Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Variance 453 - E.C. Cunningham and N.D. Cash - 4 Unit Ap (PubUshed Huntington Beach News July ` S, 1%2) ' UGAL NOTICE t Pons or muc xzmm AT NO. 463 NOTICE It HETWIY GYM that a pub- lie hooting will be bold by the Cur Planning Commission of the City of Runt- lagton Beach la the Council Chamber of , tho City Hall, Huntington Beach. Cull- . foralu, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock P.M., on Tuosday, the 17th daT of July. IM. for the purpose of considering a petition for an Area Variance to regulations of tLe Districting Ordinance. To allow the ccastruction of a Your ' unit apartment to encroach 2S It. Into the required 60 It, side Yard nothack measured from centotlins and to allow concrete patios, fences avid stairways to encroach Into the re- quired side yard setback in the 21-3 . Limited Multiple Family Residence , District. Located at the northw►ool cornet of Atlanta Avenue and Must. ington Street, and legally described as Lot No. 1, Bloch 102, Vista Del Mort Tract.All Interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their ' opinione for or against gmatiay the proposed Area Variance requested bT said petition. Further Information may be obtained from the of fico of the 9e0e1=7 to the - Pfawning commission. DATED this Sth day of July, 1962. CITY PLANT N0 COMMISSION, � W. C. WAllnX .�.� ib�` .r l,t},;, la . '�11 ��*1.---,._ '`�� .' .`1 .' �I�f •�;r ` nTa��;.*, �- F'tr/ �;{r AL 3. 1 Y r � 1 r v , .l y`/`� t 1 ' 1 1, ,.r�,y �� `':°�'�11•.�I, �iYu sr �lr I�y' ...Jr/ �- �w 4` 1_'.+ �,Y S� `'.,. • d, . '1111''.1 „ '• 1 �y' a' ;'�� .' J f�i ' r�,' yllA 1�•� '.. �', ly,••R? .�� .ir 1 1 lI�K70a[T, COCNMAN • AIiC![11.O�i RE IV I D 402 FMST 114S. M NMM so SANT^ ANA. CALIVORMA CI'f`f Irl NUN1'iNi'r1C��! of 'CH I �! � KIM�sw.� A•7��1 ' Jill 2 41%2 j 5 I) Alwrnen for 71 s tat 1 i 6 i 7 1 ` M PLAM11 NO co%misrox CITY OF HUNTIMITION BRACH, 3TATF: OF CALVORhIA 1 101 11 rn the Matter of the Petition ? For Conditional ::xception ( Use ) tTY No. 453 (� , 1?. Variance ) ! ,, 13 of ) NOTICE 41P APPFAL TO ciTY COUNCIL 14 F. C. CUNNINGHAM und N. O. CASH, j � 1 � 15 Petitioners . 1 � 16 3.7 ( Novi cnmc ?. C . Cunningham and ?,. '). CNnh and ap -pal to toe City � F 18 Council of the Ctr3 of Eluntington Bosch froze the dociaian, if enr, 19 �� of the Planning Commission of said Ci'y upon the above rs,'ttoor at its 20 neet inF ha lc! at 7: 0 F . M. c+r. Jul v 170 196P, &nd hereby give notice 21 of such spree! . 22 ' "'het the setion taken by saule Planning Corw-issieh wall of l 23 sttI 1 own : 24 �( This mutter wag celled before the Comminsion and Planni" 25 Officer, Willis Warner, reed a report from the Commissions• Staff, a ' 26 copy of which was filed with the Commission and Is hereby reforred 271, to for further particulars . �1he sleet! was opined for public dis- f, P � 28 oussion and T.. .k'. Blodgett attorney for retitionere, tollowd br 29 ' Polsen, •ddressod thw Comiision. The ewettlg 'yes 30 thereupon closed to p1;bIle dtrcassion, and further dissnselel► and I 31 ellsitation of foots was had fry the m ube:ro of the OOM1691en; 33 a 00Mlnslawr moved tit the potiilow bo denied , err bebM a 1 ..G4.:er ..c , t i. .. t e . .Y L P..,:.«..,r f..it►,ii'h�1a� rruid�ill!.i,_y . . ,ry 1 r:o e90011d to the motion, the mum" won daclarnd lost . Thereupon 2 another Co,mMIR9l onar nrv&d thut th . appl i :• ticn he grunted . This 3 motion wor, rvc (-rri,!d by, N t.hlr-? ein'! , 1%n asl.l for u vote 4 threo manbern voted in favrr•' or the mot i on and two voted sa:�ainst it 5 with t:he sixth m-)n er -orrialninp, fro;r, voting. Tho (:hairmxn deelars 6f thtit ht. rr--al ! not r•nfra in, failt :innt; vc;t!� ; where apon, the sixth 7� metnLra:' �fQ� t' (� ti u ! r.: � :If' :'1r1t t 1^1' , � :'f•u : r:i' ' f f rote -if thrf !e. "far" t 8 anJ t:hrot- " fsi7aIr, i i1 ,, c r t•!i?, & I) '0"A)l ;,h • cr.0 • 9. Tl:u '• �hr :'t',u; rtirr ' } !:r ' : '.rl' ulF­ ^oti on lost 810 no 10� furthf,i at,t on r^ ti f"Lov.. � 1 13. 3.21 Mr c-rran'�n I r: ? •i; *1:i :iW O, ?, t 3 tiono.: .q doern themselve n 13t1 Uyj';rievnd liv t►.r. rr Ur f�lln:fr s 1 14 J "A".1,1 A Ari,1 I c t, or f r,- ;r_,r ?it' i nna'L' i on in 'to pirrr.it the 15 ' con-,troction of :r,ry roar F.ingle,- r7urogw ,11 16i, attaoher± , ur,n 4 1 0 - root nt,: buc, 'rnn Lhe rut+rrt Uoundary of l7 '. t: �eta „n ►1�, Itroot. 181� I,-z ,-..Ai ttr 1 .r,�- .J• ti + f1 r! :jr:- _ e0 at Lot I of Block 10,� v s `.ii 7f• L tt'iI' Tva(c 0 n !� i}teZ' SdSt}l t.�i'� ddJaL'!•it* Lot P . 20` Lot I (if the:t- -. otn ti14j 'i 1 -7 -1" i":'ont:itty nn :'Itianta !itroet, with a f 211 �7-r� rt"1!l� da�: :ir'; i' rn lr"rrrt -r, "~:- ,'. F , Jlt� lot ~ lies aiAr lido 22 231 Ttte pre::;cnt 1 t n, n ( nc'r. . "97.18 of Han!"ington 24 , Bo�icYc Crd!nanz:) 1. _ ! ure ;, , f t t ,"rr, th^ at nter 13 ne of Atlanta 251 5truPt. or ?, f. tt °ro�-i tho bouna:ir•- lino of Atiatnta . MUD 26 ' 30-foot hot-bac frcm tht= with a 5-ft . rear or 27 -)prsite xid(j sat-hvsc;:, lE,avfj:: t. Taft by 1�17 foot on :at P. upon 28 which tn build a a true t•.iro and' prohibits iiny building Ulhatecarst .29 on said lot 1 . The result of sash set-bask .inc+s is to pro)t;t , it 30 tho isruance of a building rrrnit upon any portion of tho set-back 31 arsa and prohibits any building �herern. 32 That *xeeptional c4rou►ms torte aa n11i canditioaa exlet with ■rrfa.arw�fw . �• ` '• ��. �t .y 'ff� • t J1 ��i`,: •d t':�Jii :�'�'iT'' ~�•l'�'k1�`��r �.- 'eM . ,..�-,.r�4 �", t r4 �r , �7� ..r� .':'•� 1�f,• rf rJ 1 . rywi`',',' A•ry �y`'•. f. •'i �.�'fi�/if , .1, �]�,:•.F.....� I1 '' y . wstio6e '' L.r• it 1►.r a _,N,+t, Qh ...�ra"i, t..3r4•f +,,, i ,, I relation to this prcj�erty and the intc,r-Aec: ueu thereof k:,.ich do not 2, apply genarslly to ether property ii: tho n4oige district , ir1 thins 31 Th& t to! ! praz,aisty In the aa:uu hl oc i.. tron ti g c;, Atlanta 41 Street , ",liol- Char, this property, !a novi improve: wi ' ti duelling 5' thousson which or - nct :ie9t bacil: ajt,t ciiatat;c�., of, b,) ft . a;1d thR housas 6: �croaa a� tlnr,. an tY�G t , :rc,r.tir;: o:i :'. t ! JArA(A :t.rOot ere not sat ? I bac� 60 ft. W Ttl:, t. tr.ia . lnr ­ tho uaC of Lot 1 91 p1,A1 r.r, teriwl : : +E. t.x c;�� l� �� :. �t " , �r.� u cendiLa.onal excnptirr 10 I, nec=;7sury Ic:'r the F. r�:s<:rfyticn �,n, on jcly•r.rur.t of thu auhstartial 111 pr r t y r c tior..:r r . 12 ± i �-r+� itn r 4' a 11 not �ti c2Yt.l�n A10 13+( d e t ntu1 }O ti(1 1_' 11C 1-:jIL'Ti , saff :Y wrl.e, -. !n1farc. nor in'ur!ous i lA I; t o `.h� ^e) o m: :�V fr �.: ;- , i i,,%I ; i-n ; r, : -,r ± - r em n t:ent .; ihe no Lghborhoc I 1J r 1 I cI t h L 5 �)rorer•ty f ^: L. r :.i on t'lu ` :410, n,tlier ;,.^,irtf I rio,e Ift- }'12nVad by t : a .art ^t7nC .. . ins which has Sa'Y17 17 ustiblished by frv•rcN : ,, boil . , tc• wit , ; ;, foct from tho 18 I -pi snout 'aauridurc of 19 hat sbic: -int-buci: 11rx cs : 11:ih rcu a t C.7 f a e t is rd+aitt ly 20 co cstabliahad to th4t it sorr;;: time .itlar,ta Straot may be 21 } widened to h N1 ti: ()1 i ) -' c t inn ;:hc _'i Ly , upon iA future bmintnt 22 ; domrj =i proctuding, ki ! .L bt.: able to ac:+luiru thir nub jctct proptrty for 23! .dais valufu thor. U-1c s;A;ec. :acu. .l ha u It sal.' a;.t-Cycu had not been 4 24 j eatablishod , .r. i of .ir:' Lhc impeoveme3nt or 25 ! develr rrj_- '' of the. a:1-' ;c +. t ,: ru': � rGy fcr t*,%L r E. iorpose . 261 1 Thst suc% set-Loci, rt_;ulstlon is intended to send was •dc,pt•ed 271 to destroy or d6preci4tc tilt vuluc a the aut loct property •o that 28 st soave future undetFrminod tine. the City of Huntington Deeoh might 29 acquire the same for s small value and , in the moontiwe , prevent the 30 owners thersof from deri.vir;g any income thorelrom without the City 31f iu any &A nei, being bound to require sold 10'?-facet right of ray or 3,2 to per the artuuers thereof therefor . 1r• ',� A �'�� ::.. � a ,.r r :i •�• 'r r .'�,� +����,y, �; y•��'yi FyvY•'•� r ++ ' ��}�� �l .rl, � �+� y' ArV{ � j� .{' � :i 1 �. �� �+ alp. i����•� �� ..R�� j� A � �+i++`: r-� '' `r• � + � •+ Wl am .'�+._t°k _`•S�� � ',,( ; .I�1 ryirtti'l `�,'.+�!�l Ar, r'TLm�:'�tiY�tiy'.•,'..]�. 'r i" _._ y:i•+�1.•.�' �6r '.•, �.,SL�i1[1F`�ll'•� y l.�FiS'1.L�. _.i4' vldi�r����d5�t.+�� 1 Roforence is -,wdc tr, tht Petition fc,r Condit!onal icoftion, 2 the rc poil~ cif th St--oft of Palo, 'n:1-11 r-01ioii, thf, maps ov plats of the 3 i i�n�a�g.ts� �;",'r�:ti 1':r." t1t ti,r: -.'_-1.1t r n of t',ho- i': - vriing, Comidamim. anti wny 4 and .911 documc-r.t; ,v on files with this Plarmir.,, --o-.^,ission, all. of which 5� are here3b� inem-pmrdted h. -x,-•irl fey- reftivi,-m-: to tlhr� awmc, affect as 71 'ii';��. ,,�,��', + t.i t < < a�.;z ! rti !�� '. n r—rorwbi. a City Council. 1 8; : ant. tilt r� '"1+. ')' I t: CT: � :.�s� Cl:l' �. �' f l.�iw.la�I I ? Zt► the �,1 au- J. -, 1 g±II 7. t. ri f , f raim-iAAlt; it - 1O 5� 6i+i•'7( T1t tiJi � t: L 5 '�= -�)i: �' ', . '_r'' C : _ � _.F. t vx-' . V e jrpvent: bo4indary I� 11 I % f A t I a r t6 3tr .,< ,. . r: t _r 1 v _ thi.. caf . + + 12 13 /�.��vAAt���77�r s1i: 14 . I iiv L . ' '. g3tODOZT 151 i s K:"1111.T .,F'. o F M cs J gtt t , uoc .ra n 16 , Anderacn, their attcrneyt � 17 ` 18 ' 19 �� I 201 i 21 , I 22 24 25 26 271 281 4 29 11 30! 311 I 321 0. ' I � • A M 1�u,.1: y I I JY s• ^�,11, �� A A_r j�j�j f ��s y � � -:�f Ij� �•} � � r' monk, t �l.'r '�`"4T ti ,�u I�'� � l '�� + >•i}.r .C�� '7�i.'P'��� ,� �.�. r � �'''+�,� ,;,,• � �c,� ��}mayy p��y� ���• :��'�. "'��. .. .; � �! .. _.. . `'.J: .�.. ;.'. "'�+i�'�•.�!"tea il['•!'.y.ti J.�fli+ie.i'•. .� !iS•�r;� N �y-. ? �•a4, , 1'S:�',w?;.:,'��.. Huntington Beach Planning Commission P. U. floe 1W City lull lluntinLton Dearh, California September 4 , 1962 Honorable Mayor and City Cenci [ City Hall Huntington Reach, California Gentlemen: On July 17 , 1962 , a Planning Commission held a public hearing on, AV #453 led by E . C. Cunningham and U. D. Cash concerning proper -y, at the norr_hwest corner of Atlanta Avenue and Huntington Street . The request Is to waive the setback from Atlanta Avenue in order to construct a 4-unit apartment building , At the Commission hearing , the attorney for the applicant and the building contractor spoke in behalf of the request and ►:here were no protests . After a lengthy discussion by the Corixnission, Coarnissioner Bazi.l moved that the application be approved with a setback of 53 feet from the centerline of Atlanta. This would result in a 3 ft side yard after Atlanta is completely widened . the motion was lost for wane of a second . Thereupon, Commis- sioner Letson moved , second by Miller, to approve AV #4 53 as requested . the motion was lost by a tie vote of 3 to 3 with Chairman Stang being absent . A Copy of the Staff Report to the Co „ fission is attached for your information which sets out in greaser detail the problems Involved in the request . L•kespect:ully submitted , W. C . Warner Secretary wCMi: 1 b Encl: Staff Report r July 17, L962 S T A F F R f Y 0 ? 'f Area Variance : AV #453 E . C. cunn inclicm This is a case which ie somewhat unique but which w13.1 prob b,'.y erase in several other p l acee during the coming y ears . The act ion to be taken wa fseL will definitely establish a ratftern or poUcy f or similar situations . In this case there are 2 - 27 ft lo�.9 at the corner of a primary highway, Atlanta M,enue) and a IQcal ©trcryt ( luuntingLen Street ) , n. a lots front on Huntington ens' side onto At lasts . For residential use of this property, !:ha Ccde r. try+wires n setback of 60 feet from the centerline of �.t: lfnta . 50 fes►t frcm centerline being; for street purposez and 10 fen t i.or the exterior side yard . As a -result, after deducting the - t:rect wideni.n;► and both side and there +.s 19 fast loft for a bui ldln2 . rre applicant can-tends this is undue hardighip and that the setback constitutes taking; cf his property vl.chom cowp,2nsati.or.. • The Staff , of course , cannot ogres since th- City is not t:,sicirg arty of the property. .0 the setback f rc„i AtlrnLo 1.3 unl.cvful or unconstitutional ; then, it secrrs , U.-O sr3m:! would apply to �-l.l front , side , and rear set backs requi rrd on Chin propart: Oand every other lot in t:cwn. nern is no de,'7r'_var_ i on of the use and enjoyment of the exterior side yard of Clio property re it iF still quite useble by the owner for s:.asc nnyt:hing except a bullding. It: may wall be that: the cnpli cant: cannot put just what he %,-ants on the lots , but this -.'C tAU11Y is not n t;ttiu3u,-Jl happenstance. As to bruins 19 feet of the le:: to build upon, there Are a great many logs in thv City r;hich have a maximum of 19 feet of Space for a b;aild:irg . The applicant has suggested that bcLt•hen Lake and Huntington Streets, Atlanta could be widened , all on the south side where Cho land is vactnt . Thie3, it seems , would not be fair to that ourner and probably the City would have to purchase the extra right-of-way. That Cost might not be very green: , but on the other hand , why should carpayere monay be expended in this way to enhance the value of the applicant ' s property? The Staff has also discussed the possibility of reducing the Classific ti.ott of Atlanta, between Lake and Highway 39, to a secondary hl.gltway rather than a primazp. This ww1d ba for an 80 foot street xathor than 100 foot , which ma=s that-, ally 10 f"t of widening would apply to the subject: property instiod r 0 Staff Report Area Variance #45.1 - Contirrued of 20 feet , Thia possl: i.lity i_ very quiniticr::zble ,Then cons.Uleri-r.,, the anticloated future treti f is volsx.mes cn At i r-rnt: a And for t:h* present canner: be re co,r.-r.cnde d . The request , tie prevented by t:ie applicant , cannot be by the Scaft .as ti� f;;el this c,.n. uld c dvfe;:tt1r.3 t hc: pnrpoc.- F Tanning for the fvxure of the Cis, y. I'h�� C'r�:; i ,�;acn r:ny 1owever, that in this particuLir - -;c , _tip rc -1��.ie:::.:! .; C•lu�. j t ; modified to noui.s degr e. If such is t ho c:r_:!t: , 4:1'.c. S%t r. f f :,:-10 strongly suggest that no setbacL of Ic than 53 rent: from centerline r_or any bui.Ic3i.np „c:.:r.-:� c. r.l: .. ,:rc,pr'i•ty ��- considered, Tnir, voulld ro.ult in i iut ur: 3 fo-) : tr i.:.to, Y..zv i Atlanta Avenuen is wi:lem-3 .