Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRECREATIONAL TRAILS - 1970 - 1973 - Bikeway - Equestrian - J KENNETH SAMPSON DIRECTOR ® OUNTY OF 1901 BAYSIDE DRIVE 0 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92662 o RANGE TELEPHONE: 834-4794 AREA CODE 714 HARBORS, BEACHES AND PARKS DISTRICT D C E SEP_2 5 1973 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH September 24, 1973 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Mr. David D. Rowlands, City Administrator C.i.ty ,of Huntington Beach P. 0, Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr, Rowlands: Enclosed is a copy of Board of Supervisors Resolution No, 73-1024 which authorizes matching fund payments to your City for bikeway projects. As stated' i'h the District letter of August 30, this resolution will serve as the legal basis for payment of funds upon project completion. If you have any questions, please direct them to Jim Dukette, at : 834-3870. Yours very truly, HARBORS, BEACHES AND PARKS DISTRICT KENNETH SAMPSON, Director ROBERT F. ABLONSKI Chief of Administration RFY:BH:mph Encl �By CITY COUNCIL zt� TY C 9 ;F --------------- 41 L,�r4�Cfl,CALIF.-' HU??TPIGTO -AM T71 lLe ei Huntington Beach, Calif. April 12, 1971 Honorable Mayor and City Council IIIedil, City of Huntington Beach /310� C_ City Hall Huntington Beach, California Honorable Mayor Shipley and Council Members: As chairman of the Bicycle Paths Committee of the Huntington Beach High School Ecology Club, I am honored to present for your consideration a Petition signed by 1t271 residents of Huntington Beach who feel that our City needs Bikeways and bicycle paths and routes n9w, and that any future General Plan of the City should make provision for bicycles for both recreational and transportation needs of our citizens. The feasibility and the need for bikeways and bike trails has already been studied in depth by your staff and two com- prehensive reports have been prepared on the subject. The first was by the Development Coordinator on November 12, 1970 and the second was for the Public Works and Police Departments in March of this year. Bikeways can be striped onto existing secondary roads and streets for only $7 to $20 per mile. We join your staff in recommending and urging that the Ex- hibit D route, which links Central Park with the City beach and northern residential areas, immediately become Huntington Beach' s first bikeway project. We also feel that long range bikeway-' . ' planning planning in Huntington Beach should be coordi- nated with the bike trails systems that have already been planned by Newport, Costa Mesa, Irvine and Orange County for the harbor area. In conclusion, we think that bicycles are very important. They move people without making smog, and they make riders healthier along the way. Our generation must look to you and your establishment for leadership and for help in matters of vital environmental concern to us. We sincerely and respectfully hope that you do not fail us . Respectfully, ASO-, LISA BENTSON 16642 Melville Circle Huntington Beach, Calif. April I2, 1971 Honorable Paul C. Jones ''=��� r D City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Kk•CH,OLIF, City Hall Huntington Beach, California _A 5 Dear Mr. Jones: There is attached to this letter for the consideration of the Honorable City Council of Huntington Beach: Letter of April 12 requesting Bikeways Petition for Bicycle Paths bearing 19271 signatures. We expect that a large number of residents, many of them high school students, will attend the April 19 City Council meeting to support this request; and for that reason we request that this matter be placed on the City Council agenda so that it will be reached as soon after 7:30 P.M. as possible. We thank you in advance for whatever consideration and priority you can give to us. Respectfully, LISA BENISON �rf. RESOLUTION NO . 3589 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DIRECTING THE PLACEMENT OF A SIGN ON. THE BICYCLE TRAIL AT THE APPROACH TO THE SANTA ANA RIVER BRIDGE WHEREAS , the City of Huntington Beachdesires to cooperate with the State of California and the City of Newport Beach in establishing a safe bicycle trail across the Santa Ana River bridge; and The State of California has granted permission to use certain state parkland as a part of a bicycle trail system upon condition that the City of Huntington Beach erect a sign At the approach to the Santa And River bridge directing bicy- clists to dismount in order to cross such bridge , NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve that the Director of Public Works shall cause a sign to be placed on the bicycle trail at the approach to the Santa Ana River bridge , which sign shall read: BICYCLISTS The law requires you to dismount and walk your bicycle across bridge sidewalk PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of October, 1972 . M or ATTEST: APPROVE AS-0 ORM: City erk City Att ney tr Res. No. 3589 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACII ) I , PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected , qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Iuntington Beach , and ex- officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of October 19 72 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Matney, Duke. Coen . NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None City Clerk and x-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Hjo hnimmental eouflcil CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 TO: Honorable Mayor• and' City Council Members 9 FROM: Margaret Carlberg, Project Coordinator , LeBard Bike Link Committee DATE: June 18 , 1974 SUBJECT: LeBard Bike Trail The Environmental Council wishes to inform you that the LeBard Bike Link Committee has completed the 180 feet plastic-cement bike trail connecting. LeBard Park to the base of the Santa Ana River Levee. The Committee is very appreciative of the advice and assistance from numerous members of the City Public Works Staff. In particular, Mr. Tom Blackburn, who helped the Estancia High School students lay a very professional looking stretch of concrete. The Committee also appreciates the con- tributions from the Meredith Gardens Homeowners Association and the Environmental Council which were sufficient to meet our bills of $616. 00. The County Supervisors are considering Tuesday, June 18 , a request from the Greenbelt Commission to expedite the design and construc-tion of the remaining link to connect the new plastic-cement portion to the Santa Ana River Levee Bike Trail on the top of the Levee. Marga t Carlberg MC:kpm CC: Environmental Council Meredith Gardens Homeowners Association 1 LAID CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 74-26 J,O--" COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Honorable Mayor and From City Administrator City Council Members Subject LEBARD BIKE LINK (AGENDA Date May 15, 1974 ITEM J-1(a) The communication from the,'Environmental Council requesting the City Council to dep6s,it $500 in the "LeBard Bike Link" account to match funds already secured forplastic-concrete trail link between LeBard Park and the bicycle trail on the top of the Santa Ana River levy was deferred from the City Council meeting of May 6, 1974 . This item was deferred in order for the Finance Director to come up with a recommendation where these funds could be provided. It has been determined by the Finance Director that the $500 could be derived from the City' s contingency fund should the City Council decide to contribute the $500 towards this project. Respectfully submitted, David D. Rowlands City Administrator DDR:p l � Environmental Council CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 April 29, 1974 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Environmental Council The Environmental Council has been involved with the collection of plastic materials for the plastic-concrete trail link between LeBard Park and the bicycle trail on the top of the Santa Ana River levee. Some 9 ,000 plastic containers have been collected; they have been ground down and will be combined with other materials to form this trail section. The City' s Public Works Department has coordinated plans with the Orange County Sanitation District, Southern California Edison, the County Flood Control District, the Greenbelt Coordinator and the City's Parks and Recreation Department. The trail will be laid by Estancia High School students. The cost for materials and labor for the substructure (large drain pipe, fill dirt, staking the area, compacting, grading and sterilizing of the soil, and final saw-cutting for expansion joints in the concrete) is estimated at $1, 860. In order to accumulate the funds to pay for the required materials and labor, an account has been opened in the name of "LeBard Bike Link". The recycling of solid waste materials and the development of bike trails have been important interests of the Environmental Council. Therefore the Environmental Council has secured $500 for deposit into this account. The Environmental Council respectfully requests that the City Council match these funds by/ depositing $500 into the account. Carol Schwartz Staff Liaison CS:mc _..--CITY OF HUNTINGTON EACF� INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICAT ON VIJ HUNGTON BEACH To D. Rowlands - From Planning Department City Administrator Subject Status Report Date SeptA 3 Recreational Trails (Land and Water Conservation Grant) By The Planning Department and Department of u_ blic..No.r-ks------ 19........ staff is completing final work on the Land Conservation Grant for Recreational Trails that was awarded to the City early this year. The staff has worked with the Recreational Trails Committee of the Environmental Council , Planning Commission, Recreation and Parks Commission, and Design Review Board in developing the plan. We are now in the process of balancing the cost estimates of the proposed trails with the $138, 000 available through the Grant . Therstaff will be transmitting to City Council a final recommended plan for the expenditure of these funds October 1 , 1973. Zlo ward D. Selich Senior Planner EDS: ja �1 � - 3 STATEMENT OF THE ACTION OF CITY COUNCIL Council Chamber, City Hall Huntington Beach, California June 18, 1973 Mayor Pro Tem called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:00 P.M. Councilmen Present: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Coen, Duke Councilmen Absent: Matney �k�lryt�k�kk*�k�k�k�k�h�k�k�kdrk�k �k�k�Ir9kdF�tr�Ir�kk�k�k�Irllnk��kitk�rAr�k�k�k�k�k��lrh���lr�ir�nk�trdr�k�k�k�kdk CONSENT CALENDAR -(ITEMS APPROVED) On- motion by Gibbs , the following items were approved as recommended by - the following roll call vote: AYES : Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett., Gibbs, Green, Coen, Duke NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Matney . kk ' �ie�nk�rk�rk�e�Ie�ir�hk�k�k�lr�ic�L-�Ifc�nk:k�rkk�c�fr�r�k �ic�r�r �rkk�r:k �nk�r�c�fe�r:k�r�hk�e�r�r*�h�k SANTA ANA RIVER BICYCLE TRAIL Approved plans and specifications for the construction by Orange County Flood Control District of the Santa Ana River Bicycle Trail between Pacific Coast Highway and Atlanta Avenue. and between Edinger Avenue and Katella Avenue; City approval required by the Flood Control Act. On motion by Green the regular meeting of the . City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned at 11:52 .P_M. to Mona_ July_2. 1973 at. 5:00 P.M. in the Administrative Annex The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley. Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Coen, Duke _ NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Matney Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and. ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City ATTEST: - of Huntington Beach, California. Alicia M. -Wentworth Henry H. Duke City Clerk Mayor Pro Tem STATE: OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Orange ) se: City:-of. Huntington.. Beach ) I, .ALICLA M. WENTWORTH, the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Clerk of the . .City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above. and foregoing is:a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said, City at their regular meeting held on the 18th day of, June lg 73 WITNESS .my hand .and.'seal of the said City of. Huntington Beach this the 19th day of. June 19_ 73 City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City.Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California BY Deputy FLAMJ@ CITY 'OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Vp" COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION CA 73-77 HUNTINGTON BEACH To Honorable Mayor and From City Adm' City Council Members '+t�'b Subject BICYCLE SAFETY Date June 28 , 973 „ PETITION REPORT 1 �... The Department of Public Works has prepared a report whic esponds to the various aspects of Mrs . Dell ' s presentation at the last Council meeting. An estimate of cost for three various methods of providing bicycle lanes is shown on Table I in the back of the report . The first and most expensive involves the use of aggregate base material and includes all costs including engineering and contingencies . This method assumes that a contract would be awarded to construct the project. The least expensive in terms of additional funds involves the purchase of material by the City and construction by force account . No labor and equipment charges are reflected in this estimate . The report discusses the various aspects of obtaining funds through the newly created "Bicycle Lane Account. " This program was created by Senate Bill 36 passed by the State Legislature in. 1972 . Details of the program are included in the report. The report implies that a vigorous education and enforcement program can be an effective tool in reducing bicycle accidents . Various statistics are presented to indicate that additional emphasis should be placed in the junior and high school age group. The report suggests that an adopted bicycle route plan should in- clude those areas of high bicycle riding- activity. A special report is being prepared by the staff on the status of the trails element. RECOMMENDATION: 1 . Support an expanded Education and Enforcement Program through the Police Department. Provide additional funds as needed. 2 . Recommend to the High School District that a Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program be incorporated into the Driver Education Program. 3 . Authorize the staff to provide whatever service is needed to implement Items 1 and 2 . 4 . City Council authorize the expenditure of the necessary funds to construct bikeways in accordance with one of the methods listed in Table I of the report. /�aZ_ Page 2 CA 73- 77 June 28 , 1973 RECOMMENDATION: (Continued)_ 5 . Authorize the staff to prepare the necessary reports and certifications in applying for: Bicycle Lane Account Funds . 6 . Upon adoption of a General Plan -for Bicycle Routes , authorize the City Attorney to prepare an"ordinance or resolution establishing bicycle.- lanes and regulations in accordance with provisions of Section 21207 of the California Vehicle Code . Respectfully submitted, David D. Rowlands City Administrator DDR/gbs Attachment REPORT ON BICYCLE SAFETY PETITION June 27 , 1973 During the Council meeting of June 18, 1973, the staff was directed to prepare a report relating to the contents of the petition which was presented by Mrs. Dell. Councilman Green suggested investi- gating the use of Motor Vehicle funds to assist in defraying the costs of this system. Table I is a summary of the costs to provide separate bicycle trails or marked lanes as described on the petition. The first column under estimated cost represents the cost if the work were to be accom- plished by a contractor under normal bidding practices. This alternate calls for a structural section of 3" asphalt concrete over 6" of aggregate base and is adequate to support maintenance vehicles. The second column is the cost with the aggregate base removed. The 2" of asphalt concrete would rest on native soil and be similar to other. walkways within the City. The third alternate is an estimate of cost assuming that no labor and equipment costs would be applied to the project. This assumes that City forces would be used for the construction and that only the cost of material is• considered. The cost of engineering and provisions for contingencies are applied only to the estimate for contract. Senate Bill 36, 1972, passed by the California Legislature established the Bicycle Lane Account. The State Department of Public Works has adopted rules and regulations for the administration of this account. Applications for funds must contain the following certifications : 3 1. That the project requested is or will be part of the jurisdiction' s General Plan for Bicycle Lanes . 2. That the jurisdiction has sufficient funds to construct and maintain the requested project. This includes a statement that federal funding of a certain percentage has been obtained or, in lieu of federal funding, that the local jurisdiction has 1/3 of the estimated pro- ject cost available. 3. That the requested project improve the safety and/or capacity of -the city street or county road. Briefly describe reasons for .this con- clusion. In the event the amount of funding needed exceeds the available funds for any fiscal year, the following is the method of assigning priorities . r 1. First, to projects having a minimum of 50% federal participation in the project cost, and of these, in the following order of priority: a. To projects where the bicycle facility and the roadway are separated. b. To projects where the shoulder is widened and signed and striped for bicycles. c-. To all other projects not covered by (a) or (b) . 2. Second, to projects having less than 50% federal participation in the project cost, and of these projects , in the same order of priority as specified for subdivision (1) . 3. Third, to projects with no federal funds, and of these projects, in the same order of priority as specified for subdivision (1) . The State Department of Public Works will consider any project nominated by a city or county to be eligible for an allocation. from the Bicycle Lane Account if an application is received by the Department on or before December 1 preceding the calendar year in which construction of the project is to commence. Application for this source of funds can be accomplished during the coming months. . The staff is currently administering a project funded under the provisions of the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund .Act and regulated by the State Department of Parks and Recreation. The project is called Phase I and is expected to cost approximately $140, 000 of which 50% is Federally funded. Final plans and specifications are being prepared at this time. A portion of the work shown on the table is scheduled under Phase I . In discussing bicycle safety in general, there are several factors that should be emphasized. First, in the three fatal accidents involving bicycles this year, the individual riding the bicycle had violated one or more sections of the Vehicle Code immediately prior to the collision. Second, in none of the cases was the driver- of the vehicle held or cited. Third, since June 1, 1972, there have been 132 bicycle accidents . of the total, 112 accidents or 85% indicated that the bicyclist .was the violator. The remaining 15% of the accidents indicated a violation by both parties or the motorist or undetermined violators. Fourth, studies show that the 11-15 (inclusive) age group is the group having the highest incidence of accidents. The 16-20 age group is a close second, and the 6-10 age. group is third. However, there is no information as to the absolute number of bicyclists in each age group. Studies have shown that a strong education and enforcement program has the greatest impact on reducing bicycle accidents. In addition, there are long term benefits which result in a new generation of motorists -2- who are better equipped to handle the faster pace of living. These motor- ists have a better attitude towards vehicle laws and enforcement procedures as a result of the education and enforcement program. At this point, we may wish to add a third "E" to bicycle safety. Education, , Enforcement and Engineering working together can provide a higher degree of bicycle safety. Recommendations : 1. Support an expanded Education and Enforcement program through the Police Department. Provide additional funds as needed. 2. Recommend to the High School District that a Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program be incorporated into the Driver Education Program. 3. Authorize the staff to provide whatever service is needed to imple- ment Items 1 and 2 . 4. City Council authorize the expenditure of the necessary funds to construct bikeways in accordance to one of the methods listed in Table I of the report. 5. Authorize the staff to prepare the necessary reports and certifica- tions in applying for Bicycle Lane Account Funds. G. Upon adoption of a General Plan for Bicycle Routes, authorize the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance or resolution establishing bicycle lanes and regulations in accordance with provisions of Section 21207 of the California Vehicle Code. TABLE 1 EST/MA TED CONSTRUCT/ON COST !✓M?6 . M/NU3 MAT'L. STREET L/M/TS FEET COA(reACT d OMLY REMARKS M.4//V Sr TO MANS/ON Al VE UNDER /ST Pf/,48E /7Ty /,097 5,047.00 4,/5100 96B.00 B/XE GRAM" R4C/F/C COAST NWY TV GOLDEN lNESl ST. /9, 7/4 �55,229. 00 B/, 465 00 Q, 534.00 NORN,�4 QR A4C/F/C-CQ4ST 11wY 70 4 B' UNOFR /ST.ohG4SE /7Th! .ST LAK€.ST 9, S/B eo,44100 .14,./69.-00 .e,,O.Q/.00 B/kE OQAIVr ZAi-E:Sr "70 /7TfN ST GARF/ELO 4, 17Z 19, 006. ®3,.OZ6.00 �4,039.00 /77H ST. TO 'P 'P YORI OWN.AVE. LgE,gCN:BLt/D. Z;%90 /O, 97e.00 .8, 774.00 Z,3a9 00 All ' TOTAL 361 99/ . //O, 70100, 81,585.00- Z/,33/00 e7, /979 S.Y. # Ho N CITY OF HUNTINGTON 13K=FO INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH • To David D. Rowlands From Director of Public Works City Administrator Subject Bicycle Safety Petition Date June 25, 1973 Please be advised that Public Works Department - is proceeding with plans. and estimates to take care of the problems cited in the petition. We will be. ready- to report on July 2. A report on the status of the whole Trails Plan should come from Planning Department. They have the '. responsibility of preparing the plan as part of the Master Plan of Trails. C7es R. Whee r Director of Public Works JRW:ae . cc: Planning Department' D E � CDdt D JUN 2.5 1973 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE REFERRED f HUNTINOTON BEACH HIGH SCHOOL a BY COUNCIL � 7 i� 1905 MAIN STREET, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORN CI 2 .914 ?!. ......:....... :::::.....;.::. U C-A_S E d. D. CITY CLFRKn c i`=p a i,�`. . CHRIS GILISSEN 11UNTIHGTC' CE". CaLll`: VERN VALLERCAMP Assistant Principal Assistant Principal Research and Development School and Community Affairs PATRICIA A. PEREZ (11�� �~ �1 R�1 I1 DARRELL STILLWAGON Assistant Principal 33 Guidance and Counseling Coordinator of Activities To: Huntington Beach City Council From: Huntington Beach High School Oiler Community Council Date: May 31, 1973 Subject: Bicycle Safety Attached please find petitions signed by residents requesting investigation of bicycle access routes to Huntington Beach High School. We are particularly concerned with the lack of traffic signals and/or bicycle lanes on: Yorktown, Seventeenth, Mansion, Goldenwest, Edwards, and Main Streets. Attention to this problem at the earliest moment may prevent. another tragedy such as the death of a student in March related to a bicycle accident. Please direct any questions or information to Mrs. Mary Alice Dell, Safety Chairman, 19202.Sherborne, Huntington Beach, CA 92646, (714) 968-6229. LL:hp cc: Larry Lucas, Principal Don MacAllister, President Roy Howe, President-Elect Mary Alice Dell, Safety Chairman F HUNTINGTON BEACH UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BIKEWAY RESOLUTION v WHEREAS, the Recreation and Parks Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California wish to encourage more local citizens to .ride bicycles for exercise, recreation and transportation, and WHEREAS, our community, county, state, and nation all lack the proper bikeways and bike trails to safely allow our citizens to participate in bike riding programs, now THEREFORE BF IT RESOLVED, that the Recreation and Parks Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, hereby supports Senate Bill 502 as federal legislation is mandatory to assure funding for state and local authorities to provide a well planned, integrated, na- tion-wide bikeway system. Respectfully submitted, Norm Worthy, Secre ary Huntington Beach Recreation and Parks Commission Copies To : House Conferees : Senate Conferees : John A. Blatnik (Dem. ) Jennings Randolph (Dem. ) John C . Kluczynski (Dem. ) Edmund S. Muskie (Dem, ) Jim Wright (Dem. ) Lloyd Bentsen (Dem. ) Harold T. Johnson (Dem. ) Joseph Montoya (Dem. ) James V. Stanton (Dem. ) Howard Baker (Rep. ) William H. Harsha (Rep. ) James Buckley (Rep. ) James C . Cleveland (Rep. ) Robert Stafford (Rep. ) Don H. Clausen (Rep. ) M.G. Snyder (Rep . ) H.B. City Council and City Administrator Orange County Board of Supervisors Craig Hosmer, Congressman, 32nd District Richard Hanna, Congressman, 34th District Dennis E. Carpenter, Senator, 34th District Robert H. Burke, Assemblyman, 70th District Recreation and Parks Commission a � t H CITY OF HUNTINCTON BEACH INTER:DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To David D. Rowlands, City Administrator From Planning Department Attn: Bud Belsito, Executive Assistant Subject Recreational Trails, Phase I Date October 1, 1973 Submitted herein is the .report entitled Recreational Trails Phase I. The report is the culmination of efforts by the Planning Department, Department of Public Works, Recreation and Parks Department, and the Recreational Trails Committee of the Environmental Council to develop a plan for the expenditure of the Land and Water Conservation grant monies awarded to the City for first phase development of recreational trails. Work on the plan began in March of this year. Many meetings were held between the participants along with presentations to the Planning Commission, Recreation and Parks Commission, and Design Review Board. The plan, as presented, contains the following recommendations: Bicycle Trails 23 miles @ $129,000 and an Ordinance to be.effective upon completion of the trails. ' Jogging Trails 5 miles @ $2,000 Equestrian Trails Reserve $7,000 for future recommendation from a 90 day equestrian use study. -Tn addition, the .report addresses other recreational trails programs and staff activities in order to place them in perspective. Upon acceptance by City Council the staff can .then proceed with the implementation of.the plan as outlined in Section 5 of the report. ard D. -elich i Senior Planner EDS:ja Attachment CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH r U COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION CA 73- 70 HUNTINGTON BEACH To Honorable Mayor and From City Administrator City Council Members Subject TRAILS STATUS REPORT Date June 8 , 1973 The following is a report on the status of the City trails system. This report was requested by the City Council at the May 21 , 1973 meeting. Last fall a matching grant from the State Land ' and Water Conservation Fund for $69 ,000 was approved for the City of Huntington Beach . The preliminary plans for the trails system included 60 miles of bikeways , 60 miles of footpaths , and 12 miles of equestrian routes . To date , the construction drawings and specifications for the bicycle routes are 75% complete. The equestrian trail plans and specifications are 50% complete . The footpath and jogging trail plans and specifications are approximately 90% complete. Two recent applications were made for County Revenue Sharing for additions to the bicycle trail system- -one for $17, 50.0 , the other for $70 ,000 . Both were eliminated from the County revenue sharing priorities because funds are available through other sources . The City is , therefore , re-evaluating the proposed additions to the approved trail system` and will be submitting a new application for matching funds to the Orange County Bicycle Trail Fund and the Santa Ana River Greenbelt Trail Fund. The County of Orange has approved plans to extend the bicycle trail on the bank of the Santa Ana River from Atlanta Street south across the Talbert Flood Control Channel then west along the south bank of the channel to Brookhurst Street . Mr. Harold Munn, of the State Division of Highways , is studying the feasibility of widening the Pacific Coast Highway bridge over the Santa Ana River for bicycles by cantilevering out on the ocean side of the bridge . A full status report on the trail system will be prepared .for City Council for the first meeting in July. Respectfully submitted, David D. Rowlands City Administrator DDR:eh t I Police Department .public Works 'Director To Planning Director Dare 6/19/73 RE: Bicycle Safety Petition r - The' City Council directed the staff to Of ticycle, equestrian and pedestrian paths g �sz-r'accg'r�$l��the—crcy. . This—rep e-r--c-3h9i-2ad incorporate the overall system of bicycle highways throughout the city. Councilman Ifteert suggested investigating the use of Motor vehicle Funds, to assist in defraying the costs of this vysten. Pte-ase have this formation available for the City Council meeting of July 2, 1973. This item will be coordinated by the Public Works Director. RETURN 70 Signed David D. Rowlands* City Administrator DDR/gbs cc:. City Clerk Via,. Date- Signed R dif9►m. SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT. 4S 465 ... PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. - - -- -• - - -= `-�'-'>'- Dated$ Public vio'rks Dix-act t , pany subgj it fho + + - 5 : 'Please +ci %bsam MURN 0 —'� Signed .!e- r rt 'i city C14Tk Date Signed Ridif9rm SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT. 4S 465 PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. EACH C& OF HUNTINGTON ADMINISTRATIVE COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH Honorable Mayor and City Council Members To Recreation and Parks From Tom Severns , Director of Commission Environmental Resources David D. Rowlands , City Norm Worthy, Director of Subject . Administrator Dete Recreation and Parks PROPOSED EQUESTRIAN CENTER February 8, 1973 The staff has been working with several equestrian groups during the past year to locate two centers along the Santa Ana River as delineated in the City's Trails Element Preliminary Plan. The Commission received one proposal (for information purposes) on January loth which failed to be accompanied by a staff recommendation due to its deficiencies . Transmitted with this letter is a "Proposal- for a Full Service Equine Recreation Center" authored by Mr. and Mrs . R. L. MacGregor. In preliminary staff reviews of this document, it was determined that this document is of the quality that would prove an asset to the equestrian as well as to the- commuhity. . The MacGregors have made a very comprehensive proposal including price schedules and facilities proposed. They have not quoted returns to the City. In this respect, we are not seeking profit but only enough to cover the terms of a lease and provision of a service. The City will be the sponsoring agent or master lessee with the County Sanitation District on their property adjacent to the mouth of the Santa Ana River. Recommendation Authorize staff to negotiate a proposed .lease with the Sanitation District and the MacGregors . Such proposed lease to be returned to the Commission at the March meeting for recommendation and approval . Tom Severns TS :eh Enclosure : Proposal for equestrian center0 �b •: r ti Proposal for a Full-Service Equine Recreation Center Submitted to Department of Parks and Recreation City of Huntington Beach California by R. L. and S. W. MacGregor 6132 Softwir_d Drive Huntington Beach f This proposal is submitted to the Huntington Beach Department of Parks and Recreation to describe a full-service equestrian recreational center on O.C.S.D. property leased or subleased through the City of Huntington. Beach. This document is to delineate the proposed facilities, services, property utilization, provided equipment, operating plan., and the time period of :Urplezrentation. The equestrian recreational center (ERC) is proposed to be a park- like facility implemented in stages on property owned by the Orange County Sanitation District located between Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana -River bounded on the north by the Banning Street easement. The total facility is to be situated on approximately 29 acres in a low density manner to provide. for grassed areas between rows of stalls, barns, building;, and around riding rings. In addition, landscape trees will be added to furt:.er eahance the park atmosphere. These grass areas and trees will aid the perimeter trees and shrubs in reducing dust generated. General riding paths and lanes will be surfaced with decomposed granite, wood shavings, and/or shredded eucalyptus bark and leaves. Riding will not be permitted on grassed areas, however, horses may be grazed in these open areas when accompanied by a handler. . As the total area is not to be used for equine housing facilities initially, a limited area will be used for improved pasture and paddocks that will be available to current equine boarders. The entire facility is to be bounded by horse-proof fencing with the main entrance from the Banning Street easement. Access to the Santa Ana River will be via the same exit and east on the Banning Street easement.. Figure 1 shows the proposed property location and shape. Figures 2 and 3 d__zz be two general plot plans far the proposed ERC. Page 2 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor A. Operating Philosophy: The one and only purpose of the L•PC is to provide a full-service facility for the use of private citizens interested in equine activities, while operated at a profit to the lessee. The lessee has experience in stable management, has made economic and cost studies, and has personally investigated the market for this service. The results of these efforts and experience demonstrate that such an ERC can be operated at a reasonable profit, while providing desired services and operating under strict rules in a businesslike manner. This proposal is based o:i .the following operating philosophy. Today there is a high demand for a first-class equine facility, and the present economy can afford such facilities. This is demonstrated by the success of similar facilities at Diamond Bar and at Cota de Coza. The area is to provide a pleasant, enjoyable environment for those boarding horses, receiving instruction, or active in equine activities. Emphasis is to be placed upon the excellent ( condition and beauty of the facility. Materials, facilities and grcunds are to be established and maintained on this basis. Page 3 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor 1.0 Facilities: During the development of. the ERC, facilities will be expanded according to this detailed plan. At projected completion, the ERC will accommodate up to 240 boarded horses. One of two general groups of construction materials are proposed. One group would be...as portable as possible; .-the other group would consist of more permanent structures. . The decision as to which type of materials" to be used would , be determined by economic feasibility and in agreement with the desires of the Department o" Parks and Recreation, the O.C.S.D. , and the lessee. These facilities will be composed of semicovered exterior stalls, box or barn stalls, a small number of larger paddocks, limited pasture, lounging or bull rings, exercise rings, riding rings, a large show ring, parking, manager's office and.classroom building, veterinary and farriers buildings, ERC clubhouse, restrocros, equipment storage buildings, wash racks,. feed storage, -manure removal system, and a perimeter trail/jump course. Each of these facilities is described in detail below. 1.1 Exterior Stalls; Eight rows of portable pipe stalls are proposed. Each row will contain 24 stalls. These stalls will be constructed cf 1 7/8" steel pipe, factory welded, with 6 ho r;aontal rails reaching a height of 6 feet, produced. by Allen Fence Company, Southwest Manufacturing Company, or some comparable firm. Page 4 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor Each stall will have shelter, automatic water, a hay- rack and manger unit, . a number plate, and a message plate. Each boarder will be supplied with a tack box contairin a saddle rack, and a hitching post. Such a facility unit is shown in Figure 4. The alternate, more permanent configura- tion is shovm in Figure 4A. 1.2 Permanent Box Stalls : Six rows of box stalls are proposed. Each row will contain 12 stalls. These tuildings will have concrete footings, cinderblock exterior walls, cinderblock interior walls to a height of 4 feet with metal rails set vertically above that height. Conventional roofing will be used. Eaeb stall and boarder will have the same equipment as described in paragraph 1.1. Such a facility unit is shown- in Figure 5. 1.2.1 Portable Barn Stalls: Four portable barns are proposed. Each barn will car_tair: 16 box stalls. These buildings will be constructed of all steel 'material on the exterior, and wood and metal materials on the interior, as produced by Port-A-Stall Corporation, Cuckler Building Systems, E-.--aer Farmsted, or some cer_parable company. Each stall-and boarder will have the same equipment as described in paragraph 1.1. Such a barn is shown in Figure 6. 1.3 Isolation Paddocks: Two isolation box stalls and paddocks, and one observaticc box stall and veterinary room will be provided. Each stf-= will have automatic water, a hayrack and manger ucit, ar::: uill be ::onrected to the manager's home through . .n:+:.ice:e,,,•y.w. n. _....s.a. Page 5 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor an internal ERC communications system and/or remote T.V. The two paddocks will be constructed of steel pipe and horse-proof fencing. This facility is shown in Figure 7. 1.4 Limited Pasture: Three pastures will be provided. Each pasture will be. constructed of steel pipe and horse-proof fencing, and will CCIntair. sufficient and proper shelter and feeding facilities. The pasture will be managed and farmed in crops meeting the standards suggested by the University of California Extension Service. 1.5 ..Wash Racks: A sufficient number of wash racks will be constructed of ce crete and steel pipe. These will be built in units of two, and will have adequate water and drainage facilities. Refer to Figures 4 and 5. 1.6 Lounging Rings: Eight or more lounging rings or bullpens, 30 feet in diameter, will be provided. These will be constructed of sturdy, solid wood or of cinderblock, to a height of 6 feet. Refer to Figures 4 and 5. 1.7 Transient Stalls and Parking: Twenty-four stalls will be provided for transient horses. These stalls will be equipped with shelter, automatic water, and a hayrack and manger unit. Parking will. also be provided for transient trailers. 1.8 Exercise Rings: Four exercise rings will be provided, each approxi- =-tely 80 feet by 130 feet, with sprinklers, lights, and one gate. These rings will be constructed of 4 x 6 wooden posts, 2 x 6 horizontal boards, and topped by 2 x 6 boards laid parallel to the ground. Refer to Figures 2 and 3. Page 6 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor 1.9 Riding Arenas: Two riding rings, each 150 feet by 230 feet, will be constructed in a manner similar to the exercise rings described above. . These. .rings will be provided with lights, sprinklers, and two gates. One ring will be equipped with a variety of jumps and cavaletti used by English-style riders, and the other ring will be equip.ped. with barrels, poles, and trail obstacles used by Western-style riders. 1.10 Show Ring: One show ring will be built of a size 2.40 feet by 450 feet. Lighting and water will be provided. The ground inside and around the outside perimeter would be covered .with a good height of grass. On one side of the ring will be bleachers for an audience. On the opposite side will be a _. two-level building, 12 feet by 18 feet, of which the lower floor will be used for a judges and show managers office, and the upper floor will contain the announcers stand. and. loudspeaker controls. Loudspeakers will be properly placed about the ERC. There will be. two fences making up the ring; one to keep the horses in, and one to separate the audience from the horses by a fixed distance. There will be two gates; one for entrance and one for exit. Sufficient area near these gates and the ring will be provided to accommodate the contestants. Separate, additional equipment will be provided for the show ring, such as jumps, trail obstacles, a calf pen for cutting classes, etc. This ring will be constructed in a manner similar to .that described in para- graph 1.8. The show ring will be used only for showing. Page 7 of 23 Proposal by fir. and Mrs. MacGregor 1.11 Parking: Adequate parking facilities will be provided for at least 260 cars and 92 car-and-trailer units. 1.12 Material Storage Storage sheds, buildings, or bins will be provided to accommodate 24 tons of hay, 8 .tons of bedding material, 4 tons of grain, and 15 cubic yards of clay, dirt or decomposed granite. These buildings will all be easily accessible to the road. Grain mixing equipment may also be provided. 1.13 Manure Removal: Dumpsters will be provided to contain manure in a relatively isolated area, or a manure reducing system will be provided. 1.14 Office: A building containing 2 offices, 1 lounge, 2 restreoms, 1 . classroom, and 1 porch will be constructed. This building --- will also contain vending machines and be connected to the ERC intercommunications system:. The lounge will be con- verted to the show office when required. 1.15 Veterinary Facility: A building or shed will be provided for veterinary services. 1.16 Farrier Facilities: A building or shed will be provided for farrier services. This will include fire control equipment, electricity, lights, water, a hitching post, and a parking and working area. 1.17 ERC Clubhouse: A clubhouse, with restrooms, vending machines, a barbeque facility, and a picnic area will be constructed, landscaped, and surrounded by a hitching post, or fences. 1.18 Restrooms: Restrooms will be conveniently located within the ERC. 1.19 Rouse: A hone fo-r the manager will be constructed; either a portable Page 8 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor house trailer, or a more permanent structure. 1.20 Equipment Storage: Several storage buildings will be provided, to house large equipment, small equipment, show ring equipment, and to provide area for a wood, metal, and leather workshop. 1.21 Trail/Jump Course: A perimeter trail or jump .course, 15 feet to.25 feet wide may be provided. 1.22 . Landscaping: w'hever possible and reasonable, the ground surface will be covered with pleasant vegetation, adequately maintained. 1.23 Utilities: The ERC will be provided with electricity to. all buildings and working areas, well lighted, and with sufficient water and sewage facilities. All buildings will contain fire control equipment and/or overhead sprinklers. Public - telephones will be provided about the ERC. A private ERC intercommunications system will be provided for use of the manager. 1.24 Fencing: The perimeter of the ERC will be fenced with horse-proof fencing and will have one or two. gates.. Page 9 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs.. MacGregor 2.0 Services: The proposed ERC will provide a full service facility to those interested in equine activities. Western and English- style riding instruction, school horses, and horse training, will be available. All horses boarded at the ERC will be fed 20 pounds of fresh alfalfa and/or timothy hay in two daily feedings and new bedd.in3 .will be provided .for horses in box or barn stalls. The graded level of stalls will be maintained by the use of clay, sand; dirt, or decomposed granite furnished by the ERC. Riding paths in the stable area will be maintained with the same materials. Sprinkler systems will be installed in grass areas. The sprinkler risers will extend .well above ground level (approximately --- 4 feet) and will be rigidly mounted to large posts. Generally, bushes will be planted around these posts to add to the general landscape beauty. Nash racks located throughout the ERC will be provided with drainage so as to allow the wash water to be dispersed as subterranean irrigation of immediate grass areas. Other ERC facilities will include public restrooms, telephones, covered rest areas, and limited food vending machines. The ERC lessee will sponsor English and Western Horse Shows and Performance events. In addition, the ERC will allow the use of show facilities to other non-profit equine and 4H oranizat-lors for similar purposes on a cost basis. At this time, the plan to operatic concessions at these Page 10 of 23 Propo:aal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor events is to allow charitable or community organizations to operate them as a community service. Each of these services will be described in detail below. 2.1 Boarding in Pipe Stalls: Each horse will be given up to 20 pounds of fresh alfalfa hay daily, in two feedings, morning and evening. -The stall will be cleaned daily, and the ground level and drainage flow will be maintained. 2.2 Boarding in Barn or Box Stalls: Each horse will be given up to 20 pounds of fresh alfalfa or .timothy hay daily, in two feedings. The stall will be cleaned dail, and clean bedding will be added as required.. The floor will be properly m?intaired. 2.3 Grain:-- Additional feeding of grains will be available. 2.4 Pasture Boarding: Pasture boarding will be available for horses those owners are on extended vacation, horses which must be laid up for veterinary reasons, horses being rested, or horses too young.to be worked. 2.5 Isolation Facilities: Facilities will be available for horses which must be under constant observation, which must be completely isolated, or for wares who are in the process of foaling. First—aid services will be available to these horses at all times, by tae ERC. 2.6 Veterinary and Farrier cervices: Suitable veterinary and farrier services will be organized by the ERC. Each equine owner will have a message plate. Bulletin boards will be available for information dispersal in office, clubhouse, Page 11 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor and barns. . Services will be arranged in a periodic or emergency method in response to these messages. 2.7 Clubhouse: A clubhouse, with restrooms, etc. , and lounge, will be available to all current boarders. $arbeques and club activities will be sponsored by the ERC. . 2.8 Transients: Those horse owners coming to the Santa. Ana:River trails will have available to them boa-:ding facilities for one night, and parking space. These will be supplied at no cost, as a community service as partial rental payments made to the City. . Feed will be supplied, when available, at cost. 2.9 Security: In addition to the perimeter-fencing .and gates, locks for - - stalls and tack boxes will be available at cost from the ERC. These locks will be maintained with a master key kept by the ERC for emergencies. 2.10 Trail/Jurp Course: With permission of .the ERC, each rider will have use of the perimeter trail/jump course. 2.11 School Horses: Up to 16 school horses, their tack, lounging equipment, class equipment, training equipment, grooming equipment, veterinary supplies, and level of training will be maintained by the ERC. These school horses nay include 2 beginner ponies, 4 beginner horses, S intermediate- beginner horses, 3 advanced-beginner horses, and 2 inter- mediate 'rorses. 2.12 Instruction_: Group or private instruction for nonhorse. owners or horse owners will be available. A variety of classes will be Page 12 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor offered which may include: a. Care and Safety - a class oriented toward owners of their first horse, or those having no equine experience. b. Beginning Equitation c. Intermediate-Beginning Equitation.. d. Advanced-Beginning Equitation e. Intermediate Equitation f. Beginning Jumping Equitation g. Equine Anatomy and Health Practices h. Raising a Young Horse i. Instruction for the Handicapped J . Classes sponsored by the Department of Parks and - - Recreation 2.13 Instruction: Group or private instruction for horse owners will be available. A variety of classes will be offered which may include: a. Horsemanship b. Handling and Ground Training c. Beginning Trail Horse d. Begimiing Cutting Horse e. Intermediate Jumping Equitation f. Beginning Equitation, Saddle-Seat g. Intermediate Trail Horse h. Intermediate Cutting Horse i. Irte:-mediate Equitation, Saddle-Seat j . Advanced Equitation, Hunt-Seat Page 13 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor -- k. Advanced Trail Horse 1. Advanced Cutting Horse m. Advanced Equitation, Saddle-Seat n. Beginning Training o. Intermediate Training p. Jumping Training q. Beginning Dressage Training r. Instruction and Training for Mounted Police s. Beginning Vaulting t. Classes in Driving will be offered, .i.f and. when trails suitable for such use are available. 2.14 Activities: A variety of equestrian activities will be sponsored by the ERC. These may include: . a. Group rides near the ERC. b. Group rides requiring trailering. c. Overnight rides, which may or may not require trailering. d. Shows, game meets, training shows, gymkhana meets, etc. e. Club affiliations such as: 1. The Jr. Mounted Cavalry, whose goals are enjoying riding, troop training, and equine care. 2. The International Pony Club, which provides a pool . of equestrians who may, hopefully, become Olympic contestants. 3. A 4H Unit, whose goals are equine care and health practices, breeding, and enjoying riding. 4. A Polo Team, to enjoy playing cowboy polo. Page 14 of -3 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor 5. An E.T.I. Corral, whose goals are community enjoyment and trail riding. 6. An International Vaulting Association unit, whose goals are the training of mounted gymnasts. 7. A Jr. Hunt Club., whose goals are to hunt. 2.15 Training: :The: ERC will provide training .,ervices, and programs, for show training. A dummy trailer will be available to boarders, at no cost. Video-taping equipment may be used in classes. 2.16 Trailering: For those owners who do not have trailers, the ERC will provide a trailering service. 2.17 Buying and Selling: The ERC will act as. a private agent for buying or -.-.---- selling horses, or will give all the aid or advice desired. Page 15 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor 3.0 Implementation Plan and Schedule: As previously stated, the. ERC is to i be implemented over an. extended time in increments. This is proposed to provide facilities as required, installed in a planned, orderly manner, resulting in a fully utilized park-like setting. The implementation plan and schedule are to be a flexible guide for achieving the proposed -ERC. layout. Prior to initiating subsequent steps, the ERC lessee will notify the Huntington Beach Department of Parks and Recreation and obtain necessary perrits. The proposed implementation plan and schedule are listed below. Each subsequent step will be begun only after the facilities created in the previous step are approaching full utiliza- tion, and/or as profit structure allows. . 3.1 The first step will be general grading of property, perimeter fencing, 2 rows of outside stalls, 1 riding arena, l exercise ring, i 2 lounging rings, .2 wash racks, 1 manure dumpster, 1 parking area, 1 office building, 1 manager's home, 1 road, and 1 pasture. This construction will be completed in six (6) months. 3.2 The second step will add 1 row of outside stalls, 1 barn or row of box stalls, 1 exercise ring, 2 lounging rings, 2 wash racks, 1 bedding bin or shed, 1 isolation facility, and 1 pasture. This construction will be completed within four (4) months after initiating. 3.3 The third step will a_d 1 row of outside stalls, 1 barn or box stall row, 2 equipment storage buildings, 1 ha-- storage shed or Page 16 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor building, 1 feed storage bin or shed and mixing equipment. This will be completed within four (4) months after initiation. 3.4 The fourth step will add 1 row of outside stalls, 1 barn or row of box stells, 1 riding arena, 2 lounging rings, 2 wash racks, I_-veterinary facility, 1 farrier facility. This construc- tion will be completed in three (3) months after initiation. 3.5 The fifth step will add 1 row of outside stalls, 1 barn or row of box stalls, 1 exercise ring, 1 storage bin or shed for clay, dirt, decomposed granite, or shredded material. This construction will be completed in two (2) months after initiation.. 3.6 The sixth step will add 2 rows of outside stalls (2 rows of box stalls) , 1 exercise ring, 2 lounging rings, 2 wash racks, 1 clubhouse and picnic area, 1 transient horse and trailer facility, I. parking area, and l pasture. The construction will be ca mpleted within six (6) months after initiation. 3.7 The show rin , anrouncers building, bleachers, and related facilities, ani the perimeter trail and jump course are optional items to be added when necessary at the convenience of the lessee. Page 17 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor 4.0 Equipment and Personnel: The ERC lessee will provide all necessary equipment to maintain and operate the equestrian park in accordance with planned facilities and services proposed. This is to include. all normal stable equipment, such as whe.elba-rows, rakes,. shovels, etc. , vehicles for delivery of :food, bedding, and manure removal; and horse training and riding aids. The latter will include cava.letti, jumps, and trail obstacles, as well as an individual tack-storage area for each stall with a saddle rack. Grassed areas will be kept in good growth and trim. .The ERC will hire the necessary employees to insure services are performed according to the needs of the stable. --- Feeding, stall cleaning, and site maintenance will be the responsibility of the ERC lessee. Riding instructors, trainers, and assistants will be located to fill scheduled class and schooling needs. -These instructors and trainers will pay a nominal fee for. use of the facilities, but will not be employees of the ERC lessee. The ERC lessee reserves the right to withhold use of the facilities from any instructors, trainers, teachers,- ride leaders, etc. Page 18 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor 5.0 Property Utilization: As shown in Figures 2 and: 3, the property utilization is planned for a low density equine facility. This is intentional in order to provide the desired effect of a park-like, comfortable open area. The total approach is to eliminate the common stc.ble stigma of a crowded, inadequate, fly-infested, dusty area that .has no aesthetic appeal. As proposed herein, the ERC will make a welcome addition to any community. The density of equine housing and spacing proposed will obtain this result. The proposed initial facilities for isolation, intensive observation, and pasture conditions are. unique in Huntington Beach and surrounding- communities.. These services will -- provide a great service to these communities. Improvements are to be portable or permanent, as agreed. At the termination of the lease, these can be easily removed and sold by the lessee., or can be .sold to the City of Huntington Beach for continued. ser.vice to another lessee. Page 19 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor 6.0 Regulations and Provisions: In order to retain these goals in actual operation, this lessee reserves the right to prohibit the use of the developed site to any individual who does not abide by the rules published by the ERC. At the time of obtaining a stall rental, a rental contractual agreement with the ERC will be signed by those persons desiring stall rental. This agreement will basically contain the following: 6.1 All equines will lsare 'at least the minimum innoculations required by the state, .such as VEE, tetanus, etc. 6.2 Equines may graze on open grassed areas only when accompanied by an active handler. 6.3 Equine owners are entirely responsible for liability of their equines and riders and handlers. 6.4 The ERC lessee is not liable for health condition or injury to owners, boarders, equines, students, or guests. 6.5 The riding or work-ing of equines is permitted only on established paths, rings, or trails. Riding and working are not permitted on grassed areas. 6.6 Equines are to be controlled at all times and must be held at the walk mhen r_-mot in a fenced riding or exercising ring or Biding on the perimeter trail/jump course requires the permission of the ERC, and all riders doing so must maintain their mount in a controlled manner. A stated fine will be p'Lace' upon owners of loose horses. 6.7 Extensive reck-lessaess, cruelty to equines, or rudeness to other boarders Page 20 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor or guests is not permitted. 6.8 Board fees are payable in advance. Upon nonpayment for two months, ownership of the involved equine shall vest in the ERC lessee, who at his option may sell the equine; the sale price obtained will be credited to arrears board fees, transportation fees, and sale :costs. Equine .ow-ners will be notified by registered U.S. mail of impending change of ownership and/or sale of the equine. 6.9 Owners of boarded equines and students shall provide written authoriza- tion to the ERC lessee to allow him to summon medical aid for human or equine injuries, provided a responsible adult owner is not immediately available. a Page 21 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and firs. MacGregor Service Cost Trailering $.75 Mile All other uses ..of facilities, No Charge riding areas, and services y Page 22 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Mrs. MacGregor -- 7.0 Proposed Price Schedule for 1973: Service Cost Boarding in pipe stalls $65.00 Mo. Boarding in box or barn stalls 85.00 Mo. Boarding in pasture 5.00 Mo. Extra Available only to owners.currently boarded in stalls; 2-week minimum. Training for horse 40.00 Mo. Extra Program training for horse and rider 60.00 Mo. Extra Daily grain feeding, for working. horses 5.00 Mo. Extra School horse rental 3.00 Hr. Only for use in classes. Transient horses No Charge Limited to 1 night. - Feed for transient horses At Cost Isolation facilities (when available) No Charge Instruction Group Classes, Paragraph 2.12 a, b, g 3.00 Hr. c, d, e, h 4.00 Hr. f, 1 5.00 Hr. 3 Reduced Rate, Negotiable Instruction Group Classes, Paragraph 2.13 a 7.00 Two Hr. b, c, d, f, s 4.00 Hr. e, g, h, i, n 5.00 Hr. J . k, 1, m, 0 7.00 Hr. p, q, t 10.00 Hr. Page 23 of 23 Proposal by Mr. and Pars. MacGregor 8.1 Management: ?!rs. R. L. MacCregor has managed, for a period of three years, a 100-horse boarding stable in tre City of i+orfolk, State of Virginia, owned by Mrs. Lloyd. Pars. MacGregor has imaged, for a period of two summers, a 150-horse livery stable and a 60-horse school stable for the Parks and Recreation Department, at Virginia Beach State Park, with hmrses supplied by Mrs. Lloyd. Mrs. MacGregor has also managed, for a period of one year, a 15-horse show stable In the City of Norfolk, State of Virginia, owned by Ptxs. William. Smith, owner of the Norfolk and [Western Railroad. Mr. R. L. MacGregor, a registered engineer in the State of California, has had extensive experience in personnel and technical management at several aerospace firms. He is presently employed as Manager, Mechanical Development Department, Data Processing Products Division, Hughes Aircraft Company, Fullerton. 8.2 Horsemanship: Mrs. R. L. MacGregor has ten years experience riding, showing, training, and teaching, and has had ample oppor- tunity for observation of stable management and practices in. Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York, Chicago, California, France, Germany, Spain, Austria, and Switzerland. Mr. R. L. MacGregor has worked two sinners on a cattle ranch in Texas and Oregon riding fence, and as a general hand. ._. :_11,i�i I­-�,... - - ---I.--- - -­A,i­*L'� - - , , .1'r.,�..,..,,z,­�Fl-,� ­ " 4 - I, , ,.f,!, " "IN-A.", M " " N I -1­.I�mm.-��l� ", .�1�'.ZZ C , .r-....�.,i I.-�­!�nL,-,;,_-4 nl,-�alrl�,,A � lw &-N I I IV, Me-,-,- ��Vzft��19i�i'��f.,.-�� _-,ji'�,�'l -�'�`�.".1'r..,: . .."I,-,�-.�.'­'��c4lp,;,�..�i�2.,....tz,�.,.'V,�',�*7�"., r. ,%,�-itiz.g!!1�11 I,�-_.,­v.-t, ,4w� .,`i;t_!0.5�� ,�:�',��ej,!,q",4,% ,, ,,�t�-- -,gz,;Dl.�Aqj�'. "­.�,,�7,t4* ­- �!I A�'a-_..z"j, ,�---�'7,�,2,- ".,.,;", M, on., �. - ,�-,,-�.I,7-,.,�-- I e�:-­- , ,,.r,"'._41. ­,", �i�, -Je __ t�,,.";.�,�.;i. "o, " 4, 'f.o.- - 2w;;:�,�, , TOM ­_­'lQZ - I.,.L.." -4 4�N'?"'F`_,k`­'5'�-­_."Q ..��.-..�.'�;,�.'-4M,r;._��il_.� .� -k .,,;;'I� _k p�:.iii,,J` - it 4.11 "X , r --F . �e, ,� � jj��.��t!'A, � _, ..��, .,9��.;, � ,i­ .4'.".L a,"01 . � * L.�r .� , , jamly .., , 1`��,V,.�'lq,,�.�4-'r ,4, , . ,� , - ­-.,.... I ,!::�._d;7, 9z MWAM.,�* P-':z Z., w... - .� N,-�­-.---R i��" ,;�.,T,�.;e, . t.-',�tff� - vl&.W,�l I _I.E'lft i� 11�1­_,_;�.!­��f' , - - - " '4"i t .74'�;, , - , '� , ., I .�-% ­: , " , ­__.,,`.,-",.,.,,�w�ez,��.',',��,���.',,.��:, ,,­-.,�'qlize .7:-�T,7.?�,%_-,.,., � .13 ,,,,.4­:2::­-7-,�,7_�_`4'.---I,,��-_� - -,.. � �'f' _,::0­;l.F:­I,�...-;-,�,,-i-,_,­;.!:�..,f rn r!zl__ ,� - - - , W�_:- F��?�. `i­.I I.I.:"n 1�" 4%, ,:� �,� - .z 1-11-1014 lml�­;r --l'. .-:,� - yy M==-,­K:�_),�'7-'N �I 1:,'�'�I ,-�V ITS 't,- - �:t;'.- '%7r _�Z, - "-,)�-.?,-­l.:,�-­%'g_'��3,.,j-i' _�._Y��_.N,.",�Z�,..:` -, .. "It-, ',:`:�._'.%'�I'l _;..i�, .­-,.;lr!, ­F, - �­-v ,."'_,v,,'t_: --,,,X!`��, `,�" I -, ---I;-I"_ .�'. ,"':.Z*,- _��!�, . ,- .,,':�l,11`�,,, - -�.�.il- -�',-e _- . I ­...- !��.,� -, -I . ,­'._.e�,is�, ei_� 70vt ,�,-, ,,�.­�O`I0.�,;;-._,�'�'J, �..v;?,­�p ',o,.'x2il�"-��:.-"t- �- ­.. ­ ,4M. ,! I"" ,�,E_��l I ­ ..'­l,�W-"F,i.­".!_� -- .... . '.,�i�_--I,sg,k,�r­-.��,�F�,.,. 7.,­�- ,.­.� ,��r�.. . , -��,li.,.,:,-'. :,.",,,, , , 4.. '. , !.�1.11. --pr�.",...."I...'�tIll., - - -, - ­ �,:".�'�, . . - .ei I .: . ,,::,I -.1�._,Fi.1;,ir'll­j­'�.�_� ,"I`I . . � --3-�,,�"1�1.,7.w.-t--" , ,. ,."".,.�,�r.�'f"�'--�.""�,':,-,� ,,, -;,,-_-l27-.­-­i_- .�'_,­T-'_­--l­ ". �-.zg:w, _­.1­..j;.­I—— Ili-.' ­v,0`�Za, .. `�%, - ;',F� .. - ;­..­ 1,­i 14, ? �50 0 OW An ;,I ­D`�141.itll -11 ,'�- '." _: P* .,��; .,-,;,:�� Ot .4 ':.,%�;Ie,X�":""..;,��.4t;�":!�,��z.�,� - .- ,Y'I.. ,I - .,-- x� iMV...�-��.?110p,I'..___l , . gwF ��!N­-',,,.�' - - , .....7:�54_!�.-,,,,eg., -'-.'_5, XW_ x . .1.11, -111. ­�4. gwm­-_MpMw.wqN=_ - M-"-wMWO---.m_ ,,;;, I.--110i;.�'..q,r,7-:�­�;-F�..-- X­'., "p. -,:,6 w0mg y MIN W_ I _',zitz,r ­­-z- — - 4 l.Q­­.-­W�-.-_.­`QAQjhT=jB . _�.��: -,-.f....,:! - -.,,.,I: , N�­o -;-'W" ..-,`4�.t-;-..I 1,7 �.,t%l , .-..,,...,- - , I R�, - .W� .� ,. -, .-IN —,e r,,I�7�.,I�Z,­"-1�-.�. --;i�,;, ,'L.'�:; , '4,'.­ "F �% - I;;-,� 1,-41,`��,v�v,,,-, ,­- -, I".--_..._-< � ,� - W7..."'.M., , �111.17?,N_1-I.I.. .­­ - , . - ,iv -,", .. -, - ­­­­ -"-:. I ,--w -�F­ _ , . ,­�,,.�-­I,_�,_Tl_f,y - f,­,-T­-_j i*e .,t --irl.-F ,�­ �I� ii�T--.,.�­­ .? �q�;�,�t,.,l--; tz.1.1t.-�,,, 'It" ,Z P"-, 4. . �._� -V ', - `1�!;.,7.,-�...'�.�j`._l-�"'M I- .�.,�_ A -- ,".. I,,F - , ,�X4,'��'4_. I. .,7, "­. . 'S I­1; ­.­­,­,,�,,,�:J�'_'4�-,'�%;I�.1,�'.,,,'.',�,7��,.k;.�ai,? , --�� it."', v , - I.r,-1',�Jl, .. - - N., ,�_­_.;%�.Fiel__.�'_ '..­- - -%" .... A-,,,i-,1. I. ,-.1-1,W. .. � _'. I -p v""TF;.__0 q , ,l ­,,-<­-.�,-p'­_,.. .;, , . .., A '14 .." _,l,.,,,,,%�,, ,_*5�,:t�711�9"lz­ 1-111 zi�s`:W.-U�t'i�'P.t!-­�i -.4.­,;. ­'­ , ,7,1.,�:_-,-.._�:%��ij!;�;;itz.'111, �---nt '..E:-1-2,�­-1.�, mvg_". - � Apz� ­ , ,� - , .."-.11, I.-l"ZI "-, . .Z ",(_�.7'.�_'4 I- ,i",- - , ­­,��­_-"­11 �', .., - - , , , ,7,w vl.:i - .11C.1--")�-­T,�,,�gr.l .'J,V.I.,'!�'�'l�",.,:r i;.­I;7T.,1,,,: - , ..... -Pl­­­11 -`� I" --� -r '�,Y!",v -rj-ii�"..4-1.�,���.".":d:l�'Z', .-..-,,�11 -.1 I ,. ... �, .. " - i� - .. _�,, - - - �w . i�,, , .� �,"�'� -;.;-,�4s,'F-y.-wi,; 'r �,: . , __ .-:�,,�,,,' ":�,.iF .'� �"­4 1, - -- -,'..�';.� wi'. " - l2i,- ­,,-4�,�:�­_­ ."­... ...t, - *'!7C.j�i.;:flf ..t -?. �%; , ��� W I QW U-lll-�--'i.Di,m­";,%'4 j,, ,. - ."..", _-_; ,-w-4--"J"'"�14'.,;."�-.-,.. -_-1�4"',,, 1� - - _-__"'' .. ",__.. ., ,��f .�,f R, _'F?v%' _ . _n , - _­!O!A�. � - - t�F��,;',i;�'.��.,p_ I, , ig� Z, -­,�, , `e,�;. '.i,§f�&,�­ �-,z_'... f,ut"� _;� 'I ::�--,,��4�",- , .". __ . y t%i­,,ej. 1, n-­ ­,Zg,�r'. ­ . lf,;N', fl, __ ,� " �;,�r ,.Y,' - , -- -'r. ---X , - 7" -, -.jT.�.- lj,7�­�. - - -V--- g-W......"_� sz,­z I.--,.; :�,�f": _N , . _li,j�j,_'..p..,- wk � , _.. - igk�-.�,�,�ia, ".- _,�_- -.:i�,�il,!��,";�­ - -.�- I. .. - , . -� �r',. ,.,7-. ?� i7pl_�ligpo" , '"1�&;�,", ,� � - .. - , I - .. - ­'T.4I...�11'1.1, - - fff'f.� *" .. . I. I lq.-�_ "..,-A., '.,Ug­z�l,;­" ��-,%�ftr"- -11.!'l­Z"J-l�:,; i..". ��-!,i�.`, .1. ,l,..,T,lF:NJ�-_,; -..: "-.-,.-. , F'..",'17711E�-.�, _­­ �r. ,�g,���ti,;'i .,__;,�, , ...11... - 11 .-��_--I- I , " , �, .=-,F,;..l,l�l,' ,�,�?, r,�.,',7­4F,i;.-,,j�-m, - �_l ,_ ,--�,-'le,,,��'JP - - ,� � a ."it, - Q 1',��.:4�zg - , ,�MVA,1'.;�!itl V�lllil`� '. 1�:­.� 't 4, , .!,�., _� , � 'A��-;v-_-,f L-�,,--,,,-��,�;,,�,-,';-�'�"-�lE�l-'W-�.,-5� -,----. I .-[� .r. -.-I,, "j.1.__�.6��c - --,­,­­­­l- -,,.�, ", jr�,r,-�,�,�,­. ­;,e._ --,,-Ff­,�r.;,t. -"-,". ��.­­."$`?_,.. �,��- , 11 IR -;.'�"-­W:.-,-,.-��;W_VW­FN'0,;�4' " ".-,�­­.i . .... g I. " ..3, - -';* .k� . . .. . -F � - _�'j .1 �;: i -4, ,� ,!.o -P. . -, ge ox MW `;t. , ". .�,�; - ,)Z? _i �L�;i;:A_xi�",Z,!7; , , .11 i . �,",.­""' 'Z�,;�.'�-,.;�',,,'�7-.,Z'-,:":�. .; '­,�U. �11­ wm'�*; 0,It- ". , -­P..'�P;:­ j; ­" ,,It . 7­1,�� . .- -, -�F-l­ ,%,;_'6�T'r, -.1- ,t­ - 1.1- ­ 11.1-1­1_11�1 , ; ..�_lj,',..I i­ - ___­q­, ,i��;,7;�,�,-�Alz�7,�.t,�,.,:,�, .L­ �l -- W �_Ap -1111., �, '.'I'l ..M­ :� I Wm---W­ ,17,t­6l�_.-;jj,­I. . -1 ­ .1, , � "'� -,� �t .1 r, - ", ,VIA I�.V.'�!��,..";."�," -� ;­; ,­� "' 1 ­26, .­­n"­,:.,_­,-­­',l-P,w .�_�;�I Z,".zmi4 it.��-­,�t�;­�. �r:�i�v . '51�.bfr­�kl:lpz�'�v'IC-e,llF,;t­,'l I—' 1-11;-�...,.:,,�"I;�.T­,.,,,..__ .,�-Tt=�� f 0 X , I % -t,,K.,"----,­,,�,�lv, .,`F,;i".:­­' . I ­ ".. 1!j,�d .�,i� _�Iz­�,. .:� , , - . . . ­ , ",,I-." . W . . q ­.. % "R', -1� .Vly.�,�it_�'. " U,�i*� � , ?1-t,��.11.,. -FY, .­_ - ­".l.."l,­�­' � 4�, t.-,,,;I- T,'.iA!,�:� - . .. . - - - - F,A�ql,G��4-;,IV *, '�,w� I., - ,, i,.,, " _z �pw.�17:, , . il.,� .� "_w.,. , j �. ,�, Z, -- .- ., ­,�Fq­.,,�'!" - ­­­­34" ,,-.�ii.�,,,,,,�-�.,,;�'�7,;,�,'A .-,. -, _ _1 , .�,�,q" �zm,;iI,- ;l --�t! ,- ­­ -6:Z,-.-.i�,­,­­,,.n,,Wow!,m NOV?.Q,�­.. -l:,,0,_­, I­­!,;�,��e;.­- ,7 ,ot FY4 � �iz&�� ., ;;:.-15�'�,,�-4�t� . `%';,Ig.'�, ".­;w�,:F.� - ,� , ,� -,�'4�%.' t- , . - - .-"i$g'Zk -!��*V; -��.,!,t�,;.�, - , ,. .1 ...�,- ��,,-�,,�ia,��,.4""..�,,�.,�'., ." 1 3'�,, �; ,,,�.l , I , ­,....-% � We -_ _g,� ,1,.;j; -, ,, 4 v'T-_­i,- 1- "'. . t..;_ ., . . .". >_�Q" !I--, --w -, --- ,v-3 I-, . , �,l . ­." ,;�',� A '. . , ,- . . 5;vy�lv, �,.'T; .%V ,i I, qpfls.'�- ,W'y. �,,t, N.­j.­;_-,'� , - -"; - - -j-1.0. - , - , 0, 'y, vl;_ ­.j&;-.j.,.­;,�,2N '3� , _ ..; . � l,.:..l,l`iIlll�e­Iidn� 'lzrN . - .,3--,�t"'', .-� �,J­ !'lv- -%I;- . ...­; _�-,- ,-," �, I .17.. �-­,4pf_,. . -" - "� - ­?'­., "i", L," .11"..*1 - ,I Ig'r- � ,­_ 11- �,_ 11, ,4.q, . .,0",;,IIN��".'�4' _Z�'NV,,Mi�­,,'I,;,i­�.I,,-,�j�z-"3'If. .. , - - "Lk..'..�,,.�7�',.,,�',,.�,.*,�"li--;�,-��lli�,�4�?���,��,�-�'� ­.�: �t_ al� , R.'.�.,!� _"�,"',' ,?71*."A:i--,i,,,-,.-i,,,--�-..,.:T,����-x,'..",-�t�'k�up ,� ,:�,!, .. ,, `,,Z�"-'Ar.�.,��,,t�LI!"I' " .,�X�',i. .z,­, I"I-..-;i-,v-i, 4, , ,,* ,�!, . � . � ,�V, ��I,%��'��k7 1_'V�,�'_' - ,;_�,_;., �� t,"7;��.14i,;,-a�: � _S e,.,.,I - - - ".-,"I 7�'­i�,`�, - � * , � ,- - . - - . �. , , .,It , ta­..�;;.._;., -,1:4. , , V � , -I .; �,,, "�� ": �i :'�4.",:,t�lt��,-�'�,��.�".;�, 1,. ` .- - ,.4. - ...F­�! , -,�"�::�".;,,"t,t;�?.,,­"��'-, %.-,�,,,-, - ,,;�,o..,,�:��.i . . -, - , �,­,�........v-_ :_ ,�;:-­'l::-.;-,',,,,,- .­ .-,�I,r,..j:�: L li M 1 ! -Ig';...to *­­_`�,,,�,,�, �vy-o-"W"T"'; . :.,..,.,­ __­.. ,,I'"Fi,,,?R. .Z.r.": �. , I - ��.l ;"�_­vt.,,� .,L ­i--1, bit, FI, J,;'�,�:��._. f��*�'T�x'a, 'i 4.�': , -, I�;4;1�L: '. , . . .,;.i- .. . . , , ",f,-...;�.� -, -,-�.; ". �,�,;,:�. . . � . ��,,.,edo'.�,R,F, ��..'�,�� -":��. �.;,.,I , �l _�­,"'a,,��'___�, � _,�,-- , -� �,',� -,,. - . - - �,.Fj`. L';",--'.,-,'.-�%,�.. .;�:..-��'. _;�1,... ,.­.1�1.0...,; ­W, ,- 5". , ��-­."Nkwl.. ...., � - --�, ". - " ,'' .. '�,'­,li�ty , ,: " - '70"'...'._,"'. _14 - "' - -- -�-.":' *"` -.-1.� � 0­� ­11-�'_%ill, . . I I �.;­;�_-, - ,- """wh"WA,�,.'­._,l;.5 - n4,4�4,'i,,�;"4j'4�&- - .1 � ., ,�L� - .. 1 1 .I . " , �,_?'4.1.­ ".. .T-.,, ." ."'...,­." - '4,.,�%.'.._­%F,,, - _,�­.';�'­�,:­,4;;,�... gP "n"..,M;.,�..-.-.:-.-,.�,�.'4���,���,"�",�,�li,,,�! ,;,.,4'l­'.­,,­%­l . ll�,,`,�,i .�'i M -t. " , ,- '..,,!��.�.:�';��,,�;-- - �"Wl -1 ?"r""""�.�� ,!��# . - -.,�­z ­ - , ,7".. .11" I i, . , ,�, -F�.!�,�.Ill 1 40­�4, .1.�:, .4', ".P,�4:;,,�,,, ,"��i ki� _.,-P, . .. ,L�1:-F, , w . . .I �J:�Ji.p`W?,' ,,,,, " 11, .11, ,-%­­- .-,.. � ,:�L , - , .! . , 1.1--r".'. ­.­,,�1'51p,;�j, ',_�'Ltti 14, . �,-,"'�,,ll t;f2,',7,i'.ii­.4etl_ _,.­ 'M­".�iI�..A* ,� �';,�-tt-,..,�, ,. .-, .—% fQnMA �,�:��, - .. - - .- , ,­1 j ", �.-�;-�,."I ,2wop"y"ML , ...A:I'".,n,_.. �. .1- �_!i��, . . ._ ," , , zxs"-pynhu�.l....,1�."":1 .- ."�4���;,'.'��,'�'.,,;,'��t".I��,.:,�:.,;,�;4"".�,,�,,'�',,.�,,���'�, ` �'::�, , .I .. �.qlrl%li._�,KIN I.Rk _��, lk.­�p`.:'- ,.",::- *11.11.� 2 .��r" ,,.�:j .,Z,'l. . .z , � ,%'..� ��i. � " ..j�i;i-�.... ..�,F;�.`Z�i.":-,.%, ,I,.i .:, �- , u... - ,- - ­ �. . �Z, . I -I . I - _ - .4 .,r ;", . , . . I '. .c ww"'i . - � i� �l .. ."t., ..:z,:j . �.� ''�" i -�r�o<� 'v;,,�.",4;01";,;,;�,���r'.,,- W,�, -���,-.,..,i:,-,,�,,�.".,.�,��';,. I . , .��­,,,..,1�,,��; ".1, . .. x . " - 1, ,W�Ql MW� ,� ; _4 .11 k _., 1�,:n.�,�'r 2 N : = - i . I � �;l ;" ,4 ,�,;�;44,��:&*, � I .,� "i�- W: , �� F,tjv��, 1 9 16" 1 PA. ..v: , , , . . g__,,­ ­­-,"-.*.17.�,,,,�.;,.","�,.,�",, 1­� , .f , � 1 N.: ,. " I !1_1 . _;.,­:,.l.,. ... �M Q��"..�,,e�,F'F'���,z-�,e .�� � . . . .. , .lrl� - _. , , 'i�',�;",���t,7'."'!��'I.I.��l,-'�;��.�"Lt;,;�'.- ,.l ��'i.,: , I�� . ��iv;......2., ,,�i. :..1".''.. . . . 4:. , ­,�,' AN i �� , ,i',',:�"`.'­­' 1 3 yW2lAM.Mlv-"X, : -_1 Qv , � 1. - ,�,-,, 00 A . 010146", . e�,- " -�.� � I "V�. . �, ­... :1-�_�.-��,-, � . ,, "" � , I -I'll ,;, ,� � I'll- . W�Mmg-=..4Z" , , 1,xx�to . .. I., - yy�� ". ! AV Q_-_""W". "a�:P.. "�4-,-�,`,".':,,.. ?2 v�".`-,,,.��.,`� .. �!, ... � _:,>__u�,� ��',-.�;"� ll.��.1,141�1-1.... 1 :.'0;_l, �:-�,,, - ��,�.!`:�� �5__� Z,.­,,.,.­..�r_,,61 - p -,.` -i, . 1 , - " " 1- !,­lllil�, ..� it. -1_z'.t�. ,'%7N' -11���-j,,!-;�.,T . - �'!�": ; . � :�, .�: , ;,' �:::::::::: T., -, "i",�I 1 . .... � , , -__ �� -1,;,1'r,,"I',V,:�':�,..�..­ I....�:��.�,:,-,,,. .1 -1 ,:,.4,; : g J, ::::: �.;:, .�-­ � -5 w W-w-"I"? ,", , ! , _- , - - ` , ," , " ., -, ., �* e, , ," .. , "': .", "`�,- - -"'E' , . Wozlla�, , . . ,111�-�" - ­,". ., .­,`�: ,,,,,",";!, �"t�­'_,','. :.-�, - .;,'. . , _ . ., _; . ,-�.,,' .'_1. � ; ��_ ., �,� I. .. �'..4 � , _'v� "'! �. I . ill's Al o�ltoo2l; 1 , ,�,i�., .".,.`,.-- "`.,�.,�l - !,Aw,t� -,Pog, " ,',, I.:�ll�'i A�� .." .'�'11, ,. � ,�.141,�,"I,11, , �.�_ I, : �m� I , � � �:_ ,��;1. ,.""" . py"y"p) .""W' '-,;" �� .N ,--.- ,1�,It_" ,1 "... ", , ,M "..I . , ....�.��-_.�,,.�!,�,�;�,;..4t_ -,I ­.", I, .,Z i,f",�`%�—­,-7,_,,�,71;�._-,z,i "r!- , 4;,4_.�i, -, - .- tl- � �,���_ ­7­jja.�v' -n­7­':z"�f,'.4,4�',l,,' ;�.i,"�,-; ,- ". .;,;I, I: - ___ , �".,..,,�'.".,�;.,',,.�k ,*:�:,: 50 0�: _t�� ,,'..,,"r... .....I ­�-­­,I'- ­F 1. ".o7­ ..,,, -1., ,�i,­ , .: .�� ,� .; � . % �"144mf. .��, . , ,,,i'l,�'.­­ -. t ." , ,l.", 2twnwwxv;:: :��',� .��.; A,- I !�,;�,�.-.;"­:.­,p ,:,­­4 ,.-v.-�,-� ! .,;-;.;.P,.,�,�;�',Lt, *.�� ­ . .;,�, ­� ,�,�. � - . "' _ _4 -,.llil�;.';�� ,I,--�,­i 'r'll,_. �,� _r.��,',­,;­­ . ", I � , ;�: -" - W" -- - . !!-,,i,�..,f����,,,I. --;�'j -..-, " ,� . .1?z __ "-V-0 mum,A of "`�!F.��t .;,.�., , , _%,., .� . ,��F` -, . . . , ��'l - � .,,,:,p --, . ''..,7,;_�.,Wil;: . ­1 :7­�," ,w, -',:�,�,,�,,,C'-:,--�';;",. v _11�11_'�"i , �� _.. .. ,��.:"r Z.5;� , - - .I 11'­ - I I��j",!IT � ­,.­�.,;1.1"':", .eF, � , ",� ." � t, , '. . . . . .. ,.�........i _­ -t,�:'.,tff�_­A�­- ��'��i�'­:�.,',i.�.:"'.. ,- - ­­.- - �� ., ;"�,.,"��I."��l.zv;";."�,-�.Z, ".1, ­,­'..�`i�2 I I .— -- - �,1� -:�,­;'.,--;ii��,�F":i...... ��­t­�.'��',�7-�"�l!'.�.-�4-,,'�,..� I . , 7­. , .�, "7.... . - , '4� -1, ,�l ,I, , ,` , �". �: -'Fil .���; `,7 1.�. -'� 11% �",,- ;, :�., �,,,,�r. ,..�:,,"._�'.�!�.'.,.-�,:.:�",,' . ,,,-,qi:"F,11­1,.- .1". .��' '.W,C,­",�,?.;4_.�il�:� , " �,'­'�'.'�,"" "­1":�4:-�,l.',r.I . I �.;_,-.. ,�-, , - -­�,,:�I I. ` -�,�­ ­,': .,� .- ... ,,-"I'-__.�%,4..I,�":;.,-" . ., ....,�.�,-il,;,..,V,,"�,1 A�.I i,40�"i!",15 4t�l.�."A',-�--�':-,-,,1,I;�4 M 0-0��L . .;­;­Ijl" '7­__'_ :�!,,`��,ill , I M , -I, ",­ _b , '�'�? Ex .- - ...,....�,..­�Z,�.,�, a,�,,,,'�­�-,,�� - , . ?�.%, ".,�­ ­ _.4,z . ,: . _.,� ­­ _,,, �, "� ;;..,t,:Fv i . .,_ . �i; � � -q� -'�,,,.;"vm�;��,- p---",,,�"_v . `,L��_,,, .. ,,-­1-147.1 � - ,�i iI el�. . �7f�;$��o�"��'. ,�. , ,�- vi.p - ", , . , ..?,..-" _lp ., 1'.� �,,-" .� 1: .- I ,...'� �11��_;ol,,��.,,'- ..�"..:;I, . � Q ­- ,,�.-; ,lt',,�_O,�. ,.'2�; .,': � , , " . . ­...., $ �. �-,:, -- :, ­-­ j, .,,�"'..­_ ,. ,-,1 -.�...­­­ z� - _1� lm.�,t!�.�!.I;Z`I��`,�., A-`,�Aili-i?Q��,7::_ I-�`1,0w.",m V�rol. , . . , - ., .. I. - . �'llll '.I ,.. .".. . ,­ .��,,.'�I.. �I-.; .., , - '4:-,-,*3� , - .;,." f..� .; .. ­, , . -, , , . - . - - . , - . . .." 5 I . , q�4 , - __; . . ...'."...,, .- �. fl; K,.1� ,,,..�-';,�, - 40 Sows-"u-- _� Allots!'. � ,� . � -, , �� ,� 1 . "u, _­�,;­'-�3,,-�,F-;-�,V,7it J," onviv"'S I-L, �I, ',m� - ".. , - o.�;,­­: 0".�t _;.`,.,��_"" -" , �1` .. I � , - � -I __ � . 7", ... . " _.? A - �;. . � ., , �� ,_� 17,i _, none.Wwov"TOOT& ,.�.,. ". � r? I'li I 1 - --I "unn-l"Up.�;'. � ., , �� ,_ .�, ......,,.,:.�,­ . '-,,,.,­i: 1�, ,.,. .. 1'11'11� . -, -',.,F.`.�:.�,`-,71:­� `..'�r,_� ­.! � ., , �� � ::� �il,le".,.T fr­,',�,- �I� .. I 10 , -1.r 1,-,!,.,. . �­;,' . i:� �.�.'..,�-�� ..�...� - ...� . .", �,'�l e_lF, -.�;­;i�,!,'-':,;� , . , ., I.--j I I v..: 0"'; ''.I ...,_ ", .1� ,-,t,,�n '. 'I,.,,,. . .....:, �:.!",--".;,.�.�",.,�-��'.,.'-...:,�,;� ...,.:: - ,4,,;r�:Af`.......;.i.'-. ,...,,,,.-.�;�-�.�:,:�""..�.;";,..� ; .- I . p ` .v�:",.�',:-"�­'. 7 � -�.. U.,�;k%. ." ... :�.I,�...., .:, ,-.,-f_..ll�'c;"", , . - ,- ..."....­,�,-.�,,'-. I-, - . , , _41... ... '.-�, .,"', .­1. , .. . " .�: .. , 2:� ..�... , 1" . . , .l., ."� _._.. ,1 - , - � . - - - .., . -t , . ,.,�­`:"C,�., az ,t: �"QLkl­,. . ': .. .-, NOV,"n-yo . . ... - ... 111 ...... ., ,w - .� , . - .-5..?�. _1 ; , . : .�ll 0-1: - - :­.,�., - ,. . '!�4,�.-.!,'*.; __;F_l7:;"t..l.l­ . ... � . 'k.,)I`;i),:l .. ___ I . .. i"� . - . . ....:... -71,9i��,�,,�','ti�t:-­..:,-,I ,;.­�­� .--%irw- v,"O.sr� -�ll..C.". ,,;.;"- , , `i�%­� ,:_.., `­ . .. , I ­ . � , . � - " , " ...,I., . ._� 1; z_ .:� .:", ,,�-��-;' .. .z . � �-�:�:,:.��".,'�.�,,,7;-,­..,,:1, .. ...,.. . I - � %, . ''! - Q. _..�. 1. . .�_ ..:;i:. .:..�, , ..:�� .�w '. ..­l.r­­r'�-11.11 ." -_� . .:� � . - '... ji,­-..- .. .... ,:--�%.-;�,�­ ., . .l.;.,..: , �_, , -.4 j; ", .., �­," � I - " . , . .�T. t -0., I .,.",.-. 0­,,.. . , .� '.... .. �1_ .., ­­� - , . -, , , -n� 1 ,, .. 1-1 ��L;:' ,:. .4 1. �l� 'I, -.t,_,.v- �`. . . . . .1� �. , , � � . . ,�F. .-.,,,!.;: .1�1.1 . %"'.�,�--;,,, .;".��i..,,,,,,�.,i;-"- ,�,` :!I . . ,!i�`,:::.I. � ,.,:F,;,­-,!;l- .,­, -�,,,,, . . v �'. dr- . , . .�,.­. - . I;.-­-,'r,, - ,� i v I.�t .� "., "' , -, I - - , ,",", , I _. ., . ,. � . . . - ""'. r;. .;.,.-.­_.­!,f.... �.,",'�,. ­ " - - .�.,-,,��,,-,� - �11�1 �.' Q'..r . ­I' " llls'.�&' ..'."I 1�­ ,:: . .; ..... - - .- , ,,��"� , ­.'�_. , z -, '' ­::�,":.:�':_-�,� .:.-`-;;.�l:i;:,: �-.,��'.,- V��Z,'!" I I . . , , .�. I. 1,14' 1 1,11i, _1� 114. ._., ..".. ..I-,-�".:`".1, ...."". ; .. .,; .� 4��, ,;,., �Q An 1 I . I . � : . , , -� ": ,, - , '. . 7 .. `:j �­�';i"�'::7": _-.".� - . .,:,V7.�Z_F�,­." � !I,. ­� .. .". . . �_ :_� - .. ," ���� ,%,�, � . '�,.,.. . 1�,.­ - .,�!,:t..�; - ., .,�!,:t..�;.. I -11 _�--,�,­,::,.pl�,-`,,.­.,.�.,-. --),. ��'t,*;.�."",-1. .. . .. � .4 - , .,�!,:t..�;.. �,.,Vl. , . I., ,� .. ..z�� .-, ", � " ;t"', ,., ,-, ...:'.s' _,�,_. �. �:: "'.,1.ll-pl., .''.- ., X�":,, �i� ". .L._ . .:. �.­ - -_�t __`1": . . ": . . v .;.,.-.. � , _.; w" -1 41;:w ,v , , - :, .. . . .­111- :"..J" . �, .; ;__�..­, .F., . ,. .. . :.� .:. .. ... _..., . " UP", �0 -, -TT.'" , L� -I.�!�",.'_!� . z.t­�. ",1 AP�.',',� . - '. .: : . , , ;---.,,. -,I., , -i,'-,%,�.�:F.,_;;;...;'':.. ,. . .� .1 -.1 --- �* - q �, . .. . , ". il", , y . , I .. .!. . . . ,,Z-7,�', , - .,.::',�.,�",;%, , I . . ::"..': ::, ".. ­�'. , ..- - . . :. . ...�. .� _.' - - ­ - .;:._��r,4_�­-,�,.I'...."� _�.._,'­L�!.- ­'..", -,'I,-- ,- , ,- ,- . . ��::-,__ -:-, �-,.-,,,-:;'., , ,�'... �,­-­_�,'­ ,; _; - ,- , :_A:''4,,,-;�-._,,­`� , - . .".-:"�,�",,.7:��,,.I�::, , '. ."i -'O",. ".��-... �F;% �.,.:- ­­li�,,:-;� .'.'!�":<� - . . �- '.,,%--�, . " , I -:,_­­.­­­!.l.l .1� :-- -.-,. - ,� ,*-..�.',­;lw,;i;­­'. , ;*.--.�-.,�7 ­ , -," " �,.­,�','.i:,iAt�1,14'­; _­,;­­.­.'... -,�­' '.�,�.�'.,,-:,�":z.,�-�f,.-��,�� "� , I i:-, - .a,� 0 0%v" .,�, . 1�-.1-"I . . - -11"Ile"V�: .�. "�I-! .,_;-, - `,�,,, ,v,­t; . . -17.ll�"_11',Z:_.�. ,". e. , -,­"..,I--,- , WASN" , I .. 1;�,,:. I... " ." , 4;�'.�llig_.- . . -';�; ..I., .% '.�..:.-?:IYj,,.-,v,', t-.�,.ik,:".,,-.,:?`, , ll.,,.,- --� -.,-..-;;:.'.�4,�:;"-.,-:u,i�,,.,�,.,,- 1�f�'vl.�lll 'm :. -..,.:, __ ­ -W"".i -,e,..,,--, .,�rp,��!�,'". -- ;, ,%%:-.;l',�,;�j,:'p.,.-­ " "­. 5QUagletw" W_A,Z.- � - , . - -" -�., .�`:,, .I .. ..----�-�,","-I I ll;..�-I .. - .. , , , 0 I"awynagwN -� -S­ """i. ..',;;,4"��­ ,, -1 �. I. ,. .: v wt ... -- . , . - "" " . . .. .. -1. I .1. ;,A:_._ , :.j". . , , - -- -;' ­'.. ­.",.­�­- I— I.., -" .. .._�..i�%Illl_,L!.W..":�,ali...,r-:-.,-,�--- I­w,�',_'.��t�`,:�-',,;,,i:­� . . - . -n,0 V��a�&;,-�­,.'ll ., ,, , - -� -, -�� , .11 ­1 ­ .. , ;1% . .4, , -: -�! -�� a;wt,;f� - .. I "� ..; .. . " 'ItIf, ,'� ,.. .,. t.,,�;."-, _&.�ir�,-!�,.i��,44,�';tz �. ­ W .� , I �S.4i­ - . � .. . .., t _�. A , -.4. 11.1. , �� 1:%. "I ."w M-7.,;-- ._�i�,',!%,�"��. ����--.'��. � ,:.-:N�� - -.�-� It,.,;,,_11--t-1Z.1.1. �". , . - '...'. ;::.',�;.,'��,;'--_`,�.k :�,-','?,,",7!�:��'4,�.i'-��l,!,.�,--,:.-,-,...- ,,_,-%".'6`;�,­r,�,1 - , - . -:F', -.1 "17;',�� - ��Z"!�""T'�'�_]' , ­ �.�""�6�..Vl�',,,..i":...,.-...�'.., ­­­­�., 75. � . - ;. ­T-�-.� , ��,,I 1� 1W 'I'l - � ...,---:,.:. �.;.:��ff, ,��­ :: �"� I.',,. . - � . ,- ,i;�; `?:'. - ­llw­.�i..., . , il;- , ,�',,%.:.- .. �' 'r .; -.-­ ,----- -t- . 1. .�.,::, .�. -,r., I" , . . �,,,,. .,,�,,�914��-F",; . ­­1­1­ � , -:,�:�, -,-�:�7,E.714,I.�% , �: ,7;�'_� .. �:l "�Q..., . . , I '. ,_­_ 1. I I_ .��; - __�­;!.,."� - � _­:,� .;.%'j�_,-�,:Ft%tl�'p,s,--��,,� �q . - , _.7��. ,.. , - - � ., �- -�,".,".�,7"'�!:.,J� !.�,���'-, �2- ..-,- T-, ­,,�;...,,!;::t'. . ".%'. .­,%.;:��;. �­.­F."­_, zt,-­­�­_'.`­�.. .* , _;iI_1`­� -1 '. ""T.�-­ , :!*,`,�. ; : . ,, �.:,� .: "" ' - - :,,; _�; llliv� ��;7, ", - , 1. .1 '. .. . - -�.­­ -N­ -a -­ �"­,:7�I_­V�p'i 7��j!!­�. ,,-_ , :. � . � `_ ' ".,,�17."��-,,,.`,'..��_`,;,-. - . . .: . , �,�",��ll;,��-�quK-Lz,..�j,7�'.715�l,.,. ,�;f- --..� - -,-, " -., " i * , , :,- ,--,..,. , , �,,,t­­�,_.. ...... ..:i.. 0 1 50112 so 1._; *1,".- - - - :;..- ,-_�. .ti::"i .&-j -flow A i�,' "I :1,11 ," ,,,4 ;�.,�j�'7.j� -.A' ��'� ��lj, . �; 1, - �,�,­;.-�, �':j,`__-__ ;�;�jf,..:..:.-...; ,,�;:�,,e. ',:',,��,,:.,,.'�: _ .,�, - ,,;I" WANSAW: ,�q,,.�.'K;­.�,!'4" . - Rvh��s� .. I '. " .- - � . , - I , , ,�_� :,'. ,.'�,.'­..,,-,���.. .. ,:i ,:i -,:i . ___ _ - -­47UY . ,:i . .�' -_'ill - - - W,�5�f,, � l..UI.11 1­1 ...: _)WA-- - - ", . - i�l .., ..- �.�::,-, -.! - .;,�7,;7_ .. MIL-�.,IVI.Cri:�, _;%�,.��,�:F�4,�!_,­ W. ,1'. "!-, ., , .� - v-',-�.,I,i4*� 0­-- ­iL-R V,- , -I 1.�r 'a, . �­:,­*:i-­,-��-?.�'�.,;­ , ,,'...... .0 -�;,F, ,�t . ,, iT�-;r-�,4�.- -g-", 4 1-1.11.11-­­. � � " - _W­�,.,�.zZ� ;�,:�-,'-­� . A , it; ­­� ��,S;NW 0 R* a, - _',�� - .. .l...l.."'.1-11", , . :, , .�. ,i", r,­ - - .. , . ,�i­---- ��,­-,'.0,! ,� ..�'.,;,.O�,�� ," .::, - I ,. ... ,!:; . -u-...I . ­­. ­­ . .. ...... S ;� '. , ;' 7- .z�,�i.. . , - .., - - ��.`41'1'�,:`�i-, ,,,-,-- - 'i - .i-;l;h�i.`t`,­,j7*k .-Il. -, '' , "" ., . , , , . , ,, ,;I�I�lq`w. .-,tz�: . , . ... � - , .. , � ....... .. ,: , . . ,- ", -- Q-� �; -,;�,� � _. , ..�...:�'.'­­" - , �.; - �"""""",,,- ,,, , -�4� - ,.�z I'-I�Fwf* f"MA-why-ti ..._�-.,',.. .. . M. r N--,-; .-.,,;,..� .L., . .- .- "'i . - , L'�`.,,., -- � -­ ",, , ,,. .. -..:�"�_,��,:� , � "'. - 5.;;:F�­ .._.�- I.,..... I'll ..�,,, -. �S. Q-,,.?..;-,,.I� I ..I -, '...'�":­.". - ,�1. ­:_.:,i.", -i.,­ �-� ...,,�..,:,. ,1.',-t",_ . . ��..- - , .- . �la,-, ­­`­­­.�'- �!' .�, - I - -?,�-; ­ . . ..1. ,-:., .., ,.� . ___ . ,. :,""IF71,�Ii!T, -- .:I;"- "- - .. .�'­­­...�,Il. ,,�-��:I-:,J",�. -1.111 ,.. ..I...I ,"..... .,.., .. ....... .. � -. -1 ll� , � - -7` ." -.�7, '-I j'i! -1��r. � ,�"!I-"I���'.-�I _"�,' .-. ,I .. . , z � -t's.,�,,,:;,*�,�,'.�.::;�,--�---- ,­-W� .,. .,,.'-�,��','�SI-, A- ,,,�-6, �A..,,L4N�it., ,,"­:_:� r, � .11� , . - ..�.. , .. - - r"�, ...,�- - ., . __ - .-;�. '. -�-.. - - ,� ", , '.;::',,�j".:�Z'��,.--6�4-..'�-:1��.�: . ,�,_fl'i�;7!161-,..,:,14k�. .,'­� .. - ,:, . � . , , . . . .w ::­ --,., - I C­­­_­.j ­,­-, - - -t,"-., z - 4 t_v� , ��" ...... �,­ ��, :. :,.'.�: �_*,',:,�; - I . - ., � , 4L �...,',,,N ­; I.- I . ; . . - ,.&4, I-A 5.';',t--;:,�, ,Tt`,�­,,,z�,,�;�%,;,*.`,. ,.f-*. �--, :.".: "' t .i'. .. ,-.., :. " , , ib_1_1�­­.­­­ _11"'.4—"", I Z�...�..�� 11,,e"f.",.� . . ". ..; 1� .,Z­� , �. , . : ,� ., �, � Z. -',;,-,'�_ �� .. - - ., 6 , '. -, ".,, - ...- .1 -�-wN-- i��OFS -4, . .. , , I;44,�,�, , S� --- . I . -, .; . , ��:'.-,���'JZ�.�7�,'��'-�-,�.r�-.�,",:.�,: , - 5 ,, ,- ,':� 4. ,�,,-,-)t,I­_'�,�'. � . ,11 . " , .. ­­� ­..__,l;I",;" :.?,-;, .^,;.,�-,'.',,�l.,:,::�..���;-,�.IF.�.��,�-.,.".,,-,-��.��.R '�, ;, .. ., �. . q " " ," . ."..�'�'%.�.;.;i '. 1. . - .1 . fr k,�Fj.�&��;.',"��!,j�;.;:�,' ',,.f,,'.... L- -,-.t­.j'.t-,. ,..,-., F­,­,'�, . ..;o,,,�f, ��',k,:'a. "-Z.- � ."A�.� . ... -::jw',' '. .7-,� ­. �- � -,-:,,,I r%`.',`L�� .:;,..�..�'_-- " -;,­ ;'T : --�l , ` , I * - " ." .l...'. .,�l-�:" I"� � - .", ,Y. . �­­,­­ , - .. . . .i - ,, � .. .: ,;:;W.­p , ",� -1.,.,..�,- ., , ;.` Ii..lr .j , ., �:,,-,� - �'­�.....,r.:' .:! . , ; _,;. , ��_ %.im., , , .,I g. ,-"--4!��-, ', I im, :-,.-- ., �:F. �"I"N;', .I- j . 1'. �. , , I?, �:- Z";, - 't,-�`,,_-,,-�,-�;;7.4__-�:.11i'-.1-vi�-t"V � ., - " .,l�.-IF­'­,­: ,..- ... '.. fi;..�. � 111. �;,;..;-.1, "', . _:,�;�,�,­r­;,.;_,.".."­:,,�r��%,'. .,r� ., �_,�-',-..ql��,',,-�:.�.,�- �. a -', ,. .� , - . � ..".11, .,� � . . , -�' "".."-­.-,.,..,f:-.-_ , . �.­­.-,-� � t � . ,�� , � - - . ,�:.._,.,;T � �0:��� , e�, � �'�". ",,',�t,r,.�,., , , _ '... . . ..... ,.- .l.; ��, . . - -_.� ,..'�"� -;�i��',,��",-7"z�,�,:r�,%'.,:,�-'�-��. . -.4....... �:-'­._%',��.' ,,��;r. . ..:,, - - ,I. ,�;,�.I.- ­.".­ '�-' ,V`i , .", ,­­'AwM=WAjyXy Q_ ,�F,.� . . , .,�, .. , , --il -- 71�.. . ... ...�'. .. ::� -,.Z:­l C ,i��:Q,Z,,,i,,,',,i.,"�,I�,�" x, ��,:,:.,.$k'�','-'.-�,l�%,-:�,���;�.;,;'-�.�­�-ft.e A,- . - .�.,� , - . . - .. :",.,... 'T"Ili . -,� I -�::..'--..��'��'­.?�,.�- ��.'.',�' _-,�.. — �l I-- ,, ­i � �. .. ., . '. .,� , ; - �_"",r.­ - - ,;.A,;�_ t,"��i�s4-,�-,t,.:!�r�'�, ',,�,R", X.. � -�,;,::-��'Z;.,­_'��',,�-� . :-',� !�';t..-­, 1.-­ . , ... F ­ 11 - ..,��,i:�::� . � -4 ,,:,"�,llv,,q.� . w,,�'li .!. 11. . ..".. . .�. . ,,� :t�:�, _i.,. , , , �' " -III;, . - .,�,,.,�','."�-,�,�.�:;��:���,iZ,�',',,,�-�-,, ., . I.:-- 11 ': , " .. . . , %�._ - Q QQG"--v.."Q9",q, "- P_ ..- . .. .-,";, -.'�Z., ". . �. C KOKO " . � 1- ,-�- *110 rujM400.1"S,gj_,A,!. . .% ­T. X i..:,L��.� !;:.�::­,,�','. '. � , - , .... ��­'.. - _.:l <�I-,­",iN,�.yf�q.i;­��, .,­­�i_, ..�_l ,.!,!�,- w 'W"" � -, ., .� - : 4­'l..-l."­-,1. ,: ,�i Ij�!0,� -'.-'I.,, -. ":,,,.'-,j::,'J: , .e,�­t -­ - ` -.-it, --,.".I ,W, �1, 1. , _�:, . -'' i�-.� :�;;,:i -­­Q�,�­ "' ,;, :i �.,.,, ,. , ,-, v,!,,­�;-�F[;,.-,, .�_.._"W"M A.WW W.oil It W—yMn­1,z -� 'lrl_.i:l.,�,�,��_._ C.,,;.,; ,:�tl..I,I'll" . "­ -1 ISA-W.W, _% , , ,; , I -:��,�, ...:",- .� -�: "'!','.-,:- ", �I 1�"*t,',, �.Irl-.�lk i*r�l " ,1.1.,.!'�-, ,"-��-;;T,,�,i"-'%::.�i`:�,,,��'.�v �:..`� ,-�,,.":�:-�, . ,. , , - � ..,�­.,..-,...:;-, . -. ..�'j 1.L'.�,;,­,;'l l,.`e,:P4' , '..,-_­r-, - " .. �! .. - " 1,;I - , -11"._. , ..".6 -. ., - !', '..,z,:,Z a�.i.a I . . . ..��:�t,�, ,� ,"""�,�. �-,­ I .. . - I I. :'� .�:,�,:",��,, _� - . ..l.".�:,:':-,.,:;... I" `� . . - ., "'..,:..4-;".., . �, " , ,- ��,-'�... "T�:- . "._`:,�lpll I I I4,,��!,:"-:�-f, ,;i;.-':,� , �-:-"I'll ..il: ` ,��r, ',I , -,.,_­­1-., ,I .'; . -.1,., ,..I. .... ., 1­ "' . . -:,;. ., .I 11, ... . "'. :., 1­�v.t,"-�l i`,.�`:l"Ill."- -a"M y 1.� I--- " � -,�- -�', .. , -,... I . . "" _. "Us"N Vu I -�,�,�, ,� , I,` ... 4.�.l '!. �.-,,:" � -: ­� ',� : , r . ­1�i� m.. �. ':�.,11� ,,1. � I � . . Y­;�­,' ,.;1i,�'I"m l­ .1- .1 '. FIC .. - �. dwqj-no-, -xv j.',�", -'�,. '4--,--,�',:.-,%-,',,1 1 w 7my 146 I - -*: ,.,.l.%.;r--ii�.t- ,,� %q,':.:"r;) . . .­�.�,�.�'. , . ;. - � I.;. ,I a, -A - - "Z KA 1 W,__- o I�.Ikac. ,:ii.- y ,._i,- .. . . ,I 11 - . - �` :;,_,, ;,�,; - .: ......d_ 'a,r�".,4,��..--.-�:.,,��.,..ii F.i�.n,��,­:q, � - , . '_f,�'. ,, �,� %.-.,".."-7­_ -��I -, 1 . I 5::�'. *?.: ,­� :, '.. �I:- ���­..I - ,. - 1, I , _1 j , 'e, . - ." . �o . . ,�,., -� , -:�. �". ,t:�,. ,4 ,.''; -,,,; , --" f -� , 1, . � �, .�,, , � , _, . ., ,�,,z��r- ­j;i", "�� . �'i�l::. ., '.'.�;­,,,-�-�� 4 �� ­;�.", . .. , ­.­jv;r,wf. . �;. " _.,,%,,-'Fil?,-.�;-.,-_,)�r, ."Itiz-W`Fv)�kf,,"�,;"."?�,','.i�;�' "I'll,sw �.�� , '.- . , ; I .. ,"- � : , -a 1 1-V_�wj.� -f �t �,,,f ,,* - ............ ... .__..; , .... - , . ". - . , " . ;:�.,.,.':�".. , _f�,��­,N,�-!'. 1;-�-,11.,'­"� AL­�21�--A,I��. ,�y�,,�.�,,�;k.�*;�,�.,;...;...,,.;'..'�"-:.�t.'�,%,;,.,,�,.,,­;.­...,,.r � ,�,.'17tw �I " , %- .lj��.,_ . - �,�� .. .... . �lfl,�I._ . � , , -, . !��'�41'7je;�,"',Iii: x pynty gr ...Z. ,,,�W,FI I,�,'.'.ii,,A#l­-A?.%' I -,'.i�.,";,-, .� ,�_.�,_ .'.. 11 - :' .-�-�, �, ,�F. ,"_..o',.,.,'�. ,,:�, - I 1:11. � ili I. , .. -, . , I_ _,�"I.li �,�li�'!' ,�i';-,-, .� 1­74'.­,'­­­.��&4,, ­.1:1.- p", ., '' . g _�A ,,I--�Ii : ,� .��: Zgl :­-M.T, , - .. . `.. ";- . I '.� "��.�L _., - .,''.­'­_-, , ..�­I I .. . , ,���l..",�"ill--...-�7,k�.,r,-�'�,���,N A P"­-­­1 I.,,�.:I-�,,�;!,-"rt 1�;_ , 'N ..... : . I -F,,,, 1. � � . ..�, �. ., S I , i , ,,!'Y,,�,,�- .:. ��,,-:,;:t._. Z!,100 . ...,-- ", .," . :i. � ,�. I r,lt,f,�'7.�'."��-,,Z�Fj:q,ij�v�'-.Z�,' . . .... ..... " .� - - "� 1 ," !tl,':,_-_v,-,CI -1,U . N , -­­..­;,. ­:: 1_%�_.. , ,�� , . :'I:.:.I " �, . -"- ,.I;. ., �14il'�_��il_llill�??Zi'1*1,,�,�'Iil ,��z.�.%;,.�,!",.."�.-I��'..�'I.7�� -1`,�;�,:�i� ,;��,:ff-,,'�i�, - , . ,�­ .­ ,_- ­'e� ,�:,,�,?!.!,� .i�� ��.e, ��,!.-��,-:..:l� ll,:�i�.,;lt� 1�!."�.��1.� �"," ;3 ;-:;,I"� tt 1, ,w , ,-,"'i"g: ."', W�A" so= ,�, I -, A � - , - . -,W� .k ­0 'W,­-.::C,v-N� ""O',-i" - ,� i i�,�,w'� � " �� I... ... '-'.4 , _'4! , 5 ., 0 - 'C..�l,.Iil,".,-;��".��',��".,',10'-Ah�-�'--­ �,-k U­-­,.d�p-­­..i.,.-� .i.. .4-p",Ll;,N-dl:-,:0--�t­ .� . !'��.,1. ��,'_- � .I�' - - - -, �l p- , - :," .�.N i .,; �41tlll."' I W �i :­ �'�'.'::-`le�: �I": :": ,;,�i, 4,,A�z'.,'-.l­-`i%'P-� ;� 'Y'" ,, �N� . , .,- ..�,tl il� ��,,�.�­: , . ",_ � ,%�gt,,�lt'i� ..2`:�,,�I� . - . - . . ,f, . ,"'- ,4 T '1A 1;�,��_-`r�vl 5." *, ,-6��J, �j 7", , �',5F, - qq Q :I-" ,�� " � ., , .; - , � �,, k , .," S -4��--t ,04.r-,M��. ;�,,-�A,j. __ . - � ­;�'­"�­"­, ­, .. , .- - , ZL,�;;A -� �'4-` I., 1_"11�11"�,�-`.z��_­ , "' . ,. '11" _�� - , -,,�, . - , ".— ., .�!"..;�C- .. . . '., rl.�,� � , — ­ .;�­ :'-, ,r, , .... � .,v,.". : . —�:�,�._�.l !�-.. . . , - �n��� � �,.,_ , - - ." ".— ., .,! _;"- ',..;.,."­, ,;�t��,,,�1, ,L'. .�r, , ­._,'.:_4i.­?�, .'�.� � I. � , ,.,��,..11 11 I,j,li,�-��,:��,�,�.� �. 1.�..... ­:Z�ll. - ..,�­!.�lz_ .i�. ,.":. . _ I -, � ! , : t". � . _�,�:,!._` ,;U�- *- f *:,s- �,­,-,,-,;v,.;gr,�,w li.. ;WOW ',*­,:;� , LL � , .4, . " ,;::: ,,,C� .,'.,*,:-"f� � ­:­', �:.. ��gg s,-,. ,- ,4 -,�,,� , '4"'.­-­­1."', �, a Wit ,,�V,t< "I I ­. �'... � -�..;�,:� �Fil; ,- - ,. -. . . l . . ­.F. ­d. '� , r% It . .1. ...":i.""'..":''; ."" " IF." I .. ­ ��"' . , . ;.)q",�.l��"":,.,_-P, , h I " . .. ..,. 2,� '�; .,�. .. I . � ,�.� "Fl.­ ., . ,�, - �i. : I . ;.�,, �., . �: ",::�',", . .. , ." . . . � .111;;S!­�,:�_, .".-"' _;�,,,,;�,.Z.,. ", - __ , . "pl., ,. ��'..." , I , - , . __`,.. . , .111'..... - , ,?. !��,,.i,e.,,�;,, I" i�` .. ;�_- -�<�� " ll.il -111;1 -,L,1'?� , - - - E, , r I...,: -1","""""""""",""""""'.,., .. � r, , �, ,TY?Tyv&- . ­- -."it.. -, "."i'-.1111�-�`_- ."I,... � . �;"`;-N­.'z,`�7, ....-:1-,',-.� .� .�,, - . .%;:. ., � I .: . %:�_,"'­�4� Q; ,.t - ­�f - I �. ': . ,� 1, -.�-',��:,-,��: � I - -.-.11;.�­11.11'tf"; - . _',ri:64 , . . -5 � --I,-- -�., ­ " . "'!�� . ,4, ,.5 '' ; �;, , � � - - ...,­-, - �I I ;�,.; I ,": ,.:- , 'r. .. , , ��l',�..'�.�,�.,..,..",.,..,.�.,-,�..,.,,i7,.I .j... �. '.. � �'.�� , .1 , . Z: _111­" ­­.,Q,� . 4i ,, ".-1. "" " ­r.l. .1�� - . �l_. �. A , ,� I I: 1; " ,.� , .�!,�:��,,� , . I,;;�',�..­': .`.­�:�.­,, ��.,.­­­ ­,­.",1­;, A ; ,� ',,',,�� t,,,,,-.,:.7�,'­%:.l llo.1�'�'. .,�:s ,­�;,:!-�:, I Ij . " .�.`-..',. ,..-. ��.�7---,.--% "', ­..'�� ���.,�:f.;',.-.-, , .., , �-�.'!'----- -:.��"� '. " " -4P�ii`�-,�. �11"" �- -:;,�,�­'.,,�.I ,1� ,.." ­�;,::�. - 1�'� - a R-w-mll-, : _:�,'�,,'ii-:.�j.....1 :,� , :�., ,".. ,:�:� '" � .f. -��j-,,--- _`,�' � tit �'. '��:.�.-:-".1-5�,.�I,.1." ,��,�,��t. � w", �., - . . ��: , t� , z , "r� -,1­, , . . 7"�.!�F.,:.�'. , ,A,r�r�� r,,,!�4._ '... of Qw �­.. 4 , ,, �,- .q tqqi� 4 C, ­­ �..11:1­1_11. -,-�. �. - � . ."."', ,��:�,..- � : ,�� , :.,. ...'. _� � '� , - :::� ", " . . , . , ., --. ;�'. i,. . ­ " i , ,, .-!t-,i- ..:V i - . , 11, -,".. . .�; . . W. ,. ... I � : � .. . ,�: ��:,,�.� � ,,,, I. . ;.�: ,�� . .-- . �,:" I � -I . .. '. . . : . .. . . . . . - .1., ..1. I 7'.,> :, ,& ��A., . I., q. . . !:,��� ­ �. 'V_ ".1, ,� , -,I ,-..�-.1'.--.. - , , :s,�� � , . - -,. ,,, . -.��: �, :�­ �. .1� . - I � -..-, %.;�­.. "I' �_ I � . ;: 0 : . . . . I. ., . ",i� % .. .., .: �. _ , . - ­ .":, ,1­10 y 0: . � . . I . . . ,�at-0� - .. 6 . . . t.._�_.,�� ,, ..1, F. - .. . , I .. .. .� ,� . :,_ , . . � :,!� - . ,�..!.' .e - ­,", .. ., -�.�"A".%% ;.,,I :f! . 1-., . ." ,., :. .''. . :t.�','��.� ., '. ,:. .. ::.,-��`,::; � .,� 7-,".1:�, ., .". -1. . . . . : . . .-�:-� ,� . I� . . . . , . . Olt; W. - . .. . , , I .4 .:.'-' ,."', ... �1� . . . : . .... "; . . , ; . I 0,10A 1�- �:�� I w . � .�_ M , .. . I. ­ . . . ,. !. ., . , -, ,, , �K :on,,0 k �i. I : " ..;',i.�,�" . .%� . � . , . - -- I.,. ��: �­ '.,� - . .:: I'll 1. I .1. . . -- .�. ., . :, . , . . .1, , ..-.-,. l.l." � .. _. -�: . .,�:.:, . %�-,-,��-v ,, - - V­..-j-D i.. .�. ; ...',�,� , ..1,,-1, . .... . . , . : ; ,�....._,:�:;,t..'.i�;.I" .F.'", ., ,. , �-, ,� ,.­;�;!��.,,`,­,_ I ." 1. . � � ,.., .ill. � ,-,.�:�,`-,�_'_-al- . . " - -. - � - . .�. . ", �� n, . -- . " �i.. .... :�.-.�,l ,, _w . ., r�� ,".�,1; 1..i,I..," . 17'�. . I . �. I� , :�.'�'.�� �',,','.,,:.. S:-,� .�..,... :` , "� . I . �' ,. - . . ,. . - .;e, e. . � , , ,. . , . . , � - I'.. ,I- . *I .".., _1 . .'�"�_­,�'I 7 - ..,..�..,- . �;,...' _. 1. - .1, , ,� -�'­�.. .i :, `.-� - ...".-I., , � I �. . . . .. .�,;.. ��:_,�.�, , .1-l" -, , ,;.... ..i,-,.,:..,.,���,,,-.;,;.�."".". .',­:�. �, : , � ,� . . .... -- . ."­i�,,�I,F,,.,;�..�� . I w-� I -�,.4�t�� -" .- �:,!,�. ..--� .. .- .. � � R%,I J""o �, . .". 1-i'* .:;.,�. I. . 4­;.. - .:.. .11 ,.!,*., ; ..� '.�. . �. , . ., - �:. , - . , � �� - . � ­�,­­Ji , 1,; 11 11-- ... .-l. . ,- I -,11.. ,,..,:,, ,�:,� ,,-% -­ ,, -�I� .""�.; , . W -, ....7,�, . , ... , �z;,...E � Z­ ,,,", - " ,�­'.t�.;`� . 1-1, ,­­ 7 - . - ,:-q , MI � . . . .. ,, .,� . � . , , .-. I ., "-".:",.1'.�,,i�:"� ,� , .,- �. , . - . , I i"', t "�`, : , _��,.�i�i% - I...:., ­­,� -1,'�%-'4 . �-,.,I ,.:." ..:. ".., ..'I. .. 11 '.9) -,., , `it; ,�.' --�' - . . :_ '.. - . , , ,�-, ,. _� -,.:v�-:7 ­:.� '.li�ili '" .i - " %��,',v---� I ,,�,�, " _11 , ,o.t. ,;� -1'... . ­ ; J." �::'_ .'- ;,;bf 4 0,�ll ,-��-_�:` I ", 4.1­-,'��, :. ­;-�g�iP:�'. . .:.,... -.'i�,'...�.. .. .. - !:�`."�l.N - - , .A"- - ". .;;;;;;,,-, , -1- 11Z , I�. � �, . I. . . - .� -1: , V, . �,,�.k . - t!­7!: --i'�-t:-_', . - - -� I .-..% .- . . - . . , �:'i� - ,-, -`�!`- ., . . , , ��..-�� . . .. : :, � � 1'n,, " .*r , ; ..,6 �_�,`,-�.-I�,%,�! A . ­r,. , -,�"i, '. �',. j�:. �. I ;; . . �J - , , . - , 'It. �� ._._ . . �4'.�,:, . . I .� i;_I.11. � �­ - - ..I.; .. - .�. ;,I:1.. � I . , ":,�,�;'�,�, .1 ", . . �� .I ,- . ­.',�­..._ "i .1 W!,0_�I . ,_,�t,,�.�,-,,,� .� , :- .',jt.�-,.:�_,_:�.",., -,-1 -­­ , .-�I­�.� , , I ­­­­�-.."-; . , , ,,.� - _�i�I,:_,­ ., - ,��," ,.�.. '.._"%.- . .. - '. . �,Z,�.,.; ... �?;�,,'t�:,t--�,:,:�,i�r,77, ., -­.;�,. -..".-�Z.,- ,�`T"-"P . , i.111 ��A - ...,. - . ; - . � ,�k..:��:r ..7 - � .. P.;­�.�%", , ., .,�, I vift.A. WN,�'i�'!!�<�,.l ,�:.. — .., . i j,.r%. 'J'­ , , . . - ", .��, "...);.,� , - .077 ::,._',-, :: -T'.l':i.1'.1. . ..�.... �r-�­I:;;­; -,,,,, .:f:,. .1�1T.­.'tt"'., , ..; !:,. . :.., . , I� ;t" ` — ",;? 1.";­,-`iZ,l:-.." . . ,.-.��.:_�. - , . I - ..'' ,-�,�"....''.,..,-.,",.��.i,i;-"I-F""','Xt. ­_ ­v,;�F-,,','+l.. ."-!.;,;-,��'c,;',..",.�.'��,,',,'--��",-,!;,�,'-.-'�"";��"� .. . . �: . - A . I,.,,: ., .,."� ,� .�,11­11 ,V­ 1- �'k!.4,.01'-. I,�i­W,,l '' , . , ; Q,-07, ..­%.�1. ­:. � .. 1--r?"I'lonywopw I � ­f. .­;- - , _r,--&M_aRw"- . `:�f`:_..�7.'_ ��;, 1;­, . ,� ,q,:': I . ".. 1, ­ .__ .� wwvw. w=fR'..7:,��l',.-' .i��)3.�,,�.,,�'-V"�"",-":�;,C;,.�,-� .. ., .. ;- ... ..�.� ]�:­­,..,.1 F., ."",.;,.," .,. . �:'�,,� '.. . ..: !t, �i��'.-'�:� q 1 v­jQQ N Q� ­ cli-l-ill ,. ­;�',."le". . "-" .. A , . . , ., ... .:.; ­:-y-Q-jyq","Qwy"," .- .. '.,":.�',, ,'­��-x� '11".'...,,-,.':,;,��:,.:-.n�. �S - .__­;,�A T�_. �.-m " ',�f -�,N.", ��, ,�� 44"Alyn f0m,GQAQ Q - , . . '' - !�;;-� ',,-_­. , " -..a,' �.:.!.,.,7- � ­`,.; . .1 �y ,�zi,.:.-:,;�:.��i.-.';,�".-.�, ,.i'm4 , . " . _%j.-._� ,�,��, - . , .... - "-� :;: �_.- �4, ­�,f:, 'Z`�. � ;."".,- .,�!�',�l-'.7"1�.��---��!i.,4:�;..;-.,':.;'�,��:�,', ,.�;:..%�.',:: .�, - ,'.l.­.,-,-.:- - . ..."...,�.�w­'­:,41­,�......_-L,.:!!.l'v­ . ;t�'!�,,. -�,.h��:.­. I-. - I I-.­­- , ."." - , . 1. 4��`­­1'.',-.,­��',jlkl,i:�59: .4F,".. - .. , � � ,, -,'".. ,(/­- -­� I-, I- . 'iI: �;.11l . ... -...--l' M N­ 'W" ._v_Q_" IN I " 5 W'.I-- .��,�...: , -" -.1.-­;- "' .."4..t- -- , ��,l .;,.,. ':�,�.­.',�2'. -"_"?­"-"­gflM,.­­, ,W� a- " ...z. - � ,-,zZ, _�­_o­ .. , " " -�-:T:i���".'.i........ :., 1­. '.,..,.,. .. .. . . ;3'.."­_....�.. .� ��_� . � .,:;;.i;" -, -.4,_� I, ..""p, . yQ Q,,M,-,-,,-"t., , -� ov- - 7-�4 ­ N. �` ` :_....,�: _.,�..�::;,!.' - . ­� .- ­,­ iN'11`11 ."I'. ,�; -� , � ._ I I,I.,r ,�,,,� , , - , ta5-, - - i *-,;-,.;,,.-,.,l. I - ,."I t,,� . ,.� - ,"7��`;.,;'%`,�,!_� .......;,�-,:,-'!­ 'i't 1� .­,,; - "A. K.,._­\L,­ - -- '� ,"I., '. � iz,lz-$,'�i;�,'� ':�-,f.­!-,;� ,� ��'""t�;'." .� - ., , . ­�.;::�qt�l�j..'�_U, -, .% �_­,!-,,.�, :,�,,:e.-_- , - , , -1,­'-f-, - .:�'. -,,,�,��t;­.,- _. ,-;,' _.".'�-.tn�;I,- 1"a-i� ­_L;.wQ0Q : 2 : 44 " M"o-wowww"IT.H. I I I . ... .. ... F.;,t t�i',r4x,, , �'.v ..� . . ,. ..,i,.-,,..,-�,---..��.,�'.'���,,��: ��I- - - --:4-":l '-�y'�' _.�,�: - .� -�f.; ,� I' . - , , ­ -- - - , , ,�r ,;�F.-'_��,. I �,.;�,,, .,�I�,­�5nf�"­,�.!,.,� -i_­!�f,.; �,�' - 11 ­ . , I.," - '. ,�,��;?-...'�I---,'lo ­'.�,,-�I,i - �_ ...� .. % ;, � , ; "'Am�;�, . - . .1 ,4��,� . "�.,. - - . . .;',.-�:,- 1�N��,�.-, - ". . . . �-,�.-%�� .�.:� ,­�_,-.-,,.,--.- ­ - -�- - - -,�,,.-.�.,�:.:.t...*r,,,'i,��','�."�",.j,� -;�;, ­,��:,., ;" � '".: *�. �!'­, ­i;`,v.,,--4,'.:Ze:, ,i.,,:,iw ,,��,i--. f.,:.� ,,,,.%,"�".�1...":... ..%,;�, �i., _­...� . , I -�J,� -.1.. % ­.. �� , . . ��­ .. : .. .- - --� -".; , .,,i�-­.,� �:1,� I..., ': �,�,'� :.-,.:. , -��,;.T,,:F,,".,.--� - . , . ,::.�..'. �..­ 11­1.1',.,L"�4 ':, , � �,.,v.%, �:. ... , " , . :�.. . ,:� ,��. ,, :,j . . .". . _',!�":. ,:" �. , ., . . ( I�,.% �;�L,:",r,,.'� -j, ,, .� , " , - , . . .. . . �': � I .. .4, � . . , _!�:_ _':>_-'��.-i_ , -� ,4-, -4 -.':��,�,_'I'.�illi: . -- *-,- - -, .� - , * - '.' ,. ---.;!�:z'�it���";���"-2,�,.�,."".� 1: _�,..-..'�..�,,.�.­_..��:­-� -',.'�� .�� ,`,�,,- ,'�,..:��:n�-q IiAz..;;..'�j��'.IF2',-. A;- -�, ,. ,I- �Fi%. ,, . - , _­ ­ - Z ::. .'.-,'., - . - . . . g .-, , �.-,,­;,�,,I -,.­%;� t�,.;, , . "" . -1.I... -1 � . ;.. ,._�­�.;i­.'., ,.,Z..,: - . - � ,­­;' , .: . ,. ; � , � . . r ?t.,�,,�..f... .­ L J.... - ..- -;".7 .,....� :. . :.w".."-11--m.p,- �. ., ,I . �j�i;�11,,,,�-';.'­. - �, _.�.. —-_ 1;1�`.` - :.��,. ti��,­V,-'�,3�:�.i!; ,"fl, ': 1,N.-1:1�. 1. . � �_. �. .1 "Mmy - ., I � .,,- � -I--::�,';�,i� IF �-.-,;���, .. `4�F� -" ,.% - , ��_:v-. ,;­�! .'­.­..�� . , ­�-�,.IW,� .,. ,���,'._�-�� . .�.;..,..,ll�. .:. . . 1- - . ,, . - ,`-- .��." ,i�.--�-.V.t,%�­.-,�,I . , , 'I - ,. �,,;n�*.'_4',,�:I,­­�, -.�.t_i,..: r ..'... ,.,,.,,��, :..-'; r -4,,�',­�­. �_�:7,� - 1 QQ�Av . ,�"., . .1 ,.,_. .,. ,,­­­-`.­;..,,..�­ �: ..I , - , , QW.M.Wn ,:.. . � , , . . � " 43W,� , 1:�...;�:Z­," " .;1�', - . . �Tw - � ,!w0j'A ". ... , . , - ;,--��:-� P,- -,�,'.,'7t.N ,z-,,,,� . � !.N V.."K. 0""" "I"" -p"w%-Ryw .. . . .. . .�tf4.,j�`�.%_��. "��k�,�:�,�.:�­, .. . -Z.l.,vZ:l "� �.':� :".. , , , . '. ,� 1 . - , -���_,.�... - :�n"MA9", .1,-_n-00, .. 4,,jjAlTnM> ' '',- , i.l:.� " !_' .� . " -,:� --,f,z,:­.. . . , . ,!v. ,-4.;�.-. Y� :.�,� , , , , -."�,, -.. ,__, , . " �Q_ . -, , . . , -. - ""'- - -" . ��`­ W"gw -, , -" " -; .:.� L"..� , K.� _�, - - � , ,;_4i,, . t/.,_,., . ,,.�:::�1,..::­,il, . .1. .... .,.-:.. " :.'�. N NXIS son 1, WIA TWIl"pl,, . I.,. , - - :, -t- , ,; � - ..4,,�,,�.I"tl­." I�_ , , . - - ,f�.-,. .. . . ­....,�, ...­. - .�j_ - .". 0 ,- '-'i�-,.;.,---,'� ,. .1, .. .: - . ..,--,"�t?'....-.: ",- - ,WQQIWIS-W"� .4 4wn A a 6".�Wwyv, % . - %,� - I �,; . _.-,; . ._,,,....".,.. ,.. - , , "'., ."' - , .;,.il,;�::., . . - . , :.::�,�i.!-.�:- ."..11;� .:I..,�.:..I"..1�,>-T-R­N " - . � ., ..� . . ., . ,, ­� . ;.j-r4-,4,4,::,. �. ...w, ..'i.% -�,. .... . '. , _­.- ". . -. � . % .; �. �,.: .,!: ,:1.��.",�,­."z",�',_4, ;­!! � ?.:",:"', ,;.,.:,".�:_��,;�. . , ,- , 'T ," , , , --`:,-:., . � , i, . - , I I - I., , :�,,-;!��­-­':.-_, ,�I` . - . .�,�,�,t!,�-`F' .. I - .. . .. .. .. ,� _.­ PC 0�ow"A"44�. n�� �`�;"`-if�,_ 11 ATTAW� :­"`� -- .�,:� � , n ..." ,__ M7. � .. �. a , , �. : .: ;�:-..� :": I-,, :,;: . .. ,.,;_-,,�--. "...".7�." ., , ,-,F,'; �_ ,�, �. .. . .,. , . ;"I'l." ."":. '. � .t, , ..". -,I ". - . . � � ,.. .. . . , . �__ .. '. .. '!, '....". r...".... 4.-�Al­, 1�,��­�vt:�,� , - . . �4:'. .. � . ,.,�z '.,�/,._... . - � , ­ - :�',:�.­�,�e, " .::,:".!.,.,,'., .I "._ . � , , ... . . ., . . , .�:,.-. - .. ., ­-,. - , - - ,, 1 �.;- ,�.7?� , .�._­: � 'ivl;-_ .."....­.... .,.%-i,I,I L�.��-�::--.`_7;n�,*7......1._:.. . -I.- .r . ,- 'W .. Y.- :­% I _: ��O� vs,,,, ,�.'­ ...� . ". ,,,,!'',,..,.%.�'.._­ -WIN, -smown-sm _- ,'�. ,�rc,.;�,.:'­,l - ,;-f� � :., .. - :, . �-::i"�:�I' . ,'-- , �, ..lF.,":,�l,"- � �,,�,,� I .... , ;__."�­.t"', ,� 1, , " :�,.,i.�'..-I,,'.'.�,,:,-�� -7 -,t�:-.��,.. .���%.� 144�---gu, -,.,...I­' � , -, . - .."�" � w"% �yg:-_ -C-� _Q'.nx�� ,�.. .,�:�,,� .l.i`,.,­`:.."�;,: �.._._­; .�:' ._::'.� !:,. . I . . . . -i-.,F-_- . - " 1:1.:­,": ­._ .-- .1 � ,�'­�.. ".... , ­­*k­,� 'i-- IF,,�§ , , ...,,1. 4i_. . , �'. . .�:. -2.1, - '....)3..l­-;,,,,,, ."'. . �. . �- , ... �. :f.... :: .. . - I;­`iz�g­ __ ; ­----.-,.' '.."I ­.­­,"-­- "'i�, ... , - :, �,,,,,,,-,�-..,�-:'7.,-".,:� p.I-­�141:i.0�...� . . . , .� - - � , _­.­';1j,". : '. ,.::-.-­`l-- ", - . . . ,A�i�. _. - _;­,-,l,­, .. ��Z, ,"'."..!�-, � Q t, �1 '.;..;..,�'. ",�.�i: �-I?,.-,:,*�! .. ,,.7,..il,:,l'�..­_- - ­.tl ­,".,_­;�''. '�-­ .; - �j_I-q " n .. .� . , ­f_'.f�t"­,,, .. � , -I-,--.- ..... .1-1 .1-1. '..,,.,�,t, '. '.�� ,��,,�� : �, .,- �,.�- � , . ,."� - , � -. . , ,� .' ....,r-::, . .:��-.",;,.,:��"-".'..��;,7:.,..'��z',�,:"�--,��,-- ��,.,.,,, i " - ". .. . .`--,"-�� , . � ,� : : - ...� ,. .�,�r, -�­,­:. ­7:,:.:,-":�.. .. - " . , . �0:;:...' '�;, ,. -"­ . . - :::� ��'... . , � .", .. : � . .�.�:j-, : , , . . -11 .- . ; . .., ":I .. I. , , "4�! _­ I � ..,::-... : . ." ..� ,, .,: .. "I:..., . -111.1 ..�, - .. I ;w, , ... �':. ,:,:,f!:, -,-, . ­F 7 _::; ,,�­ , , , I . , , . . ..'' . . �';�., `,-�' ,�,i,,: �I-".Z:"r p I I � .."Is.", .., .7 , ­4'_`.� I-- . , . -� ,� ,� -,5x­i:, .��., ..%,- '! ,.,.,�.... ,- - ., I . .. .. !�, .,,�.,,] . . 7� , . , . 1. . . - ';:' ,z �, - 10 �,%�.�.`., ,:,, .... ",,�..;_-�-v r­ . . I:; :,.i., I , . '�_ - , -�;-...'..,- .,.;, .., . �. , .� ;,_., , .: . 1:. .. �i ,�_.;,'.._;'. ��,;�., . ....; ,ti,�,t�; .,. _: - ,;:,..'.�';'.. ;.. � ­.;;��,_,-­,.. -I_,7.­�z. ,�;- �, . , �:� ��'" .".I � ,,:": , - . . � - - .11 , . ,T.-.0.li.:ll��I ; . . . . ., .l."., . I -, , . --�­�'�'. , . ,.,.. � :,-.1,­ , - .. '. . . . , . . . '.. . - , , . .��,­�.'.-- .... _ - .., ;- '.­!.,�'o�t' 1. ,. .- . .. .. , , : - - . - . . ", ,:.-1 I. . _:': . � . I. �.,; !. "" T .� iX I �l I , ,t: "! - I ,it t "I , �7� 1 ., I � � ���', �, i.i . -tgz, �R,-�,,A�, - , iZ -, '� t: .��f'. ', I 1. 1 4 1 " , I ,-, , `�'" � ,A, , -" ,f�'i,N I. - , "' I I` �;�I - 1-1, �­ 11 11 .. - I r.. ,,','�� I. - �,��.. , � � � - �, i . .. I � i ,. ,� I , , : _. .� �: , , , �; ., i � L .. I.:-1.1 I-,�:;.,,,­l,',:.. .. .. '. .. " �. .1� . � . .I.J..". ..�;�" , ..,­. .,.'..:i,- . .. ,t-- ,.:__ :_ ,::j'' �.�.11ll ­i ,, , - -V- .. I. ,. . . �":":�'...l..;,.� - - � -. . . , _.__ :."-"i�::,_-.Z"'.- ", ...- ?. - � ,�., .."",F : . !�.*,:� - � �. .. . `.'� , "'I. .. ,� ," ... 1: I ywwvw�- I',,, _ . ., -:,, �: -.�.". . . : �_ �:, .. .� . . . � . ?'�'� ""',", I I , _� .� . ,.�, :...�' .. , . ­­­­ ��, . .". �:. . , -" �. i� '. "'....., .7 .,vl,- . I'l-1, -. . , -:� , . ., , .-,',,�..'.-� " - "4,:,," ,. , .,,;, ..� . ,.,C. . I: .1 . �­;­�'.i,-,�..�­;. j.; ..I -"..'. " � ., �l . bv .P.." ,e t- I!,. ;,,�;� ,�,.�­: :� ­�.,­�,,.­­,_­� . ,..�.:,;'. , .-� t:, � !�: :.���� ,, .. : �.:­ "'. . �,%,, .:" .... ; -, -.`�-_,...: . - I .I. , �� , . . . . ... :d- , . , .... , - . ,�commony?g,,,,, I��a. �"Qqw AS= ,:­ -.-,­��,�'�t.-... �,;.�":-11.1-1­ . .. . � ., ; , I - . � - , - ,I"..�­­ .-Ill , ,��i". ..-:::_­.... I . ,�,�7��,',',.-,"�-.!4,:�'.r.--.74,ti,,���f�:��.��,4 " -- . ,.,me ME��:7�, ;:., .�.' . ...- �, , :� � . %. '."�­,g-,... ...'__...,��­�:I5'�".r3�,`;,t..E�:.'.,� %,,,� ,;� -,�,-,.-,­ . . :�":A": P-P", ,, A0 , ,��:, ... .. , �� , �" ..,-i ,:., ,i�"". ­ , . �_.­�"..;S - 11. '.t�,�,,., ', --- ,,:, , . , -... . . I , - - " ,.. ..". ., . , . -,�.. .,p - `,',:.',:',,',z,�'.-�r-.,,��",�v -.�.' "., ��.,,�'��-,,,:.'.,-!,,',;,,�,-",..,,r , �' :.. .� -"'. - , I .. .:...." t. .::.-,'.-,.--r� -"I.­:j't,',. �1, � � " . . � ':- ,_'�'i�,��,t,--,..'.� ;.1 I-, �� ." - . . .- . , , 't, - ...; ..;.,., - �,­�,-,�� %, i:.! . , .: . , I ..,�_ .i,.,.��., ;:, :,_ - . ''�,.,., ,% .. .''. I ., , ,-,, -!­ . .. . -, � ���-, :'� - ­r; -'�;� ":`� .' 4..".".,_�,�I"..'' 'r, ."".-,,.,.'' �� ,�.,'.�-,-� I,I. il:.1;l I .,., " ,- .- , , �,,,�,,,,�,, ,, .. .... . . �11 � ,,� . . ­a�i'�-"­. I I . . , - - , . " ,,� 1�� . -"L%-7 . ', "..."".7.- . , , . .e. ,.t,���q-;.:-,�. .. ..,.,.��" .. ... - , . - " . �.., ,", ....,_;.�:, ,' .''. - i.., ..� .._.: r.. - , - '. ...� ..'_......;,.::--�:.�_':% ;l�,.,. ,�', . ..,_ .. - . ., � - .;.­,��­.� .. -1.-N,1.�- �4_.�. ''.t,�. , .� �. - ��� ..i�-,:'.:4 '-!�� �l�� ,�". , � :. . , , . ,"' o�, , " "�" ,,-, _", , , , , 1;* ;, % .� .., k..,." _ ,. , .I . `_,"', 11 . . .. I - ` - _- ";... ��'., .. �...:_. Z:,...,.. �.._.,.:� �� ._�.."�".� ,.:� "- -1 , � . . . -­­� ", �t - . , � I �`­,-,I :, ..,.1 . . : ,:;�;i�,:77": :1 ..',..,� '%­.,.'­ �, ., , -i.. :,;" ­,,,�T.?% . , ".� ,f., , �� I 1-1 . '... . I -� I �q. .., :�, _:..�­:,,�`%��.,, '." . - , - . . . ��­,,,, ;, ... 1. , . . �"4,fil., 11 - �ie-­`�­­, -j :���A ;.7 1 A- I I ". - ". �.�a � , -.11­,�, .�� �,­­Z,,,,Q��Z`­ ,;a 7 . _­I-e'__` I . .�L" ,�.,.; ,,��­�,­ .. ;-,�., ,, . "..., ... 11 - I I -��.; ...�� , .:. " �,',,. , , .." ;;n, � .-)."�: .. - . . ..,.,I"...;:- - ...w-OW W- " p- ­p- WwAy" 0-- - .,. I �Qwj --�­ 0S­&"Www WOW-RIVWMT ME Ims �1�1.1 �, I _�._" ��l .. ,i�,:,,.,%. -:,,­,:��, . ,,r,l�1' 1_6_­­;__ll__ -­Qym .�QQ WW4QQ"-lw -MM-1 aho -.................. " .v , . - .­. ,1,1;,�I,, .1, ��,.�_ ffin - ,% , .� ...17............. , , , , ,I'm ,� ... % -,�, ­'-, ", t w a,�la-i5 �,:.,�&*11�1�_,"3 �'­.��­�";',_llt 1-1 '��"�_�. _,:.7:.l`l, .���.1-1-1."",-,�,�l.,.,.,-""i,f �`,,;',�',6,! ", �: . I � 'F1 'F1 -. 'F1 � ,�_, �,,.,,xc %�: , .Fl 22222 i i; ,2z -, , � �i �! d � s } Y' � .r r..� .-�.�:. .-c+' . i � � ` ' n ,: � Y M .. .•j x:.� i { .. —r ., � �, ;"Fir "f,'Y � _ - ; � � .. �. 8 r (� �i . .y' t . . � , � ' �.: - .. � :: V. q .. r e.�„ J •—._ -..._.,� fro, .r..-..^ �•,.,..,,+.,, k"'2 7r { 14, _rf 1 �1 i 1 � I G ' zE. v I I r , } a } Wt . tF 4 . r t � r &1 ♦ i i i w J J { r i w y f r ''t s M1 . 1 , r Y ISTATE-OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY RONALD REAGAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS .® DISTRICT 7, P.O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 90054 October 31, 1972 �, aF HUNFj��'A© 7-0ra-1 18.4 $ N � Re: Your letter 10-17-72 �. 9�ORNV Mr. Don P. Bonfa City Attorney City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention Mr. Ernest Gilbert Investigator Dear Mr. Bonfa: Attached are two copies of the District Engineer' s approval, dated October 27, 1972, of Resolution No. 3589, passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach on October 10, 1972. Please arrange for installation of the proposed sign as noted in the Resolution. Very truly yours, CAROL J. SCHUMAKER District Traffic Engineer Traffic Department JWG:ie Attach. s e RESOLUTION NO . 3589 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH .DIRECTING THE PLACEMENT - OF A SIGN ON THE BICYCLE TRAIL AT THE APPROACH TO THE SANTA ANA RIVER BRIDGE ; WHEREAS , the City of Huntington Beach desires to cooperate with the State of California and the City of Newport Beach in establishing a safe bicycle trail across the Santa Ana River bridge ; and r: The State of California has granted permission .to use certain state parkland as a part of a bicycle trail '.system r. upon condition that the City of Huntington Beach erect a sign : r at the approach to the Santa Ana River bridge directing bicy- clists to dismount in order to cross such. bridge, .NOW- THEREFORE, the Ci .7 Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve that the Director of Public Works shall t; cause a sign to be placed on the bicycle trail at, the approach to the Santa -Ana River bridge , which sign shall read: ` BICYCLISTS G- The law requires you to dismount and walk your bicycle across ' bridge sidewalk r: PASSED AND ADv'PTLEjL by the City C :;ncil of the Ci';y Of .. r Huntington Beach at a regular meeting-. the--r-eof held on the 16.th day of October, 1972 . �� �____ _ ..�._._ ._____._ ___ ._ - t 4. s"} c Eng4A�er / MCP ♦ r c l Tj/ 02' ATTEST: "AP ROVE AS 0 ORM: 7:.i:: approval k rr,a;',e p:%ttoanf ?o cur-_nt I .- • .... FrO.T ?F ail Lt PJ6It l.' 4. City Attc._ ney E Res No. 3589 n STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I MAUL C. JONES the duly elected , qualified and > > y acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex- o•fficio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby ;? certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of October 19 72 , by- the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: 3 Shi le Rant Corr, . .ibbs., Green, Matney, Duke., NOES: Councilmen: None a� ABSENT- Councilmen: None City Clerk and 6x-officio Clerk of the, .City Council of the City of Huntington }leach, California ' 5 s rP ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL 0 .I. City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CA61F-ORWA—USae #�{ -A.PPROVF- 3I;Y CIi CtivNCIL —_— ----------- TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council - - •----.�.-. CLLRK FROM: Recreational Trails Committee DATE : January 31 , 1972 SUBJECT : PROPOSAL FOR RECREATIONAL TRAILS IN HUNTINGTON BEACH (Summary) History Citizens ' committees have met monthly since April 1971 to develop a proposal for recreational trails . One committee organized the very successful Bicylce Day in May , and held the public meeting on January 13 , 1972 which was attended by more than 150 interested people . Goals for each 50 ,000 residents for today ' s 130 ,000 residents Bike trails . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 miles Bike trails . . . . . . . . . 60 mi . Footh paths . . . . . . . . .25 miles Foot paths . . . . . . . . .60 mi . Equestrian paths . . . . . . . 5 miles Equestrian paths . . . . 12 mi . Objectives and Implementation 1 . All plans shall coordinate with county plans , and plans of neighboring cities . 2 . Bike trails will link major educational centers , parks , civic ter , and recreational areas , especially beach , 3• Foot p shou e a a — eb— conee�ted . to high schools and college , with considerable use of larger park sites . 4 . Equestrian trails should link stable areas in Huntington Beach with the county trail system along the Santa Ana River , using off- street easements where possible . 5 . Two or three phases of development are proposed . Costs estimate for Phase I implementation 60 miles of b ke trails . . . . . . . . $73 ,000 60 miles of foot p.aths . . . ... . . . . . 15 ,000 12 miles of equestrian paths . . , 50 000 Total 138 0 commendations 1, Adopt phi osophy and goals of recreational trails as proposed . Support the concept that the Recreational Trails System be recognized as a high priority item in city planning . Appropriate $138,000 in the 1972-73 budget for implementation of the initial phase of the Recreational Trails System . Adopt the basic principles , and any necessary zoning , for each type of trail . 1 . 1 PROPOSAL FOR RECREATIONAL TRAILS IN HUNTINGTON BEACH ( Summary) Cont ' d . - 5 . Consider plans for recreational traisl in the development or redevelopment of parks , flood control channels , freeways , high- ways subdivisions and beach front. Appoint a Recreational Trails Committee , including representatives of each of the three special interest groups , and appropriate city commissioners and staff, to develop detailed three-phase master plans , including all costs . 2 . 1 PROPOSAL FOR RECREATIONAL TRAILS IN HUNTINGTON BEACH Recommendations to the City Council of Huntington Beach 1 . A . Adopt the philosophy for Recreational Trails as outlined in this report . B . Adopt the goals as outlined in this report . That is , for each 50 ,000 residents there should be : 25 miles of bicylce trails 25 miles of foot paths 5 miles of equestrian trails 2 . Support the concept that the Recreational Trails System be recognized as a high priority item in City planning . 3 . A . Appropriate $138 ,000 in the 1972-13 budget for implementation of the initial phases of the Recreational. Trails System . B . Contact county , state and federal agencies and elected officials and discuss our concept , to solicit moneys for its implementation . We believe that this total concept is the first in the United States , and thus financial help may be forthcoming . C . Consider recent ligislation (SB 1100) that says construction of bicycle lanes and paths are a highway purpose under Article 26 of the Constitution , and thus are eligible for gas tax expenditures . D . Use land and income from the park and recreation dedication or fees required by subdividers to help finance land acquisition as appropriate for recreational trails . E . Direct the City Attorney to explore legality of imposing tax on bicylces and bicycle parts sold within the city ; revenue to be used to implement bicycle trails . 4 . A . Adopt in general the master plan outlined here for bicycle trails , subject to revision by the committee described below . Incorporate this into the City General Plan . B . Adopt the principle .that foot paths should connect the Central City Park with as many schools and parks as possible . C . Support the concept that the stable area be connected to the county equestrian trail system along the Santa:,:Ana River by means of Edison easements and flood control channels , or other off-road paths . D . Recommend zoning to allow equestrian trails to be functional . For example , appropriate zoning for a stable area , and quartering of horses in residential areas should be adopted . 3 . PROPOSAL FOR RECREATIONAL TRAILS IN HUNTINGTON BEACH Recommendations to the City Council of Huntington Beach ( Cont ' d . ) 5 . A. Consider plans for recreational trails in all phases of Central City Park . B . Consider development of recreational trails , especially hiking and jogging , along the bluffline in Huntington Beach wherever possible--such as Bolsa Chica area , and between Adams and Yorktown . C . Consider development of recreational trails wherever there is building of new flood control channels , or with the rehabilitation of existing channels . D . Recognize that freeway and highway development and redevelopment must consider all existing or approved recreational trails , and provide safe transportation for bicycles and other non-motorized traffic. E . Consider recent legislation (AB 265) which states that sub- dividers of more than 200 home tracts may be required to provide separate bicycle paths within the tract development . We recommend that this be mandatory . 6 . A . Appoint a Recreational Trails Committee to develop a detailed three-phase master plan , including costs , which conform to the outline above . It is hoped that the plan would be submitted to the City Council prior to July 1 , 1972 . It is further hoped that Phase I be started prior.: to January 1 , 1973 . B . For planning , implementation , and community input , it is suggested that a six-member Committee be appointed that would consist of: One person each from citizens representing bicycle riders, walkers and runners , and equestrians One city staff member each from the Recreation and Parks Department , Planning Department , and Public Works Department . C . It is further suggested that the staff work be assigned to , and carried out by , the Recreation and Parks Department , with support from other departments where appropriate . 4. PROPOSAL OF THE COMMITTEE TO IMPLEMENT RECREATIONAL TRAILS IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Philosophy We believe that a Recreational Trail System in the City of Huntington Beach will enhance the quality of life of its citizens for years to come. A. The system will provide for widely accepted and widely practiced recreational activities such as bicycle riding, hiking and jogging, and horseback riding. B. The system will provide a means of transportation which Is independent of the internal combustion engine. Thus, it will reduce the production of noxious pollutants which endanger health. C. The system will not only tie together business locations, but it will tie together our park and beach systems, thus enhancing what is already one of the finest recreational programs in the county. D. The system will provide cohesion and identity for Huntington Beach. We feel this is particularly important in this age of urban sprawl where cities like ours virtually "disappear" into the megalopolis. Needs There is an increasing need for recreational trails in Huntington Beach. Presently there are no established approved marked trails for bicycles, foot travel, or horses in our city. Many paths are used by tradition for certain purposes, but are not designated on any map as legitimate trails, nor are they perhaps the best trails. Of the 400 replies to the May 1971 Sands coupon, more than 50 per cent indicated high priority need for bicycle trails in Hunting- ton Beach. There was also good positive support of the Bicycle Day (250 people) and the Recreational Trails meeting in January (over 150 people) . There are an estimated 80, 000 bicycle owners in Huntington Beach now--20, 000 to 26, 000 of which purchased their vehicles in Hunting- ton Beach in 1971 (bike sales are big business now--) Over 1500 high school and college students ride bicycles to school each day, and probably many more than that to elementary school--this of course being a an portation use instead of a recreation use. Huntington Beach ranks high in the quality and number of distance runners and cross-country athletes in Southern California. More than 200 7-14 year olds participate in the Recreation and Parks track program, and many more in their local schools. More than 150 boys in high school are in competitive cross-country track work, bringing many honors to our city. The cross-country and physical fitness programs at Golden West College involve about 90 people a year. The number of horses in Huntington Beach has more than doubled since January 1971. There are presently more than 700 horses, and over 2000 riders living in Huntington Beach. We must respect the needs and rights of this fast-growing group of people and develop trails for their use. 5 . Goals We strongly support the memoranda of October 8, 1970 and November 12, 1970, by Mr. Tom .Severns, Development Coordinator of Huntington Beach which include the following standard for each 50, 000 residents , Bicycle Trails 25 miles Foot Paths 25 miles Equestrian Trails 5 miles For today's city of 130, 000, this translates into Bicycle Trails 60 miles Foot Paths 60 miles Equestrian 12 miles. For Huntington Beach at saturation with 250, 000 residents we should logically haver Bicycle Trails 125 miles Foot Paths 125 miles Equestrian Trails 25 miles ObJectives and Their ImRlementation A. Bicycles 1. The attached map shows the plan as it would apply to bicycles. This plan is coterminous with that proposed by the county, and does make connecting links with our neighboring communities. 2. Development--Phase I- 60 miles Identification and warning signs $15, 000 Street marking--disks, lines etc. 8, 200 10 miles of 2-inch thick, 4-foot wide paving required 50, 000 Total 73, 200 Phase II would double the size of Phase I proposal making a total network of 120 miles. This would occur over a number of years, and would use off-road trails wherever possible, incurring perhaps greater costs than Phase I. Phase III--Review the system and projected population growth to assess needs for further. expansion. 3. Supplementary suggestions a. Where necessary to use existing streets, bicycle trails shall be recommended on secondary roads, lower speed roads, and lower traffic flow roads wherever possible. On such streets a 4-foot bicycle lane for one-direction traffic shall be designated. b. When additional paving is necessary to make additional width for safe bicycling, this paving should be separated from the vehicle roadway by at least one foot wherever possible, giving a separated bike path. 6 . c. Where possible, bicycle trails should be developed at the time that other paving in the area is being done, to minimize labor and equipment costs. d. Utilize existing poles and posts for attaching bicycle route signs wherever possible. e. Develop separate bicycle trail the full length of the coastline on the beach side of the highway. This may be a roadway divided and marked for pedestrian and bikers' use. f. Establish separate bicycle. -paths to link established bicycle routes with the beach through the Bolsa Chica slough area, one path going perhaps along the bluffline. L Foot Paths 1. Foot paths have great value a. for walkers, hikers, joggers, cross-country runners b. for physical fitness, workouts, competition, recreation 2. Geographically, should be developed off the road in the vicinity of each high school, providing links with the larger community parks. Each of the larger parks should have available through the Recreation and Parks Department mapped foot courses of different lengths. (Murdy Park and . Mile Square courses are available. ) 3. Criteria for foot paths a. Should be separated from roadway and motor traffic wherever possible. b. Preferred surfaces are of grass, compacted dirt, or asphalt. Runners avoid concrete wherever they can. c . Should be marked with identification signs and markers for mileage every quarter-mile. d. Width of path should be 4 feet where possible. 4. Costs Grading and compaction 10 miles at less than $1000/mile $10, 000 Mileage and trail markers 60 miles 4 per mile, $20.00 each 4.800 14, 800 7 . C. Equestrian--Trails 1 . Values and needs a. Healthful outdoor companionship b. Simple pleasures derived by relationship between man and beast as Comraderie generated by membership in various clubs and groups d. Opportunity to retain back-country atmosphere in metropolitan dwelling e. Need to detour from street and sidewalk use 2. Geography a. Linkage of stable and equestrian areas with the Santa Ana River Trail and ultimately the state system b. Establishment of zoned areas permitting controlled stabling of animals c. Use of publi +��" ' *;�, f�ood control_and �riv_ ate dedicated rights of way for trail system 3. Criteria a. Off-road area wherever possible b. Eight to ten foot rail-fenced pathways c. Loose dird bed with eucalyptus and/or bean pod mulch to minimize dust d. Placards denoting use and direction e. Signs warning motorists of ;equestrian crossing f. Policing generated by equestrian clubs R. Maintenance by city personnel under control of Recreation and Parks department 4. Costs a. Initial construction of Phase I (12 miles) would require approximately $4000 per mile, or $50, 000 total. Land and Water Conservation grants are available upon approved- application. b. Yearly maintenance costs, estimated -at approxi- mately $12, 000, or $1, 000 per mile, could be offset by licensing of users--suggested $3.00 per individual and $5.00 per family. 8 . D. All Recreational Trails--History Much of the history and background of this project is summarized in the enclosures. This program has been sustained since October 1970 to the present by a group of interested citizens from the Environmental Council, Parks and Recreation Commission, Orange County Wheelmen, high school and college students, and staff from . .traffic engineering, police, public works, and administration. iepar.tments. It was this committee that organized the very successful Bicycle Day in May where 250 citizens rode the route we are proposing in Phase I . This committee has kept in close contact- with the county development of bicycle trails, and the routes proposed in neighboring cities. Shortly before the public meeting to discuss this proposal for a Recreational Trail System in Huntington Beach, on January 13, a large number of horse owners and riders became very interested in developing equestrian trails, and have worked very hard to make the progress they have. More than 150 individuals made their desires for a Recreational Trails System enthusiastically known at the meeting January 13. We believe that the citizens have gone as far as they can. It is now up to the City to act upon the recommendations that follow. We respectfully request your help in this venture. E. Costs Phase 1 1972-1973 Details described in sections A,B,C, above Bike Trails $73, 200 Foot Paths 14,800 Equestrian Trails 50.000 $ 13 , 000 Some potential sources of revenue are sugg@sted In the recommendations. Phase 11 1973-1978 Perhaps equivalent costs Phase III Maintenance might be best contracted during the first few years. Projected costs are available from the Engineering Department. 9 . M 'E M O R A .N D U M ' i' i TO : Recreation and Parks Commission FROM : Tom Severns , Development Coordinator { DATE : October 8, 1970 SUBJECT: TRAILS ELEMENT OF THE CITY .MASTER PLAN OF LAND USE The City Council at the regular meeting of October S , 1970, requested the Recreation and Parks Commission to develop the It criteria for a "Trails Element of the City Master Plan of Land Ilse . " The subject had been brought to the attention of Council by Norma Gibbs who has received requests for the development of "bikeway" throughout the city.. As you have probably noted , there is a growing movement among young people to turn to the bicycle for transportation to offset pollution this is particularly: true of college and high school age students who - are interested in direct partici-pa- �,: tion in the ecological/environmental movement . With the trail system to be designed into Huntington Central Park , the question arises as to provision of a total ci.ty- wide system to the beaches , to the parks , to the shopping centers , perhaps to connect to other systems such as the Newport Beach trail and the projected County and State trails . These are probably multi-use trails for the casual s hiker , jogger , bicycles (non-motor driven) , and perhaps horses . Concerning the above, the staff _ha.s developed outline critical for your review , comment and reaction. It is suggested that the outline be subjected to your analytical perusal and . returned at the first meeting of November to be rewritten by staff for development of the "Trails Element . " RECOMMENDATION Instruct staff" to provide in-depth criteria for a proposed trail system -- - same to be .transmitted to the Planning Commission in November 1970 . Tom Severns Development Coordinator TS:bwo t.., attach. Outline Criteria e o ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL J� City o Huntington Hunti ton Beach • P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Recreational Trails Committee , Environmental Council DATE : January 28 , 1972 RE : IMPLEMENTATION - PHASE I BICYCLE TRAIL There is a specific proposal for implementation that we would like you to consider- -to have your comments and hopefully action on before the County Planning Commission on this subject probably February 15 . Background The City of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach are developing a connecting link across the Santa Ana River, with a 10 foot wide two-way bicycle trail proposed from the Santa Ana River bridge to Seashore Drive on the south , and from the bridge a- long the outside of the State Beach fence to Brookhurst on the north . Recall that you have approved this trail in concept , and have approved the ordinance to walk bicycles across the bridge , as have Newport Beach and the County. The County Board of Supervisors has just approved the incorporation of a section of the Huntington Beach Bikeway, Phase I , into the County Master Plan, to link the. end of the Santa Ana River trail at Atlanta with the beach at Brookhurst . The Santa Ana River trail from Atlanta to Edinger is scheduled for develop- ment by the County before May 1972 . Ralph Leyva, Traffic Engineer, has prepared cost estimates for the implementation of the Huntington Beach Bikeway from the Santa Ana River toward Huntington Beach on Pacific Coast High- way, north on Brookhurst and Bushard to Atlanta, then east to the Santa Ana River trail . This is included here for your nformation. There are three alternatives proposed for the trail along the coast. Alternate I is recommended by the Recreational Trails Committee as being the most versatile . All three are approved by the local district and regional State Parks people . The State Division of Highways may have forwarded comment on these alternatives by the time of the meeting. The cost estimates for this project range from a minimum of $8700 which reflects materials but uses city forces for labor and equipment , to a maximum of $21 ,000 which would include all costs . Honorable Mayor and City Council January 28 , 1972 Page 2 Recommendations The Recreational Trails Committee recommends that Huntington Beach City Council : 1 . Approve this section of the Huntington Beach Bikeway as the first section of Phase I to be implemented, to `z be ready for summer 1972 use by bicyclists using the Santa Ana River trail , and ; 2 . Request partial or total funding of this project by the County which has $100 ,000 budgeted for bicycle i trail development before July. 1972 . Huntington Beach would probably assume maintenance costs thereafter. Respectfully submitted, RECREATIONAL TRAILS COMMITTEE ol 12 October 1972 ' TO: City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT : Bicycle Riding across Santa Ana River Bridge Inasmuch as it is a condition of the agreement with the State of California for the use of state parkland as. part of a bicycle trail that the city place a sign at the approach to the Santa Ana River bridge instruc- ting bicycle riders to walk their bicycles across such bridge , and inasmuch as the California Vehicle Code does not permit the city to enact any ordinance con- taining such prohibition, the State of California has agreed to accept a resolution. After conferring with the Public Works Department, we transmit the attached resolution which we feel will satisfy the terms of the agreement with .the state . Res ectf ly submitted, DON P . BONFA City Attorney /ahb j Attachment i i I I ITV OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION CA 72- 55 HUNTINGTON BEACH To Mayor and City Council From City Administrator. a!embers Subject EQUESTRIAN TRAILS AND Date September 27 , 1972 CROSSINGS e The following is a progress report of CA 72-48 (see \� attached) : 1 . Items 1 and 2 were completed September 15 , 1972 . 2 . Item 3 will be completed in conjunction with the realignment of Talbert Avenue . 3 . Item 4 - The Parks and Recreation Department is currently offering a course called "Basic Horse Science . " 4 . Item 5 - Robert Wohrman , Veterinarian , Public health Division , Orange County Health Department , is proposing legislation through channels in the County government . We are making every effort to coordinate with him and will keep the City Council members informed on the status of the pending Legislation . S . Item 6 - At this time we have received three, phone requests and one written request for use of property designated as equestrian centers on the "Trails Element Preliminary Plan" adopted by the Council in August . These are being reduced to firm proposals wherein the City would act as lessee on City properties or sponsor on the Utility or the Sanita- tion District properties . As the development of equestrian trails proceeds , I shall keep the City Council members advised. Respectfully , David D . Rowlands City Administrator DDR : eh J t �f R �� �ATY OF HUNTINCTO BEACH CA 7 2-4 8 ; � COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION NUNTINGTON SEA01 To Mayor and City Council From City Administrator Members Subject EQUESTRIAN CROSSINGS Date September 5 , 1972 Representatives of the Public Works Department and Police Department met with various representatives of the equestrian community to discuss horse-vehicle conflict , safety and equestrian crossing . As a result of this meeting, the following recommendations have been made: 1 . Establish an equestrian crossing at the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Garfield Avenue (this has 4-way control now, to be signalized very soon) . 2 . Install equestrian crossing and warning signs including signs instructing riders to dismount and walk their horses across the intersection. 3 . Establish an equestrian crossing at the intersection of. Goldenwest Street and Talbert: Avenue , realigned at such time as traffic signal is installed . 4 . Suggest that the Huntington Reach Parks and Recreation Department sponsor an equestrian riding club for recreational purposes and to promote an educational program on the care and use of animals and to promote safety practices . S . Support the County in establishing registration fees for horses and stables . Such fees to be used for : a . Trail maintenance b . Educational programs c . Animal control b. Establish a long range program of property exchange for the purpose of placing stables at the proper place at the proper time . Respectfully, 0419David D. Rowlan s City Administrator DDR :eh r HTV OF HUNTINGTONBEACH CA 72-48 COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Mayor and City Council From City Administrator Members Subject EQUESTRIAN CROSSINGS Date September 5 , 1972 Representatives of the Public Works Department and Police Department met with various representatives of the equestrian community to discuss horse-vehicle conflict, safety and equestrian crossing. As a result of this meeting, the following recommendations have been made: 1. Establish an equestrian crossing at the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Garfield Avenue (this- has 4-way control now, to be signalized very soon) . 2 . Install equestrian crossing and warning signs including signs instructing riders to dismount and walk their horses across the intersection. 3 . Establish an equestrian crossing at the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue , realigned at such time as traffic signal is installed. 4 . Suggest that the Huntington Beach Parks and Recreation Department sponsor an equestrian riding club for recreational purposes and to promote an educational program on the care and use of animals and to promote safety practices . S . Support the County in establishing registration fees for horses and stables . Such fees to be used for : a . Trail maintenance b . Educational programs c . Animal control 6 . Establish a long range program of property exchange for the purpose of placing stables at the proper place at the proper time . Respectfully, _----- Pf*'.0-e -_ David D. Rowlands City Administrator DDR: eh r� cZLRx s I q�-,p�/ ;r��SOLUTION 72-72 '( A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING THE RECOM- MENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE ORANGE COUNTY BICYCLE STUDY PREPARED BY THE ORANGE_ COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL DATED MARCH 1972 WHEREAS , the incidence of the theft of bicycles is rapidly increasing in Orange County as well as in the State of California, and legislation has been introduced in the form of Senate Bill 147 in order to deal with this problem; and WHEREAS , the Orange County Criminal Justice Council has pre- pared a detailed study on this matter dated March 1972 and entitled "Orange County Bicycle Study" which proposes an "Alternative to Senate Bill 147" ; and WHEREAS , the changes to Senate Bill 147 proposed in said ."Alternative to Senate Bill 147" have been proposed by representa- tives of law enforcement agencies who deal with the problem of bicycle theft, and said changes provide for the requirements of methods of licensing, licensing revenues , requirements of retailers to serialize bicycles and establishment of an automated file of all licensed bicycles in the State; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the City Council approves the recommendations contained in the Orange County bicycle study and does hereby urge the support of the modifications to Senate Bill 147 as suggested by the Orange County Criminal Justice Council in its study dated March 1972. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the City Clerk is hereby directed to forward a copy of this resolution to all local repre- sentatives and all members of the Committee on Transportation. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana at its regular meeting held on the 3rd day of July, 1972. ATTEST: MAYOR CLERK OF THE COUNCIL STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF SANTA ANA ) I , FLORENCE I . MALONE, do hereby certify that I am the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana; that the foregoing Resolu- tion was regularly introduced to said Council at its regular meet- ing held on the 3rd day of July, 1972 and was at said meeting passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES , COUNCILMEN: Herrin,Evans,Markel,Patterson,Villa, Yamamoto,Griset NOES , COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT , COUNCILMEN: None CLERK OF THE COUNCIL A ROVED JANIES A. WITHERS, TT RNENI THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT IS A FULL, TRUE, AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE. ATTEST:...................................... ............19.. FLORENCE I. MIALON'E, CLERK Oe iiE�C�ONL, Ci.'!Y OF SANTA AN.A_ .............. ....... .................. BY........... ..... DEPUTY ` V 19 January 1972 TO: City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance Prohibiting Bicycle Riding across Santa Ana River Bridge At the request of the Public Works Department and direction of the City Council, we transmit ordinance prohibiting the riding of bicycles across any portion of the Santa Ana River bridge . Respectfully submitted, DON P . BONFA City Attorney /ahb Attachment 30 May - 1972 TO : City Council FROM: City -Attorney . SUBJECT : - Ordinance Adding Section 7514 to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code Pertaining to Bicycles At the request of the Director - of. Harbors , Beaches, and . Development , this office has prepared and transmits to Council an. addition to ' the ~Huntington Beach Ordinance ' Code Section 7514 pertaining to ,bi.cycles . This section pro- hibits -the parking of bicycles on certain areas of the beach, provides for - impoundment of bicycles so parked and for the sale ' of- such bicycles which remain unclaimed. Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney DPB : lm Attachment G June 7 , 1972 TO : City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT : Recreational Trails - Phase I Project At the request of the City Administrator, the attached resolution is transmitted for adoption approving the application for land and water conservation funds for the Recreational Trails Phase I project . Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney /er Attachment 2 . F ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL City of Huntington Beach ' � P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 926 June 19 , 197.2 Honorable Mayor & City Council Members : The Environmental Council has reviewed the Trails Element Preliminary Plan as discussed at the Planning Commission public hearing June 6th, and wishes to be on record recommending that the- Trails Element be adopted as part of the Conservation and .Open Space Element of the Huntington Beach General Plan. d Margaret Carlbergj'� Chairman DISTRICT OFFICE - COMMITTEES j 9100 GARDEN GROVE BLVD. EDUCATION GARDEN GROVE,CALIF. 92641 A TEL.:AREA CODE 714 EFFICIENCY AND COST CONTROL 638.7401 ELECTIONS RAND TI REAPPORTI APPORTIONMENT SACRA MENTO ADDRESS STATE CAPITOL REVENUE AND TAXATION 95814 TEL.;AREA CODE 916 445.7446 q� KENNETH CORY ASSEMBLYMAN, SIXTY-NINTH DISTRICT DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS CHAIRM" E9 1 June 15 , 1972 \ l}' Paul C. Jones , City Clerk Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 �( Dear Mr. Jones : Thank you for your letter of June 8 and the copy of the action of your City Council with respect to Senate Bill 147. I have not yet had an opportunity to study the Orange County Criminal Justice Orange County Bicycle Study. However, I concur that something must be done to alleviate the growing problem of bicycle thefts, and I will support measures which will effectively achieve that purpose. I am enclosing a copy of SB 147 as amended May 30. In that form, the bill passed out of the Senate Committee on Transportation and is now awaiting hearing by the Senate Finance Committee. I appreciate having your views . Sincerely, i KENNETH CORY KC:Hb Enclosure 101 BIKECOLOGY WEEK MAY 1972 Huntington Bea( California, U. S.A. Mon. May 1 Bicycle Rally, and Report on Recreational Trails Come ride with others interested in Bicycle Trails in Huntington Beach. Congregate at Lake Park at 6Pm, ride around downtown Huntington Beach with the group, and meet at the City Council Chambers for the 7100 p.m. meeting. At the Council meeting there will be the Proclamation for Huntington Beach Bikecology Week, coinciding with California and U.S.A proclamations. After a brief announcement of the bicycle activities . proposed for the week, there will be a progress report from staff of the Recreational Trails plans. Tues. . May 20 Ride your bicycle to school, work, or play. Encourage your neighbors to do so also. Encourage employers to allow extra time for freshening up, and to set aside parkinF space just for bicycles. Reduce automotive pollution this week. Start on an active program for exercising by bicycle to improve your health--and at the same time get a closer view of your community. Wed. Mav 3. Moonlight Ride. 9 P•m• Finish your work early, and enjoy the fresh evening air along the ocean, with a full moon as well. Meet at the Harbors and Beaches office area at Lake Street and Pacific Coast Highway. Free auto parking will be provided just north of the Harbors and Beaches building for anyone bringing bicycles by car. Ride will proceed to the far end of Huntington State Beach for a rap session around a warm fire, then baek again to Lake Street. Thur. May 4. Take a Picnic and Bicycle with a Friend to your Neighborhood Park for Lunch. Enjoy watching the children play in the open space, especially in the parks which have recently installed new equipment. Talk about ways to increase bicycle use, and then communicate your ideas to the Recreation and Parks Department. Fri . May 5. Stress Bicycle Safety Encourage all teachers and youth groups to spend some time with children reemphasizing bicycle maintenance and safety. Look for newspaper reports or articles regarding safe bicycling in our city. Obtain and use safety publications. Sat. May 6. Bicycle Gymkhana Test your skills. on a course conducted by Orange County Wheelmen at the Edinger parking lot of Golden. West Co-llege. Compare your ability with a friend in maneuvering a series of obstacles and operations on your bicycle. The course will be open from 9 a.m. until 2 p.m. Sun_. May Ride the Proposed Huntington Beach Bicycle Ways, Between 10 and 2 start at the City Hall Parking Lot, 5th and Main. Obtain a map, hear about Recreational Trails progress, and sign a comment sheet if you wish. Any donations will be used for early development of the Bikeways. S =� ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL City of Huntington Beach • P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 • TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Recreational Trails Committee DATE : January 31 , 1972 SUBJECT : PROPOSAL FOR RECREATIONAL TRAILS IN HUNTINGTON BEACH (Summary) Hi s��tory itL� izens ' committees have met monthly since April 1971 to develop a proposal for recreational trails . One committee organized the very successful Bicylce Day in May , and held the public meeting on January 13 , 1972 which was attended by more than 150 interested people . Goals for each 50 ,000 residents for today ' s 130 ,000 residents Bike trails . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 miles Bike trails . . . . . . . . . 60 mi . Footh paths . . . . . . . . . . 25 miles Foot paths . . . . . . . . . . 60 mi . Equestrian paths . . . . . . . 5 miles Equestrian paths . . . . 12 mi . Objectives and Implementation 1 . All plans shall coordinate with county plans , and plans of neighboring cities . 2 . Bike trails will link major educational centers , parks , civic center , and recreational areas , especially beach , 3• Foot paths should provide a variety of terrain , and be connected . to high schools and college , with considerable use of larger park sites . 4 . Equestrian trails should link stable areas in Huntington Beach with the county trail system along the Santa Ana River , using off- street easements where possible . 5 . Two or three phases of development are proposed . Costs estimate for Phase I implementation 60 . miles of b ke trails . . . . . . . . $73 ,000 60 miles of foot p.aths . . . . . . . . . . 15 ,000 12 miles of equestrian paths . . . . 50 000 Total $138 0 Recommendations 1 . Adopt phi osophy and goals of recreational trails as proposed. 2 . Support the concept that the Recreational Trails System be recognized as a high priority item in city planning . 3. Appropriate $138,000 in the 1972-73 budget for implementation of the initial phase of the Recreational Trails System . 4. Adopt the basic principles , and any necessary zoning , for each type of trail . I/ PWPOSAL FOR RECREATIONAL TRAILS IN HUNTINGTON BEACH (Summary) Cont ' d . - 5 . Consider plans for recreational traisl in the development or redevelopment of parks , flood control channels , freeways , high- ways subdivisions and beach front . 6 . Appoint a Recreational Trails Committee , including representatives of each of the three special interest groups , and appropriate city commissioners and staff, to develop detailed three-phase master plans , including all costs . 2 . PROPOSAL FOR RECREATIONAL TRAILS IN HUNTINGTON BEACH Recommendations to the City Council of Huntington Beach 1 . A . Adopt the philosophy for Recreational Trails as outlined in this report . B . Adopt the goals as outlined in this report . That is , for each 50 ,000 residents there should be : 25 miles of bicylce trails 25 miles of foot paths 5 miles of equestrian trails 2 . Support the concept that the Recreational Trails System be recognized as a high priority item in City planning . 3 . A . Appropriate . $138 ,000 in the 1972-13 budget for implementation of the initial phases of the Recreational Trails System . B . Contact county , state and federal agencies and elected officials and discuss our concept , to solicit moneys for its implementation . We believe that this total concept is the first in the United States , and thus financial help may be forthcoming . C . Consider recent ligislation (SB 1100) that says construction of bicycle lanes and paths are a highway purpose under Article 26 of the Constitution , and thus are eligible for gas tax expenditures . D . Use land and income from the park and recreation dedication or fees required by subdividers to help finance land acquisition as appropriate for recreational trails . E . Direct the City Attorney to explore legality of imposing tax on bicylces and bicycle parts sold within the city ; revenue to be used to implement bicycle trails . 4 . A . Adopt in general the master plan outlined here for bicycle trails , subject to revision by the committee described below . Incorporate this into the City General Plan . B . Adopt the principle that foot paths should connect the Central City Park with as many schools and parks as possible . C . Support the concept that the stable area be connected to the county equestrian trail system along the Santa Ana River by means of Edison easements and flood control channels , or other off-road paths . D. Recommend zoning to allow equestrian trails to be functional . For example , appropriate zoning for a stable area , and quartering of horses in residential areas should be adopted . 3 . r PROPOSAL FOR RECREATIONAL TRAILS IN HUNTINGTON BEACH Recommendations to the City Council of Huntington Beach ( Cont ' d . ) 5 . A. Consider plans for recreational trails in all phases of Central City Park . B . Consider development of recreational trails , especially hiking and jogging , along the bluffline in Huntington Beach wherever possible--such as Bolsa Chica area , and between Adams and Yorktown . C. Consider development of recreational trails wherever there is building of new flood control channels , or with the rehabilitation of existing channels . D. Recognize that freeway and highway development and redevelopment must consider all existing or approved recreational trails , and provide safe transportation for bicycles and other non-motorized traffic. E . Consider recent legislation (AB 265) which states that sub- dividers of more than 200 home tracts may be required to provide separate bicycle paths within the tract development . We recommend that this be mandatory . 6 . A. Appoint a Recreational Trails Committee to develop a detailed three-phase master plan , including costs , which conform to the outline above . It is hoped that the plan would be submitted to the City Council prior to July 1 , 1972 . It is further hoped that Phase I be started prior : to January 1 , 1973 . B . For planning , implementation , and community input , it is suggested that a six-member Committee be appointed that would consist of: One person each from citizens representing bicycle riders, walkers and runners , and equestrians One city staff member each from' the Recreation and Parks Department , Planning Department , and Public Works .Department . C . It is further suggested that the staff work be assigned to , and carried out by , the Recreation and Parks Department , with support from other departments where appropriate . 4. PROPOSAL OF THE COMMITTEE TO IMPLEMENT RECREATIONAL TRAILS IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Philosophy` We believe that a Recreational Trail System in the City of Huntington Beach will enhance the quality of life of its citizens for years to come. A. The system will provide for widely accepted and widely practiced recreational activities such as bicycle riding, hiking and jogging, and horseback riding. B. The system will provide a means of transportation which Is independent of the internal combustion engine. Thus, it will reduce the production of noxious pollutants which endanger health. C. The system will not only tie together business locations, but it will tie together our park and beach systems, thus enhancing what is already one of the finest recreational programs in the county. D. The system will provide cohesion and identity for Huntington Beach. We feel this is particularly important in this age of urban sprawl where cities like ours virtually "disappear" into the megalopolis. Needs There is an increasing need for recreational trails in Huntington Beach. Presently there are no established approved marked trails for bicycles, foot travel, or horses in our city. Many paths are used by tradition for certain purposes, but are not designated on any map as legitimate trails, nor are they perhaps the best trails. Of the 400 replies to the May 1971 Sands coupon, more than 50 per cent indicated high priority need for bicycle trails in Hunting- ton Beach. There was also good positive support of the Bicycle Day (250 people) and the Recreational Trails meeting in January (over 150 people) . There are an estimated 80, 000 bicycle owners in Huntington Beach now--20,000 to 26,000 of which purchased their vehicles in Hunting- ton Beach in 1971 (bike sales are big business now--) Over 1500 high school and college students ride bicycles to school each day, and probably many more than that to elementary school--this of course being a an portation use instead of a recreation use. Huntington Beach ranks high in the quality and number of distance runners and cross-country athletes in Southern California. More than 200 7-14 year olds participate in the Recreation and Parks track program, and many more in their local schools. More than 150 boys In high school are in competitive cross-country track work, bringing many honors to our city. The cross-country and physical fitness programs at Golden West College involve about 90 people a year. The number of horses in Huntington Beach has more than doubled since January 1971. There are presently more than 700 horses, and over 2000 riders living in Huntington Beach. We must respect the needs and rights of this fast-growing group of people and develop trails for their use. 5 . Goals We strongly support the memoranda of October 8, 1970 and November 12, 1970, by Mr. Tom Severns, Development Coordinator of Huntington Beach which include the following standard for each 50, 000 residents : Bicycle Trails 25 miles Foot Paths 25 miles Equestrian Trails 5 miles For today•s city of 130, 000, this translates into Bicycle Trails 60 miles Foot Paths 60 miles Equestrian 12 miles For Huntington Beach at saturation with 250, 000 residents we should logically haver Bicycle Trails 125 miles Foot Paths 125 miles Equestrian Trails 25 miles Oblectiyes and Their Implementation - A. Bicycles 1. The attached map shows the plan as it would apply to bicycles. This plan is coterminous with that proposed by the county, and does make connecting links with our neighboring communities. 2. Development--Phase I- 60 miles Identification and warning signs $15, 000 Street marking--disks, lines etc. 8, 200 10 miles of 2-inch thick, 4-foot wide paving required 50, 000 Total ?3, 200 Phase II would double the size of Phase I proposal making a total network of 120 miles. This would occur over a number of years, and would use off-road trails wherever possible, incurring perhaps greater costs than Phase I. Phase III--Review the system and projected population growth to assess needs for further expansion. 3. Supplementary suggestions a. Where necessary to use existing streets, bicycle trails shall be recommended on secondary roads, lower speed roads, and lower traffic flow roads wherever possible. On such streets a 4-foot bicycle lane for one-direction traffic shall be designated. b. When additional paving is necessary to make additional width for safe bicycling, this paving should be separated from the vehicle roadway by at least one foot wherever possible, giving a separated bike path. 6 . i c. Where possible, bicycle trails should be developed at the time that other paving in the area is being done, to minimize labor and equipment costs. d. Utilize existing poles and posts for attaching bicycle route signs wherever possible. e. Develop separate bicycle trail the full length of the coastline on the beach side of the highway. This may be a roadway divided and marked for pedestrian and bikers' use. f. Establish separate bicycle paths to link established bicycle routes with the beach through the Bolsa Chica slough area, one path going perhaps along the bluffline. y B. Foot Paths 1. Foot paths have great value ae for walkers, hikers, joggers, cross-country runners b. for physical fitness, workouts, competition, recreation 2. Geographically, should be developed off the road in the vicinity of each high school, providing links with the larger community parks. Each of the larger parks should have available through the Recreation and Parks Department mapped foot courses of different lengths. (Murdy Park and Mile Square courses are available. ) 3. Criteria for foot paths a. Should be separated from roadway and motor traffic wherever possible. b. Preferred surfaces are of grass, compacted dirt, or asphalt. Runners avoid concrete wherever they can. c . Should be marked with identification signs and markers for mileage every quarter-mile. d. Width of path should be 4 feet where possible. 4. Costs Grading and compaction 10 miles at less than $1000/mile $10, 000 Mileage and trail markers ' 60 miles 4 per mile, $20.00 each 4.800 14,800 7 . 5 C. Equestrian Trails 1. Values and needs a. Healthful outdoor companionship b. Simple pleasures derived by relationship between man and beast c. Comraderie generated by lembership in various clubs and groups d. Opportunity to retain back-country atmosphere in metropolitan dwelling e. Need to detour from street and sidewalk use 2. Geography a. Linkage of stable and equestrian areas with the Santa Ana River Trail and ultimately the state system b. Establishment of zoned areas permitting controlled stabling of animals c. Use of public utility, flood control and private dedicated rights of way for trail system 3. Criteria a. Off-road area wherever possible b. Eight to ten foot rail-fenced pathways c. Loose dird bed with eucalyptus and/or bean pod mulch to minimize dust d. Placards denoting use and direction e. Signs warning motorists of ;equestrian crossing f. Policing generated by equestrian clubs g. Maintenance by city personnel under control of Recreation and Parks department 4. Costs a. Initial construction of Phase I (12 miles) would require approximately $4000 per mile, or 450, 000 total. Land and Water Conservation grants are available upon approved application. b. Yearly maintenance costs, estimated at approxi- mately $12, 000, or $1, 000 per mile, could be offset by licensing of users--suggested $3.00 per Individual and $5.00 per family. 8 . D. All Recreational Train,--History Much of the history and background of this project is summarized in the enclosures. This program has been sustained since October 1970 to the present by a group of interested citizens from the Environmental Council, Parks and Recreation Commission, Orange County Wheelmen, high school and college students, and staff from . traffic engineering, police, public works, and administration iepartments. _ It was this committee that organized the very successful Bicycle Day in May where 250 citizens rode the route we are proposing in Phase I . This committee has kept in close contact with the county development of bicycle trails, and the routes proposed in neighboring cities. Shortly before the public meeting to discuss this proposal for a Recreational Trail System in Huntington Beach,' on January 13, a large number of horse owners and riders became very interested in developing equestrian trails, and have worked very hard to make the progress they have. More than 150 individuals made their desires for a Recreational Trails System enthusiastically known at the meeting January 13. We believe that the citizens have gone as far as they can. It is now up to the City to act upon the recommendations that follow. We respectfully request your help in this venture. E. Costs Phase I 1972-1973 Details described in sections A,B, C, above Bike Trails 473, 200 Foot Paths 14,800 Equestrian Trails 50. 000 Some potential sources of revenue are suggdsted In the recommendations. Phase II 1973-1978 Perhaps equivalent costs Phase III Maintenance might be best contracted during the first few years. Projected costs are available from the Engineering Department. 9 . AMENDMENTS - MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL P�.N COMY19dl CWNOL - s STREETS AND HIGHWAYS LEGEND: FREEWAY Q MAJOR 120'R/W s PRIMARY 100'R/W NOTE SECONDARY 80'R/W I I' __M...� SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY NOT NECESSARILY ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY \� DASHED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE NO RIGHT OF WAY EXISTS i ill 11 �SYMBOL DENOTES PRIMARY COUPLET \\ % �Cl\ i CERTIFICATIONS: PLANNING COMMISSION I IT CITY COUNCIL 1, fl ;t r- CD CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ` -��- ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA jl ... , 11..[[r PHASE I 1472-73 PHASE II 197? •78 COU NTY - to be complete May 1972 S TEXENT OF THE ACTION OF CITY COUNCIL Council Chamber, City Hall Huntington Beach, California 1970 Mayor Shipley--called the regular__ ____ _meet-ing of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 4: 30 o 'clock P.M. Councilmen Present : Gib ; McCracken• x�, Matney, Coen, Shipley Councilmen Absent : _$�tlett Bicycle Riding Signs In response to a recommendation by Councilwoman Gibbs that steps be taken to install bicycle riding route signs on City highways , the Development Coordinator informed Council that the Recreation and Parks Department plans to request the Planning Commission to study the possibility of a trails system connection with Newport Beach and Sunset Beach, for bike riding, hiking and horseback riding . Following discussion, on motion by Coen, Council directed the Recreation and Parks Commission to develop the criteria for a Trail Element for the City 's Master Plan of Land Use . Motion carried . On motion by _ j.Xxxzl the regular meeting of the City Cou.rv%il of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned. Motion carried . Paul C . Jones City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach California ATTEST By Ernestina DiFatio Donald D . Shipley stant paid ,ram TQnp Mayor City Clerk By Ernestina DiFabio STATE OF CALIFORNIAss stant G ty Clerk County of Orange ) as : City of Huntington Beach ) I , PAUL C. JONES , the duly elected, qualified and acting City ;lerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Act.-. .'.on of the City Council !)f said City at their regular - meeting held on the 5th day of October 19 70 WITNESS my hand and ;eal of the said City of Hurtington Beach this the 7th day of October 19 70 Paul ( . Jones City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington 3each, Calif orr is Deputy M E M O R A N D U M TO : Recreation and Parks Commission FROM: Tom Severns , Development Coordinator DATE: October 8 , 1970 SUBJECT: TRAILS ELEMENT OF THE CITY MASTER PLAN OF LAND USE The City Council at the regular meeting of October 5 , 1970 , t requested the Recreation and Parks Commission to develop the criteria for a "Trails Element of the City Master Plan of Land Use . " The subject had been brought to the attention of Council by Norma Gibbs who has received request.- for the development of "hikewX s" throughout the city. As you have probably noted, there is a growing movement among young people to turn to the bicycle for transportation to offset } pollution this is particularly true of college and high school age studeixts who are interested in direct partici_pa tion in the ecological/environmental movement . With the trail system to be designed into Huntington Central Park, the question arises as to provision of a total city- wide system to the beaches , to the parks , to the shopping centers , perhaps to connect to other systems such as the Newport Beach trail and the projected County and State trails . These are probably multi-use trails for the casual. hiker, jogger, bicycles {nonotor driven) , and perhaps l horses . Concerning the above, the staff has developed outline critical for your review , comment and reaction . It is suggested that the outline be subjected to your analytical perusal and returned at the first meeting of November to be rewritten by staff for development of the "Trails Element . " RECOMMENDATION f 4` Instruct staff to provide in-depth criteria for a proposed trail system - same to be .transmitted to the Planning Commission in November 1970 . Tom Severns Development Coordinator TS .bwo attach . Outline Criteria ` OUTLINE TRAILS CRITERIA h' INTRODUCTION y Generally, the most urgent need for trails is in urbanized areas . The national standard suggests that for each 50000 resident }_local governments should plan 25 miles of foot trams'i , 5 miles of brjshe paths , and 25 miles s . The important pointto-be made here due to scarcity of land is that most trails can serve two or more uses . Please note also that Federal financial and_technical assistance is available in the existing programs of theDepartment of tFie Interior, the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. i Enumerated below are the general standards and criteria for each of the three trail categories - I .- Foot Trails Trails should be planned with numerous designated access points and interconnecting links . They should be well-defined, of various materials (asphalt or crushed brick, etc . ) ,., M' aintained tread, up to 10 feet in width, grades not to exceed 5 per cent average with a minimum of 15 per cent . It is recommended that any focal point for the system, such as Central Park, provide minimum parking for 25 autos . A nature trail should provide space for 50 people per mile of trail . Using a turnover rate of 8 , there are 400 people per mile of trail per day. This type of trail is typical of those that could be constructed for the coastline on an all-year round use basis . 2 . Bridle Paths If the City is to continue thinking in terms of horse trails , it would be wise to provide an equestrian center complete with riding ring, parking for vehicles and stock trailers with loading ramp or platform; holding stalls , hitching racks . and water . Suggested sites- within the city limits are Central Park or `.on County Sanitation District property at the mouth of the Santa Ana River. These could be focal points for access to the trail system. Trails should be well-graded with interconnecting leader trails and numerous access points ; grades should average 5 per cent , may be greater for short intervals , but should not exceed 15 percent; minimum parking for 10 to 80 vehicles and stock trailers depending on amount of use . /2 3. Bicycle Trails (Bikeways) The sport of cycling has reached an all-time high in popularity with more than 57 ,000,000 children and adults riding. The values of cycling fall into three broad classifications : utilitarian, :L recreational , physical fitness and today the. fourth, ecology and/or environment . As detailed in the attached article furnished by Norma Gibbs, the intown "bikeway is simply a carefully selected series of residential streets linking schools , parks , playgrounds , i shopping centers and other community facilities . " The City in considering bicycle facilities should delineate trails from bikewaZs . The latter is telatively ine_,pensive, is pickeiT" or sa ety� and is signed-or marked to alert tie motorist. Bicycle paths or trails , on the other hand, is a system of paths , separated from automotive traffic , trail markers , pathside rests with water and sanitary facilities . The path should be a minimum of 10 feet in width, have protected crossings, and surfacing suitable for ease of maintenance. CONCLUSION: The forgotten outdoorsmen of today are those who like to walk, hike, ride horseback, or bicycle . For them, we should provide trails as well as highways . Nor should motor vehicles be permitted to tyrannize the more leisurely human traffic. This latter thought is the crux of the problem - this is one way- to offset the noise and air pollution problem as it exists today . MEMORANDUM i TO: Recreation and Parks Commission FROM: Tom Severns , Development Coordinator DATE : November 12 , 1970 f . 'SUBJI;CT : Trails Element of the City Master Plan of Land Use The attached .criteria was prepared as per your instructions i.. of October 8th and Council request of October 5th . We have identified, in further detail , what could probably be considered the first phase of a trail system . This basic data should be evaluated by the Planning Department Staff and reviewed as to validity with the two major resource publica- tions of the U . S . Department of the Interior and the Bicycle Institute of America , Inc . This will require in-depth evaluation of city street routes , rights -of-way , and easements to determine the proper north/south and east/west routes to focal points of the system . The. Planning Staff- , incidently , has requested information .from the City of Fremont in the Bay Area . This city probably has the most outstanding plan in the state Recommendation: Transmit the criteria to the Planning Commission for creation of the Trails Element, and insiruct . the Recreation and Parks . Department staff to extend full assistance to -the Planning Department when requested as to advice . i I - Tom Severns Development. Coordinator .r TS/gbs Attachments .. 'rRAILS CRITERIA TRAILS ELEMENT OF MASTER PLAN OF LAN1► USE I NTR0DUC'T10N Assuming that there is a most urgent need for trails in tho _ :ipidly urbanized areas of Huntington Beach, it is recommended that the national standard for each 50,000 residents be adopted as follows : 25 miles of bicycle trails 25 miles of foot trails 5 miles of bridle paths Due to economic factors such as right-of-way and the scarcity of ] ►nd, it is further recommended that in the earliest stages of implementation that the premise of compatibility of bicycling, hiking and jogging on the same path system be adopted. OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRAIL LOCATION To identify and develop the prospects , it is suggested that the first priority be the evaluation of open space linking the outstanding town centers , north to\south and east to west . The prime possibilities lie in the use of utility rights -of-way, railroad rights-of-way, and easements . The major opportunity exists along the ocean front , even if is should only be the area between high and low tides.. The -second major opportunity is existing side streets where a simple delineation of interesting routes and the restricting of heavy use by motor vehicles can tie the community parks , Goldenwest College , Central City Park, Civic Center Complex, the library system, schools , and the ocean front into one massive network . This can be expedited by traffic counts to determine the least used streets and the erection of an appropriate signing system . It is also suggested that a reduced speed limit be among the criteria evaluated . The following planning guide is suggested: .l . Determine needs , .interests , problems , ordinance requirements . A.. Through existing records , observations , interviews . B . Survey available facilities and ' potentia.l connection to trail system. C . Evaluate findings. or surveys . 2 . Motivate community action and interest , i . e .., schools . 3 . Utilize existing facilities . A. Evaluate a preliminary plan in light of a community survey of existing trails . B . Experiment with marking roads and streets as bikeways or trails . C . Experiment with using walks ,- hiking trails , rights -of - way labeled as - trails or bikeways . L -• rriils 'Element of Master Plan of Land Use Page Two U. Try out multiple use of trails . F L . Promote planned community participation . F . Evaluate 'use of facilities and additional deeds . SOURCES OF STUDY MATERIAL AND DATA 1 . "Trails for America" , Department of the Interior , Bureau of 'Outdoor Recreation. 2 . National. Recreation and Park Association 3 . "Bike Trails and Facilities , a Guide to Their Design, Construc.ti.on and Operation" , American Institute of Park Executives , Inc . 4 , Bicycle Institute of America, Inc . S . State Department of Recreation G1NERAL STANDARDS 1 . Foot Trails - These should be planned with numerous designated access points and interconnecting links . if constructed , they should be well -defined , of substantial 'material (asphalt , crushed brick) , maintained tread , up to 10 feet in width , grades not to exceed 5 percent average with a' minimum of 15 percent . It is recommended that any focal point for the system, such as a community park , provide minimum parking for 25 autos . A nature trail should provide 'space for 50 people per mile of trail is typical of those that could be constructed for the coastline . 2 . Bicycle Trails - Trails can and should be located so as to follow the contour to a great extent. If located on an ,arteriai street or road , a suggested minimum road width is 24 feet so that a 4 root .strip can be set aside for a bicycle lane and leave two 10 foot lanes for motor vehicles . . Th'e bicycle lane should be m,,arked with 'a bright paint stripe at least four feet from the outer edge of the pavement , approximately six inches in width . This will permit cyclists to ride single file along the roadway . All trails or bikeways should be marked with the Intervational T3icycling Symbol . Speed limits of moor .traffic should be reduced to 35 or 25 miles per hour . 3 . Bridle Paths - . If the City .should think in terms of permanent orrse trails , it would be wise to provide zoning for equestrian centers complete with riding ring , parking for vehicles and stock trailers with a loading ramp or platform, holding stalls , hitching rocks and water . Suggested sites within the city limits are the Central Park Phase III or on the County Sanitation. District property at the mouth of the Santa Ana River . These would serve as the focal points for access to the trail system. 1. Tr';rils I:. lcmcrit of Moe 11];1n of land Use fake, AlIruo Trails should be well -graded with interconnecting leader trails and numerous access points ; grades should average { 5 percent , may be greater for shorter intervals , but should not exceed 15 percent ; minimum parking for 10 vehicles and stock trailers depending on amount of use . =a r;,:- Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 February 24, 1971 Mrs. Margaret Carlberg Chairman, Environmental Council P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 Dear Mrs. Carlberg: The Planning Commission is in the process of establish- ing priorities for their 1971 work program. A trails element or study was considered and subsequently ex- eluded as a project for this year. This in no way reflects on the desirability of es- tablishing a trails element to our master plan. It simply means that the Planning Commission has other projects that they feel deserve their immediate atten- tion. Very truly yours, K. A. Reynolds, Planning Director cc: Planning Commission • jl L CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 7 2 1 s OAL COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON LEACH To Mayor and City Council From City Administrator Members ul" j11 Ct'r Y GO Subject ORANGE COUNTY BICYCLE STUDY Date lay 23 , 1972 may , RECOMMENDATIONS TO AMEND -��-� TSB 147 y�� r_t'LRK 9 Bicycles have been an increasing source of difficulty in both the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Orange County, as well as California. Legislation has been introduced at the State level which would direct attention to this problem. Senate Bill 147 is one of the Bills introduced. The Orange. County Bicycle Study , compiled by the Orange County Criminal Justice Council , suggests alternatives that should be incorporated in the Bill : Basically, the changes provide for the requirements and methods of licensing, licensing revenues , and requirements of retailers to serialize bicycles . It also proposes that the Department of Justice maintain records relative to stolen and lost bicycles . It is recommended that that the Huntington Beach City Council adopt the recommendations of the report to amend S .B . 147 by minute action and direct that the Council ' s minute action. be forwarded to each of the Orange County Legislators in Sacramento . Respectfully, avid D Rowlands Citv Administrator DDR:bwo �... attach . _ yam.'•_?:�1':.J.. __' �c .- .. f• 'C-.:F_ ��'-L-Li)"`i'V1.i't✓ _ n Article 5 . Licensing of Bicycles 21300 (a) No person shall operate a bicycle on any street , road , highway or other public property unless such bicycle is licensed in accordance with this article . 21300 (b) Licenses and registration forms shall be provided by the Department of Justice to each issuing agency at a fee sufficient to cover the cost of administering the depart- ment ' s responsibilities under this article , but in no event more than twenty-five (25) cents . 21301 . Each local authority shall provide for the licensing of bicycles pursuant to this article and the rules and regulations adopted thereunder . 21302 . Licenses shall be issued by the city or county in which the applicant resides . Cities and counties shall by ordinance or resolution set license fees , and regulations necessary to enforce this article . Such regulations may provide for the issuance of license by retailers . Every license shall expire at midnight on the thirty-first (31) day of December on every even numbered year commenc- ing December 31 , 1974 . Licenses shall be renewed every two years and upon change of ownership. They shall be valid anywhere in the State . Each licensing agency shall maintain for a period of no less than two (2) years records which shall include : license number ; name of licensee ; type of bicycle ; model . No license may be issued for any bicycle not in conformance with Section 21301 . 21303 . Funds derived from bicycle license fees shall be retained by the licensing city or county and used to implement and and improve bicycle registration and safety programs in its jurisdiction. 21304 . Each bicycle retailer shall supply to each purchaser , a registration form provided by the Department of Justice which shall include the following information : name of retailer ; address of retailer ; year and make of bicycle ; serial number of bicycle ; general description of bicycle ; name of purchaser ; address of purchaser . A copy of this document shall be forwarded to the appropriate licensing agency. 21305. No bicycle retailer shall sell any bicycle in this State unless such bicycle has permanently stamped or cast on its frame a serial number pursuant to the regulations adopted under this article. 21306. No bicycle , the wheels of which are less than twenty (20) inches in diameter and the frame size is less than fourteen (14) inches shall be subject to this article . 21307. The Department of Justice shall adopt regulations for the administration and implementation of this article . Such regulations shall be adopted after consultation with local authorities , bicycle manufacturers and retailers , and bicyclists ' organizations . 21308. Any peace officer may impound any bicycle subject to this article which is not in conformance with the provisions of this article . 21309. Any violation of this article shall be deemed an in- fraction as set forth in Section 40000 of this Code . SECTION 2 . Section 11110 is added to the Penal Code. 11110. The Department of Justice shall maintain records relative to stolen and lost bicycles in the Criminal Justice Information System. Such records shall be accessible to authorized law enforcement agencies through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System. SECTION 3 . There is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of Justice the sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100 , 000) , or so much thereof as may be necessary, to be expended for the purposes of this act . STATEMENT OF THE ACTION OF CITY COUNCIL Council Chamber, City Hall Huntington Beach, California Monday June 5, 1972 Mayor Coen called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:00 P.M. Councilmen Present; Bartlett, Gibbs, Matney, Duke, Coen Shipley - (arrived at 7::25 P.M.) - Green - (arrived at 10:30 P.M.) Councilmen Absent: None ORANGE COUNTY BICYCLE STUDY - RECOMMENDATIONS TO AMEND SB 147 - APPROVED The City Administrator presented a transmittal of alternatives to Senate Bill 147 suggested by the Orange County Criminal Justice Council in their Orange County Bicycle Study which would provide for the requirements and methods of licensing, licensing revenues, and requirements of retailers to serialize bicycles, together with the proposal that the Department of Justice maintain records relative to stolen and lost bicycles. He recommended that Council adopt the recommendations in the report to amend SB 147, and that the appropriate legislators be so notified. On motion by Matney, Council approved the recommendation of the City Administrator, adopted the recommended alternatives to amend SB 147 suggested by the Orange County Criminal Justice Council in their Orange County Bicycle Study, and directed that the appropriate Orange County Legislators be notified of this action. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Matney, Duke, Coen NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None 4cx�.c�'c:c9cx>ck�Y�c�'c�'c�c�c4c�ck�'c�cx4c�e�Y�Y:c�c�Y�Y�c�Y�'c�c�Y�Yx�c�c�cxx�Y�c�'e�ex�Y9c�ek�Y�Y�'c�Y�c�Y�c�'e��9c�Y�Y�cx:'c;Y On motion by Green the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned at 12:05 A.M. to June 12 at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Matney, Duke, Coen NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None Paul C_ Jones City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: Paul C. Jones Alvin M. Coen City Clerk Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Orange ) ss: City of Huntington Beach ) I, PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their regular meeting held on the 5th day of June 1972. WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this _th.e ` 6th day of .Tune 197. s. Paul_.Ci "Jones' City Cle-tk and ex-officio Clerk of the C-ity Council of the-Ci-ty of Huntington Beach, ,CCaa-lifornia If Deputy F.' June 8, 1972 The Honorable James E. Whetmore Senate Post Office State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95801 Dear Senator Whetmore: DThe City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting J held Monday, June 5, 1972, approved the recommendation of the f� City Administrator to adopt the recommended alternatives to amend Senate Bill 147 as suggested by the Orange County Crim- inal Justice Council in their Orange County Bicycle Study. We are enclosing a "Statement of Action of the City Council" and urge your support in implementing the amendments to the Bill. Sincerely, PAUL C. JONES City Clerk By Assistant City Clerk PCJ:ED:P Encl. June 8, 1972 The Honorable Dennis Carpenter Senate Post Office State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95801 Dear Senator Carpenter: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting Dheld Monday, June 5, 1972, approved the recommendation of the City Administrator to adopt the recommended alternatives to amend Senate Bill 147 as suggested by the Orange County Crim- inal Justice Council in their Orange County Bicycle Study. Lf We are enclosing a "Statement of Action of the City Councilor and urge your support in implementing the amendments to the Bill. Sincerely, PAUL C. JONES City Clerk By Assistant City Clerk PCJ:ED:p Encl. June 8, 1972 The Honorable Robert H. Burke Assembly Post Office State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95801 .Dear Assemblyman Burke: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, June 5, 1972, approved the recommendation of the D City Administrator to adopt the recommended alternatives to amend Senate Bill 147 as suggested by the Orange County Crim- inal Justice Council in their Orange County Bicycle Study, We are enclosing a "Statement of Action of the City Council" and urge your support in implementing the amendments to the Bill. Sincerely, PAUL C. JONES City Clerk By Assistant City Clerk PCJ:ED:p Encl. June 8, 1972 .The Honorable -Kenneth Cory Assembly Post Office State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95801 Dear Assemblyman Cory: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, June 5, 1972, approved the recommendation of the D City Administrator to adopt the recommended alternatives to amend Senate Bill 147 as suggested by,,— � the Orange County Crim- inal Justice Council in their Orange County Bicycle Study. !# We are enclosing a "Statement of Action of the City Council" and urge your support in implementing the amendments to the Bill. Sincerely, PAUL C. JONES City Clerk By Assistant City Clerk PCJ:ED:p Encl. June 8, 1972 Orange County Criminal Justice Council P. 0, Box 1405 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Gentlemen: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, June 5, 1972, approved the recommendation of the City Administrator to adopt the recommended alternatives to amend Senate'Bill 147 as suggested by the Orange County Crim- inal Justice Council in their Orange County Bicycle Study. We are enclosing a "Statement of Action of the City Council" for your information. We have sent letters to our local Assemblymen and Senators and the Orange County League ofCities, urging their support -in this matter. Sincerely,, PAUL C. JONES City Clerk By Assistant City Clerk PCJ:BA:P . Encl. i June 8, 1972 j Winston Updegraff, Executive Secretary Orange County League of Cities 282 Cajon Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Dear Sir: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, June 5, 1972, approved the recommendation of the D City Administrator to adopt the recommended alternatives to amend Senate Bill 147 as suggested by the Orange County Crim- inal Justice Council in their Orange County Bicycle Study. We are enclosing a "Statement of Action of the City Council" and urge the League's support in implementing the amendments to the Bill. We have sent letters to our local Assemblymen and Senators urging their support. Sincerely, PAUL C. JONES City Clerk l By: j Assistant City Clerk � PCJ:ED:p f Encl. i i i ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL Cityof Huntin�ton Beach • P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 TO:. Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Recreational Trails Committee , Environmental Council DATE : January 28, 1972 RE: IMPLEMENTATION - PHASE I BICYCLE TRAIL There is a specific proposal for implementation that we would like you to consider- -to have your comments and hopefully action on before the County Planning Commission on this subject probably February 15 . Background The City of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach are developing a connecting link across the Santa Ana River, with a . 10 foot wide two-way bicycle trail proposed from the Santa Ana River bridge to Seashore Drive on the south , and from the bridge a- long the outside of the State Beach fence to Brookhurst on the north . Recall that you have approved this trail in concept , and have approved the ordinance to walk bicycles across the bridge , as have Newport Beach and the County. The County Board of Supervisors has just approved the incorporation of a section of the Huntington Beach Bikeway , Phase I , into the County Master Plan, to link the end of the Santa Ana River trail at Atlanta with the beach at Brookhurst . The Santa Ana River trail from Atlanta to Edinger is scheduled for develop- ment by the County before May 1972 . Ralph Leyva, Traffic Engineer , has prepared cost estimates for the implementation of the Huntington Beach Bikeway from the Santa Ana River toward Huntington Beach on Pacific Coast High way, north on Brookhurst and Bushard to Atlanta, then east to . the Santa Ana River trail . This is included here for your information. There are three alternatives proposed for the trail along the coast. Alternate I is recommended by the Recreational Trails Committee as being the most versatile . All three are approved by the local district and regional State Parks people . The State Division of Highways may have forwarded comment on these alternatives by the time of the meeting . The cost estimates for this project range from a minimum of $8700 which reflects materials but uses city forces for labor and equipment , to a maximum of $21 ,000 which would include all costs . t _ Honorable Mayor and City Council January 28 , 1972 Page 2 Recommendations .The Recreational Trails Committee recommends that Huntington Beach City Council : 1 . Approve this section of the Huntington Beach Bikeway as the first section of Phase I to be implemented, to be ready for summer 1972 use by bicyclists using the Santa Ana River trail , and; 2 . Request partial or total funding of this project by the County which has $100 ,000 budgeted for bicycle trail development before July 1972 . Huntington Beach would probably assume maintenance costs thereafter. Respectfully submitted, RECREATIONAL TRAILS COMMITTEE OFFICE MEMORANCOM To Mrs. Margaret Carlberg, Chairman Date January 24, 1972 Environmental Council From Ralph R. Leyva, Traffic Engineering Division In Re Bicycle Trails - Phase I The following cost estimates are based on providing a bicycle trail parallel to Pacific .Coast Highway between the Santa Ana River and Brookhurst Street, using three alternates. Alternate I is to construct a 3" asphalt concrete bikeway, 10 feet wide on the outside of the State Beach fence. The second alternate would be to construct the same pathway inside the fence line. The third alternate would use a portion of the frontage road inside the fence and a portion outside to link with the bridge. ALTERNATE CONTRACT FORCE ACCOUNT 1 $8300.00 $4400.00 2 $8900.00 $4600.00 3 $3500.00 $1700.00 The estimates were based on construction being accomplished by contract or by City forces. The estimates under force account do not include labor. Extending the bikeway northerly from Pacific Coast Highway and Brookhurst Street would require the construction of 3730 lineal feet of 4' walkway as shown in red on attached maps. The cost is estimated to be $8300 by contract and $550& by force account. The cost may be less depending how soon the R-1 area is developed on the east side of Bushard Street north of Brookhurst Street. i The attached plans also show the location and type of signs which will be needed. The red crosshatched portion of the map shows { a residential area that will have to be posted "No-Parking". i Assuming that no parking signs will be needed only at the residential area and at the intersection of Brookhurst Street and i Atlanta Avenue, the total cost for signing -will be: Sign Quantity Unit Cost* Cost Bike Route 15 $20..57 $308.55 Bike Xing 19 20.57 390.83 No Parking 7 23.87 167.09 Lane Lines (If required) 2 miles 280.00 560.00 $1426.47 *Price includes labor, material and equipment. Without post, the cost would be $6.20 less. Memorandum January 24, 1972 Page 2 If it becomes necessary to post no parking signs along the rest of the bike route, the added cost would be $2,387.00 based on 50 signs per mile for both directions. Using maximum and minimum cost estimates, the summary of total cost is as follows: Location Maximum Cost Minimum Cost S/0 P.C.H. $ 99000 $1,700 N/O P.C.H. to O.C. Bikeway $12,000 $7,000 Total $21,000 $8,700 Mike Harris of the Orange County Planning Department contacted me on January 21, 1972 and stated that they would recommend to the Board of Supervisors that the County share in a portion of the costs for inclusion of the City's bikeway in the County's plan. alph Leyva Traffic Engineering Division RRL:f a Attach. PLANNING ZONING DM 20 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 18-6-10 NOTE CITY OF ADORTED 4RR 4, 19W CITY COUNCIL ORDIDI NANCE NO 160 ';ENE AMENDED ORO.N0. AMENDED ORD.NO. 2.19.62 8990 !_8 67 1301 783 97 e_ 1304 7-�7,1 ,i ex „ CNE ITw7 uPF—a—KT cr 2. . 9s 4-17-61 3i]HUNTINCTON BEACH 4.63 r7 992 0-2- 7 353 i_ 9-168 004 2-5-68 1399 r 3-16-64 1043 4-IS- 403 —vE - AT.DxA;10isxCT ORANGE /L \ L )'. CLIIFOK \IA 4.20-64 1048 6-17-68 =77811 s-.:664 1085 10.17-58 1448 mEKDEN([ AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: .7. i , 0-36-6899 9 [$) q,N.E. LINE 7-8-88 IIS2 WNEL.a10 D a4L D—T W.221.275.-.67,738•343.357,409.420.416.488.516,528,66.1,96.2.66-21,68-42,68-69 10-1e-86 1162 12-6-69 15432 cm— Di. 66-70 66-67.67.23,67J6.66.4.99-16.68-27.69-25.69-29,69-30.69_30,70-25.71-13,71-19, 4-4-68 1195 !-2_70 IS58 4-4.68 1197 -IB-71 1622 [ 6-. 68 1 8-16-71 166 K 43-3.86 1257 57 8-I6-7I 1663 •; J\1 ATLANTA 1 ®� y ® �EN�E RI , y RI RI RI RI W I RI y RI ;,RI RI RI ~ i 6 lJ RI R I Da $ CF—E s 3RI RI CF—E CF-R E,7iHDx.x Da 1ete60N.R�GN SGR00�.) RA-0 R I RI PLDlREE(m= — :YI[vY CNP6C" DR R2 "R( � •ids _=:air E>,;�" �;E fik�,- - = RI 's �� RI R2 R2: $ —F i , _ v9a aoyP: xJAuef:A'� 'ND1 lr� RI , :.� p4 N RI a Nay R2�1 - tN"uw W; xAae6n ibi,c m+ - O RI-RI g RI ° 2g� ... o RI RI x RI I— ��N R2•sR ;, $ 5 @ RI 6 y rr : —s C 2 , KFKRTK[ Dwv[ _____ __ [1[w S_vE PE_ Eq-._---__._D�- RA-0 RI RI RI ¢ RI R2 g HPM470N -- S AVE -- RI RI UR IRICRI RI RIR2 RI r 0881 CA, N4R1 DR. CRRI RI RI RI RIRI RlN'GUE' R. R I R I 1 R. I. 4[rnn ,.,F R I R I AxowL` EA I A CR. 1 `1 CR S g ., C x R 3 R3 R I R I < RI RI RI a3 al = RI RI r alb l�ll�J.1 RN E 14 J OR N D j 6 / 9 iilo' R I RI W I�1 x N. RI,w M N b YI CF_E R31 CF-R„: RI RI x a. e KAHULUI CF—E 5 ` R I WADER&CW.M.) RAMBLER 6 MANA D RI RI p RI RI 4U ND DR RI RI R I 3Py It ARAA Rl Da79NA aocf a _ y 2 R I A oNA 0a " RI wn,« E R A�O R I k RI CF-R 2 RI a RI 4.. BANNING AVE, n n � u w n[9 LEGEND A BIKE ROUTE SIGN BIKE CROSSING SIGN NO PARKING SIGN I I PLANNING ZPNING DM 22 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 19-6-10 ., NOTE r ADOPTED MARCH 7.1960 ` \11I I'Y OF CIT7 COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.754 LEGENDS- ,r '�• „' S""" AMENDED ORD_N0. AMENDED ORO.NO. HI�I TINGTON BEACH 6-7D.6D 774 26 l[1 �111---NCI 12.5.60 904 s-.3-61 000 LW •PEM1roEHc[usrn:c'. 9.5-65 1000 u co+ul•�nc re�a."cs��cxcc ors.nrt* 5-6-66 1055 ORANGE COUNTY, CALII''OHNIA 2-6-8 D-,-65 1161 1 1168 AMENDED BY ZONE CASE N0: 10-19-To I606 116, 15A,155,159.SAA,.16,52%529,W67,TO-10.11-1,71-I], 5-3-71 I6A] n cr„e1—•••ai 9-I6-71 I664 nAOR� RI 9 RI RI RI e01 RI RI RI 5 R11ses6 ° RI tl RI i RI RI r ' a1 LA JOLLA CA. I CR. I If 1 \ RI C RI ' -cR CR. RI ° RI 1 o C E1 ANI R S RI r'1 I a 1 1 . �, m , If R-5 R2 MI-A L-90 1 7. � 1 0 1. 4 y \ 0P T C R I R-5 Pl ' R 1 4�0/ CFq^, o °os c y� 6�.•4 C �S ti l o /\ 'o I 1/OOO�� i e ti /• OV 741O/�� �•- .r� i 1•-y1Z p�.- O= U `'D�'r 1_w MINUTE)* OF THE BOARD OF SL)PERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNI.A February 1, 1972 . IN RE: PROPOSE Id ,GOT1�TIONS W]TH Tila; VIS1TINC; hUi1SE ASSOCIATION OF ORANGE COUNTY On motion of Supervisor Clark, duly seconded .and unantnicjusly carried by Board menib.ers present, the County Administrative Officer is directed to meet with .the Health Officer and members of the Board of Supervisors, or their .representatives, on the proposed negotiation with ' the Vi.si.ting Nurse Association of Orange County for the purpose of developing a 'plan. f'or al.County-wide home health agency through the merger of the staff .of tic Visiting; Nurse Association and the Division of . t Pub l'i_c Iieal_th Nur:3:ing, of the Health Department, and is to present his recommendations on February.. 29, 1972. '} IN RE': INCORPORATING A PORTION OF. THE HUNTINGTON BI;ACII BIKE11AY PLAN, .r PHASE L, 1I1 TO 1'II E COU11��"Y IIID E B:CCYCLE' TRAIL SYSTElh1 -on• motion of Supervisor Clark, duly seconded and unanimously carried by Board rrie;nbers present, the request of the Huntington Beach. City. Council to consider incorporating the Huntington Beach Bikeway -Plan, Phase 1, into the countywide bicycle trail system is received and is referred. to the Orange County Planning Commission for consideration. as amendment number one to the Countywide Skeletal Bicycle Plan and the ..necesoary public hearings regarding said consideration, as recommended by the Chairman of Regional Parks Advisory Team in his letter dated January 24, 19'72. IN RE: INVESTIGATION TRASH AND 'LITTER IN ORANGE COUNTY EST ABLTI�?if,!EITT :nl;' A NIOBIJ_,E TRA.)H..PAi'ROL On motion of Supervisor Battin,. duly seconded and unanimously carried by Board members present, the County Administrative Office is directed to determine existing areas of . responsibility for cleaning up trash and litter in Orange County and report back to the Board of Supervisors i;ith recommendations for consideration of a Mobile Trash Patrol, either within or without any existing County department, to have overall responsibility for keeping Orange County free from visually offensive trash and litter. L 1013.2.2 - - yr-. � t � '+ r ___. {j. i_°i _r '- �_ ; � I• j _ _ r F c-w'f > t c r 'ti- z JI ca _ a 1t �. r L;�t �.. '��;��•l�� -� '�. j =, t l k t �y hf.- -g .t-.a. rt � -+ 4;_. 4. p�{_w }k •4-W�• ba _„�� �� ='t � �I�°f - t, ��, �}.t'�. r !`":t�S �= L ��s !,nAs-.� 1 ,.,. li .�ti` n'x� _1},, 'ri F�: n I�3�g��. _ tE���11fj.�� ��# •�r. �1 ilk City of Huntington beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT January 7, 1972 Go��GZti Honorable Mayor and City Council / /< City of Huntington Beach / t Attention: Brander Castle Acting City Administrator Subject: Proposed ordinance Regulating Bicycle Riding on Pacific Coast Highway at Santa Ana River Bridge Gentlemen: In response to letters from the city of Newport and the State Division of Highways (copies attached) to study a proposed ordinance regulating bicycle riding on Pacific Coast Highway, the following report is presented for review by your Honorable Body. The proposed ordinance (copy attached) is a result of a plan being developed by the traffic departments of Huntington Beach and Newport Beach and the Califor- nia Parks and Recreation Department. The plan is to provide off-highway bicycle trails on State property through Huntington Beach and on undeveloped land in Newport Beach between the Santa Ana River bridge and a proposed bicycle way through the city of Newport Beach (see attached map). The emphasis of this plan is safety, and the State's par- ticipation is'-dependent upon the County and City's action to provide a safe crossing over the Santa Ana River bridge. Allowing bicycles to merge with automobiles on the bridge would not be in the best interests of the agencies involved. In pursuing Item 3 of the State's letter, Mrs. Margaret Carlberg has con- tacted representatives of the State Department of Parks and Recreation. Their response has been favorable. In addition, this office has written the State Division of Highways regarding the feasibility of constructing a pathway along the outside of the State Beach fence (see attached plan) . A response to this request should be received within a few weeks. 1 Honorable Mayor and City Council January 7, 1972 Page 2 Completion of the plan will provide a continuous bicycle trail from the peninsula in Newport Beach to the entrance of the State Beach at Pacific Coast Highway and Brookhurst Street. Future continuation would connect that point with the southerly terminus of the County-Wide Bicycle System as described in Resolution No. 3396 passed recently by your Honorable Body. The proposed ordinance will eliminate the extremely hazardous situation of mixing bicycles and high-speed automobile traffic which presently exists along Pacific Coast Highway, particularly at the Santa Ana River bridge. Success of the City-County plan is dependent upon adoption of the proposed ordinance by the City. It is recommended that your Honorable Body adopt the proposed ordinance. Ver tni ly yours, James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:RRL:ae Attach. DRAFT '4 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADDING SECTION 7334 TO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE. The City Council of the city of Huntington Beach, California, does ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 7334 is hereby added to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code to read as follows: S. 7334 Dismounting of Bicycle is Required Every person riding a bicycle shall dismount before transporting his bicycle over the bridge across the Santa Ana River on the sidewalk along the southerly side of Pacific Coast Highway. Riding of bicycles across the bridge over the Santa Ana River along the northerly side of Pacific Coast Highway is prohibited. CITY OF COSTA MESA CALIFORNIA h _ � FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY aRoe`'� 1500 ADAMS. COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 Winston R. Updegraff, Executive Secretary Orange County Division League of California Cities 635-A Famona Avenue Laguna Beach, California 92651 Gentlemen: In anticipation of the Orange County Divisions interest in Bicycle matters and the legal aspects thereof, this office has done some preliminary work in the form of legal research, and in the form of a status report,. we present the following. Initially it was not clear to this office whether or not the State Legislature had pre-empted the field of regulation of bicycle riding to the exclusion of local agencies. This was brought about by language of Section 21200 of the Vehicle Code, which appears to make bicycle riding subject to the rules of the road, and thus, make this activity subject to Section 21663, Vehicle Code which prohibits the operation on public sidewalks. This question was submitted to Assemblyman Burke with the request that if Legislative Counsel concurred in this interpretation, Legislation be introduced to authorize local -agencies to legislate by Ordinance in this field. of activity. A copy of the letter to Assembly- man Burke, dated August 3 , 1971 is attached to this report. The office of the Legislative Counsel, by letter dated September 7 , 1971 came to the conclusion that these sections of the Vehicle Code were not applicable to bicycles. A copy of this opinion is attached to this report, and this office concurs in the findings of Mr. Wing, the Legislative Counsel, who drafted the opinion. i CITY OF COSTA MESA, CAL:.MA Winston R. Updegraff Page 2 November 29, 1971 It would appear from this and it is the opinion of this office, that local agencies may legislate by Ordinance, regulating the field of bicycle riding in any manner desired, not contrary to and consistent with Sections 21200 through and including 21207 of the Vehicle Code. This is further substantiated by the language of Section 21206 which says as follows : "Section 21206 Local Regulation This chapter does not prevent local authorties, by Ordinance, from regulating the operation, use, licensing , or equipment of bicycles, pro- vided such regulation is not in conflict with the provisions of this Code. " No model Ordinance has been drafted as of this time, and this office seriously questions whether or not one is necessary, in view of the varried needs of the cities of Orange County. The Ordinance authorized by Section 21207 , Vehicle Code relating to bicycle lanes upon highways other than State highways will be a matter of personal preference with each individual City, and an Ordinance which simply sets forth the streets involved and authorizes the appropriate markings, is of sufficiently simple nature that a model Ordinance is not required. Again, as with the mini-bikes, no attention has been paid to the bicycle trails which may be necessary as part of the Park and Recreation Program of any City, inasmuch as each City seems to have a uniquely different approach to this question. For informational purposes, there is attached to this report a copy of an Ordinance, recommended by the Police Department for the City of Costa Mesa and currently under study by a special committee appointed by the Mayor for this purpose. It has not yet been returned to the Council for consideration or adoption. + CITY OF COSTA MESA, CAU. Winston R. Updegraff Page 3 November 29, 1971 This will constitute a status report of the Committee of the Orange County Division, currently assigned the task of determining the legal aspects of both bicycle regulation and the motorscooter problem . Re ectfull bmitted, Roy J e,•-' City Att ey REJ:kml Enclosures cc: Robert F. Finnell, President Tom Woodruff All Councilman City Manager Chief of Police C % ` I 12 MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA December 28, 1971 TN RE-. CLAIM AGAINST THE LIVESTOCK INDEMNITY FUND HTTJ, On motion of Supervisor Clark, duly seconded and unanimously carried by Board members present, the Claim of Harold S. Hill against the Livestock Indemnity Fund in .the amount of $20.00 for one Shropshire Ewe killed by a dog or dogs, is approved as recommended by the Orange County Health Officer and the County Auditor-Controller is instructed to issue his warrant in the amount of $20.00 to Harold S. Hill, 20132 E. Chapman Avenue, Orange, California 92669. IN RE: CLAIM AGAINST THE LIVESTOCK INDEMNITY FUND SLIGAR On motion of Supervisor Clark, duly seconded and unanimously carried by Doard .members .present, the Claim of Richard Sligar against the Livestock Indemnity Fund in tbo. amount of $22..00 for eleven white Leghorn Chickens gilled by a dog or dogs, is approved as recommended by the Orange County Health Officer and the County Auditor-Controller is instructed to issue his warrant in the amount of $22.00 to Richard Sligar, 10881 Meads Avenue, Orange, California 92669. `Z! IN RE: PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION HUNTINGTON BEACH BIKEWAY PLAN, PHASE I On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and unanimously carried by Board members present, Resolution No. 3396 dated December 6, 1971, of the City Council of the: City of Huntington Beach, urging the j County to:'consider incorporating the Huntington Beach Bikeway Plan, f - - , - county-7-i,. do bl^lrcl e trai 1 system fnr immediate. i.mple- rilaae I 1t1tC the -.. mentation, is ordered referred to the Regional Parks Advisory Team for ' study and report to the Board of Supervisors within 45 days. r i I. � °}�.e ig�` * e rw'riaw. F i(� �„{-'..`;�f ,�` L e a'#"• ..!���F: y� �. k � s�'t S?'ll� _ 107 V t 18 November 1971 TO : City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution Pertaining to County- wide Bicycle System to Implement the Huntington Beach Bikeway Plan, Phase I At the request of the Environmental Council, we transmit herewith a resolution urging the Orange County Board of 'Supervisors and others concerned with the county-wide bicycle system to implement the Huntington Beach bikeway plan, phase I . Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney DPB :AHB:bc Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 3396 t, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH URGING THE ORANGE COUNTY, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND OTHERS CONCERNED ?'`' WITH THE COUNTY-WIDE BICYCLE SYSTEM TO IMPLE- MENT THE HUNTINGTON BEACH BIKEWAY PLAN, PHASE WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach has expressed its r•" interest in the county-wide bicycle trail system, extending :. . 7a along the Santa Ana River levee from the Pacific Ocean inland' to provide access between coastal and inland cities and a recreational trail. away from the hazard of automobiles; and There are problems in the last mile of the levee trail, near the mouth of the Santa Ana River, which have not yet been resolved; and The City g of Huntington Beach has formulated the Huntington Beach Bikeway Plan, Phase I . which provides an alternate route, less than a mile west of the river, from the Santa Ana River trail onto the Huntington Beach Bikeway at Atlanta to Bushard Street which terminates in Brookhurst Street and continues along B.rookhurst Street, one-half mile Fa on a bike-and-hike path now being implemented by this city, to the traffic signal at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and the gate of the Huntington State Beach; and This section of the bikeway could be developed rapidly because little is required other than the erection of signs ; and i ; Should there be problems in the use of the Flood , Control District right-of-way, the Southern California Edison ; t easement from the Hamilton Substation to the San Diego Freeway would provide safe access between the beach and at least four �r inland cities, 1 . t Y `Y .! _4, t J NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of V; Huntington Beach does urge the Orange County Board of Super- visors , and all other departments concerned with this project, to consider incorporating the Huntington Beach Bikeway Plan, Phase I, in the county-wide bicycle trail system for immedi- %d 5J ate implementation; and The City Clerk is directed to send a copy of this reso- lution to the Orange County Board of Supervisors , the Orange kip County Planning Commission, the Orange County Road Department, the Orange County Flood Control District, the Orange County { ?x, Planning Department , the Southern California Edison Company, f` the Huntington Beach Traffic Engineering Department, the �� Huntington Beach Development Coordinator and the Huntington g Beach Environmental Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City. of ' Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of December, 1971. >t, r2) ' Q . Mayor rCei �,esev , 's `t ATTEST: ; kq C i t y e_tl erk APPROVED AS 0 F131M: %+ Attorney - f { r " 2 • . tFF[• 1 .a Res. No. 3396- STATE .OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss : :r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) . }ti I , PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected . qualified and : acting City Clerk of the City of Iiuntirigton. Beach, and ex ` officio Clerk of the City Council of said City , do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Councilf: of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of ; more than a majority of all the members of said City Council �.K at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th 4?. N4�t day of December 19 71 by the following vote: 4 f=Ear '4 (S AYES : Councilmen: Shipley, Green, Matney, McCracken NOES: Councilmen: None - ABSENT: Councilmen Bartlett, Gibbs, Coen City C .erk and ex.- fficio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntingto❑ Beach , California HE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT IS A CORRF6 COPY OF THE ORIGIN I-OWN FRI IN THIS fiffiff \ +.,;VITEST x - r t v}, cityC' :� i : c U t'G City Comic) of dw Z*. - - � - '. December 9, 1971 Orange County Planning Commission 400 W. Sth Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 Gentlemen: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, December 6, 1971, adopted Resol- ution No. 3396 urging the Board of Supervisors and others concerned with the county-wide bicycle system to implement the Huntington Beach Bikeway Plan, Phase I. Enclosed is a certified copy of said resolution for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:aw Enc. i December 9, 1971 Orange County Road Department 400 West 8th Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 Gentlemen: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, December 6, 1971, adopted Resol- ution No. 3396 urging the Board of Supervisors and others concerned with the county-wide bicycle system to implement the Huntington Beach Bikeway Plan, Phase I. Enclosed is a certified copy of said resolution for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:aw Enc. i December 9, 1971 Orange County Flood Control District 400 W. 8th Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 Gentlemen: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, December 6, 1971, adopted Resolution No. 3396 urging -the Board of Supervisors and others concerned with the county-wide bicycle system to implement the Huntington Beach Bikeway Plan, Phase I. Enclosed is a certified copy of said resolution for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:aw Enc. ti December 9, 1971 Orange County Planning Department 400 W. 8th Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 Gentlemen: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, December 6, 1971, adopted Resolu- tion No. 3396 urging the Board of Supervisors and others concerned with the county-wide bicycle system to implement the Huntington Beach Bikeway Plan, Phase 2. Enclosed is a certified copy of said resolution for your consideration. Sincerely -yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:aw Enc. December 9, 1971 Southern California Edison Company P.O. Box 111 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Gentlemen: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, December 6, 1971, adopted Resolu- tion No. 3396 urging the Board of Supervisors and others concerned with the county-wide bicykle system to implement the Huntington Beach Bikeway Plan, Phase I. Enclosed is a certified copy of said resolution for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:aw Enc. December 9, 1971 Board of Supervisors County of Orange P.O. Box 687 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Gentlemen: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, December 6, 1971, adopted Resolu- tion No. 3396 urging your Honorable Body and others concerned with the county-wide bicycle system to implement the Huntington Beach Bikeway Plan, Phase I. Enclosed is a certified copy of said resolution for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:aw Enc. STk x-LJ NT OF THE ACTION OF C ITI -!3UNC IL ` = 46 Council Chamber, City Hall - Huntington Beach, California .• Mnn g - nctober S, 1970 Mayor Shipley called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 4: 30 o'clock- P.M. Councilmen Present: M _( acken. Ureen. Matney, Coen, Shi le, Councilmen Absent : Rarr_lett Bicycle Riding Signs In response to a recommendation by Councilwoman Gibbs that steps be taken to install bicycle riding route signs on City highways , the Development Coordinator informed Council that the Recreation and Parks Department plans to request the Planning Commission to study the possibility of a trails system connection with Newport Beach and Sunset Beach, for bike riding, hiking and horseback riding. Following discussion, on motion by Coen, Council directed the. Recreation and Parks Commission to develop the criteria for a Trail Element for the City's Master Plan of Land Use . Motion carried . On motion by arepn the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned. Motion carried. Paul C . Jones City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the . City of Huntington Beach California ATTEST: - By Ernestina DiFatio Donald D. Shipley stant Pahl C _ .Tones Mayor City Clerk By Ernestina DiFabio STATE OF CALIFORNIA )-Assistant My Clerk County of Orange ) as : City of Huntington Beach ) I, PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected, . qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their regular meeting held on the,5th_day of October , 19 70 . WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this the 7th day of October 19 70 e City Clerk and ex-of icio Clerk of the City Council of the City. of Huntington Beach, California BY: Deputy 1 •V� recreational OCTOBER 1973traili HA/E 1 ,r . untin ton .beach lan 61ong department :R .y ,cu RECREATIONAL TRAILS PHASE I Huntington Beach, California Prepared by : Planning Department and Department of Public Works Recreation and Parks Department Recreational Trails Committee of the Environmental Council , October 1 , 1013 RECREATIONAL TRAILS : PHASE I SEC i . 0 Introduction 1 . 1 Intent and Purpose 1 . 2 Background and Chronology 1 . 3 Preliminary Plan: Trails Element 1 . 4 Citizen Participation SEC 2 .0 Bicycle Trails 2 .1 Existing Bicycle Trails 2 . 2 Existing Bicycle Trails 2 . 3 Preliminary Plan: Trails Element Proposals 2. 4 Phase I Proposals 2 . 4. 1 Route Evaluation and Selection 2 . 4. 2 Design Standards 2 . 5 • Future Bicycle Trails SEC 3. 0 Jogging Trails 3. 1 Jogging in the Urban Environment 3. 2 Existing Jogging Facilities . 3. 3 Preliminary Plan: Trails Element Proposals 3. 4 Phase I Proposals • 3. 4. 1 Jogging Trail Recommendations 3: 4. 2 Design Standards 3. 5 Future Jogging Trails . SEC 4 .0 Equestrian Trails 4 . 1 Equestrian Trails in. the Urban Environment 4 . 2 Existing . Equestrian Uses 4 . 3 Preliminary Plan : Trails Element Proposals 4 . 4 Phase I .Proposals 4 . 5 Future Equestrian Trails SEC 5. 0 Implementation 5 . 1 Cost Summary 5 . 2 Timing of Development 5 . 2 . 1 Bicycle Trails 5 : 2 . 2 Jogging_ Trails 5 . 2. 3 Equestrian Trails 5 . 3 Future Recreational Trails SECTION 1 . 0 INTRODUCTION 1 . 1 Intent and Purpose This report is intended to present final staff recommendations for expenditure of the $138 , 000 Land and Water Conservation grant for recreational trails in Huntington Beach. This is the first major recreational trails program the City has undertaken and as such is a significant step in the City' s on-going efforts to provide recreational facilities for its residents . The report is specifically directed towards the Land and Water Conservation grant (hereinafter called Phase I) . However, because of some confusion regarding the status of recreational trails , this report will clarify the City' s recreational trail activities and put all programs in their proper perspective . 1 . 2 Background and Chronology Although City activities in the area of recreational trails go back further , studies which lead directly to this program began in April of 1972 when a city staff Interim Trails Committee was formed to prepare a "Preliminary Plan of Recreational Trails" . In May of 1972 the City applied for the Land and Water Conservation grant for recreational trails in Huntington Beach . The grant application was for bicycle , jogging and equestrian trails . The application did not specify how much was to be allocated for each type of trail but the goal was for 26 miles of bicycle trails , 12 miles of jogging trails , and 1-1/2 miles of equestrian trails . In June of 1972 the City Council adopted as a portion of the City' s General Plan the Trails Element : Preliminary Plan and budgeted $138 ,000 for implementation of the first phase as outlined in the grant application. Upon approval of the grant and subsequent construction the City would be reimbursed $69 ,000 . In March of 1973 the City received final notice that the grant had been approved. City staff from the Administrator 's Office , Planning, and Public Works Department began work on putting together a final plan for the expenditure of these funds . 1 . 3 Trails Element : Preliminary Plan The basis for determination of the first phase was the Trails Element : Preliminary Plan. This plan proposes more facilities than can be constructed with the grant money and is a preliminary plan. In addition, it was adopted as a portion of the City' s General Plan and as such its purpose is to serve as a guide for implementation programs , not a blueprint for development. r��r r • 'The, .Planning , Department is in the process of revising and incorporating the Trails Element: Pi-el i•mi.nary PI an ,in the City! s Onen Space Flement . The State Planning Act and General Plan Guidelines .s'tate that trails ' be addressed as part of the Open Space Element and as such allow trails to be coordinated with other important open space programs . Specific proposals of the Trails Element : Preliminary elan will be discussed further in subsequent sections of this report: However, the document does give general standards for the city to follow: For Each 50 ,000 Residents Bicycle Trails : 2S miles Foot Paths : 25 miles Equestrian Trails : S miles At the time the report was presented the City' s population was 130 ,000 and the following was estimated to meet their needs : 130 ,000 Residents (June, 1972) Bicycle Trails : 60 miles Foot Paths : 60 miles Equestrian Trails : 12 miles However the city has grown since then and based upon present popu jation -the need has increased: 150 ,000 Residents (July. 1973) Bicycle Trails : 75 .miles Foot Paths : 75 miles Equestrian Trails : 15 miles : 14 Citizen.•Participation The :staff was, assisted by a number of citizen groups in the preparation of this plan. The .Recreational Trails Committee of the Environmental Council was . involved with. staff in determining where the monies should. be spent : 'i•n, the :first phase . . Presentations were made to the Planning Commiss•ion, Recreation and Parks Commission, and Design, Review, Board. All input was taken into consideration in the formulation of this. proposal . I 2 �� �� _,. . r -. .<:_ ,> _.. ��. <3:. � �� ,, ,_ c, ir. SECTION 2.0 BICYCLE TRAILS 2 .1 Bicycles in the Urban Environment The , recent surge of popularity in cycling has .created increasing demand for providing bicycle facilities. Formerly considered primarily a child"s toy the bicycle .now enjoys great popularity among adults. Along with the increase in bicycle popularity has come an .increase in problems to. provide for them in the automobile ariented .Southern California environment. Over l0. million bicycles' were sold in the United States in 1972 . California accounted for 15% of these sales . It is estimated that more bicycles will be purchased this year than automobiles. The Orange County Planning Department estimates that there .are 500 ,000 bicycles in Orange County. The Huntington Beach Police Department estimates that the City has 90 ,000. or 18% of the: total bicycles in the . County. This adds up to 2 bicycles for every 3 residents in Huntington Beach. The shift . to more of the adult population using the bicycle may accounted to increased interest in the bicycle as a means of trans- portation. With society .looking for alternatives to the automobile the bicycle .is receiving increasing attention. Of course there is the re.cre,ational aspect of bicycling. It is a healthful form . of exercise that cam be enjoyed by young . and old. The recreation orientation. of Huntington Beach, its mild climate, beaches.,' and other .recreation facilities provide an. attractive atmosphere for the cyclist. . With the increased demand and .use of the bicycle has come an increase ,in'. bicycle, safety problems. A 1972 study at the University of California at, Irvine emphasized the incompatibility between auto mobiles- and bicycles when competing . for the same transportation. space.; The; National Safe y. Council'. .:reported a: 78% increase ' for: . the, .196,0-1970 decade in bicycle-automobile accidents . Po ice Department figures . show that bicycle.-Automobile ,accidents have increased. froin. 63' in. 1.970 to .115 in 1972. While bicycle' safety data is 'scarce studies have indicated that almost any, type of - bcycle riding facility improves bicycle 'safety: How �to provide. bicycle .facilities '..is : an. important :consideration. -Being oriented towards the automobile, our experience in ,providing bicycle trails:'is limited. However, ,the demand and need for these. types of. facilities is clear and they must be provided: Huntington . Beach '.is fortunate in receiving one the first grantsin Orange County ,to construct .bicycle trails . .. The future for bicycle trails' appears excellent as.. new . sources of funds are rapidly being brought .toour . at'tentiono . _ It is apparent that bicycles are becoming a permanent fixture in our urban environment and must 'be given i 3 .serious consideration. 4 K { tit:t.•! .. , " 2.: 2 Existing .Bicycle Trails Presently 7-1/2 miles of bicycle trails are within Huntington 'Beach. . Concentrated in two. areas , they have been constructed by the City :and the Orange County Flood Control District. (Refer to Fig, l) The Flood Control District has constructed 4-1/2 miles of bicycle .trails along the Santa Ana River and the Talbert Flood- Cont' ol Channel . , ' The trails are off-street and have complete separation from the "automobile. The City has 2-1/2. miles of trails in this area. 2: miles are on-street and 1/2 mile off-street. . These trails intersect the Flood Control District trails at Atlanta Avenue and the Santa. Ana. River and Brookhurst Street and. the Talbert' Channel. In response to citizen concerns the City •has also recently constructed 1/2 mile, of on-street bicycle trails in the vicinity of Huntington Beach. High School- and . the new Civic Center. These are indicated ' in Figure J. . 2. 3 Trails Element:. Preliminary Plan - Bicycle Trail Proposals The preliminary plan recommended the fo'llowing : . 1... A .primary. system that could. be easily implemented on low traffic '.streets . 2,, A , second'ary system which provides a trail loop, terminus and •intertie :of major .public facilities . ,. This' system is . indicated in Figure 2. The document ;also set forth the' following .considerations' and standards : "The trail system also attempts' ,to coordinate. with ' tho'se ' punned b.y surrounding cities plus elements of the C`ounty.!•s. ,system.' Consideration ,has also. been given .:t'o. a e1/6 ,,mile' ,race- track in the., vicinity of Central Park which could be constructed: of . clay, or concrete with super. elevations. and banking. The. proposed trails can_ and are located so as to follow the" s1mp1est and .flatest terrain possible. Although conditioned bicyclists riding geared bicycles may. be 'able -to travel grades of 8 percent or mote , the general public cannot be expected to do ,likewise . A '6 percent ` grade' 7s','cons.idere.d the maximu*'-for 'gener:al b:icycling'.. x The` minimum width ',fo.r any one-way trail is' to be 5. feet as. demonstrated this proposal. Anything narrower k 1 increa'ses traffic"' hazard when combined with "roads Where necess.ar to use' existin y , g streets ;: bicycle trails are.�recommended on secondary roads , lower speed roads , r and lower, traffic"flow roads wherever possible. When LEGEND: FREEWAY .�� MAJOR. 120'R/W M PRIMARY . 100'R/W s; ---- -' - — ----- SECONDARY 80'R/W \ NOTE: •` .��,.�.e�. \ SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING RIGHT OF AuY / NOT W-MSSARLY ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY /^ CASHED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE NO RXWT OF WAY EXISTS =0 SYMSM DENOTES PRIMARY COUPLET wn a, % \ y% J 1 / CITY.OF Fq z I _ , HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA FIGURE 1 EXISTING BIKE TRAILS ( SEPTEMBER, 1973 ) r . d. %k f�E, 7 . -7r LEGEND _--= FREEWAY �. MAJOR 120'R/W ...M: .. PRIMARY 100'R/W SECONDARY 80'R/W O NOTE: -- - - SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING Rif,HT Of WAY ,\Mee MDT NECESSARILY ULTIMATE RIGHT Of WAY DASHED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE NQ RIGHT OF WAY EXISTS =0 SYMBOL DENOTES PRIMARY COUPLET Y �'L s %` i' I ` _I AA r;, ----- - - ---- -- � m tin primary ( O' � n secondary O terminus 0 1/6 mi . oval , HUNTINGTON BEACH - - ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA AS ADOPTED JUNE 1972 FIGURE 2 TRAILS ELEMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN PROPOSED ROUTES 6 . k - additional paving is necessary to make additional width for safe bicycling; this paving should be separated from the vehicle roadway by at least one foot wherever possible, .giving a separated bike path. The bicycle land on a roadway must be marked with a bright paint stripe or reflectorized material at least 5 feet from the outer edge of the pavement approximately 6 inches in width. This will permit cyclists to ride single file with traffic along the roadway. All routes will be marked with the international bicycling symbol . However, once the primary bikeways are developed and the City enters into secondary trail construction off-road, a system of "trail graphics" .is proposed . . . These may be first implemented in Huntington Central Park on a trial basis and if successful will be used in a co- ordinated system throughout the city. " It must be -emphasized again that this document was a preliminary plan. and adopted . as a portion of the Ci'ty' s' General Plan. The plan recommendations we 're intended .to be a preliminary guide for the, development .of bicycle trails . 2 . 4 Phase I •Proposals , The process of -evaluating where to construct the Phase I bicycle trails began in March of this year . In. addition to the Trails Element , two other proposals were Looked at : The Recreational Trails Committee Proposal of February, 1972 and the Orange County Master Plan of Bicycle Trails . In addition consideration was given to plans from adjacent cities . After extensive evaluation the routes depicted in Figure 3 were selected for the first phase . In determining these routes , ..two approaches were available 1. An extensive on street system which would provide maximum access to all parts of the City. 2 . An intensive off-street . system, which, because of its cost , would serve only a limited portion of the City. It was felt that for the first. phase the on-street system would provide the most benefits for City residents . The proposed route is ' intended to : :1 . Provide linkage between major recreational and intensive use areas Major links. are 7. \� LEGEND- ..... FREEWAY ® MAJOR 120'R/W 6 M PRIMARY 100 R/W ' -- - -- - -- - SECONDARY 80'R/W NOTE SOLID LINESCESS INMATE ULTIMATE EXISTING RI RIf,HT W war k0T NECESSARILY ULTUAATE RIGHT W" WAY ' LINESDASHED INDICATE AREAS WHERE NO RIGHT OF WAY EXISTS -00 SYM90L DENOTES PRIMARY COUPLET CIY� OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY . CALIFORNIA \ • /Ir FIGURE 3 PHASE, I ROUTES (PROPOSED SEPTEMBER 1973) 8. �r a. The beach. b. Huntington Central Park C. All community parks and high schools . d. To or near as many schools as possible. e . The Santa Ana River Trail and the trails proposed for other cities. f. Major residential areas. 2 . Provide for the safety of bicycle users , both young and old, by: a. Designating portions of the street as bicycle trails . b. Placing the trails along least travelled routes as much as possible. C. Placing routes on fully improved streets wherever possible. d. Restricting parking where necessary. 3. Provide the first phase for a bicycle system which will eventually complement an off-street route for the greater enjoyment and safety of cyclists. The Phase 1 route, then., consists of 23 miles of bicycle trails , 3. 5 miles of which will have to be paved adjacent to existing roads. The route provides access between major parks and recreational areas within the city. 2. 4. 1 Design .Standards In developing the construction drawings for Phase I the Public Works Department adhered to the following stand- aids : Fully Improved Street - An 8' or 13' bicycle lane on each side of the street as indicated in Figure 5 . The 13' lane would be used in areas of high demand for on-street parking. Partially Improved Street .- One way bike trails will be 5 ' wide on each side oE the street. These are usually temporary until the street is fully improved at which time bike lanes will be placed on the streets (Refer to . Figure 4) . 9 . ZOO ZOde- do— cANF� ice- 5, VAIJ . I ' PARTIALY IMPROVED STREET -45 5 We- 71?AFF Pam! (,Z)L� A% L31M ROLRF-1544Y .y, FULLY IMPROVED STREET y FIGURE 4 TYPICAL BICYCLE TRAILS Parking = Parking will generally be permitted in the marked bicycle • lanes. In any area where problems occur with bicycles and automobiles then parking restrictions may be imposed by the City as authorized in the California Vehicle Code (Div. 11, Sec. 21207) . �Strri ing� - Bike lanes will be indicated by a 4" wide reflectorized green and white dashed line. The words "Bike Only" and a directional arrow will be painted on the pavement at intersections. Signing - The standard International Bicycle symbol has been selected to mark the on-street bicycle trails . As was mentioned in the Trails Element, these signs should be complementary to a comprehensive graphics system for off_;street trails . Bike route signs will, be .spaced at 1/2 mile intervals on the `bike trails and Wherever the trail changes direction. Bike Crossing- signs are . placed on every street approaching the bike route. The total signing requires about eight signs per half mile in both directions. _ Figure. 5 illus- trates the signing. 2. 5 Future Bicycle Trails in Huntington Beach A problem inherent to fast growing, young communities . such as Huntington Beach is keeping up with the demand for public services. Bicycle trails are no exception. . With the demand, community interest , And new funding sources becoming .available the picture has become somewhat clouded.. It is , perhaps , appropriate that along with the recommendations of Phase I that the City' s bicycle trail efforts 'be placed. in proper prespective : In addition to the Land and Water Conservation grant the City applied for and received $182000,.in matching funds from,''.the County Bicycle Tra.il Fund to construct 6 miles of on-street bike trails that are .on the County' s Master .Plan of Bicycle Trails . Figure 6 shows where these trails are and how they, will interface ' . with the City' s Phase I project and. the existing trails. Work on this .project should be started as soon as Phase I Project is approved. Completion of this project will increase the mileage of " :. •" bike trai'ls .in Huntington Beach to 31-1/2 miles of on-street trails and Smiles of off-street trails . At, 36-1/2 miles , this will - provide Huntington Beach with the most extensive system of .bike trails of any city in .Orange County . This is an eiccellent .start. However, the question is -where do we go from here? Where should the emphasis be placed for future trails? Do we upgrade. these trails. to higher safety standards or do we construct more trails to the same standards to serve more of the population or do we concentrate_ on off-street trail systems? 11 • ;y i Pt BIKE ROUTE SIGN o w� B.IKE CROSSING SIGN FIGURE 5 SIGNING 1 �° 2 ,Fr r`/A - - LEGEND FREEWAY MAJOR I20'R/W PRIMARY IOO'R/W -- --- SECONDARY 90'R/W NOTE - SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTINGt OF r NOT NECESSARILY ULTI MATE RIGHT U Or WAY 11` DASHED LINES UpCATE AREAS WHERE NO RIGHT OF WAY EXISTS _ mWOSYMOM DENOTES PMMARY COUPLET \ , ,A . .L. -o _ ...I \ iLAIN --- existing trails phase I proposals o. .c., bicycle trail fund grantgig © oC% - CITY OF �9ti HUNTINGTON BEACH ` .•ti--� -' *- ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA MIT �`• \ FIGURE 6 CONSTRUCTED ANb FUNDED BIKE TRAILS (AS OF SEPTEMBER 1973) 13. It appears that the bicycling trend is developing to the point that there would be justification for bicycle trails on all arterial streets in the City. Presently the Department of Public Works is pursuing a policy of providing for bike trails on arterial streets wherever it is possible as part of their operational policy in street improvement and maintenance activities . The design standards being used are those set forth in this report . Bike trails could become a part of the permanent design standards for the arterial street system. In addition to trails on arterial streets , a con- tinuing -program of providing off-street bicycle trails could be pursued. The City would then end up with two bike trail systems , off-street and on-street , to serve the bicycling needs of the public. It is the Planning Staff' s opinion that the City' s approach to bicycle trails should be shifted toward a two trail system. Through the Circulation Element and .Open Space Element to the City' s General Plan the future of bicycle trails from a transportation and recre= ation aspect is being evaluated. The City' s Transportation Planning consultant for the General Plan, Herman Kimel & Associates , is evaluating the impact of bicycle trails on the arterial street system. Also latest techniques to provide the most efficient and safe bicycle trails are being evaluated by staff.. . As part of the Open Space Element definite potentials for providing off-street recreational trail corridors (of which bicycles are a. part) have been identified. It is the planning staff' s intention to thoroughly evaluate the validity of the two trail system for bicycle trails. Upon completion of this evaluation and as direct output of the Circulation and Open Space Elements a final plan- for bicycle trails in Huntington .Beach could be prepared under Section 6S4S0 of the Government Code ; Specific Plans. This final plan would replace the bicycle trails section of the Trails Element : Preliminary Plan as the guide for future development of bicycle trails in Huntington Beach. This .report has discussed, in general terms, the issue of bicycle safety. On July 2 , 197�- the City Council' directed the City Attorney to prepare an Ordinance establishing bicycle lanes and regulations in accordance with Sec. 21207 of the California Vehicle- Code . Work on the Ordinance has been held .in abeyance pending completion of this report. With the addition of the 23 miles of on-street- bike lanes to the present 3 miles the need for such an Ordinance will increase. Upon acceptance of this report preparation of the ordinance should commence and be coordinated with the bike trail construction activities to be in effect when the trails are completed. Although not a panacea. to solving bicycle safety problems, the Ordinance along with other community wide. bicycle safety programs will help to provide a safe bicycling environment in Huntington Beach. ®. 14 . I ft 'SECTION 3. 0 JOGGING TRAILS 3. 1 Jogging Trails In The Urban Environment Jogging, like cycling, has become very popular in the last several years. The health benefits of running and jogging have been stressed by physicians. In addition, the sports of cross country running and track have increased in popularity both with partici- pants and spectators. Many schools within the. City have track programs , from the elementary schools to high schools and Goldenwest College. These ,programs are usually run on 1/4 mile tracks and are specially designed for short distance running (1-2 mile maximum) . These facilities do not meet the need of long distance runners, or the person who is interested in slow speed jogging for exercise. Both . these types of runners desire a trail which is off . the street , is several miles long and has a variety of terrain and running surfaces . 3. 2 Existing Facilities The City presently has only one designated jogging facility, a 2- mi1e course at Murdy Park. Other areas are used for jogging but on an informal basis . - At the present time , joggers make do with. whatever , they can find. The streets, beach, schools and parks. 3. 3 Trails Element: Preliminary Plan - Jogging Trail Proposals Nineteen jogging facilities were proposed as indicated in Figure 7. Generally, the document set forth the following criteria: "The proposed trail system for jogging and hiking is given even distribution throughout the community taking advantage of larger parks , open space and existing rights-of-way. The trails will have great value for . walkers, hikers, joggers and cross-country runners. Benefits to the community will be those accruing - to physical, fitness, workouts, competition and recreation. Developed off the road, geographically, they are planned with numerous access points and interconnecting links. The criteria for these trails will include but not be limited to the following : 1. They should be separated .from roadway and motor traffic whenever possible . is - LEGEND _..: FREEWAY 19 - MAJOR 120'R/W 6 PRIMARY 100 R/W -- 3 7 -- - - SECONDARY 80'R/W 16 1 NOTE _ •° SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING PIf,OF * WAY NOT NECESSARILY Y UIiATE RIGHT Wet i DASHED S LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE 40 RIGH,. EXISTS _� �f SYMBOL DENOTES PRIMARY COINIFi \. 15 C4 ) C13) \` ♦� ♦ " 1 . sajnta -ana river ' ' - t/" 2 . edison park site 3. magnolia park site ��, . 61 4: signal bluff 5 . driftwood golf course 9 6 . 17th st. park site 8. signal-h.b . co. bluff - - 9 . coastline \, l0 . inland waterways _ 11 ; flood control channel t 12 . huntin ton central park site 5111 2 ! 1 13. murdy park 14. meadowlark golf course �2 15 . meadowlark airport �ti- ` " -�/- 16 . flood control channel and sunset acgUatic park 17 . marina park s ite ' . . � /^ 18. goldenwest. .college and edison right-of-way 19 . mcdonnel douglas astronautics co. � . AS ADOPTED JUNE 1972 FIGURE 7 TRAILS ELEMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN PROPOSED JOGGING TRAILS Liles 16 . 2 . Preferred surfaces are of grass, compacted dirt , or asphalt. Runners avoid concrete wherever they can. 3. They should be marked with identification signs and markers for mileage every quarter mile. 4. The width of the trail should be 4 feet when poss- ible . This plan, based on the above , also proposes to identify the trails with a graphic system. For competition, it is anticipated that 1 to 2 mile cross country courses will be included in community parks and 4 to 6 mile systems, calibrated, will be placed in Central Park . Mapped courses will be made available at all recreation centers. For the walker and hiker, nature trails such as those designated for Central Park will provide space for 50 people per mile of trail and typically could be constructed the entire length of the coastline in conjunction with both State and City facilities. " 3. 4 Phase I Proposals 3. 4. 1 Jogging Trail Recommendations To meet the .needs of some 2 ,500 joggers and long distance runners, including several record holders, and 200 runners who average .100 to 150 miles of. running per week: an evaluation of where to provide the first facilities was made. The following proposals were developed : Huntington Central Park - Two 2-mile jogging courses : one. on the west side of Goldenwest , and one on the east side , have been. proposed. These are shown. on the map Figure 8,. These trails will have the potential to be expanded into a five mile college course if the proposed footbridge across Goldenwest is completed. Edison Community Park - Figure 9 indicates the one mile jogging course proposed in Edison Community Park. 3. 4 . 2 Design Standards The following specifications were established by the Recreational Trails Committee concerning jogging trails : 17. . T[R TRAIL 0 1000 ' • • • ; j Sol( PUT CII TA1tRYMMSTIMB) Avg." •Xi 1 UW-Lk. - -- ------ - i Avg- FIGURE 8 HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK JOGGING TRAIL ® 18 .1 f ATLANTA AVE 11 T E w Ca H R flEl Ua Hill CF-E - �:-:,�.: q-jFnjj r ear 17, v STILWELL DR TRAIL `7 . .� uror noaa Day c:0li'N •:W � . Fni 6U E N I[1 FIGURE 9 ' EDISON PARK JOGGING TRAIL. 19 Specifications : 1 . Crushed brick or decomposed granite is the most desirable surface . 2. Severe turns should be avoided. 3. The width of competitive courses should be 10-121 . 4. Where course parallels a slope a pathway should be cut into the sidehill to provide level footing. 5 . The start and finish should be layed out as to California Junior College Athletic Code Standards- - Cross Country Supplement 11 . 0321. Start The start of the courses should be free of obstacles and severe turns at the opening rush- should - be avoided . It is recommended that a starting straightaway of from 300 to 400 yar.ds . be utilized. The start of the race should have a potential clear width of 40 yards for competition races. This need not be completely paved as the runners spread out rapidly after the start . - The area should be clear of obstructions for the first 400 yards adjacent to the narrow- -main path of the trail . Finish At the end _ of the course, there should be a straightaway of ,at least 1SO yards ending at the official finish line , which, shall be a minimum of 20 feet in length. After the finish line, a funnel . (temporary installation of ropes and flags) shall be. 25 feet in length tapering to the body of the chute (also temporary, of ropes) which shall be 368 inches in width and 100 feet long. Trail A marker every quarter mile , with .numbers indicating miles and 1/2 miles , with holes for flags (temporary for races) will be set up adjacent to the trails . In addition, during races a lime marking and flags at all corners will be used to designate the route . All trails will be 10 to 12 feet wide and in most cases will be on existing or proposed pedestrian trails within the parks: Detailed design of markers will be worked out with park architects. Figure 10 indicates the concept of the trail markers . 20 . DIRECTION INDICATOR r'" ---- MI LAGE INDICATOR JOGGING SYMBOL FIGURE 10 DESIGN CONCEPT : TRAIL MARKERS Adft 21 . 3. 5 Future Jogging Trails As was mentioned, 19 areas were designated as desired locations for jogging and hiking trails in areas throughout the city. These areas, along with other possible areas should be considered as additional areas to be included in a comprehensive jogging trails system. These areas are designated on the following map. The jogging trails in the three city parks should be considered a first step toward providing a system of jogging trails for the community. } 22 . • ��� equine SECTION 4 .0 EQUESTRIAN TRAILS 4.1 Equestrian Trails in the Urban Environment For the last several years equestrian uses in Huntington Beach has been an unsettled issue . In 1972 the City adopted an ordinance regulating the operation of stables. Subsequently the Trails Element ; Preliminary Plan was adopted which provided a general guide for equestrian facilities in Huntington Beach. Presently, an ordinance which would license horses in the city is being considered by the City. Council for adoption. According to figures provided by interested horsemen in 1972 the city had 3S stables, with a total of 626 horses. Latest estimates indicate there are now 700-800 horses. These stables are concentrated in four major areas of the community, three of these areas being around Huntington Central Park. Stables and equestrian uses are providing an interim open space use in the City. The general areas of concentration (Refer to Figure. 11) are : 1. Western Huntington Beach, around Warner and Bolsa Chica. 2. Directly south of Huntington Central Park. 3. Northeast of Huntington Central Park. 4. Scattered locations southeast of Huntington Central Park. In addition, a, regional trail for horses presently exists along the Santa Ana River. The accommodation of horses in an urban setting is a sensitive issue . Equestrian uses are essentially associated with rural, pastoral settings . As urbanization occurs the horses are usually forced out as are other agrarian uses. However;, there are ways of accommodating equestrian uses in urbanized areas . Cities such as Yorba Linda and Palos Verdes Estates maintain a semi-rural and large lot communities which allow for equestrian uses . Even intensive urban areas such as Central Los Angeles and New York City provide for equestrian uses in large city parks on a commercial basis. Providing for horses in an urban setting is feasible but requires firm decisions and committments by the local jurisdiction. 4. 2 Existing Equestrian Facilities With the exception. of the Santa Ana River Trail there are no designated equestrian trails in Huntington Beach. However a horse crossing exists at Garfield and Goldenwest Street to serve the areas of stable concentration where there are informal equestrian trails °i(heavily travelled routes by horse enthusiasts , either with or without the property owners permission) . 23. /A . LEGEND FREER MAJOR 120'R/W PRIMARY 100'R/W SECONDARY 80'R/W NOTE. SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING W.61t Of WAY NOT NECESSARILY ULTtMA7L RIGHT CO WAI CASMED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHr-(7 NO RG4TOF EXISTS =0S YMM DENOTES PRIMARY COI-PI I I N X., x '/ stable area ii CITY 'OF ��\ HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA FIGURE 11 EXISTING HORSE STABLES AS OF SEPTEMBER 1973 24 . 4 . 3 Trails Element ; Preliminary Plan - Equestrian Trail Proposals The document set forth the following general criteria (Refer to Figure 12) : "Equestrian trails can provide healthful outdoor compan- ionship, the simple pleasures derived from the relation- ship between man and beast , comraderie generated by membership in various equine groups and clubs , and the opportunity to retain back-country atmosphere in an urban setting. Geographically, the proposed trail system ties local stables together,' links the present equestrian areas with the Santa Ana River Trail thus to the State system, connects with the proposed regional and county trails , plus an attempt to tie in local mesa or bluff areas of the City for variation. It also proposes equestrian centers in Central Park •and on Santa Ana River Sanitation District property plus alternates in the vicinity of stable concentration and the Santa Ana River in the northeast sector of the city. Criteria should in-elude the following : 1. Trails off-road wherever possible. 2. Eight to ten foot rail-fenced pathways . 3. toose , dirt bed with, eucalyptus and/or bean pod mulch to minimize dust. 4. Graphics denoting use and direction. 5 . Graphics warning motorists of equestrian crossing: 6. Policing generated voluntarily by equestrian clubs. In summary, these 13 miles of trail will provide the nucleus for a novel recreational resource . It is tailored to the specific needs of this community and provides an additional physically active form of recreation. " 4. 4 Phase I Proposals In trying to make a recommendation on where the first monies should be spent for equestrian trails both• the staff and Recreational Trails Committee felt that there is a lack of sufficient direction to warrant any expenditure at this time . r 25 . LEGEND FREEWAY MAJOR 120'R/W .r PRIMARY 100•R/W ------ - -- - SECONDARY 80'R/W NOTE -- SOLID LINES INMATE MATE RI W W RIGHT WAr NOT NECESSARp-V ULTIMATE RIGHT AY DASHED OF LINES EE INMATE AREAS WHERE NO RIGH XISTS pmSYMEIOL DENOTES PRIMARY COUPLE Y `���• tills,� tttttt ttitt tttt ttttttt tttttt \ .�� I —C y%, local trail tt. ttl•�1 � � . regional trail nnunuu - \ regional link \ j - �1► equine center �,.,°• p alt. equine center ; i oc! � _ _- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHr- ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA \�; AS ADOPTED JUNE 1972 FIGURE 12 TRAILS ELEMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN EQUESTRIAN PROPOSALS ® 26 . Although the Trails Element ; Preliminary Plan set forth a general concept on equestrian trails it did not address itself sufficiently as to how and to what extent Huntington Beach is to accommodate equestrian uses , either on an interim or long range basis. There is no '.doubt that there is a present demand and need for equestrian trails . Stables are operating under City Ordinance and residents are using the facilities. Presently a hazardous situation exists on Goldenwest Street at Ernest Avenue where horses are crossing instead of at Garfield, the designated horse crossing. The staff has not been able to find a solution to this problem given present circumstances . It is the staff' s feeling that before any money be committed to equestrian trails a further definition of City policy on accommodating horses must be determined. It is recommended that : 1. A study , to be completed in 90 days , be done to present specific alternatives for the .accommodation of equestrian uses in the city both on an interim and long range basis. From this study the City Council could formulate a definitive policy for staff .to use in providing equestrian trails in the City. It is suggested that the Planning Department coordinate this study with assistance from the Recreation and Parks and Public Works Departments . 2 . $7 , 000 be set aside from the Phase I grant money for equestrian ,. • trails . The output of the 90-day study would include a recommendation of how to spend this money. Aft27. SECTION 5 . 0 IMPLEMENTATION 5. 1 Cost Summary The cost estimated for each part of the Phase I Recreational Trails is as follows: Bicycle Trails : 23 miles $129,000 .00 Jogging Trails : 5 miles 2 ,000.00 Equestrian Trails : 7 ,000 . 00 (Reserve Funds) Total $138 ,000 ,00 5 . 2 Timing of Development 5 . 2. 1 Bicycle Trails Public Works Department has completed construction drawings , specifications , and engineers cost estimate's for the bicycle trails . Subsequent to approval by City Council, the Public Works Department. will process the bicycle trail plans as follows : A. Final Plans Completed Sept . 28 ', 1973 B. Final Specifications Completed Sept. 28 , 1973 C . Complete Estimate Forms Oct . 5 , 1973 D. Send Complete Package, To State Oct . 19, 1973 E. State Approval and Council Authorization to Bid Dec. 1, 1973 F. Advertise Bids (3 Weeks) Dec. 1 , 1973 G. Open Bids Dec . 28 , 1973 H. . State Approval. and ,Beg-in Construction Jan. 1 , 1974 5 . 2. 2 Jogging Trails The Phase I recommendations for jogging trails are in parks currently under construction. Construction drawings , specifications', and engineers cost estimate have not been completed as of this time . Preparation and processing of this portion will be done by Recreation and Parks Depart- ment and be coordinated with the ,park construction schedule . The entire . $2 ;000 will probably not be needed for these trails and the excess can be used for future trail programs . 40k 28. 5. 2. 3 Equestrian Trails The 90-day study for equestrian uses would be complete by the first of January and a recommendation for the expenditure of the $7 ,000 . 00 forthcoming at that time. 5. 3 Future Recreational Trails Huntington Beach has taken a significant step in the Phase I program to provide a beginning to an excellent trails system. Huntington Beach is fortunate to have an excellent parks system which provides basic recreational ammenities that many communities have not yet attained. It allows the City to turn its attention to programs,. such as recreational trails , to provide facilities beyond a basic park system. The future for recreational trails is bright as new sources of funding are continually becoming . available. Citizen desires and interest in recreational trails is clearly evident. A continuation of coordinated efforts by citizens and city officials will insure that Huntington Beach will indeed have one of,.the finest systems of recreations trails anywhere. • � 29 . r