Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Permit 90-69-appeal to Zoning Administrators approval CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK January 25, 1991 Irmin Langton 10256 Garfield Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Dear Mr. Langton, The City Council on January 22, 1991 denied your appeal relative to Use Permit 90-69. A copy of the minutes will be forwarded to you in approximately 10 days. Please call this office, if we may be of assistance. Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:bt (Telephone:71 4-536-5227) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ' 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK January 25, 1991 Charles Parsons 10252 Garfield Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Dear Mr. Parsons, The City Council at its January 22, 1991 meeting, denied the appeal filed on Use Permit 90-69. The City Council approved the staff recommendation. A copy of the minutes will be sent to you in approximately 10 days. Please call if this office can be of assistance. Connie Brockway City Clerk CB:bt (Telephone:714-536-5227) J Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, California, Number A-6214, September 29, 1961, and A-24831 June 11, 1963 ` STATE OF CALIFORNIA C County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and -a PUBLIC NOTICE �I resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the NOTICE OF age of eighteen years, and not a party to or PUBLIC HEARING' APPEAL OF THE interested in the below entitled matter. I am a ;:.ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S; principal cleric of the ORANGE COAST DAILY PERM TAL of USES •PERMIT NO;90+69r; , PILOT, a newspaper of general circulation, (Arequestto' Permit the;s-, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, relocatlon of an - exisprib.house, County of Orange, State of California and that from esaz Garn + I Ave.to 10241., attached Notice is a true and com lete co as r6sent Orive- p py - ' presently known was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, ae oE- cerfleral P P :-vNOTICE IS �;HERErBY Newport Beach, g GIVEN that the Huntington Huntington Beach, Fountain Beach City Council will hold a public hearing In the Coun- Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and cil:-chamber at the Hunt- ington Beach Civic Center, Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper to wit 2000 Maln steer,Huntington: the issue(s) Of: Beach,:-California,- on -the date and at the time,pn- dicatedpelowto receive and consider the'statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to;the appll cation described;below.; '. January 11, 1991 DATE/TIME: :Tugsday, January 22,1991,7 00 PM APPLICATION-NUMBER; APPEAL OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR,V AP-. 'PROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO.90-69 APPLICANT Charles _Parsons, APPELLANT: Irm`in Langton LOCATION: 10241 Kaimu Drive (Presently known as 10252_.Garfield Ave"- ZONE:.R1-FP? - REQUEST: To.permit[the relocation of a house pies-1 ently at 9542 Garfield AL= enue to 10241 Kaimu_ Drivel (Presently.kno,4 as 16252' Garfield Ave.),-`c ' I ENVIRONMENTAL' STATUS: Categorically.ex- empt pursuant.to Section; 15303, Class 3 of the Call - I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the fornia Environmental n allty! Act.. foregoing Is true and correct. COASTAL STATUS::Notl applicable. ' ON FILE- A copy of the' January 11, 1 proposed request,is on file in] Executed on gg the City Clerks"Office 2066 Main"Street; `Huntingtdrn{ at Costa Mesa, California. Beach,California 92648,for, inspection by the public,A. copy of the staff report villl! be available to interested: parties at City-Hall or the Main City Library. (7111 Signature Talbert Avenue)after Janu- ary 18, 1991. . G - ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are invited to attend, said hearing and express, opinions or submit evidence; for or against the application as outlined above. If there( are--any further questions' PROOF OF PUBLICATION 'lease callnest nn-5271. sistan4 Planner at 5iy, City \ , Connie Brockway, C(ty Clerk, City of Huntington; Beach `Published Orange Coast( Daily Pilot January 11, 1991 F041 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION f January 22, 1991 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administra �� Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Developme At Subject: APPEAL OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 90-69 / / -.7.t-9/ - 4zv LConsistent with Council Policy? [v Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Irmin Langton protesting the Zoning Administrator ' s approval of a house relocation. On December 19 , 1990 , the Zoning Administrator approved the applicant ' s request to relocate a house from 9542 Garfield Avenue to the southerly half of 10252 Garfield Avenue. On December 27, 1990, the City Clerk received a letter appealing this permit under Section 17 .28 . 080 of the Municipal Code as it relates to building relocations . A copy of the appeal letter is attached. Appeal Process Note: Typically any appeal of a Use Permit would first go to the Planning Commission prior to being reviewed by the City Council under Section 9815 .4 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. In this instance, however, Section 17 .28 . 080 of the Municipal Code also applies which states that an appeal of a relocation permit must be filed with the City Clerk and heard by the City Council . In order to expedite the appeal process it has been determined that the provisions of the Municipal Code would be more efficient . RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Administrator ' s Recommendation Motion to: "Approve Use Permit No . 90-69 with Findings and Conditions of Approval as recommended by staff" . Staff Recommendation Motion to : "Approve Use Permit No . 90-69 based on findings and conditions outlined in Attachment L. " PI O 5/85 ANALYSIS• History On June 19 , 1990, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-368, Conditional Exception NO. 89-46 and Environmental Assessment No. 90-12 which was a request to subdivide one 11, 745 square foot parcel into two parcels - one 6, 000 square foot parcel (parcel 1) and one 5, 745 square foot parcel with easements (parcel 2) . Conditional Exception No. 90-46 was a request to permit a lot with less than 6, 000 net square feet. After subtracting the easements from the lot size the net lot for parcel 2 is approximately 4 , 091 square feet . The appellant submitted a letter to the Planning Commission objecting to the subdivision. After the approval by the Planning was granted no appeals were received. Provided the final map is recorded with the County before June of 1992, the subdivision will be completed and the applicant would be entitled to place two homes on his property; one on each parcel . A copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report is included as Attachment No. 3 . The applicant intends to reposition the existing house onto parcel 1 and relocate another house onto parcel 2 . The relocation of the house onto parcel 2 is the only issue covered by the appeal o.f. Use Permit No . 90-69 . Code Requirements Section 9811. 5 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code requires that a use permit to the Zoning Administrator be processed whenever a person wishes to relocate an existing house into a different neighborhood. The code provides the following criteria to analyze the request : (a) The age of the building, as compared to age of other buildings in the neighborhood. (b) The architectural design of the building, as compared to other buildings in the neighborhood and its effect upon same. (c) The size of said structure in comparison to other structures in the neighborhood. Staff Analysis (a) Age of building: The existing residence at 9542 Garfield was constructed in 1953 . The adjacent tracts were all developed during the mid 1960 ' s . The existing house which will be repositioned onto parcel 1 was constructed in 1950 . Although the relocated house would be approximately ten to fifteen years older than the majority of homes in the neighborhood, it would not be the oldest in the neighborhood. Staff does not feel that this is a significant difference in age. RCA 1/22/91 -2- (8243d) (b) Architectural Design Architecturally the neighborhood is typified by one story single family dwellings with a variety of roof styles and window treatments . The exterior finishes are usually stucco with accents of wood siding or brick veneer. The subject house is a single story stucco house with a pitched roof . The applicant proposes to change the garage roof to a hipped roof to blend better with the neighborhood; particularly the house directly to the south. In addition, the applicant proposes to entirely restucco the house and add french doors and upgraded windows on all exterior openings as well as significantly remodel the interior of the house. With these changes as conditions of approval, staff feels that the house would blend in well to the existing neighborhood. (c) Size of Structure With the remodeling of the structure, the house would have approximately 1, 020 square feet of living area with a 390 square foot garage. The existing house as well as the two houses that are directly to the east have approximately 1,295 square feet of living area . Houses in Tract No . 5025 which lies to the south and east of the subject property range from 1, 111 to 1,227 square feet of living area while houses in Tract No. 4305 range from 896 square feet to 1 . 176 square feet of living area . Appeal In her appeal of the Use Permit No. 90-69 the appellant raises two primary concerns, staff has included a response after each of them: (1) Compound the negative effect on my property of the city' s approval to create a sub-minimum size lot by causing a further devaluation of my property. Response: The denial of Use Permit No. 90-69 would have no effect upon the Planning Commission' s approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 90-368 . The appeal period expired with no appeals filed, therefore, if the Use Permit were denied, the applicant would still be able to construct a new single family residence on parcel 2 provided the final map is recorded prior to June 1992 . With the extensive remodeling and upgrading of the structure, staff feels that the house relocation would have little or no effect on the value of properties in the area . I RCA 1/22/91 -3- (8243d) (2) Contradict the concept of neighborhood enhancement . Response: The Neighborhood Enhancement Program, of which this neighborhood is a part, is a federally funded program which assists property owners in upgrading their homes by providing low interest loans to low and moderate income families . This application would have no impact upon the Neighborhood Enhancement Program. FUNDING SOURCE: This project would be .financed through private resources by the applicant . ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny Use Permit No. 90-69 and recommend that the applicant construct a new house on parcel 2 . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Recommended findings and Conditions of Approval 2 . Appeal letter from Irmin Langton dated December 26, 1990 3 . Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 19 , 1990 4 . County Verification of the Age of the Structure. 5 . Site Plans, Floor Plans and Building Elevations dated November 14 , 1990 6 . Letter from Charles Parsons to City Council Members dated January 10, 1991 7 . Letter from Charles Parsons to Irmin Langton dated January 3, 1991. MTU:MA:MJC: lp RCA 1/22/91 -4- (8243d) RECOMMENDED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. The relocated house is of the appropriate age, architectural style, and size as the homes in the immediate neighborhood. b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. The relocated house is of the appropriate age, , architechtural style, and size as the homes in the immediate neighborhood. 2. The granting .of Use Permit No. 90-69 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. The general plan allows for single family residences . 3 . The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City' s General Plan and Land Use Map. The general plan allows for single family residences . SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 14, 1990 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2 The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in building height, floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check process . Building permits shall not be issued until the Zoning Administrator has reviewed and approved the proposed changes . The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature. 3 . "Should a Traffic Impact Fee be adopted by the City Council, the applicant/owner shall be responsible for paying such fee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and/or final building permit approval . " 4 . The house shall be completely restuccoed and new french doors and windows on all exterior openings prior to final inspection or occupancy. 5 . 'An accessway from Garfield Avenue shall be approved by the Fire Department and installed prior to final inspection or occupancy. 6 . Maximum separation between building wall and property line shall not exceed two inches (2") . 7. Driveways on Garfield Avenue shall be removed and replaced with sidewalks, curbs and gutters to the satisfaction of Public Works. 8 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 9 . Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. 10 . Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units . 11. Low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets . 12. Prior to issuance of building permits, the subject property shall enter into irrevocable reciprocal driveway and parking easement(s) between the subject site and adjacent. properties . A copy of the legal instrument shall -be approved by the City Attorney as -to form -and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office- of the County Recorder. A copy shall be filed with the Department of Community Development prior to occupancy. 13 . All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits . 14 . Per Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, Section 9960 .2(f) (6) , a 30-inch box tree shall be planted in the front yard of each lot and in the exterior side yard of each corner lot as provided in the Street Tree Standards adopted by the City of Huntington Beach. A 36-inch box tree may be substituted, if a 30-inch box tree is unobtainable. 15. Conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all working drawings submitted for plancheck. (8308d) Irmin Langton 10256 Garfield Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 City of Huntington Beach December 26, 1990 J Re: Use Permit No. 90-69 Charles Parsons I am appealing the decision of the Zoning Administrator, /y un Ginj_ SCE 0 /f,t3;� Placing an old house (anno 1953) on the property adjacent to mine will (a) compound the negative effect on my property of the city's approval to create a sub-minimum size lot by causing a further devaluation of my property (b) contradict the concept of neighborhood enhancement. c� Irmin Langton - GJ huntington beach' department of community development STAFF REDORIE TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: June 19 , 1990 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-368/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-46/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-12 (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 17, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT/ Charles Parsons DATE ACCEPTED: OWNER: 9392 Portsmouth Drive March 12, 1990 Hunt . Beach, CA 92646 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: REQUEST: Subdivide one 11, 745 sq. ft. Waived by applicant parcel into two parcels (6, 000 sq. ft. and 5, 745 ZONE: R1-FP2 (Low Density sq. ft . with easements) . Residential-Floodplain) Variance to minimum lot size. GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential LOCATION: South side of Garfield Avenue approximately 365 EXISTING USE: One single ft . west of Suva Lane family dwelling ACREAGE: 0 .39 gross acres 1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Negative Declaration No. 90-12, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-368 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-46 with findings and conditions of approval . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-368 is a request to subdivide one 11, 000 square foot parcel into two smaller parcels. Parcel 1 would be a standard 6, 000 square foot parcel which is proposed to take access from an easement across Parcel 2, a 5, 000 square foot parcel with easements resulting in a 4,091 square foot usable lot area (pursuant to Section 992 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code) . _ Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-46 has been initiated because the..proposal does not comply with the City' s minimum lot size requirement of 6,000 square feet . The applicant is requesting a net lot area of 4 , 091 square feet for Parcel 2 of the subdivision. sm � . A-F M-23C 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: - Subiect Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1-FP2 (Low Density Residential- Floodplain) LAND USE: Single family dwelling North of Subject Property: City of Fountain Valley (Single family dwellings) East, South and West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1-FP2 (Low Density Residential- Floodplain) LAND USE: Single family dwelling 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No . 90-12 for twenty-one (21) days, and one letter was received from the Environmental Board. The letter and response to comments are attached to this report . The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Tentative Parcal Map No. 89-368 or Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-46, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No . 90-12 . 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7. 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8 . 0_ SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: This project was originally submitted to the Planning Division in September of 1989 . In the original proposal, the applicant was requesting to retain the existing driveway access onto Garfield Avenue for Parcel 1 and no additional easement across Parcel 2 . Upon review of this proposal, the Public Works Department requested that vehicular access to Garfield Avenue be dedicated to the City. In response to this request the applicant revised his plans to show vehicular access for Parcel 1 being taken from an easement across Parcel 2, thereby further reducing the useable net lot area of Parcel 2 . Staff Report - 6/19/90 -2- (6082d) These revised plans resulted in additional variances to open space for both lots . These plans were submitted to the Planning Commission on April 20, 1990 , however, the applicant requested a continuance to further revise his plans . The plans have been revised to show a zero lot line concept along the north property line of Parcel 2, with direct vehicular access to Parcel 2 from the existing easement . With this concept, two driveway parking spaces have been added in addition to providing the minimum open space required on Parcel 2 . Only the variance to minimum lot size remains . Parcel 2, as proposed, is irregular in shape due to the required street dedication from Parcel Map 14-50 in 1968 . Furthermore, exceptional circumstances exist on the property due to the one existing and one required easement across the parcel totalling 1, 663 square feet . As an additional consideration, it is important to note that by approving this proposal, the applicant would be required to dedicate vehicular access rights on Garfield Avenue to the City. This would be a major benefit to traffic circulation along a primary arterial highway. On the basis that there are exceptional circumstances pertaining to the property (irregular shape and easements across the property) and considering that the City would benefit by approving the project through eliminating the single family residential driveway off of Garfield Avenue, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No . 90-12, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-368 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-46 with findings and conditions of approval . 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 90-12, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-368 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-46 with the following findings and conditions of approval : I FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 89-368 : 1 . The size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design features of the proposed subdivision for two single family dwellings are in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. Staff Report - 6/19/90 -3- (6082d) f . 2 . The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time that the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential ( 6 . 5 units per gross acre) and R1 (Low Density Residential) zoning were implemented. 3 . The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the proposed density of 6 . 5 units per gross acre. 4 . Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-368 for two R1 lots is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-46 : 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that do not apply generally to other property or uses in the district because the property is irregular in shape, and has easements reducing the useable lot area of Parcel 2 . Any alteration to the property requires an easement which further reduces the usable lot area . 2 . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-46 for reduced lot area will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or injurious to the conforming ( land, property, or improvements) in the neighborhood. i 3 . The conditional exception (variance) for reduced lot size is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City' s General Plan and Land Use Map designation of Low Density Residential . 4 . The granting of this conditional exception from Section 9110 .2 (A) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code will not defeat the general purposes or intent of the code which is to maintain consistent densities, light, ventilation and open space. 5 . The granting of the conditional exception (variance) for reduced lot area will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 6 . The applicant is willing and able to carry out the purposes for which the conditional exception (variance) is sought and he will proceed to do so without unnecessary delay. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 89-368 : 1. The tentative parcel map received and dated February 27, 1950, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modification: a . All vehicular access rights to Garfield Avenue shall be dedicated to the City. Staff Report - 6/19/90 -4- (6082d) b. The easterly 12 feet of Parcel 2 extending from the proposed property line adjoining Parcel 1 to the existing 20 foot wide easement on Parcel 2 shall be clearly marked and designated as an easement and shall be recorded as such with the County Recorder in the chain of title of both properties prior to issuance of building permits . 2 . Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical . shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers ; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities , water heaters, and central heating units; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots, water faucets and showers . b. If foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire .retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department and indicated on the floor plans . c. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s) . d. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials proposed. e. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer . This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities . f . The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 3 . Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a . Submit copy of the revised Tentative Parcel Map pursuant to Condition No . 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. Staff Report - 6/19/90 -5- (6082d) t b. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit) . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works . C . Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted for Public Works approval . d. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. e. The subject property shall enter into irrevocable reciprocal driveway easement(s) between the parcels on the subject site. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the Community Development Department and the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder . A copy shall be filed with the Department of Community Development . f . Final Parcel Map shall be accepted by the City Council, recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy filed with the Department of Community Development . g . Submit copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificate for each structure. 4 . The Public Works Department requirements are as follows : a . No access shall be taken from Garfield Avenue. Existing vehicular access to Garfield shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. b. The applicant shall remove all driveway aprons on Garfield Avenue and Kaimu Drive (existing but not used) and replace with sidewalk. The presently used driveway apron on Kaimu Drive shall remain and be used as access for both parcels . C . Separate sewer laterals and water services shall be provided. 5 . Fire Department Requirements are as follows : a . An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations if the total gross floor area (including garage) exceeds 5, 000 square feet . b. On-site fire hydrants shall be provided in number and at locations specified by the Fire Department . C. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards . Staff Report - 6/19/90 -6- (6082d) 6 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department . 7 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 8 . During construction, the applicant shall : a . Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; C . Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts) ; d . Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts . 9 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - . Saturday 7: 00 AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays .. 10 . Prior to final building permit approval the following shall be completed.: a . Final Parcel Map No. 89-368 shall be accepted by the City Council . It shall be recorded with the County Recorders Office and a. copy submitted to Planning Division prior to Certificate of Occupancy or final inspection of first .unit . b. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished. 11. Should a Traffic Impact Fee be adopted by the City Council, the applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying such fee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and/or final building permit approval . 12. The applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying the Park and Recreation Fees in effect at the time the final map is accepted by City Council or issuance by building permits, whichever occurs first . 13 . The developer will be responsible for the payment of any additional fees adopted in the "upcoming" Water Division Financial Master Plan. 14 . Landscape irrigation system shall be designed and constructed to include a separate water line for the use of reclaimed water subject to Water Department approval . Staff Report - 6/19/90 -7- (6082d) 15 . Relocation of the existing house onto Parcel 1 and construction of the house on Parcel 2 shall be subject to approval by the Planning Director . 11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may deny Negative Declaration No . 90-12 , Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-368 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89-46 with findings . ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-368 dated June 5, 1990 2 . Area map 3 . Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 17, 1990 4 . Narrative 5 . Negative Declaration No . 90-12 6 . Parcel Map 14-50 dated May 23, 1968 7 . Letter from the Environmental Board dated April 16, 1990 8 . Response to Comments HS:M • a Staff Report - 6/19/90 -8- (6082d) TENTA'. IE PARCEL MAP NQ-39-368 IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH .ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA, '1•C.a...(.:3•N�>'Cf\'.. .a�FC FL / .!S' •.!:Cw:•i i�.�'.J.N.IP �ca�oE.? •iJ.;C•/✓.?•+r:F 5..':%r v+.x c� •.,oS, sJ.:.x'O,t :RCcLS O. ; -C. lc s ✓uA/E 4, /990 fL �s •vt y � NOTES. _rt�r.�.vp?Pav95FJ�R•r,.v _ =o� � F Q� � ' ?aJP9 fEo. a„?E::�r otE S':'.SiE c•n,t•- ?c.,-•Jc - _ r xA J,? 'I` J n tom? j,; ��.�nJ SE w.iGE :�:i?JS.•i: '•''L'VC."t' _' ��' S.-,<<cry' ;?�.'ti Os��•�.:nG'.';•N a:a"'-,.�Ejc.'?_....c::_" // VICHNITY MAP N.T S C GARFIELD AVE. O c j IN � I ' p j°vino"'' +o. 5f6f _ PREPARED BY: r G�«6C - I EMEn'u_D EtiG'/N[E,7/N6• H I n PAQCfL ft ao0 c j mvIn am ST.,SCV04 � Z HUNr,.vGmN BfACN,C9-91GJG ———— 'll "'1 I :`7/cJ gdd-465/ . W n W IT S ^, JO,V,�G.O C BAKEQr 4-V 4-.S3 Ee I — scACF:/'-10' sauce i s• ' „ PREPARED FOR: J zE I FF rl CN.4Q(ES F 1"rPSON4l .-- -J�•0O 6<SY.C?dbr.0-4 V7bYAYP. -- �- t,'fgsFM,Rvr . .~ '. FaR R?/wrF OTNt'NAY • ' i =+, NOu SG � � ErrSs Q�N LEGEND: ` GY YNt w4Y .4PbobSEO Md«SE • � — MEN tY.WSrq(Mr1pN r , 77'DG L_ J 4EWJ//a7WEC aw AfAk-&L _ErYST HOUSE e04, w Afret 7�G`A L.V 01V A44fK t GARFIEL0 AVE. L I CITY ' i WIN TINGI ON BE AC 8 RI-FP2 RI FP2 N J KAINU DR.= SAMOA DR w I-FP2 RI-FP2 RI-FP2 6'ui 1- ANIIf AI Dfl. i F, OR. C4-FP2 : R I- LN' R I-FP2 T•N• RI-FP2 PUA DR. ,2 sa ii To c._J 8 R I-FP2"-" - R I-FP2 :r" R I-FP2 > m / �—-- _ RI-FP2 — ----- Jl R-A-FP2 41 R-A-FP2 vPz $ R I-FP2 ' KAMOELA DR. R I-FP2 RI-FP2 Nal.awn DR. � suAo.• � i R I-FP2 N N RI-FP2 MH-FP a a a I- IL COON CA N N N i 0. (L CF-E-FP2 a ti = _ RI`FP2 ; l9 '� C. .3 .^•.... .l IL :r.,0 v.co a Q a ¢ � Q ¢ RI-FP2 � CNRI$TM45 _ c_� R 1-FP2 { uwi TORNTONN RI-FP2 RI-FP2 e ti r RR-AL O.'i = d MONITOR DR, Q •U LL RI-FP2 F R I-FP2 o- 2 VALLEY FORGE SHANGRi LA OR. Q r R I-FP2 N N a. AIENfl IMAC OR u / �- R I-FP2 Iz a CF-E-FP2 TPM89-368/CE89-46/ND90- 12 �- HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION 4 C huntington beach department of community development S-AFf REPORT to: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: April 17, 1990 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-368/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-46/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-12 APPLICANT/ Charles Parsons DATE ACCEPTED: OWNER: 9392 Portsmouth Drive March 21, 1990 Hunt . Beach, CA 92646 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: REOUEST: Subdivide one 11, 745 sq. ft . May 10, 1990 parcel into two parcels (6, 000 sq. ft . and 5 , 745 ZONE: Rl-FP2 (Low Density sq . ft . with easements) . Residential-Floodplain) Variance to minimum lot size . GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential LOCATION: South side of Garfield Avenue approximately 365 EXISTING USE: One single ft . west of Suva Lane family dwelling ACREAGE: 0 . 39 gross acres 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Negative Declaration No. 90-12 and Deny Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-368 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89-46 with findings . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: 0 Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-368 is a request to subdivide one 11, 000 square foot parcel into two smaller parcels . Parcel 1 would be a standard 6, 000 square foot parcel which is proposed to take access from an easement across Parcel 2, a 5, 000 square foot parcel with easements resulting in a 4 , 091 square foot usable lot area pursuant to Section 992 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-46 has been initiated because the proposal does not comply with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, Article 911 . Section 9110 .2(A) specifies that the minimum lot size shall be 6, 000 square feet . The applicant is requesting a net lot area of 4,091 square feet . v A-F M-23C yt"' 3_. 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1-FP2 (Low Density Residential- Floodplain) LAND USE : Single family dwelling North of Subject Property: City of Fountain Valley (Single family dwellings) East , South and west of Subiect Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1-FP2 (Low Density Residential- Floodplain) LAND USE : Single family dwelling 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No . 90-12 for twenty-one (21) days, and no comments , either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued . Prior to any action on Tentative Parcal Map No . 89-368 or Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89-46, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No . 90-12 . 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The subject property was originally subdivided from the two parcels directly to the east in 1968 . All three original parcels are remnant parcels which were not included in the subdivisions which were developed around them in the early 1960 ' s . .The three lots range in size from 8, 625 square feet to 11,745 square feet and each has a single family home. As a means of providing access to the adjacent properties other than from Garfield Avenue, a 20 foot wide easement was established across the southern end of the property. A copy of Parcel Map 14-50 is attached. This easement will remain. After subtracting this easement from the total lot area, the subject property (Parcel 1) is approximately 10, 804 square feet . At present, the property takes access from a driveway which accesses Staff Report - 4/17/ 90 -2- (5421d) directly onto Garfield Avenue . The Department of Public Works is requiring that this access be dedicated to the City and that all access be taken from the existing easement . As a result , an additional easement 12 feet wide by 59 feet long would be- required to provide access to Parcel 1 . This easement would run along the eastern edge of Parcel 2 . The resulting net lot area of Parcel 2 is approximately 4 , 091 square feet which is less than the 6 , 000 net square feet required by Section 9110-. 2 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . The property currently has one existing single family dwelling which is proposed to be repositioned onto Parcel 1 . One new dwelling is proposed to be constructed on Parcel 2 . Although the construction of the home on Parcel 2 is not part of this applicatiori, the map indicates the possible placement of the structure on the parcel . This p-lacement meets all minimum setback requirements; however, it also indicates that the proposal may not meet minimum open space requirements . Any deviation from the minimum open space requirements would need the. approval of a variance. If the Planning Commission wishes to approve the applicant ' s proposal , the map should be revised to show the home on Parcel 1 set back a. minimum twenty-five (25) feet from the north property line. The following is a zoning conformance matrix which compares the proposed project with that required by Code: Section Issue Required Proposed 9110 . 2(A) Min. Lot Size 6 , 000 sq. ft . 6, 000 sq. ft . (Parcel 1) 4, 091 sq. ft . * (Parcel 2) 9110 . 2(B) Min. Lot Frontage 60 ft . 85 ft. (Parcel 1) 45 ft . knuckle 59 . 8 ft . (Parcel 2) 9110 . 3 Max. Density 1 unit per lot 1 Unit per lot *Variance required In summary, the proposal is to create two lots of which one does riot meet the City' s minimum lot size requirement. If all three remnant parcels were consolidated, however, four legal lots could be obtained. Staff Report - 4/17/ 90 -3- (5421d) t 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No . 90-12 and Deny Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-368 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89-46 with the following findings . FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . Because. of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved. The site is generally flat and rectangular in shape . 2 . Since the tubject property can be fully developed within established setbacks , a conditional exception for reduced lot width is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights . 3 . Granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89-46 for reduced lot size would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. The subject property was legally subdivided and developed in a manner consistent with applicable zoning laws . 4 . Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same r zone classifications . 11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may approve Negative Declaration No. 90-12, Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-368 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89-46 with findings and conditions of approval . ATTACHMENTS : u 1 . Area map 2 . Narrative 3 . Negative Declaration No. 90-12 4 . Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-368 dated February 27, 1990 HS:MC: kla Staff Report - 4/17/ 90 -4- (5421d) TENTAI; rE PARCEL MAP N(- 89--368 IN THE Cif 7 OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ,ORANGE COUNT r.CALIFORNIA. +E'k.:.4 XUS-✓v/S/M/ �=R4 PC<< / .1S SHOW.,/ON A HnP E.oP_•�cO, .r'°L'K/•:,Ti;;F S:,^G Riorc< Mi—S..=�-��s P4RCrLS �/ ACRES sEorE/yBEP 7,IM? ` 1 5 �L S � � r _NOTES cox. s<p .i✓E h I / �r:Srr.+ap f':L'.=•,c.-0 zo...v .?r- =oP � � �j � �r Ensr P4O_•oi�•':LSL S/•,'iPCc��^,:: .^Ci:GE-n i_ t �f 4 Pva O?^ ,T - ... _. ,;..'P �. .^l SE....�.r._ ✓'S.�J S•i- .^-4 JtrC-/�,r•" r "�•�'''S.`_O.-��=fE[S'r„SC}AF1tS 0.114. rJ Fc•BG/� �} _yl4rl�_ S,�-c�.3:�.^.?V Carry O<nGx•RNC.^.•J D'�.-1��.7E:X1�.7_YE�'•:i lO1CTOw.v A/E 5 - +('� VICINITY MAP N.T.S vi GARFIELD AVE. Vl 2 Q O m c —(27°) Fro 9}9A/� 5 .:..• ..:- 5 r--— „,,.,>,,,_-�.�>q�... •_•.•• •- 1 PREPARED BY 1 °' .•'•:''TCur�`..",��j,�i�i, :6 � a- I Y E.yE.F>•1L0 ENGlNEE�P�uG' N _ 97.�"PL."'•I.i �C�;+��7,.�-- ul j /BGG1�Hof/N ST.,Sl'E./GO ° 2 NLNrwCroAl BEACH,CA 98:46 ti I• .'ntrr•✓G J I I , OONACD 6 BA.e'EA2,L S:G683 —50 S[•A<E /'-10' I 6A.rAGE I / i •� J-=- PREPARED FOR: 20 CwAQl ES F PAQSONS !iti 1 I :p ;'.1�N 9392 PaRTSMouTH 04 n•�d�- - ' lie — (7lRJ 9G3'49Bs III •.�,��,, i,,,,.f;� �` I CX. � 6A.u6E .n a S9 �*R Awl✓Alf p-llve.wv PaRwaE.0 �X. NouSt: PY/ST.P�A/ LEGEND: ex,OINe4rAY t) _f'1PI�PoSEO Ho�SE { t l E.riST. ti'auSE/6AA44GE 7U dG L_�J •PEfttt//MrvEC Nv Al.1'el- Mama _ewsr HaVSE d 64.EHSE ALrex 7'04t^A LN 'PEI 604 r/ON ON 1'-44CK/. ✓.Al JGO ex/Jr<ovTOvfJ C t v of 1-untington Beach Pl.annina: Department RE : Subdivision and Conditional Fxception Application SLJ 3MITTED '3Y : Charles F . Parsons The subject R-1 property in this application consists of n parcel that; is 11 , 720 sq . feet , just 280 square feet short of, Leine a double lot . The existingz 1300 sq , foot house is situated on the lot in such a way that much of the open space is wasted . As most owners bf.' large lots know, all that extra open space is just too much grass to mow . The unusual thing about the parcel is that it has frontage on two streets . My plan is to move the existing house in line with the setbacks of the other houses that front on Garfield , thereby creating two lots with adequate open space , frontage and setbacks on both lots . I would then construct a new home on -the lot that fronts on Tonga Lane consistent with the houses in that area. ' t The parcel was originally 12 , 750 sq , feet in size but in order to develop the surrounding tract in 1963, 1030 sq . feet was dedicated to the city in order to put the Tonga Lane - Kaimu Drive right "of way through the southwest corner of the parcel . Given the value of the land in 1989, I feel that dedication caused a hardship on the property for further development without , a variance . Also , if the owners of the property had foresight in fi963, surely they would have split the lot in two using the six contiguous lot averaging method as only a few of the lots in the .y tract are between the 5, 000 to 6 , 000 sq . feet minimum r'kquirement . The surrounding area constitutes an entry level residential neighbourhood with many two bedroom homes that are under 1 , 000 sq . feet . Given that fact , the only sensible way to ' 2 malce any improvements to the property would be 'to add the new horse , as adding on to the existing home would be overbuilding for the neighbourhood . I feel that the neighboirl ood would. benefit f'roTn a house that faced theirs , rather than the present condition i-!here the nel.ghbours get to loolc into my backyard , which looks strange at best . The surrounding area is almost completely developed so this addition would have little ef'f'ect on water, sewage , traffic , and. other public utilities . Also , given the statistic provided by the state Housing and Community Development Agency that the a . City of Huntington. Beach is hundreds of units behind in affordable housing , I feel that adding this entry level home would benefit the community overall . Respe)ctf'ul'.y yours , Charles F. Parsons w Si 1• 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION 11UNTINGTON BEACH To FILE From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SECTION Subject ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Date March 12 , 1990 FORM NO. 90-12/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-368/ CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-46 Applicant : Charles Parsons Request : Subdivide one 11, 000 square foot parcel into one 6, 000 square foot parcel and one 5 , 000 square foot parcel with easements . Location: South side of Garfield Avenue approximately 365 feet west of Suva Lane Background Staff has reviewed the environmental information form noted above and has determined that a negative declaration may be filed for the project . In view of this, a draft negative declaration was prepared and was published in the Daily Pilot and posted in the Office of the City Clerk for a ten (10) day public review period commencing March 16 , 1990 , and ending April 5 , 1990 . If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration are received, you will be notified immediately. Recommendation The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No . 90-12 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment . Mitigation Measures The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resulting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval . Respectfully ubm' ed Michael on r Assista nner (5122d) (5122d) r .r LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SECTION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Notice is hereby given by the Department of Community Development, 1nvironmental Resources Section of the City of Huntington Beach that the following Draft Negative Declaration request has been prepared and will be submitted to the City Planning Commission for their consideration on April 17 , 1990 . The Draft Negative Declarations will be available for public review and comment for twenty-one (21) days commencing Tuesday, March 20, 1990 . Draft Negative Declaration No . 90-12 in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-368 and Conditional Exception No . 89-46 is a request to subdivide an approximately 11, 000 square foot parcel into two (2) parcels . Parcel one is a 6 , 000 square foot parcel which is proposed to take .access from an easement across Parcel 2, an approximately 5 , 000 square foot parcel . Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89-46 is a request for a reduction in the* Mimimum parcel size, 5, 000 square feet in lieu of the 6, 000 square feet required by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The project is located on the south side of Garfield Avenue approximately 365 feet west of Suva Lane and is zoned R1-FP2 (Low Density Residential-Floodplain) and has a Low Densityt Residential land use, designation in the City' s General Plan. A copy of the request is on file with the City Clerk, City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California . Any person wishing to comment on the request may do so in writing within twenty;,one (21) days of this notice by providing written comments to the Department of Community Development, Environmental Resources Section, P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 . (5122d) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM r (To Be Completed By Lead Agency) 1. Background 1. Name of Proponent Charles Parsons 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 9392 Portsmouth Drive, Huntington Beach, California 92646 (714) 963-4985 3. Date of Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Huntington Beach 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Environmental Assessment No. 90-12, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-368, Conditional Exception No. 89-46 6. Location 10252 Garfield (northeast corner of Tonga Lane & Kaimu Drive) II. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) i Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? X b. j Disruptions, displacements, compaction 4 or overcovering of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? .X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation,deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X i... � Yes Mamie No g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X' e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X L Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X Environmental Checklist -2- (S022d) i Yes Maybe No 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? X 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: u a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X Environmental Checklist —3— (5022d) Yes Maybe No b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13, Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X t b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor— tation systems? X d. '' Alterations to present patterns of circula— tion or movement of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the 'following areas: a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X Environmental Checklist —4— (5022d) Yes Maybe No C. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ X e. Maintenance of public facilities, ,including roads? X f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase in demand upon exist- ing source of energy, or require the development of sources of energy? X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communication systems? X c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? X t e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? X 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X Environmental Checklist -5- (5022d) Yes Maybe No 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? X C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild— life population to drop below self sustain— ing levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,'reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important t examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short—term, to the disadvantage of 7 long—term, environmental goals? (A short— term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a.relatively brief, defini— tive period of time while long—term impacts will endure well into the future.) X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con— siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Environmental Checklist —6— (5022d) F III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation f_ IV. Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case X because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environ- ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date ignatur f ' For Community Development i a Environmental Checklist -7- (5022d) DISCUSSION OF YES AND MAYBE ANSWERS Earth l .B. Overcovering of the soil will result from construction of two single family dwellings where only one currently exists. No significant impacts are anticipated. I .C. Some fill may be required in order to meet National Flood Insurance Program requirements; however, a raised foundation may be used, if so, no signifcant effects are anticipated. Water 3.B. Surface runoff will increase due to overcovering of soils from buildings and drives; however, existing drainage facilities will be sufficient. No significant effects are anticipated. 3.C. The project lies within a Special Flood Hazard Area which requires that all dwellings be elevated to. or above the base flood elevation. If fill is used, a hydrology study will be required to assure that the project will not alter the course or flow of flood waters or increase the level of the base flood elevation. If a raised foundation is used, the foundation shall be vented to'allow for flow of flood waters. No significant effects are anticipated. 3.1. See 3.C. Noise 6.B. The project lies adjacent to Garfield Avenue which is de3ignated as a Primary Arterial in the City's General Plan and has a design capacity of 30,000 vehicle trips per day. As such, the dwellings, particularly the one located adjacent to Garfield Avenue, may be subject to significant noise impacts. If a 6' block wall is constructed atop a maximum 24" retaining wall and is constructed in addition to installing noise insulating windows and doors, no significant effects are anticipated. NO ANSWERS The project would allow for the construction of one additional dwelling on an 11,000 square foot (approximate) lot where one single family dwelling has existed for over 30 years. No significant effects are anticipated. Environmental Checklist -8- (5022d) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH STANDARD MITIGATING MEASURES TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-368 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 90-12 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 89-46 —X 1 . Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers. X 2. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. X 3. Low volume heads shall be used on all showers. X 4. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. X 5. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the state acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. The interior noise levels of all dwelling units shall not exceed the California insulation standards of 45 dba CNEL. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). All measures recommended to mitigate noise to acceptable levels shall be incorporated into the design of the project. A 6 foot high block wall shall be constructed atop a 24" maximum height retaining wall along the entire northern property line. t 6. If lighting is included in the parking lot and/or recreation area energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g., high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage"onto adjacent properties. X 7. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include on—site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. X 8. Existing mature trees on site shall be retained and incorporated into the site plan if feasible. Any existing mature tree that must be removed shall be replaced at a.2:1 ratio with 36" box trees which shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. X 9. If foil—type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department. 10. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be con— structed in compliance with the g—factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g—factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. X 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a grading plan shall be submitted to the City's Department of Public Works. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the project may be required by the Director of Public Works if deemed necessary. 12. Information on equipment or facilities which may generate air pollutants shall be submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District staff for their review prior to the issuance of a Certificate Of Occupancy for any use within the building. 13.' If any hazardous materials are to be used on site, the business must comply with Chapter 1758 of the City's Municipal Code which requires any business that handles or stores hazardous materials, including waste, to inventory the hazardous materials on site and prepare a business emergency plan in case of an accidental release of toxic material . Additionally, all hazardous materials, including waste, must be handled and stored in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. Waste oil is considered a. hazardous waste. 14. Should any abandoned oil wells or tanks be encountered, the Fire Department shall be notified and current standards met as required by Article 15 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Any abandonment of existing wells must be to current standards as well . 15. An on-site qualified archaeologistshould monitor all initial grading and excavation activities. 16. Should any cultural materials be encountered during the initial site survey or during grading and excavation activities, all activity shall cease and the archaeologist "shall determine the appropriate course of action. 17. Should any human bone be encountered during any construction activities on the site, the archaeologist shall contact the coroner pursuant to Section 5097.98 and 5097.99 of the Public Resources Code relative to Native American Remains. Should the coroner determine the human remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted pursuant to .State Law SB 297. _X 18. During cleaning, grading, earth moving or excavation, the applicant shall : a. Control fugitive dust by regular watering, paving construction roads, or other dust preventive measures. 1 b. Maintain equipment engines in proper tune. X 19. During construction, the applicant shall : a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site, b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day, c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05% by weight) for construction equipment, d. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts), e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. X 20. Construction shall be limited to Monday — Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. X 21. Prior to initiation of construction, police and fire departments shall be notified and the departments shall be kept informed about duration and extent of construction throughout the process. ?2. Public Works Department shall provide alternate routes for traffic during the construction phase, if necessary. Adequate signage shall be provided to warn motor vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians of construction. Aitigating Measures —2— (5028d) e 23. All oil facilities within the boundaries of the development which are to be removed and abandoned, reabandoned or to remain must meet all existing requirements of the City of Huntington Beach and the State Division of Oil and Gas. Further protective measures may be required, depending upon the conditions and quality of the abandonments and reabandonments. Additionally, any mobile homes which are placed over abandoned oil wells must be equipped with a household "methane detector." 24. The area must be sampled and monitored for methane each one hundred feet. Each TENTH site must be an augered or drilled hole of a minimum three (3) inch diameter sunk to a depth of ten (10) feet. Each probe site and auger or drill site must be tested for the presence of methane, and all readings must be recorded for each site in PERCENT OF LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT (LEL) of methane. The results of the tests must be submitted to the Fire Department for evaluation. Any anomalously high readings (as defined in the Roberti Methane Study for the State of California) must be addressed and mitigated prior to mobile homes being placed in the area of the high reading. If no anomalously high amounts of methane are encountered, development may proceed. The Fire Department will perform further monitoring activities at surface levels as is deemed necessary. X 25. Dwellings shall be constructed upon raised foundations to meet National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) requirements. The foundation shall be constructed with vents to allow for clear passage of water on all sides and shall elevate the home such that the lowest structural member of the lowest finish floor shall be at or above the Base Flood Elevtion. If fill is used to elevate the dwellings, a hydrology study shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development in accordance with NFIP requirements. t .i> tigating Measures —3— (5028d) 14 50 s carer / o// sNCC-r .PARCEL MAP . 1535A /N r//( Cl)Y OF NUNr1A'CrON 9, CN Oq/INGE COUNTY, CrfC/FU.ON/A VAY 111O ././/r�N../A 1W 00/irl./Mf!J/ ewf N./J.//Ar J/..lw�.1/ ��iyyl'�!�M1•�r0'�4 p... --lfr ✓.T-Av- J, 11 A—��• i. /Al.w.rrA. !•r Ot 00V'/lt n„N[Yp,l 0e/ lA.�n • ,..� � /. ..�w..A J/,P.lr/I./ 1.vtnac G,R,LC 4.y IVM}. A .r../..ne...r H./. Prr..�r l./ O...f• C....,./Y.Ce/..r..,i. n eo D(! 6B Z F.S T -7-9 o!� GA/RFJf'L D A► eNUE .....„a.�a.r..:.A. - 1. -�.—_-n�.��^^ifa+1 __L.`'�i,rr+..>1.--_.-._.✓II-!'ll/• - _—� -___...—..__ 1. ._ -.. _ -_ _ _w.i -�1_ ' \rr w...,.r {"��-- twee• — 1 /r'.�s..�l` � W �i ,^ I I � 1�; t ; I I •� � t i ��`� i• i ����� v. t,l co p Q i \• .W" nets Q 1 y` I 1 �� ------1 �� is-Oz` I » �I-- ! to I I I MOAld1"ZNr WOTCS A/f J/S OF BF.4q/NO5 •_..w..Lna s./+s-sw•!rl :wet./ollJ• />. ♦...wls Iw..r n/w.I n.y..e.rri wrI.M.r.rire r./r� /we en/rr/.n. ./a.n/.eN wren..(s/•Il%l%1 _ ril Nla IM+«w rn//hwrl.,,AIr•n. .•tn T N Nt l.11.MM.IJ�l�ll!(Frr.....! ar enl.c.wn/r.c.ww,rni. fNG/NCCg7 ccgrrr/cure act CNO/N(Cg1 C(grj/jCATC COUNTY J!/gYCYOg7 Cfgr/F/CArC lw.. n.y nw/rw...r/I.•+..../ I.e.I.w.w•/.ilw rArl My w.I I..n .M:I—.. (Ail Nr w.I-Ii.n •1..+:JI.•.i ti w /rwewr. ..r./A/Ir �w>enr /e NMI •/ /)II,/r lln/rwMr. w•:/A %•iI eY N Iri•..r)I%�'r - .Ar wr,./lI/ AIreIY err/l'.wA•!i/!«�/Ir.wa h/A• /Ae /wlwln/l I/J•/:rw//J!J ✓ .'.I.^/ eMli,rl •!:w r�.w/MrI.M /M jrll.�.iiew Mw Ar/ Wwerf w•r.I..n r.w/li/,r./A. C a.n 1/wr.ri� S./yse _�6�,.,�w/��4�N^.s��/:✓.� --�/'s�otO..�LGLI.�_ - l r r 1....r.c./ ✓ v_....... .A /. ay niry c.rny J ..Y.r Environmental Board �2 CITY OF f-IUf ;TINGTC)fV 8E/aCH t (_)lilt(: EiO.•, lqh f�ll!llltlC)Ip(1 6E;i:='i, Department of Community Development April 16, 1990 Environmental Resources Section City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: Mr. Michael J. Connor I . Subject : Draft! Negative Declaration No. 90-12 in conjunction with Tentative parcel map no. 89-368/Conditional Exception No. 89-46. Project Request : Subdivide one 11 ,745 sq. ft . parcel into two parcels (6,000 sq. ft . and 5,745 sq. ft . with easements) Variance to minimum lot size. Location: South side of Garfield Avenue approximately 365 feet west of Suva Lane. II . l.indings: The Environmental Board has completed it review of the Environmental Resources Section Check list for the referenced project and found that their Environmental Check list has failed to address the following issues: Sections 1 .c. (Earth) and 3.c. (Water) both address elevation of structures above 2. base flood elevation. No mention is made of the impact of such construction above the levels of existing contiguous properties. Section 13.b. (Transportation/Circulation) : the situation of the parcel on a concave curve allows for little curb-side parking. Additional building on this site will impact street side parking in the immediate neighborhood. Comments: If construction entails demolition of existing 30 year old structures, regulations concerning safe removal and disposal of any asbestos on site must be strictly adhered to. Close proximity of contiguous inhabited properties makes airborne contamination by friable asbestos particles a particular danger. The parcel map (Assessor's Map book 155 page 06 County of Orange) does not indicate the existing easement across the front of the property accomodating driveway access for neighboring properties. This easement, in addition to the proposed easement across Parcel 2 and the reduced size lot, allows insufficient space for subdivisions of this property. Additionally, the apparent plan requires utilization of one driveway easement for four or five homes. At present , this parcel accesses off Garfield; redirection of traffic from this parcel will impact neighboring properties. III . iXI Recommendation: THE PROJECT NOT BE APPROVED - It is the Environmental Boar 's opinio tha the referenced project will have significant adverse effect on 4th s, r un 'ng ronment. R y H. Richardson Ad hoc Committee Chairperson Chairman Irene Alfieri cc: Mayor Thomas Mays Councilman Peter Green Planning Commissloner Victor Llepzlg • City of Huntington Beach - 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 ;..'� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 June 13 , 1990 Roy Richardson, Chairman Huntington Beach Environmental Board P.O . Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Roy: In your letter dated April 16 , 1990 (copy attached) , you expressed some concerns regarding Draft Negative Declaration No . 90-12 . I would like to address these concerns : Section l(c) Earth - The. project will have no impact upon surrounding properties in regards to elevating the structures because the land is already elevated. Section 13 (b) Transportation Circulation - The project has been redesigned to provide two off street parking spaces for each house . Comments - No demolition is anticipated or planned. The existing house is proposed to be relocated on the site and one new home, will be constructed . If you should have any questions please feel free to call . Since ely, Michael J. IConnor Assistant Planner MJC: kj 1 (TCD-4 ) x • i Irmin Langton 10256 Garfield Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach Planning Commission HB Civic Center 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 17 June 1990 Attn Mike Adams/ Mike Connor _ RE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-368/ i q.90 Conditional Exception (variance) No. t89-46/ Negative declaration No. 90-1.2 (Charles Parsons) PLFf'i`!ii'{ DiV:6iO v Dear Sir: I object to the subdivision of this property on the following grounds: (1) The area in question is zoned for low density. There is no (compelling) reason .for an exception. Let's keep it low density. (2) There is a sizeable easement on the property which further reduces the usable space. Being adjacent to this property,with bedrooms where you can open windows only on the side facing away from Garfield Ave. due to traffic noise and excessive amounts of dust, and escaping to the back yard from the traffic noise, the proposed additional easement along the side wall of my property for cars parking in the garage. . . of house #1 and additional cars of house #2 would be highly. undesirable.and infringe on the quality of life that I have selected and paid for when I bought this property for my home. The property in question .is one of three properties with a larger area than the surrounding tract homes and should not be subdivided into 2 parcels where one parcel would be only about two thirds the minimum size when taking away the easements. Access to the drive on 'the property from the existing easement would require extremely tight turns and maneuvering. Sincerely, Irmin Langton 1 Design Type Codes Requested By. 001 - Single Family Residences Address 999 - Misc. Improvements ( ) BRADLEY�L.JAC BS Phone A ORANGE COUNT Y ASSESSOR Signature 90 NOV 30 AEA I1: 38 PUBLIC SERVICE INFORMATION FORM SFR/T1i/CONDO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 LDG BLDG BLDG IN- TOTAL GARAGE SIZE SIZE SIZE ISHED BEDRMS OR BLDG CONSI USE DESIGN 1ST 2ND 3RD ADD BSMT AND CRPRT POOL LAND APN # YEAR CODE TYPE FLOOR FLOOR FLOOR SIZE SIZE BATHS SIZE Y/.Nr SIZE 3 371-cY f 2� Sr Op DO S SF oo — I a n n n x Q n a z �o � O � 0 O 8; # ° m v A v _.-__ m N v� e o - -m M m o m a 0 *0. 0 x Cr i m N Z 3 m p a o m 0 m � Zi O r 0 Or m - ORZ m O 0) Zo p, to Q> • m W CO) _N 0 N Check Amount S Authorized' By Cash Amount S Mailed Date By M.S. 6/90 - C•rrhW rcayWnr RnIM1W Iraw lrn CI•IR cvnMrrc.Y.11a•m RrMAW Pawl+n 17•IR 6JtilEL7�..4V�. IM °,."' ras+v.wo rt3.'� TAff N11L 1 .e.R,vLJ .ti.Mc,,,a� �.— ..t:nR1R•r arm r Rnsr. Rwu.aRowr•nPR I w'11`�'._.� �1Wy'_'rarrr•r. —•r`�i• .wrl.�w+_P•.s�Ir . ....� rr/lrliw./MIYOY•r�ar_.�r YPr.•ifR LrRPtl "'I�w.rtL�_rr��LI I w.�r..cu s`r�e7r - '{ �- 1 � \ LrRlnaa uua„,.,..nar vao•aruruwP•unLLr.rrR.�r aLpl -emu FiPXis.. 1 I I ti I µa"�"R — c n.LR•.rr' rrw.ter rrr+�� ria�u!tr► — i a rpvsppuari>G 4 I•; nrrrar� u.— :;,,,"'a.•.�'�+'.w�.i�. :r.""rr'. `•."..r•..a��r lit �w•Po•bin.e � ..�-... v T � w�l r- -•-1 a _ � a.�w ... or.n. u�.....,— P"+.. n..l.n.;•+.,. , ,,,M,P,,r �i �iSy1 J I 1. i �ij �rr•+� �i � I Kie51 KdMJ_ _—I IR11�.L•L PI Y'�r"1 � �eevL �i 1Z•�_• .r .r. LT _ r U 1 - •PLI.nrYlef II . 01ViCT wit.'W pnrw•b lrn>L�brlr Im1lau Wns r�r•1_ • •1 -�PRIAN-- _ O __-_ _- Reor Na•M1rr N.raL[I.AYrt 4/YrW ' ' L frw_�rrt�' ter+♦T_T'rt`r= ar rw. 1 ma mpvvAIaA71.o� 11L•KtS. •+•rY+r...«. I. I •LLrHr•YY_.Y.rMl...r.r.ra� 1 P.nW Ir Y•r.•.rY✓•�iw 1 •'l�r�+'�i...Mr. _Mr•�rr.rrr• 7 _ _ _ __ __ Hlp• pun�.`��.u'w__^tax.«... . V v� LLPr:arr. .rrr� i•r•r• tr ry.•.r n ••v Rrfw••r m'o• IaCM I�FL � �\ d.� N AN5¢Yf LLYlL9 Yrrr••+r•�r.rrrr•. I X '4 Q 1 It x -_--- �- LL•11`I,rr.rrar.a.rrw._.`.rPani.rcicrr UFC�K7•qb� w� .. f�f �rwrrr+.rrrrr � �1(��1� � +! f PKLA•.L i� P'uWtlr mrr«••.q+Y•YY.srrrr p� �[/ 1,�yeA-Wf'.(.RlP11oN 611n01r LYR Wt�_r,r•r..Yr•� ���` \ •LLPMt Asp►1.rrrr WrP...rr.1.WC \ I ldf LLllrr•rr^ r�r �I ' T TG(.T Isuw4..1r rr.rn�rr_r.w_rr \ 'LPr ar.._..rl�r•P.P...-l.rr.rr.r r.r.ra.rrwo.w.•• (� \ .• LL�i%r•rrsr►rar_�rm«r_�a•�rra. 1 ... \kI ' � .. . .. 9 LLnnr lVt-na�rr•.�,r�rV+..r•rrr� — .-.. LLnwq trl.rrrYar.r Y«.YyYr-rw�r P.PrY_rYr\�,� r..r•i• � rrra_rY.�.Yr d• lurev T ltf ALN. ....... N ... hIFr-,FLAN (�•Lfl{1C411;>JC LoWIJMCLw r�"'P-L _ I I I rw.��.rnalvrt,w I I 'I I I I I• °,d h1•VS.ofJ Inc ss. luriucs � �.N yr..t.t°u�.�un:La two wicr cue.u ulu I W u� �•weou+rr�uy oL n-lu D —11M1ID btO•'f w11�. L[LATiON oM ��e'res 41/h3f. ::waE.ss►nrre Ml..cs w I ®.a .- a �-I � I err�i a�O L�e:Imo•o:c.. . I-If� � �ra`� •R� -�rn'rk:ia.t-yc.t uuu I ❑ ❑ I I FlO YG�.Wfr�,F.P. 1 tom^ zL Q r+-vtt oeren.ot � w.rtac.ue nay a ❑ ❑ t I�u 'R a r, t •a .r'rr •; _ `It' '�' Y •��el•. � I , I —D'.Y flblit W'11Vq n � JI; Jii �Ij N `}ap ' T '•o+ �(J w•�Nera 11 F � III rll III � Tl�1I� � � )� fo•.CJ µ��f/!d O �I I �I I �y, �1 aL [iR/WC-HI►11'./.11 4 t ti I I { eq 73°M` Pt - E3 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ w I D l �/ .I��AQ PEA.ra 1•b.pT-mil .Mi7 V1<L�L.� �w o+r�.:b n�_D• s'-o• O'o• .. NSA � d.�N�1J � wInt.a.J 1°wM'�J AM �r'sNrnrc+lac�-lu!''vPn.+aCMuu° 1NI -nON RAW (-I I.ux Nw.eav rea,couL pC IGiTINCa�1 GY K-f'IAN-I�DdCG��1 I.�u iovr"' 'lla e.+""""wri ir`_ 7 Yw1.B N•-p ._L �.G�•���,�,IL�m. M- _ Ywl.a 1.4• I-O... _/e_a....__ ..___..___.J �/Sil mow, W.Drfa wfYi'.a ._T64e 1�+c1..n5Slca++� wrap i O,�'ftD A.G .7L+K� SKI ®`iL•E d`CIL.... RjVe•m m•n ` I aD �1 0 a i t�2� a ? oil P 9 •o a II y 7oq)-b1 1 ©gyp a© Off' $N T (� r�a•a ,.a nrac. UTa I 1 1 �1 IY I I j I y arna�v 1 rJ S � � C _ 000®a0OOOC N Qa O Z - 3y A d 4 �!laLfT�L,l;�71DN P-I i i -- , I ta.R. .,..... I1 1 i I1 eLT �a/ATIDN P-I i ` — i 1 ICJ � i o n o tt v�eNvsp� � �•4�.RT-N E4LY .__�_—. yDieY rom � i �s¢,spay i C I i I I i i ' I i I IN _--- - 7+�Ef::..._ - J I.0 DUG.d�K�C z 2i L 11 /LLLG Y4•-r-O• r� January 1Q , 1991 To : Councilmembers City of Huntington Beach , Ca . From : Charles Parsons IN E° C E I V E D, 10252 Garfield Ave . Huntington Beach , Ca . 92646 JAN 1991 Re : Use Permit 90-69 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEW To all councilmembers , PLANNING DIVISION I am the property owner involved in the matter of Use Permit 90-69 which is a request to move a house within the City of Huntington Beach . I am aware that many of you have been contacted by my neighbor at 10256 Garf'ie.ld Ave . , who is protesting said move .This letter is to inform you of my attempts to contact my neighbor in person , by phone , and by mail in the hopes of having her withdraw her protest and therby not waste any more of the Councilmembers valuable time or mine . I feel the move is a very positive one from all aspects and many -of the other neighbors support my efforts .Here are some of the reasons ; 1 .The . use of an existing structure will reduce the amount of time required to complete my project and thereby lessen noise and any other inconvenience tothe neighborhood . 2 .The present owner of the house is excited to see the house that his family grew up in being saved from the wrecking ball as his land is being rezoned at the corner of Garfield and Bushard . This house will have historical value in the future as it belongs to a pioneeer Huntington Beach Family . 3 .The removal of the structure from the present location should help clean up . that corner and reduce any chance of traffic accidents caused by persons using the existing driveways on Garfield . It will also eliminate the noise exposure that the City of Huntington Beach has created by street wid.ening at that location. i4 .The recycling of, the house should save quite a few trees and other types of building materials instead of having- it wind up in a landfill as most other displaced houses have in Huntington Beach . 5 .Adding an entry level home and keeping the costs required to do so down will help reduce .the shortage of affordable housing as stated in the Housing and Community Development report as adopted by the City Council. .on July 16 , 1990 . 6 . Security for the neighborhood should be improved by having a house that will have a clear view of both adjoining streets . 7 .From a personal point of view , this home will be my retirement nestegg and someday become my children ' s chance at owning a vanishing piece of the American Dream, homeownership . Respectfully sujtted , I may be reached at 714-9692.950 or at P .O . Box 674 H . B . 92648 January 3 , 91 To : Irmin Langton 10256 Garfield Ave . ►moo CEIV : �� Huntington Beach , Ca . .JAN 1 1991 From : Charles Parsons 10252 Garfield Ave . DEPARTMENT OF ,COMMUNITY DEVELOPMERTi Huntington B each , C a . PLANNING DIVISION. This letter is in response to the written protest you have made with the City of Huntington Beach in regards to Use Permit 90-69 relating to the moving of the structure at 9542 Garfield Ave . , Huntington Beach onto my property at 10252 Garfield Ave . , Huntingtnn Beach . This is also a follow up to the conversations you and I had regarding this matter and to the verbal objections you have voiced to the Planning De'partment . In light of the fact that the concept of adding another house onto my property was approved by the Planning Commission in . June , 1990 and you had expressed. concern to me about dust and noise that may be generated by new construction which could take six to nine months to complete , I investigated the moving of an existing house which would only require modifications to fit my lot . The house I found will require considerably less time to complete the project and therefor less dust and noise and any other inconvenience to the neighborhood .The structure at 9542 Garfield will only require remodeling time similiar to that required to complete a room addition . The City of Huntington Beach is requiring that the house be re- stuccoed and repainted and that new french windows be installed as conditions of approval of this pro.ject . I will also be putting new roofs on both buildings , new concrete driveways and walkways , new fencing and blockwalls , landscaping , and other improvements . The existing house will also be restuccoed and repainted and updated to increase its value . I feel. these improvements will enhance the neighborhood and help reinforce property 'values . I am hoping these improvements will be the catalyst to motivate other neighbors to rehabilitate their homes , �. 2 I also feel that adding the soundwall that the City requires along the Garfield frontage will reduce some of the traffic noise which carries onto your property as well as mine . I have verbally offered to pay for continuing this wall along the 57 . 5 frontage on Garfield on your property as`\ a token of my appreciation for any inconvenience that you may have t.o endure during the construction period and I am doing so in writing at this time . As with any other concerns which you have expressed to me in the past as to how my property affects yours , I will attempt to mitigate any future concerns which you may have , as a good neighbor should . I am asking you to reconsider your protest and withdraw it as soon as possible , as the delay could cost thousands of dollars considering that we are moving into the rainy season and other scheduling problems which have been created by your protest . I have spent over a year of my life and a considerable amount of money to get my , project to this point and I hope that you could look at this project from my point of view as I have looked at it from your perspective . I feel the improvements to my property will inforce property values and will not negatively impact your investment or your space . Please reply , You may reach me at 714 969-2950 or P .O . Box 674 , Huntington Beach , 92648 ate° NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR' S APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 90-69 (A request to permit the relocation of an existing house from 9542 Garfield Ave. to 10241 Kaimu Drive presently known as 10252 Garfield) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements 'of all persons who; wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, January 22, 1991, 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: APPEAL OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ' S APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 90-69 APPLICANT: Charles Parsons- APPELLANT: Irmin Langton LOCATION: 10241 Kaimu Drive (Presently known as 10252 Garfield Ave. ) ZONE: R1-FP2 REOUEST: To permit the relocation of a house presently at 9542 Garfield Avenue to 10241 Kaimu Drive (Presently known as 10252 Garfield Ave . ) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15303 , Class 3 of the California Environmental Quality Act . COASTAL STATUS: Not , applicable ON FILE : A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the public . A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after January 18, 1991 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Mike Connor, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk (8230d) 115-061 -01 I.55-•061-02 Prepared for :: Vern Cr:LS:ler ,.1e I"C: ry hi Gardrier. Requested by:: Kirk ,, Thomas J Et Al. 1.0:301 Samoa I)r E:caa c 1 8 34•l' Gifford T F•Ic.crrt:i r1(J"t.Orl 13C-?aC:1-1 ,, (:;a `:=<::646 Fountain Va:I.:Lc:� Cd• _ :1.55 -061 -0:3 155- 061 --04 1;:;5..-061.-07 M:i.chzae:I. A I)carre:I. RC.)T"1a:I.CI A W:i.:1.:1.:i.<"arl<s Fern Gi. :I.i))r 10291 Samoa I)T• 1.0271. Samoa Dr - West , Oran 1-Ic.(('11'.:i.rig1.C)r1 I."C-)aC:h C:<a 92649 1--luri•tinc;Jton, Beach , Ca 92646 19042 Tonga I...n tIUrrt.:i T-19'LC)r1 1".3C-,<"aC:h.,,. (:;<� Rose O'Reilly Doris Hill <ii<a t. i.<.sh K1A11t lr :1.90,-.;<:. T•(:)T-I(:1<•a I...r1 Hill,, Dor:i.<s %:Lc::(:: 1•-iunl".:i.ngton I:eachi ,Ca 92646 19062 . Tonga L..n 1.01011,51. I-I(.cnti.r1gton I:eat::h ,C:a 92646 Huntington Beach , Ca 94V"T ;. 4 L 15:=-061.-1:I. :L:`.i:`:i• 0<•):L...:L2 155-061-•:1.:3 Fern Gisler r i'•ern Gisler sl.er (x(i?t:)T't)ti`. W Cox Ii:(4>Li::l"1(:�r ,, (:;•C)1CI:i. I) I')eI.SOT 1, St.<:tr ..1 :L02£3:1. M<ai,ka:i I)r" 19261 Ma:i k a 1 Dr . 4904 Onyx St. I-I(.(nt i.rig tars Death Ca `a]e.)46 .r Huntington I;r..ach;, Cglf.�}(o Torrance, Ca 90;":;0:3 I.:.`;:`.'i-06:I....:I.5 :I.55-061-1 h :I.15-061.--17 Michael Monahan .Jea f"frey N Perk:i.r1<.:> I)<arla.e l 19051 Suva LT-1 1.9041 Suva L-r1 :1.0:302 Si:rl`'Ioa Dr Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 Huntington I:eachi , Ca 92646 Huntington Beach , Ca 92646 :I.55-•061 l'O :I55-061 -19 :1.55-061•-21. 'T'hayre T i i-.)T-,CI(:T-S Eugene I : Eekh(:)ut: :I T-FI:i.n R I_.arlg'tOrl :1.01:.` 2. Sc l l•I(]<a I)T" 10272 SamoaI)T" :1.0<:'.::1(�) Garfield �V L.Ic.cr'I"I:.:i.ngton Beach , Ca 92646 h•Ic. nt.:i.rlgton Beach , Ca 92646 I••I(:(rit. i.r1(1"Lc.)r1 Beach , Ca 9264b., 155.-0611. 155-•064-'0:1. Ri.;l)(-:>r..l: E' ::;c..(.)t:":. h•'(t:rr1 (::a..:>.I.er John l•:: Gerringer :1.0':'.62 C, ar•f:i.e:1.d A yC,C)r1rIC.)r, ,.J(-.�rry 10252 Ma:i.k<a:i I)r Huntington Beach , Ca 92646 26992 La Pa ja Hc.crrl.:i.ri9tC.)r1 De.1C1-1 y C:a E)4(, I''I:I.S<.:>:I.(:)r1 V:i.ej(:), Ca 9269 .i.55-•29.i.-0.I. .1.55...29.1.• C1..:. .l..J5...291....0.3 ThC)T-19 11A.r1h Nc:J(.(yeT•1 MEA.v:i.r1 1 1••1ar1:)er Ihe:Lv:ir1 :I: 1••LirE)er 10231. Ka:i.1�u Rich-ter, Lloyd W Phillips, Orrin Huntington Beach , Ca 92646 1.193,".-j Cyl:)reSS N'. 1012L:I. K<":i:irtu Dr Fountain Valley, C J% V1708 Huntington Beath, Ca 155...29 1 -04 153- 291 05 15';--291•-06 I�fi•;�:Lv:i.r"1 :I: Harper Brek-t. Inc Bernard (:;,(•:IiargCa C:a.l..l:i.vany fit.t5s<sc:�a'J. .J 2323 nrdshea1 Dr 10:18 N East St 1020:1. Ka:i.i*u Dr La h-I<•abr<•a , Ca 9063:1. r1r1<aI)c;�:i.m., C.�:1 92£)0:*; 1-1UTrL:i.r•19"t.C)rl Beach , 0-49�f.4-lo .I.55...292-0:1. _ 155"292-02 .L.":15-292...03 Melvin :I: Harper BarryTaylor YI„ n C.: Wang White, Sal•a.tel I::. Ii::•t. Al Taylor , Barry 1.0212 Kairu Dr :1.0':::32 K<ai.l*u Dr 1.02..::'2 K<aimu DrI••Iunt".:i..r1gton Beach , 01....9<'F)416 ; . Plum i ngtOr1 I:tF:•)<"ach� Ca• quq.� A'.n't:ington -Iieac:hr,Ca 926410 :I.55-292-•04 :I.;`.`;;`:i•- 9 -••0;: :I.55-292-16 ..101irl J Mc.:COT-rli.C:k Mel.v:i.n j Harper Robert Brady 10202 K a:i.rlu Dr Di Mat"t":i o, ..John 1-1 10191 Ma:i.ka i Dr Huntington Beach, (:;a 926416 10192 Kail*Ic.c Dr I'•Iun'1 :ir1(f"t()r1 Beach ,, Ca 9 646 . I-�IIIr•�•h •i r•�1•I•!•r•,r� r-0c�_at-h1, f'�il �.]f��e •...:. r-044-•03 156-044•-04 Prepared for . ,Jahn R ,.laced*o 1zc:b r1: 1-3 Heil Requested by:: :1.£ 95:1. San. Blas £3t :1.0263 Or:i.c:):LE:•? Ave Rep : Fountain Valley, Ca 92708 Fountain Valley, Ca 92708 156-•044-05 156-045._02 :t;. 6 04:`5-03 Hugh H Magill L_aruc.-� A I�f<ar.;I<(:?s:if:•?y 10:3<.4 Or:i.c:).Le•? Aver :1.03:1.0 (:)r'i.(:):I.(:9 .Ave: t is •�... �.�..�..�08 .'. Valley y (. a �.�:.�7 ) 1='(a(.(rr:.;aa.r•� My, c.:<a.l. :..�0£:3 I�•cac..r��l•.:aa.r•� V<a.LL(c:y, Ca r.<:.. . 1.5 I�•'�:u.crrl•.<aa.r'� J<al..l.r::., ;�.•ic.;f.:, 156-045-04 :I.56-045•-0,`.i :Lb6...04 5-OEM 1<i;�nr�y :3 Thomas G Kohl ,.Jordan Brown 10300 . Or:i.ale .Ave 10206 Oriole Ave 0214 00615 ,1vW . Fountain Vly, Cal 92700 Fountain My, Cal 92708 Fountain SJaa.:Lc;•y, Ca :I.::6 -04;':i- M7 :I.56-045-0£3 *£:;F:faRCH COMPLETE Pasquale C;e•?le:l.:l.a Carl W 1._anghortst. Pili::(:O1::O£:f 1:'U: D. 10 10264 Oriole Ave 10252 Oriole Ave RE:(:;(:3RD i R;:i:T'U'I:�N[.:D: I Fountain Valley, Ca 92708 Fountain Valley, Ca 9270F) I...ftST :1.5 045 -•00 TRW 1908 8 .L,.1..1 R:.r R.. .L/ .1...R:.9 2 10 i.,.1..1...R:.'r<.. .L r h'ic: lv:i.n I 1••10rl:)er• M I: Harper Johanna Kuns-k. W:i.dowsk:i. , William ,.J Cxuc::z:ka , William 10221 Ma:i.kai. Dr :I.020:1. h1:T:i.k:a:i. Dr 102'.11 Maikai Dr I"II.IT'i�.::LT1C)'(.�:)Yl I:<::::Tc::IT , Ca `:=.�:'.64 Huntington Beach CA 92G� I•'Ic.cn•ka.nc:Jton Beach , CA L..c)ri:•r.0 Melvin :I: Harper Llyc.ck B Yoon 10231 Ma:i.k<a:i. Dr Hale, Nancy I.: :I.622Z A O I"IlAri'('.:LrU)"(.on Beach , Ca 92646 19126 Magnolia tiit *20 38 Fountain Valley, Ca 92708 I Ic.crrk i.r�c:) (:c:)T� Iic:�<ach Ca, 156-034-14 • 5 .J i:)I') C I%i c: R i.T::h a r d (;; I)e:L(: ng William ITT Clark :1.0 }.:39 .I.0230 Ori(:),I.e Ave :I.02 :6 Oriole Ave Fountain V:Ly, Cal 92708 Fountain Valley, Ca 92700 Fountain Vly, ( al 92708 :1.02:1.4 R:*.:.:•1"(.JRNED:: 12 Fountain Valley, Ca TRW :1.90 Office o e City Clerk City of Huntington Beach �!;?.. - .77=L= P.O.'BOX i��f•ir cue � nrL �., � j _,� � tJ,r a „ X190 CALIFORNIA92648 %le,: f i,t,.,'riti, hlc.crrl::i.r�t� Lc�r� Tcca<at::li y (::<:� 92e.546. Office of the C ty Clerk �---- -m�-- - -w=--�.-.ti _ City of Hunt' gton Beach ,.�. =>,- � � %t P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ���' • �.�t+��- �r .-- .- s ". - ; Office of the City Clerk City of Huntington ch P.O.BOX 190 CALIFO 992648 I ! t i1,. a 1 _ Iv� . 1 � Jt:�Iir� ,.J I1t::c::or i li.c::k P.O.Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 155-292-03 Resident 10212 Kaimu Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Office of the City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 155-292-04 (� Resident 10202 Kaimu Dr. `y Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Office of the City Clerk to City of Huntington Beach P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 155-292-04 John J. McCormick 15242 Cahlon Circle Irvine, CA 92714 sm Office of the City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 / 155-293-01 Melvin Harper Sanuel White 10232 Kaimu Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 w r NOTICE TO: THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK THE AP LISTS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR NOTIFICATION MAILINGS BY THE CITY CLERK MUST BE THE LATEST'AVAILABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIVISION T. EMERT9. *** ***PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE LIST MAY HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE MAILING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WAS SENT. DATE j SIGNATU V RI ING ADEQUACY OF LIST CM) Continental Land Title Company Subsidiary of lawyers Title Insurance Corporation PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATION I , Lynn Tilley certify that on 1/4/91 the attached property owners list was prepared by Continental Lawyers Title Company, pursuant the request of Said list is a complete and true compilation of owners of the . subject property involved and is based upon the latest equilized assessment rolls . I further certify that the information filed is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Contine al Lawyers Title Company By: — Y1n J Date : �— �- 1015 North Main Street,Santa Ana,California 92701 • P.O.Box 10100,Santa Ana,California 92711 • (714)835-5575 POR. N.E //4, N.W. //4, SEC. 5, T65, R /O W. 155 - 6 156 - 04 =� Q 156-07 a 8c - QQ � Q 1 -g GARF/EL D _ SEC.32, T. 5 S..R. /0 w. AVENUE o ` SEC. 5, T. 6 S.,R. /O W.'.. 1 � �5' sus sus Ga,\ 2 3 4 f �� a 34 co " � 600e 6a� I 5 6 T 8 9 / /l "' /2 /3 �" /4 �� /5 �, 9' 3 /4-5 TRACT ° ' 21 c2 O � O.u � O of IO v Q © CDO O O O 23 O O 10 a . . II 12 9. 2 4o 0 . pqR. I PAR.2 PA 0 o b 43.79' 13 /6 4-4- 3 KA/MU c_ h�. CDs_ 0� fe c DRIVE q— ` 3,.aSA/1�01 DRIVES ' Q cp ii•cco6 � �� m 70.95o . 6 ' IQ ,6 GO 45.4 P /Z .17 i 60 .a.ic' 63 cs s2. ioo 0 W R.S. 79-20 v� ;a n', in 16 a 15 14 13 I2 O h ( o O7 p O6 N ^ N J , O 13� ro 17 72 9z' P 42 ° A o � 6.�7 15 6 18 p N ` 60' /8 roe' 64 75 0' 0 / .0 '32 6�•rO 3/ 30 29 70-f4 W ioa' N ���e4' 74 60' 73/ 15 H es 38 37 36 35 34 .2;33 a8� ios.e9sZs zi iaa' 'p 39 40 4/ 42 43 44- 45 M Q 16 u Q b Oaios' 68 ro 69 v0 " � o \ \ ' h2 0 4 v 17 / 70 Z N 24 IN_ /�65'o u . 0 66 ro O�13 p O r- C o 60 p ' \ ` 0 ce ftj f . ,g 25 O 20 3jCp' GS.S/• 6p' ' 34, Qg.67' 7f.98 43.80 60 r• 60' N B �S 46 27 `\ �9 0 MIA/KA,./.-� OR/VE N 0 t8 2i ►� 26 cie2 P 80 6ASB' co,9c Go' " " 60' sooa M 19 52.12• 0 46 g 32 45 �r t 22 O d 4 O o j e 36 3� O 33 32 31 o 4-7 28 27 47 25 23 p O [� r ioo' 57 , p 62 �o� r 60 59 a ' • 0 lI oX25 / ci e � 72.iz' o O 56 55 54 53 52 5/ 6oso 64-6� 49 9s.78' 4B - 56 24 ioo' TR.NO /o 60 50 G� 6O Q� 07 TA NA DRIVE S MARCH /964 TR. NO. 5025 M.M. /94-24,25,26 TR. NO. 5026 M. M. /94-27,28,29 N r ``s '" NOTE -ASSESSOR'S BLOCK B ASSESSO ;S-MA'P r PARCEL MAP /4-50 . . '� . . ., • .,:�; , .. .::;�E r.� i,.. PARCEL NUMBERS BQOM55�PAGE'46 SHOWN IN CIRCLES /00 06 TONGA s L All►E 07 /O •7S .� 20 a a 103.-To /03,So /03.So /03,50' TRAC T r Sp S� a bo O 2� 2�. bo' �', O 6 O 0 �0" O O `� /o3sa' 34 53 /o o' 73 `9 74 93 33 a,s � 54 /07.70' 41 . Q. O 19 � Q 32 3552 /r 55 72 7592 j /o�as• ,l 30 O3 18 �+' � 30 18 30 18 Q 3/ 36 51 /' 5671 76 9/ 0/ 7.bo' "*. 30 /0 7.ss" 37 5a 5770 7790 LOS•L'E NES 29 3849 5869 7889 STREEr ,. 16 50 16 O O ` O6 16 60 I b 60 13 CV � g ro v) 28 0 3_9 5968 79 8 27 /07 a` 4047 6067 8087 ul ' O O 14 70 14 70 14 26 /oz 41 4/ 46 6/ 66 8/ 86 J O O 13 O 13 O 13 25 /07 je' 4245 Q 6265 8285 j 24 /Oz g/ 10-1 43 4 /o3.so• ; /03.5-0'63 4 /09.3-0' /as.so 83 84 a goo bo' �o a •� �?a 10 y 10 `� I'I o h° IQ o I.� bo 0 04305 57.14" p 63.ao' 83.to• 2 83.4•o 83.60• L 63.40 83 60' K/PAHULU LANE 28 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK& ASSESSOR'S MAP PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 155 PAGE 29 MARCH 1969 TR. NO. 4305 M.M. 164- 12 TO 18 INC. SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE CD 156- 03 r LAS 04 FLORES /r t /00, 22 42 "o // 62 75 „o //z oO 76 TRA ,/z• 48 s/ „z � `� so 43 47 ,iZ.so Go• Sao 21 � �� � �� 2341 "o Q W //2,so' 0 2 „2-50' -u � l� G J 75' 7s' J 49 60 63 74 44 4�5 46 ~ Q Q 02 0 24 40 ,o 3, Z 0 50 59 64 73 ;Q //z,so 78 vl i O 19 ^ 75 12 t O w '�° 70,55' '� 25 07• LOS LEONES STREETS � 'O5• 4 II 4 II LOS g5?NES O O n 5/ 58 65 72 STREET"�\ 0 18 u N O `�y 17 C 16 15 14 5 O ` O 10 q 19 to 26 �, 5257 6671 /o,si• 39 J J as' 38 / is' 37 7 z6G' 36 35 7O' Q H 1S ,�j e► tq 6 29 30 3/ 32 33 34 Z O O O O O 18 Q O 7 53 56 v 67 70 O /,2,so' 2 //2 Q //O'Go /,o,5s 28; O8 O 10 I I 12 13 Q 54 55 r 6B 69 v o d �. O \ \ 60 s O 0 O 490' u�i O O a f Ze' /S, IS S' 85.45' 65' n GS 65.o-i` o b N SAN FEL ME `$ STREET O N 6G AG Q tf 4st2429 cja '50' S:Q Q � c o � o mo � o 0 oNo 0s � I co:, O• W 2 �' IO 0 2 • O3 4 n 5 � O n 7 � 8 0 9 0 10 � 11 � 12 m 13 14 15 4 n r o o 1 ri . °j p5� W Q c o o °I ai °j o 0 0 o c N0 40 / o 00, K/PAHULU 2/ 740G' 129 70' 6s' /9 /81 /7 /6 151 . 141 /3 /2 // /Ol 9 1 8 67' 7 ` tea' 6 ,,9.//' S LANE 01 MARCH 1964 T"R. NO. 5040 M. M. /88- 26,27 NOTE -ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 8 ASSESSOR'S MAP PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 156 PAGE 03 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE 156 -04 07 1oo' SAN PASOUAL -8 S.TREE 7' ,2.50• 77 50 /0 3 700 48 5 44 43 42 41 40 39 W 'S•P 9 6 5.o ' 94.93' O n o H J pp FACT m , 21 22 ° 23 N 24 25 O 27 28 29 O 31 N O 30 ( 30' 6 J 20 In .3 ` Q no. 90 71ep LAJ O 19tnO a SAN a CARLOS STREET. . 8970 Zt O o, Lc iio.0 s �lJ � 91.12' Ga•so . . .so• 54.43', . p 70•as SUVA Q , 52 0 3.so �''�R. ��i4 's LANE pi �3 18 Q 67 o N O n boi a ,0.09 8RR 7.3 7 74 O 19 a. ' 4 31. O O O O O d O 4 176653 Q O 30 129 128 127 26 25 69.so' O18 !00 S 32 as• 2/ ,38. v 2 3 4 Q 33 O16 6554 3 3 3 6O I? J I .O.,G 85r 6 3 + 3 O Q CD O i5 , . /s, 6455S4.s7' 'Q 4 6 15 i0 to O O 7 16 O a~ -a �o 'n O O ° SAN BLAS ,, STREET r'T 6556 4s.1 5'7.93'/9 YI 8 8 3618 �o •s��.e:' O o O o O 6 62 7 �.»' Q 19 O ' r 73' /312 /4 10 1 7 9 .J 3717 c -p //o. 80 J 81 Z Q 38 16 p o 8 LAS H h 6059 " 6 rj , a O Q, FLORESO ' s r. , O O 1 I 12 a V 14 15 s ; NO 4833 W 3' ' !Qo• O .9 �o' iit' ,Z, ' 15 9 /o' 03 MARCH 1965 TR. NO. 4833 M. M. 199- 22, 23 NOTE -ASSESSOR'S BLOCK & ASSESSOR'S MAP PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 156 PAGE 04 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE LA 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH LAiINTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Mike Adams From . Connie Brockway Director` Community Development City Clerk. Subject APPEAL OF BUILDING RELOCATION Date December 27, 199:0 10252 Garfield Avenue Attached is an appeal received today to the Zoning Administrator's approval of the above relocation. The' Municipal Code states the hearing shall be set for the first regular meeting after the time for filing protest has: expired. Thjs would be January 7, 1991. Please inform me of the notification requirements: and if you plan to transmit the matter for hearing on January 7, 19.910 CB:pm Attachment VF .r Irmin Langton 10256 Garfield Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 City of Huntington Beach December 26, 1990 . Re: Use Permit No. 90-69 Charles Parsons I am appealing the decision of the Zoning Administrator, "►+c Placing an old house (anno 1953) on the property adjacent to mine will (a) compound .the negative effect on my property of the city's approval to create a sub-minimum size lot by causing a further devaluation of my property (b) contradict the concept of neighborhood enhancement. - ca = �.C���-•�'C �.L..(, i/,J . . _ c�ram"` Irmin Langton J r,) NOTI (A) Notice is hereby given that the property owner of the property commonly referred to as 10252 GARFIELD AVENUE as described on Tentative Parcel Map 89-368 (Subject Property) plans to relocate the existing Single Family Residence at 9542 GARFIELD AVE onto Parcel 2 of the subject property. This property shall hereafter be referred to as 10241 KAIMU DRIVE. (B) If a written protest, signed by one or more persons who own real property within three hundred (300) feet of the location to which the structure or structures is to be moved, is filed in the HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CLERKS' OFFICE within seven (7) days after the notice of moving and relocation has been posted, such protest shall be heard and determined by the city council at its first regular meeting after the time for filing protests has expired: and (C) If a written protest has not been filed with the city clerk, as provided in subsection (b) hereof, and provided that all other requirements have been satisfied, including approval of said relocation by the Zoning Administrator, a relocation permit will be issued. (1185-2/66, 2431-7/80) NUWW— PIR � ``s a ii9' L a City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street P. O . Box 190 Huntington Beach, Ca.92648 (714) 536-5271 i"' ,f Z is•. � 17.28.010 - 17.28.010(b)(6) Chapter 17.28 MOVING BUILDINGS (764-4/60, 1185-2/66, 1208-5/66, 1244-8/66, 2337-1/79, 2431-7/80, 2975-12/88, 3022-12/89) Scin • 17.28.010 Permit--Application--Conditions 17.28.020 Permit--Application 17.28.030 Moving notice cards posted 17.28.040 Moving notice card specifications 17.28.050 Cards posted in conspicuous place 17.28.060 Card posting period 17.28.070 Determination of effect of move 17.28.080 Review by zoning administrator 17.28.090 Decision of zoning administrator 17.28. 100 Protest and hearing 17.28. 110 Relocation permit--Bond required 17.28.120 Bond conditions 17.28.130 Default in performance of conditions--Notice given 17.28. 140 Cash bond--Manner of enforcement 17.28. 150 Option to demolish building 17.28.160 Bond--Period and termination -Y' 17.28. 170 Entry upon premises 17.28. 180 Default--Completion of work by city 17.28.190 Interference witit completion by city 17.28.200 Relocation permits--Exception 17.28.010 Permit--Application--Conditions. (a) No person, firm or corporation shall move any building, structure, or portion of a building or structure into the City or relocate within the City, or cause the same to be. done without first obtaining a separate relocation permit for each building or structure. (b) Such relocation permit shall be subject to the following conditions: (1 ) Payment of a nonrefundable relocation fee, established by resolution of the City Council ; (2) All streets shall be dedicated to their ultimate right-of-way and improved to City standards including street trees, street lights and street signs; (3) All utilities shall be installed .underground; (4) On-site walkways and driveways shall be installed to City .standards; (5) The building shall be repainted; (6) Payment of all required fees; and 12/89 17.28.010(b)(7) - 17.28.040(b) (7) A cash bond in the amount specified in section 17.28. 110(b) . - (1208-5/66, 1244-8/66, 2337-1 /79, 2431-7/80) 17.28.020 Permit--Application. To obtain a permit the applicant shall first file an application therefor. Every such application shall contain or have appended thereto the following information: (a) Name of street and official house number, the name of the tract and/or block and zone use legend, the lot number and its dimensions, where the building or structure to be moved is to be placed; (b) The proposed use or occupancy for the building; (c) The tract, block, lot, zone use and official address of the building or structure' s existing location; (d) ' All dimensions and structural type of the building or structure; (e) The nature of the repairs and any alterations or additions; (f) The complete valuation of the proposed work; (g) A plot plan drawn to scale shall be filed with the application. Such plot plan shall indicate with dimensions, all existing and proposed setbacks; and (h) Two clear photographs of the building. (764-4/60, 2431-7/80) 17.28.030 Moving notice cards posted. When such application is filed with all the .information required, the building shall be inspected to determine if the structures can be made to conform with applicable State of California and Huntington Beach building regulations. If the structure can be made to conform, the moving notice cards shall be made and posted by the City. If the building cannot be made to conform with the minimum requirements of the Huntington Beach Building Code, the application shall be denied. (1185-2/66, 2431-7/80, 2975-12/88) .17.28.040 Moving notice card s2ecifications. The notice of moving and relocation card shall contain the following information: (a) A brief description of the structure or structures, and the address from which and to which it is proposed to move such structure or structures; (b) A statement that if a written protest, signed by one or more persons who own real property within three hundred (300) feet of the location to which the structure or •structures is to be moved, is filed in the Office of the City Clerk within seven (7) days after the notice of moving and relocation has been posted, such protest shall be heard and determined 12/89 17.28.040(b) - 17.28.100 Al by the City Council at its first regular meeting after the time for filing protests has expired; and (c) A statement that if a written protest has not been filed with the City Clerk, as provided in subsection (b) hereof, and provided that all other requirements have been satisfied, a relocation permit will be issued. (1185-2/66, 2431-7/80) 17.28.050 Cards posted in conspicuous olace. One moving notice card shall be posted in clear view in a conspicuous place approximately fifteen (15) feet back of the front property line on the lot to which it is proposed to move the building or structure. If the proposed move of the building or structure is to a corner lot, a second moving notice card shall be posted in like manner, facing the secondary street. A moving notice card shall be posted on the front of any building or structure to be moved within the City. (1185-2/66, 2431-7/80) 17.28.060 Card posting period. The moving notice cards shall remain posted for a period of seven (7) consecutive days . At the end of such time, moving notice cards shall be removed by an official of the City. (1185-2/66, 2431-7/80) 17.28.076 Determination of effect of move. If, following initial inspection of the building, it is determined that the structure would have an adverse effect on the characteristics of the neighborhood to which it is proposed that the building be moved, the Planning _Director shall refer the matter to the Zoning Administrator. (1244-8/66, 2431-7/80, 2975-12/88, 3022-12/89) 17.28.080 Review by Zoning. Administrator. The Zoning Administrator shall review the matter as an administrative act to determine whether the movement of the building to its proposed location will adversely affect the, neighborhood based on the following criteria: (2975-12/88) (a) The age of the building compared .with the age of those already in the neighborhood; (b) Architectural design of the building compared with those in the neighborhood and the effect upon same; and (c) The size of the structure in comparison to those in the neighborhood. (1244-8/66, 2431-7/80) 17.28.090 Decision of Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator may approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the application for a permit to relocate. (1244-8/66, 2431-7/80, 2975-12/88) 12,21.10 -2roteat and hearing. Any protest with respect .to a decision of the Zoning Administrator against the moving of a building or structure shall be in writing, signed by one or more persons owning real property within three hundred (300) feet of the relocation to which it is proposed such building or 12/89 17.28. 100 - 17.28.130(b) structure be moved, and filed in the Office of the City Clerk within the time specified on the moving notice card. (2975-12/88) The City Council shall hear such protest at its first regular meeting after the time for filing protests has expired. (764-4/60, 1244-8/66, 2431-7/80) 17.28. 110 Relocation permit--Bond required. (a) No relocation permit shall be issued unless the applicant has first posted a cash bond. (2975-12/88) (b) The bond shall , in form joint and several , name the City of Huntington Beach as obligee, and shall be in an amount equal to the cost, plus fifty (50%) percent of the work required to be done, in order to comply with all of the conditions of such relocation permit as estimated by the building official . (c) No bond, however, need be posted in any case where the building official shall determine that the only relocation involved is that of moving a building temporarily to a regularly occupied business premises of a house mover or that of moving a building to adjacent property of the same owner; but the exceptions herein made shall not apply unless the building official finds that no such security is necessary in order to assure compliance with the requirements of this section. (764-4/60, 1244-8/66, 2431-7/80) 17,28.120 Bond conditions. Every bond posted pursuant to this section -� shall be conditioned. (a) That each and all of the- terms and conditions of the relocation permit shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the building official . (b) That all of the work required to be done pursuant to the conditions of the relocation permit shall be fully performed and completed within the time specified in the relocation permit.; or if no time is specified, within ninety (90) days after the relocation permit is issued. The time specified in any permit may be extended for good and sufficient cause by the building official . No such extension of time shall be valid unless in writing, and no such extension shall release any surety from any bond. (764-4/60, 2431-7/80) 17.28.130 Default in performance of conditions--Notice given. (a) Whenever the building official shall find that a default has occurred in the performance of any term or condition of any permit, written notice thereof. s.hall be given to the principal. (b) Such notices shall specify the work to be done, the estimated cost thereof, and the period of time deemed by the building official to be reasonably necessary for the completion of such work. 12/89 17.28.130(c) - 17.28. 190 (c) After receipt of such notice the owner shall cause the required work to be performed or failing therein, the building official shall then proceed forthwith to cause the required work to be performed and completed. All costs incurred shall be paid out of the aforementioned cash bond. No liability shall be incurred therein other than for the expenditure of the sum in hand therefor. (764-4/60, 1244-8/66, 2431-7/80) 17.28.140 Cash bond--Manner of enforcement. If a cash bond has been posted, notice of default, as provided above, shall be given to the principal , and if compliance is not obtained within the time specified, the building official , in his discretion, shall proceed without delay and without further notice of proceedings whatever to use the cash deposit or any portion of such deposit to cause the required work to be done by contract or otherwise. The balance, if any, of such cash deposit shall , upon completion of the work, be returned to the depositor or his successor or assigns, after deducting the cost of the work plus twenty-five (25%) percent thereof. (764-4/60, 2431-7/80) 17.28. 150 QPtion to demolish building. When any default has occurred on the part of the principal under the preceding provisions, the building official shall have the option, in lieu of completing the work required, of demolishing the building or structure and clearing, cleaning and restoring the site. (764-4/60, 1244-8//66, 2431-7/80) _ 17.28.160 Bond--Period and termination. The term of each bond posted, pursuant to this section, shall terminate upon the completion to the satisfaction of the building official of the performance of all the terms and conditions of the relocation permit. Such completion shall be evidenced by a statement thereof, signed by the building official , a copy of which shall be sent to any principal upon request. When a cash bond has been posted, the cash shall be returned to the depositor or to his successors or assigns upon the termination of the bond, except any portion thereof that may have been used or deducted as elsewhere in this chapter provided. (764-4/60, 1244-8/66, 2431-7/80) 17.28.170 Entry upQn premises. The building official and his duly authorized representatives shall have access to the premises described in the relocation permit for the purpose of inspecting the progress of the work. (1244-8/66, 2431-7/80) 17.28.180 Default--ComnletiQn of work by City. In the event of any default in the performance of any term or condition of the relocation permit, the building official or his authorized representative shall have the right to go upon the premises to complete the required work or to remove or demolish the building or structure. (1244-8/66, 2431-7/80) 17.28. 190 Interference with completion by City. It is unlawful for the owner or his representative, successors or assigns, or any other person, to interfere with or obstruct the ingress or egress to or from any such premises of the City of Huntington Beach, engaged in the work of completing, demolishing or removing any building or structure for which a relocation j 12/89 17.28. 190 - 17.28.200 permit has been issued after default has occurred in the performance of the terms or conditions thereof. (764-4/60, 1244-8/66, 2431-7/80) 17.28.200 Relocation permits—Exception. The provisions of this chapter relating to the posting of bonds shall not apply where the building or structure is to be moved to a location outside the City limits. In such cases , if the building official finds that the building or structure is so constructed and in such condition that it can be moved with safety, the permit shall be issued without the requirement of a bond. (764-4/60, 1244-8/66, 2431-7/80) 12/89