HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Variance 780 - Dorothy Lamb - Construction of a mobile h 846
RECEIPT �9_._._. No.
r
Received From
Address &&W 10 jLmtwkt;!Ju des
For
ACCOUNT (,w
,rr
"T. PAID
out 84 ------
$KOH &war* S7 E'i�;. 1 i
7.
1
' ;•h' '4.• •tom' �''' r �..
w� ...
��� T
• '� ��i
m'.
r- j. �
����'YY.�§•, , •':�at�+�`. .. ,}rye . y,r�ryv •-
F e ...� � .,�� `f
r �.
•�
�� h
h •Y�
T Y
�' i
•A ^. 9t
'N,
... ,. 'Y
(Published Huntington Beach Hem Dec.
3, 1964)
(Published Huntington Beach Nears July LEBAL NOTICE
13. 1965) "OTICE OF PUBLIC NUMNO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING UV Nei 7aa
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub-
UV me. 7" lic hearing will be held by the CHy
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub- Planning Commission of the Cyr of
tic hearing will be held by the City Huntington Dear in t:.e Council Moon-
Council of the City o; Huntington Beach bers of the Civic Canter. Huntingbe
in th* Council Chamb+rr of the Civic Beach, California. at the harp' of 7:311
Center. (Huntington Beach, California, at P.M.. on Tuesday, December 25, 1964
the hour of 7:30 o'clock P.M., or as for the purpose of considering a patttferr
soon thereafter as possible, on Monday, for a Conditional Exception to regulations
the 2nd day of August, 1965, for the of the Districting. Ordinance.
purpose of considering an appeal to To allow the construction of a rna
the granting by the Planning Commis- bile home park in the A-1-Y Ceteral
slot of Condition Exception. Use Variance Agricultural district.
— UY No. Tall, to regulations of the D'rs- Located 300 fact north of Yorktown
tricting Ordinance, to allow the con- Avernu* on the west side of crook-
struction of a nubile home park In hurst Street and legatly daaeribed as
tht A-1-Y Garter() Agricultural District.
the South 24 acres of the North 72
on property located 300 feet north of acres of the E%, HEVs, Section 54-10. i
Yorktown Avenue on the west side of All Interested persons are Invited try
1lrookhurst Street and regally described attend said hearing and oppress UvW
as fotkms: opinions for or agoinsll the peaposed
The South 24 acres of the North +Conditional Exception requeeted by said
potitica.
?2 acres of the E% of the N Et/a, Further h ihm oration may be obtained
Section wee-in. from the office of the Secret ry to the
All interested persons are inviied to Planning Commission.
attend said heerin' ' and ex 3r d . . is"
press their v+++c�. affix.._� ..... ..w ...-s .
opinions for or against said Use Variance. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION(
Further Information nuy be obtained IL A. REYNOLDS
from the Office of the City Clerk. DePWW SeCrellwy
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Nlh PAUL C. !ONES
City Clerk
T _
'I
I
i
i y �
- Yv - L '�!'�� ,: • tee Grj/�
1p
Of
// 1l r/]] �
r /r
IE
�?-� ��_� � c� �' r Lit'—�,�e•� . ` .
ti
1
a rc
Wo
1
, ti' ,.,✓ry,•i+4,�y F '�11t;,�9. ,. .,a,'�x:.•'1i
M. 'Lily.tj
•�,
r• r�
y L•
. ,Pp ..
/17
fts� A"TICJO
,O� SAVINGS
ANP LOAN ASSOC1AT10%
SJM WNIMIR SMUVAIId O LOS AWCALIS, CALUORN11% I 12
1f_frMONl 261.9371
January 4, 1%5
Mr. Mayor and City Council
City of Huntington koch
Huntington beach, California
Gentlemen:
In I ieu of filing a formal protest of Lhe Variance 0780, which was approved by the Planning
Corr++"Nion on December 15, 1964, 1 as president of the Glen Mar Hon*owrwm Association
wish to save us all time and trouble, and present some factors to you for your consideration.
Use Variance 1780 allows construction of a mobil home park, 300 feet north of Yorktown
Avenue on the Weit side of prookhurst Street, legally de,cribed as the south 24 acres of the
north 72 acres of the E 1/2, NE 1/2 of Section 6-6-10. This area is presently molter planned
for R-1 and is surrounded for the most part by R-1 dwellings.
We have attempted through the Planning Commission to obtain more specific details, but this
has not been provided since it was maintained that no details were available . This is somewhat
disheartening, since after our many discussions you have assured us that oll information requested
by us would be provided . We therefore concluded, that the Planning Commission does not have
these details, and question on what basis the Plonninq Commission used to determine the
acceptability of the Varinnce .
This purposed mobil home park is pirportedly to be confined to adults only . Hence, this adults
only clause is suppo+e to reduce the population density to R-1 standards, when in octuallity,
it will be R-5. Fortunately, or unfortunately, depending on the economics of the situation in the
future, the concept of adults only may or may not be reolized . After the mobil home pork is
completed, if the adults only concept is not followed, it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible
to force this concept upon the already build mobil home park as it could be determined to bean in-
fringement upon the rights of the mobil home park mwners . Consequently, we foal the adults only
concept is not valid .
low
cant.-
Troller parks depending upon the layout of the facilities and their location could conceivably
appreciate an area, or more likely, douse a depreciation. Glen Mar valuation at present is
gram $20,000 to $30,O00 with an estimate by Ca I iforn is Federal Savings and Loan Assoc cation
to increase in valuation by at least 25% by 1%7. Therefore, we are somewhat concerned with
the probability of a mobil home park depreciating the surroundings,
Doing owners, we are aware of appreciation and depreciation, but we do
I�` rtY PrtY fx
not feel that Mrs. Lamb or her representative have a justifiable cause in personal hardship
due to the condition . In checking fro determine the soil reports for the K. W. Kol I Tract,
c>lposerd cent ad'l to the p mobil home park, we find that there is no soil repast in file as of
a
December 23, 1964 and we question what happened to this soil report. The soil report of the
property in question, state the peat-bog condition varied in dept from 5 to 20 feet, but we
have a reliable but unconfirmed report that a test boxing taken 18 inches from the K. W. Kol I
Tract bottemed out at 30 feet and there were still in peat, which again raises the question, what
happened to the K . W. Koll sail report. Consequently, we again must conclude that sometHng
is missing.
The streets are planned to be 25 feet wide, yet a planned community must have streets 40
feet wide, with which we agree. Therefore, we feel that the 25 foot street is not justifiable and
thct the streets should most the standards of the city.
In my dealings with you gentlemen, as the president of Glen h%r Homeowners Association, in
spite and because of otir many differences of opinions, I have gained respact for your judgment.
raised on our marry discussions, I think you must admit that many times, persc.mily, and as
spokesman for Glen Mor, I have taken a stand defending your actions based on the philosophy
which you `save implied to me. In writing this letter to you, I request a very hand, long and
close look at this mobil home park and at the concept of including a mobil homre park in an
R-1 area. We also must consider the development of the a-ea adjacent to the 24 acres. If
this mobil home pork is allowed, then of course the next !ogico l move is to allow entire area
to become a mobil home Fork . This mobil home park if allowed, may and possibly will constitute
a co�nsiderabie hardship on not just one family whose wealth is for above average, but upon
hundreds of families in the middle income bracket, who have for more at stake.
We the homeowners and tar, payers of this city look upon this 24 acres with extreme apprehension.
If you cannot see your way clear to deny this request for Variance, thus would you be soy kind
as to instruct the Planning Commission to gain more specific details concerning this trailer park
and through representatives of Mrs. Lamb and the Planning Commission, meet with us soy that
we may discuss the situation and become convtrent with the plans.
We are not at this time stating that a trailer park should not be allowed, but rather asking your
conclusion of the feasibility of this action.
A trailer park presently under construction on the south *nd of the city has had some question
raised as to the building standards which are being ma into,ined. We have been inforrrced through
an uncornfirmoble source that this park is for below city standards which adds to our apprehrrtsion
of this mabil homm park adjacent to us.
,t.on#.w
In conclusion, to avoid long drawn out discusitms, rwar calling and harsh unjust publicity for you,
Mrs. Lamb and Glen IWar, we take this nwrans a( communicating tour feelings to you, and i as
Presklont, respectfully request you carefully consider all the foctars before you act and provide
u4 with at least a verbal answer from the council as to the reasons why this mobil hone pcnrk should
be allowed, if you so determine that it should.
As we have marry times discussed, our city should be run an understanding tend facts, not ~ions.
This is another reason why I am choosing to communicate with you in this manner verses owing
commotion at a council meeting. A number of persons have stated that you will no mom than
receive and file this litter. I have personally stated that you wile do man than thatt ynu
will look into this nwitter from an objective view point under the best 'nterest of the city wed
pray ide us with the facts concerning the d i c is i ons you make.
Cordially,
Don L. Eddy
President, Glen Mar Flanreowrmm Assoc is t i on
D LE/sr
P. S . If you read this letrer allowed, please provide the attached ropy to Mr. drobock of
the Daily pilot in order that I might not be too badly misquoted this time.
.�
• - .
• �.
' � . .
,� . �
II
r
b
t =1*y*
D LAmb Trust
U*77 Avemn
Chino Calif
lhyllis 1 Vinicky
12 01 S. birch St
Santa Ana Calif
Lou ra Harp
8371 Garfield
City
Count Sanitation District #1
W
1104 . Sth St
Santa Ana Calif
Earl A Lmb
18752 Gregory Lame
City
Southern Calif Edison Company
P 0 Box 111
city
Hunt ire gton Beach High S ch coo 1
1902 17th St
Cit r
Fountain Valley School District
9502 Velardo Drive
City
Wi.11las Duncan
19731 beach 81vd, Witt G
{' CITY OF , T .: C. H
P L A N'
MOO i.4
�
yri ,r
' i'.F1t~D BY
. J
a�
�i
•
•
" _ R ■ i i t ■ ! i !� s ■ i Re ■
• s u s ! ■ s s ; s a ■ s t s R s R R `� i t s
s ■ s s ■ R ■ i i i ■ R ■ R ■ ■ ! s s R t : s s ! i i !
� ��3
i
s t R • � ■ i • � BID ■
s s ■ s i 6 ■ c s ■ ■
s s s s s e s � s s s • s
s ! r s s s s e s s s Q
R R : isLl
■ a ■ s ■ t : ■ ■ e ■ ■ ■ ■ i i t iyR ( �7
all Is
A '1A z a • • r r e • a
ti
■ S R i t s s t ! t ! t s ■ s 3 s i s ■ t f s r e s ■ R ■ � f e
s 3 , t s s s e e �■
s ■ ! s r s s e s ■ s s ■ t t i ■ ■
e s ■ s s i ■ a . s i a s • 4i •,# #
�■ � ■ ■ 0 r ! ■ i ■ ! s ! s i R i s s s i ■ i ■ # s ■ ; i s ■ C*j ad
t
R L a i R 0 •.
• • � • • • • • • • • t s 1 • 0 • ► _
(3 C3..
Wl'm I t _ • i # s t as e c s i � i # t ; ; t e s # s s s : ae s : s s s s s R ! it s t f3 a s 's s i Ruirsawa * wle i iil a k a
! s s = s s • s It s s s It s s It s i s M s s c s s L s s a s a = t s s s s s s s s s s s • s s t s s s s s s s s eA i 1 i i ; R • • s i i # s 1r
.
.' . (K, w1 MLL) UV #780 L+mub
d.L •
2/2"/63 L
a .
• N rr
+ Addrwn Lot No, ldame•
S&Ij un Ian o 65. 19391 W'aIfilb IAn i
ISM &Uwn 14m a 661 19A
7► " '. 68, 19361 r q
192 " " 69. 193 " n
1ST3 70# 1'� 1 n R
19362 a " T 31 19311 " a
WT2 74. r li
3,93W 75. 19281 R • a f9
.t114-1 1yy'*+ 1' ' � 7. p
76. 1g�12TI San
pa.` r,.,aive
�
, ": IOU2 w 78. 9541 Tarpon Drive
i
19' h32 a n 79, 9561
19L42 " $0. 9571
19452 81. 9591 W "
r V472 N n 821 96M q "
4ir9'7 194T1 " 831 9611
d . 19wa A •1
r: 65. 963+
• Air, 19412 Ptrch Circle 891 9661 R r
19432 It 69# 9671 •.
.-• lam' " —44. 9661
.2t, 19452 " .Q 19381 5akin Im e
194?'2 '' " -0`: 19371 " R . .
990 3A 71 c 1,,'9)- 19361 n— "
'0. 1941 " „ 't�' 96U St11fi A ')d"
'32. 19431 " 96, 9662
• 19411 979 9652 a R
o 19W Catfish Circle 01 96W " a
35o 19432 of " q9, 9632 „ 11
36# 19"2 tt• " 10"). 9622 a "
37# 19452 ft
+1.m a 9612
38,
�,. 390 BE7.1 IT " 103, 9592 a a
409 19451 " " 104. 9572 a a 1
42# 1901 n „ 1o6. 9551 Tarr m Drive
We 19U2' - # �l;32 H3.uegS.T.1 Circler ��+ 51
. I
b6. 19wo It 110. 9561
' 47,w 1S452 " 13.11 9511
k, A 72 1 r 132, 9591 A "
),ii�# i%71 rl tl MI
y
7.9LQ " 11'�(t, OF HUNTINGTON ACH
MILL
joun r q
! ��
a� � � 1NG � +oMfilI 10Pj 1 K R
o " � 3 M
i '�. 7ws ah Lane r "
Joe
120 1 72
tl nAM#
"
331 R M
• r M �, 3n R
. p
M +« r+`... ,,,,. r 72 R N
■ Ir wukm M R N
down** tea: Pw R ■ �
. r
! 41
Mae an s s s s s a i s i a s s a s a ■ s a ■ s s s s
i f i !� _ ! ■ i i a ! 1 i = i s a a a ! a 1 i t � � a ! i
G`) c
z
cn
p z . . . r '`.� -0 I %. +. t
0 I
. � w ' 1-111111,ek!HOUR?..U IIIIII
D s 2 s a i s a s a a a a a a ! a a s a a a ! a a a a s in a +
1
t
�r
I
We. ftltes D. L.s•b ; f:
1X77 a f,
C1� , Csliie
U t use Tiiar4~4 #74 0
Dom Mo. Lmb t
At the rogsUr MUM of the City COMCLI of the CUT :of
Mw l�sqPsw Mock bold air 1lsseh It 11"50 m MPP401 "wr filed
by SUA Mir ok:. AsamiatUn o iss Now U—som 26—tintom &art h0*0 riaat#,1ru� r■d
irWi M ► l #t Aoa*PL&tlra# do
war�►t �by the City Ptsombn * sift of tier "Jest Res
an O0 Ll� o s sue. lt* tbs appeal om
umt to *a d to
set and dire etMd so to wott �r of t1�a astlem'o Ur
to + r will be so for Ards &" rwt of flow" ut
l"s to �r �i It wr i it that r
;Wvdw mm of ford l+t retr is this matter. �wrwrrr�
the emoLds'.'atum to be tAm at toy w rums of monh 131�r
will got somotlefto i �il#1 o� tbes� d t�jo m
Co�all my ftly rrt to "t r.
If we am wo t you with my hrdwir italnustion In Me
mattes 1plewe hksl fems to esstest or effioe,
•im"wly Tows r
r.
Y'
Strost abOU be dedlested and f--w-Mvoed to
ct" ttdoda ►.
2o ftmot ts+ s aed "root 1 Oftil be 1
---Ob*m str"t ft Grp =:t of h6i r t sda.
3. A 6 toot W e& wall ill be ae��lt�d •��d
the oat in prWIMMtor of the paw jam. At loot a 25 n 23
feet COMM Oft oat WwLl be pcow at On
St met r*trUM a
4. All off matmr "s1k!► "ll, be to tip Ctr■oL ftM
Stan"rda,
3. Draindip foes shall be paid,
69 A 13 feet drone ip esed sat shall to prrawLded A*"
the Ott Property lim,
7. Draimmmea at the pt�oprrty shall bar •pp d by t� Dgw-e
.oral a h *lic wa,r. 1
B. The 24 foot Ade •tote rhnll be 23 feet aide.
4. All rivoto scants shall home a �s t rra tea
of 25 feet.
10. An aoaesrr fno do oerttlyreet sss rr of tbo
pv -.bail be n1vUed to IFLve Dep rowl a1 Do-
pso i of Public lisibs StaftislAs t
11e OnAp of wVrrt��rr shall be mppervrd by a gwlif lad
12+ 710 moils► 1-1 1 pa tk sb*l l be 000*UW %Y adurlt• 081Y.
i tlxlr a>a tioa 11 bar of aaa:tiitagM ter loU •W
O r iaa,Lee, if you aid errs.. data$ thisqw-
�Ll
r+t lOUv rrrrrlaa.
Very t Yount
1tratb A. wqw
aw"We
Aattft 1300dwaPLON"ir
oat GLtp �l
motor
CIO
weal► c
i
r
February 25, 1965
Mr, Valk Po ter, P r esidont
Glen Her 11mminers Aamwintion
19842 Pravidemse Loom
Huntington )%aah, California
Dear Mr. Porter: 5ab je et t Um Vartaaar 780
On Ferbtoary 15 1963, the City roil award m to prs°oprrars
a ='spent for tiro infor�antion► of your or sotUm err U►so
Variame 7".
This veriance li.�rpfea to twentyfour aeaves of .land located
300 fret oorrth of Yorktom Avenue on the wart aide of
firookhurst Stmet. Mrs, Walter D. t.o* is the prRe ►arty
owwr and applioant. she intoa ft to 000mtnat a ile
how park w h maroational feaLlities and 203 apdoee
which will be rsetrictod to adults awly.
The rlaaai.ng Ciaaio►n hold a prlle: harrrrit mardip�
use Warria 780 on tieoember 139 1964. Two r a
aI and two p agatiwrt the pa.�+apee .o speks to"
pae�al. Censidegrble discussion oeasteind an d 90141
aamdi,ttems (m the prop not This 444pa terarrt and the POO.
"
. Wet of Public �rkrrLth veviaved a "ram l t�srray
sails Isfwstigetim' OOO&,Ct*d by b. V. Law".
sod Co*, Ines, an the p►txrprrty.
It we aaeraludod by both der xtm • erad so statrrd to the
parading C missies that bear.. a sua'lsor aratle of "m
and aLay then is a post deposit four to ten feet is
tAmabdmft
his a.
awme of this coalition the tlaranrin& C rIssiorr datevoL d
tlret ■ lrrsdship 41A OLIAt an the rmp arty. It isrrr " be
rle�erdi Without euterraivs ex"Ven" of pile femur" care.
is m iattie Ymbl " ilk tMtallwtioa 01 starreta �
stilitiea d be ve di.ff t"It to ever s are. Kth thm"
ilad the t aarrl. si@m r -Ai sl t Ihm
Vrrt'iI 700.upo to following conditims : t
"MINUTES Council Chamber , City Hall
Huntinwton Beach , California
Mond.°1 .:....Amax t 2„a 1985
!"" Mipley called the regular meeting of the City Council of
tine City of Huntington Beach to order at 7 : 30 P .M.
Comeilu*n Present : Welch Gisler , 5terrert , L wbert Shi ley
�.n..�1i���•. . ..�u.....rr�.�.��.�..�.u.....wrn �w...Yw•.�... �� - iili._•ii_���.i�ri�.rwu.��
Cmunc t lien Absent : �None
i • • i i * y w # i i i i V i i . i • r i ♦ i i i • • i i • 1 • i • i i • i i i • • i Y i i i i . . . i #i • r i t i i i # i i '
I416jror Shipley atrneunced that this was the day and hour Bet for a public hearing
on Use Variance - UV #780 - Mrs . waiter lAmb , on property located 300 feet
north of Yorktown Avenue on the w08t aide of Brookhurst Street , and directod
the Clerk to read the legal notice .
The Clerk read not# c" of public hearing on use Variance #780 as published in
the Huntington Beach !News on July 15 , 1965 , setting the hour of 7 : 30 H .M. , or
an soon thereafter as possible , on Monday , the 2nd day of August , 1965 in the
Council Chamber of the Civic Center , Huntington Reach , for the purpose of
considering an appeal to the granting by the Planning Commission of Conditional
Exception -- UV P80 , to regulations of the Districting Ordinance to allow the
Construction of a mobile home park in the AI --Y General Agricultural District.
The Clerk informed the Council that fie had received a letter from Bruce V.
Sumer , Attorney with Kindel & Anderson , legal counsel for Mrs . Walter Lamb ,
requesting that the matter be continued until August 300 or September 7 , 1965 , +
as Mr. Sumner will be unable to appear on Mrs . ).ammb ' s behalf on August 2 , 1963.
The Clerk ,Mated that he had received no further communications or written pro-
tests to the Use Variance.
Playor Shipley declared the hearing open.
Mr. Milton Colton , Attorney with Kindel & Andersen , addressed the Council and
-requested that the matte. be continued to a later date.
Mr . ! s-K porter , Cit. • , addl:eiSed Lhie COt:(11_ il and rc ueseed Council to direct
the Building Department not: to issue Building NermiLs and further requesttd that
the hearing be continued until the regular meeting of September 7 , 19b5.
The Building Direccor informed ?Ir . Porter that the Ordinance Coc;v prohibited
i.asuance of building permits at this iLw* .
I.-Li
by Y.wb rf , iiconded by Gisler , Council continued action on Use
Variance f78O to an adjourned meeting to by field August 30e , 1965 at 7 : 30 P.M.
+So t i on afe l ed: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . i i . . . • • ♦ • . i . . • • ■ • • . i i 11 i
C4 motion by M „l, f�� .._ seconded by_ t:w„ ._.the regular meeting of the
City Council of the City u. lfunt iogton fiea#:h adjourned . Motion carried .
71ty C'Terk and ex-officio MaFf
of the City Council of the City
of F,untington Beach , California
ATTEST :
P u . o Mayor
Cit'.." y Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ►
County of Orange ) ns •
City of Huntington Beach
11 PAUI. C . JONES , the duly elected , yualifted and detinK City Clerk of the City
of Huntington Beach , Cal tfornin ; do hereby certify that the above and forogoing
to a true and correct excerpt from rninute'r of the City Council of said City at
their regular meeting field on the day nf_AWr&ur.I�._ ,
WI'T'NE:SS mar hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach t.hts..Lf,,,,_,day
a t-AMULL• 19,.kL.,,_.
Paul �+�C . Jo+trtres
Mw
of the City Council of the Cf,ty
of Hunting%4p B*ach , California
09 M9S/"III9M1 -
Received from Paul C. Jones , City Clerk, -check No. 773, in the
amount of $75.00, dated September 30, 1965, refund of check
pai;: as fee ror protest to UV #780.
i
i
Y01010401
DENIED
laiwrable Mayor and City Cvumil BY COUNCIL
City of mantington Bomb 1) R 404/ :lp
lbmt1aston leach, California K t h<.c�k,...F 1%• r 41
i
T �ter+ SEACH `'
Subject r Protest to the procedure o la .�....
with regard to VV 700.
Gentlemar
At the regular feting )f the *Antington Desch Planning Condasion an September
21, 1%50 the Commission approved a completely rtwiseet plot plan and sebeegsaat
rsriaioua to the conditions of UV 780 without the benefit of a public hearive
and advortiaea nt for nano, by a vote of 4-2 (1 absent). The action was caken
In regard to a letter from and the appearance of Mr. Frank S. Ayres on br*alf
of the applicant.
We herewith vigorously protest the action of the Co■mrissiou and the represent-
atives of the applicant, which we contend constitutes a cirenrention of re-
quired legal procedure, and oubmit the followiag as reasowr for this "est.
By their own intention and request for approval of an •ntiruly now plot plan,
they, the representatives of the applicant, heva said that the original plot
plan which UV 780 was grentod for is unacceptable, and therefore, by their own
action are rendering the original intent for the variance, and VT 780 itself,
null and void. In Plvnning Co+selasion session Mr. Kenneth ltsnalds stated, be-
fore mW vote was tak )a, that the very basis of granting a nee variame is the
plot plan and the conditions attached. here we ask of you: If the original plot
plan is no longer of effect, ghat is the basis for DV 780t by their own astiou
the Planning Comiasion has rondered VV 780 mall and void, and placed the a;'»
plicaut in a precarious position.
Therefore, it is of urgent necessity to all parties concerirsd, that the City
Commit cancel and revoke VV 700. Furthermore, the Cowmil should direcet the
Planning Director to request another application froze the applicant with the
iaclualon of the new plot plan along with another riling fee,as it wss the
applicant 's action that obviated the present plot plat. Vpon receipt of the
aforementioned from the applicant, aft. advertisawnt for a public hearing on a
new and different use variance should be placed. In addition, before sage
public hearing is hold, the City should produce the prelisrinsiy sails reporta,
Lu original or copy thereof, for all immediately surrounding 1-1 tracts sod
any other soils reports available for the 3% of Section 6-5-10 and the lK of
Sestion 5-4-10,frce other pilic agencies such as the Varstata Valley labool
District etc. , and soiaduct a egalotg cosparat:ive study of the nbsnsfaee soil
conditions in the sfurens. tiomw rreasain relation to the s»bourfaer soil
coalitions affeettag the property previously subject to IN 780. Previously,
the only sails report +eared was that of Tract 4744. Others mailable include
the Tlowmkr pip station, f i lee of the fountain Valley l+►1 Vol Distriet cad
the Orsage Comty ligbosy Depertrltnt. It is slaw noted that the soils rat
on Tract 4744 wood in a ptavlous stwdy is not the parelisi ouT soils report of
that property. As for as we leave been able to detersdne, the preliadnary
sells report bee besrn "vet o- tile" aims Ussember 1964 and we hold as unf i l led
re eipt from the City, dated levy 139 1l6S, for 3 copies of tb% title page of
Protest to Pl.aa ni.ag C owission Action an UV 780 (Coutimed)
Ae►ptawier 290 1963
this report. lily ue ask vhere those copies are, or for that enter, where is
t'larr pmli.ainasy soils report on T:avt 4744?
Witt reference to the %racy aforeme.__39aed rernom and %=nsreired questions
we jai■ submit the :fcessity of the City, Council to eaoael and revoke D7 780.
To do mW less will result to the following ocovtences r
Cris; it places the City in another gwstionable position on the basis
of probable illegal procedure
Twol it did not allow the residents, voters and tawpayers (to a ass►) to
done properly informed of mutters of public interest vhich ant direct-
ly affect them.
Three; the action of the Planning Comission strLkas at the heart of one
of our Vera► own democratic institutions - that of TIDE lDLlCg89 UNDik TBE
1 AW.
Therefore, its the inter*-r-s of the aforeatntiotte0 and those of the health,
safety, roacenionoe, economics, and the general wlfare of the people of this
cites we ask that the City Council initiate the action or actions correcting
aforementioned situation concerning UV 7-0.
Finally, we raiterat*; all of the oeeuronves affectir4 the stators of UV 780
vere actions by or on the behalf of the applicant. Uhat we are riveesting
in a rem1t of thoo►a actions.
i
Very truly yours,
tllaU MAR IMMOWURS ASSOCIATI0Ng M.
� �' � 1\'.�.\. .� ._.�_._ _ I_..- tie►+�,���'
Marcus M. Porter
r President
V -fF � w7 � • .
F' let Vice President
-. _.-.---.----- ifor the Board of Directors
f � `.
CITY OF
- - -- - -- -- - -
CALIFORNIA
�A11
(C
(a
October S. 1965
Y. Mrcus M. Porter, Resident
Glen Muir Rmiamers Association, Inc
I9l42 Providence Lane
A%M1.tnqton Beach, California
Door air$
The City Council of the City of Rmtington Beach, at their regular
westing told Monday, October 4, 1965, considered yvw protect to the
motion of the planning Ocamismion in approviM a revised plat plan
and subaeq%ent revisions to conditions to DV*790, and declined to
met a public hearing thnrew..
They directed that your fitirq fee of $75 .00 for said prateit be
refunded to your vrganisatioa. You wry pick up sane at tto office
of tto City Clerk at your convenience.
sincerely yours,
CI Ir OF A
Paul C. .YC048
City Clark
Pcjobwo
I
wcut&FRON
Cot=i 1 Chmber , City "It
ftatington Beach, Callferala
— ►mye called the regular sooting of the City c4mmil of
•t" City et SoatinNton beach to order at 7:30 P eN.
comwil■m Present :- ,k �. JAWANftrr_ �o ■�
Chilam Absent : 3tearrt
iiiii *ii *iiiiifiiii • iiii * ii •iif • iiiiiiiiiiili• iii • itii* Iiii0i•i
• 3'br Clock presented a latter of protest from the Glen Mar wa■wew ws
Asoociatiar to procedure of the Planni Commies ica in a is a treviaod
Plot Plan, owd revisions to conditions N 1�Y' #7� �ri.tbaut irat brrldl.� a
public braring, and requo*tin$ cancellation and revocation of sang.
r CityAttorne inform the Council that th
e be !'lawn C+qwstrrsi.ea�
y �#
drtondasti a tUt the cbanges were ainw ones , mikes it umnacessary for
Ca it to sit a public bearing on VV #730.
R1 t. Ni ftwll, 19791 9stuary Lane, City addressed the Cowncil and
stated that
=elt that any change al�ouid be considered by the bolding
of • public
ng.
W. Warr Nall 93$1 Hentscket Drive, City, addroused the Couacil and •
stated that be Volt the Plauning Commission dial nor have the right to
mske a deteroi.na t-ion that cbsngoo propoo ed were not "Jar.
On nation by Gisler, socwded b� L. iasebort Council devlisod to bold a
public bear ng on UV #780 and d rotted t� t the fi�►io►g fie of $73 .00 be
• refunded to Mr. Mock Porter, at the request of the City Clerk. Ionian
carried
i i i 1 i i i 0 1 0 i • i i i 0 0 i i i / • i i / i i 0 i 00 / 1 0 • 1 i i i i � 11 • i � � i i i i i i Y i 0 0 i i i • i i i
On motion by Gisler seconded by i .rt..the regular aeeting of the
City Council of the City of Huntington Bach adjourn,od. Motioo carried.
City Clerk and ON-o c e . ev
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, CalAtomia
A'i'"lM: RMId D. fihjZl2Z
nMayor
city *r
STATE Or CALIFORNIA )
Cmwty of Orange s■
City of Huntington Beach
1 , PAUL C. JOWS, the duly elected , qualified and acting City Cleric of the City
of Huntington Beach , California, do hereby certify that the abovo acid foregoing
In a true and cot rect excerpt from minutes of the City Council of said City at
their ro ular mrrot i ng held on che, JLLL�day of_.g&kg ,r■r , 19„U,,,,_.
WITWM my hand and seal of tho said City of Huntington Beach this.ii�L der
City Clerk and ex-orriele
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington beach , Callroralo
u .
P t
.I+wr s wwwaw.v LAW G r F I C Lt$
7 r,q:moia40s+
a4raif A.•ear X1�TDEL do ANDERS014
' .w7oi[.•eMafr
aiOM►..i+wMwta 1.09 e11ACLRf OFAICC
i[ala r.W&WITT
aar►wa w m4�eff.`NT 10141 NORTH •/1 OADWAY %to f1111011 %PORING 17111Cet
•ow a.+iTTa LOD AtIALL[t1,CALIFO1M11A 0"17
eAV.14 NLL►ar 6n14TA ANA,CALH 1111011A rtsi�!
.ruL tsaawpMt~% MAp1i0+1 G•!'ifl
eitae►a.CAk.OeN Klrfit+.r i•OJOI
OfUca w Wrrf+
AriaL+• rriL N161*1
:wr►L rwaRFt G^MLC K[►OI1i1ii
mtltN ■ +Ue Ga►
rafra.ietamarrlrit July G1, t:ArANCA
►nLW+i.►I adir
aarair* .Wert
Gwen a IfOAt
1965
.dw"at•a,wwiA,•
,Frew TO FILE NO.
w�,LiaiLw rtifOC Moiw
a C&NA.wItCM{La
fOr.e LL i ,a.Mai6
: 4144..�.�":444PLT 7632-00-01
0
W., -111,lwi►ia
■ILrir l81tLAwi
Jima^"tif wf LLLllwr
movie Oraawa L/LL7
6,La,AIII► ►Ream
fwOwia i.Gloom
wlC64"L f,CiLLI-m
w AoY+LO rt.A•
iAwl ..iw[L•G
Numbers of the City Council �
City Clerk _i_ww__._-__a,____ _
City or Huntington Beach AUG 3 0 05
City Hall Civic Cent*r
Huntington Beach, Californ.ia -
Uentleden:
Our office represents Mrs. Dorothy Limb who is
the owner of the property which is the subject of Use
Variance No. 780 which variance is the subject of an
appeal and is scheduled for hearing at 1:30 o' clo..cir P.P.,
on Monday, August 2t 1965. 1 am going to be out of down
on that date and will. be un&ble to appear on I'lros . Lamb's
behalf and, therefore . respectfully request that the matter
be continued either to August 30 for hestring at an adjourned
meeting, or September 7 at the regularly scheduled council
meeting. Because of the apparent interest in this mutter,
I suggest the Auguat 30 date.
Having been the counsel for Mrs . Lamb at a pre-
viously scheduled hearing on this same oAtter and being
the attorney in our office who is fsAi.liaar with the cir-
cumstanoes surrounding this use variance, it: is necessary
that I ptrounally handle this hearing rather than refer it
to some other counsel, thereby possibly jeopardising Mrs.
Lamb's case. If the council would prefer an adjourned
meeting at some date other than August 30, any date after
August 20 would be fine with doe.
Thank you for your courtesy and consideration In
this nattrri
Sincerely,
f r
r
WvCE W. s,9 1+
of Kindel. 6 Anderson
i
j
fArx
t