., 'l:i �f.'fn 1td .`t11' TX '' a._X �{•' 1'tS�tif RY a� Z" .{ ..1-iJ : , ,'� � '• `1 �''ia?, tie` lr,1 i ,a,a "t' �2 t(..r }*� � ��, `s 7'J :7{,r i• 'LL��� � t J $;u.t,t i .t t. '�^ t1c �•3 t t #' � t" XI•% Ll'i � p,'�,�'• r �•. 17 } 5' +(` �'T ��1 � i"1�;;�''�t.'��.:; .� Slt ,. �{ ; t ; ','t,,,t C��,rj R�r f k` :'.'t t. Y; �rr ,k+, ,,":•d . �• � '°x`\'.�',\ :`• kt '�.� tit!,Y4 J s. t 4 .1 '�; • Fr ,'�,r4 a�',':�* '1t'�t3� 'b, t i•t`,,�i�5 �'r ;�'k.� l fd "�.•,c t�` •�.�'4 t•i.. �' ��!' 1 tr.t.;`41,•t s !1, �,fs !•� � �:�,,.�.'' fF:�}:!i.;. ��.s'7 qt�4 4]�, , yj } .ti 1 .r ry a � 1 Y r ,}x t, � \1 4 .t 5 :�:"'• +� ,.t c.i+a�;', I q its ) f(. +1 } /, .+{ 4q.d •i.. S Y �. 4 ,�1 �l �1 k,X1�4. 9A te..P,'y, 1� f4 'i ;ktc t „!•It4',l<r.,��''i , rFr d�,y`!! jt r ,ti,f -�:¢;4;�! �#*'�r.�l,y9,^+' .1 4 + 7'�, �4d'�ri, �1?•�.X(�. r y �,..k'�, / f !' �!, 1ii.� :•k , s: ,Zl�..t'�� x.,. ,Y 7 �. ) x a S�•� .r . ► } �,� s �r4., �., �, ,aft `�•<i'.'�,r�- �i 'y .Y a;k• t l� t�- (yx4,!3 41d e. 4r+� 1ti, a f1 r 1111 f�it'i4 •.r Y��. 4+} }:i• j f r '7! r�"r rr �y,ti e�.. ..i�,� .. 'r� i� 1 f#�11. 1'Y. _LS/ ''1 fr J�r t J re t.. +r=r•3t F. } lrA3 #;P}d>«1E },fftrf t i1 j ..Y V l ` , 1u1: lS{ �� t lrrj 't bt J( { .t'� te+ �.1�.I��,+Z"7Y. •fi' 'y+�i .�tg.1! 7.t1 J.t.} �.y;.,1yy, �3�p ,tt'�"� t?7 4 A�r� r..i�{��,1 1 Y ,� �.�i 4t 1, V�,�l.�/y .;t4'��tVa�'1•!� l; :7• � :f��••.4 ,i.SxTS Y� xP�A,•:" f�' # tl i+'•�` A 7 r ! {!t lt� " ::•�J��� ;...i ,. y�L.� �•'►li:'"r `tk .;Y•. ,'t.r47w� `�iVt r•,,icr;,� i�{:�'�`� .r: ,( lt 7J tE7i�fy '}�, �, {,c f, �y } F } ( 1 4 ��, } Y7t �. y� t ;� ! �'•' tir a 7,� i' `'r' ��'��c�°'"':S •� i`t �7 ,;rt�y.4� � i t,��i; ;. Rt � ;{,t ,t. � { t �+ f. 7t ir.,• r r 4i� A^ r a 1 s. �, � •.j'� i•h.,� f �1 t .hY t, 1P'1���:Ytr1 �Yy i R'1� <,7.!3;./..7!' �t? �. .�ttQ� •� "4 ra St•"� k+.t :�.' 1 '♦. ,�t t�g .�r,;N kl�"'�'` L�•` tY•:},59 R t.t1 r a f �� '1J 1 s { v p •,Y.iR�4} a { ��•� r[ 7' `.. '• t` 'did-' ti a } 1' ��t� .'4a:} r # � {:�,y, iS r fwn �,�(` �� ��+� � ,�t��)�. { .�'fs 4 tt��: �! S•�r�•�j",.4f"S��t�i1J���..?jro; f ti r�'•��'� 1,'�,tt�tt r�C�S rr jr tat �1�t`•�"�{ rR13 .�,�� �a{i:.3.� �K�j �1 ..t�} •kTi,'tt.'# a �,l�r .�4�1•�i}i.�{.,�� ;1'}, r �3 iY.}.,.,tlt� :+lip;: i�it�'t{= �Yi �'��.Ir , .a •sr�. a,'.'� . 1`rtyc �� 4 . �� a {.� Y.;4 rt{:� t "•�;,,Y�tc' '�,-t+� t�:µ. 1!•k, %a ,a, ^� �'4;, t.,.c1r� ,;�" f't'; f v:).," It"1 ky y�1.t1E. S ,. d"d�47L '�:;: ��1 ti�a� i4t 5�' i1• �x• '��•t�ii�t� 1}in � ' e f, �fc. I 'a�ti�����s� �`'•��'�'� i�'d'rJ�� ��ai��y4�� ��y�' ,,;,,7,ry. .,�.��t`y .�1�'�• �"�lht.'���' �a,+ ,t� �1t�y'1 r�:}�j`'jyyi! �•,� � "�� ,� Y� � i �;�• � ��, ,�. t%. ', �..,',�,,. i�'. a• s :111.�.a'��,?�� qj,! `, gyp` Y a�'�^ '� ti ����'F. ... .`�7����� � : .. 'n7 �7:�L��►� �L1� ���A'F��t' �.5� ���f•� e�:+��iit�a��'7y3,MP ei M y .......... Ks zz� t� V� 1-4 i � _ • r1 1. `��"I. r c z •�.,` `� ^ \ AAA Y HE: THE BOUCHER TOXIC WASTE DUMP JANUARY 19, 1981 WE THE UNDERSIGNED FETITIOF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUNTING,ON BEACH TO DELAY THIS MEETING TO A LATER DATE. WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF THE PROXIMITY OF THE TOXIC WASTE D%lP NOR THE DANGERS INVOLVED IN REMOVING THESE WASTES. WE WOULD LIKE TIME TO EXAMINE ALL RELEVAlrj. MATERIAL INVOLVED IN THIS ISSUE Wfi_TCH IS OF VITAL INTEREST TO US AND THE CO?MlITY. ,ram-`�--•-- a.Q-- ,c,`�.`t' ' �'12.C��- 1 r 9 _ nr.0019 " Sip of y .21✓ si J —7 knot) 0 � r � ... I A q. w� J 01 ,ram it ,- •[�`; • ��P i !. . --cy "(4z. Cc, r r c �S . a - ro'*, . r CITY OF I-FWATINGTO N! BEAJiC" V INTER DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION iuwt�rdrw�r+ru To Jstmest lei. 1131in , Dtrectrr• From City Attorney Development Sevv is e, Subject Off--Site soils 'rrs:,t trtC Date October 7 . 1980 a.. a Condition of Approval and Halting Uevelopnetit 1•E3,1011AIII)UM 01701011 STATE"M1:11T OF FACTS: 14o1.a Development Corporatton han tentative tract and conditional use peirmit; appiicattonr• pendirtt; silth the city for, development of a 224-- unit; cowtominJum project; on a 12--:acre site located oil the east side »f Bol.ia Chicrt Strect nout•h or Warner Avenue. The Planning Commission han directe:i tha:. an FTI1 he prepared far the project. For many years a port• loft of the site ha.r, hr(,n unrrl for the disposal of ha virdous chemicals which are suspecto:d' to be migrating onto adjacent property. r t7t�rsTI0r. 1 : I)nrr, the, cLt;y have: the lit„n]. --wI;hority► to rnrlttire site applicant to per— form soLls L-enting on property which abuts the subject site? ANSWER 1 : No. , The alittttLnt; property ocher would have to give pet•mission and the applicant would have to consent and arrange for the testing. i QUI•:S'i'iUtJ 2: Pon.,; tho City have (Aw l.nljai :r+tt,hot-I.t.y to caiine r_r,isft:tng , uncompleted rievr.lopment crrt propertJon .•rhirtt: tng t.hn subject; property to censr, con-- ; ,truct ton pe►edin6 a rleter inherit t.on ns to whether chemicals origi,nuting from the 11oln site .are mlgrat.ing onto the abutting properties? � AHSWER 2: Yis^. The c: lt.,y ors i;lrr. Cot,urt.y 1)r.pai-Lment would have to obtain a r.rrurt; ordeveil in,jrrr►r.t tern nit:'t;trig count;t•uct Lon. Cal. Lfornia Civil Code 573 L. 1 , 1r11• r t r r�1 . r� U P. 0. U.,3x 11d flan:in ta: " ::St,CA 926.9r :Y ;•�'.yi' ,. , .� s.. .. ...•.;:•' ..... i .4 Ilenor:rr:ol�un Op ini nn iin Ofl'-..i I.r: "M I Lr: Orttober 7 , 1980 Cnn►1 t.is!nor of Approval. and I'age 2 Hal tIng Dcveloprnent ANALYSIS 1: There Ire certain np► cifle provisions which allow cities to impose off-site con►lit;inna to tentative maps. The city can, by ordinance , contt•ol proper grading and erosion control including the prevention of rr_dlmpntatloll or damage' try off--site property. Subdivision ilap Act , §66411 of the California Government Code. Local ordinances can also .`eelltire reasonable off--alto improvementn for a subdivision of less then rive lots. Subdivision Flap Act , §661111.1 of the California Govern- rnent Code. The torn "pro feat" refers to the activity which In be LnS approved. Orf-•site testing is noft Dart or the project. CSQA Guidelines, §15037 of the Californir Administrative Code , Title 14. Thern i-et no npocif le provision of the .Subdivision Map Act or other law providing for drilling bore samples for soil testing on off-site property which abuts the r;rrb,Ject site, and although i'; is a question . or fact , it: (Ines not apiv.,ar that such a Nequirement w.iuld be a reason- able condition to approval of a. map. Any condition imposed irporu a tentative tract map or parcel map .a vali�l and lrgal an long an the condition is reasonable and rationally relayed to they project and riot In violation or the Subdivision idap Act or local ordinances. ,'tyres v. Cxty of Los AnGeles, .Supreme Court 1949 , 207 Pac. Rptr 2d I. C.ent•ly thei,e in no way to require the applirant to perform soils tent- ing •oil off-si.te adjacent , non-owned property; however , it' the adjacent property owner would permit this intrusion and rll.nw thin trespass , then U. would bo perminaLble if the applicant consented to do such t:restlnl;. tdol.a should pay for such soils testing , but cannot be required to 'do so. ANALYSIS 2: A checntral analysis as well. ar, tests for physical properties of the nol.l on thy' nub,irct; property nhcyOd be submitted to the city for review ,I riot• 6n lninia ne of* buildint), pr.r►nits. Thu ► .1: wall o or bul Let i ru;; voil mils Wilitiol; be rarcrned heeatine or ponelhle, clnon.0c.11 :unrl win r:rir;ral; lolln. The pt•ope�r proc:erinrp to prevent construe-- tl.nrr or? hropr.rty 1'ar wlrl,eh huilrttrig t�et•ml.t•-n luivn alveady been isnued , hrenaiinit or pnontlilrz (;ar-Pr; or, cherilcals inigrating , is to obtain a r.ourt ordni'a►l Inju►tr•t;lop tcenlporaril.y halting construction. California Civil ctrir_ 5*131. ; 60 AI,113d 605. "It shall be prenimierl fruit 1:1ie Iusuanre of a building porrrit 18 a I I 1 �,�,.,i .1::]9• M•..Aq. •• :L,. ....-Nish.•+••••.••-••••�1'1's':�.::I:.ldc• ..•s:«ICJ 1.r..tr3l r.CsnM�;vr{vM•�'intlMrrsr,.. -- Memnrzndiwi Opin.ton Re Off--Site .Snits October 7 , 198U Tent.tr;; an a Cnnditton of Approval and Page Halting Development Ministerial act. " M.tnJatr,rtal projects are: e;xcmpt from the require— ments of C1.QA, and no environmental documents are required. CF.QA Guidelines, §15073(b) of the, California Administrative Code, Title 14. Thus, the issuance of a building permit is a ministerial act. 111Wnere the 11w rfsquires a governmental agency to act on a project in a set way without allowing the agency to use irs own judgment ,, the peojent 3s caller] 'ministerial' and CEQA does not apply. " CF,QA Guidelines, y515032 anti 15073 of the California Administrative Code , Title 14. Where_ all the conditions and requirements have been met and nothing remains but the mere isruartre of the building permit ," then it is a minis:crlal .act (mandatory act) , and there is no irnmuni"y for refusal to issue building permits. Hirsch v. People by DMV. (1974) 112 CA3d 252, 115 Cal.Rptr. 452. CONCLUSION: 1. An applicant, cannot, be required to perform soils 'tests off—site as 1 a condition to approval of* his map or C.U.P. 2. rhe issuance -jV a buildi.no permit; is a ministerial act, (mandatory act) and cannot peruse trrjuance of building; pennit because of possible gas or chemical migration into adjacent property. The. proper procedure would be, to obtain a court ordered injunction to temporarily halt the construction. I ' City Attorney 1 Gil:M1• be .danwr CITY OF td1.jNTINGTON BEACH 1 `2 1NTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION inwlmOTEW n.nH To Gail Murton From James W. Palin, Director City Attorney Development Services Subject LEGISLATION REGARDING HAZARDOUS Gate November 14, 1980 WASTE DISPOSAL SITES %ttached for your review is; a copy of Assembly Bill No. 2370, which has been passed by the State Legislature and signed into law by the governor.' The bill, which becomes effective January 1, 1981, amends Chapter 6.5 of Division 20 of the health and Safety Code. The general purpose of the bill is to define hazardous waste property and to pro- vide the State Department of Health Services authority to restrict use of land which has hazardous waste or extremely hazardous waste deposited on it. The bill could affect property surrounding a known, abandoned chemical-waste dump located south of Warner Avenue and east of Dolsa Chica Street in Huntington Beach. The Mole Development Corporation presently has applications pending before' the City for deve3-opment of a 224--unit condominium project on the site. r A summary of the major components of Assembly Bill No. 2370 is as follows: 1. The bill defines hazardous waste proi.ierty and border zone property. 2. The bill makes the owner of hazardous waste property and border zone property subject to civil penalties if he or she puts the land to new use, subdivides it, or builds specified structures on it without 'obtaining a variance; from the State Department of Health Services. I :i. The bill provides a procedure for designation of hazardous waste prcperties after public notice and public hearings take place. 4 . The bill rea,tjires the State Department of health Services to give specified notice of the designation of property as hazardous waste property or Lo der zone property to the owner of the property, to the Legislative body of the affected city or county, and other specified persons. 5. The bill requires that any owner, lessor. , or lessee who knows or has probable cause to believe that a significant disposal of hazardous waste has occurred on the land which he owns or lease; i ;ir (hat the land is within 2,000 feet of a significant disposal of � hazardous waste_ shell apply to the State Department of health Services for a determination as to whether the land should be desig- nated a hazardous waste- property or a border zone property prior to construction of specified structures on the property. 6. The bill provides that a city �r 1 �c count-1, which has probable cause P Y , p to believe that any land within its jurisdiction is a hazardous waste property or border zone property may apply to the State Depart- ment of Health Services for a determination whether the 'Land .31 . I should be officially drsignated as such. .. 1 ""J'113,'`F,, ..�spy. ��µ ,1- , •.1'i.r•i. .,,....r .: .... s 1:.rn, . .._. . . _ ... ,..... ...e+-.... .0.D... ....-...w..,...._,a...w«.ww++w....+s.-.'.;m .�xw.. .w 1 Page 2 7. The bill provides that the State Department of Health Services shall have the burden of proving that hazardous waste has been deposited on, under, or in land or within 2,000 feet of the land and that the hazardous waste creates a significant existing or potential hazard to present or future public health. J G. The bill requires the preparation of a wxitten instrument to accompany all lease or rental agreements . relating to the land which has been designated a hazardous property 'or a border zone property. 9. The bill provides a procedure for court review of the designation of land as hazardous waste property or border zone property. A draft environmental impact report addressing the Mola project has been sent out for public review. Comments received on the draft EIR will be incorporated into a final EIR. which will be presented to the Planning Commission on December 16, 1980. if in your opinion the pro- visions of AB 2370 could significantly affect residential property surrounding the aforementioned chemical dump site, please let us know as soon as possible so that this information can be incorporated into the final EIR. ' P:JRH:df rr ll AO Ip -�/ � •..,. t s...tr.<•w:• _ .-t,•' i��: ...+.•.a•.......•nr+wu:':::..:�::Y'+t:JttitG.1;�7'.t4»yr,.istri7.'�:':'4'S:'7t7.^'::i�.r-.��r. 'L.. ' ,Y S.irk ' .. _• Fo� B7,t�� CITY OF HUNTINCZ;TON l4ISACN INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION Ht1l/1V(:iC1N�t 4C11 To James Palin Froin City Attorney Director Development Services Subject Assembly Bill 2310, Legislation Date December A, 1980 Regarding Hazardous Waste Property and Border Border Zoned Property HEI40HAND11I4 OPINION STATEMENT OF FACTS : Mola Development Corporation presently has an application pending before the Planning Commission for development of a 224-unit. condo- minium i�roject on the sit! of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chi^a Street. This property loan abanddoned hazardous chemical waste dump. AB 2370 legislation does arfect this property. QUESTION 1: When does AB 2370 go intoerfect? ANSWER 1: The gill becomes law on January 1, 1981. The bill amenda. the California Eiealth & Safety Code commencing With §25117.3. QUESTION Is the city required to take any immediate steps when the bill becomes law? ANSWER 2: No, but the city may apply to the State Department of Health Services (hereinafter called 1'Department") for a determination whether the above described land should be desiE3nated a "hazardous waste property" 'or a rl "border zoned property." Health & Safety Code §25221(c) . QUESTION 3: Who determiner whether property shall be designated "hazardous waste property" ov "border lotted property"? ' PLANNING DEPT, -DEC 12 1980 P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 9260 Jli..+..�.:�.+....vi�:i4�i 6..aa.i .��,A�wC�...:,7..::i7:-+r'r:.7i.'.1-:_.-l:i^,7 t:"li;.i'::• � ... _1....',\{!•!:•.r.......-.........rH. ltt4•w trn..r.a.Hw•:waiN.'.r. '.r*..�...w 1 Memorandum Opinion Re December 4, 1980 Assembly Bill 2370 Page 2 ANSWER 3: The Department. Health & SL fety Code 625229(a) . QUESTION _4: How is such determination made? ANSWER 4: The Department may request any person who owns , leases or occupies land suspected to be "hazardous waste property" or "border zoned prop- erty" to provide information regarding the land, such as, description, types and volumes or hazardous waste, dates and maps. Health and Safety Code §25220(a) . The Department shall issue and cause .to be served upon the owner of the land and the City Council a notice of hearing. -After the hearing, upon the preponderance of the testimony taken, if the director is of the opinion that the land should be designated a "hazardous waste property" or a "border zoned property," the director of the Department shall issue and cause to be served on the owner of the land and the City Council his or her decision and find- ings of fact. Health and Safety Code §25229. QUESTION What is the effect on property if the Department determines the prop- erty to be "hazardous w^.zte property" or "border zoned property"? ANSWER 5: The director of the Department shall issue and cause to be served on the twiner of the property and shall give notice to the City Council orders requiring all of the following; The execution and recordation of a written instrument which Imposes an easement upon the present and future uses of the property which has been designated as a "hazardous waste property" or a "border zoned property. " Such easement shall permit the Department or its representative to ante: ;he land. The easement shall be recorded. The easement shall state that the land deacribed in the instrument is sub;Jec t to a hazard- ous waste easement. The easement shall run with the land. The Department shall order the execution and service of a written Instrument to accompany all lease or rental agree- vent-n relating to the land which has been designated a "hazardous waste property" or "border zoned property." The AM N.w•+....µ.vr.....rw. .•••w. ` � .. ." ... ' "..t'rt'{.. >t.-N f..frer:.(f.t:-i.J.� ' • •.f•^'r:•...r.•r++www.w'•wa'!:i".`.YYWtF.::1.:n:+:i,LYti�{1:n,"Y"L.:nJ:r�i.:'`•�-•��S.wwr+V••4�.1 Memorandum Opinion Rp December 4, 1980 Assembly Bill 2370 Page 3 easement shall contain the following statement: "The land described herein contains hazardous waste or is within 2000 feet or land that con- tains hazardous waste. Such condition renders the land and the owner, lessee or other possessor or the land subjec t to requirements, restrictions, provisions, and liabilities contained in Chapter 6.5 of the Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code. This statement is not a declaration that a hazard exists. " Health & Safety Code §25230. Ir the land is determined to be a "hazardous waste property" ,or "border zoned property," then none of the following shall occur on the land <� without a specific variance' approved in writing by the Department: any new use of the land; subdivision of such land; construction or place- ment or a building or structure on the land which-is intended as a resi- dence or mobile home. Health & Safety Cade. §25232. A determination by the Department that the land in question is a "hazard- ous waste property" or "border zoned property" shall constitute a land ,. use restriction. Health & Safety Code §25236. QUEMON G: How dues the new law affect; Mola Development Corporation? ANSWER 6: -- M Mol al s' property is afrected by the new law at the time the law becomes effective January 1, 1981. If Mol:a has probable cause to believe that; • a significant disposal of hazardous waste has occurred upon his land and he intends to construct on such land, then he shall apply to the Department prior to such construction for a determination as to whether the land should be designated as "hazardous waste property" or "border zoned property." Health & Safety Code .425221. 1 The neprartment may enter anti inspect any real property which is within 2000 feet or a deposit of hazardous waste and obtain samples of the Boil,. i vegetation, water, set up monitoring equipment for the purpose or assess- ing or measuring the actual or potential migration of hazardous waste on or toward the land, survey and determine the topography and geology of the land, photograph any equipment, sample activity or environmental. condition. Health Safe':y Code §25182.5. The Department may, by certified mail, request 14ola to provide any or all A ,.(�.+_lvww.vT'^'n'..it• �. ".'}t,�' fiyf S', -.. • -. a r.'•. ••'Vr�.i:Si ..w..w., ... . .. ., .....-e.--C.�..•nw+n..•..r1:!i•r...+es'a,..:Y" S-.'2'i:\'.:L:..'ii'•7.r:T'«�..C.T"i i•�na' :t,..'�.= . Ole 1 Memorandum Opinion Re December 4, 1900 Assembly Hill 2370 Page 4 of the information described in Health & Safety Code §25220. . QUESTION 7: How will neighboring property owners adjacent to the Mola site within 2000 feet be affected by the new law? ANSWER 7: The adjacent neighboring property owners are under the same obligations and restrictions as described in the answer to Question 6. They will have to provide answers to the questions posed by the Department. They will have to apply to the Department for determination of whether their land is a+lbordet, zoned property"if they wish to construct on 'such prop- erty, Health & Safety Code §25221, It' their property 1s determined by the Department to be a"border zoned propertyp then there will be an easement placed upon. their property to permit the Department to *enter ter Iand. This easement shall be re- corded and run with the land. The easement shall state that the land described in the instrument is subject to a hazardous waste easement. They cannot lease or rent their property unless the lease agreement con- Wt ains m a stateent that the land is within 2000 feet of land that contains hazardous waste. Health & Safety Code §25230. A determination by the Department that their land is determined to be a border zoned property, then that-shall constitute a land use restriction. Health & Safety code §25236. There is a probability that effective January 1, 1981, land values wi11 drop sit the Mola site and on property within 2000 feet of the Mola site The probability or the drop in land value may be avoided if the hazard- ous materials are excavated so that the determination is not made that I , the propel-ty is "hazardous wastr property" or "border zoned property." xf the Department determines that the property in question is "hazard- ous waste property" or within 2000 feet is "border zoned property, an application can be made to the Department to remove such designations after a notice and hearing if the hazardous waste materials are excavated. Health & Safety Code §25234. It would appear to be in the ftnanatal interests or adjacent property owners to have the project area excavated to remove the hazardous waste materials. As long as the hazardous waste materials remain in the ground, l i rF.d7• .k.;". ttemorandtim Opinion Re December 4, 1980 Assembly Bill 2370 Page 5 the adjacent property owners will have their property market values affected. GATT, HUTTON i City Attorney GH: • be ec. f4embers of the Planning Commission Acting City Administrator Jim Barnes, Associate Planner I ' Am • I M.,w.,..y-ram ..••1.rri�iS`�r'�ii;,.i:•.i; �,si:....--..•_+«.....»...,,.vs:r 1vL..A.w. s� .`i. ..:fl:.tl:-v+...«+......�.�.....�..«...rw«.n*r,•s.tn:l+k:4«l.*W:ft ""' �'^^^'•" i].1 y;-.F=,j.• w.._. iTR:�'t::.....rr:e.Tom+.7• .•rt•l7f , huntington beach development services department ST ff WORT-- TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: December 16, 1980 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 79-23/TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1085 / , .1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT No. 80-5 1,0 SUGGEST D ACTION: + Staff reconunends that the Planning Commission adopt Environmental Impact Report No. 80-5 as being adequate and in conformance with CEQA and that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23 and Tentative Tract No. 10853 subject to the findings and conditions pre- sented in Section 9.0 of the staff report. 2.0- GENERAL INFORMATION: On August 20; 1979, the Mola Development Corporation filed Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23 and Tentative Tract No. 10853 for construction of a 224 unit planned residential development on the subject site. A number of environmental issues associated with the project were ,. initially identified by steff and brought to the attention of the Planning Commission. A chronology of the Planning Staff and the appli- cant's efforts et addressing issues Identified in the initial study is contained in the September 9, 1980 staff report (attached) , On September 16, 1980, the project was continued to the December 16, 1980 mecting to allow sufficient time for the preparation of an environmental Impact report (EIR 80-5) . 1 The proposed project consists of four main structures build over semi- subterranean parking and two conventional side by side buildings with parking located within the parking structures. The main entrance to the develop- ment is on Bolsa Chica Street. All buildings will have two stories t built over parking structures with the top floor units having a second story loft. The main recredtion area consists of approximately 25,130 square feet and includes a recreation room, two tennis courts, a pool, and whirlpool spa. f The applicant is proposing to restore approximately three acres of the ` 12.5 acre site to a usable form by excavating the on-site soils known to be contaminated with hazardous wastes and transporting these con-- ! stituents to an acceptable landfill facility. Detailed discussion Of Lhe impacts associated with excavation of the site is contained in EIR 80-5. .!• ,.-r.r._ - ,.....<,�^-........�.»._.-. ..�.......<..ar s,•.:utx rr,-r nzr<.r.•ai+a::::. 7�y;;::•;:�..,,.p.+.,. I i 4 4 I , i , ^fir • 4 CUP 79-23/TT 10853/EIR 80-5 Page Two 3.0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The following have been identified as major issues of concern regarding the project: 1. Whether final EIR 80--5 adequately addresses the environmental impacts of the project and presents mitigation measures and/or alternatives which can mitigate the impacts which are identified. 2. Whether the project is in conformance with Article 936 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. } 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On .September 16, 1980, the Planning Commission required that an environ— mental impact report be prepared for the project. The .environmental impact report (EIR 80--5) was prepared by the environmental consulting firm of sack K. Bryant & Associates. . In accordance with Section 15160 of the State EIR- Guidelines, the draft EIR was widely distributed for a 45-day public review period to allow other public agencies and members of the public at large to review and comment on the EIR. The enclosed document entitled "Addendum to EIR 80-5" contains the comments received during the 45-day public review period and the staff's response to the comments. The draft EIR document and the enclosed addendum constitutes the final EIR. Prior to taking action on Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23, and Tentative Tract 10853, the planning Commission must certify that final EIR 80-5 has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State EIR Guidelines and that the Planning Cominission has reviewed and considered the information contained in' the EIR prior to making its decision on the project. Standards of adequacy for an EIR as stated in Section 15150 of the State EIR Guidelines are as follows: "An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of. analysis to provide decision makers with information which enables them to make a decision which. intelligently takes. account of.. environmental consequences. An evaluation of the environmental effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive,but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in the light of what is reasonably feasible. Disagreement among experts does not make an EIR inadequate. The courts have looked not for perfection but for adequacy, completeness, and a good face effort at full disclosure. " 5.0 ANALYSIS Past and present long term impacts resulting from the existence of hazardous wastes on the site are thoroughly discussed in the final EIR. Impacts associated with the proposal to excavate contaminated material from the site are discussed as well as alternative site �tPjrestoration techniques and mitigation teasures. In addition to the .-'information in the final EIR, two memorandums from the City Attorney '.Rare attached which address responsibilities for off site sous analysis ;xp� 4• �! 1 and the effects of recent legislation pertaining to hazardous wastes 3t •'-� fan" the applicant's and surrounding residential property. ;.,r. n - .,. ,� .........-... ... ,. _... .... ..... .....,-.., -w+..«...w...wnvr.:u:•.w+w..+.mc.'+1T:.T',+fyT'i:,:y'..:i7?... A 5: L r. r Y f {F{,�t �. 1 y 6 s Y t 4�ti 'Y ���ir 1,4�4sct}�,T�k{5��y�1��� 4• � }t'ef� } tF1 '1�'�,tit {Y '�4!`i)�i'�'}'i��'f � 4,� � A; i.,r t, L'� .�-.. tltA ;rt�i.r f°j k�• �,:,) .r<};r.,'�. �,t, �, .�i,.i•f. s, -it :�z+);4�+}:; � ,.,t�.it S ,ut '� � r�s�;�i.�`,1'" f r ^�� day, •''�'v �1r�n" 'r s t. 'h�` ,. y,e. y t it j.:84'a`► �� ► a'.; ••Y.i ,,��,,,i�ti ,.�.d ��"•(�l l.t.. 5,'C. r ,.! tY4r",'tt!� 'r •l.l' .�a ..4, i 'i-;� �{, y':v;.#{:r.l +,i l.'1 F:. '•'!• �t 1'tx,,.Y1 {•S '��•f �+•".S'�'"!°{i,: "u�.'.'Y, !i. "„1 1".R f;'�y�,..41n•.!.'��,.'"i{':f.4. i�•"i`a,}. , t�y i�j1'il�: .++�ir.4 '.f "tti i'. �r .i.� j!l ya lr'.t,?t�y��`t:,rr- 111`rw ,a•f'X',7 tr.:�ljY.•YI�',;.'��,dsk)) f#S �.t„�' .'�'�,f' �•.�+ 5 ,,.i :Pyy�r,�a.,a�{,�I.• x,�. l�� ,1 (l } r r �S`,4,S.w.� •,.r..i' .,. .� Y� �';{t,, t,. ,r i •r f '� , �5�, 1i.,+e t ;t. {���4f�t �; j.). �-.-�1 .;r.4 .:) �a,;,�a,fe-Ya; i .,��<. i'�ti{:aj, .An.t. .p°tl. ),k'f•:•){, tt'' + t}, `X{` ,Fw, .�s f r:�4 i1�•` "ti r+r� S�+'' }`{Cf" i,<: ..!� �,'` r.t),�:!i5).: :,�:.'� ;ro'� ',}* � '' n };•'li. ''`i.,.. .Si;sl; a.r' � G+, ;1� ,:.ti ,b,�j'n r'�. tPe-�j'�, �.,� .! 4 17 t4;<ta,* .,�,t'i Y.,.rij,l' ,.��' � +;y,:;a. '1` "...� f +'�', ��' ',�.•+k'::�f: (j,'•�! � 5..).4k.,t,. * ,}..'iAk"[ :�'� �,. tM �[,�" ) l .: .},,. TF �•}1;;) iy �. IC�� r ,� ! �44r + .+�':'y 1�'�'..>I. .l. `�'iL 7.�,r,•. 1 r 1 •,;., +,, T .• � F ! t d" } ti } � +t�. ��k�.:: •> f'.)�'`. t' rfi 't ,.'> }t, i'��t � �';�: r ��� ` ; r '-'".l,Y r " t.t }1 �. ..� )� 1.. �'1 i 1 ,;`}iF.,:! tr•l ipps� ..{,ppa !� t-A V. 1, Y •i 5v. t rl,+ F La r.1 fit.e i.;li tt5 •rX �13 i�i ?i F�T j� +'a��r:tilrri�i t :)' .:f,r Y�t'YJ�',f °1 •+� ).. �R.d�). {4��Tt �}"i:}'Y �IH' �S ks a+„#, a.,,.,,,f�.,% .✓:.�r. t FrY �r k`a.,�,:, .�,la.�u,r t�:,.s..r..;T,.�•,Z t,�,�i�r.+.�,.-.'�:. r �. �•.:4_- •�t1��:4a,titaF,; ;I;.4 i,r-.,.-;�}:;�'r �Wi • ' CUP 79-23/TT 10853/EIR 80-5 + Page Three ..ii� '1'luIry III otta defivi Nic• w i l 11 thr ,i (i i-vt; i n relation • Y I .I s n to Article 936I :;•'•• , or Lhe Urdinanec Code. The code allows no more than six units side ; ,-fit•" by side. The proposed project has seven units side by side on two - `of the four buildings located over each parking structure. These tau- seven side by side buildings are less than 150 ft. in lenc3Lls. The applicant has requested a Special Permit pursuant to Section 9367 of { :•, ,t ..: . the Ordinance Code. The staff analyzed the excess in building bulk t•:� M't i+ of P•�t,�`.�+Afterg careful the 3review ginal ao£l the suni unique bui first lding on this project. ' q g type and topographic '�.��f�;�• features of the development site, the staff concurred with the deviation in building bulk. 6.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: ; i. The staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt EIR No. 80-5 , and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23 and Tentative Tract No. •10653 subject to the following findings and suggested conlitions of approval. ! FINDINGS SPECIAL PE 1. Through the use of landscape planting materials, aesthetically pleasing architecture and special design and construction techniques, the surrounding uses will have a minimized impact on the proposed project and is turn the proposed project will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of the neigh- borhood or the City in -general. 2. T`se orientation of each of the dwelling units onto private open 5p3Ce, the use of landscaping materials, and the design solution for . a .t#r'que parcel of land will help to insure maximum privacy for the residents within a project of this density. 3. Through the use of hiavy landscape planting and berming throughout the project, and by maximizing the use of aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, the proposed Project will promote a better living environment. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT •7 RMx 1J0 9 23 N I A D TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10853 1. The proposed subdivision of this 12..51 acre parcel of land zoned R3-18 is proposed to be constructed having 17.95 units per gross acre. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation for this type of housing. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for medium and medium- high density residential was placed on the property. L�t.,.;.Y. ., •. ..,... .,. ,. ,. .., ... .,..•,.. - ..... .. .Y.,•..... ._ _.__.......n.an.r.nr...MY+.,,:u•..nt i.l,l r+v;'d:;, .vl:-C'Y::�':"...:"�:T:.T�1►• !t" , yew L Mow MW i t , r f 4' I� T 1� `i i t I '' • ' 1 KY }'y. ' 7f,)am.' T ^} r t� ( 7�'„<-:Z :T1 i� '�'.{'., alti'' �\�'F' °�' •-r`�•' �„•{'�,if4 .6.,•'':T },r-?Tgt tt•r*.rr r,"4r*'},: •y' h'R'A• T?'i I., Y�'• � S. .', i .�.•'J tr., ..I: ,�.. S_ .t..S t„ ��r't.l�'; rr..4 1},•+ �R7�++jt1�r•^S.c, y '� r��, rt e. ! ,',n *"'C+ T 7 r S.•, -L .xY„ ,,� ! j+ �";}•l� •.44,,yy't M•.r '`t i• ley.. •(` '� .. 7' ,, _-. , ,rt }`r�'`A,',`.,< ..it?'s1J",'} I.7•'J r' f t,.1 i ,�,<:".Ijl.,. ., ".,)'Cf; it'r.q+ - ,li�l'.;.1 .5-!• ,' },V �... .#'t ,.Sl,1� +4,;eiN. . '1},x; t,�� 1. b7r S.. �'. '• , t{ t,:'. ,. y..,,: .W" }, r••r "• '.S4r nll..:•. Y� i�.L� tr 1,:.1, •' (( , c. . n ,,r ti^{ Sr >, y S `+\�1 .t ( �,.'�{i7 �."'� 1^y .?7 d.,4�}t''i,�i l' {r A 7 iq,i3... r,r;• ! .} ^ r�'R ,�A'1„S,.i m"1,t.1 T+.1 •1"1 .iM1lu(�y' •'? + .1 4 )� Y t f .i,. ,• .,�, + A. ,.y.,.j,uf k. ,•� �� �` >�.`:" �Y'•1 �l"'G� ;. (� ,.•L":' t.ti' i't�r��i}.}t... S.?�' 2"i• ,t..i.l � :� a.� ���.. 4 m,�f� "S� `' t ..r `it�hi�� 4�new t tE, :rf Y t• ; � � i ? �,1 1��f Lt c t 1:'t n.,_.. A i . � ;,. •xr 4" • C3s4 Z�.., t r.,31r •u,#,, f�.�''�• .k ��b. t�,}•ti , ! � .. t. tt,;,r., ti:, `r.,;� : ��L1 '. .i•.r`��.,�.1 Z• �{ ,#K� �t{. 'F��� •t Y� a�;+. +, , p F,+� * f,t':�'�Y���,Y;.��rtr^r4�.,. ;' .Y:4 R „1.1 t., . 7a5?^ ,S Y , �} .i:�.t. �.•t3''!t'V,•. $;7+!.r ;/, d�r. y,• �. i A rtd1 'its1� {:, i 411+'! l" !h , . S .�pt,Y F;+.l:� i,.� ,• ?�+ a vt *ttr,.�. 6�iY�i'� S ,'���..1 xl� c,t.w,igr,7t y,.;t.,r4 ty'A!k �.r,� i,.!,t,i';r1 t gip,*, ,ar n'�.#A1+�f•L t`• �'tc'4 Mt ,!' {fI1•�1 ,� ,4 ;ifJ"� t.: ,,ti�y,. A„ �*rYp $? ,?•+.ii �.i ,: t �,,, ,cy.ai '1• ,•,q?�,�.•' 't .w �1..? V. ..� •? hlt4;t.. 3i*.'. •�t ••,7;',: 1�,'i14.�Yx.y�11,4 ,4�� {{ } ,'l'.�. � .:�pY ti. '�t�,.,,,i,.�� `•4p ... ��; .s. tt. , r, .°s t�4. Fy�AJ 4�, � :3.4�5,� �i41 31+ e.f1 Y1 yy1� LLk.Y., ,,)>. +}:rt•r:.4!�,4,iJf{ i.``; ' ..1 -)J..I.t�:v"i+C l •y i�,r,.t.�•tt,,� ,t. •i ysl. �"j- ':�}� ,i •a�v 7�,j'�i } y..��� Z�..:, .�"k,,,4�.`.� itf •� f,.R •k' n.(•� tee + ty .' r�4� _Y i"•,a;, t9,., �.. "#�' ': r t �i•t(•+•n4, •y t •YL�tSt.t[t;±.G�' �' 'i^ �'•! t 4`. .S Y � ., :.S 5, •1. tj �` • }••r ,.:wi }:1\'ttt ``i� is 1 '�6,�'1:'�j n 43ti4 t'1' Y ,• +a 4 L , Y' tr', ? YLr, + r ,� { 1 S, r^ .� f.' �7r�. +, 1wY�r lFt. { ,tt � � �y�' . y,� r 1� i ��1. . • �tY tY , t,{4�i{}'�. ,�g,, �••. .;Yr , e �4.$,�.4� ��<, '}e1•;t':��f i�s_it,x«:.'+ *,_n"}.?_.-.rit Y l::.tft re L>�r �lf.ri,. S • ..y 79-23/TT 10853/SIR 80--5 •, CUP , . Page Four and through the use ' j frontage, street width, lemestation features all other design and imp th, 4- The lot size, dap ro osed to be constructed in of a special permit, of- the proposed subdivisiplanseand specifications on Acted With compliance with standaroo pliance with the state Map the City as well as in supplementary City subdivision Ordinance. CONDITIONAL USE pERMIT NO 79_23 i + StJ EgTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - d elevations received and dated • lass, floor pl8rss, an 1. The site p roved layout. December 12, 1g80 shall be the approved the developer slid tared archeoio9ist shall. be retained by 2� A regis the gr ading operation in areaen ntiCorp- shall be on-site during ist determines e ma received from Arcuntil•gsaid archeologMan n these areas. on th map 28, 1979 or ical significance i dated Sep no -,Da jor archeolog that there is shall be stubbed in at the locations d 220V electr ical ' 3. Natural gas an of clothes dryers. facilities, stubbed in at the location of cooking as shall be units. 4. Natural. g and central heating water heaters, � volume heads shall be used i,'► all showers. 5- Low vol wire:# pipe, and s oils, such as unusable lumber, posed of at an 6 A11 building P us or unusable materiale them be lis other surpl ed to ban , . . otfsite facility equipp h resnure sodium vapor lamps Ming such as high P 7. Energy efficient lightlots and other outdoor areas for energy shall be used in parking conservation. considered required firethenHuntingi:on approved es shall be subject to the approval o ,. t3. All aPP shall be de sir3artment• Beach Fire Dep the subject in prdperty shall be constructed i.- on Acoustical 5t'andards sot fortEvidenceits 9. All dwellingsthe State Acous ro ,ertY• compliance with an acoustical analysis the p . consist of submittal of arson experienced in • that lie within the 60 CNHL contours of of compliance shall location for a report. prepared underthe ensupervisiowith the aPP the field of acoustical building permit. -these s see'-m shall be designedn BeachsFireed in Depa�t one lQ- Afire or sprinkler Y b the Hunting lissar with all applicable Fire Oruinancese structures deemecompce5sary Y ance and shall be in e an entry g ro osed at txav aiby she Department ate is p P the: DeP at any tim n shall be reviewed andartm ntPP ~ location and desig n '' cc of Development Services and Fire DF1' i 4 I u �jy t tis , 1V \ ST 1• <: L R's•7 IS'� • irmmlf v S 1 ��tr. 4 omv, t 3 anti .rt "'. ;9�+' 't"T:'ZA"("mr"t"`i}k•.: ',C,[`'t�' terj#.lk< •t\* ; fit k: # _ ) e Y• t a 1 w ,, J J £ "f ,t 11F v ,.c.•,3•r...tT F�' �} .>.Slv�•..= ion, 4� f tt il':l J t tt :t,;t ik .tt. -t 11 r.1•y 4 i i y�. .). tt. 1 •�, :r -+% '{; 1G '.+ ;. :� 'I:,kS':}�`; ;t: •L Lfi '' ,' rc tx; 1 '( .:1f3 Y, /,i�i - �4 ..5 5•. t, _. tn.`£4, ,,� -h �'.3 t .,. , t .; i , < 1 �.r,f�. ::yi,tt.i.:�{b;;tl ���•;:,.Sr � ,.,-. a a v'x.11 •iSS 1 .A* , .�s. . r °•t. " ;'r.. 1 is ,tS � ia, � a 't q �i�t+ t.. ` '; f i � R �. )x ^t•'`Ft'�;. j, v y.'£, ,.: a, t4'rr 1't A. �.� t,s,e:. :. ( ,.' T,�+ rsL;} t .,�'.t�?'��. a.{ •L`r �: )� i'; �`St�1,1'. I� '�z, f �.�I} t:t , ;: f ;� ,ti'_ �l i�i? 1 '��`�•Y, +�a •x.e{i�•t 44r'Ls}�^��t �S., +. . '�1:� •, ii :� 4 .a1y1' �„ ,k' , � i� { 'L .� � 4 Cj) .a,t ` .,,., {.�, 11.e;-, � .,� ,r, 5 ;:Y ^ '' z ..','rl F, •';Y /l. ,<,A ye 4..i.�"1•e' 4 -:.i<) Oil� � A. l' � .L �++,i.r'.Y6 �,.• �J 1�-; ;;it vt�t<,_ �:*S'h7'.r�:�;�S %�r t. � 4„ y`1 !{ !1 «i 4 'Y �L�? } {.,.`4. �t.,1 ,t F q R s,it ! • , �' Ai ( .t i K �+•'],1 1 . S . { �'� Z 4 F�' �i i�"1� ! le. .. A��d +y. •,.,4,' ,4.•'� �"�'s,tir 5�y, �.'t;fir_ ) ,}.�1,'t�"{y� ,�i Y�4'�r �"�4��)+ t,.a, � } �..� �.. T 4 i.s 2{}1. a Y .t•� t .i ��.�)�..�'�.; ."'k 7 •Fg " »tk'. �k ,1. ,..''y.�'-� •t•'1 �,t�.�r�.',a'�:Y .p L,,471 .�. ����„ti, .',54:' �i+,t,�r1 A}�at ��+. !+t�' ` ,'�'�{�ri _y.,,.l i�r-f `t 1 �¢•r'.''• 3���.•�'y:r��L�4 a't yi,>af. t(�(aYY �,:;�; .ti;c ;� �'.�.....�•i1 � }, ,t. rti .t4iit`.:v '�,4 � , f� a�.r- .i '� ..:'-i,G�,j��,i �..,. _,a;1: }`44 i}.�t�S;il.S7 �,��� {�;fit �4i�•��xv..��+�a ar <�4 a�^�d1.�.{t��r•�i�13F1 tYS �� 51.1 cat^.. ,{.t x�t_�� �.y� 1)1 t.t� t•s• J6•..�k �.>k"`• .y, , . 1t•.!)I. li.�QY t4 Y., i•-.,��.. ,1. .i .. .,t �. .k.�Te.i .f.,I .:7. +L.tvs .t. CUP 79-23/TT 10853/EIR 80--5 Page Five 12. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall contain a pro- vision that will prohibit storage of boats, trailers, and recre- ational vehicles on site unless an area that is specifically designated for such storage and is in compliance with the pro- visions of Article 936 is provided within the project. 13. An erosion /siltation control plan shall. be Preoared ana submitted with . the final ,grading plan and be subject to the approval or the City of Huntington Brach Department of Public Works and the California Regional Quality Control Hoard. 14. Hazardous waste materials on site shall be removed from the site and deposited at a State.-approved landfill facility equipped to handle them. The method of removal of hazardous waste materials shall be- subject to the approval of the State of California Department ! of. Health Services. A detailed mitigation plan incorporating the General Plan -of-Action in Section 9.0 of Final EIR 80-5 shall be approved by the Director of Development Services and State Department of Health Services prior to issuance of grading permits. 15. on-site worker safety measures shall be incorporated into the detailed mitigation plan pursuant to the provisions stated in Section 9.0 of Final EIR 80-5. r .6. On-site medical considerations shall be incorporated into the detailed mitigation plan pursuant to the provisions stated in Section 9.0 of final EIR 80-5. 17. An air monitoring prograin for off-site safety shall be incorporated into the detailed mitigation plan pursuant to provisions stated in Section 9.0 of final EIR 80-5. lb. Public notification of the excavation operation shall be carried oilt. pursuant to provisions stated in Section 9.0 of Final EIR 80.-5. 19 . An evacuation plan shall be incorporated into the detailed miti- gation plan purnuant to provisions stated in Section 9.0 of Final EIR 00-5. 20 . A hazardous waste excavation plan' shall be incorporated into the detailed mitigation plan pursuant to provisions stated in Section 9.0 of Final EIR 80-5. 21 . A neutralizing agent acceptable to the State Department of Health Services and South Coast Air Quality Management District shall be used on-site to mitigate the odor impact. Noxious materials ex- posed by excavation and stockpiled while awaiting removal shall be sprayed with the neutralizing agent and covered with clean soil Aft promptly. 'fr•� _-••f....--,5• •r• . ..1,` _n o ...... -t.. ....J. ................ .w...r C.......o•.r.-,r. .. :R..w,.....i7-.,�,..-................ ,� ;.•iP , ir!'1•a7,' r 1 1'd�i�'.,f• r,� .1 1 ��'�1'• � '' Y r f 1 rlf k i-Ttt}"''"� S5 k 1ltkslt ft�)�L�i 1"" 4tyt $ '(i'. t'^"u' ,N +•r r »-,tt , �1i; 14 ' r ;y�, } 11,i �lr r 1 .�11?1141,.�i ;�t.r$• '•[5 '17� t.s�3+.m:g7�`�Crr{ r .T+tkr�rv°,k� r r•r'tat r.. I Lta �i'i r,R, � t.. _ <' +. ..'•-iJ, ,4t� ��+Y �'f�f.4.fi ;li r 1 't. iy 3Ljtt '1S't, :{.v(':t °4 i`itl fl t" r�.f't" +. }1',�'TS`,rt� a +17"- ,} 1 a f.;t• rii '.3er ,t, ;"` .1: }}t'=la ,, " 1+ r \itra 1:+ ?t 1 4. � -t :S�L .1°n i frA''r�} Ili i ~>}"4• F' S'Jyf' .}`�<.�+ ;•t ;fit F! J:tt"( r M,`i���r ,i'r: } j .'} ,c r !�. 2 , 1 ;:� ,irf t � E'•.� , �' :f� ::t t':'�'�� ` 4+i>. ��t ,+za} k�'°{i#itk�i'1y}� �t 1''.f i :#° `��7 r' : 1 t 4 J x� # s�;. � rx � '-1 > i..,; �i:}fin.{f .J i } /'-.: i�{ .! r ��..� j.t �i1:i, rr .;�• 1 .j ,.- a •y`' { rie t ) ♦ ^1 t'd � j... ) 't r,, y' ,rt•c t 4a' ;t, - �, .� kIt7L.r-`1Y° °..Z �.4 t CF Yil ,`rk ,'.. ', , 1 ,.\' ,, �5�- -t', j.•,7 , a , 1�-`t. ;t i � -x,:i - E1��;�,d• ,i °�. ' }r} ,r S � °! S' 1 - -: ...: ... t. +!t•„t (it<�x �ri , fx ,: i ,rdi.`:xj ! r i� � �- Sli.fr k I+r .tt 1� 4''r r X� •l' ', +<, ft-9r ` rt � ;i j+.f.1 ft" tip*�•.Sr r.��t. . t-.. ..,... ".'.i s. ',' :,,, .t�� r .:r• ,f'.�: CUP 79-23/TT 10853/EIR 80-5 Page Six 22. The detailed mitigation plan shall include environmental analysis of the extent of the odor plume via an appropriate dispersion model. This information shall be transmitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District for review. Persons residing within the area of the plume shall be notified of the grading excavation schedule. 23. The removal, transportation, and disposal of waste material on--site should not take place if a Stage I or 'II smog 'alert iu• 'predicted or called. The type of equipment used and routes taken for the transportation of waste materials removed fron the site shall be approved by the Director of Development Servicea, State Department of Health Services and South Coast Aix Quality Management Disi:rict. 24. ' if feasible, a mobile lab unit shall be located on-site for quanti.fi� cation of the constituents present in on-site soils and vapors. 25. During excavation of the site, a marshalling area to hold trucks waiting to load shall be clear at all times. That area should be located where noise and fumes will create a minimum disturbance to surrounding properties. 2-6. Dust pallatives shall be used to minimize dust both on the site and on the street. .. 27. Trucks hauling hazardous materials shall be appropriately covered, labeled and otherwise comply with Department of Transportation, • Environmental Protection Agency, California Highway Patrol, and Department. of Health Services regulations. 28. A spill contingency program as required by the Department of Trans- portation and Environmental Protection Agency regulations and as outlined in Final EIR 80-5 shall be formulated and be readyfor implementation as needed. 29. Structural damage to street pavement as a direct result of heavy trucks shall be repaired at the expense of the developer in cooperation-,., with the City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works. 30. The applicant shall be responsible for conducting gas sniffer tests at least once a month for a period of not less than six (6) months on adjacent properties subsequent to the completion of all grading/ excavation on the site. Results of the gas sniffer tests shall be submitted to the Director of Development Services, State Department of Health Services, and South Coast Air Quality Management District. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 10853: 1. The tentative tract received and dated September 12, 1980, shall be the approved tentative tract. Said map shall be revised to in- corporate a cross section for the street section of Bolsa Chica Stredft TW • i ti,d •` ,fir ' S worm (Y K' l YYT.wryw ..y'!�`y"S'['r"�'("Z r';" ''Z"r'q.�,�Y• •."i""'x"T:,'ZTR'"t*"7'*'CF^^•."�'!1'1'�"^'^"^�.r. v.�r•^t-'^......,c •iae;....y,.. ---r w,- +u�e"'•C ,i � t'.7, . t - t Y +� .t {;r �I� i `l, [� �.: ��s• t - t. _..4i '+�•;1�{,r , t-. :�. 1n.{ .t41.� .� . ��.: ._.lr 1 y,.t� .� , { .i; S R � �, �r 4S c 1 �. e a tc 1 •; i,{ t r s �� `,� t ,fig: 1 ,.'�� � ;1{(1,! t � �� r-s i. +•r9 'y` !i r i _, 1 ti 1a r F`f ! p 1�.. i t �,• .i.s(< „h } yA. ' Z ,. 1 ♦ +. .. { t Y7, T is f r1t { .ti t� .t . .�a rli ^. 1 f t, S .dun{` ! 4_r�}it}l..4+�tr�'�. y.lc f, ` .. 414�1i ,. (ia d ,+:7er,l: .'a L -{ 4: t•.! '...� tv F'.,(. ik ' i. .. �' .. .t. . `t b 5.. .,, ,._ t-.... t 'i-•_ d.,.n i ,S. ..'t .1 ,.t."Is. .,t .lr,,.: fr s:/tip, '. ') .. •{?�(t't.,:+. <t 'i1" 1 J '•' 1 - j ' Y 7 • • • • i• • • 1 ' _ 1 r • �� • i 1 i •„ `Vfw, vl' a'y; • t. •1 y • .4 �'..• t '1'ti + tlri • � ,•�ya L � r ! k a,. Vy4.. fi7 a f �.,,gt ,a� `� }ay 5P �y, r ��' � SR'.. {M i+�. �� rs;�,i �V 1'; h,,,s.:•r�-�yy, y ,�,�4 n ,y}ti: �4 + , i{{ ' -!. `1 ��- 1, _ ,'�1 d t n �, �.!� r r ,iJ1f ,4L 1 1i, y.�'At,• ,, �,�''� 1 �4, .v'. v� .�.' '�. ,'J'.. ri4••.rd +4 .A5.11i'.�1v �� t,.�� �• 1 � ,. aa. 0 iS. ii j`,�y{�. yi..f14 C\t' 11 4L„"'�• 1 .5.�;' r1C �.t•,.b:, +.41 i y. t yh, '�} n�A 7 '..� w 'i i' '.{,'� i r 1"'�. Y.,Y� 1' 'ly 1► Z 1 K'' 1 } �� .�i t et 1... i -y`'� k ntit{`�� `` �`;,,�"� �w'4t•• s`�`� r 1" �' ',t�' ;a'+ i>. �1,y 1•5 4'yy �'a jt� ( t'^r< +tl all. 'tir �1 r `:�+", �` r��, ,1. �j �f� �-s' ,t �"�' i. A•i, �� , S:f =Fi :°,'t5 .r, �. ,.r �� 1v1 `L•�••,EY�� ,, �.. ,--�.• T{ � .ri.i,'.'4. - t+ t,aY' ,`sr �. , al• -- �' ��,k,F'a'r' l%�"s+f•, f� �+f,.{k►`ii J�{4,: � �'�'' ��• '�' �� � }�'." 'a� C,4,d ;';�t't '�R f.y, ,yt�:ih`.•r s ti.' ���� i;'1 '� 1�•�"1' y..;�.. ,r.h75, °.+�•, � s`7��r'�� �, �' ?'v.. '� � r.f }" q;`..Tf�1 r ,�, .5 r '� t1: '.�1 ,• �1 ,� •tv � 5, a ,, r �� � , S y 1. G.; T1.��4. a } ;:y` �r.a3t s' vt{'�aG �:[..�' t '1' h•4�. •'S' 1� !�i ia, '"'`�:�, �e'�yq�. � 5„y. � `;1 '`:.r.:�' k � 4+�� 4 1r,•,y' �{ `,{ �, 1 f 1 k rt b •5'jP.Lt C'1, :"}, r7 i\ + y, t } :. 1 , r �, L. r' r i.�y � 4••1,�at�1 t ..{,� � , 7I a.�. ��.a;y'4a,�� a t•„ a 1�tird -�i' yM.• a�•'i; ',, � �h .h 1� �y,; i , v IN 7 1+?.( ti' t .+ :1 'T'. '�. 'S C�\. 5� '-� t�` ,4•q -�I. •'{ +y�y.,..� a y1�r'r Y • -1t 7 n. y�yk � •.'!�}'. �.,-. 1� '� y,�A 4 �'�� '<<l {. . � .,k , 1' ttrl tti 1 H i.`: ti:a ,� y7.� 1 '. a v .1� 1.r..'�� k S:S` T ouJ.. y�ft,7 }1���..'t,. };.l �l• .! �St, r'� 1v. .:.�{ ' � �Y;R �. �";� �, i+ �Y `{','.� 'y r }.,7,`, � 7M ��, a F1.� ` T,l'(} 1Skp• S• 4�I ?;* " T��fY yyy/,jT V `' �♦,t�• {•'L�+{{�,�23L'�''� YI ' �l�J 5 �r� �fyt . 1� 1� � h .��`�}'+�y J �1 � E '`jSy ;� �,`� 1 T�i 9V �t � ,, t k'SSi?" } n� tt + �( +1"✓�} �,� � 5 rs r� fi1V � h' !• �' 1 1 'f, , •� l� � r � F �� 7+,�1 ..d, 4>rin Ktl 5� 1 'rr `••a�4, t�- �y` .d4y5ta' S��} k� �. ,�+1��\ i'1p1';f<�d � 4o:',C ��� , rh' '� ,y. ��,i. �.Nf{{ ,���,. :`5, 1'�'�.�f-S! y�'.;{1� � !! 4�•r•, �l , r 5k, �X r'ry4, r��� '�1�� •1, ,�; `�1 ...�i�{�A` y ''•'.^ - i �,is 1 1 �fa"t. �-�;`1 i '+'t� �-.. : � ��1, '�A;rLj 1 �' r .h1 ;3 �l{ r4 �� M^��y y � '•t.��4 ) .i t S. ,�. f �� � �'� .�1•. 1 lr�.,,,1 Rf:f� at ?i�r a�i:; 4 L•w 'rs f y >�, 1.1' •P,.a� "�43�4t��� ,,��j�+..�� 'ik.� 11� t, > '� ''; �+'' y�r T 7 �' ;�# �w �1 14.�A )M;{• �� ,y`�'�r: ¢��� 1 ,���"�.i sr SAj'`,k��}�f'�1�i �"�`l i k4 ( {l��y +45 �'t��C .�. .�5j�� a !7� �i ithk �� �++ "�. �, ,,; � f�;. � . :� �� "` i `�+1t�1' �M� � ��s �f9���`' h�AW}'� t��1•'� 9"�,y''y' �� y}�+�,tra'yF� $t`,� ,� { h•, .,s fA 1 i, 1 t1 �1r�. R t1•,ty wJ 1ar ��ti ,6'� A I A A " 5T�'�h `t y,� , �, �j' !, �y F-a" ` S. � ;r'v ` � '�+1 t e �?a'` a• Y rh' ' �.. {r��`'. � r �i` `„� '�'g+ ; �t +� ' �� s ''� ��';'���`i'^�, ; � '� ►� ;�s.�fa: � RA � r'�� '+t { �� p4 r `k��1�Y ;*#'. ?� da�';� t�►�,« y�� ,y 1��V �((4� ��M.�' �5�,�`',pY� ;f,� sy� ,?4. 1 .�� ��N� ,�� a l�i�%� � :''r r �•' t } �"� y►t�R iy$•( � iyz',M14� � ��' ]'�, a ;5M_ 4f,� �1. r ��.4+� � �P "� � � �r 5 � a t�x';� '?! �,}� Tf (,76 { t�•i.51r ;k,yl � 4�I�'t�}Fi' r. e '',:� ;J�' `r� •S v�r��t# ''��. Sd. `1` � �YSf ..r1'-"� '.� � ;�, y�,�'' N1 � r n ���' .'�L,�{. �.�' g., (,� 'li�`.i.�`5, 'tl'Z'�tl;5 ;t�. �� 5 d „R�,•t ,���' y'1S , 1 i�.,�.r,��1�+ 1°s�� rli 4' y�'>��:�5 !1>rk'��'4ti`i :'► i.►r1�'t,� :L:a:• ,r" M' + � ,: '�' �ti x;�";4rkstS t1.�i a,1 S R r "� y. s i'Sa inl`,�, ;� �,yy f�� '� +t��.�r,�1�Y`1.� �,rn`��:n�u.. +t. •� ,• 1, _y+:.r:'.i,�T a'l• �r ,+, � �^.* t }�,Z1j.' t}* y-��4 �•��. � �,,.. r .4 • Minutes, H.B. Plying Commission roll) December 16, 198u Page 3 The Commission discussed the proposal and the information pre- sented by staff and the public. ON MOTION BY BAUE11 AND SECOND BY KENEFICK THE COMMISSION DETERMINED NOT TO ACCEPT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-29 I14 LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT THE WALL HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD WITHOUT DE14EFIT OF AN APPROVED VARIANCE, AND TO SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BY THE DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-29 WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The applicant has failed to prove sufficient hardship as man- dated by the ordinance code to justify granting a conditional exception. 2. Granting of a conditional exception would constitute a grant of special privilege not consistent with other properties under Amilar circumstances and under the same zoning classification. AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Greer, Schumacher, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None , ON MOTION BY BANNISTER AND SECOND BY.. BAUER THE PLANNIVG DIVISION WAS REQUESTED TO INVESTIGATE NOT ISSUING ANY OCCUPANCY PERMIT OR FINAL INSPECTION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT UNTIL ALL STRICTURES ON THE SITE COMPLY 'WITH ALL OF THE PLANS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: ' AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, 14inchell, Porter, Greer, Schumacher, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: .Cg�R.LT.�SZi�1�L.11SF f�R arm NA.:.,��h'��T y�„�F. TRACT rto. los�.�,! UL...�:�NMRNTAI. TM A _3r RJU Ng.. 8.�.�,L� 11 -,rom_ September 16. Z9801 _Applicant: Mola Development Com an ww�.ayewr+rn+.�w�w.n�'wr.w�.w.�. w� To permit construction of: a 224--unit condominium project in a one- lot subdivision of 14 acres located on the east side of Dolsa Street approximately 700 feet south of Warner Avenue. Jim Barnes reviewed the history of the project and the environ- mental assessments on the property, and described the CbjA-mandated procedures which have been followed in the dissemination of the environmental impact report. lie noted that it had been sent to a -3- 12--16-80 - P.C. UK ..-.-.,...,.^,-.., `",.rY...t,}- .. .,. , r `I .. .. iw , ...y.`w_: ..vs._.._., ., .. i . . ,..,....: .......x .•.c.f't.may....,... ..: i .., ,.iS:+.. �.�i.�.. �i� ."tS. 4 . 1 i 1 4 iln�`,��� � .F ti�� �� � j �� t i� ��, F' ti�4 �� "�k!"�'i ••1 � { •r � �1,;,�a� << � t{ ' �'" A :� } }1 �� r1 '� �j `� „fit ?• ay.ir e{,ns� a�t�yryt�y,t�rrtt t` l '�. ��a� a ten,►+` s�wr�t sy�r.►'�aee�a! t'4�oi►ct:R�.l ~�l ��t��� ��t n •T�Y�;�:tn['ts:+�,^+Fw4*xw�i� :t-� k '.,7 4-S i "'�;"";f";.^'•� „"'t ...-r�..�r.«..t: .a:is t�i'..,.t--*t ate* •�•p".y.k F;.^- 7d— 77„7r^'Tk1.r 173-Fn'I!'�'i r. 7„'t"} , ��1�•y,tr. r -1•n .rtl�'. 4 - }'L Y'. ,t..r,.r ,. ,' '+t r t �!-`fit y�, L" P. .. (A3 .fi a .t h!L.S.{ I`�. %, 1. •t. f7i' .<' ' :14!' 1!�;Af tr tt }�{ 4 ti1i5 t ) a r. :' fl7S'al4 .a '•1 ' ' {. ,f,"'y t t t 4 !li I.y 's t , t� '1 `/�: "} s c i t � i� ��. ,1"tr. 1,� lrJ,.'r {.�� G•• �•t' 1 ,?5' -�,ta�•�V,.'4h.i,`'• +,i t . �1jFj. r 1 .�•� 1r, � 'a�. 1 .r .1,,.'.y•t f i r ,x1 4 1. 1 t t �++ �, t 'i gii(+ ..{ '� t'{' � it 1� ''1 "• � i ;r.i° t!f`.. � ;,tt t.s ! „'�� ; :,C,�C .t. Lr f 1 [[u }) c - 1 ;c -•{ �.' ,,t�) y-, M 5, t , �: , t� - 4 4r 3-�t :. �t'i j Alt ri ,ti,.;ty'� .,t. '•,.y.�4►7 ,,{Sjt J }{r �{t•• � 7� jt , L tL ji fs t, 1���t ;',r, -. 4t3t4 .�,t 4 t''ZYa 4r +AA }t tp.,.}}, : ,. 4 :4 '�.t�.1 -�., rr 4�t i ti4 ,t II ,0001 , •>'. ��5�!_l,ix1••,L�',�i ., ?,:i. . . . Minutes, H.B. Pl.annincomAssion eo"`1 December 16, 1980 Page 9 wide range of interested individuals and agencies and their responses incorporated into the final document. Mr. Barnes also brought to the attention of those present two com- munications received from the office of the City Attorney, the first stating that the City itself has no authority to require offsite . testing for hazardous wastes in the vicinity and the second outlining the status of "border zone" properties adjacent within 2000 feet of an identified hazardous waste site after the first of January 1981, pur- suant to recently enacted state legislation. Jim Crisp of Jack K. Bryant & Associates, the firm which prepared the environmental impact report, addressed the Commission to outline the salient features of the BIR: Significant impacts to be expected, alternatives to the project, and mitigation measures to reduce the impacts from the proposed excavation technique. fie described the mon- itoring system and controls contained in the work program, outlining primary impacts and demands on public .facilities which can be expected to occur during the excavation process. Mr. Crisp introduced others of his staff in attendance and offered to answer any questions. Savoy Bellavia also introduced Robert Stone, Director of thr_ Orange County Health Department, and Hillerd Chambers of the State Health Department. a. Chairman Porter opened the public hearing, asking that each speaker limit his remarks to approximately five minutes . John L. Fort, 17192 Greenleaf Street, questioned the objectivity of .the environmental documentation, saying that another opinion is needed. He discussed the question of whether or not a present_ health hazard actually exists on the site and the lack of any real compari- son between the different methods of ha•.dl.ing the hazardous wastes. Commissioner Kenefick asked for clarifi .:ation of the health problem and Robert Stone responded that althout.:h no proof exists at present that the site has caused any human diseases, the County Health Department is still of the opinion that the potential for disease causation does exist on the site, par'-icularly from water contamina- tion, and it is the Department's position that the best disposition of the site is total excavation. Mr. Stone also addressed the type of testing at this point in the meeting, saying that the State Depart- ment of Health could require offsite testing for gas migration. fie concurred with the staff's recommendation for monthly offsite testing ` as being necessary and desirable, but said he would expand that re•- quirement to provide further periodic testing after that prescribed time and if gases are still detected then the trench pipe venting system recommended in the environmental impact report should be established. fie added that this testing would be just as effective if it were conducted at a sufficient number of locations on the periphery of the subject parcel. N.illerd Chamberu of the State Health Department concurred with the recommendations of Mr. Stons and indicated that the people his agency would assign to aid in the monitoring of the site would be trained specialists with a wide range of scientific backgrounds. -4- 12-16-80 -- P.C. r 3 a,�i 1 � tpY� ,�1�• � i ��' � r ( � i � M� w :,;f•r}�lrYtr�V� 'Vy { � + Q �,Y J�cc � L •�� 1� ,}•j ! .'V r�T� Qi'. b. �` � c�T7'1! r1�1 � � �• 7'tT�,, r� 4� •t���, + �� fit' + {, a T MAW r>r MMMI: Mra�ra r' t ;`r ;r r .r t ( :.�,T.�• 1 `Y'T5 + '4: 7',f�:9 ti i '�y`i < 9v r�.`.'1. •! (, rGri�YyX't;''`i` J +tl s.:� �- x '+'/.'���. {a �''lrr�f +t .:�} •.d.kv'tr.1• .a� .rt.' J. it T .Y. -T�/1.`�'; J!. . ', 1.. t l r ,17 . i } � t r t �l q'1 I '•Y I. ...1.a �'�'�! } 1 `r .j � i � �'���;tt•`!'. f t� .t�]ts t�• r•' �,� � rrlt; d �,5'�� :}� e .t4•.+�� '.(!•R i ! '.,deg` �1+!t `S t+ i tIT�� � r a'�' 'tL 'A t �'1,� � ;� •,l} •�� .� J.. ! I � -.�fi. �`t' r. �{ i� X rr ��3 tt� T ! t t r. � :r !e-t' .�, r ! �� .*. 4 dt . �'l } Tt .� ..t � :� / •i- r.. k j` ti :} t ••� Y .��•. 'S- IS .a- 1 r ,1�>` l4''r j'r� �t! t! �1�4 t !��•) r r •�;f ,r{ '{1��, } :l'•, rf� r! �:S` it .1� r�td !.t`i y• t� �'� l ,�� rd a i trf t i �.J � yi ��'-fir. .ls yyi.: 1 _ - •i,: t � f..�, .4 r{1! 1;. !( � ,'� . -f�, ,.r �'�.:Y� Lj 1 � �jF t �•"r L'± t 1� i ,�i-- i. �1 } .�'1�}t!1•� t. \•., Yr w. f• j+`�•.1 h\ �i•.t V t.17, rt(i`(l� T.V ) y�._ �Jr!' :.l .l b i, r!. � ) .�'�'"! �s.�1t`.!��f�,l,,d { �i.tl ,tik,t,r lr+lf,�,�{. S•�+ -t rY j �n4'�Cr� ;�' :.S`rr:�[�+ t {F� 1. .d> Yf..r,t` •t) ,'+•���.,!-^e,•i if r� r ! �r,��'l,!, � r•, .iu. 1 }' ;. ' � ,r r•T�. .l, .Y '• r ,'.!�,f •: 5 � `�}' .it• ` 11 r:r� ${�' t`� �! i., tt. E�. .eta .i.,l`s 1.....,V:��.+ i�i 1. _ d. r• ;� +r . ,t 1.''t , e f� n k^.,�`t Ff;. .. '`\' ►ic(�.rt (, . '}., tt':`: _! •r � I Minutes, 11.13. P"�ning Comnission December 16, 1980 { Page 5 Mike Miller, Development Services Director of the City of West Covina (location of theRK hazardous waste disposal site) addressed the Commissionto discuss the effects on his City, including the possibilityof spillage during transportation. fie noted that BKK is almst at capacity at the present time, and disposal at that site may not be an alternative by the time the subject projectgets under way. Mr. Chambers said that monitoring has been going on at BKK and some minor prob- lems encountered, mostlyhaving to do with the taking of liquid wastes. Jim Crisp, consultant, pointed out that not all of the estimated 50 truckloads per day mentioned in the EIR will be going to BKK - any materials not classified as hazardous { will be sent to Class 2 and 3 dumps. I Michael Knapp, representing the Huntington Beach Environmental Board, discussed the EIR, reviewing the monitoring, evacuation contingency plan, use of an appropriate agency to verify the testing, and the eventual disposition of the materials at the BKK-location. . Ile concluded that the EIR was comprehensive in nature, suggesting only that a performance bond be required to assure completion of the excavation once it had begun. Dian Fort, 17192 Greenleaf Lane, spoke in opposition to the r excavation of the site, noting its unknown effects upon the r well.-being of the surroundinq residents. Nathan Zlasney, representlnq. the South Coast Air Ouality Manage- me'iat*District, said that his agency would lean toward. prudence in this matter, and the post prudent step wuld be encapsula- tion to avoid odor problers. In the event that excavation- proceeds he urged that more attention should be paid to the •. transportation of the waste material and that stand-by trucks be on-site loaded with clean soil if some unexpected materials are encountered. Ile also said they would maintain personnel at the site and would take whatever legal action deemed necessary if any . of the AQMD regulations are violated. John Thomas, 19782 Scenic Bay Vane, cited his own experience !4. . in cleaning up materials and sumps similar to those on the !, , subject site, and expressed the opinion that the best approach is to excavate and be ridof the problem permanently. Charles Beauregard, nearbyresident, spoke in regard to the effects to be expected ontesidents, and urged that if the area is to be excavated it be accomplished as rapidly as possible to ! lessen those effects. fie also askod' for clarification on the ; drainage of the site andwhy there was such a difference in the time projected from the first hearing to the present one. 'Mr. Crisp said that the time change from approximately 30 days to approximately 3 to 4 months is a result of concerns of the 1►' neighbors and the need toreduce the hours of operation cf t:he landfill operation to meetthose concerns, as well as a more •5- 12-16-80 - P.C. .. .a f1lR'i 1'.3•C.`•'t'"j'.t,:1Ra {, t f a „•;iill, s IT;"`.swr••.r�•�.,,;,r., �.'"-'{,;,c :' R.-L r .77 r" '�-"'."w . !rT' A' ••1"S'!��' T"'.±",�,""'+ ; �• ?r , •'�.. '' 1� r. f> ., t�' .2tYS; s + •r!• ".'y,� i .j :y,} r'ti, �� )tiR e ,S ±tl"')yrttjlr7;YAl t " err t �`�,+i ix2 .� }Ai }G,�;. •. f�cf'�°L�t�t{; 1, tP� i't! bw,,l,�1 ilN '. ''.}pjy1:�. ltct'�4�js� :t �. 1} 4S iY, •Pt;t{, a f . 't1�1 '��'r`�aa� t IF Sj ((,.. k t r`+' s';ty {, �•�! #�,,{ 1 � S,� t .Y r rya `d r�r Fit t:1•R,'"\„ ,.}i a t } }Yi t•,5��1 t'.1)�`,tit �r' ,,R:t fi3 �t� r V�lt��,.},� Str.}t'y { -Y:,t`fk s ..St, r,�e!'!• ,41{;. i '1 ,},rJt •S.1{t��} �!i �.`r� r i r S ) t� r.: ti ,},�5't,l,l r�r� t�� , ,�1, is r, :;�`fir h�'.,����1 ,'i1 t�';�Cti�.tf"�i.`, (,,.,�,� ;f.��.�ru.�,�` ,t, j r�! �;�'.�Y�t�` t?, i' .t r r �r.'j..,� }..s' , s.�- -�t•�, 4`lt i t li.q � �k '.k .! Y.t4: t. YS S Y,}' t. { r� 'aS,.. ..�.e ;a r �, !, ..,,, . r/.}, t! r t i{. ,,�` r 1 4 !} *'`}�jai ! 7�y • "�+-� 1`'•iY!� s),'!•C .;tt t .�., ,i � !. 5• •\}t ,"� t {� 1.;.,}P L,i. i 1 l•'17\� c'.{S ltp�•�rh i,r,:�r rr',t`.•,{. ,,S,r�.�rl�1i:},F dry is•!t ���"i�r, r! 'l is t•i,..r IS({ 3�?. fMy 'r S 's.l t�'}•.1' .t:`:t'C'• Li •;' .``� •t l ♦ } � r ,.,t -.* t'i 7r{{;.,! 4t .s. `,, 4s , }. ,t, >,�( �i 's s t tr• 'tt�i ttl 1e 1 t >{�r�t..�. �l� jF t�. ,ti?1•'.iTt �lti v: �111.4.g))�I t i� �lr,,it��r�t', 'h�� ,"S ;A� t�r,,F.�t�''; t':'.}':;'yi;t� � 1.14'�::�:�1�:G.�i. tE.4:r.[!'.;'�} s•. .t'<�. r.. rit� r. .. :'}F•. , .t _ ._, a,; ta,.,i l`'4 's. :.��+[;.ti r"rP' .�' 15�.'l:,. ,r. Minutes, 1t.a. Plannie".) Commission December 16, 1980 Page 6 accurate estimate of the quantity of materials to be rem'.)ved. tie estimated the depth of excavation to be from 10 to 25 feet. Drain- age from the site is projected to be 22 cfs runoff during a 25-year a storm, and will be collected along the southwest portion of the site " where the applicant is proposing a storm drain to go southeasterly to hook up to an existing facility. Margaret Wilson, 168141 Green Street, who indicated that she is representing a number of Dunbar Street residents, said that their main concern is with the water wells. She felt that the short term impact of removal as opposed to the long term adverse impacts to be expected from leaving the materials in the ground would justify immediate excavation of the property. ,, Carol Greenwood, representing the Campaign of Economic Democracy, questioned the effectiveness of the AQMD's monitoring system, which the said is set up to measure smog and not the types of toxic air i wastes under consideration here. She indicated that someone is needed to monitor the site with a better knowledge of the problem. +.+ Ms. Greenwood said that approval of the EIR should be delayed until AB 2370 . is effective in January, so that offsite testing can be im- plemented to better monitor fume migration. Mike Guest, 1732 Greenleaf Street, expressed the opinion that the ;a 'nr EIR needs further clarification in areas of effect • to residents, depths of the chemicals on the site, the time frame for excavating, and drainage. tie stated that he would like to see the materials .eft on the site until a better solution can be found. ,•I Daniel Mathews, 1712 Pleasant Circle, also discussed the agency which will monitor the excavation, the need for offsite testing, and the existence of precedents for the various mitigation meas- ures reviewed in the EIR. ,r Al Danzig, from the Orange County Area of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, said that he would anticipate that at least one of their inspectors would be locked into the project from fir' the day it starts until its completion. He added, however, that they have no sophisticated testing equipment available and it would be up to the developer to provide such equipment. Mr. . Stone also pointed out that the County does not have a capability to provide anything approaching a continuous monitoring effort. Frank Mola, developer, spoke in support of excavation, outlining .the time and effort which he has already put into the project. tie informed the Commission that he will be meeting with BXK representa- tives prior to excavation and, in response to a question from 1 Commissioner Kenefick, said that he does not think it would be feasible to excavate the site in the event that the BKK dump site were unavailable to accept the hazardous waste materials. Mr. Mola also indicated that he would like the burden of further test- ing of the area to be shared by the governmental entities which have permitted the problem over -a period of 40 years. --6- 12-16-80 _ P.C. w`.f.:v.<:';5,::;:'•i:`. .. ., ,..�. ..., tti,�. .,...,. ...sra+n:^.,.. ,,.t„'.. :l'. .._ ..,,rc r,l. ..........-.�_....__—.•. -..............+...+........u.+.'.'w.a ait�il•[^',T"..3;f{:( , I 1 .M t� 1r F r ,L T 1 }r Ri, y NOON r � 7", " 1 +..t ' + s,Tt. 1....r , t } �., l. t I R i : t• S i ' {i 51''' .. tf ,{ tC tt { i+ r 4 „r. ; t• , i1�di Y i , j¢��' '3'r � ,.:14 :' 't i. f *'r �, h } � i:�.� �{- {. °a.' r i ?,� �,r .:i�, ,�, .i �'i;•? 'It �•�"{' } . '^, > }"+ '{ .t;�lt.ti•.�.. ,, ,i f�){! h+,1�v++�sa4� .�j'�:?;: i VA - 7 ! . .,1?�;'1:}.ttil',i?! .j•';`� 3 't`.:i: t' r,,rJt ++e:•ll � ',+ `tl:e{.45, 1 ,.�t•.t.��rl f� rq {. {+1, i t iy 1 1 r,t y i •l. { ,.,i' � t•'f'S y 11i �,7.�_� t tt,''�,'i1 'f f� ��t',1�.�- 1�'Y �,}v+,.t .f,i t�.�. :ti,y�-�,: NZJ�.. .t.+.�.t,�} ;Z#;fit. t ,I ,'f�ll, t 1,�1. 14 �ie' t .. tt•• :t rr�((°t,.•t i j.t.t,'� t ,';1'� n ti t.� J• �t ", ? tf (1 ttt +e=�'?ppr.. +,E�:tii !A'�k �;({' ° � ` i,.�iX•,. f f:'�t+,,:til.'TCiit'.,:', �%'. 7 fie•:' 13;� } � t, �(��,j'•«:�:,.,{_c�;�.,;�; 1 Y..: Minutes, H.D. Planing Commission r December 16, 198u Page 7 Cynthia Doc' , Chaparral Lane, expressed concern with the declin- ing property values of adjacent properties after the effective date of the new state legislation which will designate proper- at ties within 2000 feet of a identified dump site as "border zone" properties. She said the obvious solution seems to be to � excavate the area, and urged the City and surrounding persons �}r to cooperate with the developer to accomplish this. 4 There were no other persons to address the proposal, and the ' public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued, taking into consideration the types and quantitates of materials on the site, the impacts zo be ex- pected from the transportation of such a quantity of excavated soil, fencing of the site, and possible bonding for completion of the excavation process. Particular emphasis was placed by the Commission on a continuing monitoring program during and after excavation, taking into account who would be responsible , for overseeing the testing, the location and frequency of test- ing .operations, and contingency plans. in the event unexpected contaminants or excessive gases are encountered. It was the con- census that the developer should be responsible for employing an '+ outside laboratory for the testing program, in addition to the testing previously indicated by the SCAQMD and the health depart- �. merits. After discussion between the Commission and the propon•- ent it became apparent that obtaining a bond of this nature would be a practical impossibility because of the difficulty of setting an upper limit on the probable cost of the operation. Savoy Bellavia reviewed the suggested conditions of approval s and proposed modifications to reflect the discussion by the Cam-mission. ON MOTION '� ON BY B ANt.LSTER .AND SECOND HY HAUER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 80-5 WAS FOUND TO BE ADEQUATE AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH .THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND WAS ADOPTED BY THL FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Greer, Schu- macher, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY BANNISTER AND SECOND BY PORTER CONDITIONAL USE PER- MIT NO. 79-23 WAS APPROVED, THROUGH TILE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR SEVEN UNITS SIDE--BY-SIDE( WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. Through the use of landscape planting materials, aesthetically pleasing architecture and special design and construction -7- 12-16-80 - P.C. '.; IIv t , r r -`•4Ye N ;)i# . fat t •t ' `� of aR � ,.•r�.+1.w�.,'!'4.. +`t �S i YFA'C �t}t Y t;���- •�t �t i. �r�i �fl'. •,«.trc .1777 '�r.,"�iy'"• Y "+,�?'Y�:'i1 1 "1.�. i` t Y. �,•TF 1 f ro .t a ro r 4 i .�J "!} � .. r-+j�'�1, •�. �=ak tit jf} t }. y >� Ts - F.t.. t.hlya } 1�, 5i' { �.s.f t ri �#i' {e ; i' yf �ti + t� t" 't ii 1 '�S r }� t Y ! �' . ( Y. 1�1 e X;; tit }.; .t �; t1 e iro, i� , 4; +, a. ta'Y. j , t+a =, t tp t ,ia•r ti• °'xT` •l;",}' r-. (t.{ ai ..'.ay.it� 7; i.r ;'t� i,{ ,(''1 �t .'t:r.�.4 j\j�M1"�`i"'a}"t�X•,Sr ro {f w.}.,•;,.�Y'j, 11 ta'Fq'� #•.ro.±! �,,.y -zero i.l, J +.,ly .ti rt:,1 ..i, ,t tY { ,r. +t#1�.:,7 .t.1 r/.t }.Cry tt ; Cs � t ,rs' ti-,t 1.,. Rj... 1 (l)�t5 i, i T� �A�•l.r•i \j`C" ��'. t y. a ti y'1.}Z,+ Yr 14,,. ! ^' i t; } -t ':1l. t } i#a 4 et: .tit ii•., t- 4 F.ttY;'ttr ` i'��1t�T';t•,t tag et'.l a X ; ^l t. tt• .��;'.�EKP..}➢ti.• i .} j , y +- t y .0 t r .. r _ ( ?. ,(Y r ♦ t 1 r iJ r{"• • [ • t .' � � a' t, } - t�y t�� � !. ?1 Y Ft � •t t.^ .t . .+tin •gel tt •i-'i}� i: rl i'igfk,} t..�i"x 1Y ♦ It !•�� V. r t 't.� t � ''�.'t?.t't,'i, ftQi1 ! '.t •1 a _i #t, .rx � f,�t:1Fi [t,Yt ,! a ry td. '` ' .�t:''t.�''.4i �b t. /-} l .. � X �f \t 'C,..t i. r y. ,at�.: U .q,{l .a t4.,.f.'�tr,.fr?• t r� Tk,� 1J tt a t r:� #. t f,�s�e t.,�-• ?, G`t',`;.'tt;t� it.: a liiaS t', ay 11 "•t 3� t 'i.:h .l'Ii '.:y ,/t^�',7t 1`a tr .#.. .� tt� 1a ..1Y1 ,; kt:� S. y;" �• i �..t t. S�!S,��t,. k' � • i. t� rY ;. rs! .i,.�i�:/ .I,�+a�, Xj ��1 ii�#��'3 �� t :x.�. X l•�:. ,i�, i 'y.t rS[t ar R'1.+t`1`•'Y,-:;. tS `f t �:�2 J•'A•, � � 1 l,� 1""+ r , y w+;t�, ..tt 1 t'.t'� i.. .s`.� t•y tj.;. p� f t �, .�::ro••`�i;"st:Y, t lrolhF.ro. } ,t `!; �, i<t R •' %`.} a 1 ty t mot. {� .� 4 7 # '.. p`� `t.. i t•� t t 1 t� !{ .4 � �, }~ t r t ` � 5 .r't l.•. 4(,_{!'.t it �. ka ! .R 'fit �1Xt t��• ai 1 i }.: �. i t t` .t "� �1 Y t .s C ! �j: �5 it � {`.�.# r� a y., n tt,i rt t[t��'d�,t a t ,F `t to tr t+;, • a a,.X i r ;*,4r +. �( C= �. 4X�. .dY„ `�•, a i f•ej t � u f� l Yt&�. .r t i � t a.Y Ij �k, t 6� L �;�; i,. ,,,'ii.•r ._. 'j.t.... . . ��`-.,...,.rY'r i . .tr .. � .,. .S .yt t..•it.,.A t''..7.. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission December 16, 1980 Page 8 techniques, the surrounding uses will have a minimized impact on the proposed project and in turn the proposed project will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety, and con- venience of the neighborhood or the City in general. 2. The orientation of each of the dwelling units onto private open space, the use of landscaping materials, and the design solution for a unique parcel of land will help to insure maximum privacy for the residents within aProject of this density. r I 3. Through the use of heavy landscape planting and berming through-- out the project, and by .maximizing the use of aesthetically . pleasing types of architecture, the proposed project will promote a better living environment. FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PEM11T NO. 79-23: 1. The proposed subdivision of this 12.51 acre parcel of land zoned R3-18 is proposed to be constructed having 17.95 units per gross acre. ' 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation for F this type of housing. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for medium and medium- high density residential was placed on the property. 4 . The lot size, depth,. frontage, street width, and, through the use of a special permit, all other design and implementation features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be construc- ted in compliance with standard plans and specifications on 'file with the. City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplementary City Subdivision Ordinance. t ' t; CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plans, floor plans, and elevations received and dated December 12, 1980 shall be the approved layout. 2. A registered archaeologist shall be retained by the developer and shall be on site during the grading operation in areas de- picted on the map received from Archaeological Resource Manage- ment Corporation dated September 28, 1979, or until said arch- aeologist determines that there is no major archaeological significance in these areas. I 3. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the loca- tions of clothes dryers. + � 4 . Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 12-16-80 - P.C. I y�r , r µ, 1` 54d f V +tr ,:xn-:,.Y. •r;i •,;-,r-,• t;• ,,•tC-c"..ryr+.T- . :'R Ti`Cit YtS, "T�'1",-w�r"'T'J"'".•,?i"t`.'r.,� ;r"".`�,'tnaia.I' I ,�:A '�`!k ,jtPS�tefr�� tt rS�i•{+"pit-.rF�•4'! F'i' ��tiyF F:,1 t nr'JTI"'1 'n1o�'1•r•'!T-r-' •-T ..'fir .i'T, �. t 'x �.r . .4:t .r 1�.I• `. '�.it t .1 f•,, r l.t. t J t•� - >. tj.' t e I\yti i '< rtf ��, f (t r 4 \i ",rSl 1 T ,r 4i# f i' 5 IA { .�+ }., S L (4 ! ?l•',.A y� rl \# - it<1 f'i if •�j 1` f r u�+ �" <: ri' '.k, �! +t •i t 7 l ,r � t p, i. •{,.4 a�.% \'•, #+t" .Itt,y•t -� -1 •,-: Yl�'` t } , ,��,. y• ,3 ts�,Et fr. '.Sit.' A{: �{ r # !,jr l} �'r \��. {••, }..��`.'�,l•?�.�,'("�i, "1.'jti.� °3 ` .'P9', yy #1. �; S 1 i yit. .A^ .. b..+ ,t l Y 1 IP ,! J 1 .�, LL i1 1 � ` •t'. (��,i.�• ;y�".S�t,4 iUri ",t. ,, '� � t+_ e �It t r r,+."r '�i:\,t{,} ar#t �, Fs +��1}� �,q't ,,"4,#�,yi=".•` r'7xl.'ttit• ,"�� � ('.y(,;t,,lE �`itt ?+�1�,��P,=�"+\t,•..r}j,� j1} 1' - r Y 1 {'• t#.:i -t t .r, r1 x ss`J :°;• R tt } .i•i1 1Lt- {�t��iPii�ii � f ir•'ti� /;`s'.q!ttil.F hl1t� t �'.S\\'}ir<:a: '!�w Y\ ,.�c• J1},i„ 7 �.fa{ K�?'jt :':I�r�,#t�"• ja 't' d d ,"1,SF;'.. � �6 1,.; o.:�t . .t.rt,i,+ .�: t. r�1X�a iS.��' �"t<, �4 t\ ��'�• ,a. �1 .�� r t, r } ,1 Y I rr{ p s ` �r i!i } i V i j• !�r il`� R t., Fac�$'�, ��ti.. �C�r ,tr *r a(R.�j.i,! '•;•4er [.f ?.�F ce� E 1 1 1 {A 0.•. 'j '.�; , i.�q i"t .� y F I' r`. 1.r,. \..:1 yi ,�,�Y {�t, `rt:# �'^.r�.'l. 4r•• yir q��'•-r '4 l"S- p- IY':.# ', t t _6�, •i �lcl tr�>ti��j?#t�rr it'S'�r�l-J��rA.�}M .`�r�t��..i.':����t�`.r`J�.,,•��';l'7A��� \.; � �, efl�'f��..�?J�t y�•..rr ,i.����•3.�S.itll,.sF���1:;a1^S.a lY j��1T e�4+�.,ty'i_r.�i\a�J�*:'t i�3t�r4ir�i1 r`1!�'."J� .Lr 'r ,. tl i .1 2y,. .F.SJ'i' :ri,`J:.�.�i,A.I:.P•. %vY .�. r. Minutes, H.B. PY"''ning Commission (� December 16, 198v Page 9 5. Low-volume heads shall be used in all showers. 6. All building spoils, such as unusable '.umber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable materials shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 7. Energy-efficient lighting, such as high pressure sodium j vapor lamps, shall be used in parking lots and other out- door areas for energy conservation. 8. All approved drives shall be considered required fire lanes and shall be designed as such subject to the approval of the Huntington Beach Fire Department. 9. All dwellings on the subject property shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal - of an acoustical analysis report prepared under the super- vision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for a building permit. 10. A fire or sprinkler system shall be designed and installed in those structures deemed necessary by the Huntington Beach Fire Department. This system shall be in compliance with all applicable fire ordinances. 11. If at any time an entry gate is proposed at the main en-- trance, location and design of such gate shall be reviewed i and approved by the Department of Development Serviceo and t` the Fire Department. 12. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall contain a provision that will prohibit storage of boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles on-site unless an area which is t specifically designated for such storage and which is in compliance with the provisions of Article 936 is provided ` for within the project. 13. An erosion/siltatio. control plan shall be prepared and } submitted with the f. i1 grading plan; said erosion/silta- tion control plan shaj. ',e subject to the approval of the Department of public Woi of the City of Huntington beach and the California Region,. '•eater Quality Control Board. la . Hazardous waste materials on i.i.- site shall be removed from the site and deposited at a Stat. "mproved landfill facil- ity equipped to handle them. The ' trod of removal of hazardous waste materials shall be . '^Gt to the approval of the State of California Departmenu t!nal.th Services. t A detailed mitigation plan incorporatii,-, General Plan of Action in Section 9.0 of Final EIR 80-5 ^reby made a part of these conditions) shall be approves. the Dir- � I -9- 12•-16-80 - P.C. , ��,•a i. i I S )'1'}�,4 ,IJ NW, ��, �' °` 11 �'� ly i' df y L Y .It ,y • � • Minutes, H.S. Plannii"'Commission rj December 16, 1980 j Page 10 ; ector of Development Services of the City of Huntington Beach j and by the State Department of Health Services prior to issu- anceof grading permit. ' Z Also prior to the City's issuance of a grading permit for ex•- cavation , the developer shall submit the following for the i approval of the Planning Commission: 1) A contracts from a properly rated dump site for disposal of the hazardous waste.- and 2) a firm proposal from a qualified laboratory on the mon- itoring of the site and the frequency and method and type of testing of air quality, water, and soils that are to be meas- ured on the site. 15. On-site worker safety measures shall be incorporated into the detailed mitigation plan pursuant to the provisions stated in Section 9.0 of Final EIR 80-5. 16. On-site medical considerations shall be incorporated into the detailed mitigation plan pursuant to the provisions stated in Section 9 .0 of final EIR 80-5. program for off-site safety 17. An air monitoring p g y shall be incor- porated into the detailed mitigation plan pursuant to provi- sionsstated in Section 9. 0 of Final EIR 90--5. m 18. Public notification of the excavation operation shall be carried out pursuant to provisions stated in Section 9.0 of Final EIR 80-5. 19. An evacuation plan shall be incorporated into the detailed miti- gation plan pursuant to provisions stated in Section 9.0 of ..Final EIR 80-5. 20. A hazardous waste ex avation plan shall be incorporated into the detailed mitigation plan pursuant to provisions stated in Section 9.0 of Final. EIR 80-5. 21. A neutralizing agent acceptable to the state: Department of Health Services and the South Coast Air Quality Management �'. District shall be used on site to mitigate the odor impact. Noxious materials exposed by excavation and stockpiled while awaiting removal shall be sprayed with the neutralizing agent and covered with clean soil promptly. +" 22. The detailed mitigatio-.t plan shall include enviro_ mental analy- sis of the extent of the odor plume via an appropriate dispersion model. This information shall be transmitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District for review. I3ersons resid- ing within the area. of the plume shall be notified of the 1 grading excavation schedule. 23. The removal, transportation, and disposal of waste material on the site should not take place if a Stagg I or II smog alert is pred PC ted or called. The type of equipment used and routes y t� _10-- f ki i 4..7. +`� �\1�} C�' +Y k4{ k rt •s ti 1 \"� y�{'t Ti.' •�; ,{1 K t V t t 5 !L ��`�� tit. � �� ♦ PT-1 � � , 3i1' � f i . ..� ,'(�,"� '� :• �ti..�L, % h �• •� *� t t S"ti, �,� i' •'3,}, 'y`'� � + '" b. t : +,.s .�Fy 4 t � .' '1. t'i, 4: � ry� ltl i�:. e � �� �}.�'1't",. � 't?'�'tik"°!il��;.� 4'��yi��,t ICAi�"�,tI.', �',: ���•y}, ;'� �±�� `� A�, ,� }•� . 9'���u +"t'��T�t'L t' '�� ll9y i E ` 5,41 • � Y��ii ��!'St `�•q�. ,i i�, +y:l�>; y ! ty��t3L' ,� ^, t y i i`�. ,•���E�j ���.i�q tr �� � ��„ •� �i�y�4,,• r+�,vt �#t{�, ' YY �� �y) y �` '��t ,t .�'G tl�` ' `�it4yf7 J Minutes, H.B. P,nning Commission i December 16, 19t Page 11 taken for the transportation of waste materials removed from the uite shall be approved by the Director of Dev- elopment Services, the State Department of Health Services, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. 24 . If feasible* a mobile lab unit shall be located on-site for quantification of the constituents present in on-site soils and vapors. 25. During .excavation of the site, a marshalling area to hold trucks waiting to load shall be clear at all times. That area should be located where noise and fumes will create a minimum disturbance to surrounding properties. 26. Dust palliatives shall be used to minimize dust both on the site and un the streets. 27. Trucks hauling hazardous materials shall be appropriately covered, labeled, and otherwise comply with Department of 'Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency, California Highway Patrol, and Department of Health Services regula- tions. e 28. A spill contingency program as required by the Department �,. of Transportation and Environmental Protection agency regu- lations and as outlined in Final FIR 80-5 shall be formulated and be ready for implementation as needed. 29. Structural damage to street pavement as a direct result ' of heavy truck traffic from the project shall be repaired at the expense of the developer in cooperation with the Department of Public Works of the City of Huntington Beach. 30. The applicant shall be respons;ble for conducting gas sniffer tests at least once a .i.onth for a period of not less than six (6) months a:: lofations along the property lines of subject site subsequent to the co;.:pletion of all grading and excavation on the site. Results of these gas sniffer tests shall be submitted to the Director of Development Ser- vices of the City of Huntington Beach, the State Department of Health, and the South Coast Air quality Management District. If gasas are detected through these tests, additional test- ing shall continue for art additional Six (6) month period. If uses are still detected, then specific measures which are acceptable to both Statc and County Health I' apartments and to the Director of Development Services shall be takers. 31. The site shall be completely fenced both during excavation and grading activities and the construction phase of the project. i 1.. i _11- 12-10-80 r __.______._.�___------�...�...:.�...........r.e......,...,..V.m.xr.nre:'regar:*�atc1&�nlufri►:�m:.." n�` • Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission December 16, 1980 i Page 12 AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Anchell, Porter, Greer, Schumacher, Bauer ' NOES: None ! ASSENT: None ' ABSTAIN: None l ON I•fOTION BY BANNISTER AND SECOND BY PORTER TENTATIVE TRACT NO. ' 1.0853 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: ` 1. The proposed subdivision of this 12.51 acre parcel of land •zoned R3-1B is proposed to be constructed having 17.95 units per gross acre. r 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives For implementation of this type of housing. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for medium and medium-high density residential was placed on the property. 4. The lot size, depth, frontage, street width, and through the use of a special permit all other design and implementation features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in com- pliance with standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemen- tary City Subdivision Ord i nance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The tentative tract received and dated September 12, 1980, shall . be the approved tente.tive tract. Said snap shall be revised to incorporate a cross section for the street section of Bolsa Chica Street. 2. The water system shall be through the City of Huntington Beach water system. 3. The sewer, water, and fire hydrant systems shall. be designed to City standards. 4. The property shall participate in local drainjye assessment dis- trict requirements and fees. 5. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department � of Public Works prior to the recordation of a final map. This system shall be designed to provide for erosion and siltation can- y trol both during and after construction of the proposed project. _ -12- 12-16-00 - I .C. j rr Minutes, H.B. P Bing Commission December 16, 1980 Page 13 6. All access rights along Bolsa Chica except at the intersec- tion of the private drive shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. AYESs Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Greer, Schu- macher, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None A'3STAIN: None TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11245/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 80-56 Applicant: Mansion Properties, Inc. (Cont. from 12-2-80) To permit a 29-let subdivision or 2.2 ac:::es of land located on the east side of Lake Street between Yor;ctown and Utica Avenues. Savoy Bellavia reported no further information to submit other than that contained in thc, staff report. Dave Eadie, representing the applicants, addressed the Commis- sion to urge approval of the map. He stated that in his opinion the ownership of the railroad right-of-way is not an issue and that the findings for denial are not justified by fact, as there is no reference in the General Plan as to what width a bicycle trail should be and the 20 feet on the easterly side of the right--of-way should be more than adequate for that purpose. He also indicated that the finding of non-conformance because a portion of the right-of-way of Yorktown Avenue has not been vacated could be handled by a condition of approval. Commissioner Bannister concurred that the width of the trail was not addressed in the Bike Trails Implementation Plan and expressed co»cern that the Commission might appear to he denying a request on the basis of something that "may" occur in the future, Staff and the Commission di3cussed the areas of non-conformity, - and Secretary Palin outlined the steps to be taken by the applicants to eliminate those non-conformities and bring the proposed map into compliance. 014 MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY SCHU1.1ACHER TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11245 WAS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASO1]S, BY THE FOLLOW- I14G VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: i �1. Pursuant to Section 66474 (a) of the Government Code, the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans insofar as the proposed alley is located an ? -1 3- 12-16-00 _ 1,.C. 1 huntington beach development services department Sraff EPO TO: Plann=ng Commission FROM: Department of Development Services DATE: September 9, 1980 CONDITIONAL U§E P OMIT NO. 79-23/TENTATJVE TRACT NO. 108.53 Nf nT1VE DECLARATIPN NO. 79-59 Applicant: Mola Development Date Acgepted: 417 N. Main St."A" August 31, 1979 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 flaNDA-TORY.PROCE5$.NG DATE: kngineer: Dan Greek & Assoc. 3 September III So. OrangeSeptember 20, 1980 Orange, Ca. 92666 ZONE:: R3- 18 Locatjon: East side of Bolsa Chica GENERAL PLAN: St., approx. 700 ft. south Medium and iligh Ver,sity of Warner Ave. Residential r n guest: Construction of 224 condominium EXISTING -USE: project on a one lot subdivision. Vacant Acrgaq: 12.5 acres 1.0 *GENERAL INFORMATION: f` On August 20, 1979 the Plola Development Corporation filed !! Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23 and Tentative Tract 10853 t for construction of a 224-unit condominium development with sub- I terranean parking on a 12.5 acre site located east of Bolsa Chica Street and south of Warner Avenue. The project was initially scheduled for consideration by the Planning Cemmisvion on September 18, 1979. Based on the staff's initial environ- mental study of the project, three major issues, of concern were � identified, including archaeology, soils, and drainage impacts, i It was indicated in the staff's initial study presented at the i September 18 meeting that :.he project site lies entirely within I. ORA-83 as depicted on the C.ity's ?archaeological Zesources Vap. The staff's initial study further indicated that a potentially hazardous, highly odorous chemical substance could underlie the site. This information had been derived through consultation with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and j A•t M,t3A { Page 2 tows review of the applicant's preliminary soils report. Finally, the staffs initial study indicated that the proposed method of drain- age on the site could significantly affect adjacent properties. Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23, Tentative Tract 10853, and Negative Declaration No. 79-59 were continued by the Planning Commission and the applicant was directed to submit additional information and develop appropriate mitigation measures to mitigate archaeological, soils, and drainage impacts. The project was considered at five subsequent Planning Conur.ission meetings (9-27-79, 10-2-79, 10-16-79, 11-20-79, and 12-4-79) . At each meeting the project applications were continued at the re- quest of the applicant to allow sufficient time for preparation of the information which had been requested by the Planning Commission. Finally on December 4, 1979, when it became apparent that the applicant's report on the effects of previous chemical waste disposal on the site would take a substantial amount of time to prepare, the Planning Commission with the concurrence of the applicant tabled action on the project for an Indefinite period. A complete chronolog- ical packet of the Etaff reports presented at the meetings cited above, as well as copies of the minutes of those meetings, is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Following is a brief chronology of the Planning staff and applicant's efforts at addressing the Planning Commission's concerns in regard to potential environ- mental impacts on archaeological resources, soils, and drainage. Archaeological Resources: On October 2 , 1979 the attached letter prepared by Arc aeolog cal Research Management Corporation (Figure 1) was presented to the Planning Commission. In brief, the letter states that Theodore G. Cooley, of ARMC, conducted a literature and rerords search and archaeological inspection of the 12.5 acre site and 9e:cerally found that due to the substantial amount of previous subsurface disturbance on the site there is little likelihood that any archaeological remnants exist. ISoils: On September 13, 1979 the senior engineer with the California Ae-g onal Water Quality Control Hoard stated in a telephone conversa- tion with the Department of Development Services staff that a portion of the 12•-acre site had been used "for a short period of time as a receiving site for refinery sludges, these having a very considerable concentration of mercapta.n, a highly odorous material." The conversa- tior was recorded in a memorandum by the Department of Development Services secretary and attached to the September 18, 1979 staff report presented to the Planning Commission (Figure 2) . On October 2, 1979, %he Planning Commission adopted a motion to pur- sue a negative declaration for the project on condition that it be supplerented by additional information as follows: An engineering firm specializing in landfall displacement shall be retained by the applicant to conluct additional analysis and recommend specific mitigation of adverse chemical and soils conditions on the site. The firm selected shall be subject to the approval of the Director of JJ -evelop- ment Services. The final report shall be subject to review of- the Planning Co=ission prior to consideration of the project. r .,a Page_ l �! The firm of Jack K. Bryant & Associates was retained by the appli- cant to conduct the additional analysis. On October 4, 1979, letters were sent by the Department of Develop- ment Services staff ("igure 3) to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, South Coast Air Qlrality Management District, State Department of Health Services; and orange County Health departrier requesting any comments, recommendations, or suggested mitigation measures regarding the potential existence of chemicals on- the subject site. A letter dated October 10, 1979 (Figure 4) , was sent by the- Calif- ornia Regional Water Quality Control Board to the Department of Development Services stating that the Board's staff had experienced long involvement with the Bolsa Chica dump. The letter briefly documents the past history of dumping activity on the site and indi- cates the CRWQB staff's concerns regarding disturbance of subsurface materials an site. On November 5, 1979, a preliminary report prepared by Jack K. Bryant & Associates was submitted to the Department of Developm=nt Services outlining the test methodology for assessment of chemicals an site. The Department distributed the preliminary report to the following agencies for review and comment: State Department of Health Services, State Department of Water Resources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, California Regional, Water Quality Control Board, South Coast* Air Quality Management District, Orange County Health Department. The preliminary report was distributed to the Planning Commission at its November 20, 1979 meeting. i On November 20, 1979 letters were sent from the Orange County Health Department (Figure 5) and State Department of Health Services (Figure 5; � to the Department of Development Services. The letters make specific recommendations regarding actions to be taken by the City and the proposed analytical methods to conduct chemical analysis on the site. j i On November 28, 1979 a meeting was held in Huntington Beach with City staff, the applicant, Jack K. Bryant & Associates, and repre- sentatives of the State Department of Health Services, Orange County Health Department, and South Coast Air Quality Management District present. At thF- meeting the applicant voluntarily agreed � to conduct additional subsurface sampling on the site based on recommendations by the State Department of Health Services. It was further agreed at the meeting that Jack K. Bryant & Associates would work closely with the State Department of Health Services in i determining the methodology and content of the analysis. A full transcript of the November 28, 1979 meeting is on file in the office of the City Clark. At the December 4 , 1979 Planning Commission ineeting staff indicated to the Commission that the applicant had voluntarily agreed to fµs_ conduct additional subsurface tests on the site based on recosrar.enda- tions of the State Department of Kealth Services and other concerned ,. Cr Page 4 agencies. The Commission was informed that the additional soils tests would result in a final report prepared by Jack K. Bryant & Associates incorporating results of the new tests, comments from reviewing agencies, and appropriate mitigating measures. The letters received from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (10-10-79) , Orange County Health Department (11-20-79) , and State Department of Health Services (11-20-79) were attached to the staff report presented to the Planning Commission. At: the re- quest of the applicant, the Planning Commission tabled action on the project to a date uncertain pending submission of the final report by Jack K. Bryant & Associates. On December 19, 1979, the attached letter from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (Figure 7) was sent to the Depart- ment of Development Services and Jack K. Bryant & Associates. The letter expresses AQMD's position at that time regarding any disturb- ance of the refinery waste materials on site. The letter 31--stes that AQMD "would strongly recommend that these disposal sites remain undisturbed unless the developer proposes a plan to neutralize the odors as the excavation takes place." It was suggested to Jack K. Bryant & Associates by the Department of Development Services staff that such a plan be developed and incorporated into their final report. In February, 1980, a document entitled Preliminary Studies and Pro- osdd metbodology for the Sam2ling and Anal s s of Soils an Su - �, surface Gases at the Boucher Landf 111 S..te in Huntin ton Beach was submitted .by Jack K. Bryant & Associates to the State Department of Hea u Health. Services. The docment outiftYd the methodology„ to be employed in preparing the final report which had been requested by the Planning Commission. A copy of this document is on -file in the office of the City Clerk. On (larch 6, 1980 and April 22, 1980, meetings were held among repro-- 'sentatives of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Orange County Health Department, Orange County Water Department, 1 Jack K. Bryant & Associates, and City staff regarding the effects of II the industrial waste underlying the site on the groundwater table. In a letter dated March 26, 1900 (Figure 8) the California Regional Water Quality Control Board requested that the scope of the Jack X. Bryant ; Associates report be expanded to include an analysis of groundwat%r quality. On July 15, 1980 a preliminary draft of t-•e Environmental Assessment of Soils, Groundwater, and vapor Impacts r. the Former Boucher Landfill Site was distrihuted to the following agencies: U.S. En- vironmental Protection Agency, State Department of Health Services, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Orange County Health Department, and Grange County Water Department. The cover letter prepared by the Development: Services :staff invited representatives of the agencies to a technical briefing on the report scheduled on July 31, 1980 in Huntington Beach, and requested that all written comments be Bub- i mitted by August 7r 1960. The technical briefing was attended by representatives of the State ' Department of Ilea:.th Services, South Coast .fir Quality Management. • `l a I A �I Page 5 ` District, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Orange County Health Department, Jack K. Bryant & Associates, the applicans and City fstaf26 . * At the July 31 briefing representatives of the agencies present agreed that complete removal of the hazardous materials onsite and disposal of the materials at a Class 1 landfill Site is the most feasible and acceptable method of mitigating long- term groundwater, vapor, and soils impacts. It was acknowledged by all of those present that a short-term odor impact resulting from excavation of onsite materials would be unavoidable. A transcript of the July 31, 1980, meeting is on file in the office of the City Clerk. in subsequent verbal and written communications with the Department of Development Services staff, personnel at the South Coast Air Quality Management District changed their position, indicating that removal of the contaminated soil in the manner suggested in the Jack K. Bryant report would be unacceptable because of the potential air quality impacts. on August 13, 1980 the Department of Development Services staff arranged a meeting in Huntington Beach at which representatives of the State Department of Health Services, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Jack K. Bryant & Associates, the applicant, and City staff were in attendance. The purpose of the meeting was to gain further clarification of the agencies' positions regdrdizig the proposed method of mitigating adverse impacts on the site, Based " on the positions stated at the meeting and subsequent communications received from both agencies, it is the staff's conclusion that AQMD and the State Department of Health Services are at an impasse on the issue of whether or not hazardous materials should be removed from the site. Drainage: It was indicated in the staff's initial study that, accord- ing to the Department of Public Works, the applicant's originally proposed method of drainage (sheet flow onto adjacent MWD property; could cause a substantial increase in the amount and velocity of drainage water deposited on the adjacent property. In accordance with a recommendation by the Department of Public Works the Planning Commission at its October 2, 1979 meeting included the following coi.dition pertaining to drainage in their motion to pursue a negative declaration for the project: In accordance with a recommendation by the Department of Public Works, a prelimii.a=y hydrology study indicating the method of drainage proposed, with calculations on volumes and pertinent information on construction methods, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review. The findings contained in the preliminary hydro],yy study shall be presented t;, the Planning Commission prior to its considera- tion of the project. The applicant has revised the pp project design to include a drainage �Asystem which would connect to a master-planned drain pipe to be constructed at the applicant' s expense across the adjacent MWD `sG property. The attached letter dated August 18, 1980 (Figure 9) from City o Covina was also invitc�d to attQA the br;efitr] after rc nrt:in a onlrry of t preliminary reirrt. 7 c J� I 1 i 1 rage b the r:etropoli-an Water District states that�.*M is willing to grant the purchase of a temporary easement to the *applicant to facilitate construction of the storm drain. The revised drainage system is acceptable to the Department of Public Works and will mitigate the drainage impacts described in the staff's initial study of the project. 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the City's environmental procedures, a draft negative declaration was published in the local newspaper for a 10-rday public review period ending September 10, 1979. During and subsequent to the public review period, substantial concern was expressed bJ other: agencies and individuals regarding soils impacts, archaeological resources, and the proposed. drainage system for the project. On October 2, 1979, the Planning Commission was advised by staff that if an EIR is not required for the project a Negative Declaration must adopted within 105 days of acceptance of the project applications. The Commission adopted a motion to pursue a negative declaraL i for the project on condition that supplemental information be submitted by the applicant addressing soils and drainage impacts. Through the process of consultation with other agencies, the requested informa- tion on soils evolved into 4 comprehensive, highly technical report assessing soils, vapor, and groundwater impacts associated with pre- vious industrial waste disposal operations on the site. The report, ,. which was prepared at great expense to the applicant, meets all of the requirements originally outlined by the State Department of Health Services, Orange County Health Department, and California Regional Water Quality Control Hoard. From the onset, a concerted effort was made by the Department of Development Services staff to consult with all responsible agencies, thereby ensuring that their concerns were reflected in the final report. The report is technically defin,�:3 as information supplemental to the staff's initial study of the project; however, from a practical standpoint it is the staff's view that the report represents a total effort at presenting full disclosure of the envi.ronmental impacts j caused by the disposal of hazardous materials on the site. Prior tc taring action on the project applications, the Planning Commission is required by State law to either adopt a negative declaration or require an environmental impact report for the pro- ject. Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code states that "all local agencies shall prepare . . . and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on any project they intend to carry out or approve which may have a significant effect on the en- vironment. " 3.0 ANALYSIS: The information requested by the Planning Commission at its October 2, 1979 meeting regarding soils and Urai.nage impacts has been com- pleted and is presented as a part of this staff repert. The public hearing or. Conditional Use Pcrmit Ila. 79-23, Tentative 11rac•t 10053, and Negative Declaration No. 79. 59 has been scheduled for the 4 `"yc. r September i6, Planning Commission mesa'')ng. • N ' This study session has been scheduled to allow the Planning Com- mission and the public adequate opportunity to review and comprehe the extensive amount of information generated through the environ- mental review process. The Environmental Assessment of Soils, Groundwater, and vapor Impacts prepared by Jack K. Bryant & Associates concludes that onsite soils are contaminated with low levels of hazardous waste materials, that certain g,.s vapors are generated on site and are migrating, and that groundwater quality has been affected by leachate generated from onsite materials. A significant potential odor impact associated with any site disturbance has also been iden! ified. Mitigation measures discussed in the report present a broad range of approaches, available for site restoration. Several viewpoints have been expressed by public agencies which have been requested to review the report. As mentioned earlier, a major disagreement exists between the South Coast Air Qetalit'y Management District and the State Department of Health Services regarding 'the mitigation recommended by the consultant. In their letter dated August 25, 1980 AQMD states their "opposi-- tion'from an air quality standpoint to the proposal to excavate . " the site. They further state that . . . "the community will be exposed to airborne toxic gases and particulate matter. The Bryant report does no,: provide sufficient information to determine whether the concentrations of such materials in the air will be sufficient to pose a threat to health in the exposed community. There will bole a substantial odor impact extending beyond the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed odor mitigation measures will be marginally effective at best. The use of sodium hypochlorite or calcium hypo- chlorite for odor control as suggested by J.R. Bryant & Associates, Inc. , may result in the generation of chlorine gas when coming in contact with acidic materials in chlorides known to be present at the site." The State Department of Health Services in their letter dared September 3, 1980*(attached) states that . . . "potential explosive hazards of methane generated in -ire fill, the odor problems, as well as oozing of the material up to the surface, mandate an immedi- ate mitigation effort " on the site. "Considering the toxicity information and the present and possible future modes of exposure to people in the area, we feel that the Excavation alternative as proposed by the report affords the most protection and is the best alternative in the long run. There may be short-term odor problems associated with this alternative, but we feel this can be controlled by appropriate grading techniques and chemical treatment. Acute exposure to workers . can be controlled by proper personal protective equipment. These vapor concentrations found in the gas wells are representative of the vapor content in the fill and if they approximate 'worst case' conditions their emission during =xcavation will probably not pose a health hazard to residents in the surroundinU conununity, considering dilution effects and short-, exposure timrs. " Comments front the State Department of Ilea 1 th SC•r'ri.C:�:; were not re- ceived in time to incorporate them into tt;4 final report prepared by Jack Y,. Bryant L Associates. • � Page Provisions of the Govertiment Code require that the Planning Com- mission approve or deny this project by September 20, 1980, which is the one-year anniversary date of the official acceptance of the project applications. ATTACHMENTS: Figure 1 Sept. 2@, 1979 letter from Archaeological Resources Management Corp. Figure 2 - Sept. 13, 1979 memorandum from tha California Regional Water Quality Control Board Figure 3 - Oct. 41 1979 letter from the Department of Development Services to oaer agencies Figure 4 - Oct. 10, 1979 letter from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Figure S - Nov, 20c 1979 letter from the Orange County Health De- Laartment *Figure 6 - Nov. 201 1979 letter from the State Department of Health Services Figure 7 - Dec. 19, 1979 letter fr:,m the South Coaut Air Quality Management i, atrict Figure 8 - Mar. 261 1580 .letter from the California Regional Water Quality Contx%r:l Board Figure 9 - Aug. 18, 1960 letter front the Metropolitan Water District Sept. 31 1980 ?etter from the State Department of Health Services Site Plan and Elevations JRs:af ��-� i • ' ' • e'0')nunt1ngton beach developp'o"`!. , servlcss depsrtm*nt STAff . AEPOR TO: Plannipq Commission rRCHs Development Services DATE, tieptoWnr 16, 1980 Sc0 DN ITIQI3�jt..�sS RM�T Q,r 79••�31T 1 .Y� MUT No. 1Ge53 A22licapt: Mola Development P-aJ,e ACc to 417 N. Main St."A" August 31, 1979 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 tiANDATQBX JR!2SeENQ -DAZ: Dgfneer: Don Greek & Assoc. October 22, 19.79 Ill So. Orange St. Orange, C4* 92666 ZONE: R3--18 j�r�tion: East aide of Bolso Chica GENERAL_PLANs St., approx. 700 ft. south Medium and High Density of Warner Ave. , I Residential j Raaueat: Construction of 224 condominium EXIST';LTG Ua,E: project on a one lot subdivision. Vacant Itulaw 14 ± acres I1.0 StIOESTED ACTION: . C If the Commission adapts Negative Declaration No. 79•-59, the staff in recommending that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23 with the use of a Special Permit and Tentative Tract 10853, I� both with findings and conditions as outlined in the staff report. If the Commission determines that an Environmental Impact Report is } required, staff is recommanding that the Planning Commission obtain concurrence of the applicant to continue said applications for 90 days ` or less in order to allow adequate time for preparation and review of the Environmental Impart Report. 2.0 GEHEML xtl 00MTxON; On August 20, 1979, the t:ola Development Corporation filed Conditional Use Permit No. 79--23 and Tentative Tract 10853, a request to permit the development of a 224 unit planned residential development. The prcposed project conaiata of four main atructures built over serni- ' Dubterranean parking and two c*nvoutiorial aide by aide units with. 1 � 4 T S _......._ - CUP 79..23/'TT.10853 Page Two %01-parking located In the structure. Amenities on the project include a recraacional area including a recreation room, two tennis courts, a pool and whirlpool spa. The proposed development consists of two ti story structures built over parking structures with the top floor - units having' a second story loft. Additional background information in provided in the attached staff report dated September 9, 1980. 3.0 �512lMARY S•,TT;E5 s After considerable review of the project, the following have been : identified as major issues of concern: 1. Whether or not a full Environmental Impact Report should be•pre-- pared on the proposed project. 2. Several deficiencies erisst within the proposed project in relation to Article 936s a. proposed structures exceed the minimum building height of thirty five (35) feet. b. half of the units consirurted above the parking structures consist of seven (7) units side by side exceeding the permitted '' six (6) units side by side. c. a deficiency of seven (7) parking space -. 4,.0 EUMIMON MENTAL STATUS- As indicated in the September 9, 1980 staff report, the Planning Commission on October 2, 1979, adopted a motion to pursue a Negative Declaration for the project on condition that supple- mental information be submitted by the applicant addressing soils and drainage impacts. The staff and the applicants consultant presented the requester] supplemental information at the September j 9, 1980 meeting. As stated by the Deputy City Attorney at the September 9 meeting, prior to taking action on the project applications, the Planning Commission must determine whether an Environmental Impact Report is required or whether a Negative Declaration should be issued. Sections of the Public Resources Code and State EIR Guidelines cited by the Deputy City Attorney at the September 9th meeting are as follows: Public Resources Code Section 21151.5 - "Each local agency stall establish by ordinance or resolution timo limits not to exceed one year for completing and certifying Environmental Impact Reports and 105 days for completing Negative Declarations. . . Such time limits shall apply only to those circumstances in which such local agency is the lead agency for a project. Such ordinancus or revolutions may establish different timo limits for different types of claboes or pr,rjecta but dll nuch limits shoal: be mi aDurcd CUP 79•-23/T-T 10853 I Page Three from the date on which an application requesting approval of such project is received and accepted as complete by the local agency. The ordinances or resolutions required by this section may tirovide for• a reasonable extension of such time periods-In the a-ent that compelling circumstances justify ad,sAtlonal_ time qnd the Rrolert an2licant consents thereto." State EIR Guidelines Section 15083 - "A Negative Declaration shall be prepared for a project which could potentially have a significant erfec4 on the environment but which the lead agency finds on the basis of an initial study will not have a significant effect on the environ- ment." state EIR Guidelines Section 15084 - "If the lead agency finds after an initial study that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency must prepare or cause to be prepared an En-•£ t: ronmenal Impact R6port. . . An EIR should be prepared whenever It cai be fairly argued on the basis of substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. . . An EIR should be prepared wbvn there is serious public controversy concerning the environmental effect of a project. Controversy not related to an environmental issue does not require the preparation of an EIR. State; i:IR Guidelines Section 15080 (d) (2) - "Where a project is revised in response to an initial study so that potential adverse effects .ire ini ti ,gated to a point where no significant environmental effects would occur-, a. Negative Declaration shall be prepared instead of an EIR. If the project will sti,cl result in one or more significant effects an the: environment after mitigation measures are adder; to the project,, an EIR shall he prepared." State CIR Guidelines section 15054.2(b) (1) - "Completion of a Negative Declaration: within a 10:3 day period shall include the conduct of an initial study, public review, and the preparation of a document r.:-�ady for approval by the decision--making body of the public agency. Completion within the 105 day period need not . include the approval of the Negative Declaration by the decision- making body. Prior to approving the project, the decision-making body shall consfdar and improve the Negative Declaration. " If tb(! Planning Commission determines that an EIR is required for the project, the Commission wculd have to secure the concurrence of the applicant for an extension of time pur.seiant to Section 21151.5 of t'he 11ubl is Resources Code. _SURROUtdDIttf, 'LpNI N L Ust;S� AND f;F?JFRAt, pjC AN Dl:$IGttATIot7; tam Thr. Subject pro,�erty fs larat:cd on tl,c c=-►eft t:idr of Dols', Chica street, approximately v65 feet sc"Lh of War Warner Avenue and In presently vacant. The subject pra ert.• is zoned 10-18. c �►a CUP 79-23/TT 10853 Page Four Properties to the north of the subject site are zoned R2, and partially developed with single family residential units. Properties located to the east of the subject site are zoned R2, developed with multi-family residential units and designated on the General Plan as Medium Density Residential . The properties located to the south of the subject site are presently vacant of development, zoned R1, and designated on the Land Use Element .as Low Density Residential. The property directly in front of the southern portion of this; project consists of approximately 3 acres and is presently developed with a Medium-High Density Multi- , Family Residential Complex. This parcel Is designated on the Land. Use Element as High Density Residential and. is zoned R3. The properties across Bolsa Chica Street to the west are zoned R3, designated on the General Plan as High Density Residential and is developed with a Medium Density Residential Complex. 6.0 ST T��AL INFORMATION: 6.1 Number of Units - 224 Y 6.2 Area of Project -- 12.51 gross acres r 6.3 Density Per Acre -- 17.95 units per gross acre 6.4 Building Type -- 4 Main Structures built over .semi s'.ubterranian 'l parking and conventional side by side units with parking located in parking st:ructurGs t: •6;5 Site Coverage (allowable - 50 percent) proposed 40 percent 6.6 Common Open Space - Required 134, 400 sq. ft. Proposed 214, 000 sq. ft. , , r..p 6.1 Parking - 512 spaces required 505 spaces proposed 'L' t; t 6.8 Bedroom Count - 96 one Bedroom Urrits: 128 Two Bedroom Units r, 28.1 Bedrooms/acre r' 7.0 SUBDIVISION CGh1141TTEE: r . 30 Cotton ttee nick and reviewed on /�urtsr.,t 147�, the .Subd rvi s i n i t:he proposed nrcr )erV . The nta.jor• . is nuvr. of conrortr expresser at the 'Comintt.te a mccLino inrintird a nuitilivr of i tutus by thy• Fi rt-f Dopartinvnt. for Nvi-va-a"d tit•i vc` widths, 'additional fire vmergercy 6ovo:as, and the reRui rrnu•nt to provido a run f i rt• npri nkler systam t t,hrnunhnut all of the strurt urea on t lio iiropos:rd pi oJert. The Depart mont or pttlo ir. No; k. had ronvor nrs on t ht• p:ulsosc d rlr•a roam, tiY.K.7�^•'�,tY+w.y( .,�+.Y_'%.•:r.li`P♦31 i^..,.. ��i. .1.r.-w'..w..a .�.:�,:'.i..i•.. .. .. -.ei:'+u+:.,.... ..__Y. .....+....r:ir:luuC'C.e:r.•e.r....w......,w,.....r...•.r+.t+ca.wwL.xv. . I t c r1 dUP 79-23/TT 10853 Page Five ~ for the project and the Planning Department required that the Tentative Tract be revised to show half--street sections on Bolsa Chica and dimen- sioned cl.ev4tions be submitted. The Planning Department indicated that no other major problems existed with the proposed project In relatioh to Article 936. 8.0 ANALYSxS: There are three (3) deficiencies with the project in relation to Article 936, Planned Residential Development. The first deficiency is an increase in building height. The code allows a maximum of 35 ft., the proposed project in some areas exceeds 40 ft. from the finistied' grade to the top of the roof Line. The second deficiency is the number of units side by side, the Code allows no more than . six units side by side; the proposed project has seven units side by side on two of the four structures located on each of the parking structures. The third deficiency is• a reduction in the required parking from 512 required to 505 provided. The staff has analyzedthe ,increase in building height and the excess in building bulk during the original analysis of . the first submittal on this project. After careful review of the unique building type and the topographic features of the development site, the staff con- curred with the deviation in building height and bui)d irg bulk. However, the original site plan showed 523 parking ispaces, 11 over the required number. The revised site plan shows 505 spaces, 7 under the required. It is the. staff's feeling that several areas wi.thiz: the project can be expanded to incorporate 7 additional parking spaces and bringing the total number of provided spaces in line with the 512 spaces required. If the Planning Commission adopts Negative Declaration No. 79-59, the staff is recommending that the Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23 with the use of a Special Permit in order to deviate with the building bulk and the height and to requires the developer to revise the site plan and provide 7 additional parking spaces, bringing the parking in compliance with the code requirement, 9,0 SUGGESTED AI;,; ON: If the Commission approves Negative Declaration No. 79-59, the staff recommends ?inpz ;,oval of Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23 and Tentative Tract 10853 ojf.i-k the following findings and suggested conditions of approval: i �b ._Ir^ ~f+�.,. .. wsa:t.7+s Rif Fll'!,::.tr i",'V!'1t:i..:tT.1'1y+ia•; }t • A ---�_.. .ten (_ • CUP 79-23/TT 10853 Page Six FINDINGS: SPECIAL PERMIT, CONDITIONAL, USE PERMIT, AND TRACT SPECIAL PERMT: 1 . Through the, use of landscape planting materials, aesthetically pleasing architecture, and special design an3 constcuction techniques, the surrounding uses will have a minimized impact on the proposed project and, in turn, the proposed project will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of the neighborhood or the City in general. 2. The orientation of each of the dwelling units onto private open space, -tile use of landscap-inc{ materials, and the design solution for a unique parcel of land will help to ensure maximum privacy for the residents within a project of this density. 3. Through the use of heavy landscape planting and berming throughout the project, Mid by maximizing the use of aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, the proposed project will promote a better living environment.-, CONDITIONAL USE PEIII4IT 140. 79-23 and TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1OB53: ,. 1. The proposcrcl subdivisirm of this 1.2. 51 nacre parcel of land zoned 113-19, is proposed to be constructed having 17.95 units per gross acre. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land ` use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation for this type of housing. 3. The property was previously studied fer this intensity of land use at the: time the land use designation for medium and medium high density residential was -placed on the Property. 4. They lot size, depth, front-,ngc t street width, and through the use of a Special pormi.t 311 other design alid i.rriplem' entatlon featureaa Of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in c:Ompliance with standard plans Land sPecifications on file with the City as well as in complianre with the State Map Act and supplemen- tary City subdivision ordinance. SUGGESTED CON.')_JTIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONALS USE PERMIT NO, 79-23: I. The site plans, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 11, 1980 shall be the approved layout, floor- plans, and elevations. 2. A registered archaeologist shall be retained by tine developer and shall be onsite during the grading operation in areas depicttea on the map received from Archaeological Resource Management Corp dared September 28, 1979 car until said archaeologist determines 0 that there is no major archaeological significance in these areas. , ..:•';~., �r..wtrr�ccAr„ro+nvrw+s.,r7sS�gR-;�•'�. "(,we�i�:�•.-•mow•j i I CUP 79-23/TT 10853 Page Seven 3. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at t' e lova-- tion of clothes dryers. 4. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, grater heaters, and central heating units. 5. Low vol}ime heads shall b� used in all showers. 6. All building spoils, such as unused lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable materials, snail be disposed of at an off- site facility equipped to handle them. 7. Energy efficient liclht-ing, such as high pressure sodium vapor lamps, stall be used in parking lots Lo prevent spillage' onto adjacent areas and for energy conservation. A. All approved drives shall be considered required fire lanes and 'shall be signed as such to the approval of the Huntington Beach t?ire Department. 9• Ali structures on the subject property, whether attached ,or r detached, shall be constructed in c0linpliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for emits that lie within the .60 CNE1, *ontniirn a the property. Cvidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report prepared under the supervision of a pernon experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for a building perinit. 10. A fire sprinkler system shall be designed and installed in those structures deemed necessary by the Huntington Beach Fire Depart- ment and shall be in compliance with all applicable provisions. ll. If a•L any time an entry gates is proposed at the main entrance. location and desion shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Development Services and the Fire Department. 12. The convenants, conditions, and restrictions shall contain a provision that will prohibit s:oragc of boats, trailers, and recreational vehicl<?s on site, unless an area that is specifically deaic�nated for such storage and i.s in compliance with the provisions i of Article 911, are provided for in the. project. 13. Hazardous waste materials on site shall be removed from the site and deposiked at a State-approved landfill facility ecuipped to handle them. The method of removal of hazardous waste materials shall be uubject to the approval of the Director of Development Services and State of California Department of Health Services. Ve A detailed mitigation Plan indicating the schedule of excavation and construction activity from start to completion of the project shall be subject to t-he approval of the Director of Development Services and the State of California Department of Health Services. •�'. :4,w...«......r..r.• `"'k. t" :1` :s..wM••.»......_r,.: .T.'T•i,.. ..,..,..��:w�.i�»w t."'aR�.i.� �`••TM.,.'n�.i�''�. t i Y , CUP 79-23%TT 10853 Page Eight 14. Grading/site excavation shall be completed during dry months and -micro meterological data shall be assembled to determine the period of days (through the estimated duration of the grading phase) most likely to minimize the odor impact. 15. The detailed mitigation plan shall include environmental analysis of the- extend of the odor plume, via an appropriate dispersion model. This information shall be transmitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District for review. Persons residing within the area of the plume, shall be notified of the grading/ excavation schedule. 16. The detailed mitigation plan shall contain emergency evacuation procedures for persons living within the odor plume. 17. The detailed mitigation plan shall include a toxic vapor monitoring program for the purpose of recording levels of potential air contami- nants during the grading/excavation phase of the project. 18. A neutralizing agent acceptable to the Director of Development Services and the State Department of Health Services shall be used .on site to mitigate the odor impact. Noxious materials exposed by excavation and stockpiled while awaiting removal shall be sprayed with the neutralizing agent and covered with clean soil promptly. The detai' mitigation plan shall include the most effective odor control metho.,r selected by the Director of Development Services, State Department of Health Services, and South Coast Air Quality Management District on the basis of a thorough evaluation of alternative methods. The mitigation plan shall include analysin of types of oxidizing or deodorizing agents, application methods, equipment and supply, adequacy of backup equipment, personnel training, monitoring, etc. 19. The detailed mitigation plan shall contain specific worker protection and safety procedures. 20. The detailed mitigation plan shall contain measures to adequately collect and dispose of excess liquid from the spraying of neutralizing agents on site. 21. The removal, transportation, and disposal of waste materials on site should not take place if a Stage II Smog Alert is predicted or called. The type of equipment used and routes taken for the transportation of waste materials removed from the site shall be approved by the Director of Development Services, State Department of Health Services, and South Coast Air Quality Management District. 9,(ti �`Y ,,.... ..A.�...�`y.v.,•'`,..t,.. .N c-t.r3i:Y::r'.ea+'.\l:.w.M.w 4::.,':r..., ....L'..o.,-�.�..... �«,,.vyyll;FaViI L.LL"f"'7; ' • 'i. .,1r. ... .... .viz=:.7xts•�37i7�3:�f•-:�+5.c"5 CUP 79-23/TT 10853 Page Nine 22, The applicant shall be responsible for conducting gas . sniffer tests at least once a month for a period of not less than six (6) months on adjacent properties subsequent to the completion of all grading/ excavation on the site. Results of the gas sniffer tests shall be submitted to the Director of Development Services, Scata Department of Health Services, and South Coast Air Quality Management District, 23. Unleso immediate project construction and mitigation takes place, the project site shall be completely fenced in a manner which would restrict access as much as possible. 24. All measures deemed necessary by the Director of Developmont Services and State Department of Health Services shall be taken to insure adequate worker and resident safety. 25. All material and equipment. deemed necessary by the Director of Develcpment Services, State Department of Health Services, and South. Coast Air Quality Management District shall be continually on hand to insure that excavation can be stuprc:k and the waste ' be covered in event it should become necessary. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 10853: 1. The tentative tract received and dated' S ptember' 12, 1980 shall be the approved tentative tract. Said map aha11 be revised to . incorporate a cross section for the street section of Bolsa Chica Avenue. 2. The water system ,hall be through the City of Huntington Beach water system. 3. The sewer. , water, and fire hydrant systems shall be designed to City standards. 4. The property shall participate in local drainage easement district requirements and fees. 5. Drainage for tjio subdivision shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of a final map. ' This system shall be dosigned to 'provide for erosion and siltation control both during and after construction of the proposed project. 6. All Access rights along Holsa Chica except at the intersection of the private drive, . shall be dedicated to the City, of Huntington Beach. SMB:JRB:gc AMACHMENTS: I. Area Map 2. Staff Report dated Sept. 9, 1980 3. Negative Declaration No. 79-59 4. Site plan, elevation, floor plans received -and dated • veptember 11, 19Q0 • a 5. Tract Map received and dated September 12, 1980 �' • ,j.';w+. ie,. �+.•..r~. �^fi.i.-..�.t 4+.. .. .a.+.w-..�� •. _ 3..�.'.... 1 a - .... :t..r.w... ...t..,.Y, ri:•:'.i. .a :.. a +^'y��^^w.r . k ,. ..iliZi.. .,ir,p"(r`:�`'-•i-+i�W.�S.,J}µhi t s, f Minutes, H.D. Plann.'' ,O1 Commission September 16, 1980 Page 2 REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: .q='i XrON8L USE�PERMITNO. 7.9-`234TENTATIVETRACT NO. 10853/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 1'9 53 TabIF-d DeMMeer 3, 119-79 xN cant: AM eVreiL3gPmen To permit construction of 224 condominium units on a one-lot subdivi- sion of a 12.5 acre site located on the east side of Aolsa Chica Street approximately 700 feet south of Warner Avenue. Savoy pellavia reviewed the time frame on the project and the envir- onmental document as prescribed by State law, briefly reviewed past action by the Commission and staff, and called the Commission's atten-- t1on to a letter from a concerned citizen regarding the subject pro- posal and the draft minutes of the September 9, 1980 study session distributed for the Commission's information. Consultant Jim Crisp presented a recapitulation of the salient points S he had brought out at the study session. The consultant's findings ; are that the site contains materials that are either toxic, explosive, flammable, or carcinogenic, which means that ingestion, inhalation, or skin absorption could have chronic or acute health effects over short- term or long-term periods of time depending on the concentrations of � r hazardous materials discovered. He again described possible restoration techniques and the results of each, saying that all but total excava- tion appear infeasible and less than totally effective. Mr. Crisp . informed the Commission that an outline format of a plan for handling excavation of the site has been submitted to some of the concerned agencies which would be involved with that procedure and some of the steps established. This plan will be addressed further. Commissioner Winchell inquired if there is a feasible way to restore the site other than by excavation if it were not being considered for residential development. Mr. Crisp replied that the site had been investigated in a much broader manner than just as residential, but that there are partial restoration techniques which could provide temporary mitigation but not long-term solution. For instance, it would be very difficult to provide total encapsulation of. the materials by any available means, and seismic activity would always threaten to ' destroy the integrity of any encapsulation mechanism which might be installed. Commissioner Schumacher asked if some neutralizing agent could be used on the surface to percolate into the soil. prior to any excavation, to which Mr. Crisp replied that impervious lenses under the site would prevent penetration down to the hazardous materials; he also noted that any neutralizer which might be forcibly injected into the site would itself require removal and .the injection bores would themselves make excellent conduits into the surface aquifers. [to noted that there is a company investigating a type of volcanic ash which might be used , t . . . for this purpose, but it is in the experimental stage and its byprod- ucts are not known as yet. -2- 9-16-80 - p.C. - . {�^I;..y.�•.'`.-...«:��f �:. ,_...',... ,. 's r... ."""'_"'"'� ... ...`i. ....'.t ....-r.+.............+....4.-s..,.:.:.,...,:Y Jirirt aatr.rnw..swse+r4.s+y ...i:ti3lll,•�— Minutes, 11.13. anning Commission September 16, 180 Page 3 I � Jim Stahler, State Department: of Health Services, hazardous Materials Management Section, addressed the Commission. he said that his agency is in agreement that the best proposal available is total removal, but that a contingency plan for possible evacua- tion and a method of shutting the operation down immediately if j odors should get out of control are a necessity. i Ed Camareno of the South Coast Air Quality Management District was in the audience but had no further comments to add. +' Chairman Porter discussed the legal requirements, concluding that the Commission seemed to have no choice except to require an environmental impact report, in light of the identified odor impact which would result from excavation. fie discussed the con- { tents of such an EIR and the need for concurrence from the. applicant. Peter von Elton, legal counsel for the developer, addreased the Commission to agree to. a, continuance to Tuesday, December 16, 19801 however, after further discussion between the Commission and Mr. von Elton he indicated that he could not at this time commit to a further continuance beyond the December date in the event the EIR process was not completed by that time. lie out- lined the process by which a consultant had been selected and asked that the Commission review the actual development plans at this time t• give the applicant the benefit of its comments on, the concept. Ile noted that the willingness of Mr. Mo?a to excavate the site would be based in part on the Commission's opinion of the project itself. Chairman Porter directed that staff renotify all those persons in the area who were on the prior mailing list of the meeting in December. The meeting was opened to comments from the public. Ray Diaz, Planning Director of the City of West Covina, addressed the Commission to exprescs the position of his city on this pro- posed. excavation of the site. fie said that it had been their • intention to call for an EIR prepared and reviewed by the appro- priate agencies which would provide written certification and assurance that the toxic waste can be transferred safely and with- out hazard to the citizens of West Covina. he indicate:] that he � . would be submitting a letter to staff delineating specific areas they would like to see addressed in the EIR. John Fort, representing a group of residents in the vicinity, { urged that extreme care be taken in the clearing of the site to make sure of safety of the surroundin,` residents. He specifi- cally asked that mitigation measures address airborne particulates, gas problems and the odors which will emanate from the operation. ''p� -3- 9-16--80 - P.C. . .. .. t• •• - •.,t. ••••••••• ...1:-ra✓•w«_r.�w^+w*+.-n.u:C:::F:...e}".'A'.ili1!«"tSAf`.174(TfiFII.7':SLiA'S.:4r:�KN'r�''~ Minutes, H.B. Plann3?A) Commission September 16, 1980 Page 4 Ellen McMahan addressed the Commission to inquire why residents near the project who had been taking water from nearby wells had never . been notified of the potential danger. Jim Barnes said that it is the responsibility of the Orange County Health Department to test the water wells and inform users if there are imminent dangers to their health and safety; city staff has been in contact with the Health Department on this project. After discussion, the Commission directed staff to make further contact with orange County and ask for copies of their reports. Margaret Wilson, user of a water well on Green Street, addressed the Commission to express her concern about filtration into the water table and the possibility of airborne contamination and urge that the site be cleaned up as soon as possible. Linda Babbick informed the Commission that even when the gas gener- ated from such excavation was not at a danger level it would still affect children with asthma and allergies, the elderly, and sick persons, and that should be taken inle, consideration in the EIR. i Carcl Greenwood spoke to agree that the materials should be removed Lv t that studies should be done on the surrounding areas to see how they would be impacted. She suggested halting all building on land surrounding the site until an EIR is completed because of the possi- bility of pollutant migration. Charles Beauregard pointed out that there are food-producing fields and trees in the area which may also be contaminated, and that this j should also be addressed in the EIR. He also urged a review of the actions of past and present owners of the site. ` Dave ,Cary questioned whether the Bryant report presents a true pic- ture of the actual concentrations of hazardous materials on the site. Chuck Osterlund said that in his opinion the situation on the site can only become worse if nothing is done. He would hope that the minimal excavation process outlined by the report is implemented, excavating only a small portion at a time. Cynthia Dull suggested that the report contain information from other jurisdictions which have encountered the same or similar problems. Cathy Lambert also urged study of the surrounding areas for the . 1 possibility of methane gas explosions. Vapor studies and core studies f off the dump site should be dealt with in the EIR. An unidentified member of the audience brought up the possibility that some of the material off the site may actually have been dumped in its location instead of having migrated. lie questioned the validity of the study, saying that mercaptans were found on the ad- jacent site but none on the actual dump site, indicating that other contaminants may also have been missed in the study. -4-- 9-16-80 - P.C. ' 447 �� .1 �Mc+t.+w w. a,.,. .T+..y+.,, .�. .... ..�i^ ..,.,.�.,,..1;,. ... . ...... ., .. .......r,«......�•.,+aa•. ri..x'1.' ...., s�'.�.�"�':',;.:1::.4.�:ii !-'LYS i��..7iv�*�Llx' M J, Minutes, H.D. Plr—Sing Commission I September 16, 19. ! Page 5 Peter von Elton again spoke to inform the Commission that his firm has received unsolicited reports about persons living ill the vicinity of the site who are in poor health (including two with cancer) and who belieie their illnesses are the result of drink- ing contaminated well water and/or inhalation of particulate mstter originating from the site. Stan Cohen informed the Commission that he has been in contact with the Orange County Water District and received information that Well #l, closest to the site, had not been tested since 1970. fie also said the District had told him that wells tested in 1974 in the Bolsa Chica had showed only salt water intrusion and no toxic materials. fie said that in his opinion the EIR should, if excavation is to be permitted, address the following: How long will the excavation take; how deep and how much dirt will be re- moved; where will the dirt be dumpeu; how will it be transported, how packed, how many trucks used, and what routes will be taken; what should residents in the area do while t;ie excavation is taking place; how strong will 'he odors be, when and how will the digging be stopped if the odor becomes too great; what State agencies will be on hand during all phases of excavation; what will occur on the site in the event of rain during excavatton; ' and if fresh dirt is to b.: brought in, how much and how will it be transported. The public hearing was closed. The Commission discussed the points which had been brought up at this meeting and the information which it would like to see included in an environmental impact report. Commmissioner Winchell pointed out that the City might be left in a difficult situation if excavation were started and not completed by the develop i% Legal counsel Jim Georges said that a completion bond should be required in the event excavation is permitted, but not necessarily addressed in the EIR. Timing on an EIR was ex- tensively discussed and the consensus of the Commission was that it would be advisable to schedule a study session prior to any public hearing on the EIR to allow ample time for review. Staff was directed to schedule the actual construction project on the site for review at the Commission's first meeting in October. Staff was also directed to investigate the building taking place on the property directly north of the subject site to see if development or occupancy could be halted if the situation seems to warrant such action. j ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY GREER STAFF WAS INSTRUCTED TO PURSUE SOME METHOD TO STUDY ADJOINING. AREAS TO DETERMINE IF THE PROBLEMS AFFECTING THE 140LA SITE ALSO AFFECT OTHER SITES, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Greer, Schumacher, Sauer NOES: None ABSENT: None i ABSTAIN: bone U� -5- 9-16-80 -- P.C. II ..�.-....+r7•7•� .-- .::I7:1 .::.•:I+ intu:«r. «. . '.•i..�4� r,.n.+r�...«.�.....w.w1....t:.'i: .,�i.. A.:;;!".:'.1♦^ sir'.i�• e;y 7. Planni Commission ` Minutes, H.B. �LQ September 16, 1980 Page 6 - i ON MOTION BY SCIIUMACHER A140 SECOND BY KENEFICK THE COMMISSION, HAVING FOUND THAT CLEARING THE PROPOSED SITE 14AY HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON � THE ENVIRONMENT, REJECTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 79-59 AND CALLED FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROJECT, BY TUE FOLLOWING VOTE: RYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Greer, Schumacher, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY BANNISTER AND SECOND BY KENEFICK CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 79-23 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10853 WERE CONTINUED, WITH THE CON- CURRENCE OF THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE, TO T4E MEETING OF DECEMBER 161 1980, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: "? AYES: ' Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, porter, Greer, Schumacher, ,,�• Bauer WOES: - None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The Commission recessed at 10:15 p.m. and reconvened at 10: 25 p.r.. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-29 - APPEAL (Cont. from August 19, 1980) 82plicant and Appellant: Webb Morrow To permit a six (6) foot high wall to encroach three feet, eight inches (31811) into the required front yard setback on property loc- ated on the east end of Ragtime Circle. Savoy Bellavia informed the Commission that a request for further continuance has been received from the applicant/appellant, as well ► t�,' as a communication from an attorney re'presenting an abutting Property owner. ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY KENEFICK CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-29 (IhPPEAL) WAS CONTINUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT/A?PEL- ` LANT TO THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 16, 1900, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Greer, Schumacher, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 1 4,.t�t „ . ► -6- 9-16-80 - P.C. ,F...-fp•�'+',`.�..... ,•- ,». .�.,. ' ... ..- �^•;^l:: . .Yw.�sw:.: ...._.,.,.. .!'_... .. ..,. .........—»•»...«eewRw !i:-w+w'r.ra.+.«aarR.r+".�++aiwrrr..+. 1 • 4 �r Archaeological Resource Management Corp. September 280 1979 4L# F'1AMM DIPT. SEN-2 8 079 Archaeological Resource Assessment of a 12� Acre Parcel in the A. 0. Box 190 Huntington Brach,CA 92648 City of Huntington Beach At the request of frank Hola of the N31a Development Corporation, Theodore G. Cooley of Archaeological Resource Management Corporation (ARHC) conducted a literature and records search and archaeological inspection of a 12� acre parcel located adjacent to the east side of Bolsa Chica Street in the City of Huntington Beach. Thp property which in situated along the east bluff of the old Bolsa Chica Mesa has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources and is con- sequently known to be an archaeologically sensift-4.a area. Portions of the subject parcel have in fact been recorded as party: of two recorded sites CA-Ora-83 and CA- '' Ora•86 (subsequently revised to a single designation; CA-•Ora-83). { The literature and records snavcb revealed that previous work on or adjacent f to the property included at least three surveys and three excavations. CA-Ora-83 and CA-Ora-86 were recorded in 1964 by K. Dixon of California State University at Long'deach and H. Eberharr of California State University at Los Angeles. This survey was the first professional research conducted on the property. In 1970, a site survey was conducted by Archaeological Research, Incorporated (ARI) for Signal Landmark Properties Inc. This survey which did not technically cover the area of the subject property did however, result in the revision of the two sites recorded by nixon and Eberhart to a single number CA-Ora-83. In 1972, ARI con- ducted a survey of the entire city of Huntington Beach for the City of Huntington Reach. This survev which did cover the subject property, concured with the find- ings of the 1970 ARI survey in terms of sit" area delineations and also noted that in :he .area of the subject property, a substantial amount of disturbance due, apparently, primarily to grading bad taken place. `I 12918 Hasler Street • Garden Grove, CA 92640 • (714) 750.08%4 i y--s+^.,.�aw.-.x— ..•'=y s_.. r.t .. r't: ...+++ i,. :+r::T.. ....... . .. a..a..•,.Wd... ,,.':'.. .�.: ..:., ... i!%'t:�i~.iq:.a-i-. .:.tl�i.`�.t".Z F' • i •I In Addition to these surveys, three archaeological excavation investigations havo occured on parcels of land immediately adjacent to the subject parcel. In 1964, California State University, Lqs Angeles campus, excavated on the land Immediately to the south of the property, on what was at that time CA-Ora-86. These excavations were carried out by a field class from CSU-LA under the direc- tion of If. Eberhart. In 1973, excavations were conducted on this same property (site now designated CA-Ora-03) by ARI for Signal Landmark Properties Inc. , under the direction of T. Cooley. Ian 19769 excavations were conducted by ARI on the property .immediately to the east'of the subject property for buccella Engineering Builders under, the direction of E.G. Stickle. This site, originally part of CA- Ora-86 (83) was revised by Stickle and given a new number CA-Ora-555. Reports exist from the 1973 and 1976 ARI excavations as well as both of the 1970 and 1972 ARI surveys (see Bibliography. The field inspection which ocrured on September 24, 1979, revealed that a substantial amount of disturbance due to both recent and earlier grading activities r has taken place un the property. Still visible on the property, however, are two small areas (see Nap) of shell midden. Both of these areas appear to be badly disturbed by the earth moving activities and they may or may not represent intact (in situ) remnants of an archaeological site or sites. No artifacts were observed during the inspection, only shell and soil color delineates; the midden areas. Also noted on the property were areas of dark soil and shell which were non-midden in origin. These occurences were interpreted to be I, eirean of fill probably brought in from areas below the bluff, i.e. , old bog soils , i containing naturally deposited shell. materials. It should also ba mentioned that , there are visible on the property, remnants of several old concrete structures. One of these structures is a large storage bunker which was part of a munitions facility constrsacted during H.K.TI. 'anis building; . • now completely exposed as the result of the recent grading was previously buried. Also present and visible T.�.,^I','i 1;: .t1' ,..te:1;•-.M1,.ry, .r .»...,. •t.:,-j:.:..+._,..:is...ii~ ...n.+ e......+ i'.la^......--..�._.....�«",,,:.s'.t. .t.l'^!T. t,:•«..4l. .t:YT,Y.;.:-��li J=4:v:�.:::3.1•S` 4 ' an the property are two concrete foundations (platforms) of unknown origins. !till of these structures, expecially the storage bunker, would have required a consid-O .. erable amount of earth moving for their original emplacement. The bunker stands some 12 feet high and, as has already been mentiioned, the recent grading has been sufficient to completely re-expoan it. In summary, these activities have undoubt- ably substantially effected the potential for intact archaeological site deposits remaining on the property. . i mitigation: Due to the substantial amount of earth movement disturbance apparent on the property, It would appear that there is little likelyhood that any intact archaeo- logical alte remnants remain. Under the circumstances, it would be difficult, for example, to decide where to place 'test' units if any were to be recommended. Consequently, it is recommended that a qualified archaeologist be engaged to watch '.. r any additional grading which i� to occur in the area., where midden was observed during the current inspect-ion (see hap). The archaeologist should he invited to the: pregrade meeting and should be empowered to divert and/or temporarily delay 0 earth movement activities to allow for recovery and documentation should grading expose anything significant and/or featurrl in nature. . Bibliography: i Archaeological Research, Inc. 1 1974 Report of a Scientific Resources Survey and Inventory. Conducted for the City of Huntington Beach. Report on file at the City of Huntington Beach. Cooley, Theodore G. 1973 I?Ppnrt of Test Invrat ij;ations at CA-Ora-E3, 05 and 780. Report on file at Signal Landmark Properties Inc. , Irvine. Ro ns, Lo strr A. and Ropes' J. nesautels 1970 Aolsa Chica Archaeological Research Project: Phase I: Surface Survey and Historic Research of the Bola Chica Bay Area, California. Report on file t at Signal Landmark. Properties Inc. , Irvine. Stickle, V. Gary 0 1976 Excavations at the Harbor Bluffs Site CA-Ora-555 Located on the i}eadowlark rams Property, :I. B. California. Report on file at Buccella Eng. Builders. 1 • J 1 i If }+ ` (� r` i �` �,� ,l x '•��iX.�4 •�: i $•�4 `� f f, ^ t���`;:� �� 's ,: "+; �.�."� 1'��•' [, l�y +1'F'1�kY J� + g� ��V I[r.3,,.. .Y' 4••}� �t„ e��+ ' r ,�"• i ;� . i'1'a. J�e '�� +:a"d.;�f �L, .1� `��'�� �1g5�y�� :i n �1)St . wil lv�:'1• ,'4-.'1 :S!»rp t y� +{�'Ot 1+ F ,� tt,,a '/•!��} j. �t 'e�.;� 1•x '}t }:i 35.>;°7j � fiy }; +)C}tahv�}}�.i1 1t {,�ri"�,,y Tn;"f1Y)f ?�v.i1 t ;i i•+. .r ��' ,(i). �rS}( ;� � ,� �ti1��, �� ,, � � •i, 4ay+�e �.t'r.. � � '-�Y. 11�• �,; •. �f}'f) i. z Sa � '),.�. +v.�< + f� �a ' � �1 °i)• 1, 'S {�c4 +Zi kti tir, c } �.;• t� r Y i i . iti;.ty .1�1 y •4'. ?� 1°�?.� 1 1 n}� '�T 5 t.��t �y f•��rit yy�a ' !i 1�f (t '((+i.�t,.. t. t., t -r { z. 1 r " t�ti 7i4'i , 1 xF h4 �}.C,frti ee"�•>., >d1zJ,G+� i {! �r b� ? < � ,�1 y �,L, � �:� 5 ,'1' :�� � 1 +p �Y,�.; J'a yi�„ ') "i.` 7; s,.•'t.: ` �' 1+ .ixr,/•Jrt�'t��.4..i, 11 `„1e. al, if r 1 tR 1 ,{1a, x + � 1'f�e �Jl k�i�a �1.(�'fy 'Ab.){x'e.. �ir/ ,� �+ � .{r ��'�' �`i:t�� .,�f f }a +�j •t•.( 1;r"`V�jt',L iC�s' f Le1• S 5 t 1�x t 1,��•;.`'ei f! �j?.► 'l,,tltf•, j. {,e <�1 r i •f l fit' 1 t ii y M ^r S } (. :+r f)r �e '<+}1 J 1 `C $J r'���� aY'(''�# :� ,S F. 7�• Ijl: �+t�`i Ml };',.1� { ,t t itit}f.{.'�'! } 1 � � aot{�.i-} '.�i►, r+ ,,��d '•SrY�I .��f`t•'X}l'+: 1a :�'`{• �,�{`�i f1 , .r\►#.�t".'E'S.. �t' 1 t�" ;��'r, f.'1�'�z?"'�� ,.i'�,-��,E�`aY�i ��: }�.�{ 1,{ '. ,�r1, �, �;'S;i �.{�;.,�tt 6l''+ f i�« ^`,�rl'!;A'�� •�;rtr•';S1 C;c, � t �`S-;j.i.: �'• � r i�S �Iy } r�.�� ¢ � ����" t� ., t �+��}'�..x7'�.4 .1 ).�(�C. r •'�{ `q .4iJ + ! ! r .•� ru i �1�i�p/,�� � a .'.• + 1 � f r 3n��f t ti✓x+� iri ^l, S � S:i1a�:,�t•' J..� '2) i`,i j.•x,. 1 1�1'' 4 ,]4 1, yu4,, t Tl,�r.a.+++.• S{}�.+ +fry:, 1,'S�9 �1�}.`,i?•^+ } i'{ti'�s�»t� ,• S•�11 r�,., �:�e R I;tsi ty. �M�;} jt, t r,(t� Z�•��', ?(' �fw:.�'•� W1�r`;}�lJi��1�'F�i tt,14�•T!(i,A.l�),tr t�� C '�'rtll•���r4� r� .�iy��%ri•(� fP���.d 31w �1waf".a.."•'�! .t 4p � 0 s� , C014MENTS CALLED IN BY TELEPHONE - SMEMBER 13, 1979 3:30 p.m. IN RE: TT 10853 Mola Development tract at 0olsa Chica •and Dunbar i from Water Quality Control Board, by John xaaadjanski Tile "dump site" mentioned by Jim Barnes 1.n his communication has not bee used as a Class 3 dump- site for 30 years as stated. Tile Class 3 dump site was a recent development, within the last 12 or 15 years, Prior that, it was use for t,heserhaving a very time consid- as a receiving site for refined sludges, erable concentration of mercaptan, a highly as°atfarpartmafetwolper which is normally used to identify natural g relocate, but billion. This type of material is very difficult to before any development could occur we believe that it would be very necessary to relocate it. Basically, this has not been a Class 3 dump site -- it came in' after the other material was developed and was fairly recent, and even the Class 3 material has some decomposable rna�ethis n eit consisting of . tree t:un3:n, tree trimmings, and things o. yp r :df i n . �1 j - _. .,•,-.,..T.s..� .,-.A�... .,•.• .. �.r,.. tip.. ,'Y».!'. �;: y, -c.... t ,._._... �� -n';'e- i•LY•' -1.=. .Ls, ,"'.i �t� •i n+ 1 5..� r M �Ot I ;+i t ' �?� � t�+ { � ; �.. y K ' ' y:a ''y. ' v •a. �+ •r'1. +yi I y+ t. "� � 4. 5 �x`� �; tyx- .N •,+ ► ) .y,0♦ ►�+•�K .•Ayr 1�!, t,� + �' �. i1; t ,-t i �.i: Y• :1 S 1 wt�.tr4 ^,., ,'k- .Xi '5(;, e; (a•'i'iI'�rr'J1. '� iYt t' �••} 1's �t� 1. VJ�{ ,�Y, t�• "k � L. 7 C �� 'C ,y}} .'C� ,! +�.t tr �1�+ � {�,';�,'ti ► 7� j.t �,tr "4:,�a�l,.� y��� ;?'t45'�' '�''3 a. ��� ,�� �,.. � �. r Z'�1 t*�' e,.�?:,• ,•�i + ,,±�y (a -ptt ' }:Sn• stt4�,+YS 'r � ��, a {t �.+�1f�y . ft 7`ei ' 4' = :v�t�r `l„, fi ,N L1,� tt yy �a�, �,y '� + q' '1 a i. �,4 r 3iC 5 ?' kt 1 ;v,t {; i t•"�tp S ��.r1>1t.�1, c. �p ii,,i`�s5+.')1 'L�1 .t ,' t!1Rt,� t^I e'�Kl�;u�,�{ '''��t��J, ;.+.. .�' .n 4t♦ ++: �' g�r'R• �+fk#t{�:�y "4 'i� i:. .#':`tyl!" ti�'1,., it !'��4 � :'t x ., `� ti�,a• .�,t4�$ � tt{. )♦+�• t7�a���1�,,�j�,it}t �`" �� :, ,, � Y+j, t�) ta•��41 !� V t �•> t4.��,�'; �: + � + 7yc�..� . tt�t +_ ,A�7` ♦}if.+?� K ey, i�v ,+ ! , ` )t+� a+.�' J�+ Y1�?�,' '`}J43.7'. 1�-i �Y..t f�I.��` �' 4.; , t1 .'1 1 �' ���li$�'i13�4�.TF ♦yy,i,�,�c��`��/,f '',�i �'�„it ��l"r tti. U� 'j �fi � � ` 1 • 4•'} 4 a�+j. �� rOTJMAI h Kx''(t,•t� ]\ � (a !�. f. A. � 4 i 4�, �'a f. F' '� ' M •�d \t � ��' LJ rt 'r ,{jam '��•� t 1(1 IG 0 � • OF Q DEVELOPMENT .5ERV'CE5 + 1 1 X A� DEP ARYMENT Of PLANNING DIVISION 171:.1;;36'6271 + ©u,I.D,NV DIVISION (7 t�aSt,UN r NGTON E3pACN•GALIFOBttIIA 42848 October 4# 1979 Mr: Fred Lettice ual.ity Soy th Coast r r Management District southern Zone Road 161n '�. Ball 92 A05 Anaheim, CA Let �` 1979, 1 haveforenclosed sod pear Mr• October 3 ' soils rep the earl' our a cop $atioh pre-liminarY Beach ,Pursuant Eo a copy of the P 12 acre site located ng revi-ew went on a Avenue in Iiuntingtused as for your develop Warner This site was 224 unit condominium5treet• south of dump site. area was Chica an old resulting excavated ears. side of Ijoof the property is , a and the r approximately C Y A portion . .1E of wastes for tan) was encountered in the early dumping . ' (methylmercap ite. This uOzro� for uncontrolled material subject s utilize dracarbon waste -•nst of the A type of hY an area immedxataisturb�:. wttilc exGamits strong odors when Commission our Plann3-ng that material emits 11 he considered by contins5 of the 0 osed Project wr Thisli�hemical analY The Pr ,p 19790 eofiadditiona t. We have requested S Of at their October 16, lican levels of submissl date pending the the site by the are ax3ing concentration mitigation Sol be prepared `� substance tian and anyother + ex15tin�1 information toxicity of the additional tan potential of the mercap hazard. the ,aercap ' or dilution a health far removal awhich may Bryant measures prepared by Jai be sent chemicals vn the. site is being . analysis copy of this report ar ' lemental. chemical nested that a recommendations Th6 Stipp We haVe r q you have any comments, on the site, sac] Associates• encY• es regarding the chemicals directly to your ag 1979 ationfEiceurprior to October 12r sugnestc:d mitxgour o please contact +;�jank you For Your time and cooperation. sent to the Calif-- . incerely, also Control This letter was Quality jGtJV�C7 ornia Regional a Department of HHealth Board, the state a GountY . awes R• Barne 5e�:vi-c1es# and the Orange Department• Associate Planner i Ru.do ,'6 p � 1 'Vie.'t; � t 4 if 1' ¢��, �.. w 1!? w 'x°t" t ri ,`r ,n I�.. + 't,4 ,! ;«�� f'�!`• ',�". tR � .f�•r. ,t��5�1.. 2' r. 5,`.:i��4 't,N,'` . I /{•'/5.1� .� � - 4 •.t .ryt +pt{'E ik,/' t .I�]j 7 '' k1 ,llo }F .��•;/�i ,.. ,� \��...///'•�"" a f,s. ;s' ' , .. t }5! .G ;y p '.,*1 r :A �r3{ 'i =► �4. �yl l} ids . �, tt1 r f)1 }Y� t .:.,t1`Ig" i.r� x4 .�� 4 �. �r �' ` ";•• :,..: i, , rY;! Fj}/�`••"1 �G ,1,. {iy,\ s, r 31 i rr ,D;tst i .�t •� yx,,.� 11�] r .' ,ti �. ' 1 ryy),5 3^!ti.,ii ''�4 , , l�k'. ,�.} i�trt Ytx4 �1 V;fi t,):t t,!! y`4 1� 14 S.� �•t f t •ftt.h .t t - t }( tu.:11�; t, rt^.., r t 1 1,�'�Jj fit •.. fti t �{ 15, 1�":��rp+�t� i' i :3' x li r e •1 y,. fst}y�} {t4, 1 f{�.. t,>; j l�k i;![,'>.lt�1 ;;r���� � v r�"+ "•'.Y;".A^' .y . tr$� '�v � S{r ,� •��i .�i i :.� �, �i� j�1��P,�fi 4� �, :� �y�t�' r tr i rj !!�� ( !' ,.{� jl. !�l k`;t t '•.�. . .� � i'+,� EY� �, ��4 "4 �ri`..� •� j4 c i ��+`Y� 4;}I j'�E. 1t�'��� j�'• tk'�'k"..�`'�t �L�: ���i�1t'"S�:, ;C�.4:��;;,,�\.�r{lr L'�S•}�'tr���~r'd '{V.Il 1�`Yr•f 5�,>a Y t �.• �7j`(;." ,i.;'� '� �. r7.^y.1.tit Y,t•yty'�•�{ �.''�•tt��^'''�{r.�j:•.'s 7y .,• k � 1 *rc,�y{ t`l,_r. ,.+'.S � � y i •,-�` 1 ,SVr:d' �+t"� }} Sr �p � ,,FF "�. • �..'1't: .1j�S':�7<l k,�n, i f'� ^1f1,4 �y`�,f .l.�e�/•�,, i� ;Ytir� • ��' t ��� r }1 ta.}..>�c 'i'i ti j!,( L•. {.• � Y �:;}� '�'q4 'l,�i � ��• r rat t,ly't �• !t � t .t. �it� tJ.�\��• '� '}t ,.F;��`;i. �,, �tt.� t` a�i j 5"4: ,':et •r �t; r, `� ,rd41 '{ J7.�...1 `t t �� LS�,,. ? ai���}��t� '., i�4 j'I�y� �,���,i �,,{�,T�ty �'�'�?tft•r�?jll C'.•;.t�y�/����.111,.�;'3;.•.S.ir..}� !s�'�?',�'�+ft4' •�` t.3a.'�,,,1��}.-�>>:k..y,�`5 �l ..�{`};����� �,��,+. + pJ�t,j7F..s�. 'Ft�i ,`,�t•�r�•� wts, '.r'���;�,�t�7>' �t«i�k�"'�1.L.fa}.,w,#1F1t'.,diii�Yli.`•'ti��''��'�t �'s t��, '.c ,"•5',:.� t�,l:itrt05r► .z. y'1[ :�.Y2�`,e%j.1Lkw`f�S,.iit1 +a t" -,;si,t' �•• t•>4, R t4., / y,.k.a .ir5ts't'�} ' ` tamuNo 0. skowH Jyl. Goveme+ SATE -if CALIFORNIA—RESOURCES AGENCY -CALIFORNIA REGIO14AL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD-- :' •�'• A ANA REGION 1J INTINCATON V"CH 4 INDIANA AVLTNUMo SUITE" L0C RIVHR310M, CALIFORNIA $2506 PLANNING Drrr'T. » � pNl]NEt 17141 $64•-0130 Octnber 10, 1979 OCT I;11 a P. 0. Box lcfl Janes R. Barnes, Associate Planner Huntington Smil,CA92648 City of iluntington beach I P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 926118 Dear Mr. Barnes: This is in response to your request regarding information on a former Class III disposal site at Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. This Board's sta r' has had a lung involvement with .the Bolra Chica dump. The si..e was first brought to our attention during an investigation by the Orange County Health Department in the early 1960's because of taste and odor problems in a local water company's wells. This disposal site was suspect because refinery sludges had been disposed of in pits located at the dump, The investigation was not conclusive in determining if. removal of the polluting material could be accomplished without: adverse effects on bther ,portions of the environment because no disposal facility was available. Subsequently a Class III site was authorized in 1963. Part of the reason .for the site was to attempt to seal the surface over the refinery sludge material. to minimize rainfall amounts entering the sludge, and thus cutting down on the passage of leachate or • bases to area groundwaters. The refinery sludges were dumped at the site without permit prior to 1963. In this regard, the October 31, 1978, soils-report is in error when it states that the site was used as a Class III site for approximately 30 years. Treatment of the sludges on-site does not appear feasible, in our opinion, without causing a considerable amount of nuisance conditions to develup because of fine malodorous emanations associated with disturbing these sludges. We also point out that even if the proponent Indicated that he could remove the sludge material, there are no sites available for disposal of such materials. The nuisance problems during removal and disposal would be very serious. The soils report indicates that an "oil. sump" will be covered by a structural slab -on piles. We presume this is the refinery sludge area previously discussed. However, the plot plan submitted indicates the slab, tennis court, will be located on the north side of the site, considerably removed from the problem area. In this regard, we anticipate that unless the sludges are totally incapsulated, irrigation water will reach this material and odors could occur. J. ar ••w•..•r.•. .. ..r... •;.ct:::' ,. «...-....,v....... '•f.. gasto».rx•t.:LT:"_:'::.: . ....vn;ai.t •�t;u�T,*t•�f�• a`. e•r+!••t r .`c.. i ..w�••3+c•t;•.e-t.ra•,•t.n,..r.. .c:• ..-. .i S".r.4,'-..'f.: .. . .n�' 1 tr4-r':.r7�.. ' I All >.1°'� � +fir t,+ t+' +� �� ' gAgNk irl �' 7 �. c`r ' i �: `� 11 �" �"'1Yl: f t�L ` c`.. f ��,ity � .� .}•,#{ �t't' C �'�F�:. i,"4 � � r;�.r�},C� sv� i:�i �.h�•. Y.�t �7 'k �!,kfit' t , t� #i tJ� tit �� �`J71•r,: yj).s (i Ora$ 4 .! � tL�^ t• '1't_., r ' 1 �s f'' 1 " t 'ii F` �r�S 1Sgt ' .rv,$� '�s"� ..�..��,.,�'�T,,., {; �.!' � �t."!:�•'r rl �..t,i?,�'[S1' 'r'�' �x"1,t`• � �}• '�•, '��, t;,7 ,i r�; S Y� �,71 �� �c�: � sty'•,t�'�r`�,!{ "�'i trh 1 r1. ih,;,.t,l�r 'yt 1 s 1' t»y 1 d ,t':' 1 ' i i.y�• ' '�' �t�r: �x ya � rdL 1 � iFt,� Ttf F' {y�5q � �i YI�„A�,F•} �+P" tt#(Ik .}�:i:rw'tt t��'t•;''-i .� ��'�.��'I\�t�t•' i.� �'�,,4i�f 1 r�,t( r {1�#''',., •�^, z S.. <� .h; y v ��i1t: � �1h5� r' li'4 z }- •a S r c �: J� i a, 1 ts•�,'k t i'� a,,l,,�I�" �t z.tl,t{,f�� y'Ss•'1.`k) ' } t '".•1 «,s_ . ,YX 97�t � 4r trYii �,�,: :•t/��' yy �•.' yl �'"+j� �,, Pt�' }}'/y, .���(.y 1t: ] `/ 1!� ',�„�Y.,{W�� t( fl,i 1.,,�y4�".'� � �'•) 1 t �{{•.<1'i 1'� ''1•' •2 �",k•..�N'-t •'! .!• tG ., �'.lrl,}L'.��,��1. j«�` 'FIAT 7`. 'P�f• ilfy . .{t,r�:t!�!r:• f(� is.d l{�•� �4.5,{, ti y,'�'��' SII '�l�"�• '! l j��•M1i��111� .. 9r $ t :` f F.t• ' r, ¢ ( [ n,l• ! jt'#' t t 4 1 f !, nY. 7 }1 J� � ��`� .1�•s?t �� � 3y;y.l�dt� �,4 � .'t��, ':� , i._ .� � .���' 1� ���.�<�{{ �I -fW"n. ,.E.y # ,k iq 4.' � � �"t '� a .�,t r,.�„ ! ` ,1F ;� :.�•�{ J'". rS is R;r G� •1 `i.r s� �':�} t,".1h ;t'' Y 3' a;� �� ? ):4 s „ }:44sr� :1t'�" )'I' `� •. tJ S i �}r �t�;t y;fTt' st. 1 1a1 4q�5 c 3� ,. it ,.ti� 1 , • r � tiS a M •� s ti,,, �l}� t, .. t //s a {{ � pit' j ��+.:�r5�,t. �a. '�i6 t+ �r '�{� e" �F�` ' ti.t 4l{� 1.. •�tli. �. te�'. ri :ri �S'�R , s. ,ttek,�,,, t :�� '•1?.��"M:�:t�•� e•'j 51� Il .., � .5 ,� g�, � .� .t, t I��f3Ll1.+LL'r.kiS'�1 '� - •S •�' ���,.s .�, �Ri{I•t 1-!w .zz.��.,,,+_�1�'s��—�•,.. �ti.k..t.�1r.S.�t�St 3_ '�=�+ �*1. >,��d��r����I r.7,Yi , I ' Tames R. Parner, page 2 City. of Huntington Beach p I Wit close by stating that thil hus many clnv ironmental, concerns which require slgO11cant vi'forts to mitigate and plans for such mitigation have not been dvvel.oped, to the best of our knowledge. We will. be available to consult with the City on related water quality problems. If there are any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, John M. t•Gasadzinski Senior Engineer ,TMZ/ps IV I it�?!1'►T!t�^"t'�*'isi` r.t+.�n.Yv..r.[w.:• n,.. .... ._ ., ...t,�,.., ..t..,,•h��.�.....•....._...,.. - ..... .,. .. :yCi:L�r::�'a�;:''..nn:i� '.%r�:(li C.lt•n. �.......,w•t.�m di1r`S .��+�" �t .r ^r a. �� , .r, s'�1; .�'�.. :�.,^»�:. �,� .;., . ��� 1 ,w.l•e•.,tY•.1."MJ'r r,r++. -1.1!�p1:��1i hl .r� l�,� 'yt tivt ''•:';t.! ..^l l' ,,r.. - .. � +, f YN •t'} i 1 { ;Ly(�1'L �` � ���jak ,�±���a,�ft; J� y ;' N���j 4.•(y{ �s .��" 1� ..� � r '1!14, �+'Y 1t `` ,f R �� At7fx�E cf i�'rFA i*{d ' 7 T {� 11'1x a• y ,� `� S � � �f:Ci �t �t� 1 1� �,e i Year 1 ;�� �s,.��,.'fit''�I t' r , ,•. nt T. •�l �k' •�1'1(tii.r� t��x'?tr �'��1�,y� ,.l' � � 1•dt U�ry`y x.�, ;•'�j It f� ;t•• fit.. y 1� .}, c r }�;1. �,�j' r�'�t� �',[.�z .r.! (+"„` ,i �'4`ed 4 �l^ ;•, st.l`�";,�..:j �.l� ��d ! } ��s�YJ��.r , 1. ?t� 1 �Se(�,`i^^•.�R( �A�i) ".C� �'iiY���'�,t. tii\',�•,i' . �, rdt;�k'a"�x�';�d`r"�'tf"tJl� '�''.�r 5� 1'�1,,1F'��t� ,�4 t!�t��•F'�:j� � �'l2 i,��:'k �'f"�+�-ir'}L,iTG•' �•�''t7�`^t1:} 4"'�•` .��` }txv��'�t°.i" lP l��t�,�`4} !i: Y �A��{ '��yF�a y"ysc Srl•(t' .le.t. k,t J, � "��,� � ��,^ ! '#j l ftr , .tl � y '.d.}�{�,r ikl� ,•s�lr,!J ' ''r (is %S '�t� +'t: t }t4�1c1� 1jj R}; �i !,i. `�!' �� ' � 4 i i?i�t�'Ir t�]�. rv' '��i �� �1� �� t � �' a'i" � ita���i .1'�t r `��.`�'t lr, '►�y. i� s:� ��1;, ,tr. r 4 F�+'. j;r Y��it't ,,� kltr !.�t"`.7 ,t J�%'t' '�i" � •� r� .t�. •9` F't; �c 1rt y tt 7�t;..t' �1 4 '7s'1 !� {�•�4��.�'; + +1 f i � � !.a y��f;•�°!%�s�Y:�'. !.1 �!• [[�, K"tf.� f�J� k�� M � �' '�''l i1J,' �t.�;��r�[,,�, �.�t}i }. �� •�,�i � � }����r1 )�t .d� L><+1:.��4� 4' C �.���!;�. `a�li� �/.,.;K,� r .7?l �� �• j i yG::� t -0 t.� �,, I i �r,L" t 1 p i 'Y, J:t L�•.! I'�`b y �• { \ , S g u 1,1 A''`l (, ',;ry�t.1 tt. A k, 1" <ti{. i1 �e{'�1 .,f,f I:tN al„ YtSr..:U S:.IL�h.+'►- s, 1 i e. �� •�. S.r' 41tt�'} srt�.j`A � t'� ,ic.F�1i„Fj'Lt`: !• J.r 1�.:, :1 r?'F }� ''}�. •i:Y'St �i i ?, ,r a "'M x -a, 1 i l�a3aa � t �.C..,1�••+1++ ►i;+� .. f IR ► l�d Hai�.+ r�1 MARGARET G.ro"IER 4 Q IL,J�� 0� tt'3' Rt � OInRC70R /1 MGgTON NELSON.M.D,.MPH • HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY MtAL7MOrrICt1. 1729 W9ST 17714 SY11Lr97 $AMTA AMA.CA 92711/ TRLRf'HOMt, 7111834.1700 PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES MAILIMa 1.00119611 F.o..rox JSs SANTA AAA,CA 99101 November 20, 1979 PLANNING DEPT. I 1.1,01 0 i;t�:, Mr: James R. Barnes Associate Planner P. Or Box 19U Huntington Beach,CP,92648 City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i Subject: Cocrments# Huntington Beach Landfill Site, Tentative Tract No. 10853 Dear Mr. Barnes: I am replying to your letter to Mr. Robert Stone dated November 7, 1979 , requesting comments on the subject project. On November 61 19791 Mr. James Stabler, P.B. , Regional Administrator, and Mr. Carl T. Nelson* Waste Management Specialist, Hazardous Materials Management Section, State of California; Mr. Robert S. Stone, Director* Mr, Kenneth R. Regier, Industrial Ilygienist, Mr. j Ronald [fall, Environmental Health Specialist, and Mr. Steven Wong, Environmental Health Specialist, Division of Environmental Health) met at the Human Service$ Agency facility in Santa Ana to discuss the preliminary information you sub— nitted to this Agency for comments. In summary, the meeting discussed the contents of the preliminary report of the proposed Huntington Beach Landfill Site, Tentative Tract No. 10853. The primary concern with regard to the protection of the public was the results of the chemical analysis submitted by Jack K. Bryant and Associates) Inc. Mr. Stahler indicated that the State would ba performing an independent"analysis of soil samples to verify the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). On November 16, 1979, I was requested to attend a meeting with Mr. Stone and Mr. t Hall to prepare a response to your request. Since we had no further information of State verification of the p*esence of PCBs, it was decided to first contact Mr. Stahler and determine if their analysis had been completed. i Mr. Stahler was contacted on November 19, 1919. The independent analysis of the f` namples collected on the site by the State had not been completed. A letter from Mr. Stabler will he sent to you outlining the recommendations of the Hazardous Materials Management Section, Department of Ilealth Services, State of California. It is my understanding that this letter will outline in considerable detail the concerns of the Hazardous Materials Management Section with specific requirements regarding future actions of the City of Huntington Beach. r � w:;,''r':i' ;;ti� c s'•i rr.wr.as lr'::T.'^. ,.. ..• . , .. �,f 1 i •4 ..� l t A I7. It + •Ci" { a ''t t C i� {,KM'a! wl t +t ! + + +� r t}'�.�y{ Y +: .; A; .t `r41' •,ct` lyyy1,yy[[xx,1 4t y(4 7"+ 'ttt"5[y1q't " {( / Ih 'r+ t. . (�• J $/,/ `{� "� t� ,/ 1 S Y 5 1�w •� i +' ++a� Fi{jj„!T a+ p �(a l•Y# �1t{�t5 J.�'L#��p f { �\.• �` 11 1 �{� ,�.',�^ •1 !,+i�.i{ •,r! � 1r � 9i1 S �ii,`TF(f,.: #+{ Y.�r� •� '1 5>. { �{�,L#"1••t 111I11���rrr��'11' tl� �l �i ft i4k a�"y ' Y.;q � y.. i Fy tttt :�i 5 ]t t{Tjt�tt4F+. 1�• }y ,f�jS�� - F.15 7 � C f 'P +�i i �, ii}•YpI+C� y �� 'S) Ay +3�°j t A:C,`i„'.! t .• ,e {'�.�a �YC;f ` � `'�•: yt, 1�"���r #1 � �., r r'tir'j� t i.�, t� rT •5 '< !ij i�j� � �`•t�t x'.t '� i• '� + �,it � �� �'��fS. Y�a +i � � !. �� ,+ �.1 ,;'} !{ji+ J, lSf1 t . t .11i!'1� l yt'AN-';15�' z �,}!; Ilir�yt11u�•ajy�',y� �1 !�. �. i. L•`r•�,• . 77t,�! ,'.t ty('' vt, k.,r�l. 'n i 7S1 ry�i '^ .y f,•�;.# C!'s' €x �'xi�l+��l 1, +��[Lyi'C. tl,at f: f' ill }`�.. L•x5ti � r`� 2�• 1'!t t tw l�G• 7 i 11 t. ,(•1711 •1 =;, 1 '�ii�+1 +• �'4 2�, iti�.d ) i 1 •f� A S t r 3�.r `I � "icy ty r i {�'. f,', �� g.� � ), dl� lJs� Y•� �1♦ y S'+�' } kill'' rt T` { }tii ;�'!'•� 4 ;a .}.i„ k7 Y +' '� +' Ney X{,S.y� .t rL SKw• , `� S,ib ) 3!"+ .�4, f•' "' ''� ! i .�`: k t T! •. +'t < '7 n' .i ti7 �tr� )a 1'i t T' i;}r 1� 4. ' .i i1��r1C1 �' yt i•' r •ivy. 77 �'Y.'� t 1001 �i!)�i"r' r;i iti• li is 14� p� )' r} f�l, Y i �>l� tr,�;Z �t 4 7 ! �'4, �13��4 {� G p`a,�+ 1L \ 1. 4a,K,t. � �y, N (�.�{'ti 1'� �,. ti 1( !�,{,!`77 + •+�•�ta'�;i-7y jtr i�x i (4� 5.2. .. ppli�' y+, [},' ,` r' S;w .i:� tip' t i'.,r �}ft '.7:1.•7`f .S,`, f,•t(yt�.•pi7. . Vl ;1t Si ,A�':�- ',C� f2."t��{'+" r .15 =• ,�`(+�r 't �1''� j��l' 'S;C °•'f' i� ky ;4Y }r l�.'i ..�tt,/.+7:k#w r�, t f�ly`F�;, � .i.�+♦;j „r ��.,� .r1 y3.:��;P�tS l.lMr. .,jw ,i.l�r.1 .�j:#i 11'f:f''/� .L.�a, �«, Y.' ar„�a.'r1�f��li��.r t••2 '�?•i}f. llf A:- �i f.. .r .� f..c+ �4. ei,It�� �i'#G 1� �� �•4"•�•}1� v�.k t,y� �•�l i.i•r t. 4•i�ty;'t',�V ;7 Pc:v(' ( ?!•.� t''�! 5i+t�, ,. x7.�{.���',.•r 1,7.y '7� �.� .,1. -.rl e r .1 ��iya �'a d •)'l+ �,�°1 1 ��_�Ey.._.� .Err—.+-• � _ " � Jtl ' - "M+3'..i.:.e._x.., _._. ,_ -...� Mr. .lames R. Barnes Page 2 November 20, 1979 It is our recommendation that no land use decision should be made regarding this cite until the requirements of the Department of Health Services have been Implemented. Sincerely, Kenneth R. agler J Industrial Hygienist Division of .Environmental Health I • ICRR/lc cc: R. S. Stone ' R. Ha l 1- OR ey ' r .��:~ ..+r ....�.... rt--� C� .,t•., .I.:.ve•..r...,.,,�..awww, � � ,«.r....+w ',x tcat+r[.�wlw+rciSCW •-...�. •.._ �'�� ''"�.',�;.#i:, '. nl', ;=}:.,. .:h+.l.�:�..,t a:,.. .i�;. ,:."(' :1.': .. .,. _ 'G,Y.•....+:+7�"...`•`•.?L �v Y fir^ y �� ' +, ' 'ti�''; 11 �' ! , .c't' '; •a , 'l ,. , ', { j� r4+' li�w ;��.� t' '•� �. ,�. {k �..��,�.,, i�l'��r:1*,�c1t �t. .� i�;tr x, �l' ti '�+y�il�;� 'S �NF) + 'ft +��ti 4� � tt a• r rr/l St �,7�,, T�. +��(�' '7 �' tNl�r')11i`T9�•. � �'1�� �� +'r " `I.''`.�'�1'• ' ,v.��lg',Rt•�'�y .i�• �� t��'"ja 'rYr1t� S t�'h �. .`•'1�� i .sS. gi , {`L � •''i» y R �1?�x. 1�1 )� ,t�r4� ! '•�+_ o ).i,t�t'{r'.1S'i_t."'t,t �{i,,�j' ,,�T ,.fir,.. . 83 � �iFr,a1'}, �• . 1¢ '�'r '' `,t� a 4r, y.. k)• t}y�! ' fts, t ,r ��� R. X�;Kt:P•1. r it v� fStf�•tt y'+'?� J�'�.. � .� r: tk.: ?Y �! ".+� � )4 i �ti�i ! �•1{� ,�� C•�t�t r" `�s) �41A"r", y '��t.•; ,•, F,,1,,1.� "+})t � t ;,,} a;i+i! ,b'�: ? ti� � r:�,ki� y• � r r. •�,{� ��•� I �,xa`,c f�,� � . '�� .4 .F} _` 7.} t ( , d.fS',,t t� �43(4�k:_{ �.,}.5'!'1',� "•S 4}. r i �� ,tt kT+�T_{r. E1Y , +nl r'x^�i.lw.t ly F4t.'4^ � ! ,}Y�D�),�F:lk fYx�4�`�',,t,{A'1�� ►t�!1// `;j•.t,)!''is{,� �'�, .il, :�}'15,�t,��,�,� i� ,� ,� �i i.hl�� �.A1 ���t'i ��li. �r��F�•.d'�n�.+�ii�i �l y � r'�j tt ► tp . 'k• 1 7... .. E t]', ` .. 4 �¢r., 1 y;,�y � t 1 r YVw r y.f L ��'+; s ,.t`�.,!*S,,A �� •�i`,At���ls,f'�.��it�t �t,{�ii �`�# S. f1 �t's'?�1, ',�Jft�F4�,siY ��.51� x'� ,J,;1,�.�t } t,,,���.�`�`i yl:i'kr 11,�r�,Tt� X�{1 ,;�'+,�,b(�''t; ors t��;' w F#'.xf, � S((r& sr ' � {::45�+..Y ) fw, Hf' 1 i(� �' t3 S.t 7"�� 4IY• y ! b t 1y h xjt' f'i +ry ,J" ►` -!r' •Lf' "5(.} .'� 1'f[ y{p{t�,•,� ,}�� f�,q!.,x � t tt. i�•`•}� } �il. '�? �� tfil'Sl.�i '��t t�, i,�.11vd,' ). � 'r�i' ,'7.1 ":-y�• �•� +`f.`F � L xSil �7"�3� 1w��.�Ir•t 4• ?�'1���,N �Ya'4. �4�;if �i�;'�','J1'� �1,� • FUYU RE G 5TATE OF CAUFORNIA—HEALTH AND WELFARE Arit,4CY EDMUND G. Flowte JR,Golv:ernor r. ­t­­ '�27 ! DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 71 44 P STREET MENFO, CA 93914 G) 322-2337 November 20, 1979 Mr. James Barnes Department of Development Services I't't!'i•.�.~ ��`1 �`!1GH City of Huntington Beach NLANW1,1M DEPT. 2000 Hain Street Huntington Beach CA 92646 Np Dear Jim: P. 0• Box 190 BOLSA CH 1 CA DUMP SITE Huntington beach►Ca 92648 Thank you for your prompt action in forwarding copies of the Jack K. Bryant b Associates,. Inc. , preliminary report dated November S, 19799 our11aIng the test methodology and laboratory analysis for the subject site. As suspected, and confirmed by the Jack K. Bryant report, there are positive Indicators that the site was Indeed used for "uncontrolled Industrial dumping" for a long period of time prior to the reclassification as a Class III site in 1963. We are still waiting for the results of the-surface sam•'ie taken b ou e p y r field i staff on October 23, 1979. However, even without benefit of our laboratory . report.the Jack K. Bryant report makes it sufficiently clear that the Department must strongly recommend additional action be undertaken immediately. Our recomrlandations are as follows: 1. The final decision on the Negative Declaration should be withheld until a more comprehensive evaluation of the site can be accomplished. 2. The City Plenning Department should consider requiring a full EIR be initiated. 3. No additional material, Including clean fill, should be allowed to be deposited on the site. I` 4. No material ,. a should be disturbed or, removed from the site. S. Additional sampling should be planned based on recommendations from the � Department and other concerned agencies. 6. The proposed analytical methods should be reviewed by the Department and other concerned agencies. The Department is available to suggest a'number of qualified laboratories that could accomplish the type of analysis re- quired. . Please note: tills in no way implies the consultants' ic`oratory contractor may not be qualified to conduct the required )a!ysis; t ' '!•,•C1•.,C�y^{1...5`f..,�., .� Yh+"T�r`• '•. T'- ...».Cv.... �{.... ,..-+ .,..�. t- .,._.__ 'C,',�i.•-»,.-......y[�`V•1. L•r-i�:.ti�:vST... ,,,a...r.r.•�,wpw,.►..Tnf,M..,r=.,. 4 .{'R�) + rwi �,� ,,:.�•. iA,. } 4 �7i. •..., t� ,,i,' .,,....,•.i• :•4 ..,•,. f f• i •rv�.t ,:., i ( `t:T;ti.1 T� ,, • r y t • � e :h' � r y r'i''>f`oA S k � r ft`• v r l 7. c r r'. ..� �r : � ! 1 �. �' r'► s � :�/3 t `YItS t:7 Ti�rxk1y^� .1.+At'rl t±{ +��, j!ftiw{r� '� XK �' yjti'� Cr�,ll 1; ,t t 4;� S �� � ,ta.r`r}{ >�{s+ `�ti 1 f���k ��., �F�'••,t,♦•tl'�,.itl{ �R ����i��1;�tj���� �• ����'r4ti.'�t�t,k�ti� �1�'k � � •�.�� .j '� � �Y� �. ieRr�7,� }� 3 ! ���� y,•��• ; f `rr t� t ,, � !, i ,tp���1j,' 1.,� t, t+4 �'t� I f3J}, 6l�t` 4"419 �r�" S"" r�'�i� ,.� r'ygt 1t. " �'Y� f1 (\(5 y.��r�.5 'l -1 1y 1\ r ([.4..f[i/i?�,1 {.Y ,(3 w 4 y t,y t' +A• )k•� ,u19S I f""�,+r� �l�l t}�� .� }��.. 3• iC. !. S, '/1 }l:t t,'N,kl + {` • i"'�j 7 STY •.'r '• P�,7` r: ,71.{Y.cy 1 " ,� Y {' f.!{};jt' l�f• T t,l %'.'4, 't }y j , �.`•,+ �;}}�,�''9• 'r Ci!� 'r.�:t. �M�:'�4i�: �r �,L,• � ������ ,:���•i;�� •.�"��'��.) a !t'+y '� � •Es t � •t.� T C�t :j,(�r l• t },'` i�it���� �' f�•� �) [ �, t� It1 .4•� a rt1 1r �!y � k. r ,.,t4'r' f. r Y r ' $ 4'` 99E �'•t' 1 T t `u `��t' S 4�•� jr. � `�• r 'h � t.? � {1. ? s• k' (?1 t .' ' t. 4 c1' 3• < ggrt ,�.p1'i t�' :1rX _,,�. t l: '� xr� �. , �r ♦ NSF �" "`.t:, `1 �� ��� � ;,� 1 ,yrS�t{Y 1� 'f •} (( t,a '�r aFl� n• � t} i 1 rL,X" a. xt i•�, ; t+,s 1� �Y> �+?. ,!1 a �f�� �� �'.�!5,t�:41 7.. i:'(t{li N��Kl� t,, {L �t(�y4a 6l'��. •,.��,r :�,�'� ��4',�{,��.,r��a;} ,�,t�.'rt�r p r,4tY�,,�tt��6,e#3'',t �kf�rjF,•�j`'Y,,,'r''+ .:4 ,•. "''�'�,.� �, ^h t`}tt4'�� f°�� ����.'��yi'^�,�•�;' Ij�i���5 ' �Y'+�('�`���3'�`�i'ti¢ ��Ii�•r¢{;ti��a+ti ��t�i;1.{'� �i•+�:�,"rS"Sic�tyri�y•��.l.,.X 3�.`u-��'�Wi���.,`t •t� a' Y:Z�„�".ilY ,1;�1�:' �• :liyy~)' l!"*��' r.�!.bra�'� �},r`���' b' `?. )�. t(. ,, ,;y. h'i )4 � �.ri.a.�.+�1••rF r. ..z_ llovea)ber 20, 1979 Mr. James Barnes4 7. Fencing should be considedaround the entire periphery of the site and with suitable warning sigre posted. C 8. Because of history of uncontrolled dumping activity in the gene-al area properties. Thisuactivity be ven to shouIdsinclude*consideration of private e evaluations cn well properties. . sampling. The Department must also alert you that there are many unresolved issues that wouldneed toedsef concentrations hazardous ua ical compounds, unds, such as PCBs and seienium, are found In subsequent evaltions. We cannot overstress our concerns about the Boisa Chlca Dump Site and are planning tu review the situation with the bepartment's legal counsel to deter- mine our next course of action. Please continue to keep the Department advised of all further action being ` considered or taken on the subject site. Sincerely, e ames L. ,5tahler, Regional Administrator Hazardous Hate'rials Management Section cc: H. F. Collins, Ph.D., Chief, HMMS cc: John M. 2asadzlnski 'Senior' Engineer Robert Tousignant Santa Ana Regional Water .Office of Legal Services Quality Control ,Board Department of Health Services 6809 Indiana. Aven+ie, Suite 200 714 P Street, Room 1216 Riverside, CA 92506. Sacramento, CA 95814 Harry Seraydarian, Chief Carl ilelson Iazardous Materials Section Hazardous Materials Management Section O.S. Environmental Protection 1449 W. Temple Street Arency Los Angeles, CA 90026 215 Fremont Street Kenneth R. Regier, P.E. San Francisco, CA 94105 County of Orange David Storm, Ph.D. . Divisien of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management P. 0. 0ox 355 Section Santa Ana, CA 92702 '2151 Berkeley Way James C. Crisp, Manager Berkeley, CA 94704 Environmental Planning .pack K. Bryant & Associates Inc. 444 W. Ocean Blvd. , Suite 1400 Long Beach, CA 90802 G: •"i` _• �.�f ice.-:. T:twr wM ,7.717..:rG:'t1?r.,}::fT1 `41'- ?r i� � trr•r TNr,.�`.,. . 'j' ri•:;ilti.l� .r a. •9�-}. �f 't r{y 1�'! 1�. 1 i' �r , ntn r '1 j� ,tej(klajj•�� g r y+ , f I .we \r' >1.i •y,�n x i � + +, r F`!i" .�,i )'))►. 1 E1�F'r' .V`l �yt �•' 4`t t 3. ! �' 4 4:•'r \C Ir ' , t 1"i �"!,4 �5 '1 ' fit''1 1 t t t ( t r c�:,t S r "( •'•.tr1 �:l Orly,4 1 (�. ytl •'l'.i �Ai_ �i►•r�•' .rL� L �.� r��4-�yti,`. 't 1 ,0 ,; �y ,�;'J� ]s 7i �,.fi y c e. �+ ° ,t,�r 4r� �.'� �_. . '�!. " e�. 1r .�1. �� !��� y t�P;#t V �'t<�'�,' i1 , ��., t.>t'�• h � �♦ ! 1 ��PP t.• v.�"I� , L } � �• e \' IR r '�' e ,�Y,ire d'. r ' ,�! t i ►L., t1.Y ;:o$,.. ,,j t�^ •y �r rj., ri•�y a�a r, }, [ •t 4� t tl�( r ,+ � ;( ! �, y p 4ti, };?,. !„" , +% ti ').t": f�i 1c�tj .'i . \§ + r•, il?. "� ky '{ l t j + 1i4 �a yt. i l,tr i , t y. g�►; X t• r i`fox t�l ..a �' # �it�l +j_z D���i�i �� a �ti CA�it'y �+.. �'r �. �t r �, ��.r1`'�.{+t�+. Ft,,,t+..1 t-�6,� t � 1., f �?Sa 7 � � tt� ;, E(i ! ittC .l '�y .d.y,f..r. t �j 1��,. �tj� � t i t. 1 , r +�'� 'i�- �r '���44� tt +�,, �' Yt,t (.d :�ff r ti" ! �! !� t'�I ! f ,4�; �il'�fJ"""{1'.�f.;y;f,1( .!•1,Y<1s��, tt!?�i�.�� •t.�! ?�i�t,�t}��rfl,�. �n� ��:fdl�tth�[ {1T• �v 1t„ r ^ i"};\:"t tsi:l' t j c .j,. w •%;. r,' .f .S 1 t �j 4 rj�',.�r ri �� 1 M �Q,9 tf:� 1. dc. �,• l S r t t 1 t. i� �iy ` fii"iyt.�! ��,.€,�'�t'�.:� �'S 't�i1�.V. k'.'':itrn �.SS�� i �%��i t�ltl���14i x{,j7 "'�c•.'"•iy C yt,T• �C Aa•;t"jy ,e 'Si tl�. .�{f;}{{�..7, #i�l�i'•��', \�.3t1 � r � �" r �� , •:5 .7 . �i' f� � 1� �,� t� c,'� r.N %" Ai.% �i. r1 „' '1�'"i.•. t �,� 11 fa �,33 �(:�"r'•, 'a 4, !Lfi: j,t7�,.•};-'r YT. tf�,» i ) ,�f.�►ft ry' �� � ='t t•1�+•+ f:''�� ��41`. ►:"l, .t. ,4�. .1�49 *• • �?i.'. ti Y. �,•� �� .1'r�.'� t ." .(, .�•� t. �•,. .��'S,ir. s „ l� �Cw�, v:. r �' y t t '1��5. y.• a, f e 4�, 1 �r��k', ' t ti• +,t...r .� �a�z�a�� �"�,��'"S��Z�t•,*��• .�w,tt .�' t �'i, � �,�•��� ttli,r:•t�G:.4 f}�(,�,���t y�; 5�� rr.� �i.i�f.d ►. ; x(��`'`(t,,_d } C st�l�t��tj' r.,':�t.a�-r.," , �•.,,.,., �.;� FIGURE 7 ' South Coast AIR QUALIrt MANAGEMENT DISTRICT HEA000► RTEI1S. #1eo 1:. m^in on.. CL MONTC. CA $1731 ANAHEIM OFFICE, lose [. D^LL NO.. ANANOIM. CA 92500 (7101 991.1200 CARSON OFFICE. efe 00VLC/1 •L.. !►AC[ It. CARSON. CA 107ee . 12131 !IX•4:093 COLYCH OFFICE. algSo C00L[V On., COLTON. CA t271e 17141 41ad-s6do December 19, 1979 l I Mr. James Barnes Associate Planner City of Huntington Beach P,O.. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 ' l Huntin aton Beach Landfill Site Tentative o. 3 Developer: 'rank [Iola Dear ttr. Barnes : This 'is in response to vour ,reauest of Vlovember 28, • 1979 ' regarding the District's Position on the disposal site at - w Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. Treatment of the refinery waste on-site does not appear feasible, in our opinion, without causing; a public nuisance because of the odorous emissions that .will be associated with disturbing the refinery waste materials . Additionally, I , if the uncontrolled dumning site is excavated we suspect that the odors resulting; from the decompo-sing materials would create a public nuisance and possibly some adverse health effects . We. would strongly recommend that these disposal sites remain undisturbed unless the developer vroposes a plan to neutralize the odors as the excavation takes place.. If the developer submits such a plan we would like to review and comment on his nroposal. t '.:t.. `.n,wr .�., f,..t.r.f.«rns•.,.,. ..`. .r..w - ""'y'•._ .....•i.f^•�'�i:.:+r-:)3•:r,'�. .,. '.�,..« N :. "rJr�. �..r1wi�:,+�:r.,':r.r..,\,.►..'y�r,\'6'tt4`•:blr�/,"►.:r!7 l J;S +�' tf�r*•✓ ','+ � f. ra �f` ., i + •A' :T i .�2::, .,1 } {. t (��•4 E';�'�' � '� '_; t ` n � ,.��.« ('+.t,�, �,' ' ,`t. r, s' �: 1 t, � rt• '� ►. �• r + i'' `Yc,' .�` .i , a ,a,S f „'1 7' +.�` 1 *�' 'Y¢jf r[y r 1 yb +t ¢` `J i 1' 1 �j '�`+ c �+' � 5C�' ^•� � ! J`F. '�''{\�`�•�. +�i, "'�:�� � ! �. i'�f�•+'/L r�. � Z �� S• �1',fa. � !'�I} y 1 �''} F,. /+ 'k 1 � �^/' c� {�(. •� b� L � . �y1 •}� } ;s t� r�j�R'f X ] + ,+..n; ,� A �j ( � t,s. 5 FA �'� +, "P ti.k } F. ,!A � � y ,�, f } 5•.,t x � t`J ,: Js. 'tT j�. � }r" f.. 'h*y +. Sc 1'.Y �l'° t�}i' ' ; t +: 9'i 2 b �,t 1'F1 ' 1kYii AyR !I .4 rs, .re4` .� lr'iiit {fi' 41_f y ( yC. , h�i,,..�, ( nh 1C ,t., h y. 7 t l.� t S 1. .i t , y �- } . a •t�. �;•`c; ti�� � tr .�, ,,� .�+,. k ��,s � .� j �. ,k�• ,; �' '� ry 'tSiS, `� t6`� �'•� '}FJ`��Ir'� .:�i :! :.� '�' , " .4 ,P".1-'' ,F�•'>t� S(. � � 4 fit•1,�,.i^�.�'�}', �(�r,�.�;1s t •r�}��, `�f,3t� �-."i�,,.,S�{� ��� •i",����;�'d?�:�F ,4,x •�„It;txak.,�:Zi,, J�i�';•n�;��'S�1''Y t��v� ,s� i f .x�i��•�}� ►.,t . 1 � .t �, r>. tf'tt t+�??'`:;c.. ( 1'�(gel.+,a� fftU#fir{�1 .�f •+;�i ��1 i' j,.•.Y� k?r � Rr:. a.s 1��� 'fir f r !FFr 4'��{/'�. ,y'lri �lrjj]jFi++7i�7 5.•f ks{ ,{+ s ti`7455f't; 1.�F.'t,�s !;�}:1y�; i.i:(t,r'V�f.r�4�tY;� �(r4;"{£}�Qy�'`y{t�����?1,��CZx«'``yp���. d�vv.��! �}�(;ki`�`e-r : •F ` ,5s XL 4tf 1st. 4 �, .U� 6 4t o �.�' 'F�1\if 7;,i, 1• �rk M, i ' 6�t i� i iri .•t-,h Set„l, u• K:FSitS.t�•i+.'i4ii1t .6 '77. y, . ><( ,5,i� �{S t. .,yvil 1 s SSS+' ?�'•(^,:�� «!�"'.:++.111 �' ,�' { r �y't 1A{: ,"i� }rtr�'fj'�� ��+:iS�.. ' �. "�(• e r.:uS`.,.i t s r i �• ^ +�;1 t.�,` �.;'i.4iY't�. r T� ,��t",, i�l fi.:, •5,;s,1�+5iS, -^- ��, .f Mr. Janes Barnes -2- December 19 , 1979 � s The District has also been requested to modeling techniques whichmayovide ebenused ' oration on air for- quality mode]. g q �. to estimate the airfrom a landfill sct ite. Theted with Districtdpresently ictur waste materials from roved modeling procedure' does not have any recommended or wi roaches would how- for such area sources The following approaches ever probably be acceptable if their use is justified r the roaches are given in order of t consultant. The modeling approaches rocedures higher preference by the District. Normally the P g in the last would require more data and analysis. AREA SOURCE MODELS o PAL (Point , Area, Line) - part of the EPA UNAMAP package, available from NTIS. o RAM (Point, Area Sources) - part of the EPA UNAIIAP package , available from NTIS. o CDM and CDM QC (Climatological Dispersion Model for poinAM, area , line sources) - part of the package, available from NTIS. r o AQDM (Air Quality Dispiny. liodel for poirt,••area,rom Nline sources) - part of the. EPA UNAMAP pacicage, available fTIS.o TEM (Texas Episodic Mode!-,- for point and areasources) available from Texas Air Pollution o Hanna - Gifford Eirea, source model. asidescribedAin (SouDices- sion of Sulfur Dioxide Emis v A Gi ford aril S.R. rlanna, pp 7 - in Power Noll and I`l. Davis , Ann Arbor Generation, Ed. by R• Science Publishers, 1976 . ; (b) Simple Methods of Calculating pis ersion from ran rea ounces y anna , pr ' a�a�A a ram T S, Report No. NOAA•' 71071k06. o 1-iorkbook 'of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates , by D.B. Turner, AP-26, 1971. Availati'le from NTIS. � i ,o a • (a e }y/ r._ ..� .• ,-,-'..�.?r�;~-.•.,mow•,-� '.t.t'.':.:::. ta•..M•tr<.»:J':r•.i):,"iT`w il,_..rn:,�•.:1:;. t.:i,n!r�l."t. :+,+li;•:�t'.r'-5;.}''tis.SlCfrs _ •:.L•ns.r""'. -----••—..•.�>a..li Jrw:.. sr�[tr:. r 5 rya.' ,1 . •"r,,,...,4Sih.t i... d;+,u.'I„`.:V��r:4^ .:it'.1 '� ' -: +r .. � � ter• ,. �:fRRnt1�°t1a �• ,�;ttr 1. �lr�'ryt '1-' t�}'','1y11 (y6wt{�jl}{y i �'� •y/ (�'`, 'x�' s ��+�`(,${� t� � �yt '� �J '� t•Y +s•,�i,,,.r� FJ�1yyy��\ ,�, .F_:r+ J ��.n.l�.� + J ��{ n•' rW� i� ��}17 ii• �',�1+`5:1 fa 1 ..�.[�� y�+� L\•V .� � ��4kY'� .•�' � � � lL � �,'��!It��. �. '� A.'+ Apt"��' � � '{.� �i�7 .�`+,r;�1plr""�(''.{'(�r �.1' !t� t•F,t ``�'r af}Y<<''�51�`= `��t��! '�'.��4i`4`�'�A v',t�t.�,�,t�l�'t� ��'/�'Y.l�('1�.:�4i s~'{.,t i•, ,,r'(?.p(� pQ;I {?,\� S� ���fix+ �y� .+ t j,- IZ!(��.kSl.' '{1 � ,;Yt Yw• E �,. �i � � �',�� � eT,,�Gf3 ,, �1,,� �i• 1 1 St \ �;'1 � � ��Vi �,'.�}�' ''''f;,�i '' <<x.�'�� � : •��-E�,M+, � � %�. $j� ''�� � �;' �'` ��, � � `'4`}�"",� �}+. �.r Fk`�lh��t' �;. ••:: ���, �,�v`.1l'1 fir:';'� �:�b��`�i`'+' r�f.{ a -�.��t,. { 4 t�E s� .,fi:�'++�tF : ..�;.`El�,� �f`'4`i•S4��. ,,�; .�rl� ��'T y�. J.!, �(;�(ti rr !� :��� �. �.�« � •'�,t' �'�i,. 14 T tl' ! �,, 1•'�1;�, 7 'h' i �� 't '�r' F.4 '� ( �'+ � tx kev } i ` C �`��•r.;;.; E ti t�i}x ,� z, � y�ji}}��t �; �' �} +ct! .r}h,tt,+�'�" ,'df1j�r , r +. �r (��"Il�'tl t a' � >t t', ' r `2; r• �,•frl'`'+Y,�•�.��.t• �}; t 1! �,! r ,t •r y.. 4` '4r, 3i� c�. ':�E,., s.{t{�r.� j, }jFA+ r s!+ •�i t• ',}t{t r•#�,.,'k {; •;h >,l��i.��t' rid S�fiS t tL4 { 't5t i'F �t } r }�¢ "'{)� '1w ► � 4i h t, r �c r�i' ;V r• , t 1 S,•.'rl r' 4�• � 11 1 , 4CIA-, 4 r �,. ? t (��K y�• fj' r c;yY jFr± i � } ti r r �( !! SLi+tdt'f v '�`•i ' 4 MAY, t '` 1, r 'n: •d Sk fi, -'f•r� '���.� + 'P� tc,.Srr�'7•� t +d +i .. l j t' ,. t, ': � r c, r �y ��t ?' f�1. �Ix � Lt!••�11,T• •h '� �jy i1 "� � %�x;•st, 4' � �, .t�Y`y k.lf•rt �t r�S1 r (yr stt d k ] !� it4'4 y, 't''i{ t; ,,i ,yl A zr.1`,,({, t: {• 1 7 t 4 1. , r,. ) `� + 1 'S{; 't, 1� �`E 1�4x,i� ,�• ` 4t ..4(t t K� et i r('• /• } '+ l{+'J'.\C'.�'.1.• i, �},+ er'n,y." tit..l L•t1i.l 3 .e,+ N 1 �,A 1••'Fr t AA(I I.t�, K +�1, j ,.tr \ 111��•t .+ i V {a+ x:J.'� � i.L'j�t•-.tt4'r�i S F '"11 ,1., F``v• �i�� �tl +' `� - '•k t. k.i'��Li�: � } r k.:'w L:�X.�. A � e.i�l`-., ;,..,t•.'1��1�rSC!i1���iYr'��" Mr. James Barnes -3- Jecember 19, 1979 i 1 � Z have included some brief summary material concerning each of these references. Detailed information on these models and their use is available for examination at the District. Since air quality and health exposure standnrds are wzitten in terms of averaging times of hours to years and odor per- ceptions take place in seconds to minutes a wide range of averaging times should be considered in any modeling performed. If you-have a question please call Mr. Alan K. 5tazer, who ; is the Head of the District Modeling Section. Very truly yours, John S. Nevitt Director of Evalaution & Planning Headquarters (213) 572-6416 AKS:js r '- Enclosure :c: Jim Crisp • ,i ' r , t �tl> �t +'•s+(Ly..i, :.r'1'+-�-L-,t.-'".,j»..l^lltit c.+..i 3; .';:Td,•A'%`sa...�.,..•«•.,...w+..`q;.Ii. ,yt'irr.:�f'.r. H�'n.rC n:..:l;lwe.v'rt'i'�xit'tic' .r +ama•t r+i•♦�::•�•'•r` ,tr '.>f }r^ t.2 �S•.: t ,t r .i` 7�*, t' � .. h.� �• J�. r ,2} y� ,r .� {7 i '! r� a�Sa yn .) �i" y j ( 'r tS.i.•1 }%,1^�" ;��.� '} r�'•1j� 4pa! '�, y`7? sr' �' t � . "+ rrJi ►`e1: #� �j f '.�,�.r, 7 re ,•i � .p,l f ���•� ��y �} '}.y(, �v pa' lY�'' i S;�.',r.�:�} r ! t c. �'�p\Jf ��, � tr b�iN .a f `� la l�'fa;k t '` :1 j' am ! ,Vrt�t S• .. ' t. •�•try'►�'`- ,a y f I V. ky °! `' { ;r 7 •' tt x . '�'�t7tE} '� t2 r . :�ti'.i t Y�r 1,+ ", ,4�` t�R, .It.�yY7 <'� z'I.i «� Yt,lt�t`� �� . 1 t,' F, j+, yry.vfr3; . ik! d•. •t'#t��I' 1 ;l�'. '} R• "gtr ri3a yt,'i i ,i f�T' �, ° ,�t,k t(! •'+« + sit e I.1�., i ;t T{kw t a 5,4 r j tt ,I,i���. f (, ..;y. 4', . t t4�L Sti t 4` 7 r..�.� -Sep.^ ! 4 .t�'f + "" .y }} �. ,{ f> , . : �k �- / i2 i,,. t 3+ l ,v'4t f .� 1'.7 7' '�' t t !'"Ft (' '}t IZ< i trt• 1 }..1.i ,E = (S lij>dg1'j�; rt�•' : �,�•rk e`).3� f «tt s 1 t�: ./•,•7 E;;,n q t , 1 'a';. t, i « t, i t .+1, {� Ilt• t�adl p t i' a,{ J;t 7 �;"J f.f'kifit '!i l ar, #.} it :• ll.' i��.�!'tt:y',i!:."f.f fl. �k�� 7i+ '�jFi o`Crat ti,t.�h a '`�.Xi;k},� ��tt1 s�4"+,,�/7�t.. �..;sj��,.4 a- ��a�}}:��..,:r�.. .y (} ., ;� ,.�{•�rdt��gfy ,Iq �.«t,�t(;ay fir¢{{ ( .�-(r .,i�ti.�t ,a ,�1'1� r l�` .r. M1i'" 1+ ?vt' 11 •i t���.�'`�$t,,ry'Ur'a 7 «�FC,e CLai 1 0 t.tt `at i }r �.� Y sa'/.Y F 1• f }i1_rt 1..Y"`Y�J`ti3:i�' 1 Y i 4 f5 i�Y1.7'� ,'i� }�1 �: F f.11 { T: Yf'f •j .t+�l� { j J,,yf•. F ;� w 7.F,' (l 7 ,,�-�Sr 'j: t r, ,,,, M { `!))5s„,+,} °l « trj {d,� It r 1 J#1• '1 `t ri.it+;,t,!'a�34 "t�++��•�v,Y,!'I�ljs�� 'f�'1' IW""4'y4r.i'f� �'�' .'t'[' ^� �f' �,',',t � 6,i�t•\/�ijt�r�jS ti' "jA �l'+ FFf t•'+'s'!. ..1�4Rtjj.�Y S e i{ .th �•'k. o�'�yy„t.1 ^t' t •P.S t .�t •,r ��. r � . a .� i •j1 3}11Y4,q�r+.1 t t.�j«�',�,��.�+}'�,9-,I< '•�\`t'� "S�{kR��ft t1,t}:L .y; ,t rtli , t' 1 t (Ct'E�#!; .t;'!�i'j� ,(Yv ��••t to r i 'i 7 ''�tl. � �t. ! a. >'' +'�•4 �� ��r „t.'� n t rk. .,.t.t a a'�� t, y � yt a ,t.• ,4, 1 . E7' . 3 t�jk�1�f� ^iy+ g3.It r d'y:'ry ,��:. t$ •s t t}� ''�k�.►,' I �' ;�, .-t t"�r• �S••a"�:�'1 �. .1„��at_!-��' �F}J -Y;+ �, `i-•a"t '��,TS`• .a11.fr�t. . (y}�jilt.•,:pI X-"`S't ti, l�, .�+_ Uay�t:r�``t:r•► `" :� C� 1"•. t? ..4 r.. �tif"Y a.>t t �t.r\' '�;1. 4�F'r vlltt j�.W ��t���11`''tff . yy-((4c C.73( �� ,t��.S �; �.C� yj,',�.'St ?�-�• �} �iciLL.�LY•a►:i7.11312Lkil�li..,i� i�r �����.'✓r1SaS�'1.#l'ls' ,�a.t'�tY'�l.!"�ii4+t�t���':i.:.1�M.iy�,, iSi��.�'v•��' 2.�+.t7:.i r S1All OF CAMORNIA—RESOURCES AGENCY 1014UNO G IIROWN )R.. Gerot^ter .� "A T. �•' _ •79T'd�7:L•' --.J.��' 'L�...r sue.+�T.t'•' :71f�S7Ri.4•'IISY.t�"'�"a'.•e'ae.'r"�•t C ORNIA REGIONAL `PATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD--- •� • , S ANA REGION •. 9609 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE. ZOO nlvenstau, CALIFORNIA 492504 PHONM 17141 004-9330 ; i'..... March 26, 1980 (i•.+ l'.t 1 0 ,'+Ci-1 ' .. i Mr. Jades Barnes t'1I{ ►:': ' Planning Department City of Huntington Beach Ik. U. t.<':.. ICVU P. 0. Box 190 Iluntinelo!t 13,imdi, CA 9254,1 Huntington [leach, CA 92648 Dear Hr. Barnes: • I This will. confirm discussions on March 6, 1980, with you, James Crisp, consultant to the proponent, John Zasadzinski , and me, regarding water quality concerns at the former Bolsa Chica disposal site. Information necessary to determine the adequacy of any proposed water quality mitigation efforts is as follows: r 1. Development of a reasonable number of water hells in and around the proposed development which can be sampled and water quality determined. 2. Suitable analysis parameters shall be developed so that the effect of industrial wastes on groundwaters can be readily determined. 3. Analyses from samples taken from Item 1 wells. 4. Analyses from samples taken of the industrial wastes at the proposed development. a. Wells sampled should be plotted on a map of the area and analysis data graphed on such maps. With the above information, we will be able to specifically respond to our water quality responsibilities. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, I JAMES W. ANDERSON Executive Officer cc: James Crisp, Jack Bryant & Associates TMz:pkr ?.71.* 1t.,t, 1:,S%1:',-'.i..e,.:.-�ri.F..a.a ,..._-�,,..,,w•.a ro,,.C:i=S..`...i":.2:. =Y:�:'awn•.......w+...rr.ta+t::'i.:'Y''.::vi;..i4..i;L•=rili.?iva'.(�..i•Ar�. a1:.' •',�''l:)d4l'} tl w6" { � � ��ly�{{{ �y 1 •aa �: � �• t'�' 1' t '.�t" , r� "•y,+y{� rr ,r ,! •� L}, iy,}{ ' "' �~)-r V{�, �y t' X t'. �V + �, + n 77 ; .'Tp „� ).��� L },, aZ��'ti. •� t{t �.�• itf�1 �' t A r�,'r r' •�r�. t� 't� .{';S�t' i.�} S' � � ,k }'f ;ti' ,.�,�+,�rr�1`� 'J� ,•.1,{��,t 1 4 �7i� :�'• i{ '},"Y,�,� �'' 9� '�: �.:���rd4 ty �• �Y ,�: ; } i] iQ r`��.;�•�h,e�y� r�,�;t:!J5'• �:�+ i f Z•rsf. 3;,,,�P,; t�t;r �yIF ,f f�, 4� .I•y of. y,+� .,,,�;1} rY�� L''. '; tS ft1.r..iL.) ' r.j C"•'r 1,A����, rti� fe �_)tt;.P � Y,�ii.X!{�tattittr�fira.�Sr .. t� 1"�r"� S,t'•tyr '�it� �4't. �.tiri 9,t',� �ri• r 'F. � r1 r ('d . (/J{jg�.��•:S k r .S 14 +[ �\\ �„+'13�44 `?' 1� t , (.f�, '. [ ) :Y .?.C�,- l J� *:1'Y., r• t���r' ., , .e�?4 .fy r1 •i•rL ) yr, { rl.•1. .�,' !.rt1 � :l..;i r,{{•�t,.0 .1 �. t t ,> � r 1 ..4fr.�yf'71S'. jC '+f�S ?54j•.i.tt � At1,t,t } 1y4_r i7`"t:,X t1.f' tS4k „ t, �i}i<;t(fik'11,;iSSr� '1 .( t{ 1} r L �1+ . }t s r Eh r` c(fc{F1r'r ti z•� ,�j 11 i >;.' �•) rti„t/ � }L irl i� M�•��t..CP`C �1 wt3 t w X.isr� r .'+y�'f S t; ��' '?ti': . i{ r,..�- x k: 1 �r t' •►19A. ,z•d!'�r y 1. .7, �i. t�tfi .t' �. K' 'i 4, �EE44 �,L ,,f {� 'i r 1 �r Fit P3. fri 1 A y ` .,, !,t .y�r� .�1,! 1 r A J� �� t�3.1q y, .7.�3. 1+,}r5•;:p;�'lt.F�1 i �ii 1 .t, } i,.1}�i•.;),)(t jE .5 i...j�{{�3'h)4'^�a�A,},.�.r v. My•t'!� .Fi,, `n {';�>,t•S t�71 Ay"•��.(G� ri`i r`.r M t.��,t 1'I,4�`�., `�',°,t9 r.�4'.\ }�y .r��rl° 1 t�.t�c�i�1•,� t} Y�.r. f 1S!t,,,t��' � a .�St1.� •�'ki6,���.::1.,'l.�tp`a, t��! ...• 1;,i? •,�'rx t•cti•.a,e,.�,. {, t r�t„t.�5 y tl.� j � }t. {t r (� �: SrtF.�`. 1SFi { t,,l E}}. �?il;{rJ��. 4y �,1,V r= ` Cc =,tt ,r Y.i)� deer, ��,{ �"{ AYr.t •, .i {L },* `��r� {:4F ,s,4`,� 3 i .4 k1•f?'' ; i , t �Y��� 'r' (+, ryk•i�'• r st{ }`� yy { { � ;•34. ,i' {( f t. �'' L•L 4 j e S.r t.t!(•t: �r� {' -Nr + i �l'i t rS� •'r�.� �t �• ��! .1� 7...i _�'. ,jalt t} <<°`�'lr'r 4 t L.�v '{S�J�.ik <{ {'i = yti�r 1�r ,� 3"I'' ..�� , t:1..rr1.tW. .•+. "^ t Sty t i 3 ,i! Ct ,.:r •, fi , ! t '• r t ��s= r`f.t t L.t'ruL.+S iL ' � r r The Metropolitan Water District ()f Southern Californr'a August 18, 1980 r. I f Bolsa Chica Desalinization Switchyard Site Marcel 1435-1-9 HI.INUNCTQN BEACH N>L• G. J. Lindquist PLANNIING DEPT. Von Greek and Associates SCE' 2 ��80 t 111 south Orange Street Orang&, CA 666 P. 0. Box 190 pear Mr. Lindquist: Huntington 1,3ch,Ch 92648 prajnage Easement In accordance with a recent: telephone conversation n et, Jr. , of Metropolitan between you and Mr. Royce ti. Mitenand Division, Please be raisal Water District's Right of Way and Ldated tfay 27, 1980,. by an advised that based on an app independent appraiser, Mr. f ]and Michael P. Locker SRA, A..S.A. , the ,. permanent easement value of the strip 0 cvntaining 0�38�eacreae and appxoximately 11662 feet long, over a portion of Metropolitan' sfBoolsa rmica Desalinization switchyard Site Parcel 1435 $32,000, In addition, there will be ar charge toffacilitatefor I the use of a 50-foot-wide temporary Basemen I .. construction Of the storm drain. This temporary easement is. superimposed on the 10-foot-wide permanent easement, extending westerly an additional SQ feet, and will be for a six-month period. It should be noted that the proposed easement al areas are under an agricultural lease, and if construction if, phased during the agri�oUerral 3L,growing Le5see rhall,11bc=areimbursed � h Ac ' approxi- mately April 1 thrc ucy by Mola Dovr.10E3men Co0poration for crop damage or for nonuse by the Lessee Of tile .9Dp51/Telephone:(21�1416•,282 1111 Sunwi Ptrult•Ljid,Jos Anrrh-5,Calif./maitinr atidirss!Psi 54153.1 os At'Gele9.Calif rrt ry-,r� .,._..-.. � _.._ �..� ., _... 17}ta+>r.x'sY'7i\"[,":Jm.'3;•~.�•. ......,.�..rM-.-�..-.......�r.slrt.•..''�'e t' 4� t9'�y>�*R'r t•t>••rR err S" r{.+. ... :.r,-..:'....• , L� �� .�'1' 4)�i�.4, x i'•:... Lr., re t;%+ t tett 6f�! - ��, r,`.,.Y ,,t rir t ,r. � - Nam•. . �,r V1 r I qSi z" s t a�t`•f ! t4 1 y>h, fr ; } 1l)� I i '� 5I!" -q)Trj)i !. , +fi, �ft �. 7���� ` F•.+, t,�. i�'�,q 'd.�i ! !\t,L���� h� { I� l�"��.15 fr1�Y:'Y.��Y'� y,��Y j�r to ���C;, �, ~ �'t] t'� �.i t il+ tP •ire V ; l r.' 4, r '1 rr,� '' :. `y .r , i. �i t� �i, ii+l �,: ., MO'r J .. £ 11t ! v,, $S .?ir t i• +^1'rzt.tLr� ty ] .4 h r,r4tr a}..} ,L• J i'f' •.�.l fti�� �. 1y'�,� t�'� �'�f}.°l� ,rtr .t i' f`i�C,!''� :i{+' ��'t} r}'1�� i ;� . �r�! .1'� ��ttikv�ly�jti.,r � •t� :y�tlt } i e' F 1�e t1�, r ,T' .i1r `'^d.\�1+� t`a''�, ,r �,.1'1���y r•r, v�;,�X,,�.'S��r, '! v.,�7'i �;�. .��'' txo.t�: �! 1 ,��•.�r{,.l � r;,�: r�. �'} ,,�,,r .'�..:iM t'�.� `�7,',��` :1,.,t 1 .,f1�;1� �� i„ T•i}� !l�l c: 4 �1d. A 4t, ,'1 ti j( r t 1 r ! p� `t ir. •1',l •i �"�I lt•'� � �'. Ida �..'] •1,�� P} .Y n •f �.+t'tl.• 1Yyiiyy '�'•?•t`''� Pf # sr��t lu•� d!}�i .� �. h,i� 4 Z , ..:r.,� rly ?� r ��.•1.t i.. � 4 K •t'Sy .'�, T1 ^Rt•,�1 riz7,'�!ti 21� r <•! ,t r Y I 's a �"y` t T k2 �1 tFl. V 11�pjl,BJy Gt4 '' .(t" t�Ltij !1 y r, 'S }' {• T r r+, t: !l t'3 A/ +e 1 t !k ":{0 cl? S 1 y •r,:t�,w. ;h 7.+;;.. .,i 4"�ar}�, ( f �.,� ,;e+ ,�,� n¢l(..- F:.If:1 •� 1�'u� L�A�� r r � �•''•!•.�r�{�r. . • , '} ,:�,t. �2r,, 2 tit,l, y. rf t{�+• �r• „F�l� 41�e � `t ��P 7 �r.t�f,t , (��j .�.! r• it •1'.' t(.,f��i' k r �i,tl� Y Mtt:j},t� y. �{�. t1: r,"t .+ �Et, 11 ( q r•.. rt., t �tX rS .�lct e {;5f {} r P {[ ,4r;�. r t !• ?#��; ,1 . J�. ?l,,•;`J'' Y'• t� ; ,+,r,�{yt,I L"i.r],l�st 5+.1l`, t..j `4}.t•� a].f„�, :�' �,+r �r `' *k.,e ft"} t,Zt., t r<�t4�`:'r Jn �,t'` tv tl�( 't ..a� .", •#.}}+' r ty' +'l i t . �t y , ` e" E. {ri. ��, fit i 5�. {v f.r "�; � . i �-� ! h'•�. .� v �,, ikk 1 t+ i}�#�,.r,] ��� j �� �� ,� . '}X f 5 f�, 1 t.� °t �y r{u } { a rj r, F{5 t},,f�,� i � , r.,t f•`'•r •A ,ri� t: '.�tti.. ;.`j, l lit �l,i�•i !. (,,� i{•r, yt 11,r' �'}� ,(t,�h., �} /A1' .tYq.:� 'lli,F�i.�`± }.lt�'•.(1',tt S 4SS ) ?�e i. �.C.��,FS� � ')f.l:t t'. IYy r ., ,„ ,rt .ir { 1tJt,;�i>i j t i4t l '!: ra ,t•,, t ..f _11 Y. f �yil:f,.Yr r t ]\" ±, 1, Crr;,(r. ..:5• 1Y�,.i�L � � t._32ilYt X ,�r.�:�Lk.+t�.••,� .r f �i+l�s.a: �, 4 tt7,.s.sxW2J...i.lwi.y+l.,.•' Sri 4 1-IN 1 t ' Oe ' Th1'Mc'�ruhtlhlan Iva{er D19111rf of Suulhern Calilornia i. i Mr. G. J. Lindquist -2-- August .18, 1980 Any further processing of these easements will be held in abeyance until such time that a check in the amount of ,34, 000 fora the permanent and temporary easements is received by Metropolitan. Very truly yours, A. L. tiovanec Director Right of Way and Land Division . RHM/dsp r t ' ' �, ,,, ,?, ...z...jF ... g.. �f' `� .-yr..r ••r :j.'.Aty'ta....aet:�t'�:1ti.•r iri{` "".r"�;(f':e:.+.r•.:h*.Y.S3�'r•t"'�'_ j}ip�f•�','i�'x,r�• .tf.t'•1 W�.}; L ..!i Y.} ,•, +M,Iv+. .� � Yr tar } l t, 1t EDMUND O,IROWN JR..GOVOMOt S11.'f Of C1:I1ORN1A--HEAtfH AND WWA'-_:moo. - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES • a 2111 DERKEIEY WAY FAftf.CA 91704 I ) 540-2043 I. September 3, 1980 HUNTING rom OUCH c. PLANNING DEPT. i Hr. James R. Barnes Department of Development Services S E P d 1Q�U 2000 slain Street P.O. Box 190 P. 0. Box lot) Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Poach,CA 92648 4 Dear Jim: Due to the -teed for expediency in this matter we hat•,_. been requested by Jim Staler, Regional Administrator (Los Angeles) , Hazardous Materials Management Section, to provide you with the Department's comments on Jack K. Bryant and Associates' report on the •former Boucher Landfill. The rt•nort as a whole -appears to give a relatively comprehenaive picture of the fill in terms of its physical contents and chemical characteristics. r From on-site observations, the solids sampling and installation of gas wells were performed in a manner consistent with the requirements; of our Department. The sampling of water and gas from wells as described also appears to satisfy the requirements for• appropriate and representative sampling. The analytical methods used were consistent with those wonted out with Departmental staff prior to the investigation. o with Tammy Smith of •�.� The data as amended by a telephone conversation I y , Jack K. Bryant and Associates (8/27/80) appears to provide a relatively i comprehensive description of the chemical constituents in the fill. i This evaluation is however subject to several conditions. The concen- trations reported are approximate and subject to the limitations of sampling, analytical methodta, and instrumentation. These results only represent areas sampled and additional chemicals of interest may be present in the site but not sampled. The chemical analysis represents ' the state-of-the-art for such hazardous waste samples. The organic data f should be viewed as approximate but it does provide an indication of the magnitude of chemical contamination. Tile data generated irdicates that the black petro1L.w__- like material in the fill is indeed cinsidered n ha zarduus onste. The lead levels detected in many of the solid (samples exceeds hoth wliat may be considered back- ground t18 ppm) for the Western United States and the State's criterion . level (50 ppm) for hazardous wastes. These solids also contain many } organic compoundu of concern at significant concentrations (ppm levels) . Tile compounds of major cuncern from a public health standpoint can be grouped into several chemical classes: 1) phenols and chlorinated phenols, 2) polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAIi's) , 3) nitro aromatics, m.Y.c`..J7:'.!;•�..l.�. :�, . ,,n•�a,.w... .. „a.,er«.r.�....•...._.�....+.�.........+...«.v- 1K'. ..,.•.....:1r:� ..�—»......_..,.w.u.rrwxa V.r«gIn.L4'nxa7.ulKC.r�e:a 1.T1.^,..:n:,:li :s9'.i James R. Barnes - 2 - September 3, 1530 b) ethers (chlorinated), 5) nitrosamines, 6) thiophenes, 7) aromatic hydrocarbons, 8) chlorinated hydrocarbons. The following information and assessments of potential hazards are a result of our interpretation of the available literature and conversations with a staff toxicologist. We feel that these Are valid assessments, however they do not reflect the opinions of a qualified toxicologist or physician. Phenols ' The phenol found in highest•concentration (21 ppm) is dimethyl phenol, a compound used for preparation of coal tar disinfectants. That found in the most number of samples (9/17) is phenol which is widely used as a disinfectant and raw material for many organic synthesis. Phenol was found in concentrations up to 2.1 ppm. Ingestion of small amounts of pure phenol can cause very severe toxic effects such as nausea, vomiting, and circulatory collapse. Fatal poisoning can occur by akin absorption of the pure substance over large areas of the body. Chronic industrial ex- posure to phenol can cause regal and hepatic damage. Chlorinated phenols were reported up to 5.1 ppm in the These types of phenols are used as general herbicides and wood preservatives and can cause similar acute and chronic tcxic effects as phenol by ingeatic-t and akin absorption. r Many phenols and chlorinated phenols are known animal carcinogens and suspected human carcinogena. As a group, these compounds may be considered very toxic upon acute exposure to a aide range of concentrations. The chronic effects at low concentrations such as found in this site are not well known. PAH's Many PA11'a were detected in the solid samples. Napthalene was found most often (13/17 samples) in concentrations ranging up to 33 ppm. Anthracene or phenanthresie was found in the highest concentration at 130 ppm. Other compounds of this group that were found such as benz(a)anthracene, chrysene, and benz(a)pyrene are known animal and suspected human carcinogens. Little carcinogenicity date is available for napthalene, anthracene or phenanthrene. These typeu of compounds are associated with petroleum by-products in general and with any incomplete combustion process. The primary modes of exposure_ in this case are ingestion and inhalation of material containing PAH's. These compounds as a group do not appear to pose significant acute hazards at the concentrations found, but may pose significant hazards upon chronic exposure. W itroaromatics Nitrobenzene and 2,6.-dinitrotoluene were the only two compounds of this group detected. Both were found in 4/17 samples at a maximum of 90 ppm for the latter compound. Both compounds are used extensively in organic synthesis. Bath are notorious methemeiglobin formers in the bloodstream of Ck v'•:,r.. ,t•,r ...,Y.'-i' •�` -1: . . ...;:7:• - ...".:z'1:,a-::..a......r:.; ":v•_':i'y...•.,., :,,, .[�... �Y. i� ... .' .. : r . _n:.a:: James R. Barnes - 3 - September 31 1980 man. Such a condition results in severe inhibition of the transfer of oxygen to tissues. Acute exposure to a wide range of concentrations by inhalation or skin absorption can result in headaches, drowsiness, nausea and cyanosis. Prolonged and extensive exposure may cause liver damage and n ther tiusue damage. Little is known about chronic exposure to these compounds at the relatively low levels encountered here. These compounds vAy pose an acute exposure hazard in this case. ' Chlorinated Ethers i Two chlorinated ethers of concern were: detected in the solids, bis(2- chloroisopropyl.) ether and bis(2-chloroxy) methane. The latter was found In concentrations as high as 7.5 ppm. A related compound bis;chloromethyl) ether is a known human carcinogen. Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether has been investigated for carcinogenic properties. However, we do not have. the data to provide at this time. Oral rat toxicity studies indicate that bis(Z-chlo.oisoprupyl) ether is moderately toxic while bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane is very toxic. At the concentrations found, long term hazards are very difficult to predict. These compounds were not found In the vapor phase and may not he an acute hazard unless exposure occured the akin contact or ingestion. Nitrosamines Of the two nitrosamines found, N-nitrosodiphenyl amine is present in the highest concentration (18 ppm) in the most samples (5117 samples). It Is also a suspected carcinogen. N-nitroso di-n--propyl amine is a known animal and suspected human carcinogen. These compounds are not normally associated with petroleum and its by-products and are often used in the manufacture of plastics. Vapor hazards are known for other potent carci- nogenic nitrosamines. The boiling points of the two found are low enough to- indicate similar vapor hazard::. Exposure appears to be limited to inhalation of particulates, vapL. , and ingestion. Nitrosamines are not readily absorbed through skin. it a acute: hazard may exist and again chronic exposure at these levels are not known. Thfo2henes Little .information is available for the tetrahydro thiophene found in the solid and gas samples collected. Thiophene itself is found in coal tar, coal gas and technical benzene. It is used primarily as a solvent similar to benzene. A recommended Industrial standard does exist for thiophene (20 mg/m3 or 5.3 ppm) , but not for any tetrahydro thiophene. The maximum vapor concentrations of (thiophenes) 1.4 ppm do not exceed this limit. Various toxicological information on tetrahydro thiophene. oxidee Indicate that these compounds are moderately toxic. An acute vapor hazard may exist for this compound. Chronic hazards are unknown. These compounds appear to be the major source of the odors at the site according to the data presented. ;LA . '�' James -- September 3, 1980 ames R. Barnes 4 Aromatic Hydrocarbons pimethyl benzene wars found at the highest concentration (25 ppm) in the solids while benzene (0.1 to 4 ppm) wan found most often (12/17 samples). Benzene (0.06 to 0.2 ppm) was also detected in the vapor phase. Current toxicity data indicates that benzene is the compound of primary concern. It is a known animal and suspected human carcinogen. In rare cases it has bents suspected of causing leukemia in humans. Acute poisoning by inhalation In due to its narcotic action. Inhalation of high concen- trations may cause exhilaration followed by drowsiness, fatigue and vertigo. Other more serious effects may ensue upon exposure to higher concentratio•.•as. High concentrations of benzene in air are also irritating to mucous membrane!, and liquid bE:nzene in irritating to the skin. The chronic effects of in- haling small amounts of benzene over long periods of time are of primary concerti in this case. Such exposure may cause various changes in bone marrow, and manifest itself by headaches, dizziness, fatigue, loss of appetite, irritability, nervousness, nosebleed and other hemorrhagic symptoms. The Occupational Health and Safety Administration has conse- quently estabiished an 8-hour IVA of 10 ppm in air. harmful amounts may also be absorbed through the skin. Although levels found in the vapor phase are far below this. standard, these standards were • established for only 8-hour periods for adults. The effect of such low levels for longer r patiods of time on other segments of the population are not well established. Chlorinated it dy rocurbons Methylene chloride was found most often (5/17 samples) and the highest concentration (0.12 ppm) in the stolid samples. In the vapor phase chlarobenzene was found in the highest concentration (0.1 ppm). Methylene chloride was also found in vapors at up to 0.5 ppm. Methylene chloride is the least toxic of the chloromethanes. The acute effect is predominantly narcosis and it doer; not appear to cause significant organic injury. it is mildly irritating to the skin upon repeated exposure. T-.o levels detected in the solids and vapors are very low and do not In- dicate acute or chronic hazards. However other n;uch more toxic aliphatic chlorinated hydrocarbons such as chloroform and trichlaroethylene were detected in very small amounts. If these compounds are present in other parts of the fill which were not sampled or Analyzed, rarious, acute and chronic hazards may occur. These compounds are very commonly used industrial solvent. Chlorobenzeneis commonly used as a solvent and chemical intermediate. Little toxicity infornntion has been published, but it is known as a central nervous system depressant. Liver and kidney damage may be observed. Slight skin ;.rritotion may also he observed but toxic abno rption is not known to occur. The levels detected are far below established TLV of 75 ppm. If highs. concentrations or similar compounds exUt in parts of the fi.11 not AM uampled, the hazards tray be of greater concern. SMTAW �C;7R7•^q�.•..,�v•.,.r+.;�•-,•..•rh. .,..,• ;,r;.t. ., ,. ...i.,. . . ... fw:r.Txsa:..;ft:'•:;.';'Y'�7�'• 7"r'r..,•••r• JZ7 r'- j.' z�r('.— may; i1,.:�r t1.....,.y'M'r:a��'.. '..`:JL'hIM: �''•'` r'.•.. • Jades R. Barnes - 5 - September 3, 1980 711e above mentioned potential hazards, potential explosive hazards of methane generates, in the fill, the odor problems, as well as the oozing of the material ul, to the surface mandates an immediate witigation. effort. Considering the toxicity information mentioned above and the present and possible future modes of exposure to people in the area, we feel that the excavation alternative as proposed by the report affords the moor protection and it: the best alternative in the long run. There may be short term odor problems associated with this alternative, but we believe this can be controlled by Appropriate grading techniques and chemical treatment. Acute exposure to workers can be controlled by proper personal protective equipment. If vapor concentrations found in the gas veils are representative of the vapor content in the fill and if they approximate "worst case" conditicns, their emission during excavation will probably not pose a health hazard to residents in the surrounding community considering dilution effects and shore exposure time. We recommend further laboratory scale tests to confirm the presence and concentrations of the compounds found in the vapor phase and to determine their emission charac- teris Cics under possible field conditions. These testa will also help to determine appropriate odor control measures. F'crthe more, we recommend that a "dry run" field test be performed to determine the applicability of methods developed in -the laboratory as cell as to facilitate the management of field equipment and personnel. We also recocmtend that personal and am- r bient ai.r. monitoring be performed during excavation to pruvide sonar measure of exposure to emissions. There are many other details of implementing the excavation Which need to be addressed, however thg6:! recommendations will be made at a later time. We will he very happy ro lend our advice In developing an appropriate excavation plan. Sincerely, 4 Aft.)i Howard K. Hatayama, P.E. Waste Management Engineer Hazardous Materials Management Section r Barton P. Simmons Public Health Chemist Hazardous Materials Laboratory Section cc: 11. Collins, 1110fr- .1. .Stabler, IIHMS 1). Storm, INN R. Stephens, HHL J. Crisp, J. K. Bryant 6 ASSOC. S. Wong. grange County Health Dept. J. znzadonskl, Santa Ana Regional Water Control hoard AML A. Danzig, Sottth Coast Air Quality Management District '• (' 'S: ..u1.,'s•r.,. •<lr.i•..r..:4,....t� ,,:.. .' •!.0•.re+�t�:..t '.��.`XSL R::i:`i,....a:�."I ZLT'^';SI':�•1 4�, .�.l..tii '1:h% "?':`}'J.• !M•:t:;;i...' KL'S:j,7:,.:;St�sM MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Study Session and Tour Council Chambers -- Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1980 - 5:00 PM - TOUR COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bannister, Winched, Kenefick, Schumacher COMVISSIONERS ABSENT: Porter, Greer, Bauer At 5:00 p.m. the Planning Commission and members of the City planning staff toured the individual areas of con:rrn which are included in the pending General Plan Amendment No. 80-2. ~ 7:00 PM---. STUDY SESSION COM14ISSIO14ERS PRESENT: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Greer, Schumacher COrDIISSIONERS ABSENT: Bauer For the information of those I.-,resent, Chairman Porter outlined the format of this meeting. Staff will review information on the steps taken to date on implementation of a request for the con- struction of a 224-unit condominium Project at the southeast corner of Bolsa• Chica Street and Warner Avenue. The environmental con- cultaht for the project will make a presentation briefly summar- izing his report on the soils, groundwater, and vapor impacts due to previous chemical waste disposal on the site. Following this presentation, the Commission will review .and discuss the environ- mental implications of development of the site. Although the , public has been invited to attend, no public testimony will be taken at this meeting; all public comments will be heard at the public hearing on September 15, 1980. He also announced that rep-. resentatives of the South Coast Air Quality Management-. District, the State Department of Health Services, and the City of West Covina are present at this meeting. Mr. Porte.: asked that if t'.i i members of the public in attendance at the meeting have questions which ariso out of the discussion here tonight they put those in writing an-1 submit them to staf:: to enable responses to be presented at th'a public hearing. Savoy sellavia introduced Tammy Smith and James Crisp, from Jack �;.r ;, •'� K. Bryant & Associates, consultants; Ed Camareno of the South Coast Air Quality Management District; and Howard Hvtayama of the State Department of Health Services. ? �Qp 91 �11_ ...�.;., 'a�,t,� .,t{� <f, "T •a..ax.v - �:i.: ,-.•.a.np.•++[Y•`:1:."',. 1 '�• •(t',y;t...t;.y:.,•�i'..«iy•l�;a'..,.,t t>:�'FT�•"•�1 > '1. t I 1 Page ?. ^ dim Barnes reviewed the history of City actions in regard to the pro- posal, which consist of coordinating the preparation of the envir- onmental information; extensive consultation with the applicant, the consultant, and other concerned public agencies regarding the existence of potentially hazardous waste materials onsite; and the dissemination of notices of this meeting and the public hearing to be held on September 16th to residents of a wide area surrounding the dump site. James Crisp, consultant, outlined the primary objectives in the re- port, which were to detert,tine what materials exist onsite, address the environmental impacts associated with those materials, and assess the feasibility of alternate methods of dealing with those impacts and effecting site restoration. He presented slides to illustrate the past history gleaned from all available testing end reports from 1927 to the pr:sent, stating that the first substantial evidence of pollu- tion was found in 1947. The consultant had worked with concerned city, county, and state agencies to set up the methodology for sampling the site, using core holes and vapor wells with soil sampling done at two-foot intervals in every instance. The vapor wells were drilled directly into the contaminated material and probably present a, "worst case" picture of gas generation. A duplicate set of samples was taken and archived with the State Department of Health services for verification of accuracy. In the assessment of environmental impacts, Mr. Crisp informed the Commission that 1.06 different soil compounds had been identified, 38 of which are on the EPA's "priority pollutant" list. Forty-three vapors or vapor compounds were identified from samples taken from. the vapor wells, B of which are "priority pollutants." He discussed at length the particular chemicals and gases identified on the site which, in sufficient concentrations, might result in severe -health hazards in either acute or chronic stages, or which might prove to be wither. carcinogenic or explosive. He also stated that there al- ways remains the possibility that other toxic materials could be i found in areas, which were not sampled or analyzed; however, - he iden- tified the highest concentration levels found on the site and noted that offsite migration warrants immediate mitigation. In his discussion of effects on groundwater and possible migration 9 P g of contaminants into the aquifers, Mr. Crisp said that all wells tested had been from the highest elevated producing aquifer. The s tests were to determine if leachate is being generated on the site, j if const:2tuents identified onsite could also be found offsite, and to establish whether or not the materials were .indeed from the project area by looking at: the geohydrology and groundwater chemistry. He described the history^al movement of the groundwater in the alpha ,.; aquifer as being a movement inland; however, the groundwater table has had a tendency to rise in the past year or two and this rise in . � level might reverse the gradient so that the groundwater will move z'"`=�:;,,; toward the ocean, possibly surfacing somewhere in the nolsa Chica, although this is not known for certain. He noted that existing .,.groundwater level in sone places is within 10 feet of the buried mat- •�� ? erial.ss; and a raised level may bring the toxic materials into direct ontac ''with groundwater. It was the opinion of the soils engineer •atl""•rnsYrns+•�xr.s,-... -n.vc .... _ _ 101 _ . tk .. ...,.• AIµ n -,6• .:.?7 i�.Y':..t... tr� - NI Page 3 that the site has the potential of generating 77,000 cubic feet of leachate per year and that the materials have leached through the perched aquifers and have trade their way into the alpha aqui- fer. This coulA result in a long-term, adverse impact upon the groundwater quality in the area. Restoration techniques Were next discussed by Mr. Crisp. Alter- . natives locked at were soil flushing, detoxification, micro- biological oa;ganisms, gas barriers and migration control, grouting, conversion to inert materials, thermo processing, and excavation. He discussed the advantages and drawbacks of each alt:ernativo and described meetings held- among City staff and the staff of other concerned county and state agencies, the consultants, and the developer from which the consensus had emerged that excavation would be the best alternative for final solution of the problem. fie told the Commission, however, that after this consensus had been reached the South Coast Air Quality Management District ,►as indicated that it could not endorse that alternative because of release of contaminants into the air and that the City of West Covina has gone on record as opposing the transport of the haz- ardous materials into the Class I landfill site in that community. Mr. Crisp pointed out that one of the primary concerns of both SCAQMD and the City of West Covina was the odor problem which would result from excavation, and noted that an odor impact will result under any of the alternative methods of site restoration. Mr. Crimp then described various means by Which the odor impact could be lessened during excavation: The grading plan would be formulated to grade from the outside of the site towards the cen- ter, with grading done by phases so that only a small work face would be Exposed at any one time and clean, fresh fill put in immediatel;,t once each location had been excavated; a monitoring ,program overseen by State agencies would be set up; odor mitigating (. agents would be used, with special attention paid to possible I synergistic effects to avoid creation of chlorine gas; onsite worker safe::y precautions would be, taken; a public information program would in initiated so that residents would know what is taking place; contact would be implemented between workers and air quality monitors and continual contact maintained with the Police Department so that immediate remedial action could be taken in case unexpected hazards are encountered; and an evacuation ,• plan formulated as contingency back-up if necessary. He conceded ' that further work on the above mitigation measures remains to be done, but added that he would hope to be able to have a complete elan assembled in about 30 days. l :'. Howard Hatayama, State Department; of-Health fiervices representa- tive, addressed the Commission in regard to the vapor wells and the potentially toxic materials which might be released. He noted that the wells placed directly into the contaminated material. might represent. a "worst case" situation and if that is the case relatively low concentrations of contaminants might be expected during site ;5 excavation. fie recommended further testing, but added that the low contamination level and the relatively static air condition in the vapor wells compared .with what may be expected at the surface in terms of air movement make his organization feel the chances of , : p1. Rage 4 serious acute exposure to persons in the area are very low. Mr. Hatayama, in response to questions from the Commission, discussed the Class I type facility in West Covina, describing it as licensed to handle a wide variety of toxic, corrosive, and hazardous materials. fie added that in his opinion material is accepted at that site which may be more hazardous than the material generated from the site under discussion. Ed Camarano of the South Coast Air Quality Management District in- formed the Commission that Section 41700 of the State Health and Safety Code prohibits emissions of air contaminants that m::aht pose health hazards to the community in general and also prohibits an odor nuisance. He stated that most of the regulations which his agency enforces are regulations for which there is a provision for variance under certain circumstances; however, this is one regula- tion for which there is not such a provision. That is the reason, he added, that his agency finds itself in the situation where it cannot concur with the proposal to excavate the site becaupe it is believed that there will be an odor nuisance resulting. The Planning Commission discussed the problem and the Bryant report. Included in this discussion were consideration of what had previously oczurred on an adjacent tract when materials which may have migrated From the dump were encountered; the actual depth and location of the aquifer in which presently producing water wells are located; how r the already harmful cAfsite effects might be alleviated; wind currents in the area and how far emissions might be carried by them; nature of the gases which could be expected to be released (lighter or heavier than air) j distances of schaol.s fr6m the site and the potential im- pacts on school children; quantity of new fill which would be required; and how ultimate disposal of the materials will be carried out and the effects of that disposal on the transit corridors, air: quality, the community of West Covina, and residents of Huntington Beach and surrounding communities. i Commissioner Winchell inquired of Mr. Camerenv if there were any Y State recosimendationo for Further study, to which he replied that the report is rather complete and he would have nothing to suggest in re- gard to further testing. His agency felt that the phasing proposed for excavation would be appropriate and that they would be concerned- with more close examination of neutralizing or masking agents to avoid .1armful synergistic effects. He informed the Commission that his agency had anticipated that the City might consider excavation as being the best overall approach to the problem and, if the City does choose that route, they would wish to continue working in close cooperation to make sure that the best quality mitigation measures possible are implemented. Legal counsel Jim Georges Explained the environmental regulations applicable to the project and the deadline which pertains to this AM environmental determination. lie read pertinent sections of the CEQA :,f'°Y�t�t ,• ; guidelines, explaining the "permissive" as opposed to the. "obliga- tory" wording in the determination for requiring an environmental i impact, report. Since the deadline for processing an ExR is ap�ember 20, 1900, a problem is posed which can only be overcome t fQ. !X ?I,fly�•?,, ,• "' r/_ CA- �w l '.'A•plr.weN•rt • ..-. w. • . .'i•.G..�\1.•.....+..•+.+.--. r.w.www•....•,'N'IR. .......S S I:•.1,:. rww-.. .... _ ' .+ 5 i 1 t . ` Page 5 too) through the applicant's consent for an extension of time, which is allowed for by Section 21151.5 of the Public Resources Code in the case of compelling circumstances. He set out the following alternative actions which the Commission can take at this point: 1) Denial of the project with resubmittal by the applicant to avoid automatic approval because of failure by the City to take action within the prescribed time limit; 2) Determine to require an EIR with the consent of the applicant for the necessary exten� sion of time; or 3) Decide the negative declaration is adequate with the knowledge that the odor problem cannot be mitigated no matter what is none (this action should be taken only with the knowledge that court action may be filed which potentially could compel an EIR on the project) . Further review of the impacts of excavation ir, regard to vapor and odor problems, transit corridor impacts, and offsite effects of mirrrating contaminants followed. The Commission also discussed extenoively the legal aspects related to the State Health and E Safety Code sections and the environmental regulations. ` Mr. Crisp responded briefly to the Commission discussion, saying r that in his opinion the conditions onsite call for immediate t mitigation because the sludges and liquids exist in such quantity ! that the heavy overburden is forcing them to the south and east where they may come up against natural ground and be forced •to the r surface. He noted that the other alternatives besides excavation offer only temporary mitigation and that any solution which is not totally effective in removing the sources of the contamination in ' not in his mind an acceptable solution. Chairman Porter again reminded member; of the public to submit . their comments or questions in written form for the 'Commission's consideration at its public hearing on September 16, 1950. The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. t James W. Palin, Secretary Marcus M. Porter, Cha rman Commission approval action not required; minutes are in book for information only, per Senior Planner S. Bella,-ia :df r% r j„ Oq . .•� :i:,:ihi _ .;Y, a 15.:•.^:'Z,.'::,::r.' ......t.. ..:7.i:.�r•+,�;s''"•'*7tniw; r::O1::rT.7T1ymlRr'w:- Y , d f 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 9Z648 i OFFICE:OF THE CITY CLERK January 21 , 1981 - Dianne Fort I7192 Greenleaf Lane Huntington 2earh, California 92649 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held January 19, 1981 denied the appeal which you have filed to the Planning Commission's approval of CUP 179-23 and CIR #60-5 in conjunc- tion with Tentative Tract #10853. If you have any questions, please call the Development Service^s Oepartment - 536-5271. }} t 4; Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk 1 AMW:r.B:is i r tr kPhon.:7146362271 , '"„•.+•N1r.•y.iilr�.ia w.' ...rr�•{i.•,..."i.. 'lrrvr ...... - .ram�i`wi.`.• �:.::... . .:1::. :c.a+nw+.--...,w,a.•.i'1L�yY.:'re+�,..www.w........_..._.,.,..—. .l• �i . V I i MM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/808ADAMSAVE HUNTINGTON BEACH.CAI IF m,tisR 1(714)&W25V 6994 EL CAMV0 REAL SUITE 211.CAPLS8AL1.4;;;•r M/(714)438-1157 January 19, 1981 Huntington Beach City Council ~ City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Appeal to the City Council from the Planning Commission Decision on December 16, 1980 Approving Conditional Use Fermit 79-23, Tenative Tract 10853 and Adoption and Approval of Environmental Impact Report 80-5 Dear Honorable Council. Members : Due to an emergency in my family requiring my presence back east, I will not be able to attend the January 19, 1981 Council Meeting to respond to the Appeal of Mrs. Diane Forte to the three above-referenced matters. I would like to submit this letter and the attached letter from Mr. James Crisp as a partial response by Mola Development Corporation which I would like included in the records. My first comment is that Mrs. Forte only addresses the unacceptablility of the Environmental Impact Report and therefore, the -Appeal is deficient as to the approval of Tenative Tract 10853 and the approval of Conditional Use Permit 79-23. For this reason alone 3t would appear that the only matter legitimately before the Council for con- sideration is the question of the acceptability of the Environmental Impact Report. Mr. Crisp adequately addresses the concerns of 'Mrs. Forte in the. attached January 12, 1981 letter. The Huntington Beach Planning Commission had a wealth of reliable and expert information before it in the unanimously approving all three items that are being appealed from. The .decision of the Planning Commission was well thought- out and can be legitimately supported by the facts and evidence presented to it. r�rTrrircT�.� DrY.c:rr DEPT. Al 1991 P. 0. Box 190 Hotington Beach,CA 92648 tra7 CCMuCIlSlfiri 1M tf �.ry..s.�,... te •..... ...., _. -..... -':a:a:.+ _...-_. ._...-.,.2-:.t.. :,.. - „ ..�.^r+..W».-....r.*,e::rri`:1�»:'S:y. y.+-....1.r.,.-....._...�.t.f. ....-rt . r • Y Huntington Beach City Council City of Huntington Beach Honorable Council Members January 19, 1981 Pale Two The Appellant has drawn certain improper assumgt.•ions not based on the evidence when she states in her Appeal 'there is no doubt that the EIR is tainted with applicants prospective and point of view". The burden is on Appellant to demonstrate that the action of the Planning Commission was clearly. without merit and she has failed to meet that burden. ' The EIR in question was prepared by an engineering firm on an • approved list furnished by the Huntington Beach Planning Department. In almost all situations where: entities from the private sector are directed to prepare an EIR it is paid for y that entity even though the lead agency might technically be the party in whose name the document is prepared. ?n vicw of the fact that the developer always pays for the Environmental Impact Report to follow the Appellants reasoning any consulting engineering firm would not be 'independent" and therefore every ]EIR repared for any given situation would be inadequate. This in obviously not the rase. Mr. Crisp has adequately addressed the question of air monitoring. In the event Air Quality for some reason does not, or cannot:, ' monitor the site during excavation State Health has agreed to undertake this responsibility. If State Health does-not monitor then obviously the developer will monitor the site as directed by the lead agency. A further comment to Mrs. Forte' s claim of inadequacy of the monitoring plats, and her right to review any proposed plan, is that the public hearings over the last year and more have generated information which has in fact led to the very extensive conditions of approval and procedures set out in the EIR and to be prepared by the Fire Department, Civil Defense Agencies and other responsible entities. + The Civil Defense Department of the Fire Department is in fact presently working on a very detailed and comprehensive evacuation plan in the event it is necessary. It is obvious that this plan will incorporate a means for educating the public and implementing the plan if necessary. The Appellant in her conclusiona:ry remarks would lead this ' Council to believe that the approvals to date have been prepared in a very off hand and inadequate manner. I believe Mr. Crisp j has very adequately addressed this point by :indicating that over 100 concerned agencies were furnished copies of the EIR for comment and advice. The only person out of all of the responsible agencies co appeal this decision is Mrs . Forte who has not demonstrated her credential to this Council as an expert. ' `a I Huntington Beach City Council City 'of Huntington Beach Honorable Council Members January 19, 1981 Page Three _ In summation, the question of the bond was adequately covered by the Planning Commission and the obtainability of the same carefully discussed to the end that no bond was required. We respectfully respect that the Council uphold .the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the Appeal. I( Respectfully Submiked, f 141f i ! t Peter E. von Elton, � General Council PEvE/lk t f 1 , { 1". f t '_*-.. "s:, a.;�.,,J`..... ^ *an�. .7::{:., .. '.l...w.w-,., w....f1l...:.!:�::;t:,:C•�5,::;,s,^.`:..I:.eC'd�.. 7�.izhN�'t`•�•i.,`•J.. CITY, OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION L,4-- Hlr(TIAGiDN 91KH f To Jeri Chenelle From James R. Barris Administrative Analyst Sr. Associate Planner Subject RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS REGARDING Date MOLA PROJECT January 13, 1981 t i At the January 5, 1981 City Council meeting, Daniel Matthews spoke before the Council representing a number of residents living in the vicinity of the abandoned chemical dump site near, Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. Mr- Matthews expressed several questions and concerns regarding the pro- posal by the Mola Development Corporation to excavate hazardous wastes on the site. The' Planning Commission on December 1 15 1980 a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract applicationtsofors development of a . condominium project on the site. The appli- cations were approved subject to several conditions which implement a plan to mitigate potential adverse impacts which could result during excavation of the site. An appeal of the Planning Commission's action has been scheduled for hearing ` before the City Council on January 19, 1981. { Pursuant to -your request;answers to the questions asked by Mr. Matthews at the January 5 Council meeting are stated below; I. Since City, Ccunty, State, and possibly Federal agencies have been involved to date, who really is the' cognitant: agency to monitor excavation and "call the shots', some question or circumstance arises.? if Answcx: . The 'State Department of Health Services, Hazardous Materials Management Section, has indicated to both City staff and the Planning Commission that personnel from their agency will bn present at the site on a continuous basis during excavation of hazardous wastes. The State Department of Health Services till T .�have full authority over field activities during excavation of the site. ! 2. Are there any conflicts between agency codes or objectives? ►` , �^» Answer The City of Huntington Beach, California Regional Water Quality f Control Board, State Department of Health Services, Orange I' ..[tom... .. .. _. ,..• ..., r--♦a: ,: - ,.:,1`..iv.,.w.cr.a ._... _. ....-+...........�,.-...�........_,. I +•t.."+i;41�. A A All t ^," " rr• T,.'""° �i�r lnr'�'a t e.'"�y r 1 S'lSer3' ! )c"#�. YFrf{-'i,+•y�:`l`� . �,. r^„ -.T„,.{.....t,y ,,f t �„« �, t{.., }.g♦r ;?l?"}+ r1.r s r x - F 3 A 7 ..."s7 +t,,�,7 • i' t i�'+t1,i-• il:. :,::}i , �t ,t +`t'� i..\tirt?'.'ijY�' 1.; }` + k °Y;' t.. .'�t +�A•��'.�:::t��;�YSi� t,t 't'�,j�. �i. :i.vl ^it��' a+y�,,,tty!,t: .,t. ';���jLr{.:tt,:"�.:h•�it'1'�t}'♦:.V.,i.'' � ' 1 �'4t�:�.a` ,l t.{°•:7 at�..t, +r .:� � rj(-y � ,� � r F� 1�'�f.a r t t ! 4 i �'t ���' � tal'},1'4 }t :,� e ,. ,. t � '� f�•;', t a: >.�1 It'y�'• ,k,; 6t's14 ..h wa�t'r;, �C1 A',sa'e..;s \' slr tE .► 1'ct!�sit ti't{ .4' �7t � aa { k 1, ,i!i ,, t tft ,1iLrt +tt. ti twl .ia >> � � i f. R. i V l.ak :, r:�t f; 7.,r .1'.r{•Yjk }rK +' , 4 x b� ;•�. A;::t 4Y,.' ..x.r.. tt1'•}+. {', }Z.i�, ,ram,'tF ,^ ` +I�` �'iV:,�,.. • }V „t, •ttit 'fit c�; .; f.�., r,` � , �ti ' },5.+ f: ,,+ t `,•sl,v i V4. .4 �j Z:, a •1 L} 1 �t,L'�t£, ,Yr ,{ ,.>�' r .li1d •, �.: �•Za,ttt a �`t�f k4i ], r .,,.t ,�.0 .+�a���, rt..;{ �i1t�`!:�'S�t.� M1 ° 1.1. .�i i}H�a ;y' T lye`' M'S„� �tla1'�{ „�' ;}r^'y r. u. .� ; R. h^, #t } c; .:1 _.1 y t., i y a + r r.t- F� �{i�I- '}'•: ,•1 y. +s,.f .,.+S,..C- c ,�l;V, -+�•l�� ».{t;^':+ t :,1 f' iS�� ,;1 5:'r#, n.. ltt� 5 r Yt, {��{ tr'# 4 i ''yv'(r`.. .� .,F k`.^ r;..�+! :.et F, t l�.x•�F�` t �:,,, �l,M1,, !r,1�! 1 ,I �C 11t sr,,�'. 1 wi !,{ � F•,5, ,;art T.�# .•�{.+rj�!^];1 �t a t.y`t�'.t�z'..,.� t ::. r+A 5 Vr'�,,} �,.r.;.,, i.l.rt ,�':1:�^ 3t!�, ' f P� �,,; �\ l' 7, A ( °t. `� E +•t.ila t }l X Y 1 t5;• � •.{;!� �2 �'�l�` .i q+. �.� ,1`^p� S , •[ �,r{1, .i ,a; ♦ iy t•:.�t>L G3;*' '� Y ik r ..�, '} . i i �!`J ♦ +t �>ti. 1tr } h} . 'k� 4 A,:l. sr r fSw1t 3A� +�i� A , 1'�} �- } ,:y,� r� ,:.A ''( .''.A'/ {• 17' 1 ,r ! ,t� r:i�. 14S i ,, {<it,t ti ��:�R.t`;Sr- t:.'1:'''�•!! 'G•�+jj` �,. ;ri1v� V�"`e j'.41{�".`s.; {'t• ,�,F..ZI''$$,ie't ��l�i�...t±.,{ #'t4i.a..� �At, 4,E:1.;{I/�`. �� :,,(•r �i{� t.���f[ �'p���'�7. on.rr? ?�t+�t'`. t�• +',� �' +a�` � � ,p� ,�, ,:�# •s 1• 1t LT, d'4 s � y+ ,t �.q ;+ F .� E > 1�.�``(+.t.. .�:'a 1't�xs_C_::,31_i'. y i' it j�; , � � {}},..,� S �• ♦.. l�fii t {,�l'�'1+ V i:^ m ,v, 7 I t r+i �� t i_ r.;�'r,._1 �v� i} t�'« AA 'Al�i � �ry1' y 45+•;Y: ,x w tS,,•$ l..A+it ni:4�r rre{ �sr:v�,#'\rt,t.,l4 � R,.�(. r M Page Two County Health Department and South Coast Air Quality Manageman 1 District are the agencies which have had primary responsibility in determining the course of action which was ultimately recommended to the Planning Commission. The South Coast Air Quality Management District in a letter to the City (dated August 25, 1980) and through verbal testimony to the Planning Commission has stated that gases and odovs released during excavation of the site could violate sections of their rules and regulations. Any violations which occur could result in the issuance of a Notice of Violation to the developer indi- cating that he is subject to a misdemeanor offense and that a criminal complaint will be filed in court. 3. The Planning Department Staff Report is not explicit.as to which agency takes, monitors, and tests air samples. Who are the test results reported to and at what frequency? Who rings the bell if there is a problem? Any. The South Coast Air Quality Management District originally offered to provide equipment to conduct air quality monitoring at the site with the agreement that the State, Depairtment of ; Health Services would provide technicians .to operate the equipment, however, at the December 16, 1980 Planning Commissi ` meeting, the South Coast Air Quality Management District state' r that they do not have the necessary funds to provide either . equipment or personnel for air quality monitoring. The � State Department of Health Services has agreed to supply the �. equipment and personnel. A specific air quality -monitoring r plan is presently being developed indicating the type of equipment, location of equipment, responsibilities of personnel operating the equipment, etc. for conducting air quality monitoring at the site. This plan w�i.11 be available at .the January 19, 1981 City Council meeting. Pursuant to .Condition #14 of the Conditional Use Permit, . the specific air quality monitoring plan will have to be submitted to and approved by 1!'" the Planning Commission prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project. Section 9.0 of final EIR 80-5 has specific procedures (attached) for assuring off-sate safety in the unlikely event that safety limits are approached or exceeded j as a result of emissions generated during excavation of the site. Pursuant to Condition No. 17 of the Conditional Use Permit, these procedures will be incorporated into the specific air quality monitoring plan which is presently being developed. t- 4. Hari a dump site formally accepted Mola's proposal for receiving the contaminated soil? Answer:_ It is the. staff's understanding that Mola is presently y negotia�.Gg ' with the BKK Land Fill in West Covina to dispose of hazardous materials at their facility. Pursuant to Condition No. 14 of the Conditional Use Permit, prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, Mola will have to submit a contract to the tt0...1:,1�';!' 1�, lY, , .t' .. - ... ...... --.+,...iw... , , ... .. ... .. ., .«.. .....w.•w t.. ..• •'r.::'r, ,n,....7 . ...... ..., . .. i •' ✓ .,i`L:TN - 1 , G a r 4 Y 'y. .�• � t klyiSr i�i'ygul t ;LKSyr�H..+ !!l!lSC I'�� 55( M t. Y ' + � � {+ •,t tS � � t } ' •T. .� At At ff mlllillg� 16�t'/�l�4F�9i' 4• .rs irr4 tt7,t + ,w ''`'' , 'Jr,';i i,s a y r. }' { k++1 t:• a. i si' a t ti ' ' �F(rdtt: �4' � •y5��•mr; ,?',�T"1`'�"j•(�*7+i7;,+" �', t t p ,�.r, .s ! AY ,`. ! '! S}:, �'`1�. +Y, /�,.•1kta:tl y. , ���, t ,y,� ,t fI!,i'}c :.�lry t:t�Y.l pS d'( � }. t, :1 :�. t G' 3' a i k t r,1 '�!3 !k � (S.'5.1 ,t t J 4 .,'(`n L•- ! t �'{ � y.``rr A t; t,', ,.,.. �* '' .4, r�. {.��:, ,yy m�i,'tS�1,Y`Ift,;�« i:�/' �} {' l:'t'x+!�+.,j,��ti by �,a.�p�C Y�Y •i �, '�{• Rf 1 `�, ?,?}r f i�: ?w SF ) S,i p �.• Yj .� 'M � e{� iT ,\, ,`i,hy� �'� t `,4 .l, 1 }. �S }!t. { ,�! Y ��e i+!,�ai 3ltYi'dr r' �-,. i,�t-SY,{. �..t �j :r tt177 t IS��''•1 .. .:'�"i`I 7f l4 � 1 !;k• t'! "t•, '} •.�„ . ,t }r." 1,i., y 11 cr '"t'Y' .�. .\ � �i,•�':JtZr t.:'� �: tit )i "+ 3,•:t,�'�a ";1:•{;�, f 1 rr a. '+t ,:t t i,. ; �.. `�.• .� `i ttr ` ., i g ,t. d, 8. ]� "1 a Y1 .�, f:4 9.. 1 y}�' � :,� `t ,1.� { y �; r �. ..;�c .i•,1 t� r ;Y`+ 't�tt�f r.i,.f;•, S� !f^t�'fii.\ ,;'^t3. � 1)1. 1 `'� 3�Y:q}��i� kd ti t1. `k �\r3. 1. � t + �+if-1 !Y 9} �i•'ji .f l. l,i)i�t?�F Yt �.�l S. �. IL,. t,�, �i � !}., lZr• � ,� r ,� >,,,���.! .4 t,,y;.,.i }. �` ( i..,s„�i'1 r:ti �,a, ,'� t 11 ✓•� 1•t` �[ f 4 •'v t 1 .Y, G,,. � t �,` *t I'1, ti,,. �, 't lL 4 ,,:� t�:r, ,..'t .;� }! � +.�r,f .^t 7 3 i � S is is n, •) t, r'�L, 'i ri t f +'�•;1' ,�1S�'d:l�+:...i �i�, F '{ ,1 {t7�,( "4 ii, 1t ( :tJ�lt c , [?iiJ1L`r• t Y; l. .{t i i i• M i'{ ri,! `Z .,ft '+� ,, ,�� 4 ,�'t.�t4{��::r*,�ti;l{�q„ ,r i..�s•�i_�a?"� � it 3�^��� �. ;� �s:? A•ti' s { S ( ( 4 �. ♦ ^+ 4 i "1 t/ Y r C t}ty, .4�t 1• .w . ,-..jS {� ,; 44 , r. y .1iAA .�y �.., ,.';ti N � ' 4. ; 2Y.}..Y ,$•�i *. �Y. ��f �' l 1 ?t i„'�4^ a l t,.!• rr ;2 ui'�'� .`( 53 aJ",�},•. tl �`�ii.,.,{ ,t� Yt, ;4,'•{ 'i' � t.t;c.!.`t` 7r y,,..,: ••{1 '1i4 ,1(,�. 9 ,,it,.l, � � . 1.'4 !�, -1 - tr d, .r}�F� r: y �;. ' �;..��y�+ 3:,Y ti.,.'4 qq,Jc.+* .�3t.i i s ..� ,'a t 1 ,.;1,.35�' n, < t' Y d�`A t"�3•k,:r: .•t 4,.� l` "1 ��`1 R';"�; f"'-}�".`�e� ��.t•.� r• ? ,� �..y �.tt .'��a'r�F�,i,7i ' }r �� ( 7,Y r'f�.il Jt P.. ,1� S 47 , 1, ..}�:^� .� +' ,�,SW ; t`r'fi� l�• f Y .i V`_,r 7 ,I. �r`c'✓ ts,,t ��1. �. ,YC-� L� �i��":•.,4 '�a.• ,t�;- ,'t u ?' t ! '.tb ;. t': ,;.� x •Y, f ) t 7 Siy1y Y f.^,..t fY,l1y},t. .. tr � 'ltli„ '. ..,. •r. t S.i. ry "tt 1+'.:1;. �.,..`: , �h.� a• ,� � y „ t i. t t, lL Y �1' '",�s r ), Y t S it�t,.,.5.�16.1...' i1} .t. ,v3,...,.t4„� [:�'� . 14;F•J t, lti�,.et:�,;.4;r+1.Yr.s�: t.:i�S,t,''tt' ^r �� tt...... 1ti..f � I ;}A i!'4'IA.,t•l ..r,:.,ti• ,. .. .tl. �1,`._,t .ai�'"4u�`- i .�t��.�Yl.J�`I'�'t e1': • • t • r• t 1 1 I . P 4 f I i '• a_ '1.f 4. �t �r r• 4Vs, •,l .. 4µµtyy`•�yr. • 73�'1��7;; f� k , r .tr. 'atiti"r 4�v s•'. 'di• + 71 .•c } rJ�+ t+ 5•'t 7 i��.rt i c+ ��'h' � a+ p �, ..�. �Itir�a{+�kr 7 i ,• ,.+ T r y •r +i t 4G r l S t ,, ar f}. ;�,,' ,<+ yyy�frn•, :. , 4 >iyK r.+ 14 '� t +',,y ;f.j `.1 .r t'ri t , :, ;�,i r� ,` �tr ,�"", � r .s� ,, ` � 5 r"r ly+i,,� 'i;•�'.t ,'��YI'r. .,,5,'h i�h,`g1 4'�,;,}'l�r�,+7,���.�ti '•, �\� r., y y +. >,�,{ .F,f7r,. � ,':` ,`�,�• �. ��� � t �, r, + ,a.. +r+`. � -Li `f'.. r•k .� ♦:r .,�/`+r,. 7 ra. ;111 Air ,yt r "a � t. ��`t';1 .'ti.-. ++'r,i't �.,}k D 1.'}•. . * 4 r` !'' f 1 ,( ty.;',1 t r, ..i 1,,. �r fi;{'�i A ''4.r'. � + l ti•1 P 7i r t + t t k �.� a Ca.{` ! 4 . t P.. \�, nr.�;��, t ':4 :5'.. •►_ _} ;,t 4 �- � ,�' i 4 .,,y 4�• .. +ir+(.'- 1 ��h- ,-;�< + tii,}.A�} w {,'�Sf 5`.' ..4t +: rt�.. �11 {Ar,h 'S , ti` lfi. t If ♦ �k + �+ J y, ` .,,; y 1, `�.-,', � %�. r +�„ fa „y 4 .. .�"X.,r54,k!"�ii,y 4� 'V�: �i.^h+.h� 1.++ � � t ,•{t F ,��.��1 khdtrp ti. �: �, r. .ey 9 j1 a ! A:• y�{a ;t,r.a�.+." w y' ,S�y L: r o'i �t..i,Y`'}}t,� ia �:r:: Ih- h,,'`� •�v yy 1 �,{�) � •,{rMaY -'-"r��t �«'1.a, r1° at; ��� ws.�+:d+ + �7 t_.r, r , r'�+ h'ui Ekr Y"r, ,Vq• .�,i fi� +•.;" 4t; C r�2y•., �' I.r '}w���• .l ul t� �< ti�.7 . 'f� �` � - � a }gyp t rr:�,. �1 � c � � 1',' , i. t 'y}i� ,��' � , Kw + a 3 1 r � r.Ju 7.�•";sY t rr r{'; �•p,ry i,v t y .i i,• +� *ks + f� 1 V.4+ � r r* ti � � �._� kl r, s h•� rt N '� �r � ,, �' '� !' �, rr +�� � K.ti f 4 d c.� 1 4 t a +�r}+�, Xzl, 1 ,� �•� '4 M 1 �^'�1 � 'l A r�,��,k r �,�}. ;4' }t Y jiei'' V'§,�1a_,: y ��;�.+Y,( yK } K,,�y /' ,�,j`,{+,•t��iC�.-,*�1 �,� lhJ�1.� y1'14,;,1+,� ,�('�'. {" +f;�,�,F if < ���.�• !) �i �h 'AS, 5+� ww.�,, �� < '�r4i >. i Sa�r'K 1� '"'.1 �,(1 r d'� �r •�S ,,y" �,tid� 1 ','�+► ��x�. �1�{ t r., tl,7r� �kr "V..��h� �'�i f'� �^, +V.y4 � � f e �.�-f'�G'�' � �t� �'�;•r ti 9' Y 1 r �k(i � r r ,' �,,+ a►:�`4���yy+:�{E S � {"',,4X�t�]�e�r 4` t+�+4r�r�.� e`+'�� 1 �� r c{�,�,�� 4 t K"(�1+��;4�y,a y 7{y,�'R ��i �C•k�,�{�4 *.� �,:�,tJ c�� � �,� i4 4r •@7��g4�h� 7� d 5 .��' +� � { �'t� 'i•' " j �'.�-,._. fi.:M, �. i a � ,�� ! {1. 4 r s 1 �h�h•C+ �`�.F i ��M A�.�ld. ti_'�]'f,,.: 1 v ,i � t fl ,+• 'S t ti , a " f" S kti � +,w e y +"� '4 1 �'; �� v r / 4 r ♦ f �w�, � �h �F�yf�k � � � ti�'�k ; �'�Ir� „ir•` + r{ H1 T'F L , 3, 7 �',, rd,, 1 p r r ,7�;11 fc.r + �F ,i1 � • � �t� 1 i� + N � i a'PLL 4•�i. * 'i{. {,', ,� �r .wn 1 # � �., � +w � ��td� t fi,y �in; � A +�+� �� �y�* r � M'hY � �• (+ adr +.. �� h'�1� �+� �`�� OF' -/ `r"S�M -r6�'t�, 'r ��'�',r1�~` r` � + �, ��``•.1 i 'L� t 4 � r��� � {'�►1,w r4 � •'i n!Y*Ik'i4A J n v.1,#�{ r X. �X ��`.i" ,,�• �'�$gg� -� � � t t�r�k�.�rt t�..','�a! r, C, �L•; r , t �i },�, tr t t.wf� 9����"+v �5�� ° r ��iV ?' F,�n `x�+ `.,�.Ir:.:,`r.�.r��k�/�rjt-�j��it :,5�fi�.twr ��� '}� iy' k9 � 4kQ '��i�• ,Y� SSr�.':•,.r, �.' �i�A�ty�'F, .,� i,'���*��J ,�*'�� �',�•' � sxl. � S-•�14�'i ".�K..Ir,lr:e:;.l�l.'r r a. , tc },�:,�i-, +1,y,'a 7k, q 'r ,t�b i' h 1 ti l�:o s , �'- r w.5- 4 r'► f`, r 1, , v ..•, '1'i 4lp, 5+; t i the investigators for symptoms of exposure or physio- logical changes from the baseline indicating exposure to ��. toxic substances. For comparison purposes, the follow--*ir-N examination should cover the same test included in the baseline examination. �'•yj Unscheduled examinations would cake place when an 111-- ; mess, accident, or known exposure to toxic substances ' occurs. These examinations may also revepl symptoms of possible exposure to toxic substances. d. Prinr to entering the site area all appropriate employees of the Contractor should be issued a personal emergency card based on the medical examination. The emergency card should be carried by the employee at any time the r person is on the site. Duplicates of the cards should be i carried by the Contractor. :+ The exact nature of the card would be determined by the Contractor in consultation with the Health Safety Spa- i Team. The card may include: ci.�list T Y x - Blood type. Allergies. , (.unrest medical treatment/illnesses. Special problems (contact lenses, diabetes, Cardin ? vascular ailments).. Emergency telephone numbers. , The name of appropriate physician(a). � 1 - Na a and contact for the Health Safety Specialist Teats. + e. Two nearby hospitals have been informed of the operation l ;r and potential emergencies and will be reiuformed prior to the baginning of operations. + 3. Air monitoring_ �roam for off-site safety: }� � m�.rrf�uwrr•w�+..r .. r.r&r S� ' a. A complete monitoring program gill be established to assure that air quality will be within established stwi- dards at the project boundary. Equipment will be pro- vided by SCAQM Technicians will be provided by State o Health Services, H.N.M.S. Records of air contaminant levels will be maintained. by State parsonnal. a b. Should the monitoring program indicate that certain j safety limits (as determined by SCAQMD and State: Health) are being approached, the following measures would be f implemented: 1) State personnel would notify the Field Engineer and grading foreman of the "yellow" condition. 2) The Field Engineer would immediately alert the Fire Dispatcher via walkie talkie ant then aacertain t �• -155- f'-.a:�"s�.e..r.. „ „ ^1: .,•.t' ..- .. ....- .._.. ........_. "^'.•. �..- .. .r:<..n.•....-.���.,........••ts{.{:, '..... ,...•t...'....�i;:iT^yy r+I�'•-4w�;.....t.t L.f.'.L'�. r . , t f whether ar not to apply additional neutralizing ? agents (if applicable ) and/or reduce the area of exposure. y i ! ce Should the monitoring program indicate that air quality in reaching the safety limit, the following measures would be implemented: ! • .I 1) State personnel would notify the Field Engineer any grading foreman of the "red" condition. N` ' 2) The Field Engineer would notify the Fire Dispatcher or Fire Department personnel on-site and would issue ' an order to remove equipment from the work area. �+ �! 3) Once cleared, the immediate work area (i.e. face) . would be covered by three inches of clean fill. j td 41 Work would remain stopped urit-.il a "green" condition E was declared. ' d. Should the :monitoring program indicate that air quality is exceeding the uafaty 11nit, the following measures 11 will be implemented: t; 1) State personnel would notify the Field Engineer and grading contractor of the continued "red" condition and "emergency" status and request the emergency ' evacuation of adjacent homeowners. tj !! 2) The Field Engineer would immediately notify the Fire Dispatcher or the Division Chief on-site and the Fire Department's Emergency Command and Control r Center will be activated according to the existing i. Fire Department Operation Plan 4, on file with the City of Huntington Beach. The plan was designed to f P 8 � i handle leaks and spills involving chemical and/or hazardous materials and is applicable to the pro- ,n posed project. 4. Evacuation plan: t!E a. Introduction: • On October 7, 1480, JKBA and .Tits Barnes of the City • Planning Department met with representatives of Lhe Fire, Police and Civil Defense Departments, which are the key I;r City agencies responsible for any emergency procedures with respect to the project site. The objective of tha pq , meeting was to receive input for the Plan of H:.tigation Outline and for a preliminary evacuation plan. If the ' proposed project is approved, the Civil Defense Depart- v ment will prepare a detailed Evacuation Plan and the Fire Department will hold a comprehensive meeting with the !� above parties as well ao key representatives of Red ; t Cross, hospital(s) in the area, the Salvation Army, and �• . ' possibly the School District and the Parks and Recreation , -156- 4 71 a e99. ,y l���4�� ,• "1 ,.fir + .� �� Y �w 1��1 v�v�f �,wwewv [��rf �rO in ��L=M L'� M '. nW'�sfTr A�ii'i'�vrrtrr.t�t'tfAts�1�-a tifen��y7 �� 'c ►T^' •e•++e••a+•• ew••• 4...w.y,... ,'o = `.�..,•'•.Ire.}rlwa-t�+!•+�I`.."•*{.t*•++��st'•'1'�"I{.'"r�,�.r+ •' .,",�"'*r.'S+'j'""'rl ° �....r.1►' "'j'""....T",1 .�1"' '^"T`'-'p,"�.,,'� 1.`' .1�•`•1•e^'�' ; r y �p+u �,: �i 1Y-t pA. 4-�-!.j '• I if I - c�. 1 St ',f k ,� a is'Z{� 1' ' in ti4�a't tx , i a i S. .� S -j '� } � • t ;_ S••li !'• I r� �p � # 1t :e p t rt, t} tr 1'( tad �''a p( ! :• '. `" "r► . a ,+ zit r r f �t 1 1 t 4 4 r.� , y43 , t e. It i t tl 1' {y t tY i , { (r 1 5 I 1 1tttt t..'!. + tI 1 � '1 •.1 �!'� u ,'��''+ i`y'. {~- 1t1 r�.kt �1 r�'y }�`I. `�St4 tl�r x��r' �"' '��j111' . . � 1 ,` `S/'"! t ;r I�. 1�. t�1 St.•�('ell�L� "r \ �rTt'`�•{/ r� �y'w• 1 ,.. .. `{. .. 1 .4 i:, -}� ..,•z.�1 a•7��'. ,, .. ... ,.,. ..'�i�, A....,€. .._..rI3. .1'�" r,�', •} t.,;ttY., 1 t/.e 1,►'t.c ,.ih•K .t .i ENGINEERING AND -- ENV1110NMEN1AL CONSl11.7ANTS January 1.2, 1981 Mr. Peter E. von Elten Executive Vice President and General Counsel *cola Development Corporation .908 Adams Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92548 Dear Mr. von Elten: This letter was prepared in response to your request for information concerning our position an the January 3 appeal of EIR 80-5. The appeal letter contains five general areas of concern. however, within each area are several issues which deserve further response on our part. Our position concerning the issues raised is as follows: Ia. Unreasonable risk. As you are aware, the program established necessitated full coor- dination with responsible agencies. We worked with each of the primary responsible agencies to establish a methodology designed to provide them with the type data necessary for theca to make a decision. Numerous meetings Were held to establish these method- ologies. All meetings and analysis are documented in the Environ- mental Msessment, Environmental Impact Report, and Agency public records. Based on the final available data the responsible agen- cies feel that the site can be restored in a mannr.r which assures the health and safety of adjacent residents. lb. Airborne toxic gases and particulate matter could reach dangerous levels, even to the point of requiring evacuation. An EIR addressing a project of this nature must analyze. the project from tuo perspectives: 1) to estimate anticipated concentrations and. 2) potential worst case conditions. The example ,sited in the appeal letter referenced the worst cage which, although considered possible, is highly unlikely to occur since the estimated likely concentrations show that the emissions should be well within aplili- cable standards. 1c. Is a serious threat and vastly outweighs the ndvantage to the City. A potential health hazard is there; however, if the excavation can be completed safely as previously stated there are two tremendous advantages to be accured: 1) the long term health and safety of adjacent residents can be as3ured to the maximunt extent possible and 2) a significant negative economic impact can be avoided since the site and surrounding areas would not be subject to SD 2370. Other repeatedly mentioned alternatives (i.e., encapsulation) would be subject to the provil=ions of this Act. JACK K. BRYANT h ASSOCIATES, INC. 444 West Ocean Blvd,Suite 1400.long Beach.CA DO= • 1213,437.414E e...1.�a«r.i;.a-. ..:.J.�.3S.::i.t.•...r-`.•v..w. -....,v _:vi.... ..rr.... ......»........-n,rF':.r'A•la. ....:T.1�.'�.t'�v.:.y—.7 .'a•i + }iilrf z?;it4. + TAN Qr 5 A,f �1 ?� +n^r-� «nrr ,s�.••• ...r.•aw.. �'^* w.-wr^�,r c r a„+r � .t • ^t'", d"^'S :'1'k'�'C' -r.,.-,..1.z.... «,t + f.• � } 1 >'.e a....t ."� ry,l •i.r t 1 � z ? 3 t tti'� a �ertl �f � d f a zt�,. ti ( 11 .,l`E tyi fdX t r ,at..+t+ !1f w `Sf }Lt.' dF .(� , �; x ; y+" rS r i% t 1 tt '1 tztri L ;tt , j� s, .i t:t4 +r � r t .�� .a +! i� � y 1l:1 .1 ) k '., { i ` , �� F r f } r}. ;• � .: r 11 ( � � !.r1, �� . r itt r� l{�r�}# . 7,7 1r � ,tr.} r t 4� t r tr�l 1 r i r• a C 7't_ � ti t,tA Mr. Peter E. von Liten January 12, 1961 Page Two Id. Mitigation measures do not reduce such threats to an acceptable level. This is a comment and does not require a response. However, I do believe she is more specific later in the report (i.e. , air quality monitoring, evacuation). I mould like to sny that. the mitigation measures outlined in the plan of action border on being excessive from both the technical and economic perspectives. 2. Conflict of interest, presented proposed plan of development for applicant, tainted with a_pp icant's perspective, pnd _the MR should have been prepared by an independent enSineering firm. There was no conflict of interest involved with URA's contract with Mola Development. First of all, as you know, JKBA was never hired nor did we work on the proposed plan of development. Our only role in this project was to assess the environmental setting, impacts and mitigation measures, which is consistent with our area of expertise (i.e. , environmental planning and environmental engi- neering). Our selection to do the Environmental Assessment was made at a meeting held in the City of 1untington Beach. Not only did the City and applicant attend, but State health, County Health, Water District, Regional Water quality Control Board, and South Coast Air quality Management District. Not only did they approve i of our selection as the environmental consultant, but agreed to coordinate the methodologies and analysis sufficient to provide them with the specific data they required to make n proper deci- sion. Documentation of every neeting is included in the public record. At the September meeting referenced, JKBA presented an analysis of existing conditions, impacts and alternative restoration techniques available. The City of Huntington Beach requested that those agencies involved, including ourselves, reach a consensus as,,tOthe most desirable restoration technique prior to the hearing. If we were an advocate it was because we were recommending, the chosen alternative (i.e. , controlled excavation). We trade this recommen- datiou with the support of every agency involved. As you recall, :cola Development did not favor this form of alternative at that time. Later the City and applicant requested that we prepare the EIR. The Planning Commission directed that the preferred method of restoration be the subject of this EIR. From the very beginning the EIR was coordinated with the respon- sible agencies to assure objectivity. According to JKBA standard procedures the City always received written materials and/or data prior to your review. Since the City is the lead Agency on this HIR, this measure assured incorporation of their independent JACK K. HRYAN t lip ASSOCCIAI F.S. INC. 4•14 wzst ocean Blvd,5ujte t-100,Lang Beach.GA 9OW2 • 2t3,437.414© •j �y�.'+e�'rv.r ^`.�^.',iT� :h':a2kX7.' 1'r'S.��'r.L`.. . .. .. ...».. .«......,,.. . .' ... - .a.;a..... . ,.., ':'.' - . : :' ... .. n Tr.. Nil Kit Rye ` 4 kt 4 •.. t ��� .,...1.,..r.,.,,,.,r.. -r4-^" n rr"-...i. rr- {•r -+ .rn�ptt.*y ••t""' �( �j•tV• p�'';i 'X�i+`r� tr .+: ..,.a..'�y`a'� "9 SS T" a i;'.C"4""�,...�.��.,.�,.. "� ?'�'� to 4 yt l 44 Sir► `. tj _ r �� rrr 7 r".Z ..���t 1 . � J> 214,';:�'':;�,��� '" ,5 l •� �� }��4 Fir ". [ ,X 1� ,1 f1 ay J J s t"4l�} aTt a i Stt "1 �� ��V. t� t1 7 w i L� �17J(ff 14 lylC t 7 L�i4z � a. �� 1� 5 t t y ,t S. 1 }, . } ; i1 S4'..' }r �{� �.•t 1t,�'.),� `'«s4l1 ;7�' �1,411t� . q�lt t` .},:t$ 111 j 4. 11i4,�tf +,}SI .' tit}It ,`1 11�� 1 r. �i t�•� #3 ,s�'i .� 141:.i, ``1 1" i 1 1l t t / "S.{. t f Y ,.t.a i � ;. "5 ,}� '4 ,•, r;� t / �1. t ,/` t a.. 1•,. 1� t�' �, 1 .t.�.� 1 t 4 t f�. �� �-t ".rA t - �� -'� 11 Ix' !c }.;•y� 1( •r >fF , [ � t.. 7 ,.. 11+: s4 f. , 'r, t t � b ; �1'1 I�ly�t "1:.=41. ,:y a ..fr��./E is t''1 "fit l =��; � t •�7 T��,�� 1. r�•S14.S 4 0 i ..It ',_7v1�1�• ; v t4i\.ttr x�r 1' , i:t , �i � �i I >1t �'��: rl, �� 1y1,� 1,�}�,�14"�ie'jn-t� '1Ci�i '� 1 .. ..... ; ;'�' ...tft�-:. tyl� lj :y+•t.,'S, -.�,il, 4r.1�1�ay .! :�g't.. .r.Yt,t,...?"!'.s_.,1�Itf k.-.�'1<,: Mr. Peter 9. van Ven January 12, 1981. Page Three judgment as required by law. Objectivity was also assured by the public review process. Well over 100 copies of the EIR were sent out for review by Federal, State, County agencies, as well as City departments concerned with this project. The document review was , conducted by persons with expertise and/or interest in the specific t. areas of the project (i.e., hazardous waste, air quality, hydrology, etc.). Their cotmtents in no way indicate a bias on our part. To the contrary, the report was call received at every level of government. As you are aware, JKBA is a respected firm in this field and has been involved in the planning, design, and physical implementation of the majority of the: alternative restoration techniques analyzed. Due to the amount of coordination involved and at the request of the City the recommended restoration technique was to be chosen on a consensus basis by the primary participants involved (i.e., State ` Health, County Health, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District, consultant, ;. applicant, and City). A consensus was reached during a meeting held at City Hall. The minutes for this meeting are in the public record. 3a. Inadequacy of air quality monitoring. The EIR indicated that the air quality monitoring plan was to be completed to the satisfaction of the responsible agencies involved (i.e. , State health an-1 SCAQMD). Due to the expense in setting up 1 l.. the air quality monitoring plan we decided to nelay until the ►'i. ' project was approved. Since this appeal, however, we have started E :I to prepare Vhis plan and hope to have it available for. the City Council hearing January 19. 3b. Agencies responsible for st-At measurement were understaffed and ` . underbudgeted to do the—if ►fJ During a meeting held at City Hall, SCAQPID offered to provide the equipment to do the monitoring if State Health provided the man- ';. power. State Health agreed. However, at the last public hearing SC,IQ:ID said they had Insufficient staff and/or equipment to do the job properly. At this point State Health said adequate staff i and/or equipment would be provided by them. r 4. Deficient in that it does not contain a detailed evacuation 21an. The EIR contains the evacuation plan prepared by 'City departments . and JhBA. The Huntington Beach Civil Defense Department has assumed the responsibility for completion and finalization of this plan. I have taken the opportunity to notify the Civil Defense Department that the evacuation plan has become an issue of appeal. ` J�1CI: K. IIRN'AN C R ASSOCIAI f:S, INC:. 444 West Qcran Bivd,Sulte 1400.4eng Leach.CA 9DS02 • 213,437.4148 ++....-.1Ksi .a3-..,rb:a..orv.•sea:.:w.v..w........r...�.-�.. _.. ....._......, � .. . '. .- ._._ ..... ,.w—.... ..uw•x;c:•r:-vi rz:;C:."Yfr .:',t>Ti_•:.....".:}.:��:w1M.� ..-i'L�+{`, f i 1 - i 1r 1 1 1 i ifoaa Irait 4 1 , � �t.. ,ti t •i�f� 1 1 1 1 � • ,�,•� t T ► �s f , � 1! � a t 1• t S}at t J Y i t 1 �. ,� Il2.�ICQS r" Ci'i4 I C "#"fin 4v, .; ', 'IMF1[1'gt .ltAl?IAIY'd'> 1i 'l�1 +glI Lr� r•*r,•s,s+'cr� +ti'.:w+.r.�yt"r q,}'.Sr�,,,[(.�� .R r 1 _ y �*'[(?' '�'�"r^'•';f' S`, t.? ;�'T � CS'T."y'....'^i t4 ! {'��. y �•t41 �. t ,� Y,l+f�•t�, 1 ' Tab.f rl't.10. 1, t '11tt t /iti) +1..r+tj .Is•` F- T t*r. �`•� i' S .� i+t' s is .r\C"� ��V " �F ?, Y � ;`l t � ytt ,�+( ^, � r.• p + 't�� 't� Al•tt o t t1 '.i ; t t tt �.1 .� t +. Ib�',•3.�Yt i ' 'Z'. ` k. Ifr , ,f` f.'r� t `'tl. tE � !' ��. t a S ( FFs t 4 t tic !.1},�� �!�{ ti lit{it .f 1 ti�t•'rt.� pit 14rS . �1 ' Ir 11• r i j 1 j t ti S 3jJ4 ��\r�; , i! 1 =`tl t r1• i• ,t '+�r, f�` �'�fit t r "Y� �; ,{n 's�} `t !s i.5i,, FIy! ,` `►lt���1` ;Mi [.1� i.•1� r .S ��Ir^�: �'f_� _:�� '� , .', ^'J�h�l t�1t ►vy�, t1 4�: ty� i �!( 'i,l ,t�J..{+�1:r-�-e � �',YI" tR 16 'ri' >r[ j. s i' �' a'(�11,1�, ,"c.S��.�,ll, t. :�i rF�t,t.t� � i ..i �}r ( , t,.2 1 '°�-+ 3 •ttl� l'i,tt',.tk'r',' '; `i:� Y � �t 1 it. iF f �1t •• ({f�r :,r•.`�.�5'=l15� ,--�. ,t1 ... -:t,., ,r.�.a•"ti pr �i\. .�. .;,iJtG)€ �.. .;e .,- 0.°1_. ;�'.l11;. �`�,'!4t . . YI+i'f `.�{.,',}::' i$d. k1�� l 7 �d :t ".�a`,� tr t. . % • l-"7 fir. Peter E. von -,ten January 12, 1981 Page Four i I have also requested them to initiate finalization of the evacua- tion plan and to attend the January 19 hearing. Civil Defense officials indicated that the plan is essentially completed. ( 5. The applicant has not been required to prove its financial r sibility or to post a performance bond. es on- , The EIR is not the place to discuss the applicant's financial ' responsibility. p y• As Par as the performance bond is concerned, the Planning Commissiun raised the issue of a performance bond as a potential condition of approval, and After discussing it rejected it as being Infeasible and/or unnecessary. As indicated in the above response to appeal comments, we are continuing to work on portions of the EIR plan of mitigation (i.e. , Air quality monitoring and evacuation plan). We hope to have this material corn l pleted by the City Council hearing scheduled January 19, 1981. In i conclusion I w-,,vld like to state that the document is the City s, since 'they were the load agency on this Project. At their request tills has been one of the most thoroghly analyzed sites and scrutinzed set of reports that I have aver been associated with. Cal plan of mitigation is probably excessive andEcertainlyven ltexpensive tile ni- (i.e. , $3 million +), it is what is required to do t11e Job prope 'while at the same time assure adjacent residents of their healthrund safety. 1; I hope this letter clarifies our position regarding this project and its current status. • Sinc rely, Jgfnes C. Crisp, {la ager Environmental P nin : i cc: Mr. James R. Barnes ;• .t, ' t ;r JACK K. BRYAN1 & ASS06A I1S. IN''C. 441 west ocean nivi•suite 1400.tong Beach.CA 90I302 • 'ata'Oar-414a r 01 �f •�+, 'Y',.•Ze'S 1`xi'Z+'S7.n�1 , ,!'�� t .l�'7"YF,�-.`^ r.�?.t•. ,+t S' .'i*L"^T.T'TS'^ 11 ? S t.i'T, p, `.,x• i�jt `.,('.•1 in".:.i.;..T`" l 1., _;S.f. '� y `(T�fk ,`, IS �yf .(�• t t.' �' .' "',;It l.:i i,Y,:�7 t t7Y r4 '. ` ! 1ltlrrt J t S„�" .t,..•� jt• A, y�.L.�. j�.i ,.I � 11 r 31 '4;rtr ,h. ' t - -r" tf x.� y 1 :.• .,� 't t� '�Sh `r.i'}�'t . r. .Lt.• .1 t1, is 1..},., `( ,�. .tt lit.;,...r1 ,-,'kG i1} ! e �.•.. t. i .} �4tf =�,.f+,v•i - '1l 1. ii "1 ;! 1�'�;121 "t "Ar�.1, � , , t1 ity 7`..�• `.�+r.rk t."i S 71,1�: ,� ��Z�i-. � t et �+'. Y �f�-yr .�. .�. �+, .l �. 'xi r�z,,` `C.�i j� •1�1 i,'�`F, p �. /..,. �+i �.. /' t ti.•.11R;r, 751, .1 111: t.t,t, y ,ts,tr� V'/fr�.;` 3 tl:t'' f�r., t �.> :t., t t t "}f ty� ""tr.f1 •i ,TRi t{ �y .r.r• �; r s r.,t,� ,� e y `�t. .1 t�. t 1' P r '.:1�:� \,1"�it. r" 3 �t -� �i,. ' S•s:j ..�i��"i Y�.•li•J., .� '' r ,rjy' � "t.t y,•.•t...-... Ft .fit I' .,`t.:}, �y Ir f lr:"'S�' 2 �.+r frtr'1rk�`S� i�j.•3t ' .+,lf e.(�,L `v(r ��ti e.i i�'•Y t1,.k,r��t = {�'.r.ii � t �\\(1 ign � r f , ._t y��,•1'd.`,'"il�, 1r�, "\S :jt�r i,�.1 :�; S'c�*+`�1S''",z,i�`.c � ..t. I��, !.ti,� .b`..�� ,�`{1Jt �r� ,.3; •.rt,Y•,K. i ��y L�,4. 1` .A• 4•i<;� ;L�a• S�.;,�'�j( _"»�� .}:`,�1! 1 r.,.1 -r "w \ `� i\ �' (t 1 \ 1 ♦ L '4 L- ,1 1 e j �1 ,1 1 )}I.t.".r. : . t ,• fr t �\ ,.,i, r� 1', 4 .t..11,'1•! ;6E 1. � � .I.a, '�•i't i .�,+.1"{yri.1 r.?�C,,,4,�t f{�S{ ;.,• ' Z. i�"yr. •t ��,,tl't17Klyt�i Cl�•e k't'.,;•.'X:�`,"�,�':d +")��}`,''.1�.-1\� 'Ltcjy„ � tl�l h.i,'�.t�(.;�i.lt"t(Jf 1 ":+r it i�_ fe1�k,•."��ryAj`I,�..t M1l.,1`': '=i'„ t:gg3 r•,, e�F'{'7 i� yy-�� 1� �\ � y7at. �4 �'. 7 �t Iti L( �,., !' of 1.. •�.-, �. 1. -+ , �-�S i4!� t., .r �'' '..iL i t 1 !!>� .�•="�i ! ,� i.y.ti��, t.,A� 't t' > 1b�.�i.�l`�Si. . .r :I {��K 1.r`';�'7. ,L: <y}� ��� +.k�.�t. !f �'S"��5�3 .•4i 1��r`fi y\'../•.t \r,�.{..,, t�•/i-.lr,rl..!t:t !" -'s\I�r-:ii"i,,.:°.1�.i. .t�.[!�' _fi. �. .. ,:.�'''x1t:.:�.?tr._...efa�CL'�:'t _.{J:.��.r.,.'i.!1\tt"..1st:•k,�. ,;.i'1..5..'l:ar_.�1:} .IL�rkt{ ...:,(t ., > t,)��,• • y w.x j + 1 err OZ/1 OF OFF F F r� •�T^+ � •w? •,5 4,'��} ,tk 1, #`t�« ,`'f;'.,+;w�«�';�� �' � '�,t "� Ir " l�J,","t "A vu;''t;: A "�a �� 1 i @ _ ,5�� ,.i+'71 ��', ,y � + t� Y>t ';..�:. � rl,,1l #.�lyy Y..�# a � � y�r�,iAli a�, �, R♦'�}. {�1�•.i x,, + �•'�� L4, 1 +,, t Gr •..Sl + 11', �,. ":. �. �' �.i a :�.Y •.♦7, + \•' '1 "A`, rf' 'a Lir'{.'j I ,1.�•- to+ `'TT '+/1 ''i.' I/ "� �* S w t, rl# j } y.• r .: A „ +.tii yr,4�..ky.,i� �.. 1+ ��.,L:. S_ )r. } 1: �♦ i .S.fY}'.+I `' #l;,' �, ,.k, .fi ,.'J:41.}�¢�1 ,9 ,���� ^�.}+ �� .}.r.��i ;,}�! �,(�;,,� rY.� ,-� ,x��: =1«: �,!, ._:k twti �'�, +�rti, r }�.. • 1� .'5tti }S/'ttS}w ���,�..�i. +�•VV ka..r,,K ti 1 si74, r r•t + .�r.�a�'' ���� ` • �4�,�� i ��..� ,} ,`:,.11t `x'� ! ,Y,I1 ,i�T � "+a ., �. R ,�.' � r ` ''�` 4 lyt'�f f ' l « t,.'. � i ,:.�J,,4�?\y.y� 1 !� a.� /�'-a i �;i r 7 c �.'`�1 (��.,+-. ��. '+k' -.R rl •} A�t,r� i ���'� .�v�4: �+ A Yti.� t .� rfL.(� +,;{ �i .y I'� � t� "�•i�I, y r}'.«1. ��a#��.A �J *+ji'�,'�• i i$� " I�''',"�k i.A.Y,iI , S y) '4`h 7+ 11�'� �,}�,��, t �{ � yyA r ,�',�,► 1.�. '.'� � Si.••�� 3+. +J • r:- 1 .r W 2«) -�'��• 1 �8 �, , 'e,,.. 1 *� >41 � 4 y�y�ry, ,a j, t R y' • t � lA,,.xl {t j, fix. } 1 �1 R�� A i h �Y Rly � .�.�Il i r4.�..: 5 .�r..'�1 1� 1'��'�i1.�"5 � 7 «, }� ��' 4' S.�'^y� t .�+ tF t•ti�hs �fj,i� �•. �� h''�� k tS•�v�� d # Yt w '� ��' +r� ,. I 1+"V t�' �" !, '�1:1�1 71y,. 4•y d� 3,f 5� �-�e '1.t.1�t.�y„ 1�+ �'i) r. �. ' *.�•�, g µ wfKt'y � " f +A \', .Ati� 7 x+^ 4l < 1 rs � ,` Y '.ti �;+ ��+: A7' �� �i�r " ! �M,j4� }1� 7" S L i �' �y��� � 'r� 3'�rl. 1 ►, �.r ��1. "1 �4 �, y�'�� •#'� tt"` �}� l}. 4\ ''?i 1 ` * '1� 1 r r,�Y � .: a6# '�p • �t� r Sr�4Y�. '��+. } '� 4 wl « 1« ��'�Y,'* 1ti7.5 } r.. IS � � ,w '• � 1>`� t •. Yt y ...r� �{��_.�� .��r f.�# ti i++�rtr �' �i�µ�l ?•����+,� '.Q'�� i�'"�� TJ+{ 3�� Y I� k 4�.1r� e�Rh��'+��rr`gl'4�yk�}1'Y �«I e�;.hl� �yx�+1��'b r }����+S,��� ��.t i��y i � Y�k. F F�F�F k,+r'r,�13��.�.� �1��4� ��#•.i��'��11�S:$ '4`kS�A lri+^I 3 �'rj �1� ,��. , �1r" ! 1 r r 1 � 1 I ,� C, , }�a 4 a� +.,1 «•�n �t ',�';�y� � ��'-J'��� � 'a ���r � ��y sk �� ��,;,ti i ��"� ..' Xt �1, �w +•� ,r >,°?r4°���p`}���' �" .��1 L 1Lf j �,< 'R.FI ' •z .' t ,�,+�'i++� }�i ,.� � ,Y �er+i�'wp �'�.}r��1i� �+y',{+4�«h+, �1 ,Yj t"++' z, �1�Rt'.i�F ,}�«��aL'` ^i+'t�y�y4 Y�2 •� 4 'p i,` � ,, i�` 4 �. I++.'i�� -.ti.l Ir� .a r;r �.. . y .�l l\'{.�}.� �+{ya;}����It '"f's'', 1r $+' I`.,�$.�`t �1 ,^r��y•A 4 l;?�1 r .��: 1+Y 1�.. ! ��• �.ti,'«, r ` �{WIM y `yr Y ,i,.i� • a7'y` I. y�}4 J 1 \ f« 1rS 1 �! h. "trey, I��} ,. p�v� ,�* i'I ,h'+�•�,�i� '�r���Y�;.«���,F�4 �'r y n}��f'�f�. � �r {.� '" � �{���', �`��r+r •�', �' k,�,� r ,;�r �� h� t z kl 1y�44� v n +1,.,l` "!,«i J� r ti+a�t + "� e,• y t, 'I 'p 1� i ti y.�' , • Y • i �+ 1 'a.}. y, ., .4 � 'n eT '� '}�• f, J� •f -,� � p^'a P• r'�,rn' 1.�4.. 1 rr. � ,7i Ptr+4 n. � 14+,��t if , �;� }r yr./ ,'Y•.F i4 r F'"'il r�+'r j 'alr T rftir ..F� ��r+ 9 t.` ,{ ti .,;« r r,.. ..t� ;o• :. �f � ,t ,, r r'1� {}r, ar •�.3�1��f���M*� '�t7 ��� `� r�'E��r'y1�1 \r'�:�� �,'•�• �r r1.5�;, � " t t��t � � ������7� �r f�r ,. ,) f4� `_,J � { 7.tf 'y f f A , t I�tL��� +l e� 4 !� � i�,!F} Si pp L a4�{i• + •�r�k= '�St1.,.F^ 'r •n 1 L, Z F 4y t J'41, a, Q e F ,M 1• , 1 I��y� �+i +1��n 1 �+'� i�''"1 ��, I�,� '4�' p1i�'�.� 7fY.�S }4 }�� s, �ta�tTA�: �� i _ ': �, ( �•� ♦�l 1 `"� .�2 4 "' ( f� S�; fE �� r �r� � , .+ y'.. �� r ,tk t ,� F 1.r haF �,�y ,. �� i,� r 'F ��F�i;a {�` �y,. 1 r �Jr.,t{;S' 4r �'�'�r•Y. ZAA r ,f 4,.�:. ��j � �p1 o � � •� �r � b S',4 `;1�a: t �Y7i��T` �QM �k�fi� s�4 �,� + y��,1r4 '�i ^h:1.+y1:1.(.' '.rk k y{4 4 Vu.. 1� ,p�91� *{ � '� •� � �'�': ���� t'V '1 ;,f',7>t } q Pk b IiL 7 d �k T, +� ,1 Y, i7jtwf,} ,�'p � 'G'� 4�� "� + r,u �1�h ys� � 1� ���ti,�� k r,l��• 4r � ��` ,y, r/}7�a�,���+y,�l ` Ji7.[ t '�'' i����r eT�rr�Ysl. �� A i f'Gn�'.+L$S rJ r���; 'E ti��FrtWj/• �,d,�+Jti 1r��1 �"'`"�i Y. • �f1`�� �i����}�,�� "i ,,��'� �"�+,ra} , r +Tir 1 '�t h .al y1 '��'s�syt,r^ t V7 }, E� rl,�e t � r11tt^t��'C 4 ',FtiFZ' t � r ?';. '� ••C w �J'� � � M;}vyf a .' ��'�, .t 1 ��y`f r r l��ltiy'r,r���! ti + r;� ,�. r � ti. i, 1�`";.�} �Y' t M :,t •� r' t r r 4 a, 11 � F�. '� Y♦ti:,,"��V �':' r�, �+ }rxx•� -r'jy/rJ1 ^� �'�!.'r, .� t t` y y t F'Qi� 'z� �'�,r t � (�t s � 's v t a+4'I W y, 4 r y{{�Ty ri�;.` � ':�.L7J�''fih� `, �yr�'.y r1P � tFL� rVhrfr nitt �.4+ 4 f. T F r� .4�e r����` { h �iL�•,�,J�' ��67+ ;4.�iTr +Ir r f`'.���, ��1^ 4���� F`�r�rf 10 Y rt���i4ill 9� }`�t T't9 �1 F r i .+*}I�>S Y + t >r +a� �P, � -fl1j,C7lL t •fS'ni .}'rr+ �1 Vq} tt{F{� . ��, 4 4/ �. . Tk' e � �A. 144 y r r Y ` e'r i e, t4L {I ' ♦ i"jr` , +Fd 54.et 1; rh { 1 , pt v ,, a ,��• r r 4 9yf r y rty� ,'�VV',�1P'{'a���•.y� �d.�Sr�p"...I r,�:`rk..'lk�.; .! ��;,. '1 ,��,�-�� ifp�I' •,. �'�. d, C� '�-Zh t�yft r'�`.''. ti+t :�'r.�,',S,`n�. ,y,��+'.`'1��:�'^,�r_•f i ft.r t .�L. �..t. ' � 4 ,.�t,�.M y� ] 'r. *�j` I 4 {'.• `�eJ h 4r,4 .FtT' �i y � L .`. S,ti,;,. I,+ a �'•� r 'hr;�'�� ,4-� r, Ohl �1a•L}'lr. fs }+,�Qr SI,�..i . Mk!F'i'y Jrn Cy t p'�•,F`w ti. 1�"� i � 4 �` r{.. ..(. • 1: � 1 � �iY;. h `G.4 � „�.�.� 1'r ,! y �'•7 r t4 ,� te�`•`� ! f,Y r.,�•,kvs � I .`� r�,� tiF G+. ` •,Cy4 7. 4�1ti S .l j rT.1+ �'t {,.i 1 �� 1t .:'� rti ` ♦ .y �ny�` fa'S 5. ..� ti ,� i i� r�'k 4rr� ��bY,,, ,� + .. ' {r >� "r �, 1 t ��y �'h 1 {�� r tl ►i f fit. � r { 'F� 5r r r , `rr.rr ` � '�• � }.,t,o•h � \.r7 Y' 4'i.. `fir � �'rY,4N•.,k 1 hh� ,.Sri t ity�3�r.j�l �� ttr�ti« `j• ,1.���.; b �.• ,aa..J�;is"rlr4 ,'`,yh•4 1�F`-, ,.. r.r'''� }.`1r. 1.tL ,'i`�V r �f (" }1,Yr`y y,.`�. • 4,`•t�, i' 4t�'i.+ M, k�+ a :,r�r ; 4yrvt Y :,, to '-S �Mti�txF r t.,kl,i a ti!„r`,4 yF,yF J',f;+yhr„� h :y, '`a^1 �," �•:1 �,r �,1 i,yr#: ,r" '1'�i `JJF'? k i�' ""rni' '��'j';ii t#C+<r,.St2r �'�j +' ,,�•{ - " 1 'r,., 'r..�, Y' r'Y.;r? �451'. t" _, ;,��., r .�'�';; r �.•.,.:+ ,. y�.,y,•..N �J..^�: ,,.,1 r { ,'t +i !:;i � �_,� °rAt .li`��� f r�. ie. f � .'. Y,- '+'1,4 I��w lxr�'-htuti'�` lu'l'h;+tn ti�'tt•':ku� y,,.'F�a�4Y'4><t:�„�;` `'tN,r�J�'.55'. f`'�.�s"�- �#�,4� t�1i1,� ''�•�;,C��'; + k �.'�e� �� dtf ;r• ,y� r +�l �• ,��. 1,'� >�;,f��� r*�.t� � �,i, :ti t� r. er .'� r �e�3.>ltr r .,�5r :.ai,. .r�7' � l,�y� ti!�:�,•� t � � t l� + � fir• r� "� . C • 1 I '� .� ' ♦r- frr a , i 1 '� f w 4 � • w 1' ► � • � ' w ra • i } A � 9p + � • �ift�;Ss 0 •�{� It 9 d . - . ,•___ � 1. M • t= + • 11111 al ,m 1i i - -f � st,��f r 1 �•t ■1 all , r x , ' fz P ,xr V ` i Y r; �%3Aur ,-.a, 1..t" � f 1 1�', ,;.,, , 7l. '1 M1 +� >$ �. �}1Qf'',�'�µ d*� �i�}�aV T• M., , �1l;4fi .w�,)l,t���A„Y.�,+1 �t , �`•ti ,. .,. +%.c,., s 'S•.� J�,. '� � t ,f. ,.Y:'+1L -•,�. .� l ''�; �+' �1, 47. ,19y A� k = {r•t,< �fm'w ,. *! V. .,�•" hti '�9 �'-a �4, ti A. c' 1, �� ,1 ye y� �, 1iS:yr' 'r6 y� y4ii•f .�.r 1 d Jii,T t1 iw; ,C { +F4;M t;r ♦ ! yr.7 9 o r % k � ''% �..+ � +�Apy � A �,_y r, 3. r 't`y _ fy. •/,j r.7 1 ' �ii. 5 p,, �� n ! i:,: "� k'17 Mt t4';� �4�1',',.� ,,#r.•.��'�f .'/ ��.C� �..- 11�1+ �! 1 �,r.�., %y ,� 5�. i. �F 4;T r4,, t y�. ,r. fir ��:� 9w } { r k • + tUf �� t�.r i �' S .�•• i 1� i t T J';� t i. t, f� �� .�. � C ti` ,t' '' ;'G� :� yy�;�. 4. IY'�t ,:+ r •l,I % .l. F .,X A. 7,Q ,�tr ,h�r.w'.� 1r, }f ',+yf. +14 ,+•y.� yla t;' l {•f '" �rt. r,- t '. • ' S.�w' F >ti, :a'4�'} k` �,�y1.�•. MY �'r !"f17,w r;��l �.'{,'t' •�S'� ti%� `.h, •'��••���•{.1♦+.Y -�`'�4'''j �� � �1�� Y,`�/' )l'.y�y k J4/'t.•., t ',a rt4 s` YI riC, y�, '�,. �_ .% �`i:1�' 1 � Ai. �U';,1''4;-.r [o Z e .1 ,. � }_ :�.+A, ..h, , MP' r '.�{.♦tilr:2 'S 4 � � f �, { �q41 3� .iNI A,',1..Vti+,Q{. '�' .%fib'+Q �..�-�+«� ;�:: >7+. 'ti� %" �'W. �,.-,„ •,•i. ,".awl'' ;r�Ti�w+. „ k .� �r�„ �',.,.f��' �..���.+� ,i.��r�t2 �1', , V 1. � •'. e% .!�f.. %1•' y !1'I:+ J ,t ti f: , ,f� :r,.� r �. //t �1 ,< r' ;�, i M, h ,t k�:' + /,'+ 't�' •��`5., ,Y f',4 � L� ''�! •' �" t� libr�,'�' 0� V'�� S ".,Cw r +. �C4{G'. �;r. .1•' L% 'K �P, �,. % y r�` }I� , `+,_, r'f%�, 1 �� 4. „'1?<�1.. .�t � �qt ��`a'qS "'''.�tiY r.tl •..y iV+ rr {1 '4YY 1 ^,`�.,�'•!� p, '+FS'.a r t }� N9R r 4 '�'Ayt ,� .,I �' + y ��� .Q ..1 `, *,�f+'�..���1 :��,�, Jl•1 ', + f +1L � � �. ��.1;,':'`5� Sw,1 i � � ,•�,f � �+,�� r f.'ytr�}� "�Cc 14 s 1��t y '� ..► � �,� ;� a,r,F '� � k �, ,, �r�}1. ,I,;� hF? ��� ! 4F � } �� .a, i �1�', �t t a , thtg'�`� j� f �'�t.' 41, i. t U ,► t n R T r r ti 1, � ,., i 'y k � aF ` ?. �' i 4 �t a)!r � Ar ♦ .�.. h '1 � M1�q � � : % , } w vb ,l '.7A I t ��� 4 � �Y V , r, ? � iY.f ,�( )h�' �..F ,U, ,ti I Y� i r i n+•.f�l� � 4, {{ t 4� �' kk �. �v „ Q �r. a .� s w�'�f � !�r'g�vj`,+�,� p, ti Art , `t"•l \t4trtw�i�`}yT'Qhv1�' #ryj,. �� �;L,.� Ny ���t�`7 �'� ," r�;'+h �,`+�i^t� -••���, �� "'� p �i� (,,.�,r 1' ... %. .. !�y � k 41 11•'! fi `11 r,4�w�t{ " '�1'I, + 1%' I�'!t f 1 xa¢ 5wo- 4�" � r% � 1 -.'�. {I S J• Y 1. n4•�'r S;,c. �,,,1f i• i h.4: C+'4.��{�`}]f.��+,t}'t.. y� ,A,_ , ft t}4 k dl'�. T +,T k� _'I {, 1 lOr M R T• Sk}+ # 7..^, k 1 y i J+} 'p4 i,{ w 1+ �� A},f L� �:x ��*n l t..^^(,* ,l+t.+r,i r ',1 , "F 1� 'C tia P �.4!'•1 $r4 �'4 �. 4 `, k u Y l F' } 4 L�y� r 1 +•1q � �h f { r1 t1 t �*`k)t 4 �1 "p i " (t 9 1 �► t ci#;r� w `' I i A � b p., •� " .�1.. 7� a'.��' M PIP u� 'fY. {w •�.{ a• % ry �j�, 1 r•rI',4i + �iw�,}%�tt ` = x � i' ` .%{'y�i1, 41S�1LCAA;i� IY • >� ?M } F. L y.} y, '�,.ty, � t.Q y 'k•',' ,y � . t� Slpr �y; ` :; {� ,. r, .t s, ,>xd,y .y.'} .tyl'3 '• ' �'.;.. � ,� La. +, +', r 1.� 4�i ti1`F 14 },f—I'�;Y yy'Q• V Y +,7� ;IDV l•{°h "F r Ay ; y 7 Ik w y �,�' + C ..k,tfiJ pI }Q tw �. 5 p �'r y+ t ��. '4, b �� a �Q q+ta try rya"♦w d"A;�`, k � tF � �'7k �A 3 � •r q � , s, a w t , + 1� f 1 �,,R`4r4 ��� �� n���,t.�',•+�� =�i" �;t�,'1 �t�"�i t'1; �c ti.d J{ :�� � �,► �,�����k '�!"1 C M��..���y ��8� �i+++llly#�..�„�,k �� � i yyl� A �.yJ, 1,�s � .,F �,�.,. a�lj r3. ,��r�,^��1;{�A� 1'tY:�!' Kf .��� i'"�,Q�A�::�%�PP�' i�ri! �����111. , r• �� "Q"eR}..1•. e��IFl�w'i'�`�l 5 �,"'i'��,�P �: {t. ?' fi' - .♦ a .',.. 1 h.+l, -.4• :e,,.', 1'' 'y;.Y •!., AI F9� 4 MIX t g�k '1 k4 NEI ,tl r � tiC• 3 t r y , ! r r � r �' Do' h'� �ti a,v R; 'dy1 r �� �! ~*����'"��ti� y .��r�,� �`R p - ';� • ��`�t' ��k�r�+'�s�. �;��► ,� by �}1 �{ 3y, t t`��I k `�t u) •t }, r �" 1 r7•.,�,t, ,�, �`jr 1 1Atr{l"ItI nS y' i �' �fi�'5 •'Y,{1yi "_, i1h,t .� t. 1 11 ,'f ry. .'� kl 1 S i r������ !* n11 d 1t``•} /, tD,'. � ,4 � M '5..,� t { n k�r �.,y`+�' e.�rtt�.'e1 �":r ai=^+k,}4''4 � s +.• „ t �kx•' k �' �. '�i�.'�1' y�,`►�� �' `{ �,}� � '�`. 't'4 t,�j•�,� ��Y � �'�` �,� `�T;�.r ���fr' ,y t,� �,�}�i�,,IAr��<; �t 3. � ti r�r t r ,r`.c' r �` � y �t '� �r � ��� �l��j Y��'R'f 1�rr w r�` r t fi,,,t. '� 4 ����� y`•1 �"it' +`r �•�- !' `*� �t,t�y «�� �tdh'�.v . w •t �' ' ;��'� ,.�•� t�{�� t�Vypti,`.���?"�y' !'3 t�' }:� w,v� : tr; ,AX.�,.,. 1�. t}• S y M I R a ��t ��,� "� f� '�•tiiy � �'•;ir�'.���'� Mq f ����- � ��. +l. i �h•1 ,�r +',4t 3 r:��` riV�,h� °i� 1 �v,i,�.>�* �• ���S�j-•k t{t. ,yt �i��•k.;L���,�t'�� M i w, l i .6 S ,+t' y ; ^ i 1 5` , •a- Sr ' ,` r(� ��.�,���,,��,S�t � �a �� � ��{ � `� � r• 4 �.�',�•!, i��\ },tF F�� f r M1 4�ty�4;rkR �'rk h�;V►�'�r p5 ,� ��'K.Y 1 yL.r Y� 1��t1.�.7! ��::.� {.. �tx t. K + k° �y.,r 1,M 1i,T t fi�ek •i J ' i «, { F , S''`r ',, 1 r� {4, ,i', N t ., r.;v=•.i y�{ :r's I'^��li�%:$",�� r t'f�� �^i'd,l/1 '�r�� ��9 .kt1�'��,kR y��', 'l f� aY.��(!?, .�S � a� yf,� � �,y`iw +�� '�ti..�a�?`I .y�_ t.•�, } 1�;•. ae� q. -} tl ! .t'; rl �. { �t a.,i � 1�� ) Y��iy 1.�.Y' .;i .l x � { i.��.� kti - �' '4 x `.S ��' ta.:t �l. N Ir`� •�� 4�+ A a �r y� �. :r: r �f 'uf';Ot �.. +, � \ ,� �1•�r[ � � ;�,i�`15?1x, r� .�F. � ��.i•„r p e .ctirri'�.��, '�� � � �t r v dr{�" it '(y""Y, t.�,:+f;i•�.7 � � Y'�t!R ,l � ! � � � y�v!' � !' �'t{i ,,, r t � ':S ; �4 ..s*qf .:`Z! ., �,r 1,y,..;..A�. J►r'�.l�, �r��. a 4.4 1... ��T 3 "�`,� ;4;t, : ,� ��.S f'{�e'� � r• .� '�'Y". R �1i�, !v � �r. �'i«1` .t:��'1,'+ . St D t y_v ;r 1��itr,. i ,•.,, r r- ::� ,��,.'� i 5- �v C".,• r.-, t D is�'; i �' n. .-dr F. "i� r;.«.+ty, ,•, Yrrwt {` ,3,t i ro v.�t.t46 �`+3� r�. �,,[.R •� ti ` 7 ;� ti { " 1 3 w` ,.a 'n .t . Syr „4. r ' l r: 4 1 r 1 a a . • '`f �� ilttttt rs � �Ir t(�r ._-:-J/sY 1� J ILI � <Z.L I - i; �y jl0 � Y r-----Y-OF ' ! f 1 1• 1 of 60 I I ae II .:+\}i�•,.{.~ .. .i, .,.r.�i. ^��"t..�.. ._..'. .�2-"1-.1.•....x-irv... �i.... ..,i .. � ...r�:( .. '7t+,Al'•i ..JI. .. tii✓!� ".'fin l'1•t i..1 i t�'J i .,... `.err{:. • i '� ! 4 ' r r �, ,.1+,::i. '+.��•f. .�;� �( f f � � Sri} , �' f r 4 � i r ` 1 ,.'lit•, 4 1 � ri � ."!�S S�• (i't•.! ,' 1 L _ 7 t INl {��� �rll, �3� tkti�t.� t�i},��p i� Ij � t� �'� �( ,/,,�r y � i '. .Y� �')� N��� � s •i "�,E Fi'tyt 1�+�` . '�.Vo } � ,7K, i,Sy!! �:.'Y+ �,r ,� �.j..w} .�.( '.1 41�'"w` r+'1:! f W ���5 ti ! � + rr'v t i'• 14 �i� r���,..�� �.t,..� 'S` •i1 .tr��'�,!'l .;1.,A�. 'YHS� A 7'� !., ` '�i r � f� ti `, �] 2t � t •f, f�t:� 3 t1; '"�ti. �;. v. r•. �� �t � " �` 31r �t "� '+�.��� .1• C� i.t�,, �1, " .�iGS•�i��.�i�'ii+, r;�'t les ��.k .i0i�4�1� i�' �5�.�1���1��'t��.y..1�0'�.��� t.S t'h���t� �i�+� ��::�'w�7f`4+ a Tr T '17 FU IL F3 ttf .t C'`•C3 1 I i'l f I FM IL t r ^J � c6� C� 4WD RID ,c !G I k 200 r---m-="-----..._._�.-��! Get _ [�__ - --_� � \•`1`� M-47 TM r _,.__l ..�.tir �\� V `` ---•-- - t.:! !� lit t � � ` h�u�M�, c� yl \�� may' \,` '>ff t ��li i �I•1I(�I j QY:!" 1 �I�� I i -_= i IF i3�.wQ (Jo �X .'rRNdV'►"yv^IIM1:`�C,I,�y',y,iS..,y'r aar+.w,++R^.�'+.tN.w�Iyutu s °K.b.....t• ... d�_; _ - °�.:.�., i.:::.:a...,:.:e.R;�':..a �c ,,r a rn,t n,. _ _ -.w,�''.v"!Y;'.. i ' O + • y�T1 L.. I i C' liC�'A•> • - s r ti r , ► , ,- LI L,I, 4-1 -/i L d" _l I O i n Dro g l Publish Postcards � G 1 NOTICE OF PUB C HEARDIG , VVI rr NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the I City Council of the City of Huntington Beach in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center-, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:00 pon., or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday ? the 19th day of January_ 1991 for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Huntington Beach Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract No. 10853 , Conditional Use Permit No. 79-23, 1 and Environmental Impact Report No. 80-5, a request to construct a 224-unit planned residential development project on a 12.54 acre site located on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street approxi- mately 650 feet Mouth of Warner Avenue. �r I All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal of Tentative Tract No. 1O651, Conditional Use Permit IJO. 79-23, and Environ- mental Impact Report No. 00-•5. Further information may ba obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. C+tL'1•�U s r { t CITY CAP 11MITI NG a OIi I EACH i by Alicia M. Went-north city Clary. ,....�. v-a..rcaa�sr,2wtar..sYY3�'t:Y..i:^h'�:tA�^3�&:ir'"-•.,+".�:,Y:y NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC NEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 79--33/TENTATIVE TRACT 10853/ ITEM ENVIBQNMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 80-5 t TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE (AFP'3AL) DATE: January 2, 1361 FROM: Development Services PLEASE SCIIEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE 19th DAY OF January , 1981 C s are attached i AP's will follow +! tla AP's Initiated by: Planning Co=ission Planning Department Petition * Appeal � X _ Other Adoption c,f Environmental Status (r.) X YES t:C1 Refer, to Jim Barnen Planning Departmvit - Extension 5554 for additional information. * If appeal, please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal. 4