Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Variance 67-24 - Huntington Harbour Corporation - Reside S. Views 131 vu qtJ pubt�err "�f}skis , V.city ':.a�irtd�.•0. '� �a ur�Ongton aach. n,i t _e �? hitntii ;=at:',;thl + civic i�Ccnt r iuh IV,�esch `cPIlf Omits; at its p CPU. �f after',"a� �a }tsiia;to�ajMonday, .jhe. rQl'. • day' of ;•Jul9, 1-19417,; toratte �pu_rpose _onsJdertnt.'rn:jspp ki.;to,'the, approvvv ! In {port','crr;Used adanc`e ,67 24 tiff thei, city'•Plannini-Commission; rela;44e '16 fPing jof tvtSentati, '��5�=,..�A�•: y�►+_ -ilia-,!Jse Va!fancZAtsat:racoct"%" '�i ed;=oY{,then ngi;GQ�missionIV,L�y,�f de�lQtQpinent i ofi.I'i a' To 6405,E as_; fot~•a ' 14 SOWS:�th- 2�/•l ���?','��'� 2 r�" J-�; � a� l fA}I ..•,vYu ►, .., }i` lot 'ha�rrr,i: ►, min Imum,..4 tlLUtVr v SCin Ovj with; :._gs 6. 3. AttW�10 ,. fro.tit, ird selfi��Iis: ;i aT, f �� :rShayidir�c:a ,en 24. trahc or '.tli rtink,streeL •i Humboldt-Dtive.�northerly:arta Ost-. ;f • Hart�our;:pras�ntly;,aaned RL:Single Family:'-=Residence1-iblstrict:'+`'I~egal • ; nisi$ 'Department.;• f:c�. '= :• All•`in4Q►ested Y piir�pns�t'arn;'irlvited -.to;t attend*sate. heaving;'a_ndl express their I'opiPiio ItJ ns for.`ar;ag inst"Wd:UseVarian'". Furth or. f� ati • i jritays.b4'.c4talned•� Y 4 • �:fromjthe,pOH� �thi!:City:. t ED.,;JurWi2.SJt''.1967 �.CITS ;OF,!hUNTINdTON,,BEACH { Sys PALIU.C;'JONES .: ,..,•: _,. ;� ��,'C+ty' Clerk--.- Huntingtonl • ��c�,� Planning �on�.niiss�an _ '0. 0. Pox 29CS Y or j' My Hall Huntln 4 Bcach Cattfomla June 19, 1367 L E T T E, R G P TRANSMITTAL r• rr w rr rr w �� ...n TO: HONORABLE MAYOR ATTD CITY COUNCIL FROM Planning Commission SLIB-JECT: Conditional Exception - UV #67-24 ATTENTION: Doyle hiller City Administrator Paul Jones q 6ity- Clerk Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the Planninrl Commi esion recommendation for approval of Use Variance No. 67_24. Applicant: Huntington Harbour Corp.. Location: Northwesterly of Humboldt Drive, appro:dm&tely 1300 ft. west of Saybrook 'Lane. UV Request : To permit subdivision and development of the property as indicated on tentative tract no. 6405 for single .family dwell.-- in s and api:�:rtenant: structures art f01low3z i (15 On waterfront lots with minimum areas of 5000, sq. ft. per lot and minimum, average widths of 50 rt. per lot. (2) On waterfront lots with a minimum ,`of 35 lineal feet of frontage for every lot. (3) Adjoining streets with minimuzi 50 ft. right—of-way widthe (no change in 40 ft. roadway widths ) except for a •52, ft. right--oX-way width for WVfarer Circle, enrl' a 55 ft. .riggh.t-of-way width for Carousel Lane add oining Lo t s 180--186 a ivalusi,ve. (4) Adjoining cul-de-sacs With, 45 Tts property line radii. Also the following ninimum setbacks: (2) 10 ft. , front yard aatbacks for A ellings I anal; 20 :ft. front' yard` setbacks. fai garagea. Navin diract.entraaces from the .atrele ,;'(2) 1 rt. r. Par .7&6vd eot;backh, 'end waiver raqul c.t .reuozit,s for �4Q © ft. ox 'open,: tf spare,: wi.thIn the roar r /7 'of Hach, I » I a R aeons y n ana is t �In. B 1. The proposed layout provides in general the same size or larger lot areas , lot widths, lot frontages , and street widths . 2 . The development criteria will be the same as on recorded tract 5481, but with more waterfront lots . 3 . There will be 12 less lots than the name area of the recorded tract, thereby decreasing the density. C P A �La,niu�.,�m�is s inn ct ion Approved and reconKaended for approval. by the City Council upon the following conditions : L . The minimum front yard setback shall be 10 €t. except the minimum setback for garagges entered directly from the street shall be' 22 f t . This ccrdttion of approval is not general in naMure and a Precise plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issu- ance of any building permits . Said plan shall delineate the house location on each lot. 2. There Sidewalks are constructed adjacent to the curb, A tree , equivalent to a 30 inch box tree, as approved by the Park Supervisor, shall be planted ' Ln the flout yt,rd of each lot and in the exterior side yard of each corner lot . 3. The rear yard setback on waterfront lots nay .be 10 fe. and the 900. sq . ft , of open space on waterfront lots rieed not be provided. 4 . Waterf ront lots shall be a mininrum of 5000 sq . f is in area with a minimum lot width of 50 ft . at the 20 ft . setback line. 5. Non-waterfront lots shall be averaged to meet the minimum lot requirements . 6. Street . widths shall be 'jis shown on the approved Teatative Tract Map No. ,,6405. J t . 1, y ' 1 1 I VOTE: AYES: Miller, Wo�rthy� Tom, Larkin, az-il, Royer, awson e NOES : None , ABSENT: None . Reg ectfull ubmitted P , Of I , K. A. Reynolds Secretary to the Planning Commission I` KAR/bd .; 1 i -ti „ r l 1(!S•b:' GIlriTltA�l I'I.AG1;, nusrtscrrox BEACH, CAI.IMnSIA TS1.. •I:JJ'tlfi:5.'3 11U1\TTING 1 O1'�I� HARBOUR , � :.. ff � �. . .,. TaLE June 14, 1967 (< <"! i' Honorable City Council CPA City of Huntington Beach c/o City Clerk 7 �'j---- Huntington Beach, California --'------,................•..���- - cIrr c:.rJtJt Gentlemen: Re: Appeal on Use Variance No. 67-24 On June 6, 1967, the City Planning Co; icsion considered and recommended approval, in part, of Use Variance No. 67-24. This use variance was filed by us in connection with the filing of Tentative Tract No. 6405. Said tentative tract was also approved by the Ccmmission on June 6, 1967. It comprises a resubdivisfon of the north portion of recorded Tract No. 3481 in Huntington Barbour. The purpose of the new map is to provide an improved design with additional waterfront lots, but with an over-all total of 12 less lots than presently exists under the recorded map. The use variance requested by us is necessary in order to implement design and construction of the improved layout shorn on Tentative Tract No. 6403 . Specifically we wish to appeal to you to approve the use variance items not recomended by the Commission which would permit development of Tract No . 6405: 1 . Allow waterfront lots having minimum average widths of 50 feet per lot (the C,.nm ission has recounaended that the 50-foot width be provided at the front se;.back line) . 2. Allow waterfront lots with a minimum of 35 pineal feet of frontage. for every lot (the Co=i:asion has i�ecomcnende 45 feet of frontage even for cul-de-sac lots) . 3. Allow .20-foot front yard setbacks for garages having direct ccitrances from the adjoining streets (the Co=Ission has held for a 22-foot front yard setback) . In support of our appeal, we wish to bring to your attention the following �� . .��.... pertinent facts: 1. The subject tract constitutes a proposed resubdiviaLon of s portion of recorded Tract No. 5481. The recorded asap contains numerous late having frontages of 30 'to 32 feet � at., the 46ds of the cul-de-sac .streeks. Our request. w�auld it Increase, the min fri�ntage� to, 35 `feet, thereby pro ding greater front• a _thAn, now exits but at' ,the 4"t tim6 P' 'o i -of.Ibis. at. the end :of cAch cip for..a reaso nable nuiabrr , ul de-voc': Honorable City Council Page 2 City of Huntington Beach June 14, 1967 2. Recorded Tract No. 5481 has a large percentage of lots which have an average width of 50 feet, but which do not have a Width of 50 feet at the front setback line. The new layout still Necessitates a design which permits an average 50-foot width in certain cases in order to effect an efficient and e9thetically beautiful design for the island fingers. However, we wish to again emphasize thhat the new design contains 12 less lots than the recorded map. This, we feel, furnishes a clear indication of our efforts to conform to the standards presently in fnrce in the City of Huntington Beach. The granting of our � appeal will simply allow us to develop the p_operty with a lesser density and a Scatter design titan will be the case if we develop the property under the design shown an the recorded map. 3. The 20-foot front yard setbacks requested under the use variance for garages have direct entrance from the adjoining streets and will simply permit the tots in the new tract to be developed with exactly the same front yard setbacks as the lots in recorded Tract No. 5481. We respectfully request youi approval of our appeal on the basis that Tentative Tract Map 6405 is a redesign of the recorded Tract 5481 and that the changes will benefit the City, the future homeowners and the corporation . Very truly yours, HUNTINGTON HARBOUR CORPORATION RDM:ec Richard D. Maitland enclosure - check _ r ( t 7 L r' r„: i.rf r:r t• F ?u(. ��C�+.rc7,R'Ll� L�,,.11li !t1� ff�ifr if �} y'f yl�f ,�}�?S', ,. ::., +f-r �!{"` ;'yam« •,rftµ` �. F .,.:;y r .2�`i..�art ,7J; ;,� t f' t.� � r •��` ,•,,•: .+' �,t i'�'d. �i� :r:.F."r •R'j t.•' r. .ryr �r y,��f•.. ��:i�.: �(r .,i� r�f,•�t( Tl ���. � .�. r, � .�i 1f li.. t .i�}�L L.f t. 3 .C � �.t` 1 !)� t 1. :t7 4. �r�F; f �` ,5 r7 RCS ( � , t i k�r •'fr i:.. ', •�,� t ., ,. a S••• r r, t !'�. �{ '-. .. .... .+•- 1tr� :•.l.r.,<.. CASH =ICIPT THE CITt Of HUYUJIMN BrACH CALLYONZA TIP=g WAA'l1= • Da to: Rec d rroa: 1 S Addseoa a it r+rr rain�� rrw�•� �wTwr.`+►%•� r or Or pr ( 'I . p - • ' CODE Accc t irk d % r , 1 r r � � r { � r P, V•ti ttor` 0 rr 7 Lr ,r r r '' 1�' f•�a ar car* ti1P 6 7-24 1zo ace C Muatington Harbour Corp 165+42 Chatham Place Huntington Beach, Cal Ocean View School Dist 7972 Warner Avenue Huutiosten Beach, Cal ,luntington. aeach High School District 1709 12th Stroet Buntinpon Broach, Cal state of California Sacrawat0 Californis Calm Graves 999 X. Sepulveda Blvd Suits 414 Z1 Segundo. Calif 90245 M. A. Cornell 16601 Carousal Lane Huntington leach, Cal : r '