Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Variance 759 - Hunsaker, S.V. and Sons - West of Bushard f y Hlt tdn. ton Beach PI ng Comamssion •••• P. O. Box`190 bo - ��' City Hall \i 1 hG':••v ++�' C 'i'Y (;l�UNC1L Huntington Beach CaftEornia j V _.....�... • : POW CITY Cim! Dece:�:!ber 7, 1964 1ETTE :; 0 F TRA' IISI� ITTAZ TO: HOU40RABLE I' .i'OR -UTIDs 01TA Y COiTI;C111 City of Ru.Zn'ti22 ATTII: DO LE I'IL EB, City Administrator. �oUr ?�E. C O.1D31`I ONAL EXCEPTION -- UV #?5 9• AA - S' � V. Gentlemen: Herwo-1ith is the Blanni.ng Commission recoir-me" n ution, ,for approval of Conditional :;ception UV ;�759 for S.V. Runaa.kex amd Sons , 15855 Eaot Edna Flute , In- vindal.e; Cal:fornia, Said request involves exception to she Iium tington Beach Ordina zYee Code for Tracts 110 5755 eud 5756• The property J.o locatod on the writ ;aide of Busha,,d Street and approxiin3tcly 1000 feet south of Ad e Avenue ande ie coned RA Residential Agricultural District. The applicants request io 1'o construct a planned reside.1tial development consisting of 171 living; tuAte and 10 co-nmou green arc ass By unaniilous vote of the Planning (.10 ,, ioa ion, Conditional Exception UV #759 wan , approved and : w ecomme' n?Led to your -- Ronorable Body for approval upon the fcllovoing conditions :,i i . mhe development plan received November 23 , , 1964 , shall be the approved `pltui 2. The CC&:R ' s ,..;haU be 'fiubmitted to the P.1anning Depdrtment and Ci.ty A W torney f o,r .approval. ,3.. The 0C&Rla shn. 1l con twin at_ lea.- the follov�rir.g , - provla�.ons r - iuntxn • ga BeBeac�i I'1aixgaxnissio►n P. O. Box 194 7 at, Hall 4 r' Hundnimn'Beach, California a. Recreation areas within the development © b _ reservedfry t exclusive a hall r he u e o� - re3idents within the project and their non- paying sjuesta, b. Owners and/cr tensnts' shall be required to abide by Association rules and there 'shall be per-alties for violation of said rules. 4. All utili tfea shall be installed "cixiderground. ' Reapectfull. u.bmitted, F. A. Reyaolde 'Deptity Secretary FJ.R/J • I jt tt c a. )P*Oo Box; 681 Huntincrton Beach California January 13 , 1965 Hon. Donald Shipley , Mayor city Hal]. Civic `C ontzr Huntington beach, California .a. r Dear ,L,jayor Shipley: The Pacific Sands homeol,mers association wishes to go on rt o record in suppo Association' s �� f lea heaven riomeoz•�ners. opposition, to the proposed condenenium to be developed by In. v. Runsacker and oon approxiiaatly 1, 000 feet south of ioushard Avenue. The Pacific t3ands i omeomers association also wi.sl es to go on record as objecting to the developement of condemeniums irithin the boundaries of .Atlanta on the, south, Adams on the north, reach vl,vd, on the west , and iroolchuriat on the east. we . expect the. `dil;y Council. and .the Planning Commission trill ive this letter due consideration. very truly yours, Al Coen president Pacific bands nomomiers ` msoc. AC:mo AOX SEA-HAVEN HOMECRIER& ASSOCIATION - JAN.13,i965 1,The Honorable Donald Shiplay Mayor oT Hunti.gnton Beach and members of the city council. Huntign.ton Beach, Calif. Subjects Use Variance #759, Tettative Tract Ha.ps #5755 & 5756, proposed.' ' coniominium type development by the H.V. Hunsacker & Sons Corp: While we are not specifically opposed to this deielopement in, the, areas. of den and structure type; the are opposed to the propoeaed routing.' of traffic, that a to say, we are opposed to the 'routing of some '4�0+ automobiles daily � through. 2 points of egresst one directly to Dushard St. and the other a subs► standard 401- vide private street emtyi.ng directly into a low density reeidentual area) . 4 It is our contention that the existing streets are ilroady be_ng used to a maximum oafe capacity and any further overloading will lead to, inr�im"-rable traffic and pedestrian safety problems We ask that the City Council deny or contineue this case until' •such time as an equatable solution can be reR..ched. Very truly yours "SEA-HAVEt1 H r :Er ., .0C7A T . DI:RG Ii' fu ROBE E PRESIDENT {�. r cE • .AD � , r • 2..�.� ! S. H. Langlois 9392 Nautilus Drive , Huntington Beach, Calif. December 11, '19G9 . ;<. „ Honorable Mayor and City Council t City Hall Huntington Beach, California I� } Honorable Sirs: F is , respectfully requested It q d that your Honorable Aod reconsider and ,,�xeclare a rehearing of Use , Variance No. 759. Inasmuch as '. there was so little time, between the. recommendation by the, Planning Commission at their ;December 16t meeting and the action ,. , by the City r Council on Deceinbe., 7th, we are making- this request:: Yox xs 'very truly, {f: H. Landl �s 1TAAM 4 Y L. LR, CITY 1 K F UNTINGYON BEACH. OFFICIALS � K6rA *OYLE MILLER ,� ��A ADMIM.iIfTRAT1YC OIrIC[N SFIRANDER D. CASTLE ARHRTAfTADMINISTRATORF Ygw Aw &b lead. V ...., — JAMES IL WHEELER , -----»__--- ^-------- {_---- -- --- DIRtCTORor PUBLIC NORKM P. O. Box Igo C. A L I FOR N I A VW4K 10.'ARGUZLL) nf� 92&1t3 YINANC;PIR[CTQR JOHN SELTZER POLICE 041tr DELB[RT 0. HIGGINS COUNCILMEN nRs CNItr N DOALD 0. SHIPLEY. MAYOR VINCENT O. MOORHOUSE ERNEST H. GIGL4R u►EauARaellly B013ERT M. LAMeiGRT OLLIN Q CLEVELAND JAKE R. STEW,%RT ■WLDINif11RRCTOR THOMAS H. WELCH p�! EDWARD R. STANG December 11, 1964 WATERDUPVI1NTtNDENT f PAUL Q JONES CITT CLERK JAMES D. PLUNKETT CITY ATTORNEY BETTY OIEKOFP TR"AURCA Honorable Mayor Donald ID. Shipley Honorable Councilman Ernest H. Cioler Honorable Councilman Ja;m R. Stewart Honorable Councilman 1 omas H. Welch Honorable Councilman Robert M. Lambert Address Huntington. Beach, California Dear Councilman At the meeting of December 71 . 1964, under r1anning Transmittals , your Honorable Bodyacted unanimously to rant Conditional' .' ' . Exception Use Variance No.: 7S9 as re 'ueste - q d,; b `.S. Y. , Hiinsakor & Sons, Iryindale on ..property, located on the west side - or Bushard Street , approximately 1000 feet south ,of, Adams: Avenue. At the -time or this action, there was ` no one in the audience wishing to address the Council and speak on the mutter. The'between ewa kirsds of Use which allows, the.iances�t�nw�ar denial.' of". by. the Planning Commission, wi tlh a possible appeal to eame�, . allowed to the City .Counrtl .. The other :type 'can`1only . be ' recow- mended for approval "„or, denial the Planning. CoX`M' ission and ' y :the City Council makes the decision in the granting or danyirg of 5"e, use . vaz4a, nee No. 759 falls in the latter category. as . happens"'tjo , or , three 'times,,a year, the firaaV of the month fell._ oh :Tuesday, making''thatI the ,,date' for the, Planning .Coat- mi ssi on. meeting City: Council 'meeting one.the:.=irat',Monday ,'o f, ! ni `C miission 'meetin , on December let , the. Planning Coaa a l.o,n ! the , month `- had their ateeti fa11: oa ;'December Ith. , . At the Pla�un recom aendedi approval;. of., Use Variance No. . 59 'and it wain ttmis-' it Cotu�cil . �'ox ;heir. w ug riritted to the- City y eeti o December .7th. Page #2 U.V. #759 December 11 , 1964 Homeowners in the area of the Sea Maven Tract , believing, that the Use Variance would not be acted upon by the City Council for almost two weeks , failed to be present at the meeting ..Qf December 7th to resister their objections . I believe , that due to the circumstances , the people were honestly not aware ; that the matter would be acted -upon so soon. a Mr: Langlois appeared in our office this morning to file an appeal to the granting by the Planning Commission.: of this rarianco. I informed him that the action was made ',,by the City Council ; not the Planning .Commission, and that there is no appeal- to the action of. the Council, which is the h.1ghest .1ri- banal of the City. I further informed him that Y' would,:accept a letter on behalf of the Council. , requesting a reconsideration , and a public hearing in this matter', and that this would- be governed by the action of your A6 grable Body. .. On advice from `} the Assistant City Attorney, I would not accept: an appeal fef of $75.00 in the matter because it was not an appeal to a delis- ion "of the Planning'",Commission. The matter, will .be Placed ;before you for your consideration at the next regular meeting December 217, 1964. This letter , although lengthy and rambling , is being written to advise you of the facts in the case in order that � you may know the circumstances when discussing it with people involved. I . am eucloning herewith a copy of the letter requesting `r6con-- siderdtion anal a hearing. ,submitted by I anglois. Also enclosed is., a copy of a letter from Dale Heinly, requesting rcz;onuideralion and rehearing in the denial of Use Permit No. 256 , covering a. proposed gasr..xine station at the southwest corner of Banning , Avenue and Dushard Street. This letter is almost self exp,l:enatory. These copies would normally be included in your package witf! 'the agenda. Sincerely yours , CITY OF `IUNTINGTON BEAC6 Paul C. Jones City Clerk a ,,I I CJ . tr, Enc : (2)