Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Huntington Central Park - Miscellaneous Documents 1982-1989
' REQUESI FOR CITY C0UNC1L .CTI0N October 16, 1989 Data Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council 1. Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator 4 PrapRred by: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Se AW a 1 kb)ect: HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK ENCYCLOPEDIA LOT tR ( Consistent with Council Policy? Yes I l Now Policy or Exeep Statemtrt of issue, Recommendation.Analysis, Fundlnq Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE There is a need to begin the process to take possession of the remaining encyclopedia lots in Huntington Central Perk for the development of a golf f course. RECOWENOATION Approve the expenditure of $40,000 from the Park Acquisition and Development Fund for the appraisals and litigation guarantee work to acquire the encyclopedia lots in Huntington Central Park. i ANALYSIS At its September 5, 1989 meeting, City Council approved the development of a golf course in Huntington Central Park. In order to move Ahead with this project, it is necessary for the city to take possession of the remaining 106 encyclopedia lots not currently owned by the city. ( The city needs to have the land appraised and the litigation guarantee work y completed to Ascertain the land value and to detemnine the legal owriidrs. Tito city will then establish Just compensation and begin suLnaitting offors to acquire the tuts from the legal oNners. .If, after a reasonable negotiation period or due to title problems, the city is unabla to effect ownership of the property, resolutions of necessity may have to be requested from City Council to allow development of the golf course to commence. FAWN% SOURCE Park Acquisition and Development Unencumbered Fund Balance. ALTERNATIVE ACTION Delay acquisition of property until the agreement has been finalized with the golf course developer, ATTACMENT Location Map liri8.rib 0106El68 no anx I. ` REQUES'FOR CiTY CCUNCILO�CTION October 2, 19B9 Date ------ Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Couk, City Administrator o-a- 0'.P� Prepared by: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Services 8Y COUNCIL HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK ENCYCLCPEDIA LOT ACQUISI-i , *N Subject: p .�:. .fr Conaiitent with Council Policy? 14 Yes ( j New Policy or Excvtion i I btatement of Issue, Fie.ommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Altornnt;ve A_uons, Atta,hrnents: ! STATEMEKT OF ISSUE- There is a need to begin the process to take possession of the remaining encyclopedia lots in Huntington Central Park for the d-velopinent of a golf course, RECOMMENDATION i Approve the expenditure of M O,OCO from the Park Acquisition and Development. Fund for the appraisals and litigation guarantee work to acquire the encyclopedia lots in Huntington Cent-al Park for the purpose of developing a golf course. AMAI.YSIS At its September 5, 1989 me-eti ng. City Council approved the development of a golf course in Huntington Central Park, In order to move ahead with this protect, it is necessary for the city to take possession of the remaining 106 encyclopediA lots not currently owned by the city. the city needs to have the land appraised and the litigation guarantee work completed to ascertain the land value and to determine the legal owners. The city will then, establish just compensation and begin submitting offers to acquire the lots from the legal owners. If, after a reasonable ne otU tion period or dote to title problems, the city is unable to affect ownership of the property, resolutions of necessity may have to be requested from City Council to allow development of the golf course to crrmrence. RIMING SOURCE Park Acquisition and Development Unencumbered fund Balance. ALTERNATIVE ACTION Delay acquisition of property until the agreement has been finalized with the golf course developer. AT[ACOWNT Location Map Mill:rib 07D6E/68 ►1011e� ' ' i r 1 BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC � P,%,EPRODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO AGE AND C01NIDITION OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS r e is �. �: '✓7.?,j'�ifir.i w.,ry,��r,.���.M.�� Zl,.�:4,�f/ "t��.��rl�'ii+�:y�,S ir:Sa� :.r.. ,�:�/�,w.'L `�'M T �.t.\•'�:•�fr�1r��.�, '� y' MAN cr, ' r �• •' •tip •t•arent awa• • .•, ' ' 4�� , rox. 10.6 A cre� - nEMOVATI DeVe p L..W, e s t--'o f s'•' '�lr1J • AMIY TEAT@A r y ! ,t FMALT ?t`/+L 1 Cf SIAfILk�! � � • � KING LOT .... O AC�1C5 Wt •4• •��/ 1,. =7 A •`�- �'. � PARKING SPA •� `� • •/• ^1 . {.. ,_LIAR t• t Jf do irj/ i N/.Ia171TIM11M[ .... � •' ..Y � y r/ y ••� • w � ••�••N � w41j ... ♦ r 8 . _ r •tir, S • r!� •— as ENCYCLOPEDIA LOTS •• ' Potential Golf Courts . Mushroom Farm• (25- A JA • GENTRAUR, RK MASTERPLAN CITY OF HUNTINGTO . BEACH /_Z?a A1,.V C'owr 500w. • REQUEC' FOR CITY COUNCL ,ACTION Date August 21 , 1989 A' PROVED BY CITY COtmoll, Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrat;Xet- _. PraiperedwY: Melvin M. BOMnan, Director, Community Ser CITYCL2ZX Subject: HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-22 Consistent with Council Policy? I ) Yas ( ) New Policy or Exception Statement of issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE There is d need to approve the negative declaration regarding the proposed Huntington Central Park's sixteen-acre development west of Golden West at Talbert. RECOMENDATI7N Certify Negative Declaration No. 89-22 for the development of sixteen Acres in Huntington Central Park west of Golden hest at Talbert. ANALYSIS As part of the 1988 California Wildlife Coastal and Park Land Conservation Sois•i Act grant process for the development of the sixteen acres in Huntington Central Park as open/passive parkland •-ith additional parking and rest room facilities, an environmental assessment must be completed. This development proSect was approved by City Council as part of the per capita section of this grant program on January 3, 1989. The environme-16,31 assessment; has been accomplished along with the required thirty-ddy review which ended August A, 1989. City Council certifies the negative declaration as prepared by the Community Development and Community Services Departments. This document will then be sett to the State Department of Parks and Recreation to complete the next step in the qrant process. FUNDING SOMCE N/A ti ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Direct staff to reevalu to environmental report as to its use. ATTACHWITS 1) NogAtive Declaration No. 89-22 2) Location Map FAs R, Sp 9! 5RI 0105E/64 } �a��sa'HJ/0��`�9NIlNT1M all*Also paMis>IR i Ina 4M } ta11 tal &%%A 0fnAft0o"a, 1400 2' ou suwt. 3rorta 111, jW41MOMD, 4 9Stl4 - 116,40-Mu 2tw it71t aalw airs or aiQt�o, s0 wsaaaarm Ma"Wr WA49=1 OM War s 1. .j. , ,,U,,Huji naton Central Par Ad i ti on -Negative Dec lar �.�,Ng, 2. L-d Av-v, ri_� ty__nf ingto",Qach _'l. m,t.ts Pw"M1 �el�y Main 2000 Hsi% 5t,rget lot city,flumtingun H@aLfl. Orange M. 31P,. 92548 - 1t. rto 1.(714) 536-5271 cutstu = 1. CA&MYl.Qr_u--- w, arrn="scY-,_ fjintingtnn Rpach &b. Aw+wr's ►Waal W.110-170-01 +c, t .sue 7w. _ fgt+ feat la, „ �,Talbert Avenue t„+rj1. p•a(,nt�oldenwest Sts�, cbaanitYl_.. suta ri t- Att•- tf L WILW.2 Wool a. t.•y , PCH._504 b. j.rt• wl root` `� »rt Pali��jC OCean 11 01. _._.c+twfal Plan t%data U.....rtwldxttUlt unit• ACfs 01. .�K1 0s._._ 42. _-)hw Lltc.nt 02..__Ott Ica I Si. rt. 02. ,,.. bwjy ctm 07.---J= Al. -Grwral clan Ava%kwnt ACIN.,- bWIy'N.-_....-..r.,. 03. „X l,.q We fr.-.,_JQO 0/. . „Jjazte Flan a).2t+lplr4k aaafdAtt 01. 1%. 04. __trait=A 03. ---k aatim M90 ow"Ye" 9446, V 06. ,%aetttc Flan 01. t+d*trsall 34. R. as. - -A&Nq " ta.A Mice sot 00.1 W. -CMMA.xy Pion Arta Fn 01" 1 CA, -,-j%d1Nfi0Fwwt as.,_,)tttef rtclJltitrt 1Ctz 1Ctb 09. -..-Aftrwa Od.-Tten/Vv(tALiv t 2ypt Dcali 10. .•rJ++r6 tslv1►!an 07. ,._.Xtrlrgt IN1e,t114 1 (ALdlylolta. Pwml ftvt Tv-t "I ou.) Co. --.emcee Trot watts ll`O U. .X_tllf 1+0it 0. ._.,_Wwte=ttAMML, 411 u. .-...,lalnt taxumlt u._ aM * hpa Flan 10. tx:s A,Lrtesd Park, Passive/Recreation 31. +tenet ax+s�ft 3.7. ,.,_.Or+oei Jq lfwfvf u...._..om.rt .;._..,......_.. 33. _ Ottrr. _,...r,�____��.jj 14. --fAtor 10. 12. 13....,Dtpuc t3ytl "A 21. ..., /r,Rar Quality 04, - jAMtlnla'YL&wLl 01. noodtrww&lnayf 3A. ..,--ia"f 0"elty U. ...X-Mwt AWRY 02. ctwlaral t" 0t. 17. .-...tlocLl 21. ---Vr-t&vVA4armn 63. __:.Ut ow'41 y 30.-.-A Ra 1visIN Ww" is. ::jM t eta ISM M. Sxua ut 04. _X-M,* , a0ca,l/ttseeafsttal U.,..., jKlmrW 3!. ---^Ud wort. 27. ___gd tb uawAM 05._D wjw tar 32, - %LM 30..-..rM14/1Mormw i8. ..,.J+"u bl a Lod we N. .._Amvwe 33._..tuluc sate U. -.1,nW1,14karadotlon ". OALLstive tWietottt M. .....lstn 2"d 11. L 'U.X wq+atioa M. m+► 14. 1 " Land Use - Open Space, Recreation; Zoning - Community Facility Development. of a 15 acre open/pass•ive park, including grass, trees, picnic tables, sidewalksi and a Farkinn lot. June 290 1989 a. SWAM a sea MUM o.sst,�___.__,_„�... • Of 1j201 Q�1.a MWJGN of �olA�tpmifty * t d0 MM) i-XION, it loft.• a7 610ai 4l=ii,�Y1MU ten a tAj� (..f. ?�rNY T�:.a-tcr..:rN••....•....t....r.„w,.... .twit. IIEVIWlWt M AGBNCISS ' �- Resources Agency ,.- X I. caltrane District J12 Boating/Waterways Dept. of Transpartatiou 1 Unning Conservation Aeronautics Fish and Gams Chlifornia Highway Patrol Fomstry Housing & Ca=intty Dev't. Colorado River 0mrd Statewide Health Planntng Dept. Witter Resources - Health . Ruclantation Food & Agriculture r..� Parks and Recreation Public utilities llo=issioa ' Office of Historic Preservation public Works X Native American Heritage Camission Corrections S.P. Bay Cons. & Devi. Comi.saion General Servicze Coastal c mnission OE A `low Energy Oanmission Bat►ta Abnica, mountains State Unde Cmmissioa MA Air Rewumes Board OPR - CLOA Solid Rate Mana►gawnt Ord ._.._._ m - Coastal SVWB; ►kcratrectto - Bu,%u of Land t+lWwSemeat __X. Rwgm: pegLon 8, Santa Ana Porsst Service lister Rigbts ..X 4t2rerr: South Least Air ewe t•tyt Water Quality ..._.. tether: gen�r#c�,,,,, mom PM &Z Uft MY Date RACeived at SM a og-"Rumber Date Review Starts Applia"t - Vat* to Agencies Cot fultant Aata to Sm contact pbme Clearmo a Dr► 'e Addre 1�tatae: t %AO t .1 ._.l...� ..w..-.... ..+..�........r... ,..+.v. ..^w..... ♦•M.Y•IV.... Y�.t .. . ....vf..\.Y♦\• stf.-.t...._...:! fit...i..Ya...it.rr.r..�r..�.iw�1w ..N.�...._... .r.r.�.Ar.+ �I City of Huntington Beach 3j— Z000 MAIN STREET CA:.iFORNIA92648 �r DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 636.6241 Plannhe Dividon 536-6271 June 30, 1989 Office of the Govenor Office of planning and Research State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 + Attn: Garrett Ashley SUBJECT: NEGATWE DECLARATION NO. 89 22— 16 ACRE PARK DEVELOPMENT i Dear Mr, Ashley: The City of Huntington Beach has prepared a mitigated negative declaration in analyTing the potential impacts of the following Community Servicefi project: Project Proponent: City of Huntington Beach Community Services Department. Project Location: Huntington Central Park, west of Coldenwert at the western terminus of Talbert Avenue. Project Description: Development of a l6 sacre open/passive park n Huntington Central Park, including grass, trees, picnic tables, sidewalks and a parking lot. Due to the time lisnits mandated by state law, responses and comments must be forwarded to the City at the earliest possible date but not later than 30 days. Sincerely, Kelly Mal Assistant Planner KM:lab Attachments—Negative Dec:laratiun No. 89-22 1. Area Map 2. Project Description and Location 3. Initial Study 4. Mitigating Measures S. Attachments (3049d) f ..�.._...�_...._.....-......��.�.+—.�....-�..-......�..�. .,..... ,. ..a••.. . ..e+c.nr�a»�a a. _.�.4.;'+r•.. .u-ni n�••a.,.aravw.au�...... --- •--""-•.+•++w� NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. $9-22 I. Project Description Development of a 16 acre opett/passive park In Huntington Central Park, Including grass, trees, picnic tables, sidewalks and a parking lot. The area is surrounded by developed park and across Goldenwest Street from the terminus of Talbert Avenue. The site is currently a barren area with two trees. The Park, Tree and I we scrape Division cuts the wild grass and weeds down periodically as part c f its maintenance program. (Please see the conceptual site plan titled "Cert.-al Park 16 acre ouen/Passlre Development.") 1I. Project Location The project Is located in Huntington Ceniral Park within the City of Huntington Beach, The 16 acre area is adjacent to Goldenwest Street at the western terminus of Talbert Avenue. Please see the attached "Regional Location", "City", and "Huntington Central Park Master Plan" maps for the sites relative location. s f f i i LOS ANGELES COUNTY •_ ., _ �,_,__,•,;S SAN 6ERNARDINO COUNTY t � � a RIVERSIDE COUNTY C i \Anaheim + . Cardin Grow Fwy, Orange �• Tu Santa :tln n Ana G 4y oa San Natfo I M Costa Mesa '' Huntington 1 . Beach Newport Irvine • 0611ch �o Project Site •r� �; PACIFIC OCEAN Laguna • Beach San Juan ! Capistrano 11 �SAN DIEGO COUNTY San Clements, ' REGIONAL LOCATION 1 - .._.,�_.....-...�.,. _.... ....---�..�....-......-_..... .....�...._ ._.._._. .._.. ......�.. ........ �. •...,.....r.... ..i...... ...,..rw N�. ..r..».�. .�.r... r�-rr�+...ter z PROJECT SITE rtut.tr �� -- In r t • f CITY OF ���. HUNTINGTON BEACH `�• "` 1 ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORMA «.n�r.ra �....«..r�.r �.......,.«t.�w..r�s!T:.fl... r�,.t�...r.t ....r«r .. .+tea•. .w ....♦•. � ... .r..Y J•.I.I,♦..♦.. tM.:'�..♦.a....r..�...�..•_w..✓.. .� w.r.• J s y>,;._r✓sZar�n--�-�vrt+c........... — ......t.,_. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA J ` II 1 J fit ji PARKING LOT °�;. i`• ' C •0 ACRES i W/1 6� 3'4 { •A E� A 1.��":'; • PARKING SPACE A. JEX " ` _ AIE7 ,,- to AC1 •,�{ ��� jl � h i�• 1 A r ..� OPEN-SPACE ;ter' -.l�a-,G t •^�•� 20 4CRES 1A PCAY ARHA tI �� � !;. ., .•. w_i�. '10 ACRES l OT I llurrl.aralvKc 1 { `,'•'f� l;'� I . :'' Mj ACFICS S • t •iT• S�� j���/r� :C s1" •L` ! 'p l' W/100 PARKING •� •� r /r'!.,. _I� .,�_ SPACES ••�':}�. • Nl r yW vuutw Ot11:ST71 Ait� L ' SNING LA 1 �•• ` •' �� '�+ ji.5 ACR Z�. .. � r��' � III 1•' t �i;,r•A.� �lot a•.j ACC% :�'r •.� ,. •r�;;16•:. , 1 ,q �LN EA �w '.•': _t�>s:t:'. p"! :; 1 I �1 R) AVEMM +1 PARKING L.ST ME ACRES 2 W/ 170 PARKING SPACES ext CENTRALPARK MASTERPLAN CITY br HUNTINGTON BEACH u*vfr or ki .000 I I•I f/� fr V^�V �. ...,..,.., fl .'LrM/r'• q�''la laid' 1p mrcr r - I CARozn 1.1"'NICTON1 . CENTRAL. PARK •1-6 ACRE OPEN/PASSIVE DEVELOPMENT CbMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT. CITY CIF ,HUNTINGTCN BEACH, CALIF. ���•� oa� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST F011f:f (To Be Completed By Lead Agency) i. Background 1. Name of Proponent �if�'.nf�iJuntinti1�11_lieslt li._rt�li�LTtt�►1LtY_SSC1�C� 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent (� 3. Date of Checklist Submlltcd j.un!._2Q.1`?C.Q Agency Requiring Checklist 111x.�f_I)+.�rlt�st�rL�.�1�h_ S. PJame of Proposal, if applicable . R�1L12Ln�'►1t�Lf S. C:�[P.�[1[ ►� :�? + il. Environmental Impacts i (Explanations of all "ycs" and "maybe" arrsvers are required on attached sheets.) s 1. Earth. Will the prnposal resrltt in: i a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic: substructures? b, Disruptions, displacements, compaction oi• overcovering of the soil? fr,. Chnnge in torogrsphy or ground surface 1 relief features? { d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? { e. Any increase In wind or water erosion of solis, el the r on or off the site? _ f. Charges in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may mcxilfy the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or airy bay, Inlet or lake? I 1 G. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ,round failure, or similar hazards? X ?. Air. Will the proposal result In: a. Substrntial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change In climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, In either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rats: and araount of surface runoff? _ :. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ...X._ 4 e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen er iurbluity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate o' flow of ground waters." g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an i aquifer by cuts or excavations? " h. Substantial reduction in the amount of ( water otherwise available for public water ! supplies? L Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal Waves Environmental Checklist --2- (3075d-2) . r. X03 maybe -Na. a. Plant Life. Will the proposal result In: a. Change in tye diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plant,)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c, introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in n barrier to the normal replenishment of extrting specles? d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in; a. Change In the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or Insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any u,7' sue, rare or endangered species of r.nitnals? .. c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result M a barrier to the mig-ation or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ 6. Nol3e. Will the proTvsal result In: a. Increases In existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _ 7. Light and Glare Will the proposal produce now light or glares 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result In it substantly.l alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. 91 the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? I Environmental Checklist -3- 30;Sd-3 Yss Maybe b. Substantial depletion of uny nonrenewable natural resew*ce? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of haxnrdous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or rndiatlon) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ b. Possible Interference with an emergency response play. or an emergency evacuation plan? 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or creato n demand for additional hewing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result In: a. Generation of substantial additional l vehicular movement? I b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor- tation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ....�_ y f. Increase in traffic, harards to motor i vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an III effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the fallowing areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? 1� ? Environmental Checklist -4- (3075d-4) YO may -HQ- c. Schools? - -- d. Parks or other recreational fact'itles? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result In: a. Use of substantial amount: of fiiel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon exist- ing source of energy, or require the development of sources of energy? _ .��. - 1(�. Utilities. NVlll the proposal result In a need for ce-w systens, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communication systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tnttks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and dispesai? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: Ek. Creation of any health hazard or potential E health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or viev.- open to the: public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ._.Y_. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an Impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? _ x* Environmental Checklist -5-• (3075d-5) l 1 Yka hinxbs 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? 1). Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or hLtorlc building, structure, or obiect? .X�. c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique, ethnic cultural values? d, Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential Impact area? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild- life population to drop below self sustain- ing levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important exnmpler of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Duet; the project have the potential to achieve short--term, to the disadvantage or long-term, environmental goals? (A short-- term Impnct on the environment Is one which occurs in a relatively brief, defini- tive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have Impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those Impacts on the environment is significant.) c1. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects 4 on human beings, either directly or indirectly? C_, Environmental Checklist -6- (3075d-6) Ill. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation 9AR.T11 lb. Approximately 25,000 cubic yards are estimated to be graded over a 16 acre site. A grading plan will be required, along with a compaction -report. The area will primarily be developed into passive recreation space made and covered with landscaping. No significant adverse impacts to the soil area anticipated . AIR 2a. Temporary impacts to air quality will result from project grading activities. Air pollutants will be emitted by grading equipment and dust will be. generated daring grading and site preparation. Given the limited size of the park area, the air pollutants emitted by grading equipment are not expected to be significant. A diesel powered scraper is the most common equipment used for grading operations. Emissions rates for a grading scraper are as follows: r9llWr_c EMUSipil- aw (in grams per hour) Carbon monoxide 660 Nitrogen oxides 7.020 Hydrocarbons 284 Sulphur oxides 210 Particulates 184 Source;: AQMD handbook, April 1997 For this type of project, two pieces of heavy equipment are normally expected to operate at one time. based on this assumption, if both pieces of equipment ol-mated for eight hours per day, the following emissions would result; 23 pounds per day of carbor, monoxide, 99 pounds per day of nitrogen oxides, 10 pounds per day of hydrocarbons, 7.4 pounds per day of sulphur oxides, and approximately 6.5 pounds per day of particulates. These emissions are considered very minor. With 1 mitigation measures, no significant impacts are anticipated. RAM 3b. Absorption rates may increase slightly as a result of the additional plant life. The increased ruttoff from the proposed parking lot should counter balance the additional nb�,;••rbtlon in landscaped areas. Environmental Checklist (3075d) i No significant impacts are anticipated. g, It. The landscaping on the site will create: additional demands on the City's water supply. The existing developed park that surrounds this parcel get its water 1 from two wells within Huntington Central Park. Jim Jones, Park Mainte:natice Supervisor, tilt indicated that these two wells could supply the necessary water for this new development. The Green Acres + Project, making available tertiary treated sewerage for irrigation of landscaped areas may increase available water for the park. The Irrigation system installed in the park shall be capable of linking tip with the Green Acres System. With mitigation, no significant impacts are anticipated. PbA.rLUIFl= 4a,b. The site is currently barren with the excepticn of two mature trees. y The Parks, Trees and Landscape Division cuts the wild grass lied weeds, 1 primarily non-nature ruderl species, down p^riodically as part of Its maintenance program. The vegetation is greatly disturbed, with no y endangered plant specie.. at the site, No significant impacts are anticipated. C. The site is currently Covered with not:-native grass and weed species. The landscaping proposed for the site would be made up of species typically found in our Central Park area. As the landscaping for a } majority of the proposed project area will be consistent with existing i landscaping, no new specks will Le introduced. 1� With mitigation, no significant impacts are anticipated. Sa,b. Please tree discussion under EU 11_UEE, 4a,b. The proposed project area is extremely disturbed with a limited ruderat biotic community. No reduction in diversity or number of species of animals, including endangered species, is anticipated to take place. The use of native species should be encouraged at the site to provide benefits to native animal and plant species in the area. Using existing Central Park landscaping as a guide, no new non-native species should be, Introduced in this area. With mitigation, ne significant impacts are anticipated. t Environmental Checklist -8- (3071d) NATURALAF. MES 9. Please see discussion or WE1JU 3g and h. No significant impacts are anticipated. MEC=EC_UATlQN 13a. The traffic genera lion number for a passive recreation area in a neighborhood park is approximately 6 tripends per acre . Given the 16 acres to be developed, the number of trips generated per day should be Approximately 96. This is not coiisidered a significant number of trips and should not significantly impact the local circulation system. A parking lot is planned to be provided with the new development. At minimum, 96 spaces should be provided in the proposed lot. With mitigation, signi,"icant imparts are anticipated, b. Talbert Avenue terminates on the opposite side of Goldenwest Street from the part-. The entrance of the park should be located exactly opposite Talbert Avenue to promote .afe and efficient circulation. Should Talbert be realigned in the future, the entrance of the part: shall be relocates: to be in tine with the terminus of Talbert Avenue. With tnitigntion, no significant impacts are anticipated. PU i.1Q.5F.B=S 14d. According to Jim Engle, Park Development Superintandent, the proposed park will be maintained by the staff for the adjacent park area. The: State of California, Department of Parks and recreation will { be funding development of the. parks. No significant impnets are nnticipated. I MLIL S 1 Ec, please see discussion of Yy1TER, 3 g and h. � No significant Impacts are anticipated with mitigation. RECUMOWN 19, The proposed project will provide an additional 16 acres of passive recreation for the City. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. i 1. Conversat!on with City Traffic Engineering Division, Jamal Rlhimi, 6/26/89 Environmental Checklist -9- (3075d-9) �. CLILTURAj, RESOURCES 20a,b. The project area formerly contained a large archaeological deposit, CA-Ora-142. The site: was recorded by 1-Iafner and McKinney in October of 1969 and was described as a large shell midden of great age. CA-Ora-I42 was completely destroyed in 1963 and 1964 by the Calirornia Department of Transportation. The material from the site was used in the construction of freeway off ramps. No excavation work was ever accomplished at the site. As the archaeological information available at the site has been completely destroyed, the grading required for park development can not do any additional harmto a cultural resource. Should any archaeological material be discovered during grading, grading should cease, the City Planning Department contacted, and an archaeologist consulted to determine the appropriate course of action. No significant impacts are anticipated. 1V. Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation; I Find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the .,aviransnent, and a NEGATIVE- DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case ..�, because the mitigation mrasures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. 1 find the proposed project IviAY have a significant effect on the environ- ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Signatur C For Environmental Checklist _2 { f►- (3075d 1t)) CITY OF i1tMING10N 8FAC11 MITIGATING MEASURES NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 69-ZZ ,_. 1, All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to ha-idle then. 2. If lighting is included in the parking lot and/or rocreation area energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g.. high pressure sodium vapor, metal halida). All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spill&ga"onto adjacent properties. 3. Existing mature trees on site thall be retained and incorporated into tits site plan if feasible, Any existing mature tree that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio wita 36" box trees which shall be incorporated into the pi-oJect's landscape plan, _ 4. Prior to the issuance of a grading per-nit, a grading plan shall be sutmitted to the City's Department of Public Works. A plan for tilt control fnr all water runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the project may be required by the Director of Public Works if deemed necessary. ,�._. 5. Should any abandoned oil wells or tanks be encountered, the Fira Dap,Artment $hall be notified and current standards met as required by Article 15 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Any abatidonmart of existing wells must be to current standards as well. . X._. 6. Should any cultural materials be encounterod during the initial site :survey or during grading and excavation activities, all activity shall cease, the City Planning Department notified and an archaeologist consulted to determine tho appropriate course of action. 7. During cleaning, grading, earth movir,g or excavation, the applicant shall: a. Control fugitive dust by regular watering, paving coltstruction roads, or other dust preventive measures. b. Maintain equipment engines in proper tune. 8, Construction shall be 11mIted to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Ccnstruction shall be prohibited Sundays and federal holidays. 9. Pant species utilised in park dsvelopmont shell be consistent with the existing park. ko new non-native► spocies shall be utilized in this development. Native species plants shall be used wherstvar feasible!. 10. A minimum of % parking spaces shall be provided in the proposed perking lot. II, The proposed park entrance shall be in line with the to nninus of Talbert Avenue. Should Talbert Avenue be realigned in the future, the park entrance shall be relocated .;cordingly. 12. The irriation system installed in the park shall be capable of linking up with the Green Acres System, (3015d) • r� Pu Ish date: July S, 1999 JECAL ADYEMLMEMEdl' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SECTION CITY OF IIUNTINGTON BEACH Notice is hereby given by the Department of Community Development, Environmental Resources Section of the City of Huntington Reach that the following draft negative declaration request has been prepared and will be submitted to tine ri+y Council for their consideration In August, 1989. The draft negative .leclaration will be bailable for public review and comment for thirty (30) days commencing July S. 1989. Draft Negative Declaration No. 89-22 is a request to develop a 16 acre open!passive park to include grass, trees, picnic tables, sidewalks and a parking Int. Tile site Is located west of Goldenwest Strict, at the terminus of 'Talbert Avenue (between Ellis and Slater Avenues) in the City of Huntington Beach. The area Is zoned Community Facility- Recreation (CF-R)and the general plan designation for the site Is Open Space - Recreation. The proposed project is consistent with both the land use and zoning for the project area. A copy of the request Is on file with the City Clerk, City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. Any person wishing to comment on the request may do so In writing within 30 days of this notice by provldin; written comments to the Department of Community Development, Enviraniner_tol Resources Section, F.Q. Box 190, Huntington Leach, CA 92648. i i i ' Ii I 1 1 .. (3101d) i 1 r. BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO AGE AND CONDI.TION OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS r 1 ' \y,_. .-'-�:lAi(� -:AYIFA[:'.�_1_..`-w•.'..1•�•.�l�r -'"_;�!_. -1;fit]I'£tTT7 LCi_ C]; ""•r}' / � � I .-. :�'.�.�t Y. -+"{ \ - � I. w ►' ' IN ILQ EWS8 j t l Q �7y� ,, nKINct slot Ml ;` �01'!fj 'A V.... - �' !.:. Y PAnKINO SPACE 1 AO CIiM } ►� } f- - t r/ 0, a i, _ �(+L�1" `!• t y OPEN SPACE :s•�3 ,(�� -.I!',;U ., IML;HIC•ARLA �ti i_f !1 20 ACM S 1'CAY AREA I `!-4 �'� .�'•. �{: ;,I _ PAIilria for1.5 ACHES — I °��T•`IJ `�'.., _ l`►".. " " � ��`•, .... W/IOU F'AiiKINQ SPAcr- 1.5 Ace �t 4 93.ACRE �t'�/� "_-!^-1 h}.AVARCA `� �• j ; �qEl / r• ••�1•i•T.�TZ l •G ,.. - t ' `r ��il LLAX3 Am VAX iSMIKING LOT 2.5 AMS S W/ 1T0 PARKING SPAM I I I CENTRAL P .R. K MASTERPLAN CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 5973 _ CID CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN SYREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK July 14, 19119 i { Gear Mra , Gulich: ` have forwarded your July 12, 1989 letter regarding the Centrul Park Master Plan to the mayor and City Councilmembers j and to Max VOWmdn, Director of the Community Service, j Department, i f Sincerely yours, I t Connio Brockway, CMC __ E City Clerk CD:cne Euclamm! CC_: i-lax Bowman, Virectou of Community Services Department i i i i 1 1 ! fi 1 f tefophcne:714{,36-U2171 I f Mar-guerite Galich { 939 - 10th Street ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 714/960-3978 { I July 12, 1989 � 1 Members of the Huntington Beach City Council Z c/o Connie Brockway, City Clark x 1000 Main Slre2t Huntington Beach, Cis 92648 Dear Honorable Members: a SubJect: Central Park Master Plan Enclosed please find an additional ninety-nine signatures of citizens who support the idea of the inclusion of tennis courts in the Central Park Expansion Plan. Hopefully, you will recall that thirty-four signatures krere sent to you in April and an additional eighty-three were presented to you at the City Council Meeting of Monday, May 15. The total number of signatures submitted to you in this inforival petition now totals 2161 Please be advised that these signatures are not "supermarket signatures" but were gathered for the most part at the tennis courts of Huntington Beach and express the wishes of actual players and/or { their families and friends. I We would like to be advised %Then this itein is scheduled for your 1 consideration. We will continue to seek supporters of this idea and would like to be present when the item is agendized. i ' In closing, we urge you to approve the inclusion of a tennis center in the Central Park Expansion Plan. Thank ynu. Sincerely, Mcrguerite Galich { Resident Tennis Advocate I 1 CC: City AdministvaLor f I _-- ——— - - __ __7 I%Q cL LJA e / i fTb IL � g t 7e )(47 R i 4 k try _77-. 7 A(C;_4-7- A w• . s. ebo-RA o Ff ��? 4'�t�7�• �'f'j'►�"�"� !ry1 l�!(r. �, ,K��'30y�� r!!/�U��• '•,drZ:C/ ..! f 44 eglt 3 Lrr7q a - '- -, --ate _ _/ - ~ � � �, •�'i►�. ._zTic.Y.- -.-..........-.y-. _.- �`/._._ _._ .... .._-- -_-_- G � ,+ �"�-'G.�S _C� ••+--sf.�f" - 1 - S' '3 fi• 1, �fL E , 11 y 'E�Ts �aSS , 1GZIu.'fCST -wig Iiurj: ZaS�of �— I4 s oll loll_ "� ''F-:����.��!�QG•'�.r—_...�______�`�'�,/.__��L__1�°sue:..�=��.s._'ii1r,�'.;ac'.a'`�+t�c•'�1t ��.__ ���_i��ss�_--_---.L-•.. 000- 407 -4 .04 )P--Vt IL �j•� !_1 !p p�lE° W 11-t io, / 7 �; ! 7r(+ ! G 7�(�1 � !-�'�r-, �''-�`''?' f��•`C'.' �_L-��-L�' .. 040 — J 2 ch 0 io jrJ< '"oC , .aw L L, 14YRTr f'4?_ L.YAf,A f 5 77 N l p9r-H_,. 6`/ _- yV F I �1+ Lf• ,,�C?s#�2 .�w?�/i r�•��f�v' ;�'`/'� rf%�7.+1.�i�1 d' �Ll'f1' , 9. cx )Onna a WN k-znt 166, �}��� xac g2647fj to Z-1A 21 IN4--OF Jw M �• M .w i Jrh F'Ck s ar wo �> fJ_ �+ j .ter t / � .� r a, �� 4�•%�i .a �f�w.____ rj��L!t' .t f',L ,�;•;r.L,;.<_w � �?� I ' r` 4`„- / -___ __�_ _ _._.. = :' ' I!" 4,-/-4- .frv" KA ;4l f /1'/`' t.l,'/ 'r:%... i" r ,,r�rc' '` = f �`� - l .� C _/.%�l �ti-%�'�_. e.•- c > C. 4, �y l �� -...' / � ��l 1r/ � ��.ar^' � fr}�./'r � �✓Ct i_l :f �}' ���_, t"� 1��'�j- .'l -r � '.i s t�C^"_ 1��4^i f�..-'11.+'�_"-"".�.�_�� _ 'wt.�.._—_ �..-..._ •t A lem �..�:..�.....,;,c;5�/�} .� ��J�':%?� �`_ � :`!'-f.�.'/"�i�.w�f� _,+'�..,,,�''fr`i-.'�' _ _.�._1I•_�t.J..____� ..._____._ _ -- _ _ _-,�i�� tr.�-� t� .�--'�� ' __ _ F STE'Ovv'3 44 - i Pile 576 0CF'iq..!Moi—c'- � � ��'� � ___ ..,_. - w�— �+rif+Tr.r'L/ • �-.�+�` E l� �� 't _ a, O T , cl f { , ! u Sri'-?- 3G 3! �., �, f ''{��F?l���G.'�• ��,;,[c7 i.t�tar. r.•nr-� L�F► 7 ` ct83 � /� r•� f ,.� i '1 -�-!Y._ __ ,/f� .�C� ,•mac. ����j�t!�,�/�' �-r'�'? ��"{ �%" � '��'� yt� ��'-� ���. '��'^�,,, ti�! �- f,,.� /j �,�"5 ! y"if� �fy_/.r`lGf�'/•"'+ .�,r''----!'- '--.•"',�� ,ram' /"tit AAJ u ' ,,,�,� C.t,�A0 r_ LLx y � � j/�� �j�ri t,/ �1�'.q�.'(} (��Trj' ffjj��,,�`JJrr�' ._. .• .LTMU� Vim' I�iJ Jr+V . _�- --__ f.- ;!_ ...__.. r. .-.- I "- .�_ . _ .__- llY�asy`��l Y1�•�w.. s 3�ii► c3 M J� •'� .L - - - •--__w..-_._w__�._� - i 1. • € � PETITION T4 RE,'JES1 �lm LM, or inir,itr�'Tt� CONSIDER BUILOM TEIV IS CWS FOR PUBLIC USE Pane 5 pt - CENTRAL PARR Jt;..- 11, 1989 s !fie (Print) Address Phone Humber Signature - 7T. - •1. eA . Q� ,:1�:�--�. L : 69 'T {p�� 4- 3ep iw;iv S, _js -f Iovn eo aC�e Al_ J (� /r1 d'-V6 M i" f 1 Y • ( = PETITION TO REQUEST THE CITE' OF tgJtlTlli6TONfa Page 6 c - CONSIDER BUILDING TENNIS COMIS FDk PUBLIC USE X July 11, 989 CENTRAL rARl: Name Print Address Phone Nimber Signature AJ LA) � y 1. ��i5 �H�CF}, /d.��; _.___ '�-vR. ..�_l?t._ - _ ��.--1,1!4!G w _____ ���-�o�° _-------_- —_��1�'- __ ���-1�`-- • ,. ��fv '�/�,n� �4 h"�f? 1Z►� �1�� -i•� Ili�.� y6 "� �-(�' _� �✓ril -- -- ) p t•' 1 77777777 Y _ t t• r,� e � � '"TITION 7U REQM9 T9 CITY OF f I t To Page l 7 JulyllAg 89IDER BUILDING TENNIS CCMTS FOlt PUBIC . AT Name (Print) Addrass NSRAE PARK • Phone Number Signature e / - 70c gJay 7 Cr- tt- r� � f'��4 , I w j � ' r, .�r.-��,)!�. s% r J ! '� r'•�_� ,� %� i .1� � � J'.- � J _ y i �7 L 1' }- C� 'Jk'- � .x s � - �. - - .ram-�. -_ --r....._-�.._ __�--_�._ -____-���_.--�.—.. .`-.-�-._ ...�._-..._....... _.....-._—_, —. __...___•_-".__-._�_..._-_._..._ _.._,..._.__.-._.__._...�_.___.. __._--_ _. ,1� y ` a y r _ _s h R w ' ' aT F �`Y 41.�NC� ACTION �" ' i9� C1 go a2rAIL, ,ft6L —r A�-,�, r7 rn�e4 " .t t� ........"—. SubmitUd tent lionorable Mayor and City Council Members r SUbmitt*d by: Paul C. Cook, City Administrator� Prepared by: Robert J. Franz, Dc-put), taty Ad irristrat�r� Gail Mutton, City Attorney Subject: C!"^ Appropriation of Funds - Central Park Land Acquisition � r CSS r Coto aamt w10 Council Policy? )X) Yea ( J New Polk+r or Exception Sutwwt of We, Recommanditlon,Arwlysis, Funding Sources,Alternative Actlora, Attachments: Objective; To appropriate additional funds to cover the estimated cost of land acquisition for t e us room Form prop^_rty In Central Park. Recommendation Action: A1j1,,.•ovc the appropriation of $782,000 from the unappropriated teneFa-1 F and dirt arc for Central Dark land acquisition, Account #790765 and authorize the transfer of thes!! funds to the Park Acgt:i%ltlon and Development Fund. Ai►a� (ysiss Acquisition of the Pha!;e III portion of the. Mushroom Farm by the eminent domain process was authorized by the Council adoptlon of Resolution i13911 of August 1, 191'8. The amount required to be deposit-d in court as a part of the eminent d<stnain process is $2,393,000. Attached Is an analysis showing the prior budget appropriations for this acquisition. A3 Indicated In the analysis, an additional $792,000 Is needed, Furdinig Source: Unsppropriavtd Uenerti Fund balance (utilizing rt portion of the PCTA "buy out" funds). Attachments: Funding Analysis, Fiscal Lrtact= 5tat:atnent �r 4472j MUM AS, G (Confirming City Couwlii Ioaed session ixldgtt appropriation,.Qf $595,fN}0, and providing Amendment for reimburs nt of park acquisitiort futrds) rn MUSHROOM FARM PROPERTY ACQUISITION PHASE III Funding Analysis Appropriated in 1987188 Budget $ 1►800,000 (Central bark Land Acquisition— Account 790765) Less Expenditures through 3/31/89* _...17h.891� Available Funding as of 3/31/89 In Park Fund Balance $ 1,623,104 Council Authorized Deposit Into Court for third $ 2,395,000 Phase of Mushroon Farm 4/3/89 i Less Net Available Additional Appropriation Needed $ 771,896 Ettlmated Litigation Cost (Expert Witness, Trial Prefu►ration and Trial; Based on$200/Hour) Total Needed Appropriation $�, 'I81,896 i i * Priar Expenditures; Unbud:eted Settlement of Other Park Acquisitions $ 160,000 Litigation/Appraisal Expenses — Mushroom Farm _Jcm Total $ 376,996 4470J r iS iW YN'Y MIrI^xH,�., , Oyu . ' ii Vie i t AA �nfe cps" CW HUNTINGTON BWJWH ' INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION � dolfik NAM To PAUL E. COOK From ROBERT J. FRANZ City Administrator Deputy City Administrator Subject REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION Date MAY S, I989 TO COVER ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR MUSI11100hi FARM ACQUISITION FIS 89-14 As requested under the authority of Resolution 4831, a fiscal Impact statement has been prepared and submitted relative to the proposed additional funding necessary to complete final acquisition of the Phase III portion of the Mushroom Farm. Anticipations are that an appropriation of $782,000 would be adequate for this purpose. An affirmative response by the City Council would reduce the balance of the Clty'-v unreserved, undeslgnated Genei al Fund to $1,438,846. r 0 E4.' ANZ pyCDeut strator R3Pcsd f1 i i i 4"3 j • CITY OF HVNT1140TON sWACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION N<w�wcwN Mx►+ To PA(JL I:. COOK From R OBERT J. PRtANZ City Administrator Deputy City Administrator Sutgect PF_QunST FQf2 APPROPRIATION Date MAY 5, 1989 TO COVER ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR MUSHROOM FARM ACQUISITION F15 39-14 I As requested under the authority of Resolution 4832, a fiscal impact staternent has been prepared and submitted relative, to the proposed additional funding necessary to complete final acquisition of the Phase Ill pnrtion of the Mushroom Farm. Anticipations are that an appropriation of $782,UGO would be adequate for this psirpose. An affirmative response by the City Council would reduce thz balance of the City's unreserved, undesignated General Fund tn $i,232,446WAdi ROBE Deputr Fi;i~tsd d i { f 45031 REQUEoT FOR CITY COUNCIL ACT . . N �- - May 1 . 1 y8�} Submitted to: honorable Mayor and City Counci 1 Date Submitted by: Paul E. Cook , City Administrator .t-- AFPROYRD5 ITY COUNCIL Pr"aredby: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Se —, � 19 4�_ Subject: PROPOSITION 70 R011ERTI VDERG HARRIS GR .._....._• CtTY r:.x(ft 4 0t i' i x tic r Consistent.with Course Policy? � Y_. f 1 Nary Policy or F cep n S+tatoment of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Fundinq Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATMENT OF ISSUE There is a need to make appl.cat•ion for funding for the Roberti Vberg Harris Grant Program under Proposition 70 California Wildlife, Coastal and Parkland Conservation Art of 1988. UCI M MI)AT ION Approve the resolution ani direct st;sff to apply for $58,249 in funding under the Proposition 70 Roberti Z'berg Harris Grant Program with the money designated for use in the deveiopme.7t of Huntington Central Pork. ANAUSIS The California Park and Recreation DeparUuent has indicated that the city can receive $68,249 in funding fron the Proposition 10 Roberti t'berg Harris Grant Program. A match of $29,249 must be provided to qualify for this funding. Staff anticipates using the Park Acquisition and Development Fund as the funding source for the required match, The resolution along with a completed applicaticn form must be submitted to the state. As delineated to Council an January 3, 1989 when it approved the Prnposi Lion 7G Per Capita Gr►ant, staff is proposing to use this funding to develop the sixteen acres west of Golden Nest Street at Talbert Avenue. This area is surrounded on three silos by developed parkland and rrt the fourth side by Golden :lest Street. Development mould include open/passive area with trees, grass, walkways and picnic facilities in keeping with the 19B6 and 1988 surwty results. Parking and expanded rest rooms would also hive to be included since the existing facilities are already impacted to the point of not being able co har.1le the current service levels on busy days. 1 The City's landscape architectural firm has provided a preliminary cost estiry to of $1 .6 million for developing the sixteen acres. There will al spa be f an additional cost of $10,00t) for curbs, gutters and a sidew lk along Golden l West Street added to thi, project estimate to provide a "Finished edge" along the street. With a lA percent contingency included, the entire project will cost $1 ,940,000. fused on the dates the grant nK)nies would become available, the project could be developed in FY 90/91 . j 01 No sine t ••fix,'.Vt:X III i AEfUEST FOR CITY COUro*'� ACTION eOR) MAY 1 1989 PROPOSITION 70 ROBER) . Z'BERG HARRIS GRANT PROGRAM PAGE NO Staff anticipates using this grant, along with the SS66,000 from the Proposition 70 Per Capita Grant Program, $496,000 from the 1986 Bond Act and the city's Park Acquisition and Development Fund monies to develop the site. An application will also be submitted for the Proposition 70 Competitive Grant Program by October 1, 1989. The State Department of Parks and Recreation has indicated that these grant programs can be used together for a single project. FUNDING SOURCE Grants and Park Acquisition and Development Fund ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Do not apply for the Proposition 10 Roberti Z'berg Harris Grant Program funds. 2. Apply for the funding, but designate a different park development project. ATTACHNUIT Resolution Location Map MB:mb 07069/33-34 r,. n. t i J9'y7f:l �7�.ul�L�Q�i.�►��'�frNR i BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC REPR. ODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO AGE AND CONDITION OF ORIGINAL, DOCTJIVENTS OFo if r►. Rol�M`�:t�w. ". "•.''�"'o�ll.�'1+�'�4��1F?y'F�T�*';'F�M/.!�jfy'Ai�ti���l�r."•71t.��J�!Rr�.�l�i � f,,7 - fy _ t PFOP05Ei) DEVELOPMENT AREA IL, ' II ! 1 ,'! 11 1.NIJIT umr � `` •1 '1.:�, •~ 1.0 ACM!w/ WALE Q n ;1. • ' s 70 AREEA z ` ''t �NrTMuro+llrst � I 1 {) ; " �::i i• ,,. .. • 1,4 ACRES 3 1 l �,J � ' � _ is 1' 'i�:',• W/100 PARKWs .�. IWACIR am f ., go LA ACRE Y~AREA -J • ' , ;I>>P u� •. PARKING VOT 2.5 ACRES S W! 1#0 PARKING SPACES .1 MASTEOw"'LLAN cum, �i SALP.A.RK CiT'Y OF HUNT'IHCTON BEACH 597'3 rPoll REQUES f FOR CITY COIJNCL ACTION DIU (larch 6, 1989 y Submttts►d to: Honorable (layor and City Council Submitted by. Paul E. Cook, City Administrator Nr Prop,rnndl by: a dQ ltel vin 11, Bowman, Director, Community Service �,�►° � 8ubjoct: HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK GOLF FACILITY AMPROT30 By CITY lr Conskunt with Council Policy? I l Ya I I New Policy or Ex ion r 8►..:twmmt of Issw.Recommendstion,Analysis, Fundirtll Souza,AlternatIA AMIans, SUMMIT OF ISSUE I• There is a need to receive direction frov City Council as to whether it desires to develop a portion of the undeveloped land in Huntington Central Park as a golf facility. RECO WNDATION Approve solicitation of proposals for the development of a golf facility on ' thirty to forty acres of undeveloped land in Huntington Central Park. ANALYSIS Staff is requesting direction from City Council to determine if a golf facility should be constructed on an undeveloped section of Huntington Central Park. On the west side of the park, there are approximately sixty acres available south of Huntington Lake and the F.questrian Center, between Golden (lest and Edwards Streets. This includes the former A.C. Clarion property and the undeveloped parkland currently used for equestrian trails. East of Golden West and south of Talbert, there are forty-five to fifty acres available north of the proposed mobile home relocation park and existing gun rat►ge. This acreage does not inciude the mushrowe farm ( twenty-five acres). There are also plans to construct a three par qol f course as part of Ocean View Mobile Home Estates. There are positive and negative aspects to developing a golf facility in the park. Considerations in fervor of a facility include: there is only one public course in Huntington Beach Meadowlark Golf Course); a large, manicured, green turf area would be aesthetically pleasing and enhance the overall view of the Park; it is staff's intention that the city would not ;have to pay for the development or artintenance of that portion of the park; and; a facility would be revenue-generating. The negative aspects to be evaluated are: a single recre,ation4l use would. monopolize a large portion of the park; if problems such a!; errant golf balls could not be mitigated in the desi ore Irocess, the city would receive public complaints; if the course is on the �q Md ola .9��p1ws.wa>.+r.t,�ap:atKli�.tn:s��hiila;r�, .. :r ..a,r �... :,•.C.t :ii.. .�..S.:�S:ti,Y�Jt*�sK1+s�w�.cc.a+rat�++Ma....aav�.�...�r.+«w� {S)— 1 REQUEST FOR CITY COUMCP" ICTION r001 14ARCH 6, 1989 HUNTINGTON CENTRAL. PARK GOLF FACILITY PAGE TWO west side of the park, a portion of the park currently used for equestrian trails would have to be utilized; the city only owns 193 of the 300 encyclopedia lots on the west side of tna park (estimated purchase price for the 107 lots is over $1 .6 million); part of the area on the east side of the park has county limitations requiring the city tc pay a The of any revenue to the county; and if the course is lighted, there could be a negative impact on any surrounding residential areas. On flay 13, 1987, the Community Services Com fission reviewed the possibility of a golf course in Huntington Central Park. At the time, the commission voted against having a concessionaire build and operate a golf course in the park even with the stipulation that the developed property revert to the city at the end of the lease period. Potential concessionaires have approac',ied the city with golf proposals. These ' proposals range from simply a golf driving range to an executive-size, eighteen hale golf course with clubhouse and restaurant. If City Council approves putting a golf facility in the park, staff will prepare a Request for Proposal and submit it to Council for review. MWING SOURCE N/A ALTERN11T1YE ACTIONS Do not oursue development of a golf facility in Huntington Central Park. ATTACHMENT Huntington Central Park 11ap 12:101 0706E/40-41 �6�.ru...�....�+.nw-.w r,�ti;.1P•1YA`rN iY h�ri Y:lT�.Ti n'r i..��r r. ..,.r.........•.w...T«:,.�:,t•.:••:,r; o,r i ,r4cx+_Y'1::J..irt.r yµ.1M du sreyrr�..rwt+vi..w�yyta,���� .i r .. i •� tpl ) ATI � •Jr • 'ram f�(' f. LOT s ��•• ••_� . r,�ICNrKt� fill OP WAR;illI III Loa wo -sell kwa • `1 ` � �� �Ms►ww MAIlKNKi L�T � •- L5 ACKI i w i m r PARKING$FACE$ APPIMIPATELY 60 ACRES / APP ugATELY 45 To S0 Acws �L MASTEWLAN C" OF HUNTMTON BEACH f.21'y,i,,•W 5'� ..;*r Fl.�'r.��r i�•�fF".'iri.w.. i � ..ice,,..., ..__..vt., ..�.._ .r....c... . ,. i ♦.. '.�: _. :�i•.. ..U..,,...., .,...,'�^✓Lu1:nwYrvM•hi..1Mp�1111�1 ,, r. � 4 � / ;^ fir' •�'� T � •••� C-O K���! � � � •« • � �� � r.ur MIIr11W •� �/ " . —•�—� wad w w sMM' OCEAN VM EST " • _ ^�M� e .CITY OF HUNTINCTON BEACH REQUEb ( FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION January 3, 1989 Coati Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council is 09 UNWtw by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator Pri�pwrNd by: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Servi CITY .rx Subim: PROPOSITION TO PER CAPITA GRANT PRO WA APS' corwisgnt with coufwm Policy? C I Yes I 1 New Pdlky or Exception 8tatwyftt of law, Rocommodation,Amlysls,Funding Saurci,AlternWy*Actions,Attachments: STATEIENT OF ISSUE There is a need to make application for funding for the Per Capita Grant Program under Proposition 70 California Wildlife, Coastal and Parkland Conservation Act of 1988. AECMNDATION Approve the, resolution and direct staff to apply for $S66,000 in funding under the Proposition 70 Per Capita Grant Program with the money designated for use in the development of Huntington Central Park, h!IALYSIS The California Park and Recreation Department has indicated that the city can receive $566,000 in funding from the Proposition 70 Per Capita Grant Program, The resolution along with a completed application form must be submitted to the !state by January 13, 1989. Staff is proposing to develop the sixteen acres west of Golden west Street at Talbert Avenue, This area is surrounded on three sides by developed parkland and on the fourth side by Golden west Street, Development would include open/passive area with trees, grass, walkways and picnic facilities in keeping with the 1986 and 1988 survey results. Parking and expanded rest rooms would also have to be included since the existing facilities are already impacted to the point of not being able to handle the current service levels on busy days. The city's landscape architec,ural firm has provided a preliminary cost estimate of, S1 .5 million for developing the sixteen acres. There will also be an additional cost of $160,000 for curbs, gutters and a sidewalk along Golden West Street added to this project estimate to provide a "finished ed e" along "the street. With a 10 percent contingency includedl, .the entire project will cost $1 ,940,000, Based on the dates the grant monies would become available, the project would he developed in FY 90191. Mo iAi fir....r R.>.. il("ii..'d.•+'.' :,.1SaMl.J+.+.t5 :��i+};jy;p�,Y•',�. � REQUEST FOR CITY COUKn ACTION r", JANUARY 3, 1989 PROPOSITION 70 PER C*.oA GRANT PROGRAM PAGE TWO Staff anticipates using this $565,000 grant, along with $496,000 from the 1986 Bond Act, approximately $100,000 from Proposition 70 Roberti-Z'berg Grant Program and the city's Park Acquisition and Development Fund monies to develop the site. An application will also be submitted for the Proposition 70 Competition Grant Program by October 1, 1989. The State Department of Parks and Recreation has indicate) that these grant programs can be used together for a single project. On December 14, 1988, the Community Services Commission approved recommending this sixteen acre development project and the application of funding under the Proposition 70 Per Capita Grant Program. FUNDING SOURCE Grants and Park Acquisition Development Fund ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1 . Do not apply for the Proposition 70 Per Capita Grant Program funds. Z. Apply for the funding, but designate a different park development project. A Resolution Location Map M8:mh 070CE/33-34 . � ""^�rer:.Anh:,►177i1.Yiki'rrw+.. .�r..► :1� .a:sr:...r4;.^.H'Y:�?�tr.,vJt:irl�+�'ttiH,',c7Ytanccx+:JLw+ii7�1fA►yirMlhtOE11��� . 1 ;I REQUEb ( FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION_ Dots September 23, 1988 S*ffihw to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Prapered by: Paul E. Cook, City Adminf strator "`ram Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Service sub)"t: HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK EQUESTRIAN CENTER COMM Apno,VSG by G&TY COUr4CIL�. cMmkwt with coun011 Pocky? tw YM I l 14@w Pocky or Excipti Stntett►ent of Iwo, ReoammeWation,Anrlvsh, Funding Source,AFtemsti om I STATEMENT OF ISSUE There is a need to define who may serve as a boarders' representative or alternate on the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center Committee. RECtyi WWATION Modify the boarders' representation section of the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center Committee to state: Boarders' representative and alternate on the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center Conmittee shall be persons who actually board horses at the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center in the specific row or barn being represented. AMYSIS Staff feels that the City Council 's intent at the time of forming the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center Committee was to have a coimmittee composed of boarders representing specific rows and/or barns to insure a good line of communication on a contir,:ing basis, and for a fair democratic system to exist on the committee for the hearing of matter_ related to the equestrian center. The City Attorney indicated in an August 10, 1988, memo that the wording utilized In forming the committee was too broad for this specific definition of a boarder representative. To eliminate confusion and provide a clear definition of who may be a boarders' representative or an alternate, staff recommends that a representative mist board a horse in the row and/or barn being represented. FUNDING SOURCE N/A ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Follow procedure set for city commissions and boards with City Council liaisons reviewing applications and City Council voting to select committee members. ATTACHWVT Gail Hutton's August 10, 1988, memo ✓ 0706E/24 sac spa 77 IMH.+M.fesr-r...-+.....�...�rw...vau►:am.r•ws:r'r•»�..:yr,. sa ....:.�.... .�..s l.. n.'.� i.. .".�l'..{;.., •N,!' - �( .. ,r,. �7,,:;'.iP old rtilMrKYll I ;1 CITV OF HUNTIN�iTOW SIUMCMH ! INTER-DEPAR?MENT COMMUNICATION KNTPCVQ 1 IV" To Max Bowman From Gail Hutton and City Attorney Jim Engle Subject Equestrian Center Committee Gate August lop 1988 Status of Linda Shue After Eviction and During Appeal STATEMENT OF PACTS On August log 1988, jim Engle advined this office by telephone that the Stay of Execution with respect to the Linda Shuo eviction had been denied. Mr. Engle further stated that Ids. Shue had accordingly removed her horse from the stable. QUESTION PRESENTED Can Meg. Shue remain on the Cquestrian Center Committee? 8RIRF ANSWER Yes, unless the procedure is amended. ANALYSIS The relevant provisions governing the grievance procedure are summarized as follows; 1. Problems of the "Equestrian Center users" are to be resolved by the procedure. ( Emphas�"aigded. ) 2.. "Concerned Boarders" are to ,submit written issues to the Committee. j ��CiMM711.1M'.AR•Jl1WYfMi.J'i1p Y1+�./��.[itiZ.vC.1fL7Cfn,s•.?!w�•hrh`4i r.1in • CeCy�.„ :;*?zai::T.;.;(,. `s,•..-. . r��.• ....:4'z,:.•s:,tCau:R!..ra,ar`wYrK`1fiy1 3 . Tile Committee consists of management and community services respresentatives and "representative or representatives for each row of paddocks and each barn with one representative for each twenty stalls in a given cluster and two representatives for c waters up to forty stalls ." (Emphasis added. ) 4 . The Committee will hear grievances, find facts, etc . and "function as an advisory body to the management and City Council regarding center services, facilitiea and operation. " (Emphasis added. ) I note that there are no provisions for removal of a representative nor is there a requirement that the representative be from among the group represented. The operative term in the procedure appears to be "a representative for each group." Accordingly , I find no requirement in the procedure adopted by the City Council which would require the removal of a duly elected representative for a given group. if the intent of the City Council in Adopting the grievance procedure was to require that a representative be 1) a boarder and 2 ) from amongst the group represented, then the procedure should have been drafted accordingly. ' Additionally, since the scope of issues to be presented concerns all Equestrian Center "users" (NOT JUST DOMWERS) , with respect' to services, facilities and operations, it would appear that disqualification based upon boarder status would be inconsistent with the broadly drafted coverage of the procedure. w x... .. • . � �, :i... .•M i.1 ti.1.{,ji}l.'- �.tit--';.'a ti.ir gl'.p4R'�RA'MRiMMr� y CONCLUSION ~Since there are no requirements in the grievance procedure for representatives to be boarders and there are nc removal requirementar i find no authority to remove Ms. Shue from her elected committee member position absent an amendment to the procedure adopted by the City Council . 0 IL MUTTON Clay Attorney /cib 3- yIrwrMw.-_•- '^.M�N.M.�r.rrr lM[/W.^w..ti�.w-....+w+...�..•..,[:r t:3 y. i ii.Liilr..:i:71'Cr►N�'r811aiS'�1�+{1V�':L'd�'iv:�idbACk.� ,. REQUES ( FOR 01tY COUNCIL ACTION Data April 51988 $Wm*W to: Honorable Mayor and City Council ' Paul E. Cook, City Admi ni stratorl*-��' Pr.perd by: � � Melvin M. Bowran, Director, Community Service yam nr ot �x ccavNCti. ��' N07'ICE OF COIPLN:TION, HUNTIN6TON CEARRAL PAAI( � EQUESTRIAN CENTER -- -----. �` Consivwt with Coundl Polky? le Y" New Policy or Exoepti - Stetwtwnt of low, Reaommertdartlon.An lysis, Funding Soures,Attw wrdva Actkwo,Attec hmenw. STATEMENT OF ISSUE National Equestrian Centers, Inc. has completed the !mprovements of the retention basin and separation structure at the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center as required by its lease with the city. RECtMMDATION 1. Take front the table the N&tice of Completion for the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center from the April +, 1988 City Council meeting. 2. Accept cowletion of the retention basin and separation structure .projects at the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center and instruct the City Treasurer to release the $10,000 cash bond securing the performance of construction. ANALYSIS Pursuant to National Equestrian Centers, Inc. Assignment of Concession Vownt with the city, Section Three thereof required lessee to provide a Z000 cash bond to guarantee construction of the retention basin and separation structure at the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center. The Acting Public works Director recently advised that the retention basin and separation structure for the equestrian center have been satisfactorily completed. Therefore, it is appropriate to release the s10,D0O cast! hand. FUNDINGE Bond on file in City Treasurer's office. ALTENilbITIVE AICTI0NS Do not authorize return of bond. AY'fli'C5 Memo from Les Evans, Acting Pk:bl is Works Director Memo iron Oenni s Krejci , Comnuni ty Bevel opment Deputy Di rector 14M.0 mb O701%/12 �L�fY(L.�Yrra«�..+..w,v+wr-wm�J.:c:.rPiU.,:a;,.w m+:. Ft',^,. .i., :ta.'.,(�; a.5.� 71..5/'. .�,r•G+Vr.....w...^• r..+w+-n.+.w..wr++Lnrw..�sn� y •a f EN CITY Or til,/1�1'�IN1ti�twn � A�C tH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Jim Engle From Les AEvanspeActing superintendent, Parks/Rea. Director of Public Works Sublecc Equestrian Center Date March 16, 1968 M:. Milligan has satisfactorily completed the retention basin for the equestrian center. You are authorized to release any bonds which you may be holding to guarantee this work. LE:lw CC: Tom Blackburn Bill Patapoff 1 •! wy r(+.,.�N♦.a..;y:'MMIFrd�7M7•nwNwM1.�....wkii WM>•M#\1iROi:/ypM1110�]Y �1 1 1 REQUE%ro 'l FOR CITY COUN ' ACTION Deft March 17, .1988 gub�itgr 'The Honorable Mayor and City Council tttod bV• Paul E. Cook, City Administratock ` Prttptrn�ld by: lvin M. Bowmen, Director, Community Servic NOT E OF COMPLETION, HUNTINGTON CENTR RK BQUSSTRIAN CENTER Suboa:Cafflis of with Coundl 1 14 Yes t ) Naw Policy Exosp lon ! RtstWMMt of Itwe.Arootn stion,Analysis, Fund 4 , Aitsnatal" Actions, Atwchnonts: STATEMENT OF ISSUE National Equestrian Cent rs, Inc. has c pleted all improv•.-mrnts at the Huntington Central Park uestrian C% ter as required by its lease with the city. RECOMMENDATION Accept the improvements at the t;ntington Central Park Equestrian Center and 4 instruct the City Treasurer to et ase the Labor and Material Fnyment Bond and the Faithful Performance r•nd ecuring the performance of construction. ANALYSIS ,_. Vur%uant to NatioZc ,.e strean Centers Inc. lease agreement with the city, i+�,rtian Vl1.F. thequired lessee t provide a Labor and Material t i'aymeat Mond andh►ul Performance nd to secure the performance of the construction ountington Central rk Equestrian Center. The Acting Public Wortor recently advise that thrr retention basin for the equestrian center. en satisfactorily comp ted. This was thl: last improvementrequ' the lease agreement. FUNDING SOURC .�.. Bond on file n Cite Treasurer's office. ALTERMAIT ACTIONS { Do not a hors ze return of bond. ATTACH ENT Memo rom Acting Public Works Director )AE:cs y :j *40. 006 4AM .009 :,•N ye n� Lim CITV OF NVNTIIi1iiT�iN i N INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION �urrww�o► �� � A . C J To Jim 1:tagle From Dennis Krejcl Parks & Recreation Buildis Division Subject HUNTRIGTGN CENTRAL PARK Date Alwil b, 1988 EQUESTRIAN CENTER Condition number three of the Assignment:of Concession Agreement executed by the City of liuntftton Beach ud thrs comessionait•e states the "A;ssitt a shall constntot a ' retention buln and separation structure to protect Huntington Lake from slitatikm and organic contamination". Please be advised that the assignee has satisfied the p(rtion of the condition relating to the separation structure to the satisfaction of this Division. Therefore, if the retention begin has been mxtrtstructed to the satisfaction of the public Works Department, the $10,000 cash bond, as reciuirred in the agreement, may be released, DK:Jr (03I149 r. . : � <•.: .� Y tI A I ,r• 1.i•.; 'X1k !4 QI't • EQUEw . FOR CITY COUNC��� ACTION DateMarch 12_ 1988 lfubtritted to: The lionorable Mayor and City Council o 1- A Submitted by: to Paul E. Cook, City Administrar��,,( P►oWed by: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Servic i14RrKEQ1JESTR1AN Sum: Nt1TICE OF COMPLETION, HUNTINGTON CENTRAL CENTER CoWstwt Leith Cwirscil Policy? 1A Yes ( IN" Poi icy or Ex(Aption SWW,w it of law, Recohr~dstion,Analysis, Funding Source,Altmative Actions, Attechmomb: STATEMEt'T OF ISSUE National Equestrian Centers, Inc. has completed all improvements at the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center as required by its lease with thr city. RECOMMENDATION Accept the improvements at the liuntingto%i Central Park Equestrian Center nand In6truct the City Treasurer to release the Labor and hiateritil Payment Bond and the Faithful Performance tiond securing the performance of construction. ANALYSIS Pursuant to National Equestrian Centers, Inc. le,sse agreement with the city, Section V11.F. thereof required lessee to provide a Labor and Material Payment Bond and a faithful Performance Bond to secure the performance of the construction of the Huntington Central Perk Equestrian Center. The Acting Public Works Director recently advised that the retention twain for the equestrian center has been satisfactorily completed. This was the last improvement required by the lease agreement. FUNDING SOURCE Bond on file in City Treasurer's Office. AL7ERNATIVE ACTIONS Do not authorize return of bond. ATTACHMENT Memo from Acting Public Works Director JBE:cs no uM 4109 . .. _. '_. .....,,�.,.,.......—+...--..��.•.�•...i-an.. 7.rRR..�iw�:.v»iiy A:YWSStt'CL/1KSV/..M.Y:.�W.a. r+r+.f}Kf+aYw� 7 ` it y.. . 6 1 1tt � PIC. tip C1W HW"IN WW MACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Jim Engle From Les Evans, Acting Superintendent, Parks/Sec. Director of Public works Subject Equestrian Center Date March 16, 1988 Mr. Mi.111gan has satisfactorily completed the retention basin for the equestrian center. You are authorized to release any bonds which you may be holding to guarantee this work. LE:lw ccs Tom Blackburn Bill Patapoff t '1 t�y71YM�•� �11arvr�w�Nrl�rr� r+•.wv.YM+p►RI.w+�Iti��..Yw .uyKINQ.'. :eA!)Ql/. Fri f1L rI.M.� 1 \iiC Q.4Al�U1n.;.A�G?AnttMh7rM]rIIPIIY /��Mw.A1r�iR % : REQUESs FOR CITY C0696ICACTION Date Aril 13, 1988 lEh6mMed thy: The Honorable Mayor and City Council (,) &IbmttW by: Pau! E. Cook, City Administrator V �' C.V PntWsd by: Melvin M. Bowman. Director, Community Services ,0,Vv UY C1 Y gubjeat• NCP EQUESTRIAN CENTER EVICTION PROCEDURES Candboant with Coincil Policy? (x) yes ( j Now Policy or F.xosp W Stet malt of Ism, R*vmr"*WM1on,Analysis, Funding Source, Aitamatiw A ts: STATEMENT OF ISSUE There is a need to establish a process for eviction of bonrde•rs at the HCP Equestrian Center. RECOMMENDATION Establish a rule at the HCP Equestrian Center as follows: "All boarder evictions shall be subject to a standard procedure approved by the Director of Community Services in order to insure due process." ANALYSIS Currently, there is no established process for eviction of boarders at the IICP Equestrian Center. As part of the city's rule—melting ability defined in the Nattonsl Equestrian Centers, Inc. agreement, the city can establish an eviction process. The Community Services Director can define a pros-dure Which assures dire process and sets the appropriate guidelines for evictions. FUNDING SWRCE None ALTERNATIVE' ACTIONS Allow equestrian center management to establish eviction process. ATTACHOINTS City Attorney opinion ]BEtcs 00 phi 4 M MMJI,II.MWA,M1►S M..rrMVHU►wwTwlr.ti+wr!Wy+t".•...•M...V Wry...wV...n.�.�`iw. .. `y W..�.N.`i..Rr:ifMr Miw.N.MwM f w.+`w..+.uwMw�vA..,.7►.IR�I.'.•� REQUEST OFF CITY COUNCIL iCTION DO% Uri 7 198A Submitted to; Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Admini strator l.0 Prop@fWby: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Se 1 s�� subod: HCP EQUESTRIAN CENTER FYICTION PROCEDURES I Goal"mi wlth Council Policy? ( y Ya Now Policy or Exception Suunmm of ssui e, RerommwWation.Analysis, Funding Source,Altemstiye Actlom, Att anonts; STATEi IT W ISSUE There is a need to establish a process for eviction of boarders at the HCP Equestrian Center. 6 RECIMlE1iDATIOi1 Establish in the HCP Equestrian Center rules a prevision for due process with regard to eviction of boarders through the grievance procedure. AI_NKYSIS Curr�mtly, there is no established process for eviction of boarders at the NCA Equestrian Center. As part of the city's rule-making ability as defined in the agreement, the city can establish an eviction process through the grievance procedure. the City Attorney can define due process and set the appropriate guidelines for evictions. Council approval of this procedure will ensure that boarders recefve duo, process upon notice of eviction by equestrian center management. FUNDING SOURCE None ALTEnNATI11E ACrioNS Allow equestrian center nanagewnt to establish eviction process. ATTACHWXS City Attorney opinion M M:mb 0706'E173 Flown �y...�++... .. ....-..^..•�..i»..'^•.�wM•r�.sr+..w...� .w.... ��ritr'c stsltM+..S.:nosWl/ +....r�.+nr...+w•»,...�+r�.+�.»•�... . Ili y i I CiTX OF HUNTINGTON MACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MAX BOWMAN GAIL HUTTON To Director of Community Services From City Attorney Eviction Procedures April 12, 1988 Subjatt Equestrian Center Date Question 1 : Does the City have authority to establish a procedure for the conZesssiena to insure due process for the termination of a boarder by National Equestrian Center, Inc.? Answer 1: Yes Discussions The concession agreement at sections X and XIIt (attached) gives the City the power to regulate the manner in which the concessionaire conducts business with respect to the public and i its boarders by virture of its broad rulemaking authority. ! further, the Fourteenth Amendment of tho C. S. Constitution, which I guarar:tees due process, has been interpreted to apply when "priva;`.e individuals use state and local governmental properties in conducting businesses open to the public" as is the case here. (Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority (1961 ) 365 vs 715 6, L Ed. Zd 431 61 S Ct 856. Question a: If the answer to Question #1 is year what wording should be included in the procedure? Answer Z; The City's rule making authority at section X11I of the agreement allows for fi management rule in conrtuction therewith . Such rule may be framed in lai'guage as follows", "Rule 4 All boarder evitions shall be subject to the grievance prrn;edure and are hereby deemed invalid, in the absence of due proceay. Notes "true 'Process" as a minimum 'requires Prior o,�t'.c,l. f the viol&tinrs which may result in evictions and a reasonable • opportunity to be heard with respect to the grounds for eviction. Question 3: Can we make the Equestrian Center Committee part of the process? I, Answer 3 t Yes .Riscusaion.� The CoitLee was created to addreem grievances relating to,.the:_ ; ; operation of the center. . MR17.N.�sakr►•wl.i•w+•ar.:+4'�.r• tarre.;.\GtL•;.�ay.'L't+i Div.w.....�..r..:•..•,.:_,.....i'S,f;�1•'.:�iw. � :.'7.'[.1Si?:� /' .:+t� 4f121l�AAti� l• Max Bowman Page Two April 12, 1968 The-above "rule if 2dopted by the City Council would have such an effect. (See January 28, 1988 procedure) , onclu_ lion Where boarder evictions are concerned: 1. The City haft the authority and the duty to in are due -rocess; 2. The exercise of such power may be in the form of a management rule; and 3. Such rule may include use of the committee in order to implement the spirit and letter thereof. r+� To u City Attorn /cb �f:�.�,Y�'n'I'.,'..►w.....�..r..rw.rw+4aaNrh4ri4 MiNMT1.vp R..w ..r .w.. .-):..r;.7.�M .1:T::#i:L\:�'H.7A7.,:.+:MSMJN`It':r.l....I...`w. h..�J.w+«n'.w..M4waMh.IMjrr�lA { I eJ-9 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION k�+na April 5, 1988 SlAbMitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Ut $ubtt : Paul E. Cook, City Administrator PMW'sd bV: Melvin M. Bowan, Director, Community Servic 5ib)M' HWINGTON CENTW4L PARK MASTER PLAN AND SURY ,.,..•�-'""""'� cs . Commwt with CoundI Poiky2 I I yeg I 1 New Polkcy or Exception 8tftea wt of Isnw,Ro ommendstkon,Analysis, Funding S3ouroe, Attam dve Acdiom,Attaeh►amu: $TATElM OF ISSUE There is a need for council direction regarding the undeveloped land and park facilities in Huntington Central Park. RECOMMATION lnciude the recreational facilities on the 1988 survey for Huntington Central Park in the Capital Improvement Projects budget and develop as funds becwae available through the Park Acquisition and Development fund, General fund, donations and/or grants. AMiAl."IS 'As a result of joint City Council study se.lisions with the Community Services Cammission and staff on July 11 and August 18. 1986, h survey was prepared, reviewed by comission and council and sent to Huntington Beach residents through the water bill . At its lurch 2s 1987 meeting, council referred the survey mulls and the Huntington Central Park master plan to the Community Services Commission and staff for review and recot"ndation. There were 46,500 surveys distributed through the water bill, mobile homes, civic center, and recreation centers. 'toe city's cable television station carried infonsetion about the survey and newspaf,er articles informed the public as well.. We received 12,600 responses to the survey, a ' 27 percent return rate. Overall, tho public wanted the undeveloped sections of the park to be passives open grass areas with picnic and playground areas. There war also interest demonstrated for some of the more active types of recreational facilities. "own wa y,gyf�•� vw� ��,yy • . yr+,w -r. r r ....�.0 i.r' w�<• .. . . .... ..f � ������i4`1�„[�Yi'AYti�4ti�T1�++���lt.f��•:.} �afl�•. Y 7�.. r''jr��Ylt1+�f/rl�yr+b'1'e: �'I'•'1,r.'V'.�..t11.'VsS�''i�'f � REQUEST FOR CITY COUi mk ACTION rIONS Page Two HUNTINOTON CENTRAL PArca< MASTER PLAN AND SURVEY April 5, 1988 In 19870 the Huntington Central Park master plan and possible funding sources were reviewed by council at its June 15, August 3 ind November 16 meetings. On December 7, 19810 staff was directed to prepare a second survey for distribution to City Council , nine city advisory boards and commissions, the Chamber of Conaaerce Board of Directors and selected city staff. Of the 194 surveys sent sent, 118 or 60.8 percent completed surveys were returned. Staff has now tabulated that information. As in the first survey, the top vote-getter was the passive park with picnic and play areas. Huntington Lake renovation, Talbert Lake renovation and Sully Miller Fishing Lake development were the next highest choices of survey respondents. Although Huntington and Talbert Lakes were not on the original survey, Sully Miller Lake had also been a top choice behind the passive park with picnic and play areas in the first survey. Results from both surveys are attached. Staff ree m mods that the proposed recreational facilities on the second survey be included in the Capital Improvement Projects budget, since funds are not available at this time. These facilities can then be developed as funds i become available through the Park &,quisition and Development fund, General fund, donations and/or grants. As part of the budget process, facilities and associated priorities would be reviewed annually by staff, Cowunity Services Coermission and City Council . FMIWA saw[ 1. park Acquisition and nevelopment Fund 2. beneral Fund 3. Donations 4. Grants IDLY M11Tlvt ACTIONS 1. take a bond issue to the voters for development of the passive park with picnic and play areas at a cost of $10,800,C100. 2. Take a bond issue to the voters for development of the passive park with picnic and play areas plus renovation of Huntington and Talbert Lakes and the development of Sully Miller Lake at a total cost of $13, 4250000. ATTACIKNTS Comparison of 1986 and 1988 Surveys 1988 Survey with Results 1986 Survey with Results Huntington Central Park Acreage MNS:nb 0706E/69»70 1 COWARISM OF 19t16 S1illYEt AID 1lMAt0*WEY iM NOW WATS LN Sam-MATS Permute Overall Overall Of votes Patin$ ihting Zvi (ham prforitll M-toe chotce) Activity Ike n� /1•tes toff) passive Areas 57.2 1 Passive Areas (including picnic and playground areas) 3.73 1 Picnic Area 66.8 2 Included with Passive Area 0 0 Playgromad Area 51.1 3 Wfuded with Passive Area - sully 0t11er Lake 50.1 4 Sully Miller Like 2.99 4 Oft street Improvement 48.5 6 Pitt in survey - - Comw l ty/Ibc Center 44.7 6 Coassinity Center with nasfus 2.85 7 "tanicai Gardens 42.3 7 Nst in Survey - - Wor Aquatic Complex 35.4 6 Swiawiny Pool 2.1117 6 SoftMlt Fields 29.2 9 Softball fields 2.41 a tlya• alwa 21*5 10 Included with Commity Ceetor - • T Mis Oasplex 26.7 11 Ibt in Survey 4 [gwstrio Trail 26.0 IZ Equastrian Trail 2.34 It 7h*se-Type wesuurent 25.5 13 !bt tN Survey - - 3apsnete Tie 44rdon 26.2 14 Tea Garden 2.04 14 P601tia1lhomr Fields 24.7 15 Mt in Survey - ftetgeettboli Courts 23.9 16 Not in Survey - - 6*"p Cee VVWd 23.3 17 Broup Camping 2.56 10 �. Prisbee Golf Course 14.4 16 Not in Survey IMt 1n Wrvty • _ Huntington take 3.63 t Not 1n servey - - Talbert Lake 3.21 3. IMt is S WWV - - lhoater in the park 2.93 6 Mot is Survey - - Golf Course 2.60 9 Not in 3rrvty - - pand:fond 2.64 11 Oct in Survey - - Mobile Hoare Park 2.05 ; 13 31�1 ei4-i•da `517ivf+i.�i:�aulNi�G4st.:+7i+�:+it�a3�r,,,h:.:rsc►xr+at.Y,::.;;':.;.7.:4�,..:c(Y►.:�+iiXYC+fak`r+ �G' B��iw im, 1988 HUNTINGTON_ CENTRAL, PARK -SURVEY OVERALL- RESULTS Arithmetic Mean Scores (ranked from highest to lowest) (Priority of oevelogment) 1. 3. 73 passive/Natural Areas 2 . 3.53 Refurbish Huntington Lake 3. 3.27 Refurbish Talbert Lake 4. 2 .99 Sully Miller Fishing Pond 5. 2.93 Renovate Theater in the Park 4. 2.87 Swimming Pool 7. 2.65 Community Center With Gymnasium S. 2 .61 Softball Fields 9. 2 .60 Golf Course: l0. 2.56 Group Camping 11. 2.54 Undstand 12. 2.34 Equestrian Trail 13. 2.05 Mobile Home Park 14. 2.04 Toa Garden * only Passive/Natural Areas, Refurbish Huntington Lake, and Refurbish Talbert Lake are proposals with a majority in favor (man score of 3.00 or higher) OYERA11 TOTALS Priority of development overall to 1 2 3 4 hi. 5 total mean ElateWnt Passive/Natural m 3. 73 1 Areas 8 17.6 7.4 10.1 13. 8 50.9 25- 3 Sully Miller m 2.99 4 -Fishing-Pond 1 22.3 11.6 20.6 19. 6 17.8 Swi=inq pool m 2 .87 6 6 30.5 8. 3 25.0 15. 7 20.4 ccanunity. Center m 2.85 7 wit-h. c,ymna.ium • 29.4 14.7 20.2 1298 22.9 Renovate .Theater /i 2. 93 5 , in the Park 19.3 14.7 33.0 19.3 13.8 Tea Garden 2. 04 14 1 54.2 15:0 13.1 0.4 M 9.3 Refurbish to 3. 53 7 Btu n on Lake i 9.7 .11.5 26.5 20'.4 31.9 dstand m 2.54 11 i 34 .2 16.2 24.3 11.7 1.3.5 Eois* trian Trail ea 2.34 12 t 31.8 14 8 26.9 J. 3 10.2 Golf Courie m s 2060 : i 47. 3 5.4- 9. 8 12.5ly. ' 25.0 661thall Fields -m 2.61 8 . - 1 , 3505 13.1 19.6 17-.6 14.0 Mfaicbiah , A 3. 27 '�+aaC zsk• i 118.0 11.7 23.4 18.9 27.9 f. mow.nriri1i.�...nr 7 rr4���Yr� Mobil• 09" park 9 2. 05 13 6 65,-7 .98 6.9 8.8 17.6 0 ' 23 23 14 1$ 106. croup Cawing m 2.56 la 0 37. . l2 3 21.7 13. 2�. '0) 1988 HUNTIN&TON CENTRAL PARK SURVEY Most Requested Funding Source Passive/Natural Areas . . . . . . 35. 11 Taxpayar's Bond Sully Miller Fishing Pond. .13.91 Taxpayer' s Bond & Park Acq.+ Deve. Fund Swimming pool. . . . . . . . . . . . . .33.1% Taxpayer' s Bond Commun. Ctr. with Gym. . . . . .33.6% Taxpayer' s Bond Renovate Theater in Park. . .26.6% Donations Tea Carden. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35.2% Donations ' Refurbish Hunt. Lake. . . . . . .25.9% Park Acquisition & Development Fund Refurbish Talbert Lake. . . . .26 .6t Taxpayer' s Bond Handstand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 .0% Donations Equestrian Trail. . . . . . . . . . .26 .21 Donations Golf Course. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 .5% Develop Park W/O New Taxes Softball Fields. . . . . . . . . . . .24.5% Park Acquisition % Development Fund Mobile Home Park. . . . . . . . . . .34 .8% Develop Park W/O Now Taxes Group Camping. . . . . . . . . . . . . .21.3% Develop Park W/O New Taxes * An additional column ("user fees") was added on the "Overall Totals" j sheet due to the numerous write-ins suggesting this funding source. . r Funding Source($) user 1 2 3 4 5 gees total 1! Passive/Natural Areas 16 .8 35 .1 20.1 9.7 14 .3 1.9 42 S Sully Miller 1i „�•Fishing Pond 16.9 23.9 23.9 14 .1 16.2 4.9 Swimming pool 12.1 33.1 16.1 14 .5 13.7 10.5 Community Centel: i With G mnsaium 14.5 33 .6 17.6 12.2 13.7 . 8.4 27 1 Ranovate Theater r In the Park 18.9 18.9 22. 4 26.6 10.5 2.8 9 is 37 23 105 ; Toa Garden 8.6 14.2 15.2 35.2 22.0 4.9 Refurbish Huntington Lake 24.5 21.9 25.9 11.6 15.0 1. 4 Banda Land 23.1 13.9 22.0 26.0 13.0 1.6 e Z23 7 Equestrian 'Trail 12.3 13.1 21.5 26. 2 21.5 5.4 84 Golf Course 10.7 13.1 21.4 14. 3 21 3�44..5 6'.0 � 14 Softball Fields =: r '12.7 19.1 24.5 15.5 19.1 9.1 4_17 ff ._ -Refurbish Talbert Lake . 21.0 26.6 21.6 12.6 15.4 2. 8 Mobile Home Park 16. 7 12.1 1.8.2 12-.1 34.6 6.1 17 71 23 15 23 9 108 Group Camping �.....,..��.. =,15 2 1,� 9.4 21. 3 .13.8- 21,3. ..6 3J......_.�..._. f 1988 HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK SURYCY COMMENTS 1. no bonds (2) 2. no private developers (5) s. $10,740,000 is too much to merely develop a passive/natural area (3) 4 . "Taxpayera shouldn' t pay for individual/special recreational interests 1 " (1) 5. Get revenue generating activities into the park . (3) 6. Try to maximize the possible bond issue amount. (1) 7 . mobile home park for relocation only (2) j B. no mobile home park (4) 9 . Try to develop passive/natural areas for everyone to uso . (13) 1C. Try to improve the park with as many recreational facilities as possible . (1) 11. no golf course (2) . . . yes on golf course (1) 12. no equestrian trail (3) 13. yes on aocces; fields (1) 14 . keep Frivbee golf course (1) 15. refurbuah park. . . Rnly1 (1) 16 . top priority for developing Community center (1) 17. use reclaimed water to irrigate the park (1) 18. suggentions for the implementation of user fees (4) * responders who scaled their responses (some or all) differently than the values r?rovJ.ded (13) OVEMLL TOTALS FAMILY sI2E 1 2 3_ 4 , 6 7 i 6 41 20 25 8 3 1 5.6 30.0 18.5 23.1 7.4 4.6 2.8 avoraga family size. . . 3. 1 AGI: GROUPS 0-5 6-12 13--20 21-35 36-55 56+ i 12 20 47 66 144 49 t 3.6 5.9 13.9 19 .5 42 .6 14 .5 DISTANCE ADJACENT Nmile lmile 2mil.es Smiles 4miles Smiles 5+miles 4 S 22 20 27 10 7 12 3. 8 4. 7 20. 6 18.7 25 .2 9 . 3 6.5 11 .2 r HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK SUrVEY 1988 This survey is prepared at the request of City Council to allow you to provide input into the development of Huntington Central Pnrk. Indicate on your card by checking the appropriate square the number of family members and age groups your vote represents. Select the recreational activities you would prefer having incorporated into Huntington Central Park. It is also requested that you choose one or more means of funding this development that Is acceptable to you. Spaces are provided for you to indicate other suggested recreational facilities, funding sources or your general corm+ents. 1 Please return the completed survey card In the enclosed, self-addressed envelope to the Conwnity Servic-s Department. Your preferences will be tabulated and the results forwarded to City Council. if there are any questions regarding the survey, please contact Jim B. Engle or Max Bowan at 536.5486. shank ycu, FAMILY SIZE (circle one): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Your City Council AC! GROUPS (indicate nuehor of featly Members): 0-5 yrs 6-12 yrs "3 20 yrs 21-35 yrs _ 36-56 yrs 56 up ESTIMATEq DISTANCE YOU LIVE FROM HUNTINGTON CENTR& PARK: Adjacent 112 mile 1 mile 2 miles 3 miles 4 miles 5 wiles mre PRIORITY OF DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL NAINT 8 DEVELOPMENT FUNDIN4 ***• RECREATION FACILITY LOCATION COST OPERATION COST LO HIDei SOURCE(s) Passfve/Natural Areas In Undeveloped (open space, picnic, play areas) Portion of Park $10,140.000 1-50,000 1 2 3 4 5 Su11y Miller Fishing Lake In Undeveloped 650.000 15,000 1 2 3 4 5 Portion of Park Swinning Pool In Developed 4,800.000 150,000 1 2 3 4 5 Portion of Park Coafwnity Center with Oymasiun * in Developed 6,000,000 150,ODO 1 2 3 4 5 Portion of Park Renovate Tbeater in the Park In Developed 660,000 6,000 1 2 3 4 S Portion of Part TN Garden In Developed 2,OOD,ODO 150,000 1 k 3 4 S 1 Portion of Park Refurbish Huntington Lake In Developed 275,000 6.000 1 2 3 4 5 � Portion of Park Bandstand In Developed 175,00D 1.600 1 2 3 4 5 M Portion of Park Equestrian Trail In Developed 600.000 2S,000 1 2 3 4 5 Portion of Park —""— Golf Coarse " In Undeveloped -0. -0- 1 2 3 4 5 Portion of Park SoftAaii Fields *" to Wdeveta ed 1 500 000 4- 1 6 Portion of Park 2 3 4 Refurbish Talbert take in Developed 11600,000 15,000 1 2 3 4 5 Portion of Park Mobile Nose Park (15 acres) In Undeveloped .0• -0- 1 2 3 4 5 Portion of Park --"'--"'-- group Camping Otveloped or 850,000 25,000 1 2 3 4 5 � ,- Undevel ope'lf' * Pool We and t0voonity center Mil be constructed on a portion of the frisbee golf course, so that no existing as{w park is eliminated. •+ Privote company could huiid and ow rate 9-hole executive golf course with driving range and pay city u portion of the revenues. a++ Softball fields maintenance and operations cost are paid for by adult softball league registration fees. ++*+ FUIM1I110 SDIM4CE What method or methods of fur-ding would be acceptable to you to pay for developing the park? Write in the spaces provided above the appropriate numbers . as iistcd below, of acceptable funding source(s). ' 1. General Fund 3. Taxpayer's bond (axample: 110 million bond would cost each honowner 11.40$1000 of assessed evaluation annually) 31 Park Acquisition and Devol"at. 1-und (developers fees, no charge t4 the public through taxes). These funds are limited in amount of $500,000 per year. �4. Donations 6. Develop out the park without any direct charge back in the form of new taxes to the general public. I COMMENTS Y is t r7m To co uiITY sE Ica OETARTD4i;N2' my MARCH 3. 1988 � IIM I� NEDUT1011 FACILITY LOCATION 1• 31 lassfre/Wtxai Areas In lJndevel-wed - �Qn� �i@IL� PS1�k '•�` ��- • � � form spice. vicnic- play areas) Portion of Park • t � ... ����¢�- T � •a. '� Z Sully biller >asMnq Lake In lledeveloaed • • •,�s •� Portion of Park s „ V •o .. W ••. 3 sWiwlfn9 Pool In Developed • • a•a aaa •sy = Fortiori of Park er • t s Cow inity Center with Gymnasium In fieveloped 7 �• •�• • *0 a+. �• Portion of Park t •s ss 4W j •w•a••-ta"a•i'!•a� w•a•••r •o fir•••!- • /1 .��.�y:��.0168 �• !1 : • •• :r a• a r 5 Renovate Theater in the Park In Developed •a•+ �� i •• o woe jP •• •• a• •a •e Portion of Park •a ••• a•aii•=a•o •r. ••• as •• a {• we •gr i-.i�� a atea0 It V • •• :°. 6 Tea Garden In Developed �-- -. Portion of Parr 0 • •1. eoe aoa � a• • — „• w- a R •- • P . • • • a • •'• •-�r�•• • •• •.•a a�,•� 7 Refurbish Huntington Lake In Developed SJ • Odraa • 1-�e �I so Portion of Park � ,m Qo 's • _e• as as •a - !••a•• +a•`.••aa•is - ..- B Bandstand Ir. D-velored • a •• • •�' • Portion of Park • • • CIMSMFI • -!.� !: AL" 9 EW-striae Trail In 'le-.loped oa t.*Aeon _ Portion of Park • •a-• r7t60 1000MO 10 Col f COurte In Undeveloped a •=•i a � y Portion of Parr �• '• 11 Softball Fields In !Undeveloped 1• s - '• i Portion of Park •• t •"b: :i • •4 ii • • a'i- • K -' 12 Refurbish Talb,rt Lake In Developed :•� i•&i• • ILL Portion of Park • •• ••e • •mar - • •=S so•• •+.le• •e+ '-&item is * �• 17 lfoDil[ !loom Part i15 ages? In Undeveloped • • as Portion of Park • It Group Camping Developed or w • �Q llndevelope•S i 2 . I 1 �Q - • - ':• Developed Park Undeveloped Park Aria eou-M be mi ther a gaff course XS IDES•wi sre ar open space vitA piemal'pliy ir2a rnmtsle:sra&s HUFRINGTON CENTRAL i ..K SURVEY RESULTS 1986 ACTIVITY NUMBER AND PERCENTAGES OF VOTES NO HIGH LOW M G11 A LOW NO RESPONSE LOW 6 NO 1 . pass ive!»atural 8,439 1 ,940 10,379 707 1,474 2.647 Areas 67.2t 15.4% 02.6% 5.6% 11 .8% 21 .0% ?. Picnic Area 0.304 2.219 10.603 708 1 ,169 3.007 66.61 17.6Z 84.4% 6.3% 9.31 23.9% 3. Playground 6,416 3,106 9,522 1 ,594 1 ,444 4 700 51.1% 24.7% 75.8% 12.7% 11.51 3f.4% 4. Sully Miller 6.291 3 379 9.670 1 479 1 411 4 658 Fishing Lake 50.1% 29.9% MOT, 11.8% 11.2% 36.71 i S. lmprovreeents 46.5% 21.9SB 79.4% 16.0% i�6S 31.9% 6. Co"nity/Rec 5,617 3 203 8 900 2 291 1 369 5 574 Center 44.:�z 2l�.2% 76.9% 16.2% 117.9s 44.4% 7• GGaarrdensal 47.3% 27.1%401 66.4% 20,1%519 16.6% 43.2% a. Major Aquatic 4,444 3,365 7,809 3 341 1 410. 6.706. Complex 35A% 26.8% 62.2% 24.6% 11.2% 53.4% 9. Softball e ds 24.2% A.4% H.6% 24.6% H.9% 6fz9t 10. vonssium 30455 3.997 7,453 3,G47 1 ,560 7 544 27.$,E 31.8% 59.3% 28.3% 12.45 66.1% 11. Tennt s 3.355 4,000 70355 3,714 1 ,49). 7•-714 +Cospl ex 26.7% 31.et 58.5'% 29.6% 11.9% 6f.4% 12. Equestrian Trill 3.Z59 4 514 7 773 3,276 1.511 7 790 Improved i 26.0% 31.9% 61.9% 24.11E 12.01E 61.0% Expanded 13. Theme-Type 3 206 3,791 6,997 4 193 1,370 7 944 Restaurant W.Si 30.2E 55.7% 31.4% 10.9Z 63.6% 14. Japanese Tea 3,670 4.196 6,680 3.073 1,621 71269 Garden 26.2% 2810% 53.2% 35.1% 11 .73 63.1% 15. fields Soccer 241� 31.0% 57x7% HAS H.0% G 624 EN 16. Racqueffial l 2 9" 4,298 7.296 30621 1 ,643 7 91'9 Courts 25.9% 34.2% 58.1f 28.8% 13.1Z 6.0% U. Campground WN 3% 2f.1% SA.4%326 33-22 U.4% 64.3% 18. Frisbee Golf 1,Bii 41 Z21 6,032 4 743 l jeS 8,964 Course 14.4% 33.62 48.0% 37.0% 14.2% 11.4% 19c1b IIUNTINGTON CWrRAL PARK SURVEY COHNEWS TOP TWMVE 11MESTS PRIORITY C OMMWT NO. OF COMMENTS I 1. Leave the park as it is! (Passive) 11010 } 2. Develop the park as planned. 161 3. Bike and jogging trails. 113 4. Cool needed 100 S. Golf Course 89 6. Appreciate having an opportunity for inp,%t 88 7. No caapIng facilitiea 86 8. Enough devele}xwnt already 78 9. Develop with no increase to tax payers �+ (User Fees) 77 4(( ' 10. Ample parking fer new facilities 69 �i 11. Do not apcad any *are stoney SO 12. Now development for everyone, no special Interest 49 i , t r F .� +.....rw�. _....._ .. �rrn,TpwwW.+.IrY+.ri/f�.'.}l/rr,H.r.rrr..w^vN.Ai:•.Y+.1.-.V'.,..i..:i l::Y.:::.V I:..HIi�.+^,: Ir,y,f...,.�.........w..+....-•....�. �ww.�-w+.� •j' HINITINGT N CINYPAL PARK 19A6 Dear Huntington beach Resident: Enclosed is it survey card prepared at the request of your City Council to allow you to provide input into how the undeveloped areas of Huntington Central Park ray be developed in future years. Indic4te an your card by checking the apppropriate square the number of family members and aye groups your vote represents. Select the recreational facilitias you or your family would pprefer having incorporated into 1W tin9ton Central Park. You have a choice of high, tow and no priority ino pclarity being that you are totally against the facfitty). Sppace is also provided for you to indicate ;,ther suggested recreational ficilitles or your general comments. Please enclose the completed card with your water bill payment. Your preferences will be tabulated and the results forwarded to your City Council. If there are any questions regarding the survey, please contact Jim D. Engle at 6364S485. Thank you, Family Site (circle one): 1 2 3 4 vi 6 7 8 9 10 Your City Council Age Groups (indicate nud*r of family members): 0-5 yrs _ 6-12yrs _,_,.13-20 yrs 21-3S yrs _35-SS yrs _56 up ACY IV IT f ER I0R ITV ACTIVITY, P11101tITY HL,,,arr N,o Rao Major Aquatic Complex Thease-type Restaurant ..... �yasnaifus Footbal /soccer Fields CoasawnityiRec Center — Improved and Expanded —"— Softball Fields Equestrian Trail Japanese Tea garden -`—' Racquetball Courts botanical Gardens Picnic Area Felsbee Golf Course .1WlIy Miller Fishing Lake Playpraund Passive/Natural Areas Gr6up Campground Off Street Improvements Ter4k a Complex ..__ .» --- planting, sidto e �ssmpprove �.. _.._. park/street side east:.etics) Ctmmwntss a kETU N StVEY WITH WATER BILL PAYMENT • 1 . f i . 1 t 1i1MTIMCt'Qii CNNI�A'"`'ANk MASTER PLAN ��. '� .�.�• ��� `� Notes Facilities listed above Are •'t tentative) proposed for the �� r=. •r!.w �Y orea""""s no d. Not all surveyed Facilities have been projected i• =.` ' r for a spcclElc location Ott this I ��:� fl��`• `„ of m facilities �� %•, = d S +"�'•�?. time. Final placeent ,`. jJ y+ will be made after survey results , :��'•. l� ♦:,,, �.� 1 are compiled and park masterly eC�. = is completed. r• I, - - '• �.� Cad k1.^��•—��. ' dw � :-4 ��'� •- - SeLOM Lon, aGap UMW 1 1 �>'=• .ti, 1 A ��'. f � it �as7�.1 � 4 �� • ' i t •,• .,}� ,ul+wrw wI� �j Tic Gt�M�ilCEO=• ��1 •� jTL CRIM ,.ii ._.. Rtf'► •- --_ _ ^.__x+A�R�=`yam.:.� - I l { I • i i HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK TOTAL ACREAGE Developed 21o.5 acres Undeveloped 163.5 acres Master planning now - 138.5 acres Mushroom Farm - 25.0 acres Total 380.0 acres UNDEVELOPED ACREAGE NEST OF GOLDENNEST i Went of Goldenwest at Talbert 16.0 acres open Space/Picnic Arca 16.0 acres Meat of Goldenwest, North of Ellin 57 .5 acres Open Space/Equestrian Trails, Picnic and Play Areas 55.0 acres Parking - Lot off Ellis/17 ' spaces 2.5 acres RAST OF tac)LOBNNEST East of Goldenwest, South of :'filbert 43 .5 acres open Space/Picnic and Play Area 24.0 acres Parking - Lot off Talbert/75 spaces 1.0 acres Lot off Gothard/150 spaces 1.5 acres O.C. Transfer station 12.0 acres East of Goldenwast, North of Ellis 21 .5 acre* iSully Miller Lake - Water Area 13.5 acres ' Land Area 8.0 acres Total Undeveloped Acreage Currently Being Master Planned* 13Ey 5 acres *NOTE: Mushroom Farm 125 acres) is not included in the figure above because it is not being master planned at this time. l s f ( 10/23/87 } r: w�wr..+,. .. v............rw...�... •.'•er✓r• > w w.� .....r ......•.�_r w •.r• r , .. ) •t:J•'L.•r,.'LL4:fA1l.Y«ie•M Wtirr.r...w•v rr.YYr+yw�w.�+�.�+.r• ••...w..�r. a REQUEST FOR CITY COUNLil. ACTION lz//7 7 &k74- -Av ��IpopoDate November 3, 1987 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submittadby: Paul Cook, Interim City Administrator ! 7L, O" Prepared by: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Service bp) Subject: HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN AND FUNDING f L /l_��, _ S? )y Consistent with Council Policy? O Yes ( J New Policy or Exception " A--2 Statement of lssue, Recommendation,Analysis, funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attschmonu-. ,( STATEMENT OF ISSUE There is a need to adopt a master plan and establish the opethod of funding for the undeveloped area of Huntington Central Park,. i RECMENDATION MOTION fl : Huntington Central Park be primarily passive with open grass, trees, picnic, playground, specialty gardens and lake area. Also, include in the master plan a swimming pool , community center with gymnasium, equestrian trail improvements, bandstand, children's library wing and renovate the existing amphitheater. Estimated development cost is $28,000,000. MOTION #2: The Huntington Central Park development be funded through a General Obligation Bond. This General Obligation Bond would be paid back through the General Fund by instituting a trash collection fee. The children's library wing to utilize $1.600,000 of General Fund money available because of the additional revenue to the city returned from the Public Facilities Corporation (PFC) funds. The General Dbligation Bond funding for $26,400,000 and General Fund for $1,600,000 would pay for the $28,000,000 in park projects. MOTION 0: A General Obligation Boni for an additional $7,000,000 would be utilized to pay for other city unfunded capital improvewnt projects such as renovating flood contrnl channels. This bond would also be paid for through the General Fund by instituting a trash collection fee. The General Obligation Bond to develop the park and for other capital improvement projects would total $339400.000 ($26,400,000 for the pork and $7,000,000 for other city projects). 11MAL.YSIs At its August 3 Meeting, City Council referred the proposed master plan funding of Huntington Central Park back to the Community Services staff for further research. ►Own t,Ay...w-.�.w.-.. ..... �.-.�....r......r.+r...,.wr✓�..-..�....... ... _. ...-...........�...r.......r•...�-..•.. W-,....+�.w..........�....�..-......r+�.��1 REQUEST FOR CITY COUA'l ACTION n PAGE TWO wwriNGTON CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN AND FUNDING Facilities proposed for the park are as follows: FACILITIES ESTIMATED COST Passive/Natural Area $10,740,000 (open space, picnic, play areas) Sully Miller Lake 850,000 Swimming Pool 4,8000000 Community Center with Gymnasium 6,000,000 Amphitheater 660,000 Gardens 2,000,CDO Huntington Lake P75,000 Bandstand 175,000 Equestrian Trail 500,000 Childr•en's Library Wing 2,000,000 Talbert Lake -0- SUB70TAL $280000,000 Less General Fund - 1,800,000 Park Portion of Bond b26,400,000 Other Capital Improvement P mjects 71000,000 (i.e. , flood control channels) TOTAL BONDING AMOUNT =33 4 0 0 The Talbert lake. Renovation Protect is eliminated from the master plan based on a staff's concurrence with a councilperson who indicated that the area is naturally a meadow, not a lake. It would be more realistic and cost-effective to retitle the area Taibert Meadow. 1 Staff was directed to look into ways to generate revenue. Staff explored the options of a golf course, softball field and parking ;deters. It is estir--ted that a nine-hole executive golf course with driving range woul( met approximately $100,000 per year in revem* to .the city. Due to the ,�.rge number of acres required and the survey result dtich pointed toward a more q y s passive Park, a golf course is not proposed at this time. Staff also reviewed the possibility of developing two softball fields. A separate revenue bond for S1,500,000 could be used to build this complex and then it could be paid for- with user fees from the adult softball program. Currently, the adult softball leagues consist of only 42 percent Huntington Beach residents; therefore, staff does not recommend this option. r 'REQUEST FOR CITY COUI L ACTION t"14% PAGE THREE HUNTINGTON CENTRAL. PARK MASTER PLAN AND FUNDING There exists 1,468 parking spaces within the park system. If metered at fifty cents per hour, they would generate $260,000 per year after the second year. There are 345 additional parking spaces proposed in the master plan, plus an undetermfned inumber in the swimming pool/gymnasium/recreation center area. This would generate an additional SE0,000 for a total of $320,000 annually. If parking meters are implemented, it is '"aff's recommendation to offer a free parking pass to residents. This wo<<` reduce the overall parking revenue by an estimated 50 percent, but would he promote the use of the- park by Huntington Beach residents. Several methods exist for funding this master plan proposal. A $26,000,000 General Obligation Bond could be put before the voters for the entire Huntington Central Park master plan. It is estimated that the annual cost of a $26.000,000 General Obligation Bond at 6.." for a thirty year term would be 29.60 per $1,000 of assessed evaluation for a Household. Staff retzmends a General Obligation Bond, where the city pays back fie bond with General Fund monies. If the General Fund is used, the bond issue is not put before the voters. Currently, the city pays the trash collection fee for housing of four units or less. All others directly pay for trash collection. Based on 44,000 out of 68,000 housing units, the cost per household is approximately $4.75 per month to generate $2,500,000 annually to pay back a $33,400,000 General Obligation Band. Council could enact this new fee, thereby charging each household for trash collection instead of only a portion of Huntington Beach residents. The $3,500,000, or a portion thereof, in General Fund monies now earmarked for this pay,wnt could then be redirected to pay back a General Obligations Bond, This bond could be used to ccNnplete Huntington Central Park and other city unfunded capital improvement projects such as renovating the flood control channels. Unfunded capital improvemnt projects have been prioritized by each department. City Council would determine the overall city priorities once the funding program is adapted. It is estimated that $2,000,GOO per year would be needed for the park and another $500,000 per year for the other unfunded capital improvement projects in order to pay off a $33,406j000 bond ($Z6,400 000 bond for the park and $7,000,000 bond for other unfunded c-ipital projectsi. FWAIM6 SOMME General Obligation Bond ' ALTI MATIYE ACTIONS ? 1. Include Talbert Lake renovation in the master plan at an estimated cost of $1,OfJO,00D. i 2. Develop a nine-hole executive gulf course with driving range on approximately forty acres, and use revenue from the course operation to par back the bond. 'this would reduce the bond by $3,100,000 (based on $77,000 per acre), -_•--..........�...— •- •---...,...r-. ...,•. :C,• • .. - ,..c v:. ,.. 'r...... ....._....v.,...•r✓ ,ry.... r.q...a^., .. ...w.....r.....�.v...-.+.....�.w.....��w..+.w..•.w�w-...w.+.0 • i.2:a,1 . j " I l AM REQUEST FOR CITY COIL ACTION PAGE FOUR HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN AND FUNDING 3. Develop two softball fields with parking at an estimated cost of $1,500,000, and use revenue to help pay back the bond. This would reduce the bond by $1 ,230,000 (based on $77,000 per acre). 4. Install parking meters in the park system, and use the revenue to pay back the bond. This would reduce the cost of the bond to each household. 5. Install parking meters in the park system with free parking passes for local residents. 6. Place a 326,000,000 General Obligation Bond befori the voters to pay for the bew recreation facilities. 7. A General Obligation Bond alternative is to present each project as a separate entity so the residents could vote for those facilities they want to see developed in the park. For example, a resident might vote for the j $10,740,000 for passive/natural areas, but vote against the bandstand bond ` issue. 8. Instead of a bond, development could be on a "pay as you go" basis. i Institute a trash collection fee, thereby freeing up existing General Fund ; monies for constructing facilities in Huntington Central Park and other f unfunded capital improvement projects such as flood control channel inprovenents as the money becomes available. This avoids the necessity to pay interest as is the case with a bond. 9. Consider professional survey of citizens' needs related to Central Park and capital improvements related to the city. ATTACH ENTS 1 . Bonding/"Pay As You Go" Analysis 2. February 12, 1987 Golf Course Report r 3. % l9, 1987 Parking Meter Report r 4. June 5, 1987 RCA on Huntington Central Park f S. Huntington Central Park Total Acreage 6. Master Plan Diagram ' i dW7806�53-56 .r.--�.... .......•..•�.-.�T-...�.rTH�r1'lJ:....h.:RLr.aVf:.. aA .�.{ ti.n.R4•w. .Y'.4ti.,n ..v 1 y 1♦. tiI WhWaVOWUMOPW Jig �1 Attachment 1 BONDING ANALYSIS 6.5% Interest/30 Year Terra ANNUAL PAY BACK COST: Pay Back Cost Bond Amount $1 ,000,000 $13,000,000 $1 ,500,000 $20,000,000 2 00 000 52p000,000 s2,500.000 $33 000 OGO rl■�r�■r r. �■r �..r Irr...r.ra.+r .r■r �IrrJ u. $3,000,000 $40,000,000 $3,500,000 $45,000,000 COST PER HOUSEHOLD: Estimated Annual Cost per $1 0000 Assessed Evaluation Bond Amount 11.4� 310,0001000 17.1e $15,0006000 22■8f $20,000,000 28.5e $25,000,000 34.2 $30 000 000 37.69 $332000 000 i ■ 1 39.90 $35,000,000 "PAY AS YOU 60" BASIS 6% Interest Rate First Year $2,6000000 End of Second Year 151150,000 }� End of Third Year $8,000,000 } I 0706E/57-10/23/87 , f .+.�..».-....._�._.......-._--+.�•�...crw.m..aea».Y. v.,...' ,.....;.t•-- ..1., ... - R� tt . .. ..... .. ,... ..,.:a.�iiJas!:;9t=�+' .a jtia-1•r'1,,j/YI/.1I►�.1M�MAIyVrn (f I i BEST PhOTOGRAPHIC I { i' t REPRODUCTION { r i POSSIBLE, ]SUE TO 1 r AGE AND CONDITION � OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS so 10 W'1....�'.�rn+1P.w"NC7�.:���l�..i�Ay�Q'...,r ...�r..n nKn.,rpp`�`�5���'a,. - .—r--:,. .•�. ,.�5'.l` T'� :',J.'rJ��. �,��� r rfi .rt i , , 2i •- �CITY.OF H U�I_TI �Tt�isP - 0, B E CITY UN COM MUN IC�ATIO \Afttb%"MACH .et••• 110NORAHUJ MF.YOJt AND CITY COVNCIJ, Mr:*tI)ERS,�pU �OUNGYLMi:"ERS�p .I:�►i�a C1MALES Vt. 'iROMPS0,1 . MmYs and WINCnI,L _ : .••- J E CT AD HOC COh4SITTEI✓ I'QP, 1iCP MUES'i'JtYAN DATE June 15, '�1981 - CENTER - The ad hey commiti:ce supports the Pirector of Community Survioaa° ` 1racoi mendat:ion to authorize negotiation of atnendmenta to the laase ' agreoment with the National Equestrian Centers, In corpora i:ed, that , would address concerns of the boarders, lesnoc and Lhc citizens of he.--community. 'rho• committee 1,10111l •like the council's autlioxixation to continue its study throughout July and prevent itu recommended amendment Priorities to tl!e City Administrator by July 31, 1987. It •iu the committee' s intent to establish a working group ,thit includes a croon-section .f the Huntington each- equestrian interested citizens. Thi group would explore community .nactds in a series of ►ncetinga and a tour of other equestrian facilities' prrnoced make--up of the group would represent the Community Scrvi.as •Ceitumission, concerned F1CP boarders, satisfied 11CP board- ern, non-11CP boarders, Englishing ridinq 1'CP boarders ani d llgflte.rn 11CP bourdern. �•.' . . . wmsn . . . . • '.i . ,. ,t fir. , 1 .I tar , t. `.- Z•;•(1T1�,��•.WJ* �fAr'�•rT:: , _, .. •i f ' J ��^ •i ;7.1V At , l} `r r' � . i •� 1 r •1 � �+i o, =T`�1� � _q) 47) •-- �pHf1fC1K1'TI�fG� �� � tltalwt uaa � r r� y 11 I `I ,R£KaV EATER t 1 f ECV+LTY ` . J • 'ANA I ��fcf'' � ,S '� "�- `� 'P!ZyIMC•Ai1EA + 7�C't� r � ;�' �i i t 1s_ ACRCS s MAYPARKING LOT 1 Ht/71A1fO11 Ws a raYN ( 1.5 AWLS ! sl `�,� ',_ •, 1 77'. .�-r-^�- + `t"�r- . SPACES +� ~w 1wJ Lw.11 IIA,W -;. ' I I • 'I � ;i1.5 AC I AA • ....!....-•--"- �t �•ram r-_ ..r � I+h �...z _—r` arm--x} Yn► -PAf'1040 LT l 2.5 ACMES t W/ 170 f PAID(Vin SPACES y } 1 iiwwow CENI RAL UDARK MASTERPLAN CITY OF R .UNTIN♦, TON BEACH 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BJE ACH l INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION �uMrwcur+rim To: Charleu W. Thompson Prom: Max Bowman, irector City Ad►nini►►trator Community 3e .vices Svbject: HCP MASTER PLAN Date: June 9, 1987 .,n RCA. for the Huntington Central Park Master Man has been submitted for the .Tune 1.5, 1987, council nieeting. The MECOMENDED ACTION io as follows: Continue this i ten to a study mansion wiLh the City Council, the Community Nervicee c:omdinuion and staff to a date certain. MO I JIlE:am 1. ,r f ^ � C REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION June 5, 1987 Oate Submitted to: honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles H. Thompson, :I ty Admini st li ` Preperod by: Melvin M. Ilomnan, Director, community Services $iq l: ,0b Subject: HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN Co,,e,,rc:4, tv,* t AM*#%A- PM A v,r e s w.•.r w�tl�' col-Ab unt with Ctxlncil Potici? f�'! Yaa ( J New Policy or Exception ,5a�w t 0� It s 1 k0+ew-T �1_ O n �.„ r.Jwy w Statement of Issue, Hecommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actio-W,Ati.echmentR: STATEMENT OF ISSUE There is a need to adopt a uwster plan for the undeveloped land and park fac;lities in Huntington Central Park utilizing a general obligation bond to prcvide financing. RECOW14CAT ION COMMISSION RtC"ENDATIONS: MOTION #I : Huntington Central park to tie primarily passive With open grass, trees, picnic, playground, garden and lake areas. Also, include in the master plan a swimming pool , cwmunity center with gymnasium, equestrian trail improvements, and Phase I improvements to the existing amphitheater. A SZ5,000,000 obligation bond will be presented to the voters as a vehicle to pay for this development. MOTION 02: Huntington Central Park master plan should include only Phase I of the amphitheater at a cost of $80,000 and omit the botanical garden. STAFF RErC"ENOATION: MOTION #I : A high pepcentage of the undeveloped areas of Huntington Central Park should be developed in an open, passive way for the people who .:ant to stroll through the park and have picnics and family outings. Of the total number of acres available, 4 acres, or 4.1t could be used to provide other recreational outlets such as are available with an aquatic complex, community center and gymnasium. MOTION 02: Staff also recommends that a major bond issue be developed to provide ail necessary funding for the full development of Huntington Central Park. 'Ibis would include all elements of the finally adopted Master Plan. It is further recommended, that the City Council direct staff to prepare and present a complete analysis and comprehensive financial plan. MO e/�i M 04 4 REQUEST FOR CiTY COUNCIL ACT" June 5, 19$. HUNTINGTUN CENTRAL PARK MAST . PLAN Page Two AM LYSIS On July 12, 1986 and August 18, 1986, City Col►ncil conducted joint study sessions with the Community Services Commission and staff. It was dete nnined that a survey would be sent to Huntington Beach residents through the water bill. In the interim, on February 17, 1987, City Council approved Phase I of the amphitheater at a cost of $214,000 and phase I of the bandstand for $72,000. On March 2, 1987, the survey results were tabulated and City Council referred the survey and master plan to the Community Services Commission and staff for review and recommendation. There were 46,500 surveys distributed through the water bill , mobile homes, civic center and recreation centers. Twenty-seven percent or 12,600 responses were sent back to the city. Overall , the public wanted the undeveloped sections of the park to be passive, open grass with picnic and playground areas. There was also interest demonstrated in same of the more active types of recreational facilities. Survey results are attached. The cormiission and staff are in agreement with regard to creating an overall passive park with open grass, trees, picnic, playground, garden and lake areas. They are also in agreemrt that there should be a swimming pool , community center with gymnasium and equestrian trail improvements. While the Community Services Commission does not recommend the botanical garden, staff s t environments d be included. C ii i o also feel o van a of garden envlron s caul � ss n Y 9 feels that renovation in the amount of $80,000 for the amphitheater is satisfactory. Staff would like to seek complete renovation and improvements totaling $660.000. Also, staff has included the bandstand, though the commission has opposed this facility's development in the park. Commission and staff feel that a c i ty of our size should have a complex with a swimming pool, gymnasium and recreation center, Huntington Beach is a beach city without adequate aquatic far,llities to make residents "water safe, " It is also felt that, with such a facility, the city can maximize its aquatic potential for senior citizens, adults, youth and the handicapped. The community center with gym^asium can meet a wide variety of recreation interests on a relatively small plot of land. It provides the city with the opportunity to maximize the use of the park for the greatest amount of people. Commission and staff are proposing using a ports,)n of the disc golf course (approximately four acres) for the site. This will not impact the existing passive park or the undeveloped park acreage. The Community Services Commission has not had an opportunity to respond to the children's library wing or improving Talbert Lake. The Library Patrons Fousidation, Library Board, Friends of the Library and Friends of tt„,i Children,*, Library have expressed support for the children's wing. Talbert Lake is included due to the public cornents about the lake drying up each sim mr and the impact on the wildlife. t . i REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACT r June 5, 1987 HUNTINGTON CENTRAL. PARK MASTL . PLAN Page Three Facilities praposed for the park are delineated belnw: FACILITIES CC MISSItk) STAFF Passive/Natural Area $ 9,740,000 $ 9,740,000 (open space, picnic, play areas) Sully Miller Lake b50,000 850,000 Swiaming Pool 4,000,000 4,800,000 Community Center with Gymnasium b,000,000 60000,000 Amphitheater 800000 660,000 Garden 2,000,000 2,011U,000 Huntington Lake 275,000 275,000 Bandstand -0- 1751000 Equestrian Trail 500,000 500,000 Children's Library Wing - - 2,000,000 Talbert Lake - - 1 ,000 U00 Total $24,245,000 $28,000,000 A portion of a major bond issue can be substantially offset by pledging monies from the Park Acquisition and Development Fund, and Other sources, thereby reducing the actual cast of the bold to the Huntington Beach residents. Commission and staff support the general obligation bond to finance the Huntington Central Park development. If Council approves the concept of a bond i issue, staff will provide a complete analysis and comprehensive financial plan. FUMING SOURCE General Obligation Bond ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS � 1. Separate the bond into several issues so that the public can vote on specific facilities. 2, Do not develop the undeveloped portions of the park at this time. � . ATTACMENTS Proposed Master Plan i HCP Survey and Results L MMB:mb 0706E/44-46 f . I i .. a ;3 •'1 � 1 f - fi AENOV TEO ti AM"j EATER 'J 3' PECIALTYr , tr i '•. .. ��; GAP.l)EN Ct��JRQlsi ` WWLI��nr,• mLor .. A ,r v. TC� J 1.0 ACRar,I W 1.10 ACAS jam' 'IT ► WHEN SPACE � � '•� J MAY AAEA t'"11� r`��••C /� Y �- �'t-'• PIt1�KWJ LOT--- ACRES I W/100 PAW Of3 _ SPACIES .� Ni � , �uu�•wun its acm �a�A�_mow. .•i�' x.^� � ;•, �.� � Y. • 1� VY(`tn j ��' • 1S� 1 PAAKMG 16r _ 2.6 AZMS I W/ 1TO PARKOM sPAcaS CE.N.Tf��►L iQ MASTEw" LANmo CITY OF HUNTW INGTO►N BEACH i HUNTINGTON CENTUL PARK .� SURVEY RESULTS ACTIVITY NUMBER AND PERCENTAGES OF VOTES NO HIGH LOW HIGH b LOW NO RESPONSE LOW b NO 1. Passive/Natural 8,439 1 ,940 10,379 707 1 .474 2,647 Areas 67.2% 15.4% 02.6% 5.6% 11 .8% 21 .Ot 2. Picnic Area 8,384 2.219 10,603 788 1 $169 3,007 66.8% 17.6: 04.4% 6,35 9.3% 23.9% 3. Playground 6,416 3.106 9,522 1 ,594 1 ,444 4 100 51.1% 24.7% 75.8% 12.7% 11 .5% 3).4% 4. Sully Miller 6.291 3,379 9 670 1 479 1 411 4 858 Fishing Lake 50.1% 26.9% 7).0% 11.8% 11.2% 34.7. r S. Off Street 6 090 3 498 9 Soo 1 261 1 711 4 759 Imprnvcrrents 46.5% 21.9% 71.4% 16.0% 13.6% 33.99 6. Conunity/Rec 5 617 3 203 8 gLU 2 ?91 1 ,3a9 5,574 Center 44.7% 2�.2% 76.9% 1i�.2% 10.9% 44.4% 7. Botanical 5,315 3 401 8 716 2 619 1325 5 920 Gardens 42.35 2�.I% 69.4% 26.11 16.5% 4f.2t 8. Kajor Aquatic 4.444 3,365 7,809 3,341 1 ,410. 6,706 Com{ lex 35.4% 26.8Z 62.2% 26.6% 11.2% 53.4% 9. 11 6 .4% d.6% P4.5 Fields 297.Z 370 3 % U.9% 0.9% 10. rowas ium 3.456 3.997 7,453 3,647 1 ,560 7 544 27.5% 31 .8% 59.3% 28.3% 12.4% H.l% 11 . Tennis 3,355 4,000 7,355 3,714 10491 7-714 Coupler, 26.7% 31 .8% 60.5% 29.6% 11.91 6f.4t It. Equestrian Trtil 3.259 4,514 7 773 3,27b 1 511 7,790 , Improved A 26.0% 35.9% 61.9% 26.1% 11.0% 62.0% Expanded 13. lheme•-Type 3,206 3,791 6 997 4.193 1 ,370 7984 Kestaurant� 25:5% 30.2% 59.7X 33.4% 10.9% 65.6% 14. Japanese Tea 3,670 4,196 6,680 3,073 1 ,621 70269 Garden 25.2% 28.0% 63.2% 35.1% 11.7% 53.1% 15. Football/Soccer 3.100 4,146 7.246 3 678 1 636 7 824 Fields 24.7% 33.G% 57.7% 29.3% 13.0% 63.3% 16. Racquetball 2 998 4,298 7.296 3,621 1 ,643 7,919 Courts 21.9% 34.2% 68.1% 28.8% 13.1% 63.0% 17. Group 2.929 3,397 6,326 4,671 1 ,653 80068 Campground 23.3% 27.1% 50.4% 37.2% 12,.4% 64.3% 18. frisbee Golf 18911 41221 6.037, 4.743 1 ,785 8 964 Course 14.4% 33.6% 48.0% 37.8% 14.2% 7f.4% IIUNTINGTON UNTRAL PARK SURVEY COHHMTS TOP TKMVk MQUESIT.5 PRIORITY CON"21T NO. OF COORIT 1. Leave the park as it Is! (Passive) 1,010 2. Develop the. part; as planned. tfit 3. ilike and ,forging trails. 113 4. rool needed 100 S. Colf Course 89 G. Appreciate having an opportunity for input 88 7. No cam1iing facilities 86 Ft. r1lourh development already 78 9. Develop with no increase to tax payers (Deer Fees) 77 10. AMPIc parking fur new facilities 69 It . Do not spend any more money SO 12. New development for everyone, no special intet•ogt �� s • t. HUWTIIKTOM CENYM FARX SURVEY 1966 Gwwar Huntington beach Resfdent: Enclosed is a surrey card prepared at the request of your City Council to allow you to provide input into how the undeveloped areas of Huntington Central Park may be developed in future years. Indicate on your card by chccking the appropriate square the numtrer of family an bers and aae groups your vote represents. Select the recreational facilities you or your family would prefer having incorporated into Huntington Central Part. You have a choice of high, low and no priority (no priority being that you are totally against the facility). Space is also provided for you to indicate other suggested recreational facilities or your general convents. Please enclose the completed card with your water bill payment. Your preferences wilt be tabulated And the results for'rtarded to your City Council- If there are any questions regarding the survey. please contrct Jim U. Engle at 536-5486. Thank you, Family 5ise (circle one): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Your City council Age Groups (indicate number of family members): 0-5 yra V 6-12yrs 13-20 yrs „21-35 yrs _ 35.55 yrs _56 up ACYIVITY PRIORITY ACTIVITY PRIORITY !I `Taw "�0 11- ---rose No Major Aquatic Complex Thew-type Restaurant cowasium Foutball/Soccer Fields Lommemnity/Rec Center Improved and Expanded Softball Fields Equestrian Trail Ja artwse Yea Garden -"'- Racquetball Courts boUltcai Gardens —" " '— Pienic Area frisba Golf Course Salim Miller Fishing Lake Plsy►ground "�- Passive/Natural Areas Group Campground Off :'treat Ismprovemients Tennis Complex kur•bs, street side planting, etc. to improve park/street side aesthetics) Comm nis: RETURN SURVEY WITH WATER BIi.L PAYMENT U�91f:/3 t �,,..•ram:.,,........__ .. ........�.., ...:•-'s-'.r . [i .. .'., ' .. ., , . .. .' ....o>...- �.�......-.... ... l . HC 0 _City of Huntington Beach 4.,.1 * P.O. Sol too CALIFOnN1A SUM& N C Prom the t1crh nJr �` � '�• N';in.rnntrfrr vi11�11��+•� S.Aj%6AC1V` CVnt'"an i 3/11/87 Dear Bette: Please ask Alicia Wentworth to place the following item under my council comments for the 16th (March) meeting: Golf Course in Central Park. nequest that item he referred to the Community Services Commission for review and recommendation to council. f fThank you. I t i i i 1 cp CITVf OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COUNCIL, • ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION -' •. �., '''. ntr.l INC I(1M ftAktf � •�, ( . , , lionoryble Mayor and Charles W. Thum n, To City Council Members Fram City Administrato , HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK February 25, 1932 Subject SURVEY RESULTS Date �f' 1, . �:�s t c 1•C Attached, is a communication from V_tx Bowman, Community Services Director, and a ropy of the Huntington .ventral Park Survey Results. This item will appear on the City Council's March 2, 1931, Agenda. City st ff %ill he recommending that the survey be forwarded onto the C;cmmunity Services Commi!sion for their review and prioritization). it is also, recommended that alter the Community Service Commission review tho City '-nflf)r'il o-t 1 4oWy tirS�lnn to the HCP Survt`v rossilts, 113provo tlut Master Plan Pro(t'(7t, ,)nd fif`t-•rm m(- tho ffll!!!If''' S!)(!r —oo, for the dovelt)(f' Vitt of Huntington Central Attachments I i 1 I j f f i t CITY OF HUNTINGTON SFAC INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION [fail iMJh f I4ililM f11 ACN To Charles W. Thompson Fro► ax Dompan, Director City Administrator Community Services Subject HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK Date February 18, 1987 . • SURVEY RESULTS Per City Council direction, the Huntington Central Park survey was sent through the water billing to 46,000 hones plus an additional SOD surveys wtire distributed through comaunity centers, the civic center and mobile home parks. There were 12,560 respunses, which represents a 27 percent return rate. The attached results indicate the public is primarily interested in maintaining passive areas within the park, but there is also interest demonstrated for a variety cf active facilities. lie believe the results are not clear cut and do require some interpretation. Aiong others, there is the ' question of passive areas versus a passive park. A considerable amount of the park is passive now. Out of a total of 202 developed acres, 139 acres or 69 percent of Cie park now developed is passive/open, Developed parkland is an area where specific improvements have been spade. These can be facilities such as a picnic shelter or an area that has been developed as a passive/natural area. The undeveloped park southeast of Talbert and Ell 's could be examined as a potential area for active and passive recreation. This could be clone while minimizing activity on the currently developed park to a very few new facilities that will not impact existing passive areas. The top three types of activities on the survey results (pass ivelnatural areas, picnic area and playground) already exist in the developed area of the ppark. We t;ave proposed similar park activities south of Talbert and east of Goldenwest. Sully Miller Lake was the fourth highest priority on the survey, but the park already has two lakes in the developed section. We feel the city should nut duplicate facilities before it looks at new types of recreation so that the city can meet the leisure time desires of s larger segment of the population. If this premise is approved by you and City Council , the city could point its efforts toward developing priorities numbered five through ten. which are off-street improvements, co minity center. botanical garden (or tea garden?). aquatic complex, softball fields and gynmasium. The survey indicated that S9.3 percent to 76.4 percent of the people ranted these facilities as either their high or low choices - - both of which show a desire for such facilities in the park. With the purchase of the twenty-five acres known as the Mushrow Farts and A. C. Ravion's ten acres, only limited funds are available for development. If we are to move forward with facilities in Huntington Central Park, we will have to explore alternative funding sources. ^ 1,r ^ i 1 i HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK '�EY RESULTS Page Two With your approval , we feel this survey information should he transmitted to City Council recommending that the matter be referred hack to the Community Services Comission and staff for review and Nrfaritization within thirty to forty-five days. After this initial step his been accomplished, a City Council study session should be conducted to review the park survey results, approve the master plan projects and detem.ine the funding sourcas for development of Ifuntington Centre] Park. MH(i:mb 2416e Attachment f . . i ! } I I 1, 1' i f I t ,1 HUNTINGTON MTRAI. PARK SURVIT C.MIMS TOP TldnyI. RL0)111'.-STS !'HI(1RITl C(1MFiMT NO. or C0MMWS 1 . Leave the park as it is! (Passive) 1 ,010 Z. Vevel.op the park .as planned. 161 i Bike and ,jogging trails. 113 ! q. Pool nceded 1ao j. Golf Course 89 { 6. Appreciate having an opportunity for input 88 I 7• No caatping UaOlities 86 8. Enaugh development already 78 9. Develop with no Increase to tax payers (User• Fees) 77 10. Ample parking for new facilities 69 11. Po rot spend any more honey ro 12. New development for everyone, no special interest 49 s i i .�u r, F i llMIii?Dai C13FFM PARK ` i Si RRY BATS t The Huntington Central Park survey was sent to 46.0i;0 hwes through the water bill, plus an additional SW surreys are estimated to har: been distribut*d threuoh the civic center, cmmunity centers and mobile ',aye ;arks. Tt*rr were 12,SW responses. ?his is a txeity-seven percent return rite. ACTIYI.`. WJWA AV PERCEtRAt-S OF YOTES Ci7irWM HIGH LCai HIGH A LOW W WO RESMSE 1. Passive/Natural e,439 11940 10,373 7C7 1.474 Currently, there are 139 acres of passive/natural areas wiL1;n the A:tas 6';.2w 15.45 52.60. 5.611 11.8% 2D2 acres of developed Dark. This is 69Z of the tctal developed acreage. 2. Picnic Areh 8.364 2.219 10,603 768 1 .169 There is seating for 200 people in the picnic shelter, plus individual 60.61 17.6% 94,4E 6.3% 9.3% picnic tables for 365 more people, for a total seating of 556 within the � developed park. 3. Playground 6.416 3,106 9,522 1 .594 1.444 There are playgrounds at three sites in PCP. A handicnt, Flay area, funded sl_ls 24.7t 75.8%, tZ.7; 11.5Z by a state grant, is on the drawing board. 4. Sully Miller 6.291 3.373 9.570 1.479 1.471 There are two developed lakes not: in HCP. A third like i! net nteded to risnin.g Lake 50.15 26.90. 77.0s 11.00 11.21 rate: the short-term demand. S. Off Street 6,090 3.498 9.538 1,251 1,711 This would provide curbs and pla-atiny to Enhance the p3rk's aesthetics on Improvements CB.SS 27.9: 76.41 10.0: i1.61 ;he panic perimeter. 6. Caaaa:nity/Rea S,617 3,283 8.900 2,291 1,369 un similar facilities in MCP. There are cnit two comwnity centers In Center 44.75 26.21 70.91 1B.2; 10.9: Hinting'--n Beach, plus the City C^ 32Aiors Cen'.r_s and Oak View tenter fa ne:glhcrhood c?:ter). 7. Catanical 5,315 3.401 0,116 2,S19 1.325 -there is a :ma'l litertry garden by the library. It is t:. r only such Gardens 4?-3L 27,11 63.41. 20.1% 10.55 facility in HCP. 8. ►4_Jlor Aquatic 4,444 3.365 7.809 3.341 7,410 do similar facilities in 11CP. The City %is has a wall 9 yd x 22 yd pool Ccmpiex 35.41 'N.8: 26.6% ll.Z: dotmtcwr., but its lease ends this year and its future is unknown. 9. Softball 3.670 4.196 7,866 3,073 1,621 No similar facilities In HCP. 1t would round out a total recreation Fielr; 29.22 33.4: 62.61 24.5% 12.9% complex. Though lSelds art not needed now, there will be a demand in the future. 1G. C,;renasIum 3.455 3,991 7.453 3,647 1.560 No similar facilities in HCP. The City Gym is a small Junior high q+1a 2?.51 31.b% 59.3% 28.31 12AS downtown. It is on leased land. Tire lease terminates or. June 6. 1987. 11. Tenn!s 3.3s5 4;000 7.355 3.714 1,491 go similar facilities in NCP. There are 76 courts on city or school C!:rplez 26.71 31.8E 58.5Z 29.6. 11.9% property not. fie demand is bring Lae:. lE. Equestrian Trail 3,259 4,514 7.773 3.276 1.S71 !.:song trail system is two miles long. Future plans call for trails Improved 4 26.0% 35.9% 6i.9i 26.1% 12.0s within the equestrian estates and is adjacent to Boiss Chita Linear Park. Expanded 13. T1me-7ypo 3,2C5 3.721 6,957 4.193 1.37G Them, are two small concessions now in the park. A full-scale restaurant Arstaurant 25.55 3C.25 55.7: 33.45 10.9% could be tied in with Sully Miller Lake or a Japanese tea garden concept. 3 IIIITOIi COWL RAM Pape Two - s�ilr€r {i�r Aa T NIAM AM RQCFWRM3S, w�E�rs 11T011 Let NIGH A LCV a lie"3"M t{ K. .lapanase Tta 2.670 6.00 3.073 1,.6Zi A local Japanese Brian:zation say assist with development zrid maintenarwe. € 6ardea ZS.2S 29.01 53.7Z 3;.11 1.J& This could At a comfit"r and regiontl focal point. i l5. Football/Soccor 3.100 4.146 7.246 3.676 IAA Fmtlballfsoccer fields are located an ;:hoof sites throughout the city. i i Fields 24.7% 33.01 37.7E 29.32 13.01 1%e basic dM&rd is being Wt. if. A.ocpuatbail 2 94J1 4,298 7,2% 3.5Z1 I U3 courts exist in Uere: city 7erts plus schools. The current demand is being C Urts HAS 34.2s 58.77 cs.BE 13.1: met. 17. rsrwp 2 929 3 397 C 326 4.1On 1 663 The =ester plan calls for relocating the existing facility. ) ca"gruaad Wn D.1 x s6.4% 37.21 1 V40- 18. Frisbee GW l all 4.221 6,032 4,743 1.795 The raster plan includes relecating the existing facility to the -ast side course 11.41 33.6% 46.0% 37.83. l4.2E of Wdenvest, if a gyW"al/recreation cents-r wre constructed. A recreatiae camlex would take about five acres, whereas the Frisbee course usas 15 acres. :locating the court, to the undeveloped portion of the part would make availaale an additir4,al 10 acres of passive!open area an the currently dew-eloped park. i i { t FMTLY SUE_ f OF FMILIES FAINTLY SIZE W Fe KIUES AUS i IN AC:E GWM 1 1,254 a On" 0 - 5 yrs 3,210 � 1 2 3.246 1 143 6 - 12 yrs 4,132 t 3 2.60o 8 66 13 - 20 yrs 3.151 t 4 3,267 9 43 21 - 35 yrs 9.019 j e 1 ,25S 10 2S 36 - 56 yr: 12.016 r no response 3,64; S6 a up 4.353 i - i r^" MUI(TINGTON CENML PARK /'IN SUNYEY 1966 IMaar MwntinRton M+ch M:ident: llrrclomW is a survey card pr"wred at the request of your City Council to allow you to provide input into how rd t114 wavaio`ad areas of Nuhtinpton Central Park may r' developed in future years. 14441eate on your card by clftking the appropriate squire the number of family r!rambers and age groups your rate nipr+nsents. Select #w recreational facilities you ar your farally would preftr having incorporated into wintintton Central Paris. you have a choice of high, low and no priority (no priority being that you are 'blully a;:tact %.' fa^ilitv). SMpace 1s also provided for you to Indicate other suggest,,d recreational tacllitlit or your ganar+l compta s. Please enclose the completed card with your water bill payment. Your preferences will be tabulated and the r"alts forwarded to your City Cwneil. if there +re aayr questions regarding the survey, please contact Jim A. Engle at S36.5486. prank you, Family Sire (circle onel: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 'foer city Council Ale Groups (indlcate number of family aeobers): 1 M yrs „_,_6-lZrrs _13-20 yes _0-3S yrs _ 35-55 yes _,- 56 up MUIT TY HfPRiMITY Ac IVITY N Pl IORITY f Nat ow No Mager Aquatfr compiex �. Thee-type Restaurant f�+soseiw Football/Sate:- Field; ,^ to Ifty/Mc Center Impts:red and Expander! (. !r}ttralIt Fields Equestrian Trail J*�pprrmmrrse Tea fiardee " hacquetbal l Courts Wpu fCai fordo, "'— "— Picnic Arta Fria" (*If Course "— Sully Killer Fishing take flayyraue:d `—" Passive/Natural Maas `- itooyu�� Cae Wod Off Street loproyeaents Tn+e1s GDeplex (curbs, streot r,ida planting, etc. to Imprcre park street si(1e aesthetics) I Ces�e�al:!i RETURN SORM VITA WATER HLL 'PAVKWT + o�91us i.. i i I I ti y 4 't _ .J. ^.., t� NOTIMnW CBSK'[RAL PAR:: SMASH PLAN •�"T"""'�rir�=��vsu„�t---`r' Note: Facilities listed above are �'• - tentatively proposed for the areas noted. Nat all surveyed +` ` • v�. "Now _1y -C"T ' Eacilitir s have been projected for a specific location at this �' i +'� :; +�" `- ---•�. . time. !anal Placement of facilities `, a �~ •' will be made after survey results are compi ied and park master plan is completed. - - •_..;�;.,�:.�r?.�} }r !1'•'�V � IF '''' ..•s� u�liir.r .� r �Mn LAW dD i REC 11E T FOR CITY CC)lJO�C �►CTIO Date _ February 24, 1987 submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by., Charles W. Tharpson, City Admini sir o tT' f�0t '•�ti P►ewad by: Melvin H. Bowman, director, Community Servi 3,�.�' Subject: HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK SURVEY ���-''""✓ n_1� � i{ci� . Coralatrm with Council Policy' I,/]l yea ( 1 Now Policy or Ex n statc:nent of Imm, Rwwrnandotion,Andtnis, Funding Souses, Altsmative Actions,Atttchnonts: STATEINT OF ISSUE There is a need to evaluate the results of the Huntington Central Park survey. RECOWNDATION Refer the Huntington Central Park survey data to the Community Services Commission and staff for review and prioritization. A study session with City Council is then to be conducted to review the park survey results, approve the Master plan projects and determine the funding sources for develoomn-t of Huntington Central Pa rk. MALYSIS Per Cfty Council direction, the Huntington Central Park survey was sent through the rater bsll to 46,000 homes plus. an additional 500 surveys were distributed through crAmunity ;.enters, the civic: center and mobile 'tone parks. There were 12,660 responses, which represents a 27 percent return rat*. The surrey informtion has been tabulated. Since '-he Comnunit�, Services Comission and staff were Involved in the original n , ,er plan process and provided input in formulating the survey, it is recommenudd that the Commission and staff be asked to review the results and make a recommendation to City Council. We expect to have the recommendations back to C• ty Council within thirty to forty-five days. FUNDING SOURCE Park Acquisition and Revelopment Fund General F%id Grants Bond ALTEkMATIVE ACTIONS Do not refer this matter to the Community Services Com. Ission and staff to review and, instead, have information go directly to City Council. ATVADiKXT Mane 0r ... .. 0:mb4p �_ ----�- r; 7 _Or r ..rfl HUNTINGTON CENTRAL. PARK SURVEY ORIGINAL. SURVEY: Family S►s: 1 2 3 4 5 F 7 r 9 10 SIUNTINGTQNC[NTRAIPARK SURVEY r ApeCrouas 05Yts.C7 13.21 Yrt.C1 3565 Yrs.I ❑ F rrn.nr ri G12 VraC3 ?T•V.Yfs.t�, in maw ACTIVITY AWnUNTGF momir)' ACTIVITY AMOUNT OF PRIORITY AL:AFAGE r111314 .OW r'10 ACREAGE OIL t OW NO Adwrrlwe►sayrruund 5 Acres ❑ M U 110trycle Molncross 2.10 Awes C7 ❑ ❑ AomowiAwter 1.5 Acres ❑ © ra i"nisture Train 1.2 Acres q p U I1kol,haLwd tnb 245 Acres C3 u C:) 19swt naive 30 Acres ❑ I❑ M Ift1'n WW IWAw Slide) 840 Aires ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 Trap Range 20 Acre C3 C3 U F'VseWriae TraH 35 Ames C7 C C2 1 Family CannMrsund 20 Aves C3 C3 C3 I'19 asetrsen t entw 5.10 Acres C3 C3 C3 1Botanical Gardens 5.20 Acres ,[�larrsr+rsstY 2AraI C3 O M IResiawent/Ciublreusa 2Aaes C3 ❑ amw lawn Oosrling 1 Acre ❑ ❑ 0 tTwwjo Conglaa 5 Acres a C3 A iskatins Rink 1.2 Acres ❑ ❑ ❑ II+Mthrrn Teelnit Cawrpkut 1 Aae C3 0 ❑ Atulliowper,e Sports Field TO.16 A;ra s M =1 8 (Aselsery.Twfa 15 Awes 0 CI 9:7 91OWW4 sladiuns O Acres O C3 ArehMY,NOW 5.20 Acres d C3 © Foolbell/Soccw 4•10 Aces C1 ❑ D too#Cowie. 1204003 D a ❑ Stadium 15000 fAaar-4) 16 Re"laelan FootSetl/Soccer 20 Acres ❑ eJ 0 IGo"cow". so Atrel ❑ C3 Ca Stedium 110,00066111itq1 M ruewliee tFinanciatly Set!Sustr,trinr two"W". !Eto Aaet b 0 M 'InslWes 3 be0s+bsil'raftybell a rwu,dense room, 004061 trobAkw 111/Neh'n Pm rymnss6a,i heridWI mutts,2 nl,etM+r)reurrsa,?6 Yle�1►etlhilnw}wK 1W co wse. 8•16 has I o Cl CT WW4.0 p061,runs,$MCA bow.e11ke&W P01604. Additional Items to be Surveyed (if second survey is done) : ;;aiming Pool - Olympic Size (50 yds) - 25 yds by 415 ft Indoor - Outdoor 1 Jopanese, tea House and Garden i . Baseball Fields ' Softball Fields Motes: I 1. Separate Recmation Center, Gymnasium and Pool into separate items. 2. Eliminate existing facilities such as Adventure Playground and Egljestrian Center. I 0lgtiC/t r . t) ' r Attachment 2 ri CITV OF HUNTINGION BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION M4MINCKA OWN To Charles W. Thompson Fr ax Bowman, Director City Administrator IN Community Services Subject HUNTINGTON CENUAL PARK pate February 12, 1987 EXECUTIVE GOLF COURSE IMTROOUCTION n risponse to CounciI 's request nn F'e.bruAry ', 1987, reRarriing an executive golf course in Huntington Central Park. We contacted Robert WfIliams , President of American rnlf Comnany. mmrtr.rican Gnlf Com^panv leases and nperat(Is Meadowlark Golf Course. It also develops golf courses. Mr. Williams indicated that American Golf would definitely he- interested in huildinq and operating a golf course in Huntington Central Park. OVERVIEW ripresentative from hierican f?nlf and city staff made i site visit to the park to evaluate the feasibility of developing a golf course and possible locations within the park. On the +cost sides of the park there are approximately sixty acres available south of Huntington Lake and the Equestrian Center between Gnldenwest and Edwards. This includes the A. C. Marion property and the undeveloped pr-kland currently used for the enuestrian trails. East of Goldenwest and south of TAlbert, there Are forty-five to fifty acres available north of -the proposed mobile home relocation hark and existing gun range. The minimum area required for a nine-hole executive Golf course is thirty acres and would be apprnxinateiy 1,800 to 7,000 linear yards. Twenty-five acres is needed for a par three, nine-hole course that wnuld be about 1 ,7AE1 yards long. These figures include area fnr a driving range, which the American Golf representative feels is necessary to mnake such an operation prnf i table. American Golf wnul d al sn irefer to hive the fncil i tv l i Blaze(', especially the driving range. Eighteen-hole courses regvire at least twice as much area. Until a conceptual site plan it arepared, the exact area needed, facilities and cost cannot he deterY.iined, host ttr+erican Golf Company is building the David L. Baker Executive Golf Course on rounty property at Mile Square earl; in Fountain Valley and the specifics art that course can provide sore generalized data rejarding probahle costs for a course in Huntington Reach. The David L. Baker Executive Course will he eighteen-holes on sixty-three acres. - It will he approximately 3,ono yards long. It: will include banquet facilities, a pro shop. locker room, maintenance and and driving range. The invest%,nt for American Golf is projected at 3 million to 3.5 million dollars. i• ' . HUNTINGTON CENTRAL r'1 Paige Two j EXECUTIVE GOLF COURSt ' Though an eighteen-hole course is preferable, American Golf Company feels 3 nine-hole executive or par three golf course with driving runile would be feasible. 'The 1981 llltrasystens report is not in agreement with American Golf. It indicated that a course would have to have a restaurant, bar and hotel to he profitable. That report estimated annual rent to the city of 515O,0O0 for an eighteen-hole qolf course with the associated complementary uses. i f POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE ASPECTS I f PROS GQNs 1. With Seacliff Golf Course now private, 1. A single recreational use would there is only one public coarse monopolize a large pnrtic,n of (Meadowlark Golf Course) the park. 2. A large, manicured, {green turf area 2. If problems such As arrant golf mould be aesthetically pleasing and ,'galls could not be mitigated in enhance the overall view of the nark, the design process, city would receive public complaints. 3. City would not have to pay for the development. 3. If carirse is on west side of park , a portion of the park 4. City would not nave to maintain currently used for equestrian that portion of the park. trails would have to be utilized. Trails could maintain the same 5. A course mould be revenue-generating length, but the area would he for the city (tM:adowlark Golf Course reduced from about forty-five paid the city over W 0,00O in acres to twenty-five acres. F Y 85/tit 1. 4. City owns only 189 of the 300 encyclopedia lots on the west side of the park. Estimated purchase price for the ill lots is $1 .57 million. 5. Part of the area on the east side or the park has county limitations requiring city to nay a portion of any revenue to the county. 6. Lights will have an impact on any surrounding resideirtial areas. CONCLUSION In conclusion, there ;,re points for and against devclopfnq a golf course in the park. Staff feels that sixty acres woula be an excessive amount of area for a single use; thirty acres Might be nare reasonable. The Huntington Ventral Park survey did not address the issue of a gnif course in the park, therefore, ai conclusion as to public demand cannot be rude at this time. If mitigating measures could be designed into a golf course, a nine-hole course with driving range might be a viable alternative for approximately thirty to forty acres in Huntington Central Park. 1 HUNTINGTON CENTRAL Psi �"� Page Throe EXECUTIVE GOLF COURSL Should City Council decide it wants to pursue the possibility of a golf course in the park, a feasibility and•design consultant who specializes in golf courses should be retained. Staff contacted the Southern California Golf Association's Director of Communications, Mr. Bob Thomas. Ile indicated that the assxfAtion does not provide such services, but he did recoewnd two possible consultants. Also, staff concurs with the Ctwwunity Services Cornilsslon's unanimous motion of February 11 . 1907: "The Community Services Commission supports a position of having r golf course viewed as a legitimate option for possible inclusion in Central Park. It urges the City Council to take no action on the golf course at the present time, but: would urge that it, along with other facilities in thA survey, he considered together. It is also recomnended that both the survey and the aol f course be referred to the Cornission in a tir.+oly manner for t, review and reccmirendation to City Council regarding the overall r prioritization of fac,ilitfes in Huntington Central Pdrk." MM1B/JBE:mb 2458e r a 3 i � i a Attachment 3 t leaCITY OF HUNTINGTON BNMMM INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To From Charles W. Thompson r, Bowman City Administrator I Director, Community Services SubJert Parking Meters in Parks pate May 19, 1987 Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed Councilman Bannister's letter of April 28, 1987, concerning narking meters being in- stalled in the parks. In summary: 1 ,468 parking spaces are available in Central Ptirk, Central. Library, community centers and Greer, Worthy and Marina Parks . Meter location maps are attached. - A twent -five cent per hour fee would generate approxi-- mately 165,000 annually; fifty cents per hour would be $330,000. - First year expense to the city would be approximately $455,000 (parking meters, vehicle , equipment and operating costa) . -- Second year coot $71 ,000. - At twenty-five cents per hour, the program would pay out at the end of the fourth year, realizing $94,001 over expenses. At fifty cents per hour, the payout would be at the end of tho second year with a gain of $259,000 annually. Parklijg Meter History •• The Community Services Commioaion recommended at its June, 1979, meeting, that the City Council look at alternative methods of financing, park maintenance. One alternative was to install. parking; meters in Huntington Central Park and at the community centers. At its meeting of November, 19T9, the City Council unanimously voted to entabliah a policy of no parking meters in any public parks . If you need additional information or input, please advise. MMB:cs 1 ,X f,. y F Attachment 4 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Dsts June S, 1987 Sub+alhtord zo: Honorable Mayor and City Council Svbtual Wby: Charles W. Thompson, City Administ r ' +sd by: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Services rO Uub*t: HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK MASRR PLAN 64 Ir Wf a s 4-46W44 . Con hWnt with Coundl Policy? roc) yes ( ) N4+�olky or Exc ptloa „Sop,♦ Qur+rwdt iw)j 4pA%&y ltrtrrt of law. R4wm t�lyds,Furiding Sourw, AltwnW"Aatk+ni,Attahments: � STATDENT' OF ISSUE There is a need to adopt a master plan for the undeveloped land and park facilities in Huntington Central Park utilitinq a general obligation bond to provide financing. KC06100AT I ON 0"ISSION RECMNOATIONS: t morION #l : Huntington Central Park to be primarily passive with open grass, tress, picnic, playground, garden and tare areas. Also, include in the master r Plan a swimming pool. Community center with gymnasiun, equestrian trail improvements, and Phase I iraproveownts to the existing Amphitheater. A $225,OOO,OM obligation bond will be presented to the voters as a vehicle to pay for this development. MOTION 42: Huntington Central Park master plan should include only Phase I of the amphitheater at a cost of 180,O00 and omit the botanical garden. STAFF REC0M;+IENDATION: MOTION 11 : A high percentage of the undeveloped areas of Huntington Central Park shoulld be developed in an open, passive Hay for the people who rant to stroll through the park And have picnics and family outings. Of the total number of acres available, 4 acres, or 3.1% could be used to provide other recreational outlets such as are available with an aquatic comple-,, community center and gymnnastwK. NATION O?: Staff also recommends that a major bond issue be developed to Rprovide all necessary funding for the full development of Huntington Central rArk. This NQuid include all elements of the finally adopted Master Plan. It IS further recommended, that the City Council direct staff to prepare and present a complete :analysis and comprehensive financial plan. r wear •IW.` y t�. 1 l 1 . 1 .iF REQUEST FOR CITY COOK ACTION June 5, 1987 •'HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PAr 4ASTER PLAN �� Page Two ANALYSIS ,I On July 12, 1986 and August. 18, 1986, City Council conducted Joint study sessions with the Community Services Comsission and staff. It was determined that a survey would be sent to Huntington reach residents through the water bill. In the interim, on February 17, 1907, City Council approved Phase I of the amphitheater at a cost of $214,000 and Phase I of the bandstand for $72,000. On March 2, 1987, the survey results were tabulated and City Council referred the survey and master plan to the Connunity Services Commission and staff for review and recommendation. There were 46,500 surveys distributed through the water bill , mobile homes, civic center and recreation, centers. Twenty-seven percent or 12,600 responses were sent back to the city. Overall , the public wanted the undeveloped sections of the park to be passive, open grass with picnic and playground areas. There was also interest demonstrated in some of the more active types of recreational facilities. Survey results are attached. The commission and staff' are in agreement with regard to creating an overall passive park with open grass, trees, picnic, playground, garden and lake areas. They are also in agreement that there should be a swimming pool , community center with gymnasium and equestrian trail improven_nts. while the Coemnmunity Services Commission does not recommend the botanical garden, staff feels a variety of garden environments could be included. Commission also feels that renovation in the amount of $80,OW for the amphitheater is satisfactory. Staff would like to seek ccw plete renovation and irmprovements totaling $660,000. Also, staff has included the bandstand, though the comission has opposed this facility's development in the park. Commmission and staff feel that a city of our size should have a complex with a swimming pool , gymnasium and recreation center. Huntington Beach is a beach city without adequate aquatic facilities to make residents "water safe." It is also felt that, with such a facility, the city can maximize its aquatic potential for, sinior citizens, adults, youth and the handicapped. The comaurmlmnity center with gyrnna:iu►m can meet a wide variety of recreation interests on a relatively small plot of land, It provides the iity with the opportunity to maximize the use of the park for the greatest amount. of people. Commission and staff are proposing using a portion of the disc goi ; course (approximately four acres) for the site. This will not impact the existing passive park or the undeveloped park acreage. The Commo0ty► Services Commission has not had an opportunity to respond to the childre n's library wing or improving Talbert Lake. The Library Oatrons Foundation, Library Board, Friends of the library and Friends of the Children's Library have expressed support for the children's wing. Talbert Lake is included due to the public comments about the lake itrying up each summer and the impact an the wildlife. . .1 1 1 t 1987 RN:QUGST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION � June 5,HUNT AGTON CENTRAL. r�MASTER PLA14 Page Three Facilities proposed for the park are delineated below: FACILITMS COWISSIUN STAFF Passive/Natural Area 9,740,003 s 9,740,000 (open space, picnic, play areas) Sully Miller Lake �350,000 t150,000 Swimming Pool 4,D00,000 4,000,000 Community Center with Gymnasium 6,000,000 5,000,000 Amphitheater 2,000,000 660,000 2,000,000 2,000,000,OUO Garden Huntington Lake 275,000 2750000 Bandstand -0 1751000 Equestrian 'Trail 500,000 500,000 Children's Literary fling - - 2,000,000 Talbc.rt Lake 1 ,000,000 Total $24,245,OQU b2i1,000,000 A portion of a major bond issue can be substantially offset by pledging manias from the Park ulucostion of the hondPtn�thet Fundo and Hunti Huntington tleacheresidents.• . thereby reducing the ct Comission and staff support the general ot)ligation bond to finance the Huntington ewillj Park rovideeaelopment. if comp iC concept lete an ly isand c o pehen sive financial plan. a bond issue, staffplan. P MING SOURCE General Obligation Bond ALTERMATIYE ACTIONS I . Separate the bond into several issues so that titre public can vote on specific facilities. 2. Do not develop the undeveloped portions of the park at this time. ATTACHMENTS HCP' Survey and Resul is WB:Mb 0706E/44-46 i I 5 VI. , 1 I ' Poll) HUNTrNGT(N CENTRAL f'% SIIRVEr RESULTS ACTIVI" NUMBER AND PERCENTAGES OF VOTES NO HIGH LOW HIGH NO RESPONSE LOW A NOO 1 . Passive/Natural 8 439 1 .940 10,379 707 1 ,474 2 647 Areas 6).25 15.41 82.6% 5.6% 11 .8% 21.0% 2. Picnic Area B,384 2.219 10.603 788 10169 3,007 66.8% 17.6% 84.4% 6.3% 9.3% 73.9% 3. Playground 6 416 3 106 9 S22 1 694 1 444 4 ?00 51.1% 20% 79.8% 10% l f.5S 3f.4% 4. Sully Miller 6.291 3 379 9 670 1 479 1 411 4 858 Fishing We 50.1% H.9% 71.0s. 11.6% li.2% 36.7% i S. Improvements 46.5% ZEN 79�4t. 16.0% H.6% 3f.95 6. Coomfifty/Aec S.617 3 283 8 900 2 291 1 369 5 674 ;enter 44.7% 29.ZZ 76.9% 1d.2% 16.9% 44.4% 7. Gardens al 4�1.33 2f.lZ MR 26.1% 16.5% 4).n t S. Major Aquatic 4,444 39365 70809 3.341 1 410. 6 706. Complex 35-.4Z 26.8% 62.2% 26.6Z lf.2% 51.4Z 9. fie ds11 29.2% 31.4% 61.6% 24.5% 12.9%521 W60 9% 10. Gymnasium 3,456 3.997 7 453 3,547 1 ,660 7,544 27.5Z 31.11% 56.3% 29.3% 12.4% 60.1% 11. Tennis 3,3SS 4,000 7,355 3,714 1 ,491. . 7-714 Complex 26.7% 31.8% 5B.5Z 29.6% 11.92 61.4S 12. Equestrian Trail 3,259 4 614 7,773 3,276 1,611 7 790 Improved i 26.0% 39.95 61.9% 26.1% 12.0% HAS Expanded i3, T'hemo-Type 3 206 3 791 60997 4.193 1,370 7 944 Restaurant 29.5% M.2% 55.71 33.4% 10.9$ Wilt 14. Japanese Teo 3.670 4.i96 6.680 3,073 10621 7,249 Carden Zl1.2% 2d.0% 53.2% 35.1% 11 .7% 63.19 lb. Football/Soccer 3 100 4 146 7 246 3,678 1 636 .7 824 Fields 24.7Z 35.0% 0.7% 79.3% 12.0% 62.3% 16. Racquetball 2 998 4 298 7.296 3,621 1 ,643 7 919 Courts A.9% 34.2% 58.1% 28.8% 13.1% 62.0% ` 17. Group 2 929 3 397 6 326 4 671 1 563 B 068 Campground 22.3% 2i.lz 56.4% 3f.2S H.4% 64.31, 18. Frisbee Calf 11811 4,221 6,032 4.743 1,786 8 964 Course 14.4% 33.6Z 48.0% 37.81 14.2% HAS 11+1.M,Mr+��"4u.,.w.I.M.7Trt t►/.Y' t f4TM.i+:7v? ?rye i'.. ....ti....i• .i c.. ... .. v. .•.., ..... �..a4'C .... , .ihL'..'.n`L':.G. ..-d!G TLcC.fc?i4M N4 .1�444MMT� I Ii t pu� CMTKAL PARK SURVEY t1*RMTS Tot► WKWK twyUM'T PRIORITY Can 0VXT N0. AR COlOIW S !. Leave the park as it la: (Passive) 10010 Z. Develop the park as planned. L61 3, Bike &W jogging trails. III 4. Pool needed 100 S. Coll Course 89 b. Appreciate harms &n oppot'tunity for input 68 7. No camping facili.tier; 85 S. Enough development &;:ready 78 s 9. Utvelop with na incrinne to rax payers 77 (user Fees) ( Ia. Ample parking for ne+ facilirir:a 69 11. tam not spend any sore ironer 50 12, Nev development for e•raryona, r10 special. interest 49 ' rl 777 :i ;t .: w.....-...... ..ten wwaN.#MKw�tww+w�.%x.�s1 _ . NR'L K3h�r�• r �,r Nt/+�s�alr+Nriw+or .'w iwarMci,l+�.,.�+v.4wr:Yl gyr+ral.r•r:.rvrc ' i �� NUNTIN NCUTUL P&RK .� 19106 Oear liunringtarr Beach WNW: Eelciosed Is A survey card prepared at thrr request of your City Council to allow you to provide Input. ieto how sire vaderaloped areas of Muntingtom Central earl. may be developed In future years. ledicata or, year card by checking the aplwopriate square the nimber of farmlly rakers and age groups your vote represonts. Select the recreational facslities you or ytur family would prater havlog fncorpechted Into Nuat(altran Central fart. You have ;j choice, of high, low and no priority (on priority being th,t ,yaw art totally�r rgainst the factiftyl. Space Is also pravldad for you to Indicate other suggested recreational Wilit4es or your yenerat comments. pltase +Helot* the com*leW clyd with ylwr M'rtor hill payment. Your prol'erences will be tabulates and %bo results forwarded to your City Council. if 'here are any questions regarding the •ivrrey. please contact Jim 0. Ingle at 536.5466. lbank you. Famlly Site (circle one): 1 7 J 1 5 6 7 • 1 10 Sour City Council lige Groups (indicate nudwr of family mowers): 6-5 yrs _6-12yrs _13-20 yrs _..21-75 yrs_15.56 yrs w,Gal up PRIORITYY l rrrrr, Hta" ? "F Maier Aquatic Gmplox Theft-type Restaurant %1"Sim Football/Soccer Fio1Js WI V/ reenter �4 J E rapanOid ._._ ...._ iq�aa�ee 104leanest �. .—.. Rgsre actrral7 Courts •...._. Belarllltatl Rardens .�.. Flares Aron .�.. �fem Golf course fellrr Miller f shlag Lake ►iyrgrwrsr. ..... -.-- Pastlrv/Iit}tv:•a1 Atws ._... _., _... EerrprwM —""" off strew'( Jorpraraertrtts Niantfol(, etc. to Improve part:/street side sessheticsl � C#►nits: " SEIM $WYEY 11143 WATER BILL FA1WKT " Q7l11EII ► .wr-w.�w+;rMi►w+mar......r-.wv�l+rtv.innarar�rt�r�u/ul-r...[N'/r.I4w _�t.jh:ti.:i!"•.(ItY .1Y1V1.1�s�riYYV'Its[IMF/ri\pi.[41n'.I.,yl..nyM...irw..�....r..-........�.-r^. 77711 . 1 i Attachment b BONTIM(MW CENTRAL PARK TOrAL ACRaws 216.5 acres Developed 163 acres Und.vee.loriea 5 acres Master planning now 125.0 acres Mushroom Farm 'fatal 380.0 acres UnDavaLiOvED Ackyog MAT Ofa OOLDOWST 16.0 acres M'sst of Goldenwest at Talbert 16.0 acres open Space/Picnic Area ilert of col, enwest. North of Ellis 57•5 aCC4i O.,n Apace/Equestrian Trails, Picnic 55.0 nerce and PUY Areas Parking - Lot off Bllia/170 spaces Z.5 acres lfB+f"! OP QKW.dBMNRit r 'calks rt 43.5 acres Bart of Goldenwest nieUand clay Area 29.0 acres Ogren Spa parking - Lot off Talbert/75 spaces 1•U acres Lot 011 Gothard/150 RpaCts 11.0 Acres o.C. Transfer Statiot, ez 11 .5 artrOr Xi st of Goldenwest. North of Ellis acres Sully Miller Lako - Water Area f•g.5 acres -- Land Area VOtxl ©adewelo Y Ar.reage Currently Being Itaatur Planned* i�.5 ae�sits "NOTE: Mushroom Firm (25 4cre n) in; not ;nclude:d in the figure above because, it in neat teeing toaster planned at this tiff e. ' -+.....+..•..ea*rfrr�•+iMwt+saw..,.n+.*r...+.... n.c�,••.....,..�s.r...rrmvwcaur+'s'fMi�Mi/+I,�16'K1�i1��'/l�l�+il�iM����r,.`-t °•r' 1 ra f a ). s�i 1t ,a r•vA� �. �• Zi r 'X BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO AGE. AND CONDITION 0IF40RIGINAL DOCUMENTS t; Ar Wr t f•� •tl .i , . .. � ram. .. f: At t'6 ' •, • .r Lam' ..• � •. . l cMN LOT r •, ; SA PAQVMM s wt COT • • M Aam t • Sara 1I1Ii00 • wvww V AMA ♦ + • � ��1111� i \. w bA '1' w �OPr�1 jwmx . ALT~T"u . w 4 F• r w i w. .i t� • • •1. zj AC B!W/ 1 ro CENTRALPARK MASTERPLAN •Y OF HUNTINGT ON BEAN ».,.._.._......--.-....r-....«+...,,•w ..,::,i`,fJ:•>d'..".1.:'�,, ;;.....,.�att,r;.•.. .. � .... .ter.. ..� ...n. As.. � .i �.. � �1.�n' i� `b Nal Tl rl'c.P � REt�UE�' FAR CITY CoU ACTION January 30, 1987 Darts APPROVED RY CITY COUNCIL Submlttad to: The Honorable Mayor and City Council nn 19�..... PAmOtad by: Charles V. Thompson, City Admi ni strartor`�. CITY C Prapera�d by: Mel vin M. Bowman, Directors Community Se rvi sub)t: GEKRAL KVEi OPWNT KAN FOR AW"11KATER, fMIDSTAND Co nkmi with Council Paoli y�ArF10U j IMMFhNITIM�Y v Poi�icy orrExaption Stat"Wt of I", RaavmrnWKWon,Analysis, Funding Source,Ahwnstive Aatiaw,Antachmenfi: LTAT 1B= 0tr ISSUE There is a nm!ed to facilitate performing arts programs within the city. Huntington Control Paris (HCP) has been suggested as a potential site for the development of three separate facilities. IIECdREII !ION Staff recowrier,de: 1. Approve Ph1hse I renovation and expansion of the HCP amphitheater for use AS a porfoming arts facility at a cost of $80,000 plus a 15% contingency, Include the pro3ect in the Capital improvement Projects (CIP)budget as unfunded and submit for Council review as part of the CIP budget process for 1987/88. 2. Approve Phase i construction of a bandstand facility in HCP at a cost of s62,000 plus a 15% contingency. Include this project in the CIP bud"t as unfunded and submit for Council review as part of the CIP budget prostss for 1987/88. 3. Approve consultant recomdaendation against the devel opea'nt of an indoor playhouse theater in W.P. The Allied Arts' Soard recommiends: 1 . Approve staff's rte mrendatfon for Phase I renovation and expansion of HCP amphitheater with the inclusion of lighting. Tye revised estimated cos of Pha e i 'td b Od plus co in cx.ti SIL O „ fife) -ar ff's recomendations to construct a bandttand #acil itY in NCP aft t estimated cost of S62,000 plus contingency. J. staff's reeommAdation against the development of an indoor playhouse , tiw�ter in NCP. ow.M4 t `�{�.�� tr'^pIiOCYT.iY'.Y1:►IIa7NCun l+rtYw.•. ....... ..............n..�>.�.,.ww.«R�Kl�t wc.Il4Mt'cw.rrrw..�f.....�+....r+....ww -- • + ,rrl t �'V .r r i• REQUEST FOR CITY COUNr) ACTION -''� Page Two GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PL►.a FOR AMPHITHEATER, BANDSTAND AND PLAYHOUSE IN HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK Community Services Commission recommends: 1. Approve staff's recommendation to renovate and expand the HCP amphitheater. 2. Disapprove staff's recommendation to construct a bandstand facility in HCP. 3. Approve staff's recommendation against the development of an indoor playhouse theater in HCl'. ANALYSIS On December 2. 19850 City Council directed staff to go out to bid for a consultant to analyze the city's performing arts needs with regard to an amphitheater and a possible location for the Huntington Beach Playhouse within HCP. Ron Yeo, FAIR Architect. Inc.. was approved on May 5, 1986, as the consultant. Ron Yeo and Associates recommended (Exhibit 3) the renovation of the existing amphitheater for a performing arts facility with an emphasis placed on summer theater. The facility would be available to other performing artists and the community during the off-season (Septemmmber - May). Yeo further identified a need for a concert bandstand in HCP to accommodate the very popular concert in the park pro roan which would showcase the Huntington Beach Concert Rand as well as invited art sts. The consultant recommended against the development of an indoor theater to accommodate the Huntington Beach playhouse and suggested the joint-use of the 4 Main Street Library property as an alternative site. Currently. the Huntington Reach Playhouse rehearses at the Main Street Library and performs at Gisler School . In concurrence with the findings and recommmendations made by Yeo. staff proposes the Incremental envelopment (expansion and renovation) of the existing amphitheater site as a mrultiple-use, outdoor performing arts facility to accommodate a professional summer theater program. Staff also concurs with the consultant; as to the need for a concert bandstand facility and than HCP is an appropriate location. Furthermore, staff agrees with Yea that alternative sites should be considered for the location of an indoor theater facility. Estimated costs for the development of the amphitheater and bandstand are outlined in Exhibits 4 and S. The Allied Arts Board reviewed Yea's report and staff's recommendation. The Board i concurs with staff's recommendations regarding the de-velop+aent of the bandstand and its location. The Allied Arts Board was also in agreement with the consultant and staff regarding an alternative site for an indoor theater to accommodate the Huntington Beach Playhouse. It was suggested that a location downtown would i address the need for an indoor performing arts facility and act as a catalyst to attract residents and visitors to the area. The Allied Arts Board find appointed subcommittee concur.-with staff recoramaendation regarding the incremental development of the amphitheater with the following alterations: (Exhibit 6) 1. Incorporate lighting of the theater arena and pathways in Phase 1. The Board felt that in order to facilitate evening performances, attract professional groups and a theater company, lighting is a crucial element and should be incorporated into Phase I. ...... __. . ----.-...... ....,.., ,........n. _____ ..,_. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNem*)ACTION /'11.1 page Three GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLIA FOR AMPHITHEATER, BANDSTAND AND PLAYHOUSE IN HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK i i 2. Incorporate the backstage from Phase III into Phase I1. 3. Incorporate dressing room facilities with the backstage area. 4. Scale down the size and costs of the ticket booth and concessions. 5. Incorporate theatrical lighting equipment into final phase. with these alterations, the Allied Arts Board, in accordance with City Council 's request for a ten-year cultural plan, requests Council accept Board and staff recanr+endations. . The Community Services Comrission and appointed subcommittee reviewed staff recommendations for performing arts facilities in HCP. While the Commissioners were understanding of the need for lighting to accommodate evening programs and { attract professional groups, the Commission approved staff recommendations +} providing the lighting 1n Phase 11. The Commission voted to approve the subcommittee's recommendation for the , construction of a' bandstand in the City of Huntington Beach. However, while the Commission was supportive of the summer concert series proaraat, a motion to locate the bandstand in MCP did not pass. Throughout the review process of both of these projects, discussion included the need to encourage a partnership approach to financing these projects. Staff has recaamnded the establishment of a performing Arts foundation to draw support from corporate contributors and local businesses. While the concerts in the park Accom dated at the bandstand facility would be free to the public, the sun r theater program, facilitated at the amphitheater would be revenue ger•erating. The estimated total cost of the amphitheater would be $60g,000. The estimated total cost of the bandstand construction would be $160,000. A 15% contingency �} would be added to these estimates if approved. FMINS SOME General Fund Perk Acquisition and Development Fund Foundation grants Private Contributions ALTEIINAME ACTIONS 11 i 1. Provide electrical per source into amphitheater at an esatiriated cost of Iy $8,000. Provide portable lighting to accommodate evening performances for the first season at an estimated cost of $15,O00. rs 2. Consider a downtown plaza location for the bandstand facility. i' 1 ' " aYiWkCM: :.♦G.!!Ll}'ypeu...,SCi',,,:..h .�f►',wla+•,•.s.U •.•...•.,.�._,...... .. n.;•..a�l_.a. ..:2:97.'."t•.7,�11 .--"l':�OYa1iM.�J•+frw M.•.yr.rM'gr�t.w+rwti.w�.wl.IiVu�MMh. w.A�,w�ra �:�1y • .1 i t REQUEST FOR CITY COUN`)ACTION Page Four GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLRO FOR AMPHITHEATER, BANDSTAND AND PLAYHOUSE IN HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK ExHielTs 1 ) Nap of area 2) site location 3) Ran Yea's report 4) Community Services Department recommendation-amphitheater renovation and expansion 5) Community Services Department recommendation-bandstand 6) Allied Arts Board recowwndation-amphitheater renovation and expansion NIA/W:mb 070GE/34-37 I I i k 9�'"'Pro....».n +►K�il+la se.�ehw..swv we+.r..•••••«..... ..+.�.w.ay.,nrrw'+uMu.tl+>I'rt'1':I1Yt.oNiY];1fMi�'tfnnN,w,e.i.+,.,../n,M,.�1rr�r�n,.lyrwyM� 1 r 1 1�- ,''� REQUE FOR CITY COUNCro-NACION January 301 1987 Mee The Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles K. Thompson, City Administrator�'•�� P►gwedby: Melvin M. Bowman, Director,, Comsunity Servic subjW: GENERAL DEVELOFWNT PLAN FOR NWHI71iEATER, SAWSTAND AND PLAYHOU E IN K NTINCT_Qi�,CENTRAL PARK comistont with Council Polley? S( ) Yas V-1 lvew Poliay or Exception Sutannentof laws, Recomnnendatian,Analysis, Funding Sourae, Alt~lw Actkm.Attachments: STATWNT dF ISSUE There is a need to facilitate performing arts programs within the city. Huntington Central Park (HCP) has been suggested as a potential site for the developwnt of three separate facilities. RECOWNGATION Staff recommends: I. Approve Phase. I renovation and expansion of the HCP an hitheater for u rformi s facilit at a cost of $800000 plus P. M, contingency. At u e pro ect n ded and submit for Council review as part of the CIP budget process for 1967/88. 2. Approve Phase I construction of a bandstand facility in HCP at a cost of $6; ON plus a 16% contingency. Include this project in the CIP budget as unfunded and submit for Council review r,s part of the CIP budget process for i98y/68. 3. Approve consultant recommendation against the development of an indoor playhouse theater in HCP. The Allied Arts Hoard recommends: 1. Approve ltaff's recon ondrtien for Phase I renovation and expansion of HCP amphitheater with the inclusion of lighting. The revised estimated cost of Phose I would be $196,0W plus contingency. ..n. N. Approve staff'.s recoswndations to construct a bandstand facility in HCP at this,, WIVAted cost of W,000 plus contingency. 3. Approve staff',A recaeeoandation agaf nst the development of an indoor playhoutt. tWater in W. ' AhRMIv./tM1i `. �4M.Li11:Yi :.P+•:L:T.:?j 1 r : 4%fit;: ' ",.f: i.. i ..,iavarfif�ki 1 1 / REQUEST FOR CITY CDUN�#")ACTION to,*� Page Two GENERAL bEYELOPMENT PL. FOR AMPHITHEATER, BANDSTAND AND PLAYHOUSE IN HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK Comunity Services CoewmisEion recommends: 1 . Approve staff s recommendation to renovate and expend the HCP amphitheater. 2. Disapprove staffs recommendation to construct a bandstand facility in HCP. S. Approve staff's recommendation against the development of an indoor playhouse theater in HCP. ANALYSIS An December 2, 1986, City Council directed staff to go out to bid for a consultant to analyze the city's performing arts needs with regard to an amphitheater and a possible location for the Huntington Beach Playhouse within HCP. Ron Yeo, FAIR Architect, Inc. , was approved on May S, 1986, as the consultant. Ron Yeo and Associates recommended (Exhibit 3) the renovation of the existing amphitheater for a performing arts facility with an emphasis placed on summer theater. The facility would be available to other performing artists and the community during the off-season (Septt*or - May). Yeo further identified a need for a concert bandstand in HCP to accommrodate the very popular concert in the park pro ra+m which would showcase the Huntington Beach Concert band as well as invited art�sts. The consultant recommended against the development of an indoor theater to accommodate the Huntington Beach Playhouse and suggested the joint-use of the Main Street Library property as an alternative site. Currently, the Huntington Reach Playhouse rehearses at the Main Street Library and performs at Gisler School. In concurrence with the findings and recommendations rude by Yeo, staff proposes the incremental development (expansion and renovation) of the existing amphitheater site as a multiple-use, outdoor performing arts facility to accommodate a professional summer theater program. Staff also concurs with the consultant as to the need for a concert bandstand facility and that HCP is an appropriate location. Furthermore, staff agrees with Yeo that alternative sites should he considered for the location of an indoor theater facility. Estimated costs for the development of the amphitheater and bandstand are outlined in Exhibits A and 5. The Allied Ants Board reviewed Yeo's report and staff's recommendation. The Board concurs with staff's recommendations regarding the development of the bandstand and its•location. The Allied Arts Board rias also in agreement with the consultant and staff regarding an alternative site for an indoor theater to accommodate the Huntington Beach Playhouse. It was suggested that a location downtown would address the need for an indoor performing arts facility and act as a catalyst to Attract residents and visitors to the area. The Allied Arts Board and appointed subcixaaittee concur with staff recoa endaiion regarding the fncreweental development of the amphitheater with the following alterations: (Exhibit D) 1 . Incorporate lighting of the theater arena and pathways in Phase 1. The Board felt that in order to facilitate evening performances, attract professional groups and a theater company, lighting is a crucial element and should be incorporated into phase I. :MNc+,pyrvc'i..rw`:,4tr'4'" G '7i:G.,'lit . ..1v:t'... .,..... .. . ,..• t7, ,.;.1 " -REQUEST FOR CITY COW") ACTION 1110*1N page Three GENERAL OEVEL.OP1ENT F"W FOR AMPHITHEATER, BANDSTAND AND PLAYHOUSE IN HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK 2. Incorporate the backstage from Phase III into Phase Ii. 1 3. Incorporate dressing roam facilities with the backstage area. 1 d. Scale down the site and costs of the ticket booth and concessions. S. Incorporate theatrical lighting equipment into final phase. With these alterations, the Allied Arts Board, in accordance with City Council 's request for a ten-year cultural plan. requests Council accept board and staff recommendations. The Community Services Commission and appointed suhcomnittee reviewed ,taff recommendations for performing arts facilities in MCP. While the Commissioners were understanding of the need for lighting to accommodate evening program'i and attract professional groups, the Commission approved staff recommendations providing the lighting In Phase 11. The Commission voted to approve the subcommittee's recommendation far the construction of a bandstand in the City of Huntington Beech. However, while the i Commission was supportive of the swwr concert series program, a motion to locate t1,* bandstand in HCP did not pass. Throughout the review process of both or these projects, discussion included the need to encourage a partnership approach to financing these projects. Staff has recommet,*1 the establishment of a performing arts foundation to draw support from corporate contributors and local businesses. While the concerts in the park accomwc+dsted at the bandstand facility would be free to the public, the summer theater program, facilitated at the amphitheater would be revenue generating. The estimated total cost of the amphitheater would he $609,000. The estimated total cost of the bandstand construction would be $1600000. A 16% contingency +, would he added to these estimates if approved. F'IMpING SOURCE ►��y General Fund' Pane kquisition and Developm.nt Fund Foundation Grants Private Cootwihutions ti ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS r tt4 1. Provide electrical power source into amphitheater at an estimated cost of f M.W0. Provide portable lighting to accommodate evening performances for the ' first season at an estimated cost of S15j000. ' ( o g. Consider a downtown plaza location for the bandstand facility. is 5 -• w••• --�•wcswwryP�i}'+f Y1J.WJ' nl..Irtl•w r+f v.r-wry� , i , 1. GEBEQUEST FOR CITY CDUMf�ACTION Pace Pour NERAL DEVELOPMENT PL. . FOR AIPHITHEATERo BANDSTAND AND PLAIOUSE IN HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK MINITS 1) Map of area Z) Site location 31 Ron Yea's report 4) Cmwnity Services Department rewwndation-amphitheater renovation and expansion 5) CoOmnity Services Department recommndation-bandstand d) A111ed Arts Board reca undation-amphitheater renovation and expansion MM9/M":mb I Vf I �+�wwr�.wMwYWa{�li?�MIf1�11i ,-y'f'�5 V 1 I 3 MIPIMiJ+MM+yfffAW+•C'?M e.v["�hi1:1F' r ,.f i „ r' Ht't'FIF�`�C6p71�tS'.I�lii��it+�'.wl�it'b7r *;rSJJt,, _ y r.l 1 p► EGEI � � • 1 i 01TV OF H1, NTvMTON MOH ula INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUMICATION / JAN O 9 196Y CM OF HUNTINGTON MACH a ADMINISTRATIVE MA To Charles W. Thompson Fr ax Bowman City Administrator Director. Community Services Subject Consultant Report on Amphitheater Date January 8, 1987 The consultant and staff rep.ut on the HCP amphitheater, bandstand and playhouse proposal for Central Park will have been reviewed by the Allied Arts Board and Community Services Commission aii of January IA, 1987. Please advise If you want me to transmit the Consultant/staff/board/commission recommendations through the RCA process as an administrative item or at a study session. We would be prepared to make a presentation on this matter on February 17 prior to the Council meeting. It a study session is held , we would like to request that the Allied Arts Board be invited. MMB:cs cc: Michael Mudd, Cultural Affairs Manager vc.. ,.a..,;[-. C. ,. ,. _t ., , i.;.j. ...., ..i..— .._. . .. ... ,.� ,..- 1i2 is✓J1...C"�i'iR'CS BEST r�HOTOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO AGE AID CONDITION OE OR.IGIN.AJ..f DOCUMENTS i�- 1(rl`t+rl, t{ d�� l3�iKk)s :.r' 'r►iF {wttif ,if �FEAi ' i /� � ��M.tyrle l;Nn ���Rn. :'aR'h+-r n+�...«.� •VIICft[a"'C b'�G�� +tip"a��{• ti�;X� r -a fr, f r EXHIBIT 1 AMPHITHEATER �' a �.i'w .. ..1"•�?- :;,. CONCERT BANDSTAND ' `. �: ��'• 1 :' , t ( • �,/ ■ V• �' • t .►,r �l�,; ���'•. -• ' .' �..r.. r. :� �J� � Ire !,�rc�tic... ;asrr, _•� .;�'r We ` •''�if ow • •� w w •' ��'� '--� ,�?` tit Rim I • : may.-..,•., r,. . ..�. • � •".v� _ f' !iSAA16 ._ - ;; �y-Mi�:r�:�:. .•. ._ ter-:�'� fs PROP 81D CEMPAL PARKMAS' TFJWIAN CM OF HUNTMTM EEACH 'JULY 19" pl►Y.1tts.wtl.:�atYi..V•.va ra,C•. ,. .... ,i,. .: rr .. a .+. lti�'F{SA•'l1KC!!l�A�phtq BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC� REPRODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO AGE AND CONDITION OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS 1 lv - • • + 1 • � �„ s�",�• � 1 J�j yr ! f$� r ���� is •�` *'1 l 1 ♦ y . _ - � 4. 1i .f � ,�1., Ord,mil...�' �,/,+•.r •r, -�.r IOL Pei Ill" �`• } �, e db1,1�� Fdb • 6 IL lk JAI -ore ;dOr Y * 1 + Al, � � -ML- slim r � l ��r:PY�4MfY:.., ..ra.,+•.Fu tr�n�:•rTM.Hr�.+Ns- ^t..i.�•.. �a��rr h.Y•7:te 1�'., .... .. Dili,'::'S".f.l•'azr�;eaa vSrtita.N YC:� �':ca:�i:nRIf��r��l�'Ra'i4F�i0FPA� • �^� 8�i4I�iT 3 � rr M r �p et A►i► "1� Ilk a A r. N n yr r too �A fA _ EMWTM SMARY r Awfacmiag Arts in the Pwk would be an asset end should be encoeraged. Rather than expend the ezisting Amphitheater to accoasdate all of the needs of ! :srlous groups - it In recommended that two separate facilities be developed. 1. bandstand - on the open lama. 2. Fciatin d■pbltbenter - improve for dance, theater and smell groups. Etp1we the possibflitl of joint use of the Main Street Library to accaasadate the NuatiW-Oa Heacb playboave. In order to keep capital expenditures down, the key concept is to provide the !pp minions amomt of elements to make each group successful. f Ome the program are establinbed, additioeal improvements can be implemented as euthusiamm and demand grows. -1 w r AUl8MMTIOof This stall was aut1wrized on Nay S' 1986 by the City 'r-auncil. c PLWFQ6S G The purpose of this :study in to ----iadf the opportunities and constraints of the Csstral Park situ is ardor to xax1nize the Performing nrtz experience within the Park. Tin resullLiilg 6ea±+:al Developseat P1w for the Perforsdag Arta will prove Guidelines for Detw:!ga bevalopmat and detailed Construction Documents prior to implementation. FRMOUS 6TUDUS 'The Central Park Master Plan (Carlo", Dilallc, Harrington) is currently going through the approval proccas. The expansion of the Amphitheater is consistent with the recomemistioas of the following reports, M171i7sR'ttt/tt/ll�iRc OhOh ottivat Incorporate enlargement of existing aaphithaster(wilt he 120 Wae�:T and csorlisate effects,with architectrral tosaultant •:plorloff tassfbSliq sir bsl23tas a>tlarls+us,. At tbie polat In the aassarrls■ atuy. Lt is fait tbet cbe la`acc of as, azlecsed arpiic.aatar aeold sacaaalt.te AS evarell 2e-saslraiLos of 110 current paeeattta:.cA v hicatac dcarlattes■7staos sear t►e 11kcar7. As fair w On ploraaass. ti.are Is the grestlea of asprepriateseaa vlthin .� iso:rsl farts lc is, lbe cx,-rect tocaaasaNz.ae s[ Cesdesa-LAU21a-uactiaiten and site Csasus,itf Services staff that as, slsswte size to not reaaflr a asatLahS so esppera earn needs of tha yarly%ortal fapllitiva. Its direct access, Stow a major attecial ass aafficiast remis& dtbar it a etrrccars or lee tali ■llarstsas. The 1985 Annual Report of the Huntington Beach Allied Arts Board includes a r "Fen Your Plan". A. 20W hm Aewh(LA IK 5 As adsaft owsdsor an g iifhasora to Cesare:Pwk a w be uWaded is peodde r sadtsad warn for Joad perisnows and teurhft /wma, Sasies 114 sad areas as deacs.3newmanne l & decal Pt�lfafs�ant,:furor 8atx m pd1 tacMr �+Nflslls Or seat win,Is CatM"&&I Mire gorand■ M for s k%W pfNataiaas Censer!w tM Acts. CkwoocA iwu the jwlurailas co"no nicy,ow eaeernblr of a *ndocalon 'teswo and she &Whft of *a cicrsa rgptat M emt asd Should Loeb Oienie/3oadhr to seam *At the = Crew far lie Ants Is W*udihad and swparted ewrs it is bust As,amf MOMWIsasIdealtMA Car tineettotp. 7Zse Visual Arts Center Report (Ann 17sorne — Arts Coordinator) • _wi i - , MAUSI5 OF THE PP.@FOlt M ARTS FACILITIES IN HUNTING` rt BF,M:H t BACIGROM: i The key group is the city is the Allied Arts Board. lta stated purpose is to "guide. encourage. and ! promote cultural activitiea and events in the city," including recommendations to the City Council { an budgets and facilities. It is clear that there is an accelerated gr--wth in the Cityms interest in supporting the arts. Fortunately, rt±a-e are s ;1 gro,;Ys s.Ka 1=ve existed for a number of years which are well place-d co take advantage of this support and can therefore provide the city with perfarmtiances-of good quality which ;rill bring even more popular support. In our research, however. it became quite clear that these groups are very fragwented and have relatively weak associations with the city. Indeed, city support has been slight itself. 4 particular ly wlmen you compare it with other cities of sirallar size in the county. The Allied Arts Board has recognized this fact with one of its strongest reconraendations, that of creating immediately the position of a full-time arts coordinator. We strongly applaud this "rove on the part ' of the city, which will be completed this s- moer. This will tend to give an important voice to the arts in Huntington Beach where it is needed the most -- in the city government. The Allied Arts Board seen a large "Center for hots" sane years down the toed. The upgrading of the Central Park amphitheater and a building to house the interim Center for the Arts are seen as steps toward this ambitious goal. This is a prudent plan and its success hinges on the strategy developed at.the present time and that is the thrust of this report. = THE CIVIC PERFOliKM ARTS GRMS 1K RMIPGPOK BEM31 COP i We can identify the following performing arts groups: a) The Huntington Beach Concert Band - t b) The Huntington Beach Playhouse (community theatre) c) Various dance companies throughout the City d) Proposed summer theatre group (Golden West affiliation) Thrum groups hem more differences the similarities due to the nature of their craft and this fact alosae ssltes it eEstrelrifficwlt to aatisf' ell of their needs ,n any one facility, let alone a very specialised sad limited one an propaeed by the Allied Arts Hoard, that is, the upgrading of the Central Parr anphitheeter. by examining them groups and heir individual. needs we can clearly see he challc=3M. - A) M HIWIMCM BEMM CINCERT BAND Thin le a very -old established group that has more of a following outside the city than in it, due in large nessnre to the lack of a suitable city facility. Financial support by the city has not a been significant until recently. The present City Council has recognized the value of supporting �--j this type of group. In our opinion this is a major performing arts group that the city is fortunate to have available. We feel that'if a Suitable how could be found for its group it would he an instant popular success and; tend to i.wreaae the support for all performing arts groups in the city, r as well as increasing civic pride. However, this group has very spa=ialized news. They include: r 1. Room an stage for sixty ple7ers, plus their stands and instruments. d x 2. Risers arranged in three tiers. 4 3. Sound- sbell to direct the music- toward• the audience. 4. Lights for reading the- score s.ed. to we she bond at night. 5. Very large-and- open grmmy area for s large- audience to gather together, picnic. and to sit and 1 listen. It is anticipated that these concerts would- be free to the public. 6.- Public address system to announce selections. It can, readily be seen that the ses11 amphithaatser- in the park is not suitable for this group, nor could'it be- rinetvated to fit, the requirements within a reasonable budget in our opinion. The SsgMthestr+e is suitable for sell quartets and the like that may be put together from the concert head: Of course, other estobliibed sa1e21 musical groups could also be invited in to play in the amphithmter. C) • .. - - - -- `.:'mac.-"' __ -� .- �_ � - _. - i • a Iham i1U 1 ' hrG= WACK RAYMM ( Comsvmity`lbeatre is an important force In brintiag people together in a city. Usstally there in a pis of ysmog and old callege educated and self educated. those who lore theatre and those who love tamers work send this diversity can crests astonjoUng vitality an both sides of the curtain. The "ct�tsdty" in t:ommsaity theatre is so idle title and theme whc participate have a very strong iisntffication with their city. For this rempoe every municipality should encourage community tNemLzta. y The Hmtington Desch Playhouse to another civic group that is surprisingly strong and healthy. and which-Me existed-for over two decades. It is small but well supported. with a long standing selling lint and sWpificant fuvAs is the book. Its snuffesee tends to be older people who patronize this theatre for its fetsily t. This group is comfortable with its thrust stage and two hssird seats. la our apinies thav is no possibility that the bmtingtoa Beech Comimmity Theatre could utilize the park a■�4ttltrrtre. Tbeir work is strictly as indoors type of performance wtsich carries over ehoeW OWo.c the year sad would be ill suited eo the restrictions necessary at the park. Q 1IOM COWAYM Ile THE CM At the caatety: level, dance companies tend to be DIM gypsies, they travel from place to place ptrfo mein-Amour they can. No dents group is the county has its own home and the beast that can be F done for dam" in ftatington Beach is to provide a stage in a suitable location. The amphitheatre stage would be a possible solution if provided with a commercial dance floor of plastic that would be put dawn over a layer of smsooite, whuich in turn would cover the present vood planks. This would cnad en and smooth the surface. This would not provide a very large stage but it could are useful nevertheless for s small, number of dancers. i Anor ar requitement for dance is side-lighting. This could be provided at the amphitheater satisfactorily. D) PhiQd'i M SUN= THEAM 1 This is the osly V=p that is not presently active. Indeed, it would be a newgroup expressly faiwad`to provide thestre. during the summers is time park amphitheatre. Fortunately, the community } of &ich1isms at Golden Hest all of the requirements necessary to provide a first rate tLeftkI C-3 season for the s�pbft:.eeter. " ' Cans* West faculty and staff are ready sad milli" to provide box office, shop space, costumes. ligbt3ag lastrumests, public relations, directors. actors, etc. for this enterprise. They Would do two cc three light cawsdy/slag plays wbic6 over a period of a south during the summer would run f3 10 or 12 aigbta sacb. Tichat prices would be around p6.W with student aad aeoior citizen dimmest*. Crmq salsa wm1d also be discounted. Sets. saskisg pieces mod props would be constructed as svgaired each ■r% er. Dressing and sake-up -t would l.ikawiss be constructed or rental teats would be utilized as needed. Vith the proper istility, this venture bus an excellent chance to be very successful. Theatre out of doors has prom to be popular across the nstioa, and the Costral Park setting is ideal for this ik awmyed a awabier of sites for the amphitheater in tba Park. Thu ambience of the present #; l+ocatias, coupled with the lacer costs of usdft the present stage and seating, made this site our first ch"Ce. 1 FAST C,IMM rlI PATIQ "A" We recea 1 that the Concert bead be provided with a concrete bandstand in area "b" Korth of the library and now the lake, facing amt. Thin bamlvtwW should be in a tiered configuration and provide a1I of the apace necessary for the bane to play and be ,sea. Because of the need to blend this unit into its site, so storage can he pro-rfded within the stage itself, but fiend, dry areas can be prarided behind the structure for temporary storage of instrument cases, etc. This bandstand ahowld be designed solely for the Concert Band sand its unique needs, although other groups, such as choroses and the like would also flad It useful. Electrical outlets would be provided for stand ligbts, so that the musicians could resd their scores evad.ly.. In addition, two tall polam with floods would be provided so that the band could be seer,. Two spots would 'ba provided t, hfohigbt the solist. Qmtorols For these lights would be located on or viboat the bandstand so they cQald easily be na*J. Speaker conduits would be provided for public address. Until's fiaisbed systm was provided, a borrowed portable lectures night be used, with a built-in sound systan. A smsikr of folding chairs would be provided with a rolling cart for those elderly who need to sit Is.-a Chef:, instead of on the ;rasa. ! A portable acoustic shall would be provided that would be erected each time the band is to pe:rfor+a. Ibia cm be a stock unit -- often referred to as to "Wager" -- after its manufacturer, one of the largest in the nation. - Parts of the sh*U ccaYd be need for amm Ue.r singing groups performing at the .bandetand or at the smodt eatrar. The folding seats will also be used for additional stating at the lather facility. InQlbnfll►'i1rn ..DK ' To sigpe rt the dosce garoupo and the proposed s utsmrzr theatre group, we recommend that the Central Park A phithestre be re*stovA to its origins) state, minus the filled-in concrete firepit at dcrmrsi rigUt: Aisle lights should be added to the circuits already provided end these circuits is tart abo uM be brougbt up to spsca.ficatlooe. In the place of the firepit the stage should be extended. Other u1nor additions to :fie stoat, m*s required by Golden fit, such as access steps on stsgae lefty., alarm need to be carried out. The seating is uncomfortable for performances as long au a play requires, so wooden seat backs must be provided. - Seat cushions can be rented at each perfornance or the audience can be encouraged to t bring, .heir own. ' ire note diet the city has recently repaired the stage and seat:•ng to a large extent and in o►ir opiates the matters love done an excellent job. We recommend that the city crews be given tLe task of a cosplete restorst:ion of both audience aW stage areas because we feel the work will be of a higber gdal.ity. `--� In addition* we recommend that a complete theatri^al lighting pet-up be provided, including 48 dimmers, poles- for mounting lighting instruments and remote controls. The diameters would be housed on site, ,agile the remote controls vold be brou:Sht in each sumer out of storage. For dance recitals a reeiient floor: of rubberized plastic material has to be prodded that could be laid down when necessary. The stage must be first layered with assonite. This would Have to be I rena+red each answer. ' Flualxy, secmity is the fora of a restal fence and a caretaker during the run of the shows would be required to protect both the laveseat of the City end that of Golden hest. " " 1 It aimould bo noted that these 3amgrcovlaestts do not affect the amphitheater'a use as a wedding 4 Iacatiaa or- far ouch daytime activities as Doj Scout lectures, is fact, these and other informal. activitiee would be embaaced. It can-be sees that trecommeeistiam A and b,provide the m1almm:s of what is necessary in order for the down. theatre mW misic pesformswcas To be sag;Mefnl. Without success right at the beginning. the performing warts movement ±a the City will Lae momsatum. by providing a no-coepro dse bandstand for the concert band and a no-compromise lightiag installation for the dance and theatre people we ;tt can help imwrs that Mcceam. y1 Necessary nod desirable expeasion and refiaaments cam cnver. to future phases. w i r 1 --61 U TM C s' In order Cot this two facilities to relate to each other properly and effectively utilize the restroa■s at the amp+Idthsstre, lights must be placed along the southern path leading from the c library paridns to the restroone. This will also guide patrons to the amphitheatre, vhich is in a hidden location amoat the ttaas. 12COMMOMT10M D Support should be ghee,. by the city to the Huntington Beach rlayhouse. particularily in finding a taaw Dale for than. This mar be an inter1w theatre, uatil the Center for the Fine Arts cows on lime. It is important that thin proposed interim theatre =t be smeller than the present location of tbs My and that the ovrxk3ad be less thaw they are paying at present. It should be a thrust stage Frith the audience an three siden, seating between one and a }calf to two hundred patrons. ?here ore a number of possibilities we have explored. We do not feel that an interim theatre be located within Central Park unless it is part of the library. The Central Perk Library has a theatre water-planned east of the entry --- also a children's wing is slated to be added soon to the r; West of the entry. Thfs atruucture alght incorporate a theatre space of modest proportions suitable for carmarui,tf theatre. Often such a space can doable are a lecture and demonstration space. Childrav'a theatre done by tsae comawnity theatre is also an attractive possibxity. A pernmumt free standing buildint of simple design alight also serve if it were located in or close to Qmsral Park. (fit Lary alma Bast of the library would be suitable.) This would automatically u provide parking and a city connection. Of course. the proposed Center for the Arta cotad provide a home.tbmt wad- tie most sgttable. But it'should be.noted that the comaonity theo.tre does not creed elabouite facilities sad that a modest pl&ce chat they could call and use as their own sight actually be prafw r&4. they started in a barn and that could still serve well today, had it not - i been torn down for new development. An intaresting and intriguing powibility involves The Main Street Library. This building is suited to a mall stage in its largest room►. which has a h:[gh ceiling necessary for groper lighting of theatrical functions. 14hat is especially exciting .8 the potential of tying in a number of cultural aspects of the city for maximum potential and use. The library would shift to an arts eaphasis, S with cultural arts bm"O arts related shop, record and video tape checkouts, film and television E showing*, arts lectures, etc. Naturally, any especially popular function now provided by the library could be retained. regardless if it were arts related or not. But the main thrust of the Bain ? r Street Library would be towarda the arts. That being Um cam, a built—in theatre would be a natural. During the day the library would make use of the apace. aad after 7 p.m. the Buntington Beach Playhouse would be in residence. The Playhouse is a good group to have associated with the library because the audience (older, establiabed) that supports one, is likely to be a patron of the other. "The FAim m Report", which details the advantages of the proposed city lease o: purchase of the Edison, facility.,on Main Street for a visual arts center points out that the Center could be "v1suaily linked with the Ykin Street Library to provide an aesthetically pleasing introduction to the Super Block itself." We enthusiastically agree. Such a step west not be taken lightly or timidly, hotieyer. It would require a comitnent to do everything necessary to properly integrate the two buildings and their various aspects into a cocoon cultural purpose. To be svcceseful, funding must be sufficient. The Huntington Beach Playhouse has some funds available which could defray the theatrical equipment costs (lights, spend). The rest of the funding for renovation of the space would have to come from city sources. The 8untiDgton Beach Playhouse is also exploring redevelopment possibilities. The final decision must be node by their board, of course, and we would only recommend that the city take a serious interest in this group as their own civic enterprise and provide all assistance it can to help community theatre thrive in Huntington Beach. SUFFM It ergs to be noted here that staffing needs inevitably follow construction of new facilities for the arts (or anything else). These new activities fall under the purview of the Cultural Affairs i Director and he or she will require a staff person for secretarial and cowsunication work. In i addition, we womWexpect that the setting up of the bendahell, watching the asphitheatre. and other jani.toral md security tasks would increase those particular budgets to some extent. Volunteers can S be wed effoctIvely. particularily to parking. abdfence asnagewat, and ticket sales and promotion. j A •fir cf ewwatioU have been left out of the first phase that sbonld be included later. No aoued egaipeewt is prided, for example, at either locations although conduit and wires will be Installed. Ilea following are atmre of the items that ahould be considered in the second phase: BJRf AIV �i 1. Campy for covering the band from the curt smd moisture. 2. Stand iiabts 3. CA mplete sound system AMrN3Z7 3YE 2. Up*rade sestlug with cushions 2. Expand theatrical lighting 7, 3. Permanent dresdsg and sake-up areas 4. Ticket booth 5. lechnical control booth x h. Permanent stage house and storage areas 7. Permanent fencing CFn1tAL PARK PSRFOX4M A.1 M - STATDOW OF PBOBABU COSTS OF CONSTRUCTIONIEWIMW PH" 1 Construction Coats Equipment Costa ! Priority 1. Bandstand - Concrete Stage 151000 Electrical Conduits 3.000 t Foot Lights 1,000 j Electrical Panel 1,000 "Wenger" Shell 3S.000 i S20,000 35,000 Amphitheater - Repair/Expand Stage - (By Y.ainteaance Staff) l- ` 5 Light Poles w/Elect.a Electrical panel 80,000 Dimmers 30.000 W.P. Dimmer House 1.000 Step Lights &,000 Seat RAcks 2,000 Dance Floor 3a000 $91low $ 33,000 Sub Total $111.000 $ 58,000 + General Conditions. Insurance. Contractors. OR/Profit 202 2�,2.200 $133,200 ` Total (Priority 1) $201,200 \-~ Priority 2. Bandstand - Electrical 20000 Lighting 3,000 Lam Chairs 2,000 Amphitheater - Path Lights 10jew New Walk 3,600 Widen Path 11.000 Not included: It 30,u00 . Fence, tent rentals, sets, + 202 £oko 38,-460 etc. Total (Priority 2)---3�348;486- t $2,000 = 54T4W- Later Phases: Bandstand - Canopy Buildings - Ticketing Sound Equiprent Control - Technical Booth AWdrhester - Masking fence Refreshments Security fence Dressing Rooms. %d!:e up Light/Sound Equipment Stage House Remxwel Restrooms w�MWeM,•h7.rw.rw..w.«w.�....��.......,-.-.._�-..-�..._....�.�.......w�.r.....��........r�..r........n... ...r.........v Y••�'1�. .11/!2�:.nt...�.r(4Y.-.r..+ . � M a � 3 � 4 M Y+ M o a u+ f ALTIA31 SrM SMIES SITE A - Existiat Amphitheater 177 seats located in a fine grove of graceful eucalyptus - ideally suited for a auall Asphitbaater. Constraints - Doubling the mime wouli lrsoee the intimate feeling currently existing. &a sight have problems with disturbing bird activity. Recommendations - Maintain as existing size and use for Theater and Dance. 4 ` ' SIZE H - Picnic area and elope south of the restroon structure This sitj; leads itself to the development of a much larger faci:ity, it 1s not as vtxWed, and there would be less impact on the environment. Recommendations - Retain this site for a potential large AnphitNmter, if the demand sexists. SM C - Slope area north of the restroon structure - a potential concert an the grass area. Constraints - Access limited/hidden, limited size for audience. noise from oil pumps. RecommeMatirms - Delete frog consideration_ SM D - Open area north of the library This site is ideal for open, on the lawn, Sand Concerts. The wind and sun orientation is ideal for performances. Recommendations - Use for the site of the Bandstand. SI'P'E E - East of the Library f This site is 1v close proximity to parking and servic- that is necessary for a Community Theater and it is not currently used. Constraints - A theater building could conflict with the open spac.- riex corridor and scale of the : brary. E Recommendations - If an enclosed Theater is to be built within the Park, it should be part of the Plaster Plan Library Addition. i= is. fUYiWEP Own cS 1. Enlarge stage to me"w"te larger dance performances. Advantages - Enter facilities for dance performers. Disadtantagas - Depending upon site, stage could be out of scale for the IaJ seats and the wooded site - 40C-5OU nesting would be preferred. - Metessitates tree removal, sight require EIR and potential apposition from Fish and Game, Audubon Society. 2. Incrasae seating, to 300 (remove existing and provide cll nPx seats*). Advantages - llEroa-Wate sore patrons. Graster ticket sales would increase revenue. More comfortable seats. Diasdvantarm - Costs M,OW - 50,000. EAm some of tht intimate feeling. Larger caamtruceion project - might require IIR and potential oppositias from Fiat and Ceae, Audubon Society. *(Tbe exL* pg wood scats cold be expandEd at each side and 3 to 4 rows in the beck- quite msily - but it would not be appropriate to expand this type of seating.) C. NEW SW SEAT AKPNITL PATER @ SITE B Advantages - Could accosrdste larger audiences. as well as broader (�3 performances. (500 seats is considered by many to be the minimus for a "Breakeven" facility.) - Retains the existing amphitheater for small groups such as Scouts and veddings. Visadvantagiea - Would test from SAOO.OU0 - $1,200,000. A. Sik1f WA" 1. Delete and expand the existing amphitheater to accomodate concerts tdvantages - Provides one facility. Disadvantages - Would require - increasing the stage site by `our times. - %mld require - resioveable risers. t - mould require - striking sets for each perforcance. 3. Relocate to Area F Advantages - Loses the open Iowa - free access feeling. - In order to minimize sitting on damp grass (that may be caused by the pent bog, or over watering), this location appears to be dryer. - Faces directly to the slope area. - Staff parking area could be blocked off and used for an "Arts" staging area. - Closed to the amphitheater, restrooms and dbility for shared storage, dressing rooms, etc.. - The site is more tucked away - with a backdrop of trees. - Less traffic to the quieter lake portion of the perk. - Does not conflict with the main bike and jogging trail. Disadvantages - Poor grind orientation. - Sun will be in performers faces. - Visual and noise disruption with staff parking area. - Boise from the library electrical transforaer. 3. Design so --p to better acconodate dance or theater performances. a. Delete tiers and provide a flat surface utilizing removeable risers. b. Provide permanent side wings and backdrop to screen "Backstage". Advantages - Better utilization capability by more groups. Disadvantages - Compromises the single purpose use for concerts. - Adds staffing costs for set up. - lbst dance groups would like the capability to charge for perfossances. s i BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC �r REPRODUCTION POSSIBLE, DTJE TO AGE AND CONDITION OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS 0 CA To�'iH)•51;��.r�ar.u,�'�.r+„r,� r. K ,� .... Ii rr'.';: J t' y 'n• '�1WV.1�'l.J ,r ♦�')r: . .�.�:,:l i;� �'.y .SL'•�',;wr.v.i;�`� y { + #t � -•' ... �` -� �,�/'' 'f`_-*P (�� � � Y, ,��ram' � to lit— tu LIBRARY ; C tit �ms .840 tog r e--_"_—•.r+ jam—• • Ji C�jj=f .. .a qj go. 4r Gcj -AL '. � � 1 ' CITY OF _.. C�Tt�l+1 BEAC 1 � -_ o� "� R4 E� /�� � HI•+C�C � -�- 1 .T-ERNATS. SIT �- l 3" ,1r1 Qiw o =� + ` nt/1'1 �� _'' / f .�^`�� ,., t oboe r � toil /. 466. 1 � . to 1 �1%�,• .�r . . (J/"fI/j I MI• ve i� fl� .. •„. rI � t O LIBRARY its Ile Til too 92-6 e•r --Cris ' • � al 00� 16 at ' L"' it t 1. 1%. low------ TY OF �'TOi�t BEAC H��C �� 1 of r C Y L TRAFFIC/CIRC'JLATIOP r CIROJi_ATION n t: The existing auto access is from Talbert. Stop signs are at the intersection of the entrance. Talbert/Goldenvest/Gothard are signalized. Recommendations - Provide street improvements along Talbert and the parking lot entrances. Improve pedestrian croswalk and define site entry through the use of C-1 landscaping, and graphics. f. PARICIEIG Existing parking .includes - 51 employee 127 Library* 4 - 20 minute + 5 motorcycle 275 south of Talbert 453 Total - @ 2.5 per car average = 1,132. e 3.0 per crr average = 1 ,359. The Library hours are Monday 1 - 9 Tuesday - Thursday 9 - 9 Friday, Saturday 9 - 5 Recomwen$atiosss - Parking should be aC-quote for try evening su=cr perfom3rces, when the Library is closed. Sunday afternoons will retrain insufficient for large band concerts of over 1.500. The employee parking area could be used for reserved TIP' season ticket patrons. S' The employee parking area should be expanded as soon as possible with 40 additional spaces. r Parking should be studied in the residual areas after street improvements. a South of Talbert parking area should be expanded to allow for adequate Sunday, sumer use. when budgeting permits. r~ ' • 00 i It ... . ` -f_ !. 1 Vote �. ef .•� -. . Afar :.. Alf jo LIBRARY fill - 1 �\ y I, a ]FIST Axym,it . lot � •.a 1-0 �w err oe .•�M 1 � fAL . TON BiAC i CITY OF , 1 _ RESS'TROW FACnJ= Thum are four restroos structures in the park, plus the Library facilities. All bat cyne of the restroons are too far away from the performing sites, to he practical. y lwa■seadations - The existlag facility is small but capable of servicing - the ptojected use. Upgrading to current handicapped requirexwnts should be accomplished. TAproving light and ventilation would be helpful. It is approximately 3+0D yards from the bandstand area, and directional signs should be incorporated. The band performances will generate the largest audiences, but the casual "on the lawn" seating lends to vorc intermittent use of r+estrom facilities. Large crowd everts. a.ght require portable cheaicul toilets. An additional drinking fountain should be incorporated. s i�;�;,/- .�., .,i 'jam ,�`� `.r. -._. .� .•,.�":�` t , TV RATES AVSNUC Lit 1.7 71hollo 14 Are f, ID1 • �' ��.-..,.,� _ /i : �1 •��!-� O ���' _.�7 �` ��� :� ,.._,ice�•' J�{,.� ~' ,� 1 94 i 1 ► �„ • J CITY OF }{&TIS QTON BEAC19 . �.. 1 ... �;� PLAN ` + AUTERNATE SITEr.5 1pY , ... �\ '. .., 1, ,.,.•aJ�,� I FEDEST}'.l AN It is ap�rozi.^uauly 3urt yards fro= the parking Crca to the cxisting a=pnitheatcr. Recos-.rdaticns - The distcuce is not ezcensiva - ncu walk should tc d"Arectly linking the perS:ing vrea to the eziscing valk Handicapped par!.i-r.6 and access should be provided. Waliraay lighting should c�, ins::al?cd. ':ne entry pathway st•cuid be lined with banters for evcntsl adding to the "Sense of :arrival." and anticipation, as well as providing dire,tional help. 5ERYICrJDELIVERY ACCESS The walkways ara now ut'.iizcd fcr maintenance vehicles. The} could continue to :rrze as delivery asses for ^lS!C83 instrtrents, equipment .and ..:tcrials. The rain loop is 12' �1GZCT uhtle other paths src 10' Wide. Reconcendations - Widen the pathway frem T'alhere to and ircludir.S the turn around *o 15' . . - a :fir.... � Ao �--�_.�• 2c WNW- \1I I 'f�l 5hi i'1 rr4 1p 1 )' ,�y1�• }i- \l I l�/ �• i• l - f f _..T_ 1 y� + °i fill rj >+ � � r- :, � / /� 1 � • te I,!"�".,)r'r�'(�'�I(1 r/y!W( 'rY �''� •,�- .t" ,\ �l I ) I j r ry� ! � I I - 1 � •• ' �•�f h ,� ';, 11 I I I .. VIN LL V 1"Oil .ram ~,_� _- ` "�� •,;"lam .. _.'�.`��� ( , 1 �`' - � � � .�"_ � 1 � .. I - - - 1 - S DiERCENCY ACCESS When the rimphitheater is fulls developed it should have a :::lni=un 2V vide accesrs within 150' of, a public street. The existing amphitheater is 4W* from adequate fire access and fire hydrants. 11he existing access to the amphitheater would be adequate as lor.,; as any improvements were ' jncpabustible. There is a potential fire hazard fro. any ecmhustible sets that night be built , as well as the existing wood stage (which has been torche.i several tines). Reti--raendations - Utilize the widened 15' wal`r, from Talbert for the Ist phase. Expand this walk to 24' wide for the ultir.to develop=cnt, and 'Locate rrw fire Ilydrants as required by the Fire Department. (These iters have been rcticued and 4pproved bJ Deputy Fire Marshal Tom Poe.) Utilize a live in "Carperc.-/C.;rctaker/Gc:ar:t" and irtru :an alarm. L ' - i ................ Ir�` j �� E J ice- ....• !' [ - ` A50— �• l 1' � (� t� �� -1` �, �. ,�.� �� � .... fir, � �� � ��J���J.- �� '•t.� Y a.! �,� - - ) is t�.` 1 l:, �\l � ,��� , M ! ;.� , r' s �i'�• L'a'�t,�-� � i :ate- _ ._�_--- �� LIBRARY =,.--- , t„� 1 , �i 1 �= �_ ; ,; 0 :'• ['-�, I Xs }I t � ': ..1•`l \11� �` 1 - j � fie- � '�'V � � .. �` 1 t., 1 N p o ( Tom r 1. pq me f LfayV.. tat •�. ,-� •[ _ �� '' •-ter, �I !��• f / .[ � � � M• 1 `., � //�^—�\tv�` ' •[ {r + '� - j � � .• —(, `. __-- Yam/ �� , t ! R # - r i � fff r���' P ref— TJty - _` �ljj 1 ' � r• � r ,� �'1�,j 71 LIBRARY 010- IT .. ---� ,MO LA WUEJ -•&rvM ..� i-w as .. AL . I I� o o f t MIAZCI CWPAT;BILIFY W 11f AiWACEN1 t!SIS GENERAL Afternoon concerts in the park are very compatible with pirk use. 'I3;e turn of the century music played by the fluntirgton Beach Concer4 Band would be a perfect .ind successful use for the park, increasing the en}oyrent of the pars: by strengthening the cultural ovportsnities. Summer fest:!val plays and dances in the evening will provi.;c an activity in tl,e park when there is little or no use. CO?�J I'�tI3C1'Ifl:d Concrete tracks, trenchiMg. building =Aerial storage will cause sore temporary disruption to park activities. but th=y would be cinor. LIBRARY Sunday .fternoon band runctrts, and evening wcekend ariphitheatev perfer" :noes vould not ruil!!ict with parkin; or library use because the literary is closvil :Jter 5:00 P.' . on Frida; and Saturday and Sunday all day. Weekd.iy and Saturday afternoon bang concerts could I:ave parking conflicts as %;ell as sound penetration. into the qqiet areas of the Library. Sound te:,ts should he done prior to :!ny use at that tire. PASSIVE PARK USE Picnic, open play ,areas wculd not be compromised by Lhe band shell cr amphit -:eater art fair activity in the _"caging area. CHMON OIL PROPERTY This area is fenced off frem the park. "There is scoe, pump noise generated near the restroom. Some music sounds might carry through to the caretakers rouse. StJgRIJNDII ii£TG'ciWFli(lQD The nearest residential areas are a 114 mile away to the n.er-thwest. Tho --,u shed will be directed away from this area and _hould have little sound icpi-ct. A szali mount e€ aiditional traffic will be added to Coldenwest and Talbert:. This Would be ea+!t noticeable at the end of the concerts or festival. Tnis would occur during nun-peak hours and would have little 11-pact. Assuming 450 cars at: is aaximum attendance With trip in and trip out 9W trips. `PALBERT - existing ADT between Goldenwest and Gotnard 5,300 l Add - 900 (17Z increase) J 6.200 ADT TALBEYI' - between Gothsrd and Beach 9,700 Assume I/Z - Add - 450 (4 1/2'% increase) 10,150 ADT WLL'MEST @ Talbert 32.4GJ A-succ U2 - Md - 450 32,850 (1 1/2% increase) BANDGiANDIA PHI H'F+T"c? Sound frooz r-he concerts could conflict with Aizphitheater use. Current proposals of afternoon concerts and evening perforr.":nces do not conflict, but programeing would by necessary to avoid •jverinpping schel ales. CURM The park closes at 10:0n P.M_ Perforaxrces can be scheduleu to correspond with this schedule, but it is tight. An exte:,elez, to 1r:30 wouN be helpful. i 1 . 3 7 71 i(j'J7J7J7J7 , •L 790 LIBRARY' _ . •1 •fry woo 1 i :gam Al 1 am fts r ! at AL i !I•EY OF WON SEAR i DIKE AND JOGGING TRAMS Free main aike and jogging loon could Le detoured arcund the bond shell and concert area during performances. ADVE.NME PLAYGROUND No conflicts would develop between these areas. WILDLIFE The construction phases anticipated should be se small that there should be little or no impact to the nesting, or foraging areas of endangered specieq. An E.I.R. might be required. (see appetteiix — 'letter Iron, Audubon) i i i t UTILITIES .XD(.`fRICAL According to Walt Sweet of Park Maintenance, there is adequate capability of the existing system to acco odate the 3.000 amps at the Bandshell and 110,000 amps at the Mphitheater. as well as the walkway _lighting. { SEWER According to Charles Staffer, of Park MRintenance, the existing severline at the restroom is too ,halloo to accomodate any new line near the stage for dressing room facilitics. Options include: 1. Provide a pum;f 2. Run a new ifne to Gothard 7. Establish any new facilities on higher ground. We recomeend number 3. TELEPHONE Communication service should eventually be brought to the control and backstage area. A public telephone near the entryltickzting area sE.Yuld be provided. { WATER Wste_ �s evailable, but a larger line will. have to be ri,n for the future fire lime. 1 i t i t i � ` � 1✓='tom - �/ 00 `I � i , ',� � I 11 - .: , ��� ,.� �� ' r•—.. WWI fly i / • � � � � �, ago . 1' f�: _// L. fin.—` J ��� !�1,J'! , 1 �'•� I r ., ,r• 'Q ffr11 r w �, III �'� If( � •l - { ;J e.I 1 i � l' � f•� �J _ J � LIBRARY �.- �•. t ! ,1� _ �' 0 i , A� t / I ' � - � '1 ',� (` - ,�,.� o •� �-� +,.,t/�` � :•p o � (I N�@ Tip � \1r�t��"`�•�_ � �� is Q ),• � , , ' / r j'.• CP ��- fir also irr kwu t r •t 1/ 1. IF iii�" TON cl, T OF SEA SAWHInc oil -AL.1was . t [� I( J `r is ��'` � f• tt '" -1, •.; j� � ' t / eft- �` - ,�ti/� :'• f l�l�/ `mow'-� .�- /`i/ --� , � t '' t •... �. - y JBPARY bps .� A • C NO TH I� •� : 1 I WERUE ti t 00 � .'^----+n- 11+ � ...�.�s---- ""'.. ••Illf��`�.-ram r r-----�-�--] (•Kf••M � ? Jy � � 111 � J It ii SEAC ? ! J 1 oil 1 ��E�C ,. CITY Q� �TaN USER NEEDS/C L3 GROUP Huntington Leach Huntington Reach Sur—mer Theater Various Dance Groups Concert Band Playhouse Croup (Co=unity Theater) CMACI' Click 213-741-:3032 De Berros 432-1555 Golden 'West Elaine Bower Affiliate 846-3927 Steven Craig 895-3108 ! STATUS Organized active Active, 300 core Not in existArrce Varies 50+ band subscribers 4,000 "Bert the commun- Appreciated, wiling list - have ity is ready". successful, selff- 350,000 for build- sustaining long irg, est. 1960's, history. local reviews. FERFOLMNCrS NDw - 12 outside 7 shows of 6 wks. Ever,ings - Varies city w/14 performances suer weekends Future - 12/yr. each - all family `very other Sunday theater Spring/Sumer comedies Late afternoon mysteries early evening mvsiLals Sundays - Holidays EARLIEST START Braked until Anyti-me Suer 1987 Varies ( Spring 1987 Church wants to need organizes expand into exist- tiozal time, staff ing space to get ready 6 ro. + lead GOAL Home base - permanent To provide pro- Performance Sunwer - Sunday enclosed horse fessionsl quality Opportunities Supper Serenades, productions city support, pride GROUP Huntington Beach Huntington Beach Sumer Festival Various Dance Groups Coecert Band Playhouse NEEDS STAGE Siege Thrust Varies depending Resilient/wood, wO x 40 large 25' x 36' 32 x 21 w1seating upon "Discipline" with 15' s'de wings tiered on 3 sines STORAGE instruments, ehdirs Sets, flats, furn- Sets. flats, Costumes portable steel iture props, props, lighting, z4akes, stands. irstru=er_ts, cos- sound equfpTent, stand lights tu=es, 1,0005q.ft. banners plus or minus LIGHTING far reading music, Up3ace existing Host Important Strong side lightin3 minor stage, particularly element - stage soloist s-ots light in-trurents lighting follow snots SWND Rand shell or Update/expand Qou:td effects ?re-recorded playback Wenger Units existing system. PAI'Music rag. outdoor speakers SEA11IiG 3O0 - 50O could be 140 - 250 2M - 3DO Va,ies .2n om portable and blanket on the lau-n 100 - 200 folding chairs. 3,090 - 4,000 for special guest events CONI-ML No fencing - open 'r.nclosed building For ticketing and Varies Inviting feeling '!.00ky Loos' and Nest tecause of security free concerts i i CROUP" 'r_unt{.ngton beach Huntington Beach Sumwr iesti-al Various Dance Groups Concert Band Playhouse TEc.mNiC,*L/ herds help with U3e volunteers Use volunteers. Dance floor SUMP lighting, sound. and some paid should have a lighting/sound seating, Could be Technical Direc- per--anent (part unskilled tors timc) technical staff and coor- dinating scheduling staff g1CKSTAGS No requireeentis SM sq. ft. 4 5W sq. ft. + Dressing, sake-up, Rehearsal. grean Dressing, shop, toilets room, dressings mke up, tcflets fitting, toilets, snake-up CrIIE: Pain cover Goad vissabi?ity, Ticketing ticketing j \ THE MAIN STREET LIBRARY MUM POTENTIAL AS AN AM. SUPPORT FACILITY An important concept for t,ic Arts in Huntington Lath is the idea of synergy, that is, the ability of tha- -hole to be greater than the stem of it's psrts, In huzan terms. this gleans that the s,parate arts organizations will have a greater impact on the community if they are related in some way so they may support each other and be more successful. ibis is the rationale for having the Cc=unity Band and the summer theatre program both in the save Central Park locale, with the PL.in Library adding audience potential and acting as a magnet for the new arts attractions, The Main Street Library could be yet another example of a ccming together of the arts for greater 1r-pact. rr the FAInnn Building directly across from the Main Street Library is, as planned, turned into an Arts Center, the library can play ` vitai role. We would suggest that the Yzin Street Library be revamped as an Arts Library. This would mean an emphasis on records, tapes, lectures, demonstrations, drama, films, etc. in the library's collections and activities. Those activities and collections that are now used the most (arts related or rot) could rermin. of course. Others of little patronage would b� dropped or cfoved to other locations in the system. Coorni..ation with the Arts Center wog.=e be vital on the wany various arts projects and programs supparted by both over a tvDical One such protect would be having a resldent theatre company at the library. Although this is unusual, it is not unique and has been successful befo-e. The cost stunning exaWple is the Folger library in Washington U.C., where research on Shakespeare and perrorxances at the library go hand in hand. Both activities support each other and the marriage is perceived by the public as exciting - as indeed it is. A natural resident for the library would he the iluntington Beach Playhouse, which is looking for a new home. This group is well established and has a loyal following of taany years standing. It is very respectful of its audience and is a responsible organization. _ 3 i Other reasons to give the !isin 5:.:—t '.ibrary this mission include the following: The library has the proper hai;,ht and space for a theatre is its gain roos. 2. The library is not a dynamic element in the city at the present tine and is ripe for a new mission. 3. The library at the present time does not use all of the space it has available. 4. Many of the patrons of the Playhouse are older residents, as are the patrons of the Main Street Library . and so the audiences will reinforce each other. 5. The patrons oL the Arts Center will also be compatible with the theatre and library audiences. i. Parking at the Arts Center in the evening is available. 7. Support areas for the theatre, such as office space, dressing and make-up, restrooss, etc., can be located in the ;ibrary without strdetureal changes. 8. The Cemunity Playhouse has done children's theatre, which is desirable in this new library content. 9. The Coum-.W.y Playhouse has funds for the extensive lighting nee-is of the proposed stage. 10. Roth the library and the Playhouse have indicated interest in the concept. There is potential here for some exciting work in the arts. It will require careful study and planning to icli-!w rhrough on the concept, since it is vital that the project be done in the best manner possible. The quality of *-he execution will be directly reflected in the qulaity of the performance of both the library and the theatre in the nrop3sed Arts Library. r -a MAIN STREET Ue `A f �+a Tv SUPPORT FA "AWTV \ l , 1 aua UWA" UgHgARSAL ASSEMBLY j Itow MV� f fI\ w j1uxvm KAU � 1 iAiAffuwwBE LTI-PUMP 2 LATFOR ———— } FIADWc Foot/ �� �.• OFF1Cf ALE IRST Flom Arr••ra r Ir RONI YEO FAIR ARCHITECT �r i r", ' t f 4 I t {. . � f �` i t 1' t i ...� ♦;,_,1 .v-., `�J ��. ��.. �����;� iF,;i ';Y�� �'�� � � .. . � •�,j�y. -f � S�; ���� � �1� 4 •r. •1; .. •,� r, - .. �-1 t ,. ^;}"' T- 3—P&A 00 se ���r t .ArRiLt,� t aUNLMITED 11OZ2 GARDEN GROVE BLVD, ■ GARDEN 04OVE CALIFORNIA 92643 M (714)537-0847 J June 23, 1986 i } Ilan I ao 500 Jasmine Aveaue i Corona Delmar, California 92625 Ions We have just received your letter in eeference to the Central Park Amphitheater . Wa aro very interested and have partici- patad to many such festivals in the past. enclosed you will find the information :esquested. 341loIrlet us know what more we ona do to help in the projact. 1 . Dan Collins, Artistic Director 11532 Garden Grove 1)Oulevard Garden Grove, California 92643 t 2. Up to 10 perforoere, between May - September 3. Weekend - daytime - weekday - evea ing 4 . We are a non-profit organizations, thGro�!ors a contribution to our organisation is test, if possible . 3. All forms of dance - musical theater 6 . main attraction 1'. 30 minutes to 60 minutes c A. As large as possible 9. Attendance varies 1C. 25 - 40 a year 11 , '1,000 mailing list; 0ur CaaPx ny i$ capAble of filling most all nee4a performance wins: and we Include vaca.t and music in out production, I will look forward to hiant:ing frost yeti iti the near future. Si carei.r, . Aanial L. Colltne Artistic Director h1.Ctfit 1 r Huntington Academy . of Dance 16NI dothard,Suite A Kunt{ngton Beac .CA 92647 Phone:(714)847-M7 July 110 158b Ron Yea, FAIR Architect, Inc. 500 Jasmine Avenue Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 To Ron Yea, I was very pleased to receive your questionnaire about building a stage in the Huntington Central Park. My experience has been that many schools and civic stage :~roas are not suitable for dance. A good example is the several stages ubed at the Orange County Fair, A raised, smooth, wooden floor is the beat to dance on, A ceinent floor io very undesirable because it can cause injuries to the dancers. In ad- dition, ehanBinA rooms should be as close to the stage area as possible. I hopo you have a budget that will allow for a professional-looking facility. That would be very exciting for the city of Huntington Beach. I have answered your questions according to number. I hope you trill find -my answers helpful* Sincerely, 1 f i Sheila Hanpton 0 mer, Huntington Academy ,f i i ' t Pi . h 1 INFOILMATION 1, Contact Person: Bay Hawk, CHairman of The Board 20272 Deervale Lane Huntington Be.ich, CA 92646 Homer (714) 962-6256 Work: (714) 841-2655 Sheila Iittmpton, Artistic Director 17731 Oak Street Fountain Valley, LA 92708 ifo,�te1 (714) 962-6468 Work: (714) 847-6657 2. Optimum # of performances between May and September 12, This depends on how close together the performances are. The closer together they are, the more we could do. 3. Day-time performances are preferable, unless there is full stage light- ing is avatlable, 4. We would be willing to do two free performances per year. We charge i $150.00 for each 4 hour peprformence, or about $6.00 to $10.00 per seat depending on the expenses involved. 1 1 5, The Huntington Youth Ballet is a classical ballet company. however, we often work with a jazz and tap Croup ror variety dance programu. 6. We are more than willing to work in a mixed performing aria production. 7. Wo can offer programming from In minutes to I'll hours long(a full per- formance). f 8. Ballet ideally needs a stake 50 feet wide and 35 feet deep with some room in the wines for jumping off stage. Although w* can and do use a smaller stage at times, this makes it difficult to hive the beat performance. 9. Anticipated attendance is from 300 to 800 people. This is difficult to gauge because it depends on advertisement and other factors. 10. We produce between 1 and 4 productions a year. We also perform in a variety of other performances, 11. Tlie size of our mailing list is 400 or more. If I cr,rld be of any assistance in your endeavor, please feel froe to contact Ms, r..o BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC REPROL)UCTION POSSIBLE_', DUE TO AGE AND CONDITION OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS MWbft Ow�ip CA 9NM CIWE,►1y' M July 7, 1986 Dear Mr. Yeo, Aa a company director working actively in Orange County for the past sir years, I can say without hesitation that the Central Park Amphitheater would De it welcome facility to my company. Good performance:apaeea for dance are difficult to find especially in the Huntington Beach area. We would be interested in one performance per year in May or early June.. The company performs pieces ranging from full length narrative ballets to thort conteaporacy works. We would be interested in both full concert% and participation in group festivals. We could not giv: a free concert unless it was underwritten in some manna: to covar our exptnaos. We currontly produce three or four weekends of dance per year. Out mail— ing tiat includo n at,out 5,000 names. In regard to stage site, a GU' x 30' area is needed to do major works. More importantly, however, is the type of flooring used. I art► sure you •s,4 are alceady aware that a concrete type of flooring is dangerous for dancers. If you need further information, please don't hesitate to contact Me Sincerely, r { 1` Kristen Olson Potts Artistic Director r 1 INTERNATIONAL DANCE ENSEMBLE, INC. 'i Ra Box 3352 Huntington etod�Ca 626M (114)635.3086 July 2, 19136 Ron Yeo FAIN ARCHITECT, 111C. 500 Jasmine Ave Corona del xtar, CA 92625 Dear Mr. Yeo, To answer your latter regarding the Central Park Amphitheater, I do Indeed think that the park and the amphitheater itself do offer great potential. Dunaj would be interested in participating in whatever activities are planned. I am familiar with that amphitheater and it is not suited to our i group's performance in its present state because there are no dressing rooms or other plane for costumes. The floor of the stale is a little rough for many of the dances we ,perform and wou d have to be improved . The r:eating capacity must also be expended and some form of enclosure for control of the tioket sales would seem to he necessary. Dunaj Folk Ensemble performs folk dances from several countries of Europe and the Middle Last. We also perform an Appalachian Mountain Clog Suite which we will be taking to Yougoslavla to perform in Summer, 198? . The nature of our performances, at leaot the longer ones, requires costume ohahges, thus the need for drites- ing roor�s. Somf: of the dances are performed barefoot, hence the need .for a smooth floor.. We are very flexible in our productions and -an either provide a full-lea th program or we can be one of A series of groups. Performances can be from fifteen minutes to an hour and half. 'We dn free performances on occasion, however, our minimum fee for most performances is $230.00. If I may be of assistance in planning something, please do let me know. I am in contact with a number of ethnic dance groups as well as dance companies in other disciplines. I have considerable exper- ience in prodttcir�gr dance performances and other events. I look for- ward to hearing from you. Co ly, i iCh dd D pee pis is �irector June 11 , 1986 Ron Yeo PAIA ARCHITECT, INC. Corona del Nfar, California RED Huntington. Beach Central Park Amphitheater Dear Mr. Yeo, Sea and Sage Audubon Soeiaty has asked that I communicate with you regarding the proposed expansion of the Huntington Beach Central Park Amphitheater and the potential impacts that may result from such a project. I am most grateful for this opportunity to provide some input pertaining To--The importance of Huntington Beach Central Park to the region's birds and other life forms. A11 concerned parties greatly appreciate your solicitation of relevant information. As a biological consultant and avid nature enthusiast, I have spent hundreds of hours enjoying the bird life at Central Park. Because of Its proximity to the coat and luxuriant vegetations few (if any) placer In routhern California can match Central Park's abundant in diverse bird population. (See enclosed checklist) . People have come from as far ateay as northern California, Arizona, Washington, and several other wastern states to see the birds of Central Park. In fact , i have recently run into birders from Great Britain at the Park! In any ease,people routinely drive down from Pasadena, Los Angoles, etc. to anjoy nature at the parks it is simply one of the beat remaining places In coastal southern California to observe birds at all seasons. Of the birds on the enclosed checklist, approximately 40 species have been confirmed as breeding upecien within the Parki I 'm sure that we will amid more in coming years. I ant presently conducting a survey of the breeding birds at the park for the Orange County Breeding Bird AtIcas this year it the second in a five year project. I have already detected a number of breeding species that are very rare or unusual for Orange County or southern California in general. In particular, I know of only one or two locations other than Central Park where Common Koorhen and the coastal Orange crowned Warbler breed In Orange County. It is also evident from the enclosed checklist that a number of s eciou that are very rare in California have been ober:rveds most of Usne have been penciled in because the birds do not occur in southern California often enough In other locales to warrant Inclusion on a standardized checklist. As an example, two Yellow-throated Yfreos were seen in Central Park in 1985 (one in spring and one in fall) t only one has ver been seen in San Diego County. Although nature onthuniasts realize that we must share the park with a number of other, often competing "Special interest" groups, we are nevertheless reluctant to accept changes at the Park when they further degrade remaining habitats and result in the lose of the remaining native wildlife. Of most; concern ore those species marked with an "E" on the enclosed checklist] all are state and federal endangered species and dll were present at the park within the recent past. Note that the Least Bell's Vireo is only one Of' four endangered species on the w 2) lieti we are concerned that all may be affected by the construction phase of the proposed project and by the human pressure that must Certainly reeult once the amphitheater in fully functional. Of the four endangered apscion listed, it is conceivable the California Least Tern may be the species most adversely affectedi individual birds or groups of five or more are routinely 6nan Foraging on the periphery of the lake and often pass within a few meter© of the existing amphitheater. Thus, we believe that an environmental impact review may be necessary and that the potential iapacta to the Fark'n rowaining wildlife be carefully considered with pattibular emphasis on the extent of jeopardy to the aforementioned, endangered bird species. We sincerely hope tbat a "No Project" alternative is seriously considered and that", ark in recognized as the extraordinarily valuable nature reserve that It in. Again, we thank you very much for the opportunity to easement an the proposed amphitheater project at Huntington Beach Central Park and genuinely appreciate your zoncern for the wildlife therein, IIM Loren R. Hays Biological Consulta»t on behalf of Sara and Sage Auditbon 21661 Brookhurst # 170 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Enclosure cc, Mr. Jack Fancher, United States Fisch and Wildlife Service Laguna "liguel 14rr. Dan Ypparaguerre, California Department of Fiah and Game Long Beach i� i. f r &Adl Ce ti'r r-fi L ____ .�Ictlti,r{�ail ct3x•E1't a'', : r F ►ry�+ w.Ch.ytk5 << ��, rl srtNTr i�R.Crr[� i Y. cn•wut.t[Kvur.allfor+u ►ins fir. fiP kit r , !'1. s'►'t l'1A ` } rill/8tr•,stet ia/allys Age t•// /�•1w F AAiL4?)' r c7 1t saw w, 011 us awl awea a1a+.fw,1 in 04114016,r�tMw Wallc...01la u" Itata4. Twa/ tern, W/ual. /r Wow WeMj nat~ are/ttlaeOles. wu A utiba NUACIA' tlwyll serer o►sortel trill; irWe w![/wt ere ltatar lose eY)t 3ei t' !dot.utattw. Ieeetr' ..+.-••-�- �wtl,r, bolt iWnN,Heal ,�satlle.lleea.Allai M1t'tier, Ilea 1 �ro,h1-/AswttM Xh t, Ilaf-.'�/1 111•�e. iu[•M11M �Jr171/. T►11..- rl, i)/taT1 I.r, atoll/ aiy CYTfl• �ww,OrttM atll.t �w _ta..t• t"aea •rtl. tltllferala D.,/.7NM- utod .�. tNtlwr ` �"0wlt, �OaN K,u„i,Y ao►w,earea VusittlArOft.•battler,ae 1 ate/» 4 ae•MYiM t►wN,I.M. t'11teLIM,IIM1a3a rertlN, ttw611t1.Ty j thM,Nrwi aaLi. also y"ro`^I'O''~' COY tnlcWr.rx"t/rL- leilNrV,nat, 11tfs.SE `Na11, Iaw ,lwWla(soya) L 3, rirl 3s Tlwrre, IlalaJl1 (336L) wt.tm.so _roAzwesat.L—tee trtili hMtR. rarer wWr Nt a } f IAttn OtrttYter. volts fwiM t, A"AW fIua•O,lr Gtrr � . 1*10" .. Syr, , Rer►r, also -voliiat jyaptR, Ii1tll.aaa4� �Iea1MIM�� )—or �dl treat taan,wf� CROWS". 1/11• •��i troetM tom• tKf-1rVd. w ►Litt tri• NaeVwa eNMtw. Wtr fWASM.cet+a•mllod tas►-retreiw 1woA CL .Isar • ►ees�� roaI**- R/dM-Afm .. llsr+et al. &pat A ..lrwlM, r711r r.'wa, Al"I'w par, L.ee1 Tom+.+• 11w� a (W. Abed to ,•,JI/ear.xv&Wa `04, [�xa,erwt fLervis . bombe '�,1e1> it Mftr beer We►weltaarr. ystlr,a �"rrW.�r�[:e +Gar'r^"• e�ltrt+�t 1dwM. loeewst "lltw• Nay iK 'Iarree, lrMear N Ceptloat,la,wtler/restet .� Hasa t�wwA, tearer llaea- Cwewoat, lraslt'o U,tort" —vW, y�mw „rt.1'aUtle �i113t. /l►et-a/a1d mi tbrlea`o + n� 11/eel. aeKlsY "y . tLItA I,Art,aewA'a rtw,fwne PAT" flow. taerlW tallaMlw.Cuter �,tout,rdw•w�watul rwr,IWWt 13� "- Staw, DiNt /e11401W.Loom NNrtaaO _ Ilwe."at yw AIR.ldltMrsr d' !• 'NN . 11 .past r W N dines trot Has/lyllrt. ~1, Ptil�lott CW64- -• u,i[tMr 1Rd�OYi,l�t1/ M�riMe•D . a.ert+IllNt.tsata s + aTf,�eNta L 1rat�°' /e•Mwtt 'thM.pwagil tlHtil piry• Oiueve -.f�wt� Ll*reolwiwela 0.. w- 13aA• Miw. yrtl•lflisfl �'lrtaly►Ir+.!o • vam wbaer, Ilw Cateat.laa/a1r t�i1 MN tyr r mLoltirN, tutor Ilya, Msltrh+td ^w Iwo. 11„IlaoA glra%at1tA, oll/a's —mueumor, PAO. `polov,,.w,�fle1f � psrwt Ia+lRttloi preNr,CeNt as.et,iw► �}tK1Mar. tltd —1u'+� 11.. =Iw too. gNe111M• •�'� i..,lar31N , oeH.l, roNL"N A taller,unaa'a to slller. Y:rlsre 1"PosaM. Loris ..�Qttal� taa.eslale aAnvw Qa:tM- �,hre/•Itwtre/alto• lsler. frYl ©=W. Mafr n/lswir♦. fwMaat,'1 M•Me fNtoa/1 lllet. ' -t.r►w/r.Ltlsn� Itert.wtt�staffs• tar' 17Or. fM:/n10 -�1aM Ir1R(MKtr;siJ sk n ,o gfo�w 1,tales ptr,te,INSt ttKK h�N,�•,�,j• 1ir+set.tsrt•1tttw iaYR. H,era.ti3lss{ w i 1 ;1!'■ �yeMN. Writ Tyre. Ialt'e[•! Ywt • t I sop.: wwt•M13ot ,� • ,� art at Ly L•ts•oelsert �i' twro '.Y 1� O'S garil`�M`VwarM'tY!• �; wt/t &wnijak r.hi�i,1 -ltt/Mrr,ri, !rr W`• h8111 Or/Mioaioot- • •, pMrtlreMe ...tea .WUTA- ^'LMeaaw• IOU �y fowMltls tir:aeata•, ptll,traela �}ii RIAG tom.J%441a/a '�• /,s �1 star. IertArrr, �u'a Ii.cf11N. !.i-eghli/ pat "A � ,MesraleM s M-�/ea�dtof�l=ty�� ' ISaal.tlsa,trStM)arat 1iaN1,W M R [JAU,Ilatyit{rir.IDM•e �MryNf,ileiRiN 'hliw- uil. YU at 1s1 ey.reual, V"Lvn C.LU troleljuUsi1,llertla! rsesetwaG. rw,.1'a /lataMN. ler,rra . =►/NK. : w,f{� 0»ok3o.Cert.tail/i ►Mrlralet IN1'8v [S7ea Q��yy Ceridil, �rR��« GebeKe ceerw %11 , raetrw 1/ n rW,"axle e3N1tIe, LiNNw< r:NetirN. yse���--'..•.�K� est pw►,1N -ta► Or1s,t teMe>< ref posse:bd a[eaotA tals.. pe/a•AN ieate,t VlArl!++will• trIV, W„ llw%at.eal,- U4111 t�.tq tliw•�I err. isfNt'o Nrs. f>." td.ar. t/'/e• rlrar,Mltlarl LW`'1u''t�rtn �Toa*,Dell -•=w faeetoil Mj'SM�M,hryis --c/a>aw.W)rw+tle Etc". IC14-1 T1t rle;tiil.astla'a we.,• rts� �./ s ��a tars. Faaw tAnUg �lr�qill,Yaataaa M •fwtNNt �Ci/NNIg3, let Diut}ttr,a1ra./Iweltetrrl "-Stub. Mt !"Olti aLfL rlaee, J �M� 1". /w .. ia3a �Np fraat 1iTr1f{.A • wr11.f irral/ c4u%vat, Loll" NaRtR.lerlNfra �lwa,•wash aeraeea fi11[llasa. t.w�,/.'s aitwl, lAat•!aterrl Ly,wK• 1)edt t meat DerNer.ItWa+41S/ WuLa a. /wartem a � �1wt�.w. .�rwt r La'■ �far,aWa, it.ealas wl, NIA-O"eet'el I,afias. Nwi+ana %-#It,limmie: re111K, Vfy 'yawl,ililo ass,I Jus*r, ti /tale! I ur, NatMW111R,tr rlteeN Tr11as �jt►�,let:.alid 1„allw, Tuaa ' Nratulat, t/atua r. 3f! taeailao.ts,:'1•ae• , Lw+,totwgoaewC �,./tel/t. envert's fd.'1lw, Rn" a • , t1�•r &Was. p-LA's It. eeeiie1 .oA.,w•• i. +-� ' �"as. NJSaor++ let.[M31t'• •taeara,aM/rtw clbl. LrreMLdltGDf• ai r -Rallis »I. holes gNa Ys,he_ �bVt+,reaT• rlastt'a V-saluer.t'owea/'a --- tOMt iCt�rI1NLP�n 1. MAMIaull%JW LuALy A.i OW-0 rt"bll � .Y11RIA!T j�f !{hnyis 1�If)5:� •olt{�..t•-st+t+,.1•! Sttl: it ctrt(rs e•OMEt161R! • 1�.�ltrt Cftt .� Rriti( Al - t 4-XJALL) alij a Il.1"Ift-n"rim&*A �!,ry'Chi iii- �, FlAafth" VIA t • f wit .«s .N�i mac ao7�Sal «* a- Avg' r �s s,L !13 I➢c �..t 'r-u s�,e� -e *,s -ss ,ar r-s n r•j ,�• tea...I s-7 r� 1 t v i i ,}• �Y , , 1 EXHIBIT 4 CW,UMITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARTS i COLTUTAL AFFAIRS I)IVISICN RUM MOATION AMPHITHEATER RENOVATION AND EXPANSION PHASE I Now seating for 300 or, concrete foundation = 50,000 N:w stage 40' x 26' 20,000 Miscellaneous paving and l4ndscaping 1OLOA Sub;;otal s e01000 PHASE II Theater lighting construction 91 ,000 Lighting equipment 33,000 Pith lighting and sound equipment 256000 Pemanent Stage house, wings, storage area (backstage) 140 000 Subtotal S285,000 PHASE III Ticket office/concessioriltechntcai booth $1450000 Perl"nent fencing 30,000 Remodal rest rooms 151000 Par anent dressing twx and makeup areas 5 Sabtotal $2401000 P41115E 1, II, III Total 66+09,0DO ., -.. `.�-+...,,t,,..wtrr+frrv� :.:vrN•rnc..w�rr. .....,...r..,•..,n c.R'.a>:.f'..:r:r+vtairf'h t.\r:iAt... ..e.rt:�......wr....,'..�......n...r s.,...�e w�w..TwM�7�Yf.. ytr rt. 1 . r ; r EXHIBIT 5 r"r CtlMitINITY SERVICES DEPMIMMT f ARTS i WLTUFA AFFAIRS DIVISI011 REC0N EWATIM C04STRUCTION OF MOVAND PHASE I Construction of 75, x 59' concrete sctruct'are S 200OUO Acoustic shell 36rOM Electri:al , lighting and ChaIrs 1, 000 Subtotal d2,QtiV PHASE II Canopy for covering bang! from sun and wbiR�:uro S 900000 Stead ',fights and sound systm 8,004 •`.• Subtotal 98,000 PHASE I AND It Total $16460OO PHASE 't I I Storage, uttilties, control booth, ud4t tioraal rest roans . 7a be detemimd w�......_._r_......,,..,..'. ...+..., ..r..,w..aia,..r ..trvi.•...rrnua..,«...u......-:vr..a$-4-A... 1•r.,-04-.4V6" .......ow� w..r..�/MfrM'��I 1 •;r 1 •r •, EXHIBIT 6 I � ALLIED ARTS BOARD REcaWENCATroN AMPHITHEATER it WVATI0M AND EVUS101 i I PHASE I New stating for 300 on concrete foundation $ 505000 New stage 40' x 25' 201000 Miscellaneous paving and landscaping 106000 Theater lighting corstruction 91 ,000 Path lighting 15 0DO„ . Subtotal s1P66000 $1860000 PI(49 11 Pe"Wnent stage house, wings and storage area (backstage) $140,000 Sound equipment 101000 Permanent dressing room and makeup arv:a So 0.00 Subtotal $200,000 $2001000 PHASE III Ticket office, concession, technical booth $145,000 Permanent fencing 30,000 Ikwdel rest rooms 1S,0t?0 Subtotal $100,000 $190,000 Pon IV Lighting equipment 33,000 s 33� PHASE I IV Total 22E2e/7 . ..:'.I;r./1•Y.�rw.r...as...' 1"r'.1.p.tA`,-7'.jYiil\'t�'1M1f.7 L/'.r.R.'..r�twA.ar+wow M.AM wn`�lr/Miw y, , r INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Rich Barnard F ax Bowman Assistant to City Administrator Director, Community Services Community Services Survey w Dow September 8, 1986 Council Follow-up Request 86-135 Pursuant to our conversation this morning and the- Council follow- up requests attached is a communication that was sent to Mr. Thompson on August 28, 1986. ?his his communication can be used for the Council study session Vednesday might, Also attached Is a. coppy of �the 1978 NCP survey i'/hich worked very well at that time. ;a might want to consider .he same format ror the upcoming survey,. mue: cs Attachments �1 !Jj C1rV or HUNTINGTON N CH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONI� ; Mw To Charles M. 3'hompson From Ji �qqle, Superintendent City Admiinistrator Pa Development i Recreation Subject HUNTIMGTQN CENTRAL Pfft SURVEY Data August 28, 1986 In conjunction with the August 18 Council study session, I met with an ad hoc committee of the Comswity Services Commission last night to go over the Huntington Central Park survey. Attached is a copy of that committee's minutes. The committee felt that the following facilities should be included in the survey: SwO"In9 Fool (Olympic size) Picnic Area rays"Ziim Sully Miller Fishing Lake Community/Recroation Center Restaurant Softball Fields Phase 11 Football/Soccer Fields Japoneue Tea Gorden Equestrian Trail Frisbee Golf Course Tennis Complex III&yWound Executive Golf Coarse Group Campground Racquetball Courts The timeline for the survey process is as follows: August 27 Comunity Services Commission's ad hoc committee reviews survey data September 2 City Council reviews survey September 3-19 Survey verityped and printed September 22- Survey distributed (approximately 60,000 in water November 24 billings and 2,000 available at cownunity centers and Civic Center) December Survey results collected and tabulated January 14 Community Services Comission reviews survey findings and makes recommendation January 19 City Council reviews sur'tey findings Note:. Commission's recoaemendation would be available for City Council's January 19 ameting, but not in time to make the December 15 Council deadline date. JBfi:mb 2221'e ittachment cc% Max Bbwman � r.+ � i.rw.Ww11V V,1M1•ti1"�'yM�'I{nww.+.�...��rw.�+w!..wlw•rr»��w+.r-KrMM'{IYAi'MAC.II.:IMYU.sMMMMNi VM�M�"T��!'�'^�"'��.1� COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION HCP SURVEY AD HOC COMMITTEE TTEE WEDNEDDAY, AU13UBT 91 . 1981, $SOO p.m. civic clmco r i mi PLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM UMBERS PRESENTS i Jeft Frost , natty Konnedy, Joy Rivers, Ire Toibinr Norms Vander Malon trrx officlol MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MCMOERn: Jim N, Engle 14voling commenced at $SOS p.m. A` special ad hac coatrritte* was established to tevi*w and update the 1976 Huntington Central Park survey for redistribution to the pubila at this list* . Aftet mueh discussion, it was decided some of the activities More Inappropriate, tot the park so they were eliminated from the original survey. An example of these activities Include a miniature train, skeet range , trap tans* . Metocros,s and a skateboard park . Also, facilities such as Adrrelatur• Playground. Cgaeetrlan C*Atet , and Amphitheater wet* eliminated because the Irtolliti *s have already b*en deYelopsd In the park. The following is a list of iteros that the ad hot ooaral ttee tol t should be included In a surveys swimming pool tolymplc sltel Gymnasium Cossmunity/Roctestion Center ti Softball rields Phase, 11 , Japanese Tea Cardon Frlabee Dal [ Courx* Playground " Croup Campground R*s t our ent -'�r foolbaillSotcer fields Equestrian Trail Ton"l s complex r;> zxe,cutIV* Calf Course Raequstbail Coutts Pienic Area sully Miller Fishing Laka it wars also felt that a snap displaying the proposed waster plan shoo I'd' be inclodood in the SUIVoy, along with the question, "De YOU approve of the overelt mast*t plan as depleted an the attaaked plant" 1 % will take two months to distribute that survey throuoh the water bills. The sutv*y wi ; i be presented to City Council at its. ...� .. .....,.-. r...�`sw.wtCW'.:.•.ti'^.Y-tF.eM►•..•.-...��+.+.....�..+wr» ..•w...w.w.:...._.i.Y.Y'.:711:.Yi.4..it1W.T.;i:4.•ri.,•..r.w... >..c.rrw n.w.�r�..—....r+taKlq.'�.• . l' September a greeting. It will then be yrinted and dIStribut (oh will bogin by the end of Soplambet . This would mean the distribution would be completed two ■Anths later or by the end of November . Allowing a month for getting the rooponses [tom the publlc and Compiling the data , survey results will bo available In Jsnusry. The survey will be publicised through newpaper releases and releases through cable television . There will also be additional sutfeys eval lablet at the Comwaunity Services Departteont office and the coswunity centers fat those people who do not teceive them with a water till . This should insure a high degree of coverage for the su►voy. lMeeting adjourned at Ott$ p.sa. f Respectfully submitted, e-4 M 5. Z*0L8 1>tiups+r l n tendon f Park bovelopment and Recreation i .�...�..,.. . .. _ _.__.�^-�-r.•+....w...e•.v.waa..n+. .......,.._... ._. .. .... � -..�........w.......r.�.wrA..-. v:+:nr..+-..-.......r.�.........r--.....�. ::f inndy Wig: 1 Z 9 R 0 7 10 MUMTI MON CEMIRAL PARK ><JRV0lf i W I-ra'm 1M � 80 VH C.7 now!WrM 1 Yn ACTIVITY AMOLWYOF ►RI*Rlrr ACTIVITY AAf'r OOf Nt PRIORITY Ad i Aw.r CI O C7 011r/eN f>ralNarsw 2.10 Ames Q Q f ske" Tale 30�r O Iffti'frwd FwlrTwl� 2.16 Awes Cf 0 1TrM�' !0 Arsr tIMN'w 1M�Y Now 1r Olwal 8.10 Ares C3 C tE�r l:Aar�rawrrt A0 Awes p Q fli,raw►irn 0 I N �0t Awir O 0 O rwr.aal arla.. 0�se AM" C Ci �o M►.CeRMwMh 2 Aaa r O Q Q t Rwew+ A%mMvmm x A MS D C3 0 I.wM Mvolow 1 A,ra Q tTrrMit x >t Aw+r D t0 ttlAMrdilt4raw►nYu.t irdaMMa 1OWN a 1 Q 1 A 1Astr A Awes 0 C VA*dkW ■Awar 19 Q11w AwpwT.PUN i 70 Aires u Q C Mop"wfnN S-10 C! rr IBM so t+nil t0 IRp ww 170 Awr D G 0 ��OnDpwr 00 Awes Cf C,1 O OrwlirM(10,000 tirthgi tgrrOMO b Awn O D D 1FWAopiWv lilt W"wdnO f AAM CWO. 0.16 Amos 1:7 © tc) wwrtr two few.v mol**k%0► 10 triM'a t�+tt �rer►utnha,A IrMMN aoruu.3 mnllrq rq►M,ri ti ►rwirlMrNsr t��rft"w 0.1%Aaar Q Q C] q r(Nol.rrwr►,awd:bor,aNioa ow}arkW4. "Ill C"U. t Alaraa L] © D Or+u+rwnll:r........_ ....._.......�� ail 11A1►►�1rAr 19 SUZQE:� yV�'yy,,w�...�.... .. .,...w..w�.1.t.Noy�.M•��r_�ih.�tiWV.w.rr�........w—�. .._��..r.w-...��w.r��••MMw.veV.l.'t<\..JiM1i�N.A YwL.��....�t.w....--..��.����r�-.rr�� .rrMy..«.♦�JJ 7 r RI5N,1T FOR CITY CG,N I;L. ACTION Data July 10. 1986 Sabmittedto: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Admin1 stratore W'-( Prepared by: Melvin M. Bowan, Director, Community Service 7 Sub INVOLVEWNT IN HWINGTON CKNTM PARK Comistent with Council Policy? (�Q Yat ( I Now Policy or Exception wslC,� '�', all Ax L e,9 Statent of laud. Rse mmendation. Analysis, Funding Souza,Alternative Actions,Atwchmetlts: STATEMENT OF ISSUE There is a rased to finalize the course of action for the city to pursue with regard to a cooperative venture with the YMCA for the development of recreational facilities +n Huntington Central Park. itECOMMENDATION Direct the city take a lead role in the planning, design and development of a natatorium, recreation center and gymnasium in Huntington Central Park. When the costs are known, a determination would be made on the involvavment and use by the YMCA based on the YMCA's fiscal contribution to the project. ANALYSIS The YMCA was originally given a three year ground lease on February 10. 1982, of four acres in Huntington Central Park to begin, construction of a pool , recreation center and gymemnasium. When the YMCA could not meet its obligation in three years, the City Council approved an extension of one year. On February 10, 1966. the Y was given a three month extension to May 10, 1986. The YMCA does not have the necessary funds to build a facility in the park and would now like to explrre a cooperative venture with the city. At its June Ili, 1986 weting. the Community Services Comermission approved the master plan for Huntington Central Park with a natatorium, recreation center and Uwasivam top priorities for the park. The Cons+mission recamended the city move ahead +pith these facilities and the softball fields as soon as � possible based on the availability of funds. i The Conti ssion was to take action on the YMCA involvement in Huntington Central Park at its July 9, 1966 meeting. Due to the lack of a quorum, the Commission did not Meet; however, the Commission Chair and staff feel that based on east discussions, the Commission would be in agreement with the proposed recommendation. �1 1 No 4104 r.�- F'MiC'VG1�Gt11�.A' F i ,I 1 _i1 YMCA INYOLYEMEr-MN--*4NTI('bN CENTRAL PARK Page Two POSSIBLE FUNDING SOURCE Park Acquisition and aevelopwnt Fund Revenue Sharing Funds Redevelopment Funds Proposition 43 Grant ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Terminate cooperative, joint venture negotiations with the YMCA and have the city move ahead in development of a pool , recreation center and gymnasinin. Z. Renegotiate a new lease agreement with the YMCA for four acres of the park property. ATTACftNTS 1. June 4, 1986, letter to Melvin Bowman from Bob Terry, Chtir"n of Wiest County Family YMCA 2. June 9, 1986, letter to Bob Terry from Melvin Roienan, Cmwnity Services Director 2076e MMB:mb MYFYfM+! •w�.nr•�.rw .y;♦f.MN^.I.flali Yh')IY Y :....aa+.4nn ......+. . a .. . r ....s.v.�JnA.LwY N.inM.Lla M.- .1fI. IM1�.. r..-.r......iw+�I w...+��wal�+.�..rMYM.' r WEST COUNTY F'A. YMCA Nerving thunlain Valley,Gards?n On► o,I l intinguni is uo,S<-xi waris and WeNtminster June 4 , 1986 Mr. Melvin Bowman Director, Community Services City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Max, Our board has been asked by both yourself Hnd members of the city council to set forth a proposal for a joint venture that would benefit the community. rn 1904, Meat County Family YMCA embarked upon a capital campaign and contracted the Services of a professional fund raising group, American Ci%.y Bureau beaver. The campaign raised approximately $1.2 million, of which $150,000 was last due to an Aminoil takeover by PhilLips 66, who refused to honor the pledge. Nearing the close of our campaign, our executive director ac- cepted another position offering him an extremely good promotion. Eight months lapsed before a new executive was hired, and due to a normal time for orientation, we are just getting up to speed again. we have anticipated for the past ye,4r to a year and a half, that a major gift from $1.5 to 3 million dollars from FOP, a health maintenances organization, would crime through. The delay has been due to the necessity of FHP adhering preri.saly to regu- lations not forth by the State of California. At this point, _ money could be forthcoming £Korn FHP as early as July, or as late an 2-3 years from now. During the past two months, Frank Mola has offered assistance in the Construction of the facility by keeping the costa of labor and materials to a minimum. Nothing more specific has been tied down at this point, Currently we have $175, 000 in the bank, and approximately $600* 000 in collectible pledges; for a total of $775,000. Our initial Flans for the phase I development of a fasailitV was A 35, 000 square foot plant by Parkin Architects at $81 per y square foot finished. Combined with an outdoor. pool., the project 7202 Garfield Avenue, Huntington lkmeh, CA 92648 a, (714)847-9622 3 4'h..y�11�..•'�...•.+.....,.._.....,.,.rt.y.ul►..c .ilr+w.r...w..v............�...,. .._.. ,. -..,__-....-_�......... ,-... ...v...-..�..-r..............-..........�w «r...w Mhr•.rh.�..Wr�/ Melvin Bowman page 2 would have cost approximately $3,165,000. phase it was an addit- ional 15, 000 square frot multi-purpose meeting room for accommo- datinq up to 500 people. Phase lI 's cost was approximately $1,250,000. Most recently, we have reviewed blue prints of the Lakewood YKA's completed building with Frank Nola. The 33, 000 squares foot facility was figured at $45 per square foot for a cost of $1, 575, 000. The pool would cost an additional $300, 000 for a total of $1, 875, 000. Thant prices do not include furnishing, equipping, or start-up. Both of the above facilities includes Gymnasium, pool, ad- ministrative offices, locker facilitiese, weight. room, Caxdiovas- cular fitness lab, meeting rooms, day care center, and handball/ racquetball Courts. We propose the followiggt 1) The YMCA will place available funds and pledged funds in escrow to be used for the project. 2) The YMCA will continue its fund raising efforts and pleige all capital ponies raised toward the project. 3) The City will provide the balance of the funds necessary to build the project. 4) Tr YMCA will staff, operate, and umirtain the facility it no additional coats to the City. 5) ThoCity can choose to build the facility where they feel it would beat serve the community' s needs. This inin effort between the City of Huntington Heach. and a non-profiL organization has been successfully done with the Boys and Girds; Club of Huntington Valley. we feel this could be ano- ther opportunity to bring about a benefit to our overall commun- iuy. E It is our hope that: the City will give our proposal sarioue consideration. yS�incexelYY Bob Teary f Chairman cc: City council Charles Thompson KNWw.yNr.w yI11.—rrrn.w.y,..r,.M1Ir.Nr•iiWMNY71'nM• r�+...emu..v.i............ r •. ....w.•w r,w..lwYrWl��.+..rw+�..... vr.rrr...wr y 4► • CITY OF MUNTINGiTOt BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA O2W CUMWITY URVICES bEPARTMUff M"M.ftwmm,06"I r (r1a1 53 June 9, 1986 Mr. Bob Terry Chairman West County Family YNICA 7262 Garfield Avenue , Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Terry t Re: Your letter of June 4 1986 Thank you for your 'recent letter. On behalf of the city, 1 would like to extend our appreciation to you and Mr. Brock, YMCA Manager, for meeting with us oft Friday, June 6, to discuss a possible Joint venture. As 1 mentioned, we will take your letter under consideration and formulate goals and objectives concerning a joint venture. i will be discussing this matter with the City Administrator, followed by a report to the Community Services Commission for its input. After that, 1 will submit a request to the City Council for a policy decision on the joint venture. We should have a policy statement to submit to the YMCA by the first part of August. Pleaar, contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, MELVIN M. BOWMAN Director Community Services MMB:cs cc: Charles K. Thompson, City Administrator ' Ken Brock, YMCA Manager ! Jim Engle, Super)nto.zident, Recreation/Park Deveiopmelit /-0000 r J... ........__�. ......�. .�.....�.'-..��.......__»-..r...-.._.....ram �...w. ...�. .............�.........��......� M.��.+�, r � , . _ .. REQUEa FOR CITY CaUNe. pt."TION Date _ June 23, 1966 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Ad,ainistr , pnpwodby: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Servicesu NUMTINGTON CENTRAL PARK W,Si'ER PLAN dtyj 7/ C'orrsirtertt with Council Policy? ( ) Yee Policy or Exception � -A Statement of Issue, Reeommeadanion,Arriytis, Fundinq Source,Alternative Actions, Attwhrtrentp: STATEMENT OF ISSUE lbW,W Af DOe— 'there is a need to adopt a master plan for Huntington Central Park, with priorities established for the development of park facilities as funds become available. I � RECOMMENDATION } � t`t 1. Adopt a master plan for development of Huntington Central Park commencing July 1 , 1986, as funds become available with the following priorities: 1. Natatorium 7. Day Use Picnic Area 2, Gymnasium 8. Theme PlaY9round 3. Recreation Center 9. Sully Muller Lake 4. Softball Comp'%ex 10. Group Camping S. frisbee Golf Course 11. Equestrian Trail/Linear Park Linkage 6. Practice Slicer/Footbail Fields 2. Approve the development of the softball complex in two phases: t Phase I to be two softball fields and the parking lot. Phase It will be a third field, conce3sion building and batting cage. WI MS On January 12, 1981 , City Council approved a contract vith Ultwasystems, Inc, to i prepare a feasibility study for the development of Huntington Central Park. Ultrasystaoa provided a list of revenue-producing activities that could be included in the parts. On August 17, 1981 , City Council rejectod the ideas of a golf course and hotel while approving an equestrian canter, sports fields snd the passibility of fast food facilities where appropriate. On February 1 , 1982s Council approved the ground lease agreement with the YMCA. The equestrian center has been constructed.. A plan for 11 500 linear feet of equestv�ian trails within the park is scheduled for completion fn FY 1989190. r, P104 . � .+..w!+..rt.r.,..w•....+.. w►.u•.-r•VMt�:7:.:-. t S:.7.r no.......tr. ......�.,..a. ., xt= yr .-..... .'�"N;Tr...1]h":. ..;4..'tr a,r..r..reraw w.a.w... '? i r HCP MASTER PLAN Page Two On June 11, 1986, the Com►ounity Services Commission established priorities as listed in the Recomrendation. The natatorium, gymnasium and recreation center are projected for development prior to the softball fields for a number of reasons. The adult softball leagues have reached a point of equilibrium where those teams that register are being accepted into the program. No Huntington Beach team is turned away. The variou,; youth softball and baseball programs have also reached a point of balance. One program declines and its fields are distributed to other organizations. An example of this is the demise of the Ocean View American little league this past year. Also, the youth population Ws been on a decline as represented by the closure of local schools. If there is a desire shared by the local groups, it is for lights for night Tufts, not new fields. But this doesn t appear to be a major necessity and will not impact their continued existence. The two-field softball complex is scheduled for development in FY 1986/87. The Ca ital Improvement Projects budget includes $103800000 for this project. When the softball complex is developed, it is felt that it should ultimately consist of three fields, a concession building and a batting cage. The three fields would make it easier, to con►ls►ct tournaments and yet would not adversely Impact the area. Also, the conce;slon and batting cage will be revenue-producers with a positive clash flow, based on research data collected by the city's architect. A two-phased development would allow the city to move ahead on the two fields, then complete the protect in the second phase. The Commission felt gnat a city of our size should have a complex with a natatorium, Vmasivm and recreation center. It was with this idea in mind that the Comm ssiorr recommended on February 1 , 1982, that the YMCA be given a three-year ground lease agreement. because the city did not have the necessary funds to move ahead with the project. This was followed by a one-year extension and then a three-month extension. Tne final extension expired MAy 10, 1986. Today, the YMCA cannot meet it•; obligation and the city can build a project in a phased development. The cost of the facilities is estimated as follows: Natatorium - $2.9 to 3.4 Million Gymnr,sium - $1 .5 million Recreation Center - $2.5 million Softball Complex Phase I - $1 .6 million .Softball Complex Phase II - $1 .0 to 1.5 million TOTAL: $9.4 to 10.4 million The natatorium is recommended as tht number one priority because Huntington Beach ;s a beach city without adequate aquatics facilities to make residents water safe". it is also felt •that, with such a facility, the city can maximize its aquatic potential for senior citizens, adults, youth and the handicapped. ./w..•V..w..�.-.�._.._.._��...rn.++..+bar•..rN..:N++tUr•......wr.+«..•.-.-....•.,.._.......... ....... r....rww..�«r,,.�..rr..4,G1�Wa1:rS :X,•:'•f:: r•...�......w�.r,•�.......� � r r! • HCP MASTER PLAN Page Three It is projected that the natatorium, gymnasium, recreation center and softball complex could be built within the next five years. In order to accomplish this, the city would have to Make them a high priority cl-Wwide and then explore all available sources of funding, but it is felt by the Conrnuni ty Services Comission and staff that City Council should adopt these tour facilities as a top priority and approve the master plan as a whole to provide overall future direction. POSSIBLE FUNDING SOURCE Park Acquisition and Development Funds Redevelopment Funds Revenue Sharing Funds Proposition 43 Grant ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Approve the priorities, with the exception of making the softball complex as the first priority. P. Approve the priorities excluding the natatorium, Wrinasium and recreation t center. I 3, Construct only two ball fields with parking. Do riot build a batting cage and corwession. ATTACNNEMTs Master Plan Conceptual Plan Facilities Priority List Softball COMIax Plan Master Plan Narrative MM�:►ab 2090e T. a �.�ww ...• w.y..afyuNR'W;+.nY NK."p. ...w r�.....r........ .+...r..+.w....�.:..lt• ?az•.Y.r.AY•-c;ar.: . r.�afr.ai.-r•.-.•......� r.�.. r l BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC REPROD13CTION POSSIBLE DUE TO 7 .AGE AND CONDITION CIF ORIGINAL, DOCUMENTS / .Il E . . d�� �A��y1• ■f�� i is V A.+{an"l?may+�.o"1r �t•t•.�.•-+.-. ,.n� �►..�T; RN ,� �,.tCz,� 1r� t 1. a { - • � 3 -',.I J•+ •�•1 ���•_ ••• ` ..� • .li:.�.. � ` • •tom , • • ,, •r' . • `• � T � 1� It � t 1 all 14 FI /� ._ + • •+ .n .�.•�-�:-r�i r,1 _ �7• �..ca�+:+ "�rp is �s�� f `� �>tf�• _ � - lip It 16 01 ^' ' r: -'S' r' .��'�r`_`�J 1%�Fes+ 'r%r , ,:� •' < ,4.r M RK MASTER FLAN r�UNTI!lGTON CENTRAL PA PARR ACMISITIOM AND DEVELOPMENT FUND UiIFINIDED Natatorium or urn Amphitheater Gymasium Playhouse Center Softball Complex Frisbee Golf Practice Soccer/Football fields Day Use Picnic Area Thence P1 ayground Sully Miller Lake Group Capping with Parking Equestrlan Trail/Linear Park Linkage (5-10 yrs) OTHER F'UNDIK6 SOURCES Gun Range (Revenue Bonds) Handicapped Play/Picnic Area (Proposition 1$ Grant) RY Camping (Revenue Bonds) 16539 June, Ig86 /lM.w�•r....w.w•........�..•�w.w.wwnMaawt:tltw✓fl'Y�.)+.+^' nr ..�.+..r.µ c.a..:.air.r.wr�lwr"v.� f�ii'lQtlyi.Y►4:=i}M� •R�w.s rwr.rr+�w w.iM•.wr+w..iw� i a J r lu oil r � ; . SET = L � • ,��� M � ���PLAN , � City of Huntington Beach Cardoza-•DiLallo-Harrington was given the task to re-evaluate facilities proposed in the Economic Feasibility Study and subsequent revised masterplan. Options for consideration and study included: Softball Sports Field Complex Gun Range Refurbishment Gymnasium/Natatorium/Rec Ctr � . Sully ?tiller Lake Phase It RV Canping/Mobile Hose Relocation Japanese Tea House/Gardan AWhI theater/Playhouse Huntington Lake Frisbee Calf Course Relocation Open Natural Areas Equestrian Trails/Holsa Chic& Park Linkage Group Camp Area "Atlantic" (Theme Playground) i� SOFTBALL SPORTS FIELD COKPLEX + Ob ective: Provide two to three league-play softball fields with adequate parking, concess Ion/reatrootr building, and appropriate associated amenities. {, Although three (3) areas of Central Park Would lend themselves for the softball complex, the area selected for this facility is adjacent to Golden West, south of the Nature Center and north of the present frisbee golf course. This area Is ideal in that the existing rough grade provides for an approach at ;tlwe Talbert signal and .-eceaaed areas for the fields that would mitigate name reound and night: lighting. The centralized »ocation, direct access rrom Golden West, and prcximity to the future recreation center/natatorium complex art of a great advantage. -The alternatives proposed maintain 90% of the existing mature trees and { peripheral walk system that Will separate the fields from the current picnic ' and open play areas. To further mitigate noise and field lighting fro■ the residences along Lakeview a berm and further mass planting is proposed on the west side of the fields. Orientation of the fields is of a Concern for competitive play. However, Community .service's staff feel that night play will consume 80% of their reservatiorhs. the Community Service's requested distance of 3501 from hoseplate to canterfield has been mat on all fields. As a revenue-producing facility, a concession/restroom building is proposed. This structure will not only serve the immediate needs of the participants and spectators but will provida !or a central cant rel point .for security and field moni toring. To '> enhance the complex, a combivatton betting cage Is proposed to not only provide Mani• up practice for the players, who currently seek this activity elsewhi+re, but: provide an additional income resource. 77 .. .. A/a:M r'�tw..\.Kf'V�R•..N:af:7tWrM`wwu�r.rMF;.4 I � t GUN RANGE REPURAISIMNT Objective: Provide gun shop, class room and appropriate support facilities, Le: children'ra play area and parking, for an outdoor handgun (only) facility for police and public use. Some major concerns relative to the positioning , of a gun range facility Within Central Park are its juxtaposition to other recreational amenities, mitigating sound, and controlling "stray" bullets. The best alternative to accommodating these needs is found in the design of ranges that are recessed below ground level with appropriate bullet "traps" or. "eyebrow catchers" and partial of full overhead systems (not necessarily roofs). This being the case our first alternative is to move the range to the county transfer station area, should this acreage be acquired. This area is not only currently graded with below ground access but the soil structur• is more stable than that of the currant site. The second alternative is to ebuild the range facilities on the current site but with some major regrading and roil stabilization% by soving the facility to the county transfer station adjacent to Gothard, access would be greatly enhanced. In addition to developing a regular parking facility, a major building is being proposed providing space for range officer control, a pro shop for sales/rental of also and accessories, and classroomw for hunter safety and other courses. Since the sport tends to be family oriented, areas for picnicking and children's play equipment aria nestled into a pleasant Ltmosphere of plant material and rolling mounds, kunge safety is of the utmost concern and the National Rifle Association has explicit recommendations for developing, s�intaining, and operating outdoor pistol ranges. Pathough estimates for construction range from $200 to $10,OOO per firing point, funding iaay be avRilsble from the Pittman-Robertson Actio a f*deral assistance program ov revenue bonds. GYMNASIUM/NATATORIUM/RECREATION CENTER Objective: Provide for a triple-gym gymnasium with locker roots, natatorium with x 25yd Olympic pool, and accompanying recreation centers The complexity of providing the multiple uses described is simplified by a very accommodating site and the ability to modularly combine or split the facilities. Budget phasing and "controlling rights" will affect the final outcome of the configuration. Critical to the design is direct acceusibility from Golden West and traasitions to a wide variety of recreational users that Would normally be a spare consideration, especially a competitive-quality softball complex. L•ocAting thLs complex on the bluff to the east of Huntington Lake, betwton the equestrian center and rho proposed softball complex offara the widest versatility and marketability. The addition of a civic complex as being proposed will greatly enhance the recreation services provl6ad by the City and offer tha residents another source of coussinity pride. 2 `1 •-•..ra.n.�, _ ....a...+--•a••.v..zea,q•41:1:... f.+.'iY A:. :. -'era...• .. . ., ra.r`..i!_• .. a• .•..i••1i t- wi�./..:, . .. .. :l..ri.:f':Lh7Lf'Lllfi r.%c`I:M ^Ml.r� •+•r.+w�a.• SULLY MILLER LAKE PHASE I1 — MOBILE HONE RELOCATION — R V CAMPING Objective: Provide appropriate facilities for fishing with the possibility of incorporating a tackle shop and snack. bar. Work vith mobile home relocation project and design of current mushroom farm area for future recreational vehicle camping facilities and day use picnicking. Although specific plans and construction documents are not due to be completed until fiscal year 1989/90, the area of Sully Miller lake and the immediately adjacent areas impacting the lake are a key factor in the masterplen effort. The first phase of the mobile home relocation effort has been completed. The efforts extended in the next phases o: relocation should consider the mutual and long-term benefit of design that encompasses "naturalistic" settings for future recreational vehicle camping. Another consideration is the aesthatic Impact from Within the site and as viewed from Golden West and surrounding facilities. Alterations to 0 lake edges themselves are being proponed to provide "picnic niches" in very aturaiistic surroundings with a view of the lake and "walkable" access from the future phases of mobile hoses or recreational vehicles. A fishing tackle/rental shop and parking area is being proposed for the area adjacent to Ellis, Docks or piers into the lake will provide a "lazy weekend advanture". Another alternative considered is for thu area at the corner of Golden West and Ellis when the current mobile home relocation site reverts to recreation/ leisure type of activity 3n ten to fifteen years. This corner may be the choice location for a theme restaurant that is a (1) direct correlatiou to t:bra sgwstriaa community and future . residential *states being developed south of E11is or (2) nautically oriented and over lookina'Sully Miller Lske. JAPANESE TEA HOUSE/GARDEN Objective: Evaluate the possibility, appropriateness and economic feasibility of aSister-City Japanese tea house and garden. Much study has gone into the potential location of it Japanese 'Tea Garden. Central Park would seem to lend itself very well to such a facility. Two possible locations were considered. One, in the area on the intermediary- bluff to the east of Huntington lake and the second, on the slope to the west of the literary Harden at the library. Costs of such a project depend upon size and complexity of the garden and tea house. To be feasible, it will be necessary to scale the project to our potential sites and determine what assistance can be received from outside, interested parties. In the past twelve months, the City Administrator has been coordinating with representatives of Sister City, Anjo, Japan, who have Indicated they would be willing to work with the city an the design, architecture, labor and matertals to bring to fruition a tea garden in 11CP west of the library. 'We feel that by scaling the facility to a reasonable area of approximately d quarter of an acre and using the natural landscaping now existing, this project is feasible. Even though the tea garden is not included in the recommendation, staff will be bringing this project back to Council as a separate item once negotia- tions have been finalized with Anjo. 3 '� ��, '+. }1M1'�1�,`�'., ;�zs•a-:l . •, . .c.,.,:.�,',.��.T��. +.r.:.' t - t;:3hfi''lyy5+%.�Y� � a AMPHITHEATER/PLAYHOUSE Objective: Incorporate enlargement of existing amphitheater (will be 300 capacity) and coordinate efforts with architectural consultant exploring possibility of buildLng a playhouse. At this point in the masterplan study, it is felt that the impact of an enlarged amphitheater would necessitate an overall re-evaluation of the current pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems near the library. As far as the playhouse, there is the question of appropriateness Within Central Park. It is the current recommendation of Cardona-DiLallo'-Harrington and the Community Services staff that an adequate site is not readily available to support the needs of the peripheral faci littea, is: direct access from a major arterial and sufficient parking, either by a structure or open land allocation. HUNTINGON LAM Ob ective: Provide for shoreline atabtlitation, fishing pier, and pedal boat operation dock. The impact of developing the aforementioned facilities is not directly related to the current masterplan effort since there are no recommendations being made to alter the shoreline configuration or adjacent current recreational facilities. Slated for fiscal year 1987/88, specific plane and construction documents would be very easily prepared following a re-evaluation of the necessary re-circulation system to Improve the water quality. Also at that lisle minor changes would be recommended for the pedestrian system along the east side of the lake directly at the bottom of the slope for easier security patrol. FRIS888 GOLF RELOCATION Objective: Provide re-location for or modifications to existing course if =J or recreation center/natatorium/gymnasium in proposed for bluff area. Since the best site for the recreation center/natatorium/gymnasium is proposed for the bluff area west of Golden West, the frisbee golf course will have to find a new hose. The best area for relocation of this activity is a "reverse V area that wraps its way from the Talbert parking area down and in and behind the proposed recreational vehicle camping area. This landfil l area will be appropriately graded and landscaped to provide even the best of players an awaiting coursed but with the unpradictnble settling this course may take on now very competitive challenges. 4 .._.�. _.......w.—..,.....-w••......d.t�yllaM`.•h.rc,iu•«. .. .....__..... .. r. .`. :YO ...:*4.�.•0.\1 ;.«. ':.rl:.',\Z nf.vr.at ; r. .w. w..... ..w.. «w.ry..^"�.gIYR OPEN NATURAL AREAS Objective: Analyze potential uses for projected open/natural areas. There are essentially three key "open/natural" areas within the legal boundaries of Central Park. These are (1) the current landfill area at the cornur of Cothard and Talbert, (2) the elongated area to the east of Gulden West, mouth of Talbert and north of the current mushroom farm area (future recreational vehicle camping), and (3) the very large arEa to the east of Edwards and north of Ellis, inclusive of the "midden" area known for its Indian artifacts. Due to the nature of the current .landfill area settling for the next several decades, it is the recommendation of Cardoza-DiLallo-Harrington that this area be developed as on open play area with turf, trees, and irrigations Wide spaces within that area would accommodate a family and informal group "pick-up field sports", soccer, or a "practice" area for softball teams prior to competition in the major complex to the west of Golden West. The second area along the east side of Golden West is also a former landfill area and not only has a continuous settling problems but in the lower station near the current mushroom farm, a methane gas emission concern. The upper portion of this area immediately south of Talbert has been elated for family picnic and possible major theme-oriented playgound facility. The lower portion has been considered for a gravel-type parking area in the likely event that with the future build-out of the theme playground area, day use area adjacent to the recreational vehicle site and use demand in the future frisbee golf area additional parking will be required. The recommendation for the large area to the east of Edwards and north of 19111s, inclusive of the "aatiddea" area known for its Indian artifacts, is that it remain in its "natural" state without a manicured landscape. This area is and should be utilised for the equestrian trail system. L UESTUTAN TRAILS/80LSA CHI CA LINEAR PARK LINKAGE, Ob ectivea Provide modifications to existing system relative to encyclopedia lots, Dols& Chien Linear Park, proposed road alignments, mir_den area, existing equestrian facility, proposed planning modes for adjacent residential. At this point in the analysis of the large open space dedicated to the equestrian trails, Cardona-DiLallo-Harrington is recommending adhering to the trail alignment approved in the March 1984 Equestrian Trail Masterplan Study. Contact has been made with Ron Tibbets and the staff at Orange County Environmental Agency regarding the progress being aauade on the design for the Bole& Chica Linear Park. At this time it is the mutual agreement of all concerned that' tha eventual "link" into Central Park occur at the Intersection of Edwards and Lakeview Drive. These areas will be reconsidered or altered at such time as the Ellis/Edwards "cutoff" is constructed. 5 .w+•...... ..y... .. s..\.1�MLr..f'..'U i\SSA\' )tT'.\.4i r.�ai\\`.......• �,.. ...., ..,./...1:.:4 t':f•l.:Wr�^,1C.:. ... f_ �w.•l1.fYMNi4a TTIM�>r.Yi'JM GROUP C/J4P AREA Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness and appropriateness of a group camp facility being proposed by the Public Works maintenance staff. The plan as presented to Community Services and Cardosa-DiLa1lo-Harrington by Jerry Lochmann and Daryl Smith is •nary comprehensive and articulate. Recognizing that minor adfistments prior to final construction documents will need to be made to accommodate American Camping Association regulations and a detailed user analysis, the only major area of concern is the entry/parking transition area south of the corporate yard. ATIS (or therm! playground) ONactire: Study the feasibility of incorporating a facility similar to Atlantis in Garden Grove. Information obtained from Garden Grove indicates that Atlantis Is a thriving and adventuresome facility. Depending on the land area allocation or budget constraints, an alternative type of "theme" playground could be proposed. Thin could range from the wild and exciting adventure of "Indians Jones" to exploring caves and tunnels to something more sedate as a haritago play adventure or exploring the "old west". This facLlity is being proposed for inclusion in the picnic/open area at Talbert and Colden Nest. , t' 1 6 �,rt�•r...w.w.My..w..wrY/I..y1MM.......+R�^..'+•�.M_�...w..+•.Mw r.M.Mr. _t L1 �' CITY OF HUNTINGTE'fN BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUMTINGT1ylY RKH Alicia Wentworth Ron Hayden To City Clerk From Acting Libra Director Subl t REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Date December 20, 1985 Thin is to, inform you that the Community Servicee Department has ` sent the attached letter and Request for Proposal Project I, i, Central Park Amphitheater and Project II , Construction of Theater in Central nark to the following consultants : Mr. John von Sseliski, Coate Mesa Stewart Woodard i Associates, Costa Me$A Mr . Joe Musilt Long Beach Mr. Ron Yea Dougherty and Dougherty, Newport Beach •J� Mr . Carl McLaren RI3 19c cc: Max Bowman d .4 ry •,,, CITY OF HUNTING TON ON BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT (Melvin M.9ownw.Director LIBRARY INFORMATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES CENTER 7111 Talbert Avomm,Calif ornla 92648 (714)BU-4481 December 17, 1985 Gentlemen: The City of Huntinton Beach is submitting to you two (2) projects for your consideration. We invite you to prepare proposals for the designing of the expansion of an amphitheater in Huntington Beach Central. Park in addition to a feasibility site study for a playhouse in Huntington Beach Central Park (please see attached RFP 's) . If you are interested, please submit your proposal to Huntington Beach Central Library, 7111 Talbert Avenue, Huntington Beach, California 92648 by .January 31, 1986 . If you have any questions, please contact Ron Hayden, acting Library Director, at 960-8836. Sincerely, Melvin M. Borman Community Services Director lMMS:RH:gc �.y�^Hy..w..���...r . ..._ ...�.�+.�._.�+Yt M4avnM0.1M.s .r �. ti..- .. . .�• ...:'t .. .• 1.11 Y-)3.'t. ... '. ......SlttX �4t'NiY1Rl�w.+..N�� 1 t y i CONSULTANTS I Mr. John von Szel.iski ! P .O. Box 11060 Costa liesa, California 92627 Stewart Woodard 6 Associates i 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite A-6 Costa Mesa, California 92626 Mr. Joe Musil 398 Roycroft Avenue i Long Beach, California 90914 f{i Mr. Ron Yeo i 500 Yasmine Corona Del Mar, Calif . 92625 i Doougherty and Dougherty 3 Civic Plaza j Newport Beach, Calif. 92650 Mr. Carl McLaren 695 Town Century Drive Suite 300 Costa Mesa, California 92626 , i } s I t ' 1 .I 1 'f.r .....-.. . ...+wnYY.4I7.'." .+YY v�IM. CtvWt:'.'.'.:'1::-: 'M. ...Jt. '.LIa'.2t..'j. ..r:ntl�iy MMR.41Yli.. .•'!/YAI.l1i.:.r.w+....w. ..�w +or r.-.rww .+� r 1/d f_ w- t REQUES . FOR CITY COUNCIL NCTION Date September 25 1965 Submitted:o: Honorable Mayor and City Council / /1 1` s r Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrate PrWaredby: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Servi- i Subject: EXPANDED PARKING IN HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK Consistent with Council Policy? (x) Yes ( ) Now Policy or Exception Statement of issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Sourer?, Alternative Acti ,Att7chm@nts: STATEMENT OF ISSUE There is a need for expanded parking in Huntington Central Park. RECOMMENDATION Approve plan and expenditure of $36,500 from mark Acquisition and Development Unappropriated Fund Balance for expansion of the parking lot southeast of Talbert and Goldenwest in Huntington Central Park and authorize staff to solicit bid?, for construction. ANALYSIS The popularity of Huntington Central Park continues to grow. During high use times, there is inadequate parking at Huntington Central Park for park patrons. To meet this need, City staff has prepared a plan to expand the existing parking lot by eighty-nine spaces. The expansion would also include fights that are needed to insure safety. These additional eighty-nine parking spaces would also serve for overflow parking for the library. The cost of this project is $369500. The Lummunity Services Commission voted in favor of recommending this project io Council at its September 11, 1985 meeting. FUNDING SOURCE Park Acquisition and Development Unappropriated Fund Balance. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Do not expand parking lot at this time. 2. Include project in Capital Improvement Projects Budget for FY E6/87. ATTA 1. Location Map 2. Fiscal Impact Report 0106E/24 MO 4M MYiY1r.w�'..+•....... .... _..-�.... 'L. .Y-.�1 i7 : ... �Y .• ,. • w, ...YI. fir:l'.:.•.'�'1t .n.'C:iA".�.,.. .1 .. .. -1:... ......+.. i rY.�j..�/�.1�:�Z'+>�+ tt' IC BEST PHOTOGRAPH REPRODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO AGE AND CONDITION OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SIECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 35-5-11 • CITY OF HUNTING rrON BEACH A& 011ANGEA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA U9E OF PROPERTY MAR a rk tpq Lot A'a L j Iii iE� 11WHiliF., it L Huntington Central Park CF-R r-77 L fir/ 1 J 7 1_2 ,FTT, AVC CITV CW HUNTINGT ON BIRACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION NtWiWGRJM 1eKN f To Charles W. Thompson From .1 ff :•',Robert J. Franz City Administrator Deputy City Administrator/ Chief of Administrative Srvs. Sublect APPROPRIATION FOR EXPANDED Date Septemtx-r 27, 1988 f PARKING IN HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK PIS 8" I I � As requested under the authority of Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Report has been prepared and submitted relative to the proposed expansion of the parking lot in Huntington Central Park. It is anticipated that en appropriation of$36,500 would be adequate for this purpose. Should the City Council choose to appeovee this requeat, Va balance In the City's unrestrieted, ? unapprcpriated Park Acquisition and Development Fund will be reduced to $2,839,256. i HJFsJHE/lb 1404e i t I f� f i S 1 r FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT HUNTINGTnN CENTRAL PARK ADDITIONAL PARKING The attached RCA recommends the expansion of the parking lot in Huntington Central Park southeast of Talbert and Goldenwest. Eighty-nine spaces would be added to the existing lot. i 1. Budget Status I� This item in not in the budget because it was not identified as a major problem at tha time of budget preparation. With the continued growth of park usage, lets are now periodically overflowing and it has reached the point where additional parking is required to satisfy public needs. f 2. Total Cost I A. Direct: There is a one-time cost of $36,500 to add the + eighty-nine spaces. B. Indirect: The additional maintenance of the new spaces will be minimal. It will be absorbed during normal park route maintenance. 3. Fending Source A. Funds: Park Acquisition and Development Unappropriated Fund Balance. B. Alternate Funding Source: General Fund -or it could be proposed for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Project Budget for FY 8 P:. C. History: The Park Acquisition and Development Fund is the usual and normal fund used to pay for park development projects, which includes items such as parking lots. 1399e JOE/lb _. .. �;crt�Ss7iANifC:aGs4"r�N!C�iiip0'�` . i 1 , r�li �' J /J�•6 REQUErz FOR CITY COUNCCACTION Date Septa �Oiw Submitted to: - 6L\ Honorable Mayor and City Council it ' �fl� Gi b t' t Charles W. Thompson, City Administ t _-•--•'" Submitted by: / Prepared by: Melvin M. Borman, Director, Community Service Subject; RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR PROPOSITION 18 GRANT FUNDS FOR CENTRAL PARK HANDICAPPED FISHING PIER AHD PLAY AREA PROJECT Consistent with Council Policy? ( ) Yes ( ( New Policy or Exception #► q Statement of issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE Funds are available through the Proposition 18 Grant Program for the development of parks within the community. RECOWENDATION Adopt resolution approving the City's application for Proposition 18 Grant funds to develop a handicapped fishing pier and play area at Talbert take in Huntington Central Park. ANALYSIS The Regional Competitive section of the Proposition 18 Grant Program is in its second year. The city wishes to apply for fends to develop a handicapped fishing pier and play area in Huntington Central Park. The fishing pier will be located at Talbert Lake and will have an access ramp for the disabled. Adjacent to the pier will be picnic tables, barbecues and children's play equipment that is also accessible to the disabled. The estimated cost of this project is 5100,000. No matching funds are required. The Community Services Commission recommended this pro ect at its August 14, 1985 meeting. The city trust provide a resolution to app y for these grant funds. FUNDIW SOURCE None. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS I. Aopty grant to Bolsa View Park renovation at a cost of $108,000. 2. Do not apply for funds under this grant program. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 2. Location Map 0106E/18 NO 4M ... ... ..1...)'... r rJ.w Pr:-w..::�.. `.J..•.. ..�..--......�..M.w�'Vh.h•�='w Y.R Rn..t['11.12�7i� REQUES f FOR CITY COUNCI ACToo N f r ^U D a+.r+r���r�6 1 8 t / site r cp Submittedto. The Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson) City Administra � prepared by: Vincent G. Moorhouse , Director, Community Services i Subject: Huntington Central Park Equestrian Trailr, li Statement of Issue, Raaammendation,Analysis, Funding Sourom,Alternative Actions, Attachrmnts: STATEMENT ON ISSUE There is a need to relocate the equestrian trails that were displaced by the new equestrian center development. A complete master plan of d and equestrian made on how much acreage in Central Park trails reArbeshould�be policy decisionsion master planned specifically for equine use. RECOMMENDATIONS j is fur HCF; 1. Prepare and adopt a master plan of equestrian trai 2. Authorize construction of a fenced equestrian tram. between the Frisbee gol.f area and Taylor Street to meet the temporary Heeds or equestrian use and relocate the displaced trails ; nd 3. Developme tFund ti-otconstructofencing foratheAequestrian at Development Fund recommended In 02 above. U . Authorize staff to prepare a proposed resolution establishing a horse license fee with revenue to be used for trail maintenance. ANALYSIS With the construction of the new equestrian center , part or the eques- trian trail established in 1973 by grant :unds wan displaced. Thle has created concern on the part of equestrians who have horses boarded outside the park boundary. They feel they are being denied access to j the new center and are losing riding trails within the park. With the growth occurring in the city , equestrians are faced with containment , ttat only on private property , but also un city-owned land. There is a need to master plan equestrian trails within UP and to establish a policy as to how much land '_s ,to be utilized in HCP for equine use. However, this MS1Z require some time and starf. reels that an immediate solution is needed. Also, a solution must be provided concerning the displacement or a portion of the trail by tile, equestrian center to in- sure that the equestrians are provided with an identifiable , quality trail of approximately lo,000 linear feet in length. Representatives of t%e equestrian community have also raised the iceue i that they are being dented a trail through the trees in the .new aquas' `-� Irian center which was the location of the old trail. They have reco:n-- ' I N��� .._ .1l..:' '-w-.P:r.nw.Lw*•........--.�..^.asgl/Vl i 1 9 •11 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION April 69 1983 � Page Two Sub3 : Huntington Central Park Equestrian Trails mended that the city restore the trail or construct a loop going com- pletely around the equestrian center. There have been numerous meet- ings with represent ativec of the equestrian community, the Mayor, members or the City Council, the City Administrator and Mr. Milligan , lessee of the equestrian ,renter. Twa basic alternatives have evolved from those meetings : ( 1) c;hall the cit;.* underwrite the lesnee ' s lia- bility for the temporary grail and require the lesuee to relinquish property frdm his lease, or (p) Shall the city develop a, new trail that would become part of the future master plan. Several exhibits are .included to explain the issues and delineate the area, in question. The Community Services Commission randewed this approved theter at its reeommendationsrafd regular meeting ref March 30, 1.83, staff. With an established trail system, there is a definite need to mn3ri- the railing as well as the trail. Since the trail system was origi - nally developed, it has deteriorated badly . The railing needs constant repair. The city has attempted to do this maintenance with volunteers . Presently, there is no funding for city farces to do ^ this work. It is, therefore , recommended that a minimum license fee be established for all horses boarded within the city of )Jun. tington Beach. Revenue from this license fee would be used so havelimplementcd for c- nance of the horse trails and fencing. b such a fee and if Council approves the recommendation, staff will investigate the procedures of those communities and incorporate them into a resolution for Council consideration. FUNDING SOURCE; Park Acquisition and Development Fund ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Do not replace the portion of trail displaced by the equestrian center. Retain only the trails which remain and construct no additional trails until park is master planned. 2 . Allow a temporary equestrian trail around the outside perimeter or the existing equestrian center with no trail or outside fence construction and accept additional liability to the city and to ` Better Built Enterprises . 3. Allow a temporary equestrian trail around the outside perimeter or the existing equestrian center and incur cyst of construction of a trail and fencing to separate Golden West Street , the Marion property and the Frisbee golf course . This alternative would require the city to accept additional liability as well an cover ,f the liability to Better Built Enterprises. r � 1. j REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION April 6, 1963 Page V.ree Subj : Huntington Central Park Equestrian Trails ATTACHMENTS 1. Department memo to the Community Services Commission outlininf the problem; 2 . Letter from Mr. Milligan, President or Better Built Enterprisen, stating his position as lessee of the equestrian center; 3. Pour maps : a) Original approved trail in MCP; b) Trail system as actually constructed and trails created and used by the equestrians, as well as established boundarlern. of the equestrian center; c) Plan A -- Staff's recoramendation for a volution to the problem with cost estimate; d) Plan B -- Proposal by equestrian community for relocating trail and cost estimate. VOM:cs I I I � r i _...___._._,_�..�.._....,.a....,�vrtra,•.': ;rj.-•,; ,,,,;-..�;a., ::,..'. . ,y ,. . .t : '^ .,..; `.. . ... _'.i7:i`v,",R"iG`A��,�+►A 1 /a COMMUNITY SERVICES 111 i 11\I.IIW a'N11 Departmental Memorandum To Community Services Qpmmisnion FRM Vincent 0. Moorh l* ox'M March 28, 1983 susxGT . Equestrian Use in Huntington Contral Park This year, the city entered into a long-term lease for a permanent , Cirnt- class equestrian center in Huntington Central Park. The old Feynolds ' stables, which encompassed ten acreu, were expanded by a 25-acre facility, totally fenced, which will include boarding facilities, horse rental service, show arena/salen pavilion, training rings and, yltimately, a clubhouse or restauranv.. The equestrian community In Huntington Beach is concerned that development of the new equestrian center has displaced a portion of the equestrian trail which was developed under a $10 ,000 federal grant in 1976. Stich grant required the city to build the trail and maintain it thereafter. Originally , members of Trail 100, an equestrian group in the city, vol- unteered to maintain the trail and, in fact, spent considerable time depositing tree chips and other material on the trail. For some years , the city attempted to keep the trail railing repaired; however, because the original railing was not properly constructed, it has deteriorated and undergone heavy vandalism. Trail 100 memberu also worked diligently to patrol the fence to keep four-wheelers out of the park. They did a good job. The city park ranger has continued with that patrolling and hart an extensive citation program to limit access to the trails by other than equestrians. With the development of the new equestrian center, it in logical at this time to master plan the equestrian trail system from the center to the ingress and egress points where the future linear park will connect as i well as with the equestrian estates being master planned to the south of the park. The majority of land in HCP did not have a master plan. An the Commission is aware, it has worked with staff and Council for almost , three years to identify the uses that were desired by the public for 11CP. This work entailed meetings and public hearings as well as a market analysin and master plan proposal by Ultrasystems. The proposal by ultra- systema was submitted to Council and reviewed on August 17, 1981. At that time, Council approved those portions of the proposal it desired and instructed staff to proceed to develop same . The equestrian center was one of those projects approved. This Council instruction resulted in a proposal from Better Built Enterprises to expand the city's equine facil- /— ity from 10 to 25 acres on property located adjacent to Golden Went Stree.l the A.C. Marion property to the south and the Frisbee golf course to the w' north. Council approved Better Built 's proposal and contract on Octo- ber 25, 1982 . The equestrian center is now approximately 50 percent com- +u1i041?l�=iri'::4 L•.rr..... ,....w.;•. . _...•c,.•., . .. , i•...,, ..�- .. .....,...• . n.:a..r.. ... .. .... .. .......u...urr-v-w..v..w�nrv.•v.ya.rr�w►.r..� Community Services Commission March 28, 1983 Page Two pleted . Construction has been held up due to the exceptionally rainy weather In the past few months . As mentioned, Trail 100's concerns are for the elimination of a portion of the grant funded trail. Equestrians with horses boarded outside the park are concerned that they are being denied access to the riding trail, In addition to what they feel is a reduction in total riding area. The equestrian community had thought that the trail was. to be a permanent i trail system in HCP. In discussing this matter with staff, it was deter- mined that the grant funded trail was never considered permanent t: cPnuae the land had never been master planned. Also, portions of the trail were on land privately owned by absentee landlords. The city is endeavoring to acquire these encyclopedia lots for inclusion in Central Park. however . until the land is totally acquired , the eq-jestrians are trespassing on private in—perty . For years , the equestrians have used the open space, which is mostly agricultural or oil producing, freely. With the i;rowt1i occurring in the city, the equestrians are being faced with contaimient ! of their activity and denial or riding an private property. Hence , their f justifiable concern as to the loss of trail in HCP. Obviously , there is a need for a master planned equestrians trail in HCP as we,.l as in the whole city . The Development Services staff have been working toward that goal for many years. The new equestrian center makes the attainment of that goal more necessary. In my meetings with the equestrians , the Mayor, City Council and City Administrator, the major issue was that the trail be maintained in the equestrian center where it had criginally been. On numerous occasions, I have attempted to e:;plain that Better Built Enterprises did not desire a public trail through the equestrian facility. Mr. Milligan, President i of Better Built , is providing a trail head for access from the center to the trail system in 11CP. However, he felt that there was consldevable liability created to his operation if a trail were created through the facility. I have attached a letter from Mr. Milligan outlining his con- cerns on the matter. In addition, in diaeussions with the City Risk Manager, Ivor 01tsham, he agrees that the city would be exposed to un- neceseary liability and cost to indemnify Better Built against all Inci- dents involving a trail through that property. It is Important for Commission and Council to understand that when the grunt funded trail was built, it was approximately 1D9350 feet long ae nn Identified trail on the map. Additionally , equestrians , motorcyclists and four-wheclern created )1 ,275 feet of additional trail by riding in open fteldn. Within the last four years , we have almost eliminated rour- whoclern and motorcyclists from the park through strict enforcement. The trails created by those vehicles have been disced but were eventually recreated by the equestrians. They are currently using an additional thirty acres of land which has not been master planned far use at this time. The use of that land is not an immediate problem. I raise this issue in order to inform Commission and Council that in the park , prior to deleting the portion of trail by the equestrian center development , _. there was a total of 14,625 feet of trail. The portion deleted totaled 5,120 feet, which leaves 9,505 Peet of remaini:ig, identifiable eqvestr'i�n trail and represents a reduction or approximately 845 feet from the total number of feet allocated in the original trail. Staff is recommend- ing replacement of approximately 1, 300 square feet of trail on the nor- Community Services Commission March 30, 1983 Page Three thern side or the equestrian center between the lake and the Frisbee golf course with a turn-around area near Golden West Street. Two F'riabee golf toes would have to be moved. We are proposing that this trail be totally fenced so as to contain the horses on the trail and prevent conflicts with other users of the park, not to mention keeping houses from bolting out onto Golder West Street . Mr. M:.11igan will rence one side and the city the other. If adopted, the staff recommendation would provide riders with a trail through extensive Eucalyptus ~Tees and various terrains and elevations , all enhanving the quality of the ride. This particular portion of the trail. could become a permanent leg of the system through the parlt . It would be an equitable solution in that it not only provides the lfore- mentioned amenities, but alt3o exceeds the number of feet in the nriginal trail. This recommendation certainly limits the city's liability, meets the needs of the equestrians , provides a permanent solution , and appelars to solve a lot of problems. The alternative suggested by the equestrians would create additional problems. They have Asked to be allowed to use ube street- right-or-wny in front of the equestrian facility and a ten-toot sLrip of the center' s property which is adjacent to A.C. Marion 's property. Mr. Plilligan questior-, allowing a trail across two roadways into his center and giving street cess to run-away horses . Also, i£ ttip trail were placed in the strc- t right--oi'-way in front of the center and adjoining the highway , . fencing would be required in addition to extensive movement of earth to create Tampa for a newly installed city water vault. Once Golds" West Street it improved , this portion of the trail would be deleted , thereby negating any investment made to create the trail. :+dditiona.11y, develop- ment; of the trail adjacent to the Marion property would be on a nevere grade , requiring a cut of the grade and installation or a retaining wall and fencing to separate the trail from the Marion property. This trail would empty out onto private property, oo encyclopedia lots which the city has not yet acquired. Unlecs the city is willing to accept the liability associated with this propose: as well as the cost of building the trail, staff Feels the equestrians' auggestion should be rejected. The city could allow horses to ride on the present grade and along the front of the center to make the loop, but, we honestly reel, the city would be accepting tremendous liability. This is a policy decision that has to be made. by Commission and Council. Starr reels that any future development of trails should be based on a master plan or concept acceptable to Commi.asion and Council . We anould not spend money on a project that will have %;o be redone in the future. Or additional enneern is that as development occurn around the park and the city continues to grow, we will be ,faced with a need to separate equestrian trails and use from other park Lsers for the sake or llahilt�y. VV1:ca i Attnchment : Eddie Milligan Letter ' V .a,n.♦.,.v a 1•.all.rr'ri.-rSk�^NU':C Mom" i r •1' Better Built Enterprises, Inc . E� �rlan Facillbas Deslgnted & Manufactured 701 W. CIENEGA AVE 6AN DIMAS, CALIFORNIA9177 (213) 3M-8575/331.321 MA1)599-583 March 21 , 1933 Mr. Vincent G. t•ioorhouse Director, Community Scrvi.ces City of Huntington Beach 2000 blaJn Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Fir. Moorhoxioc: I have met with the mayor, Cour,cilinan Fully , the City Admiv- i.strLtor, yourselft and some equestrians on numerouA occasions concerning the public riding trail. I have always stat:nd that I would cooperate with the City Council with regard to the release of a 10 ' strip of land alone the A.C. Marion property youth to Golden West Street. This proposed temporary riding trail will have, a tremendous adverse affect on our planned services and activities. we will no doubt have to reevaluate some of the city requirements in our contract. We do not feel we can, in good conscience , provide horses to the general public to ride on this trail, with built-in hazards to our hor.seu and riders. The trail , as planr:ed, will create two funnels to the fast moving, heavily travaled Golden West Street. it would be only a matter of time before: a horse woule. rtin away or btalt into oncoming traffic at either the north or south side of our property. The activity► in our riding arenas would be greatly affected by the constant disturbance of trail traffic. The distractions caused by riding up and Sown this trail would create hazardous conditions within our center. The liability of any lawsuit will have to be addressed by the city. The city will have to indemnify us and our operation against any lawsuit which may occur by the location of this temporary public trail. Sincerely, 4 r Better Built Rnterprises, Inc. Eddie J. Milligan President EJM:dj m PLAN A ---- Cost Estimate Plan A represents stnff' s proposal to construct a 1300 root equestrian trail as an extension to the present equestrian trail, adjacent to the FrInbee golf course and Huntington Lake on one side and the equestrian center on the other aide. This proposal will require city to fence only one side of the trail . Mr. Milligan will be fencing. the entire perimeter of the equestrian center. Note : These coats gape based on city forces doing all trail work. All fencing will be done by contract . Installation of 1300 feet of fencing and turn-around at Golden West Street . . . . . . . $ 73,563 Tractor work, miscellaneous work (moving � of sprinklei, heads , removal of trees and rolocatlon of two Frishee golf tees . . . . . . 2,500 TOTAL $10,063 i , , OWN PLAN 0 ---- Cost Estimate i Plan D represents construction of a temporary trail system which will include the same area as Plan A. with the exceptieri of the turn-around being eliminated, and will Also provide for the trail to move southerly in front of the equestrian center onto the undeveloped Golden West Street right:-of-way, to turn westerly onto a ten-foot easement to be granted by Better Built Enterprises and onto encyclopedia lots eventually connecting with the existing trail . Note : These costa are based on city forces doing all trail %►ork. All fencing will be done by contract. Installation of approximately 2700 feet of Fencing of the Frisbee golf course , Golden Went Street and A.C. Marion property . . . , . . 7 140960 Tractor and into cellaneoua work . . . . . . . . . 4 ,000 Liability coverage of }setter Built Enterprises (cost unknown at thin time) i i PLAN B-1 -• Cost Estimate Flan B-1 would fei.ce only Golden 4lest and the Frisbee golf course, leaving the Marion property open. Letts tractor work would be involved. Installation or fencing along Golden West . . . . . . . , . , . . , . . . , . , . , $ 3 ,300 Installation of fencing of the Frisbee golf course . . . . . . . 7 ,150 Tractor work 2,500 TOTArj 12 ,950 Tt BAST PHOTOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTION I POSSIBLE, DUE TO AGE AND CONDITION OF ORIGINAL DOC UMEN Z'S ilLl� , M110W Alum, ��Illlilllllllll(lllI I0 -=,II III IIII,INtIII III emu •IAllllillll�lllllllllll- �Il�ill�lllli�llllifl��lfl aiinunu ' l 1�; ^, Imo"♦ .•�' r cl V41a.L. i. ACTUAL TRAILS' . ' ~ Tv� uAND TRAILS , � EV ELOP E D COY �N �i,f llll - -- • `* lra!!'Yl�i;'u.'� r.Ea�r�:l. J+litY1 �Ie �AIA J� d 4% OTHERS is ri s im i CENTER�1 i t e l l*r . � M • Via .._... _. a .�1 - a QNi11AL MiltPLAN A Dot _ �WI ._ � � N t 1 ;ivy+ CF R j a' NUL -- i mt fc Opp i_ i DUES 'f?TA 4 CENTER ........... A, I 1 1 1 r • � �'�J,�'s'T�'�,o,� C�!/TF�f' .�iwD�Py' � , .'4/fir ,�►°o, 'D //�/�j� _y�..���,�(,r�. _ Olt � /'•��.� ' ' a � � � ',�\ti � . awl PLAN B kilts !MELT ���4q-�l�tj�+ r 1•- .r j V F 1 .• _ � _. tr•'l!!'~IL'•'i.':i.'� t.►:,'V1'A�;. !'1i1Y1 t I !�r Ogg I �kW_ EIur.srRIA4 CENTER oil i KU f 1 01 _ MJ CITY OF. HUNTINGTDN 8l1"M INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MAIi1N4ioM MKN To Charles W. Thompson From Dan T. Villella Cite Administrator Acting Chief of Administrative Service, Subject Construction of Fenced Date April 13, 1983 Equestrian Trail in Central i'ark FIR 1 83-44 In response to the Community Services rtepar;ment, a Financial Impact Report has been prepared and submitted relative: to the proposed construction of a fenced equestrian trail in Huntington Central Park. It has been estimated that an appropriation of $10,000 would he adequate for this project. Sufficient funds Are availablo in previously anproved projects that will not be started prior to the beginning of the next fiscal year. Dan T. Villelle Actinq Chief of Administrative Sarviee DTV!AR/cq tit CITY OF. HUNTINGTO4 BEACH FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT Project Name Constructipn of Feted Enucstrian .Trat) in HCP Description Requested funding for this project. 1. DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 . 1 One-Time Costs "110 Furn. , racil AcquIsItIcm Constructlon ties E ul men Other Total Cost 10,000 10.000 1.2 Recurring Annual Casts 'Addit ona ater a s t uts de Pa al 1 Peraonne) Syg2lips S rvt s Rev n T 1 Cost 1.3 Repleca+went/ftennaal Costs NIA 2. INDIRECT COS:'S Loss of earning capability due to expenditure of funds . r Financial Impact Raport Page 7 3. NOW-DOLLAR COSTS I , 4. NENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT Construction of the fenced equestrian trail betvicen the Frisbee golf area and Taylor Street, as recontended by staff, will irmet the temporary needs -of equestrian use and relocate the former trails that were displaced by the recent__equestrian ,yam• r.r.r r center development. 5, PROJECT USAGE Qa I 1)&A ' b. EXPENDITURE TIMING Subsequent to City Council approval. •...+..�.+.�.�rr+++.r.+rr wrrrr r.er..w.+wrr.r 7. tOST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PAOJEGT CltX =—etain the option of not replacing any portion of displaced trail or of ally iinga temporary equestrian trail around the outside perimeter of the existing �V =4 er as-noted by the requesting source in the attached correspondence. 01".5 {1 i '0� REQUEb r FOR CITY COUNCiL. ACTION Date _ April ti , 198A SubrtttttWto-, The Honorable Mayor and City Council Submirnd by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Ct�� Pr"redby: Melvin 14. Bowmai:, Acting Director, Community Scrfic Subled; HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK SPORTS COMB,i:JC Stateerwnt cf Issue, Reoomrnendation, Analysis, Funding Sourco,Alternative Actions, Attschmsnts: Cku STA'1'FMENT Ole' ISSUE City Council directed t;taff and the Community Services Commistlori to reaearch alternative rites within Huntington Central Park for develop- ment of a sports Yield complex. RECOMMENDATION Authorize development of four ballfleld:3 an the city landfill property (Exhibit A ) when :"ands and Orange County property become rrvtti l able in accordance with the Capital Improvement Probrai... ANALYSIS At, a Study necalon on June 20, 1983, Council was presented n conceptual plan for the development of four ballfieldu within Central Turk on the west side of Ooldenwest and Talbert. At the conclusion of the study session, Council instructed staft' to coordinate with the Community Servlees Commission to research alternative sites for the ballficld complex. Stuff directed they city' s contract landscape architect: to provide conceptual plan: for ballfield development within the city landfill area of Central Parh. It was determined that four ballfields as indicated in Exhibit A would be the most suitable ni.te.` . The Com- munity Service: Commission on March 111 , 1984 approved Exhibit A and recommended Council approval of same. Estimated development cost for Exhibit A development its $1 .23 million. Tice Comntisslon indicated that If Exhibit A iv, not fen.sible, Exhibit B development would be ita second f choice, that is , three bnllt'ields with lights at an estimated cost of $891 ,000. Exhibit C was developed by staff' as another alternative site. � It would include two ballfields on the west side of Goldenwest adjacent to Talbert With backstops, limited bleachers and no lighting. The cost Is estimated at $200,000 per field. larking lot , street, improvements and slenal modification would cost an additional $500,000. MNDTNG SOURCE Park Acquisition and Development Fund. ALTERNATIVE ACTtONS I. Exhibit A development ; j 2. Exhibit C development; 3. Modify the number of ballfields in Exhibit A or the other exhibits! ! no stet REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Apri i 4, igh Pnge Two Subj : Huntington Central Park Sports Complex 14 . Do not', develop ballf ields in Centred Park. A'ITACILMENTS Exhibits A, B, and C Council meeting minutes of June 20, 1984 ( Study Session) MMB:co r ram. �L �j f COLD `RWL='S T s 1 LIBRARY ESTIMATED FAPFKSFS PARKING Ftelds $ 300,000 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE---, 4G0 L+ehts 280,000 Parking 150,000 _.�............�............ TOTAL $1, 230,000 Fl 1 I m FUTURE PROPERTY LINE M l� SAI.i. FIELDS _. . -4 PARKING m W2 I t� EXHIBI-T I If (( Lit3RARY ESTIMATED EXPENSES NARKItfCi EXISTING PROPER" LINE-- 7 470 L i Lights ?;600,000 . l..ig � 210,000 1 Parking 81 .000 _�._._._...._....,....._.....�. ._._,_ TOT,',!, $891 ,000 � 1 © n,ALL FIELDS im i V FUTURE PROPERTY IANE �b `m •, EXHIBIT B EXISl HG TREE LINE lep VUTURE. IL a \ Y.MC.A. BALL FIELD BALL FIELD GOL LIBRARY I k;STIMA7.'L�U i:XPk;lia?�:S FA IOn $!!UO,otjO St rot, "illmill Mod IVIc tit iont, 440,1300 I� I'll t M inG o0_000 'rOTA1. $9UC?,0OU f � t I j� rn � •1 GOTHARD ST._ _EXHIBIT � ell) co R QU S t" FOR CITY COUNCILQTI01q ' Date April 11,1.28 Submitisd to: The Honorable Mnynr and C i V Council Submitted by: Charles W . 'Nomp:nnn, City Administrnto94/ Pr;paredby: Melvin M. Boviman, Actity, Di actor, Community Servic�, Sub)ect: HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PAR'{, HEST 13OUNDARY TRUNK SEWER, PROPERTY ACQUISITION; 01C-606 Statement of laue, Rwimmendatien, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Mtachments- STATFAF,NT OF ISSUE ; Iri order to r_nnstruct thy: proposed alignment of the Heat boundary trunit newer through Huntington Central Park, five encyclopedia lots need to be acquired through condemnatlon. RECO MENDATION Approve the attached Res-:,lutfvn of deed and Necessity to initiate condemnation proceedinr,r, to acquire lot., 110-182-11 ; 110-iB-o6 ; 110-185-08; 110-18; 14 ; and 110-165-15 for a total coat of $649500. A14ALYSIS In order for cone true, ton of the trunk sewer to take place es scheduled early this year, five encyclopedia leas must be acquired by the city. These lut,.9 are within the boundary of Huntington Central Park and were scheduled for purchase at a future data an parkland. The alignment of the trunk sewer maken it, neeennn.ry to acquire the lotf now. The Administrative Services Department Ma made tin effo-t to acquire -subject lots at the-ir apprairied vr►lue, but has been unable: tri do so. FUNDING SOUHM' Park Acqulsit!on and Development Unencumbered Fund Bal.nrice , 1,64,500. AL,TEANATIVE ACTIONS Postpone purchase of the encyclopedia logs and -newer trunk develop- ment until further direction by Council . ATTACHMENTS Reaolution of deed and Pecesnity /cs Poo 4MI `1 e7 Ir17'tiR {\►�, Superior Court uY cl�Y uti arnr► ��.Z•gi(?V � STATC OF C/.1.IF'ORNiA In still for lheCoun!yof Orstip er�rarrwwssrwrraas '� y Li,l'.R r ,t•r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHr ,rrtlQn�d>s rty���f.t�ATION�„�,,,� CITY CLERK PUBLIC HEARING 'f+bfr�ie�cpfMlt n At~L fMILMb't1T P�R01'ARY fsUtcr><Calirmnia )ts t)�jry� �ItRlt>rtlR)tott�'►r.>,7trw ' G►unty to f)rartge ) OIMp dN t'resd•rt tMs per Carsapl Jf tfrs R I TA J. R I CHTERPOW�� r 1sAYai .ieerbwa•a w saat That I am and at all times hr►ein mentioned was is ritiren of 1 pa the unikvl Staten,over the ARrr of twenty-one years,And that I �`Aew`t��"�r�w'ar ' am not a patty to,ring,in(err.itti in the ataiv emitittl m rtier; kw tl• �llit,k's'per Map that 1 Am the principal clerk of the printer of tr,e ��tf Wa (log HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REVIEW LA( a newspaper of generc!-irndstfnn,puLlfslrtrl fn the Cfty of N"IR��Peerair el �'� ��w�st. 4 HUNTINGTON ILEACH i„+t ut '�i►lRlrtlbaawa rw• ttlfW i pot 9L M/r.in.- Ccunty 4 OrAnce'nne which newrlalwt it puhli.hed for 1he J.a ledrds r1 o ap t'ansr, di".mtntstion of lixal news and intrlligence of a FPn•tnl r!1nr,u• �+ wt, and whlrh nrwrpnper at r11 litres hfrein wroth+reed hod err 14tjyt�sAINPerwtlr,..1 and still his a Nina fide nuharription fit(o/pAYirA�uh+f rib tww et., lwlM 1. 1d Mrwrthar and Yrhith newspaper has been eltAblitited, printed And pule u . Ivsn M Ovits cav+ty, j h4eil at rripster inorrvols In the said Cem;nly of Otanr;o fr,r r t.ita6sf hrstlfa , t+tes rw.nled prriul eerenlin r e year, that the tin+ire, art µhuh the t4 i t is Al user 1 M %kows Roo^ onsesed is a prio:cd n+py,hits txen put,lislvd in the r►tulrr 11orru+b4oI s1v'(9l4.IeN and entire Issue t+f said aewsprp•r,anti not in nny nnl+rl►meat A44 nll Wm awt►d Da A.. Ih•rtur,on the following date•,to wit. . `!+a '°'t ri1'"'"'rt A dNec�a1 of 1Lr�pcTerty w h sr � 4444 tv wrree"li' r is e►,fee in ibr 0'r t�vl L41 Gr)l7rk "fits trios Y tstM is""t seal 1~ s re tie�.�nsrtea t TMt tM F.Mw fwrvtl J+d n+cw• MARCH 29t 1984 d ,AeA%a c re The to k�iKeA is A wr+as tis tiro rr.t i assptAft W iA ft P.U*o PUNK 1-1 , • srd II"lift w4wr. ((rr1 11s4 /rwm7 iarnlwt.rr.J 1 eerti( 'ar d-Clare)unrlrr Y perjury ardaswttMtrsrrtWdlseae..aryGv y pen,tit of rer•urr that t'ne fr rr►,o• Ils�egr�ari Ing it ttv�sN!cv!rrrl. t11J C..ea►ft ionto4truw LM to 01,41W e�( Jre�Hv is repave a U•esa a..................tI. ARPF?iGRDV.E............ rr,r�e f'�air,.°it 1r+.t it f�l w 2+eg,a we hoer.Yt�iin Is M. t Of n"ew tArrnrflst a 1r�Yts •t;tin CRiifu rn,thi .. 9 t!r w1w lien terra e+ac'.�f moo &Aft Mi M It Is 1 Ise Nid III „ � -✓f' 1' ye+br irMasq MA AeN►Is tsl,tDl r+l lrl 1 .....: .Rita J. R, . .Richter e r v tl►Y�i. r c"ie+�:�aro u`t: R a Signature whiten Waste 4164�6R'"CisiWft i tdds rs1:M It Y"as alit rw r wntl-e ,+.Iriat w -111AtY fN+.n ny►it { /te(� �>.{, gnrr�•ewr+Y�is ad�ar.�,'t�M+/ aai►.. uw Car f ho IY'e1�M var bo braidbe blivil pm s 14 s MIN, end sidmowi Wier der to e16 wow.}sir"s effly��D"14." Mh Ned�feaRkv AVI"YY'f hr IM Mrnl t nr!r►n 11Prlt e•if 11h a1a.1m Arrr IK vr.;d..e1►t•Iq 11+s� r11 r of Ira.nrelaa N•u a; heir Mot 49.Net r A_r-t_Folger. , pep,._City_Attorney- nt,t►t----3/23/84 _____ --_,.Attached ..is. a Legal -riot-ice that Cheryl SaLas_and __I_put_together._ Tlease. add....subtract-or h-whatt_.you_ _...__want._but please-get.-it-back..tu_me in._time_tu_publ.ish_ --for-the 4/16/84 meeting__ _. ._...___ 1 f .-A.)-Now many times to .be publ i sheds___� I must have the finished copy to_give_to the N8 ! -Independenit by April 2 (Monday) for publication on April 5, which will be lWayxx 10 days notice. 2F„ I think it should be la days because of the notice that --is-going to the -property-owners,-•-If-so,-get-i-t-back-- to nre by AFw44 23rd (Monday) ��t{/� �Con►iie"Clerk's 4ffficeii5a0S Duty `,t• r I. 45 465 Slr►p►rerS t ArtD 1�,+r,Ctt.Crr► tY7fC r,k Pat ISO I_,UU, rur t wql .1 tlturrdtry w,iN rlr r � i• f ' t A•' jr 3 4 tgr"+C4 r4p"-t i;L' �keArIr r NQTIGE OF- a. ENTIC N TO n QUIR _PROPUly ;;,jLF,=ENT 9OnOMAU TO ALL INTERESTED PROPERTY OWNERS: YOU ARE IIEREBY NOTIFIED that pursuant to the QjdA bP Gives Progedurt Section 1245 .235, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach intends to adolst a resolution to commence eminent domain proceedings 1:o acquire. , under Government Code Section 37350.5, for put,lic parts: purposes, the Collowing described real property in the city of Huntington Beach: Lot 47 of Tract No. 8, ats per Up thereof, recorded in Book 91 page 7 of Miscellaneous Maps, re,-,orda of Orange County, California. Lot 18 of Tract No . 45, an shorn on a map recorded in Book 9, page 34, Miscellaneous Maps , recerds of Orange County, California. Lot 11 of Tract No . 45, as she • on a clap recorded in Book 9, page 34, Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orangti County, California . Lot 56 of Tract No . 81 an per map thereof recorded ir. Book 90 pa go 7 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California . Lot 55 of Tract 8, as per Map recorded in Book 9 at page 7 of Miscell;,neoua Map-s, 1 Records of Orange County, California. � lhtha �Ot,�te� �oK�h e�' �+l�s A�l�,rs '�t4�+��r► �dwN�AS��I�n�"�+. ', -. A diagram of. the pro arty to be acquired by i rlA� 1, . �+►o *4 0Ittor Flo +*64y cm*kf condemnation i"Aattached--heretre„ You have a right to appear and be heard on the following matters: � o A .. 11 (a ) That the public interest and necessity require this project ; (b) The proposed project as planned is located in a manner that will be the most compatibAe with the greatest public good and the least private injury ; (a) That the property described above and sought to be acquired is necessary for the proposed proJeat. The City Council will consider the resolution of neces it to acquire the property by eminent domain at the �.. ►�. (o,,N��� C1,r•,,q a° M,�a�+�s saoN �MwOw poss,�'� regular COunC mee in , mt 2000 Mxin Street, Huntington Beach. You may appear and be heard at that time relntive to the matters set forth in (a) , (b) and (e) above, by tiling a written request to be heard with the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach , CA 92648, within fifteen ( 1!i) days arter mailing of this notice . IS' you do not file a written request to appear within fifteen 0 5) days of the: mailing of this notice , the City Council is not required to afford you the opportunity to appear and be heard in thin matter . If you need additional inrorciation on this mhtter C,4 j o� H10�4101-464 f4f you may contact Dan nrennan , Real Property Agent, at (714) 536-5544 . w 2 - CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH W.n►Id tffyAltsrnrY REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES ca"ary ccity ity AcIffilMark 11trdlar doldonrrd 100"Mrk Mil FKM1WGii]rl elA(M Lssia ripvw r, ts ey aad.s►n.►+s i•Ic��;. Z .' , ) 't'i� !�1iI'r 1.•n�i •'�; T'ltbt.3.^ Works INSTAUCTIot. ;: File request Iin the City Attarnty's Office at soon as possible.Print or type fasts nel.a wy for City Attorney.Out• line briefly reo•.ant for tht tequett,Attach sit information and exhibits pertinent to the subjW." Type of LmW Service Rw w"itd: 1 1 Ordinance l 1 Imutsnee f ! Other M Flwoiution ( l Bonds { ) ContreetlAq►een►ent I 1 Opinion All ekhlbits mutt be stuehed,or MIS fNW"t will be retuinod to you. ! 1 Exhibite Attached 'thin .in r rrnumst; to hm,,•r• n "norlolution nr T,en►l" nrepnred for the condi'matton of "Fnuvr3nt-c.+3r- T.rts" north of r1lis Avonut% hfytwern };dwitr4o anti Colelenwent !,Lrr:-tr as Mim-ii nit the atttiched rmp. The Admini.f;trrlt3.ve seruiron nrttt. •het:= 7tndr_ an effort to Acquire the bees in quontion .it thoir m- rnirntl v:n)ue, but have hann unable to tic go. In order for the City Lo rrrcred with the conRtruction Of. thi VMmit nnundary Trunk ctn rr!Iif t1ttlr%, condemnation proccedingn j Mhott.ld be initiated as noon n.n .posS1b1e . i . i i • 1 t 1 I{ 1 if kw e710wM1.alethn, if not/o�tbe►►xii ddbn,dgfrd e>onytidtion dra liflnvlese: AV",sstadtilw Mov. 7.:, 1 n Ili i .io t�rrr r i REQUES f FOR CITY COUNCIL. ACTION Dias __,r___,__Njate,,p.20, 19E3 . Submitted to: lionorable Mayor and City Council Submitted br: Charles w. 'E'hompsou, City Administrator CaA Prrparwa by: Melvin bt. Bownian, Acting Director, Commuoity Service $ublect: IIUNT[NG'fON CENTRAL PARK EQUf Rt'KIAN '1'RA(l. MASTER PLAN ` -B ort� `ac�ia.� •>� I�i�•o b�l+��1�i✓3 �. d� somement of to Reaamte3endatIon, Analytic, Funding Source,Attetnative Actions, Attachment3:� STATEMENT OF MUE: ere is a nee Tor a master planned equestrian trail in Huntington Central Park that would be compatible with anticipated park uses. RECOMMENDAT(ONt Ajp-WnAlternatives "A" and "E"of the master plan for the equestrian trail systuin in Huntington Central Park and develop the trail In accordance, with the yearly revised Capital Improvement Program as approved by the City Council. Estimated cost for grading and fenaingt $163,000. ti ANALYSIS: i AM Xj Ti 18, 1963 meeting, the City Council authorized staff to prepare a master plan of equestrian traits for Huntington Central Perk. Staff contacted Cardoza Dll.allo Harrington, , City's contracted landscape architects, to master plan the equestrian trail utilizing the system that presently exists; and, to provide alternatives. On March 90 19840 City staff met with Equestrian Trails, Inc. President, June Transue and Trail Coordinator, Mary Bell, to discuss the alternatives proposed by staff and the landso" � architect. The cquestrian representative:( Indicated that their organization would ba satisfied wlth Alternatives "A"and "E''. They requested three it©ins: 1) A connection to the Ltnoar Park from the equ !3trIan trail; 2) AE facilities In the Huntington Central Park be compatible; and 3) 11* trail hc.., a "permanent" system. These three issues would be met under Alternatives "A"and W. 'They also Indicated that the, view points or rest areas Included by the )andscape3 architect should be omitted as the trail if, riot long enough to warrant such areas. 'rho rest areas might also attract the genera) public who would Impact the arch and create sarety hazardu for ti►e people on foot hnd on horseback. Taking the trail into and through the more activo areas (Alternatives "13" and "C") by the picnic shelter, snack bar and open play areas was a concern of staff and Commission. i Potential problems would be cmated by having the general public recreate In such close proximity to the horse trail. Also, problems could be anticipated with children running through the trail or climbing or sitting on the fence. 11in area would be impacted by too many diverse groups with potential hazards to all. i The Nature Center hss averaged over 20,000 visitor s in the past two years. Looping the i equestrian trail around that facility (A1ternativc "i.") would creme a distraction from Its } Intended purpose. Horses and Nature Center groups would not be compatible. A »umber of 4 trees dnd shruos would have to be eliminated, especially on the north side where extensive planting has been done for screening pur?osex Several asphalt paths used by pedestrians, bicyclists and service vehicles Intersect the proposed trail system, thereby creating a hazard for the equestrians. NO 4 Ma RCA/MUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK EQUFSTRIAN TRAIL MASTER PLAN Mstrah 20, 1984 Pa;;e Two Alternative "A" encompasses the pathr. of the axisting trail system In an altered double lClop configuration that passes through two major olmervatlon areas, the Midd<.n Top and Huntington Lake. It totals approximately 1,100 linear feet. Alternative "E"' would bu constructed when and if the temporary trait along Goldenwest and the A.C. Marion property has been removed. This alternative Is 1,J00 linear feat In length, which would taring the total trail to more titan the agreed upon 11,000 Net. On March 14, 1984, the Community&arvices Commission viewed the plans,and discussed the entire equestrian trail master plan in detail. The Commission recommended City Council appiroval of Alternatives Ilk" and "E" with the rest areas to be eliminated from the plan. FUNDING SOURCF.- Vilrlc aqua Mown and Development Fund. ALTERNATi'vE AC'10H3: T.Thom a` recent artdrnative or alternatives. 2. T10 iwt master plan the equestrian trail at this time. ATTACWMBtIT: r7llamfi 14,T§04 Community Services Commission Minutes. 2. fluntingto:n Central Parts Equestrian Trail Study. CWTJMMHJJHWgs 04?98 �Y��•• •1' vMM1'r.�. r--.....+.r.�.rw.,...Nti.... ,. ..., n .l'.. ... . .♦..,.� •, nY. .w lNl•1. krwwwMlYMli y�y ' j EXCERPTS - COMMU141TY SERVICES COMMISSION REGULAR AIEEVNG - MARCH 14, 1984 ): UE,STRIAN TRAIL FIUNTING-TON CENTRAL PARK Staffpresented the basic drat master plan of the Huntington Central Park equestrian trail to the Commission. The following niturnatives were designated on the plan: Alternative A - The basic plan encompasses approximately 11,000 linear feet In an altered double loop eonfigaration passing through two major observation areas, the j Midden Top and lluntington Lake. Graded IV A]. preliminary cost is $55,000. Alternative B - Extends the system an additional 2,600 linear feet; winds through the existing pine buffer edge at the west side of the active use areas to the Nature Center. The trail also extends to a hitching post area near "Breakfast in the Park", allowing equestrians the opportunity to ride and dine. Graded Trail preliminary cast Is $13,000. Alternative C - Provides for a 1,700 linear toot extension, completing the loop back along the linear edge of the bluff at Goldenwest; providing a very naturalistic experience. Graded Trail preliminary cost is $9,000. Alternative U - Wraps completely around the Nature Center. Staff Ceels this would also create prohlems with the location since it would p;o around the Nature Center and would involve a lot of modifications to that area. Graded 7Ytt(L preliminary cyst !s $18,000. Alternative E When and If the tornporary trail along Goldenwest and A.C. Marion's property has been removed, this alternative offers a 11000 linear t »t line to the Initial system. The trail currently constructed along Taylor Street could remain with a trail turnaround at Goldenwest. Graded Trail preliminary cost Is $6,000. 'file Trail 100 group requested the following three Items be considered In the equestrian trail proponel: 1. A connection to the Linear Park from the equestrian trail. 2. That all fac;lities In :he park be compatible. 3. That the trail be a "permanent"system. diary Sell, Trail 100 representative, stated the group Is In suplwrt of Alternatives A and R. They are concerned about maintenance costs and request that "elaborate facilities" not be In the trail system so that maintenance costs could be kept to a minimum. Staff felt the rest areas delineated on the master plan ,mould ba removed, thereby saving aofateueticn and maintenance cost3. When the ten foot cerement Is taken with tho widening of Goldenwest Street, the trail along Goldenwest (across from the Mushroom Farm) wW be removed. Staff Informed Commission that the equestrian licensing fee ordinance Is on the next Council Agenda if approved, the ordinance will institute a $25 license fee for equine. i 0470e Tile trails will be open for cross-country meets sponnered by the high school districts and other non-equine activities. BETTY KENNEDY asked where the public would be allowed to gain access to the trail system. Daryl Smith stated that the horses would have to be unloaded at the stable on Ellis, from A.C. MarIon's property or on Milligan's pror,)erty. Maybe the City should consider an unloading lot for the public to drop off horses. NORMA VANDER MOLEN felt the facility is not really a "publin" facility and has a "problem" with the fact that the: facility is not more available to tine public. TOM COOPER expressed concern about the access to the Linear Park. Ile Is concerned that there might be an exorbitant construction cost for this access. Ile felt that before he could endorse the master plan, he would need to know what the cost would be for thwt access, Staff feels the access would be some typo of overpass. GENE FARRELL stated that he would not support the master plan unless the public has aeons to the trail. Ile felt there should be some type of guarantee on the City's part, ttat the "public" can awe the equestrian trail. NORMA VANDER MOLEN felt the license fee should include residents and nonres1.dents. She is concerned that ";residents" will be the only ones supporting the maintenance of the trail Staff stated the equine ordinance will be controlled by stable owners and collected by the stable ownars only for those horses boarded within the nity limits �. After lengthy discussion, the following action was taken: MOTION: RIVERA MOVED, SECONDED BY DYSINGER, TuE COMMUNITY SERVICES MOM3310H RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF THE HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK EQUESTRIAN TRAIL DRAFT MAS'rElt PLAN ALTERNATIVES "A" AND "E" WITH THE REST AREAS BEING DELETED. MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: COOPER, DYSINGER, KENNEDY, OSNESS, RIVERA, VANDER NIOLEN NOESt FARRELL, .-IIOS'r A039147% BLANKINSHIP, GIESE, JENSEN. ASSENTIONs NONE TOM COOPER requested Commission's concerns be for:varded to we City Council in writing, attached to tho RCA. i i i 04700 001-*� -,� ;Evl�r�ta•cd e � REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION a S80-6 Dat• Mkt rah ?o. i,��J84 Submhtsd to: Honorable Mayor and City Co!incil ` submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator I Prepaivd by: Melvin M. Dowman, Acting Director, Community Service�� Subject: IIUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK EQUESTRIAN TRAIL MASTER Pi,AN %flament of two, R*xw*rendation,Analysls,Funding Source,Alternot;e•Aetkera, Attarhnmh: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Tfiert-5 a need or a master planned equestrian trail in Huntington Central park that would b• compatible with anticipated park uses. RECOMMENDATiONt Apprnve Alternatives "A"acid "E" of the master plan for the equestrian trail system in Huntington Central Park ar d develop the trail in accordance with the-yearlyfw#aed-Cffpdtai.--y its-apfisvrrd�ii�s-Ce+ir►c.�1r1.--�atttt�t�d'Corst l�or$rsdin�r and ANALYSIS: t its Ap-r 1 18, 1983 meeting, the City Council autnotlzed staff to prepare a master plan of equestrian trails for Huntington Central Park. Staff contacted CaKloza DILalio Harrington, City's contracted landscape architects, to master plan the equestrian trail utilizing the system that prow-ntly existsl and, to provide alternatives. On Math 9, 1964, City ataff met with Equestrian 'hails, Inc. President, June Traroue and Teall Coordinator, Mary Hell, to discuss the alternatives proposed by staff and the landscape architect. no equestrian representatives indicated that their organization would be satisfied i with Alternatives "A"and "B". They requested three Itemst 1) A connection to the Linear Park from the equestrian trail; 2) All facilities in the Huntington Central Park be compatible; aiad 3)The trail be a "permanent" system. These three issues would be met under Alternatives "A" and "E". They also indicated that the view points or rest areas Included by the landscape architect should be omitted as the trail Is not long enough to warrant such arena. The rest areas might also attract the general public who would impact the area and create aofety haseards for the people on foot and on horseback. Taking the trail into and through the more active areas (Alternatives "H" and "C") by the plenle shelter, smack beer and open play areas was t: concern of staff and Commission. Potential problems would to created by having the general public recreate in such close proximity to the horse trail. Also, problc:rna could be anticipated wit), children running through the trail cc climbing or sitting on the fence. 17te area would be impacted by too many diverse groups with potential hazards to all. The Nature Center has averaged over 2^,000 visitors in the past two years. Looping the" equestrian trail around that facility (Alternative I'D") would create a distraction front its Intended purpose. Horses and Nature Center groups would not be compatible. A number of trees and shrubs would have to be eliminated, especially on the north side where extensive planting has been done for screening purposes. Several asphalt ,baths used by pe-dratrians, bieyclista and service vehicles intersect the peopmed trail system, thereby creating a hazard for the etquestriart9. ►- •., i 1 r . RCAIHUNTINGTO14 CENTRAL PARK EQUESTRIAN TRAIL MASTER PLAN { Mamc:h 20, 1 904 Page Two Alternative "A"encompames the imths of the existing trail system :n an altered double loore configuration that passes through two major observatiorl, areas, the Midden Top and Hunttilgton LAker It totals approximately 1,100 linear feet. Alternative "E" would be constru=ted when j and if the temporary trail along Goldenwest and the A.C. Marion property has been removed. I Ws alternative is 1,10 linear (cet in length, which would bring the tutal trail to more than thu agreed upon 11,D00 feet. On March 14, 19840 the Community Services CorWniaslon viewed the plans and discussed the entire equestrian trail master plan in detail. 11 i Commission recommended City Council enroval of Alternatives "A"and "E" with the rest areas to be eliminated from the plan. PUKDING SOURCE: Pik r equM(Ion snd Developmtnt Fund. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: l n erent a ernative or alternatives. J 2. Do not master plan the equestrian trail at thin time. ATTACHMENT% T: 140 14, n84 Community Services Commic.-don Minutes. 2. Hunti%ton Central Park Equestrian Trail Study. i cwr/mma1d6&cgs y . 047lie i i } f i i I i r I r f r EXCIRP71 - COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING? - MARCH 14, 1984 EQUESTRIAN TRAIL NUN NGTON CENTRAL PARK Staff presented the basic draft master plan of the untington Central Park equestrian troll to the Commission. The following alternatives were designated on the plan: Alternative A - The basic plan encompasses approximately 11,000 linear feet in an altered double loop configuration parsing through two major odservatlon areas+ the Midden Top and Huntington Loke. Graded Trail preliminary cwt Is $551000. Alternative 0 - Extends the system an additional 2,600 linear feet; wimis through the existing pine buffer edge at the west stdr6f the active use areas to the Nature Center. The trail also extends to a hitching poet area near "Breakfast in the Park", allowing equestrians the opportunity to ride and dine. Graded TraU preliminary cost is $1 3,000. Alternative C - Provides for a 1,700 linear foot extension, completing the loop baek along the limier edge of the bluff at Goldenwestf providing a very naturalistic experience. Graded lVaU preliminary cost is St+,000. Altermtive D - Wraps completely around the Nature Center. Staff feals this would also create problems with the location since it would go around the liature Cana:+ and would involve a lot of modifications to that area. Graded Trail preUminary coat is$I It 000. Alternative Zt- When and if the temporary trait along G7oldenwest and A.C. Marion's • property I= been removed, this alternative offers a 1,000 linear 'loot line to the Initial system. The trail currently aonatructed along Taylor Street could remain with a trail tunwround at Goldenwat. Graded Trail preliminary cost Is 6%000. no Vail 100 iv* rv*mted the following three Items be considered In the equestrian trail prvpoeah 1. A eomwtion to the Liar Park from the equestrian trail. y. That all faeiUties in the park be compatible. 8. That the tr*U be a "permanent" ..^,ystem. May Be14 71rail 100 rapresentative, stated they group Is in support of hlternatives A and I. They am concerned about maintenance coots and request .that "elaborate facilities" not be in the trail system so that maintenance costs could be kept to a minimum. Staff felt the rest areas delineated on the master plan should be removed, thereby saving eorrtruetion and maintenance coats. When the ten foot easement Is taken with the widening of Goldenwest Street# the: tract alw* Goldenwest (soma, from the Mushroom Farm) will be removed. Staff informed Crammimion that the equestrian licensing fee ordinance W an the next Council agenda. It approved, the ordinance will Institute a 025 lieeone fee for equine. 04 7rle 1 The trails will be open for crr.sa-country meets sponsored by the high school districts and other non-equine activities. BETTY KENNEDY asked where the public would be allowed to gain access to the trail system, Daryl Smith stated That the hone would have to be unloaded at the stable oil E1114 brim A.C. Marion's property or on Milllgan's property. Mayne the City should eoro!f)er• an unloading lot few the public to &cp off honwe. NOR.MA VANDER MOLEN felt the facility is not rawly a "Emblic" facility and has a "preblesn" with the toot that the facility Is not more available to the public. ! TOM COOPER expressed concern about the access to the. Linear Paris, He Is Concerned that there might be an exartsltant corrstroction oast for this aceasa. He felt that before he could endorse the master plant he would natddu know what the cost would be for that assess, Staff ferils the access would be some type of ovrfipaas. GENE FARRELL stated that he would not support the master plan unless the public has seem to the trail. He fell. there should be some type of guarantee, on the City's patio that the "public" C*n use tlwi equat6an trail. NORMA VANDER NOLEN felt the 11cerat fee should Include teoidenty and nonresidents. Shis its amearried that "residents" wlU be, tiwe only onas aupportin` than rnaintename, of trw trail. Staff stated the equine ordinance: will be controlled by stable owners and collected by ttta stable +awners only for thosm hamas brArdrad within the cialimita: After lengthy discunslon, the fallowing uction wu Ukent MOTION: RIVSRA MOVED, SECONDED BY DYMNGElt, THE COMMUNITY SERVICES I V5VW iDN RECONNEIND ADOP-'ION OF THE HUNnma-rom CENTRAL P11R9 EQUEZSTPJAN TRAIL DRA r r MA'ST'dlti PLAN hLTERNATIVES "A" AND "E", rNITH 'rHB REST AREAS BEING DELETED. MC41ON CI\RRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTEr AYSSs COOPER, DYFINGFtR, KENNEDY, OSNESS, RIVERA, VANDER MOL11N NOBS: FARRELL9 FROST A031141e SLANKiNEH1P, GIES13, JENSEN. I ABORNTIONt NONE TOAD COOPER requeeted Commission's eaxwterns be fixlwarded to the City t" anal3 in writing, attacW to tiro RCA. 1 wroe COMM LWTY -WRYICES OWA RTkWJkff PARK ACOMITI(X4 AND ISEVELOPM00 ESTIM ATIM W.0140 E Fiscai Yew I M194- 198 BO, Funan�Sotxcts w�flnHit= AttocheO FY 85186 FY TOTALS Subdhitslon $I09 400 $ST9,700 $53I, b $299299Mw Unit Lot Fee 3506600 3 a;500 196ixii: 2871�= 19l,60it 19626,600 Interest A080 4%0w 4%000 OpO 4%DW 222,000 Rental Income 101000 10,000 10gw 10,000 10,00D 50,OOa Landfill! 1 1I00 144 )4�' ODD 720,000 Fund Balance 6131)f83' . Sub Total S01000 $1,394,300 $1,3!6,6C4) $1.069,100 s925,5w Grants- No klatch 1974 Bond .•ct 00 • 0 00 903,000 d< 1976 Sand Act '*+' 134,800 : C 00 = 0 * 0 134,81V s Sub Total $ 214,800 0 0 0 0 $ 214,800 Sub Total Purchasing Paxer Without Matching Funds $8.57vWC In Grants Reo- irrt Match 19M Bond Act * $1369500 0 0 0 0 $136,5M S.R. 174 (6th Yr) # 115,200 0 0 0 0 115,200 x General Funs! +► 3%700 0 0 0 0 39,700 LU Energy & Reso-xccs 15,900 0 0 0 0 15,900 3Z. 174 (7th Yr) ** 2 OtlO 0 0 0 a 2,0w Sub Total S3091" 0 0 0 0 $309,300 TOTAL PURCHASING POWER WITH MATCH $1,167,100 $1,3941300 $!,5161600 $18069,100 $92S,500 �,t372,bfl0 NOTE: Possible usable assets not included in estimated incame '$5.365,840(20 112 acres)(Irby (8)-iMieder (2.5)-Tem (6)-Twrir Sr,site(4). * Acquisition of Encyclopedia lats ** Play equipment. **• Development- McCallen Park. 4461 G f 78713 .krc Ph 1983 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTX CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS • (PARK ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT) FIVE YEAR PROGRAM JULY 1, 1983 - JUNE 30. 1988 FIVE YEAR PROJECT PRIORITY 1. Newland rn - Bartlett Park - Phase I (Acquired April 1974) -To develop Newland Barn/Rest Rooms and Security Quarters as part of the Newland House - Historical Society ; 244,000 -Newland Grounds Landscaping 45,365 SUB TOTAL = 289,365 2. Land Acquisition - Central Park (November 1969) ; 448,50O (See sap - Exhibit 61) -To complete acquisition of property for expansion of Central Park, the following properties are yet to be acquired: -Encyclopedia Lots - 300 Total Cityy Owns 140 - In Escrow 8 ; 99,000 - Condesr:ation Proceedings 42 4929000 - Yet to TOTke AL Offer 13 1 642.500 NOTE., This is a high priority because tits cost of land continues to escalate. Ten years ago, encyclopedia lots cost Approximately $200 to $500 each; presently, the lots are averaging $11,000 per lot. With the development of the property south of Ellis, the land value in the surrounding area will continue to increasr:. -Two parcels located at the ` northeast corner of Edwards Street and Ellis Avenue - Parcel A. Huntin ton . Pacific Corp. 72.5 a:res) $3001,000 - Parcel 6, Huntington Pacific Corp. (,&'.35 acrr:s) 28 � TOTAL •Additional Properties under Consideration for Purchase (Exhibit Bx) - aarcel C, Ocean View s Nushroom Inc. 18.9 $ 5,135,551 I - Parcel 0. Mabal H. Bradley 1.9 149,190 - Parcel E. Richard J.' Pariseau .17 54.187 - Parcel F, Janes ,T. Hudson 1.0 2579985 - Parcel 6, Vlcmora Corp. 1.25 3530925 - Parcel H. Consists of 69 TotaI Lots (City owns two - 4.76 ,11 353j587 f' sixty-seven owned by nine a��ers j TOTAL 27.98 $7�904,425 ToW Land Value within Central ' Park boundary ;la,719,925 44329/7876 EXHIBIT 'A B w June 14. 1983 S z NOM We have $5246100 n able grant funds for park ac(`% ition and development. City's Match is $61,200 for a total purchase power of $585,300. kCallen Park will receive $134,800 for development. Play equipment grant is $2,000. Total Central Park Land Acquisition is $448000. 3. McCallen Pnrk (acquired June 1977) $ 340,000 -Develop a 5.5 acre neighborhood park located on the east side of Huntington, south of Yorktown Avenue. 4. Mieder Park (formerly Warner Park Site) (Acquired September 1976) $ 2801000 -Develop a 5 acre neighborhood park at the northeast corner of Pearce Street and Lynn Street. S. Manning Park (acquired July 1978) ; 157,S00 -Oevelop a 2.5 acre neighborlacod park located at the southeast corner I of California and Detroit Streets. cc 6. Laehbert Park - Phase II (acquired September 1976) 151,i0a t -During first phase development of this { neighborhood park, 1.5 acres was developed in 1976. The second phase consists of development of refaaining two acres. Location - west side: of Wend Avenue, between Ellis and Talbert Avenues. 7. Irby Park - Phase ii 107,800 0 acres - 1%4i balance of 7.6 acres acquired December 1971) fir: -phase I was developed in 1964 as a !, neighborhood park. At its meeting of October 251, 19829 the Council overruled i . Planning Commission's decision and found the sale of 6 acres of undeveloped Irby ' Park site to be in conformance with the ; General Plan. Council directed City staff proceed to develop the remaining two acres of parkland to provide for a 5 acra park, declared the excess property to be surplus and directed staff hold in abeyance the sale of the excess property. S. 61bbs Nature Center (acquired February 1975) 177� 80 -To develop a 5 acre eucalyptus tree grove into a nature park located on Me west side of Graham and south of Hall Avenue. tie 1 '7. t 443x6J7870 June 14, 1963 flirt•, r'\•...7+•. •-w's ,.a..n.nua•arou!y. .>vay•pl..w.p� .il i 9. Rancho View Park (S )l Opened 1959) ; 1479900 ' -Proposed devela�nt of 3 acre neighborhood Nark site located on Ocean View School District property at the northeast corner of Warner Avenue and 400 Street. Property is presently being used as off street parklog for Little League baseball. 10. Lamb Park (School Opened 1964) ; 62,730 -To develop a one acre neighborhood park at Lamb School located on Yorktown Avenue, east of @rookhurst Street. Property is owned by the Fountain Valley High School District. The property is presently open space. 11. Bartlett Park - Phase II (acquired January 1973) ; 8439000 Phase I will be the developeent of the Newland House and grounds. To develop a 30 acre open space naturhi park on the � wrest side of Coldwater Lane from Adams to Yorktown Avenues. 12. Street ImprovemeUs - Goldenwest West Side $ 2701000 -Must side of Goldenwest from Ellis Avenue to Rio Vista Avenue. 13. Strott tmprovmnts - Goldenwest East Side i0O9000 I -Ust side of Goldw west from Talbert Avenue to approxintely Rio Vista Avenue. 14. Huntington Lake Improvements (acquired November 1969) i 2506000 •To improve water quality. Reconstruct shore line. Construct boat and fishing .pier. The pier will provide aeration to the lake and enhance concession operations. 16. Sports Complex • Huntington Central Park (acquired Naveaber 1969) ; 29557,ow -The f0lowing is a cost breakdown for proposed development of the 25 acre sports coaples for Huntington Central Park. 1 6 ballfields 210420275 ? 2 Parking for 600 vehicles ; 514972S r, 16. City So and pool Site Acquisition (Agreement June, 1967) ; 250'000 -to acquire .783 acre site of City-ovnod k; Gym a+Ad Pool located at 16th and r Paler. Property if owned by Huntington }. Reach City School District. { Agreeiment with District for use of f acillty txpires June 69 1987. If this aggrre0ont �l Is canceled, the City must denolish the building and clean the property. 44 g/7816 June 149 1963 �....�....�......._.......'.-•,.•...-..._...»..nv'n-c RIGu`'f 1•.:;•rrra. _:,rY.61Y1:.:....r: +'r-.<..,t't-cvllfa_::tw•;oc:G�•foal.rl.lNn rli n':.:..c:aanr.,.....�,►,w,w.wIr.r.+... ."' ,~. 17. Fishing Lake Oeveloq �t - Central Park (acquired Nove"�er 1969) ; 976j000 -To convert former Sully Miller gravel pit to a public fishing lake in Huntington Central Park. TOTAL FIVE YEAR PARK ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM s 9,824g175 FISCAL YEAR 1983/84 OPERATING EXPENSES EXPENSES Estimated Cost ""Can`""�'t ita a Architecture • d C" e . CeSTins, working drawings and specifications for remaining City parks. Anticipated completion - January 1, 1984. Landfill operation - t)r1e Year QB.BOtI - o con t i nue"f i`r i ng—`o `the old Bruce Brothers site for eventual development of a 2S acre park site. T07AIL OPEIWING EXPENSES i146�aQ0 { 1 ' I •j c i { ti 7 S S A , r •f - ,f 4432607878 dune 14i 1983 t _ -..__..... .�-...•�,..a,; uNqiM(�Mrrr s•�r-,:rA ...,,.n.:+srr....i.;..,......•:.:a:, ,..ay1.r•fracyv,rRtM'Wt�uJ,ct�..s.+rni►^,rwrnw o••sw+.uw.w�.�.�...+,-�w.,^re . i B ,t�rt►/�}'Nc�l�t/ f�''C�� r�,.�s 2d'2,�,>� ToT� .'� +?' ' erg AW W V, R,4Z CB��sT LAI "iVv� r Eat } I. ..�...- .,�.. ,. ,... _..�r..........�rw��wN...»....�...�..�rnn.w....�..................w...��..+twn.»...�......r.....�.......+...�s.r.w.�....�.w�.. .. �.. .-'�.. _ r�� �f 1 1, y / 0 i .✓ � ���r� ,tNrIN4MN t Z EN,rR,44 of Wy 1 1d�i�T #rC'hVac .w IL on r#/S/r q •••• • '-.»•�.avd..rr..c�•i4".w.vws.r::...N..•...r.a Y'. rJl'. .1C.. Jl.f1lYA'.:..n..l.v A":,.--JJ7. qi.:t4iS+w1►I:...tae....—n a..Wye .�.w�.r•v� ••• .1•� REQUEST F,R COMMISSION/ r ARD ACTION Meetfiiq Dale Mareh._3U . l_g1j1 Submitted to: Community .,evv i ces Comm i ss i ern �r� Submittedby: Vincent G. Moorhouse, Director-, Community .lervices 'I Pr*pared by: Vincent Q. Moorhouse, Director, Community :;erJvice:;� Subject:* Huntington Central Park Shorts Complex c) 0, ,70 Statement of Issue, Ancirrmcfation,Analysis. Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE I City ,Council has requested a study session on Lhe sports complex and prioritization of capital improvement projects, R COM.MENDATION 1) Make recommendation to Counell as to whoLher sports complex shouJrr be developed and operated by private enterprise or city ; 2 ) Establish a high priority for city operated ,nt't:bal l tournament fields its 11CP but delay corratrctction until Park Acquluition and { Development Funds become available. ' ANALYSIS ' ALLaehe cl se; Exhibit. "A" is the HCA which was curbrnlLted to Clt:y Cotiieeil on Mavch 7, 1983, recorru,rondinC that staff be authorized to rormulat.e a re. uest, for bid proposal for the pr{� vrsLe development of the NCE' sportn complex . At thn): meeting, the ri ty council asked t:beet the mutter fro to a study session. It appeared that Council was veluctsant, to approve private dev•:lopmeni, of the aports complex due to the concussionu it would have to make for a successful enterprise. Staff had based its recommendation for private development based on the knowledge that there � waa some urgency on the hart of Council that the facility be developer) as soon as poosible . Being Aware of the llmi trci amount of funds Ln tt:�: Park Acquisition and Development account, staff f'pl t: private enterJpris ,3 could develop the facility much more expeditiously than the city could.. � ;M Staf`1' now feels that Al' Council Is willing to wait until funds are available , the sports complex should be developed and operated by the city as a tournament softball facility. Thin recommendation in based -� on a recent; survey of the usage of city f'ac:illties by youth sports ' `�•� groups and on projected school district enrollment. (See Exhibits "C" , and "D. '' ) Staff feels that: the city has provided adequate and reasonable raci t ities to youth sports E*roupsr. Additionally, If thc � sN sports complex were developed for tournament softball leapuea , other 1; t'Ivldn in the city would be f reec1 up for use by youth sports graupo. EXHIBIT % Cff r . .^..-� .r-.err+.w�+n.. r..r..a.4iJliMa•A TT4•f,t'.\...\Nw.f'ilr�JSJi1\ •M(.f...W. V........r...Ya..•.•\..r...w.•w.....••.4Mw.w•M\'.tl..]rYY.TIJI.MNV 1Ya1MWM•tI.\4W�M r'.W.I\w+...r4. ..-.• `• : : 1 r i REQUEST FOR COMM15Slu UBOARU ACTION March 30, 1983 Page Two Subj : Huntington Central Park Shorts Complex It has also teen detetrmi»ed that little le: gue► Anti Simi lair group:t prefer to play in thu-itr own goneval ,tie lt,,lib ,trliimd avv:i. FUND1110 SOLIN 'E Paris Acquisition and i)evolopment Vt,nd ALTERNATIVE ACTIONO) Recommend sports complex ba deve]oj ed and oil!.vated by I)rivnte ent:err- pr1se. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit "A" - Request for City Council Action re Huntington Contra) Perk Sports Complex; Exhibit "B" - Results of special interest groups ' survey responses ; Exhibit "C" - Projected school districts' enrollment 1982 -- 1986; Exhibit "D" - Use of city facilities by and provision of facilities for youth sports organs-ationn. YRM:ct3 , { , i i; r t,,1 i• 1= t ,..nw+....+.....�..�.--..-.+.+wN..rwrlti.l4 yqi l.S'.Ir t�:w .':__r.:rr.. '. •. . . .r r ,. }fyw. ...a.:.tq 4 •vt �21r... .•R l'.•.I• •+a Prt•a.a•Rr. YNawlcw..w..w+rrv.-+ •.+'�;,`� .f. I SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP SURVEY SUMMARY Seventeen youth groups were contacted to ascertain their needs for additional or improved sports fields . Lighting was indicated as a major need of half of the groups who play in the Fall. The survey was circulated prior to the comple- tion of lighting facilities at Gisler and Dwyer. These additional lights should alleviate much of this problem. Only one Spring group indicated lighting was a problem. With the exception of a few playorr gamea , lighted fields are only used for practice. Each group has definite boundaries and any rields developed would solely benefit the group in that geographical location, with the exception of playoff nr tournament play. Projected school district enrollments attest to the fact that the South population in Huntington Beach is expected to decline approximately twelve percent the next four years . Lower partleipa•- tion is already evident in some or the youth sports activities. Our experience indicates that the adult softball program in the community sa well as the surrounding Area, is very popular and the sports complex will provide the facility to accommodate the adult softball needs rather than organized youth groups of the community. t i • j i 1 : EXHIBIT " D r. . ... _ _�...�,•./w..w+.r•,w....+✓-....•......�..�...........�......_..........-..•......r••...•.•n.-r•ace•.:she•.e�KK.Y.1..•Iv.s�:gilw..MMita0.Y7.XS�MM;.aiRkM."""^'".^, o f"e rS R '• '^� l; AWArf orr �J •a IFUMt'I V*WAC 1:_k4t, w 11 "'; __ -._.. ......«or,Var.w.�wnY u.,aa vt'..wna.y.�aa.w.r.� ..r+.. �.. ....•�1.4i!J:•.Lfr;: .....:•:i.[..... :am;.l7y;.N,Wwi•,t.a':;��.NIYiLA a�W�►,,.fF..+_wM^'r�^""`!•'wl ell's k/ r� CITY OF wuNrINGTO" BoACH INTER•OEPARTMENT COMMUNICATI N [WWA NINAC" To Jeri Chenelle , Admin. Assist. From Vincent Q. Moorhouas t Administration Director , Community Services Subject Cowiell Study Session Request Date May 249 1983 At its March 7, 1983, meeting, the City Council contlnAad 'con— sideration of the sports eompler matte- to a study sesclon, the date of which to be when staff was ready with its material. Please be advised that this office, is ready to bring the sports �• , complex matter to Councii rar decision. T would like to re quest one hour be pet aside for a study session before the City Council meeting of June 20. For Sc hedok ; 30 ? A, i nDE � 1i iL ��WIfIR11.�. ,' .1�•5�� COUNCIL ACTION API � Onto April 7 . 1983 Subm ttod to: T a e ty Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator FrWN by: Vincent G. Moorhouse, Director, Community Services subject: Huntington Central Park Acquisition - 009,60o Matching Fund i Grant - Recreational Vehicle Park Statement of Istte, Recomnwndstion,Analysis, Funding Source, Attentive Actions,Attachments, STATEMENT OF ISSUE The State of California approved a grant for the clty for a recreational vehicle project in Huntington Central Park in July of 1!)80. That grant will expire as of June 1, 1983. A policy decision is needed by the City Council as to its desire to use the grant for e. recreational vehicle park In HCP. RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to proceed with fulfilling requirements of the state grant by updating the appraisal of properties for a recreational vehicle park in BC?. ANALYSIS In July , 1980, the City was successful in obtaining a grant t'or construc- tion of a recreational vehicle park at the corner of Gothard and Ellis . Thia property is adjacent to the Sully VIller Lake and owned by the Ooeanview Mushroom Growers and the Sully Miller Corporation. At the same time, the Community Services Department was developing a proposed master plan of HCP which wan subsequently reviewed and updated by Ultra systems. In 1981, the City Council deleted the parcel proposed for the RV park from the HCP proposal. At that time, the city sought and obtained a transfer of the matching fund grant to apply to the property at the corner of Golden West and Elli.a which included the mushroom farm and four privately owned parcels. All of this property was placed in, a plan- ning mode study which was uubeequently reviewed by Council and acted upon. Because there has been no final decision with regard to the RV use or acquisition of land for that use, staff has been unable to proceed to meet the requirements of the hatching fund grant. The .State Department: of Parks and Recreation Land And Water Conservation Fund Project No. 06-00963 requires the city to submit appraisal and preliminary title reports to the state by June 1, 1983. These reports were done In the pact but would have to be updated and a decision made by Council as to whether staff should proceed. Failing to submit the required reports will result in the city losing the $609,600 matching fund grant, The funds would be made available to other jurisdictions. �.y...r.. -- _ .......w......,«.v.w.a..w i,a..r. ..-......«_._ .....-.�— ...n•r...in.�-.wvawV.YiYf.l'..+iW:1.:..!Lt�,•".r:AI;�YJ%(v?.r�.���� f: , i t. 10 101 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION April. 7, 1983 Page Two 5ub.1 ; Huntington Central Park Acquisition - $609,600 Matching Fund Grant -- Recreational Vehicle park With the city's matching funds, the total funding for the acquisition or property for a recreational vehicle park would arourit to $1,219,200. FUNDING SOURCE Park Acquisition and Development Fund ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Abandon the grant. ATTACHME14TS Maps showing area. StaM:cs .��-..� ..,...�...�.w«.»wv,vtias�rw.•rwr+.a...,,.•,.r.e...,.. .......,.+wcn••, •;�u:Li,v:r:ins•:tr+ca7�..vrun^.:.ti N.wary+..+,.�.�7NKwlh�w+w:nMs.+w+1�.!.r.rr•--7 ����IIIII 11J1J ir (;; : , ; ' !lb �1TTj l � �, iN .rs TTT F-R ' All -rlr r --hT Wunti I Ilan _ j' - -• �,{. ;: � :'. /� Central Dark • ;:. 'a'-� j r (3279 . ac.) - wtil';L r . _ IM - i I CF-C •//'tea/. —T � -..run•--_ I Pittnnit�g Mad .w Study A ea _. ,.- •�. 1219 Figure 1-1 AZ' N, c, 2 .. ....r..waMvatsti.a�:►•f:-!a0.�. a.'.t' pr!t'.4!C,r?�;;; '',a r �t�L • I t _... ,' ) C; F- R _ TT '! p is r i - OUAN VIEW MUSURom CROWE'-RS, INC. " A I1I01ARD PARISE:AU ;F Es - MABEL RRAULEY - JAMES flUnSON - SMA11. LOT OW :RS t 1y1� OWNERS111P Ffqure 1-6 ! + �IM.• 1;,. 1.._: ' ..�.+..r.+vr.J�..w.wr..s....v+.r.•r.+'.Mr......�..wt�. . t;,.w.tl llT. !!' n!!.`l.A.'+,�Y,�Ci�h�7j� ! r r+,ur �rnw�waxcnmYa) ): i fl" i 1 _ REQU NCI ACTION � 7:=7 AprilD«taSu4�tted to: The Hane it Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administ kx� 0 AK Pftrwwadby: Vincent Q. Moorhouse, Director, Community Services Sect: Huntington Central Park Equestrian Trails 401 Statement of iww,Re=....wMation,Analysh, Finadins Souns.Aftwedw Action, Attechn"IS: STATEMFIiT OF ISSUE There is a need to relocate the equestrian trails that were displaced by the new equestrian center development. A complete master plan of equestrian trails for Central Purk needs to be established and a policy decision made on how much acreage in Central Park should be master planned specifically for equine use . RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Prepare and adopt a master plan of equestrian trails for HOP; 2. Authorize construction of fenced equestrian trail between the Friabee golf area and Taylor Street to ineet the temporary needs of equestrian use and relocate the displaced trails; 3. Authorize appropriation of $10,000 from Park Acquisition and Development Fund to construct rcnci.ng for the equestrian trail recommended in #2 above. 4. Authorize starf to prepare a proposed resolution establishing a horse license fee with revenue to be used for trail maintonance . ANALYSIS With the construction of the now equestrian center, part of thq eques- trian trail established in 1973 by grant funds was displaced. This has created concern on the part of equestrians who have horats boarded outside the park boundary. They feel they are being denied access to the new center and are losing riding trails within the park. With the growth occurring in the city, equestrians are faced with nontalnment, not only on private property, but also on city-owned land. 'There Is a need to master plan equestrian trails within HOP and to estaL•lish. a policy as to how much land is to be utilized in HOP for equine use. However, thiw wrill require some time and staff feels that an immediate solution is needed. Also, a solution rust be provided concerning the diaplacement: or a portion of the trail by the equestrian center to in- sure that the equestrians are provided with an identifiable, quality trail of approximately 10,000 linear reet: in length. Representatives of the equestrian community have also raised the issue that they are being denied a trail through the trees' in ;he now eques' - trian center which was the location of the old trail. TheF have recom•- no 4M . , ket. i.';, .`•, .ii;M�r. a+.li:�:.i.%;k,'.Pitiiiti,`j�i'�'��t� �I'�t'' REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION April 6 , 1963 Page Two Sub, : Huntington Central. Park Equestrian Trails mended that the city restore the trail or construct a loop going com- pletely around the equestrian center. There have been numerous meet- ings with representatives of the equestrian community, the Mayor, members of the City Council, the City Administrator and Mr. Milligan, lessee of the equestrian center. Two basic alternatives have evolved from those meetings: (1) Shall the city underwrite the lessee' s lia- bility for the temporary trail and require the lessee to relinquish pFd� dirty from his lease, or (2) Shall the city develop a new' traiil that wciiild becotii part o,^ the future master plan. Several exhibits are included to explain the issues and delineate the Area in question. The Community Services Commission reviewed this matter at its adjourned regalar meeting of March 30, 1963 , and approved the recommendations of staff. With an established trail system, there is a definite need to main- tho oailing as well as the trail. Since the trail system was origi- nally developed, it has deteriorated badly . The railing needs constant repair. The city has attempted to do this maintenance with volunteers. Presently, there is no funding for city forces to do this work. It is, therefore , recommended that a minimum License fee be established for all horses boarded within the city of Huntington Beach. Revenue from this license fee would be used solely for mainte- nance of the horse trails and fencing. Other areas have implemented such a. fee and if Council approves the recommendation, staff will invest.iga.te the procedures of those communities and incorporate them into a .resolution for Council consideration. - FUNDING SOURCE Park Acquisition and Development Find ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Do not replace the portion of trail displaced by the equestrian eentmr. Retain only the trails which remain and construct no additional trails until park is master planned. 2 . Allow a temporary equestrisri trail around the outside perimeter or the existing equestrian center with no trail or outside Tence construction and accept additional liability to the city and to Better Built Enterprises. 3. Allow a temporary Pquestrian trail around the outside perimeter of the existing equestrian center and incur cost of construction of a trail and fencing to separate Oolden West Street, the Marian property and the Frisbee golf course. This alternative would require that city to accept additional liability as well as cover � the liability to Better Built Enterprises . .fk..;rvJ vi�Pu'r.t..i':',..C/-^.. h ..-;;....1..::1'"i•7.�•_ .. rr _ � S t'�}, �] REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION April 6, 1983 Page Three Subs : Huntington Central Park Equestrian Trails ATTACHMENTS I. Department memo to tha Community Services Commissiun outlining the problem; 2 . Isetter from Mr. Milligan, President of Better Built Enterprises, stating his position as lessee of the equestrian center; 3. Four maps : a) Original approved trail in HCF; tl) Trail system as actually constructed and trails, created and used by the equestrians, as well as established boundaries of the equestrian center; c) Plan A -- Staff' s recommendation for a solution; to the problem with cost estimate; d) Plan B -- Proposal by equestrian community for relocating trail and cost estimate. VOM:ct5 �!��..... .�.. .. .�ti..r......... � .. .+.wa.. ...r...nl..r+r,n.V..•a..rr ..Y..7.A. ...11:a"f.'.�rv.li' ..nK'.77.�V<.f.v.":b.:111 .•aYf:r•:+c. ♦ � f IUGGrSi1'�1iC71GI�lS' +�i • Jr COMMUNITY SERVICES W%IM,1114 14M11 Departmental Memoraudum to Community Services qf mmission r"M 0 Vincent Q. Moorhliuf aAnc . March 28, 1983 •u..xtT . Rqueetrian Use in Huntington Central Park This year, the citr entered into a long-tewrm lease for a permanent, first-. class equestrian center in luntington Central Park. The old Reynolds' stables , which encompassed ten acres , were expanded by a 25-acre facility, totally fenced, which will include boarding facilities, horse . rental service, show arena/sales pavilion, training rings and, ultimately, ,a clubhouse or restaurant . The equestrian community in Huntington Bernh Is concerned that 'deve]lopment of the new equestrian center has displaced P. portion of the equestrian trail which was developed under a $10,000 federal grant in 1978• Such grant required thr: city to build the trail and maintain it thereafter. Originally, meinbers of Trail 100, an equestrian group in the city, vol- unteered to maintain the trail and, in fact, spent considerable time depositing tree chips and other material on the trail. For some years, the city attempted to keep the trail railing repaired; however, because the original railing was not properly constructed, it has deteriorated and undergone heavy vandalism. Trail, 100 members also worked diligently to patrol the Pence to keep four-wheelers out of thu park. They 'did 'a good Job.. The city park ranger has continued with that patrolling and has an extensive citation program to limit F,caes3 to the trails by other tnan equestrians. With the development of the new equestrian center, lt .is logical at this t1se to matter plan the equestrian trail uystem from the center to the ingreas and egi1ess paints where the future linear park will. avnnedt as well as with the equestrian estates being master planned to the south of the park. The .majority of Land in HOP dill not heave .a master plan. As the Commission is aware, it has worked with Staff and Council for,almost 'three years to identify the uses that were desired by the public for HOP. ` This work entailed meeti.ngo and public .hearinga as well as a market analysis and matiter plan proposal by Ultrasystems . The -proposal -by Ultral systems was subpitt.ed to Council. and reviewed on August 17, 1981. At : that time, Council approved those portions of the proposal it desired and, instructed starf, to proceed to develop saane. The equestrian center, was one or those projects approved. Thia Council lnst tion resulted in s proposal Cram Better Built Enterprises to expand city'n equlne► facil=. tty from 10 to 215 acres on property located adj; to Oolden West Street, `tha 'A.C. Marion property to the south and tha Pi Solt course . to ,the . . north. ',' orth. Council approved.Better Built 's proposal contract on dcto�s ber 25 1982. The equestrian center is now approx:Lmatel.y''50 ,pareant cola- 1 Conmiunity Services Commission March 2139 1983 Page Two pleted. Construction has been held up due to the exceptionally rainy weather in the past few months . As mentioned, Trail 100' s concerns are for the elimination of a portion of the grant- funded trail. Equestrians with horses boarded outside the park are concerned that they are being denied i :cess to the riding trails in addition Lo what they feel is a reduction 1,. total riding area. The equestrian community toad thought that the trall was to be a permanent trail system In NCP. In dl=t3sing this matter with staff, it was deter- mined that the grant funde,i trail was never considered permanent because the land hhd never been matter planned. Also, portions of they trail were on land prf.vately owned by absentee lardloids . The city is endeavoring to acquire these encyclopedia lots for inclusion in Central Park:. However, until the land is totally acquired, the equestrians are trespassing on private property . For years , the equestrians have used the open space, which In mostly agricultural or oil producing, freely. With the growth occurring in the city, the equestrians are being faced with containment of their activity and denial of riding on private property. Hence , their ,justifiable concern as to the lose of trail in HCP. Obviously, there Is a need for a master Manned equestrian trail in HCP as well as in the, whole city . The Development Services staff have been working toward that goal for many years . The neig equestrian center makes the attainment of that goal more necessary. In ray- meetings with the equestrians, the Mayor, City Council and City Adm1histrator, the major issue was that the trail be maintained In the equestrian cejntet, where it had originally been. On numerous oeoaslons, I have attempted to explain that Better Built Enterprises did not desire a public trail through the equestrian fat:il.ity. Mr. Milligan, President of Be*tter quilt., is providing, a trail head for access from the center to the trail eystem in 11CP. However, he felt that there was considerable liability crested to his operation if a trail were created through the facility . I have: attached a letter from Mr. Milligan outlining his con- cerns on the matter. In addition, in discussions with the City Risk 1.4arnager, Ivor. Gitsham, he agrees that tho city would be exposed to un- necessary liability and eont to indemnify getter Built against: all inch dents involving a trail through that property. It is important for Commission and Council to understand that when the gratit funded trail was built, it was approximately 10,350 feet long as an identified trail on the map. Additionally, equestrian, motor'oyclists and tour-wheelers Created 4,275 feet of additional trail by riding in open fields . Within the last four years, we have almost eliminated four- wheelers and motorcyclists from the park through strict enforcement. The trails created by those vehicles have been disced but were eventually recreated by the equestrians . They are currently using an addttI onal thirty acres of 'land which hos not been master planned for,uee al. this time:. The use of that land is not an immediate problem. 17-aiee this issue in order to inform Commission and Council that in the park,, prior to deleting the portion of trail by the equestrian center developments there was a total of 14,625 feet of trail. The portion deleted totaled 5,120 feet, which leaves 9,505 feat of remaining, Identifiable 'equestrian" trail ,and represitnts a reduction of approximately E4; feet from. the total number of feet allocated in the original trail.. Staff -if) recommend- ing replacement of approximately 1.,300 square feet or trail on the nor- a� i Community Services Commission March 30, 1983 Page Three thern side or the equestrian center between the lake and the Frisbee golf course with a turn-around area near Golden West Street. Two Frisbee golf tees would have to be moved. We are pruposirg that this trail be totally fenced so as to contain the horses on the trail and i prevent conflicts, with other users of the park, not to mention keeping horses from bolting out onto Golden West Street. Mr. Milligan will ferice one side and the city the other. If adopted, the staff recommendation would provide riders with a trail through extensive Eucalyptus trees and various terrains and elevations, all enhancing the qua of.' the ride. This particular portion of the trail could become a 1:,rmanent lets of the system through the park. It would be an equitable solution in that it not only provides the afore- mentioned amenities, but also exceeds the number of feet in the original trail. Thin recommendation certainly limits the city's liability, meets the needs or the equestrians, provides a permanenv solution, and appears to solve a lot of problems. The alternative suggested by the equestrians would create addi-ional problems . They have asked to be allowed to use the street right-of-way In Front of the equestrian facility and a. ten-foot strip of the center's property which is adjacent to A. C. Marion' s property. Mr. Milligan' questions allowing a trail across two roadways into his center and giving street access to run-away horses. Also, if the trail were placed in the street right-or-way in front of the center and adjoining the highway, fencing would be required in addition to extensive movement of earth to create ramps for a newly inutalled city water vault. Once Golden West Street Is Improved, th.Ld portion of the trail would be deleted, thereby negating any investment mule to create the trail. Additionally, develop- ment or the trail adjacent tc the Marion property would be on a severe grade, requiring a out of the grade and installation of a retaining wall and fencing to separate the trail from the Marion property. This trail would empty out onto private property , or encyclopedia lots which the 'city has no:. yet acquired. �a Unless the city is willing to accept tcie liability associated with this proposal as well as the cost of building the trail, :staff feels the equestrians' suggestion should be rejected. The city could allow horses to ride on the present grade and along the front of the center to mabce the loop; but, we honestly feel, the city would be accepting tremendous liability. This Is a policy decision that has to be made by Commission and Couric: il- Staff feels that any futures development of trails should be based on a master plan or concept; acceptable to Commission and Council.. We should not spend money on a project that will have to be redone in the future.. Or additional concern is that as development occurs around the park and the city continues to grow, we will be faced with a need to separate equestrian trails and uao from other park users for the sake of liability. vam:cs A•ttaohnent : Eddie Milligan better 4 Better Built Enterprises, Inc Equestrian F.+fcffities Designed & Manufactured 701 W. GIENEGA AVE. SANDIMAS, CALIFORNIA91713 (213)35B45151331-3214 (714)SIEi-'. Q March 21, 1983 Mr. Vincent G. Moorhouse Director, Community Services City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Daar Mr. Moorhouse I have met with the Mayor, Councilman Kelly, the City Admin- istrator, yourself, and some equestrians on numezous occasions concerning the public riding trail. I have always stated that I would cooperate with the City Council with regard to the release of a 10' strip of land along the A.C. Marion property south to Bolden West Street. This proposed temporary riding trail will have a tremendous adverse affect on our planned services and aotivitieas. We will no doubt have to reevaluate some of than city requirements in our contract. We do not feel we can, in gmd conscience, provide horses to the general public to ride on thin trail, with built-in hazards to our horses and riders. The trail, as planned, will create two funnels to the fast moving: heavily traveled Golden West Street. It would be only a mattar of titm before a horse would run away or bolt into oncoming traffic at either the north or south side of our property. The activity in our riding arenas would be greatly affected by the constant disturbance of trail traffic. The distractions caused by riding i up and down this trail would create hazardous conditions within our center. The liability of any lawsuit will have to be addressed by the city. The city will have to' indenu,ify us and our operation against any lawsuit which may occur by the location of this temporary public trail. Sincerely, Better Built nterprises, Inc. Pb Eddie J. Milligan President EJM:+d jm PM . 7WPt+u wvw•ara�rnWw'..n.n.:+r+...•.c...+.....rw.r.craw: atx:..l,•ruv.ic<r.:e....ettntA,iiw`i��fl!'SL�i.i'li.ti'ti\*ta.va.r'el '.F9NRMM.�1 it - ., .t.• Al • 1 i, --- t I FLAN A Cost Estimate Plan A represents staffs proposal to construct a 1300 foot equestrian trail as an extension to the present equestrian trail, adjacent to the Frisbee goif course and Huntington Lake on one side and the equestrian center on the other side. This proposal will require city to fence only one side of the trail. 14r. Milligan will be fencing the entire perimeter of the equestrian center. Note: These costs are based on city forces doing all trail work. All fencing will be done by contract . Installation of 1300 feet of fencing and turn-around at Golden West Street . . . . . . . $ 79563 Tractor work, miscellaneous work (moving of sprinkler heads, removal or trees and relocation of two Frisbee golf tees . . . . . . 2,500 TOTAL . . . . . . $10,063 7.r+.w......-- .r-.+rc VN.PI�:'.YMiif:t:L.:::{M'w:r:•.ram,......+a., .s._.,l,r.a•r.a Jr+enp�z.+r..u.w+.�N1'Y�1i'w�"'^"4:.�at'IsM�V�:N.7 t t. 77771 � a PLAN B - Cost Estimate Plan B represents construction or a temporary trail system which will include the same area as Plan A, with the exception of the turn-around being eliminated, and will also provide for the trail to move southerly in front of the equestrian center onto the undeveloped Golden West Street right-of-way, to turn westerly onto a ten-foot easement to be granted by Better Built Enterprises and onto encyclopedia lots eventually connecting with the existing trail . Note : These costs are based on city B forces doing all trail work. All fencing will be done by contract . Installation of approximately 2700 feet or fencing of the Frisbee golf course, Bolden West Street and A.C. Marion property 14,960 I Tractor and miscellaneous work . . . . . . . . . 42000 Liability coverage of Better Built Enterprises (cost unknown at this time) PLAN B-1 --- Cost Estimate Plan B-1 would .fence only Golden Went and the Frisbee golf course, leaving the Marion property open. Less tractor work would oe involved. Installation or fencing along Golden West . . 3s300 Installation of fencing of the Frisbee golf Bourse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,150 Tractor work . 2,0500 i TOTAL 12,950 f Y ~� ••• "•'r MIT.M.�VM.([.lt.•1ViYtM•rwrr rlV��•r...w.iwr..•^ 'ti.IMNwI�tSIVY�L•M,I.f.ti,l31_.N'r1.I.s•W..•uL..SS-.e�rYifaLilty�l" ra CITY OF NU111ITIN13TON NUACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Charles V. Thompson From pan T. Vii lei I& City Administrator Acting Chief of Administrative Services Subject Sonstructinn of Fenced Date April 13, 1983 Equestrian Trail in Central Park FIR 1 83-44 in response to the Community Services Department, at Financial Impact Peport has btzn prepared and submitted relative to the proposed construction of a fenced eq�mstrian trail In Huntington Central Park. It has been estimated that an appropriation of $10,WQ would be adequate for this project. Sufficient funds are available in previously approved projects that will not be stforted 'prior to the beginning of the next fiscal year. do Can T. Y111e11a Acting Chief of.Administriklve Service* M ARA" - 2 , .. ...... ...r. .. ,. .. ....� .. 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT Project Nww Co nstruction of Fenced E ua5trlan Trail in HCP O*Scrlptian Requested funding for this Qroject. i . DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1.1 One-Time Costs L N in of urn.. ec Aa ulsltion Cunstruttlon tles E ui men Other Total Cost 10,000 10,000 1.2 Recurring Annual Costs ddittNorte star a s t uts a Plus' , P r nail 3 11e� v Rays to Cc,s 1.$ Raplecenwntftonlwal Costs NiA 2. INDIRECT C'JSTS .Loss of Corning capability due to expenditure of funds. Financlal Impact Ropovt ' Page 2 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT Construction of the fenced equestrian trail between the Frisbee golf area and Taylor Street. as recommended by staff, will meet the temporary needs -of equestrian ■r r �+ � ir������■ ram.. r use and relocato the farmer trails that were displaced by the recent equestrian center development. 5• PROJECT USAGE 1 5. EXPENDITURE TIMING Subsequent to G{tY Council approval. 7'• COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT City retain the option of not replacing any portion of displaced trail or of allWing a temporary equestrian trail around the outside perimeter of the existing center as noted bZ the requestinc source in the attached correspondence. 41 f� PO Jtrf• .r,;M.ZZI& . • REouEs r FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION • ci1 U4 go �!w w� y'Fah►s Date Submitted to: The honorable Mayor and City Council -13 Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson , City Administrat � crry u� K.�... Prepared by: Vincent G. Moorhouse , Director, Corn.munity .)ez-vices Subject: Resolutlon Approving Application fov Grant Fund - Land and Water ,Conservation Fusid Program Ire-r '3� SV V Statemutt of Iwo, Recommendation,Analysis. Funding Source, Altamative Action:,AttaLhments: . C11— STATEMENT OF ISSUE Orant funds are available through the Land rind Water Conservation Fund Program for acquisition of encyclopedia lots in Ifuntington Central Park, The city's application for grant funds must he accompanied by an adopted resolution of the City Couneti approving said application. RECOMME11 DATI ON Adopt the attached resolution approving the city 'sr application for grunt funds for acquisition of encyclopediri lots In 11untington Central Park. ANALYSI: The State Department of Parks and Recreation has notified the city that competitive grant funding its available through the Land and Water Conservation Fund Program. This pavticul.av grarit application in for $200 ,000 and requires a 100 percent match of city funds. Previously approved state grants , i .e . , Parklands Bond Act of 1980, Roberti Z'berg Open Space and 1976 State Bond Act , will be used for the cAty 's3 required match. FUNDINGSOURCE Parklands Bond Act of 1980; Roberti Z 'berg Open Space; 1979 State Bond Act . ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS t Make application for a facility other than Huntington Central Park. ATTACI?MENTS Resolution and application VGM:VIM ca 6403, RaL Op (41,4a' W�al� wjJ Fro u+r, i I EXH'IM A l APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach u I PAOJtX.'T(S) I Huntington Central Park Acquisition j I have determined that the Applicant's IMP acquisition and/or deve2dt3neit project(s) will not adversely affect cultural properties included in or eligible for inclusion in thn National Register of Historic Places. This determination is contingent upon the Applicant's corrirrenee that any plans for development, not to exclude minor inprovanents Involving ground disturbance, will be submitted to the State Historic Preservation Officer for review and ocnment at the earliest opportunity. In the event that develcament plans will not be formulated and/or implemented by the Applieant,but by another agency or group, the Applicant will Assume the respwaibility for ensuring that all provisions and stipulations contained herein are exec%ited, as needed, jairstly with that agency or group or indesaendently by that agency or group. ibis determination is further contingent upon: the Applicant's cc mibwt to implanent in good faith the following program of canplla:nce with 36 CFR 900, 0cecutive Under 11593, and Section 106 of tht National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 &a awr:dsd: 1. The AMl.icant its the prods* that proper cultural resource identification, evaluation, and management wUl be an integral part or the planning process for the project(s) . acoordinclly, prior to the corn+enc�,n+ernt of any physical develgM nt activity, the Applicant at his designee will arrange bo have appropriately qualified professionals perform such investigations s as way be necessary to: a. Identify, evaluate, and manage any cultural values betted within the project's potential area of enviornnrntal ingwt that are included in i or may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Riisboric Places. i (1) If, after consultation with the State Historic Preserveticr. officer, any values not already included in the tistional Register are determined to be eligible for inclusion in lane Haitional. Register, the Applicant or his deoignea will nminate them to the AegimWr a000rding to established praceftre!s. Mmli ations shall be ,outwitted tr the State Historic � Prewrvation Officer no later than six months after the adoption of a final development plan. b. Determine, in eamultation with the State Historic Preaervatien Officer, if arnd to what extent these values may be ai&nrsely affected by p].aminq, development, dperati.on, and maintar:anee activity. .. ... .. . ... f.n .. .. / ••..:V. v. �. .jam c.. Develop and implement prudent and feasible measures, acceptable to the Applicant or his designee and the State Historic Preservation Officer, capable of either effectively mi'igating or at*oiding adverse effects on National register and National Register eligible values. Avoidance and protection will be preferred objectives. H wtever, should discussions indicate that only sa, thing less is achievable, that course of action which to likely to cause the least unnecessary damage to these values will proceed. Decvnentation of compliance with each of these stipult:ations as needed will be submitted to the State Historic Preservation Officer for review and corm ent in timely fawlion. 7?e Application or his designee will unilaterally determine the time mmt suitable for the can, arient of cultural resource investigations acknowledging, however, that: 1. 7tey will constitute a part of thi planning process providing data for sound, advance planning decisions. T. 111ey will be oapleted before a final development plan is a#ted and any physical, activity begins. Failure bo comply with ary ot= the provisions and stipulations herein contained shall emstitute grounft fir revocation of a no adverse effect determination and Mall require full Application ccxmmpliance with the Advisory Om=il Procedures. i S' TE HISMC SUM CVr-1 City Adnihistrster e e t i . t CISTIFICATMN OF CQMPLMCE WrM FL 91-646 AND THE BRAI'MAM`E ACT rn order to assure caspliaucs with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 for projects utilising the land and Water Conservation Fund) each application for a devolopsont project where the applicant holds fee title to the project area will require one of the following cartificationst 1. If the lead to be developed was acquired within the two (2) rears prsceeding the application deadline, the application suet include two copies of a certification by tho applicaut's legal counsel that Public Yaw 91446 and/or Chapter 161 "California aovern ent Coda 7260-7275, Rolocation Assistance", lBraithwaite Act) van complied with. A sample certification follows: The applicant (Agency base) hereby aamrea and certi4ea that the prorlsions of PL 91-646 were emplied with in the acquisition of property identified in the Land and Water Conservation Fund appli- cation for the (Project Name) Huntington Central Park Acquisition And further certifies thatt r A. The rroperty was appraised prior to nedotialioans. a. The property over or his representative had beet invited by th* appraiser to acompany his on his inspection of the P rtT• C. The property owner or his reprememtative was giver the . oprpaettmity to revive the appraisal MAd eau "lotted with a wry of just compmm atice. ; De The property awwr or his representative wu offered the appraised valve. E. (a) The property ma not web j"t to the releeatIM a wistaace act as there were no peroau ],i" am the propMrty or bwrinessea being o andtrc tGC; DR " (b) All eligible occupants wiore offered welaoation. asiirtanae. C1 tar Attermy . '".���• Cormsel of A ilwant t Date 2. If the acquisition occarred more than two (2) years baton the appli- cation deadline, the applicant must provide either the above cortifi- cation or three copies of a written certification by the authorized representative of the state or local. 6overawmt agency sponsoring the project, indicating under penalty for willful sisstateneat (18 Q.S.C. 1001), that at the tine of the acquisition and last krnow:t displacemeatq such adsncy had not Tot initiated plains activity to abtaia the particular Federal assistance being applied for. A ample certification follow: ?, Charles W. Th son Ci Administrator Name) Autharicad He prom ntattve T t MI16+enc�► her %T certify, under penalty for vi11ful ■issukeaw t (18 O.S.C. 1001) that at the tim of the saquialtioa mad Let known dispincesent on the project lands for which this Federal financial assistance is heir sought, no plamAiag WA been initiated by this agency to obtain this ti"Acial a Satanas. 1aae ---, tuw � I t • I i f r i i i r N r r,.t No fanr.11A M. pakwo trMl /.!. IiFatAplt N llll M1MM Alimi F of miaGANa pent rt,east MM se's N 1%41 City of Huntingt0n Heagb . (hereinafter called "Appiktnt.ltetipitnt") I tame wt Apok-*"�RKlrim t HEREBY AGREES THAT 1T will cornpir with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 4964 (P•L. Ss-Sl=) at all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the Department of the interior Regulation (43 Cell 17) issu• pursuant to that title, to the end that, iit accordance with Title YI of that Act and the Regulation, no r• son in elm United States shall, on the grouted of race, color, or national origin be excluded from particii tion in, bs•denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimlasition under any program or acri- for whkh the Appl lean t•Recipient eeceieet hnaneial stsists.xve from H.C.R.S. s; tsww.r 0`ea Hereby Gives Assistance That It will Immediately take any measures to eil?ecraate this agrettnent. If any real property of ,eructate thereon is ptpt�dgd Sor Improved with the aid of federal financial astistatn eav radtd to the Applkanc.Reeipieat by . This assurance obliptes t bwwr .f oA CV e Applicsnr.ReeipW& or in the case of any transfer of such property. any trahsftmt for the period duri Which the ral property or stru.-Murt Is usted for a prqbose Involving the provision of similar services or be, Act. if any personal property is so providtd, this assurance oblig^tes the AppUaat.Reeipitnt for the peas � during •ehkh it resins owntnhip or possession of the property, to all other caa^ this assunncte oblige the A'p�(rficint•Recipient for the period during which the fedenl AnweW asalstamit Is extended to It by-- as N ONIt j THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the puepose of obtaiatinR any and all ledenl gnr loans. coneraca. Irro"n. discounts or other Federal iinsnrial assisan" extended alter the dace hstttot to t Applicant.Redpleot by the bnresu or office. incNAIng Installment parssteaes after such date tin account arrattgersieetrs for federal financial assistance which were approved beftwe wch date. TN Applipnt•Reciptt m"niars end Wm that sesch•Federal insaicial sasistsace will be a mmded is reliance *a the teptesentth- and sgrr moats crude let this sastuance, and that the United Sates shall tweret the eight to seek Wit eRfOrcemetst of this astufteso. This sasurartce is binding on the Applkw1•Re.4pi**% In tocetssors, fro fet"% and assignees, send the person or persons whose slgnoeurr appear below are authorized to sign 1 assonsce, an behalf of else Appllaust.RKIiWent. j CM or jg=JWTOY 1StACIi..a. � March 22, 1983 ' Dr:� t(r' �4 fnA �ftLlCAerr•.R Charles W. Thompson City Administrator j • w 1 •�t�•rrtvdr • wiwlssi tSiala � 2O00 Main Streat, Huntington 3each, CA 92648 af'MMG►W.RtCM11rT's MAMM not)Rtsa t Sg? g af1•t OMti AI+Mw I th ri-MIf �, IlyMit R �,t1UM tt R FEDERAL. ASSISTANCE I• ors 0 1KAiMTlbfl A/rLI. r. a►rt _".— loTMotil• ►.CAR 'Vol "Owl, dm► ACnON lM AMLIGTION CATION sw�� ' ^'� Alsl/tllo It a W9ff Of nWK AWN • /. ICOAL AI UCANTJl1MPtEUT L /LD411�11 RM/Loyin IDUITIncAnom No. MNtwl a.AIN= I City of Huntington Beach ��/� 6. owww"VA t Community Services Department L C.sfm.v/.#.ON t 2000 Main Street I.-. wl d.aq t Huntington Beach L W* I Orange : °1/"' LIMA I.whom , Califol-niA I*wt 92648 h�t Outdoor Recreation R.a.w - rww wow Vick Morris ty,►,r,i Acq•+ Oev• + and Planni • msa t 214 _ 536-5486 T. Tiru Ama otw itirna t OF Apmcmrs Rajiv L TM Of At'M' MUffJNtl:lPIVe A■801 N-cti w W%AdMN Apo" Huntington Central Park Acquisition. 0.uw0W ►•Nt"w f* tt w tMuMmm Acquisition of 150 encyclopedia lots for toe"o Irs-lowII expansion of Huntington Central Park. Total . ar,reaye 9.64 + Now sprn.+.a kftw E f.TM (W All IVA.'KR A■Yttm I" � 04ftwoM�m h w lowt " I-"w ��tw mt►�s 04M t>»+mM Mttwh) IS. AIIIA Of PWJECf IMPACT ?1 ww of vw6w twtm w, u. tJ11'iMAT[D NUM. AL IVral Of AI/NCAMN City of Runt,ngtoh Beat t °mot jI'S"a "t r�mtr Ir+a►Awdow ems" �tw ntw Is, ► mow r"ot" 148 t3owoQtMONAL t)IiTIIIM dot n. TTK o+ CXANQZ tr..tN.+$"I A•t...q Pow aoow tip i(Il t ►. Nf rw I.i xb. 4 �... NSA 1 ; wart ,w IL�tcr " », y+l'*°iR.�ir 24 rm.am s"'hos•'M 41 3�. �n MAI ATI To raw a*" An If% RIfTNA 1[oML 19VMF1tATtot+ WMVIN t. yvrtl ,ts Ftoi LL' °'t 01 so 83 11 1 N)A Il IL ""IMAL AGMT TO ntutltt MUM IMrw1l ai%So*.nr wh) tl, IttJAAlllls Aaoro National Park Servi a San Francisco. CA 94102 V00 2 M. twt if or w d"oho wt, n M wl w ow P&M&"oft 0 wo Mc tawpow w N. No r. xwr•.• t►:t w. tftrllw"w"c o. iw"O w Iw. groom.`wtw. " of 01611 dew.► w «A.w meow Ire o m+: "ww so Ar MCA P 00 etrw 0 * w fwwft WOW ti ttene"In IMT P. w6~A ft N ��s w dworNOW State Clearing Hol�3e 2L &"M wwt No mu L tgN1iMK .Wt 811IND emm CharlesW. 1homisson /�,4t,�,/ t� rem .�.•u► +r. ttrtrl►ctvt City Admini stratir L ` sl'K3 m3 24. wum mmtt Att►►1CA• rev "Ma An ws, oltsJwl>y►TIv+tAl wKT V.AowNnTtunvw orrtu >s. rnilcnnN sron a Aoototslw 8L tt�I t1QTAW at. AlttltlN TAtlldl JL M#M"o raw sow^ daw >wt, Tow we a rhos p.MOO . .ad IL Act+oors oA r► Is = p a IgJiM �AMtl�tt .Co JL aM CC FOR.+ A`twniw wL t•• w+su► twmtr i a A.Own rost .a Lim a t-taft A! », IIrsMAlt/m Aoo+w 13a1 Al- IL wnwt~rlsl L :e 1 a In wR 04"met�m..w t>.+a..+w ne+t..e M.0 ..�.►... ►►teax AittlRCy A•1'i Omev� ((ACIIAI ,bR1�CT *bM it tr R F:r,.M Ins!�w�A+ «rM1 1.Oil{wW /rf1. t;irr Ml I�i�►A�+m w+.l sz•:. ..firm ,..:• - . .- ... : ..:. ..; ., . .. .. , . . . .,,� '�; :�MaA Q{A,rps�� t*Qt'M A ►A t3 Rea. No. 5244 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COuffry of aKMZ ) e e CITY OF ft MINCTON BEACH } . I, ALICIA M. NENrWOQ'1'H, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of. the City of Huntingtoo beach, and at-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby c.tvaify that the whole nu'febar of w"bera of th* City Council of the City of Huntington Beach it seven; that the foregoing resolut:iou vat passed a�,,t adopted by the affirmative vote of wore than a wAjority of all the meobers of maid City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of March , 19 8 3 by that folloving vote: i AYIS: Councilmen: Thomas,, MacAllister Mandic Finlej. gaileX. Kell 4' NOW Councilsen: I' None ;t i ASSUrt Councilmen: Pattinson City Clerk and on-offioto Clerk f of the City Council of the City + of Huntington Seacho CalifMIS i� I j j t w.r�..... .•:....-,..,,,,,..r.....+..ac_.:s'::•..i.•.:_. .. ..... , r .I 1 - r '., S LCJf J r . . r, • REQUESii FOR CITY COUNCIL- ACTION Date February 23, 1983 Submitted to: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted 6 Y�: Charles W. Thompson, City Adininistra tX40 Prepared by: Vincent G. Moorhouse, Directors Community Services Subject: Huntington Central Park Sports Complex Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachmentmet/ STATEMENT OF ISSUE City Council has approved the development of a sports complex in Huntington Central Park. There is a need for Council to decide if such complex will be developed and operated in house or by private enterprise. RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to formulate a request for bid proposal for the private development of a sports complex in Huntington Central Park. ANALYSIS In August 1981, the City Council approved five recreation projects within Iuntington Central Perk: expand the shooting range , develop an equestrian center, a sports complex and a YMCA facility , and include fast food operations where compatible. The shooting range agreement with the Police Officers ' Association is in its last four years. The City Administrator is presently negot+ating with the Association con- cerning this facility. The YMCA and the city have entered into a long- term, lease agreement for the development of a YMCA facility which should be completed and open to the public in the early part of 1985. The equestrian center lease has been approved by Council and the center Is in construction. The i'ast food concessions will be developed at such time as there 13 a need. Of major concern at this time is a policy decision on the sports com- pinx. The primary issue is the availability of funding for this project. Due to an aggressive park development program in the past three years and a slow economy which has resulted in a considerable reduction in Park Acquisition and Development Funds , the city at this time does not have the $1 million, to build a sports complex. The Community Services Department has been. approached by two private fiiana interested in developing and operating a sports complex on a Tong-term contract. If developed by the private sector, the city would realize an annual Income of $150,000 from the sports complex. An estimated $200,000 per year in maintenance costs would be eliminated and the total cost of development- would be borne by the private developer. Such developer, in turn, would have the opportunity of making a profit, amortizing his investment over the term of the lease and, at the end of such lease, the total facility would revert to the city. � Mp iA1 i REQUEST FOR CITY COV:�CIL ACTION February 233, 1983 Page Two Subj : Hunzington Central Park Sports Complex In order to allow the private sector to operate such a facility , the city would probably have to grant certain concessions, such as, night lighting, controlled commercial advertising around the field, and consumption of fool and alcoholic beverages in a controlled envwron- merit . On the other hand, if Council desirer, the city to develop and operate the sports complex when funding is available, the city would realize ! approximately $219,000 net profit a year. Presently, the city oper- ates one of the rest softball programs in the county, if not the utate. The city is recognized as a lender in this field. It in felt , that the city could very well operate such a program at the sports I complex and make u good profit. The primary decision concerning the ` city' s operation of the facility is the willingness of Council to allow the Park Acquisition and Development- Fund to accrue certain }' monies and to place a high priority on the project. Before the city expends design money for the facility, this major policy decision must be made. Staff has formulated a five year park development program (Exhibit "A") . It in estimated that approximately $6.7 million will be needed In the next five years to complete this program, which doer not Include purchase of approximately 24 acres known as the mushroom farm property (estimated value : $6 .7 million). Based on the present building trends and projections for development through 1987 , esti- mated income will be $6.7 million. Therefore, all Indications show that if the city were to develop the sports complex, funds would not be available for such development before 1988. An alternative would be to delay other park projects to make funds available for the sports complex . Past experience has shown that such an approach has not been acceptable to residents who have waited several years for development of a neighborhood park. Private Development Advantages -- $1 million savings in development cost -- $40,000 savings if developer is required to construct parking lot -- $200,000 savinga in maintenance per year -- $150,000 income to city per year City► Development Advantages -- Control of development , operation and use of facility $219,000 annual income over expenses : Softball Leagues $490,000 eConceasiona 50,0.00 Sub Total $51100000 Less Expenses - 21LOOO (Officials & Maintenance) NET $219,000 01ncome based on $500,000 gross sales at 10 percent return. Concee- sionaires will develop at own expense. 1 ors /1 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION February 23, 1983 Page 'Three Subj : Huntington ,Cbntral Park Sports Complex I FUNDING SOURCE j Private developer; Par:c Acquisition and Develop..ment Fund ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1 . Authorize staff to proceed with city development of the sport' complex when funds become available according to the park develop- ment priority list (Exhibit "A") . 2. Delay park projects delineated in Exhibit "A" in order- to make E funds available for city development of the aportn complex. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit "A" - Five Year Capital Improvement Projects Location Atap VaM:MMB :ca I y r EXHIBIT "A" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FIVE YEAR P110QRAM July 1983 July 1988 Project Priority Estimated Cost Sub Total 1. Landscape Architecture $ 75,000 $ 2 . Landfill Operation 429,000 504,000 3. Newland Barra Vartlett Park 211113000 748,000 4 . Central Pare Land Acquinitiun 1,700 ,Cl0(1 211148,000 5 . McCallen Park 340,000 2 , 788, 000 6. Wleder Pax-Sc G 80,000 3,068, 000 7. !Manna n,g Park 157,500 3,225,500 8. Lamterr Park 124 ,000 3, 3119,500 9. Irby Park 107, 800 3,1157 ,300 lU. Gibbs Hature Ares 3110,000 3,797,300 11. Rancho View Park 2011 ,000 11 ,001 ,300 12. Lamb Park 53, 900 4,0559200 13. Park S1gns 3 ,000 110582200 14, Plarina Park Court Lighting 502000 4,108,200 15, Oolden West College Field Lighting 501000 4,1589200 16. Seely Fark Gate and Walkway 3 ,Oe10 4,1610200 17. Methane Gas Engineering Study at Landfill 100000 4 ,171,200 10. Central Library Pool and Planter Covivernion 90 ,000 4,251,m { 19. Bartlett Park 8113 ,000 501.043200 20. Huntington Lake Improvements 2509000 5,354 ,200 21. City Gym and Pool Site Acquislti.on 2509000 5, 604,200 22. Central Pork - Sully WIler Lake Develop- ment 975000 695795200 ESTIMATED INCOME JulY 1983 - July 1988 Income Fund BalPnce Ju1.Y 1, 1983 $ 5979300 July 1, 1984 $ 129101000 2,507,300 July 1, 1985 1,41112400 3948700 July 1, 1986 1,585 ,700 5:534:400 I July It 196 1,162,500 6,6962900 July 1t 1989 19064 ,700 7,761,600 _...•- .. ..� .. ..ti. .YY ^.".I:,i f.N.•Y•... �r+.-..n.........•... .. ..a a . i r f• fjf r1b.) c -IT 1AD1 P1 .lal L CF-E FN L lk CF-E T: • Elf lit CF-R T R LIOUT ITH-1-91 11 1411 TI t - f . . .�. ' ;�f I`I� I� � 1�;-� - r, 1�� � �`l ° i� ' i'� � ` •r� �!�+�;f•�t•,I� t - �,.i ,i;�� l - Aj CF-R , K fill ! lhl� I F-R CF-C EMU 111411 11,mv I! REQUES1 FOR CITY COUNCIL 40T40N Date November 30 , 1A i Submitted to: Vie 1lonor-able firayor :'Ili! Cit.; r'nttrlc t1 :,;. ,.4 �"►:►' t' c�raN Q Submitted by: Chita-lea Thomimon, Cite Ad►nirtin r:itC. Prepared by: Vincent 0. Moorhouse , Ulrcct:or �_..-�-�: �:►�, Comrnunity :1e1•vlcos Subject: i;eoclution Appr•ovin,•; A►,3>lictatlon for (Itaint Funds for Acquisition of {lcal {':�i�1)�'rt;/ feet• Expun::ion of• Huntington Central Paris ':totonnnt of Issue, pycammendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: FITATE:MF.NT 011 I:;r111, Orni t f und:a two nwiilnt)1u, t{1roul h the {le,ielly-Hnvt St:ate- , Uvivan :,nd Co:znt:al Tla;•k Dond Act of 1g'16 t'o: ic(jul: +tJnn of vnr.yolopodiu .loto in fit.; ington Cent:•rcl Nwlt . The v. lty ' :: a1)p1l.c;at1c,t• for• rrmnt Fund: rtu;t tee ,.wc.,rnpattiu.d by nn adopted v000lution (11' tart c,ottrlctl tht: applic:tt•loll . {:{;cattrtrtzn��:Io{I Adopt thc- rat:t:richoci lutiort -.P1iro. vin ; the city' : :application 1'or grant f'ttru.ln for .-tchulnItic;l of vilc,yc:lopc:cai;t lot; ; An 11untirlF;toil Cantral Park . /iNIALYSIS Thy: Stnt:c N-rirtrnent of Pr us .anti Rvci,etition Nun rtotif'i.e�d the Department 0!, Community ;'cr-vlco:: ! :►'it un(lc�r• Ow Cmatttl 1'ravk 11ond Act ()1' 1976, funds ill the rarrrcurit of ',�:', ++% 1 h:avc been allnented to the City of Huntington Beach lint. noklll { ^ t t:!oat 'incl•% r ci. 01' l'0C1•e)rat lorl7l 1'.ac ill tle:;. Thin pur•t:teulnr :,,:rant prc•F;t• vn voquirco oo trtatctling city I'm ids and incr•crt:tes the tot::al nmaunt, of gnint t'un(!:; npiwoved for- encyclopedi- lot •7erluisIt,.on to rat141{)ICJIZ ..",cl►Ftl�{. t ;Mate , lJr !,atr and t'cr�: t ,tl P.-iric Pond Act. of 1976. Ar,TEMIATTV1 ACS'ro,,i � M,tko a1)11ltc:at lollrt ;'a . :: ltt;; other than i{unt:infrton t'c.ntrtil Frirk . {�c•acelttt c�ra nn+i n,�i,!S ;�rtf. ! ter: V G M Vid ;c P:o c;ar X/ REQUESt FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION l Date ___.Sgjir.CtIIltiLL..7.j11. -.-1�3..,...�. ,f� Submitted tO: The Honorable 'layor and City Council ovi Submittal by: Charles 11. Thompson, City Administrsitor - „�Yjt"ll` Pisparedby: Vincent G. :loorhouse, Director, Conanunity Service a� ! u�tF" • Siebject. Huntington Central I'arl, llaster Plan I Statament of I.tsus, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachrmnts: j STATWUNT OF ISSUE There is a need for City Council to officially confirm a new nauter plan of develop- r-esnt for HoUtagtian Central Park In accordance with its action taken on August 11, 1981. RECOWMRN13AT ION Approve the Huntington Central Park Mister plan subject r.o the findings and con- 3itions of an approved EIR. AMLYS!S Thin Central Park master plan was developed at tile. direction of the City Council in order to provide guidance for long;-range. developmv,"t. Thies waster plan cvolvad over approximately two years of plarn.ing which included a substantial amount of staff, citizen and Council iaptit , an well as tiro pi-cparation of air economic feasf.- r bility study of revonue producing ueca for the park. The economic feasibility i study was presented to the City Council by Ultr4systems, Inc. in hay of 1981. i On the basis of information contarinud In the economic feasibility study, *he City Council an August 11, 198? , unanlmoersl, redirected ataf►`' to prepare a new master p1sn for I1CP to include existing urrcrr and the establishment of an equestrian canter, sports complex, YMCA facility, compatible fast food conce►esionw, parking and an expended shooting range. The: Council further direct-.d s ran lignment of HCP bound- aries to Include only a portion of the additional 75.3 screw proposed for expansion of the parkinthe Open Space Conr.ervation Amendment 80-1. At that same meeting, Council voted to place 25+ acres of land located at the: northeast corner of Goldenweat and E111.9 in a planning mode to allow for further .staff evaluation of alternative uses for the uite. Before the city can officially adopt a muster plan of HCP, it mutt first have an ipproved EIR. Said EIR has been prepared and com- pleted by Envlata and was submitted to tire city in July of this year. The Elk is being submitted ro tire City council for approval at the October 4, 1982, nmetingt. The purimse of the waster plan in to provide a gui.deltne for future development of HCP. The master plan can he amended from time to time depending; on development of the facilit!- and the City Council's deatre. This propoecd master plan reflects those uses t.:at rears approvied by Council at its August 17. 1981, meetings. The mile plan doeu not address uses in the proposed encyclopedia lot acquisitions-nor Itt the planning mode areas. tattJ�1ft � i l t INQUEST fOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Subject: Huntington Central Park Master Plan FUNDING SM11CH Nona. ALTRRXATIVS ACTIONS Deny tha plan, make recommendationn for alterations and rcf�r to staff. AITACHPW I.?'S Concel)tual master plan VCM:ca i is CRYjYARD' CONCESSION—, YOUTH CAMPING • ; 1 ii 1 NAT'IME ..1 AREA y :�I I ADV TURF ThdN a fC AR� 0, 1 1 = PLAY RO�UNC: Y► TItItHO hLYR 0 !! __ �f�O1RY14l �Tt•ARK:�; i = LISR Y- ii j ,�`�� ��( i;'1��� ,t`••,yt;,�P� :�.:,.� ! _- IM � RI:arAUAANT,= HUPR(�QTdN� ` � �� •�QTIVE� , 11 LAX �LAIIIDFILL r � .�! 1 - - I "�-PAfIKINti- 200 CARS E PA.N0 F,1 I ' a OOTM91 RAN4- 1 EQUESTRIAN ArD i�1iN HOd 1 CENTER ==- riS - -- K A INO - XPANIIM y __ r f PA ,f�l11littEp• i j MI RCIAJ.f T. SXISTMId AC IES nor ;TL i .av �• 0 14b0 ,. S I, ./• I CMTV OF HUNTINIGTON MEJOCH CA 82-12 COUNCIL • ADMINISTnATOR COMMUNICATION of k,,, To Ilonovahle Mayor and From Charles, W. :Thompson , City Cuunc:i 1 MoIn ors City AdminisL•rator Sultjata AC(!UIS1'1'1Ut; OP ."NC1'C1.01'1a-1IA I.O'1`S Clare Ilay 17 , 19112 At: tilt! Council mt!t!t i ncl of ,lu ly 20, 1991 , ('aunc i 1 .lutilt)ri.:-vd rlcclui,i tint► tllrowIII eminont dom.l in of 171, oncyc.lopodia lot.; 1oca ud north o1: Avonuo hvt.woon i1ol t:al;ard:; fc.1r th1: put•poso of ex- ha141.ituj rho Eli : nt lluntinytUtl C-•ntral I',1:-l: . 1,1111dinq for af!(lui:►it.ion tt!ado 1 ossiblu 01rclut1h St.aLo rlrant:: of 5906, 3.33 with City matching funds of %,295, 082, tot.alinq SL , 201 , 405 avtlilablo for ;.1ccluisitioll, We are pros eodit: to its qui rl' t:lln;ii! pl-c)I),'1"ti0,., KhiC11 i11.1Ut C1 t.}'-U1JI1l3d land and woult! W't' t lug Ii.%rl; hnuncl;iries as shown can tlht: ,attlic:hod mail. 1tespoct fill ly submitII'd, Chart � tr. lhoml .,t,n , City Administratnt- c ,T:pj At:ta c h In"!n t 1 !z �SECTICNAL DISTRICT MAP 34-5-II -" --� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP Reim- CF—R 4oft Am � �� .'i;'�j��l ;I1��!ill ,,�•��if�i4'��ii� 1 �.��_,_.r.:. _:,.-�� _� � ►,i� ill�1 a��rtt�o i A.T4*4 rO " AC99U/lW-40 Page Oil - Cnunci 1 tlinutc�s - 1/20/t1] AU t11SITln'1 01' El1CYC1.GPIDIA LOTS - Li1INEEE1 ULY•1t11N - IIUNIINGTON CENTRAL PARK - APPROVU) The City Clerk pr•eseltt.cl(l it co nllullication from the Cullummity Services Director rep}at•dit1;T the acc}uisitiull of elicycluj)uAia lots - litmLington Central Park. A motion vie% oudo by i1midic, scicc,rlctod by •ilwn.ls , to authorize acquisition througl emirlellL dowa ill nr 1711 lots (2:+' x l E 2' ) located north of Ellis I Avunuc b,-t1,�t:en Goldenta- L mid fcLrar•;Is SLI-00ls for Lhe purpose of ext,an�iin!) the 5iSe of Iluntin()tun C('11tI'JI t'ark. The motion carried by the following roll call vote. AYES: lltcAllister, lhum,ls , Pattirtsctn, Mantlic 11OLS: Ili i Icy ABSENT: Finley, ►.oily _ hi vlsloI OF tirNf(fs'ON1l000 f?R(`)fRVAT10'1 _1111.iA"RA11 TO MAIL REVOLVING LOAN POOL�� The Ci C)r!r { prt st�tltecf ,I c:u l�uunica tin+l frt>l1t t{1►� 11��vtllo}xncnt. Servi/- v(r2P r:- mh21)t - ){ 5 im; alld t�oullull i t y lloveltl}N);mt Division regat-d itrg 0 r evisilt! tic ighhorhor Pr ce urvotiun Prog)"In tr1 Lreatc a r vvnlvincl lo/Itilcoll"lize, A motion was t,t14c by (landic, socanded by Bailey, tc authorousing and Conumrli ty Uevel u}1`� llt s La ff to o-s t�a111 i sh a direct Home imp1 omi program 1st i 1 i zi ltg Comrluni ty lava lonl;umn 1. El lurk Grant. funds and to the use ol• all ;principal anti itlt�-est lutywents thus cleneraled for ytie tleighbar•hwd Presor- vatioll Program, alld W , 1t1101-i , iIn IwreaSv III Lhu C relit interest fates w*fercd 1 to property owners as fo1Tlgl, : I EUMMIL t:��ii'R01tY I � CREST (LATE 50 .,. ut• lel.s (i 'erred) Ei'. unti 1 title transferred 51:', - lit► t Irr over i Tltl� nwtiarl carried t�1 the f'vllawin, roll r11 vale; AYES: MacAl I istot-1 lhsissl.ts, attinson, Dailey Pundit ill)LS: Will! All`.rN1: FiitIoy, Kelly Bill AWARD - Ili'-;1AI.LAi 11 OF t 1 AtilllllG (1►'ACl1N5 U(i ifER AV L E Al BRADBURY N TRIM j I.AfI( :i t:Rt)SS��fr1r }:S - U. !iith S(fat{1' ,ti_ l.till{411iY ltlL _�. _, .. . Hit! City Clock 11 so Muni a contmmicatiur, flout the Director of- hI . 1Jorkl, I't•-. 1,lardinq Litt, irt� .,tl la ion of f hirihin1} liclacons an ilei l Avenue at llr dbury and Tr'ttdy Lanes osstr,jl).s. j /fo 3y Bailey, 4e(ond Thomas , Council' accepted the low bid of Ste' ty b thr awount of $11 ,191).Ofl for the installation of flashing beae s ormt- at Eiradlitiry and frudv Litnes crosswalks , hold M I other bids utioo nt' they contract and f it ing of bonds and directed the City Clr the unslrttrl,sfu'I t, ittJcrs anal rc�tln•n their hid bonds. The bids were j : 4 rJ� EJb aW., O NC1L ACTIo Ift- � E 4 z z LZ.,:3 lS. _._. MAR Q Z 198 Date march 1 , 1982 ��y HUtVTJI�Q1'ON B EN Submitted to: 'file Honorable i an e11 Mf wswrlyf orflCE Submittedby: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato prepared by: Vincent G. Moorhou.e, Director, Community Services . Subject: Resident Caretaker for lluntinE"ton Central Park Y Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Altetnati"Actions, Aitachmmu: Nil STATEMENT Of ISSUE Due to continuous find costly vanda_ism within public park systems, many arencies are amployinir re:ldent:ial caretakers to di:courage vandals by maintaining :t continuous, fnrnily ratmoophove on t1:e premises . RECOMIMENDATION Approve a one-year, ri lot progr sin Cor reducing vandalism by utilizing a residential caretaker in 11-unt1ngton Central Parh. Proposed location of caretaker residence is attached . ANALYSIS During F'Y 80-51 , vandalism uitltin the forty-seven city parks system has resulted in n cost of over ?100 ,000 to they city . Tile highest expenditure of $10,000 eras f`or Huntington Central Park. In art attempt to reduce the cost of vandalism, the Cotanunit.y Services Commission requested a survey of several agencier. employing a caretaker or security per;;onnel . At its, %pril 3 . 1981 meeting, the Corrinisnion recorranunded Council implement a pilot caretaker program. The estimated cost to t Le city to in:it:iate this type of program is $6 2000 for sewer- age, electricity, t•rater and telephone installation. Except .for month- ly telephone ner% lce , nr. other costs are to be borne by the city . FUNDING SOURCE ParY Acquisition and Development Fund , cureent balnnee as of 1/31/82 is $2, 1102, 568. (Account 790G01.) ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Increase number of parit ranger po:oit;iona to patrol park; 2. Establish police patrol of park during evening hours; 3. Increase light.tps within park. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed location for caretaker resiuonc3. VGM:NW:c CITY OR HUNTIN GTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMfAUNiCATION �rvrwc:uw axN To Charles W. Thomson From F. P. Arguello City Administrator Chief of Administrative Services' Subject Proposed funding for Resident Date March 4, 1982 Caretaker Pilot Program at Huntington Central Park FiR # 82-7 in responsa to the request of the Comunity Servlcts Department, 1 Am hereby submitting a rinancial Impact Report relative to the proposed funding for a one-year pilot caretaker program in Huntington Centrai Park. It has been estimated that an appropriation in the anount of $6,000 would be sufficient for this ptfrrose. There is an unencumbered balance in Account 190601 of $18,450.00 which may be used to fund this project. F. 0. Arguello Chief of Administra0va Services FDA/AAJcg i 6 a CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ` FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT I Project Name Resident Caretaker for Huntington Central Park Description —Proposed funding for resident caretaker pilot program nt Central .__. Park I I . DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 . 1 One-Time Costs Lanaurn. , ac Acquisition Constructlon ties E ul ^ent Other Total Cost 610O0 wA MMIYW WSW/YI. �W l.2 Recurring Annual Costs A ditlona Matar a s 6 utsldo j payroll Personnel Su ilea Services IZev nuc3 To al Cast 1 . 3 Replacement/RAnewal Casts r�rYwsw�/ V �.r...+� wrwrw�wrww 2. INDIP.ECT COSTS Logs of interest earnlnq p�otentlal due to expenditure of funds. .�� I 4ww+w►i�wwwww�.��� �.rw�w,.rF..w.w�A. 7 1 1 Ai Financial Impact Report t",b) . Page 2 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT The assumption Is that thy: fui 1 time presence of a res i cSec,t is t c.�retak$r may assist IQ rCcgU-Inn the fr .gijency and magnitude of vandal1sm in the Central Park area and substantially lessen the expenses Incurred by the City in rectifying the � danuc�c s. 12 w J rr .r i 5. PROJECT USAGE ..oily, w i 1 i 7 f 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING 1 Subsequent to City Council approval . ter., �'. COST Of NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT �hilthout the imnositlon of such a program, the City will either haw_ to look towards ! ,ntber ay n +qs for alleviating the vandal ism problems at the perk or contInue the f _warm-� ...�.�._.... � W .��^•` i N v R. I 1 � HUNTINGTON CENTRAL, PARK P� 1 0� r �r�►ttr � last Side) - ----,�- �. 1 W r• own 0 � ar r• 1 •• At ZI t<�f 0011'1 * • f�t 1!1�04A1 1 r7 K 1��i K �t ••r / Cke- ry►i t • 1 • ' HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARS{. . . • • i a6� Side) e • OA 0 Von • (f,�•p�i,.11 R7� A i p • • 1 i + r ' •sIF ♦• iIf ►• w e .e so t �✓ •' eni�r�l Libf+O ' CA • '} - b � b 'FALSE P,e..,� AVE. S �.1 4 REQUES i FOR CITY CC�iJf� 3CACT10 W� . Yl Date FQhr_Ua .. 11902 ._ Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council .1Y1'ItOYLD BY CITY coljNc,l�, Submitted by- Charles Thompson, City AdministratA �- 2.- .._ 19r2:7 Pt"wred by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Q TY CLX J Suboct: Appraisal of Encyclopedia Lots Adjacent to Central Park. Ststemont of ImA. Rawnmendation,Analysis, Fundirn Source, Ahirnative Actions, AyAahn*nu: Statement of Issue: Per City Council direction in September, 1981, a» Appr a1 report has been completed by Charles Davin for over 180 sma a logs •wl ' h are being considered for acquieltion for the expansion of Central k. Recomrr:endation: Authorize the payment of. $27 ,900.00 to Charles Da,iin for services per- for.mad in the preparation of an appraisal report for the encyclopedia lots adjacent to Central Park. Analysis: In September, 1961, the City Council authorized Charles Davis; to prepare an ,appraisal report for 186 encyclopedia loth north of Ellis Avenue between Goldnawestr and Edwards Street3. Mr. Davis 's appraisal report showed a total value of the lots to be $2,752, 500 which was significantly higher than the estimated $1 ,080,000 cost of this project:. Because of City Council and staff concerns, a critique of Mr, Davis'a report was done by Paul MacMillim, ;1,A.1 , This critique, a copy of which is attaehad, bas.i.cally agro-is with Oie conclusions of Mr. Davis. Because of ltmit.eclavailable fund,, staff is studyinq alternatives for partial accluisition of this proporty. Recommendations will be forth- coming so6n. Alternatives: Do not author izo payment for services rendered. Fundin_y source: State Park Bond Act funds al: •at_ed to this project, r CT:PEC:lw 71 Ilk l Ma ys� BEAC CIrW OF &1 A HUNTINGTON *•NI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 �•� � . � ` '. '- � a r'\ a ''' Grp fY � •� 1 itOti 7 1+II pal Iuul� U 1017 IIo U ul7 fJ t^17 'a .!� _ }t I.G11 y Dull I�I•'J In!II 1/OLtl.oll I161J — I+II7S: to J /Ot U011 1�,r, 11•e11 11 VIVO I•rd.1,,1!1•::•7 1 x a luu.l d � iiQN li" 1•, al IY IM'"1 , �itii7�./`?y�✓S' lilljJt I� IIL•!. 1:1111 W lenit`Iu it (X II'.lIJ tnnls �IMI �1 ,1�,ii.�.1 � I1,..•vr,ll •j tIII�If � • I�Mt IC I.0{iii�i-•III 2:ISe�Illtl.i,Iy� ►- f'Iulf � A, •: 7 OP i.t�l 11►��'1`Iini N I�Slul/lw w Sml w N '. .1►I I�Ii.Moo, u�l , ��i7u NUNIIINGTON CENTRAL PARK I ISO L ...... I i 1 I it ... TMMI T � � 1 6.m WM6�A I,.- Iw REV tI — •.A� �, r flwla•+.Lf,�AJl v�r•iM.+fr !•, ii I ,i M,n,- M I L.L.I N & AJSOCIATCS REAL ESTATE APPRAISE1IS PAUL G.Mac h11LLIN,M.A.I. 1182 S.E.t3ristol Stivet.Suite 201 GREGORY P,WINGERD. R.M. S,u,ra Ana,California 02707 DANIEL. KE:TCHAM 1114)952.25CS LILA LEE 171.1)957•25E.5 • i I Feb rIt:tl'). 19 f,)97 City of limitington Beach Mr. I'mil Cook Director of Pohl ic: Wod.t4 2 1)1)1) Ma i n St t•cct 1111n t ;llj;t u11 f)c:ac:il , C.;I l i t or11 i 1 Ite : Apprn. i s;i l Rev i ctv I1ltnriligt(111 C:mtr:l1 11.1r}: "`into 1 1 l.n t s" Dear Nr. {Cook : I t . ale writing, this lc�ctcr to c•rnl .'ir:n out• telel�honc cottvers,lt foil of yCstxl-d Iy mg,11-tliril; my review of the, aboVe rofe'ronced appra 1 s.i l . Th is ;1111irm `:1l wo.,; prv)1;11-ed by Mr. Cho rI vs H. 1)av i s :lnd dated Jautl:lry 20 , 1982 . I 1I IvQ I-C ltl tliv ,11111r,t 1 S:1 l r:-pot"t aml Gila I1 `,l'tl tile t1;1ta .11111 cull% I11Siolls. I I;:11•v not attempted to verif ;* i1t►y of tllr s;tles or otitcr tl;It:1 , nor i;iive i "f ctct � hrrkctl" � Vita property or cOn11 'l r;Ib 1 es . liras i t l 1 l y , 1 :lgroe with the ; C0,1C )n:; io11ti of the ippriiiser. I believc t.hc final r:llue ` est.imatcs ar-, within rca-t-on. '1'ht: r•c ;Ire two :trews tight [ %multi orrcr 4ontitruc:tivo crit. ici:;m, )Icmevcr; fir:, t . terms of Cinallcinl; .rez•c not givcit consicie,•rutiorl it-, s ud just. ing prices 11" 1.1 For the conlp;ll-ab les . 1 1)e l is vy ;1 st l ic1• in c,1 rr, ' I; ;1 purclt:I:e w o I i v v t1vvd cat' t roIst atal vs a c1mcc-:shm to tl:•_ boyar. The seller. does 1lot „ccl:ac . out" timely t' the-;(, c ; rctlm::t :lncc:: and I present wort It rapt Iysi s Of the 1,oto sh oil It 1-,c c::lleIII Itvd lath ,1 .111mIs :••(Iju.;tilivI)t f to the s,lles price. Of tile clevell CUtt11l;1r:1lileti , six ( # 11 .i , •1 , S , R 1, `)) involvvtl finall:• itig by the seller nml two ctlmparzibles ( I, 10 1; I ) tit) lint itldic.,lte if tbi•I,c H;ls r innile inl; or not . Sec:oltcl , the c;ulltp:l rilb 1 es s11oul d have been verif'ivd by grailtclrs and gi-m tees . 1'i1c: appr;liser Verified Al elvVvii snlos tllrt311g)1 t'C;11 CiCiltl' 411;1`nt.' , Iline by cmv ngorlt anti two by mlother. The re'lson fol' r .�erific;lti�n by the princi11;1ts i :: to determine the clot it',It ion elf' bu)'or ;lac) ;el lcr in keoping with .hc• tit, - 1-inition of market vanje . l t l 1 ;y j el' PAUL G !'•1,, MILLIN. MAI REAL ESTATE APPRAISER Mr. Paul Cook February 19 , 1987 Page Twu Again , I reiterate that the conclusions of the ' . appyciser are generally reasonable and justified in my view. I do not have any present or prospective interest in the subject propertios . Thank you for the opportunity of serving; you In this matter. 1105pectfully, Paul G. '1EW M .`A. I . I'GMidms I { i 'c