HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Permit 86-6 - Conditional Exception 86-3 - Foodmaker, In (12) AQ11%0(1190 13 FuOuM Aoipiammonts of aN btod1 0Vaw*w#q PuWK
Qaticde of owme Of the Sup«w+ couti of otanae County,
Cfa 101114, NuTbW A-6:14, tenor 29 S9P19ffltW 1161, •nd '
A-14831 "Nd 11 Jeff. 11163
STATE OF CALIFORMA y
County of Ora"" P~ w.«+. •...► " tevold
1 am a Citizen of the United States and a rec.dent of G��� ,
the County aforesaid, t am over the ape of efghtaetl
�+
years, and not a party to or interested in the below iJ . -, ►Ir�
entitled matter. 1 am a ptincipol clerk of the Orange
Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the +
NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa,
County of Orange, State of California. and that a
Notice of PUBLIC HEARING
Of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete
copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa,
Newport Seam. Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley.
Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna
Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TINS_
colimuiwe weeks to wit the issue(s) of
I
Se tember 4 6
198
198
t96
1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the
foregoing is true and correct,
Executed an September 4 �98 6
oa a Mesa, Calif niatt.
C
I atwr
00
2
rpm%`
CrTY OF HLW4TVQGTONAjft
3000 MAIN STI IT CALIRMNIASOM
orPlq or"a CITY CLM
September 17, 1966
John A. Emanualli
Region Construction Manager
I JACK IN ?NE IOX Division
` POODlN1M s INC.
f 9040 Salstar Avenue, Suite 121
E1 Monte, California 91731
The City Council of the City of Huntington Seach geld a public Marius on
September 15, ON to consider your appeal to the Plaon.ta6 Commission's denial
of Use Permit No. 66-6 and Conditional Exception No. 56-3. Council approved
the revised plans with findiajs and conditions of approval including modifies-
tion in the sign to be worked out with the applicant and staff. A further
motion to approve a twenty►-five foot sign failed.
If you have any questions regarding the matter please contact Jim Palin,
Director of the Development Services Department at 536-5271.
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clark
AMW:CS:es
Enclosure
cc: Jim Fella, Development Servicea Director
REQUEST FOR CrrY COUNICI ACTION
Dow September 15, 1906
&*W* to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
&AM*%W Charles W. Thompson , City Administrator �� w �
James W . P P. by: James Director , Development Services
Mot. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL OF USE RMIT 110.
86-6/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86- 3
Comkwt with Council Policy? I%,k4a ( New Policy or Exos+p km
S:atwnmt of law. RwAxnmuWation, Analysis, Funding Source, A hwrwtive Actiorie, Att mWents:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Transmitted for your consideration ii, an appeal by Foodmaker , Inc . to
the Planning Commission ' s denial of use Permit No. 86-6/'Conditional
Exception No . 86-3 . Use Permit No . 86--6 is a request to reconstruct
a 2 , 100 square foot drive-thru restaurant . Conditional Exception No .
86-3 is a request to allow 32 on-site parking spaces in lieu of 35
required parking spaces .
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council sustain
the action of the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Planning Commission
and deny the requests .
ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY PORTER, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
SUSTAINED THE DENIAL OF THE HOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS AND DENIED
USE PERMIT NO. 86-6/COVDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-3 BASED ON FINDINGS,
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES : Rowe , Winchell , Schumacher , Livengood, Erskine , Porter ,
Mirjahangir
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: 11one
FINDIHC:: FOR DENIAL - USE PERMIT 110. 86-6 :
1 . The establishment , maintenance and operation of the proposed
2 , 100 square foot drive-thru restaurant will be detrimental to:
a . The general welfare of persons residing or working in the
vicinity because of potential ingress, egress, and stacking
at proposed driveways on MacDonald Avenue and Beach Boulevard;
ple aM
0
b. property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or
building because the proposed project will not be compatible
with surrounding structures .
2. The granting of Use Permit No. 86-6 will adversely affect the
General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach .
3 . Recent observations of similar drive-thru restaurants on Beach
Boulevard have indicated an average of 13 stacking spaces needed
for peak hours .
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 110. 86-3 :
1 . Because of the size, configuration , shape and lack of unique
topographic features of the subject property , there does not
appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved
that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the
same district .
2 . Since the subject property can be fully developed within the
required setbacks , such a conditional exception is not necessary
for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights .
3 . The proposed on-cite parking and circulation plan is inadequate
and have the potential of creating a congestion and circulation
hazard at the proposed shared driveway located can MacDoiiald
Avenue.
4 . Ingress and egress to the site at the shared driveway located on
MacDonald Avenue has the potential of creating additional traffic
impacts .
5 . The possibility of stacking onto Beach Boulevard has the
potential of creating a major traffic hazard because the existing
parking lane on Beach Boulevard will become a travel lane as the
result of the "Super Street ' improvements .
ANALYSIS:
On May 21 , 1986, the Board of Zoning Adjustments denied Use Permit No .
86-6 and Conditional Exception No. 86-3 by a vote of 5--0. The Board
of Zoning Adjustments agreed with staff 's evaluation that the number
of variance requests represented too great a departure from the
provisions in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Staff indicated to
the applicant that the proposed square footage for the building needed
to be reduced in order to comply with the provisions of the Huntington
Beach Code Ordinance .
RCA - September 15 , 1986 (61444 )
The applicant appealed the Board of Zoning Adjustment denial to the
Planningq Commission And submitted a proposal to the Planning
Commission which eliminated most of the variance requests and also
provided an ir,.proved circulation and parking plan . Reciprocal access
was obtained from the property owner of the recently approved motel
project located adjacent to the subject site . In addition, staff
indicated to the applicant that the proposed elevations for the new
restaurant building should be architecturally compatible with the
recently approved motel .
The original request for Use Permit No. 86-6 was for the construction
of an approximately 2,500 square foot drive-thru restaurant . The
proposed square footage of building for the original request required
the need to deviate from the parking and landscape provisions in the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . The revised plan dated September 5,
1986 , reflects a reduction of square footage of the building. The
revised plan indicates a parking space deficiency of three ( 3 ) spaces
which staff feels is a significant ir.!provement over the original plan.
Staff has evaluated the revised plan and staff feels that if the
drive-thru entry was modified to encourage better circulation this
would serve to mitigate staff ' s concerns regarding potential stacking
of automobiles on Beach Boulevard . In addition, the reciprocal access
and parking agreement with the adjacent property owner will serve to
off-set the three ( 3 ) parking space reduction request . Staff has met
with the applicant on numerous occasions and staff perceives that a
design solution is attainable . A revised plan illustratingg the
drive-thru entry will be on display at the September 15, 1986 City I
Council meeting.
k
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS :
The proposed project is exempt Class 1 Section 15302 from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act .
FUNDING SOURCE:
Not Applicable
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
As an alternative action, the City Council may consider a modified
plan which would depict a defined entrance for the drive-thru
entrance. This would serve to mitigate the concerns of staff
regarding potential stacking onto Beach Boulevard . At a meeting on
September 8 , 1986 , the applicant agreed to the modification to the
drive-thru entrance . Based on the agreement , staff would support
approval of Use Permit No . 66-6 and Conditional Exception No. 86-3
based on the following findings and conditions of approval .
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL USE PERMIT NO. 66-6 :
1 . The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed 2100
,square foot drive-thru restaurant will not be detrimental to:
RCA - September 15, 1904 =3- (61446)
8. Service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire
Department, shall be posted and marked .
i
9. Applicant shall pursue CalTrans approval of radius type driveways
on Beach Boulevard .
10 . MacDonald Avenue driveway shall be minimum 27 foot wide radius
type driveway.
11 . An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and
installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations.
12 . The major identification sign shall be removed or altered to
comply with Article 961 within ninety ( 90 ) days of approval of
Use Permit No. 86-6 .
13 . All signage shall comply with Articles 961 of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code . The free-standing sign shall be
low-profile , monument-type . A planned sign program shall be
submitted and shall be subject to the review and approval of the
Director of Development Services .
14 . Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking
facilities , water heaters, and central heating units .
15 . Low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets .
16 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber , wire, pipe , and
other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an
off-site facility equipped to handle them.
17 . if lighting is included in the parking lot , high-pressure lamps
shall be used for energy savings . All outside lighting shall be
directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties .
18 . If foil -type insulation is to be used , a fire retardant type
shall be installed as approved by the Building Division .
19 . The subject property shall enter into irrevocable reciprocal
access and parking agreement between the subject site and
adjacent property.
20 . Provide an 8 foot high block wall along the rear property line
beginning directly across from the southern building face, and
extending north to the interior property line.
21 . The City Council reserves the right to revoke Use Permit No . 86-6
if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington beach
Ordinance Code occurs.
i
ItCA - $eptembtt lb, 1986 w5- 61+1it� 1 J
0
PINDINGS P'OR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 66-3 :
1 . Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique
topographic features of the subject property, there appears to be
exc"ption or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply
generally to property or class or uses in the same district .
2.. The proposed structure will be compatible with adjacent
properties .
3 . The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not
be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working in the
vicinity .
4 . On site parking and circulation will be adequate and will not
have the potential of creating a congestion and circulation
hazard.
5. Ingress and egress to the site will not exacerbate traffic
impacts to Beach Boulevard and MacDonald Avenue .
SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-3 :
1 . A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the modification
described herein :
a . drive thru entrance on Beach Blvd. shall be modified to
depict a defined entry .
2 . All conditions of approval for Use Permit No . 86-6 shall apply .
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Appellant 's letter dated August 8 , 1986
2 . Minutes of the August 5. 1986 Planning commission meeting
3 . Area Map
4 . Site Plan dated September 5, 1986
5 . Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 5, 1986
JWP :RLF : jr
RCA - Siptember 15, 1966 -6- (6164d )
At J,
. r
INC OM telstar Amnue Suite 121. El Monte. Ca c",00 91731 (818) 5 71-766 7
August 8, 1986
City of Huntington Beach
Planning Department '
P.O. Box 190 -+
Huntington Poach. CA 92648
RE: Conditions) Exception No. 86-3 r-4 '
Use Permit No. 86-6 ; �. go
Gentlemen:
We wish to appeal the Planning Commission's decision of August 8th to
the City Council for t0he following reasons:
A . The Planning Commission and staff have based their decision on
the traffic engineer's opinion which has no basis of fact.
B. City Ordinance No. 2828 , effective 5/21/86 dots not mandate is 13
car stacking lane.
C. With the reciprocal parking agreement imposed on the ■djecent
proposed hotel property , we meet all City codes .
D . Rebuttal of questions asked to staff was not permitted, and
therefore the Commission's understanding was not clear.
R. Mr. Pattel. the Developer of the hotel, would prefer that we
have our own driveway on MacDonald. Tho removal of this drive
will adverse!y impact the driveway on Beach Blvd.
F. A statement was made by a Commissioner that all the remodels
made by Jack in the Box have Incorporated monument dgns.
This statement is (aim. We have recently completed remodels in
Long beach, Inglewood, and Sunset Belch where our existing
pylon signs remained; and we have permits for our mtsurent on
Bosch ! Bishop scheduled to start remodeling approximtely
8/Zi.
Chy
8——gftn siseb
G. Other drive-thru facilities on Beach Blvd. are enjoying the use
of their land under similar characteristics proposed by our
develapeient which we are being deni*d, such sa Cori's Jr. an
Beach p!vd. • Yorktown; Taco Bell on Beach Blvd. I Garfield;
McDo7nald's on Beach Byrd. 6 Rubtdouz; and Burger King on
Beach Blvd. 6 MacDonald.
We appreciate the opportunity for appeal and wish to be scheduled for
your meeting to be held September 15 � 1986.
Sincerely ,
FOOD AKKA , INC .
Joh A. Emenuelli
Re on Construction Manager
JA K tN THE BOX Division
JAE:bis
I
0
C--3 APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT' S DENIAL OF USE PERMIT
NO. D ONBITIN—AL EXCEPTION -
The a peal to the Board of Zoning Adjustment 's denial of Use Permit
No . 8M and Conditional Exception No . 86-3 was continued from the
July 15 , 1986 Planning Commission :meeting, with the applicant ' s
concurrence , Use Permit No . 86--6 is a request for the construction
of an approximately 2 , 500 square foot drive-thru restaurant located
at .16311 Beach Boulevard (northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and
MacDonald Avenue ) and Conditional Exception No. 86-3 is a three--fold
variance request: ( l ) to reduce the minimum 27 foot turning radius;
(20 to reduce the minimum 10 foot aide landscape planter width to A
feet; and ( 3 ) reduce the required number of parking spaces from 42
to 29 spaces .
On May 21 , 1986, the Board of Zoning Adjustments denied Use Permit
No . 86-6, Conditional Exception No . 86-3 by P. vote of 5-0. The
Board of Zoning Adjustments agreed with staffs evaluation that the
number of variance requested represented too great a de jarture from
the provisions in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . Staff
indicated to the applicant that the proposed square footage for the
building needed to be reduced in order to comply with the provisions
of the Huntington Beach Code Ordinance.
The applicant requested a continuance at the July 15# 1906 Planning
Commission meeting in order_ to submit a site plan which would
eliminate most of the variance requests and also provide an improved
' circulation and parking plan . Reciprocal access was obtained from
the property owner of the recently approved motel project located
adjacent to the subject site and staff has encouraged the applicant
to integrate reciprocal access with the motel site along the
MacDonald Avenue frontage . In addition, staff indicated to the
applicant that the proposed elevations fur the new restaurant
building should be architecturally compatible with the recently
approved motel .
Staff stated that the plan does not
Q provide for an adequate stacking i
area for the drive-thru Vacility . This would have a serious
negative impact on Beach Boulevard when the "Super Street'
improvements are made . It would remove the parking lane on Beach {
Boulevard . Thus , any stacking onto Beach Boulevard would have a
serious impact .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS :
The proposed project is exempt Class 2 Section 15302 from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act .
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
A representative from Jack In The Box spoke in support of the
project . He stated that the facility has been redesigned( the
square footage reduced; and agreement from the adjacent motel owners
had been received for reciprocal parking . He was surprised that
constraints had been recently placed on his project and that an
already large investment had been wade.
PC Minutes - ejS166 -9i t59i1�1�
f
John Reanuel l i , kegional Manager , Jack In The Saxe spoke its support
Of the project . He discussed his stacking plan* for the prof*ct and
showed comparable plans . He :%1so stated that he is ttying to
increase sit-down husintsa .
There were no other persons present to speak for or against the
project and the public hearing was closed.
i
The Commission felt that the egress/ingress on the project needed
xis-addressed and that a low profile monument sign mould be prof*rr*d
at the site . They were also concerned with potential stacking
problems . They suggested that a continuance be granted in order to
allow staff time to sit down with the applicant and produce a plan
which would comply with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and
address the concerns regarding potential stacking onto Beach
Boulevard .
The applicant did not choose to have a continuance .
A MOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHERt SECOND BY PORTER: TO UPHOLD THE
DECISION OF THE BOARD OF ZON7EIG ADJUSTMENTS AND DENY USE PERMIT NO.
86-6 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86- 31 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES : Rowe , Winchell , Sch►amacher , Livengood , Erskinc , Porker ,
Mirjahangir
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
NOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 86-6 :
1 . The establishment , maintenance and operation of the proposed
2 , 100 square foot drive-thru restaurant will be detrimental to:
a . The general welfare of persons residing or working in the
vicinity because of potential ingress , egress , and stacking
at proposed driveways on MacDonald Avenue and Beach boulevards
b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or
building because the proposed project will not be compatible
with surrounding structures .
2 . The granting of Use Permit No. 86-6 will adversely affect the
General Plan of the City of Huntington beach .
3. Recent observations of similar drive-thru restaurants on Mach
Boulevard have indicated an average of 13 stacking spsces noodod
for peak hours.
PC Minutes - •/�/bi -ia- �slil�I
' I
I
{
F NRINGS FOR DENIAL Or CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86--3 :
11 because of the site, configuration, shape and lack of unique
topographic feature* of the subject property, there doves not
appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
cond W orals applicable to the land, buildinqs or promises involved
that ooes not apply generally to property or class of user in the
same district .
2 . Since the subject property can be fully developed within the
required setbacxs , such a conditional exception in not necessary
for the preserva`ion and enjoyment of substantial property rights .
3 . The proposed on-site parking and circulation plan is inadequate
and have the potential :)f creating a congestion and circulation
hazard at the proposed shared driveway located on MacDonald
Avenue .
4 . Ingress and egress to the site at the snared driveu3y located on
MacDonald Avenue has the potential of c-.eating additional traffic
impacts .
5 . The possibility of stackin onto Beach Boulevard has the
potential of creating a malor traffic hazard because thn existing
parking lane on Beach Boulevard will become a travel lane as the
result of the "Super Street" improvements .
.1•
C-4 E CHANGE NO. 86-22 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-39
After ca ully reviewing the mechanism for adding suffixes in the
Huntington ach Ordinance Code and the intent of this zone change ,
i . e . to incr a the density so that an identical number of units are
permitted on t se lots after the additional right-of-way and
improvement of 1 Avenue (between Beach Boulevard and Silver Lane)
is completed, a has determined a more appropriate zoning
designation which w ensure equitable zoning .
The method outlined in a code for adding a density suffix to the
district specifies that t number used regulate* units per gross
acre . With these particul lots , most of which are small in ire and
are not normally entitled to a the gross site area , a problem
develops in ( 1 ) coming up with fair number of units per gross acre ,
and ( 2 ) one which results in th p�-•rnpriate density being allowee for
a given lot . Further complicatin he problem is that the gross site
area would include the total 40 foo eil Avenue right-of-way as well
as another 30 feet of Alhambra Drive .
For these reasons, staff has determined t a 'Q' (qualified
classification ) added to the R2 zoning is best, simplest, and most
appropriate way to address the problem. The would include only
one condition, that is,
I'
PC Minutes - 8/5/86 -ll- i�lAxA)
(a ) For purposes of calculating density, where
Section 9120.3 of the Huntington Be ;ch Ordinance
Code specifion that net site area shall be used,
these lots •hill be entitled to add twenty-five
feet of the Heil Avenue right-of-way to net site
area due to the dedication and improvement
required to widen Heil Atrenue .
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Zone Change
j No. 66-22/Negative Declaration No. 66-39 to the meeting of August
19 , 1966, to allow time for a zone change ordinance to be prepared
and (Advertised describing the change from R2 to (Q)R2 .
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
There was no one present to speak for or against the Zone Change .
A MOTION WAS! MADE BY PORTER, SECOND BY MIA.;AHANGIR, TO +'ONT. INUR ZONE
CHANGE NO. 86-22/NEGATIVE DECLARTION NO. 86- 39 WITH THE PUBLIC
HEARING LEFT OPEN TO THE AUGUST 19, 1906 PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
i
AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Schumacher , Livengoodt Erskine, Porter ,
Mirjahangir
NOES: None
ABSENT: Nome
ABSTAIN: None
NOTION PASSEL)
w sI N
I '
C-5 CONDI'TIONAI. EXCEPTION MO. 66-48 x`
Conditional Exception No . 66-46 is a request to perndt a building
height of 32 foot 6 inches and to allow for a 6 fort cut in the rear
yard so that a swimming pool can be constructed . The subject
property is located in Country View Estates , earn of Edwards and
south of Ellis Avenue .
The property is zoned Q--RI-( 2 . 7 )-0-8,000. In addition to the Rl
standards , additional development criteria for the property is
contained in the Conditional Use Permit 82-3 and Tentative Tract
11473.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS :
The proposed project is exempt 'Class V Section 15305 from the
provisions of the California , Environmental Quality Act ,
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPtNED
Eric Mossman, archite , spoke in support of the project .
1
K Minutes - ilsla6 -l2� tSf�Y+81
C4 1 f G2 = ` \ c
Me C 2 C 2 `.
IL-_ ."- - R3
- - ~ cr-0 R3 C 2
ml
RZ c a _
ml
ml
R �
N A w s► �+ w w w w �
�- C4 M
f�. lip
pe '- • f C2 ■
• �: .
�F
spillINOWN NEACH PLMOMM
... • . • so
•• • • • •
MINED
• • • • • • •
I
M i '
s
- READ •OW
,' � •.�_-".. � '3t� b��-F8 ��wr spar• . ;
ILY4. icel S
4
f ,
•. • •
CA
41
�•flr. � a Yw��
. •.••V.•• s Y s
- 1 •.
t 1• tY
i • ti �
s
r
no
s
HUNTINGTON @EACH+
DEVELOPMENT SERy1Cca
P.O. Box I0 ,
Huntington Beach, CA 94548 ;
__ - - ----- - -- -_ ?tom •02.63
.3 t w-aw i *46 1
i►ATE &-2-80 1 WWWi t
;AACL�0%0W AVE
off.
Rtt 4GTON BEACH CA. I
co,L7
t
t 1AAC00NALD AVENUE
SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN '
f
' '�
WIN be"N do" ONVINO
OWMAEPORIM-
TO: Planning Commission
PROM: Development Services
DATE: August 5, 1906
SUBJECT: APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT' S DENIAL OF
USE PERMIT NO. 86-61CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-3
APPLICANT: Foodmaker , Inc. DATE ACCEPTED:
9040 Telstar Avenue June , 1986
Suite 121
E1 Monte , CA 91731 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE:
RE EST: Appeal to BZA 's denial of August 17,,
1986
Use Permit No . 86-6 and ZONE: C4 ( Highway
Conditional Exception No . =o aercial District )
86-3. Use Permit No. 86-6 :
the cons ruc ono! air GENERAL PLAN: General
approximately 2, 500 sq . ft . Commercial
car ive--thru restaurant .
Conditional Exception No. EXISTING USE: An existing
t nee- o van - 500 sq. t . Jack-in-the-box
ance request : 1 ) to reduce drive-thru restaurant
the min . 27 ft . turning
radiusl 2) to reduce AC� RBAGE: . 52 acres
min . 10 ft. wide land-
scape planter width to LOCATION: 16311 beach Blvd.
8 ft . ; and 3) reduce (northwest corner of teach
the required number o: Blvd. and MacDonald Avenue )
parking spaces from 42
to 29 spaces .
1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION:
Uphold the Board of Zoning Adjustment 's denial of Use ^ermit No .
66-6/Conditional Exception No. 86-3 based on findinv4 outlined in
this report .
2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION:
The appeal to the Board of Zoning Adjustment ' s denial of Use Permit
No. 86-6 and Conditional exception No. 96-3 was continued from the
July iS, 1986 Plannin mission meeting, with the a licant 's
concur genre. as owl, } i• 6 & id Seams Ad
d�Nle Ore reratt. w0co- a l� 1 ft f1.
{
NM
r
,
4
3
dONAAMAMA Lad
r.
The applicant requested a continuance at the July 15, 1946 Planning
Commission meeting in order to submit a site flan which would
eliminate most of the variance requests and a..so provide an improved
circulation and parking plan . Reciprocal access was obtained fioa
the property owner of the recently approved motel project located
adjacent to the subject site and staff has encouraged the applicant
to integrate reciprocal access with the motel site along the
Macdonald Avenue frontage . In addition , staff indicated to the
applicant that the proposed elevations for the new restaurant
building should be architecturally compatible with the recently
approved motel ,
3. 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DMIGNA►TIONS:
North of Sub ect Property:
I
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION; General Commercial
ZONE: C4 ( Highway Commercial District )
LAND USE$ Muffler Ship t
Bast of Sub,Jectw+ prorty: (City of Westminster:)
��. ..ter .� ■ �..�p�e..■rw
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION.r
ZONE:
LAND USE: Retail shopping center
presently under construction
South of SuWect Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial
ZONE : C4 ( Highway Commercial District )
LAND USE: Retail
Went of Subject Property :
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial
SOME: C4 (Highway Commercial )
LAND USE: Vacant (portion of recently approved
motel site )
4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is exempt Class 2 Section 15302 from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
5 .0 COASTAL STATUS:
Mt applicable .
�satt Neport - S/5/Si �� tSi1Sd)
6,0, R EDtVRLOPMENT STATUS:
The proposed project is located within the beach Boulevard
Redevelopment Survey Area . The Redevelopment staff reeomends that
the proposed elevations for the project shall be reviewed and
approved by the D*nIgn Review Board and shall be compatible with the
recently approved motel on the adjacent site . Redevelopment staff
deferred analysis of the circulation plan to the City Engineer.
7 . 0 SpEciprc PLAN: • ,� ' : , , r a 1g
Not applicable . ! ,�• ��„� �,
8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: � fr �, 1 ; �•� ��� .
Not applicable .
9. 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS :
The original request for Use permit No . 86-6 was for the
construction of an approximately 2, 500 square foot drive-thru
restaurant . The proposed square footage of building for the
original request required the need to deviate from the parking and
landscape provisions in the Huntington Beach ordinance Code . -the#
revised plan dated July 28, lgdi, reflects a reduction of sgaa►te
footage of the buildin which his eliminated vaaiance coquests #1
and 12. i The revised plan indicates a parking space deficLenaoy of 2
' spaces which staff feels is a significant improverment over the
original plan. The following is a matrix which illustrates
compliance with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and the revised
plans which reflect the single variance request .
Revised
section Issue Required Plan Comment
` 9220 . 5 -Height 50 , 18 , Complies
with code
-Front setback 50 , 82' i
I -interior side setback 0 26 '
f -Exterior side setback 10► 66 '
-Rear setback 0 18 '
9603 -No . of parking spaces @ 2100 33* Rev•ised
1 space per 60 sq . ft . sq . ft . spaces plan ro-
of gross floor area 35 quires
plus variance
1 parking space per for re-
23 lineal foot of duction
drive-thru lane of 2
parking
space*
- Turning radius 27' 27 ' Com-
plies
with
code
Staff ltepor t - 4/5/86 -]- t gildd ►
1.
ISM-Usr d Revised
et oCome
�n.. R ui _P1.,.�._ ,. t.
9608 -Landscape 81 on 11• Compl,ies
Percentage site whth code
Landscape berm
Along street
frontage 10 , 10 , complies
with code
exterior side- 10 , 10 ,
yard
*Variance request on revised plan for a reduction of parking spaces
from 35 to 33
The revised plan submitted on July 28, 1986 , has eliminated the need
for a reduction in the minimum 27 foot turning radius and the
reduction of the 10 foot wide landscape berm along MacDonald street
(Variances I1 and 52 ) . The square footage of the building has been
reduced so that the request to allow a reduction of required parking
spaces from 42 to 34 has been reduced to a request to permit a
reduction of parking spaces from 35 to 33 parking spaces which it a
two space deficiency . The revised plan provides a much improved
Circulation plan which is the key element to any drive-thru restaurant
proposal .
Staff has rwiowed the revised plan and staff has drrterfimA that the
request to allow a two parking space raftction would be eliMmud it
the proposed driveway on Naebon+ald was eliminated and Converted to two
42) parkis9 spaCes. The owner of the property on which the motel will
be constructed has indicated to staff that he ie opposed to the shared
driveway . Staff recommends that the proposed shared driveway on
MacDonald Avenue be eliminated and replaced with parking stalls, and
utilise the reciprocal, access agreement with the adjacent property .
Staff recommends that the proposed curb-cut for the motel on MacDonald
Street be the only point of ingress and egress . This will alleviate
any potential traffic hazards and will place the ingress/egress on
MacDonald Street approximately 200 feet away from the intersection of
Beach Boulevard and MacDonald Street .
in ad+ii,tlea, the City Engineer and plaarn inq statt have anal ed tart
12lok at the staokiaq toe the drive-tbrm lane and w. Wr+r E
that kbe covAsed pl&a darted July 29, 1064, owlOo
st6i►ta space for dtive-thrd (Rime. ft* 1eefte r E� 0"
1oa41ng *t" toe f... suatt�e�Nhn.. tt.. tAe oCAW 6 4W
old 99"eft at d 04AUM a som aste"Mi to stooku
! , warr to Ni Ula to &*I
t"Uro the " 406 Elf l Atf
vim #hWstow silk n
�
71
b. IjjI
start wort - 6/50,46
0
41=WdiAt*1Y after the meeting with the City Engineer an Tuesday, JU1Y
291 1956, to discuss the plans submitted on July 24 1916, staff
contacted the applicant and informed his of our portion. Staff
409"sted . &- sooting in order to discuss our concerns , she applicant
has not contacted staff regarding a meeting on our concerns and in
order to accomodate the necessary stacking area of a minimum of seven
automobiles a significant modification to the site plan is necessary.
Consequently, staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the
Board of zoning Adjustment ' s denial of Use permit No. 66-6 and
Conditional exception No. 86- 3.
10. 0 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend* that the planning Commission uphold the Hoard of
Zoning Adjustment 's denial of Use Permit No . 86-6 and Conditional
exception No. 86-3 based on the following findings:
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 86-6 :
1 . The establishment , maintenance and operation of the proposed
2, 100 square foot drive-thru restaurant will be detrimental to:
a . The general welfare of persons residing or working in the
vicinity because of potential ingress, egress , and stacking
at proposed driveways on MacDonald Avenue and Beach Boulevard;
b . property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or
building because the proposed project will not be compatible
with surrounding structures .
2. The granting of Use Permit No. 86-6 will adversely affect the
General plan of the City of Huntington Beach .
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL OP CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-3s
1 . Because of the size , configuration, shape and lack of unique
topographic features of the subject property, there does not
appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved
that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the
sane district .
2. Since the subject property can be fully developed within the
required setbacks , such a conditional exception is not necessary
for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights .
3. The proposed on-site parking and circulation plan is inadequate
and have the potential of creating a congestion and circulation
hazard at the proposed shaved driveway located on MacDonald
Avenue.
1 . ingress and egress to the site at the shared driveway lc)cated an
MacDonald Avenue has the potential of Creating additiopal traffic
is�paCts .
staff R"Wrt - 8/9/16 •9- tSS1W►
S. potential stacking onto Reach boulevard has 447P$%
tial of
creating a major traffic hamacd. �� I
11 .0 WATIVN ACTION: �m N*mwmmmmwdw. tow 1(4 4%, 1
Staff cecosmnds a cone+nuance in order to work with the applicant and
produce a plan which ft. wplfes with the Nuntington peach OcdiAaAce Code
and address the concerns regardin5 potential stacking onto Reach
Boulevard,
ATTTRCKHRMTS:
1 . Ar" Map 1
2. Site plan, elevations, floor plans dared July 28, 1986 .
3. Staff report dated 7/3 5/86
JWP:RG :kla 1
LOA
Start et - •/'rl�i -�- t�+��wi
1 • .
W Aikk
Aff
�! PlaRninq t��i�tsian
FMI Devel nt services �
ba"S July ls, 1966
4�tt�TI APPUL TO TUN BOARD Of SON116 AW08IMSST'6 DSMM Of
083 PUNIT NO. 86-6/CONDITIONAL EMPTION MO. 88-2
t poodmakerl, Inc. VATS Aces :
9060 Talstar Avenue June 17# 1996
Suits 121
11 Nonte, CA 91731 D►ATC61Y t
A"Ust 171, 1750
T: Appeal to 9SAIn denial of
the construction of an zoos: C4 { Niq hwery
approximately 2j, 500 sq.ft. 'w:rercial Discrict )
driveathru restaurant
and a request to r*duct CaNSRAL PLAN: General
the min. 27 f t. turning • ssssrr a
radius, min. 10 f t. wide
landscape planter width, EXISTING USX: An existing
and the required number sq. ."`hack-in-the-Sort
of parking spaces. drive-thru restaurant
I&CATION: 16311 Beach Blvd. (north AC.KSAGs: . 92 acres
vtat corner of Beach
Blvd and MacDonald
street )
1 . 0 SOGGE$TBD ACTIUM:
Continue the Appeal to the Hoard of Zoning Adjustments denial of
Use Permit No. 66-6/Conditional Exception No. 86- 3, with applicant 's
concurrence, to the August S, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting .
f '
fJWP:!M:RLr:pb
t Glad )
.� d0 is
,fr
AID
k
M1
r
r,.
=Ff
=MAEAdLmht
P"
To: Planning Commissioo
F Mt Development services
�ATBt duly 1 , 1996
SOWIRM APPEAL `410 TUB BOARD OF ZONING AW08THAW'S MIAL OR
V28 PERMIT 90. WVCONDITION" MNCM! 100 Mo 88-3
uardlat Foodmaker, Inc. DATN 0%
9060 Telstar Avenue one
Suite 121
21 Monte, CA 91731 NUDATORY MWW1 RMS
u
T: 1l-peal to BMA' s denial of
the construction of an � C6 (iighway
approximately 2,500 sq. ft . tcial District )
drive-thru restaurant
and a request to reduce 4,11NUALMt ONwral
the min . 27 ft . turning Commercial
radius, min. 10 ft . wide
landscape planter width, iXISTING 951: An e=iitiA9
and the required number M sq. t. dank-in-the-pox
of parking spaces, drive-thru restaurant
LOCATION: 16311 Beach Blvd. {north ACR" E: . 52 acres
west corner of beach
Blvd. and MacDonald
Street
1 .0 SUGGBSTSD ACTION:
Continue, at the applicant ' s requests the Appeal to the Board of
Zoning Adjustment 's ment 's denial of Use permit No. 86-6/Conditional
exception No. 86-3.
2 .0 GISNERAL INrOXHATION:
0n may 21 , 19661, the board of Zoning Adjustments denied Use Permit
No. 96-0/Conditional Exception No. 86-3 by a vote of 5-0. The
number cf variance requests represented too great a departure from
the provisions in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Oods. staff
Indicated that the roposed square footage for the building needed
to bee *educed in or er to meet the provisione of the code.
z
:ss
d.
Beast !as C"aeiter a Cant l auanor in o9det to +Iwi M M w
dew *lieinatoi mM! 09 the rrsci#nco free!* NW OW to
NOW,t a me ter ei reu),at ion Md porkial 9400& +�M�Mt
UM jCSS Lire �comatly "Wov r 1 qCe 0 ' �'
mwwreint to tyre eub sect site. The Cocci nor site IFISS will low
t reetywooal amass . Also, staft it wocklnq with tM ""loot
to more aerier►ing acchitettucal eaMetibility ritb UN ee0ntlI
Srewed motel.
Cwatinai at the appliaant 'a C*gUGst, the Alai to the Ord of
"nine/ 74iestmat 's denial of use Wait No* ti-d/C"ditlemal
ekae tsar ft. 14•3, to the duly 15, 1944 llawwiaf remmlaiiM OWtiftg.
i
1►'1'�#��NrM��
11tar Crap
3. 1 lettec Eros applicant
3. IN natas tcoo doacd of Zoning Adjustneats dated May 31, 19*6
C utter fcon applicant r"aWing contiauance
�: 1a
a
i
d
I
`4
. n
• tip -
.` s
I r As
C2 % C2
C2 C2
_.._
• _,. �_ CZ
R R3
Y! mt -
�� CF-E t R3
I
R2
MI AA
tr M j ♦ C 4 !
• ,� C2
MI
HUNTi OWN MACH l��ii O 01111s101�!
T
ter, ��Cl
K
a ^L
%MOO
l
ISM 1
Now
May 39, 1614 Mw 3 o
City of Huntington Reach
!tanning Departswrnt
P.0. sax 190
Huntfnrton Reach!, CA 02641
RI: Conditional Exception No. 84-3
1740
fiat Sir:
w4, rrapeetf►ully n quent to Appeal that denial of the subject pit by
' thr. 11cord of Z(minR anA Ajuatmenta. we s►iil comsat tM Planting
idefr ter deloraoinn the nomprMry pmeedtirer and aerlieet data to be
h4mrd by the rlanninK Comm1pnim. ..�
l3incrtrly ,
bMAXER, INC.
hn A. Eraanuelli
egkn Construction Manager
ACX IN THR BOX Diviskm
AR:bjs
4
S•
�r)1 KZ7i.
rw
�od�OMIF I. Is board Of 38n121 AdjuetDGIRts
�p it �!!�
ibis r"fit to covered by e4ke"C ical Lte144iodr
"Uterais Mnvicses"tal Quality Act, 19840
We ►t"klin reported plannin and public !tart vca hsd
reviews tb• as and recommen that Pr at aY AMieeelen
rbads to MublicCorks standards.
Les None stagd the property owne a "M dovelolitq UW Parcel • W
theca ci11 be Other requirement ch as iastallatian of poblis
tceit li hts all well ptot a equipment etc. Ile. 1►ana
octhet stated the Untat iv reel Map coup be approved but not
• tb* Naivete Glen Codfr• sttd Continuing the t s"t until
after PiaaninI Comiss act ON on the proposed deO�opMnt .
M11 WHOM ST PO MOND MT SNITM, '9MATIVM PAWIL NAP
C M0e 84-197 VU INVID, AT TUB APPLICAM's IUMMI !s 20 tMM no!20fi
Of J d11s O t 1 . IT ZMt FOLLM 1!Q VMS
ATIZI rvans, Codfray, pot, Smith
won Mane
A ?: uo►ne
Alp, RRo jet
COWDITIONAL I Mp ION NO. 84-1
V/M PMRAI T NO. ii-5
Amlialal FgWWArg Inc,,
go U21 ST: To pornit a reduction of turning radius, landscape
planter es• than ton feet ( 101 ) , and the number of required packiaq
spaces proposed for a 2,500 Square root Jack in the tar restaurant.
UP R ST : To demolish eaistinq Jack in the Sot restaurant and
re u Na approximate 2# 500 square Foot buildings
subject property is located at 16111 Beach Boulevard (Northwest
cornet of Beach Boulevard and NeDona 1 d Street) .
These requests, army covered by Categorical BKesptiono Class It
California 8nviro6m*ntal QualitY Act, 1984s
staff stated the r"uost is to demolish an existing teat toed
o,rtablishmeat and rebuild it . The applicant proposes obtalRial as
adiale"t lot and expordin9 the balldiagi however, start Rows the
spplicant to attem"Isiq to overbuild the site. Staff ego-- rA�t
denial of both the Camditiawl Msetp ion amd fte Votalt r too
Glen Oodtr M*64 about the prosial ty se cresi�tial Mite +Ind
!r espl�irM there Were w�relal chiN � tM "am Vtl1r
rrtaeet bel1�1" tied• fifty t�+ ! bM caw. 1�;
Y
a"%"* •* board at boning Adjustments
may l • 1"d
Tbs Mile Beget" was opdald by Cheir"m To Pee and tm
yells stated his aomemy had se f ed be tCst4 4! 1 mo
rsto"ts a roaimatelY o►ne c previously relative to this,
pY �, Ord Mard had adv aed ae"i r ial dmit iooal ad jamat
ff. The i r �pany to�r�ntat ivN have, 401 to Mrs
1 , obtained a tents ivo agreement to meiolet E property to
th+r as at to rt ovaet in o cba a 1 !
a rt b l+tpcaeat ive stated theT ,Not �� Oise et
tl bsi ldial because it vould Not be oaenmical lr foasiblo. "
Another mosommy representative, coward Math, roitecatod tbeic
Olects to satiety the City's roquitemots, sec l "ith
ro-eoph'aoisod staff s stateiment that the bu i ldable parcel could mot
mmeammlati as large a project as the applicant •imbed to build# and
tmt tbo ftard had not oncourrayed such expansions, ftctberr
di asp was conducted about the applidant•s po♦sibllitles roc
this loset ion.
Tbege was no one else present wishing to speak for at "Minot the
pcoiect uo the public hearing was closed .
OWN WrrtON BY bNITU AND SRCOND BY EVANS# CONOtTION" 230PTION
90. di-1 WD 083 PRANIT NO. If-$ M MR DXNZ3D WfTM 212 FOLSANIM
f tlltii •, M FOL LOCI NG VOTb:
OEM ZZ REIM - CO RIITIOU 1301210 00. 21 :
it The lack of required parking spaces, proposed reduction is
minioal turning radius, and proposed reduction in winimun
landscape planter width will be detrimental to:
I a. The general welfare of persona residing or working in that
vicinity$
1
b. ttoperty and improvements i:i the vicinity of such use of
building.
2. because there Oro no of special circumstances applicable to the
Subject property, including fine, shape, topagcapb loestioo
of surroundings, the ,,tenet appliestiom of "m taur�,r~g Osdimomw
will not d rc ivo the •u b jeft roperty of ptivil m od�other spogties is the violay mW OWISC I*"t OU �N
� oi�siorli�a.
1. the "anise of a amaditiemal oxceptton to "a �r
asdor No psaaer" !be 40jor rlt at 4" of *Ore ,":
11��Rea, �. s. sward of ioili� Ad�+�taBnt•
i
I
ghe It"tin of conditional ssce tion No. 16-3 will Ifs
NOtefiall of
to the public welfs:er or iniasiMG to
Pcaporty In the eases ton• classifications.
s� s14 satins of the conditional *xce Lou will aftemly affect
the Umetal Plan of the City of Nuat�gtoa leach.
o Uh - asP T No. If.ts
1 . she oatabliabomt , maintenance and operation of the proposed
t,SOd "Mari foot building will be detrieoatnl tot
a . Iaielnyidl Yelfare of persons residing or working to the
f
b. Property and improve"nui in the vicinity of a** wN or
building*
2e she granting of the am* permit will adversely aftect the
r General Plan of the City of ■untington Beath,
i* she proposal is not consistent with the City's General Plan of
Land One.
6. she granting of use Permit No. 66--6 will be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property to
the sates cone classitications.
AYN• : Vans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe. smith
NOINS None
A"NNE: Noss
P Ni? NO* 86-27
VR CfJ► ►staN 00. 44w29
Iming veld nt colony
A r Nest t rmit construction of a OF640 Square poet Commercial
boil ding to bar at as the Southeast corwer of Namiltao Awefte
aM iusbacd dt r
This coque et to *over Negative "clscation we 46-"0
staff cfported the coge"t i ee Ometcetrties at a retiell 66116109
eo a vaesat site ehie b is adi to a 07 - 191evim 0
ofttec, OW the applicant Me wee witb Bey ftat
Gt~ to +Pith t" r stipolatidws. ate •to d w,
Brswr to now r 4aft" but si t
/�`�� iMrrsit ��tlrr►ti� +i�tsa► r � �
`d,` g
...,, _ ., ..ice.,• .. V,i _:.... a. ,.......
r
I r
FOODM%S. W 9M Ulrilor Iw+e %a &M 121, EI Mor4o. COMMW903i(Sit 01-MOY
"S low
i
i
IN* JUN 2
City of Huntington ttench FA ft{ 1
Monninor Mpartment ,
P.O. Box M
Huntington Reach, CA 91648
RS.- Conditional 8xceptitm No. 06-1
use Permit No. 16-6
dear �b
Due to the recent approve) of C.V.P. 416-24, the property to the
North and Vert of us, we would like to have our p."vet twtitnaed=
to allow us sufficient time to inoorporste the aftvaa adreavvent.
At that ton► a we will address concernst our re rdln treatomt of
y � �
lnndmeapinP. 1 would like to have the colors prgWed by tht
develkq wwo t adjacent to us in order to tteterw4ne whether "Wy WM be
rompoftle with ourp.
Tenor cooperation In this matter will be grfolly appreciated.
Slnverely,
CIMAKRR, INC,,��
Cie
A. R"nuel"
Canatruetion Manager
SA i10 TRI IBO7C ttitl
JAN:ble
" L#
.. d':4 y�r4.vf .�R, ;,_. .,, . ,. _ __..�.... •.e�:,'�,L, .,.s.ei. ._,.,... ._... _,._ter
KJODMAi . NNC 9M Telstar AyemA. Suite l21. Ei k4onoe. Cd+fcmoa 9l731 (818) 571-7667
August e, ]9Ad
City of Huntington Beach
Planning Department '
P,a. Box 190
Huntington Peach, CA 92648
RE: Conditional Exception No. 86-3 �
Use Permit No. 86-6 UM 1; its
;
Gentlemen: '� ►'-
We wish to appeal the Planning Commission's decision of August 5th to
the City Council for the following reasons:
A . The Planning Commlesion and staff have bomed the.r decision on
the traffic engineer's opinion which heK no basis of fact
i
1 B . City Ordint+nce No. 2828, effective 5/21/86 does not mandate a 13
car stacking lane.
` C. With the reciprocc+l parking agreement imposed on the adjacent
I proposed hotel property , we meet all City cadets.
j D. Rebuttal of questions oskecl to staff was not permitted, and
thr.refore the Commission's understanding was not clear.
F. her. Pattel, the Developer of the hotel. would prefer that we
have our own driveway on hlacDonald. The removal of this drive
will ndverRely impart the driveway on Peach Blvd.
F. A statement woo; made by a Commissioner that sh the remodels
mode by Jack in the Box have incorporated monument signs.
This statement is false. We have recently completed r dele in
Yong Beach, Inglewood, and Sunset Beach where our existing
pylon signs remained; and we have permits for our restaurant an
Peach @ Bishop scheduled to start remodeling approxhl ostely
8125. ai
a
f
;,MCI„
cft of oft afteft
S 40 MM
cJc
tl
i
I
G. Other drive-thru frefUtles an ftsah Blvd. ire en*yfag the an
of their land under dadlar charectorlstin proposed by ear
developmnt whkh we are being dordedo such as Carl's Jr. an
Beach Blvd. d Yorktown-, Taco Bill on Beach Blvd. 4 OrrfiM
f MaDnsld's on Beach Blvd. B ltubidaux; and Burner Ming an
f Beieh Blvd. g MsaDmald.
! lit appreciate the opportunity fors W and wish to be scheduled Aar
your meetingto be hold September 15 1985.
Sincerely
'FOOD AK ER . 1NC �
f
Joh A. Emanuelli
Re on Conatruotion �!enager
f aA K iN THE BOX Division
JAE:bjs
i
r'n4
chy at "Uneweter Beach
!e
U. Other drive-thru fadlitles on Reach Blvd. or* enjoying the use
of their land under similar characterlatiea proposood by our
development which we are being denied, such as Carl's Jr. car
Beach Blvd. a Yorktown; Taco Bell on Beech Blvd. B Oartltld;
McDonald's on Beach Blvd. @ ituhidoux; and Burger King on
Beech Blvd. @ MacDonald
We appreciate the opportunity for appeal and wish to be scheduled fbr
your meeting to be held September 15 , 1986.
Sincerely ,
FOOp AMER . INC .
:oh A. Emanuel]]
Re on Construction MenARer
JA K IN THE BOX Division
J F:bjs
�l
r � , - .. �iV ,r '•" •it
�# plI1� C t '� �AL ilk SIT IatT
E> MOW NQ W3 "1
"TUX n SUM GIVO that the *A*91e$ten 5e0eh City trues WIU b*U • .
FAwA ke"1e4 la the Council dumber at tlwe varALest" Snxeb Ci VU
Center, 2W Maix Street, 16stiaetes beat, Ca 1for ia, an are date and
at the time indicated Wow to recol," awl coaaider the statoemta of aU
per~ ibe v1sh to be, beard relative to the applicatide described War.
un Mo: nday, Wtomber 150 1986
TIM: 7:30 P.N.
LffLIWION owl&: Use Permit No. 86-6 and Conditional Exception No. d-3 - Appeal
f
I
WUTIOR: 16311 Beach Boulevard - Northwest corner of Beach Boulevard and M&cDm&ld
Avenue.
PRE: An appeal by Foodmakers, Inc. , to the Planning Comeission's denial
of Use Permit No. 86-6 and Conditional Exception No. 86-3. The
request is to construct an approximately 2100 Squad foot drive-thru
restaurant which creates a two parking space induction in the required
• number of parking spaces as required by Article 960 of tM Muntir4ton
Beach Ordinance Code. The appeal is based on a number of item
regarding stacking of automobiles on Beach Boulevard, sign&"
and realignment of a driveway.
S!(i 1TAL STA'!'OS: The proposed project is exaept from time provisions Of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
ruitt A leval description and a copy of the proposal is on file in the
Development Services Depiroant.
ALL DlaMESTID IERSOGS are iavited to attend acid he&riaS and eaprsis
optaloas or submit evidewe for of aSsiast the application as ou%Li&W
above. All appliestloas$ athlbitap and deseriptioee of this proposal are
on file with the Office of the City Cluat, 2000 Maio Streets ■IFatladtom
mewls, Calitortita, for inspection, bi► the public.
EWDW= IRA= CITY i 1pICIL
it t lti�asa► M. IiasRw�rtY
city CIO&
(no �3oj
_
Tits
ftbusk -fik
* No M!
It
MM mi116 WMIL11111S 1I& g! I& !EMIT 10 W4 a ITIM
ExCE/TION �.�'�
WfIct is nun Giva that the Mretiytom lamb City Caron eiU b*14 o
pablta beasift is the Cowell giber at the Nuatingtos baoak Circa
Costae, Z000 Mois itroeto lratiestoa fib, Callforala, so the dote aad
at the tiers tadIcated balm to receive aad ca►sider the rtatawsts of ale
perems who w1mb to be heard relative to the application deseriborl below.
DM Matday, September 15, 19M
TIM: 7:30 p.M.
9MICCI M MWfi: Use Perini t No. 86-6 and Conditional Exception No. 86-3 - Appeal
Lt ATIONoM: 16311 Beach Boulevard - Northwest corner of leach Boulevard and MacDonald
Avenue.
lt�: An appeal by Foodmakers, Inc. , to the Planning Coswissian's denial
of Use Permit No. 86-6 and Conditional Exception No. 86-3. The
request is to construct an approximately 2100 square foot drive-thru
restaurant which creates-a two parking space r*duction in the required
number of parking spaces as required by Article 960 of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code. The appeal is based on a number of items
regarding stacking of automobiles on beach Boulevard, slgnage
and realignment of a driveway.
'AM: The proposed project is exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
an ma; A legal description and a copy of the proposal is on file in the
Development Services Department.
A:.L IC&ERISTEZ) PERSMS are lar►ited to attend said heariag and espress
opiaioss or robust evldeoce for or against the application as outlined
abave. All applieatiaaa, ashlbita, and descriptioaa of thla proposal are
ee file with the Office of the C1t7 Clerk, 2000 Main Street, ftstlaatort
&each, Wifocula, for 1"pectioa by the public.
WNTINCS011 88ACM CtTT COM C I L
iy s Altcta No Vntwwtb
Gity clash
elicit t�t�) asp-sus
Wed: t 20, ��
i
•
Cliff lemma vWUC W"INC
M%A ?I" AIL
f�
Tat CM CLW OS O"ICB DATI:
► N: . W"3
` tt,iWi CIRDM A MLIC MAKING USING TNi ATTACM LEGAL MMICS Ift TV9
-� DRAT OF , !
O's are attached
s will follov
No A?'$
Initiated by:
Planning Coomission
Planning Department
Petition
i Appeal
i
other
Adoption of Invironswntal Status (x)
YES [--- ;No
Refer to P Planning Department + LxtensLan
for additional information.
I
+ if ap:plal, please transait exact wording to be required in this legal .
•
r
Publish
NUT ILE OF PUBLIC HEAR INGO
I40TICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council
of the City of Huntington Beach , in the Council Chamber of the Ciric Ginter,
Huntington Beach, at the hour of ' P.M. , or as soon thereafter as
00*
possible on �. Ise day of 1
for the purpose of considering 4% AltA
4
141110� All
A,
'OL t"A�?4Le �►
• 004*C 0"
� � � >F
All interested persons are invited to atte!id said hearing and express their
I!• Opinions. for or against said
I"urther inforntion rwy be obtained rcx�-te t fice of the City Clerk , 2000 Main
Street , Huntington Beach . L,31 ifornia. 92648 - (714) 536-5227
r VATCU CITY OF HOTINGTUN BLAC',
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
i
hR10169 seta to •,
13714 16 leas* der. , 1!i News" st./3rd tlator
06990000 CA 00701 Oarr riraoiras, CA $4105 .
• ti•F
�4�-0d�-11 2 1142-0l1�2i 13 ? 142-Od2-03 !� ,; r�
i a hr� i 0oar ' Mowed so stain preashak J. ' nmWeM
15 water •t. 7962 malt at. 7062 N0000 old at. �
!# L"t CA 92714 � Muntington Sch, CA 92647 suatingtan Solt, CA 92647
'
142-013-11 3 142-091-29 14 ' 142-092-03 24
d a a% s sons Nihsin K. fiadsh Dawn wasly & Demo
is Mauter Ott 2061 Glenview Ter, 1621 9"8109 1#100 .
UvLaeo CA 92714 Altadena, CA 21001 Santa AAA. CA 93705
142-083-19 4 142-091-30 15 142-093-04 25
ltoaqq Di Chan Chun Manuals. Cooia Murry U. Ursa3031 t. Nutuwad Ave. 22952 X. Tara Rd. 7960 Maccanald it.
Fullerton$ Ch 92631 11 Taro, CA 92630 auatington Bob, CA 92647 + .
142-013-20 5 142-091-31 16 142-093-06 24 '0 .
Yonne U. Kim Manual E. ComaP
James . heed
17522 �aah sl./9309 22952 al Toro PA. P.C. Sox 294
auatington Behr Ch 92647 21 Toro, CA 92630 Huntington Bch, CA 92441
142-•091-04 6 142-091-32 17 142-092-07 17
Rdwrrd C. Loh Mervyn st. Clara Alex Walker '
1112 Saywood Dr. 16271 Beach Blvd 20572 Pebble Lane '
Huntington Sch, CA 92646 Huntington Bch, CA 092647 Huntington Sch, CA 92646
142-091-05 7 142-091-33 is 142-092-01
Clays rrandtll Donald P. Jones Tashi D. sours•
25442 Wagon Wheel Circle 17931 Beach Blvd/49 7033 MacDonald at.
LAguna Mills, CA 02653 Huntington dch, CA 92647 Huntington ache CA 92647
p.
142-091-06 1 142-091-34 it 142-092-13 29
Thostas A. Msrdesich Marchese ara tics Inc. Chan C. Lai
7942.,Holt Avenue OW44 �ff, fit! 7726 Pinevals Or.
Huntington fth, CA 92647 c.. w, tl.. /o �+ Downey, CA $0240 Al"
142-001-09 9 142-091-35 20 142-092-14 30
Ditty Q. stone Richard T. Mu Wilber D. Snitb
4537 Agnes Ave. 7311 Stons Creek $312 20th it.
go. Hollywoodf CA 91604 Anahsiwe Cal 92007 westainater•e CA 92613
142-0:1-36 10 , 142-091-36 21 142-093-16 31
Des Long t 2buy sit Jame IN Wed Rt Al Durcoa P erctLes gyros
799 malt at. P.O. box 294 P Scat ,
Huntington Bahr CA 92647 Huntington Dche ' CA 92640 21saayme �x • , .
rtiassie n 33152 ,
142-d91-26 11 142-092-01 33 142-101-06 3d
tugstae Ja Duchans Goal Plog•csi stAyh� A. !1&A"1•
3482 Aq"ri" Dr, 795 McDc"Id Ott 1.a. Dos 6092
luatie�toA , CA 92649 NuOUagton Molt, CA 92447 rountals Valley, CA 92761 ��
'77 • . r T
V
8d"I Din•
4LO mom- At
I ,
oil+l� ��• 24 , A0 441-Od 1• �
Muses r• Cs t ' RDstiD toy 0amwel
17362 N aIaw Lam } 12i0i Rrwkborat/1101 '
POURgtA •obt CA 92647 Garden aravot Ch 92440
�i0-101�11 ' W 107-792-42 di
{ at Wilms CIDr ./Broportr T"
t-
ots Oi �L as Rt. !.0i Bea 7i00
01mm, CA 93649 i08 An9*166, CA 90054
142-101"10 26 107-712-03 47
Rw =. LU0090 second OBla Properties y
1121 try Cirele Mi • 111&ir
Rnntil�gton Bcbt CA 12636 121 nt& farwal'i's CA 1310•
•�
1d2-102-15 37 107-782-05 90
Po r** U. Trickett Norbert albrrs
1872 Now Baapshire Dr. 16242 Beach Blvd.
Costa sat CIA 02626 Huntington Rohe CA 92647
' 1d2�102•it 38 107-712-06 49 <<
0 fti,ldinq tatorprioes Norbert Cibars
7246 Water Av/M 16242 Beach Blvd,
Sntington Bch, CA 92647 Huntington Debt CA . 92647
162-102-1! 39 162-091-19 so
Jaamm Nusanae Jordan laadeakar, YAc.
9io1 Owland It, 9060 7elstar Ave/1121
1aatinat4n Bahl CA $2666 al Manta, CA 01731
142-102`•20 +0 ,
J"mw W sanne Jordan +,
!r•
16401 llwland $t.
Rontin9ten Bate, CA 92646 ;
1dT-102�•S= � 41 -
N * iui ldinq j'n torrppr i eaa � �� ,
7266 Water Aw/9w ,
amunston Bebt G 03647
ld2•l0=`s2 43
$922 Chwrab Ciirloa
mmUmst A Bab, CA 92649
10'!•22iiii 43
maw :. ftek
f
o.
p_
1
bU 'soteow 49 ■"S
IL M-
I , LANIT NO -6 AM
MITIWA
NOTICR IS bier ozyn that the lluatingtoei rwch City Cawascil Will hold a
public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington bomb Ci VIc
Catttec, 2000 N:ria street, Nuatington •each. California, as the date aad
at the ties indicatod below to receive and consider the statements of •11
per"" who wish to be heard relative to the application described below.
ant Monday* September 15, 1986
TIM: 7:30 P.R.
AFFUC►TIClr X=U; Use Permit No. 86-6 and Conditional Exception No. 86-3 - Appeal
LOCATION: 16311 Beach Bou' vard - Northwest corner of Beach Boulevard and MacDonald
Avenue.
MOPOUL: An appeal by Foodmakers , Inc. , to the Planning Commission's denial
of Use Permit No. 86-6 and Conditional Exception No. 86-3. 1he
request is to construct an approximately 2100 square foot drive-thru
restaurant which creates a two parking space reduction in the required
number of parking spaces as required by Article 960 of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code. The appeal is based on a number of items
regarding stacking of automobiles on Beach Boulevard, signage
and realignment of a driveway.
lIt4I2olAMUL STAM: The proposed project is exempt from the provisions of
the California Enviromeotal Quality Act.
aN rim. A legal description and a copy of the proposal is on file in the
Development Services Department.
ALL WMESTEb PER5065 are invited to attend said hearing and express
opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined
above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are
on file with the Office of the City Clark, 2000 Main Street, Huntington
S"ch, California, for inspection by the public.
HMDKTW BEACH CITY COUNCIL
by: Alicia N. Mentworth
City Clerk
Ph" (714) 336- 5405
Da tad: hugest 20.. 198b ,