Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Variance 67-24 - Huntington Harbour Corporation - Reside (8) • t � FriAl s City- '-" i?n t b}c .oti.th , Civic .':Cant cti,-CPlitoRiiso at Pad.. or•as.soort; RM•e+*+ aftit is•.' la,;40n' Monday, the ' ! 'dsy a1= Ju 3�7; for.." =purao`s TQ#A .ornstde:ins=an. _appeal to' tht arotNU�; in apart of llsa .Vjw3anc!-,67-24 by tla:.• City Planning 'Commission` e �• ,f link;ar r,�intauj�i',�T;ic!'. �� � Iiis' We'--yatimikii�aats;}dot•;Coco i ad;ley h*. Plsnpin6-Coi ltnission,_ ' -dw*wt lent' of.#I ;;W-`6051 •fOF`•� • �i lows• Sb = _ { -A • ; �- IAllow.-Ewa _ is t►a�e ns Y. 1 • min�raum f idi>7s �of350 vb;thlw 6 falst., of 3:` Al ;front. a s 1cs ;qi ' franc Nuet boldt,.Dclr►a•ncrUsrly and 4*st-- ,Ir Harbour, p"Mmtil; R2 Sirwe Family. -Residence,-4 ict• •!Nasal• - . . Plan- F�A 1 ning ;D�partfie it 4L. .t' All in?arested'Pis- are invited to attend ;'Sakt O�eriniL r 'c a=press their ' omions for ortaitainst;sai¢,Use Variance. Further 14rifarpull4rt.:I m 11 f to 04telped from'•IhW Office-of'the CHY:Clark: ` . U' tSATEJz June �LSy` +M7.'s ' ClIry OF HUNTIN%TGN -REACH 4 . W PAUL_C:`JOKES 7 ' ,, City Ckwk Huntington Bach Planning Commission r. a Ban 1W 10 of CUT Hall Hunting ton Beach, California June 19, 1967 L E T T E R O F T R A 11 S M I T T A L TO: HONORABLE i''iAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Conditional Exception -- UV #67-24 ATTENTION : Doyle Killer City Ldministrator Paul Jones , 81ty Clerk Gentlemen : Transmitted herewith is the Planning Commission recommendation for approval of. Urge Variance No. 67-24. Applicant: Huntington Harbour Corp. LocatioL: Northwesterly of Yamboldt Drive, approximately 130E ft. west of Snybrook Lane. UV Reaue_s„t_: To permit- ;subdivision and devolopment of the property as indicated on tentative tract no. 6405 for single family dwell- in s and appurtenant structures as follows : (15 On waterfront lots with minimum areas of 5000 sq. ft. per lot and minimum average widths of 50 ft. per let. (2) On waterfront lots with a minimum of 35 lineal feat of frontage for every lot. (3) Adjoining atreets with minimum 50 ft. right-of-way widths (no change in 40 ft. roadway widths) except for a 52 ft. right-of-way width for Wayfarer Circles and a 55 ft. ^ig t-of-way width for Carousel Lane adjoining Kota 180-186, inclusive . (4) Adjoining cult-de--sacs with 45 tte property line radii.. Also the following minimum setbacks; (1) 10 ft. front yard. setbacks for dwellings, and 20 ft. front yard setbacks for garages ha direct entrances from the street. (2 10 ft. ream yard setbacks, and waiver of the requirements for 900 0q. ft of open apace within the rear 2/3 of each lot., Re,UgnI GAVOD bv., nnl c,AL. (In Brig f) : 1 . The proposed layout provides in general the same size or larger lot areas , lot w'ldths , lot frontages , and street widths . 2 . The development criteria will be the same as on recorded tract 5481 , but with more waterfront- lots . 3 . There will be 12 less lots than thy_+ same are& of the recorded tract, thereby decreasing the density. Planning�.GQ=Lmstgn. Ac�tJQjg1: Approved and recommended for approval by the City Council upon the following conditions : 1. The minim. -m front yard setback shall be 10 ft. except the minimum setback for ge aragges entered directly from the street shall 2Z ft . This condition of approval is not general in nature and a precise plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to Issu- ance of any building permits . Said plan shalt delineate the house location on each lot . 2 . Where sidewalks are constructed adjacent to the curb, a tree, equivalent to a 30 inch Nm tree as approved by the Park Supervianr, shall be planted in the front yard of each lot and in the exterior side yard of each cnrner lot . 3 . The rear vard setback on wa terf rt,nt lots may be 10 f t . and the 900 sq . f t , of open apace on waterfront lots need not be provided . 4. Waterfront lots shall be a minimum of 5000 sq .ft, In area with a minimum lot width of 50 ft . at the 20 ft . setback line . 5. Non-waterfront lots shall be averaged to meet the minimum lot requir*ffants . 6 . Street widths shall be as shorn on the approved Tentative Tract Map No . 6405. -2- w v_2A: AYES: Miller, worthy Tom, Lorkin, Bazil, Royer, Lawson , NOES: None. ABSENT: None. RespectEull ubmitted , K. A. Reynolds Secretary to the Planning Commission KAR/bd -3- t I�IR 1L' l,u.:'tllA�l PLAI:s:, IM1411NOT N I11AC11, CALM ICKIA t'l:l- 431- 11AF. H UN,l,i NG"I ON FLAR BOUR I rL June 14, t967 r f 1�71 .�crat��•;:» Ill' c:I l � ;: i ticii. Honorable City Council City of Huntington Beach c/o City Clerk ••'- "�"�� "" Huntington Beach, Californib _......._ ....��-�r �-,� cart• c:�.rYt Gentlemen: Re: Appeal on Use Variance No. 67-24 On June 6, 1967 , the City Planning Comolasion considered and recomeended approval, in part, of Use Variance No. 67-24. This use variance Was filed by us in connection with the filing of Tentative Tract Nn. 6405. Said tent%Live tract was also approved by the Commission on June 6, 1967 . I: comprises a resubdivision of the north portion of recorded Tract No. 5481 in Huntington Arbour . The purpose of the new map is to provide an improved design with additional waterfront lots, but with an over-all total of 12 lees lets hsn resentty exists under tf.e recorded map . The use variance requested by us i_' necessary in order to implement dea+gn and construction of the improved layout shown on Tentative Tract No. 6405. Specifically we wish to appeal to you to approve the use variance items not rectmaaended by the Commission which would permit development of Tract No. 6405: 1 . Allow waterfront lots having minimum average widths of 50 feet per lot (the Commission has recomc+ended that the 50-1ort. width be provided at the front setback line) . 2. Allow waterfront lots with a minimum of 35 lineal feet of frontage fot every lot (the roamission has recommended 45 . .ect of frontage even for cul-de-sac lots) . 3 . Allow 20-foot front yard setbacks for garages having direct entrances fro© the adjoining streets (the Coasnisssion has held for a 22-foot front Yard setback) . In support of our appeal, we wish to bring to your attention the following pertinent facts: 1 . The subject tract constitutes a proposed resubdivision of a portion of recorded Tract No. 5481. The recorded map contains .:,;usrerou■ lots having frontages of 30 to 12 feet at that ends of the eu1•de-sac streets. Our request would �c ,S the sliairur frontage to 35 feet, thereby providing greater frontage than now exists, but at 'tbe same tilae pro'lding for a rt Mmabl• number of lots at the and of each cul-de-sac. 0 Honorable City Council Page 2 City of Huntington Beach ,Tune 14, 190 2 . Recorded Tract No. 54Ai ',taa a large percentage of lots which have an average width of 50 feet, but which do not have a width of 30 feet at the front setback line . The new layout still necessitatea n design which permits an average 50-foot width in certain cases in order to effect an efficient and esthetically beautiful design for the island fingers. However, we wish to again esphasine that the new design contains 12 less Tote than the recorded map. This, we feel, .furnishes a clear indication of our efforts to conform to the standards presently in force in the City of Huntington Beach. The granting of our appeal will simply allow us to develop the property with a lesser density and a better design than will be the case if we dovelop the property under the design shown on the recorded map. 3. The 20-foot front yard setbacka requested under the use variance for garages have direct entrance from the adjoining streets and will simply permit the lots in the new tract to hey developed with exactly the same front yard setbacks as the lots in recorded Tract No. 5481 . We respectfully request your approval of our appeal on the basis ghat Tentative Tract Map 6405 is a redesign of the recorded Tract 5481 and that the charges will benefit the City, the future homeowners and the corporation . Very truly yours , HUNTINGTON HARDOUR CORPORATION 107prolIC4 RDM:ec Richard D. Maitland enclosure check �/ •,i: ! L; jj �} ".a .��t �.1:1 r ;., �. .r ISM' 4h��'N�.'i, ,r r� '� }:7s :t 1 k '�S'» .C� kll� a. i.�, l � ;1�K7� f. 1.��' 11��' -j.�.'1C�,d�'itt��'t1T'fltty •i jf rtY�CS1?�t if: �yit 1r� . xrS i,l, 1r� � }.,e, , i � .. , .�f � . F, /�l .;7 •i 1 ' CAU SM-UPT 0� To CITY or BFACX C�1.2�7A�A S36.6nl ' t Dates A.a d rro.: AW... : II , .i;Aomnt n.1�,at , ?OAS ,..,� ■-, _ -�s.�A JOT f rr CODA to 0 A r ter•. ftw d lbo 406 an$a get d�a�lg r 1 MWPO- -r-W Coro nr 67-24 *wti C s Marb!m r Corp 16%2tbm !lace 3Mti"too Raab, Cal oe"m new school Dist 7972 Warier Avesms t!a■►tiastoo Beach$ Cal fart too Bomb Righ iob l Dutriet 1709 12tb street Ihntimstoo ISWA I Cal hate of California sacra "to California ogle Qra�r 999 D. sepalreda Blvd smite +�14 it ftgwdo, Calif 90245 N. A. Cormell IWI Casowel Lame smanstoa (each, Cal