Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Recreational Trails - Bikeways - Equestrian - Jogging - Etc.
t - REQU5b f FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION i f Dote September 23, 1988 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator Praperad by: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Connunity ServicenA-11 ' Subject: H0WTIMGT0N CENTRAL PARK EQUESTRIAN CENTER COMMIIIFF ApMO'i'ZD HY OLTY COUNCIL 1 {1 19 f Consistent with CouneU Policy? 4yof l l Now Poiicy or Excepti 5ateinent of Issue, ReeornnwWation,Aneiyris, Funding Source,Altcrnativ ct oru A iT c i STATEMENT OF 'ISSUE There is a need to define who may serve as a boarders' representative or , alternate on the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center Committee. RECONWNDATION Modify the boarders' representation section of the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center Committee to state: Boarders' representative and alternate on the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center Committee shall be persons who actually board horses at the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center in the specific row or barn being represented. ANALYSIS Staff feels that the City Council 's intent at the time of forming the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center Committee was to have a committee composed of boarders representing specific rows and/or barns to insure a good line of communication on a continuing basis, and for a fair democratic system to exist on the committee for the hearing of matters related to the equestrian center. The City Attorney indicated in an August 10, 1988, memo that the wording utilized in forming the committee was too broad for this specific definition of a boarder representative. To eliminate confusion and provide a clear definition of who may be a boarders' representative or an alternate, staff recommends that a representative must board a horse in the row and/or barn being represented. FUNDING SOURCE N/A ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Follow procedure set for city commissions and boards with City Council liaisons reviewing applications and City Council voting to select committee members. .=-aATTACW,EHT Gail Hutton's August 10, 7988, memo 0106E/24 I Ag CITY CW HUNT1NOTCXV BNACH �? INTER•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION rMw�04101 MACK To Max Bowman From Gail Hutton and City Attorney Jim Engle Subject Equestrian Center Committee Date August 10 , 1988 Status of Linda Shue After Eviction and During Appeal STATEMENT OF FACTS On August 10, 1988, Cim Engle advised this office by telephone that the Stay of Execution with respect to the Linda Shue eviction had been denied. Mr . Engle further stated that Ms. Shue had accordingly removed her horse from the stable. QUESTION PRESENTED Can Ms . Shue remain on the Equestrian Center Committee? BRIEF ANSWER Yes, unless the procedure is amended. • ANALYSIS The relevant provisions governing the grievance procedure are summarized as follows : 1, Problems of the "Equestrian Center Users" are to be resolved by the procedure. (Emphasi added. ) 2 . "Concerned Boarders" are to submit written issues to the Committee. _l_ 3. The Committee consists of management and community services respresentatives and "representative or representatives for each row of paddocks and each barn with one representative for each twentX stalls in a given cluster and two representatives for clusters up to forty stalls." (Emphasis added. ) A . The Committee will hear grievances, find facts, etc. and "function as an advisory body to the management and City Council regarding center services , facilities and operation ." ( Emphasise added. ) I note that there are no provisions for removal of a representative nor is there a requirement that the representative be from among the group represented. The operative term in the procedure appears to be "a representative for each group. " Accordingly, I find no requirement in the procedure adopted by the City Council which would require the removal of a duly elected representative for a given group. If the intent of the City Council in adopting the grievance procedure was to require that a representative be 1) a boarder and 2) . from amongst the group represented, then the procedure should have been drafted accordingly.' Additionally, since the scope of issues to be presented concerns all Equestrian Center. "users" (NOT JUST BOARDERS) , with respect' to services, facilities and operations, it would appear that dizqualification based upon boarder status would be inconsistent with the broadly drafted coverage of the procedure. -2- CONCLUSION since there are no requirements in the grievance procedure for representatives to be boarders and there are no removal requirements , I find no authority to remove Ms. Shue from her elected committee member position absent an amendment to the procedure adopted by the City Council . GAIL HUTTON City Attorney /cjb -3- G�iS" lrr'7 t� �Ni/ulilfJrrv;: �� rOw. r., - •9p�Jk,e ( mw, hQItr . VIC)JCITY Or NUOMM TON r19"H0 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MAX BOWMAN GAIL HUTTON TO Director of Community services From City Attorney Subjact Eviction Procedure pate April 28 , 1988 We would recommend that the above be amended to read as attached. t�A L Off City Attorney vow HUNTYNGTON CENTRAL PAKK EQU STRIAN CENTER EVICTION PROCEDURE The following conduct constitutes grounds for eviction: 1. Repeated violation of City approved and posted rules 2. Non-payment of fees for a period of 30 days 3. Intentional conduct which creates unsafe conditions for other individuals or horses (examples: unauthorized jumping, not properly controlling your horse or malicious actions that endanger others) The eviction procedure shall be as follows: r 1.. Verbal Warning 2. Written Warning 3. 30 Day Eviction Notice 4 . Eviction process will then proceed through the state judicial system as defined by state law. NOTE: In the case of any intentional conduct which creates an extremely uncafe condition for others, the first two steps in the above procedure may be eliminated. REOUeST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION April 19, 1998 Date Bubnrittadto: Honorable Mayor and City Council $WxWttedby: Paul E. Cook, City Administratoxr , �I• t;A ` pralureJ by: Melvin M. Boman, Director, Community Service yj$4*dv gum: HUNTINGTON CENTR& PARK EQUEST1, IAM CENTER E TY COUNCIL i I y�l•. Covolttent with Council Policy? [ I YM I ) Flew Policy or Excep Y71', I UA A CITY r. Statai mt of law, Recommendation,Analysir, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,AtYad nwtd: SrATElENT OF ISSUE There is a need to establish a boarder eviction procedure fir the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center. RECOIVENDATION Approve the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center eviction procedure for boarders as attached based on the city's rule-making authority as set forth in Section XIII of the city's agreement with Hational Equestrian Centers, Inc. ANALYSIS Pursuant to City Council direction on April 18, 1988, an eviction procedure has been established for the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center. The City Attorney has advised that the city has the authority to establish such a procedure based on Section XIII of its agreement with National Equestrian Centers, Inc. The eviction procedure sets forth the types of offenses that are grounds for eviction, It also d0 ineates acceptable due process. This process utilizes the judiciai system and state law as the final appeal for management and/or boarders. { Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center General Manager has verbally indicated that this process is fair and equitable. The General Manager has agreed to implement the proposed eviction procedure upon approval by City Council . FUWING SOURCE MIA Mo one i RECOWNDED FOR CIT—:OUNCIL ACTION r APRIL 19, 19" HCP EQUESTRIAN CENTEK EVICTION PROCEDURE PACE TWO ALTEMATIVE ACTIONS 1 . Do not establish eviction guidelines. Management and boarders would exclusively utilize the judicial system and state law regarding evictions. 2. Utilize the attached eviction procedure with the exception that potential conflicts regarding evictions would bP settled through the equestrian center's four-step grievance process. 3. utilize the attached eviction procedure with the additional step of review by the Community Services Director before the natter goes through the judicial system. ATTACHR MT Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center Eviction Procedure MMB;mmib 0106E/40 HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK Y. UESTRIP.N CENTER EVICTION PROCEDURY. The following conduct is grounds for eviction: 1. Repeated violation of established and posted rules 2. Non-payment of fees 3. conduct which creates unsafe conditions for other individuals or horses (examples: unauthorized jumping, not properly controllina your horse or malicious actions that endanger others) NOTE: In the case of a boarder's conduct that creates an extremely unsafe condition for others, he or she may receive an eviction notice without prior verbal or written warnings being given. Eviction Procedure 1. verbal Warning 2. Written Warning 3. Eviction Notice 4. Eviction process will then proceed through the state judicial system as defined by state law. o� JIG'rIM CH nM El Adopt rules and regulations for the Equestrian Center as proposed except for: 2. Lbgs allowed in the Equestrian Center on leash only. 6. Axenas 2 and 3 for &glish trainers and custc hers only. No lunging or turnout. Open to boarders When not in use by trainers. Arenas 1, 4 and 5 for boarders. Riding only, no lunging or turnouts. 7. Arenas A, B and C are for riding, lunging or turn outs. Riders have priority. Lesson arena (not Identified - but arena between B and CO to be open to boarders when leawns are not in progress.) Fifteen minute turnout limit. lUrnouts D, E and F far lunging, turnouts or riding. All of these arenas are open to boarders. 9. Jumping allowed provided riders Wear hardhats and an adult "spotter" its present. 18. Publig--is allowed access during open hours. 25. A key to the frost gate will be provided to each hoarder who requests one. 26. Warders' Grievance Procedure: Taro comprises this cannittee? What is the length of term? Who is named as tlse General Manager? When does this committee meet? Boarding-fees be re&XW by $25/mo. immediately. $150/mo. packlodcs (including shavings) and $200/m. for burn stalls - - 71v rules mid regulations were only 5a_= of required action for the Bquestrian Center directed by Cmmil on October S, 1907. *All city ordinances and mxdcipal codes to be enforced. The City attornevls Qf�f��r'ca i s M).=H Y gra jt i r g t-be V r�e�e+ca i r ,.i r.+ in regards to permits not takeI cut, etc. Nait.ing List to be maintained by the city. 7be Camurtity Services DeparV=t is still NOT t3= liDg thin w.itiag liar_ VirinciAl Reoords (Profit & Loss Statements) were to have been turned in this past 11ugust• fiagM sal IMs03..oat bM UM3W An. The Ad Hoc Catmittee agreed in August to wait on reduction of heard payments pending Profit & loss statement results. The Cotcessionaire his refused to cmply - WHY? FAMUM some FAY! M TO: $150/00. pddida*a (includes w0mvings) $200/mo. burn stalls These figures airs consistent with ycxrr own staff survey of stables in Orange County, the Concerned Boarders Survey and the Ad Hoc Committees toura/wANey. In addition, the lease agreement states that fees SHUL W AE MMW BY CCU CIL IN ADVA1M. �; hcr,r�i r»,few„! - have+ Zymmr bum m xW- Alm, the Iease agreement states: Zile Council may revoke any approved fees wfien it APPF.W fees are above varket price. *INSLMANM policies were to be studied for what activities are covered, *C =essaornaire tins tnld to submit site Plzen and stow aim etc. until current hilldings were brought to code xnd applied for and received permits. During that time a Grard Prix Course and Hunt Course, Polo Arena, mash racks and additional tenporary paddocks were built. Why is the ConcFmsien allowed to continue? We ask them the City Attorney exercise the DEFAULT Clause in edintely! REC. JEST FOR CITY CCU'-ICIL. ACTION 0/ oft Movedwr 25, 1987 8ubrnittadto: Honorable Mayor and City Council Subr++itted by: Paul Cook, CI ty Admini strat 'routed by: Melvin M. swung Director, Community Services Sub*t: EQUESTRIAII CEKM RULES AND Rf6UI.ATIOJS �f- Wmi=tent with Cow► l Policy? ( Yap ( J New Policy or F.xorp Wn Statwwnt of Imm. AeoanmwWa;w, Analysis, Funding Source,AKarrwtfvr Action,Attsohr+nena: h•,� STATEMENT OF ISSUE There is a need to establish rules and regulations for the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center. R "ENDATIO1i Approve the rules and regulations attached and direct implementation at the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center. AMALYSIS The City Council, at Its October 5 meeting, directed staff to implement rules for the operation of the Equestrian Center in Huntington Central Park. Section XIIIA of the concession agreement states, "Concessionaire and his employees shall at all times abide by all rules and regulations heretofore adopted or that may hereafter be adopted by city. " Staff has prepared a list of rules and regulations for the operation of the Equestrian Center that can be iapl etmented at this time. The City Attorney has also reviewed the proposed set of rules and concurs with their implementation under Section X1IIA of the concession agreement. These rules are in agreewnt with the recowmandations made by City Council s Equestrian Center Ad Hoc Com fttee, with the four following exceptions: (1) Dogs are not permitted on the premises; the committee had allowed dogs on 4 leash. (2) We committee recommended limiting trainers to two arenas with the remainder being open to the boarders. The agreement calls for only one arena for boarders. The proposed rules provide use by boarders of one upper arena, thret 1owr arenas and three mailer lunging arenas, while limiting trainers to four upper arenas. plasm REQUEST Kul CITY ""AiCI L ACTI01 �.. PAGE 110 EQUESTRIAN CEMM -ULES AND RE6ULA71ONS (S) The coewitta recomended a coebination lock or card lock iWitsa on the front gate for emergency access. These rules indicate there rill be a twenty-four hour phone number for an on-site caretaker available. Also, a key is to be provided to aqy boarder on a short-tern, emergency basis. (41 The coewittem wanted a public trail through or arow.r*J the facility to enhance the public riding facilities. It is proposed that the public be allowed into the Equestrian Center with cause, but Must chrsck 'n at the office. Kanagement will be reasonable if there is a valid reason, such as visiting a boarder. FUNDING SOURCE None ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1 . wait until the financial audit and/or five-Year rerwlatlation period to implownt changes in the Equestrian Center's operation. 2. Modify the rules anA regulations as presented in the attachment. ATTACWENTS Equestrian Center Rules and Regulations Equestrian Center Arena Location Map MB:mb 47O6E/62 1 l6WINTO CElM& PARK M93P4M CEN! RULFS AM Rf ILATIONS 1. Equestrian Center Hours: 6:00 A.m. to 10:00 p.m. 2. No dogs allowed in Equestrian Center. 3. Ted Bile per hour speed limit fc► All vehicles. 4. Parking on concrete parking lots only. S. No driving on dirt surfaces unless loading or unloading horses and/equipment. 6. Arena 1. 2, 3 and 5 (hunt/Jul course) for trainitg and Jump work (no lunging, riding or turnouts, 7. arena 4 for serious, flat or rail work (no lunging, riding or turnouts). Arena A, 8 and C for riding, lunging or turnouts. Riders have priority. Fifteen minute turnout limit. Arenas 0, E and F for lunging or turnouts. All of these arenas are open to all boarders. 8. Turnout 6 for trainers and turnout 7 for boarders. 9. Jumping allowed only if approved by Equestrian Center manage4nent. 10, Helmets required tihen ,dumping. 11, Horses must be walked in aisleways. paddocks, or barn areas. No riding under breezeways or on cement surfaces except to cross driveways. 12. Use cross ties to secure horses. Do not tie horses to rails, stalls or fences. 13. Clean up after your- horse Aen using cross ties or wash racks. 14. All horses being transported in trailers either entering or leaving Equestrian Center must t^ checked in at office. 15. No smoking in barn areas. 16. Alcohol and drugs prohibited. 17. Bicycles must a walked, not ridden, on Equestrian Center property. 18. Public is allcwed access into the Equestrian Center with due cause, but vast check in a: the office. Management will be reasonable if there is a valid reason. such as visiting a boarder. 15. All arenas, including fungi and turnout areas, to be posted including pensi tted activity and userlboarder and/or trainer). 1. HUNTINGTON CM PARK EQUESTRIAM CENTER rage Tiro RULES AND REGULAs iGINS 7u. No profanity or abusive language. 21. All fees shall be posted in office for public viewing. 22. Managew nt must provide to perspective boarders prior to r*ntal a written list of services and facilities include) in the boarding fee. Boarding and othev, fees must hav! city approval. 23. Public day use and overnight use parking spaces mist have proper signege for identification. 24. On-site caretaker' s phone number will be used as a twnty-four hour number. 25. A key will be provided to arkv boarder on a snort-term emergency basis. 26. The boarders' grievance procedure is as follows: I. Equestrian Center General Manager will interface with public regarding any complaints or coax erns of boarders. General Manager will endeavor to provide mitigation measures. 11. If issue is not resolved. the Boarders ' Committee will evaluate and provide a solution, 1II, Director of Community Servi-es or his designee is the next step in the appeal process and will utilize hit authority as defined in the agreement to resolve the issue. IV. City Council is the final step in the appeal process. 2864e l s _ C • —tom cog y1t T•M^ t...m=* t ' _ _ ,�• -+'���.�' �� Cyr o— tY. ell tLi r r ' l/triw I�tINt r rrt.w+ x.i r1 ,S �r� trw ..... , 1 - 4=ft.mft. s I ^ REQL _ST FOR CITY COUK AL ACTION Date ScUL€ be 25- 1() 17 _ Submitted to: The honorable Mayor and Council Submitted by: Council Ad Iloc Committee for the Huntington Beach Eques Cen Grace Winchel'., Ruth Tinley ar d om Mays .i '� Pra�paredby: i0 Grace Winchell , Councilrnember Subject: Huntington Beach Equestrian. Center Ad lior_ Cgrh&itfee part Recom e.nd tions Consistent with Cauncil Policy (XJ Yes I ] New Policy or Excaptipr�/ Statement of Issue, Recommendation,/analysis, Funding Source,Altemat Iwo t o2t� ttachrnents: STATEMENT OF ISSUE �— The ad hoc committee established by Council appointed a citizens working group to assist the committee anti staff in reviewing the city's agreement with the HCP Equestrian Center lessee and in develr.ping recommendations. After numerous meetings in July and August and after reviewing the final recommendations of the citizen.;, the ad hoc committee has completed its findings and is submitting its recommended actions. RECOMMENDATIONS In order to act on the recommendations of the Council Ad iioc Committee, tile rec- commended actions are: 1) Direct staff to strictly enforce all provisions of the municipal and ordinance codes as stated in the agreement: 2) Direct staff to enforce agreement on matters that are enforceable under the present agreement language (to be completer; within thirty days) ; 3) Direct staff to negotiate/implement rules as provided by present agreement (to lie completed within sixty days' ; 4) Direct staff to negotiate matters relating to costs and revenues after finan- cial statements arc available; 5) Direct staff to renegotiate during the five-year review to include recommen- dations of tile committee and staff not covered by firf!sent agreement; and G) Direct staff to report back to City Council with recornmendat ions regarding the "Estoppel Certificate and Consent to Encumbrance" after above actions num- bered 1, 2 and 3 have been completed. ANALYSIS The committee-at-large recognizes and applauds many positive aspects of the HCP i Equestrian Center. Among these is the long-term, positive commitment of the city to provide and support equestrian facilities in a portion of Central Park; also, the permanent compatibility of the center's design, layout and excellent mainte- nance with whatever ultimately surrounds it; the advantages afforded to the city Pro 4194 I 'AN / REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION September 25, 1987 SUBJECT: Huntington Beach Equestrian Center Ad floe Committee Report and Recommendations PaRe two by the combination of public/private investment/management of a public service/ revonue-producing facility; and the safe and controlled equestrian opportunities available to residents with instr:tction in diverse styles, shows, work-out arenas, trails and trail access. The committee also recognizes that after five years of performance dnd experience under the present agreement, some aspects of this public/private venture need improvement. The committee requests that the city address the specific areas of concern itemized on the attached chart lay enforcing the existing agreement, by negotiating and implementing rules as empowered by the existing agreement and by negotiating 5nRle additional matters under ;he five-year review provision of the aSreernent. Subsequent to tli-- development of the citizens' group recommendations, the Council .id floc Committee was informed of the les,ee's request for approval of an estoppel certificate and consent to encumbrance. The ad hoc committee recommends that approval of that document should be considered only after lessee complies with recommendations relating to matters enforceable under the present agreement. FUNDING SOURCE. None required. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Modify the ad hoc committee recommendations at Council's discretion. ATTACHMENTS 1) 'Equestrian Center Citizens' Committee and Council Ad floc Committee Recommen- dations 2) Art Ve La Loza memo 3) Phased implementation of recommendations G) "Estoppel Certificate and Consent to Encumbrance" 5) Paul Cook letter re building permit issuance requirements GW:cs I ATTACHh[ENT 1 EWESTRIAN CENTER CMMNS' MOM AND Gdi1CIL AD HM COil9MU Recommendations CONQTh_ ISSUE VOTE CITIFENS'CO4iITTEE RfCOfl MATIONS MOCK AD HOC RECOlENDATIONS RMAL FEES; Censensus Coe¢ittee is split on the issues of boarding fee amount, roll Split vote on these issues reflecting varying opinfo.rs back and reiobursement. These issues should be addressed regarding appropriateness of existing rental Fee, i.e. pending result of financial audit which will demons!rate supply/demand economics vs. reasonable profit/public whether fee increases were/are ,justified. service. 5-0 Specify clearly in writing to each prospective boarder prior Agree to rental the services and facilities included with boarding fee; receive City Council approval for any boarding fee increase. 4-1 When new facilities are added. boarders way have to pay a Council shall be apprised of services and facilities user's fee depending upon justification in yearly financial included in boarding fee and any changes will require stateiwnts. council approval. 5-0 Post all fees. All fees subject to City Council approval. Agree ARENAS: 3-2 til boarders can use all arenas. turnouts. etc.. Disegre^ e-1 rb more than two of existing arenas to be reserved for Agree exclusive use of trainers. 3-2 Hv core than two of existing arenas to be reserved for Disagree exclusive use of trainers. Consideration should be given to allowing all boarders to have act :ss when not in use by trainers. JUMPING: 1-4 Two arenas with jumps to be used citly by thuse in training and Disagree with trainer present. 4-1 Hararyement to submit a nondiscriminatory procedure for Agree determining when a 'trained` rider can jump with a spotter (other than trainer;. This decision should also include review of the possibility of ht�inS the rider be self-insured er provide insurance. This recommendation is made pending a review of center's insurance require"nts. FWTIK: 5-0 (Ucoonertid continued ongoing attempt by management to maintain AVee and improve footing in all arenas. turnouts. etc. This is to be reviewed quarterly by the equestrian center comrittee. S1UlVM: 4-1 Shavings provided in box stalls at no extra charge. Agree WEditional fees for shavings in paddocks or boarders can provide their own. 3-? Fee for paddocks should be adjusted to reflect that shavings Sawhe as above 'Rental Fees' are not provided. Consensus Wording of the agreement regarding shavings needs to be Agree clarified. i r EQUESTRIAN :ENTER C"ITTEES Pige tiro tt:ower.lWons SWITTEE ISSUE YM CITIZENS' COMMITTEE RECO MENUTIORS COMIL AA SOC RECOMWTIONS • PUBLIC PARKING (TRAILERS, RIGS): 5-0 Sibmit fee schedule for overnight and daytime pudic parking Agree fir review and approval by City Council. 5-0 Identify location and =,O er of public day use and overnight Agree use parking spaces. 5-0 Manage+uent to sut%it procedural pians for reservation of Agree spaces. ACCESS BY PIMLIC RI0ERSt Z-Z Allow public to ride through the center. Public use of other Establish a public trail through or around facility for facilities only with a fee. :1-is recommendation is pending public enJoyoent. Post rules at entry points. This insurance review, recocnendation pending insurance re:iF.r. 2-"L Allow public to ride through center with established See above regulations (possibly including check-in at office and specifying areas that are off limits). This reco-me-n-!ation is pending insurance review. LIGHTING: Consensus Corplete lighting by October. 1987. Agree Consensus Additional lighting of arenas should be considered. Agree MASH RACKS: 5-0 Additional wash racks to be completed. Agree. Verify completion of n .-:ntion basin and pump station for wastewater. LWK FUM LATE: S-0 The on-site caretaker's phone number should be used as a Agree Lventy-four hour number that is available to boarders to facilitate emergency access to center. 5-0 Install combination lock or care. lock systen to facilitate Agres boarder entry. LANliSMUM: 5-0 Complete landscaping by October. 1997. Agree FEEDING CF NORM: 54 Horses to receive amounts of feed requested at no extra charge. Agree DMS'01 LEASH: 5-0 post and enforce leash iat;. Agree HORSE RENTAL SERVICES: 5-0 If the ebstaele of insurance can be overcome, the conri:tee Agree, but trail riding on r:ntal horses should be recommends that there he rental string of horses available to supervised. the general p0lic. 5-0 Riding school should continue expanding its program to Agree maximize services to V..e public. NNUM W MiHAL: Consensus Clarify agreement to rem.e inconsistencies aPJ to define Agree procedure for rewwal and sU;rage of w nure and quantities that are permitted to be put in ar"a. r i EQUESTRIAN CENTER COWIT EES page•thrft Reeo�endatiOns COMITTEE is= VOTE CIT MIS' CMITME RECO)lW"no m COLI CIL AD HM RLSOI*ENfWITIOIIS SUKETTii1C: Consensus City to provide procedure which is certain to verify receipts Agree at center and to ascertain that there is nr subletting. Consensus Examine aepropriateness of the enclave that exists with a Agree. Explore possibility of establishing maximum single trainer having several stalls reserved that fie fills proportion of stalls that can be reserved for trainers. with horses he trains versus utilizing the waiting list to To be evaluated yearly against waiting list demand. fill all stalls. R1A.ES/ REG ATIMES: Consensus Pules and regulations proposed by minagcrent snould be Agree submitted by management for review by Director of Community Services. ;nose rules and regulations should include. but not be limited to, dogs on leashes, public access, speed limits, jumping. turning out hcrses adjacent to o Weer arenas, etc. Consensus Rules and regulations to be posr_d. Agree FACILITIES TO BE COHSTAi1CTED: Consensus Negotiating committee should establish a methcdology in the Agree agreement to identity community priorities for additional services and facilities at the center. Current agreement needs clarification on this matter and the existing list of required facilities needs some deletions and additions. Consensus Sales pavillion should be eliminated from agreement. Agree WAO Dil:>el' PINE IONX COIMOCT: Consensus Per the agreement, oanagesaent is to 'conduct business ir, a Agree quiet and orderly ranner.' Impress upon management the need to maintain a positive, professional image at all times. Consensus Negotiating committee to establish methodology in agreement Agree for determining and monitoring professional cundect including r such items s speeding in golf carts. profanity. professional behavior, etc. LOAROM COWIit 5-0 Establish a Huntington Beach Equestrian Center committee of Agree Comnity Services staff, boarders and Camunity Services COMMIsSion to provide liaison among the cityy. center alai agesent and equestrian community and to evaluate, as needed. equestrian natters relating to courtesies, safety. jumping requirements, service and facility priorities. griev,.nces, etc. 5-O Establish a grievance procedure in the agreement between Agree concessionaire and city which seeks redress from management first, then equestrian center committee, then Director of Community Services and then City Council. i EQUrSTRIAR CENTER COMM3TTEES Page four iecomendati ons i COMITiEE 155UE VWE CTTIIEMS' CaNUTTEE RECdNEIUTI{!MS COOKIL AO NX RFO NMATIOIIS YASTIM6 LIST: 5-0 City shall wintair the boarders' waiting list to insure that Recommend maintenance of a ncndiscriLA natory 'first tame. • Huntington Beach residents are servEd. not just trainer's first serve' waiting list Or paddocks or stalls. clients. Separate list for those waiting ;.o rent in trainers' sret. If1SCELLAlM:OHS RIMOIE1IDATIOWS: 5-0 Managewnt should be allowed to refuse services to individuals Agree who fregiently violate rules as stateC in an established written procedure and subject. to a grievance procedure. 5-0 Safety is of primary cansideration. Agree 5-0 Minimum of two foaling areas of stalls to be provided. Agree J 5-0 No discrimination between ponies and horses. Agree 5-0 Huntington Reach residents should have preference to board Agree over nonresidents. Subject to review regarding legality. 1 2679e/5-)Z Dual 9/14/8T r01411 ATTACHMENT 2 CITY OF BEACH iNTER•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION 1J09 N "M11W ON n+cn To HONORABLE MAYOR JACK KELLY & From ARTHUR DE LA LOZA MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Acting City Attorney Subject Data Equestrian Center September 25, 1987 Recommendations Pursuant to my recent discussions with Councilmember Grace Winchell regarding the above subject, I have rearranged the committee's list of recommendations into implementation Phases I & 11. it Is my legal opinion that those matters reflected under the Ehate-1 heading are probably enforceable under the present contract language as follows: A. May be enforced now without delay, B. May be enforced now pursuant to the broad rule-making authority of the Community Services Director refle.ted in the agreement, but rules need to be negotiated and/or implemented. C. May be enforced now but the Financial Statements required In the contract should be a condition precedent to final decisions thereon. The PJwrll recom mendatIons are matters which should properly be the subject of renegotiations, not only under the five year review provision of the agreement, but pursuant to the general power of the parties to mutually renegotiate the agreement. It should be noted that any of the 45 recommendations may be placed in a different phase should the Council so desire. Thz objective here was to merely provide an orderly presentation of the recommendations with a view toward early implementation of a majority of the concerns on which there appeared to be little dispute. I have not addressed the following since both seem to be subject to the exercise o; discretion by the City Council: 1. The Estoppel Certificate for bank financing purposes. 2. The building permit requirements. With regard to the certificate, the direction I have gleaned from previous discussions is that It should not be approved until all "defaults" have been remedied. Therefore, the certificate should probably be inserted after completion of Phase I: A, B, & C that is after the fees and other important matters are resolved. ]HONORABLE MAYOR JACK KELLLY k MEMPERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL September 25, 1487 Page 2 On the building permit Issue, since the building permit seems to depend upon an Interpretation of the fact; relating thereto, such facts need to be examined by the appropriate city departments and trented separate and apart from the 45 recommendatlons hereinabove mentioned. Thus, the building permit should be processed as soon as possible as a separate matter, except to the extent that the trail easement along Golden West issue should be coordinated with Items 20 And 21 relating to trails. Respe u11y stsbmitted, ARTHUR DE LA LOZA Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENT 3 EgUESTRIAN CENTER COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND IM13LEAIENTATION PHASING PHASE 1: Contract Enforcement A. IMMEDIATE ACTION. CITIZEN GROUP RLCOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL AD HOC RECOMAIL'NDATIONSI fees - Boarder 1. Specify clearly In writing to each Agree. prospective boarder prior to rental the services and facilities included with boarding fee; receive City Council approval for any boarding; fee Increilse. t3-0)2 Z. Post all fees. All fees subject to Agree. City Council approval. (3-0) t=ootinE 3. Recommend continued ongoing attempt Agree. by management to maintain and Improve footing In all arenas, turnouts, etc. Establish allowed maximum percentage of manure permitted. This Is to be reviewed quarterly by the equestrian center committee. (5-0) Fees - rarkitg 4. Submit fee schedule for overnight Agree. and daytime public parking for review and approval by City Council, (s-0) Li hting 3. Complete lighting; by October, 1987. Agree. (Consen5us)3 I Council members Winchell (Chairman), Finley & Mays. 7Citizen Committee vote. 3"Consensus" refers to general agreement. -t- r. CITIZEN GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL. AD HOC RI--COMMENDATIONS Landscaping G. Complete landscaping by October, Agree. 1987. (5-0) Dogs On leash 7. Post and enforce leash law. Agree. Norse Rental Services 8. If the obstacle of Insurance can be Agree, but trail riding on rental overcome, the committee recommends Horses should be supervised. that there be a string of rental horses available to the general public. (5-0) Subletting 9. City to provide procedure which is Agree. certain to verify receipts at center and to ascertain that there Is no subletting. (Consensus) 10. Examine appropriateness of the Agree. Explore poasibIlity of enclave that exists with a single establishing maximum proportion trahier having several stalls reserved of stalls that can be reserved that he fills with horses he trains for trainers. To be evaluated versus utilizing the waiting list to yearly against waking list fill all stalls. (Consensus) demand. Manggement Professional Conduct 11. Per the agreement, management Is Agree. to "conduct business In a quiet and orderly manner." Impress upon management the aced to maintain a positive, professional image at all times. (Consensus) 12. Establish methodology for deter- Agree. mining and monitoring .)rofessfonal conduct Including such Items as speeding In golf carts, profanity, professional behavior, etc. (Consensus) -2- • B. PER CONTRACT, NEGOTiATEAMPLEMENT RULES REGARDING THE FOLLOWING: CITIZEN GI2UUP Itl:t'OAihiENDA'riUNS COUNCIL. AD 110C RECOMMENDATIONS Arenas; 13. All boarders can use, all arenas, i71sagree. turnouts, etc. (3-2) 14. No more than two of existing Agree. arenas to be reserved for exclusive use of trainers. (4-1) 15. No more than two of existing Disagree. arenas to b.- reserved for f�xcluslve use of trainers. Consideration should be given to allowing all boarders to have access when not in use by trainers. (3-2) JumpI�; i6. Two arenas wlth jumps to be used Disagree. only by those In training and with trainer present. (1-4) 17. Management to submit a nondiscrim- Agree. Ina!ory procedure far dt termining when a "trained" rider can jump %vith a spotter (other than trainer). This decision should also include review of the possibility of having the rider be self-Insured or provide Insurance. This recommendation is made pending a review of center's insurance require- ments. Parkin 18. Identity location and number of Agree public day use and overnight use parking spaces. (5-0) 19. Management to submi t procedural Agree. plans for reservation of spaces. (5-0) Public Access 20. Allow public to ride through the Establish a public trail center. Public use of other facilities through or around facility to only with a fee. This recommendation enhance public riding Is pending Insurance review. (2-2) facilities. Post rules at entry points. This recommendation lending Insurance review. -3- CITIZEN GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL AD HOC RECOMMENDATiONS 21. Allow public to ride through center Sec above "i tiblir. Access" with established regulations (possibly lrcluding check-in at office and specifying areas that are off limits). This recommendation is pendmr, Insurance review. Lock Front Gate 22. The on-site caretaker's phone Agree. number should be used as a twenty-four hour number that Is available to boarders to facilitate emergency access to center. (3-0) 23. Install combination lock or card Agree:. lock system to facilitate boarder entry. ' (3-0) Rules/Regulations 24. Rules and regulations proposed by Agree. management should be submitted by management for review by Director of Community Services. These rules and regulations should Include, but not be limited to, dogs on leashes, public i access, speed limits, jumping, turning out horses adjacent to other arenas, etc. (Consensus) 25. Rules and regulations to be posted. Agree. (Consensus) Hoarders Committee 26. Establish a Huntington Beach Agree. I Equestrian Center committee of Community Services staff, boarders and Community i Services Commission to i.•rovide liaison among the city, center management and equestrian community and to evaluate, as needed, equestrian matters relating to courtesies, safety, jumping requirements, service and facility priorities, grievances, etc„ �3-0) -4_ CITIZEN GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL AD HOC RECOMMENDATIONS 27. Establish a grievance procedure in Agree, the agreement between concE,-ssionalre and city which seeks redress froin management first, then equestrian center committee, then [director of Community Services and then City Council. (5-0) Waiting List 28. City shalt maintain the boarders' Agree, waiting list to Insure that Huntington Recommend maintenance of a Beach residents are served, not just non-disc,irninatory "first tralrer's clients. (5-0) corne, first serve" waiting list at the Equestrian Center rand with Community Services. 29. Huntington Beach residents should Agree. have preference to board over non- residents. Subject to review regarding legality. (5-0) Manure removal 30. Clarify agreement to remove Inconsistencies and to define procedure for removal and storage of manure. Miscellaneous Recommendations 31. Management should be allowed to Agree. refuse services to individuals who frequently violate rules as stated In an established written procedure and subject to a grievance procedure. (5-0) 32. Safety Is of primary consideration. Agree. (5-0) 33. No discrimination between ponies Agree. and horses. (5-0) -5- C. CONTRACT NECOTIATION AFTER FINANCIAL STATEMNTS ARE AVAILABLE. CITIZEN GROUP RECOAMNDATIONS COUNCIL AD HOC IZECOMMENDATIONS Rental Fees; 34. Committee is split on the issues of Sp!It vote on thew issues boarding fee amount, roll back and reflecting varying; opinions relmbursement. These issues should regarding appropriateness of be addressed pending result ,.-I financial existing rental fee, i.e., audit which will demonstrate whether supply/demand economics vs. fee Increases were/arc justified. reasonable profit/public service (Consensus) 35. When new iacilities are added, Council shall be apprised of boarders may have to pay is user's fee serv.lc-�s and facilities depending upon justification In yearly Includod in boarding fee and any financial statements. (4-0 changes will require council approval. 36. Fee for paddocks should be Saine as above "Rental Fees" adjusted to reflect that shavings are not provided. (3-2) Sha.._ v ingi 37. Shavings provided In box stalls at Agree. no extra charge. Additional fees for shavings In paddocks or boarders can provide their own. (4-1) 39. Wording of the agreement regarding Agree. shavings needs to be clarified. (Consensus) Wash Racks 39. Additional wash racks to be Agree. Verify completion of completed. (5-0) retention basin and pump station for wastewater. Feeding of Horses 40. Horses to receive amounts of fecb Agree. requested at no extra charge. (5-0) 41. Additional lighting of arenas Agree. should be considered. (Consensus) -G- Iwo PHASE 11: CONTRACT RENEGOTIATION AND APPROVAL BY PARTIES OR ARBITRATION. CITIZEN GROUP RECON111E:NDATIONS COUNC►L AD HOC. RECOMMENDATIONS 42. adding school should continue Agree. rxpandiiig its program to maximize services to the public. Facilities To be Constructed or Eliminated from Agree►nent 43. Minlmur, of two loafing areas of Agree. stalls to be provided. (5-0) 44. Negotiating committee should Agree. establish a methodology In the agreement to Identify r:ommunity priorities for additional s-:rvlces and facilities at the center. Current agreement needs clarification on this matter and the existing list. of required facilities nerds some deletions and additions. (Consensus) 0. Sales pavillion should be Agree. eliminated from agreement. (Consensus) 2S29L 9/22/87 t -7- ATTACHMENT 4 ESTOPPEi, CERTIFICATE ANQ C NS .NT_TO ENCUMBRANCE This Agreement is entered into by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California (the "City") and PACIFIC INLAND BANK, a California State Banking Corporation (the "Bank") . R E C I T A L S A. The City and the NATIONAL EQUESTRIAN CENTERS, INC. ("Concessionaire") have entered into a Concession Agreement for the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center dated October 25, 1982 (the "Concession Agreement") for the finance, design, construction, operation and maintenance of an equestrian center in Huntington Central Park, in Huntington Beach, California (tire "Equestrian Center") . B. WILLARD V. HARRIS, JR. ("Harris") and Concessionaire have approached the Bank with respect to obtaining a loan, the repayment of which would be secured by Concessionaire' s interest in the Concession Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Concession Agreement in Article XI, the City must- consent to any , assignment or sublotting . The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for such consent and certain terms and conditions related thereto THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. consent. Subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, she City hereby consents to Concessionaire granting the Bank a security interest under the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in the State of California in Concessionaire's rights under the Concession Agreement . By such consent, the City assumes no responsibility or liability for the repayment or performance of any obligation in favor of the Bank by Concessionaire. 2. Ngtice gf Default . The City hereby agrees concurrently with the delivery of any notice of default under Article X of the Concession Agreement to concurrently provide notice to the Bank at the address set forth below. The Bank • • shall have an additional thirty (30) days beyond that specified in the Concession Agreement to cure any default which Concessionaire fails to cure. In the event such default is not curable, or if in order: to effect such cure, the Bank must obtain possessioni, the City agrees to allow the Bank such additional time as may be required to cure such default, provided the Bank acts rear;onably and diligently lid attempting to obtain possession, and in the case of any monetary defaults;, promptly makes such payments required to cure such default. 3 . f,{bseauca Tram]~. The Bank shall be entitled, upon foreclosure of its security interest to assign or transfer its interest in the Concession Agreement subject to the prior written approval of the City, which such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld provided such assignee is experienced in operating an equestrian center and is as financially responsible as Concessionaire at the time of execution of the Concession Agreement. A . N 12efa lts. To the hest knowledge of the City, neither the City nor Concessionaire is in default in any of its obligations under tho Concession Agreement, nor has an event occurred, which but for the passage of time or giving notice, or both, would constitute a del:sult under the Concession Agreement. 5. SUCC ,ROrs - This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 6. ASS s ' FeQst In the event any litigation is necessary to i;nforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall he entitled to reco-wer its court costs and attorneys' fees. 7 . ]ROLL-CEO. Any and all notices provided under this Agreement shall be given by personal delivery to the party at the address specified below their signature under this Agreement or by United Stages Mail, certified, return 3146r/5033/03 -2-- receipt requested to such address. Notices personslly delivered shall be deemed given upon receipt and notice sent by mail shall be deemed given forty-eight (48) hours after deposit. a . S'gye r n lag-.Sesa This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California . 9 . Entire Aar em.nf. This constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter hereto and supersedes all prior written and/or oral understandings between the City and the Bank concerning the subject matter hereof. Executed as of the this day of 1987 foci ty" CITY OF 11UNTZNGTON BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION By: Its: Address: Approved as to form: City Attorney "Bank" PACIFIC INW ND BANK, California State Banking Corporation By: Its: Address: 3146r/5033/03 -3- t ATTACHMENT 5 Lim', CITY OF HUPJTINGTC XY BEACH 1019 9cw MAIN onrET CALIFORNIA 11" haul E. Book Public Works Dspwu wn pksr.�or September 1, 1907 (114) 5364431 tic � Mr. Zd Milligan Huntington Central Park louoitrian Center 11381 Golden Nest Suntinqton beach, CA 92648 He: Dedication of Easement/ Miscellaneous Requirements Dear Mr. Milligan: I am sending this letter to confirm the requirements and conditions required by National Equestrian Centers, Inc. and Better Built Enterprises, Inc. as found in the Assignment of Concession Agree- x*nt dated October 9, 1987 as revised herein and conditions placid on you to secure permit to construct a new building on the site. 1. Construction of the water quality separation structure shall be inspected and approved by the City of Huntington Beach and the Regional F/ater Quality Control Board. The structure shall be completed per Regional water Quality Control Board deadline date. 2. Detailed landscape/irrigation construction plans shall be com- plsted and submitted for review to the Department of Public Works by September 300 1987. 3. All required landscape/irrigation as approved shall be constructed by no later than December ' 311 1987. 4. Dedication of a twenty foot slope easement and continuation of existing equestrian trail system along the entire lease line of the Equestrian Center fronting on Golden S. Submittal of a revised site plan for review and approval by City shoring all constructed fncilities on the site and the twenty foot easement. 6. The relocation of the existing chain link fence located on pro- perty line, to the new twenty foot easement line to be completed by September 30, 1987 . City will pay for cost of relocating the fence. . Kr. Milligan - Dp-iicrtion of • • EaseJarnt/f43sc iteq . • •sptomber 1, 1907 Page 2 ; Please have, National Equestrian Centers, Itic. and Better !ui].t Later-- primes, Inc. execute this letter of understanding by signing below and return original dow went to me. veer ly, Pau X. Cook Interim City Administrator PECiDDSsdu act Max Doman Ai►r-id�P,b Y • VKHaR i, f omowc,,� #A4,7 ISE--cco 4'r �JO I r J,&, I-rcof) C", -rG !►�.�,� 'r�t't'�Y�+�.C_ C.,c7�i;r' .�—�c' z ��a�� a 1'1v�'`-�E'- . �. �GV�d• Opp t-� i�� `�'u'��v1 i�� i�►'�d . C '1C�O rti i ti�i cJ!�� , fedole wa�.�tc� ��r�i��-ty I►ke to �bo, , horn.. . p w: 1 i }i I I I At 19 �''► ; ; f i1 Ao �AJ J.IC-i nI n G� ✓W �.r t 1 �_ ��• ,1 /_l1 _ �.Jti 9r, C✓ ,.ham Y- ��rJ�►w► LA -.��✓�J �Li�*V i�! 1i��L��vGL •,/'.j` �'v ,'��.'•'v /�l `'C, • �J•�.�Q.�a�L f .. _ f.l� •.iTC'�.� ri ' .•Myl. .- ��• T•��' � '�_7��./.�.r {* l,� 4, tl_...••.`,f� �./' • .•.. ..mow ._ .. __.l •. aIo ,Z I ' . .! . " CL- (1 `' ! W' :V:Y, p..'►�t'' .V/�!11 �.� 111}',,!✓ J0.h�YL��'L; •YVL.c. :. .:. .. 'ya .L�' /11.' ` r►�� - r) o",Z,.,::' �It �.Jj%i_. 0, ,' �l r Ir/. `j''/ I_!.-�!,S �.'�-W t'���•-i /�r! =M •~ •V'Fr�rr ��/ V'•'��'' 00 r �/4'.W��. . ,••��� �L..'•�_r L�••.� ••y.•.0�+, ...r:1 • •1 iA- �•• '• �� YK �. '• fr'� (/• lv^•. I 1��_ ,. l .//yam/ *.,-� �/�\� .. v !' � r .• . 1i• �f�7�•�ti�,r,ti:.r�rl � 1.' •r �� . .�. •lam Gi •" . Cl i ank o� Po invr in T j Y 'U s. e , btC�s, r�e d l i en J o y 2rj- q o , r)!j . IT" Aeto6 -17h CP Un.�;�. . ear- d lg d ,:A�� ' �,�, E ��-a �1 e� `}�o(A. � are, less �'xppn-.��i V.�_ _.. f`�'►a,►� Qr.Y -: , i ' ��f ... � �yt'�ws�_.`✓,��•hJ+t�. •./.!i,, D rCrv'► I � 46.�I"U.1 `�-Y.! — ' __ .. . ..� .! �•�...�, ``��',� .5 , tie;r- retp d Is ,. r I I • • do -AQ t-ftf Are, o00,Air- .� .f►n: �:. Jv. L��v-.4,16� AA l' 1� t/L' ri�J, •G . rC-G,. r'-��C�_'�'Lr�_ t.r--'G"-r�-,�.�72�J.. �.r-� �'-•�•_�; �• ';�•%S. 'cam. LA44oa) - I^i�`�•'�A•,S�I,;x r,«. � .f, . � , '� _ e.:'.• . — .._. ,•r,�••.•" a.1tf�r-�i[�M�J�"�� r J � . �� � r�* i . nllt, , r: .• to . • •"%!. ,C ` I `'I' i 1 • � :.• _; �/:p✓r1..aC?.t, �+w ..�r;..,�, ...��.,�1�?cis .� ,.��t�: ,—�=� . ..•� ._... : �. 'c�,. ., ,rt ✓� j• .r� �rtr•r f, .�a��!-�.+t.r ���_i•,�, !:✓r' fi4_� � �: i.i� •r. t,I �;• i zy • . : .. Lot 40 06,r ,it `(�•Str /`! r.L. f �. .: t• . ,. ,ice•.l w .� �Y ,�.!Jr'�I� ��` lr.� J f,f ' �,„ f �•r •e +'•• l� -f 1(J �:/ ' ` c .. All 004 r .i;V'�•�' i.. •.�' �!' "� 4./.�'�, �� ';. �M�'� ''ram_'., •� 1{�t'7`. •.1 �:.n .��'��• /lf. 1• 1 1 �• 1, � �� t w� �, ail ,1.••,-4•+�V� Jzloi I ASL/.r •` / , .. ,1 •' ` fl r it �;•v •.11' pp ,„ 1,.. � , ,.r•7,y. y. 'R' .{ '/- JGJ� f! r�rT.r .. I..'l',.y .♦ .1 '' .. ,�J _'•/-� .., + , 4 ` 1 �l• 4 �1 f7• . � L ..... .� -f rr �• � �1 as.� 1 l • ti+ \ i 1 'fi .y'•!1 '� I�.tl r •0,,. art - - .I �" !,! 1. `1 l�d' •��'i"i•��:,'Ct i`1 if'1�/� - � ', ... • .. ...-.. • 1 .L_`.J .. �� car .rlV)+ 4,kpo � J1 ,�Ult o : . jV1,00 .Of 1;.11 U" -LO--ILZJtf� �Xve' nlvil Lod-OA, PI .... 1, lye _r. _ .. � r .Jr +� -f • . - _ �. � ,r ' r, r / -,.' J ////'''•yy)):�,••- r 11 � �• t' _ .:r r 5`R 1� 'rr+.T. ,{,,� 4 r 7 ,J.�`' r ,, .. _ .. 't _.. _..5.....-- r ,-• +}.•'ram' , �+....... ` -;•7 T �, 7 t• r 1. .... r ;'. .. ;.. •v j 1 r'.•,/+. /t rM; ',,T�17 T.i,�'. wi•''t ,� 'ir` r. r ,.7 ..f� ~•••� i1.�1,/J ''r .rc/�1 '•~ �.� �. 5 f' REOUESI r 0R CITY COUNCIL INAp N —September 5, 1989 � Deer Subr�ill to: Honorable Mayor and City Council "MOYBDmy CITY OOUNCIi. luiin�itbd by: Paul E. Cook, City AdmIni strator _ 1' _I-- Poppa repsrsdby: Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Community Servic iu CITY C�.�[ IM: PROPOSITIOIi 7700 TRAILS 9M PROIRM Okla 1046 Corrlel■nt whh council POW (YI Ter 1 1 Now Moi{f or E:co"Mon &aeawlewl of IW^ Reootnnron GOM,Araly*,Funfdit Swrn,Alternative/kti m,Attrdmmis: STA7 MEAT OF ISSUE There is a need to make application for funding for the Trails Grant Program under Proposition 70 California Wildlife, Coastal and Parkland Conservation Act of 1988, RECOMIMIOAT ION Approve the resolution, make a commitment of 0,000 from the Park Acquisition and Development Fund and direct staff to apply for $39,09 in funding under the 1966 Proposition 70 Trails Grant Program with the money designated for use in the development of a signalized trails crossing at Edwards and Ellis. CIS There is $2.S million available through the Trails Grant Program under Proposition 70 California Wildlife, Coastal and Parkland Conservation Act of i 1988. This is a statewide competitive grant program relating to a variety of trails including those that service horses, pedestrians, joggers and l bicyclists. The intersection in question currently has a stop sign on Ellis. The project calls for regular signalization for cars and pedestrians. It will also include special lights and buttons for equestrians that allow theta to activate the signal while sitting on a horse. The Community Services staff conferred with representatives from Equestrian Trails 100 (ET 100) and David Dahl, who is developing the Equestrian Estates south of Huntington Central Park (HCP). It was determined that the greatest need regarding trails is to provide a safe street crossing to connect the three trail systems that exist in Huntington Central Park, the residential quarter section south of Ellis Avenue and the future Bolsa Chica linear Park trails. These parties, with input from the Public Works Department and Community Development Department, are in agreement that the best, most workable solution for a crossing is at the intersection of Edwards and Ellis. i no4M VROPOSITION 70 TRAILS O 0"K PROMAM r"N Page 2 t Septdmber 5, IN9 As noted above, this is a competitive grant program. It is advantageous to have several parties working together. David Dahl and the Huntington Beach Conpany, who have control of the five-acre seetfon northeast of Edwards and Ellis, have agreed verbally to provide public access along the street to connect the HCP trail to the intersection. Also, ET 100 currently helps to keep the HCP trail cleaned and repaired. They will assist in the same wary with the area at the intersection as well as pledge $S,000 to the project. The equestrian organisation has already raised $3,000. The city will also contribute $6,000 from the Park Acquisition and Developaent Fund as a demonstration of support for the project. This $10,000 contribution (ET 100 - $5,000 and city - $5,000) will reduce the grant request to $39,459 of the total project cost of $49,459. Contributions will therefore include property access, labor for save of the ongoing maintenance, ET 100 funding and city funding. Also, the crossing will serve three trail systems while accommodating equestrians, pedestrians, joggers and bicyclists. This multifaceted approach to the project should greatly enhance its attractiveness to the state as a grant proposal. Proposition 70 Trails Grant Program, ET 100 and Park Acquisition and Development Fund ALTERMATIN ACTIONS 1. Apply for funding for another trails project 2. Do not apply for funding through the state grant program 3. Do not use Park Acquisition and Development Fund and increase the amount requested through the state grant by ss"W. ATTACINENTS Resolution Intersection Plan Location Map Crossing Cost Estimate HMO:KK 0706E/65/66 • KAT 4p 0 I 1 J �J 4"Od7 0$ 4P O.,ol • I (� �EO$ s' J I yORBLS h I — EL L �w I ' I � I I l I i I � j � / PuSw evrlows - -- ON OE:L'>! AVVE ~� 4'r 4' 205rS `V I Elo"F—f fHflT_dfwfN/fTi � 1rII ' '• �,msw� J�lam._.✓ .._�� � � •�... 1 ' i .� fir+ti•• ANI t • 00 LOT or 1• ur ,/• LOT f s.wrwwuw .�,-r•(frt• :r�i _ (.�. t 14 AaWS ! SPACIA .M..W t16 . •�•. Id V � •,� ,J� .'��.+• ..r� A,/•• '� •' �. /� .,• . �'Z:.�f-5.�.��. tip ' P T .- V t W/ I TO PARK 'SPACES PROJECT AREA: Proposed Trails Ctnsaing r r CSYTRAL UPAMK MAS.MERPLAN CITY I HUNTINGTON BEACH 597'3 EDMARDa�ELI.I5 SIGMALIZED RAMS CAMIN6 COST ESTIMATE ITEN QwITY UNIT COST TONAL 1- TYPO l-A Polo 1 �575 fsrs 2• Type 19 Poles 3. Type 24 Pole 1 f49025 f45025 4. Pedestrian P.B. Post 2 $346 $690 5. Lueinalres 3 $345 $1,036 6. I11 MI nated Street 11aw Signs 2 $460 $920 7. Three 120 Individual lead g f 57S $4,6W 8. Five 12" Individual Head 2 $690 $1,,300 9. Pedestrian Head 4 f 460 f1,840 10. Pedestrian Push Button 6 $173 :1,038 11 . Pullboxes #3-#S.#6 10 f115 :1,150 12. Loops 11 $290 �3.j65 13. T.S. Conduit 14. Controller Cabinet Foundation $575 $6,325 15. Wire Intersection �575 L.S. ��� 16. Type III Service L.S. f920 17. Cabinet Installation L.S. $460 $460 18. Type 90 Controller L.S. 19. Wire $100925 $298 20. Detector L f Bad-In Cable $349 TOTAL t49,459 JBE:kk 4213e ` ., . t, • a7 ..wry- :cam--.. -;rr r- ' y �6• t K ,;'.fly- >< '�- - - •r!'• F*��"l•-.f 1'�v1i• w �`•-c ) tI rA ,Rr, a'... IF. ;'A. f CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT EXCURSION PROGR/+.H REQUEST FOR SERVICES The City of Huntington Beach Community Services Department is reques ing proposals to supply a package of tours for the community. The following are the par&aeters for the program: 1. Provide luxurious air conditioned motor coaches which are fully insured and licensed with courteous, knowledgable and professional drivers. Each trip to be fully escorted by reliable outgoing tour guides. 2. Depending upon the type of excursion selected, serve Qoiiee: danish, beverages, snacks and assorted afternoon refrembeent;s. 3. Itineraries, incluJing pickup times and various pickup locatiotto with a brief description of the excursion will be sent. to each participant five days prior to each departure. 4. Descriptive fliers for each trip are to be provided to help promote the excursion. 5. All prepayments and reservations are made with the contracting company. 6. Complete insurance coverage for the City of Huntington Beach as additionally insured to be provided. 7. Accountb- , reservations, monthly reports and payments submitted the 15th of each month. 8. Refunds made twice monthly on the lot and 15th. 9. Past history working with other cities preferred. 7hi■ will improve the success rate of each excursion by enabling our city to combine viLb other cities in cases of low registration. 10. Provide a wide variety of exciting excursions quarterly. 11, A sample of a proposed tour package is available at the wsntington Beach Community Services Department. i Qualified eosApanies may submit an informal bid proposal on or before 5:00 P.M., November 26, 19849 to the City Clerk, 2nd floor, Civic Center, Administrative Building, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA. Possible i candidates will be contacted by the Community Services Department. If questions arise, call 536-5486, Jim Engle. i ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINOWN BEACH low-, .f CITY OF HUNrINGTON BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT EXCURSION PROGRAM REQUEST FOR SERVICES The City of Huntington Beach Community Scrvices Department is requesting proposals to supply a package of tours for the community. The fallowing are the ptrameters for the program: 1. Provide luxurious rJr conditioned motor coaches which are fully Insured and licensed with courteous, knowledsablu and professional d6vers. Each trip to be fully escorted by sellable outgoing tour guides. Z. Depending upon the type of excursion selected, serve coffee, danish, beverages, snacks and assorted afternoon refreshments. 3. itineraries, Inciudin6 pickup times and varlous pickup locations with a brief description of the excursion will be sent to each psrticipant five days prior to each departure. 4. Descriptive fliers for each trip are to be provided to help promote the excursion. S. All prepayments and reservations are made with the contracting company. 6. Complete Insurance coverage for the City *' Huntington Beach as additionslSy insured to be provided. i 7. Accounting, reservations, monthly reports and payments submitted the I5th of I. each month, g. Refunds made twice monthly on the lit and 15th. 9. Past history working with other cltiss preferred. This will Improve the success rate of each excursion by enabling our city to combine with other cities in cases of low registration. 10. Provide a wide variety of exciting excursions quarterly. , 11 , A O r-1 o. .e Is vtoL1 �a 1�. C��-�� I��P.a�C c,.►,. �.•s.J �-�+.� �.r'�'dK�in��n..r � '.b� ���c�S� � f s r �( C � C� a ' �` � L�•�►, � �,r._ �` tall a4 ax ell- f} `ram J''► cv�7'` ifT i ,.-36FAtr y �l r . I.n4ft CITY OIL lMt1Im1 MACH c!j INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION n�wriwcn�w� To Alicia Wentworth From in M. Bowman, Director City Clerk Lom unity Services Subject EXCURSION PROGRAM Date October 30, 1984 LEGAL NOTICE To ACCEPT BIDS The Community Services Departumnt would like to contract with a private company to supply a tour package for our local residents. Therefore, we need to advertise a legal notice to accept such proposals. Attached is a copy of the basic parameters for the proposed service. Also included is the listing of proposed tours for the upcoming winter quarter. If questions arise, phase contact Jim B. Engle at ext. 5495. Thank you for your j assistance. MI8/JSE:dp 0959e Attachment PROPOSED TOUR PACKAGH The following tours are the types of excursions the City Is interested In offering each quarter: Hearst Castle . So!vang Ojai Valley Inn Madonna Inn Santa Barbara "Second-Hand hose" Beverly Hills Little Tokyo 'thrift Snops of the Stirs Chinatown Olivera Street Ensenada Laughlin, Nevada Glendale Center Theatre Oc3cansw Gardens Idyllwild Wrigley Mansion Indio Date Festival Shoreline Village Long Beach Alpha. Beta Bakery Tour World War Museum Morman Temple Tour No Host Lunch- Arnold's Farm House Beverly Hills San Diego liarbar Whale Watching Excursion Stewart Orchid Nursery L.A. Arboretum W. C. Fields Restaurant Home of "Fantasy Island' Old Town Music Hall Las Vegas Champagne Brunch at Torrey Pines Historical Pacific Stock Exchange Green Street Antique Row - Pasadena Guided tour of San Antonio Winery San Diego Trolley GAffith Park Observatory Tour Gas Lamp Section San Francisco Tijuana Sacramento ' Lake Tahoe Studio Taping--"Puree's a Crowd" Keno .Callente "A Day At The Races" Panama Canal Lawrenee'Welk-"Mass Appeal' Apple Valley Inn Roy Rogers L.A. Flower Market Center. Dale Evanan ldemoiabilla Museum "Day At Camp Pendleton" f°Cata;" -Shubert Theatre Burbank VIP Studio Tour St.-Sophlas Cathedral Guided Tour Gamble 1fouse Tour Ski Mammoth Major Studio Came Show Taping Sitmar Eton Voyage Tour Knotts Berry Farm SS Fair Sea Movieland Wax Museum Ports 0' Call Long Beach Gondola Ride "lea Cage Aux Polle" 0969e i A • ` REQUE FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTIO441 s" r �� Jtisl 16 r 1984 srb11$lW to: wrmable mayor " City Council 17�' 8ubreMM by: C. W. Th=poon, City Aftinistrator � by: PauL E. Cook, Director of Public Works �,./'� •.. - �,�'� Mim: Bike Trails Project List i MOnont of hm, flewmnrnd tbn,AnWv*, Funding&wror.Altwnetiw A*"%,Atughn*M SMMMM CP ISSM.. WLth 7e start of the rw final year, funds Host be reappt7o xiatad for the oontirxwtion of the bike trails program. i M=CI T: Me'`aillocatian of $282#485 to the a o=mts specified an the attached proja.-t list f mi the (rant Urgffropriatod Fund Balance. ANALYSIS: Mrwi t a fiscal year ended on Jtme 301 1384, those foals budgeted for bike trails were inadvertently not carried forwend into the new yaar. It is now neeessiry far the 00wail to reams these funds in Order to oopplete the projects. PUMIM M94M., 001., UZiE1FAppcqxiated Purd Balance, for $282,485.00. AIEM94NE PLTIGtd eppr twa reeppropriaticn. 9�oeWEN Project List F.I.B. Ci ZSM:ss..jy I No"I BIKE TRAILS PROJECT LIST Account Title Amount 893606 City-wide Trail Design 875 .00 $93616 PCH Bus Stop 6,512.00 893620 Brookhurst/PCH/Garfield 25,280.00 893622 Magnolia 100390.00 893623 Goldenwest 160000.00 893624 PCH Sidewalk 7,757.00 893625 PCH Access Ways 2,975.00 893628 S.A. River Vndercross 1080756.00 893629 Wheelchair Ramps 8,154.00 $93630 Main St. Bike Lane 7,250.00 893631 Talbert Bike Path 2,390.00 693632 Newland Bike Path 2,357.00 893633 Warmer Bike Patti 18,750.00 893634 Hei.1 Ave. Bikeway 5,580.00 893635 PCH Off-load Bikeway 1,353.00 893636 Ellis Ave. Bikeway 5,900.00 893637 Hamilton Bikeway 10430.00 893636 Bolsa Chico Bikeway 3,420.00 893639 School/Sr. Citizens 7,356.00 893640 Sidewalk Access Ramps 25,000.00 893641 Audible Signals 15,000.00 $282,485.00 1 • +J•• CITY CW HUM I UOiM MACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION N,,.en+craN N�er� To CHARLES W.THOMPSON From ROBERT J. FRANL, Chief City Administrator Administrative Services Subject REAFPROPRIATION FOR Date JULY 30, 1984 BIKE TRAILS PROJECT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IN FY 83/64 F.LS. #85-2 I f As required under the authority of Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prspar:•ed and submitted by the Public Works Department relative to the necessary reapproprintion of continuing Bike Trail Projects - to allow for the latter to be carried froward into fiscal year 1984/15. Estimates are that an appropriation of $282,485 would be adequate for this purpose. There will be no fiscal Impact to the City in this proposition, since the funds have Iong since been received, end the particular projects previously reviewed and approved by the City Council. I Rchief Administrative Services Departm t RJFsARsskd i i i i 0597 j/Pg. 2 i r • FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT BIKE TRAILS PROJECT LIST 1, Budget Status The project list was not included in the current budget due to an oversight. It should have bean carried Forward from last year, but was not. I 2. Total Costs A. Direct: A total of $282,485.00 with no anticipated future costs. B. Indirect: The projects are being financed through grant funds under SB 821. There will be no "cash flow" problem because the funds have already been re- ceived and deposited. Maintenance and overhead costs will be minimal and can be absorbed as a part of the City's regular operating budget. Grant reporting and accounting systems for these funds have already been established and are in operation. No City funds are required, but the funds must be expended in a timely manner or risk being recalled by the State. 3. Funding Source A. Funds: SB 821 Grant Funds $282,485.00 B. Revenue Sourcess State Grant Funds d1stributed by the County of Orange. C. Alternative Funding 5ourcos: Gas tax and general funds D. History: SB 821 funds are normally used for this type of project. However, gas tax and even some general funds have been used in the past. • dL eJ� CITV CW HLMTINGTUN ■NACH OLV INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION '" MINIp+G"MCM To Paul Cook From Bruce Gilmer r e , Director of Public Works Traffic Engineer Subject Location of the Santa Ana River Date June 12r 1984 Bike Trail Bridge The projected location of the bike trail will connect the east and west side of the Santa Ana River Bike TrslL The Santa Ana River Bike Trull changes from the west side of the Santa Ana River to the east side at Adams. Orange County and Costa Mena studied the beet location for a pedestrian and bicycle bridge. A location was selected that connected two parks and allowed the east and west side to be connected while minimizing total expenditure. Orange County It proceeding wit► the project after receipt of our General Plan conformance notice dated April th 1984. A copy Is attached. i The bridge should not Increase the traffic In the local neighborhood because almost all the traffic Is to and from the beach. Access to the west side trail was built at LeSard at the request and with the help of the local residents. 1 i BMG:BWtjy Attacht Notice of Conformance 4/4/84 6 raw— 00 1 CITY OF W UNTING'I"ON BEACH P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92646 DEPARTMENT Of DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WOUNNG DIVINON 171415364UI PLAIMININO DIVM#M(7141 SUMI April 13, 1984 J. W. Williams EXA Public Works Design Post Office Box 4048 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Subject: Santa Ana River Bike Trail Ramp Modification Phase I and Bridge Crossing Phase 11 Dear Mr. Williams : At their April 3, 1984 meeting, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission found Orange County's proposed Santa Ana River trail ramp modification and bridge crossing to be in conformance with the Huntingtnn Beach General Plan. I have enclosed the Staff Report and Notice of Action for your review. If you have any additional questions or concerns , please contact me at (714) 536- 5271 , Sincerely Bob Aldrich Assistant planner BA:sr EI)ClOSUres (2) RECEIVED �11�R 1 6 W4 FM4 ti•y. .r.ram.-�..��.- .. _.... ..r.. . I ... . ... .... .... • ... .... - •.:l. lln . .10..•M...r.r n.....�....-.�... �J Huntington Reach Plannint Commission Poo =3� P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 9260 Date: April 4 , 1964 NOTICE OF ACTION �221icant: Orange County Environmental Management Agency Subject: General flan Conformance No . 84 - 3 SANTA ANA RIVER BIKE TRAIL MODIFICATION, PHASE I BIRD : CROSSING, PHASH 11 Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Deach 'Planning Commission on April 3, 1984 and your request was : Withdrawn Approved X round in Conformance Approved with Conditions - (See Attached) Disapproved Tabled Continued until Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code$ the action taken by the planning Coiitmission is final unless an appedl is Mad to the city Council by you or an interested party. Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounds by and ul:on which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved. Said appeal must be accompanied by a filing fee of one hundred and sixty-five ($165 ) dollars and be submitted to the City Clerk 'a office within ten (10) days of the date of the Commission' s action. In your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing fee is April 13, 1984 _ . Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any application becomes null and void one (1) year after final approval, unless actual construction has started. Very truly yours, James W. Palin, Secretary I, P!STrAf f P0 huntington beach development services department REPORT. i To: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATEs April 3 , 1984 SUBJECTs GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO, 84-3 APPLICANTs Orange County Environmental Management Agency RECOMMENDATION: Find in conformance with General Plan. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Santa Ana River Bike Trail Modification Phase I an M dge Crossing (Phase II ) . PROJECT LOCATIONS Generally located at the intersection of the Santa Ana River and Adams Avenue (see attached locational map) . CONFORMANCE ANALYSISs The Government Code of the State of California, Section 65402, provides in part that a local agency (i.e. , the Environmental Management Agency) shall not construct public works in any city until the location, purpose and extent of j such works have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning { agency having jurisdiction as to conformity with the City' s general ! plan. The Orange County Environmental Management Agency is proposing the construction of a bicycle trail on the back side of the easterly Santa Ana. River levee from 1,000+ feet upstream to 300 feet downstream of Adams Avenue, with ramping up to Adams Avenue. ' This will provide an interim crossing on the southerly side of Aches j Avenue bridge joining the easterly and westerly levee bike trails. Phase Il will consist of extending the bike trail 2,850+ feet downstream of Adams Avenue on the easterly side and constructing a bike trail bridge over the river joining Lebard Park and Fairview . Regional Park. The first phase is scheduled to be constructed in June, 1984, and the second phase is scheduled for the summer of 1905. Staff believes the County' s proposal conforms to the policies set forth in the Huntington peach General Plan: i 1 A•FM•aK / r ,_r.�.r..�„..�....,..,. , 1 FI. To capitalize on the outdoor and environmental potential of the City by developing a system of trails linking the City' s parks, beaches and bluffs (Open Space/Conservation) . 2. Maximize the outdoor and environmental potential of the City by providing comprehensive, coordinated recreation, parks anti open space programs that fulfill the needs of all segments of the community (Open Space/Conservation) . 3. Encourage rational use of land and other natural resources (Land Use) . 4. Promote the provision of adequate community facilities within the City of Huntington Beach (Community Facilities). 5. Provide non-motorized transportation facilities, eapecially bike trail3, pedestrian trails, equestrian trails and jogging trails (Circulation) . ATTACHMENTS s 1. Locational map BA:jlm 04©3d --2- 4-3-84 - P.C. A a}y. �``.,1 • ��i : !! ¢f j}! , �t'�Y.t1:=1�r'.'I� �l^,} `w ,r•I,:'w�a �, i,. a �d.fLlu �= �j : I r J�jf t.• ��• PHASE I: .�I14 PROJECT „ ta.�!)( Adams _.—....... _ s Ave J'I.. �)f Ili � 1���-. .__:- _,- ��_ �� Y ��e '���� •._ . ..�f i • w � r � , '' ••�. a!� `-'END �1'• :+1.•L4S 1.✓J � : PROJECT 1 60 r � 'TPHASE U e • _: ---•w-,1 ; ,'� PROPOSED APPROX. I—MATION OF 3 DIKE TRAIL BfUDGE �- . -J 17r �1, `�' ( BETWEEN TWO PARKS) _�; •c 43TA. l 31 + 5 0 •;,,,�.r�� FAIRVIEW .REGIONAL PARK �� \ LOCA' ION MAP BIKE TRAIL CROSSING � OVER SAt�JTA ANA RIPER&GREENVILLE BANNING CHANNEL, SLY OF AUAMS ' BRIDGE Lw SCALE: i"t: 10001 MAR. 1984 K Xx GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 84-3 ` 1 huntington beach planning division 1 • . i REQUEST FOR QTY COUNCIL ACTION Nte My 21, 1934 Submitted to: Hommrable rlayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles Thonpaon, City Administrator� 011-•' ,~0, r , Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing Bridge Over lghg�J ' ief South of Mams Avenue Stmement of Issue,Recomm mdation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actium,Attachm"Its: 00 Statement of Issue: Staff of the atunty of orange and the Cities of Costa Mesa and Huntington Beach wish to Jointly co3stimct a pedestrian and bicycle bridge crossing the Santa Ana River south of Adams Avenue. Reomirer klat:ions: 1. Authoriza the Director of Public Works to participate in negotiations for an agreement behocen the County of orange and tho Cities of ov:ta Mesa and Hunt- ington Beach to eomtruct a pedestriaq and bicycle bridge crier the Santa Ana River south of. Adams Avenue. OPTƔ -).0 2. Approve the encumberanlce of all or a portion of 1984-1985 Senate Bill 821 fields for the construction of this project. 4. • Anal sir: A � Tha existing Santa Are River bicycle/pedestrian trail switches river bank sides, brl necessity at Adams Avenue. The trail is on the east side of the river north of Adams Avermn and on the westside south of Adanu Avenue. HOux +r, there is m ur4eriasa ar, bridge linking the out and west sides at this switch point. There- fore, bikas/padestrians use the Acmm Avenue Bridge for crossing. As a result, numerous :raffiv accidents have o=wr©d an or clear the Adam Avenue Bridge. 21w County of Orange and the Cities of costa Mesa and Hunti.ngtm Peach are acutely . aware of this situation and the County of Orange has agreed to finance and construct+ an underpass.. m the east side, at Adam Av=ue. iyowevwr, the necessity for a separate bridge Linking the oast and west side trails will. still adat. Therefore, the County of orange and the Cities of Costa Mesa and Hurntingtmt Beach wish to enter into a three-my agreement for the financing and construction of a separate bridge linking the east and west trails. In addition to ocraxwLing to each side of the river, the bridge will also link Huntington Beach's Le Bard Par1e. with the Fairview Regional Park. Staff has reviewed the cmoept, with the understanding that the County would assume lead agency responsibilities, and reco mlenr3s Council authorization to pursue parti- cipatim in a formal- agreenmt, between the Cotmty of orange and Cities of Costa Maw and Huntington Beach for the joint financing and cmetrw ion of a bicycle/ pedestrian crossing bridge over the Santa Ana River south of Adams Avenue. Source of EgEding: In accordance with the pdosed agreement, each agency would apply all or a portion of their 1984-85 Senate Bill 821 finds towards the cost of constructing this bridge. ' MO Nat ,.. ... ,..•:......,ram' loom R KAXOt for City Qmncil Action Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing Bridge Over the Santa Ana River May 211 1984 Page 2 Prelimirkuy figures are as Zollows: Estimated poet of project: Construction: $292,000 Canetructian Contlivencies: 581000 $360,000 Revenue Sources: Orange Connty CQntriWti.on; $290,000 City of Costa Mesa: 20,000 City of Huntington Beach: 40LOOO $360,000 Alternative Actions: 1. Approve of three way agreeamt concept but withhold apprava,l of any fwx2ixg. 2. Do not approve throe way agreement oorxept. AttACmaits: Vicinity Map PVC:DERV:lw A ANNING. ZONING M 8 ► SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 8•6-10 LA •• .arrTa ►lws I'ru MCf[• CIT` �� un ttA[;aar►Iltt •r fw �.`.r••••,^. �' rll►.a M �1• 1�, �•4�tU Y VIOIq Mt�P4 Y•O�Y Z./t.�l..�'�.i�•.•� II.I► •.4 Ion► f•4••1 of► l[O�Ma �IU�ITINGT■,/^)'■N I3E�1(�I ::M:� >,�V BEACH y'1.�► 10• w� a�..�.Y M•M• .•►•fl I�.1 Ma■4•vv►H....•.w.cn.•aa- •r�. WI ! ORANGE COUNTY, CALL I' lara nor ORNIA twolt«<ro II AMENOEO W ZONE CASE: f V.1ft•�.Mf,V1.Vf.U•/.M•N,M•►i,N•lI, -� w"W I■Y tt l AOAq! AVIKX l { RI Pt { NI 3, / AAAMS AV£. f 1 c4 w r1 PA At R I +• .._ R I I, At P I ttll RI I r l J 1°� '�►••«■ ' Ct7Nsmer RAMP RII (aG9dRp / FAIRV W R1 PAK K ►ff■ RI gt P ' RI. , •.,,. R0 At ' BR/DS • RI 1 � • REC4N9rRUCr 'nl ' ttt� BIKE RAMP 1 • L 0 CA r/01.MAP d RAQGE At k ru a PAR/ j �f FAJ&j!jf jE ffCID dL PARX. +- ATLANTA AV[ �y Ulm AZA CITY CW HUNTINOT01M nMWH 2*,yp COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOA COMMUNICATION CA 83-41 To Honorable Mayor and From Vincent 0. Moorhouse City Council Members Acting City Administrator Subjact Seniura Softball Date July 12, 1983 With regard to the flyer which is being circulated entitled "Huntington Beach Quilty as Charged" concerning the seniors softball program, it is directed toward the business community but some of the allegations made have a decidedly negative impact upon this city which has been very supportive of its senior citizens . I have asked Vivian Borns to address the issue and have Included a copy of her memo for your information. I feel the city► s policy is fair and equitable to all. I do not think we should discriminate against the majority in order to meet the needs of one group. Therefore , I recommend the policy as adopted be continued. Respectfully submitted, CHARLES W. THOMPSON City Admini trator r by V EN 0. 0 HOUSE Acting City Administrator CWT:VdM:cs / Attachment I i • COMMUNITY SERVICES /u♦II�f.11W DIY 11 Departmental Memorandum TO VinceAt G. Moorhouse F Vivian horns tm7 July 11 , 1983 su"'C'r . Seniors , Softball I refer to the flyer captioned "Huntington Beach Guilty as Charged. " While I realize this is intended to promote community support , it certainly reflects negatively upon our city. Mr. Lou Candiotti discussed his problem with me in January of 1982 , and our department initiated Revolution No. 5093 which permits local organized senior citizens softball g:oups to rent our fields for the same fee as nonprofit youth groups . This is $3 per hour without lights and $6 i per hour with lights . Other adult teams pay $5 and $1.2 per hour, respectively. While the senior citizens softball program is very worthwhile, so are the various organized youtn programs . They all have sponsors and, in addition, pay an individual .fee . We do not subsidize any of them by ; providing balls, bats, uniforms, etc. In our department-sponsored youth softball progralr, each i participant pays $14 . Bats and balls are provided along with officials. However, no uniforms are utilized. ' There are various school fields and, at times, our own fields could be utilized on a drop-in basis. However, the seniors are involved in league play and desire a good quality field on a regular basis. To use Mr. Candiottils own words, we admit to being "guilty as charged. " We are guilty of being fair and equitable to all concerned, youth and seniors alike. If this is not the wish of our administra- tion, you have only to advise us of the change in policy. VB :cs I i i r ..y �` •� 11UNTING 1 U4, fl*AS ►d c9n U;,* � BY THE SENIORS SOFTBALL PLAYERS, ALL 55 YRS. OF AGE on OLDER. I.OW M.O.NY OF THEM? THIRTY (30) PLUS. TWO TEAMS REGISTERED WITH ORANGE COUNTY SENIORS SOFTBALL LEAGUE ASSOCIATION, OUT OF FIFTEEN (15) CITIES REGISTERED, HUNTINGTON BEACK SENIORS ARE THE Oiq Y TEAMS NOT SANCTIONED BY THEIR CITY. WE ARE THE ONLY TEAMS THAT HAVE TC PAY THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO PRACTICE AND OR PLAY ON ONE OF TE IR DIAMONDS. "REPEAT" ALL OTHER CITIES SANCTION THEIR SENIORS TEAMS. HOW?? f BY OFFERING THEM A DIAMOND TO PRACTICE AND OR PLAY ON, NO CHARGED WE IN HUNTINGTON BEACH HAVE TO PAY A MINIMUM OF $3.00 AN HOUR TO PRACTICE i OR PLAY ON ANY DIAMOND. ALL OF THE FIFTEEN (15) CITIES FURNISH THEIR SENIORS WITH DIAMONDS, BALLS, BATS, UNIFORMS, ETC., "NO CHARGE", AND MOST CITIES ALSO PAY FOR THEIR ENTRY FEES, APPROXIMATELY $300.00 A SEASON: FROM MARCH THR J DECEMBER, TEN (10) MONTHS. "REPEAT" HUNTINGTON BEACH IS GUILTY AS CHAr.,3E0 BY THE (TWO) SENIORS SOFTBALL TEAMS. "WHY"? WE ARE NOT RECOGNIZED BY THE PARKS & RECREATION NOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ALL OF ! US ARE ACTIVE AND HEALTHY BECAUSE OF THIS SOFTBALL PROGRAM, (WITH 7 HE GRACE OF *RD) WE INTEND TO CONTINUE PLAYING. IN ORDER TO OVERCOME THIS BURDEN, WE ARE PLEADING TO THE BUSINESS PEOPLE OF HuwrING TOPS 82ACH, FCR THEIR SUPPORT. WE NEED SPONSORS ,WE NEED TO BE WANTED, MOST OF ALL THE BUSINESS PEOPLE WILL BENEFIT BY THEIR SUPPORT, WE HAVE A MULTITUDE OF FAMILIES LIVING HERE. PLEASE GET INVOLVED. LETS KEEP THE HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIORS PLAYING. ALL CONCERNED CAN CONTACT — LOU CANDI (714) 840.312 V AFTER 5:00 p.m. or (714) 651-3956 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. "THIS IS ALL TAX DEDUCTABLE" CALL NOW!! THANK YOU. yt% ;�. • • CITY OF HUNTINGTO" NWWH ;' INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION INNIPW.11w MMH To Charles Thompson, City Administrator From Alicia H. Wentworth, City Cleric Subject Request To Address Council Re: H. B. Dote 7/8/83 Seniors Softball - Louis Candiotti Attached is a communication froain Louis Candiotti requesting to address Council during the Public Comments portion of the 7118/83 Council meeting. His Work phone 0651-3956 Home phone #840-3124 Unless we are informed otherwise, we will schedule this item for the 7/18/83 Council meeting. CC: Vince Moorhouse - Community Services Director I f i i i i i i r HUNTINGTON BEACH GUILTY owwwww AS CHARGED jLl t j BY THE SENIORS SOFTBALL PLAYERS, ALL 65 YRS. OF AGE OR OLDER, HOW MANY ! OF THEM? THIRTY (30) PLUS. TWO TEAMS REGISTERED WITH ORANGE COUNTY SENIORS SOFTBALL. LEAGUE ASSOCIATION, j OUT OF FIFTEEN (15) CITIES REGISTERED, HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIORS ARE THE ONLY TEAMS NOT SANCTIONED BY THEIR CI7 Y. WE ARE THE ONLY TEAMS THAT HAVE TO PAY THE CITE' OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO PRACTICE AND OR PLAY ON ONE OF THEIR DIAMONDS. "REPEAT" ALL OTHER CITIES SANCTION THEIR SENIORS TEAMS. HOW?? BY OFFERING THEM A DIAMOND TO PRACTICE AND OR PLAY ON, NO CHARGED WE IN HUNTINGTON BEACH HAVE TO PAY A MINIMUM OF $3.00 AN HOUR TO PRACTICE OR PLAY ON ANY DIAMOND. ALL OF THE FIFTEEN (16) CITIES FURNISH THEIR SENIORb WITH DIAMONDS, BALLS, BATS, UNIFORMS, ETC., "NO CHARGE AND MOST CITIES ALSO PAY FOR THEIR ENTRY FEES, APPROXIMATELY $300.00 A SEASON: FROM MARCH THRU DECEMBER, TEN (10) MONTHS. "REPEAT" HUNTIN43TON BEACH IS GUILTY AS CHARGED I3Y THE (TWO) SENIORS SOFTBALL TEAMS. "WHY'? WE ARE NOT RECOGNIZED BY THE PARKS & RECREATION NOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ALL OF US ARE ACTIVE AND HEALT'i%1 BECAUSE OF THIS SOFTBALL PROGRAM, (WITH THE GRACE OF GOD) WE INTEND TO CONTINUE PLAYING. IN ORDER TO OVERCOME THIS BURDEN, WE ARE PLEADING TO THE BUSINESS PEOPLE OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, FOR THEIR SUPPORT. WE NEED SPONSORS, WE NEED TO BE WANTED, MOST OF ALL THE BUSINESS PEOPLE WILL BENEFIT BY THEIR SUPPORT, WE HAVE A MULTITUDE OF FAMILIES LIVING HERE. PLEASE GET INVOLVED. LETS KEEP THE HUNTINGTON _BEACH SENIORS PLAYING. ALL CONCERNED CAN CONTACT -- LOU CANDI (714) 840.3124 AFTER 6:00 p.m. or (714) 051-39M from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. j "THIS IS ALL TAX DEDUCTABLE" 4lCALL NOW11 THANK YOU. ej�'4 / 1 i %01r11111t• rl► % NrrIIIIr Of Ihp• lltl, rl,l;rr,• IIr %cii cin cou%, !I. I. IA invited 11) rtldre.. I11.• I•01 t 1.8111111•tl "I Isiblit Its- %'rntla items"hen thaw items Word- Ihr 6.4011111•il. I.Illil•n• ulit he rnlln►•s •61! •111% item on the agriulm a ilemp -1 Illtring Il11' Iw•rlimi is Ih-• tut ,I I, Ilrt,►1►•il lit it'+I 4•••IItr111111.1aIkms. T1wr nay be a time Inter nu.ullr. Iwo .1110 1 lttr.lt Inrl Iitni111unt III milltarp for the Oral COMWw- dro SAME '.1111-st- /�vl2J Se�1d� 1�.1! I �IIIIIIIIIIt .11tttll• I►Il1rr Agenda Item MQ��, (inull•il it. itilr11-1-1rll its %11111 ►t•nlo11.10. llltwrvrr. 011111l•11 yw.►lirV dOell rUM PIPrlwit tahiM. if' If. a►•linn fill M)"I drill. itr,tu_•111 I►t litt• 04111111. Ihrnul!h Its l (�ttrM�IM1lK1K11M, I This foot,,, 11t the (:it% cis-rk s. naiii, nwv trim Mllrl/rlylt 1hI•I>l• to for� M. YI)IR tt.tttll• Will 11.• 0•.1111•01 w ••-1 1••.•t11% too 1.01110' Ill u7www"• AM �IDR�P• are rrn)nlrlt. J�/ 7' ��.i f� •, I;_ /'>I.�- .NIA l h .ram I Welcome Tu A Ileetitig Of the 11UTiVINGTOti BEACH CITY COUNCIL the Public is invited to address the City Giuncil on I'ubliv hearing Agenda items when those items we called before the cowrcil. Citizens may address file cotuicil oil and• item on Use agenda or items of InUrest during the section of the meeting devoted to oral commuiuvations.there nuy Ise a tirne Omit of three minutes 1wr bleaker and total lithe limitation of 30 minutes for the Oral ConiqlWil- Cx1ions YOUR NAME Oti AUUUESSIZ SUBJECTMW JeFY6 fL4)ral Conintunieatiuns 01lier Agenda Item No. ,„�„�, The City Council is interested in your comments. Ilowever, Council police does not permit taking imv"Jate action on moat sterns brouglit to tlic council through Oral Consmusicatkwa. i Hand this form to the City Clerk or Public Information Officer. 'theyy will present them to dw. mayor. Your rusne will be c-Alled in turv. Pleaw be ready to cone to the auiaphone. AU pra. od- kip are recorders. ('11AIC1*4 //Ip,'-7-1-11 1 1 . \ 1 WELCOMir t Huntington Beach Qt Council welcomes you to this meeting. 71w Council meets regularly at 7:30 p.m. the first an7third Mondays cf each month. Study sessions and special sessions rosy be called for other times in the month.All sessions of li:e council,except executive waiona which deal with personnel or matters of pending Wigvtion, are open to the public and citizens are eneasraged to attend. Agendas are availshle to the public at the office of City Clerk, iUbrary and Public Information Office on the Friday prior to regular meetings. Please recognize that mcmbe;-e of the City Council receive their Agendas complete with supporting information sevarnl days before the meetings thus giving the councilmernber an opportunity to study the information and to ask questions of tine professional staff before the City Council meeting.It may appear that some items hoefore the council are handled in a routine manner, but councibnsembers traditionally study all item a carefully before meeting. 11tank you for your interest in city government. !Mayor and City Council -I- n#,,s -1 V REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION qs� Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City C X=il Submitted C. W. 'LbaWson, City Adrnini.st rat:or Of IVprspwvd by, Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Forks i y 7I subject: Allocation of Unappropriated Funds ' SB 821 Project Fund) g Statement of Issue, Reoommandation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: 9TA MHENT Cr ISSUES s mot Gepreferred from the Unaprwopriated Fund Balance to the specified project acoounts for design and amstn ction of previously approved pedestrian and bikeway projects. I E 7" TICK: �-`—RIMation of $71,842.00 to the accounts specified fran the Unappropriated Fund Halanae. ANALYSIS: 9hm�ton Beach applied for and received $40,000 (including interest) for SB 82:. Project applications submitted to 0= for construction in the Coming year. Them projects were act fitted to the AC.'IC in general categoriea of worki i.e., sidewalks, access ramps, etc. The Unappropriated fiend Rilance Psxxamt (R 301) includes revenues received from the Orange County Transportation ComLission (0cm) for Senate Bill 821 Projects. 'Ihe nr+oiect list is shown below, also organized by cameral catectvey, with speci:ic project locatimm identified where they have been determined. ,Each of thews projects will be returned for consideration in detail. by the City Coil wtxn authority y to advertise for hide is requested. The first three projects are reallocations of funds not spelt on aoapleted projects and approved for reallocation to other projects by cm. Aeeaunt Pro ect Cs I MOD S $261617 1. Delaware, N/o Garfield 2. OM frontage on Gothic.-d 631 Talbert Bikeway $ 3,000 637 Hmailton Bikeway $ 2,225 640 *Sidewalk Access Ramps $25,000 (Locations to be determined during design) 641 *Audible signals for visually HarAicagvd $15,000 (9 Intersections to be equipped: currently includes: (a) Main St. @ Florida (c) Goldenwest @ Warner (b) Br okhurst @ Adams (d) Warner @ Gothard *Indicates new project submitted to CL'IIG. FMIN, BCUACE Acoaunt No. R 301, Umppr+ooriated Fund Balance, in the ammt of $71,842.00. I ROW Aequtst for comicil A&ian AllcrAtion of Unapprqwiated Funds SB 821 Prcject Funding MAY 10, 1984 Pape 2 A14TROTIVE AC CHS: cation and direct staff regarding the psoiects for %Wch these furxU are to be ended w.i,.hin the catp=iec applied for to CM. 2. Mlete the majects and return the funds to C=. ATZP Cam: pia' —Dwact Report CW:pWSMfG:jy H CITV OF HUNTINGTON M EACH INTFII.DEPARTMENT COMMUt11CATIONN To Charles W. Thompson From Robert J. Franz City Administrator Chief of Administrative Svcs. Subject Requested Authorization for Date March 23, 1984 S5821 Bike Trail Fund Allocation FIR / 34-26 In response to the Public Works Department. a Financial Impact Report has been prepared and submitted in regards to the proposed bike trail related projects noted in the attached correspondence. It has been estimated that an appropriation of $71,842 would be adequate for this purpose. Sufficient monies are available in the City's unappropriated S6821 funds that may be used for these projects. An affirmative response by the City Council will reduce the uncommitted balance of this grant to zero. tert . Franz Chiefof Administrative Svcs. RJF/AR/cg CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH f I NANC I Al. (MPACT REPORT Project Name "qIjQqted.allll'IiOI'1T.3L�I��Z1..f11I1�LgI1Slr. I Description Requested funding for these projects. 1 . DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 . 1 One-Time Costs urn. , ac - A c uis{ tIon Construction tlos E ui men Other Total Cost 71 ,842 71,842 1.2 Recurrinp Annual Costs Additional afar a s �ut�il�dc P al1 Par onnel SvEpi1ns S rvi s Rev Hues T t l Cos 1.3 Rrplecamant/Ranawal Costs NIA 2. INDIRECT COSTS o S pf interest earning capability due to expenditure of funds. .r.wr r�r•�+.r�w.yr�rr�. 1 If� 1 Financial Impact Report ' Page 2 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS NIA 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT AUraval,of Ibis appropriation will allow for the timely,Comnenccement S f-these oroiects and the attgndant,-gdvantages to be gal ned by yirt to of urrent bid costs. S. PROJECT LISAAE 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING -lubseguent to CitX Council approval. 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT ■S ati,c rn{L will_Urpyai1 with the possible side effect of the City's forfeiting ■ ��-wrrrrr ,j.jr,.jvs"abi 1',t of SB821 funds for future like projects. REQUES i FOR Cl i Y COUNCIL ACTION Date Mar h 20._1984 Submitted to: lionorable Alayor and Ci,,y Council Submitted by: Charles W. lbompson, City Wministralor CLo Prepared by: Melvin M. Bowman, Acting Director, Community Service Sub*-t: HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK EQU STiliAN TRAIL MASTER PLAN ` o I I III loc*f-0,00W •1d' !�4#*0 �. S /b *A. Sotenwnt of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: NO" LTATEMENT OF ISSUE: TH`re R a ee or a master planned equestrian trail In Huntington Central Park that would be compatible with anticipated park uses. RECOMMENDATION: i Ap._ p A ternat17es "A"arid '')✓" of the master plan for the equestrian trail system In ' Huntington Central Park and develop the trail in accoreence with the yearly revised Capital Improvement Program as approved by the City Council. Estimated cost for grading and fencing: $163,000. ANALYSIS: At its Ap 1 189 1983 ineeting, the City Council authorized stiff to prepare a master plan of equestrian trails for Huntington Central bark. ;tuff contacted Cardoza DiLallo Harrington, City's contracted landscape architects, to master plan the equestrian trail utilizing the system that presently exists; and, to provide: alternatives. On March 9, 1984, City staff met with Nuestrinn 'bails, Inc. President, June Transue and Trail Coordinator, Mary 13ell, to discuss the alternatives proposed by staff and the landscape architect. The equestrian representetivices indicated that their organization would be satisfied with Alternatives "A" and "E". Thcy requeAed three items: 1) A connection to the linear Park from the equestrian trail; 2) All facilities in the Huntington Central Park be compatible; and 3) The trail be a "permanent"system. These three issues would be met under Alternatives "A"and "E". They also indicated that the view points or rest areas included by the landscape architect should be omitted as the trail Is not long enough to warrant such areas. The rest areas might also attract th.:general public who would Impact the area and create safety hazards for the pc Kyle on foot and on horseback. Taking the trail Into and through the more active areas (Alternatives 1113"and "C") by the picnic shelter, snack bar and open play areas was a concern of staff and Commission. Potential problems would be created by having the general public recreate in such close pror:imity to the horse trail. Also, problems could be anticipated with children running through the trail or climbing or sitting on the fence. The area would be Impacted by too many diverse groins with potential hazards to all. The Nature Center has averaged over 209000 visitors in the past two years. Looping the! equestrian trail around that facility (Alternative I'D") would create a distraction from its Intended purpose. Horses and Nature Center groups would not be compatible. A number of We"and shrubs would have to be eliminated, especially on the north side where extensive planting has been done for screening purposes. Several asphalt patri used by pedestrians, bicyclists enb Fervice vehicl �s intersect the proposed trail system, thereby creating a hazard for the eyuestria::s. Pro JIM RCA/HUNTINGTON CENTRAL. PARK EQUESTRIAN TRAIL MASTER PLAN March 20, 1984 Page Two Alternative "A" encompasses the paths of the existing trail system in an alterea double loop configuration that pages through two major observation areas, the Midcien Top and Huntington Lake. It totals approximately 1,100 linear feet. Alternative "E" would be constructed when and if the temporary trail along Goldenwest and the A.C. Marion prorerty has been removed. This alternative is 1,00fr linear feet in length, which would bring the total trail to more than the agreed upon 11,000 feet. On March 14, 1984, the Community Services Commission viewed the plans and discussed the entire equestrian trail master plan In detail. The Commission recommended City Council approval of Alternatives "A" and "E" with the rest areas to be elirnlnated from the plan. FUNDING 3OURCM Par AkPur ccgi, s�sition and Development Fund. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONSr . C ootre a Brent alternative or alternatives. 2. Do not master plan the eque3triRn trail at this time. ATTACHMENT: 1. March h ! , 984 Community Services Commission Minutes. 2. Huntington Central Park Egrrestrinn Trnil Study. CWT/MINIS/JBE:cgs 047 5e A EXCERPTS - COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 141 1984 EQUESTRIAN TRA!I, IIUNTINGTON CENTRAL, PARK Staff presented the basic drat master plan of the Huntington Central Park equestrian trail to the Commission. IV following alternatives were designated on the plan: Alternative A - 7be baglc plan encompasses approximately 11,000 linear feet hi an altered double loop configuration passing throug►i two major observation areas, the Midden Top and Huntington Lake. Graded lYsil preliminary cost is $55,000. Alternative B - Extends the system an additional 20600 linear feet; winds through the existing pine buffer edge at the west side of the active use areas to the Nature Center. The trail also extend3 to a hitching post area near "Breakfast in the Park", allowing equestrians the opportunity to ride nrnd dine. Graded T.-nil preliminary cost is $13,000. Alternative C - Provides for a 1,700 linear foot extension, completing the loop back along the linear edge of the bluff at Goldenwest; providing a very naturalistic experience. Graded Tralt preliminary cost is $%000. Alternative G - Wraps completely around the Nature Center. Staff feels this would also create problems with the location since it would go around the Nature Center and would involve a lot of modifications to that area. Graded Trail preliminary cost Is $180000. Alternative E - When and if we temporary trail along Goldenwest and A.C. Marion's property has been removed, this alternative offers a 1,000 linear foot line to the initial system. The trail currently constructed along Taylor Street could remain with a trill turnaround at Goldenwest. Graded Trail preliminary coat Is $5,000. The Trail 100 group requested the following three items be coresldered in the equestrian trail proposals 1. A connection to the Linear Park from the equestrian trail. 2. That all facilities in the park bo compatible. 3. That the trail be a "permanent"system. Mary Bell, Trail 100 representative, stated the group is In support of Alternatives A and E. They are concerned about maintenance cots and request that "elaborate facilities" not be In the trail system so that maintenance Costs could be kept to a minimum. Staff felt the rest areas delineated on the master plan should b;, removed, thereby saving construction and maintenance costs. When the ten foot easement is taken with the widening of Goldenwest Street, the trail along Goldenwest (across from the Mushroom Farm) will be removed. Staff Informed Commission that the equestrian licensing fee ordinance Is on the next Council agenda. If approved, the ordinance will institute a $2..5 license fee for equine. 0470c i The trails will be open for cross-country ►neets sponsored by the high school districts and other ►wn-equine activities. BETTY KE'NNEDY asked where the public would he allowed to gain access to the trail system. Daryl Smith stated that the hc,rses would have to be unloaded at the stable on Fllis, from A.C. Marion's 1woperty o. on Milligan's proltrty. Maybe the City rhould consider an unloading lot for the public to drop off horses. NORMA VANDER MOLEN felt the facility is not really a "public" facility and has a "Problem" with the fact that the facility is not more available to the public. y TOM COOPER expressed concern about the access to the Linear Park. He is concerned i that there might be an exorbitant construction cost for this access He felt that before he could endorse the master plan, fie would need to know what the coat would be for that Access. Staff feels the access would be some type of overpusa. DENE FARRELL stated that he would not support the master plan unless the public has access to the trail. lie felt there should be some type or guarantee nn the City's part, that tl►e "public" can use the equestrian trail. NORMA VANDER A1OLEN felt the 11cen,4c fee should include residents and nonresidents. She is concerned that "residents" will to the only ones supporting the maintenance of the trail. Staff stated the equine ordinance will be controlled by suable owners and collected by ti:e stable owners only for thogc horses hoarded within Vic city limits. After lengthy discunsitm, the following Action was takeni MOTION: RIVERA MOVED, SECONDED BY DYSINGER, THE COMMUNITY SERVICES CUM MISSION RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF THE IIUNTIN(3TCIN CENTRAL PARK EQUESTRIAN TRAIL DRAFT MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES "A" AND "E" WITH THE REST AREAS DEINC DELETED. MOTION CARRIED 11Y THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: COOPER, DYSINGER, KENNEDY, OSNESS, RIVLHA, VANDER MOLEN NOES: FARRELL, FROST ABSENT: BLANKINSHIP, GIESE, JENSEN. ASSENTION: NONE TOM COOPER requested Conimimlon's concerns be forwarded to the City Council In writing, attached to the RCA. 0470c n REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION DM April 29, 1903 &&O*,Wd to: 1knorrAble Miyor and City Council 8ubmhted : C. W. libmpbvn, City Aaninistrator tuo o prapjwW by: P -al E. Cbok, Uirectnr of n,..)Ifc Works tzo ��/lip Sit: Bike Trail Project List ` 09,00 +t�� , W�� 6 /ct. G k CJI t r v Sademmt of Inue, fl000mmandadan, Analysis, Funding Source,Attanatin Actkm,Atumhm tu: STATFMOT OF ISSUE: CoLmil approval is reluimd for the allocatim of SB 821 "mike trail" ftu4s from the furA balanm. Into the pi*n jcct list. lC ]PrTION: Apprvvs the projects listed below and authorize the Chief of Adimnistrative Services to allocate the furls. j 1 ANALYSIS: The enginoeOM work c)t, several "bike trail" projects has now been oarpleted and fins for construction named to be allocated. Mbe projects lasted below will be cmmenaod before the end cf tha fiscal year. lluc City Ivis already received the funds from t1v State and thti projects have been apprmed by the Orange Cbmty Triansportation Cms dwicn. � The listing totals $122,308: 1. Bruckhurst Bike Law: A Class II bike trail From Pal to Garfield $ 7,780.00 2. Yorktaown Bike Lane: A Class II bike trail fran Brach to Ward 8,300.00 3. Mtgnolia Bi zwuy: A Class II bikeway from [Milton to Yorktown 5,140.00 4. Goldemestr Hike Path: A Class tlbike lane froam Warner to PL-J1 310,000.00 5. PC71 SidVmLlk: A sidewalk four 9th to 11th Strocts 2,400.00 6. Wealchair Rasps: A number of wheelchair ranps at ma.rious locations 26,00.00 7. Miln Street Bilge Lorne: A Class II bike lane from Beach (at Five � Points) to 17th Street 18,300.00 S. Talbert Bike Path: A Class I bike path from Goldenwert to Gothard 3,000.00 i 9. Nml.and Bike A Class II bike lane from 1iei1 to Ellis 12,640.00 ' 10. Warner Bike Path: A Cl.a.ss 3I bike lane from A?gcnquin to M grolia 7,828.00 FUN EW SCUM".; 5B 821 horns; on deposit: in account R301. AVIERNATM ACITCHS: DisappnM project, list. ATPAt'HEMIS: FIR JIl i t,WP JS:jy l PiC)4 1 1 I rt .. .w. FJ,-1JL_9 CITY' CW HUNT19MUM dW�H INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION wwolwcww 6241" To Charles W. Thompson F(om Dan T. Villella City Administrator Acting Chief of Administrative Services SutjeJct Requested Authorization for S8821 Date May I 1 , 1983 Bike Trail Fund A)location FIR / 83-49 In response to the Pubiic works D.-partment, a Financial Impact Report has been Pre- parad and submitted in regards to the proposed Bike Trail related projects noted in the attached correspondence. It has been est)nute:d that an appropriation of $122,388 would be adequate for this purpose. Sufficient nunie, are available 1n the City's unappropriated `'8821 funds that may be used for these projects. An affirmative response by the City Council will reduce the uncommitted balance_ of this grant to $3,325. Dan T. V1 i l e l l r Acting Chief of Administrative Services DTV/AR/cg CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT Project Mame Requested Authorization for S8821 Fund Allocatlon Description Requested fundingfor these pro ects. -- - - ....ter. r •r.r..�+�. 1 . DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 . 1 One-Time Costs Land urn., ac - Ac uisition Construction ties E ui nt Other Total Cost 122.188 122 88 1 .2 Recurring Annual Costa ateras s d i roves Td tlona sa oil Personnel Su ltes S ry Rev 1 Cost 1 .3 Replarownt/Renewal Costs N/A 2. INDIRECT COSTS Loss of interest ea rn 121 cUabIIIty due to expenditure of funds. I Financial Impact Report Pogo 2 • . 3. NON-DOLLAR CASTS k. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT Approval of this appropriation will allow For the timely commencement of Chase projects and the attendant advantages to be gained by virtue of current bid costs. �. PROJECT USAGE Qallv._ 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING Subsequent to City Council :oval. 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT _jtAtug quo will prevail with the possible side effect of the City`s forfeiting I the availabilit of 5BB21 funds for future like projects. j 1 INTIIK Superior Court �a k' �� •� �Q�. U !+'TATE OF CALIFORNIA I~ yr'c.�(� , � 1 In attd for the,(',Minty I,f OrarVe � .� , � e y CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CLERK PUBLIC HEARING State ttf(.'aliforttia I County of orange 1'a' APRIL L. ELLIQrr 'r That 1 ant end at all time brain rnentit/nrd was a cilircn of j thr Ihsiied States,user the are o'twenty•one yrats,and that 1 am nut a party(n,rrsr interrsted in the alan•e entillerl matter; that I am list principal clerk of the printer of the i HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REVIEW a t►vviviafsef of general citculatbtn,imblished in the Oily of HUNTINGTON BEACH s. r County of Orange and which tww.pnitr•r is published hot the diseminal6n tsf Itrcal oasis anrf intelligence of a Rnural charac- ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentitttsed haJ and still has a Irma We sulocription list of peiying stllrlerlivro. and which newspaper has been t•tabliahtd,printed and puts- lisped at regular inletrata in the acid County of Orange foe % periml t.creding one yrar, that the nitice, of which the amused is a printed copy. It= Iron published In the regular . '4 end entire isnrt sit said ntwspriwr,anti nit(in any suppl.matt thtm)f,tin the fulliming datra.lei wit,. Nov. of t982 1 certify Isar declare)undtr penalty of perjury tluYl the forrga- ing is I rue and atnrel. Dated at.....$AR..... GROVE......................... catiftxrsi.,this day or Signature m P �- I k� UJA-V�_ . I Form No.POP 02002 • REQUES i FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date November 15. 11-4a2�.._. Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council y SvbmitW by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato all• James W. Pa lin, Director of Development Services Salt: Amendments to the C ty's Master Plan of Aikeways. Swenwt of linos,RecommWK st n,A m4y is, fwdinp Source,Vwmathre Ac5ma,Attsahmrnu: Statement of Issue.- in order to continue with the implementation and maintenance of the City's bikeway system revisions to the existing Plan are necessary. The proposed amendment reflects the intent of the Trails InElementation Plan which calls for the City to provide bicycle lanes along arterial— streets that provide direct access to activity centers. Present monies available exceed the amount of projects presently iden- tified on the existing Master Plan of Bikeways. The approval of a revised Master Plan of Bikeways will enable the City to continue impl- ementing one of the model bikeway systems in Southern California. Recommendation: Approve the proposed amendment to the Master Plan of Bikeways in order to provide greater accesu to activity centers along the City's art- erial streets. Analysis: The Trails Implementation Plan has proved to be extremely valuable to t e ci y For the. preparation of grant applications for bikeway deve- lopment. The majority of the trails identified have been completed and the need for additional trails has been identified. Staff has prepared and the Planning Commission has approved revisions to the Master Plan of Bikeways. The revised map shows all the newly proposed routes, those proposed and not completed from pant plane, and routes completed in conjunction with street widening projecta and previously not included on the master plan. The need for revisions at this time is twofold: 1) To reflect the changing need for bikeways within the City, and 2) to prepare an updated document for the appli- cation of future bikeway funding and implementation of bikeway projects with existing bikeway funds. Supporting information: The City of Huntingtcn Beach began bikeway planning and development in 1970 with the drafting of the Huntington Beach Bikeways Plan, „ l �o�nsr Phase 1. The Plan included 60 miles of bikeways within the City which nor onnected with the then nei? Orange County Master Plan of Bikewaya. The City received money from the County for implementation of portions of the initial Plan. On October 51 1970, City Council directed staff to develop the criteria, for a Trails Element to the City'a Master Plan of Land Use. In June# 1972 the Trails Element Preliminary Plan was adopted by City Council. The Trails Clement included the bikeways plan previously developed along with equestrian and jogging trails. In October, 1973 the Recrea- tional Trails Phase I document was prepared in order for the Ci y� eeFn mplementing the Trails Element. The document proposed 75 miles of bicycle trails for the City; the majority of these trails have been developed. With the completion of many oz the trails identified in the Recreational Trails Element, the document became outdated and the need for a t- ons trai A planning arose. In March, 1978 the City Council adopted the Trails Implementation Plan and deleted the Pecreational Trails Element from the General Plan. The plan called .For the ultimate deve- lopment of 138 miles of bikeways in the City (69 Niles were in exis- tence at that time) . The Trails Implementation Plan proposed a phased implementation schedule for Mkeway development. All but approximately 15 miles of tha proposed system has been completed. Minor revisions to the plan have been made with the latest occurring along with the City Council's adoption of the Coastal Element. Funding Source: Funding sources for the development and maintenance of bicycle trails are presented in the Trailer Implementation Plan. Funds are generally derived from various State, County and local funding sources. Alternative Actions: Do not approve the amendment to the Master Plan of Bikeways, thus dev- eloping with existing and future funding only those trails identified on the existing Master Plan of Bikeway ( only 15 miles of trails remain to be developed) . This alternative may risk the availability of future grant funds and may require the City to return unspent funds from past years programs. Attachment: 1. Mastei Plan of Bikeways as adopted by the Planning Commission. 2. Resolution No. MA:dw • �l1% �y r Publish November 42 1982 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER PLAN OF BIKEWAYS NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City CcunciI of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of _ 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monda�l_y_^ the 15th day of November , 1.9 82• for the purpose of considering the Huntington Deach Master Plan of Hikeways, for the addition of links to the existing system. Nertive Declaration No. 82-39 will also be considered in conjunction with said matter. f I i All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said Amendment to the Master Plan of Bikeways 6 Negative elaration 82-38. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach. California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED November 2, 1982 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk W)TICF TO 7,LERM TO SCHEDULE PLMLIC�1H-E�ARING TO: CITY CLEWS OFFICE DATE: FRAM: _s. PLEASE SCHEDUIX A PUBLIC HEARING USINC THE ATTACHED LEGAL Ngrl(;E FOR THE _DAY OP _ -g^/ AP'• are attached AP's Will follow 1 No APIs Initiated by: Planning Comwission Planning Department ./ I Petition * Appeal i Other ov-35 Adoption of Environmental Status W .77GG�� YES Nil Refer to �M � i'InnntnK Popartmunt - Fxte notan for adfl tional information. i * if meal , pl_ase transmit exact wording to he required in the legal . ' r �t- l �. ` .:�a•.'1j•}'�t�i' i'L:'.L, �' :t; fi11:i: n •��Ih s'IE'1, •S ''�'1'Ji'': ' . i!'\::.+.',• + : `.':... :..�, .I (•ll�, � 1l' :1 .:,1' 1 .1•, '.:I i _ ,i•:' :�: l�: al� 1:t:1• C1' ;' . .:...• . . ..�. . : .. � 1i,' l' i ( fit' �). 11,... . ..�j1 . .' .i.::, , f� ti L,•. I'1 ,+J1 01 !+l i:t'::.,' ,. lit+' 1 1 1„ t,l :. t � .� s i l� .i A o p�'�a~ ctJ•t> rho .ir. .emu.• w.�� !��/^+.:� i "7:yo �� (S Said hc-arilr+i t,ril. l be �IlL1:1 .1L Lllt: huui• Of _ +i on • `ALL, "I"'�"'Ji� 1 'r'L•' , 111 C1tC Council C.11i11I1:J,-:r:.i imi_minq of tlt,.: 1111l1LingLol1 lit.-ILW11, All l�i� i:J'�::i1:f3�1 (itrJ'. (ill:: •%ro invirc to :tt'.:t i,%l L;Jik i1::a:f ing and L:i{pres!i their ojuj-]Dori:, jfor C): i l�ll1'L 1il'1' 1 J11 111':II.J L 1 Uit I...1 Liv U1.+L:.1 1 nl:Ll t L%,i:t I.J...' L: I ( ' 4 Dopar L111oitL. �71. A,Lu1,11U111 No (7t.•1 ) !,.1 -`_i lJi,'l'lat t :,,1:, - .ti...•�-};� t1,t� C)T —�:.:}s.t....+lw�....�•--. _�..�..: _.. C:7'1'1' i'1:1:tlt l I:i, C:(�:•,:•:t :.,:.�11�:: r OWN LA 41 CITY Or HUNTINGTON NNACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION IK11IWA M w4cm To Charles W. Thompson �,� James W. Palin, Director City Administrator � Development Services Subject EQUESTRIAN STAGING AREas, Date December 15, 1982 STATEMENT OF ISSUE: In response to a request bCity Council (special study session of December 6, 1902) staff has further explored the opportunities for equestrian staging areas within the City. i The Orange County Board of Supervisors approved along with the adoption of the Orange County Master Plan of Riding and Hiking Trails two poten- tial staging areas within the City . The two locations identified include one in the future Bolsa Chica Linear Regional Park and the other along the Santa Ana River Trail near Brookhtirst Street. Although the county I has suggested thase locations, a number of other possihilities exist. f The following are the county criteria for staging areas: St3gi.ng Areas: a. ;itaging areas may vary in size depending on location, physical constraints, and need. b. Where feasible, staging arean should be located within regional or state parks or be adjacent to arterial highways. c. Surfacing with well-drained, non-cohesive coils is desirable, where feasible. d. Staging areas should have the following provided: 1) I:dentification signs. 2) Harked parking stalls long enough for a car and horse trailer and laid out eo that striaght-ahead entrance and exit are possible. 3) Waiter for horse+, where feasible. 4) Water for riders ;end hikers, where feasible . 5) Hitching posts. 6) Picnic tables. 7) Rest rooms, where Zeasible. 8) Shade. Development of equestrian staging areas can be accomplished with funding from the county's Harbors, Beaches, and Parks Conunission. Funds for trail development or related improvements are Allocated on a priority t of"'1 Eque;strian Staging AL-as December 15, 1982 Page 2 basis 'ram, projects identified in the county's five-year Trail Imple- mentation Plan (approximately six already identified projects will receive funding in fiscal year 183) . The county office of Open Space Recreation Programs is presently devel- oping a new five-year Implementation Plan. Deciding which projects are to be included in thin document along with the development of an Expenditure Plan (which actually prioritizes projects for funding on a yearly basis) in presently being conducted with the assistance of the O::ange County Horseman' s Associatlon. 'These recommendations will be presented to the Board of Supervisors in early 1983. In order for the City to participate in this process, the various staging opportunities in Huntington Beach need to be analyzed with the recommendation for one selected site being forwarders to the county for Consideration and possible inclusion in the next Expenditure Plan. The funds available in any given year Are not great and the number of pro- jects is not highs therefore, staff feels that if the City can demonstrate a need chances for funding appear good. Note: Only one site neede to be selected, due to the fact that an additional site will be included in the Man-ter Plan For Dolsa Chica Linear Regional Park. ATTACHED 1 . Potential Staging Area Site Descriptions 2. Maps of Possible Staging Area Locations JWP:MA:df POTENTIAL STAGING AREA SITE DESCRIPTIONS 1. Location: Garfield at the Santa Ana River Land Use Designation: Public, Quasi-Public, Institutional %oning Designation: R1 Property Owner: Southern California Edison/City of fluntingtun Beach Comments: The site is between the Ellin substation rnd the sanitation facilities. No adjacent residential. 2. Location: Adams at the Santa Ana River Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential zoning Designation: Rl Property Owner: Southern California Edison/City of Huntington ©each Comments: The area is designated as the Talbert Water District reservoir. Residential uses are Im- mediately adjacent. Access to the site is through the residential uses. 3. Location: Lebard Park (Indianapolis at the Santa Ana Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential Zoning Designation: CF-R and Rl Property Owner: Southern California Edison/City of Huntington Beach Comments: Residential uses are immediately adjacent and the site is difficult to locate. 4. Location: Atlanta at the Santa hna River Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential Zoning Designation: RA-0 and R1 Property Owner: Southern California Edison/City of Huntington -" Beach Comments: The site is adjacent to residential uses other possible locations exist adjacent to the Orange County Floud Control District channel; for example, Magnolia Street (City-owned) and Newland Street. However, the selection of one of these locations may be predeterm- ining the precise alignment of the cross-city linking trail between the future facilities in both Bolsa Chica Linear Regional Park and Huntington Central Park with the Santa Ana River Trail and the remainder of the Orange County trail system. r A arl. , tail IN ra � ra u r IY n IN ALP 1' IN IN IV r lid • 1 3-�� IY IY IY ' 1 a • � r IN I1/ . IV IY a- IN i 1 ` IN { 3-3a .. IY IN IY IY f % IN -- w �w-r r I'•"-�"' ILI -fit Iv IN 1 s; f6�iritYt 61'�1 ""� IY � � t >y 1l11 a 1I! t, IY }f { t/_�. wt Y.r;r MI,Mfr111 IN • Id ( / 7Ar allllyq - 1- /SN 11•I•t 'A li'M•M'M•K/•N'rll',YAI•gi`Mt'M/'61/lot Ifrrl�wnrYrrr,l.r rrr.�, Pd iro ii•i�i 1110 7MDI L• On"& V r+ram r+rlw• ! /� �r V r� t i �t /`� r� I�,/� �t t�/''� p ulms+r/rWAG �� ►wp,f N•i•ta VIN1 U.1 I•1 I ,I +Lt tl.1�I Il0J d✓L� Q V Ire-wrwa.-,vw■ ) /M /t•L•/ /11■/trl■SPIR"r.lar/ MI,/„104 a a" tH•/ TT■�r■+77``■■ •�{1�,,/')T ■■/'•��■ T �y11• .air r-IMU I- r, ..•i I Y Wf �I�J.i ,rw I-040 arw r" Uti r•/ N N ♦1 rau■ rlrl nlr ttL h•Lan ,rnM ff.w.n-n.l BE 1N 7f•M-f fiH r>«»f 7 rN 1•,...•.w MI y16 101 A ■! 71�r'N!t Alb do A�ID rWM MI .• flf�1 M.M.N r r,-,/ ra IrY wN r„r Ylr MI'/1Mf-r //IA/► Ip/w■■wrr ,ti :ILON /� W r.- { 1-9-C� � dV T 1J (M1Sla 1`dN011D9S 0(VINOZ � �fMAr�ld `Id t PLANNIM ZONING pm a SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 8-6-10 -- CITY �I . to halt- r.,■:K .." rr,Mw ;� ,. v. t I:•N elf t0■■Ii■r ■Mow moot f•■.•• rT� rr1 I�1,1t�b�HUNTINGTON BEACH f IOM r•>• tm■r'•rr■yN■ti■•IM1i,�ot�►r •1�if IfN loss u1• ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA $WIN lrIN MILM M W ZONE CAW ■s,1rt•r,M1,M1,41.1••I.N•t.,It+C•N•7r,rr w "—""�'t' Z. + fit ! RI RI / RI : I } C14 . R I •• ` 4 1 4 RI 1 • ' NM • 1• ' RI hi At RI L .. R1All F-7 ' L Ir 1 RI NI RI !11 f Al to I 11w1+f� r r Al CF"ECF- • R I ,,.,�.tt• .,y, i11 low RI RI +t RI ' RI j RI �, RI � RI No •1 I no t all 1 �r ATLANTA AVE — r • W4i y i• I A • . r 'PLANNING ZON114G DM 19 SECTIONAL. DISTRICT MAP 17-6-10 hol[ wcrr/f lulll/tCITY OF Is eee ..1.� �............... y,MI• ...11S I.IN I.•r. r/rr caurcl► fro•.•a yr of l[C[hp "Ifto 0 t►a r0 •W I a 010.0 �IUNTINGTON I3 '�CTI 1'.6.11 „° �_ ••.•/. 10/f (/ II.Mrrr M.r 11 h1U•1 J r ro r1 ntf . 1!1 ew•r.�,/ ••wrr ru«•r !•tj.•�ilr�1 wra NMf••/frNrlel MIANGEA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ' 1•r••r IUr MoglaD In ZONE CASE flr.M.NJ!,w•Ir,w•ro.fr•I.fr•e..r•IRI•ti.rfu,lrr,. f.,.0 1..1 e.r•Ir r•N t.el.lr ►curd r r •r •.. 1.•af Tr �� IIIMr 1.r Aft rr 'A f'► � co� YNJ RA-0 r � 49 •I , I � 1 1 �_� i r✓ / li I/: f JL .--1 F o w•>• ;r' � 1 G1�. it l•�ll • y.jn� All 1 I �• CITY err■ HLMTINOTM ACM c(% INTER-DEPARTMENT' COMMUNICATION ►aa)V 4rt*w rcH To Charles W. Thompson ijVn .lames W. Palin, Director City Administrator p Development Services Subject EQUESTRIAN TRAIL STUDY Date November 23, 1982 SESSION ,,�,►��! /`�e���G� ()-A 12-122- The Orange County Board of Supervisors at its regular meeting of Septem- ber. 1, 1982, approved the Master Plan of Riding and hiking Trails. The plan consists of 45 individual trails comprising a 330 mile system. One of the individual trails identified is a Huntington Reach Trail which will connect the ,Santa Ana River Trail to future equestrian facilities in the Dolma Chica Linear Regional Park and Huntington Central Park. The following is the description of the Huntington Beach Trail from the Orange County Master Plan of Riding and Hiking Trails: 'The Huntington Beach Trail commences at the southerly and of the Santa Ana River Trail and extends northwesterly along the bank of the Talbert Channel to Brookhurst Street. from Brookhurst Street the trail extends along the southerly and westerly side of the channel to the abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way. The trail then extends northerly through the exieting developed area along the railroad right-of-way to Garfield ?Avenue. Aftor crossing Garfield Avenue And Main Street, the trail extends along the westerly side of Gothard Street to Ellis Avenue and then westerly along the southerly side of Ellis Avenue to the proposed Bolsa Chica Linear Regional Park, Within the linear regional park the trail extends along the bluff to a point near Pacific Coast Highway and may includean extended trail loop within the park to enhance trail use " . In addition, two potential staging areas in Huntington Beach have been identified for possible inclusion in the sytem. One of the locations is within the future Bolsa Chica Linear Regional Park, the other is loc- ated along the Huntington Beach Trail in the vicinity of Brookhurst Street. These locations havj been selected for further study and do not reflect the only possibilitiPR within the City. The Master Plan of Riding and Hiking Trails was prepared by the Project Planning Division of the Orange County Environ,-nental Management Agency with the assistnnee of the Master Plan of Riding and Hiking Trails Ad- visory Committee. The Advisory Committee was comprised of three repre- sentatives from each supervi.sorial district, appointed by each supervisor. The representatives from the Second District were Connie Mandic, Phyllis Traylor, and Bob Mattox. Mik-n Adams of our Advance Planning Division, occassionally monitored the committee's meetings on behalf of the City of Huntington Beach. I 1 t •� 00 Equestrian Trail Stua, Session November 23, 1982 Page 2 The committee's draft Masher Plan of Riding and Hiking Trails showed no trail through the City , although the committee had discussed the possibility of connecting the Santa Ana River Trail with the future Bolsa China Linear Regional Park. The District Two representatives on the committee as well as others in the community expressed to the City their opposition to the omission of this cross-City link in the County's trails syutem. The City Council responding to the concerns raised and after a brief review of the draft document at the May 17, 1902 meeting, passed a motion "requesting thn t a link be shown on the County' s Master Plan of Riding and hiking Trails connecting the Bolsa Chica Linear Regional Park Trail and Huntington Central Park Trails with the Santa Ana River Trail and the rest of the County grail system". The Department of [levelopment Services did not: have an opportunity to prepare a General Flan conformance on the proposal. prior 14--o City Council actions however, the draft Master Plan included no new trails within the City at that time. Following Council action, staff prepared a map showing all flood channels, utility easements and right-of-way corridors in order for the committee to select alternative routes which could achieve the cross-City linkage. In addition, staff has met with the committee and vrith the County staff reviewing route options (including the Wintersburg Channel, Talbert; Avenue, the Edison easements, Garfield Avenue, Adams Avenue, the Pacific Electric right-of-way, the Talbert Channel and various combinations of streets and right-of-ways) . These meetings did not conclusively deter- mine one recommended routa; County staff made that recommendation after a number of field inspections. The committee concurred with the County staff recommendation and it was included in the Master Plan of Riding and Hiking Trails adopted by the County Board of Supervisors on Sep- tember 1, 1982. Local planning agency review was not requested prior to Board action. The County staff stated that an opportunity for Local findings of consistency would occur after the Master Plan was adopted. The major intent of: the County action is to provide a connecting link within the City between the two regional facilities. The City may re- evaluate the proposed route and may recommend additional options for consideration; the County staff has indicated that they are certainly willing to work with the City in the development of a trail link through the City which i.; acceptable to all concerned. � Attached: 1. A copy of the orange County Master Plan o1: Riding and Hiking Trails 2. A copy of the City's Trails Implementation Plan 3. A copy of the City's Equestrian use Study 4. A copy of the City Council 's May 17, 1982 minutes 5. A copy of the City Council letter to Supervisor Wieder (May 14t 1982) JWP:MA:df ra.rr U n � IFOP ^� Ilpurll I. M:�lulc,Jr., lJ 1•� � \ �► 1 �.� � a ■ l•\ �.i l�a If! / MnY(SN PRO TEMPOHI' Do,, MAcAl,llrr 1 �1 `�� (1,"C1.eSCSrC^19ti �• 2dU01•lAlll ifliCl,� _--• -^ CAI.I/'Uiflllfl92040 COU/ICILIALMUCNS Ilaln SI1/II,/ ►� . rlulll liM11 • J.c► KF1111 Ilun P4111111Ui1 • Sphn 7ho��+» May 14 , 10t12 1 Sul)e1'vi:;c)r Ilarric,t:l: I•�i.c:dcr, .?nd Ilit.Lric-L Ha] 1 of lldminisL-ration 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana , CA. 92701 Dear Harriett : The City of Huntington Beach ha:; received and revs.owecl the County's 1.1asLvr Plan of iliditin and Ilihirtlj The City, recc)ctni 7i.ny that Lhe Smi I.,I Ana Iti voi, '1'ra i 1 is thebackbone of the entire Comity L•r, sysLem, is; very concerned tha L the: link conner.L•i nil the pi:olln:;ud Bo L,;1 Chica Linear ltecliona.l. Park ti-ail and Lho IIu;-L•inlltori Central 1'r,rl: trails. with Lhe banl•ri Ana Itivor Trail han been omitted . The hrafl 1.1a:;Lor Plan of itidin,l and Ilil: in(l Trai I :. (k'lin- 011L•ed a link utilir.inU LhC S1,1ut:11 r•n califurid'a right-of-way wost from Lho SanL•a Ami River t1 ,I lioinL eonnectincj wit:lt Talhc!rL Ave , ► nd continuing an::,t Lo j Huntington Central Park . Thin racy nol: be t1tc: iwa,;L desirable .11ignmunt: ror the lint: inct Li-ail- thraticlh lAw City, however it does, shm., an i n t:l_'n I: nn Ow part of both Lho City and CounLy as t l) t:ht' d(.':Siral)i l i Ly of l establishing a crass c.iLy connucti-on . The City would like to aid Liic COMILy SUI f in l:ur::uir;y additional opticiris for a comwc;Li nil Lra it Lhroijoh Lhe city. Once: if location can lie: both the Cite Vinci Cuun ty cmi l d L•hcn i nc l udi., thi.:; trail .i n Lho i r resper.t; v1, 1;1:Cr(�a t i on 1:I anent.:: . 1 n t.ho nu,,mL i rl•. L:h(t City E;Lronyly 1:.00ls; that: a 1 i I11: nocrl:: Lt7 l)(•' Fll(!::'!1 ('J; the CaenLy ' s 1•i,istar Plan of I: i(1in(i ,ut(i 11i.kin(l Trai 1 connectitirl thu. llol:'a Chic."i Lilwar Itc:ctilrna) Pall. I.r,li. 1 �_1111cl ilun L.i nclLtln Cinit:ra l l`,]ri; I' rrI i I :, ii i Lh l h1.' s:;►iI I';i !•n,i Idve1 Trai 1 :roil the 1. of t !11' ComiLy i'va i I SincCr1'ly, 19 RobcrL 11. Mandic: ,Jr . 4 Mayor R1'i•S:I•ln :bas I kiln nAP CITY OF M UNTINGTON BEACH lM�rwr,ro►Nrn i` ; , MAYOR'S MEMO, , . • 1. TO The Honorable City Council FROM Bob Mandic, Mayor EUEJECT EQUESTRIAN TRAILS - ORANGE COUNTY DAYS May 17 , 1962 MASTER PLAN OF RIDING & HIKING TRAILS I believe it is imperative For the City to take a position opposing the deletion of the link connecting the proposed Bolsa Chica Linear Regional Park -trail and the Huntington Central Park trails with the Santa Ana ,River Trail. 1 strongly recommend that Council approve sending the attached letter to' Orange County Supervisor Harriett Wieser and Bob Fischer of the Environmental Management Agency. • �� f i BM:ja ` I rV i . I I 1 MAYOR ` IIo1011 P.M81141111 Jr. I City of Fl untingto*n Beach MAYOR PRO TWOIIC Don M11A111111► P. D.max 190 • 1000 MAIN STREET • CALIFORNIA 911440 COUNCILIIIEII/Llli Muth G.011151 llulh F1A1e1 J•tk Kelly llon►•Ill"lea Jelin 1hem11 May 1-9, 1982 Supervisor Ilarrieet Wieder, 2nd District Hall of Administration 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA. 92701 r7ear Harriett: The City of .11untington Beach has recetved and reviewed the County' s Master Plan of Riding and Iliking Trails. The City, recognizing that the Santa Ana River Trail is the backbone of the entire County trail system,is very concerned that the link connecting the proposed Bolsa Chica Linear Regicnal Park trail and the Huntington Central Park trails with the Santa Ana River Trail has been omitted. The Draft Master Plan of Riding and Hiking Trails delin- eated a link utilizing the Southern California Edison right-of-way west from the Santa Ana River to a point connecting with Talbert, Ave. and continuing west to Huntington Central Park. This may not be the most ' desirable alignment for the linking trail through the City, however it does show an intent on the part of both the City and County as to the desirability of establishing a croon city connection. The City would like to aid the County staff in pursuing additional options for a connecting trail through tha city. Once a location can be determined, both the city and County could then include this new trail in their respective Recreation Elements. In the meantime the City strongly feels that a link needs to be shown on the County's Master Plan of Riding and Iliking 'trails connecting the Bolsa Chica Linear Regional Park trail and Huntington Central Park trails with the Santa Ana River Trail and the rest• of the County trail system. Sincerely, Robert P. Mandic Jr. Mayor RPM:MA:bas lb _ r- .3,00 REOUES . FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION I* Date August 21p 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council submitted by: Charles W. Thompaon, City Adminis tra 1 ft ,od by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Work$W �--- "I*": Bicycle Trail Budget Statement of luue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: e adopted budget did not reflect the correct amount or grant funds allocated to the City for bicyclr, trails. One project, the Gothardi'Warner/ Ellis trail, was improperly underfunded. RECOtMENDATIONt ppropr ate $5,106.35 from the Other Grant Fund tc restore the project to the proper funding level. ANALYsrst When te 1901-82 budget was prepared, an error was made in calculating the bike trails project list. The Gothard/Warner/Ellis trail (account 893616) was underfunded. A reappropriation of $5,106. 35 from the Grant: Unappro- priated Fund is necessary to correct this deficiency and complete the project, FUNDING SOURCEt to to Grant: Funds. AP'I'KoVED t1y f;i'��y COUNCIL ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS% Not aFpilcasle. ATTACHKENTS t , F.Z.R. Q.r1,� K CWT:PEC:JS:jy IOO 4/81 4 . . ' r*s lP"N 41TV OF MU"T1_____M ■McACN INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Charles W. Thompson From F. 8. Arguallo City Administrator Chief of Administrative Services Subject Revision To bicycle Trail Budget To date August 28, 1981 Restore The Gothard/Warner/Ellis Project To The Proper Funding Level FiR M 81-6 In response to the Public Works Department, I am hereby submitting a Financial Impact Report pertinant to the request for increased funding to accurately depict the correct appropriation necessary to finance this program for FY1981-82. it has been recommended that a reappropriation in the amount of $5,106.35 would be sufficient for this purpose. Sufficient monies are available in the Other Grant Fund for such pursuits. An affirma- tive response by the City Council will increase the appropriation in Account 0893616 by $5,106,35 and reduce the balance in the Other Grant Fund to $45,254.30 - the latter of which has not been adjusted for final closing FYi980-81 entries. 4 F. D. Arguello Chief of Administrative Services FBA/AR/cg f CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAD-- FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT Project Name BBleycla Trail Budget Description Revision to Bicycle Trail budget to restore the Gothard/Warner/Ellis _project to the Proper funding level ._ 1. DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 .1 One-T1ms Costs Land Furn. aV Acquisition Construction tie: E ui�r ant Other Total Cost 5,106.35 50106.35 1 .2 Recurring Annual Costs Addis t one ;ter a s Outside Pgyfgll Personnel SM2011es. Services Rey-y-wSs T. 1 Co ..0_ 1 .3 Replacement/Renewal Costs N/A i 2. INDIRECT COSTS N/A 1 I Floanc.la I Impact Report • '�,, . Page 2 ?. MON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A k. DENEFITS TO SE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT This expenditure Is nacesrflrq if the pr2ject in cue tion is,to be XISA e: present approved funding limits do not allow for the lmploamentatlan of any meaningful program. PROJECT USAGE Dail - - b. EXPENDITURE TIMING Subject to City Council approval. 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT See. Comment A. CITY 9W HUNTINt'iION MACH CA 75-27 f•I'LIJ COUNCIL • ADM;NISTRATOR COMMUNICATION M�irw, rrwwn To Honorable Mayor and From City Administrator City Council Members ;'ubject STATUS REPORT OF TLC Date April 4, 1975 (TRANSPORTATION-LUNCH- COUNSELING) PROJECT At the March 17, 1975 City Council meeting, Resolution Number 4048 was presented to the City Council requesting an expenditure of a maximum of $6,000.00 from the Civic Improvement Fund for the renovation of the old fire station in the former Civic Center com- plex for the purposes of making this facility available to the TLC Program for Senior Citizens. The City Council continued action on this resolution and instructed the City Administrator to explore the availability of other facilities for the TLC Project and report back to the City Council. In par- ticular, the Council directed the City Administrator to explore the possible use of the Southern California Edison Compan building on Main Street. As a result, 1 have been in contact with Mr. Bill Compton of the Southern California Edison Company. Mr. Compton has been unsble to locate the building Flans for this facility not has he been able to ascertain a reasonable rental value since this property has not been appraised in quite a while. Mr. Compton has Indicated that as soon as fie is able to locate these plans, he will make them available to the City in order for the staff to determine the renovation costs involved to make this facility available not only to the TLC group but other possible agencies. As a result, I as not able to present the Council with a recommendation regarding this facility at this point in time. As an interim measure, the City Council authorized a payment of utility bills for TLC at its present location in the amount of $75.00 for the month of March. A possible suggestion would be to authorize the continual payment of these utility bills on a monthly basis until such time as the City staff has been able to obtain the Edison Company building plans and ascertain estimates of renovation costs to provide this facility to the TLC. Respectfully submitted, 42:000 + . ar'" David D. Rowlands City Administrator DDR:dp