HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Approval of Bolsa Chica Issues to be Transmitted to the ZelcG�w-y,- P/ay)ni'r Art"
Council/Agency Meeting Held:
Deferred/Continued to:
®Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied Q� Ci lerk's Signature
Az�awCouncil Meeting Date: January 3, 2000 Department ID Number: PL00-03
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH :a
REQUEST FOR ACTIONNJ
s
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS =-
SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, City Administrator
PREPARED BY: HOWARD ZELEFSKY, Director of Planning tfzx41V41i
SUBJECT: APPROVE BOLSA CHICA COASTAL ISSUE
TRANSMITTED TO THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
REGARDING THE BOLSA CHICA LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue:
Transmitted for your consideration is a list of Bolsa Chica Coastal Issues to be submitted to
the California Coastal Commission for consideration during their review of the Bolsa Chica
Local Coastal Program.
Funding Source: Not applicable.
Recommended Action (Bolsa Chica Subcommittee):
Motion to:
1. "Approve the transmittal of the City of Huntington Beach original Bolsa Chica Coastal
Issues to the Coastal Commissiop as recommended by the Bolsa Chica Subcommitiee�
with the following modifications: (A, ,B,e, Q nd� ,D /na��o/�s �h Sro-MY-z&f
A. A conservation easement should be placed over the 43 acres of property formerl
kn wn as the Fieldst ne site; t add CoikSeRra,�;on ¢�¢menf a� bins
�RPP,eoveA -7-0�
B. A 100-meter Mesa top buffer should be required to protect the bluff restoration
areas from areas designated or development; f- b/oAr p eAime ej) e veal
, /As
9Yore) YC�trsta �0/� W rne� onJ) ana' an o�fier environa�&7
dt s j-,rc, areas . f .y
�RPfr-01e4 ��Zc/ien 6ACOP, 40)CreeV, No
F- 1
9
REQUEST FOR ACTION 0
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL00-03
C. Storm Drain Outfall Pipes: The City should continue to support the concerns
addressed in the letter sent to the Army Corps of Engineers dated April 7, 1998,
and recommends the Coastal Commission evaluate the following issues in the
LCP: degradation of the visual quality of the bluff and bluff face visible from
Pacific Coast Highway due to the placement of the drainage structures and the
bluff stabilization work required, disturbance to wetlands and wildlife habitat from
the placement of structures in wetlands and the water quality and velocity of
water to be discharged into the wetlands, and the potential water quality impacts
for the Bolsa Chica Wetlands and Huntington Harbour. The issue may be -
addressed as an LCP Policy,- Tess ooyy o�s�hon -k s-AaR m Cka"n
o s a FJiat . b AIn-r/%'�b y a/feer� irie, �+�✓fiaa�s of �/i-arcs,o„.
D. Ar�hadlo o - : the should require test excavations to determine the depth and
9v q
complexity of the sites and areas that are being written-off on the basis of
inadequate information. The LCP should require the information and artifacts
recovered from the date recovery excavations to be made available to scholars and
Native Americans, and interpreted for the public. The LCP should require the
preservation of at least a portion of the most significant sites so that in the future
Native American descendants c n restore and maintain the connection between the
people of today and the past." epa✓ED 4,3 pijl-en, Cdko".- ,/o�a"', /Vo>
Alternative Action (Staff Recommendation):
iirnnm-Atolly sepsiFivo habitat area /GC�_T-I;e Gity of W Atinntnn Ro�r+h
------------
Analysis:
A. BACKGROUND
In 1996, the Coastal Commission reviewed and approved a Local Coastal Program (LCP) for
the Bolsa Chica submitted by the County of Orange. The LCP limited development to 1,235
homes on the Mesa, and proposed the removal of the eucalyptus grove located on the edge
of the Mesa.
PL00-03.doc -2- December 28, 1999 11:36 AM
0
REQUEST FOR ACTION 0
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL00-03
Earlier this year, the Court of Appeal rendered a decision pertaining to the Bolsa Chica
Local Coastal Program (LCP) which determined that the existing eucalyptus trees on the
mesa cannot be removed, a 100-foot buffer must be maintained around Warner Pond, and
residential development of the lowland wetlands is not permitted. As a result of the Court of
Appeal's decision, the LCP must to return to the Coastal Commission for their review and
approval. The LCP is tentatively scheduled to be reviewed by the Coastal Commission in
February 2000.
The City Council Subcommittee on the Bolsa Chica met on December 3, 1999 to discuss the
seven Bolsa Chica Coastal Issues previously adopted by the City Council in August 1995.
The City's seven issues were presented to the Coastal Commission for consideration when
the LCP was originally reviewed in 1996.
The City Council Subcommittee received comments from the general public, evaluated the
applicability of the existing Bolsa Chica Coastal Issues, and recommended the addition of
two new issues that apply to the former Fieldstone property and archaeology on the Mesa.
The Subcommittee also requested an update on the storm drain outfall pipes and possibility
of the existence of vernal pools on the Mesa.
Bolsa Chica Coastal Issues
Listed below are the seven Bolsa Chica Coastal Issues approved by City Council in August
1995 that were submitted to the Coastal Commission for consideration.
1. Conservation Easement: a conservation easement should be placed over the entire
restoration area to protect it from future use as anything other than wetland
restoration uses. (The conservation easement should be required to protect the
lowland restoration areas, even if federal permits are not sought, are should and not
granted, or if the property is acquired by a federal agency.)
2. Mesa Top Buffer: the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Plan should include an open space
buffer, on top of the Mesa (along the bluff edge), to protect the bluff and wetlands
restoration area from the areas designated for development. The buffer should be
of sufficient width to accommodate passive recreational uses (such as bicycle
and/or pedestrian trails, benches and vista overlooks) similar to those planned for
the Harriett M. Wieder Regional Park (which runs parallel to the Bolsa Chica Mesa,
along the length of the Huntington Mesa at the southern most edge of the Bolsa
Chica area).
PL00-03.doc -3- December 28, 1999 11:36 AM
0
REQUEST FOR ACTION 0
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL00-03
3. Wetland Restoration Plan: the restoration plan proposed in the LCP is a well-
balanced plan which provides a valuable combination of habitats and will provide
winter eco-tourism opportunities to the City. Implementation of the restoration plan
should be careful to ensure that the tidal inlet is designed in a manner which will
have no adverse impact to the beach, public recreation or be detrimental to public
safety, health or welfare; that site planning of open space, parks, trails, ecological
reserves or other open space amenities maintain the relationship between Mesa
upland and lowland areas; and that the natural topography of the Mesa and bluff
faces are maintained by limiting of grading, terracing or other similar methods.
4. Mesa Top Roadway: the LCP should incorporate a buffer by a Mesa top roadway
which runs roughly parallel to the recommended bluff top buffer and separates the
buffer from development areas. The Mesa roadway would serve as a distinct
boundary between areas designated for development and public open space areas
and would provide public access opportunities to public open space areas while
providing additional separation from development and protection to the wetland
restoration area.
5. Cultural/Historical Memorialization: the LCP should include memorialization of the
cultural and historical resources found in the Bolsa Chica. Memorialization should
be provided through interpretive signage and displays which depict the Bolsa
Chica's history of oil production, use by Native Americans and the significance of
the site during World War II; these elements should be incorporated into vista
overlooks and small kiosks provided along the buffer.
6. Compatibility with Existing Los Patos Development: the LCP should designate the
Bolsa Chica areas, adjacent to the City, to a compatible land use and zoning that is
of similar density, type and scale to existing development along Los Patos Avenue.
7. Product Type: the LCP should reflect a percentage of single and multi-family units
that exists in the immediate project vicinity which is not less than 66.66 percent
single family.
B. BOLSA CHICA SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
The Bolsa Chica Subcommittee voted to modify two of the original Bolsa Chica Coastal
Issues. In particular, recommendations were made to modify issues No. 1 and No. 2 of the
original list. No changes were recommended for the remaining Coastal Issues, however a
recommendation was made to add an issue that addressed archaeology on the Mesa. For
ease of reference, the original Issue is stated first, proceeded by the Subcommittee's
recommended modifications.
PL00-03.doc -4- December 28, 1999 11:36 AM
. REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL00-03
Conservation Easement: a conservation easement should be placed over the entire
restoration area to protect it from future use as anything other than wetland restoration
uses. (The conservation easement should be required to protect the lowland restoration
areas, even if federal permits are not sought, are should and not granted, or if the property
is acquired by a federal agency.)
Currently, the former Fieldstone property is not included in the LCP boundary. The
Subcommittee made the following recommendation to modify the existing conservation
easement issue to include the Fieldstone property:
A conservation easement should be placed over the former Fieldstone property —
staff concurs with the Subcommittee.
Mesa Top Buffer: the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Plan should include an open space
buffer, on top of the Mesa (along the bluff edge), to protect the bluff and wetlands
restoration area from the areas designated for development. The buffer should be of
sufficient width to accommodate passive recreational uses (such as bicycle and/or
pedestrian trails, benches and vista overlooks) similar to those planned for the Harriett M.
Wieder Regional Park (which runs parallel to the Bolsa Chica Mesa, along the length of
the Huntington Mesa at the southern most edge of the Bolsa Chica area).
The Subcommittee made the following recommendation:
A 100-meter Mesa top buffer, as recommended by the Department of Fish and
Game, should be required to protect the bluff restoration areas from areas
designated for development.
Staff believes the City should support the Coastal Commission staff's recommendation
which would be based on State and Federal Agency recommendations. At this time the
Coastal Commission staff report has not been completed and specific recommendations
for buffer width are not yet known.
New Issues:
In addition to the modifications listed above, the Bolsa Chica Subcommittee also
recommended that the Coastal Commission should more specifically address the issue of
archaeology. The Subcommittee's recommendation is as follows:
PL00-03.doc -5- December 28, 1999 11:36 AM
ACTION
•REQUEST FORO
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL00-03
Archaeology: the LCP should require test excavations to determine the depth and
complexity of the sites and areas that are being written-off on the basis of
inadequate information. The LCP should require the information and artifacts
recovered from the date recovery excavations to be made available to scholars and
Native Americans, and interpreted for the public. The LCP should require the
preservation of at least a portion of the most significant sites so that in the future
Native American descendants can restore and maintain the connection between the
people of today and the past.
Staff believes the LCP has established policies for the Bolsa Chica Planned Community
that will require compliance with all County-adopted archaeological/paleontological
policies. These policies ensure that all reasonable and proper steps are taken to either
preserve archaeological remains in place, or alternatively, that measures are taken to
assure the recovery, identification, and analysis of such resources so that their scientific
and historical values are preserved. An archaeological research design for the Bolsa
Chica shall be completed and submitted along with the first Master Coastal Development
Permit application for land use development (Source: Bolsa Chica LCP, Section 3.4.2 -
Cultural Resources Component, pg. 3-21 and 3-22).
It would be premature to add detailed archaeological conditions at the LCP level. The LCP
currently requires that conditions pertaining to archaeology shall be placed on the project
during the tentative map process.
Other Issues:
Vernal Pools
Hearthside Homes has submitted a biological assessment to the Coastal Commission to
evaluate the possibility of the existence of vernal pools on the Bolsa Chica Mesa. In
conversations with the Coastal Commission staff it is our understanding that vernal pools
are not present on the Mesa. However, there may be seasonal ponds present that should
be preserved.
Storm Drain Outfall Pipes
In April 1998, the City sent a letter to the Army Corps of Engineers (Attachment No. 1)
identifying concerns related to the drainage structures. Concerns included: degradation of
the visual quality of the bluff and bluff face visible from Pacific Coast Highway, disturbance
to the wetlands and wildlife habitat, water quality and velocity associated with discharge
into the wetlands, and water quality impacts for the Huntington Harbour. The letter also
requested that the Army Corps of Engineers handle the application as an Individual
Permit, rather than a Nationwide Permit.
PL00-03.doc -6- December 28, 1999 11:36 AM
0REQUEST FOR ACTION •
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL00-03
The Army Corps of Engineers determined that the application would remain a Nationwide
Permit, and has processed the application accordingly.
Staff and Bolsa Chica Subcommittee Recommendation:
Storm Drain Outfall Pipes: Staff continues to support the concerns addressed in the
letter sent to the Army Corps of Engineers dated April 7, 1998, and recommends the
Coastal Commission evaluate the following issues in the LCP: degradation of the
visual quality of the bluff and bluff face visible from Pacific Coast Highway due to
the placement of the drainage structures and the bluff stabilization work required,
disturbance to wetlands and wildlife habitat from the placement of structures in
wetlands and the water quality and velocity of water to be discharged into the
wetlands, and the potential water quality impacts for the Bolsa Chica Wetlands and
Huntington Harbour.
Environmental Status:
Not applicable. This action is for the purpose of filing a report to the City Council and does
not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Attachment(s):
City Clerk's
Page Number No. Description
1 Letter from the City of Huntington Beach to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers dated April 7, 1998
RCA Author: WN
PL00-03.doc -7- December 28, 1999 11:36 AM
-�� City of Huntington Beach
2000 MAIN STREET� CALI FORNIA 92M' OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
Tele_phone(714)536.5553 :
April 7. 1998
h1r.Richard Schubel, Chief
Regulatory Branch
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers .
9011 Vrdshire Blvd., l lth Floor
Los Angeles,CA 90017
Attention: Eric Stein,Project Manager
Subject: Permit Applicationsfor Development at Bolsa Chica
in the Huntington Beach Area
Dear.Mr:Schubel:
I am writing you at the direction of the Huatington Beach City Council..The City of
Huntington Beach surrounds Bolsa Chica,which is in the CiVs sphere of influence,and
we will soon be discussing with the Koll Real Estate Group,which owns or controls most
of the upland Bolsa Chica area,a possible annexation of their property to the City. It is
important,therefore,that the City and the public be fully apprised of all proposed
projects,their associated permit applications,and the requirements for those permits and
have the ability to comment and provide input on them. Since the area will likely be
annexed eventually,it is quite appropriate that the City be given the opportunity to review
and comment on all permit applications. This is to request your cooperation in advising
our City Administrator of any and all permit applications and intended actions with
respect to activities in the Bolsa Chica area.
' As to the Nationwide 7 Permit sought for the Bolsa Chica drainage structures',the City
has the following concerns:
1. Degradation of the visual quality of the bluff and bluff face visible from Pacific Coast
Highway due to the large structures themselves and the bluff stabilization work
required.
rinjo,Japan -5I5--TER CITIELS Zea
2. Disturbance to wetlands and wildlife habitat from the placement of structures in
wetlands and the water quality and velocity of water to be discharged into the
wetlands.
3. Potential water quality impacts for the Bolsa Chica Wetlands.and Huntington Harbour-
(we recognize that redirecting runoff to other discharge points is likely to result iu the
waters ultimately entering into the Wetlands and Huntington Harbour anyway).
We request that this application be handled as an Individual Permit,rather than a
Nationwide Permit and not be acted upon until after certification of the Bolsa Chica Local
Coastal Program by the State Coastal Commission,and issuance of the Permit by the
State Regional Water Control Board. We believe that processing the application for a
Nationwide Permit would be contrary to the public interest We have also been advised
that the Corp could reassert jurisdiction(as you did in 1994)to again extend to all of the
Bolsa Chica Mesa,given the drainage structure impacts on the wetlands and waters of the
United States. We would appreciate hearing from you on this question.
We appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
Very truly yours,
Shirley Dettloff,Mayor
City of Huntington Beach
cc: Ray Silver,City Administrator
Melanie Fallon,Community Development Director
Daryl Smith,Acting Public Works Director
Lucy Dunn, Senior Vice President,Koll Real Estate Group
Thomas Mathews,Director of Planning&Development Services, County of Orange
John Sibley,Director of Public Facilities&Resources, County of Orange
(G:2dma1trr79SMSM
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To: Connie Brockway, City Clerk
From: Howard Zelefsky, Director of Planning UT`,
Date: January 3, 2000
Subject: Late Communications for January 3, 2000 City Council Meeting
Included with this memorandum is a transmittal to the City Council as a Late
Communication for the January 3, 2000 City Council meeting.
Attachment:
PowerPoint Presentation to accompany Agenda Item F-1.
� rrt
r*
`i �
BOLSA CHICA COASTAL
ISSUES
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
JANUARY 3,2000
BACKGROUND
is August 1995-City Council approved seven coastal related issues
that were of concern to the City to transmit to the California Coastal
Commission
• June 1996-Bolsa Chico Local Coastal Program Certified
■ April 1999-Court of Appeal orders trial court to remand Bolsa Chico
LCP back to the Coastal Commission for consideration
■ February 2000-Bolsa Chico LCP tentatively scheduled to return to
the Coastal Commission for their consideration
z
SEVEN ORIGINAL COASTAL ISSUES
In August 190,the City Council approved seven Bolsa
Chica Coastal Issues that were submitted to the Coastal
Commission for consideration. The issues submitted
Included recommendations regarding:
■ Conservation Easement
■ Mesa Top Buffer
■ Wetland Restoration Plan
■ Mesa Top Roadway
■ Cultural/Historical Memodallzation
■ Compatibility with Los Patos Development
■ Product Type 3
1
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Bolsa Chica Subcommittee
Summary
The Boise Chica Subcommittee recommends approval
of the original seven Bolsa Chica Coastal Issues
submitted to the Coastal Commission with modifications
to recommendations addressing:
■ Conservation easement over former Fieldstone property
■ Mesa top buffer-100 meters
■ Archaeology
ADDITIONAL ISSUES
Bolsa Chica Subcommittee
The Bolsa Chica Subcommittee requested follow-
up on two additional issues:
■ Storm drain outfall pipes
■ Vernal pools
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Staff Recommendation
Summary
Staff supports approval of the original seven Bolsa
Chica Coastal Issues submitted to the Coastal
Commission with alternative recommendations for the
following issues:
■ Width of the Mesa Top Buffer
■ Archaeology
6
2
3 civ
Housing on the Bolsa Chica Mesa has been designed to avoid the area of potential
surface rupture by providing a 50-foot setback. No habitable structures will be placed
within this setback. Additionally, the project proposes the development of a Community
Park (Source: County LCP Land Use Plan, Exhibit F) along the major fault line that will
prevent any building structures from being constructed in an unsafe proximity to the
fault. Any development within the Bolsa Chica project area will be in full compliance with
all Local and State seismic standards and requirements as set forth in the EIR Mitigation
Program and LCP conditions of approval.
CITY GOALS APPROVED 2/22/99
102. Fire: The Fire Department has indicated that annexing the Bolsa Chica will have an
impact on the Department's ability to assume and provide fire protection services
throughout the City. Annexing the Bolsa Chica area will consume system-wide facility
resources. Goals to achieve (relating to fire issues) include funding for necessary capital
.improvements, meeting required response time standards' for fire or medical
emergencies and obtaining acceptable access to the Bolsa Chica Planned Community.
The Bolsa Chica Annexation Study found that the City's on-going costs for police and fire
service to the proposed Mesa development would be provided for by the property taxes
and other revenue generated by the development. Included in this finding is transfer of
the Orange County Fire Authority's property tax levy to the City. In addition to these on-
going revenues, staffs negotiations with Hearthside Homes have yielded substantial
public safety related exactions, including a $75,000 payment for police services and$2.5
million to provide for fire improvements related to the development.
103. Public Works: any pre-annexation agreement would include provisions to address
streets, water and wastewater issues.
Staff and Hearthside Homes have negotiated conceptual terms of a pre-annexation
agreement that requires Hearthside Homes to provide, among other exactions, the City
with a 9-million gallon water reservoir and a sewer lift station that will replace an aging
City facility and accommodate the development's sewer needs.
104. Water: production, distribution and storage of water should all be part of the pre-
annexation negotiations. The City's goal is to ensure that adequate supplies of water
are available under all conditions, including provision of storage in case of a temporary
cessation of deliveries, and in meeting fire flow pressure and volume.
Through discussions with Hearthside Homes and City staff, both parties have proposed
that, as a term of any pre-annexation agreement, the City shall provide all municipal
services to the Mesa development project, including, but not limited to: water, police, and
fire services.
The terms have also proposed that Hearthside Homes will provide the City with
improvement security (bond or other acceptable instrument of credit) to pay for a 9-
million gallon water reservoir, booster station and appurtenances (the "water
improvements'). Hearthside Homes will complete construction of the water
improvements (to City standards) before occupancy of the 351s' unit in the Mesa
tE development project. Hearthside Homes will also dedicate approximately 1.5 acres of
t
06/25/99 30
j
i1 t
l
land to the City for the water reservoir(at a site mutually agreeable to Hearthside Homes
and the City).
If the Bolsa Chica were annexed into the City, the City would have a statutory obligation
to provide water service to the area. If the annexation occurs, the 9 million-gallon water
reservoir will help to complete Water Master Plan improvements.
105. Wastewater: negotiations must address the means by which wastewater will be collected
and pumped and how related facilities will be financed. The City should create the most
efficient design to accommodate both the current wastewater service needs and the
needs of future development.
It was proposed that, as a term of any pre-annexation agreement, Hearthside Homes will
provide the City with a sewer lift station (the "sewer improvements'). Hearthside Homes
will complete construction of the sewer improvements to City standards prior to
occupancy of the first unit in the Mesa development project.
106. Streets: the project must accommodate efficient traffic circulation, address traffic safety
standards, and adequately meet parking demands.
The local road system for the Bolsa Chica Mesa will be served by the Mesa Connector
which will be a collector roadway, connecting Warner Avenue with Bolsa Chica Street. It
will be constructed as a 2-lane, divided road, with landscaped parkways and a median
between the two project entries (Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). Class 11
bicycle lanes will be provided within the roadway. Adjacent to the Mesa Community
Park, notched public parking and landscape pockets will be provided on both sides of
the roadway.
107. Community Services: it is anticipated that the increase in population will further burden
current over-utilized recreation facilities in proximity to the Bolsa Chica area. The
Community Services Department has projected the need to provide additional sports
field improvements at two adjacent elementary schools. The impacts on facilities will
occur whether or not the Bolsa Chica is annexed into the City; however, a pre-
annexation agreement may provide the opportunity for the City to negotiate park design
standards and adequate funding to address service/maintenance costs.
Community Services has determined that the proposed concept plan for the Mesa
Community Park is acceptable if the project can provide for three lighted fields to
maximize the availability of the fields to serve the youth sports participants that the
project will generate.
Through discussions with Hearthside Homes and City staff, both parties have proposed
that, as a term of any pre-annexation agreement, that Hearthside Homes will construct a
recreational playing field (soccer) with "practice level"lighting on the park planned to be
adjacent to the new school playing fields. As part of an anticipated land exchange
agreement, staff expects the Ocean View School District and Hearthside Homes will
cooperate in lighting the two proposed school playing fields.
108. Police: if annexed, the City's Police Department will provide all law enforcement related
services to the Bolsa Chica area. Goals relating to police issues include maintaining
06/25/99 31 i
RCA ROUTING SHEET
INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Planning
SUBJECT: Bolsa Chica Coastal Issues
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 3, 2000
RSA ATTAR H M E N7S STATUS
Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable
Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable)
(Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable
Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc.
(Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable
Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable
Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable
Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable
Staff Report (If applicable) Not Applicable
Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable
Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable
EXPLANATIONFOR MISS1G ATTACHMENTS
. ..
FORWARDED
Administrative Staff
Assistant City Administrator Initial
City Administrator Initial
[City Clerk
EXPLANATION FO R RETU RN OF ITEM:
Space . Only)
RCA Author: HZ:SH:wn:kjl
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
HUNTINOTON BEACH
CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Shirley Dettloff, City Council Member SP
DATE: August 5, 1999
SUBJECT: `H"Item for the August 16, 1999, City Council Meeting
City Review of Bolsa Chica Issues before the Coastal
Commission
In anticipation of the up-coming Coastal Commission meeting regarding the Bolsa Chica,
I would like staff to analyze the proposed development relative to coastal issues and
report back to the Bolsa Chica Sub-Committee with a recommendation.
SD:lp
xc: Connie Brockway
Ray Silver
Melanie Fallon
T
/ �j