Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Variance 529 - Wintersburg Community Methodist Church - (9)1 ' ' (Ft4WIalsod Huntington Beach flaws Fob. 21.-1963) LZGAL 1cma 1Kor= or PUMC NZAXMG mr 3106 S ,::rTXCi IS REMY GIVEN tbcd a Pub- lic hel=irg will be held by the CiIT Plan- . ping Contalseion of rho City of Hunt- �! ' Dion Beaob fn the Council Chamber of the City Hall, Huntington Boacb, CaIU- omla, at the hoes of 7:30 o'clock P.M., on Tuesday. the Sth day of March, 1963, for the purpose of comidoring a Qetitlon tar a Uso Variamco to teguiationa of the Districting Orbs to adopted by Ialeri Ordlnance No 696. o allow the caceRructios Of a Cbusch and rrlaled facUlUes in *9 A-1-X Goneml AgrimAturcd District. i oamtsd approxInKdely bin It oast of Edwraide Shrel and mouth of Hell - X"mue and legally deecribed cis 31A acres of the NW mraec of rho E % of the KW -1% of the SE W *I SOelioa 22-S-11. Further isgal des=ip- tion on file in ilre Manning Depart- �_aao! Oltic'a. ]]iilllt ititsreslsd peso we invited to ahead said hearing and ospresa their oyinims Ins of againet granting the pro- posed Use Vadamcw rogueeN+d -by *Wd petition. Turikes isiora am mar be ob6ainod ff ibe olfioo of the SoatolmT to the FIaw Commiseiara. DATED We 21W d ri of FeWuwy. 'IM. CIlT PLANNING COMMISSION, Sly W. C. WARIER SocrslarT %ii�i N1NTERSOURG COMIIJNTTY W7110DIST CHURCH Huntington Beach, California March 15, 1963 MI Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Huntington Bench, calirornin Gentlemen: We hereby appeal Condition n 3 requiring dedication and full improvement to City Standards of the northerly ex- tension of Abbott Drive to Heil Avenue, as imposed by the Huntington Beach Planning Consission in the granting of Use Variance # 529. Very truly yours, Wintersburj� Co!munity Methodist Church (ita/Rr.r�_na_n_,_ of Trustees 17292 Goldenwast Street Huntington Beach, California r COMMUNITY METHORTS1' CH RCH' . f '� i s,_►�! A�•.�a, 04 �,yY•�a,'� '1 }'i'ay. ,, ? •'r,t i.'f5,...�. �i �+7 : 1 j�'n'�l�n�Ya t7 �� ' 7386 WAR N E R AV E N U E a HUN1I rr1G TC N 8E AC H, CA E I F 0 R N I Pcyer G. Bet&worth, Min4ler lelepho :847.7766 N. Get• December 30, 1964 ,D �Y Ct"E� C'ctV t90 Mr. Paul Jones "� c's:.r City Clerk Huntington Beach, California (I , Dear M.r. Jones: s-s 5 I am writing concerning the possibility of extending our variance, r4mber 4Af, concerning shich I believe Mr. Cscar Stri ckli n has spoken with ycj. We are enmeshed in an unfortunate circumstance, in which your help and that o". the planning commission and the council will be greatly appreciated. As you know, we received the variance on our new property in Mara of 1953.' We had hoped to begin construction as soon as our architect completed our working drawings, but we were unable to secure a good sale on our present property, the income from which was necessary fem construction of our nee church. Finally we were able to sell our property to the Baptist Church, and we have agreed to move within a year from the close of escrow. Also, our enforced delay has cI+used a serious over,Qrowding problem, especially in our church school and parking facilities. But at last the property is sold, the plrns co4rrleted, the bids advertised and Of-' contract has been signed with the builder, Mir. J. Peluso of kerg:.nrt Peach. We are ready in every respect to begin our long awaited church. But during this protracted effort of ours, in June 1g63, three months after the granting of our variance, the City Council sassed an ordinance stating that all variances should expire one year from their issuance date. What publ c notice of the ordinance there might have keen escaped our notice and we were not c�tnd by the City of this change. When our builder applied for a Evilding permit he was notified our variance had expired and that he would have to institute the norml proceedings for the issuance of a new variance. This delay would seriously trouble our contractor and his subcontractors:,, at! ;:e has a'ready ordered much of t;ts material. It would be disadvantageous to us in that it would further delay ous;'-ulldinq, es- calate our building costs, intensify our problems of overgrowding, and delay the building of a church that can adequately serve the northirn portion of our city. In conclusion, we feel if the delay can be avoided by the cant'lagpance of our varisnca, Loth we as the church and the city as a whole stand to benetit tr'f this action. sincere r, ate. Minister