Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCirculation Element Amendment 83-1 - Environmental Impact Re RO ' INTER•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION rr*v To Charles W. Thompson r O James 11. Palin, Director City Administrator ~D Development Services Subject CIRCULATION ELEMENT �cto November 30, 1983 � - AMENDMENT NO. 83-1 Attached for distribution to 'the City Council i5 a summary sheet detail- ing the individual Circulation Element Amendment requests and the Planning staff's and Planning Commission' '.: recommendations for Uach. Circulation Element Amendment No. .3-1 is Agenda Item D--la.•on the December •0", 1983 City Council meeting agenda. JIIP:IIS:df Attachment 'r •��� �b o��?;j,o � J � d�"X��4GC�, D 1983 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL OFFICE :� �,,ry, �s� •» t. :��r •:.s`Ie j��,�#�!'�'t '".°�'��F a�`.,�i'C�*���r(;" .."'��•'.a''C'"• f�', •1����,'�^d�a5!'`3'r• 7 :,R. 's SUMMARY OF REQUESTS -- C1R 33-1 .. y R"_,UE.ST I=- V STAFF PLANNING COMMISSIW IIPZA OF CO':CEMI AFPLICAIrr EMUEST FECOMMENMTION RECOWIMWATION x, 2.1 City Staff Realign Ellis Avenue Realign Ellis Avenue Same-but: direct staff west of Goldenwest wez%; of Goldenwest to redesignate Ellis _ Street to connect with Street to connect with Avenue east of Beach Talbert Avenue at Taltirt Avenue at Boulevard and west of vdwards Street. Ldwards Street, Edwards Street from i I secondary to-primer} arterial on the n=t amendment. i.2 City Staff Rc-Cv11uR[C the aiignnent Retain the alignment Same. of GotharG acreet with of Gothird Street with Crystal Street to connect Crystal Street to can- with Main Street in the sect with Main Street a •ricirity of Clay Avenue. in the vicinity of Clay Avenue. 2.3 Mansion Properties/ Redesignate Paler Avenue Retain the pris airy Same.. ' City Staff between Seaview and Golden- arterial designations on west Streuts, and beaviCM Palsy Avenue and Seavie:w Street between Garfield Street. Delete the prim- Avenue and Pacific Coast ary stub between Pales Highway from primary to Avenue and Pacific Coast secondary arterials. De- Highway. s lete the primary stub be- tween Pals Avenue and Pacific Coast highway. 2.4 City `OtLIcil Evaluate the deletion of Retain Indianapolis: Ave- Same-but direct staff Indiarsapolis Avenue between nue as a secondary ar- to bring the item IXke Street and Beach terial betwe_n Lake back for reconsider- Boulevard. Street and Beach (joule- ation in conjunction' •r vard. with .the pending Dounitown Circulation Amendment. 2.5 City Staff Redesignate Pacific Coast Redesignate Pacific Same. Highway between Goldenwast Coast Highway between ~* Street and the Santa Ann Goldenwast Street and River from prir..ary to major' the Santa Ana River from arterial. primary to major arterial. SUMMARY OF REQUESTS -- CIR 83-I Page Two { a . REQUEST ITEM/ STAFF PLANNING CO[OM OW I AREA. 10F COtMEN APPLICANT PE EST- RECDMMENDATION RECUMENDATION' 2.6 City Staff Miscellaneous Items as in- Approve Miscellanefleis Same. ' dicated on page 3 of the Items as indicated on Request for Council Action.' nags 3 of the Request !or Council Action. yet f - G.. _ • RE '�-. _ x -- October 27, 1983 _ DateTV CLEUX �j Submitted to: Hongralile" y Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrate pre reel b James W. Palin, Director of Development Sarvices r'i pa Y Subject: CIRCULATION ELEMENT 'AMENDMENT NO. 83•-1/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 83•-1 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternativa Actiori,Attachments-W� STATEMENT OF ISSUE: 1 Circulation. Element Amendment No. 83-1 addresses a number of proposed dhainges.-to the Circulation of Arterial Street a and Highways as requested jointly by the Departments of Public Wcrks and Development Services. The amendment consists of recommended deletions and re- alignments of arterials, changas in arterial designations and miscel- laneous street name changes. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The 'Planning Cormission recommended cartification of Environmental. Impact Report No. 83-1 to the City Council by the following vote: ON. MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY ERSKINE: AYES: Higgins, Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Erskine, Schumacher, Mir j ahangir NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The Planning Commission took separate straw votes on each request item. These votes, a]ong with any discussion, are included in the attached draft minutes from the Planning Commission's September 20, 1983 meeting. The Planning Commission approved Resolution rlo. 1310 recommending City Council adoption of Circulation Element. Amendment No. 83-1 b; the following vote: ON MOTION BY MIRJAHANGIR AND SECOND BY LIVENGOOD: AYES: Higgins, Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Erskine, Schumacher, Mir jahangir NOES: None APPROVED BY CITY M ABSENT: Notre -f1 ABSTAIN: None r -I " QTY C1.KklC -44 PIO 4/81 d� CEA 83--1/EIR 83-1 Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ."61i In addition to the Planning Commission's recommendation to adopt Resolution 532tj, the Planning Commission also recommends that the City council direct staff to 'Ao the following: 1. Indianapolis Ave - Remain as ;is and. reevaluate in conjunction with the future Downtown Area Circulation. Element-Amendnent. s 2. Upgrade Ellis Avenue from a secondary to a primary arterial east of Beach Boulevard and west of Edwards £treet 'on the next Ciz ,,ulation Element Amendment. STAFF 'RECOMMEND,ATION: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.��at Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution P'3w. Staff also concurs with the Planning Commission's recommended fellow-up I: actions. ANALYSIS: The amendment requests are analyzed in detail in the Circulation Ele- ment Amendment Report No. 83-1 forwarded with this request for Council Action. The amendment requests and recommended actions are summarized ' as follows: 2.1 Realign Ellis Avenue to connect to Talbert Avenue at Edwards Street. Planning Commission and staff recommend this realignment. . 2.2 Re-evaluate the alignment of Gothard Street with Crystal' Street to connect with Main Street in the vicinity of Clay Avenue, Planning Commission and staff recommend that the Gothard-Crystal alignment be retained as presently depicted o theCirculation g p y p n h Plan, with the tie-in to Main Street in the vicinity of Clay Avenue to be precise planned at a later date. ,A 2.3 Redesignate Palm Avenue between Seaview and Goldenwest Streets, and Seaview Street between Garfield Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway from primary to secondary arterials. Delete the primary stub between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. Planning Commission and staff recommend retaining the primary desigpations oi, Palm and Seaview, and deleting the stub arterial. 2.4 Evaluate Indianapolis Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boule-.. vard. Planning Commission and staff recommend that Indianapolis Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard be retained as a secondary arterial on the Circulation Plan. 2.5 Redesignate Pacific Coast Highway between Goldenwest Street and the Santa Ana River from primary to majc:, arterial. Planning Commission and staff recommend the redesignation. I CEA 83-1/EIR 83-1 Page 3 2.6 Miscellaneous Items: 1. Change Argosy Drive to Argosy Avenue. 2. Change Lake Street between Beach Boulevard and Garfield Avenue to Main Street. 3. Change Gothard Street: between Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway to Seventeenth Street. 4. Ifthe Ellis-Talbert alignm3nt is selected for CIR 83-1 Area .2.11 change Talbert Avenue were of Edwards Street to Ellis Avenue. 5. Ak the name Center Avenue to the. secondary arterial north of Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and Beach Boulevard. 4 ' 6. Indicate- the Orange Avenue realignment with Atlanta Avenue with a dashed line. 7. Indicate -the connection of Delaware Street to Atlanta Avenue with a solid line. Be Indicate the connection of Yorktown Avenue at Lake Street with a solid line. 9. Indicate the connection of Ellis Avenue between Gothard Street and the Pacific Electric right-of-wale with a solid line. 10. Indicate the Connection of Saybrook Lane to Edinger Avenue with a solid line. I 11. Indicate Springdale Street south of Talbert Avenue with a solid line. 12. Delete the extension of Palm Avenue from Seaview Street: into the Bolsa Chica. 1 ^ t J These changes will bring the Circulation Element into conformity with existing conditions. Planning Commission and staff recommend approval. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Environmental documentation for Circulation Element Amendment No. 83-1 may be found in the amendment repoi '• which also serves as EIR 83-1. EIR 83-1 was posted for a 45-day review period which ended o i July 23, 1983. Public comments and staff responses are incorporated in the appendix of the report. rpy v-rri t} t R; f • CEA 83-1/EIR 83-1 Page 4 ALTHRNATIVES: The City Council may adopt the requested, ch3nges as recommended, modify they► as desired, or retain the existing alignments and/or designations in the Circulation Element. ATTACMENTS: 1. Resolucion for City Council adoption No.53 a q (Staff and Planning Commission recommendation.) 2. Minutes from Planning Commission meeting of 9/20/83.. 3, Circulation Element Amendment No. 83-1 and Environmental Impact Report No. 83-1. alp:HS:sr i I �_ . DRAr t' CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT No. 83-1/ENVIRp27MEtJTAL IMPACT' RE!'ORT _ M NO. 83-1 (Continued from 9-7--83) Initiatedy Cif of Huntington Beach Staff recommends the following: 1. Realignment of Ellis Avenue to connect with Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest and Edwards r_-treats (2.1) . 2. Re-evaluation of the alignment of Got;iard Street with Crystal StrE:et to connect with Main Street in the vicinity of Clay Avenue (2.2) . 3. Redesignation of Palm Avenue between Seaview and Goldenwest Streets, and Seaview Street between Garfield and Par_-ific Coast Highway from primary to secondary arterials. DelPcion of the primary stub between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coat Highway (2.3) . 4. Evaluation of the deletion of Indianapolis Avenue between Lake Street and Beach boulevard (3.4) , and 5. Redesignation of Pacific Coast Highway between Goldenwest Street and the Santa Ana River from primary to major (2.5) . HAL Simmons made the staff presentation. Commissioner Schumacher �nqulred about plans relating to 5-points shopping center. Mr. Simmons stated that they were only conceptual plans at this point. She also asked for a historical sketch of plans with Edwards at the top of the bluff giving public access to the park. Secretary Palin stated that many issues and goals were involved, that originally the City Council adopted a resolution to mintmixe road crossing in the park, possibly one where Edwards would tie in with Seaview. is a .steep hill, that the He aleo said that, Edwards it cuts into a m;ddenhat the One on Ellis have not been established and improve traffic and safety. goal was to eliminate the hill to extension as not Y Ile also said that the proposed park Y got incorporated into Central park, that that will depend on acquisition of the mushroom farm land. Ccmmissioner Schumacher was concerned about the extension of Do Tsaia.ic . Chuck Clark said that the plan makes provision for that regardless of w happens. Edwards in depicted hat as a rimer arterial. p cted as going west and connecting with Seaview f primary She wondered if that was within any of the wetlands area. Mr. Palin said the more sensitive areas were closer to the ocean. Further discussion took place regarding horse crossings. The public hearing was opened. Richard Moore directed his comments Section 2.4, deletion of Indianapolis. Ile said he did not feel thatto the City will get the dedication of land it needs to accomplish their i planes. He also com;zAnted on the traffic, counts in the EIR. The public hearing was closed. Commiusion discussion took place on 2.1. Commissioner Hinchell arcked If the new street was designated secondary. Mr. SiltsmOss said it would t i -2_ 9-20-83 - P.C. i i t ' 1 I DRAuFT I be Seaview primary to Garfield and secondary north of Garfield.�, She asked was the intent to 'get from the ocean (PCH) to the Gan Diego. I Freeway. Mr. Simmons said that east--west access was at issue, that Edwards may have to be upgraded to primary. Commissioner Livengood c-.iamentu", on the EIR. He wonder ad..whether it, would be a good .idea to incorporate comments from the County from their letter of July 14, 19B3, regarding effects on .:llis. Chuck,•Clrrk stated that because of traffic volumes east of that area, the possj-. bil{ty of upgrading Ellis is under consideration, however,. this would have to go back through :the amendment process. Commissioner Erskine said he would support such a motion. Disscussion. resumed between Commissioner Schumacher and Mr. Simmons regarding her suggestion . mitigating- further dividing of the park by streets. Secretary Palin stated that with the curve data that one would need for an artorial highway, you could not come in and create curves, it would be physi- cally impossible. ON, MOTION BY. LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY EFtSKINE SECTION 2.1 WAS APPROVED AS. RECOMMENDED. BY STAFF AND REQUEST AREA EAST OF:BEACH BOULEVARD TO BE DESIGNATED AS PRIMARY, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW VOTE: ` AYESs Higgins, Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Erskine, I �. Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT$ None ABSTAIN: None ON POTION BY LIVEN300D AND SECOND BY HIGGINS SECTION 2.2 WAS APPROVED � AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF TO RETAIN THE GOTHARD-CRYSTAL ALIGNMENT, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW VOTES t i• "•AYES$ Higgira, Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Erskine, r. _tcher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENTs None ABSTAINS None ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR SECTION 2.3 WAS APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFP, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Erskine, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None AB,SEN1,s None ABSTAIN: None Discuosien ensued on Section 2.4 with Commissioner Livengood recalling that in discussing the Downtown Specific Plan that there was a recommendation to retain Indianapolis as a secondary arterial. } .. Commissioner Schumacher stated that at the time Commission voted on the ! ' Specific Plan she voted against it and she :could vote against it s ' again. She felt that other alternatives were available without ill -3- 9--20-83 - P.C. j I . I i I I I I Eon ff impacting residential areas. she said that the Bolsa Chica "ex' te ion would to totally through wetlands and could not go along with staff. ON MOTION BY bIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY:HIGGINS IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT. ., INDIANAPOLIS BETWEEN;�LAKE AND BEACH BE'RETAINED. AS A SECONDARY ARTERIAL AND .THAT IT BE REVIEWED AGAIN AT, THE TIME OF THE CIRCULATION ON THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW VOTE: AYES: Higcjins, Winchall, Livengood, Porter, Erskine, ' Mirjahangir NOES: ., Schumacher ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: ?lone Regarding Section 2.5, Commissioner Livengood su discuss3ion in the text from a letter received fromeCalTranssted �uding more ON MOTION BY.,LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY HIGGINS SECTION 2.5, WAS APPROVED M .1 •WITH "ADDED PARAGRAPH RESPONDING TO CAL TRANS LETTER SHOWING DOLLAR AMOUNT, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Winchall, Livengood, Porter, Erskine, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: None += ABSTAINt None ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY ERSKINE SECTION 2.6, MISCELLAIIEOUS, WAS APPROVED 'AS WRITTEN, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW VOTE: AYES: Higgina, Winchall, Livengood, Schumacher, Mirjahangir g d, Porten, Lrsakine, NOES: None ABSENT: Nona 'ABSTAIN: None `ON MOTION PY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY ERSKINE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 83-1 WAS APPROVED AS AMENDED ;U,D RECOMMENDED TO THE. CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE$ r AYESs Higgins, Winchall, Livengood, Porter, Erskine, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None r ON MOTION BY MIRJAHANGIR AND SECOND BY LIVENGOOD CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 83-1 WAS APPROVED AS AMENDED AND RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: RESOLUTION NO. 1310 WAS APPROVED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: tf 1 f� -a- 9-20.-83 , i .._...�...,.,eue�,mc�ara+e�.Er+tucasr�iax,wrwaarar...Ana,arsR:rtL�Y✓�Etit7fJ "Ia�.4w�A _ .. . . _ .'�$3nr: Yu`—��� '��s`�{"��"`.��� BRA AYESs Higgins, Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Erskine, i Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES:, None ABSENT: None , ABSTAIN: None '. A.MOTION,,WAS .MADE BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY ERSKINE STAFF WAS, DIRECTED .TO REnESIGNATE ELLIS EAST OF BEACH AS H PRIMARY STREET THE NEXT TIME A j CIRCULATION ELEMENT IS CONSIDERED. Chairman. Porter suggested further thut' staff review alignment of Ellis west of the 2.1 alignment over to extension of Bolca Chica, Road. The maker of the motion agreed with the amendments vote as -follows: AYESs Higgins, Wincholl, Livengood, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: Erskine ABSENT: None 3 ABSTAIN: None i r { •, t f Y t'I { I I -5-- 9--20-83 -. P.C. � 4 1 i i I . I ` r CI TV OF HdJ NTINGTON BEACH COUNCII. . ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION 83"64 EKnti,rtrr91401 To Honorable Mayor and From Charles, Thompson, City Council Members City Administrator Subject DOWNTOWN CIRCULATION Date October 71 1983 ALTERNATIVES Attached is a report which we have prepared to hopefully clarify that adequate capacity exists within our circulation system to support the proposed development within the Downtown `Y Area. The report also demonstrates that there are many .alternatives to effectively integrate the local street. system with the �r major facilities designed to serve this important area of the City. Respecfully submitted, Charles W. Thompson I City Administrator CWT:TT:Ip �1 I e t . 3 R. I ri i D011NT HN CIRCULATION PLAN AI,TC I YE STRATEG ES A Report to the City it Counc . �October 6, 1983 f ; f i r. r i DOWNTOWN CIRCULATION PLAN .-ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES I. INTR06k ION Several questions have been raised during the study' sessions and public hearings _concerning transportation and circulation issues related to the Downtown Specific Plan. In this report, I have attempted to respond to some of the questions raised and, hopefully, address the .subject in its proper context. In that regard, it is important to note that the geographic area involved in the Specific Plan, within which development is likely to occur in excess of development standards which currently exist and were previously planned for, is NONE. The overall circulation plan which has evolved over the years has been developed in response to the need to provide access to the beach for over 10 million visitors annually, and at the same time, effectively serve one of the nation's fastest growing communities. The estimated street and highway trips which will' be generated by the antics- ! pat.d development within the Specific Plan Area will be substantially less ' under the curr�.nt zoning. Thirty percent of these that which. could occur u trips are likely to be generated by residential household; built at densi- ties and at a scale and scope which will be very compatible with the sur- in residential neighborhoods. Less than 30% of the overall rounding existing Specific Plan Area will, at sometime in the future, be developed to sup- A l port and attract additional visitors to the area. This area is delineated on the following map of the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways. • 1 x..v...n•.t.+..ssty.YLS:K':7�FrZiC'y�x�:t•�.1.ii!��.�' -+.v�r r8:t,'. ...itA1.1.'S-,..••:Lt':A"' ,' t 1• r ti t i Z +,, ."'iL `yFi •ry`+ 1. '7c 'k !'p t t •�,� �+ E .i�;. '3Y.. ��;h. (' � "� � i� �, �� a `t,•#�, ?,*1 �t .p fr 1 {ti MON J ' .....«.r..��-= _.». Sc..as.�:s.^... .. ..:7r,t:1 •:-t---!• :�,�.•�..,...,,t.,,..st •ucsriw[rlrs CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL ww •.• STREETS AND HIGHWAYS '1 1 ADOPTED DY OTY C V;X I RESMUTION NO 43M-DEC 12.1976 LEGF•JD • r,,.;,;,,, FREEWAY STREET UiiOMY FT MAJOR 4wDO0 PRIMARY 3QOD4 .. i. SEcoNoAnY 20ow .._ . - .... NOTE' % .�:*._. 04t 0 tests t•ucuc rt'srwc 1 Vr a wr •' �t.[ttSSttlt K'�at► ►fir Or wtr , (A5K0 Lest•wotart tKtt �MtK •o t,G,, a was a.•rs • rt wNw 46 i %• � *lop 4b I - I ) ....imp. F CITY OF �y HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNtA •�. i' r. EXISTING CIRCULATION PLAN .�. .-- Figure 1•-1 M ... .....••«•:rw.�:ra'+s+a..ies,-•r^........:s:.:M•we.,...r•.,.....�._._.,.--,,.......•••v++a,:��.�-.. -..... ,i:.'S,ft:�>=.r•76!terstfawM".•�•�a .. '.4• .. �r :i As you can see from reviewing the map, the area is comprised primarily of the visitor-serving commercial frontage along Pacific Coast Highway, extending from 6th Street to Beach Boulevard, It will be this area, and this area only, that will possibly generate a re,ional draw which will ; result in vehicular trips which exceed a normal, multi-family, residential ' neighborhood or a small neighborhood commercial center which will'make up the balance of the planning area. Evta if a significant traffic demand 4 here to occur from development within this visitor serving commercial :. ' strip, the peak-hour traffic flow generated by the hotel/motel, restaurant and commercial facilities, will in all likelihood, be different than that of the beachgoer from which, at certain times, traffic conflict and con- gestion comes. I It is obvious from reviewing the attached map that the primary facilities which will serve this commercial strip, the beach, and the 'pier will be Pacific Coast Highway, Beach Boulevard and the other major arterials such as Goidenwest, Magnolia, Brookhurst, etc. Little additional demand will ' be placed ca the adjacent local streets to accommodate the visitor destined for this Commercial area. In fact, the plan proposes to minimize the impact of traffic generated by even the new residential development upon the surrounding neighborhoods through proper planning and design. For example, by constructing the Walnut extension from Lake to Beach, . approximately *60% of all the new residential development within the Specific plan Area will have direct access to Beach Boulevard and other points east. In addition, at least another 25% of the new residential ., I -3- �.�rr•'..4'.'°-c��i:X,i.r..-.«...�.....��..._.__.�.�.......»_........__ ,..............,..w.-w:.s.........,+..,,.+..z.a.rrn...w...+.,.....Lr.ca-..t'1',.'t',:.Fk•::.njLi.z..ri..wx.Y«'va+v...w. , .1 ;1 7�j �.--.fit_ � '..1� .i* :`� V :",• lop 0, L.r Lei Lam}F ; r.J ice:�. •.)`: �. \�� ^ Q. r i s •3riUr Mr-I 711 L.LL E, ,{ ; 1#giLL p RRRPRRPRRHqpElt 35 0 O� �7 Q i CITY OF HtJMGTON f i NOTE. 721C P.�i'n,4RY /�c��;%✓S All, 7WC-' AP6r Tac✓N � ' �i Eft � �opgy rDEivCt/�7- units will be served directly by Pacific roast Highway and thus have limited impact on adjoining residential streets. Likewise, through the appropriate design of several of the most important in within the Specific plan Area, residential and non-residential traffic can be diverted , to the major north-south and east-west arterials in direct and expeditous ways to protect the Townlot and other residential neighborhoods • and still effectively serve the traf fic needs of the area. I1. ALTERNATIVE CIRCULpTIOU PLANS As can be ascertained from the previous discussion and from the review of the Greer & Company report and previous staff presentations on the sub- ject, the level of proposed development within the guidelines proposed by the Planning Commission and as recommended for amendment by the staff, can be adequately served with relatively minor improvements to the existing street and highway system. For instance, -the Greer b Company found through its assessment that the basic existing street, system' and presently -planned improvements, such as the proposed revisions along the Pacific Coast Highway and the extension of Walnut Street to a connection with Beach Boulevard, should be adequate for the foreseeable future." This appears to be a reasonable conclusion when one recognizes the fact that the major portion of the Downtown Specific Area must be served directly by pacific Coast Highway and its link to such north-south streets as Goldenwest and Beach Boulevard. With the improvements noted above, S _S- y�ifaLii.'�"`""'""••.•,...............»-....._.._. �r-....+-�+�..•««+�.....��..�._...�...._-•�---••.-•.w«......r...... ..•Kyrixa:.�IX.�is7 lux-!m..arJ.raw.r�►.a+M.ww+�.�r.s.y } ' 1 ` there will be no, need to rely upon any significant improvements to such ti -.f• interior streets as Orange and Main to support the area. TFis fact is 'f made clear on Page 39 of the Downtown Specific Plan which states: "Main Street should continue inland from the Downtown care as a local street with one lane of travel in each direction". The Specific Plan on Page 39 •C [ further states that ". the continuation of Orange Avenue into the ,z Townlot Area should remain as only one lane in each direction". The map on the following page depicts the primary existing'routes to Down- town and the beach. As can be seen from reviewing the map, Beach 6oule- vard,. Goldenwest Street, Pacific Coast Highway, and Main Street serve an important role in meeting existing traffic needs. These streets, with the exception of Main Street, will continue to provide the primary access routes to and from the Downtown. They will, however, be complemented by the construction of the ifalnut extension and some proposed changes in the secondary and local street configuration to encourage and provide more direct and convenient access to the aia3or carriers and discourage trips into and through the surrounding residential neighborhoods. i, As has previously been discussed, there are numerous alternatives for accomplishing this goal. Several potential alternatives are attached, for your review. Each of these alternatives reflects the basic "backbone" system which is depicted on the following map. Through proper design, landscaping treatment, signing and other amentities, it is felt that this basic system can expedite visitor flow into and out of the area and 1 throughpX.2p er "linkage" with the adjoining local streets, insure minimum intrusion into the surrounding residential neighborhoods. •` ',rA'.Sii�R'rLC.+C(:f.as(.rwvrn*N.+.•a.'e•.+1.e.«•..«.s�++..+.s.�: �.. .G- . - ��`r„•'•'";^':.,J[I.wr.«S1�:iaiMK!}IL�iR'�wdtTi.l..ryw.yr.,✓r ��p gv It-, y X :qit 'Zj 4A si _.lL.._J ED Li O___ D ll it L ;IUUL l ff- vj .wk Ikjt 3 vW � tio - 117" t .•�-W.i.,�.e.M4•+ -..r......::.:r....-�.- _:��. ... . ... — ... �_� ..t ... •a-n-..:s4:.:.l:a:it..t•stts:+rA�r•151,'.«�^d..IM�J��il� �I •'"•��.t3a:lur..w...+..» a.�+.•+.w+.+.•...ti+.v.+�w:..rr:.:.J.Yi.i�:io.�'?"'1-1:::.`E.:..�' • A LT E R N A-r t v - A TTN—loTN CONNECTION L•,rm4F--0RgNGE REALKWMI T _ ♦ ��+� 'Sri .• 1 17! ; �, 1`� �� r rr �4... �r +✓3) '..4r 6b/ /w►• It MI VI .Ip bow.. '�' � •iyl.• •."�� its ral+ .�j IM j yy.i. � .•I V ��Y• ✓$j it C �' I Litt I�( S�r �• PbA AIM& (� � .. .� I�.iLt:dwh"!';''i;-,'r'Y�T'.Z.�t�.,ri•+C:1'•'.�'i;: f;'•,;,:•. :+E. `aei'l�{` `x t �' ;I l `{+ � /r"I ��a1Mt v• y, nr• �41 it I; 1.• � :. � �r 1�?.ai � WI•il v. y I�w i.1«+ 1.+w. t, i I HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA Ownerships PLANNING DIVISION 1 +. w��•w.�� w a IsrL.Y.• '+.�.•/rr'�"•'yY"Mr,1 Y.•r •wN•r*1M••r.•w•r.w.••.r..►Mr.rw�........r......,, ` ...._.�....... .. „, .i. ....-J.%'r.xGi.,r:aiu►i.:,atl+»..w�+...++wi11 i 1 ) { `' AL rErzMA`1VE • ��r (nnAiAa- 6-rm CoAl ECTiviv) !� 1s well' • , 44l N rr w• A fr too zz I.I.- "_' f � •f��l �: �j, .L f�: is•r : ♦b .••f t� i' /..L � A+l.. -y r•ar. IT �4 ,w .r�•�5,� E �ii ,..• L!!4� [� �{7 1-fit• f ..,.� W of 1 HUNTINGTON BEA0-1 CALIFORNIA PLANNING DIVISION Ownerships 77 �r a4 N•M la,:d....,.._._- -.. wf w•�!M•.J•f P:�'�•,+�:7"' w..:.�s'.c7i...,. r.,�..ry/�+ .r•...+r. .1 F No TERNATIVE A—Z t ei. AL *TN IPMANA M-1,S CowNEGT'1011 r'lAw--Lfike CoNiviscT ioN L 1 forLot nl . 10 {It '� • /f cos wPw \.. •I 6w {•. /...� nT= z. J,{!_ �,1 I.I �~+ ♦' ♦ 1, ♦d I•a: n• .fit.h.., ,ivy. .4 ':� '.'Y�:: ;1 �`i4�.6.; L4},�± b.r:`:•♦'"r: Awe !`"� �I. p,. I�•t ,1+:►� '.• I L�••t 1.+•1 07-t aww+;,;�•r;ri: .t;:.':it`d;' ,� +,,• •3'' J.r';�''+� a.+;w ,x � Hai h 1✓ly � ••t•• �+• •a+ �•y. �r + ks Tt+A Ali f.r • tt I�yl, I { 1 • 1�w Yp. { YT f p HUNIINGTON BEACH C4LIFORNIN C?WCl@rships PLANNING DIVISION 0-4 SO �'ClC1.Lt;-.7:,�'[ihl, ..;rr,..�..+....u... .._,.__..... ... .._. . ....�.�....,�.. .... . ... . .. ,. . ..,r..♦ ... ... .... .�..:u,.. r`isr-i, r r L'TE RNATIVE MAIN 57o`THROV To RC.H, ` . ,• LAkF-- ORANGE RC-ALIGNmCWT • =Y i• N � cps .- •�, AwJ 44 :;: 'y .ter. �� 4 •"/ a..tiT, lar1. ammum"MUM 16-1 LA ,.c "" „»:, ;.,: a ,•�_ mow. rt { '':., ..t,.�:IW�1'. Sri.•i�L-;.a?$T;+'z.���••.Yf,`.�'.F1' �%1•• •.I! :.+.4irls-'' �.. HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA 0wherships PIANNING DIVISION -to ...•.;n1'.•'.'. i,...::r.'.;,' ziw.• ,....,.-.__ •" ..r.�.T._' ';�:,�.'..�",r� r. :1 .. ...,..__.. i�'y:ii'= :.'r`—'�'tl+�vq.`w�~.�iri.+~:'�i"i�" `f,1n.>iµ�-3•M. .1'a. r:d c':. .. ..... .. ...Y.(...4'ir+i lY:.�•1. o. i•3 (.a:. r va oil let A LTERN AT I VE G MAIN 5T. THROVGH Tv RCA ATLAN-M-ORANGE CoNN. r I► nJ � r •a ON .r 00 • �MJ �r rr � � r' IT— AM e. +..�Jwy;{•jCwy-�i1.. a'.�.�:ti1A"Yi.tl�•�. ,..�• ::uf..:�{�,.-:/ '�.�• ':;+-,".:4 y,•. � "�','C ... ".'.L' :'`.Y.� �.�yy�+� :)3 ..,•yy arr ra. f�.fT '.. . �IRj "r• 1���. %'7 �'~ �t.. �... 'tip A.r r) ,W.., t; it �: ,� •�.�.. � � i."(,,� tom. _...-. i•.r:• "�3 � �� t• N.af. ' �� YI)'t •Z (I!. ? •.✓ it `t�►Ttyi, 4.. ,/�.F� 7•t"�" '1" 'f'�"' ;f.�j,'}','t .4`.. "'q'... r-. ^/t.wri.t'•T» '}*tY,iK+M1't`iNi'"Y,`S'+i�',`!'T.'y.+yt s •�. .•+��.s.• i - .�.....,ag.sxl��;,«ti a�N�'%'a!k.tltcfci*�arFieix't.,f.�•l!ti:�i• ���;����LL��,: �, ,.j"•4 �'�iWlfil►i�C'.tsrT ! 1iUNTWGTON'8FACN C4LIFORNM Ow" n e r s r1 i p s PLANNING DIVISION „�..-.7x'''�.•:+'•,�""�'.+�rfYiit�QZt��..�ry.r...M`�•�iei�'lti�'+i'�•4%. _• •+--.. :.....,� - �.� "'• .. ._— .......�. _. �....«. .... .« i �,�?' ,7.r1. Sw...►. .a, . _ .. ........:, il:.•u 1,' .. :fi:...ti'-�.f.i:SlsA.^'�••'-"^�, 1 , •r. r ( r.r ri1' 1M s JA'r • 4 N r� i 1 rt 4, v, � � i + { •,�+ia � � p: � 7 1 + �..w�,r �t"Fr"r J r. *ti i + } �'� s + V. } r�r .�,,,, , ♦• � 1. ...r ti.�' r r` - i }. t •. r ittaa `�ry►:f M ♦ 7 Irk' a , � ` �1 r"4. y— 1� tili. 1 r rt ,.�[ �J •li��., ?•, r �.,.t ' M' , aZ � ., M1�` Y .,� Its � ♦ tSa ', Al t1 a (• 7t l� a '# t '{r -x,i4{� t �� ,';eta " r, � D ? ti rt.}�;+ j�S''����i r' tit �� ! i:;+'; ,{ �, ,ti s+y..,R„ a'`1� � :Nty a �>�• �, 3; ,ear `^ . 4 "•rn�r n 4 74sr,� �.1 ! t 1 r � ':. : .{.� ? '+;QQ�ya`1�±Y�:'�rl a •to r�`� ttl��ya !ci` k�S' , �,+ { } '31 �. �, ?t � ��,,r�,Y 1'� ,n. t R R . � �:', st1AN ,,. f i i i }�, MS S �• ,`� .�4 >' 1 i\a r l ♦ S `�'* �k � 9.b f � � t $� � •Q. L F WMI ,a a +• '�������h !'}�b,")�F(� ;`•+i,,. .,: 'rTiX�.i � f �3��'��• .�.�` .:t�» rd�r'7� i1 7Ff S� •� 1� � a' {ii M., I .. yt 1? "j'ih � 1, ta.;..a+, �at• 1 f�r`r ! .y� 4 .. I �a� Cr � * i:�,.nrQ'1~�.. � �tid�. '[L� .� .+���� A� . +i. aS � �t �. r j�kir��� S�'iS,�_. �i# ... r�L' .&19 i {+, 1 " IHTtLt; J .Superior Court bl'AMOF,CAL' fxOfiN1A In end for thr County of orange u CYTY. OF.flu NTINGTON BEACNr CITY Ct:ERHearing 83-1 t 4afCal,tornsi ,� q),}��' f►tya '1:•# ,. .. ,,. � +, ,' r'.fi?��? 'k county ofo Iea. ��r*�• t i rj14' �:YJ +' 1r}: -.t om.'. ... °!�1 1+ br[l r.,( , s a.�. 1: ���,�• '�* t'+ }^' �`7 t � :•4 �����` �j !�•.•1$a�B'R+iYf;kiF. �Y•r. Nita J. ichter.. b That I am WA at all t{mes hettin then t, �! •bwii inns U:,it,}d Stairs over theoft boned tras u ci izen of t"•° �c,^�i waDaye}cpeK ;1� ay ottJ aot b Itatrty to nor �e aenty.one years,and that lntrresttd it;the a fx „ ad '"t, 1 +slltiiop tint I ar the p ntet btwa entitled matter �•cirte pal clerk of the pttnttr of the ��;:ta«.tt,r K�, �*•���`'t'r'' n ' +Y;s`, t'3 ' t + . ° � ' H +,:f7+;T i j� 7f !j t, ism UNT VN`i.1�+�/�i ma�.yy. p�y�.[�,� +. i.�^ 7�f�'r+T-df«M, ^'YV .yw fy'Z N ""J i4• �'(ti�tirl M• . .t � Glib K/• Rt~NI1zt ` r�" I� �}�»�'.liti•. Jf�-i..tk t►tKiWAcrui jtneraltirculat U!)I h �. .r�..�.�, t r i,i1i�•u� ♦i•' 'ZS ry'r `* '�' ir.^c.S! ., (;� i+' , is ti•a + 4 r }� s' �� F s, rt, .' «i. td in the Clty of �MINTXh'Gj ON BE4CN' j .Ft` a * �r f J ,''�'7 �� ,. s• } A ; ,, °':i »i •� d io re asd whir�rcutAfy.gtt4lt 6f h r•!wx rc 4tmina r iateal news and Inteitt Ix publt d for the i •,^ �3� i>i� ,zqt, �+-r 'tl `.f't, , ter,and which#It%'e $trace of a xcncral ch J JC• r'} "x x3 *r "{x• ,'r� ?: _ ; `' "` r + ` r lit+y� Wptr at all tlm r j°r '.,*E rr t., k k,',l Pt• Arid�ti1111=a bona t,desr A&a "lrwdn Mentioned had } i• n�' 1s i L" ',�• • !t,tt;` � -fit !fit t � t +^ and' pa{ser hr tt •option list of Paying subscriben4, Y' rt.r` ra 1;`n'4Z s 1.' r u*�' r . � ,�• v. A ., r« ti t;a r� ii fi , ; d r 4, '� > at tratntru tntery bet estaLIIshed,pr{ntrd and pub `Y;:.;.. "fit{�+r . .�,:. ;:; ' y ,� ( � .•r . :t ZA; ah in the midCount P +F ",+ ., � ?t my Jf t^;r. J fps• l , ts. eutsd q y of Uraz a SJ t Pa d � E . �' �cs iwnotd tAII na ice• that the null E fora . F t •r n� r.t rIn }tie! S ' f 1 ;D{ ( r & g ", t' a .• } t'F „ + K Q tlrl {j n t�s [+f W n t}st ' .r.,tt .t i, k, T � air•-.,• ,�t�. j.J sdikg"' t,'t�' a�U, t �J; >: ..a i a'Fir. ea bee published 1 � >, �,•�. .r r,. t,• r; �i... r � 8(� �} CZtNiaitwoteeidntvs anp 1,4 n the rctrular } * 1. tC !� •(, , '+ i?..� h1 �a4'�.t%.� . �'� r f 1 L�},- 11 ;, V f► the fo ps► d t in an au yy �s r u ItdateR town: h0 y pjtitmtnt •i ``r! -, r! lj7J,3r. ,, ` i 'iii �'� �i�"'t."'1�:/� � ,A 1„'�' �• )//' ,,7�H t f�7 �• � tr i �, ;FS: y, Y)y. ,t,{1}3}rr}J }.�� , }�44' �,�` � f+Q�•i.+, r� ;l r�Y` Ph �I!� 1 •% �t .�{. i� e•� •1-": •J liji ts� *t h i �j�y .1�! r .r +.�i" y� 1rY {'�}aY„t e�?• •� Y� �f i7t4 1 5 'r� Ct�YY�r f r f 1993 d" f �Lf71+,7f 71'' S�'j ftt{j�`.. i .i: :1•a«t�L� jir '1�'t 1 �iyr7 "�; .; !i' r• h ' :fit r '3 nwJrr 3 5 ;zi+ +{c ' r , ,`�a y L� r ;W < + � r-c`�t}� ', .'�'' .1 'r !f.•,i awr L, k 's. �,� r u (� V. r �{ r, r "ia}•�,}t,��{ ��'�it4�',. �t. 4.�* 1'{r�"ti�,,s� }�?lyJy i.�.}` ��.t`i rl�'`t � '�. �y y. r°,! ' '�y'ri.ir .4'`��1`��y1��'' (�`,,�A�v',i�±{'.�: :��=:+;�Y r +- ! r ,' rr �t •�.F'�4 +' •y}i t 2 rt' S •i � � J '/.�. I'y f5 � r .��� S'•�`�• tr T '� ;, ..d1 � �4�yy)),{.F' }csttitjr(et d«larej ttad llttnatt t t" tl,'tr+fit t D� •'�t' 1lttttaatid Yofperfurythatt J•, * t �2'"i! # 'ii'iraTt:ifa t� Y k'� ceneetr ho fn ,:�.'.�.. r� •{. y ., rr"i,�f �.? •r`� a rh!O• :';+tl•t!;-t�„n.�•'w'+•F'� �r�y': � ti k•�i;,.•,•,,?�• ' �a•�J`;•���i!��k� t,+ a• r•a:•: t}� . !ahr y,,iK' t , {yrtt�:�. .yfk:�4r1:« i { Ya .�^tgi ►eyt+ t tedaty +a `i` tali £) + t, �t *n..,`.:' .•aa•••,a•a••.. ',:t � �•' >_•,,•ixy 1t r. ^• i Si;`. •y ,.. r ,r- wrl.Y i r +r j' ��.� 4.i �' ' 4 1 , .1 i • r t C• i•r t Q� ; S tt r "•' r r,f_ tlfUfnl�f,tltte J„ tOC'tob+i+r I i 1'4}" v�?'r !9 .+'yt rr• LC k,r R' ti}', kt 4 r hd.�o , 83.. r� '^ <x �<trr ,��� a,F' ,�f,:�F`�, 't'��ti,�•��• ��arlE. •� w � + 1r ti r � E +' � � t ' '+• 19• �"�,t¢�'•�5 ��,.,r, S�7r-, r r� : �3 �r �' %'• •'F;: fat t ''� l S ' , �t J ✓1' y s t;Y{y .j, ,} Y(�4,,: t� {a ,z .x �' ' � `• • �j y ��yy L•. �.Y'��"�,� .'lVjL ►�'►7 t�Y.ry}r Tl�';M1 > S/ �-�i"' �r r�• r", ,.•!, a .tb••.��•sir�1'•h if.,-p'lfii y�' r.,{p ,�, >t.t ,{y}�trrLr �}` .•,�A' ty jr �i .+✓i r 'IKV' Tf, ••fir, `p1:• .•• f• y�`1At V /�'i#,•�j 1P ilf 3�1.1.{`x'�:•��4p� !�,• '�.rM,X •�s r, i{ ��, 4 �� ` Sit'nattua .'}� ,fir• �j:.•{��•Y,* :• FL t �{(r; �,�: "f •'��'�� r `D � } r F ty •t A� � A t � )l,• r, s�F A+i,'�....}}'�,�,�{*•t�����»rM �•h`,�Nl�+i: f ,S?� Yt�,��''�l..t��tt3+M'+y�it`r f'{ r �,�,Y�j�¢���',� �F i r{ � t •���{�i- �� '���t`•` H#;'t,7-;'f�°{ r,t SF.STI. ^�?;3, f•� {wkrjyl + t }/.t�ty$t �a t r �' •r 1 I.!• �1�4�''-7-+`�, 'S .����" � 7 � �� `�,+�• 7.���L.,� :•.+, f3'�A�.)�(+ ,�Y,[�'�� ^'e k f: .. .• ' • l � kji 1 F ! . 7i rkt j--tf.yV, ( t?A%v. t •(µ+pi r t �`�y} r J`ar� i�d �'- `c {� 1,- •_. {t ,.t .. )�`'.�+r[I3.-:��t. �' f� �• �¢t ����,Rr(jj��'``����t1,�iK ( Y�\ r` y��k"�t, 1 Y '�'�'(-'yjj� � ��5'�� �'+ , ,�, �I { .. • R..,w�r7t`, 1 y .,r;1lr}s,,�tt;f �r,.fir r 4,., }'`•�` ..,i. f��f �r � y., ''".iI''�e +``,y .�R C' � ` �' `yr+s�.41i ��'t•}�'�; ���yj�j�<��1,5 i�c•',�'.���}���. �t„t,�,�� � � � .i tr•. .�"'. ,t�j:",�4• ���4p j��Y,���7:r�� b t"'y�r, ��1,3}:Y��h�k� t}`-Z. �•I "c�^tir' � 7� '1 ! �t 1! �' � „'.•q'r"'a*'x:•11:7d{,:^7:�:4•'s: ^„1 '�' � � y�''L, �fe .'x"'r � 4a.�#�j iw,M , h {+r"'t- 4�,�lt�r ,a ' •'�t�`., "* 4{ J,^�7,7 t.i l.r,.s.1 V."�4..;+Sr►4 riei ).t T"r.t{��t,.`'^� j� d;t•, yr, l+ti.'♦ 7 ){�v'`. _ i"' � �' � ,•!. -' y, �1?.i ll � t•.��-.+�ai� `t' \ 1 y rr�^'l1 Y • • . � �f • �,��3w ..11)S4i �l'����1>:l a�',I t+:�,i, ,>�°j�rtin'+�r` ^ft` rr ,� .t. .l '� M �}1 (r � ,. 'lla�,+ ,+i�LS��2'�.'� fii!, �.f, �+ j✓i;r•i' �v � � { _ rW��`�J7+ +�' �} "� �'t(k°,Tistr uZC.$7 4�i"jKr,"F � },r`t•i`�•''�"�(`"_+'7'.'�, t � V t'4+ I nil r.�N`t�:'� '.T'•`,b. "% ray •�`'"}�. :F=;i�:7ki1{"a'Cr'�� '' :; .�1�' d',T,{�''�i�¢t, i"•.f {rr)dj 'M1�'��7 :A'-f. '. fr"#''x.�3F r •1 t�.. t , r�♦� �yt �t'L•� � v�� 4. t, '•K. .' fy, fi•' r� ;(�c r.,.A`y ... +�►wh+rt a{'� �11r i' +i�� '1•, '•ft f tHA tr'S1 _•Y.+ s'.,r,,?r � ��, :,r4 '^yYr1��-S�' f{�•�.�;N� �l�,+��1kt 'rt.i,L' iw•+te .• � (�` �w��k,3,'�'.��'!k`•� Rfi y6 '�n1� ft z� ,1 F j� ;: „��4i tr'�^i.',r,�Y7ri+tr^.r+.,t.ar.!Za��",tf.'4��t arts I � i3 fit ~ k ti7�•• `7�y ,4 n t1� t]�{Y.1c , iTt ;„x� f � y )+ A. w., x; 't ;t.t y�' � •`i r 9 �C �/ •�'�t �• � 1 y •r � . 3 , MAW ". .�y,��r,•�'�r ', S �'h 3�ifs t + t+ ' tX �. •1 �. � (< !i ro�li °t 61 � t �"' t a r , (y� j j r 3 •'• r'at �• � t.'� �' �,r" �•{�1. St ,+ 'y•• �, � � 3 �� � it p <„ �� i t' r' �'�, ,�r � yr• � A L. t � a c 1"i ' 1 �'r G., ! � : v •�� + •A ' +"'� � r ;i� �r��� t��y',� Nit �}��, �, ;�,Y;•� �, ,s I �' ASS£ y, k t �• � �••.,i� 'tt f� ;r�j litr,! !�� t� k f�A;• �r, �r + s J iji .+ +•.� f id , 4 r �p ,'�f 3�'� `, �a #, L zjY# 1 �rx " Y:�,�i. 'rsT,.'Sir:+ r}5 +���� ���k!�fSf�l��hYi�.�rf �t!�7,5'_`�i'/7��.i, .�� r.tF �r.A�Tts�-.`1�.1j'✓�t.-� k L��A�4114/�i�r .1 a{ � 1* ��� ��` .� ��'#��� ' �j'i "?';��• jt�+�.''�� '_�,� �� t�.��'�4�� ���{g'��'�+� p���`�0.��,�k 7 f '"xv�:'i�i� '��'�4 �. , 't r� .� n .1, 't `+�'V. �+y ,+kt I .t�t X�1, t7.4/. �,1�;'�`##aj,,, • �x� '`i:�j ..i� {�r�'1�' A`.,+•� :i� �}'`M �� � fit.. ':� 5.5 � � t�: � 't,� i'�:r�i1 '� ¢r ��,�„ } }y{�+S �,.(`1,+,�y,�f{y`•j,'•{��t.: r'�F.'J • y ,� ((�'§�'• .f�� ,�1 .[ ASS p3 , �" � � {k., ,j#''�`y,. t*2'� .1, "?t�4�y�•7'Y '�3t!{S'+tyj+�i F 5�'�' t'�5./ �b�.' '°�'.j Na.• � , / ` Y Y+' t,#.A? ' "q # 5 ; T,,,i+.. �{ ..�:r. .r� .,};p 'w `ty� y `�,Y1��F'���. �\ �, .�}.. .t E:y, la i a,+i d n, t �it�yj( �1fi!i�Y.3!*•��e,y�S�.�'/1y+ �y�7y,'�+�¢(Y!.90Y,�,. ,��F�yI t.Xc`C�'��{1�a'���1"4(,'��rd�`�s�.�,���,•�/`�ry'�t{> i��t'.jj�;,Y}���i-�"t.i}�x:i�S �ri�iS�}r.IS, li ay A f}+r�:4.3�.{�#��i��?+.:►lf.di+1R"f'�.•,l.IL VIM, : n� d . j4r_',�',���i+�("��►,��Ap„��(cC�1 i�.�•..1 p1!,!.}f���•�f 1'�it�-{��".�{T�'S+'ri+�.*«zt r"tY'�'jk k S�.`�ti'��;.r.r�'t;l)1 1i'�x{?��, ;}�: '� ° di• ,l j �'r ri C'.t � ' F � ,rY .,, , •'� ) ? t. . a'` i+ �k4�4 A'jig' •, ;,tS,ri • �r ,t �"• s �+ •�� ( ,� j� F• 4r,., .t��� 3r sk�l�. ;� , }r� �,.;t, w�..,. �u^ +: •s r!"Y �•' .3 r. 'il,.:i �yk{ V1 fQ �: {•` Q1 �' Publ i sh /'D 7— .3 :::J ICE OF PUBLIC HEARING I CIRCULATION ELEMENT MIENDMENT NO. 83-1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Reach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Reach, at the hour of '7=30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on ManJk the 'lit, -day of &1ove*Ler- 1983. for the purpose of considering a proposed amendment to the Circulation Element cif the General Plan (CIR 83-1) , Environmental Impact Report 83-1 (EIR 83-1) which includes the following items: 1. Realignment of Ellis .Avenue to connect with Talbert Avenue between C,4;ldenwest and Edwards Streets. 2. Re-evaluation of the alignment of Gothard Streat with Crystal Street' to connect with Main .Street in the vicinity of Clay Avenue. 3. Redesignation of PaAm Avenue between Seaview and Goldenwest Streets, and Seaview Street between Garfield Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway frk... 3rimary to secondary arterials. Deletion of the primary stub between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coast- Highway. 4. Evaluation of the deletion of Indianapolis .Avenue between Lake Street and beach Boulevard. 5. Redesignat ion of Pacific Coast Highway between Goldenwest Street and the Santa Ana River from .primary to major. A copy of the proposed amendment to the Circulation Eletttent is on file in the Department of Mveloment.Ss'=vic cs. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said Circulation Element Amendment No, 83-1 and EIR 83-1 ' Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntin ton Beach. California. 92648 - 714 5 - 9 ( ) 36 5227 DATED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk , _.. . .. .. .. ,"{;,, ., .. :,:•. ,. :{.... .. r •,v°' .ttif.�fA,1'M va�Ltv`.Rf i 1 • i , f + S , + t S r i 7 , t � t �+�..K�;`/6 �y °'rf�c��'c" + 4�• � ' �[ +;i f^�'�'e. ��x�� � b •1 � �^. �+ t 'A i -y ' • r 9 1. � � F�.# � �. � �.: ;t �T' � � �• •4 ;� T ^x r ����� ��y'i� �.}` ...` 'r.��,}' _, �yf/ Yt�ft� sw, � y� `� ���; � {� 'f•,�t' � �1 �'� t�, � �h ya������ ° .)���, S�F fi�t�7� 'i��\�P�•4y � ";tr! rS�� �+ a� ` �.�!'��. re � + +1. A I��i�q�.` '��y.a' ,t _ r �; � ir, t s ri i }' '�J,S �»„ �,~••,. �/'N �k(� '{ .,� � .f `.�,.J'j D,�� � .t C �1��p.1 � .7 �' �Y' 'Y.�3 } { •`f. � � •�t }T i la�-fs'� ..`� 1{3 �'{ "r4�°r hf/'•.,}.��}'� �4+`�t, '1�.. i, fi •j r,�t4 /c• ,4`�t+� Y Y`t ��+��X� � :� � � x i F •a r• ,.��'•,,3pr t AM`P')„wTs CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL 7f -'` STREETS AND HIGHWAYS BY CITY N RESOLUTITONN 0 433QI.OEEC 2 f9?6 ��•�� *LEGEND; t FREEWAY STAhl CAPACITY MAJOR 45,000 PRAIARY 30JDOO SECONDARY 20000 1 -. . NOTE: �. SAID Lott Y[+Clft ti+if"PAO Of rM INN fDf fdCl iiMtf utTMYft I+tMT p ref Bran co far ItoTf 1 �w •,� 02.1 2.2 ,2.3 fie+ All \ 2 • ti1 i11 �'-'•� k ..St . 1 !r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH =- ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA r ' AMENDMENT REQUES' TS ':l r , r••. ;.1 y-rtwo�fac-s•11 n .:c.a:L-...,..�x::: ,:i..• I I' ♦ :ia•'F�'.j tT :+tr.i7•:.'Y_i,w......-.-.,.........-�.... ...r-:.,u•.- 5....,.,�'..�.a;�•'....rww.....,•.. .......-._..,.._......w•,a..r.-..a+.--.n....,.• . Y. s 1 r. r•� } 1 J{yY Ol; .i I{)}F l.. �k ��f ,*S �Y 1:� ,'�• 'jr (, 1 �J, '� • -4' I 4 t'r .�t �f ` Publish NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT `NO. 83-1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be field by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of '7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on _M_ JA the day of Nove.*Ler for the purpose of considerin; -a proposed amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan (CIR 83-1) , Environmental impact Report 83-1 (EIR 83-1) which includes the following items: . { 1. Realignment of Ellis Avenue to connect with Talbert Avenue between , Goldenwest and Edwards Streets. 2. Re-'evaluation' of the alignment of Gothard Street with. Crystal Street to connect with Main Street in the vicinity of Clay Avenue. 3. Redesignation of Palm Avenue between Seaview and.Goldenwest Streets, and Seaview Street between Garfield Avenue and Pacific Coast' llighway from primary to secondary arterials. Deletion of the primary stub. between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. i 4. Evaluation of the deletion of Indianapolis Avenue between take Street and teach Boulevard. 5. Redesignation of Pacific Coast Highway between Goldenwest street and the Santa Ana River From primary to major. A copy of the proposed amendment to the Circulation Elcwnt is on file in the Deparbirant of } Develomnnt.SCrvices. Ail interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their i i opinions for or against said Circulation Element Amendment No.�83-1 and EIR 83-1 � w Further information may be obtained frm the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED c CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk :.:Sl`I+• •.............�.........«—....•I.i.1I.'i:�t..'a..ltY:'.11f1.`^nq.ff+.r.lwLw.YMEM1awYY•a.....w..M..ww.ww�!F�1C i . i t � A r , ` �! f, •t H ti� �`!:r.s i ''�f �'F� 't ,, rt x � #'`R � Y •• 1 �'i`t t Y R CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL 1A — STREETS AND HIGHWAYS AD0P Or CITY Ca y RESOLUTION NO4XIS-DEC 213T6 'LEGEND- FREEWAY STFEr7 CAFWTY MAJOR 45A00 +r . .. _ ' t•, '""" PRIMARY 301cm f ' - SECONDARY ZQ= NOTE: t \ \ Wt KSI1StRt, Uliratsl A4041 OF +rat CASMO Lr[f MLti[ ARLAS 04R[ 40 Ffit 2.2 2.3 — 2' as �1joo 2. . • S -� \ . .. CITY OF . �-py\ 1 sy HUNTINGTON BEACH •'�, '�^-ORANGE COUNTY COUNTY CAUFDRNIA •�, r' f w .N� Y-h Nw Y•+• AMENDMENT REQUESTS ` I wi.74Z irrni:iw�;'�'f;; -j•^'. :.�•,.:i.:�:ti�s.�.u;, �r..1'.�vn,.... r..?.�,'•:. .r1•.. `:a;t��;.tom. ,., ... ..,,......«»,�.-•x.:.F,w.. .• ;stt'�:i3+»Sic+_t�:.':+::,+.zs-u�.as-,......'."`."....,..:., Y 4 , Y}' a t i ' � � � (fit fr � t• r 42 ' � .�4 :'� y �i t ,,¢¢,,,, 1 x,Sj • � xa f� Publ i sh le- -v- 7-S3 e` f NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Cw-,x4nov ElEmr-vT' hyEA,yhFv7 W. NOTICE IS HERE Y GIVEN that a public hearing will ►ie held y the City Council Of the City of HA ington Beach, in tree Council Chamber f the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at he hour of `7:30 P.M. , or/Ps soon thereafter as possible on MtM14 the 74L day f JkJaveMLer for the purpose of conside ing a proposed amendment to the Circulation Element of a General P an (CIr 83-1) , Environmental impact Report 83-1 '(EIR 83--1) whi h inc udes the following items: I. ReaJignment of Ellis Ave e o connect with Talbert Ave' nue- between Go.ldenwest and Edwards St ets. 2. Re--evaluation of the 'ali' a of Gothard Strcet with Crystal Street to connect with Main Stree in th vicinity of Clay Avenue. 3. Redesigriation of .Palm venue. bet en Seaview and Goldenwest Streets, and Seaview Street b ween Garfie Avenue ,and Pacific Coast Highway f rom',primary to sec dary arterial Deletion of the primary stub . between Palm Avenu and Pacific Coas Highway., l i( 4. Evaluation of th deletion of Indianap is Avenue between hake Street- and Beach Boulev rd. 5. Re' designation f Pacific Coast Highway be eon Goldenwest Street and . ,the Santa Ana . Aiver from primary to major. A copy of the prapo amerrlient to the Circulation Elemen is on file In the Department of Develowient. ►i - All interested ersons are invited to attend said hearing and exp ss their opinions for or against said n•i�.�w. x,s.'1 � � � 11Jw.8�-t w,,l �1 3-=t Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 00 Main r Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92646 - (714) 536-5227 DATED CITY OF HttNTINGTUN BEACH Iyr Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk ,'Ay`.Y`wqt'�•www":•ia.T.:i.�'.��'t:r-.�:;TS=k:a:.:j:fu:�.;«'lw.'i'Qls�ye,-,r`r....t cln.' ..n t.rN.w s,ra.....« ...,...w...a».Lw.....t\i:<a'-4.r.An.;.1.f'ti:w►V�4.?'Fw4Wl7Y1.1'C1.yW.•Yw'4FVMaw+a 4 ; 1 ti t t fy Y r, .� A�' ` fl , i t. d ' ''1 v t ,r t./ {s' 1. , )' ' i� } ''�'� tt+ 1 r ' ��•t��y �}� "V�l � �. , �; � ?��;� � ��' ��, � '•:; �,����� � � �t y�t4 �'� ,�'t'} r,, �` �!�' i � ,� �� .�!� "�{ � � 9 �, ti� �•,"� ti t;"'�ri �,V"r r � `+�,1 �r� �y{" .r � ��'�,"Alr i�` i. v ..� 9� +.R 2 3� t r'it � 4. � ��'. _t � �' � .� � � � •�ST f� � �,�jte' � �r 'l �S; r i i r OF NTINGTO '1 OFFICE ' . Y CLERK ti THE CIT CHI CALK 92&m ti y stti 1 CIRCULATIOrm ELEMENT t i1. AME& .� yT. 83ml yy� 1, [` APRIL e k' x' r. , En" "vironmentai I mpact Report , 83 . • • i i • r. diviMon rs; t: r; r" {C+ d{ { � . r. �•�• 't �' �}'ii tY. � �1. d � � F y� y .V i , G ,i S T�i , 'V, ., t ' r • d`, � Irk ( 1� 11 i Executive Summary Circulation Element Amendment 83.1 addresses five principle areas of concerns L Ellis Avenue between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets ' Z Gothard Street south of Ellis Avenue 3. Palm'Avenue between Goldenwest and SeavIaw Streets 4. Indianapolis Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard 5. Pacific Coast Highway south of Goldenwest Street ,j Ellis Avon Iiativeen'Edwards and Goldenwest Streete involves the 'connection of an ent.west arterial, either. Ellis Avenue or Talbert Avenue, from Golden lest Street _Mouo tentr�el ,Park ,to the Intersection,,of Talbert Avenue ',at Edwards Street. The CatAy has reclueeted,that the City provide such an east west arterial in order to'be ; consistent with the County. circulation plan., After .conBlderatlon of construction costa, emergency vehicle responso, disrLption of park activities and traffic projections, staff has recommended that Ellta Avenue rather than Talbert Avenue be connected as a primary aterlal from Goldenwest Street to the Intersection of Talbert Avenue and Edwards Street. Tie adcond area of.'concern.involves alternative alignments of Gothard`Street south of ElDu Avenue. Consideration was;'.given to elimination of the existing five-legged (ntemoction of Main/Gothard/Garfield, . ellmination of the undesirable "S" Curve configuratlon of •,the. exisUng Gothard alignment south of._Ellis Avenue, necessary ;49nalization of resulting now Internoctions and ,future :.lurid . use., patterns. Staff , rocnmmends that Gothard Street be align ed.with Crystal Street as currently shown on the , Circulation Man, with the tie-in to Main Street in the vicinity:of Clay.,Avenue .to be Precise planned at a later date. Staff further recommends'that Gotherd Street remaln as a secondary tsrterlal north of Garfield Avenue and as a primary arterial south of Garfield Avenue. 1`'{..,,��14,t�t���'r.« �iHc;w'.•yirrc,.; +ai.��i.:iai�:'si".:ii�l'.3(\,...L:•.rR.:.[. F.Cr.i':::i_::;::•.:3�'v`.;a:..:.,..tM4+e.. ..v,x..c:. ..:.t 4;:A..'.41A'.(S.'..�.T.YY�1lY)wf:.�!_':xt`•^C:�a' • x i The Palm Avenue Item Involves the proposed downgrading from primary to secondary of both Palm Avenue north of Goldenwest Street and SeavIew Street south of Gar'leld Avenue as well as deletion of the primary stub Between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway 'approximately halfway between SeavIew and Goldenwest Streets. Because of uncertainty about the Importance of SeavIew Street and Palm Avenue In relation to downtown development, staff recommends that these streets retain their primary arterial designations. Staff also recommends that the stub between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway be deleted. The Indianapolis Avenue item Involvea the possible deletion of that arterial between Beach Boulevard and Lake Street. Because of uncertainty about the ultimate nature of davelopmcnt'in the downtown area, there Is also uncertainty about the future importance of Indianapolis Avenue which has its western terminus In the vicinity of the northern downtown area. Staff therefore, recommends that Indianapolis Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Lake Street retain its secondary arterial designation and :tot be deleted M ' from the Circulation Plan. The'Pacific Coast Htghivay.Item Involvea upgrading of.the highway between Goldenwest Street and the Santa Ana River from'primary to major arterial.status. Thia redesignation w6uld bring the'City's*Circulation Plan into conformance with Caltrans' proposed widening project for Pacific Coast.Hlghway as well as the County's Circulation Plan. Staff has recomm^!ided that Paelfle Coast Highway be redesignated as proposed. f. t. t•, •.'ti'{l1AYdfiMfi7.:W.liY.1MF.Mw..+�.....-.�. .... .. _ ...-......�.....�.........�.�...-..w.a... .J.'Y.K.:C{ .1►I.'a..a .....�.i.......�a-..�........�...�.,rr+.+ ..r+........�+..+, ' r '^ i,.' .��a�!,SIt'?��{r �`�X., F � ,��( '� � •j�1 •*Y Y �` ,4 ��° �t' �� ,' `� j .t Y')� 0. � Ii •�. � �I�t�t �, (+� 1 ,f { r1 1�, 'x, tt e'� ' ,� 1 a' � t = r�y. ! , � j C ,.� *� ` �' �, •� ��,,�,. � T r� }r j '�. •ScF�1� 1 �'h1 � iX•+ 1�� v�* ���r\ `... �y��s°�.'.fir 14'3! 4 RA #V's + 1 { itS. 7 . .x.k f t l !•. r} 4►R$ 3 is •,, , h �a tTABLE OF • SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTkobb 1.1 Methodology Status1.2 Environmental 2.0 ANiENDMENT REQUESTS 2.1 Ellis Avenue Between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets i2.2 Gothard Street South . Ellis Avenue + Avenue between . . . Seaview Streets . 2.4 Indianapolis BetweenLakeStreetandBeachBoulevard 2.5 Pacific HighwaySouthI . . i Miscellaneous2-6 . .! 35 3.1 1 I' / sIMPACTS 3.1 Relationships Between Local Short-termof ErivIrohmentand thd'Maintenence and Enhancement of Long-term Productivity 3.2 Irreversible or • •f • 3.3 Growth'InducingImpacts40 APPENDIX EnvironmentalInitial EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES I� 71�t d: i r�. A+L �f,: t t i , w�• � 't +i. 't i; '1 'i? Y•' '�► tl i1 At'7 • �/ r' '+�• .:' t t � I ' 11t .} + ,1.�±'I I. . .y� +,�•�`4 4 t.��d. �� ' +'ii Tt 1 { .r 4: T , ., ' r . ,fit` .±• 1`, '.�Y. : r t` ti i. � K' L f}'* , �5 � 5 1 y .11, 4 "V� '' S i I•�i ," � .• c t I, ! 1- "+•��11 ��7��. � IY Z� Y�41 a aye^ �= v� ,.}� �i 1i`.�•,f .. { �� r+� .•i•11 ';tl ld'F t,;. �. .• �� t. 1t V^3t,�'r31,.�. .. ' Sr It y�'�!�t,• rhy.• ;.)d M•4 d1 Sx- { �* j �� t 4 ! �� ,i jt tr '.+ +1 +': I,f/�tyiC7.•� ; {,TF' . ". i` �. 1*L`� .i /,fy J." .^,..�,,i „'•, , il.} d �,' a�•i!i ;�� y '�:.{+ r .i 1�+1! l�iyli' ^i T �'i.. i '•:"! ff. 111 r I I„ 1 } �F S 4 q,X } ; t+\ j'. j 4 + 4."V . F°f I�l•�} r sX.► X� ! tt Klh rJ ,A t"S' �+/� a �. h S•�' , �'„ ,! 1�>>''/ t 4. ti, 3f" +'' i r,+",�t /t s + /tt liyi�' G r� 1 Sil 1f •b�'ll fie+{• +* t-'� !�: {ti , + i_'1 °i�`' �", � I i*� rt.R`(�'�y,. ,,� "?.4 t• 2 ' t rt: S.1t,#� 77`, lw '} 4, 3, i k.. $ ,' y}'+r' �S'..ltr }� dr , '�h 7r•t,A'} y \I R 0 y, a, pt1 ' ')!''+ia'I! } ,y. � 1 ► i> ; ti '/.et i�'� i. w ti< .}' � t , 4 1 x�.r yy ♦1!, �. +�., } 7 t ir�� '�� ► lk•�' , I 1 •/.. � �` �} + xi"�+ 1 t;e.'.. i'� 9Y,.� � �-',wit .;ry� d�•,Y' 4 �'� .�}• �:�„..�': �}efi`1 �� ±f�"•� �� 1�3�r r,l! >'a t Y�.•'; ,�S f •i� ,?+t , d+i t � h�Ss.y 1}� tiR ,t f r Yc, If•+3>�l,�N.< Xt14,% ♦ (F : >(1' 1 ,jixt L1 i t + •,{j, >}•' �♦ ; �7,� '71 �R;ti`1 y� �,,, t}i•�j'.t 1.+''x{�:a � 4�" 4 t ltl + } �y�wr �i`�.'1,'�+�t F',1 I!M lit{�4+}"�Tr��i�}1 �j�y 1.}4���] �. l��rY ..I♦1) ��' u{ stV/ w i �tf�. RI 1.,'.�'i t ,.P�c? +: rw 4ty{•. 'v` �,Lr � '':f-Y., r st� .��'f ti r .� ('} �� y` �" ,',� -t ,� ! ,�f 9�1 ,rt 7' tt4Ti1i ry M t 1. r3, .. { � t' � �� {yi �!�1+{• , t V ?" r,r •:r a � + 3 , .t. 't: ti' � ui r' 4 J3 �f', T# to 1. Vt t� �^ ��' .,� + � � ( I l �' .. "1� ► tj'l'�T .*,�r !r Al r, t1 �+'14 i rf � rl *S '� V jy1 !Y y'h.; • 1,�?1 } � `1� + t� ,� �1 4, ` '•} � �-'�! l -.�:" + r �'�I+{r4 i *a� ►�is ,i: ;I V r '' t rl l� 3�' � S .+.L1� �� � tit . litn 4 � �. 'i i�l' � �. tt �; !F� .'�{• c `iC+4 •r ~ { >ti' { .lei. A N i I 1.D INTRODUCTION i This. document; constitutes "an 'emendmen' t. to the Circulation.Element`bf, the Huntington Beach General Flan,and Is the flrst'amendment to this element•for 1983. The"Circulation Element..wasc adoptod as a mandated ''element :rof the General Plan'16'Dec6hiber,1976; this Is the third amendment to the Circulation ,} Element since, its original adoption. The adopted Circulation Plan of Arterlal Streets and Highways is presented In Figure 1-1. • s 1.1 Methodology This-report addressea.a number of proposed changea to the f irculatlon Plan of Artorial Streets and H(ghwaya as requested by the Departrriehts of Public Works and Development.Services... The,amendment' requests consist of deletions"and realignments of arterlals, changes in arterla! dosigna'tions and. miscellaneous atreet"name changes.;The propooed changes are analyzed 16 Sectlons,2 and 3 In terms of existing and proposed circulation patterns and traffic volumes, impact on existing and planned land uses, consistency with adopted City goals, policies ; and plain, and environmental Impacts. �( Ir,'.order to evaluate" arterial classifications needed to.serve the 'current end future traffic conditions, certain criteria and assumptions are made ragarding roadway capacities. •The concept. of capacity and the .relationship between i capacity and traffic volumes Is expressed by means of levels of,service, which Is a method developed by the County of Orange for tts Transportaton Elam nt to.the. General Plan.:,-Tho concept of levels of service recognizes that-,whilo f, there Is an absolute "limit to the amount of traffie.than can travel ttirnugh a given corridor, conditions rapidly doterlorate.as traffic reaches.that' level., As ' traffic approaches cnpaclty, congested conditions are experienced. There is genernl' Instability In the traffic flow, whereby small disruptions can cause considerable fluctuations In speeds and delays. t . y +..[',!R ••w.,...,...+•y•. ...�..�� •..� ;.Z:.i... v.y'r`. . •i.., .."t.i... .v:...I - .-.{.a•...�,... ,«.c........•....•... . .r.rva..� s..ns•v. .•,•rn....+wa✓.n 31 'A•'vay.��.. { SIS i C -- - --{em"M tc» � , r ;, }13tt { 4' >a.rvY* Y. L��y i+ .t t r i ' .T7,t e, >< l� • 105 1 r�1; •4. � �1• 1 1 .11•• i Sl . 't M r _ +� 1 h +.14:7 . r X•• An M •� C • h 'S '4 t fL r, t} 4 � r}A jk ' �'f � . .+'r++ I�;tti '� .'�"'4y <, . ,.,'� 5 �,'� .Y • r + .i , . ,a :w1�1)r , 'i; � ,. � ki � '}�. r � �# : .k! y, r�l:�it;3 �.,: t t :•i M. ..y,A t ' 'w�P t '� `,f� 7j� ,... i _,, ! Yt £•� 5 r +rY ° 1 ,, 7 1 f ' ?i , r N [ 7 YtJ��p r r '•.I,r t 1 � ,4// ?i, , � j 4 ,k r , 4 + +1 r }T��' J': F , Jt '1� 1{ 'hi! j +5 +��? # � i} ,�+` *�� y �- t 1 ' �{X � 7 '� S i`.1 r, l t+ .�I+`r��,�•• {^, 'S )F J ",j t r r � �{�1 1 i.,.. 4i�x-,'�;;.1 r��K f7 k+ ,x{ `f'� } = r-, t ' � V1.''t '�1 i�+j 'y , `4•'•t ,' �� t l.; 'r'�ti ( ' ' ,A `,� y'�#y- .'�.. �yt tyr wi f +} , l' r ' r�•r ,I ♦. ,/�t42 M + •"`��'� rit,'i � a. I' ,r. };'1 ai •.5 )• .r1'•r� ` �� � ' ' °1j 41/`+ �,7 tr5r ` t + •'�r +t`'•+' .f �� t� ?� r rK 1,,ti fC F�\�'. \r r CA,�'..•..n�, 4 � J '�,.r`.Wit `r�r i,' :;S!r Yy�, �. I r tire` ` �y¢ ti J� 4�?r i+i �'Y� •'* f4 r �r t~'� r I H�)fit ,t:+S ♦� *c'•y•�.5 j " l it r y�rrr,y �� r�, t ,.. ^�� 1 r� i C! Y ,'.4 r 1♦.'/�y r ti ` 'M 4 ,`ay ri 7�5�j ,,;�;Yr� .:��, y.�w y^'V'titi� *) \ � S 1,., •i 1 t }, 4 L f t .. 1, ^r. t•: 1 � , y r,, ;i' 1'y'`' \ �` t r ri , 1y�, ,4 a r• 7•,11r i f . ,. < ", ,/ f 1 =l�.rt+.��� 'y♦` �'�^ �. �! 41 i{74 L+}}' �;; � ,tfy+�, ( r!4Sr+m'•' � `rt..,� , .! r';�1i.'�{{.lr� 7ry',p+;ry! ;y.�r1J �•1 .�,.+,1{p �.!' raj 4'Y ,'', 4t) -f1 l�+'i ii' f ��ii l,rr , R4 4 ��: J�R �N��t ).:l,r 1 i 5 • *ti r R"!� a. �; } , .�:�'j R ,rt 'e i�V •�,.� �t r, 5 f '�. �,•+ i t� *' + 1_t. '' 3'j»"�• 11,. }I� 1; �'••f,t�S�+1[�,Fr r �•4 '�� ` W'r�17; �'F, +fir.. �-*ir��:, ff },� r�}• ii� �ty ;'!}�+�: �#'1 �t i� ��+f Y ,,1 r- CL.Y-.'..G�`�`�,Y�w Jk � 'r�L;n h'f'1l r' * �'r! 7 ��4 Sr<<'�:.,�•� n 5 ^i ?'i r r r � >. 5)i1.#f{"}�3{ i y+ r � r r��ti�i�,'l.. Vr�t•.�+•i'�{f4 5 1"��. .� ri! ''r• 4 �I. \`L',t�,�'�^�yr 1l1+ ��� 4.:t`L)-•r�� ' 15,•, a4 \r'" i^n, {�r+ ':;�. f1 tkl�t '� �: 1^'. y .rt ` r 4.�,'i' r !'.• t r t�•r i " r+�l ! a�'t �w a•� i� 4 ,^ Mr 1l1 i • 4 �t �t�t;'.:�� .t t i ,E #"� b:Y ', � 7�"� '�s •�r, - ,- �'t ';.� �.•: ,4 �„ .; �r t .tt,� l ��x �1 .�•^Y�l-'''�k..''� tiinl IMF } 7�:.17: �+�:}v;�p t�j� t !y )'!i �. y'..,,1„ �y�4 .r r `��, ) q Ir r r v�t iyl 1 F;1, ,alh,,r 1�1 i )i Iw • ti"'e ,t�, 1'..M�,. 1'�� �r t+ i y � sr � i' t-. •��'� t4��� ����,�.}:Y .,` 4 +l`� +;�1!�z� �'" ili +1. a�t'�t�• *. 4�}��f,1�+y��+,�+�r,�� f;���fi .3.��:F �`ly{ �1•�ti �+1��j.�y��C��r y. �+ . f � >..•ht� � 1t �»t tltj t + y. . 4.j,/ af, (r' " +++ �' " 3 w�` �` t 1 'lt`�`l'� 7} f�i"�1�11 tifr �`rt}� r ��� {Y ,t„ !k"o.'4•�1 }�i, ��,5ir'�f R�.�Y.[1+,�t1• k'�'4;r` "' r`'• q �+�`�. l `� S a���(, f,'d +tn ys Y riY•r-a1�,r�/ .,� 111s y�.;.']}}l�tr,�' ' ! � ''a•.1 e r. i• S' tiiq' } }��� +�t'i ♦, 1 N)�•1 f ..} t`y, ry� y;4rx11.� i.l +r �1.±.1r fi ? } r�+, �,? � f r ryy,�• {f ,1; it, ^+,•,N1 t, 3Kn. ,1►uT l��+p �t {'. t 1 .1. t '.`•Fta er+;L \�y"'M'0,��+,i �4.'t.t �J•`} r sL�'^,��'4 t t;i .fixJ�' �f 4fv'�1i Atjr.S•' T 5��'r�,.lt I� t' �1 } � "T"11l jtVh�r`.t"t, y +ter ► .,� } y i'l{�1i ys+� r � y,4i � Syr 1t �a{7r " # -,;r 4 � •:��*,)4� :y�4y1{ '4 �6 Si f�,i �!} a1` r})• !t,(+ l� t F `�, •t �c��e �1 * {� ,'i�3:;._ s rl"'y,+�, �.+i a- t � + , ,.V,• t, !')R.,N .�:�' �')d �+'• i! .':.,1., yi.� :r3'.!i +•rt,•,. i .�• f. ?r.t:,.ti/. ,X,,rc ,S�r..�;•>' 1 .Y+ •.5l 'oi' \r:'Jy :r'y nr =1! aw:�r� .4,ti1^" r.d`.6 'S•• .a �'112'.' ., �6 �•-t,i �y y• Yr'r':�'.R'. ! 5 '' �•r + .'15 ,wy:,'�#�` '•1',�• f i`r ; �� '+ 3.; , }i','} � ,�,/,• r'.�5 . )1 ' ,' '^, :) ''j�`�s r� � �t-.1Y ,+.r'+fl ,��,r,h' t!Y_ y�!ti ���4 ?"h:. f. t\� I ,.f r ,� ! '�t- , C�,t,: .,r ''+,� Ix ,4 ry - ?` 4 r��r+tCr�4 I f r,'( ,yy ti. ��\r;i.•r.rty, y'rC: S ''�tri,�*�'fy�..,�,F �. ♦''. f1 �. y•jt}b �' �, rl•.. � '�tl 1I i L �j `` ice.. «t l '. '�i,' yv ! '` y�" i r •, 0 +.S ,+ ,;y aw +'Y,+ �'a+ t +: -V r-.'`'. '• ; `�,4..)h4N,,,� }' ;' \,'V` !-{�/aN {p, �r�.Y'`+ w'Mr k , t �: :!� " ;fir P • tiiilt i.,1y� ` ~ r, •yA rt, +,: a�1ta r�a"i.. "'� v Cr ` Z i•>• �` �•..{�r 4 . y • -t r ti r'Y 'ir 1; f1•I� t,� r . d. r' t4 -.•y a ,. :;L 1 1 .t L N A•• •,4 '.'b' "+ 1 t. r s a `^:d h � rt• TJ'`� 4aFh r�it J K ' t '►.� rr' , •ti 1. I ft'` tJ` ? • !.. - l'i� ;.' .r� •,•ta �h , � Y,,�aF,. _�,.;., jl,1.{it• � ,w.�. � i t,-. rr/. 4w '• `}G• RZ ♦.+ r1' r 1i .rr.�.s t � Ct� A6 1 rV+ •e �y ''JJ�� J �p �i, t+• � } ,} 5. ,4,��1, -..� ,�+} •'�k`,•'yt�, ?3��,,u�iF�*• A�e��, 'S`i}�yya ' ,.i,': ��, i�� '�: ,r\ a" �1•. \. � ri '•}.,y ,� ;'t'1 r:* 'f ,'t�, �. � �:{M1 �/�(ai 1 ti,3.r�t1r4,� +..y... a ,,..`' 5 t} �, •.r4',.r H� �; r +,• ., + ,�., ),�"+5� At r t �. tt r / r t, +♦. i i 1 2 .2 i, t. , � •r � .1.; � �t 4 ?�. � y}r `r.. i s r f 'r 3 • .t,. ! ,t• '�;� ,"�z K i �, , 1•" +� i t'1;''' ` •�"'• � t ir,�!�• '���t � �2�1�� +7 2 ��i I `, �< < «i'''�i Jit �♦' a: t♦ �� .� !�►:. ,q � ( � �� 2 M , 4 �� ¢,,�a } �}• �� � '�,tj» �; J .�� t + s �t t�'i 4 !1l�i � : �',' �.� k ,��'.�J }4�Y'2` �; ^' �ti f�i �• 1' �. ��A4 } . •i� � ,t t. ��' � •`F �� � '.� I�f. ` + a tS � ` f� +�'1� � X,�i�-' ,, � �. � ii� `�t i� 4 't; " � i �' ��{�'t Y�! '• "' � ��� ,h�ii�`y Y ���•' 1p y �y� •((�{ry! b �ji7�y] yf.� � }{.�}(,M 'N, � �i� t,� .Y>��� 1R.'i' t �4 �U. �. .� !�' .��I 11111� 1♦.. ryV Y! .C•. ♦M .•'.Ttt:i .'.("s :f.:'- .S,V4 J +`+ k (r - • 3 ! i • • f • / :• f • • 1 �y J i • t• / • 7�, t ■ 1 • /•t • fr. •,y i? '`.if / • t is t • • • - • ■ / • : / t •h / • ■ i • ■ •/i f • f ■ i• -i • • • t 3 is r r • • • • i / t • t , i i • 3 111 � 111 1 111 ♦ t n i ■ • ■ • i s ♦ i w • / •L r 11 1 I t l l 1 1 1 11 11 1 • , • •:• It1 It( 1 11/ 111 Ill • t: • •:• I11 2 111 1 111 fll 1 1 • :. 11 11 1 111 11 111 2 : t i : • c f t N a ..ti.•, r tir tr ; ,t y +�t t t 1l w i i 5 w y rir tt t •Y rti f :,¢* i1,1 r 1 i, i i tit f,i* 4 'r'-4 •.�• e � t r.ti r t i4 •� �'."`` Y.,.� � �J ♦ dV`�,,�t}'�� � 4 �Y.;'� ,� ► +�t}�` + M hF •,y• r.� r ' '. 1 4,. ` r. i ., V 4 `,� � 1�. y .: I + /r d;.?'' , ,1 y ,,..� I :1i�,�. . � � �1 , J.,i n r •1 - l 4 I '1.J' k.�,I i i' 4 `+yi 5r� 1.? . ,ry�k 1 { ,:.': ,(. .( >J.` i 1 Ir � .� t. + t Y t ^, �. •,.iS •.. i.1 1 +,, 'r'ti 1. •,� �' '■. � r `icy ��,5:; , t•+;�r 'it n'1 ,•1{ 7� �� , j t � '�'ii r{� 5.. J 4,�5,��r v 4 r A ti + ~rS-Ff �i. 1r • l �,'/.,�r , A ��� t �t�p , 4 i l • E', I i?v[�! II � al r+ '��,,a i wtt,� ` � i } ,,• .. c (.h `, �.� 2 I � , 1' Yi` �i �f ;t�4.yl.>t . i ( i+ •,! � +,.��. 1'+,4 r a , ti r .. F ':,,` 5 ♦- y,P L �(,�1 t i 4� i. r r t { � A A i s 4 ,•{ �ryr`�Y + .' / i � ► ,- � a 1 17,��y�r���*��1:,,+ 1t �`:�t � F:. �'S�,y•i t rtr �� Y14�>.�, w�Y��9,1^� 11 ' i �i 4' 2. u 'y'/' 1 ?F �. + ..7 } +'^.wi'��+i t� " r �.; n :>rY`"di , ? ►71 j; y`. i"@:'J , 1.,� `( { ��y , 1.r k { 1 ,` ;;` " '� lG+t ,,_•.a �1 i 914 ';,t r � ( i a� �t �i4.. ,�3.,:.h r {�rt ��1" w•�•;1(t,Sr 7adt fi,�r;�"r� 1 � � A�.�� � t � � � 7� ;' . ► t i�T 1! { S rl n t M �i '.t,t 'r}yt�� • '. �'4 * 77 {{ �. ►t�?`�. Y 4!, c�2„t ,.��i +. ,t�. � S �r� j�,�,t��,ry� •�G� ,, t w L 4 , + !� • � 1.4 , ,�'� Se� s A'�?. , �`,� i T' t t yy 4Y•.�i�,kar \L �� lr;� 1 �14 �� �4 .•,Il{} �r� s 1i � 1, Y'9,' i �, s+gg 9'�,. �t ..y . r ♦tit ,� . 4 Iti 4 f ,L r t(�..� T ,�.T`f�,�� '�'�1 r�.A}����• ,5s �.+, titK t ! it4f� t-,y +Y*+i j�i.� l'ti• ,M,' f-,t h•M y ,t:r i + 3 '1,*, a 1 ,9 sr t"Yll " r ♦. 'k ,; a t lA.4 1 '' t 7 'tY i y �j ♦ Z7TL 1 ,1 � t,, r, i a � � ,;; .,•x , n�'i i J�ip� � {,�r+,•r�, ,: �i � , t',( p 4 a �� �; ' t`� e', 4. t (((( X�i 3 b•yy ?1 {, />< 9 �tFF t rs� . ,? •�,'� i�JstF,� � { , 1�, »t a �'�J.�i-�1.1' .�(�.` i. y'4�' 4' t 't a rY,��,t,`I, ��,1,�,:ti+,�{'� t 4cT1�^fi;�,Rt�9�+� �+��1'•(l`i( •�,J,tJ s +3,i, 4i.. ,i�F ti,l�F. .Er ik,.Fi:�w ,ti!'•l 1�,� 1 't � CrY�N X �"iJf+,r�+�r ���tA�� l �,i}► i' � 9f.*}tiL�+�'.i1 1 ��� ,4 �� �r{s r� r,t{ ��a.T 3tY;� #fi �r,�}� s�R �;�R ��'f s' J�; y tf• 1`i Z }�- s` � 'b `i �, tY♦i4 t,x + r t 1 S 1 t fti�'i'4^td �',��a •�t"r � i+Ap as •� + t 94 4 t �! a >2.l����+j � �4 pp��i �{��y ��� � ' �i, •�"�7�� C� !' k � .��fy�i�,i , 4Y' f,� �►�'`� .. 1' ��° '� 1 1 >;.. rt,A ot� (} '1 e'er f�Xr M+ J ,WkI'v s'f^ ♦J'.!.• t ,*} 4 1}5 / yyy�AA� �Y. .n "w ,"fit ti�,.�>i}tY�iit 1l♦•M�. AS.�'1 ��,_, g1.1<�i,i'f Y jr! ,�T�i�t { it t, t7s 'i`kl '�'2rl`5-,Y] r'��':FC{ A "4} ,7, ,r t1 ri2,y7 .a rF'i�"� X�k+t r{.� u St ��^•�• t r.1WO.L. > ,}d`f!�.,i. •. >.�1.r1;ial.t • 'x 9:i y '`t:J br♦•>..t:\C,4'ct�c:Y :: Ji p,p. . ,it i, A:ir r;' r ♦'., r, x1: i' j Piety `a'„f`2i't , i �ct''t It ,t_ 1%•.iti. 4 i .i1+' r lit bm vII . 1 tr �ytiiz3 1 f ♦ .rt 1 V i t • • k 1; .y i' `,1h r, 1',J3li 1 ,a :�G x+l " y ' 'r" I • R �,Y {, �. �r � 1 •P1{,-� ,I T- ry "t � �.M\, ., s' t F 1 , , • uu 1 r } I r« I ►1° t, 'tT ('.l„ I + 3� "• FY 1' t. a;1 fN,f^fp' , \ i � �,� :�• y � rf \. .ors ti!r a + ,. t ,'•�� 'i,F , .. .+ s;I .11 ♦.k;�. T , .••11{ trr., , a• i.� �� y, 1 ' 7rl � "ry ,, ` .,, r1 �rr�r"r�. "4 " A � s > °: �1. " r I`rr . , ,s { + ,�i ''' ;l,l''+^ �}" t ,h t" lx A;: ! " ,�' r, ...i t ,��,• L7'� `"�N A 'i 1 -.;�� . t + ^ f�•�,'' : �'�.. 4'' r u � � l'�' " ! :.{; i. y;n'y� D � ., ,,. �f-1 'All 1'�•A, r. L Ii.' , } �`, 1; '� 1,?• 4� '4, s\ 3,r1a1 `�'� ^ y � 'tr'\ t �, 1 5 S ��; �1 t, h , r•r �,�i s J + - , 1« 1 '. w�7r 1 , i. S1 ; � F f' � G �'+(, 1 ^' ��i� �r r�-. 4 � 4 � l.'•�« � �7( S '. s , r a ♦ f i ♦i . 2:t " y r n � S� 1 #' � w trr `1 Y� � �, 9lsi. J♦ " :ti . �} ( ik } k ^tfl ,) , 1. �. 1 y S '` '1• 2 f r. v i-A #,� S ��Y iz,�,•�` ! i}t: '.i�� a,r I �, .. `l,�I_ `. 7 .L S ��4"txY # Y1'�.. f r,�;�`�'�'M / s � ..�,Y ��� t�`�: t4el r + � 1 �n,q..1 t :><, �``� r •�W r�.r � 'y /'� ,� t,tta,� �'+il � �.q°t �/ .�y� ♦ w '�5,. l,j. �; r ti f ,y$,� Ott � � r�y�}t1�1 ���j l'} 1t. '1 r.'{�j 4'S+i;! w •�•;�k �y .�y4'�f � ' S� r !t r 4 +}c v.S ► Y .01 S t t� �} /.��{( t. r �{{` e �' �cr • `� y�1C �,��rl 4�, ' ' L Y• ��r W't p� S�y �(,, � y� 2 0 S, 1' (w ty' i� V!,�f i� l. ,1! , 1f �r +•i).' � , s ! 1� ��r9 t �„ s +'{ 1 t_ ?}�"V��i�4•d� r � 1 2 t,�tk�� �yrt��.1. � f 1,;c,�.� ty {i'r•Ir`� —.'1 Y!!r � }i �ti Gay '' .'��-w S� ly ♦,"4i' ' r + ,y 'b l 4�� t"r:, 1�, 'v t+ ' '^, `., �' Y �- �' i ,r 1 t., �' s ,;, 'p`�1• .art >, '� Itf J {,' Ik, y l ♦b',`a \ �.n�f •�� , t�', t1.', x�1�..,,, d�{�"♦ 5 x��, hr 6t i yt1� ! 4 ^,[A }� ,s� �.k �' 3;,�„t7�.;,•"�a �. � 1 �„tI )��� � i !I : }� ,>„� t. s E ;� , ,{` ., 3'f�"�,'•+! i}♦I}.��� ,+}rY�1{C• 'f'' +. I !. �k'11I. tt �.+a 4i� Ky t. ,. t }f ti. 1�t`� 1� '"�:..' t' G r #h�(' itl{ t �!�+tf. i 1�� �•1l'� 5+�. •HAY tlyi+'t+'ZSw f'� ' • +�i�.i '"�5• 1�11:� �r,�,�11,. }(y`'C �j, � i 1♦ 4' �1 �sl` , � ,t�,, ! � e J at'��• rvf, "'1•er�- ,'S t '( vo, .�07 .,`� � r1 �tw }* �'�� +�%§f �c�i��}%� I� �y,1,�tw t, t;i�,� .•f_v'{,�sY;r"�� �i'+'It�°�j��a Z+�y �:.}�,. �p � ,•����.,;� • � �, �iYA� � �,t��t'�Wa¢Z , S{A„�:,lav �1.s,1' Y^ �51;1'!s t� �_r ,� ..., st�'Stj.,,is ia'�. �'"� !*'1, �,�'�; ��`' Sy i1::: \i �„i �� } • �rRs\,,, 2 l �\ l� (fir s.4..1if��{%( ¢� *.�ti1t G`ur" ; f�+lt! .� 15.. i•���•� ,,; .,�,� «� 1,i�'1 e►t w'41r h � swdY� r ��' �.+rr tir 5� z ♦k.�, ,�,i: , t �f+"f �b � 1, y 1 `. ' �� uy'l e � � t ,t c ti+ { •'�,•1 yl K; .�y3 t,t, A{' �.r'L �t; "�e +t +�1 x,u�1'�k r �� 1 ��1� ' ttr }�.'�",,�`1'%',�...�:. �`tt..•Stk 7�tt1�, ..,�� J l s�^r� J,� a'�4.�+Flr .y1.y�S,R +L T..S� y.�'1}��k y+e�',;�� a �}� �r.. t•}�T�;�1r '•y��;�►�.�'.4�r+ c+"��r�,i'�r`H�i ;,�-� 1�+i '`',-:J�,"�1rL.1�'1t'd�. �!,,:�y A {!'.�"+�, +'ik i'"4 yJ w^+*» y�{r ;.i�1r��;t32V �!� r w !•' 'Y)b, •1'�+,r\'.1'+. •'YY�.^, 11 S►�",� 'T'�'r I,r,."lt,�1;.t,I1'+' F+1 �"i,, ,.,7j:i ;} ',t,� ✓! a ; ,^' d; t 4L . 4 �'!, •� �'� t t 1 -IJ�� k1.L � „r'' /���� SZj4.��,1 M �"t �J � � l'+ f R •{t�'a�"� }� '�" � ! S• x *�'�,'•� � �,l+�' ,y� 'S f`'�Y�f , 1� � ££f •r i'. !�pJ { �i. '`'/ �4 � t J 7 ,J���}i A !\�i• f 1� `� �� t�'.rtL. ,.1� , �. � "'' � ••''� ai ,�i `�,��y�' �'1 �� �t{' �`' '� r.r �i i�� y yy { { rY r •11 � i��, ;1� i� +. +h tL �f''� Uyf J � '� • �� 1+ 1K, +,'. �� j ,[, r�r, (;' y }11�, /� , .y�jr- + .� iG•'7•r�jy,� r, )'�e = } + '}iy ! �• � r �i j l tr ►�� el•r � r " 'i��•u �{�f1. t t yy Y Y:�Y ? �+ JR T ;� • 'F . r, t i' f'L3, i' f. 3 J .4 i S �,H✓;. t ..• Fl ... .,E.. �J r� i 1 • • / • • - r s s .. L : • • L •: t : r i a 'i r • • i � • : i /• z - s • • • s: / r J •i • a . • L : ' t r ••: • • 1 / 2 i 'i t L• : r • s . f t f : L a • • • • S • / i t • 7 • •/ • r Z• • . • r • � . L i /i I • i f • • • r . r i r • i C S 1 i •. f •• 't: S f • . • • J i • f • r f i L t • •Z 1 • • a •: . 2 - • • t:: i f i t t . L S I • • i i i i i: • r ! • 1 f • 1 i • Irr • . t i • • • • • t L r \ i f r 2 / a • S L • • r / •• • i • i • tit l • S 1 • / I I • / S i 1 1 f f a f } r; 1 :1 .P f + x aa �! 1'� ,► rl.- � t'tr : `, e .y f►�w L r 4, '1Z.e�! �t ty','' •i t• {ytt9 r: Y. �> i.�ir T�► 1 l r. kr" ?i\ �.,•'� f�. ,f'�4 {)) ..r, .}`� :jr(r : "r�. }�• ti +1 . , K tff,l� t�p� y J f• n1 ,.:.i t 5.. ry fpy . r ,�.r• Cr �.. .{.11♦t : U. +'' .1 `i}� .++ t.1k r f�,� ti 4''�• F- ': i,i �;,,, F•i�a`.:c+. y�+r f .J,� ��.�. r V'Lr•y ,�,��. �,.1',A.y-S" ih�' � f' � S 1 ,. } '�,�) r ��' t „ y� , 1 ! t r' '• I 'rtl .�r�.' i{,' ,jf#•, 5•�'l:}i. IR `� L'.N�ft A: v r^• ,; ♦5;� �` t, a . >r Y h.. � ►+••- , t,,r� ;•ti ,� � J�T1�,' ' ,•� kt, Lr � �5�,>:. 4.. r 1 4 � i+ ry � r'.*? L� � •-r r... h, --�`'r -! .Jj ,}rC{ .,•.-t y', y,�- t ti to } t r C 7} � � '. �' � +. 1 r t +4 V' ) � r* k�l7A .1 � L. yl'. •�r,X. r.i a 1 �% r?4f: � ,,,� ��. 7� •p R� ti,r`� ,< +r�`+ t � � :.4% a�t4�'� � x' ���. .f��� �e�. � ,r y�qw�{ rr '>•,+a ✓� I a 1 .x t �' t rr r r ¢ �i, .'1. N M a 4 _. r i,♦.1,, y i."r•! �f .F r 1'tiy' , Lf� ' ♦ Y;r�Mr ! 7 + e� I. '�• 1 i. 74l_ � + 1 ,",1 ': ; 1t rA 1 .f �1' �," •t/.�t. �:'4 r :';i �' t r ' � �: , �`i"r1t J1•,. � ,�a:, �it�af+•,'�s��'JS i j �y!.}���� +}' j,,"�,� r;���A.'-+�"����4.'1� �•. 4 '!1',#Y `t� R ♦1''t�`t'-ojSt�l 1, t .�♦ � �T � �+} '✓• 'cK ' l 1` •; tip ' ���:;' � .. i,l,y • �fl *r�,r 7•xd''p' t ,. �r l ,jrK+n2 il' 7, + ,1'�l" M.r.r ,}.� � w, '..,i, L<, r�r { -� �� •,i �•S(,� t.{�.;J K� .�t. + .z ( ..... >rtr , *. r'. �ry,�e4'.,. ' 17,{ r✓. � s � h �, 5 , ;�`t i n 1���, A 1� Y (� ,�'. �'� r; r�i�i��t • :r+�' }'V �" � +l� "ri ` .;ri. "` ial � l+ ? I�,t• �` �► �' ''"f � �r'R }�iR,S �� s {�, , !•f k' w la ,•� �LN r 'G '�i ti l a, " x�r. �k` '` f ) R,�Y.�r 5.t .�,..*�,iy�t �I y•,# � �1�,,,, r.,tg� � ♦rl 9, - L„� t�try a{'!'•�! ; �•'1 0 •. ,L�,•t,, '�, ,�+ t 4 a Sf • .yMJt��a)� .r i5a t � t 1 t l} �t: c•}h ! { J ,., r r l �;r �r r'Y i,Y , l 1+ t 1• } 1 r4 k'i A t , rr/ fi. ,t rpp } rY•' '�l 1'Yt' ?�( r,'w T If, ��(. ,�r 2`• �;♦dt ,Y5 ,�, � t t fl L��� ,rM1� . ��#�,t,,,}��er } .ter '��� T� 1 , '�'�, �,v r r ` y t Y�� �\r �f.Y r 1,� fh 'ti. + Y t ir«„ 1 t• ��f � � a {.. t 3;•�+� '+1ti +;i �}•1� � 4�` ,r r ,;•e� �S 1L w„'4, Via• �►i 4`j'1 '�1�,1�,,�,+� ���1 C x�J' 'r� +x�i•"`a' ttt.f� r' �' 1� ?�t�i 1� � 4�5� e},5N .�X "i ;a � u.r1R '}Y r r�y{�j� /r to {U;`C+�,� ��',r�+• �.t. n t L•�t1; } t 1�7 �Ltt �., u!, �r�,s ti 4"L`�C 1 ,,�I; c t ti • �,Y1) /fjS•\,\�.r�rY4 't L ,r3 � 1, !'� ti" ��11r i L�, s + tst� �+ * '•} J +1:i t fyd i+¢T t 4 }t t 1, ♦ .'', tr t' ��Y r<" i y ) �,4xs� I.r 7t 'r•Il* k f{ Y " � �i��3i] ,�1 �\�.F i j� ��t >t�i r.�>;t'��r t�rtit#��y d i'���y�i ,?ti�' :`r�y{ ►y ri��:Yj�"t� .l,� / \ + � • { dt y ,r [ h i'i r1 bar'/• u.,, ls•tA S d i �v(•fr i (,t�R•L ��� r• ...,•, � :r �, ! G � ♦ 1 tl l`j',.,,i{:ti � 'L L •! t � ask, � � ,� (' '�S: ;'�•i 't:t'y tit' y? � 1 n �'ari t� �,rJt (a�1�j ,r��1{tl r t/�,�h �l � t �"�����y,5 "ut, W,�^ �• icy((��� 01p � 4��r{y� 7t t}hr • p•�•t�C ef.� �tf� ,fit i� {�.J �'•♦..�i Zf .'# ♦ �t� •ty fit:"i• 13Y \ �1, ' 5 'v» t � Z ttt /!1 a Cf+' 1 ,-, 4 t;y#'�t +t•'�LJ�,;It .,�s1-`',���k. tylr�,�f��y�,; 4 , ,.�"� r� t e�,t�' '� � �•�{ ���'� .tr� , ,-r.,.ui(tti.a�rr 1y tt 'C" .•�ft, ,��,1,,�.t,41�",'t�{r's°3 r. i;TyL it ?' u , "C r � } ��,S�� � �1 1`.. T ���:+x 1+ �4� ♦• •j�!y tlt vyyrlA' t i� : f tl�r ' 1 ���+tiprtit�,f�.L3,4{''" 7 r+)1 �•t� t r„ '� 4 r gg r nt1 4¢v� L ,'�dL:S�tAY���,'��4T��kJ- �► t''N '������� a��('^y;1�,t�1� 1, :f.i,r .ilr;j,.:,5i'S.f: `�. x... •'"- r,,♦ ',•;•,ry`r!"•:�.'tr h •„ .. a •'� a ' 2.0 MAJOR AMDIDMENT REQUESTS The various amendment requests analyzed In this section are shown In Figure 2.1. 2.1 Ellia'Avbnue between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets 2.1.1 Background Yhl5 amendmentitem Is the'result,of a lone history of events Involving Talbert Avenue and Huntington Central Park. In the late 1960's, Talbert Avenue was recognized by the City as a County arterial which when fully developed would provide an cast-west link between the Huntington Beach coast, the 405 Frcewey, and .major .north-south arterials In the vicinity of Grange County Airport and South Coast Plaza. As such, Ote City% Circulation flan Indicated the street continuing uninterrupted across the Cl,;, An plans were developed for Huntington Central Park, ;however, th;; City Council decided that it would be undesirable to bisect the park with an arterial. t In order to avoid splitting the park, Talbert Avenue was realigned on the City's Circulation t-Ian to curve_ unuth to what wns axpecwd :o be the southern � boundary of the Bark and then aviing back north to meet the pravlotio alignment of Talbert Avenue at Springdale Strout. The curve was to begin cast of Goldenwest Street and conclude with the same approximate curve between Edwards and Springdale Streets as currently exists. This alignment was never constructed, however, for two reasons. Engineering studies Indicated on old landfill near the southeast corner of Goldenwest ard,Taibort Streets which would not physically support construction of an arterial without expansive replacement of soil. Additionally, plans for the Huntington Beach Central Library near the northeast corner of Talbert Avenue . and Goldenwest Street made the southern realignment of Talbert. Avenue east -4. {'z r i . i • 5 fi ' t of Goldenwest Street u»desirable. For thaw reasons, th curved alignment of { Talbert Av:^ue between Edwards Street and the area east of Goldenwest Street was deler.,e from the Circulation Plan in ,1976. The isrvead alignment of Talbert avenue between 'Edwards and SprIngdalg Street'i temnined, however, becau" of development and street dedications which had occurred In th. s ensuing time. t During the time that the City was realigning and deleting Talbert Avenue, the County's Circulation PIan continued to Indicate Talbert Avenue as a straight ( east-west arterial through the City. The County has also continued to,express the need for reinstatement of a similar alignment on the Circulation Plan in order. to establish conslatenry with the County plan. It Yam partly ln'reopcnse to that pressure that the City began to consider the realignment of Ellis Avenue with Talbert Avenue as an alternative to the reconnection of Talbert to Talbert. t _ In 1978, the City Council directed staff to analyze the feasibility of realigning the partion of Ellis Avenue between Edwards end Goldenwest Streets nor`hwsrd to intersect with Talbert Avenue at Edwards Street (see Figure Z-2}. This regUest''was Initially considered as part of General Plan Amendment 79-16 In March, 1979. .The Planning Commission, however, deleted the request pending new Infarmation concerning future traffic volumes on the proposed extension of Balsa Chica'and Edwards Streets frorn'the City traffic model which was being prepared by the consulting firm of PBQ do D. The Planning Commisslon's Faction was appealed to the City Council, which directed staff to inclucib the Item in the next amendment to the Circulation Element. The:Item came back In 1980 'as part of Circulation Element Arnerufmcnt 804. B6cau,.-!.q `ttie traffic modal had still not been completed, however, the entire Circulation Element Amendment,,was tabled In March, 1980, by the Planning Catinmisissirm. The Planning Coiiimiaslon also re3qus3stod that the item be further rinalyzed In conjunction with circulation planning for Edwards and 38th Streets and Garfield Avenue. Additionally, they requested analysis of oil opiezr6tt'-wisIn ties affected areas as they impact the feasibility of the realignment and the actual costs of constructing the roadway. The portl6i of Ellis Avenue In question Is presently a two-lane undivided roadway 'terminating ut Edwards Street and carrying an estimated 600 vehicles p-zr day. Tho existing arterial highway plans for bath the Cltyi and.the County i of Orange designate Ellis Avenue as a priniary arterial extending westerly down the bluff to an Intersection with the proposed extension of SQ'Isa Chica Street. Talbert Avenue e3xl3ts as a two lane undivided roadway between Gothard Street And Goldenwest Street where It terminates. Talbert picks up again at Edwards Strezt:,t approximately 1,600 feet north of Ellis Avenue as a two-Irene undivided roadway which has adequate width to be restriped as a four Anna secondary arterial. The roadway presently terminates at the City be dndary west of Springdale,Street. They City% Circulation Plan designates Talbert Avenue as a primary arterial from Newland Street to Gothard Streot and an a secondary arterial between Gothard and Goldenwest Streets and between Edwards Street nnd"the propcacd Bolas Chico Street extension. Tho'County's Circulation Plan designates Talbert Avenue as a primary arterial throw the entire City and Intersecting with the Boise Chico Street extension. i -S- mom 40 ll - ` • t+•� Sul 02 •� 1 S •r l..- ...- ti�!��'{{'.?•,V,nn �tJ•C CF _ •� ?�� �1 ;' �� ��. ��rr�, ri•� 1•� V t - A ;tP wkt TER{ � ,tom�:��s,�� . �+a,.:si;���.. t � __-�'� �'. .•-_..- -717 � +� rt'• � �•:l'.�'�'• cF•t+ ` �'�• :.�-.� St- i •*Ibt.irlE. i S 4 r *;►�:?• fit' 41 - , i•S» ": tea! ._.�.�..� ,` l G} p CF«N - ,�•M } 4 If t'1J:;x4; ST �a l . r"_ +.?"••ate _- f-'" LA "'A A �LtGtv[Vl��'[ Q�no ELLIS bL1NN`� M•� 4 SLUS f S. 'fir F:Lgu're 2-2 _ dV� The land to the north and south of Ellis Avenue Is primarily vacant with the exception of.several horse stables and scattered oil wells end storage tanks. The land to the r.oulh of Talbert Avenue east of Goldenwest Street is vacant and the land to the north Is occupied by the Huntington Beach Central Library and Central Park. Talbert Avenue to the. west of Edwards Is surrounded by single family tract houses. The Land Use Element designates the majority of the area north of Ellis Avenue as Open Space. At thu northwest corner of Ellis and_ Goldenwest Avenues, however, Is a 10 acre site designated as General Commercial. The area south of Ellis Avenue Is designated for Estate Residential development with a maximum density of two dwelling units per gross acre. 2.1.2 Analysts Three alternative alignments for the area of concern will be analyzed (Figure 2-2). Alternative 1 Is the connection of Ellis Avenue crest of Goldenwest Street to Talbert Avenue at Edwards Streit. Alternative 2 Is the previous alignment of Talbert Avenue mast of Goldenwest Street curvirn south around take Huntington and connecting to Talbert Avenue at Edwards Street. Alternative 3 Is essentially the no project alternative. It assumes that Ellis Avenue and Edwards Street remain where they are but are Instead merely upgraded to secondary ntendards. This section Analyzes the effects of the proposed Ellis and Talbert Avenue alternative alignments on (1) circulation patterns In the. Immediate, area and ? across the City, '(2) exlstinq a,�d projected traffic volumes in the area, (3) response capabilities of the City's fire and paramedic craws, (4) existing and planned land uses in the area Including all operations, Huntington Central Park and the proposed linear park, (5) fiscal impact, abut(6) environmental quality. Circulation Although the portion of Ellis Avenue In question only carries a current average ?' traffic volume of 600 vehicles per day, the arterial Is potentially a vital component of both the local and regional circulation network. If realigned as {` proposed, Ellis Avenue would provide direct east-west access between the Son } Diego Freeway and the coastal wren of Huntington Beach, which Is presently � provided only by Warner Avenue and, to a lesser extent, by Edinger Avenue. The Importance of Ellis Avenue has been emphasized for two reasonss (1) there } Is an existing off ramp for northbound traffic on the Sari Olejo Freeway at Euclid Street which feeds directly Into Ellis Avenue, and (2) the previously mentioned action by the City Council deleting the portion of Talbert Avenue between Edwards and Gatdenwow. Streets, thereby ellrminating the possibility of using that arterial for direct access between the freeway and the cowsl. Because Ellis Avenue Is potentially a crucial link in the circulation network, �. various segments of the street have been mod;fled or are bairn modified In otdor to Increase Its ability to accommodate east-west traffic. In 1900, the right-of-way between Gothard Street and the Saithem Pacific Railroad was developed with an underpass under the railroad to allow traffic to flotr smoothly along Ellis Avenue: between Gothnrd and Delaware Streets. s .6. Another issue with Ellis Avenue which Is in the process of being at least par tlally .resolved Involves the Intersection of Ellis Avenue, Main Street and ©each Boulevard. Presently, there is no convsnle6t. wny to. get eastbound traffic across Beach Boulevard. Also, westbound traffic Is channeled primarily onto Main Street from which a dangerous right turn movement through traffic merging onto Main Street from Beach Boulevard must be mada in order to gain access to Ellis Avenue. Plans have recently been prepared and construction begun for elimination of the free right turn from Beach Boulevard and signalization the Intersection of Ellis Avenue and Main Street. These Improvements should significantly Improve the usability of Ellis Avenue as an east-west arterial. The proposed realignment of Ellis Avenue west of ` Goldenwast Street would further augment the system. Additlonally, consideration hus been given to radically modifying Main Street in conjunction with the eventual recycling of the Five-Points shoppinrl ce4eter. One possibility would be to connect Main Street to Ellis Avenue via Ue !aware Street. This would slmplify the Main Street/Ellis Aveaetue/Beach 13oulevt3rd Intersection by eliminating this 45 degree Main Street Intersectinne In favor of the 90 degree Ellis Avenue Intersection with Beach Boulevard. Access to Main Street would then be gained from Ellis Avenue rather than gaining access to Ellis Avenue from Main Street as its presently the caste. Emphasis of Ellis Avenue at Beach Boulevard as an cast-west arterial In this manner would be m.orea effective than the signalizatlon and frees right turn elimination now punned. Alternatively, if Taibw-t Avenue were reinstated butw+een oldenwest and Edwards Streets, the entire set of issues related to, tied Beach Boulevard - Main Street .- Ellis Avenue Intersection wo+lld be avoided. Talbert Avenue.is +, presently constructed In a straight line from Gothard Street'to beyon&thte 405 Freeway and therefore provides a more direct and contlnuous connection between Huntington Breach, the freeway and the South Coast Plaza and airport area. In order to connect 'Talbert Avenue" to Talber`t Avanuee. between ;'1 Goldenwest and Edwards Stroetc; however, a loop would need to be constructed around the southern tend of Lake Huntington, cutting In half an Important port of Central Park. Land use Issues associated with this alternative alignment are addressed In n later pat tinn of this analysla. ' Another Issue. that should be; considered Is the affect that realigning Ellis ' Avenue would have on the existing arterial and right-of-way and Its planned extension to t3otsa Chica Street. By rerouting,Ellis Avenue, to intersect with Talbert.Avenue, one proposers oast-west connection to Bolsa Chico Street would be eliminated since the existing right-of-way between Edwards and 31oldeenwest ; Streets would most likely be abandoned. If this connection Is lost, however, the Garfield and Talbert Avenue connections will still remain to provides east-west access to Bolsa Chloe Street. Implementation of either the Talbert-Talbert alternative or the no project alternative would allow for the futures connection of Ellis Avenue to Bolan Chien Street. ` A160 at Issue Is tile eveintual possible realignment of Edwarda .StrLmt at the t bottom a, tilt bluff as currently Indicatod on the Cityes Circulation Plan. The r realignment of either Tillie Avenue or.Tnlbe:t Avenue would not be Impacted by moving Edwards Street' to the bottom of the bluff, but the no-project } f a .e -r -7- .v>sr.,.., '.r..+-- ..:[�.=aJ 7:.. ... ... .., ,, ... .. .ar•... <. .. . .+:t... i ..,4'f ..., ...,,.,...,'t... ., .. _ .-........,. ....-. ......._._......,......�...vow.,.....v.«....,..au w..n.+Rw+++w...nY �.r S^ F 1. . alternative would be negatively Impacted. If the current Ellis Street alignment were to remain and Edwards Street was moved west to the bottom of the bluff, It would require east west bound traffic to negotiate a tight 45 degree turn either on or off of Edwards Street In order to continue up either Talbert Avenue to the west or E11i5 Avenue to the east. F The City Department of Public Works has estimated current traffic volumes on Ellis and Tsibert Avenues, as well as other surrounding arterials. As shown In Figure 2-3, EIlis Avenue currently carries 6,000 average daily trips (ADT) between Newland Street and Beach Boulevard, 1,300 ADT between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street and 600 ADT between Goldenwest and Edwards Streets. Using the County's level of service Indicators, all sections of Ellis Avenue are presently operating at the A level of service for their respective construction standards. Talbert Avenue (also Figure 2-3) currently carries 50000 ADT between Newland Street and Beach Boulevard, 4,200 ADT between Gothard and Goldenwest Strects and 2,000 ADT between Edwards Street and the western City aoundary. s These numbers Indicate that Talbert Avenue Is also operating at the A Ievel of service for both secondary and primary arterials.. The Transportation Demand Model was used to project the impacts of the alternative Ellis-Talbert and Talbert-Talbert allgnments In the year,1995. As I.i shown In Figure 2-4, projected traffic volumes along Ellis Avenue range from = 25,500 ADT between Delaware and Gothard Streets, 21,700 ADT between Gothard and Goldenwest Streets, 23,500 ADT on the proposed realignment between Goldenwest and Edwards Streets, 15,800 between Edwards and Springdale Streets, and 6,400 between Springdale End Bolsa Chico Streets. According to .these projected volumes, Ellis Avenue will be operating at the F level of service between Delaware and Gothard Streets, at the D'level between Gothard and Goldenwest Streets, at the E level on the new alignment between Goldenwest and Edwards Streets, and at the A level between Edwards and Bolsa ` ChIca Streets. These levels of service are based upon a 4 lent) undivided ` roadway as could be expected for a secondary arterial. The projected traffic volumes also indicate that If the Ellis realignment Is selected, Ellis Avenue should possibly be redesignated as a primary arterial between Beach Boulevard and Gothard Street and the realignment between GotharJ and Edwards Street also designated as a primary rather than secondary. With a primary arterial designation an these sections of Ellie Avenue, the entire roadway between i + Beach Boulevard and the Bolsa Chica extension would function nt the A level of f service. Alternatively, on street parking could be eliminated to allow striping for additional lanes, without the neceb31ty for additional right-of-way acquisition. The Transportation Demand Model run for the Talbert-Talbert, alternative (Figure 2-5) Indicated traffic volumes of 27,100 ADT between Beach Boulevard and .Go'thard Street, 24,200 ADT between Gothard rnd Goldenwast Stmets, 19,600 ADT between Goldenwest_ and Edwards Street, 17,800 ADT between Edwards and Springdale Streets, and 7,4110 ADT between Springdale and Solna Chico Streets. According to these projected volumes, Talbert Avenuo will be operating at the C level of service between Beach Boulevard and Gothard Street If this portion of the street is fully developed to primary arterial t . E :1 S, . � 1 '.-- ww.+......�r._,.,,«.,..ta•r.,...,_...... .� )) 1. .... .-.-•._..... .... r ,.,+.^,r'a.'.�>nr-„ ,,... ,1�,'.... .a'.......`_•::t.:.�'_...t::J `.�',«.._�..i�•l��k�^t'�\:j..t'•j•�}.�'�3'Y Al a z GRa, � 0 SPRINGDALE ell may. EDWYARDS .SfOc`7ca 7,000. 8,700 t� 0 GOLDENWEST 19 l 000 Iq 000 U C� y to ,, 13 .. C m f r.. "' 43 T ARD w $'1400 100 .too -tF w w. , OF 0 ' , 7 '( 610 ,i az •�.,�� CyRAHA0V1 coV C. psi 300 CID o � p O c �a� SPRINGDALE • � oZ5 300 .�Si;/CO � 1 0 x EDWARDS 7,300 /3,70U It O v t ..Mo 1 � M• f GOLDENWESY Y3,700 gl,Ooo q(o;,?-Do J17,/v0 m GOTHARD .00 `P i. AM 70 !jwoo f �0AM1 9 v - ,�� p�G•-G -•• GRAHAM w 1S1�O WOW �s ' Ole SPRINGDALE ,/00 .L3,Q2c�G � r 0 Y 'EDWARDS 10 Ln a Q .�.o�.D�H�v�sY � 3 �,?40 ,l000 H9,dt00 ! yq,,2.00 50 Rn GfJTFiARD 19, tvo o,s'ar0 .Za.,700 • � S standards as depicted on the current Circulation Plan. Tnlbert Avenue would operate at the F level of service between Gothard and Goldenwest .Streets If this portion ,remains a secondary arterial as shown on the Circulation Plan. Between Goldenwest and Edwards Streets, Talbert Avenue would operate at the C level'of service for a secondary and between Edwards and Springdale Streets It would operate at the B lovel of service for a secondary as currently shown on the Circulation Plan. Talbert Avenue would operate at the A level of service between Springdale. and Salsa Chico Streets. These projected volumes Indicate that the Talbert-Talbert alternative would be usad by slightly more driversthan the.Eilis-Talbert alternative. The probable explanation fnr this Is that Talbert ; Avenue provides more direct access to B-sch Boulevard and the freeway, and Is therefore easier and more convenient for drivers to use. . Though that Transportation Demand Model wass not used to analyze the no-project alternative, the City. Department of Public Work3 manually prepared 1995 traffic projections. As shown In Figure 2-6, the effect of the no project f alternative would be to slightly increase traffic on Slater Avenue and on Edwards Street truth of Ellis Avenue. Traffic volumes on the existing alignment of Ellis Avenue between Goldenwest and Edwards Streets would be 1;300 ADT. .These numbers Indicate that rather than muving west on Ellis Avenue and then north on Edwards Street to Talbert Avenue, traffic would use ' other east-west arterials such as Warner, Slater and Garfield Avenues to"gain access to the`Talbert-Graham-Solsa Chica Street area. This avoidance of Ellis Avenue would likely be Increased If Edwards Avenue is eventually m-located to the"foot of the bluff as indicated on the Circulation Flan. ! t Emergency Service Response ! The Fire Department has endorsed.the:proposed realignment of Ellis Avenue as a'means of,providing rapid free flow direct access from the Gothard Station to the area lying south ii; Slater Avenue between Graham and Edwards Streets. In establishing a long range fire protection plan for the city, the Fire Department had recommended the construction of o'n3w fire station In the area of Talbert and Graham to serve. that general area as the Balsa Chico area developed. ' Coupled with the new station would be the relocation of the Heil Station to a location at Edinger Avenue and Graham Street to Improve response to the western Huntington Harbour area. This pian was approved by the City Council In July, 1974. Because the future development status of the Bolso Chico area remalru { unresolved, the need for an additional fire station Is questionable. . The Fire ! Department recommends the proposed Ellis Avenue realignment to forestall, if i not eliminate, the need for a new station and to ensure that the Talbert/Graham area Is adequately served by the engine company and paramedic unit based at the Gothard Station. if the. Ellis-Talbert alternative is not selected, the Fire Department has Indicated that they could accept the Talbert-Talbert connection instead, though It would be less desirable than the Ellis-Talbert connection because of the extra di3tance to be traveled. The Fire Department will not endorse the no-project alternative. �I -9- 'Me+.+r ti"�'u.O r+Je,w.•wI ,r r...r..w......�...�.. ....... .... .. ........_�.... •.. .. ..7. .l. •r....i ni.f 1, ... .» .............y......, »» w•V.wa..MYfh<hC'I:yi •r i Am oOF { 20 05 . vz° f r 'ate, GRANAM a fi SPR1 GDALE Op aZG,SQO a.&) 700 , • � (1' oy � 4 ' 0 ~ EDWARDS /3 000 /3,Ooo 171700 �1,300 O Q w to GotDENWESt . la-,yob 3cn,90o y��boo ya.,400 w m � m -.f3 �^ "♦ GOTHARD as w /715,00 moo,Boa A3 i loo . K' I' R' r• Land Use In addition to the circulation Issues previously addressed, the effects of the proposed alternative alignments of Ellia .and Talbert Avenues an the ultimate land uses in the surrounding area need to, be analyzed. According to the General Plan Lard Use Element, the existing Ellis Avenue alignment establishes the boundary,between the Area designated Open Space to the north and the Estate Residential area to the south. The southern boundary of Central Park was established 660 feet north of the centerline of Ellis Avenue by the City : Council In January, 1975 (see Figure 2-7). This boundary Is also reflected In the Open Space and Conservation Plan of the General Plan. The City Council has observed this boundary In subsequent acquislticin efforts, with the exception of the small lot areas north of Ellis Avenue. Each ye'ar, the County of Orange hat; offered the City the first right to acquire properties In the City on which taxes have become delinquent. Over a number of years, the City has acquired many such lots both north rind south of the adopted park boundary, as well as several iota south of Ellis Avenue. On November 14, 19770 the City Council approved a motion to designate all of the small lets north' of Ellis Avenue as a future part of Huntington Central Park and approved the acquisition of additional small lots in this area. This rctlon, combined with the pro-1975 acquisitions, has had the effect of extending the park boundary south to Ellis for a portion of the area between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets. Only `two areas north of, Ellis Avenue remain outside the established park boundary; the five acre area at the northeast corner of Ellis Avenue and Edwards Street, and the ten acre area at the northwest comer of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street. On December 21, 1961, the Cliq Council adopted Land Use Element Amendment 81-3 which changed the General Plan designation of the ten acre area from Open Space to General Commercial. This action eliminated the possibility of this site being ,acquired for Central Perk. The other five acre area, however, may still eventually be acquired by the City. z The proposed realignment of Ellis Avenue would bisect the park as It Is presently planned, which would create a situation similar to that which the City Council attempted to avoid by deleting Talbert Avenue in 1976. However, with the advent'of the linear park t4sneepL and expanded open space areas, It would } be difficult to maintain a contiguous park area and at the some time provide adequate access and circulation to and around the park. Figure 2-0 illustrates properties that the C&jnty of Orange has proposed for acquisition to link Huntington Central Park with the linear park. The proposed realignment of Ellis Avenue would actually Improve pedestrian and equestrian access between parks, using natural topography to provide a grade: separation. By bridging the topographic depression shown in Figure 2-9, both vehiculcr and pedestrian access are maintained, eliminating the ne?d for a road crossing at Edwards Street (which ultimately is to be abandoned if the re alignment Is adopted.). In "190, the City Department of Public Works prepared an ,analysis of alternative alignments of Ellis Avenue to connect with Talbert Avenue. The purpose of the study was to determine the feanihillty of realigning Ellis Avenue �v In such a way as to provide a smooth flow of ttaffle, adequately traverse the i . .18_ Z/,• e 1 1 1,1 I , � e r a 1�e e � �� • M CF-R r .. �r gamma �-- r#ELP AM .j low as o=as FMMNG PARK BMMAW .f aseaoa�aa S!".Nt.L Lor rc=STTjcts Figure 2-7 x r 1J �. a i Y ,�.�. f 7 "�� �•Vic! b.�•:��(fiLLrT'�.`. � 1, �...�•� «e -;,��1,� •• � .•-, 17 ws 14 ''�j `� .4 �•',1. 's'r � ', � Q ,� �,' �� ' . �.��,,..�ry�•�L�'!J. _,ty' ��,r 'r� ••`S-' /j•� +; I l� � •fir � L ►.►^"yam-• ,ems % •.'.! 1 �� ,• '« 3•+' I �t �I �• f• �NA f I t 1. ` ���„ Orr" +,��,�.' /.��I(I'r.*��•,. ;. ♦ /'� �../ 17 'Y' ,1t�'`.�,, ,J ! S�l�••••• . 'mot• L y1 • \ �•�J, "•���'\KVY✓✓s, ��• . t. 1 ` "�i.`:;. , ems:. '„k i E•• ` •�N. POSSIBM LIWM PAN% PRDPr_MT A.0(LISMCWS Figure 2-•8 1 Yk. 1 • 20 50 • 1 so 40 60 DEPRESSION 1 ELLIS 4 • 4 0 TO 1 7k . • 60 !) • r�F. 1y. ;:It t y" A�,t a. r -•,•1� , '��A C%4w � .a��r��"��.�,Zq .'.����'�;;• F;,�i t��1 "��� ���� ,����`� t� ��� r+�`�y��'t ����� J�X. �.�rz i 11 .�'�' �� �1�� ��?�� �r � '�1�� Y: � �1 � 1• K� � {'�, .1 `S tik �'Yt y, 5 1 �1,1 �+� 1 "1\i� �� '�� +f� o '� t �� � r ��,, ��, �� � �t� � �I� �t t U ;'S -•41�"1 . . . .� �� . t�r! .�K'F �',Yts. ' .to �� �� � � ;�a t, ��, •..: r �i,},• 4 �� j� �i H y .� s. ��ti��'�� � r, �1�4 ��1• r 3 i���+ °�1, �.. .�„�,��. �r ����, � .r1S ',. ♦ '' k ley j � t'� �ti..:+� ,� • !, t .�,�,. �i �'�,�f�i��j. 1, .rt• C.� 'c ` r't'f'.li,,y�� �� '�' ' t• �i"'�ti`" t a � ��4'�'c r �i: 11_, '��1•. ���1¢:�dr. �F;:wd 'i�+.�k �f alignment was topography of the area and avoid existing eoilxisting wells andtanks.is and wuld require eventually found which would avoid all existing p Pnment also lrx;ludes the the relocation of only one set of oil tanks. This alignment ar ra Vu , bridge over the topographic deprensian referred to In the preceding p a9 P alignment study was conducted, howeverr a new use In the time since the Ellis aligr be significantly impacted by tha has been established In the area which may signed l lease agreement with the proposed aUgnment. The City recently 9 th of Ellis Avenue. The stables will i Better Built industries Horse Stables ann acres of City-owned land °n the t3 669 feet west side of Galdenwese Sar treet, with the City and should be open for business be operating an a 20 y the surrounding land (Figure 2-10)• thissummer• In addition to the stables, the miles of horse trails marked y permanent fence railing s were developed trails were established with a $25,Oflt) Fedora �f 10 years.nd and Water grant wit The tra be maintained for a minimum the provision that they Avenue realignment would come ,within a few feet of,the established horseatrail The proposed Ellis A realignment southwest corner of the tripsaccles ommodat and ebothtthe Ellis AvsCit expense so In locations. In order to �, crossing. such hall and the horse trails, the trails would. the need.posed bridg d r Y that they cross Ellis Avenue only so relocatio n would be acceptable in terms Of grremalndericoftt tsoe:ncY ap dta efficacy, but could not be implemented until lots were acquired by tile C.ity. acts an lil aced Ellis Avenue realignment wouldnm�nts would kprobably have . i While the prop Central Park► the alternative all ti A�gn�erto�Talbert Avenue would u7his greater Impacts. Connecting southeast loapin9 arterial down around the south{'rr► 'edge of the lexistirig ' aUgnment would eliminate Cenf}nicis westral Park t a5treet, would cut through„lnn,l . corner of Talbert Avenue send mnasium on the vlrost side already leased to the YMCA�for constc the�Qtter 8ullt Horse Stab �u tse �� " of Goldenwcst Street, would cut through cross the,established horse trail in four locations and severely Imp Lnke Huntington• act an the The no-project alternative enuld7hi�vAltarnnttveewould l not trequire that t an existing and proposed pars us It arterial. it would, however, ect portion of Central Park be bisected by require a street crossing for Ihs proposed linear puck from Central Park and req arks. As mentioned pedestrians and equestrians to move between the two p st the d at tile foot Of earlier, if Edwards Street were rsalignewards Street remains oln the tlop of th'eae crossing would be on Ellis would be at Edwards Edwards street. bluf fs the street crossing Fiscal impact er the In anaiyxing the llternativs a{:gnrne f omiee{ch. important riastinstances, road ids construction costs ttx� City would i: cur r are I tailed by Improvementsxurbs, gu.tem, siaew%ilks, end landscaping owners when �►wir property Is developed and than affected private property property traversed by he he dedicated to the City- �ecand the majority fh of ppp tr versed by Ellis-Talbert alignment, and all of the property i r r • ` 4 •r i. x Y x �� ! a ? i .t � b •. IAtJRsl��t�y� 1 t,�•', � �1 Ra.iti•r14 ltar�. rr �'+� F-+>tj '�'1}'i`";"1 t +1�i' �_ + N �s ,ei, . n .,,.f -.91� i' �: q� , .�.r'L`. :�rr ' .E t ;}�''�ta < r" L+ y w;Y. i,r ii r•fv,�°,`• 1.', `ti z7 ,y6, L"}1tiirt'r t •.tt ..,t, lS;l:t�. �',4' .1 !• yt1 'j0.�b r` SN . 1�y ">Sh:7i�'r .�1"y t+ r?� -_ •'fry�IM i�' , ''al1(Y,,,,A7i,, Fi: I,I�rI„ 1•S>rV'.:!,,}J ' tY �• , :"_ .1 � (.11� st7� tS x ' a kr ,',5'y5s. F, �' xF:l susi ' '1,;�,1tR%1;iy ,3J t 2q j t 1 t i t t yeah 1.4 .. Y " r.. 1`{> t' 1 x ^Tf f� P r ���� �r.1� tc r ..� �. � J�^iy 5;'�:1"���61 yM"1.� '• y�k♦�>�. '�}:i.lY �7.;�r C` •;,t'��,5 1�r�[{ �t ; ..a`a{'r]:�t��,.�K.}�1�� 5:'. y. � ♦ ,i j 3'S!. `t L•i i Yi; .i�, > ;Fr _ r .e�'!3 L}' '4z��., F.�,lr ^r �. ',.l,' ' '1.1•••}.+`. �� �' {r�i. S ► ,s�'�`y. 3 :'.y(' } '7{(.�.:;:5!.13' 1 •q�•'.r y:;v}'�Nt .�Lz •', t t� ' }�:�r�:q.l '�•t'F:);7 �r �C'},,.} ...Zdi Z•.t`6k;,.rt e.4' r�r'r.x'tJ.t',•G Yi ;yr.,.,1� «L t a.�,Y y.4i.+�C t,�. ��' 4 f3`,.� ).u..� x ,41 ,�r�1 .� • +� y � �• �. * t t ;4k�F:t D/`?4'zi��'� x t i..K� } 4 „ a 4,)j� ���x�� a.+rl�«y�'{,: r'1K�r�s�,<��,4�.��rY.•^3L!� t'>•�� ,i '5���. '�i zx Pi _" rs. 1 ��,�t =t+Vti�}ii<►r��� 1�"ryr -!}�.f �r R. %jr .P�I�',"` + ,i`,�•.T k .��v #.ri� t�, �F;.q•..t �{ E. {.p ,� } y, ''� , ' �.�'�+•�. t1.��'��� i,, "�`4 may` �^3+ �. 7:i.'# 1�Y 'f" �y,..a:�{ 15, '?�..r, tF�lt`ati � it 1 y,�.V'\�i+.�a4'4i. \Rr� � "d`��;<{j•. 4r '14� •,�t::4•� 1.•�`a"�� 1�z jftul,4:{1 .x� r kk i `. �+), (}'y f�3,+� .1' � �• �,i! i'�` jr (ij 'Y 1 {� �' r S�4' 1� � .��`� ^� �1 .�x.w ,,, � 4�. ..r 4ry ;"+ �t'� pyt- "!#, �: .�t'• t, � . (,t`{ �4�7bP^� 4,'( Y`> �'A �(Ilj ik '- Yrj7''+) Y:��`{�x1 `M2^! f '.9 �,?.'1[ .1•{ : .i , '', },tj{, '7>i�s �''+` '";;'�� t': •�. •'tf ietl•;., �,'r'.�x< x �s 1«...ztT,i;` y�:. 1 i y �l :A 1 `• rtSl� lz l+i .1 "!. �•.4t� �� 1`. �� - : .1� �T,r,[••� •1;. ,. .f S It � • f h•. � +�'', ��41 �� ~!+�,.F,�'�g-^�" li t �"1 .l � 4.z �,J' 1,� "� t T. J' y lt 4 h ��.� �+t: 51i 1 .i. lr7? ' �•F\ �T'F�� �� e �• ,? 'j' �'F,z ( � !� , ii t t �:�1 >E f.��.���,1 F�F�' r 1�. � cl F�,.r.�; `�''�. i'� �. , i d�k� E,,.7 �' `�, "t` �`r:.' ►,, +F rilrFtJ�tx 1`ti'1ski. `'y.a5 �;. t; '1..j',G��`.`'t!^5 •�' ;tit,'� a, , .� rt.;4ktij'�1a'3�•1. hr�', r)�,'+4.�t. , +,j ` ;b� �ti •,,, l�♦.Ji• ��li.4Li' .t�1� Szltt�.�t,4t,i,rah� t�t'L:.a.'r�. �,)��wa4t�c::+lYirrYvL+r1: 'tdF'llSi.'��ezS1z.4'11�{• '��1 c , ;.: J, Y 'i � � rr r t ,����� it �',� ; �•' •�rrr u'+u;0.141111111 �i ��j+�r�l't '�I,I.I{111UI11 I�IIIII{Ift.' 'lllllllllilt 111111U{Ui -. . T Illillllfill uinnnppl ,ul lui�1 l�lili1 'lllUlilll��IUIUil111 U�itUl� 1_,.,u'fl�lllliilij� ' 'r 40 �fi111�Ci11il~ IU�11(ili ,'1�411�1111�1l1 III Ill : .; ,��; .- , �liU�lllll - Ullifllilf llill{I1�11l1 � . �i•fllllllll Y. '• tri,S� Y'wt�'�}�t '�t,i'!• ••'1�i,���~•ti tit} 7t}r'1.i�. .;fry' e 4 It eA �{������. 1, ff r;� �' j� !t ►,^tti a w �.r � };j', � ^=s��,`����4iy� ���� ���1���''�� � �� � '�� �� �� � ''r,����'r �1A S� ��t ri��i,�•�{ � . ` � 1;, �: � �,,�,,� € � �L�7 � ii} }h � � �.? ,S �� 1'�j 1 •�t'�ti`l.K '� �� 1�! � r. �' ':rk Y�^.+� '� y•'jt, , i�'�i }�! ,�� .t tI1�� �. ,.!X C,� �. � l� `�• rS.t.•} � � ,''!'i [ � , .��, l', � �S "'� �� �.f:f t,•ri`, ,l�1 �t tt� .�`>"� (�'���I�i' ' 1 1 1 � T•, �r �'� �`�` " ���,�"{' '1 �, �'� t' '�'. �•i,,$�, i .•� i, 1 � 3d>ti lT��y \i '� t. 3�. � ' �ti\4j� S � �� 1{.''� ,. �'� , .r' • y '! 3s�,�+ { y ,� L.r 'a �', y'i r � �t.�Qy' 'e {[[;- '�j tt ,\`�� Y V^j l��� }/Q 1 f � �� l''��!`{yr�1� 1�d\. � �� + � • �• , -Il ii!l�� �3•f Y'�. '� yy"SSS " ► '> 'i7r{�71 �. .. 1 .4,. *L.. .r. .. ! OFFF T iF ,, �. .r y \�`� •t �, "t �tlk� �� '�;t�.'r i"'�'r�y `1 C '^� $,• t '1 �' �'1 � '� X � "•. � A .� '�`, � �,4`�4 �!} ;�, ,i � ;.`��+'t` "M��iiy i`�4/ ♦•b#.}. � �� 1 rt� ;j'�, �f �. ,. `�i \ .��. t�,+ 4 i �i• A'• .' i'� P � . v"y��; : p��'3}.. +;�SM� �• �� . i' � -� C' c` . �* 'j�,. Ili '�+t f i 4 •. .r �. l• +''''��� . � �'a �. ''�t ,,t ��,� ` ��t" r i ti i .�1► .y e .M=i '��x� ., h''yS �iw,1�.t'�'• V' t. y'a :t .15•r 4, X N w� irY { ti, i _ Talbert-Talbert alignment, Is ovined by the City, the City would Incur the cost of all .improvements on its properties. The City Department of Public Works has prepared cost estimates for the three alternatives. The estimates include right-of-way acquisition, slope easements, highway Improvements, additlonal dirt work, street lighting, traffic signals, pedestrian/horse crossings, sewer and water. Of, the three alternative alignments, the Talbert-Talbert connection would be the most. expensiva at approximately $4.13 million In 1983 dollars. - .The Ellis-Talbert connection would be substantially less expensive at,approximately $2.32 million. The no-project alternative would not be Inexpensive, -with `the total cost of upgrading the existing Ellis Avenue and Edwards Street alignments to secondary,arterial standards estimated at $3.05 million with an ndditionnl $0.9 million required If Edwards and Ellis Intersect at the base of the bluff. it must be noted,. however, that tmlike the Talbert-Talbert and Ellis-Talbert alteinatives, a substantial portion of the costs of upg" mdlrxj Ellis and Edwards In the no-project alternative would be borne by adjacent proparty owners. In order to be consistent, the cost projections prepared by Public Works assumed all costs for all alternatives to be boma by the City. i , While discussing the above qualification, mention should also be made regarding ,r other.' qualifications concerning the cost estimates. , The estimates are necessarily-rough. To be able to refine the estimates would require extensive study for each .alignment. Consideration would need to be given to property ' lines, right-of-way appraisals, right-of-way exchanges, existing . street Improvements, business relocations, all wells, obligations to construct, ' topography, desired standards, adjoining' property use, utility. requirements, " traffic Impacts, etc. Because of the generalizations which were necessarlly made regarding these concerns, closer analysis may significantly affect the projected right-of-way and ct,netruction costs. ; Environmental Effects }; The proposed'reaUgnment of Ellis Avenue will significantly'Increase the amount of traffic on.this arterial between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets. Slmllarly, ' the connection of I Talbert to Talbert would also result In additional traffic on Talbert Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street and of course between Goldenwest and Edwards Streets. While an incroaso In local traffic volumes will occcur, either one of the two alignments Could be expected to F reduce uverall vehicle miles 'traveled city wide which could have a beneficial Impact on air quality. The no-{project alternative, on the other hand, would result In little additional local traffic, but would likely Increase overall vehicle miles traveled city wide. The two realignment alternatives would be accompanied by noise Increases on those streets. By realigning Ellin Avenue to intersect with Talbert Avenue, .the roadway would ` be placed closer to the Aolsa-Fairview Fault and a probable peat locatirn in the vicinity of Edwards Street, which may have long term effects on the cost of maintaining the arterial due to subsidence, cracking, etc. While the precise alignment remains to be resolved, It is likely that a change in the area's i . I 1 : -IZ- • J � SP �[Ts 4y�lASKu� � n re )), ml �q�P 'E (. ^Y ttf .'�1 I!`l. TI r Y rt ai � '.\ ,;�Y �'`�1•[t, 5�i t4 ! f�'+ •ij '-� L��'•. ta•�'.+t;�'�� r�f�'4,��4 } �!!i°t�tr+M+e�:: ,ai-. �{,.fit: f �t y�+ ii + ,: r. L"rt�3,1 1( � t i.,X' 1 1p :ad :. xf {�{`7 Zr tf, i .,h� t t t .rtl^3y� t:�4� \f#`l ..i. y tt? •1 x'ui;F; r ,' 4�l t, r � Y �l '; {11 c �. r.. �4;L. ( t� ��t��•l; :�� �;,���' '�',,�' ;�j��t r ."F.��C7T.t t .'Ctr��`'�r� L%1��,,��A}A� } ` �'tt• •'�' E�f".,fFr::f�� �r' ��Yf't ta.,-t+1+'n k`1`i,Z,., S r{4r�j• ��! 'kN ¢�,f a ,r \� �'�' r 1ta. t,\.�, :;� ., tE1} 1 H ,, �� ��. 1 M i'�)S�J�>. �;t t a��,�-aYL ,r,�1 .r. -�� •�}' S�._k,. �\�. b•'a 1'( .,�,)i ra�Cx�: i +:�,,},V �i;�fiS: }tr��� '{gip�' �� i.� ��. "t��•Lt-'4a3�\s�',,�y�,} .}t "��A�E.r L�[\'��„r1';�`'"l ��'•. t !r. �„t,�,�r7�. �+/t�;tf,.,;4 'F"i.�j�2•,w, f? �.�,kl' ,�.�'1l f i., r+ P, �. ','y,` !"j.�.7'<t' r kits i•: � u`n�'v� J" {,� ,` tit.'='"''".{.1RMt :L�;- l [';�y�a •';t�t IS':aA, �' '1,}'�r�1. Y`ti,, .i 1S�r �••:r Jf ys�,�,.,�i��+�1 ���•. i ,�.z g F 'l, t+F a';F tr{t, t �"t it 1�'�,' 4, ��`'` rr"1f:'r-e�`; �st4��g-.• � ,i�� �x. ,�4Y°� � '6 �, ..4S,es; ,r!Z,�•;, ., �.-. �c[,„} { ° 't.# .�., '1�»�,t;tj\��1vgC?�. � ,.� '�l�.k� }�;t k:. -, °;�i3�.�$'�"�'r�,��t�•. ,.��� r":;1�� '�"r'a '�.a�:� �;'. \+.`1 sr 5S� xa ,c,; . .� ,� \ �•r.�.�' ti'r�3 �;� ,t p},,"�';�..� {~ y. �,t+»ell x +r.' t"'�f , {�.. � �fi.� i,�y>~., "S�l� 4, �� +`a 1" �• 1. � l��� !r^`j r .\Y'.�1`����-•i-�•w Y�i4� ����{S,S r`,[r1,,S+�'� .,z+i''�y,3{a f�'1�` � i �,o;Ff M11{�'�+i4. �,�1 �'f,'i'+���.y� ��� 5�k� -4x�r' t�•�•t �� i t t °t �,�1 �,•.w;�Jt."���'3,:+ F;�#�'tji..�»'!."��?.trail��S;�tttt.`ei�E:;,�r�i� �����`�X�'�t•pr�Vj� �1;S t;�.�.}�x1.,a +'l�d�."1+•��'t� 1'ib a�13,.}�t•� a .�.�,!.p '� ����`��f�� 7�.'� «'�i rr ,+. ♦. � ,d.r' r+ �. . v k r} �.�.X11:Pa:d �1f �••. t .f., fat.lrV.��.,.'tF*. r { topography would be neaded to accommodate the roadway. The grade of the propozed roadway may alter erosion of the bluff and could affect runoff patterns Into Huntington Lake In Central Park. If planned properly, however, the roadway could take advantage of the scenic view potential of the blufftop area. The Talbert-Talbert connection would also be offected'by the Bolan-F ilrview Fault and the probable post location near Edwards Street. It would also crosu the old County dump site at the southeast corner. of Talbert Avenue.and Goldenwest Street. . Because the entire alignment would be at the base of the bluff, however, topographic changes would be minimal and erosion of the bluff w661d riot be a likely consequence. The close proximity of the Talbert connection to Lake Huntington would significantly reduce the ambiance of'the lake and the surrounding area. In terms of archaeological sites, the proposed Ellis,.-.Avenue`realignmenk 'Is preferable to the existing alignment west of.the existing Edwards Street, which passes through two archaeological sites,.ORA 82'.'and 880 as it descends the bluff Into the Bolsa Chica area. The Ellis-Talbert realignment may affect_a portion of ORA 82, depending upon the precise.:alignment adopted should that alternative be' selected. As a mitigating measure, the extent of this + archaeological deposlt.should be retained at the time of construction to oversee any grading activity In the vicinity of the archaeological site. Tha.Talbert-Talbert .connection.,would run through, p,partlon of ORA 142, a destroyed'archaeological I site on the west.side of Goldenwest Street at .Talbert Avenue. The'Talbert-Talbert alignment may also affect the same portion of ORA 82 as the mills-Talbert alignment and as such, the same mitigating measures should apply. Until a precise plan of alignment I3 prepared for the selected alternative't the extent of environmental,impacts Is Boni pwhat;.speculgtive. whilo' general areas of concern have beer-'Identified, specific Impacts should be analyzed In greater detail when precisely planning the propoeed realignment of Ellis Avenue- 2.1.3 Recommendation Staff recommends that the Ellis-Talbert alignment be selected with Ellis. Avenua designated as a primary arterial. This would allow the street to function .at primary, arterial volumes as projected by the Transportation Demand Model as well as ensure adequate right-of-way for on street parking and a bike trail. The Talbert-Talbert alignment Is seen as tieing lass desirable ' both In terms of Impact on land uses and cost of construction. Thu no-project alternative is not desirable because the City's Circulation Plan would remain Inconsistent with that of the County's. Emergency vehicle resoonse In the vicinity would remain poor and the eventual alignment of Ellis Avenua down the bluff to connect with Edwards Street would be awkward. e 1 -13- fl-Lr.'ty+fir•—,4•... . . . ..... ., � r I i r' t � ` T r' 2.2 Gothard Street Saith of Ellis Avenue 2.2.1 Background Tn;s amendment'item'coneoms'.the`event'ueI Alignment bf Gothard Street south of;Eiiis' Avenue and the'caniiectlon'of Gothard Strut to,Main -Street. It has 'bei}n 'recognlzed: for Many years that the ,existing 'location'.of th© southern sgmcnt of,,., Gothard Street with.�the me;dr "S" curve, grade . change and fivis•logged lnte'rsection with Main Sttvet undesirable. In jinswer'to. thes6'�problems, the.Circulation Plan.Was. amended 'In` 1976• to Indicate Gothem, Street. as a secondecy arterlai curving;w' iih ast'ier than east, South of Ellis Avenue and'connecting'to'Garfield Avanuv'vla Crystal Street and continuing`.from Garfleid. Avenue to.,Pacific ` Coast I-Gghway.,as a primi ry arterial via Seventeenth.Street. This alignment was, telected.at, the-same time ' when Main Street between`.Gorfieid Avenue and Yorktown Avenue'-.was deleted and Lake Street connscted between Yorktown and Garfield. The Intent wen to provide two north-south'Arterials In addition to Goldenwest Street, which would ; provide accenA to the downtown area. f In 1979, however, Lake Street between Yorktown and Garfield Avenue Yms � doleted from the Circulation Element Plan. This deletion reafflrmed Main Street between Yorktown and Garfield Avenues as an Important connector to the downtown and Civic Center araa. With the deletion of Lake ! Street, It to Important to re-evaluate the alignment of Gothard Street and its connection to Main Street as well .as the primary arterial designation south of Garfield Avenue. t. The area of concern within which alternative alignments will be analyzed Is bounded by Ellis Avenue to the north, the Pacific Electric Railroad to ti:a cast, Main Street and Clay Avenue to the south and Goldenwest.Street to the west. The General Plan designation in the area north of Garfield Avenue Is primarily _14_ ham+.�. • ...r..a. ...• �. •� t•. - �• .icy ♦( .. ..t ,.... ,... .. av J::'h. ,. .. ... ..« .. ,.. . .. .. A •. ..rr 4•, .r,... ... .. v .... • ....a.4... .. •.a3.. r. ax.\Ser.N..rWI'.Yw.wV�[(` 1 4 t y1 II t 4i ... t ;s� Z zt �• v 4� n i a +l' Y � General Industrial with some estate residential between Ernest And Ellis Avenues. The zoning Is a combination of MI-01 R5 and RA-0. South of Garfield Avenue, the General Plan designation Is medium density residential and 'the zoning' lirludes RA-G, M1 and R2. Zoning and land uses will be further examined In the analysis that follows. 2.2.2 Analysis Three alternative allgnments of Gothard Street south of Eills:Avenue will be Examined (Figure 2-11). Alternative 1 Involves a slight modification of {the existing developed alignment of Gothard Street connecting witit Main Street and Garfield Avenue. Alternative 2 Is the current Circulation Plan alignment of Gofrd Street with Crystal Street to connect with Mein Street In the vicinity'of'Clay Avenue. Alternative 3 is the realignment of Gothard Street with Holly Street to connect with Main Street south of Garfield Avenue. -All three 'of the alternatives feature Gothard. Street as a secondary arterial$ although discussion of possible upgrading of some sections will be discussed where appropriate. Thi9;sectlan°arialyxea'the effects of the altemative Gothard Street: alignmonis on(1),cir6latlon patterns In the.Immediate.area and actress:the City,Including existing'and prolected traffic 'vo'lumeel�(2) reap obsi a..capsbilitles of the City's fire and paramedic crews, (3) existing and future land uses In the area, (4) fiscal � Impact, and(5) environmental quality. Circulation t As noted In the .background section, Gothard Street has been intended 'to L function as a north-south arterial connecting to Seventeenth Street wi►ich"would larva,es-an alternative to Goldenwevt Street; f3�ech Boulevard 'and Lake Street in•provtdirg � access to the Civic Center* and Downtown area..`'.Wlth the tel bf Main Street Inplace of Enka Street, howevar, Gothard Street is presently'Indlcated an the Circulation Plan`whl merge with Maln'Street In ' the viclnity of Clay Avenue. Since any alternative alignment of Gothard Strout will also necessarily tie either directly or indirectly into Main Street, It Is. Important to select an alignment which _will provide the safest and most efficient connectiart. The existing developed alignment of Gothard Street south of Ellis Avenue to connect with Main Street and Garfield Avenue has proven to be bath Inefficient end dangerous. The portion of roadway under study Is, approximately 2,850 feet Iona with mi average width of 25 feet and la characterized by a me)or "S" curve along with several'grade changes. The roadway b striped with a single double 3• yellow centerline and has no curbline, but Is cloarly defined by edge of pavement. Though there are warning signs In advance, of the curves in addition r. to signs at the curve for both directions of travel, this section of roadway has en unusually high accident rate. In 1900, according to the Departiment of Public Works, the midblock accident rate was 14.24 accidents per million vehicle miles ?r travelled, no opposed to•1.21 City wide. Existing traffic volumes on this section of Gothard Street are 6,DOU ADT. $, P g. E A �t w i •i'. � �`� �. .1 ,flu i � � �4 � f 1 A,iQt? R Re "�� � � Yus I Y [r•p �, 1— .___.. r- - . f 1 M. 'i f•"'Q 1Ii:.11U.U1 (�a-��i 1. J. ' . r Rk." - r .� �r.� n•�� �' .} i q,t. GARFIELD` iS' J � r •�j '•.t - . ` t �: ` j� ;� UL YORKTOCF- �� _ CF•E '�t l,''�tt1� . i �.•;,..- ,.Y.�., CF•n pa, nil .�l.l.il^ 41 ��,� � � f•4r i r iillk ��- .� r'•: l _ ��� ���:� ���4�,.� w�J.j�r,•—•. 1':7'•1,T►"a L�l7 • •'�'.l Y � 1� r��� . • 1 a "83 'EXISTING STREET do•• HOLLY AI.IGNMW-, m m- CRYSTAL ALI6NMENT 2.2 COTHARD STREET- Figure 2--11 JI � � y r r ►7 f� r F M ` s 4 � •k �� 1.• 't� 1 f ,t � � � ' , ti. ;{• �. .� e t t rt � f, 'ij ` � T `• ' , � t� s � r1 .W f�� ... 1!w'�. .4s a .ti^.�� ._1._ ]� _ � �:?�S,� �ti •'; �SZIs Stil � c. _. ., , I The Intersection of Gothard Street with Main Street and Garfield Avenue Is a flue-legged offset intersection. Garfield Avenue Is an east-west arterial, while Main Street is oriented In a northeasterly direction. At present, the intersection Is, experiencing an average daily traffic entering volume of 25,000 vehicles,.with the largest concentration of traffic occurring along Main Street. This'le attributable to the fact that Main Street Is a'direct connecting link from beach Boulevard to the Civic Center. facilities and to the Downtown area. Though 'the accident rate of 1.24 accidents per million vehicles entering the Intersection is not high, the delay In traffic movement associated with ,the five-legged nature of the Intersection Is highly Inefficient In terms of traffic flow. The necessary additional traffic signal sequences result In excessIV61y Jong vehicle Idling times and the vast size of the intersection requires unusually !; long travel times through the Intersection. ` The proposed realignment of Gothard Street with either Crystal Street (Alternative 2) or Holly Street (Alternative 3) would eliminate the problems is associated with the existing five legged Intersection. If the Crystal, Street alignment is' selected, Gothard Street.-would connect to Main Street in,'the vicinity of Clay Avenue. This Intersection with Main Street would be a distance of approximately 2,OOO .feet from the Intersection of Main Street and Garfield Avenue. . Since the Transportatloh,:Dem`a' id Model:, as dlscussed.. later In: this analys3s' projected eubstantlal traffic -volumes on Main Street In this area,, a traffic'signal at Main Street and the realigned,connectlon with Gothard Street would, likely be required. The distance of .2,000 feet between intersecttans ` should be adequate to prevent backup of traffic from one Intersection to the other. If the Holly Street alignment Is selected, Gothard, Street would connect to Maln 4.; Street only 800 feet from the intersection of Garfield Avenue and Main Street. Since the projected traffic volumea for Main Stceot with the GotI4n'id-CrystAt '4 alignment would also apply ,wlth.the Gothard-Holly. alignment, a't'raffie signal would also be. required. While,800 feat between Intersections Is less desirable then`2,IZO0 feet, the potential problem of traffic beck-up between intersectlons 4` could be avoided through careful synchronization of the traffic signals. The*altornative Crystal and Holly alignments would also result In the need for i' traffic signals. where those streets. cross Garfield . Avenue since the #: Transportation Demand Model also projected substantial traffic volumes' on ! Garfield Avenue both to the east and west of:Crystal.and Holly'Stmets. The Crystal alignment would result In a signalized Intersection approximately 1,200 r feet from tho Main-Garfield intersection, while the Holly alignment would result In a traffic signal only 700 feet from Main Street and Garfield Avenue. Thig Holly Street-Garfield Avenue Intersection would also be only 600:feet from the Holly Street-Main Street intersection to the south. The Gothard-Holly j. alignment then, would result In a much tighter triangle of traffic signals than would the Gothard-Crystal alignment. r While the Holly Street alignment would result In only one street crossing ! (Garfield Avenue) between Ellis Avenue and Main Street, the Crystal Street alignment would additionally Involve soma type of crossing or Intersection with Clay Avenue. As stated earlier, the connection of Gothard-Crystal Street with �. Main Street would be depicted an the Circulation Plan as It presently is with a i , R ' , 11! ! -16- I � {y; t i 1p1 � ,♦' Y i ♦ ; ' I + t � L � } g M41 IAA t S t , ,,, straight line which becomes 17th Street (or Gothard Street as Identif led on the Plan). In reality, however, the connection would be precise planned, to tie Into Main Street somewhere between Clay and Yorktown Avenues. Alternative precise plans for the conneclon would be for the street to "Y" Into Main Street just north of Yorktown Avenue, "T" Into Main Street just south of Clay Avenue or bend Into Main Street at Clay Avenue. Each praclea plan alternative would require some treatment of Clay Street to avoid undesirable cross traffic. Clay;Avenue Is an east-west local collector street one mile in length`between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street. Current traffic volumes on Clay Avenue are isstimated .at only, 2,500 ADT and -there are no'. traffic. slgnals located at any of the Intersections. If Gothard-rCrystai`Is precise planned to connect to Main.Street at Clay Avenue,,then ,,Clay Avenue, should either be signalized, barricaded or abandoned. If. Oath ard-Crystal;Is preclse`ptanned to connect to MFaIn Street;at,Clay Avenue then Clay _Avenue should probably be abandoned between Gothard-Crystal and Goldenwest Streets. It Is,significant to note that because of the extremely undesirable`nature of the Intersectlon of Clay Avenue and Goldenwest Street, consideration' has already been given to either barricading Clay Avenue or signalizing It to reduce usage. Apart from intersection and signaiizatIan consldaratinns, the canfiguratlnn:of ' the, mid-block alignment Is also an Important.issue. One:of: the reasons •for onatying alternative Gothard Street alignments Is to ciliminate or: reduce the undesirable 'IS.' curve characteristic'of the existing developed alignment. If the existing developed, alignment of,Gothard Street Is retained, tho'115" curve Itself would be modified by a minor shifting of Gothard Street' to the west. This f would smooth out the curve and possibly reduce the mid-block accident rate somewhat. The Gothard-Holly alignment would eliminate:' the 5 curve entirely and would resialtln"the shortest and most dlract'alignment between`Ellis Avenue and Mi n Street. . This straight alignment would be the"most desirable design ;from, an engineering standpoint and would also 'reduce the mid-block accident rate to a level more consistent with City-wide rates. The•Gothard-Crystal alignment would Incorporate a:gentle 5 typo curve from Ellis Avenue`to.Crystal.Street., While this configuration.Is less desirable than a straight line, the proposed curvature is sllght ,enough that moat problems associated with the existing developed 115" curve may bo avoided. The Transportation Demand Model was utillied.to project traffic volumes In the area In the year 1995. .Since all three alternative alignments were assumed to have similar future volumes, only the Gothard-Crystal alignment.was run on the model. Additionally, An order for the same run to .be applied to more alternatives,.the Gothard-Crystal alignment was also assumed to "T" Into Main Street at Clay Avenue rather than connect In a "Y" south'of Clay. As shavin in Figure 2-12 Gothard Street between Ellis and Garfield Avenues was projected to carry approximately 13,900 ADT In 1995, The realigned section of Gothard -17- ' •!Y4.•wrYwct ...... _ ... ... .. .. ,1. ,. . :.,_;.. w .rr-«......r+.... .. .r..._-,.... ,. .........«r...r,:n....tr r 1 J"-t:r't,a..r.+:.-..r...v,,.wy d WA 1141 t i r r. X 4 ELLIS ■ a bARFIELD R00 CLAY •r .f • 4� Y • rr.•i # iat 0 r irA a y.x,4y �1y♦ 12 ?' 75 h '�k WO �r�,.ytis, }�}�i��•�ril *� ti ,► ,,ti! r',� r. •I�1i� Ttt y` 1,R�� 1�{ '� r r {, a. • i ,�; r'�Y rs `1 '' t ► 1��t :r; �5, ��+ r i t SA �A` �}� 1„ .r 11 A f �!�r�.1• � ��•I(S t,}�3�'�� 11� r ��� y ,� � '�1�� � t �� � tr �( � ! t r 4��1 !,� �•1 1 rr1�``"f ,, y. ♦,.,�\�:j,}h 7ia� ��'�`f� � f�[�� �`,`4� +.'a` t � � 1ri a'���' � .+ � � �l t.',' r 't'.� ���,. � � `A d�tr2� ,t :�. `.111`\ V 'V :,` I"! t i: ' 4 t l i JI r;j.} t }• '- 1 +�,��. '11 'iL 1, �� � �!� �'k. 't'��4 •�'�`iy� '`1 i �`� �'t,� �' • � ���:1�� �,1 . ,e t ��i�, I�t �;. ,Sf�{y� '��,W+���' �},,'��}�jt � Kr ,Ncr�k�.. 1 ,t�� ��••� + a�F r'�... �' � � ��1 � �t� �*i �� T.� �� � t �r Lva- Wit is. :! 7ti •;i r i 1 „Z;i , y4����' � l �, . ,� �� r �, t1 f Q'i:�a 1 �•.�� '�[�5' a �. r� � __ �1.. Street between Garfield Avenue and Mein Is projected to curry 24,700 ADT. These numbers Indicate that the southern most section of the realigned Gothard Street would be used to a large extent by traffic moving from Main Street to Garfield Avenue and vice versa. The projected 24,700 ADT on Gothard Street south of Garfield Avenue would place Gothard Street at the F level of service if developed as a secondary arterial and at the B level of service If developed as a primary. The present Circulation Plan Indicates this section as a primary arterial. The projected volume of 13,900 ADT on Gothard Street north of Garfield Avenue would allow this section of Gothard Street to function at the A level of service If developed as a secondary arterial. In addition to projecting traffic volumes on Gothard Street, the Transportation Demand Model also u projected traffic volumes an Main Street and Garfield Avenues. The model projected 29,200 ADT ..on Main Street south of the realigned Gothard Street Intersect.lon and-19,400 ADT on Main Stre' et.north of that point. The model also projected 33,200 ADT on Garfield Avenue west of the realigned Gothard Street.and 28,158 ADT east of Gotheird.Street. As noted earlier, these relatively high traffic volumes Indicate that traffic signals will-tier necessary .where Gothard Street, whether aligned with Crystal Street or. Holly Street, Intersects .both Garfield ,Avenue, and Main�;Street. ' The numbers`"also lndicate that the principle movement. of -traffic along the 'Garfield Avenue-Gothard Street-Main Street exchange will be to and from the.Bolsa Chico Street extension via,Garfleld.Avenue to the east of Gothard Street and to and from;the downtown area .via Main Street to' the south of Gothard Street. These'traffic patterns would seem to indicate that the Crystal Street alignment would be more desirable than the Holly Street alignment because Crystal Street would constitute a more direct path between Use two destinations. Emergency Service Response The"fire station"Alch will be'most Impacted by:tho Gothard Streot'reslignmont Is. the.station,an the- west side oU.,Gothard ,Street, 600 fact, north. of Ellis Avenue. Principle southerly travei from 'thie:station Is along'Gothard Street to Main Street into the Civle,Center and northeast Downtown area. The Fire Department supports aollminAtion of the existing developed alignment of Gothard_ .Street through adoption of either the Holly. . or , Crystal Street alignments. The existing ."S" curve Is viewed as extremely undesirable .for emergency response vehicles to negotiate at high speed and the five-legged Intersection, at Main Street results In delays In getting vehicles onto Main Street from Gothard Street. Because of the straight line configuration of the Holly Street alignment; the Fire Department is most in favor of this alignment. They have also Indic.-.Lad, however, that.the. Crystal Street alignment could be endorsed If the necessary "S" curve on this alignment Is smooth enough and If Clay Street is treated In a manner which will eliminate conflicts with traffic on that street. These Issues would be resolved through preparation of the precise plan of street alignment for the Gothard-Crystal alignment. •18- ' 1 1 • / V9141v t �' t .r a �� � � it i , •y tUri3.r� 1+ ` � �I, r'�. „s i'.` ��j',�P ��,`+�j t �" } �`�" '�, a ��� �a�1��'�'��: ;} r �ti;�• ,y �YytS$ " ` ` '•� ' ��. �jj q Q" i. }�.! n �� ` � + � �i 1 S'��.�, �?q R �LY ( +�.�. i +•31.,,.�'�1' u is`i �,.. . ,fir � . ���_ li' � � _ � •�ri��. � � • ,. Land Use The ultimate configuration of Gothard Street between Ellis Avenue and Main Street,;. may have • a significant impact on future land uses In that area. P,resently, approximately 75 percent of the area bounded by Ellis Avenue, Gothard Street, Garfield'Avenue and Goldenwest Street is designated General Industrial in the.General Plan. The portion that Is not Industrial Is.designated Estate Residential. This area, bounded by Ernest Avenue, Goldenwest Street, Ellis Avenue and a line extending south from Ellis Avenue to Crystal Street Is Included in the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan for equestrian oriented Estate Residential uses. If'the.Crystal Street allgrimEnt.of. Gothard Street Is selected,' It Is likely.that the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan area would be extended to;,meet that alignment. „While this would slightly extend residential zoning,In`the„araa, It would also presorvo a large developable Industrial area., It shauld.be' poked here, however, ,that there Is some debate regarding' where.'ihe southern:terminus of the Gothard Industrial Corridor should be. If Ellis Avenue Is ultimately.selec:ted as the,. southern terminus ,for Industrial uses, . then the Gothard-Crystal ,alignment would not only serve as a logical boundary far the Ellis=Goldenwest Specific Plan area to the west, but would also preserve a large unbisected Brea fer more Conventional residential development to the east. if, the,., e'icisting developed alignilii6nt of Gothard ;Street is retained, .the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan boundary.will likely remain where It Is. ::51m1lor to:the Gothard-Crystal 'Street.alternative, selection'of the' existing developed Gothard'Street alignment would preserve a large sunb lie ctsd area suitable for j Dither,industrial or residential development depending upon the'declslon''mods i {{} regarding the southern terminus of the Industrial corridor. i Unlike,the .two .proceeding alternative alignments, the`Gothard-Molly, Streit alternative,would not as effectively'proserve' a'resldenNal i"p"doi i for the area Ill-*of Crystal Street. Bisecting this area with an arterial would legve two f approximately 600 foot wide strips of`land on either side Hof the roa'dway. .This resulting';land,area;configuration .would,'permit development..of four 19, acre Industrial parks similar to those developed north of Ellis Avenue.',,The narrow strips of land' would be less'condueive .to residential 'development, however. t Selection of the Gothard-Holly alignment may .essentIelly confirm the City!s present designation of Garfield Avenue as the southern terminus of the Gothard t Industrial Corridor. Another I&. " rise Issue which neade'to be addressed Is the future development of the"The Rut, ". © 550 unit condominium'project south of Clay Avenue and east of Main Street. 'rinciple access to this project will be' taken via Clay Avenue approximately 9U- • nt east of Main Street. This will tend to Increase the Importance of Clay E �nue between Beach Boulevard and Main Street as a local collector. Projected traffic volumes or, ?v Avenue from "The Ranch" project Indicate that a traffic signal at Mair, ^t and Clay Avenue may eventually be warranted to facilitate traffic mu. A to end from Clay Avenue. Because of this necessity, the Gothard-Crystaa iment and Its resultant signalized ' Intersection at Main Street and Clay �+, nllm may appear more desirable. Alterr-3tively, traffic between Main Street or, ' �y Avenue could utilize Holly Street to the north and the resultant traffic u�l, r ,nt Main Street and Holly Street if the Gothard-Hotly alignment Is selected. _1 g_ t y r A k �•.. fiz l ' �fj�ri'�' t `�k,r '� r,�5 t x � r L �' rt' �:t ' r .�'�4�t;r�rt��.i'��,�"��3�'y,y�'��.� `�,�},•�K� ��;a yrj�!•�ti' a ; �, # � ��. Tis��,,. .� .{ i 5 .}�ty�*`.�i . �. jr y'y�(�;'a �' `}y y, ?4,. � �1 te? p � 4'�;xti vt 1 Y�r. +` {�t � '{�"���Q i*�' `�,{° �,�, ti�°,•as� ..�'� �ji ,' `.i�,��� z y.�4 + i�� .}�.1,� •I . i `� ' 1 i� � �-�' r �' ! r ��� ' �'�{{{ ' +��ZP' .. a1 �' / •li� �. . 5"'� � .Y�� � � � �•r" d y � � ..c ( {3gr .S� ' j",. C Y",, '.z t ty ��i ��'!'`� '. 1�1.. .4�L'''1��i111. �.4� •w,iye �� yy� T���jlt4 •'..� lr!i,�.rF � XhS': 't}�. i In terns of street dedication requirements, the three eiternative alignments ` acts• ir, order to u'�grode any' of the would have substantially differencit,gtreott Holly Street and Crystal Street) to affected streeta (existing would need to secondary arterial Standards an additional 40 feet of right-of-dda eloped Gothard be taken along those streets. Modifsly, m the involve shif roadway ting the Street allgnmen4 as nnted previouslY to the west and would not result In any egtonsion of the streat eauth of slightly Garfield Avenue. nmcr;ts would extend Both the Crystal Street and Holly 5trev �laagn p mpey ,owner;hips and land south of Garfield Avenue and throughgest, It he usue._ Since the `Gad,a;dZrystaf Street aiignrnent: wois difficult tit a precisely would"requlre the most additionol street de a however, because et been .determine street dedication Impa t on ct alongei her. Crystal 'Or ar Holly Street determined whether, street ould be taken evenly from each aide of th of tthetHo�YfStreet alignments ; w t entirely from one side (4. feet).' in t cask ; axisti 34 ..unit apartment c niplez an -tile fromtth*eat side.of,ofr the We- airs that 'all'dedication be to 1 protiAbly,req . Tlifs requlroment woo! which is largely vacant except far an auto repair givap. further tighten up 'the three Intersectim xrl angle "aseoci©tad with the t Gothard-Holly Street sslignment and Garfield Avarua sod Mein Street. street dedication issue with Crystal Street 16re vas the possibility ' e re` aired from as many as 2a 'different property owners s The principle , that dedication may, b q An an area where the ultimate land user.have The Gan ra'Planirdesignatn along may not develop for a humbcr of Ysg Residential.,.:and �r Crystal Street south of Garfieldxis Existing uses on either ldaVenue to MiMsdium sof the street Include zoning is RA:o with some M equipment storage o an a 'cafe, an sofa i'eP air`Shop, all wells .and all producllan equip , facllittcs. st North of Garfield Ave au tire eCye:on the c�n9 nt gcenter ide of�The General at Street iPlan auto,,wrecking storage .ygrd.'gnd ; deaignatiari is General'Industrlei and the t mixed malry9tlnnllarmirig and portlah�at RA-O. The multiple r wnersh Us, r, usca_and the'ezpectedlY tempi RA-t] zoning are indicators non-con farming nis to determine aPprvpriRte land ono that„the area will undergo future ansly the } dealghations and will probably net davelopn uciionu f Gothard 'StrOOt via -future. If the City wished to expedite Crystal Street, these conditions .'Indicate that tf ana hartivl would be proceoding3 may be necessary to obtain rlght..Qf-vreY dedicated as a condition of development at a rnuch later data. Flsca! 1m act The Department of Pubo- Works has prepared coat of onst ucti rl�[kaf way for the three Gothard S4reot a119hwPnt improvements, additional earth work, R ' acquisition, elope easements, hig signals, street lighting, sawor, wL-tor and culvert& Of the three oltcrnativcs, the Gothard alignment in projected to be the most omen wslva at approximately �2.57 million In �983 dollars, Thre Elils-I-Io11y alignment would PP , _20- mm � r :z 4 , lay l �, �Y'`��}�s;��y1'Ev.�.'f4�. �t`' t,y�►., 1�i ��,� ` 4t, �i� ''�;��*�`i����'� •°i �'t�' St����t��t � t�7t� �".ttL1�t + # �•3:`t��� {a!{{. �i' ..f •�• _ s,Y `lj gni '�: �, � � '� +;, t c �"'� ��4•• � G. .� /'i4 � ,.. ,� i y��° � t��N��itil<�'�.��y�y{{�} =� t Nf .���,�a 1 11�� � �,x�{' ��' •��',.'� �. ��t4;, �itl. a �� � ��;"� ' ,,N 4stY 4 (!�� � �.t�� ,� i �I r2 �#a4 �a7� Y��tf #k�`�u,d+`e,a 0 i`'�,r�i(cI±� `i '� ,� � i.��h,��a Y���'".�)� �..`."� #.� ,� 4t��• :��h�i,4„ .1• .„��a�. 4} ,t,t"t•� iy^k.�, .r,� F. � � +1`j�� yi `y���• i� .� ��,b'l *���y+, �;� �i�ys � �'t�"(�.�- �,�:r;• �,•�! �44� ,�k �_,}� ` l}4 �1k '{'F'�j�t. :e�T � ��?,�: � 1� y.. �r S� '?ark¢ S �!r � 'a t j 1\^�. 1 � S„!1#.''t 1 t�„ �<��� , I� ►� � , t� �7 � j fi` 4 r' Z ( ++ � �� �,'i��j. � ��.j 1,,��1f�,1;•,,t� ti 11 4 1 �r ���^ 1 4 t @y�4�1 � ��', 1�, ,�. i ,� f f., �: T ra. 4�t bit YI. ( '� i cost slightly less at $2.30 million. The least costly alternative Is modification of the existing developed alignment estimated at $1.26 million. In the case of the_ Crystal and Holly Street alignments, the principle cost would be fo: right-of-way acquisitlon. The principle, cost for the present alignment of Gothard alternative would be for highway Improvements. As with- the Ellis-Talbert construction cost estimates, these estimates must be recognized at; being very general in nature and subject to change in the event of more detailed ,tudy. Environmental Effects Since this Item concerns only realigning an existing arterial rather than adding new arterials, none of the alternatives will result in a substant-1:1 amount of additional vehicle miles travelled In the City. Rather, environmental Impacts of vehicle use will be more affected by the possible elimination of the five-legged Intersection of Gothard Street, Main Street and Garfield Avenue. If either the Crystal or Holly alignment Is selected, .thereby eliminating the fifth leg of the Intersoction, air quality-may be favorably Impacted by the reduction s: In automobile Idling tlms resulting from the more efficient four-way Intersection. If the necessary additional traffic signals installed on Main Street ' and Garfield Avenue at either the Crystal or Holly Street Intersections are not properly synchronized, hotwever, there may be no overall reduction In Idling time at all. I The noise impacts of the alternative alignments will depend In large part upon %flch land uses are eventually approved for the surrounding area. The Gothard-Crystal alignment would potentially have the strongest noise Impact i because It Is more likely. to eventually exist adjacent to residential uses, particularly south of Garfield Avenue. The Gothard-Holly alignment would have nc:ise Impacts upon the existing apartments an the west side of Holly Street south of Garfield Avenue but would not negatively impact the Industrial development which would be likely to occur on either side of It north -of Garfield Avenue. The existing developed alignment of Gothard Street may have noise Impacts if the land to the west of It is redesignated residential, but there will be no significant Impact if it remains Industrially designated. A large drainage swale to the west of the existing developed "S" curve presently collects runoff which Is then drained Into Sully-Miller Lake on the north side of Ellis. Realignment of Gothard Street to connect to either Crystal or Holly Street would require grading of the roadway through the awale. The Impacts of any selected realignment on the local drainage system will need to be examined In detail during preparation of the precise plan of street alignment, In terms of geological hazards, all three alternative alignn ents will connect to Ellis Avenue in the vicinity of the Qolso-Fairview earthquake fault. The Crystal and Holly alignments would necessitate crossing the Yorktown Avenue fault just north of Garfield Avenue. The existing developed alignment of Gothard Street meets the some fault at the Main Street-Garfield intersection. There are no poet deposits or archaeological sites located In the vicinity of any of the alternative alignments. .mtr**gcc-T^q't Z,1Y"r'a.c , A—ul* I '� ��� •w,t. s a.� x Till! ..z�r'�::t�3.1.Zvin- �r`�!�i�, � :a!>'. ,��bv��' '� .7 w 2.2.3 Recommendation Staff recommends that the Gothard-Crystal alignment be selected as currently shown on the Circulation PlLn, with.the tle-In to Main Street In the vicInir.I of Clay Avenue to be precise planned at;.a later date. The recommndatl'an Includes retaining Gothard Street as a secondary, arterial north of Garfield -Avenue and as a primary arterial south of Garfield. Avenue. Land,:,use considerations. and the close prOlmity of necessary, signalized Intersections make the Gothard-Holly alignment w,deslrable. Modiflcetion of the exlsting developed alignment of Gothard Street Is unacceptable becaue It would retain the current five-legged intersection of Gotliard/Main/Gsrfleld. .i t i i f r 4 ' tl is a -22- ,t•,xy-�^' 'rq#,j% 4 *..-Yyra ,aa++,�{7e [i �'"4. ``�yry d.�:,,� *!Zr•.+4'`69 .Lw2.IIAV'^{'.a'}3"SM"'4'+"LT.L.i"f�Y^-,I:+Yi���l�ti.'+45 .$'SY,..'N i➢f��h4 �A.Y.� �s�i����YL..S��'�SY{��9rSo:M�9f. .i:�+L'SN'G A-�.5�✓h.;.�r k+Tt" d' ��m f ' 2.3 Palm Avenue 2.3.1 Background In August 1981, the Huntington Beach Company requested that the City of Huntington Beach amend the Circulation Plan by removing the planned northerly extension of Palm Avenue from Seavlew Street Into the Bolin Chico area. In conjunction with the Huntington Beach Company's request, the City Department of Publla Works requested that staff o1w analyze the redeslgnation of Seuvlew Street from Garfield Avenge to Pacific Coast Highway, and Palm Avenue from Goldenwest Street to Seavlew Street from primary to secondary, and the possible deletion of the stub between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coast I, Highway approximately half-way between Seaview Street and Goldenwest Street, (Figure 2-13). Since the 1981 request for deletion of the northerly extension of Palm Avenue, the City Council has already voted for deletion. This occurred on August 21 1982 when the City Council adopted Coastal Element revisions which Included the Palm Avenue extension deletion. The deletion from the Coastal Element was made at the request of the Coastal Commission. Though the deletion boo been made, the extension still appears on the Circulation Plan. Removal or the extan2Ion from the Circulation Plan Is handled as a miscellanonus Item In Section 2.9 of this amendment. 2.3.2 Analysle 31nce they deletion of the Palm Avenue esxtanslon is being handled us an adminlstrntive Item, this analysis will Include only the redesignation frnm primary to accondnry of Palm Avenue between Goldenwast and Seavlow Streets, and Soavlow Street south of Garfield Avenue+ and delotlon of tho stet bntwean Palm Avenue anti Pacific Coast Highwc, half-way hotwonn Seaview raid Goldenwast Streota. This analysis will examine the offects of the proposed charxjes on 1) circulation pattorns In the Immedloto area and across the City, 2) existing and projected traffic. volumes In the area, 3) existing and planned land ums in the oron, and b) envirvnrTinntai effects. 1a � + ter• ��',`• /��✓�, •�r" ol OF, 46 PALM PACIFIC COAST HWY r 2.3 PALM AVENUE/SEAVIEW STREET Figure 2•-13 Circulation Pelm ,Avenue Is presently Indicated on the Circulation Plan as,.a secondary arterial from Seventeenth Street to Goldenwest Street and as a Orlmsri arterial from Goldenwest Street to Bolsa Chica extension. The portion of Palm Avenue west ,of: Goldenwest.. is priinarily intended to serve the Sencliff`planned residential , development. , Physically, the : street currently dead-ends approximately 2,000"feet west of Goldenwest Struet,,but Is under 'construction to Seaview Street aspart_of.preparatlon`for Seacliff Phase 4 which will contain upproxlmately 550 residential units. •The existing roPdway has adequate.width for a primary arterinl:as It Is presently dedicated, but It Is only striped for one lane, In each direction. Current traffic on this sectlai ut Palm Avenue Is estimated by the Department of Public Works st 2,600 ALIT, placing It at the A level of service for either a primary or secondary arterial. Seaview Street south of Garfield Avenue Is entirely uncanstructed of this''Urne. When,completed, It %vill connect to-Edwards Street north of Garfield Avenue and will serve.,as an alternative to Goldenwest Street In providing access to Pacific Coast Highway;fr64-the northern part of., "she City. 'It will also provide access to the 801s:'Chica Linear Park. The street Is presently designated as a primary arterial from' Pacific Coast HighN-oy to Garfield Avenue and as a secondary arterial north of Garfield Avenue to Edwards Street. .Thi General Plan Men designates the street as a scenic highway between Pacific Coast Highway and Garfield Avenue. Like Seaview Street, the stub between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway, half-way between Goldenwest and Seaview Streets Is presently undeveloped. If constructed, It will be intended to'provide more direct access to Pacific Coast Hlghwav for the residents of Seacliff. It Is designated as a primary ,arterial• The Transportation Demand Model was utilized to i.#.ajevt traffic when Palm Avenue and Seaview Street are complete. The modal assumed that both the Palm Avenue extension and the stub between Palm avenue and Pacific Coast Highway were deleted. As shown in Figure 2-1.4, the medal projected 8,600 ADT on the existing portion of Palm Avenue west of Goldenwest Street and t 140200 ADT on the section of Palm Avenue extending to SeavIew Street. On Seaview Street, the projected volumes were 12$ 00 ADT west of Palm Avenue and only 6,300 ADT east of Palm Avenue. These numbers Indicate that all sections of Palm Avanue end Seaview Street will be operating at the A level of } service for secondary arterials. The model also projected 7,700 ADT on Orange ) Avenue between Goldenwest Street and Palm Avenue. On Goldenwest Street, the model projected 26,100 ADT between Palm and Orange Avenues and 16,700 ADT between Orange Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. These numbers Indicate that Orange Avenue will be at the A level of service for a secondary arterial and Goldenwest Street will uporate at the A level of service for a major arterial. The Transportation Demand Model runs indicate that Palm Avenue and Seaview Street may be overdeaignated as primary arterials. However, the uncertainty of future development and circulation patterns In the Downtown area may detract from the validity of the projected tratfic volumes. It is conceivable that Seavlow Street and Palm Avenue may eventually be more important j z -24- A w _. _ .�h Ti ^ i7R 7FL"'`da'�Ml���*�d.�•_.P9eN+F..?� - ..�" ��'�i+ '�,�f'•�'IPiLF.i."»i���e«f.P;�'.°4'k91�'4114" fN i RANGE PALM77oo 1�,ioo N N , PACIFIC COAfiT HIGHWAY 39,010 • 1995 PtZCJErIM AVE7;VQG DAILY TRAFFIC VC)Uj% S mom r Figure: 2-14 P-A.%D%M- tlllml j .. 1 .y ti 4 connectors between the northern and central city and downtown than the mo-16l lndlcatas. Another possibility Is that 'the Bolsa. Chico arterial ,system- may reaelve.:.modlflcations whlch would place additional demands upon. Seaview Street and Palm Avenue. It may be desirable to retain the existing p:Imary arterial designs,lions on these streets In'order to,ensure adequate right-of-way If Bolsa Chica and Downtown development Intensitities and circulation'pat terns `i chengo. Regardless .of such change, however, the stub 'between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway probably will remain unnecessary as Indicated by the traffic'model. Land Use ti The prinelple land use issue Involves the ability to actually,construct certain ' sections of the proposed arterials., 'she Aminoil USA leased ali'operation'runs. along the'Inland side of Pacific Cor,st Highway directly,adjacent to the Sencliff development. Both the southern most end of Seavlew Street, and the btub between Seavlew Street and Golde iwest Street would extend through the lease Since the.,lease is expected . to last' for at- least another 20 years, It is unreasonable to expect,thsc those sections of roadway could be constructed In the near future. Seavlew Street could still be constructed north of' Palm Avenue, but none of the stub between Seavlew Street and Goldonwest Street could be constructed until the lease is terminated. The Inability to immediately construct either Seaview Street or the, stub completely to Pacific Coast Highway may place additional demand on Goldonwest Street until the lease Is abandoned. The light projected volumes an Goldenwest.Street in the vicinity of Palm Avenue, though, indicate -that the extra trips can probably be handled until Seaview Street can be completed to Pacific. Coast Highway. In any event, none of the proposed changes Included In t this Item will affect that outcome one way or the other. Environmental Effects Because the sections of Palm Avenue and Seaview Street In question are clready designated as primary arterials, the environmental impacts of reducing those streets to secondary arterials and deleting U4e stub between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway are minimal. The reduction to secondary status on Seaview Street may result in slightly increased traffic on Goldonwest Street with accompanying adverse noise and air quality Impacts. j 2.3.3 Recommendation { In order to maintain options for heavier use of Palm Avenue and Seaview Street, staff recommends that these streets retain their primary arterial status. If property owpers In the area wish to develop to lesser Standards, a reduced width should be pursued through preparation of a precise plan of street ' alignment. Since Seaview Street Is designated In the General Plan as a acenlc hghway, no reduction should be granted which would result In Inadequate width for Inclusion of a landscaped modlon as established by City policy. Staff also recommends that the stub between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway be deleted from the Circulation Piro of Arterial Streets and Highways. 25- ��. r' y ' 4 5 2.4 Indianapolis Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard 2.4.1 Background On August.3, 1981, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to study at th possibility of deleting Indianapolis Avenue, between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard (Figure 2-151 from the Circulation Plan of. Arterial Streets find Highways. This amendment Item will serve as that study. Indianapolis Avenue, which extends two and one half miles from Brookhurst Street to Lake Street, is presently designated In the Circulation Element as a secondary arterial. While two miles of the street are-.currently developed to secondary arterial standards, the most westerly section between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard is not. This half mile nection Is developed only to local street standards. The purpose of this portion of Circulation Element Amendment 83-1 Is to consider the deletion of this section from the Circulation Plan cf Arterial Streets and Highways. 2.4.2 Analysis The following analysis will concentrate cis (1) circulation patterns, (2) existing and projected traffic volumes and (3) land use Issues. Circulation Indianapolis Ave-.iuc Is presently intended by the Circulation Element to servo as one of four east-west arterials connecting Lake Street and the Downtown j area with Beach Boulevard and beyond to the eastern City limits. The other three Past-west arterials are Yorktown, Adams and Atlanta Avenues, i i -w. Q: Cf [ _ jl• fiw •. i r 1. .7:�i"N Iflµ. I �• a+t41.lI 1 {� ! ♦ �, t 1" 999 i4 l ww r' dHI �l) �'�1�,'i•' :is�' .�:. 7 :... I f Kyr `, �r. !, � � i.l I �� '•� 1 ... ( 1.1+i M:.n ���•,M'•:�}l:�r++r.:`:"�':JII�:, ' � ! .i DAM IK InTi *�•••y. � 11. � 1:�-•;!� 1' ..__ _ t i's{i�r{.awr7\�1,:r y� �:..>w:���fC.::.'!�' !.' L1][flLfJaJtI�l�► 1 • 1 — :���r t� '�'i:eli. r tea. • D p LOW •f1J 0U .771 oll ---- = _ATLANTA e �� ;, ...`� �j�ft -+••111.�jj-jjij�;.f � i` ..f:.�` Sv/+.?c� y�( i. N •1 t, 2.4 INDIANAPOLIS AVENUE Figure 2-15 N ..,.„..«.r_....,.,,...,..,.,...._.___...— u Of the abovementioned arterials, Adam Avenue is the most Important as It not only extends to the eastern city Irmits,'but also crosses the Santa Ana River Into Costa Mesa and serves as one of the major connections between Costa Mesa and Huntington Beach. Adams Avenue Is designated and developed as a major arterial betweon the Santa Ana River and Beach Eaulevard; and as a primary arterial between Beach Boulevard acid Lake Street. Atlanta Avenue presently' ends at Brookhurst Street, but is shown on .the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets s 3 Highways as eventually crossing the Santa;Ana River. The river crossing is prioritized by the County's ma4ter plan for aconstruction In FY 1984/85. Atlanta Avenue Is designated as n primary arterlal from Lake Street to the proposed river crossing and Is developed to the apIpropriate standards for tha majority of the distance. The only portion of Atlanta Avenue which Is not developed to primary arterial standards is the westerly quarter mile t1tween Lake Street and Delaware. Yorktown Avenue connects the northern end of Lake Street with Ward Street one quarter mile east of Brookhurst Street. Yorktown .is designated and developed as a secondary arrterial between Beach. Boulevard and Ward Street and as a primary arterial between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard. 'Indianapnlis Avenue.is both the shortest and least important of the east-west arterials connecting to Lake Street. Adams and Atlanta Avenues, by virtue of their existing and proposed river crossings and larger arter'lal designations are Intended, to be the primary east-west carriers of traffic to and from the Downtown area. Since Indianapolis Avenue deadends at Brookhurst Street, It Is more likely to carry local rather than regional traffic. In the area between Lake Street and Bosch Boulevard, there are three other local streets which connect the two arterials. These local connectors are Utica, Memphis and Knoxville Ave puss. Like the portion of Indianapolis under r study, these streets are constructed only to local street standards. Unlike } Indianapolis Avenue, they do not cross Beach Boulevard and therefore are Intended to exclusively serve nearby residential users. The Traffic Sectiai of the City Dapnrtment of Public Works has estimated current traffic volumes for the area of concern. As shown in Figure 2-16, It Is estimated that the section of Indianapolis Street between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard currently carries 4,3110 ADT. Using the County's level of service indicator, this portion of Indianapolis Is operating at the A level. Similarly, Adams and Atlanta Avenues, with existing volumes of 7,GU0 and a,;00 ADT respectively are also operating at the A level of service. The Transportation Demand Model was used to project the Impacts of deletion of lndionapolia Avenue as an arterial In the year 1995 (Figure 2-17). The model assumes Indianapolis to be a local street rather than art arterial between Beach Boulevard and Lake Street. Indianapolis would likely carry 6,000 ADT, with thw majority of additional future traffic being diverted to Adams and Atlanta !I Avenues. The model projec's 209100 ADT and 20,200 ADT respectively on Adams and Atlanta Avenues r etween Beach Boulevard and Lake Street. The model therefore Indicates that Adorns and Atlanta Avenues will operate at the acceptable C level of service in 1995 nven with the proposed deletion of Indianapolis. -2 7- 4 4d g .Ii 0 ADAMS .a Ul X O �. 4 r µ+ im N d INDIANAPOLIS r . 1 •� 7 j AUANTA f 1981 ESTIWTM AVk12J M DAILY 17W-TIC VOUM Figure: 2-1F l . i i ADAMS 22�$pp Uj Ix 04 1 INDIANAPOLIS - -a-G,CaOO-r 16,6pp 0 1 ATLANTA -4-2 8,200 _ 24goo 1995 PMJF7= AVF.FI - EIUIY Tf 71c VoUjt s Figure 2-17 I .. _..�.rwRssxt.�ear�h+.�.''d'R -�arpptt9�tf�e�a:3.,an+rrseA4�'++A'�"'�9':�:Y 'LSY.+rlv�rAt.e^w�.�o,¢rnrxv�x:..v�rrocacamwAVrrv..R.�•"�.°•v,...._.._.._ Another circulation Issue involves planning efforts for the downtown area. ` Currently under study is the concept of consolidating corn erclaI and public uses in the area. Because Downt.own planning has only recently begun to focus on specific areas and land uses, such specific data wa., not Incorporated into the Transportation demand Model computer runs which were made for analysis of this amendment. Since the western terminus of Indianapolis Avenue Is in the vicinity of the northern Downtown area, this street may actually be a more Important arterial than pm ,,ently Indicated by the Transportation Demand Model t• The aspect of uncertainty about the Importance of Indianapolis Avenue in the downtown area has Implications for the proposed deletion of the street. By : deleting Indianapolis Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Lake Street,at this time, the City would be precluding the possibility of utilizing this arterial•in'the future to provide access to whatever combination of land use and circulation patterns, eventually develop In the Downtown area. Preserving this section of Indianapolis Avenue as a secondary arterial would preserve the City's options in the future. Land Use ` As previously noted, the portion of Indianapolis Avenue under study, is not presently constructed to secondary arterial standards. Improvement of the area his never been prioritized by the City. Because the street Is presently only 60 (, feet wide, an additional 20 feet would need to be obtained from the abutting property owners in order to develop the street to secondary arterial standards. The portion of Indianapolis Avenue in question runs through the center of the P 9 , Oldtown area of.Huntington Beach. This area is characterized by 27, and 54• foot wide lute which are primarily developed with older single faniily.detached' bungalow, style homes which are located very close to the street. While some recycling has occurred which has reuulted in scverel 10 foot dedications along Indianapolis, it Is not expected that the entire length of the street would be : , dedicated through recycling for many years. In order to upgrade the street to secondary standards, It would probably be necessary for the City to Initiate extensive condemnation proceedings in order to obtain tha necessary right-of-way for street widening. f,. Because the existing units are constructed so close to the existing street, condemnation of 10 feet on either side would result in destruction of most homes on both sides of the street. It is therefore likely that the City would Instead condemn 20 feet an one side of the street which would result in the loss of only one row of houses (approximately 28 units) rather than nearly double that amount by condemnation of bosh sides of the street. Due to recent recycling, Borne of the parcels abutting Indianapolis on either side have already dedicated the presently required 10 feet of street frontage. If the deletion of Indianapolis is approved, it will be necessary for the City to go through formal abandonment procedures for those existing dedications. .za. Environmental Effects Because the se ction of iniilanapt7lis Avenue in qunation is`already existing as,a local street, , the .environmental impacts of deleting the secondary artarlal designation are limited. The land uee and circulation patterns'In the general area were`analyzed In the previous sections. The deletion of the secondary arterial designation on 'Indianapalls between. Lake and Beach may :result in increased traffic voluriss an' Adams and Atlanta. Avenues and,allg'getly more congestlon on Indianapolis after the downtown area recycles..:.Any.lh6ri oaw In traffic would have accompanying adverse noise and air quality lnnpaets, .but such tmpacU; would in this case be the result of nearby development rathejr than deletion or non-deletion of the'Indianapoiis arterial dea._.�eitidn. 2.6.3 Recommendation Because plans have not been finalized for the downtown aria, the importance of Indianapolis Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Lake Street to unresolved at thin time. In aller to preserve options for access to the Do,;YM wn area, staff recommends that the secondary arterial designation an the subject portion of Indlenaipalts Avenue be retained. I e � , fWR , , - 1. t r � �BROOMS''M `t 't Alffll WWO WRRIM, i 2.5 Pacific Coast Highway 2.5.1 Background The proposed amendment Is to upgrade the status of Pacif:� Coast,Highway from n primary to a major arterial In the area between the Santa Ana River and Goldenwest Street (Figure 2-181 If approved, this would brine the City's Master Plan of Circulation Into conformance with Caltrans proposed Improvement program for, Pacific Coast Highway and the Orange County Mastet Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways. Caltrans project is to Improve PCH from four lanes to six In the area between Route 55 In Newport Bench and Gotdenwast Street In Huntington Beach. The estimated data for completion of this project Is the summser of 1986. t The Pacific Coast Highway widening project will he cninpleted in conjunctioc* with several other State and municipal projects. These include: State Parks and Recreation District's Improvement Plan for Huntington State Beach, tie, Army.Corps of Engineers Banta Ana River Bridge widening project,, the City'.. Blufftop Landscape Plan for the area between Goldenwe 3t and Ninth Streets and the proposed connection of the Beach bike trail with the Santa .Ana River bike trail. Cal Trans has also coordinated the project with the Orange County Tranrit District to accommodate public transit needs. All of -the projects mentioned above will he di-icusaad in greeter detail in Lund Use, Section 2.7.2. 2.5.2 Analysis R� They following analysis will examine the effect of the proposed change on (1) circulation patterns In the area, (2) existing and projected traffic volumes, (3) land use Issues, (4) fiscal impact, and (5) environmental effects. _38_ I s}3 •Sis._},sY'o•.c.. -'.at�. f• C .i f 1 if. -Z `•r� � �' • If iov ILI .. � :.}`� r ��,r •►: • A, , .11 � w.. , , �• '.. \. ti' ,� •i"�y�' �' •/ '1 .:` // � ' , fit•, • .•!. awl.' •r '1 =.�!��'•_i• r •};/„, �`r f ;;,•,` � ,ram i ` % ; r �.«, 4��?fin.. `•.�����.'j' /•�; �; .. Ilk 205 PACIFIC C•4AST ,HIGHWAYmm Figure 2-18 { t Circulation Pacific Coast Highway is a critical link connecting coastal cities for a distance of thirty miles, from long Beach to Capistrano Beach. . The nearest parallel route to Pacific Coast Highway Is the Interstate 405 freeway which Is approxirinately six milev north easterly. As a result, Pacific Coast Highway is the primary route between the coastal communities and therofore must accommodate numerous commuter and recreational trips. At. the. present time, PCH Is designated as a primary arterial an, the Clty's Master Plan of Circulation. Figure 2-19 illustrates existing traffic. Presently, PCH Is carrying 31,400 trips in the area between Goldenwest and Main Street. South of Main Street, traffic, increases to 36,000 trips and ranches 45,000 ADT at the Int9rsection of Bro•.,khurst and PCH. Because the Highway is currently operating'over enpneity (ranging from level of service D to level F% . It- has experienced a high accident rate. If no Improvements are made, traffic congestion and safety problems will continue to occur and will intensify with time. The projected 1995 traffic volumes an Coast Highway hive been Illustrated In Figure 2-20. As shown by these numbers, significant traffic Is expected to occur In the area between Brach Boulevard and Lake Street. In the ores immediately south of Lake, traffic Is projected to reach 53,109 trips per day, which Is equivalent to a level of cervlce "E." Level of service "E" Is not considered uncommon for a downtown area. The City of Huntington Beach is currently exploring alternative Inland routan to help reduce congestion on Pacific Coast Highw•9y. . One'of."theso '!s planned along the Orange Avenue-Atlanta Avenue corridor. The Clty recently acquired a portion of the necessary right-of-way near Lake,Street to help complete this Important link making Orange-Atlanta a primary arterial. Another Inland route, a Walnut Avenue extension wlilch would connect Beach Boulevard and Luke Street, is also being studied. If completed, this would provide accesc to the commercial areas east of Lake Street and will help reduce traffic volume i an the highway through the downtown aren. Goldenwest Street, Brach Boulevard and Brookhurst -Street are the major arterials connecting Pacific Const Highway'with the San, Diego Freeway and Inland communities. Based on the design and capacity criteria outlined earlier In. this section, traffic on `Scach Boulevard currently exceeds that stroet's ; optimum capacity from Warner Avenue north to the freeway. While existing . traffic an Goldenwest.Street is not as groat as that on Beach Boulevard, the j optimum capacity of this street Is also exceeded from McFadden Avenue to the j freeway. Traffic on Brookhurst Street is currently below the street's designed capacity. The proposed Improvements to PCH will not result In 'any significant Impacts to traffic or circulation on these streets. Land Use The proposed circulation amendment is not expected to have any significant i Impact on:surrnunding land uses. The majority of the project will consist of ,1 s!mply re-striping Pacific Const Highway within the existing right-of-way. The only area where property acquisition will be needed is between Beach Boulevard and the Santa Ana River. The necessary property will be acquired from the. +� -31- i 1*+..+.e-..•+•...�..t.•.. .. .� .� :t•. ,. .y. ,. ......... ., . ': a. n-a.........t.. .,.,. . r ......_ ...._. ..,.....,. .-,,,.r.v.-hi..e....oc'Fevw.w..«wb......,.n+.w.r I i t% 1 p HA 4 t....-M a � 45iOOO �. 3 , G00 ' 36,000 31,400 i ti 1981 ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES r c r j Figure 2-19 J ;i i 00 0 • a -. + Y a' r rQ �.►y 54,928 a x ` 1�1. 44i32R �� ► i 1'1uK c�� � y �►r�'rr 4512(18 g5,585 1995 PF;OJECTED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES .E y Figure '2-20 7rIt i�`T�':ii`i�-;�.rp�•. ,��.tr.,. ..,. .:'. -t:na.'.' ...... ..>... .._..... ....w.,........,.:.1'o�i:,:� ..... ... ,., .. .k. .:'a.....,.4tw=•.:.:... ,�2 ... ,a+„ n...,�r...vrrr•,;�1�'�I r. ' s . .Jt State Department of Parks and Recreation on the beach side, and has been set aside'In their rehab111tation plan for Huntington State Beach. As was mentioned earlier, the State Is currently in the process of rehabilitating Huntington State Beach by adding new landscaping, parking area and concession stands. When completed, this project will provide 1300 additional parking spaces to help s,}' mitigate parking lost as a result of restrtping the highway. As a part of the total PCH Improvement program, the Army Corps ..of Engineeru, In conjunction with Caltrane, will be. replacing the Santa Ana River bridge. This bridge constructed In '1923 was.widened to ;four lanes In 1932. Presently, It is showing definite signs of deteriorating,-cracking, spalltrg and corrosion of exposed steel. The. State Office :of. Structures considers the replacement of this bridge a high priority In the Bridge Replacement Program. When the bridge Is re-built, a new bike Inne will be Included as a part of the project. The completion of this project Is scheduled for 1986. Caltrans has worked closely; with Orange County Transit D19trlct'(OCTb),'to accommodate public trensportetion needs In•, the PCH, widening project. Presently, the curb-side parking lane an the south side of PCH, east_of:Lake Street, is used for.beach-routo bus layovers. Upon completion of the re=striping project,.however, this section.will become a travel lane, thus a'newlucatlon•for t the layover area outside the highway right-of-way will be necessary. The City } In _coordination' with Caltrans and OCTD Is:designing a new layover facility Immediately adjacent to the existing site 'and seaward of,the right-of-way between PCH and the beach'parking lot. Tha'new layover area will ednslst'of an expanded;passenger, waiting platform, nddffional necessways to the beach, and a curb cut to provld6 a turnout for bus parking. The proposed project,will necessitate the removal of come landscaping; however, 1t will. not,require'the lass of any parking spaces. The new layover area Is expected to be'completed when they PCH matrlping project is completed. fn .addition to the bus layover'area, the City' to reeommendlo'g some turther modifications ,.,to improvo safety on Pacific „ Coast Hlghway.,' .These recommendatlo'ns are Included In the Ci�y's propase'd'Downtown Specific Plan. First, a comprehensive`ssignalization potter.will batter,contr6l vehicle access :onto.PCH.' Second, cul-de-ancs should be:developed on all streets perpendicular }}� to PCH where them are no signals to eliminate uncontrolled access to and from f,�N tho highway. Third, a raised median should be constructed along:the entire length of PCH, with gaps only at signalized Intersections. This median should be landscaped and,anould incorporate a low fence to Inhibit pedestrlans crossing ' at mid-block. Finally, additional curb cuts an PCH will be prohibited to help 44 reduce accidents. f Fiscal Imnact ' The City's Public Works Mpnrtment'prepared:the following cost analyses.;;in considering these estimates, it is Important to note'that June widths, parking requirements, bus turnouts and landscaping are ell items that would greatly ;. affect construction and/or right-of-way acquisition costs. The following estimates do not include right-of-way costs or the widening of the Santa Ana River bridge. -32- 3' f , The Pacific Cons Highway project was estimated as two separate areas. The first estimate addresses the area from Goldenwest Street to Beach Boulevard, as the Improvements in this area will be completed, within the existing right-of-way. The second area Is from Beach Boulevard to the Santc Ana River, where additional right-of-way will be acquired. In ttie area between Goldenwest Street ,and 8eaci+;Baulevaitf, .improvements would;coat `1.2. milli on"dollars,, traffic signals $200,000, drainage structures $2000000' and street fighting. $100,000 dollars. •in the ,area' between Beach Boulevard .and the Santa Ann River,,,highway Imp'rovomei ks' would;'run 3.4 ; million dollars with an additional $100,000 for traffic signals and $160,000 for street lighting. The total cost for PCH-Improvements between Goldenwest Street and the Santa Ana River are 5.38 million dollars. {( Because Pacific Coast Hlghway .Is a State. Highway, the money for these Impravements will come from Caltrans, however, the actual construction will probably be contracted out to the City. Environmental Effects The environmental Issues addressed In this section are.noise, air quality,',blots and *archaeology. No significant Impacts.have been Identified In any of these areas. The following provides a brief description of each. in 1974, the City contracted with Wyle.Laboratories to prepare a noise survey for the City. This study delineated corridors where ground transportation6olse exceeded Idn 65, the base level generally considered acceptable for residential uses. The Wyle Study Identified Pacific Coast highway as one of these corridors. The proposed ;restrlping project will better accommodate existing traffic, therefore no significant impacts are6,anticipated. Some short.term'Impacts may be experienced during actual construction of .this additional right-of-way s between Beach Boulevard and the Santa Ana River, however, It should,be noted i. that this area a largely open space and industrial, and any Impacts would be minimal. Similar to noise,_ air pollution Is not expected to;lncraaeo as a result'of the project. Theoretically, when traffic Is flowing smoothly th®re , are leas pollutants emitted thaii during stop and go traffic. Because the project le ' designed to Improve traffic flow, It may have a beneficial impact an air pollution. The State Department of Fish and.Game.has Identified some wetland areas on the Intend side of PCH between Beach Boulevard and the Santa Ana River. No construction or right-of-way acquisition, Is expected to encroach Into' these areas, however, special precautions should be taken during construction and ' restriping to avoid disruption of any plant or wildlife habitat. No archaeological sites have been identifiefln'ihe project area, however, two historic buildings are located on Pacific 'Coast,Highway. One Is the 'Golden Beer at 306'PCH'and the other is the Gardener Haute at 114 PCH. Beacuse the widening project in'this area will be completed with the existing right-of-way no Impacts are anticipated. -33- +tM.'t!�'.its...»y..... .. Y.J 'i.,nr;.. ... .. r . r„ ... ..q. .. .w j:,i',a. . . ............ .o-... ... r... , y.....hl�.IIa•u Nat....w(w.,.. nip&, %xv#,• /mot w�•t Y. f s ♦'f''. j. ..1 •iaM Recommendation ' ,The proposed amendment will bring the Clty's tvlastar, an of.Clrculation into conformance with the County'a'_Mdstar. Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways, and Caltrans proposed re=etriping/wldening pr6)ect. . The amendment Is not expected to,,have any .negative Impacts , on `surrounding lend uses and will Improve ciraulatlon.on'the hlghway.:In light of.this,'staff recommends approval j of the proposed circulation amendment reclass fying Pacific Coast Highway as a major arterial from'the Santa Ana River to Goldenwest Street. . tr • _ if -34_ ' �.. .....•......vw.w.r+r....�.-...... .. ...,... _ s,is .. ..�.. ... i=.J[..'w..[•*.r... .......«....•----,....«.�•....+. ....... .._....- l J i I i I 2.6 Miscellaneous Items These sections address a•number of minor name changes and other correctlons of the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways as Indicated,in Figure 2-21. 1. Change Argosy Drive to Argaay Avenue. i 20 Change Lake Street between Beach Boulevard and Garfield Avenue to plain street. .3. Changei'g&hard Street between Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway to' Seventeenth Street. 4. If the Ellis-Talbert alignment is selected'for CIR 83-1 Area 2.1, changeTalbert Avenue west rf Edwards Street to Ellis Avenue. i III � f 5. Add the name ('enter Avenue to the secondary arterial north of Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and Beach Boulevard. 6. Indicate ' the Orange Avenue realignment with Atlanta Avenue with a dashed line. ' 7. Indicate the o Street connection of Delaware St Atlanta i r t tla a Avenue with a solid line. 8. Indicate the connection of Yorktown Avenue at Lake Street with a solid line. 9. Indicate the connection of Ellis Avenue between Gothard Street and the -Pacific Electric right-of-way with a solid line. 10. Indicate the connection 'of Saybrook Lane to Edinger Avenue with a solid line. -;5- ��.�,.p s......i,; ..t:i,•t.. .. ..•...`rt7 . -. . '.. ;. .. :i�«• -• . . , . ... r: . , .., - ...,.,....... .............. ........w++..+wn+.s,.w.:..«.Y7ww+w+w•w+waw� r I ' � I I ^own Ong CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL ' y ' STREETS AND HIGHWAYS . ADOPTED FW-gOL JTVN No 43W- 76 S LEGEND: MY -- FREEWAY wREEI CAPA r...+ MAJOR .45= \ ---- PAmARY 30000 - - �F SECONDARY 20.000 • � I ti NOTE:We - • wwl KCISWLT t0ault w�OF wi g j' '� f \ auto twn.curt 4KAl watt w 'Q ta.r a r.a cusri t= ' r � . ��',..� 2 f,, 12 8 3 cch ti . HUNTINGTOU BEACH •:-- OEtANGE COUNTY CALiFORNtA ' t V M`Vw-/. -Y. R.• �• , I 2.6 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Figure 2-21 1f , 11. Indicate Springdaie Street south of Talbert Avenue with a solid line. 12. Delete the extension of Palm Avenue from Seaview Street into the Bolsa Chico. t ' f r , �r J iiy���t+ `1�'13+71.x1'�.'...:,t.,-.}+.t7r'�':...11".:+:C�•.». ti•...M..e.#c R.r...-.... ..:.a:;....•..�:%�i;«"'G:r�l'i::i:3...tRr.,..•............—....ew ...«.......,......wwn.....c�a.«.w...x•r+wrr.�:�wr«...•ReoRLil 'lei, r r s r 3.0 . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Ae mntionad In Sectlan 2.11 this: document. constitutes the environmental lmpact, repo L ,Jbrr. praposed. Circulation Element, -Amendment.r83 1. The environments! setting of the areas In which changes to the Circulation.Plan"are proposed are. described In 'Sections - L1,-thraugh 2.6. ,:,Areas •of •potantleI sli,Inlficant impacts'arro.ldvnttfied in'tir► initial study which�hae bean Included as an appendix to'thie report. These Impacts and their evaluation am cumm©rized below: Ellis Avenue Impact Evaluation SoU disruption, change Dismissed as'too speculative. In topography. Geologlc`hezarda. Discussed In ' Section 2.1.2 under Environmental Effects. Air quality. Same as above. -37- •.y�y,...w•Q �,4i�ir�.•';v:'•:1,:uiC.:9t:...Y•..s.ww.....,wrs........ai.,..L�.,.nr.....1 ..,.I.,+y..•...w,....�....• .........,-... ........».........,...,,.«.. « atr..yvwi.L7t,i/'F V:1tM..i:N.C!'a=JV'At#",�' .r lmpact Evalat_inn Surface runoff. Same as above. Noise levels. Some as above, Additional vehicular movement. Discussed In Section 2.1.2 under Circulation. Circulation pattern Sane es above. Gothard Street $all disruption, change In Dismissed as too speculative. topography. Geologic hazards. Discussed 'in Section 2.2.2 under Environmental Effects. Air quality. Some as above. Surfaec runoff. Same as above. Noise levels. Same as above. Additional vehicOar movement. iiscussed in Section 2.2.2 under Circulation. Circulation pattern. Same as above. t Palm Avenue } Air quality. Discussed in '-S,aetian 2.3.2 under Environmental Effects. . ' ' Noisy levels: Serve as above. f' ` ..'Additional vehicular movement. Discussed in Section 2.1.2 under ` Circulation. ; lndlana�olis Avenue Air quality. Discussed. in Section 2A.2. under Envlrarimental Effects. 'Noise levels. Same as above. Additional vehicular movement. Discussed In Section 2.4.2. under Y Environmental Effects. Poe)fic Coast Highway Air Quality. Discussed In Section 2.5.2 wider Environmental Effects. Noise levels. Same as above. 48- i t4 r �i p'�i'� 1 NJTRr�1C+31�tKr."""�Y l �h� �, �� S �, h," ,'4• t ,� ,,�• k��. t, :�,tf�l L{S�LL�. t t 8...^A�� lmpnrt Evaluation Additional vehicular movement. DiscusEed In Sectipn 2.5.2 w mer Environmental Effocts. , Miscnllaneoua Items None None 3.1 Relationship Between Local Short-term. Uses of Man'a Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement. of Long-term Productivity Amendment of the Circulation Element as recemmanded by staff would result In minimal short-term impacts but po3sible Iong-term Impacts., The amendmentc •proposed for Ellis Avenue, Gothard Street. and„ Pacific. Coast Highway may result In Increead local traffic with accompanying local Irapect3 on nolso and air quality. The changes are proposed, however, with the longterm Intent of reducing overall vehicle miles traveled .and producing smoother traffic flow in the City, which would have net beneficial effects on air quality and fuel consumption. Th©'proponod realignment of Ellis Avenue could"allow-far construction of a roil along a scenic bluff area. While the proposed alignment may detract from the productivity. of one area, It would avoid the poaulble disruption of two archaeological sites along a bluff which lies in an area traversed by the existing planned alignment. The proposed alignment of Gothard Street, would preserve to large area 'Of developable land. The alternative Gothard .Street alignments would dotract S from the development potential of the Bran somewhat. j The proposed widening of Pacific Coast Highway,will rerquire, soma property ►. acquisition from th©,State Department of Parka and Recreation on the beach side of• the road. This propertj ,hau been act aside for the atreet widening j• project by the,State In the :ehobilitbilon plan for Huntington State ©each. All I: parking lost in the street widening will be replaced within now parking areas to be developed as a part of the beach rehabilitation. 3.2 lrraversible m. Unavoidable Environmental Changes The Irreversible or unavoidable..environmental changes created by the proposed amendments to the Circulation Element are elthe:r minimal or; highly 'speculative. The proposed realignment of Ellis Avenue Is conceptual at. this point;.addltional analysis of environmental constraints and Impacts will take place In developing a precise plan for the arterial. The environmental changes I associated with the proposed realignment are much too speculative to asaoss in detail at this ,time. Similarly, the proposal to retain the current Circulation Plan alignment of Gothard Street will essentially retain a.conceptual alignment which is also highly speculative. -39- " ftrj�.•,l.?t:i: 1LCy� .:'.1r... s, �dr. .. ya: ..! qv •a.. +a••�+•a.Sti:n_..iZ.,,,;A'1. .. f 'f 1. 1�� - ` ���� t�� �i'���` ,}� a�e� 44 A .� ��,++ }��� •��, C�.r,4t.4 7 '� J�� 'i� y��p ';)i � a ���`i� , .�.�a {s , i ' ��' �(jj s'.1 �Y1�i 3y$t:. �}� �f ��•� f� j }Y[#' �y� • t �t Z Y, f! 4�•1 .'l ..t' IS •'4 Yy �y •5' �/[:"',�i ,M ii }, . f. , ..'�:}>'�, .7�1 �� '����t : �•�'`'y ...j' 'w5�','l�j ,�j. 'w "�ti3;°w �'�••sr't .�.et,.� ,Pti'� �tty �t, '!• �E� `s� �i:.� X 1^%.spy;' :`xX� 7�i. ONE EAli �V4^ ' � r Y {{` ,R�v'J1t�•t� f �y • • S •• ••• i+�y�,•11ti��1M�S t P:�Yr • i 1 • *•• �+ • • • ► 6 ryu fit', ,y .t�`�f{�• t���+..t LI • r 4 t.i�C.4,�j 1+�iSp e • • • �•Y,�y ]]�:'i: t r - fi�rr;; 1,ST;,i,ttn«'r•{�r,`rUil'',,Iju ,• l+t T,4ktt�'4 r�k�,l r , Y i Y 2 *�•sit r,a7 rf.4, :"VI •y, .�r'�yY ku'1 R "*y, �; � •,•,�L tin c y^'�i f�� t t +• 1 ti `'r 1#�,� ..` }�;� 4 K;t}rt1��# t1.� i+r+4�'._ �� x i ��s t . 'L +1 t+ r •���h j x,, �'t '�'t'�',s ,; +`t rt. �r � f•\1 �' i` ttr ".5+ �, �v} ,�; F � 4� tr ti � J ti+,�tj�`a..�1f_r� �144 tt ��t C: �y'i♦�}1 x[[ y �� r,L �,ek a r t � �*k+ �E� tt.. 1 sty��\� r"�j. +- !'r�tZ•1y��'�'�C `MMt+ 4 1 •-t�\' \i F t�`yi#��lr R `� �'' +�'1�w +�t�e r t ir�t� d��t���,,. k� L+fit + 'i' r•*�. "t2 �'I.a S'a Y1�Sy F�Tf!{+��;r � -i Y, F\ �,y � rl,t'�1L��a t � �. .' � ,�,. 4t 1 �i�E�';�.,. U'"; „ t.�. +'� .S'1 �� � �, `\�� +.,Y-'{ 1 .t ith� r \ t1 1 `:�' kt� '!1_•. , _.i xj�.r a =.� S:� ', !t• tx�;}`, p 4, �rw �_ `t, Rty st.a -,t � ., � t ,� . ,�A, � v 1, �,,'F rt ,�: F;•j �1..+ 1�� �1 F .t' � �,S•+#\� \: \ .ty 3��4 1` i•.r t i� ,t S � � 'Sy xt �, w i. t ..�1t ''t7t�y, , `' •� ''��,,"Y1.'1�1t y `� y�d a, a;"' . -`li tt, rR �t'�, s t ♦ t a '4 iL ,w qq��.i��!` �• :,4 �t� �j,.#�ti �py`''.•iC�4 r ��14'l"�.+5`,�'.F ;�,�.�� 1:•" ,;3 ,.7 ti��.y ,� �.i'� .:4�t vt t \'�� .•q•�'�i�� ���.r 44}1 l4Rt�;,��'sK�+t a,�,�j ;�y• p YR•j�,t`i�* '�: S4'% f � �L � � ,xt� ti ��, Zt �� r•;'t �4�' y� ,r''7:.,,'4 •�'i+"'+k�,.y'�,4�`��� •�r�+G. lt' ;, ,•_,��} •,t,,h + ir..�� . ��.�;• ',t 4 +r R+� '� .�: 4� �•x� . t^ 4 '•t 1'. 'tR' � •r ,, a � t l � '��,�,, r � �, 4y .4�. •►,, R�y�„� i "y5t1� x-..,`�. 4�t. i+,. t �;,,, �� •,. f,{},S• +•li r� t n�I ,�.,,.A`�, h� t„ 4,` ��'• r t� ty+�,'•�"•,� t � r �+ r + i,A,i ;'�'+ttf�. ,r t ;� \\ '�'t w '�€r'ia�'. �i ,�1. •4 1 4.}"'� .: 1Y 1,1�tiy # i, ;�� �,�R}�w, a 't �' �� ( r'`L,1:t � "��� '�* �",r�•at';�t x`'1,l` :1�:'� .j. ��.+} ty�,•$�v '�tt•�,Ti\q �4y�ti ,�.x,±R L. t + '1.�tt,��,��t,y'�.�'F '�+�„� #��*;'t,�t�"di},1�x�;tA4^x 4i' ��►.��,�1�y�� $'� ;'aC'� a'"R,�t.��+"�.y{::.r'x. ti'`.�.�Y, '�+;,=?,�}k a.,►}�,•�rr�t•�� '� !!;.�4 :'.'�. �, � ��`'t``�.\"•` ��,?.'�:�t; ,,.;`&;''�},t.�M� .tr c�:y�,••�':��. ,�4 ,�..•�,•'i f,� �„S s:_�kxj'�.z1�j1 *� t' ,�1+�1 w �3r ,� _i x .��,ZY � �* , � � �,z �,�{ t "• "►',�F� �.'}� ,;� �,� ► � ���' ��' t y r �, t j, ;�;t5� '�. rr�� Si'. 'x+ _y.4{�'sl�.�`N.� ,'Y� � �a,.y� gr�t` '�t1.�1r. y�'t� �`'t• ��`:t:: �+�Y;'' + �`},+1� � a'�l� k��+ ���` ,� �. �+�t t� R ► Ij.+fi i • '�v��a�tl•,,i? �1 l y r r L Yf{�lp , qy 1 t f t+ j 4 � L F 1, } j� •,f-4. Ft ,A � �,�,,tl� � rR'�'�Y, iy,t`l..ira ,�t{f"r # �,t / . t.R,, a � ,.L_ �'6+ � t• Gi � �.F•t�i 4� 1+�R+� a�7�1Yi�, L4'�,Frt ��►. � 4;t. .��•; � r`li. .,�;'1; !`�' Fr"t '�� t�'�','lr��ter! i 1 '�I't' S.; �`�,:,�kS ��ex, `'��'h'e � r:R �' 't'} � ' t �,�>•T 4.. r �. u++t''F �� 4 ` ;" �,v t�F i� at 4 � ,* x► + ��., ` i : y 1 �" ''{{��+� t r '�Z R4,'► (,'t .'i r i � V. �'',�. ,� �, Lt A'L� a� � j a� ,,1 'a �� �''!`"' � f •►r ; fi 2�t ti;� v ,,i t w 'r � �� ��'cF;� f �� t', `��t+l" '�. +a. t, `�, s G }u{ �' v a•Ra ! �A ,+11s y + F W� k'1",'�" 1+ � '�'tt + .{�<;�4 V:�•,1 �i � •tl •`�1� 1 �'��� ��:.t j,��`�y�S��t°t�}e 4t*,+t�z�11# ���j���,� :i' �` { ��•'��� 1`��� 4 �h�. h} �� 4R� x• d�.``lv{ ,� � �, :�L�L 1r.�r't �" ,��� ' 4,1��..`+ \�� �"Rd`. L; '�. �w�� �"r� �� �} :�� 4`\4 '+7t7y�G ,E�F� � � a,+ •ti4p • A . r 'h �4 +"s y, �� �;{��� 4 •t.�St��.�}� p�`�".' \'i"t��r''�� '`tY*�•4t�'�F�'. ti'��'�'���. �}` Z ` F� ,+�,{�x•�� 4 ir. `1. �•,L�� r( I t 45 �1�s\\\(,�1y ��*s t y�� r y, v� trr�;t r¢`'k,�,:y,,',�it.'+.r'\r1h �'Y �`'i '!��i, v �4�7' 'th, ♦t� '� ""�yi iL ysh`, 4 y,y a „i�. it 1•�7•.�� }`•F� 4r �, +M; u •v tF � � �+ {, �y� . *f�`Lf't+ `i�v r •�" .�'' 'F Y{�,lr t 14 F,' r 1. r. a► 4 t + 11it• r �\ Y>.S{ , ►. >rTiF<�7 > t Alfy � �t tilt? v' ,►•4g +�4 xr ;'�� i` trt•♦ t►• 'rr: t, •t 1,} ,s+ t �y�► �+l..,t t4 � i� rR'� , ► a }� } + t,t,„ � Sri ti 1 F x►t• d�,st v►4 Q` �f."1 ,'}�• 4. }a ��4�;+t1•{k ix„'�� �yl 'k te• �l # 1�, f�Arlr�� +, t.t R,i��Y�•'Xl '�, � Y 4 t ,. 1I y,�• f 1��II + `, `` La k � iy 1 1► ht� ,� r�-� Rti~t�'�, i�'•�, L tx' t,, z � .y,„,} ♦1•��•r�'�'1� *►•. a'a ��v' .4�4'�'♦ tl�� �'� �.`�?�et1a4°�1, `�Y,�� �;� i�Yl'�'k•1x"'n.. L Q, of ,t�AR w+�.t 'C R\Li,'/ t �+1� l L'_t � �•.,-c+ ,�_� ' k Lq�-7 RR;�1 F.• ... .� , �'�1 1� t�'i'1+��`���.ff.14��\4 H �tr Fiv I-- 1.'t r}��"�t{���ti�� �j�'�'t 1-,t��.:`�•\��L���'�x ,�'tSfNf. 4����,#'Y�� ���[ �1�• ��1 R. . _, '+Ki1 ) 4. � a 1 • 4,,�,� ..� '1 w ►l 'rL,t�, tir , M � �y�.t� ► .41+��, jLtri1 t fl + Y31y`,S6x`Aiit,�r „�wf.!'�' � t+� '� 4�«„il.•L`�i �.i �`^ L.:stl. { '•f'tl4 � At } li►4'"�� �.�i�� �4 t�°`� '-3 4. r7, R t,`w ➢�. '(7� . Rt .,.":`+' 'S `'y\ t{\� �'.4'.f^Rs. �'• .,r. ,ir s,,,ti+,4�. 1'tiF +l[ ► , i:'lp}ti[4 �i^ ,+}� �txk,�t:'�. +'1F.►' S.f�.� 2 �t �.' �„�,Yt 1},'�.gr,,.y,1x,�.. ft �.., f�, i1,�:: ��'ts G �i; 'I}'yf .'. ;^�► :9. # .�itM`. +;i `"� ,, i^� �'> �tr'���1 t;• � � � is � �_�'� a M4��. ~ .7 � ,y Y r 7�t 1 ;'( ,.g.��� �}�����,,i is ,4' ��, �' �i►'(�� 5 i �, !'t .� •�. 1 � '{y�.� �" � 4 eS` '. �{�< � f`i, t����4 rt�y-'���•1�4 �'�!� ���`y�t�,tr t�i �,_� x r N>��y,r ,�� ,ti>`.r�y���'{��• j�t• '}}, � sy' ,fib � y�i � ��. ` Y• :} s" Y�!• r f d APPENDIX I •1 UVIRONMENTAL CHEC UST FORA (To Be Completed By Lead Agtmy) !. Background 1. Name of Propo.tent City g j HIHMmtJQ= ROqh-j DaveIgEMt Services 2. Address and Phan Number of Proponent In ,mj%4. ,Strp xwntinaton Beach✓ CA 92647 3. Mote of Ch'eckliat SuWtted March 8, 1983 4. Agency Requiring Chadtlist Department of Development Servicea S. tame of Proposal, if owlicable t No. 83-4 } I I. 9wirorwnentol lapacts lanctions of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are requlred(on cttoched sheets.) Yes MSIM N40 i. Earth. Will the proposal result Inc a. Uutable earth:conditions or in dvnges In geologic W-,.,tructures? .ram._.• r _ t b. Cisruptiom, displccementi, eompxtl(m or overcovering of the voll? X C. Change In topography of ground surfaco relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification ! of any unique geologic or ptrrsical'featum? �,•,•_ X e. Any increase in wind o: water erosion of t .r tolls, elthar on or off the site? f. Cha+ges in deposition or erosion of bow sands, or•.chmws In siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the chennel of a rhvr or strmn or the beet of the ocean or MY boy, inlet or bite? y 1 , lls rtr. ne...-S-�-y.. .�.h . ..•. ., .... .. . .. „ :,. ,L..;l..e .,. �..... ........ ...•...,......1•uxlr.,.)se:x•.tXl *C'..'1fi,+M••tMtiA �lr'�SSxL it t'yui.>,i' .. :•La:•. ' •i�i l L r . If L. 11 ' , r I I Yes No g. Eyposure of people or pr+t+perty. to ge1610- ... gic lv=ords wch as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar ha=arcb? x. Air. Wiil the prVosal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of, ambient air quality? b. The creation *f objerctionable odorti :;,�,_ c. Alterottan or air movement, snolsture,•or temperature, or any chow'e In CUM' ate, either locally or regioJhaliy? '3. Water. Will the prr,.oaai rirult`IM oi. Charges In,currents; or the course of di• ; rection of water movemerobt in either 'x s :.marine or fresh venters?; ; b. Chirves In obsorpthn ruses, drainage pot- ` 'terns,;ar.the rate and, amount of surface ' runoff? of Alterotlums to the course or flow of flood wuters? X d. Change In the amount of surface•water in any water body? ..X.... .- e. ; Discharge into surface waters,- or, in any { + alteratio:n of su:fow::woter quality;An- cluxling• but not limited;to,bmpusrotura; dissolved oxygen or turbidity?, f. Aftoratlai of the direction or rate'of flow' of ground waters? X 'l g. Change in the•quantity of ground waters,, either.through direct additions or .with- drawais, or.through Interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?.-!,' ;_X h. S56 itantlai•reduction•in the.amount of water otherwlse available far. public water= supplies? :. � _X I. Erq�euvre of people or property to'water ro- lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 116 v r •y 'i • .gy S .a 1 5 � .� 4 i. r ,t x •t l ���( � 1 .� 1►` +'fit, ♦:'t y " .. i. : i Yes Movbe No 4. Plarst Life. Will the.proposal result In: a. Change in the diversity of species, or nurrBer of any species of plants (including frees, shrubs, gross, crops, and aquatic ` plants)? ,..._... .....X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique►, 1 rare or endangered species of plants? X c. Introduction of new species of plants'intb an orea,.or in a barrier to the normal . r+eplentsh nwt of axIsting species? ^ •,�,,, X . d. Reduction In ocreoge of any agricultural X crop? .�...... ......,... S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result Ins a. Change In,the diversity, of species;'or nurr�ers of any apeoies of,antmals (birds, 4 shallfislr,�als bent'tic luargarismstil�, fish arrJ i cots)? x b. Reduction of the numbers of-any unique, ' rare or endangered species 'of animals? X_ ;t c: Introduction of now species of anirnols Into +' an areo,.or result in.o barrier to the migration or movement of rnirtwls? d Detexloratian to existing fish or wildlife habitat? . 6. Wise. Will the proposal result ins a. increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? � X 8. LcM'.Use. Will the. proposal res;+slt in`6 ►xb- ,' stontial alteration of the present or planned land use of on area? X 9. Natured Raourc=. Will the proposal result Ins a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? .W�L 117 i w .... ... .... ...+. t..r• r.....,.�Mi .t y4.".r. 4M 1.1.t. ... ..•,'tt a } p ���t, �'vf � �,• r r e tt R ' iffy � , �R l � t wr Yes , kr Nk) b, Substontial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? .,._.._ ...X_ 10. Rini"of`t vwi t." Will the Proposal irWaNts a. A risk of an explosion or the release of fmardan substances (Including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals ov radlatimi) In the event of an accident or &Vnt cor;ditkm? .�...... _..X... t b. Passible interference with an emergency. Jr- nry pion or an e t"Icy ev+ocuotlon X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density# or growth rate of the human population of an crea? 12. f•"ing. Will the proposal effect existing hairs- 1, in or create a demand for additional housing? X.,, t, 13, . TrcvportcKWCircvlatlom Will the proposal result ins ! o. Generation of subsiantlal additional. �y vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new. parking? c. Substantial hippo upon txisting transpor- totion systems? , . X .�...» `` d. Alterations to present patterns of Girculo- �. I, tion or mm-ement of people and/or ? R e. Alterations to waterborne,' roll or air traffic? ;..,,.�. .....X r i� f. Ineroom In Traffic f cmords to motor s vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ; „ ,X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal hava an effect upon, or result In,a steed for new or altered governmental services in any of the following craas% a. Fire protection? �X b. Police protection? -..w C. Schools? � i _._._.. 119 1 �.S ......-....-._.-.. ..._. .......�.._.__.....«... «. ...,s.-,..+......,........_.......•............�uw.vtirfa*.+aaa✓+.a.•wc,na+r...T.. 1 i i Yes 1�40►2 No d., Parks or other recreatimal facilities? c. „M01EteION of public facilities, including roods? ..X f:°� 'Other governmental services? 15. "Energy. 'WIN the proposal result In: .. .:. . '. ' a: Usa of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. • Substantial increase In demand upon exist-ing *rces of energy, or require the development of new souran. of energy? X ' Id. tAllities. Will the proposal result in o need for riew systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gos?. X b.' 6mnxxrications systenu7 _X C. Water? a. d Sewer or septic Tanks?. X' �..__. . Storm water f. . Solid waste and disp6a6l7 17. , l�iirrx» Health. Will 'the proposal result ins e:. 'Creatlixr of health hazard or potential -health hazard (excluding mental health)? x �.•• - . w��r iir�r. MIYw� L b. Exposure of people to potcntioi health hazards? r...,_ 10. A"tivfics. Will the proposal result in the obstrwflon'of any scenic visto or view open to The public, or will the`proposal result in the creation of,an aesthetically offensive site open ►:- to public view? + X '. r9. •fzacrexrtlon. .Will the`propoml result in an Impact upon the quality or quantity:of existing Tecreational opportunities? X Gu1Mnd ITesanas. _...__ a. 1A7i1 the proposal rewlt� in the alteratlois + of crti the destrucfkxi*of a prehistcric or -' ' historkrarchaaologw site? X '{i'x'?T:ar.•`71.'.'!t`.- ,+.y,. ..r ... .7-....,. �L; -.,a:a:.+::.:sw:L. :.l.i:......•.t...... . ,:::..:,k.i1...t:.",..r 7 •••'r� �(4 •t I3 ,+ • '+.)'�° �+•{ J , 51 , ... ..1,; 7 ♦ •' '�'/•/.J','l�./� t74bN.V'✓F"�it ' t. Y • ' s Yeas /►+Say No be"• Will the praprrsal result In o&erse physical • or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, shvcture, or object? ;� _X _.... C. Dams the proposal havv tha potential fo cause a physical chamle which would affect untrue ethnic cultural volues? __x•__ •r: d Will fhe proposal restrict existing religious or sacred was within the potential iaract area? X_ 21. M�tory'Flndings of Slgrrificcr►cc. o. Does the project!have the potential to degrade the quality of:the envii iiment, substantially reduce the'habitat of o,ilsh or..wildlife specie', case a If isli'a'4lid- " iife'•populotion'to drop below -vlf sus- �' ' `to;.iing levels, threaten to eliminate a •' plant or;onimol community, reduce! the' nn mbar, ar, restrict the range of-,a rare or ,• ..• : .,.ndorVered plant or animal or alimtnate in'portant'exaniple:s of the major periods of Callfernia history or prehistory?. ; y b. Does the project have the poiential'to nchieva short-term,.to:.tF.c disadvantogo of �y long-term,'environmental,goals?.;.(A 7shiri. ++ term impact an 'the environment.is ane t.+ which'.occurs in a'reWlvely brief, definitive , period`•of'time while.long-term impacts will endvia well Ir,"o the futurta F c. Does'the"pr`oject hwce tmpaas whlch'cre Individually limited, but:cumulatively con- siderable? ,(A,proj;Z may Irrpoct.on two or more•separate resources'where'the impact on.each resource: is relatively small, but "where the effect of the total of thaw '.impacts on the environment is stgniflcant.) _„ d. Does the projact have environmental effects which will'cause substantial adverse effects • ! ` on human. beings, either directly or indirectly? x _ ill. Dixuasion of Environmental Evaluation IV. Deteiminartlan r (To be completed'by the Load Agency) 120 • i •� ,f� �y t 1 � 1 r f � �r� f y x � ' � .�• u l� ,rS• l'' � t ' t I On the basis of flits Initial evaluations Y� find that'the*proposed pro ject'COULD MOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find thnt.01th61j66'fI1e proposed project could hove a significant effect on the 'environment, there will not be.a significanf effect in this case .because the mitigation measures describes an.an attr-hed •sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECI,!,jIATEON WILL BE PREPARED. • 1 find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envira}- ment, and cn ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT required. 010 X �a13 to t For (Notes This Ii ,only a suggested form. Public agencies are free to devise their'own format for Initial studlesa a y i :S "�. 121 .4 f. S ' :_°�111'!r•'+F.wsT*11v...-.r... , .'°.rM .....5.}-.- :,j':'..:' .... .,..i.:..•.,. ....:1.S...J.i.r.,�i..:.r•..n. ...,..........�......»,.,..raria."i.r,t'..,^•.:«....ii.0 -° � i j#'J ! 1 i I , .t RXPLANATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS lb. Soil displacements and compaction may occur as arterials are realigned. (Ellis Avenue and Gothard Street) or widened (Pacific Coast Highway) . lc. The grading of new roads may alter local topography, particularly in the areas of Ellis Avenue and Gothard Street. 2a. The proposed changes as a whole may result in' inereased trip ends, vehicle miles traveled, and air emissions. ► 6a. Increased' traffic may increase existing noise levels, particularly ' Pacific Coast Highway. 8. Arterial realignments (Ellis and Gothard) may alter planned land uses because they create new logical boundaries to separate uses. s 11. The proposed changes may allow for population growth in areas not now adequately served by roads. 13a. Roadway-widenings'", raising arterial designations, and providing other. street improvements will .substantially increase vehicular, movement, part icularly .al,ong Pacific Coast Highway and the Beach Boulevard corridor. 13►s. Increased traffic on Pacific Co- st �Highwiy may create demand for new parking facilities in the downtown area. �13c. Increased .traffic on Pacific Coast :fighway will.lricrease vehi6les in. the downtown- area. Transportation ,.improvements in, the Beach Boulevard. corridor: may increase the volume of -vehicles in the area and/or alter transportation modes. 13d. The proposed realignments and changes in designation will pro- vide a more efficient circulation system for moving people and goody. 13f. Increased traffic may subject more motorists to traffic hazard. 14a. The ,realignment of Ellis Avenue will improve Fire Department response time. 14d. The realignment of Ellis Avonue may impact active recreation uses in Huntington Central' Park. 14e. Increased travel on the..City's arterial system will increase the need for repair _ =I 15a. Increased traffic may increase the demand for fuel. 16e. Ellis Avenue and Gothard Street changes. may modify existing drainage -.swales. Widening of Pacific Coast Highway and improve- ments 'along Beach Boulevard may require modification of the existing drainage system. -�r.,•n...1,Y. ;ru�.:i;:J.',«..�At.:Cti p.�•a:zs., '✓lr; .. .,•,... ...... ,..w.. :,..:4 .,,.. .q.-.......- _,.....,...t:a..n -c.S a:S.Ti 'AG riC?SSj`^wt • t ' 4 ' 1 i l r i r f♦, tr h 'r' .}t+ Ws �{�t {r ``l yr {'1!firb5. My t y ► ; r l ,{` �� •t. ,�,�� � ,lv ? 4 �rt�' r •s ° 4��O�w �;. .���� ,� {' rr:•.s �.�' rr A • r 0+ � r �f� "� 1 . WI; � � s� � tr t 'rj r it S�'�,1� ��r {� \ '�� ra .� ti {�{��y',f � �./ � ,j�, r w � •#G! �}8�4rS� �� ;Ytti ,��a�s'1 �4M} ,• � •�r��!'�.. '�, .�.1,"ani h. ,r� q%.t. .+ir61L�rk 3 v: r `�tt,r •l •.Y,..it. A ��,+� 'Y.ce r .1«.. r ,fit, ♦. p • - • • archaeological t ♦ • edge 1 i• � l S ' r r. C` { W i• + r .,M h*J4 i 4 1 � A. 'i 1 f �4 l`rr �.k 9 hr, t•:17 1 4 1. i a 7 ♦; ''•h r4 �.1 a :'i• 1. - r r t Y h i•. t, ° 1, a. h 1. t o 1 1 r + + �, 4,r. tk 5 +{ b, 1 :`1� tf 45r �ti t .r.r` h f' �, 5 1 f �,r�„ + 1 �,. �, 1�;r<'�,i 1 #a r {, �.•r• r •�, �, _ •y � � r.' .. # r#�r � '� � �"shr r v f�: ,,� a : ( � ts•�r M ,� ,. - \ /�Y. ( r •l� T r` '+� � S�� j�,.� f r,� Z♦rr'� , �2a�4. r ♦. 4 .'� �,aA r.,� •Yi♦ �..•.' t .. ` •�r ,' ., ` � ryq` L5*SI. •r ,� 1t i�} ttti`li '. �• rt'. h�,.4�\ h1!1 l , ,+�r.?e�•r:, +� f �L; ;� �r�♦ ( T 1` '� t1�' ,,. • 1 », '{ /j y , /. .�•4 i, 1 j. .YfI t, r•i. . .•�r�.�►- 4r 11 ., . l' r a �1 r} J t ;}f.!�i�J•�-'`y # fr Xb� r.r r,,, � 7'"jt � rir Yf A , t r �( �ys,� ! �„ i �tt .rr(} .• ���s1ft1 \ftl�j;��` � � ,tr 4 ',•/ it t ylt � 1 '.+�} ,}ak4 ti . r �� } �r r.� � y.� �r r,rf•t444 I � t lly � .� :', r,, 1 �` ` r"r Y+" r ti t ' rl ,� a , it ►f5 >, r+,� h r 1 F '♦!. t A .' t t n� y x • , roai .{.• ; �� 1 r r„ iy r. 1i } ..r Y �Iy�r� 1r# t;tii�! .,! �'� iM'3� �r ,1 ,� a '.� .j•�' +r f� ' .tt 1 S'F•r`.k'�M 1'� 1{�, 5� t -�S t r l t {.x ', �.n ry rl'1 +� + r� �r rlti It 1 .r p .^� ,. 14 k} �.'4 � Nr P /rv1�1` Y �•,• ' � d'ILj S 'h ♦ � �.•tr i{y �.,i r (y, Mrr\ �.- 1 'rI Lg' �5 u t r1 f' f A ! r • t }�' tt,l M�! c+ 3 '1�:.t1yti a l' y $.y w ' k r I+r a*1,•1 S" t {tS y} yr;1 y r�� 7 Y ikYr' ;�j� k f t r� l t�r ,i .�� "A•s/ ; �'.. }� a'�L �( �IiA ?. Yri 4,v1�4,, w✓,} � �5�(+ �� 1 5 r ,+"j 4 wh'l S, f� �r •, � r t kr i� /rl �#r/ �� �'` r� r q y 1 5 L rr •, . t � ' 3 -(•. ♦1� � {)+`�+ v�..."Lr i� \rj� h ,!} - �," 1 V •�1�/�. i, a r a1� 7 1 a a altr't�t, c:'r }Y�1.ra 4{� 4. t r n l ,r kkr}1�iit�rp•,�i • � � ::r�. \11� � � �1�'�� t a �v + � ��; \ tAr� r.� 4 ,'� �,.4�. U a .r�i'�+ y +y�� •�,'tir }'tt.. a r \r ( i t ,.� 1� ,lit`. ,!. v; T 1. fyti a►A r tiw�j{ki1Y 1, At^tF� +'•�,1 ,'1 rI j .n„ rr .a+'i ��,: ti I.t ♦�.. ,...' y S .1 ?�1, � ..} �, r �'..N ?`:.'. s ,•r;�,,t•�;: ,r �r -,'ram 'r1+' :� �.� ►, a, r'�• .+, .•• ,;�•:',�t, F,' '� e,l� s ilMl', •IT yak�: it L7tVy� 'S '7". 1 fit Y �tI i -f t� t� ' '� k�r► .�7�s�.• � s .irF��� a��r' :�?, • i •�� �t t�+' 'i I + F I' 4 s� i P, k ; APPENDIX • • • • F:�Pti t,p•r h� 9 r . ��f `* � S{ � � 1�' R S, " 1 1 t • „�r.,y 1�.,.•r �...+! d rl i 4 11,. { -ti.: r nd, ,� i.M !.� � '! . 41 +I•r �.' r � r � � ; ,'� ,,� + ;j, } {.. .art , . � �''. , r �` 1P ! •� r �� tt � J. � 'fig M ,,� •. tr T '' h '�", ? ,. i Rr1 ,iti �, t r ','lr J( }i ''t r� .Y�' k f! ! .'}t r �.�, �.• 4 'i rf. � '� "i� 4 r 1 � � � f' jt•� 4^'l;t. • ',t w + , �� 4 �;wl .?I +" f4 ` 1 0 `,! ��t � .{, 4 �w.if� 4�rt f; A• + 'u� ` Y Y ♦ { �'.t. °�.�.••. Ce �,♦ +i, tyr ,�« " „ 1 1 :4r' `S� � yr t ,.4 � r r � I,►F y 'r � ��, •; - °'tf t; { � ! + ' 4 r F �' � '��� �'#�.:tf i� ?�., 4t 41 �; � r y� k ,,�+���•S,r....7 4 '}�ti ! 1 �Y„'tYtCkti,,;^'.�it d'.r�. i0. ��.;� S°E«`'x >R � '•���wi t t; r , �j{','. `7,s� f,`�j�ir '��t �.,, t e „Y,�}v� •r. � �� '�,� 2 •.i�t-�";v f 1 h r� 1, ' '{ � .4 r 1 �.i�� �,f' ++ 4;+I:i k r F , ! r � -�Y � ', r ,bl r t 1 � a � l ^+ + � i � 4 ,• r r.S _y, t, kr j. ..� 4 , ,, �'" • 4 } Y, �t F1X) ,;..11 b t� �4 1 r t i/ �! fr' 6gny/ w !�,}�ti !4+; r��Sl�4l',`�' ��,•f x�`7^ rhw �•,i' 7 '.rp r. 't r w w'.�,, ,r, All v tt�,2 t„ 1 .1�-,. � .'� 4, ati.; p � r n` 4 {Jy.+C "•i`�tA{,.. h "11�1 � � \ IM�rt\ ?ir'�+Y} �..},,t p:;'.1�Ij �I '7.�'}yti5i VA y vt^� h,�',� r7y�j 4`1,`x� *r"tJ/ �, '.!' '•. vl\��"4,",}�Y �Fl t;`;fA»+t�'�}:�tiij p1.{�'ftt,v'3'' t M1, �� ,'�'',4} `;� ,i�j.k 1;�1,�+•',t1, ' ,��Y�,,� .7���'�;r 4 7�Lr,t+lv �-,�Ar ��.�}.��r�s x:3�� .�i�lti �,�"'�$!��Y7,a"1�tirl�,�}'[`�•,,'��� w >r�,�{.1yv ,,•+ v t ! !t'^ .e. M S} tg2.t 11 Z �+ .k.,�x. ,�•i�,t t 4 y� {A},;t., �,n it, �,'IR] l ,f'�t 1"'',`�� 1^�'�1;� �.th�<'� r��•t•�- '�,z �,S �'Y � r} �i' �*y41� r,,�'.f� 1�.��'a F� �''�� l r }" ���h '�� ��, i. S;1`. .ia 1 ,tiSX� s. �1,^- �A .�•- . l'l',�iS' ��yjl�,'�T:�La4 ��f><'tti �I,w"• � .R}st +�{,�` `�S�' �i�31 lrr�, �r i'1 R ,� , r ■ t y. � .� ,, � t. ° P7+ � � .. J ti\+f� tli 1�• ♦ j y » � '" i,1fi;Jlt,1 { �v�r "',���� :t, S j` �, �rF�- 1 '� '� �� p;�'� p.+'�-�,�r�� {r l} .;ti>�d-i'�{1}l'" �'1�.�VI,;�y�9�t •.,4 �$..}(.' � .l`�`1i��Y�J` i � I'..�',. t Ir� ! ',��k '��lY r. j G,'{r!. k�`r F �I,"� .{ 1 :•# +4 r. r��'`C."" +k,l.'4"4t ,���• D�* '�+'�fl r.",�• '^li{" "r' ��. r. .��.,.. •{7:-, *:f n�' ,,, t,7. i� V •F' ,t'.• V'�1. "af` ra' f{?.1. �„(� ..;/e".11 r, `�L ti? '�'�,� '�,��. Lt x +}, •� � p�" ��.��,r�~ (•1�� ���'yi ~,f.L+ +�1 l?�' 4'� ,�i� ���.1.'r�i1�"s�y :�- wt1�` •r ;?4e,[� ''� �' f ,t. Y ff • � i • J . 'i + gg :1 •• • -alp wkr6)4 •. ••- • •.' • a • • • •► • 1 e •• • —1 + sy- r '1 X. r 4, it a •t� a` + '`} � , 4 +1fr r t'7,7f'`.tJlt f79,h��h•♦, •. l ..{' /-i„1� '1 A'.' ;^',4 - l L�''. �. ? , �:_��+ ti,. h � ^•.yra",L 1 :,x`fN4 rCi� T4 71 s i�.n!if 7j 1...41 r 1 5( t + i,. ♦ � r r 1•y v 'ti F..,h t � .1t{r a � .i 1L'+ •• ti r + 1 'r�r y '• v '. r } 1 .'{1 L yY � '� 1 rx" + !r1 ,t4.� � l..� ' �y`.: 'it � 1+Y ,'k•a+r r, � � '1/ .. � i � �- 1 , f� t _ 4 (' r ,, r ;x r k l v ? IS 4. +i: M , + +..y47 �.t• r• �,•� 1,+ ,7 ,'{ - ., IS. 1 y � ,r��� .r� v }:,+.� r. r t C,. s �r 1 r.. rr ,� ,�s r L t l s� ,j ., r N .• •, , `rl ��+ 1 I F{, �J � y � r '+ , 1 rt.' j'�1 ♦ �.�.+* .1 5 �f'tl j. {1 1. ' , `Sr.'1 S41r � � W �_'1i �,4, .1` r �'� A�y� }}'!l�'' .-v���r.,��:►� �.. f yy �r',�•': ^T'.��4 i a LI t ,j� '� K�i":#t',d:�t•r 1 T4 .4 t 4 ;. • * .�'r Y+ ' r �`` � S'I,M ( �, +.'+I• - �,t �ir `,, ."t+k S 9 t� 4 X,i 1,".., }� t+ �y / ''f + �J47 ^f ry ,• �� r ! �4 .�;i , � k �+ h 4 k i 4 }rof t'�"►lr4 P�� t a ���, } �t� ik/ r.r4 '` �� t q' r� �•'; S r }fi++��i yyf'. � fin. :at+�?yt�; �+i� � Y''�i{ Ay a ! ,+ . r fl.t ��+<�;��•tir d �k.. .�!' n v ���t1 ���5 i� '4r"�?A P t ��y� �L,11 *7 . + k`.,• X 1+� i 'T : 'iM {r ♦.. i '< i, !Gt t,, ('_, r ,444� n 1 a1 r y� rFfl:3 .� 1,, t, f a w f ''V � �t fir' t •'. <�7 � y'' t" a14 1 t ..r s� � '+Sl r }, r irrh}" >ur ,. ,�; ., t �y. ylll `tyy4N14.1•, ,'r� �yK;' .a a• S ���y,L �1 t i i�. �,.f e Yr h \ , 'I-' _ 1 1 rJf� ���� {tL�'��.I.A/S' <+3 L( t L a P j# `"tt'S„ L �� t vo? ` * '�3!•.�h�rl �1` r + n +�� � , f'��,�j 1` 1�•p1 1 t w; �,, ti M 1 ,�+ �r+ .4, t , ir'�ti�,�3 •�;{!4C t +pl5 N r r+ .�4,7 h. � �` y i 1 �Hf.a } 4 t.,I C'+ 3�?' `��t fY, r� ��1 A�f ♦i' 7, n �y.. � t- r F a y. y,l,t. � � `C' 'v T\�.t �t.4't��. y r. :E•�}� ',tt e� rjt��j yf/s., Ty}tiv!`�.�.� .! � '�t'"a. t +�tt h� trr "h 'l*st tiw�,�-ar+- ".,.�`y. �rt . r^ k r �• ��'l�'-�' }��/41Lr � 'h., ti � .r��'%1 � �l a? � , r1 y�'A. ,r y$C �+3 . T"_ j i �,[t � 4, s � '�` .'��� �A\ trs,� � 1`� S�f( Y�it �y +T''��•�� t �� ��}o) ti��h' rr((kk(('�n. �. 7 ` �.�, t i t i� •< •r1 /r• 4r� I r h +SL r+ s �1� Y� Lei'Y1 { r f t t7 bbb � � 4,� � 4 � � t f a f 5�t.��.ati; � �•'M1�` '1, ll,ti�.S.��S �����71r !ii •'/1 xtL+r q 7-�1', S.}�,�, h , +t"s J t"iy t `1 t s,,,, tp> "1 �'H;"i ♦ �r ij, , �"t � f a 1 U�I�k.+rlv{y 4 , + d 1 c •�a •1 'a.X't• !r 4 1• M, ��.: 7 +� ,� 4 �r4� n Mdi � t ���.� , L_"�1r �.�,.i ? +� 7t1 4• �,ir y� ,a, {✓. t,�s ti r � 1 -�; '1 ,����' " a, f <-:.,� 1q�: i a, r r' ��s f„ t '�t �' k „�4r.�,�;�,~ a t'i a{ta:lr. +� t,f; * h y � t+ �i' Y .t" 1 � • +4 ��YI�.•, !•ly '1� a� �` L .� ,�e 1 �� ��� '� t�� I:!sl �^-t',?�a +1;�-'t ggf1+�, .bt 4 '�';V� �r 1 j�� �� �'4 � �/ +?,�y�h ��.�.•�� h i•r �� ,i•,�p�'�� ��'R� .1 i K,.F. *� i1 ! rr t{Il:�1`;.3 r �y ��r'h�f-� �ik I S '43 • .� ! ;Y y •t�.'.4 ti•l Fa tt••.LI'r'" `yi it(�•`�v,:•rly r�':'•d'I.- t+� :i.h.�r \i s U �* j� r r �tir3ir t ,Y• r ��4 a t' F{ l �1 t y r1 Yr: fi.�"' { . ,�+L v 5 q� at ,� t 3 ' 1 � er�'t�]+ + 1� � r , I + �,• r rt• �� /, a�/ SI'r`{��•t�, y{� ,���,A ,..}� r� {��'C' t/ i'j•#1, � }� �� � 7 ''� ^� � � A ••{S�Sr �pc. i," i � t �f�rW � • � 1' r•/A�.• a % � 4 � �,R � �• { 7� ,� �7 hit F�i'Ij r ` �`" �..� I � r, '' G' Gr rL�• .'�� xy s �'� �. �1 � �\ �2 � " � }� r'I �� .� t4 ttv �,•. .,fit �% ;, r n 3 . .i .':d " •�: 1 � `�, �'�} l Pr. �1, t, t �x s 4' • z - ,r •r, V 7'{I: 1 1 i t • • • fI • • t 1 x • I l • • f I t t • 3 1 off ' t • f • • i • ■ t x • • • • • :I• • • t t • • • • — t• • — • • • 1 • i S • � •r r • i • S • � , 1 v :4 i .,4, 14 �i _1. r� , t^- r,4 y�,a�l•t �, 't?� " �Ir`, 3"'tts , � , .�tr� r, �,;•. r a ,�\ ...r '1a + ,' �r,.� VI ��..'.#��y \� T r.v } {' !1..� � #:• 1r�rm AI � r �i 1 .� •.1 L({. .'\, .: !)1 F"...f,.' r'r� :�� 1 ��t.M1 w . � , Y � ate t�Y, y,..1 J, � �i L• Y 11>;y ,4 '`at,tr '1 Ir a �+�: r ��, "!, � _ 3 t'+Mti,.,4 '•"1 ry.•�� �!' , ! * r I (r� -y., S t 1 ,t •a•r 1 ,V{ + �r 1 1 `1Y 1, �.i; 1 y ' r ( �t Ah, `f '. 'I .t .+ • } Yt',. A 1y �' 1 A� 4 y t( t ! ;+I tni��• I �r',*�i�� ,. * / ;, �' �4r t 1,1' �;t'•'t � ,.i�,� '',, `l;� r4 I ti. � :d. • t r � a :� � r. 1'•, \ ��� 4 �' :.. l., �r Y ` r 1 L .4rr ry�^Mr� �� N '"" 4 yr')• tt'Y , r.�n � � � C} C •' �t .. ..#a :Y �r.I r f ,., v 'S tr.\.`Jf � ^,�'t;(((i� fi�#1" R ft�.4• � 4'� �� ��si �t L • S i r I 1 •{ 1 t i �, s !_ ,;,{� ,+" �.��;r S , . / 3 1.k"• 1• r . 1' '.�, t �t't 14 �, d ry}yyr � , y RL,�15����j ti ( ,#•1 T ,r �, t ,� w �,r � r ( �.11 f'". .,1.,.!1• In # ro Al (S +J � h 5}}� 'i+Fl,.a •4'tt �.1 { �7 '1 r, `\{ � iYt S'� �S#1; +�� t�-. �yi,. /•\ '+ i��,+tq�``�'���r{ n�Rr�a�J, A+ `�.:} 1� .� �.,y'S ..�4 "•^i r+"rC�<�' : r r- t�• (.4. + 44 r! s A{ ��ti� a�. '!a t,. �i < �� ,,�'�' lr..jt,yt���'• �. �. � ,. # s..#R ��� k �tiC 1<I,`� T��' � r 4 �' •7�k. w r:J � ti,l f � 1 1 '1' .,, '4 4' f' ��h i� � � � 4 � 4�. I �v `F�u'R� A,t`t'2�iAr �� hj At #t 1 ¢ r , .. r,' r t •I�i y.�tp. {•� # ^, I r n 4y ItA. L,�u"... '+`?n\•� ,rr• ' IJ } '( 1 a. l Y k S, �''l.+ A 1 �'!y II;� 1 S T:� '� ,� .'� Z'j!r i �f. ��;y} �" `.��,;�,t 4�r'�rr�\F i ,,//�; "+• :yt�'h,t��iy!t' L I� � ;1♦.. .�� }#,1i ,�1 P;, �,3 �+ t'�� X` � t �I, •w!� .t �'f,+,'r.t��t�s�'�r••`` 7 � ti4. A'' / 'f t�t # • C4,^ 't'1. Y �!� .{ y� a�{ {,� N 'L ��1 `y1� ,f}�+4�: �'i••r 14 L r E yr� •.: Sy'rr".!,� R�t ti,�� 3•, 1� t 'Iqt ,, ,aw •i ,Y:.��'Yap �;yt#Y ',C144:1 ii L+' {ti# 'ir' rc :SSa'' �S#TtRI t t t' Y L,, n Sy' , + v #�,i , ',IY"1��� \. { r i { e k � � Y a r'•li• 1 1 }jy�,"�i��� ��4•` r�'f!'#y���. ( "'Iq�11l! /}'� ,�T 'k�f., R;1 ;,1�'r' `{��lw}� �R31�,, 4�'�'r'{'�1 >• A�.�a k •,.��}^,,r`� �f}��'y•� ai1il•` �� ,� �•,tl 1a`�r�7f*h(,t �` ��;t�i )�II',!1:},'1�(.� 1# ,•.'tn'�� 41 �'r S a3i rt�Sh1�,1 �'k;�I.,r. t ,��,tj,�r51'' a'�ltL'��w1'••�' �•k�.�",'.wr, P � � ), ,• �` n `.r 1 t t ,y 5 , M� ° < �, ! r ; :. F k 1�X 4!I't'" e .�y . IJJ j} i , �+ 1 wA, ,• r t' � c y r t� �►', tyy y7't; -. Y �ftq\f1� r - v� GC rrl t{IJ., 1 >� %�}}w ^.i1" , 1 � w , r ,t,}1 i 1 }tr j�1 i ',.I 1• •�':f d� �;,,t �•.. 'Ry j ..� „y,..� �'`', �lai; ,.Y�y •,+•C5 �I'." �.iJ��.�, lt,�:.�7�Ifqq ,L :•a51 ,{rN{ " a ?a :,•1� II r;. r r. dt� y'•e;�r.� 4'1a 1 ti. 1+Y' ,'�,�• "�! � 7�4 S s�; P I. J+ ^ 1•...1 ,S. .�cy t�' 11""r, i. {ti�•.{l�a'•�'�? i�'lC�c a.A" ,t'" �4. 't..�•, ut,.�n .#,4;r. n '�:r. ' t[,. ''1;''. M',:' e. ."1 S. y1' ,, •ihyi ��,� 1 1 V''i" - kM't4 S e A i�i(C!y. 1y Y• �r•� S h4if. k:R� i 1 ��y. .iil. �,...V.'�ylt,if'+.' t .tl� ,!r ,4 T'"Ct=;a� � r '�'. MM•��,�y��,'� +��i+�'• ,� j K�� ;A�,'�' . 7,V cS� �'77a'' ;�{t � '�, �L � ��T�1�."'�, f �• • •,f�, �r4 li r w."��� i. 't.!'�'l •��� 1�y{ �`�'�'!t�� �i 1 Iaa ���'1 A �j•F � 1 � y� a � V� 4 A 3°• �!� �'� �;� r �{;)h i' '� t'+ y*,t' 't �'�'. t f � ,,4�' � S •'ti� d'�S'�� �' ,it + �r � r F�"1� � ��'4 � �� * � ' ���,}•it1 , LRI r /t' • ' t a 'try at /!• • ••• Ra :+' • t • t a y. • • • s a • s • r • r • • t r s • • • • t • • • u r : a L - • • r w r • 1 s 1} N a n., at 1 . �E. IN yl. ¢S{s f.1kR ,,r s.�� .�,,``.tiy, •.i1.4 1� "'' 1f+ 1 J " '+ y,1"'a!'•+'L 2, , .!•c', .�.r^ a r,. •', 1 a 1 r A 3 alt ! r�•,: •� R.1: 1 '�j 4}. try k -Y 1 L- L, , ,,r, 1 y�.�'i a•Clt�c'.�.t: ,; G t a•:r 4 J 1.�:i .rt •Yid ., wr� , r 1 f , , �, �• .4 I.t1.•�.If y � }t»- ��' �''i• l� '�il�! 1 1'�`' . t, f ii} L' t 1;. 4 1 5 9 k 4 yr.�- .:p f +`:f i 1 u� ifr 1 ^., j .' � ri`' t' ► y�Llr.i�n f �'""re'• h.� ' �'1� ih.r a4 r r uwM y: 1 I Y+ v M,�,.`1 1.,. � Yr A' 1 SAr. , .-�, .y,r.:a f.':y��• - �. Yr .- � �.' I .yrr7 r.r- yr Ii q r >>. yf,,•1:' ,r �' rr + � i .� y ,L 1 la 1. • ,.. � !'*., t`1��., 4. � L *r ,I A 4 r-,y1 ° f {/, • !, �t 1 ,t .{. � � 1, ,i P i - }} �. ! � _ i . f k. }, ...� ±. 4 }r °�+ � �• t! 1 !i; � `��;�J! 1 i• y 5..',.f � 1�"'� I. . � ' .A� � L}.U'" ,� 1i tj. a+ `a 1 It+.•N� �. f``!�i.Y ,�`I� �„' 1 + A, 1 I.F y�.`�*o r, _r� " 7f.�C�9�:L� •.'t� x�' a,5 }���Y'•t 1+ij •y(- 4 �. -, r �„ .r_•� •f�4=`i t y 'rt.w •.�`�N. ,,Tar '�' �, �+� t �1-yy,}fa +I a.{: �`4'S+k+' :!� r L `� 1 I.XJy .L k ,� •,.� r+'71,��,.! l�sr r.' r�4'jy, a tq t �I r '�f. ,Y rt�1. � h �,i h`I�>.-, r ti �a Lai �a a � ,�-ft ,•, � , d'k `"I�ft - j ` i, y,s t 1 � "�It 1 *�'tl � tr^•f{,t° t arl 1t .\ ♦ tll ,i R°}• 4 +r`�.4 r1 la: lr�"� fl.. stir �* f L �• '�I'•f•frr',. Lj► f ky L,S�n ,.. ,4;r YS Lt 1 ' � �'� L r�fFS.� 1;�I�. V'1 ! ,1 � �Cr ,, , r . ,.1, t:x.,. tr r�� y, Y � ;. �}, r.. � ��f r� ,tom, r •. +y71 A .. �.,��.d/' ► r.'�{F�rA f y1 .►, +.l ytt,,lar *[ � �M`i,:+ 1� i1' '�t'' M:`�:��j 'A!' i''}����i�l"yltl r':lc�r'�l„ L`.;�- �;'h.S+,r l.;,. , 1 44;.1•r t ry t�' [ l+r+ `tit r , I .•. L a.�� y} rl +f•5r ,ty� 44 '' 9 I�'�1 .4';,. \�+iil f yKa`: , ! l �ti:k� .Ly, a�a i.y��L 1,,I,h a ..� t �.�,�I)r� ;"• `� ,,t s ''?K}f�j,'4 �'t_t,:l, j .i.< ,11 'if(r�� , t,-I L� .1 ,a L ti Y�t S r� �,•) 2 i • � 5?�l w iw� s• ,,1 . tr any I..��,//ry} (JY n�a' .I�tir ftt f1r'.}�Ii�.3 .A�h�' �ttE �2., ♦r T,,�aa}Y Sh�' a +JF It 4f ;t"� 4. r* [ +' "� 1Y, "t9*,K j' 1,'�t A''(� i1 7� � f'- A 1� � f,'e`:y {M`71 {�\ '1 , ).L ti� r•� •'� R^ f � i i• �ti� Y (• +. !:5 1' t 54i w,K '•1 S )�) S'l a} r r 11,� { + i5..# MI ;�{iv.. ,ti...:f••+ ,+". 4..1', a a�r � Q� 41y �� �' t 'r4i♦ t; t �a,i lly{ ff xt'4 ft 1r ' j aMl1(Jll"t +'t` }Jr � pR"fSj�h , 1h1� x t fi� r'�x� ¢al'f1Ay'! k f�,+"1.{ �+ • � ii !' 3f�M �'+ k► k ���4. Y L f f..4 1 9�t r, .1 T� {� �t�,!� ���"''1 w. !1 '�'�a4 , tL k3�� ��Et �}t ,`''� h'�7t(� f �.t>{�t 1 f2�t+ ;'� tir ♦,�� 1�. ��i ff�4.4ti....,'tr}�3�- r`..�;, irtffl, #� iwh�r,,�+rY�h �� ~rt',� a �,�L •j,�r �` �,:r '� {�.t�p �a �� '�`` ,t'� A' �., �� ' 'rat . }I'��*�L,� �:', ������aa'"' n iL .�A8 � t'tr.y"�llt�F /YY tilF'rr" `r ,y^al 1 � !!M ijr•� ` '� r le a F � • 1;:. �r �;tl t }1.i /,Ytys"`�IYt��j{ r�• � ,�fe,�tti! �: �f,' r � r +•,. ��Y (�� r ' t �, ,��r'M i�r ���r�Sh,�,"�• l}�'�"� �:.. K '7 a+ ��i ��� r'� tt.'!� Zz •M r. � f 1, , , .I� ✓ �Ivh /11 4 I r tl{r'') Y`1 + t ti t�' ''�� +�,*,, �' .• 'a S�� 'f� i ihL■h'a �tt,��, � yV� �k I i;��1�'��('"^''° .t' F �+ � "��„�� ���i S t.L� 1 r' �`'-l� \�rt`11;:r.{� Yk..`i �' -F�e�at F �r �1. �j�+ Af , N,t� � iYl ;a�y�,Y' �f�• ,� � R : �<•3� iy !Y!i ii'•1 ?,"����, . ��+;.Lr t• . 'b' '�`Lrr t .;r r}. t as ar 11 '!1 � •� "T cr'�i..IM �d J�1`I'a��`'r� �t�� � r�'':✓'S'.�'��:�'•li1),��i�''1s�.�f:�,s� �;�,'}�`'� 11G�J� PY� f,r�x { k,•try+�,�jd��� 1 �����'�,e�t141�+`n ��`���i''#•���f t �h ,t:���'J i;'a".•'r r'3'1 •••e.a+:>Z�i�`-+�4 kt•r�1N.' R '�)':�•li;,f_ii C; r'� 1t•�"XL C' rkl.,�•},S*":'iy'L�,rc N�;, at,r A'1.t•.'7''�. 'F. 7.r, �: • r ` r , M L,lti ' f . .'I- t.15.rti' rt r >) 1 } t i,ti' ,j .r4. .'.1 L. +�y'I�+l.:x'•.f;' �i�.': R .'i� f /N �ri� 'l� R r �''N, fLijk,�.,.:y,i1�t'i'•?�..1�._ii�.t.'.r•� .'L" .�i..�_!ti,•. i �,•'as Y "6�' ,i 1 ' t • ,r t. �•:kty;,l�t!'^.�'�kii �r�.��:.;.t,,'1.,t�.c:7,,31 • • • • t t r, t T� .�C r • - 1ptr 11�r(`1F: t*ant ti��'4y�64.fr t• • • • - • - • • ,+`�.. Ir{ ,� � 1,-MIT, �#+1 F • Y' t F''� y 1 � • � A 14� ��3 1 rr", rr�L��"t �,.r � pr.•, tP&JIM Mom Li r, iy k `� ft 1•; � ,� �r ,.�!>ti a., 1.4" Ft ll,,r s 1 '. 4 ry',�?rx r l fit`^ �i]•�'� �I� ��TM a e',c� 1 �k•���� e}�•�� 1 ��t� j4 4 L '1 J s`( f r .h. t,�• i .14.''y..l r i 74 IL r t � �l {••''YI '' f. x)A:j> }. I •r. �` 1 YI { ► i" •'1 x' S 'r. c. M '.�, ttf 1 y: ' 1'.. ?sr ytr l ':�.� �, y t. r :�atf �;r Y-.�,t ,� . � �r-� . }* ♦r r # '� i t� • Z , ?-s", •. �{ _ � y� �l i+, / y•i, 4 "•wr .�'+' �'� ' 4�� �. 7- '. ,{L{ '• J� .+, ~1 .4 /� �,! f aR'�7},.I, 1�1' 1 1' - !•�� 'a� t''( -'S�. r r- ,}�,� 4. l• .• �� y. , _� r. F= "��7.:t�.M1 .,t+� t •1 � ���'=2 .r 4� Y+i, +� ',AM-i�a'M' _ � •}.. .t�y�.�� .` .'+ '�. '•rT rI-.;.;;}It +:,r +cil t�'�r�.�,.,.� t4` i.:' 1'S-'.y. �:4' �•. ,x, ?. t '•� S ::r' .rJ' "i .1. _/"S. "•' r• '"ri n'•r1 T.�1.i .� � ' ...� � v t• � -";. n .';1: �., i �• ) ( M' t" f � .,+ •' '• 4 •',• :i t,i..ydti.4_ • _. ..t:��. �.•r�^c, .,t....�..:ti .�,r:�` ..•:��Yt.:c;SY}:,:� S�'.��1!_�{.i��`..�I�t_'��","'._:`�•�'4 stS!°}`a,-Li�S''•`1.�:�?Sf.��.Z:f'oC!..''�'�11. I , DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MURRAY STORM . DIRECTOR,EMA ` JUL 2093 RIOBERTO FISHER 4 . 01 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Z I s P.O. BOY. 190 LOCATION: 12 CIVIC CENI'En PLAZA Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O.,1oX 4o40 6ANTA ANA,Ca 92 i02.4g48 . MAIA INO ADDRESS: P.O.8•aX 4040 t ENVIRONMENTAL 61ANAGE6IENT AGENCY SANTA A..', CA 927,722•4048 PLANNING TELEPHONE: G S R 3 N 011 47141 034.4643 FILE 01011023 July 18, 1983 Mr. Hal Simnous City of lluntington Beach ' 2000 Main Street fiunt'ington Beach, California 92C4$ Subject: Draft EIR for City of Huntington Beach Circulation Element Amendment 83-1 - t✓ Dear Mr. Simmons: Attached .is a copy of the Agency's Transportation Planning Division memorandun dated July 14, 1983 containing camtaents on the Draft 91R. Thank you for the opportunity to review the Draft EIR. Please transmit a copy of the Final EIR to the Erivironmental 'Analyeis Divison when it is available. Very truly yours, &1fenirly . Norones Environmental Analysis Division )IF11 rj I e Attachment • I I .. -# Iwo To. F« W Olson hianagcr " �rtarr: W. L, zaun P or'r Er1iA DAr ;• duly 14, 198:i : rogram ,Manager /Cnviron mental Anu r sunacr: DCII; for City of Hu p.4tA lYsis Division Huntington 13 /1•ransportation F g each Circulation 1*le /•lood Contra ment Arnendrnc to 83 t1 `'�--�.., 1),v ry We have reviewed the Of H above referenced Huntington each gton D on 3 docu Proposed changesJune G, 1933, ment which the following Cln to the arterial higlrwa I's EIR sr received merits: Y ystun ddress from itsdt City in tluntin 1e impacts of sev�•ral ° The circulation gton [3each, discuss the ana13 sis f�r tie otter would trrpacts that ttfc Propose have dsh 1~11is Avenue connection of Tberi/Ellis am shows Talbert Albert endrrtcrit of the Ave1rue nuc east of Beach avenue does not c"Y, into `3S `7 continuous boulevard, to !:ills Connection Fountain b east-wc5 The 10 Avenue• c," °f Talbert Av alley, and t Prirnary arterial IntyIs f iP,1H si-west arterial enue to L-:I AverOss'fig the crossing. Reco (east of nue channelsSanta Ana River, Part have on gnrzing the !rn Reach boulevard) traffic toThe ' �oulcv the Impacts the i that doesnot a seconder aid, to lPrimery tandards aSnd UPI raysinbert alto Talbert ConneCtha e a y river f o !n Se parrot the g Ellis Avenue tOn would ciion 2,5,1� Pacific redo , east of the report states Coast mrnendedt?lte=native, l3eacli Pacific that if the r way-Sack-ground to tine sail ast 1�lrghwaY from proposed arnenti aund, Pau. , first Para�ra artta Ana lziver !s a a primer mcht to lac 30 Of Circulation y to a majd,r 3rtcr Pgrade the statusp t, Arterial Streets into PProved� ,This ial be contprrnance Would bring the twee./) Goldehwest a prirn,7r and lilgilwaYs" Theith,.,the Pe C!t joint Y trorn the. Santa Count 4r;n Count y s '!taster plan cfrrillation anal Ana River t Y s ASI AH Y Master Plan of B acir does analysis that the ° the we►stCrn Presently shows P Therefore paint out that a Count County line. CH as ► the Count n��t'or Y conducted for the � 1-1owc�vtrr the this "matter. Y would amend(!• designation on PCliity of Huntington its AtPA H following the C 11PPr6 ' Prime ec, action err RAiSrrntt w•— ferry -,'��- DT12.. ... �iSPort � nncit, Manager t�SCr 25(jt,41S) Tratlon ' annrn h Division vision } t 7 1 Y d R• ti� T .F" 1 �l �. •t• .�41