Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Tentative Tract 12268 - CUP 85-24 - CE 85-27 - CDP 85-7 - ND
Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all kind$including public notice$ by decree of the supenor Courf of oranya counir, California. Number A•6211• dated 29 Septombei, 1961, and A•24631.dalyd i 1 June. 1969. (om STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange 040-C 40140,10 .Wq wrwro t{'V by IIM �RW�wI q MI M r Pans D r+tll 10 OKf'GOffMI Mgt11 f I am a 131lizen of the United States and a resident of �a OP �l) the County aforesaid, 1 am over the age of eighteen w~f01111111je t years, and not a party to or interested in the taelow ApraI►►lofrc entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange to PLM'`1a COLURS M All VAL Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the �tia�r NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general Circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Me", T County of Orange. Slate of California, and that a eta f l :'i MEes�r g otv atiat a NO tie MMtl by VAS 11 Notice of -- nub 3.v iiiiAr i;ij all ia00 at p Chrnf�e� Of the. CttIr M if lwrr�t/ t �~tiaon e�wmow w of which copy attached hereto Is a true and completeAmp r° ,e s1eitrK copy, was printed and published In the Costa Mesa, . retna w.. Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, rasre Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna OW ' @each issues of said newspaper for 1 time "he. r • t rrso/e� afxrsaroUNiZwtlw" to wit the iatlue(s)of i ie else •err Nsllalbt�, Ju2)r 25 198 5 198 wwd awe ultra gar'r>b M Of~r 7M wwn ar �$ie��alilie_a, — 198 uN�ia$ni f141ieN*+'al�elrtr im�TV N WSW"MW*am er- ^--- • 198 ,fiance a���Mti standard$ to 599—_ t+e aelIsk* .da of WAIG h" fiM ana icy rl�,a,r a l• ff�$eoA, I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the et+lapuewa�le$ae$niad foregoing is true and Correct. Al are Illow 10 Will`airw. f are eatdreve llraii t IV or rear,aafd Executed on L i v z 5 , 198 5 '°�'"er 6 In rW at Costa a, California. /� af. *�°'d��n� y,! city °Rio Signature �o ire srrr+irtWasom! MAC", 86 a. ftleau cinuv r•.ow Devy a 1ie TTfrirli t 1 �W) 1 Hit. „� CITY OF HUNTIt''�iGTON BEACH 2G00 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 C;i;MtS OF THE CITY CLERK ti I August 8, 1985 BWC Vanderwood Company 615 S. Flower Street 41201 Los AnVeles, CA 90017 Attn: Anthony Canzoneri , Managing Partner The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its adjourned regular meeting held Tuesday, August 6, 1985, concurred with the j decision of the Planning Commissica in approv-%ij the Palm Court Project, This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from August 9, 1985, to apply to the courts for ,judicial review. i If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our 1 office - 536-5227. I Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk I AJIW:CB:bt CC: City Attorney James Patin, Development Services Director (TMa plwnw:71443642V) 1 § 1094.5 SPECiAi, PROC .Enlhr,S Dart 3 Note 370 ,•.:sate for sww trial dr Oast,. Prr+.tu•1 s. ititted t•„u,.,:•.(ouer Itnil Stu JurlMlir(imt 1'1111fornin 14u fupbt)mrut I11+. .1pprall. 1W. n1111 JIM IIUI dr11•rnllnr tnr►its. 11'estrrn Mr 111►itl) 127 1',tl.nwi. Utll, t+i t'.A:.'.,1 ZI, Ulwo Inv. is. sottlrtlki 1111M) 12 ('nl.11plr. TOM Ivirrl'A Jn+IK1111v11 thtltiuw will 11( i1D, fill 1'..1.211.71M). itinudnrr to tvtlultrl direrhir isf agrirulttluu lhuvi thAt letter ttilscha►chir rruler typ• In sort A>+hle I+i• drrl•iun relisMlss: prthinri• i.t rh•rk itt office of utimot vlork Mult•d e-'a IiernMr us Alrr•rafr pliol in Inlrilll•Mr uI Ibnt .111, tt:i% gllill, fit fill-roudurt 1.4 rr• $IvAt villilrnl trAM ri'ver.r+l ultd 1•tiMt• to 1110.11w lrtiltlh• rerurav froln the fil±4 slul ulnndt,41 in trial 1111A wilh dilw•ti•.1v tit uu1t11ming nn,t 1trerrtinc Iherlt op varloul, remand rove Ili di►rutur fur purpu.r sit dulex. whertmv III lirurihlt before couttly 1 rr1•nnisidrriug the prnulty )1r,•0011rly 1111• visit Mt•r►he rniumlashill rsldrme Weis Ill- prised, where it was found Sitar some of trttdure+l only nK to srlsat look place on thu charges ngainm pettt(oni•r were nut Otte or the .Mfrs, 11141 Stott reitu(re :he 41111. 1 K+I)s)mrteil by tvisis re, %vionfirld ►. trirt t•sutrt of 11111trril all 111.prn( ft11m Ju:lc• 1.1ireclur of Agriculture liC, Cal. Stint Ar.ord+ng Mritinr tylil-i clerk writ fit opts.010.29('.A31"00. rltan:late. after rrvets,104 Ilia hiftmeut of I l'rocrodit+ft far rrvlew fir denial by room. Ihr Muprriur eourh lot tl'waml She nutter misoslancr nt erlrpnrr.Nor►r 1+r perlr;( rn fro Cite r-tnuii-klou fur re,ouul•lermlon, i finny a YA11111 ritthtM cf .hnrrhuhl,rM where tlivre %nu a Mit+iil itits it farts sur- MUUItt he rt'tttAnllMl to Mllperint IYtlltr for romAing rrin,tull of Ilse d+11•tmrnlr vu nil of Ilse dnil•s. Pratl 1, l.t1t Atutdrit 1"wtn- d sins aviJenidenz^utcrnn e w .u)glurt whether thrrr taK suhrinls• ty Civil 14erslre 1'olntalealou (21+141! ::UI t,�ullnirsluuer's fiudlup, rifiete court imprnperly deter- 11"d J,Il!S('..1.211 fl 1. � .�. iudI&A review; drelilolis of local 14renOes; 1m111110o; i filing; time; record; decllllan and parly deflned; or. dinunre or resolution 1 (a) Judicial review of any &vision of n local 2-gencv. other than trchool district, as 1':- term locsll agency Is defined In Section 54851 of the Government Code, nr of commission, board, officer or agent (it, -cof, may be had pursuant to Section 1004.5 of this rode only If the petition for writ of mandate pursunnt to such souvtion Is tiled ';Athin the time limits s1wcifled In this section. t f (b) Any such petition sl)ell be filed nut later than the: 00th day following the date on which the decision becomes final If there Is no provision for recoflslder ition of the decision In any applicable prole;. .inn of Any statute, charter, or Pule, for the purposes of this section, the e- cish'P Is final on the date it Is made. If there is such provision for reconsideratinn, the dec.::i-ltl is final fir the purposes of this sec- tion upon the exniratirn ei the perl-A during which such recot.sidera- tine can be soug,.i; provided, th::t If lrc•onsiderntion Is suught pursu- mit to any such provision the derision Is final for the purpose's of this ' :eetlon on the date that reconsideration is rejected. (c) The. comple1v rtv'oiri of Ihr llrt'x'crdings shall Ix- prepared by last! IIN-al t geliCy ill• itti 1'llllllllltitiltlll, 1N111"tt, offil'rl', 111' :Igcfll whil'11 matle the decision and shall be tlAircr('d to the 11011lnnc'r within W flays after he hits filett it w(•ittell rcl)u,'%i Mel-efur. The ;i►t'ill agency may re-cover from the petitioner Its actual costs for tinns-cribini; or otherwise preparing the record. Such record shall Include the ;'"an- . :ipt of tht• prcceeciillt;s, all ple idings, .1I1 ;Iollccs and irrders, any Proposed d-Liston by a hearing officer, the filial dec:iaior„ all admitted 674 1 t • 1 Title 1 WRIT OF MANDATE § 1094.6 � exhibits, all rejected exhibits in the possession of the local agency or its comrni.csion, toad, officer, or agent, all written evidence, and an; other papers in the rase. (d) If the petitioner files u req:--cal for Ihr record as s1wified in s;uhllivitiitttl (ri within 10 (lays ,fief the dale the decision i eromes (I- nnl as provided in sulAivisloli (b), tut' lino-' within which it Illeliliull pursuant to Section UY94.5 mity hr filed shall the extended to not later than the 30th day following the dute on wrirh the record is either personally delivered ornailed to the petitioner or his attorney of ree- ord, If he has one. (e) As used in this section, decision means adjudicatory admin- istrative decision made, after hearing, suspending, demoting, or dis- misshr; an officer or employee, revoking or denying an application for a permit or a license, or denying an application for any retire- ment:benefit or allowance. (f) In making a final decision as defined in subdiv:»lion (e), the local agency shall provide notice to the party that the time within t i:-hich judicial review must be sought Is governed by this section. As used In this subdivision, "party" means an officer or em- ployee who has bet:n suspended, demoted or dismissed; a person whose permit or license has been revoked or whose application for a permit or license has been denied"; or a person whose application for a retirement benefit or allowance has been denied. i (g) This section shall be applicable in a local agency only If the goverming board thereof adopts nn ordinance or resolution making this section applicable. If such ordinance or resolution is a'=opted, the provisions of this section shall prevail ovee any conflie ing provision In any otherwise applicable law relating to.he subject matter. tAdded by Staits.1976,c.276.p.581,1 1.) Forma Nee West's Callfurula Cwle Forms,C101 Procedurc. •• Library refertnm Adtnhtartrntive LAw pilot 1'ret•e.lure C.d.'t. i'mblie Administrative Bodies a.td C�7."2. 1'n.rrilttrc 193. Notes of 1h'eislons In peneril 1 that pnblle rmpinylnemt reldJons i.uanl Exhauillori of adralelstretive remedies 2 Ind rxrinxit•it Jurislirtlon to dl-il-rntine whelher till- mntnir liructiee %:harf:et were Jnrtilb.l: sad, in view of trnrbrrs' fiiluro t. In equal t.t exhnmxt their n.lnthtixttative rrinedlert [a uodrr thr It•Nl.l:t Act. trial court erreel In A-111,ul Is r,l's unlinirrili frerxtug tit granting writ of imamate to rampel simper- trarlier.' x:thiril." after brgiunhig of new• iuteuQrtu of dixtriri and othrrs to ralxr xrhimil xenr, wilily r•nunlel url;)lint i.•ns xalati.•x of rrriain trat•hers. Aina4nr Val- wvr.• priming, mrsuably wits iv* itufsir Ire :4w6nminrs 1•:ilmrRtilm Aawa %. lriwllll prariity ill viululiutt of till- ltuddl Art si• (107111 151 Cul.Ilptr. 721. 8,4 C.A.Jt -:il. 675 • REt6E FOR CITY COUNCI�AC`f ION Date Jttl y 26 MS- Sub n. 1tted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council �, Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Praperfid by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Servicesa . b � Subject: APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF TE T IVE TRACT NO. 122681CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 05-24/CO ITIOYAL EXCEPTION NO. 85=27/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-7 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84-34 Consistent Frith Council Policy? [)Q Ya [ l New Policy or Exception Stbtemant of Issue, Recemmendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Altoinative Actions,Atta&-inents: STATEMENT. OF ISSUE: � Transmitted for your consideration are t:iree appeals from the Mayor of Huntington Bench, the applicant, and concerned citizens of the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract No. 12268, Conditional Use Permit No. 85-24, Conditional Exception No, a5--27, Coastal Development Permit No. 85-7 and Negative Declaration 84-34. E The nature of ea^h appeal is discussed in the Analysis Section of ; this report. The Planning Commission 's approval limits the project to 192 units and a total of 60 bens for the convalescent/assisted care facility, includir-g 14,500 square feet of office/retail area. 1 RECOMMENDATION: i Planning Commission action and recommendation: .i ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY SC']UMACHER T'UE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12268 IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-24, C011DITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-27, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-71 AND NEGATIVE' DECLARATION NO. ; 84-34 -- 'PALM CIURT', BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE.- AYES: Livengood, Erskine, Schumacher , K rjahangir NOES: Rowe, Winchell ABSENT: Porter ABSTAINS None ANALYSIS: The three appeals which have been transmitted with regard to the 'Palm Court' proposal are quite broad in scope. Because of this scope, staff bel4.eves the total project is open for discussion. There are two threshold issues which the City Council may wish to discuss before entering into a review of specific development standards.* First, is the concept of senior-congregate care proper for this site? Secondly, is a mixed use product correct for this site? r P!0 Sim As previously stated, the Planning Commission conditioned the project to be 192 Units with an additional total 60 redo for the convalescent/assisted care facility including 14 ,500 square feet of office/retail area. The applicant 's request was for z three lot subdivision for the purpose of corstructIng 205 senior apartment units with 30 convalescent: units (60 beds) and 30 assisted care units (30 beds ) including 14,500 square feet of office/retail area. As part of the history of this site it should be noted thet on October 4 , 1984, the City Council adopted a Prec13N Plan of Street Alignment 84-2 establishing the street configuration of Atlanta/Lake/Orange connection in response to the circulation section of the Downtown SF --ific Plan, identifying this intersection as une needing further stuQy. As a result of the realignment and the vacation of Lrke Street, the propused project lies partly in the Oldtown specific Plan District II (87% of the site) and Downtown Specific Plan District VI (13% of the site - see cttached Site Plan, Exhibit 3) . District VI of the Specific Plan is an area intended to be a neighborhood-oriented shopping and uervice area with public gathering spots and is also intended to provide for residential developments in conjunction with those commercial activities. The Oldtown Specific Plan is primarily a ;esidential zone calling for low to medium density developments. Sine the project is divided into two zoning classifications the stall analyzes the project using a formula arrived at by taking a proportional percentage of the site area in relationship to those zoning designations. As an attachment the staff has provided a statistical breakdown of the project. A summary of the project as submitted (Exhibit 8) indicates that the applicant is requesting a 51% density bonus (aseuming 136 units permitted by code) ; relief from the parking standards of Article 979 (the applicant is requesting that the project be evaluated by senior residential standard parking standard, Article 924.5, of .6 spaces pPr unit) ; deviation from the 30 'oot height limit (Oldtown Specific Plan) . Access into the project will be from two locations: north end of Lake Street at Pecan Street and the intersection of Atlanta/Orange Avenues and Lake Street. Lake Street is designed as a secondary arterial with a 90 foot -ight-of--way with a 7 foot sidewalk capable of accommodating 15,000 to 20,000-25,000 vehicle trips per day. it is anticipated that summer beach-traffic will use Atlanta Av`nue. The appeal from the Mayor indicates that the 'Development is not consistent with the objectives of the Downtown Specific Flan and Redevelopment plan including but not limited to parking, density, bulk , height and circulation. " The sta-Ef and the Planning Commission have had similar concerns with the project as i demonstrated in the ultimate action taken by the Planning Commission. RcA - July 26, 1985 -2- (2908d) a Issue 1 - Parkin: The applicant is seeking relief from Article 979 J PFFRI nc_t Requirement) and requesting that the residential portion of the project be evaluated by the senior Residential Standards of . 6 parking spaces per unit. Both the staff and Planning Commission concur (as indicated in conditions of approval 1 A-F) that the parking ratio needs to be increased to avoid future negative impacts on the surrounding community as well as the project residents. Furthcr, the applicant has indicated that the project is designed for af-fluent 'active retired' residents. Staff believes this type of renter profile lends itself to a higher ratio of automobile ownership. Issue 2 - Density: The Planning Commission, in their approved action, re uce a number of apartment units from 205 to 192 at the July 2, 1985 meeting. This provides a density bonus of 41% over the permitted density. During the public nearing, staff suggested that the Planning Commission explore the possibility of 18.2' apartment units which would reduce the concerns related tt� height, parking and building sulk even further. Howevnr, this suggesta.on was not acted ►-pon by the Planning commission. Bulk - The City Council may explore a further reduction in the numTzer of apartment units to minimize the building bulk as suggested by staff at the Planning Conmission meeting. A 182 unit development would provide the project with a 34% density bonus. Height - The Planning Commission 's approval of 1512 units included 1'ower ng the height from 45 feet to 30 feet for a portion of the project adjacent to the single family homes along Alabama. A further reduction of ten units from the third floor in the Oldtown area could reduce the impact of the development into the existing single family tract to the east. The secoad aspect of the Mayor 's appeal is that "the applicant has not demonstrated that there will be an economic benefit to the Downtown through the development of this project. ' Staff has attached for the City Council 's review (Attachment 4 ) the applicant's economic projection and profile for Palm Ccurt as it relates to the Downtown area. The applicant 's appeal (Exhibit 5 ) is centered around the conditions of approval. It specifically states, 'The conditions as written will not permit the development of the parcel per applicable local land use regulations and adopted City policies and standards which have been applied to other developments'. Staff believes this is an erroneous statement because the project as submitted does not ccmply with several development standards without benefit of a variance. In discussions with the applicant, they have indicated a concern with a reduction in number of beds from 90 to 60 !or the convalescent-assisted care facility. They have also taken exception with the Planning Commission 's elimination of 13 apartment units. RCA - July 26, 1985 -3- (2908d) With respect to the rormer issue, the staff and Planning Commission believe that a 90 bed convalescent-assisted care facility is not justified as being an anciliary use to the apartment project. To date, adequate documentation has not beet presented to. alter this position. The latter issue (reduction of number of units) is central to the project because it ultimately influ .nces every other aspect of the development. When the number of units in the project are reduced, inpacts on adjacent properties to the east are reduced. Staff has prepared two exhibits, one illustrating the project with 192 units, the other with 182 apartment units. Theet will be displayed during the meeting for the City council 's review. The third appeal is from'property owners along Alabama Avenue. Their concer:,s are similar to the ones raised in Mayor 's appeal letter. As previously stated, the staff and Planning Commission � believe that the issue related to parking is minimized with a reduction in units And the following condition placed on the project by the Planning Commission: 1 . The Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations dated .Tune 10, 1985 � shall be modified to include the items listed below, then resubmitted subject to review and approval by the Director of ' Development Services which reflects: a. A parking ratio for the apartment units of ' 1 space/studio and 1 bedroom units 2 spaces/2 bedroom units f{ As an alternative, prior to issuance of building permits the applicant/developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Huntington Beach (to be reviewed by the pity Attorney's office as to form and content) which will commit the developer/applicant to fund the cost of a parking study (administered by City Staff) at 90% occupancy of the 192 apartment units. Said study will be used as a decision making tool to determine the amount of financial participation (if any) the developer/applicant will have toward a public parking facility up to the difference between the number of spaces proposed at.d the number of spaces required by code. An annual review shall be conducted thereafter to determine any future participation subject to ! ' the discretion of the Director of Development services. I i b. A fully dimensioned plan reflecting compliance with open � space requirements. j c. Turning radius of 27 feet for retail parking areas. d. A total of 60 beds for the convalescent ^are facility. RCA - July 26, 1985 -4- (2908d) e. A Lntal of 192 senior apartment units. f. The number and location of a31 trash bins. g, The elimination of all office nquare footaC a above the commercial. In addition to the Tentative Tract, Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Exception and Negative Declara :ion, there is a coastal development permit pending on the Palm Court project. The CV.yof Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program han been certifiedby the City and California Coastal Commiss%on. A Coastal Development Permit (CDP) is required for any develop-vent other than exempt projects within the coastal zone and is an area designated as "non appealable". These projects are not appealable the Coastal ' I Cc-mmission. The City Council may approve or ccnditionu lly approve the coastal de,%elo;ment permit after making the f;nding outlined in the July 2, 1985 staff report. ENVIR014MGNTAL STATUS: On May 25, 1985, Draft Negative Declaration No. 84-34 was posted for a 14-day review period in a newspaper of general circulation, no comments either verbal or written were received, the staff is recommending approval of Negative Declaration No. 84•-31 prior to any � action on the request for e»titlement. FUNDING SOURCE s Should theprojvot be approved through the appeal process, the applicant has indicated a desire to request the participation of the ! Redevelopment Agency in tax exempt financing for the project. such t a financing would be structured aa, a "Certificate of Participation," through Which the Redevelopment Agency would acquire the project from thu developer and simultaneously sell the project to the developer. The developer pledges to make installment payments to the Redevelopment Agency, and, the Agency in turn, pledges the revenue stream as debt service payments Lo the Trustee on behalf of the certificate owners. Basic authority for such a financing is similar to that used in providing tax exempt financing for a number of apartment projects in the city. It's important to note that the provision of financing is an issue separate frna consideration of the entitlement to use for the project. Any participation by the city or Redevelopment Agency in such financing will be the subject of a public hearing and require subsequent specific actions by Council and Agency (anticipated amount of such j% financing is $2t,,000,000 and a one-half of one percent irsuance fee will be aesessed) . RCA - July 26, 1985 -5- (2908d) I A.LTERNATiVE ACTION: The City Council may consider one of two alternative actions: modify the Palm Court Project by reducing the number of units thus minimizSr•g the related issues raised by the Mayor and concerned residents in their appeal letters. The City Council may also consider overturning the Planning Commission's upprov41 and deny the project based on the issues raised at the public hearings and with the findings outlined in the attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report dated July 2, 1985 with attachments 2. Plenning Commission meeting minutes dated July 2, 1985 3. District site plan 4. Applicants ecunomic analysi6 5. Applicant's letter of appeal with new information 6. Mayor P.•..iley'oa appeal 7. *wetter from concerned residents S. Statistical breakdown JWP:HZ:kla 2- RCA - July 26, 1985 -6- (2908d) 1 ' 1 '7 f i ATTACHMENT 1 i I*nC,) Udi"nl f i - �6 /e. �eclarAR 10n QYar 1 . • (e 's �"r � c-Q.,,Y /-- 7'd a.+�.�,; Aga•.... Li,me CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION • • • • TO City Council Members FROM Ruth S. Bailey, Attention: City C!erk Mayor SUBJECT APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DATE July ll, 1985 APPROVAL OF CUP 85-241 TENTATIVE TRACT 12268, CE 140. 85-27! COASTAL .. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT W7/NEDATIVE a DECLARATION NO. 84-34 r',. �� 1 Please accept this memorandum %wt an appeal to the planning Commisswr's app of CUP 85-24, Tentative Tract No. 12268, Conditional exception No. 85-270 COBB Development Permit No. 85 7, and Negative Declaration No. 84-34, (BWC/Ven�rV�odIs Palm court Project located within the Town Square subarea of the Main-Pier � Redevelopment Project Area), for the following reasons: i, A. Development is not consistent with the objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan and the Redevelopment Plan I including, but not limited to: ) parking i derslty bulk i height circus.Lion i S. The applicant has not demonstrated that there vnt11 bean ecomomic benefit to the Downtown through the development of this project. i RSB r1p i I I, 4 r , RECt:IVF� C11Y CtUr, Ct1Y V 11LUTI GICI ht'tcW•0,0r. in IZ 3 r) July 111 1985 Huntington Beach City Council Huntington Teach, California 92648 i � Dear Council Members: We wish to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission on July 2, 1985, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 85 24, Tentative Tract No. 722691 Conditional Exception No. 98 -27, Coastal Dmvelopment Permit 85•-7, and Negattve Declaration No. 94-34. , . Our appeal is based an the following problems ,I 1) A 41% density bonus over the specific plan for Old Town. 2) Inadequate parking facilities for residents, i employees, and vi*ltors, impacting negatively an the Old Town community. 3) Height variances which negatively affect adjacent property values. i We have the approval of the following resident of our community to include their names as concurring and supporting this appeal : Mr. & Mrs. R. Conrad Mr. & Mrs. D. Goode Mr. to Mrs. T. Jacobs Mr. ce Mrs. J. Pratto Mr. & Mrs. D. Slaven i r Sincerely, i Kenneth and Mary Rose Skollyan f 121 Alabama Street Muntinyton Beach, CA 92648 Enc. Check in amount of $165.00 cc: Planning Commission Mr. & Mrs. R. Conrad Mr. & Mrs. D. Goode j Mr. & Mrs. T. Jacobs j Mr. I- Mrs. J. Pratto t Mr. & Mrs. D. Slaven t O.T.H.A. File i. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 20M MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK July 17, 1985 j Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Skolyan � 121 Alabama Street r ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Skolyan: The appeal that you filed will be heard Tuesday, August 6, 1985 rather than on Monday, August 5, 1985, as the Council will not meet on August 5. You will receive a formal notification at a later date. 7 Please contact the Development Services Department if you have any questions - 536-5271. ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, CITY CLERK BY: i Connie Brockway, Deputy(-" cc: Jim Palin, Development Services Director 't I I 1 f 1 r I T04phont:714-536-52271 1.• . . .. ... .. .:...�.. . t I J i—�rry . r,4A) B W C / VAN D ERWOOD COMPANY 615 South Flower Street, Suite 1201 Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 624-1001 July 12, 1985 I c� f? -� ' T. ,men Mr. James W. Paling Secretary Huntington Beach Planning ~' Commission P.G. Box 190 j Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i Dear Mr. Palin: BWC/Vanderwood hc.Leby appeals the Planning Commission's action of July 2, 1985 on Conditional Use Permit No. e5•-24/Tentative Tract No. 12268/Conditional Exception No. 85-27/Coastal Development Permit No. 65-7/Negative Declaration No. 84-14 for the Palm Court development and all velated actions. The conditions as written W .1 not permit the j development of the parcel per applicaale local land use regulations and adopted City policies and standards which have been applied to other developments. We earnestly request an appeal hearing as soon as possible and enclt, :•� our check no. 123 in the amount of $165.00 ?n payment of .,,a appeal fee. Sincerely, ` ANTHONY CAN7,ONERI Managing Partner AC:ms Enclosure �a 5-N B W C / V AND E R W O O D C O M P ANY 615 South Flower Street, Suite 1201 Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 624-1001 July 12, 1985 - --an - Mr. James W. Palin -�.��,W Secretary Huntington Beach Planning Commission ` P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Palin: EWC/Vanderwood hereby appeals the Planning Commission's action of July 2, 1985 on Co; .ii#;onal Use Permit No. 85-•2�/Tentafiive Tract No. 12268/Conditional Exception No. 85-27/Coastal Development Permit No. 85-7/Negative Declaration No. 84-34 for the Palm Court development an3 all related actions. The conditions as written will not permit the development of the parcel per applicable local land use regulations and adopted City policies and standards which have :-pen applied to other developments. We earnestly request an appeal hearing as soon as possible and enclose our check no. 123 in the amount of $165.00 in payment of the appeal fee. Sincerely, J ANTHONY CANZONERI f Managing Partner AC:ms Enclosure t ROBERT PHILIP AFP ATTORNCY AT LAW B11 CIVIC CCNTCR DFZIV(. WC3T f SUITL 200 1 SANIVA ANA. CALIFORNIA U:-'?OI r 17141 072.92Cs3 ;�� �1el� July 30, 1985 +. Clerk of the City Council City of Huntington Beach ', Huntington Beach, Ca. Res Entitlement Request # 12268 (Coed. Use # 85-24, Cond. Exc. # 85-27, Coastal Dev. # 85-7, Neg. Declar. # 84-34) To the Hon. Clerk, and Members, of the Huntington Beach City Councils The above identified matter; dealing with the develop- ment of former Santa Fe-Southern Pacific property, is on tonigk,�'s Council agenda pursuant, I understhnd, to several appeals of the approval of development plane granted by the Planning Commission. Thin letter is not intended to address the merits of the development itself, a matter on which the Council has had much input, but is rather only to apprise the Council of one matter of which it may not yet be aware. We address the Council in this manner at the suggestion of a member of the Commission str.Up with whom we were put in contact by the City Attorney's office. I, along with attorney Clarence E. Hay,iee, a H.B. reuident, represent Mr. and Mrs. 'Don Goode, who reside on and own several adjacent lots at 219 Alabama, property adjoining that which is the subject of this development. M r. and M re. Goode have been using, and have developed, a 20 by 100 foot stretch of this property, adjacent to and now for all intents and purposes part of their property, for at least the past five years. They have paid all taxes impo- ed on their ad- joining props rti.es, as defined in the subdi% ..aion maps Gled for this area, during that time. In addition, they have regularly used, and protected by a locked gate, a path across the railroad property, from Lake St. tn the rear of their property, to gain accesu to it. The r .-toad has been ac- tually aware of these usages for at least the past several months, and, I am informed, probably since sometime it, 1979. These usages may or may not give Mr. and Mrs. Goode title by adverse possession to the property adjoining theirs, and a prescriptive easement (or the right to continued use) to the path from Lake St. we have been in contact with, and have met with, both an attorney and a realtor for S.F.-S.P. Corporation, but as yet have been unable %*:a resolve this matter. We are now awaiting additional information from the i f f • it R013ERT PHILIP APP ' ATTORNCV At LAW railroads' holding company as to their assessment of the value of either this property, or its use, before further negotiations can take place. Absent some amicable resolu- tion, Mr. Haynes and myself have been retained to prosecute or defend whatever litigation maf arise. We felt it incumbent on ourselves to advise the Council that while title of record to this parcel appears to be in the holding company, that there is some - we believe - sub- stantial dispute concerning actual title to at least a por- tion of itt given what we understand to be a fairly tight mBergin of density and parking allowances for the development. this 2000 square feet may be relevant to those computations. We do not intend, and are not attempting, to impede the railroads' development of this area in any manner which this Council approves, with the single exception of the pro2erty to which we believe our clients have acquired title during } tha years when either the railroad, or the 'Huntington Beach Co., allowed the property to lie abandoned. As to that property, we felt it necessary to advise the Council of the + pending dispute in order to fully prote-t whatever rights our c2tents may have in this matter. Yf we may provide any } further information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you for your consideration. Y R �ul l ' R 'P. Appr and C r» Clarence E. Haynes by Robert P. App Attorneys for Mr. and Mra. Don Goode 1 t fool) f huntington beach development services department f STAff JREPORT. i T0: Planning Commission ` FROM: Development Services DATE: July 2, 1985 : SUBJECT: CONDITIONAIQSE PERMIT NO. 85-24/TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12268/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION HO. 85-27/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-7/NEGATIVE DECLAPATIO14 {� No. 84--34 - "PALM COURT" On June 18, 1985 the Planning Commission continued the subject applications with the developer 's consent due to the 16ngth of the agenda and to allow time for a meeting between the applicant and concerned property owners. Staff has revised the findings and conditions of approval as. diucunsed at the Planning Commission meeting and outlined in this report. Further, Staff has prepared an alternative action for denial with findings and a modified statistical analysis of the project for the Planning Commission 's review and consideration. RECOMPIENDAIIIOD: 1 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approv , Conditional Use Permit No. 65-24 , Tentative Tract No. 12268 with Conditional Exception No. 85-27 and Coastal Development Permit No. 85-7 after f adopting Negative Declaration No. 85-18 based on the findings and ` conditions outlined in the June 18, 1905 Staff Report with the following .amendments: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 85-24: f� 1 . The proposed mixed use development consisting of 205 I apartment units with a total of 60-beds for both the convalescent and ans s► ed care facility having a 51% density bonus and 16, 900 square feet of office/retail area it compatible with surrounding land uses and is in conformance. with the Ceneral Plan policies because thu proposed improvements are ponsistent with the intent of Downtown Specific Plan and Oldtown Specific Plan. 2. The proposed mixed use development consisting of 205 apartmr.►:t units with a total of 60-beds for botil the convalescent and assisted care facility having a 51% density bonus and 16f900 square feet of office/retail area will not be detrimental to' the general health, welfare, safety and 1. am Awftw OEM } fM 22A b� i EXHIBIT NO. l convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood because the project will be in compliance with the regulations set forth in the Ordinance Code as approved by the Planning Commission. 3. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed development does -properly adapt the structures to streets , driveways, and other uses in a harmonious manner. Lake and Atlanta Avenues, 'being a primary means of access, are major arterials and have sufficient capacity to accommodate project-generated traffic. REVISED FINDING FOR APPROVAL CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-27 T: 1 . The granting of the Conditional Exception for deviation in the height limit of 30 feet will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent upon other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zcnie classification. The project will mpintain a 30 foot height limit for the portion of the building adjacent to the Oldtown District , REVISED CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL CONDITIONAL US4 PERI1IT NO. 85-24 : 1 . The applicant shall submit a revised site plan to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Development Services which reflects: C. As an alternative, prior to issuance of building . permits the applicant/developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Huntington Beach (to be reviewed by the City Attorney 's office as to form and content ) which will commit the developer/applicant to fund the cost of a parking study (administered by City Staff) at 90% occupancy of the 205 apartment units. Said study will be used as a decision making tool to determine the amount of financial participation ( if any) the dev.loper/applicant will have toward a public parking facility. An annual review shall be conducted thereafter to determine any future participation subject to the discretion of. the Director of Development Service,. '1 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, a dopy of t;.e guidelines for tenant occupancy shall be submitted to the � Department of Development Services and reviewed by the City Attorneys office- as to form and content . It shall include provisions for: establishing the minimum age reguirer.•ents (55 years) , prohibiting persons fvom residing in the convalescent care/assisted care facility without first being a tenant of 4he apartment project for a miniaim of six months or have a lease to that effect. ) Staff Report - 7/2/85 -2-- (2777d ) �I • I I I 4. Orange Avenue/Atlanta Avenue shall be constructed as a 100 foot primary arterial highway with a 14 foot wide• raised median and 8 foot wide sidewalks . 5. Lake St,:eet is to. be dedicated and shall be 90 feet wide with 7 foot wide sidewalks ana a 14 foot wide raised median. 5a. Pecan Avenue shall be dedicated to Public Works standards. G. Vacation proceedifigs will be initiated by the City of Huntington Beach for the vacation of Chicago Avenue (Gross Avenue) and a portion of Lake Street. Tile remaining portion of Chicago Avenue (Gross Avenue) between Lot 1 (Block 301 ) and Lot 17 (Block 201 ) of the Vista Del Mar Tract shalf� be cul-de-saced to Public Works standards. a. omit this condition. 9 . Patterned concrete within public right-of--way shall be limited to locat:oas and design established in the Downtown Design Manual . 14. Omit this condition. 20. Omit this condition. 28. All utructures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall he constructed in compliance with the state acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 45 CNEL, contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for a building permit. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: REVISED FINDINGS F'OR D_ENI�L C014DITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85--24 : 1 . There is limited bn-site parking being proposed to support the mixed use development consisting of 205-unit apartment project (51% density bonus ) in conjunction with 60 convalescent/assisted care units, and 16,900 square feet of retdii/office area . Further, there are no plans for a public parking fagility in the immediate area to relieve the negative impacts. • Because of this, surrounding properties will be adversely-.impacted by the mixed use development. 2. The location and site layout of the proposed use does not properly adapt the' structure to streets, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. The ordinance code allows for a *maximum of .136 apartment units with an additional 25% density bonus, the applicant 's request far exceeds the maximum development standards. Staff Report - 7/2/A5 -3-- (2777d) 0 I W 3. The combination and relationship of one pvoposed use to another on site are not properly integrated. There. is an excess of convalescent-assisted care beds to apartment units. The recycling of the senior apartment units to regular apartment units could not be supported by the number Iof parking spaces• availible. ATTACHMENT: 1 . Updated Statistical Matrix , 2. Submittal by applicant 3. Staff Report dated June 18, 1985 with attachments. JWP:HZ:k1a 1! 1 i Staff Report - 7/2/05 --4- (2777d) I 1! II I 1 i DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PALM COURT :, SENIOR ISSUES OI,DTOWII DOWNTOWN TOTAL PROPOSAL STANDARD t of area 87% : 13% 100% Gross acres 5.76 .86 6.62 Pet acres 4 .20 . 64 4 .92 Minimum f` Parcel Size (sq. ft. ) 21500 10,000 101000 288, 367 10,000 Max Density (du's) 115 21 136 205 base district- with 51% density+bonus density ./low mod • bonus income li Max Intensity (F'.A.R. ) (sq,ft. ) 279,654 72,135 351,789 213, 855 None Max 6uiJding Height N 4 story 30 ' 451 * base district Max site Coverage 50€ Nona 50% 49-50% base district 107,157 + 10% • sq.ft. Setbacks Front 15 ' 15 ' 15 ' 15 ' base district Side Rear 10, .3 ' 10 ' 40 ' Upper Story None 25•' w/2nd 25+ * None story ' offset 10 ' Recreation 40% of 3,255 77,829 801000+ 60 - 1 bdrm. Space net site 120 - 2 bdrm. (sq.ft. ) 74,574 for rental projects Code permits a total of 136 apartment units plus 25% density bonus or 170 units. The convalescent/assisted care facility is in addition to this amount. i • ' Indicates Cond tional Exception is needed. f3V— Vander,,,,00ri PALM COURT PROJECT HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA 1 ISSUES AND ANSWERS At the June 18, Planning Commission Public Hearing, several important ssues were raised by Planning Commissioners and neighbors. This brief report will;'attempt to respond to each of these key issues. I . DENSITY The Palm Court project as su'mittsd, with 205 independent living units requires a 50% density bonus. This bonus is well within the authority of the Planning Commission based on the senior bonus legislation' implemented by the legislature last year, and is certainly well below the density permitted at other senior projects', approved and constructed in Huntington Beach. As indicated' by Commissioner Schumacher, the controlling issue here is intensity of population rather than unit. density. ' Existing zoning would. permit 136 .apartments on the site with no control regarding the number of bedrooms or unit size. By using an affordable housing bonus, the developer could increase the unit count to 170 - again with no control ` over unit size. The impact of 170 multiple bedroom rental units on this site in terms of requirements for services and most particularly traffic impacts would far exceed those that would be generated by the Palm Court project. 4( This project has already been reduced in terms . of its unit count from 279 dwelling units to 205 dwelling units . Any futher reduction in unit count will make the project. 1 infeasibld . 1' 2 . PARKING - There is no clear consensus in the City of Huntington Beach regarding an appropriate parking I standard for this type of housing. Staff has recently become concerned about the adequacy of the .6 spaces per unit standard applied to senior projects based on experience at several recently completed projects in the City. f;owever, these projects are of an entirely different type than is propopsed at.' Palm Court. They do not provide meal service, they do not provide van and limousine service, ' and they are located *in more isolated pact: of the city. , The Palm Court project, a congregate =are development, has vastly different parking requirements than Ilycliff Towers qr Emerald Cove. A survey of seven similar congregate facilities in California documents that the actual resident parking requirement is at a ratio of less than . 4 cars for each apartment unit (see attachment 1) . As is indicated in Attachment 2, the Palm Court project, designed to.' meet the Huntington Beach senior suffix. parking standard of .6 spaces per unit and other city parking code requirements for nursing and commercial uses, will provide a large margin of visitor parking. While the developers ' are absolutely confident that the A it h BWC/Vander wcod 2e7ej:pmenz Co. , June 14 , 1985 CAL::CR:t'A*CUIGR-GATE CARE PFC,;EC':S r:o. oE' Car-co .to. o� Resident Apart:�Enc Project City .Acr •"_mEnt� Ctrs Ratio t Ocean House Santa Monica 121 7 . 057,; Sierra Pasadena 216 49 . 226 t rl Bonita E �.. t illa Del Escondido 84 24 . 285 ey Villa Bel Napa ei 31 . 384 e V VIilla Del i merced 4 3: . ?40• j ey Ella Del Visalia 100 27 . 270 e 7 .. ills Laguna350 90 . 388 p' �alencia FiiLs ( ` Sanport Huntington 148 ? . 340 Beach (not yet built ) Palm Court Huntington 201; I i .600 Beach I i . I .fs t ATTACHMEN" WEEKDAY WEEX ND Ly SURPLUS SIMPLUS INDEPENDENT LIVING Senior Code requirement 205 enir_s at .6 spaces/unit = 123 spaces Actual requirements 205 units at . 4 spaces/unit = 82 spaces Surplus available for employees and visitors 41 spaces 41 spact•:. NURSING AND ASSISTED LIVING Code Requirement 90 beds at .3 spaces/bed = 27 spaces � Requirement for residei.ts = 0 spaces Surplus available for employees and visitors 27 spaces 2: spaet_•c, EMPLOYEE PARKING Code Requirement not specified Actual requirement for 49 weekday and 11 weekend employees at .5 spaces/employee 25 Surplus available for employees and visitors 0 19 COMMERCIAL Code requirement at 5 spaces / 1000 sq. ft . - 73 Actual requirement - 73 Surplus available for employees anti visitors = 0 31) "gtal Additional Available spaces 15 15 15 ` • -plus available for Employee and Visitors 83 .~ 132 f BWC/Vanderwood parking requirements cif all of the project's components ran be met on lice, they have ageed to accept th6 condition suggested by City staff; that the City inspect the projects's actual parking needs on a periodic basis, and if there i.s a documented deficiency, the developers will agree . to participate in a City Parking Authority off-site 'parking structure. 3. DESIGN - The Location of the Pala Court project. places it at a critical seam between downtown and the medium density residential neighborhood to the east. In fact, the project is actually in two separate zoning districts. In response, the project designer has (leveloped � a building which has two distinct and different facades. The western face of the building is quite formal and conforms rigorously to .the City's downtown design standards. It represents a landa►ark quality building that will demark the edge of the newly emerging downtown Main Pier development. The eastern facade en the other hand is at least a full story lower than the rest of the building and is designed in a much less formal, multi-family. configuration. Views toward the ocean from many adjacent` Alabama Street properties are not interrupted since the commercial portion of the project is only one story high rather than the three stories permitted by code. Moreover, 1 at no paint is the building closer than 40' to the property , line of residential neighbors, and much of the building i 1 is more than 80 ' disiant from the residences on Alabama Street. 1 CUP conditions which mandate careful design, Mediterranean appearaAce, full articulation, and ample landscaping will make- Palm Court a good neighbor that does credit both to downtown and to its residential neighbors. . 6/26/85 dhm • �r., 'C.�.�!•�"'��` '•"+ ;.4 'x` t'VY}` +' ,r• �,�y �.rf.,,_, '�.f'ir'. *F,�.�y'u,;..�P�`�kT,�i�jM{+trt•��•�'�"k�"y�•S4."�'.(7�t�'ir'ti^y'�;/V �','1�•.}�''�`,. ",��ri,�•��..„�. � YP a'rt� �4@ t�I�t�,�� k� e• s 1 1'A'� �r{ r.,.y r '�1' .! 'r�,'!d< t ail• 7V,t�4• � �h� r„ 1,�• �.'I 1 jv�r'!'�j ,;4:�,�;1` ,r., rr�i•'�Ri.'k1�'i.�'y�� •1;t1' �,t:,!/ AI�..(;4 t.+, �ti ��t + A,'�+v(0' 3"J, 1{ i. .rtr r ,af w`.{ � {.9. S•r�; r•,t1�' I a�. .,�1':::5"1,,Fli,'�1•E•+'f,1(�•,`'t. r7 "{+'f '"t.C:• '�.'(' ,S' 'jj �r.tr+{.. ,f t,.5,4.'C: 1�' r � °+4 's'tlr ;�?,�r�.1-{',,�•a)t'i ,..11r` j•;•,rr. ,t %;;'1t, ':i:•�':'%''�'"•�I• ��:�'"T," rS;istr' 5, ,? ' ;,,• ':�. r„•l,• .,t •+I;:d'y+,�f,t�f. ,.:�.5 .1 �^f4�Y' 'n4w14}"1111..�t�...f}�'� .r.�•'3��:!•rv.'l'1,�'*n1.1.�.•� :A.i .7.` '•r'a l. ',)�I•�}It�,'.�.,If!rar r, ,;. At vq�i'+j.t1 V: L �t rv� i4A!6'q. ".:P"y,•�.; �: t. .t., r;A'.,•,p,�•.S tr l4w,r ^l.l. .ti,,�,., T'.. '(, A� J •n, �I:,,..r •� rt �•' .S,ir j� rr,.l.i•.��1.J.r�.t.R'' .� ^,'.•.. �,y, r•�• !r,, .Y, ,i. ,! y', V t ,r ,,Y, ,�',• „� S �, �: {`�, tl`, 1' :r. r' � •,1 � j• �1, 4 ! r �� t t !r � •r. ,4 •tr a L .r i�„}^�a, , l .Y ,1t,Sri ',pr r.i' ,' r 4�V"+ti t C ��','^� '+r., ta• .Yi• Ir ,+ 11 !„ .:.• 5r•�'.,`a °1I�t'i+r.,t� ,ah�.:.4? ;tl. r.h 'i+`� fy. 1 r ,v ;�'�,� (,,.,:.'�'' .' . ;tr'r i�.,, ?5 4'.r',.�J•!}, `�^ '. t 1'f r r\t .,�. y{,.5,x,'ti,.•1,Y.. r '., p�n,y� ,i •s :r.f• �, k�{v l' ,,'l�• � S. {rh1 It ,� ,�' f I;�r �.! !!;'4'' b ;'�'�W'�,' i'�".pi •''bY,!• 'r•T`4:a +i,`'�'!�''+i�'''t S.• ��}j�'.''•'r', )'1�'t` rV� '!1��"t�'+:„+ a,.'?,�;,{r,a1j4; � �r. Ir Y�, �' �Y.riJ�'i.`l,,"')+�A, k�,''.';t•,' �.- ,.t w .i. I,y�.� 4 5 � .t � ,I � r'S.. �. 7F,,r. h :tir ,�, ..1:,i;" + � `A,,`a�r4,i �,��:1. rt � 1 L• •t•, �1t 1 'S ,l ;t "!t, irf; t r '.� ;+• ,i !:,' r , .r�V`�.;�` ,i ly! r,�. � � t. ,{ " i. '!r I ti 't rr?;•.' i 'l'! (Y;\. ,r •4 '�,'S' f' rtt I �4 r iyw ,r �( ,. �:r �". •; i t •)r,yi.b,�� �� ,11,rh��Y�,+t:1 ';,^« V ,y'4 1. .,_y�l.r•Sy ',r. r , �,+ .•+,r�s 't4.•'f. .�� r''�,5, ,�, a'.r� .t�,..r,'�. .+ ` oy, y r ,t .4''�,!Ll r'�.,'F";• t�'i'4: `rl'', .1...�,__�l..i�._v,..-......,,.....-.1.._...t..�_._ I ' t' _..........r..r� 141_..... �. �••.. ._—..» ,r I ,• .,.,......._._...,...,... ...-.._.....�[Y..1r, t 1 a��• �1 •�'.'1�'••�:rV� '+ huntington beach developrro-at services department 4 I %y LIT. .. r ing Comm HYP 96Xg yg,,yb85Servi°es i SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PEW-111' r1o. 85-2,1/MITATIVE TRACT NO. 12268/CONDI:'IONAL EXCEPT10:1 00. 85-27/COASTAI, DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 140. 85-7/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84-34 - "PALM COURT" On June 4 , 1985 tho Planning Commission continued the subject: a applications at the request of the developer to allow time for 1 revisions to the plans as outlined in the attached staff report. Since that time , the staff has met with the applicant to work out modifications to the plane . We have received sketches and a revised site plan which reflect the following: ' 1 . The closing of the .second entrance leading into the 2-bedroom unit. 2. Reduction in overall building height by 3 feet - 45 feet at the highest point . 3. Elimin-ation of compact parking spaces from the project . 4 . Reduction in site coverage to meet ordinance code � 1 requirements. 5. Modification of balcony size in I bedroom units to comply with code. The staff can endorse the . "Palm Court " project provided that the applicant further revise t'he plans to reflect an increase in the parking ratio. Recentl,,, we have become aware of increased parking problems in the downtown Brea . Coupled with this is a realisation that the parking standard for senior citizen projects is not adequate. Unless the: applicant can demonstrate differently ( to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission ) , Staff is suggesting parking ratio as follows: I 1 space for each studio/l bedroom unit 2 spaces - for each 2bedrooin units This ratio Would yield an additional Ill parking spaces -for the project using the formula outlined in the Jane 4 , 1985 staff report: . Total Palm Court Parking 263 spaces tl C_ S .r A-f M•2]A Q 1 r �;� r h e � r�"�(. \�' S;Tt{r`rp� °'Tx••rd"4 't'•{. �I i thy,h° •+.� �'' � i •�•�('•'. ,a i. .,+r1� hS� I 1 i t t, �yt•11 1 5 t. '' a`1C•u4 {��� ,�`i�,. :'E''• ;��; ! 5 f,.w� d,{r i'� r+ .j.'fL'+'1�>f•' •�„ N' �, �`• : s+r��., ri I ��tylt' Y � �` � 1� 4� �cti� ;�.�:t;�i-i• t...�rR•� 1 ��i',{,f 'f ,.! .4,' I� �;+��" .�1', �'4v�• ��' `;�;•�.r-yt �. t� �yy��' •� tF'' 7,i• '��°la ��f� a•�,�'� 'f>�,t, '� i�:.1•� 0r`,t.�rT:'�, �I`'�`[ l�y, '� � ,� } M II W'�'.' `� ""'�y � b7A�•,,��, 1. �^r'�' t� ,�,'µ ��• a'r�.,�!� �'�'V;fIMr.�• !r r�i !1,A�; �.ti"s{���4•�.�i,�',+�,tqq ,J,C•�,' .":ILV','M1i� y •,�i��i •I I .�'s•,k. i:s;':4.:��. y ,�, o I •�Ft��Av�.(, '�'., :� ..i .� !f! r k 1 r.,,� (r. ''�{r1,l ri'�,, F � �{,a V,�,. 7 Y'+, �' � , i�'.1' �'kr a�,F yk .. f M :v' ' 1 Y' � �� f tC <:,,•V,�' tr�t4.{ f.•slt 7 '•.,�.� �'1.11•f,,,r- ytr�t,f:;,,!°5;., t' ,`� .�.li.r:• dY.ti.l��;t.. tl;..;l:(Ix a�a .ti ,.'} �t1 H,, I'n 1 1�•�� i �, , i +� r•,'3 ,: �}�t ` 1ti f. S. i,+' °• a �� f`�i'• `£'u�'�t�'E•' '�r'h� r�•t t1{• t� �M '�':�., ,r�,11��,.��L��• !•'�� 'Ii �'1l,fiM t •.v1�n., y"�Jt.� 1,S�.If�Y•� .r'.�,f� 'r.et �,.•) �A,�t f,.a +1^S.L;yA'aaa"L ' tl S , e!•,er. `.�: r 'e 1•.,. •i a ?;.�. l':• � t •,, iil .s;5'., nS4'ail d' �•.. 1"_—`_ �'1 atilt•'�+1�-:f.1.L[:i.rra:l.,:in'.Y.�..r..:11.Lti1 `,.t,...fii•��j+ri.lic,�.-�/Iti �,ap s:• ..l•• :� t I"�r..l,� � � 't:i '- t ;,I�:•��{;,;`.� L•.�.�iSy=-:JL...... --_.i1��;,rlw6a:L.iliwi la.Li�..r.�J�.�I LJi4.'1.°'/�"��� tr rSt,' I v i PALM COURT PROPOSAL Retail 14 ,500 square feet = 73 spaces required Office 2,400 square feet - 0 spaces required w Employee - 25 25 spaces required Convalescent: Nursing 60 beds 2( spaces (2 spaces per 3 beds) ' Assisted care 30 beds. - 10 spaces 136 spaces 263 Total spaces - 136 spaces = 127 spaces available for the apartment units -- approximately .6 spaL'?S per unit ratio STAFF PROPOSAL 1 The staff proposal would. have the following breakdown: 48 studio units and f27 1-bedroom units at 1 space per unit = 175 1 • 30 2-bedroom units at 2 spaces per unit = 60 Total spaces available to the apartment 235 project (an increase of 111 spaces ) Existing today in the City of Huntington Beach are five senior citizen projects. The staff researched these projects to determine � the approved parking ratio. Also, we contacted the property management firms for their opinions on the parking s'.tuations. Emerald Cove 108 spaces Maoa e 164 units p provided * g *gent (LOMCO) indicates that the weekend demand for 1/3 more guest parking ' Winward Cove 1 , 37 spaces/unit 96 units No parkinr problem Huntington Terrace 59' spaces with 55 units reciprocal parking Huntington Flest 1 space/3 units (5 Points Court ) provided Southwest Main/ Florida -- 162 units Not cc•nstructed Wycliff Towers Originally approved Tenants use parking Uji 4 spaces per unit surrounding propertic' '1 increasod to - :6 spaces per unit Staff Report - 6/18/85 ' -2-- (2693d ) A ' �Jy'�4�f ��•d4; �jl'' �1r'N'. "�� aI'1; �' !', Y} � I " a ., ,� 1J• '; ,4� I� '�•:l, ` :. �•.i '1J� + Y'• r ++ •nP r4 +� ri,�r f11 ,��J1,+IJ�j*`i;:'���s/� rjy,•'s...�{1. S• I' \ { t.. 1 j• + .w ,!„� �,'•i. .4„ {�:F{• �}';i :;;,. 1,a, !(++• ,.1.'!,ft y " ". '���' 1vl: I ,P Y. '{•, 4 .' y 11ji .ii,y.alI :t'` a 7 S y i5, f•'� :} �y 1r + 7rI,`,y�A[[ 1 a' ti A'' }pt .'4' IA' nf.�`t �'a"� t(y/+\ hl t���iS ...� 1"y\{ I •�4 ri .r: ��'jry�,�; it '�" •spr lil�I , �•;i.f!1� '�ti'r +'�{ �y �� �`�`� ,�: r,'�1 T^•�.� '•r��'�'�. ta`4� ,4' I�.NY}. 1..1�i \�','�(�J�,1ri-�1 :�� \� ii +� �1r' ' `, k,�•�t 4.R ,: S, 'ii j {, fwpp'; • V+.' ,yI; yy t{{ a+ e{ llr., { L.' :.T I"•1 i/ C 1 I P•� :�1�1� w,�9 .'� + .t, ,•; �K �, '�1 .y �!,1r�[ " ..`ii• ,,,2�y. ��'y.,i �,: ••'�'1. .i�:Y,`ii.:�'!:MTr1. �4' '+a��}',d, ,��• M�'i}�!v '"'i� ��: �.,..,�•Xy'1� ><.�5.',�st �'.,�r'F' ,.. .r,,l ,r� ,, �.. .r. j h 1 �• 1 r .., ,('. x;.,.+ ,,� t ,+,y• c\,� �'''sr ''� :!, v 1,�.tit7'.14. 't +•)�. ; �"'► t.' '1 h'�.,'r' 'k'r , r. •, '•,v +k 1 � '�"':; t�+ 1 , „y, ;t• ,�p�•7 :t�}t 'r fff^.•4,.�, t•,•;i• .�.,.. l�•+ �7•//."';':'F,�`.y 1,' R} 1', ,�. 6, i ,,y 1 :••ia+' Y.,� .( v'.•w' Y 'S, ;:v +1,'' t f.: �' •1' �vp `r ��•r;!7 .tit ,1.,',i11 ,4.'�, ,b'.j'1�:� �,,hs ;.4'�` •.�'sl-,'„„f a f.. y7.;!";, ,\. , ,,r�-, ; � � t' ,I• ,r ':rj , 1 ,_ 4.•t t, }•,,i,.l A;• ,i+1• cr.,ki��•�f'� :'�.�l�.t.r''1. � .,�;;v�.:. ,'.\:',r:r.l,:s,,.�jy y,rt ,�•.tiyyiikl ' l'..1�' .1. ..a:.,jx1.l. '':....�:: i. 1" 't' 1{' a Si�'�',� (. 1 .. .,. !•','I 1„ � !•` •�'=-� r..t�-7�.•.a:21a�i.ub✓.isRift'.r.L.a.'[.a .:.1.1..,1.1.: 'ta;��..i.1.a�i�,�'.++.t�..S.,►L1�i''i1 1�1i�i w In conjunction With this proposed to the •'' �^ ta suggesting that the bedroomcount forlthenconvalescenticaresbeff is limited to a maximum of 60. To date, staff has not received adequate documentation to justify 90 beds ( 30 2-bed nursing units and 30 assisted living units) as being an apartment project. ancillary use to the i" RECOMMENDATION: Subject to the recommended revisions and conditions of approval , staff endorses the approval Of Conditional Use Permit 140. 85-24t Tentative Tract No. 12208, Conditional Exception No. .85-27, Cbastal Development No. 85-7 and Negative Declaration No. 84-34 with the following findings. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL 'THITATIVE TRACT N0. 12208: 1 . The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type land use as well as ;.vetting forth objectives for the of implementation of this type of development:.. Therefore, the project as proposed complies with the City's General Plan of Land Use designation of Medium Density Residential . 2. The lct size, depth frontage, street width, and other design and implemen(ation features of the subdivision are and specifications on file with the C:'t well as in proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans compliance with the State Map Act and Citya Subdivisions FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-24 : • I � 1 • The proposed use is compatible with surrounding and is in conformance with the General Plan l land uses ' the proposed improvements are consistent with tie in because Downtown Specific Plan and Oldtown Specific Plane intent of 2• The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare,.' safet,- and cOnLenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood because the r in compliance with the regulations set forth inethewill be Ordinance Code as approved by the Planning Commission. 3. The- location, site layout , and design of the proposed development does drivewa r properly adapt the structures to streets Ys, and Other uses in a harrlonious manner. Lake lnd Atlanta Avenues, . being a primary means of access arterials and have sufficient capacity to accommodate ma3or project-generated traffic. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL CONDITIONAL LXCEPTION NO. 65-27: IJ 1 • The granting the height i of this Conditional Exception for deviation limit will not constitute a ,. n Privilege inconsistent upon other grant of: .ipecial properties in the vicinity �•° Staff Report - 6/18/85 , -3- (2693d ) — � � •� +gyp}?Q F `,i/�., •Q' Y�l e ;'h+. •f + '+ t� 4 r/ 1 K y ���%�41 r4.. t1tV �"t.r t. ,K �Y}I .Z• , tYf '.4 t'+5r {) I' j•' f`T+J� • �• { ' �'•� rLg ��- R � '+p1r{�' �r '�+�i, f P'• f��"' S 'iV�',1j5� �r1 ) y r •� t � `�1 y�.,'M� if�!ry9 tit. ,�' Ili +F"'ry�'i1 •►f`°.2;r rc,"y '� +Y..�,1. 1+ 71;n .4�+n i� t}i',�s+•1,�� ��1�t1��`P �'r y +55'� ;V .�1, '! T r S•. ,t'+ `;, ,i� �•+• e.L uy 1,r'+1 y� � e' . '}.. + r+� .,�5 p�i, f. r, i;7 h i.• s,� C .• �sti',I;,,'`,'' ,5.!. ?'S,:.:��' t� 5.71.: ,.[ .F•a •1','�# �. ;l.a. �+ ,f+ I +,,� 5+1„ 1+�+'� �;}`�t,,t 1 •tt, rt r++l{iR S+ �.} a ,i' 4 p TrS,fJJ(R�'f y (�•�•+i w!S 6• ) + n.1 LI4yr 1 Il',. 1! 'Ea +11R'"�", 1.,�� .rk e�.,�� • Y°:IS : ,,,,r,i r.�°�l n 4'f 5{r t, ` �.!",.r�+ �. t , ,i f.''i �� .� 1J�a�'. Jy, g , + 1 � Y {(3�y ti{ �'(i, e7;L , .��.L:�..1:.1...��•4� .+..:}1sr�::aw..� '1'.1. ::..Sii:�.1►,�«�i:�'.ci y '' ` ► 1::�..:.}�t: t''..�"Y1( r, .S•r• r .j and under an identical zone classification. The project will maintain a 30 foot. height limit for the portio. of theme building adjacent to the Oldtown District . 2. There are exceptlona3 circumstances which apptiy. to this property that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed on other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications because of the realignment of the street patt'eTr,. 3. Granting Conditional Exception No. 85--,17 will . not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property the EAM zone classifications because the.-. proposed will nat adversely impact surrounding property and is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Downtown Specific Plan District II and Oldtown Specific Plan, 4. Conditional Exception No. 85-27 is oonsist,:nt with the goals and policies of .the City 's General Plan and approval of Conditional Exception No. 85-27 will not result in any modification to -the requirements of the Coastal. Land Use Plan. r .FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-2: 1 . The- proposed mi.(ed use project is consistent with the city I Coastal Zone suffix and the Downtown Specific Plan Standard except as provided for in Conditional Exception No. 85-27 P! well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property; and conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the City 's Coastal Land Use Plan. 2. The proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that. is consistent with the Coastal Land USe Plan. 3. The proposed development conforms with the public: access and ' public recreaLior) policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act . SUG--ESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDIT.-OVAL USE PERMIT 85-15 : 1 . The applicant shall submit a revised site plan to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Development. Services which reflects : a. A parking ratio for the apartment units of - i 1 space/studio and 1 bedroom units i 2 ,paces/2 Bedroom units b. A fully dimensioned plan reflecting compliance with open space requirements. Staff Report -- 6/18/85 ` -4• ( 2693d ) I 11 .k AthYr '.tt. ?/W, 'i��'� �L Y. .l •' / 1 r.C'�. 'f�l'�i(f�'4^`�rr.� �r ,�1.{•,,5• ,ti•�, Y•�r� �1�t;,' '• +, 1,...;f (� !T f'};•�•,;ta:.{+'d',,. 4;• t��y, ��,' �g`t.%-j 1.A'�%';L�l�,)+�..7, f`�'' �. + ,ri^, 4: '1 • \I':��5' {. ,rY: t •A .1}' '�,/t7,' .,14, 7Y�i'r I, �1 h.11 !. f I. \ .1'F .'I;` r.6 1, T �t , 1M1 ,GY 7'�'{ q A•. A 1' y� Aj rY^.y 3i f. }� ,+ S :I ':,'1{�a1�"• \"i ;d '{il l+'r :411F tit� ..W,�;. 4� •$'{•(( .l .y SE• (,�'Y'f.i;'•t i�:v�!•f,f'•.(r.;'Ids„[p ,r I ,�it+ ;:+.• i�.} f t '�. �y �', ,1 1}J,I; , + !; .r' J l'. / y f, A @ .y i�l•'1 i"iy y,,• `Y.t i; 1 5 �.. t. 1 �1 '�i ( Y` �'` 'l l�a�l `,t K Y' ,.r'C'w:;r ,'.,,! �;�i !,1t: ,.111,� � �i, � .�x 'it, �%;l r � S�i't..1�,� d.. .'!{';,.1."tv�"f G, .' ;.,� ,: .,.�'�w'-1Y`�'v�,i',I b ''A. yr '��'1, f�.�Q '' ,5�,• ,y ,,8. .4� 1�, �'. ,qL,.r 1 a � r5•{, �.f'•.,;. 6f•i�`,�'.`{ .,(r.�ty,, I:['l..:a�r'i� 7ri i'yr''•,�',.t,;t 1�''�.i i.:aK.;ir�•`.�d} ,#'. I 4g?!1'�, i{]yf. .I 21'15 1,} ,.�•1(^!, �, '42' :.a .;t+" { {•'� 'dl,��'•�,tl !,4'1;y :d'Ya;l,:�f,.64, r�„•..1 'rS'KI �•r; ;.5;'.;.f, 11. ')•:, �, {'r � f. 'I '''1,0.a y �.e i ti• If�p t'lc�� ,9 .;+ A1}{"; 1 �,�.,I,I.Sr1M�.d.n ;�:,'�?. •� �{+ 'Wl1�%� C:'r.k+ n r�l .,rr:' ,yr.�.,r�yt�,r>,••�',; •i"{'i!'•t,.,�"�I,r.,~r, .��•y�C;,. 4•j�',ar,l'''};".. r }, .S,,y•1 rT, �(�' '?44• •.r^+4' L f, tr1 �' .y •q, t:..i'S1' f,;,' S`�f., '} i,�,;I i�.,. ai i!' '•, ;� r^.,•,� ..Ir, a}441 t .y •.�� i'kyy i�l'f•t1. r Nit ( tF• .rl� .,". w •�,4.;b"'t"�•, .f! 'l'. 2} a ^5'.°�' r1 `4'ci.l. yy;� 1 < yy 'ty . yr,, p l.,�r; i.:."9i I r►.yt• .}( 1..., 1•r:,�. 'l A'1.,,1+.:.1d';i ;%'� d .�tti t '� 'o�•i'� •+' '� rR. i' !�.1 {4':a l S'"`45 !� t• V• Yr,e'1•' '�9a i•b<{ i, } r .t.�.,l .f' ,}.y'11�'r y' tt'�'1.. iy t. 1 y •,.�rn± ( ,'a�' ;';/.• r r+ r,,y {r'•; S�(.' `� {1 •t i Y71+ ���(A�. !ti,' li. i:f: c�..•.�'i ' +i :�f;e�'` �. �."F^{:�•,1 �,,i?'�':yt%�ri•�,. ` �:� � 'S �y.. ,;t +� J.t�l;lrl' 5•liIt !'•.y}1,;�,�'�i,(yr� "' 1 .1•,� , Y i i f• 1�+1 v, S,1 (, tl•: t� 7 t„r le{ '1 5' r 11i.°' d/ 4, . �G' Xa' ,/♦ 4)}� yt �y , ''� i �'y/1'}a,a`,Y 15,f T �'�'4t•1• r1)t• Y I`�.`.!'?5'--Y a.+,t]::3r'��L:.s.�:,t,':•.t�iL:.�!i_....:-:1.'.�./3:SI.:1:rLr�''�J�.t�:+_'.,l:.lr..l.�.y::.I�.`i.a Yll�o'I II.J.. �.9C.7.1G.�c+SL.1�3t�1.•u�., {Y .:r.r a.".r.s:°,1...�1",_.L_.1..:.......�'.�:.`i::�;!"::..tlrC':.:._,:.c»a11.:=-i• - 1y�, C. Turning radius )f 27 teet for retail areas . d. Revised floor plans whirh reflect a total of 60 beds for the convalescent care facility. 2• A parking management plan shall be submitted and be subject to the review and approval of the Department of Development Services. It shall address: a. Signing b. Control of parking by use . C. van and limoi-aine service d. Parking by unit assignment 3. A copy of the guideline, fo. tenant occupancy shall be submitted to the Department of Development Service.: and , reviewed by tine City Attorney's office as to form aod content. it shall include provisions prohibiting persons from residing in the convalescent care facility without j first being a tenant of the apartment project for a minimum �I of six monLhs. 4 . Orange Avenue shall be constructed as a 100 foot primary arterial highway-with a 3.4 foot wide raised median and 8 foot wide sidewalks . 5 . Lake Street shall be 90 feet wide with 7 foot wide sidewalks � and a 14 foot wide raised median. ' 6 • pecan Avenue and Gross Avenue shall be vacated and City approveu. Cul-de-sacs ,hall be constructed at the end of each street . • i 7. Croso gutt:prG wil•1 not be permitted on Lake Street and 1 Orange/Atlanta Avenue. 8. Parking will be prohibited along Orange/Atlanta Avenue and Lake Stree►.. ' 9 • Patterned concrete within the street portion public right-of-way shall be limited to locations and design established in the Downtown Desiqn Manual . l0. All landscap.ng shall be installed behind the sidewalks and maintained by thefdeveloper . 1 .1 . Water plains shall' -be constructed in pecan Avenue, crake J Street and Orangt2/Atlanta Avenue to tie into existing systems. { 12. Storm drain facilities shall be constructed as required by Ithe Department of. Public Works. { '1A Staff Report - 6/18/85 -5- ( 2693d ) i I jig k, %P,,T X1. V 13. The primary driveway and acces.,3 widths shall be a minimum of 27 feet wide . The parking lot aisles shall be 27 feet widpl----., in the commercial area . 14 . issues needed to be resolved prior to appLova�; of the tract : a. All right-of-way necessary to accommodate the new alignments .of Lake Street and Orange/Atlanta Avenue shall be acquired. b. Lake Street from Pecan Avenue to Orange Avenue and Orange/Atldnta Avenue from Third Street to Alabama Street must be constrl.,cted to accommodate the new street* alignments. C. Traffic si nals at Lake/orange and Atlanta/Lake must be constructeg. d. utilities must be relocated to accommodate street and alley vacaEions and new street alignments. 15. An automatic file sprinkler system shall be installed throughout the complex to comply with Pamphlet 1.3, Standards of the National*' Fire Protection Association. 16. The, elevator cars shall be a minimum of 618" wide by 413 - deep to allow the 11se of an ambulance stretcher which. teas a fiiin.imum size 22" x 78- in its horizontal position. 17. Fire hydrants shall be approved and installed as per Fire Department specifications. 18. Any entry gate shall be approved a,id comp�.y with Fire Department Standards. 19. A wet standpipe 'system shall be installed in the stairway landings an packing garages as per Uniform Building Code Standards. 20. All access ways Must be a minimum of 24 feet. 21. A public address system and voice communications system ' shall be installed throughout health care and residential area. 22. An automatic fire alarm system approved by the Fire Department is to.'be installed throughout. 23. No parking area shall be designated. Fire lanes shall be posted per Fire Department Standard #415. Staff Report 6/18/85 -6- ( 2693d) R `T7 v '!f'}: ,+ tY' { T)ti Y"'i .y�' ,fa,,, 7 d "",i•'.,` ry H;� •s, ,T! r . „.� yj� 03, • Y1 •'�" !t'• AS�y,+{,{,�,,,'�'�1,:•y�'y 1,1i S;.a ..A,�: w p 9• �1fi`f ryyq� Sftt1 pp1,.} �. } L,r.s;t'�• +C !4 �,f ,. r ,.:X.•,1�.}. I, }C..+ / }R t{',{�,}!. a� 44,,1 1� �� ttl!yyrt� �ggii '1,"r'�.. ', it, �r f''' .t ,i 1 �' +, , '�'k"'� Jt•+�"ix; 11.. 't T St A Y�'{G7 °, •Y'M1 �T t' ''� y w 1 ..�, 1. . . �; , �',� •"a' f. � ��1�. 1;,ia` ,��, �'' .,�:. ' '. . I,a �,,•�,t, .:�" 3• 4:r ••'!:, .�' �C'• ,tip; vc1,,i�,' f, ,Y. d' , , n ,;./ t, .+•�� r J r:, y'•' , s .ht !•, 1.'. l,t,.. u� q'4,, •,y t,��, .u�F +{•: ,t,5 .�,5;; �,. f`'" f '; � }, w Y ;;t s• •k y �'• yy\ d.,. �y}� '� �S'; 1'!' •;t .�.. 1•e. f c.r P'!•%,G � ..� 11 y' t, t t ,�:'.�' 'i„';Mi. {';t;" ! ti:Y.', ,. 1 t .,,'it 1, � xr�'t - , ''r hjt• r,�i++,li,, �i�, +�,.;1 't r.." 4„p5''i: ,d Y' d ��+,.r:'•t! i ,,i,''.Y� °. f!}':'t;}^ '�+ (, �,+r ay,,�,�L}4Y ,. •"�.;;��y,f,,.�;� ����,'� :,1.a,va,,yyr"ti� .,v, ,f,'.�ti• t•'1•.'1•a.'•,; ,. !, ;�': v`` t � �,"�.:• ,f P' , .,�R�3�+ {,�p;l�''.',''�''�tY• ��:+• r �'�.��tf..Y� t( �1 �'SL.�l.Q4 ,il ti ' '... r^,.)' .y„r , �•'r l: '4n d. a S•S. F ii•.+;'. 'n•{�: !., C r<'j 7` , 'h� M,4' (i! �.ti'r'� �1�.[.+iwL+(. i t,� ..:,Sly.�'�. {V�.,;.t.s i s 4,,�u;•S r,:, 7 'ti!Y 4 �p �i',.!ram`ii• r I'�i.+,1. .1;`.' ',t t y t—.L. aYl."Lif..ri..s}y.r�:{,iJ l'rY..r�•'. 1,_J,�,' } ��. r '>�r,� 24 . in the draft development agreement which the applicant will submit, a provision for providing of low and moderate income housing units shall be made in order to comply with Mello Bill requirements. This agreement shall be reviewed by the City ifttorney's office as to form and content and apprcved by the Director of ,Development ServicaF. 25. Low volume heads shall be used in all showers. 26. All building spoils, such as unused lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable materials, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 27. Energy efficient lighting, such as high pressure sodium vapor lamps, shall be used in parking lot and recreation area. A lighting plan shall be submitted to. Development services which illustrates that spillage onFi adjacent properties will *not occur. 28. All structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall -be constructed in compliance with the state acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the CNSL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application fora building permit. 29. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject_ property. All structures within this development' shall be constructed in compliance with the g--factor as indicated by the geologist 's report . Calculations for' footings and str .,ctural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review -prior to issuance of building permits. 30. Natural gas and '220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the ' locations of the clothes dryers. This requirement may be waived provided 'that the applicant will install a more energy efficient alternative subject to the review and approval of the Department of Development Services. 31. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the location of cooking facilities, port-a-heaters, and central heating units. This requirement may be waived provided that the applicant will { provide a more -energy efficient alternative subject to .:he review and approval of the Department of Development Services. 40 V Staff Report - 6/18/85 -7- (2693d) 1 1 4 "L ai N, PiY r• a ! ,d } �:ti$ Sl' .."�.'+ Z�# �; ..; iF s nf,I �, ° p r. •Iy�.Y! , .',\t, �,J'Xt1 ° T. ,r.r '.9 .t,{. AI . c. y ,�.`,),r.'.:, �� ..1 ,. ,�:• '' t 1 q}, r y X: 1 t I ,y ! M AAA,Zti.'1.�fr.'�.ti' ,I dY,2..' +J".'4". p7�w.5? r, Ai .�r;•is +i ,,F�Ift�1 � ` 9; +I' 1 ,,:i"l ;r �Vy� •��� k� .,�� ..r$' 1'� nr• .,�y �I' E'rl.;' ., " r, '� ,�. "� ,1. ',�rIi f f J����� r��'� Se».,,! '' .�4'•i �' �r'J%11. !' `':t ` ' 1 4'�� � � �'. i �S "C• !,",� h. ,?,.(�t;�.1"iP; rl ,. �A a ,n }t �, ', " +r '!5';{.•,'e 714''<,,,rJ'X, •�5v'7::t i 'N 4.. ,n'�' Y.•.; s r, 4 7. �' '''' 1''.\\+`L �.: '11 .T.r i"`� +' �'�'�'y, +;f7s .Me, ,;: '� 1',C �"'r 1i.kX, �,•' 87+�;p iVl'' , �`y. ,� ,5' ,i: r 5'{ L i+y7a �'Y 31•, �. i;, 4,L "� r�,, �j ;r;+, Y r „� °!' ,t•� '�� t ' '4 ` �. `'i�•''�4,'•' f ,� tl.r `l i, � x�r, t' I i \ '�II�. r9`l,,,i•'.� s 1y r 1 „'S'�� +', v',.y�'� .t.�,i•.` n�'� a }r+ F+t .)t• 4 �'ht rS � ,, i+ S t. lY,.I�,ti, J•! �5•��,. y h'.I t a,K 5 •1. '7' f •Z:.l':Si V[ 'Y n._Ll...�...:1'.iiL. .: .... ' 1 } J is •11� I \F7,J J r": F4,". ,.�.,LrJ>,�l't +1e''` k.oJf1• 14 .la.: 'C"r� 'M4'r,'�1 ,l',}},,'!•� ..\ ��,�1 ill t�l�•�+�'' �' :au+.'k'�:�:A CONDITIONS OF A. 'OVAL, TENTATIVE TRACT 00. '-'qGG 1 . The Tentative Tract No. 12268 received and dated May'.124 , 1985, shall be the approved layout. 2. A cop}, of the recorded tract map shall be filed with the Department of Development Services prior to issuance of building permit's. 3. On-site water system shall be constructed and dedicated per Public Works requirements. I • 4 . On-site sewer system shall he private, but is subject to iIlPublic Works cequirements. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: As an alternative actio�j the Planning Commission may consider Idenying the subject applications based on the following findings. 1 T FINDINGS FOR DENIAL COtJllITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-24; 1 . There is limited on-site parking being proposed to support the 205-unit apartment project (51% density Cronus ) with an additional 60 convalescent care units. Because of this, surrounding properties will be adversely impacted by the mixed use development. 2. The location and site layout of the proposed use does not properly adapt the structure to streets, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. 3. The combination and relationship of one proposed use to another on the site' are not properly integrated (an excess of convalescent care beds to apartment units ) . 61 4 . The applicant has failed to provide all the information " requested by staff (parking management plan, tenant I occupancy guidelines, staffing profile, control of pedestrian access) in order for the Commission to Icomprethensively .analyze the proposed project. II FINDINGS FOR DENIAL CONriITIONAI, EXCEPTION NO. d5-27: 1 . Because of the 1'imited number of available parking spaces available to the mixed use project the granting of a Conditional Exception will be materially detrimental to the I� public health , safety, and welfare or injurious to the surrounding land,, property, and improvamento in the neighborhood of -the property. ; 2. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the land which prohibit this property from being developed in full compliance with all development standards of the. ordinance cc :le. eqN Staff Report - 6/18/85 -8- ( 2G93d I i n�. f � 'r �' '� .�� �'.'��'' �j1.;�;� ti . hk!•a��4 4.:"&'�ti;;P•'P +�)..�¢+•, ':l�ti �A•, 1�. 'del t'.nF i"�'�� ti�i ti',.�s�,�' ;}. ;� •' h����Is a '�� ���'S' � �•�' ,:5 sS i-Id �•1• i� S• <rr � i � :.t'�:� +' ,� '• v�a { �� �ai. 5���4, f!R e � 7 .1, i,��.Sf. ..!. .y�•�Y q � +i.ter, '+.. �,t ,l i.1!.1 Y,��Y�+;'it` ,,i�5 wt•�, '�.' r . � M �k• �44'�.n,'S+'l�:K�!F�3 i;�,ta�' �� � 5.,+,�4• I, �n'�'1.�;�3�4 � .r'��''�'J i.1�•}•.�� � e t!r�.�'�!t�a"t: �I�•`F'"a+.�. {�.�'•r'ti! �a. �A�� ';r.,•'i' S +.'. ,! ;1r•'r•{"� �!! / �•.A r. 'A• 7•i' !Y �'• r'•� q.i fat,, M�1�'1 t.+4�•?.,f�,1, �,, i �'•d,rt t�V� a .4' 1 � +!, �'1�'J',,�•�; � ,s;'��Q�', v ay •ga*,,. �, � `�. •� !., ..a 'c1f� �,• � .( ) � '�;'' �• n•.,,;�d5 4.4rr�k i, t I•,w� .'!`., ;+1el.a { ;:�1'hr». htV!",f;t, ��{ T.,�q, 't {����� ,t ��.jtJ �a�•h+�{_1� � L• 1•i � �1Y� r.�,�y+}"'�,. L' .�r:. u �5/ '�.*...�.".5:} r, 5r n,�l"''} ! +.!.• '� ,{' ?"� '4 1'F' C 't��.ff4"L6'Pu`a�•.:Y."}�i.+�:�1�1'a�i:2t5.' .:�.Y�n i Q, 'C+A'3�:.'u�i.i�'1�� n r !!• . �•f.•.a: ;�1... 155' (. I.`'♦Ar ti":'. l� s [{ I 1 1'r.. "� �:.+.�Jw W ,» 1r:Yl1J:•11+�YlLYr+ �L1.ut11.3..l.�C:L�u'�i t:.L-•••• •••Y.•ili )� i�. 3. The granting of Conditional Exception 'No. 85--27 is not �"�• necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of property rights. There are other site plan designs/concepts for the site which can be developed, i ATTACHMENT: ' 1 . Staff report dated June 4, 1985 with attar;iment 2. New statistical information provided by applicant 3. Economic data provided by applicant 4 . Parking Management Plan JW.P:H':kla . • 1 1 -Staff Report - 6/18/85 -9- (2693d) I T.W ,I y etK• � ,i t yY +r ,� i..�,r .� �• Y �'S'1. C + 1�',� ^,r�'�, �y- t, .,p r rv r {`�t ''; r,`- �•.�Y ,i1h ��.q+5� 5a((4 i 9 �j S t t 1+" r t.�[ � k j >, '4r1�` yt„ r•�/1 �; t `3 ti�:..r i•A �'?q1 'f,.ta r?I:�,ut +O.A+�' ' i�'. ,y�'f� n i t i. ,.1.• k rl�•tr,,i; rr,'41., :,S 'qd„ t ` "n. �' :';71Y,J*k4r. Y} A{ f k+S �1 ! 1 r J.,. {� .''V. I`�: ;^1° .R'. 4 '%�;. �-i S' r < e.:� : . ,4 r /.�tri ;�• .. r:'�.�d�. ,...� a• `')A A,.1If'Lt'fib}1i,.5 •S•, •� �.r ..� �. �Y•, r�'r !'}.,':t��'y ,r 'Y y A',•�. � •,ty,i t/ r,t '�' ,�.Y.� � N�Y6,� � N• i. ,1t t � L,y.11•R ! V 7 4 Fyn ' •� l^ >` ftY� +�i;�'�2.� , rr,��>IYt nl,tiro A •,}:td•vr �;'Y r +y�12. Y,Yr 11.''.5.• 'f. �r•'`w t `, :f'P- J Lisar i�� l rLii hLewr.:�sYwE �' i �y G1 :-.�1 r c,. �.. •,� v.�s �' `,A�.�.i"r�'rs �4`�s.1 rY.:u S� ail huntington beach devolepment sdrvices department TO: Planning commission FROM: Development Services DATE: June 4, 1985 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL 'USE PERMIT NO. 85-24, TENTATIVE TRACT No. 12268, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION No. 85--27, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT .PEhMIT NO. 85-7, NEGATIVE DECLARATION` NO. 84-34 APPLICANT: BWC/Vanderwood DATE ACCEPTED: 615 S. Flower May 30, 1985 Los Angeles, CA 90017 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: REQUEST: One lot subdivision for 60 days after application the purpose..of constructing acceptance mixed use project consist- ing of 205 senior apartment ZONE: Oldtown Specific {{ . units in conjunction with Pan II - Downtown Specifi 30 convalescent units and Plan "I .01 . 30 assisted care unit:s GENERAL PLAN: Medium/Low LUCASION: Property is located at Density Resdential the approved realignment EXISTING USE: Vacant/ of Take Street, Atlanta Residential Single Avenue, Orange Avenue Family Development ACREAGE: 6. 62 gross acres 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: ' Continue action on the request to the June 18, 1985 Planning Commission meeting at the -request of the applicant. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: I On October 4, 1984, the City Council adopted a Precise Plan of Street Alignment 84--2 establishing the street configuration of Atlanta/Lake/ Orange connection in response to the circulation section of the Downtown Specific plan, identifying this intersection as one needing further study. As aresult of the realignment the proposed project lies in the Oldtown Specific Plan District II (87% of the site) and 'bowntown Specific Plan District V1 (13% of the site) . District VT of the AMX A•FM•2JA e i� �a „INI' t ,, �,� , $ ,4.} q + /��+ � �Y.r ii �.{ ' il�' •' ' i r� ,. j !i rI � ' Y }•.« �•:ft .r'.3 il. 1N;.'U,.',I' Ile'tl:.y t}�.,11'�1•,� Y c �'�' rj+ �R!�' Y1�.°1i '�':'�'.1:` �r +{'�!,•'t n"11�' S. '•1°v, '�•i.5�4 ,�11�}.�,raG�(y� ,`'1 ,'���• �r,!`��y,',• t, ,5�,, .. ✓ ti�� '�' 1• r1 t�l 1i• .r h� 4G!;,s, :�' r'' +.'vn ,n �ati;,;�, ,1a �,.,w''�':'.'' t G'�,h"'' .5 .�; aS,1 •�'I,s f', ,5 •�� }7 'ilf ���i�bq k�: t.! J. 7•} [;3' •/� ei�iy ''�;t.; ,:P y. n, i:+� t•y i �•i '}•'`,i..`"y y{J}j; j�y4�6R41� N v1.S �y�', '�S}n�[Llr�4.y .. a••��., ��'•' 'e' +�r,�•p rlye�rM1�y�!��'i V,. .1'• ��•.� .:� T�f •� rv�•a �'�i��:.' .wh ;}� •4.f.',`•R.,.'s7{;.�a,�.,t1..� y,l:k 1.+��'n•FIYi..r� ..Ar'hVf�V ' �"'.;�, �1 C+ `� + f; P;iA1+r tip."'r' ,5� r+ ,ii hS,y ��)I k�kr}'l•�''.a !� � �, I .I sir 1'r 33� y ti ,r ���f;�, 1 � �'. 'tSyr l77 •7 l i�,\l'.SL.•1.•�L 14 +S: r ,` a !t r •'i� a 5 ''. 1 A. t 1 } ` rA 1! ll k S 55 'MYyypp••,, l' 1 i G 1 �i.�5�1�17.6:'.{]vlhtfr.c d.rt .+..r.'.:t:+i�li;11+L�1.:..aJJG-��..`: 'R f'•r4 Y 11 ! �,� 1'!1�1,L�M,}r r,� {7��. .I �,�A I � � 1 �l, Yu..J..•Uw`+L.1'M.r�l�a�}�>�'` � '� �Vl-'SKIS�..:1sY.l�•Y�.�•'�f1.J/YtI'i':III!`•l'GJ l�� �`N7:I.u i1 r/,.. Specific Plan is an area intended to be a neighborhood--oriented shopping and service area with public gathering spots . It is also intended to provide .+:or residential developments in conjunction wit,. commercial activities. ' The Oldtown . Specif•ic Plan is primarily a residential zone with low to medium density development. Since the project is divided into two zoning classifications the i staff analyzed the project using a formula arrived at by taking a proportional percentage -.of the site area in relationship to the zoning designation. Also provided is a brief analysis based on unit f count in the project. 3. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: r: On May 25, 1985, Draft Negative Declaration No. 84-34 was posted for a 10-day review period in a newspaper of general circulation, no comments either verbal car written were received, the staff is recommending approval of Negative Declaration No. 84-34 prior to any action on the ' request for entitlement. 4 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, 'ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Subject Property: , GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONING: Oldtown Specific Plan District II/ Downtown Specific Plan District VI LAND USE: Vacant/Single family units North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONING: Oldtown Specific Plan District II/ Downtown Specific Plar aistrict VI LAND USE: Single family residential/apartments West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium density residential ZONING: Downtown Specific Plan District VI LAND USE: Single family dwellings East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONING: Oldtown Specific Plan District II LAND USE: Apartments/single family residential 5. 0 COASTAL STATUS: The City of Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program has been certified by the City and California Coastal Commission. A Coastal Development y Permit (CDP) is required 'for any dev .-lopment within the coastal zon which is not exempt. �7"Staff Report -- 6/4/85 -2- ( 2579d) 1 i 0 I I i v •�" :�, pjt � A r 1 � � {YI y'•� y1A ! ��qv,r ��1V[�L�_ y�,�, i' },il�'��1'� 5 S �' S. } lY,fl' T r �+ Y {'T 'y 5. , '{ '�,• � �k'�i ' •'c I • p��,+M„1�,Y�;. l,. 9�i r�r1,t Tn°.,a�r ',�'i '1'.41',.,r" .,1 M�. 7„• ;p i,ti �t� t',[`, �'t�t' 'y,�S ,;5��; .;R r Y .�. ! '� ti 4�� I{',y'1 t.k..'�� ��4:�1' f q( � i r i,• (1, �'. 1nt,lt. R 1, s � �I 1�''� �$ i!!%� ?"� � ► M1 ✓ ..y"r�3�.� 5.9 fj ,f• •� �;�a�4�' 1,f fi z IYI� 1. �.•}'�[.�}. �,y�l�' I �. ,'. ,� rt t i rw ,',2 s't; � ri'•' ► •r„k a; T. �°'; ! i � #� �r,a• a',, �' .,.y�' ; i •rw° G;6+� � �. ��f.. .i a � '.: :+; vet � ta" '��.'� ie '• �,�.• �• � '•,.r...,. l! rs.',C'�4, ;�^�`,t.. } i.t; {), a gq,� 4Ny��, ,� 1"..� ?�tia�". !!� 4�ra1...r }}' d:nt{•ti' ,�'t,:6r,�'y e{•.`�,•i iy,V' !,,':�G��t4T �'! �t1.: in.��•i�;.Y�: }.�; , �� 5#{� 11.�:+�.a �i �.P•t'a. '4 Tb.4 .i• G��. r� �y � x'i�t i N.r '�t�'.ik'•�1�� 15 IY !,!r .,Tr' .�i � :xt y r i r'rr 7 YY' / � f�I t�l � I' .'i� �� ,1 Y t•,. u '1•' aa L S'yyyll,i, ,P.. I �i 1 1'{r`�, LJ 1�+ '�"^4I '►7 • Y ,'ja1rMr 1•,� 4 v pp1 ' '�<• V.'7 T Jr 1 R� V' I L1 ..l,t ''� T.7. t• `; 1, ! 't �t� :,���}?4{y/ r�Jtn`t��.}'a� 'f..a;�[FN i^"I•�P 1� Y ISL�'f; ! ,� :l The subject site is an area designated as "non appealable" which is all the area of the coastal zone, lying inland from the appeal jurisdiction. Projects located outside the a require coastal development a ppeal jurisdiction l from the City. These are not appealable to the Coastal commission. The Planning Commission may approve or conditionallya , Coastal Development Permit after making tile e following y i (a ) LUP. That: the development project proposed application conforms with the Plans, by the CDP pan standards of the C--LUp; s Policies, requirements and (b) zonin Regulations That the CDP application is consistent wlr tie specs lc •plan as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the Property; ' (c) Adequate Services, eve ate St can a That at the time of occupancy the proposed provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with C`LUP; (d) California Coastal Act. That the development conforms with the Pu L IC access and -public" recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act; I (e) Conditional Exce�tion A lications. In addition to the 11 find ngs required for a Con t o al Exception b CCommission, the following finding shall also be by made: "Approval"Approval of the Conditional exception will result in no modification to the requirements of the C-LUP. " 6. 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: On June 26, 1984, the City Council ap for issuance of tax exempt bonds for thevconstructioned an inmoftmulr°lutio� family, residential, units for the subject I►' the applicant has been negotiating with therredevel Subsequently, arrive at a development .e teems edevelopment staff to participation with respect to the costhofoQ£t..satress the city •s (utility relocations, street improvements ) . At this time,the negotiations has not been reached. closure on 7. 0 $UBnIVISION CODIDIITTE$• . On May 30, 1965 the Subdivision Committee met to review Tentative Tract No. 12268 in conjunction with Conditional use Conditional Exception No'; ive and Negative Exception Coastal Development PPermit NNo, 8855?�° were representatives of the Departmentl.-noftPubliccWork the meeting Commissioners Ro;eland£, riahanment of Development eSelr� Miryahangii•. Services , YYT D. b Staff Report - 6/9/85 ' ► (2579d ) L ' �. t'i, 1' , . '! n;�+' �6 � •,, 1 �mv� I ,� r1 i�w.}�j,j� 'it J s'44�,y;,��''�'•� `kl�,� 'f+"�L? y�y 'L�' �itf!' � �t f. . �� •.0 j '.'4','� ,, '�yy�; ,rY ;�1;4 y: 4' t 'p„5 + {l.r• k��''`' •.i(1 !tft/,�; yl,si r'�,t�y !v'.::���i1, ski,4+r 5 4,, }�;•• 4s1 � � ,t.'i.� e� .2�°Y j•11 a� '^'n;' V:{, • � .'G V 5 •af :1 ' 1 C't• .i: l yA.{� s ti 7 5 X"' �k,^1•�` y� :�`Asfi A. ..frr ' ,L ,;,' 4 ? .•{�', , it 1• •Nnl� t;r t `7••. i i. 3 ', '� Slt', , �'." .,. ,�. �^•.IL C �". '�ai.l � ,+. )4�'4 1�''..�� ,�•. •.., i:�.. ,L,I•. 1'�qt3 "k' ,0' l 3,� t J, {, �' S�4,'�4. 'it4�" �.,, V' '4.,e,' ",, � ,�,.: s' ,•. �Y,{. ti.• `i+ t1.1;1(, F".Y' ,�'� :C. Y�^I., 1 9.1 4" ' •� t i 4 �.d, � � , @ `5 ,lP�• � • s., I,!, '� der, < t i1w a yT . cti,. YJ}� �,!. L4 ,'�(�'y�2 •Y � A.• ,7` •,�, 3,e,5 , r`� �.•J by.t� {1', Y•4 s. t � J s j .�}.;r, i'i .� ••�''(!� � 'D'' �� +.{t+}'�,,;F�'11y, aiv�}y`r'.,} i�y5�1 T'yy, :i 1 ij,,'f,�j(' n.{v •j1':"s,� '� '��.1•��,;+i.y,:r„'.1} ''4.!yr 1 * f''`J'''SY, ,[•,s j17 '1 9 11.9�` t(i 7 '+i''�'K 1 2• '' ,� . � . k:+L:�LI."I{ ,:'"t' X�Ltl` r�.+►,uT .�'u5�S'.C+�S:X,"`!r l `� S , 5.1 tt.� ��k.•,}i'l+i'� ��' � 1 kti1 +R. "t'? 1 f5 lt'i Y } s! , , 54 iA� 7 oswwl�.y..sl• �411+++1-tr.+•w.4Y�1i;Y ws• 4 '+" .k .`1: I•�14,•��'tii.v;•l.!`,••:ti,y,J5,,,5•};,,'.{ �, +1� �;�1'1 4 ,�}. 7y! .�S�.i:.L"%..hi(�_ f 5 1 _.,' �t..L'...tiu'CA1.:,h.:i+�.:.:i.::�y .ik..Ti,.1Ly• ;;'4 >:�1` Major issues discussed at the meeting included the mechanics of operating a mixed use senior apartment project/convalescent. care facility and the overall impact on the downtown redevelopment efforts, !`ire Department. and Public Works issues, and a brief analysis of the plan check results. A copy of the minutes from the subdivision meeting are' attached for Planning Commis&`ion review. 8. 0 ANALYSIS: As previously indicated, the subject request is for a mixed use development consisting of 205 senior apartment units, 30 assisted care units, 30 convalescent care units, 14,500 square feet rttail commercial and 2,400 square feet office. Because the project is located in two distinct zoning districts , and is a mixed use%project , there are several ways .to analyze it for compliance with development standards. Staff used a formula arrived at by taking a proportional percentage of the site area in relationship to the zoning of either, O'_dtown Specific Plan District Il or Downtown Specific Plan VI Development standards charts appear on following pages. Also provided is an analysis* of the project based on various unit counts that can be achieved in the project . The calculations presented in these charts are based on plans submitted prior to the subdivision committee meeting. A sLimmary indicates that the applicant is requesting a 51% density bonus (assuming 136 units permitted ) ; relief from the parking standards of Article 979 (the applicant is requesting that the project be evaluated by senior residential standard parking standard of .6 spaces per unit ) ; deviation from tl^ 30 foot height limit, deviation from upper setback requirements, reduction in driveway width, reduction in common open Space, i deviation from maximum site coverage requirement. I Access into the project will be from two locations: nortu end of { Lake Street and the intersection of Atlanta and Orange Avenues. Lake Street is designed as a 'secondary arterial with a 90 foot right-of-way with a 7 foot sidewalk capable of accommodating 15,90n to 20,000 vehicle trips per. day. Atlanta Avenue will be a majr, arterial (100 foot right.-of-way) able to accommodate between 20,000-25,000 vehicle tCips per day. It is anticipated that summer beach-traffic will use Atlanta Avenue. i t Staff Report - 6/4/85 --4- ( 25796 ) I r, �+ i:. ";i } ,1 •.�. 1,•, +fS i i w ,5 r �,,Y�.:.�, i. �,i 'w'.k':d; ' ,' ,�I�+!r� �'f 1 �t,i :51 Yr �PiF +�,�'�,.•�F :11' 3'tirl ,�, ,s., 1iT �'� �! �,' {� ,���1$•[7,�",h' n�'i t'1r4.11 viY�Pt ,.� ,$', ,+'.�w/,;ir(�. t+ 'Sl• a•n �. +! :�,4 :e i• !e''i:r; �.fN n �a .1 l �,i; i i!, ,`,� r.. I+, r l•r�. i j' ,{, f,, •�,• .�. A. v1X ,.,;K �.+, 1 ,:r' 1 ,9:�:f ! tik„i,M'd.+,S. t' 7,a f 'k1tr• �g +N i►}.t:� "'ix N/', ,y,r,b "'t''i U� r ��{aY ��'S,i. ': ��• �,.��,�'.,��, ;�},`�`.���, p{ o+ +e.�� ��f.'�:�+ie 5,��{�.'S�+. �,�'a+�yrt'"yr�+ +r.,ir,"rR:♦�� 'n� ';'�'. 1�! r•p, 1 ,� �.k'�'+ ,q! s kV,.15,..�'c�'.r -'�;.,,.. ',� , �,,r � ,,. S 1 5 , r; +,x ��', q.:,•.�..��. .'�l�,4���. '.'1,ti + �4 "� !,, a.' + ':.� „�, /5'.4'-.a.+t+�li�:..° �t� '����� ��.L"r��T'.' VlC M;,�,�r�, � ,�'��: .,�i�r;t �N...,.,�.5,'•�,.}t•r• 14�(7f` e..Y� a' �(h'i' ;�'1'5��,'4'�',6'': � '�!',i ti.si7.is iii JP.i �.. � �'6'+ �F t •F 1•••.l y °111`FFF1.�•„# ! }) r, (S,yJ} + ♦'FL:.aa,au.6lu4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS r ISSUES OLDTOWN �pOWy�N PALM COURT SENIOR TOTAL PROPOSAL ------ STANDARD ' 3 of area 87% 138 1008 , ! Gross ac i es 5. 76 . 86 I 6.62 Net acres 4.28 . 64 4 .92 Miaimuir, !! Parcel Size i ; (sq. ft. ) 2,500 10,000 f; 10,000 Max Density 6. 62 acres 10, 000 . � (du 's) 115 21 136 205 base distric� with 51% density+bonus density w/1 ow • � Marc Intensity bonus inCome�� mc+d (F.A.R. ) (sq. ft. ) 279,654 72,135 351 , 789 213,855 None Max Auildi»g Height 30 ' 4 story 301 45-50 ' * base district fax Site Coverage 50% None 5 Q7,i157 57• et* base district , setbacks r3'• ft• + i0% 1 Front 15 , �' ' Side 1' 15 ' 15 'Rear 10 ' 31 base district �0 ' 40 ' Upper Story None 2- ' w/2nd 25+ * None y off net lot { Recreation 40� of Space 3,2i; net 77,829 574 60 - 1 bdrm. 120 - 2 bdrri. for rental project ' Indicates Conditional ExcePt"" is needed. i Staff Report - 6/4/85 -5 (2579d ) { 7 4 i I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (Continued) ,7 DENSITY - ASSUMING 136 UNITS PERMITTED = 23. 9 UNITS/ACRES (115 DU/OLDTOWN + 21 DU/DOWNTOWN) " 205 DU APT = 36 UNITE/ACRE 51% DENSITY BONUS 235 DU APT = 41 .3 UNITS/ACRE (includes 30 75% DENSITY BONUS convalescent care units) , 265 DU APT W 46. 5 UNITS/ACRE (includes 30 95 DENSITY BONUS convalescent carp un-its and 30 . assisted care units ) ' PALM COURT SENIOR PARKING OLDTOW14 DOWNTOWN TOTAL PROPOSAL• STANDARD Retail. -- � 14 , 500 sq. ft: . 73 73 None Office 2 , 400 sq. ft . 8 12 None Residential P7$ 13Z Studio (48 ) ( 40 ) 60 ( 8 ) 20 80 1 bd t127 ) (107 ) 161 •( 20 ) 50 211 2 bd ( 30 ) ( 26 ) 39 ( 4 ) 10 49 units units Employees (25 ) 25 250* 421 i + Indicates Cond4tional Exception is needed. Staff Report - 6/4/85 -6- (2575d ) f I i PARKING STANDARDS BY UNIT COUNT Standard Senicr (6 spaces_per un 205 DU APT 30 room Conv. (60 bd) 20 20 (2 space per 3 beds) 30 room Asst . (30 bd) 10 10 48 Studio 80 127 1-bd-m. 211 30 20bdrm `3'TZT.9 M 235 DU APT . 30 room Conv. (60 bd) 20 20 30 studio w/o kitchen 30 48 studio n0 127 1-bedrooms 211 30 2--bedrooms 49 141 IM 265 DU APT 30 studio w/o kitchens �. 2 bedrooms 30 30 studio w/o kitchens 30 48 studio 80 . I 127 1-bedroom 30 2-bedrooms 49 i 400 15u* TURNING RADIUS Standard Proposed Retail/Office 27 ' 251 * Percentage of compcct ca,:s allowed 20% of 43 spaces I quest parking *Indicates Conditional Exception is needed. Staff Report - 6/4/85 , -7- (2579d) a The plans received to date are not suf. i.cient enough for Staff to provide a recommendation to the Planning Commission. A number of revisions to the plan should be made, and it is necessary for the applicant to provide a more detailed explanation of several I . REVISIONS TO THE SITS PLAN: A) Close second entrance !Farling into th:, 2-bedroom units . B) Increase turning radius in commercial areas of the project from 25 feet to 27 feet. C) Redistribute compact parking spaces throughout the project. D) Reduce site coverage to 50% of the net site. E) Increase common open space to 40% of net site. F) Provide floor plans for convalescent units. G) Revise sectional plan indicating distances to property line and differences in grade with property to the east. H) ReOuce height by feet for the entire project I ) Provide locations for trash enclosures. J ) Modify balcony size on 1 bedroom units. �! II. ISSUES WHICH REQUIRE CLARIFICATION A) Provide a Parking Management Plan which addresses: 1) Signing 2 ) 'Security of residential units 3 ) Control of parking by type of use 4 ) Van and limo service H) Guidelines for tenant occupancy: i.e. , flow. long must a t:er.znt live at Pala Court before using the assisted care facility? How is the program for occupancy d^signed? N Number of beds in convalescent rooms? 0) Staffing profile E) Control of pedestrian access throughout the residential portion of the project. • Staff Report - 6j4/85 -8-- ( 2579d) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the subject request until the June 18 meeting in order to allow the applicant time to ma'.e the appropriaLi revisions. , ATTACHMENTS; • 1. Area map 2. Site plan, floor plan, elevations 3. Statistical information provided by applicant 4. Subdivision minutes 5. Tentative map 12268 5. Negative Declaration 84-34 Jt•�P: Z; 1a , 43 . i 1 1 1 I • , I 1 . Staff Report 6./4/85 ► --9- (2579d ) PALM COURT PALM COURT PLAZA HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA A"BWC/VANDERWOOD MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS 205 Units Gross Acreage: 6.62 acres Net Acreage: 4. 92 acres ' Adjusted Gross Acreage: 5.69 acres District Classification', Maximum Permitted Building Height: 4 stories Maximum Permitted Site ;overage: .123, 928 sq. ft Actual Site Coverage: 84, 055 sq. ft. Building Program: Retail Bank/Retail 14, 500 sq. ft. Retirement Facility Administration 1, 500 sq. ft . K: *Chen 3, 125 sq. ft. f� Dining 3, 62t*i sq. ft. Multi.-;Purpose 4,320 sq. ft. } Sub-Total 12, 510 sq. ft. Health Care Facility (30 Nursing Care: & 28, 500 sq. ft. 30' Assisted Living Units ) 3-Storey Residential (205 Units) 155, 935 sq. ft. Retirement Facility Total 196, 955 sq. ft. Open -pace m Comon 58, 555 sq. ft. Private Balconies. 24, 760 sq. ft. Total Open Space 63, 323 sq. ft. Units : Studio (23 .501) 48 units One Bedroom (61 .9%) 127 units Two Bedroom (1•i. 5%) 30 unity total 2755 units ti 5owa2eea52985 • r . 7 Parking Required: 14, 500 :q. ft. Retail (200 sq. ft. per car)sq. ft. 72. 5 spaces 205 senior• Citizen Units (205) 123 . 0 spaces at- .6/unit (per Code) I. 12, 500 sq. ft. Admiliistration/14ulti-Purpose Assume 25 Employees 15.0 spaces Health Care Center: 30' Nursing Rooms & 27.0 spaces •30 Assisted Living) at .3/Bed Total Required 247.5 spaces Parking Provided: Two-Lavel Parking structure (adjacent to retail ) 106 'spaces 66, 700 sq. ft. subterranean Parking structure (below health care/administration) 70 spacer 32,400 sq. ft. Surface Parking 73 spaces Total spaces 25T spaces PROJECT TOTALS: Retail 14, 500 sq. ft. Retirement Facility 196, 955 sq. ft. Garage Structures 64,000 sq. ft. GRAND TOTAL 275,455 Sli: ft �I . i i • I I 50wO2eeO52585 -2- V MINUTES SUBDIVISIO14 COMMITTEE Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Mal i-Street Huntington Beach, CA THURSDAY, MAY 30. 1985 - 8: 30 1M 'CCMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Miriahangir , Porter, Rowe STAFF PRESENT: Adams, Godfrey, Zelefsky, Poe, Patapoff, Spencer , �@�e :� i IS TENT/TIVE TRACT NO. 12268 1 Ap 1cant! 9WC Vann erwood A request for a one iot �zubdivision for the purpose of constructing a j mixed use 205 senior apartment units in conjunction with 30 convalescent units and 30 assisted care units on a 6. 62 gross acre site. Tony Canzoneri , the app: ic:ant , introduced the project . He stated tha the project meets the needs for the parcel and for the community. V, pt;cject is dcsigned for the affluent senior citizen as this• age grour. is increasing throughout ti,e country. Ile stated that the features have been carefully designed to address ?ndependn-nce and the needs of the senior citizen. There are three levels of care which include j independent living, assisted living units and nursing health care. Terry Tornek, the project manager , presented an updated summary of statistics of the project . lie stated that the concept of the project is to ptovide a variety of levels of care for the senior citizen. Th, architectural treatment has a mediterranean appearance in relationshil to the Downtown Specific Plan Guidelines. Commissioner Porter stated that he felt that: the health care units should have a separate entry. Mr . Tornek Cesponded that was the idea behind the plan. Commissioner Rowe questioned what type of staff would be employed in the health care facility. Mr . Canzoneri responded that the management cc,,nnany that has been selected is working on a staffing profile. +� There will. not be a physician on duty, however there would be a nurse on duty at all times. ' 1 Commissioner Rowe asked whet would happen to a tenant 's residence upor entering into the health care unit . Mr . Tornek responded that it would depend on the circumstance. It could be possible For an individual to be paying rant in two places if it is d-termined that f the individual, needs only temporary care. rf it is determined that ar individual needs permanent care, they could be required to relinquish their independent rental unit . w 1 O commissioner Rowe asked the applicant what they expect the rent �. structure to be on a monthly basis. "It . Tornek responded that it wild, be about $1, 500 per month on a average which includes two meals a day. He went on to say that a lot of work has to be completed on the. pricing. Commissioner Rowe questioned what would they do with ari' individual who becomes senile and unable• to care for themself however refuses to move into a health care unit . Mr . Vanoerhyden of BVIC stated that the 'rental contract is on a month to month basis arid, in-*,a case like this, an individual could be given a 30 day notice. Commissioner Rowe asked if staff foresees a traffic problem on ' Lake Street during the summer months. Mire Adams of staff responded that the beach traffic will take advantage of Atlanta Avenue. Tom Poe, Deputy Fire Marshall discussed the following. conditions: • i 1. An automatic fire sprinkler system .shall be installed throughout the complex to comply with Pamphlet 13, Standards of the National Fire Protection Association. i 2. The elevator cars shall be a minimum of 618" wide by 413 " peep to allow the use of . an ambulance stretcher which has a minimum size 22" by 78" in .its horizontal position , j t 3. Fire hydrants shall be approved and installed as per fire department specifications. 4 . Any entry gate shall be approved and comply with Fire Departrien._ standards. . i 5. A wet standpipe system shall be installed in the stairway landings and parking garages as per Uniform building Code Standards.. i 6. All access ways must be a minimum of 24 feet . 7. A public address system and voice communications system shall be installed throughout health care and: residential area . Q. An automatic fire alarm system approved by the Fire Department is to be installed throughout. 9. 110 parking area shall be designated. Fire: lanes shall be posted per Aire Department Standard No. 415. Mr. . Poe asked the applicant if they would be providing emerge icy care. Mr . Tornek respcnded that there would not be a doctor but would have a director of nursing who will be a licensed convalescent care dire: tor and a number of registered nurses. Mr . Poe asked the applicant if there would be entry gates,. The applicant responded that entry gates were not in the plan.. (2573d ) -2- Subdivision Minutes 5-30-85 9,b } Mr . Poe indicated that one of the stairways stopped at the third floor 'and stated that it would be required to include the fourt`) floor . Mr. i)oe asked the applicant if they plan to have trash ghutes. Mr . Canzoneri responded that -the plan has maid service ind-it has not been determined if trash chutes would be used . fir . Poe indicated that if trash chutes are incorporated into the plan , special requirements would have to be met . • Bill Patapoff of the Public works Department discussed the follow�.ng . ^onditions: 1 . orange l:venue shall be constructed as a 100 ' Primary Arterial Highway with a 14 ' ;wide raised median and 8 ' wide sidewalks . 2. Lake Street shall be 9V wide with 7 ' sidewalks and a 14 ' wift ' raised median. j i 3 . Pecan Avenue and Gros:, Avenue shall be vacated and City + approved. Cul-de-sacs shall be constructed at the end of each street. 4 . Cross gutters will not: be permitted on Lake Street and Orange/Atlanta Avenue. 5 . Parking will he prohibited along orange/Atlanta Avenue and bake Street . . G . Patterned concrete within the public right-of-way shall bc, limited to locations and design established in the vowntown Design Manual . 7. All landscaping shall be installed behind the sidewalks and maintained by the developer . g. Water maids small be constructed in Pecan Avenue, Lake Street and Orange/Atlanta A.,venue to tie into existing syst,2ms . 9. Story drain facilities shall be constructed as required by the } Department of Public Works. 10. The primary driveway and access widths shall be a minimum of 270 wide. The parking lot aisles shall be 271 side in the commercial .-3rea. 11 . Compact parking shall not be permitted along the primary access j drive. 12. Where will trash pins be located? f 13 . Issues needed to be •resolved prior to approval of the tract : a . All right-of-way necessary to accommodate the- new alignme- ts of Lake Street and Orange/Atlanta Avenue shall be acquired. ( 2573d ) -3- Subdivision Minutes 5-30-85 i b. Lake Street From Pecan Avenue to Orange Avenue and Orange/Atlanta Avenue from Third Street to Alabama Street nust be constructed to accommodate the new street alignments. C. Traffic signals at Lake/Orange and Atlanta/Lake must be constructed. d. . -Utilities must -be relocated to accommodate street and allay vacations and new street alignments. Commissioner Porter suggested that Condition No. 6 be modified as follows: Patterned concrete within the public street sectioW' shall be limited to locations and design established in the Downtown Design Manual . , Commissioner Porter stated that he has a problem with 7 or 8 foot sidewalks•atthe curb in relationship to the street appearance. . Mr . Patapoff responded that this amount is needed for wheel chairs ; however it could be changed to the minimum of 6 feet. - Hr. t'anzoneri indicated they would work .with the Commission to make the sidewalk functional and address their concerns . Commissioner Mirjahangir asked where the lights would be, Mr . Patapoff etated that has not been established at this time. Mr. Patapoff indicated that Public Works was concerned about tN*e compact parking stalls and suggested that this be redistributerd throughout the site. I Commissioner Mirjahangir asked the applicant if the parking for the retail is ,separate from the resz.dential parking. Mr . Canzoneri stated ! that the retai.' stalls would be assigned for retail only and indicated that the parking is in compliance with the code. Commissioner Porter stated, th;ryt the Orange County mrarFi.t might possibly hake some adjustrriOnts to their routes . He sujgested that ar, area should be pocketed for a bus stop. Mr . Patapoff asked the applicant when the issues listed in condition 13 would be.resolved. Mr . 'Tornek stated they were meeting in the • !j afternoon and hoped to resolve the issues at that time. He said that the real estate acquisition is in the process. it Howard Zelefsky of the planning staff discussed Development Services 1 coneernr. ,He stated that the project is located in two zoning districts. 07% of the project is in the Oldtown District and 13% is in the Downtown District. Commissioner Porter recommended that the Specific Plan be altered because the project is one continues project in two different. districts and the senior suffix standard. Mike Adams ` of planningst.aff stated that altering the Specific Plan would require amending the Coastal document and that would be an extremely lengthy process. ;L (2573d) -4- Subdivision Minutes 5-30-85 Mr . Zelefsky indicated that Development Services agrees with •Public Yorks that the compact parking stalls should be more evenly -distributed, He went on to request that the applicant provide a colored plan on the site coverage and open space. Mr . Adams of staff recommended that the project be 14wered to 30 feet from the proposed 33 feet on the east siap and to 45 feet on Lake i Street. Mr. Zelefsky informed the applicant that prior to submittal. to the i 'Planning Commission they would be required to provide guide lines for i the occupancy, parking management ,plan, site plan For the surrounding land uses, and floor plans foi the convalescent care 'unit. He went on to say that staff was concerned with the second entrance to the two bedroom unit off the hallway. Mr. ' Vanderhyden stated the plan was designed that way because two unrelated individuals might elect to live together . Commissioner Porter ailreed that the .,extra door should. j be eliminated. j Mr. Zelefsky advised the applicant that the residential parking must be secured.. He informed the applicant that a fully dimensioned grade l! specification would be required. He also indicated that one of the balconies does not meek the. required 60 square feet and would have to be modified. Commissioner Porter advised the applicant to be prepared to discuss with the Commission the studio unit in relation to the size of the unit. fie went on to ask how many conditional exceptions were tieing requested. , Mr Zelefsky responded that there were 7 which are; , open space, parking, turning radius, site coverage , maximum height, upper story setback and percentage of parking. I jr ` I II } I - ( 2573d) -5- subdivision Minutes 5-30-•85• - 4 i I _. =--,.�. __ ___... •ter TEMTAT I V .� TKAC7 WO. 12Z(ob --. IN ivo ary or 11uwnmr.Tm4 ceua, 5fAM Of CAl.IrOK141A •• -•- tTtlflttT t;TlOrf,6.1*4c VA c"A► W W.09=VD 19 0*9M. , tAiLtl.{ti Of MI4CIf1l.I W Wi KAM IN TM avwv GI/nm MA y 1[aC[IRDrR•t.�uNTY Ct ORJr ", b'TATS OF CALIM'OiG". I '� QW.G./ VAl1D�RWCICC>• ILa! •.rts�n frt snrsdn mx7tr tzol � ,.,,, t.a►�u+ai►ttx;,u.,�och1 Aj EFJGt�EEtG ru.t.paW b A4SyGCl�b'b iuG. tt/0C r aT&QmpcyMr1�'tJ�s1S t N ; • 6A►tTA A2iA U�t immitA, t27*+ + r+,} G.ViP t.1W1Oo1N- ><CD M�1vi • • Of ilpi w►�ar/ op -LOT I -All MAQ • , t y \. Ilk III • �� •• f' r. /'� t�' ;�' • a �1.IN1 K---• t►t�1i9{1i��R'yl'riCl'i W tt47 tt1! \,����•' , *••_�• —. Jam •--r_ ,1�j� •". • G(Ld1.U'.�7'ICt/17WC�1T1A7. , •� � � •..• ••» _.. <itikbLlC 1Q'.hCCf:CtT•S ti'1ufhX."'n.l itiJtd III TOTAL Wok Ct• Lbft r 1 WT A f.PPZ Ut6T 6f0W Af•tA• 7• AGµ ` • 7 ff+7,70c;NAr.�I MU1 LOOWP4"IA e•ce 4R'1j,. [D AtCtlf4•V cec•Ko.l �ir.ttAw,tog'"/tk"Wf. f N• �_ . tom~ ) _....T.•._ I �� 1 1 TYPICAL SEGTIatl•oKAWC.E aveNUE �„U,I.�cT�c�l•L� I J r�r_%-1', Lt1VIR7t:1�ENTAL INFORMATION' FOPV Fee ' FOR ;e ITY O(1,51: ONLY 1. Da to• Ilwe;/Vil lid erwuod C011111any/Wa1dVil to Aystlrirlte-e;, tnc. ' r '• .' Received: �t~!u11S njijifi.cant: Aut I tnrized Agent ' Project Number: 0A3�. 1,002 14. Carry Ave. , Suite 1i Si►nra Ana, CA. 9Z704 Department (if Origi i, tlalling Address (714).. 549-8649 f ; ► . r1 . 1 r . ' ft, 1 ! t c' Other Al cat:r p i :tc.:n I or Permit Nun�l)ers 1 . 7116 IMC/Vanderwoud Company Prol,arLy Owner iI nl11 S. flower St. , Suite 1201 hi.,, Anijelvs, CA. 9oO17 (217)624-1001 ttai'Tinc Address Telephone '•_ • ' i 'r! 'I• NOTE: To assist the: Department of Planning, and Environmental' Resauzc:e:A i in inakin(l a determination as to , whether a significant .envir.arl- mental effect may result from. thel proposed project,-the follawi ni.., information must he t;upplie:ct. Maps 'referred to below may be viewed at the City of Huritingt:on 'Deach Department of Planningj and Environmental Re:sourcea. , 1 . 0 Project Information .(Pleano attach Plot Plan and submit. photo-- grap try of subject: property) , 1 . 1 Nature: Of Proj(:ct : Give MilliPle3te3 description of the propo.r;ed � � pro ect;. •le�. .•,t . , The project consists of a mixed 'use, developluent consistin); of4-story I residential for retired persons alon(; .wltlj'.retail :stores and sllops. (For conduminium purposes.) a . If, the project: i:; comrr;f:rcial or:,industrial give: a corr.pl a l:e desui-.l.l)tion of activ.i_tie;s and other pertinent: information I including but: not: limil.t_,a to whetter it is neighborhood, I city or reUionally on unted,,l•square footage of sale'�s �1re.a�; I E`er. (if any) , estimated e111111ayment per. shift:, any potentially { ,Y hazardous wateriala which may he used, etc. Retail shop,; ar.d bank, neil;hhorhucsd orlentated. r b . If the project is residential,..•.indicate number, types and size of units and ,associated facilities . 279 living units, ranking in size •from 420 S.F. to 840 S.V. with itSHOr Fated rt-creat Iona l d i it ini;, mull i pit rpos-o, and Iwo It It C.Irk! rnt-ilIt:fvs. C. If the project Is ilisti t:utional, indicate the major function, estimated et playment per shif'_ and community benefits to be -derived from the' �Ioject.; NIA I d. List all types of building materials to be used for a1.1 structures in the project. (Submit detailed elevations if available) , Wood, :stucco and home brick of stone. r 1 . Z Location of project-. (Addre:;s,; nearest street int:ersections) BeLwcen Atlanta & PecanF Ea t of.!�41kq ' Crh�t. 1 . 3 I ,, Legal Description (Lot, Dl.ock,' Tract) I1Being a subdivision of a portion of the map of Huntington $ggc1l,.J141n Street'Secti.on 'aa sbuwn on a map recorded iii Book 3, F'aa� ;�;S.aE.�?tiscrlizneous;TFr:ps in 'the office cf' the, County Recorder, Cg4gi ,pf;prapF;e, SCat� •S+f..C:F�ifnt nia. 1 . 4 Project land arra (acrr:s) 6 1 -tNumber of parking :jpaces 316 _ r,. ail '.•� '� � . . , - 1. :; Square feet of building area 101,060 Number of floors 4 t%: What i:j the pLr.cent a•nd coverage proposed by the project for. ; a. Building ^_41 1.) . Pavifig 34 c. F:x.ist:i.nq landacalAng --0- ' d. New lanciucapinry 25 -:2- • G.:nura1 re.1 .ips ;vE t11 1►►*oject to uP;.� •)-Jndi11y h rot)Cr1.1 i ( Information a%,-.lable in Planning l7cpart. it on District 1•ta1►:0 r^ LAMD USE, ELb.PIENT USE 7,OWING G£NEPJ..L PLIst•1 'rosen t: VACANT DIST. 2 Proposed MIXED 115E 0111) TOWN NIXED US:: .., •• . SlIrGI1'IC PIAN surrounding DIST. '-2 north MIXED USE ,OLD TOWN MIXED USE S1 1 cIPIC' PLAN , y� nlsT. S n . Surrounding MIXED USE 1;(WN TOWN South SI'I:CIFIC.P4%N, MIXED USE DIST. 1 & 2 surrounding t OI.D•TOWN PIED. DENS. RES. . east I; SIDENTIAL SPECI;IiJ� I. 111 k ,r DIS'r: 4A,5n,b j :urrounding DOWN:+TOWN ? HLXED USG 3 MIXED USE FI4,PLIV' 4, 1. 11 What: will be the maximimn occupancy . ;all .,structures. proposed within the project? 500 t t 1 . 9 j List other public agc;hCies having .-jurisdiction- by law in *approval. , aut:horizatior. , certificaL•ion or issuance of a permit for this project: Q O.C. Flood Control District State . Division of Highways � 0 O.C. Sc1111 1'a l. )(n) l)i s t:ri►.L ❑ Corms of Engineers t--J O.C. Air Pollution Control Q City' Council District Planning Commission Calitornia Coastal 'hone ��--11. ' Conservation Commission ' 1._1 Board of lonincl ,Adjustment:; 1 EJ Califur►►ia Regional Plater LI Design Review Board Quality Cencrol Board `d� n ❑ Other; L.1 Local A(lr:ti,:y Ponnatiun Commission , c � I A15'• (h y 1 , 10 If the project is conum!rc1 .11 , Industrial, or residential what is the roadway distance in miles from the project to the nearest: 1 a. Shopping Center 2 1 /2 mi. ,1 )), Freeway exit 5 ' c, RIAmentary School (refere to •Recreation hreas Hap) 1 I/_' int . i d. Public park (refer to Recreation' Arana Map) I/2 ifl .— �. :scenic llighw.�y (reset tcm Recreation Paths, Cr�rridary , Araas Map) 4 0 Bxist•in2 Environmental Sett:i.n2 of Pro used Project: 2. 1 Soiamic: , � ._--.....---.ram.. a. What la the dis-tanca f.ro� the project to tha nearest teult. line (refer to Fault Map).? Unknown R 1 b. Is the project -rite within' a deoignated earthquake' hazar,l area (refer to-Earthquake Hazard Special study Z6ile Map) ? Unknown 2. 1 Drainage and Flood Control: a. PLease 'describe specifically'.'. the volume of drainage and how it will be accommnadatud: The onElte pad drainage will sheet flo41 4oward the acreets which will carry it, into an existing •atgrt4fdlir)►��; b. Is the project within d flood hazard area. NO or natural flood plain? No .' (refer to Flood Plains a- nd rlood Hazard Area Maps) c. What is the distance from the project to the nearest flood 1 channel? (refer to rlood Control Channels Map) ant . d. What is the distance frorn the project to the nearest shorel ine? 2 . 1 To ngra phy } a. !•rods l:he projr.ct .:rite r:xhibit excessive slope? (refer to I Topography:Slope Map) I b. What is the distance tr.•om the project: to the sparest bluL'i •� (refer to Principal J Vi:mtas and Features Map) i c. Whit :;.s the ranye. and slope of 'the property as it now Very flat. 0 i t Land farm: a. Is the property pre r-ently graded?, t�O 1). Indicate the 'gross cubic yards of gilding`proposed 13000 C."'._ � the acres of .land to be graded 5.9 , the amount: at'• • I earth to be tranaport:ed on the—s—Ft"e -5- , and the � amount of earth to be transported o e e --n- ce What will be the mastimum height and grade of cut: or fill after grading' is compl.et:ed7' 'Uni nmrg r: d. is the surrounding area graded? Yes If so, haw W.11 i . affect subject property? Will have no affect on Suldert prrjwt tv.• 2 . 5 Soils: d. Type of soil on the projegt,'site?,.. Hydrologic soil Type D t00% b. A're there any Peaty and/or Organic Soils on the site? (refer to Peat and Organic Soils map) c. Does the site exhibit: moderate to high expansive soils? N... o (refer to Cxvans. ve- Sail• Distrribut:icn Map) GeoloeZir ~ ;. a. Is the site within a High risk geologic problem area? 12o (refer to Ceo�echnical Land Use Capability Map) . b. Is the site within an area which has experienced a variahlu and complex hatLurn of land subsidence? No (refer to Land Subaidence Map) Hin torir./Archaaolo2j.ual. a. Could there pcisu.ibly hu any, objeets of historic, aest:hur-i.r. ur drehaeo.leyit✓al aiy,;ificance on the site?, If ao, jjl.uct:jrr duracrihe. (rerft,r to Archaeological Sites, Historic Lar►etmitr), i cea and Principal VTFM—and Features h1apB) NO .,Alp a • I • I i i f Wi.ldli'fe/Ve etation: a. toes .any wildlife u:-.e the site Tor a place to feed, ni-!.,-. i or rest? If. so, p.h:age list: , i }s. Will any of. Lhis wildlife be displaced by the propor ;ad 'project? No If so, how? ! i t , I c. Indicate the extent:, Pi2e and species of plant life: por-- I sently exishiny on the site. No .pl-ints on site. t � j •d. Indicate thet location 'and'"area '(� n acres or square feet.) and type of 'plant life to. be, removed as a, result • of the I { project. Include tnuinbe-r,•type and size of .trees to be re- moved, ' Clone 2. 9 water Quality. a. Does any portion of thc'project, abut or encroach on beacl,t. estuaries , bays, tidalandel -or inland water areas? }( do ;•'• �' b. Desrribn how the prrjact•will'' effect any body •of 'water. , { I41A ' 1• •.. ' •• , I r 2. 10 A 1.r Ilia I i tX r '• ' ' t�''•' a. If the project: is izjdust rial, describe and list air pot- ? ltIC-10n suuO.�es and quantity and types of pollutants unlit:ted at, .a rt%Su] L• of the project. i N/A b. List any Air Pollution Control District equi.pmen" re( i N/A 7 I{ I • If ,4 1 •,i r • i i �-•. l NoiFje A . Describe any adjacent: off-site noise sources (i .e. , ai.rport :, . industry, fregways) . . NntIC b. What noise will be produced byy the Project:? If availaulL2 , please dive noise levals in decibel measurement and typ.ic.il time diutributian when noise will, he produced. f ' There will he some noise during"dAlstruc'ion. t' i 4� c. Itow will noise producediby,tphe,,,prgject. compare with existi;:-., . noise levels? Nominal Increase during construction and during normal working hours. '!'raCCir.: ...�....r,..,... �•.it ►{•• I', � 'a • , 11 a. Indicate the present traffic volume on arterials and tadclUd t:ripn per day from thu project. Atlanta 6500 TI:/DAY • 6.5 TC/DAY X 279 = 181.3 � t Lake 7100 T1:/DAY 6.5 Tfi/DAY X 279 = 1813 1). What is the existing apeed "limit at the project location? • I 35 1IP11 f c. Indicate Points of egress and ingress to the Project . Primary access cif f of Orange—Atlanta Ave. ontt'ance, secondary ' access off of Lake Street: Other point; of access is eff—of Pecan Ave. a lI i. U Publ is starvir.es anal -Pacil.i.t.ies : ' Wal.a:r: Wi.11 the I)170ject: cecltlira installation or replacement: of new water mcli ns? No t�. At:Lar_h Ea ln.7p Uttowintj Ole wsez'vice area, size and lo- /� c;at_ion of new lines . et;L iwtat o chc ;I,a i ly volu;sle in clirallono rerluired ro :�ur•Vy thli -It :r-dut`I• :171) 96,22 pul . i 1, i 1 1 ,y, • i•, t i y �' j. i4N 4 1 1 A"'f r` A `, {'1 1t 1 •t t •Iw`.n 1 ' 1 4 {v 7A 6a 'f l: '✓,i ,'':i•. .a. lNJ. M ,�. .. :f .t ..E. rl S,'. I,. c4.,i �•• - -- m,.a.�r�., , �k-' ei „c i, •J So.we.r: / _ �w Will the project re quize installation or replacement ol` I new St,,wer mains; No W111 regitlry rvloY•eitt6tt Yt :t rutrtInn of the oxIsCilig : Vwer In i.ni(L• Street and Atlautit.a. b. Attach a map showing the: service area, size and location o new lines. NfJA Y , r" -Discuss the capacity required for' the project and hear this ' relates to existing eftluent volumas within the system. Lut 1 -• 130 gpd/DV X 30t DU-3900 gpd. • ) This volume will have very=litLle effY,,'t LnL 2 - 1300 gal. /AC X 2.OAC =3000 gpd. ) 11,650 gpd. on system. O.C.S.D. 72 sewer main LuL 3 - 2500 gpd/AC X 1.9 AC*=14750 gpcl. ) (Reach 3) is within 400 of pro.lvct A110 has more than adequate capaCity. 3. 3 Utility Lines: t ' a. Indicate lengtlr and type` of-triew'•offsite transmission and distribution facilities required to serve project. t No new tacil'ities, relocatioti of a portion of existing facilities. 1 f b. Do ,any overhead electrical facilities require relocatinn?e"'N- Yes 7i so, pl©aue describe facilities. IxIst. uverhend facilities pnralleling,Lake (F/8) will possibly Lo be relocaLed paralleling new niigttment of ia�e SL. 6 Atlanta Avv. f 1 c. Do a2:isting lines have to be increased in number or sirs: r for projectle No If soy please describe how. J. Q Solid waste: a. Describe Lhe type and amount (pounds/day) of solid waste cioncrated by the project. Type: Unknown --Pounds/Da y 5000i' 'J. 5 EducaL•i.on: ; a. For re-sWe:ntial Projects , note primary and secondary school districts: +.Y 11rintary: itutnti%igL(ni Beach Elementary , Seunndary: Iluntin-,ton llfi wh Unified School I)lstrict . I e J i I 1 r I Y t 1 7 �i y.• tl I 1 �'1•Wl�• .•7-'►\�''•»'71�LA 1' �� .Y. t ..1. ..h..�.t _�1 t•'t � _ ,t.. !e .1 t. t ti / /�yn..e d '.. •�'P'Pw .t 1' ,'; .r,'t. t' a �, It pF+Y,�,'•+ , 41 S .•� t1 'i e i. ,. - �t.l �+. .t..�':', .t .i±'i�{!'`db'SAM1,.I'�'.�x'.!� ' 1 ..'A`, v rf7 aY,Q' .t:116.�:.G!' .. .1 h•«..t .� .'.' 1'c�nul ttl:.i on D•t:;�c�munl:: S, will any residential occupant: be displaced by tile pro_je.:L activities? No 'fl not, Rio not answer question M . b. what: is the total nuttibear of residents to lie displacuct: Demo],it ton: Will any improvements be demolished or removed by the pr•ajewl No , if so, answer questiont; b through d. b. Imucrihe briefly the type: of buildings or improvemunt u to li•.: dumolished by thu pro ji:ut:. . N/n c. List: approximate volume of exported material. None i zndicatc thu location and the distance to the sits. where exported mectarial will bo dumped. N/A i 4 . 0 Mitigat'in2 Reasures•: •1 . 1 Are them:: measures Included In the project which may conserve: resource n (elec:t:ricity , gas , water or wildlife) ? Please describe. All bulldtiigs will utLLize the• InteSt plumbing, he•nting .tnd insulation developments avnil.aMe. •1 . ? Are there measurer proposed til the design of the project 'to re:- duce no kin pollul teen to persons occupying project;? Yes If so, ploisset describe. inI:ulated wrill::; L;crrtn walls. 1 - i Are theme: measure u propotocd to the design of the project to redu< < noise poll.utio t:c 'L1ei-aans outside of the Project which is c_:iiist.d by noise gellel:aLud by thu project? 1a"; ' If. so,. please: describe, Screen wally; S l.nsulat,ed huilding walls. I i i 1 t`rx , Momorarxlum Dale. June 10, 1985 To. Mike Adams Protect .... Paahm Court, Huntington Beach lrorrr••+C.J• Kamage:s AIA Re Open/Peereation Spacrs - -Calculations '1• f'2'ivrrtt•tiJ�es►�:E+,Zc �r (hal.:ostivs Fi torra ces) A. !lhit A: 48XIOfiq,s:, f. - 5,184q.s.f. ' .....p, Ur it.H: 131X63.75y..s.1'. = 8,35ig.s.f, C'. U kAy-r : 26XI32q..q.f. - 3,432g.s.f. •�•••Li. AS;1shW1: 30X779. .,f. 2,1609.s.f.✓ C. NtUY'tfbf3 5,250g.s.f. .•F. Arblde (2nd level). . OstrVs.f. less lot Manning contingency - 4,725g.s.f. • 29,1009.s.f. 11 Common open space A. Ground .Level 27,172 B. Second level: 31250 less 10% contingency 28,125 C, Fourth level: 15,300 lesu 10% contingency 13,770 1 69,067g.s.f. III Common interior ,mace A. Ground level 7,800 S. Second level 2,425V' (dining & tower) C. Third level (Tower) 1 ,075 D. Fourth level (Tower) 1,075 12,375g,s.f• TOTAL 1.10,542g,s.f. CC: T. Tornel. , M. Mosher J. Corpus e AM PALM COURT DEVELOPMENT PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN According to Huntington Beach Planning Department staff analysis the Palm :Court project will require 251 spaces based on the senior citizen suffix and other code parking requirements . The plan as submitted provides 262 parking spaces. Further, the Huntington Beach code requires that the ' required parking for residential units be secured. The project will meet this requirement by providing gated access at the northerr. end of the project, at Pecan Street, with an additional gate south of• the access to the lower garage which r will provide more than the required 123 secured spaces within ? the lower garage and the northern most- portion of the surface { . parking area. I The balance of the surface parking in the middle of the project and in the parking structure will be devoted to visitors, employees and •,retail customers. These groups will be adequately parked on, site per code at locations proximate to their destinations . Retail customers will enter the project either at the southern edge at the new Lake-Orange intersection or in the. middle of the project. On summer weekends when beach parking is at premium, management will take appropriate measures to discourage nonretail poachers and will use the typical, one. hour limit for those who are not �0 NQ a� 50w02bb061285 -1- ti•• R s.+n.•n.• ..�at1� i i 1) bona fide customers or visitors to the project. This will be strictly enforced. Apart from the vehicular attributes of the Palm court Project it is anticipated that both van and limousine service will be provided to Palm Court tenants. A -van will be employed to make regularly scheduled trips to preferred retail centers and other key destination points identified in cooperation with the tenants. The limousine service will be available on a reservation basis for more specialized and individualized trips. i I r I ' I t r ,g3 50w02bb061285 -2- l V BWC/Vanderwood Development Co. June 14, 1985 CALIFORNIA C10NGREGATE CARE PROJECTS , No. of Car-to -No. of. Resident Apartment Project city Apartments Cars Ratio r: Ocean House Santa Monica 121 7 . 057 I Sierra Pasadena 2.16 49 . 226 Bonita Villa Del Escondido 84 24 . 285 Rey Villa Del Napa 81 31 . 384 i Rey Villa Del Merced 94 32 . 340 Rey i Villa Del Visalia 100 27 . 270 ey ,i Villa Laguna 350 90 . 358 . % Valencia Hills alm Court Huntington 205 ? .600 Bench I (2695d ) i 510A i I '+ 1• i I I .. I i sw I i 0 1 I I i i ATTACHMENT 2 lie i f l� I i 1 S j i A Y� w Y { • r 4 • i • C. . 1 I1 ,IfiK .0 .i I; T- ?• A 1.•�' ]I � ' *' t� �'S � {� tt � y1`' * 4 t,' y�'#'q i. !" { * r � .IIFr1, ~ t "' t� r1 t`'. r+41XiF,M.Y �� �k ';r LS" 5, !`•. if ,• � L '.d.'y wk�•' •�y4 J. ,t'•`I#.• 4 !d4 ti a 1• 1 �. 7 (V.., fi '# I r{�1 1.'`.'k :�w f���S. p 4�� •*,� Jh{��'� �rr II . +1 `� ! r`v'fit Y V � d 1,... � �' �{�'+ 7 1 �.Y' t .1 � , •r .i 1 � ��Y o "� C. � (. ! • r' E{ '..�1 { ty� i a. t i; �+•� • 1 l 7 1t t�7 Y,4 Ft' y V „y lit n IYYa"s: V � J !. •,t A4 } � , 'T * i � Y �..+ a llf u � � �' '. � l' Y i, '� •,'• •� 1'j I':Y 1� d 1 } , rh. ,o-� Y�'� ..,,• "� •��� \• �tV;-F5 � `:r �'I� �, , ��1� i r ' 11 ���u4n'�11�'d���. �yd+ ,IM '•1 a 1 t i �YT` °+ 1 y�4�'�P r: �A �rV � { 1 !. J � Y •d T '}` is-..�, 1*•. �' t,... . 1`"'� 4�1 'Y ` .- •,w hlr 1 } �', dt r ,Y� � •�, L'" � t it 1 �[{b a. �7 ylG�, �.• 1 Y f: � � ., 1 i'. h 4 t.,+y ... 44 u i f+ # • i 4 l c V7 S„ k y r 1� �j � ti ,k �"Wr1y ,kK JG `� � f 1 f Y � • ' i y ';' I Y lr , r � al Iry�r,�'� �P 1y1 y,� yyr7 S `'•ry - �1 t �,�^ !' { t ��'��ti yys1 e ' y + ' t r e , M �a t 4y� ad y t •4 '1 a 4�ry �.Fr F t��r +�1 Ir�`y�r� Y y i• 't � �iA4 x�"'44 , y�) ��1 � + dy i`{�Ytyt r. '041- Iy' ill• " 1. Y�, Y+ } y,P'Yl •t * � { li' r � '� x r "•.L�•rr�I �L i 9 � il,.rN `4 r�r� ,:, d ��+{ at �! �h Ylx t 5'��` y 1d '� �M 1'7 \ .{ V , 541 - '; n•• ^ " -1r 1 YYJ l L IYl1`` t� + !L t 1 +• y y ?��ti, iw 1,•S !� x�, vf+ 5 ,f{�h� � Y•t t� S T `' 1 . �, t 1 1 >, 1 �:.,� � V�.,, j V1 .� , y.'t r );� � y •1y, i' IA SY �'t 9 7 1 v,� �f a•+s. �}'+. ' � .µC �tC v tiZ + �' p � �i,A 4 � �I,r�4� V�h� ' � 1M,,.�jY'ti'7"4.,.1 Y� �:•��� l ! l r 11�'t ��'q `:.,1� s �. " Ji 1, I rL �� �1'*1 1,� yMl # � { � +a� �', � it ' 4 z` ,-•I�, r r�. M ze " � + h wttV I'� �f ;1 �� ..� V Y^� itd�f�i "� ,�t +� Y' 1,S+z� ► t,J�, 41 r ,T4.;� r i ''� R:� hrd+T �I'h.�' rq yV', + � � '*• t 4 , k � 1 � � �}w� �'�"{�ti'+ r + � � it 4 T � .'� +: 44�� �•,r► �� � ��' ecyh`� �1_.III.LL.1.�W-i��1JYwihYJM.rh1+11A1M1-�.Y+l-�'.u.i+�..1:11{•.t�i-�au L'.�Y...�.''li `�1 �,{ �1i..al71Y i�MY..v.�_..�]•1L�.Y•"� /..r.a. �.�i �.�' .I.+��L�.Y�I.M.,Y'�-AI'h+..r'i4�M-IK�..�Si��T. C-1 CCNDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-24/TENTATIVE TRA.. ' I1O. 12268/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 110. 85-27/COASTAL DE.'PLOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-7/NEGATIVE DECLARATIOIJ N0, 84-34 COURT Applicant: BWC/Vanderwood The subject request is for a mixed use development consistir • of 205 senior apartment units, 30 assisted care units , 30 convalesc.-. `. rare units, 14,500 square feet retail commercial and 2,400 square f -,t offine. Because the project is located in two distinct zoning districts, and is a mixed use project, there are several ways to analyze it for compliance with development standards. Staff used formula arrived at by taking a proportional percentage of the site area in relationship to the zoning of. both Oldtown Specific Plan District II or Downtown specific Plan District VI Access into the project will be from two locations: north end of Lake Street and the intersection of Atlanta and Orange Avenues. Lake Street is designed as a secondary arterial with a 90 foot right-of-way with a 7 foot sidewalk capable of accommodating 15,000 to 20,000 vehicle trips per day. Atlanta Avenue will be a primary arterial (100 foot right-of-way) able to accommodate between 20,000-25,000 vehicle trips per day. It is anticipated that summer beach-traffic will use Atlanta Avenue. On June 18, 1985 the Planning Commission continued the subject applications with the developer 's consent due to the length of the agenda and to allow time for a meeting between the applicant and concerned property owners. Staff has rer 'sed the findings and conditions of approval. The Commission asked staff if an agreement could be made that would go with the land if for some reabon the use was changed and a conversion to apartments or a hotel is requested. The commission arcked staff if they could lock the project into senior housing. Mike Adams of staff stated that staff could add a condition to state any proposed change of use will require a new entitlement. Chairman Livengood asked staff if the statement on granting affordable housing for 35 yearu was a true statement. Secretary Palin stated yes. Commissioner Erskine asked staff what mechanics were going to be used to keep the public out of the facility. :Toward ?elefsky of staff stated the applicant should respond to the question. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED i Ken Skolyan spoke in opposition of the project. His concerns included parking, parking structure, primary use of the hospital and the height of the building. + 9 PC - July 2 , 1985 •-2- (2859d) ' I II rTjf. w 1 l i kY 1. y , 4 , ...._ _,�i, Pat Marshall spoke in support o% the proje .:t stating seniors need this type of development. Cecilia Fuir spoke in support of the _ :oject stating that it would be a wonderful addition to the Downtown area. Kevin Kelly spoke in opposition to the project stating that he feels parking will not be adequate due to experiences with his mother in similar complexes. Charles Pelky spoke in opposition to the project regarding the variances. Robert F. Beremy spoke in support of the project He stated that it is a good project but expressed concern about the parking. Mary Rose Skolyan spoke in opposition to the project. Don Slaven spoke in opposition to the project. Tory Windfield, applicant, referred to future projects that could be built in this area if this proposal was not approved. He stated that the standards by which the senior project was being developed w:,s a much smaller ratio in all ways compared to condominiums or apartments. Commissioner Erskine question the applicant. it there was a full } medical staff. Tom Windfield stated that z full senior citizen ! staff is required by the state of California. A licenced medical supervisor or nurse is on the site at all times. Commissioner Erskine asked in the event one of the congregate residents breaks a ► i bone and there is nobody there to handle this, does the patient have { to be transported to another hospital . Tom Windfield atated that an emergency medical facility is located on the site. Commissioner � ! Erskine asked if a doctor would be on call. Tom Windfield stated yes a doctor would be on call for all emergencies, Commissioner Erskine questioned pedestrian control along retail. site. Tom Windfield stated that this was subject to Modification. le stated that a portion of the facility would be a key or number punch. Guest access would come through a security facility located in the lobby. Commissioner Erskine questioned the security of the facility. Tom Windfield stated that the intent is to have the property secured on a 24 hour basis. Susan Corral stated than she felt the project should be continued For further study and analysis. Sue Prato stated that she met with the developer and did not feel satisfied e t She stated that she was still concerned about the parking and the height of the building and the density of the project. Doctor Morms Ehrlich stated that he was concerned with the outcome of the project if it is not workable. ' 4 PC - July 2, 1985 -3- (2859d) J Mike Adams also read a letter submitted by by Robert Allen, resident and property owner in the Downtown area., which reflects his support of approval of the Palm Court project. Mike Rogers, senior citizen, spoke in support of the project. There were no other persons to speak for or against the proposal and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Erskine asked staff how they planned to preserve the character of the neighborhood and the safety of the senior citizens. He stated that the design feature of the project is not concurrent with Uie renderings or sit- plan the Commission has been given to date. He stated that the design feature needs to be spelled out by the Com-ission. He stated that the Commission should consider some diagrar: parking with landscape median along Atlanta and Lake Streets. He stated that this should happen whether or not the project is able to handle internal parking. Commissioner Erskine stated that the convalescent care should be limited to 30 only, and only available to residents of the project. He stated that he was ready to recommend support to the city Council. Commissioner Mirjahangir stated that he was concerned about the parking. He stated that he would like to see staff work with the applicant to try and work out an alternate which should be done before construction commences. He stated that the density bonus should show assistance to make this affordable housing. Hn stated that if the city is going to give a 50% density bonus, what is the developer going to give back to the city in payment. I Commissioner Rowe stated that he did not want to be biased against senior citizens, but feels this is not the place for this unit due to parking. Commissioner Winch�tll stated that this project was unique, but in a complicated way. She asked staff if .6 parking ratio would be adequate for active seniors who drive and visitors. She stated that the height limit in Oldtown District 6 does not allow 45 foot. She stated that she would like to see only three stories in the northern area . She stated that the tenant age should be specified. She stated that there should be . ame type or alternative plan in case this is not a marketable plan. she asked what type of revisions is staff going to require. She stated that the greatest density bonus she could support would be 25%. Commissioner Schumacher asked staff what; the city was getting in return for the density bonus. She stated 'chat there was no problem with senior housing in this area. She also commented on the retail downtown stating that there was to much. She suggested eliminating some of the retail which would eliminate some of the parking problem. Chairman Livengood stated that one of his concerns is the density bonus. He stated that he is concerned this project will change. He stated that he would also favor the 25% density bonus b.,d would support the project. r),� PC - July 2, 1985 -4- (2859d) Commissioner Erskine asked Bob Sang-:cr, Attorney, if the City could require a convenant that would; run with the land. Bob Sangster stated yes, that we could make it a recorded development agreement. Commissioner Erskine stated that he would like to ree the convenant be a condition of the conditional use permit. Chairman Livenggood stated that he would like to see a list of what the developer is proposing and what the city is proposing. Commissioner 1inchell discussed the retail required for district 6. Chairman Livengood asked staff if they could come up with a figure for the 25% density bonus. Howard Zelefsky stated that in the Oldtown area it allows (158 units which 39 1/2 uii:s above) . A straw vote was taken on 205 units at 51% Density bonus. AYES: Schumac:ner, Erskine NOES: Rowe, Winchell, Livengood, Mirjahangir ABSENT: Porter ABSTAIN: None 'I MOTION FAILED } commissioner Mlrjahangir risked if the height will still be over 30 feet. Mike Adams stated this will only effect the height on one side there is a portion of the project that is still 45 feet higher located towards Lake away from residential. A straw vote was taken on 192 anits instead of the proposed 205 which is 13 units less. +, AYES: Schumacher, Livengood Erskine, Mirjahangir NOES: Rowe, Winchell ABSENT: Porter i ABSTAIN: None } MOTION PASSED it Commissioner Schumacher asked staff about the stamped conct .:.e standards in the Downtown Design Standards. Mike Adams of staff stated that the project will be subject to Design Review Board approval and that a materials pallet would be submitted. �i. Commissioner Erskine asked staff if the Commission was willing to consider diagonal parking and if this would affect the conditions. Mike Adams stated yes, this would have to meet the satisfaction of Public Works. The Commission discussed the revised condition,a which are reflected ;n the final conditiins adopted. , t %1 ' PC - July 2, 1985 -5- (2859d) Commissioner Erskine stated that staff should incorporate input from the Commission on architect design. He stated that he liked the original archetect renderings submitted to the Commission the first time. Mike Adams asked Commissioner Erskine if he would be available fog- a Design Review Board meeting. Commissioner Erskine stated yes . i Commissioner Wir ,hell requested a condition for the applicant to provide 201 low - ncone housing off-site to satisfy Mello Bill if Bond Financing is not used. She stated that the city needs low not moderate income off-site projects. t Commissioner Erskine stated that the Commission should vote: on the design. Chairman Livengood caked staff if they could word a condition for Project Architectural Review to rove back to the Planning Commission after Design Review Board comments for a final decision. Mike Adams stated yes. A straw vote was taken on the applicant beingrequirL-d to provide 20% low to moderate income units offsite if 4nnd financing fails. AYES: Rowe, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Mirjahangir NOES: Winche' : ABSENT: Porter ABSTAIN: :':+ne i MOTION PASSED A straw vote was taken to resolve the number of nu. iinq beds which would be 60 beds; 30 convalescent and 30 assisted care. } AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, ; Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Porter ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY ERSKINE TO APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-247TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12268/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-27/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 65-7/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84-34 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS BY TFE FOLLCWING VOTE: AYES: Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Mirjahangir NOES: Rowe, Winchell ABSENT: Porter ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED y, j Vj`0 1 Y j' PC - July 2, 1985 -6- (2859ni FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12208: 1. The General Plan has set f -rth pr-)visions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for the implementation of this type of development. Therefore, the project as proposed complies with the 'ity's General Plan of Land Use designation of Medium Density Residential. 2. The lot size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design and implementation features of the subdivision are proposed to be constricted in compliance with standard plans and specifications on file with the City, as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and City Subdivisions. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-24: 1. The proposed mixed use development consisting of 192 apartment units with a total of 60-beds for both the convalescent and assisted care facility having a 41% density bonus and 14,500 square feet of retail area is compatible with surrounding land uses and is in conformance with the General Plan policies because the proposed improvements are consistent with the intent of Downtown Specific plan and Oldtown Dpecific Plan. 2. The proposed mixed use development consisting of 192 apartment units with a total of 60-beds for both the i convalescent and assisted care facility having a 41% density bonus and 14,500 &quare feet of retail area will not be detrimert-al to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persona residing or working in the neighborhood because the project will be in compliance with the regulations set forth in the Ordinance Code as approved by the Planning Commission. 3. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed development does properly adapt the structures to streets, driveways, and other uses in a harmonious manner. Lake and Atlanta hvenues, being a primary means of access, are arterial highways and have sufficient capacity to accommodate project-generated traffic. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL CONDITIONAL, EXCEPTION NO. 85-27: 1. The granting of the Conditional Exception for deviation in the height limit of 30 feet will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent upon other properties in the Ij vicinity and under an identical zone classification. The I project will maintain a 30 foot height limit for the portion of the building adjacent to the Oldtown District. i t i PC - July 2, 1985 -7- (2859d) a f 2. There are exceptional circumstanceb which apply to this property that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed on other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications because of the realignment of the street pattern. 3. Granting Conditional Exception No. 85-27 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property the same zone classificat{ons because the proposed will not adversely impact surrounding property and is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Downtown Specific Plan District 6 and Oldtown Specific Plan District 2. 4. Conditional Exception No. 85-27 is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Gene:al Plan and approval of Conditional Exception Ho. 85-27 %+ill not result in any modification to the requirements of the Coastal Land Use Plan. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL COASTAL DEVEL0 :X11-." PERMIT NO. 85•-2: 1. The proposed mixed uce project is consistent with the City Coastal Zone suffix and the Downtown Specific Plan Standards except as provided foz in Conditional Exception No. 85-27 as well as other provisions cf the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property; and conforms with the plans, policies, requirements anti standards of the City's Coastal Land Use Plan. 2. The proposed development can be provided with infrastructure i in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Land USe Plan. 3. The proposed aevelopr,tri.t conforms with the public access and ' public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. � SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-15: 1. The Site Plan, Flo�,r Plans and Elevations date, June 10, 1985 shall be modified to include the items lifted below, then resubmitted subject to review and approval by the Director of Development Services which reflects: a. A parking ratio for the apartment units of 1 space/studio and 1 bedroom units 2 spaces/2 bedroom units As an alternative, prior to issuance of huilding permits the applicant/developer shall er,:er into an agreement with the j city 'of Huntington Beach (to be reviewed by the City I Attorney's office as to form and content) which will commit b the developer/applicant to fund the cost of a parking study +1 PC July 2, 1985 -8- (2859d) e (administered by City Staff) at 90% occupancy of the 192 apartment units. Said study will be used an a decision making tool to determine the amount of financial participation (Ix any) the developer/applicant will have toward a public parking facility up to the difference between the number of spaces proposed and the number of spaces required by code. An annual review shall be conducted thereafter to determine any future participation subject to the discretion of the Director of Development Services. b. A fully dimensionad Flan reflecting compliance with open space requirements. c. Turning radius of 29 feet for retail parking areas. d. A total of 60 beds for the convalescent care facility. e. A total of 192 senior apartment units. i f. The number and location of all trash bins;. ! g. The elimination of all office square footage above the commercial. + 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, a copy of the i guidelines for tenant occupancy shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services and reviewed by the City + Artorney's office as to form and content. it shall include prnvisions for: establishing the minimum age requirements j (55 years) , prohibiting peroons from residing in the convalescent care/assisted care facility without first being a tenant of the apartment project for a minimum of six months or have a lease to that effect. This requirement of a minimur- age shall run for 30 years. 3. A parking management plan shall be submitted and be subject to the review and approval of the Department of "evelopment .services. It shall address: a. Signing b. Control of parking by use c. Van and limousine service d. Parking by unit assignment e. Security 4. Orange Avenue/Atlanta Avenue shall be dedicated auo cor+btructed as a 100 foot primary arterial highway to Public. Works standards and subject to the Downtown Design Guidelines. 5. Lake Street shall be dedicated and constructed as a 90 foot Primary arterial highway to public Works standards and subject to the Downtown Design Guidelines. "�� PC - July 2 , 1985 -9- (2859d ) a. Pecan Avenue shall be dedicated and constructed to Public Works standards. 6. Vacation proceedings will be initiated by the city of F.untington Beach for the vacation of Chicago Avenue (Grose Avenue) and a portion of Lake Street. The remaining portion of Chicago Avenue (Gross Avenue) between Lot 1 (Block 301) and Lot 17 (Block 201 ) of the Vista Del Mar Tract shall be cul-de--saced to Public Works standards 7. Patterned concrete within public right-of-way shall be limited to locations and design established in the Downtown Design Guidelinea. I� S. All required landscaping shall be installed on site, not within public right-of-way, and maintained by the developer. A detailed landscape plan and sprinkler plan shall be submitted in accordance with the Downtown Design Guidelines. 9. Water mains shall be constructed in Pecan Avenue, Lake Street and orange/Atlanta Avenue to tie into existing systems. 10. Storm drain facilities shall be constructed as required by the Departr.-nt of Public Works. 11. The primary driveway and access widths shall be a minimum of 27 feet wide. The parking lot aisles shall be 27 feet wide in the commercial area. 12. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed ' throughout the complex to comply with Pamphlet 13, Standards of the National Fire Protection Association. 13. The elevator cars shall be a minimum of 6180 wide by 413" deep to allow the use of an amb+tlance stretcher which hat a minimum size 22• x 78" in its horizontal position. 14 . Fire hydrants shall be approved and installed as per Fire Departnent specifications. 15� Any entry gate shall be approves and comply with Fire Department Standardn. ].o. A set stan-.ipipe system shall by installed in the stairway landings an narking garages as per Uniform Building CoC4 Standards. 17. A public addreLs System and voice communications system shall be instal.e ? throughout health care and residential area. v� PC - July 2, 1985 -10-- (2859d) i 18. An automatic fire alarm system approved by the Fire Department is to be installed throughout. 19. No par:; :ng area shall be designated. Fire lanes shall be posted per Fire Department standard J415. 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall enter an agreement to provide low jr moderate income housing units in order to comply with Y-�llo Bill requirements with regard to coastal areas. The applicant shall provide housing units for Fersoas of low or moderate inco:ae subject to the provi-sions of Government section 65590 (d) . The applicants compliance with Section 65590 (d) of the Government Code in terms of amount and location of affordable housing provided shall be subject to the review and approval of the Department of Development services. This agreement shall be reviewed by the City Attorney's office as to form and content and approved by the Director of Development services. 21. Low volume heads shall be used in all showers. 22. All building spoils, such as unused lumber, wie-=, pipe, and other surplus or unusable materials, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 23. Energy efficient lighting, such as high pressures sodium vapor lamps, shall he used in parking lot and re::reation arez. A lighting plan shall be sub;rl.tted to Development Services which illustrates that spillage onto adjacent properties will not occur. 24. Al structures on the subject Property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the state acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 45 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for a building permit. 25. An e►lgineering jtulogist shall be engaged to suk.mit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factor as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shad be submitted to the City for review prior to issuance of building permits. �V PC -- July 21 1905 -11- (2859d) • 26. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the locations of the clothes dryers. This requirement may be waived provided that the applicant will install a more energy efficient alternative subject to the review and approval of the Department of Development Services. 27. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the location of cooking facilities, port-a-i,eaters, and central heating units. This requirement may be waived provided that the applicant will provide a more energy efficient alternative subject to the review and approval of the Department of Development Services. 28. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this Conditional Use Permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinarce or Municipal Codes occur. Any proposed change of use, ir.ensity or significant change in design shall require a new :ondikional use permit subject to Planning Commission .eview. 29. If the applicant does not obtain bond financing for the project, the requirement for 20% of the units (38 total units) to be made available to persons earning leas than 801 of the Orange County median income figure may be satisfied off site subject to Approval of the Director of Development Services. The lose of bond financing will not relieve the applicant of the responsibility tG provide affordable housing in conjunction with this project. 30. Prior to the issuance of building permits a materials pailot indicating final color choices of the building materials and product types along with detail design features and shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for comment with final review and approva by the Planning Commission. CONDITIONS OP APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12268: .1. The Tentative Tract No. 12268 received and dated May 24, 1985, shall be the approved layout. 2. A copy of the recorded tract map shall by filed with the Department of Development Services prior to issuance of building permits. 3. On-site water Rystem shall be constructed and ded.cated per Public Works zequirements. 4. On-cite sewer system shall be private, but is subject to Public Works requirements. I� �1 i t PC - July 2, 1985 -12- (2859d) 1 ATTACHMENT 3 I I i 1 l� .. .. • .. .. ........ «.._._..-a..�. • • .. a.......... ._... ....- •• .• .... .. • .. ..!�n.•..ter tw m� I • ln� r • r 7 � ,\`` _, ice.�� �� � i `�/ r �. t�'''' \�`,�• •„ .\ a /�`'ta /� � •(////•- .. •. • • ' .+ � • :.... wxx f EPI E111 \ •��' � � J j/ • �� •— I'll} EEE '. !!Itli ; '- � �\ t` V / EXHIBIT NO. 3 rl' GROUND FLOOR PLAN �� �. � o :o ba tno P A L M _ n N 9 F a r N k t F O . -4 t .. v ty i t D U ) ' Lt .. k 1 0p r 'j'tii �'n -T •r.(iL ' / `• r t t o t I 1 I j I i i I i ATTACHMENT g I n° OVERVIEW OF THE CONGREGATE CARE MARKET The age structure of the American popudation is changing rapidly. Through advances in medicine and changes in lifestyle, the proportion of the total population repre- sented by the elderly has and will continue to increase. In 1900 persons over 65, represented only 4% of the population and totaled only 3 million. Today there are over 27 million Persons over 65 representing in excess of 11% of the population. It is expected that by the year. 2000 this age group will approach 35 million persons or 13% of the total population. Attachment 2 illustrates this emerging pattern. HOUSING IMPORTANCE AND PREFERENCE I Housing is ' widely recognized as the numLer one financial expenditure* for the elderly, accounting for over 30% of the av rage budget. However, housing is more than just an econom-ic.• consideration. It is a major variable physi- cally, socially, and p!-;ychologically in the lives of older people, and is an integral part of the quality of their lifd. Research indicates that, in general, . the type •of housing preferred by the majority of elderly persons is that which permits maximum independence. For many, this indepen- dence is best achieved by living in one' s home. However, as an individual ages and becomes less inclined, motivated or able to. undertake the chores of daily living, the convenience of a service package and on-site health care offered outside j of the home becomes a viable alternative. j I . EVOLUTION OF HOUSING ALTERNATIVES Historically, only limited housing alternatives for f the elderly have been available. An early alternative was f ' the home for the aged. These facilities provided vital ser- vices for more infirmed older persons whc required a protec- tive setting, help with personal care:, skilled medical care, and nursing and rehabilitation services. During tht 'middle of this century, nursing homes began to develop. Thlp5e facilities provided continuous pro- fessional care for residents. Today nursing homes :are for ' approximately 1 .3 million elderly. These patients are elder- ly, mostly female Eby a factor of three to one) , generally alone (with 500% having Ao close relatives ) and white (96%) . J 50w03f05.0185 EXHIBIT 140. 4 i +t I The majority move to a :cursing home fac.Llity from a Private residence (5C%) rather than from hospitals or other f nursing homes. They. are often disabled (55% ark mentally impaired and 33% are incontinent) . Few will leaf e. It is estimated chat 20 to 40 percent of these residents could live in less dependent, non-institutionalized environment:; if such alternatives were available. Beginning in the 19501s, retirement communities qnd congregate housing facilities begun to emerge. I-n 1975 the i First National Conference on Congregate Housing for Qid People was held in Washingtc:., D.C. At the conference the following definition' of congregate housing was utilized: " an' assisted independent living environment, that offers the elderly who are functionally impaired oz :socially deprived, but other wise in good health, the residential accommodations and sup- porting services the-/ need to maintain a semi-iiiaependent lifestyle and prevent i premature *or unnecessary institutional- ization as they grow older. " Hence, congregate housing, the most modern of retirement housing concepts, is a notion of ft,:l service group living for older persons. It encompasses a variety of environments. It is intended to serve the needs of the elderly who desire a full service environment in order to best cope with the demands of daily living. Its major goal is to maintain independence in a residential setting and prevent unnecessary or premature institutionalization which often results in excessive costs and accelerated deteriora- tiOn tq the individual and society. , RETIREr,ImT LIVING CON2REGATE SERVICES The modern congregate housing concept has been .'developing during the past few years and is gaining wide- spread acceptance as the concept becomes a reality. Residents are living comfortably in congreate facilities and potential residents are learning the benefits of these projects. However, the number of these facilities is still very limited. The National Council on Aging has concluded that:, u if the combination of residential ' accommodations and supportive services cha_•acterist;ic of congregate housing is not provided, a large number of the 5Gw03f050'185 � I I •f elderly will be unnecessarily institu- tionalized • in the future ( Indeed, ) it only makes sense that the elderly be able;-7 '.:o move into some sort of care-free housing. Retirement housing is a rapidly growing market but we have not even begun to keep up .w;ith the demand. " The prim•, reason behind the growing demand for con- gregate housing is clearly illustrated in an article in Indianapolis Magazine, Septeriber, 1980 entitled "I Wart To He On My Own (But I Need, A Littlr Help)" . The author surveyed ten congregate retirement homes in operation and under con- struction and found waitinglists�xs ranging up to three years. ' f The author also points to an interview with ) elderly woman about to tour one of the Indiaaa facilities. , The elderly woman declared, "You couldn' t get me to live in one of those places, Sure I am old, but I don' t want to live with old, sick, dying, people. You couldn't keep me in a retirement home. My mother .lived in a nurs-ng home so I know what they're all abou t�,, Thirty minutes at a retirement_ community was apparent) enough tO enlighten this retired widow wtio had stubbornly held fast to her home of fcrty YL; meat home • was just: a nice word admitted. for "nuisingh lhomeretislze ? "I had no ides. they were likj this. I think it i would be a lovelY place to live I thought places like this I were only in the movies ' , or in California. " i i CONGREGATE CI1RE L'S. LIFECARF VS. CONTINUING CARE Along with the developing industry has come the {; inevitable jargon. A brief lexicon: Conareaate Care - refined above as s ' living for older persons, assisted group Lifecare -- An early ,:oncept, now losing which required�i vet}► sizeable front-end buy-in g p°polarity, tion fee. Some fees were so 1a'- y-in or accomoda-- i annuity in lieu of rental,. charge5l�at I�os of the operatedprojects like an entering tile ,market toi.,� -ire straight; rental arrangements. Cotitinuina Ca-, ,! Congregate Care previae an enhanced --•.; FroJecta that living, up to and includin•- �N package beyond independent Court. g skilled nursing care - e_cl_ Palm 50wd30501e5 -3» L#. V if ELDERLY WEALTH dis- cussed, 111Ii While the !greying" of America tias been widely cussed, what is not .understood is that most of t.lje:se older Americans are not economically deprived and are daI better as a whole. During financ: ally than tl�e population within the 1970's the elderly improved their income standing pen general population. • :AS ata result t d prog ams, cthe relderly were plans and other elderl-1 . made better of : as shown by: 6` in mean family income ox 13a,Q .to An increase r� $19,752 in :1979. 0 An increase in mean family income to �7% of the national. average. position in society The elderly have, improved their economic public and private: due to several factors including rising poften in pension benefits and ti7reat�r accumulatiohom�swea The spending the form o£ large equities in their ompar •- power of ellerl.y families tends to be understated in c ision to all families, as the elderly have access to two other sources of. funds that are accumulation in income of wealth than jections.. They have a larger society at large, and they draw down this wealth to supple ment their incomes. l han Elderly incomes also tend to more table tand ttie il,come of society at large. social securyty payments public• and private pension plans are indexedunlikely inflation.that the This indexing of income makes it very i the Also, elderly will experience a decline 1 homed, income. savingor saving assets of the elderly, typically accounts; tend to increase in value at a rate equal to oz' .; above inflacion. SOURCE: ATTACIiIIENTemprandum2n, Re datedg an t'larchd14, 1985 . Inc. Economic Consultants tl I f • 4 50w03£050185 w4 1 ♦ t, THE PALm COURT DEVELOPMEj,l CONGREGATE CARE FACILITY i The Palm Court development is keyed into the demo- graphic and financial realities outlined above. Proximity to the Pacific Ocwaa, the Hantin ton Beach :ier and the City's ! aggressive downtown redevelopment project place Palm Court in the ideal location to attract active and affluent retirees. The facility will be designed and appointed like a ! fine Mediterranean hotel . Unlike Oovermient subsidized ,senior 17 citizen projects with maximum income limits t ht are meet the needs Of those with meager incomes, Palm Courtdis designed for those with incomes of $25,000 at the very mum. Due to the quality of th.:s mini- mum. incomes far in excess of that project residents IntsgacL well 4, OJ0 dwelling units managed by the two leading companies in . the field have an average household income of $38,000. One of these, a compgrable project vith 200 residents in j Zianville,� I�ndiana finds that they have nearly 2,00Q accounts in a branch� bank. The Palm Court continui.n care concept Gated on combining a variety of retirement housing1alterna- ii fives which encompass a wide spectrum of living styles within a single project. These include: Livin 221 ments all with ill kitchens land balconies- 0-bedroom apart- Independent designed £or elderl self- sufficient Y. persot:s who are ambulatory are lent but want the convenience of a service pa•kageeand +j on-site health care. '+ nurses station by an emergency callsystem. connected- to the ` living LI-.-v These 32 units are smaller than independent living units, are located in a z eparate wing, but have all the amenities of the larger ' Resi- dents in the as g units except for kitchens. Resi- sisted .living units are those who require more personal attent...in and service than those living in the inde- pendent living Bill "s. The residents in this area ar,. vided with all tri - 2 pru- services including astistance iPaln Court thiner,�'Ces plus Personal 1 ta►�ce in dining, supervision of medication dadminisration- and reality orientation They ;gave their own dining area. i Hea?th Care Center: separate and distinct 32 room are 1�used according to C011fornia nursing care standards. The center will provide intewi„adiete health care service exclu- sively for Palm t,'ourt residents on an as-heeded b' " are offered on a private ar semi asz:. Beds private basis depending on 50w03f05Q185 l -5- i availability. Transfer agreements will be established with I local hospitals to provide acute care if needed. Patients { / are admitted and disgharged from the health care center based on doctors orders. If a resident living along iA an apart- ment is admitted to. the health care center and the doctor decides the transfer should be permanent, the resident pays the established rate "in the health care center and the apart- ment is leased again'. If the resident is temporarily trans- ferred to the health- care center, the resident pays a reduced daily rate while continuing the let--se payments on the apartment. Residential Services: A professional staff will provide a wi3e range of act ties encouraging residents to realize all of their potential while recognizing the reali- ties of the aging process. An extensive servico package is an integral part of the Palm Court living cuncept. Residents can purchase additional services but the following axe included in the montrly lease fee: * two meals daily with menu selections and quality compar- able to the finest restaurants I * weekly housekeeping services, weekly flat laundry service, I' * recreation activities and programs including a health { club, exercise room, sauna and library transportation to local stopping and cultural events, * 24-hour security, and * 24-hour health care services. To accommodate these services, common space is provided in the facility. The common areas include a dining room, lobby areas, library and . recreation facilities. The associated Palm Court Ar 7ada retail development is planned to include a branch bank, gift shop, pharmacy, b.auty shop, convenience store and other uses which will serve Palm Court residents as well as the general public. PALM COURT RETAIL ARC'T 7E As part of the developer's partnership with the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, the project will include approximately: 27, 000 square feet of commercial space V along the Orange Avenue frontage. The 200-300 re ,idents of 50w03f050285 . -6- it 1M• Palm Court, their visiting family and friends, along with the significant surrounding existing and expanding residential community, is e::pected to adegriately support the commercial space at the reduced income levels projected in the attached proforma until such time as more of the plans for the pier and redevO opment are rumpleted. The developers have there- fore projected a conservative absorption rate for this space (25% year 1, 50% year. 2, 75% year 3, 85% year 4) . r{ 1 1 • 4 . b 50wO3fO5Ul85 _7_ i FINANCING, AND PROJECTIONS BWC/VAND:;RWOOD intends to finance the diArelopinent through a combination of tax exempt bonds. Of the total project cost of $27,888, 000 almost 90 n be financed through tax.. " exempt *bonds which have 0already a been induced by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment agency. These bonds- will be issued by the Redevelopment Agency and underwritten and sold •by either by an investment banking firm or a bank's Capital Group such as Citicorp, Security pacific, First Interstate or Manufacturers Hanover. The key to • successful marke'_ing of the bonds and obtaining the most favorable interest rate is tz have the bonds rated AA or -burin AAA by Standard & Poors or by ' 9 he past s. several years sophisticated major banks Moody' surety rc+mpanies with - AA or better ratings and surety bond i companies with AAA ratings have developed programs whereby the bank issues a letter of credit or the surety company f issues a Surety Bond to guarantee interest on the project bonds. payment or, principal and credit enhancements" as they haveQom t toc be known These j the project bond to be rated ' permit rated bonds are then underwritten oandrlsoll by the inveor AAA. stment houses at' rates currently ranging From 4.9% on "floating rate Put bonds" to 10% for mid to long 'germ fixed rates . Attach- ments 4 and 5, which are excerpts from publications by Manu- facturers Hanover and Citicorp contain a more thorough discus- sion regarding the alternatives, structures and hedges avail- able in the selection *of rates and maturities. Whether ones ' strategy is to fix the interest rate and maturity, or opt .for a floating rate program .like First Boston's Adjustable Gonvertable F or use an interest rate swap xtendable Security (ACES), i e or ca to protect against excessive floating hinterester for o rate dincreases it . is important to obtain the rating so that the bond Carl be marketed by security dealers along with the existing Pool of. rated tax- exempt bonds. As the attached proformas indicate, the p cash-on-cash return of. 29.6 at Year 9 and the 28.6/ internal rate ,of return make Palm Court a highly competitive invest- ment. These projections are based on a 10% band interest rate, wh�cli 1n the present market: can be obtained oil a fixed rate basis .for a mid 'to long term maturity. However, if a floating rated bond currently at 5% or even one With a 6 .5% floor and lo/ cap is secured, the potential cash-on-cash ously far greater.return is obvi j IN f. 50w03f050285 ; f 1 i The proformas have also been based on what our man- agement company and we believe are. the most conservat"ve assumptions. For instance, we ;,ave included a $700,000 mar- keting budget and projected a 2 year fill--up period: We have assumed average monthly rents, including two meals of $1500 although existing ecmparable facilities with occupancy of up to 98% are charging higher rates. r; ' I ' 1 1 • I b 50w03f050'1E5 -9- I� • � 1 W • I i ATTACHMENT 5 i i { t It i i I V A N D E P W 0 0 D C O r4 P A N Y• %%'Lr Street Suite 1201 . G15 Sauth Flo , Los n elns California 90017 • 1213' Z24-1001 ' ;July 12 , 1985 Mr. James w. Palwn Sect etary Huntington Beach.-,Planning i Commission , . P.O. Box 190 ~' lion t C ington Beach., A 92648 bear Mr . Pali:c: BBC/Vanderwood hereby appeals the P1nnning Corr.:%iss?on ' s action of July 2, 1985 on Conditional Use No. 65-24/:'ent.ativf, Tract No. 1226b/Conditional T::;cet-)t :on i Ito. 85- 27/Coasts! Development Fermin No. ii5-7/1Nega+ ive Doclar,tt :an J;o.- 64--3-; for the ?alm Court and all re•1 ar,ad actions . � The co-,iitions as written ! 11 riot F)er IT,it• t h 0 development of L:le parcel per applinable local. 1cs;.: se regulations and adopted City policies and standards which have been applied to other developments . We earnestly request an appeal hearing as soon j its possible and enclose, our check no. 123 in the amount. of $165 . 00 in payment of the appeal fee. ' Sincerely, ` •ANTHOI:Y CANZICAZERI 'Managing Partner AC:ms EXHIBIT NO. 5 E. Enclosure • i PALM COURT, HUNTINGTON BEACH GUIDELINES FOR TENANT OCCUPANCY The Palm Court development is keyed into the d.-imographic reality of a burgeoning senior population and the financial reality of greater senior affluence. Proximil.y 'tc the Pacific Ocean, the Pier and the City's aggressive downtown redevelopment project, place Palm Court in the ideal location to Attract active and effluent retirees. The facility will be designed and appointed like a fine Mediterranean hotel.. Unlike government subsidized senior citizen projects with maximum income limits that are intended to meet the needs of those with lesser incomes, Palm Court is designed for those with incomes of $25,000 or greater. The Palm Court Continuing care concept is predicated on combining a variety of retirement housing alternatives which en.:umpass a wide spectrum of living styles within a single project. Each component will have its own occupancy requirements. INDEPENDENT GIVING UNITS: All prospective tenants must un ergo medical as -well as financial screening. A medical exam and personal interview will be required to establish ! that the individual is fully ambulatory, mentally alert and self-sufficient. ASSISTED LIVING UNITS: All prospective tenants will be drawn rom TEe Palm Court Independent Giving component or from the outside if madical evaluation certifies that the individual is on the mend and should be able to occupy an independent living unit within six months. NURSING COMPONENT: All tenants, without excuption, will be raven rum wi to the Palm Court development and must have been residents of the development for a minimum of six months or have a lease to that effect. o D Jul. 61985 ty CITY OF 11UNT1t1GT0td BEAN q 50w04m072485-2 I ' �I I I I i 7 PALM COURT ISSUES AND ANSWERS At the June 18 and July 2, Planning Commission Public Hearings, several important issues were raised by Planning Commissioners and neighbors. This brief report will attempt to respond to eacn of these key issues. 1. DENSITY - The Palm Court project as submitted, with 205 independent lving unite requires a 50% density bonus. This ')onus is well within the authority of the Cit-, based on the senior bonus legislation implemented by the legislature last year, and is certainly well below the density permitted at other senior projects approved and constructed in Huntington Beach. As indicated by Commissioner Schumacher, the controlling issue here is intensity of population rather than unit density. Existing zoning would permit 136 apartments on the site with no control regarding the number of bedrooms or unit size. By using the non-discretionary affordable housing bonus mandated by state law, the developer could increase the unit count to 170 rau.:tiple family units - again with no control over unit size. The impact of 170 multiple bedroom rental units on this site in terms of requirements for services and most particu- larly traffic impacts would fair exceed those that would be generated by the Palm Court project. Table 1 below illustrates how much more intense an ordi- nary rental project would be on this site in terms of bedroom:;, cars, people and vehicle trips. TABLE 1. DENSITY V5. INTENSITY Multiple Bedroom Palm Court Rental _ Difference j ` # Unit:; 205 (192) + convalescent 170 35 (22) # Bedrooms 235 (219) " 425 2 190 (206) # Resident Cars 123 (115) 3 510 4 387 (395) # Employee Cars 40 5 5 35 Total Cars 163 (155) 515 352 (360) # Vehicle Trips/Day 285 (277) 6 :3,070 7 2,785 (2,79S) # Residents 326 (311) 8 510 9 184 (199) (Note: #s in parentheses = project as approved by Planninj Commission) 1 48 (46) Studio, 127 (119) 1 B.R. , 30 (27) i B.R. y 2 50% 2 B.R. , 50%, 3 B.R. 3 .6/D.U. 4 2.5/2 B.R. , 3.5/3 B.R. 5 50 Employees at maximum shift 6 1.6/Employee (all shifts) , .5/Non-Nursing Rc ident 7 2/Employee, 6/Resident Car 8 205 Units x 1.15 4 60 Nursing + 30 Assisted Living 9 2.5/2 B.R. , 3.5/3 B.R. 50w04e072485-3 -1- I • i ' Palm Court has already been reduced from 279 dwell•- ing units to 205 dwelling units. Any further reduction in unit count will negatively impact the economics of the development without any significant benefits to the community. 2. PARKING - There is no clear consensus in the City of Huntington Beach regarding an appropriate harking standard for this type of housing. Staff has recently become concerned about the adequacy of the ,6 spaces per unit standard applied to senior p;roje.:ts based on experience at several recently completed projects in the City. However, these prcjects are of an entirely different type than is proposed at Palm Court. They do not provide meal service, they do not provide van and limousine service, and they are located in more isolated parts of the city. Palm Court by contrast will provide van and limousine service to its resi- dents for shopping, medical and other trips; it provides meals and is in a location conducive to pedestrian activity. The Palm Court project, a congregate care develop- ment, has vastly different parking requirements than Wycliff Towers or Emerald Cove. A survey of seven similar congregate facilities in California. documents that the actual resident parking requirement is at a ratio of less than .4 cars for each apartment unit (see Table 2) . As is indicated in Table 3, the. Palm Court project, designed to meet the Huntington Beach senior suffix parking standard of .6 spaces per unit and other city parking code requirements for nursing and commercial uses, will provide a large margin of visitor parking. While the developers are absolutely confident that the parking requirements of all of the project'3 components can be met on site, they have agreed to accept the condition suggested by City staff that the City inspect the project•'s ` actual parking needs on a periodic basis, and if there is a documented deficiency, the developers will agree to partici- pate in a City Parking Authority off-site parking structure. 3. DESIGN - The Location of the Palm Court pro;c= places it at a critical seam between downtc m and the medium density residential neighborhood to the east. In districts. In response, the project designer has developed a building which has two distinct and different facades. The western J face of the building is quite formal and conforms rigorously to the City's downtown design standards. It represents a landmark quality building that will demark the edge of the newly emerging downtown Main Pier development. The eastern facade on the other hand is at least a full story lower than the rest of the building and is designed in a much less formal, multi-family configuration. Views toward the ocean from many adjacent Alabama Street properties are not inter- rupted since the commercial portion of the project is only one story high rather than the three stories permitted by code. Moreover, at no point is the building closer than 40' q� 50w04e072385 ..2- QI to the property line of residential neighbors, and much of the building is more than 80' distant from the residences on Alabama Street. The code required rear yard separation is only 10 feet. Appropriate CUP conditions which mandate careful design, Mediterranean appearance, full articulation, and ample landscaping will make Palm Court a good neighbor that does credit both to downtown and to its residential neighbors. i I 1 i I i- a 4a I 1 4 i + 1 r 50w04e072385 -3- I I 1 1 MN •"k r'Tiri"j ltxt �'+�li �'�M. i f, .r i iPF�k.,�t• i �}',�,�+�',� � �'i' Y+�� ,t•?..�y�.h >.,y.'.•..ti��'�L!..�1't,h'.t1!.',..d�•I.I`.wt��•l t� v�6:: w x .�� !� d. c•' 1'rfr.:, , jr. t'r', ,•w J ,(r'"�L. X' u1k ' y,, p i w� i+ 5 115 t 1!,.,c a.; r JJ Iw .I:.x; .4, 1 1 'I�. �.,. h. �,.n }Y','+.'i I.Y >.,"t '8 "1'. •t• .�'L'" t a I c,�'.�,°ip��fyyy�,y;�df5lq.l�•R '�^� }, ,t1!•. 1 .;i tfi,'.� 1.'w 5. i ,r-�t t r 1' n5'"}+.J' ,+, n� 'Y ,'•i� ti'I'( Y1'�,s.�,: •('.'I i4'S �.3•�n oSl�,w w,is A.I. ,,. ik w. l, /•,�ti,. :di �. •{ [' .� d .' ;' ;�• ., i�.F`'''"j r"1�� �.1� P i .eyi' •.3wy, •,.�+k.V' '•. ..,d,''• df�'i�. �4'•J''"�•( (..t �.i:.�J. J" ,J�V ;.� i,`1•., "1 ,Ya. .s1 .� 5• Y ,1�1" L+,+ s• � pp �7' �1 V'.:'i�('I{� � f',. 1 ss�.i !� 7 •F.•.,1' w" 1.;^ � 1 },.� ,'I. , ,'i. • �1e, '14�{�� k 'Y� �T� .�, � I',` ,�.I J� qq +I `M, � kl ,1.}�+'.1�,,'E„!•,{.��' /. :, 4 %,,'S.��{: 1!•t'y� " >,'i.t,' 6'. r �, :J I.' 'rL' '�w I 1� � �f J. I S 4 t� 1'°Y�,�1 e,�wla .�.' �4+ •L..J�I,�y I C. e' r ,Y i;'. 'l 4, '� .� J��f• .v '( �`'.Jr�'` '1�' �' '��1�••f 1•�• i"p'Y :r�}•+,��,L',1�.'iiy'kv`,ww�,n, ��'+ ,It •9a+''r+Itr,d{ti I' .i +�'1.•: �: )!I J� } � !r`�^',�:i ��.�' ,' tA��'� �� 1 � .1 d ' sy� �';a� ' ., �)ir tl;N t• w '. n,' h ' 's .f ; ` { !I. �'+ I1• t.s� ' 1 + t�4(L Y . :w-l.. ,._. — .1_..�..«i.....w...�..i.r.�.I. ...«. .........1..:.t/...._.�..........a..-.� I...,..........,J.�...,...w...w.......,..�..1:........—.._..�..�............_«. ...,_..�w•a.........x..�.i.'�'..�: �„� it TAELE 2 . CALIFORNIA CONCREGATE CARE PROJECTS ¢ No, of Car-to No. of Resident Apartment Pr2j-qct City Apartments _ Cars .__ Ratio Ocean House Santa Monica 121 7 .057 Sierra Pasadena 216 49 . '126 Bonita Villa Del Escondido 34 24 .285 Rey Villa Del Napa 81 31 .384 Rey Villa Del Merced 94 32 .340 Rey Villa Del Visalia 100 27 .270 Rey Villa Laguna 350 90 .388 ' Valencia Hills j 1 Sanport Huntington 148 ? .340 j Beach (not yet built) If Palm Court Huntington 205 ? .600 M Beach I I 1 i 1 1 I { i ' 50w04e072385 -i.- { cif: •tlaY ' • � '-�jo �� -t - TABLE 3. PALM COURT PARKING ANALYSIS i Actual # Requirement - Code Spaces Spaces Per So. Cal. Weekday Weekend Use = Requirement Required Provided Experience Surplus Surplus ' Independent 245 Apts. Senior .6jUnit 123 123 82 41 41 Living (.4 Unit) .. r-,,-�= - Nursing Assisted 90 Beds .3 Spaces/Bed 27 27 27 27 _- Livin- �=, ' `-� Employee Parking 50 Employees None Specified None 40 25 15 29 (weekdays) Specified Corurercial 14,500 sq. ft. 5/1,000_ sq. ft. 73 73 73 0 30 Totals -- -- 223 263 180 83 127 {^� =; Jw 50w04 f072485 a- ' �• ,(+ A. �•'�... � rr � Ii 1R5}, ,Rd .}r„ l ):•' '� y,`7 ?k rlr SR +^F) gar r ' ` � ( S ^y; �,+. t�("'1l .y .' 's:..'•it.".�;,�V •ns.v.'L;i0.i ;31,y��. ..:�a,�s.r. �a 1, r ,f _� �'� r �,e• 'rJV+aSra1 E J'v1i+.�. 3i ei Ski1:.:Y ''"'�.t'•�,�',''4,�,{��,•�'��'''" • "�, �.f r Yi ' �, .; .�r•.�,ktG,st.�.d :r`vj t'� i'I:.c 4' 9'.�,rr'.J� 41•.. �,lii.x�.); '�r �'^; Yi,'���'�.,1;�; � f�,Y .t,r 1' s 4 ]t'. J r ,•+ >ti+ 'u', sy a y�i`�'rh,..•r,t�:.; J l'"t'.' '• f s M.�:' k,t7,r :ry �, ,� i •�'.; a.' pe'ii. .�. # ow. 4 ,,�. �`'�:� �%}rS.,.J�� , �,�f�+.;� �,,1.r'��.^ 1'H�. .};1':{t�4,�t,,.. !�• ,�,.5��.•. `• "' '^ } •a• '� � � 1' 71�,�� `�j/ .}i' �+� °�}{t:r•}�J,�\�`;�d� •'���'t7' hsv;.�+ et, v.r, i��5..a t ,ti. .�. ni. v1'' `�r` .'k. �i,.a�v' '�.a. .F. ''� l �',•iF' ,'4,i.. �y ,t y�'J' i •l•;•n�P dl �'f'� -.ti,dv�'A!. .� ,� 1 ��,t4' " t- �'1�4c i'r', ,/ , ' k rr,, T; •]•/ " r \ r ; �'f5„ r '!'°. it 6 q Ye`�, R,�•�"F�,�: a.,•S �,ti`''~:;r�': •,:." tt.':i L';Y�. •..r, Y'' yy �•J�' r,1��1'R•;� �'� r•1 r�. �, ;r '� "'� a � ,!,.+; f+.."' j, ri 1, r +`�`4,{�J,'�,•� i4 Sr:}7'3J q `"!t. �x�• r),r•,,, :�i;' :T'� � .,,t.'�7.. -1,::F�Y. �"���'i '�'L.a....7�� v i yZ �. A `bW �d ,\ 7• �5.� y, `;' .A•} T.. �: i, •'! �.'(l `1 t �� � ` Y+.i :•;r S ..� �. E �,p., a�Jet �t.,q (��'! R' xy'�rtt'� : �' � x'l!r"i •1 ti s•,�";f.c•Y;'�'•, ,.r, 1 �.�r;., , tiL-.�.._ Y,� tt'i�' p S• '� .' ,�1,. �, 1 " y.X �rx:�'.•'y i ti�.{�i•'talS.�s�,i":��,.t't.•�Y ,'(�i'r k; `k'` 't.�^ ri::•',�:.�..'.•,',�,..,:.'sl:+ � ��yJ.,r 1 G "r ' Y �. y 1 ��lr.y 1 4::v.'•,•"- � v r tip,• r 1S �.: R .. > y�•• R• tiraYJ 1lSJ+► 1,'y ��:(� "'�' Y' xt�'�',l��r:,��. ;!'•�'.'; k ,,.�y•, ham,.(; ';�, :.k"N�h � n ATTACHMENT 6 od 1 T4 �,./, s M t`ty�.• ,',+ y.ia '1, i .��}v�,' •���;•f''�' .,�'` T"��+}, 'r '�,t r �,'�!� 1 dy9?;:,R{ ,�. 'v 4 �",� �+�,ty ���. �, �!yS. �;i R. C^. ''.�>iJ:•}J+�E.e.S. rr 1:+�'i4 � t, ,Yt''�•.. .i,`i`'wI :y,:di`�7'M`:4 �,7s. t."...5.•t ,`r:}Yt:t i. ,1 t4; 'w''•��` .(� �! dF1�?. �• ,, t � .� . .•,�y .L r•. .�, v,. �.r 1. y t.r . �1 t. ;. �;'+' , ,;y, •,A„ J ,.�• 1'a'��, �.. . ,' r4�. •�r.�,rj.r.�.t•• t y{'p..L� -,,,1,r a,,...,�'�r'y 1 ��1 .4 "';f; t, �';$ir �1� 't..,' >' ;a., gtf,�) � i�,g, � is J.�a Ly4' .�. ' ,4� ..��s •7,iI}t'.'I�-,,r..f '•� Y..'r'��r 11�e4.{„l t'f!� 7..r�I�y {.,... ..;1.4 1 y7iy; r�t���,'��,'+ '� �':1'':i.� �' �} �t t ��{ �.;J'' ry �.,,�`y '4.;y{r�, i',� � ,w�r�,f'n'{ti r i.i+ v ., � ;.1�•�,.fv`. � � iX'r•u 1,r�.�,'� } p't}"'' t 1 '. ;�•: �k }'1a1'} :l ;'�, •1` r r�r• �r1�r .F va� t.. i 1�I.i4� Jtifl.w6.:�a'.',C!'��wt�.'�w. �SI'f�..c...=—•' - -a.."1�:.� •�ii4.LLi1i ��S:cw+.r.1.i. .:�L'iSi '" '�...t•a r•r�i," �• 1„ �'.�."a�.�.�: i r � � A Y j,6"y� f 1 CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION • • • • TO City Council Members FROM Rutn`S. Bailey, Attention: City Cleric . Mayor SUBJECT APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DATE duly 11, 1905 APPROVAI, OF CUP 85-24, TENTATIVE TRACT 12268, CE NO. 85-27, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 85-7/NEGATIVE ' DECLARATION NO. 84•'34 j Please accept ihis memorandum as ah appeal to the Planning; Commisson s approval of � CUP 85-24, Tentative Tract No. 1226.8, Conditional Esccept!on No. 85-27, Coastal Development Permit No. 85 T, and Negative Declaration No. 84-34, (BWC/Vanderwood's Palm Court Project located within the Town Square subarea of the Main-Pler Redevelopmegt Project Area), for the following reasons: A. Development is hot consistent with the objectives o' the Downtown SpecMe Plan ,and the IZe.levelopment Plan ' Including, but not limited to: parking density I bulk �! height circulation 8. The applicant has not demonstrated that there will be an ecomomic benefit to the :"nwntown through the Oavelopment of this project. �. RSB:Ip EXHIBIT N0. 6 t 1 C.-A ,9264S I A I I 7r" 7- C iiM, � t, t•,N y �� a ',v ,� 7 r r r � �, `� �.�. � 'f, f �{:a'r.:'�� '• .1 V�'r 'fl�';i.+ ;yti�,+k, ci 'i ;A., �'. `�k,:};1', v t� i�;7���+u+r,�i��a.?t.' .ti n�,:;�i��. s'.�`{:.,'f.,�+ ?►S� rs..i:'l .N,{,y' r.1. '�hyr' •�', ,� �• I!sy {�,yt ,,�1 t�: ,rx. e, ,x, •yynty '{�,;.; 1,,4� ' .t H,'6i.'•r.' t'�,ffh; ''r:� y,1 r}{ ,, jr,yr++4 +rl'le�'�� '.sir,.�y. ,fit ...,t. s _ f�;, t. i `�'i..Y• ! •/ yy '1J s (, 4, /'f?'. •y �C�, 4,.r• 1,t 1 1� V�(�e •'J atii .r ,•,'� ,} I,W �'rc ,i,}<q�•.tyv, 4' •r r`r4 g' ? r•r; s t 'hC ti,PI .�I�t'a y 1sYy! ��t�5�; �y;5. Nj 5, $ �'� ,.�•, , 1! 1 '[L f..• ! 4 �1:1� 64�t�yy �',� r� ��«' �� ■•I' �1': � �,'..,C'�l} �r y,'�•�t• .Y f',; �1'�� � ,.�:4 'xY' t. �' i/ i+'�•. •ytt.;.ly''. ,'S a r ft 'll' {ry 57' s�k�y,Q d. F" fr+\�'� S.`6irr{ . a �t ;•i!•7{,; ' 1 ,A. ,�, �,iF S:,j7{,3¢t n1' u9S� 4 ,}, '.l w•� ^� 'tFi,� .1 4 T Y f�{+s; lyf•.1 r" .41� f` 7� +' 'Lai�aC.lL ii.��L::,...d��77'.{'�� p t 6'a t`• t 1 4S V. t• 'r .:.:aLa.:.11J;si'' P41t•,� P r s:' :1 �' �� ri "{• ,'f�'.t st `��'•�a t�, 1'� �+..�..Slv.L �l„�J�'a,� url,.tt' ATTACHMENT 7 i li A� • 'Al r �w r 4 � ;' l'}.r�+ n�'' ;} '�' �a�?��k.,' '�'i'1�.',�'a• •rt f,�'. � ,a '(LQ�•,� r / T .�F"��'R): � "� ".��..''�'}ii:,y r•�,��y�d�'�! � r 3 ��•,�.T•. �,•T4. •.al;• :�! .�t•.�{aR'k� .�,� �'� �,; ,� '14 � '��'",51:1�i t{�(� T 1�.;, VAS. y, T.S E�•,�,;.t,• Sl' �r� ��i•S d ',:k r�.• ,���r .�'• i �r 'h.l• �,• �ti '�;:r .�t.+l,'t.a .J 'i q7�, z r s7 �+� ( � � ��a` f '� ��•S 1 p i:.5..�,�' ) �` �'.' 'i n� �;;�"�s' �•. .a +: �1r'� ,'�h � w �aP ��� � '��'f�:�i., r ,, ti d,`; 5� Y, .. •, �?��j,^t��� T 1 }T a� f r / y ('� {7vit'Y r`��;�;Y:A !' •ni l � 'a (\ 1�i .�5.•,k.�� "'Al � � �� 1 ,W'Wii°fin ,.�•. 11?f' k .1�'�' � va.'.•tryr'�Y 1� '•.�et:;•,i r.a� .,T 9 iM.,.;; �, �'',,'+'••`.� r':{{ �,�+.. }, �, �.� 4r ..(�..r�.� � '�' a,' •ti � .X�y�, ( � ..t•lir�.� r l,yr r, J 1 � � {, � ti 7•.��' �r'. i.y, •�r��4 .1 fia.r•.•J 'I�.. i '�1.�5+�. ,�. �u��.a(,••.q.�ji ,�.� � •1� Ord ��P � 'j1t .r4 ,. 4�ClV,A ��y p; . �Y.",:. ,� �('.'"•1,' � � '� "T�•�.r..y):�',�����5;;�!$� °�1 r�;t� l �,. 1��R� ��•M��di�'?ri,�wi i!y.ii•1'i�: ''��}y..Sa �•a. �1 T� �. �•t�; �,�;�h + � R� !''Ss' .r.a.ltl:�i�C .!!� " � ` ��.� �'�,•. . 1.�::�.'-y' 1't1�•''�• �•h �S;��,��i •r°, ' ��'';'9„� ,IY:�'+tit`) a 41 �� r•• 1S'�ll.i:r:i.r�;'' /.. a lf'TC:..O. - :s.:ya•4'Ji i l '+��• r.r, w k y� » x�'t ' L4,:']�..'_ s+L .u�:.F..S. �LuI' y �. BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC P.1PP.ODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO AG"E" AND CONDITION OF ORIGINAL I DOCUMENTS or I OF" or, I t• i 1 .t I • }�. 1'�;ri rr{!51 r r ,�• •771{•'k 5i• 5'L' �'r`7?�11ro�'t�{�•;i,,��`.�1,�';�lY:� .§'p'� `.� t�ry'�' '�!"%, ,A.5,1 f��..'; ',#,Y.`�•.yY a• ,y5 �j'�!'•4 4�•"'1s't,�J{,t.• i5 � + 4•: ��,t•,'•,.�'�' •ip'i��(M1'�1.�!'S�.i.e�¢5:,r.{,+,1�1.��'j lF/",�.;15..� ?ItyW�, •'d1f/�t',:� ;�,� �,,} ,•Yc3,1"y 'iv li,�:i. •tS;�,1JA�"1/+q +i�, '1', � .,ti �wi Yl. "' dt'�1 .1 ' •�^ � � ,�i�! .Ai'."1°*�i�i I�vr�•�4;y! V N1'V�SiI 1 14 S'.lltt�Jt ����f�4�1�r,1�{ ,I r�� 'I+Y�,�y�lr7r,I'(�,;�Y � 4��",11 M..`,iY 6iS� 1;�„, �:�''� �J'5.,�� `r # {5+. ,�' .: :� ,.i Hss11 �� .t,+� I i .l •(SR'�• .�,� 1 i. ",C,Tr. .•t�'rr ,t Sea: .a,µrrt t� r '�� �{ ,�,, h' •.� r 'yii :i5 5 i �i!t• , lr , V i+ i1tiC�1'• 'li'. �`•.til.. 'Ml, i F !��! �•,yrL r ! 1� i4f! 3 r, ,�'- fy. 4. � i ClY, l��I p f,�,� �• �, 9 � }'� �hc17•" '•�vl (�y 7� :11� d �i'i� �•,�:r,t'. ni 5 i,^••"♦'.�`,�,.i ,y;..r �ji;l � :r'1 i 4,.,i f' S '4' I :! 3'J�` y�' '\•.�' ,,, y� . �. , �y eq� 1�4i !!�(y yp',]���'p• f�'`4 v.•�31('(( .� } Y, t,' d' F.j�'g'!I, r� �Xyl. f 1't ,t I. .r ��: a �• "5i'r' 1*.?��5 �• kl ��t .�.,h,1'4 �J!.yr•4.� [fI :'F!'S1.P.^f'.�':r�t�':��.* t✓.l. �1,}��}1' il••, fAi yd St'•.. �F<' .ly.la� ',�•1.'.i`�" .!rl•�51r, •il�,�.F!} f ryt tl x Y•,; 'T u+ /.. "�. a !t..5!• l� 1. +y; ,4,!);•'�,� y:.. 'V �.r.5.•ti !.l 1�,. !'..,.•� •r i%'ie�' ,� •.�',i ,,`;,C.'�' k>.�'�"'.' "y' �Sh,1l .5,7:� ,ri ;fps .. �� y.y ���\•'J�.JI '7,�1,1,��6�.4:�,,•"; ;'e r,.J �, !� '�;.,:','• �� ''r i � �.,•I,h ,1�y 7h:a 5, y .`; �: `.. �r "{ 4� (+4�s�.J.li � �' + , r.d,� ,,..,,. 'iC3ti_lt.......�.Li,LJL.'=s{:,itdi'.�•_.1a�'1..+.� '.t�.�t`'� .'L:.,r:..�fL�.. , �..}..a1'iX:�:•,.i...i:• �'t�r..,.,�y3.',;�� y Y'J(lfJr; i�1,.�.vi,i�'MI � Y5i�4i .f11r_��f:raY'iy.,Jsg J(al y 1 1 , 19g5 , Huntington Beach City Council Huntington Beach, Califcrnia 4;ti�8 j Lear Council r' Members; 1 We wish to appeal the deal si on or the �'1 anni ng Commi s;i an on July _ 1985, to tappro,/e Conditional U_e Permit No. 65 24, Tentative � Tract No. lwtccn, Conditional E-!ception No. 65 -??, Coastal �,avelCpment F-'.:'rmit •,,5 -;, .and Neg�,Fiv" Declar:,tion No. 9d—'-i. i OLW appeal i = based on the following problams: 1 ) A 41% density bonus over the specific plan for Old Town. i 2) jnadpquat= parking facilities for residents, i emplf_,yees, and vi =itors, imp:,cting negatively on the Old 'Town community. � .� Height variances which negatively a; Fect adjacent property values. I We have the approval of the following residents of our community to include their names a5 corlcUrr i ng and supporting this appeal: Mr. 'c Mrs. R. Conrad Mr. •'-- Mr=. D. Goode Mr. Mrs. T. Jacobs Mr. 'f Mrs. J. Pratto E}il1TT3IT N0, 7 Sincerely, t:'enneth and h1ar', S'o_•a Skol'/an 1C1 Hl�+bla Streetmtra,=r .- Huntington Beach. CA 92•S4'8 , f lJ� Enc. Chec�!: in amount off �155. . .i0 1 Cc; Planning Commission- Mr. t;v'1r- °< Mrs. R. Conrad Ci7l"CCUI Mr. ?f Mr i. V. Goode . ''�� Cr Mr. Mrs. T. J-acob= 1 Mr. '< M-_. J. Fratto Mr. '- Mrs. J. 51 oven O.T.H.A. Fit- �- . Y I i' ,I r �" •�Vey �� << �i d.':7��ti ri ,f�(�•' � ,�, � �� �3,• l � 'e j••', h •J"'• ��,•, ' �'t .,.�' I'n, ,p .j � 1 �: d• '� r '��,�}.�,>.ky'' 1 6�"Yi b w� �' .i• re!+.,;'�"Ft ' '1:"y4�� ��.•a s�,y'F• '4 .���5'',, 4 C �t�4III� '.�• j, �'uyc Ayl:F�i, h� .$''•.',,�� �." • �. •� „ ,+ ��fit:> �' ..,�. t Pjn- , r, �'� .�.: '� .,'� �'Y:: '•�•!;;•S ;�y, ��',•r.'.t. y,��j_„��"y^ �b e , .. 'Ci , �, �' .','.Y•.° tkd� FA .•r; �.,.yy::'� aS �. �•�'�;`+.1'• K `q {�tt� , �:'IS% 'r1y �r� l` ,„}q �•�.. 4`•}S'k'..s�� �1• �';,,�4,.�:< ,� r� ���'7 ,"�, ?� F1'4 � k.h1! �>+' Sv+ 1,��`1p1n7''4.; i' •.�;'�� �: 1.r. T" �:� � Wk�.f;1 �, 9���.}', �i' J�r '� � � �'.� ' ''�t' � ,�,t','v;•;v'I �;+�';i'.1`�p ` sy""*' gtP N'Y'ii ;{,.•z'i�`:�'�'� �'7� ��Y''jr�..ry,.1�,;wh, �y„ +F�j' !�'1 r It��?r,�:.e.4a.�1.`r�i� V� ��? ��' ���A;G}.��'S'' ',•al�,�� �.y�Y�, '�„`t '„'f�,�'..,ter:, ���y,.�n1�'�p,t�('� ��'��''� .,y',•f re r,,�.� 1 ;j{,�y;r.�: �,r�;S�SkI�'L�':.i1FIL'.Sw•r�'�i:wF3.:' .1 �;�,'f�� '�ij��f' r'�"'44{�."t: hjl' ��y��.+��,, �A.' .'�!"•. ;��i•.�.S.�i':�Li.3i.It�hrk�a�ui..S6+�w.4 't �f O I' Y. i I i ATTACHMENT S I i I I I I I t I f f tX4 1, a' at Yr• } � •��� ���•�t. �.�.�', r n' A�,��� �'��' ,�.; 1 f ��y4• + 45���n ."�'k:Y}'i• F �Y. •4'k�r'�� i>,?'.', •rsh.. e` 4' ,+ ,*,all ;��,� :a 'nt1 1 .6�•k: :`F !1d•b ti'�. ,r ,�5 V�,�k., Z)) a 1 •, , ,' /f t ,� �, t '��'L•1 V!•' ,� '�.1 I! � � �: I',:s j:4. � . }5 f• fn � � l.;.t •4.1•:{ �,v��,i'a kk�'" V}11:..,11'tl Aa{ ,rFlx I;'l n;i• �, f 4 , ',.} } 5 f, r 7 4. s 1�f+ ir', �'yr A:.y? r.,J aY i 1 •, aAM.ti 5 a`p`�.,,. ! n a• F yi "A I S1;NIOR PALL! COURT PROPOSAL PARKING ( . 6 SPACES 2U5 SENIOR APARTMENT STANDARD PER UNIT) i 30 Room Convalescent (60 bed) (2 spaces per 3 bear) 10 10 30 Assisted Roams (30 beds) 10 ?0 48 Studio 72 29 127 1-Bedroom 191 77 30 2-Bedroom 60 18 353 154 } 14,000 Sq.Ft. RETAIL/OFFICE 73 PLAVNING COMMISSION APPROVED PROJECT 192 DU UNIT = 41% DENSITY BONUS 30 Convalescent Units (30 Beds) 10 10 30 Assisted Units (30 Beds) 10 t0 46 Studio 69 28 119 1-Bedroom 179 71 27 2-Bedrooms 54 17 TN 14,500 Sq.Ft. RETAIL/OF'F'ICE 73 182 DU UNITS = 34% DENSITY BONUS 30 Convalescent Units (30 Beds) 10 10 30 Assisted Units (30 Beds) 10 10 46 ,Studio 69 27.6 III 1-nedroome 167 66.6 25 2--Bedrooms 50 15 306 105.0 I 14,500 Sq.Ft. RETAIL/OFFICE 73 i -nnIBITwNO. (2958d) b l �` Y �iq5 t tY''Yr5't'., �, y� .y•�r�ri+1'S Y' '. S�"' i•tF.C., ! f ^� �i.r 6 {•; 1 � 1''Y,r �^, r �' !� t.'; rt1,• \kFp. t° rr; r r• n � t t �"i'' Ul;ti r� � r r.,,•.•,` y 1 ,� Z A'.. •(+A• Sj� (,'., 4Y Y , " 'y. �, ,pl,i,a" .�,�' 4g � �N ?� r.:y;wt 1' •�Y+,'•ti j[ �^. x .' ',t"�'G'• .., dY� i'�' •rhF.i•4'.���y�r Vu2' � ,1'• '� i e` " ,,r, .y °g1i','�'i,� kt`6.1j!'. •.•t"r r P'•xa q y" � �,, 44r'7 t �,.'��tF.Y.r ,�xr•:.I�i L Ihry' •t11��'r .�' i�:�idq(,���,', v�,� �• ' :'Y,"• "4't' �SL t- , ,, ,{/ �'�•i t'ii .t- ••��t .c{�y�y" 1,y1�1.•}-'f � ."5:.� ,� y j; 'S.•; ,r ,t'di '�, � 'fr ` [ ,•�' i ,, 4 •.WI Yt}i'' :\Y.'rr. 'q4y�h: 'S. i ,U'(.:A .��.;'�.,.�' f .,"Sl'i♦ i't• �• n1+' 1 `�S,y.1., � •�5 �',�''')1y� '"l v,^r.�'Ak.I�` J��F�Y•'i:,r, ��/r•.41t,•; `_'��. ,�,• ;ti�y ;y,� q �''a t„; �1!,,. ¢r' �, .w /.5 �.1Y •,.,• L1 .i t 'I. !�`,1r�i,r t .;�l, ,• t �' S ,.., .rj t ,' t l� 'l r. /';1.5 'S.� t � '��", •,�,�4t�Y��'''..'k����;�r• b,. � 'yt,'�:r ,�',y���r.+• •,�'15�.F},• y.;ra.\4'y.:`5 1 ;r• r`•'. 1•. .'�•F.Y%G+� + ti�.�,f,Ytt'�'.'1i r7i 1��4('f".".�; � f'1 1 M1�'' ''t i.} Si yyy��,U' � r �r� �'" �+ f 5,. i'j y, ) �,;�","���i: ay..,+t�.�+�•�-�i.�i r1.s�,t"it:r'yti 1''q ''1�. y�t,� i' �..•:'r>.. • +tt1',�.itii.:. ,Vy'�� !r' ht � K �i ,4t• 7" ,Y°�;.f, at � Yr.�� k r t, r Y �c.s..�.� .1....:u::w.r,::ur�r:.Lt:!�..Y..:+.1' I , .!2r1":s.l .�"�:vL.r.+ktl.�i.+kr+:i....- ':fi:.x..[i►.i.,il�.—t%t I rrf.1, • I DEVF-L0PMENT STANDARDS PALM COURT SENIOR ISSUES OLDTOWN DOWNTOWN TOTAL PROPOSAL .. ' STANDARD of area 87% 13% 100% V Gross acres 5.76 . 86 6. 62 Net acres 4 .28 . 64 4 .92 Minimum Parcel Size (sq. ft. ) 2,500 10,000 10,000 6. 62 ac::es 10,000 Max Density. 115 2 istrict 1 136 205 base d with 51% " ' •'•density+bonus - densit-y w/low mod bonus income Max intensity (F.A.R. ) (sq. ftr. ) 279,654 72,135 351 , 789 213,855 None Max Building Height 30 ' 4 story 30 ' 45-501 * base district Max Site Coverage 50% None 50% 57. 0%* base district 07,157 + 10% Setbacks Front 15 ' 15 , 15 ' 15 , base district side Rear 10 , 3 ' 10 ' 40' Upper Story None 25 ' w/2nd 25+ * None story offset 10 ' Recreation 40% of 3,255 77 ,829 --- 60 - 1• bdrm. Space net: site 120 - 2 bdrm. (sq. ft. ) 74,574 for rental projects * Indicates Conditional Exception is needed. Staf'• Report - 6/4/85 -5- (2579d) n M1,} • «�� i is �.�P' p ��[ s fp}�sr71ir7���'/"'� � r s {' rip � s �, ("��' n,�•Q- � '�` �, ,r� 7 r {�a ti,�,Y .r' � j•e'�`•i' �,,� ,�JA�1;�r ' yw'� "�•? ,r1,.. :� i 1. 4�.11 r+•,�'',. ,4t'�� �+�r�' �•' '� '+ Ilt � �,'A µ, A V� •p1 .� ,. .1;•,!'. +�,�^•r,•'; ` 1,��' !11 •'��'i�'�r+.� t,� •r � Z: ;y' '�V .�� r•-{ L-S r M1w' wY 1. � , 4, �•�iF\; •"4��,i�'V�'.; ��►i•,.':• •:,�r��� �*� .AS :��*�, e• ��' ,�'. r�.t, ����:��' ,�' /4R'•`� �' � ti.74'> ��e��r� F '�+'�. . 'lr ,. F. ,+ ke C• t' y,f V'1• "' S r ,Ly +i�' ��, 6 r':. 1 Y 4 d .a• l �}�r�, Y,'�'Pr. �� .r u '� .1, `�„�•,t 1�.� +, w• 1�r �} y,[ 'r , 'S•' Y +r r 1:, t ra. t r, a.«i r,• ,�;n '�. ,� ;Vt.�r:°�C� � ,��;�'i� , �1:. ,rMPO;!�;.,. ,.rJ�'i f+ I'' ,}�{ (;'�. f. ' ,�r. .�.�{ ; '1. 1., r yam,. •�. , 'ti •t•y: �'��'� I .F'C*; a' 9��;'. p; `M••� {�. •d � �: ,u n•• V'•i' t r ' � .:,f }t''�'''p �.. �,.s�°' ,y'. r•. ,t t� ,�t4 ��rra�,' k �!`4" �, '1�C r ti o'�' �1•6• ; �,' .1 y�•1}.,{� �A'• F t•:!"e tsr,y.� •�� ..�,1 1 fin'�r may, :i .]' r'r t,•�e♦ 5� ��n} i n, � �,ty i' ,� •.,@ t ., 4 "�;!L ye•,�l!.T".. i y� ! ,�y,`,;(���3.,4'y.4' t .A•� � '�R" , j4r•'lti p'1 .•'RT,��' N�'��, F'y,V .<vtS�' F"��..i��Kn t: 4' �tr.S. 1 4��iy,�,•... f,.�'t;��, •} e .1, '� � S,L T. , dy�,,F y•�'+'�•�+r. �. 'i.:F;t:i�t��;7.Y4.1.4 ri �•,, ��� •�•A� '� � Y.:.•.7'1,r.M eV�1, IIVy w1. ,,J '� T 4 n , r.\',,`(���.�7 G/..,.��,4s3..;J;.,• o r,FY '���. �•t ,� , r.r!:'i ���''P�t'1 ,.,r <��.irs 7. t �, �r e ,�•, �1'. „•n , �y, f i�-., 4,• •4' r J{;: YF �: t',' f t ,p''�'lp �•, `)"�v '!�f'�•,' � s.;�,i 'f}{.a�.w. F �" '•p r e..�Ys.'ra; ( r,.' ,.V:J�-. �jr. Y1`�1}� �n.,�'h a�'•1','�'eif�l�r } ale„ :�{' .� 1,y� 1 'i• y^1�� 9 ,n, 1x1 .�w...+.:i'a4�•L.t}.'lllu�.�1�.� 1SY..�. ,ls�. _)__e 'y�••`.' 1:i1..l�:as.n.�:,sr}:ed'S��.ya.�}..s.s.:a w'...1U'.7".,r l.,r�`�! ,h ;�s° .t4;.�ix'�'h'�'�:ii�L':..:�.ti'�..__�l.:t''!:,.>_'l?i�is.ii';i�:3S�=��"� �;.:.�:fw.:...,:.:• _.. • I • j DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (Ccntinued ) � DENSITY ASSUMING 136 UNITS PERMITTED = 23.9 UNITS/ACRES (115 DU/OLDTOWN + 21 DU/D047NTOFJN) , 205 DU APT = 36 UNITS/ACRE 51% DENSITY BONUS .235 DU APT = 41 . 3 UNITS/ACRE ( includes 30 75% DENSITY BONUS convale� ent care units) 265 DU APT = 46. 5 UNITS/ACRE (.includes 30 95% DENSITY BONUS , convalescent rare units _ I and 30 assisted care • � units ) PALM COURT SENIOR (� PARKING OLDTOWN DOWNTOWN TOTAL PROPOSAL STANDARD Retail 14, 500 sq. ft. 73 73 None Office 2,400 Eq. ft• 8 12 None e � Residential 87€ 13% Studio (48 ) ( 40 ) 60 ( 8 ) 20 80 1 bd (127) (107 )161 (20•) 50 211 !� 2 bd ( 30) ( 26 ) 39 ( 4 ) 10 '19 units units Employees (25 25 250* , 421 • i i * Indicates Conditional Exception is needed. •Yr j Staff Report -- 6/4/85 -6- (2579d ) _ :t. - - -- J;ki �' ,, { L�; y !t t�� '''; rt i.} ,f. 'y� �tM1gg''�. �! ;i�1 ��'i4 dr.°, `4 �`,,, '�• N', � g p t z., `� 'J '� k,r n •..�'4{,,.n,i°a'fb),.,`•4�h. '1A' •�''' R}•T'''4 �',.,k 5• 1 �,','"+., T� 'i i �• n'y �'}5} 4 •°� r, L ,i7Y ."f t r ,\�' ',,� iy.. d e.�Jt;�� a ,�..Y�x. �� . ,.��A Y' i!1 t�� x ''1 •r �'..!" "^�.t;.. SIT,w9 i1y ;1 i. .i�1,•tR,l'Y'''+,r 4 ,1. �t"''� r1.• �l.' ,, 9:'. f �, k `r 1� kL �• R a(•' n,.� �. °; �;. F. n. y' 174 7 I, .r..L; �.• �,} t:t 'l, >,. :Sr :dl:t ��y �:.', { ,.1;°�L,:''-.dTx;�''+F 1t1 �t. 4 ti 'h R','. '., Ayy a ALL Y r Jt} !•' r�,' r.,�}:: 11 t'"C'd' 1 xx T'1'�,�' .',' !W '7.y'�.�.."'�y, 1 1 y�, � !f f ',`! ;fN i,qIRt 1 N � n t. 47 '� � ''." 1 t,A,a•„ i.�' � '�':�'15„t .� J;' 1. 4,1� �. ,7�..}w A. �� f f,• ` 1 } r �',' •'s `�',i ah� f;tt'. ' �"fS''. 'h tyr.•. ,:"..', x•,.•:•i't• a j y.r, U !' Y••,ys',s,{ i 1 f'•t'a i.,:::.:t.:�'+1::.f> i�ta::R<�.1�,. •�L.::1'::1ai,.R,,, .r,:yrt ,:im...:�....�:►:.:,::..�:�,.:,J.:r':i�,,.'�..:�R •'s'�.:.".:.r�a1�1 rc'. r�,ur'.'.+��i�t.�� ! Pub.Lish - July 25, 1985 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 'PALM COURT PROJECT" APPCALS PILED TO PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL i OF f TT 12268/CDP 85-24/CE 85-27/ND 84-34/COASTAL DEV. PERMIT E5-7 i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearitLg will be held by the City Council of the City or Huntington beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.H. , or as soon thereafter an possible on Tuesday the 6th day of August, 1985, for the purpose of considering in appeal to the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract No. 12268, Conditional Use Permit No. 85-24, COLLdJtional Exception No. 85-27, Coastal Development Permit No. 85-7 and Negative Declaration 84-34 (Palm Court). Negative Declaration 84-34 assesses the environmental impact of said project. The applicant's reruest is for a one-lot subdivision for the purpose of constructing 205 senior apartment units in conjunction with 30 convalescent units and 30 assisted care units (total of 90 beds) along with 14,500 sq. ft. of office/retail area. The Planning Commission approved a project with 192 units and a 60 bed convalescent - assisted care facility with 60 beds. The applicant is seeking relief from the ordinance code development standards pertaining to parking and building height. The subject site is located at the intersection of Luke Street, Atlanta Avenue and Orange Avenue. This project has been appealed by the Mayor of Huntington Beach, the applicant and concerned citizens. All interested persons are invited to ettend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal. {I Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 -- (714) 536-5227, M} Dated: July 19, 1985 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH it By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk ; f r r o • J i I y}� 1 ` � - x- ,+dt'�L '�'A ?"T'•'*s�h'ate� .yr�;�� Q[,�;r *'•�r' `�F' �,1p ,�'r „��.'�X •;aTy.�l�''a?�f���i:ti ,�� ?. a•�rrl5�;,?,.f, e yl' y' •. �Ml., � 1• .I,�e •p ��� � t.+. r`•`'�q.Y:I�Vsee� �k.�'� +' 1 ' �, �e 'i e1 e � �� �.1 1 e *'•jt�•r"••} `'( .�'• ' « 5��55 y ram, i �V 1 s y .:� .. .e ;s " s1 s s' ,.�� S' �' � �i tl � �'�� ,� 7f :�1�(,�' r t n .r���` �'1 t'�•' E � 4• S> 1' J,' Y�I+k + l I,(} }�I'r •�••` {p a ••. .• 1 �'Ie,11+'Vi ': a �'�� 7 �.�; t'•,6 �,; yl. ��k es'.�i. .l .e k .• e U I 1 t •'✓M ( .W • { ,t } P''���1�, yL''W.� .e. .� 1. A f{ R '1 1f, !, .1' .t' a .i.. ,1 �.•, .1'. }, 1. t�i+:J��efi !. .l, � 1nY � P ,�aL S ...�. t sy` ^7}s�)iv�,f•,,1 •. S.�k,.a''V''?14�.v.#fWi.J�•� ,,•, t�•e 7. 1. ::i j:La.YaS�.:�lt:i.tlt' kaa+L...si17�1]L?.:.•�u�i1.�Y7i1L11;: 7 1Wi�'IaL'�.RI..iF "��'�1YG.'ILL i..2i'�'L� LiiYt�1W�1 1. `•• 4 I '!' f • Publish . I II NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING tf l.tl^^ C0.4 ► 1 1 .—r' '.4iQ 1.SG��—� ^,IJI i1 7ti►�r,Y 7 S....,J t�}��P' ZT '22�/t� CJ�� ff•r�t� �li•d7/NDiy-J�%<�t•.t�T�� �.•r•..;i�'-7 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub is hearing wiII •b-e fi-evWb;r-the-M-y -tounc— `�li of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Cham'ier of the Civic Center, g _,� , or as soon thereafter as { Huntington Beach, at the hour of �• P.M. possible one the day of lg . A i for the purpose of considering kn 41pPej(-Q or- tile. I W11Y11�1 [•�-rnrri�SSIr1J S �I Y�rlcl.Q of 'f"W6,tbVe, -VkC ► No . ��.�.vri�l,�'' �1n• $5.2`t, �.orJT�►�1gnc� �xccp�cnl No. 6�-z-7 , cv��st� ,� S' -7 cold ectuecthoV% Cp s •n 'pp�,tclhl�"'� �GaV���T" •fr7r• ct, 1 t~n S v�Llly l S101�! F-C 2 ccg f..a✓° i/1.L01r' '��� �Ynl=lT1T' V h l�j i W GoN �vj�C��UN W 3 o c.ctV✓c��r 6t,r V h l 1L�k o /r 1�1` I CWrt° Lh%k- a (To Tlx� 06 w1 11`14 W l `•5'o e'-, r` OF p �OVC� M to Cr vJ I t"tt 1.C1-L v}\k 0M Ct G` (aT�44GCN act /(;561s�ev� CA-0, hk(-%Ll lky �J L�k 6OBd-50- TT�C 00 kLA-'N ir L dS 5ctgjN yeti& fyvm -'ke deuelopvht m-� s c.. vBj ` 5l ' �Y�t.VYtil.1 '� Ili ti•1��N Gl>M G�. `�v 1� �L .4�� �'1 L t �DG,t''I�'ja '�' •T'kG t h�V. L C70}'l D� L•�'�K� tYe•e�"'/ t�"t'�-t�v1'[�. �v'-�'t:� cvM LEI prum�e t1vej .'j'y, 5 ?tDjezr' D\ . -rigf- MCIP `'6 &,jrtt��J� All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said �yl �,� GU ti Further information may be obtained fror� t•he Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main R Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH i '�eL{k I A14e, F�� bv; Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk �•1 !' A d�'•) ir,.� ` a, {. V.,A I ,'� '..�^ � / �'��r�rti�' � ��..^i 's:�}' �' ,i4•"°" a• �c A 1 ; ;5S i}.1" 5 �4• a r: � i 5✓V r• '.'15'1 ),Y� .k 4.;' .7 : .'� 1.. i �'t A 1�•:V. f{�i}V.�; �j 110�'.a.,r� :f W''1S•..I: y�„ ri.,, 4 ! a . .n'• t ` ''>; .' +5 yfi5 � r, d , i.f'"'►�' "S 1p ,i:;A k +. ...,p, "j'1. r11d 1I�„l�fy/••44fY}} .54,E '4i. 5';',{'�,,p, ,+ hM4,S9 f�. ;]'��''� 'n ,rI'rt,'�• ;>�1 t,�a4t h' ^f +�,G "hVtif f. !::„�,. +'J ksl, 'k�; y..�•yt ,: ,� hl ti,..i •�, �• 4}, ► � r�if.:� � .1 �(•` �• i" 't� � 4,y`I)h�' 1 �.,•r ! „�y,1''.S' ° �.. ' a , �f,r •� �,F. r ,. � .�, :t- rtu o t !f t• . 7•.d t' , rry 4• 4 r. r, . ' t' ! k �:' f.. 1;.r•4, +;r w ,Y t 1 4 1t' y e ' f '� i►.,4? "�.„rttifa�Jt y f,.�(`'r ,,a�; "�' 1'► h p t 1 K a � •r 4 ( f 1' ^ , l I f tA51 t.1y , �, f' i1C1»l'w /1.K'` "j,�`y: �yri.�.� AA (`f%JL»+ •� i.�t.?:�1'a. 'S.�l�', irl ; ti a,li.U'� "'tL`.i �til3rra� '1:..��'.us i�..� �� IPA F� NOTICE TO CLER TO SCH DULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEt � c�`��~ . � TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: PLEASE 7nuftE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE DAY OF 198 ; P's ar attached will follow No AP's ' c Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department artment Petition i * Appeal Other f Adoption of Environmental Status (x) Has City Attorney's Office been YES NO informed of forthcoming public 1 hearin ? Refer to ( Planning Department - Extension, , , 1 for additional •information. 4 r * If appeal , please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal . 1 ti t {f t JOSEPHINE RALLY JIMMY YANEZ 3.07 JOSEPH E LEWIS JR. 117 ALABAMA 107 ALABAMA ST. 15291 SEINE CIR HUNTINGTON BCII, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 IRVINE, CA 92714 024-206-11 024-206-22 024-206-06 CITY CF HU NGTON BCI' LEO D MARCHAND MARYA J EHRLICH 200C N ST 700 5 TH ST 203 ALABAMA AVE HU NGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH,CA 92648 4-205-13 024-206-23 024-206-08 EDWARD J SLAVEN JOHN M PRATTO CHAUNCEY If KILLIAN 17517 BELSHIRE AVE. 209 ALABAMA ST 201 ALABAMA 3, ARTESIA, CA 90701 HUNTINGTON BCII, CA 92548 P.O.BOX 184 024-206-14 024-206-24 HUNTINGTON BCH ,CA 92648 024-206-09 DONALD SI.AVEN THOMAS L JACOBS RAYMOND G SUSAI4 CON RAD 17517 AELSHIRE AVE. 297 ALABAMA ST. 121 ALABAMA ST ARTESIA, CA 9070.1 HUNTINGTON BC1I, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH , CA 92648 024-206 14 024-206-25 024-20G-10 GLE.4I7 T% HOLDAWAY MELVIN R HECKMAN DENNIS R MASOOD 223 ALADA:IA ST 1029 PARK ST P.O. BOX 691 HUNTINGTON BCH , CA 9264S HUNTIDGTON BCH , CA 92648 HU•ITINGTON BCH , CA 92648 024-206-15 024-205-08 02.1 -205-01 ROBERT BERE`IS DONALD D GALITZEI1 ANGELO B MOLLICA j 45 ELECTRIC AVE 9770 JAMES RIVER CIR 409 ALABAMA ST � :TEAL BCH, CA 90740 FOUNTAIN VALLEY , CA92708 HUNTINGTON SCH,CA 92549 � 024-206-17 024-205-09 024-205-02 CECILIA RUIC HOWARD J NYLANDEIt EDNA L NIC HOLSON 111 ALABAMA ST 9631 CHEVY CHASE DR. 407 .ALABAMA ST HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCII, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648! 024-206-20 024-206-01 07.4-205-0a LOUIS A BORREN HOWARD J ►lYLANDER CHARLES F PELYF.Y P . O. BOX 1345 227 ALABA:IA ST 405 ALABAMA ST HUNTINGTON, BCH , CA92647 HUNTINTTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON B('.H, CA 92648 024-206-21 024-206-02 024-205-04 STEVEN E 3ORREN DONALD EUGENE GOODE If C STOVALL P .O. BOX 1345 219 ALABAMA AVE. 948 11 Tit ST HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BCII, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 926,10 024-206-21 024-206-04 -05 024-205-05 e 1 1 I HUNTINGTON BEACH CO P.O. BOX 7611 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 024-271-01-02-03-04 BWC/Vanderwood Co. 615 South Flower St. Suite 1201 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Kenneth Skolyan I 121 Alabama Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I 1 I I l 1 i i ' f I RITA M PALLADINO LEONARD 0 LINDBORG MARCELLI► L BERRY 400S. MARIPOSA ##24 17220 NEWHOPE ST. 409 3RD ST LOS ANGEIF.S, CA. 90020 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92646 j 024-161-01 024-162-12 024• _64-09 I FLETCHER H DART HAYWARD C JOHNSON jR. CARI4EL LING 310 2ND ST 730 14TH ST 5401 S MESAGROVE AVE. HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 926,19 KUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 WHITTIER, CA 90601 024-161-07 024-164-01 024-164-10 DOROTHY E PARNAKIAN EDWARD F BRAY DAVID C DELLANO 320 2ND ST P.O. BOX 209 b4;.2 COCId:I.Y CLUB DR. HUNTINGTON BCII, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA92648 BUENA PARK,CA 90621 024-161-11 024-164-02 024-164-11 GARY ROBERT PALLADINO GEORGE DEUNDIAN ORANGE COAST SPECIALTIES 26241 HARTOG ST. 317 2ND ST. 636 E CHAPMAN AVE. LAGUNA HILLS , CA 92653 HUNTINGTON BCH , CA 92648 ORANGE, CA 92666 024-161-12 02.1-164-03 02-1-164-15 -16 i GARY DEUNDIAN DONALD 14 PERRY VALANTINE ET PARNAKIAN 317 22ID ST 313 2ND ST. 312 CHICAGO AVE. j HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BCII; CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA S2648 0?4-161-07 025-164-04 024-144-01 i � ALFR D J PALLADINO JR. HUGH G WHITE EVERE'1T M HICKS� E 10E. HUNTINGTON DR. 309 2ND ST P.O. BOX 310 ARCADIA, CA 910Q6 HUIITINGTOII ECH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 j 024-161-14 024-164-05 024-14?-02 -03 I ELSIE M SMITH FERN T HODGE VALi;NTINE PARNAKIAN 239 LAKE ST. 305 211D ST 312 CHICAGO AVE. HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 024-162-01 024-164-06 024-144-10 HAROLD L TOMKINS DENNIS NICCOLE LECN DUBOY 231 LAKE ST. 400 3RD ST 20222 DEERVALE LN HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 IUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 024-162-02 024-164-07 024-144-11 JOHN A TEVERG JOSEPH A MF.URI 26133 HATMOR OR. 119 VIA .OLUCA CALABASAS, CA 91302 SANCLEMENTE, CA 92672 024-144-14 024-164-0a A I HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPAIV ROBERT P MANDIC B M JURhOVICH 12689 LANAKILA LN 241 ARGONNE AVE P.O. BOX 7611 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92641 LONG BCH, CA 90803 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 024-134-15 024-134-09 -10 •-11 024-170-13 -14 A NDREW LEE ORENS CHARLES SARRABERE LED D MARCHAND 512 OREGON ST 122 MAIN ST. 700 5 TH ST EL o-EGUNDO , CA 90245 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH , CA 9263E 024-134-1% -17 -18 024--134-12 024-170-08 THOMAS WICKSTROM MERLE CADE ROBERT C ESCHLAACH 20522 SALT AIR CIRCLE 215 10TH cjT. 510 ICINGS RD. HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 NE:WPORT BCH, CA 92663 024-134-19 024-134-13 024-187-08 EDDIE L OGDEN EUGENE R WEBB FIDELITY NATIONAL TRUST 1832 MAIN ST. 934 11TH ST 20615 CALLU BELLA HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 YORBA LINDA, CA 92686 024-134-20 024-134-14 024-187-09 JAMES RILF7 FOX HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY F'AYE I MC INTYRE 11783 ETON DR. P .O. BOX 7611 511 ALABAMA ST. GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 9264c, 02.4-134-01 024-173-01 024-187-12 JAMES W HC GUY EULA V HIGGINS MARIA DOCHMASCIIEWSKY 1700 MIRAMAR DR. 505 LAKE ST 7621 ALBERTA DR. NEWPORT BCH, CA 92661 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CP. 91!64 024-134-02 024-173-02 024-187-13 MERVIi D BECK ELIZADETH HEIM ROBERT M MILLAY JR. 8491 ATLANTA AVE. 16392 E HEIM AVE. 509 ALABA,MA AVE. HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92646 ORANGE, CA 92665 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 926« E 024-134-03 024-173-03 024-187-07 ROVERT F MANDIC ROBERT J KOURY ROD T E:GGLESTON 12689 LANAKILA LV P.O. BOX 65176 506 ALABAMA AVE. GARDEN GROVE, CA 92641 LOS AIIGELES,CA 90065 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 9264 : 024-134-04 -05 024-173-04 024-184-16 BRANKO CAVIC JOHN VOZENILEK PA'TRICK EDDLEMAN 410 MAIN ST 2271 PACIFIC ST 502 ALABAIIA ST. HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 9261i8 COSTA MESA, CA 92627 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92.64 024-134-06 -07 -08 024-1703-05 024-184-17 i JEANNE DELGADU RAMONA G GUINAN RAYMOND A STEINER JEAN E DELGA 9192 MAHALO DR 8855 SUTTEI. CIR 9714 M, CA 90240 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA ?2646 DOWN024-205-06 07.4-203-13 024-207 .19 ALICE G STURGEON RHETR A GILLETTE HUGFi M FgSTl;ft 212 BALTIMORE AVE. 202 ALABAMA ST 28743 TOP OF THE WORLD D� HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCE:, CA LAGUNA BCH, CA 92651 024-204-07 024-203-14 024-202-20 j I CLOYCE B LANCASTER DONALD E GOODELL ISMAEL M SANTOS 211 ARLANTA AVE APT A 16571 CHANNEL LN 416 HOLLY ST HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA LAGUNA BCH , CA G2651 024-204-08 024—•203-19 024-201—ZB I DAMES GOUIE BLOY15 3 ABRAMES DONALD L SHAW � � P.Q. 009 5022 20522 SALT .'SIR CIR 211 CHICAGO AVr. HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 9264EI 024-204-12 024-203-20 024-202-09 1 VIOLA BREEDING CHARLES R SIMPSON ALFONSO PAREDES JR I 110 ALABAMA AVE. 220 ALABAMA AVE 129 ALT.BAKA ST � ' HUNTTVGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH , CA 92649 024-204-13 024-203-09 024-201-07 I WALLACE L NELSON SARAH 0 MARTINFAU STANLEY R CHAMBERS j 106 P?LABAMA AVE 209 BALTIMORE AVE. 171? PINE ST HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUTNIGTON BCH, CA 92648 024-204-14 024-203-1.2 024-201-14 i STEVE WOLSHIN 1LAN L FORSHA BEULAH WEBSTER 201 ATLANTA AVE 1380 LAUREL 1C15 HUNTI14GTON ST HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 UPLAND, CA 91786 HUNTINGTON BHC , CA 9364E 024-204-15 024-302-10 024-201-15 FRANK f! GREEN ANGELO A MOLLICA DAVID L ALDER 4621 LOS PATOS DR. 403 ALABAMA ST 18586 MAIN ST #200 HUNTINGTON 11CH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 9264E 024-204-16 024-202-11 024-201-16 EDWARD T CONLON 227 9TH ST FRANK CAPOCCIAMA EQUITY SUPERIOR HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92640 210 DETROTT AVE. 1436 S LA CTEIIEGA BLVD. 024-204-17 HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92648 LOS ANGELES, CA 90035 024-202-16 024-201-17 a.. c « I ram. nE �1UEW *OCR 460E FESICCAT 4'*CR 4806 1u� =LrI3t�'a 112 4L.:b4MA HJNT I fC: 7C"' F C-1 CL, 92648 APT HUUTINGTCN BCH CA 92648 F.EESIDE1.7 *VCR 4806 RESIDENT **CF% 4606 i21 ALAEAMA ET 123 4LA5AMA ST HUNIING7014 B A CA 92646 HU'JTIhU' CN BCH CA 92648 :.E 5IUE1�3 **LR 4b06 nES I:Et.T **CR 4806 2:J7 AL:.EAMA AVE 209 ALA°AMA dJNTlNj TCN I:CH g2648 H'J%TINGTEN BCH IA 92b48 F%ESIDENT **CR 4806 RESIDEI%T **CR AP806 21-1/2 =,LABAFA 215 ALAbAMA AVE HJf:TI(JLTC;N BCH CA 92648 11U%'TI'iGT'CM BCH CA 92648 i,E $IGE *CR 4836 i;ESIDEhT **CR 4806 225 :.L;.BAMA 227 ALABAMA AVE i� IiJf.TifjGTCGN BCH CA 92646 H;1'�TIUGTCN BCH CA 92649 1 t 'r.ESIVENT **CR 4806 ^ESIDENI x'*Cf% 4806 203 GkfIvCE AVE 204 0;=.At4CF AVE HU':TI146TON BCH GA 92648 NU;oT11:GTCIti BCH CA 9.2648 i I . i%E5IDE1.T **CR 4806 i-E S 1 1;T w*CR 4806 316 2TP ST 310 2,NI ST hX01 ?Jv7•CN EACH i.A S2h48 HUNT INGTCN BCH CA 92b46 RE S IVE 1%7 *VCR 4806 RESIDENT **CR 4006 302 2140 S i 106 OLIVE WNTINGTON 5CH CA 92640 IIJt�TI1:GTCN BCP CA 92648 l i "CF. 4bob 1' _ :`s **CF w606 a::7 •.L .. i' � :�1�• �i'1t, bCH CA 572t4D 5a_J- CA 4-264b , �;+a 'tt? rCtCK 4H11b i 1�L'.T is : i.t•..11: is -,L=.':•L.a4 LVL 2C,46 ti r.�', l ••� e:ri C 4 920d,b F _SI �*Ch 4806 )^=';' x�CF 4PO6 HJiTit':uTC'J 8CH CA �,Z048 r+,i'.Ti '. TCt. F'r h 21E.-46 N i� AL AY:. -'I ! : L lbt.'At. 4V-- I. CH CA 52b48 ►i�J! 7 i i,.�'C•'� ECH. C 4 48 V-3XCF. 4606 t it :'vl �" l.h •TP1�J r#j:,.Tl %,, Ti% [NCH CA S2b4e ►^U:.T l l.STrt, 5Ch CA 5?448 f yl✓ ST HJ i I L,7 C. :;Cm C A 92b4 b C!, EILH C.� f � :. .; cCF; 4E ob C_ i:i '.- z xVF +80F� 21.:) 5T : 1 .:'aJ 5T J7:IN 5CH CA c2648 ,+U'.'i 'v�? C1, C+:H C S204E f 1 i -' 4:*rk 4tso0 1:;� , xC.F 480E ht;.1t.T1 ' aT!;r; bCt' CA 52046 LICH C.A r427'545 i �CK 4b06 131 I LIVF NJ'.;:'.uTL,ry r-CH CA 4264C l I.I YrtCk 41jUo 1 t SIW t1T t;k 4806 l �).►TI,t.;T1111 liCif CA +P2t.4d 101111II.L11t:t; tif"II CA +r.64H 1•z Alt►► !!I *LUCK 4ttUt) ,+U.) IIIL10 1-41Ct 4806 s:+. t) ST i2" ::.+1 C.T 11'1 t, IitIt1T I(tt.1 tilt 1i0i CA 1)2o4u tilh) ) bit,1101 liCil CA 92o4h t t.ti ll', :4 T *,;ILK 4d0b r t ;I irt.ilT —CF 4hi)I. T rv1 T tic;.s1I TO IN 11l.tl CA 'J2t,4tS IM1111t1.,101: 11C.Ii CA &s264B 1,t: I c°:I '�-QCR 4806 1 l. Sil;trtT w1cC1, 480t, -3r,-1 /2 -Ihll ST )c, t ') aT t:U'sI it.t,Tttit b1:11 CA 92b4b tft)ist t 1uTt;tt orli LA vk64ti IIoi'UT f-%-CR 4bt'1c 11 tA. : Yf: ti.Jis T I tul.:t: RLIf CA 411Co48 { ci S JOE10 *OCR 460-6 r.t 5101-N I •*CR 4806 121i ?NU 'IT 321. 31:0 ST ulT :. AvT 1: i1UFJ1 :I:t.TtJJ UCH CA 92648 H1}I4Ttt.(;T N UC11 CA 926411 4 r L tilltLrli 40,;l.k r JUb IcCSIijLN1 I-,*Ck 4bU6 `• 424 !MD ST In}tll lril:I ta1 n0i LA 92648 Ail T IIUAT 11.61 01 IJCt± C A s'264d M: S1t of.N 'f LR 4806 ►VLSI OLNI '.:S 4806 -s26 :0—o ST 311; jttG Si I III I,IIbkoI'�'4 VCH CA 92648 1aM11NGICM nC:Ii CA 9264+1 r.�S 111LI1I +*—'R 480 S I I), NT **LR 480f: !10 Ali ST s0a 5T -w T 1 110:IT I t,C,T L14 t!CFt CA 9264ts It1}r1SIr1t:ll,ti uut Cs 9264d i:E :IIIt:14T o+C.R 4dt36 I.fSI1k,11ii 44Ck 4606 11.!i ST 71 r OL IV t1,111T I NI-1 it 11t_II LA V2614d tWAI ( IINGr t1 110i CA W640 AGENDA ROUTING SLIP j INITIATING DEPARTMENT �' .• .,,.. lJ!✓� t SUBJECT AGENDA DEACLINE DATE _... � �+• o m n ttra on i MEETING DATE f( WLFGAL DEPARTMENT WITH EXHIBITS f "' Y rll?iTIATING DEPARTMENT—REVIEW/APPROVAL By:'� ,YjL V2 , ( JJ' Ordinance [ j Exhibits 1 C 1 f�q I'lesolution [ j Exhibit ! [ 1 Contract or A;resmant ( I Exhibits i i Financial Impact Statnmbrd --Unbudgeted itbms aver S1,000 [ 1 INSURANCE REQUIRED [ j BONDS FtFQUIRFU 1 RCA ! ADMINISTRATION CITY CLERK FQi1 AGENDA COMMENTS: 'a ..r..�r+.w...w — r.... - - .......may +�r....�..,..,�.... 1 P101m ; s 4 , ; i NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Pff OPOSEDSALE OF MULTI-FAMILY CONGREGATTEWE Y RDUMG PROJECT- (PALM COURT) Pursuant to the requirements of Article II of the California Health do Safety Code (SS 33431) notice is hereby given by the Redevelopment Agency of the city of Huntington Beact, (THE AGENCY) that a public hearing will be held by the Agency at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on Monday, August 5, 1985 at the City Council Chambers, 2000 Bain Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, on the proposed sale by the Agency to BWC/Vandertiaood Company, of a multi-family, congregate, elderly housing project known as Palm Court, located at the northeast corner of Atlanta Avenue and Lake Street in Huntington Beach. Such sale shall be upon the terms and subject to the conditions provided in the proposed form of the Installment Sale Agreement between BWC/Vanderwood Company and the Redevelopment Agency dated as of .Tune 1, 19I?5; copy of which is on file with the Agency Clerk and is available for inspection by any interested person(s) requesting the same to the office of the Redevelopment Agency at 2000 Bain Street, Huntington Bench, California between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. The Installment Sale Agreement is anticirated to include approximately "65 dwelling units and be in the approximate amount of$25 million. i All. interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and voice their opinions for or against said matter. r Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, i Huntington Beach, California 92648 - (714) 536-5227. Dated: j CITY OF HLNTINCTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY By: Alicia %I. Wentworth ' Clerk 1011h Publish July 18 and 25, 1985, {1 I NOTICE OF PUBLIC: HEARING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY- CITY OF HUNT-MG HUNT-MGTO BEAU4H PROPOSED INSTALMENT A F MULTRFAIRILY CONGREGATE EL17F.:RLY HOUSIN R ECT- (PALM MUM NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach (the "Agency) that a publics hearing will be held by the Agency at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on 1Ionday, August 5, 1985, at the Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, on the proposed Installment sale by Agency to BWC/Vurderti•,00d Company of a multi-family congregate elderly housing project known as Palm Ccurt (more fully described in the installment Sale agreement hereinafter referred to) located at the northeast corner of Atlanta Avenue and Lake Street, in the city of Huntington Beach. Such Installment sale shall be upon the terms and subject to the conditions provided in the proposed tore of installment sale agreement by and between BWC/Vanderwood Company and Agency, dated as of June 1, 1985, a copy of which Is on file with the Clerk of the Agency and is available for inspection by any Interested person requesting the same to the office of the Agency at 2000 ".1ain Street, Huntington Beach, California 92G48, between the hours of r• a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. The Installment SL .;reement is anticipated to include 265 living units and be in an amount of$25,000,000. All interested persons are Invited to attend said hearing and express their opirlons for or agalmot said matter. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk 2000 Main Street Y Y � ► Huntington Beach, California 62646 - (714) 536-5227. I Dated: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ' REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ! By: Alicia M. Wentworth Ji Clerk I 1012h TEFRA Hearing- Publish July 18, 1985 REQUEST FC" REDEVELOPMENT �aENCY ACTION ' Rif 85-29 ON 'r 7� eo June 21 f�S l , 1985 2?1 &A.4.0 6 Date Submitted to: tionotable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive officer 0,'W� Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopmen Subject: PWC/VANDI RWOOD - PALM COURT PROJECT 1 Consistent with Councii Policy? Yes [ ) New Policy cr Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: r� I STATEMENT OF TSSUE: The Redevelopment Agency, at its meting of June 17, 1985, voted to continue I the 'TEFRA heating until the July 1, 1985 meeting. This continuance was to allow the Planning Commission, at its Tune 18th meeting, to conduct a public hearing on the proposed project', entitlement. If approved, tee Agency Mould then be in a position to conduct the TEFRA hearing on July 1, 1985. The Planning Commission, at its June 18th meeting, voted to continue the entitle- mant hearing until July 2nd, after a lengthy discussion by the Coran;ssioners and input by the public. 11F:COMME117AT I0y: Based on the above information, staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency table the scheduled TEFRA hearing and direct staff to re-advertise at the Agency's meeting of August 5, 1985. This will give the Planning Commission, the project's developer, and staff ample time to have an approved project for the rescheduled TZFRA hearing. CI%V/DLB/CPS:lp I I !i I PIg111B5 s I I REQUEST FCr-" REDEVELOPMENT )`�ENCY ACTION 1111 85-26 Date .juu 13, r. DEFERRED Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency mbe s BY COUNCIL /COtINCIL. Submitted by: Charles 1V. Thomrson, Chief Executive Offi er TO. ... =44, Prepared by: Douglas N. Ira Belle, Deputy City Administratori Redevel pment Sub"srt: 1 APPROVAL OF FINANCING DOCUMENTS-- BWC/VANDERVIO D AV4' 1+ 1 "/"4"d COMPANY (PALM COURT PROJECT) Consistent with Council Policy? D< Yes [ ) New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISRSUE: Staff Is continuing to viork with the B1VC/Vanderwood company on the p,eparation of Certificates of Participation financing for its Palm Court Project. Since the t developer's original purchase agreement with the major landowner, S.P. Railroad, was scheduled to expire duri.;g the first week of .tune, staff was working to expedite the development process by conducting the required TEFRA hearing before the Isnd purchase option expired. The TITRA hearing was originally advertised and scheduled for the City Council meeting of June 3, 1995. However, at the June 3rd meeting, staff recommended that they hearing be eontlar-3d to June 17, 1985, because the project's developer was i nego0ating an extension on their land purchase take down date and outstanding land use ( Issues were yet to he resolved. C i The developer has now informed staff that they were suece:;sful In obtaining an h extension to the purchase date, allowing for a more logicnl sequene" of events to tnke place in the project's entitlement process, currently scheduled before the Planning Commission at their meeting of June 18, 1905. RECOMMENDATION: Uas�id on the above inforrnntion, staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency table the scheduled TURA hearing and direct staff to re-advertise, as appropriate, following completion of the proposed project's entitlement process. CIVT/DI,B/CPS:lp 0870 Fco�+ios I At:ttrtrirtd to Publish Advertisements of all kinds inct6ding public nurieas by Decree of the Superior Court of orange County, Ce6lornia, Number A-6244, dated 29 Seotember• 1961. and A•2,1031,dstod t t June, t9B3. r STATE OF CALIFORNIA f { County of Orange pvb ►aUu.A&W?"co..w p 1 e►�e, �.. �' 0 n . w.m 10 pt1 corrsn M,tln / I am n Citizen of the United Slates and a resident of i the County aforesaid; I Pm over the age of eightoen [ years, and not a party to or Inten;sted in the below entitled matter. I am a principal cleric of the Orange Coast DA;LY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS-PZS, a newspaper of general circulation, 1 printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange. State of California, and that a i Notice of pvhl t n tipari ncr PULILIC NOTICE Pl>nLlC NOTICE !'IJgM MOTU NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING REDEVELOIsMii Ny AGENCY-- j of which copy attached hereto Is a truo and complete 10i77 OF HUNTINGTON rWACH t copy, was printed and published In the Costa Mesa. PROPOSED SALE OF Newport Beach, Huntington Beach Fountain Valle MULTIFAMILY CONGREGATE ELDERLY Y• HOUSING PROJECT--(PALM COURT) Irvine, the South Coast communities and La uric Pursuant to the requirements of Article 11 o1 the Callfornie Health&Sal � 17 Codu(S8 33431)notice to tWeby plvbn by the R#"Vol Beach issues of said newspaper for _2 hie fOf Nurtington Hatch(Tf,E AQEHCY)that a pub11C hs t M(X1dfiy.J It lt,t br, o� consecutive weeks to wit the Issue(s) of Council Chambers,2000 M�inpSllinel,"imtlr1titon seac t,C* �IRfpiJ4A, on the proposed sale by t"A nay to 8wd,"Jsnd"'%W l r multifamily congropate, etdf.-y housin Y.of s ` located al the northeast comer of Atla�tjro}act known as pWm Cowl, tt liuytington Beach, Such sale aha'.1 be venue and t.Aks chat M i condllbns pprovided In ilia �'� the terms And Iwb�t to flip ; f May 1 6 , 198 5 trotwnen 84YC/Yan Rr°�'j w form Of the IrlataotnW11 SP4,Air derwood comptny end tt+e RedeveFop►r►ent Apet+roy dated t ` as of June 1. 1965; COPY of whO is on toe reith the gwicy CAwk cod to May 23 rvallobla for IntipectlOn by any interested paacvt(ra)rau 198 5 tht aft:ce of the Raclevefopment Agency at 2 ►,Minzf Strastlrtp sNeet, fHur+r Rory II t3gith,C•.71ii(Ofnia between the hours of 8:00 A.M.end 5.03 P.M., Mo"WAy through Friday, *.-eluding horidays. The ►nstMment BAIA Agteorwt.is antiCipeted to Include &WO111m4lely 265 dwvlfing units and be M the 198_.,._• rPproxlmate wroatv)f of$25 mtlllon. All Interested persons are invited to attend A aalr3 flraring end voile their pinions tar or against hrtld Metter. 199 Further Information maY bo abtainad from the Orfico of the Olt y,Cletk.20M Main 8trett,Huntington peach,California 02048—.(714)'.,36-5^27• l Oated:51 13r85 . iI el1Y of 141)NTlNGTON SIVACH WDEVILOPMENT AQNWCY Alfcia M.wenlwodh Publishvd Orange Coa„pally PI'ot CrMayrle,23. 19C5 i declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing Is true and correct. Executed on May 23 , at Costa �'sa, California. Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION Authorued to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public notices by Oecroe of the Superior Court of Orange County. California. Number A-6214, dated 29 September. 1991, and A-24831,doled 11 June, 1963. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange tr :f%dtvA�„�� own wm r0 V4•a Gdwnti+�� I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen i years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal cleric of the Orange ' Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is coint)inod the NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, Ip� WKNOT ICE• . . ?.J'NOTE printed and published in the City of Costa MOSS, t+___ E OF peusuG MlAs .. .,._.....,- County of Orange. State at California. EDEVELOPMENT AGENCY alifornia and that a — C11Y OF HUNTINGTON MACH Notice of 'Pub I i r•_ t4Q a P ROPOBED INSTALL.MM SALE 1W MULT14AMILY CONGREGATE FLCWRLY HOUSIHO PF40JECT--(Is1p m Cam) NONCE IS HERE©Y GIVEN by this Ityala vsla;xrgM ApanCy of the C4ty of of which copy attached h "Agency) hereto is a true and comple s Htntington swh(the that a pubflo harming*M be bw by the ' Agency M the hrtur of 7:30 P.M.on Monday,June J, M186,at the CaunCM. copy, was printed and published in the Costa Me.,.a, Clwmbfrs,'.000 Main Strait, Huntlnpton Beach.California SMS,on urn ; proposed►nstaronont ante by Agency to BA'C/Vandtr* od CAxrq t of a Newport Leach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Vallbt, multi-famurt w tns no lml housing ttxgor�eleaknna �i:wr; i Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna located at the no,lhwal comer of Atlanta Avenue and Lake t3b*d,in the city Beach Issues of said newspaper fcr 1 time of Huntington Peach. Such Installment sale siraif be upon the terms and aub}ecl to fie t ordttkxna pruvidad In the proPCaad tam of inaUlt"a rl His, acre %*' t by a7d bateeen SWCIVanderwood Company end Agency,dated c Wn.v 111Its to wit the Issue(6) of as o1 June 1.1955.a copy of)which Is on Me VMh the Clark of the Agerp:y lied !s avallable for Inspection by any Interested person requesting it ie*am to the othm of the Agency at Man$treat.Huntirgion mwi,Cself9e ` 92640,between the hours of 6:00 A.M.mud 5.•00 p.m.,MWdW!hr Friday. 5 SNOWing hoUays.The Instolirneni awe aaw�rae owd Is anildpated kxWd�s May 16 198 26S livrknp units and be in an amount of us.o00,000. All Into este+d persons we Invited to ktitr it Bald helft arid eupesee their. opinions for air against said matter. , 198 Mon G rovi t N��bona be abtatned Ir am trrr Ot,'icel 01 the C111y Ciyrk,ZpW1 ' DATED:1. unl N sees,Calilomia.9264d--(114)535.8227, Wry Of NUNY TON MAC" � 19 t3 fl6ORVE6OPWRr Ae1►fitfiCY BY:ANcla V.Voinlw rlN i 9hitk � 19E3 Fu!)i%hod Orange U&M DpRy Pilot Wly 16, 1905 Y 7h•i?9,! 1f,8 I declare, +jnder penalty of perjury, that the foregoing _3 true and correct. Executed on May 16 , 198 5 at Costa l4 es>a, California. , Slgnnture >��, PROOF QP PUBLICATION C17'y OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COUNCIL . ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION t1l%iM;1Cwi MACH To Iionorable Mayor and From Charles W. 71homp� City Council Members City Administrator Subject CONTINUANCE OF TEFRA NEARING Date May 31, 1985 p PALM COURT f I The Redevelopment Agency staff has been continuing to meet with representatives of EWC/Vanderwood Company, sponsors of the propo.;ed Palm Court Project. While progress is being made regarding the project and a possible Disposition and Development Agreement, staff would recommend that the TEFRA hearing scheduled for June 3, 1985 be continued. Since the TEFRA hearing, required by the Tax Code, has been advertised I would suggest that the hearing be opened, any persons present and wishing to speak he heard, and the hearing coni,:..nd open to the next regular adjourned meeting of June 17, 1985. CWT/SVKssar I i i �I j I 0907h r -� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • REDE' ',OPMENT AGENCY = C11.1f 01' HWU_'%0)!1 BEACH • �� i'ROPOSEU SALE w �.. On MULTI-FAMILY CONGREGATE ELDERLYROUSING _'ROJECT - (PA7.li COURT) Pursuint to the requirements of Article II of the California Health b 4� Safety Code (SS 33431) notice is hereby given by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach (THE AGENCY) that a public hearing will i be held by the Agency at the hour of 7:30 P.H. on Monday, June 3, 1985 at i the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, on the proposed sale by the Agency to BBC/Vanderwood Company, of a multi-family, congregate, elderly housing project known as Palm Courr, located at the northeast corner. of Atlanta Avenue and Lake Street in Huntington Beach. Such sale shall be upon the terms and subject to the conditions provided in the proposed fora of the Installment Sale Agreement between BWC/Vanderwood Company and the Redevelopment Agency dated as of June 1, 1985; cagy of which is on file with the Agency Clerk and is available for inspection by any interested person(s) requesting the some to the office of the Redevelopment Agency at 2000 Hain Street, Huntington Beach, California between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.H., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. The Installment Sale Agreement is anticipated to include approximately 265 dwelling units and be in the approximate amount of $25 million. All interested persona are Invited to attend said hearing and voice their opinions for or against maid Matter. I . I Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 20DO Main Street, Huntington Beach, Californis 92646 - (714) 536-5227. Dated: 5/13/85 CITY OF UUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY By: Alicia M. Wentworth 4. Y r' I • REnEVEL_ OrE p Ina the Redevelopment Agency of the city of „dice is hereby given by will be held by Huntington Beach (THE AGENCY) that a public hearing the Agency at the hour 00 7:30 Moir, Street Monday,Huntington Ben h,at the City c"Ouncil Chambers, 2f100 c; cS + Agency to BW C/Vanderwood 92548, on the proposed sale by tote,elderly housing project known Company of a multi-familg, c angreB 5ueh-corn sale shall hp upon as Palm Cnurt, locot�:d at tB`aenrtheast corner of Atlanta Avenue and Lake Street in Huntington the ter 3.And sub eet t the t between BW C/Vanderwood Company of the, Dstsllmen ]e Agency dated as of June 1, 1985; copy ofti tan e e ] pment Ag Y ble for inspection y Y and the enc Clerk and is avails is on file with the Ag y l Interested personts) requesting the same to the office of the r1 Redevelopment Agency at 2000 Main and Street, P-M.,Huntington da ea .4hr,a�� California between the hours of e 0 Iestallrr nt•Oga1eM•Agreem in the Friday, excluding holidays. anticipated to include apprmillion�ly 2b5 dwelling units and be approxim"et�e;amount of v25 PtlSlisttcdz-_`...tytiey'i6,-and'�r:y-�9;•1911b-�-.. AlictapMt n Evort 7City I 1 1 , a , , CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Whitt City Attorney ,1 REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES C k ry City ClerkPin stntcr Goldenrod 0401rtmental IMM01MON KAQ4 Date RrguW m6do By _ dVOLn"Wnt 1•.ay 14, 1935 , sfephen V. Kohler 11cusing & Conrunity Deyelop::lLof INSTRUCTIONS:File request in the City Attorm,,% office as soon as possible. Print or type facts nece:wry for City Attorney.Out- lino briefly r.asons for the request.Attach all information and exhibits pertinent to the subject. Type of legal Sast:ice Requested: ( ] Ordinance [ j Inturarta ( 1 Other 1 I!J Rnsalution ( ] Bonds f ] Contract/Agreement ( 1 Opinion All exhibits must be attached,or this request will be returned to you. 1' ( 1 Exhibits Attached 'Attached is a draft copy of aW authorizing• resolution for the ,financing documents t being prepared for the ©WC Vanderwood pi�ject (Palm Court) as prepared by bond counsel firm of Bro?f►, Vood, Ivey, Mitchell and Petty. Adoption of this rasoltltion will authorize the issuance of th& tax exempt securities for this prDject and execution by the appropriate offieer►s of the city and Redevelopment Agency. These documents-will be the subject of a public hearing 1<iafor-c the Agency on June 3, 1985 and as always, I appreciate ,your cooperation and assist�,ncl: in reviewing this document in sufficient tire to accomitodate the Agency agenda deadline noted below. N, SVK:sar . Attachment h If for Caurcil Aztion, If not for Ccuntil action.dedrod carnFlalten data Signature.' l►p:�w' deodilna IiaY l.� 9t3 i � f Jurw 3 19C n ., council M"tinp ..,r.± L I ff l+lU 12170 w+. ,i ■ �.x Publish - July 25, 1985 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HE ING "PA?�i COII$T F80JECT" j dF'P'E4LS FITjM Tb PI.!lERG COMffSSION ArnoVAL TT 12268/COI' g5-Lg/CE 85-27/ND�84-34/Coks1'AL DEV: PEMT 85-7 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach; in the Council Chamber of the Civic ;.enter; Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7: 30 Possible on Tuesday the 6th day of August, 1985,Mforothes uron thereafter as considering an n P pose of appeal to the Planning Commission's approval Of Tentative Tract No. 12268, Conditional Use Permit No. 85-24, Conditional Exception No.Declaration 85 Coastal Development Permit No. 85-•7 and Negative n 84-•34 p Court S (palm -27, Negative Declaration 94-34 assesses the environmental impact of said Project. The applicant's request is for A one-lot• subdivision for the purpose oi' constructing 205 senior apartment units in conjunctio units and 30 assisted care units a wit t h 30 convalescent Of office/retail area. The planningCommiesOonedB) along with 14,500 sq. ft. units and a 60 bed convalescent -- sted approved a project with l92 car applicant is seeking relief from the$ordinanceecodeideve with 60 beds. The � ' Pertaining to parka with standards � Parking and building Intersection of hake Street, Atlanta Avenue and Orange site is located at the lies been appealed b the Mayor of Huntington Beach ntheAa plic This Project Y y g , concerned citizens. ' applicant and All interested persons are invited to attend sold hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal. , Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk 2000 Hain Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 _ ' Dated • July 19, 1985 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BY: Alicia M. Wentworth i CitY Clerk � r � t 1 :l," City of Huntington Beach office of the City Clerk I'll, P.Legal Notice Huntington Beach,CA 92643 Lh I Zi r; BCH, CA 'q �1!!�• i 1 h i�' d 1• MOM— ,h , {ai 1 i 1 �' 1 r n�.'� *, �tr �`�. T y, �t}k 11•, h t I r� '' � h �Y(y t (,' J�r-.. � � 1 {�� 1` �{ • �•: < , :I �,r � / �4! •,� J � M1� 1'• � V F J.1 * � ` ��;.'+ t`'.�u!• � Vr• tr R.1-' (1 +'. �. � 1.K,• .� Fy � 1 ,�� w +� ! 1 fin 7Y`4. r.: r �{�+, � j �k'� a ik} ��y•.�'7 .�.. 1 � �F 4 , 5,.�; N! ih 1• 5 , ,y' pi. , rh, ''1 1 'nA a` `, ! a,l+ ,�� A ',. h+Yy ya `•.+ rf �� �� ,�;. 7 + � °� 1 r.S >` .,..1 � i� }, « J j. r � +� '• � I1� ;��� �y ,fir t ,.� h i ..r , 1 r � y f I.f �T �' �": + r r>` t, Y� j1 iy ' { 1 �,'r � h� , fl. � ' �e .,� y yi• ` � ,v ;y ,t � � .1'.{ } ��•� .4' { Z1'�'1 '• -� ,w. r;� f � l Y*7 rl / y �;�� �,;• 1 4 h y A4. 'i Yk. � '.�-. ti. ��y�" s �:����T� "i 4 ��,' �� � �i� :^ vr� a• I �, ,risir 4 +°;+�' '. k{ y � - I {+, ' �{ � � y r t � �y� 4 !.+ *1•' i�, � �! Pr r r� 1 . yti e S } �, r, •'1 ;y + 1 i (y 1Y '�4� r� � � l � +r. ,t ''r...t� +r ( yt � �,r 1 '�,ti > > a x� �,•j Irw�iyCw'?.. +.r ;� y'4 Yr M v MI•, �. �Jy i:r �r �;. }, +� � I f,. �' ray r .+ �4 Ar �°r �I r. � ,� +i �� 1 y*�: { 4 { S{ �'.+`.,•� � ,i i �' ti,l.,�t��f. S�J 'ti •1��` �n � '} •Y � a' r � r SSS1,. y �d k�'4hl'k�.•t�Y>•;A!�`�r� .tVl1i.�'". ,'' y��n ,.aL,i�'.{ �Z sti 'i`tiLy1�' / 7,.:� �,A��.�A.. 1: '.J, ,1 r ,i� �r{ .,. 4��_ .TS ,M Publish - July 259 1985 NOTICE OF PUBLIC AEAYING "PAIR COURT PROJECT" APPZALS FILED TO PLANMG COMMISSION A.-vPROVAL OF 1T 12268/CUP 85-24/CE 85-27/I4D 84-34/COASTAL DEV. PERKIT 85--7 i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P♦P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible on Tuesday the 6th day of August, 1985, for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract No. 12268, Conditional Use Permit No. 85-24, Conditional Exception No. 85-27, Coastal Development Permit No. 85-7 and Negative Ueclaration 84-34 (Palm Court). Negative Declaration 84-34 assesses the environmental impact of said project. The applicant's request is for u one-lot subdivision for the purpose of constructing 205 senior apartment units in conjunction with 30 convalescent units and 30 assisted care units (total of 90 bedn) along with 14,500 sq. f t. of office/retail area. The Planning Commission approved a project with 192 I units and a 60 bed convalescent - assisted care facility with 60 beds. The applicant is seeking relief from the ordinance code development standards pertaining to parking and building height. The subject site is located at the intersection of Lake Street, Atlanta Avenue and Orange Avenue. This project has been appealed by tt:e Mayor of Huntington Beach, the applicant and concerned citizens. All interested paTsons are invited co attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal. _ Further Information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Iuntington Beach, California 92648 - (714) 536-5227. Dated: July 19, 1985 CITY OF 11UNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Cleric P.0.Box 190 '- Huntingten Reach,CA 92643 +JY /2110A MP CFi, CA 92646 �a e FIRST AS MAIL Hl,NfTINGTOW eucrr I � w r � i I r« 'S 1 , ,tc; •;1 i•1i + s. �1 ,..� ��'1.:F"•}�-i�yy�,y�".-�+�'�y t'i,t(,ir�,"�`#'r�`4.t'' �i��'t�'�t'?.s'�'Egt�irX'.�"R L'}�/4nM 7'. ��"•�'�+Wx f"7 i',/ .�v�r , � �el5i r. kF1 y�r1��}j •"iSt 'x7• �•'! 6a ;: 6 .til tr ..4g�d4. . d <y,.i,1, +• ! t, t�afy +. p11: �n `y:+� W r• •r"'1+"� r,S' ' p 7 j. r 5 r ,sY,; [ h 'r �(•1v Y �''�a r' i }i ::��,.'l f. � i'� '.5'' sl.,1,t. ,j'q �7,�y.. Tf'�T q'd' •1. x,., g�,�X7..{��„' �r,�i w•"� r r�- L i�, " �,. �'''',�"F''�i;''�"t ,.1 !1. rr t'. �!^. 1 ,F' .# ih,Sr„ F; ,}. �:�"�yfi• �!.' '4;� ,Y!,,�,5rr,,'Y! '�°l,� '�;•Y,t. 1, n h����' �i •4'�' �, dlr;"',i'.t•`.�' �.. 'r'S A• t �' � '} `�. i. 1•:'i��•Y,�", ,'eA �1, " 1� C+ 1 4 y`Ct .�� .� � � .+, .�':,, �• , 1 :¢.+• :1i �'�1 �'r.r• i ,rl' „4 t �;� ,,, 1 ' js ,�6sa?'I, r*��gr'r'4WJ',t ',.: '�'i. {g t'r1 L,t. a� .,0;ic y{1, r ..+i ', is•i�•.!t ��• '••T, "r : '� ��1.R,17`', r 1:.1 ,rat re-1 M�4 S��;S�,r,''S„ ','.wi.1 1 � .hib!' a .Lry 1j 1,. r N`I•T'' ',1 'A'"1.''5,,. '1 r. ,i�„ 1�•(,. � '�p.�u'9r IY Y: 'R �., trt.;;• ,v'� s- J, .6'' ,s1 !1 'rV � ,�',. �,1ti��..,,. .1�i':le.�, ��•1'hrlwl '��' 1 y.•r _ ryti, �. n. �.° 1"� �•.7 � �l �i wr.. �� ��.N.y,}'„�r"1. �4 .Xd�4`,is��',J,i 4.,i�,a `+.•(• '•� ,�•y :t=�r,15"E r,, ,t.�y,tr? 2�' `��'• e9.� e,•,1Y �' � ,,� t. t�.,�';t r, r^ •,a { l•�,t�.o°�' 1#,.;1 Y".+ ,�.' �"°'1*r�1i,� i� 41�•..,� °?:;,e, f�l ��r•., ';fir ;;; q,.. �•4'ea, ,I �) '1 *, 1, 1 a 1 5 t i','4! '�yk a4;�1 Yfi' '•R Y'' 1 11,7 f Il y,+ . ,?�, ��.4 .Y..� t1'a�, 1.. :'�,711 1 ,t: ;�' a 1 Ia ,14 �r'!'� ,�'.� }, +• V. t ,1��� "4, �S �y f 7'�r� ,"Il,,n t'�>, i.S :'Y •�°{,�',� �4,1'i,�.' ;}'!::d• ':F.'u S44�•''t• :,y+, 1 i.7+.'" , M1�4,'r �• �t ��:.+� ,•,j l: ..r.., '. .,}' !7!n, y I.� •.0+' ,,, �.rt,tt": , .v. ,. t. r 1 11 1 R.,•:''1 f1J 5 ,,r �r• ,1. 1. N•�. .+„ e.>{�� ,t }'�:r �tt, y, 1t s, .;� !��la R• ,�, ' ..i:. t, .1� t ,. .dih,.� .t {' } t�S�� �1���� 1 1� d L qi•�} !!'':r' "l,' � r�t.'i.''�y'e •� +.• •.P 1 y � � ��'f�'' aa s'< �1 y/{1' 'Fr,1 ,1� � �t�' � i�V"� 'r: �,!�r�, �, rr" � d•i:��'.� � { 'F,.. '�'� 4�1 ,�' Ihi"" �1��'C.t: ,7. ti e e f �1.� •�,,., '1 � t h..l �' ''R,� '✓�k` r.! .11• ,�� .,1 ` �. �a ..� r. .�. } " / �R..�.1,• �,�'�y ;a,. i`1 ti. i r•J Y � �'' , 1!, �,t$5 ,°r..t•Ya „a ,54a. .r,.,,t.-#r3� .,s ,n..+ ihr •ir'.r,r,,.• ,�$"pf '•+.•' 1 t'+7..,,;i �i ,.r`i,nYT:;9' ,I,I r�{ ..t�L' ~s,`,� �y.p .`��r1 •' .,1`e ,rc ¢iy,.: ,�1• i. .+1.s,,� „t,., �.T '�1r„•.5 C,y F� ��t:aN ,�' ��{r "+'r ;T•iJ� '411'14��.A .�Q :.1,i�4 ^1.sa,,: re:.: +i •d1� ,'�` !!�•ra .�, *A, t1 i;'lr,; ,�3'•i" ,7°"T.^.�.. 'l' y'` :•s. ,4i•51;1 �r, m•,' y ,rl �'�}' ,�, �! , y, �+�, r, �I•� yy ;� ,' :.. + ..., ,. r rd"i7e`'�`Tr�S:''4. 4C9Fis h.{4 ', ,1 •I.N'.Ri.bif4 v�5'�'d1411� :.5idiAt' .ti.?,.`ti,. i:•..k7i'.i3:ll'Si