Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOlympic Skateboard Park - EIR 77-12 planning & environmental sciences E �`� r1vuJ CITY cum 3 DRAFT Environmental Impact Report • ON THE PROPOSED Olympic Skateboard Park • City of Huntington Beach, California (EI R 77-12) • •`i ® CITY OF H unTInG Ton E neH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 February 2 , 1978 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The enclosed draft Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for the City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning and Environmental Resources and is currently being reviewed for a 30-day period ending March 6, 1978. The report assesses the potential environmental effects 1 of a proposed skateboard park consisting of beginning, intermediate, and advanced courses, a pro shop, spectator seating for 2 , 000 people , and appurtenant parking on a 12 acre site in Huntington Central Park. In order to -determine all possible environmental impacts associated with this project, we are soliciting your comments in writing no later than March 6, 1978. If comments have not been received by this date, we will assume you concur with the adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report. j Thank you for your time and cooperation. Sincerely, 'James R. Barnes Assistant Planner JRB/s Enclosure 7 a ' • O ao d v F w 10 � February 1 , 1978 0 City of Huntington Beach u Department of Planning and a Environmental Resources ® a P. 0. Box 190 O Huntington Beach, California 92648ta OREf • Attention: James R. Barnes planning& d environmental sciences to Subject: Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Proposed Olympic Skateboard Park Q v 0 3 • Dear Mr. Barnes: 0 a c This letter serves to transmit our environmental impact report on the subject ° 0 project. • The report has been written in conformance with the provisions of the Cali-. fornia Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines, and particularly in accordance with the expressed desires and procedures established by the City of Huntington Beach. The report is a summary of our investigation, reflecting the effects on the current proposal. Assessment was made of • both the adverse and beneficial effects on the proposed development. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions regarding any aspect of this report, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, • ENVISTrC. • Tim Welch Environmental Planner TW: sr E-300 • DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE PROPOSED OLYMPIC SKATEBOARD PARK IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA (EIR 77-12) • • s February 1 , 1978 • Prepared by: • ENVISTA, INC. 1745 Orangewood Avenue, Suite 210 Orange, California 92668 (714) 639-8100 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE SUMMARY 1 • 1 .0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3 1 .01 Project Proponent 3 1 .02 Project Location 3 1 .03 Project Characteristics 3 2.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, ENVIRON- MENTAL IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES 9 2.01 Geology 9 2.02 Topography and Drainage 18 2.03 Traffic and Circulation 20 2.04 Land Use and Compatibility 29 2.05 Visual and Aesthetics 38 2.06 Safety 41 2.07 Public Services 45 2.08 Economics 48 2.09 Energy 52 2. 10 Noise 54 3.0 TOPICAL ISSUES 56 • 3. 01 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts 56 3.02 Growth-Inducing Impacts 57 3.03 Alternatives 57 4.0 REFERENCES 61 • 4.01 Bibliography 61 4.02 Persons and Organizations Consulted 61 5.0 APPENDICES A. Traffic Study B . Initial Study C. Letter from Huntington Beach Fire Department D. Letter from Huntington Beach Police Department E. Noise Study • LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE • 1 Regional Location 4 2 Vicinity Map 5 3 Site Plan 7 4 Regional Fault Map 10 5 Local Fault Map 11 6 Earthquake Epicenter Locations 14 7 Organic Soils Map 15 8 Existing City Bikeways 24 9 Master Plan of Bikeways 25 10 Views onto the Project Site 30 11 Aerial Photograph 31 • 12 Views of Surrounding Land Use 32 13 Huntington Central Park 33 14 Zoning Map 34 15 General Plan Land Use Map 35 16 Design Alternative 59 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 Project Characteristics 6 2 Maximum Probable Earthquakes - City of Huntington Beach 13 • 3 Estimated Ground and Base Rock Motion Characteristics - City of Huntington Beach 17 • • SUMMARY • The proposed project is the development of a skateboard park on approxi- mately 12 acres of currently vacant land in the City of Huntington Beach. The • site is within Huntington Central Park. The primary environmental concerns of this project will be traffic and circulation and land use compatibility. • Impacts on traffic and circulation resulting from the proposed project are the increased level of traffic volumes during special events and the need for • bike trails leading to Central Park. Signalization of the intersection of Talbert Avenue and Golden West Street, implementation of proposed future bikeways, and assistance by the Huntington Beach Police Department for traffic control • during special events, are expected to mitigate this project's impact on traffic and circulation. Potentially significant impacts on land use compatibility might result from • a change in the nature of park uses. Existing park uses surrounding the pro- ject site represent a passive nature of park development. The implementation • of the proposed skateboard park could act as the initial phase for introducing more active land use facilities into the Central Park scheme. Currently, no master plan for Huntington Central Park exists to serve as a guide in directing • the design and implementation of future park developments. Other impacts of this project include those resulting from noise and safety. • 1 • The visual character of the project site will be altered by this project. • The project site is currently vacant and serves as open space in Huntington Central Park. Potential adverse visual impacts exist from glare produced by floodlights and spectator viewing stands along Golden West Street. A land- scaped buffer around the perimeter of the project site should effectively screen the project site from surrounding uses. Entry signs. fronting the facility and the pro shop building will be designed in the same architectural style as Huck's • Hangout. This will maintain architectural continuity with the already existing park structures. • • • • • • 2 • • SECTION 1 . 0 • PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 .01 Project Proponent • The proponent of the proposed project is the Huntington Central Park Concession Company of Huntington Beach, California. • 1 .02 Project Location The proposed 12-acre project is located in the City of Huntington Beach • in Central Park at the intersection of Talbert Avenue and Golden West Street (Figure 1 and Figure 2) . The project site is situated on the west side of Golden West Street, directly opposite Talbert Avenue. • 1 .03 Project Characteristics The proposed project is the development of approximately 12 acres of • currently vacant land within Huntington Central Park. Huntington Central Park is owned by the City of Huntington Beach. • Commercial and certain recreational facilities within the park are leased to the Huntington Central Park Concession Company, which is responsible for develop- ing and operating recreational and restaurant facilities in the park. • Huntington Central Park Concession Company has subcontracted with Universal Skate Parks, Inc. for the development of a skateboard facility to be located on the proposed project site. • 3 i -PLE r 4-'U- A e- e if PROJECT SITE nlnx T mo—ol Cv rw • FIGURE REGIONAL LOCATION NO. . 1 6nwvita planning&environmental sciences � f s +---r _err-- z: -- I-�• �...�-- � � -d Sch j Colle S n lew • 21;�Y TUR! / � I wf fR� -'. '9 AVE 3, � -� /4.:- � .n � �I. MORAF I 00 I � -- .... _ Q w ti Z BR i D. A i ( ,g -7__ H_1 • 1 -SH L !` OR 7 LI � __ � i;••.1. Q _ o •� � r I II entry Cl _ — 4 ocEd /`7 CFIAN H ... . - e in m _ /O■ - =Rancho N �J I� III TraileV ` : ;� ater Sch 1 h t LQ Park•/ / 2 1 2 ■. .I .r• V % NER a - - AVE+ •\ }... an• t 6 - •1 R e l Well W- ` r1-5 can Vi w 5 •. III .II `� f \�,.. 'J r y Lark Vle Ll C Tra+le o t ` ... i ..... ... Par _��. .. U) WSW ! s r -o P ' ■ LLIILLJJ I QO 1 .le :•C 1 38 a ' � welt• �. ��' � �'° ..�..: 9`e` ... ..• J'� PROJECT SITE ,.—Tall_ ,,��: ���/ '`•�•r.'....•• ••N• •ANC/ ' / Iv ' � �a/ v�I• m e � - ------- - - .p�PCrest V 55 i��; 9 LIIII Je fJ��10• ��C G i• •11: °�B:` • °, - �_ .. -_ >\� / [ If/n �....,•,....• :•III C J W i Z ~. _ ...... Z • _ � L c �� � 9'C I (66�''%��p L' ��,°r� '�'� - /—SO , entg' •�°• Y.e� �V4 ,I ;°oov¢n� _o, / `�°d ° o� 60,n 50 01 °�.O•°aye O .o • ii .d ° \ P _°O o o•• o° °o 05'�aile 11 `T CT. 1°o o0 0 o o_ °o° F ., ark l i •O ••� ° o to o ° �•� o l ° ° .' o° o•Uo' y ■`� / r •--S• hll�l vrrvmra+�mn .+�. o ro .., _ moo• L—�••• - ;.'-� -Ji71 . FIGURE VICINITY MAP No. 2 � USGS QUAD, MAP SEAL &I*ta AND N EW PORT BEACH planning&environmental sciences • The proposed Olympic Skateboard Park characteristics are summarized • in Table 1 . TABLE 1 • PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS Project Size 12 acres • Pro Shop 2,000 sq. ft. Beginning Course 20,000 sq. ft. • Intermediate Course 22,000 sq. ft. Advanced Course 30,000 sq. ft. Slalom Run 22,000 sq. ft. Parking 2 acres The project design includes 85 paved parking spaces and an additional • 110 overflow parking spaces on adjacent grass area. Spectator seating will accommodate up to 2,000 people. The pro shop building will serve as an ad- ministration office, first aid center, and will include restroom facilities for participants and spectators. Figure 3 is the conceptual plan for the proposed skateboard park. Vehicular access to the site will be from Golden West Street. Street improvements along Golden West Street, fronting the project site, will be provided by the City of Huntington Beach as part of the project. • 6 • T srnLe iHt 30 LEGBND • O 6�`+.-o cn.pynly erl O �nepLlr, we.•.vr au.ac VIEWING STAND (2�j) � ) PRaa SKATE /:iiK:. •w.a�w. SLALOM RECOVERY �`+"''�'-" 0N•n�y w PRO SHOP • • •YwIT tW u,•��_ VISWI O 7TP..� al..l.n .�q�.J.._.. '� BTA OB RECOVERY ATINO p TUBE v LOPKINM SKATE BASIN EXPERIMENTAL PARKINGRPLO - ��/\ BUFFER • _ (�I`, /) (�A/J i _ _ 3/4 TUBE V BUFPaR FREE • - - - � m P 0 -_ SKATE Co �. BOWL 0 0 • r � w GOLDEN WEST SENT Y SKATE COURSE III 7B�OEEP BOWL VIBWING STAND • • FIGURE SITE PLAN No. Ro 3 planning&environmental sciences • The skateboard park will be operated on a "session" basis. Users of • the park will pay an admission charge which covers a specified time period. The developer estimates that between 350 and 500 persons are the maxi- mum number which will be at the park at any one time excepting the special • events. It is anticipated that special events will be held on a quarterly basis. The facility will be equipped with lights for evening use, will be fenced for controlled access, and have a public address system for announcements and • music. It is also proposed that bike racks to accommodate 150 bicycles will be installed. • • • • • • 8 • • SECTION 2.0 • EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES • 2.01 Geology 2.01 . 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The City of Huntington Beach lies toward the northern end of the Peninsular • Range Province. This geomorphic province is characterized by northwesterly- trending mountains and valleys bounded by ancient faults. Locally, Huntington • Beach rests on recent alluvial materials deposited by the Santa Ana River and upon mesas of older Pleistocene sediments. The mesas stand topographically higher and were formed as the Santa Ana River meandered across the land, • downcutting into older sedimentary rocks. Later, sea level changes and local uplift were responsible for their present relative elevations. Pleistocene earth units consist of marine and non-marine deposits characterized by shallow marine • and near-shore stream deposits. These deposits consist of fine-grained silts, clays, peat layers, and coarse sand and gravels, respectively. Organic mater- ials such as peat are characteristic of marsh and back-bay environment. Regionally, the area is influenced by three major active fault systems: the San Andreas, Whittier-Elsinore, and the Newport-Inglewood (see Figure 4) . • The City of Huntington Beach is located directly astride the Newport-Inglewood Structural Zone (see Figure 5) . The term "Structural Zone" implies that the • 9 • \ tl (� � Sn s ; ra " Jac a'_'o/ s cinto e� 3 nando F 0 ault_ Pry \ Fault \rya —; ,.d`/ '�d4�EagIe Rock � /e Fault .��. ...` x ` � / Madre / Fault i-=r :`R of aYmon �; x x San o /�� g q" R • - i '� i xv..u.. e' ,n........ F W ,r c '� h�ttre O PROJECT SITE oz " t 4NN G 6. . a . . // ==fit'-)oE"$; ., FIGURE • REGIONAL FAULT MAP NO. Erwifta 4 planning&envlrogmental sciences O HIGHEST SEISMIC RISK (GREATEST SURFACE RUPTURE `�,,4 •,�/ j' +.�'� eta° POTENTIAL WITHIN CITY tom/ ©AREA OF INTENSIVE SHEAR --BURIED TRACE OF FAULT (WITHIN 40MV ZONE) ©UNCERTAINTY AS TO EXISTENCE \ f `•� + ` OR EXTENSION OF FAULT , lo -0 PROJECT SITE P E �' `_ sf ��SpfP .--'_�--�--? - �10�:•'-'ram __ --�� �. f ,w.:.���_- -�"�'�_-- -.-/' •` .r- �'�. r-� _ 'tr._ tom`` - - %9 r?-Z L`i.�1 - •fir• �C�--r-' ` `��` - \ '---- ----------- '�� _ >_ _ _SOUTH- ANCH FAULT_ _ • ` I -- -_--•--__--•--•---_.. ---- �__---_ -- ----------- - •= „--� T----ti - _ ? ----- �F �t. _wnwur st •.�;;.`fir f- O � - - ----------- LOCALT FAULT MAP _T CAZC) QC Source: Geotechnical Inputs • Huntington Beach Planning Depa rtment planning&environmental sciences A Newport-Inglewood Fault is not just a single break but consists of many minor • faults that cover a certain distance laterally and thus directly affecting that area during an earthquake along this system. Figure 6 shows the locations of epi- centers from historical earthquakes. • Table 2 illustrates the approximate relative distances of the faults to the project site, historical, and expected future magnitudes for these potentially active fault systems. • 2.01 .2 Environmental Impact Presently, a detailed soils and geology study has not been conducted for • the proposed project site. Considerations as to the soil stability, liquefaction potential, and ground shaking/surface rupture potentials due to earthquakes need to be addressed in detail for the proposed project. • The proposed skateboard park facility includes a pro shop/sales office building, a paved parking lot, and concrete skate courses that will require foundation recommendations. Soils at the project site are expected to be moder- ate to highly expansive. Construction of the skateboard park will require a certain amount of • grading to create the proper slopes and courses as well as to insure proper substratum and fill compaction. Figure 7 indicates that some peat material may be incurred during grading operations. • Local seismicity produced from the Newport-Inglewood Structural Zone could result in surface rupture and liquefaction. While presently, no potentially • 12 • • • • • • • • • • • • TABLE 2 MAXIMUM PROBABLE EARTHQUAKES CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Approximate Distance Maximum Magnitude of Maximum Probable Fault Zone From Project Site Historical Earthquakes Earthquake Magnitudes Newport-Inglewood 0-3 6.3 6.6 (1933) w Whittier 21 3.2 6.8 (1971) Elsinore 25 5.5 7.2 (1938) San Jacinto 50 7. 1 7. 5 (1940) San Andreas 53 6.5 7.7 (1948) Source: Geotechnical Inputs, Huntington Beach Planning Department. • FAULT • GARDEN G111' All V 4.0 R SEAL BE�~�' .•�'Va � 0 IN a. �'' VA L• •,., • ••.-, HUNTI NGTON BEACH .::•. r.. y. • �' , G(�S MESA • 4.0 NEW R �.e 14.5B CH • a.o .qV FIGURE • EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER LOCATIONS Na 6 Source. Geotechnical Inputs En*ta Huntington Beach Planning Depa rtment planning&environmental sciences o PROBABLE LOCATION of PEAT (AREA&DEP`M LIN104 A" ,9 M 112 to 5 MCK LNER OF PEAT , 5 TO 25 THICK UWER OF PEAT °•, y��+/ <' / /, O OVER 25 RXX LNER OF PEAT �� ` � �` . '� M MARSH-1925.1905,OR1901 NFEIM BOLIrDARY 4 PROJECT SITE l 1 \ 1 a 1 ORGANIC SOILS MAP z� p11 Source: Geotechnical Inputs ewa Huntington Beach Planning Department planning&environmental sciences active branch faults of the Newport-Inglewood system have been identified within the boundaries of the project site, the Bolsa-Fairview Fault lies within one-half mile to the south (see Figure 5) . Table 3 records the expected magnitudes and durations of ground motion associated with earthquake faults for the City of Huntington Beach. The liquefaction potential depends upon many factors, in addition to ground- water level, such as soil type, relative density and intensity, and duration of ground shaking. Generally, low areas of poorly consolidated recent alluvium within one mile of the coast are considered to have high liquefaction potentials. 2.01 .3 Mitigation Measures A detailed geologic investigation, reporting on the above mentioned con- ditions, needs to be conducted for the project site. This study should include. mitigation measures for the grading phase and foundation and seismic design recommendations for the construction phase of the skateboard facility. lb lb 16 TABLE 3 ESTIMATED GROUND AND BASE ROCK MOTION CHARACTERISTICS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Estimated Maximum Base Estimated Maximum Predominant Period Probable Duration Causative Rock Acceleration Ground Acceleration Of Base Rock Motion Of Strong Shaking Earthquake Fault (g) (g) (seconds) (seconds) Newport-Inalewood 0.65+ 1 .00 0.30± 19 0.90 Whittier 0.21 0.30 0.30± 22 Elsinore 0.20 0.35 0. 35± 30 San Jacinto 0. 10 0.18 0.45± 40 San Andreas 0. 10 0.20 0.50+ 46 Source: Geotechnical Inputs, Huntington Beach Planning Department. • 2.02 Topography and Drainage 2.02. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site is characterized by an east-west trending knoll with lowlands to the north and south, which gently slope to the west. Elevations on • the site range from approximately 5 feet above sea level on the western portions to about 50 feet at the top of slope on the eastern boundary. Neither the project site nor surrounding park areas contain any improved • drainage facilities to handle surface runoff. Surface drainage flows off-site toward the southwest where it is either absorbed into the open meadows or finds its way to Huntington Lake. 2.02.2 Environmental Impact While the project site will require some grading, the project design will make use of existing landforms whenever possible. This will act to minimize the amount of grading and alteration to existing landform. Presently, there is no grading plan for the proposed project. However, the design plan does not • suggest that landform will be significantly effected as a result of the proposed project. Runoff from the project site will increase due to the construction of imper- meable surfaces such as roofs, parking areas, and skateboard courses. This runoff will be directed into surface and subsurface drains that will be terminated at the surface along the western boundary of the project site. 18 2.02.3 Mitigation Measures Slopes will be planted to minimize erosion. All drainage facilities and systems will have to meet the requirements of the City of Huntington Beach. Adequate controls should be designed and constructed to eliminate erosion of areas immediately adjacent to the site. Possible design alternatives might include a series of small catch basins within the landscaped buffer zone, thus dispersing the amount of surface runoff. The use of rip-rap in these basins would further mitigate erosion potentials by decreasing the velocity of flow. Another alternative might be channeling, by use of graded swales, surface runoff from the project site into Huntington Lake. 19 2.03 Traffic and Circulation • The firm of Weston Pringle and Associates was retained to prepare a traffic analysis of the proposed project. A copy of their report appears in its entirety in Appendix A. The information contained in this section is a summary of the traffic report. Individuals desiring a more detailed analysis of traffic impacts are urged to read the report in Appendix A. Another source of information on traffic concerns is the letter from the Police Department which appears in Appendix C. The Police Department identi- fied parking as the major concern with traffic and circulation. It should be noted that the Department's letter was written early in the environmental review process, and the Police Department may wish to make additional comments based on the analysis presented in this report. 2.03. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site is located immediately west of the intersection of Talbert Avenue and Golden West Street. Regional access to the project site from Pacific Coast Highway and the San Diego Freeway is provided by Golden West Street. Golden West Street currently carries 17,000 ADT (Average Daily Trips) north of the project site and Talbert Avenue carries 4,000 ADT east of the project site. The intersection of Talbert Avenue and Golden West Street is controlled by a three-way stop with flashing warning beacons facing all three traffic approaches. 2.03.2 Environmental Impact The major impacts of the skateboard facility will be the generation of up to 3,600 trips by mopeds and cars during major spectator events and demand 20 r for parking spaces during the major events. Special traffic control and park- ing arrangements will be needed to properly accommodate volumes anticipated for major spectator events, which may occur up to four times a year. With the exception of these major events, the proposed on-site parking and traffic signal will be sufficient to serve the proposed project. Another potential problem will be a need for bike trails leading to Central Park several years before the City's Master Plan of Bikeways indicates that they will be constructed. The traffic consultant has estimated that up to 3,000 people might attend the major spectator events proposed to occur at the skateboard facility. Based on the ratio of people to cars observed at other Orange County skateboard parks (see Traffic Report in Appendix A) , the 3,000 people create a demand for 600 parking spaces. There are only 195 spaces proposed as part of the skateboard facility, which leaves a deficit of 405 spaces. This deficit would have to use other parking lots in Huntington Central Park and on-street parking along Golden West Street north of Talbert Avenue. These other parking lots are the main and auxilary library parking lots, the existing lot jolt south of the skate- board park site in the mesa, Huck's lot, and the lots off Gothard Street and Slater Avenue. These lots have a total of 532 spaces. On a warm, sunny Saturday in January, filled spaces were counted between 3:00 p.m. and 3: 30 p.m. This count indicated 224 cars, which leaves 308 empty spaces (see Traffic Report in Appendix A for a lot-by-lot tabulation) . On Golden West Street, between Talbert Avenue and Slater Avenue, there is approximately 4,000 linear feet of 21 curb. Based on 35 linear feet per car, this could accommodate 114 cars. The total spaces available totals 422, and the need totals 405. This leaves a very minimal surplus, and would necessitate a long search for a space by these people arriving late. The proposed on-site parking facilities will be sufficient to handle normal usage of the skateboard facility. Weekend use of the facility will result in a need for up to 100 parking spaces at any one time. This demand can be adequately handled by the 85 marked spaces and 110 overflow parking spaces proposed as part of the project. Weekend traffic to the proposed project will increase traffic volumes at the intersection of Talbert Avenue and Golden West Street. This increase will warrant the installation of a traffic signal. If a signal is not installed, the inter- section will become congested, and hazards to pedestrians and bike riders traveling through the intersection will be increased. If the intersection is sig- nalized, there should be efficient and safe flow of automobiles, pedestrians, and bikers. Even with a traffic signal, the intersection will not operate smoothly during major spectator events. It may be necessary to have a police officer present to direct traffic during these major events. The skateboard facility will generate significant amounts of non-auto ' traffic. People will arrive at the skateboard park via bicycles, mopeds, buses, and on foot. Signalization of the Talbert-Golden West intersection will increase 22 the safety of access for these people. Provision of 1 SO bike racks is included in the proposed project. This will be sufficient to handle all bicycles and mopeds during normal usage, but will not be sufficient to handle demand during major spectator events. During these events, the excess bicycles and mopeds, which could number up to 270, will either be locked to poles, trees, and the chain link fence, or they will be left unguarded. A potentially significant safety and circulation problem could be created by the significant amount of bicycle and moped traffic to and from the skateboard facility. The problem is that an adequate bike trail system does not currently exist, and Is not planned for construction for several years. Figure 8 presents the existing bikeway system, and Figure 9 presents the Master Plan for Bikeways. In order to adequately serve the skateboard facility, the phase two bikeways along Golden West Street north of the project site and along Talbert Avenue east of the project site, and the phase three bikeway along Gothard Street must be constructed. The City may desire to advance the construction schedule for the Gothard Street bikeway in order to serve the hitherto unanticipated heavy bicycle and moped traffic generated by the skateboard park. It should be noted that the bikeway along Golden West Street north of Central Park will connect with a bike trail that will travel through Central Park. The heavy traffic during special events may create safety problems for • bicycle and moped riders. If cars park along Golden West Street in the area striped off as a bikeway, the bicycle and moped traffic will be forced out into 23 e fo c- y e�y0 ttPooE f�r91'O E�`r "j9cya4� ���� �940J. v`�f C 1♦i 1 ♦ %fti P arysn 1`♦` ♦r♦i �I� r♦i♦ lot I♦i EQ BOMWAYS `1 ♦r♦`1 1� t ♦�1 d� . `1 ♦ ''♦`♦ u 940 1 '♦'♦' tiEQ afoot 1`♦`1 ♦i♦� y�P �Gfsi 1`1 ♦'♦ `OEQ. Bar 1�1 '•� `P y9f0�♦ � 1 ♦ C �1 ,♦�♦ E`ti tior'y ` ♦ � ♦1 r♦ oo� 1`1 ♦` PROJECT SITE �• Z Oi,V`♦ 1�• r EXISTING CITY BIKEWAYS 00z6 11D Source: Trails Implementation Plan • Huntington Beach Planning Q Depa rtment planning&environmental sciences a a � LEGEND C°�OF .�♦,♦ ♦•® �� PHASE 1 (IMPROVEMENTS) y~k'�Sl 5P °lQq° ♦`♦ •♦, ♦• b ♦�■ tit t♦�♦ �a ■���■ PHASE 1 (NEW CONSTRUCTION) ro°� ♦/♦ fi>.t®`♦ ♦/♦,�®`♦ ♦� �♦ '♦, tsp� ■��•PHASE 2 e'♦ ♦ ♦`., ♦ ♦�♦` ♦� •• • • PHASE 3 i ♦ . �♦ �♦ Note: The route numbers correspond to Figure 2-7 ♦/�� �♦ .♦ in the Trails Implementation Plan Document �4 .♦ ryb 1 . s ♦i `' sr O by 9 rti �� b ♦,♦/ �� 011, .�♦ ♦, ♦.♦ b rL1 ��♦ P� b� ♦/e♦` `,� �1 'O,♦ r�0 �q by pp P "� ♦�� PROJECT SITE �• Z •• ni fb • • h •� b ♦ °F � 9 MASTER PLAN OF BIKEWAYS CDz pi QC Source: Trails Implementation Plan • Huntington Beach Planning Depa rtment planning&envirorvnental sciences A the traffic lane. If cars park properly, there will be opening car doors into • the bike lane and other conflicts between the cars and the two-wheeled vehicles. The traffic report in Appendix A indicates that 15 percent of skateboard park attendees will either use buses or walk to the skateboard park. The traffic report also states that the 15 po percent probably underestimates this type of access, which may actually be as high as 25 percent. OCTD provides access to the site via Route 25, which runs from north Orange County to the beach on Golden West • Street. Route 25 intersects 16 east-west routes, which makes it possible for much of Orange County to reach the skateboard park by bus with just one transfer. The final circulation impact of the proposed skateboard park effects all of Huntington Beach. The intention of the proposed facility is to provide a desirable and affordable skateboard facility in order to reduce the amount of skateboarding • that occurs on public streets. The mandatory use of safety equipment at the proposed facility will increase the number of skateboarders that own and use • that equipment and may increase the safety-consciousness of skateboards. How- ever, unless bikeways and/or sidewalks are provided leading to the skateboard park, accidents involving automobiles and children may increase in the vicinity • of the project site. 2.03.3 Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures would increase the safety and efficiency • of traffic flowing past the project site: (1) Signalize the intersection of Talbert Avenue and • Golden West Street. 26 • • (2) Construct the bikeways along Golden West Street, • Talbert Avenue, and Gothard Street as indicated in the Master Plan of Bikeways as soon as possible. (3) Provide a police officer to direct traffic flow during • all major spectator events. (4) Provide a map of all Orange County Transit District routes at the skateboard park to facilitate and en- courage use of OCTD buses. The parking problem during major spectator events could be mitigated • by: (1) Use of other Central Park parking lots. (2) On-street parking along Golden West Street between • Talbert and Slater Avenues. (3) Construction of additional Central Park parking, such • as at Huck's Hangout. (4) Construction of a major overflow parking lot in con- junction with a fast-food or family-style restaurant in • Central Park. (5) Use of the Wintersburg High School or Golden West College as an overflow parking facility with free tram ' service to the skateboard park. (6) Hold all special events on Sunday when the library is • closed, which will provide an extra 165 spaces. 27 • (7) Reduce the size of special events and spectator seating to a level compatible with existing off-street parking capacity. (8) Eliminate special events if they create parking and circulation problems. 28 r 2.04 Land Use Compatibility 2.04. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site is a vacant, undeveloped portion of Huntington Central Park. It is bounded on the north, west, and south by park land developed for ia variety of uses (see Figure 10) . Golden West Street borders the project site on the east. Several different land uses exist in the vicinity of the project site. Central Park is bounded by residential neighborhoods to the north and west, by indus- trial uses to the east, and by oil fields and stables to the south (see Figure 11) . Within Huntington Central Park, the project site is located west of the Huntington Library, across Golden West. Southeast of Talbert, the land is currently vacant and serves as a temporary overflow parking facility for the library (see Figure 12) . In the past, this site has been used as an unauthorized dump. North, west, and south of the project site, several recreational facilities have been built, while others are still in the planning stages. Figure 13 desig- nates the activity areas for this portion of Huntington Central Park. Zoning in the project vicinity is shown in Figure 14. The site is currently zoned CF-R. This designation indicates planned community facilities for recrea- tion. Surrounding -goning, as shown in Figure 14, is predominately for residen- tial and recreational uses. The Land Use Element of the Huntington Beach General Plan currently designates the site as public use/open space (see Figure 15) . 29 r i —s+�-:?4..^�.• v" .`a+ Gar .,yyi. 31- -y 3 .. 9 `xi {?, r y.-,. �'' e�i �u `�•'x �*a w Tl y telift r. s111A. �" �, ``'�+"','. 1 . T, VIEWS ONTO THE PROJECT SITE '��.�.:J'..*r l `I `T„ � L" *.i h`yr•-a�..y `L., .� _ 4 Yy z.� .� 11}} A }j Y ♦ .�}�� , I t�t" a1�P�u ,S, •M (� tx���i' �, }r' �s ' ,s �4- r •'� �' -`� � �X rp e•µ7 <��F+i}{y �3 = C�+ "� �� � � $yam'\f � ```E "` �.`•�," lf now I( i ems' • �<_. --;� $ � �- � .Z � °r.r��� ,vim �" 7777777777 HUNTINGTON LIBRARY/GOLDEN WEST E TALBERT OPEN MEADOW t� £ NATURE CENTER BUILDING FIGURE VIEWS OF SURROUNDING LAND USE No. 12 Er*Ka a planning&environmental sciences AT[B AVE. L_ ftd l P. r • � �;I�! 11 nhal Llbery re 9 •'\ I : C .J VFW .i �. •. TALB[IRI[XIITIMB) -AVE. • I AVl.. ! PROJECT SITE mo)- 1. Huntington Lake ! 1 2. Thomas B. Talbert Lake i I 3. Jack Green Nature Observation and P a Kground I l ' 4. Jake R. Stewart Viewpoint and Picnic ea j o`•' S. Alvin M. Coen Group Campground 6. Donald D. Shipley Nature Center i 7. George C. McCracken Meadow and Pla3 ground i 8. Henry A. Kaufman Playground and is Area j 10. Henry H. Duke Trail ) 11. Jerry A. Matney Mesa a • FIGURE HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK No. 13 Source: Huntington Beach General Plan &I*ta planning&environmental sciences • � VI— t O CAPSTONE OR. �• IR11 M I JJ RI 3 r. RI Im.oo TD E REIMp( .,Y.,.......I._...., NwIG Rl RI 3 j1R RIRI R RI �R1 RI UI _ CF-C SAX OR RIRI RIuRI RI Faoul Foa SHEN_YN R Z YANHATTAN pR RI_ 461/)TO Fi C_F_ • R I = R I RI RI u RI RI RI-CD W RI RI gwNRao o a+. = R CDRY DR. RI WCXARD DR RI-VY •RI-CD IPoI RI MI-CD �'< R I RI RI 3 RI m ylTe RI RI J. RI RI ,r — CMSTA RALW OR. R .. of N L0. gg C4-CD..; MI—CD f>s $Y RI 3 RI E RI RI I � 'mil✓ `'F. Y • CR. VIA ANGELIN• s DR. SUNDANLE LR (� • -Ij (PARq RI RI RI CIF-E RI —� t O✓', v OIL (MESA'VIE.SCH_�i.) O% D RA-CD. o� o RHEEL N RI R I-- RI J RI RI g f Q ¢sAREI a VIA c•Rox• OR Y - ---- 1 RI Q f 5 $ OR R I RI RI RI em'Esm. - RDIES DR RI V A CF-R �✓ I RI • � „VELA IAEVA OR RI RI = _ : �' EL CORTW dL RI I RI F RI RI IL p R RI 7 ARACEI4 DR C F—R Nes� D'Ei[ • w. RI ER RI ci:IHrr:?'.n; eNra !.;._H::I o MI-CD rj �M(6h4'� r RI R! e I �RI � RI ' I PROJECT SITE ;EMI-CD DR. CENTRAL RYM OR OR w N RI MI-CD • 7FP�, VRI: RI RI ; RI RIaeL) Ru sr C F-R .-EN HAL :..<t, CF—R MI—CD N • 'I—CD G e MI—CD a RA-0-CD = MI MI RA-0-CD 1` iEZONED) RA-0-CD - u • RI-CD CF-C M, I: W NOTE: :N rELI IJ ALL I-EN5HINS ARE IN FEET RA-0-CD RA-0-CD ANY ZONE ADJOINING ANY RIGHT DF WAY a vv v oe• E.D IS INTENDED TO EXTEND TO THE CENTER OF SUCH RIGHT OF MAY (PREZONED) RA-0-CD RA-0-CD LEGEND: Ai CU TVW.psrRrcr • R - [� CDI®cD wlrH OIL mDDXTION p —C p � CDII TINED WITH OR NROD ICT0N ® SINGLE FANILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT ® LIGHT INDU5TR IAL DISTRICT ® HIGHXAY CONNERCIAL DISTRICT IT"OIL PRO111-1 COMMINI YNFACILIITIESIRECREATIC-LIDISTWT LE SI W w00 95R.60 RA—CD ® CIVIC DISTRICT JLANNE RA-0 RA-0—CD TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT FIGURE • ZONING MAP No. En*to 14 • planning&environmental sciences .^ u7EC� wKvwr , 7 7 \. t - r i Ili /(- V uy � .......... PROJECT SITE�7 t r� r Dy i e f �_ t 1 • s i- --:.: >: .. ,:: .- �.dy.y rry may`• • e� -2. . r --_�(F��t���}� �91� �'`�ti��iar�Nf� ,�_I,',. �' a.{� Sh. Land Use Categories RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL PUBLIC USE Estate 5 2 un/gac ®General Public,Quasi-public, Institutional Estate 54 un/gac Office Professional M Open Space Low Density <7 un/gac ®Mixed Development PLANNING UNITS ®Medium Density <_15 un/gac INDUSTRIAL =Planning Reserve High Density >15 un/goc General E3 Planned Community OTHER USES Resource Production do • FIGURE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP NO. Erw1ita 15 planning&environmental sciences 2.04.2 Environmental Impact The proposed project will have only a minor effect upon local land use patterns. The site lies within the boundaries of Huntington Central Park and is consistent with the General Plan (see Figure 15) . Residential neighborhoods to the west interface with the park but appear to be distant enough to significantly reduce any adverse impacts from the pro- posed project. In addition to the interface with surrounding residential land uses, different uses within Huntington Central Park will interface with the project site. The type of existing uses surrounding the project site, such as a nature center, wildlife area, and open meadows, represent a passive nature of park development. The implementation of the proposed skateboard park would act as the initial phase for introducing more active land use facilities into the Central Park scheme. Currently, no master plan for the Central Park system exists to serve as a guide in directing the design and implementation of future park developments. The adoption of the Olympic Skateboard Park into the Central Park system would, therefore, have an effect upon the selection and design of future park development. The proposed project is expected to attract children from throughout the City. This will create a place for juveniles to congregate, creating potential problems due to loitering. It should be noted, however, that parks and recrea- tional activities are designed to attract juveniles. 36 In addition, there is potential for adverse interfaces between the proposed project and surrounding land uses. These include: (1) Glare from lighting. (2) In and out vehicle traffic. (3) Increased pedestrian circulation. (4) Overflow parking during special events. (5) Noise, both from and onto the project site. A detailed discussion of these various impacts is presented in their appropriate sections, along with specific mitigation measures. 2.04.3 Mitigation Measures The detailed design of the skateboard park facility should include mitiga- tion measures to reduce potential impacts upon the surrounding land uses. The project should be effectively screened from surrounding uses and designed to blend into the park environment. Special attention should be given to the design and placement of lights and the sound system. Other mitigation measures affecting land use compatibility are identified in other sections of this report, such as aesthetics and traffic. 37 2.05 Visual and Aesthetics 2.05. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site is currently vacant and serves no beneficial use within Huntington Central Park. Views onto the site from surrounding areas are shown in Figure 12. The project site is characterized by variable topography, generally sloping to the west. Existing vegetation consists of various weeds, grasses, and a few shrubs. Park uses surrounding the site include landscaped meadows, a wildlife area and nature center, a library and cultural center, and playground facilities. 2.05.2 Environmental Impact Implementation of the proposed skateboard facility will result in a change in the appearance of the project site. The project site is located in a prominent area of the park where the facility will be clearly visible for some distance from the surrounding areas. The potential for beneficial and adverse visual impacts exists with the proposed project. The project will include floodlighting for nighttime activities. The lighting will produce some glare that could adversely impact the surrounding land uses and could also create a safety hazard for vehicle traffic along Golden West Street and Talbert Avenue. The impact of lighting on the surrounding vicinity will be increased by the elevation of the site relative to areas to the west and southwest. The site is lower in elevation than Golden West but higher than adjacent areas to the west. 38 Light stands placed along Golden West and directed westward would be visible from park and residential areas to the west. Likewise, lighting from the western side of the site directed eastward could create adverse effects on motorists traveling along Golden West Street and Talbert Avenue. These lights might ex- tend high enough to be on an equal elevation with the streets and thus possess the ability to shine into the eyes of approaching motorists. Spectator viewing stands along Golden West Street create an undesirable vista from Golden West. Entry signs fronting the project site along Golden West Street might create a similar impact. It is common for activities of this nature to employ P.A. (public address) systems for the purpose of announcing special events and for playing music during normal operating hours. Noise generated from such a system may prove objectionable to the surrounding park users and residents further west. A landscaped buffer zone has been proposed to extend around the project site boundaries with additional landscaping within the park. This would impact positively upon the scenic vistas onto the site from the surrounding land uses and public roads. 2.05.3 Mitigation Measures A landscaped buffer around the perimeter of the project site will improve scenic vistas onto the site and might mitigate objectionable views resulting from spectator stands, parking facilities, and lighting stands. The degree of mitiga- tion will depend upon the type and density of vegetation used and the design of the facilities and fixtures. 39 • The project proponent proposes to use metal halide I ighting for the • skateboard facility. This type of lighting is long-burning, low-cost, and low- maintenance, and is compatible with existing lights. used within the Central Park system. To reduce the impact of glare upon the surrounding land uses, it is • proposed that all lighting fixtures be directed inward toward the park from the site boundaries, and that the height of the light stands will be only as tall as • necessary to create the desired illumination. Careful attention as to the location of the light stands within the project site could further mitigate the impact of glare upon surrounding areas. • Entry signs fronting the facility and the pro shop building will be designed in the same architectural style as Huck's Hangout. This will maintain architec- tural continuity with the already existing park structures. • • • • 40 • • 2.06 Safety • 2.06. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site is currently vacant, serving as open space within Huntington Central Park. In this existing condition, no significant factors • associated with safety were noted on the project site. 2.06.2 Environmental Impacts Factors related to safety for the proposed skateboard.park result from • both on-site activities and bicycle-pedestrian traffic traveling to and from the project site. • While controlled skateboard facilities are intended to reduce personal injuries incurred by the skaters, skateboarding is still a potentially hazardous recreational activity. • The majority of pedestrian and bicycle traffic will originate from nearby residential areas north of the project site. Movement of this traffic will be pri- marily along Golden West Street. In addition, bicycle traffic to the site from • surrounding schools is also expected to impact upon existing bikeways. For instance, Huntington High School is located approximately two miles south of • the project site and Ocean View High School approximately one mile to the north. Students from these two schools are expected to use Golden West Street. Currently, there are no existing bike trails along Golden West Street that lead • Up to the project site (see Figure 8) . Golden West Street has lane striping on both sides of the road which delineates the shoulder area. This area could be • 41 • • used by pedestrian-bicycle traffic if there are no vehicles parked in the area. • However, during major special events, parking will probably occur along both shoulders of the road. The Master Plan of Bikeways for Huntington Beach indicates a future bike • trail along Golden West Street, north of the project site. This proposed trail will terminate in the vicinity of Tom's Place. Another trail is proposed along Talberf Avenue east from the intersection with Golden West Street (see Figure 9) . • In addition, a trail is also indicated along Gothard Street. However, this trail is a phase three bikeway, and the scheduling of its construction is somewhat • uncertain. The first two bikeways mentioned above (Golden West and Talbert) are expected to be constructed within five years as part of the second phase of the • Master Plan of Bikeways. The bikeway proposed along Gothard is a phase three project and will not be constructed for at least five years. The existing bikeway system is viewed as being inadequate to handle the pedestrian-bicycle • traffic that would result from the proposed project. Implementation of the skateboard park might act to accelerate the installa- tion of these bikeways in order to accommodate the increased traffic that would result from the proposed project. 2.06.3 Mitigation Measures • Safety equipment will be required as part of the park rules that will govern the operation and activities of the skateboard park. This equipment • 42 • • will have to be worn by the skaters at all times and will include helmet, knee • and elbow pads, gloves, and shoes. The skill of the individual skaters, as evaluated by skate park attendants, will determine the course he or she may use. This will also act to reduce the potential for injuries. • A first aid area will be provided in the pro shop building. Here, basic first aid for minor injuries will be provided by skate park personnel. Hunting- ton Beach Fire Department Paramedics will be summoned to render assistance • for all but minor injuries sustained by participants and spectators. Construction of the proposed phase two bikeways along Golden West • Street and Talbert Avenue would provide safe routes for most pedestrian and bicycle traffic to within close proximity of the project site. Upon termination of the bikeway lane in the vicinity of Mel's Nursery, bikers could continue south • along a trail that exists within Central Park to the project site. Pedestrians and bikers leaving the site and traveling north would be required to cross Golden West Street at Talbert Avenue. To mitigate potential hazards due to • pedestrians crossing Golden West Street, the intersection should be..signalized. Currently, there are not any bikeways existing or proposed for Golden • West Street, south of the project site. Pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the south will eventually be handled by a phase three bikeway along Gothard Street. This trail will extend north and south of Talbert Avenue. Pedestrian and bike • traffic to and from the site could use Talbert Avenue to link up with the pro- • 43 • • posed trail along Gothard Street. The City may wish to move up the Gothard • Street trail from a phase three to a phase two project. • • • • • • • • 44 • 2.07 Public Services 2.07. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions Fire -- There is an existing fire station on Gothard Street, just north of Ellis Avenue, which provides protection for the area. The estimated emergency response time to the project site would be five minutes or less 90 percent of the time. Police -- The Huntington Beach Police Department is located in the 2100 block of Main Street in the City of Huntington Beach. This location is a distance of approximately two miles from the proposed skateboard park site. The estimated emergency response time to the park location would be within five minutes. The Police Department currently maintains regular patrols throughout this area. Sewer -- An existing sewer line is located within the park west of the project site. The sewer line serves the restroom facilities for this portion of Huntington Central Park. Public Transportation -- Orange County Transit District (OCTD) Bus Route 25 runs from north Orange County to the beach, along Golden West Street and Knott Avenue (Golden West becomes Knott Avenue north of the Garden Grove Freeway) . Along this route, the OCTD bus stops at the Huntington Library approximately once every 60 minutes. Bus Route 25 starts both north and south- bound service at 6: 00 a.m. Northbound service terminates at 9: 44 p.m. and southbound service at 10: 05 p.m. 45 2.07.2 Environmental Impacts Fire -- Injuries incurred by participants of the skateboard facility may require attention by the Paramedic squad of the Huntington Beach Fire Depart- ment. No major impacts to the Fire Department are anticipated resulting from the proposed project. . Police -- Impacts upon the operation of the Police Department resulting from the proposed project are as follows: (1) Parking (2) Security (3) Land use compatibility During special events, on-site parking will be inadequate to handle the expected 2,000 to 3,000 people that will visit the park. It is anticipated that an additional 405 off-site parking spaces will be needed during these special . events (see Traffic Section) . The Police Department reports a lack of off-the- highway parking in this area. Currently, Golden West Street is not curbed in the area of the park; and parking on the east side of Golden West Street is im- practical due to heavy traffic. Increased traffic during special events will also require additional police service for directing traffic. The Police Department reports that security is a major concern. The main focal point of this problem will be theft from the pro shop. 46 • Lighting of the facility, if not properly located, could be annoying to • residents around the park. Noise and crowds of young people that would be attracted to the location will also have an impact on the residents of the area. Sewer -- The existing sewer line, west of the project site, should be • adequate to handle the restroom facilities for the proposed project. Public Transportation -- In traversing north-south through Orange County, Bus Route 25 intersects 16 east-west routes. It is possible for the majority of persons living in Orange County to reach the skate park by bus with just one transfer. The potential for large bus patronage exists, and the age group which frequents skateboard parks are accustomed to bus riding. 2. 07.3 Mitigation Measures The proposed project design should provide adequate access to the site • and on-site circulation for Fire Department equipment and operations. Additional parking facilities in the surrounding area will act to mitigate • impacts on parking during special events resulting from the proposed project. A chain link fence will be constructed around the perimeter of the project site to partially mitigate the problem of security for the proposed project. • • • 47 • • 2.08 Economics r 2. 08. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions Huntington Central Park is owned by the City of Huntington Beach. Commercial and certain recreational facilities within the park are leased to the • Huntington Central Park Concession Company, which is responsible for develop- ing and operating recreational and restaurant facilities in the park., The exist- 0 ing lease agreement states that rent on the park will be a percentage of gross receipts of the concession company, with the City being guaranteed a minimum of $10,000 a year. Since the lease began in December of 1972, the concession company has successfully implemented two projects, known as Tom's Place and Huck's Hangout. These projects generate low levels of gross receipts resulting in the City receiving only the guaranteed minimum of $10,000 annually. The existing minimal development of Central Park also results in very modest revenues in the form of sales tax and property tax. City expenditures on the park site in its entirety, and the project site in particular, are minimal. It appears that the only major expenses by the City are police patrol of the park and planning and administrative staff time spent reviewing development proposals and other contractual arrangements. 2.08.2 Environmental Impact The City will receive project-generated revenues from a variety of sources, including rent from the skateboard park, rent from the Huntington Central Park Concession Company, and increased property tax revenue and sales tax revenue. 48 • The major source of revenue will be rent to the City from the skateboard park operators. The operators will pay 5 percent of all gross receipts less than $200,000, 6 percent of all gross receipts between $200,000 and $400,000, and 9 percent of gross receipts in excess of $400,000. There is no guaranteed mini- mum rent in the agreement between the City and Universal Skate Parks, Inc. Estimated receipts for the skateboard park were placed at $780,000 during con- tract negotiations between the City and Universal Skate Parks, Inc. Based on that figure, the City would receive $56,200 annually in rent. If the estimated receipts figure is halved, rent decreases by 62 percent to $21 ,400. Huntington Central Park Concession Company will also receive a percen- tage of Universal Skate Parks, Inc. 's gross receipts as rent. Huntington Central Park Concession Company will receive 10 percent of the first $400,000 and 11 per- cent of all receipts in excess of $400,000. The estimated gross receipts of $780,000 annually would yield $81 ,800 for the concession company. It is assumed that this money would be considered as part of the concession company's gross receipts, which means the City would receive 5 percent of these receipts, or $4,090. However, it should be noted again that the concession company's gross receipts are presently very small, and the firm pays its existing $10,000 rent as an annual minimum, rather than as a percentage of receipts. In other words, the $4,090 accruing to the City from the Huntington Central Park Concession Company would probably be part of the existing $10,000 minimum rent rather than being in addition to that $10,000. 49 M • The skateboard park could attract enough people into Central Park to • make other concessions, such as a fast food outlet, profitable. Such concessions might be run by Huntington Central Park Concession Company and would add substantially to the company's gross receipts. The City would get a percentage • of the new receipts. The City will also receive sales tax revenue from the skateboard park and induced service facilities. The City's share of total sales tax is 1 percent • of gross sales. The projected $780,000 in gross receipts could generate up to $7,800 in sales tax revenue to the City. • The skateboard park will entail construction of skateboard runs and a small office building/rental center. The cost of constructing these improvements was estimated to be $650,000 by the skateboard park developer. Assuming that • the assessed value of the improvements is equal to one-quarter of the construc- tion cost of the improvements, the skateboard park will generate approximately • $2,500 for the City, based on the existing rate of $1 .55 per $100 assessed value that the City receives from the County. Total revenues to the City from the skateboard park are estimated to be • approximately $66,500, based on gross receipts of $780,000, an assessed value of.$162,500, and the assumption that no new revenue will accrue from the Huntington Central Park Concession Company due to the existing low level of gross receipts of that company. If the assumed gross receipts is reduced by half to $390,000, the City will receive a total of approximately $27,800. • 50 • • The City will incur very limited expenses if it approves the proposed project. The City's planning and administrative staff would probably spend approximately the same amount of total time on Central Park and the project site as is currently spent. The Police Department might have to increase the • time spent patrolling the park area, but this increase could be accomplished by altering patrol procedures, and would not necessitate hiring of new staff. The major capital expenditure by the City would be construction of curbs, • gutters, and street widening along Golden West Street for a distance of approxi- mately 850 feet. These improvements would cost-about $50,000. Signalization • of the intersection of Golden West Street and Talbert Avenue could cost another $50,000, bringing total capital expenditures to $100,000. The City could pay off its capital expenses by using project-generated • revenues in two to four years, depending on the gross receipts of the proposed project. • 2.08.3 Mitigation Measures Project-generated revenues would be sufficient to pay off anticipated capital expenses in approximately two to four years. • • r 51 • 2.09 Energy 2.09.1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site does not currently consume any appreciable amount of energy. The site does not consume any natural gas or electricity. The unde- veloped condition of the site results in little automobile traffic to and from the site. 2.09.2 Environmental Impact The major sources of energy consumption will be automobile traffic to and from the site and consumption of electricity by outdoor lighting and other on-site machinery. Gasoline consumption is determined by calculating total project VMT (vehicle miles traveled) and dividing by the number of miles per gallon of gasoline. The number of trips per day to and from the skateboard facility developed by Weston Pringle and Associates (see traffic report in Appendix) was used in calculating total VMT. Trip length information was based on the market potential for the skateboard facility and information from LARTS, the Los Angeles Regional Transportation Study. It was assumed that the average trip length to the skateboard park by skater would be 5.0 miles, while average trip length by spectators will be 5. 8 miles. Based on these assumptions, the facility will generate approximately 1.24 million VMT annually. By way of comparison, this is approximately the amount of VMT generated by 50 single- family homes. Based on the standard assumption of 13.7 miles per gallon, the completed project will consume approximately 90,600 gallons of gasoline. 52 The other major source of energy consumption will be the use of high- wattage lights to illuminate the facility for night use. Based on an analysis of a smaller skateboard park in Anaheim, it was estimated that the proposed pro- ject will require seven 1,000-watt lights per acre of recreational area and 12 400-watt lights per acre of parking. Although specific times of operation for the skateboard facility have not been determined, it was assumed that the lights would be on three hours per night for the entire year. This would generate 8,700 KWH (kilowatt hours) annually. By way of comparison, this is approxi- mately the amount of electricity consumed annually by six medium-sized (1,500- sq. ft.) all electric, single-family homes. Other significantly smaller amounts of energy will be consumed by land- scape maintenance, lighting and heating the rental office, and the use of mopeds to travel to and from the skateboard facility. Construction of the proposed pro- ject will consume energy on a short-term basis. 2.09.3 Mitigation Measures Use of metal-halide or other efficient lights will produce the maximum amount of light with the smallest consumption of energy. The proposed project's location adjacent to bus routes and residential areas will minimize auto travel and increase the use of energy-efficient modes of transportation, such as walking, bicycles, mopeds, and buses. 53 • 2. 10 Noise 2. 10. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions Since the project site is vacant, there is currently no noise generated. Noise levels experienced at the project site result primarily from vehicular • traffic on Golden West Street. The ambient noise levels currently experienced at locations in proximity to the project site and nearby residences have been measured (see Noise Study, • Appendix E) . The noise study indicates that existing ambient noise levels range from 47 to 62 dB(A) , depending on the time of day. This noise is pro- duced by the various park activities, local traffic, and light aircraft. 2. 10.2 Environmental Impacts The main sources of noise produced from the proposed project onto sur- rounding areas will be from crowds and sound amplification equipment. Noise measurements obtained from other existing skateboard parks and previous information on crowd-generated noise indicates that noise produced by spectators would impact upon local residents west of the project site. The project site is approximately 700 feet from the nearest residential locations along Cliffview Lane. Assuming crowd noise is projected eastward away from the nearest homes, expected noise levels for crowd size range from 77 dB (A) for 500 people to 83 dB(A) for 2;000 people. Sound amplification equipment used to communicate with both spectators and participants within the park could be annoying to nearby residents. In order 54 • • to be effective, the sound level of the amplified sound at the spectator locations • should be about 70 to 75 dB (A) . When experienced at the residential locations, the amplified sound levels may be as high as 47 to 52 dB(A) . When experienced at the residential. locations, sound from the various com- munication systems should not exceed the ambient sound level. Crowd noise may be above the level of the ambient background noise, when experienced at the homes; but to minimize annoyance, they should not exceed the background noise • by more than 3 to 5 decibels. 2. 10.3 Mitigation Measures Mitigation measures to limit crowd noise levels, at the nearest homes, to no more than 55 dB (A) during daytime hours are as follows: (1) Lower the elevation of the various skating areas • which are nearest to the homes to the west of the site. (2) Provide a noise barrier along the westerly bound- ary of the site. The barrier may be an earth berm and/or a concrete block, concrete slab, or metal wall. (3) Locate the noise-producing events involving both participants and spectators at the positions of the site nearest to Golden West Street. (4) The viewing stands nearest to the homes to the west, should be provided with walls on the north, west, 55 and south side of the stand and a canopy over a por- tion of the stand. The stands should only face with spectator orientation to the east. (5) Acoustic baffles in the form of wing walls may be required on each side of the viewing stands nearest to the homes to the west. The sound amplification systems used to communicate with spectators • and participants should include design features to minimize sound propagation to the west. These design features should include baffles and horns designed to confine the sound to specific areas or project it to the east away from the homes. 55-a SECTION 3.0 TOPICAL ISSUES 3.01 'Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are some environmental impacts which cannot be totally eliminated through mitigation measures: • (1) There will be a loss of approximately 12 acres of open space. (2) Traffic and circulation on surrounding streets and bikeways will increase as the result of building the skateboard park. (3) Air pollutants and noise will be generated by • construction equipment, and dust will be generated during grading. After project completion, some air pollutants will be gener- ated by vehicles traveling to and from the site. (4) There will be an increase in storm water runoff due to the construction of impermeable surfaces. (5) Energy consumption in the area will increase. (6) The demand for public services and utilities will increase. 56 3.02 Growth-Inducing Impact The successful development of the project site could encourage the development of other vacant parcels in Huntington Central Park and surround- ing areas. There is also the possibility that a skateboard park could attract additional youth-oriented activities. The successful development of the proposed project could encourage other active recreational activities within Huntington Central Park. This additional growth, though not directly attributable to the proposed project, will result in a consequential increase in traffic and noise in the area. Development of the proposed project will also act to induce the implemen- tation of future bike trails as outlined in the Master Plan of Bikeways for Huntington Beach. 3.03 Alternatives 3.03. 1 No Project The "no project" alternative would leave the project site in its currently vacant condition. The site might remain vacant, until such time when a master r plan for future development of Huntington Central Park is approved. Several master plans, in the past, have been proposed. However, none have ever been approved by the Huntington Beach City Council. ~ The Department of Recreation, Parks, and Human Services is currently conducting a survey. They are asking for input from residents of the City for 57 r r the purpose of guiding future development or recreational activities within Huntington Central Park. Therefore, the "no project" alternative might serve as a temporary delay in the development of the site until a master plan could be approved. '3.'03.2 Design Alternative The proposed design alternative, as shown in Figure 16, was previously reviewed by the Huntington Beach Planning Department. Since then, the design has been revised and reflects the current proposed project. Principal design changes include the type of parking facilities proposed and alteration of traffic circulation around Huntington Central Park (see Figure 16) . The design alternative proposes strip parking along access roads within Huntington Central Park. This would have an effect to spread out parking along the boundaries of the project site. As a result of this alternative parking design, spectators and participants would be required to walk further in order to enter the skateboard park. In addition, vehicle traffic within Huntington Central Park might create adverse impacts upon surrounding park uses. The proposed design alternative would create increased access to the project site at the expense of increased levels of vehicle and bicycle-pedestrian traffic within Huntington Central Park. 3.03.3 Alternate Locations ' As an alternative to the proposed site location, the skateboard park could be located opposite the Huntington Library on Talbert Avenue. 58 Its V SPECTATOR BEATING _ice ACCESS RO_P%f i RECOVERY ay O fx!S FREESTYLE I � RISTROor COMPETITION 4 i✓ Q - u 1 D°Q BEGINNING SKATEBOARD W D s =x8 ��-..•. - .r 1 0 0 QJY. ID PARKING � j INTERMEDIATE �� d a Z. SKATEBOARD L 0 41- -j} 6IsT i' 7 .I i 0 ADVANCED • a r, TENNIS COURT Q67 SKATEBOARD p \ f, 046. SEATING �i �%':+i�,%/-it✓����iu-��ii�.T.:�•:s—IV 7j Q �� f r:! .•.�`- � �L DESIGN ALTERNATIVE z"O11 m • planning&environmental sciences This site location is currently vacant open space within Huntington Central Park. In the past, the site has been used as a dump site. Construction of the A proposed skateboard park at this location would require additional expense for grading and compacting due to its past land use. This alternative site location does, however, represent a less prominent area within the park. In addition, the site is further removed from residential neighborhoods. The adoption of this alternative location could lessen impacts associated with light and glare, and land use compatibility. a M . 60 S SECTION 4.0 REFERENCES 4. 01 Bibliography "Geotechnical Inputs," Huntington Beach Planning Department, February, 1974. "Huntington Beach General Plan," Huntington Beach Planning Department, December, 1976. "Trails Implementation Plan," Huntington Beach Planning Department, December, 1977. "Flood Hazard Study," Huntington Beach Planning Department, April, 1974. "Environmental Impact Report for Central Park and Central Library, Huntington Beach, California," E.D.A.W. , April, 1973. "Huntington Central Park Master Concession Lease," December 4, 1972. 4.02 Persons and Organizations Consulted Huntington Beach Fire Department Captain Mel Ott Deputy Fire Marshal Public Works, City of Huntington Beach Recreation, Parks, and Human Services iNorm Worthy - Director City Administration, City of Huntington Beach Darrel Cohoon - Assistant City Administrator • Planning Department, City of Huntington Beach • Jim Barnes - Assistant Planner 61 • • • • planning& environmental sciences C X• Wig, , P A W e6W ?Vqfs ad Aaaedala TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING January 16, 1978 Mr. Richard Schmid Envi s to 1745 Orangewood Avenue, Suite 210 Orange, California 92668 Dear Mr. Schmid: We have prepared a traffic impact analysis for the proposed Olympic Skateboard Park by Universal Skate Parks Incorporated in. the City of Huntington Beach. The traffic impact analysis will contain the following sections: 1. Findings - Traffic Impacts - Mitigation Measures 2. Project Description - Location - Proposed Development 3. Existing Traffic Conditions - Surrounding Street System - Existing Traffic Volumes 4. 11rojc-cc 'Traffic - rraffic Cenciration and Modal Split - Traffic Distribution - Project Traffic Volumes 5. I�ut.ure 'Traffic Conditions - Existing PIlls 1'r0ject.. Traff:i.c - 'traffic Signal Warrants - Incersuction Capacity A-1 2651 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE • SUITE 110 • FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA 92631 • (714) 871-2931 • -2- • 6. On-Site Traffic Considerations - Internal Circulation - Parking Layout - Parking Spaces 7. Other Traffic Considerations - Pedestrians and Bicycles - Public Transit Service - Skateboard Safety • 1. Findings This traffic analysis has determined the traffic impacts and has led to recommen- dation of the mitigation measures. • Traffic Impacts. The following traffic impacts will result from the proposed development: • A. This report estimates that approximately 170 vehicles per day will be attracted to this skateboard park during a typical winter, mid-week day; approxi- mately 1080 trips per day on typical summer, mid-week day; approximately 1350 trips per day on typical weekend day; and approximately 3600 trips per day for the • special events to be held quarter annually (See Section 4, Table 2 for additional information) . B. It is estimated that the predominant orientation of vehicle traffic as • well as pedestrian and bicycle traffic will be to or from the north on Golden West (See Section 4, Figure 2 for additional information). c'. A traffic vi};nal wi I I lie warranted dues to vc•hlcle volumes at the inter-section of Talbert and Golden West alter congpletion of this project (See Section 5 and Mitigation Measure F for additional information). D. The intersection capacity of Talbert and Golden West with a signal will • not be exceeded during the typical weekend operation. For special events, the capacity will be exceeded and a policeman will be required to direct traffic (See Section 5 for additional information) . A-2 • • -3- • E. The on-site internal circulation has been found satisfactory once miti- gation measures A to E are implemented (See Section 6 for additional information). • F. The parking and parking layout were found adequate, except for the quarter annual special events when approximately. 2.5 to 3 acres of additional off-site park- ing will be required (See Section 6 for additional information). • G. For bicycle parking, the proposed 150 bike racks will be enough to accommo- date all bicycle and moped parking except that which occurs during the quarter annual special events. At that time the demand will be for up to 420 bike racks (See Sec- tion 7 for additional information). • H. Excellent public transit exists to the site and it is estimated bus usage will be quite significant. • I. From a highway safety point of view, the skateboard park will provide an off-road, off-sidewalk supervised place for skateboarding. Elimination of skate- boards from streets and sidewalks will significantly improve highway safety. • Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures are recommended: A. The entrance/exit roadway should be located directly opposite of Talbert. B. The possibility of relocating Talbert southward (as previously planned but not now currently planned) should be anticipated. This possible relocation of Talbert would cause a relocation of the site driveway, and it may be desirable Lo combine Elie sluieeboard park and adjacent mirk entrance driveways. • C. The entrance driveway should be at least 24 feet wide, but should not be more than 36 feet wide. A driveway wider than 36 feet will encourage parking along the entrance/exit driveway. - A-3 • • -4- • D. Adjacent the entrance/exit driveway, provisions should be made for bi- cycle and pedestrian ingress and egress. • E. The entrance/exit driveway should be a "curb-return" type as opposed to a "dust-pan" type. F. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Talbert and Golden • West (See Section 5 for additional information). • 2. Project Description The project location and proposed development are discussed below. Location. The project will be located in the City of Huntington Beach in • Central Park at the intersection of Talbert and Golden West. Golden West runs north-south and Talbert tees into Golden West from the east. The project will be located on the west side of Golden West and essentially directly opposite of Talbert. The project driveway will be the fourth lag of the existing tee • intersection. Proposed Development. The development will be an approximately 12 acre skateboard park which will have 85 marked parking spaces and an additional 110 reservoir parking spaces on adjacent grass area. Additional off-site parking spaces will exist as discussed in Section 6 of this report. The skateboard park will have spectator arenas with a total of 2,000 seats. Skateboard parks are run on a "session" basis. A participant pays an admission charge and is allowed • to skate I-or a specified time period. Typically, the session begins whenever the entrant wishes to enter the park. The developer estimates that between 350 and 500 persons are the maximum number which will be at the park at any one time ex- cepting the special events. This 350 to 500 attendees is consistent with data • collected at other skateboard parks (all were 5 acres or less) where as many as 300 attendees have• been observed. Special events will be held on a quarter yearly A-4 • • -5- • basis, and the author estimates these events will be attended by as many as 3,000 persons including spectators, participants, participants' associates, employees, • news media, and so forth. 3. Existing Traffic Conditions • The traffic conditions as they exist today are discussed below. Surrounding Street System. The site has excellent regional access. Golden West connects to the north to the San Diego Freeway and to the south to Pacific • Coast Highway. Talbert connects to the east to Beach Boulevard and beyond. Golden West is a four lane highway, Talbert is a two lane roadway, and neither roadway is constructed to ultimate cross section nor are there plans to do so. Their intersection is controlled by a three-way stop with flashing warning beacons • facing each traffic approach direction. Existing Traffic Volumes. To determine existing traffic volumes, a manual traffic count was'made by the consultant at the intersection of Golden West and • Talbert. Because the City did not have counts in the vicinity less than two years old, the manual traffic counts were expanded to determine estimated daily volumes. The traffic volumes are shown in Figure 1. • 4. Pro'ect Traffic Because there is a scarcity of data concerning traffic generation of skateboard parks, it was necessary to make several assumptions concerning attendance, mode of travel., number of persons per vehicle, and times of arrival. These estimates • are made on the bases indicated below, and are the best estimates available. t%`here information was not available and assumptions are made, the assumptions are made so that vehicle traffic has been estimated higher than will probably actually occur. A-5 • • Figure 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES (Summer Volumes Are Estimated to be 30 Percent Higher) Ipia %D N I < M O to I ' Talbert I ca AM I wl 3 PM Hf r+l C/3I v 7 .-a r Ln Ln a ^ Ln I o OC Ln o Ln I TI-al f-ic Count Ly Nadu v r i clay, January 13, 1978 A-6 -6- • Traffic Generation and Modal Split. To determine traffic generation, the following approach has been used. Traffic data was collected on other skate parks. Data was collected on number of persons arriving at the park by: auto-park, auto-drop off, bicycle, walk and public transit, and for the auto-park and auto- drop off modes the average number of occupants per vehicle were observed. These data were used as a guide for determining modal split and. persons attracted to the proposed site. It should be fully recognized that the modal split will be highly dependent upon the concentration of dwellings within a reasonable walking and bicycling distance to the site, and the availability of transit ser- vice to the site. Another consideration in estimating traffic volumes is day of the week. In the summertime heavy usage will occur on Saturday and Sunday, and fairly heavy usage Monday through Friday. When school is in session, heavy usage will occur on Saturday and Sunday and a much reduced usage on weekdays. The first skateboard park for which the author collected data is located in the City of Carson on Main Street just north of the San Diego Freeway. This park is a little over four acres and lies in an area remote from residential areas. Con- sequently, the number of persons walking and riding a bike to the site were lower than might otherwise be expected, and those coming by auto were higher than might otherwise be expected. • The second skateboard park examined was in Fountain Valley near the intersection of Warner and Magnolia. This course is located near large concentrations of residential development. The number of walkers and bike riders were much higher. • Table 1 shows a summary of data collected at the two skateboard parks and shows the Recommended Design Parameters. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation from the proposed development, and an estimate of parking demand. A-7 Table 1 TRIP AND PARKING DATA Parameter Carson Fountain Recommended Park Valley Design Park Parameter Person Trips Walk (includes bus trips) 3% 15%. 15% Bicycle 3 7 7 Moped 3 14 14 Car Which Parks 58 57 57 Car Which Drops Off Passengers 33 6 6 (Total Car Trips) (91) (63) (63) Total 100% 100% 100'/ Vehicle Trips Mopeds 6% 17% 17% Car Which Parks 58 66 66 Car Which Drops Off Passengers 36 17 17 (Total Car Trips) (94) (83) (83) Total 100% 100% 100% Vehicle Trips per Attendee ' Moped .02 .10 .10 Car Which Parks .23 .29 .29 Car Which Drops Off Passengers .14 .06 .06 (Total Car Trips per Attendee) (.37) (.35) (.35) Total .39 .45 .45 Vehicle Occupancy Persons per Moped 1.5 1.5 1.5 Persons per Car Which Parks 2.8 2.9 2.8 Persons Dropped Off per Car 2.1 2.1 2.1 Which Drops Off Passengers • Vehicle Parking per Attendee' Bicycles .015 .08 .08 Mopeds .015 .06 .06 Cars .19 . 18 '.20 Total .22 .32 .34 Attendee is all persons at skate park including skaters, spectators, employees, and so forL11. A-8 Table 2 TRAFFIC GENERATION AND PARKING DEMAND Factor Design Winter Summer Weekend Special Provided Value Weekday Weekday Event in Proposed Design Estimated Attendees at one time 100 400 500 3,000 D Estimated Attendees per day 300 1,200 1,500 4,000 Vehicle Trip Ends per Hour Mopeds .10 10 40 50 300 Cars .35 35 140 165 1,050 Total .45 45 180 215 1,350 Vehicle Trip Ends per Day :fopeds .20 60 240 300 800 Cars .70 210 840 1,050 2,800 Total .90 170 1,080 1,350 3,600 Vehicle Parking Bicycles .08 10 35 40 240 T 150 Mopeds .06 10 25 30 180 J Cars .20 20 80 100 600 195 -7- Traffic.Distribution. The geographical directional distribution of traffic will depend on mode. Pedestrian/bicycle trips will be from nearby residences; auto trips will be from residences up to several miles away; and bus trips will be aligned along the bus routes. Figure 2 shows the estimated directional dis- tribution of traffic for the proposed site. The directional distribution will be assumed to apply to weekday as well as weekend traffic, and for typical oper- ations as well as special events. Proiect Traffic Volumes. In Table 2, peak hour and daily traffic volumes were generated for weekdays, weekends, and special events. Because weekends are higher traffic generation periods than weekdays, and because special events are the highest traffic generators, street traffic volumes generated by the pro- ject on weekends and for special events have been determined and are shown in Table 3. The traffic volumes on each street segment were determined by utilizing the traffic distribution shown in Figure 2 and the traffic generation volumes in Table 2. To the project volumes, the existing summertime volumes are added. The summertime volumes were assumed to be 30 percent higher than those volumes counted at 5 PM on a Friday in January, 1978. 5, Future Traffic Conditions The existing plus project traffic volumes at the intersection of Talbert and Golden West, and whether the intersection will warrant signalization are dis- cussed below. Existing Plus Proiect Traffic. Table 3 shows the existing, project, and existing plus project traffic volumes. Traffic Signal Warrants. The intersection of Talbert and Golden West will have sufficient weekend vehicle volumes to warrant a traffic signal, and for special events the volumes far exceed those required to warrant traffic signals. Traffic signal warrants have been adopted by the Federal Highway Administration and CalTrans. These warrants are based upon the eighth highest hour volumes in A-10 Figure 2 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 'A 60% Auto 75% Pedestrian 75% Bike 70% Bus I 20% Auto 5% Pedestrian 5% Bike 07 Bu s S I T E I Talbert M. Auto 15% Pedestrian I 15% Bike 0% Bus 20% Auto 5% Pedestrian 5% Bike 3 30% Bus n v 0 c� Note: Sum of Each Mode is 100 Percent. A-11 Table 3 Peak Hour Intersection Volume Golden West and Talbert Volumes Movement Existing Project Existing + Project Summer Weekend Special Weekend Special Event Event Vehicle Volume (Cars + Mopeds Northbound Through 845 845 845 Northbound Right 70 70 70 Northbound Left 0 20 140 20 140 Southbound Through 860 860 860 Southbound Right 0 70 410 70 410 Southbound Left 290 290 290 Eastbound Through 0 20 140 20 140 Eastbound Right 0 20 140 20 140 Eastbound Left 0 70 410 70 410 Westbound Through 0 20 140 20 140 Westbound Right 125 125 125 Westbound Left 70 70 70 Pedestrians and Bicycles Across Golden West 0 60 360 60 360 A-12 • a day. It is generally assumed that the eighth highest hour is 60 percent of the peak hour and the peak hour is 10 percent of the daily traffic. Thus the signal warrants can be also expressed in terms of peak hour and daily traffic volumes. Table 4 shows the signal warrants. Examination of Table 4 and the expected future volumes at the intersection as contained in Table 3, shows that a signal is warranted for both typical weekend as well as special event expected vehicle volumes. • Traffic signals can also be warranted on the basis of pedestrian volumes. A pedestrian volume of 105 per hour for 8 hours or more each day is required. The pedestrian volumes generated by the project will not warrant traffic signals. • Intersection Capacity. The capacity of an intersection controlled by a sig- nal is far greater than the volumes required to warrant the traffic signal. Because a signal is just warranted for typical weekend operation, the capacity • of the intersection during these time periods will be far greater than the volumes. For special events, an Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) cal- culation has been made. The explanation of ICU and the calculation itself are contained in the Appendix. The calculation shows that the intersection will • operate at 111 percent of capacity during special events. Because capacity will be exceeded, it will be necessary for a policeman to manually direct traf- fic for the special events. • 6. On-Site Traffic Considerations This section discusses the internal design of the site from a traffic engineering • viewpoint. Internal Circulation. The internal circulation was reviewed and found satis- factory after incorporation of the following recommendations in the design: • a. The entrance/exit roadway should be located directly opposite of Talbert. A-13 • Table 4 SIGNAL WARRANTS Warrant Minimum Urban Traffic Volumes Entering Intersection `iajor Street (Both Approaches) Minor Street (Highest Approach) 1 Lane 2+ Lanes 1 Lane 2+ Lanes Daily Eighth Peak Daily Eighth Peak Daily Eighth Peak Daily Eighth Peak Highest Hour Highest Hour Highest Hour Highest Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour i D I Minimum 8,000 500 830 9,600 - 600 19000 2,400 150 250 3,200 200 330 Vehicular i Volume i Interruption 12,000 I ' 750 1,250 14,400 900 1,500 1,200 75 130 1,600 100 170 of Continuous Traffic • -9- • b. The possibility of relocating Talbert southward (as previously planned but not now currently planned) should be anticipated. This possible relocation of Talbert would cause a relocation of the site driveway, and it may be desirable • to combine the skateboard and adjacent park entrance driveways. The final skare - board park design should be sufficiently flexible Lo accommodate relocation of Talbert to the south, should it ever occur. • c. The entrance driveway should be at least 24 feet wide, but should not be more than 36 feet wide. A driveway wider than 36 feet will encourage parking along the entrance/exit driveway. A 36 foot driveway could accommodate two in- bound and one . outbound or one inbound and two outbound lanes for special events., d. Adjacent the entrance exit driveway, provisions should be made for bi- cycles and pedestrian ingress and egress. e. The entrance/exit driveway should be a 'curb-return" type as opposed • to a "dust-pan" type. Other aspects of the internal circulation which were examined and found satisfactory are the entrance driveway which provides excellent queue storage for entering and exiting vehicles, and the internal parking circulation. Parking Layout. The proposed parking layout, including parking space width (10 feet) and parking stall depth plus aisle width (65 feet from front of one • space to front of opposite space including aisle between) were found satisfactory. Parking Spaces. The proposed design has 195 spaces on-site which is ade- quate for normal weekend demand which will require approximately 100 spaces • (see Table 2). During Special Events up to 600 spaces will be required (see Table 2). Thus there is a' deficit of approximately 405 parking spaces. This deficit can be accommodated by using other available parking in the Central Park area. To determine existing surplus parking spaces in the area, parking • lots and on-street parking were examined between 3:00 and 3:30 PM on a warm sunny Saturday afternoon in January, 1978. This is the time of peak use for A-15 • • -10- • parks and libaries, and the results of this survey are presented in Table 5. Only 308 of the existing 532 parking lot spaces were empty. The remainder of • the 405 deficit spaces for the skateboard park will have to park on-street along Golden West between Talbert and Slater Avenue. There is a total of 4000 linear feet of curbing along both sides of the street, and unmarked park- ing spaces average about 30 feet per car. This yields 133 spaces, which when • added to the other 308. surplus spaces gives a total of 441 spaces to serve the expected 405 overflow cars from the skateboard park. It should be noted that the parking problem can be improved by having all major • skateboard Special Events on Sunday when the .Central Library is closed. The 165 cars observed at the library on Saturday afternoon would not be present on Sunday, and those cars which would otherwise have to park along Golden West could use the library parking area. • 7. Other Traffib Considerations In this section pedestrian and bicycle traffic, and public transit service will be discussed. • Pedestrians and Bicycles. Pedestrian and bicycle traffic generation has been previously discussed in Section 4. In this section other aspects of pedes- trian and bicycle traffic will be discussed. • Although Golden West has lane edge. line striping.on both sides of the road which delineates the shoulder area, this area is not a bicycle or pedestrian path. It can be used by pedestrians and bicycles when vehicles do not choose to park • in the area. It is anticipated that this delineated shoulder area will be avail- able to pedestrians and bicycles except during the quarter annually special events. During these events on-street parking will occur and any person coming to the center on foot or bicycle will be forced to walk or ride between the parked cars • and the adjacent through lane. A-!6 Tab le 5 CENTRAL PARK AUXILIARY PARKING Parking Area Spaces Occupied* Surplus Library Main Lot 162 146 16 • Auxiliary Lot 91 19 72 253 165 88 Matney Mesa Lot 50 28 22 Gothard Avenue Lot 53 11 42 • Slater Avenue Lot 80 3 77 Hucks Hangout Lots 96 17 79 (2 Lots) _ Subtotal 532 224 308 • On-Street, Golden West 133 0 133 Total 665 224 441 • * Saturday, 3 to 3:30 PM (clear, sunny) A-17 -ll.- For bicycle parking, 150 bike racks will be provided. It is expected as shown in Table 2 that these spaces will accommodate all bicycles and mopeds coming to the park except during special events when there will be 1 demand for approximately 420 bicycle spaces. The excess bikes and mopeds will be left either unguarded or else locked to trees, poles, fence posts, or the chain link Felice Public Transit Service. The proposed skateboard park has excellent transit service. Orange County Transit District Bus Route 25 runs from north Orange County to the beach on Golden West and Knott (Golden West becomes Knott north of the Garden Grove Freeway). In traversing north-south through Orange County, Bus Route 25 intersects 16 east-west bus routes. It is possible for the majority of persons living in Orange County to reach the skate park by bus with just one transfer. The potential for large bus patronage exists, and the age group which frequents skateboard parks are accustomed to bus riding. In Table l it was assumed that only 15 percent of the attendees would either walk or ride a bus to reach the skateboard park. This estimate is probably very low. The number of attendees which arrive by auto were overestimated, while the number of attendees riding the bus were underestimated because auto traffic will have a greater traf- fic impact. In reality though, probably as many as 25 percent may arrive by bus once the park is open for business several months and skaters learn the bus con- nections. It is impossible to accurately estimated the amount of bus ridership because availability of transit service is unique to each skateboard park. With this park being large and having regional draw power, it may be common for a 12 to 15 year old living. in Fullerton or Orange to catch the bus to the skate- board park. Skateboard Safety. On-street and on-sidewalk skateboard riding have proven to be extremely dangerous activities. It is claimed by some that the single sport injuring the most people in the United States today is skateboarding. Presumably, by providing a controlled skateboarding area where safety equipment is required, auto-skateboard accidents and probably all skateboard accidents, will be reduced. Although it is impossible to quantify lives and injuries which will be saved by opening this skateboard park, removing the skateboarders from the street: will have a positive impact. A-18 • -12- • It has been a pleasure preparing this traffic impact analysis for you. If there • are any questions, of if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate . to call us. Respectfully submitted, • 14ESTON PRINGLE AND ASSOCIATES Weston S. Pringle, P.E. • WSP:WK:ww #7700 • • • • • A-19 • A P P E N D I X INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Talbert & Golden West Special Events Volumes Movement Lanes Capacity(C) Volume(V) V/C Ratio Northbound Through 1 1600 845 0.57* Northbound Right 0 70 Northbound Left 1 1600 140** 0.02 Southbound: Through 1 1600 800 0.54 Southbound Right 1 1600 410 0.26 • Southbound Left 1 1600 290** 0.11* Eastbound 'Through I 1600 140 0.43* Eastbound Eight 0 140 Eastbound Left 0 410 Mestbound Through 1 1600 140 0.21 Westbound Right 0 125 Westbound Left 0 70 Intersection Capacity Utilization 1.11 Critical movements included in sum for ICU Note, 120 left turn vehicles per hour, or 2 vehicles per cycle clear on yellow time. A-20 E_xnlanation of Intersection Capacity Utilization The capacity of a street is nearly always greater between intersections, and less at intersections. The reason for this is that the traffic flows continu- ously between intersections and only part of the time at intersections. To study intersection capacity, a technique known as Intersection Capacity Utiliza- tion (ICU) has been developed. ICU analysis consists of (a) determining the proportion of signal time needed to serve each conflicting movement, (b) summing the times for the movements, and (c) comparing the total time required to the time available. For example, if for north-south traffic the northbound traffic is 1,000 vehicles per hour, the southbound traffic is 800 vehicles per hour, and the capacity of either approach is 2,000 vehicles per hour of green, then the north- bound traffic is critical and requires 1,000/2,000 or 50 percent of the signal time. If for the east-west traffic, 40 percent of the signal time is required, then it can be seen that the ICU is 50 plus 40, or 90 percent. When left-turn phases exist, they are incorporated into the analysis. As ICU's approach 100 percent, the quality of traffic service approaches Level of Service E, as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 87, Highway Research Board, 1965. Level of Service is used to describe quality of traffic flow. Levels of Service A to C operate quite well. Level of Service D is typically the Level of Service for which an urban street is designed. Level of Service E is the maximum volume a facility can accommodate and will result in possible stoppages of momentary duration. Level of Service F occurs when a facility is overloaded and is char- acterized by stop-and-go traffic with stoppages of long duration. A description of the various levels of service appears on the following page. The ICU calculations assume that an intersection is signalized and that the signal is ideally timed. Although calculating ICU for an unsignalized inter- section is not valid, the presumption is that a signal can be installed and the calculation shows whether the geometries are capable of accommodating the ex- pected volume. It is possible to have an ICU well below 1.0, -yet have severe traffic congestion. This would occur because one or more movements is not getting enough time to satisfy its demand with excess time existing on other moves. Capacity is often defined in terms of roadway width. However, standard lanes have appr.oximate.l.y the scune capacity whether they. are .1.1 foot or 1.4 foot lanes. Our data indicates a typical lane, whether a through lane or left-turn lane has a cpaacity of approximately 1600 vehicles per lane per hour of green time. The Highway Capacity Manual found capacity to be about 1500 vehicles per lane per hour of green for through lanes and 1200 vehicles per lane per hour of green for left-turn lanes. However, the capacity manual is based on pre-1965 data, and recent studies and observations show higher capacities in the southern California area. For this study a capacity of 1600 vehicles per lane has been assumed for through traffic, and 1600 vehicles per Lane for turning lanes. A-21 • • INTRODUCTION On January 4, 1978, a meeting was held between Envista and the City of • Huntington Beach Planning Department to review the initial study that was pre- pared for the proposed project. • It was determined that traffic and land use compatibility were the primary concerns associated with the proposed skateboard park. Other impacts of this project include those resulting from noise and safety. • Items that did not appear to result in potentially significant impacts for the proposed project include: air quality, archaeology, biology, and water quality. • • • • • B-1 • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM • I. BACKGROUND • 1 . Name of proponent: Universal Skate Park, Inc. 2. Address and telephone number of proponent: 17612 Beach Boulevard, Suite 18 • Huntington Beach, California 92647 (714) 546-4200 3. Date checklist submitted: January 4, 1978 • 4. Agency requiring checklist: City of Huntington Beach Planning Department • 5. . Name of proposal, if applicable: Olympic Skateboard Park • 11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers are required.) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction, or overcovering of the soil? Discussion: Prior to construction of the skateboard park facility, grading operations will include • compaction of subgrade materials according to the specifications B-2 • • Yes Maybe No • outlined in the soils and geology report. Subsequent emplacement of fill to achieve the desired topography will also need to be properly compacted. • c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x Discussion: In order to achieve • proper slope gradients for the various skateboard courses, some alteration in topography will result. d. The destruction, covering, or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? x_ e. Any increase in wind or water ero- sion of soils, either on or off the • site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may • modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet, or lake? X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? x _ Discussion: Emissions generated • for automobile trips of cus- tomers to and from the park. b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ x_ • B-3 • Yes Maybe No • c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? - X • 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in Other marine or fresh waters? • b. Changes in absorption rates, drain- age patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Discussion: It is generally antici- pated that the direction and amount of surface runoff will increase due to the construc- tion of impermeable concrete and asphalt surfaces for the • skateboard park. c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface • water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality including, but not limited • to, temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of groundwaters? X _ • g. Change in the quantity of ground- waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through Interception of an aquifer by cuts • or excavations? X B-4 • Yes Maybe No h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X _ 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and aquatic plants) ? _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing speci es? Discussion: As part of the pro- posed project, landscaping will be provided throughout the park. d. Reduction in acreage of any agricul- tural crop? X _ S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects, or microfauna) ? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? ,X B-5 Yes Maybe No c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ X_ 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase exist- ing noise levels? �- Discussion: The project site is currently vacant and experiences no noise related to its land use. The imple- mentation of a skateboard park will result in increased noise and vibra- tion levels within the vicinity due to traffic, spectators, and participants at the facility. Exact amounts and the magnitude of the impact on the surrounding area is currently unknown. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal pro- duce new I ight or glare? X_ Discussion: The proposed project will include floodlighting for nighttime activities. Night lighting will, in itself, create new light and possibly additional glare. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? �- B-6 Yes Maybe No 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Discussion: Additional usage of electricity for nighttime light- ing will result from the pro- posed project. b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resource? , X _ Discussion: Depletion of fossil fuel or other energy sources will occur in the generation of additional electricity. The magnitude of this impact for the proposed project is con- sidered to be insiginficant. 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 11 . Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human popula- tion of an area? X _ 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ X _ B-7 Yes Maybe No 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? _ X_ b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? X_ c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X_ e. Alterations to waterborne, rail, or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? X _ Discussion: Pertaining to 13a through 13f, a detailed traffic study will be necessary to properly assess those impacts on transportation and circulation related to the proposed project. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? Discussion: Potential injuries, other than ones considered minor, will require the services of the Paramedics Division of the Huntington Beach Fire Depart- ment. B-8 Yes Maybe No b. Police protection? X Discussion: During special events, such as tournaments, crowd and traffic problems may be incurred. Under these condi- tions, additional services of the Huntington Beach Police Department would probably be necessary. c. Schools? - X_ d. Parks or other recreational facili- ties? X _ Discussion: The proposed pro- ject will expand park facilities. e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? X__ 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X _ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develop- ment of new sources of energy? X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? X _ B-9 Yes Maybe No c. Water? X____ d. Sewer or septic tanks? _X e. Storm water drainage? _X _ f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Discussion: The potential for personal injury is present with this type of recreational activity. The frequen- cy of occurrence and the magnitude of any potential injuries, will depend in part on enforcement of safety rules. A First Aid Center in the Pro Shop is proposed to handle all minor injuries. 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? y__ 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Discussion: The proposed skateboard park will provide one more recrea- tional opportunity for its citizens. The impact upon recreation is considered to be positive, in that B-10 Yes Maybe No the implementation of the skate- board park will act to upgrade the quality of Huntington Beach's rec- reational facilities. 20. Archaeological/Historical. Will the pro- posal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archaeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? , 2�__ 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the poten- tial to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diver- sity in the environment? _x _ Discussion: Implementation of the project will initiate a change in park use from one of a passive nature to a more active one. This might affect the surrounding park envi- ronment. b. Does the project have the poten- tial to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, envi- ronmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time, while long-term impacts will-endure well into the future.) x _ Discussion: The project will cause this portion of the park to become more productive. Currently, there is no master B-11 Yes Maybe No plan for Huntington Central Park to guide future park development. The skateboard park will bring about a more active nature for park use in contrast to its present passive nature.. c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project • may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small•, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. Discussion: The proposed project is situated within Huntington Central Park and is generally compatible with respect to land use. However, there is the possibility that the project might adversely impact upon the surrounding areas due to glare, noise, and traffic. d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Discussion: The proposed project has the potential to adversely effect participants due to safety. B-12 • III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION • The construction of the Olympic Skateboard Park adjacent to Talbert Avenue along Golden West Street has the potential to result in unde- sirable effects upon the environment. Primary impacts are associated with traffic and circulation along Golden West, parking, glare due to • lighting, noise, and safety. Other potential impacts resulting from the project include compatibility with surrounding land uses, geology, and economics. IV. DETERMINATION • (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on • the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached • sheet have been added to the project. 1 find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the en- vironment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. • ORIG)NAL SIGNED Date • Signature For • • B-13 • ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM General Information • 1 . Name and address of developer or project sponsor: City of Huntington Beach Recreation, Parks & Human Services Dept. P. O. Box 190 • Huntington Beach, California 92648 2. Address of project: Northwest side of intersection of Golden West Street • and Talbert Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach. Assessor's Block and Lot Number: DNA • 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concern- ing this project: • Norm Worthy Director of Recreation, Parks & Human Services City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5486 • 4. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: • DNA S. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by City, regional, • State, and Federal agencies: None B-14 • 6. Existing zoning district: • Quasi-public/parks. Present use of site: Presently, the project site is part of the Huntington Central Park and is currently vacant. 7. Proposed use of site (project for which this form is filed) : • The proposed project is to develop a 15-acre portion of Huntington Central Park, which is currently vacant, into a skateboard park facility. • Project Description 8. Site size: The project site is approximately 15 acres in size. • 9. Square footage: Pro shop - 2,000 sq. ff. Beginning skateboard course - 20, 000 sq. ft. • Intermediate skateboard course - 22,000 sq. ft. Advanced skateboard course - 30,000 sq. ft. Slalom run - 22,000 sq. ft. Parking, 2 acres - 10,560 sq. ft. • 10. Number of floors of construction: DNA • 11 . Amount of off-street parking provided: 2-acre parking lot. • B-15 • • 12. Attach plans: • See Figure 13. Proposed scheduling: • Total construction period is 9 months. 14. Associated projects: • None 15. Anticipated incremental development: • None 16. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household and household • size expected: DNA 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, City or • regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: The proposed project can be described as City/regionally oriented. During normal business hours, City residents • are expected to be the primary users of the park facilities. However, special events held at the skateboard park will probably draw participants and spectators from through- out Orange County. • 18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: DNA • B-16 • • 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per • shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: DNA • 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning applica- tion, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: None • Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary) . • YES NO X 21 . Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes, or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. • _X 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residen- tial areas or public lands or roads. Discussion: The construction of earthen berms • and other various landforms for the skate- board park will impact upon the scenic views from Golden West and the surrounding park areas onto the site. This impact is generally considered to be positive, in that the proposed • project is consistent with the City Is General Plan land use designation and that landscaping of the park site will be accomplished by the end of the construction phase. • 23. Change in pattern, scale, or character of general area of project. Discussion: While the project site is part of Hunting- ton Central Park, it is presently vacant. The • proposed project would cause this portion of B-17 • YES NO the park to become more productive, serving its citizens, and would act to improve the overall visual aesthetics and views onto the park from Golden West Street and the surround- ing park land. 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity. _ X 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream, or groundwater quality, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. X_ 27. Change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. Discussion: The project site is currently vacant and experiences no noise related to its land use. The implementation of a skateboard park will result in increased-noise and vibration levels within the vicinity due to traffic, spectators, and participants at the facility. Exact amounts and the magnitude of the impact on the surround- ing area is currently unknown. 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. Discussion: The proposed project site is charac- terized by a knoll trending in an east-west direction through a portion.of the site with variable slopes, some exceeding 10 percent in grade. As reported in a previous soils and geology study for the Huntington Library, areas immediately surrounding the knoll are underlain by unconsolidated trash and fill materials. At present, an updated geology study has not been conducted for the current project. B-18 YES NO • _X 29. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables, or explosives. • X_ .30. Change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) . Discussion: The implementation of the proposed project will result in an increased need for police and fire services. Paramedics will • be summoned to render assistance for all but minor injuries sustained by participants and spectators. _X 31 . Increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.) . Discussion: The proposed skateboard park will be fully lighted for nighttime activities. As a • result, increased use of electricity should be anticipated. The pro shop will also use elec- tricity for lighting and perhaps natural gas for heating. _X 32. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. Environmental Setting 34. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including Information on topography, soil stability, plants, and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photo- graphs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. The project site is currently vacant. Existing vege- tation consists of various weeds, grasses, and land- scaped pine trees and shrubs. The landscaped vegetation occurs along the western boundary of the project site. Here, the site is adjacent to other B-19 developed park land. No wildlife was observed on the site. Topographically, the site is characterized by an east-west trending knoll which extends through the central portion of the site. North and south of the knoll, are lowland areas where some grading and uncontrolled dumping of trash and fill materials has taken place. Due to this activity, some ques- tion as to the stability of subgrade soils exists; and a detailed soil and geologic study should be conducted to determine the suitability of the site for the proposed project. No significant cultural or historic aspects are known to exist with respect to the project site. 35. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.) , intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) , and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.) . Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. Surrounding land use immediately adjacent to the pro- ject site consists predominantly of park and recreational land. The Huntington Beach Library and Cultural Resource Center is Iocated to the east of the project site, across Golden West Street. Land south of Talbert Road and east of Golden West is presently vacant. The City's Huntington Beach General Plan has designated this area for recreation and open space. Therefore, it will eventually be developed and included into the Central Park boundaries. Views from the project site onto surrounding areas is typical of park land and recreational development, characterized by abundant native and introduced landscaped vegetation. Wildlife known to exist in the surrounding vicinity in- cludes mud hens, roosters, guinea hens, pheasants, ducks, and miscellaneous birds. B-20 • The Central Park area was first inhabited by early • Indian tribes. Later, farmers settled raising celery, sugar beets, and other various crops. CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in • the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my know- ledge and belief. • ORIGINAL SIGNED: ._ Date Signature • For • • • • • B-21 • • J� City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 FIRE DEPARTMENT RECEIVED JAN 1 2 ►`Iis January 10, 1978 ENVISTA. INC. Envista, Inc. 1745 Orangewood. Ave. Suite 210 Orange, CA 92668 Attn : Tim C. Welch Dear Mr. Welch : .The Information which you have requested concerning a skateboard facility within the Huntington Beach Central Park Is as follows : The nearest Fire Station will be Gothard Fire Station which is located on Gothard Street just north of Ellis Avenue. The estimated emergency response time to the project site would be 5 minutes or less 90% of the time. There are no major impacts to the Fire Depart- ment and no major problems are anticipated for a facility as described in your letter. The Fire Department' s concerns will be with access to the site and properly designed on-site circulation for Fire Department equipment and operations. Please advise me if additional information is required. Yours truly Captain Mel Ott Deputy Fire Marshal MO: cw CC. Chief Gerspach C-1 • • POLICE DEPARTMENT City of Huntington Beach • + P.O.BOX 70 • 2000 MAIN STREET,HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA.92648 • TELs(714)536-5311 EARLE ROBITAILLE Cbief of Police January 23, 1978 • Mr. Tim C. Welch Environment Geologist ENVISTA PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 1745 Orangewood Avenue, Suite 210 • Orange, California 92668 Dear Mr. Welch: The following is a reply to your request for environmental impact report information on a proposed skateboard park in the Huntington Beach Central Park. The Huntington Beach Police Department is located in the 2100 block of Main Street in the City of Huntington Beach. This location is a distance of approximately two miles from the proposed skateboard park construction site. • The estimated emergency response time to the park location would be immediate .to five minutes. The police department maintains regular patrols throughout this area and the rest of the city. In most cases, there will be adequate coverage to respond to calls on an immediate basis. There are three areas that the police department feels would impact our operation: 1. The parking problem is not properly provided for. As the information provided by your company identifies 200 parking spots for 2,000 people. It is not practical to plan parking on the basis of ten passengers per vehicle. A more conservative estimate of two to three passengers per vehicle would be more realistic. Not only is this inadequate parking space, but there is an extreme lack of off the highway parking in this area. To be exact, on the west edge of Golden West Street, between Slater and Talbert, (a 1/2 mile segment of roadway) , there is only one small parking lot at the entrance to Matney's Mesa park site. This lot is over- loaded on the weekends because of a recently constructed frisbee/golf course in that area of the park. This facility has become very attractive and is attracting more people every weekend. It should be pointed out that Golden West Street is not curbed in the area of the park. The use of parking on the east side of Golden West is impractical because of the heavy traffic of this four lane highway. During the summer months, this is a direct highway to the beach and traffic is extremely heavy. —Address all communications to the Chief of Police — D-1 MR. TIM C. WELCH JANUARY 20, 1978 ENVISTA PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES PAGE 2 2. Security to the property is a major concern of the police department. The main focal point of this problem will be the pro-shop because of the remote location and the strong desire for young people to possess expensive skateboarding equipment that will be contained in this location. Strong security measures will have to be taken to protect this equipment, alarm systems and bright lighting will have to be provided. An example of this problem is a skateboard park in the City of Buena Park called Skatotopla. During the past month, the Buena Park Police Department has had to 'investigate six commercial burglaries of the pro-shop at Skatotopla. The property will require a high security fence to keep unauthorized trespassers out of the area at night time. These type of locations attract alot of persons who want to sneak over the fence and utilize the operation when it is not open to the public. 3. The department is concerned with the impact that the skateboard park will have on the Central City Park and residents surrounding the park. Lighting of the facility, if not properly located, could be very annoying to the residents around the park. Noise and the crowds of young people that would be attracted to the location will also have an impact on the residents of the area. Here again, an adjacent city's experience should be considered. At the present time, the City of Irvine is being-,sued by a group of residents who live adjacent to a skateboard park that is located in the city public park. The basis of this suit is the fact that the park is very annoying to residential living. In writing this report, it is very difficult to project what the police problems will be at a skateboard park of this magnitude. Of the cities that were contacted, the average skateboard park is under two acres. No one has any real idea what type of police manpower needs would be generated by a 15 acre skateboard operation. Some of the cities contacted were; . Carlsbad, Carson City, Westminster, Buena Park, City of Irvine and Anaheim. In contacting these above named cities, they predominately each pointed out that the main problem with skateboard parks is the requirement to provide prompt medical aid. It appears that the fire department is impacted much greater than the police department because of the paramedic type service calls. Here again, the City of Westminster has just recently closed a skateboard park located on city property because their insurance carrier has refused to continue covering their liability. In summation, all evidence points to a real concern to provide medical aid for a very dangerous sport. A recent news article pointed out that -40o of those injured required hospitalization. Skateboarding rates as the most dangerous of all amateur sports, overtaking football, in the past year. Unless strong measures are taken to protect the City's liability, the financial impact of this operation could be great. Sincerely, EARLE W. ROBITAILLE Chief of Police EWR:BTE:sd D-2 J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES 1782 W. LINCOLN AVENUE, SUITE A, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92801 (714) 635-9520 • JOHN J. VAN HOUTEN, PE Consulting Engineer in Acareticm January 27, 1978 Report No. 620-78 ENVISTA, INC. 1745 Orangewood Avenue, Suite 210 Orange, California 92668 Attention: Richard Schmid • Subject: Noise Assessment - Proposed Olympic Skateboard Park in the City of Huntington Beach Gentlemen: • The existing and projected noise associated with the subject park has been examined and the impact of the noise has been assessed. Where significant impacts are expected, methods of mitigation are recommended. The assessment includes noise measurements at locations in proximity to the site and at two existing Skateboard Parks in Fountain Valley and Anaheim. The potential impact of crowd noise is considered and • that of sound amplification systems are included in the assessment. EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS The ambient noise levels now experienced at locations in proximity to • the proposed site have been measured. This is the noise that now exists at or near residential locations from sources both near and far. It involves both traffic noise from the near-by arterials as well as light aircraft movements overhead and nearby. The measurement locations are indicated in Figure 1 . Measurements were • recorded on both a Saturday daytime period, as well as during a late night period on .a Saturday. The information obtained is summarized as follows: A-Weighted Sound Level , dB(A)* Measurement Location L90 L50 L10 Leg Measuremt. Period (1 ) 48.5 52.5 60.0 57.3 Day 47.0 50.0 54.5 52. 5 Night (2) 47.0 50.8 62.0 57.6 Day 48.5 50.0 55.0 52.3 Night (3) 49.3 52.5 56.3 53.5 Day 48.0 50.0 54.0 51 .4 Night * Refer to Appendix 1 for an explanation of the A-weighted measure of noise. • E-1 • ENVISTA/Schmid Report No. 620-78 January 27, 1978 Page 2 • Typical Data sheets with graphic level recordings of the noise measured at each location are provided in Sheets 1 through 6. Appendix II provides a brief description of the instrumentation used to acquire the data. • SKATEBOARD ACTIVITY NOISE The noise produced by the wheel/cement interaction of the skateboard is minimal in comparison to traffic and aircraft noise outside the park or crowd noise of the spectators and participants. In addition to the crowd noise a potential source of annoyance at residential locations in • proximity to the Park involves the use of sound amplification equipment for paging and/or communication with the participants and spectators within the park. The noise measured in proximity to two existing Parks and the crowd and amplification equipment noise are discussed in the following: • Noise Measurement at Existing Parks Noise measurements were obtained at Skateboard Parks i.n.. Anaheim and Fountain Valley. In both cases the noise produced by the wheel/cement interaction was negligible. At the Fountain Valley facility the noise of an adjacent Go Cart operation predominated along with loud music being played in the Park. Traffic noise was experienced at both facilities as was the noise produced by participants. Graphic recordings of the data obtained is provided in Sheets 7 and 8. The location of the measure- ment position for the Anaheim Park is indicated in Figure 2. The Foun- tain Valley measurement was recorded at a position 25 feet from the fence separating the skate course from the parking lot. • Crowd Noise A source of potential impact due to the proposed development is the noise produced by the crowd of spectators watching skateboard events. Data on crowd noise is very sparse and usually not well documented. However, • one .source of information concerning baseball crowd noise is the Pre- liminary Environmental Impact Study of the UCLA Campus Baseball Facility.* Correlation between the crowd produced noise at a College Baseball Game . and that of a Skateboard Park is not immediately obvious, but some of the data in the UCLA Study is informative. • Three independent analyses of peak crowd noise were conducted for the UCLA Project. In 1973, the late Dr. Vern Knudsen of the UCLA Physics Department measured noise levels from a crowd of 17 people and extrapolated this data to predict noise from a crowd of 1 ,000. In 1974, Dr. Richard Stern of UCLA measured peak noise levels from a crowd of 450 people, and in 1975, Dr. Marshall Long, a Principal Consultant with Long/Davy/Associates, mea- sured peak noise levels from a crowd of 1 ,036 people. These three measure- ments are summarrized in Table .l on the following page: * Prepared by Planning Environment International for the UCLA Office of the Chancellor, August, 1975. • J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES E-2 • ENVISTA/Schmid Report No. 620-78 Page 3 • TABLE 1 Measured Peak (Maximum) Noise Levels from Crowds at College Baseball Games • Peak (Maximum) Crowd Size Distance Noise Level 1973 —Knudsen 1 ,000 450 feet 78-88 dBA 1974 - Stern 450 400 feet 88 dBA • 1975 -Long 1 ,036 250 feet 80 dBA In order to make a comparison of the data in Table 1 , it has been cor- rected to a crowd size of 100 people and a distance of 700 feet - the approximate distance from the viewing stands adjacent to the Free Skating, • Skate Basic and Slalom areas of the proposed park and the nearest residen- tial locations along Cliffview Lane. It was assumed for these corrections that noise levels will increase by 6 dB for every halving of distance and at a given distance, noise levels will decrease by 3 dB for every halving of crowd size. The results • of the analysis are given in Table 2 below: TABLE 2 Maximum Noise Levels from Crowds (All Data Corrected to a Crowd Size of 100 and Distance of 700 Feet) • 700 Feet 1973 - Knudsen 64-74 dB(A) 1974 - Stern 76 dB(A) • 1975 - Long 61 dB(A) Assuming the result from Dr. Stern's data to be most representative and further assuming that crowd noise is only projected from the Viewing Stands toward an easterly direction, it is estimated that the levels indicated in Table 3 will exist at the nearest residential location.* * It is assumed that at least a six dB reduction in noise occurs if the crowd essentially projects noise only to the east, away from the near- est homes. • • J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES E-3 • ENVISTA/Schmid Report No. 620-78 January 27, 1978 Page 4 • TABLE 3 Maximum Noise Levels from Crowds Crowd Size Distance, 700 Feet • 100 70 dB(A) 200 73 500 77 1000 80 2000 83 Sound Amplification System Noise • It is likely that sound amplification systems will be used to communicate with both the spectators in the various viewing stands and the partici- pants within the Park. The sound from these systems, when experienced at nearby residential locations could be annoying. In order to be effective, the sound level of the amplified sound at the • spectator locations, should be about 70 to 75 dB(A) . When experienced at the residential locations the amplified sound levels may be as high as 47 to even 52 dB(A) , if mitigation methods are not applied to reduce the noise. ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT • The noise levels previously cited for crowd noise and amplified sound would be considered excessive, if experienced at the residential loca- tions to the west. The levels cited would cause annoyance and would contribute a significant impact if not reduced to acceptable levels. • When experienced at the residential locations nearest to the site ampli- fied sound from the various communications systems used in the Park should not exceed the ambient sound level . That is, during the day and nighttime the level of amplified sound should be no more than about 47 dB(A) when measured at the homes to the west of the site. Crowd noise may be above the level of the ambient background noise, when • experienced at the homes, but should not exceed the background by more then 3 to 5 decibels. Hence, to minimize or eliminate annoyance, it is recommended that mitigation methods be applied to limit the potentially intrusive crowd noise level , at the nearest homes, to no more then 55 dB(A) during the daytime hours. (7 am to 10 pm) and 50 dB(A) from (10 pm to 7 am) . • * The analysis leading to this result was in part obtained from: "Noi.se Impact Considerations for the Proposed Little League Field at Center School , Manhattan Beach, CA" prepared by Long/Davy/Associates September 13, 1977. E-4 J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES • ENVISTA/Schmid Report No. 620-78 January. 27, 1978 Page 5 • MITIGATION OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS Mitigation of the potentially significant impact which may be caused by the crowd noise produced by both the participants and spectators is • accomplished as follows: 1 . Lower the elevation of the various skating areas which are nearest to the homes to the west of the site. 2. Provide a noise barrier along the westerly boundary of • the site. The barrier may be an earth berm and/or a con- crete block, concrete slab or metal wall . 3. Locate the noise producing events involving both partici- pants and spectators at the positions of the site nearest to Golden West Ave. • 4. The viewing stands nearest to the homes to the west should be provided with walls on the north, west and south side of the stand and a canopy over a portion of the stand. The stands should only face with spectator orientation to the east. • 5. Acoustic baffles in the form of .wing walls may be required on each side of the viewing stands nearest to the homes to the west. The sound amplification systems used to communicate with spectators and • participants should include design features to minimize sound propaga- tion to the west. These design features should include Baffles and horns designed to confine the sound to specific areas or project it to the east away from the homes. A loudspeaker placed in the center of a large baffle (about 10' x 10' ) • and located at .the sound end of the stands will produce minimal sound levels at near-by residential locations. The speech levels experienced at these locations will be clearly discernable, but probably not annoy- ing, if the sound level at the stands is maintained at a reasonable level (no more than 65 to 70 dB(A). • The above approach, although considered workable, is difficult to con- trol and assure that annoyance, will not occur at residential locations in proximity to the park. The following alternatives may provide satis- factory communication levels and minimal annoyance at the residential locations: • E-5 • J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES • ENVISTA/Schmid Report No. 620-78 January 27, 1978 Page 6 • 1 . The use of a megaphone (no amplification) will insure that the speech communication is directed to those intended at acceptable sound levels. 2. The use of a hand held megaphone with sound amplification • and the announcer at a location near the south east corner of the stands. At this location, he will be able to com- municate with the spectators at minimal sound levels. CONCLUSION • Noise may be produced by both the participants and spectators which could be annoying if experienced at residential locations to the west of the site. Standards which assure that annoyance at these locations will be minimized or eliminated have been cited. Reduction of the crowd noise and amplified sound to these standards is possible, but must be accom- plished as an integral part of the project design. This portion of • the design effort will identify noise barrier heights, lengths and con- figurations. The design and location of the viewing areas. should also be considered as part of the project planning. Please contact the undersigned at (714) 635-9520 if you require additional information or clarification of our findings. • Very truly yours, J. VAN HOUTEN ASSOCI TES John J. Van uten, P.E. f'�:Ida No. m Consulting ngineer in Acoustics Enclosures • JJVH:bae 9��,cF CAOF���`� • • • J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES E-6 • • .2 • • • CL/�FYIEvV LN . O EXISTING HOMES A axc ws> j • Figure 1 Measurement Locations in Proximity to the Proposed Skateboard Park, Huntington Beach • E-7 SANTA A-9k K*tWAV r.e. • SKATE WK • pA�RKcNC� �oT o OBIWT A L APARTMEMrS CJ Figure 2 Noise Measurement Position Adjacent to the "Concrete Wave" Skateboard Park, Anaheim 1 E-8 b90 - --- grUet 8� Kiz* - > 80 — — -- -- - - - = - 70 -- _--'--- - -- �, 60 - - _ o - y — - A 50 eo - _ t _.. Qe mot . 0 99 PROJECT: YT-Di.c.Skateboard Park _ - I ASLRE;%U:NT LOCATION: _DLO. 1 w 95 -- - - - - •+ 90 I ' SOURCE: _ Aircraft Iraffic o a 80 - 1-- --�- - - 70 ! - DATE: January 21 - 197860 C: 11�Q5 60 TI - 3t 50 F 40 A-Weighted Sound Level: IV4.1 30 - - - L90_ 48.5 L5 50_ 2.5 L1 60�0.0 dB(A) r= 20 H Equivalent Sound Level, Leq 57.3 dB(A) c IO ` � 5 ca Sheet 1 of 8 -- J. ). VAN IIC)tITF\, & ASSOCIATES 130 40 50 60 70 80 90 A-`dcig`;ted sound level,, dB(A) 100 -- ---- -- - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Proel & Kjaer in b 90 80 mef 'd 70 O 0 60 - v - - a� y, y Jl/ I L _ 40 QP 0102 v 99 - 0 m PROJECT: Oly!ipic Skateboard Park m - o - MEASUREMENT LOCATION: No. 2 w 95 --- - - - 90 i SOURCE: Aircraft a 80 DATE: January 21 , 1978 + 70 TIME: 11 .28 6060 - 3 50 I 40 A-Weighted Sound Level: \ � - �, 30 - L 47.0 L 10.8 L 62.0 dB(A) w 20 — 90•---- 5a--- 10------ t, 57.6 ' Equivalent Sound Level, Leq dB(A) 0 10. 5 Sheet 2 of 8 �, ]. ]. VAN 11OUTE\? & ASSOCIATES 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 A- `e' soun' level, dB(A) 100 --- --- - --- - - - -- - -- - - - -- - -- ----- - -- ----- -- ---- -- -- b90 - — - — BrUel KJ�r — 70 ---- -- 0 °0 60- It— b jb d x eo — m - 3 40 QP 0102 0 99 PROJECT: _ Olympic Skateboard Park IV m -- _ MEASUREMENT LOCATION: N0. 3 w 95 SOURCE: Traffic -+ 90 y a 80 —-- -- -- DATE: January 21 , 1978 70 TIME: 12:00 ,bo 60 ---- -- -- -- 3 50 i a 40 - - A-Weighted Sound Level: m L 49.3 L 52.5 L 56.3 dB(A) 20 90--- 50---- 10- , — I 53.5 H + Equivalent Sound Level, Leq dB(A) c 10 • I 00 5 m Sheet 3 of 8 w J. J. VAN HOUTE N & ASSOCIATES 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 A-Weighted sound level, dB(A) 100 90 Broal Kjaer --- 80 70 60 w 50 4 0 Q?0102 99 PROJECT: DlympiE Skateboard Park m .1o. 1 x WASURE�IMNT LOCATION: Location t 95 SOURCE: Traffic m90 w .1 80 DATE: January 21 1978 70 bo 60 TI!E: 21 :15 "-1 50 40 A-Weighted Sound Level: 41 30 L 47.0 L .1 LIn 54.5 dB(A) 'v 20 . gn 50- r= E- Equivalent Sound Level, L 52.5 dB(A) 10 eq I af 5 Sheet 4 of 8 1 J. VAN HOUTEN.- & Assrcmns, 10 t 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 A-Wei&'Ited sourid level, dB(A) 100 ----- - --- --- --- --------- - -- - --------- -- --- ---- - .�, 90 --- > 80 — _ -__-_�-- - --- - _ — 0 70 a -- -- a 60 - - - 't7 - y - - L— ao 50 3r 40 - 4 v 99 PROJECT: 01YEDDic Skateboard Park - m MEASMEVE WN`I LOCATION: No: 2 x 95 ----r - -- - � W � Aircraft an4—Ir�ffic 90 ` SOURCE: m � ; 80 ! — -- — — - -- DATE: January 21 • _1978 y 70 TII 21 :35 0060 -- -- -- 3 50 i < 40 L ' A-Wei hted Sound Level: �' y 30 - - - - — --- — L90- 48.5 1,50 5-0-_Q-- L10_� dB(A) E 20 H Equivalent Sound Level, L 52.3 dB(A) eq c 10 t 5 -- — d Sheet 5 of 2 J- V`.N 1i0LY11: F� ASSOCIA-I-ES a 1 — )• 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 A-�'eig''ted sojnd level, dB(A) 100 — ------- - - - - - - ------- ---- — --- — - - •v 90 Broef & Kpar 80 -- --- ---------- 70 a o - °p 60 �s 0 50 - m 3 - 40 cr 0102 a 99 PROJECT: Olympic Skateboard Park 0 m MEAST`REI�N'T LOCATION: Flo. 3 � 95 ----t - — - I , SO Background Background Noise Only -1 90 m 80 DATE• January 21 , 1978 70 TIMfr.: 22.16 ,°�° 60 - --- — — 50 � 40 — A-Weighted Sound Level: y 30 - — - - - -f --- j L90. 48.0 L5 n50. Lla 54.0— dB(A) E 20 Equivalent Sound Level, L 51 .4 dB(A) �++ 10 el, o _ d eo � 5 Sheet 6 of 8 --- — - - - — - - a, - j• j. VIAN HOUTEN & P.SSOCL TES 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 A 'f - sound level. dB(A) b 90 BrUei & Kj" 70 -- - 93 0 v 60 m a.r � S0 - eo V4 < 40 QP 0102 99 i PROJECT: 01;mpic Skateboard Park m - - I 1KEASLU-EMIT LOCATION: "Concrete Wave" w 95 ---- i - -- _ -- Ln g , SOTMCE: Traffic and Participants 90 ; .� 80 — — DATE: —January soi 70 TDMI : 13.21 ` 3 50 40 A-Weighted Sound Level: — — „ 30 L 59.0 L 50 61 .3 L 64.8 dB(A) -0 20 i N � Equivalent Sound Level, Leq 62.5 dB(A) c 10 ' - i 00 5 - Sheet 7 of 8 . m I. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES 130. 40 50 60 70 80 90 A-Weighted sound level, dB(A) 100 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- - -- — --- —90- ------ Met & Kim- 80-- 70- IF 60 X aa 50 - 40- QP 0102 99 PROJECT: 01YTIDiC Skateboard Park mzAsuRE -_Nn LOCATION: Fountain Vallpy g4 95 sona: Traffic and Part 90 -cipants 80 • 0 70 DATE: January 21 , 1978 .0 X 60 ao ME: 12:35 50 40 A-Weighted Sound Level: w 0 3 Lq_ _5 L Ll&j dB(A) 20 Equivalent Sound Level, Leq 75.0 dB(A) 10 5 Lt_ Sheet 8 of 8 T w a. 1 VANHOUTEN & AssociATES 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 A-1weilghted sourid level, dB(A) APPENDIX I A-WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL, A-LEVEL The scale of measurement which is most useful in community noise measure- ment is the A-weighted sound pressure level , commonly called A-level or d6(A) . To establish the A-weighted level , the acoustic signal is detected by the microphone and then filtered, heavily weighting those portions of the noise which are most annoying to individuals. The root-mean-square (P14S) value of this weighted signal is then read, utilizing a conventional sound level meter. It is interesting to note that the A-weighted filter characteristic actually amplifies the signal at frequencies between 1000 and 5000 .Hz. At frequencies substantially above and below this range, it Beverly rejects the acoustic signal . This weighting of sound energy cor- responds approximately to the relative annoyance produced by noise at various frequencies. The A-weighted sound pressure levels of -a few typical sources of noise are listed on the next page. The A-weighted sound level of traffic and other long term noise producing activities within and around a community varies considerably with time. Measurements of this varying noise level are accomplished by recording values of the A-weighted level during representative periods within a speci- fied portion of the day. The values recorded are: L90 - the near minimum Sound Level , which occurs during the measurement period. 90% of the time the A-weighted sound level is greater than this value. L50 - The central tendency of sound level . This value is exceeded 5 of t e time during the measurement inter- val . L10 - The near maximum A-weighted sound level . This value is exceeded 0% of the time during the measurement interval . Depending on the degree of noise level variation, A-weighted sound level is recorded for periods of from 12 to 60 minutes to provide representative samples of the noise during the time period being examined (i .e. morning, afternoon and night). The statistical values of these samples (Lg0, L50, L10, etc. ) are then considered representative of the sound level during that particular time period. I-1 J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES E-1 7 NOISE SOURCES AND NOISE LEVELS 1:>u i res�,o d of Pa n Small Aircraft Engine Overhead 7620 110 Riveting ISachine 30 to 40 Feet 100 Train Passing, 50 Feet 90 Automobile Horn 59 Feet Away 80 Noisy Stenographic Room 70 Average Conversation, 3 Feet 60 Noisy Office 50 Noisy Residence, Interior Quiet Office 40 Voice-Very Soft Whisper, 3 Feet 30 20 10 Outdoor in Rural Area Threshold of Audibility 0 A-weighted Sound Level , dB(A) I-2 E-18 J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES APPENDIX II ,NOISE MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT The following items of equipment were used during the course of the noise measurement program: 1 . A-Weighted Noise Level - Analysis Community Noise Level Analyzer, B & K Type '4426 2. Precision Sound Level Measurement per ANSI S1 .4-1971 Sound Level Meter, B & K Type .2203 3. Acoustic Calibration Acoustic Calibrator, B & K Type 4230, (94 dB @ 1000 Hz.) 4. Graphic Level Recording Graphic Level Recorder, B & K Type 2306 5. Measurement of Atmospheric Conditions Portable Wind Meter, Dwyer Instruments Sling Psychrometer, Weksler Instruments, Type 317 Barometer, B & K Type UZ 0001 E_19 J� r Y of rL. L•J-. k1 k.5�jr Q.-.,p iI :c Level Yrr ACOUSTIC CALIBRATOR �' ;�: rc'lq (!t • j i 4` I � eel•Y t� �,�.. �, L l �+ i II r d77/DF"7•r1' j 11! 1" - CONDENSER MICROPHONE' Noise Levei Analyzer c nd statisticc6 Processo► I � Nap Lswl A.Mir"or Type 4426 ,1;:rr N111nD.l O/6.�nIdC..l00D •r•el•14- •dm1d7 O•n�le.d C•I..d71• F-0. -4 8-0.Pnrb. A-U. Ch.....N.M11h, D1p1.Y fun.W. d. dD .•11 Ch-, ' 1 ] ..-110 ..-170 !.7.77 p0 cum w A..0 14.0n f .r 0.5 • ]•-ton • ..-170 ..••••.,•D 011-1. �/ ' C.I. ls:�i'�. •. //// Or,per` oA, �10 7..-•D•.' �'•Conlnd /7: �.. Dbh.w,Ili ,` •tp f\\�, -61 C•nunr i% ��.. �•.• drrun. t. - Y ••D ••mld•. • • �N u.--r.odel •mme lwa on - cn.n„•I 1..1. OM.Daum Id•nnPr.nun N•ur Om 1••1 -�...�..--� M•.tw•I .�- •.••• 1� 5 1q r11N. I ImmA•n� ✓II I .In.. �.r...l•....�.r1t Iw1.n11•wl � �.L�..�.1•�J •Im1 L Figure III-] Noise Measurement Instrumentation E-20 �r • • planning & environmental sciences 1745 Orangewood Avenue•Suite 210.Orange, California 92668.714/639-8100 1825 North Oxnard Boulevard■Suite 22.Oxnard, California 93030.805/486-0757 1130 Missouri Avenue East•Phoenix, Arizona 85014.602/248-8637 • • �I �- Environmental council CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH Post Office Box 190 0 Huntington Beach, California 92648 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Environmental Council DATE: May 15, 1978 SUBJECT: Olympic Skateboard Park EIR The Environmental Council reviewed the Draft EIR for the Olympic Skateboard Park, and submitted comments March 7, 1978 . These comments were responded to in the Final EIR, and the Environmental Council is making a presentation of remaining inadequacies before the Parks and Recreation Commission. We wish to address to you some of our major concerns about the project to be considered before final action is taken on this large commercial venture. Comments and Recommendations: 1. In June 1969 , 74 . 3% of the voters voted for the $6 million bond issue for acquisition and development of 32 neighborhood parks, 6 high-activity community parks as Murdy and Edison, and large, passive Huntington Central Park. While there may be no "set-in concrete" Master Plan for the park, the passive character of the existing development in the vicinity of this proposal, and the close proximity to residential development would be incompatible with the intense use proposed. 2 . The major concerns expressed in the original proposals for Central Park provided the direction and money voted by the residents for the outstanding park program that Huntington Beach now has. Most residents still support these concerns , as noted in the attached copy from the 1970 Huntington Beach Central Park Report by Eckbo, Dean, Austin and Williams. A high-use active skateboard park within Central Park, especially . in the middle, violates the majority of 'these concerns. 3. The specific site proposed for the skateboard park is the prime location for seeing and sensing the rolling terrain in the western portion of the park, with the large expanse of open space providing psychic relief, and encouraging passive and unstructured activities. The extensive development proposed with its high activity is contrary to the passive atmosphere, and would essentially bisect the existing natural sections; it would also virtually cut off the nature center from the open space needed for survival of many of its inhabitants. For the above reasons, the Environmental Council strongly recommends that this project NOT be approved for development in the middle of Central Park. rF� a Alternatives : The Environmental Council members are not opposed to a skateboard park in Huntington Beach, but we are opposed to the location of this large active facility. The adverse impacts as delineated in the EIR and the comments in review on the nearby residents and others in the community, and on the Nature Center by the traffic of various sorts, noise, lighting, parking, drainage, etc. would be less in alternate locations. There is much undeveloped rolling terrain left in Huntington Beach that would be much more appropriate for this intense activity. If development of this facility is deemed advisable on city property, there are again numerous locations .on the perimeter of the park that have rolling terrain. Mitigating Measures: If it is finally decided to construct this highly active commercial project next to the Shipley Nature Center as proposed, mitigation measures must be carefully considered to reduce the adverse environmental impacts , and conditions applied prior to approval of development. 1. The noise of skateboarding itself and even of large numbers of young people might be tolerable, but ANY kind of noise amplification for constant music as proposed, and for anything but real emergencies would be more than annoying and distracting for the residents and any potential park users including wildlife. A recommended condition is that sound amplification will not be used if noise levels exceed 60 dBA 50 feet beyond the perimeter of the project. Also, it is recommended that a metal wall that was suggested along the western perimter to attenuate the sound not be used, as it could be source of increased sound if balls or rocks were thrown against it. (Use another material. ) 2 . Drainage from this area is already a problem in the park, with one path having been washed out twice. As practically the entire area is :proposed for asphalt and paved skateboard use, runoff would be greatly increased and must not create a problem for the city. A mitigation measure would be requiring proper . drains on his property and the small drains necessary to carry the water to the appropriate disposal area. Fertilizers must be controlled so that additional pollutants are not added to the lake or other disposalarea. 3. It is anticipated that most skateboard park users would arrive by skateboard, bicycle, moped, or on foot. A condition highly recommended is that the design include safe on-site adequate paths or corridors from all project perimeters , especially Goldenwest and Talbert, to the skateboard park entrance for these modes of transportation. Other unanswered questions : 1 . What is the full economic picture of city costs and city benefits of other large skateboard parks? Chief Robitaille ' s letter raises some serious questions . 2. What guarantee is there that there are sufficient people in the vicinity that would support this project to the extent proposed in the Economics section of the EIR? 3 . If the skateboard craze dies , as so many fads (like trampolines) do, is this really a good long-term use of prime park land? 4 . What will be the effect on the assessed value of the present nice homes around the perimeter of this major natural park that changes to a large youtYr-oriented commercial project with accompanying traffic, noise, and increased potential of vandalism in the homes? Re ectfully subm �ittted,;--7, 7Gf.4Z%�c-.� Irwin Haydo�ck; Chadian. : Environmental Council IHfs cc: Recreation and Parks Commission Planning Commission liaison, Ruth Finley Walter Johnson, Library May 15, 1978 HUNTINGTON BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RESOLUTION NO. 1978-2 Skateboard Park in City Central Park WHE REAS: Installation of a skateboard park in the City of Huntington Beach Central Park would be incompatible with the area; and WHEREAS, Capital expenditures of taxpayer funds, estimated at $150,000. to accomodate the installation with off ramps from adjoining streets, signaliza- tion at Goldenwest and Talbert Streets and other installations are not justified by questionable profit returns to the city; and WHEREAS, the protective insurance required of the operator would , in case of cancellation due to first serious accident, fall as a burden onto the city; if the park should still be in operation by the city; and WHEREAS, in our opinion, the city, in its position of custodial stewardship of public owned property and taxpayers funds , should not be in such a hazadardous business , especially in park so dedicated to passive , people-oriented usage, and WHEREAS, Traffic and parking of cars so generated, would destroy the residential peace and harmony--not to mention the noise from enthusiastic sports crowds, estimated at 2,500 to 3 ,000, cheering the competing contestants, NOW THEREFORE, we the Board of Directors of the Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce do hereby strongly recommend against the installation of a skateboard park on city land at central park. For the Board of Directors, �'ki hack Feehan, Presi dent Passed and adopted this 15 day of May, 1978 - u. �`+ AGENDA ADMINISTRATIVIi ITIiMS (MAY 15 , 1078) ITEMS RELATING TO CA 5/12/78 1 . Southern California Edison Company ' s Proposed Combined . Cycle Power Plant - Item #2 2. Suggested Budget Hearing Dates - Item #3 0 City Council Adopted Goals - Item #6 4 . Human Resources Council Request - Item #8 S[ S. World Life Saving Association Nomination - Item #13 6. Agenda Items M-4 through M-6 - item #14 3��•• X 7 . Huntington Beach Public Dock and Pump-Out Facility - Item #15 x 8 . Repair of Piling at Municipal Piar - Item # 1R 9. Outstanding Items - Warner/Goldenwest Redevelopment Project - Item #20 )( 10. Steverson Brothers Rotary Mud Dump Report - Item # 22 11 . Rancho View Pedestrian Bridge - Item #25 ITEMS TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCIL, 1 . Heliport Lease (executed per Gail Mutton' s changes) 2 . Memorandum from Ed Selich Regarding Public Informational Hearing on Edison Notice of Intention May 12 , 1978 3. }Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce Resolution on Skateboiird Park in Central City Park REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by Edward D. Selich, Director Planning y Department .� Date Prepared May 4 , 19 788 Backup Material Attached Yes Q No Subject . EIR 77-12 (Olympic Skateboard Park) 1 City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended. kin e 1 9� Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: / The City Council is considering a sublease`agreement for establishment of a skateboard park in Huntington Central Park. Prior to action on that agreement, an Environmental Impact Report must be reviewed and certified. RECOMMENDED ACTION: The staff recommends that the City Council certify Final EIR 77-12 as being complete and in conformance with the City of Huntington Beach environmental procedures and CEQA Guidelines. ANALYSIS: Environmental Impact Report No. 77-12 was sent to the City Council on April 28 for review and consideration. The EIR assesses the potential envir- onmental effects of a proposed skateboard park consisting of beginning, intermediate, and advanced courses , a pro shop, seating capacity for 2,000 people, and parking on a 12-acre site to be leased from the City in Hunting- ton Central Park. The EIR has been prepared and distributed for public review and comment in accordance with the City' s environmental procedures and the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. This Environmental Impact Report is an informational document prepared for the purpose of informing the City Council and the general public of the potential environmental effects resulting from construction of the proposed skateboard park. The EIR was prepared by the environmental consulting firm of Envista under the direction of the Planning Department. Plo 3/78 or EIR 77-12 May 4, 1978 Page 2 A draft EIR was distributed to governmental agencies and interested members of the general public during a 30-day review period to solicit comments regarding the project. As required in the City' s environmental procedures, a public hearing was held by the Planning Department at the conclusion of the review period to invite further comments regarding the environmental effects of the project. The final EIR consists of the draft EIR, written and verbal comments received during the public review period and at the Planning Department' s public hearing, and the City' s response to the comments received. The EIR identifies unavoidable impacts which cannot be totally eliminated through mitigation measures in the areas of traffic generation, increased air pollution, increased storm water runoff, increased energy consumption, and increased demand for public services and facilities. FUNDING SOURCE: Preparation of the Environmental Impact Report was financed by the Recreation and Parks Department. Total cost of the document was $7, 900. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: According to the City's environmental procedures, the alternative actions that can be taken by the City Council regarding the EIR are as follows: 1. Modify the EIR either directly or through Staff to incorporate new information regarding the environmental effects of the project. After modifications are made the Council should certify the EIR. 2. If the project is approved allowing occurrence of significant effects identified in the Final EIR without mitigation, the City Council should state in writing the reasons to support its action in accord- ance with Section 15089 of the CEQA Guidelines. Respectfully submitted, -ward D. Selich Planning Director EDS:JB:df Published Huntington Beach News, April 27, 1978. LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SKATEBOARD PARK i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Pub- lic Hearing will be held by the City Council of the Cfty of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of review and certification of EIR 77-12 and considera- tion of a proposal relating to the con- struction of a Skateboard Park to be located on the west side of Goldenwest Street at Talbert Avenue in Huntington Central Park. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7:30 p.m, on May 15, 1978 in the Council Chambers Building of the Hunt- ington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street ,Huntington Beach, California. All Interested persons are Invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions regardng this matter. For further information regarding the Environmental Impact Report contact the City Department of Planning and Environmental Resources, 536-5270. For further information regarding specifics of the project contact the City Department of Recreation, Parks and Human Services, 536-5486. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk I Affidavit of Publication State of California County of Orange ss City of Huntington Beach George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been established, printed and published in the State of California, and County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication �a ����; ,� of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not Publisheed,Huntington Beach News; April. devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any 27 1978•. y _; 4 particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or LEGAL ,No�iCE, , 8n number thereof. NOTICE OF'rPUBLI HEARING Y SKATEBOARD PARK The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that,a:Pul of general circulation b Jude G. K. Scovel in the Su lic Hearing will lie�`,held�:,byy -' city: g y g Superior Court of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. Council of the City of Huntington Beach. California,.for the .,purpose,of reviewzan66, certification,of EIR J712".and:�.consiiiera+ tide of a proposal .relating fa the cons That the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING j structio" ' a. skateboard Park^- tie_i ! located on the west side of Goldenwest;' SKATEBOARD PARK I Street,-at Talbert 'Avenue in Huntin'gton 4l Central.Park. of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published.in said news- Said hearing•will be field at the'hour' of 7:30-p.m. on- May'15, 1§79: e Council Chambers Building+pf the,liun"t One issue B ue ington*;Beach-•Civic Center`,-2000"M'ain, paper at least Street!,Huntington Beach,"California" :'All interested-persons are invited "to' eomme.ndn from the 27th day of April attend: said 'hearing and express-thei�K. g Y opinions-regardngNthis "matter. ; I : For further,dnforwation -regarding;the , Environmental Impact- Report `contact- 1973 , and ending on the � day of April the City .Department of Planning 4 6-0 Environmental- •Resources;'^536-5270. For further dnformation regarding 197 both days inclusive, and as often during said period and spegOiics of the project contact•theratyrl times'of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the Department oe Recreation;. Parks= and regular and entire issue of said pews a er Human Services,., U ING V' p p proper, and not ill 8 CITY OF HUNTINGTON�BEACH"` supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following I Alicia- M..Wentworth dates, to-wit: City Clerk A- r. 27, 1978 Publisher /S�ribed and sworn to before me this 28th day of J / ril ` Notary Public Orange County, California =-CALIFORNIA SEAL NKETT m NALIFORNIANTYAR 28, 1981 412 Olive Ave.,.Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i City of Huntington Beach County of Orange State of California ,,4f fidavitof Publication of GEORGE FARQUHAR Publisher Huntington Beach News Filed Clerk BY Deputy Clerk Publish: April Z7, 1978 Postage Paid Post Cards - 800 LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of review and certification of EIR 77-12 and consideration of a proposal relating to the construction of a Skateboard Park to be located on the west side of Goldenwest Street at Talbert Avenue in Huntington Central Park. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 30 p.m. on May 15 , 1978 in the Council Chambers Building of the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions regarding this matter. For further information regarding the Environmental Impact Report contact the City Department of Planning and Environmental Resources, 536-5270. For further information regarding specifics of the project contact the City Department of Recreation, Parks and Human Services, 536-5486. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ALICIA M. WENTWORTH CITY CLERK 165-021-24s 165-02.1-36s 165-022-09s J BlI infield, John F Musselmann, Kenneth G Kucker, Jercme 6821,Crista Palma,Dr 6802 Crista Palma Dr 6782 Via Angelina Dr' . Huntington Reach,;:CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647. . 165-021-25s Parks, Melvin 165-021-37s 165-022-10s 6801 Crista Palma Dr Slater Development Co Janeski, Jerry J etal ..Huntington Beach, CA 92647. 4463 Birch St 6762 Via Angelina Dr Newport Beach, CA 92660 Huntington Beach, CA 926,17 165-021-26s Takido, Arthur S 165-022-01s. 165-022-lls „6791 Crista Palma Dr Elmore, James L French, Ronald L Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6872 Via Ancglina Dr 6752 Via Angelina Dr I Huntington BEach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 926/ 165-021-27s Rubbelke, Miles A 165-022-02s 165-022-12s `6781 Crista Palma Dr Wyman, Stephen M Kimmel, Glenn W Huntington.Beach, :CA 92647 6862 Via Angelina Dr 6732 Via Angelina Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92 '7 165-021-28s 165-022-03s 165-022-13s Kaililaau, Henry H Jr Kubecka, Ronald J Huber, Robert J .6761 Crista Palma Dr 6852 Via Angelina Dr 6731 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92.647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Reach, CA 92rais 4�1 165-021-29s 165-022-04s 165-022-14s ' Anderson, David L Gonzalez, Esteban G Dunleavy, James J I` J 6751 Crista Palma Dr 6842 Via Angelina Dr 804-B Village Dr ;Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Newport ARK 72112 165-021030s 165-022-05s Gccnez, Pablo D Massas, George 165-022-15s %M Systems Attn F. Meyers 6832 Via Angelina Dr Chisholm, Charles G 3rd n,jj Bldg M4-236?_ Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6761 Vista Del Sol Dr I Redondo Beach, CA 902798 Huntington Beach, CA 92.647 ..165-021-31s 165-022-06s 165-022-16s Williams, Rayford W Haddad, Elias W Schreiman, Jack TT 6711 Crista Palma Dr 6812 Via Angelina Or 6781 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92.647 Huntington Beach, CA 9264.7 165-021-33s 165-022-07s 165-022-17s ' Severin, Reed Boogar, E Robert Law, Roberta J 6801 Via Anglina Dr 6802 Via Angelina Dr 6791 Vista Del Sol Dr .Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Iiuntington Beach, CA 92647 Iuntington Beach, CA 92647 165-021-35s 165-022-08s 165-022-18s Evans, Mary A Dept of Vets Affaris St of CA Kopcha, Douglas B 6791 Via Angelina Dr Kirksey, Robert S 6801 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6792 Via Angelina Dr Huntington Deach, CA 92647 TTr7rti nrTt-m Reach, CA 9254R i 159-022-37s 165-021-01s 165-021-13s Poist, Bruce D Guarascio, Charles R GenAt, Donald K .� 18102 Westlake Cis 17511 Via Espana In 6751 Via .Angelina Dr 'Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647' Huntington Beach, CA 92647 -'�' 159-022-38s 165-021-02.s De sey, John J Cramer, Pearl 165-021-14s . .. 18092 Westlake Cir 13304 Rochenback Schoenberger, Max D :,`%Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Baldwin Park, CA 91706 17521 Via Espana Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 p '-'-159-022-39s 165-021-03s 165-021-15s Mi.arenza, John A Laros, James G Foss, Karl M ' 18082 Westlake Cir 17531 Via Espana Ln 6732 Crista Palma Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntingtcai Beach, CA 92.647 Huntington Beach, CA 926/ u 159-022-40s 165-021-04s 165-021-16s Mac Lean, Buchanan J Maranian, Paul R Martinez, Arthur 18072 Westlake Cir 17541 Via Espana Ln' P• 0. Boat 15025 Huntington.Beach, CA 92648 Hun Santa Ana, CA 92705 Huntington CA 92647 i . 159-022-41s 165-021-05s 165-021-17s Wells, Gordon L Morimoto, Benjamin M Levesque, Joseph R 18062 Westlake Cir 6851 Via Angelina Dr 6772 Crista Palma Dr ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntingtn Beach, CA 92647 i 159-022-42s 165-021-06s 165-021-18s I Cicero, Patricia Flanar, Cecil J Hayes, James `�✓ 18052 Westlake Cir 202 hospital Cir 6782 Crista Palma Dr ' Iutington Beach, CA 92648 Westminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 159-022-43s 165-021-07s 165-021-19s Underwood, Warren Preszler, Lehard P Carcerano, Lorraine V .' 18042 Westlake Cir 6831 Via Angelina Dr 6792 Crista Palma Dr \� J .Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92G47 159-022-44s 165-021-08s . 165-021-2Fr 21s = Hurd, Mark S Hall, William F Milam, George W 16032 Westlake Cir 6811 Via Angelina Dr 6822 Crista Palma Dr .::Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 159-022-45s 165-021-� .11s 165-021-S�s ?.2s Lovelace, Thomas Irwin, Bernard C Crandall, Richard N 6781 Via Angelina Dr 6832 Crista Pa-lma Dr 18022 Westlake Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 `I Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i W. 159-022-46s 165-021-12s 165-021-23s Sutherland, Barry F Kuehnl, Robert A Eisele, Lawrence D Jr 18012.Westlake Cir �S 2 Coastguard Tr Ctr 6831 Crista Palma Dr Yorktown. VA 23690 fluntingtcm Reach, CA 92648 f?»nt;_�,ntcm rT'?^�,. �r. ^�.= -• :1 159-022-07s 159-022-17s 159-022-27s �'Williams, Robert J IIurkenfield, Michael C Miner, Bonnie L ,,:._ 6191 Lakeview Dr 18031 Upperlake Cir 1732 Mt. Marty Dr. I13111ut,..CA 917.89 .` Huntington Beach, CA 92646. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 159-022-08s 159-022-18s 159-022-28s i Craig, Frank M Boozan, M Robert IIjelmstrom, Gordon F ' 18022 Shoreview Cir 6202 Point Loma Dr 1-8041 Upper Lake Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i .�' 159-022-09s 159-022-M9s 159-022-29s' cc Edwin E O .Day, Michael E Tobin, Harold E 18 1 Shoreview Cir 18072 Upperlake Cir 5142 Warner Ave Hurtingtcn Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 15"22-10s 159-022-20s 159-022-30s -i.: Perrier, Richard J Miller, Dennis D Colona, Arthur N 18 Shoreview Cir 8614 Bluebird Ave 18061 Upperkake Cir I-IU gton Beach, CA 92648 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 15 22-11s 159-022-21s 159-022-31s V olt, Karl A Long, Hayden E Duncan, Bernard 18021 Shoreview Cir 18052 Upperlake Cir 6561 Lakeview Dr HF41 gton Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 12-12s 159-022-22s 159-022-32s y, Robert L Camzth, Vance Forrest, Patrick L 1Shoreview Cir 18843 San Felipe St 18081 Upper Lake Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Huntington Peach, CA 92648 15 2-13s 159-022-23s 159-02.2-33s James E Slater-Ruiz Company Beaulieu, Celis C 180 Shoreview Cir 12742 Knott Ave � .,'.Hun gton 1$731 rforongo St Beach, CA 92648 Garden Grove, CA 92645 Fountain Valley, CA 927C-3" 159-022-14s 159-022-24s 159-022-34s Nimmons, Robert K Sungherz, Jovand Duncan, Bernard + ' ,.18061 Shoreview Cir 18012 Upperlake Cir 6561 Lakeview Dr • r -Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 3 a a 159-022-15s 159-022-25s 159-022-35s Smith, Daryl D Smith, Wayne M Dureau, ALbe-rt ' 6611 Lakeview Dr 18011 Upperlake Cir 8282'., Crane Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Funtington Beach, CA 92648 159-022-16s 159-022-26s 159-022-36s Dept of Vet Affairs St of CA Harris, Floyd 1-7Boozan, Michael R I Tang, Eugene P 18021 Upperlake Cir 18112 Westlake 6601 Lakeview Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r. TlTltlnc7t'O`1 I?P_1rb, r-A 9?F443 r. 159-011-33s 159-011-42s Green, Alice 159-011-52s ]3 ICen , Marian V 18111 Freshwater Cir ne y Gerrity, Philip A Huntington Beach, CA 92648 18032 Clearwater Cir 18081 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach,. CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 .159-011-34s 159-011-43s 159011-53s .:Nygard, Glenn S Williams, Paul A Godfrey, Charles A Jr 18112 Clearwater Cir 18022 Clearwater Cir 18091 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 :159-011-35s 159-011-44s 159-01 -54s Stevens, Richard R Carroll, Paul A Irvin, Stanley R s 18102 Clearwater Cir 18012 Clearwater Car 18101 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Iuntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92, 8 159-011-36s 159-011-45s 159-011-55s Bush, K Dale Stenzel, G. Robert Hill, Robert J n 1220 Main St 18011. Clearwater Car 18111 Clearwater Cir I� Huntington Beach,. CA 92648. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 926 159-011-37s 159-011-46s i ' -' Kearn, Edward L Jr Rouchleau, Asele 159-022-01s _ .. 18082 Clearwater Cir 18021 Clearwater Cri Arivaskul, Chaweewan Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 18011 Cliffview In Huntington Beach, CA 9 6 159-011-38s 159-022-02s Llewellyn, Lawrence G 159-011-47s iwamoto, Masaru � ;18072 Clearwater Cis Farndsen, Richard 18021 Cliffview Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P. O. Box 2386 Huntington Beach, CA 92E48 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 �1^ 159-011-39s 159-022-03s Moroch, Michael S 159-011-48s Hanning, Patricia M 18062 Clearwater Ln Deak, Garf F 18031 Cliffview Ln . Huntington Beach, CA 92648 18041 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach, CA 9^C48 Huntignton Beach, CA 92648 . 159-011-40s 159-022-04s Mprgan, Miranda L 159-011-49s Gappert, Arthur R i . 18052 Clearwater Cir Ramos, Alector C 18051 Cliffview Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92648 18051 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92E48 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 159-011-41s 159-022-05s y Berger, David F 159-011-50s Page, John T i ...18071 Upperlake Cir Abadie, Carl G 18062 Shoreview Cir Jfuntington Beach, CA 92648 18061 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 5 '• , l j 159-011-42s 159-011-51s 159-022-06s Kenney, Marian V Short, James J Jr Tierney, James D 32 lep water 18071 Clearwater Cir 18052 Shoreview Cir HI ;� ` Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Iuntington Beach, CA 9 6-48 f . . 110-185-21s 159-072-07s 43s Gustafson, John Munro, Larry G . 5161 Pearce Dr 6362 Plewbury Dr Huntington Beach 92649 Huntington Lieacii, CA 92547 Glendale '. 110-185-09s 110-185-22s 159-072-08s Armstrong, Mrs. .Frank etal Sasman, William G etal Arakaki, Herbert S Mrs. G A 17281' Beach Blvd 6372 Newbury Dr . 814 Portola Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Glendale,. CA.91206 110-185-1Os 110-185-23s 159-072-09s Glazier, Boyd D Fitzgerald, Philip K Cox, Michael A : 1395 E Orange Grove Blvd 7941-C Ronald Rd 6371 Glenfox :Dr Pasadena, CA 91104. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-185-11s - 1590071-11s 159-072-10s, D. afiiW, Grace Dept of Vet Affairs St of CA Mengelberg, W Robert ; Michael D Nolan, Ronald L 6361 Glenfox Dr 63 �E. Orange Grove Ave 6331 Newbury Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Madre, CA 91024 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 5-14s 159-071-12s 159-072-11s Bead, A J Finken, Thanas L liagey, Dale B Mr r a H Paar 6341 Newbury Dr 6351 Glenfox Dr 19 Award Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 926,17 le Park, New Jersey 07662 11 5-15s 159-01-13s 159-072-12s i ight, Ray etal Schwing, Robert G Cowie, Brian C . 1800 N Spurgeon St 6351 Newbury Dr 6341 Glenfox Dr . Ana, CA 92706 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 926,17 11 185-16s 159-01-14s 159-072-13s tor, George MacArthur, Dennis A Niedringhause, Daniel A A• 31 33rd St 6361 Newbury Dr 6331 Glenfox Dr Newport Beach, CA 92660 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntir �n Beach, CA 92547 1.1 85-17s 159-072-04s 159-074-01s Christ Reider, Robert V Bunten, Charles 1-1 ..401 leveland Av 6332 Newbury Dr 18132 Wellbrook Cir :. Non lo, CA 90640 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92:547 " 1.10-185-18s 159072-05s 159-074-02s 0ozart, Hattie A Yeo, Gertrude W Bacon, Thomas M -Mitchell, Hattie M 6342 Newbury Dr 18112 Wellbrook Cir Box 2428 Meadview Rt Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ' Dolan Springs, Ariz 86441 f = ll0-185-20s 159-072-06s 159-074-03s E ,Gallagher, Stephen F etal Chivers, Curtis J west Frank S -Arnold, A E P.0 6352 Newbury Dr 18102 Wellbrook Cis "P.O. Box 370 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 926�E7 -.Cypress, CA 90630 �J } a 110-161-14s . 110-181-02s 110-183-06s , 1,,Elmer E Mlitson, James 11 Jr etal Mar, Robert W 524 S. 9th East 15683 Starbuck St 1224 S. Kathy Ln Salt Lake City, Lftah 94102 Trfi=.t'_izr, C21 90603 Santa Ana, CA 92704 110-161-19s 110-131-04s 110-183-07s 8, 9 Whiteeotton, J W N etal McKenzie, Charles P etal Eaton, Avery C etal y L P. 0. Box 477 17524 Santa Paula Cis ` 21562 Arms Ln Sun City,CA 92381 Fountain Valley, CA 92708.1.. ' ..Laguna .Beach, CA 92651 .110-161-21 110-181-05s 110-183-15s ' Bank of Amer. Keller, Melvin F Flein; Appolonia Tr Lieb = Joe 4534 SW Hewett Blvd 24921 Muirlands Blvd Ul E. Chartres St Portland 1, Oregon 97221 Space 154 Anaheim,.. CA 92805 E1 Toro, CA 92630 .:110162-03s 4,7,8 110-181-07s 110-183-16s - . Keller. Frank R Burton, HC Eaton, Avery C etal 16801 Blanton St 780 E 5th South 17524 Santa Paula Cir Hntington Beach, CA 92649 Bountiful, Utah 84010 Fountain Valley, CA 9270p -181-08s 110-183-19s 110-162-05s 110 Bailey, W R Mills, Jeannette C etal Maag, James R 4060 Chapman Pl Iawell, Elizabeth C.,'.. . 2260 Park Newport Dr #103 Riverside, CA 92506 551 GalaxyNewport Beach, CA 92660 '] Vista, CA 92083 'i~� IL 110-162-06s 110-181-09s 110-183-20s Petty, Wm H Hahn, C J . Bailey,_W R etal 3502 Don Carlos Dr 4060 ChaFinan P1 Petty, Charles Ft 858 W. Foothill Blvd Carlsbad, CA 92008 Riverside, CA 92506 Monrovia, CA 91016 i 110-183-23s 110-162-1Os 110-181-1Os Holmes Helen etal Gentry, Evangeline 11 W .Hanron, Barbara S ' Box 202 Frick, Myra B S70 ICenwood Dr Taos, New Mexico 87571 6108 Cliff Dr Menlo Park, CA 94025 Paradise, CA 95969 110-162-12s 110-181-11s 110-185-01s Hyde, William A Church, Lion E Lutherans Max �.._. Cook, Maurine H UAC Box 942 5066 E. Cooper St Argonia, Kansas 67004 Glove, Ariz 85501 Tucson, Ariz 85711 '_" 110-170-10s 110-181-12s 110-185-03s H&Uton, Donald etal Norman, Ralph etal Plunkett, James D P. 0.- Box 698 Nolian„Theodore 11232 Hunting Horn Dr Wilmington, CA 90748 451 Westmount Dr Santa Ana CA 92705 Los Angeles, CA 90048 1110-181-01s " 110-183=03s 110-185-06s 1.Benge, Clyde L Jr etal Wasson, Myron M. Tr etal Cartwright, Ray etal 16252 Woodstock Ln 23636 Sidney Bay St 1800 N. Spurgeon St Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Lagnuna Niguel, CA 92677 Santa Ana, CA 92706 �"110-476-09s 110-477-01s William W Donovan, Laura L 110-014-48s 90 `Wright' ... 069 La Crescenta Ave 17752 San Leandro Ln Signal Bosa Corp Fountain VAlley, CA 92708 Iuntington Beach, CA 92647 178�0 S]cX Park Cir Irvine. cA 92.707 >110-4 7 6-10 s 110-477-02s 1'YO-=t51-12,13s .Barney, Donald :W Jr. ROss, Jerry W CITY OP 11MITLNGTON BEACH 117841 San Leandro Ln 17762 San Leandro Ln 'Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-161-03s4 ll0-160-02 110-476-11s 110-477-03s 110-161-01s ;!?Anderson, William M Davis, Leonard J Lichtenhan, Garnet 17831 San Leandro Ln 17772 San Leandro Ln 3529 Cerritos Ave ;Hunt ngton'Beach,::• 2647.q' Huntington Beach, CA.92647;- Long Beach, CA 90807_ . CA9 110-476-its'-" 110-477-04s 110-161-02s Pbark, Charles B I1aas, Randal J etal Forst, Bernard 17821 San Lezndro Ln 17782 San .Leandro In 408 S. Spring St Rra 917 Huntinyton Beach, CA 92647 h`untington Beach, CA 92647 Los Angeles, CA 90013 110-476-13s 110-477-05s 110-161-05s Sigler, Roobett G. `Jr ' : Smith, Glenn P 2.4arow, Milton H etal 17811 San Leandro Ln 17792 San Leandro Ln 272 S. Rexford Dr 'jimtington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 110-476-14s 110-477--06s 110-161-07s ,`. Headley, Stephen G Levine, Joel M bank, Union & Tr Co of LA 17791 San Leandro Ln 17812 San.Leandro Ln TR#P1752 & TR#P7022 Huntington..Beach, CA.82647 , Huntington Beach, CA 92647 P. 0. Box 2193 Term Annex :1• ,:: , Las Angeles, CA 90054 110-476-15s 110-477-07s' 110-161-10s Geer, ��dg%,. Plachta, Theodore Ward, Joseph S 1512 Ln 17822 San Leandro Ln 17771 Crestmoor Ln ;`.Wheaton, MD 20902 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 '']10=476-16s 110-477-08s 110-161-11s ':'Liunsdaine, Charles J Carnival, Jeffrey A Alli.ngton, Walter FI '-. 17771 San Leandro Ln 17832 San Leandro Ln 2621 Valley View Ave 111-buntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Salt Lake City, Utah 84117 I•: 110-476-17s 110-161-12s McGarfill, Mark Marow, Milton ii etal + � "'�$521 Ostrich Cir 272 S. Rexford Dr `• 'Fbuntai.n;Valley, CA 92708 Beverly Hills, CA 9021.2 110-476-18s 110-161-13s Lewandowski, Allan A 110-477-09s Mjtbnan, Albert 0 etas_ 17751 San Leandro Ln Sanders, Irving 6 %Loyal, Grace ` Huntington Beach, CA 92647 17842 San Leandro Ln 107 Prince Ln :, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Santa Ana, CA 92704 P' 110-474-fis 110-475-08s 110-475-18s Etherton, William U Combs, Rex L Vernand, Ricl�rd E < 17771 San Doval Ln 13832 San Doval Ln 17761 Quintana Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-474;-1�7s 110-475-09s 110-475-19s Reeves, Janice A Cotton, Donald P Rapchun, Cornelius 17761 San Doval Ln 17481 Bellport Cir 17751 Quintana Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA"92649 -Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ';110-474-18s 110-475-10s 110-476-01s Daley, Michael J Hawkes, James M Fivars, Mark E T_17751 San Doval Ln 17841 Quintana Ln 17752 Quintana Ln , Huntrngtowpeaach, CA,92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, .CA 92647 ' '�;!1110-475-01s 110-475-11s 110-476-02s I3arazsu, David P Rhinehart, Rodger W Kleckner, Duane J :17752 San Doval Ln 17831 Quintana Ln 17762 Quintana Ln . ;Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-475-02s -110-475-12s 110-476-03s Sutliff Curtis D 17762 San Doval Ln Smith, Richard D : ; . Backer,,. Thomas J ,". 17821 Quintana Ln 17772 Quintana In Y''Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 b 110-475-03s 110-475-13s 110-476-04s "Van Der Upwich, Herman Donato, Cathy T Killmeyer, Donald H ' 17772 San Doval Ln 17811 Quintana Ln 17782 Quintana Ln h`umtington Beach, CA 92647 htington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 �L .]10-475-04s 110-475-14s 110-476-05s T'Berardini, Michael A Mason, James E Morris, Jeffrey A 8111 Westminster Ave 17782 San Doval Ln:y,, I•Iuntington,Beach, CA 92647 Westminster, CA 92683 17792 Quintana Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ,y v. 110-475-05s 110-475-15s ibudiine, Paul L 110-476-06s Doane, Kenneth h Gillespie, Clifford W ' 17792 San Doval Ln 17791 Quintana Ln ' fIuntin Beach, CA 92647 17812 Quintana Ln Huntington .Beach, CA 92647 � " Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-475-06s 110-475-16s ` 110-476-07s ! McDonald, Russell G Chouu�pff, Alfred J :. ' 17812 San Doval Ian Livingston, Ian 17781 Quintana Ln 17341 Notre Dame St luntington-Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Westminster, CA 92693 110-475-07s 110-476-17s 110-476-08s Jones, Richard A Nash, Lawrence V Sandusky, I2okrt L Jr. ._: .., 17822 San Doval Ln 17771 Quintana Ln 17832 Quintana Ln ; . Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 r 110-473-005s 110-473-15s 110-474-06s Shipley, 'Marshall S Shorb, .Ray E Berman, flax 17792 Altamirano Ln 17791 Carranza l,n 3908 Bolsa Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Wstminster, CA 92683 # . 110-473-06s 110-473-016s 110-474-07s . Soos,' Rnbert C Thornton, Sidney D Maguire, Thams G etal 17802 Altamirano Ln 17781 Carranza L11 . 17822 Carranza Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 3 f `110-473-07s 110=473-17s 110-474-08s Ingram, David L Hill, Paul D Dziurawiec, Edward J 17812 Altamirano Ln 17771 Carranza Ln 17962 Scotia Cir Hunti.ngton:Beach, CA 92647:.::` ' Huntington,Beach, CA 92647. Huntington Beach, CA, 92647. 110'473-08s 110-473-18s 110-474-09s Wages, Jaines T Fleming, Donald A Katsanp;s, Ernest T 17822 Altamirano Ln 17761 Carranza Ln 17842 Carranza Ln Huntington Beach,, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647. 110-473-09s 110-473-019s 110-474-010s Ota,`James B .- Weaver, James R Kempster, Barbara P 17832 Altamirano Ln 17751 Carranza Ln -17891 San`Doval Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-473-010s 110-474-01s 110-474-lls Johnson, Charels E Konowal, James M Slinker, George D 17842 Altamirano Ln 17752 Carranza Ln 17831 San Doval In Huntington Beach, CA 92647',-. Huntington Beach, ,CA 92647.'.,- Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-473-Oils 110-474-02s 110-474-12s Morr, Harold F Kopf, Herbert Cunningham, Paul D ,17081 Beach Blvd 17762 Carranza Ln 17821 San Doval Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-473-012s 110-474-03s 110-474-13s Ball, Kenneth A Yoneyama, Craig T Halley, Robert D . 17831 Carranza Ln 17772 Carranza.Ln 17811 San Doval Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-473-13s 110-474-04s 110-474-14s Lyons, William G -gab, Ronald.J Weiland, Jerry D 17821 Carranza Ln 17782 Carranza Ln 17791 San Doval Ln Huntington,Beach, Ck.92647 Huntington"Beach, CA 92647, Hutnington Beach, CA 92647 "110-473-14s 110-474-05s 110-474-15s -:Duncan, Robert K Brun ett, Charles C Uhden, Roger D 17811 Carranza Ln 17792 Carranza Ln 17781 San Doval Ln Huttiggton Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 T . 110-4165-05s tiPedig0, Jerry 1 110-465-15s 110-472-01s -, 6652 Luciento Dr Owens, Robert A Sr Wersching, Wendel R Huntington Beach, CA 92647 17912 San Leandro Ln 17781 Altamirano Ln I-huitington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 N110-465-06s 110-465-16s 110-472-02s i Grubbs, Leslie ll "Dickerson, Jay B =:Contreras, Max[niliano '' 17902 San Leandro,Ln. ,:8791 Burlcrest Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 17791 Altamirano Ln >>.Huntington Beach, CA 92646 5 Huntington, Beach, CA 92647 f . i. 110-465-07s 110-465-17s 110-472-03s Arrollado, John L Fakouraghai., Hassan Dykstra, Nick Jr =.6672 Lucineto Dr 17892 San Leandro Ln 17811 Alta Mirano Ln Huurtirigbon Beach, CA,926477gton Beach," CA 92647 :.,.' ' Huntington Beach, CA.-92647 r110-465-08s j 110-465-18s 110-472-04s 1 Ueirochea, Brigitte M Gibson, Charles T 'fucker, George W ! ' 6682 buciento Dr 17882 Sari Leandro Ln 17821 Altamiraiw Ln ''.'Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington beach, CA 92647 110-465709s , 110-465-19s 110-472-05s Ad]sins, Ronald L` Digrado, Jim Fisher, 'Gary E 6711 Calpe Cir 514 Alondra Dr 17831 Altami_rano_Ln :.Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huttington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-463-10s 110-465-20s 110-472-06s Henderson, Larry L Ortman, Keuin J Auld, John N -6721 Calpe Cri 17862 San Leadro 17841 Altamarano Ln Huntington Beach, CA .92647. = Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ; .Huntington Beach, CA 92647. i 110-465-011s 110-465-21s 110-473-01s Witt, Robert L Cross, James K Tanner, Jere E j 6731- Calpe Cir 16931 Bolsa Chica St 17752 Altamarano Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 r110-465-12s 110-471-03s 110-473-02s :;Whaling, Joseph T Bousard, Jack P haney, David C 7�6732 Calpe Cir 17751 Altamarino Ln 17762 Altamirano Ln ;"=.Huntington Beach, CA 92647 huntington Beach, .CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92G47• x.h 110-465-13s 110-471-04s 110-473-03s Stevens, Robert L Smith, Terry L Vivion, Kay L 6722 Calpe Cir 17761 Altamarano Ln 17772 Altamirino Huntington Beach...CA 92647 Huntington Beach,. CA 92647 , Huntington Beach, CA 92647 , •�h -,is .j - . .. , :110-465-14s 110-471-05s 110-473-04s ~: Miller, Gary T Douillard, Charles W Ilagan, Alvin .`6712 Calpe Cir 17741 Altami.rano In 17782 Altamiraix) Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 s110-464-02 110-464-11 110-464-20 Dennis Masada Bruce A McAvinen et al Howard L Davis 17t362 Quintana Lane G621 Luciento Drive 17891 San Leandro Lane 'Huntington Beachga tCali.f Huntington Beaciz, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif '.92647.: 92647 92647 110-464-03 110-464-12 110-464-21 'Ronald D Di Laura..' Paul E Baker Donald J Trussell ;y17$72 Quintana Lane 6641 Luciento Drive 17881 San Leandro Lane '-'Huntington Beach Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif- 92647 92647 292647 4.110-464-04 110-464-13 110-464-22 ;Mark'McGargill _ ; . Lucille I Haves Cecil E Webber 8521. Ostrich Circle 109 Via Eboli r 17881 San.LeaiZdronLane :.Fonntain Valley, Calif Newport Beach,' `Calif' ,. Huntington °Beach,:.Calif. < 92108` 92664 92647- . :•.110-464-.05 110-464-14 110-464-23 Dennis D Lambert Ronald J Gilbert Claus W Sass 6672 Soria Circle 6661 Luciento Drive 17861 San Leandro Lane ='w'Huntirigton Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach,' Calif 92647 92647 �. ,110-464-06 110-464-15 110-464=24 Vincent J Rangel ;'' Willa am H Smaw Harry.Rieff Jr =6681 Soria Circle 6671 Luciento Drive 17851 San Leandro Lane u Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92647 92647 110-464-07 110-464-16 Jack R Schlotzhauer .. Cezar B Velarde 110-465-01s :: Phan, Toan C etal , _:6671 Soria Circle: 6681 Luciento Drive Huntington Beach, Calif iuntington Beach Calif 6602 Luciento Dr ' ; ':�' 92697 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-464-08 110-464-17 110-465-02s tir: John S Coe Raymond J Seeger Jr Babb, IUchard17892 Quintana Lane 17921 San Leandro Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington beach,c Oalif 6612 Luciento Ur 92647 92647 Huntington Beach, C:A92647 - '""` 110-464-09 110-464-18 7_A5F.: Charles E Stewart. 3rd Richard L Draman 110-465-03s Haruo "- 17912 Quintana 17.911 San Leandro Lane C 622La,Luciento- Dr 6622 Luciento� Dr �;;;,•: Huntingtc n Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, CA92648 92647 92647 . a` 1.10-464-10 110-464-19 17 0-465-04s John E Merrill Howard Grover Bailey, James E 3rd �',:.`17922 Quintana Lane 17901 San Leandro Lane 6642 Luciento Dr t':, ,;•. Funtington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 :f<r: t 110-462-12 1-10-462-21 110-463-07 Curtis D Campbell Frank C Hansen et al Judy Johnson -1.6601 Luciento Drive 17871 Carranza Lane 1169 Catalpa fit,gnton-Bich CalifHuntington Beach, Calif Anaheim, Calif , 92647,,'° 92647 .92801 ; ."110-462=13 110-462-22 110-464-08 - Joseph H Kagel Gerald L Nixon Donald J Petricone ". 6611 Luciento Drive 17861 Carranza Lane 17892 Carranza Drive 1. Huntiggton Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92647 92647 110-462-14 110--"2-23 110-463-09 Doyle E Lockwood Ralph H Haggard _ ' Gary J Tucker ':w 4;{ 6421 Myrtle Drive 17851 Carranza Lane 17896•.Carranza Lane Huntington Beach Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach Calif F ``.92647 92647 92647 110=462-15 110-463-01 110-463-10 Ralph C Culac Iarry R Ray Jorge Valladares et al. �17911 Carranza Lane 17852 San Duval Lane 17891 Quintana Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif' 92647:,,;.; 92647 92647. .. ? , 110-463-02 110-463-11 110-462-16 . . James D Van Gorder Majesta M Hudson IIIaward A Potts 17891 Carranza Lane 6622 Aracena Drive 17881 Quintana Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Call_f' 92647 92647 92647 11,9462-17 110-463-03 110-463-12 •Thcenas W Nelson David L Farrow Timothy J Walker 6572 Colon Circle 6612 Aracena Drive 17871 Quintana Lane Huntington Beach, Calif :Huntington Beach Cal)-f i ,.;• Huntington Beach, •Calif � �gto • :'.92647 92647 92647 • # : 110-462-18 110-463-04 110-463-13 Arnold L Gorske Helmut A Torok Nancy D Allen 4. 6561 Colon C:irlce 6602 Aracena Drive 17861 Quintana Lane v. Fhuitigron Beach, Calif Hun4Calif tington Beach Calif 92647gnton Beach, Ca ss. 92647 ` }110-463-19 110-463-05 110-463-14 Janes W Wollaston Ross P YcZa iel et al James R Bloom 6571 Colon Circle P.O Box 1205 17851 Quintana Lane Huntiggton Beach, Calif Costa Mesa Calif Huntington Beach, Calif =£; 92647 92626 92647 # ]l0-462-20 110-463-06 110-464-01 Glen�E Newlin Jeanne C Cxaig et al Ibnald P Rountree . 17881 Carranza Lane' 17872 Carranza Lane 17852 Quintana Lane ;,."'Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92947 92647 92647 .110-461-01 110-461-10 110-462-03 Robert G Roth Raymond S Wright Horace R Roberts : ..' 17851 Altamirano Lane 6501 Cadiz Circle 17401 Almelo Lane ` Iuntington Beach, ,Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif ;,92647.. : 92647 f 92649 ;lle-461-02 110-461-11 ,110-462-04 Y;. `Jimmy`E Cole Michael Bashaw Adam Bialuslci ` ' 17861 Altamirano Lane 6502 Cadiz Circle 17882 AltaMirano Lane _''Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92647 92647 , : 110-461-03 110-461-12 110-462705 . : .Imnald W Freeman .' ' _James E,Lane . Robert' � Fitzgerald `'f5:17871 Altamirano Lane 6512•Cadiz' Circle 17892;A1taMirano Larie Huntington Beach, Calif _ Huntingtm Beach, Calif Huntington Beach,- Calif �1" 92647 . . 92647 62647 .'".'110-46-1-04 110-461-13 110-462-06 ! Anthony De John Mark Helvey Donald E Nau i °a.,,17881 Altanu.rano Lane 6522 Cadiz Circle 17912 AltaMirano Lane 'Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif. 92647 92647 92647 _ . .,.. 110-461-05 110-461-14 L10 07. . , Thomnas F Joyce Ci-Larles W Johns Robert P Pierson Jr r• 222 W 72nd St Apt 48 6562 Luciento Drive 17922 AltaMirano Lane t <' New Tork, N.Y. Huntington Beach, Calif. Huntington Beach, Calif 10023 92647 92647 110-461-06 110-461-15 110-462-08 Jeno G Jordan . Benny J Messina Mark Spangrud , 17911 Altamirano Lane 6572 Luciento Drive 6561 Luciento Drive Iintington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif "::92647 92647 92647 °110-461-07 110-461-16 110-462-09 -lawrence E Todd Susan C Nemiroff et al Kenneth M Klin g 7921 Altamirano Lane John F L"ynde 6571 Luciento Drive i ,`gfiuntington Beao}, Calif 6582 Luciento Drive Huntington Beach, Calif : -o:;:92647. Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92647 110-461-08 110 462-01 110-462-10 Stephen M White James M Burroughs Raymond E Ward "�6521 Cadiz Circle 17852 AltaMirano Lane' 6581Luci.ento Drive � Iuntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif ,%...,:192647 92647 92647 110-461-09 110-462-02 110-462-11 Ronnie Mixer John P Hilger Laurence A Brown ., :�.6511`Cadiz Circle - 17862 Altamirano Lane 6591 Luciento Drive 4,ftuntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif °92647 . 92647 92647 159-081-13 df_ 159-074--04s 159-081-03s Thurkow, Glenn G etal Charles E. Maples Albert M. Corbett 18092 Wellbrook Cir 18052 Lakepoint Dane 6411 Newbury Drive ' I�untin n Beach, CA 92647 Huntington.Beach, CA 92ff47. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 159-074-05s 159-081-4 df 159-081-14 df Zawistowski, Ronald J David Miller Ray G. Lamoureux, 3rd j' 18082 Wellbrook Cir 6421 Newbury Drive 18062 Laker, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 _ 159-081-05 df 159-081-15 :.df "159-074-06s Lewis, Samuel .S John T. Horton Helen S. Psaros P 0 Box 2101 6431 Newbury Drive 13072 Lakepoint Lane Seal Beach, CA 90740 Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 159-081-06 df 159-081-16 df 159-074-07s Gattuccio, Gary L Frank, Jack S. David T. Lopes 18091 Field bury Ln 6451 Newbury Drive 18082 Lakepoint Lane �. Huntington Beach, _CA 92647 . . Huntington Beach, CA, 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 '159-074-08s 159-081-07 cif 159-081-17 ;df Lunt, Willis R Richard W. Le Grand Harold E. Tobin 18101 Fieldbury Ln 9461 tlexabuzy Drive c/o Tobin Recilty i Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beech, CA 92647 16931 Bolsa Chica Street Huntington Beach, CA 92649 } ti159-074-09s 159-081-08 df 159-081-18 df Walker, Edith C etal Roger D. Wing James E. Campbell, Jr. Vickemdn, William A 6471 Newbury Drive 16102 Lakepmindj Lane i 181U Fieldbury Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92467 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 159-081-09 df 159-082-01 'df. ` 159-074-10s Sutith, Ivan B Edwii R. Gancunq Richard D. Lies i 6481 Newbury Drive 18122 Lakepoint Lane 18121 Fieldbury Ln ' '�hintington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92i7 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 159-174-11s 159-081-10 df 159-082-02 df ' Cassens, Robert J William W. Hawatt Dcminic. C. Chen 18141 Fieldbury Ln 18012 Lakepoint Lane 5355 Duncannon Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Westminster, CA 92683 159-081-11 df 159-082-03 df 159-081-01s Fiddler, Richard J Earleen J. McGregor John F. Lere 6381 Newbury Dr 18022 Lakepoint Lane 18142 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 159-081-12 df_ 159-082-04 df ` 159-081-02s Bennett, Kenneth H M. E. Beall Hugh E. Conkers 6401 Newbury Dr 8831 Adams Avenue 18152 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92643 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 '� trt t;• 1 � -�77 �--�, My- �q '' •`' >. } lt " i '1�.. ,� _- a-: -- .• � -- . -s�C* s x __ •E. t 4 -v 'r , lair F ti A59-0.82 05 df ,E r s ' - 2, �n. 159--083 9 df 159 084 0 x' s sd Gail':files Russell S. 'Bucc ola= _ C.- leury ;18162 Lakepoint Lane V 9471 Glenfox Drive 5 18091°Lakenoint Lane x•'-='7 r� y�.H-ntzn F3each ` CA , 98A647 u , Huntington:Beach, CA w 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 - 5 59 oaa o1 �' df 159-083-10 df 159-084 03: d rak `�wTheron L `,;Haynes C Steven Johnson :~' J1lnthcmy Yturralde 6382 Newbury..-Drive 6461� Glenfox Drive 8581 Dorenere 'Cr. ' TrHuhtington Beach, CA' 92647 t, untingtcm Beach, CA 92647. Hun on Beach,.Vms T. ti,n Bea 46 ( H gt- CA' 926 t ]59-083-02 , df 159-083-11 �, df }-159-084-04 ' �d EC, 'G x. . RQnald Denney t Donald J. Brunet, et al,,; < Earl V `King ` 6402`Newbuuy Drive 6451 Glenfox Drive 18111 Lakepoint Dr Huntington Beach, CA`'" 92647 Huntington Beach, CA , 92647 'Iuntington F3each, CA' 92647 rp.•.,fS'�1 sr - Sj •,.jti r`. rr f159-083-,03; ` df 159-083=12 :x df 153-084 05' d Fo- t t; 4 t, PhillipYM.- Hutcherson i Eilliam J. 'Trounce 1 e i William A:•-Edwards, Jr Tt i_6412 Newbury Lane ­ .6431 Glenfox Drive 18121' Lakepoint:Ln. Fintington. Beach, CA. 92647 : Huntingtc Beach, CA'' 9264V' Huntington .Beach,.. CA 92647 , 7V. 159-083 04.3 , :,J df `_' 159-083-13 df., ,159-084-.06. _ d `;Joseph D. Millington rr . Robert S. Speckert Robert A: V1iss ;6422`,Newbury Drive W. K 6421 Glenfox'Drive 18131 Lakep6�mnt Lane '•Huntingtoui.Beach, CA 92647 Huntington.Beach, CA, 92647.' Huntington Beach, CA_ 92647 t i -r-159-683 0.5. '�' --• df- 159-083---�4 - '' df- -�159-084-07 d `John N. .Cupp v ; James W'_G-od.axr�, et al Ri chard M.".Garay �-''6432 Newbury Drive ;� ` 6411 Glenfox-:.Drive 18141 Lakepoint Lane F, iuntingten,Beach, CA. 92647 Huntington Beach,'.CA 92647. Huntington Beach, CA ��2647 wt t u -5 -083 06 df 159-083 15 df .159-084-08 d gNeil.D. Campbell Paul Fib: Jackie Leon H. Spear E�-16341.Niantic Circle 6702 Lawn Haven Drive 18151 Lakepoing. Lane Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 Huntington Beach,. CA :r92648 Huntington Beach, CA' 9264" - ( � . 1,4159 083 07 ` df 159 083-16 df 159 084=09 d DavidpA Polancic 4 Thomas'L.'.Myers-- Signal`Landmark Inc. 2 �;6462 Nes,,ft y Drive X 6381 Glenfox Drive 17890`Skypark Dr... 'KHuntangtom,Beach, CA. 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647,, :Irvine, CA 92714 ' - tkry Ve 159-083-08. df: 159-084-01 df ,'159-084--10 n -d >. F. ::Lawrence R. O'Ryan Jovano Sunghera Talmadge A:' Burks c6472'Newbury Drive 18012 Upperlakd Cir. " ': ' : ' 18152 Brentwell Cir. ?• - q ri `--Huntin_ gton Beach, CA'. 92647 --`- Hutnington'�Beach, CA- �' 92047 fiu�iEington.Beach, CA 92647 YyT74 RL{�NMf'y,y"��� 4 ati 11y �"' -ti ' • ti } 'r\ 159-084-11 df 159-085-03 df 159-085-12 df Harry W. Madosky Brian J. rllerhroek John H. Sin=ns 116142. Brentwell Cir ,:..18101 Brentwell Cir. 18112 Fi bury Lane �Huhti.ngton Beach, CA 92647 i. Humngton Beach, CA. 92647:' Huntington Beach, CA 92647. 159-084-12 '' df 159-085-04 df 159-085-13 df '`ti chael A. Butala Paul I3. Jackle. Charles H. Manley : 18132 BrentwelZ Cir. 6702 Lawn Haven Dr. 18102 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92.647 (159,-084713 df 159-085--05 , df 159-085=14 cif.. f David T. ,Binkley `ems r :. Leroy T. Stickel Jefferson Y Yang 18122,.Brentwell'Cir 18121 Brentwell Cir. . _18092 Fieldbury Lane Iuntington Beach, CA 92647 Huhhington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 ; 159-084-14 df -085=15159-085-06 df 19 df " Ronald T. Wootton Clayton W. Ahrens Charles W. Eberhardt, Jr. , 18112 Brentwell Cr. 18131 Brentwell Cir. 18032 Fieldbury Lane Bunt iatton,Peach, .CA 92647,; - . Huntington. CA 92647; Huntington Beach, CA . ,92547 159L 084-15 " : df 159-085-07 df 1_59-011-01 :df Edward D. Selich, et al Richard A. Buccola Aziz Meraj, et al ,,18102 Brentwell Cir. 18141 Brentwell Cir. 888 Toulon Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Pacific Palisades, CA, 90272 159-084-16 df. 159-085-08 df 159-011-02 df ' Bonnie G. Ainsworth Steve A. O'Keefe, et al Donald W. Noreen I8092 Brentwell Cir. 18151 Brentciell Cir 18021 ItiTestlake Cir. Huntington Beach, CA . 92647 Huhtiington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 9I?648 ' 159-084�17 df 159-085-10 df 159-011-03 df Terry L. Free Gerald D. Baker Terry Daniel ,, 18082 Brentwell Cir. 18132 Fieldbury Lane 18031 Westlake Cir. Hutr£ingbm Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 F-Iubhi.ngton Beach, CA 92648 159-085-01 df_ 159-085-09 df 159-011-04 d. David L. Brinton Thoms P. Hughes John L. Pranin 180B1 Brentwell CIr. 18152 Fieldbury Lane John Ja brook Dr. iIiutrtriggton Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA . '92647 Jay brook Pedro, CA 90732 +. 159-085-02 df 159-085-11 df Berth.V � Bystran 159-011-05 df 18091 Brentwell Cir. William Cowan Charles G. mohnike Huntington Beach, _CA 92647 18122 FieFieldbury Lane 18051 Ilestlake Cr. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 IIunti-ngton Beach, CA 92648 4 Al 159-011-06 df 159-011-15 df 159-011-2.4 df Edward Ii. Harrison William R. SaI03a Michael P. Groener 18061 Westlake Cr. :,.18032 Freshwater Cir. 18021 Freshcrater .Cir. Huntington,„Beach,.;CA: 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Eieach, CA.,: 92648. 159-011-07-,!— df 159-011-16 df 159-011-25 df .Louis W. Spiegel Lois M. Riseling P.O. Box 2447 18072 Freshwater Cir. Walter W. Kortcamp, et al Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 18031 Freshwater Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92448 159-011-08 ­ df :R 159-011-17 df 159-011-26 df Robert N. Opfet- Christopher A. Payne Kjeld Enevoldsen 18081.-Westlake Cir. 18062• Feeshwater tircle 18041 Freshwater Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ; * Huntington Beach, C1\ 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 159-011-09 df 159-011-18 df 159-011-27 df Fred Loyola Dr. John E. Doner John Quilico 6921 L 18052 Freshwater. Cir. 18051 Freshwater Cir. Huntuigton Beach,. CA .92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,•. h'tiintington Beach,-:CA 92468 1.59-011-10 df 159-011--19 df 159-011-23 df Eugene E. Conley Allan R. W I-ii.te Anthony C. minniti 18101 Westlake Cir. 18042 Freshwater Cir. 21757 Tahoe Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 96248 El Toro, CA 92G30 159-011-11' df 9 - - -29 15 -011 20 ;,. df 159 011. df Jack'J. Quinton ' Kenney M.* Jefferys S Suaan Martichuski 181111-lestlakd-Cir. 13032 Freshvrater Cir. 18071 Freshwater Cir. f Huntington Beach, CA � 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CP. 92648 159-011-12 df 159-011-21 df 159-011-30 df ' Mendell W. Schubert Robert D. Balsiger Donald T. Turner P.O. Box 1293 18022 Freshwater Cir. 18081 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA .92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 :159--011-13 df 159-011-22 df 159-011-31 df John G: Robbins Robert M. Olson . Harvey .Levitt, et al. z -18102'Freshwater Cir. 18012 Freshwater Cir. 7572 Taylor Ave. Huntington-Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 -1597011.14 _ df 159-011-23_ . df 159-011-32 df . Melvin L. Shackelford" John L. Price"x a Merlyn R.' Wilson 18092 Freshwater Cir. 18013. Freshwater Cir. 18101 Freshwater Cir.- -,,Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92*48 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 165-022-19s 165-023-05s 165-023-15s ,. Davis, Curtis J Wood, Gayle W Jr Taylor, Armond D 6811 Vista Del Sol Dr 6832 Vista Del Sol Dr 6761 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 j Huntington Beach, CA92647 Huntington Beech, CA .92647 ! 165-022-20s 165-023-06s 165-023-16s Strnage, Robert. Harris, William L Abbott, Winona S 6312 Vista Del Sol Dr 6831 Vista Del Sol Dr 6781 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-023-07s 165-023-17s 165-022-21s Kemp, Shirley L C harles L Davis Souza, Gerald J i 6802 Vista Del Sol Dr i 6791 Va Corona 6841 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach,. CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647. 165-022-22s 165-02.3-08s 165-023-18s 792 Vista Del Sol Dr Rains, Francis E 6 gen, Gary L Propper, Edward S '. 6851.Vista Del Sol Dr 792 6801 Via Carona Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Peach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-022-Zs Dobson, Joh 165-023-19s Allen, Charles E 6782 Dobson, John r Belyea, ClauOette Y 6861 Vista Del Sol Dr Vista Del Sol A 6811 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Peach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92 647 165-023 Ms 165-023-10s 165,-022-24s Ha an, Clyde M McKenzie, Allen M Lindsey, T. Kirby 6762 Vista Del Sol Dr 6831 Via Carona Dr 6871 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-023-21s 165-023-01s 165-023-11s Shanahan, James P Stuppy, Laurence J 2nd Marsoun, Robert P 6841 Via Carona Dr 6752 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington reach, CA 9?.647 6872 Vista Del Sol Dr g e .Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-023-12s j Burmeister, Herman C Barnard, arr , ' s -165-023-02s 6732 Vista Del Sol Dr IIP��ry W 6851 Via Carona I Spanovich, Nicholas Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6862 Vista Del Sol 'Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 'Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-023-13s 165-023-23s. . Levy, Howard L Nilson, Douglas A z 165-023-03s 6731 Via Corona Dr Dr ::Bateson, George C Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Via Carona , CA 926476852 Vista Del Sol Dr ington Peach, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-023-04s 165-023-14s 165-023-24s Scheider, Richard A Bradley, James P Jr Sanbrano, Albert 6751 Via Carona Dr 6842 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6871 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-031-30s 165-032-01s 165=032-lls Fry, Franklin Ii etal Tr Silverman, Stanley E Liningston, Gordon - 17602 E1 Nopal In 6882 Via Angelina Dr P.O. Box 1313 Iuntington Beach-CA 92647 Huntington Peach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 . '165-031-31s 165-032-02s 165-031-12s Dept cE Vets Affairs St of CA libodley, George A Snider, Larry C -Churcldll, Lulubel D 6892 Via Angelina Dr 6881 Vista Del Sol Dr 17612 El Nopal Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Hutntington ?''each, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 t :.165-031-32s 165-032-03s 165-033-01 ` Sweeney, Albert E' Munro, Larry G . Gocke, Ralph T 17622 E1 Nopal in 6362 Newbury Dr 6882 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Iuntington Reach, CA 92J6�47 ' 165-031-33s 165-032-04s 165-033-02s Dwyer, John M Chapman, Shirley A Agulian, Daniel 17632 El Ncpal In 2912 Via Angelina Dr 6892 Vista Del Sol Dr IA ?tingtcn Beach, .CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 926 ' 165-031-34s 6 -032- 5s -0 -1 5 0 165 33 03s � Mann, James W Sarna, Gary R Erons, Jack C 17642 El Nopal in 6922 Via Angelina Dr 6902 Vista Del Sol Dr } IDmtington Mach, CA 92647 Huntington Peach, CA 92647 Iuntington Leach, CA 92-51 i 165-031-35s. 165-032-06s 165-033-04s �! Sands, Robert C Newcomb, Carolyn Mailman, Kenneth CJ 17652 E1 Nopal Ln 6932 Via Angelina Dr 6912 Vista Del Sol Dr Hunztington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 926,17 .165-031-36s 165-032-07s 165-033-05s Teel, James C Zsignond, Frigyes Palajac, Mark 17662 E1 Nopal In 6931 Vista Del Sol Dr _ 6922 Vista Del Sol Drfl.. J, Iitimtingtm Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, C_A 926 417 165-031-37s 165-032-08s 165-033-06s ` McCourti.e, James F Bolton, Herbert J Simon, Harlan R 17672 El Nopal In 6921 Vista Del Sol Dr 6932 Vista Del Sol Dr Ihmti.ngton Beach, CA 92647 I-hntingtcn Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 925,17 i 165-031-38s _ 165-032-09s 165-033-07s Lande, James'R. Haddad, Ingrid Foster, Pulliam S 17692 E1 Nopal in 6911 Vista Del Sol Dr 6931 Via Carona Dr lhmtingtcn Beach, CA 92647 IIuntingtan Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach., CA 92547 165-031-39s 165-032-10s 165-033-08s Cn3mley, Kenneth E Da%ems, Thcmas M Salaya, Ralph 17702 E1 Nopal Ln 6901 Vista Del Sol Dr 6921 Via Carona Dr fhmtington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92547 165-024-31s 165-031-PSmm 09s 165-031-020s Reach, NLichal J Groncy, Charles E Schuster, Fredrick L Jr --: 6742 Jardines Tar 6961 Los Amigos Cir 6881 Via Angelins Dr is Huntington Beach,'CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-024-32s 165-031-10s 165-031-21s Ross, Williaan M Ridout, Philip F Gross, Theodore D `6712 Jardines Dr 6962 Los Amigos Cir 6891 Via Angelina Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92G47 165-031-01s 165-031-22s Furlong, .Kevin M 165-031-11s Baugh, Philip D 6f Amigos Cir Lietz, Hans 6901 Via Angelina Dr IHcn Beach, CA 92647 6952 Los Amigos. Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, Ch 92647 102s 165-031-23s J 165-031-12s Capisi, Richard 6881 Los Amigos Cir Garrick, Donald K 6911 Via Angelina Dr Burn Beach, CA 92647.. 6942 Los Amigos Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92.647 Huntington Beach, .CA 92647 165 0 -03s 165-031-24s S Ronald G 165-031-13s Mtnday, George 689 �L'os Amigos Cir Greenwood, Marvin C 6921 Via lW- elina Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6922 Los Amigos Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 .. 165 -04s 165-03 -14s 165-031-25s 1 Mort, Harold F Kerce, Herbert M Wallace,• Donald A 690 Los Amigos Cir 6912 Los Amigos Cis 6931 Via Angelina Dr IIun gton Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165 05s 165-031-15s 165-031-26s J Frank Q Dept of Vet Affairs St of CA Alverson, William L 6911 s Amigos Dr Harris, 1, to J 6941 Via Angelina Dr Hun gton Beach, CA 92647 6902 los Amigos Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92647 i Huntington BFach, CA 92647 ' 165-031-06s 165-031-27s Taub, Rudy J 165-031-16s Jones, Robert G 6921 Los Amigos Cir Viney, John A 6961 Via Angelina Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6892 Los Amigos Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-03107s 165-031-18s 165-031-28s Craft, Ralph P Rogers, Jesse C Le Fehre, Robert L 6941 Los. Amigos Cir 6872 Los Amigos Cir 17582 F1 Nopal In Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Peach, CA 92647 Huntington Peach, CA 92.647 165-031-08s 165-031-19s 165-031-29s Davidson, Robert M Chrispens, John B Dept of Vets Affairs St of CA 6951 Los Amigos Cir 6871. Via Angelins Dr Matsuura, George T Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington reach, CA 92647 17592 rl Nopal. In 165-024-01s 165=-024-lls 165-024-2.1s Rush, James A Dubuc, bSa�ry K Blank, Gorge F j 6872"Via Corona -Dr 11151 Mines Blvd 6851 Jarines Dr Huntington Beach,' CA 92647 Whittier UA 90605 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-024-02s 165-024-12s 165-024-2.2s Belknap, Simeon E Scott, Walter-T Dept of Vets Affairs Of CA . 6862 Via carom Dr 6732 Via Carona Dr Preston, Fred W Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6862 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 '.'165-024-03s 165-024-13s Trester, 'Kenneth D Lyons, Mac L 165-024-23s 6852 .Via Carona Dr Wilfert, Martin E 17702 Avilla in . Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6852 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA 9?64 165-024-04s 165-024-14s 165-024-24s D rphy, Darrell H Rector, Richard C Iiill, Edward R .. 6842 Via Carona Dr 6751 Jardines Dr 6842 Jardines Dr Iuntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92.64; In 165-024-05s 165-024-15s 165-024-025s Latina, Robert J Koch, Raymond O Raigoza, Frederick M etal. 6832 Via Carona Dr 6761 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6812 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 97G41 165-024-06s Steele, John C 165-Q24-16s 165-024-26s 6812 Via Carona Dr Metro, Stephen E Bitting, Jesse L 6781 Jardines Dr 6802 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA W 5G 7 ,{ 165-024-07s 165-024-17s Resnick, Edward R 165-024-27s i Blanciak, 'Robert S McCaffery, Patrick G j 6802 Via Carona Dr 6791 Jardines Dr 6792 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Iuntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ' ., 165-024-08s 165-024-18s Kendron, James H 165-0?_4-0�8s 6792 Via Caraona Dr McGilton, Iloward J Sutis, Damaso H Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6801 Jardines Dr 6782 Jardines Dr tingt Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 9264:7 165-024-09s_ 165-024-19s Pedigo, William H etal Finis, James R 165-024-29s Hoxsie, Robert D 6782 Via Carona Dr 6811 Jardines Dr 6762 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647ntington reach, CA 92()47 165-024-10s 165-024-20s 165-024-30s Schnorr, Ronald F ScIDallas, Tha*ias C 6762 Via Carona Dr 684 Jar, Victor J 6752 Jardines Dr "Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6841 Huntington c a Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA_2647 165=-33=99s McCarthy, Francis D 165-034-07s 165-034-16s -6911 Via Carona Dr Kauffroath, Lyle L Neyman, Robert 1 Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 6931 Rio Vista Dr 6892 Rio Vista Dr �:..,. .. Huntington Peach, CA 92.647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647-" 165-033-10s 165-034-17s Psetolis, Thomas C 165-034-08s Cuiddon, Irrmiett T 6901 Via Carona Dr Rivera, Ray 6902 Rio Vista Dr_ Huntington Beach, CA 92647 . 6921 Rio Vista Dr Iuntington Deach, CA 92647 Huntington Peach, CA 92647 165-033-11s `` 165-034-18s Curtis, Deno L' 165=-34-09s Boswell, Robert L 6891 Via Carona Dr Smith, Vernard B 6912 Rio Vista Dr Huntington Leach, CA 92647 6911 Rio Vista Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92�� Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-033-12s 165-034-10s 165-034-19s Koldsbaek, Bent I MacDonald, R IT Malis, John . 6881 Via Carona Dr 6901 Rio Vista Dr 6922 Rio Vista Dr Fhurtington,Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA .92647 Iiuntington Beach, CA 9264 165-034-01s 165-034-11s 165-034-20s Johansson, Per G ?Aldridge, Stanley J Bisset, Stephen C � 6882 Via Carona Dr 6891 Rio Vista Dr 6932 Rio Vista Dr 'Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA92647 Huntington Peach, CA 92; 41 , 165-034-02s 165-034-12s 165-034-021s i . Leamy, Lawrence J Johnson, Andrew S Flower, Thyra H lJ ' 6892 Via Carona Dr 6881 Rio Vista Dr 6942 Rio Vista T-,I.r Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-034-03 165-034-13s 165-034-022s McGarrigle, Walton J Allen, Jack E Boyte, Billy R. 6902 Via Carona Dr 6871 Rio Vista Dr 6952 Rio Vista Dr R Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Peach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 9-j6 ! ' 165-034-04s 165-034-23s Gayto¢�, Thansa S 165-034-14s Benevento, Giacomo .. 6912 Via Carona Ave Bouthillier, David L P. 0. Box .1231 !.,Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6872 Rio Vista Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-161-01s 165-034-05s $ Partiidge, Godfrey R Pearce, Leon N " 6922 ,Via Carona Dr 6691 Crista Palm Dr "Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Inntington Beach, CA 92647 . 165-034-06s 165-034-15s 165=161-02s Rand, Hayden G Gordon, Robert 14 Kelly, John A Jr etal 6932 Via Carona Dr 6882 Rio Vista Dr 4281 Tnmtbull I7r .Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 165-161-03s 165-164-02s 165-165-06s Perlowitz, Sy -— _ _.-_::=-` Bebout, Thcmas L -6671 Crista Palma Dr Claflin,lRoland V 6592 Jardines Dr "Huntington Beach, CA 92647 - - Huntington Beach, CA 92647, `-, { 6682 Jardines Dr ' 165-161-04s fi 165-151-01s McDermott, Donna L Robinson, Wesley 6661 Crista Palm Dr 6572 Crista Palma Dr ,,Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Iuntington Beach, CA 92647 165-151-02s 165-164-02s - 165=161-05s Claflin Ralydnd V Bro�n , Dewayn L Hunt, James B , 6562 Crista Palma Dr ' 6651 Crista Palma Dr 6682 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-164-03s 165-151703s 165-161-06s FredetteW Richard P Hayward, David K Schuck, Bruce R 6552 Crista Palma Dr 6672 Jardines Dr 6641 Crista Palma Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA -92647 165-151-04s 165-164-04s 165-162-01s Settles, Keith A Orris, Paul L 66 2 Charles M 6542 Crista Palma Dr 6621 Crista Palma Dr 6662 HuntJardington Be ch Huntington Beach, CA 92647 , Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Htntinyt�� Beach, GA 92647 165-162-02s 165-151-05s - 165-1 Ols Scott, Adeline E Bernhoff, Oscar A Smith,- James M 6611 Crista Palma Sr Bern off, Oscar Dr 6532 Crista PaLroa Dr •;. Huntington Beach, CA 92647Jardines Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (7,0 165-162-03s . 165-151-06s 165-165-02s , .. Lee, Eui K PalmSiegrist, Bill W i`,00re, Robert E ° 6601 Crista Pa] 6632 Jardines Dr 6522 Crista Palma Dr .'' Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 926,17 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-162-04s 165-165-03s 165-151-07s Vander Loo, Hendrik J Mackinen, William F Lietz, Manfred K . :6591 Crista Parma Dr 6622 Jardines Dr 6521 Segovia Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-163-01s. 165-165-04s 165-151-08s Ocean View School Dist : Ryan, John S Noell, Louis A ,. 7972 Warner Ave 6612 Jardines Dr. :�` 6531 Segovia Cir '<�Huntington Reach CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 647 165-151-09s ? 165-164-01s Cole , Edwa-05srd Landry, Robert E Takahama, Janes 11 Coley, Edward S 6541 Segovia Cir 6692 Jardines Dr 6602 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA Huntington B-ach, (A 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-151-10s 165-151-20s 165-151-30s Swenson, Jospehy A Kelsey, Severn L Lo Schiavo, Albert A S 6531 Montoya Cir 6522 Montoya Cir . 6551 Segovia Cie : 6551 gt� Heath, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647:: 165-151-31s is reglia, Lawrence A 165-151-21s Carbonell. RobertE 6561 561 Segovia Cir McGraw, Ion 6521 Sabbicas Cir 6 6541 Montoya Cir Huntington Leach, CA 92647 Huntingtari'Heach, CA 92G47 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-151-12s 165-151-22s Gilbert, Ronald 1G Logan, James E 165-151-32s 6571. Segovia Cir 6551 Montoya Cir Groves,. Walter A .Huntington Heath, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6531 Sabbicas Cir A Huntington Beach, CA 926 � 165-151-13s 165-151-23s I Spain, Raymond G Sheffield, Paul S 165-151-33s 6572 Segovia Cis 6561 Montoya Cir Quinn, John S Huntington Beach, ca 22647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6541 Sabbicas Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 165-151-24s 165-151-34s ILI ollpert, H Lawrence, Jack A Jr Estiamba, Carlos 6562 Segovia Helen L etal 6571 Montoya Cir 6551 Sabbicas Cir 6562 Segovia Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 I� 165-151-15s 165-151-25s 165-151-35s Bates, Robert R G. Green, Mahlon S U Bonham, William H 6572 Montoya Cir 6561 Sabbiczas Cir 6552 Segovia Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-151-26s 165-151-36s 165-151- Harris, John V Sandguist, Georgia Eckennann, Edward N P.O. Box 1938 6571 Sabbicas Cir 6542 Segovia Cir Iuntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 9264� ,.Huntington Beach, CA 92647 is 165-15-17s 165-151-27s Lawrence, Robert D Bennet, C Leeman 165-151-37s 6532 Segovia Cir 6552 Montoya Cir Warren, Venkat Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6572 Sabbicas Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-151-18s 165-151-28s Lewicki, robert J Van Hoorebeke, DAvid P 165-151-38s 522 Segovia Cis 6542 Montoya Cir Nadolski, Leon R 6522 Sego Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 6562 Sabbicas Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-151-29s 165-151-39s Chambers, Elwood S Gore, Richard B Robitaille, Earle W Jr 6521 Montoya E 6532 Montoya Cir 6552 Sabbicas Cir 521 Mtoya Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 a 165-151-40s 165-152-02s 165-151-12s Walker, Robert L Hollway, Heber II Silverstein, Fred 6542 Sabbicas Cir 6571 Crista Palma Dr 17541 San Roque Ln Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-15-41s 165-152-03s 165-153:13s. Hemphill, Bruce T IIum, James Winterowd, Tolalter R -6532 Sabbicas Cir 6561 Crista Palma Dr 17551 San Roque Ln :Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ' 165-151-42s 165-152-04s 165-151-14s Wells, David R Bolin, Charles W Steiger, Herbert M 6522 Sabbicas Cir 6551 Crista Palma Dr 17561 San Prue Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 IIunti.ngton Beach, CA 92647 Iuntington Beach, CA 916i4��� 165-161-43s 165-152-05s 165-152-15s Stiles, Oliver D March, John F Buck, Charles VI 6521 Jardines Dr .., 6541 Crista Palma Dr 17571 San Roque Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 9264�(7- 165-151-44s 165-152-06s 165-152-16s Boulter, Bruce C Lanternier, Ralph M Teague, James D 6531 Jardines Dr 6531 Crista Palma Dr 17581 San Roque Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 926,f7 II 165-151-45s 165-152-07s 165-152-17s Smtth, Jose C S Hobrecht, Alvin J Spencer, Charles P 6541 Jardines Dr 6521 Crista Palma Dr 17591 San Roque Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 926A L 165-151-46s 165-152-08s 165-152-18s i Ostovarpour, Ali A etal Anthony, William J Peed, John E j 6551 Jardines Dr. 6511 Crista Palma Dr 17601 San Roque In Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, .CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 •165-151-47s 165-15-09s 165-152-19s ` Smith, Frederic A McDowell, Eion F Towgood, Dennis Ii 6561 Jardines Dr 6501 Crista Palma Dr 17611 San Roque Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-151-48s 165-152-10s 165-152-20s .,Di Pietro, Joe Lepore, Paul J Jr Lange, James 6571 Jardines Dr 17521 San Roque Ln 17621 San Roque Ln Huntington Beach, .CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-152-01s 165-152-11s 165-152-21s Freihet, Ronald A Jenson, James H Hair, 'v7ilLiam H 6581 Crista Palma Dr 17531 San Roque Ln 17631 San Rogue Ln Huntington Beach, M 92647 Cn, 9?r47 NAmtipgt-nn ge�?ch, CA. 92FR7 165-152-22s 165-152-32s Carter, Allen R Ccnpardo, Elizabeth L 17641 San Roque Ln 6562 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-152-23s 165-152-33s 'Phillips, Lester L R Jr Lee, Wayne R 17651 San Roque Ln 6572 Jardines Dr ;Huntingt� Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-152-24s 165-152-34s ,.Senn,..Alan R Thonpson, Allan R 17661 San Roque Ln 6582 Jardines Dr ' Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-152-25s Final Typing March 27, 1978 Matlock, William B Susan Pierce 17671. San Roque Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 _ 165-152-26s Heustis, Robert W 6502 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 i 165-152-27s 1� Darling, Robert E ..J 6512 Jardines Dr i 'Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-152-28s ' It Mowbray, Gerard 6522 Jardines Dr 4 - 14ntington Beach, CA 92647 165-152 R]2 29s Malkus, Robert J 6532,Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-152-30s Ricardo, Fredrick J Jr 6542 Jardines Dr :.Huntington Beach, CA 92647 165-152-31s Carlson, Donald R 6552 Jardines Dr Huntington (77\ n*)rA7 o . D CITY OF HUcNTINGTON BEACH < <.< AP R 197 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ""NFI"GT°^BEACH CITY OF HUNTII�GTO�J .BFACI,1 ADMINHSTRATNE OFFICE. . . .. . To NORM WORTHY, DIRECTOR From GEORGE WILLIAMS, CHAIRMAN RECREATION & PARKS DEPT. Z1,VA4Ae �04oep Subject Date �:.. SKATEBOARD PARK April 27 , 1978 At the last regular meeting of the..Library. Board, a motion was passed that the Library Board is in opposition to the proposal that -a Skate - board Park -be placed in Central City Park. . Some of the current concerns which effect the Library Board are: , 1. Traffic . In that this is being promoted as an Olympic Skateboard Park suggesting large crowds on' a regular basis, the traffic .in .the immediate area will be -a problem.. 2. Parking it 4 - - 1 It is expected that the Library parking lot will be used for overflow parking. In that parking is less than adequate now, its anticipated use by the Skateboard Park creates an additional problem. - In that it is expected that the Library will reopen on Sundays in the' near future, this precludes the use of -this area by skateboard users as a parking area. 3. Sound In that the wind in this area- is almost always from the -south— west, the sound from both the crowds and public address systems becomes a real concern and on weekends would be especially disturbing to Library patrons and other park users. 4 . Lighting In that the Skateboard Park is designed on an east-west align- meet with finished lines for races at the west end of the Skate— board Park, it follows that lighting would be at the west end shining eastward. Said lights would shine in the windows of the. Library. 5. - Compatibility The Skateboard Park is inconsistent with a nature center, picnic and camping areas, and the Library. For these and the simple reasons that a commercial venture of this magnitude in the center of what is a very beautiful and highly used park in its present condition, the Library Board is opposed to this intended use. cc: Floyd Belsito RTS COTM'MISSION 7111 TALBERT AVENUE • HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 • TEL: (714) 842-4481 April 27, 1978 D ECE9 � D APR 2 1978 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRA.TWE OFFICE Norm Worthy, Director Recreation & Parks Department City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Worthy: In reviewing the Environmental Impact Report submitted to the Recreation & Parks Department regarding the Skateboard Park, the Allied Arts Commission at its meeting held on April 18th, voted to express their opposition to the Skateboard Park. In that the Library is the cultural center of the City and anticipates growth and additional facilities. for that purpose, a Skateboard Park would be incompatible with this use. It is expected that a sculpture garden, an auditorium, an art gallery, and learning resource and experience centers will be proposed. A Skateboard Park would appear to be inconsistent with these other uses . The traffic and noise created by a Skateboard Park would discount any possibility of future art and music events, similar to the very successful ones that have been held in the park in the past. For these reasons the Allied Arts Commission wishes to express its opposition. Sincerely, Howard Hitchcock, Chairman Allied Arts Commission HH:ms cc: Bud Belsito ✓ 44"J& CITY OF HUNTINGTON' BEACH J17- INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION CITY pOi 1114i ll��t�ON ;;; ;'t !I I IIINIIN(JON IIIM 11 To Floyd G. Belsito From Edward D. SelichZ� - City Administrator Planning Director ~- - Subject EIR 77-9 (Olympic Skateboard Date April 24 , 1978 Park) The enclosed final Environmental Impact Report is being transmitted to the City Council for their review. The EIR assesses the potential environmental effects of a proposed skateboard park on a 12 acre site to be leased from the City in Huntington Central Park. The EIR has been prepared and distributed for public review in accordance with the City' s environmental procedures and the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. The proposed lease agreement and EIR are scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on May 15 , 1978 . A draft EIR was distributed to governmental agencies and interested members of the general public during a 30-day review period to solicit comments regarding the project. As required in the City' s environmental procedures a public hearing was held by the Planning Department to invite further comments regarding the environmental effects of the project. An additional public hearing was held by the Recreation and Parks Commission to consider the EIR and project proposal . Recommendations of the Recreation and Parks Commission will be transmitted to the City -J Council at the May 15 meeting. The final EIR consists of the draft EIR, written and verbal comments received during the public review period, and Planning Department public hearing , and the City' s response to the comments received. According to the City' s environmental procedures , the alternative actions that can be taken by the City Council regarding the EIR are as follows: 1 . Certify the EIR as being complete and in conformance with the City' s environmental procedures and CEQA Guidelines. 2 . Modify the EIR either directly or through Staff to incorporate new information regarding the environmental effects of the project. After modifications are made the Council should certify the EIR. 3 . If the project is approved allowing occurrence of significant effects identified in the final EIR without mitigation, the City Council should state in writing the reasons to support its action in accordance with Section 15089 of the CEQA Guidelines . EDS:JRB: s CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH _t INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION I II IN i1NG ION 81M II To F . G. Belsito From Recreation & Parks Commission City Administrator Subject SKATEBOARD ENVIRONMENTAL" Date April 20 , 1978 IMPACT REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING On Wednesday, April 12 , the Recreation and Parks Commission conducted a public hearing on the Environmental Impact Report of the Huntington Central Park Concession Company' s proposed skateboard facility within Huntington Central Park prepared by Envista , Inc . An overflow crowd attended the four hour hearing in the Council Chambers and 38 people addressed the Commission concerning the proposed project . At the conclusion of the hearing , the Commission approved the Environmental Impact Report as presented by Envista , Inc . , but recommended that until the results of the Huntington Central Park recreational facility survey is received, approval of the skateboard --park at its present location not be given. Staff indicated the survey results will be completed and available to the Commission prior to their regular meeting of Wednesday, May 10 , which would give them time to analyze the desires of local residents and to forward their recommendations on to the City Council prior to their meeting of Monday, May 15 . Therefore , the City Council should have adequate information on which to conduct their public hearing of the Envista Skateboard Park Environmental Impact Report on May 15 if they choose to do so . R pectfully submitted, , . �rm Worthy , S cretary NW: cgs Recreation & P rks Commission cc : Recreation & Parks Commission f s OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 2000 Main Street Nwh gale PWZW Huntington Beach, California 92648 U.s Pbss* co ao 1 Published Huntington Beach News, April 27, 1978. LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SKATEBOARD PARK NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Pub- lic Hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of review and certification of EIR 77-12 and considera- tion of a proposal relating to the con- struction or a Skateboard Park to be located on the west side of Goldenwest Street at Talbert Avenue in Huntington Central Park. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on May 15, 1978 in the Council Chambers Building of the Hunt- ington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street ,Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions regardng this matter. For further information regarding the Environmental Impact Report contact the City Department of Planning and Environmental Resources, 536-5270. For further information regarding specifics of the project contact the City Department of Recreation, Parks and Human Services, 536-5486. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Number of Excerpts Publish Once March 30 , 1978 LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Recreation and Parks Commission of the City of Huntington Beach , California , for the purpose of considering a proposal to construct a skateboard park on a twelve ( 12 ) acre site located on the west side of Golden West Street at Talbert Avenue in Huntington Central Park . Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7 : 00 p . m. , on April 12 , 1978 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach , California . All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed skateboard park . Further information may be obtained from the City Recreation , Parks and Human Services Department , 536-5486 . DATED THIS 27th DAY OF MARCH , 1978 . CITY RECREATION AND PARKS COMMISSION BY Norm Worthy , Secretary A • L 'A �l ' i J. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION Up HUNTINGTONBEACH riDiv,i���( Y r To Richard Harlow From Recreation and Parks Assistant City Administrator Commission Subject OLYMP I C SKATEBOARD PARK Date March 10, 1978 In order to permit more time to discuss concerns expressed relative to the E. I .R. draft for the Olympic Skateboard Park and give the opportunity for public hearing at their April 12 , 1978 meeting, the Recreation and Parks Commission took the following action at their March 8 , 1978 meeting: MOTION: Mr. Don Mac Allister moved the Recreation and Parks Commission recommend to the City Council that the Skateboard Park item be moved to the April 17, 1978 City Council agenda. Motion seconded by Mr. Joe Costa. MOTIOTI CARRIED. A meeting of the Huntington Central Park Committee has been scheduled for March 22 , 1978 to discuss the Skateboard Park issue. They would appreciate knowing the decision concerning this request prior to their meeting. Respectfully submitted, Vivian Borns , Acting Secretary Recreation and Parks Commission VB:ps cc : Recreation and Parks Commission Norm worthy r l i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA, 7 7-7 7 qI COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Honorable Mayor and From Floyd G. Eelsito City Council Members City Administrator Subject SKATEBOARD SUBLEASE Date June 1 , 1977 Section 14 of the Skateboard Lease Agreement between the City and the Huntington Central Park Concession Company provides that the lessee may sublease the premises with written approval of the City. The letter of transmittal for the lease agreement indicated that the sub- lessee would be Universal Skate Parks , Inc. Attached is a sub- lease between the Huntington Central Park Concession Company and Universal Skate Parks , Inc . which will allow the latter party to operate the recreational facility. By echoing the requirements of the lease , the sublease ensures that the obligations required of the Huntington Central Park Company will b*e carried out by Universal Skate Parks , Inc . It should be understood that the sublease is between the HCP Company and Universal Skate Parks , Inc. and that the City is not a party to the agreement . However, the written permission of the City is required before the sublease can be executed. The document has been approved as to form by the City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the sublease between the HCP Company and Universal Skate Parks , Inc. Authorize the City Administrator to give written approval for execution. V Respectfully submitted, . 1 Floyd Belsito ( ( � City dministrator LQ 4� FGB :DLC :bb Attachment - 5���� o°\ wKk CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ?IIINIINh11/N N[ACII - - To Dick Harlow From Jim Palin, Assistant Director Assistant Administrator Planning Department Subject SKATEBOARD ENVIRONMENTAL. Date June 3, 1977 DOCUMENTATION Pursuant to your request for information on the requirement for environ- mental documentation for the skateboard park to be constructed within Central Park, please be advised that the guidelines. for the Environmental _- _ Quality Act define a project as " . . . a project means the whole of an action which has a potential for resulting in a physical change in the . environment, directly or ultimately, that is any of the following: (3) An activity involving the issuance to a . person of .a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies. " Pursuant to the Environmental Quality Act it is necessary to have environ- mental documentation prior to review for entitlement and as defined by the guidelines approval . in connection with private activities approval occurs upon the earliest commitment to issue or on- issuance by a public agency of a discretionary contract, grant, loan or any other forms of financial assistance, lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use of ,a .project." Therefore, it would be necessary .for the City Council to review the environmental documents prior to approval of the sublease for the skate" board facility within Central Park.. Trust this information will suffice pursuant to your request. J tdf q O p E C E WE DI ,.J U 1977. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEWI ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE f� � I COPY SUBCONCESSION AGREEMENT AND SUBLEASE THIS SUBCONCESSION AGREEMENT AND SUBLEASE is made this day of 1977 , by and between HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK CONCESSION COMPANY, a California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Sublessor") , and UNIVERSAL SKATE PARKS , INC. , a California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Sublessee") , with regard to the following recitals of fact: R E C I T A L S : A. The City of Huntington Beach (hereinafter referred to as "City" ) , owns and controls certain park lands known as Huntington Central .-Park , in the City , State of California. B. The City, as Lessor , and Sublessor , as Lessee , have executed, or about to execute , the Skateboard Park Lease , a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference made a part hereof . The terms and provisions of the Skateboard Park Lease shall be incor- porated specifically' where applicable hereinafter. C. Sublessee desires to construct and operate a Skateboard Park within Huntington Central Park. NOW, THEREFORE , THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS : l. . Subleased 'Premises . Sublessor , for and in consideration of the rents , covenants and conditions herein • contained to be kept , performed and observed by Sublessee , does sublease and demise to Sublessee , and Sublessee does rent and accept from Sublessor , the real property referred to as the "Subleased Premises" described in paragraph 2 of Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 1� 1 • 2 . Term. This Sublease shall commence and become effective upon execution by the City and Sublessor of the Skateboard Park Lease marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto which provides for the activities to be carried on hereunder and which demises to Sublessor the Subleased Premises (and other land if applicable) , and the execution by the City of a written consent to the making of this Subconcession Agree- ment (hereinafter referred to as' the "Commencement Date" ) . Sublessor shall notify Sublessee in writing when this Commence- ment Date is determined and a statement thereof shall be attached as an exhibit hereto and shall be signed by the parties. The attachment of such exhibit shall not be a conditioh. to effectiveness of this Sublease . This Sublease shall be -for a term of twenty (20) years from the date of execution of the Skateboard Park Lease . The term of this Sublease is divisible as follows : A. Construction Period. The "Construction Period" under this agreement is hereby defined as that period of time commencing with the Commencement Date and ending either at such time as Sublessee begins sales or services to patrons , or at the expiration of nine (9) months from the Commencement Date , whichever shall first occur . During that time , Sublessee shall construct or cause to be constructed at least those improvements described in Exhibit "B" hereto to the point of completion. B. Operating Period. The "Operating Period" is hereby defined as that period of time commencing as of the expiration of the Construction Period as set forth in Subsection A above , and continuing thereafter until the termination of the Sublease. �2_ i 3 . Rental. The Sublessee shall pay for the use of the Subleased Premises during the term of this Sublease for the following enumerated fees and percentages : A. Construction Period. No rental shall be payable for. the Construction Period as defined in paragraph 2A above. B. Operating Period. (i) Upon commencement of the Operating Period , Sublessee shall pay to Sublessor each calendar quarter during the Operating Period , at the times and in the manner hereinafter provided , an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the gross receipts from the Subleased Premises for the first Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400 ,000 .00) of gross receipts and eleven percent (11%) of the gross receipts for all gross receipts over Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400 ,000 .00) . In the event the percentage rental which Sublessor is obliged to pay to the City as rent for the Skateboard facilities under the Skateboard Park Lease should be revised to different percentages by reason of the application of para- graph 6 of the Skateboard Park Lease , then said percentage of gross receipts payable hereunder shall be modified or adjusted upward or downward to a percentage of gross receipts which is equal to two hundred percent (200%) of the percentages which the Skateboard Park Lease [paragraphs 3b , (1) (i) , (ii) and (iii) ] provides for after each such revision. Such revised percentages hereunder shall continue in effect until revised pursuant to paragraph 6 of the Skateboard Park Lease , or .until the termination hereof , whichever is earlier . -3- In the event Sublessor is called upon to discuss , negotiate or arbitrate percentage rentals applicable to skateboard facilities , Sublessee shall have the right to participate therein. 4 . Payment of Rental . Sublessee covenants and agrees that on or before the fifteenth (15th) day of each month of the Operating Period, it will render to Sublessor a full and correct statement of all applicable gross receipts from the preceding calendar month. Beginning with the state- ment of the first month and the first accounting year , each such statement shall show: A. The total gross receipts for the month and year, to date for those items upon which the percentage rental is based, itemized as to each of the separate cate- gories thereof ; B. The itemized amounts of percentage rental for the month and year to date , computed as herein provided and the total thereof ; C. The total percentage rental previously paid by Sublessee for prior months of the current accounting year; D. The percentage rental due for the pre- ceding month. Sublessee covenants and agrees to pay rental payments on the fifteenth. (15th) day of the month following each quarter based on the percentages set forth herein. For all sums due hereunder and delinquent for ten (10) days , there shall be added thereto on such loth day , and for each month of delinquency after such 10th day, a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the total amount then due , which sum shall not be compounded, except that no such -4- 1 penalty shall be imposed which is an unlawful charge accord- ing to the Constitution or laws of the State of California . 5 . Place of Payment and Filing . All rentals shall be payable at, and all statements and reports herein required shall be filed with Sublessor in triplicate at 3500 East Coast Highway , Corona del Mar , California , or at such other .address . or addresses as shall be furnished to Sublessee by written notice from Sublessor . Rentals may be paid by check, provided such checks are honored upon presentation at the drawee bank . 6 . Definition of Gross Receipts . The term "gross receipts" upon which the percentage rentals are to be based shall include : A. The sale price of all goods , wares , merchandise , and products sold on or from the Subleased Premises whether for cash or credit and whether or not payment therefor for sales on credit is actually received; B. The charges made by Sublessee for the sale or rendition on or from the Subleased Premises of services of any nature or kind whatsoever , whether for cash or credit, and whether or not payment therefor is actually received; C . All admissions , entry , rental , and other fees of any nature or kind charged by Sublessee , including but not limited to use of or observation upon or making of pictures at, or making of television transmis- sion from, or making of television recordings or other such audio or visual recordings upon or from the Subleased Premises ; D. The fair rental value of facilities used • by Sublessee for purposes other than the business purposes for which the Subleased Premises are subleased. -5- Gross receipts shall exclude all sales and excise taxes payable by Sublessee to federal , state , county or municipal governments as a direct result of operations under this Sublease. Refunds for goods returned shall be deducted from gross receipts upon return .. Bad debt losses shall not be deducted from gross receipts . Income taxes shall not be deducted from gross receipts. 7 . Records and Accounts , Audits . Sublessee shall , at all times during the term of this agreement keep , or cause to be kept , true and complete books , records and accounts of all financial transactions in the operation of all business activities , of whatever nature , conducted on the Subl6ased Premises . The records must be supported by source' documents such as sales slips , cash register tapes , purchase invoices , or other pertinent documents . All retail sales and charges shall be recorded by means of cash registers or other comparable devices which display to the customer the amount of the transaction and automatically issue a receipt . The registers shall be equipped with devices which lock in sales totals and other transaction records , or with counters which are not resettable and which record transaction numbers and sales details . Totals registered shall be read and recorded at the beginning and end of each day. In the event of admission charges or ren- tals , Sublessee shall issue serial-numbered tickets for each such admission or rental and shall keep an adequate record of said tickets , both issued and unissued. -6- Within ninety (90) days after the end of each accounting year , Sublessee shall at its own expense submit to Sublessor a balance sheet and income statement prepared or audited and certified as to accuracy by a certi- fied public accountant , reflecting business transactions on or from the Subleased Premises during the preceding account- ing year. The statement shall include but not be limited to a showing of gross receipts for the accounting year , and income,, expenses , and deductions reported to the United States of America for income tax purposes , and a. reconcilia- tion of any differences therefrom. All of Sublessee ' s books of account and records related to this Sublease or to business operations conducted within or from the Subleased Premises shall be kept and made available at one location within the limits of the City of Huntington Beach. Sublessor shall have the right to examine and audit said books of account and records at any and all reasonable times for the purpose of determin- ing the accuracy thereof , and may also examine and audit the monthly statements of sales made and monies received. The cost of said audit shall be borne by Sublessor unless the audit reveals a discrepancy of more than five percent (5%) between the rent due as reported by Sublessee in accordance with this Sublease and the rent due as determined by said audit. In the event of a greater discrepancy , the full cost of the audit, as determined by Sublessor , shall be paid by Sublessee. Upon the request of Sublessor , Sublessee shall cooperate in providing , at Sublessee 's expense , in • addition to the data specified above , necessary data to enable Sublessor to fully comply with any and every require- -7- ;;' . ment of the State of California or the United States of America for information or reports relating to this Sublease and to Sublessee ' s use of the Subleased Premises . Such data shall include , if required , a detailed breakdown of Sublessee 's receipts and expenses. 8 . Prohibited Sales . Sublessee shall not have the right to maintain any coin operated machines on the Subleased Premises. Sublessee shall not make any food or beverage sales on the Subleased Premises. Sublessor reserves the right to install coin operated amusement machines and coin operated food and beverage dispensing machines on the Subleased Premises , subject to the express written con- sent of Sublessee which shall not be withheld unreasonably . 9 . Accounting Year . The accounting year shall be from January 1 through December 31 . Such accounting year may at Sublessee ' s option be changed to sublessee ' s taxable year for federal income tax purposes by written notice to Sublessor within nine (9) months after the date of execution of this Sublease. 10 . Use of Demised Premises . The Subleased Premises shall be used by the Sublessee only for the operation of Skateboard facilities and related services , approved by 9gblessor in writing. 11 . Improvements to be Constructed by Sublessee . Sublessee undertakes and agrees to cause to be designed, constructed and installed on the Leased Land , at no cost to Sublessor , those facilities described on Exhibit "B" hereto , and all work related thereto necessary to put the Subleased Premises in the proper condition for the uses allowed under this Sublease. The improvements described in Exhibit "B" are approved by Sublessor and the City of Huntington Beach by execution and consent to this Sublease . -8- No structures , improvements or facilities other than those described in Exhibit "B" shall be constructed , erected or made in , to or upon the. Subleased Premises without the written consent of Sublessor with the approval of the City being first had and obtained , and any condition relating to the manner , method , design and construction of said struc- tures , improvements or facilities fixed by Sublessor and approved by the City shall be a .condition hereof the same as though it had been originally stated herein . It is understood that Sublessor shall not unreasonably withhold such consent. Prior to the construction of any structures or improvements and grading of the Subleased Premises , f Sublessee, shall submit to Sublessor for their written approval a master plan of all construction intended to be made upon the Subleased Premises during the term, including those des- cribed in Exhibit "B" . The skateboard facilities described in Exhibit "B" shall be completed within nine (9) months of Commencement Date of this Sublease. Sublessee shall pay for building permits required by the Lessor . In the event that special events are scheduled causing an overflow crowd of patrons , the Sublessee shall provide sufficient portable r'estrooms for the overflow patrons . The Sublessee shall construct or cause to be constructed an ingress/egress road to the Skateboard Park from Golden West Street. The Sublessor shall invoke provisions of paragraph 9 of the Skateboard Park Lease to cause the City of Huntington Beach to pay for any street improvements (to include curbs , gutters , sidewalks , lighting , drainage , flood control , paving for entire dis- tance of Golden West Street adjacent to Subleased Premises and any other off-site improvements regarding the Subleased Premises) to Golden West Street which adjoins the Skateboard Park. -9- 12 . Definition of Master Plan. A. The Master Plan shall include as a mini- mum: (i) A land use study showing. the archi- tectural concept of all Exhibit "B" and future structures and improvements and landscaping ; (ii) General design plans and specifi- cations . B. The Master Plan may be revised from time to time with the approval of Sublessor and the City , and shall be revised before any facilities other than those described in Exhibit "B" are constructed. 13 . Working Drawings and Specifications . Work- ing drawings and specifications shall be prepared including a layout plan, a site clearance plan , a grading and drainage plan, a utilities plan, a water and irrigation plan , con- struction details , including all structures , a planting plan, specifications and a time schedule , all in accordance with the description of improvements in Exhibit "B" . Said working drawings and specifications shall be reviewed and approved by Sublessor before commence- ment of construction. If they comply with the requirements of Exhibit "B" , they shall be approved. All improvements constructed by Sublessee on the Subleased Premises , including the plans and specifi- cations therefor , .shall conform in all respects to appli- cable statutes and to ordinances , building codes , rules and regulations of the City of Huntington Beach. Sublessee , at its own cost and expense , shall procure all permits necessary • for such construction, except City agrees to waive an environmental impact report or in lieu thereof to provide same if required . All planning and construction by Sublessee pursuant to this clause shall be at Sublessee ' s sole cost -10- and expense. Sublessee shall keep the Subleased Premises and improvements constructed thereon free and clear of all liens for labor and material and shall hold Sublessor harm- less from any responsibility in respect thereto. Within one hundred twenty (120) days after the completion of the Construction Period , the Sublessee shall provide Sublessor with receipted invoices or , in lieu thereof , such other evidence as shall be satisfactory to the Sublessor which evidences the total cost of the structures and improvements made' by Sublessee , and which evidences payment of all bills or debts incurred in such construction and improvement. All construction performed under this Sub- lease shall be in conformance with the terms , covenants and conditions thereof . 14 . A. Completion Bond. No construction shall be commenced upon the Subleased Premises by Sublessee until Sublessee has furnished Sublessor (for the benefit also of the City of Huntington Beach) with a completion bond in the amount of the total estimated construction cost of the improvements described in this Sublease to be constructed by Sublessee. In lieu of such completion bond , Sublessor will accept the performance and labor and material bonds supplied by Sublessee ' s contractor or contractors , provided said bonds cover construction of all improvements and are issued jointly to Sublessee and Sublessor . Said bonds must be issued by a company authorized to do business in the State of California and acceptable to Sublessor . Said bonds shall be in a form acceptable to Sublessor and shall insure faithful and full observance and performance by Sublessee of all the terms , conditions , covenants and -11- agreements relating to construction of improvements upon the Subleased Premises by Sublessee. B. Removal of Facilities Bond. In the event this Sublease is terminated by Sublessor for any reason within three (3) years from and after commencement of operation , Sublessee shall , at Sublessee 's expense , remove all structures and improvements which Sublessor directs Sublessee in writing to remove , and shall restore the premises to its original condition. Sublessor shall give Sublessee written notice for said removal and restoration within thirty (30) days of said termination. Sublessee shall provide Sublessor (for the benefit also of the City of Huntington Beach) with a removal of facilities bond or cash substitute in the sum of Fifty-Thousand Dollars ($50 ,000 . 00) which Sublessor may use in Sublessor ' s sole discretion to remove such .structures and/or improvements Sublessor desires and restore the Sub- leased Premises to its original condition in the event that Sublessee fails and refuses to do so within thirty (30) days after such written notice. Said removal bond or cash substitute shall be posted with Sublessor prior to commence- ment of said removal bond. The term of the removal of facilities bond shall be for three (3) years. and shall c6mmence on the date the City of Huntington Beach issues the certificate of occupancy for the building described in Exhibit "B" , paragraph A, of Skateboard Park Lease or one (1) year after the execution of this Sublease by the Sublessor , whichever first occurs . C. Commencement of Operation. For the purpose of this paragraph 14 , "commencement of operation" shall mean the opening date on which the facility is first opened to the public for skateboard use . Not less than two (2) weeks prior to such opening date , Sublessee shall give written notice to Sublessor of such opening date . -12- If the working drawings and specifications pro- vided for in paragraph 13 , and the completion or subcontrac- tors' bonds provided for in this paragraph are not all furnished to Sublessor within four (4) months after the commencement of this Sublease , this Sublease. shall termin- ate unless such time is extended by mutual written agreement of Sublessor and Sublessee. 15. Ownership of Improvements . All structures and improvements, including alterations if any are made , erected or constructed by Sublessee upon the Subleased Premises , shall remain the property of Sublessee during the term of this Sublease agreement, or any extension or renewal thereof with Sublessor. Upon expiration or upon early termination of this Sublease agreement , for any cause whatsoever , title to all structures and improvements made , erected or constructed upon 'the Subleased Premises shall vest in Sublessor , except such structures or improvements which Sublessor directs Sublessee to remove . However , for the purpose of calculating the rental to be paid by Sublessee in the event of any exten- sion or renewal of this Sublease with Sublessee , all structures and improvements upon the Subleased Premises shall be deemed to be the property of Sublessor. 16 . Right of First Refusal to Re-Lease. If , at the end of the Sublease term or extended term, Sublessor wishes to re-lease the Subleased Premises for the purposes set out in this Agreement , Sublessee shall have the right of first refusal to re-sublease the Subleased Premises , upon the condition that Sublessee shall have performed in every way in good faith each and all of the terms , covenants , -13- and conditions of this Agreement to the reasonable satis- faction of Sublessor . Sublessor shall give Sublessee written notice of its intent to re-lease the Subleased Premises at least sixty (60) days prior to expiration of the Sublease term or Extended Term and shall , at that time , present Sublessee with the terms and conditions upon which the Subleased Premises are to be resubleased. Sublessee shall have thirty (30) days. after such notice within which to accept or reject the offer to re-lease the Subleased Premises upon the terms and condi- tions proposed by Sublessor. If such offer is not accepted within said thirty (30) day period , Sublessor may Sublease the property to another upon the same terms and conditions as those offered to Sublessee . Sublessor agrees , however , that for one hundred eighty (180) days after beginning of the term of such Sublease , it will not offer different terms and conditions to another without first offering Sublessee the opportunity to Sublease the Subleased Premises upon such different terms and conditions . In any event, Sublessee 's right of first refusal shall terminate , absolutely , one hundred eighty (1'80)` days after the end of the term of this Sublease . No provision of this Sublease shall be construed to prevent Sublessor or any public body or governmental corporation from operating the Subleased Premises after termination of this Sublease without creation in Sublessee of any right of first refusal . 17 . Insurance. Sublessee shall maintain insur- ance acceptable to Sublessor in full force and effect through- -14- 4 l out the term of this Sublease , with a carrier or carriers authorized to do business in California . The policy or policies for said insurance shall name Sublessor and the .City of Huntington Beach as insureds and shall , as a minimum, provide the following. forms of coverage in the amounts speci fled: A. Comprehensive Public Liability : (i) One Million Dollars ($1 ,000 ,000 . 00) bodily injury, each person ; (ii) Three Million Dollars ($3 ,000 ,000 . 00) bodily injury , each occurrence ; and (iii) Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300 ,000 .00) property damage . B. Fire and extended coverage , including water damage and debris cleanup provisions , in an amount not less than ninety percent (90%) of the full insurable value of all improvements constructed or installed by Sub- lessee within the Subleased Premises , with the proceeds payable to Sublessor. The public liability insurance shall be in force the first day of the term of this Sublease . The dire insurance shall be in force upon the date of comple- tion of construction or installation of each major insurable improvement by Sublessee. Each policy of insurance shall contain the .fallowing clause : "IT IS AGREED THAT THIS POLICY SHALL NOT BE CANCELLED NOR THE COVERAGE REDUCED UNTIL THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER HUNTINGTON • CENTRAL PARK CONCESSION CO. AND THE DIREC- TOR OF RECREATION AND PARKS OF THE CITY -15- OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SHALL HAVE RECEIVED WRITTEN NOTICE OF SUCH CANCELLATION OR REDUCTION. THE NOTICE SI-IA.LL BE SENT BY CERTIFIED OR REGISTERED MAIL AND SHALL BE DEEMED EFFECTIVE THE DATE DELIVERED TO SAID COMPANY AND TO SAID DIRECTOR, AS EVIDENCED BY PROPERLY VALIDATED RETURN RECEIPTS. " Sublessee agrees to deposit with Sublessor and the City of Huntington Beach , at or before the time at which any such policy is required to be in effect , two (2) copies of each policy necessary to satisfy the insurance provisions of this Sublease , and to keep such insurance in effect', and each such policy therefor on deposit with Sublessor , during the entire term of this Sublease . Sublessor retains the right to review and to have the City of Huntington Beach review at any time the coverage , form, and amount of insurance required hereby . If , in the opinion of Sublessor or the City of Huntington Beach, the insurance provisions of this Sublease do not provide adequate protection for Sublessor or the City of Huntington Beach, and for members of the public using the Subleased Premises , Sublessor may require Sublessee to obtain insurance sufficient in coverage , form, and amount to provide adequate protection. Such insurance requirements shall be reasonable but shall be designed to assure protec- tion from and against the kind and extent of the risks which exist at the time a change in insurance is required. Sublessor shall notify Sublessee in writing • of changes in the insurance requirements and , if Sublessee does not deposit copies of acceptable insurance policies -16- t with Sublessor incorporating such changes within sixty (60) days of receipt of such notice , this Sublease shall be in default without further notice to Sublessee . The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed. to limit Sub- lessee ' s liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnifica- tion provisions .and requirements of this Sublease . Notwith- standing said policy or policies' of insurance , Sublessee shall be obligated for the full and total amount of any damage , injury , or loss caused by or resulting from negli- gence or neglect connected with this Sublease or caused by or resulting from use or occupancy of the Subleased Premises . . 18 . Subletting, Encumbering. Any mortgage , pledge , hypothecation, encumbrance , transfer , sub-sublease , sub-subconcession, (hereinafter in this clause referred to collectively as "encumbrance" ) of 'Sublessee 's interest in the Subleased Premises , or any part or portion thereof , shall first be approved in writing by Sublessor and the City of Huntington Beach which. consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any encumbrance which has not been so approved in writing shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Sublease . Occupancy of the Subleased Premises by any prospective encumbrancee before approval of the encumbrance by Sublessor and the City of Huntington Beach shall consti- tute a breach of this Sublease . The term of any encumbrance shall be explicitly set by Sublessee in writing so that no such term shall extend past the term of this Agreement. Every encumbrance shall contain a written prohibition • against holding over by the encumbrancee after the term of this Agreement. -17- Sublessor shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to a merger, consolidation , reorganization or recapitalization of Sublessee if , following such reorgani- zation , the surviving corporation which becomes a party to this Sublease assumes and agrees to perform each of the provisions hereof and provided such succeeding party has at least as much financial and managerial ability to per- form the obligations hereof as does Sublessee prior to such reorganization . The sale or encumbrance of any stock or interest in the Sublessee corporation in an amount sufficient to permit a change of control , by combined vote of minority stockholders or otherwise , shall be deemed an assignment within the meaning of this Sublease . Should Sublessor consent to any encumbrance , such consent shall not constitute s waiver of any of the terms , covenants , or conditions of this Sublease . Such terms , covenants , or conditions shall apply to each and every encumbrance hereunder and shall be severally binding upon each and every encumbrancee or other successor in interest of Sublessee . Any document of encumbrance of the Subleased Premises or any part thereof shall incorporate directly or by reference all of the provisions of this Sub- lease . Sublessor may impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of any consent or approval required by any provision of this Sublease. Sublessor agrees that it will not arbitrarily withhold consent to any encumbrance , .but Sublessor may withhold consent at its sole discretion if any of the follow- ing conditions exist: -18- t A. Reasonable cause exists to believe that the person who is to take an interest in this Sublease under an encumbrance (hereinafter called "encumbrancee") is a poor credit risk , is not financially responsible , or that such prospective encumbrancee may for any other reason not meet its required commitments to Sublessor or to Sublessee , or to the public . B: Sublessee or' any of its successors or assigns is in default of any term, covenant or condition of this Sublease , whether notice of default has or has not been given by Sublessor. C . The prospective encumbrancee has not agreed ift writing to keep, perform, and be bound by all of the terms , covenants , and conditions of this Sublease . D. All the terms , covenants , and conditions of the encumbrance , including the consideration therefor of any kind and every kind , have not been revealed in writing to Sublessor . E. The construction required of sublessee as a condition of this Sublease has not been completed to the satisfaction of Sublessor . F. The processing fee of two hundred fifty d6llars ($250) has not been paid to Sublessor for processing each proposed encumbrance submitted as required by this Sublease. Such processing fee shall be deemed earned by Sublessor when paid and shall not be refundable . G. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions , the proposed Sub-sublessee or Sub-subconcessionaire under a Sub-sublease or Sub-subconcession agreement pertaining to less than all of the Subleased Premises , shall not be required to undertake obligations jointly or severally other than the obligations , terms and conditions of this Sublease which pertain to the operations which are to be conducted under such Sub-sublease or Sub-subconcession agreement. -19- 19 . Assignment Under Trust Deed. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions , if requested by Sublessee , Sublessor agrees to execute its written consent and to request the City of Huntington Beach to execute its written consent to an assignment of- this Sublease to a trustee under a trust deed for the benefit of a lender (herein called beneficiary) , upon and subject to the following covenants and conditions : A. That the trustee , the beneficiary , and the terms of the trust deed are satisfactory to and approved by Sublessor in writing. B. Said trust deed and all rights acquired thereunder shall be subject to each and all of the covenants , conditions , and restrictions set forth in this Sublease and to all rights and interests of Sublessor hereunder , except as herein otherwise provided. C. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Sublease and the provisions of any such trust deed, the provisions of this Sublease shall control. D. Upon and immediately after the recording of a trust deed affecting the Subleased Premises , Sublessee , at Sublessee ' s expense , shall cause to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder , Orange County , California , a written request, executed and acknowledged by Sublessor , for a copy of any notice of default and of any notice of sale under the trust deed as provided by the statutes of the State of California relating thereto . E. At the time of requesting consent to a trust deed, Sublessee shall furnish to Sublessor a complete copy of the trust deed and note to be secured thereby , together with the name and address of the prospective holder thereof . -20- ---.......--- -- - 20 . Cure by Trust Deed Beneficiary of Default ` or Breach. Sublessor agrees that it will not terminate this . Sublease because of a default or breach on the part of Sublessee if the beneficiary under any trust deed to which Sublessor has given its consent , within sixty (60) days after service of written notice on the beneficiary by Sublessor of its intention to terminate this Sublease for such default or breach, shall : A. Cure such default or breach if the same can be cured by the payment or expenditure of money required to be paid under the terms of this Sublease , or if such default or breach is not so curable , to cause the trustee under the trust deed to commence and thereafter to diligently pursue to completion steps and proceedings for the exercise of the power of sale under and pursuant to the trust deed in the manner provided by law; and B. Keep and perform all of the covenants and conditions of this Sublease requiring the payment or expenditure of money by Sublessee until such time as the Subleasehold shall be sold upon foreclosure and pursuant to the trust deed or shall be released or reconveyed thereunder; provided, however , that if the beneficiary shall ftil-or refuse to comply with any or all of the conditions of this paragraph, then and thereupon Sublessor shall be released from its covenant of forbearance . 21 . Transfer of Subleasehold by Foreclosure . The prior written consent of Sublessor shall not be required : A. To a transfer' of the Subleasehold by. foreclosure sale pursuant to a trust .deed , by judicial foreclosure , trustee ' s sale , or by an assignment in lieu of foreclosure; or -21- B. To any subsequent transfer by the bene- ficiary if the beneficiary is an established bank , savings and loan association , or insurance company , and is the pur- chaser at such foreclosure sale. Provided , that in either such event , the beneficiary forthwith gives notice to Sublessor in writing of any such transfer , setting forth the name and address of the transferee , the effective date of such transfer and the express agreement of the transferee assuming and agreeing to perform all of the obligations under this Sublease , and submits to Sublessor a copy of the document by which such transfer was made. 22 . Billboards and Signs. Sublessee agrees that it will not construct nor maintain upon the Subleased Premises any billboards or advertising signs which will be visible from the outside of any buildings on the Subleased Premises except those previously approved in writing by Sublessor and the City of Huntington Beach. 23 . Hold Harmless . Sublessee shall indemnify and save and hold harmless Sublessor , its officers , agents ,. and employees , and the City of Huntington Beach and its officers , agents and employees , from and against any claim, demand, loss , or liability of any kind or nature which Sublessor or the City of Huntington Beach or their respective officers , agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them or any of them for injury to or death of persons or for damage to property , arising out of or in any manner connected with the negligence. or lack of care -or other basis for liability of Sublessee , its • officers , agents or employees in use of the Subleased -22- Premises , or for any cause related to the occupancy or use by Sublessee of the Subleased Premises except negligence or lack of care by Sublessor or the City . The term "indemnify" shall include payment to Sublessor or the City of Huntington Beach of the reasonable value of the services of their respective attorneys in any litigation on any indemnified cause of action brought against Sublessor or the City of Huntington Beach. 24 . Default. Should Sublessee default in the performance of any covenant , condition or agreement contained herein, and should such default not be corrected within the time period , not less than thirty (30) days , specified by Sublessor in a written notice to Sublessee , Sublessor may declare this Sublease and all rights and interests created thereby to be terminated, and upon such termination shall have immediate right of reentry upon such premises and Sublessee shall immediately upon such termination relinquish and give up possession of such premises to Sublessor . In any suit by Sublessor based on breach of the terms of this Sublease , the non-prevailing party shall as a part of any judgment , be liable to the prevailing party for a reasonable attorney fee. Upon such default and termination of this Sublease for Sublessee ' s default , Sublessee agrees , upon written notice by Sublessor , to remove from the Subleased Premises all improvements placed thereon by Sublessee , at Sublessee' s expense. . 25. Continuous Operations. During the entire term or extended term hereof , .commencing with the beginning or the operating period , Sublessee shall continuously , at • reasonable times , operate the Subleased Premises as a skateboard park and for related uses , which shall be open -23- to the public . Failure of Sublessee to do so shall be a default hereunder as referred to in paragraph 24 hereof . While Sublessee shall not have the obligation to pay rent other than according to the provisions of paragraph 3 hereof , Sublessor shall have the right and option to terminate this Sublease upon written notice to Sublessee if' the rentals payable to Sublessor pursuant of paragraph 3 hereof , together with any voluntary payments by Sublessee to Sublessor to avoid termination, less the rentals which Sublessor is obliged to pay to the City pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Skateboard Park Lease is less than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10 ,000. 00) during the first year of the operating period is less than Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15 ,000 .00) during the second year of the operating period , or is less than Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20 ,000 . 00) during the third or any subsequent year of the operating. period . Sublessee may avoid such termination by making payments to Sublessor by making voluntary payments to Sublessor when the rents payable pursuant to paragraph 3 hereof are insufficient to avoid such termination. 26 . Unlawful Use. Sublessee agrees that no improvement shall be erected, placed upon , operated or maintained on the Subleased Premises , nor shall business be conducted or carried on thereon , in violation of the terms of this Sublease , nor of any regulation , order of law, statute , bylaw, or ordinance of any governmental agency having jurisdiction thereover. 27 . Notices . Notices given by Sublessor or Sublessee to the other shall be in writing and shall be • addressed to the appropriate address hereinafter set forth -24- or to such other address as Sublessor or Sublessee may hereafter designate by written notice . To Sublessor: Huntington Central Park Concession Co . 3500 East Coast Highway Corona Del Mar , California 92625 To Sublessee : Universal skate Parks , Inc . 17612 -Beach Boulevard , Suite 18 Huntington Beach, California 92647 28 . Amendments to be in Writing . This Sublease sets forth the entire agreement and understanding of the parties and is not subject to modification except in writing. ' 29 . Excusable Breach. If either party hereto shall be delayed or prevented from the performance of any act required hereunder by reason of an act of God , or other cause which is as a matter of .law beyond the control of the party obligated (financial inability excepted) , performance of such act shall be excused for a period of the delay; and the period for the performance of any such act shall be extended for a period equivalent to the period of such delay. However , nothing in this clause shall excuse Sublessee from the prompt payment of any rental or other charge required of Sublessee , except as may be expressly provided elsewhere in this Sublease . 30 . Partial Invalidity. If any term, covenant , condition, or provision of this Sublease is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid , void , or unenforce- able , the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected , • impaired , or invalidated thereby. -25- 1 31. Waiver of Rights . The failure of Sublessor or Sublessee to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms , covenants , or conditions of this Sublease shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy that Sublessor or Sublessee may have , and shall not be deemed a waiver of the right to require strict performance of any term, covenant, or condition of the Sublease thereafter nor a waiver of any remedy for the subsequent breach or default of any term, covenant , or condition of the Sublease . 32 . Taxes and Assessments . All taxes or assessments which become due and payable upon the Subleased Premises or upon fixtures , equipment , or other property installed or constructed thereon , shall be the full. responsi- bility of` Sublessee , and Sublessee shall cause said taxes and assessments to be paid promptly . Subles.see shall promptly pay all other taxes or contributions or withholdings due to any governmental entity , and shall not become delinquent -in the payment thereof . Sublessee shall have the right to challenge such taxes in the appropriate form. 33 . Eminent Domain. Eminent domain proceedings resulting in a final judgment of condemnation of a part of the Subleased Premises (or in an agreed settlement under threat of condemnation) , which proceedings or settlement leave the remainder of the property useable by Sublessee for the purposes for which the same are subleased , shall not terminate this Sublease. The effect of such condemnation or settlement shall be to terminate the Sublease as to. the portion of the premises condemned, and to leave it in effect as to the remainder of the Subleased Premises . The amount • of rent referred to in paragraph 25 shall in such case be reduced in an amount equivalent to the value of any decrease in usefulness of the premises for the purposes for which subleased. -26- The compensation awarded in an eminent domain proceeding or received in any settlement under threat of condemnation by the taking of the land or improvements and the resulting impairment of this Sublease as to the Subleased Premises or the portion of the Subleased Premises taken shall be allocated between Sublessee and Sublessor , based upon the relative economic value of (a) the Sublease or the portion of the Sublease which is impaired by the taking , and (b) the rental receipts from .the Subleased Premises or from the portion ' of the Subleased Premises taken and the Subleasehold property or portion taken when the value of such property is considered as a remainder at the end of the term of the Sublease. If the City of Huntington Beach is the agency . exercising the power of eminent domain such that the only property interest taken is Sublessee ' s Subleasehold interest, all compensation awarded in the eminent domain proceeding or in any settlement under threat of condemnation shall be the property of Sublessee . 34 . Bankruptcy, Execution Under Judgment, Failure to Pay Debts When Due. Either (a) the appointment of a receiver to take possession of all or substantially all of the assets of Sublessee , or (b) a general assignment by Sublessee for the benefit of creditors , or (c) voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy of Sublessee , or (d), a levy of execution upon any property of Sublessee under any final judgment against Sublessee , or (e) a failure by Sublessee to pay any debt when due , shall constitute a breach of this Sublease and a default hereunder. -27- 35. Destruction of Improvements . In the event of destruction or partial destruction or damage by fire or other casualty of or to any improvement on the Subleased Premises , repairing or rebuilding of such improvement shall be by Sublessor , but Sublessor shall not be ..required to expend on such repairing or rebuilding any amount greater than the fire and casualty insurance proceeds which have been received. The optional termination provisions of paragraph 25 shall not be exercised during the period when such repairs are being made , and the rent amount stated in paragraph 25 hereof shall be reduced proportionately during such period. Upon destruction or damage of improvements to the extent of fifty percent (50%) or more of the value of the total improvements , this Sublease shall be cancelable at the option of Sublessee. 36 . Successors in Interest. Unless otherwise provided in this Sublease , the terms , covenants and conditions contained herein shall apply to and bind the heirs , successors , executors , administrators , and assigns of all the parties hereto , all of whom shall be jointly and severally liable hereunder. 37 . Maintenance. Sublessee agrees to repair and maintain, as reasonable and necessary , all improvements constructed on the Subleased Premises in good order and repair, and to keep the said premises in a neat , clean and orderly condition. This includes , but is not limited to , the prevention of the accumulation of any refuse or waste materials which might be or constitute a fire or health hazard or a public or private nuisance . Sublessee shall not be liable to Sublessor for failure to make reasonable -28- 1 , • l and necessary repairs , or for improper maintenance , until after written notice .from Sublessor ' s representative or from the Director of Recreation and Parks of the City of Huntington Beach of the need of such repair or maintenance . If , however , after what Sublessor or the Director of Recreation and Parks deems a reasonable time , Sublessee fails to make such repair or maintenance , Sublessor may cuase to have such repair and maintenance made and add the cost thereof to the rent thereafter accruing. If said costs are not paid promptly by Sublessee , this Sublease shall be deemed to be in default. This paragraph shall not be construed to require repeated notices by Sublessor or the City of Huntington Beach. Sublessor agrees to enforce its right to have the City of Huntington Beach maintain the park area contiguous to the Subleased Premises and in so doing agrees to use its best efforts to keep said contiguous area in a clean and healthful condition and in a first class state of repair . Sublessor shall enforce its right to have the City of Huntington Beach allow the park to be open to the public during the hours of operation of the facilities operated on the Subleased Premises . • 38 . Inspection. Sublessor and the City of Huntington Beach and their respective authorized represent- ative shall have the right at all reasonable times to .inspect the Subleased Premises to determine compliance with the provisions of this Sublease . 39 . Prices and Quality of Service. Subles.see shall at all times maintain a schedule of the prices charged • for services , equipment and facilities or combinations thereof , -29- supplied to the public on or from the Subleased Premises , whether the same are supplied by Sublessee or by its Sub- sublessees , assignees , Sub-subconcessionaires , permittees , or licensees , and shall make said schedule available to Sublessor and to the Director of Recreation and Parks upon their respective written requests . Said prices shall be fair and reasonable, based upon the following considerations : A. The Subleased Premises are intended to serve a public use and to provide needed facilities to the public at a fair and reasonable cost. B. Sublessee is entitled to a fair and reasonable profit. C. Said prices shall be considered in light of changing economic factors upon notification by Sublessee to City of a change in price schedules . In the event the Director of Recreation and Parks of the City of Huntington Beach notifies Sublessee. and Sublessor that any scheduled price is not fair and reasonable in his opinion and Sublessee does not modify said price as requested by the Director , an appeal will be taken by Sublessor at Sublessee 's written request to the Recreation and Parks Commission , which shall upon notice and hearing determine within thirty (30). days after appeal the price to be charged. Such decision of the commission shall be based on the above considerations and shall be final and conclusive , subject , however , to review by a court of competent jurisdiction to determine whether or not the determination has been made arbitrarily . Pending such appeal , any such price schedule by the Sublessee shall be the maximum charged by Sublessee . -30- 15 F. 1 Before commencing construction or business operations within the Subleased Premises , Sublessee shall propose to Sublessor and to the Director , for their approval , the time of operating schedules and general operating pro- cedures of Sublessee. Said schedules and procedures shall be designed so that all of the services and facilities to be provided under the terms of this Sublease shall be made available to the public to the fullest extent reasonably possible . All changes proposed in said schedules and procedures shall be submitted to the Director for his approval ten (10) days before implementation . In the event the Director or Sublessor does not' approve the proposed schedules and procedures , or change"s therein , Sublessee shall have the right to confer with the Director and with Sublessor and to present reasons for proposing such schedules and procedures . If , after conferring with Sublessee and Sublessor the Director continues to disapprove such proposed schedules and procedures , the Director and Sublessor shall make such changes therein as they seem reasonably proper, and Sublessee shall institute such changes . Sublessee may , however, by written request to Sublessor , request Sublessor to appeal the matter to the Recreation and Parks Commission , whose decision shall be final and conclusive. Sublessee agrees to operate in accordance with the schedules and procedures approved by Sublessor and the Director , or if appealed to the Recreation and Parks Commission, in .accordance with the decision of said Commission. Sublessee' s failure to comply with said schedules and procedures shall be a default hereunder and • cause for immediate termination of this Sublease . -31- i Primary consideration shall be given to the public purpose of the park in implementing this clause . Sublessee agrees that it will operate and manage the services and facilities offered in a competent and efficient manner at least comparable to other well-managed operations of similar type and character . Sublessee shall at all times retain active , qualified , competent, and experienced personnel to supervise Sublessee ' s operation and to represent and act for Sublessee. Sublessee shall. require sub-subtenants and employees to be properly dressed and groomed , clean , courteous , efficient , and neat in appearance at all times . Sublessee shall utilize its best efforts to prevent any person or• persons employed in or about the Subleased Premises from using offensive language or from acting in a loud , boisterous , rude , discourteous , or otherwise improper manner . Sublessee shall maintain a close check over attendants and employees to insure the maintenance of a high standard of service to the public . Sublessee shall replace any employee whose conduct is detrimental to the best interests of the public . 40. Utilities . Sublessee shall construct or dause to be constructed , and pay for all utility lines including sewer , water, gas , telephone and electricity , to the Subleased Premises . Sublessor shall not be required to pay for such construction. Sublessee shall also construct , or cause to be constructed, and shall pay for all utilities within the Subleased Premises . 41 . Sublessee' s Right to Cure Default. In the event that Sublessor shall be in default in some aspect of its Skateboard Park Lease with the City , the Sublessee -32- Y- is not in default under this Sublease , the City by consent hereto , agrees to allow Sublessee to subrogate to the rights of Sublessor to the extent necessary to maintian this Sublease in full force with regard to the Subleased Premises , and in that event , to allow Sublessee the quiet enjoyment of the Subleased Premises while Sublessee is not in default hereunder. 42 . Cessation of Operations . From and after the completion of construction as defined in -paragraph 2A, the skateboard operation must be continuous during the .term of this Sublease and in the event such skateboard operation ceases for any reason for any peripd of sixty (60) t�'�- ��' or Ci t consecutive days , SublessorAmay terminate this Sublease in accordance with procedures set fovth in paragraph 24 . The excusable breach provisions of paragraph 29 of this Sublease shall apply to this paragraph 42 . 43 . Time. Time is of the essence of this Sublease. HUNTINGTOONN CENTRAL P RK CONCSSION COMPANY By President By Secretary SUBLESSOR UNIVERSAL SKATE PARKS , INC. By Pre lid,e ItByQ 1. Secretary SUBLESSEE APPROVED A$ TO FORM -33- DON P. B /� City Atto e� t� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION -III INI INC ION MACH - To Dick Harlow From Jim Palin, Assistant Director Assistant Administrator Planning Department Subject SKATEBOARD ENVIRONMENTAL Date June 3, 1977 DOCUMENTATION Pursuant to your request for information on the requirement for environ- mental documentation for the skateboard park to be constructed within. Central Park, please be advised that the guidelines for the Environmental Quality Act define a project as " . . . a project means the whole of an action which has a potential for resulting in a physical change in the . environment, directly or ultimately, that is any of the following: (3). An activity involving the. issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies. " Pursuant to the Environmental Quality Act it is necessary to have environ- mental documentation prior to review for entitlement and as defined by the guidelines approval " . . . 'in connection with private activities approval occurs upon the earliest commitment to issue or on issuance by a public agency of a discretionary contract, grant, loan or any other forms of financial assistance, lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use of ,a .project." Therefore, it would be necessary for the City Council to review the environmental documents prior to approval of the sublease for the skate- board facility within Central Park. Trust this information will suffice pursuant to your request. :df O q O p C CE VE ,JUN 3 19i7 . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE ty rt" .FRIA N' fs't•4e�e-�t'r�, r� i .fit'„i rti y • 1 its � ��5.,�\ Rl` F T��t • O 810803 ENDORSED FILED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION in the office Ae Secretary of State of the State of California OF MAR 1977 MARCH FONG EU, Seoratary of State UNIVERSAL SKATE PARKS, INC. Janet E. Jouregui Deputy I The name of this corporation is : UNIVERSAL SKATE PARKS, INC. II The purpose of the corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be organ- ized under the General 'Corporation Law of California ("GCL") other than the banking business , the trust company business or the practice of a profession permitted to be incorporated by the California Corporations Code. III The name and address in the State of California of the corporation' s initial agent for the service of process is : Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. , 500 Newport Center Drive, Suite 520 , Newport Beach, California 92663 . IV The corporation is authorized to issue only one class of shares of stock and the total number of shares which the corporation is authorized to issue is one million (1,000 ,000) . Dated this 4th day of March, 1977 . Thomas J. arrack,. Jr. LA ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH L�" INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH 6 1 7 To Mr . F. G . Belsito From Mr. Norm Worthy, Director City Administrator Recreation, Parks and Human Services Subject PROPOSED SKATEBOARD FACILITY Date January 11 , 1977 Olympic Skateboard Park, Inc . through the Huntington Central Park Concession Co . has proposed to construct and operate a skateboard facility on 10 acres of land in Huntington Central Park on the S-E corner of Golden West Street and Talbert Avenue . (Cover letter and Proposal attached) . This proposal has been reviewed by staff, the City Attorney and the Recreation and Parks Commission . In the essence of V saving processing time, recommendations from staff will be orally presented on Monday evening. orm Worthy, Direc or Recreation , Parks and Human Services NW: ac Attachment 3TON CENTRAL PARK CONCESSI-NCO COAST • • ALI • PHONE : 0 0 0 0 O IN HUNTINGTON BEACH CENTRAL PARK D &AS o 17731 GOLDEN W 7NT DE EST STREET 6622 LAKEVIEW STREET PHONE: TON BEACH, CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF. PHONE: (7t4) 848-8893 PIIONE: (714) 848-0888 January 10 , 1977 SUBJECT: Skateboard Park Proposal for Central Park TO: Parks & Recreation Director Persuant to your letter of December 27, 1976 attached is written proposal and draft copy of proposed sub-lease for a skateboard park sub-concession for a skateboard park under our master lease with Olympic Skateparks Inc. (a California corporation to be formed to hold sub-lease of Skateboard Park) . Design concepts and verbal presentation will be given by Olympic Skateboard Park personnel at the Parks & Recreations Commission meeting of Wednesday January 12 , 1977. The sub-lease herewith furnished is a draft only for review and input of various city staff, the commission and our attorney per- suant to drawing a final lease that all can recommend for submission to City Council with presentation at the meeting of Monday January 17 , 1977. We propose that staff, our and sub-concessionarie attorneys meet on Thursday afternoon January 13, 1977 to finalize lease for council meeting. If Design Review Board must approve the conceptual design before the council meeting we will make a presentation on Friday January 14, 1977. Sincerely, v\ y C. Prentice Taylor President Huntington Central Park Concession Co. CPT/cg V 6 .TEMENT OF THE ACTION OF THE CITY COUNC: Council Chamber, City Hall Huntington Beach, California Monday, December 20 .1976____. Mayor Pro Tem ore Pattinson .called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:30 P.M. Present: Bartlett, Coen, Gibbs, Pattinson. Siebert, Shenkman Absent: Wieder ii*iwrwiwi**#ww**i*#rrAAiirAiiiiiAAAAAA#AAiiRARiiR+t#iRAA#ifR*Aii Riti#RiRiriRr##ri r#Riiw CENTRAL PARK MASTER CONCESSIONAIRE LEASE - MEETING TO BE HELD - CA 76-205 The City Clerk presented a communication from the-City Administrator regarding the Hunting- ton Central Park Master Concessionaire Lease. On motion by Gibbs, second Shenkman, Council directed staff to notify Mr. Prentice Taylor, Master Concessionaire, that tennis and skateboard facilities are desired in Central Park. Motion carried unanimously. On motion by Bartlett, second Pattinson, Council directed that members Gibbs, Pattinson and Siebert and appropriate staff, would meet with Mr. Prentice Taylor, Master Concessionaire, . to discuss future development of the park•and make recommendations to the Council regarding possible changes to the lease. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Gibbs,:Shenkman NOES: Siebert ABSENT: Wieder R#Riir*#*i*#i*ii*RfrR*iiRiiiAriRiRAiiitAiAAAiRAAArA if#i1#A*ARiAARiAiiiRAwR#fRiRri wiRii On motion by Gibbs, second Bartlett the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned at 12:45 A.M. to Monday, January 3, 1977•at 5:30 P.M. in the Room B-8 The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Coen, Gibbs, Pattinson, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: None ABSENT: Wieder Alicia'M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City ATTEST: of Huntington Beach, California Alicia M. Wentworth Ron Pattinson j City Clerk Mayor Pro Tempore SPATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Orange ) SS: City of Huntington Beach) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected and qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their regular meeting held on the 20th day of December , 1976 . WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this the 27th day of December , 19 76 , Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California BY f{. 'CI&I-IL 1Ir, LVACL Deputy U L5 II V a CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOV 1 � 1976 J f �a INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON 8FACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE To Mr. F. G. Belsito From Mr. Norm Worthy, Director City Administrator Recreation, Parks and Human Services Subject DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Date November 18 , 1976 HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK .. In response to your attached memo, I submit the following information on the proposed development projects for Hunt- ington Central Park. 1) Additional Lighting - $32, 500 : Shortly after the park was opened in June, 1974 Captain Mike Burkenfield of the H.B . Police Department indicated to me there was not suf- ficient lighting in the park for proper surveillance and recommended that additional lighting units. be added. 2) Additional walk/bikeways , remove water tank - $20, 000 : . T e large grou- nd level water tank 100 yards nort o Tom' s Place on the east side of Golden West Street and related water treatment facilities are no longer used as a part of the city or park water delivery system and the facility which is fenced off from the remainder of the park is an eyesore. This half acre area will be redesigned to be compatible with the surrounding area 1 and provide a surface stream from the city water wells to the coffer dam in Talbert Lake . Additional picnic tables , bicycle racks , and bicycle paths would be added to the nearby vicinity. 3) Construct rustic amphitheatre - $10 000 : This project would e built in the grove of old eucalyptus trees. near the eastern shore of Talbert Lake in Coen Campground. It would be constructed of railroad ties or logs around a small stage and fire ring to accommodate group campers . 4) Construct group picnic shelter @ Huntington Lake - $40 ,000 : A picnic shelter similar to t e one in Mur y Park an related parking area will be constructed near the shore of Huntington Lake (alternate locations will be reviewed and recommended by the Recreation & Parks Commission) to accom- modate large organized groups . 5) Nature Center 'development - $50,000 : Improved access , grading, contouring, additional parking and the creation of an artificial stream are planned to upgrade and enhance the 18 acre Nature Center. (See attached map) 6) Landscape 10 acres west of Golden West - $135 , 000 : Develop- ment of this area in conjunction with a 5 acre tennis complex will complete the landscaping and trail system on the west side of H. C.P . north of Taylor Str� et . (Detail -plans will NW: ac be reviewed and recommended by R & P Commi ' R :r .«.ter== 1 (� m.ew � �''�µ'M__._`` "':z' �i, ��•tea INLAM LAKS a Ado i�� � l' " is / � � .• .�: ,was+ `r _ 1 '� � I • �`' �'r,�:.._.. :gib": :e::.o:;e� I �. G� _ ,no„