Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Variance 529 - Wintersburg Community Methodist Church -(P+wlished Huntington Beach ?bows Fob' 21; `1963) LEGAL NOTICE -` , XOTICE OF PUBi.IC ausixG ' I UV He. 529 NOTICE IS HEREBY GWEN- dhat a pub- lic hearing will be held by the City Platt. .'aing. _ Commission of Ore Clf,� of Hunt a ..' in7ton: Beach do the Council Chamber of 4hn City Hall, Huntington Beach. Cerlif- -''-ernia, at -the Imur of 7:3G o'clock- P.M., on Tuesday, the Stb dal of March, 796.`!. for the pu..-pose cf considering a petition for . a Use variance to regulations of the Disirlating Ordinance as adopted by Interim OttdinanceWo 668. aliaW the crostructicn of a Church and rsta3ed IaWlties in th,& A=l-X Gwwrul-lyricultured Dlstrlct. Located appraximately 660 it mut of £!award* Street and south of Hall - Avenue and legally described as 3y, acres of the NW ccrzor of the E % of •the NW -1l4 Qf th* SE 1/4 of Sectian 22-5-11. Further l*W1-dascrlp- Uon on file in the Planning Depart mart Office. 1 inkerestcd poisons are invited to mend said, hearing and express their opinions lot -. or against , granUng the pro- ;Wned Us• Variance requested. by said petitiao. further in:on=tloa may be obtained L-Om ..the- oUioe of the Secretary to the plaza,lno _ t,omsaissina, DA W8 " .21tt day o1 February, '1963. CITY PLANNING' COUMiSSIOM . By W. C. WARNER . Secretary t ,.. i r ._...-......i,..:rre.n...a.�.-.•.�w�t,e.sw.�rxs.,�an..,.....:.�.w..- � ' . _ ��,i•.ra y x.ea-e...- r ,f.: wit r t«.: ,1•.. •,� rv•_. ♦.....� w.. a .. ? t .•.. >• ..f -• r. w` .^" .M { L•y...i t T.a t � .t t wr.. •. er { . 4...•• �• ." .•� 5J+J3. i. t ':.ls �i,�.yu t .aCt { t .. ras.e.%t i � �� j..r .v.t t.... ri ,-- . t' ,t..tsr.Is..•,,,a.,r�'.G.:!'�./ .,.;y�.t�. �rY�".��. � :�.a. fit. .r•. « ,... "I.,t�+ p t la„T- 'M� )r.. 1r~+t �iw., _,r..��a � � • +..�... � j��� � y t {,, HURCH )TETHODIS, w.��.....+... rw..+wr«....»t»i..w++.w.»......v.......r.+..i.......r».w..............v....+� • ...... .r+�..+J_... ...�.-..............w• d-:..... f.� « .-....-....a M...... �w..Lw..�a............... 7386 WARNER AVE thiUE • HU N T I N G 7 0 N U E A C HO CAtIF0Rt4I A nr. Paul Jones City Clerk Huntington Beach, California Dear Yr. Jones: Roger G., $titwoith, Mtinister 7e1C�ho . C�y_7-l6,6 4°v.qCL1r December 30, 1464 n . G►'rt ,�c,S _f r I am vwiting concerning the possibility of extending our variance, number 4w. concerning which 1 believe Mr. Oscar StrizklSn has spoken with you. 'ife are enmeshed in an unfortunate circumstance, in which your help and that of the plannina conmi,sion and the council will be greatly appreciated. As you know, we received the variance on our now property in March of 1963. We had hoped to begin construction as soon as our architect completed mir working drawings, but we were unable to secure a good sale on our present property, the income fron vrhich was necessary for construction of our new church,. Finally wa were able to sell bur property to the Baptist Church, and he have agreed to move within a year from the close of escrow. Also,, our enforced delay -'+as reused a serious overgrowding problem, especially in our church school and .parking facilities. But at last the property is sold, the plans caeple*ad, the bids advertised and the contract has been signed with the builder, bla,. J. Poluso of Newport Beach. tie Are, ready in every respect to begin our long awaited church. But during this protracted effort of ours. in JuAn 19a3, three months aftcr the granting of our variance, the City Council passed an ordinance stating that all variances should expire one year from their issuance date. Yr'hat public notice of the ordinance there right have been escaped our notice and we. were not, infortaed by the.C.1ty of this change. V%hen our builder applied for a building permit he was notified our variance had.expired and that ha would have to Institute the normal proceedings for the.issuence of a new variance. This delay would seriously trouble,• our contractor and his subcontractors, as he has. already ordered much ofthe material. It would be' disadvantauecus ,.ta ue in that it V?0Uld furthrer',del, ay our but lding, es- calate our building costs, intensify aIT prublemg of ovexg owdingi and do.lay. the building of a church tha- can adequately serve the northern portion,,of our city; Yu conclus ion, . we feel' if the delay can. Ue, avol,de+d by the Continence of our v�ar3enco)= r both we as :the church and the city as a<' »!dole stand to 4enefit by this actlon. 'r a Sinc�eral�, y trs. .y „:--� , r�ti�.74 �.yr t ,J ., 5 ,t 1 � ,+ '�•y�_".+� M;�Y �'x'' , * � tkps' idfiiiistlsr ;r.,+.r17a11��31RX:.�•8�li.Idlrtg