Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Use Permit 70-43 - Signal Landmark, Inc. - Construction of a
f 1 . r Aff"davit of P40ation State of California Pr Jt v rs ss C: 7' � Counw'a. O else •� S' t:h ,• . i., City of Huntington Beach George rarquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is _ citizyp of th^ United States, over the age of twenty-one years. �?? That he v the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beac �'��...,.. Newn, a i•eel:I,' newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- �`""'---- r said c •• lIshed in Hartin ton Beach California and circulated In the 1 • 1elsewhereand ublished for the dissemination County of Orange exec p of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide Published Huntington Beach News Nc . subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been 26. 1970. established, printed and published in the State of California, and NOTICE OVIRU t1:IC MitARING for at )east one year next before the publication APPEAL - USE PaRmir to. 7c.43 County of On,nge, p NOTICE I5 HEREBY-GIVEN that a puts. of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not i lic .hearing will bs•held 'by the City devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any Council of the City of Huntington siech, particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or in the Council- Chamber..vf the'.CiVIC Centex, Huntingtnn Sikh, bt lire hour of any number thereof. 7:30 P.14- or •s soon therealubr as possi. The Huntington Beach News was adjudicated a lvbal newspaper ble.on Monday, the 7th'day,gf Decbmber; of general circulation by Judie G. lC Scovel In the Superior Court 1470; for the purpose_,01_c6nsideiind, an appeef to the granting by the.Citp plan of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. ning`Co+tirrifaalop.be...4W, .IV10.go 43, tu,s1laW'lhe�coaatr+tiW';art46i That the Appeal - Use Permit No 70-41 unl pariit� t ir+�e�1devc •ttCn app;. fi0.3 sar rti RI s_rn�a 7'l� 1 i�rdoe+c� t�i�4Thho -,u '.f;41ac�Lad ta,iw�eri:,in- land. wx+uei pad{�ieiv- ��end M OEi# .wit.., ae. of which the annexed is a print. . -opy, was published in said news- � scr �`�tife inthis'piannln3.tle;; A '.���•• .s. err,. one issue t;s�+t rra�: a,. paper at least atteic_. ;tireri d%eaprerai; thcfr opinio$t"�'"t+pt;:o� ,:ap{ritar:;to LP, .rFqeb( cs26 th November obtalp'id from th 1�tiArt 1Myi-CO •of the Cat/ commencing from the day of DATED: Niritrritler la 70 and ending on the 26 th day of No v e r b.e r diTY of MUNi ,, GTe14 66CH 9y: Paul C. Jonets City Clerk 19 70 , both days inclusive, and as often during said period and timers of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the regular and entire issue of said newspaper proper, and not in a supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following dates, to-wit: November 26, 1270 Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 th day of Nov ember 19__Z0 W . :'t = ir% 1 r •'_ Notary Pub11c Orange County, California M4 j 17, - ' C RECEIVE6 CITY C4ERK HUHTtNGTAN BEACH.CALIFA ,,overaber lr, 1970 1970 NOY 20 ph 4 Honorable Donald Shinlf;'t- rand ?:embers of the Cif;;* CotTrcil Ma-1t•:.nr,ton 3each, Califo--ria Gentlemn: Wc, : �e un'.ersir;ncd, tfi.sji to at„-ea1 :he de(:�_s?aI7 ti, I by h Planing Cor ,Iissiorl Or H.,e Gi ty c%1L Ijurctli:,47,-bon 'BuicY on 1.7, 1.97 i., f,r.':.rls i ncr Use t'evr.di t on the i7rOiu`l -hat he der sity ro sho- it 7Cl riot be ryI-c oasd 7.7 un-1-ts, ?.`Cr n cre Lo 10.3 'onits por %cre and regnesLl !:f?mv_S'f' before i:::e C-t"r Covncia_ of is `=. -til_ ,--'-Ion ae2c . : s rec?ui ed 7_ 1h•t:�cle �'�Lf Lzse Parlu'�s, S.r"1-2. l;e9r�C�f;fl '_;; yDLL'r'S, �r�'2;G�`U.� ., , �� � tip• y� -,�Lv�/j,t• eft G` y ell, Op j,V:,t_it'L;:-r r?• �'" '+•;i F. i .r P] Huntington Beach Planning Co'Mm"ISsion P.O. BdX 190 GALIFORN IA 92648 December 7 , 1970 T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: USE PERMIT NO. 70-43 - APPEAL ATTN: Doyle Miller, City Administrator Paul Jones, City Clerk Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a rcport regarding the Planning Com- mission' s decision to approve Use Permit No. 70-43. The Planning Commission ' s action was appealed by Edward E. Cook, et al. representing 18 property owners in the adjacent area. ARplicant: Signal-Landmark, Inc. 1538 N. Century Blvd . Santa Ana, Calif. Location: Northeast corner of Atlanta Ave. t and Newland St. ;'resent Zone : RI Single Family Residence Master Planned : Low Density Residential U. P. Request : To allow the construction of a 1404 unit planned residential development on approximately 140 acres of land . Reasons g ven_ by the a licant : ( In Brief) THis development will offer privacy and re- creational facilities superior to the usual R1 development. Planning Commission Action: Approved upon the ollowing conditions : 1. The Tentative Tract Map received November 5, 1970, the schematic or the overall plan for the use permit submitted on October 16, 1970, and the specific plan for phase 1 received November 3 , 1970, shall be the approved layout. Approval of the overall schematic of the use permit is general in nature and a specific plan for each phase shall be submitted for final review by the Planning Commission prior toafJ.na1 map being submitted to the City Council for acceptance. r r 20 The uesti'otn 'of' wheEher ' o' not :the 'pro- posed . 10' acre, elementsiv.. school, site; the 15 -acre �jr. high` a. hoo] site, and the 3 acre park site wii;l be required; shall be resolved prior to .'a . final' map being recorded on' pha!*A 2 or Building permits issued for ate; 1.onstruc�tion within phase 2. in ti�� event a school site and.' park site are required, a re- .e vised ovrall plan shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval . 3. The conditions, covenants and restric- tions shall, contain a provision that will require the entire 133.3 acres of residential property to remain as an adult community in perpetuity restrict- ing the age to 45. The City shall be a party to such CC&R' s. The wording o; such provisions shall be approved by the Planning Department and City Attorney' s office. 4. Fire alarm boxes: shall be provided at each of the guard houses , The gates located at each of the guard houses shall be rpen on a 24 hour basis. 5. No speed bumps shall he -nstalled on the Train surest . 6. Eacr phase shall stand on its own with regard to all requirements of the Hunting- ton Beach Ordinance Code. 7 . Detailed plans of the recreacioii area shall be submitted to the Planning %0om- mission for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits on the first prase. 8. Parkingg assignments for each 'of the resi- dential units shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prier to issuance of building permits. 9. If the school rite shown on the plan is to remain then an additional 3 acres shall be provided for city park purposes. 10. All streets within the project shall be private streets. ll. The .design of �h,e intersection ' of the private streets ' with public streets Shall be approved by the Department of Public' Works . 1.2 . If the .sewer and water facilities are to be dedicated to the City, a 10 ft. wide easement shall be dedicated to the City for access and maintenance of such sewer and water facilities. 13. Tree planting equivalent to one 30 inch box tree per unit shall be pro- vided. A plan showing such tree planting plan shall be approved bl the Planning Department and Department of Public Works. 14. A plan showing the wall design and landscape plan along all arterial highways :hall be submitted to the Planning Commission and Department of Public Works for approval prior to issuance of building permits . 15. Provisions shall be made to provide facilities for storage of equipment and materials -r als required by the associa- tion for maintenance of the project. Such areas shall be shown on the plat plan prior to issuance of building permits . 16 . All "Standard Conditions of Approval" for tentative tracts that are applicable shall be complied with. i 1? . Design of the carports shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments . Reasons given _by the Planning Commission for cneir action: ` ""- 1. Because this is an adult community, the overall population density will be less than the density of a standard Planned Residential Development having 7 . 25 units per acre, 2. Lot coverage is 26% which is less than a standard single family residential development . 3. Access to the, property 'can be restricted because. it is a. pr-.- vate adult deVelopm&Lt with entrance guards. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Bazil, Slates, Miller, Higgins, Kerins , Porter NOES: Duke ABSENT: . None THE MOTION CARRIED. Additional. information: Coaunissioner Duke stated that the planned 'iesIdential ord;aance is a new ordinance and the Commission has not hpj enough experience to allow the kind of development under a use permit application. Mr. Duke also felt that the Commission should give the requests further study before voting. William Shattuck, representing the applicant, spoke in favor. Speaking in opposition were the following property owners: Barbara Budris, David Welean, Marilyn Knowles, Abraham Gallas, Sallie Sergs, Gail Hedghes, Edward Cook, Phitlis Shike , Margaret Cook, Betty Fritzher, Muriel Farren, Dozothy Gordon, Terrylim Smith, Nancy Allen, Arthur Knowles, Jerry Vaneman, E. Greberman and Jahn Farren. Respectfully submitted , K. A '- Revnolds , Secretary KAR:dr STAFF REPORT TENT CZV A and 014'19USE: PERM� TRACT IT NO, 70-43 A pp11cant : Signal Lai dmark, Inc . ' DATE: Noveniber 17 , 1970 i The Subdivision Committee has reviewed Tentative Tract No. 5419 and Use Permit No. 70-43 and offers the follow- ing information for your consideration: 1 . The subject requests pertain to a 1 ,404 unit planned residential adult community situated on 140. 3 acres of land . The property is bounded or, the north by Indiana-olis Ave. , on the east by Magnolia St . , on the south by Atlanta Ave . and on the west by Newland Street. It is zoned RA and master planned for low density residential development. 2 . The following is a tabulation of the project : Gross aceeage - 140. 3 Commercial development - 7 .0 acres Residential development - 133 . 3 acres Total number of units - 1 , 404 Units per acre - 10. 53 3. The overall project will be divided into nine separate phases of residential development and one phase of commercial development. These phases coincide with the numbered lots on ttie tentative map. The appli- cant is requesting approval-of-the concept for the 133 acres of residential development and for specific approval of Phase 1 . 4 . Phase 1 is situated at the northeast corner of Atlanta Avenue, and Newland St.' The major recreation facility for the entire project is located in this phase. The following is a tabulation cf Phase 1 . Gross acreage -- 28. 1 acres Total number of units - 176 Area set aside for the major recreation facility for the entire 133 acres -- 8. 2 acres ; Gross area of Phase l minus recreation facility - 19.9 acres Units per acre - 8. 84 Building coverage minus recreation area)- 26. 63% Recreation and Open Space - 1200 sq . ft . per unit Parking: Covered parking required - 116 Cov red arking provided 187 Open perking required - 159 Open parking provided - 212 (Additional open parking is available along :he curb ow the 40 ft . loop street de- signed to serve as the major traffic carrier in the project. 5. There are 24 residential structures . Of these, 20 are two stories and contain eight snits each. Four are single story and contain fat,,-A- units each. The i following is a tabulation of the unit type: 1 bedroom, 1 bath - 53 2 bedroom, I bath - 70 2 bedroom, 2 baths - 35 3 bedrooms, — 18 These figures are approximate as the applicant proposes to develop approximately 10% of the units as :3 bedrooms , 60%, two bedrooms and 30% as one bedroom. 6. The maximum density of a planned residential develop- ment in the RI zone Is 7 . 25 units per acre. In this case , the applicant has proposed a density of 10. 53 units per oc:.e . The increased density has been re- quested because the project will be an adult cDmmunity having fewer people per household . The following is a comparison of the density permitted b1- ordinance with that requested by the applicant: UnitslAcre PersonslAcre Standard Subdivision .5 20 Planned Development 7 . 25 29* Applicant ' s Proposal 10 . 53 18** * The exact number of, persons per household found in a planned development is unknown; therefore, the factor of 4.04 persons per unit found in a standard subdivision has been used. Tie appi ran t : has stated that their studies of.,similar projects , speci- . fically .thdt of Leisure World Founds- " tion, indicated that a 'der ,, ity of 1 . 7 persons per household is -typical for an adult community. The Planting Department is in the pro- cess of verifying this information which should be available for the November 17 , 1970 meeting. 7 . The streets are to be private and will conform to City Standards . There is one main street through the pro- ject that will have a minimum width of 40 ft . from curb to curb. This section conforms to the standai:d for public streets. S . Other requirements such as street lighting, landscaping, trash collection areas, signs , etc. , have been discussed with the developer and will be taken care of as an ad- ministrative function of the Planning Department and Department of Public Works. There is one 15 acre jr. high school site; one 10 acre elementary school site and a 3 acre park site proposed for this quarter section. The 10 acre elementary school site has been purchased by the school district. However, the school district has indicated that the site may not be required because of the type of development that is proposed. There is also a possibility that the 15 acre jr. high school site may be located elr.ewhere. If both school sites are removed, there is no need for a park site on the property as the park site would be developed in conjunction with a school site. However, if the school district is unable to relocate the jr. high school site or :retains the elementary school site , a 3 acre park site will be required. It is the consensus of the staff that phase 1 of the project can proceed before the status of the school sites are determined. However, the status of the school { and park site should be known prior to phase 2 being submitted for r%view. 1.0. Access to the public streets has been limited to one access from Indianapolis Ave . and one access r"rom Atlanta Ave. The developer has chosen to limit the access points At these locations to provide additional security for the residents of the project. A guard house will be situated at each entrance to provide this security . In addi- tion, the developer proposes to provide a security patrol for the residents of the area , thereby re- ducing the need for the City police patrol . 11 . The developer proposes to limit this project to an adult community through the recordation of condi- tions , covenants and restrictions . 12. The development conforms to all requirements . of the Planned Residential Ordinance with the exception of the proposed density. As prevl.ozisiy II stated, the maximum density for a planned residen- tial development in the RI zone is 7 . 25 units per acre. In this case the applicant has requested a :Tensity of 10. 53 units per acre . I� A comparison in the density in the adult community with that of a planned residential development and of a standard subdivision is found under item no. 6 of this report . 13. Section 9413 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code permits exceptiorsto the Planned Residential require- meets and all, provisions of Division 9 under the use permit procedure when the applicant shows that the exception will not be inconsistent with the intent anu purpose set out for use permits in Section 9840 and the criteria for consideration of use permits set, out tin Section 9841 .4 or with the h t enL A id purpose of the Planned Residential Developments as set out in Section 9310, 14. It is the consensus of the staff that the density of 7 . 25 units per .acre was an indirect method to limit the number of persons residing IM a planned residential development. In this case , the developer proposes a density comparable to that found in a standard subdivision and in an R1 Planned Residential Development. The staff feels that if the C:&R' s can be written so as to guarantee that this project will remain an adult community, in perpetuity , that the intent of the density set forth for Planned Residen- tial Developments has been met . A letter submitted by the developer has been enclosed for your review. 15. if the Planning Commission concludes that the density proposed in this project: cneets the requirements of the ordinance code , the Subdivision Committee recom- mends that the following conditions of approval be considered: 1 . The tentative map received November 5, 1970 , the schematic of the overall plan for the use permit submitted on October 16, 1970 and the specific plan for phase 1 received November 3 , 1970 shall be the approved layout . Approval of the overall schematic of the use permit is general in nature and a specific plan for each phase shall be submitted for final review by the Planning Commission prior to final map being submitted to the City Council for ace.eptance . i 2. The quesrioh of whether or not the proposed 10 acre elementary school site , the 15 acre jr. high school site, and the 3 acre park site will be required, shall be resolved prior to a final map being recorded on phase 2 or. • building permits- issued for any construction w�:thin phase 2 . In the event a school site and park site are required , a revised overall plan shall be submitted to the Planning Com- mission for approval . 3. The conditions , covenants and restrictions shall contain a provision that will require the entire 133. 3 acres of residential pro- perty to remain as an adult community in per- petuity. The wording of such provisions shall be approved by the Planning Department and City Attorney ' s office . 4. Fire alarm boxes stall be provided at each of the guard houses. The gates located at each of the guard houses shall be open on a 24 hour basis. 5. No speed bumps shall be installed �;rr the main street . b. Each phase shall. stand on its own with regard to all requirements of the Huntington Bench Ordinance rode . 7 . Detailed plans of the recreation area shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for re- view and approval prior to issuance of building permits on the first phase. 8. Parking assignments for each of the residential units shall. be submitted to the Planning Depart- ment for approval prior to issuance of building permits. r 9. if the school site shown on the plan is to rem4in then an additional 3 acres shall be provided for city park purposes. j 10 , All streets within the project shall be private P 1 strset.s,, 11 , The design of the intersection of the private streets with public streets shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. III 12 . If the sewer and water facilities are to be deli- ..3ted to the City, a 10 ft . wide easement shall. be dedicated to the City for access and maintenance of such sewer and water facilities . L..,, free planting equivalent to apie 30 in. box tree- per unit shall be provided . A plan showing such tree planting plan shall be approved by the Plan- ning Department. and Department of Public Works . 14. A plan showing the wall design and landscape plan along all arterial highways shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Department: of Public: Works for approval prior to issuance of building permits . 15 . Provisions shall be made to Provide facilities for storage of equipment and materials required by the association for maintenance of the project. Such areas shall be shown on the plot plan prior to issuance of building permits . 16 "Standard Conditions of Approval " for tentative All Stan PP tracts that are applicable shall be complied with. i i a x FA OR CR 1 ,1.__� N CA 2 IE �cRD -�J SCHOOL... ViE TT5419 1 UP 7 43 - � a z ►'UERTO 7a Cr_ z _N z N � Q T C4� A MAAT,kuvE bR Ln 8 CAORSE T T C1R TT 5419 UP 5170-4 1 Locrf L j on: NE corner of At l,'+nta Ave . & Newland St . ,y.♦ v.vr+!!r.• tie r US17 ' PERMIT S.D.M. �'� FILING FEE 4 1L0 a j CITY. OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P O. BOX 190 DATE FiLED_. W -- Signal ,Landmark , Inc. COMMISSION ACTION DATE....._.__._._. .___.._ Q APPROVED APPLICANT OR AGENT 1538 No^th Century ©oufevard, Santa Ana in L_J CONDITIONALLY API�HG�.Et� ornia ,,Y � ��DENIED MAiLiNG ADDRESS a 92703 +- Q WITHDRAWN (714) 331 -6060 ? APPEALED CI YES NO PHONE NO. W COUNCIL ACTION DATE---.--. 9,43il Landmark____ Inc ._._Wx !_era9ch-old) 0,, SUSTAINED COMMISSION PIS•:>PERTY OWNER Q APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS o OTHER THAN COMMISSION DENIED MAILING ADDRESS Q WITHDRAWN � EFFECTIVE DATE._ TO PERMIT The. construction of a planned private adult community within the R-1 zone, with c+c'.1sity bf 10 .8 dwelling units per acre, together with appurtenant residential buildings and facilities, administrating buildings, and sales complex. L.004,10N OF PROPERTY (SIDE OF STREET , STREET NAME , DISTANCE FROM NEAREST INTERSECTING STREET) _.pounded by Atlanta avenue, Magnolia Street, Newland Street and Indianapolis Avenue. L .f.AL DESCRIPTiON SSE ATTACHED EXHIBIT ttA'c .USTIFICATION FILL OUT COMPLETELY ( IF MORE SPACE IS REQUIRED ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES) STATE REASONS WHY THE ESTABLISHMENT , MAINTENANCE , OR OPERATION OF THE USE OR BUILDING APPLIED FOR WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO : ( 1 ) THE GENERAL WELFARE OF PERSONS RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE VICINITY ; ( 2) OR INJURIOUS TO. PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF SUCH USE OR BUILDING. I Since the proposed development will limit occupancy to adults over the age of 40 years, the actual density of persons and automobiles per acre under the planned 10. 8 dwelling units per acre will actually be lower than the nnrrnal comparable density for an R-1 development. The deveiop,nent will al:;o offer privacy, security and recreational facilities superior to the usual R-1 develop- ment. .t SIGNAL L,,Mt • t.�hi, .f�tt� , It tf:' , SIGN RE OF PROPERTY OkVNER ORAIIdRIZED AGENT Tt2 ATTACHED SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET MUST BE READ AND SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT .nr L &, H(M ccarporetlon a 45W campus drive, suite 612 n newpo t beech, califomis 92660 o ph, 714 a 640.8302 EDWARD L.OLUNAxiodwK July 13, 1970 Mr. Lewis S. Akerman, Jr. N i , Vice President ?; Signal Landmark, Inc. 1538 North Century Boulevard Santa Ana, California 92703 i Dear Lew: f This letter is being written to you in response to your inquiry as to whether I have any information available concerning traffic patterns in planned com- munities. As you know, in addition to being associated witli the HCD Corporation, I am tonne-z;teri with the Leisure World Foundation, managing agent for the community of Rossmaor Leisure World, Laguna Hills. At Leisure World, Laguna Hills, entrance and exit from the community is through gates manned 24 house a day by security guards. A traffic Count on all vehicles is maintained. I am very pleased to be of assistance to you in this regard and wish to advise that our statistics show the number of vehicles entering and leaving the prexnisea during the Year 1969 averaged three per dwelling unit per day. � If I can be of any further assistance in this regard, please let and know. Very truly yours, • t • , tt EdwardrLs 01sesr housing community deveiop~t Q mlfNp ""t and opwatlan . Signal, `Landmark, Inc. 15�� ric�nh Cenly !7;�!o�trd Banta Art,0.011t,mr o.'M3 T4lophers:(71:; October 30, 1970 Planning Department t City of Huntington fie-+ ,'•r ' A*.fonlfon : Me=sera. Kennoih A. Reynolds and Richard Ha.-low G:nn0,1 e r.•,en V%ftt vi:r ka to elaborfate on our concept for the Development of appr oxir Aely 140 acres In Huntington Beach . i he n.xact facat!,'n Is shown on the enclosed map. The concept uncar consideration Is an Adult Community with- out children es permanent residents. It is our intention to offer adults the advantages of homeownership, coupled with, ;iie se purity of a privat,. wall co►-irnunity and recrentlen fac:ilitl©s that are in keeping with adult Interests. The entire site is to ba walled by an ornate mast ) wail with pnlvate gates the! are maintelned by !guards . entry will be limited to residents or, guests at specific request of the resider,i:. , The restricted use of entrances and inferior s!rects Is legally controlled by use of private streets on the Interi zor• of the level--;p- ment. These streets will be constructed to City code and r all).. tai ned by the owners . `l-he recreation facilities now antlelpated include minjor recreation buildings located In the interior of the project and several smell.r I)-Aprovements located within greenbelts throughout the project . -he rc. :t;it buildingg will provide under-roof facilities for dancln• . .. ;ilnin�j , card rooms, pool tables , class rooms, art workroornr, , pottery shops, wood working rooms r end sufficient space for 011".. additional services and activities that the homeowners wish to pro— I..-ide . Contiguous to this building will be outdoor lmprovements Including swimming pool, Jacuzzi, and shuttieborrd courts. Th4Z recreation facilltlos located in the greenbelt* will Include tennis , bowling on the gr©on, and putting greens, (continued. . . Afftttatod with Diino Propt+il",lm tyla of The signet Car:pantst CID 11119nat AAndmerk, Inc. Planning Department City cf Huntington Beach f-Aessers . Reynolds and Harlow 0-tobar 30, 1970 Page „ 2- ';tie Iltiitn-9 units anticipated are one and two story dwellings cold as a rondomium . Each owner will receive a lease- hold interost In thi Ilving unit and nn undivided leasehold fn(arest in the underlying land and recreational facilities . ,A buyer- will take title subject to covenants, conditions, and restrictions that stipulate the mandatory membership in a mutual organlZation. `Phis mutual will be vested with a responsibility i i to maintain this project. This mutual will have the power to collect monies from arch owner sufficient to pay all expenses resulting from the community facilities, private streets, and ayiterior maintenance of the dwelling units . This mutual will have right to lien any owners dwelling if the assessment i:.; not Pold. An Inlportant part of this concept Is the elimination of chlldron at.; potential residents within this project. We plan to cover thin subject thoroughly in the covenants , conditions , and restrictlon�w .. This provision will sight that a resident or one spouse must bc: of a specific age and that no children will reside in the dwellir.rj. We are currently considering an age minimum 'in the low 401s . I he enforcement of this provl-•Inn is normally the reversionary right of thq declarant. We plan to add additional protection through the use of an option to rep-irchase. Thai mutual will have the right of first refusal to pruchuse any resold unit 11 the new buyers do net meet the age requirements . `Phis type of remedy has proved effective in simular developments throughout the country , The adult couple or single adult without children often will look for a smaller dwelling than they had previously occupied and will specifically look for a residence that provides treasonable monthly obligations . We are confident that our concept will meat this demand and give Ilia added community atmosphere they desire. In order to assuro both these demands, we must generate a land use density that will support the planned amenities, Our projected overall yield requirement is 10. 8 units per gross acre . The adult communities now in existence have proven that a medium dwelling density does not create a population density or e traffic count In excess of normai FR-1 Subdivisions . To illustrate this iaolnt, vve hev,t obtained the following statistics from the L e'faure World Foundation and our own studies from existing i-1-t developmeritn. SiqnAl �sndn►srk, Inc. Planning Department City of Huntington Beach Messers. Reynolds and Herlow October 30, 1970 Wage -3- The average number of people per unit In an Adult Community is 1 .7 per dwelling. The average number of people per dwelling in a standard subdivision is 349. The average number of cars per dwelling In an Adult ! Community is 1 . 1 per unit. The average E number of cars p©r dwelling In a standard sub- division is 2 . 6 per building. When applied to acreage yields we can project the totals per acre , Zone Units per Acre People per Acme Cars. per Acre R--1 5000 5 . 0 19 .5 13 . 0 Adult Community • 10 . 8 18 . 4 11 . 9 i Wien evaluating these densities, we should remember that the adult occupants use of public facilities does vary considerably from the average - family formation. The average adult community auto travel is significantly less than the family unit with trips to 9 Y Y P school etc. Demands for park and recreational facilities are met within the walls of an Adult Community , in order to substantiate traffic patterns we have consulted H.C. M. Corporation of Newport E3each. A photo copy of their findings is enclosed herewith. This following comparison between Adult Community traffic and Standard Subdivision traffic clearly illustrates that our concept will produce less traffic than a normal R-1 dovelopment. Units Per Dally Trips "Total Dally Trips Zone Acre Per Unit Per Acre R-1 5000 5 . 0 10 50 Adult Community 10. 8 3 32. 4 The marketing of this type of development does creale some unusual financial burdens on the project. The most ot.vious problem Is the need for the major recreational faciliti©s to be complete prior to opening for salsas In the .first, unit . This illustration points out the need for an overall zoning designation the; assures us that future units will be approved it bulldin!E plans are satisfactory to the City:. 4 • Planning Department City of Huntington Beach Messers. Reynolds and Harlow October 30, 1970 P4ae -4- The advance+ planning of this concept has generated a list of advantages the development will provide : 1 . No additional demands for schools . 2. Full Property Tax Revenue. 3 . -No City cost to maintain streets . i 4. Proposed occupants good purchasing power for City Bales Tex. Respectfully submitted, SIGNAL. LANDMARK , It-.IC. Lewis S. Akermen, Jr . LSA/cr Enclosure r s h 1! at 1P. Share ld E. zV60400 r?: �► UP 70-43R Atlanta Ave . ti►2 t Kelvin Labe t4atgn. Sch. , Cal . 92646 Hntgn. beh. , Cal . 92646 Dennis E. Nagel Patricia R. Nm s J. F. bran 9042 Ca.rrol town Dr 20631 Kelvin Lane 20872 Mission Lars Hntga. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Wt Bch. C41 . J264b Hntgn. B+ch. , Cal. 92646 a. Stewart E4sterby Security taro Corp. Michael J. Piorl 20892 Mission Laney . l Corona x 691 ee C.a1 .926 3 20651 Kalvin 1an Hotgt. Bch. , Gal. . 92646 2 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92"6 .Tack E. Gordon Harold t. Hr:yes Colawbi*n N. Pars et al 9041 E 1 l svot t' h Dr. . 20892 Mission Lane Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 20661 Kelvin Lane Notes. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 ch 1Caland W. Patterson Seldon G. Shepherd Jr. I.era F. WeEer�ae r 9021 Ellsworth Dr . 209N Mission Lane Hntgn. Bh. , Cal . 92646 900I Qc . 0ad 1 . 92646 . C.HntBn, Bch. a 1. S .a 646 FtrutBn. Bch. Gu 1 i*Lso Y,aaccuri John H. Farren 991 Ellsworth Dr. Mack A. Farrell 20922 Mission Lane Hat . Bch. , Cal . 92646 9021 Oceeawoao l Dr . Nptsn. 1lch. , Cal . 92646lintEn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Clifford E. Bryant I � Hsnx� F. l�s►chraaA 20762 Kelvin Lane Irwin Barr 150 itosol Pl . 207Sa. Schelvi Cat . 9264�► 9031 Oceeanwood Dr. utereey p,krk , Cal . 905i Hntgn. Sch. , Cal. 92646 Mark R. E4endrix Allen D. Forsyth Vastor S. Rownd 20752 kelvin 9041 OcaeNu%vod Dr. $452 Snowbird Dr Untgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Hntgn. nch. Cal . 92646 lintSit. fth. , Cal . 92646 S Arnold C. Gayne law*it E. Ziegler Joseph G. 291,14're uton $442 Snowbird Dr . 20742 Tie loin Lane 9042 Five Dr. NntBn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Hntgn. Dch. , Gal . 92646 Hntgn. bch. t Cal.. 92646 Joseph Sasia Irving F. Grew G. P. Wollenberg l 20672 Nolvin Leas 90.32 Dive tia+rbors Dr. 8��32 Snowbird Dr. Hntgn, ftb. , C:al. 92646 • Yntgn. Bch. * Cal . 92646 �atBn. Bch. , Cal. 92C +6 Wed* C. workmn Edward A. Bu Aramur Development Co. 8431 Atlsxukat Av! . 20622 Kelvin Latta P. O. Box 3236 Hntgn. loch. , Cal . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Arwhsies, Cal . 92303 les Gerarden h E . Newcomb UP 70-43 ' 8 1 Reilly Dr. ' Crane Cir. . �v lintgn. Bch. , Ca1 , 92646 lintgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Elinor R•, Walt Ronald E. Johnson Hubert W. Nichols '. 8432 Reilly Dr . 8441 Reilly Dr. 8442 Crane Cir, I� Hntgn. .Bch. , Ca 1 . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 lintgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 C1 inton T. Thaaae,s Wm. M. Habermabl Rite M. Reardon 8422 Reilly Dr. 8451 Reilly Dr. 8432 Crane Cir. Nntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Hntgn. Bch . , Cal . 92646 lintgn. Bch. , Cal. 92646 Warren G. Bury RobarL J. Zinngrabe Rown Catholic Archbishop 8421 Tern Cir . 18792 Delaware St . of Los Angeles Hntgn . Bch. , Cal . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal , 92646 031 W. 9th St. Los Angeles, Ca1 .90015 Robert W. Clark Mania C• Loder Dorothy T. Pack at aI 8431 Tern Cir . S . Russell Ave . Bank of Acaerica,Trust leapt Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Monterey Park, Cal . 91754 111 W. 7th SL . Los A.nge l e s, Ca 1 .90014 . Byron L. Drury Brian L. Charsley Wellman B. Mills 8441 Tern Cir. 8441 heron C•ir. 425 19th Sr . Hntgn. Uh. , Ca i . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Santa Monica, Cal . 90402 .Lou$* Lames Wn. Hosk*wich Harold 11. Evans at al 16222 Monterey Ln, Sp,251 P .O. Box 1233 21042 Barbados Cir. lintgn. Bch . , Cal . 92 47 Running Springs , LAI .92382HnL�r. Bch. , Cal . S2646 Frank W Hopkins , Norberrt S . Crouse _ W. r Ji . SeaUury Development Co. 8462 Tern Cir . ; 8462 Heron Cir , P.O. Box 691 lintgn. Bch . , Cal . 92646 lintgn. Bch. , Cal . 91646 2711. E. Coast Hwy. Corona del Mir, Cal .92625 Leo L. Johnson Aseber Hansen Thmas Sedano Jr . 8442 Tern Ur. 1313 Morning sid- Dr. 21002 Barbados Cir. Hntgn. Bcl:. , Cal . 92646 Laguna Beach,Ce1 .92651 Hntgn . Bch , , Cal. . 92646 Thomas W. Sowyer Albert A. Allen, Jr. Ted Chuck 238 Kaoml Ave . 8441 Crane Cir. 21001 Barbados Cir, Arcadia, Cal . 91407 lintgn. 'Bch. , Cwt , 922646 Hntgn. Bch. ,Cal . 92646 Victor Tarry Helena E. Froelich 'Thsodere D. Beatty 537 Frankfort Ave. 8461 Crane Cir. 21021 Barbados Cir. intgn. loch. , Cal . 92646 ltntga. bah, t: 1 . 92646 lintgn. Bch. , cal . 92646 jkld, C . Davis P 70-43 9041 Colb 84 reggen Br . 32 . Mnl.l'oy Dr. 'y I Hot•gn. Bch. , WO 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cr1. 92646 T C. R. litchtll Steve Ramirer Lee D. Dodson . .-9002 Flve Narborx Dr. 9031 Colbre"an Dr. 6521 Segovia Cir. Htttstt, Beh- 9 Cal . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Rntgn. ach. , Carl . 92646 14rvoy F. Hilliard lx. n&-Hunting ton Enterprise Louis J. Riley Jr. 9DOI . Five Harbor# tar . 1533 Baker St . 844L Indianapolis Av• Nhtgn. Ech. , Cal . 92646 Costa Mesa, Cal .. 92626 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 5t*'. ey J. Farmor Four Seasons Horwa i3ella Bennett 902.1 Fine Harbors Dr. 1533 Bake kSt. 8451 Indianapolis Avant fin.. Bch. , C.a 1 . 92646 Costa Kesa, Cal . 92626 HNC . lintg,n. Bch . ,p(,,.a 1 . 92646 WM J. Doucette Anthony D. Basso S 9031 F, iv* Karbors Dr. 20551 Ca au Midland burn Ct . Robart La m :Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 fintgn. Bc-h. , Cal .92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Richard J . Ila}►ei 's James E. Rosenquist Chas. R. Calle 5041 Five Harbors Dr . 20561 Carllieburn Court 20441 Newland LSt. Nntg. Bch. , Ca1 . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Hntgn. Bch , , C,&1 . 92646 Robert L. Nichols Wo. G. Belohe Richard A. Mchelon 9002 Oce4nwood Dr. 9012 C.o lbrag an Dr. 20431 Newland St . Hntgn. Bch. Cal . 92646 Htgn. b.:.h . , �1 ► 92640 Hntgn . Bch. Cal . 92646 C��tanthe It. Spencer Jamos M. O' Hara Leo C. DrAmas 941A iceenwood Dr . • 9U32 Colbreggan Dr. 8422 IndlNnapo3tiar Ave. Him9n. Bch. , Cal . 92646 ltntgn. Bch. ,teal . 92646 Hiitgtl. Bch. , Ca1 . 92646 James R. ',-Reid Harold :i . Cross RasEaAr 1.. Ko 1 9032 Octanwood Dyr. 9042 Colbreggan Dr. $421 Ra�iy.11y Dz. ► 1 Hnt n. bch. , Cal . 92646 fhtt.gn. l3ch. , Gal . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , C 1 . 92646 . "ort . 3. Sant'ote Archdiacest of Loa AtigaIvt ,� . '9042 C�ceanw6od Dr . • Educ&tl.oti-A 4 Wel.fore Ce". ' RA C. Watdri� Hvit' in: :Bch. B4b2 Reilly Dr. g ,. Gel . • 9:�546 203b8� lSc�gnoli . Sty Hntgn, Bch. , C.;al. 92646 . x Hntgn. bch. r Cal 92646 wailace -P" Vds i rick l4ic:hac t J. Cvnt Richa�rd Grurik.a 667-' S`- Ors"ge. vrovs . ll1vJ . 2•0432 Dublin Late. 5372 Flint Dc* rai d*r►a', ' C-c 1 .911E 5 Itntgti�. ' C�1. ;'. C.a�3 . ''92646 : . }inRgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Erii+rmL so-iIluk WItourn up 70- 43 Kgn. 41 Minion Lane 2 visa:�.on Lane• - - loch. , Cal . 92646 l n. tech. , Ccl , 92646 Siaa I Lanftark , Inc . John A. Taylor Walter Stoyenowski . 1538 H. C�ncuxy Blvd . John Mission Lane 20832 Mission Tana Santa Aria, Cal . 92703 Hntgn. Bch. , kCal .92646 Rntgn . Bch. , kCal .92646 Allan T. Gisler Sam L. Terry Edward M. Whitford 819 Frankfort Hntg,n. Bch . , Cal - 92646 2Q721. Mission Lane 20842 Mission Lane ,• kintgn. Brh. , Cal . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646° W. T. Howland Estate l;tnuZ W. Jnm: moo . E. Sensec�be►ch P. S.Si teal Oil Box 17126 Gas 20722 Mianion lane 20862 Mission lams Foy Station Mntgn. Bch. , CAI . 92646 : Untgn. Itch . , Carl . 92646 Los Angvlm, s, Cs1 . 90017 Edward E. Straub Vincent P. LaFontaine V+ 20732 Mission Lane 8302 Alvarado Dr Hnrr.l. Bch. , Cal . 92646 lintan. Bch . , Cal . 92646 ' Evelyno F. Cochran et al Donald 0. Poff Barbara Averitt $/or Harvey 1 . Joneir 20742 Mission Lane 8432 Alvarado Dr. 20801 Mlsalon Lane Hw;gn. Wi. , Cal . 92646 llntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Hugh F. Spons a 1. Michael F. SMwba l Iona Rogger W. Cook 20752 Mission Lane 8442 Alvarado Dr . 20791. Mission Lane Hntgn . Bch. , Cal . 92646 rf Hatgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 tintgn. Uh. , Cal . 92646 James !C. Roberts Charles S . Underhill James J . Hazelton ~ 20781 Hitiion Lane 20762 Mission Lane ®43t Castilian Dr. � HnGBn. Bch . , CAL . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , kCal . 92646 Hntgn . Bch. , Cal . 92646 Robert E. Mare Wm. L. Adams Doanald E. Reed - ;,2.0771 Mission Lane 20772 Mission Ln. $441 Castilian Dr. -Hatgn. Bch. . W. . 92646 Hnt;gr,. Bch. . Cal . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Cordon. Sandviken Kirkwood S . Oleson James J . Tosh 207bX MissionLane8442 Castilian Dr. t Bch. , Coal . 92646 20782 Hiss6ota Lane Hntgn. Bch. , CAL . 92646 Mnt 1 }. , k' ltntgn. Bch. , CAI . 92 ra46 5. A. dakex Wattcr F. Pritchard She llien l eactxar u 20M Mission lane 20792 Mission Lane . 11523 S. Menlo Ave Apt . C, HntV.a Hntgn. Bch. ,Bch, , Cal . 92646 t Cats . 92646 Howthorne, Cal . 9,0250 h , Occupant UP 70-43 Martinique Dr. r ties lWgn. uh. , Cak. 92646 Patricir J. 0'Gr©ciy Occupant 21021 Shepherd Lane . 21031 Barbados Cir. Nntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Hatgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Edgard J . Occupant Smith 21031. Shepherd Lane Hutgn. Bch. , Cal . 92 646 21041 Barbados �:ir. F�tgn. Bch . . Cal . 92646 joseih D. Condon Occu ant ~ - 2104 Miramar I.,n. �,kNAV Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 21031 Cremnharo Lane Hntgn. Brh. , Calif - 92646 Marvin L. Opfer Occi:p+�nt 8621 Martinique Dr. 21032 1�tgn. Ac . � She Nord Lane Cal . 92646 fttgn. Bc . , Cal . 92646 Occupant Laguna Beach Counts Water 8561 Martinique: Dr . District, Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 306 3rd St. Laguna B"ch,C.a1 .92651 Occupant Staff A63t . Design B 8551 Martinique Dr . State Div . of Highways Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 P. O. ]Sox 2304 , Tern. Annex ' Los Angolea , Cal .90054 Occupant N. B. Elementary Sch-wl $541 Martinique Dx, . W - tom. 71S" 141 Hntgn. Belt. , Ka 1 . 92646 Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Attaz Diet . Supt . - Occupant H.B. Union High :,,A ,f1ia►r 8531 Martinique Dr. 1902 - Pth St . Hntgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Hnthn. Bch. , Cali . 92646 Occupant . 8521 Martinique Dr. Untgn. Bch. , Cal . 92646 Occupant .8,511 Martinique Dr. Hntgn, Bch, Cal . 92646 11/15/70 Publish M2 PUBLIC HEARING SET Postcards 148 FOR: # ..,; NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL - USE PERMIT NO, 70-43 I' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Changer of the Civic Center , Wintington Beach, at the hour of 7 :30 P.I . or as soon thereafter as possible, on Mundy the 7-th day of December 1970, for the purpose of considering an appeal to the granting by the City Planning Comission F of Use Permit No. 70-43, to allow the construction of a 1404 unit planned residential development on approximately 140.3 acres of land in the R1 Single Family Residence District. The subject properL-y Is located beWeen Indianapolis and Atlanta Avenges and Newlana and Magnolia Streets . A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing &nd express their opinions for or against said appeal to UP 70-43. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. DATED: November 20, 1970 CITY OF• HUNTINGTON BEACH $y: Paul C . Jones City Clerk . December 3, 1970 Tlit: Honorable Donald Shipley Mayor of Huntington Beach California City Hall Huntington Beach, California 92646 Dear Sir; j After reading; a recent article in the Huntington Beach News about a Planned Adult Community that Signal Landi-nark Cornpany has proposed for development at the corner of Atlanta and Magnolia Streets, I was surprised to hear that a number 4 peoples have objected due: to the fear that it wu•uld lower the value of their pruperty. As e� Agent r Seabury Humes which is just. s •uth of the �ro- Sales Al,� n for y ,} { }used de ve lopme fit, I have talked to many of they 390 h- •moowne rs 'ii(Jw living in Seabury Homes aboitt the Signai Landmark project, aiid I found almost all of them in favor of it. Most -)f tht�st• new Hutitington Beach residents believe that over the years it will raise- their pro- perty values. Before buying in Seabury Homes many buyers want to kno.c what is planned for the vacant land just north (,f Atlanta Avelit►e .ts most fear their property value would be lowered if ]t:,-. ( Est liuus inn "%,as constructed un this site. - ltho%q f'. tt:• Kt +f the Svabnry residents are new to the City ,)f Huntinplt --n Beach and a.; yet have no organized reprusentatior., I do believe there i--. strong 5tap,')ors for the Signal Landmark Adult Community Project frown marry of bw h, tnvowners of Seabury Homes . Vary trtily vours , SEABUJi Y HOMES Jrs. , ,; e. , _ .... . Hai Crt-g,tn !i Sales A gent HC;Is ti November 25, 1970 Honorable Donald Shipley 76 and Members of the City Council � City of Hunti n;ion Beach City Hall Huntington Beach, California 92646 Gentlemen: It has been brought to my attention that Signal Landmark Inc. is proposing a planned community development to be located on the parcel directly behind our home. � . A etition has been passed in our neighborhood to oppose this development because of density, etc. In order to make a reasonable determination, I contacted Signal Landmark to personally review their plans. As a result of this research my wife and I are convinced that this project is not only desirable but needed to give a goad bal- ance to our residential area. Controlled, planned communities, particularly for agesr40 and over, have proven to be beneficial from the standpoint of all interested parties. We would welcome this development as our neighbor and encourage your favorable action on Signal Landmark's request. Hopefull , this type of community would not require additional school (s� even though the master plan calls for elementary and Junior high schools to be located on this site. Certainly, this development would not require additional schools thus relieving taxpayers of another burden. Your consideration of these comments is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, 1,vyj41e-- Wal ter. F. Pritchard II 20792 Mission Lane Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 November 27, 1970 ti Honorable Donald Shipley and Members of the City Council Huntington Beach City Hall Huntington Beach, California Gentlemen : Being unable to be present at your City Council meeting on December 7, 1970, due to a business trip, I would like to convey through this letter my reaction in behalf of granting Use Permit No . 70- 43 approval . This is one of the few projects I have seen that benefits the community in forms of tax relief, better service to existing facilities and a needed enviorment for those with grown children . To briefly qualify my beliefs, I'll reiterate on these : 1 ) The savings to the school district by eliminating one school is substantial , besides allowing the specialist in the district to reapportion their assign- ments to other schools and those needy of their help. 2 ) The maintenance and repairs on the streets and utilities within the area in a conventional sub-division can now be eliminated, which enables other parts of the City to receive better service. 3 ) An enviorment that I know my mother, other relatives, or my wife and myself can move into when our family is grown and be active and feet like part of City ' life, without the worry of something happening to us by living alone. (continue(J. .:. ) Page -2- Again, I wahtl to give my support for such a project. Thank you, , Respectfully yours, Mr . and Mrs. Richard Russell 10091. Cutty Sark Huntington Beach, California 92646 j. J, KNICKERBOCKER DEALER FURNITURE do CARPETING �dJ1XXltKl£dLtYt,Y 3�x; 1�G7xlf�+tX�r??�;x �GtO?LY.X«1tX9 :#ODC 18582 3eaoh Boulevard , Huntington Beach 962-3351 December 3 , 1970 City Council City of Huntington Beach Gentlemen: .his a businessman and a taxpayer in the city of iuntington Reach I wish to express my approval of the proposed adult community to be constructed by ,",i.gnal Landmark . The proposed site is to be near Adams and Mag.'iolia streets . A development containing 11,00 family or earning, unit; at the peak of their productive and earnin, years would be benC-ficial to the business interests of any city. To obtain these benches without the added burden ni' overcrowded schools, pnr'cs , etc ., makes a project such as this ss asset to our c.om:nuni ter . 'Incerely yours , J . J . K:11CK EllBoll"K:- rR � i?J Ani.ckerbocker Ovmer JJK/ec - HUNTINGTON BEACH CHAMBER of COMMERCE 1 Q562 BEACH BOULEVARD SUITE 224 HUNTINMON SEACK CALWOnNIA f•k Fr December 7, 1970 TanDtiONE U14) gti -eml ftlNT NGTON BEACH ^ y. . OFFICERS Honr de Mayor Donald Shipley Pr"Unt and Cicy Council I4t rn» Huntington Beach �. )[eI7os+►dl-Ihnnr W :. .aat�ontutiia bnaa•+v " rim 111im Para" Re: Signal Landmark Proposed Adult Community Project $Mond vior Prs+ ent SrA. A4rr=xo Gentlemen• Wvvbms Cms^ar rr rAtm D*Gtx ux The attention of the Chamber of Commerce has drawn ansm Ow=mnr to the referenced 'project. DIRECTORS G H. "Beta."Wart H files While our policy has been to neither approve or disap-- Atteraw prove of a residential project, we do feel that there are v �war vidlo certain facets of this now and unusual concept which would spor""" ' offer substantial advantages to the community, citizens, Don Ihnm" ' '"'u"' Oft-ksamtkm business s and prospective residents which will be attract- t�+�oAM ed to the community as a rosult of saire: JAM Pxw"" 00%#Lhem 0watsw aeu mmvwly These advantages are: MAX FOXMxr u�►'r' D1c A 94*4 (1) A substantially increased tax base:.e` 11qon= 3 �a (2) Reduded tax outlay due: to a lesser require- 21Atirm Runk JAM GWT9 ment for City services of all types. 0"" Ma"Ohl AMAft TEUM rs 1U X p (3) benefits to the City School District without Wf"Vt., ft" increased school and education services load . BrArs of N s,&XII *04 Mom amity Au'' "'``' ` ,; (11) Creates job opportunities and resultant eco- Unn .:MAMMY namic benefits to: mww ww (a) Business �C�� a. roc. c�.e„Kw►. I, M, K w-& (b) Service Organizations Imo AA"xa (c) City of Huntington Beach. RUWWO WAz IX&A rint NAM"a ""o In conclusion our analysis of the proposed project is Ckroft nuwt.,re lhgt�*.ts Wwr a favorable one in which all will benefit appreciably. J. C.RR"W onww.r PALM G Kr,nu •rstfw ,�►, of very. rY truly, . . Peter H P'reaident FHl w