Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHuntington Beach Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Study Ses - Background Research and Existing Facilities Fj _ - - -- ,,, PARKS NI RECR T I N MA STE R PLAN rAN Public Involvement ;Outreach f'kh+O D t h Methods s Tjf ' 4 a rTV F ��A C i3F71u Py Fhu-!'S....l -1.. Demat-id Needs Recommendations Defensible Huntington ton Beach facti urnaar Y Facility Demand .. + ,fi facilAy Prioritization Recommendations SUPPLEMENTAL 1 commuNiCATION r MeetingRj ar isN i, Msanur = Q w GU LC v W uj - Jui w J. cm-f l - _ ... .... _ - t vl" aAll E,- —`✓ a st M y l mg" all Ill ON_,1014 ;. �`°w � � � � I N �, �� � �', •' III�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIuII 71 00 . -�°•.,1 ���� �����..- � i, w� �. ' (c� Pik �= IlluuuuuulVlluul' I I � '' I Illull� 111111111111111161 Ji;. '�' .'I,VVII IIIIIIIVIIIII I- II pru°I Iv a ``ice ✓i t� _.ems ,�: IIII IIIIIG , r�r u�lll I , � = �'�-m'��'�. _ GIIIIII�IVllllmW a 4 Vilnl I � rl. �IGiIiIlulllul ills rlr b - 41P I�uuu a IuNI IrM1 n wld� uIIIIIII4IIIIlY IIhGuuplli uu " � �mII�IIIIIIII� I Vur IH� rydlll rr mIuIIC IIIIIII 1 ♦ry mmuupul� ql IIII 'I ; � f�y �y�.cl muuxuuuuuulV tl� ril ,,- � �,� I al"ncluulr IL, ulumllilllV 1� hlllu m r� ryrylwlllrululu Ih�ullll�lIl s '`"�w :� �PIuI��IIlu1G II�IVu�VV9p II ul IIGIII RAI ��I �I I �III�IIIu4l ,� rl ,e IGIuuplGuuuuw uuuullllppllll �gIpIIIm�IIG�NRulll � n I rlu I� Gull � IIIYVJhVllll@ hluuuhlVumu �IIuti upy hlululluT I p„ �A { ,_ ' ♦—7,777 F., t� r, , t � i ti L , a t �l ;4 ra o Ewa F..i e 3t� r w "4 v { City Gym Foal �. Outreach M Sports Org, Questionnaire Executive Interviews Community rksh s Community Characteristics Sports Organizations C011111-1milty Prioritization Community Phone Survey METHODOLOGY -TOc-plione survt•y aFf 300 Hurt609401e 8eaetr 'JA A, tlrr aa•rrnr-r aJirrg rlr rxi arpr„rrrl,us C-,-.uJ S..err Recreavon Facility Usage houscholLis.,elr tted..t randolr-i• 0 at v,n rs�,xr r1,rf Quail hr-coieyc[l"If thal Ihrry vv l'ht,SrJmtrr:url MOSE 1,lSed RV(redtioli r.1x1111.x7 rctervsorrhny ryvc•r 7U3 rtisrdrnle- Z irr11J l,tW dnd tl,e,ricvet.uprrar•rit o'f rar.�park Recrea'tlun Prngreft'r Usa e O'cralt ru.."Jixr rrl rrrrxr If 0-S t1"..,.it lhr. +nd rr;rvot..Sn Rccr.talxun At l'rvit'y7 Par'lot patron 95%.Confidence Level + Facrlrties Deti,ed Mc st €nlrruiv wu taurk plara•In Dvt,-nett±•r 2014. -1341>,v 4 rl 2000 and 2010, i'1ur5I[r)(J a)ri 9 ,Jkh I Jl nr-w cd a Hru,go'drns Desiivd P.1uti1 0 � ❑.I in[rr:ass r r lfupUlahurr,watlx tler harjlta l r1:c,v..11r irr lha V 110plttatanir aT ape 65 and Older ... _ r: IL - • 6n a99 _ ` 4°o yruwilr iaw€euuscltulrty wifhurrt cixrtclr r_rl rner ca ny tlr�- 'ram ---- - - —:.. total of h xu�r h lti^,veilhaurl dtilrlrrn undr elj9' 1F9 Ew 70'4O lMd 0 9 .. '� -Htrnfiror�lu it H tth.rls,y haA€:e Huh 1 rtof.rV iiryerca;<r;rir c:rltr rr�rf �a - W -- drve°r�rly x°drltr 339u of ttnwart-raslxi.tn,rgrT Non-While. .viBlr .,.t�.,o...��. .. 101^'u Hispanic,gird 11%Asian tr.:ruyvhutcf's adchwu to 1he lr,xl.al trr arlydilrur).. 344n nl IuxrSehr Jd%lArac re-;rafr---d in tf,.e Cil•y for river 26 years or mnre. m l racteristics What makes Huntington Beach a great place to live, work, and play? Community Characteristics Open Space/Reach/flit rks/Recreati n"al Activities Friendly Population/Staff/Small Town Atmosphere Shopping/Restatirants/Services In our City What are the issues or trends that may be negatively impacting those in-iportant community characteristics ? Issues or Trends Higher Density/Overdevelopment Traffic/Safety/Bike and Walking Access V Maintenance/Money to Maintain City Parks Mok What role can can the City play in addressing ISSLIeS? City's Role Maintaining Our Parks/Maintenance Issues f . More Money for Parks/Increase the Budget +�...... More Outreach and Comniunication r Sports ganations iz What are the top shorts facility needs in Huntington Beach? Sports Facility Needs Best? - - Complex Aquatics� 1� �' Sports Complex Pickle Ball Complex High School Fields Multi-Use Gelds Baseball Facilities for 13-14 Year Olds Worst? Q rst? Swimming Pool / Aquatics Qpl-jortunities for meeting Current and future sports facility needs in the City? Sports Complex f Underutilized Opportunities School District and City Cooperation/Coordination Budget Ballot Initiative-Band Measure Most iniportant iniprovetnents you would make to sports facilities? Improvements ,Aquatics Facility/Center Upgrade/Update Existing;Sports Facilities Access to School District Facilities /Property Commun *lty Pr *1orit'l* zation What are the Tap Recreation Programs Needed in the City of Huntington Beach? w • Swimming �t = 4 • Junior LifegUards • Water Pala • Pickle Ball • Ocean Safety What are the Top Recreation Facilities Needed in the City of Huntington Beach? • Aquatics Con-iplex 1 Center • Pickle Ball Courts • Utilize School Sites v • Bike Path 1 K-Rail for Safety • Inside the Outdoors 1 Shipley Mature Center Community Phone Survey METHODOLOGY Telephone survey of 300 Muntingtan Beach tA As these emerging demographic trencls ire explained and Reereatimi Facility Usage l-wouseholds selected at random, IM discaissed, it ivill hecome clear that there will he -Jgnificant Most Used Recreation Facility representing over 765 residents. rn}paact,, on current facilities and the development of now hark Recreation r)rograrn Usage Overall margin of error of ,1- 5.8114, at the LU and recreation facilities. Recreation Activity Participation 95% Confidence Level IIw Facilities Desired Most Interviewing took place in December 2014. [1e(ween 2000 and 2010, Hunfingtof) Beach experienced a Programs Desired Most 0.2% increase In pop+ilaat crn, with ttae lrigt+est growth Intf+e population at age 65 and older. in that sar11(, time period, Hrintington Beach expaciienced a °` -- 4r`i� growth in laouscholds rnrithorrt children, in[re+sirup the tot,'rl of hollSehOlfl; withNit children rnaclor age 18 to 70%. Huntington Beach al,o I+ad a Substantial increase in cultural - © diversity with 33% of households heing Non-White, with w, �T 18% Hispanic, and 11% Asian Iaouseholds adding to the - ... - total. W -- • Ir6 crddltlr3rl, 34°so of Huntington Beach laouselrcalcls have resided in the City for over 26 years or more. �y `•--�...,..�'S;�c�-�a�^l ;�.�i ..'�s � Y ' �� i i �r LL L* ,,,�i• 1 _ Z -:h wa.V1.��kn r-I- ,� `,- .,,y�_�'7S. �'. w {r ",'nit—�='Y..� .6K'• j'� 1t'�K��'�FTC � �d' " *F ' - i ?'ye 14 �;�r 'ea. !r 3 K pie r"j1�44 , S,k e of GU wte a 4M �t `-� p r __ -.e. Z.1��� � T �.i.li.� ��"'x,�3�;. '��ft� i+r�r��fldl,�l� t''df' �r,.7v �'15..�""��p x�b'�-]t,.l'-},i•� i 2015 Facility Demand Per Capita Peak Day Design Number of Facility Need Participation Demand Turnovers Standard Facilities Ratio - City of Activity Days/Year (Participants) Per Day for Facility Demanded* Huntington Bch. Softball.- Organized Youth 0.7 589 3x 24 players/field 11.2 fields 1/17,750 pop. Organized Adult 4.0 830 2.6x 30 players1field 13.3 fields 1114,900 pop. Baseball-. Organized Youth 1,9 2,078 5x 24 players/field 216 fields 1/9,150 pop. Soccer Organized YOUth 6.0 5,885 4,9x 24.5 players/field 61,3 fields 1/3,250 pop- Lacrosse Organized Youth 0.4 131 4x 28 players/field 1-5 fields*** 1/135,750 pop. Picnicking 9.2 2,807 1.5x 4 personsitable 468 tables 1/424 pop. Tot Lots/Playgrounds 9.3 5,676 5x 20 persons/hour 56.8 areas 1/3,500 pop. Swimming (Public Pool) Recreational" 8-6 2,572 3x 25 sq ft/swimmer 3.5 pools 1/56,850 pop. Tennis 43 1,337 8x 3 persons/court 55.7 courts 1/3,550 pop. Indoor Basketball: Organized Youth 01 513 5x 18 players/court 57 courts 1/34,750 pop. WalkingfJogging/ Running-Public Trails 61 .0 7,061 1.5x 90 persons/mile 523 miles 1/3,800 pop. Bicycling-Public Trails 33.4 17,516 5x 30 bicycles/mile 116.8 miles 111,700 pop. Facility Surplus / Deficit (-) 2015 Change in Cumulative Facility Surplus'I BU1,1dout Surplus/ Deficit (-) Facility Surplus/ Deficit 2015-20335 Deficit Softball Fields Organized 'Youth -1 2 fields -0-5 fields -1 .7 fields Organized Adult -0.3 fields -2.0 fields -2.3 fields Baseball Fields-. Organized Youth 0.4 fields 1 .4 fields 1.7 fields Soccer Fields Organized Youth 6.7 fields -0.7 fields 6.0 fields Lacrosse Fields Organized Youth 0,0 fields -0.5 fields -0.5 fields Picnic Tables -179 5 tables 5.0 tables -174,5 tables Tot Lots/Playgrounds 221.2 areas 3.1 areas 25.4 areas M* Swimming Pools (Public) Recreational -2.6 pools 0.0 pools -2.6 pools 400= Tennis Courts -122 courts -8.0 Courts -20.2 courts Indoor Basketball Cts.: Organized Youth -0.7 courts 0.6 courts -0.1 courts Walking/Jogging Paths (mi.) -41,9 miles -7.8 miles -49.7 miles *w Bicycling Paths (mi.) -37.5 miles -5.4 miles -42.9 miles 11111101� ! i ty SU ary Faci i 'd I i4 JT-f Mdll Y[:;r'i 101,10,11 Quantitative W) U,M1.Kf_1T,1'I'IVk k2 91IR1 l-P,x'rlt�l;l%5 c .. - _ Phone Survey City of Huntington.Beach r � Z Y G F' Demand geed (Current ,1 Future) Facility Needs Summary �� � � _ s " 4 �� p ops r 11 i. ;_ IF I, ir!t. it .7:; is ,, •r x x a x x x x x rirh I l 1 EII x I B s ,II 11 i5i u•Cif 7p I'.7=l:'euu,14 X R ro g ra F l i Needs R X X 3 Program I x x % ti� _ -_-._.— --- - - _._ _ _ Yt Recreation Treads x % ��, , flnee.[•4, x Phone Survey (want) Illlr•l i..iv - - - x t x x CVI-,filer Y , ........-=: Executive Interviews Sports X _—__ _. — .. Organization Questionnaire I It[iTl�a l'(l lvn f.�^rl[FI Ilr H�ilti:e I.tiiti 'x 1 hk 1% II x x X Aquatics k ti 1FI II r•@i�I 1 ll t@y,H I @ I .'k�'i I c ;.e=S._ % % '� x �x .—.. x x 4 ',krsfmulto 4 $i rSl..u.,Cc•Lt@ci „_._-�-- x . x X x i.ilr'•N Lwr- Cunie'r �_-- x i s@�41t@rJtvare _ X....-. rx- x �' k54u�rC.i@li i 'i, ( id 5 $x1 ) 5 _ x .i x Ioln N 9 l x x x x ' Total number I l;ti;f 1,I'I�19••;9 x f--� � I L 11}llall{Ir I Y log x % ti Y h 7 of gaols that T - identified need FacII * tyi Prioritization Highest Priority Facilities Aquatics Complex 11 Bike Paths 11 Gymnasium 8 Tennis Courts 8 High Priority Facilities Walking/ logging/ Running/ Hiking Trails 7 Basketball (Indoor) 5 Lighting of Fields 4 Pickleball Court (Indoor/ Outdoor) 4 Picnic Tables (Picnicking) 4 Senior Center 4 Softball Fields 4 Recom en ations Short Term RECOMMENOADONS fUNPINC.KEY rsrimated kONDINGpt Y yFr)len s I FilridinF S4ure,y,) {see halowl Coen A DtvelCjptj Irrtp ICr FOJrJ H- Cm pol,i re Spu r,cr;heips Conrad Park - - G I?c'reltrpel Sp�rq,yl 7t,.r..;rari-nt I. Ca^rtl6t dles of far Lcll,tatit7n . Add 1• 1,1 51 Lm) —_--_.. - - - L 'G enprdl f unrf 1 Fhrnrie Davenport Beach Palk . Add P r roh,I:or h.-r,r.,es. [D.[; Sil 3Cp Fa- Nan"prr flt nrpr)u M:r,JJ N.. S�Ir iax OI sr wq Well Park F. Y?tlhallC/IProvil.•.2!1drtrwr,.tlrp,..f ilattc'is.If f, R.. Sd r•,IC P,!'.a•Of SUJf IllL farad Play;,snarl 51NAIJ ce RIP— C.P.l, F. Gr ants'C F786 M. u:,ra,Group Cuntr'bu Lull•, I Ru il: r msrete p.-.� $1 tiy:] I G. Gran[s•f albli[>tiR,enur:,d:fl'd,,[ Pr-"Ir:;l,l 1.urns N. S[I'Iurl Gisll u.t 1u.lh use(:evrrlr )e.t:;r=s I"rer^fln.lFlnp.Ind Rca-rval i i C,:y;,) [7eillt,si+.•.:1 I axis Drew Park . Vai54'fuii ll t Ou el 11wwal or Rrinra tiara l.,FF,! iy Arm oiitl — Ender Park Term r,:ise Editun Park - - - - • luiry,rilon iyal+rm oJpyadl(-.dIld Re9il5MIOrl i,.D.F•G.I,k•1) 51,500,001) i1M r � '"L•+ __ _ __ • ParklnR lol RO.IIUVJtIUI'I •.,)fcl:Slurry SINI r'R.KI Fl f • Iei,msC ' tREno all')' ,1 fan 111111 1 a ) 1 r • Cancrl•[ W,'n[kway Playgrc 6+, rh1,11O rlion • i.nn;.rrrunlly L rlkey alld ltit,ans un `.4,ni:N CAD wry "" _. �,;_� I#, `a` ••. F arq Aar Park :.y.1••.:-[-I k.''anP rand RF<n OV`siren. C II.Sr u ' Fintey Park Than. I(1;pT 11 sysgerrs tlppraS7r.,fled Re,i3Va1,Gn French Palk f ? None Gibbs Park 11 t • le,, PE a: L.I I:pl Sy t" Je en y, a d R Glsler Park C&r:r.I'It'WLI]kw.ry C.F),G W aula Pau':w�l:Int 9ie.,r,vatldln S1:.SU..ri:[1 - .+IAN ti 71erYand Irrrpanon 'NJ NM Glom View Park ' TLJ I K ,.1m01. C,D,6 151=t Golden Vlew Park Twi,rr;l Irrikatwn Ra,lcnr w, C,D.'G 52 LIG,Clrxa - - Green Park . r4rav Fareaf Park r Par s lap I Slµny C.p,.6 �75,�:;� �^ AMWO iLost Consi* derati* ons Project Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Year Year Year Year Year Year 15/16--- 17/18TfF 18,/19 19/20 20/21 General Park Renovation $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 sq00,000 swo,000 $900,000 Park Specific Renovations Bluff Top Park $3,500,000 Edison Park $7,100,000 Harbour View Park $ 850,000 Central Park $4,700,000 Lake Park Marina Park $2,000,000 Murdy Park $4,810,000 Bartlett Park $1,17S,000 Worthy Park $1,301,500 LeBard Acquisition 667,000 $667,000 $667,000 LeBard Design/Construction $1,262,000 Total $S,30S,SOO $1,S67,000 $1,567,000 $27,360,000 Acquisitions Burke School TBD TBD TBD TBD Gisler School TBD TBD TBD TBD Kettler School TBD TBD TBD TBD Hamilton/Magnolia-38.3 TBD TBD TBD Ac r .. Background Research and Existing Facilities WNW RECREATION � It � , � y � }��.i (J•• - PARKS AND ATIO MAS]' I: I [,AN Public Involvement. } r s �3 k ' �.°r si urt roe�a Re h�l Methods etig cs ' - r,.1• { IMy+ ljy;- F - k C. l +lew3 06 lJlnl ° rrlYtd ', Den-iand deeds 1 Recommendations _�� H n fl ng,dnn Bench Fiscillty Sumiji:ity N %acilay Demand t Facility Prioritization Recommendations