HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Variance 67-54 - Coldwell, Banker and Company - Freeway Q`.1 t7
3
Coldwell , Banker & Company
FFAL ESTl:[ • Mt)$V;4jV L►NAGCy£NT # WORM.W. LQA.44 • 1h UAAIVE y
fi Mr.CA%T VIO.i•7 ill'.A► AY • hFINrU?t er-ACH.CALVGA.A• WOO Ks 1 31131
VA
Octocer 3, 1967
'at ,
APPROYLD ID1 C1T1" C:MJRZi L
Mr. Paul . Jones
City Clerk _ 19.,.....
`a City of Huntington Beach �� • �...
clty Hall Nov
;�i Huntington Beach, California CITY ciIxs '
'r
Re; Use Permit 67-54
Dear Mr. Jones:
On September 26, 1967, the Planning Commission denied Use Permit 6754
t{ and we would like to appeal the decision to the City Council at your
earliest convenience. Enclosed Is a check far $75.00, which represents
n1 the fee before said appmal . Weare appealing to the City Counti1 'the
41 Planning Commiss'iones dec5sion denying Use Variance' 6754, for the follow
QY i ng reasons
,y
1 . The tenant, Manny's, has attempted to locate in this area Tor
scxme time and has been unsuccessful because of the unwillingness of the
f commercial property o►iners to the east and west of the subject property
'{ to build for his u:,e.. the oniy property owner In the area %iiIIIng to
then-build for his use Is the, applicaot,therefore, the applicant feels
is a 'definiteb hardship }used on the Planning Ccm-nission's denial of his
7 use.
•� � 2. Every city in the County of Orange, .without exception, allows
' the cotistructlon of restaurants within tlteir Industrial zone,
industr
ial tenant nan within the area have encouraged the operator
to opeia as soon as possible so as to serve their needs. It i s :an bstab-
1 lah.od tact throughout the country that, t:here are restaurants %Ilth in
j industrial areas to �serve the industrial employee—, as well as .the, general
:, , public. it is of prime concern to`'the industrial en;ployea to hive,ata
4 "',eot ing' faci't l ty ne3ar,,h is plant or factory so .time. Is 'not wasted tr iNel ing ,; ?
Rutsidet. Af a►ee area to' eat:. 1n flits .'at•ticular case, cho renjcatsront will
%`withit� eas�� walking distarne,e to'`thet,ci.•rrent. .industrla! 'plants in�
. �. �.•. ,. Q .. .wet l
area, . This
restaurant wlil . not serve. )J 'uor and will be appointed as �
as' any coffee shop in Gal i ern ia.
1
1 i CONVKtlltkr .'+�Fitti»�f3 EA CAILIf �s'ANII...tRr r7NA. �tEtAO�
t�•
}
Mr. Paul Jones October 3, 1967
` Page two
We appeal to the City Councils-, good judgment in reversing the Planning , r
Cocnunission's decision on Use Variance 6i54 and grant the use of a rest-
` aurent on this s !te.
j, Very truly yours, -
.z CO L D WELL BANKER t; COMPANY
`dams Crou1
JrC:dv
'
A�
(fir
1• , 1 ti lI 1 1( `�
� ,.... ,._:. , ".. i If ..}. ,-. • .. '.. a:. .. •..•. .}. ._ ✓. , ..' : - —- �.... 1,
1,
GOLDEN' WEST
INDUSTRIAL PARKS, INC. 1e141 131THARO BT.i HUNTINLv—b fTrl BEACH, CAUraRNIA
(714) 546.0549
October 20, 1967
City Council
Civic Cantor
Huntington Beach, California
Re: Use Variance 67-54
Gentlemen:
We would like to express our opinion concerning the subject
Use Variance. As industrial land and building developers, vo
probably have the largest investment in this part of the city, with
the exception of the regional shopping center and the junior college.
Our industrial buildings are approximately L75 feet south of the
subject property.
The City of Huntington Beach has very little prlwe industrially
zoned property at this time. The area of Gothaxd and Edinger is one
of the only two or throe areas that are considered prime. No' do not
think a cmtmerclal use of this nnture is nov necessary to further
enhance the future industrial develop.acrit of the arts„
ourselves, being active daily in than area have constant inquires
for available industrial and office space, but never a request for a
eating place. Our present tennnts probbbly nioount to 00 or 90 per-cent
of the :nduatriel employees in the area Th+eyj along with ourselvea,,
feet that the three or four restaurants in H*ir,tington Center and
others on Beach Blvd, eLv more than ample for local sating requlreznnts.
Ve are in hopes that more industrial development will be started
In the near future on' Gothard Street, by others or oursell-ma. Until
that time, to protect the interest of a cell !Alancsd city, coupled
with our own contiguous industrial lnvontwnt, we ass no reason for
the city Riving up, any of its industrial zoned properties for cower..
clot uses. Since the north side of Edinger M-s has recently been
rezoned for co=ereial use, from industrial uss, we feel that all
property uses on Ctrs south side of Edinger fva should remain Industrial,
iiogeva , when industry further develops an Gothard Street, Lhen At
tbnt time, perhaps the industrial employment would +arrant eomeraial
axes on the south aids of Edinger Ave.
Very truly yours,
. 0y� at'"
T.
Ls L. IleDanetd, PresYd+tnc
GQLVEN WEST LIM3,S MAL VIAItX3*
iz
Coldwell , Banker & Company
440IIt;i11111 CWPVA6.1:�
REAL ESTATE • PQCPERTV UkNA(4UF,}iT • W:ATGAGE LOANS •jr•$VfeA?4Zr
.200 CAST COAST KGHi14V NEVbMRT MACH CALROCIVA 4'W )ft
October 20, 1967
Paul Jones, City Clerk
City of Huntington Brach
City Hail
Huntington Beach, California
Re: Use Variance # 67-54
Gentlemen:
The undersigned hareby requests a cor,_incance of the appeal to the
City Council from October 23 , 1967 to your next meeting.
Your cooperation in this matter is very much appreciated.
Very truly yours ,
COLDW L , BAN R & COMPANY
,es
JFC imc
v�a•r
ryNV�N�iNT .0 Cf1, 3°{ C��.ixLlGlt/►I►A' &Kix('NA, 04 x
Y
- '' .•r. rr r •rM�a,.4�'iL-"�(11T) r' tSt�I''"'ill r i
f
R E C El P ate-04iC- 781
� x
Received From -
Address ..�......•..... o
D itdrs5
Fo e.Af ✓
r
x
ACCOUNT 4MY PAID
AAA F. Of CASH
ACC"fT
Amr. I►,10 CKCX OP "77
Q dalPit AAGV+YY
- - -- -
P�J! O�QtE
$KID$ o•+�Jn.
O
surgical equipment "`�'Invo cftz43f,-,&,
16002 Gotherd St. • Hunting}on 6aath, Coif.
! November L, 1967 VMng MS01
0
fi
m
c
Mr. Janes F. Croul
° Coldwell , Banker & Company
4 ;'MO E. Coast Highway
,? Newport Beach, California
U
r0
Dear Mr. Croul :
Regarding our conversation yesterday on tentative plans
for a restaurant at Edinger and Gothard Streets , I wish
to re-state our posit-lon.
a�
.o, We firmly believe that a restaurant at this location
would be beneficial to this industrial area as it exists
at this time.
Manufacturing plants , such as ourselves , employ a large
number of factory workers on short: lunch periods . The
convenience to these people of having un eating estab-
lt%ihment here is apparent . Also , thinking toward the
future , a restaurant here will help serve the needs of
future businesses yet to be built in thts industrial
tract. Not to be overlooked is the Fact that it would
help draw new business into the area , as a well estab
lis lied restaurant close by always (ices .
While the rest.auran4s in the Huntington Center are ade-
quate for Oose of us with Longer ,lunch periods , satisfac-
tory sen ice is difficult because of competition with
shoppers And the large number of store pe rs Dnnel who take
their lunch at the same time .
For the reasons stated above , we wish to go on record as
being wholly in favor of a restaurant in this area and
believe that other manufacturers in the tract feel as we do .
Very truly , yours ,
PEDI GO PRODUCTS , INC.
R. R P,�dig
Secera
• ry.-Treasurer
RIP: Jb
VAN I DE r i
2 Ablishers of the FENNMVER
OV64M Adst►AIAM to nM a, E"t►en br1 m Invoo weW
16161 Gothoid St. .Huminptoit Beach, Calif. . 847.355E
I
i
November 2, 1967
Huntington Beach City Council
Huntington Beach, California
i
Gentlemen;
I
We heartily support the request by Manny's Coffee Shop
to build a much needed eating facility in the vicinity of
Gothard and Edinger.
i
The site is ideally situated and from the quality of
their service rnd structures in adjacent cities, they Mould
reflect a desirable business activity for Huntington reach.
Your favorable consideration would be appreciated.
Sir_ ercly`,�''
Robert J. 001arco,President
VOIDE PUBLISIUNG Co.
Publishers of the PF?MSAVER
ftJD/pb
a
- r a,
LORGE INGINEERING COMPANY
.j PRC�DU=1nr4 � MECTRQ-h1MHAMICAL � DMERIMEMAL
y ,
f 7424 ICOW CWW1 HUK1M4MWH UACH, CAW. 4=dr4a
f f 1P.0. 1"210 !hNN 1714; 042-2O] 121314301,546 '
November 2, 1967
1
ATTENTION: Mr. James F. Croul
Ref: Manny's Coffee Shop
�i
Edinger and Gothard hvenues
c
In reference to the above coffee shop to be located in
Huntington Beach - we feel this would be advnntageoiis
not only for our employees but for ' the other c*apauies
in this industrial area. "
Eating facil{ties in this part of tovn are limited com-
pared to ersonel employed ed and Mann 's would be' a welcomed
P P P Y Y
addition.
3
Lorg ngincerin Cog y
14,
ezuon Clark Jr.
Vice -Presid"t
General Manager
,
,
�y l.f »li yi. 1 � ,•
PLANNING RESEARCH CORPORATION
W I LORGE CIRCLE. IIUNINWON HACH. CAUFLUNIA MAY 842.4471
2 NovernL+-2z 1967
Mr. James F. Croul
Coldwell, Banx ►r 1c Co. i
2Z00 E. Coast Highway
Newport Beach, Calif.
Dear Mr. Croul:
In response to our conversation of this morning, this letter reiteratss
my foelings to t1e possible location of a restaurant/coffee Shop an the
corner of Edinger and Gothard. I feel that this proposed facility would
be a definite convenience to our employees and would in no ivay detract
from or injure the other industries in this immediate area.
Very t-.Wy yours,
,
LOW
G. H. Banister, Jr.
Director
Tacticnl Data Systems
Computer Systems Division,
GHB:fks
,
,