HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Variance 878 - Planning Commission Correspondence - OverTo •she Fionorab City Council: �"'"•
'.
1965. the Planning Commissions On.December 21. by a - 5
to 2 vote, Approved Use Variance #,:B?B to.allow an oversize
'
sign on , Baaoh Boulevard. We , who voted to deny graritfngt.thi.s
use variance, are bringing this to your attention. for the
following reasons:
1., No hardship on the property was domonst.rated by
the applicant. Economic hardship on the applicant is
not s valid reason for granting of use variances: The
ordinance states the hardship must be on the•lpnd or
building or premises.
2.. -Granting of this use variance constitutes a
speclal privillege for the applicant. Exceptions for
signs have not been granted to other•requests
.oversize
In the past.'
3. The;: Urban rand Institute study apeolfically
recommended against the proliferation of signs,on.�Eeaoh
Boulevard.,. The_prec®ndent established.by•allowing this
use variance. will endanger the ir` plementation, of "the
up -grading -of Beach Boulevard.
s
If it is t it t ,,,..
_ y e hat'an
the finding'of the Cit Coun
y n
error.in Judgement was made b the�Planning Commission,
a public hearing by the City Council w6ul be in order.
We refer, you to arbiole 963 of Division 9 for the ,
ordinance relating to conditional exceptions.
Respectfully' g' tmitted
He Ka an O.D.
y
Pl n+ nF , Comm I ne
f
vid Crabb
Planning Commissioner
F4 Ll
'•.
t
r
`
... N
,
•