Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Variance 759 - S.V. Hunsaker and Sons - Residential deve Huntington beach P'1anning Commission w r•� r. a. tm too L •••• uNCt �; Hundagton Bcwh, California • 1 164 __ -- crTY c�.asrt 7 , 1 c. T0: !TC:'U u,BL L:Ay OR A:,D M111.1 (,C'„T:10CI'L, Ci-16 of Huntin A1'-AT DCYLE "IilE.i , City 1►�I::;izii�trator. )O`� Y �1Y RE n:'D1_IO':AI. 4'Fi4.'IOI; - 7V d 7 5� • `r 1� G^atlim,,m: F?crc: .,i;,h i.s tl:c P1^r.-�ir:� Cc:::^ i�.��on recos::*ncn a ion for x; pr1;►: I of Con:: LTV J"50 for S.V. Hu-nnaker �_rd Sync. , 7.5��.�5 :;r.�st Eir'. :1n�.c� , �..,•-ind::.lc� , C-.i 4fortiia.. S yid re;,ue::t ir.-�:�Ire , ��.:c tio:i to 'he Huntin.ton Beach "+l;►+ r�'Gr�rt� i �, l;.c'iLcd t`..t! iA lr of B-:r,}lavd 3 treott 'i:1C� �.ni'I.4':1: .1'�i:�j' I. ooti -h of _lcla_.::� Av!'f_ue and io .:or.c Hn s�c�'i.i -at=. .1 �1•ic�a1 tur:�]. Di ._•ict. Tti�A _r.-1ic'�it:; rhr�Tie + `u Corl c reoicien:,y,ai svtrr''rT;Ll0?2i i ccn- l;. �; n C r �.`, 1. 7 vi::U 1L`: tL; -tnd 10 cr, .70n t;rven - z . - B: u.-i nir::ou votC of ���e r::.-:nning Co:. -ic,7ioa , Conditional E):.cc tion W Y759 was :�tpprovcdl ,:r.d T••_-corjrer ;ed to ;,your Honorable Body fir the following conditions t 1 . The dev^:.op:ment p1wi rcccived ::ovember 4223 , 196A; , shall be the aT proti ed plan. ? . The CCO&I, I 3hall ba cub.aitteA to the Fl,:snnir-6 Department :end' City Attorney for approval. 3 . The CC°R ' 3 Whall contain at least the following provisions: I �r 0 Huuntiupon Beach P g CCoi mimion R. a am in aT " HunNngan Busch, California 11. Recrenta.on r:rn s within the dcvelupment shall be reserved for the exclusive u:9c cf reaidento within til:e p_oject and their non— r_ ayi.nr; j,-Ildsto . b . Nmers and'lor tenazitj ©hall be required to abide by As3oci.:.tion rules and there shell be p<e.:glties for violation of ^.-Lid rule©. r • All util;tica shu 1 be inotQlled underground , ReSPOsctfull-~ ouhmi.tted , K. k. Reynolds Deputy 5ecretaxy i Box 681 Huntington beach, California January 13 , 1965 11 Hun. Donald Sh{pley , ga.yrr. City A'Iall Civic Canter HtintinU.on xseachp Unlifornia a Dear wayor Shipley: The Pacific sands uomeowners Association wishes to ;o on record in support of Sea Heaven momeoimers �►.�+^^^ia .�on� s opposition to the proposed condemenium to b: developed by n. v . Hunsacker and oon approximatly 1,000 feet south of nushard Avenue. Y'he Pacific :3 ands nomL-o•cmers nRsociation also wishes to go on record as nib jecting to the developemeziL of condemeniums � within the boundaries of atlanta on the south, Adams on the north, „each ulvd. on the west , and urookhurst on the east. ae expect the city Council and the Planning %:,ormnission will give this letter due constleration. very truly yours , Al Coen rresideat racifi-n bands nomeovmers Assoc . AC:mb SEA-RAUX HOMEO'iffl S ASSOCIATION J AN.13, 1965 The Honorable Donald Shipley Mayor of Iiuntignton beech and members of the city coancil. Hunti,gnton Peach, Celif. Subject: Use Variance #759 , Tentative Tract Naps #57.55 & 57j6, pro'rosed condominium type development by the H.V. Hurnacker & Sons Corp. Sire: 'Shile we are not specifically oproscd to this developement in the area® of density and structure types we am opposed to the propossod routing of trafficq that is to say , we ara oppcced to the routintr of some 400♦ automobiles daily through 2 points of egress ( one directly to Bushard St. and the ot:.ar a et�.b& standard 40' wide private street emtying directly into a low density rosidentual area) . It is our contention that the existing streets are alrec.:-dy being used to a maximum safe capacity and any further overloading will load to innumerable traffic and pedestrian safety problems We ask that the City Council deny or contineue this cane until such time as an equatable solution can be reached . Very truly yours SEA-HAVEN h ;.;", rIIF.R . . CUA ROBER'i E. LThGti'! I. P��zSIL'aUT R JNJ14 F11 Q i .9 i LOCI!!- I � V H. Langlois 9392 Nautilus Drive Huntington Beach, Calif. December 11, 1964 Honorable Mayor and City Council City Hall Huntington Beach, Cal ifernia Honcrable Sirs : ' It is respectfully requested that your Honorable Body reconsider and declare a rehearing of Use Variance No. 759. Inasmuch as there was so little time between the recommendation by the Planning Commission at their December lot meeting and the action by the City Council on December 71.2h, we are making this request. Yours ver} truly, H. La`n'g1�ea DEC' 11 TA AM ,R jE T !E - G I � =3 L y a; 4 E R Ol i'Y OF K ` HUNTINGT+ON REACH v� OPFICIALIh DOYLJI MILLER AOMINI{T1IATIY[O/IICi. Awe/ BRANDER V. CAME CITY OF wesletANTwoMIM1�TRAo� %' _ .-.. ...--------- - - -- --_---_.,_ _---_---._-..___-_-- -_ .JAMEi R. WFIEELEr DIRIC'TDR oI/IJSLIC.•wffMll� P. O. BOX 190 C A I, I I'0I{ IV 1 A (RANK B. AROURLLo �` �•� �. 92fr1K rlRArrt La1RscTo� • ` �� JOHN BlLTZ[R POLACIt CNIi/ 0EL9KRT D. HIGGINS COUNCILMEN Fin CHI[/ DONALD D. SHIPLEY. MAYOh VINCENT O. MOORMOUSE ERNEST H. GISLER U/UGUAROCHIRP RORERT M. LAMSERt OLLIN C. MMLAND JAKE R. STEWART SUIL.DING OIR=TCW THOMAS H. WELCH 9W.VAND IL /TANG December 11 , 1964 MA19111 RU/IRINTNNpiNT PAUL C. JONES CITY CL1111% JAMtB 0. PLUNKETT CITE AtTORN[T BET:'' OIEKOFF TRCASURILM Honorable Mayor Donald D. Shipley Honorable Councilman Ernest H. Gisler Honorable Councilman .late R. Stewart Honorable Councilmen Thomas H. Welch Honorable Councilman Robert M. Lambert Address Huntington Beach , California Dear Councilman , At the meeting of December 7 , 1954, under Planning Transmittals , your Honorable Body acted unanimously to grant Conditional Exception - Use Variance No. 759 as requested by S. V. Hunsaker & Sons , Irwindale , on property located on the west side of Oushard Street , approximately 1000 feet sputh of Adams Avenue. At the time of this action, there was no on* in the audience wishing to address the Council and speak on the scatter. 'there are two kinds a.+ Use Vuriat:ce■ with a technical difference between them, which allows the granting of denial of one type by the Planning Commission, with a possible appeal to sane allowed to t:�e City Council. The other type can only be recom- mended for approral or denial by the Planning Costmission , and the City Council makes the decision in the granting or denying of name . Use Variance No. 759 falls in the latter category. As happens two or three times a year, the first of the Month fell on Tuesd�,;, , staking that the date' for the Plaanit�g Com- mission meeting. City Council , meeting on the first �'Io�nday of the month had their meeting fall on December 7th. At the Plan— nimg Commission meiti on December 1st , the Planning Cammiawloa reaaremdod, approval of Use Varlanem No. 730 and it was tms-- tiitted to the City Council for their heating of December ?tb.. Page #2 U.V . #759 December 11 , 1964 Homeowners in the area of the Sea Haven Tract , believing that the Use Variance would not be acted upon by the City Council for almost two weeks , failed to be present at the meeting of December 7th to register their objections . I believe , that due to the circumstances , the people were honestly not aware that the matter would be acted upon so soon. Mr . Langlois appeared in our office this morning to file an appeal to the granting by the Planning Commission of this variance. I informed him that the action was made by the City Council, not the Planning Commission, and that there is no appeal to the action of the Council , which is the highest tri- bunal of the City. I further informed him that I would accept a letter on behalf of the Council , requesting a reconsideration and a public hearing in th1s; matter, and that this would be governed by the action of your Honorable Body. On advice from the Assistant City Attorney , I would not accept an appeal Pee of S75.00 in the matter because it -ras not an appeal to a decis- ion of the Planning Commission. The matter will be placed ba"ore you for your consideration at the next regular meeting December 21 , 1964. This letter , although lengthy and rambling , is being written to advise you of the facts in the case in order that you may know the circumstances when discussing it with people , Involved. I am enclosing herewith a copy of the letter requesting recon- sideration and a hearing submitted by Langlois. Also enclosed is a copy of a letter from Dale Heinly requesting reconsideration and rehearing in the denial of Use Hermit No . 256 , covering a proposed gasoline station at the southwest corner of Banning Avenue and Aushard Street. This letter is almost self explanatory. These copies would normally be included in your packase with the agenda. Sincerely yours , CITY OF IRWINGTON BEACH Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ : tr Enc : (2) I