HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Variance 537 - Salem Development Company - No LocationHEINLY, HEWETT, RICKLES L HE1NLY
ATTOR"Itys AT LAW
DAUL 11. fl[IMLT •�, w��f RIOMtN �r�R=T
A04p>,o o. ntwRST SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA
A069 1 , C. 141caLue
{ NAADI.D t. 04t116LI fR►r►wDwe say-06fI
1 . fPAhn L. cdtl[hf. jR.
Jo1iNAA TUQ�[A . �. Jude 20, 1063
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
City Ball
Huntington Beach, California.
Re; Appeal of Planning Commission Decision
on Use Variance Into. 537
Gentlemen;
Please be advised this office represents Salem Development Co., the
applicant in Use Variance No. 537 which was disapproved by the
x Planning Commission on June 18, 1963.
On beholf of Salem Development Co. we do hereby appeal the decision
of the Planning Commiesion,a
Your co-operation in this matter is appreciated.
DHH vp
cc Clerk of the Council
cc Planning Deepartment
Very truly your ,
4
Dale H. Heinly
""� D
CnY of HUKTINi MN IGAC"
JUN2 01963 .'
ly
'f�lf
0 ,r
L]
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
P. o. Box 190
City Hall
Huntlaawn Beach, Califomia
July 1, 3.963
City Council
City Nell
Huntington Beach, California
Re: Appeul of QP #537, Salem Development Co
Gentlemen:
At the adjourned Planning Co=iaeion meeting held June
25, 1963, there was a lengthy discussion regarding the
action of the Commission on the subject variance. It
was felt by some members of the Commission that there
was an incorrect vote on the matter by the Conmiesioa.
One member stated that he did vote the opposite to the
war he had intended.
Therefore, by majority vote the Commisvion requests
that the matter be referred back to thom for further
consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
W. C. Warner
Planning Director and Secretary
v