HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdopt Resolution No. 2015-75 establishing Permit Parking Dis Dept ID Pw 15-066 Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date 11/16/2015
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 11/16/2015
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Fred A Wilson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Travis K Hopkins, PE, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No 2015-75 establishing Permit Parking District "T" affecting
residents on Softwind Drive and Angler Lane in Huntington Beach
Statement of Issue
Residents on Softwind Drive and Angler Lane have petitioned the City for a permit parking district
Financial Impact
The provisions of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 10 42 requires that the residents
choosing to participate in the residential parking permit district pay a proportionate share of the cost
to establish the district, making the district cost neutral to the City Typical costs include, but are
not limited to, installation of signs, curb markings, staff time to issue permits, and administrative
costs to create the district The cost to establish this district is estimated at $2,589
Recommended Action
Adopt Resolution No 2015-75, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
Establishing Permit Parking District "T" on Softwind Drive and Angler Lane Within the City of
Huntington Beach "
Alternative Action(s)
Deny the recommended action
Analysis
Public Works received a request to implement a permit parking district on the residential streets
Softwind Drive and Angler Lane The neighborhood is located between Edinger Avenue and Heil
Avenue just east of Springdale Street The residents are requesting permit parking due to the
parking impacts experienced on the requested streets and associated disturbances from the multi-
family unit tenants located near the neighborhood The residential permit parking has been
requested to be in place every day from Midnight to 5 a m
As required by Chapter 10 42 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, upon receipt and
examination of the residents' petition for permit parking, Public Works sent a ballot to each affected
property on Softwind Drive and Angler Lane to determine if a minimum of 75% of the property units
are in favor of the proposed permit parking district The returned ballot results were 77% in favor of
establishing permit parking Staff investigated the request by surveying the area at different times
and days of the week Staff determined that unrestricted parking issues, as specified in the
Municipal Code, exist on Softwind Drive and Angler Lane and recommends establishing permit
parking on those streets
Item 7. - I HB -42-
Dept ID PW 15-066 Page 2 of 2
Meeting Date 11/16/2015
Public Works Commission Action
Not required
Environmental Status
Not applicable
Strategic Plan Goal
Enhance and maintain public safety
Attachment(s)
1 Vicinity Map
2 Public Works Evaluation of Permit Parking Request
3 Resolution No 2015-75, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
Establishing Permit Parking District "T" on Softwind Drive and Angler Lane Within the City of
Huntington Beach
HB -43- Item 7. - 2
� ATTACH
i�
s9ti
F
�o
BOI
QAVE.
N
I Xv)
�N
McFADDEN AVE.
U w
EDINGER Q N N AVE.
J Z Qaf
Y HEIL Q a af 3 ui ¢ AVE. m
00 N 0 � z -
J p w O
Q Q N m WARNER ``' o AVE.
N 405
SLATER AVE. Q
w
m ,
TALBERT IAVE.
ELLIS AVE.
GARFIELD J _ AVE.
N v~i v~i v~i Q ~
YORKTOWN AVE.
PERMIT PARKING
DISTRICT 'T' GOB' ^ ADAMS AVE. N
af
PACIFIC � q INDIANAPOLIS AVE. o
o J O
ATLANTA J 0 = AVE.
U w m
OCEAN m Z HAM LTON AVE.
y�. BANNING
• AVE.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
® VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENT
t PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT "T"
Item 7. - 3 HB -44-
FATTACHMENT #2
Proposed Permit Parking Review
Softwind Drive and Angler Lane
The requested permit parking streets are Softwind Drive and Angler Lane A vicinity map of the
location is shown below
Q� f� PERMIT PARKING
BOLSA AVE ® REQJEST LOCATION
F
Mc FADDU 1 =A
c�
EDINGER a u AVE
J
a HEIL� ¢AVE a
Va-
4aWARNER AVE
SLATER AVE
405
TAWERT AVE
PACIFIC
� ELLIS AVE
GARFIELC _ AVE
IN A.,
YCIRKTQW9NV AVE
t
AVE
Y� INDIANAPOLIS AVE �
'Site J O
YCEAN ATLANTA< AVE
w <
w HAM LTOm A+IE
BANNING
AVE
VICINITY MAP
—NTS—
1 Page
HB -45- Item 7. - 4
E�
W,
�aowa
� E
imp
ip
Figure 1. Aerial photo of Softwind Drive, Angler Lane and the surrounding area.
Item 7. - 5 H'B -4O-
Field survey of parking conditions:
The following information is from three separate field reviews of the area The times of day the streets
were surveyed was based on discussions with the requesting residents.
Field Survey 1:
Monday,Aug 17, 2015, 3:00 PM
Street # Parked Parking Capacity % Occupancy
Vehicles (approx)
Softwind Dr (Springdale—Angler) 3 3 100%
Softwind Dr (Angler—w/o Woodstock) 18 49 37%
Angler Ln (Softwind —Montecito) 5 11 45%
Angler Ln (Montecito—Palisade) 3 11 27%
Montecito Dr (Angler—e/o Angler) 4 7 57%
Field Survey 2:
Wednesday,Aug 19, 2015, 6:20 PM
Street # Parked Parking Capacity % Occupancy
Vehicles (approx)
Softwind Dr (Springdale—Angler) 3 3 100%
Softwind Dr (Angler—w/o Woodstock) 16 49 33%
Angler Ln (Softwind —Montecito) 8 11 73%
Angler Ln (Montecito—Palisade) 3 11 27%
Montecito Dr (Angler—e/o Angler) 5 7 71%
Field Survey 3:
Thursday,Aug 20, 2015,6:15 AM
Street # Parked Parking Capacity % Occupancy
Vehicles (approx)
Softwind Dr (Springdale—Angler) 3 3 100%
Softwind Dr (Angler—w/o Woodstock) 14 49 29%
Angler Ln (Softwind —Montecito) 8 11 73%
Angler Ln (Montecito—Palisade) 6 11 55%
Montecito Dr (Angler—Woodstock) 5 7 71%
3 1 P a g e
HB -47- Item 7. - 6
Anaiysis:
Based on the field observations and discussions with the residents organizing the request for permit
parking, the most significantly recurring impacted areas are along the north side of Softwind Drive
between Springdale Street to just east of Angler Lane, and along the east side of Angler Lane between
Softwind Drive and Montecito Drive. These areas are shown on Figure 2. These locations appear to be
impacted by the vehicle owners of residents from, the nearby apartment complexes,
i�
..
4 W- 4-
11
AM
AL
in
kka
�, xx
� _a �
Y
Figure 2. Parking Impacted Areas.
To account for the potential movement of the commuter vehicles to locations just outside the
recurring impacted parking areas, the district is recommended to be placed beyond the most impacted
areas on the streets indicated below:
• Softwind Drive between Springdale Street and just west of Woodstock Lane, and
® Angler Lane between Softwind Drive and just south of Palisade [give
Number of addresses in parking district = 39
The proposed permit parking area is shown in Figure 3.
WN
l;
20
�. �
m kk _Fri ma' s
aro
I _
�
I . �z :. H
4 ��4 z
MIN
#C" A 3" �lP 01,
MMALb�� la fib' lta`�,.<iVr
.cy _� a�f V �. .-r� �t. �? y1�'
uq
' a �r,�
AU 4
AM
-X t o RvA
y
a
46,
M
2,1
7-1
a} ,^ `w - ,fit � �e
' e r e
WIN
"`a � �• v� t u
a ,
a
144
eg"
-A,
4
7
AN
"T
'b
Figure 3. Proposed Permit Parking Area.
5 B =
�;_ Item 7. - �
Other concerns from the residents:
One of the primary concerns expressed by residents is the community/social impacts resulting from
the commuter vehicle parking in the neighborhood. Complaints of excessive trash, noise, rudeness and
late night activity were all cited along with typical parking impacts. Residents believe that all of these
impacts are caused by commuter vehicle parking and not a result of tract resident use of the on-street
parking. The following photos were provided by residents demonstrating the impacts that can be seen
visually. Clearly some of the complaints cannot be fully substantiated by staff since they involve
personal interaction with motorists over a significant amount of time.
Commuter vehicle littering on the neighborhood streets
I a.
z
4�
�.
1
1
4
rfa"�t
kz-
a
��r,�� a 2 `• a.�-. b - ��.""
a
t '�� •� ,emu; 0 C �. W. ii
pp,
Crowded parking and parking across driveways blocking driveway visibility and curb space for bias
on trash day
I
m
a
E
xs r
m
S S
Item 7. - 10
F= P
,
y
!
t
K
A
z
5
ay
9
� a �
Item 7® - 11 s
ATTACHMENT #3
RESOLUTION NO. 2 015-7 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING PERMIT PARKING
DISTRICT"T" ON SOFTWIND DRIVE AND ANGLER LANE
WITHIN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter
10 42 allowing the establishment of parking districts in residential areas under certain conditions
and;
The citizens of the residential streets known as Softwind Drive and Angler Lane have
petitioned for establishment of a permit parking district on Softwind Drive and Angler Lane; and
The Director of Public Works reviewed the petition, sent a ballot for further consideration
to residents of Softwind Drive and Angler Lane, and caused an investigation which reasonably
established that:
l. A minimum of 75%of the Property Units on Softwind Drive and Angler Lane are
in favor of the proposed Permit Parking District; and
2. Unrestricted parking creates a situation in which the subject streets cannot be used
for parking by Residents or their guests because Commuter Vehicle parking
unreasonably and regularly interferes with the use of the available street parking;
and
3. Unrestricted parking creates a situation where Commuter Vehicles or their
occupants produce significant sources of health, safety, or welfare concerns.
Therefore, the Director of Public Works has found the requirements of Chapter 10.42 to
be reasonably fulfilled, and determined that the Permit Parking District will not affect other uses
of on-street parking,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby
resolve as follows
Permit Parking District"T" is hereby established to include Softwind Drive and Angler
Avenue, effective every day from 12 a.m. to 5 a in
15-4985/128075 doc 1
Resolution No . 2015-75
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 16 t h day of November , 20 15
gyp,u
or
REVIE ,APPROVED APPROVED AS F
YV ity Manager City Attorney
Ilu'�
IN IATED AND APP VE
Director of Pub 'c Works
15-4985/128075 doc 2
Res. No. 2015-75
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, JOAN L FLYNN'the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of
Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby
certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven, that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a Regular meeting thereof held on November 16, 2015 by the following vote
AYES: Posey, O'Connell, Katapodis, Hardy, Sullivan, Delgleize, Peterson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
City Cla and ex-officicVClerk of the
City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California
Stachalski, Bob
From Patrick Tapley[pltapley@gmail com]
Sent Sunday, November 15,2015 3 39 PM
To Stachelski, Bob
Subject Proposed Residential Parking Restriction Softwind Dr
To Whom It May Concern
I received the proposal to have the public street parking privatized for the use of the residents of the
neighborhood My personal opinion I see no problem with this,however the upkeep of the road should be
treated like my property where I park I live in a gated community mth parking restricted to the
residents and that is it We also pay to have it maintained and paved on a regular basis,thus there is no
involvement in the city or other people paying for the road We have a private parking funded and
maintained by private funds
Should the residents feel they need to restrict the parking for any time during the day for permit only
parking they should shoulder the costs of maintaining the road We do not privatize the use while
socializing the cost in this nation,we offer the ability to privatize however they should maintain the road
for their use
People will use the road to travel on regardless as is their given right(SCOTUS-Crandall v
Nevada, 73 US 35)and the road should be maintained as such Some unincorporated roads inside
Huntington Beach(Old Pirate Ln)have very expensive homes and their roads are maintained by their
residents,I would venture to guess gated communities would do the same I see no reason for them to not
have the ability to make the parking for their area private-neither do I see any reason while restricting
parking for the residents of Huntington Beach for the residents to also pay for the maintenance on land
they can't use
I realize that something lice this has happened previously on Plymouth Lane,and it was approved
However,that doesn't mean it was corrector lawful I can look at the previous Kim Kramer's downtown
initiative that was approved to ban pai king for residents from the previous City Council,only to have it
reversed and taken away as lawsuits loomed If residents wanted to,I would venture to guess that this
approved pai king on Plymouth Lane would be revolted as well
Thank you for your time
i
Patrick Tapley
6100 Edinger Ave#128
Huntington Beach
714-287-2859
Stachelski, Bob
From: a warren [anhwarren@gmail com]
Sent. Monday, November 16, 2015 12 04 AM
To: Stachelski, Bob
Cc: Rob W
Subject. Fwd Residential Permit Parking on Angler Lane
Last email was incomplete. Here is the complete letter
Dear Mr Stachelski
My husband and I live at 16302 Angler Lane, which is a little further down from the proposed area According
to the map on the letter that we received, our concern is that the proposed area doesn't include our block on
Angler, and it should for the following reasons
First of all, by only sectioning off the affected area on Angler up to Palisade will bring the apartment parking
problem to further down our block on Angler,just like it did to the current residence north of us on Angler and
Softwind The permit parking should extend to all of Angler, so that we can prevent it from happening to us
Our area is close enough for the people living in the apartments to want to park where we are It will save the
city from costly changes later on when the same parking problem arises, like it did on Ballentine and Softwind
Another reason to extend to our block is that our sidewalk is being fixed right now It wouldn't be too much of
a problem to put up the signs right now On a positive note, extending the permit parking also may generate
revenue for the city if someone violates the permit
Finally, it's a traffic nightmare in the morning when I drive down on Angler around 7am to take my children to
school We lived in this track for about 10 years, and it has gotten worse each year It use to never be that
busy in the wee hours in the morning Right now, it's busy street like Edinger by Bella Terra No residence
wants that in front of their house For that reason,the permit parking needs to extend to the end of Angler We
don't want that traffic to extend to our block.
Thank you for fixing the current parking problem, but don't let parking problem come down our block
Anh&Rob Warren
i
Charles Messenger
6100 Edinger Ave #123
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Dear Mr Stachelski
This residential parking permit idea is a good idea in theory The only problem with the idea is that people need a
place to park I need to work tonight,so unfortunately I can't make the meeting However,this is all good and fine,
but residences in the immediate area should have the right to apply for a permit Not only the homeowners
Best regards,
Charles Messenger