Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Coastal Element Addition to General Plan 1980-82 - Local Coa
i s OFA or OrA or dip a 10 li 9 Y" E' .t t� i71 } i Y+ "lolr ` wRsp,,t, ! 1 $ Mri MIV, ® : y gg, w �,.. ro �M:j..A 7, i1 � i a'"�,'��. �}w A '����,.f tw ��-�� �<��• s��, :ex',' �t r� .,.„r r���, ,� ,,,:�; ,,.�.: r+ ,�. . .v . ,.y, •,„i hi"` .,6,TTT� �+tr�µn r� !�i,. �t��, .fix, y�i� 4 g:i..K.. +!J t,��•.Y � ,r 1�$ �:�'r. +s 'i"'� iYY �qr�ex , r.. r '�, -� A �."�1 yyr ,� , !�e "'fiey,' � .A"�t },�T��'; � 4 'G �,$' �e+�" t Tir�A,% at �1!,�r"5, �1 ,`�� ��.,• y w •l; r�I�'F"t �W p �., .y�,,y} Y�t; i LjCITV OF. HUrITINGTON BEACHINTER-DEPARiM Wr COMh1UN1rATlON� : ` Ta . count I.lman Don MucA ll Cuter From r;) 11 Hutton �� � . •� city Attorney 5ulljl'ct rcncral P1'(ri Cnrtrttrtl 'CLewitt Date jallllary 19, 1�)pl pr:1Ct -• Sug.gested Revision., 'At. y6tiv reyut:nt herewith are my conlrncnts OI1 the I)1'aft Co. J 'Iem 16.1 -- Preservation or the Pacific —";rctI%1e }light: of {Itctr•r. 't:t dove. lopmerlt (tit both slides of the wirrow •t t•111 wh I eb ' !II• r{rht-"r-ws1� Ct•arn Gari'told St;i-vot soilth to ':1:11' :;L1'reL. 'rll(- ':;•, Iv + It(•11 Lr •tvrrac•a thy' )IIIrILtnrtolr tiestrh (*ornpanv r:)nrh {�r•nticrt�• !t'• •• '.�1 i ` t11' Lill t•;1n(.h hruae and cute t.hl otiph the hi l . it) a .a:1sc Yor kt o';!1: 1l.>• . !ieve In develu{Iment on two=1 tlir•ds or the st r•in Ills each stills. . s , •'t Lit i'VII. �a iL In (!? ffirnit to :Ire how thin lunrl'nw st•rtl' r.uivld be ra t•r•t•t: 1'• 'I•t ilov. '.•:lrf'n It was lrnab le It. c:ntita i ned :I !ni�li, trarlc !'�'• ' 1 ?1• ' :a' o t•S p wou to have to tee istivei a sect nt Csti t• nl:l rkvt value' ! . I 1. i: ration corridor. The cl LY•rllt ! � t':'11I1134 1'CRu 1' 11-Lion uy Us.. owners. I.: -Ine"lent' tlhnc {:sells of tl.:slispor 1 Itlurl rl:!•1.1 11+1• :1 nal-I.1 :. • 110 • woul s uttlkt!. _ Z Iyyt•'- fol' Ills' ll1';11'1,1 'al -1 lt't':il .,t -irldlin'ty ho 1,111•tic IIi r111r1 that the ci t.; 1!1111 It-ri tltrrll e l -I :into iri I.ot1.i r, t . • s• :In./ kIlist nl' evenlli:11 tLy. Thusr it Call pI •i1•, Lht• cir•nn 1.;• •i s •: :it ).111 1'•.tl•1.1•tol. 'fill Lilt' 1111111 an n polivy, ill !i1r'1• . Its'•+.te('t•1("1 t'" • t.i11.11L rtl:k. {tOii!"!t.'t' � ahl'll 1 t )'('1'ii.t'iCt.;i r1,..i1•.1 +i.tryN1l1 i1�•(•.1.1 •i. ,. �:• • I!it) t , '1't! cl:'IBelt is c tvii; point. a (I,it.y C I th, ' 1' �":ttti(•tllrt i !r• 1 1'. # 111 1 :1ks+t1 /1r to t,i1/: ,'rr::t I•It.I.Ioil. 'I'h.. 1•.3l'rrn1. Id sl • , ! 111:11. i•i:e C'11 1 11" t'11 :;r/ltr't.'l i,• Voil1'1• h'1:: 1 I•.+1 i t••1 til' f'•`1'+'' ' r t . .. 1 •'1 l t11�:1(.�1' 1./1 I;t••.t.11• :I wl•I t 't'l►t• lilitt.i' t 1 .i r :e ri11ri1.1't:,• T••'lll'1 11 1•r . •.1 11••1 till 1'0 1 -o I t, ' :S L !:.,v. ':'lllt;: t List t+It'.'' i1,lt 1: l+t•e•l1 I t 'it't1 } 1 ) r' t•i {st 111 1.11' , t ,•1 11111! 111 1t•llt ol• ttii•1' ,•r• . "1 ,..1, � 1 T 1'I' 'trt.l• . i;: /il ;:rr 1i1.• 1"llh� l t' ;1 vat.1'111 i till 11!1llt'u:) 1.1`::r.11vi. Ifill I'll !tt';)Iri•t•t �• 1 t 111. ' ill• ' Ir•V i i , ;:(`r hT:: I,11 1'1' • {)t( i I.. 1• i I :1 •1•T:rl+l .•ir• 11:. 1 Vr• 1 +•Il •'1' t S II',1' S li r t } ,! 1rl:I t'il .••� 1' jl,I 't1 :tl.(�1 I1• +1 ti+11. .7t•r t't :)t nI.`it ni'rlIIVIIti:'' t 111• i•• i1;:t.:11 i!'1!;1 : ouch, (I tl1J lIIIrll!('1?1.1:':1114 tom'"''• , y� l 1 .r YII �; d .6 i�. S Milt.•. io- ,aq �. Cr)Urr f L.inN DON ra�rr:r►�►,ls!lat, n.►:�1. , ls. 1.Y CITY Y 111 t t)titaf;Y cant 1, t!U t 1 r:t,f jj „�•.,;es;ted modifications to Ursrfi._Lucal Coast:a1 I'l'eri Page 47 - At Wetlands , delete pitr: l raphs 1 LO 4 :Ir►,1 ',ns er•t : "The area east of Beach and south of Newlrend has bean descr.iboo by several agencles, as a potentially nensit:ive envirunment. No formal actions have been taken by these r;roups . The city Will develop a specific plan for this; area . When the property develops, portions of the area may be restored, provided that it In economically feasible to do so. The land use designat. ion shall be Visitor Serving Commercial ." � , 1 txC.4i -, PE-P V--T SO-v '77 KOd -irT t� iq�. r Page 47 - AL Multi-story Development In Uowriwlt"Are , a�r�ci .a rek• ?)aIla_ raph :t "If lot consolidation is encouraged Yrith the bonus of h1r;her•. structures each plan vrlll be reviewed to allow for adequate open s since and set backs . " f" Psaf;e Jil - tlrrrner Avenue to the }runtins;ton Ueach Mesa Bluffs (Strikea`il . 'rereretrce to Bolsa Chicsa on Pages III and 42 as directed. ) ere �I•j - se(:tion 4.2. 2, Usual Resoctr•ces nrcan, Coastal b uff A.ven de to para.;rnph 6 in its entirety. a nt;e 153 Wiles 13 and 14 , exclusion from exet•ptlon of P.E. right--of'-- wir,, Question to poste to 1•11%. Palirl r "Why Is the Pacific Electric right-of-way excluded from they i1Ccr.2►� requireme:ntsa at lair►es 13 anti 14 , 1►:rr.E. 1�i3? It 1rr,cr.rs f to ,itigle out a vaisticuiar, plee;e of property diff'c•renc trcatrncnL. Delitc• Lime, 13 .arid 14 rartle� the taff' mid plf►ruriu►, commission have a, .. � . I � •^N • r + 7 I F ratIonal basin for treating one prc,perty di ffe vetltly from any other. IJ-Gel. COMMENT. -It in cons t.t.tutionally sisipi-et 1t► ell:;c:r•lminaLe aoonr pf'olivilty owner: or exclude a 11:111Llc•ulal, p1voe fit' Illso or•ty from rrl•l ether property, ahse4nt a r'at' lonalt! of t.hl; 1.1,;; , C"lls' l - tut:ion, T:qu.al 1'voLescttc,rr Cl::i►:�!) Sal. ► 155 - 6f - Delete al l c.,f 6r tinA 1nr,c•� '. . d "ULiltre vx1n0nr, :ity nirn 01-dinnm.f• r•eiculatic,na fc,r the 1 'oastal xott(.- t-)r on-pr•emlic .,IIrtI,-, _ �i �r�a.�w�' ��i1':v.�'. x�-'_ . 'Ic�`si�'x��.SaF. `e ��ra•��'rim'"k"i;Facts�'+!1'�!`:lE9S-awt;'R!1+;�:Ya:Y#er^stta+rw,�y:r . I . • ifir me) i,ta (;ritr:wi.11tl.7tl M-Ic•A1J lot-or t: :' Ie'•' Re: r;erlr,rrll Platt :.LaI C1(.1110 nt, I)l•;Ii't: lrll'1'�': .r-nlu;lr�• ttt , ) ''"1 Item 11.2.2 •- Coastal Hurl' Areas The. yet bark recluiverm.•nt:l appear to be e.xeer,,lvs? rnnsidertnf- Vbr- tct vain. 9'he. lowlands; are wide and to comply w!t:ll thr? c',�tluirt:nlecit talat: HIM* f1' rlovelopmellL be Net bacic I'r11- anouc;h so they Cannot lie Seen Mould tie' an . Illllruual requirement , oil(' which Is both ar'l)lt.teary niid capriclou:; . I tern G 1.1 -- Wetland The dcrf;it;nrttlr,n of' the avea bel.ween Beach Boulevard and NtwVind :Stasee t neros.s frowthe former city anirnal shalter atld :;ut•rotiticling tho cult' Oil Company 3tovige tanks :1, a hird sanctuary (rub -stern (2) ) and the desir— trrtt:irm ref that arca . on I'll;urc 6. 2 as "fresh/brackish venter• mar:.tl", wolrld be cllfricilt to support fact:u,llly. FllYurc fi. 2 Is tnJs]eI lie. Tl�r v(!rbaltc. un pare , G7 which describes the areas read, like a brochure' rlc:surihitr[; A nature tral.l. The city rropert;,y nn 11pach and FCl1 (ad.i,�r.ernt: �aa the Driftwood Mobile Home Park and livittitil-ton Beach 11111) Jr, 0•rr.1glintied rov, comme.-reinI use. In actuality the two artsrl:. are Indistinguishable. A weUtthAs designation removes all economie. use 1'rorn the propertly. 'PMn type of planked urge it exre.rnr,ive, . rbit:miry and vaprirtuu:l and gAvcs 111 e to inval'se condemns oil, b l i frilt i n,r: and 11,1113a ;i nl; 01' p r'apert.y . I f t01!t cJ I,Y Lrclly want, to doti frmat.e the propert:;r as wetlands It Ill: irrta to ly will pay i'a.ic' market: value fov it, I ' I , ' h t,t:ucb#!d fire proposed amc•ndmr:nt:; to tile Coils t -11 Nall whisk 1-01,1 i cs L t,llt• abuvo comments . . rs;I1. IIr►'rTciN . f;tt,y ALLorney A;.tat0iment, ' rr:; li,:n Arl;,rel .ln, Acting Clty Admini,t:raLov •� J:,rnrr N11.111, hevelopalt,nt Services Ul.r,rr•' t• Members of the City Crlunl�11 4 I- , } i , !s .._.... . '":���a^�.�4� �:��t• w'�?�"�,'.��..`i�'.�- ��xi�9�ss."7hi�1�' -xt ..�i. ��Ye�i�,;a�„.��� '�.Y :��.�,"ci:-: _ ,i '�. CITY OF H UNTI NGTINGTON BEACH �,,,srcoAwcr CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION i TO Alicia WeptVpfi,-h, City. Clerk FROM Councilman Jack Kelly r euXACT Ara'an ment to''LCP Regarding DATE Jai-vary 200 1981 Bolan Chica. city RtO. nt•l�Qjc, Ittfilusioq in LC9 - concerning the Aolsa dhica Though . the Prea,hnown as the Bol.sa Chica is not located in the jurisdiction ot�yth#'!C1t7 of Huntington=Beach, at this time, the + City con 0idtire }*"jtV*j,ativa to contribute moaningful influence on the resolva•of the ar*a'a future uses. 1. The City urges *11 8p' opriate state and Fe'deral agercies to accelerate aborts to positivdly define only specific acreage in the aojxa ,C�ics which: in .fact can be acisnt:ifically justified ! as o.�yi�zotatAe�nk4?ly sensitive habitat. xn' addition, the City , iequeste AvAl urgae those agetioi;es to provide precise recommends- /' tiona as to the economic feasibility of rehabilitation of such deuignated sensitive areas. .1 �.. , when those.Statqand ftAeral responsibilities are properly presented'"a'd• aers4pt'd4:, the city will totally support the pro-nervation of such designated environmentally sensitive habitat areao. ' f t 2. Residual, acreage in the Bolea Chica which is not included in ! state and Federal designation of environmentally sensitive i habitat arona will be supported by the City for full development of compatible land uses. Further, it is the city's intentions 1 that such uses will not be burdened with unrealistic or excessive set backs And other restrictive ordinances and codes intended to arbitrarily force sanctions against compatible land use +� development. I . It in further intended by the City to instruct and direct stuff ; to organize and structure a format by which the City can open, ua soon as possible, negotiations and discussions with the property owner of record of the subject nolsa Chica land and the County of Orange for the purpose of achieving annoxnt.i can ' of the noloa Chica into the City of Huntington Beach. � xd r� pz ka 1 x �otoh'�ank x�r �io 5 i t (6 Stories) acres) FFIGH' •;Z;XbFEDIUM _ s DE2tiSITY DENSITY +y -- --- 1 -- -- — --- — I=- —_: RESMENTIAL _ �,� , t' RESIDENMIAL -- --- . - -- -- — -- ---- --, —; (5 acres) _ �� (3 Stories) i res) NOW 77 _ 1 - E RC.St O�firAL ViS1-13R- :''xnIt:X VISITOR- MEDItr'. VISITOR- OFFICE/RESIDE2tTIAI."• CVM-:-:ERCIAL/ DENSITY SERVING DENSITY SERVItIC SUPPORT t+� acres, RESIDE:77-aA.. (9 acres) RESIDEMIAL COMMERCIAL RECREATION with hick with high hotels/Motels Oz:icc Buildings (57 acres) density density Restaurants Condooini=s or=ica ar. ortinn on Shops Apartmenus Canso!-dated consolidated Entertain-ment parcels parcels Ancillary Co=ercial Offices and Service Uses (3 Stories) (above the . (3 Storipa) first floor) Hotels/:Motels (24 acres) (13 aeras) Restaurants (6 Stories) Shops Or acZrss) Entertainment (6 Stories) {_5 acres) A. .C;' M' ! : LiC CITY OF �-I�JR'�J�°11��►` ON BEACH ` ' P.O. nbx 190 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CALIFORNIA 92848 BUILDING DIVIMON 0141)5306241 PLANNING DIVISION(714)53aWl TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members Attention: Frank B. Arguello, Acting City Administrator. FROM: James W. Palin, Director of Development Services DATE: December 31, 19BO SUBJECT: COASTAL ELF11ENT Attached for your consideration at the January,,, 51. 1980, meeting are the Coastal Element Land Use Map, text, and policy revisions incorp- orating Council direction as adopted by straw votes on December 15, 1980. Also attached is a resolution for Council adoption of the ' Coastal Element. The text and policy package reflect revisions recommended by both t the Planning Commission and City Council. Where language has been deleted, words and sentences remain in the `text 'but have been lined out. Added language is underlined and set off by. asterisks. Changes ..,` directed by Council alone are highl.ighte6 in yellow. S in revising the Coastal Element, staff encountered a number of items for which further clarification is requested. It is .requested that, these,-,..- items, listed below, be discussed at the January 5 regular meeting. ` ITDIS NEEDING CLARIFICATION 1) Height Limits between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard -- It is staff's understanding that the following height limits have been established: Goldenwest Street to Sixth Street - Three stories on both residential and commercial uses. Sixth Street to Lake Street Six stories on all land rises within the coastal zone. Lake Street to Beach Boulevard - Three stories on all land used with the exception of the commercial/support recreation area, which has no established height limit. Council is requested to either concur with t;,e above or establish . alternative height limits For these areas. i t .p.,i.r Coastal Element Page 2 2) Residential Density between Goldenwest and Sixth ,Streets it; is staffs understanding that Council directed a medium density designation, be `placed on 12 blocks in this area, but that development could elcceed 15 units per acre if consol'idat� ' in took place. Any zoning or specific plan that allows development above the medium density maximum of 15 units per acre, however, would be inconsistent with the City's General Pljjn and in violation of State planning law. in order to, accomplish Council's objective of encouraging lot consolidation via density incentives, twc alternative approaches for adoQting a General Plan land use designation and subsequent zoning or specific plan ordinances are presented for your consideration. a) Designate tha area high density residential in the Coastal_; Element, with additional policy direction that the implementing zoning or specific plan use variable lot area ratios to reflect base density of 15 units per acre on smaller lots and/or . parcels, and up to 35 units per, acre on fully consolidated blocks or major portions thereof, or whatever maximum density determined to be desirable in this area. A policy setting forth the Council's intent should be added to the Coastal Element if this approach is taken. b) Create a new General Plan land use designation for the area, called medium-high residential and designated as a striped pattern. This would allow subsequent zoning or specific plan ordinances to reflect any range of densities, provided again that some maximum is established. Staff recommends the first approach for several reasons. First, j the high density designation does not preclude limiting the density of development on smaller lots or parcels, as zoning And development below the maximum density is consistent with the General Plan and is allowed under the Government Code. A policy addressing the Council's intent would insure density limits were followed. A medium density designation would not allow any new development in excess of 15 units per arse, regardless of lot size or incentives. Creating a new land use designation within the General Plan is not necessary, as the: Council 's intent for the Goldenwest to Sixth Street area can be not using existing land use designations and zoning techniques. The relatively small area proposed for the new designation (37 acres) may not warrant such special consider- ation, t yr.:mwi.irtnncfr.!S�1k:�• f:�g`� t�a.. '�`q"#c-7���.�'��.:iai"" ,�'.t+�+�+.,3''"�,.��'�S�n����it7t.�I �'4t�'�`'��$"..a^'lF.'�'�"�'�7��,.,�,.��,�1�. _ _ Coastal Element Page 3 The concerns abauii lot: size ihd consolidation can be appropriately : addressed. as zoning or specific !an issues, as long as the General. Plan. provided flexibility, :so that- increased densities .can. be. allowed as, an incentive for consolidation. For this reason, the high , density land use designation is recommended for this area,. along with ` additional Council direction for preparing subsequent zoning or specific plan ordinances, such as is mentioned above in (a) ,' 3. Status of Pacific Coast Highway - At the December 15, .1980 .meeting, Council revised policies that would have }prohibited the .oroposed widening of Pacific Coast Highway betweer. Beach Boulevard; and? the Santa,Ana River. The Departments car Public Works and 'Development . ,. r:.. Services recommend that Pacific Coast Highway be redesignated from a primary to a major. arterial highway for its. entire length through the City. If C^*,tncil concurs with this recommendation, the Circtilat- tio'n Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways (Fig. 9.4) can be amended to reflect this change. A memo from the Department of Public Works on this matter is attached. Staff anticipates Council ,adoption of O1e Coastal El.ement with the attached revisions on January 5, 1981. The ret iution of adoption may also be amended to include any further revisions or clarifications Council may desire as a result of discussions conducted during the January 5 re`gular meeting Attachments: 1. 'Land Use Map for area .from Goldenwest Street to Teach Boulevard, reflecting Council recommendations of December 15, 1980. 2. Coastal Element Text revisions 3. Coastal Element policy package, reflecting Council, recommendations of December 15, 1980 4. Resolution 5. Memo regarding Pacific Coast Highway upgrading Respectfully submitted, ames W. Palin, Director Development Services 7WP/BH/dc I . I I • I GENERAL ti, �) i•' ` CO."MRCIAL '-•,l� -_ -- -- •�, ..,.• (5 Stories) •'� �� t , acres} J V* � ' :} ziti�lt`r i�':�i: its ;� �•�.� f:� �J'\ ° __; `! c :_�;_�.! L� tfIGH ,MEDIUM DF:NISITY `� �✓ DE14SITY � l RES IDEt3TZAL RCSIDENTIAL � S act es) `i3 Stories) :�. ::.! F' 1 u S __j��tL- 1un !1 L _j. LJ �189 -t--, �--t r- �--1 r-; --� acres) IV I I L A VISITOR- MEDIUM VISITOR- MEDIUM VISITOR-- OFFICE/FESIDEM..IAL CGHMERCIAL/ SLR%1T"G D=;SITY SERVING DENSIV-_ SERVING SUPPORT (6 acres) RESIDE:'TIAL (9 acres) RESIDF=IAL COMMCRCIAL RECREATION ::ith high with high Hotels/Potels office Buildings .(57 acres) density density Restaurants Condominiums option on ortion on Shops Apartments consolidated consolidated Entertainment parcels parcels Ancillary Commercial" offices and Service Uses (above the (3 Stories) (3 Storiew first floor) Hotels/Motels t24 acres) (13 acres) Pestaurants (b Stories) Shops a (9`. acres) Entertainment E (6 Stories) (35 acres) I. r ATTACHMENT 2 a.f �i I i i I I I I I I � f The Coastal Act allows local govnrnments to prepare their Lt.P's in throe phases: Phase I issue identification and preparation of a work program. Phase If Preparation of a land use plan. Phase Iii Development of zoning ordinances and other devices ti necessary to implement the plan. .� This document.presents the land use plan in the form of a Coastal Element and represents the completion of Phase 11 of the i-funtington Beach LCP. 1.3 HUNTINGTON BEACH COASTAL ELEMENT in order to. meet Coastal Act requirements, the City's Coastal Element includes infotmation sufficiently detailed to indicate the kinds, location :vid intensity of land uses and applicable resource protection rind devel.upment policle►-. The Coastal ;'foment designates different categories of land uses which will be permitted within tivi coastal zone and npecifles the areas where each land u30 }' is appropriate. Three - pie rlttp f--ffl--t'eep�cras-� Of JAWF]0418a Ppme �4--W}-AgaNaNe- ee 4Y-11 .mot 41W, M-no.I.A ir1--ar-on. Mew= /ew-E� +tows .-a` i#ee+stes-eerec -a�- '. The land use mop, categories rind add',tionai pniicies together constitute the Coastal Element, which is intended to reflect local conditions and needs while meriting the . Coastal Act policies and requirements. 1.31 Coastal Pianning Efforts This Cnnstal Element culminates n two-year effort by the City of Huntington • Bench Department of Development Services. in July, 1977, City staff began Phase 1 of the I-CP by identifying those farts of the Coastal Act most relevant to the resources in the Huntington Aeach coastal zone. A detailed work program war, developed, outlining the background studies and other steps necessary for preparing the Coastal Element. The Coastal Commission approved the work program with some modifications, and provided funds for Phase it, which began in Janucry, 1970. The staff conducted detailed studies of eight subject areas especially relevant to the City's cn;tstal resources: shoreline nccess; recreational boating; visual resources; water and marine resources; diking, rlradtlinq, filling and shnreline ` structures, environmentally sensitive+ t'nbitals; energy facilities, rind housing. The findings and recommnndatiotts of these studies are reported in a series of background reports, available through the Oepnrtmer+t of novelopment j Services. t G ,ants .I... .•.. :< :.,rc=, -r l Each of these sections begins with n ba;:kgronnd subsection.which inventories file coastal 'resources found in tile. Huntington Beach Caostal ..Zone and discusses the importance of these resources to the 'local 'community, the Stale and be nation. An analysis subsection then Identifies the issues related to the protection and enhancement; of coastal resources in Huntington ©etch and presents the City's approach toward resolving. these Imues. Each section ends with a conclusion that summarizes objectives the Coastal Element intends to accomplish through its map and policies. Following discussion of these coastal issues, Section `10 presents the`land use designolions, e* map of the wee-e�aats{ *elterrH3H++ *lanilrtuse `prank r�r�d additional .resource protection and de.volopmcrit "policies which form the basis for Implementation of the plan. Thn final section of the Coastal Element discusses the process for approving and implementing the element. R '•i 1 1 9. t i t ,a V u 1 1 . t , 1 " i Y , " { • ! 1 . +Aa+ - ' +��� 1`� a� � 'i^ L..t. ' I-t?,i� ��r�"„t.'�T ,:ar 's r i k. n a ry c . � ;5 ,•4 ?u Y"✓, � r s }'�:�.-.a'-1� `t 1�1.'.F. � � -7,t I S. ,{:.� 'r Y'�"; � -i "�". 4-i. � �' -i r n,�'�. t•�/ �! Si,�ti, X`''�'t"!1 1(( f7J" 'i h 7' .ti. �ti4, t ; y .� r'; , r r-. fr ".•.�r j � iyt ,I :{ Y � I..t rr'{".#.9r � `�.� ,�� � r� • { y " ti �� ,� •) �.f x�„}l�� + � yr�,�i}�Y}i�i p,•r�` °y�''�}� � �' �.Ai,tX f,.fir #�` �t.�o. �}" z,�F,i� i /r' ,,���+ ��'"•y" ' �1'. t �1i ,}, �t, �''* 'ls'" N�;, i,'f ;4 - :A: ����. " L ;t�'� F'..t,;�'�k�l�'�yF,•.I i�� u I •r.'1y l+G,r`I� 'lr:t >1t ,1^'f,` A u. �.. 1( �i 1'hr'; %� 1 �.�`. •..�� '� ! , i• a �� -'~ A'lti� Y/:I'V,� �,1 -�,��� �:' ! `�fwl ' ."fIP� I�:�i}� �� c '+�� �I���.yrs:A�4�'+y ri .9 j�h a{.l�{ } { ..� � ,�•: . t_+ 4t1.; �I Y, T '•�,J j,�` i`yy1��Rj �,�•�`�T+ �' T} /l�.. 1 t i r �• � '� t F',r ''1" ."Jttr� { � r 1 ,, � '�r fC •.1 w }.4.. j illy �f{r ( .�1: it.63,i41, j.:•a je:''� +: i }r 1 I..y + ��� }+fla ,+ ,, 1 '. ��;4xk r +41: gr'fillx}rF{ !{'��rr}�fY,';j��C.N?N�'.' •�r�.�{' �yJi �}'�1��i� •.,1.+.. � � .f��;'i � Y 'Ll,� , 5 .� •/. ,�Y d,+`�t" iy�,l},`'''+` Si1;i}��I � .tr.� �4j}.:j+T ' ,$�i� lf�rh'Ir:�' '�?^4•i�Kk�t' 4��' `S{_tt�` �. 'A, f 'KI>• .5.#� 1 r'.=hr �+ 4 i � '� " 1;.� k�R` +5 >f'r } t1 ,�L 'y ♦Y,`;:� ;��� tfi rGk•a t�,c f>~l� `'.n ti 1" , 'J 1� 31 ts mOr .y���, �. i,� + , •+{'�4ai�..� �,� � .ArAti��.f��..i fl h �,R`la/��.,��t�:�''• i' � ���"'w �!'� t � S 1i+�.a��,'��tt'✓, -� 9��f•. 0 ^f ` . :� j� 5��.. t:.+ 1ny -}.�ti ,i4 1� .��1,� �r i',':) 'ttf �y��l!'{ � S'� teYwj. �Yt ��•,'Apt'{` Jl►'�ly } 1` t �jA?,k��?•����yf'�t�4�.�.,t`'!h'�.�S\���r.�,y�+��s�,�t���{�'#F��;���i� j�t. ��� � �f �:�y•3' ,j$�r► a+z�,��� 1�',�J � �,�ta�~�>�?T� �Mfi'U •,��`` { , n t a'� .4. 3 '?.'� �. �+ ;. � sY1 l'. r. j � j�f j uj r r�.• 4f' w m 1 E .y f , ``• € C6 yil1AM1M.•"M.Y.e�a r.sF✓tHYh•.-.,�.Y14r1.i4,.ww.hr e`.:.I�a•! � •.• •� ' ., rh �-^ - - •si;j-.�.. ,,. .... ,�,:.. .,„ a.,r .. .a...:.i�.C.��t�....ee. .�;^-':-.•C:. nlll.b..... ...]'.•s.a:.:.+.rrvl+r•w . i The _ second largest concentration of visitor-serving facilities is . In the Huntington Harbour area, which contains a market, drug store, clothing stores, professional services, laundries, boat nervices, banks/savings and loans, and a small number of specialty shops and other uses. 3.2 A14ALYSiS Existing overnight visitor accommodations,need to be expsinded to support the large numbers of visitors ,to the: City's coast. Opportunities for overnight accommodations are limited. Vacancy rates in the summer nre zero and many visitors are turned away. Even in winter, vacancy rates are low. The .coastal zone also contains a limited range of eating establishments with a large emphasis on luncheon-type and fast food fncilities and• fewer opportunities for a high quality evening dining experience. Provision of additional svening dining opportunities would create a broader range of establishments and might also attract.evening,visitars to the coast, perhaps for n stroll along the Pier or through Downtown shops. The. conrtnl zone, particularly the. Downtown area,. contains ltmitea entertainment fachitles. Theaters, for example, would be a desired • vial tor-serving use. The main strategy, of this clement to meet coastal policy regarding visitor-serving facilities Is to designate sufficent acreage in the coastal zone for .these uses. Two new land use categories have been developed.specifically to provide for the needs of coastal visitors. The first entogory is a r visitor serving commercial designation which will permit as principni uses hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, museu►ns, specialty and heach-related retail, and service , uses. The second. category. is a eafr++r► commercial/support, recreation* designntion which allows ail -tha uses permitted In visitor-serving commercial ns well as recreation uses. (See Section 10 for a full description of all land use categories.) . 3.3 CONCLUSIONS 't I Existingvisltor-servin' uses In the coastal zone g provide a wide, rango of services. However, the largo numbers of visitors attracted to recreation.areas # in -the coastal zone justify the provision of additional support facilities, particularly overnight accommodations and restaurants. The, plan designates sufficient arena strategically located to serve the needs of existing and future levels of visitors. The City's coastal policies further aim to nehievte the following objectives: Provision of lower cost visitor-serving fncilltics. increased numbers of hotel/motel rooms and restaurants in the coastal zone. Provision of additional areas for overnight recreational vehicle camping. 35. • '+...•... !Y' ,.....:. .... ., '' .. . ..c....•.. y:'�:.1....a a: .,..., v.r'G:`r.i:17f?.iif i•4.4G-•':•L+tF.tawrt+x..-..wwr^."" Besides encouraging the screening of existing pnrklnq facilities, the City has taken steps to restrict the use of additional bench areas for future pnrking lots. No new or expnnd(►d lots will be allowed at the beach except under special circumstances. This policy should contribute to the protection of the visual resources in the beach are:. Wetlands Wetland areas in. the coastal zone sire located between ©each Boulevard and the Santa. Ann River. Physical improvements to enhance the biological productivity, of .these nrears will also improve their scenic value. Such improvements to the City's wetlands could In constructing new or opening existing culverts In the County Flnod Control Channel that traverses the area to create tidal flushing and provide ponds for marine and intertidal rpecles. 4 i Buffering wetlands from adjacent land.uses is another physical improvement that. could enhance these areas. The City will develop specifications for acceptable buffering techniques which can protect sensitive habitats in 1 aesthetically pleasing ways. Additional visual improvements could Include: , landscaping"treatment on the • banks.of the flood control channels and relocation of visually and physically degrading structures such as *electrical* transmission lines*. where 'it is technically and economically feasible.* The City's policies regarding improving the amenities of these wetland areas r are discussed more fully In Section 6. Multi-story Development in the Downtown Area *The* iw►p« t *iievetopment* of mid-rise i+} �Iai+ (six`story)" strucl bees in tF; coastal zone would constitute a significant change in the character of the area. if this type of development occurs it will be imperative that • adequate provision for open space and setback he made to provide visual amenities. Variation In building heights should also be encouraged to avoid a single cluster of tall buildings overpowering the area. A "step" apprnr.eh may be preferred, In which taller buildings are sited inland from lower ones to hfford more views i of the sea and shoreline. The principal method fry incorporating these kinds of consideration into now development would be via n specific plan, which would include regulations for i heights,bulk and siting of buildings and open space. , i.. Pacific Coast Highway Status }; The, Scenic Higl)ways Clement recommends that the City pursue those actions f necessary for Pncific Coast Highway to nchieve State Srenic Highway status. t These actions would include 1) developing zoning ordinances regarding buildingf heights, setbacks, signing, density and other factors for roadside.. areas, Z encouraging undergrounding of utilities, wires .and pipes, *In'nccordnnce with the rules and regulations of the California Pubiic Utilities Commission * and 5 Developing a roadside maintenance control program*. and 4. e` liniinatinq billboards alone Pacific Coast Highway.* 4L ... .....�... ....._.. .. . _..._. ,.�.�..-.. ..��...... .. r....tl w. ... a.. .. •,....�i. w. •w. •.. . .(.,,.. ". !f: 1.. �. .avr.11'...I..rw.w.M.✓-iw'M.YM.4a++1a..v`*M.++.� it r i t =k 1d►YUt1A 1TLRE .y ! 7Si'A LtlF. TALMTVALLET UOLSA cinci MUSA SAY r"AW n�rtn 1 SEAM m ESA ' �"�••�����/i�O"ry�U�AryC�yH"���N% Bluff Areas C fiI wotG OWISIO� .C L t t . F t i • � �� �?� ^ � i ��� ter. U:G£.'!t� i •e+ - �„ • * I XIMARK FTATLR6 �' yr01 ' •�••� VISTA UNE TISTA SCOrF Ib f • C• Cf�I rA ,•v"'• !, .` •yam - SALMXT%OUII MAY `j 1 t' �' •+a"fir t�Ott� `� F l r \ 'r� [IttAT[�CTp!i� t•ot is 1 _ :'r•.• /•ttit _ �% '_ �r ,, • •. ilfllGltilL4A> ttkso%t !�tmttKL loft fit fT�•»..� _. 0.0 Blirli Areas Fig-i t 4.2 i The zoning ordinances developed to implement the Coastai Element will help address these actions. Local Scenic Routes The Scenic Highways Element also re_commends,that *3Dth�Stre'et'from Pacific Coast Hi h'wa .to Edh,ards Street be desi acted os n Local Scenic-Route.* •�+�e fry (see Figure.4.3.) die.( *tt-eoq-`- a' R ajan-4. From Nor-l-t This 44PWPA route *along the �o H��ritln ton" 8epch Nieaa!' would afford vistas of the ocean, shoreline, Bolan Chico and offshore islands. MaIgnation of Local Scenic Routes allows the applicaton of special land use and development controls on the adjacent properties to'protect and enhance scenic and aesthetic resources. Lundscape Corridors Finally,; the .Scenic Highways Element recommends designating the ro)lowing mjor access routes to the beach as Landscape corridors because: they provide scenic:, views or access to scenic areas: Beach'Boulevard from Adams Avehua to Pacific_Coast Highway, Brookhurst Street,from Hamiltrn Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway, Goldenwest Street .frum Huntington CentIrat Park to Pacific Coast Highway, take"Street from Yorktown Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway, Magnolia Street from Hamilton Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway and Warner Avenue from Bolan Chico Street to Pacific Coast Highway. Ail' these routes provide some views of the ocean and shoreline. Beach Boulevard and Brookhurst and Magnolia Streets also afford Vlows of vretlands areas, while Warner Avenue provides views of the Bolan Chica and surrounding bluffs. • The landscape corridors section of the Scenic Highways Element addresses landscaping, medians, grading ,restrictions, tree preservation, signing, setback requirements and other planning considerations which can help protect and enhance the visual resources of the route. implementntiun of the corridors program would significantly contribute to the improved appearance of the coastal zone. 4.3 cwcujsloo j The.. Huntington Beach coastal zone includes significant visual am tttes. � Policies In this pl:3nn are intended to protect these resources and provide strategies for a comprehensive approach to upgrading when necessary. The following arcs among the principal goals that the Coastal Element Intends to achieve regarding visual resources: Preservation of vistas from coastal *blufftops and the protection of the natural land form of the bluffs. improvement of the scenic ;,nd visual qualities of Pacific Coast Highway and other costal routes through sign regulation, parking lot landscaping and design review of new development. y�....».........�.•.............._-..-... ......r.....r,..Yr,o ......i. :=t a:. `n.+1. .�:r... .. ..�.... .r.....s.,... V•?..w,. .. -i•. .......,ii. ,. a:.iu:=ncS.�J;:,tMF.tna......••..--'"--- . � ._ � � 5fa1•�enrc 11r�raa '' %Iry Oppneluwsilt E i t L M.W.M. , _ r r� t1 � HMDNGTON W=% Scenic Routes � Ffgure PF IJAXNII ZlDidtli stair sernir ti L:nd.ra}w CAnidor f \ --m Loral Fra:r Rowe 1f t4 Y IAR WGMN 5E4CH GIIFORNM "*AUG Divem Scenic Robles . yNr • _ t •� The coastal land use plan reflects the reed for additional housing units` b y designating sufficient acreage in the coastal zone for low, medi . density residential development. +v--A,.ite�at4y um and Fiii3h sal-- ►swirl-eer�Eir+:.a 41mate}i�= 18�1�-lac -rtn.�-,—Wiz.-;~it�r�a filet-i�►�s�.-1`1Ada►�-A.�•a�sl���—� �e��rte+v�.#�u��s+►its;-tom. +otr�k.---k��r�si;►o--���e,�-w,�tiiff--wed#�-i�--,s��r9a•�-_ frt�ert—af-6�..frr�ife-` 44e4, i]evelo"ment' "of� thexplan. represent$ rn addition of a roximatel 5,5Q0 now hnusin units to t e exist nq 9tOCk. The Coastal, Act requires that housinga moderate income be pportunitles for persons of low. and Assessment of housing need by ncnme level consists largely of d and where debter provided. number of householdssud who are presently occupying unoffordable ho sing,gplus the number of screl, additional households the area might - reasnnabl be expected to holds modatc. SrAG makes estimates of the number'of lower . iRcomo;_househoids in need of housing assistance in its Re"'I '"', ' hlausin Ailocatiai� Model, updated in 0 camber 1976. SLAG also estimates a "fair sharo'� adjustment for each `city based ed on reglonai relationships' in. income '' • distribution, tlx: city proximity to jobs, its abilityto rind facilities, and expected communit provide public services growth. ,.., . According to SC+AG.there are presently 71595 low Inc ame hauseholcls,n aced of assistance In Huntington nonch. SCAT �'� households to be included as the City's fair shore ali��enea tian,dfari�aAtntal9af { IP527 low Inca me frousehoids needing assistance citywide;. The Federal Depnrirnent of Housing and Urban beivelnpment (HUM define lower income households as 1 s • those ear n er medlan Incame and moderate income ihouschoi � as thim D those cent Of.,the E30 re 1 de percent of tlx2 areriwide median Income, .both adjusted far household gold stze� HiJC? has establishers $19,500 as tf� rnedirin income for a: family -of,• four ire Orange County in 1970. Accoluiny ',; estimates from the 1979 Special Census, 2).5 percent of ail househ6ds in tiles r:oastai zone percent have 'moderate incomes. (See Figure 0.2. have low incomes and 12.2 I The State f)000riment of Housing .and Community Development hog defined affordable Iwusing as hiving monthly mortgage nr rent p h d 11 o not ayments which exceed 25 percent of the hoilsehnld Incame in the case► of lower whic Income +I households, or 30 percent in the case of moderate incorne households. The number of households in the coastal. zone Overpaying For shelter h.-Is been i I' estimated bused on responses to .questions in the 1979 Special Census. of Huntington t3rach. it should be not Hint the "nn response rate" an these questions was quite high. Actunl numbers prey e E justed to appropriate Include an proportion of those not responding, Among In%v income households # 1,140 are overpaying (703 renters and 321 awnprs), while 264 moderate Income' households are overpaying (119 renters and 145 owners), for a total of 1,360 households overpaying in the coastal zone. (See Figure a,J,) �! Ile - - . ..._. .1. ,.... _ r. ...... ...rA[.4 k _ `A ESTIMATED DWE-LUNG UNITS ANO POPU�dTION PROJECTiO[r4S i t - y i Existing Ultimate : Ultimate' i r 1979 Census Development Development General Plan{ Coastal'.Plan Units PcpuIatiora Units Population Units Population r, i `-Huntington Harbour Area 31417 7,592 4,058 11,112 4,144 11,347 Warner Avenue • i Ito Huntingtari Beach Mesa Bluffs 1,012 3,156 I,769. 5,309 1,638 4,995 Huntington Beach t ► ,Mesa Bluffs to Goidcnwest Street 58 198. .1,748 4,531, 1,748 4,531 { ' f Goldenwest.Stre'et f to Basch Boulevard .11821 2,871 4,657 10,276 4,330 9,60$ Beach Boulevard to Santa Rna River 966 2,351 912 2,336 912 2 336 TOTAL' 7,274 '_6,i68 13,144" 33,564 12,772 32,817 SOURCE: City 'of Huntington Beach, Development Services Department. Figure"SS'. ESTIM D DWELLING UNITS AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY COASTAL: DIVISION* r r l Existing Ultimata-, Ultimate UItlmate" Ultimate 1979 Census Development Development Development Development: General Plan Alternative-1 Alternative Alternative 3 1 Units ovulation Units Populatio:. Units" Population Units ~opulation Units Population Huntington Harbour Area 3,417 7,592 , 58 11,112 4,058 1 12: 4,058 11' 4,058 1:,lIZ Warner Avenue to Huntington Beach Mesa Bluffs 4012 3,I56 1,759 , 09e.14 Z38 4,995 1,638 4,995 11638 41995 Huntington Beach r Mesa Bluffs to f I 1 Goldenwest Street 58 198 1,748 4,531 1,74 4,531 1,74E 4,531 1,748 4,531 �'. Goldenwest Street to Beach Boulevard 1,821 2,871 ,�57 10,276 3,731 8,1 4 4,93I 10,921 5,100 11,317 iSanta'Ana Beach Boulevard to River 966 Z, 5 912 2,336 912- 2,336 917 Z 336 912 2,336 r }TOTAL ',L74 16,168 13,144 33,564t 12,067: 31;078 13 2g7 �, 95 13 456 34,293 NOTE: "See astal Division Figure 4.1 I - . SOURCE: ity of H�intington Beach, Development Services Department. . Figure 8.5\' 1 , Sewage from the. City's system is in turn tributary to the sewage system of the County Sonitotion Districts of Orange County (C nnc.). Sewage is conveyed through this system to the CS00(' Treatment Plant No. 2 lacnted south of Banning Street between Brookhuirst Street and the Santa Ann River. Treated sewage is discharged into the Pacific Ocean through a pipeline extending"five y miles out to sea. f fFigure 9.1 shows the location of county sewer facilities in the coastal zone. Construction Is in progress on two segments of the new coastal truink sewer. This project also includes,construction of a trunk sewer on Newland Street from Pacific Coast Highway south of. Hamilton Street, expected to be complete by the end of 1900. The District's Master Plan rolls for the extension of the coastal trunk sewer westerly from Lake Street to Golden46st ? 1 Street (Reach Three). Construction of this extension is planned for the summer of 1981, contingent upon securing the necessary funding and regulatory approvals. 9.1.3 Analysis City Facilities .tS, •According to the study conducted by Lowry and Associates there are several potentially,overloaded sewer pipelines In the Huntington ©each eoosLal zone requiring further observation or improvements. ' .These are the Edgewater Lane Sewer, the Warner,Avenue Trunk Sewer, and the ,. Orange - 22nd Street Sewer. The bitter two facilities are currently"flowing nt full capacity, unable to nccept nny additinnail sewage: The City's Public V�'orks 7 Department has identifier) the existing sower in Huntington Street as one which also may be overloaded at ultimate developmwil*.* ,►ice+-�f- •t�re+�-eer�sttti-Far+ Steps.'are currently being tnke'n to mitigate problems at all )ur of those ; facilities. The Edgewater Lane Sewer is bon'g studied as part of a larger + effort by the City's PU61lc Works Department to determine', the most economical ivny to relieve overloaded ,sewage pumping facilities 'in '.the Huntington Harbour. area., Plans hove been approved by the Mty for. a facility designed to relieve the Warner Avenue Trunk sewer. 'The Orange 22nd Street Sewer requires upgrading upgrading to serve the .Seacliff ,.Phase IV.., res)dentlal development recently approved by the Coastal*, Commission. As .port of the conditions of approval, the developers of"Seaclif f Iv are'required to mnko 'ail necessary improvements to,provid.i adequate seviagI capacity for the project. The existing sewer in Huntington Street Is being monitored periodically by the City and is currently addequate to accommodate existing sewage. levels. Should future monitoring results Indienie an overloaded condition, n parallel pipe would have to be' installed. Huntington Harbour has been Identified as having higher sewage flows than that which would be expected from known land uac conditions. Saltwater intrusion is particularly suspected as the primary unknnwn source becaiise the Harbour was originally tidal mnrshiand with high soil permeability. and groundwater levels, and therefore directly subject to tidal varlations. The Public Wnrks.Oepartment recently completed a study of saltwater intrusion Into- the Huntington Harbour area sewage facilities and'took actions neressary , i to remedy the identified problems. MSM5 .. ��....................�..rn,.�w-....r.•�wwvn...T.vwt Yw.Y 1.....N..• .. .( .1 )t.L:4 wi'f•. 1Jy.11'.• ♦ ..f. ..., =wY1.14 ../..+53.:'.w!'.lC'..J..:.1Y�.:,i 1'r i•.ri.w'."A:1.YI.INiat"JI\.►'3+'.�.L.X.AiR T r.;4'3.L]:XMY+�'�^"^"t•• ,,l I t • "1 vv .t 't tY t ��b i � y yyy l � X1 't +�tTY t• ,� ' � ,'cT � , , ,� .{f,��' �;fir a �� .��� �' , ,•: 1'�(J, .. �'� 7 C�f::� rY�S: •xe i 1, ai75S''' - ---- ,�tti�;YLIC-ii:.r[:.:�.1i1>. M!MtMM'ti^4 �, �Y+47' x, $ •���r` + i , , � + A , . � � +. � '� w ak t�.r tL+.ri� �•+_ �yf . i$�''t'+ ;,�r, ,�.,4 � .5{ 5 ,.!,� o .^,��tt.•� �S l�s R. i ,i< r: ` � �' y �arrr . 5' �r�r ��. ,# 4�'�+ Fgi ttY �'' S ,�. hq 4 .q•' 3 + , i a y Iy r, 91 .. td • pK? )� .b "t 3 j t C k� _ rr t +t+�e�f.�;i'A;. 1��� *. �ti• E1�+" ,# �'=,'+i p� �ow `�•L»• t l.� ,& :�!d-. .; ix +1� �'4�'` A�"�.;•'t$:�+. ''.C'• �`^".N> .,•: .1r •.�lri"►�,tt 3s'N, #� t t ,� s. b' �� •� } .'. .1 �r � tl ;t �' ;:; t t1= .+•��. 'a jj � rt,� t�". �R. �` �"};�,�,.� .• `j�J.r r�^�7r,}�'� +� b�^;S t,�+ .:a }SF � >ctr �.+ i�� �, 'k., r..� fi � J;3 3° ��{ .,<t�,�s � k�,••�y�,1`f' i'�y; �(, ,�' .,� +•� •�.':,, : ':� ;+�. S".h .� 't •Y i , a Y4,,� f.<� �1 �"'r YC� �,.c' a�... �^ t , :1 r,�'•;g'".i�� R�% �� {,+ � •,�?� � �� : �'';,;'•V,"r F,� .1�V y�l�'1ANOC t' �S t� 1�.=r�x�• ;f�;l' "';;r� a;,.`#Y k: {4 , 4. +; �` Yq�+�� �:Tjf j r �.. + y q 7 'Yp,'-r"t;g i,'.R'y" r -i ll ti:S �t Q �'Y n� '• l�ii i�'t:t�A Ii�:� ..:�'r '�1"4:4 ^7.ti 4 C�,1S4.!'91t�. kt i 1 4 -+•'� f..�l`t} •.?�t+.��7 3�'t�-r rr, !i.ti '•ssj�, ,�Will `t w f rt•. 1...! 'r 1+t,r-:a'.x.^i d <va.}.I� f: �%..•a+ ,( fir(}°.M LL y ,�. ..�y -�w. f`•• ..E�.. ; �'i y�J2'�!",�,�4,,y/l+ tfc. ;1'tk�!5�.,..!. r x,.iiiµr Itl;1�;9i tf f' + ti�ii� �' .��; .�!p"��� �.j ti j�d :�� r :1, ,� Q�f,:Y k" �,• "+' � .('« f.;t tr ti, � i.� S^ !•• , .SS��'�'��'rj ,y t I �•i i'� �,� `rt ,� 'S�wfjy�C'.�f��`i' ,!��.�`'�� ,� )t:� ,t. "+ �"t��"��'�,�� •i� 'Si�f �'�15�:"��•7 �'�.,t� �'�,�°� �:.��n!'j��f,'�t � ��'��i i� ��°J+�k,�{�•1�!3 + ,q '.t MAP ENO 4• .r 1 1 1 1. fi• r \,•'r..•.+•.w•.w..•.+.'t,!r^<..wR..'•W.1C�c'.G.k.rl.� ..n.., t+' •� •' §":' ... .. ... '. ... " /� ... .. X•:' -tt r� ♦wa.x\Y• ,.•..r.'.nrr ,. , \ .f a..•M+,t.Myr.w,v.•..+w�-,,.wry 1� i �• to • fell.�,,;•,�•rr♦•r•� •�3fr� •t+ter►. .J • `� 'f vt i. � � rya ���t `•. . � ;,_s: •••kt'.5 V::;.��� NOV -51 �e+yam ��'� •`��e ., .`p� � �.�'44'� • +� ``• r, ;• � ��� rip .y j,�• ,fir,.•.:, -, �+.Al '. • •�•., •,C, r. •YIf rI. of y • 10 a v 1 VOL vI 1• �t�•S '� � C Z7 9 � � Cl QI •�ti• o o r•� m p m x n �'•rr x V X p o tmt z < x ---- DISTRICT BOUNDARY LIT! BOUNDARY • •r�, ;-,, ��_•' ••�� f`. .•y` .................. DISTRICT TRUNK SEWER (EXISTI DISTRICT PUMP STATION (EXIST.) DISTRICT TRUNK SEWER (PRORI i'vS ��•. �✓ r. ,•'tiy�T••;tom J { Q DISTRICT DUMP STATION(PROP) '- ♦ ��i ,y f '; •'•'�.�a •-► ..............• CITY TRUNK SEWI.H tEXIST3 - ;K',y'�TQ`:• Z •. - i•4 • •bbo r. •i •v-�'•. CITY TRUNK SEWER IPAOP) 4 !�'i•,�`•.!• 'ad,• •.� ♦ a. ♦ ,•J�ti 'CJ.0'. , .'•.F ,`, CITY PUMP _ _ •i• -� pp.� �t• f, r• •�ri' •� '%y?��• v''� •• \ �"1 STATION tPAOP) ...� -s• �� �� �'♦'�:/ T `'i i i ` ra(�i°, rl••' CITY PUMP STATION {EXIST.} r2 1�t • ,y`,�•y 1•.fiy'�''►. _•�. 7i,:' •�"'./��40^. `.' ,�p�,�•�.`�� t�T���• � ♦�i','.�� •t .� :'.:'y7��,.i,���i� r, +'f�i•.• ! `� J �''�♦J~• •,, `rSa -�1 a♦� Y'��•♦ dam'•; f�� ���-""fit.• �♦ yiP L e ` -00, ♦�. .il{ ! .i 41 �'j�� •-• •�:L•'► N140 . 1 �w�:, 'fit 1►.i�< ^' ♦�•.,�:��; .:��<���`I.�` "4jy \ f s �,.y+`. t► �. :`! d����•:� ••i♦��. l :' ��l�yAs♦�'?tad- .• �r .'%, ':�.�+►' '%f�. ' "�„7S`. `� Tam Ni5 • Y.• J ��'•.• '•.<'� ♦• ``\ ..K'+1�HYL+" - -� •`w•II`•♦��...� .it; ��f J � I •ha,, i• ' k r• • .�•y.•��' '�;; ♦ '�:1itra�nliL�'•.. `• +�d.♦ mot• ��' ��.,�•�,e•♦�Ao'a � •` �. 1= •f'•tii '. '•.t�,!`4 ,t(j•;. � rd. '...yyy�w��._� . . � � � ♦ 7 f ♦ • •• �•< • �<• ,% 'v• �;•.••ter a+� • ♦� .�i,♦♦;{r!a �♦ �<"• �'`• a 3•.=.:.' '4t'.• •- �" a. •• *', .-�I.',,•"�t." '!•Z'•""r' woo t e' � '"—. —-- - r 4�'ast 4is:i���i'}stas_ "w•+rr+ r.�.�:�,' r•� �;- ,�'� �,, ��._,;,N•^� i I' �t w♦ :� wt a� i♦ va r t`'" :r: L csf^ b _ � .y• e• � d}�d' •tf!ear•.P _ - a♦� 4� w �,as � .�x���a �'� I+UNTd. =14 BEACH C&FO6Ntf♦ p1�1 �+ " City Ard County Sewage Facilities - - ._. •• - _' •s�.n�.o.r.a4•wt�w!•alT/eR44�!7�lASZ!i� - - i _ t.. ..- r. i..'�'�%F� ,1i t d �a` L .'�j '�3 'y+. t ,} Cyr• d 1 a�,. , , j e/1 S.t liy .. i , �`',�'�.�`�},�'. � �'. .a�. }`t"t�n4��XC •S, tt y-: // � i ,�.F � 'G. � � ,, �'j N v�l ti ..f1 � � .` j4,���1 ���y #� �!,•�Y �` ` �'�ftix+� �• ��� t'l + ,+ ��� � ,� �+M1 t� ' �`,� t i ! j ,�`. J re i, llll t' .�`', ^" Y,7,ttN n. >. j j ir" �;:f .1� r�'.fy rr„ y{ ``�i' .:• 'rr 'S' i''x �r`. ,fD �'�-. r'• j r City sewers in the Downtown area may also experience problems in the near future. These facilities are approximately 70 yoars old and in a deteriorating condition. Unless replaced, the sewers will continue to deteriorate resulting in cracks, infiltration acid possible backing up of sewage in certain areas. City Pump Stations An analysis of sewage capacity must also include the City's pump stations. If a unit should fail (luring peak loading conditions and flows exceed the capacity of the remaining pump, it is possible for sewage to back up into the sewer pipes. According to the City's Public Works Department, there are two locations In the coastal zone where the probability of such_ an overflow. Is severe:...The Warner Avenue/Edgewater and the Davenpurt Drive pump stations. Both of these stations are included in a City study to determine the best way to relieve capacity problems in the Huntington Harbour area. 9.1.4 Conclusions Existing. deficiencies in the sewer facilities that' serve the coastal.zone.hnve been identified for the City. Studies and improvements have been planned, funned, and in some canes are :now tinder., construction to remedy these • deficiencies. In addition, completion of the C:ounty's coastal trunk sewer from Lake to Goldenwest -Streets will be necessa;'y in order to accommodate pronmed development under t!I' '' - R v We coastal lRnd'u'se plan*. r The main objective of City coastal palley regarding sewers 13 as follows: Ensure,;'prior.to approval of new developrinent. that adequate sewage facilities can be provided to serve such development. j 9.2 DRAINAGt~ 9.2.1 Background i An explanation of what .is meant by the term "flood frequency" Is important for an 'understanding".of the issues.•involved' in drainage and flood control. Flood frequency is generally defined on a statistical basis in terms:of :the number of floods w;thin a specific period. For example, % 25-year frequency flood menns,the level of flooding that would he expected to occur an average j of once every 25 years. Similarly, n 100-year flood would, *on the average, J occur only once in 100. years. Lorge floods which occur infrayrtentiy' have greater storm runoff and potential for causing damage. Thus, drainage facilities must be designed to carry greater volumes of water in order to protect the city from the' impnctc of a 100-year flood as opposed to the Impacts of a 25-year flood. Regional Drainage Facilities ! The coastal zone is protected from flood damage by a combinotion of regional and local drainage facilities. The County of Orange provides countywide flood protection thrmigh a Flood Control District which is responsible for maintaining a system of regional flood control channels.' ` 99. t r •{, i � S� ! , r i s+. rrrxxx CREASED WATER DEMAND AT ULT161ATE DEVELOPMENT IN THE COASTAL Z aE; lncreasQ.in Wnter Use ells t Population Increase Needed } Over 1979 Levels AC/FT/ YR General Plan 17,396 2 0 1 Alternative 11 One 2,500 1 Alternative # Two ,727 30000 1 .j 4 Alternativefl Three 1©,1.3 3,000 1 S CEs City of Huntington Beach,-Public Works and Oevoloprii6nt Service Departments. DELET ED ;.102. Figure 9.1 •�rw.w•ar..rM•w�r•...'t`M•»..w+el•a..T.+,..,„ y.J.i a ..r'.:•'. a.. .i .,L. t ` �...ln r.7 r'.1�.nw•+..w:.k,...j,;....w- ._.-.Y en.rr,r ..�•r.riwe++w'..«,1.rrw..,.�.. . '1 'r ' •5 , t . , I i i INCREASED WATER DEMAND AT ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT IN THE COASTAL ZONE Increase in Water Use Wells Population Increase Needed Over 1979 Levels AC/FT/YR General Plan 17,396 2,900 1 Coastal Plan 10,123 3,000 1 I l SOURCE: City of I-luntington'Beach, Public Works and Development Service Departments. t s y T i i S. is 4102. Figure 9.3 3 eh().ifi4.t•�:k:w�•'+'1�;Yi. i."" ._i2: ..:+i.+•4`y+:3 i.. .;,.+t::t.a n......._..�. . --,.._........__. ......+.w....r....+....+.,...-�...+.+-�--7...,.. .. - f - - 'i r � i L t r• ' � !S mill 9.3 WATER SYSTEM 9.3.1 Background Southern California,.including the City's coastal zone, is a semi-arid region and adequate water supply depends upon outside or "Imported' sources of water. Much of .the .water supply for the City comes from the Colorado River and from northern California (via the California Aqueduct). Water from these two sources Is bought by the Orange County Plater District and spread in basins to replenish groundwater reserves in the area. The City receives approximately 75 percent of Its water supply from part of this groundwater reserve, which extends underneath the City. The City acquires the remaining 25 percent of its water supply directly from the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) via the West Orange County Water District Facilities. MWD 'mpar!s from both the Colorado River and Northern California. I' s The City water system includes eight we'Is, three reservoirs, booster pumps,a network of water lines for distribution, and emergency storage in the San Joaquin'Reservair. Elot wells varying In depth from 250 to 900 feet'presently provide the City A. With water. None of the eight wells In operation are located In the coastal t ( zone. 9.3.2 Analysis In evaluating the water system in they coastal znr.e, three factors must be taken Into accounts water supply, water trao.smission and water distribution. .4 Supply , Southern California,. Including the City's coastal zone, could face water shortages in the future because'of limited.capacity In the California Aqueduct and court decisions limiting the arnount of Colorado River water allocated to � r.. the State. Under present Institutional arrangements, however, adequate water Is available. Existing City wells are each capable of pumping .roughly 4,500 acre-feet :of water per year. ` p y The City's large groundwater basin is capable of supplying more water than Is currently pumped by the existing wells. increases in water demand in tlx: coastal zone will be met by the drilling of additional wells In the area outside the coastal zone. , Estimates of water demand are based on future population projection,. Figure f 9.3 sho%va the projected increase in population in the coastal zone over 1979 levels nt ultimate "build-out" of the existing general plan and for 'the ' coastal land use plan. The general measure used by the f City's Public Works Department for coastal areas is that one acre-foot of water per year is needed for every six residents. " )Y r� 1030 .,.A __.. ... .-...�ww.w,..�.a wcw...r,.,..,..a...ww+^.,ra,rc.a.art..ca .:t..ii ..i.. .. .. ';d�.i:•.,4..1'�y%',i-a-.u• ,i 7'a'.. ..:�4'-rii. .....»,.. nu.%.nc.A�.r..pinr.wavwn..a�+^..'..-. . r r K ti _ a• tto :� �, t , 4 r ; As shown, population increases in the coastal zone etape 64,0FARNVO would require the amount of water which could be supplied by one well. Bechuse of poor groundwater quality, wells within the coastal zone are not possible and must be located further inland. The City has previously recognized the need for additional wells. Funds for drilling one well were Included In the 1979-80 City budget. A second well. has been included in the City's five-year capital improvement plan. The addition of these two weNa according to the Public Works Department should ensure that water supply to the coastal zone will be adequate for proposed + development under the *donstal* land use .; e}t:epat►t-f im *plan* Transmission Transmission of water to the coastal zone is currently accomplished by water mains (pipes) which are generally 16 inches In diameter or greater. The City'ss Public Works Department has identified the need for new transmission water mains at several Incations"in'the coastal .zone In .order to meet projected needs. The Improvements necessary remain the snore under. • the existing general plan and the three coastal larch use, alternatives. The improvements Include new water transmission lines at the following locations: 1. t;oldenwest Street between Yorktown Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. 2. Pacific Coast Highway between Galdenwest Street and Mai gnolIn Avenue. 3. Beach Boulevard between Yorktown Avenue and Pacific roast Highway. 4. Atlanta "Avenue betiveer, Alnbama and First Streets, thence along First Street between Atlanta and Pacific Coast Highway. S. Sixth Street between Acacia Street anti Pacific Coast Highway, thence along Acacia Street to Alabama Street. Some additional needed improvements to water transmission facilities are already in the planning stages and thus, not Included in the above list. Expenditures for major transmission lines will be largely funded through ' development fees. �. Distribution� a transmitted f t After water is tr spitted from the yell site to a general area, it must be distributed to separate blocks. Distribution Is accomplished by writ or mains "generally less than 16 Inches In diameter. Where significant now development occurs in tho coastal zone, new water mains will have to be Installed. Private � developers will be etpected to provide these improvements. ' I 104. w.....•.:Y i.[(.+n 1.. ..Y..'I'-••F"...YY.w,[r'its.r[Y:.•.:.:.(/a...rt...Y'l.ww.. ..w.KRY�tl.{M�.,:.1t'..•i.tttN�.•Ii'Fi�M M.a.YY.�.._.......-.. R,/ « sn `t �pt3'�z r3i S ea �•t�t � 1y, I� �� 4Ms� �� IN ti �. "Y�1k: i�Yl't 3/"'►3j ��. [t � � 1, .�1 � �' � k �4,.''� y� t i ��}�.'! tk Lt1Y'�, 011 y�, i �!R >► ��t 1. t •F.•� I ��,.�r S' � ti.�� .�5 � 1� � .� r ll't ,�t 3' A! t. tt�',1.• R �\ tiil'.4. 1 . IT t Tw �d 7. ? MIS ii T 9 ' r :i 3 4 r .•• .... { •:S1�c7 ��a 7' r .r r a 4 J � AOOWD'QY MY COIPJUI. `; FM-cAt.UWI 104YA-OEC/2.1976 \ AUE IEGEND �...� t• �� � — FREEWAY STPEEI C OXY ! ., Y �•`� ,..r.aw. MAJOR 4,iOW PR i — ••� .. dAARY 30.000 • £ECO110ARY 24= .� NorE: � saw l•KS+curt 041416 1V,M1 Or SAI - ]Il1 ypt ►4GIssiR;r Vltr•tt .fM1 of *A, W�41 a as(22115 �rtss ww[�t M 1,1 +. /•� wr• iw. 1 .t, HUNIINCTQN pFACH CALIFORNIA Circ'Ulation Plat? Qf Arterial PLANNING DIVISION Streets And Highways i.. i06.. Figure 9.4 eW.w.ri.uwy Hr•.w..t1...b:..;,..,sn.w+•u•a.r-+.,•+.....sue-.,u�f:.��d:.'::::.•..�sLw . :a-:, .,..:J..S:.«i.. �/.7r:.1.'..;.......w x.....+..:.a.ct-+;i•.,.... ...a.••a..•ww w..r.wrw..w......�.�......_.. Aliv�,'�f.] y, it i�R i����\, IM le I Ntl r�1'�*y. �%6 .� rfil%� a �, + � i t4 t � + i �� r a, t �. _ ,i! l �t t ` �r"' y y Pill a ,� t- .r da t. st All' 14 x Ad It, f j�f 4 ,itf, 0 in ', 4 Z ,�'iR! �,a; 4: r !y i g!'f� r �• i, �- • •. � 11�' ��,» XAd�} lr Fj �• �>�,j n 1* a !}, �'��� i�Fa}t ,�� ;' �� ���y',yt� �{����f. �,f ,�'. �. 'rj�+. ` �+ �? �!K•y�{��+�yy��" .4a7jz=,u rti 'a�y F �9"Y', � Ei� R�1 r n'�, ,�,•x� �� �_�}��, I` t'L�� ! +� ,. •, /, � ii ',• ..rtj' 1 r. �'17�� A fl trtl Y, .r ri 1 .•� '.7, '� ,t'T.!'t'7,/X. �. '{ 1� l3l 1 i5 A / w r • I, • / • 7 ( / 1 Weekday Weekend • a, Weekday Weekend • r / l t { 1 r ExIstin/ . Alternative .1 �� • 11 Alternative Number Two Alternative Number Three 11 area bounded / Pacific Caist Highway, Fifth Strebt /i : • a . / / • • . i i 1 / 1 1' ' ' p v► a , �*�F i..�. Y, ;'. t r t .'r .•�vt l�'�t k', ,y"�r ` � �'. r: Y 1, ..f 1 .Vr.!_' �'].,�ty¢� i r 4 t / •, # H-• ! y t `!�, i h iptk � �1\� � '{ ' J. •4 ',�. � - 1 .: ���' A 1• 1�r't%y l�+�;1}M yl . � .�Rv r i FYI ,1 y,r. � J�'d �1 , r41/f. y t l,•1 ,,.. f �J ' ,! � r ; ' � rA, F �' t 7 � . .• � -� / + At ry 1'eR;, , ,' l e �': n_� �l T i,..•t' /,.,.•. ♦ v,,, � ',J' �'� of _4, : � Iti•, (r a y � '.•E ��� r '•11 't � � � r , 1�• �r Y t�, L ,a } i j d •. •y t It �� r , � � � ,• >, `N7 7 +�' 4. •'�S a rd r .1 �.t � � � � :fr �at� iyry �I" r 1'. 1 tyy�tf �rf.• !ti d y1 r �t.� 1 � r� ,►•1�j_5. �k'y. r,x ',� rl st�,L 4\ h. i' $ 1�, L y'1, � r „� 11 r$ 9 t 'A! ! n' ' •(! i r:' a') t !t! `'b i . t,�ii + y !1 + $('�jt'� 1� `Yr1r. sa " t.M1�� �,,ii r 1• , i �l 1a`7� r4 � yf"1yYT r ti '�}R�t 4 tl�"'} i r � ; ti� a'' '` !,. . i rlta� �a `r +ttt+p. ti' � i xIJ;,1V t � ++ y i f R + tA1 t rt r t + tt •6„s R :ytitra;, 1y, �., !.•��47 t S 1 ,bp e i f-J't t{ 1 f �) '1r ,:1°LLL��i �y 9 R ►'�,1 , # 1 J, ♦ a'°a r! 1 +.• t ? 5 l" i'j J'�,, y 4t',�r� +1 ; ` � • ! 4 P} '.' • r t "` ' � ►,1 /! M rat 1.y7r �, -1+fit+ 11 tiJ J r # 1 } i, �'i•�� t!�,'a+1':,{, 1�.���, `Y i 4 t `,� r F��✓�ty � 1� l..y�' 1?`l frr '• ��`� v�� �_1_��ti 1hvY .7t� 1�41�.t, ° t ,y� 15 � •� _"•� �! �h S fP 4.1t 4, ..t,vly �S : Ir ,1 ,i1`1 ,a 7 I} rho ]y{1,",;Ifrt1 : ri,,`�? st tiY 7. r' • � 1 '� rt%•� /Y,4 iv,{ •,17 T� {� +I7 �,� Al �{�'1, { ! .r1 tr t i 1,�' Si^k'. ✓srt + u1„�' ��°_. �i.f}:.' 4�� A:','�t �� ` -h y�,�,r '1• iv r�ti 1.•T J 'r14' �, '�6 1 .7, '¢r* .r kf {+�' r , -g. 'lt� V k ,�ti 14�(# rt �`q r, r�#�);�i��u / >,kM• �'a�, 4 ,••�''.• fti �f ,1�°�,ti j�i �T ��i ��\.f..�:`f �a� S It.{�,i k 5}y 51�•r} �r It{�.�,i�'1�y 1�..,��R�I �;��'� ti�`•�"1a�Ya��Qab���•JF :••`� ��'��•!� , ..ttt( e R 4 .rt' � .' / 1.{� t • ♦• r. 1� #.,'i . •♦,}are { r ,J"' 1 } 1 1#, \�,Y �7 •`�' 1 • 1 ��L. •�-� �1 y,.�'� �Y � 1 Y'• ,� Yi *a �y'� 4 {11�1�,t'��� �'V��'�•{ ,,f tt4���� t �il.+.��..., %„ t}• i r7 ��i) k ��"!� , �;{ �.�!i�.���' � �� t� ��,���""�"n��Y �����, �]�' �, ��'r; �. �tirJ/y, 4t lri,�� �� ;r 1 }r t { re ♦Sr �t+v� ? � ���'#S�J .(ry . ,r1.;."� i ��1�1 � �[.,�}.q ��j,, r" �t •.'� .� 4 �4. 1 1'•�'r� 7r y"'�+l'.� y t1t� ��s.r t a,`�. t Ixt }' r'+lL � 4( �' �• �� r r7 4 2•� ,fit. y f vtr •.S � i i 'K1,) �. /15 .y , r�y.,J.sy:. (y�1,y It+t� � y { + "`'R,! h �y..,1 �.� %fss,r}:�a i 4x`p � �t�r,I �4r •� 4' �y . 1 '.71 t ^ti 'ill � ! a. 1 (i'Lf4r�4� vy; ! ( k' rl\" rl •tif rrM� p� "�'t '• �•4 "� Z�' .� t17 �1 t:, t�hft /r{ 14. �a 11�1+}�t ''?{r J1.�hi,? 3• .. • t' I.f+. r�,. ',�..'� �,:Ir� r. .'•� .Ji.•L. 1•, A. +t w�-r,... .� .�.�n�•. y .tNr' •;p. y� •.r' � `. / i •i• i; y �. !' �7 rA; +.' '4''� 7*�.• .Dr ;G +'S, •.::. ■y.' r b+w.�; lnr c.k +� ` •+. i ,i 1 r � 1 1. '{ 1 fir, a 1 ,iV' +V'i,. ..I! r{a1#•} ul' .rh �� i' ¢ ff:t {.�+-�j 9•�,Y � y,';�r �,�e' 'S •l�l i�r4 � �`s, 4 l 'a}',,�j, 4�"��/,•y� .;'t , af;'� 7 �1 �+ �:rtw.'`�'a r ..jr��#" '�'S.`�' •,1,�' '.•2 1":',t'',Y 'i+'.•1 ,�'w,�r-'r � S }\ v ,i • -�.' 1 '� � 1 , ' � 1 rc �lyl �• Ir y }•� 1!} i�A ,t 1/rC". i ,r` '1 � �.l E 'S'A 'G iy 7�. / ' i t• t� .tr w�. M,.% � ��, .� Mla ��' 1 }} { ` 1 `ti ,���,^'' ,1'�.� 'i1 f� •G + j a` !� �t.l ,f�,1'yX �1„ ! +If �i t al } t �iw N .°• 4' ,� 1", x!�r','r t7V `• „'t f�r ,•a j. � S �'- :', .r N 1,.� 4•♦r�Y>p..'. t� n i�> 'f•, }}. � 1�Y..i,,,r ,1.� .+4. s' �+•' l l�i'1#'•r t,"r f y�,•'�,�ZZ•�rYt �..Y�R r t1�'r}' �^s y�sJ`,�.�',14..rti+-G�rl,rr a ,� �,Y,1��/? .,:$.r L,, , .. ,..1 �. r y �t1.. ,t S ,<,1 ..'�. i, � --i� i,4., � � }}((��f�.�} ',•nr,�i•t �41 i�• t Wit;;; ..n t£r 7< vy / / 4;�' •�3 � } _ 1 �Y -�' ]v X�� 4 ••. '�:M�r\ 1i �r•� 1 r 't 1. .11, � • �' �`� lC�+ �' r( t 1 ' {•1 /l. �%5 }"}�� +' 1`f i:. .t�:t r�/ dq. �r�,itrh t-h�e�u o•;;J TtTY jtrFF,,�'e�;. �fit.,t� L`'�t•tt''S+F�� '1��'i Fs�1t�µ +✓ �1 �}, .k';!ia y. 1*+ r r{ }�4.i� 1tL;57 + syX.i.7f�ltiey•��`:.Y 1� 't�f' 1yt y+l7) ` If f � +' .`{�' tyy.•�rtt1 rr1' rl �iti �f i ti` ' (C �"•�::e #% •t l.4'a rnw���y..,�-+�;��''° >ir.?kJt ` ;.;'j� !`: d 1 �t � �1 A�} '''ti,�S'�'•� a`f 71kY;r,+7��� '",'ya ,N.,l� ,��„\a� -rC � 1"X'. wil. lur w�� � � *Y t�'i3�7 r 1 L 1�`F '•, ,�, f � l;,•tr r ..' •� ` . + - ,{i r 1 IJ r�.. ' ' + :� ���� �''� V ji>. � , ti a�•' / v.'.r /`� - �i�� � � 1`` ' � +y�. • 4a` S f � �' T D R �X � ,�!`r-�i�a. .�� ,7 t. " 1 .�,y 'r `y tRs 'C"t .+t ��� � '�S,;� �'�� � �,i �j 'y" � �+:� `t�� +�}�, �,t{ t�t���• �� h i�j' � �,� �� �} �� �`'' f .� }� �-'+r` � }tir ��s `^rj�,u 'i '� �t" 1 ? '•f�. ����1 {.'S, ,�"�i r�. r• 1 � ��, � � �,�� t� t � Y 15c, iir t il � � " Ea N.iT �, A tr iIf Ity Ali 11 �+, 8 £. ,c +:.' .,� .< n +1: :► �� -Ss:t. ►,� 1 � ,�r' • ���,� x. a '':' 'w. �! �� + �, al>{,�!? f►� it ��, ���' i 1• !µ ��..��=. a r �u .•.Y 1 .:1. 1�.t.t4 �i t� .I , I 1 • rr. � 1 � �,r � +rt �txt .,t: � i qt� ,r , !' i.t ' ; �� .2 ' � ► iv, ! r �� ; ',� �}t�`� r�; 5`� {.trl+ + ��4 ti � .�� 7 r�'; 1 t•+.s}• rn���,'{] i � .q` •..:{ a� ty ,1 `i � 1 �� ` .11r t -,� i Mt: +. t ',r ` " 1 .�� w a t. �ti. r r'. i �. :T, Lt •' t !I 1. •ti' ! , . 4 A `}� .�'�rt i t t � 1 r -�*� :` 1 (/ a' �, �l 1 �M ' t+. i c , r ♦ t 1 �' + *�,� ,1� , �� - , r � .I � t ,.. 1�1. � ! f J', yl,t}... kfl�'- f�,� 4r��•'.i1 � •.�� ! J �t•� - �� f � r � t N 4� l ,� iti Z .,'M1 jfa'.'4 , lr '�� Y` r• t��,wL�� '! � Iry � t'' �t �; is r '�'. .�, i � r •�5 as 'A�i' t ��� f ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT BOARDING AND ALIGHTING ACTIVITY (Pacific Coast Highway at Lnkc Straet), 1979 1995 Average Summer Summer Average Summer Summer , Weekday Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekday Weekend' OCTO Local Service 265 1,654 2,402 620 3,854 5,783 SOURCE: O.C.T.D., Huntington Beach Transportation Center Location Study, 1900. Figure 9.7 ' • 'to ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GENERATED BY LAND USES WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AT ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT" Total Trip Ends (Per Day) " Existing Downtown 7,360 Coastal Plan 19,400 NOTE: "Includes the area bounded by Pacific Coast Highway,Sixth Street, !_nks Street and the coastal zone boundary; recreation trips generated by the beach are not included. SOURCE: City of Huntington Beach, Development Services Department. 112. Figure 9.0 �,y....+., .._............._.�_......,...... .......r.r. .+. „'i^•ja',• .i..a..:..+".. -...,_ ..,...•.7; rN.i.fr.. [' ,�. .. ..:f; -,+.. ...... .. ... ...... �. .1...t 7SAt.Wr,R./"+..w•.o+r..rr.w•..-.+..+' . a � � r , y Ili Downtown Circulation The existing arterial system currently exhibits no significant problems in 1 accommodating traffic in the Downtown area, with the exception of congestion on Pacific Coast Highway during the summer when beach use Is mnnt Intense. The recently adopted precise plan of alignment for the Atlanta/Lake/Orange Intersection is designed to facilitate a parallel east-west route along the Orange/Atlanta corridor to accommodate local traffic and relieve seasonal congestion on Pacific Coast Highway. 'rho ability of the Downtown arterial system to accommodate substantial Increases In traffic Is, however, limited by the inadequate rights-of-way of older streets (Orange Avenue and Main Street), recent reductions in the widths of Lake Street and Atlanta Avenue, and the desire to protect the predominantly residential character of the areas along Main and Lake Streets. Figure 9.0 shows estimated volumes of daily traffic generated by eat N3ri;o.•*aicistin: andprq�o3ed* land use*s* e4eff�64ves in the Immediate vicinity"•of the Downtown core. Nh-eeefr-e1trKaT-a *A* worst case situation is used, assuming.development .will occur to the mos't intense level allowed. In actuality, this level of Intensity is unlikely to materialize, or may • take many years. As shown, traffic generated by existing uses, in..the area bounded .by Pacific Coast Highway, Fifth Street, Lake Street and the coastal zone boundary creates approximately 7,400 trip ends per day. This does not Include recreation traffic which also uses arterials in this area for beach acce3s. r Pro�ecfed-fra�ffc-f'rert�-devcriapmsnt t�nd��-Altem�tt-fva-Agee-{s-ebattE�'8-palest I +itst� i -t#et-aaaseietecf-with-ex�sNng-E�wntewt�-useecta�pri�tet�lly ppnent ine.waeA--ir}- rferal--eemmere1ei-eritl-s4fibe-peso--er+d-=Nte-•!ri}�Iinc�--ef pia E-7 oeevino--agt�ere--featege.--E{ �e�+saeaf#-�Elaf#ie--fie retecl y-vie�tor-Mewl sear-Pe_jAJ4 6oeeN-iiqhwey id AWnm weWd-be-e*peeted=xd ymm6todafe-frofior neE a t6i iels,---keel-tref le rid--fPe""onerel-i ces -iakMet-�R-eanlh-me Main.nd-6ok"tree�f--howevv�rr liR rear+verelort-i}€�-P.�ein-£treeE--Ee eAd-weft+o-will-f3leoe-ineFaaee�l-ainpkieai9-o F-1Ft�t-end-qhird SMeatm.the re elignt�tw -of--�4t-lenlrAveenrc--tt�-- 4eet4y--eaiineet to Grange;Aycmu�lf f obebly-�4neresse-Et ff4e-art-8rens --f�v se--As-nn-a4Een�ete-feuE0 Ear-Pcel€4e Ettos�-i-44gitweYr--Bsvc4o fimcM�-of-nisi!or-serYin�mrncrc4eti-tise�a}�c��cKie ekar--& 'er r one' -wi#-mi�4rrnee_rrtrfn u,--gin+ Ffie--f�ey,�-cam Pe�4f�-�egt-blic�wey�. +Pro eetod tceffl �yoi�lmeeofritiiftltimaterdeyalo•'meni:t6nder`!ttieE oastal an use aTntarom roximatel'} 3-timew,volumes"associated�w tR s oxistinq useo n the,,. owntowniarea.*a Much it of A this k Increas6f Is:,.attributed atoi4 more-' ntense' realdentioliwo cewan �-commercial*aevelp ment +157 tR;care 7..:areqj�wslcs., qffectw rlmar tinnta.i venuen and anc La treets:- econ ar actsfon o enwest r,treet:"an : eac -Boulevard ma ,a so•occur °'especially urn .commut Ing:hourst-an ur +w.tmmer months,.w en;recreat ono traf f is is greatest. A. mora -detalled traffic anal tie s conta ne n the technical y report pre area Sy Me 052artment of Develoement Services.* I i 7 c. f fs f w •z1 P ::df�!PR ��'� ,• �d�'�����. F•i+ ''t4��. ,��� c �+,4x �I,'���rt ��),�+'t .�� *' ,, �,�•n {���i� j-� Y "'�.•(;, S i t � Y 59 � 'A.i�Y 't�•i( � 11�`i '_ ,U � � ! ��y� �c !! �����t A � � t; ��!''� t;'7!t� �• ,�''r i �fLt't�!1 G . + c1}}� �� �t��i� s! ,��< �� � CJ�'� �. }� ,� v. ; a4� �! � r t i•.�.r � ,�+��1!T` (��+ESL �• i � •�I�i`� ��{{{ �Y� � .+� 'K�� s +.�i Y y �� N ,IJ�.`� � �j fi, F' .$t ) ICtf'�t, '' gyp♦{j ,t f' +��s�r�, ,1!s ,'t'T1 r�.,r �3y.��, �`S`+ ,�� ( ! MP'� .r'x. �� ,� ���s� T.fi• ;�i�i� �"�lt: 4'-:,r+�'t�?�t ,� .aCY,(1 �1N4t� r A '� . �s�i � i r ."y : i • i • • s • x Y 3 i i • • • • • s z • • • • s • • •x r � ) s • i • S i • s • i r • • •r o r • i • • i • • • • s s r • s +. c • r + • . = i : • • s • i s • • i • i • • i i t • •x • 1 E ri •J .i 4Y f' t c}„ �AS ,s cj•t � i5 ,`�y�hS.�'`'r,�4+: 't 'yr+1''^,, i,,•n 1•Ik i;T/,3i;r'".d+'il.' ! `J•j"' {{,, X: t•..��. •{! •!+; )•t tt:. i !•a. +► {.7{t,i ( .r .r v iF} .i, . �i_rw 7J1 � y, fJ �rIJ ;2t '� t�17:" ► t,5.\'••;Y �"t': if. 't•i ' t'� • Fj Zf•'A Y. r F• •.J r �d �fi� t .l�j �yi� ;,•1' ,{ L +1 .� �,lP r •- •4',3 S�r��! 1( y4�'V'�'�. 11..h r ' �� �• V, .� < 7 'r i J rA,�cG f b51:" 1 sYv_ i�1� '�'J^ its � ,, '1r•1..?' t a2 : 1. 7' r P ._. 3" z'! -j�'Y'•' +�i.`t {�3sY t Y -�► 7 r.�;lf n iJ.„t � a t }�,� •���f •,S d;t r� �"� � ..1" �, 11 A.,4 :>< i,�'� ),r.,l,� � •4,�'` (-.S�Ut,ft�}..rr ►.� ..t.}�Mt! } �. •I 'T�•�MA� t•}t�. r�'.'fh 1", 4 .,} r_ �y C . 1a 1; , t 'N t r,� 1 f � r, r n ,�+l,�:.t�, , ..,r♦ }+9i. _ "1'hr 1' } + I t�,'- r� Wit, r-r(... � # 4 t �, t: � v �y °� '� }r +ty *4P.,� t , '.a U Yy �, i }�' r• d St.'I' a a ,y d7� r K��'1+ J. 1 t } t •; � 1 : hr - 1 ' � '(`. .?',�jr iu � 1 E 3t, .• s � ,( tr i r (' }Z.11 r >• i.V r 6 ',M 1j ��,r ,} w. ''1 4 ,'t' !,,{ Fl t� ,.t '(Il �'r� tt ry d4'IA "+,Jf i1 . ��+'tir,/k}'.• � 5 ` �1 kr•f� t Qi..t rh. � � k� �.y' '�{J "� x �t.,C ♦� �- Q � ',1'�'1 .�'.' r i1 t�i- ` � � � 5'•`'1• { 'i� . .\� 1 tl.. ��• . ,., 1 � .'.� Y r ,�!✓' ik y � { "r J rf 1 .'1'• i i,l s,. f ,•3 y � �" l.."yA. ',�.r ,r rn Rf 1 �,� �f' �� rir.: r4+,' T �tiY ,�t'4 d+ ti l`r ♦ � r 4 t r r't { \r5:*�r"� �5 ( ''t ' �•r` r } r• � ► i iQ� T r ; h .� r t .`,� JI ti; •+'! T ^1- iy r J+ �t f f 7 !� t , ,rh fit � k. }, t � ,,�, � ,..(., } 1 ! ,:' j .,•. , *,' ,,i p l ":'il �1i 1 �ri .y;, ; rr• Rtlyl'� i'j1 4it\.. r ,� A rl4 �V 'r L111 S 1 4. \i51. �r T.A,.y 1R r :. 1t 4 ,. ,r {� �}" �� �.f'`}r { � � r 1 • + r i ?L 5 ••�. f. h t ��•,4 � � } t j i 1 ? 'f�• �, � ,-•9 ,t t 54 rr r 1t +' r t{� r �. {f� i 3� t>v •,� y,1�`,�' 1.� � ��i a.y�i,.1 r.4 �+aY ���+� r�r f�' M� '+I+ 1 •"t,�rt,Ri+(Yr r�1 �'Y�E°N{ ��'4 i c 1 'u 1 ri t ,r,', i`l,��tlCi a< cF•j,�,y�{l�'}f y} '�.M � f�1-t rsv ';{ti "`Z }�ti�1tt 1� '�'* �-Y .,1 f r��.r, ( y �r;Y l,A (y'. � .r�, "�6 r r , �tii� rr� ,t1t � ��Sl;�� `� y�i i L'I' Y �� , r. �itt� •j..J+''�" .1 i}v��`t }y/{tl {1"!i� rrl.t � i L r� / r`.y .. ,L 4: t 1 �•irY �'r r,ti1,�� , A A �. Try ti A i `Nlr l{ ` �� Y•i+ , i N'4 j, j l p.�t•ij .y�t' n ri ) +, { { 1f �`t. �• Y a{ # j. i;.4C�y �w Ml 1}y�"� r 4• �7���s�'�a`t �' �+t"«, �1� IT•i'• �. ^•�i+ �. 4 �� /1' r�Ax �L fi,r ui / V�}•SP,t' 1 t {it i �,(}�{ {�ilt k'� L �.�i�t 'tr frt.:•,'. t• r w '� R ttti ri t d /{• r } 1t�p at ,, { w !• � 1'4 �Stil r -� `r„?i1.n "� '#( Y y r�l�lf �} i� t :,. ' �l 'i• �' r�l{• �;� t t. . � a r' 'A r, "t�• � 1+ { a£.�t` t y t . �tj.�1�,,"''4� �1A•'), ` 2',x • . a}" �J'� � +�rrt ttt F f jy $ Y.. ii �.ttl �44 ► -j R' irrL�� `ry �3 � 1i) jt c{� � �} 3r t j3},! 1 {J �3rt\j� t'F 1''Ayt '` r � z•'�.• �.1d'.�.'ttSF�k,, � .�}5 X. { ♦��.,t�h��,:►.� c.5}. +G•T %��}t~„A,r/ 1 i+, .� 'k 1` "I.�t't l't b�t 1•".�'''4.�'.�.+..�+ r' S N r x�!k } . � { s.� �+� d��, f; t��,�'�r ��� .�r ��J n h{, �•ir��• ���,1� �i.�'`{���'Ts.M}i�.t ' � �}' 31 �i �l;L�7i. y �'.'/,f � r Ctxr �r r , i 3? '.-�"Y«L \'�;,�'i,` -t��y,�,'., � �{��' },�.�$ � r�1S ��y�t,.. ��}f'1 �• �;,��!�� .S�1' tt ; •t� �;ti'�y r����c`:�♦ �'�' Y `�'ir;t��t�i ��•k�''#(2it �f�i,�lt��I.b�'x't+1i1 .V• �1l:?i����t + 't�X�w :"RS,T��'L� ,'�fl �1^ r'�i' r �I 41 �"1 � r �reFi t�,x�„i ��r��, �*�.�rS.e:+t'� e,}.�•�'rl'�Mrt ��,"� r4't1r��•l��.ft'Pj•14 � �. } bP-� ,�j}�;)I . IA.ti •� ;Y l � 1S S , t t,.wi 1'-"' .�.�:Ir e/ 41+' • 4 i'' \i?• ;4 '1' Y',,y, t . `3"� 'r't a'•:. T•.♦ r .. . r a._ • M '.�';i .k '1 ' ria" :� '+r .:i •>r: �1: �,' 1•;- „, n •1S.ri� •'+'' t+. .,�. ;y.,� ;},. Alf 4, %_. ttrrS r �r {' *tl\��?S• ji...'•.{P `+ ¢t�.lk•L �t t 1 1�r7�J. �j h .:► t`1�jM.{'• '.� ►'�..x'�ji; ;1'...i�� 'r r,p it + . 3,{1 r^, r;�t }yt t s ` T� ati'J` 'f1, t !� ►:tH i} 71k�4 �)j1 ►,. v .{y�tr!r +;}`f} j?� t U -N, ¢�F/�.��� � t�� Y ,� .A ST i iI�r+ ♦�"�+ �'p, � i ii7 a•'+ .j I J." 1�� �� �`y'�� 3 "L,'t �1 f.",t, ���E�`Y� L"rfi•T� �,7�s' ��� Y• 1 rf.r ,r•n rrlia y 'irC 3. "#� r ? ► , •"�. G h t, ( r !1: %t CeK '., 11t' �'ijZ+� tat. 'r�itJ ,� 71• �.:t 1 .,, .� r`,ytt-> 1�ti t«� �� �� r � ..�.�� ��'��'�'�• Zhtt i 1»��cr ,� t� ,� � i •T�fi'� �' " a * • t (•� �+ ,}!.`j't ,fit, `� , 1 yp ,,t , •1 f � rt.e f ','•RY141 �trri.' P .: ' ;t ', a r 1 „ xl .f5',`'s 1` frr,.'tS �5 �t �' ,�� {_� t' a f(1�,1'•f.:�•, t3 , k e � �. �� �. �wZ "�+{��; kit �'� � � +.+eJ�', �' r°t Ita } L i' .,i y 1,y{�c i x 1 „� '' ,. .,• .r � �7F t- � ��t 4• ,��t,�: r `"1 +i3A }�`{�t lr r P! T fe : ! ! .-, i !. ,' S•A3 i�� ..1 i } j}� r -rl a t 4 v�• ,r'4���t`by•t ..•f 1 . 7' {, t � r Y J ►. ! 1i1 �1 'tt ' ,• �)t G`.� �(r �lla�" .n,,, •�, �':1:i � A . � . %� t .��1 t h �°�1 �tit ,• Cr t7 t'} {���i } {� ��1 �5 e.t� 1•,�1't,�+ r V r+,� k, i t��i� i � rW� Fi, l� ., l`•tl `. .:y iA',st':t,_ es i �rho„':+.i x„...t,�� :) r,1,ViAPt..�YI,���''.�:�� ..� ":",.'� �'� ,:�.�i�={�La'(f1w•sr��P-71�S,tti�S� Cr���� {4�.�!�:.�r�".-.t'Vi3�i�T.fi/I.��PY�tf t 10. Cda' stal LOW Use Plan ,. 10.1 BACKGROUND The previous sections of this document identified the significant issues related to the Huntington 8pach coastal zone and discussed in general,terms the City's strategies for resolving those issues. The following section presents the land use plan which In total, represents the City's pinn for protecting, enhancing and.managing Its coastal resources. The plan consists of two parts. 1) a text describing land use categories along with }a map t tAatroa • depicting where those categories Kive been applied, and 2) policies which further protect coastal resources. The coastal land use categories and mapsp are presented first. They are the principal tool usrr4 by the City to indicate the neceptable locotlons for different kinds and intensities of land uses. The category descriptions set forth tfvj use or combination of compatible uses that would be allowed under each designation. The land use map*-•em *is* accompanied by area-by-area descriptions; the text explains where changes to tly► existing General Plan have been made in the cor stnl zone, and how those changes halp to serve Coastal Act requirements. Lostiy, policies are presented which provirk3 a framework for future land use decisions. I 119 i ;r • '1 ''t 10.2 LAND USE CATEGORIES The land use plan utilizes the same designntions currently found in the Land Use .Element, as well as six new or revised. designations which more specifically reflect intended coastal land uses. Thin. section describes the various categories and briefly discusses their relationship within the coastal zone. 10.2.1 Residential Residential uses are planned for approximatc;.y 1,600 acres of the coastal zane, to provide: opportunities for people to live npor tl>e coast. A range of allowable residential densities is proposed in keeping with thq City's goal to provith a variety of txausim" opportunities by type, tenure, and cost for households of ail sizes throug':out the City. All of the fallowing residential designations also allow certain support uses by special permit: elementary and private schonl-. neighborhood parks and private recreation areas, churches, fire stations, utility substations, day care centers, and convenience commercial centers (less than 1.5 acres in size). Law Density - The_I my density designation is intended to provide the lowest • intensity of residential development in the coastal zone and is applied.to areas where residential uses currently exist or are planned to be developnd at an lntpnsity,of less than seven dwelling units per gross arse of land. Principal uses permitted under the low density residential designation include detached s!-jgle family dwellings, condaminiums, and mobile home p>arks. Primary areas M for low density include sites bounded by arterial higlrvaya and conveniently T served by nearby elementary schools, commercial development and park and recreation areas. Medium Density - This designation pravides for more intense housing development and nilows sa density range of seven to %5 dwelling units per.gross acre of Innd. Principal uses Include amdortriniums, single family dwellings In smnll lot. areas, small rnultiple•fiamily npnrtrnents (2-4 units), and mobile (tome parks. Medium density residential uses are located convenient to schools, parks, shappitig areas, i,nd primary transportation routes, and may act as buffers or transitions between low and higher density residential areas and ( between residential and more Intense non-residential uses. High Density - Tho high density designation provides I,,ir the most rnncentratpd residential development in the coastal zone +re?t-ia-+� ►eiaie�lt4r» -nl`- r! --irt-sp�.•eif1�-oia�-�riErt ev��wshi�r-e�ae#t-�+s-Noe•-�awnie�--tw�-0•-i'dew+aE�Yrrtr-}unit-e.�l--il+!�rir�pn►��M+�e kak�al�►a-ttuar�-.35..++ait�a-�a�c�..-+a}a �it t-n4�-�--gttw4+o�ai-e+►aa�l�� e Fi( iri/ali �rd4 iif�--�HyAl Ali--dFww--catacarcli t +l ray.--��iia�- t.►ntMp--perf";OA •w *4c+►7�--la-�trxr_�-gat+-nr+•-�+ieentiYe-X�at-c=(xaai�lTck+Nara-carNO-etaHr��i�itef!-•tka+rol�ffr�+!�. Aim--Yri+et�-ta+cr--3�rt���a-•+ae n�+�riii-•eta�ae*�+t�e.�l�v,�i•ll-•taw-eia�f fr.�Y' -i%#*w #- et6- e>pt} eink 'While there Is no upper limit on dersit _under the high density land usta designation, the C:IIt 'a�zo_n_i_n_g�ordinrancea permit residential evelo rnenL• to a maximum off units itper acre. -T io nd22tIon aria new zoning district or ecific pinn__wn{ald be necessnryr to allow residential ! davelapment in excess of 35 t!nits per acre." '120. y. • y Commercial/support Recreatlon# - This designation conditionally„ allows„seereaMen *corrmorclal* facilities as W major use and 4emwtere�a31< *recreational* facilities as a support use. it is especially ,,ppaoprlaatea for large areas wh ch can be planned as one., coordinated � development. The City'sa Intent is to encourage ��i al *uses that are open to then public and that capitalize on the mild cilmote and beach location. € 4l -4vit-nal, 11— O"d #r4sacllities such a restourrnts and hotels will be encouraged re part of a rvorlr mated development*.* Im t aM e t► 48. 10.2.4 Industrial Industrial uses in the Huntington Beach coastal zone are limited almost exclusively to those facilities associated with the extraction, storages and transmission of oil and natural gas. Although the actual area designated for Industrial activities represents only about. 4.5 percent of the coastal' zone~ these uses nonetheless have n significant influence on the eeon6mle"viability of the area and the City as a whole. The categories of Industrial land uses planned for the coastal zone are described below. . General -'Industry which is not coastal dependent Is generally not encouraged In the coastal zone. However, this category is included In the land use plan In recognition that some llc-4t Industry is already located In the City's coestai zone away from the shoreline and near energy and other compnU6,10 U-ces- Principal uses permitted under this designation include light manufacturing, ~assembly, packaging, electronics, wholesale distribution, 'machine shops, r waref rinsing, storager administrative offices, and service uses. Resoa,.,e Production - The resource production designation is intended to nccommudnta ccoastal-dependent enefe y 2E* �.ctivitles. Principal permitted uses Include oil wells, injection equipment,srra.aration and treatment facilities, storage tanks, transmission lines, equipment s:toragn and maintenance yards, 5 tared administrative offices. This designation Is not applied to areas where • small-scale all production ~activity takes place In conjunction with other primary lanai uses. Bather, the resource production design.;;lon is used for areas where the extraction, separation, storage, and trran"',mission of crude oil , constitutes the primary land use rind Is anticipated to be the major use for the I next 15-30 years. 10.2.5 Open Sence Open space constitutes tarn Important entegory of uses in the coastal zone. The Coastal Act identifies several policy areas - shoreline ncress, recreation and environmentally sensitive habitats - that are implemented primarily through open spnca designaations. The ~_and Me Element currently has only one opera space emsignntion to cover conservation, resourcea protection, recreation, prark$ and scenic corridor areas. To more necurrately reflect the specific types of open spnce uses In the coastal zone, the Coastal Element establishes three s.parntea categories, described below. "122. . i Another overlay has been prepared indicating those areas that are now utilized fcr mobile home parks. {See Figure 10.2) The City's Housing Element states that the City is to encourage the retention of existing, numbers of mobile homesr-�rpeqe-a$Hie-ciA1t4iey-;9-t.0-04O Y the w !41+10 itetisimij, *and investigate areas for potential new mobile home zoning.* 10.4 LAND USE MAPS *PLAN* AND AREA-BY-AREA DISCUSSION Figures 10r - irMd t1se mepS--e e}teFn ert et a-ef-�,-deqeAbed at�e�ra�# In order to Facilitate analysis of the walls *land use plan*, the coastal zone has been divided Into smaller area:; which are discussed separately below. First, existing land uses in each area are described. Then the designations which linve been rntnined in the existing Gleneral Plan are outlined. Finally, areas where "chasiges to the existing plan have been made and the rationale underlying the designation is discussed. Vacnnt parcels are especially important for coastal planning. In most buiit-up places, the character of the nren is nlrendy astabtistied, and changes there will 'occur slowly and incrementally. Significant new development is more likely to occur on vacant land; the land use plan cnn help guide appropriate new uses in those areas. The most important vacant parcels; in each (subarea are identified and analyzed in the text. Ifle"w,eat--•i;-rvel=-}c l-4eee4--4"l4.,Y9 r ��'x-flar`t-f}#-�'#��-�•oastal- e,�-A�i�:ftt--kr-i-: elv�p�-rt-a�fc�sr f;•i;•��ra-++salsa-•�la+�-�!��}�e1ir� " --t�at�-•�t�-•newer:se+t-+��.�}-#raga-tom if+-oti�c - + ltrped-Par+k �F-itlta-ttc+ast�tic --T#i�-e+ tf-else- # - F+eit intw ,- x F�� €-+v#ti1 �r ai+R�een-r+ ifa t�ia ►rai�rx-t l;►�rat ,- t - # a } f � y�es��t�Eir--�r�i--�€•--ar#�ii;i�.-atL�rr+pLa--fin.-+suet-»sot}iflc�t•-gauf�ata�er0-.ire--�i�z itst�*�4^A�lr--lt�s-�te�r-€tt�irt--ts#�lf�tit�t�te�#wf�r-t ,ef1+;- --Pft�ttrttl+�,�+-vr�t#t a-r�ir�cie-�i-apt.toner-L: r- +lk►il�-sail-�c�ati+ac}•�..�ast,�i-A� utaa�+�er�. 10.4.1 HUNTINC1'ON HARBOUR This area inclurfas the City'a coastal Zone between Warner Avenue and the northeastern City limits. (See Figure 4.1.) Existing Uses Huntington 1-47rbour, an AI,Q-ncr+e resldcntinl marina, occupies much of this area. It consists of 1,950 detached single family homes, 1,650 attached condominiums, and n 342-ttnit apartment rornplex, nit oriented around a three-mile network of channels. The Harbour area also nccommodaten three commercial ' centers: i-Iarbour Mall, a. neighborhood center located at Algonquin Street and Davenport Drive: a convenience center at the Intersection of Warner Avenue and, Pacific f:onst Highway; and Peter's Ltinding, n commercial center at Pacific Coast Highwny and Anderson Street. ` "The area along the Hand side of Pacific C'onst Highway north aF Anderson 5trect supports motels, restaurants, and marina-oriented retail a-r service 127. 4 + 1 AND U5E.ACRCAGE SUMMARY 1 TIRGTON HARBOUR AREA ' RESIDENTI Acres Low Density 498 Medium Density 13 High Density 34 F COMMERCIAL Generr.l 27 Visitor-Serving OPEN! SPACE Water 245 Recreati 14 T AL 9 � - � Figure 10.3 128. �' � •' _N.,r.«;i..]..].•+4�+1•• wr.rY.+r.ni-rr•.�.1.r�wM:+t,M1tr 1.�A� . .. .... .rl •. ..Y!•�1.r.. r. ♦i.v....!?r+t....•..,,...ti^S...e+kr.wraSreeilliN.YHw RI"DYY•��4:+Mj•�N�'•'••.!-r \ f LAND USE ACREAGE SUMMARY HUNTINGTON HARBOUR AREA RESIDENTIAL Acres s Law Density 493 Medium Density 79 High Density 34 COMMERCIAL. General 21 altor-Serving IB 's r OPEN SPACE Water 245 .r R-reation 14 � ! TOTAL 909 l Figure 10.3 128. l..r.r - +y�yt�...��arw....,...,w a....++-r�rwrw at+t Y it.{:JiAlw' A,f'Y+aJ'li.l+F...J.•r+T'.f.lw�.+a.rr..+w+r+r+.,.. ...,,........r ' ..�. .r+.4.J` �::«,...f...r.......,.., l•.}ear•.r•'wi«f•n,n�..r.; 4 t ' A. pt44effw�erelei-renter-has-bee r appro-ved43,y4Ae--Geestal Garvv +iaf►ien-#•ec 1~#eeflt�ei►-et--lie--�erfrtinas--o€--E- r�Fe�--flrlj+a*--�;.niertel- ttilr--ol; eeii ergiei-flce{�r-t -aKter s--aloncd-E��a--€r�ler�cl-side-cr f-I�fle�fie--GaasE-l-flc wrap ae���-e€=-grade rimer►--St�etr-apprerclrnot$l••y-,kieF�-a#-�#fiei�--i�-�=:i-�pc�#--vr�t-kr great: v�►�3er�ar-kra-�r�t��s -aad-ser-�e-uac�s. The area also includes one elementary school and nn adjoining neighborhood park site, as wail as a 17-acre undeveloped elementary school/neighborhood park site. Five additional park areas of varying sizes are located throughout the residential area. A fire station, one boat club and one boat and racquet club are also located in this part of the coastal zone. Land Use Designations Huntington Harbour Is almost completely developed with relatively permanent uses. For the most part, these are accurately reflected In the existing•General Flan designations*retained in the coastal plan. However, some changes have been made: 1. The condominiums along Mariner Drive are redesignated frorn medium to• high density residential to reflect the existing intensity of developmunt • of 18.4 units-per gross acre. 2. The Peter's Landing center and the cornmercinl strip extending northward from Anderson Street are redesignated visitor-serving because they both front Pacific Coast Highway, a major accessway for beach-users and other coastal zone visitnrs. res:oeod--; 4sea r 9rive ntere-recfesigraateci--clener�i-ec�:nmereieht4--rijfkt--p�psd vies.-Ifl-AIF-41ase-8er. Gr-"ietincj-ea-pvopeeed-rises-ree+ fe i d"igx R. I The Hnrbnur channels are changed from the general category of open spaca to the specific category, water, to more accurately reflect their actual wary fnr water-oriented recreation activities. 4. Thu Warner Fire: Station site, which includes a public boat ramp, the Huntington Harbour Yacht Club and the-pm4t-a4fneent-t6- ho."Senbrid o i� Pirrk on" Countess Drive Seiler-ee lF+g-ee vter are changed from genera commercial to recreation to show their actual uses. 5. The Huntington Harbour Say and Racquet Club is redesignated from open space to recreation to mor^ accurately reflect actunt uses there. Tib-3 principal vacant property in this area Is 17-acra elementary school/neighborhood park site owned by tlx: Ocean View School District. Currently, the District does not have plans for the site. If the site is sold, the Innd use plan designations would allow It to be developed to low density residential in keeping with tho surrounding uses. Remaining vacant lots in residential areas are also designated the same density as adjacent uses. Development on vacant fats fronting an waterways will be subject to the access policies containcd in this element. 129. .i ft.� :/• '\-i'je ., �f •.4..tYJ 1'.^.L,IIM^•{.51't."J.of MO'+.W..'M.M..rvy��w • k 1 • R . } 4. The vacant strip between the power plant and Pacific Coast Highway is currently Included under the public, quasi-public designation. Presently, the only uqe on this rite is beach-related parking during the summer. It has been redesignated to recreation to accommodate •a recreational vehicle campsite, travel trailer park or other such recreational use. io.4.6 BEACHES AND THE PIER The nine miles of public beach between Warner Avenue and the Santa Ana River encompass approximately 379 acres. The beaches are used for shoreline recrantlun, and facilities on beaches are largely restricted 'to parking lots, restroornu and some concessions. Parts of the Bolan Chica State Beach are used for oil wells and pipelines. The existing General Plan designates the entire beach area open space. The coastal plan redesignates the beaches recreation to more accurately reflect the actual activities that occur on the beach. The Municipal Pier and adjoining raitnurant area designated as mixed devela+ament In the existing General Plea. The Pier functions primarily as a visitor-serving faci.Ity and provides a focal point for the Downtown/Main Street corridor; thus, the Pier and adjoining restaurant have been radr�Bignated visitor-serving commercial. 10.4.7 6AND,WSC--AL-44iRHATI COLDE14WEST STREET TO BEACH BOULEVARD 038WHT-9k r -This part of the coastal nano presents several particularly complex issues which led to a different planning approach for this gran. it Includes the City's Downtown, the future of which has been n center of debates within the F community and the focue of numerous studies, plains and proposals. The Downtown is an older commercial area; many of the structures were built In the 1920's. As this part of the City aged and new population cent ern developed farther Inland, the commercial activities declined. In the 19600, proposals to route a now freeway near Downtown (since .doleted) prompted efforts to redevelop the area. The City envisioned a significant role for Itself In this redevelopment process and its early strategies involved the 'use of a municipal agency to acquire.Downtown properties, consolidate lots and mbuiid the area in' a coordinated manner. Many property owners resisted this approach, feeling that the use of eminent domain was unjustified, After years of controversy, numerous studies and several lawstiits, the City changed its approach in 1976 by adapting an amendment to the General Plan which allowed significant flexibility for new uses In the area. This strategy was intended to encourage private sector efforts to revitalize the Downtown. This part of the coastal zone is increasingly valuable principally because of the burgeoning population in the region and the scarcity of developable coastal land., However, ,many property ownei rs ' are reluctant to engnUa In .now development now for fear that the State and City will forestall such activity until the coastal plan is com' plrta. Thus, to n significant degree, the private ' sector Is waiting for the plan to provide: direction for its development efforts. �= 138. `;?r.i�'iYariy-...,.w......-.......,................._-...•.. .,,_. ... ....r•.. . •. .i..... ,i,... b.. ,.. ,_. .. ., .. ,.'4'211J!�r.w;t...°:.�,:a.:,a+a wa•a•++^».-..., , Planning for this area is complicated by other problems. i"irst, thin part of the coastal zone is characterized by small parcels and highly dispersed ownership, which has inhibited large-scale projects. Secondly, the City's flexibility regarding allowable uses has contributed to a diverse mix of activities - -..'oil extraction, commerce, parkins) lots, residences. Thirdly, the city passed a sei:tmic.safety ordinance which requires all structures to meet certain safety standards in order to better withstand earthquakes. Preliminary studies Indicate that most of the buildings in the Downtown core will need to be torn down and rebtill,t, or reinforced, to meet these safety standards. Superimposed over these factors, the community teas engaged in a long-standing dehate over the appropriate "character" for this area. Some factions argue that the Downtown should rernnin n low-intensity seaside village. Other parties envision the Downtown becoming a regional center with high-rise buildings. Still others want something "in-between," a more intensive urban area but not a regional high-rise, district. The Constal Act adds still another set of considerations to the pinnning process by requiring certain regional and Statewide coastal concerns he included in any plan for the area. +N eonsw-fllan et gem t_i lei loPM ees ►+ it --cr�r�--Ea--+�ee�t--�efr3 c�+ti ►epiA--•try=pt apmFag-44re9 "e4! aE# s . _ hk4-ff Nee+rc estel prigs. 3��se-�►re+►�e-e-rer�ge-e�y�i coning-opt�a�a-Frem-•wi�ieH-EHe-Foeei'-ee+�m►t��t-y-er� E�BP�t, �i1L"+'�t7}'It:'A`�!}tj"$Pt`�1t11t�-'f7t'!.`1LYt�-t`�le4e~t-l'rPec-yrcr:-rTiHN1'G�a4�-B-�911'•'�t1�19���9�i r +n hk4-e +phoeWeo n-c egkle-+rfll�ntr►p#�epe��}-+rx�rli t�waFt g�ie�+ whie,44s-&e fin-_cafe-en-eet4ver4trham-ic t-y�Far f-Ha-f3awt ftrjiltJ4;Rtensit-L- fst ._Avf- --etM9 FflP w- +0w ne44�#ww4e--ft) er wi�#.� ona i--orient at-i�n,--t3et�--E t�os�-epE�t�+e�-a�--ciit+e+as9edr-tea--�r+tist� kind-t►s�-pa Et�rHs-�rtare•-ttse 1-t-ie+tKntf-t#esirtp Fieag�ane#er-lire Gwerol P f%-,-dpedeseribed *In` eeparing the Coastal:;Element, City otnff developed three alternative land use plans for the area-from Goldenwrst Street to1leach Boulevnrd:reflectinq low,.,:moderate,:..'and hi h intensltias �of develo ment. These:: niternatIves attermLed to4provida a ranee of pianninq options .for decision, makers whlle reflectinq both' statewide coastal, prioritier and local 1 community cnncorn& The three alternative plans were;:anal zed bX.staff• in terrns:of their probable Impacts :an existing c evela ment. and character of the area, +trnf circulation, pnrki ,%public works -Infrastructure•, ca acitles,:.,environmental Suallty and Iflscal constraints. The plans a so re►eived extensive public input At meetings and henrinss of the Citizens Advisory .Committee, Planninq Commisslon; and City Council- As a result of this planning and review process, o simile land use plan wasMeroved for the Goldenwest to each-area which Integrates State and local interests and prinrit os. r1efore Me land use plan to cussed, the existing land use patterns and Genernl Plan designntinns are reyiewed.W i39. ��cisting Uses The narrow strip between Goldanwest and Sixth Streets is part of tfie Tawnlot section of . the City which, like much of this area of the coastal zone, Is characterized by small' lots and dispersed ownership. Mtiny of the parcels which front on, Pacific Coast Highway are either vacant ar used for oil proddetlon, while many lots facing Walnut Street are developed . ae ` multi-family residences. A few commercial establishments are also scattered alone} this strip. The area between Sixth and Lnke Streets is often referred to as the Downtown "core." This was at onn time the City's principal commercial renter; now, hawever, It is characterized by smaller scale uses -- surf shops, thrift stores, coffee shops and similar establishments, primarily focused around. Main Street. Land uses become more mixed farther away" from Main Street and Includes :single-family and multi-family residences, oil activities, parking lots and commercial establishments. t r ... ,i t' i• 139-a. t�f bpi it71:Y°aaa.«...}».vrr.r,.:..V.a,l,.-d r•.:'1'.iL,w..i.:.o�" ..,.._ ... ..'.�.,:.. . w •a„i.+.....,,....:_. ., ,.«..r,-,i.«n.•.....»t"ttsr?rse•we.eww...�--. •:�_., f TEF�NATIVE ONE (Law Intensity) LAN SE ACREAGE SUMMARY LAN EST STREET TO BEACH BOULEVARD RESIDENTIAL. Acres Medium Density 2G7 High Density 5 COMMERCIAL General 25 Visitor-Serving 40 I MIXED DE OPMENT 1 ' R e on/Support Commercial 57 3 t I Figure 1U.0 140. ---"•—••....+,+..»..+.+.-...v,.,..........r..wN«a•;,>.t:.,,.:r... 'rxrn.`rtn.,r,.atr.\:,...k+'.:C.•,,. :.::7!•:m:J'iMurX. �r�;;..Yr.•y.Lr.'sC".�l;f:.a::: .,:.u�a:.:w.Rr.+rwira.4ftcwt�n. s �.J } ,f it{G'ti"it' tf • �Y M1Z�, i l ��, J ;5 1 i Ab , IJI� Il ��CI�aA ©II CI 1[7stlCJ[1 ! 1,q Uj,f • w r - en ri fir,•�, �.� �� ' � f i r S f 1 f� .e .. �.4 w.,.i....-.•i�.,r. .'.l•, :,r:,..itu.7`/I7 c+..� .irr.r-wr.—,wr.... eA /14 tr. •�,�'t,i'' lie ,fit.,'; :�.4j,.r'h';,:•�} 14r�1' 1 } ,�•r Sj!f•fir 4� w A{iFI•' i '1�,1Si 'i 1a rr't 4 ':fir{'tI•'6. .-{��'�•�C,',i� i't ,. •�'�T f�1 t � r r t i t.'a + �y. . �.• ].-. to � ��r Ip.�,;:'� At the northern tip of this area is the old Civic Center site, bounded by Orange Avenue, Main, Fifth and Sixth Streets, which will soon be redeveloped into a multi-story senior citizens' residential and activity center. The area inland from Lake Street and Atlanta Avenue is part of the Oldtown section. of the City rind is devoted to a mix of single and multi-family residential uses. A corridor which Is largely vacant is located along the eastern side of Lake Street. Two;: hotels front Pacific Coast Highway between" Lake Street and Beach Boulevard. Inland between Lake Street and Huntington Avenue, the land is largely vacant and used for some oil facilities. The inland area between Huntington Avenue and Beach Boulevard is partly developed as mobile home parks and a golf course, and partly as medium density condominiums. Existing General Flan Designations The existing plan for this part of the coastal zone utilizes a very brood'r'nixed use category which has contributed to Its diverse activities. This desigriatioii now covers almaat all of the "core" area except for,two blocks along Sixth Street. , The two hotels, the vacant all site near Atlantn Avenue and Lake .Street, the mobile home park nearer Beach Boulevard and the golf course also fall under this designation. in thu existing General Plan, the mobile home.park site next to Huntington Avenue is planned high density residential; tho nearby condominiums are j designated medium density; the Townlat area of the coastal zone Is deslgnated r high density residential; and the Oldtown section is medium density residential. ! -all. Ekes--elternc�t#ireean}--o€-Niese4ia►�istir -r#e$ical ins-ifs--et�er�re�-te �i mai e-opeeMe-eetegsele"f ooee-whiek4.�et+emf4eet-Gonstal Act policies. Building Heights The thpoe. larifuse ae� " an which follow '*.'indicate*s" appropriate heights for various, areas. .... its t d be noted the the *three arid* six mW +w�elve story limitations wau d not- necosparily menn that the entire would be built to the designated limit. A specific plan, or other zoning device, would be necessary to include open space, setback and other considerations. A "step down" approach, diminishing heights nearer the ocean may be Oesiredf along with phasing of development. This will be considered in the Implementation phase of the plan. AL-T-GRNA 'W�--NHMBC-R'_NE---1_-ow-Int"sl!Y T4m-€ntertit--of-thla--ol to rntittve--ia-ter--14-i►ointain-a--village--tilrncrsp#�ere--in- gown tewn-l)y-retaIning4W- t"rIe'n atiarr--an44ow4nterwity-ot-deve4opffmm-, esd-- --es ertoe--(tie--eras'$---vieuei--c�ppeerane.�t* -Isr--erpyrrrdi -•cytialing--emc► . 8vffding3 -0 - Er--tw--t�rec---�toriea--hmttld--lte:--eampstiWc�wriE#t-t#ra-- Mega s' pho�EsnE#t��+-�#t�tkeensEl�rer-ESee-�;;uro-��3.�} c4cret+coa-4o--he ht-41m#letioret-4ievo--ttccrt--cle4eteei--€rum--tlre--cl -i Ne+rof- �v hrea-tee-�Nec or�n -�ommiaaicm--s�cox! 1. 4 1 • t .�, 1. ♦•,i 5 '� . �rJ•� ti 5 SiAWN:'_ .S A • I' + t _ f I 1 i * I i S f• r ' Il r apt"i r4�r 1 , IT4 6"It. y9 !i x t � .l �* ` ,.p \�v,•4 ��'t�''y �4��ppd� r�" iu rkY��"n� �•�i� 1�!IE{' ��: , �.1: l'i � ,+ p"' ,t �(+ � •��: �'',." k �,^�•'� .� .� � •ryc�.•, ��f '� (' .��, �. �l'�t� 1 r''4'�t jk`}3 t��i' � �l• � +�' 1 x,�+ ti � } {'� �, }1,'i� � tLy�� � ► k � '1{'i i. }! � i � t , ;� •�� r�3' �Y'��i {t+� 1 � J � \� i,�{ ?�F�f i XA .� � '. !•: it � 1 � .�t� t � \ , ,1 I yl1.. y !r L' �� �'14 �'. � S 1 1+,� i ,+ ,���� . `I •�, r a�� i .�• ,t.i. 3�` ���t � �J�. tr y � " .� 411 �,`�,}" ��y�+ '.{F, ��'•�1� ti ��,. tt} 1 �, ) l } r �. � � , !�, ' I��� ,,� i ` tt ,� Y � t r^'�t\y�i 1.- y . L'I "� t � R�� � 1.. `1 \ it1„ •} � �{ �:i;^ 1�,j, �;;.� ., j v } •j�+. - i. � .,� '�y , ,k, �r #i T '' .Ni`I �,' �, �, > r; �/ �A� .�r ��. .fit';• ' �t .�C 4.;� t � ,. , t '1 �yt>,'r? , `' �*,y�iiT�9 a �1t . *+�Yty, N'#1` F.k '' tN ,t� }` +r`� ��,,�, r_.y+ kst ��� �a„� t�i, �p�,) . .,{?�• rj�H ;r ,� , ��'+ �F '�, ��. N��, rF� f.'t5+•:�`i�A � � ,t li� t � �" � �/l�L1"F�\ \ly �� 1� ` , � ..`t�. �'' `{i �4�M. T'''i s 5 K t$; i S'�+5.�I�,!h,.�}'b. ��' ,.\ �'\ � �;� t'{ilS ,�; }'��,.�,';��.•� {�tr t1°' � `t{'�l `F . �,y Yt��y'�..,� 17'� �1 Q' i ' tt 51 '",ti� r .t`' \.� ,�.� } .t. •i� .F. i �.1. +'��{1 ti 1�`+`l��! '�' �,,>.� •t:M 1+�.. C , tF , 1. 7� S� a 1'. 1 9'a��a j1`.t ♦�1�� ����� (� {. ;,� .� � �*,�.{� 1:� 'gin i Y,,, ;fit`;,�d r L � ��! ,Z 1�t1'{ 1,�. '� t• t,�. # i � rq y� �ltr t�t3 �+ �y`r � '� � �'�.� •�j'�1� ''F �I k 'e��: � +� t ft �,'�� �Y"1p �v�i• 'r �' �� �i� ;�� #rh;�.,, 4��x 1���` a,' �� ti . t �` �1 k � ;y�!, 1 '1 1 �i,1t Y�y a t `� 3i,�Y 4•f�. , .��� tyy�y. � �1ti t+y1 't +{�•7} '". {k'«'tl .�t,Ca:1`• +`i1:!.{.. �-� ti':1 1 '\i• 'i t ,. r 1 � t � 1 ; r �I r,. tYa �. f .v,. ,1.1,. '.,1{ t h �• 1"� S T' Z 1•S. y'„ 1 � +. •.1(lt' t`,tii. f.•' f.lra't10 M'+1 f •'t"i.i'. � � �t 4f. ��,,,•1 �: 7. >Mk}.,{� ,;t: t�♦f 1+t. :t.t t. ..; t±ti.t.;ir.`L. 'i,4! r 3 M1 �i n 11 1.'. F, V � ! ...M1. i nt';. i , �.� �+ t. ;<Ks:', ,- sty, �`+4 List ► '3:, �� v`� � •�+ti ,, �} '`, � +��y ::fit '� #�'�AM i � �� �?l{ ' � fyrl�' t,chi �' t ��e� • � t� � ��1 r � '' � t' � �',y , "�1 r �� k `J � '7, � t�i 1 �� � `9`�r�� ti� t� n '�� �,�,f�' �� #� .�•_ ,� , �1� �e 777� '� ,� 1�� M�r � j y, t.. �,i.,' S =� �•T 'r't 4' � �' "�.�, { .r•t 4� ':�� +. A. "i y. l� R i"+�, 11' • k5 !.tl>.t A,s`#+ k �'� >: •11.. '����+a '}t If '1 tii 1.1�?; 1'��► M1 � �� .•�� .` �7 v f r'!�� •!F �� ',�' ��'ti,�l:i.�'� k�j,,s A i �''� '�' c, ,1 ��;?���l��,1«. � +it '` j �'/_t s► ��' �•t ���+ =,1,�' ���j�i `��+, 1 rT �( �� .1� .� �}�, ,�..�� T ' .�. tt. �� t .��•'y r l �t! � �rL �� �`�}r ,,'il.t ��,'� ��"' 1 �+�� ��, �� , /L �� `��, ){,l�ff, r {` 'a tir. -y.��1,w1 +�'.1��°•�,. � �,rt � t� ��t��`S� + � �� � �:} � � ���ra i t�h 1� ��`� ''P �� � '2,�' � � �J ��t f 4�� �r 4;"'t�rtl�t '�'!+�7 *�w4, �� ¢• � '' ��' � ,1 ��� i +�� . ,`'��p f�M1 �+`� yt' M1I 'i 'q 4 .•} 1 i r 31�1 tA SY � � � 43��,���a�;• a �':it�sAa kx , . f• 4 ' ' t y. { t I he Downt-ovin core area is designated general commercial to accommodat u, s oriented towards serving the needs of the local cnmmunity. Some f the uses, such n, restaurants, shops and drugstores could also be expect to serve eachgoers and visitors to the coastal zone. '! The first lock north of Pacific Coast Highway between Sixth and La a Streets is designat visitor-serving commercial as is the Municipal Pier a d adjoining E. restaurant. hose areas are ideally located to serve visitors t the popular City beach. dditionai visitor-serving commercial areas re designated outside the cen al Downtown core to meet the Coastal ct emphasis on , providing adequat visitor-serving facilities. I A two-block visitor rving commercial node is design ed at Pacific Coast 1 Highway and Goldenwe Street, and a three-black de is designated .along Pacific Coast Fligtiway tween Thirteenth and. T th Streets. The desired development f or this seco node is a hotel/mot and restaurant complex. , Another visitor-serving 'corn erciai node, appro mately 9.0 acres in size,is designated at Pacific Coast I hwny just soot of Lake Street. These nodes i are Intended to provide visitor erving foci ' ies 'for beach-users at various points along the shoreline while voiding continuous strip of commercial , development. ' Approximately Gt] acres fronting Pac Coast Highway between Huntington Avenue and Beach Boulevard is sign fed recreation/support commercial becausa of its proximity to the he h and t tw,2 major coastal access rnutes.- Pacific Coast Highway and Bea Boulevar . Such uses already exist on the site, including a hotel. with convention fa ilities and small shops, two restaurants, and a golf cnurse In the future, up olive acres of this site may be used by the City for a 1 and moderate incom housing project should the opportunity arise to spans or participate in such a velopment. The remaining areas, comprising a total of 252 acre between Goldenwest w Street and Beach Do— evnrd, are reserved for residential es. The majority of this acreage' (241 acres) -is . designated medium 'density' esidentlal . in the following locatio s:, 1) the. first block fronting Pacific Coast ighway between Twenty-first a Thirteenth Streets and between Tenth and th Streets;.2) ' two blocks ' nn ediately northeast of the , Downtown -•omm cial center bounded by 1lalnut Avenue, Fifth Street, Orange, Avenue and Six t Street; 3) four blo s Immediately southwest of the Downtown commerce I center bounde y. Walnut Avenue, Lake Street, and Third Street; 4) one blo north of Fr kfort Avenue to Palm Avenue betwr!nn I�iain and lake Streets; nd .S} the ntire area east of Lake Street to -©each Boulevard (excluding the .� VIA or-serving commercial and recreation/support commercial ar s eviously discussed). I: f � i43. ..4X•-7L'.1���. • I f 1. I r iY S t� �1rS40sE tiiW[G71' .�YtAIi � u t �; i t mtraR tt'"7�(tTSr,ysgy 1 1 t't 't 1 I '.R�,t.—,•r i�, 4� Y�o�'a'�o• i, 511'k' Y A, i r i 1 .ti ]'.�iYv J �(,,t•,q, .i �� a'��'• �:s y -f�ys;�.� ,�..� ',•►;f�t. � `�`:Itl�,r�'` t��b;�h .t {�g,���.:;� f: 1 � �vv�.•s�.�.,:";� ;t;��.rxt'�.,��`sil��; r"�3t• •r rd j4. !,.j 4n �"r :yytl, � �Z.. ,� ,, �h �((t.Y r f.� j� A ijl�. .��r�,�.x .4�1t ��C'";t:� ���:� �,'�i��.'��i�'„ � C.. d � �• ��i,f,4�:�5� �y�r'�• °ijl' h;s;.t��� :1 ;ti{��tt• ��! p tfy �� xt4 A `a 'Y,7• `«YSWaq;. ,r.f w:Y" j �' •t �. i�y^{4 i f �+(.7 ,q R'i.}i4 .r},,. 'S3 V' x, (�;; 't�} Y� � fi ra;tr. .iy. ��r�• .`l v�,( � �i } '�','s bL��•.� rAs, �., 1 r i s «�],,' ,SiyS ,4f .y �3 �t e jY.e. �,,(r; ,e e t;;�++,, IY°,il`"y�% i+ '�y',, . r°► ;,- .'�{ �'a �r. 1 �I 1� .1 i h � 1 1 �"'^�.,','t,T('{�� �'�!F �,r� ,,�•.� ktr'+t rl ;,i• IS '�,+r �� !' '�F.'i�t� 'i i�;�t � � �` �tY f.� '1• �`I� �, '� qa, i S"�1 L.iF �Grf.�. e M � .� !� �F, ••�'�N ��y u�"� Y.I , � �j�,"''tt :Y 1,�1�� ry w S+> �i11 �' � �1' a 11., p �'� >r� 3 'erq, w�+ .�i�;L �+(' 'Sy4� .uxf!�.��`�.�tr� 3r'rN .�1�4v'!•� � .eS.'�,^��;' 4�.�»,l :kT� �'`�"!�(`�t�c'�u� .�4 rr�4} ���'r��r. �`�1=�� ►��.,... �i�,i��'^i.�t� �t.`f ���:�(�; t. i3Q,�,`j'� � ''N ; 'xfi 3a{j�i �f 1r�, � V�.,'�y��/ "'1� � l[Et�,.� -`�.J �t74y; ,t �'r:sr � �' r, �y .�.r�,t, ,r:, k;,,. �.T•"["ijf • �{ {r� V•� �+ t,, 1• �; ' { � t ]� C,.. 1. �. ;:ss � �` *rh �!,�� ' � r` ;�+ .t ,�C'¢ ,. d"f3 . 'J�vY�,{. ,. � ,�'�� {t � l� It��' ci}Y� • 1`i �''o �;�}'� �i sf.' e' ''f" 2 � `@ 3 ` �" fff ,;,t RR � � .t! �:�' t l� ��.fiirakn�.ISSYk�s�}�Y��1�✓.vi� x,�.�7!�t ��~i*1 �!"S� y. r .!a. Ye +�.,.'��'�+StY?i�I�i.�Lw{����:,� ` �If l�'c�r tY`�;.4�cii'kia rtXils..rr<tY! f•.i, �A (High IntensItY) EET T• � • • r L ARD Acres RESQENTIAL 140 High [)ensltY •WERCIAL 13. r G.-neral 44 �t M,IkED 1 MENT 57 arcial Recrentl uppartCOMM 35 Officasidential t, aJ .. TAL ,;� ry xl�, vVit � t�? )�i►�re'z�tr' e ,� •;jNrr�� '��r'j i t�usssi��+��'�r S ,rMA h 3''y�"ti4,�4f' ,.i�5se ��Z�j33' •� q.�wY" trl� h � �t.�t�'t'' t 7 ,u ;�:;,o>�Jx t.F..,�tt!'t1 t:�'".�•'tt, '��i� . t( � t ,.A '�� ii�v ' 1,�"ll,Y, ��: r (t ' �t��i'.hlA `'+'!Sl'Y�.f�R jr� ��•�i+'Rti�i. � i ,� �qy,'��y. yii�fl .�,tiS e<h �iZ ��; :¢ '`� �^ �` ��t °'• ' �`�. �, ,• #. t +> "� 1 `}•.�'��.r ��,��f,1{J= ns ,�y�t'�a S ,t�t�` i�§y��''�; S.l ��� , �'''�' � K" E' �' 1•{ � V� �i; ia'S �'4 "} +7 ] �1 I' t113 t(4, 1jffii t s t �# �p�'�''�6",t�^Y,� `' � (�i� �� r y,�� �" '��t,���j .�t+,,��ti��• �, {��•i,2r�1�:r� � t i � 1 '1+� 1:.�' I ''(j �� �• ,e A �� �;. i�i•��ut�'� � ;t �r.► ,j"��?' '�...� T� .,� '� ,"•• 1 ��'� � �fC �i�, �i ' w' ,', �, •�Y3 � a� �',� � ,�� �y ,� 1, ,E� �j i y •r1 y f f 4,1, , t t �1. Ll { 4A$�+ii�` 1 + (4 1�1j ! i1 •, 4 '�, t�,t `�,'"'y. `� - �� T ' ya1b� 4 7aS1• 'i ��"Y i31� �l.l.1 7 �'\ - 74 ,lk ..1� ryp,. �''' 4I.�•�} 'Z. !+ .1 � ,; 'y t'`lb���i.t )� r., t j.\'C. #"+"i '� A, h ,,� V� t '�{1�,,;y1� "��.•�l! ,,'��+, t�! i���ff�.� tt ��� �� � �. e � '` ��,, ���iy►,�. �� 'it��n{�t. jE'�,j, ..�y�� �� r ��x.• .�.� 1�� 'f�'..!� �`� ';� r�»• ..1�lr`��'.� �.��, 1. `E �.`(t p. .,, �7 �`t ♦� � �n rr ,'gyp �jy� � �{«S� '�� • to �.� + � ` i �, �� 3,t t. �.1. � ,� p it �'e �Y /,�,t'. '! /{ i1 �`�,r�• rt�]�1 �,�+�i.y,�' `�ltrx�i`.�. � `�� + 1�, ' t}!{f�� `, �{t�t� �'�., ����4 t 't`�g4i�4�1 `� �' .� e`ll�j1.~yy� t �� � t'� t�`P• R iit fry �� � S�k7• , f ,'�� �'�. .� •�'���' = 11,"�tF�. ] �� :S{��y, �� +, it }f `' rr. ��j�,�,L r �{ �hrr.•4�*t, 1{Yj'. }j � � f R: �. �1 .�' , tr.. t � ��c ' .�F � a�t'4� "q'{{yy�,, t�{ {'� °��`��'� il� y'h i'�.'�7,�`h��t��.. � , � r�.:t1`,.r -{1► :h.rt ��t R • ,rr. 1f �:" '. ,tip' •l..+a, .ski 1 a Yj! IR In t f '�,� •kl , t2:ts V ,�� t �'��:i�may_•.i?'ti;i ��2'j�r�{C,l '�'�� ��`�, ►mott �` � •�, jj'��}, t y, +� �., + ; d� {!'� "� ~ t St t � F2 !J 1 f .n v �1+" T�'� t►a''S,Y 1�.'�' t•��.��'+ �, i ttP'• � ? ] :i r 1 �'�' ,��`T,,��. � � �l'.r �' KI 4 � �72i� -T�r„���,, �1'��` y� :� �• 2 �i 'k��}C�`} f!'{ �'y�t"�i'�,"�� f r��S { �, }�f.��+ vl+ �y+: ',r d +�, P i � q,. �, t 1 j �• f'°r` ,` L r !'' tR�� �► .�j � .�. f IA ��1.1-47;'.�,� .pr.,r . �+ +r� y Y,i r { �' � � '. ��p�'ft� ''t,+t. � �►� ��1 1' q�,,' �• .f ,`W���` . � �1' �� � �,it � t �w 't� " �r t s. � ,,t l�� r`S 1 '' ,�: :, .�� ;fit ! u , t 4Y .Y+ . �� �� �% f ,s!' �r. .'`�.. , 15 t .�j '., Y �. � f• ' �� � �+ls�Yf,i ,k. '�`�!'r t' `' 4•.� 1�n�� .{, !�' � � � } �'�'�� � 4` � `'�'�k}�+ ���� �41�: ' �t� � �� � �il,i� 1 A � �. t•��� ,�" .+ �/S •y+�`�>w�,�0 r� �• : '.�; �� �f.`� ,14 r ti�� �r��`i ��i'"Y�'���'t 4�t,� ����� �+i�{ �x'Ss; .47 ,�,� �,, + il,�f _ .fit` �. � ., , "• ,•'�j, ! ,a ., '�'�{ s �y'�� � r�.1 �'� -� :it1YA' �"''.i,!1'41`} 1 i i +. r ,Au�� L:`��„i d�:' t ti {� rs ►I/�� / � � � fit}"��, � y y. � �1. � � � '2'1, f F. •'i .� /' >♦�''4})1 , p S +'+ :S`4 l�4 1 . ' h to � +. �{ ! {,r>, �, '�'� :.T'� 1+ � � �1, y{�, }d �1 t, ,4.'�,+'Kt iC "� 'f '{ T c 7 ytf„ t! • U ht#r� vl'Y T'�}��,{(� ;"�� ',�r ,v i + . ,li i+l'!. +tf.'JYkki: In! 'tt ,,t , �;",,4y1;•- LTERNATIVE NUMBER TWO - Mtedium intensity The ntent of this .71ternative is to create a new urban character for this ren of th City.and restore ecan". 1c vitality to Main Street and the Qo o town core.. �pitalizing on the popularity of the City and State beat -a and Municip Pier to attract a visitor market. Buildings of up to six st les with approprict ' setback and open space requirements would be allow d in mast parts of the owntown core. A T-shape are fronting Pacific Coast Highway (approximat y 30 acres) .is designated vial r-serving commercial. It is anticip ad that this concentration of u s will capture a share of the large coast tourist market. Although the princip I use in this :area is intended be visitor serving, professional offices w 1 be conditionally allowed,. locate In the same buildings in order to ere n a Downtown urban a6t vi center In this area.-In this,event, the ground .fl r must still be usedYO-thirds permitted visitor-serving commercial uses and in no se will more than' of any. building be allowed . for offices. ditional vlsita�✓serving commercial artd ; recreation/support commetcia areas are d signated outside the central Downtown care at the some locate s as In th first alternative. A`.tour-block area east of tive visit r-se ing commercial core is d6nl4nated ; office/residential with a height li of approxim,6faly six staries. The compatibility .of .afflce/professional s with resident.al uses In. an urban i setting,Items from the. following: II of 'ce buildings can have :.similar bulk '- and appearance . to apartments . h col for-Iniums; 2) .traffic , generation (especially truck traffic and deli cries) and also impacts from both types of uses are relatively low; and 3kilnimizes lk.+. weekday, iaylight hours} of operation,'for ; most professional businesses Impact an nearby residential units. Additionally, this office/resiylentiol district will s ve as a buffer between'the Intense 6NImmercial activit'6s In'the core area and is residential areas further , east. The area i:ounded by range Avenue, Lake Street, Fran art Avenue and Fifth i Street Is designated general commercial In' artier to erve the needs of ; adjacent residential areas Including the proposed senior citiz s complex. The remnlning yeas, comprising a total of 230 acres bete en 'Goldenwest Street and Be ch Boulevards nre reserved for resf.dentlat uses. he .first block fronting Pa (ic Coast Highway between Twenty-first and Thirt nth Streets and betwe n Tenth and Sixth Streets is designated high density esidential, ` with bull ng heights of up to three stories. A hi density residential (ksignation is .applied to the old Civic Centr. site, refl ting the density of ttx: proposed senior citizens' complex. tmini-di, ely } so hr.-ast of this site, the area between Walnut and Ornnge Avenues north of alley Is designated high density residential to reflect existing land uses. i DELETED 1, 145. N§ r 3 � ; .3 L., , .. .... ._.. .... ..........»-........� .. .M. . .. + ..,, ... .. ...,..'.l. , .. .. . +a•.. . . .aY ...,... . + . . .•wi+ylai:. .,an..'+`.. !K.E Mfti.�'+".."" ' i 5! 1 {t hh lT .� t y VVrr c yy rA �• 7y, �'�sd►►'. ��I�tt � t �ti�;C.i�f �`�u'�» S��l,�'r�w�"`�. tT� tl�. � t a• jY�s.ii l'�'2�t`'ft��Jt7�:37itTr"t� � a � ��� x �. tirsfit rSZlmtJi. 'r'�"# tiSt; f;"�tin +j'}"�iN �r a',MttTt'l4s? .4. 3�1 ,i ^ t 7 +ti iP` s, a v ��t T�.. Alt. {/ SC ,•'v" i ti i.))� �'t i'� �" t ,�� t• �� ��� E7,3i' .a ��� ��ati :� Hls� •}a•f ,�,�.'' ".fit` �?'*, •,fr .. `q. M s A; �z• ++�' � �: y*r1:•�,� t r+ � tK,��,\}.�, w:,� �w'� .,5;� '� ��,(1 ."�.. K.�� �•����., n s: •,�z.��,� `tiiTi,�•�,5., N.z,t�j :J�� ���:ti� t ��.•. {C��:�a .�;,� �;�� ;�. y��,, "" j' �,;+� � { i 4 }+,�E'3 r, �3b, ,.y •��� � i , �a,' ;�, � �;�"� �"4 te,�,t���l.,1t tI •,�s����� \ i_�i { �'�..k ', .rs, � A�' � � � V., �� '+•�,�,. t+rr.Y .ly+ a�b .� � z"'n� j�t l,S,' ��to t; .Y;'r!7: �,a,f �f't. � a, k��.�t�� \�.p .;ay".y�'r� '+�'�.-�ti Y;i£�.,� '� f: f G .j t4 r,s`:�.`:�, t'-�llv�k}xi�13i$Yt'�a�f(\t�X.rf"kiiiT,Y.'!� � '9�`� �y�•4� \ ��t�" i � 1-�a. t• �� f"�' " .;S'�-�,''�! d• 'g� � �i hG-acre nrea bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Delaware Street an A ante Avenue is also cir'sJr�nntad high density nor! a medium dens' y rest title) de^ignation is applled, to 7pproximately 140 acres concentr ed betw n Lake Street and Beach Boulevard. Thase r 'idential designations are intended to reflect existing land ses and assure co patibility with adjacent residences. It is anticipated that the concentrati of people in these areas will provide a local me et for the Downtown ge pral commercial core. ALTERNATIVE UMBER THREE - High intensity i The intent of this a ernative is to create a mixture of rest ential and.financial uses .within an urban ore, capitalizing an coastal arneni testa draw residents K and businesses into the area. The option of establishing ownt own,strictly as a commercial center vial, roposed and rejected for t following reasons: t) rJ The.Downtown does not h ve a 360 degree market . en; 2) the location is far from any frcevrny., and 3) st 11 high Intensity cum_. rLial uses would generate a large amount of traffic whict the existing circul Jon system most likely could ' not accommodate. Instead, a six of'rsaidentln and office professional uses Is proposed to create a viable, high 'ntensity urba center. The intense nature of;this concept enc6dr ges high rise structures, especially In the care arcs. The Downtown'is r ati ely small, however, and development there must be compatible with the ratter of 'the entire City. Thus; the ,. Implementation of this alternative uld require controls which ensure scthacks and open space to protef,t v ws, Iprovlcie adequate. parking and circulation, and- prevent one or va str tures from Capturing the entire market potential of the nrea. . his altern. ire envisions- buildings of up to twelve stories to create tl�e der' ed urban atm sphere and maintain a cohesive Downtown. ; A designation of offir:e/r identle'l Is applied to. the .35 neres boi,nded by Walnut Avenue;, Lnke Str t, Sixth Street nr►d Pecani�d Orange Avenues. The compatibility of reside ial end office uses in nn Or an setting is .addressed previously'!n`the.seco d 7lternative. Limited ancillary etail comrnerciai and service , uses :3ra.. nditiunnily allowed in this de.sir ration and 'will be encouraged to Iota on the ground floor of lots fronting Mat Street. The hiutt demon for housing in the Southern CaIifornin region hOuld stimulate the rapid do elnpment of residential units in the Downt vn area. As rasidentlal velopment intensifies, It Is expected to st ulate new office/prof ssional uses. This mix la the key to creating nn urban tmosphere /visi n. rving commercial riesignntion is applied to the first block . nting st Highway between Tenth and Lake Streets and to the Mun )paljoining restaurant. Building heights of up to three stories woul be In this visitor commercial arch inland of Pacific Coast Highwny 'nserve views from Inland structures. r ' NLETED 146. py r . i. ' T 1 a .1�. 4 M�'11 1 �' R� �� � . :,� /� 1 7(/ T � / .l t .��.tM. 'y+ c 'itt �� ,u• l i.S 1. a 4 Fa .ry°rHOW ' Y ! • • • 1 1 • • f .r.- 3j f ! ! • ,4.,. •s i- s R• • S • • 1 1 • f Y.: ,�. • � t S • t • S 1 t�•" L R • t s • ' • • i i } r .Y , r + 4 ` troy.is ,� •`yryyP,11�� ti1„ Y y It ol �"�•nrt�aelYrq+S'� '�[ itikkkt sit �\+�r �,�! �P j;� gL]1f}, �j1 j . '� '� �. 1,�,(•1r3,,y���•'�}" 4Lr ,+ 7 •Y'�j ) r i•I't ,. 7y y't �y��t �y y �1 �}•« "�.[ '/:'���;}Z��;��`� 'n •��{�t� ,r� ,rJ,'�-'Ay"3Y!�t a�YY "�,+�� ��,��r';?�,���l�{A�,'���M: ��h��2y��`�i�`y1,lAS,�'�'�"��'�t'}. 'rlr tY��;!t,f �It i��. 1�{tv4�ft to} •!•i�'I^ � x.�TM.,�' �'J �'���6 ���fLL33�.y�,��15 �`�..� �,��t�,�y ^1r .� �tj1i t '► 1 ��.��V r �j, t1 1T 1�1�'*��t.�� �• "�f�," �� �����" :�i:. Y�I�s�� .d�;�t i i'��` •11'! .r '�•�t�t ��"''i�� !`Z+}' ��li ' �t��� t e,e �'S i1F��1 •'t •�,�'t'1 `!t'� �' t �'1 1' .�e! }��`x� ti�'�'`,^• i"'�Z �`��� '� , t�, �' i ����, h �+ '��� �,�• . r ,+ �)., , 1�t, �� �'J. t11+. `,�+� a `� �� .M�;� !1 � fi.�% � �`,�V'�f '�,yf" <. ;��t, �+..,�1( � i"j� .�.t�,e .�"� /, }�`�,��� t, ��'.l i ! J�if 4 7 •7 ' } , r Y d, .�, r4, - t, ,t A ; i t. t }7,, (' e .'ri 3 L'y` 17 !. � .�1 � +;�y,a ��� e'y�t'''f �' tx:� '��' it t� �" '\ r '�+ � )` �� • 1'fY a Jy�+), �(r:• � �f :���! {" t� �A' t��T �; �1` N • � L �'fi } •,. ., ,f � .. 4`�` �,..[.�. [� M, , ��,�1 ,T�t�},ti'i��•,� t. ',l�Y� ,�` `, t �, Y�1' , '�; �..14� z�. s, � .[� ��� Wf i T� �'�, ttt. �% �# � ; � �1 �'l� t'f1� :�.Z e: �� p ` x y' t.�{��: i G , y�•,ttf'• ���: . ilk III rat r �� �'� �`� ,' � � �� �� .,� � ► � i � ����, � �� 4• ��� } fit � ry❑p,f :� ,� 1 .a j ,•� � , '�.. ,{ 1 y 'A 1 3 I Llul �,1 ( 1' t, fy1�.� r',t , �', t. • �, j[ly,+}x' ,T j!�� �1 t,�} ,•L� `y�� \}•1��� i"� i `.} t. �Y�DD•�r'� � �}� .ry..'Q([,� � .��� �., � � �, If i` � .;t��!#j� L f� il( * 'I •a�t y �1 1 i� � � i� '�• ,!�}�S} .�(j�. �7t�'� 'S�f' 1 y � t � + �i �� 1M1t , r!YI 1 '��'�'Y' i•L T� ti offill, r." 1 r* tit t ;�, ; t •F :�si. 1�a ' S'#fir'a,'Y-j1["q1>!, , ., iY t.' ,i�1i•311" 1. , { ! 1 to c?C '��i'�t1,n 'i7.' .e '?!t`�` +tt3""�t/44 t.Y- '4"e.•t{t 4/�V' !e T t.'t`�i'4t4 � d0"-i+,I ,y•. 1'!'i ''� ,R � ' t+ . ,� � , f ► � , Est � 4 •� Y Ttl ._e4. .'t t .. SS �s., �.�"� r. 'l A�1 f t _ .s�'1\. � .•� �Iio-.�3+ l ^.:2i+ ..•r P,I.1. 'f•+.e S ��r•.; Fr., aY�rY� �' ri"►����`�n �, *LAND USE DESIGNATIONS a:iftr{d),a iy `':? rfifyt ob^' d✓' dt�.ik . { * •,� 4. Ttialan�duse55plan:.for the.Areafrom,Gcidenwest:.Street toQeach8aulevacdts escr e alit:three sections,-- a enweF treeF to MRS 5treet',,sixth'Streetito a a7, treet;,an ,Eake Streit to HedcWaoulevarl Were 'appropriate, more s ec c m ementat on concerns tb u n e tc, parktnq treatment, etc, are discussed. GOLDENWEST STREET TO SIXTH STREET 2��r ' ^�'. �\ tiii�.�L .�W •�' +a� r '.4S`a:+�A sir "x ',.A�, .., :,1 This area; is scam risedof,]7btacks aian the,inland: side:of, I?ac f!c Coast, wa . eAent rest : rasa;.acre-i area 4:was rev ous , es nate ens ty<,res enL a , ntt e�General Plan, howeveri�the,lots,f acing ac c: aast Rqhway...are:commercial azane 77,Devel opment 1i % area has hgen con ne 1 muc a the oceanrmar y:° o , highway frontage remaining vacant. A Wa meanawof sea F591591 ndA1F61i';`str1R1 commercial de el o M'eMhnt*e1*onq.,1' ac cs -oast:Highway*t eacoaste -:I and;use,e ana designatoaxt the}ma or t &o ,;, t erearearastores ent a *.w t :vtwo 'nodes!10 via I tar-serving ,,.commercial . eve o man -r ah wa- ac areas otween Golae9west.,ana;< wen - rs Streets .-and t a;i,three-black i area i Between TentE an rteent treeta. Ahese. two nodes �'.were,:,selected#t o A concentrate cornin-erclo-I develoement at gecific Mat ions and reflect existing uses. 5` r r ..medium iniGt4 w�� -hv7.' n,,•� �HtT�a�t}rtmstnin �ba �alonqPac CoasT es fes Vea ,res ent n w t : o •,t rewstories.�;,. t nt aarea'j me um ens t ' o.base, ens t xa u ro "•;` ,. wassume pw t ncreases•u tta a�max mum ' o units ertacre:4orri:nk u .,�;consol laatea,,b1 oc . :� eve opment�o e residential 4 bloc si stm. nten a ,,to.; ere a ate : a s ec a an,, which, WiIT specify park ng;,,pen,apsent, an •setback requirements and variable lot area ratios to encourage property consolidation. SIXTH STREET.TO LAKE'STREET • :,,,f+ :. � f° �' iM,1; " ' " �.�ry1 1`ki •' iY.9.'. -. .., :>� t�. f, a Dttenreterredloashe�Dawntanxnr aorstarea, ,thlon af.�thsticoast0l` 'zones etween; xt fan •a e.. treets s%t the oca o ��t- o .t eu an .uses an: because 1 o Mis�ox st n '.m xturetn ;curnmorc a ,,and residential!usest commun t ate, an relationshle,to Ahe,Fier and eac __WitHin o area, _ , caas a 'zone 'exten n an to Hartford venue, encompassinga tote of 69.7 gross acres. T1io coastal r land tise lan deaf nates..Ihe`-fIve�bi66ke ,fac16 poc fie Coast wa . acresY for,,v s tar-sere n commercial uses.tw capltalize an t e r visibility. -frorn t e _ g way, an ;re at ons p to_the- _er. area, which. s a so deaf natsd :0s via or-sery n Many of, the existing businesses 16catea in e `first block area are visit r-orlented, and this Is an importnnt area v sus n projectingan Iffiage o e Downtown area. yyn-•wv. ..�., .rwsa.. ... i i.. i' ; a`• ,. :' .., S(ii4 ?.'..t:::•:Ln r JW 3 MCI! 1 y r t � i ��� t � , { � �, � � ;• 1, �� f• 4 1` 4 Y, t '`, '���11, f,(e'■(yly + �,� .r { , � AI ,'y,�( � t. � .y:' �_l. . i ➢ '�E i _s.VlY _ •- _ .. � i. tIR �� >`��X ♦. V u�L11"4 �. a' LIKI 'a: r • ' Er;�. 7:Y .•.;sir=. inlAnd af��tlie` i�st' block:area,' the land:use Ian Masi nates�I2 blocks', acres ort A'm xture=.o o ce an re col a =uses. , s:.area, currently characterized b afficecand commercial uses oriented ta•Main:Street3with>thc: out in ,:areas tawar xt and Lnke' Streetspre ominant y�residential. =° he office residential desi nation is intended to encoura e:',the? reservation4of Main,µ Street as, a . business.�:corrl err, yet .}Allow :attract ye �mixed.':use ge—Glopmentsi;wlth amid-rise-.-offiees�or condominiums of fardl2q r oceaw.views. e:ays 1 tyeaf:.F Rt and Lake Streets and Oranqe..and t ante° ve-nues�for cirryinqspr acted increases ln:itrnffic also-'suRports.the configuration of:the offfee/residential:area. To,furt er.'the mixed use cone :o t and ecausef.'the unifying mature of the Main Street semi-mall -Improvements, visitor-serving { uses would also be allowed:tn locate in the:office residential area subject to approval of a cunditionu—e permit. J}t. F...� IY++�+:,. -..:. :C �. ^... .. II �'J v.A. -n. � .rt . Northof. [Iran a Avenue; the..5.4 Acre former. Civic. Ceriter'!site' lins boon desi noted:as high densit ..residential,,to reflect the pr osed.157-unit senior clti4ans1iousinq and,recreational complex. -T a remaining three,blocks'7within the.SNWt to Lake Street wen, X tneres) havekbeen.desi natedr.for;general commercial uses. : This%nrea ..Is' oriented.to Fifth,..MaIWand Lake:-*Streets, rime .� rouEe-s 'of 'travel, { and VA,IsxYIntende �.Ao' reserve . A neighborhood commereiat.'area In,close,proximitx,ta,.the seniors'.housing.,,The-location of •nei hboMood commercial uses n this.arewis niso.intended tobuffer.tho'senior citizen project from more intense developmeR in the office rest entini urea. At•six-sue eicilit 'limit'kris Geen applied 'ta` the entire Sixth to Lnkc.Street nrewas o,meons of-encouraging consolidation,and recycling of existin 'uses, as wall as ,'ellnwin thepossibility fnr vertical. mixed uses within individual r developments and providing opportunity for acenn views. LAKE STREET TO BEACH 13011LEVARD . 1 This • are :enco asses • a , roxh»nt''e,1 260 ncres,.•:,aextendiri� ' intAnri: ':to ndinn- n of Avenue: at one poinL AThe 90-acre aren north of:Atlanta'Avenueiis Olmost."coTeletely devel2evd,�wltfi a'- mixture of singe family nnif small rnultl4amii uses. -The overnll ensity s area falls into the .medium density range; therefore- the, entire area north of Atlanta Avenue has been designated as medium dens ty residential. Theo.acaa+south df{rAEl64 ",Avenue`,encamonssic� ;atotal :area of�lb2 ncraa, consist In ..,of..existIng -, ma ile home: F:rks, hntals. a olf:. c urae':,A- new con om n um: evsj e�menti, and a large vncont uren 'with oil production.. The coastal. land use , plan designates nearly 90 acres of this area for me ium densltY resident Ijal uses. A roiiimatel 1D acres of the nren scwth of Atlanta�Avenua an'the"east aide of Lake Street fins been doslunnted for visitor-serving commercial uses.A portion of this area Is vacant, and the portion along Pacific Coast Highway supports a 'restaurant and hotel. This visitor-serving area is intended to provide additional .nren far visit o- r-sery intj uses oriented to Lnke -Street and may•act•as a buf for between possible six-sto devela ment across Lake Street and Ahe remaining medium density nren to OWnware Street. Botfi thr; medium density t re'sIdentini nnd vls tor-servin cummerc al areas car three story height limits. • i i • t k tr. r }ice , � t 1 •{. t t qJ }��[ 4 j}��fit'. {tea •n , `'�«, •�;.. {.,}(�• � t � '� , ;ti � '4�X � t n`YYsi 11 t t , , i 1� 1. , •t �.y� A. t .,lr }.�:� Y. . . '1T. ` i'�i�♦4 Gtfi ;' mat. r . r L = :• r •i • i• 3 • I • L • • r S 7 • 3 t • S f r r u0smam I •I - • • • M Aix i , r r f r r • f f .a Y r r. ti�w s 7i w1G\} {ei7�'� , ,t. 'I:V,1l , 'Ilk ,. x4� �{���e1,V�.���{J J,y{{{�;���+}!tl��lrti}�'�.t� j�+` ry l�wD �i����j,� �p y R� ,:•ky `a C,. e t �.. 4 rail' �rrr` }f' u i ,�t r{ri�j �1� � ^til.' r�5y;�1 �1 ,T;•�7: .�.fly�� ,T4� )�� �{,* tiYY1� a 1t ,]} '�'� l �•'`'y '1.i.��i � sr t,�t. '�' '�,,J'ct';,��Sf} y,�• '�' �" 4t r�•�+,7 �' r .. 1 ,.71`ia. n�'�' 'i7 ' `S' lf�i a,y T� 'L YY" r, tti•t• A ,�, 7 y' i3, y k TP ,. �1' � 4 �, i 1`9 1 r � ` S; t'i.4�`' , 1 ,Yi ����j. �y. + ��, i• L4,r y'bt.y,tti:.•;. 1r �Ii�. �'"f �it. ,1'��1 y t it'i'-�.{, tr t. Y, "�l ' till ;�\ r� �'.• ,y '� yy{{� Y ��•ks ! i+�.�� �.�ti���� ! •{��S ���,•�+�ik"k. ' .y�� j�f..')���! '�% �'�� ,..� �3• �''�+� � � � �� �. �. is !i+).�}k , } i( y �t•. �t^ ' +."�, 1 ti .1.t,h r ii f}�. � � "' t. ►tf 1 } # L �,•` � t t'�tt �1 1, �. { .i .7 :�„�' D 1��! •, .:}y'��tp' ''�:���J} �+r q �� � i jrFr `}���;* �t 7y�; .w►j�'�� 1��1+t'� � ��; ���.� ;r s`r �,` ��,��' [t � D ".R� � ! }ice � .' { �. y�, ,,t .i��Di'7,' ���� ��'�� t � �• �. Y .•�a 'Ir`��, , '�'�' � l.�S � 1/"` },�' 't of{I�• 1 C •.�1`\`1 1 4 t'i} yY'� ,.fi'41 i `'y '� t �r{ > T,,'�r 1 l ��* '+4; � 4 .E� �1,j.ti +. .e�,.{ `.•', �14�, '7�� f ,.t .�i!'''t.�.� r;,� , ,Ij'y'•�{+�F .� F���, � V �.. �'C ,�� ��A..,•1ti�" ��, ? �i }), i'�ic1 � �+,U �� ;y. �„11�1� S � D�.�k ��i��..� Sr � t r �+� tt#'k'fi1'A. z't.k'Y"r+.F.+lY �Y.' !Q T}l. t. rrK +:r.,.`)t}a ,� i)'... ',p r�� r i'. :p ►ek 1 ti,r!keli •'•u )Y.+ a t.� ,Y ir7'C'vrti ti'IU�-`} )^til�rr ,.�''v )'7,1, ,C, , r � rr '-D , � •, � A t �1 �r .k, .. . # t _ si t .y •U' i'. : .S��t .4r " N r; • ''fig: ,i ♦ ,y fir_ '1 47 14, Yo �t{i , it 111t'YYt• i�41r ftx',ykf ��.1. ����`�i+'�!•�' `,fir ;3� s ,rd� '�f1?j�lv '!�•,L�K r f� tp •r;" ly jxi�'�� + 6'«•ll�=j��IjTti'�}{� a ��i�� ,` 1�•! a�#j I•y f ,..• .t� d+ f �'t - f�+�tV+��5.1'\� 'Zr ��. S+ 7, .• tr rtq�. i�'1 y�4 �p ,. ,} ! y �' ,1ys• �', "' . , It�'� ; t�, j?'r� �t��,l °�') Y';'^�•' ,'�:!„'�".. � �i�t'4 � +'�I! L�/"��� '.'ryT ,x9 t •i: �, { 3� �. �' �1►ft'u•} , t �t`t` s. }. ,, ,tf � tie �•+�, �, S� �ti.�t � t S �;� ,��ei � I�;.�4, i��r�' V�1� {���{ '�� 5{'f. ,i�11� + 1:�7'�,;['yC•;`�'�• � � M!t' 1�. ?rit 11�' r1.4�w:♦ 'Xt ��.i 'r+i�'.;,�{�k�'.. ;�' ��'l� �':t!'�' t A� �k � 1'.�ir. �'�,t �S 1 '"r ,� rlJ�t�, ,b '��,r y}����1j�, .{V �f,��r� �2•rj+ �,,r �'4�„��S.efr'4'' iy.5�S� �'��!`15r�,v ,y�; r�1 ��,[ r���y�i��l� rfrL�'1 + ��i. jfA��'7�, � L l' � 1t `.� '���,,y�. �y`��•5�� '�r .t� ',t' r' .�St.!1�F''�-Y ` Y�� .����ti t.'r {*� ,1 {�7. �t °�j+ar.. f /:��1 �(` 7 t� F R�f fll.!'t�' �i.' ��'# 1 ��. ��,�iY�tC}�ii �{,�'` � �.Y j I'.��• t •{a t",.;�i 7`Y ;fi r .,,1 .•{ t ��' x , r ! {'. ; +rf> i' s ;+ z a, " ,' are '4 s • .rN• -ft Mi f t ' lt. f ,ff �lj7 1 r �, (� y ; M1 ,xl l t1 f tt ,r { R A }r t Y '{ y �� '� �' � ,�9 x{ 1 � 1��,�^'��� �t • ��`�'� `� y�' 's' ��;�, �r f�#,t,• y- . •i�' ��,�' ') �Z � s � ���+, ����� ;� �� t+\• �vt e� i 1.' r�k f T �r• t � }� ;'•', .,y� t,��, fr �'#• � ,r j# + � ' ��{ � �ji� ,5�; � A k�{, 7� # ��h+��l�)��,.�+ y �� + �r ]+ "y`��Y � +' ` ..�7��, -!' ��t1i�'4 � +•���'����� ry �p�jh+ ���+�y� e, i +� ►� �'�j„s.. �y� -� �. �{! '�#` #� �y '{.� 'fib,V'S+1 �������.!'' c t � � { -• S ?p •'"{'#}{( NU t—.'t�{3 !�{)i✓r yp�/t{`y �` ..� "� �� � ��"i � �• t 1�+�,. •,'� fit': ;4.. 4� '•itk:,�ri. •�•r Y"t+'+i•RY,•[1:.� ! "Y,tf,• .�. L ,F 1�M���i H ,# .�.htf��.t�Y' .9;17'{�.t9„ }I yf�•i ,�,���i.�+.. 'i�� y \�, y'�!���� t/��1• �F� 9 '� • ,.. *, ,. 'M - + :.;. '" !,'1'�'#Xy, +.'+G �!'�• LL.r ,.e� < � t,f�r`�?•.�' !,�'; t.;u},fLY,i'"'t�': t.i �� �r� ""t•T'+�µ�1�Y'Ni1 .� ,..� y' ..4■S. �r ....t is J �.1�k,Y:`. ry4.' ..1 .Mt � �• •',�. 1_• k ' ! 3 'Y'h•'^ r� t' RR t iR t! •r��� V9 �1. ,.•. iJ� 3tiSt ✓. vn���,j),.y r IL � k .S t'ri'!`ei7�l r., ,} tj�J F 4w.T� a1j' �•� }`t�t 1',��r� 'h' �`;ghh" fi,��,'1i.,>v ,���,���. +..� 'S }�G f( y r�y� � ♦ � �'� � .� #� •f �y�Y �r� �t 1� �?+. y��,�� {." �((�ihYF!"r+__t� � tt°V � �� ��t�f 1 N �a���i '�C��, i Y •' T�l'' ���.`°� �'1'��i 5���'� ^'ayi�� �' rF��� � �F•F4'(��► �� '(i�,� ��: '+�'pp try��' .i `� cfS4Y��222��`�r'.• ��!'SS��� ���)l�. r .��; r,•� ,♦, r Y4 � }� 1 3• � � } 4 1j�a �ti� .: 5t ,t � rLKa.. �� �,7 �1 y, r"'q i v,ti�;q�j�`y��'h ' 1� .a � • �� w'�i� � � '`� ij � t'. � ,t�},�, r r ,� '�' ��.' �i*.�i> �� ��,�f .� �dp�tt�� .r� �� k��x �t�14� �{ ,'�`. �r.3 �' }�• �y�� .�R r ., � � i � ,+�1 it � w�hi�3�'r�•tt 1 Z� �.- ii1 �u- Y l .+ -l t ,� tiHa a-t �! ,{ '`r� u �/� '� ;7�+i a �t 4ty T'•` °" l +�. 1 ht i ) ; `� ?`, �i3,4 r{1�' ' '� t'�� t � � ` Y 7��'•. �r !'` J �r��t�yy �r ., •�.`{�•iL e4 fr�1+,,�'�� v " � �: i".t� �S t��'1F �r�i� � , a F, rim � . 'R �k �! " Y ?, .�t�� �` � � 1. � • `i a t '+ A�1 � G � { .� V : ,� :�,]. ► ,� S�„� �•t! � }i ` r R��� '� ` e R xi,k Y � , S ���-' ,��� S� t w,�i',�,1 {�$�� k N MIA �� r ►�t +� ♦ Al 11 if ' 1^ �='t �' ,x�: 1 �� .3•�`����s.• � �� '' .�}� q '!�� aL��i , "+� 't ���1 >v� �� °ti .��1.•ti `+��'�'��'� �t ,+t' rr a, r, r• 1 �ti < J � i 1 ! �k� � �� f ��� 31�' k, ♦ �� 'tile.♦ � �� � .� � .�� � ,� 1• � .�_ «' •,�s"1`�� •�, 4 r�' ��r , X Y 1 '�� v� M11"�ti►� N 8 "1 ; �'�r"r'�iti�,�. ► i�i � rye`' .� �' 'i, � A... Y;• �1�1 ,t i � 7,9.h ,.e• '�3 Y,Y qr�i R , 3 1 1..� ^��. ;',., ,,, ,., !!.:' � •a' � r F i 10.5.1 RECREATION AND SHORELINE ACCESS The coastal zone contains significant public recreation opportunities. Of groat Importance are the rity's nine miles of heaches which provide recreational opportunities for over eight million visitors annually. Demand for recreation in the coastal zone Is expected to double in the next fifteen years. in order to provide enjoyable recreation for this anticipated level of visitors and for City residents, It Is important that the City preserve and protect existing recreation sites, particularly beach sand areas. I. Provide for maximum recreational opportunities along the City and State beaches. 1a. prohibit development of permanent above-ground structures on the beach sand area with the exception of the following permitted uses: Lifeguard towers and other facilities necessary for public - safety Public restrooms and beach concession stands when located Immediately adjacent to paved parking *or access* areas ' I - Reconstruction and expansion related to the Municipal Pier Fire rings and volleyball nets Bike trails, bike support facilities, and handicapped access, t ; expanal 8q-6;--P.04ny-t-WItti+D4--i�iSt--VFkiiiid^-P z; - - f- �rtua-.c#-park g.a ll'W es--on- . 1�1i1Ft�14�}ENR�dt��Aela—•a . a .piaao.. .. .. *lb. Prohibit, expansion of Orkinc� facilities that�would result in the loss of-recreational san area- expansion of oarklncl facilities•on Huntin ton State Bench hetwAnn the existl parkinq area and Pacific Coast High ay wool a erm tte e( to: City gproval of desivn and landscapingplans - State assurance that cut s gutters,sidewalks, transit turnouts and street li htin�w�il! be provided when improvements to this section oi- {C fie Coast Highway are implemented.* 1c. Prohibit groins, cliff retaining wnlis, pipelines, outfalls, and other i such construction that may alter natural shorel',nc processes unless designed to eliminate or mitigate adverse impacts on local shoreline sand supply. s�--la1#owl N--3�uot--fuuae�• raIts. 150. i .�twMI '�".^n"-.F»w�"•'rerg':".``."::!"': „Y,,..*t�..s r_-xer,,.-,,,•.,.....�.»_- ------- t In addition to preserving the existing amount c f space available for recreational use, the City shall also encourage Cie pruylsion of additional recreation areas and facilities in the coastal zone: 2. Protect, encourage and where feasible provide a variety of recreation facilities whlch provide opportunities for all income groups. 2a. Provide opportunities for recreational fishing anO support facilities an the Huntington Beach Pier. e 2b. Require that arty plans for restoration or replacement of the Municipal Pier include the following provisions: Areas for recreational fishing and support facilities - Unobstructed publir.iiiews seaward from the end of the Pier - Significant opportunities for unobstructed public views of the ocean and shoreline I F's 'i 4. r � , • I I i f f l i 150�a. t 't":1ryA ... .,�,.ygf_• c c' 'Y - Pedestrian accem as the primary mock_, of circulation an the Pier A minimum of 50 percent of the total area of the Pier as public open space 2c. Support the development of the Balsa Chica tinear park and the Implementation of a continuous trail system from Huntington Central Part._ to the beach along the perimeter of the Balsa Chico; establish an implementation plan for'- the Bolan Chien linear park in cooperation with the County of Orange. 2d. Support recreational facilities in the 80sa Chien Linear Park that: Emphasize a low intensity character for that portion of the park within the city's coastal zone. Locate any higher intensity uses in nodes consistent with adjacent areas. - Limit aboveground structures to support facilities such as restroams, picnic tables and bike racks. Site all uses so as to preserve views to the adjacent Balsa Chica. 2e. Pursue implementation of a bike trail from the Pier to the southern edge of the Balsa Chica State Beach parking lot in order to provide a continuous bike trail along the beach within the City. 2f. Provide additional bike racks to encourage the use of City and State beaches as a destination point for bicyclists, and encourage the State to do the same. 2g. Actively pursue county, State and federal funding for conchal projects including: Rer:ov-ition of the Huntington ©each Municipal Pier. Provision of nature walks and other educatinnal opportunities in environmentally sensitive habitats where compatible. - Development of the Bolso Chien linear park. 2h. Encourage the provision of public boating support facilities compatible with surrounding land uses and water quality. { 21. Encourage additional dry storage areas for boats In Industrial areas zoned Nil. J � 1 2j. Ectabllsh the responsibility for maintenance prior to approval of a marina or other major recreational facility. 2k. Encourage privately-owned recreation facilities to be open to the a public. 151, i, f C R r 21. Encourage, where feasible, facilities and programs which increase and enhance public recreational opportunities in Huntington Harbour. Because the City bears many local It pncta associated with intense beach recreation, It is important that,local costs and concerns are addressed by the State In any development of both 9olsa Chlca and Huntington State Beaches. The following policies address development of State beaches, in general, and the specific plans by the State to upgrade Huntington State Beach In the near future: -3. Ensure local Interests and concerns are Included In State and regional recreation planning. 3a. Require review and approval by the City of final development plans prior to permittinc any additional development on the State beaches. 3b. Prior to permitting any additional development on Huntington State Beach require: Review and approval by the City of final lands-ape and architectural plans. Location'of new facilities and landscaping in a manner that minimizes ptiblic view blockage and that enhances visually N, degraded areas. Location of now facilities In n manner that maximizes the area of beach sand available for recreational use. - Location of comfort stations within or adjacent to parking facilities. - Provision of drop-off and turn-around facilities for public transit. - Provision of bu-i parking areas. - Removal of the existing chain link fence; City review and approval of the location, design and materials of any fencing necessary for safety purposes. - Access provisions for early beach users. ' Direct physical access to the City's shoreline is provided by it's nine miles of Public beach. With i.he exception of the residential development just north of the Municipal Pier, no major structures exist between the ocean and Pacific Coast Highway which significantly prevent public access. Thus the following access policies focus on: 1) increasing the safety of beach access (e.g., crossing Pacific Coast Highway and traversi� , the bluffs just north of Eleventh Street), 2) increaaing public awareness of access opportunities in the coastal zona, and 3) li creasing public access opportunities in Huntington Harbour. 4. Provide public access to coastal resources when possible. 4a. Require an easement in ull new development to allow access to *end alon * the mean high tide line or to public recreation areas t or to public trails and bikeways unless: 3 t 15x. a r �� �.��� ..'���!�`ru�.lNii��'s'�.Y7,�irc '�t,r��a',y'.Y+N�Ft.r'.,`3 :ts'Y�"+s YS�f•`�r".1�'1'�r 'A7'nik��kS.'r��ta'r..'�'7'�5.h��r". 'S'�.'�.�.:�.;:r".�i?4Y!�f.'`.�• ., Anequate access exists nearby or is proposed by the land use plan within a reasonable distance; or Access at the site would result in unmitigable adverse Impacts on areas designated "Conservation" by the land use plan,,or { Findings are made, consistent with Section 30212 of the ; Coasts! Act that access is Inconsistent with public safety, 1 military security needs, or that agriculture would be adversely affected, or. S The parcel is too narrow for an' bdequate buffer separating the lateral nccessway from private residen—e and would therefore adversely affect the privacy of the pr:.perty owner. I � *These exceptions shall not apply to the Pacific Electric z - RiQht-of-Ylay.�' ! 4b. Analyze the impact of current and projected recreation traffic on the City's circulation system. Gc. Promote safe pedestrian access to the beach from the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway. 4d. initate conperative planning etforts with the State Park and Recreation, Department and affected private parties and pursue funding to develop a pedestrian access program frc`m Pacific roast Highway to the beach in the area *from Ninth Streets north to the southern 0 0 of the o�olso CChica State Beach parking lot. 4f. Establish a signing program which will identify public accessways, bikeways, recreation areas and vista points M, i thrGughout the coasts* zone. 41. Preserve and where possible, provide additional public access to we Huntington Harbour watt. nays; assemble for t public lnformat=-:,i the full legal documentation to idsntify the public rights-of-wpy, ownership and other agreements concerning the Huntington Harbour channels including applicable homeowners association deed restrictions. 4h. Promote public access to coastal witiands for limited nature j study, passive recreation and other low intensity uses compatible viith the sensitive nature f�, these areas. I 41. Punjua local, State and federal funding to provide and + maintain boardwalks, peripheral trails, Interpretive exhibitfl { and other educational facilities in coastal wetlands. 10.5.2 VISITOR SERVIi rl FACILITIES Additional support facilities are necessary in order to accommodate the large numbers of visitors attracted to recreation areas in the coastal zone. The coastal land use plan is designed to provide for sufficient areas strategically located to nerve the needs of existing and future levels of visitors. The intent of the following policies Is to epeclficaily encourage ndequnte vls�tor nrcnmmodations. 153. # i ,x 5. Protect, encourage and where feasible provide visitor serving facilities in the coastal zone which are varied in type and price. 5a. Encourage the provision of additional restaurants and hotellmo!el accommodations *in kee ing with the alternative chosen_ by the City Councii.* 5b. Encourage additional overnight R.V. camping facilities, odgquately screened, in the recreation areas an both sides of Newland Street near Pacific Coast Highway and on tte State beach parking lots during the winter months. 5,a. Establish as a continuing program the dual use of the City beach parking lots for recreational vehicle camping during winter months. 10.5.3 VISUAL. RESOURCES The coostal,zone contains significant visual amenities, including the ocean and 'shoreline, natural bluffs, wetland areas and 'mature trees. , Public views to these visual features in Lthe coastal.zone are "resources" in iMmselves. New development can disrupt and destroy visual resources and public views. The foilo.:ing policies focus on protecting and enhancing existing visual amenities In the coastal -zone primarily through regulation of the location and design of new development: } 6. Preserve and enhance visual resources within the coastal zone. { 6a. Ensure: new development within the coastal zone includes the i features listed below nnd establish review procedures for implementation. - Preservation of public views to and from L!uffs, to the shoreline and ocean, and to wetlands. - Conservation of energy and facilitation of public transit through design and siting. ' - Adequate landscaping and vegetation. i; - Evaluation of project design regarding visual Impact. I� 6b. Prohibit any alteration of the natural landform of the bluffs seaward of Pacific Coast Highway Including grading and the dove!opment of parking lots** alterations necessary for develo ment of ublic trails and stabilization of bluffs_ may be permitted subject to City approva►.* 6c. Prohibit development along the bluffs rising up to the Bolsa Chico mesa (within the i ity's Jurisdiction) which will alter tho natural Isndform or threaten the stability of the bluffs. 6d. Encourage cluster development in areas designated for residential uoo within the coastal zone. ' 6a. Prohibit new billboards within tho coastal zone. 154. 1 i '�p 4 6f. Establish special regulations far the coastal zone for on-premise signs which may include but will not be limited to.- r Prohibition of signs which do not display Information related to 'an activity, service or commodity available on the premisess. - Limits to the height, size,,design and rnaterials of signs. Prohibitic.i of roof-top signs. Restrictions cn the use of lights and moving marts in signs. Enforcement of maintenance controls. 6g. To the maximum extent feasible, require the preservation of existing mature':rPea within the coastal zone. 61h. Pursue funding to; Identify entry points to the coast and develop scenic entry r markers to strengthen the visual relationship of the City to its beaches; and - Establish a coordinated .; theme and Implement design standards for public signing In the coastal zone. 61. Pursue the establishment of Pacific Coast Highway as a State Scenic Highway. } 61. Adopt a zoning ordinance which contains regulations 'adequate to achieve State Scenic Highway status for Pacific Coast Highway. *6k. Establish landscoeing ordinances/ uldelines spec If Ing va dtatio'n typos or the coastal area.* Maintaining and protecting existing visual amenities is a high priority in the coastal plan. There is also need, however, to improve virually degraded areas. The intent of the following policies is to improve the appearance of the coastal zone through various means including screening, landscaping and/or removal of vicuaily degrading facilities. 7. . Improve the appearance of visually degraded areas. 79. Promote the screening of uses that detract from the scenic quality of the coast along public rights-of-way and within public view. 7b. Promote a cooperative agreement between the City and the State to landscape narking arena along the State beaches. 7c. Require the removal of all existing billboards along Pacific Coact Highway within five yaars of certification of the LCP. 7d. Consider the following priority within the coastal zone for undergrounding of E+W"oe. "overhead utility and telephone lines, In accordance with the rules and regulations of the California N51 c t Iitles Commission.* 1�5. (1) Pacific Coast Highway (2) Beach Boulevard, Adams Street to Pacific Coast Highway. (3) Bronkliurst Street from Hamilton Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway. (4) Magnolia Street from Hamilton Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway. (5) Goldenwest Street from Huntington Central Park to Pacific Coast Highway. 7e. Investigate the feasibility ' of rerouting . or undergrounding transmisQion lines which currently traverse wetlands. 7f. Develop a report to tha City Counall on the litter problem In the coastal zone particularly the Beach Boulevard to Santa Ana River mouth area. This report should includ&: • identification of the causes and extent of the litter'problem Id the coastal zone. , Estnblishment of responsibility for litter control. Proposed actions to improve litter cleanup. Identification of sources of federal and State funding for I f fitter control. 7g. Where Jeaslble, require landscaped-medlans along.Pacif ie Coast Highway prior to permitting any *.ma or* improvements. *which 4: would increase the capacity of the highway.* 10.5.4 WATER AND MARINE RESOURCES The Coastal Act requires that marine resources be 'maintalned, enhanced and where feasible, rer,tored.. The coastal zone'r, groundwater basins, wetlands end surface waters are continually Impacted by poliutents normally associated with urban activities and land uses. New development -adjacent to'Constal waters and wetlands can pose additional 'threats to the quality-of marine resources, especially if diking, dredging or filling activities ara involved. The Intent of the following policies is to prevent the degradation of marine resources In the coastal zone due to activities associated with an urban environments S. Promote measures to mitigate the adverse impacts of human activities I: on marine organisms and the marine environment. i Do. Require that development plans include mitigation measures to a prevent the degradation o water quality o groundwater basins P 9 f g I Y f 9 t wetlands, or surface water. 9b. Require containment curtains around waterfront construction 3 projects on inland waterways to control drift of turbid waters. Dc. investigate the feasibility of requiring additional water conservation measures for new development to reduce waste water flow. Dd. Prior to approval of any now or expanded outfalls, Fagwlrs *encaurago the provision of* mitigation measures to prov&4 *minimize* d.:mage to marine organisms *in accordance with State and edcral low.* 156. 1 Be. Prior:. to approval of any new n.,�,$xpanded seawater pumpiny facilities, faqu!FM •*enc'oUike the proyieton;of* maximum feasible mitigation measures to p;@uoat. '*minimize* damage to marine organisms due to entrainment 'in accordance with State and { federal law.* Bt. Llrrilt diking, dredging, and filling of coastal waters; wetlands, and estuaries to the specific activities outlined in Section 30233 of the Coastal. Act and to those activities required for the restoration, maintenance, and/or 'repair of the Municipal Pier; conduct any diking,: dredging , and filling activities in a manner that is consistent with Section 30233 of the Coastal f.ct. i 8g. Support the Orange County Water District's Barrier.Walls project. E Btu. Assess the adequacy of the existing water quality monitoring and �. If found inadequate, establish a more affective program. 81. If it is determined that water quality in Huntington Harbour is below acceptabi}: quality, establish improvement,measures such as requiring boat pumpout or holding tank facilities on existing development. 8j. If monitoring data indicate low dissolved oxygen conditions in Huntington Harbour channels, develop mitigation measures such as a system of soration devices. 8k. Require that new development employ, catch bestna and storm drains with baffled compartments where uncontrolled drainage could damage sensitive areas. I 10.5.5 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE HABITATS Coastal Act policies cieariy rcatrlc; uses and activities that are to be allowed In wetland areas. The City implements these Coastal Act policies primarily through its designation of all wetland areas in the coastal zone as Conservation. Coastal Act policy also requires that environmentally sensitive habitats be protected against the detrimental impacts of new development when proposed adjacent to these areas. The Intent of the following policies is to provide for this protection: 9. Preserve and enhance environmentally sensitive habitats. (`including the Balsa Chica which is within the s hern of influence of the City of Huntington each.* �ec�wtt�r}or--eta slits---Gaxaz..--k{igtaW.ay.--vubi3� d �d.hzhiLat. 9b. Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands that does not adversely impact habitat values. 9c. Require new development contiguous to wetland areas to Include buffers which will consist of ono or rnom nf the following: 157. One, hundred :foot setback from, the edge of the watland *except'alonq Pacific Coast HighWay*... A► visually attractive tidrrier that limits physical, but not visual, access. Difference in elevation sufficient to deter access. 4d. Develop specifications for buffers around watland areas. 7e. Establish a procedure to notify State and Federal agencies having regulstary authority in wetlands and other environmentally sensitive habitats 'when devolopment projects in and adjacent io such areas are submitted to the City. Although excluded from urbar, development, wetland areas can be of beneficial value to the City by providing significant visual and recreational amenities to the, local community. However, the lowlands In Huntington Beach will require improvements before their potential is realized. The following policies provide a strategy for enhancing the biological and aesthetic quality of these areas: 10. Promote th.. improvement of the biological productivity and appearance of wetland habitats. 10a. Promote the reestablishment of tidal flushing In wetland areas. 106. Promote the participation of *County,* State and•federal agencies In the enhancement and maintenance of environmentally sensitive habitats by actively pursuing funding from the California Coastal Conservancy and other State and federal agencies to develop and t maintain landscaped buffer areas around the edge of the ' wetlands*.* s Pis," mouth j10c. Require that agencies involved in the enhancement of wetlands: - site and design culverts to insure against the risk of flood damage In adjacent property, and - develop n contingency plan- to protect environmentally sensitive habitats In the evenr:af spills of toxic and other harmful substances into the flood control channels. 10d. Request that the Oran je County Flood Control District improve the Huntington Beach and Talbert Flood Control Channel embankments from ©each Boulevard to the Santa Ana River with plantings of native plant species to enhance wildlife divsrsity and visual appearance In the watland arena. i 1 j� 15g� i 10.5.6 ENERGY Most - energy facilities serve greeter-then-local communities. Many also Involve highly technical processes which local governments cannot continually monitor and evaluate. For both of these reasons, regulation over many energy Issues has passed from the !c-Lal government to State and federal agencies. NonetheCess, energy, facilities can profoundly affect tiie community In which they locate. The City has a stake, consequently, In participating in decisions about energy Issues which affect Huntington Beach. The following policies are Intended to enable the City to monitor those issues which 'effect its Interesta, and to act mare'effectively with other agencles'In promoting the beneficial effects of energy activities .and mitigating their ` adverse Impacts. 11. Establlah the Interaction and coordination with other levels of government as a City function for energy-related issues affecting the City - of Huntington Beach; promote better coordination among city departments. lla. Identify more completely the State and federal agencies with control or influence over energy issues and the role each plays in resolving those issues. r lib. Identify the opportunities for local input In the planning and 'r decision-making processes of State and federal agencies Involved with energy Issues. f llc. Monitor energy activities that could affect Huntington Beach by 1) Joining mailing lists of relevant State and federal agencies, 2) commenting on EIR's, EIS's, call-for-nominations for OCS tract selections and other reviews, 3) periodically meeting with major energy companies In the City. Ild. Inventory and review existing ail spill plans and identify the role of the municipality (if any)in each. Ile. Cooperate with the U.S. Coast Guard In the Local Response Tenm by providing personnel and equipment In an all spill emergency. llf. Support efforts of the U.S. Geological Survey and by the State Division of Oil and Gas to cisure the safety of oil extraction and related activities onahore and offshore. llg. Support efforts by the U.S. Coast Guard and the Army Corps of Engineers to protect marine traffic safety while accommodating offshore all development. i 159. E f IlknfGF dIts— to p4t qVq up a;W to eeHtiti �pqF-,-ra:;•--rhev w11h. 'Ames xOii' Cadexand related,zoning;ordinances; if necessary. to:",Incomerate Qrovisions:for the ,retention j;-of access •to underground Al-reserves in new surface developments-0 111. Promote 'increased -coordination among municipal departments charged with different aspects of energy planning and regulations and establisti a common data base for all departments involved with energy issues. 11J. identify the location, status and ownership of all wells ©nd tanks In the City; account for discrepancies between State and City, records regarding number, location and s`.atu3 of wells. Huntington Beach has traditionally pl ayed layed an., important role in supplying �,. ;t margy to this region. The importance of energy to the local community as well, ss to the State and nation argues that these vital energy facilities ,be ?� accommodated in the future and that new trehnology which Increases energy supplies or mvikes them leas expensive, should be, encouraged. At the oarne i f times the City must consider adverse impacts on.the environment and an the public welfare, and must balance energy goals with other goals, especially In the coastal zone. The following policy addresses this concern: ' 12. Encourage the production of energy resources as efficiently as possible With minimal adverse impacts. Ike. Support the research, development and application of now energy technologies so long as public health, safety and welfare are not Jeopardized and environmental Impacts are mitigated to the maximum possible extent. Y : j 12b. ' *A.% pert of the exlstinq environmental review pracesss* require the mitigation of adverse impacts from new technologies employed In electricity generation to the maximum extent A feasible. 12c. Encourage unitization and consolidation of oil operations when such activities (1) reduce the area used for oil fnellities, (2) are s. not more environmentally disruptive than existing arrangements and(3) do not Jeopardize public health, safety or welfare. 12d. Utilize the 11-0" (oil) suffixes to ensure that coastal dependent energy extraction Is accommodated In areas designated other than "resource productions" except for "conservation" areas. 12e. Update the City Oil Code to include consideration of "onhanced" oil recovery activities and to ensure the evaluation of Impncts different from those ansociated with conventional extraction. j i I 160. I • �.+x '� � :;.. '.`,�;•"`�`r;"..'' P :��?.�':��: ^�;'�Y"Sri:E ��,::��"r�"" :z�r "�c'�.9"ct+aG�: �-.�'kc�.Ca �3��s�Xr 12f. Study advanced recovery methods likely to be employed In the Huntington Beach field and their potential impacts; consider . establishing a permitting system for these new activities. 12g. Review the City Oil Code to determine the adequacy of measures to protect public safety; modify tt+e Oil Code, if necessary, to adequately protect public safety. 12h. Review monitoring and enforcement of the City Oil Coda and j Noise Ordinance as related to energy operations to determine their effectiveness in regulating energy operations, and where ne cessary adopt Improvements. 121. Evaluate spill plans to see if they recognize especially sensitive areas In the City, Including Huntington Harbor, the wetlands, the Snnta Ana River mouth and the Least Torn Nesting Area, and if the•# include measures to protect these in case of a major spill; petition relevant agencies to amend spill plans if the plans lack such measures. 121. Determine whether existing requirement; for all spill plans are adequate to protect public health, safety and welfare. In Huntington Beach; modify the Oil Coda, if necessary, to ensure such protection from spills. 12k. Review the tank farms and the surrounding areas to evaluate possible impacts in case of, dike system failure; develop an emergency evacuation plan specifically for the areas adjacent to the tank farms if such a plan Is necessary. 121• Investigate the possibility of obtaining funding or compensation for activities related to the prevention, monitoring and clean-up of oil spills. 12m. Promote the use of solar energy and encourage energy conservation. 12n. Inventory existing credits and incentives regarding solar energy and conservation available to individuals, busineses and the City from State and federal governments and make this information i available to the public. 12o. aaneeo-r+►ga�dias} ; •Encour_ age_dev�ment of naw methods to conserve oneMy such ab* s') solar access &nd orientation, 2 solar water heating requlrements for new developments, (3) the limited use of conventional fuels for heating swimming pools, (4) requirements for "weatyerizatlon" and other minimum conservation measures, and (5) energy audits of buildings-at time of deed transfer. Considering how vital reliable energy sources ere to the region and the notion, the City should encourage fixture oil production and new energy technology so long as critical environmental and public welfare considerations are protected. Existing and now oil facilities should be encouraged to consolidate where feasible to help reduce the amount of land used for oil activities: i6% i i 13. Plan for new energy production facilities In order to maximize efficiency anc+ minimize their adverse impacts on coastal resources. 13a. Adopt the following priority for siting new oil-related facilities, provided that in each case (a) the new activities are adequately screened and buffered from surrounding uses,,: .(b) adverse environmental impacts_. are mitigated to the maximum extent feasible, (c) the activities do not jeopardize public health, onfety ;. or welfare, and (d) there is no ether feasible location which is less 1 environmentally damaging or less disruptive of significant social, aesthetic or economic conc:er►is. F (1) existing consolidated islands (including the entire Aminall lease) (2) new consolidated islands (3) existing oil parcels (4) new parcels outside the coastal zone (5) new parcels within the coastal tone r. I 13b. Encourage the use of excess capacity of existing facilities; !` approve construction of new, separation and treatment facilltlee only :if It is Infeasible to utilize the excess capacity of existing facilities and is consistent with the resource protection policies 'S:• :. ' i ; contained In this plan. 13c. Encourage the phase-out of existing wells on the Oceanside of Pacific Coast Highway; approve no new *onshore* wells or redrllling on the Oceanside of Pacific Coast Highway unless all of r the following conditions are met (1) 'the resources are not recoverable from any other onshore location or existing platform, !' (2) the alto Is improved to bccomc compatible with recreation uses i of tlu3 beach, (3) public health, safety and welfare are not jeopardized, (4) adverse environmental impacts are mitigated to the maximum extent feasible, (5) the net overall impact of all production facilities on visual resources is improved, and (6) safe access to the beach is provided. A.ppr4wx-pipal ra..�U...S�cra..nitba�r- axtatlxu}.orudwxr�-cam ; a k�aro-i saws pp�uu�s- �}I-�.-a�aditr,,cx�:•d•.rr�-ei� Goi�-�tatc�d. iA-s:hie-psru�. M. Ay�aia *Ro� the expansion of existing tanker unloading operations .Gaon *tq daterinino whether there •19 nn increased threat* poWd*to recroatinnnl activ tles nrd--i—ensltive 'lia itals ,ln the area*.#4a" oaoe -t -s+e -.a#-1,� 3r�rct+-Saar;-l�us-A agal"orta-tww. t�.kas�pwt►:F:a�.. 13f. Encourage the use of pipelinEs rather than tankers, where feasible, to transport offshore oil and gaA to share. 1 I II 162. i �',�i"� ";8'S"iiiwr.��"°�'�t���'���" '3. .. �3 ;•�dw 4;'JA.Y�•.,.�t��` ���'.�_'z_��':�5?�'�+'�' ::+.'2'`+�:�.",.��"kuc�l-'@s'f�•;:Zr.'C,...i_.t'�i`:..:ii .. .+...'��+sr 13g. Prehlbil *Discourage* new marine terminals from locating in Huntington Beach. 13h. A`a part`° of tha°exlstin9 environmental;'review process;* require that a survey be conducted along the route of any new pipeline in the coastal zone to determine what, if any, coastal resources may be impacted by construction and operation of the pipeline,*.11 ou :mita +h -fit i- ef-6148 eta:way-elist- e-br ae-f`�►,�Tha-aPp1 aa41 131. eke•*Encourage* the routes of new pipelines and transmission lines to•, avoid important coastal resources, . Including recreation areas and sensitive hab!tats, to the maximum extent feasible; pipelines which cannot be -routed to avoid such areas bW4-- *ehould* be constructed and maintained in ways'that minimize tho Impacts. .from spills or leaks; appropriate cleanup nrd spill prevention measures -o i41- *should* be in:Iuded in a spill contingency plan. 13]. �'#iegrrlre►-*Conalder`requirin automatic shutoff valves to isolate sagments of a pipeline�— (except gas lines) passing through Important coastal resource areas, including recrection, sensitive habitat and archaeological areas. 13k. +�Qa. art' of the.axisting.•enyiron'mental ret�iew�iciaceoat* require the mitigation.of erosion in the siting and construction of new pipelines. 131. Prohibit the use of *chemicrrl4; herbicides during pipeline construction. 13m. 44acjk4na• *Encourage* new pipoline or transmission line corridors to be consolidated with existing pipeline or el— trical transmission corridors, where feasible, unless there are overriding technical constraints or a ificant social, aesthetic, rnvironrr•ontal or i econornic concern,. ` On. *Ae' "art'"af the 'oXtstln onvlronmental""review!process,` rc gdka m tigation measures to* #fro-r, ► repair-a�scarring, grading,or other vegetative removal resulting from •.transmission line or pipeline Installation or maIntenance through methods including but not limited to spreading topsoil removed in pipeline trenching over the surface of the construction area; effected areas are to be revegetated with plants similar to those in the arer.. As land near the coast continues to be developed, other land uses vilil be pressed., cicser to oil activities. The Intent of the following policies is to ensure the compatibility amnnq different activities an safety and aesthetic criteria- 14. *Promote 'carnpattblllttX uf-' -R uii o oil and other e:.ergy-related activities 4tw-ba-evw4x► bM-with surrounding uses to the maxi�Tstum extcint feasible. 1630 �......,..,..:.✓+rp;it�.�.i`...f+y ♦.....:. .. . ................ .......... . ...... .. .... ,—s,.. ., i.. ., .. ....i . .. ...1u. .., ,•',.'�.'.ir�.,. ,. .,.... .•::i„,.- Ti`'�..1:+�iid%t]Fa.'' -r f:� �, � M„ll �t'1t1�'• i#t✓� r 43' ,� .� i 14a. Review and rnodify the Oil Code, if necessary, to include f measures such as additinnal requirements regarding fencing, planting and landscaping to ensure aesthetic and environmental compatibility between oil activities and other uses. ! 14b. Pursue strategies with the State and the all companies to improve the appearance of existing oil wells and related facilities nn the ocean side of Pacific Coast Highway. a Appropriate Ediaer�-pews •a), *14e. Before permitting'- any. expansion of ''the Edison "pnwer `plant, rewire,,development of a-comprehensive screening plan with i sepr9priate landssc�caR�in which meets the standard of• State agencies h.avIng jurisdiction over such expansion.* 14d. Encourage comprehensive planning for now uses on large all ' pa;cell; discourage piece-meat recycling of oil parcels. 14e. Encourage dual-uses of cil `field surface areas so long as (1) new uses and oil activities are compatible, and (2) acceso to . underground zones can be accommodated by the new use. i 3 14f. Encourage the conversion of the rotary mud clump an Hamilton { and Magnolia to new uses if the contents of the dump are found not to be dangerous to public'hoalth, safety and welfare, or if all ! harmful deposits are decontaminated. ° 1pg. +►As ert'& the exiati = environmental review proceas,* require a chemical analysis of the contents of the reaary mud dump, a geological study of the site and necessary mitigation measures before allowing new uses on the rotary mud dump. +14h. Encourage'`-screentngkbf existing Edison power plant facilities `via f; planting of. trees°and shrubs pursue strategies to this end with Southern California Edison." 10.5.7 HOUSING The City's adopted Housing Element to the General Plan identifies and Ancumcints housing needs and establishes a program to address such' housing }, 7 needs. it is the basic ducument which guides housing development throughout the city, including the coastal zone. However, the Housing Element does not automatically meet all the requirements of the Coastal Act. Thus, more specific policies related to the co:utal zone have been included in this plan while the Housing Element policies , which established overall direction have been Incorporated by reference. 15. Promote adequate housing opportunities within the coastal zone for ell Income groups. 15a. Incorporate the City's Hoetsing Element as representing; the major portion of the housing component of the L.CP and adopt the following additional policies which shall apply to the Huntington Beach Coastal Zone: t64. a1'H•w..«•......,+.. ...._..._........_.... .. ,.....,-.......... .-...._..._... ...... ............ ._...........,�,.... .. ...,. .-,.,....d'.'.:e:r. .:?i::f+L:K:itL{51..r�:v'ai fi7�'.%f t+z,1^aSF'�j. r 1-5i.- 1'3inoaWGM +rat an Sr-�teek 44 ddaaaesq-th� kw4oq+- ;w PGOPAW ng-aa44O F 161 M}-amide rises kler uric -aai1.64�te- 15c. Investigate. the feasibility of implementing an expanded grant prograIm for. Fnehlla-Ua w-*low- and moderate-Income housing! rehabilitation*. Including mobile home-0 A V' ar*- 1 . # the G Dotal- ' P -1410ti of 5-or. U. i--daise—aaQ- 15f. CoordIh6.t'e,.with the Orange County Housing Authority*and=local . holtain ., ra onents (builders' real estate board"'Memberst lenderri ; consumers)o to Yelop a program to. prov or cost nue affordabn y' for all low and moderate Income units rosulting from inclusionary and replacement policies. +,�5q. Encourage the retention'of ex.tetl numbers of'mobile hamee and n"st gate areas,for ontent al new mobile harriff zon ns�.,� +►6hm+;--;he-Ge • • "-r ,.vwa w.rfr:/r�....A.-0G'.:'a`ft r'L.Itwtl::i t: 4•t`..:a.. - , .. .. _ ..... .. . .+... ee ?_ a ..r .. ., .. ... , .11.. .. ... .. .'.d /.♦ . iF ,.y�itri;Wwt:�i?.yl'L.M jO *15h. R� ulre that •Zq`d erlci nt of>:nil new resldential-"projects:afi, 0 'or more units be:affordable tn"lnw nnd.'moderate,!Income.,households aa+define a •Jthevt`lt 's,Houshi ,.Element.' Vl eve a erei e J nve theoption w-to;provlaa:,, heoifforde-Sle>un to , within ivt or."�it oute a iikvt er�.%coastal, ,:zonuAA *New--il-rea ent I al eve a ments,olose tFan-20 un is ma a .o " er-unit'R•fee•im lieu a : ercent,of,t a pra ect eln .affordable to1 ow and moderate neome hoyapho s• ,=,.rents units are.:oxcludea Tram,, the re uirem©nts•of this eollcY; smaller prolects of ton or l;ss units will be excluded from the provisions of this policy.* w , • Y I 4 r ' 1 '1 it f 1 1p.5.8 COMMUNITY FACILITIES A prerequisite;. to,.any development in the coastal..zone ,is- the. provisicn of edequete community facilities. Public works facilities-in the coastal lone are for the most part adequate to service the level of development proposed in the coastal land use plan. Some deficiencies, however, have been identified as discussed in Section 9. Deficiencies in tho CIO sewage, water and drainage systems can be corrected most efficiently by capital Improvements which, in same cases, are already planned or under construction. With respect to the circulation system, capital Improvements are not nocesserily the most efficient means of Insuring (' adequate capacity for future traffic levels in the coastal zone. In addition to .1 providing for new ;.or extended streets where necessary the City.,!,also encourages more efficient use of existing streets through.traffic distribution i and Increased reliance on mass transit. The following policies emphasizaAhe City's commitment to Insuring adequate support facilities for new developments i • 1 t i ~i it f' t:ti t, 165»b. �n�f • M."v;�,}lir:<�.`•fEr. .., .'.i 'i.�t'....;%..z..::v.;•tS=ra.,:,•.-i-:,.'iir.�s� r .`'Y!"" }�+�e ,`t ti • l } t s 1 16. Promote the provision of adequate community facilities within the coastal zone. 16a. Prior to Issunnce `of a development entitlement, the City shall make the finding that adequate services (1.e., water, sewer, reads, etc.) can be provided to serve the proposed development, consistent with policies contained in the plan, at the time of. occupancy. 16b. Pursue funding for projects to correct existing deficiencies In community facility systems in the coastal zone. i 16c. Pursuant to the Balsa Chica linear park agreement, establish the conceptual alinnments for. Edwards - 38th Street - Ellis Avenue Garfield Avenue 16d. Emphasize the following corridors, with signing, to facilitate beach traffic. a i Bolan Chica Street to Warner Avenue to Pacific Coast t Highuyny.. I - Goldenwest Street Beach Boulevard Magnolia Street Brookhurat Street E 16e. Study alternative mechanisms for improving parking in Downtown. 16f. Determine the existing and potential -demand for public transit A service; at major destination. points within the' coastal* zone and l promote increased service through cooperation with d.C.T.D. 16g. In serving additional' recreational traffic demand, place primary . emphasis on facllitating public transit. 16h. Encourage the development of a transportation center in the coastal zone which will be: Located to serve local commuter and recreational traffic. ` Convenient to i:oncentratians of people. Sited to minimize adverse impacts on adjacent uses. �. aio0. fd-414 aiaa.:: { 166. *16 . Preserve the hecifIc Electric-1 right-of-waY parallel to Lake StrNQt wad-E E *within the coastal zone* as a transit corrlld�oCr.* *16k. Eneaurage"the' use ofz%parkini areas outside the>eoastel zone nfor passenger.!-cars• and the development of alternate transportation modes for beach users.* w + . qtw e • �r� *16L ..•.Wc,Nc;yitth•QCTD.for-the development, of a transportat Ion,center within the cosatai zone.* , 10.5.9 ADMINISTRATION • I Tha;; coastal; ,zone contain . resnurces and provides, opportunities 'Mr.:.many activities that serve'larger-than-local needs. In-provlding for these '!regional" I nedds, the City often incurs costs or negative impacts to the local communky. In some cases, areas of the coastal zone, such as the State beaches; are owned and/or operated by outside public agencies. The plans and projects of ; , 166-a. H�.M� '_w'7"�•«•'w.a . ♦Lh.r.t a.n.r w. a..q:t,r K►rCV;yC,li Y3::Iyta r.�•• - .w t 1�'+.}':Jar�+C.r.Y- •• `.1':.., ... •.5�.•.1.. .. , ..• a.... :•.{: ....w- �•j. 1„..•.v.4.��5:. . su.1S-.,.ryy:.,� { �'7'N�:Y l•1 �I jurisdictions outside of but adjacert to the coastal zone can also have significant impacts an coastal resources. The intent of the following policy Is to provide for formal cooperatirm among adjacent jurisdications and. other public agencies, whose actions may have significant Impacts on-coastal zone resources and planning efforts. Other coordination policies regarding specific coastal resources have been included in previous policy sections. 17. Establish a staff coordinatinq . committee of representatives from planning, public works and community services to coordinate and cooperate with adjacent jurisdictions.. and other ' public agencies..in developing and reviewing plans affecting the Huntington Beach coastal zone and adjaeent.araas. Such committee shall review plans and provide comments and recommendations for: Bolaa Chice • Huntington and Balsa Chica State Beach Santa Ans River Flood Control Project Other related projects 3 +r• _ - T. botj .- -Ia,Iiw;N. iJAdifl trG ta,pp tl + 1 j •.i 167. +t�.w.an+w.w+•.w+�_.. ...«..w•..a�waa->..rwr.wM•+r.su.,s.avti•l.:t'.'.:: .:,:. ... .'r '. .... .. . •... ...... .•r'.�. 1:1•.l..t•'.•�'.r.a.�%i:i'y..t....• ....-., ... -.. _.»,54'•.n,'t ;Il: rga:A' ' A Prri, •iC: C(1 SAVE THE 'NASA CII I%A H1:1j.Al,. FADN MARINA AIM WATERI' •Itir NONE M tlJ.&HI:tIT The coastal wetlands are tl:.s richout habitat in the state of California. suppurting care life than any other habitat of equal area. They provide crucial lifi support systems for five of California's eight endanqured eiwuirs of birder;//,�jj and also provide a nursery for nearl�i fifty percent of the narine oryaniunu having comereial and sporting significance. rurther, the coastal wetlands are feeding and resrinq habitats for approeisately seventy percent of thu birds a, L a 7 using the lacific Flpoay. S,I�'V, 4�RF•S In ad.)pting the Coastal Initiative (Proposition 20). the people or California declared than "The peraanent protection of the remAining natural end scenic resources of the coastal znne it a paraasount concern to present and future residents of.the state and the nation" and "It In the policy of the state to preserve, protect; and where poisible Co restore the resources of the coastal zone for the enjoyment of the carrent and succeeding generations." IN ORANGE AIM LDu ANGE'I.FS CoIAITIIS I.Ess THAN ?En PC caa or THE HISTORIC WMAIMS RMIN, AND TILE SOLSA CHICA I5 THE LARGEST OF TIIP.SE. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, URGE LodiL, cots Y, STATE. AND rtDLRAL ELEC U) REPPTSf UThTIVE5 r(AS WELL AS WTICIAW IN PdbLIC ACUICUS)'TO DIKIELOP PLANS FOR THE ACQUISITION, RP.STORA;'ION AIID PRLBERVATION Or THE WL5A CHICA UrrLAMDS, So THAT IT WILL FOREVER R_•.HAlli A UNIQUE ZCOLOGICAL IlLRITACE FOR ALL OF Tilt PEOPLE OF CALIrORIIIA. (Including Citz an 1 r • �{.D.HC.� t K � IJ FM/N /" �f�.� 2.. ft I JLJ A ! 3. 4. •2 yXew•t 5. c. Z&24L 8 /7 7. r-t 1"" —•—r— dud SAIZ , . . _shgo i 17 WOOL hNei &4 .CX--'1WAq ". 21. R 22. y4 . �yC.;r Rr •►d ctrcc� �'ay��M•� Y . 22. 24. / 25. •. rp A A, — p Iu;2 of the. bore potttioq: .� . ---'� (signed) Please return this covisted petition tot Dr. Peter Gruen, Proaident i Anigou da ho1Y-i Chica t ! J •� P.O. Hex 1561 . eo ���/ Cl Huntington CuLch, Ca. 92617 � .� .. .."'•.'.r•rva..M•nJ+•.r...f... ..•.. Y ..lR:.a...•. ...� .. •. .... ! .. .. •.. ,• .,. r ., rr .... ...a........... ....1 a...Na..r�Yr •` • . ... ) /-`1S't Wu, the undersigned renideats of 1iunjirrj'ton Uca41�, do hereby visa to lodge our formal objection to any dcva1vp3...eut i Man for downtown !luntington peach that c•xcucds a maxicua height limit of throe storiea. He enjoy. our life style here in Huntington Bunch and we would hate to sae that life style destroyed by high riva cyu sores, and resulting traffic crowding our streete and polluting our environment. (MUST Hft'•*. R89IAET";•OY HUHTINGTON BEACH AND OVER 7jtti AG6 OF It!)�. a( . ..,.... ,_..�( residing at �S Ftij M1u . .� Die 2. 1 , residing at q'Q1_.�r2 �'. ... 3.. residing at � '� �► . f; residing at .fj,(Io? residing at . U7� /fSTf residing at ljZa•xe�c�'. �`rS ` 7. residing at / � <v�F j� •{j r; 8. t residing at _!.,d•7 Ei„41"rlitr*'—.._C 01 9. residing at �';'7 / c,�c.t.. .c'.ri�». Or. 10. residing at 11. it gfuniding a 12• ; :....Ll.S1�:... Ku.ti �tr-.,is residing at 9_3=: /:t.0•_ .�,, � �.L�� 13_ y7;�, f,!•�t'�c residing at c71.. 7 '�Itrin•�fi t:+3,I,CC�i:r...:�'.'.i':.,. a...2•.�'!.:.;:=,�>:J1r� ..:41�s> •'.q,�..:. ,......�......,».....'. ,,;t'l,+i.rL...a..:.. !.tti_1^.tl:♦ ...t.v :.•...ta'n::+..'.-4'.a:s`f::"r:'.t:'r.'..Sc•ib�•�7.�T.��.i:'r raV•', !� I t, 4'•! BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTION . .r POSSIBLE DUE TO .:i 1 i 'AGE AND .CONDrFION ' lr OF ORIGINAL Dic :U M� _ opo 0 rx rt:r y. j:�iw%++�+ lTr3"s;.�'` «7n 4 er+.wa:l'.t.:����`F.1!"IY..T;!t'.;,•f"rv;x`e2'�,•tT•1'.i•�t',;�..r,�-'r�.r+z..rr.'�e.'��Zc.,.,N^r r"h t.a.R'f'�24Srrr47�1�"!`�'�.t�y�Tn r.. r _ yti� raj•[ ��';��� i �- S ka�r:tt;id 3 kz k'+ +' 1' l��S k l �' �-''�• i (+'}'r:• t z. �5..�'-�1"r'I r"t r,• / r•• �,r Y•Ser z fZ.7.z'.t.liy {!,1. 1 - 4'�arl J t`. ir:;1'\ t ri6�rrr�i�s min 1 i ORIGINAL, TEXT, . REVISYONS'.OR ADDITI OhS Page 139 policy 4a 4. Provide public accee. to cnastnl -m;xirces when pns';ihle. 40{41 Reglire an orier of dedication of on easement in all new devt-lopmcrtt to (311-3W 4a. Require an casunwr►t in all nr:w dcvelrprn(-*n: to allow :ccItlie verti_ul access to the shoreline or to pthlic reareatiort"areas or to pxbVc'1rsi:s l�1 and along the mean hir't tidr� litt.! or to pa)lir, recreation crxi hi�cevicys unless: to public trail:, and bikeways+)nlc:c;--.: Adequate access. exists nearby or is proposed by the land use plan vrit`hin 10DO �� - Adequate .-erces's c+x i:.;s ne:trlty or is pra,ns^d ht+ ilk fe=t; or KT W—n. .i;Ehinn rei37)n 4:1�.' t+i.f.itlr•f!; - Acccy at the sire vn u!d rc:scl: in unmitirnh:t• _ Access at the site wtrrld significantly degrade environmental!,+ s nsitive hnhita: impn_ts on areas designzted 'Cnn;ervatian" by the Qrea,, 2r f Elan; or Finding:. are: mach, consistent with Ser;i*n 30212 _ Findings are made, consistent with Section 30212 of the Coastsi Act lot Coastal Act that access i:. in-onsi.tent .with pearle! ecess is inconsistent with pehlic safety, militdrry security needs, or 2h3t militar.• security needs, nr that ngr iziIhere waj;C be ogricult'vre waved be adversely c1fercted, or advemly atfr_-ted, or { - The parcel is ton narroer far an adequate buffer The parcel is too narrow for an adequate pr ivaCJ buffer sepamlin3 ttse the lnternI acce:sway frr,rrt privnte are.! w.,AI.,+ occesswoy from the existing resider'ce and would therefore ed:•c:sel;r affect therefore adversely after-: the privacy of the property ownc;. privacy of the property"owner:, The following guidelines sltioll 'sc used in determining arlequate'privocy buffersi- There should be at leas. 15 feet-between Thetee exceptions shall root apply to the Pacific Elec:ric the existing residence and the side yard property firm_ for,an adequate buffer. Right-of-Way. - - These exceptions shall not apply to the Pacific Electric`right-of=Yay. +fib. Analyze the. irmpncct of current and projected' "recrentione Offers of dedication for vertical access in occordin:e with polity 4a sha'1 b= traffic on the City's circulation•system. provided only to study benches and recreation areas and its conjunction with dev-.lopm nt an vacant parcels;replacement of a xistin4 structurs or"in 4e~ Promote safe pedestrian access to the beach ferarn the intan--t" commerciaf'projcets."'. aide of Pacific Coast High W-.1y. (Z; Require an offer for dedicotion'of an easerss-nt is all new cr�et.�ment to c.1:,w 4d. lnitate cooperativelan pnirut efforts with the State Parses .-kM lateral occew along the'shoreline pth►lic recreation areas or to public traits ate: Recreation Department' and affect6d privat^ parties art:: bikewysurless: pursue funding to develop a pedestrian access p:aelrarn fmm ' Pescific Coast Ho" to the.beach in Lau- area from N.-th - Findings are rnad»consistent with Section 30212.01 the Coastal Act ttia2 access Street .north to the: southern wide of :etc GoIsa f:hica State is inconsistent with ptfilic safety, military sesarrity needs, or that agricultuc Beach parking lot. would be 0&ersel/ affected, or; Qi Establish a Signing .pMgr IM, which v�ii: "idemt f� gae"•:i': - Access at the site would significantly degrade a nviror:m�ttatty se•:sitive h.-a:ict~ acres.ways, bikeways, 'eect•cation areas and vista palate es:eas; 3r throughout the coastal wise. ., v. ♦ i ORYGMAL..TE7["i' RMSTOKS OR.ADDM'IONS . dL • CCWI NVATt81J . OF REV lS ED The parcel is too narrow for an adequate privacy buffer separating arse lateral oaxssway_from an existing residence." :The following guideline shail be used in _ determining odegnot_%privacy buffers.-There must be at least 15 feet between an existing Midence,patio cavcf.ar pow.ond rtre shoreiimi in order,to ' accvcs►cix+date bath an occessveW and thi privacy buffer. There exc, Mons&bolt�`. not apply to the Pacific Electric nigh!of-way: An offer of dec)cation for lateral access in occordonce with policy 4a sWI be c L rewired only in conjunction•with"new development on vacant parcels cnd;alcng- all sandy hexh areas: In existing:developed residential areas which-do not,,.. f front a sarv*beech area;oc— %"ill generally only be required where it can be 3 oceompGshed with the privocr�;cndards established above. Access to' he '- #; bulkhead Crass of tixiiiemgton H,z�our is generally not appropriate;becoise"ln. �y most crises it cormt.he provic'W consistent with privacy stcnMrds. Hrrweuer, there may t� situations where access to and airnq they hulkh:opt is aMropr;me. Where n parcel is_torge enaigh to provide public' access Consistent with the privacy standards in n•w'developrnent. access n1Wkj tl-%- l ulkho(�may$e- nppropriate,;partiailarly if public use areas such'as fishing piers cen be retched or pror:'sled in new development through such occess•yrrys. (3) In no case shall development in ony way diminish`or interfere with the puhliies right of access.to the sen vthere :r_quireci taro 1h use or Ienislntivp . �. culttu2ri7.ntiori. E4? The C;6,y shall acr_Cpt offers of rierlication for occ#-ss consist-nt Stith its ability to assirne maintennnce arvi.NnhiNty. ►f net acceptecl by thc-f:ily. offers of fedicntion far ns_cess"rnay he nccepteei by any other nuNlic ogencies or private cssoci►stion, provided that :ny nsc-Y.-intioR or agencv -:'-Zir*n pronnses to accept excessrJays must I)e nble to ns-wmr- maintenance rind operation of such ne"ssway prior to ope ninq it to the pu.5lic. t ' ORIGINALEyi- i3S OR 2 IlFFI`IrIONS sQVAtic ECUSYSTEtt: An area whwre.ergntsms grass or t;wr in ter- uatxr and tnurcct with eet!s Wh r. i rite atx.tty of crt woo to SWP**t ti%*V or Isms. Ate'. TUFFERs R Any of various devices ft*rW.fencin;w-vogttati ns)which srr-vr to sepwate adjacent Iaad usys in vrbr _ to lesmen any mNerse impacts of ana Jard#&w en.another. Raytve we?jand t SS� +I:ITKl I?Cf rFFrtetiatt ott tJ'Mcfer :r'^• s arced mteMement of a nctarol resource 14 priewnt esploltation.destruction o•neVect. � �� � 'x; rrx cowl iGE. CY PI..SSiNfYC: »- . , Planning for ewnix that ars of p7Wble t:+:wxertain accvrtenra. ' • ECOLOGICAL RMRt't5: Offtcialty determined area aetruJ prrsme7 far its trrvironrnenial value. ; t 'u a' rho complex of a commu+ity and its envi-inment functicning as a unit to narwe. T. ar -rr Etiti'JH0%.%1EvTALLY SESSITIYE HASITAr: Any area In which plait or anhmat Ilfe or their.habitats aye rare or espe+cielty valuable and w.-ttich coded be ensily disturbed or drgrodt d by human oetivilles and de elopmemM " ? r. FILL: r • - ,• An) errth or any other s�teasionce�material placed In r.:brrr,rrged extra. hto piac or t.,1,4A or site rises o plant rr ar:imaJ naturally lives cr:d gror•s. ;Pecies Which c�c rep^eserttative of a.per�jic area"or t�abitae. T7 take jnrftdictiars a+.av frnrrt an eristirxj agency or entity. { •� TJAAL FLGSII.'*G •• A process in which normal tidat action results in continual exchange of ocecct n►st*.r witlJn a w-rttcrxt. Land who the water taUx is at. riiw. a'.above the turn. strfact tong enrk:Qh to promote thr �G:..'�;•�,w �-M• �. jtsmattcn of wet sous or to sr:ppezK.thtQ growth of salt resiltCst:marsh plants. '•^'I%'' "..{.-�..i4 i-•Y.?=< �-"' J•�. '� ate'• {f L - ►.-.;r.•. - Y_. • _.•�•s ••i T.. . r��1��y`✓ ''•''4 �'�'ti="""L:•! ,r• �. �+�+•�T'-al. •e.>R - - - �•1%� :,=�...Fs.:s'�.r.- -y+ ,-+.�:'q'r•.. r�i ...,,�• ��- •r -t"'-a'"^••r-,' .ns-'` - M« :y..+ .i, .-.�.•y-, �dx.c�i•'`. K��`� � r - - "r• - ..� -,.3"� .ram Y v ...•<i r': -' ,. - ,ro•:r•.-si% - •i. •r-r- •: >r:i^^ ....•+r ••1F�'-!};'`' .C. ,.. �.r-ate'.«..-��.i :tr:•. -�i. :,s-:• � -ar"`--.- ' - '''.'-�x-=' - ,i. •;i�...r �'�` "aT- - ,.i•- �.',,. Y': .FES+ e� �r'..:•�Z'�" ..�+ra� _ _ .w :.�`•.r +tau r Y' .•� t r+ ,..• r- .•.r�� ate' '`� �f'��y _,�i+� r.,c .A.: 7" .1i _ �y '.••.�.n_ '1 ,,y• _ Ei'-r•"y-x. "ate r•r•. vY Y T^Y• aJ r f � •t �T • r t J�r� - s f"' i '•ram: r.�-• X'.•,-, _ •r?',eta" z .R tJ �r •aC:_ - rrray ary+•• '�' 'f'� =..tom•?i.• Yam' +-e .�a'� 3•. Vr':a V �F=n a +-Al M 1 A uY r+ Y4. •Y' 1�s.r - -.x t_ � gq, - -Yr •fir •'ii+-'.t� �•J - •:�'�� to a+'P - -R :Y _ �_•i• N _ i - 1.. - '•'tic -..�•c yr s y -r. ��wi�' -f 'r ar-�•-�; •`,:r. "ter�. �-.,. .f ra _ r ^•sr� - +c"4" s "=r v< s x s- tir--� •rs- .�'j•- r a �'i'��':, w ,r r=?+' sr'a r;,�- Y..:' ..t'a ..•'a-. - - .s'•e y+r -Psi.,,,. _ �«.� `•�a• ,:�...•..,r.r.".4.i�.,-�•'+ :.. �+r .-��.c: `:..-l_'-..;.'.. .:.=.y(•, :.w:s� __ _ .._�..•.r. •'I.- =at-.'?. ,...•�3-.•::1:^:"-,.%i_...--..•...•.. .-..�..•-•%..L,.�-..,'..•=. - . � � �it� � a • •• • • ! • • h ••• ♦ • ! ► iI- • •„V�1��'c'`i'�1�� � -•�•.�—� 7��y ¢�..-.as' • • • t • 1 • • r� •':M � � • i•- •1 �� - 1� .+ •L ♦ -•.r�L7il[d., •"wr`y,-W�t� .£faNw { ,R .- f .�•p t'�• ' � ♦' a• +r' `'�;�• a a•. .a f. • • � • ..•. • • • •:►.•• • • r _j, t'y'•rc.. .+ ( �t "c 'C:'4'r ..+- �"-"''yrr. r 9'.1` - :r c ,'" • s ♦. • ? < � ,�},�.,.* Z f,.� may-,'" •e _ r"" �3i`�� 4t- *'L�-w«�.sa"r�,^ � �qr-.i y��_..•'.-'--�-��_' ,�.....` r+� ♦ • e• .., • • • •- •♦� • fyw' „�4 ` it'�.,+h',".;.i., '+�" ..�r*liS".•�•.„'•�.'�h a.•' .'art`-� `�. ,..c jl r� S .� �����•` a '�' •'•��f•ieS •.s•.•-',•t,.'•`� ��� J•. �'�-`Y "-x • ►• • • r r r-• • • ► • • • • • • r - •; a. '' » �" ���-.a,.� � �'�.er tr�+iN�,i;fsY''-,,� _���.,�_-,a-�-z. F"" _- • t ! r S • • 3. • • • •. t • .�. - - �°••,P .�••"k'.�••i""�'2+� r�r '�+.�.' t,•4•�+.r-N f :� tom'''„. r�- ^, �yy... ^�+. ��'� ^fi3�+..T`;�vl =-•emu--�.",r�•�._3.� s' .�•�Ti'�,•rt�t [• -�•'c '__.Fr.. `r,�•G y?c �J ��� y-.�•t_--•s r -yam --Y' •. •• r - • a i* ����� . s-,� �,��+ �'rr���.�.fir:r"�w�,��.�;_-*K `�� � �r.� ! • • • •s • +-ts��y,..'•l•'��.��, h': _�y..,:�'P•+T•S ic+-,t__.r -?"'~ ...i ysC�'-..-�„�'+'Z'K'"•.�'r='-" • '• •• »� - ���r'♦« ;�.-�.1�*,�iC„`ry k �►�►. r'�.,r,�i�'"�`!��'•tr-f = y. fix. j���� .�.�� ~rr s. ir't•� Sr'�� � -.. .T.z>!- "1`++rj""r`"'� -'`- ��`� � - t • �!.• y�� rs ► r'� r1••4,.2'�� � .�v'�-rc�� :�`�'sX"`�•��'�r��.a�'s. �a`'� • I • • s r • • • ;w ,�r•., �•�`d.�.t-- "" ; '-`+r�.�..Yis_�3�S rtti�'� ���• �7.%�a�='`'arx_'-_�i�"� t • • • r• � �. 4,z�./^�j����`^�3•?�� r.' .•,;.1►�'rC ',..�"" _.�+-'- „i�..�_rr�/ {r.� � ��� r �f4f�'�- �•`��ay'��••+°'vt-'_ .'' � ice• •j'.•F'`'E�1'`• r-•�.-•r.� fi �1C l yT. f� ` Y a.! a • i • •s .�Ts �- wy,�r ',� ;`.r�rfi�alY'��5. r �++��'..=-+• PWIVI G. �mil'!+'. a,a.-+'` ^► ,f`*,.w--..:•„'�'r`j"�.�t�`L"'�.tiJE�� � 1' `,- +�* .� .rtz,-�`k' .r „gif •-i� r�.T•r c '.�_'- �.• e e a ♦ • . a -' '" Y'... �"•.. K �Xc r«�4.•�} ` �'.k.rt�uir.��"•=,ti.-ir�^"- i'�.-w�ir ''•�,,., �'T� • • • `".. aR`iL.:��r_� '?�.,y• " j.:- .r=- • • ■ • • • ♦ .''° rr v-<;�*� �d+''k r .��' '',;-i.�,.•,e._Fes•,��r�'-��`S�'� �' � f �ef,.i1i 4.�v��•t�r''t'.:t• 4, ,..h+ �.µ�s'`}�"'_ '��t-•r��j'::''r ���'r y f- "r �J r • • • r • T',�i�e'�" r` �y �% •asp.""`� - it•' '"��z.c1'�r`�".tS�^`��-i��`" '.• �.` -r. - i sa'r s ♦ •• • F�-. _.>1`<w�E'�-�.�� r '+ rrts!a'��-rt`'�,:.-•��"'ix"'.'w�y.sr^tf� ...�r:��,.-`.f. , I-'.:'' ''�.: '��� ,• '«•:'...y- � ,s '3�`�.+'L + .�r�-•t._+�'4�4""sf+J�.����. � -r .� ♦a f 5as rr sjr+• � • ,.� r t.+-;t - r _—"•,r,b rt�+.�r�e.�'i..""` i,F�")j-�,"'�.: ^� � n��v.2r_.=i sGZ '1'>r3t� REV7rSLONS rut •ADDiTIOYS - e Page 144,Policy 90 ": w Approve only thot development odj::--nt to wetlonds and environrnentnlly sensitive . . . r9b. Requine w only that rfn,.elnQmpnt adjacent to %�riL'trsts tyat r1a?s :+ot' habitat are=thot.does not_significantly-degrefthohitat vetoes cad which is �r- ty imp:�ct habitat va;er;s Compotible with'thecontirxtance of the habitat. new c evelopment e�tiquaus to +attand. areas L's include v4bich will consist of twe or more of t►we faltawits4: Par, 144r Policy SbRe quire new development contiguos to wettand or"Mmisitit holly sensitive hehito no hurrtred foot setback from the edge a. the wetland areas to include buffers which will consist of o minimum of ax lvxrked foot sethc i::fra� except alanq Pacifi`'Oanst Highwuy. She larxiwotd ecige`of:the vretiand widee sensible.-tf exist:rg dewc?�xncY•�t or site ,' . - A vbually attractive barrier Umt' timits P.'•rys:cal, +.nut: not. tor:figur+atiart prechidrs o 100 foot buffer, the. buffer u`botl be estahlishe-r:acconiioq to t.`te.� �.. visual. access factors listed in Potkiy-9C and s.'�all'be reviewed by the truest of Fish and Cane. ' Difference in elevation suffi6ent to Meter arcess. In case of s�stanV'ol devel ent or significantly increese..•l humcn i -' 9c. t3cveirm rpecifications 'or buffers arnurxf wetland nr=s. ° 9th• mpaoli a wider r - buffer mar he r�uired iri acccrrcic�ce�+►i th an analysis-of the factors in policy 9c. --�:� _ •�:-' dl5e. a 4 l Cam$ Page 1 IA,Policy 9c � Develop specifications for buffers taking into consideration the follmvirx3 factors: s' Biological Significance of A�j�x:ertt Larx+s. The he,ffer slxx:lst hr•�,ffici^ntly wide to rotect the functional relationship between wetlogd and adjacent fond. Sensitivity of Species to Disturbcnce. The buffer should be s+iffici•_ntlie wide to ensure that the mosl'sensitive_a' spet:ies-•vill not be disturbed signiMi anNy by permi,ted development, '3vsed on hriaital refiremr.-tlts of botit resident ind !n;;ratury sus-;cics an the short-'and long-ferret adaptcbility of various species to fume^ divurbunce- 5uscep'ability of Peicet to Erosion. The buffer shaiki be sufficirnil f :virle to allow foe interee-ption of any additiunol Mn,_riai e:rodr-J as a result of ,;�e prop.-ised z ; developrncnt:hosed on soil and ;ieUelct;'e characteristics, stone rind rur:off chorncteristict, atal irnpsrviovs'slrfcr_(: eovertige. Use of Existing.Cult�lrol Features to Locate 3erffer Zones. V.he-e: development shouldbe lrtc016d on the side of roads, dikes, irriutitiun c::ncls, flood control charuzeis,etc:; cm-ay fror6 the environai4ntally sensitive hahitot area. i r �.��. _ =r_.� ---•fir _• �'►�'Ad+"s'.__.t�*,�lxs�..:.�:,..r'.. :�..sl.rw.r..�aii�ria �s-. _;,,.: •ram. t -.;ye+�;�..�:y �.,a•r..� M. 3Z OAS CR OfS :r +!r. N+ `.fir✓ ... a :f4., • .. , .'~_ �. �Y •�%..1.• _ r,r i - ��' • _ - , a '9C. Eraabllsh.a pence-lum is nntify St ntr, and Federal t�+!'tcir;•. h.-av,t.3 regulatory authority in wetlnryls and nther emirrstmpntal:r . sen.itive habitatsawhen'development projects in and adjacent to Ada Page 144,Policy'ge .; ,.. surh areas ao slibmitted to the City. MOTHOW Prohibit fill;in�Y wetland areas for the purpose of road cono=llon, except fat Although excluded from urbm.&reloprax-n4 vxtbM areas can be of vakse to.. reads required to serve uses allowed in weticud3 pursumt to and ctatsisttrtt:yrith the City by providing 3k]nirxant viscsal arir! recreational amenities to tt'rr :oc.-+t Section:3E326Q-3t?26 'for coostat *.ztt�d t rglr uses:' ALct, if a pro-ct.�ces cnmrr»nitr Hmvever, the wattands_ in', HmUngt n Beach . will, require qpmed pursumt to.arrd consistent with Section 3OZ33(c)�C3j;and a.roan wm part of improvements hetare their potential is realized.-11-he,following p3l;cias arovide the approved projoct such rood would his omitted in Y a gate far erhanci the biol ical and zesttietic u ntet of these Area» R port:ins of ttit severely►, Strategy 'ng oq q Y de�radexl wetlacid where de+relgxnent.Js•ptrn -itted, Any rands 4avemed try this policy. _ C_ shall be Giinited to'necesso y'ccccas roads apperrtmMt.to the facility, and shalt be 10. Promote the imDavvement of the-bioiogical productivity and amearan e permitted chly`:wheae there is r+o fcaiible less envirbnMientally d=oging alternative of wetland habitats.` and mere feasibility iWtigation measures have been' rwj&d: •��' , toy Promntie the reestablishment of tidal flushing in wetand areas.. 10h. Promote the participation of. County. State arai federal mqencies �•� in the enliancement :nnd'maintenan a of Pnviranmenulty 2 nsitive ' y h:n'r;Mts by' actively pursuing fr»rtiml firm the r'�lifoi7lia rm:ial• � f•nnsr�rvarx-y --in-1 nther Stit+: and redcr:nl agnn;-i•Ts ter rMve!;np az0 +... -. maintnin lent`!-.rancrf buffer areas arrnrnd t.hn rri?n of the wett•in-i - • - jl is .fin ���'�'�' � � t w.� Y•', ��v� � - x .Y..�„_{-S•i- fib+;. • •• /.! 1 • •a •.a ti•' 1-�-, ✓- � . f t, r►. ✓."i7 L,.1S.�"v,=.'y.'4' ..tr "'_ t ,ti • • r, • s • . .. • .• f. SK' !Y.r.;r`O'" ♦ar:' }_ 1i'• "K � `.-N..� <� r 1 _ a ♦ • '`+`..•, p .tr'.� •r �...5,.. .oc5"'t� ; �,.s'.-:ff.- '�`,y, .�`�`. I}•,Cx.+•�„ _ _ � _ • � '•. • • •- • •♦ .J � ia��,.r'7,��e`�`r'?�L� - _� 7r .'r"�Y.."r��jyiT'.?� �y}� S} �} Tf-� tf.r �r � �- - - r'� '.► _ <• e- ..•.. r • • _- •. •. • • ♦ .•."'ji!C�r�`,.,S.f 5h.4+w ��t -a�•tsJ _.. #- y,a r-� .y 4 •�dy' �i.+' .i :+♦, ryt Y`� • ♦ -• s 1 �• • • . a. r ^�• 'h+ .. ♦� r'r tyY v _!«, r sC i '7E+�-.� a.-- �,- 'rrn�� � 1 -.�'.� !� v. r _ is J ��.� r-:'r �5•.•-�'4•L. • -a"<.�. -f.,- ,} ME � •�r^,'. '1.�•�^ �d' '� �'� �'t • • �. ~f•. • �7 •^•f • •� +f • 1� •• • •1 1r •i • .as•at , ♦ •.•ice • �Y „i �%:_: Y"?n..���•sl�h s t _ _��` x _�!�'Y �"y r! � r = -,r''r•. • • • c-r- • • •. • • • •` r• • •. • �• � y a + ' j} vi:•♦" • • • r• • • • • • • w •a. `;-. "r'��sd .a' r �'.tJ�;ESe;•,�.w� • • .r •,,.,.�: ' r y'.:"t .''^..-: -Y.r -. -� �• • • •: ♦ • • • • 1 ,SF J IL ea - +.,, x�;,,,r:t' 3 yam, Y�r�Y r'c �r. � '-_ {• _. 1 •• r • ••• • • • • ,• fir+. "` ••r!`,+s. r,T'r�r _ x `�e: tom..- � , � " -i _ �•• • • • a. •► � • • �.�r .} I ' 'ta,A, ..�.•�r , - j r .. • tar v fy_ • ✓- t Nt ` a • t • f • • t Not firdA�1#10khTo • • • • �.�y a ..lf •� •♦ �.«.s .�.: :�• ; F is q - ' .� �•`� • _ "' • •` '� '' Fw S'`:tom 1„•'• • 'r r.� .•,_ • r • ��• f � rat" {g- ? .r ..r-s'+,�� ♦ '��5. 3 1 �,.. ' �~ r� `` '� �r `+�'� i. s '? '� r^;�...�'�* ..�,. �: _ `� �_ tea'• �4 • ,.�y�/{ri sir y7�• a" f s.�7*�:.lf:.. 1'� '• .� � .,�, �'� ti I "Z" Camri ercial Cnmrnerr,ial rises in- the coastaI,znne are of two types: rjcneml. facilities for Page !I! Add toVisitor-serving paragraph s " the community and the city as a"wble and more specilized uses o:ient to visitors to the coast." Cfftce aM residential uses shall be conditiaml only.and shall only be pe=tied if viisitoc serving.t s iarc either provided prier to other develasunent or assured as part In order to guide the orderly_developriient ofliotti local :and vi3itor-ce7manerciai of the&velopimit. Na olfice.oF residentizi uses sal-3e 'r uses, the-fallowingdes nations are utilized in'thfe coastal{Masi. - pnitted in a7±► visitor-serving designatiah seaw.aid of Patif c'Coast 1-fighway. General - The general., ctirrsrrerc1al-=.. designation allows convenience. ' In visitor-serer - ncighborhood;_' and community.a4iented' retail. and bsssinew., centem`- While carsrnercta! development the street level a. Me-third of the totid these centers'vs Itt.rxrrr)bcr size, ancd co they era intended W serve �lO°r areo sho!! be w meted to nisi tor-serving comae cl c-sex however at least 513 rY . e, rrlp�itia), t $ ; percent of�the street level shall be visitor-serving convnercial. - the er-ryday, stropping-needs of permanent residents of an area. f In thee+ent of a consolidation of a minirnum one block area, condiNand uses may b= Visitor-Servinq : The-visitor-serving cam-nercial category is-a new desir�:intien located in.separeste structures or.on separate portions of the parcel in the context o: cre.:Zed •in response ter the Coastal Act policy which encourx3� adequate � -. a planted development, Frovided no less thfln one third of the;totd.floor area visitor-srrvinq facilities in Ahe�coastal area. The principal permitted'ums"are permitted'is'dcvoted to visitor-serving uses,and provided that su6stontiQ! public hotels, motels, restaura its; theaters,--rnusetims. .specialty ar�rd`,hr+.aCi-related retail, arl�i sxrrvice.us+r:s. . f�ffice:and,residential uses'woulyd a1sn� be allo►Yesf by space�pedestrion occess amenities�are provided to rnointain a pretlorninanHy special permit. These_usez"are-located near, visiting-drawingun nitractis-such visitor-servi6q orientation:' as Vie 'Ain icipal Pier' anti :he beaches, and alnng ma;nr access rcut.s-from inland areas.'; T la -3 Mixer! Use w The 'Lanz! Use Elgment of the City's. Cenerai Plan inclur3esi a broad -nixed' development category intended to encriur.-:ge maxirivim fle+cibiNty. The Constzl rfernent luw; r-fined' the category to provide mire_ d.-rection for the type . aryl level of dc'elnj�ment desired.` T:va new mixfA usp r.,go:�ics :)nve lv.-en develop-d for the=coastal zone. office/P•r:�ide'ntial --..T.`xr intent of ihis'ds.ignation is tr, alimv a mix 0 inert-urr. �- tn high density.'a artments-and condominiums with professinnni office smce. •`• �a�.� This can b^ accomplished,by int�ntlN re-side'ntinl and afficc us^. »iih:r ihn :.:erne rjeneral.area or by vertically_'mixiriq.tiier�e"us-:s wiLhin I.-Ij1din j, Limited anr.illary retail_.commercial."and. service uws arc alm cmx3ition-Wv nllrlwed;however, the emphasis i" on the officelresidential mix. • In an. urban . center; offices .arid ' resirierx:es, are ., com{�atible dies which complement' each' other. In'the,po►vntown, in'ensj fied residential' uvrs vvculrf prnvide hntr:sing close to ernploy,ment-and add stsppnrt: fr3r phinnr'lf gen:!nif nrui - vi;itrtr cn,nnicri:tal. The. t;fflCe:: :Int�ld print r't^_ 1'trfrw - ta the r:::irlential Lonirnin)ity- ' 1 1 �# �/ S • l l l F ��� ; ' � 4} .4 ,f T � ,� 1 � •S !�',, �Sri -., • 't' 1 ,lt-ll 'ff r 1 1 1 { 'r i IIXt ', • �� 71 r—7. � .�Li'�yR• .. F_ o , a .. t' y d n.F tf : f • , " E j .f rr t l� it is ., •+ - t+i. • ammirw ANN t L ( , 1 �:--�.�-.�;'.- - <':,;;_ . . - , _ 6�ld114 �; : : - _ _ ' , , -- - ��tJi� t>Ilt ADiI►IT7[t�ILS . .- . - . A six-story height limit has been applied :to the entire Sixtti to Lake Street are;; as a rnennz of encouraging Vie pwvisinn of.amenities am-1 recycling of existing-uses, as well as alloying Um p+r=ibility,for vertu } mixeA uses within individual dt:velopments and pmvitiirog opprxttsnity for ocean views. Add to Page t31; paogrqh 5.- 4di=ussion of City property at Beach and PCHI LAKE STREET TO BEACH BCULEVARO The north - tip of tWs'area has been§MLqngSd Residenti - Portion ofahis of has been-desigrwted sf COMMercialfS1�pco!Recreatf;s:::Devvelopment This area encompasseses ;spproxcrstaisly . 260 asses. pxirnsiing . snland to shoal be ixnittt only overall.devetoprneirl`'ptarr ands f::ct lo.t� . , '-rtianapolis Avenue at point:, The '98.acre area ciurth of Atlanta Avenue is followingrr co"tions< Clmost completely developed with. a mixture of single family and. small (rttcett.��t69'f"- •; _ . multi-family uses. The overall density of this area falls into the merO rn A snoop wetland iZrea has pselimir�erily mapped by'the Depcxtmti%t of Fish'and Gams 1 density range; therefore the entire area north of A[l3nt:s -Avtxutx nos been on this property Prior permitting any development of this parcel, the City wilt require designatad as rnedium density resldential. the submimh6n of.f aphis,`vegetation, and soils information idertif r the extent of arty®oeoo itag.':.att The information shall.be prepared by queerlified profeuional, and ;. The area south of Atlanta .Avenue encompa=s a total'amen -of 162 acres.. shall be subjtxt.to"review by the CQlifo=nia Department of Fish and Como'. If the wetland consisting. of existing rrwbiie hone• park;,, hotels, a golf course, a new is determined by the Deportment of Fish and Come to be severely;iegroded pur3rrotYf to y� ~ condotnini�lm dr_velnam t, rmd a large vacant area with oil pmductiw. The. Secticm'30233 end 3041 l of the Coostel:Act c r if it is less than one acre in site;atl~cr coastal faryl u7; pl-in dpsigmites nearly 90 acm.s of this area to residential restoration options may be undertaken, pursuant to the Coastal Commissioa's.'Stotewide uses, lnterpreNve Cu'delines for Wetlands and other We Environmentally Sensitive Habitat � Areas" -Conservation easements;dedicaticals or other similar mechciisnzs shall be 'd f Approxiinntely 10 acres of the area south of AtlanUt Avenge on the east %Me required over all wetland areas as o condition of development, to assure permcnent of take Street has born <fa:ign.-rted for visitor-serving commercial tizir.. A prote:tiori.' Public vehicular traffic'shirll by prohibited in wetland areas governed by the nortinn of LhIa area it vacant, and the portion along Pacific t'aaat .-liglrxray conservation easement. Specific-druinoge,and erosion control requirements shall be ~ support: a mstreurrnt and hotil. This visitor-serving' area 6' intended to r,orporated into fhepro,,ect design to e'nswe that wetland areas are not adversely nrot ide additional area for visitor-sewing uses oriented to Lake Street -IrKI affected. t•Io further subdivision of cmy parcel shall be permitted which would have :he gay rr_t us a buftnr bettivicen possible sic-jtary�devoluponent ncr>? La!:r Street effect of dividing off environrrier►toily sensitive habitat from other portions of such and the residential ama. Sotli the residential :end visitor-w:+ing cornmar,:ia! parcels for.which urban uses ore permitted in the LU? until s��ch tune ,ci;-the Permanent areas carry tSree- story height limit« otectian`of4he`wetiC' assuyred. The t,2 :r::r•e a:yea Inr:ated Iv^tvnsen meta:vary Street and r3cacl� A01it 4! a-J oeried by tleo; :ity of Hurrrinrltur: 3cach arxi.leascd-to the IA. c-I:in;:ern ?Tc:tc'z inn ant} Driftvrrcirf Mabile Ho!nr- Park anti' Golf mural. Thb area I au dnigwlted as 1:0mrnerci3t support recreatiGn to rettect exi:,tirg uses ar..i as z ! potential f+there site of a majir cninmemiallrecreatinnal davelwncr.t to comnlr:;u,al. the City O-meh- No height !irnit" is-applied to this•3re;a. i.y6 4 i-� '".•-`''"' -..:� SZ GR UPS-Y-. E - '•i' ..yy'';t'�i-�:� -.^�:i• t" s' : .. ., ... - A ._. "~'..�,�_�r r�.rr err. rrr,.�!#�..'"r- .. 'r.` `w - t a COASTAL LAND USE PLAN 60LBENWEST'"STREET'°TO BEACH BOULEVARD Acid the following flax area ratios to Figure 10.8 Pam.[28:- 3.0 for Ge•�west to Sixth Streets 6.0 for Stith to Lace and Huntington to 86=fL- - (6 stories)=� MEDIUM:� � .�•- ' {8 acres} ,�, =., D a* TT� RESIDENTIAL: (3 s Lo:ies) OFFICE/ acres) _ RESIDENTIAL-- R (6 stories) '' (43 acres) '' 4 V:aITOR- NIT. VISITOR- VZSI:' G?I{Y/ r'r:%StE:;CI A.*. f 5_aV?tiG DEAVSI'£Y SERVING S i?viNG- DENSITYJ::c�i'^RT C0-,jmERCI.AL RESIDZtiTIAL*% CO.1114MERCIAL' COX.14ERCIAL RE:5TDFN?IAL RECREATION (3 acres) (3 stories) '* (4 acres), (b stories)"" (3 stories)' (34..acres) 4'1�tLs�.O (45 acres)- ` Vri4Qs7,Q (:33 acres) (47 acres) . Ait%&b ` 1FA ma}o y t. N, " R . . .� T ..{ r ••• .fit t. L� • _ IGi: '£ .S � ? OPTION O.:L't l��i_:a�. :.Er.,.. G`:.� . ... � i'... .. ,... . "S_.E PAGE 43 FOR CLARIFICATION OF ?iEZGFiT r• r• f'S`4Y,,t'�i ili '�, k`. � $ � �S�1 \',�#�f+!�'13' �� f�i�l � �II`;rf l+ '�t k� ,;'hr� '4 w,, '?:,S,l`•, Ya f''��� b,i.4�� ��� � +rA t $+ '1 ��'t �S�n �# . k �'� �' ,�!� t j� !i a• �, s w�«S ;1'tl }f ^t,, t � �,,. c; �? ft�yi�.• '�J. .�� srl Y� k ` ��T6� t i•��i�" � {Ti r �. t{��i��l,� '{�.a 'w {� ,i�.1}�� ���� � �.• � 11��-` J 1` /� ,t��I' � �'�• �_� " •• } � J� rki•lrrf, .�� pli, r�I ' 3''•; 'rt ,f � �11tK � . rl `�,�}�t�° '�.tt4_ p°;.� t • �'Y t� �,c1! r 1 1 ,�y .� t� f iJ ,�, �.1 i �' �1 f� '��'� "�' � � � `f {j,J��I���}r• �` T �1. '�;'+.E1} A�` ��i r � t� � t � �1+ � 4 � 1'� ��,} 17• ��� k�� 1 , t ' 'f Y 'h:+''t� �, A 7..;���r t1t r r�.{lll,�+�yyy+�I} � � � '� J� y ,r.�•j}K' ,i41}Sit t�t •, '� �4+, �: � r�� L�.,� �f t .�i`",nY.. w ,r •��r, � ,1i"iJ.S'ir. Y '� Jt: �:.1`.3tQ}. A .1 3 ,.'� ., h Jriio,• � r ! Y. !� yy ����yy •[(t • i' tk , }4:r1 r I i . ♦ ' I 1 I r r A " 7 / r J i 1 � r f' r r v� Jr a' r +r i� i. ji �a t , I>;I. � r+ + •'� L I* � J.r�r f ,•l. 4 i s, ry :f•,'�'/,; F'; Ir r'` f -,�' 1 + ++ t 4 l :. �Y�Sl._ , ... !1 � ' � �."1 '�� h ��,%! �MA r 1��ff' r� �,. r}rl r �• r• , ' ` % + � � .,tF 1 •► yr Y Q t .,.,- t . �r., t V � L }. 7 t11 r '. r i.. �, +{• r . �t( J ��//�{7 t M1 , r7 ff�• , .,, _lr w,,, - +kr .A { rt' r h _.` ,,.� )I+7:t � {1'1 "tJ I,� • f FI�Si.•'�141. ;.•. 1 r+ ~.• � 4 � ,•4 C/1 1 + �1�4+�'. �/�'I h, 14 t F ii r �. • hj t.• ,fit. 5 �Je'a 1 1 1 •r�+ /1'w j' 1+ T' Tt's41 x� •,( � r, i y . v. ,. •- -r ` qtll J �" 'r µ r: Y .�jt a fi•tl +l a� ,t��,�raf t�^`t�'rr' �w. v,,• {( t' •.�! r.Cr�-��,, ylr .r c.t �1 ,• r.i r � 'Y.� � '.ri� `.. �� '...�,�+�+�,'�117 4:A;�.��t�r )��•-.•, ` 4.♦, 1 Iti I•.��+ iT tip',. '� 7 .+j Y,,1t �.'. 1�fr+ �'1'��� '.tw 1 ,.r ��1� :i,lira t `t � �i ct � �+'f\ny,Y ,s}�• _ • :�'K '{ t� t.1'f 't� X •,•h" , i. 1 `�• ,l+f L 9 } � a r �' •����,� E .r4 t�'•C,1 )' ''{ '!` 1 yll � � '�4 17w '� � 4 � th t+ ffy+! r11`, � 1' ' `� l�' it � � Y ' •.+' y�j"IS�j' ' �.t1\♦`h �v t h 4: :r '1 �•t[ ;,1� v f t\ �J�^!! {�,t1st`!y' � i!1 �1�,..• �� .��,,r+, . ! J�' � I }�t'S y t }�t+ •'IK� ? r � t�• 4 r � ,Y�4 �;��rt+i.� �,,�.L tt.Yfl:.L}� ,��r *YZI 15 Y,{ , 7.L.. {� ',� +.r 1r}.:� }t rh Yr j r�• � t l .�dnRYt )� ) i ° r1 xis '�i+ )�• �} y r 1 y �tl• 1 { . 1�,. qT�4 S S f Y\', l t.� M r A . S 1 y��,•.5:'�" �,.!�ysyt-+. t.411f'�tl'11'' C"'''. p ,`,1( rAhr�, '; •R ��r.." tlu `•� ♦ ,�{ _ {� . t{ T�� r 7 yr ( i 1.i� � t f,r+, �',t+. �+ C`'! t ) f k;� �•1 t i'�-, t 7 k � 1� �1 t • a+,, �+•t' ` .�Ifrl,llj A� }r h + .ltl r 1 '! " t• tSI Yl�{{�, 4t. t . li` r FI,Y� tM .'�„' '!r,'1r, 7 \ 1�'�! 4%1{r If ` i�,IY,R •R` t• ,6 r �h� r •* `r 4 1'r'�• �y 4� t+J,itr wt:,r,lq. (t'rd,�.,Ar .�t11`i rr Y'$,�}• h»,i`� Y� �• ltf� 1� `�'ti! �''nrf�,'�YI}!S"•`%�q'.�1�; �•�(��r�..l:ti•�•g1�+r�M �"tl, I tl,")tl '' l..T.'. 3 7A;i 4 '�w� 3 Nr41 ff`� • � { � '� } s , JJi .. H tM., ,.�r'� �_"' i =.r t �,� '� +ta• � 1 � �� �FI•� ''�{t4t ,9LI11�,1 5 � ij�� S�K:.`- tt ! rt i� `1 � +�4 •) + f `t(7' � ')a �tr'l,li 'f I. +�t�i �t�„`rt' t,_��� ti ��x _, S Jr�� f .J��ti�r � ti:,,�k�fifi t�• Y�'.; Y� ! 'iM '{� � "� ,ft. t +tr 1}�y h � ( 1 j a t (k�r• 4..•f"j �—'��w "h r: ? } ., r i y ti�'. tj Ilt'�� f + ;+ t. �} ' � u t t.. �•,;�. { � 4. Y {,�, �«Stt.•�i!-,{rtl {` �„ T r�d t�• k l t.t t 4,riit } r� + 1Iti J ,A't r���jYr 4 !_,+4 r Yf'� �,��,£�� + bAk�•tJ 1t'' w41j �e� i }>I �f � �4 , � 4 �� � � ht1, a ✓' 'Lr � ' ,4r Sa`�I�i' t ty� � '�� * ,I�i ► �.r ,f'Yrttlll.��ty.'."a�"��, h �' ht• : { x •r 4 it �,' � � �' `��'! eCr r Ytt'r, 1 t tit,+l.wrf, 4l� �4 ; �1 �,t' '�� ,Y••' 1 'rJ' '1 � 7;� �1�� t� rY•`��r PJs�S�{ I��. R �� y �' �+i��T k� H,,j� ` r px-r • I'�•{y h,„�i '.► 4 iA1.'. .} �, !' 44 l V '� . f ;�1 1k,Y"4 � f1� °�� • r ��J,� •C`Q` A fl 1 1, 5 �' ♦- .1 S • i.. i� y', t r � 1 9NI�A,_+',�`, '7ir•`.w i;� 1 rH. td �l $�+� r� #'�:"+1��• + ( ��Jl,iti�' �C' G tt `•i t y 7u,1I rfCt,r •••r1�..rrj; r r ., }' 'a`} .:7`',;.' ,l rL�lu}'�'•1iAy '.1�.�` .•. �+( x Y,:il',"1 :rI '.,, "!. .. "'r 1r`�#1$,.�.§ 1 �f' '+lY�r '.h„1 i{i{ yy�/ ,r,..;t �r�a'�� i� . r } ,^�r� "i t.,h "��1,'l �.�4A�r ?, i l) "`r��Y�if� t , ;�,r� i1�°'j'. � �+.f't tt tt . 1� '•► 't �.'v y f� lan r J1 u.A1 kl ; 3 hh i #r�.at� r,f,S ti� ,y�l yryf ,t;k }�l,.f.i: �.'• i 1 1', t, 4ya J..k. r" r'J fx y f ., !x +kt•`q{I +a:. `.'1; k l :'� 44'.'z 1� }.Ict �'3,. .t f•,t.l. 1,'� 1' , .t 1_ 1,,�. ^t +.y, t. .,•4., / "'' '� '' Lr+ j t,Y.;,'.5 v,i4'� > t} ,i r r' �, T • 4y" J''� �. ;.� '( Sr ktr/t•llir'rl lt. �,�5. '.l t.,}.�e.F.,•S1�!' • 1 •J'�f . rr r��.� , ~^ u J.r;=`�.. .ylS, 1 ,t.1•i �.�..�j�1•l y_ iNd� 4•�=1 ';}r •i•j ray,. "'�•h, �i pR. ,� ��•�. 7A a ff` ),1* 1' '• 1 3 }:I, S.. 1 T4.. . 11r �'• r ',� :I...•. F.,t.�.f�l•K, , ,:t;•r A,_ ��•.•t}.. ` •^ y; * {(.-�;�t rS�4 11 "1 �'h`�l�JT.' �+ •i:i,.•,i t e til tt iS•F :* S� , t_��1�k , i °4, i "`rk l• rt j l 1.' y 1.�♦ h f } 1, �• � �; i�{�*:'"; '4 t 9�-0; x y, '�d <"f, Ci�:+� iy,,, 1� , I�1 .li`��`,• v'Rrl.'' 'hLf 4,iy;t:`1�Kt f. .'.�' i"NM;}�,I�t4�1.3t".i. 'a,� S ,�.��r h S • Ji �. 't` u • � • 5r•1 } nu + T * } * t4! }ti, }t yii it x,, . it tAki4 y .:u .yhrt''��*J •e +,, ..'vt I�,j? �,fi�, tilM� Yk• ;�� f�y$.,��{y�yy.�v'�• w f , � ' }tt �4�."',�e�gt$� tZ`�1,z✓ i '�� � n {f �i }A �,r(h `�'r'�t� �1jj`;.J tr�i �,t,�= ,� tB � ttw t}�". ��� yj{}). '�� },# x' ",tl f :ay •r ,!�� -SS..'iJ.''l,{ `'i7 yy1,{ 4+..r 1 rY y. MS., !^tyY�r'.`) •}r 7 ''S,. + ��' `ii'S .�.j•., t ti��a>> 1, tr7ri� �'C..,rrYYi� S ,3�.�'y% '�"�� 7 � 1 Ey}it}'�j� M �i .ri f�' 1 ,.iF�.,q �j^/• '�NSN t �{'l+}�� w,.U 4 �,.e • ��!'' � � .� .f �•r�,+K 1�•t� .S�•4 ,.,� �-. 4 •+l i}i .y ( , Yr ,� A I��k t `�,. �',�t'�r` a. .�' rt , �1 ; 'i1.1 .�.V�,t`•�I�- ' t. '�$} !• 4 ,,•nl�i. ,rYr ti,. , iT ty t c� .y 'S j` 1��t" ?+ +,�r5 �. r i r'i � r4ilr . ! �• is � , •�:� [ � C } �,� ,'* It1y. _� ' � 't rt N - 4 f t ' t i• j •3� (r" . 4 �l i tF 5 a 1 i IL r tT-:: dune 4ntalan.o. Di'. tor - From: Le" d bright 4-124o - Local Coastal Program (LCP) 6o6 15th St. , 113 92648 Planning Division, City of H3 S8t:.h ect: Downtown Land Use Refera n' ' es : 1. Letter from Leonard might to Mary Lynn Norby, Planning Lept, City of Huntington Beach, Subject: Downtown Land Use, 8 24 2. Letter from Leonard Wright to June Catalano, Planning Div. , City of Huntington Jeach, subject: Downtown Land Use, 12-26-79. Letter. from Leonard Wright to June Catalano, Planning Div. , city of Huntington beach, subject: Downtown Intensity Alternatives, 12-30--79. This letter: . reviews positions taken by the LCP Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). . proposes changes when the draft of the LCP is considered. . provides additional information, analysis and comments. The specific proposal recommendations for the 5 subareas (see Figure 1) of the Downtown Study Area are: ` ane block •strip along PCci- from`6th to 'Goldsnwest. Agree with .LC,PC�,C positin Zoning and height limits to- be the same 'as on the inland side of Walnut, . overlay zoning of tourist-oriented commercial at specified .nodes to have a 35 foot height limit. Old' gown, A_.,e i,rith LCP CAC Position: specified land use and . zoning to remain as is. ' Gk, 'i"sty, res_ dei:Gial above ;la,lniit _ and _betwe'en 3rd•1dhdL-ak e. lieeommended change is : The land use, zoning„and height limits shall �be the name as .in Old Town Specific Plan District Two. i.e�-alled comments are in Section 2, p. 1 • C�ieLhc�lf»block frontin •the west side of iiartford to the axle above Orange shall be zoned the same as aid Torn Specific clan District Tiro. This avoids strip commercial and provides compatible land use along -Lake Street. This is a change. fram the curront plan. ' Dotitntown .lr4ai'n Street comineraial` area. -Agree with land use cicsigna« r tions, • recommended chanfie•: Include a 35 foot or 3-story height limit. Detailed comments are in Section 1, P. 3. Brea ras+dents I've ,talked to prefer to provide overlay zonir g now for the existing oil production land between 'Goldenwest Lind the bluffs. Our area has undergone continual planning since 1971, and we prefer to . finalize as Much as possible as soon as possible. Also, we prefer: to have the coastal: plan as much like citizens accept before .it goes to other bodies. Thus citizens are more likely to support different aspects of the plan and r.:void replanning. if "Land use modifications are recommended for these areas, ' .Nj"r - a•�lM.t'et'•r... .. •.... ...•r n.k Ni.J^:.'r.. ..n «.-x 1•:.t..t .. ' IY�i'ti1 tr.i�: .. :a.r t... .., . a,.-.ar.h• ..n.,..w...•.. ...• -L......,.lA_w.i:d:'.:. b. ;; v ,5 ' r.:...,_...w..+.cra7K.+1MNs!q+.±:f..ti k�'h;.U1 l'+2't:,:r:S."•.�:_.r.rr�inn_.. .e �i•. " _.. .... ... .. ....f.=��ft� •f't.-.+••••'•:h..•._n.ra•,r.wR rnN' . . -•1 K1 N1MfY.y.,fr.ry/I,••4•R..?+r.v.h._•...-_-. ,. 1 l!,• . . dolV v. .. vs ..• -r• ti � (•� � O � _ `�'Y i�mot. \.,� �[. `•�•.�+ r'�.r'� . fit'' � •� � 7 .. � r' i''t1\`4,../\•♦ `��•,,�\ _\ 1��� ••��`l�,. Q 1� f h' C7 1.r �/• ( t'+IfLot •l -. 31 , C 11 r .�\_?.1 \,'.• ar. ...'- ^' � •y ,� r r � !,�• by f ti f'I4�i�l� • \` ` �r.Z•i7 { •r Wit• `1, .. A <' '` M\,`r •, �•�. t� hI I \t; '1��`\`•IT}t.. ol f •!/. ' 7l••♦•"y ��\•�'! \i;•y!, `, \ ,� `,. \ �If��`• ter. � , 'f }f�� `•���t����••�• t• �.t l•��.` , i' '''+.��, i�l 7�� �'� •�r \"�`ti'�•�` '= '^�'_s1 r �- fir.� y;ti'�..r• ••� v •I-` tn no . Uryr=w�� /CtJ`•✓ �� Y �\' ,,.(` `�• aX •�'/`•\♦♦ � I tl',•A fit � • t`•�„'��-`�f ii�J )r.t.• �/:e\ \`�� .. �'••s i••`��, rt _"`•� �•�i •rs' •-` a��• "T )f�i'� r ;.J�t 1,I ♦.�� 'r'`''\,„•C `�.• •h `:ti \. �-='r� 1�✓' s r i f' �-r• .. `. �rw' j:f� \, r'- �'.�I�` ''_i ��_�`'i•y•l' �if::`ry.t:� i i '4 r-,'n'''•'1`-Nam,.-�'i �,i��'_. ��'(' -a t 1 K/ .C'�-t r`;CJwit 1 �S {,i.1 �• Gf �•j • '.t _ fl�n. _� r r s t '• �..♦' �r. •(, .S •Cf 'iJ 16 .0 L1 • ,: _ .t ;��r /J. r �•t �•` ~�..Jp.�: r_r .. .�.=(�,� U U" }; OLD WN Sp'h-Jc lc -Al Fiµ(0ol� ..- i• t •- ci• �� a ` I; , c' ':� it t —f�.j t i f i; I ► �._jt L--_ol jr-jr- r Or L I am,- �Q +. �•�(J� I r + � � �.. - -�I�:-� �_,:_lt . ~7C�. _ ..I (�"_ . � cn1fM�Jf�� r• �] ��" f��, �'1t ,r, ' �u_�•!�._ + .-...J t_._�..�,I_ t.. ,J l �l I- _Jin �__t _ _r1��7• •^ •`' 'i:.`.... �-� �.. �•I: .:• ;t ram (t' . ..-,_._. i.:Srr ( .I �• ..7_ '��� pui�-1'`trrao�a:to� •ai' n� J?7`I ► a%, tnir�. 't •�'I< � s' t r • �. � 9 � � t x a r� a't1 -- — RZ •LLIS to JC. Downtown mid Use. -3» 4-12-Bo • 1. Downtown Main Street commercial area (5 on Figure 1) . 1,1 kroponalc a. The land use to remain as specified by the LCP CAC, with the possible exception that the tourist-oriented commercial be overlay zoning with the base zoning the same as on the 200 block of Main Street. b. The height limit shall be 35 feet or 3-atories, 1.2 gackt round comments Some of the following comments will be further expanded in later sections. Almost everyone wants the downtown commercial area to be revitalized and to add to our tax base. Opinions differ on what in required to accomplishf-tti1$. The height limits should be saecif ied _as.2»storieu :;'r 35 feet because: a. Existing conditions and analysis justifies its . This fits with the existing community (see 1.3, p. 6) . If development higher than three stories is allowed, you run into problems (see L.4, p. 3 stories is economically viable and practical (see 1,y, P. 8) `; oonsideration b. Althou h%V,dome downtown ro erty --owners,,have wanted -ever ' s ocialy fo�ems,elves,, _and,-say "Let me du whatever '1 wanti-11 some are �. unwillinj,to give the lea t consideration to some others: . The PAC (Project Area Committee appointed by the City; Council to funnel citizen lnpi!'- to the CC . pertaining to, downtown commercial developmenc., . The PAC was composed entirely.. of tt owners of downtown business property ,except for_myself') voted c. .;2 to keep eminent domain in the Townlot residential 'Farea over the +mart&w,&opposition of Townlot residents (11-11-7 ) even though: ynan IWn the Townlot was initially added to the Redevelopment area solely to provide: tax-increment-funds to finance downtown commercial development. a the Townlot area was and is developing rapidly on its own, hence did not fit the need for redevelopment nor any need for the threat of eminent domain. One owner of downtown commercial property said that after we }✓ get the VTN plan, we'll go to work on the Townlot. Some dowhtoim property-owners (represented by Tom Whaling) � recontly brought suit against the residential zon3.% approved for 2nd Street. The judge found the points made by. the suers as being absurd. But this cost the Hinaldiis much time and an Initial 42,000 lawyer fee (more: to come) to protect their zoning so that they can build their home. c. `She attitudes and actions; of soiae owners of downtown commercial '. proRerty have earned: our change from support to o2 osition. In a number of instances you can like the person, although � . you may strongly dislike his actions. S i y . i,.Fy,,, i: _. ..., w..,..... ...:y.....r..,.a:+:.....e..,.. ....v.. ...... ... .. ... ..... ..., . '+ .' � ... i.'.<.. ... .r :;:T .:A:.32r,.•ILS a..+..,,... ..». 4". , r. Iowntown Le`' use. -4-- 4-12-80 Ny views on downtown commercial develop;aent have evolved: .1) from sIron , support of downtown property owners (1-26 -76 letter) : • strongly support downtown redevelopment. • desire that owners of downtown business property be satisfied with the proposed developments and procedures, • prefer to emphasize private enterprise when practical. • provide an increased tax base, • do whatts necessary to minimize opposition and tG keep the platy mo-ring along. . what's none in the Town Lot area should fit in well with the downtown redevelopment. We also want to avoid anything detrimental to Townlot residents. (2) to, skexticism of some of the property-owners as being objective and reliable sources of information: . Some tried to be objective (see 1.6, p. 9) . Although talking; private enterprise, some strongly supported the Initial Wii plan that required a jj39 million subsidy from the taxpayers (see 1..7, p. 9) . Self-Interest clouds objectivity• My position changed . from support to non-support (6-20.76) . (sec 1.8, p. 10) . Some being tantalized by almost unlimited profits became unwilling to settle for anything lerss . (see 1.9, p. 16) ( � to op2sitio'n to the development desires of some owners of downtown c:om:nercial property: VT14 and some PbC members ,.spo}.e one way, then did the opposite (see 1.10. P. 10) . One or mIore PAC members provided false information .to CC members and others they lobbied: (aea1.Z1. P. 11) 0 The 50:1 (Save 'C1ur Seaside) effort is bused an lies. * flicos't all. opposition to the VTN plan is basically unfounded. * Concerns over 'rode velopmetit resulted mainly from one person or one group of people. * Those critical of redeveloprent' will operate In a climate of emotionalism. Note: At. the 11 Oct 76 hearing Tam Whaling twde the most emotional ,. presentation (the others were essentially non-emotional') , t1isleading. comments Fir Whaling wade at the 11 Oct 76 hearing. # Teachers encouraged studentn 'to disrupt the .bearings, Nat Thiu lie was further enforced on page 5 of David holt's ,3 Feb 1980 letter: "It was even rumored that speoial grades were given to high school and college teenagers to come to the meetings and voice their displeasure . Certain teachers were observed directing the choruses of bud mannered youngsters," Sol 41 4p 3 7 '4'V 3, 4 y VI i Ilk .0 ,,J. '3 5--1)l w� 77 .77 - f All L1�211. w LLW to JC. Downtown e-ft)d Use. -6- 4-12-80 1..3 A I-stovy hei ht limit fits with this existing communit . a. Commentts by 'Urban Land Institute ULI in thair 1 " 6 ranch. discussion Page references are to the Planning Dept draft of this discussion; . . The VTN concept doesn' t fit with the existing community.(p•21) It's advantage to keep more of the present character (p. 27) . Explore scaling down and moving the project south (p. 19) b, Area residents prefer to maintain the character of the area. 500 to 860 showed-up at the 1976 hearings in support of low .Intensity. The bulk of public input from area residents is for a low height limit, People have the right to a good quality-of-lifer and not; to have this Jeopardized by increasing* the intensity characteristics of the area. Multi-story buildings best fit into wide:-open areas, such as Fashion Island which Is some distance: from any residences, If .almost anyone asks himself if he prefers multi-story near his or her home, the answer almost; alsmys 'is no '(maybe somewhere else, but not around me) , borne of the reasons are: you have an overpowering structure nearby that may: block views and oreeznv, cast sa shadow on your residence. It causes pressures toward developing at increased densities, If someone builds multi-story comm€:rcial and finds he there can't mralte u financial go of it, his next step As to. encourage increased densities In the surrounding residential arenas so as to provide a larger market for himse"!f. One downtown property-owner said that after we get tho VTR; cone-upt, We'll go to work on the Townlot. t 'rhus3 there's a concern that multi-story development may be: a forerunner to other activities and increased taxers that It difficult for resident owners; to remain. . con est:nn of pedestrian and vehicular traffic. . circulation problems. conflln;4s of pedestrian use near the pier. . other pro'al.ems associated with increased inteanuity. . o. Councilwoman Ruth Fink HOP Vosing high-rise development proposals, for the downtown area r►eaA! the pier, Isirs. Finley said 'less intens et development { of resat-Aurants, and shops, similar to Peter's Landing develop- ment In bunsert r3each, is more de:sireable. . . . "Development should be compatible with the opon;4space beach atmosphere to address the concerns of the re nidents living . around` the area.++ (Huntington Beach Independent# P• 7# 4-t7-80) • A 'Century City type development would change the atmosphere and life style in a way that the €ores' residents wouldn't likes. . s't t t LL1;1 to JC. Downtown xl"INl Use. 4-1240 d. Jay Truax, architect (21 Jan. 1980 letter, from Mary Lynn Norby to LOP CAC that summarizes Nr Truax'u phone comments of 21 Jan.) . It is important to analyze the impacts that potential multi- story buildings could have on the various locations where they might be used. The aspects of shading, views, .light sewer service and, of cuurse, parkJng, need evaluation before deter- minations are made. 11r. Trur.x has offered to present draw- ings explaining some of these aspects, . From his knowledge of the local area,, 1-�r. Trisax feels that hotel or visitor-serving uses, possibly multi-story, would be appropriate south of bake Street. riowetrnr, at. Main Street these uses would not be as appropriate. e. flarrX LL, kl�iidds, Jr. ' (1Feb._ 1960 letter to the LCr CAC) "I. do not feel that high rise structures will enhance the quality of life in th.1.s city. . . . The quality of life in a _ family oriented community muut be the over-riding consideration. "I would enviBion a redevelopment plan. that Woad propose a common theme design .for the businesd district limited to two stories. A market analysis should be conducted as to the type of businesses which could flourish through resident And visitor patronage, Restaurants . . . should be a nignificant part." f. Comments about multi-story alonE the coast between Lake and Beach Olvd, From my viewpoint, it'u unethical, to oppose multi-story In a nearby wren, but support it further away '. Hy position is to allow no multi-story along the coast. If this position is overridden, t:hf)n: multi-story should be restricted to limited areas with a maximum height of 6 stories. . rsotify the nearest homeowners to a depth of at least 3 blocks ; (starting with the nearest home) of the hearing. . prevent a well-developed plan that inoludes Adequate safe- guards and limitations with sites located so as not to adversely Impact resident owners (see my 5-14-76 paper on high rives) . , . abandon the plan if the preceding item is not; successfuiiy accomplished. ' f; 1.4 If devvlo mentyhi&her than three stories, you run into Vro liams. , xuth Yinlf! , Huntington beach independent, } 7~ u. po 71 • �� The intensity that would be attracted to high rise; in •the pier area would cause circulation problems that couldn' t be solved, } .a I . t, LLW to .iC. Dot.....--,town LMl. Use. --f3- �' 4•-12-bb 1.$ stories is economically viable arid- practical. a. The V•rt; clan is not economically feasible. A 5-7-•76 letter from Urban Projects Inc. (UPI) of Beverly Hills provides; the following information: 461,300,000 project development coats ( this excludec cost of land, parking garage, related street improvements and utility changes) . $53,4000 000 capitalized value of the project (based on pro.'ected income stream of commercial and capitalized value of condominium units) 6ince the development costs exceed the capitalized value of the project, the laird assume: a negative value. $39.700,000 cost to the city D29,700,000 parking garage 10,000,000 property acquisition and relocation, deic011tion, 'I demolition, utility and street mods, administration ;�426,200,000 amount the city could raise via tax increment bonds and lease revenues. . -rile cost to the cicy would be 313,500, 000 mere than it could raise in support of the development. b. The ?ow intennit concept is closer to future market potential than the high VT5'T or interined5te intensity concepts, Thin is base.t on information found after p., 60, Proposed . Redevelopment Plan B.Iii for H3 downtown redevelopment project, , � July, 1976. Thu pro's and con's of the 3 development Intensities are summarized In Appendix It, lief. 3. Note that a downtown revitalization -Atil a 3-story height limit is more intense and development extensive than the "rehabilitation" described in the LIH and summarizesLl immediately following: Concept G ilehrbilitation Fointn in favor • Less alteration to the existing street network than would be under. concept It (YrN plan) . • Four times less demand on utility and energy resource supply capabilities as under concept A . • ►iould use existing alleys as pedestrian paths thereby reducing the need for relocating utility • bore businesses should find it economically feasible to return to the -block area than under concepts it and b. • Possibly tiie greatest chances of first block' buuines; owner to participate In the same location after redevelopment, j Points oppoul•tion ,. . Although _commercial, apace exceeds market potential, It's not by as Bauch as under concepts It and 6, . Rehab will be insufficient for some structures (revitalize) , . high not be able to afford malls (assuming you want: malls) . i t` .,.,Lift -to JC. Downtown 1,`V use. -9- 4•-12-80 These evaluations were based on; . a much more intense tourist-oriented destination resort th Is now contemplated. This included substantial city promo a large auto tourist trade and capturing relatively high percentages of out.-of-state tourist trade (but, Knott's 3err Farm which t"ormXiy closed only on Christmas now is closed. 2 drays a week) , regional, state and local tourist trade. . more commercial area than is now planned. f e, Other reasons a 3-.story height; limit should be more than adagua. - . To get a cuffielent number of customers, a commercial area should draw from a complete circle with about a 5-mile; radius t-lain Street would only draw from a half-circle, Some parts of Fashion Island are #4 to be slow in bussinest3. Enough commercial areas and specialty areas are in the general area that only a low .intensive use should prove practical, especially if you want all of our commercial to develop Into strrong$ Viable, profitable businesses. d. Some Owne"rs of downtown' business Rroperty have too narrow of a self-interest to know uhat s economically yractical. Ism not sure that any of the downtown property-owners know what's requir.-d to make their Projects economically- feasible, n 3-.story height limit should be economically feasible. . Thatts 50,a to 2OQ4 higher than the existing one and two story buildings, The 'owners of downtown commercial have long known what the general *&=ds�w intensity of the downtown and surrounding residen a l property is. 1 .6 Some downtown propert -owners tried to be objective. s For some time a number of PAC members seemed swept along on some Items by the more outspoken members. others seemed to want; .to move things along smoothly and to not crake waves, 'The;refor, for some time most seemed to support the TO plan or felt that there was little choice but to go along. tr. 2► 11-8-76 letter) . 1.7 Although talking private enter rice some stronily supported 4 Initial Vn plan that re uired a 43-2 million subsidy from the tax play a x's. ; . 11m certain that some PAC members are trying to be objective. What disturbs me is that VTN and RAC have talked one way to the � public, then acted the opposite. (p. It 6-20-76 letter) , This was VNIs preliminary proposal. It's an entirely different approach than wheat they recommended in their first presentation. � If thin plan were bath viable ar4accerpte:d, the affected. proporty» ;.'�, omiers should be delighted. It packs a lot into the area. :;i, (p. 2, 5-14-76 Letter) . . According to their. requests, VTN seems to scant to "go on wulfarerr from the HB taxpayer.' uavld dolt on p. 4 of his J Feb. 1980 � letter states.- when the city was made aware that It would have to pay an estimated .y29 million for underground parking, it decided to renig on every one of its contractual, agreements with V1W &hd the Molt group . . ." Mote: The: signed agreement in essence said that the parties cif � the lawsuit would resume the lawsuit if the: city did not adopt r LL:1 to JC, Downtown �!d Use. -10- f 4-12-80 a plan to be submitted by VrO. It seems inconalstent that you can bring a lavisuit that you don' t` want a '-block area used' for parking than support a proposal that: includes the taxpayer financing 4 stories of parking under the same 5-block area. (p• 2. 6-20-76 letter) . I'm strongly for free-enterprise (see enclosures. 1 do 2) , but feel that even free-enterprise should be reasonable. (p. 2) 1.8 Self-interest clouded the objectivity of some owners of downtown commerc,lal property. . There's some sentiment in the PAC that UPI shouldn' t financially evaluate the VTN proposal ---. that VTN should evaluate its own Proposal (but VT,4 hasn't taken any initiative here) . Unfortunately, after being tantalized with a maximization of profit potential far the pier-area blocks fronting PCH, some FAC members may now be inclined to accept nothing less. It's bad practice to let an organizations self-evaluation of its own work go unchecked, It would be a further indiscretion to eliminate a consultant evaluator just because their analysis discloses facts that some may wish 'didn' t exist. (p. 2, 5-29-76) . It may, be that Foe: of the first block property-owners : - want all they can get for themselves. - have much less concern for elsewhere (p, ?a, 5-29-76 letter) . . VTM (sand PAC's support of their, latest proposal, even though only in concept) have becomes hindrances to moving along with a good redevelopment plan. Regarding VTN and KiC, the current situation obligates me to change from support to non-support, Unfortunately the self-interest of VTN and some PAC members have so slanted their attitudes and proposals that neither can be accepted as a guiding light. They've no one to blame but themselves: if reactions to their actions kill or seriously hamper redevelopment. (p. 2. 6-20-76) 1.9 Some bong tantalized by almost unlimited profits. became unwillingr ttoosettle for anythin_ 3 less. Nentioned in paragraph 2 under I.B. 1.10 V'Ilti and some PAC member spoke one way, then did the oI) ap, aite For possibly 1�. yenrs VIN assured the publ:.s, that they intended low intensity development for the pier area. Then after the public want along with this, V'T6 presented their development proposal ---• whioh was the opposite of all precious assurances. Then some Nho're strongaut for the WN proposal) intimated that- the public's previous acceptance of the low--intensity assurances somehow means that they accept the opposite - the current'`VTh plan, Such duplicity creates 'distrust. t:any people therefore feel .that they'll be given vague promises and empty ass:ra*ances to defuse opposition. Then after it's too late for the public to have an impact (possibly sometime after the. redevelopment plan is approved) , the more significant of their concerns will be proven correct. t �`.'w N.'.�'I�.,1., ♦A:1s............ . •.... •..• .. r.J\,..y,. w... a..'!.. \.•.... .. . L - w ♦ :..•. '`..v.a„+L:':4L.-., . 1.L..:.-Yi(lO'orr..r...... ..... . f . ,f LLW to JC. Downtown uo` use. -11- /" '�; 4-12-80 • 1.11 . one -or rnore: PAC members )rovl.cled false Information toe( CC members and others they lobbied. During oral communications a City Councilman told a member of a mi (Save Our Seushore.) that, their effort taus bawd on lies. iiheii Tom iihaling made this same s to barmen t to an zUzj member during, a 1-1"L' meeting, I Asked ;that the lies; were. It turned out that 2 girls circulating petitions uaid that the VTV plan would cost the US taxpayer �.40 million. VTh made this an Issue by initially requesting the city (i.e. the taxpayer) to fund 09 million of the V1174 plan (for such as 4 stories of under- wound parking, pilings and subfloorin for developments from the pier and tram se:rvioe onto the pier) . p. 4. 11-8-76 letter) . Some mi:sleadinE comments at the Oct. 11, 1976 heari!2�6. 1i sizeable group of people have some of the same concerns that Lance Jacot voices. I also share some .ot these concerns: limited use of eminent ptomain, intensity of development, quality»offlife: for the area, being able to afford to remain, proper and limited use of tax-increment-financing (or can we get by without it?) and h}.gh rises. Thus I feel obligated to speak up when misleading statements are made to discredit sppkesmen for .these concerns. I refer tV some of Tom :lhaling's comments at the Oct. 11 hearing: 1. The ,FAC is not aaains t Or . PAC was Initially against any parks in the redevelopment area (although I believe a number were; just sweet along) . In the Sep. 29 setter from kAC to CC on P!iC positionu: 5 members of PAC (including Tom Whaling) "are especially opposed to Including any park site designation within the Project hrea boundaries." IJuring a PAC meeting the statement was to transmit PAC positions to the CC, but to not make thew public during the hsaring. My comment was that this letter should be rend so that the ;public can know our positions. ' 2. The 800 effort was an 11th hour thin. Lance Jacob read his paper at the hearing for the prelim- tnary plain in Feb. In Nay. a number of people were asking about starting some coordinated effort, ..By early June a number of people were worling on their independent efforts --- some were already collecting signatures on petitions. 3. ate' .c held 28 M PLC meetings and Lance has been to few of them, We all like to feel that the meetings of organizations we're prominent in are important. But most people find klik them boring, feel that their input hau negligible impact or, what -FhC does, and that the meetings are of little value to them (not enough to vary often sacrifice; an evening for -•-- and Lance does spend a aignific'ant number of volunteer evenings at the Main Street Library) . ` An SOS member has attended most PAC meetings that I've been to. The impression that most people have Is that the public hearing is the time to give their inputs. fir.,.. ,vr:lay .. .« .......... .... ...... A } ry Mil to JC. downtown LFONf Use. -12-• 4-12-80 ' 4. This plan::is not- ttiroiiind old ladies out on the street. It's not tearing; dorm little houses. Making such statements, then trying to infer them onto Lance is playing on the emotionalism that we say we're against, 5. hequest to be permitted to s eak to the students of Fir.JaaoOn CJ.LiBs. This implies the untrue assumption that tlr. Jacot asked his students to attend thu hearing. It also incorrectly Infers ,- that the main (or only?) concern about. redevelopment .is ,coming; ; from the student community. It reflects the intimidation, that 1. Tom• int:ended to carry his opposition of Lances redevelopment views to the place of Lance's employment. This is an undesireable practice. (pp 4-•5, 11-8-•76 letter) . The preceding are further examples of ,why we question the ob'Seetivity and reliability of some of the information that comes from some of the owners of downtown commercial property. .. r . 17, j r •t• • t a `�4t+•^. t�i.i.�lr}i diet w+.wi.......»,,.."....«�, .. •wr.p. ai•A+'3%..,..,Ai P...A;:.,...r'JJ: ...w...... •yL l.i t:::Y:'+*...y...-r+"-we• •:�i.`�x . A.'..+'4at ••.' .'MCJJ i..wry,. i J: LUI 'to JC. Downtown r"d use. -13- 4-12-80 ,2. Ex�ng residential above Walnut and between 3rd and Lake ( `✓ on Fig. 1) 2.1 Proposal: The land use, zoning and height limits shall be the same as in Old '.Gown Specific Plan Distr�ct Two. (homes on 25-foot lots. or up to triplexes on 50-foot lots . 2.2 Backkroun'd comments .r a, ter. Whaling made incorrect statements about 2nd Street and Its new zoning. 1.. There's, only one home on 2nd Street. There are roughly 14 homes on this 2=block section of 2nd Street. 2. 2nd Street 13 not developed residential. r3esides the 14 homes on 2nd Street, there are: . two duplexes, each on 50-foot lots. . a duplex on a 75-foot lot. . a realtcr's hut. . two one-story apartment buildings. . vacant land. ��ta 'When you classify buildings Uwpt residential, co=orcial and industrial, this Area definitely is classified as residential. 3. Th�is_nrea shouldn't have hl zoning. t The noaly acquired Old Town Specific Flan District Two zoning is not Ill zoning. The ill , lit etc. designations indicate horn much lot area is required per living unit. H2 requires 2000 square feet of lot area per living unit. Since the specified zoning allows 3 unIts per .50-loot lot (the lot is 5§U square fact = 117.5 x 50 feet) , the zoning is slightly denser than the 6000 square feet required for 3 Living unite on R2 property. r b. Lrlwsult aaz.inat the residential zoning uaroved for 2nd Street. Some downtown property-owners (represented by Tom ;shaling) recently brought suit against the resirlcntlal zoning approved for 2nd Street. The judge found the points made by. the suers as being absurd. But this cost the 111naldi's couch time and an initial J2000 lawyer fee (snore to come) to protect their zoning ro that they can build their home. c. Aprevlous petition had u:ianimousa Fupport from�pro2er -owners, About 1?s to. 2 years ago Patti. Jewul t circulated a petition to the effect that: .1 ` .4e the undersigned want the zoning for the property above r,alnut and between 3rd and Lake changed to itl. I Every property-owner that Patti contacted signed the petition. Eatti wau able to contact all but 3 property-owners. 1 w77 •. ... _..... .. .... ..1.... a.I' _. i.. t!• • J...t•i air.x,w....w.•r.... ....�..r D .LLB+ to JC.• Downtown La'�Use. -14- 4»12-80 d. Almost-,'everyone wants residential where they live protected from other uses. Allowing residential into commercial Areas can yield reasonable results . in some instances. -gut it's not a good idea to allow office or other commercial into a residential area. Which one of us wants an office building next to our home? a. Summary of comments of p. 6,_ flef. 2. 1. This area, was incorrectly_ zoned in 194-6. It's completely residential except for a doctor's office in an apartment building at 3rd and rlalnut and a small "All Seasons Realtors') but at 2nd and Orange. little 2. It's better to have too mush rather than: tbo much commercial. Thin avoids the gas station on every corner concept. 3. The Rinal di's and the-people on 2nd. S tree t on Dec. -17 j 1929. received a change of zoning for; 2nd Street above' rialnut. The new zoning is Old Town 'Specific. Plan Two zoning. 'Phis allows homes on 25 foot lots and up to triplexes on 50 foot lots. The City Cowicil vote was 6-1. 4. Since the area was zoned commercial. people have been -unr,abl.e to 'upgrade their residences beyond a certain per cent of the value of their structure, or •to build according to the existing use of the land. those who wanted. to sell lzad a difficult time. i 5. This retsiclential zoning fits in with how the area is .devel6m dhd-allown� people on low and moderate Incomes to continue to live here. 6. Lake .Street in-this area should be zoned residential so as to avoid strip commercial, and since Lake is not the major thoroughfare than; should support commercial to any Great extent. ,r i i i 1 t \��;� ti `. ,•;;!..A'.t^.+• .v..-v..........rw...-..... .... ...... .... ... .. • n . . .(:.. ..` i.y.,.. ....... •........ •� .a iWf• •fC.^..w. rw•.w...wr.,..... •+Yw ;r i •. i. i • 'a .r. BEST PHOTOGRA rijL c t • • REPRODUCTION + �t. • { POSSIBLE DUE TO r .AGE AND CONDITION OF ORIGINAL DOCUNENTS I :��tw�i��lf'er�+�Y�i'i�`��t �:,L3�1'�•-•�a ��;�r"+i�I�F �1'�� ii '�c+�k.xii�►'�'t +l�rl��;k,. �i.'-24.YJJ �K"�"t•"+j Rs r. te.,�S ar.Mn •c f rtw t+•r, :v r. u.+..r r...t«� p ;.w�.rr a<r <r rn�/Ti, `S 1. �1 /�Ft�+(S his,n'.�ehl,�ap" ,.�,. � y T t�'.`t .�).,u•I r. r" t f , '��•R'�F'3-:'F� "..I.� i'r�'S "r �.� t't� .fit`++!,�• I.,y?'.illy i"' rt '.11`',�!�•' if; •� Y,t`. .. �,s •al"',:r�-,'S- ;+�, ti�� ,'�il,'F ,• ` 1l *F l�.k�4�1rC i 4 i :f J. .. r i . r Enclosure 1. LLr) to JG . —is— 4-.12-80 dp e `r!'dCh £CottO)rlfCsi ERI'Jjf To the Editor: SI%LI'•Ilr'T1:Itl:.ti'1' directs our THUS A LIMITED government also t must understand economics so economy and makes it consistent — has reria)n economic functions: 11) to we we can face issues as consumers, for business and consumer do what is provide the legal foundation and en• best for themselves. T w a e•earners, voters and he consumer is vironment to make ttre price system businessmen. Through no fault of our king. ife votes for a product when he effective; (2)to maintain competition: buys It. 131 to tax business for or prohibit own most of us weren't taught about Businesses want to maximize pro• ness them from polluting air and water; free . enterprise -- or how o u r fits. So they produr�e what the people economic system spread the greatest vote for. Thus the people decide what (4) to subsidize benefits that accrue�to abundance among a greater number will 6 produced and how much via society as a whole(chest X-rays,polio of people In the U.S. the law of supply and demand. And in, education, national Our government of We people 211OWS those%ha serve the most people In tile defense, fire and police protection). free rein.to men's Initlath-e. abilities best, most efficient. least cnsl;y tray and, (S) to control unemployment and and yearnings.This Is why we (with 6 profit tire, most. Few buggy-whips are )nflatfon during the business cycle. percent of the world's people) create made today because customers voted We should guard against a specific half the w•orld's wealth, against them. government action doing more harm Capitalism works because we're A TV set cost Vern In the 1910's. (Iran good.For example.(tie Robinson- free to keep most of what we earn, to 'then someone selfishly sought a Tatman Act of 19M (outlawing quan• own private property at.d be rewarded greater profit.' Ile Improved pro• tity discounts to large buyers) may for our savings. Thus we have the duction to make a better set for half have stifled price couelition mom Incentive to dream, work hard and the price. So he got more money for than It hindered rnonopo y, save. Himself. 'creatri fobs and provided A CA1'ITAIdST Is air who lower-priced sets for a far greater ALSO, DURING recession t h f:. Y person number of people. government spends to spur the uses his $avings directly or Indirectly economy. So during good times the to build erterprises which provide Jobs COMPETITION arises out of search rovernmW should pay off the debt. and products for our use. Ynu're a for profit. Competition is a primary Instead,politicians yield to expediency capitalist It you own life Insurance. regulating force In our market and further raise the debt by ex- ravings. some of your toots of labor. economy. Competition guarantees that cessive spending.. Interest In a pension or profit-sharing the economycs resources will be Our future opportunities,prosperity, glan. shares of stock or your owp mobilized according tc consumer security and chances to advamee de• usintss. wants.A company that sells good ball- peed largely ore how well we un. Most of us want "more material derstand and foster our market. goods (larger home, clothes-dryer, )mint pens for M cents sells more pens directed economy., Economic, prin- etc.) To have more we roust produce. than the company that sells f2 pens. ciples should be taught in our secon• more.To produce more we roust have Thus competition lowers prices. dary schools. more and better tools, It costs IM,lslrr Competition alsn brings better LEON'.f1D WRIWIT average to buy the tools to create rich service.installment buying,and better new job. Pee fe invest in tools only if and more diversified p r o d u c t s• there's a chance for a g,)od or Through ads, competition supports reasonable profit. Why risk their sav newspapers and informs the people. aim== ings If they know their profit won't he Sonre economic endeavorsdon't any more than the interest they'd col- function properly If left solely to [tie lect on a savings account? principles of free enterprise. 1•riday, August 2, 1468 Eno IDsure 1 (contd) . j. i to JC. V%W t "'L AsSe What OurFlag Sunday, Juno 11, 14'b4 alb %hat they earn. Since we have she right to profit and to own provides low- ('-1������� For dirivate pt�.xrty, we have the it-priced -goods for a great- �` J� incentive to dream, work hard er number .o( people. Thou, and save. Capitalism delivers what eom- Ry LEONARD L.WRIGHT We use profits in: 11) inwer munlsm promises. Capitalism prices, 42) raise stages, (3) satisfies our moral code ex- reward stock • Hiders. 141 pro- pressed In the Ten Command-' (vidp hvr research and develop- rnents. our tools must Increase. In ludo Inent(cren'.ess new products and We feel a thrill when Re han•i � A greater abundance and pnl• , or air Fla during patriotic men worked to hours a week. jntn and loarrs pri^eat ar,d (5) g g pa Tools supplied only 5 per cent� taxes. Tivent ca;s ago► itical and tcottomlc freedom cetetuonles. We tingle when we of the work - power. In IMO pay • In • roast phone.. call) are the privileges cif the'Amer- sing to ether "Cod ' Buss fonts furnished es per cent of the Lost s:n. Now Ih- .Ise of Ivan fires of Life. Privileges America.' Our Fla symbol- pnw&r. Alen workod (it hours radio relay and coaxial rablcsi� Imply resp9tt aren't if the g Ym responsibilitic� Wren'( met, the ties the American Wty of Life. a week and had a -much high- the s.sme call r:nsis i_2,, ' privileges are In danger of be- We have*a great abundance er standard of living. !A TV set cost $50 to 1040. Ing Jost. Ec:nuse of one (actor — (rev To have more we must pro. Someone seeking a larger pro- dam. ' - duce mare. To produce'more fit improved production to make Set a gooel example. Pxrticl• • 'ae mast have more and heifer x heifer set for halt the pace. Pale In church, civic and com- freedoms guaranteed by the tools. It costs 11M. ,000 average Now many more people bought munity organitattuu. Respect to buy the tools (buildings, the lax. human dignity and Caastftutfo•.t: right to worship, Esc sets( (to rats, their standard of Y machines, desks 6410 create liy'm. and provide more jobs), Individual rights. Support civic fete speech and press, aasem• each new ob. People invest r p programs for social Improve. Illy,petition for grievances.pri• 1 eop Tv wouldn't have been readily men(. Attack Alga and re. vacy In our homes, not be held In tools only It there's a ehsnce available. to a majority of the try P j- for a good or reasonable rorit. udice wherever th exist. of ts•ttliout Gall fora -long,period P people if: tl) business or labor aY y jury, travel Why risk their money It they' kept the price up by keepbtg Learn.how 10 explain clearly time, trial b i lree;y, elect our officials by at• know their profit axon'( be any most of the increased pro I. the American cret ballot, and contract about greater than lilt intcrcat they (2) the person•%'ho improved compare it with o( life and oppocing ways stir affairs. These freedoms would collect on a savings ar lhi production prnerss wasn't of life.Avoid extremism and pu• count? Profits are the back• rewarded. (31 ran ects Inr loco lilical parlisanddil. But speak help provide for our social and p P civil progress. Some argandza• Corte of our capitalistic: systern. er averace profits discouraged up strongly for America and s dons vlgilsntly protect (h e t e The People decIdt what will flock - holders from investhig a f,%lnat communism, evert In _ i freedoms. be pmdured and (row much via the necessary money. the praynce of critics. Too i stir free-enterprise (capital• the law e f supply and demand. P,nme people either dnn't un• many cry ,Peace al any price j Isthe) system hrdn„a our Am. Fer; buggy Nhip% are made demand or appreciate free en- —even surrender." Some peo. emrnal econorntc progcss. Ore today hecaue customers vntcd Ierprise or would like to des- pla are so afraid of rommu• can represent "Alan's Material (faith their pxkettxroksl against troy it. Communists and other ntsm that they don't want to Welfare" by the simple equa• bulgy %hips. These sthn fene� Aocialista condemn capitalists as hear anpthing about IL Free- (ion; the moxi lx•ople In film best, being selfish. Communists ap- dom Is hard won and easily mint efficient, least costly way( peal to Wfishness when they lost.'The prices of liberty Are profit the most. Thus. high pro• tell one group it can take from courage and eternal vigilance. •{- x fits signal that a demand ea-1 the others. This form of self- Display your faith in Amer- j�r I Ills for a product; slut more, tshness brings at)xtt the tm. Ica. Vote for candidates of In. � _ pcnale should gel Into this bust! Is•ersal povett) and fats living trgrity who support your he• Iri{'i>' I x + acts. # afandards found In all rommu• liels. Keep yourself and others Others (MI13 till,Io Competition arises exit of nisi • bloc catntries because: informed from reliable sources iiltcrds� Nee.? res K� rearch for profit. A company, ihe incentive of the best pro- (suit as fdesder'a.Digext and Ia lhsl sells good Will . point pens, U.S. Nets and World Report). nd contribute to rc- 1M iatH=xn Energyatiral os for Sn cen!s :ells more pens ducera is destroyed since the rsfhleaatriotic organizationsand T dfl Too3o} than the rompany that sells ri ' let y P pent. Thor, crunfxtillon Innersi cant p trha! they've earn• of yw. r choice fe.g. write to Most nl us cant more mstecl i prices. Cnmpanies also coo•( � the free - loaders are en• Frfcdom Foundation, V a i I e y Al goods Ilarger home. clothes pe(e by giving better ten-Ice; coursgrd to do less since they'll Forge. Penn., for a free ropy dryer etr..). In the a b o v e. (r'.tr.malnlenanre guarantees n live off the producers. Iferej of Freedoms Ilindbook; request equatim we want AIAIIY to In.! new cars), installment buying., communism violates two of the I the monthly newsletter from crease. 1f AISHV Increases, 1•en Commandments VT h o u Christian Anti - communism either Nit, III, m T must In- bet LCr shalt not steal" and 'T h o u Crusade. (lox OW, Long Beach Crease also. Our natural re• maung (ind more diversifled)l shalt not covet lily neighlol's 3. Calif.), 06ur4es are limited and we praducta ind supporting news-( goods")• flu( under capitalism .114 your Flag rind my Flag- cant work roach harder thin Papers fads). • s omeone In a selfish search for irt'c ever !ove and defend.it., � e men have in the past..There• r Capital.sm works hccaute l profit gets more money inr him-, fore Me outnber and quality oil pen are free to krep most tit- tell. create% Inh% and t . . •r,-_,..-,..,,.,. ...jam.,..' � Fehr i F�'ofi; vary � ` T J d lfolt 2980 o; zcp P Ca talc Q ty lanni nC�,, f3. of f fun 9to.1o1°Z Of lfun s of t n poach txngt the Ci t Cali�. 0 otie Reach earnCi vrnia rer3;?t a to Leona Cali f°rnia } .non roe 9 DO;vn �.Irx 9b t , the 1 that iRothe abo nil Use s o Nr• rj• aye r'ndo anY , r`'r°r ntl'ine ?re str 9h t s t v°recl t�mor)is°ed eri., u� °n9ly atos fires noLd ytrlb r V in9 a OF oN h and o�� 1 „� ent `7 df fey�c inn o rd f t na r; e£l jf'o eivit vel°f3�ght Z rumi le ent °Az and ek�ri9trL , r 01,ot t im"Ot. to the ml t• `h js vt• maaor�tY o n afi2nat'fOrt is r f -Sid n Core <3nt or above incl y foar. area t.�tfs tf,?l 01. rej two Udo uzble z'Csf ©� ncf l s 9i veea 0 ro 0, . t t p t3 t omen t AY•esort l Pro j ncl penis '�a�o o;rri, etin n bR, the a maJo the f s s, fir g t'le tab 20 `rnt j r tY ar y gr '�}' Idr h° Ala low lri.tv of ee of stl3`. ws. „ Pilot. ed vA a ren small 1fold nnjn �'l9Jrt rest 'ronfn it xs Piro.. a yre L/reir terw, AorL,.en0 pf dcP4�r " lin+1 t, eats `f in ttnot area'k stilro e t d�c7 sham, Peof71 nt`�9e tlrp C mont a • neL° tJre e rUrrt.l ti°Lail la�rr� 1 lr's, of t/r a ,.lot of °Wens-Us t the nrdfn eye- nve A:c the „ to a fio ocn•n . Hors cond Just 9 C° t.y sore to ?o babiyy want say Lfker 9� Ong Ear Jive Feted Cft dfrl at and a oh l ik Al•efer ra S. ttn t ` mo, , °pert hero in the !°r not 1 t M.t Mess• Q t t h tha t �'o S°fi °se w f? �`onae y ha ye tho the till f y 4or �,fle I�r� tOs por notJtlr Jhjng o �xro gtrorrtlY npt any �,�mQ, se ' t/je rr04 r'�91rt the l g be d©no I�rol er . shau r flh too 3 e`�rs t roVert.� h 90�:3 `?``rt G dons' a fn th y oRvn �d entC tat m to bi�eofsIo 7'lr�, Y, no .tefbx On to S S'OO W th;?t �'owntp rs• S('a Kris cars d orr stax,df'rof,r, r cfrd ..tom N`�Y� „ • T it �'n 't tos..rf�,es 'yat�."° the arOze ils h � .Zrt.Y et►rtrtrY 1, ��'r1N,rst tar -. hf.. " ProE►c; Et 9f t.e No CC),) tr�7 Y bj, L� e card d.zd rho L�k..• �freot• a 1';, a, r a �€n ` 'e go `r't'lye g,7m , f ye an i 01) �' r ht 11 oio me net the C r�'i7n rs? real! tied f i t 1 i +•fie , 9f rbot. �t s t i t u-;eo t�h fni. rfta ve n to r Eh�, m let rat in �Y ns�, r19ht ° of to o- °t: �r curr_ CO e Iac an , 1;� �?le t� b the U r fro o ,xtilo e t or vat Of 1, -wal thQ rrfted f3ment° ate u x n .v 7F nO�'l�•dte1�. �1 �""rf t,� arch! -Oct f r... •. nc4� '`.,,'�,1 . Je� :srir bl eLirrn it 1 Port lto C,o f r' n9 1 nt ach C 1�r`�.,onZje . ' wood T:;: r••t v F ti ♦ Y2 y'r .,it Page Two If Mr. Wright really is concerned about anything but reserving the prehistoric limitation on his neighbors, let him make the same effort he claims to have made poling his "majority of people" and talk to some competitive developers and learn the facts of life -from builders who really know what heights it would take to make a successful and beautiful development in the downtown area. fie will find that what his people "prefer" would not enter into the financial equation of development at all.. lie also speaks of "preserving views". What views is he talking about? The view of the old buildings? The view of the surf shops and bikini emporiums? The view of Maxwell's? The ocean? Well, good news for Mr. Wright. In none of the plans for high--rise , do the downtown property owners plan to move the ocean or disturb Maxwell's or the pier. Benches are provided for all the residents to wall: a block to the beach and look at the view til their hearts r;htent. About the only statement that we can partially agree with is when. he says "You might correctly state that development has been inhibited in this area for seVera1_.years_'�. That is a as erpleece tsf"�l1n�t dzhtateinent; inti kited~is ,much too mild a word. Thwarted is better. , conspired is closer, prevented is accurate. Sto�pcc�'3's pi:ec3.sG.:lie quotes`"�Ialu�s`1i�s`ve'rfsen"�"Yf'"Lfi�sis •. true,' it is in spite of the cit�'_s acts to r�:press_ devclQpman+- and depress property values.. -�S9r�gh `"states also tlia�t "a number ;. of peop"T�"trougKL; the property at .a much lower price than its value' would be now under any kind of Toning" . Would i13r. t�Txi.9ht want .the preferance of his neig:bors to determin _e what price he would act for his house now on today's market, even though it coat him less 30 years gaga? I don' t think so, but maybe he would.. If so, I can recommend several 'eager real estate investors. lie. goes on to say, "no one is guaranteed any cciivvon ousamount .nf profit on their propert-lu." ._,�Here he states the obvi . ghat He e rx ht of every_VKgp .r_ty owner in the United States . to •develop to tha3r highest and best use of their property. The hfhesi:`aricZ"besC use of the _r'roPezty in the downtown area shou�r�be unlimited,,_ allowiny._the_,cicveloper whcit giver arnounE of I £"orie lie needs to ma).- a financially successful project. every btep of development is carefully. and methodically watched and governed by the City Planning Dept. and various construction �• . : nodes and requirements have to be adhered to. The esthetics of the actual building design is in the builders best interest, so, beauty, therefore, becomes a prime factor as well as an economic motivitation. Mr. Wright cannot dive one real_valid__reas..Q.n...._, against high-rise e an7:,j r, cani t log`service t...o ..a_n .o..n...e exec _- F..(P_ _ci_peoplweo.u- ld�wor�)c- i flow, it is obvious that Mr. Wright has gone to a great deal of , trouble and has written reams of material to help stop what. would be high-rise development on the best and most expensive property in any paarL of. Huntington Baach, and he has done this for years. Why? If anything, it would make his property in the Townlot area more valuable. So what then is his real motivation? ... ,�' !v:',k• ...,..,-........w..-.—..-.......,.. .... ...y.t..:er .. ... ., � • 'l', '. .. ....vi i•.;.'..:• ... :-V,'N'i.)'li• t , 1 ' Page Three . •• uestion. of us would like to know the true atheebest andtm most ex- Many ro err what makes the above mentioned P P Y f' agrees that the area across from the � Pensive? Even the city g pier is the heart of any downtown development and therefore is p raiser worth his .salt will . most• valuabie• Any real estata appraiser ro arty verify that statement. Yet, I�ir. Wright would have this stand P two or three stories. Mr. Wright c�ulannomoreathann �r limited ,to t Main Street and look over x thretteSknows bthis. glie says he is he cr�uld look over 20 stories. on the development and yet he says that theofeas down. residents for 1) Because are against high-rise are: read that objection, T foudthtatiasdatvalidlObjection. Was could be expected to accept he- really serious? If sJstateshthat as the esun dmoves st�edostohe Sun-Dial Principle which and shadows. The sun.does not stand astationary i ulde not yremain consequently. movng she one position. No Mr. Wrightr more than a few moments in any 1 lockage of that's not a good reason. . . .not valid at a11. 2) . . views and breezes if in t_he VTN Concepr'• liere of go again ' ith. the views: �I-'d'on't really anywhere in aryGranted, the views would that said the views would be blocked. Goa nion, the views ; be different, but never blocked- In mlooking buildings currently' would be a lot better than the trashy taking up space. Mr. Wright, however, doesn't have to..worry. The city has provided us witnarthword uakeoozdi.nan' a Damocles soothat hold allover our heads in the form of an qI be the buildings not "up to standard inothe the own areagwthem any torn down (at the ownery s expense income! tie ,.can with the vacant lots....: . this. Then Mr. aright. should be happy During just stand on Blain Street and ,get views all. day• the decreased time, the city can ' txy to figure out haw to make up meter rates or' charge tax base., t4aybe they' ll, raise their Papetl�aps initiate aview - • a surf baaxd taxtfor using the ocean. Of tax. for those who wish to look at ;all those trndht ha,vcQn�inually real and genuine concern is tow ana wh t•1r.—Ch 9 a drawing he sub- An.VTN Plane on l9c eightcofshis referenced letter mi`EFe`d otie Vitt Pla P .9 .aCe between the he would see that there is more than adequate. space 4: buildings for his breeze t blow. Ac fromuNorth,�5outh�vSastaand � the wind blows at differentfor breezes with I•�est. Ituntington beach would not be lacking If_breezes the VTN Plan or any other plan. Th•here. .r n_p §J1ortage t. 2b_is�' 11 in an high-rise detlelonment _that_? It aveoeblowvonlyis en Mr. Wright's �t probab'iy more likely'tttat. L�rcczes fail t 1 fertile imagination. I think you would have to agree that in the ion is as invalid as all the other so- final analysis this object has compiled against high-rise• called objections Mr. Wright j } Y •r a 7 1 `74- :,j� • (i�F a . t � ,4 t y rf• , � r -t 1 1 !.-• ttr i.r. K- ,, •�•'} ��t w` ,� �"!. t ..-rtf t,at1ZC' i+t ri tf / , t e ,. <ti. t�•A� j•�lf ��1 �.�„ �y�'�i•'�i � • t�*,..r +, 1 }. Y tt •i�l." �Y�, it , t i� 1j t} t .�r\ r fit. 'c ° t C•ti,1. :W, �, •}.r,1� ;ti,13; '�,��.� f1� t7'{ •�i�a 4i,� :�x,} 't�,'kpti}'}'f 5.,,.��+1� ��;, 1�i,� ��1.}�r��(iY.�y � .1��'S�,�ge��� ��� ski{ ,� •;��X �: i�i' ��� ;'•'1.•�, t 1,f •�.� . A ,{+L t t',R ,T�1 .I... ,pii.. �ii �• 4t i�f n%1� 1�" ,•c.,'].� '�- ,±14 �-•t.n {'t• 14 •1 t ;ic ,1.`. }},'• 1 ,• t�do i�{,ti' f :::*444 -{• ,i t ; .ia >4 Ott.��,1�q��� � ��.•"�)t� ��t��' ��.lt l"tf 5 k f. � �... l.w. ...1 'f � `�, T} F '� ��. .�t�Mt� ���� � `, ,l}IIIVf.A fi �� tl�7 i. 3 � � �t r yy,� t 1', � r.�s+ „�. ,•+�f:.� ,�, t � *t ,t:x . �} .{�.: ., 4 � Y� p 1 1'I •4 � '"ti f��c tit } Wi . "t, i t9 } ` '�.' 11 M 1 �• ,. ,�,j'y � . . � } } tti , ^`t\ ,ti."•�? 14} 3. t•�`alje„t ,1 �. �, �A ���S,, }y �.`,. �; „y .1t3 .�•� {�, �Yt y°j,�y � 'v1•t� ��1S t y7rx4 r} 5h�� i f 1� '� # }`S ,>.., �.i� , a.,,,,�Yti f •,f,�-.�� :�`�t t..•Y , � `{. ,� r , l t i� i iy s� 4 •V. i�, t` `, • i�i \ ��•A,�. 1 ``I.�- �,�„•1 .`try ,[t��t Z•L iy.y t�' r} 1 '+1 + Y �1' � ; ''tr .7;y �t }'tl , 1 �. y :,t�' •aw, i`� � t $'y`"� 4 1 �� •1��iY�#• � �" Ll5 YY r'i.,f f f r �' � 1 l� t�� ,t'� ,� , 4� t , ,t E 4 �� t� S•�y.�i.i. #-t`�.`, t+�•��i � `� t �1��+,�ts�+�`1��dii�•t'� 1��,j�x�����1�,�� ��3:.E.:}j"�"" �rl•`ry� �t1;1. �ti Ltl:• ��u t I�'44:�,.�i'.'4'.ct]1t.ui�`Y'��ili�ii..`i:a.•�...�..1�4�tF?Et��..b. .,�iril.:t„_ At$tl'�•�sC„�1rt..���1..•.at:�'_ ''' i' Page Four ` s on the as usual, in error again when hataythe Holt's Mr, Wright, is, 1979 , same page, below the .diagram ofVTNeP1 n as laas Dec . lie a� favorably of the were speaking 1980. lie mentrons the it is worthwhile to note some shortcomings ute 'in a fore it 100$�as of thisPlan_da �-'' the Urban Land Institute tthe VTN Plan ' a hack on the VTN Plan made shortcoming report to the city. imagination of the City low these was the shortsightedness tawouidnd cbe sad indeed toal challe gad ' Council who rejecte ou and ULI to go un Mr. Wrightand is, ,a giant statements made by t straight. VTN was, The, record must be kept sneering firm of immense. technical development: and eng Martha research. A world wide leader a n, t:he1VTtd3 to enter and creative talent., and Bob Terry encouraged Holt, David Holt (myself) of 11unt:in9ton Beach, wliet6 by into an agreement with the Clan at no cost to the city :and VTN..would develop a master P at noplan for' the pier and plan a specifica for all include in this master P of Huntington Beach was . to p Y downtown area. The City. round utilities and work withTV!M he parking facilities and underg plan reached fruition- in close .c6operation until ainstsuch lluntington Beach was to be'. `1edeveloped class-action lawsuit ag ears, while.'the VTN Plan was aside four a- period of, three y approve and citncofficers. and presented.; A contract was written, PP Don Bonfa and all other necessary urchase the the Ciky, Attorney, was to let the, developer p In this contract, ttie city, Blocking Mhe it had acquired in the., downtown .area while in competi� land the city thereby affectively_ . oaks went tion with. the Holt interests, Three_y-q -._._ llolt's ability. to consolidate total blocY.s. m fIc61 - re aced a plan ghat was truly_ -g~--t:he' plan, .pi•ok�ng while' VTN_P prepared. a ain-danglin9 on�yHin . was that the city st+aed sabatag .ng tace+ics, Someone wa`s.. g ai e-uskng"_del'aying '._..._. . to the manipulators whiVis, t-aP �Y. .. �_.__ The c3 ty was dancing to inject here. Suffice t�..s bra ngs. tao .long ind however, that is another story o say that .of thousands .af dollarcitn. wasemade aware,that it it t Y hundreds of man hours later when 2thmil'lion for unc3prg-r°und C would have to pay an estima�.�a.. in it decided to renig._on everyone of its ontractuatee- ark g, "` roua d declared the`g t:s wili�LimN�nd tlic lla.].t gad��rGPa�d) uncon�tut:£o�a1 'regimen _w Y _...._.. .._._-.--_-_ men£` wh3dhs own Cit At:torne P. reemen , 1#ut'how �. ,..__._.. -.-t- i -word or wrien a9_.__.�. and wouldn ,t_ 1ivc up__ p.._ s 11 study � Qut of It? one way would Ue to�spena Some more thousands �O payers money and hire a company to makr, a Stud can a£ the tax p Y a for it and shoot down the VTN Plan. You see. a feasability Y ' just about say or do anything that the people whop Y and make it want it . to. That's where ULI enooka less othan `'""` picture. Sure enough, as i recall, it only we weeks for ULI to come up with a cr Cil he �Ift, t - they, in and hog wash. As ttr. • Wright includes ttoeena5�ace" Baloney2a�7 , ., lac cited "insufficient visual57�� -a11 around the development. T ere is rlcnty` b fop � goes for thousands of miles. . have an ocean on one side that g "ambitious"' taw open does a high density development have to be? Ridiculous. ' t I~ ment was too Also, it was stated that the d� l°P , • .... ' - 1:1: .•! • . ..1'...... :1J•'.•.N,wt,.r.fcv.J.�f++..•.�•...r..r+•^^ ;+...� r ' 4 1 r rr ; ► � '� 1 { j � � t Mmom vl1 ' Trt+y1�•' Y +►� [ �ifir' 4i rrA Agap Y f,rin`e+ +`i •�*.,s'7 4''jJt.�.�l�;j.l]� 1 t Y' �.4_"y F 1 4 t{!YSy if3 A `�i7.�tj�j+.S� 1'•'1 iF4 a k }f;�('4! r01:'y"r [ Z �„ luu►. , + t!+ 1 rt � .► 1r,1� t. v,;h ` 5 C({ . ; a.. }t ;t\ #.� r}'y \. ct I' t .+� ,' ,• f g\ A. �, 'Jr i ► 1 tP. dY 1Y1 1 # t , , Y� ri t x 1 .�•74 "�v° tl '� �' � ' 4{ �i�;:�1�`t �t!.1+� � t t..t'A��'�'h�S. +i ��`y,� ,}� d:`t ,;y ,,� S• S�'�,�+�;"� , � ,�, �t.. ►u �.�},,,, �S�fi +� 1 � z t,,. �, ��'a'��.,I •.�:;ti �{1 !,f1,�,', a _' � •;r. .�. jr � �: , . ��i;y `�,[ ts; t s �: �t t;..t�i«ti ].�n;i f{{ � 'a��` t+�„y Fy';,� tt�G.f�,Ft�i4.. I���t: } �y•�, � a�V�bSw �,f:�l.s t.��4��t a�j4l is y `� y + L;r �! `� � :j�; j } !.f,'%�.e- sx,t ,Fad ���" l 'p alt,t 'F 7+ ,r Sl a., "pp kl r t, {y � j 'R Sz;��', ✓,' 1 { � ,L !`• -F; iiw � � � i �t .� t¢�,, !t�♦S�i��S4 r. 1. S}'x. �t ' �„{�ta i.{'� Fd'jC ;kl {4�4 3�'t,, S;f„ t M+ 4j# .,� � }¢:�.xh ': R Ie , r �.i{ � +��tS�'p,).r�1�1�� +'Its {,�t e, f `1�,�!:'C � �. �`t 1;� .it �`r)) ::r LS''�. r�`, Y '1 e, r.. •�., '� 1� s. �f. "SC��.� y , "�• •�� �k,�4, 7 � ;t '�y �, ,. � �� 1 {"+3r ififW}}#,� �y..,,y�'a`4\\r I.�,,�K t1'",{1 'l, �'h�,,�: 'yy15 A?�� .N+.;t�.Q.t F.,yyyy lx}�' t��; .yK � 1'• �:'r'J. .\fix{'},'�'a'` �`..�hty'�ir., '1' ,�.Z, Arc:"�� S[t`'�w i. ,��+�(1���` Mi�.�za..��'7.r '. +��r,.l �'l � •3�� !! ,� � , IA� 1., '� �.I?.'`'�. n}:,F '�. k+f����-' ��}'4 � 4 �,y d y, , d H. '�%�5 f�i +�} '�� } � t�+ i n�L+ '• 'i S 7.'� �t 4 1 r' /1 333 } t a Cray S "f°- it`s � •lF � ,'�.,� �a r�t}([ � �� .�:r{��! •„►'"'},xi,,�p.�j �. ,, , .t�, ;k4 1��,�+,�, ��i ��.,F�'''yyy �, '���{�S #.} ��t � ��' �� +�� �4 � ��- ,���e,]!�j ..,�+ �+;: �'1.� ���;y.; r�- �I Ii�Y��tt�y� s1. �tSL1�tt}����N�!�� �����A�s!i����`�i'�1����f'a�i � C3.',�� '�*,""i�tz'3C'!�`y�h� �1 P'�r;�'�if'� ' � 1��t �),x• .�V ,.� r: 1"age Five i What a critique!. It was ambitious, no question about that. 4 The city even voted to approve the concept of the plan, but then came the ULI report:.._ Compared to the expertise of the vTN,�be Uf;I Company is a paper tiger and a Johnny-come-lately. The difference between a Sunday painter and a Rembrandt. why was a study needed anyway? Simply to get the city off of a $29 million dollar hook. Suddenly all kinds of vocal protests were heard at the city council meetings. Loud_ yelling, cater lls boos and hisses, threatening gestures d the threat of physical coercion, was _allowed_and even .condoned-by ttie City"` ? Council.Police .were'nt tailed to maintain ox_der. `fit was-even umored fiat:speci.al�ghat e •were.giyen;to;High school and _ ----� gollege t�eenag9rs to come to the• maetings•.•and. vo�'cq,.:their + displeasure, at a plan they were told was bad and didi;'t under siand.. rtai'n':teac}iers�were iabserved:'direc 'ing;fhe-'choruses f bad mannered�yaung` ers= No-effort ways made by tie council to- re.store order. at these meetings. I was there. Police were not called. All people in favor of the VTN Plan were shouted dOWn. So, the city broke. its written agreement with us and voted against the VTN Plan. It was, and is, a great plan. You're darn right it was an ambitious plan. All of the _points ULI �• used against the�+1an can.t challenged. Tt was, and-is, an r outrage -against the truth. Fir. Wright says ;.n Item-5 on page 10 that, "alrriont everyone..wants to see the area 'rejuvenated j and retuzneA_,to...an,- area .of prominence":" Tto t!ver,-PeidP40,0Ie -Wd t -o rgjive'us the proper height tc do"i�. Well, this area would have been developed 15 years ago had the city and its agents and others not used every means and department at its disposal to stop us. The"•present disposition of the Citizen's LCP Committee is heavily. stacked against high rise development. Recently, committee merrier, Rodger Slates, made a statement to the effect that the city should get off our backs and . le't us develop our own property. We heartily agree, and wdwme his surpol'tl in conclusion, -I want to state adamantly that the zoning of the Huntington Beach Company's property and that of the City's own property in the downtown area is obviously a touchy subject for the Planning Dept. and the LCP Committee. Despite re- peated requests , we have. not been able to get the committee to discuss this area at the same time it discusses the down- town area. They have said they would, however, they do. not! Is it a sacred cow? Every time the subject is brought up t at a Coastal conunittee meeting the spotlight is focused on # the height limitation of our property in the downtown area and we are told that it should not be discussed at the same time, that it will be "discussed later". Later never comes' i I • M y i 3 v t i \ d •1� t� •t f` t i(Y 1l i � i.gyp •1.�.'.W. 'f�W.+ '',"Fr�°,'-r�.:F\�;r°'l.�`i'g''ty:t�b't{.v(t1�YvF�i �'1d`zt 1 a1�a�`r�a F�$.'i Y,..�Ga,�.a.•7M�''f{:.lu i R+t}1 f frt St1•t�'r t6ql"J��1*i}+t�('"�tt tYf j�._�/L{4f4{{1�? �i'•v 1 Y�?�+�a y"ti»,'r.Z?+S 1'a�.j��,y.x�i�V'1,K`'an{k,�Y�\1 t i.�t`t 35�f��y\''�y♦fF,M1'4#'\.�3T4�,..7•./•;1 y}1�i.�}`�}4:I5�i.t.•`''i.iry�"i'1.��,K 4�.•'.�,i'k9(��{�t�rq�t i'i�t,: 7.�(.1. i1'ak}l`Lt!,R...!.r'`�*b{lC J1{t �ltn.�v C"t.�`:1ir pi_�tt t',�i ti'' a{v t`�'.r R'. �y(1� I(WL M.4t }W`ll.�LI.�'T ,A:a vf. r St. r TOM, I—i C�{,,aL'r:��t,�tir!S k#.kN t)`rFar{'t,,i'',ra ff,�'t,�r".,a,111!'•'S !}{ aryTtji 77.: �r r•- 9; ,A r'rt s;,'1,`�ir r. � ;'r'atar�" { y�a 4 3 4 'i� i•riff, 'wl{a��, «il�+ }�t ,< } e 4 [[ ; "s\ •Frz.f°q7 v.;�\},. +'� ay� ut q r' y�' },',"t '��*,i'.''F; t,'x`^t�1.4 ,-��lr ��.i tq�. ..1,. 47 _2 ? � i�-. M1�VS.I~"}�'l 5:,,1�:.��� A �C y�,`5;r '�}�Y�.. 'R.'��!�}�E�,. a� �.�j r�5 F'r�,#"•�t " + ���• !.'�j;•I�'y �'a�:txY 1��.t'i3't"� .�`,h�+.ii 1i�i :3�.]f' l�Y �4 t tF!5 t ^ +YFE�',jf {l(j ��Stsalt' �y1 1 r�AF t,`,�'%� Y•' F` (.� r} r.%tr. tU'{y {; i�: t ?.l i'. y (t s.5. { i. 6 � S� 'r ��A�1 2i }, x�S { t.:tl'���"'4� irr Y'•. 1i..� �1'�'..";\�'\tty - tY�+.S��Y...4�,€.t' t���� fj. .A�t' {t9 x� .'�� �4 � ty�r�lc'4 kr, i ��{al.(; ! r %:,' t ,nk t Wt ��h.Y.;Y+Ai1. o i.+.1• i�.! �r 1 it tr w,� 'r� r ` .��ki +[ c Yr i 1 ":,, .t ;,, i•_ � �+ fir.; xy ss.•. y�d t:s., fr+�S:ya'r .,�y1'. � � L"' s .� ke�, ,I.f� ;�stti.�tFa;I11���r:,�'�. •:i: ��?,�� tl 17f r `"5I. Y �t•ri'xi�flj�x�.,.� }'.�:.ti�tk ''S�a� �"' �!}�.'D1r�'���'v"e��� a� �' 't �fi�',r ,��Y ;l� 'S f sl°a^'.k`V •1� } .,�{t t,��. ! 5 r x t t a•i f 1 Y { t'y :� °+.•¢.�' 'r}:r �. i!11'f s4.3* '4'�tr .�a� t,k>y��'°�. y��,��K#<,:�`F'�*'° ,F, .��,{� Ci" �, �y:.xr�is'{ Yi.;t',AC 1�i'„rk \'1��VrZ �.r��� Y1��V ,�,`&�tA+i���,iF',�ifd'�rl�= �5�,, .1.�.�.{�.1[}tyt'S:t r�,�R`�!a:.#�Clr+� j���.{rs,�r�s }ii� •��'�;t'4�'�";w1n��'.� �:�1�`;�T, =i r V++t Yx ,k .�����k 1�; � Via, l.�it A� , ;1°(, ,"�y `�•�1 r;� I�}i t..��y�' ��r 1i l .•r � •C..�'t rE. '� •`"� "q�.�. ..'r'Y�",i4r t�',.�t�v .�r,!{Qs ,�' .r le.' �. ..W;`:{ 4'1.y)`'t�°7ii,eVti °�r�'�• r�`t"!�c`� a�p�j3:.'I:d:{ri�1`'�yy�'}}',,FM Ts.�r .R ��y'L•S! 1,�,�f3{�'����J�� "��r �aX ,r� •Aft�},C� ��iF}.�}. i�.,yb�u.t '�.k�v 1`"it�S��'fs_� "�k �,��n��{�'AX�s,�yi!� ,a�..gt,,�, ;�� 'i�,31}e,pa� ; k' °t A:.rr.x.xk.t`Yef;,t, it`q„+e[���°.;Silii a: ..fr�'�YV�'utit8'h.�l� �-+t.�[`e."#���ft.k dt.}:�6.�ric�!�!'aa~�`,�i,;aa1"`✓��r.�rt'r9'lid:''.�ii��"�,.�a's't'r:4�}.f�'iXn'1'!i1,�1.,t,+N,i't.�'31�..�. �u.�'15r'Y'd.I�1>., I Page ,Six At, a City Council meeting in January they displayed a trans- portation depot rendering authorized by Cal-Trans, designated ; for the ;Huntington Beach Company's property. This subject was taken off the agenda mysteriously by one or more of the ; city council members. It was not discussed. Even when. we requested from the floor that it be discussed, nothing happened. We ask why? No more stalling. We don't want to be limited to ' two. or three stories in the downtown area and have all the i high-rise and most valuable zoning go on. the Huntington Beach Company's property. Is the city in a conflict of interest when it denies high-rise .for the most logical place' in the , d wntown area and grants. it after the, smoke screen has settled for its acid the Huntington Beach Company's property? Let's bring 'it out into the open. lie insist to know the answer to 1, downtown_property owners..were.'not-putor%._thus tecici g" -` comet tee' of the I.CP,, I%Yhy, wasn!t 13ob.,Terry's applica ian�to .' sit on� lie 'committee accepted�by' tie_ci.ty.? Why weren't a "fair pezcentage af �people representing our* interests appointed to the. committee by the City Council? tie feel that :it is r no accident, that there is an overwhelmingly biased panel of t; anti-high=rise people on the committee. In Item 6 on page three of his letter of 12-26-79, Mr. Wright }' makes this statement, "You also should consider tJ1e reasonable best inte_ rests,'of other praperty. vwnersrand_ ar�a-residents,". lell'�' mr.-0 *ig' E;_though you are wrong -in almost everything you have said in your letter, that one statement has some merit. It' also works both ways. The 'area residents should consider the reasonable best interests of us the downtown property owners and not deny us the basic right to develop our property with high-rise. After all, we would not harm or deprive any one else of anything by building a beautiful development. Just because some one doesn't lire tall buildings is not a good enough reason to 'deprive us of our rights! After all# :we just want to build on our property that which our alleged American freedoms guarantee us, Wa challenge you td. name one way that we would harm or deprive anyone else their rights or frecdom by .our development. Ile have been trying for 18 years now to develop a project that should have been finished in two and a half years, at most. tie know that the clock is stacked against us. The entire arsenal of one of the mightiest corporations in t e warld is using every meaH i.i�t-its-raisposa].'"to 'atop�us;liutinayk�e;jiat�',~riaylie;som�3� one who xeads�tNis`kYill� havca geiillc wrestle with their conscience, get tired of being puppets and get right with themselves and say, hey, I think I finally get the message. I 'm going over to the good guys: Remember, your sense of decency is our only chance. Think about it! What we have been saying for years is true. Present events prove it. Thank you! Most Sincerely, David Holt t 1 i r Y •i�+ �' 4 ��� Rol` `►'}tL��t �` ;lfiig5lV-.p. •�.,.�Yf �F!',�zP!`3f S;S't�v,' 'y� fCS4' t� }�- •2!�"4�; 3}�`'St5+1�"t7`/'1 r• � MON, ,.:7 1 r�r w 1r tt y r �k,_; _i'i f.1a .v{•f �., x�• u. 4 r}�"9. 1i.`••� rtY TS L'�T,' �d)a **!! ,1a i,. W. y� r.li�' rz + `t 'k a 1'. +k J A��• . .it"l R i �:'6i•�rtt7� . ter''. : ^y y�bi3sl it �i gt 1 •.?5'4j k 5,Y's��- Cr ¢;k',G .! ;t•,i, 1' 1 ' Sk �( 1 '� l•.,. i+. t 43' I .�(�C� ► °3 f, �, . +( {'# � Yr. �,jt'^Y ^,y[r VS} ' tt a�• � `+t,lt 7 z.�' i{�3'�.eG a �. �.a�.f�°'.� j�,�,,a,�t, j�T{r�r ,�`ry 7,, sp�� P �� +tt„ti1 f''t �sr• f ��}c r ,e ?'}� #,��''� v.]ix � ;���t�,�t�`�?� ��i� r�;>�•�'����j ^°��' �"t 1�'��`t.,�,�,r .r' ��,_ �,} !. `incl•�, �,;k�;- :!,�r ��. �5s' j +�t. � d�c�t �5� �F'�� ���' F+ �4'+�tk.t �t,�:�1 :+�N"iu��«��.5.��'tSltLh�w tr'�i•.���� 5�'��'Y�ia'k.� 'V�i�:`t�t:,i1.,k^ti�#�:.`�Lir„ Y�'-+a..rrt;'SirV��3�.,�13�'���� _�tv y..�a` �'�j, +tYS�yj �S +y" .�'�,' 1( From: i. _nard bright 12"'2(� 79 �•o: ,June CataIano, u'... stor 606 - 15th St. , H3 926 8 LCP kroBramI planning Division. ~ City of Hu.,tington yeach sub eat: Downtown Land Use , Planning Dept. City References: -24-?9- 1. Letter from Leonard Wrightuject: Downtown Land Use, Dept, Sub,�ect: of ,Huntington Beach, t to PAC and hS Planning4-76. 2. 'Letter from Leonard '11tigh 6 on .redevel-. ro °sal for the pier area S- VTh's preliminary, P p anel discussion in 197 Hef. 1} • 3. planning Uept draft of the ULI P A, n the Ii�3 downtown commercial area (summarized 1» ApP' o osa1. opi g rovides background comimentsl)nofm hesDowntoYn Study krea: This letter P c subareas (see F g recommendation$ for. . stri along PCH from 6th to Goldenwest (PP 3• 4) Q' one block P �2 old Town (P• �} above 'Walnut and between 3rd and Lake' (p. 6) residential t Existing t the The half .block fronting the west side of Lake from Hartford o alley above orange (P• 7} �Uown town riain Street commercial area (pp comments widespread citizen input received while: door- t• t and old 'Town areas and subsequent contacts and knocking In the Town lo } phone conversations.: It also lenincce gSaineduwhileoparticipatingein• My comments also..reflect experienced area-related activities:rtinF in: 1971s Townlot zoning issues .�. 2-• : member; of multi-story' cctosittea 19? 3 Townlot residents for their views on xowrlot . 1973: roh�-Y surveyed land use (team of 4) references el tensiVe survey of Townlot residents. on (PhC} .1975� 1g76: represented 'rownlot homeowners on signatures in support of the concerning Downtown commercial rresei lopment 1976-7: we collected approximately 5 proposed zoning for old Town s reflect the views of In my opinion my comments and recommendation area* an overwhe lming number of residents in the surrounding t. t` r L:• t t' j + t •Z � j� ``�" 4 � t"i i � .1 a ti a wt pyt;'c'•. t Y 1 { 75. k't 1 `�+� � "'if��, ttt, ti .rx.,t >r+•+"gt,�r., +rt-.' t 4.i'Y';S' .s,'{ �. z! '1. 5++.i ,,^}� i + `{ 3,t .,,t'71t.. -:ti^r f,' L �. iYaj �...re. h+�"dl;, q ?,� t p��, p�`f �'.I. a`xs• 4 bbb �!��t3' 4 + 111'.f �, �j �� �.tt�!`l� . M c+ 5'Z��,",+� .'>y�'!'t ��.:6'�;r ��• ,,�f��k � � �t"'t``'}� »1 i�* ° �ti� l •�y. �c t e�; `1{�.� .,� `'1+,�•�•�,� '� `�,' . .,#.�" 1•.i�, *y ,, `• ? � 11't'�+. ,�? s .� yy �' t„+t a a� }r,.�'. „•.. t: ►ty i � ¢} ,a """i' ti # 1 {r 1 + ` 9a.i{ £. � t. � '+a': �'?''t{;�,'if� ,T i' t r�.e�: '•�! t{« t„�5� t��ytf+l G''.v�'t",�s+t�i I:�K•t.,� F'" ���€�''�'t° ��'x° f'};: `�3ii�„i �rt �` Y� 7��-• + ' .1t1��,'iX�M +, �i 1�� r 9- dt�. �"•t ;� .c U}4 � � ,�f ,,�.Sr �f.� 4����k'i{ �'« `' �'�1r '+!';'. �, :�t•V'������t i .� c s±�yc„t+.i � +�' �:1!! � t �,'�;�+�• y �'�. .d2r}�'!».'�„�° ;�+ �+y #t + t{C...• 4? `�•r`f{ ; Ivy, l ¢¢Y ';� r..'`�.-. d t T,:4 '�J r Y4;;i..+ ti p', . i;'�5p+, .ru • �. j$4 7,Y 9 y,�a '�Tw i3 r' �, ,, ! N M,j k,`t�,:t{�•� �:i1'��z+ a��`��•�l Y'� ,I •#r�y`� ;t g'� ��i�"� 1 ���,;t�"�� i""t�{;'S'» r'R�`�a�!'-' 1F �k�, ��.,���;R� '. �.. '�'1A - "� w � �` ,`yf(,��t �.,��"(? t,+ �>h�L'� • ;... :"t °i �.A� F t,�t�t�it�,s ' ^�F, �'4t+t ; .{t.r, 1.'_A#!E}j� y t. `}{ + +, y d t5.`.+'�1����`R� t4�.C!{�3:��}�1 ,lt f�r�';"r' �� ��� � '1� 7t. ,,1 ��!/��il�� � r.. i�. 7-• j `�• i • '�t t d �•� i �` } �i r �#KS #t .`4tr�yy'} ,.d` to t . ` T+ "t�(y . }V� A� � ��,j �1 4 a St+r,.� �,, /`f'1,(� .V � 9 y •'(#��,t, 3yt { 1,f;., i ><.. 2 h �;� L. �t! lyii i `,"s''° .sarT'�1;. fy,`� �'4 t.r. +"k ti `+�' W. i i!_ xi_g k • F tsiF!{.v !�!'t+° 1. + !�_M; M Inn Ct- a; .. 1 � �� t ,�' � '� S�}'f i� � ~d �{I 1' �, , �, � t j��� � VY. ■-� e` t i„ r � L-d•.� �,� � � {*'�. � S +i lt�kPR.I+ � 6 � ' � , l• r� i '�.,'� ��.�l1, 1w ' �,re �',� �4R[ 4 .¢�'1�� r +aY' �. � ( � t.. � '!�'�� � ?�►d�� S� °�r.w� fiZ:���.'ti .€ a:��.r�� *t�� c �'ti{�; �� ��' �� ''� .,�1� . �tY;�+� '�A� ,l�j ��%A iYr}�r �'� �,�,�, ' 11 ti'j� ?. � � � �37• "�� .�j� ..ij',7�+�N1t�'i� �#4�� f�+ '�M t �, ��`! !.�i Y� iy .� .�ry. '!�,f� � J �i�q,t 1.°...�' x�. �g S1'' �l.i•a�,l��-�qa,�;7{:y� � ,} �`� 1 , r,t� �#L.LY`S.. •,F� Ak +�.fn�€�_�°•- -f t. s � f� R�S,l,• t'C'� °.r `n- ^�a �....'�.'"Yn �A .,.9 9j'`,�. k's"!� s'Y�>!+`��. �, .K� ���;i�, ..{'� t . �����3 j ��'� .n �$� �#!•,., � '�,r,, � �+' , µ t � ",�,( �,'j stet., , .�.•�,7t•�}��r�rx " t r +,yU ,... .. '''���14.'L L°i. ,��`+�. t W � + ..� l� �, y .� T N •p � .,il.at ,.,...jf � .f{� ,y •t..p; Kd 4 j rt �� F'' t ti3.txa t���ika��{+ .� } '���,�, ��y". ��r!.�'�� t,��+, f'ytr t���:`r' �'�"r �!� � Y,I'�� •''+:� `?�}1 1 } "' ;t, ...�'�il���� ��� ' {�� ,t „� #"�", ��.4ja'*�:,1 tr �ti� . ! f.• f �" . w ! S `7,,1 ° �i,`v�� ';, ,}��+�n �t��C �,13.1 ��Ctl+Lu�� �!���� 5`.tSilYila"�il�jl�s,�� { �C�la .� �. yl C• � „Si' [fi!,t .,. 3� `F3. .t�,� s•. F � . f ` i f i }(try "� `, • /1 /, / /r` 4�Y•* �M .S,x, `y j�� 1t,,,/�. •.•.= 1~r• A t-�1 '•' ,� .; , W `1 •7.Al� r. oil •,iI '.� �' ('�1'•�/+,1.� 'j`ft. r ,��� -1��' '•�. 't'+i ''"'�� J�'4'\y .'�yi• •y yl • `�4y�"ii. �i \ � s•t\\It� •"�� ♦r All f' •L� r '�. r. fi -T, No ,? tR t r� YC \ ,� :�,? ` c `1ji•.�\ `'-'�/'`; • �:, i t •�.. e+ ., - fir' Y�1 CJ's\ �i ,�;./ t, �'.` ♦ '\�+.. � �.•�/..''''\�_ ��n•'��.�_j�,� �s �< D,t;'�r��,•y' -�z 1y•,,,- f �.y ` 4 T ,••��i777 = �. 1 f: s, 111 a 1' `� �.'rr "�'' Cr r ,�•\ �`�J�, \,�+..1, \, �lrr^� •��� +.vim .L�s.2�� •+sr+ �!►I -t►11��r�i� ` �y� 'C `t �2. �``\ `IY .�+ w ! ! �`�',� �/ G" t�... , 1 +•i.-•y-•`' r^•N^ f�..�• rx`.'°'fl 't _. 3�---a---• . f ., '950 j ,n I • t a' r s R �.• C 3 ,a r J s _ _ .fl _ (- -'"i s r •� r";,•,�"�, Al �i�•j•'f�„� � 'C1 , 1C �r�•'a� ;s-L:i• a rJyTgr^J/ 1 (.- � Z . OLO �V 7NS A15 I' RAN Lf to ;�• M,+ (,t"�. -�li"i.r-r'-`•�•�.."':;-i,_��.._.t ;��_— +�.f.,_,.,�...,.._J jT•,, U Q , .i• 1 Cpj Lj 1(r artt -1 _ .1 �� j - �+-_ z-{• ! r 6L-9z—Z _. ..Z_ • o— ven pu M uei _�.►off;r .; #• • LLW to JC. iiosintown id Use. f.N1 12-26-79 ' 1. One block strip along PCH from 6� Goldenweot (@on Figure 1) 1.1 Backsround and comments 1. ti_large _maJority of area residents are strongly for a low height limit. k1ost may prefer no higher than 2 stories, r. 2. GoodAeye2"opment�Is very L'easib?a and profitable usina- a. lo vi height limit. This includes preserving views. 3. Any reasonable zoning -can-be accommodated, By the law of supply and demand property prices will seek the level that it's profitable to buy at -- or the owner chooses not to sell. A number of people bought the property at a much lower price than its value would be now under any kind' of zoning. 4. You might correctly state that 9QV612Rment has been i.nhiblted in this area for several years, But: values have continued to rise. . 1 recommended in Jan., '19 76, ,that this area be removed from ` the redevelopment area so that it could have been developed ' (p� 3 of my 1-26-•76 letter) . ., , . Noy ono'.'Vis Ruiarantead any given amount of profit on their property. No. matter what the eventual zoning, w reasons le limits, property owners will be able to make � substantial profits. t 6. Neiare you able to. do whza'tever you might want to with your preEerty. Otherwise there'd be no zoning, zoning can e c ang,y . You also should consider the reasonable beat interest: of other property owners and area residents. 7. Allowin multi'-story would be- a foot; in the.'door. assurar oes given at one time, may be,forgotten IMF on and'•may mean little to new 'bodies (since, they.'re not the ones giving the assurances). Itla better to set guidelines at the start, so that citizens don' t have to spend a lot of time being constantly vigilant. Without this you have little future control. 6. It's better not to have toultistor in blocks mmediatc adjacent to- rggiidea tia1�ag• The original Townlot Study bald that this area Win the poorest for multi-story of the < areas consviered. But it wan considered primarily because some property owners were pushing for it. 9. Citizens don''. want multi-story near their residences because: of shadows blockage of views and breezes if in the VTN concept. it causes pressures toward developing at increaaed densities. :here's a concern that this is a forerunner to other activities that may make it difficult for resident ownera to remain. One downtown property owner (commercial) ,vaid { that after we get the VTN concept, we'll go to worm on the Townic►t. E E V k�'WN } 1 1 \ c Y} > y 5 � ,. � Y � :.• L` t A �SYt �l17171��� M� ,S 1 4 11 • • • I • • I • . fJ' _ • 11 I • • ( 11 � i It • — • 11 11 • • • , r 3 i • • L • • 1 • � • i� ' J' — • � i • • • • • I tl = • 3 f r • • •11 : r : it 11 11 • • 3 OIL S • • • S • 11 l • 11 S • •- • • \ • • C S • f • • ♦ • I 11� . • S S 1+ = S • • • � • i � . 7 • It • 1 1 ,. ail 1�1�.•'�,1.+1 ;,i, �r Ir '� Al. � y �, tj r b a �>7w .j •1Y 1�1��.I�`� tyy���.1\ X 1 � M � 1i.. +� , �+r • i- 3) '! qii 4 �,• � t'� +�1 .'� i��1.1. ;, 1.ir +.+.• 1i ti •�,•'r �` r s,� r�r y��'� .��� .�.�; .�' � t� � '' �'• � L� T��a1 ;� � ti�j�j t;�� ►i4' �+` NIX �r � '�' �� �i'�� •' � ���. '�� � �i.���. ' � 1 X Y t � •��,��4� 1 );4,�,i ,f� ti`ti• � t 4. .� � �,') � �,+ �5 �� \' t4 •t` � �f1, �} >};''+ ++ tI ,� 1} + '' � �! "7,� �jP� '� �;�tk .� �t 1•�, '�'t�, 'SIC � 1 `�. �.�i� � k�t� "i �� � r �tl �� ),4��• �' rr, `� x} �1. v' t , � ��j` 'y ! ,k . t�t . xS �•,1. I i, ,�• � t� �`�' �� '+`t� •� .1j t 1 � �yx �''11l!j, rt � �1. ` '�, �. ��.�e�• 'r a � y` t i �, c,� � ����`� � , M •f `� �� 'f�r,��`lQ�ctr Q� t �� �,t Ott •� .� �� ]d.i • ;`.���. r}i/ J 1 3'��`� t� �� R`,�r� + �q \ �' �C �' i*���'t i �:i " 1.+ ,� i` i `ea ,1� 1� t 1 � /( 1 X Y � yi�� F e.5� �1k�� .�; t � �1��f ��X�k ', � i � S� ��`r +�i �1 1• } •°I r, �ia) t, � .e.. .��/��.til.�e ��iltt �. .�t6. ! S�� 5(iS!'.k•�r7r ,'Rt.."1L'i•�+ i'$E..�` t.N >�Its r i r • . -79 LLW tc JC. Downtown (*Nd Use. -5- /'1 12-26 ' 2. old Town on Figure 1) 2.1 Hackaround comments 1. In 1946 'parts-off huntington Beach-1were zoned wlthout, regard �. for existing land- uses. For example, parts of the: Townlot that were primarily homes were zoned R4 and R3. This, of course, later created problems. These problems could only, be,corrected to the extent possible by putting in the proper ; zoning. Areas improperly zoned included: s : . Townlot (area above 01 in Figure 1) . . 'old Town ((D on Figure 1) . Above Walnut and between 3rd and Lake ( 3 in Figure 1) . ' 1.. 2. In 1973-76 _the Townlot was land-use planned, then zoned such that: .,. homeowners Rot a 'Measure of`' proteation against apartments `f beingbuilt next to their�hc m_es;. ,Thus fewer homeowners were forded out by� the encroaching apartments. . Sinee . the t: Townlot has. the highest concentration In-the, city of.,those on.lower income and the elderly, this zoning was signifl- cant in enabling the elderly, those on.lower income and others to stay In their homes and remain near the ocean. • homes..were allowed to be built on 25 foot lots. This provided a profitable development for developers and upgraded the area when compared to the direction It was previously headed. 3. Townlot;rigs. then,removed from the Coastal Commission permitting process. : { P"�r• 4. ld Tow ad,'s` ewha� •the .:same'`s,itua6logln s •I'Q,pr,,�lo.t. :::"1* f as a gh number of- elderly and lower-incomed In late 1976 Old.Town was jand-use, planned and in earl 19'7�i zoned similarl ''to' : the Towhlot.. :.This. provided the same benefits as Tor the Townlot. . TheseAbenefit's and the existing zoning l should be retained for this urea. S. Old, Town should have a neighborhood park In the vicinity of Delaware and Chicago. Using the standard of one park per quarter section, old Town should have 3 parks- but putting a park at this site brings the total to 2. r : 2.2 Proposals li 1. Retain the existing land-use and zoning for Old Town. " 2. Support the providing of a neighborhood park in the vicinity of Delaware and Chicago. t �,.kY"il�s.;`:..G:-1.:+. ..., ...4..'-. ..... .,.., . -t:. .S".,. _..,... t'. .. ,., -.t, .... ..... .. ,.f :., . ,...... cc v'...•.., tN i.. .17•+H W.....•++.^.+........wWt " 1 4 r ; 1 " t 1 Lim to JU. Downtown Lt'0*4i Use. -6- !"1 12-26-79 3. Existing residential above Walnut and between 2rd and Lake (0 on Fig. 3) ` 3.1 Background comments ' 1. This, is one of the. areas mentioned in 2.1.1 as having been .f linproyerrly zoned Iii 1246. This area is zoned commercial, but Is completely residential with the exception of a doctors office in the ground floor of at apartment building at Walnut + and 3rd. _ -::max•:, •:' .., 2. ' It's better-to have too little rather than. too much commercial. J if we have the gas station on every corner concert, all , businesses are marginal, p&ofits are low and many businesses border on bankruptcy. We want strong, profitable, viable businesses that are more likely to continually• upgiade the area. Zoning this area residential; (in keeping with its current development) helps to meet this objective. 3. Some' time ago -Patti Jewett submitted a, petition` signed 'b all •t:h'6 �proper_y owners in this area requesting�the zoning be residential. This effort was discontinued when Patti sold her home and moved. 4. Angelo4nn4*,Lil Jana, Hinaldi�-and' the` Oeo 1� on=�2nid�.Str`eetw`o'n Dec;; 17 =t 1979. received a change of, zoningr.fo nd Street above Walnut. The new zoning is,. Qld Town Specific :Plan District r Two.:1zoning, This allows homes on. 2 foot lots. and u to } triplexes on 50 foot lots. The City Council vote was -- R ` 1. 5. Since hlb-area was zoned commercial, people have been unab e t:o' uparade-�'the`lr residences beyond.-,a certain ,per Gent of the value,.of their structure, or to build see0 rding to the eaistia u'se, of the land. Those who wanted to sell had a diff icult; time. ;;.: residential.xoning 6. This. fits_ in';wittit+_how 'the,-`area ,is develaped -'and allows people , on low and moderate incomes to continue to 1 ve ere. R: 7. I ke` Strecti- in, this area-'thould be zoned residential so a_s 'to avoid strip commercial, and since Lake is not he maJor thoroughfare that should support commercial to any j great extent. 3.2 yrogosale 7i 1. The zoning above Walnut and between 3rd and Lake shall be the name as in Old Town :specific Plan District Two. ; F f: 2. Eminent domain shall not be allowed. " t ,s is "t ' i 1 a�t ' /1 . •11 S 1 ' 4• ' Y r �y v�}•fw'� 4•Jf 2i}'� •�, :.y "AEI. 5,�.�•ti ,s�X��4 k;�9 rr":,"Yi�: •Y tAA ���yp�A.�t .• 0 7 WX '. •��`� ��drg5>i• Cal xt / � c I' � )jl � 7 �� �� 4 ��� '��"��'��•�� '�i}�?+t � .T'��F`�.��t�Jy#� it ,'E t ��y���+da 1� � �;,, ; � r,� y�� t ��'{�i�'�t1 1,y 4� `"A.f �,�`•: �� f �' � `t.�'e�' ` � F� .!� � i[J� } +y �y�tw�r r�. �'����,,'� 1 .t ��`},r�� '13A '��t.} ''�t�ti�'f d}3'ir�:+i2 :�� �ttlt i� 9 •� � `� t r �c.' t�, �jj � i, y , ?� ,�t r -,I '�t� t�'+� •„t ,'�' 2���J��7!fi� � t '�� �' `.�� �,��� `' ti{� ���i�'' ��� f,�,: � t3's��, . �� �S; .��7t t �`�i t'LS� 3;� ',1 ;� a 1 �!►� � ,''4,��� 'Xt�'T �;,t V,`# i� �, �i t i �1 � p' -i.t ���, gj 1 +�t R '•fit, t!'� �"+4 < 1 ,�' � � 4� / a�Y �'�' •#q}'1 "t 4'�d"" � uk. 1��l ,�w�. � t I '� z�,F� '�� 'awl�1 , tr � 6 '� 1•� .�,��, t 4,� 'i}�i l �9�i Y�n�'�t� r�St 1�. ��� !• � ��.�r `��4 y`Y S '�i� � Z� ,�' 't�'t}°'� �- ,y r r •i)$� p , t " r t ,' _ �y,, � ; , rrr <? It ,�l •j � r ,+ / y(��t � 1x' �.,yt� 1 1( r ''t.��' �t 1 �t�• ` � ' ��• y�. � �. �','�1�', 4. �. ��' f l�,�f`� •11 l +t .} '� 1� y ,'f; � `a�y` 7j. i i� t� 117•' :�� +S�.Ii1 ���t A � t ��'l �5S4:,'' ��}} �� ��� ,r �f[+ l�} r ,! '� .� '11, I'rfy�YYt,q' ! d7t/��@»�r1t'.Yv lr �'.: .�! ti, 1, r•, " V I. 9�, 3.x .�a ��,°.t? A.• i)) S't ,*,tl1K'�ir1,s..;, .�•11'a.,t t�Yl; ._41'kY 1Cfr' �'fw 61 4 t t� { • S S • f S • '- k, 4 s 1�• t � • • 1 1 ► • n • It 1 • • � 1� ,,rpY ����r�� • tl 11 •S � �' �i'1�{�INrI. Y�' • i l • f 5 2 • i j t,� Y�Y'i�St''�"" ��Z,y • 3 S t • • , — • • .��� �� 1.rK h L'Sr�!k si'Yq }} �ILI., tin.7L A4,ti4 r•L.b' ftN l� r tit y 1i �4,+ V !NA ,u 1 : '• ty{� S' IIL.. 4 , �{I• f � r•+^r i'.'It Z .'' �'•49 •fr `y' r 't 1�,�� y Y 0 �, i I'i 'ly• A' 1' 'G "•'a rP- iSi� +j� L� 1 .�,� • �.,• 7{ , 1� Ya w1 •tij t h NAM) l� � � ��. ` 5 w, /r���. i M • yy�ly ` C;t ', `' •l�rtl �!`r}� .'` j '�` ;I .'i}'(4 tit :'t Y}}� 3�j � } pry�,� + `� 1�1 .it. Il,, ��.�'•.' 4• \y�1��- �� ���4a j �1�};C�1�`�!1 1.; ��IIU���+��, R�f, `r�,�{}�i)��-1 •Div J :7. �� •� �� � i�'�` ��T.1 Y; t I-��, � j�a �'� '.�'' 'Y i. '�� k.(� y� y � �� � tY► 1 91�f� t � r,4'4 ��. j'','���d' Y'�,y t\�1' `S, 'rf t ���' �� i '{^ `�, �.' �` ���t Y.3 •1f., 1 ���yj 4, ! � c t��q�� ? i, Y'�i� � �+��y T�, .t�t' �;���� �t 3 �" 1�' `11 Jt���=it, ��S' i+� �t�,�r'� t, /y 4,, �y` � Y �4�,,,1.'e,;'',"�•� �' ��'d �,�• , ry, �`t; •# � � , � �1�'!` . 1�'iY4.at,,�!`�S� .i� 4 . 1Ap�.. �F �+ �' `�1t v4 f' ��, ti j,�I + 1 •� 1 "L w � � / a,'i 1.� yv,11� '� t:- � �jl 1 Nil .Y = �' y�},.y�� •`�t 'tl,r � � �����1SM it��r4 y, i?� TM�ejr•'t ,� •4. l` "i,pq, 1 �t, y !�� +Y s� MIA Atr: S ,'� 't�{y• 1 "'►� '�� � t C..�. } to r'�.. , '� - • `t� � �, Il•,� ��il Y�r+��r{i/ C 7�a•'� F R• 1 1 �� �fr�� i •,i j ^ yt. • 4' �1. 'y =ltnnf f t �f'4 F 't' Y� 1. • Y Nit �. ,flat t `r � j `I��� .'� . S't .� �• �;., � k �'F1 1 t �, ,.� '�i � ►,31. �lh � ..�+ Y` iii���„1•'dl � �;#��Fi'� iy i�.5 ��t ► C�'!'rf{l� �:"�.. ��� �' "i �.' '� "' � \r'ti. M ����•i�r��i`��y��-1�\ + ''t t •.;� �"�;,'�Fi���,t�,�i��� ,1 ,.1�. 4�1 Yid„ ���<� � �'• , »� �v ry += f �, ',x y '�, t'11.'t • `�t`t 1 "t4 {t ? 1"itli' 1 e>r,Y...ti'ti {4. Ala°uy�.,.,� `,t4 '`;il�!.1' 1k+s)i : LQi: + • ` "F k ° t' ` y ♦a 1. M' 101 i - 11� iz -26-79 • LLW to JC. Downtown Use. -9- a`-VTti•- ro osal uts on the 10 poretherenC�.rel roeeeto~ b. Th r acted commercial market dem- area thru 1- 90 TheVTN your demand figures call for 795 rooms by 1990 ; That creates phasin hotel would have $022rooms of theeplanning Left draft of the proms s. (pp 21, ..� UL7. Panel discussion) . t, sa would use up so much market potential VT1r s proposal nearby commer- i that not enough Potential remains to develop the eial areas (and well only have partially we've committed substantial redevelopment Problem that w ' funds to) . (L" 5-14-76) • c. Xnsuffialent visual o en s-R, Viewed from inland+ there's too much bulls and blocking �of ocean view in this �^( much (I,L1�) .5-blook area. �;. .,�, aokin the view' of the 'ocean' the V,rNeproposna7. ern tidings extremely hardboiled agPect of, th the complete plugging-off of the Isacriticaloforaitb value) tc;:the , ocean and the pier. Which • i have a very depressing effect on the possibility- erpress for rehabilitation.(ULZ.P 12) ` could .roally sensitive op 3 of this very tt sho ins area in one of the 3 I f.. I;.were a merchant in thQ Pp was going pecialty .shops+ I'd be most upset if s -and somebody. was .put this concrete barrier between me and the ocean, .; (ULI, P. Rho VTti' 31Qn Mould dramatically change the orientation of . d.' 'hh�ea thexistILL ea�cmunit • :_ rrhe :VT14 conC t' down t `f'iambitiaus ianless.,you re think3.nB j The VT plan. is extremely aeabana Beach in } '# of MakinVTg the entire beach area lute. Cap Rio. It see we a little far out. (ULIf P. 21) . tthat r sAf It's ion,s�d`vantA' a' to lteo downgrading more of � th�etihee�eunaiitiyaoia'e•ter. , suspect that you ll beregent character..would .be there+ and keeping more of the .P . It,a extremely difficult to your advantase in the long fro act in a central. to imagine building a brand new P J (ULI. P 7) . 2 rehabilitated area and making it successful. 11'1, 1; :µ e. It too much densit for this amount of urea. (LLk' } specific problems include: too many- people in the fade txian aant�estiIIn $Ezk ��structures. This might pier area from the prop �. conflict with other uses (beach and specialty shop oriented) . nffic con c�st.ion and circulation (including not having . incorridors near • . i ._._........_....,.•..,w+.., Wur.r:..a:.,t:'.... tit':tr•wtx•':..i.... s,. .. .ew+.-.. a 1 '&�t1f3��r�t�t��3�'�'.''#�'��'�11 ice' , t z'� ;� � ,�o�, ►"�''t}' .'�' !�;&'�' �s��v�`�"���,�' '� r.t ; ''�47 fir'y1,yl)r,�{<,' t`�,i .,�yF ire t t 1 ��rq' � gl F►ia uiYi �t?�'l': t '4Li+'��}� � �'�•}.}..i 3 - 'r }• ��� - . ,[�i�r.. P.. t4,}� �. . c 1 . i� ,vTR ��"�t"'�" �S:d ''�t!`;}��• k� ` ' T, .jy �l:i.. r. �., y t.c. til�•,y4. ^y. qt C���ti'.. yar�d`�T . ��'i �j�a�.n..pk;..�j }'ti�r ����� �I��A1��'� NJ, `��kl"t` t ,��t,��SldCl�it�{t�i��tw�{..� •� ;,.pl�y� Z. j} � ,. k,!',1�'• '4•.! "'?Yra• '�(ty'�' !`,.'S 4v., ` •;�;�. +y •ytt't 7,r'S � {i�"f Y� ; 1� la',�`{"� T, ^{ti Y t V 1 L r! n .= T•7 f ti��l � F " 7i,{, :.fi t, R..}. \'i { .r �,;. k.r,•a14 r. t i 1 ' 54:"�1v'4,��1�,}"'''� 4•�.�� i4r 'C' ��U ��� !,Q ,,t}M° i ��`, �P �,R't � ��",«,t � �• :t'7F��t �,��} � \��*'Y , � w t•k �� rYY ,�. * r. r. ,},",�!_ ?c �t � :R4�� '��.t�f, � '� '+"t � �}'S �j T"y. t� .�'�1 �,'S Y\a S�� ` � � �' ..d t�i�}• �`•,IVr 1 *. ��d^ i, l ffi''� �: '�x�+t`[� .`�F'l�a{y='s� i�r+ '2+�it�:'f' �,y�' �: ' � � E .�'�t= �y l��r' '�� y`*�i �'��`"Ft. e.'.•fit+ t ��'�,1 ':X lt�t �' �#'>I`;`z ��`t? 4 c t� �. r a,i�`'a'3 t •.rr:�� �, t•�'Y j � �r q;� � ��.y, '? F t ti' ., t r �� k j; r; •"i. e�hhSS)f(L,,. •�s (yA�`�a;4'� ,`�'{(y�, �r(j"yy � 'j�ry s'�1i t��Ny'e�� -'4, i�: `ifd},yF1,� .�� �wr•1' ` ` .�. ti ..kl� [:rdy r�,,,. �F Y.!4..0 �:�<T;s4�4a7`i3.. �f,.a�'tii l�il.'Y^lYt� i�43r. ♦,�k=' • • r • • �„_«.fit' ^'t r ' i .r. • • + • \ •f ♦ Il • • L F 41X♦ ' L+ t r •f • L t S i • t ��'� • mot t • : • y • f ► rlA11141 RTIATMM •� ACp rL i '' • yr F • • • t itl • • •• • A n L f f d'b,�'Y rA • ; z s r .1 t rut • t'".;� ';.`•`','1'^ ;_�_ i 1 • • 1 •L ♦ • a • , • r Y L a f,Oq���: r, ��"'^'il . I , 0:A + }r� +'��S t i • + • i r t • ? t �. y51�$T .• � c ISiFy1�`'t..1. Yt ; { 4y " �r its K1l t .,i��YCYt' r , y v tl �: •va f 7=y1 i , p�3. Ft-- � er y, ('�y}t. '} �},�r��;y .? .,1 �• �'i• r•� +�� � � ��'�� � x � ��'��.� C a,J`y��Yy,F�Y•I� �s /.t'{} ��.� . r}� t � �''( ,�, r �!♦7w�'C�!�lylf'l�c" "r���,,�i,� } ��`��,� `,}.�' `,"!Pt{3�i�•1 F ���z , � • �+1'i` ,►��'Y<� ���,#� t�� � 4�ti'+j+�,�'lt♦,� ,(,+ � ��, � i�,i 1/.� �fir"t{ �„ ; iki� q iii ll+�l±� '�f" �al`��}`},M};j� l;' ����µ;'�'`�13 � �� f Volr '•:x CAN, +�}• .•T ,� i. �Y 'I , �'�' ;� � .' '. i!r�� ��. r 1 ,- �' { ��; ��� ►� y1 �' '� > �� }rat� ��� r,P) � W • ' ' / �, � �.. •�r Q �,}. .f � } �} tl. +..�'4.1�•t} '� 4a ti 1' .'`k Z• i�1�,{ t�� Z '� �Y� � �� �'tj))< ': , ((S V� j •y '�' 1y s �} Via.+ .x {: �• i � �t yri� �p�, �' ' ��. � � , 1� �� 1���K�trxii� ���r � , �i ��- ��i �3 IrP 1 •i <�'.t r r�y�j,'��x '� I , ' �, 1p� ti, r ��7qd}''� �'� ... �. L� ' �"� ',4•'}_ 1 i�.' r tlt;.jp ')t��A • •�"t�. �/"ry,,. �� ' •� I, .:. ` �Y }?I �� :Y y1ll� ` �� 4y,�, 1 S,'•. y ; �1.. r. , #•.• � �W! . ,. � l.,� tr� 'a'7.'.S � a7a�r:h�M�"f�,',,`�F�}J� `1� ;'i�'.911'is�i�x'} ��.��� i�k_G� ,. IX4 to JC. Downtown Sid Use. -ll- ('1 12-26-76 t planned: . destination resort and a more intense use considerable promotion by the city and capturing a signifi- cant amount of local, regional and aut-of-state tourist market. 7. Specialty commercial fits well into low intensity development. f Specialty commercial includes such examples as Main Street ` In Seal Beach, a specialty shopping area in Long Beach, Bourbon Stre..t in hew Orleans, Lido Marina Village, and possibly part of downtown Santa Barbara. E 8, plulti-story ib not allowed here according to the map that accompanies the multi-story ordinance. The corner at Lake and Coast Hxway is included in the r circle for possible future consideration. + 9. UPI analysis indicates we should limit pier-side deyela meet so as not to detract from train btreet. Because of. their inherent ocean/beach visual advantages, restaurants and retail developments should be limited on the pier side. This lets the restaurants on the land side ] function as anchor tenants. Then the land side developments are more likely to fulfill their functions. Hentaurant potential: 40,000 sq, ft (5 to 7 restaurants)no more than 25,;6 (2 maximum) on the pier side. a 10, b number of comments under 1.1 (p. 3) apply here also. _ 5.2 _P_r_o_poossals pj tnned 1. Thevuse of the Old Civic Center site for senior .itlzens housing and related activities is supported and fncouraged, l 2. The planned retention and upgrading of the library on the f Old Civic Center site is supported, ' i � 3. Downtown commercial development by private enterprise shall be encouraged to the extent practical. . 4 4. Downtown commercial land use shall be low intensity. t 5• Downtown commercial shall have 35 foot or pausiUly a 2 story height limit. 6. C3 and 114 zoning shall be replaced with zoning that does not allow multi-story. 7• Development shall be limited on the pier aide of PCH Ao as p' not to detract from downtown viain Street. : 1 r `"�,' �'Y,4�,�0�"V'�,�,-r^v ^r{T ,+ � x '.[w. ma7.�vr ..+ir+^++rs�ww:+'fi+«..,t ,�F;.•hu"+gr�w tt�.�br• mx�.w y+� pi� '�erYri13���1��: ,.4�� _��AJ�`e.'C����S3&��•��",�.��1���'dta`;1���'+`u��'���i•#.{"''�,,`�s�� *�'���'..�Ds'��r'�" `���" n CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH IINTER•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION 11(/N11VG1UV tlA(11 To Mr. Jim Falin From George Tindall Director, Development Services City Engineer Subject Proposed LCP Policies Relative Date Decembr..r 23, 1980 to Community Facilities The City Council at their Dec. 15 1980 meeting on a straw � 9 vote concurred with the need to eliminate proposed policy . 16i dealing with the status of Pacific Coast Highway. It strongly suggested that a new policy, be substituted which would call for .the reclassification of Pacific Coast Highway from a primary to a major arterial highway. This would be consistent with the projected traffic needs of Pacific Coast • Highway projected by the City's Transportation Demand Model and would help support the projected additional traffic X. volume anticipated from the various land use categories being considered by the LCP for the downtown area. In addi- tion, the change of classification would be consistent with proposed expansion of the Huntington State Beach Park from Beach Blvd. to the river. The change of classification is r one of the first steps in a long process of implementing a project to upgrade and improve the Pacific Coast Highway for which the State has already, upon the request of the '.t cities of Huntington Beach and Newport Beach and the County, } allocated 10.3 million dollars. This matter was recently reviewed by the various operating • departments of City. Each department concurred on the need to improve Pacific Coast Highway. GLT:jy cc: P. Cook r '�' t .t t 'i��%w�,'��'5... '�. s^�,ps�;-a-..Rn;�.F.,,. ..,..- •w ! '�Z:s=:^,r'w+r'. fi';."� *,"e•"•,yt'•"•:lf "4•..+1^n.-.= exs:z a a�,r�r M t %r. 1 ' RE UES'� T ` CIL /ACTION Date April 26, 1985 I Y C EXX Submitted to: Honorab Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrat 4r Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Service�rjttp Subject: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION FOR THE CITY'S CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION Consistent with Council Policy? Yes ( 1 New Pollry or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On March 11 1985, the California Coastal Commission adopted a ;categorical exclusion for certain types of developments within the 'City'a coastal zone. Before the categorical exclusion can become .effective, the City Council must act to acknowledge receipt of the resolution of approval, including any conditions, and accept and '-,agree to the terms and conditions. The attached resolution takes this action, I I RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached resolution acknowledging receipt of the Coastal Commission's -resolution of approval and accepting and agreeing to the terms and conditions. ANALYSIS: The City's Local Coastal Permit was certified in geographic part on March 130 1985, and the Planning Division of Develop«ent Services has begun issuing coastal development permits. At present, all development within the City's coastal zone which is not exempt under the Coastal Act requires a coastal development permit. The City applied for, and on March 1, 1985, the Coastal Commission approved, a categorical exclusion. The categorical exclusion would relieve certain types of development within the coastal zone from the coastal development permit requirements. The categorical exclusion approved by the Coastal Commission imposed certain conditions limiting the types and location of development to be excluded. The City has already adopted ordinances incorporating tisese conditions into Division 9. The categorical exclusion will•, thereture, become effective as soon as the necessary resolution is adopted by the Council and determined in writing to be legally adequate by the Executive Director of the Coastal Commission. r J no�n� .� ' '• yr.�� - .Yx ��+ i.:..,;^`+.,. �'"'''t%k�3�'S,j'�� u,�f*'ta '.'d'y '�`. +te,�ye �'i.."�""?.,"T��w-�k.;Ment'S.IQ,,'+' 'p,�• f!`' j!, gF,r'�,,.fii, �sY '�"5, '�` <„If. y .:� 'y5�+« .,w.�.:'E,fy« l��.r � ^,k. v"' b •. �.« .� ,yy,ice` i K P A6n: '3ga Y.iiS..'.,'..."tt.. :fin,, Until the categorical exclusion becomes effective, the City.. riust process, coastal development permits for all non-exempt development. This. causes a hardship to. developers by delaying projects that otherwise could proceed through the approval. process without a coastal development permit. Prompt implementation of the categorical exclusion will nave staff time and developer time. PUNDING SOURCE: None needed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Do not adopt . the attached resolution. In this case, the categorical exclusion will not become effective. ATTACHMENT: Resolution JWP:JAF:kla I i I RCA 4-26-85 -2- (2338d) i fir.' ./.r-, . . .. . . ..._ _... ... ........ _ .. ,,zF �i� �����"Y� � i+`�".'..�".•.0'•f+t`dk��r�i��*�vEF�^*' .�. �^�..YK.H�.•".".3:PXr.s'r, �'.�3�3 ;!��11.^�.��r�.i'`r�3".f�`eR^��.,lac-_.: ,'xi �+�`i?'��2i�. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date July 25, 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City AdministrattgfM',�N� Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director of Ineve gffRb gY Subject: RESOLUTION LOCAL COASTAL PLAN 1 MIX G sty- Statement of Itsue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Itemativ ctions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: 3 On July 13, . 1984 the California Coastal Commission adopted findings tin the City' s Local Coastal Program certification with suggested modifications. After all the modifications have been made, the City may submit the. amendec] Lard Use Plan and zoning implementation, aceompanind by a'-resolution for review by Coastal Commissio:i staff. When reported to the Commission, the Local Coastal' Program would be certified. Since all. necessary modifications are being made, the Council may adopt the attached resolution to accompany the resubmittal package. RECOMMENDATION s Adopt the attached resolution submittinq the amended Local Coastal Program to the California Coastal Commission for final certification. ANALYSIS: According to.) the California Administrative Code, the resolution must j contain statements that the City Council: 3.. Acknowledges receipt of the Commission' s resolution of certification, including any terms or modifications which may have been suggested for final certification. 2. Accepts andagrees to any terms and modifian Lions (formal action to satisfy the terms and modifications is also required) . 3. Agree;, to issue coastal development permits for the total area included in the certified Local Coastal Program. FUNDING SOURCE; i None needed. Pio 4101 y� N LCP Resolution July 25, 1984 Page 2 ALTERNATIVE ACTIaIS: . Do.not'•adopt the resolution. In 'this case,: the executive director of the �IlifoinirA Coastal Commission cannot determine .that the City's action conforms to the. provisions .of the Coastal Commission's action to certify , . the, Local Coastal Program and the permitting authority could not be returned to the City. ATTACHMENT: Resolution CWTsJWPzJAF:df 0988d Ar. r• it I•' I . 4' f: 4ry. Y 114 THZ Superior Court �t C/ �/CQ �o l �- STATB OF CALIFORNIA v S In and for the County of Urange �� (.'� 00/� dl- G Z� CITY OF. HUHTINaTON BEACH 11RO0170 CITY COUNiCIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Stan of Califomta ! llountyofOranRe !xa' —�•.,,•c,F• APRIL L. ELLIOTTr It a That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of ltacow � �M ter the United.States,over the ate of twenty-one yean,and that 1 itp++�• .,���� a rr"" 1� • am ant a party tn.not Interested in the a6we entiti"I matter. Mso3�,tM M that 1 am the principal clerk of the printer of the + if HUNTINGTON BEACH INA. REV. a neon r of general circulation,published in the City of Mpe P � HUNTINGTON BEACH `at�a�t � Wet +lam-yth•:L'.•�:..„+,c� � County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the disemination of"news and Intetlictncr of s reneral ch.rac• ter,and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and at►II has a hone fide rub,,iption list of payint suh.critien, less tTfRw�wt am � and which newspaper has hc•en established,printed and puts- tet�T,{��, lashed at regular Intervals in the said County of Orange for a j 4tom.„� x^w`• period exceeding one year, that the notice, of which the l• �OI•• annexed is a printed co has been published In the rr tlar �> L c P copy, P r" ��,,.ye��AYdr�4 woo e+tll,�,.7� and entire Issue rf said newspaper,and ant in any supplement thereof,on the following dates,to wit; ;j►ln+e tl3t= ti'~�•-•r'' ;�. I JUNE lot 1982 i 5 I certify(or drelarr)under per.aity of penury that the f ttili- Irg Is true and correct. Dated at.....PARPEN..GROVE..................... California. this.ar(lt h{/d.y ofJ.JU� ..13.Q2... ��4 �T"••!•:, /.i{.h` .................. PiRna►ura J�1 r �r n . +� Q�Z�'�(/ ��Jl'�1��{/Z•�'1�GGG�yLcr aMrn car.et7eu CITY. OF HUNTINGTO" BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUnrM47CW i[ACH ` o Honorable Mayor and City Fr°m Planning Commission Council Subject". Data RECOMMENDATIONS ON REVISIONS July 26, 1982 TO THE COASTAL rLEMENT On July-,20, l902,, the. Planning Canunissian acted to,, recommend to the,_ City,;council 'hAvsmum .floor area ratios for 'the_ A wntown and . evisions' _ do'the;zC astal:element. , At, its meetings:`on July,:7 and, July: 20, 19321111 the•'-.Planning '.` Comnission..reviewed the.-"changes:'.do the 'Coastal .Element proposed `by staff: ;The 'Cominission`:voted to approve all' 'of 'ths=changes.' as proposed'.with- the, exception of i loor 'area;'ratios. for', the,downtown Y' ,area,at-.the. July 7th meeting. The text of thesc.,changes is'.atth' hed, ''Following the joint City Council/Pianniiig Commission 'study- session Juty�;19, staff.-proposed, a. reduced schedule` of, floor area-.-ratios _for,.,t1ie ` downtown. _ :'rheas' would' be -the max mum' in ensity..,liinits''for"the 'dawntowii [, however, �fioor, area .ratios"':lower than these .,00uld be adopted,in thd: `'Gowntawn S ecific :Plan. With this -understanding , ; the •Plannin `Commission ` '. P 9 y .r votad': to. approve the'proposed :floor area :ratios which are depiGted. fln the: attached 'map. JL a In addit o�':to-'the changes alreidy 'approved `by the.,Planning' Commission, y Staff reaommendb that wording be added- to .Figure 10.0 for.'.the(`high ; density 'residential areas between Lake Street and `Beach Blvd.',which would allow the three,.story height limit to,'be exceeded if the site : coverage is reduced and 'the setbacks are `increased. ' This;w uld `result in;mare landscaping and' open sP ace.with no .increase in .intensity.' Please note that the proposed extension of Walnut Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Blvd. is conceptual only and is therefore desigi.ated ' by .a dashed line. This version of Figure 10;9 also contains some revised -acreage estimations, which resulted from recalculating they arean of proposed land uses following the Planning Commission's action. , .. •t. The Planning Commissions recommendations and the additional-staff recommendations discussed above are contained in the attached text M. and maps. , JWP:JA-P s bas • Attachments J ;r .r V•� Cv r� i OF -10 -IT 70 EIDDEIF- �D—ED 30 ,, F,—lF�i0E °) LzIL: j tnt3C� '1 [E—�0RRF ? DRAFT PROPOSED CHANGES TO HUNTINGTON BEA^H OASTAL ELEMENT ACCESS Page 139 policy uo 4d(1) Require an offer'of dedication of an easement In all new development to al low • vertical access to the shoreline or to pudic recreation areas or to public trails and bikeways unless: Adequate access exists nearby or is proposed by the land use plan within 1000 feet; or » Access at the site would significantly degrade environmentally sensitive habitat areas, or » Findings are made, consistent with Section 30212 of the Coastal Act that access is inconsistent with public safety, military security needs, or that agriculture would be adversely affected, or r » The parcel is too narrow for on adequate privacy buffer separattrxi the occessway from the existing residence and would th6refore adversely affect the privacy"of the property owner. The.following guidelines shall be used in determining adequate privacy buffers: There should be at least 15 feet between the existing residence and the sick yard property line for an adequate buffer. These exceptions shall not apply to the Pacific Electric right-of-way. Offers of dedication for verf ical access in accordance with policy 4a shall be provided only to sandy beache! and recreation areas and In conjunction with development on vacant parcels, replacement of existirxj structures or in commercial projects. (2) Require on offer for dedication of an easement in all new development to allow lateral access along the shoreline public recreation areas or to public trails and bikewys unless: » Findings are made consistent with Section 30212 of the Coastal Act that access is inconsistent with public safety, military security needs, or that agriculture would be adversely affected, or; Access at the site v.ould significantly degrade environmentally sensitive habitat areas; or The parcel is too narrow for an adequate privacy buffer separating the lateral accessway trorn on existing residence. The fallowing guideline shall be used in determining adequate privacy buffers: There must be at least 15 feet between an existing residence, patio cover or pool and the shoreline in order to accommodate both en accessway and the privacy buffer. These exceptions shall not apply to the Pacific Electric right-of-way. An offer of dedication for lateral access in accordance with policy 4a shall be required only In conjunction with new development on vacant parcels aryl alomj all sandy beach areas. In existing developed residential areas which do not front a sandy beach area, access will generally only be required where It can be accomplished with the privacy standards established above. Access to the bulkhead areas of Huntington Harbour is generally not appropriate, beccrise In 4 most cases it cannot be provided consistent with privacy standards. However, there rrtay be situations where access to and along the bulkhead Is appropriate. Where a parcel is large'enough,to'provide public access consistent wl-h the privacy standards in new development, access along the bulkhead maybe appropriate; particularly If public use areas such'as fishing piers can be rea.hed or provided in'new development through such accessways. (3) In no case shall development In any way diminish or interfere wits► the public's right of access to the sea where acquired through use or legislative authorization. (4) The City shall accept offers of dedication for access consistent with its ability to assume maintenance and liability. If not accepted by'the City, offers of dedication for access may be accepted by cry,other public agencies or private association, provided that any association or agency which proposes to accept accessways must be able to assume maintenance and operation of such occessway prior to opening it to the public. WETLANDS Rernove wetland definition on divider tefore p,57; add p. 61 after Wetlands. The City bel!eves that the definition of "wetlands" in the:to'astal Act could be Improved to better identify environmentally important areas the Act intends to protect.-Nonetheless, fhe State I!gislaW did adopt the following deafinition of "wetlands" in the Coastal Act: ,!'L�isd within the coastal zone which may be covered periodically or permanently with shallow water and include snit water marshes, fre.4,water marshes, open or closed brackishwater marshes, swamps, mudflats and fens." Page 144, Policy 9a Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas 1S-,at does not significantly degrade habitat values and which is compatibie with the continuance of the habitat. Page 144, Policy 9b Require new development contiguous to wetland or environmentally sensitive habitat areas to Include buffers which will consist of a minimum of one hundred foot setback from the landward edge of the wetland where possible. If existing development or site configuration preciudes a 100 foot buffer, the buffer shall be established according to the factors listed in Policy 9c and ,shall be reviewed by the Department of Fish and Game. In case of substantial development or significantly increased human impacts, a wider buffer may be required in accordance with an analysis of the factors In Policy 9c. Page 144, Policy 9c Develop specifications for buffers taking into consideration the following factors: i, p sp g 1 �g E ctars Biological Significance of Adjacent Lands. The buf ter should be sufficiently wide to protect the functional relationship between wetland and adjacent uplarA. �n4 Sensitivity of Species to Disturbance. The: buffer should be sufficiently wide tor.,. ensure the mast sensitive will`not be disturbed significantly by permitted development, based on habitat requirements of bath resident and migratory species an the short- and long-term adaptability of various species to human disturbance. Susceptabiiity of Parcel to Erosion. The'buffer should be sufficiently wide to allow for interceptlon of any additional material eroded as a result of the proposed development based on soil and vegetative characteristics., slope and runoff characteristics, and impervious surface coverage. Use of Existing Features to Locate Buffer Zones, Where feasible, development should be located on the side of roads, dikes, irrigation canals, flood control chann-0s, etc., away from the environmentally sensitive habitat area. Add Page 144, Policy 9e Prohibit fill'in any wetland areas for the purpose of road construction, except for roads required to serve uses allowed in WLMands pursuant t, and consistent with Section 30260-30264 for coastal dependent ohd,energy uses. Also, if a project were approved pursuant to and consistent with SActian 30233(a) (3), and a road was part of +: the approved project, such road would be f ermitled in'portions of the severely., degraded wetland where development is permitted. Any roads governed by this policy shall be limited to necessary access roads appurtenant to the facility, and shall be permitted only where there is no feasible less environmentally damaging alternative and where feasibility mitigation measures have been provided. NEW DEVELOPMEAT Add to Page I f0, after first paragraph The general height limit for all categnrfes of development Is three stories. In specified areas, aonuses for parcels of one half block or more may be granted provided that the followinq conditions are met: 1) The-bulk and siting of structures shall be controlled to protect public access and scenic and visual resources. A number of approaches may be used to achieve this, such as a step approach to building heights, staggered building envelopes, limits on the site coverage and building orientation, and use of view corridors. 2) Adequate parking shall be provided. Areas where increased Intensities may be granted are depicted in Figure 10.8 on page f 128. (sage I I i Add to Visitor-servincl paragraph Office and residential uses shall be conditional• h r only and shall only be permitted if visitor serving uses are either provided prior to other development or assured as part of the development. No office of residential use! -hall be permitted in any visitor-serving designaticm seaward of Poci fic Coast Highway. "t: ` In visitor-serving comercioldeveiopment the street level or one-third of the total -floor area shall be devoted to visitor-serving commercial uses; however at least 50 percent of the street level shall be visitor-serving commercial. In:the event of a consolidation of a minimum one block area, conditionbl uses may be located in separate structures or on separate portions of the parcel in the context of a planned development, provided no less than one third of the total floor area. permitted is.dwoted to visitor-serving uses, and provided that substantial public open space and pedestrian access amenities are provided to maintain a predominantly visitor-serving orientation, Page 98. Figure 9.4 Delete extension of Palm Avenue west of 38th Street (Edwards). Add to Page 131, paragraph 5. (discussion of City property at Beach and PCH) The north portion of this area has been designated Residential/Conservation and fhe'south portion of this area has been designated Commercial/Support Recreation. Development shall be permitted only pursuant town overall development plan and subject to the following conditions: i A small wetland area has been preliminarily mapped by the Department of Fish and Game j on this property. Prior to permitting any cevelopment of this parcel, the City will require the submission of topographic, vegetation, and soils information ldentlfying the extent of • atiy wetlands (if such exist). The information shall be prepared by qualified professional, and shalt be subject to review by the California Department of Fish and Game. If the I wetland is determined by the Department of Fish and Game to be severely degraded I pursuant'to Sections 30233 and 30411 of the Coastal Act or if It is less than one acre In size, other restoration options may be undertaken, pursuant to the Coastal Commission's "Statewide Interpretive Guidelines for Wetlands and other Wet Environmentnliy Sensitive Habitat Areas." Conservation easements, dedications or other similar trechontsms shall ` be required over ail wetland areas as a condition of development, to assure rermanent protection. Public vehicular traffic shall be prohibited in wetland areas governed by the conservation easement. Specific drainage and ero1on control requirements shall be Incorporated Into the project design to ensure that wetland areas are not adversely affected. No further subdivision of any parcel shall be permitted which would have the effect of'dividing off environmentally sensitive habitat from other potions of such parcels for which urban uses are permitted in the L.UP until such time as the permoneni protection of the wetland, if any, is assured. �I as COASTAL LAND USE PLAN GOLDENWEST STREET TO BEACH BOULEVARD GCNERAL COMMERCI (6 stories) ** . �, ,,� (S+ acres) •j f^� r%' "a: MEDIUM �► s _' __...•, .._ _..._. �y...l?•��� .,.__�..�,. �__...� �j,, • �t; L•,.i'x DENSITY 7-1 �' _~ •� j t i i i i j # 1•r r. ''i'��'- -" / ;.'P RESIDENTIAL w ! L v- c , t_ c_ ;; ;: (; ; i� .c' �; �� (3 stories) 'ti.. r ( OFFICE/J� \�' <- '`� �: •'1 (161 + acre.--) i� {iw`i__. Fc£SIDENTIAL - ; � (6 stories) ; --;�--fir \, {y3 +. acres) L. ��#�:_ 00 (1) ,..4 .t' r •{sf 1� 'ram'- f t ! VI FTCR- HI OH VISITOR- VISITOR- HIGH C011MEt'iCIAL SERVING DENSITY SERVING SERVING DENSITY, SUPPORT;::_ CO 2%1ERCIAL RESIDENTIA"* COMMERCizi. COt-24ERCIAL RESIDENTIAV RECREATION (3 + acres) (3 stories) ** (4 + acres) (6 stories)" CONSERVATION' (45 + acres) _ (33 + acres) (3 stories) (30+ acres} *HIGH DENSITYOPTION ONLY AVAILABLE ON CONSOLIDATED•PARCELS (47 + acres) a **SEE PAGE 43 FOR CLARIFICATION OF HEIGHT LIMITS (1) Conceptual alignment--precise alignment will .be- curVilinear:', HUNTINGTON B 4 H C41.FORN& Figure 10.8 _. FL4NNING DIVISION COASTAL LAND USE PLAN ►r`� GOLDENWEST: STREET TO BEACH BOUL-VARD (GROSS ACRES) 4.4 COMMERCIA . } _ ► • . i• (6 stories) *,* •,'+f ,i �. 1... �+ acres} I. - ��� ��,�; .].,� ;_,, MEDIU i tea++' r r ..y� ' • t '�;.�,� .. �; �� . _..� �: _ .-�. .:+:,.� �•, 1\ ♦� .,•- J�� -. DENSITY e •7 :•� ` f 1 ! ! j+ /i. f/�,`..w.' `%r,\1 `:� RESIDENTIAL .. ' f�' :_.._: _ �=`_:�__ `.:!_J�.._. _—; ;-. '� _.�..._ _. � ���•� ;•.`• (3 statics) OFFICE; �1 �. ^. „ + acres) L s� (43 + acres} j .- rNUNN : t„ IX sL VISITOR- HIGH VISITOR- VISITOR_ ! HIGH CO!-U-4 RCIAL r ` .,«. SERVING L .P3SZ'i`: SERVING SERVING DENSITY SUPPORT , f ^3•" 1 CMITSERCIAL R£SZDr.N-:IAL* CMIERCIAL COMMERCIAL, RESIDENT!- R£.CRI' ION (3 + aces) (3 stories) " (S ± acres) (b stories) " CONSERVATION {29•� acres) _ (43 + acres) (38. + acres) ) stories)*** — .� ` •' s 'HIGH DENSITY OPTION ONLY 1VAILFiBLE ON CQF150LZDATED'PARC£LS (57 + acres) fr` �, • f **SEE PAGE 43 FOR CLARIFICATION' OF HEIGHT.:LIMITS ***MAY BE EXCEEDED WITH REDUCED r (1) Conreptua2-_ali.gnment--precise. alignment will. be curvilinear. LOT COVERArE f:T}F TEM Sr-TPACISS HUNT[NGt`ON BEACH: CALGCaRNIP. Fic; ire 10:8 ._ PLANNING DIVISION 0. �� CITY OIL �a:INTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION T° Charles, W.: Thompson ��� James W. Palin, Director . ;t City Administrator Q Development services Subject C e ;. PlahM ng Commis3aion report and July► 21, 1982 r recommendation to the City Council 'on Coastal Element Revisions S r tThd attached communication from the Planning Commission constitutes theirl-report:and -'recoinmendation to the "City Council 'on 'the Coascal Element� revisions`: 'Please £onward. it `to the�Council•. for the:ir.��-' i-nformat.16 .••ConsiderEti.on of .these revisions was continued .to. :the August '2 'ineeting 'of the City Council. `JWPijAr,:bas t i i • + I t CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEASMar" 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 P.0:Box 190 ' Hay 6, 1982 Honorable Mayor and Members -of the City Council- :City of• Huntington Beach . Huntington Beach, -CalICoinla 926ti8 ' ' Dear Mayor and City Counci l .Hembe'rs: The Economic Advisory Board respectfully requests your consideration of our reconvenda- tlon for'actlon to facilitate approval of the local Coastal flan. Statement. of Issue: ' Approval of the local •Coastal Plan has barn`stalled.. 'The major obstacla, to approvai :appears to be the area aiong Pacific Coast liighway, south of, Beach Blvd. , which has been designated as We d Wetlands. The Boar s recommendations are Intended to rtfmve this obstacle in order that a majority of the plar, can bo approved•ind IrMlemanted. ' Recommendation: I . That portion of the local Coestal, Plan conslstIng of,.,the Area along': Paelfic Coast Highway and south nf Beach Blvd, which has-been designated Wetlands, be removed from the local Coastal Plan and handled separately. 2. The.Ctty Cot+ncll'encourage the eval6tion of enhancement of the area along Pacific Coast Highway, south of Beach Blvd. This evaluaElon would include finan;lal as, well as ecological considerations and also include evaluatlon of existing development In the area. • • i' Anal sls: : The Board beileves that a major component of"future` ecvnomic growth in the City o& Huntingtoo Beach Is rapid approval and Implementation of the local Coastal Plan. Respectfully subalitted, Tom A Grady,.Choi rman' Economic Advisory Board Tnlcg ! q�•7t.•M�3r.Y.«du::1fl:`t W1t+.:nv r».w.Wnr..r+wr.,....v'.•row.�•�y'r••. �'I �Y.:a.. .':+,,.'. .,.°...... .^f'...�1. . r:.i'.»x 1..t.1.1^..it:.,rl'..F:Ja7.4t.gw f',r Ll. +.www......� _ .. ..,.,•+.r.++w.+.r,w,r+; .. - •lid. , 1 t�. REQUE i FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date Jutae 10 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles t-I. Thompson, City Administrato r Prepared by: James tJ. Palin, Director of Development Servi ces Subject: REVISIONS TO COASTAL ELEMENT Statement of Inue,Recommendation,Analysis,funding Source,Alternative AcGuns,Attachment:: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Oti .November 5, 19111 the Council directed City staff to work with the Coastal Commission staff to develop some revisions to the Coastal Element which are necessary to receive approval by the Commission and which retain the intent of the City Counci{1. The Council `directed staff to focus attention on all Areas of the Coastal Zone besides the wetlands and ,related areas south of Beach Blvd/ and near the Bolsa Chicnt recognizing that wetlands involve especially difficult issues. Includ- ed with these changes, are some adjustments to the land use map which will make it consistent with the draft Downtown Specific Plan. All. the attached changes (except for the few changes to the land use , map): have already been reviewed by the Coastal Commission staff and they have found them acceptable. The Commission staff is review- ing the changes, to the land, use map at this time; we do not foresee major difficulties with these changes and expect: that the Commission staff will let us know if there are any problems before the Council meeting. In light of this, it: appears that if these revisions ate accepted by the Council, the Coastal Element (except for the wetlands and related areas) has an excellent chance of being approved upon resubmittal without any further conditions or modifications by the State. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review the attached revisions to the Coastal Element and duct the staff to resubmit the element back to the Planning Commission for their report and recommendation. ANALYSIS: The certification of the Coastal Element by the 'Coastal Commission it an important step toward regaining.:City permit. authority in the Coastal. zone and toward implementation of revitalization plans for the Downtown. Last autumn, the Coastal Commission approved the City's Coas.tal. Land Use Plan (LUP) with conditions. , Those conditions are not binding'on the City, but if ,those conditions were adopted or -if similar changes were made to the LUP, the plan would be appeoved'by the Commission. Ori November 5, 1981, the Council reviewed these conditions and directed CJ.ty. staff to work. with the Coastal Commission staff to develop wording for the revisions which would be acceptable to the Coastal Commiasion P10 4/81 ,•,'.•�...��i�1.r:'�N4. .,. . r+ .. .... »,. +.......,,�i..t:. . a.a .. .r,.......i ..:Y..,'.wx..4.:.:. :. ..:a^m.Gi i pia....+:".SSJa i=.~.w.L:T'H.�:a .t 4�..4�y""tS".► 1.., f 1 , Coastal Element Revisions June 21, 1982 Page 2 and which`"would retain the intent of the Councils .adopt ed policies. The "aftached revisions to the policies are. relatively minor changes which do not adversely affect the city.'s, plan for the, Coastal Zane. If adopted .by. the Council, we believe the revised Element has a very good chance of being ,certified by the Coastal Commission for".the entire Coastal Zone, except for the wetlands and related areas south of Beach Boulevard and near the Holsya Chica. After the Land Use. . 'Plan is approved by the Commission, the City will receive a $50,000 grant to write the implementing ordinances and will also become eli- gible for grant. funds for nier restoration, accessways and parks. In. addition to the wording changes to bring the plan into conformance with" the coastal Commission conditions, a few minor changes. in the land use map are proposed which would rrake the plan consistent with the draft Downtown Specific Plan. These variations in land use con- figuration'better. integrate the Specific Plan area'with the surround- ing uses and-increase the economic feasibility of projects built _. under the plan. The proposed changes are: 1. Tl�t, visitor-serving commercial node which presently runs from Tenth to Thirteenth Streets, will be shifted so that it runs from Eleventh to Fourteenth Streets, thus centering it between planned traffic signals. This visitor-serving commercial node as well as the node between Goldenwest and Twenty-first Street would, be reduced to the half-block between PCH and the alley.. .If a.,block were to be c6nsolidated, visitor-serving uses would be permitted anywhere; however, if consolidation does not .'occur, it was felt that the half 'block between the alley and Walnut would be .more- compatible with inland development if it were used for residential purposes. 20 The reduction of visitor-serving commercial area. above is" offset by an increase in visitor-serving commercial square footage alongg PCH between'. Lake and iiuntington Streets. The draft Specific Plan proposes a new road which would extend Walnut Ave. to Beach Blvd. roughly parallel .to PCH. The construPtion .of such a road would be a natural buffer to separate residential uses north of i:he road from visitor-serving commercial uses south of the. road to PCH. "`%Ssitor-serving commercial 'in this area would also provide. a cantinuation of, the downtown .commercial core as a link to the proposed commercial-•recreation area at PCH. and Beach Blvd. Therefore, the present visitor-serving commercial node along the east side of, Lake Street at PCH has been reshaped to" fill-,the. area between "Lake and Huntington Streets and between ,PCti and the proposed wainut Ave. extension. The adjacent" high density residential use will then extend all the way to Lake St. north of Walnut Ave. extension. rLRctM+ttylYe1.•�tN sue;l.n..;+.•1-.:.•..:ft� ::3�r�17'1t YVL4{e::!lC)s .M NR•.frAyMY+Y71ICJA'x f 1..1:L:::7.-5.surt,.au.a r i.;xyL;,a.r;i:1'1>s..l.s w:i:+Y.N:.s,;..rr1s�,5'ss'Y[+,T s w:,Tia,,ft+yt:+i.!:•^+( i',d " 4r _ Coastal Element Revisions June 21, 1982 Page 3 3. The ,City-owned property. at Beach Blvd. and PCH will be bisected by the proposed:Walnut,Ave. extension. The north half of this property has been proposed for high density residential use in the, draft. Specific Plan. This is consistent with the present mobile home overlay in the Coastal Element. Staff feels V-.a t there would still be sufficient area with commercial recreation ` zoning on the south half of the property to attract a good commercial project. 4. The.oid ,Civic Center Site is,.redesignated from "high density residential" to the more• flexible "office/residential" in light of the recent relocation of the Senior citizens housing project. Also a small area of general"•commercial which was to serve the proposed Senior project and act as 'a ")auffer" between the project and the downtown "core" has likewise been redesignated "office/residential" because the Senior project has 'been moved. ' . Staff has not yet developed alternate -language for the. watland areas south: of Beach Blvd. and near`- the Bolsa .Chicri (see attached map) . , Unless the Council adopts the conditions suggested by the_ Coastal Commission last fall for these areas, the Coastal''-, Commission will probably. not approve the portions of the LUP which,,apply to...-. these geographic;=areas. Thus, all the. Coastal Zone, • exept for. these . portions, would be approved. This technique is called an ' approval in part".'or ",white-holing. " City staff 'will resume kork-.on revisions to the plan for there areas shortly, in' the hope that a resolution acceptable to both the City and the State can be reached for these areas, too: However, by ;"white--holing",them at this time, approval for the remainder of . the Coastal Zone' can be achieved now. This would -be ;n accord with the Council's -action on' November 5, 1981 and the recommendation by the Economic- { Advisory' Board on May 6, 1982. After apprcval of this portion of the plan, staff will begin further study .and evaluation of the area 'south of Beach Blvd. , including financial and .ecologi- cal .considerations as suggested by the Economic Advisory Hoard fl in their letter' to the Council (see attachment . ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Do not accept. the�se revisions and direct staff to continue to work on'•alternative .language. The certification of the' LUP would ' be delayed further, which could in turn delay revitalizati'on ,_. efforts in the downtown. and eventual return of permit authority to the City. In addition, no funding would be -available .for a ordinance preparation, pier restoration, accei3sways or parks. 2. Accept these revisions and the Coastal Commission's r6comm6hda- Lions for the other.wetland areas. This would result in certifi- cation for the entire coastal zone, including the wetland and re- sl lated areas south of Beach Blvd. and near the B61sa Chica. ;. �- .',y:rS:.l^" ".�.•.:.iA.N.tnw+.�.Y1�nn.1Ll'-;.i'v.^.4`�.1' ,.,u.i'.i.;.J:�'i.'•4t2.Y�ni.=. ina.'.+.'i,.. ^i.CLi.:.i..,••y'Nrar.�.»1.r'.k1'�=:u. ...r.•,.-•.w•.�.....+..wwa+.r.rr!wr-vA.�i. '� ; IX i ' Coastal Element Revisions ; June 21, 1982 Page 4 FUNDING:-SOURCE: None required. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: ].. Proposed changes to Coastal Element. 2. Maps of Coastal Zone ' 3.. Letter from Economic Advisory Board JWp:MM:bas 71 '1. t r: :}';.� � . . .. .. .M1•(', •if r' �''�kLtiisat .rva«e:;;:r, i':tie{:2S�i,'%Sl:::.':"+:1!.�,%.7'r3:tiii3.�x:•i=:7."<+his:t,.:rec,olrwanr.►snc+ruxrrn.•.va........,.R..re4r,taxlit+ii�'�t'�*�+r. } •"� (t t' i �f ttfey` - l - •s, "`is r rrr 1 1 r• rwM ar{tlr ,i• `4\ 'ram fy l . doastG1 zone "r f. boundary +• frr f ' �M1111iYa♦I�I Irl�iYl�gq��dr111�I1A� rr��l�l♦1 �—— — _ AREAS LIKELY TO'BE "WHITE-HOLED" BY THE COASTAL COMMISSION hunfib�grton beach planning dwjsion '�A'tt6it.7ti3►.o.'w"�.+�sK'f'r•3ti'f'titt'R:u✓.wf+.v rae.eHx+'.:x:3�."r'is�:,`,^:.s.tiFi:.:.~:�:�:ai.=:.:,;-:.3.:z��=Jrr.q:.'4.,.i•+wr�ca«.�n....ua+.'.�+t�u�r.+w.n.r.....+.+...�«....-+,+..•.,+rw�+a�r�w'�n t i - COASTAL-LAND USE PLAN - - GOLDENWE•ST.STREET TU 8EACFl BOULEVARD ! _ � (6 Stories)" AIM � 71 `�•! v �:�f- ��r` ''�r ! ►�r��i�.J��1L�...:•L�r� N� '' ,,f� ��.- V•.� MEDItW. { � DLI r- : �! I RESIDENTZALJ L i H i�� HIGH , �.�' f �y� 1 (3 Stories).'" ` r Li Li DESI } � r� '� (16I acres) R£SIDEh " 5 ' HIGH --- - - - - - DENSITY i�� •••• __ - _ " RESIDENTIAL ••.. 'i (3 Stories) (28 acres) VISITOR= NIGH VISITOR AIGH VISITOR OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL CO2�BLRCIRI, SERVING DENSITY SERVING DEIr'SITY SERVING `. (6 Stories)** SUPPORT y' MMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL* CO!�AL RESIDENTM* "_ CQMMERCIFt, (35,acres) RECREATION' (6 acres) (3 Stories)"'* ' (9 acres) (3 Stories)**, (6 Stories)** (S7 &cres) " (24 acres) (13 4 -es} (25 acres) *HI(:H.Dx..I[SI°:'Y OPTION-ONLY. AVAILABLE ON CONSOL2DA3ED PARCELS. **SEE PAGE 43'FOR CI+ARIFICATION OF HEIGHT'"7�IMITS.." =.h _ Original Figure"10.8 — — 1} COASTAL NOW LAND (1SE=.PLt�('L - GOLDENWEST. STREI.T-`TO''BEACH BOULEVARD II�� 1:t�•�l GENE � COMMERcr _ ` 401 (6 stories) ** acres) ��'y ,:��i'f MEDIUM DENSITY`- RESIDENTIAL '•� •� 1 s) . .. _J t 1 L_S !.i 0 L�i_._?11_j __TE F1[1 !7 E 11 Ill E E-i OFFICE/. (161 acre : �'� t 4 '°' 3.. .. RESIDENT Saciesj 3 ** { r 7 43 ;p mmm r r �4 LF :s '`. VISITOR-, HI H , VISITOR- VISITOR=•. HIGH:. - COMMERCIAI; SERVING,:-- DENSITY. SERVING', SERVING DENSITY,. SUPPORT, COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL*, COMMERCIAL ` COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL RECREATION'_ ._ (3 acres). (3 stories) ** (4 acres) (6 stories) ** (3 storied` (30 acres) {45 acres} (33 acres)` (47 acres) �- *HIGH DENSITY OPTION .ONLY;AVAILABY,E-ON,;:CONSOLIDATED'PARCELS ... **SEE PAGE'43 FOR CLARIFICATION;OF' HEIGHT'LIMITS i • y . K, NUNTiNGTOy CBE CH 'CALIFORN(A" Fi uie` 10.S •' Revised 9 PtANNING�.�DIVISIOt`s: :. _ t DRAFT PROPOSED CHANGES TO HU!,JTiNGTON 13EACH COASTAL ELEMENT ' ACCESS Page 139 policy 4a 4a(1) Require an offer.of dedication of an casement in all new development to allow, r vertical access to the shoreline or to public recreation areas or to public trails and bilceways unless: - Adequate access exists nearby or Is proposed by the land use plan within'1000 feet; or Access at the site would significantly degrade environmentally sensitive habitat areas, or Findings are made, consistent"with Section 30212 of the3 Coastal Act that access is inconsistent with'public safety, military security needs, or that agriculture wauid be adversely affected, or ,The parcel,Is too narrow for'an adequate privoc?,buffer"separahrx� the ,. accessway from the existing residence and would therefore adversely affect the : privary.of she property owner. The.foilowing'guidelines shall be,used in .: determining adequate privacy buffers: There should be at least 15 feet"lietwecn the existing residence and the side yard property line for an adequate buffer. These exceptions shall not apply to fhe Pacific Electric right-of-way. ;.� . Offers of dedication for vertical occess�In accordance with policy Ga shall be provided only to sandy beaches and re'creof ion areas'and in conjunc tion with development on vacant parcels;'replocement of existing structures or in commercial projects. (2) Require an offer for dedication of an`easement in all new develo-ment`to allow . # lateral access along the shoreline public recreation areas or to public trolls and bikewys unless: t Findings are made consistent with Section 30212 of the Coastal Act that occess Is Inconsistent with public safety, military security needs, or that agriculture would be adversely affected, or; r, Access at the site would significantly degrade environmentally sensitive ha lIat areas; or The parcel is too narrow for an adequate privacy buffer.separating,fhe;(aterdl occessway.from'an existing residence. The following guideline'sholl be used in determining adequate privacy buffers: There'inust be at.least 15 feet between an'existing residence,patio cover or pool and the shoreline.in order to accommodate both on accessway and the privacy buffer. These exceptions shall not apply to the Pacific Electric right-of-way. An offer of dedication for lateral access in o.corda►i�a with policy;46'shall be . required only.In conjunction with new developmeint,on vacant parcels and along 'i all sndy"bea b areas. in existing developed residenticl areas which do not, fronta sandy each area, access will generally only be requ;red where1t can be accomplished with the,privacy'standards established above. Access to the bulkhead areas of Huntington Harbour is generally not opprop�late, because in f„rz��,,,,,'A�yyjr:bw(W;.►iEa.°ir.'ty�d+l-.*�Wk�A1�':�•,;y"r4':r: ..f.i • ..,0.. ..- . . •. .. fC�:w'AZrf.Futi{ir+yR►�+Pi++rw.".""`^- "'y�r* �+�� s. Y. .:1i.fa.}'.s. e.�i. ..,l.r:A�; rraeti.r:,r�1i7 i'i..t:.;n�:•`��:.r13...7 most roses it cnnn' be provided consistent with privacy standards. However, there may be situations where,access Jo and along the bulkhead is appropriate. Where a parcel is large enough'to provide public access consistent with the privacy standards in new development, access alcng the bulkhead may be appropriate, particularly if public use areas such as fishing piers can be reached or provided in new development through such accessways. (3) In no case shall developmenf in any way diminish or interfere with the public's right of access to the sea where acquired through use or legislative authorization. (4) The City shall accept offers of dedication for access consistent with its ability to assume maintenance and liability. If not accepted by the City, offers of '-dedication for access may be accepted by any other public agencies or private association; provided that any association or agency which proposes to accept accessways must be able to assume maintenance and operation of such accessway prior io opening it to the public. WETLANDS Remove wetland definition on divider before p. 57; add p. r 1 after Wetlands. The City believes that•the definition of "wetlands" In the Coastal Act cmild he improved to better identify environmenfally.important areas the Act lntends to protect. Nonetheless, the State legislature did adapt the following definition of "wetlands" in the Coastal Act: "Land within fhe coastal zone which may he covered periodically or permanently with shollftl water and include salt Water marshes, freshwater marshes, open or closed brackishwater marshes, swamps;mudflots and fens." .: Page 144, Policy 9a .t Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas that does not significantly degrade habitat values and which is i ' compatible with the continuance of the habitat. I Pack 144, Policy 9b 4,13equircnew development contiguous to wetland or environ nsi mentally setive hahitnt i areas to.include buffers which will consist of a minimum of one hundred foot se`thack from the landward edge of the wetland where possible. If existing de�veloment or site confl(liMtian precludes a 100 foot buffer, the buffer shall be established according to the factors listed in Policy 9c and shall be reviewed by the Department of Fish and Game, in"case of substantial development or significantly increased lx►man Impacts, a wirier . buffer may he required in accordance with an analysis of the factors in Policy 9c. Page Mt Policy 9c Deveiop specifications for buffers taking inlo consideration the, following factors: Biological Significance of Adjacent Lands. The buffer should be sufficiently wide to protect the functional relationship between wetland and adjacent upland. '/lr .�7, s.}F Y. .a1y". •T..: ,:j.'n lv. . .r� ;:1.M . F ! .�. ...+..� ... . . `-.. y.. . ". .. ....�enl�. w•,. -av -....... T 1 `S" Z.. i •,a—"-r.,•'�.�j:i'.::rl+a4a.' +.ila�+rir' +'�r7�. p{�.i'a.�.•;y rt :et TtY: +.Ri' .s c: .t�. '.r�` ;n., ,. :\••• ,:r1+ r..�:� •crr,.�-r�. •�q.a•s;t,. ..� ♦ri i , t .x. Sensitivity of Species 90 Disturbance, The buffer should be sufficiently wide to; ensure thot.the most sensitive species will not be disturbed significantly by permitted development, based on habitat requirements of both resident and migratory species i.; an the short-and long-term adoptability of various species to human disturbance. f SusceptobiiBy of Parcel Ito Erosion. The buffer should be sufficiently wide to allow for interception of any additional material eroded as a result of the proposed dv✓elopment based on soil and veyetotive characteristics, slope and runoff characteristics, and impervious surface coverage. Use of Existing Cultural Features to Locate Buffer Zones: Where feasible, development should be located an the side of roads, dikes, Irrigation canals, flood control channels, etc., away from the environmentally sensitive habitat area. Add Page 144, Policy 9e Prohibit{fill in any wetland areas for the purpose-of road construction, except:for roads required to serve uses allowed in wetlands pursuant to and consistent with Section 30260-30264 for coastal dependent and energy.eses. Also, if a project were approved pursuont,to and consistent'with Section 30233(a).(3), and a rood was part of the_approved project, such road would be-permitted in portions of the severely djraded wetland where�development is permitted. Any roads governed by.this policy shall be limited to necessary access roads appurtenant_to the facility, and shall be permitted only where.there.is no.feasible less environmentally damaging alternativeri and :.here feasibility mitigation measures have been provided. NEW DEVELOPMENT ,t Add to Page 110' after first paragraph The genera) height.limit for all categories of development Is `hree stories. In specified areas, bonuses for lot consolidation of one half bla,~k ar mare mayb� ,. • gmnted pi Ided thafthe following conditions are met: t:. 1) The bulk and siting of structures shall be controlled to protect public access and "scenic and visual resources. A'number of approaches may be used to ochiev_ this, such``as a step approach to building heights, staggered building envelopes, { ; limits on`the site coverage and building orientation, and use of view corridors. ; 3) Adequate parking shall be provided. Areas where increased intensities may be granted are depicted in Figure 10.8 an page f.`. r' 128. j`fit Page III Add to Vistior-serving paragraph r' Office and'residen'tial uses shall be conditional only and shall only,be permitted if visitor serving uses are either provided prior.to other'development or assured as part of the development. No office of residential uses shall be permitted in any visitor-serving designation seaward of Pacific Coast Highway. f 75 �� i.�wr; �.h:.T.;�.....`.:t4a',� .Y: .:a.' ��•, i•. x'S�ii"t",7.a»; _r^ ti: �•3:+t-;�...t;e,�t�r',. '...�.tr.. ir: ,::ia_r;'.t.. ;.>,:rFx..:_li:::f�i'�^.'iw',.r1 ii rr �v� .Y✓��ta�•�I�'.+�.:.1': In visito -r ser�eng commercial development the street level or one-third of the total floor area shall be devoted to visitor-serving commercial uses; however at least ';0 percent of the street level shall be visitor-serving commercial. In the event of a consolidation of a minimum one blo--k area, conditional uses may he located in separate)structures or on separate porticos of the parcel in the context of a planned development, provided no less than one third of the total floor crew permitted is devoted to visitor-serving uses, and provided that substantial public open space and pedestrian access amenities are provided to maintain a predominantly ' visitor-serving orientation. Page 98, Figure 9.4 Delete extension of Palm Avenue west of:38th Street (Edwards). ? i'. Add the following floor area ratios to Figure 10.8 Page 128: .1.0 for Goldenwest to Sixth (" Streets; 6.0 for Sixth to Lake and Huntington to Beach. Add to Page 131, parogroph S: (discussion of City property at beach and PCHi , t This ared has been designated Commercial/support recreation/Conservation. Development shall he permitted cn(v pursuant ro an overall development plan onrd subject to fhe following condition,: A srhall wetland area has been pmlinitnarily mapF:!d by the Departmmit of Fish and Game on this preaperfy. Prior tci pe rmitting-any development of this parcel, the. City will require the submission 6f topogr`oOhIc, vegetation,'and soils information identifying the extent of any,existing wetlands.. Tlu±'information shall be prepared by qualified professional, and shall be subject to review by the California Department of Fish and Come. If the wetland is determined by the Deypartri ent of Fish &A Game to be severely degraded pursuant to ; Sections 30233 and 30411 of the Coastal Act or if it is less than one acre in size, other restoration options`may be undertaken, pursuant to the Coastal Commission's "Statewide Interpre�five Guidelines for Wetlands and other Wet Environmentally Sensitive Hohitnt Areas:' Conservation easements, dedications or other similar mechanisms shall be t` required.over all wetland areas as a condition a..development, to assure permanent protection. Public vehicular traffic shall he prohibited in wetland areas governed by the conservation erasement. Spegific drainage and erosion control requirements shall he incorporated into the project design to ensure that wetland areas are not adver•fly affected, No further subdivision of any parcel shall be permitted which woulr..nive the effect of dividiriq aft•environmintally.sensitive habitat from other portions of such parcels for which urbar,uses are permitted in the LUP. jV t; t, rl:irlY��.'if•!s'.��f..•t-+`N. :i i�+.: }, ...� .. y. _ t �.. _- -...,. -. ,. " «.s..:,,_. .. ..41...! ., ,.n.r�S F%+ i^+=%1Y+y�.i�-r+wsirMrw�' , `,? sF�'-.\ r: ,'i' ^iL+ ,& t'� •r .-7..."•r✓,,. 'r:. .{n. i i"'a.,. .1+ wt'.::::1 *'•e r 1 :t S , 1 {r, t ! NO , •�����'�i}�,��� � ��-� . �z� �°�� ,,�. ��;� ��i,'�,�' >, e �y j t� ��,� � �"�°t,A�l'.� . Y'• �� 4fi�z� g ��� t,� t�1�apt,�X[� Y. i` 1, i•. w ' of N, tt t n: S��t� ){" ! .L�`. :v1 p t> :3 b" i-yt. `/ s .1 rn,,e ) Y`sv ' -i J �s 1 Pik -d + M. �. �T '2 y• 1',,.{�'J y 4 a .y Y' 1'A S' 3+ t`Y;r♦ "s � •x`- 't Y 1f- � 4\� �_•}`• .r� .y.. .;. "Yt�1u}� ,,� "S��,L1,�,,,.��,: A. '�`k��tA{,f`,c�� ��' t'i. �!A��� �31FY �} f3t �'� s .�1`/.�5�'�� y 't Ri��Z�'e k�4�`�` ,�i+�,s} � 4,��4'��.�' Y' S°�'�cff�iA.��s�f t •a:t � r '�{�f�.'�t�i ' ;rt ,,v i,k�,t Y•�pf, �ttY!}`f. r,``.�P+tjx ` FVjc". � iqj4r��1�, .r�f {'i{?t �c +kt•..t�- . ► • i{1�t,(� tfr�s4as ..>. *c1, tm' �iY,t i !' }l1' '.; ` 'y f/ .# o,±<!l s•�Y +�... � y �s �` .PVC `1a t j� .�'1.� �y� + � „ � C) +��',���`. � `�ir C���,`,• �ykt�!"� � ; .�e 3 1 i t�i1•� �7 A' v., �+ :�i'"" !ilk � i+� � � ��' '�1k *� '� � r! �L �'� .�}1 �.�• t . � "�` is 4 t r r Ri '+4 LAND USE ACREAGE Cw GOLIJENWEST STREET TO 13EAC14130JLEVARD EESIDENTIAL Acres Medium Density 161 S High Density COMMERCIAL General _ or-Serving MIXED DEVELOPMENT �'•r. ,1 ,r Recreation/Support . s ;.y / P, +i Office/Residential IOTAL 43 Figure 10.6 7j 1 ri I S� 1: i+ t, �t 1 i 1 r 1 { '1 a 3 ?I �i t� r'. t� 4� w� f , K ri M, ry}� t Ift {Rg: +r� t7 '+,;�r�r•1' k,{�;!J��i�'` ''�;.w�'kli +r'..(�� 1 r�-.'rat ��� .� '��' + rppi... �rl}Y,''(fd'1,Qt�,+t2.;•�rV7� ''tl,}Tr I '+,. I' !' ,},y,..♦,+, ,LI.r y.1.,':r♦+7. rI'' y, ' '1 t ! } {{t; rr I ti_ L�'t. C ''."' � ! � (d' -I'kt .S-• �r -, ' ,., �: I'S+.r y' ►� � '� rR+1 !+�1; , .'�', `1 ':�r.1 'i:.i { 1 .1 � ,. �I, , .+,-' i ',', d �r G r4` ► � { `ii r N1,• � •. 4�rt �t, rvr r;=i!",�,1•�;•.4�' 1'.a'' j *•Z'r ��l �i ,r.� �'�'$i,�;J y 1 Y�^i►� 11'".11 h ;�, ?.t' +f '.+t1,. t.+.vi� i .,�{.� fi'r t.'.�? �{}: �r � �R°:/.• Y li41'Yi �.'.t. jk+� ?'i t, 1��� � 7�rry f F'. :A t �'h a +(. fff �d+ •l t 7' '{ ,y, Y ,i{t k' s A .� �L. .+}+ t na +:r 4 ,i t a,,, ,�• .0 ;1 . J j t 17 tY 1:y;y j} �.'l ,r `ctt w1 r r �t a-•. 'Z"{-�, ry '� � y+ , ,+"y 4 _ •� r'� �f �� , . .�t�rt } � i i .� i Kq l♦ 4 '�'�,+ !'> ' 1 'f' )�c,, i �. �,•1 } t ( .,.�. , r' - � ")!, � ^.�+, 7 ri. , t� d�� Ytk�t�i R 4;'.,}+tip 4 .o n y';: r y- ,r 4 �,�,�++ ,'�'�. •.�ti�1� ,� }{� �:� r~ �, >� a� ;t � t 1, i x L I��,I J' ..t �{Y :+ �� ,t �M 1 � � � '1 ! � � 1, a "�r' i,r�. tr + .''r 1i � ,' i 't` a„a y, ,..+ ,• al. .l +.'+� ,\74 }1 1 ;l kkZlrl=.y*•' 1;���f�"i..r1 d�i ,l," e,� I �'1�'i hl}} ������ �d `,I/�' ��'! t i' ��! 'iL i,} rS 1. a ��1•�.:'Y;i},,k.. ,ti" 'u•R,�C,��y�r7E;��x t i, .i is •�t .> j(yt1+`+. V.. �f� R"`+"~I`,+.�k`� ��'}'I'J3S` 'Sti�lr ,�+t��r,�,��,��d l S,,rit' �1 ��uCq� .�, 6A ti"z+�t �(�.',: � ��• �I 'l ,45�LL•+ � , �' .�+ i,l � i � a r ti r �`r ,r �. M t �1,+G1 +�.I r L v�"�' ,r�, t • , �ii�` ,ti? , C:�r yi�; s t4 , rt $ . ti arrt •l,, to 4I 'slL��+'iEy#,4 IR {r ryr`� y I + {{ �a t�. + t F 'v, �. J �}, �•.' t i r �' �\{± {�� to � df�':� �h'l i lS,','iiti,lt�i f �' � �. l 4•a, �7 ) f 'F y 4 �,, ! + •, 4��"•'i.C�J '�,e 4 4 �4K♦`�a'r � � ,..+ai n)7 '�1°:) y ;i a '�f4 c,'),, JJ`; �,��� 4't 't St T ' Y �� ��t !tj' '�y..r ,�F+ j�t.i, Y� �dy�, +i���j�r�titbbb�" �{gLa '�t.►✓,.�� r(�,��yat1 . �y,��'t�4ti t�rt{-��a\,,S,� �?,, l� �1;< 4t pi`r a?"'f 1�� , �t '• "� ..y 111 ��? .��+�-.1� . i *�� 1 �,x J!F ty}1�} �t •:�4�j .i j (,tY) �i.. t ,+ ,,.,r d 4 s,+ `lrll.Sy{{! Q ,+� l �h• 1 ��? u`}� h'`' t.', �rl r,: z } t j tY, a i .s"t j/7 r,. t � ,�!5t l �.. � ` {r+,�i� ";A" /2�' �+� _i�:�; '+;'�•� ��rt,�6��RT ,����'{r•� 1.i1��`d•�. + t���•1�3.� �`�1 I„i�i� \'�fii1�� ���M�"1:�� {�t{����i•;+�'��C4Ir'�`lJ�'�ak �i"#��7�tk1�j(,11p '" �, � �r�� 1�fiu��� � � r � �til�,�'�j;C",Y 4'tt ?'ky�'���� b����+ �'d,S`tj�{���}���j�� � i i a art '-t,€i +r`J,�}- ,�A'T -,' �.,.•ti". Yl,��li . ,l� 1 .� .�Rj +� t ��,'4� �t+ '. �' it � ;y+l' ..�t t `�3 '+ ; �t• r r+ s4' � h l, !, � t 1 t.�,y�, � � . ' � a , , a t. � c <"! �c (/;�'.r,(" Y t,,��11' 1��� � � q ��q' jw! .T t i$''�i�.l ,4$' � �)• 111 �+��• � C4ti�"i��**6 ���"{y !i, ''�r+ `'r'{,�'i .�V'I �• 'y5..�.T, ,�{'� � .}1�,, .v'y.�1+..�,..`, f.1. �s �� i `YT l. .� lY� M. , (1• �`S•S-ti: ,�. �{+.�i;r. t�;'.x;1'1":r��"►' w �hr � I .y�.-r :♦� ,F Q[ ;.1.�..1 r 11 .�c � -�.� ��' t,�j }}yy44 (�., t r) 1.. r. u� 1' ,.,,..4� ..vli+M�.M*)f� ri+� { ft � .1i� ��K �� nlj� ' ).�+♦1r1� �` �''1,4,"�l1 r+. '4�{, 5,+ 'F�}�. ny1J...,�a�'e'.� i.� na 1� r r 111� r *` '�I � -.�,�.i.�..4� �.jN ��..�t.,. �+� a � ,♦ +S) r f1a^+"a�2}� b��.1 LL.5:��t..lw4L 9 a, T�}f4L,t:'t.. .�+ „llnr +i .. .,d,�., � it-.��" ►o%� {,. .. It�`:..,v# ,+�'. Mn ` � `' :!_ ,�` � • a ..� �, r�� � 1 r `;fit , N.- 4 {' a �`e ��,p'• y ('� �+.� .�'t'"`+" � >>i S�� s � r�, r tr� �'. ' � * �.�; J .!`. �y g ti r .�t ����'.n�'�.. � ! t • ! N F 10.4.4 GOLDENWEST STREET TO BEACH BOULEVARD This part of the coastal zone presents several particularly complex Issues which ,led to a different planning approach for this area. It includes the City's Downtown, the future of which has been a center of debate within the community and the focus of numerous studies, plans and proposals. The Downtown is an older commercial area; many of the structures were built In the 1920's. As this part of the City aged and new population centers developed farther InlaW, the commercial activities declined. In the 196019, proposals to route a nnw freeway near' Downtown (since deleted) prompted efforts to redevelop the area. The City envisioned a significant role for Itself in this redevelopment process and its early strategies Involved the use of a municipal agency to acquire Downtown properties, consolidate lots and rebuild the area in a coordinated manner. MRny property owners resisted this ape roach, feeling that the"use cf eminent domain was-unjustified. After years of controversy, numerous studies and several lawsuits, the City,changed. its approach in 19716 by adopting an amendment to the General Plan which°allowed significant flexibility for new uses in the area. This strrtegy was Intended to encourage private sector effortstu revitalize the Downtown. This part of the coastal zone is increasingly valuable principally.because of the burgeoning population in the region and the scarcity of developable coastal land. . However, many, property owners are reluctant to engage in new development now. for fear that the State and City will forestall such activity until the coastal plan Is eomplate. Thus, to n significant degree, the 'private ' sector is welting for the plan to provide direction for Its development efforts. Planning .for this nrer is complicated by other'probloms.` First, this.part of the coastal zone Is choracterlied by small parcels and highly dispersed ownership, which has Inhibited large-scale projects. Second, the City's flexibility regarding allowable uses has contributed to a diverse mix of activities - - all oxtraction, a commerce, pn!king lots, residences. Third, the City pasred a seismic safety ordinance which requires all structurer, to meet certain safety standards in order to,better withstand earthquakes. Preliminary studies indicate that most r of the buildings in the Downtown core will need to be torn down and rebuilt, or reinforced, to meet these safety standards. t Superimposed over there factors, the community hao engaged in a long-standing debate over the appropriate "character" for this area. Some factions argue the,, the Downtown should remain a lax-Intensity teasido village. Other partitrs envl3lon. the Downtown becoming a regional center with high-rise building r. { Still others want something "in-between," a more Intensive urban area but not a regional high-rise district. The Coastal Act adds still another set of considerations' to the planning process by requiring cer6in regional and Statewide :oaAtal concerns he Included In any plan for the area. • i i i .. ..... ...� v . .,. ... •..1 Jla'...:.i:tn'.J.J;'Ki M.'.. .L'S.Ai•1:'.:.1•........wY... �C� '� I.1 x, e t r � t '�' } tr }i � Y' � r. r�' , �' � .s `� (� � . ' � •ski k ; 4 . In preparing the Coastal Element, City ttaff developed three alternative land usa plans for the area from Goldenwest Street to Beach Boulevard reflecting low, . modercte, and high Intensities of development. These alternatNes attempted to provide a range of planning aptlorm for decision makers while reflecting both statewide coastal priorities and local community concerns. The three alternative plans were analyzed by staff In terms of their probabin Impacts an existing development and character of the area, traffic, circulation, parking, public works Infrastructure capacities, environmental quality and fiscal constraints. The plans also received extensive public input at meetings and hearings of the Citizens Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council. As n result of this planning and review process, a single land use plan was approved for the Goldenwest to Beach area which Integrates State and local Interests and priorities. Before the land use plan is discussed, the existing land use patterns and General Plan designations are reviewed. Exfstigg Uses The narrow strip between Goldenwest and Sixth Streets Is part of the Townlot section of the City which, like much of this area `of the. coastal zone, is characterized by small lots and dispersed ownership. Many of,the parcels which front on Pacific Coast Highway are either vacant or u:pd for,;oil production, while many lots facing Walnut Street are developed1 as mold-family residences. A few commercial establishments are also scattered along this strip. The area between Sixth and Lake Streets is often referred to as the Downtown "core:' This was at. one time the City's principal co-6imoreial canter; ,now, however, It is characterized by smaller scale uses -- surf shops, thrift,stores, coffee shops and similar establishments, primarily focused around Main Street. Land uses become morc mixed farther away from Main Street and include single-family and multi-family residences, oil activities, parking lots and commercial establishments. At the northern tip of this area Is the old Civic Center alto, bounded by Orange Avenue, Main, Fifth and Sixth Streets. � 4 'Clio area Inland from Lake Street and Atlanta Avenue is part of the Oldtawn section of the City and is devoted to a mix of single and multi-family residential usov. A corridor which Is largely vacant is located along the eastern aide of Lake Street. Two 'hotels front Pacific Coast Highway between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard. Inland between Lake Street and Huntington Street, the land is 1 . largely vacant and u3ed for some all facilities. The Inland area between i Huntington Street and Beach Boulevard is partly developed as mobile home parka and a golf course, and partly as medium density condominiums. I � 1 t''•I ..*MTq+.M'.nlwVr4Nr+Vn4s...a....+ ..•w.er.ww.rM..nM.•n.....A"diak.?..{i v41:I':..a..�K 1': w'..F.k".Si 4N.n/w'r. l t�+.n.n..t-,.a�.rn..,.t IV•a..an I4�...a.�w...w...........r....r.w'r..w`.ti.RM+.I./.MA.w...Y.MY, i T! t I Existing General Plan Designations The existing plan for this part of the coastal zone utilizes a very broad mixed use category which has contributed to Its diverse activities. This designation now covers almost all of the "core" area except for two blocks along Sixth Street. The two tiotnls, the vacant oil site near Atlanta Avenue and Lake Streo;, the mobile home park nearer Beach Boulevard and the golf course also fall under this designation. In the existing General Plan, the mobile home park site next to Huntington Street is planned. high density residential; the nearby condominiums are designated medium density; the Townlot area of the coastal zone Is designated high density residential; and ►.he Oldtown section Is medium density residential, Building Heights The land use plan which follows Indicates appropriate heights for various areas. It should be noted1hat the threw and six story.limitations would not necessarlly mean that the entire Proa would be built to the designated Iimit.1 A specific plan, brother zoningdeviee, would be necessary to Include open space, setbacks and other considerations. A "step down" approach, diminishing heights nearer the ocean may be desired,,along with phasing of development. This will be considered In the implementation phase of the plan. LAND USE D1-SIGNATIONS The land use plan for, the area from Goldenwest Street to Beach Boule'verd,is described In three sections - Goldenwest Street to Sixth Street, Sixth Streot'ta Lake.,Street, and Lake Street to Beach Boulevard. Where approprlate,.snore specific implementation concerns (building heights, parking treatment, etc.) are discussed. kk GOLDENWEST 5TREET TO SIXTH STREET I ` This area is comprised of 17 blocks along tha Inland side of Pacific Coast Highway. ;The; entire . 5Z.5 gross acre area was previously designated high density residential In the General Plan, however, theJots facing Pacific Coast ' Highway are commercially zoned. Development In this area has been confined ` primarily . to the residentially zoned lots, with much of the ocean-facing highway frontage remalnfng vacant. r li Asa moans.of discouraging undesirable strip commorc inl development along Pacific Coast Highway; the coastal land`use plan designates the.majority of the t area no residential with two nodes for visitor-serving commercial development ;I -- an area between PCH and the alley'between C-oldenwest and Twenty-first (j 'streets and`between Eleventh and Fourteenth Streets. These two.'nodes were selected to. concentrate commercial development at specific locations near :. existing and proposed traffic signals and beach nccessways. See page 47 for additional information on building heights. I+w•'tA1•���at�::i...:�•.-1r�4;d'ins:}Mrsrt:J,•.a�.s.,..nw...a.....t..ttrf75.:r•.•s.3.3r.:.•+.w:.'... .,♦su a,aa::-..+,►...c. ...f»,.,,.v,,,.%t-:.:Jo'J:w+.al . +♦•.*+at 4!Y• .....+.- A.+dI.S*trNMl:itTr.T.S�'4fM♦if''�'Q.Ci� • 1 1+• I MMi I The remaining area along Pacific Coast Highway h,nj been designated medium density, residential with height limit of three stories.z Within this area, a base density of 15 units per acre Is assumed,.with Increases up to a maximum.of 35 units per acre on a fully consolidated block. Development of the residential blocks is Intended to be regulated by a specific plan, which will specify parking, open space, and setback requirements and variable lot area ratios to encourage property consolidation. SIXTH STREET TO LAKE STREET Often referred to as the Downtown or core area, the portion of the coastal zone between Sixth and Lake Streets is the focal point of the land use plan because of Its existing mixture of commercial and residential uses, community identity, and ret Alonship to the Pier and beach. Within this area, the coastal zone extends Inland to Hartford Avenue, encompassing a total of 66.7 gross acres. The coastal land, use nlan designates the five blocks facing Pacific Coast Highway (15 acres) for visitor-serving commercial uses to capitalize on their visibility from the highway and relationship to the Pier area, which to oleo designated an visitor-Serving. Many of the existing businesses located in the first block area are v:sitor-oriented, and this Is on Important area visually in projecting an image of the Downtown area. Inland of the,ltrs': block area, the land use plan designates 15 blocks (43'�acres) for a mixture of office and residential uses. This area is currently characterized by office and commercial uses oriented to Main Street with.the outlying areas toward Sixth and Cake Streets predominantly residential. T.ie office/residential designation la intended to encourage the preservation of Main r' Street as a business c.+rridor, yet allow nttractive mixed use developments with , mid-rise offices or condominiums affording ocean views. -To further the mixed use concept and because of the unifying nature of the Main Street.semi=malt improvements, visitor-serving and other commerciat uses would also be allowed to locate In the office residantlril area subject to approval of a conditional use permit. i.. The remaining two.blacks within the Sixth to Lake Street area .d acres) have been designated for general commorelat uses. This area is oriented to Main and Lake Streets, primary routes of travel, and Is Intended to preserve a *: neighborhood commercial area. Z See pogo 47 for additional discussion of building heighto. !: f t•, f ? +•.'r+..r.'-Y..ewMn.a.++•�.• ........--,....+.w�+MI.IA L.LSY ^s.S.iA'.R).r31M/1w 24 of S..-.n...Y,seerYV.�'....ronw`w...++.rw w«..—.-..««,r....w.�.....��...�..�...�.n...�..�.ry. :•. •y t 1 q A six-story height limit has been applied to the entire SIxth to Lake Street area { as a means of encouraging the provision of amenities and recycling of existing uses, as well as allowiml the possibility for vertical mixed uses within Individual developments and providing opportunity for ocean views.* LAKE STREET TO BEACH BOULEVARD This Lrea encompasses approximately 260 acres, extending inland to Indianapolis Avenue at one point. The: 98-acre area north of Atlanta Avenue 1s almost completely developed with a mixture of single family and small multi-family uses. The overall density of this area falls into the medium density range; therefore the entire area north of Atlanta Avenue has been designated as medium density residential. The area south of Atlanta Avenue encompasses a3 total area of 162 acres, consisting of existing mobile home parks, hotels, n golf course, a new condominium development, and a large vacant area with all production. The coastal land use plan designates nearly 90 acres of this area for residential uses. Approximately 18 acre9 of the area along PCH, on the cast side of Lake Street has been designated4 for,visitor-nerving commercial unos. A portion of this area Is vacant, and the portion along Pacific Coast Highway supports a restaurant and hotel. This visitor-serving;area Is intended.to provide additional area'for visitor-serving uses which-will tie the downtown core area to the uses located at Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway. The 62 acre area located between Delaware Street .and Beach Boulevard .Is I owned by the City of Huntington Beach,and leased to the Huntingtone B' ap".Inn' . � '. and'Driftwood Mobiie Home,Park.and Golf Course.. The n6rt1iorn`h'nit-of�tl?il13 site is designated for. residential uses with a'mobile home overlay, The rest of this. area coos "BEer-W-designaiao as, commercialisupport recreation. to ref act oxistinq uses and as a potential future cite of 'amajor commercial/ree'rentlonai! development to complement the City Beach. No height limit Is applied-to this �. 10.4.5 BEACH BOULEVARD TO THE SANTA ANA RIVER ' This area of the coastal zone encompasses approximately 610 acres between Beach 9oulevaard and the Santa Ann River. (Fivire 4.1.) - Exlsttnq Uses: ' #" The land ulna In this cart of the coastal zone era quite diverse and confusitl. •i Much of the land between Beach Boulevard and Newland Streets is currently l •"° variant and in a natural state. Adjacent to these natural areas snd southwest of We flood control channel In to mobile home park which encompasses 36 acres and contains 306 rmlts. At the southeast corner of the mobile home park is a travel trailer purk containing 140„spaces available for rent on a daally and weekly basis. A strip of land between the mobile home park and Newland Street Is partially vacant and partially developed with another smaller mobile home paark. .A parcel nn the corner of Beach and Pacific Coast Highway is used for a boat sales establishment. ,w Sao pans 43 for udditional information on bulidI22 height!. •.•..rr+rw.►s.ww.+..-•- .•. .....•.„..+..•r•.a.r+ss:vt«7a::,'ti: ,T•:i.ti.'�.t«'t»Y1'i:i.':i'-i:a:.}::i:u: •o.+Gr:n..•i.t":att{tA.1't+l4N:;.,y,:•t.+.+tw�.1r,Mp.4sW+►t...anHta►fiYiV'L jPftl�.'C�e�_,'•, 4 1 Publish June 10, 1982 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING COASTAL ELEMENT REVISIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will beheld by the City Council of ,the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 21st day of June lq 629 for the purpose of considering Coastal Element Revisions. Said 'revis'ions address the'cnndi'tions suggested by- the Coastal Commission to bring the plan into compliance viith the Coastal Act and other minor ad3ustrnents to the land .use map and text: ;. s; Copies of the proposed revisions are available in the Department of Development '`'•`t" ,:. Services. t / i All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express "tf:eir OpWons for or against said_ Coast 1 Element Revisions further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main �Street,' Huntington (leach, California. 92646 (7)4) 536-5227 L.: WED ; June 4, 1982 CITY" OF HUNTINGTON BEACH.' By: Alicia 14, Wentworth• City Clerk -, ..++.r+w+.'+.ntsrnxm4stc.l'"1���Rj'!\:.;:)la:,�iF,'��<'�%+,bh�tiff'r::Ylr1�'♦Y.t;t./;'•,+ti:A%tir,II1'.iw'•nFs7cri+t llF.n:,:.rtiw.».Xus..w.+•i+.r+.w+a+....».ww.X'•ewr..sr++ee r+rtrq+ • ''t 1 t . k LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing.will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City f Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering 11&=9Zze FZ41;'el�71;1' ,plrt''ge^ Ceaa L z4 6�7� 4vit Saidlhearisig will be held at the hour of � �'�� P.M. ,' on 2- , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic enter, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. ' Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this day 'of CITY PLANNING COIJISSION By i i U"'WIC+M.SI.r`•'4,.�Zi1fiMrS:;:,`.�..+'t4 T7^ri'.+.C_•K:31:ti:'.i•L'.i..: •sa:.'r{'1'.:. :.:.'.:a:i d,;f,x.::..'.. .,%:1,11..e4J'lwt.a.r,r....r..'a.n YM•..w+w«..r............-... .•. .�.«..�w...x�..+'...wr.,..�%f..� t'a 9J F '• Y t2�.► / .L � 1 r \` •Y t I i NOTICE 1.0 CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM (7010►SZ221 ��lY1C �l5/o/v.S TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: � zt. FROM: A,1 PLEASE SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATPACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE n.- DAY OF , 1971 'I AP's are attached AP's will follow No AP'a Initiated by: {: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other t. Adoption of Environmental Status (x) ' YES NO 1• Refer to �w �� ���3 �� � Planning Department - Extensions for additional information. * if appeal, please transmit ettact wording to bo required in the legal. • .r ;!' ''�+✓:f.'�.lS.}�iw�+.(PfN�C\I�t4 AI'7 W.�'f.1.yN•ww�+.+M.M�ti.T.M.t'.RW'AN..,`jU4•an�.wr.e.+rr.t,w.:to•.u,•+•r..wn ss.nt'•1+Aa.�i/Sr,T`,`J�iL:;F(i]aYYC:+/�c•w.+u.++,vww..�w+•.r«++...w..r..�..�...rr++� } r r RESOLUTICN NO. � A RESOLUTION .OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REVISING THE COASTAL ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, desires to update and refine the Coastal Element of the General Plan to better meet the needs of the community; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed changes and additions to the Element was held and a report on those changes and additions was prepared by the Planning. Coinniissirin; NOW,' THEREFORE, BE IT PESOLVED that the'City. Council' " hereby approves the changes and additions to the Coastal Element listed i SvJ�t A, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City 'of Huntington Beach, California, on the day of August, • 1882, by the following roll call vote: AYES%' } r NOES: ABSEIM. i' ABSTAIN: Aw •. F niM.•.w++w.+.wwe.•.---- •••„�n,+r+v.rst.•uin►y7V.L'4 �,'F ,. t .. .. •"iitii.'ev^:1 ::.."Z';.Y:iwl''wv��:.G?tNsit.�i.V.WIdASV.'J.7rrrsK..y«.e.�+w.+.•r.....+w.�+....+-.w—w,.yww:p.��IF,.K�I"Z�yM•l. 1 3 � � � , �'• � +M 1'. � 1 S 1. t F . Department of Development Services June 21, 1982 IdINOR CORRECTIONS TO "DRAFT PROPOSED CHANGES TO F1UNT7NGTON BEACH COASTAL ELEMENT" . On third page, fifth paragrpph, starting with "Add to Page 110, after first paragraph" change second sentence to read: in specified areas, bonuses for mat--eeryaitdt� tel: parcels of one-half block or more may be granted provided that the 'following conditions are met: " * . On fourth page, next to last paragraph, change first•. sentence „to read: "The north t�ortion of this area has been designated Resid 'lal Conservation and the south portion of this area has been designated Commercial Support Recreation." t On fourth page, last paragraph, change second sentence to read: "Prior" ,to permitti>>g any development of this parcel , the City will require the submission of topographic., vegetation, and soils information identifying the extent of any existing wetlands (if such' exist) . " •4 l if . On fourth page, last' paragraph, change last sentence 'to read: "No further scsbdivisaion of any parcel shall be permitted which would have the effect _( dividing off environmentally ,sensi-- ti` tive habitat from other..portions of such parcels for which urban uses Are permitted in the LI)P •until such time as the barman ant protection of the wetland, if ani, is assured. " :} 's 11 ii�.;i`.•a?'::+t4 d:y:.�,.2C:�.".Yx:iXLrnit.+.ti�'�'.?*R.s ratilntr.aa,.re•.....«w'stew+rwr»-+'w•.+......+r..'•+..•...............,..+.+..+....w..+.....w+nw�'+—+,.r.....+.rw.r,•ry'a'.. ^ •,12 - r Y my c?i Iie CITY OF HUNTiNGTON BEACH 4 v 4 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ►►wu�anr,n+c►t �' fJ O To Charles W. Thompso !� a'm James W. Palin, Director City Administrator o Development Services E:,bject COASTAL COMMISSION ACTION ON Date September 17, 1981 CITY'S COASTAL ELEMENT Would .you please transmit the following summary .of Che Coastal Commission's action on the City's Coastal Element to the City Council.: On September. 16, the California Coastal Commission acted on' the City's Coastal Element at a meeting in San Diego. The Commission, first of all, denied the Element as submitted. The Commission . than approved the plan subject to certain conditions, These con- ditions are not binding on the City. If the City does accept them then- the plan is approved by an administrative action. Ii the City does not accept them, the City 'can suggest alternative policies to - those conditions and resubmit the plan for Commission- action. The conditions recommended by the Commission are all those ,con-- . Mined in their staff report; these are related to housing, we i t- lands, access, the visitor-serving designation and intensity standards for Downtown. The Commission also changed the land use designation on all existing mobile home larks in the coastal zone to ."mobile hotne district.'. It seems that such districts would ,permit only mobile home parks as the principal permitted use. h recent legislative action may have bearing on•.the Commission's 'action. A bill has been passed by, the Legislature (the "hello ©ill") which largely teduces the Commission's authority on hoes- Ing issues., (The bill ha's not yet been signed by the Governor.') • The staff is analyzing the Commission'a recommended conditions and the recently passed legislation on housing and will prepare a re- - I port to Council on .the implications of these conditions and le is- lation' for the City and on options available to the City regarding the coastal plan. J1-1pi.MM:j lie ' I •�T"-'pMt.•r••—w�rww.. -..._-. ._.. ... . ..... Nr w.-.ir.r.M «..r ..0 MVYr•rw�t'Y.h..r.•--.w.aww r�.MN.•+✓�.......vim........ +w...«..-...._...• ...n. ...__ , Alie, REQUE n tia/1 / I , 1 " CIS.. ACTION Date y S_sntember 3, 1981 M Sihmittzdto: The flonora a ayo an — ity ouncil uubmhtedby: Charles W. Thompson, City .Administrator Prepared by: Department of Development Services m i Subject: Appropriation of Funds for Coastal tommission Grant j Swtemant of Issue, Rewalmandation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attactiments: ' STATEMENT OF ISSUE: f The City Council adopted Resolution No.p 5013 on July 6, 1981 , requesting ! a grant of $20,000 From the California Coastal Commission to com ! the certification process of its Land Use Plan (Coastal Elemeplete ntThe Coastal Commission approved this grant on August 190 1981 , and the s.'. contract was signed by the City Administrator on September 1 , 1981. The period of the grant Will be from January 1 1981 through r December •3I About $8 ,000 of the funds I981 . un s were expended it fiscal r Year 1980-81, leaving approximately $12 ,000 for work to be completed in fiscal year 1981-82. Monies expended under tills grant will be reimbursed to the City as the tasks outlined in the work program are completed. ".A RECO,MIENDAT ION: Approve a resolution .arpropriatinl; $12 ,000 from the grant C ' used. for certification of the Coastal Element. urxi ANALYSIS: The City received final payment from the Coastal Comma.ssionor f the . :original !'hose II grant of $79,201 in .May of 1981 , and has applied for S.B. 90 funds to cover cost overruns incurred in dev6loping the Coastal Ele!ment 'prior to December 31 , 1980. The Coastal Commission ? set . aside an additional $200000 in 1981 to be used by the City to, {r complete the hearing and certification process for `the flan. In this amount was requested by the City, n b A grant approved y the Coastal Commission, and the contract has been signed. When the tasks described in the at work program have• been !,r completed, the City Hill receive reimbursement from the Coastal Commission. Meanwhile, work has been proceeding 'toward certification. The Coastal Element was considered by the Regional Coastal Con' t�.! at a public-hearirg ort May 11 , 1981. The m Regional ommission did Approve the Element and the City Coun g cil subsequently not changes to it. The Element was resubmitted to tile StateoCoastalme Commission in July, 1981 , and � will be considered at the Commission's • / � ry P10 4141 i. Y• SM•wewe��Mf►wai,lMlN.11Nn-M11i.T'.w0.MNf'Tw�M aN.wwr�hW 1Y,T.TeKe I0./1L'J.y11HGN1t•..i'.i.'.,j..7.::.•4<. ''',; f ' .. +I'.flw'.:.IL^.:�+e1iraAra'Yt/k.,tW.V4sW.'/.y.S s.M?a••..r Frww�w.'+w,w� w "l?�,� r i l t �s 5 i ,��r �'� '� r'r` ` 't��f{'�°, t. � tl� ',���Y.', Xti •t�dl ./)���r"��A` j.,rt��c•}�S� 1 i} r �r� ',, � r �C��• t r+ �+(�� ,. /t q., '���'� ,�JS� � � ,��.►� � � � �i } ',lyr4'� �{( l•r4 'C'Yn'k+� �• 'yt •r+'� ' rt� � � �� �f �}�'1���.t �� ,�'. (> is � 3 . ,►� 1 +� � � � � � �* r� r,�,�, 1 '�iY c i'��1 < y��• r �' ti� ,�`, +� �+ �'��.' r'C+t: rly t, t�� r►'� Z��• :,�j . j�,l+• 7( � a 3' ,f 4 n,;�� y!+ r, �• r` �•r 'r '� � 1CJ �s� `' � i '� �• . +ti i`�°�+ 1 y y ' Y7rYrt, •r, ,+r �'•i�. r 1 1 1 IL x- 00,•f r l Jy 1' 7 r� 1ti a. 1: t{ L r�Y` r` i 4. S1� ��;k. 4.it. }{),.,�.'!J)d �)lti`(�!� �ti;:l r,�N..��y�i Y (�► c �`,:� ` T " i� � +,a, • r�a;,.u; t;,r + ,,... {„ ! ► �� 1 ,'' + r %* 1 r A r.. R 1`1' t. 7) r v.a r !. , J ki. r 14� y ,({ �. ^� \` ►r� ! • ! i� ff h °' 7 � � +r, St• I ..a f �',r +hr � ,•�' .1.7,^!'Iw �h� T�F ■``k't.r .! t�''�Y i ")It:l- , ti i.r .. •YL''�+ ,-�' t4 4:.) t'1 4 �;1�4 71�. ! . ,' a - +, 1 ► � y., �Y.1C ,�+ ={+ )"/.iy �'. / � �`r y� .r 'c ! - Y,t� �t4,,,}.{ s 15� .'� .•h� 't y , +1 is. T4 JGh• 4 1 *+ �. rY { , Li. J Y+Il. .••� S�h,k•+. r� ,. �4S tl�!� � y, ,�! 'S`�1+�r� i .'FYI�i v+., ,i.,ti.)'T��f�� • rl,r;'�� � ; Jr �� ,�.��4:+f.•'!�'+�Y. '•�eti 'y. +tf r!• �+ + -vM G 1 wit y 1 `_ • n , .SAP• 1;�' i t t �'^1t' + . ti 1cy`�•+t , '1" 'x+r 1 ti �.4.{. ° ! t `.+�>r.'j r j r tl: :, �+A.�±'_.��it!S>,'FF ... '� ,1��• 14' i1 G`. , r .. s r � � �' e a i ► I:�r).hr"Ir G`. '� J,�1iy'•-,F. '�' ,'r ) { .�,4�'1 �H,:•.r�•'",; �,1 ry+'�1 ,.+! t'• r�, � �{, ••r+'r+S "* • r w+. i• ., t� +.�' 1 ti c d , v 1 1 !. / '•�is +r' + �: ,.r�, � ,'�� � r fs•�• i i,r,�" + ,' '` '^y r n a � ?t r �:';� • r •�n ��i�; 1 ++ � a � 'r�.g c 1 �; VK .;nJNk V•' r•h1,} .5 1�" ti3r+.. � �" •. + <'rr r't;, ,,x Tr�e�r..`�+ r - d* a, `Ss �r•,. '. M.'`1' }, '�' tY� { ,.kF rty4 r '!py•� �,.'[. y,+. r+ I;j�� i 1,G t FG fit. i ,+tf.•r 1t d' ` \.,' � 1' � Ar �: i„ + 1 v. �! 1 it rl. 'F f 1 5" +•S� +, yf 1 3 1 1l + k J + * ,t. -. t. Y� 1 { tf , ♦ y ik '�-y r a,+ F }� y4 .ri �+i J'.+ 1"• n r !' t f +�,4y�'t,Y + tij.� ��? '.i ,�,+,Y1'ka'IA�`'1 Ty k� ; MM�_� }{ �'{ ► !. ,. ��f 11� f` n. yl .1� l�'; �r�, 't �` L'. t �. •�r4{f�. s .', X��i � � 'r" .j ! ",F t' rr �kti o ht .v -.!j s'.n� r t:1+'1 i .fit.? ` 1�±•y'11 l����'�,,'f!;'�Y �/r•} iL a 1 1�f i + �f r 4 { .` q ;. r ;, + ti w�l t i 1,R rs � r1�•' � irJ� r r, ^!'�h'��, ai i)�r �r 5 ,Y'x: � +�•�. �� � - try .� r � ,*y 1t �'y,� �;�,'.t��, tit 'A,y4+ 1�.;� �r 4 , 11 h1'� 1�S'f !.k !4 ,�, Stay (r! �M•;` -!'• +t J Y �4 )Ir M1 R,ti„ 1 rA �� r� .� ry�4 t rl y � Y '� '1t't S �1.}�((r !< ,,,,..11,, r�J.1 t1 t "all l�'.f •Y��•�.� (�y 1� �,'Y _irinf 944. •+I t�. la yl •{,f 'ti, I i Q � � !\ L ti �.J, + ! �� fl `+ l i i '.�� � V•, . s .� hn ,' 4 � r r a i I ,} 1ptak ,X�i`r�f � 4 ► ,off t t' :� { t�• 1r•r l�'+ ))� '�' Jt,r. li� V ,tiM �..�r,l�.• 1 �•�j�f ?r,.t. f 1+1��!.1 ak :r � � ,fir�At�( yy+ �'M �r�:(+p4NJ ry��,�!�ti A+�P`r���r } r} Lr� 1L1 *,:• � }i'i,a"'r .r •i l �,J r�,a;r� �+s5�a k.� ��.. �.. �' t1 ��l.� +•� S.; "1 I.b+ Y +��.}r ,t..� + t t 1 :q'a t * I. •4 •�++' ! n4! � i'l. Sr; 1+.�.:ti* � 'l.�,r ' �'` k r 14 t J•• , F 11 4 l�K �+ ,�,r4s i y J 1�.. u {c i t fit , yGi1}}r+t �t:a {tE tJ' .a � �}�3 Gar}} ty�r+tl��' rl�t} r �! �? dr'[II j- rI r fsi.li,1 �"s' Xr •`. (.., ��•liAli �� + 1 +I�. Srf' +tltr Jytli�'' h�y{,•+� t�'�: ► „tif � '11 A' s r ♦' .� , F'11 S.�1:5 +,�t•, �� F1r' � .�' � tl . r, ►� ((,,�,., i t. �1 t1�L:++1 y� ��1? �, ��' � �. � i.• , •"f �, + r�t ,r:; ', '�• ,.•, �. •�riJ 1.�L �.{'1i ,x'. t, � -f`,�,,, y�. R 1� I!� t�'��4 51<!4+ �5�1 tY..1 �r. 1 X 1 S• ! l+.t t��•� , !''�7 �,1� !1'r'� ''� 1♦Ji� 1 yr Y'� �!, r . !•�' i� f z �!' L (.11 '1! ! 1f'�J 1' l �r.1, S , !�(fi a r� h. S+, l a y!r 4v.t� ( t r r tYrl,tj (" '.+� ,�,,�^( j� 1 7.rw )'ir, +}� � � ��1� ,a�, A,�4�i1 r �f(•j',q�/t f( r x9a1�' I•�',n.4.4 f ti{� ,, �i 1 i?J �; � y r 9>y +k i + r 1;, '[ r ��4. t "< l tv 'y� 11 ?) i #e{ 414 w% 4 ! r 1 � � . '4� y�r!' 1 r "�tl•i t } j.1'� +1.. t �r( [;�(y L,f11�'`tl • � � '1�rl;+awr��J'.'rtl:••�{TY°��*�,}� �i�i�h.�t ' f lrG.s�. }t►6 .. ±tJ,,� !t.{iy7(ry ; + i' .� t4'1 ��+ h� ,�44. °=" ,Tf. 1 ,+ r.,. •�� 1, y s'yy �•4�*�11!1 1.� ``�•..+rnr,. � hr��f``.t.>Ic � �i i'�y ka�, �,�'��'+.�+�.���i �� •r- t�1 ,, +Y� �+G� � * '1 XfrFl•�' Y��� 'tyY��r��"y�'^��.><^;�'+,:�'��r�l�,>�•.����a:4,�',11.7A+�: '�i� +�{ `t'A�+/j'i�jf��1,��(t, �,y�+��t►4�y ���/ fi��.�r �-Qf � 4 } t �rt.�1s 1 1�[r�,Ylj.; ,��f. ;�i� �j� J. �'�,r���ru �.� ,I.ii;,-:�;r-,rlGy;�filr•'Y�� '1 FI��.G`,��. �t��: �,.•Nrt',1!„ ��,!�r,, r f.,�ti•�� ,�.t. , r+{k", Iv. ,{' " ► ♦. .�., r 11 r C4' ' } •f;i��+ y n� °."� i RS 11 + t '+ l� /� `'k .5 . r Q41` " +j •, i ,� - ''t G(Ave ' +r. 4 li► .}�* tl+.: >zilrr� s^�.S�c r+, + } ti.er, {�y +� + a t'r , ,. ryj t�3' n !i ,Q �. ;3r''�s ;as wl:`'� ti f '+. lt �=t .{+ yS' r ,�1'ty ► (ir�a t."ai�; . G !{, t1Tj�ly��{' tii�s � � �� �r� '�,. �•.�`I,L o� � i �rii ! � t 'CCK.'iy s��,+'� .'I( ��j .���r .t ,f� ;n r1)r !'` ,,. �{{i��t��r�rr ,b, i ��� •�++�� ��;+ �{{,:J + ,�"� �"� S'��`.+t+'�y.11��1r�1;r1'LL�i'"4 �R��'�!1r<I•r'rS+�'•i1,r �,.,$�ih.���� �ji,�,�'.y� J{�� .�1r 2f�� +� "y � �'�(.+ 2fe� SI � yG� Cyr `�'i�j�(. rt r�• e�r i w y:T'a fit; t.�{i; �.lf �I r�l�. MS'• 91 r Yf�r'?ti +w � 1r ,} �,ay3, 'F*• ,"�' 1 i'+� ,� val�. �`,iiy;rlr"`:�1; r ,�f +1r. � t.r��'J� j4�iSE�'t•'.t�JY•.j� �,'y't �, �r�y.* �� d�'� �� tt •v t ��J� ��!�F �" F•^".if �" r"'�. �'!! 1V4��.�c fl iy }�'i` r:..f:�•"'++.(� 1`1i.���,�.}• i4' c� i ��'"}y»'� �' 4:�iTt ��. � l� �St '�'�yi�r ���, ayJt,`�, ,� ,�� a i.. �yt•> t '^.7g i nt) J +t� �.C.�� 'F. �tf •1� +f` + i • :YI 1�j 4 � a A. f'r r+P,+ !..�t� ! h.` ,, � , �+ �..,. i+ �t p r � ,••# ,r,� r � �y{..i.�µ1. ,1 �:► �'�r !�� � ,+•'{•, t'' 1 �v 1 '� � xt1,f'� A , i�t � .�. �,.. •�� tit �i5�`. ;<r� � �' a. .Y-�j.21s r'f..L F tl_. �t ��.t� 1�+. fir` . �1`"..i�l .�w}.i� ! •wt,l ...+4 . ��� �, y�t�.r �j �a .�� r1�;S ��,,+�,�.�Y�,1" I ��;I,t �':.� <"1."7i11A .'� �.' � ..It'•?'!.A � J { i�j.�1t`.,�rbT' !4.i�-�t��iT,+�. ',�,,�'�i �}' � ,7•��.;, � �lr t„� � k,'��it',h,�+�'i�t�i 1-F� ,,,i3� i,�r � 't v,r<*. ��r � i t'=�4��€ 4 �, 4t+ u yy ,� S � t a{- �,.`�t.�.i S" •�t•�`({ii'1 tt� :i� jfi,r, � Il.t�.�u'i�l ,l?'���e ���itiP.��lll SSi%'+��t�I+.i K�-���4.�{�!1,Zt1't�l'r1. Y�r�;jiii+!'d"`,7r�:i�7°�FA',�ft_��� rl1S�l:tt��$w��"t`Ib����.k: � .�:�����"��ri:►�kll��-`� � 1.�..c 1+� ,��t'l'2�)��3`��I:i.Yrif� . .►�.fn x: INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION r+"m WON UACH r Ta Charles W. Thompson From F. B. Arguello .;"j,, .City Adminlstrator Chief of Administrative Services Subj , Request For Appropriation To Fund pass September 11 , 1981 Oct x The Completion of 'the Certtflcattan Process Beis;ive to the Land Use Plan FIR 1 81-"70 In 'response to the Oeveloprsient Services Bepartwant, I am hereby,submilttIng 'a Financial Impgct,Report relative to the request for the appropriation of adequate: funds 'to allow r6r the City to,cnmplate the: cer(I flcation pr6eass of its Land Use. Plan. These funds In addition to the $6,000,,that wire likewise e3xpended 'in FY19$0-81 are to be relrabursi:d back to the City by the Coastal Comm'lssion at the end 'iaf the project. It has been suggested that'an appropriation of $12,000 wauld.suffice Far expenses to. " be'. Incurred.through FY1981-82. The City Is guaranteed re1H)ursement by Callfornla + is . Coastal Co mission Contract Itumber 1.05-193-11 . The net'cost to the City is the :)65s;of -Interest earned on the cash provided prior to reimbursement. .. F. B. Arguello Chief of Adminlstrative Servkes FSAIPAlcg X ♦ r •i 'tom 'M,..SI ij� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT ProJsct Name Financial 1 Impact React for Grant Fund Appro�riatfon Description Request for advanced funding to facilitate completion of certification prc- eess relative to the Land Use Plan. 1. DIRECT PROJECT COSTS k 1 .1 One-TIme Costs Land '..,"Eon urn , raciAcquisitionuction ties, Equipment Other Total Cost 12,000 12,000 !,. 1.2 Recurring Annual Costs Additions . Matey a s E utside ... i Pa roll Personnel Su lies Services Revmnues Total •Cost ) r. 1 .3 Replacement/Ranowal Casts 5. �tA _.. l� I 1 2. INDIRECT COSTS Loss of City's earning capability prior to relmbursenvnt of funds from Coastal Commission at project's completion. ' ' y'nxVMMrvs+l.4Y r.au-\..i�a7'.0.it;14`:\ei k'•rP.,..n..1:..:".;.{. ').;('. ,.••, • . i — .. 1 t• t .. ,i..r.s! w+v.a«..rrw ..-............. l i . ll Financial Impact Repor. . Page 2 . • 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A r 4. BEN£FITS'TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT The approval, of the advanced funding_wiII allow for the necessary work to be com- • pleted without disruRtion to the department's previouslY scheduled protects Tt or:necessitating a rearrangement of their Qriorities. 5. 'PROJECT USAGE 1l, Daily. 1. . r •i ti 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING Subsequent to City Council approval. } ` .1J r . . is 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT ' Department to either absorb necessary costs within the currently autharized funding levels or terminate certification process. r ti • 4 l 0 E I V E r x INl L-11 UPAItTMENT COMM CATION JUL 01 1906 F, CffY OF NlfHt oN em +`r,•+� W. Thompson mp games If. Palin t ►'i I v Administrator � Director, Development Servi ,rr:.;Irti►art�r+nt. OF '1'ttl COASTAL July 1, 19I#1 i r !`#►� s.i t:y Council at its May 18, 1981 meeting voted to *Ippeal the Regional Coastal Commission's denial of the (`It;y's Coastal Element to the State Commission. Since I h.d. time, City staff have been working w;.th the State r. V,)astal Commission staff to resolve some of the ,iitsues ,itet,t1 which the Regional Commission balled. their denial. ;;c�ritc: progress was made in this regard, and 'on June 29, 1901 the City Council adopted sorde clarificationa to I.he Element which will eliminate several concerns which I.he Commission cited in its findings for denial. I4uc cruse the City has made changes in the Coastal Element, . it: now has a choice about the manner in which it presents Ilia modified Element to the Coastal Commission. ` It' Lhe City a eels the Element to the State. Coastal Coirinintsion, t Q Co misaion :oust first find that the duniat by the Regional Commission raises a "substantial i issue" related to the Coastal Act. if they do not find i a substantial issue, they can simply uphold the Regional t Commissions's findings and not hear the appeal. l if the.City resubmits the Element, the State Coastal Convnintion dust cons der tho entire Element as modified and make its own findings regarding the plan's conformances t ;( to the Coastal Act. The important difference between the two modes df prosanta- tion is that on an appeal the .Commissi.on may find that no substantial issue exists and the findings of tho Regional Commission would stand. If presenter) on a renubmittal, the State Commission itself must address the Element, apart from the Regional Cotam ss vn'ss decision and findings. Rased on this anaiyssis, we recommend that the City present its Element as a resubmittal and not an appeal, to unsure that the Stato Commission itself acts aitd makes findings on the plan. if you concur with thin recommendation, staff will, pr+epatre a letter to the Commission resubmitting the Element. However, we need to know if you feel a formal action by the Council directing us to resubmit, rather than appeals. is neceasary. t•. t, Resubmittal of the Coastal Element: Memor July 1, 1981 Page 2 Regardless of whether the Coastal. Element is resubmitted or appealed, the hearing can probably he scheduled for ' the Commission's meeting on ,august 18 -21, 1981 which will be in Santa Barbara. hater Southern California meetings will be ,in San Diego on Sopteutber 15-18, 1981 and than { in Los Angeles on October 2U-23, 1991. The Location of eit•.her ,the Augunt or the September ?netting Is not especially convani©nt for Huntington Beach. Neverthelec,a, wo feel the hearing should be scheduled as szon as possible so, tMt the City. ctn receive "feed back" quickly.frc= the- Statee'Commiosion directly. and continue the uteps toward approval of the plan and the ratuxn of permitting authority to the City. In addi4~ion, :it should benoted that the ,Itct9iotial +Ccai eai«an has approved a Phase III Grant for the City in the amount . of $50r00P for the �purposa c;f developing xoninq.'implement:.ation for the. f.oattal, Element,. The Stato Commission, is ex0ected to approve this application ,then it meets on July 8, 1931. Because of o time deadline and other regulations, the, avail» ability of these monies may be doubtful if certification of the Element is delayed boyond than summer. In -light�of thane considerat:iona, uea recom6nd..that the City esubmi.t the revised ZRlement as soon 13s, pt?sg . or ave ir.hie—hea� "iri�ng -s t`a 3 u"u"al: mo�a ng. gnlaan you direct o`th#-* we`d, wo wr T a k"thi omm zis on to sche,dulo- the hearing on than resubmitted Element as soon as possible at a Southern Califoun a moot"3`ng. JWPsMMtp 4 I ,.......,....--.-.,...., ....... ., ..„ ....... .» .1- ., .2,ac,....r+,, -1l".r a..}...w ...•,..<..,..+.. ,J! .'At.: ... , ..«,.. .,w,.+...w a ..r.,.,wnu+.+»...».-- -'` , f INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION KA"M N MACH TO Charles W. Thompson ames W. Palin Director, City Administrator evelopment Services ;. Subject UPDATE .ON COASTAL 2 LEMENT ate June 3, 1991, APPROVAL PROCESS For the past three creeks, Development Services staff and State Coastal. Commission staff have been meeting to further refine the remaining points of� contention between the City and- State regarding the Coastal Element. Toward. this end, Development Services analyzed the. Cor&iiasion Is comments can the 'Elevent and :suggested 31 possible changes which we. felt would satis;:f+y many of the concerns of the Coastal Commission, while not changing the City's Element in a major way. of these, 23 ,were acceptable to .the Coastal Commission without further modification. Thee changes proposed by. 06vialopment Services which are acceptable.,to Coastal. Commission staff are shown on the attached pages. Eight other suggested changes are being further analyzed by, the Commission staff. They may reconuaiend alternative language which would allow, them to find these portions of+ the plan in conformance with Coastal Act policies,"too.", It seems that language agreeable to both sides can be developed, . probably within s few creeks. The.eight proposed changes Vhich the Commission staff is still analyzing are related to the following areas; { >�or` specific language regarding - the mix of uses: allowed 'in the � visitor-serving comrnerci.al desigration. j The rewording of existing policies requiring vertical and lateral access to and along the shoreline. The.rer-w-,6rding of an existing .policy to preserve,ac+cessu ays. The phrasing of a new policy to periait, other public or privateagencies besides the City to accept offers of dedication for accessway. There-wording of two existing policies to establish more specific guidelines for buffers around sen3itive habitat amens. The re-wording of an existing policy which states the City will develop a prograrn requiring continued affordabili of low and moderate income units. �o-'.si'�r , '+�•..• r.. r .. ., ..,... �. . ,,, r .r.a. a .. .r' c.'y, .. .,..:c. .. .n...... _.. ,:�=.....:i.::',:. r .:i.'y;c.��t 1�1�r. t 1 Page 2, After these items are worked out, there are only three major areas needing further nefiotiation: 1. Larid uee categories for all the "wetlands" including the Metropolitan Water District property adjacent to Bolsa Chica, the small piece of land just west of Beach Boulevard, the vacant lands between Beach : . Boulevard and Newland, and the vacant land south 'of the Edison plant to the Santa Ana River. 2. Specific maximum permissible intensities for the Townlot/Downtown. 3. dousing policies in general, but particularly a replacement policy for low and moderate income housing. Although some, progress has been made tioward developing compromise language ,whi.ch raay satisfy both the State and -City concerns, these . thrp6, ;gsue. areas will need more. time and. negotiat.i.on to resolve. The "we'tlands", issue is a particularly difficult one to resolve and different solutions may .be proposed for di€ferent, areas in the City. ' .if an accaptable�conpromise cannot be reached on one or more of: the "wetlands.". areas, an option isto "drop" that area from the plan for further study and separate consideration. . Assurting. that, the points outlined above can be resolved and that the pro- i posed amendments are acceptable to the Council, tha: housing 'replacement ; issue may be the only remaining stumbling block to, they Coastal Commission ' staff Is rscom' ending approval of the plan. The Commission in the past has never approved an LCP without a replacement housing policy. The staff mould like to bring to the Council a complete "package" of., { possible changes which, if accepted, would allow the Coastal Commission- s ta€f to recommend approval of. the Element. As indicated' above# progress has been made toward reconciling the differences between ihe: State And City; and in fact, the large majority of Coastal Commmission staff"s problems can be solver by simple rewording. o€ existing policies and 'other clarifications which do not involve major changes to the Element., Staff feeds .that on July 13, 1981, Council may want to 'hold another study uession for another update on the issues we are still working on, and to further consider possible changes, MAV:nb i 44 I i ..h w.'f ti:a:air+.....,+,-..-.,. - -... ...... ... .. ._ ...... ..._. ... ..... .. .. .. .. ...,...,_...._... .. ,. _,... ... ..•..,,.,.....,.,......-.......-_...._�-.,.. ,.«.,..+� F PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH COASTAL ELEMENT NOTE: Coastal Commission staff have indicated that the changes proposed below address their concerns in on acceptable manner. Sectii.n 2 divider, "Definitions" Add t1 'following definition: CONCESSIa l STAND sma -sco a—Gne-stog structure used for sales of refreshments and beach-related sundries. Section 4 divider, "Definitions" Deletes "WETLANDS Lane: where the water table is at, near, or above the land surface...morsh plonfs:' Sectiori 6 divider,-Definitions" Chango.deffnition of wetland as ;allows: • "WETLAND•;, ', • :;;- , . :; ++yy,,,,,,h t�`i „ ' . „' :;.• ; '., " 1sfTAct defines wetlands ais 'iands within"tile coastal zone wfiich ma be covered perlacanx,or permanently wit witti s iallow water oRd Include saltwater mars s, swampst mud1lals and fen3l.11 Pg."110, 5th paragraph, "Hi*i Density" Delete the following sentence: "The adoption of anew zoning district or specific plan would be necessary to allow residential development in excess of 35 units per core:' Pg. 111, 8th paragraph, "Commercial/Support Recreation" Change es follows: Visitor-ssrwa I22 Cbrnmerciol/Support Recreation -This;tfesigrwt3eri catdtttortally allows commercial facilities asa major use and recreational.facilities as a suppart use. A'rninlmirm of 50 ercent of the site shall be devoted to re ' ec'tioiml uses or iic wn s re. General cornmerclal uses may allow allowid as con ilonal uses above t rst floor but shall Be ffm-NeMo no more than 50 p2rcent of the total floor' area. It is especially appropr ate...as part of a coot i"Zted development. Pg. 133, odd at end of pa agroph S i� The least tern nestiM site on Huntington State Beach is designated "Conservation". Pg. 133, add at.end of paragraph 6 , New builds s on the ler•shall not exrxed 35 i'��et in he�i ht rnerisured frorri the ..h sur ace o the pier. c access shall be required urovnd the entire pe'r m r of t p �• . I Pg. 143,Policy Rf . Changes as follows: Limit diking, dredging,'.and filiing.of coastal waters '.wetlands, and estuaries to the specific activities outlined in Section 30233 and 30607.1 of the Coastal Act and to those activities required for the restoration, maintenance, apd/or repair of.the' Municipal Pier; conduct any diking, dredging, and filling activities in a manner that is consistent with Section 30233 and 30607.1 of the Coastal Act. 5253E/4663- .t ' i r Pg. 144; Policy 9a; Change as follows: Approve only that development adjacent to wetlands and environmentaily sensitive habitat areas that does not adversely impact habitat vo ues. Pg. 144, Add Poltc'� Prohibit all'uscs wlthiii'the`Least Tern nesting site on HuMi22ton State Beach except tFOse relatiTt-3-Mbitat restoration, ` Pg. 146, Policy 12b Change as follows:. As part of the iAiVl l4WA14adv4 61kkklX %42=i process, require the mitigation of adverse impacts from new technologies employed in electricity generation to the maximum extent fusible. rg. 144,Policy 12c Change as follows: .. }, Encourage unitiiation.and consolidation of e' xIs1In'q oil operations and rp uire"the consolidatloaii of new" or.'e anded o`eratiois n accordunci+ tvitli olic a to t maximum extent feasible anlegally� permisalble when such activities reduce the area usia for oil factlit es, are not more mvironmentally disruptive than existing arrangements and (3)do not jeopardize public health, safety or welfare. Pg. 147,Policy I2d Change as follows: Utilize the "-011 (oil) Suffixes to ensure that coastal dependent energy extraction Is accommodated in areas designated other than "resource production," except for ! !'tfdHdc+4M1OW,=Iranmenlallt+sensitive hrabita� t areas. Pg.'149, Policy, 13g Change as fo!IDV'13: As part of the /Ci )• � �f/dpi bfyf/i1kk�►1�v4 permit'process, require that a survey j he conducted along the'route of arty new pipeline in the coastal zone to determine what;if any,ooaatal resources may be impacted by construction and operation of 1 pipeline. Pg. 149, Policy`13h Change as follows: i eMibjd4k$jg�JM the routes of new pips.-llnes and transmission lir-s to avoid 1 important coastal resources, including recreation areas and sensitive..habitats,' to the maximum extent feasible; pipelines which connot be routed to avoid such areas ; �Y OKI shall be constructed and maintained In ways that minimize the Impacts from spills or leaks to the max(mu`exteM'feasiblc-. appropriate cleanup and spill prevention m..asures ,s x1Wlle Inchlaedin a spill contingency plan. j Pg. 149, Policy 131 Chan a as follows: j �kltljddS'/�d�'�t�Iq�,t3gSi3OUtomatic shutoff valves to isolate segments of +' pipelines r�ry rXinU tmz_ardous Itay jejdVof bbj/11$d$)paving through important 1 coastal resource areas, including recreation, sensitive habitat and archaeological areas. 1 i i I 5253E/468B ``-tign•.✓,a.t::are.+...............�..... .. ..�...._._ _ _._... . _. _._ _... . .. . . _.................. ._ ... .. .._..........._... _.._._.. ... ._. ....._...� ,.... ..� ,j Pg. 149,Policy 13] . Change as follows: As port of the permit process, require the mitigation of erosion in'the siting and construction of new pipelines. Pg. 149, Policy 131 Change as follow,ss Encourage new 150119whi transmission line corridors to be consolidated with existing l3fKd11qW1jF electrical transmission corridors, where feasible., unless there are overriding technical constraints or significant social, a@sthetic, environmental or economic concerns. Pg. 149,tAdd�alicy..-13m. . .. . Re ire ne:w'' f eliries includli offshore=to onshore lines to be consolidated in ' existing_pipe line corridors, where teasiblei unless t ere are overt n iec r:a1 constraints or sign? rant soc a , oest et c, environmental or econoritic concerns. Pg, 149, Policy 13ihn Change as fallows: As Oat of thelci/s41d� ►iifrhrf�lk��ld�► rri t process, require r+iitigation measures su repair scarring, grading or other ve getative remova; resulting from transmission line or pipeline installation or maintenance through methods Including but not limited to spreading topsoil removed in pipeline trenching over the surface of the construction area; affected areas are to be re:vegetated with plants similar to those in the area. Pg. 153,'Add Policy, 161 ,. .. s. . . . . : . :. Ensu4that adequate , kin is rovided in all new development in the coostal zone ut z ng one or a combination at the following: - Apel?, the City'; existing parking standards ct a minimum Develop parking assessment districts to build off-site Barking structures Utilize new parkin, q,standards specific to the Coastal ?one in coniuction with the eve opMent o of oft-site earkTn2 strat—les. Pg. 1539 Add Section on Hazards: Egli c- 17 "Incorporate`thee policies of the City's Seismic-Sofety Element'as the ma or component of the L.L.P. addressing hazards Tn the Coastalzone. Pg. 153 Change Section numbering in "ADMINISTRATION" as follows: I0Fi 100.5.10 l7 18. 1 5253E/4jr)BB .:�.: • .y.w:.1:. :.,..:.L.'ll:.r:,:t.::.:: -W.'-a. '.i n•.rts,.r •a.r.«. ..—.t�rns+C+ft6.•'^Te.,.tSfn! 1 • !N7'!tL' Superior Court GrIniz STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH• CITY CLERK f ROOi'OF-PLIOLICATION Hearing-C oastal Element County of 0tw4e Rita J. Richters�` �� R wt�o a rof w �: net jam and at all times herein mtntioned was a t$tiren of ISM >,yt the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that 1 am not a party to,not bnteresud in the above entitled matter, iVWY 't that 1 am the principal cierk or the printer or the it raR us Hunting ton e.acg Ind. Rev. r � a nawspsper o gen: arts tlnn,pub! n tie City of rpz'vW *VFW" Sayi taru�xAtd +rt Huntington Beach P tisQ� County of Orango and which newspaper Is published for the dlseminatlon of local news and Intelligence of a grncrd charac- ter.and crhkh newspaper at ai! times herein mentioned had and stil!has is bona fide sulu:ription list of paying subscribers. and which newspaper has been established,printed and puh- fished at regular Intervals in the said County of Orange for a petiod etceeding one year•, that the notice, of which tbw annexed is a printed copy,has been published in the retular and entlte issue ar said netnraper.and not In any supplement thereof,on Ow(olltwrina datca,to wit: June 1.8+ 1981 4 � b 1I 1 ctrtify(or dtclate)under penalty of perjury that the forego. log Is true anti correct.. Vated A..............Ganden•Grom................ Califti th ydunc. 9 .i LBiRneture k°� a its,naae.Csr.e1900�, ; �^'1414 ..:e�._.a.,,......+5'_'�, .. .. .. ..,:i:_ .. 1 ....yr:a}.. \.:.. .. .i, 'rL�: .tom' . . ..:.1:ri�b•.x ,. i1: y.d.�//:;lt;�'"�'E' Y pity of Hu ngton nti Bach ����..:. ._-�.;«,�.. '...:;•! `' P.O. EOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92649 (�p OFFICE OF THE CITY ADRIINISTRATOic TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Charles W. Thompson, City Admi nistratoif '�tU ' DATE: June 23, 1981 SUBaFCT: "WORKING PAPERS" REGARDING POSSIBLE CHANGES TO THE COASTAL ELEMENT Attached is the most current draft of proposed modifications to the Coastal Element which the City staff and Coastal Commission staff have been working on. Further changes may be made to this draft. Both staffs axe still working oL a package of possible changes For consideration by the Council which, if adopted,• would allow the Coastal Commission staff to recommend approval of the Element to the Commission. Please note that the first three pages of proposed changes are the ones presented to the Council on June 8th and are acceptable to the Coastal Commission staff. Two changes were made in response to comments by members of the Council: Policy 9a has been changed to further ensure that reasonable development can be accommodated near wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitats and Policy 161 was changed to delete the word "existing" as related to parking requirements. The final nine pages include all the other proposed changes: These have not yet been approved by Coastal Commission staff. Development Services will present an update to the Council on j the proposed chanties at the meeting of June 29, 1981. ` C%IT:KM.df I firth , 'K 4 Telepbone(714) 536-5201 �, •!t•`�t4`C1+ny' ..i�y:i.. ..+.'' ii.•roi ,) _4 — _ .1•, • .t.. . —... '.c CG:.C:.�i'••�yTii.1!;:�r.:•.._.. i�iGx:F:�Rx����'y't H" :1t 'i'' •fit 'ii. ? .-i.t .. .f:±'11•L :/.� 1.1 Rnh 1`l�• Y III' •. ' f t. ; CITY OF HUNTING � BEACH *AAf P.Q. Box 190 DEPAnTMENf of DEVC CALiFtlfiNiA 92GQ6 BUILDING DIVISION 014)53G-5241 PLANt ING DIVISION 1714)53"271 June, 22, 1901 Dave Smith California Coastal, Commission South Coast District 666 E. ocean Blvd. , Suite 3107 Long Beach, Calif 90801 Dear Dave: , Attached are proposed modifications to the iiuntington Beach Crustal . Element, prepared as you know, after numerous communications with you and other members of the Coastal Commission staff. if the City Council, were to accept these proposed modi.ficar'ionL, would the coastal. Commission staff recommend appr:)val of the Element to the Commission? Thanks for your help. �Sq nc ro'ly r June Catalano Deputy Director } L�epartmen' t of Development Services JC:t*l:jh Encl.: T . s i 1 i 1 t t •it¢'1}�TiL'1:\'ihai�i tyt;.igi++l+vJ RTraww>,,w.5rw.,e+.n....V.w+"r.•w�ww -e+,e+u ..;>..J},':(TP;i'Y\:T':. Ny,"^.Y:,Y.!.sY. ?i Hn.T.Y`!.>iF'rtn4+.w.........�.. ^r.r......r.w., w...,...�-..o, e+..s...we� ... 1 5a 1; ,ire. S PROPOSED CHA14GES TO THE HUNT11,IGTON BEACH `COASTAL ELEMENT, igOTE: Coast'at Commission staff have indicated that the changes proposed below address their concerns in an acceptable manner. Section 2 divider, 'Definitions',' Add.the,following definition: CONCESSION STAND Ar srtta -sca e, one-story structure used for soles of refreshments and beach-related sun ryes. Section 4 divider, "Definitions" Delete: "WETLANDS Land where the water table is of, near, or above the land surface...morsh plants." Section 6 divider,,"1efinitIons" Chnnge definition of watlond as follows: "WETLA.ND: T e oasts Act defines wetlands as'iands within the coastal zone:_w�hich�may be coveral pLilodicallyor permanently with Tallow ow water and Include saltwater mars -�s�wamps, mudtlots and fens'." Pg..110, 51h parngraph, "High Density" Delete the following sentence: "The adoption of a new zoning district or specific plan would be necessary to allow residential development in excess of 35 units per acre." Pig. 111, 81h paragraph, "Commercial/Support Recreat ion" Chnnge ns follows: Visitor-serving Comrnercial/Support Recreation -• This ile.signation conditionally owe commercial facilities ns a'major use dnd,r'ecreafional facilities as a support use. A litinimuin of 50 •erciant of the:site shall be devoted to recreatianl uses or up blic opens ace. enera commere o uses rno e a owcc as can t ona uses move this firsl floor but shalrUe Hmite to too more than 50 percent of the total floor area. if .s especially appropr ote:...as part of a coor inate'd development. Pg. 133, cid:1 at end of paragraph S The least tern'nesting site on Huntington State Beach is ciesigr►ated "Conservation". ' Pg. 133, ads at end of paragraph G 1 New buildings of n file Vier shall not exceed 35 feet in heir 1, Measured from the surf ace of i to pier. Public c access shall a re u rep aroun(tTe tint rig per meter of fTte er. Pg. M3, Policy Bf rhangas as follows: . ' Limit dildrog, dredging, and filling of coastal waters, wet lands, and estuaries to the specific activities outlined in Seciiati 30233 and 10607.1 of the Coastal Act and to those activities required for the restoration,mnin enance, and/or repair of the Municipal Pier; conduct any diking, dredging, and filling activities in a manner that is consistent with Section 30233 artd 30607.1 of the Coastal Act. 525.3E/460B ' t�• s , E `'^�x��'�.Li�'a"iaw.w{•v+.•. .......� ...-o..,•r•+arn�r.,A.\'ar.x ►.rraa_A•►a]�r.f:'�..lw: :IiYY^ti•::t:«..er.^...'exU:.���.s.•. __'^-.,- ............,..... ..- .�-..... f f Pg, 144,''Add Pa(icy 9e Prohhbit`al1'uses wifiiln the Least Tern ties t ose re attin site on Hun It; tan State r t o a tat restoraf ion. 13eacli exce t Pg. 141, Policy•12b Change as follows::. As part of the , ,S�dr��� �fn1�, RO Vrdnit process, require ihc: nit of adverse impacts from new technologies employed in electricity igation maximum extent feasible. y generation to the Pg. 1440 Policy,12c Change,as follows: Encourage unitizati li on and consolidnal of existing all opr_rptions"oa�th re" iii cansolidatioi of:new or.ex aridecl o reratians�n a cordpr�ce ,Nit h o� C . max mum er,tent eas a pn a re fhe area uses or or g14 Y perm ss c w ien suc octrvit e+ Y 13o to f iucpe �+ t+es, are not more environmentally disruptive than existing e uce arrangements and (3)do not jeopardize public hrnlfh,sofefY or welfare, r. y Pg. 14T, Policy 12d Change as follows: Utilize fhe "-Ors toll)suffixes to ensure that coosfod de ender accominotlated In areas designated other than "re so dep Production,'+ UJOHIAMI I nmentnll 'sensitive habitat crease t energy extraction is except for Pg• lot Policy 137 Change as follows: As part of'tt,e Oi'AAMM4d�d►,{►,ftft5l,f,t�i1'�►vG ` cifiit process require be conducted along the route cif any new pipeline In the coastal zone t 1 whet, if any, coastal resources may be im lzon fhe el survey' Pipeline, patted by construction and ppeCotiori of Pg• 1 fi9, Policy 13h • Change as follows: "t��►�riuld�r; a iirs the routes of new dsipelines and transrnissi Important coastal resources, including recreation areas and sea maximum extent.feasible; Pipelines witch on dints to ovoid dot!{y shell he constructed and maintained innnot that ln,1.to avoid such'areasto tine spills or leeks to ft�e i`naxirriuiri extent feasible• p lydmize the Impacts from preventiar rnensure$7 > j a nc u e appropriate cleanup dM spill n a spill contingency plan. Pg. 149,Policy 131 Change(is follows: 4:tih�i'Jdd�rlcitilil,t�j n uire automatic shutoff Valves to.Isol Pipelines rur[�!lha7grrlol,s ! nuid Jea(d��V +sd11�1d�1 assin tchsccimertfs of coastal resource areas, including recreation, sensitive 11 bif t and archaeological911rtt areas. 5253E/4G8© _ .. .. ....,•L'.: •41:ti.ii.M II.,..`v:.:St:f stfiM a�4"�Ifirr 1 •. sr.R arvr�.A,..+nSdWwMa+raH.rrw w�q-,+vct►s0.'ftfC x t - .f. + t t IN :�I.Y N' '�g :t # 'iy '\ t PM7.,d,+l��#7 ia1r,� r ^ j1'Il y! `S3�s��1 �y�i�RZOD,,i, .�y 011, 'v ;t?+;. yt^ttl.' f y�+y If'i y..�nrk,f� {, F tppit �tII''S.+.".II X • Y�'t:'r^�1 �lljjjyy//.�>`L{ 'Q ,a`ti• � � iy�lf ,• Rp�L •,�`{�4i(f4 'fit + k �Wi4 1s �t �{Y + t�'f". �•G. 1 • {.T• c. nry,� +, >< !. (! .k1 �71 t t. t ���{ i� �� ., •f?.k #,d W (A{d ', 3F ,s g � tr,, .tz. 3`'1�•` `+ � �. �,. sti f;t� r, �t at; ,} :+ � � tII 1.• � � �4"{ � ° �,,� p,,+� ;fit �1�,j t. y,�i,�ro�}, �`�7.,. � ��� r, �:r1 , �i i x�i •,�+� `��;�f r",r �� �r .u�i !k��. L ,. �t, 1 t ',a [r� s3 {# ;i 'b'y- �yF� t i �5`F4t{tty) ' ' ` t i ' •" � � �' 4t hS�"a It ��' ' , f o;.4j 'f. s� '� `t y �,,•.,,�i'r !al,.... .r� r x i � � .i+ .�! }t� kS. Y d. I ry1 v'7�M1 { �•r �bL t.�{: g �a�. .�.. �� �" 1 r Sf�' I., �� �, ��.�> "C , y. t . ,�S �.'t. y t •,�#J,(�. a { f.f .fir :rt�j. �.. 2„i�t �k��;'� ^�i f �� '` � � �� � �A'� } {�d,,v h # ! ..r .1 rt� ' 'i, �ft�dF,.1E,•.t"t �. 1+ .; to K 'eta'+1d 4 /�p� , `> is i .°t' t►R �}�'c`*�`f':' tier 1 r t .f fi :.�k�•1��,.NNtt��t.r�x�a�,+,,�'�l•� t ���',`r, � :asi�,��[`r�,�.,,1�R�it`,1�i`1�1., :t�Y�{rl�t�Yt!`���3. t . ,I t. ' I3g. 149, Policy i31 Chani a as follows: . '' racess require the As part of the � s,J A(A( 'Ardr!'j1 h1V'f �r � p ► i •mitigation of erosion in the siting and construction of new pipelines. Pg. 149,Policy 131 Change as follows: 1�tldd tronsmissiai line corridors to t Encoura new ¢1P where feasible electrical transmsson , existing 0001104fa . are evereiding tecirricai constraints or significant social, aesthetic, environmental or economic concerns. Pg. .149, Add Policy 13m^ Re uire Me eliacs"includici offshore Ra onstw t ecrecare overonsngaectmical' �� corric ors w icare ens a un ess constraTnisrcant s�occ al Gest�rc�envioun-il nta,or econom c concerns. Pg. 149,+Policy .111 in Chungn as'follows: ��F�' a Y:; r ,,l4,k c� unit process,:require mitigation AS dart of the ��CYstl►i �hU�rd�frf�4 �t►•..^. measures to repair scarring, grading or other vegetative'removal resulting from:,;.g tronsmis"sion line or pipeline installation or maintena trlen hin c ove the surface of +t but not limited to spreading to removed in pipeline . the construction area; offccfed areas are to be revegetaIed with plants similar to those in the o-ta. pg. 153, Add Policy l9 ' Ensure that ode vote ar{cincj"is rovided en all new eve "+rent tin the coastal zone �r u' z ng one or a cam nat an a t e a ow nc�: Ap yhe jt•' w parking standards at a minimum ' Develo uricin nssesameiit disficts to build off-site aridn structures .. Utilize new: arl<in standards s eclfic to'the"Coastal Zone in conjuclion �iith t tie eve ailment o a -s to par nq-sirate cs. pg.`1531 Add Section on Hazards: � 15.9 HAZARDS nl c 17 ►'Incor orate the olicies of the: City's Seismic-Safety, F-lemznnas�the major cam o.�ent o f ie . a ressrn iazor s n t i 153 Change Section numbering in "ADMINI5TRATION" as follows: 1 Pg 17 113. 5253E/46813 VAIM P LfJ...M++V.V+..rtVi«4T'Y.P•YFA.Pa.FKW'•�•F.+�''"` +"^• , • 4 tKl%•+.VtI'.h:n'}'.».�,:1.::,'.•-•1•�:��.i./".,:.:.+.s.t�,::R\ ' J ,, r .4C,eM�^'�,•.'i••is t r t + t l Y �� � t � t� �•. r '� t 4 � ' •t �t c At f s 1�iV4r 'dtF'i t a Mall"" . k+ tt t, a 4 17:T•.. R�:'r I1" R"' '1>�.. ,a }fl; ;Y1i}.1 #.'�ltt. �+1 A a tx �kyt 'p 4t"• dyYYY t t {',t y , ' ,'S.:i��14�if�:4" �''v"� ,� �l..f�{`�At3;Y'! •�'� ''�.r�i�„""'.. � ��k�Rst �1�1�•.�'�,:L... ��jTt XL.�'���f�'�?� �.� y�;�j :I,t ti°�.,,t{.L{,•.h i't! 1 t* , !' at.1t"Z '4'.i. 1 /rZ,ti{; :v r r^t 'C';a "��+i. 'y.� T !;` 4}S k', Y,lt�, 3a. ` N ., 1.'%4 (. i t "tY..f �.,Y r.. l tY ,t. ,?"t•>4S�t} kl'�, 1,1.t*�'ti ,4 *, �*{ ,i( y `;, li{.I"1 j� �;Ct .! Y 7 a t tL ,8` ro ''Y�y�4'�+,yt I q i {Y tJ6�is x e:Y �. L +�S tiRa .FS Yf�! ��+�ri t fit + i�5B 5 ,.1 r t y y Y L ! t e �t .1 � �{�"w' t, b� ;�L t a q",s• � �11• -� ,�, c e, 7' !''�., t^`{,'a t t�' �t' f Y r �r a'� �E � '�`:'��,. ?�.�: a. S I{� �- �` e`� r� } t `y !` ° jj t w } "� 3 y •R 1 I L � ,(,� t� l�r y,��I `�. Q t �;yt: �y, C � t ,� ti ;�,�,15' �: 1.�� m ��.�'`�f ��� ►}i t.: ..L. t l � ,{ Z � d�'.�. �}�� t� l 14•!.r:+�, II`/t�;J'j�':`�'�s�'1'}'{S"{, 'CT S,•� 7�7�t�3�3:��t7��:�`�,..i�-�;...t. �} p ��,+.. M yY;�^i� wCd '"{�: ,Y;'! �'y��rrN,',�.f�+j�,':y t i'w�,�`{� jX,. ;'��T } i�. .�* � 'i�t'y. T f c•.y�,it y'�, qS t�'(}{�` i.# r: „:� t� '. °. ,:1�72. .. 1 4 .�;'A•,,•l\•r ';l� t• i }.' 1. t :t 15� k ",r_1 1, 'r i'�' S 1t sr,�ip�'�t ��v..t ��,: •t:�i t? �' ��•�i��� t E '�,'� :,��#�-r���} ����t.t }�, �. ,k�t��+,{, 1.d. ?x$�� i t, „��� •a 't�`.t,t'l�tit�� �; A} ;it,.ie {� r 4 r�;k �. �;:�t�t��at� ,t`S•,� ,�'Z[` x't��, #t .;�, �,}' "#� 1,�t��y �a� �` ���y��'���",F'��J.� � �. ,�. t� h�. r-'� .��: 1 � _�' G �S �{'j�' Y T2•.f� .,�� ` �'+''}' :�r "} r.. ft YL��`� .{f i \ • `u t � .� � t `x,,. Y f '�' rrr "+9 �.`���.4 �J�S� �{k� t } �►,�S'{ �#`�^�Ytttl����l�ri, ti '�f �l�i �L`i�' .���, Y�l.'•'"`� S��t� ��,a +�� ^��' /��ti a �y, � �.t�' �'� �j .n. , ES TO COASTAL COMMISSION RESPONSES COMMENTS ' r . . i t of the Power Plant. II A. Energy Area South i. 1 Pam 132, paragraph 7 As- discussed in Section 7, the mud dump poses special problems for planning new development because of the dikes, wet muds, and the possible presence of hazardous wastes. Until these problems are resolved, the coastal plan recognizes the existing use. by 'aesignatinq the ' site as Public, Quasi--Public, Institutional- . . In the event new uses are proposed, a cbWditiuriil't.use i3ermit woul&-be ; Loblerts,would have re aired 'and any so 1 and contaminant P '•! to ; .e mit g ted: r,, If these >. i. 'oblems cats be cn3 ti ac ted; 'tYie Pubffii'=Quasi- Public, ins t tuti.ona. designation would not reclude the expansion. of electrical ower . eq n on to Y t s site. Ex ans on=of electrical ower,generat�ng facilities to an= eland site shall. gave' riari't over.'ex- pans on nto a• wetlan area, prov d nc the in an expansion would be a feasible, less env ronmental_ly damaging alter- native. - - - ' t t III B. City Property wetlands. Page 131, paragraph 5 �•. The 52-acre area located between Delaware Street, and Beach Boulevard is awned by the City of Huntington Beach .arid leased to the,-Iiuntington Beach Inn and Driftwood Mobile Home, Park and .Golf Course. This area has been designated a's, .visitor-serving 'commercial/support recreation/conserva- tion to reflect existing uses and as a potential future y, 'site of a major visitor-serving commercial/recreational ,14 • development to complement the City beach. ' No height limit 11 is applied, to. this area. Prior to ermittiri an develo ment of this arcel the C ty w 11 require the submission o_f_�topo ra hic vegetation, and so 1s nformation Undent - in the extent of, an existing wetlands. A small wetland , y g area has been 12re-11minarily ma ed by the Department of i Fish and Game on Eh is pro ert The informat on shall. be re ared ual f ed ro-essional, and s all be sub ect to review by the Californ JLa De artment of rash and Game. Conaervat on easements, dedications or other similar mech- an sms shall be re uired over all wetland areas as a condi- t on ,of develo ment, to assure permanent Rrotection. Fublic ve icular traffic shall be prohibited in wetland areas _gov- erned by the conservation easement Specific Drainage and erosion control requirements shall be incorporated into the project design to ensure that wetlandtareas are not. ad- verse •a ecte No urt er su ivision of any parce s all ;r e ermine which wou lave f f the e ect o �v d ng. o env ronmenta 1 sens tivehabitatfrom of er ortions of sac i earce s for wfiTc h urban uses are permitted in the LUP. 1 ' mpw 1%Y..r..-N+e.+- ,.�.+...w.... ....�•......�,....✓..tCl.+t.lri..f..Fta y .. ,. ,. :.L:. . .:.: ... ...1...... ,. ... .,.u.........�..w-.w.o.. . ..............._.. . .•—•- t t I .t+`t " • t i . r • 4 _t • S + { i r Y � w i• tt � t ; 7 � � � � X K 1{ • r S = + 11 try S• � �' r t + f ya P t r A ` i r 4 ' yY'•ii'2 � 4 • ]. 'fi� "� } •t�'''t�i elll�•. rt+y,�,rt' ."+ �it�S,+r "1�. ,�; M1jd+SvtJ.tY 4Yt'��� z f1�j4,;ir•"'etS. i'j!,` , rk S .1 St+ t+ � � �- t: }1. + �. �^• �':d} ''���i��4 .�`. �Y?�i'�,�.< •�M1 .�.�'C;° +�� i i� i. � rx �,�.�i �F.`'`�.A" A'41, ytt }j.� .�,�"..�1'•��,�;�" y I' 3y� w.1 l 4 }t }'{ $y 1 /y� {(1 j►,1 �i 1 4 j J,� py Y� '• �. t• d �r � ,{E'ti�'c �t4r 1�f'��r� �\�\� ���`�' U. R��{ �4'�}1 �•' •� .1�.!yU rG"'`fr'R�� Y�a ti �t '�Ay�'�,4) Si •h .� �elk�.$•i �'�`„ �i T .� L •t €''C�.�r i � �'i �t 4; } r�,eY�t. �U!ati (t/ 7l r t t �,�i, ` �f,, o• S �" + !- �yS.' �j }'t9 i # .�:5�! t, :; l ,•;, +i , ' }+t Y r,#;. '+ 4 t i b• S r ii ,, S. a•#; m �'"•`fi,'.tj , )j"' ��I+. ,.x��� .{.�C �� �+z (.�t,,�, i:i'i�ra7'��. .`,`�t t�'•:�:"ir �:�C�a`..�� .e r( t, .\.: '��l�t.�,;t? • ,;"`�T�� :{t�,-{y;'�, S 5���4' �^# 3 `�yy'� •i'_t1 "W tti�t, •�;�,��z��'�}+? ',r. t���, �i.�,�t' �.. ,yr 2k Y•�,,, ��E.a.�• ! a�. tt 1: '1i ,,.� r rl�,w� � t�e ���. t �•iA:h� �5: ''t -at � u. �'��y�. � .4��� ,.a' 2:�+ � ' ,�y�tt\.� ,t, ;�+,4,r1 t 1„i�;, •�',�• r•ti1•�i '��,� .&' �t `P .�'tr�,,...'�,+.� ..,t r '��lti .;, }x •,•�7' �+, r ,� ,.�k. ''l�tq: �t� xr{.w�a'�ly,'� t 1. A� li:.p'2;• ) L� ,,: Y r"y ij :,, d`r .' .i:..v r ra... r• F} ttrq i•na` z 'eta .tt 't,"1'S�." e L. 3' yi,}�:fit M% i'r ^{`yi• � �t'4fy�� �t• ` {.t +-�,,,� � rt�1 r�_•'t ��;���i t r�tk ,�.r�`•:��i�k. a�. x+.��{ 't� ' :<�r ,�C�'"',.ty,• ,,p`' "4,�,,*y)j��" _1't,d+ +�+S.i�,�} p�7 t. a.J. '\St ;•`� E, .'ak tt;r�t'F`�r" -i'k'� .�11q `t/'} art ;ti,;x}i4iy } 't'i C r�` ,' E� .I' -CrT.iECtt:+ti4' (L 1R";,:w,dt `,•� Y '+'4y(.S ' ti (�' r tk9s1 '!�• i `i i�t,�,i}�r ��,.�� ii�`r5�•f�y'; �i` ��t' t t 1fi:l. ..��cc w( �it�.�{ yti,'r �ti7'I�,4�i�„€;t �������..�}, �a.� i `'�k,i"'.� •1 � � t '4t�' �• �yik�13 l''��'�, '1� S}it'h�, �n�� .��i,r.�� � j7 i � ����Hl...�yli)r�; ��.t �yl,�•� 1t;� �,��8i; y `y ti.> t .�,��.:�'i?��'�''�;�++�a ��t4..,w•�1,� !�!,�'s�`n:1�4L�.�rt��.c����t�c��'�t�}:�..:et��t:��'�t�,v;�r,��� III B. Buffer Requirements. Paste 144, Policy 9a - - ---- Approve ,only that•development adjacent to wetlands and, en- vironmentall sensitive habitat areas that does not as versely -impaet significantly degrade hab tat values and which is ! compatible with the continuance of the habitat. ' • Page 144, Policy 9b Reguire. new development contiguous to wetland..or. environ- R. sensitive habitat areas to include buffers. wh ch will consist of one-ar-mere-afrthe-feilawkng a minimum.of one hundred foot'= setback from the landward edge o • : the wet- and-where .possible except-along-Pac-ifse-Eeast-H+ghwaye If existing:'development�or site•confiQiiration�'pzecl ides 'a 100-foot buffer, the buffer shall be established according ct to the faors listed in Policy 9c and shall be reviewed by 'the Department of Fish and Game. In case 'of substantial development or significantly increased Human impacts, a wider buffer may be required in accordance with an' analysis of the factors in Policy 9c. - t• A-dis•aa++y-attractive-barrier-that-limits-physical-but-not vinual-aeeess- f��fference-tr-eievatiiori-se¢fteierit-to-deter-aeee!ier Page 144E Policy 9c Develop specifications for buffers araand-wetland-areas: taking into consideration the following factors: F. Biological Significance of Adjacent. Lands. - The•"bu fer should be sufficient) wide to : rotect the. functional relationship between wetland and adjacent upland. . Sensitivit :of Species . to Disturbance. The buffer-should e su£ c entl :w de 'to.•ensure ':t hat t ermost sensitive. .� species will not be disturbed s nit cantl by permrtted development, base on to itat requirements o ofTi. zest ent and m rator species and the short- and.1on -term a aptabil.ity of various species to human disturbance.. • Susce tibilit of Marcel to Erosion. Tile buffer should U-6-sufficiently wide to allow for interce tioniof an additional material eroded as a result of the proposed eve mpment based on soil and vegetative characteristics, s�o�e and runoff characteristics, and impervious surface coverage. • Use of Existing Cultural Features to Locate Buffer Zone's. Where eas b e, development should e ' ocated on t e s- e of roads, dikes, irrigation canals, flood contro c anne s, _ etc. , away rom the environmenta y sens five habitat , area. -2- M+4..*...w}.a.r..,..,, .......�..,.......... .......—. ...._.....—w.w r• ,1.... •t.4.7....t1i.. ...,. • s- .o .. ..... ..It A...a.tiL..C. ..... .«..ir ..t.�.t n.ile..n.r.w.w .• +f t r v' } 1 v �� j .1 • { Ya?' � .t IT V t t4 { � } t • a P ` }� .rot' •awl. Tr. •.It 'f:, i ts iEtr�'.'x i!.• N° $ ''A' !t d • fq, Z ?.:. .vx r yJt. �t4 , .t}}�� i• �` is 3 F �,� J. S'•k er.k'. t..•Y f` 7: (' �.1 s.•1- i .� 1 a a `e ..C). '.i !•�! r. v` /P.'rS4l, d 1 1 d,•�•, i. fir, ;•' t .�" i. t a 1,' N ." "`S..t>. t; r"X •n.ii Yt�1' ti X, ;P •. '. +, s'�1' } Y, 1 - r�� .e17't,'t•�,• �'h ;`t�fkp..yy►� ili, 1..{ ?W:_ {� a ., ,.t 'i,{�, 3 ,{ r�'tr ,g` �.ytrt ; tih� ',• r �'( °�; r�h,'. :t fat ,{ x o a!�•-� -.t c. s 47i.r':. "' tfi r!}} '.',';�� .5 } '(1:,xz�y`t1�Z ,a�,�t ; t��';i .1. ff {.�1.,)d.Sw,- 3yr„{Isys,�t 3 W.i. �1. t4: }.,t�.i•, 'tll. yr�S_ �1.t tf'r .�.'a�r� ?,�"1�. rt} i ; �Y4?. { •tiJ,� •.�i` L = r� ` P,e >r'r•7s .rcti"g'1' {j l 3{ �$! tf 3 a""17#:T «ltt�! .rY! K ? An �� }.Q .i1;• k., fir t 6 L j ! 4 z. {• . e to . = r ! 4i>*'ta� !l � �flt��t a`.t;�F'};�' �:•C� k;Yf{,t #,1 fit�. •�p '..4ttSt�ity3�1; � ..�at�g^+,R.�7¢�};l ;��i�l �,�'}�,"1.} f} t��•t :e'•i l . i•, ` +� 1i}y��.�°i t! { K.tI P,,f :( : r.•� �._# '. 4t {Fy��` } 1':,45.,i tr ttitr�(y,1 5�. . Ci 1! " �' 5 Y:S''Y•= 'W. ! i' ltrfi r t..:'1 'ajl .c►t�r.,1� L`i .§ ziY f 4S.••i� •'�.. '• b {YtP'a t i :N:r (t r tpc s' Sr 1�5 �r � � ,7'.��• ► �'S•+r. X 'i w� 3��r ,t. �i �'9],sa: r i'* �� f�xntbli.M.i' 7r R. �? i�ei°�,,h 1 jl :5`` �1��`•`!r��YX e, t. � t lf��r�''d•• d•�. � : '�'�,�, '{�7, y�t i.�.�( S /t ',�,"�+� �"•�,Cr,.,�.I.1'pv 't �� �{�t � i }� y � '� i t� �'�!'"S :rw� `a��t;'i � h �tr *.' �"'�`�t•''*'# ���i • ���i'r'�A�.l;�+t^� A''e�S'7'l�tl• tt""y � i ; � 11s�'�ASS�t��Mt4t��i��� ���tj•. � ��4 �?r� �`'�*` �,r., c: and scale of Pro osed Devclo meet• ; ti, : ii ►{ I�: �{ theast of Bolsa Chica. III CO tletland Nor • paar�g, Ara raph 5 General. Plan accurately reflects the existing The existing arts of this subsection. . uses in the developed P Owns AA vacant acres be- Metropolitan Water District iMWD) tween the Wintersburg ChannelnanPlatle bns totconstructeaHsalt- Chica bluffs and .i5 considering enerating facility water desalinization and etasns theelectrical _ex�sting designktes there. The coastal p this area low density residential/conservation. of t e�y °r two reasons• First, the environmental mpacts of the pro- this facility have not been analyzed. general plan roved amendment and various applications would have to i approved such a project could be constructed, tilde erminer full before secondly. she low environmental analysis, ose of the property, the project is not feasible; and disp fo ri- density residential/co�ervati n would b nd most �cireu- ate use, given surrounding development patterns,,-.. ticin constraints. Prior to` ermittin '.an deVlo menti this arcel }.-the'°Cit . will re wire •t}e .gubm ss on ofn the :to o- ra hic, ve etation, and`soandsin Theainfarmatnon,-shall, extent .of• an ex stir wetl and shall be:;sub act: to re Arad b ualif ed rofess onals, „ pr or review b . t a California•De artment of F sh'and G�m�• arcel, to� erma.tt n an develo men�ationsbdor others]m 1ar:•mech- conservation easements dedi an sms which allow vn1 tililu��5inuirhdioveroall 'wetland I Cal fornisa Coastal'.Act sha n wet- .� Public veh shall cxcadrainafecand erosion,'control require- areasand areas. S ecif .. into tes n to manta shall be incor r�asear�nnottadverselctaffected. ensure that wetland a III D. Wetlands: Caltranss/Mils Page 132, paragraph 8 The remaining land in this sub-area has been redesignated as follows: area between Beach boulevard and ntaingnareaseCt is relim- 1. -Thereserve and co currently in planning inaril deal bated as rwiev aThisbs in calso at-ih— and Game. The-+oeatto to term nus of the major access route froeciallydapPropriate the beach. These factors make it esP prior to for, visitor-seXvingvmecl tcosssrteti nnt on iat1s ec E e i=r? armIttini any develo t w 11 be r-e uired foarcal5 in arsn le ownersie1 wrichn- ti uous series of nclude the followin elements: -3•- i. w 1 t r .. .,+ µ•a d's1 y y� { zw �� Fit7`'�.Z� f'`.�. '��.'f•F3,�• d�•1: �'�t} '�:�+-, ��" N 1 }°' �i}y y t�F1, f,� 'f�r V". t��� `sr p n 1 �� �';,� � 't.1.1 'h,t�r i� 1 �v �� �'; ',a4 � ,�,i �� .a7-����!, � '� �t •; E�;� �, � j ��4• { � ����". �'� � ..v!w ; i?,�f ;` 1st �53�:� « s;{ �. ;�>j, .�t .� � C� 't?. •��• � '�' ,+ �" �� :�' 7 1l � �� ' `�,.a.��4, {. '!,•,�,.� ti.,1 y � ,. ��3 } *�,1;X;� t,rst. ��.��_ i � _+.t +,+;, k.#�ar. } ,y���s •� ,,}}�, 'i�'r�p .� _ i-�Y t "?� ,.' +:�..'� .,+y 4�Y5t, s"t..iY 'SsY'� ���1:�"��.t'.�+� ai X,.'. �i",�$yvS� i� ^�?�. ';�`��y`t. t -'t r,� ��1�?;N..•� {,t� �y��Y is t ��Ae.,,y, ':y +n.s�.y�.v'.�w !. .,� t ����.1, �,�� '�r�r, �,�,. �..y_•. �1�ik?�:;, ,y+�r� �-1?'�i.F t, �,�yjv. }� ,��y ! •,f:r�i�t!:�,sy,•,� ,� �Y +;� .K q��'tx"v��ti�� , s, /: '. *� 'll• , S ,� �1 , 1 A r �9� "i �r�: �7�„ . " '. r �• } a'- . 1 '� �3? • • �p ��, � � 4 y. tf}`�.��� r i.Fry YSIc"�i��'. �;'��;�{"E. �f � t•3 Sr� S�'.bi'1.St;• Fi ''�, ��� ror� jt 1 .\X �''r* x�r r4,,i as �rf y L } ��'} ..}- t 1 .� � •� �i � �. f.t�. t {• +� t;{, i,EiS ��, t.. , r� •a •Q, .tam°ti Y+ t. �} ,• �. �, t!r t'�{>f;, ,rt. �� s .t•. ?4yy{3'� •41Lr 1'.� .41f 3y��y,F �+,ti �.::� i rY 'py Y ,' Y r k R Rj 'b.�.: .�t1�. t,- r �'Y,t_ � �7� �.� ► ry f, ti x, ����,, tt2�t a ' �',�. # ; tl' 1) Mapping of the specific plan area on a scale.°detailed enough to differentiate all upland and wetland areas shall be required,_ and shall be approved by the Calif- ornia Department ofish an Fd Game. 2) upland areas may be "consolidated" so that an area dal to' the sum of all upland areas may be used for • dev�� opment. ' 3) Permanent conservation easements shall be required over three acres for eaci acre o�develo moment. d An enhancement program,_approved b ty h men Departt,;;;.,.. of: Fish and Came, for the area within_—the ronservation easement, including restoration of any remainin 'undev- 'eloped upland areas, shall b -- - ed. The enhance:-- Ment: program may be phased over time,. it must be economically feasible, and shall not jeopardize public ea 1th,—saaT6-F , or wel are.- 5) All other policies,. includinr those related to `buffers, r shall a complied wa.tfi prior I i.tt�.nq�ev.Top� men t, III E. Road Extension Page 98, blap: Add Footnote: 1lamilton 'Avenue she i 'not' be"located''witliin:`any wetland area: as defined by the Coastal Act. Hams ton Avenue may bridge any wetland area; however, fill sha 1 not be 2laZied n ar�,:wetland area for the purposes of construct on, ex- anslon, or real gnment. On Divider before Page 57 Add to definition of "fill": "including pilings placed for the purpose of erscting structures thereon. III F, Properties Northeast of Dolsa Chica, Eucalyptus Grove. Doge 121, paragraph 1 2. A 10.5 acre area between the proposed Bolsa Chica Street extension and the bottom of the mesa bluff is now planned low density residential. This bluff area con- tains a significant stand of mature eucalyptus trees and affords a view into the 1361sa Chica toward the ocean. To protect these bluffs %and to allow public access to, and use of, this scenic area, it has been redesignated recreation. While the property could support either passive or active recreational uses without jeopard- izing scenic amenities, a major recreation facility would not be compatible with the sensitive .nature of the -4- 5 Z e � r � � .4 �l bluff and would not be allowed. The recreation desig- nation is also compatible with existing stables,,located directly, south in. the County's jurisdi.ction.4,;,Tha United States Fish and Wildlife Service recomr�`-'rends ro- tectxn , the aucalyphus grove as an onvironmental° ,sansi- tive habitat; therefore, all Holicies, w c ertain� to such hab tat are buffers an erosion-and drainage controls. OnIx uses•..that will--not • impair- t e resource shall be allowed in the eucaly tus grove. III If. Wetlands South of Brookhurst. Page 115, paragraph 2 r: liid(ii3trial ,Enerqy Production 6nservation. •The intent :of this , Land use designation is to protect a unique ,6nviron mentally sensitive area without precluding expansion""apt i uns for,.energy production. Allk.uses are roaditiorial-.atid�l�limited to-'thlbse addressed' in Coastal�"�Act Pol1c es,.30233 ,an 0264 , Such; uses• incltide energy and coastal-de a ent znrustrial ac �l"e.tles, :mineral. extraction ` a uacultrare, or °sum' ar re- y; source deRendent act vit es: Any development 1 t is'district wh ch is proposed for-- wetland areas. shall be sub eet to Coastal' Act PolicY , 30233 which is Ado fed U reference in Policy Sf (see page 143) . f Al Page 1.33, earagra� 1-33 2. Most of the. natural areas between Newland Street--Oreek- httrst-Street; and the Santa Ana .River which are .currently in plaitriin�j, reserve ,in the General Plan' have Been desig- nated indu.4-rial#energy production/conservation:r,; Prefer- ertce_�fo'r, new- le_yelopis ent�-shall be yin, areas con a_ Uous to`c xi sting development:. power plant- expansion' in tUjL area, shall ba 'located northwest of Magnolia Street and shall be inconformance with: Saction 30250 of the Coastal Act. -ar Fite-area-beEtreert- B @t��tHtti9�-6tt*eet�-attel-tit@^fi8te d-Attu RiverT-•eu rrent4y-desigtiated-'planning-reserve7-will•-eventu- a�lY-aece�nmeddte-a-stegtteg..are�t-fet*-kite-Sat4ta-RHa-River blke-trnll-ag-xel•1-aa-ce-teeN-allgrenertt-fer-t}te-Talbeft €lead-eetstrtil-eHa:creel-+{Hert-the-Cerps^e�-Sng#t�eere-ee►�plekEg ,..�. tsw lt�a�#-ee�ntral-pre eet-fer-the-Santa-Ana-hlverv--tFhe- land -use--plan^applxea-fs-rrisltar-sera�lttg-eernrY►e�e#al--rtse- ;`; ltare-to-aeearmadate-onelllary-•serviees-for-these-ective ', rect-eeetianttl-parsazta.---t�tttarnl-aracty-whic}t-nay-kea-dealg- •: paced-aetlartd-xrll-be-prataekcd^and--rrat+at*ed-test-#:en:tible. 1 if -fir 3. The vacant strip between the power pl-int and Pacific Coast highway in currently ,included under the Public, Quasi--Public designation. Presently, the only use on this a" + site is beach-related parking during the summer. Tt has + '; been redesignated to recreation to accommodate a recrea- tion vehicle campsite, travel trailer, park, or other such recreational use. • y. let ,. _ ........-, .»........._..._... .,....� ... .... w w ,...:ti`_,.. . i .... . ........ ;n,,, .•. -..ter.,..n ,.._...,.w_...,....,,. _. - _.»r,......r.s•a.a'rtyr- `v>., 'r 1 n 7� I C f Iv. itousing ! ,� Page 03 after fits-► Paragraph The City of Huntington Beach is concerned about preserving its existing affordable housing units, as well as increasing the supply. of, such units. Evidence of this concern is the fact that the City., has developed a Housing Element which has been approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development and has begun work 'on the implementation phase of this element. Using the guidance afforded .by this element, the City has met..its regional "quota" for affordable housing as defined by the Southern California Association of Governments in 1980. This element 'is Incorporated into the Coastal Plan. In the coastal zone the City has gone .beyond the Housing Element by. In6luding -.additional policies regarding .the preservation and enhancement of affordable housing opportunities. Much of the affordable housing in the coastal zone eonsists" of mobile .homes, The City'has a policy aimed at the preservation the existing mobile bdmes;. the City also has recently enacted a moratorium on mobile home park conversions until the problems involved in such conversions are addressed. Resides mobile homes, another source of affordable .housirig 'ih the coastal zone are small-scale apartment buildings., •To peotect. this , . ..source of-.affordable housing, the City has incorporated a policy Into the.Coastal Plan to prohibit conversion of' rental units' to condomi- niums if such eonElersion reduces the afforable ,housitig stock. Also, 1n lrhe Cldtcwn area of the coastal zone, the city prohibits the constructionof condominiums on small lots, and many of the small unit rental buil.dfncls in this area .are on-small lots. If the existing , buildings "recycle", they will likely be replaced with new rental t "uni`ts, because constructing condominiums is prohibited, + the 'City"s. Coastal Plan 'also included policies to develop i.nce'ntive.s for lot consolidation and for larger rgsidrntial 'projects. The City ' willappl.y an "inclusionary" zoning requirement to 'such projects. The .City„expects that this will not only J.ncrease the number, of affordable units, but 'will intprove the quality of the afforable housing stock. In light of this, the Gity feels .it is more productive, as well as more efficient, to focus on encouraging new affordable housing units through density bonuses and inclusionary zoning than to rely on `replacement strategies. Through all of these approaches, the City hasp developed a comprehensive strategy for nrotect.ing and enhancing affordable housing opportunities in the coastal zone. . _ .......^_ .....+..�vt.s'i'„r'.1'.F...•... ♦el;... .. ..1:,•..Y ,..a:a�i liifro.r L:.:%��t"1' .*+;:1'�M}.'.`.+..i'.'isIS.lY.ii,�F..M1+.-w.w.1^..rv...y.ar7x7vew��1C�_ �t . 1. + .. ', ,- .- ,r,•-(iy 1 Pale 151�, Policy 15c ee"erdinate In coordination with the Orange County !lousing Authority and local housing proponents (builders, real estate board members, lenders, consumers) to develop provide for continued Ion -term affordability for all low and moderate income units resu" ting from inclusionary and .and policies. Add Policy 15q Kermit condominiuM stock coopeicative ccaw=sinlls ani-y-when. they would not result in -a Let loss of affordable housing opportunities. V. Access Page 139, Policy 4a Require an offer for dedication of an easement in-all new development to allow vertical access to the shorelir c` or to public recreation areas or to public trails and bike- ways unless: . Adequate ac&ers exists nearby or. is proposed by" the an use plan within a-reasonable-distenee 1,000 feet; or Access'•at the Site would reare� t-�n-edt+e�ee--�n+paets-an � s'14nificahtly degrade environmental sensitive habitat ` areas de;xgrrated-�onaerant�en�-by-t e-land--sae-pler:; —or _ Findings_ are made, consistent with Section 30212 'of the 'Coastal Act, that access is inconsistent with, publ•ic safety, military security needs, or that agriculture would be adversely affected; or The paicel is too. narrow for an adequate privacy buffer separating the accessway from the ,an existing_' private residenc' L. : Ttie following ui.deline shall be used in date?rmini"Ii 'adequate-,.privacy" buffers for existing resx ent al develop- ment: There must be at least 15 feet between an exiatin resi_ ffe—nE—eand the sx a and prol2erty line in order to accommo- date both accessway and—privacy and-privacy butfer. Require an offer for dedication of an easement in all new aevelopment7 too allowlaeral access al ong the shoreline unless: . Access at the site would signif.icantlY degrade environ- mentally senuitive habitat areas, or Findings are made, consistent with Section 30212 of the Coastal Act, that access is inconsistent w1th public -6-- .4t1�`1.•.1'f iai'i.4.,a.s.irrr.--.-....-. .._ ...,....-.._ ..w^.r..lr•Y.\,:lit'"..r a......r... , ..._ ... .. HIMS MI . ' .. •.. :yt.l'....µ•,i.i.vl l J. f,.,,i C. .:'L.:«.:rtv`i1. �{.i�'�{':1,fa....«w•..�....�.«_..•�+•'��w+.•i+•+MVYMwl1�/'ty?,� t, A 1' a safety, military sr_curity needs, or that agriculture would be adversely affected; or The parcel is too ' narrow for an ade jua to privacy, buffer. separating the accesswayform an existing private residence. The following _guideline shall be used in determinin age- , quate privacy buffers for existing residential development: . There must be at least 20 feet between in axis ting ,re' si- dence, patio cover, or pool and the shoreline in order to accommodate both accessway and privacy buffer. Page 139, Policy 42 Preserve- arid, where possible, provide additional public access to the Htintinhton-Harbour-waterways shoreline; assemble for public information the full legal documentation to identify the public rights-or-way, ownership, and other agreements concerning ` the Ilun tincjton Ilarbour channels including appli- cable homeowners association deed restrictions. Page 139, Add Policy 4i nny offers of dedication `of accossways not accepted'' by .the CitY •may_be accepted by any 'public agencies. ,Private asso- cintions ma ."accept such dedic��tions .if the can prove to the. Cit 's satisfaction that the association has the finan- cial and administrative cabilities to ma nta n such accessways and to accept full liability for them. V C. Countess Drive Site Page •119, paragraph 2 'The principal vacant property in this area is a 17-acre t elementary school/neighborhood park site owned by the ocean View School District and the City of Ilunti•ngton Beach. I Currently. the District does not have plans for the, site. '. if the site is sold, the ].and use .pl,-in designations would allow it to be developed to low density residential in keeping with the surrounding uses. Remaining vacant lots in resi- dential areas are also designated the same density as ad � - ant uses. Development on vacant lots fronting on waterways 3 will be subject to the access policies contained in this element. Another important vacant ti:ruperty is the five-acre site at • the terminus of Countess Drive.'Phis arcel had been des - nated by the Coastal Commis on as a vis tar-servin commer-• cial , site as a permit condition of ad acent residential , development. The C t ► . finds that a medium density residen- !' tial. desi nation is more a rho riate for this s te. However, El- or to permuting residentla1_ development the Citz will require offers of dedic rion or granting of public access- ways and open space recreationtion area; on all perimeter -7- 8.':.i�4.n+^••'w...w..ww........•+..w.�..+r+.........T...v....v..wv.F.I vy_....s.w y OLU WAR '�1„' ...,t::.,':_vl.::,isl...•ryt•,Ma. .rr. .... .•.�vr«w v...w........w..v.,.._..r+.r ..o*—w•..w'a.n'w+w.T.rt.4w�rti.lEly4}( Jr I L y r k t 't MA � ,�.:�a*`i f� �"� t + ,y,� 4 v''/ 1 � l � �` si C. .'t , �,tt it � •' •" + � ij r �'rl.. � F. '�j Z, +� A C ,t` �� , ���'N� I i. 1 .�r �tY'�.'"� !!'` i` '>k �'1�� j .•a � 'y.°.,r ,r � t°�y+ J�j► �ts�1 ! y; 1� ''F.`1.�1, 1. �,1 � �Yl� �,�( .}jf}'i..j� �i + ,g • • - • • • • t l ti r r S'. 3 ii 4� +I 1 ,h +27 Rl` R RVV. i 4 vyi wr• 4?t �7+ 7S S{ ,t { )/ .# \ \ y 1 �7i .+ t��:'! h"Y'+t.., .C: 5'�i 11� 4 t r 4� y ' s,k' t.l«'�1 •.-i � �F. ,r � t', r •.N i rs {, F i � t! s ,ti '�` '�'• e } C .j. ' t � s`'y,a �' •S')"r ' ����"�,tl t��� � ����� t"his�!'�,��`• �,,�y,Sj�" ��-'��1si.����4+���•1+.�TG�� t�' �' �'t `•� ''�� , ,`` '�st "��+�y���K�r�+ti`� � 4. �"'{ �y�"'1��!'t ��' �l� `���� .r i �� ` tr.)1 � � ;t p�y,�y a 4 � E�� , .�S� ')t�� 9 . 'f � �.r5►5� '1 1`.il �3 . , • `�Y , lilt- hilO'l MR R IN !e 1 � '�.i+�j` � � � � j 7 ;1 -j � !•. �III� `� ��# �� r, ..1t.�1 .�1 .Yt ,�� t 1 �.ti+c► .�..�y.: r.` AF i\ :s '.L. s'.a�, a!a:t Gr#l.t.� a ts' t R! '!`� ►! _.f' . rL7�it.l t, +-r{ a A }. t� E•I s E 1 / 1 y 1 1 1 1 : . 1 4�• • • Z L . / i • 1 !1 I i I I 1 4 r • • 1 1 + l 1 1 1 • 1 r I . . .�7' A • , 1 / � I r + + 1 I C 1 I I I / z / 1 • L 111 A 1 1 • 7 1 1 1 • / 1 a a :7 ,r i• kJ r+ +a !b }�}1 1 t �s t t�l b 1� 1 y t I y�• y •�� 'tl�'\���„t�A���:,i���}1,��V,5T'��•��tS4Y•f,�*�1,ytr•����/,,��+�� �jc�� •°'�y.,�t�1�� t ��V 1� 1?��"1_7�•kYtt'.+��i.1'° f' � t:�tiT;`1'•�y�"+r�` '1��1: it}�! ��;��.t7� s ���'(;��1 r * }���L, si �, ���,t. ; LUa>l �+• a +'2 r'.`t�,•"� '1 � t�'.y� yT,jtj�ylf�1`ri•t1;j�j��J1}"+ ?iL '�f.�i•� +'+Nr '•r �N �S ! t1 �tU R }'Jftt !� FF� , F.I Y• ! vC f tj'^ V 1 rr � +., ii ���''Rg! �} �!��K� .. . 5 � �,�i� 1 _ 'l,• �' T jt ! } .r ;. ,� � i s,�� tr�r �. 1.a�, l`•, ,�,�.1.�i'��s �a t/ ;y��y`� �{�'�S��1•�^S�}• �'. ! ' �� � �{J{�;� � l '�;t� ��V' "1�Y ��i K+'1 ;�t � t1 e�s!'i Prt) ! ,�,A�1.;�t�.1��`,1+y'h+.t �r 1 ' .�11TF' � '•'{�^. 1� .�lT�` �'� i++;Y �h''��1 ��4 "'1li � � Y.*• :�, ,Y+ l+r. .�r�1 r ` �' °t' �.y]'4) t t't1�'1; '! jr t,' �r�5���1 ��.� . +•R1 • �. � �S loll � 1, 1 ��.s; .�. •1 1 � 1 � � n�� •h h� �y� 1L". 'LF'+�, `A `e .t .�• {tt { t •q��' ' i. • � �V� r'� �Y. '.�t't. _ ... � V''.`! 4 �t + �� •�� '.ti � �✓ t VU IA • ttjt � ,t 1 ` �` �1 + � \.�� } e �{.• � � I 'Irk .� � "ti 1 1'�t ► kip V.: . �a� -��� , ;�iS,, ��,� 1 ;�' ► S7. r I�� � �•�► �� .� �� �� � 1 ...� i tji� ,� 1.• •� �� 51' �� fit-• � � ,� �� � � Ar � �� 1 4�1 � �'t � �, �V+ ti�' `I I}l�i J �j C�' .� 1\'� �'}; 1•+ � ����"+��' i•t r''� �`�f+ ti ! t ���7AP�� . �•� ti'' ' 4 h��• + i (, 1,�)'t: �s rt •, .�. fir. .c �, ` d ll� rl'r . S MOW 1 i t Y 1 L J`�\"N. 1 to yyld{ E•.t f K��'` .S;Yr flf•1' ,i r vp 1•7r yu ti' tJ !Jit+i'i C' p �f „1+..y.i.p ; �• XII J ••r*any.^. rti 7, ,_., � mod• ► • ,w}l�r,�t n�y(�.t".`^�'', irk '}Y•��{r��Lip �>} SR gt,.vi . ♦2 t��{� �,ryt r w: rd4a:4C;a� r , �rl�'.J,v r. 1• +� k, • Y?fit ' � ►IVIN ti t )�,• i1 ,.., , w•4,�+4s ib•d{�' ►�t'�yt',s 1}'� + •,�, '� 1 �d .t �1j �l `f. r Y«. 11 ''� fi �t'`' �• t {I Y�,1"• t � � 1 . �1� 1,+ `� ���.,.�• tiP'Y'2y�, y� •4f'�' }' s '�! t''V1tti"!27�' 1 ' \, f,+ R1 ,1•,S5`4� t i `,4,� y�+�4���� ��1}';`r ri� �{�� , .�iF^� �'1�,lt",1 ,� +i��� '�� Y� �i�,�j'��•�Jy 7�� '4+� s•���.�, � �`•'"r�,�!1��it y=a�r. �}n� } ,�r l' � �� .7 a� .♦ < 1,�+, � wi� .1 .`'^'jt 1,� �: � 'S' ��'1.c '{�. 4 '.+w �y 1 7a. � �' :�:4 '►t'" �; �YS' �` t v +� l lr,� o- � � a . �{a�. , � •vw t. � .,,, �•:� {r. ! �� ,•���'� � . Z l c .� xl lT• fit" tt `�' �� �r,. � '�;�. "�•i l�, l��( '��� C .,t'J,t.�{��aP� � � ��• f��+. ,t wM 1 '�Lfa�r",t, 1' r �♦ �♦� rf5�'� �� M•�'�I�1 t � (�`•rt^�,b.� (��i. 1Y � .���� . � ,� .f�,+ w��� +TJ, ;��• .�a n. l,�yl�►lr��`. �♦ �Z i`. 1,• '�� r 'd7� 'i 7 �,� ' �r�1,' al 4 � r i rl 'i �.. •t�, ;'�� '`t '\ 1 '�Z I, �L V .,�L ",��� r y�+ {�. 1.�'�. � jY�•r ��7 �, �" �t •'�'.�� " 1 �r�,�rt`1'�� �! .�..� +�� . �` pply; '�• ;� '`�, '�' � '����, �� �t• t''� �`` :��'� 1'� ��;tl� \. � Ra°lit �'Stt� � ��� � ` �v�kl s: i���* wS, k. i��1'f^k -'�.•�l 3,+,2 0,1T5 1„�'�`��Y 'tr � #F~ � �'}.i t �� ''iy'*�yt,�r 1Sry�'i 'Y ylri� �. S��' Y4, t .♦ � ►�r � rw ► �� f1. {,4.1t.. .t i r^` �� ♦ •Jt. .� � `{r��.�.1x ��� �,��' N�, �� 1 +� ��1' '��: ,',�`� •�, f y 4.�7 'ia � 3 'R' i �_ i1k'4 �r .� Ir :� yRI�1 .1 y a i t7e.,��•y'k, •i�,)1+,,••� J►C' t:}. e 4 7lie v'1 lr1 F^ 1 � • 4.r i ' J � ` wi. t 4 + ?�y] } t ` . �• ,�Lti _ ._ _ w Ear.. - - I;It Tv 'IT,mkp- t"N 5 J 4 s It, A, . I— t 0.- V-�:, taq 0 " m-0. F ZT� " kv "Ci Z,l It 6L • ... ....... AP YVI�l -NIV RIM", Air�Z,,MM N 4111:1 ZTAI - Rj • V ah ;L, RIO a I Will'; RCA - GRANT FUIv G June 23, 1981 Page 2 The attached work program and budget outline the projected costs of the certification process. FUNDING SOURCE: The amount of the grant will be reimbursed by the Coastal Commission upon completion of the work program. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Do not apply for the $20,000 in Phase II grant funds from the Coastal Commission to complete the certification process for the Coastal Element. The City would then absorb any costs associated with plan certification itself, or rely solely on the possibility of 'obtaining SH 90 funding for reimbursement for such costs. f �� iG.+'�i" Y�+� 7N�� ��1�� � t *� .J r�� +•;a•+�v s��� '�..'����i T'.. ,�,�„„pr,,�,.""°'4 `N�'?iRi. Nark Program City of Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program Phase 11: Certification i 7' t° r� l.v ApMINISTRATION Discussion: Administration is an ongoing function which is an .integral part of any project. Administrative responsibilities include: 1) Grant management. 2) budget su ervision, 3) coordination of planning'activities, 4) scheduling and coordinating staff and 5) staff supervision and review. Effective, administration is essential to achieving the goals of the coastal program. Objectives: t , I Ensure the efficient administration of the budget, staff And tasks during the grant period. Ensure adequate input from other departments, agencies and the public. Ensure effective communication with other departments and City officials. Tasks: (a) Coordinate planning activities. (b) Menage the budget. (c) Schedule and coordinate staff and tasks. (d) Supervise staff and revlew products. ;I !R (e) Coordinate with finance, administration and legal departments. (f) Dissemim to information to planning staff and other departments. (gj Perform tasks related to revising the Coastal Element as requested by City officials. Products: Quarterly progress reports on the status of the grant tasks. Cos t: M Iff ML Asst.'Planner 550/wk 4 As $2,200 A I I Spa;µ P +.. kna i,ai e:l.;y'cai y�%rr,r• . 1 � { t r I' i 2.0 REVISIONS TO COASTAL ELEMENT Discussion: . Most of the rvrk necessary to achieve certification of the .` City's L&ad ,Use Plan by the Coastal Commission involves changes to the plan itself., In order to draft 'these changes. City LCP staff must work closely with Coastal Connfssfon staff to identify and resolve the pertinent issues. Draft changes must be prepared for presentation to the City.Council at a public hearing. In some cases. several Iterations of this process may occur before the final adoption of the changes. It is anticipated that these steps will take place over d period of several months. It is important that at least one coastal planner be available on an ongoing basis. to provide continuity in handling the revisions, study sessions and hearings. Ob ectives: -• To ensure that rt- i5lons are made to the Land Use Plan which will enable the Coastal Commission to find it in conformance with the'Coastal Act. ; Tasks: j (a) Coordinate with Coastal Commission Staff. , (b) Develop language for the Land Use Plan in conformance with coastal act policies. (c) Prepare text changes. I' i E ' Gi= ,�'6 ' ��{yy{yyy,i�.''y� /p��•/f�tS � j� }µy'�''�p' �yy y�y�y3w s �5�7•,T4wrtrrnA'w.�i+wEreM{7� el�i .�M.aMY.�•+Tt'tv' � %W��1MwiTln�4Y��YN��'.•Ye �S���•!4�d"5�1'.-}.^L9:!'1.^'71'S".C6Jli`a,Aer.ww rulewa-wfww.wu��r.....�..�.:..., . f i (d) Prepare for and supervise presentations to the City Council. (e) Make necessary revisions as indicated by the Council to the final document. Products: Text of changes to the Coastal Element. Cost: . Asst. Planner 550/Nk 18 As $9.900 t , i 1 i • ,I I �- I i .. 3.0 HEARINGS Discussion: Proposed changes to the Coastal Element are changes to the General Plan and must be handled in a manner. similar..to General Plan amendments. This means that 'a:public hearing must be held by the City Council and testimony taken from interested persons. The public hearing must have public notice advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. Staff members. who prepared the language must attenc; the public hearings in case their input is needed. Often the initial hearing is continued to other meetings and staff is directed to develop and analyze additional information before the City Council makes its decision. After adoption by the City Councils the changes will be presented to the Coastal Commission at a. public hearing. This hearing will be attended by the appropriate staff members.who will present the City's analysis to the Coastal Commission and be available to answer their questions. The hearing my be completed at one meeting, or may be continued to another time. City staff must be available at any meetings until the Coastal Commission makes its decision. If the Land Use Plan is denied by the Commission, it may be necessary for staff to draft more changes, and the entire hearing process will Ne repeated. Ob ectives: To ensure that changes to the Coastal Element are adopted after public notice and hearing. 1 Tia 1 - To present adopted 'changes in the Land Use Plan to the Coastal Commission. Tasks: (a) Advertise in, a newspaper of general circulation the date, time, place and content of proposed changes in the coastal element. (b) Distribute written materials, graph:, displays and any other necessary infcrrtation to the City Council prior to the public hearing. (c) Attend public hearings to present and analyze proposed changes. (d) Prepare and forward text of adopted changes to the Coastal Commission. (e) Attend Coastal Comnissfon.hearings to present adopted changes and respond to .Commission. Products: i. Text of adopted changes to the Coastal Element, Revised Land Use Plan for submittal to the Coastal Commission Cost: Asst. Planner $550/wk I Wk 550 Asso. Planner $585/wk I wk 585 Dept. Direct. of Planning $750/wk I irk 750 I ~ I III r F S. • i t 4.0 PUBLIC INTERACTION Discussion: Preparation and adoption of the Coastal Element has F: generated a great deal of citizen interest in the coastal zone of."the City. public anticipation of the . �rospect that the dty will soon have a certified Local r; oastal Program.with full..imple'menting ordinances is a strong motivation for development interests to investigate f possible projects in the area. Also, other residents and visitors of the coastal zone are interested in the LUP and modifications to it. As a result, staff receives � several telephone calls daily from people who want in- formation about the kinds of developments which will be r possible. It is in the best interests of the City to encourage communication with property owners, prospective developers and the general public, in order to foster the successful implementation of t.w plans and policies con- tained in the Coastal Element, and, at the same time ; facilitate the entitlement process for the public so as ; I to keep projects economically viable. It is anticipated that these public interactions will increase as planning for the coastal zone progresses. Since public support is an important ingredient in the success of any plan, this ' ) public interaction is seen as a necessary and deseriable function of the certification process. Ob ectives: To keep the channels of communication open between } interested citizens and the City. To disseminate infonnation to the public about the y a: Land Use Plan. To increase support for coastal planning. TasFs; (a) Answer telephone inquiries from the public. (b) Disseminate staff reports and analyses when requested. {c) Provide a means of obtaining public input or, the Land Use Plan. Cost: .. Asst. Planner a550fwk 8 Hks $4,400 • .t I i SLOWRY OF PLANNING STAFF TIME FOR PHASE II CERTIFICATION d TASKS STAFF TIME COST S 100 Administration 4 wks $2,200 ! 2.0 Revisions to Coastal Element 18 wks $9,900 3.0 Hearings 3 wks $1,885 4.0 Public 'Interaction 8 wks $4,400 '3 i t . t - 4 Y� r' it-. 1 ESTIMATED BUDGET FOR PHASE II CERTIFICATION :j Salaries (includes benefits) $18,385 E Operating Expenses S 1,615 Travel $415 ; Supplies 50 I .. Printing 650 Advertising 500 :1 Total $[O,OOQ f 4 r If i ' I j " I k 1 i ,t . Ci` ' t EQUtjS a 'IL ACTION --r ate dune 18, 1981 CITY cis Submitted to: honorable M r an j ty Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato4 , Propared by: Department of Development Services Subject: Coastal Energy impact Program Grant Application Statement of Inue, Recammen&tion,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attad'imwrts: q(:� STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The City has recently been working on three. projects . relat:ed to energy facilities: participation in offshore Lease-Sale #69 review, .implelaentation of landscaping .requirements in Oil Code, and ' ''' I'ng * the 'bluff area along the beach in-the .Townlet..'- The State Coastal Commission has tentatively approved $8, 357 to the City -for continuation of these projects. RECOMMENDATION: } Authorize the application to t;ie State Coastal Commission for a { coastal energy impact program grant in the amount of $8,,357 in order to continue three important projects involving mitigation 'of.impactrs £rcct energy-production facilities. The City will make an in-kind contribution of 20% of the total. 'ANALYSIS: The City has been especially active in the mitigation of alveree impacts from oil and energy production facilities during the last two years. Significant success has been achieved in this regard, notably the updating of the City' s coil Code. There are three on- going projects which the City will continue to work on during the next year related to energy production: continued participation in the environmental review of offshore Lease—Sale 068 scheduled for 1982, the implementation of the new landisc:aping requirements in the revised oil code, and continued work with Aminoil and �. Chevron to make improvements to the bluff area between 9th and t Goldenwest Streets. i 1 3 Ji 1 I np Q81 n Page 2 This Coastal Commiission grant would provide funding for. these three projects. The City, will very likely undertake these programs regazd3css of State funding; for example,. it is in the City's interest and a normal staff function to evaluate environmental impact reports for offshore programs near Huntington Beach. This grant will. help defray City costs to continue these projects. FUNDING SOURCE: State Coastal Commission. ALTERNATIVES tio' grant application: By not applying for this grant the City will either discontinue these projects or absorb the cost itself. CWT:LIWP:MM:jj/h/ I I I i , t • ' COASTAL ENERGY IMPACT PRO/7"M APPLICATION COVER SHEET flame of Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Pro.Jecy pirector: James 1.1. Palin Title: Mrector Grant Officer: Michael Multari Title: Associate Planner Project Manager: Michael MulLari Title: Associate Planner Railing Address: P#0, BOX 190 Phone: 714-536-,5271 Huntington Deacit, Ca. 92646 Project Title: OCS planning and ordinance implementation Expected Project Start Date: July 1981 Months Required to Complete: 10 1. Total Cost of Program: 5 10.828 2. Local Share: COASTAL COMI'tS•IQtl USE ON).Y (if applicable) S 1, 671 Gate Received: 3. Other Funds: S — Assigned To: 4. CEIP Grant Requested S 8, 357 1 Please check attachments: i EXIIiBIT II Resolution Authorizing Submittal for CEIP Assistance Q EXHIBIT III Completed State and Regional Clearinghouse A-95 Review EXN•IMT IV Fi•oject Narrative j T A EXHIBIT V 1.46rk Program ;SSF. ATTACHMENT £XH161T VI Work Program Schedule EXHIBIT V1I Product Description and Schedule EXHIBIT V11I Staff Assigned to Project EXHIBIT IX, Proposed Budget Submit .three (3) copies of completed application to: California •Coastal- Commission, 631 Howard Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Authorized Official Signatur Date James h. Palin ` rj �l f i tle Director, heveloprr t o vices I1 EXHIBIT I }} f Yl']A klh:tTn!:if:r.. .,.S.i..::iL']t lfii'r11•.'t ::"5.++•J"R+w+.xM:l4't sw'Ir1bf Os+I]iia Lt,lt 4aMti..•w+.`w+n :.7 ty/: aa'• .. .ram..._. ...ty t rA M I' r� 1 b•. �; uR (t ,( + {+lam. !:4 3 II ; ♦'F `,�" �' •'$. , � -� R . 'T1 ^d.4� Y'�� 't'�. �, ', c+i •�'� •r Y E� l'. sty: �`'��,� ' `�,a �i,SN��q'+•iYf 4'�2� � •T r COASTAL ENERGY IMPACT PRUGRAM City of Huntington Beach PROJECT NARRA f IVE ' if this application is ni cceszful, this would be the third CEIP grant awarded to the City of Huntington Bench. The first allowed the City to prepare the hacks#ound information necessary to develop energy pnlicies for its Local Coastal Plan. The second rind principal grant hon ennbled the City to develop new orditk-inces and to instigate other projects which will help implement the LCP energy policies. The grant the (City is applying for now is designed to continue these projects and to go beyond the zoning ordinances toward actual Implementation of the LCP. It in a logical continuation of the previous grants. The following would be the principal tasks; 1) OCS'Lense Sale #60 DoctimciA l Revi� ew and Hearinq Participotia.q Onshore impacts from now UC;S and 'iidelands Platforms. The City's LCP policies cnll for Ulmer monitoring of cnergy-rclated davolopinents In ' the coastal zone rind increased participation in energy impnct plrinning. The City porticlpnted in the "scaping tneetings" for. OCS Lenso-sale #60. This lease-solo will likely include tracts offshore from Huntington Beach In Ahe San Pedro day and i further offshore lensing nenr Flurttington Bench is likely. The Graft EnvironrnentnI impact Statement (i:IS) is expected In May and hearings will be conducted during the summer. The rinnl i s is exprcted In November, 1901, Huntirigtnn 13606ii has been . analyzed in previeui lease-nabs for onshore support facilities including"support bases, reparation plants, storage facilities, marine terminals, and pipeline landfalls. The City will participate in the hearings procerz. atxJ will analyze the poss16111hy of t now or expanded onshore facilities in Huntington Beach and their potential imf.•acts I. on the community. i E Tho City has nlso' been *monitoring offshore activities within the throe-mile limit. eminent USA has initiated a pilot program far steam injection from rn nxisting Tidelovid platform. if sucressfui, anew pint forsn..,appruxiinali ly 1.5 miles offshore from tt- City secrns likely. In nnticipatian of this, Arninoll fans begun preparing applications for test driliitua in order to find the best, locatiesi fnr the now facility, If I, necessary. Coil recovered here would be landed and treated in Huntington Beach. it i The City will monitor development in this area, and determiixz the kinds of facilities that tnny be neadad such as new pipeline landfalls and expannirni of rnshore treatment tend storage facilities. The City will also review asul r_emment an the cnviranrnental documentaton p for tho tent drillin and latforries. prepared 9 Objectives; inrre±nne loc-nl participation In energy pinnsting. Assess impacts from any new rr expanded anshore f.+eilitien on Huntington Ucach resulting from now UCS or Tidelands operations. t�iS`�'r"'- .ura...m..v.....•....-...s......,.,..,<..„.ti.,.o.~+.•.n..........•,..r,.....-».,.+..w+..wu...++.w.+»,...tec i V }t f3UL)GET: Staff Rate Time Total Assist. $567/wee'; 3 weeks. $1,701 • . t 2) Now Ordinance Irnplernentation - Lilridscholoct Plans for Oil Operation Sites. �I �i As [)"art of the.last CLIP grant, the City hats developed new ordinnncns ,Mn U'iring oil i i operatian sites to be screened and iandsc►tped by July 1, 1703 or at the time of now ! drilling or rcdriliing, whichcver is sooner. Many of the smaller oil, sites scattered j f throurhout residential and commercial :areas are owned by very small, Independent operators. More than 300 wells pro operated by over 70 different independent companies. The operators generally do not have the resources or expertise .to properly develop viable Inndncnping plans for their sites which in many ways are the most offensive,.one,,; berraurr, of their proxirnity,to other uses. To aid them In their compliance with'this r►ew landscaping lnw, the City will prepare a,"hew to" pamphlet axplainl► g-Alle kinds of species that are most viable in tills nren, species that are enppcially effective for different functions, soil preparation, irrigmtion systems, onii strategies for locating tite plants to most effectively screen the facllities. The City would invite operators to a wnrlmhop to help then prepare landscape plans and to 1 solve problems particular operators may face on,their sites. Tlm City In requiring all nporntnra to nubrnit la►Kiscnjiing plans for review and approval. The pamphlet and workshops will help the operators to submit better, more viable plans. Objectives: Help effect thn Hadncaping arcfinance Chart; carrily and officlently by helping apern.ors prepare hotter- Inndscnpe lilnns. Thin should 1) reduce the staff review time Intar, 2) Increnan viability and irnp►ove the offectivenoas of the j inndscnping, and 3) help mnintnin n hood working relation between the City and oil # operators in implementing this ordinance. t l3UOGE'T: Stuff Rate Tine Total i Assist. $567/week p weeks $2,260 3) Continue LCh Implernentatiorr Pro ect - Improve meIl►t of Uolsn Chica !.leach. TI* previous CEIP grant has allowrd the. City•to work on itrntegirs to improve Balsa Chlcn Stmter Beach for necess, recrontion and visual resources, while,, at the name'thne necommodating all prnductitm facilities which have been operating on the site far s,iveral dechden. Significant progrcrr: hr►n bcnn•rnadn; tha project will have the effect of transforming an ugly, barren Industrinl-looking area into a hlufftop, coastal park. A pinn' for the pmrk lima been developed 'which hats been approved by the State nnpmrtrnent of Parka and Recreation, tile. City and the all companies. Tile, City,has , funding for bike trails, necesnwnys and other improvements and is applying for furids to landscape the site. The City fins also developed draft ordinances requiring the 'oil companies to.bury exposed pipellnea In .ic park site and to screen and landscape existing facilities. Other LCP policies strictly limit new facilities. �l�'F�r'a.TAu.1+.+.s..�.—+.—.. ...........�.......�-�........r•w.r;.•s.+.xui:�n p s+..-.,•nl.•.wa✓Jw:crw r u:'.?rwl.w...rn.w r...�.v LJ.{..�w wy7.t:s+r::+'.f..+tw.rw.w....�....wa.,.gy,...��"w+`n'w+.rsR.. 1 - The .,City.will continue itr; work on `this project: which"in rriticsrl to the succasoful tnrplementation of the LCP and to the community's perception of wut,valuo of coait-al pinnnfhg here. Public testimmy at the LCP heorinys,lndicatos thot this project 1; a high priority to the citizens who live In and visit the Huntington Beach coastal zone. r r . i ntn . Further wurk t.Ilt Includi! supervision and i nplarne rt•ht an of existing gra ,; f npplicntim for now furhdingp -detailed landscaping and recreation fneility, plans, lncrens!rdcommtxrity partiripat.ion, cmitinund work with the all cnmpnnirs to furthur refine policies affre:ting Moir operation and to encourage their voluntary finencial -participation in the overall project. ' Abjectiven: Trnnsforrn tills area into a pork, thus enhanrincj recreation, access and visual 'remurcrrr, while still ncrommodating' energy ,fncilitlrs. Continuntion of a successfu: ongoing project which is a high priority for the LCP in the community. BUDGET: Staff ftatc Time Tutot' Assist. $567;week 6 weaks $3,402 .t r t � i M�IM�t "'+�+�wa�e+•.,m+'M.F.ate+ .a/.'�'.�+rrMww�Mr�lrw•iur�w+w�.w.�+.ir.••.��+a.+ww�u.nr++�+..��'-+� .r - .. , .. .. 1,• ay Sj a ,1 f••jai '.r '1• .., 1. • ' ' j-t 1. '• ., � r • too,) f EXHIBIT V -- WORK PROGRAM City of Huntington Beach June. 9, 1981 OCS Planning and Ordinance Implementation Task 1.0 OCS Lease Sale 06B Document Review and Hearing Participation --Onshore imparts from New OCS and Tidelands Facilities. 1.1 Review the Draft Environmental. Impact Statement for Lease Sale #68; prepare comments related to onshore impacts affecting Huntington Beach; participate in public hearings on Lease Sale 068. Review and participate on the FEIS for Lease Sale 968. ' 1.2 Monitor new offshore activities, in the OCS (eg; Chevron platform in Lease-Sale U35 tract) and State Tidelands (egi Aminoil platforms in PRC lease 39) .. Review and comment on environmental documents and permit applications as appropriate. Products 1.1 Comments on DEIS, FEIS and other environmental documents and permit applications for .Lease-Sale 068, and other OCS and Tidelands proposals. Task 2.0 New Ordinance Implementation Landscaping Plan for Existing Oil Operation Sites. 2.1 'Develop a "how-tall handbook for the small, independent.,oil = operators explaiping effective ways to meet new screening and landscaping requirements developed as part.of the previous CEIP grant. handbook will include information on species type, soil preparation, irrigation' systems, screening strategies, planting plans and sample or model overall landscaping plans. 4 2.2 Conr?Lct a workshop for the oil operators to review the new ' • law's requirements and options for meeting those requirements. Product ' 2.1 A handbook as described in Task 2.1 above. Task. 3.0 LCP implementation ---- Improvements to Bolsa Chica Beach. 3.1 Develop a memorandum of understanding between the City ; and affected oil companies related to the conditions under which continued oil operations will be permitted on Bolsa Chica Beach. Viis 'is a continuation of previous efforts under prior CEIP funding : 3.2 Develop detailed landscaping. and recreation facility plans.. for Bolsa Chica Beach',to refine planning done, under,previous CEIP grant. ' Investigate funding sources, &bl3.c and private, -for aspects of the improvement plan not yet funded. This, too,. is a continuation of an existing,' and' thus far success ful, LCP implementation program funded in part by CEIP. 5,,.,�Y+n�,l�,r;•� ^'—•..........-..�_.._.......,..,...,...�.. .•.,......+.»..+.•..o-...:.....:t.w:ehr:•-�.w;.x:.,..•.w,www...sv+..w r.'+R...w.�«.....i.,:......w'.•.••I«.ae•sr•r..r..a..w•nuM+rr�lvrARiI7?�, • .�, •is 5 f µ f Page Two Products 3.1 Memorandum of Understanding as described in Task 3.1 above. 3.2 Detailed landscaping and recreation facility plans, as necessary. i .tom ... r • _ �}. •('• Yf"� t�.4��Y:1sl+'�t�'.�j��u.T.1i^•t.1�f u"�,Ztr.lhi,*..�.sts�•.avw:..0��f.u+.n..'.+na.+a.raf+.wu.....na.rsYw..,l«ter Ksr.ur.,.e..+w..'�.....s......r+........,.. -.+....,........•,...» 4'..'.,.`�'3y'� 1 , r '� I' '` '.i•i Tarr. •{ .t 'Ili 1' ,• -• r l f ,1, j t' •j Eh'HIBIT 'VI -- WORK. PROGRAM •SCHEDULE, ;J Ta Person July Aug. Sept, Oct, Nov. Dec. Jan. Peb•. Mar. Apr. Mont s _ 2.0 1.0 j 3.0 1.5 a `* EXHIBIT VII ---- PRODUCT DESCRIPTION AND SCHEDULE 1 , ask Product Due Date 1.0 Comments as prepared for various documents 2.0 Handbook 12/81 3.0 MOU 4/82 detailed plans 4/82 Progress Reports 9/81 . 12/81 3/82 41. • t - i, S {14�'�'�T`''`'�it3'4XiR"b"''""'^;. ..» .....•. ..»..-.....r,•«.........+ww.i.<,...<,n.e..w....»<.<tr..�..in......,».•-..w........«.... .oe. 1, x' i•. •• - • • ,';� •�' �� ;,.c'..; 1 7; % • EXHIBIT VIII -- STAFF ASSIGNED TO PROJECT . Classification Salary No. of Positions x Participation ,.. Asbt. Planner $537/wk. .5 90% f Assoc. Planner - 5x Clerical/Draftsman $8.00/hr. t• 'i EXHIBIT IX PROPOSED BUDGET f' Local mil tch CLIP TOTAL i Personnel Service 1671 8157 9828 Operating Expenses r Printing 100 100 :Telephone 50 50 :`. . Travel 50 1671 8357 10.828• PERSONNEL SUMMARY ti M�cttch CLIP TOTAL Asst. Planner 0 7371 7371 Assoc. Planner 1671 386 2057 4 Clerical/Draftsman . 0 • 400 400 k 1671 8157 9828 i Y is f YXiur.1�I�MIwa•r,•rw —�.-.-- :" '�. , • �en 1R'^,•. * t' �+w•R++ryw.w►�N�'.+�wwMMyrtW^•MMWrwl•'..'IMhT..w71rnIM+WA�1.N.Mw•W.n•w�••+\+.+YWYM�f .AMCTR ! Y t ` - s t �•1i t �. RE ' FOR CITY CC?UtVC'' ACTION Date May 19, 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Adminirst.rato I Prepared by: Department of Development Services� Subject: APPEAL OF THE CITY'S COASTAL ELEMENT TO THE STATE COASTAL 70MMISSION. Statement of luue, Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On May .11, .1981, .t:he South Coast Regional Commission denied approval. of the City's Coastal Element. If the City wisheE: ta appeal .thie denial to 'the- State Coastal Commi,s`rsion it 'has, 95 clays 'in which to do , d6ir . so after . receiving formal notice of denial from the Regional' misaion. ,' This notice ,is required within 10 days of denial. ' if the Council,;.eo desires, 'it may make some changes to the Element, based .on the major issues involved, 'before submitting to the State Commission. These changes could be limited to only those .items which' aould 'not signify a' major change in Council policy, but which would help narrow thee.', issues, no that the .:Mate hearing would focus on isubstantivQ..i©sues. These changes Would be, submitted conditionally - this means 'that the . . changes would, only-_ go into effect after (1) .. the Statc' certifies the element and (Z) the .Cit:y subsequently formally adopts the changes after public hearing, BECO t• EHA T3 ,I N t .'' The Department of Development Services recommends that the `City. Council appeal the decision of the Regional Commission to the State, 'Coastal Commission. It is .,further recommended' that the City;. Council set a study session to discuss` the Treasons .for tha. Regiondl. Com- mission's denial and consider any changes which would help focus the major issues. ANALYSxS� At its May' llth public hearing, .the South Coast Regional commission diaapproved the City's Coastal Element by,. a narrow vote. :(Five of the. six votes required for approval were obtairsed.) The South Coast Regional. Commission is accheduled to go out of e, btsnca on July 1, 19K,, and staff .recomne►nds that the City not consider further review of the Element by that agency. The Element's next review will be by the Stat:e .Coaatal Coimnisslon. certification by this Commission must be 'obtained before the :and ' use plan phase of the City's local; coastal; program can be `completed, Permitting authority will not be 're'turned to the 01t:y until the implementation phase is completed and certified by the State, •'�'^i' ..�.i�i r.:+.,,tci':x.wrrrr++a..�.oe+.•.e+-�.«.w•r1+....�.:•...•ew..:.„� . ... .....w+y.ewMMra'i'fVN4Wq�. 'ys t✓ �� , 1 Page Two The City .has two basic options for obtaining .certification by the State. The first option is for the City to immediately appeal the 'decision of the Regional Commission to the State Commission. The State Commission will most likely deny the Coastal Element i and return it to the City with a list of suggested modifications. Alternatively, the City can. make changes to the Element in advance and submit the revised version to the State as soon as_possible. These changes could be limited to ones which are consistent:.with . the.Councils, policy direction. and. would take effect only,af ter the State certified the element and public hearing, was held. .. (Should the public hearing process result in further changes or- additions, the Element would have to be resubmitted to the State.) The, City should still formally appeal the Regional Commission' s action. Stafk recommends that the second course of action be chosen. This. will' onable the State hearing to focus on the major conflicting 4 isaues: and speed the approval process.. . An_„impasse,.at the State level would either leave coastal permitting indefinitely in the hands of -the 5tate,'or. necessitate a long.'and. costly law. suit. The .South Coast Regional Commission did not give formal reasons for its denial of the Coastal. Element. Several concerns arising .from the Regional Commission Staff Report, however, were raised by the Commissioners -during the course of their deliberations. These concerns were an i followss _ -1. The 'staff report indicates that' the, areas fronting Pacific.. Coast Highway between Beach Boulevard and the Sarta,.Ana Raver which have beds depicted as wetlands by the California. Aepart- ` ment of Fish and Game are. not Afforded adequate protection by, the land use designations a_rplie.d to them in the City's Coastal . Element. 2. Vic staff report states ,that the' Coastal Element as currently written would allow the development of six.-story structures' on ` the Municipal Pier should that facility be restored or recon- structed., Structures of this height located seaward of- Pacific, #.; Coast Highway could create adverse visual impacts and impair public access. ! 3. The staff report indicates the Coastal Element is, not, speciFic enough regarding the intensity of..usen, particularly. the. building heightas permitted in- the area between Goldenwest and Lake ' Streets. (The plan specifies height limits in this area but states that these limits may be waived for consolidated parcels.) ;; � Page Three AM FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTTON: Appeal the Regional Coastal Commissionts denial of the Coastal Element to the State Coastal Commission without making any revisions. ; S ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Not applicable. CWT:JWP:CI:gc u A1 1. _ •iR ji.f rj'31S:faeMw..•« .....»- .-...... ..._.+.................. ,.w...,wwww..+.w«r.rr.wi+r.r.,rw.w.r.•...•w r•...«..rm.,....w.r.0 . RE EST ;i t� FOR CITY COUNCIL AC1"Qt �� 1 Submitted by James W. Palin Dap nment Development Services .. Date Prepared March 6 �.,,. , W 81 Onkup Materiel Attached [3 Yee 0 Na Subject LOOT, COAT ZWA PROGEW Sp_F.CrFIC PLANS FQR THE F1�4M „F, 01 i GOLDENWEST STREET TO BEACH BOULEVARD City Administrator's Comments APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Approve as Fecommended CITY Eva Statement of I:xue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Sourm Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The. recently adopted Coastal Element of the General Plan will be imple- mented by three .specific plans in the Goldenwest Street to Beach . _ Boulevard portion of the. coastal zone. Therest of the coastal zone implemrit:at:ion .will be develcped its the manner described "3ri tfie Phacie III Work F�rogrEm. At {is meeting of February 18, 19I , the Downtown Ad floc Committee recortmended expediting development of three u plans by requesting the Catty to authorize funding for specific plans. + Coats will be recovered when development occurs by an assessment of ' charges to developers upon entitlement or by reimbursement from the Coastal Commission or the State. RECOIWENDATxON: 1.. . Authorize the expenditure of $14,810 from the FY 1980-81 unappzopri- atdd general fund balance to fund preparation of the specific plant; from May through June, 1981, 2. A'uthorixe 'crention of a now account in the FY 1981-82 'Department of Development Services budget for Local Coastal Plan implementation and budget $81,662 to continue funding preparation of the specific plans from July, 1981 through April, 1982. i 3. Direct staff to begin preparation of the three specific plans for the Goldenwest to Beach Boulevard portion of the coastal zone. ANALYSIS: The Land. Use Plan for the coastal zone will be implemented by mea'Zis ' of -zoning ordinances to" be developed in Phase III-of the Local. Coastal ' r no 2M 'rv;�?"i6.rl'«a°- v. ..4.r:. -s:. ,.'�.�4�,.i+•.h.•.. �f F1'. .r,l•-:'?',. .."i.t. A'•I:Y..;1.'�t' ,+•,: lu.:-1:.4t1:.+..v .I/I:w uav«a.�r:•L'w.+wiM Y61r2 t'tcSL'll,:"i1�:lT7iX«^.•"" t, t , ' l i� � �A{, 5 q •�, Y � � 1 } '�Ii3L� 5tL19g�L�+t' t17 Yl ` _.•tR11 M ►"G11UHI'lLY1F' �jq5 y{;� n�7 yr,,�. A �"�1'��ryry €i� � � 1 X'r r t£ �x�, /i��:i ` ��'�5�If��vy���f r�aa�f :,Z�•i; r .�.,' � ,r � y, � �+� �!� E ti �bIF'� ` �`#' '•'+ ,�i t��l +�i �� � 4 r^� ;i: 1<i N a,,,.+1�,� �.� Y..�, 'y � '�'i�'�;If"�i.ig��S:Y tv X 1 .�1"}�.. �+;' ,�� t � r '1. � 1` �'.•}�'���� `5 r�, :iy 1 �it 5��r� ��`4��i'i y ,�� , t�'� j <�:'�?,`a ��yl:.:l.',' � �1�� � Jl. t�trly ��' ��.��:1t, ,� y •,� ? r �`.�t rr! L�'; 4r . . +�` �?:'i � r "LLaic+1. ` F .4yralr, �'y;;•Sv ..2 r, .. .t'Pi'% r-i" „ .G^:�: !•' i 1• 'i �,k. ! s�. Ij�:? i� rr" M. 2.r' +i' .i`�,t r� • t'' a'iy. _,., �' . • •ii! Y +� j• r y� 1 i r.i5 i..�.�,x,. "i "3ii`f �:'�'^b rr �t)jtu. �,1 ? '• 't/r'�i�� �::1'rf�t il�t`L1C;,�^��44 ��;�,'� � k .� ' �:f �y ..iiks'f.�•� 'i,'1..'t1y ai�` �"Z i��.$��7 j.i.rr' 't"��:�'S i�,., r �����°: �� r'y �� t�r -� ,ir�- '�st .�ljS'rr sal ``4�1 t. i. �c ;Y. i •+ ' k :h1 •y� .a�y0� �': �1 �' t� � '�� !'!� .r��.� -1�`L �}ti�M� � ��„ •�r�, � �� � ,� .�` {ti., t�� � li .��.•�`l. t Lfi ,.,r ?.�'r�'rt2+: �{! ti,� J' +tWY i �y ( r{t r r � 1��k �� t.l a '+r_'.t S S1W'. Y�f �{a $rMR3tifffi�. x �,� ' ;} T ,�!"ti ' � .�at ,�. s " �� � �i����il> �t��v :3L�� ij����r�L�� v y7�µY�����ry,• {��k " 1' �/���� a f.} •x.. t��T f�, a '( � +}.� iA `.��`��l T„r����.1 M �h���E�f".`�t�,,'y�,.+.,,,,,�.�, , � .+f���,,�3��Y'f�> t ! '•��'. e 34�,r.''��.yt,��%p�j j"9$ � {{ ��' M 1 f c.r� .h� " 6r nI� � �{'�� r. 'r� �{,� 4� _ ��,. y ".4,. }r�Y)ji� ,��i,.pe�� k��ror� y� ,=.a. •i',]t U� � .y r{F1���C,�r1r 17 T\ x 7 t{ l l 5.1•.a �!.. 11• A S p 1tt •1<• f ) At '91 `1 11 1(k" •� , , , '�'�t�t' f � �"o. �?'';�. � t.�. .� .�� j a �+ . �, '�,le�Fy' r, �rfjtt•. , d 5�/}�t •1! "S �s � N •! � � � .1 ,t t. f ti .��� � r ff f f '�" 4� .f '2.• .� c 4.. .��•,r. 17 •q �¢, .t�5t?� .+y� . ,�; 'TY, ! .„ �r,; �yy++ �� '+91 ,�tta+, S � .�, � Zd� �, .i�tt;,ES}{'� .� +h����, ��,t�tt t'�'},��r�itr�. .7° t + •.fs� L�"' g.�i�;;}} tiS'�.tJ,� 4 ' e�� ti" $.t�' .�,,,�. � �q1{. ,+�1, g r.:��r �.' h j� A}�����{��D,. I�r 4`,. �,{ LCP Implementation i March 6, 1981 Page 2 Program, In some areas, however, issues such as noise impacts, traffic, fragmented ownerships and small lots indicate that implementation could best be carried out by means of a specific plan. These plans are ordinances which comprehensively address development standards for a geographic area, thus allowing special problems to be handled without the necessity of extensively revising existing ordinances or burdening them with special circumstances which would not be applicable in all. areas. Because of the unique problems inherent in the Goldenwest Street to Beach Boulevard segment of the coastal zone, staff has recommended the preparation of three specific plans .For this area. The first plan would address development front Goldenwest Street to Sixth Street between I13citic Coast Highway and Walnut Street. The second specific plan would deal with development in .the downtown area of the coastal zosie from Sin th Street to Lake :street. The third specific plan would include the area from Lake Street to Beach Boulevard. Other coastal areas which will require specific plan implementation lie between Beach Boulevard and the Santa Ana River. Implementation for i these areas will be addressed separately at a later date. Considerable public interest in the development of the. downtown has been + generated by the Local Coastal Flan. Many property owners have been waiting for the plan to be approved and are now anxious to begin the development process. As soon as the implementin; zoning is adopted by the City and certified by the Coastal Commission, responsibility for permitting will be returned to the City, greatly simplifying the process of obtaining development approval. For these reasons it is important that.: the zoning implementation of phase III begin at once and proceed � in a timely manner. Two Assistant Planners will be necessary to perform the technical work. l• Citizen input to the plans will be extensive. particularly in the early stages when .Floor area ratios and density bot,uses for lot config- uration are developed. Several workshops .:III be held to encourage public: participation. Conducting these workshops, interfacing with the community, coordinating the development of the plans, and supervising t their :review are tasks which r quire an Associate Planner. Therefore, three planning positions are allocated in the projected budget out- r lined below. t. M=thly Cbsat to City Cost in I'Y Cost in FY rY 80-81IFY 81-82 DO-81 (2 rm.) 81-82 (10 ma.) 1 Salaries & Benefits Sxlaries & Salaries & Benefits Benefits Total tAssistant Planner $2,277/$20,459 $ 41554 $ 24,590 $ 29J44 *Assistant Planner 2,277/ 2,459 4,554 24,590 29,144 *Asswiatae Plamu 2,468/ 2,665 41.036 26,650 311 586 Total Planning Salaries: $14,(144 $ 75,830 $ MEN Uraf t..x (1 sm.) $ 2,004 $ 21004 Opa sting tbsts @ 5% salaries: 766 31828 4,594 T:�tal PEG r Cost: $14,810 $ 81,662 $ 96,472 *Limited TUM �tUr...Y.« ... .. - -_......_. ....-_�.. .. ..... .. .-.._....,... .,. .. ,. .: .., ..,... r .... . , .. ,. r...... .w ..w........«.«r..•......,awwv K'4ai..A:r'.+.r.iri/ae...•.�,t.y.Y' : , c 3 f t , s, fa t� ` IL LCP Implementation March 6, 1981 Page. 3 Although the City must initially advance the money to prepare the specific plans, it will receive reimbursement of the funds expended. Reimbursement can occur in one of the following ways: 1. If specific plans are approved as work tasks in a Phase III con- tract between the City and the Coastal Commission, they could be reimbursed by the Coastal Commission. This does not appear to be likely, however, given the financial problems of the Commission in the coming year. Coastal Commission staff have indicated that it has not been the Commission's practice to fund specific plans ex- cept for those portions which would be directly linked to carrying out coastal policies. it is not clear how much of the proposed specific plans would be a justifiable expense under this criterion. 2. Reimbursement could be obtained under SB 90 for performing work mandated by. 5tate law. Requests for SB 90 funds must be approved. . by the Couatal .Commission are work that.was necessary to comply with the Coastal Act. There is some question as to whether or 'not the Commission would approve SB 90 funds for specific plans if it would not grant money to develop the plans in the first place; In addi- tion, SB 90 monies are limited, and even approved expenditures may not be fully reimbursed. 3. Local jurisdictions adopti.g specific plans may now charge devel- opers in the plan area for the costs of plan preparation., California Government Code Section 654531 the enabling leyislation, requires that a fee schedule be established at the time the specific plan Is adopted. The schedule should assess costs in proportion. to benefits under the plan. These costs may be per unit or�per square f..,ot, or any equitable arrangement the City desires, so long as ,; . the costs assessed do not exceed the actual cost of developing the specific plan. Under this option, the money initially expended.by the City could be recaptured, but it might take many years for all (or even most) of the funds to be recovered. The exact length of time required to completely recapture the expenditure would depend upon how fast development and recycling of existing uses proceeds. A decision by the City to fund development of the three specific 01'ans will not preclude staff frnm exploring. any of the above reimbursement l strategies. It is possible that a combination 'of all three might b% employed. The Coastal Commission could agree to fund some aspects of the plans and might approve the City's seeking SB 90 funds for other portions. The remainder of the coats could be charged back to developers as provided for in the California Government Code. FUNDING SOURCE: Unappropriated general fund balance. ` ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: I. The City may wish to develop the specific plans without hiring additional staff. In this case, no appropriation would be necessary. If this alternative is chosen, the probable completion date of the �NT.•tw•. Y }♦trw........... . ..... .... .... . ..............r.•. t.. .rr •f a,/vlle.t:'...`.a{�.ni".rLy l..t:.:iit4 ...7 i..nsr•.v..w.+r wow..M/nMi../-rwYNM i+%K f r,'�i:i.Yw 1• /a ,u,Jnrltr.S•-i;33 -. l 'f H Y , h �x 'Y `1� � `".v � if\ f ! fl) t # t�f. Q��, ). F�.S .� a•7Ft} ,�' a i LCP Implementation March 6, 1981 " Page 9 r implementation phase would be considerably delayad. Because the specific plans will be part of phase III of the Local Coastal Program, delay of the completion date might jeopardize the oppor- tunity for funding the entire Phase. rII program. Funding prior- ities for 1981-1982 are being assigned by the Coastal Commission based on timely completion of the plans. Plans scheduled for completion beyond' 1981 may not be funded. 2. If desired, funds could be appropriated to, begin 'only, one or two, o� the proposed specific plans., Again, this might delay comp�gtion of the entire implementation phase. There are, .however, economies of . time and effort to be achieved in solving certain of the early quentions' simultaneously .for all three areas. Developing floor -area ratios, density bonuses, setbacks, and open. space requirements for the three areas at one time would be more cost-effective, ;t Respectfully submitted, mes W. Pa1in Director JWP:CC:df L '��,�?�.'.:��a.w+�-...•..�., .........i.......rrw+.s+..rl'w!.1+.'ls.:'PA r..+,i cat,.ta',.:.::.•:l yc.f,•ia_.I.i:,,a:.,.i.rtN:•-.:.G XJi.:l',N '.R'cfs.,H.• w:rMM fa.•.r+.e++,+ + *R•GtiiY.wr e.n.•,,.!wa.•«+wN#rRK�RN.nrd 4Y"tsC;}' . - .. -. .. i•,i 1, ,� � �. '+ �, '•�raf t ,�� 1 ��"�'�`� �� » r� � •'1�� 1 �,. .�j� �h ?�� � �� ,,�. � �, ry � �` q�lS'fir• 1r•�t1 f � ► +� �,±, �j � ,"�'�''�r � �' �. '; .. �� j! � r! 1tj r v r• i {, t "` R`. }r w..�s • l p "a' „- ? 'a �i 4 1 �q,� �r , ♦• Il 'r. y.t� _ � � ` f .�id, .�. .�� •4}•. a 'u1r 1: ..R s :`'�� ;1 N �� . t 1 ,1 '♦ 'L i, a, 1 1 • • 1 . 1 • • • • a . • / • r 1 r I 211 . Ir • • • s • • • ► • it i 1 i , • • I / 1 •L 'a 10 i f.. �•rY 7• t• 4• t 1,• t , 1 , 1,.' k il, j �' n ;- 1 y�'.r, - T 7 ! r � .`r 1.. .' *i� �,Z�{fl"V( til r S + y r ;+.. 'j , P.1't1Ay ! aA 11 1 I .fir ��1 f• y h r 1 .. yl / •1{ f A 1 � ! f r 1 y .l �y4 R ♦ � � T l Mlr � ti #. • a� �''7 Ml l �., a+ v � 1.. r -,{,,y, 9, y L�♦4 . {j,4 1.,r, r 1 Ibf 11 r , , t 1 l rr > x r l� .• .•i. ��� 'iY {�h f �•, LI 1`f.,s� r +�� �♦� ;. r e1 y°«mot l a �, K y y'fl � 1 y, '� 11 7 1 1+1 � jLi Y" 7 �•�' ' t,♦ � ��}�i�l y F W Y. . 11 '�f• �' t' 1}kl,}'1! 1 � �• t +y l t a a �• s• i s ' � � 1 1 � 1 ,� 'r t � .s 1-r r '3� N• { r'1 YY �Y? f'., � ,��:� � a ^,��,1�. . t • r� .,,.♦ a 1, +,4 � �i. 4 1�• ,. � � * yj� A� '•Tarr i{. {, L A ,! ,r l 'l � �. � •F �• �+ ,r� � �n' � r' `,•'� F ..(+ �,. �J?�+ , + t-` i w" >}•�` �+�r k � 1 "r 1}} b�t�' 1+ n r �+L , •.b t .L `�.+, t .al'Ir ,1,. � ; rt.. ,.14( ;� t ".? ,1 i`l l ( ,ti' i i+. •1i ti :' �rl, ..r ��r, y . 'ty 7 •+,tti ♦+ '• 11t 1i ! • ► 32. c � ,�,+ Y �tii t�l�a'a7 r 1'��,� 1�+ :1kt ! �4 k t Jc+i',�,1 1 a ; 14.y�#4•. ,ML�+t,P,1.}.t� r+ r,�d ) 'll c i ar y a+l I(�,,/y1 {L �1 L, r' tgl�`l c�il z ."��41 1 ti �1 ti�''trPF��� �•GT'M'e111 �' � y ;�,,4y�{.1� y1�: ��t �kAt�'`'�l i"��}it'iy�r.�+�, �+1 �['�l'r 41 1,k At?i�r i•r Sk.�ti}��. A�'�µ r�'.YS'L�y,.Q •Rti '6va..,� 'jTt.r`1 r,tt.,, F � ,.,;.'', xl.�tlj',+) ►4y1.-: .lk k 'iy -{} ` lr7ll{ltty} 1ttyt4!y�y ��•;1' �illr.>l*+Ste'� .itxfi,4� :Y.y. T..' .+ .', ''''tL , '�"""4 l"' :. 2 lh'ti � � L ',rl L+ � +�,(' . �a'0�c 1 ht !� �1,�' •t {f„ r.. r , +F� ',t ,'�r \" i x:♦ µ. ♦ 1�11" .,r .,i,I p.} 1 � ; � 1�11.. a i.,��}y y st.�L,,wt � 1-}. .:. qy♦ 7, l:♦!y �, t • 4 1 P♦.i'} , i, .1 "�• 't • �. � f + try AAAAAA r la h. y� 1 U � '� l D , ah q�7 >. rY�1 aSa f�94A a�` � �r,{,,. -' irY� .5 !+'y 4�{`+ •�y•.IJ-or' {kr.-AS L'111,1"^+ 'S',iT V � r � , >� yl .. � � er f+ / Ay, �. h �. .1 t+ 1 + �" ♦. t r1, ;� �� r r.1. a ALA �: 1 ,t, r �+i 7� n 1 \�R 'rT "�I.. F 4n lid � ', y �. • �f� r� .. ti 1 F t y 1S l nx �= y h{1r 1,' r J.+ ��r � l yi •.�.;� 7 .� l � h+y} ly .}+ S .�++. 1 i, �ryStti l�}y• iv, �h.. �', f is a I'e r. I y.•2 {. `• {^, `:�r� f r�� � • �. !) yi� � ij' + ��• L, }t� ,LL e .r ♦ �' ►s+ S i 5...• y v .•y �{ 1 L•.rlt:r' •.�-. � S .r ,'�-1.{.� r'�_ r� f� _ �t, a �..{'.L•,-ay,,,•,, •!_.� v ]i'. .}, i 'j:4,� t. , .. .4.?.•'r 1 'twf� •' 6 �,i � a0,11., "CIN 1 • �w CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �L FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT PraJect Name' Re nested Fundln for Development of Specific Plans Rol, to Local. CoastalProgram Description M Requested'//Funding for Three .�� Positions In the Development 5e'rWces Department Lt.M,!kt TCr, N 1. DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 .1 One-Time Costs An 'urn. , ac .. Acquisition n ru Construction ui men Co st c ties. E i~ Other Total Cost $96,472 $ 96',472 1.2 Recurring Anhuel Costs Addltlona Mazer' a s 8 uts de Pa rail Personnel Su Iles Services Revenues Total Cos 1 .3 Replacement/Renewal Costs N/A s 2:' 'INDIRECT COSTS �c N/A • 4'j:`a1*f1t"'i`'`+(''„,J.'Rtipt�wawr'..'.......-w.......r•......_......�..v.......,.+........ ......._...+...•+.,e..awrvK4 cfr[a.,a.s.+u.•wr,rn.�..: w. . . ' ;T-rr+\NI�M'^'/' '40 'r'KU,e•Nw,•+rw•�...w�r�,r.�a.w�..aM.+rwu.r 7j, ' 4 Financial Impact Report( 1 Page 2. , 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A _.__ _.�_�...._..___.._ -.... _...�..._... s - F A 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE. PROJECT N/A •y " S. PROJECT USAJ;E Tot at dedicated effort Al rected Xowardj �,h2;accoml l jbment Qf- tbI2di:Q,Iw 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING It is anticloateedd that the new employees would be actively enn2aa`ed in thls 'pr0 66t bX May 1 . 1981. s- 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING• THE PROJECT4 N/A •4 Rl 1,11", INJ N WAD= L 4 P x CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 0� P.O. BOX 190 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CALIFORNIA 92648 SUIL17ING DIVISIOU 17141 53"241 PLANNING DIVISION(7141636-5271 TO:. Honorable Mayor and City Council , ATTN: Frank B. Arguello, Acting City Administrator FROM: James W. Palin, Director Department of Development Services DATE: February 20, 1981 SUBJECT: PRIORITIES FOR COASTAL, COMMISSION FUNDING IN 1.981-1982 For your- information, I would like to call to your attention the .fol-- lowing facts. A recent report to the California State Coastal Commission from their staff; projects a budget :shortfall estimated ,at$600 000 to $1, 500, 000 in 1981-1982 and suggests guidelines'-for prioritizing funding requests during this period. Hearings were held before the Commission on February 19, 1981 to take public testimony on. these priorities. Jeanine Frank of our staff attended this;_ meeting and gave testimony on the proposed guidelines. Representatives from Los Angelea City and County and. the Alliance for 'Coastal Management also testified. *t' ;•! Following the 'public testimony, • Commission'tmembers and staff' di's- ' cUssed, the proposed priorities and the concerns 'voiced ,by .those who :gave testimony. Michael Filcher,_ Executive Director of the Coastal Commission assured the Commissioners and our staff member that Huntington Beach would fall within priority classification two. This should ensure` that the City will'-be funded for 'its; LCP., implemen.- tation phase, .but; does' notguarantee the level of funding which will be granted. The largest portion of the City''s Phase III grant zaquest was funding for, the three specific plans in the Downtown area. It is still unclear what ,the Commissions position will be on these items. •I will keep you informed of any further developments on this subject. Respectfully submitted, 01 James W. , Palin, Director t j Department of Development Services is i ,;� •.,. r11t �,..,.,.�.t,�d.:..ufry'�A:.:is.'nwvr++.rr++r+•.wr�rfn..'a•r+u.me»fri+.;u..a.i.•'.'.•. .t: .2::.t:.r,(•::.:`L.::L;.'J:SYd:•':.'h.tx•'3.5...:.:vi.�'1HfL•:Rxa,.pan•...uar.....r......•...e....nw.w•..r�.�..w.r..' 1 t. i x � f , l r ;i H't CITY OF HUNTINI�` ON BEACH . P,O.BOX 190 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CALIFORNIA 92648 BUILDING DIVISION 1714)530.5241 PLANNING DIVISION 1714)535-Ml TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ATTN: Frank B. Arguello, City Administrator FROM: Department of Development Services DATE: December 10, 1980 SUBJECT: COASTAL ELEMENT �r '110"' JGu s i>• cash%' Staff has recommended under Agenda Item D- 1 A, that Cou+�nil take a o straw vates on various .sections • of the Coastal Elements in order to give direction for the preparation of a final document that Council . can adopt on January 5, 1981. fi • In order to facilitate discussion, , staff recommends that: Council first finalize the Land Use Plan; secondly,rrrevise and approve the policy package contained in Section 10.5 of'the element; and thirdly, make any desired revis�lons to the text of the element. Please 'be sure Vo• bring your copy of the Coastal Element: containing :r , the Planning Commission's reco mmended additions and deletions, as this document will provide a common basis for discussion. Respectfully submitted, as a. Palin, Director Department of Development Services JWP:JVIC:gc ., 7i••„" )a1+{.il laewM•r,•""•••.�•.+aw.ar»t4,r4t6.",1FRi sik iiw6it�au..h..fh.i��.*r:, �,'1.'.)P/��i..iil..:Tr IL�..;�i::a..l.T�• k, rir, Fl•.W:ttt� 7 V+f.14 rw.w..Ya�v..r,.r+n... r . r 'r j �} '� �y�1�L ��tir � r� � �+ t� �tt+��l' 1�.# r ,t4,a� 1 r �� i'1 1` ,1 }�,�''� fir .► } 4, '1 Y .} � r w!>�;�; i w ,` ,t '� r �5�..�9: • d' �'r �'?it• � t• Y � ,� �, t. �. t � �T.. ,�,Y ,y �,�r7 r, ,� '�s ��s� r !.,�. �.� �t��'+.� a � �� �� } � � •t k 1 1 1'.1 111 Superior Court 111"t tla: �r•,t'r•r•:lfl•1•.�I,Irlltr�l� In.udll,'r fill-I'n111115 ••1llydn�A CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH+ CITY CLERK I'Irl It It'1 It'1-1 Ill 11.%'I•I111 Public Hearing -Coastal Element `t:1tr„I 1'ahtl•nua ► . . . . . . ! ,,A, ': 1U'6 tCmGtRJN(,i c,� Y�'• .1�.•r;tn r r,i 1 1'nunle ul I ltnnir 1 NQ7YCENHI�tKppatYt5Vtlwj , tt.•;i , ��CiuE6+►efc6rl�1'k A'b171.7Yti'NP..;,..�`.•�;C,h�''•� ''. 1',5f,. ..�r�'�;zµ�r cuwr,l p�tlYnr'!r'via6rM1 1l�aCit7Qrwatilat ,�': 4'"a�,•+.,.;r+'�L,t,,.,.. (1mt1r1ttr111 ReK3i UI tAI Sao►N r ►y t�5""71�,.t ' . _Ha+ofar, 1BD hr lb '7D Pat.a ropy 11�r1i b 11r Cwux,7,. Rita J. Richter n e;' tom+ t.KlYrww orr�lli�• u>ar,�; e 007t11{.�•,. ray M mdifat ,rq��ytt��,R 'I; . Cp�a{esd poor°d c t°d�esyt rr�t i11ts�Ea t rletl...,rio •.,, . 7:� r M 1<t rtt trt 1"hat 1.un and u1 all Unu.hrtrin nu•nunnrd w,1•,t I lturn u) " 14C1�Nrtlrtrt ��"� 4tlr +. , �: ►�'r r t 111rftlrrtrll M 1dak►efNK aprpWl/ tip '?"�� y fo f I'nitrd tilalr•.nu• the n r nl Mrnl1 nnr 1r,1r...1nd th.lt 1 <`•ar 'c w7broMdn►dfrsgltlrOfiL�n/tuMYayk3uMd4 and(lr$fl faft�•II1,Illr ta;•1Yf�T.•*':i.,:A.•�'�'c •.t,r;;.,•, ., rs I r intrrr•I11f in till nlrrru I ntlticd nl.lttr r; p;,ydl( ion , Ih,lllnrnlht Uiroll.dslrrLu •i � r- '}r •1 t ,,r,�a�;:��A?�s;71 ,=..y ,,� a_.��� ��4y.}. •I I flhl uullrtullht• � Ir ,! > r s ,,. i. 'ir#flit"ti:'�`;rrh {�. �!r"•'''trtt'i 1 i 1r1rh Ph+r.l plq r Jr(TNCWlfl/rTfNfi701� ttl art�:�'Jy,1` L7 Y 11,Yfa r 1 1 i. :8r. HuntingtOn Beach Independent t, "IYIc; d n Evendent Review •. t �,, I = f t .. . , � �Y � r,,. _'.+;�'�fa4°,5•�,• ,,��y4 n nrw•pallrrnf 7rnrnd cirrulali at,pllhli.hrd in till•1'i11 l,1 r `Y�< �•`. 1 '� t a ( � 'rt'r' ftt•1 � �,i >,��' s•'.l?Ill�'',{.�,1"i�:r: :,1 yt.t' •4•� .' Cj'�' r , { { !Ir Ii4,t1�.t t it,t,il: LKr t J�'�` EIC f j•{t'=. Hunt ington Beach � _: r ', f s ! Kr' S , ; +- ♦a 3• � ',,.",,)' 1'uunli of fl►anxr and which nrw•.n w•r i+ `'r` 5f° '�"", .`' '� ` � ll ,•, Y+tit �r�rr(� i�y�`'a�•r�`!'�` 1 I (N1r+ll.irrd fill! Ihl• "r!• j' ' r r!; !'fry tl •1 ;; t t i2 = }.t1�`�, di•rminalinn I,f 1-al nrw%and intellil;rltre,ut n rt•nrr,ll I Itar,lc t'.:+ ` 5;. L. t` ?a ' r ' ",„k j. t li. :,.L •' ter, and which nrwglaprr nt Jill tirnrlr hrrrin `Z.tr1*?&; ��"1�s and dill 11.1,A Ieim:f fillr.nlncriptian li.t of(ralill .nh•l•rilh•r• ;, �tr'-'' ' 1�;'{ ;�" ' 3t'�; '147, .�•; i�I 1 1!'ff i ;'Ji s'Yi and which nrw. i Hill(AI(rrt h•t+h•rn e•.Inhli.hl•11. Itintrd :aul p r >, �,.� r tics �•.;i' I�r:, li,hlll lot nf;ular inlrn'al+in till raid ('uulily of(Irdur;l• I'll, .1 ''C 1, t .r ix � „� � �.r tf� � 1�t �►�..f����.�'�}I�.'.' prri1l11 ruvrdint; unr �t•er; thnt till• nulirr•, t,f which IhY• IMAM,` t '� 1 tip '-:I•'�' t r allnrtlYl 1•!1 Irintrll tU AG'fl r r Ila. Iran puhliJud in till a�F rt•t ul.lr "'•f f` +' ,1 t.;t. (fir tiiti,_t' t is;,i'�'� ''and cnlin•i..ur lit mill nrw.p.gwr,and nut in am .oppirinrnl Ihrrrr it. it,tlit.fn ,Iw r• ! � ` +t }' 'II illl;(filler,(111111' „ •�', �?,xl ly -r.+, r /. ry`., ,y'ts�• 1[.� t�,� '' �.E��3•i••��.F'Y � ' S r- - .., ., 'r. •."'� /sjtl!.�,I �'y�f��tfa K�4iLL'>z'x November K :� r 9 JS l[ ,r ,) 'tkri !is C/'rt ;t Novem 61' 198Q ' 1Y;5 �'f�1StV" Y + r i4 +' i J,j(i�t�' R,��F+1¢r,�{�4 t,tzilnt = 5`j, ".d1 ' r't i•'t = t rid -1 R.t lr i ,t 4� I�ryyi1� •�F'r.' it / iF `• r- { r'• fr' ,i r1 + ial .:r��PS >t�� Faytj�l�l 'L4F••7��'' �� .� ;r 1. •> rll,� a{•{ , r.� r4.1•;� ;k.�'1..- `{�����}�t�i�+S{} i,�l. r' r /. 4 ( '� /�',�! F/ .=l.}.�• � •...:SA H 1'j rt �'}T,.7•�Ifj1l�,���•[ �.,`�`. 1 lrrlit{ fur dlllarl•1 under e•n,llty n '' .•.• i`, tx b.rp�i ST- t�;: i•' jx.t�1r � � ,�.<t1t,; 1 1(a•rjun'Ih:11 the I,•rl 'll tr 1',:' •! "� +'?' .Y;>wS ;tf�- a't r', w (t S'r i11►1,Ir111•and lllrfl•t f. 'i. t, ,j�A.•!1s . r ' ,.r:,'+f' i ��" SL�i'.tt i :t;'.�,�1+ `r: '1. i�'; •r$:., `� `I: ':'N,1 't.. .. '1•'t sri+i'n II.Ilrllal..•. ...,.....r'',�rden Grove •'''''`•E.. ` `:� :1'` �.'.`•� fr;ti� .�'�t.� t.��;�'�''' ,�i,t''{t:r�tCA��kt+,;;'�+���{,r`'i;. t is ,J a 1'� ,,,rrS1 ,F 5• lkrt tr ... ................. r �`•( A ,• ` • ..i�7 wM `•1` '•'�7�•43`i t t ,1� t 1 r�:'t'1: 1.\bth �. / 1? 5 y C.'alil rtli,l,il .�, 11 ftvemlhvr .. $Q Y.`A y 1. Y t r .V �•��. ��L,'•� �.r ,l ,I r t�1.;J! �1~`� t �t ,•t• S� ��' ' ,51 .'e 2} �t.`�. AD11 1J ! ! � r•' •• •. � •, - r �Cam. r., a;,. •, / :.t f, �. Y � •r•, ,iUamItorr L �4 ( �r .+,, , +'s. t► :cr�)v s .'s ?1, �' s �v r ,� fa: ,`{lt `}}~ct,l Y !,'`' �rt,r t7� , • ::�� �liel",C +• ;Fr�t� ti :� d • l i�t•� �; ; ;.�/.• .:�'Yr ttF3:4}rr's� 'NJ'; "._. h I 1..r r S`t. r Eltl •45irtr. - y t t 'S.1 a '(''•' .. ,1'�.��)� Yt� .11','�� y.i• �1 5 -{' '�r,�1-'l�Zr1..t, ,L '` �� t11' t:' -�'<.>' ';�[yy`• � Is'y.'.it,,, Y"itktri 1 4 t 'i 1 '_� ,�tl.'• I�r� Y .. t r. .r �'`j,. , Li.jni jl"'� ''t' r ''�� ' +•t._'.'•� •I J x '''•„��, �1iY'll�, Y. , ��,,pp+ �4�sc :rr t: ;�r �t a4,��;,i tt• •s r tt t �vT't L?�;..�It�t, } •J ' �� ( ,' } ',i .w.,, �s�i� i:;,�'L' "iA Jr5 Y lI' � � '7�3+� jrn�"r�if+ I; t:�,� s 4��. Ir t.kuitt � � y�. �f 11 •Ir :.. 7'P+.f � 4�`,J? ;��'' r'•• '�,P.7! i. 9„ lrY i..,Ir'S r� i '..,�J• i'*is • ,J.1.:<t'4 .t(.' 1,• •'':t'• ;i �; e. C.1-'t�'.r►�j r r' (, .'1 t+.,. 't ti.�,<n:n�,{jfw 1 S= •r't�� F.t:" ''.R L. 1 1 / ;'r, ' :�• ,.r,.'lr.•..:Cf:l!.' }r 'ij i;%`l! ,••sa r ci./tr.r. , '�{ •:�'�.�,f. .•r Jr� ••Sy ,1' i•tli�{if4�+�ili I t .t•.' �•S{.1r. r �. �.. (:r/•L •. �Lia�i�,►.r�r;rMj�rr,tr.4k r,y7` ,r••t;�'.{,i: r a5i'I;`' )r, Slt ( .1yt PY, i �ytY'f� L' •i r:,';�. - >r.1�,u r.•y.. 1;,,i,. .,w-�}."- (1 s: .7F ��� �•i + �� �'' MrP}TINGTON r�YIY+�jS,r[ t� if •PL4N,MNG'U j0R c .t J+ ' l I} T�• ' •.t ✓1 _5.. ,�? .t, A + r t •"t rtt; fir, t ♦ tt' ;� l' ,k' � -+�oastal�Zone�(310 ,.. .,� ,f' . . ,�.:�� •�}'";:x�}A; �'.�:cr�: • ,. •x x�}r��� ;', '•I����� �` P'�J S. ` .9f' � Jv'•' ti Rat .1t�S + *�- >Ya R. ` +.{ }'1. �'t P' _'> r INA pr ,S� y r•�71.�71, 141;A y�a, R f ,` '• s-(t { ;`y=:r - 3 ..1 t}1"�"t fi Yl.,�r.Xy;;+ � -c �,�� i .r,# / �, ;� t{'�� '`+" `'.J• ,��1• •4 a' 47 �'#' Authorirrci.to.Publish AdsierHscmen s �} ,ry of tJralnd Public notices by Decree of the Superiorkinds, «.�.;e�., }�' fir. � t. !i mot•j' �±: ;. " jd.r. •.. ?C,r M� a , ; � `. CQUrt n9a County. California, Number A•671d dated?9 f : +` .�' `x ''T, tl' '., e' •' "Se;,iftmt r,196t,and A•24831, ated 11 June, Milt, ,I• nc, t963. �.r•'1}, 1CCy �� �, 3MAO; ( `ii`r�y .y"�� �1►�(p� i e. EOFCAL' ft 1FQRMIA r F,� fs>rt±fittr z ,'j-A �sfmlt u� r,I��1t�t ,I-A Cgun ty 40, range ,; ,r.• j CID rfh}#I—F.",rll}r i}� 't y�1 ....t .v►[*. 1 1_, {. J • to)At ItR Sella r fry w' litr toIYMw t, { r,r } T•r + i f Yf 1�" Ybt11. }, r. xu� r•� l Twf�fRl h,,r }� 1� }�` ,'� t' i ,r•• R'' k �' •'tii sT 1 am.a Citltr►i pt the Utiitiii States ands } r the Cnurily,Qlares a resident of :Y�� ,' ;>, .... � I' #�r � ► ��. , i ' yea•bl gnil'rio ' aid; I urn over tt a age of eighteen {fri:' ;, 11'} a t,.l f €' g '�:entJt t a party to or Interestr,; f+► the below' '` `';` i'11 ,:' ;• f�t'tt1 l matter. I am a Principal `'Caast`D�II.]' IsII.4 p ncipui clerk of the OrAngr ; aa��'j; 1R �.. t!�l �'' sds r F •T, with,.which is combined the `` + i'k �r ;�, 1 �r `r ,y!r�•� q ,; NWS"PItES.St a news a' prin'trc! p per.of general circulation, ' � published in the C!t p 3 , t ; 'l Z .r _} aunly.at 0 Y t+LostA Rfcga, t� r� NfltlCe'b+lr"' rang :H ar:Cn CaUforisia. and that a 'syk4 a. q;z tiF:Ilt�rt�rirlG7rnrs a . C •�� "^r•.s I )ie�j�;r}it X% T �.••�k��' ���g A' � s ,��� �� •� kV i ,1+ which copy;Attnchrd hre(6 is tnie anti ca ��� toX u !j ropy/ ta'printed Grid publlehcd in the Costa gip. to "NewpoN ilrech• IiuritingtorI Beach F`n Mesa, t,� � � ,., �,� �•��� �# j :� ��;s + !fit � �,, +1, ` `, � t `IrNin+li t t etntAin VatIry III's� � !, 771 1 + ' h Sou h Cnast comrnunitic� and 1' °w t r tM i,1 ,t. I3enCh :tssucs ai Said newspaw for at;una , i�` �t�t1;� }� , rr� 411Q it�."?'� �,.'�t�� t',,r�'ft" ��„k t.'` ++"•Ct! �, � k j. ._ .,fir ��" `F; �.`��. listlexa1Q nt }+:;.. #'�'� t + T(4'i ,� y ytt VtJ :t f�� ` ;( F . , 'S� + rt j ► . }' �j�r ti' 1 •,It �,y,�fjLs%} d*� ,1 r of :i�� :1}',��'• i�it,' "� r ,7`� ��+.rry •�'� ,r ..`- �, 1 , :t ����t a' s$.°l �a��dr.'6 , ,+'i.`.,h47 i�rt,'s `.►t i > .-•i��•i••'�•.i ,,, ��a'S,�dr ;�,�j-ti ss , raJ a{ F�! , tZ� S' f+�' �a 0. `1 ( t , * s r a ✓i `t � ' r t�p AM X 4}L#jh l ♦� �' R�7 i ' 1 3}} p �r f� ' 98 $�.[ \. �`, .it•!`�•�. Rt -'•� ".�,.�6}r ; 1 f s. ,Ek �. •7.. t ,7` t•( 7",'1t .r�' t 'y,.j "{, �: 4 „ LY' ,jZ '�'T} '�,� '•#c ..y+5 r n + {1.`�,�5, 1 i.;i I �� �,y,, ir• �1�� �:�1144.. �'C• .ac. }r-l.,i •��•�• a j't �"�"` � ����?'S ��•'�'}� .:,':t; :<; �, r�..,� �3{,'f}�,�;„ � ;.�'�y '^),,. `:�'{�� ''�^`•'�,(.��yt�, te.' rtFt b. �. e�'K!'4` ` .td{? r�l�Ab�'iiv.�� ,} "� ° ? }r�,�;, r Vy'd • +�,,�(43` rNIF tTyT 1 'S.L• Mr fi. . •i L ;+! �tif tyt�lway' f t s :, � ---• 1J8----- •J� �rr►Y�ti�i, , �;t,r��! ` R`t.r• �'� �R ���.r"1 Vy`v '�:��, ��• Q•"� '��#', �1�'.i!' i '� '4',.. "�C,c i .',• t if �''rer'Y;,t�� t 'r .��..t. 41 mi �,CI• •�,t >.R ��+ }��' � y. N. ��r� � p'1 MVW :a. � r 198 ":� " i{ +.1.„ fl '�' t,1 •. s 'y' r' i ` F« a•��,. 1 f4 f9FOgoingclare; �tier penalty off e pr' u � :�'.����•� `}�;��; ,�;`'S; , � i ;�, i,i f� . ','�F.� is true and c,o rY, that the , t�+� �T�; z.. � �►� � , +4 ` { i,.R�jc R + i _ s ,+,�,, erect. + �S• Z�t � xf„�x�+�+.��i���,�'s+'t� ,��1,�•%� t''- `6•t � �` "' t �7m`� '9R •� iv Xectltt' Nave b t"�•1r•�, {{�; '.� *i E c tit �'�' i tc t W ` at;C+DSt�!d b�1 er G a ;A�:�<,'.���r�s,�;'=r�''���;�M c��7�'�'� +�:.�'3� r>t��}, �, •t� � ti �' ��t ` tifarnia. '•1j .�t4 r �. - ?.. r ;' ►, i 4� } + t {! t •ii`,RZ } jRit,S �U J t'tgik � �" j� { ," `, r., , : �'" 'r• l.,J ' 'i1 �' .R ZL �'•3- '+-S"+�` 'Cgt d� r�;��4r• gz ��� (in;ltUr@ • •.�� .-l'}�2;t''{���" s r' k"+' �Y r _tf r .4� ( w .. '��, {f�. - .� ���$ ,.F.►aT¢t�t..-,r+ t Z ,.��t{S{F,.��� J�' '�a''�"' '111 �,•i -• . r i � � Z � 't��, 'Y•. ,'S'�' 1 .,�� 0.0.TSi,4,`i�1;R 5'� :1r11 j�j� �. 7.. � i'�• 'S `r z s••�� �E�se� �+�, � 1t' 'rrtis�,���•� . :1� ,,����s •,,�� r 1 •� ` t � 7i MA, I '" ht}rirSi1�tit. ' :,.h Rf! !s �'*3 ' �• ��.'l< 1 ,. .._0PROLIF OF ~ �tt� ?q 1 PUQLIOQTi Ion •t•n nc�y,,taa.ayx•,t v.r t .�t t 't a y i vi i t \ r ! Huntington Beach Independent •� Daily Pilot t Arry Publish /I— G-�D NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING THE COASTAL ELEMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council' Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 17th day of November 19 80• for the purpose of considering the Coastal Element, a proposed addition to the General Plan Which indicates the kinds, location and 'intensitie's of land uses in the City's coastal zone, shorn as the shaded area on the City reap. Discussion will br held on linvenber 17, 1980 and may be continued to December 1 , 1980 and Derembrr.. 15, lgao. Co'Ples rf `sald pill ►used .Coastal Element are available for review in the City Clerk's, Ofr1re All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their . opinionc for or -14•11nst said proposed Coastal E1E t i•i rthg� falarw rtprr may be obt fmw frog the Office of the City Clarke 200t1 Ma�4n 5trvttP. "t.mSingtil" ltsach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-S227 IM1i i� 1!; 1i�rr CITY Or- ifUNTIKGT BEACH Fy.- Alicia N. Wrnivvrth t City Clerk r�Z1?'�7+'f.I+tt''w'.+...r"„"",..w....n.+a+'nnl..w.....«w.-.,...w.«.»,......,...fir•...w+.. •.-..+Mew.�..�\Yr.-4 }"tt:1J":1YMr..owM+'Y..t:a 4rYLIYNIixMIVFlt.JJ2. 'li.'l:liwf ti.'�tw',�'iti�.'S7.L7.L"T:lti.'41"'{a'aYMlM1M'awd ` , �: �. j•. �k •tt,�{t�±5t` � � ?� � � � �iT 4 f +� 1 .'.2,, •'a'. �tl• t• i �C• � ^" � ,�•�. Pi Lo r• Number of Excerpts t • Publish Oifce LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTIC"6M=1;,1Vz"13N0n that a public hearing will be held by the City of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering -r �►, /" .� T" �f �'��-r�►l+.+►`,r"- eli -l.,�{�.e'�-C^•��,�> �`..v' ../� r7!�f i �^c�L`•f ... t::yed:C��-•�j��rLih'.t'.t-Ct�'Cti? �,'" 'e, e .•i�/..Gt�r•:f��yc,.� iaL^�.i'-ram-• c�-J! ��',�'` �t� f':�''�: /..if_I r'C.C.r..w;:�;!_1.tc••t•.� ��+4�="Er�'`�.t`%t�.,,.i t �1f` /c.j�1<!-!!'..1!;�:G•' •/�f �4,� { ;•'-eeC�'� ✓'tf�c"G �i .tt';,r+ ;�`�+••;�/`�,c�.-?i!a!+l L'14 Ye), • I Said hearing will, be hold at the hour of .111 Q p am s t on i tir r •. j ',�►r1- f'.iJJ*7 �4)r in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and 1t `express their opinions for or against the proposed Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271.�}� DATED this daffy of CITY Pi4N"fG-eeHi-jGfi39jt 13y r''•'�'",_,;,"y1 K^,"^",'.,�- ". '-r+�nas'<f�'i<tT lit':,.:X.'.�'if;s�Ki-...suf..;�c+.•w-... ,..,.< ._�.: ... a.,+ ::4 ,..e .. ^+ , `� ''.. .. *•, I,i +•t�. ••1'1 a•.L'.,, ,�,.. ,+►..k... •l.J:• .."`.,.'�I`tp'a';`i�,+ "�'J^r'.;,'�'a�e.�_G�. �. 1E.,::}.{.c.t,i,Kt-r:��.•v.t't x�-`,,;�i..�S•i'���..^,.�iH.�,'. i, • � t �,gryy f �glj��.ja.( .,��a; y t ♦, '•s�'� �3 � � i ! .y� ','rr� ,7.+'} ,� .et'� •�t �'+y$t}t'rY� �}� ,y� ; a'�w tom'• �S� �� � 5�L•"t y , ��l ir''47T.,� �, ��.r tfr� 7' i� Y j't�•'l/ •!�� fyr� �i � ' 6 � �t ��i �1 �• J �''•�+ {+y� �f � + , ' •* ���' � �,�.� 1. ��r�. %1 +' ! a ,r� �., �s! fl�`� '� * ''�s y` � ;� r1'r��� �1�'`�,i. f �� i�1 y' '� �% f' i � � a J, ti ! R. j .t t►°. +, e 1� y�/" t � p. I! '�. t '1 � L ►.+ t',y +.i3'{ M , t+� w{t � M,F�(rt' 1�, }7, T 1 ► i .F rJ,f I 1 f 1 t• • I 1 n^ M , ' A ! • 1 1 • L a l l 1 I 1 r ( i l f AS7 47 .1 rr ;y •rn 4F `F i,,' >.J i l '4 b A r (. 1 '`+ • t !t' y: t{i t" : t v,l.y, r ] .� +, ' 1 f r ] ,r xYa, S � x { J ,� ;� � 1 e1{ y'yj �+ (}iil r: ,31 j,'ti �'�d , w �J j "'i .y '.1 + y, •�f + w. yl j { A+ !� " .\ }��h%7'�f �.1 r S, t}[ 5 .•, ) It p�1 < t '�rt • ;Il. ?••- r4 ,!f •� � y.• �,.� 1+.. r► 'J,7itf�1-r4� ,•.�f LY'�• Iti��1 "li.,,� '� ,.,t' S 1 .- { ,, � FI y.4. •1. � �r } .. n 5 �„1 �. y•.». t t.. � ��;4 `fir„•L •�.., ..aS ^; �, � r •f, f 1.,+ 1 ; `� 1• '%� 1,.h '7�f t _ t" , ,te1 x•.4 1 .', 4 r;1 t.4A ` ,ht`�,1f5 ,l+k 1 T + t•f {i. a.. ..y�1.. �,r L A; �r Y�'+. .a f• t ` r-. '�I Ir ,• ,,qa. - "^,� a " ti ' � ''�1a <+ arl i irr 1``'' + � t + {�'�. ', r} l +.4 �'t 'b�+�i a'{. �) , I; � µi: 7T tir�'.4 �°.51� i1 + t 1 +r ! t• r kt?l�l F*� .. {.y ,' L4 , ' ,. Yak I�Tnf,' ;• 4 ;�:{ta4 „Uef F� .f�rw r h >•L % �ltw i� �a� t . t* } , y .wr /` ,� K �` ��Id4,t d,.+G 1f > �'+' t"; 11'17+ a."+• ;r.ii�, �l• d � t !. k :a � r 14• r + -, 5 7t re � 1•�� �"�,y 1/ir� e� �� � } • r"� � fi .:?r '1 1 �r ti .: •� � �� � r- i r � !,]�f/ �� �}b ��Rr r� '� li v,` f� 'cif i r� � 1l�Il' +htyrlyI �Atia 1 A1lltil + r +t �iS. c .I+�Y•10g1'a'•1y'11� ,+ t !`" � -4 r �4' + .sit. 4 # � r �y� � by 4,111 ,.,,t;Y'r� I 's •••� 1•ti �!�' t•' f1 �` T 4.a tip h�a�n,' ;�' 1^3 1� 1 ,�} +.�� ' •,.yr•I ti31 i` L.'' r�l� 1I L 1 *!,_ It F .4 �i� •� 511 y5 �• � 11 v ...A1 a d t.�' t 2+L r,T. lr 1 ? 'T1Y,,�"�iq. 55+•�.�.� y4d ��.,�r ��1,>1�frl t�'1'" �?l't`� *t + 14F trt�. i}; i�� •� L Krh �y{ ;�'.'F/ tky.; li 111 a* S."«�k 1f : f,t l �t, +•�; il++t :i1f''! t:i rh ri 3 ta. A .l 4 I t, w ,yt t4,e�ti�,1(�'rt {{ ♦ 1 )ti j}�)a', � Irk Itrl !dl'7�.y 71\e[LC�IIt �f ;�K, � (t,,�111�? •1irr�l�.l�yX�f` 'M ���11 ;��wLL1 P .+ , ,��� lr'}+{'��k� ,�yij�•t.>w q % 4 i 4��;`11UKk ��•,Y, ,r •i` , ';!Ta. t , ,` , 1 ti ' fi! r 1r;41 1 I ia1 s+ tt l •� t a w{ 1:lSR�" •1' iA S±•• �r t '�r t� } k ► {r . � �.'ti0.+}���{L�1 tl.� },� t 1•, ! r� �• f u ! �`� ! r •'�:f"y ) '� '.• �i ,4.•t�` t �',.+'�!►; •► �if f,)'+t t«1 t .�k� 1' r r �i`_ 14i r 'qd4 �1 5�1 1 ,�h} +�•y. y 1.' ,� 1 ' r '41 ����1: 4n'�7+t,�, f�,r � �1�1 �(�1J� �I+kjlll {Yi�t• � ��S{y]�. .� {J � ��j���I Hi 1 ,+,� �� l��l.. t �t1' ,.�, '� ,�' +•• �� �i' ,r,•' t�'.'I'Wti'' T4 �� � �t"+.%i1{*�..�1•ifi���Y,,����T.�"tA l��1 l y4 ' �A•L+ +� � e� f �;i t 1�frt +��,�► �r•„ n►4'+�7't''`'`«].hi.,�:.,'' �t,,,l . j� r'..",..SG��4�* } k ] 'i ' 1 tt t �J 1r 1.• "� ^"( +� A� 4+ .. '' 7 �' �1 C' � •,q r+1�1 4 1 )• "'�, i i S I�YI 4 ��• -v�l y ( y 1 �1} n ,�,'�� - 1.r1 ii't�:4•�.y��,y�,,�1�t!�t" �!`��\ �ti�"+C`,�',}'i I''�" 1 (':t+ I ";��y�',7i�K :,�t�,��yt I��Y.t�ti�t. 'r: r V 1!►��'��„�`.X t�"`;2�: H�"`�... � iiS.t �;�� ft M.�.++:,}�..r•,.,ti ,.y'1).i.lwt~:`�w(•tM�.k"i'7L, ;,1•,,.+•Ir•"•fir., •r rr t „;.• ,S ^''`into .t.c ._.. 1 4r r ; 1 I�i'•i�� •'!t,. i!1•:f,�;'jl4,)! .Y IL.:. .T- �,w r .1.. �ri s• i , r" ��•�,'� ;x' �L 2t� S'1 r� ,�.�Y �k „�t'`l4Y•�S� r��t� ..�M1��.�, i�ty 4 •",'!,�{r �S.��k;�y ��+1 •�t,���1 1 f� �; •� �'•���{�� 't" 4 y�• i.+t i � Y �(1 1 AG,7�' �. 1t t jt r ,. •i � / , v� / 4�.� !� a ,. ,(r�3I t. �� }, ;rt .t����� � •t n ,� TF 1};i 1..S'�' �t F 1' � 6fi", � •� � .i1 Zak fC S4�_.�{a r ,T: 7,. �4 ,. ►, fit 4}i'., `r t!71.• 'i' � 7 �J F7r J J J. I t i 4, 's 1 1 I f F h • • - it I f • • • L / 1 1 t • • • • fa • • • L t • • • lot • . i 41 • r • s • • • • • • it • 1 • 1 • • • r • Y- t r , 4 i F {t =may .i!•t •; r tp, 9.r': ) q t �i '1/( �'-pW +ti r y'..': ,+ Y,F �:Z. .riA , )._,� +. •* , y. •.'7. ! ,,. }, •1' d�'''S.�bL�.(S+ ��?�, �+tt���fi'1.�,y,ar `•., lf ..�. � Il�T1 d r,:+�. '�{ f. a,y.,'{.l ). o �,y�4c2 5...5•�Ai.i}�;:r ht R )Z:! ;'1 °�. a i 4 5,Y � a, 5 r ,� � <rI'•' ( [ at\5 y i.r t r .y�1 tw: �.• S ,j �h.f. � , r�`t♦1�'�! �4 � t YS.',� f r! ) r! r r� "�' I8 5 +. o 1 ; ,dl'' i. ft� �t,�+;.r `3r .I,h •, �"a:i V '1t. 1, '�*+ '} k . ♦ #t'� r 4 , :�`'� 1 �F d,• '! •.� q 'l;:Y kk1 , � �, 1� �> • !i� ,t 'tir� ? r� '.� l•'` i �. 4r .i` 1:1,1 1 ,.7 rt T , ''^5;' 1. F' �tF ) �1 rS{��l•^ k{ 1�' ee'lll f t� 4 } !h y'S y(t�.�l ,1 y h ,�'h ,�4 tr { � (1 �n r 1 1 � �' t ,�• r r ki. -� YT • �1" ,•,:, ,, M. ,1'�1 t'+, jrrjit,[; n '�' t /� i�, 1511^ �' k yl/� >C, 4 t 1 t 1 11 } y•Y�" t .y� '(31" r��Y'Ib 7.'14L lu{11 !r}�{'- � ,1� 1 pr�'� 'R•':i i +, i,` R- f �4r `� y r�i('#1' x•,'r� t. '. �trt.•�; " 5 .iN F r''.t ! r:'�' ,, yk -tt, 1 r•, �, • ,�v'�s5 ^'+i• 1 �t,, ,, tii)�l�tM�yl1, . .0 1 h I � t 1� ,�. ,�,y -'f•�1 11•y;/ 4`, 1,' 4 ' ,. �• �.,1 l }11 1'S'. , � ,, ,r N'L ' • '� � � �Y� ��r� •s 111,4 li, '� r*T l,t�F� li t�.': , i/. •, 'S•, �11 1� 3i7' 1 , + ;(4 1 ! �� }4'+ ,.�' + } 11 t ?,• +,` �1 ,j' , tll•�t' ~I, r,, * , ) i�, , ' �7'1. !y� , y �. 1 R.�F. ..f, 1'1•1 ,.t, +" 11iti ;� ) t" ���(7p{ ftJ 1#�� ,+ { 1 .w't,SttLj ,� ar 5 l .# �.(. ,`1 1 •, 4 f f 1 r - art ! l t ,i + ,r � 54v b � +•} s +t 4 �5 i '1y l ,fy+ i'. {"�1trr1 u,}t 1.1 n } h!*� 1t� �. titk•i5 1 'fit 15 S�'t 5•,t t ♦ r� '• ;, ,f 1 4 4 t4 C `fy,�1 11 }. t{ b yl � •1 t Irj F� t • �• 1 ,.�:I� X t, f r 1 +eU'",�•� #. S 4 �t5 ♦ !,�•^,' 4 t Srq 1 A) i;� }��4 v� t�+ A i 'tir >,' Mr'.t�` t{� 1 •14k , ?'�' •F � 1 � 1 � �t MM t 1s.�.�k � ��' 5A� y kh�. + �t M,•.: ri\' vl` 1 r 1 tt 4,1� p }. ., IK ,.Jpp 1� 1 ♦1 �V 4�,,`�7,1/{ Z r it '{t �tV��V ft it�" 'l.r �1 F�C�t� r1�r� •'•\f#�yrT��R � � !1 A\�tY [, 4r �4�� V.t��`�" •M.y.�r'4• ram' 4 J (•1 '4�'t��k1 i•rX r v 11 , j k q �' , •1 � 4! 6 i�r''t ,,ti t�,,t5tk t� � H •r 1 � �� 4 r I�� kt �� lxl� ty,.�, !"1� rp�`•t� 'yy 'i. r' ! r•r ! ,t 'F{i J� � �ii"11�4 } • �j9 ,s >ti'FrW•'��'�.. y• S t�� r�� ,�1� ,�*,�� �,�' ,��.'t/T „�.11'�"#j�� � } t►r'� ^"_.k� SP, , .LtI it h ,tr�� ,�1 �..} # '�1 t ('..1.: �•It1� , 3 '• 5'1 r t •.G p ! •7� 1� Nt�t 1 + ,� � 1� � .• �i,INr�i, . t , r•�. LLL�.�, M1. , �,,.F�Ic ` ��jj '+♦ •ka.•�+, � w�• f . +� u.''F � �rj' av � lt �2f tl�i+•r111,�P) {'., Ca Si �„/ 1+?4a• ,�V « ! '�, u '�r� 1 W-�r'�• �I .h�� ��x�y"�>���fr^r� � ��;�•?"���(�'�i��'"' j I Nil, 4 �,� �.r�� •1 ,�.:tA�,l,y � �� �t+M.. t � tirf T�L' c y t t..,, },'r'.i f ) d'F t +t" 1t �.:� ��V � s•�' � t '�� ;1,. ��, e ¢ �r.�? � �'`�+'• j r .#,#F�F•F, � ��j' rn � '�t�r��,' '� r �:•L� �� t 1•M ,'{-s �,� + ti"4� •4�'ttt i t���:a�;��,�!�'1uK�tit1 si,rr'1 tY��l14a G' t ,. kj;+��,r��,. ('.:y��,� �? r � ��• �," �;1•{„fj',1f� y�-' 1 + I t��/R.11�� 1�1 t v . 5; !, S�+f r{r.���F 5� •tt�+t' .�;.1.4 f'," .,�? .., t 3 'p�'. ��I � ):'.11 nn a1 Sit r" 1 �y♦Li�C�ta. 414t f: • • .' Y r,.v. tt( V "L.. •( 1 I , 1 November 7, 1980 Mayor Ruth Bailey and Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 ilonorable Ruth Bailey, I am a property owner in Downtown Huntington Teach and I . urge the Council to support Option 93 of the Local Coastal i Plan. Option 43 has the hest flexibility for a well planned ord+'�rly development of Downtown. The economic return that 1 a well planned. and developed Downtown can ..give the City, will benefit all the citizens for many years to come. There is no height limit in the C--3 Zone now and we encourage you not to impose any limit at this time. Please support us, so that we can get on with the upgrading of Downtown. f. Yours truly, t �• t f Name A ress �i bi.r{Twy/.n.ri ww.. .. ..... .. V.•.s. .•. ....s.. r.m.p ... ... •. .� eM. ♦ • ......-...w.l.•... .y..�nw.�. `.. ' ..••. e1. y..•..ry xw ♦rLN•• Y-.':iJ`Y��1� J , huntington beach developmt.A. services departIment STAff ED ORX TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: November 26, 1980 SUBJECT: COM14ENTS ON COASTAL ELEMENT Attached are continents which have been received on the Coastat Element since the last City Council meeting. Any additional communications received before the meeting on December 1, 1980 Will be delivered to you at that time. r , I I i i a i i • r A-FM-23d L� °y7"l'•M1.4.. 4�E•T.•r— .. .._.. ». .. iryf,.,_' : . .. ... a :�:..;i.:, :. �: .`'S y ...,y .....oaer.r,•RM1C` ,I of C+tLiFO hU. � EAMUHO Ci. Ouvn,. WORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION ' = COAST MORAL COWSWN i L ocrm wumvAro, stmt vie a. sox 14W .40 t+AOL CAMORMA VM1 13)$laws (tlq it"'Wa November 17, 1980 . 4 Mr. Jim Palin, . Director of Planning Department of. bevelopment Services City of Huntington Beach F. O. Box 190 2000 Main Street HUNTINTON BEACH, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Falin: W ara pleased to note the progress made by the City of Huntington 'Beach in the coastal planning process. We concur ` with most of the .changes this Planning Commission has recommended in the draft LUP, however, some of om, previous comments sent to you on October 7, 1990, have not been ° addressed. � Additionally, the followin are a few comments on.�the recommended changes made by the Planning Commission to the ; City Council. We hope the City Council considers these � comments as well as those dated October 7, 1980, when taking action on the draft Land Use Plan. If the City has any questions or needs assistance during, the public hearing or in the revioion process, please do not hesitate to contact us. 1.f Yours very truly, SO i COAST REGIONAL 'CMWSSION Dmvid. 'lei h, Deputy Executive Director do/df Enclosure .• . fF.w..-tr.n n.w.ir.n.r....... .. .._.. ....., -... _—.+........^w.+.+w+Rv...M.YM�". Page 78 According to the Coastal Act, the Edison Plant cannot be designated as "coastal--dependent use; however, this use gets ►� priority•over other developments. 1 Page 221 According to Section 30222, visitor--serving uses have priority over residential and office uses. The City should demonstrate that it fulfills all 6he visitor--serving needs in the area i before a "special permit" is issued in the "visitor-serving" .. lone for residential/commercial use. Page 146 Alternative number 3 - High Intensity: According to Section 30108.5 of the Coastal Act, the Lard Use Plan should sufficiently "indicate the kinds, location and intensity of land uses .". The description of alternative 3 fails to' do sa. By deleting the f references to height limitation, the maximum intensity of use cannot be determined. We understand the City will prepare the G Specific Plan for the downtown area; however, to get the LUP certified, the City may ouggest floor area ratio or use some other method to indicate the maximum allowable intensity. Page 165b 4 Suggested word change r-'- ". alterations necessary for development of public trails stabilization of 'bluf'fs shall be permitted consistent with i i Section 30251 of the Coastal AcW, Page 165 According to Section 30213 of the Coastal Act, ". . . 'housing }! g opportunities for persons and familie3 •of low and moderate income . . shall, be protected, encouraged, and where feitsible, Provided," Therefore, merely retaining existing mobile homes will nct meet the requiirement of the.Act. The Commission staff. �f"i{ 1 ' -... ..__. l:l[:++FC..i1�;': i.l'.'.•,;;:'.:s.1,Y.'^+.wnr.c�M•M..r.\n1r.,w..e«w,�w.r,.w«..�,-....... 1 ',t(. t . " r appreciates the C:ity's efforts in preserving existing mobile home parks which have been co4sidered low and moderate income housing. However, to be consistent with the above referenced nection, additional low and moderate income housing should be . provided where feasible. Therefore, in the Coastal. Co=i.ssion staff's opinion, Policy Number 15g and 15h are both applicable; they should net be treated as replaceable by each other. 15h To meet the intent of Section 30213 of the Coastal Act, afford-- able housing required through permit process should be within the Coastal Zone. However, where it is proven to be infeasible to provide such housing within the Coastal Zone, off—site *mitigaw' tions outside the ,Coastal. Zane may be appropriate where the � alternative sitin'S area (1) is in close proximity to the project site; (g) is in close proximity to the Coastal. Zone (i«ee within to walking distance from the area within the Zone). y . i t 4 v c t: • •ik I0 t f ~ , CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER•DEPARTtiENT COMMUNICATION To City Council From Paul E. Cook, Public Works Direct( Jim Palin, Dev. Services Directo Subject Proposed Policies in Coastal Date November 18, 1980 Element We are. concerned about the two policies in the draft Coastal Element which were added by the Planning Commission at their meeting of November. 4, 1980. These policies are recommended by the Citizens Advisory Committee. The first policy is number 16i on page 166 which reads as follc.+s: 161. Maintain the number of existing traffic lanes on Pacific Coast Highway within City boundaries, including, Bolsa .Chica, and en- -courage the provi.siois of safety arrangements for pedestrian, vehicles, such .as landscaped medians, speed controls, and enforce•- ment, and oppose the . ssix-laninq proposal in order to support alternate forms of transportation. n Proposed policy 161, although properly stressing the need to provide and support ,all forms of transportation, precludes .the City or State . from pursuing needed improvements on P.C.H. The pulicy, appeairs to be contradictory to efforts to attract quality redevelopment within the downtown area, including the proposed visitor-serving land vses. There is currently sruf ficient .trraffic data to support the justification to establish 6 lanes on.. portions of Pacific Coast Highway, especially in the area from the Santa Ana River to Beach Blvd. Traffic volumes in' 1978 range from 28,000 vehicles. por day for the downtown area to40,000 at: Brookhurat Street. projected 1995 traffic volumes based on the Tranaportation Demand' Model, not considering increased traffic re- sulting from changes recommended in L.C,P� , ara 49,000 in the downtown area and 70,000 at Brookhurst Street. The recommended .capacity, for a primary arterial , (current designation for''P.C.11. ) is 30,000 vehicles per day and 45,000 vehicles per day of a. major classification. Current .P.C.H. configurations (4 lama tindivided highway) combined with anticipated higher traffic volumes caa only Lead to ,more travel' delay and an even higher, traffics accident rate. , Pacific Coast Highway within the -City has a current accident rate of almost three times the. State-wide average for si.milar, highways. Proposed policy 161 appears to be short-oighted for such an important long range. plan. Obviously, ,as traffic increases. in. Orarige County, we must: piomote. all forms of transportatiu:: and they.must work .hand in.. hand .and support one another. Transit and highways cannot individually :sleet the transportation needs of our citizens. A balanced efficient { comb1hat:ion of each will be needed. i \1..^ .i\'f rM1R •.. . • .. ...r. ...w.. .................. r..•r...ti w-...•..f.ti..�.r a...I.i •+/. � 7 S:�'•,r f3:'lf�f..i.I ,. .I ....•. ................ ......w..... ::c;..r.t:::';gL'S:1G.ila 4eM'S:��i i�:i�'.v .•1 'f r Memo to City- Council ' Proposed Policies in coastal Element November 18, 1980 Page 2 We would recommend that proposed policy 16i be modified as follows: "zn 'order to meet the transportation needs of the areas within the Coastal Zone that all forms of transportation alternatives be promoted. and supported, and that existing facilities be upgraded, as necessary, to meet current and future traffic demands, " The second policy is number 161 on page 167 which reads as follows: 161. Express preference for the OCTD's recommended location concept at Pacific Coast Highway and Lake Street. The center on that site should be designed nearer Atlanta Avenue and related to the Orange/Atlanta east-west circulation pattern. f The Huntington; 0erach Transportation Center 'Location Study 'preaared by O.C.T.D. was presdnted to the City Council at a study session early this year. The City Council asked for more input in certain areas. Since that time, staff has been working with O.C.T.D: on making interim bus layover improvements which will alleviate some of their ctirrent concerns. . rt -is the concensus. of the nanaaemont staff of the Development Services and Public Works Departments that theadoption of a precise lorim.tion for4 transportation center 'in the downtown area is premature. The reasons for this opinion are as follows: 1. The. Orange County Transportation Commission has adopted a transit corrcidor to supplement Beach Blvd. The precise location of this corridor will be determined after considerable study in the future. The location of this transit :line may be along Beach Blvd. itself; ►'': along the 4bcandoned Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way oast of Lake St or somewhere in between. The loozation of this transports- tion corridor should be determined be=ore a- transportation center is entrablished. 2. The intensity of development in the downtown area will determine whether or 'not 'a transportation center is needed. If the downtown ' develops as a rather low density village, is full transportation center- should nct be needed. If the downtown in densely developed with high' rine and high intensity uses, a transportation center may be ,necessary. 3. After approval of the Local Coastal Plan, the Downtown Development .'Ad-floc •Contmittee wants to develop a specific plan for the downtown area. The appropriate location of a transportation center will . ' bu considered in that plan. 4 'We requost that "policy number 16h on page 166 be the only policy refer- ence' to the downtown transportation center concept. PEC:JP t jy �..� �r November 7, :1980 mayor Ruth Bailey and Council city of Huntington Beach 2000 Hain St. r Huntington Beach, CA. 92b48 tlonorAble Ruth Baileys I am a property owner in Downtown Huntington Hek!h and I ,urge the,'Council to support option #3 of the. Local, Coastal - Plan. Option #3 has the best flexibility for a' well'planned .orderly. devolopment "of Downtowne The economic return that a well planned and developed Downtown can give the City, Mill benefit -all, the citizens -for many years to come. �•° There is no height limit in the C-3 Zoiie now and we encourage you not to impose any limit at this time. Please support us, so that we can yet on with .the upgrading of Downtown. Yours truly, t t - Dame , F A cress Ss:. F ! i �,y�,�.�t-rr. .-;S . ,.=y,4n«+Yiss.«. ..; F •-_"...,........«w`...«„.....,wr«, .. .,.«.. . .««.«.,».....-.....v..,«nircww...,:.w+r r.n`r...+•..-.....*».«r+tr•HF�r4i.«`•i$:.?f�',1.7�1i.1: �I i I I 'I November 1, 1980 Mayor Ituth Bailey and Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 MS'tin :DC. 110ntington Beach, CA. 92649 Honorable Ruth Dailey, � t, I . am a. property owner .in Downtown. 11untington Beach and, I � urge the: CUunail to support. Option #3 of the Looal. Coastal r Plan. Option ;13 has the best flexibility fcir, a..well planned � orderly development of Downtown. . The oconomi.c return' that a` wu11 , planiaed :ind developed Downtown can give the City, will benefit all the citizens for many y(!ars to come, There is;,no.:height limit� in the C-�3 Lnnc now a,ad we 0nc:ourage you not to impose any limit .at this time. , Please support us, so that we can get on with the upgrading o f Downtown. . Yours truly, ' x kt III a e . A ss �t r�. •�l t � I �I 1 t � .; •+ _. .......- .. ..�.... ,.......-...»..+.....•-.w.....w......r......+.•.a ,._•.w...v.t>u........,w.....-..r...._......-...._..�.•-.+...-t.._........ ... «,.,y...r..'rr.1Y7;A+".:I:A.Mw.w^.p+.w�a ' REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL "ACTION S•abmitted by James W. Palin Department Development Services (late Prepared —November 21, � , 19$p Backup Material Attached El Yet El No Subject LOCAL COASTAL ELLMENT PUBLIC HEARING City Administrator's Comments Approve as Recommended Statement of luue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actiona: C. STATEMENT OE ISSUE: , The City Council opened the public hearing on the Coastal Element on November 17, 1980 and took testimony on the area of the coastal. zone , between the north City boundary and Golden West .Street. Additional ' public testimony is scheduled for December 1, 1980,and� December 8, 19.80. If the Coastal Element is adopted by the City Council on December 151 , 1980, the Element will be transmitted to' the Regional and State Coastal ` Commissions for certification. RECO��ENDATION: . 1. Take public testimony on the coastal zone area from Beach Eoulevard to the ;Santa Ana River. j 2. Continue the public hearing to Deccmber� 8, j1980, . and j December 15, 1980. AN6LYSISs • ' The next: two public hearings will complete the sehedule for hearings 'on, segmerts of the Coastal Plan. The hearing on December 1 will deal with the area from Reach 'Boulevard to the Santa Ana River. The hearing on December 8 will deal with the downtown area between Golden- west Street: and, Beacih .Boulevard. , To aid the council in its review of R ).he three downtown land use alternatives, . stsff has developed the attar? td "Technical Memorandum" dealing with the physical and visual implications of each alternative, 110 �►ra t • at!t h Page Two v FIIVIRONHENTAL SZ•ATUS i, Local agencies are not required by the Coastal Act to prepare environmental documentation for the Local Coastal Element. After adoption of the Coastal Element by the City Council, the Coastal Commission staff will prepare an environmental assessment. FUNDING SOURCE: None required. ALTERNATIVES: The Council reelected the recommended public_ hearing format at its ' meeting of November 17, 1980. Respectfully submitted, t a If. Pa in, irector s Department of Development Services Jwp:CC:Jwr:gc A'TTACNMENT: . + Local Coastal Program Technical Memorandum r r r 't • i• fR{►(t �T.•^S�.%-.'�,!.Si-in+vv+..ar.,..>re..rfc.4T1.^,S)i!'r 7iv4'rx:l.-. ..« .�t::wniir .. ti...�+.. _ _ • : f}('�l�i .. 'a`. ..t .,.G «.�..:Y� ref'.�K,•itrtx:�2'.y,v•1i;i..�i;...`iL:C:.�.Rx.-.:n.:Y-'t rfttY•aiYwrla•.r-ax�V(Cie`tr�i.�;.�aS+n+:+rrirt'«Lj2! fir l,+ }! 1 ' , - + , • �,• 1 1 r � r � r Spe cia'I Report Local Coastal r t Po'.... Tecri r"•, ical Memotu, mmuni RECORT OUTLINE I 1.0 INTRODUCTION ? 2.0 ANALYSIS OF ALURNATIVES 2. 1 Community Attitude 2.2 Economic Feasibility 1. 3 Ownership Patterns and Consolidation 2.4 Part:in(I 2. 5 Vistia.1 Amenities I . 2.6 Cirrulatian 3.0 CONCLUSION 8/80 ' f HUNTINGTON SUCH CALFORNI,k PLANNING DIVISION 77"Lty1�.�'i..r`'i.ra>i;::��.v:' }� :.i .... ... .......... .,.. �ti�.. t'�P� is,r C.F:, .:7y{...iiv..ia�:.. +. .:.✓.t.^tt»i:`;tGt+a"7w++wt'rSNi.Y:T�:w:SS' <7AW;w , t. f 1 t/ONI nRAFr TECMICAL WIDRAN" A &ackgro-aO Report on the Ihm ngton Beach Coastal Ela=t August 29, 1980 f c • i Y• TI i• a. i• f` S'. �r 4 � ytf.`,:•f.^.rfSlAR'eMaww.M^N1f11)s-ti'4/��2%`.ti.1t.V.'w.►RNtiM'y�-.7:S..x4:t.y•.C•'.i:7Y•��.:,5'L`sl✓3:.:r,�..:Lii., t' t .y .•• ••• � 2 s�., ',�,f�s tiH%e _ .a a�Ct'.... .:rw•:a %t�`."•-v aY {+r.'h'ii T.�1�.df.�.'4..:.a;fihn.,»;v4:':,+t'7d.:a P?i�•x41" ��..� � � 7; r i d tntar��� tivea 'Provide addjana11�s $14 r 11QN devatot'ed to ha ttu'e° of a bin o� of meta• u�tde conge ies& , tt ytt 1 Memo h to choo..t Constnl[�E Dg to tht' 0-40town a tal ,1 1.0 1�� tee Cca p n �n Beach �, to tuc the pot 1, wn. g d 1S106 to tha� bed► deveu�t�, intA the 001160ha Qownto ur°Po9 tiv©s 1i�'vatou� °�'� natlye meets at use tar altarn°t1vCd alter vur ar d m1 of ead'mnCa datZile c o9ad by ant! am t dt ndltY an s n the 1htC cnp 11r'ntlan Gh , In{eng, je 4�•9, . the l dttf event a`aat tn►P © al-0 Div ttve 1� d 'vtth p's d hu a�A�.h �.ef4 vte�tiat Zn�yphy and t'?tjeaOnce °o� w111 tte b�RhatC,anesat }het$ tt` a� ate nt s t cwc%' nt It SO tt�e d um me o t119s mem`' r�i r lS patklCCOS 1 Ct Co`t�1•M o f tidal 5�t�ti %.arc.1hs.a� lv' tt dct�ted b mitt 5ttj+� as n n<« 'nore tt'r�tiv a a� tt� ac1W� move 1'�1an. anti+ rAfJ•i SQ'> . 4yR jil�i .�i at a a� • ` :Yr.w w ar4Anyy.ttu"-'„' •s" .. D I` f 2.Q ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES The three alternatives developed for the Goldenwest Street to Beach t3oulevaM area reflect three different "chatactero" for the :canstal;,ione. Altemative One is a law 'Iritensity prop6sal designed etc retain. the current village .'ambience; it Is based on a genaral height' limitation;of three. stones. Alternative Two, amid=rise proposal allowing buildings of up'to six ator' les, 'is designed to create a more urban character Downtown while 'orlonting commerclal nn d visitor sv'Mng uses toward the beach and Pier to ciapltaoiiz6 on their tourism potential. Alternative Three is a high Intensity plan permitting building heights of up to 12 stories, conducive to a busineus and financial center. Several Important lasues must be considered when evolunting the feasibility of alternative land uses, and intensities of development- in thb Downtowns area. These Include community attitudes, economic feasibility, ownership patterns, and conwIldation potential. Other parameters . such as parking, .visual nmenitites, and circulation are also important. Individually and collectively, these can pose significant constraints on the amount and type of development that can occur Downtown.. Successful implementation of a pr"ferred land um plan will depend on the extent to whits these Issues ere-adequately addressed and mitigated through the development of zoning and/or a specific plan for the nrcn. Tito following section discusses the issues Identified above, and where appropriate indicates the varyinq Impacts of each on the three alternative land use plans. WV AWA A'!7`h�� .'e ZMw Sf'Y+(fvw•1/I•YsHanAMvpn•w.r NF aw..w..w+.w...a w..Ww..<.a. ..r.,n,+, •1+..+ . .. ..a• ti.. ....n. •».•. :� . w`i.Via..... ^ ..i.11.Y't:i:.... wwl.CH ::12S,j! •i:n7[ r • i "'+++see ♦ 4 ♦i`�Y j ' S • • r . f t. Y + 4• S [Duavv f 2.1 Community Attitude Attitudes about what function the Downtown serves and the character It should project vary among city residents. In an attempt to determine the community's desires for the future of Downtown, a special census, conducted In January 1979, included n question on preferred development plans for the area. The tabulated responses to this question are presented below. Question: What plans do you feel the City should pursue In the Downtown Response: ' Number Percent t ' . . 13,482 22.7 No response 'r 119935 20.1 A revitalization program with nmpha:sis an restoring r ' and radio existing commercial uses. }} upgrading 9 9,379 15.0 No opinion +.r _ 7,663 13.2 A revitnIUntion plan with emphasis on upgrading streets, lighting, utilities,•etc. tit 495613 7.6 The City ,should net pursue a redevelopment or a revitalization plan, 4,347 7.3 A redave6ppment plan with emphasis on residential development. 3,858 6.5 A plan with emphasis an commercial > daveelopment of roglonal significance. : ; 3,703 6.4 A redevelopment plan with emphasis on tourism. 59,368 100.00% Although almost 39 percent of the households surveyed either did not respond to tho .questloo Ur Indicated they had, no opinion cn the oubject, a large Y' • proportion of the 61 percent who did respond favored some typo of revitrllizatlon of the area, presumably while retaining the existing commercial uses and low key character. Those favoring revitalization comprised 54 percent of these who responded(33 percent of ail households surveyed). Of the remaining four options, 10 percent of those responding believed the City should pursue a redavelnpmcent pinn with an emphasis on tourfam, It d' percent preferred a redevelopment piers with emphasis on reglonni commercial development, 17 percent favored a redevelopment plan emphasizing nesidantlai (kevolopment rind 13 percent believed the city should not concern Itself with rillhor revitaliz(tti(xt to redc(volopmnnt. Thin three groups of respondonts who fnvored rumn type of •rednvnlo�jment nevauntod for 33 percent of all hrwtaholds afferiny Ern opinion art Downtown, and 2ha percent of all households surveyed. 4 -, t L• 4 � r r ! f. ♦ M t t I'0� �ra� ww.w rv�rwiw� +fF maw VV Opinions of the residents of the areas immediately adjacent to aiwotown did not differ markedly from the city-wide results, with the exception that a much larger percentage gave no response at all. One of the problems with interpreting the data from the census questionnaire Is that the questions'concem'b)th type of land use and"plan' Implementation methods. It is not clear, fot example, if a respondent Is expressing a preference for revitalizatlon as opposed to redevelopment, cr a desire to see a particular land use (i.e., commeacial or residential) increased. For this reason, the inferences drawn from the survey must be extremely tentative. Nevertheless, the census survey seems to Indicate a fairly oven split within the community an the topic of the Downtowns future. The survey may be an indication that the community %w not united b0iind a particular course of action at that time. 'Additional public input concerning the Downtown arra has been gathered at regular meetings of they Local Coastal Program Citizens Advisory Committee: As with tlis 'responseu reported in 'the spacial census, public opinion In this sample has been mixed. The concerns expressed through- this public forum have been addressed In the alternatives or noted by staff for incorporation into i later zoning and/or srpecific pinns. Many Downtown property owners believe that, higher Intensity development will be -the key', to rejuvenation of the arru. Alternative Three has been structured to reflect this belief. Other citizens'have expressed a desire to retain the small beach town ambience that has historically pervaded the. area. ' This Is reflected in Alternative One. Alterantiva'Two represents 'a mid Writ between the two . other alternatives. In 'evaluating the alternatives, consideration should be given to the desk-us of the community must be blended with the needs of the region, the Intemsts of the property owners, and the economics of the marketpince to establish a d1rection for Downtown. f 2.2 Economic Feasibility [k,sign»tnd Innd uses are only guides to permitted development. The market for those larxt uses actually determines what is developed. Both market feasibility nrA City fiscal concerns should be c:.,nsidered In designating land uses and Intensities in a given aren. Market feasibility includns considerations such an consumer demnnd or marketability, ncepssibility, building cost!, and competing regional uses. To a great extent these factors are all Interrelated. They are discussed briefly here in order to pinpoint thit. salient dimensions of ranch. Cmsumer dernnrut for variouu land use types are typically assessed by 'n profnssional market rimnlysis, a task which is beyond the scope of this report nrxt of tile* rnn.-ital f.lement Itself. 1K"T 4a j.','1. ,u:11.3..Y'.•y•Ue•:.w .-.. .. •. ... . ........ .. .[1 .... .• s....*r ... .. •: r.a-.rto: •.. ••.v.. •...�.codw.�r •. 1 s t ' {j • L ' r # Af f . . ., i + A number of generalizations, however, can be discussed in .light of a.staff survey of 'pertinent literature and the .City's past experience. Traditional market analyses evaluate the population base of the area from which a development will draw its patrons and determine whether or not the necessary . economic support exists. Some market analyses also,use surveys to assess the i likelihood that people will actually patronize .the proposed project. This type i of study also Is concerned with transportation accessibility, the regional ! , ec(momy, and the geographic location of the area. Accessibility,. implies the ease with which a development can• be reached. ' Existing circulation patterns, the availability of public transit and parking facilities, and the cost of transportation are all consider itlons that affect accessibility and thereby affect market feasibility. Visitor serving and tourist destination uses may,be more dependent on the attractiveness of the area and the available parking than on close freeway connections and, convenient i access. As visitor serving uses increase, they become themselves part of the tourist "draw". and reinforce the vitality of the entire, area. Attractive shops f 't•" and destination re"sort• complexes which take advantage of the,beach location i 1 will generate additional visitors, who may prefer to :jro:vse and'dine rather than enjoy beach or water sports. These types of uses may not be deterred by the lack of an adjacent freeway exit; however, convenient parking at reasonable ,:ost will greatly enhance their viability. General commercial uses which cater to regionsl shopping needs, on the other hand, should have convenient freeway access and usually prefer d location with o 3�0-degree market area from which to draw patrons. Since neither of these assets are available to the, Downtown , area, the likelihood. of regional commercial +interests locating there are probably small. In aeAltion, existing j regional shopping complexes are located:within a.,reasonablu distance (l.e., Westminster Mall, South Coast Plaza, Fashion Island) and have the advantage In most cases of freeway access and acres of free parking. ! .1 I Other types of commercial uses, such es offices, may feasibly be considered ; for the Downtown nren. in many cases, the amenities of a coastal location, , Including views from mid or high rise buildings, may outweigh the disadvantage of distance from .the freeway. Also, as nearby residential uses increase they i may encourage utilization of convenient office.space. Adequate parking is an important consideration for office uses, particularly full day parking for employees. As visitor serving uses (specinity shops and restaurants) increase, sa may tiv. desimbuity or Downtown its a location for premium office space. Residential hind uses nm presently highly marketnblo in coastal locations, and thp. (ttinnnd for coastal residentinl properties shows no indication of lessening do+spito hirrh building en,ts. Although residential rises are not n priority of thn Constnl Art, wnll phuxied residecitial davelopment can offer opportunities to in•rnuar me, r"'ity's nffordnbiu housing stuck and establish a population to sq)port o0wr tieneral r-ommerciai and apwinity oatabilshments. in addition, t wall-designed residential development can add appreciably to the visual quality i of Mi constnl arva. i i i I J (1 •;! s .p'♦ t � +1�� �1. ` { � E7 The cost of developing vnrlous land uses will be affected by City,..regulations governing land usp intensities, setbacks, bjilding height,end parking. Mid or high rise structures provide greater square footage than.low rise structures and the potential for more economic• return. This Is particularly- true for the coastal zone where. land is both scarce and ."valuable. Stringent parking requirements may offset this economic retum by forcing 'more, land to be devoted to parking lots or structures. The availability of City-developed perking facilities would Increa:3e the Incentives for development of visitor-serving/tourist, commercial nr office uses. Competing regional uses should also be a consideration In designating land uses and intensities in-the Downtown Area. If the area is zoned .for a use that is prosently being fully supplied in more convenient locations,. short.:term development is unlikely to occur.. Regional commercial, uses, for, example, could not reasonably he supported ' by the;. Downto%�h in the • near future. Changes in residential and/or,commuter,patterns in'ay make such a use feasible t" nine.years froin now, however. if immediate revitalization of Downtown Is important, the land use designak(ans chosen should be those for which there Is current demand. In' considering Downtown development from the point of view of-the City, j different factors assume Importance. The City must be concerned with Its tax base,. the cost of providing City services, the economic health of the entire community, the visual and aesthetic impact. of Downtown on visitora " and { citizens, and , the character of the area which the community desires 'to establlsh and maintain. The City recently hens developed a computerized fiscal Impact model designed to plroject 'costs and raventees related. to development. The ".three proposed nikernatives are being assessed by staff using this, model. The` results will enable a general comparison of the costs and benefits In dollars of-each 'type and Intensity of use proposed for Downtown. t 2.3 Ownership haftorns and corlsnlirfation New constrtirtirxi of a' tttiantity and quality necessary to revitalize .-the l)ownto%" ' area requires that reasonably large sites be available for dovolopmenit. The- existinn pate ritct tit streets, land subdivision, and property ownonji lip ref►lramnt lnctjor nhstiv•lt,s to ttvi formulatinit and Implementntinn of nt devrfnl►mmil ttlmt for ttur nre�.a. Tttn f�atvntnwn bioe�kn wt�to subdivided in the ' t fmrly 1' 00N, mool ),)lot east in n rr,4•tonquInr qr!d protein interspersed with 60-to-110-ftx►t •wilt+► tclrototm. " ►;I?pical +"ity hinckx , ensure 350-by-250 feet, corh tinted or tri9tx-ltvd try' 15-to-211 lath Wide alleys. 1$► 1111• IN-re. Downt►►wl► area hrtwPtin Sixth and l_nke Stretet$, public: straits Solid alley!. rn�e!tnint for rat poremil (if gi nss lurid area, leaving .just under 36 net acrest of devt-innnhle Inr► 1. WHItin this 22•block area, there area a total of 267 ; rm: orded lotr. with sinarly 200 separate property owners. Excluding the 3.6-net lure alit civic Center site, there tire an overage of 13.25 late per block and an ►�verrtcio lot sirr► of only %345 sq►tare fart. i_ats urn generally only 50 feet wide; some area as marrow as 25 feet. x '`�y'.(1.1�G�+�'`�'n ria..1.Aw1R.xs.�.a i,.......y .t.r.h•T...-.rv...)ti s.rv?I....+. +. i., i.. ..r ... • ....w,.. ♦ tY.•..l .f .�r.r+u.ra.Y...v.Y�..,bI.1.Mflla:rR i'1'fIV.UNI MSn1�kK1 IRMY S l. ti l ' t F , aL E L 't r. rsCj V19 The prevalence of smell, narrow lots and fragmented , eawnershlps . in the ; Downtown area and the off-street parking requirement,of..one space .for each 506 square feet of dross retail floor area now effectivaly.• preclude the development of buildings in excess of one or. two staries. The number of ; unconsolidated tots Is greatest along Main Street, especially, .in the block } between Walnut and Olive Avenues. While many buildings remaln from the City's early dtrys, there has been very little new commercial development In the core area. The process. of consolidating the many sma'IVAots may take place through private'efforts or n City .redevelopment agency: Prior, attempts,, to use redevr�lnprrient authority in the Downtown Area hiiVa been unsirccessful due to } a lack"of consensus about whyt. dir'ectinn n redeveloprnant plan should take 'and i the opposition .of local residents to I the City's .use of such authority. Ttie possibility of using:thx inc_il6ment financing for re'developinent•�io now,severly liriilted due to the-pias3age of Proposition• 13"and lts,llmit m Increases In local t property taxes. In' the wake of these events,,ttirr City has taken a'more#,passive policy, of encouraging private. rehabilitation, property consoltdaklon, . and. redevelopment, and has.identified Downtown as a target area for rehabilitation � I assistance loans through the federal Community Development Block Grant t Program. The City Council has`recently, taken additional actions to encourage private t. revitalizatlori/redevelopment efforts Downtown, 'approving funds ,for new street lighting, trees, benches, paving and other public' improvements. The City hones that these actlorhs.will encourage new, commercial Investment in the Downtown ' without the 60cessity of using redevelopment authority to } consolidate lat... Effective pralierty coitsolirlation is tlie� ,key to successful' Implementation of any of the three! niternativels,' particulnrty 'the higher-intensity plane. Even ! Hiviltedt rnnrdi.lidlation for prirkiriq would considerably Improve, , dovetop}nnnt polmitial in list, Onwntowii nrers. The ability of the Downtown area to nol-a+ridiiod all, ijinnih-r intensities will require the adoption of strict i. d eveliipinent rnntrnls to rdrqulate building height and orientation, .traffic. nc iirrpts, and the provisinn of ad equate parking rind open space areas through zoning or n sliecific plan. Parking The; rivnilahility and varivenience of adequate parking facilities has tin importrnit impiwt "on both the feasibility and the ecodximle vitality of r t Downtown dldrveinpaient. Lack of sufficient parting or its relative Inaccessibility r.;ui (I(Intrihdtte significantly to, Inw, levels of patronage for ! t'nmMerd_int or visitor serving enterprises. Conversely, If parking is known to } } be readily nvaiinblr., users depdrndent on consuiner mobility will be enhanced. � I •t t y � 4 i Automobile parking in the Downtown' Area is presently ,provided through a combination of on-street curbside spaces and private off-street lots. The rrmjority of commercini uses are located in older buildings which do,.nat provide sufficient off-street parking on site to meet current zoning requirements, Much of the available on-street parking (see Table 1) Is restricted by meters and/or time limits, even in the residential blocks. The City,'oparntes a 41-spnce free lot at the'corner of fifth Street and Orange Avenue for short term parking (two hour limit), but other private lots in the area are used primarily for beach parking and charge daily rates. A number of alternative methods of accommodating increased. .off-street parking are available, ranging from .self-contained parking facilities In subterranean lots to consolidated street level 'tots and'abuveground:`structures. Because of tide relatively small block sizes (2.0 net acres) and the high cnst,of land, It appears that one or mom- multi-level aboveground structures;would be the most efficient Tway to accommodate any,-significant amount of three, six, or twelve story development as allowed in the three conceptual alternatives. Several Sol tlinm California vitins were surveyed to. determine.; appropriate parking standarils . for downtown areas. In the cities surveyed, ;parking requirements for downtown comiiv reint districts ranged from one space:per i 250 squstrc fart of dross .fluor area to ona space per 1,000 square feet. The � + City'x';currant requirement of one: space per Sot] square, meet of reWl floor spnce .in'C3 districts.falls in the middle of the range rind Is used as the litasls for de'termtritng estimated regttired parking in each of the three alternative Intensities. For the purpose of,slmpli Eying this analysis IC.will be assumed:that a majority of the required park.►;g for a bint:k.,would..be provided thruugh-uap.Hof:,an abavegrounid structure. .In nrder to keep building costs reasonable anii'piwWile the r43ace neoded for. ramps and turning orens, It As .assumes' the minlimm feasible structure would utilize half a block and..provide parking for '100-130. cars per level with a varyintl ntiniSer•of levels. Allowing for a 5 foot .setback from the sidewn' lk, approxliviately 45 'percent of a typical Downtown block ' would be needed for such a structure, leaving 55 percent to be devoted to building rind open spnct3. The rotin at tilt coverages for parking and commercial building area is the same for a nch alternative. This moults from the fact that as the number of cnmtnerei:�l flnnrs inrren. , :rtdrditlruial pnrklnrl requirements can be aveomiwid,r od nimply by :ird+tinq levels to the pnrlcing strot ure. The number , (if prtrkinil lovtels ertletire d rnttgc:a from two levels for the three=story ti niterwit ivte, lot Intir levels for the sit-story alternative nal six levels, one of whit•h nthlht ht- too adttrilrtruncd, for thte twelve-story alternative. tort, irn-rt►t ivo IN, City or•ttltl ltrovitde wrnrltl he the tdeveloptnemt of municipal trrrkitu it twit i11(w n were volinttlidate d, g T , 'l I• � parking for t to 2 000 cars ! (assumitiq ttrur -if orien above rlra do rind ante stdrterrationn story at. 400 spaced pnr lowe,l) t•t:trlti hi? jmwitdtetd, frveintl significant amaiints of buildable area on the mnininint) hlorkti. tiff 9 1 4 __T'ye .it... .J.fx::J. rr.r.-.r. —.......«... ....w.. ........ .........+..... ..rr,..... . .,xt..a.J. 1.. •I• r. ' r.x.4'..\. ...........,,.n..w.v+.Yr.rw+wr•+.rww.+.wr+w1-•v+V.+iab.�'� I 7 { 1 + f* { y+ t S S ,1t,- w l L. . t • • Z, t • PIN 1•i f • � � t r � : Z � � � •t • i J � :• S i 1 1 1 tj i; �M 1 } ,o i. Ij ft� i. t' ,i t•$'.�..t +I,n"r! }^ ++ 47 Cr =L C�•� i a�;r�' �' .i�-, .� ..�i�i Y'}� t'1' '!{ yc;t. v � Y� + 7�*Y Y+ t, ? ! '1 1 .}'.� t�, �''� �'" f}�� � ��` ';���,��t���`,C��,,^�' ��� �' � •� ;� .i#•a �� r.4 a � �v �.� t ��{� �. 4 ��� �� t����.,����{"�`'�� "trw� .�1 .� � + � i 1 �� fir• +v., 11 '1�� t � .k, i�i4. t '� •r ',f � � •,� 'T�� `+� � � � ,� t ;y � 4 5 'r. � ���:� ,t���., � �,�;h,��,� � �;yi,. ��"�1� � ,, � 't� i �i.r_' �,�i •;���. ��� ."�. •�t 'ti � ► "� , : �r��.�� �`�•�. � .+j',;, .��, ,,J, ..�. �t MORE st ''.. � •,+ '# �t',a} 1'i ` Iw r• ' � �,.',`t , 1. _,�� ;G+ , .'•�iC t t "�, ��^ f t �kN + - !.�y 1 it l ♦h'�'• ,� i.� i •++ tyy { {•04 �, � �� ,�j y � yr • � ,��• J� 4��i �� � ����� 3 •' ����� }���� � � � ���. ��"� ''� � },1}� .�,� Lit +�•� +CZ��fE. •li �� '41�,Sh'.� �:�� ��'f�L•����?.��� '�q+.,+��'•���y.;$�.+:.f yi . . .��.C.i$+ItJ� •;'h�`�i�4 ,_�Mlv{�t:�ti?' jVV Another possibility would be for the City .to take the lead in forming a parking assessment district to provide nff-site parking. Participants In the assassment district wo►ild then be able to devote all their usable lot area to buildings. Tho Implementation of either of these strategies would require further study to determine their cost and feasibility. 2.5 Visual Amenities Visual amenities include all the elements which contribute Wan attractive environment and have an important role In creating the desired character of a given area. Although npearance may be thought of as a function of individual taste and a concern not to be dictated by goverriiment, certain aspects of building design and siting influence the entire neighborhood and "care properly regulated _through zoning ordinances and/or a specific Olen. These Include building heights, set-backs, lot coverage, and open sprace requirements. Alternative One watild. prubtably result in to low profile Downtown 'with buildings of generally uniform size oriented to the street. A specific plan for this alternative might concentrate rxi Implementing a "unified theme in the area aml making the bast possible use of existing open spwa. • i Alternative Two may re cult in mote variety ,in'the atreatecape and sk'ylinet with�some tttll buildings of greater bulk interspersed among lower buildings j sited cua smaller Iota. Ground floor commercial a^tivites 'would still be surest oriented, but tipper levels could capitalize on ocean views. Helghts,,ivould be stepped .bac4 from Pacific Coast Highway to maximize the opportunitles"far ocean orientation. Concerns caddresaed in a specific plan .for this alternative would include the relationships between lot slr.`e, heights, and setback requirements. Alternative Three also assumes n varied skyline with bulldings stepped back from"Pnelfir [':mast Highway to maximize view potential. The greater bulk of high,rist: tstilldintis might. be nomewhat of(set by Increased open space between structures.-r tines nttrnrti-July de:sitinerd pltazas'or pedestrian areas. This could be achieved by raquiring rlr^eatar setbacks as height increasus. As In Alternative Twn, n sg)e*rifir. plan wnttid hntance lot. niie ngoinst setbaeks'and heights. rtteere► art. stther itnpricts of mitt anti high rise struct'tims which should receive atterdicrt itt Ow thoveloprttent of zoning ordinances and to specific, plan. The shnrinw pattr.riis of trail huildings rnn adversely impact residential areas. Reflected glam foam extensive glass pars in modern buildings and nighttime itttrrninntirxi of miimnerelal or office structures need to he carefully studied ttod mititiated. The. vinonl Impsart cif parking structure+ must aim be thurtihtf dly itl:uwtod let minlrttl7o ttrinttrartive qunlitles. In addition, In each of tho thri4, :alit!rruttive+z, considt!rnticm mast bn given to preserving the visual vorridor aliviel Mai,, ► met cartel to enhancing views inland from Pacific Coast Highway. 777 .r-,w ti.$.T.S'Fd=.-.:Yl1!v'.t:.iM..^4 h..kr.yw,..,..«.,nw...� nY..r... . .....w.`r.....a... .. . ..'. ..f.P'...( ..s a ri'L...:L. ...c..i. ...v.•r.w.••.r '1�.'.. .:i.if/:14M11)Y"s....YM M+i.�^� A 3 f + 1, } C + r to •, �`, x 4 i 2.6 Circulation This section present.. a brief nnzlysis of the anticipated traffic and circulation impacts associated with, development under each of the three land , iise alternatives concentrating m the Downtown area between Sixth and Lake ; Streets. The analysis will consider existing circulation patterns and traffic ' volumes in the area, estimate the number and distribution of„trips generated by the proposed land.uses and assess their Impact on the existing and planned system of arterial streets and highways in the Downtown area. + Tha.C1rrulAlion Plan of Art,*riaf Streets and Highways utilizes three arterthl cla,ssificAtions based on street width and capacity. Major arterials have a planned strew width of 120 feet and can accommodate an average daily traffic volrime'of 45'000 veNcles. Primary arterials are planned at 100 feet and can accorntnotf,ate 30,1100 ye.laicicrr par Clay. Secnndnry arterials aro planned ' t 80 feet anti run suer:minodrate, 20,009 vehicles .per day. Local, streets 'and collector, are not shown on the Circulation Plan because of their small siiQ F and 136e ix►rnww, 'hut are art important part of the overall circulation system, particularly in small areas such as thn Downtown where local streets'carry a majority of this traffic. s; In assessing the relative circulation Impacts of the three aalternhtives, certain i 1 i:. assumptions have. been made regarding development in the Downtown area on:- existing circulation pattems: 1. Emphasis on the fallowing arterials in accordance with the cxsiting Cir6latio7 Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways: � 1.'•_ a) Ptacffic Coastal Highway -primary arterial i� ta} Attnnto Avenue -primary arterial > c) Uke atreoL =primary .-arterial d) C)ram1r, Avenna - ner aricfary arterial ; s V) Fifila %reet. - .swontlary nrtnrial t {' Alth(m(fla Main Street �i eat denignFated .as nn arterial and Is ale raga ,a innior crirrier of through traffic, It will continue to M11:011111arid;ate i3Oweer) 10,0DO and 15,000 vehicles per day, north of clrsintlr Avenue.?, equivalent, to a secondary nrt►arial, �'. Ilr:vrirat+raarrd' ail .4"1111-,mall rraaprovements ,along Main Street, Includingt. :r1 iaa+ulif vset i+xa of f 1w :im-ti+an of Main Street between grange Avenue `.i: Cato i'noiric rmist viitlta.vay to a one Bane, one-way street with 45 • alrtilrrr lairrkiraq tua t=oth •i:icai. }:� • tf 12 k 1 e. ' y - i'. '�'' � �,€5>z.�f: 1�'9Et1'.t7� ,� 1�.'t't'.NiCt'� ►` ��5�1�'�` ���i �� 4,i .e t`•tia}"i�,� RI�.,a,�C� �yqkhl �� t�� �� +¢ +4TR[� �' � 1����i ��; ' Y, Y�� .jj, {tisy"��Ti a}t. 'yy t i b=t, � `. :i.} t�, a ��`X_}l � ��•' ,��s.-.���-. �i�ar ''�' Fwt f`. ''t!T l� '�1..t...� �a!b 1' �i�:� � �_ ��4Ktt .. ! W. + ' • j t+•:+ :' r 1 3 1 Is z • 3 .44 :.1.: • S 1 t • i • T • 3 • ' ' • a • 'r a. a ' •l . ► i • J I • • . �• ► • ♦ 4�'Al a � :«• • 1 • ► • 1 ! !to 1 1 • '1 ill a 1 �����;t?��� 'k��t' 11 t(Y �1 ; i .pti tt� t�j�,�'idd•Asy-,.?.t l fi'��?`�(; Ca:�tit.+;•��• i v !4I tk'�?. ,'gt`1•-1y �' L'1 x�+ r+t�c`3}`ii �' tR «7 �if�,'� t'�y�,y+ ,I t �1 �r f � y `r�ytd`r1 lye �` . 9 M }.�T f7Y(? ,,iy?,.,�., � Z .rt•', i, �i �.\' FJ�s.tt�. �`CL i.�•.��• � �e� `S` I''V ( �+'� �� C. �'t' ,'�� •++ �' � t,[j{, t� ,� , �' k i t + t � � t L • �' � � ���, 1 I ,.�� �t i ."1 �� '��, r�o 't'1 x�� � � ���•�t Ih � n�� -� 'K . �' � � .i'' �+f tK �,#� d ,� .t� .�, i ` ; � is��,, r,, fjj�'�,�.� {<"� t<� pt ,� � ,r y,'1 ;� �. ! ¢ if�i{{tK r :,�t ',�'�'�,�.�, t `�, '► '� � �,a Y t , t � 1 4. l �F• { Y + . / C y7r � 3 ti � t rt til t1. i „< � �, � f � 7# •I ►'�� '.7 i i. � �y 1F�i't �,�(W'�(i• t '} 'j'2�� j : '' ' x' 3 , T 'Ta" �('4t' 'Rr.Y+� a �,. J� ♦' . f{ r .,.�• '�.1• `t x '�:r�L�hh+y.�,t� j'� • � � :y �.` '` � � ji ,�{ +y{� t + �i YL ' ''` R�il�'. 1. �•�����, iiTT WA . NI th ] , ,• r +` 't{« 'rl.L1w1Q}.S"%i1':#"iCfJ 'x, i y`. ��' a' t t ��ai tLlittrtt4'.I !`"�1 l tx�t'l.Ma`, "►'Y«f. .r �ti .i '' +� r a �y� � + ;� �, ', � �+ �� � • �` � �. � tit i i VV_ _ Office/ 10TE/1,000 sq ft GFA x 00,000 sq ft GFA 600 s Professional i Library/Public 10TE/acre x 5 acres 250 } Buildings { 7,3l0 AVERAGE: 117.9 trips per acre i .i If the trips generated by existing land uses in the core.area are distributed ,4 evenly. , among the streets .listed above, each would accommodate approximately 11500 vehicles per day (this figure may even be high given the many streets In the- area and alternative routes available). This, represents only e1raction of the actual observed volumes on these streets,--Indicating that much of the: daily traffic is not related to Downtown uses, but merely posses through the area en route to other destinations. The existing arterlel.system exhibits no . significant; problems in accommodating currant trafle. in the Downtown area,, with,the!exception of congestion on Pacific Coast'•_HighwAy during she summer when beach.use is most intense.. Agaln,T local`traffic is not a significant- factor;,In this congestion, The recently adopted precise 'plan of alignment for the Atlanta/Lake/Orange, intersection 1s. designed to facilitate a +� parallel east-west,route alone the grange/Atlanta corridor to relieve eeasonal i congestion and accommodate local traffic an Pacific Coast Highway. ' The ability of ,the Downtown art.a.rial system to accommodate substantial 1 Irrw:reasas In ,traffic Is, .however, limited by, Lite inadequate rights-of-way of older i streets (Orange Avenue and Main Street), recent reductions in the widths of Lake . Street , and Atlanta Avenue, .and the desire to' protect the predominantly residential character of the areas along Main and Lake Streets. ' Palm, Orange, a nd-Indiannpolis Avenues,,and Delaware, .Seventeenth, Lake, and Goldenwest Streets have all•been ldentified'as having.insuffielent right=of-way and'pavement widths as•required by the Circulation Plan of Artecial Streets and Highways. These deficiencies range from312 to 39 feet In actual pavement width, %Ncih.line n profound effect on these rirterials' ability to handle present:. and future volumes of traffic. ln..March 1979, the City Council deleted it 1/2-mile section of Lake Street between Garfield and Yorktown Avenues from the Circulation • Man. ` Subsequently, the ultimate right-of-why of Lake Street was reduced lram 100 to 90 feet between Indionapolis and Atlanta Avenues. The-, combined effect of these actions may discourage rise of the arterial; however, congestion may Increase an Lake Street due to the narrower street width. Main Street presently carries the largest volumc:of traffic of all streets In the Downtown area. However, heonuse of Its narrow right-of-way and align"meat through. prr-dominantly residential :arras, It will be de-emphasized as a major carrier of incrr.ised traffic hum future development. The arterial designation ! for Main Street was deleted from the Circulation Plan in 1976• when' the• �. current Downtown land use plan wan adopted. Traffic moving to, from, and A a e 4ri taYO1�MU 4 through Downtown wag to be.accommodated by two north-south, corridors - the Cothard-Main-Seventeenth corridor and Main-Lake corridor. The deletion of Lake Street north of Yorktown Avenue reduces the viability of one corrlcior and will probably perpetuate high traffic volumes on Main Street. Finally, Atlanta Avenue was reduced from a major to a primary arterial in late 1978. The actual street width of.Atlanta Avenue varies, however,.because`,of Indonsistent dedication r`esqulrements. Unless older uses along fitlanta Avenue nre recycled or the City condemns additional right-of-way, the existing hatileneck condition will remain. fFrom the preceding discussion, it Is apparent that there exist a:number of problem with the arterial circulation notlw rk lh the Downtown ^area, which are exacerbated by the volume of beach traffic In the area' 'each While"these problems, may not he 'fully evident, given ,exi5tiA4 ,levels. and patterns of development, they may act as a constraint on planning future types and Intrtneitles of development In the Downtown area. The,. followlhg .sections attempt to illustrate the re'lai.ive ..voWmca' of daily ` traffic wlalch would be generated by each,'of the three cahceptual- liod use alterfiatbms In co' hiparlson to existing'conditions In the.Downtown`cares, area, tiYlth each elteMaitive, a "worst case" situation is used, assuming 'develop citesrtt will rsccur, to the most Intense level allowed. in actuality, this level of Intensity Is einlikely to materialize, or may takes many years to do ,so. ALT!?RNATIVE ONE This atlte3rnative3 ' Is ,dominated by 21.5. acres of general commercial Was oriante d' to Main Street between Frankfort`and Walnut Avenues, fisnked on eitheir. s)de .by ,prpdomineintly ;medium do'nalty ,residential areas. Based 'on observatliin iif exlsting'Opwntawn use..s,' nppr*ximately 35 percent of the,gross ; floor area of buildings In the general commerciai district would be occupied by ! •ufflce/orofasslortril uses. The first Mock: area .,along Pacific Coast •,H16hway f between Sl h Street,and take Streets, approximately 15 acres, is designated for vlsltor-serWhj commercial uses In addition to a 10-acra nrea on then'east side of Lakes Street. r' The ge hinal commercial area Is anvistoned as a ,Community-oriented business district W serve the estimated t5,OOO residents of the Townlots and.Oldtown t►olght c►hoods; becnusa of its unique location and cttearacter, •however,` the coinmcrcini district mety draw from ri larger area, Including Sescliff and other t sur'rounding',residentlal sites. Using traffic generation factors 'from the City'ss , transportation demand model.an'd prnvious traffic studies for the Downtown area, the (allowing r>,smbesrs of trips are anticipated. 15, '1.;..`:.:.tia:....'.rssrr:•atwY,twa;.M. „?4 ......,....«........,.....,.,................t.. ..»........ -... ...G:,r 4^eria e d,a..'Ap;''.YV,ry♦M..,�. ,. r-..,..•rxs-a .^srw Y.,r.wr•v..++.. nvr.,!' .. 71�` .. ai r� ': �: a LAND USE G�ENERATiDN ('ACTOR TRIP P ENDS � Medium Density 5.2TE/r.JU x 1501JIAcre x 10.7 scras 1,460 i Residential j High Density 5.2TE/DU x 157 W 820 Residential }} i General 20TE/1,00f1 sq ft GFA x 227,500 sq .ft max 41550 Commercial 1 Visitor, 15TE/1,000 aq ft GFA x 300,000 eq f 'FA 41500 Commercial Office/ 10TE/I,000 sq'ft GFA x 122,500 sq ft ,' _A 19230 Bulldin i ►. Library, 100 AVERAGEt 202.6 trips per acre 12,660 The gbcva table'pregerit9 a very general estimate.of the anpcipeteii'number of t trips ginerated-by the:mix ,and Intenilty of hind usee propoh&' by Alternative ' One, using the following assumpticxist 1. Because, of .'restrictive ownership pattarns, lot ., sizes, u.-A parking requirements {6n6 6ff-street space per 500 square feet grass flippr area), ' a maximum of 50,000,0iim fact of commercial building area pair block vias assumed.,,Existing commercial davelapment in.tha, core area epn.•lea ( 'fro m 10;000-40,DDD square;'.feet' per block. EfftiAiver concolldation, or ; provision,.of ;iricreesed`psi�king via a parking �stcucturo would Allow Or f granter utilizstlarn'of TowniQt'blacks. ,. 2. ' Camriiercla! traffic generoticui'r�itaa`uaed'nra �eamewhnt fu+aroi then the i. city-wide av$.ago based an 'observation of existing traffic vaiumes. Projected traffic'frorn'tlevelopme, t under Alternative t3no is about 72•percent higher than traffic associated with existing Downtown.uses,,due rrlmarUy to _g ; 40 `percent incr' as , n general commercial and office area and tha`tripling,of virltor carving equ,. footage. . White aiclsting"uses cof;tribkAe .an 'estimated � 1,500 vehicles per.d�.: arterials in the area, Alterns�tivri Dni3 wiiuld raise this figure: to nppraxlii gtely 2,500 velilciaa per day, agMn assuming an oven distribution ainang Pacific Coast Highway, Oranqe and Atlanin Avi enues, and Mein and Like Streets. Since most of the Increased Wfflc 'is ,elansratcd by i visitor serviat) uses, Pacific Coast Highway and Atlnnta would be expected to arcommodate proportionately'more traffic than oth r ,arterials. Local traffic, to and from tho general butineas district will continue to utilize t sacawwvnxwrarwerwanvtawram�nra�raef oar�►tas+iw��►+awx 11I i 16 1 �.... n..... ........�... . . .. .. .. .. - .............. ..nw.�,r...n,..,......... ......, ...�....._ � - ....._... ....r wuayVo•ra.`;'.t}.aF�...w. 1 Y 7i � E. Main and Lake Streets; however, the conversion of Main Street to .one-way traffic will piece Increased emphasis on Fifth Street. The. realignment of Atlanta Avenue•to directly connect to Orange Avenue Will 7 pfobably increase truffle on Orange' Avenue as an alternate route to Pacific Coast Highway. + Development of visitor serving commercial uses along Pacific Coast Highway should be debigned to, take access off intersecting streets such as Lake, Second, Third, and Fifth to minimize disruption of traffic flow on Pacific Coast Highway. ALTERNATIVE TWC- The second alternative Is similar to the first in emphasizing ,the Main Street commercial corridor, although this alternative expands the visitor serving area from 15 to 30 acres In the Main Street area. Residential densities In the surrounding areas have also been increased from medium to high density. In addition, tho 12.6-acre area , between Third and Lake Streets has been 1 redesignated to allow a 'Mix of office and high density residential uses. The eipanalon,of the visltor-serving commercial district and additional offices In "thn core area is intended to re-establish Downtown as the social and economic focal point of the community. In addition to integrating hotel, restaurant, and.office uses into the commercial area, a height limit of six stories is proposed to allow mare intensive use of the land in the visitor F commercial and office residential areas. i ; The projected traffic volumes generated by development under Alternative � fTwo are as follows: I LAND USE GENERATION FACTOR TRIP ENDS High Density 5.2TE/DU x 30DU/Acre x 14.8 acres 20300 ; Residantial t j General 20TE/1,000 aq ft GFA x 150,000 aq ft GFA 3,000 Commercial Visitor 15TE/11000 sq ft GFA x 400,000 sq ft GFA 6,000 Commercial i Office/ 10TE/10000 eq ft GFA x 360,000 a1 rt G A 3,600 t ! i'rofesaioncl f Library 100 AVERAGE: 240.0 trips per acre 15,Jlock In Altemntive Two, an Intensity of 50,000 square feet of commercial t area per block Is again assumed for the general commercial and first visitor•surving area. However, because of increased height allowances, j , 17 .rarsm�Yiti't.[lLtA2t:`,�. h,�:��.+7��`7+.��?•.�.s+, z�..°y . ,.::�rT '�.'�...F��'� .n:4.ts..�.4..:td,.isv+...,,,r".: �d'•1"�cv::,... o �.t. s'� '4:.s.. LDQC�Vv areas wore lncreased to 60,000 square feet po. block In the visitor-serving commercial area between Walnut and :range A'lenuee, with a 2:1, ratio of office space to commercial spare_ Yn the office/residential district, a 1:1 ratio of office and resld.:ntlai uses was assumed, with densities of•80,000 square feet ' per block and 30 units per gross acre, respectively. Ultimate development under Alternative Two 1s expected to produce about twice as much traffic as generated by existing Downtown uses and would add, an, estimated 3,007 vehicles per day to arterials in the area. This represents an lncrease of 1S percent over Alternative One, due to' increased residential densities am. intensification of commercial and office uses. The office/residential d!strlct l along Lake Street would generate approximately twice the.amount of traffic as the Identical medium density residential area in Alternative One. This addition of traffic is nearly offset, however, by the 50 percent reduction of the general commercial area or► Main Street. Traffic volumes and circular ion'pattems associated with Alternative Two will be affected greatly by the ,number and location of parking structures which " will be required to support higher Intensities nf development. Parking structures should Ideally be located close to arterials yet should take access from side streets to minimize congestion on major routes. F .` The visitor-serving commercial uses . along Main Street and the , office/residential uses at Lake and Atlanta are expected to' generate significant non-local traffic that would enter the general area using Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway. While soma of the traffic using Beech . Boulevard may filter down Main Street, the majority would use Atlanta t Avenue. Traffic using Pacific Coast Highway would enter the Downtown aroe via Fifth and Lake Streets. ALTERNATIVE THREE Alternative Three represents a departuro from the previous two alternatives, eliminating the orientation of _•ommerclal uses toward Main Street and i creating a predominantly,residential character for the Downtown core area. in f Alternative Three, visitor-serving commercial uses are limited to tKv first block along Pacific Coast Highway, extending from Tenth Street to south of Lake Street, approximately 37.8 gross acres. The office/residential district has been expanded to 35.3 gross acres to accommodate a maximum of one million square feet of office space and 800 residentla! units. While the first block visitor-serving commercial uses are limited to three sturiee in height, the office and residential area would be allowed a twelve-story maximum height, which would be stepped back from the beach area, with heights j approaching 12 stories near Orange Street. Residential uses In the office/residential area would have an overall average density of 35 units per groan acre. Devolopment would range from 75 to 100 units per block, depending on whether or not office and residential uses wore mixed In the same building. The general commercial area la limited to 6.0 acres, which would support approximately 70,000 square feet of retail space. i 1a er+a'A" "'�' ;Y°�3'Sp"i�r7.Mc;....-r ;• ,r;�*;*n�.»u'.. ,arM:+Po*+�.:.�.w+t .,ens�:.*.^*•.--n• ys� �.�,ra^r •�' ;�^#,',�3�i'!,• ;""�: . , c a `:`S h.:'.'M,. �3�+t?':€�.�'xs'laF;.r:l•+:iar,:w::`+?iaa4'hw. a1a ,r. ,1 Gill VIU Projected traffic volumes from development under Alternative Three are as follows: LAND USE. GENERATION FACTOR TRIP ENDS High Density 5.2TE/DU x 960 DU %000 Residential General 20TE/1,000 sq ft GFA x 70,000 sq ft GFA 1,400 Commercial Visitor 15TE/1,000 sq ft GFA x 200,000 sq ft GFA 3,000 Commercial Office/ 10TE/1,000 sq ft GFA x 1,000,000 sq ft GFA 10,000 Professional Library 100 . A',c.Fir►uE: 312.0 tripe per acre 19,500 These projected volumes are 30 percent higher than Alternative Two, ' 54 psr.:ont higher than Alternative One, and 21 times existing uses. Approximately %000 vehicles per day vmuld be Wded to each of the five major streets In the Downtovwi area; however, local streets would also be impacted. Development at this intensity would require the provision of approximately , , 21500 off-street parking spaces, presumably through a number of multl-level parking structures. The combination of Intense development, numerous parking structures, surrounding high density residential areas, and proximity to the beach will create significant circulation impacts In the Downtown area, especially on Pacific Coast Highway, Atlanta Avenue, And Lake Street. Development of a transportation center near Lake Street would considerably � Improve circulation in the area by reducing the number of automobiles 1 commuting to the offir,- district and possibly by riuducing the demand far parking and for parking situctures. Secondary impoeta on Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street may alto occur as a result of this alternative,-especially during commuting hours and during summer months when recreational traffic i is highest. ! s , The following table summarizes the projected daily traffic volumes for existing conditions and the three alternntives: � I ► I i � s1 ..r!', �,,�'�'"-�" :� 'r. P,�'W"�Sr+7*,';'f.'�"p'e^�+�* •;,7.�'T's+.M.,+ 1L7 F;�"�q'"''MA. ..� ,'fiY,^` a���,, .:". r'� i LAND USE EXISTING ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE TYPE USES ONE TWO THREE `; Reelilelittal 1,560 trips 2,280 trlps 2,300 trips 5,000 trips General 3,406 4,550 3,000 1,400 commercial ;;' Vlnitor 19350 4,500 61000 31000 Commercial ' 800 1,230 3,600 10,000 r Professional r Library/ ,.,.250 100 .. Public Bldgs r TOTAL. . 7,360 tripe 12,660 tripe 15,000 tripe 199500 trips j AVERAGE 117.8 tripe/rite 202.E tripe/acre 240.0 trips acre 312.0 trips/ec'•ro ` 20 if ' 1 3.0 CONCLUSION r The information presen!ed in this memo Is but one facet of the Coastal Element. It should be remembered that the element seeks to implement the California Coastal Act while addressing local concerns. There are conflicts botwaen the needs of the region and the state and the needa of the City of Huntington Beach. Theso conflicts tiro addressed and hopefully reconciled in the policies proposed as part of the Coastal Element. {' The policies, together with the land use plan, will form the basis for Phase III j of the local Coast l Program -- Implementation of the Coastal Element. Whichever Alternative la chosen, there will be a need to continue the procora of balarxing regional and local needs within the context of the Coastal Act. The implementation phase will be crucial In determining the success of tho plan. The pelicles contained in the Coastal Elena3nt will be implemented by � ordinances adapted by the City. Times ord',..,noes moat be detailed enough to apply the policies on a site-by-site basis. Because of the complexities involved In adapting many zoning dtstrlcts to this detailed level staff recommends that + a specific plan tic developed for the Downtown area which will allow flexibility but w lOi will also piovide guidance to the private sector. it should be noted that the uses for the area will be determined by the Coastal Element, but the actual projects which am built will be a rosult of market demand and private sector involvement. r 21 I 1 y R.l..!I+11.��YHwc}.•'kAJ.FAIM Y•4 •.}.Mat t .... IC . . .,. CITY OF HtdJNTII\IGTON BEACH P.O. BOX 190 DEPAnTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CALIFORNIA 92648 BUILDING DIVISION 1714153"241 PLANNING DIVISION(?1i163.2ti271 } Tp; Honorable Mayor and City Council ATTN: Frank -B. Arguello, Acting City Administrator. FROM: James W. Palin, D'.rector, Department of Development Services DATE: November 12, 1980 SUBJECT: COASTAL ELEMENT 'Attached is additional information regarding agenda item D2_e, the Coastal Element. The first attachment is the Coastal .Element Document containing the revisions approved by the Planning Commission on November 4, 1980. Additions to the text and informational maps have been italicized and deletions crossed out. These same revisions have been compiled for easy reference and are attached to the Coastal Element request for Council action. ' Also attached to this letter is a copy of the Planning Commission actions regarding the Coastal Element taken on November 4, 1980, as recorded In the draft minutes of that meeting Included are two maps of Land Use Alternative Three (one of the entire coastal zone and one of the Downtown) as modified by the Planning Commission. A third attachment is a set of all written commii received on the Coastal Element to date. > Because of the importance of the Coastal Element and the large hmourt of public interest in the document, the Planning Department has attempted to provide ample time for public hearing and Council discussion. Staff recommends that the Council take public testimony on November 17, 19800 and continue the public hearing to December 1, 198G. Staff further recommends that the Council then adjourn to December 8, 1980, for the sole purpose of discussing the Coastal Element. This additional meeting on December 8, 1980, could be used to receive public testimony, to discuss provisions of the Element, and to provide staff with direction regarding Council recommended revisions to the plan. Stuff will then prepare a resolution for the Counoll to consider at its December 15, 1980 meeting. Council adoption 'of the Element on December 15, 1980 will enable the City to meet the State-legislated deadline of January 1, 1981, for receiving adopted coastal land use plans from local governments. Reupectfully submitted, I amen W. Palin, Direct-.or Department of Development Servicen JWII I CI r " IN W. Page Two ATTACHMENTS: 1. Coastal. Element Document as revised by. Planning Commission . 2. Draft Minutes of November 4, 1980 Planning Commission Meeting 3, Coastal Land Use Alternative 'Three "Modified" -- -Entire .Coastal Zone 4. Coastal Land Use Alternative Three "Modified" Downtown 5. Written Public Comments I i i } ATTACHMENT A PLANNING COMMTSS16N ACTION 1. Approve Alternative Three and revise as follows:l a. Delete all references to specific building height limitations. Prepare a specific plan for the downtown area which incorporates ratios of building height to open space and setbacks. b. Redesignate the area fronting Pacific Coast Highway between Twenty. First and Twelfth Streets from high density residential to medium density residential. c. Redesignate the area bounded by Pacific Coast Hightway, Lake Street, Atlanta Avenue, and the proposed extension of Delaware Street from high density residential to medium density resi- dential. 2. Eliminate all depiction of streets, scenic routes, bikeways, and sewers in the Bolea Chica: Figuren 2.7, 4.2, 4.3, 9.1, 9.4, and 9.5. 1Depicted as Alternative Three Modified on the 8001 scale ` Coastal Land Use Map II , i y . t ATTACHMENT B RECOMMENDED REVISIONS TO THE COASTAL ELEMENT I t a F z e y t ATTACHMENT B-1 - TEXT CHANGES Page 25 Narrow unmarked paths leading down the bluffs at various intervals have been formed over time by repeated usage, and there is one stairway to:the beach in the vicinity of Sixteenth Street. The provisiori 'of. additional stairways and improved paths from the bluff.' top to, the aand at , regular intervals between the southern..,edge of the State Beach pa�rkir,g lot and 'B+eventh Ninth Street is needed to improve shoreline access along tFfs segment 'of the coastal zone, The City's coastal policy identifies the . ( entire area between the State Beach parking .lot and , Sleventh Ninth Street as requiring access improvements. . Page 27 Provision of stairways or.walkways to improve public •... access to Bolsa Chica State Beach Between Eleventh Ninth Street and the southern edge of the Bolsn Chica State Beach parking lot, 'Y Page 45 Ekeetrieity Electrical transmission lines, highly visible along the teach bluffs and in the wetlands, can seriously detract from the scenic potential of the coast. In order to enhance these areas, the City encourages undergrounding of electrical transmission lines in accordance with the rules a-ana` re-ulations of the California Public Ut 1 t es Comm sR o, an will establish a priority list or future projects. ! I i Page 47 Wetlands Additional visual improvements could include: land- ! scaping treatment on the banks of the flood control channels and relocation of visually and physically degrading structures such as electrical transmission lines, where it is technically anU-cconomically feasible. I I a +lIe7Ei7:'t1s'tS�9h':L55?6°�Ti �''?sX���"' 1�� '' >�a' _h".'�.%*wit't�SQi�archSaxnv¢.�s"C'Cf°F:S?.!►++.�4'!r..+srnci�r�asa......+e.,«�...,�..............._.._________ _ -2- i Page 47 Pacific Coast Highway Status The 'Scenic Highways Element rpeommends that...the City, pursue those . actions ,_necessary For Pacific.'Coast.Highway to achieve. State Scenic _Highway status. These actiolas could .include: 1) developing zoning ordinances 'regarding building heights, . setbacks, nigning, density and other factors for roadside areas, 2). encouraging 'unc�ergxourid- ing of .utilities, wires, and pipes,An accordance with the rules and-re ulaf:ions of.;.tlte "Cal fore a .rubl c Ut it es Commission, 3) developing a ,roadaide maintenance E control program, Znd �.; parahibiting bi.11boaxds"'zil6rig pdcifir. Coast Highway. Page 55 -Thermal Discharge from' the Edison Power Plant Ff ! : i The Edison plant noes tikes in ocean water for cooling ,x -and then discharges' the Heatea water back into the sea. . Page 56 on-going regulation of thermal discharges and "other-'pollutants . ''` is not within the city'si purviews-howavevr-the-Coastal-E4wment `,-. flees-+�oe�u��e-x�aKi:r�um-�eass#ble-��k#gat#ea-�eaeu�sa-k�eto�e»view ; es-expandad-eaellRg»�aa�a,�t�r�s-wi.l�-bow-pars��,tt',ad-�a--t'kfl-�abasta� ZORew, but isextenai.vaiy regulated under state and federal law. Page 61 CONCLUSION , ' I Through the land use plan and accompanying policies and .actions, the City aims toward achieving the following: ' I,�; �,#rrftatieh-of-inpacte-f rem-tihertne�--eatfai}s-bx . r n mzts at.ier�-men.�dres-bPfeare a o f g g PP expanafen-of-eoa}ing-f.nc�r3#tea. I t I j I A -3- Page 67 the-Belsa-Ehtes-area-ie-adseee�t-ku-�hr-6itiyls-eoas�:dl sane-bat-w#tibia-the-�c�r#sd�Cet#en-a€-��ie-Ee�anty-e€ . grange-:--cPhie-area-le-leeated-!in-the-northern-Beetien of-the-Ertyit�-eraat�t-and-isl-berdereid-by-Pseif#e3-Feast Highway-te-the-went-and,-the-city-en-the-rema#n#ny- three a Idea r--Pertien -e¢-the-8a#set-Ehiee-preyvide-neat#ng and- er-inelading . the••C?nlffernie-#east-term-the-�#ght-fe�eted-clepptr�r railT-the-Beld�xng-ea3�annah-epQrxoroT-end-the-ble�esk-rep##7 . al=-endangered-epeaiee=--A-296-sere-ecelag#ea#-reserve waa-designated-in-l9-73-;i'-an-agreement-betwean-the private-ewnerT-Signal-bandma:rk-earperatienT-and-the State: i The Bolsa Chica wetlands are adjacent, to the. City's coastal zone, . but at the prevent time are within the jurisdictiion of the County of Orange. This environ- mentally sensitive habitat area in bordered by the City on three aides and the Pacific Coast Highway on the remaining side and is within the sphere of influence of t. Huntington Beach. <; Less than two square miles . remain of a wetlands that once covered over thirty square miles. That which doer remain, however, still provides valuable habitat for a ,F broad diversity of wildlife. It may be best known as a w.ntering area for Pacific Flyway waterfowl; it Also provides foraging, roosting, resting and/or breading habitat for a variety of wildlife. These include the California least tern, the Belding Bava nnah sparrow, the �. light-footed clapper rail, the brown pelican, the black rail, and the peregrine falcon - all endangered species. The Balsa Chica was recognized as an environmentally sensitive habitat area by the California Coastal Commis- sion when they outlined the following policy in the; California Coastal Plan: "Restorable wetlands in the po tin Bay area ,haul be pt:�tected from encroaching s l i -4- . i residential development (which should be redirected to other areas that already have urban services) and from intensive recreational proposals (mari.nas) . .: . - ' the bluffs should be protected; vista points should be pracerved and acquired." The Bolsa Chica has been designated as wetlands by the California Coastal r: '+ Commission, the Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. 4 Fish and Wildlife Service, and the California Depart- ment of Fish and Game. The City has designated all wetlands and some buffar areas within its boundaries as "conservation" and specifically promotes the enhancement and/or -restora�- tion 'of. environmentally. sensitive habitats. The . t' t City recommends that the Bolsa Chica be recognized as an. onvironmentally sensitive habitat area within .s its sphere of influence. Page 73 Regional and Local Irrsues in Coastal Energy Planning The energy facilities in the Huntington Beach coastal zone serve a greater-than-local community. The Edison plant provides electricity to much of the-eeunty- Southern California and is part of an interstate power Ur id. Page 78 Edison Power Plant g'�ir-Btate-recently-atadied-uhc-arse-nrettnd-4ha-Gttietttsg Httntine3tar+-Beach-peHar-piant7--eta-repert-did-pat-ree- �: et�urend-p�at+t-expansion-in-Huntington-Beach-at-thfs-tfr�e, , '� but did-ssat-preelade-thC-reaarb#�ttx-of-cxpariafar►-near-- ;I 111>. � the-crating-site-fin-the-aEatnre-if-appreprfntr.-m�tfgn- ..� Lien-meeettres-are-tnhen---New-feeiiitien-at-tire-paver i punt-H:�il•-inciesde-a-ydenexs-air-pei�intien-central-deYiea ' nnd7-pcirhaper-mare-has-turbine-peaking-finite-which Nc,aie�-be-installed-an-uhe-exist#ng-niier.Y--New-fdeier t�►ach-ae-n-ceai-gaeif ieatien-lnxe3dcty-n+aY-be-used-to-i�f re ''.. thee-bafiere-in-the-fatttre7 f t The area around the existin5 Huntington Reach powor ' plant hats been left`available for future ex ans b.)C ` the Coastal Commission by virtue o 3 sect on 414 (b? . c ddoncriptIon of -the area in found in the CoailEdF Common s "Ucs;i nttt on ot Coas;tal Areas Where Power ` Nantss Would Be Incon_s�s stent L•I th Coastal Act c Lives. " I . i .....,�..�!��ersa .rah+a;etas�r�r,......•a.a•rrx*,.c*�raaarr�+at*srx�rnnr.�,k�+�'it.�^"��Y� v+'�^?.. MI T .. %}�F.' . .: •F,:•ref Y,"•;a:}�;•,. . The California Ene 'rCc mmission:.-has also studied the area in a retort entitled,.-.'!opportunities,:,tos.Expand.. Coastal Power.-Plan ts.'an :Ca ifornla"7 and xecommen so=.,` . teat t e.maintenance: of", reasonable expansion-op rtuni- ties• at ..the•ate- .The re ort<notes;�a�tvariet ';of,,con- ventiona tec nolo .,ex ana on>o ortun t .es at the s te:,,,. New face ties under cons derat one ,iE son nclu e:=:the u-tTlizatlono '-c eaner urn n uels i or `t�ia� ex st._.n� acilit es suG •as met ano 'and s nt etic as. Any future expansion would—be accompan e. _ v appropriate mitigat_on measures. Page 78 Coastal Dependency Dependence on a coastal location is an important cri- terion for setting use priorities in the coastal. zone. Many oil wells and pipeline landfalls and. outfalls are coastal dependent. The Edison j!lant, diB'cuased ser�a_telY, would also be considered coasta open ent at this time. CQNCLU570N 1 i, Page 93 The goals and policies contained in the City's housing element are specifically incorporated into the coastal plan in order to address the needsof low and moderate income households, in a comprehensive and balanced manner. Additional coastal t . policies aim to achieve: the following: s Provision of affordable housing in new residential dovelop- ` meets. infill of vacant lots with low and moderate income housing ' units where ponsible. ; t Dove.t•opment of a conversion ordinance addressing the need ; to retain low and moderate cost housing units, He}�lHc�a;�ent-a�-low-seed-.sari:3h�ata-ec�c�t,--kevus�nq-J���.-t?�e-HuaAt � • that.-ruub.-u�;��,L•►�.-.��a-der�aL�ruteod-c+F..secue+ved. t" t Page 111 The County has prepared an alignment -Lor--t.#�a-•aeMr�I►ore- j - - - ir� r-�-t which would improve access onto " the Huntington Beach Mesa and the proposad Bolan Chica .f _ linear. park. �Phra-ecsnska}-p#en-abppoxks-the-exkens#t,n ef-Bdlga--P.h#ce-5kreet:---}}e�reberT-ahanid-khe-8e#na-eh#ee leH#ands-hp-dMaxnnarcd-ez-wet#end37..4:he�Exky-xedegn#�aeti- i that-the-VOndwnq-r-my y*-be-n-persni+ terl--bee-tintleM- t�eteata#-hek-pe�i•Cy: i i 1 r� k ATTACHMENT H-2 1 LAND USE CATEGORIES Page 121 Visitor--Serving - The visitor-serving commercial cat- egory is a new designation created in response to the �. Coastal Act policy which encouragAs adequate visitor- serving facilities in the coastal area. The principal q permitted uses are hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, museums, specialty and beach-related retail, and service uses. office and residential uses would also be allowed by s ecial permit. These uses are located near visiting- drawing attractions such as the Municipal Pier and the 1 beaches, and along major access routes from inland areas. Page 122 Resource Production - The resource production' desi.gnation is intengea to accommodate coastal-dependant energy oil activities. Principal permitted uses include -oil we iv, ' injection equipment, separation and treatment facilities, storage tanks, transmission lines, equipment storage and Maintenance yards, and administrative offices. This designation is not applied to the areas where small-scale .;: oil production activity takes place in conjunction with other primary land uses. Rather, the resource production designation is used for areas where the extraction, separa- tion, storage, and transmission of crude ,oil constitutes the primary land use and is anticiapNed to the the major use for the next 15-30 years. Page 123 Conservation - Conservation is a new designation intended to protect valuable resource areas in the coastal xr ie ' from most types of development. The de4ignatiort a.t.LOWB enlry ' . certain low intensity act:ivitApr which provide public access, so long as the resourc being protected are not: impaired. Such support activities could include picnic and observation arenas, nature trails and peripheral bike paths, informational signs or displays, and peripheral parking areas. This designation also allows the additional uses outlined In SSections 30233 and 30264 oL t. a canaT al AcE un or the co.- it ons state there n. _... • r . •Yli+•+:Jw..,I1'••.:a•.,ti•°.,.pa:,.i.lS•'..♦..H r<•+ •i.h.::•:'.«l.}1:.R• ..t:w4ii'' K4 I' 1 44 �rx�♦Yi4F k •+� _ 1�.`5,, .. � ..• i `� �,�21� � "$ _�Iiy'1lYl�'� Yv`�=,%t+F�+'�k�'1M S- ��y t, t ��52�° +��} 17!i. ..%.A J.Ti �� '�•.�h ~< � �:�... K ���i'_.. Y• dY���R�'�tt`.. ;L�.l�i�a�'�J'1...��'�xi�'i.�'.°v�ix..r ]tti�� �s 1 ATTACHMENT H-3 LAND USE ALTERNATIVES Page 141 Building Heights Footnote The three land use alternatives which follow indicate Added appropriate heights for various areas.l It should be noted that the six and twelve story limitations would not necessarily mean that the entire area would be built to the designated limit. A specific plan, or other zoning device, would be necessary to include open space, setback and other considerations;. A "step down" approach,, diminishing heights nearer the ocean may be desired, along with phasing of development. This will be considered in the implementation phaue of the plan. t Referendes to-insight. limitations have been deleted from the descrIpt-ion of Alternative Three to reflect Planning Commission recommendations adopted on October 28, 1980, Page 146 ALTERNATIVE: NU1413FR ViREE - HIGH INTENSITY The intense nature of this concept ,encourages high rise atructures, especially in the core area. The Downtown is relatively .small, however, and development there must be compatible with the character of the entire City. Thus, the: implementation of this alternative would re- quire controls which ensure ,setbacks and' open space to protect views, Provide adequate parking and circulation, tnd prevent one or two structures from capturing the entire market. potential of the area. �h#a-al�nswa�#ue aqv#s#aps»bu#ld#ngs-a#-up»te-t:wa?�+e-sLasi•ns3-te-Qseata.-the daa4 Fad-usbaa-atmor.phor-o-and-ma4nta#n-a»aat�ua3uce-pawHt:ew►n. A visitor.-serving commercial designation in applied to the first: block fronting Pacific Coast Highway between Tenth and Lake Streets and to the Mlunicipal Pier and adjoining restaurant. i3u#ld#tag-lie#Hkssrs-ef-up-to-tt�sea ater#e�-weu7d-law-appcs�ps�ate-#R-t;kt#R -u#s#tat<-cam;acsaiaL at=ya-4H.lar�c�a.+�f--Paca#�#c;»geas�.-Fi#�ghwa}-#x;..c��'dAs-xg-ps:a+�esua V�AME3»��9�i-�•ii,ti.�pd--(:t;�LiA�.Ii�A�i�r Page 147 The remaining arcas, a total of 225 acres between CoMenwest rtrnet and Beach Boulevard, are re- served fvr residential uses. troth density reAs3identinl in applied to the old Civic Center nitp, Nigh-density Medium d2ppitY residential is applied to the first block fronting Pacific Coast Highway betwrien., Twenty-first and Twelfth Streets, the 44- acre area bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Delaware Street, and Atlanta Avenue, A-raodihtim-dwtitsity--rec#chat#Ra y', dAsi�3pa3::pep-#s-apes#ad and to approximately 148 arrest between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard. and-pslrAawar#l�* AA'��Ai7eAa-R?:�Fa!'►�iiij- �vAG�-12Ri 6HT s t� ,',•��,.1��,+Yfi�':.'•:.3: '_k.+....uw,..e.....r....+ ...v.... ..a...._•...,a. ...�,.._........ .«. aw... ..»... • ..•,.,-c:.. .•r.............. ...... �. ..a...uw+.r..wrw.u.ma,marr......-,.....�:-.�,'' •r ' t l r ATTACHMENT B-4 POLICY CHANGES RECRFATTON AND SHORELINE ACCESS f Page 150 la. Prohibit development of permanent abova-ground structures on the beach sand area with the excep- tion of the following permitted uses: - Lifeguard tow�:rs and other facilities necessary ' for public ,safety ¢I - Public •restrooms and beach concession stands when located immediately adjacent to paved perking or access areas. - Reconstruction and expansion related to the Municipal Pier - Fire ringe and volleyball nets f - Bike trails, bike support facilities, and handicapped access k Page 150 ld. Encourarae maximum expansion of Sunset Aquatic Vaik j acil_t es -ZWhasizing molt ple uses includin t s: ollow .��ng9: boat launc ram s, small oat rentals, �ont spas, and storage for use by t e public-* Page 152 4a. Require an easement in all new development to allow access to and along the mean high tide line or to public recreation areas or to public trails and bikeways unless: Page 153 - Adequate access exists nearby or is proposed by the r. land use plan within a reasonable distance; or Access at the site would result in unmitigable advr:rso ? im .acts; on areas designated "Conservation" b the land P 9 Y � use plan; or -- Findings are made, consistent with Section. 30212 of the Coastal Act that access is inconsistent with public safety, military security needs, or that agriculture would be adversely affected, or i -- The parcel is too narrow for an adequate buffer separating the lateral accessway from private residence and would ; therefore adversely affect the privacy of the property $. owner. t These exceptions shall not apply to -the Pacific Electric Right-of-Way. ' •.w••�.rYaru..h ...... ..__.... ..._................ ................ ... _.............. ........--.... ......�.... ..�...... . +vsgYN.\J/JIYW N.K'IY�.`+.M�.Y. • 1 • 1 --2_ f: Policy Changes (Cont. ) r Page 153 4d. Initiate cooperative planning efforts with the State Park and Recreation Department and affected private: parties and pursue funding to develop a pedestrian access ,program from Pacific Coast highway to the beach in the area from north-.af 'S1eventh • Ninth Street north to the southern -edge -of the Dolsa Chica -State Beach p'arkiric lot. VISITOR-SERVING FACILITIES Page 154 5a. Encourage the provision of additional restaurants and hotel/motel accommodations in keeeinO with the alternative chosen by the C1tX Council. VISUAL RESOURCES Page. 154 . 6b. Prohibit any alteration of the natural landform of the bluffs seaward of Pacific Coast Highway including grading and. the development of parking lots; alterations 'neccosar for .develo ment of ublic trails and sta zAt on of bluffs may e 2ermitted subject to City approval. Page 155 6k. Establish landscaping ordinances uidelinea s eci- Ty nng suitable vegetation types for the coastal area. Page 156 7d. Consider the following priority within the coastal zone for undergrounding of dtki-ieies overhead:; utility and tole hone lines in accordan�' ce—Wth the ri+ es and re ulat ons of the. Californla Publ. c UE111ties Commission. Page 156 7g. where feasible, require landscaped medians along Pacific Coast Highway prior to permitting any m or improvements which would inciease the capacity- of tt-ie highway!. •fit. •••.•t"'r^.S:i+�`%:ly.{rill.,.;r..:.r..•,.rrn,,....._........... . r--•�+. ..-...�.......,, .... .a..•r3 t•_.J,..4'•-., wwla.anrr4v, '...:-c.,ns.>.w........�...-.+•w.a.,a.M.w•w,R.i►uat%aAi...r+...+..Ow.: l • -3- ' 1 Policy Changes (Cont. ) 1 WATER AND MARINE RESOURCES I Page 156 8d. Prior to approval of any new. .or.• expanded outfall.s, require-maxlmem-fieasibie encourage ..the provision of maximum mitigation measures to prevent minimize damage to marine organisms in accordance w th state and federal law. Page 157 8e. Prior to approval of any new or _expanded seawater f pumping facilities, ecit�ie-maxisaum-�easiblr� 'encourage the provision of_ maximurn mitigation measures to prevent. minimize damage to marine organisms due to entertainment- in accordance with state and federal law. ;ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE HABITATS Page 157 9. Preserve and enhance' environmenCally .sensitive habitats, includin` the Holaa Chxca which is within the sphere of -influefic—e-of the C ty of Huntington Beach. Page 158 10b. Promote the participation of County; State and federal agencies in the enhancement and mainten-- ance of environmentally sensitive habitats .by , actively pursuing funding from the California ;. Coastal Conservancy and other State and federal agencies to develop. and maintain landscaped buffer areas around the edge of the. wetlands.from-Beaeh 1• Baeieberd-te-tk�-6ahta-Ana-River-meuth�. i`. ENERGY 2 The intent of the following policies is to ensure the , compatibility among different activities on safety 4 and aesthetic criteria; Page 164 14c. Before permitting any.-expansion` of the Edison power plant, require development of a compre- t hensive screening plan with appropriate land- } sraping which meets the::standards-of ,State agencies having jurlsalction over such expansion. page' 164 14h. Encourage scrceiiin o'f exi"stin -Edison poi4eir lant . acilit es vla.- Fiantina ,of trees:rand shrubs; ursue i strata lea to this end with Southern California } Edison Company. a +wow•►..••.....'`..ww~..... ..,. .. ......,_«..�.._.. .._ .-_.. ..- .._ .._. �..�.-.+..........._ .........».... .........�.�.._......... .. .. ....:...•+..�....��.�' I 1 -a- Policy Changes (Cont. )' THOUS I NG Page 165 15c. investigate the feasibility of implementing an expanded grant program for mobile--home low and moderate housing rehabilitation, including mobile homes. the-Bellew#wg-three-pal#e#ee-�efleet-t#�e-dal#few#a-6eaeta3� Cgmsa#sa#ea's-#n�e�p�otat;#eq-©f-t#�e-#�eueis�g-�ec1�x�:�dmeRbs-a� �k�e--Coastal-Aet.--�k�e-C#ty-��ay-w#sh-�e-•aeta�#do�-aldew�E�ag-fin l#eu-#lase--�e�-Eraallae-pee�eeta-e�-etheK-alte�at#sine-to-�k�ese Ael#ofes-te-�e€�.est-leeal-®owae�ws-#n-the-#�ple►�entat#an.-e� bhe-Coastal-Aet+ �gd.-AeRt�#�e-that--#�-law-awd-r�e�leeate-seat--laeus#ug-un#te-aria • dermal#shed--there-be-:a-ewe-te..ewe-�eplaee�apt-a�-»edrh-uta#ter prefe�abl�-w#bb#�a-t#�a-seastal-aerie.-=-(Sxaept-wbea-boplaaed b}-Xes�dent#al,-A�a�aets--e�-�eue-a�-3ess-un#te.�• l6e•,-Reelu#�a-that-�S-Pe�eept-a€-alb-new-gee#cleat#al-p�a�eeta-e6 S-eF-mQ�®-uw#L-B-be-a€�o�dable-te-law-awd-mede�ate-#pve�te , i l�eus+�belde-as--de€loved-by-tbe-b#tysa_�taua#tag-�9.ataentt ; �eRL•al-ua#ts-aye-AKe]�u�iad-f�sr�-ths-saga#�araenL•a-e�-tk�#s 15g,, Retaiin ex stun mobile h� arell6, throuah Mgbile home zonincz in order 'to' meat the re!auirements• for low- and moderate- income housing' in the cQijstgl zolae. k Should the Coastal Commission not accept: the mobile home ppka in the coastal zone as- the Citv's four share g affordable housing, apply the foll.owincl policy: 15h. Require that -20 porcent_ df 511L new residential D'rOiects of 20 or, more units be affordgjbje to joV {Ar d' mo er'jjttG_ income households as defined by the City's Hous n ., ` Element Where possible rzur_h units shah. be� within the coastal zone; however, where this is nc)t fgasibIq the units may be supplied !2utglde the zgnp�,,- New resi- dential developments of less than 20 unit, may nmv a "per-unit" fee in lieu of 20 yercent gf the oraiect-'beina affordable to low and moderate $nc4me hogagboldas 'rental units -are excluded from the reauir.ement of this ,Bo icy: smaller projects of ten or less units will be e,:jcl.uded from the provisions of thip policy. t COMMUNITY FACILITIES Pages 166 161. Maintain the number of ex..5ting' traffic lanes 'or) Pacific Coat Highway within City boundaries.' "Including Chica;� and encourage the provision of 'safety 'a.rrangements for pedestrian vehicles, such as landscaped•mediansi speed controls, and- enforcement, a►nd aepose the six.-laning pro=' nasal_ in order to nunport alternate forms of 4:ransportati6rl. �.u+rr+,----...- c--':spa•..,r�....+._.-.--.....-. .. ..� r.c..w...wr..ra. .,..«,-:.. vice,..a++.x:rt✓;•xn.w.r..+•..+.-....,...—r...,�, r Policy Changes (Cont.) 16j , EEEegerye the Pacific'Electric right-of-way_parallel' to Lake Street to the City, boundary as a transit corridor. ' 16k. Encourage the`use of •park'ing areas outside the coalW �rll; zone for passenger cars and the development of alternate transportation modes for beach users. lbl. referencia"for the OCT 'recomme ded Exn1;ess Q H sx n location concept at Pacifio' Coast Highwa_y.:and• ' Lake 'Street. The center .on that site,should be ►. designed- nearer'Atlanta Avenue and related to the -orange/Atlanta east-west circulation- p4ittern. • i 'r . i u. ...,..., .. ....-.w.....rw,,.,.+.. - •++.....w..r...,n..r......._. ..r.,�4�1L'S`-il.r'...Ytfur+a"'a .• ..: •. _ _ r- j ,t,ter c IIUJTINGTON BEACH N6;WPORT BEACH H'UNTINGION BENCH GII ORNIA. I'IANNING DIVISION Coastal Zone Bb''(ii ary F n ��`�'�'��!,*�.:t2.ti.�•W4/'ww•rwMrw.,- .w wwrw\wYt'•M"r,t' .....- ...�+r..w•4�.N•r+r•fr►.ANltti^Ir►L'ti'rMVA I.,hV i/Iil4Mwaw.�.tiMe1'{'MNg1.WAtN ,+�• REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION 1 , Submitted by James W. Palin Department Development Services Date Prepared November b, , 19 80 Backup Material Attached Yes No Subject LOCAL COASTAL ELEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 5 ' , �rrr - - City Administrator's Comments Approve as Recommended '• MIS- `'. Statement of Issue, Remmmendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: '. STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The City!s Local Coastal Element has been .prepared in; accordancer ;r with California Coastal Act requirements including information, sufficiently detailed to indicate .the kinds,; locatioh and intensity ` 4 of. land 'uses .,and applicable resource protection .and development policies, in the- coastal zone. .Public hearings, on the. Local, Coastal Element ware concluded before the Planning 'Commissioq on November•,;4, 1980 at which time the Commission approved the Coastal Element with revisions. The Coastal Element is now transmitted for City Council ` public hearing. ., PLANNING COMMTS-ION ACTION: =; :The Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 1270 recommending City Council adoption of the Local Coastal Elemon' t as amended by ` the following vote: AYZ;S: Bannister, Winchell, Kenefick, V�rter, Schumacher, Bauer .f NOES; None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Greer RECO6I4ENDATIrJ.•, 1. Open 'the public hearing on the Local Coastal .Element, " receive testimony, and continue to December 1, 1980 for further testimony. f v10 sire .� yr� •"+Y. "1'^*.`.^.•'i:fi"'+�.,n arH a.►Rvv++w..,....w...+........:..yf .......-....r.. r:i•:.ta+,'.ar>rt'..{,';.::lntnr.-r^rh•.<i+w4r.r.......•..�»•.wr....•.rr......v..r+•w.....r w.. .. r•ifi:1`.i l�,t,�•v$i,�'t'VY•n'Yt` - •1 t Page Two ANALYSIS: The,,Local Coastal Element details land uses and applicable resource protection-and development policies for the ',City's r coastal zone.: The. Planning Commission approved Alternative 3 ! ' land •use designations with revisions (Attachment A) as well- as various textual and policy revisions (Attachment H) . T.ie City Council. public hearing on November•. 17,. 19800, was .r advertised for the Coastal' Element in general. In continuing the public hearing 'to later meetings, however, the Council may wish to consider the following options for conduct.ing' the ' hearings: 1. Accept testimony on the Coastal Element in general throughout the bearing process. ' 2. Divide later hearings into the Downtown Area and the remainder of the. Coastal Element in general. + 3. Divide: later hearings. into specific 'segments of`-the Coastal Element and/or areas within the coastal zone. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Local aoencies ,are .not required by the Coastal Act; to pre are �* p environmental documentation for the Local Coastal Element. After adoptian.ot the Coastal Element by the City Council,•. the Coastal Commiss3on_Estaff _will prepare :an environmental assedii edh. FUNDING SOURCE: None- required. ; ALTERNATIVES: Select one of the formats presented above for conducting the public w: hearings on the Coastal Element. Res ectful subtritted James,;W. Palin, 'Director Department'of Development services JWP:CC:gc ATTACHMENT: Recommended Revisions to the Coastal Element Df MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1980 - 7:00 PM COMI4ISSI6NEnS PRESENT: Bannister, Kenefick, •Wi:nchell, Porter, Greer, :;chumacher, Bauer COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None CONSENT AGENDA: qzl ONfMOTION BY BANNISTER.;AND SECOND BY KENEFICK THE CONSENT:AGENDA, CONSISTING OF ,AN. EXTENSION OF ,TIME FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 79-32, WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: . Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Bauer NOBS: . None ABSENT:. None ABSTAIN: Greer ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: ' LOCAL COASTAL PLAN - AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL� PLAN Consideration _vf a Coastal Element, a` State-mandated plan. The element will be addition to the 'City Is General Plan. June;.C�italano` spoke to'.describe how .she changes had been;made to the element since the last: meeting:.'Attachment B-l 'contains changee 'to the text of 't6- documents Attachment B;�-2 shows,' any.., changes to the . 1and: use 'categories; Attachment: B-3 reflects the ' changes to land.,use alternatives;' and Attachment B--4 shows policy changes* ' Att:achmeit Areflects the Commission's tentative. approval of Alternative 3 for the downtown area, the direction for deletion of mention of any public facilitic3 or roadways in the Bolsa ChicR, -and t:I:e• alterations to the coastal;zone map Made necessary. by- the Commisslon's prior .action. (These .att+ach ments are hereby`,attached and made a part of t.nese minutes.) It was deterrmined .by' the Cormnission to.,reopen. the 'public hearing and take brief public testimony on areas not already covered 'by ' prior speakers. r. ;� J .�•:siR'!'+ii3Sil'LYw•warwu►.+w+...x..*wun•e+wvrr.+.«w�u.,,n•.:r.+a,:g:.r,;:ni:,',.. .:��a.r�«;:ia,.�iLI•'3:::ra'.�'t'::f7:1'f:T'rmab�►ae».at'sY�..FsiJ+:tif«7►"'�iX:)i�:l'. '. . S Minutes H.B. Plannin� .ommissio:i #4 November 4� 1980 - (� f 1i1� w,i3J X Page 2 The public hearing was reopened. Jack .Chalabian, KTJ,. Properties, Inc. , again addressed the Commission in regard .to;.the exiiting''commercial designation on a parcel at the end,.of Edinger Avenue in 'Huntington- Harbour.. lie asked- that the Com- mission consider the information in an economic feasibility study prepared in 1978 . in. ullocating a land use .designation to' this property and• cited a communication from the Regional Coastal. Commission .staff which he said had expressed the opinion that a residential designa--, tion-`for the site would be appropriate and acceptable under prescribed conditions. There were 'no. other persons to address the Commission in regard to the coastal plan, and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Schumacher questioned the wording .iu Item 4a on pp. 152- 153 'of Attachment B74 , noting that to apply the exceptions to access easements to the abandoned Pacific ,Electric right-ofrway might pre- clude the City from using the corridor in the future. This proposal was reviewed at length by the Commission and staff. ON MOTION BY. SCIiUMACHER AND SECOND BY BAUER STAFF WAS. INSTRUCTED TO ADD.THE.FOLLOWING .WORDING TO ITEM 4 a,-'PAGE 153:. "TIiESE'EXCEPTIONS SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF--WAY, " BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: I;enefick, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mauer NOES: Bannister ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Greer Commissioner Bannister questioned the.'ownership status .of the right- of--waY. pnd.. was informed' by Secretary Palin that research of the County Tax Ass essor's. reco :ds had revealed that the strip of land .is still on. record as belonging to ,the,:Southern, Pacific Transportation .Company, and there has' been no revereio`n of: title as of the middle of the past week. Chairman Porter 'added' that .the Commission has been, condi- tioning tracts, bordering on the right-of-way so that future title interest, if any exists, will be dedicated to the City by the devel- opers of those tracts. Commissioner Kenefick discussed the housing policies on page -165, saying;that she would like to strike both 15d and 15e and add different language to provide more flexibility: than 'the two above , sections would allow, in order to meet an anticipated requirement by the, Coastal Commissions fur. provision of affordable housing.-The Com-- mission.discussed`}the wording proposed by Ms. Kenefick and alternative wording to effect provision of affordable housing in the coastal zone. ON MOTION BX .KENEFICK AND. SECOND- BY PORTER THE COMLMISSION DETERMINED TO ADD' THE FOLLOWING POLICY AS ITEM .1511 ON PAGE 165, 'AND TO DELETE ITEMS 15d .AND 15e, BY THE FOLLOWING �VOTE: -x- 11-4-80 P.C. {; � a"�':Sit:.YtXtrtciwrc....,+•.vrn�.tiaa:t*ti�tnlnn.e.,,-:A ,'f•:• .:1,:. .,.«?- �. • v s.+ Ra:.':u,+'.15iJft;.gl,a[=vrv.sa+iry+ewowt� Minutes, H.B. Plo,ining Commission November 4, 1980 Page 3 15h. Require that 20 percent of all new residential projects of 20 or_ moie units be affordable to low and moderate in- come households as defined by .the City,!s Housing Element. Wnere_.posslble, such units shall be within the coastal zone; however, where this is not feasible,' the units may be,. supplied outside the zone. New residential developments. of less than 20 units may pay a "per-unit" fee in lieu of 20 percent of the,.project being affordable .ta low and. moderate income Museholds;. .rental units are excluded from the' require- ments of this policy; smaller projects of 10 or less units will be excluded from the provit-tons of this policy. .i AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Schumaci:er, Bauer NOES:,. None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Bannister, Greer Commis"Sinner. Winche' ll discussed the remaining: two. policies; which had been recommended by the Local Coastal Program/Citizens Ad- yisor`y Committee and made the following motion, which was .seconded ' by Porter: THAT THE FOLLOWING POLICIES BE ADDED TO THE COASTAL ELEMENT: 1. Investigate the feasibility . of implementing an expanded. g rant program for low and moderate income housing rehabilitation-, including mobile homes. 2. Recommend .that through use of the MH zoning district the City shall retain existing mobilehome areas and encourage the addition of other areas zoned for mobile homes. .Discussion took place on whether, or not the existing mobilehomes in the coastal zone. might be .accepted by ,the: Coastal Conunission as . the City's share of 'the required affordable housing. The . . .desirability of increasing tl,n ratio of mobilehome zoning in . the coastal zone was .reviewed, and the consensus emerged-that this provision should be stricken from the list of policies. Captain Mel Carpenter of the Regional Coastal Commission' informed the Commission .that he could not guarantee that the existing mobilehome parks could be counted toward the affordable housing .. ! requirement, but he encouraged the. City to pursue such an approach through the State coastal Commission. r Commissioner Porter withdrew his second to the above No. 2 policy recommendation. A ,MOTION WAS MADE. BY BAUNISTER. AND' SECeNDED BY SCHUMACHEI THAT THIS MATTER 'BE TABLED UNTIL .IT IS DETERMINED BY THE COASTAL COM- MISSION WHETHER OR. NOT THE MOBILEHOME PARKS WILL SATISFY THE CITY'S NEED TO' PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE COASTAL ZONE. . MOTION FAILED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: • -3- 11--4-80 - P.C. . ' �'. '':Y�k1;,.'a}ti. .ijw.as.+..<+,,,,r•«+'••++•+•-•��.'t+: .....:cY.�:.':zt'......;x••:••t:«'•i ;:.�: .. .,."J:::4:.::r�....:+:>t...r::,.,.-.•..�....+.........«.,..........+...-.+waarrsu .+wct "��.� y Minutes, H.B. PI nniric .ommission <' r., November h, 1980 i �� `ti� i;,�x.•:. Page Q AYES: Bannister# Greer, Schumacher NOES:: Kenefick, Winchell, ..Porter, Bauer 'ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None WINCHE.LL AGREED TO MODIFY HER ORIGINAL MOTION TO DELETE THE SECOND POLICY RECOMMENDATION: PORTER RENEWED -HIS SECOND TO THE ORIGINAL ' NOTION AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Bauer ' NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Greer ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER AND, SECOND BY BAUER THE COMN.ISSION ADDED ` THE.-FOLLOWING ITEM 15g TO THE HOUSING POLICIES SECTION, BY THE FOL- LOWING VOTE 15g. Retain existing mobilehome areas through mobilehome zoning, in order to meet the requirements for low' and moderate-income housing in the coastal zone. AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Porter, Greer, Schumacher, Bauer NOES: Winchell t '' ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: " None ON. MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY BAUER THE ORIGINAL MOTION ON ITEM 15h WAS AMENDED TO ADD THE FOLLOWING WORDING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: Should the Coastal Con7nission not accept the mobilehome parka ;n the coastal zone as the City's fair share of affordable housing, ap ply' Policy 151:. { ' .AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter$ Greer, Schumacher, Bauer NOES: Nona ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Attachment A: Item ,1 (a) 'ON MOTION-.BY' KENEFICK AND ..SECOND BY 9ANNISTER STAFF WAS DIRECTED. TO PREPARE A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA WITEI PARTICULAR•.ATTEN» TION, GMN .TO BUILDING SETBACKS AND THE PROPORTION OF OPEN SPACE AS BUILDING HEIGHT INCREASES, BY THE FOLLOWING"VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Winchell, Kenefick, Porter, Schumacher, Bauer "4 NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Greer `4- 11-A-80 -- P.C. -; 11 4 '{- L'h^3\7lNW.w..++nw Mri.M.4ZW 6{K i�'°'��1 nw{tsRxya:.u::,;r. +.:.T.Y:s?J:xB" t ,• usra,^i`a:'.yu►Y4 rirtt..R.n\isa.rwf h �1 "M Ni r iyy :t , "1 � ti;37' Ri:d►r.1:5��� Cl Yli� �r� �r +, k � `4 �yT,r " ` i�f.�t; I�'.' i ���J" t 1��Y • \.: +� j� l,�4 G'.: 1'94'� "�`" li�"t��. +'t .� � ti^:Y +4° ►�}4•�'�`�yj�,'{y����,7�:Y�a�;% ,,d4.'.� • 1� k� i.i I:is �, ++tt i,1 +� �7�;y +,t `' of i t x +�ti�� � y , 3�� 14 ��+ 1: ' 9f� { 1'r�: {; ',r���tbi <�` .tr,t r { �. j . `='1 ! �i a }14.r; y „ tt ,tti`rpy, vlE. ,° T.•r.� L'r(:'".. G ?f..� �r.tla+ •ir;t�k'`l t'� :,�i.y ee r ...i'.Y •r.y.�r ;'.,,� ,. ., �:,3 e-t3 � ,.e•z• 'rp � � �4 TT �+ f tr a1'•Y N t, }4+ �, �ji�e7� i�S� t i k�1�.�,.. f ��y., �..gr r l( ,ti q .�.yp+`��„2{;�i'Y'� '�Fl �;7fi�;t+f"iP i�-�5,3'ti�kf. '• �' �'..c 1`.i!` T•,:t.,y � :T'�'td,,•�4ty+;y 1� �'�'�'r y�,+� .+.t�✓S'f•j����f�:..t�.. h�.,�.� ?F"�' y'!+, 'C,� y.( :�."� ` y►( ,.w4' `'�`F ..(.,S-g za�r t is .,�. y. '7.0 `,',�i }y, ,,.' 4�' 1 tt �A�` 'jy( vl}i 7 f. t' J, v f,'. F r. F• Y:?! ;�t 'pia £1 '- t'2 i ; + `��f r.h/], $ts�•.#+sr, {{J}}k.a' Y. .�}y aV.' 4j}y�tj r'� y 4 .Y� .}��M2 "iy; �rr',/�i} C{ {(/ 1 Y} �'t �.:ifi}i,.S{.,j'i i1, rll I'I�,�(f' .��,. � f t. S. ,f � .1 [ A"� �: -f .K�f Y '.� 'r�: �� f;��ly��,F`'!�•tlY}ag 3Y Y�'x7• {}. },r���.4a.,:�� �' �li� F 71t'��\j.gib gy.i{�t!3���!'�; 1'+�•;•ifi�7(1�[/.� ,{Tf S1 ti�! �}, ��y<�'� �i�ry4�f ♦1 >;�! S•3• r+ T�.s4� i't•li� t,t ii�-t..�.�'�. «LY � .x.v_.�_l:Y.�i / .t: AA.I'i,rt l..k t d�tir1:�'l'.}'�d'.Jn,..i: _ 1��t� !'1Si,t��. --- 1 r {, r �� ?._ �� �.� ' � ;„. F �r 7 art. �. { � r �'.. ;.• �;. "{ r c.••i 3 ► �+ �* + ICE- �. 1ti�p$', �"' ' rK t �{ �"' :r��;ti �•. 4^ �i� �' ��•� W o s � .s #t;��h�`.1!t'��r��t)`} y5,r i '+'�m�t j`.��~r�'�� �y'�,�i4t'• #� � 7 ;����4�� � � +4p �. . .• `� Y+ •�iiaS �� � a � +�Jr,•� 1f� ,� i�",���t� 5F • "U. :t {f�'�ti.�i (�..4y,_.y�l:,;�krlj�''pYJ'i �`• � #/} f et� .dt •s. .�:;. .k .�� .ft'+ �� °"d �� i�'S 'S�`� :�.� . C���`i.Si .�, �.."9 SKri • t`9 j 'tJ{rY•� '� {,;yy+':}I"'. �. { ,[s` 3'� .t.a. j+t � �£ 'y /A• r'��� ,.1 .¢ ;, t1� t •�[� � P �e<�C � 1. b I r iV .i j .'�,r r..�'1 � Sf,�,'i' �r .'£S +l' • ;� "'�� / ' 'r6W.1 F ��..1. G,Y �••,. Y � Minutes, H..B. Pla,s sing Commission November 9 , 1980 - f' Page 5 `a :.:i L�! Items 1 (b) and 1 (c) It was noted that letters had been received from the blola Development Corporation and the Huntington Beach Company re- questing that the areas between Twelfth and Z%renty-first Streets and the ;area bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Lake Street, i Delaware Street, and Atlanta Avenue not be redesignated as med- ium density residential, but that they should be left as originally depicted high density residential or put into the vinitor-serving category. Discussion followed. A . MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY PORTER RECOMMENDED THAT THESE AREAS BE DESIGNATED AS VISITOR-SERVING; LOTION FAILED BY TIIE* FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Bauer NOES: Winchell, Porter, Schumacher ABSENT: None ABSTAIN:: Greer ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY PORTER ATTACHMENT A WAS ACCEPTED AS AMENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:: AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Porter, Bauer NOES: Schumacher ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Greer, Winchell Attachment B: Commissioner Porter discussed the wording an ^age 111 in regard to the proposed extension of Bolsa Chica Street and suggested that that reference be stricken. Ile aisu requested that a fourth item 'be ,added on Page 47 where the discussion of status of Pacific Coast highway is made. This addition would state that billboards along Pacific COa3t Highway are prohibited. ON NOTION BY BAUER AND SECOND BY WINCHELL ATTACHMENT B-1 WAS ACCEPTED AS AMENDED ABOVE BY COMMISSIONER PORTER, BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Bauer VOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Greer t The Commission and st.iEf discussed the type of permitting process; under which development in the coastal xane should occur. The commissioners had no amendments or revisions to ouggest for Attachment. B-2. -5- 11-4-80 - P.C. r , ' ,...+} vM r..•t,-rr y..r.l-••.1{9r,r'• eat l4w.y.Y •l�j,,,��i fi:.�g-.V+J'• • • aw,.v f•n°.•v. 4'+t'.TA:: .. ,. ..{l..Iwl.o .., J.. ..:�: . ...'/'/.,.d4L�:. ... .... .'� 't a1:1NJvi:aanr Q.iw.�..u.r+vs wrr.+wwr.w..w+..+.+....... 1 t r I f .t q 1 T ai - --- ---_------�—.�_._._�.._____...�....�.....•...�,.,r....n.r.,n.r.r.e•.,rre7ar_..r7�ltsmT7'>a'sleai5evn � 1 t ? " yj � y�) i• ! , � i i � f t � � r i.� � f ,+�' f, ."��' :.,t,"� c�,����� t s• t }t � �y, '� A ( t. ` ► .fit. �� �` t Y { k a` � i:l• } �.� ��� S � ���y �+s � C' �► t ''fit 'c (, �� '� � �; ..�L,,St '�`. .�" !xj'' 4.. < r'�r, ° �'�.' fp t.� F � !' .3 � �R� t. � ?�' � tp v,! � � ,��s�►r 'y ��. l.. '{�l], 'h t 1 � •�� � �f ,�'�. ,�'.S � f�`';'1s , � y� �` tl. 1 R t I' .• ,s�• �L R f„'wfy'f ,•)'7� �f� ��, 4 �. .7• { .'.f t• � :t�4 t 'FJill . .� •�"t ?, .tti;�t►.`�j. �F t;. :��:' ° . rr :''` �'�` .s x#�"� }�j Jt Syt, � i' ! .� �;' Y .r. • Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission ' November 4 , 1980 Page 6 -------._._.__ ON MOTION BY BANNISTER AND SECOND BY DAUER ATTACHMENT B--Z WAS ACCEPTED AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Greer Chairman Porter read into the record an additional policy change, 8 (e) on Page 157, Water and Marine Resources, to "encourage" rather than "require" mitigation measures to be taken prior to approval of any new or expanded seawater pumping facilities to "minimize" rather than "prevent" damage to marine organisms due to entrainment, in accordance wiLh federal and state law. ON MOTION BY KEi:EFICK AND SECOND BY DAUER ATTACHMENT B-3 WAS ACCEPTED AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Kenefick., Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Bauer NOES: Bannister ABSENT: None ABSTAINS Greer Staff pointed out.-further minor .changes. in wording which had been made-to comply with direction the Commission had previously given on the element. ON MOTION: BY BANNISTER' ANU SECOND BY 3AUER THE COMMISSION ADOPTED THE MAP DEPICTING THE COASTAL ZONE DESIGNATIONS AS MODIFIED, BY THE FOL- LOWING VOTB: AYES:. Bannister, Kenefick, Porter, `Bauer NOES.*, Winchell, Schumacher ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Greer ON .MOTION BY. KFNEFICK AND SECOND BY WINCHELL THE COASTAL ELEMENT WAS APPROVED BY THE ADOPTION. OF RESOLUTION NO. 1270 AND RECOMMENDED FOR ADOVTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Bauer V NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Greer r ' A brief discussion between the Commission and Mr. Jack Chalabian in regard. to his parcel in Huntington Harbour ensued; Mr. Chalabian was directea. to pursue the redesignation of his property with the City ' Council vt its hearings on the Coastal Element. r The Commission recessed a;: 8:45 p.m. and reconvened at 8:55. . w -6-• 11-4--80 P.C. •��'`"�•'�•�1�C{,:'�ii.:Sl'I•Sf jIC51h1<t.1„Fhwrrt♦-/M {,+•ra.Ulli•.h4k- •.j(,:.5w•.^a'1: ,.:.�;.3'L:.:`.5... .�'.. Y. A' .wwrV+..9.Mwl Yrwe......w•+ =7t?J'v:•�'•:"r1' ••4C..+..».a1:i'+:i r''•'7;,rriavj^;L`�l:Y.1 1» 1:1 -s..c'.'x.a.rtn.•a- s r , .. [�'aJ,a.Fiw•Y•M'IfIG.:Y 7. ♦+Y3±#I!`•f. M.w Jf M.iJY„4y...>l.♦I:..w:1'1 iR::�•..JI•" • �;. 1L •1 6 1 "Y E •r ( M p w 1 rf, . Q W w wy i x i y I {1qC: (}(-M30Qi0Q.9t]11 o8('{'i4; �Q _ , file M -- 1 'r µ F L 'M •�, �$ fi'i'. .���h�'�" ,•'� �� / A4j1� i i {� ��� ��" j# 1 � � r' UN t «Pi c ' QJ rf ar O •.t �•01 �.y go � b b m U .n a C � H .ro "1 9-4 164 .. a Nw 44 / r ::fin'{' °' �' _.w NM�• �� aNc� xc�Aboa 43 All cl I f 77 14 OV - � r r �- w M ?- ... 7r ry,ri.���it4.V L.+tYarWvf,.wa...��rr•a+wv.«.-sy#Y1tn.....K:r..avw.M.',:.on p�xr�o u,•"N�S C'.':K;.7.:4:w.[,.7.�`..n'i:..S14:}.AU,4�1:L1:YtY..�'1',WiSR:i�.a371�++�,k•CYi7,3+fiHwgsrr+.�++. t fs { SIC cofm `$ CT WE SAT, SMUTTED 3N Viiqllrlr= AS OF U/12/80 .I I Ji rj�flf•{�Kli"'7�j74�v��.�. AYI++r•�.+»..w'�+•W�.rT1r1Y1M�• F. • '. .. •.;"•:.... tt,X:t.S W:tt�ez+sKt,pt,v:a•cav '- �. 1 1'i014YA�wYM�.y� 4t .. - { r,-fir.^+t •i;+ �{ .. s �'� � � s r rS d � h''s I•� t! yy a i '�. CS { y •.s ¢ ! FEE C;� ��.� 1� '� D P i t TO: City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission MOM: Local Coastal Plan -- Citizens Advisory Committea DATE: September 17, 19BO SUBJECT: DRAFT COASTAL ELEMENT After nearly two years, the Committee has completed its study of the Coastal Element. an an average, two meetings were held each month. The Committee's reeotnmendations are based on study sessions, public hearings, staff input and guidelines front the State Coastal Canmisoion. The Committee approved nearly 100 recommended policies, of which the majority are incorporated in the staff's draft Coastal Element. Only 12 of the recommended policies in the nine issue-areas trere not Included An the draft Coastal Element or were not worded to reflect the intent of the Committee. These are summarl2ed below. IAftmeatlan and Shore r,s &c.4 ---- Sunset Aquatic Park facilities need to be expanded to provide a wider range of use by the general public. U.yJnav ' t ea -- Encouragement of additional restaurant and . . hotel/motel accommodation should properly reflect the adopted land use alternatives. yllsu �lr s. -- Landscaping ordinances/guide.lines need to specify suitable vegetation types for the coastal area. g No changes. Environmentally SoneitivQ Habitats ..., lnclude. reforence to the Bolsa Chica ' as an environmentally sensitive habitat and in clude ounty the agencfen. encouraged to partieipnte in e3nhaacemQnthofcthese arson© of F•n -- Encourage screening and landscaping of the existing Edison "Power , plant facilities independent ,of future expansion plans. t1ouallM -' Expansion of houaing reahabilitation rramsto mobile: howea .but should include lov- and moderate-incomeuld housi g . Usseited . nubile home zoning to retain existing mobile home areas and to encourage mission's additional areas for mobile homers. Follow More closely the Coastal Com- i guidelines for the inclualon of low-. and mode3rate income housing In ndw residential development,, Community Fac�1Lu � k �g -- The •Com=ittee made :Four additional recowacadations: 1. The nix-.lane proposal for Pacific Coast Highway should be o pposed. 2. Preserve°the Pacific Electric railroad right-of-way t Street as a transit corridor. 9 Y parallel to Lake 1. Encourage the use of -nark"ing areas outside the coastal zone and the Use-'of alternative transportation modes to coastal areas. N}} :it���Z'i�K6.1.1*.fii�Dlanv..,.+•+-�..,...._�-r�H...w.�+��,�'N,�v.��.rY+«+....... ..... .. , .•i • -t ' i Ali.`, s {. 1 i �. �� � t i � ��t ti t•, i t ' 1 t Page Two 4- Support OCTD's recommended location for its transpartaticn center at Pacific Coast High-.ray and Lake Street. AgAR str on --.- No changes. The Committee has only one suggested revision for the portion .of the report covering background, analysis and conclusions for all of the issues-areas. It recommended to expand the description of the nolsa Chica on page 67 of the draft Element. The Committee has further taken a position to recommend Lund UV& Alternative No. 1, "Low Intensity." five opposed and one person abataini, The vote was seven supporting, Attached are the 'ccmplete resolutionq approved by the committee re- garding the reccimmendations discussed above. The 17 members of the Citizens Advisory Committee appointed by.` the City Council represented a wide range of groups, organizations and lndividuals.with special. interests in coastal zone issue�a. The Amigos de 9olsa Clslca, League 'of Women Voters, the Environmental Board the to taier of Commerce, the Parks Commission, the Redeve.XO - meat Council, t�ie .Home Council, the Western Oil� and Gas Association and the Planning Commission were reprose:ct6d on the Commi m tted. The eight other Committee eMbers represented this public at 2sr4 e. The Committee at this time would like to take the 'o. the City'$ nepa�rtzent of Develcpmsnt Services for its .thank to this Committee. s help jp �TfMwfLKN...rrMww.. r'.;:`�'"�!'f`1 Pf1'+•+}��.'MlM�r!..-. . y KrIE i RESOLUTIONS OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PLAN - CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDGVG CHANGES TO THE DRAFT COASTAL ELEMENT Recreation and Shoreline Access Recommend to the Planning Commission inclusion of the following policy in the ,:oastal Element: Recommend maximt.tri expansion of Sunset Aquatic Park facilities emphasizing Multiple sites including the following-- boat launch ramps, small boat rentals, boat slips and storage for use by thepublic._. Visita r Serving Facilities Recommemd to the Planning Commission that Policy So be changed to the following: Encourage the provision of additional restaurants and hotel/motel acoommodations In liming with the o3ernoiive chosen by the CItZ► Council. Visual Resources Recommend to the Planning Commission Inclusion of the following policy in the Coastal Elements Establish, landaaaping ordinances/guidelines specifying suitable vegetation types for the coastal area. Water and Marine Resources None EnvironmentoliZ Sensitive Habitats 1. Recommend to the:Planning Commission that Policy 9 be amended as followst Preserve and enhance environmentally` sensitive habitats, lnclu'd' 1 tha Bolso { Chico which is within the sphere of influence of the City of nFiu tIngtcn'Beacti.� i 2. Recorrmencl to ter Planning Commission that Policy IOb be amended as followss Promote thin participation of CouDtyp State and federal agencies in the e(du m ement and mdnfencme of environmentally sensitive habitats by actively pursuing funding from the California Coastal Cotservoncy and other State and federal agencies to develop and maintain landscaped buffer ,areas around the edge 9t the wetlands trom Mach Boulevardto.tho.SWa.Ana.E3L= mouth•- En.._.W i Recommend to the Planning Commission inclusion of the following policy in the Coastal Elements Encourage screwing of existing Edison power plant facilities via planting of trees and shrubs pursue strategies to this end with Southern California Edison mn Copany. ` t•T .t:; :+a A.ay :n�+.+.�. ..5:+'w..":::::'z�..:'.nc�. .. ......i.....a.w+...-»., ...- .....«.a..-+...-.........a.rur•<.......•.�.�....��...«. ...._ .,... .�.. _ ;..1. ,fit���7..a�4:`1711 z - T • 0 HousiM I. Recommend to the Planning Commission that Policy ISc be amended as follows: Investigate the feasibility of implementing an expanded grant program Ur mmbi'l04vna. for low- and moderate-incomes s� rehabilitation, inci` uding mobile homes. 2. Recommend to the Planning C=misslon the Inclusion of the following policy in the Coastal Element: Through mobile home zoning, retain existing mobile home areas, and encourage the addition of other areas zoned for mobile homes, 3. Recommend to the Planning Commission that Policy Be be amended as follows: Require that 25 percent of all new residential projects of-5-17 or more units be.affordabie to low- and moderate income households as deffncd.by.the Clty's, Housing;Element. New residential ra seta'of leu`= flan' 17 Be m _r a ' er-unify' fee In Ifeu o ercent o t e ro ecf e a or a to ow- and m rate��nc`arn'a Pious o • rent un Eye] exc o This policy., roan the reiprements Community Facilities (. Recommend to the Planning CanmissIon the inclusion of the following policy in the: : Coastal Elements Recommend that the number of mdstingtraffic lanes be Maintained on Pacific CoFst Highway within City boundaries;, including Usa Chlea, and that safety arrangements for pedestrian .Vehicles such, as landscaped .medians, speed ;controls,'and enforcement be► instituted and that the sIx-(aping proposal be " + o ed ln'order to s rt'alternate'forms of tram portanan. 2. Reconvticnd to the Planning'Commission the inclusion of the following policy In the Coastal Elements Recommend to .the Council that.the Pacific Electric right-of-way dal k . S. Lake Street be reserved to the Ctt j boundar as a transit�carildor. lei to F: 3. Recommend to the Planning Commission the inclusion of the following Coastal Elements ng policy In the Encourage the use of and the develo parking areas outside the coastal zone for passenger cars pment of alternate transportation modes for bee..h users. j 4• Recommend to the: Planning Commission the inclusion of the followin !Coastal Element: g policy in the f TO express preference for thr: OCTD's recommended location concept at, Pacific Coast High and Lake. The center on that site should be designed nearer Atlanta and related to the Orange/Atlanta east-we circulation pattern. r: �sy��, r+ 41�'�'� �� Yrlt� �! ���+}. .�i{'p ,(/t�f� .C .z�.�� Y ��ry�l,�,r1+�lt��"'� ,Y ..Ir��''.;t ��r�'"'��fi���("2 ��7� ��j.�r{'ii�l•,"ya',% ,'��j �±}�t; �97"�Y4'++'+�1�.,��,�1y •lS �• ���� ��� � ''1.r� ��' p,. :17� •��t` �, � � � t { �A � �� � .�� �i �+ 1t � ;��''�' y 1� • f(*;i,{,� tN [� .Y�Ir'. "tk��',�� z} �7 �� � ��� � _ r�.' �li�tr:. � '�,..�t ,c� 1 , {�� +r :a �n.• 5,� ! ��t. i',rrr rr r r 'v • • ' 1 •• + • • • : r r a • w Y + w + 1.- •• • • • • . • / r� . • • • •'1 • • • ••. r • . . • mmmmmrmn= • 1 • • • • / • NMI i S. 1 . .r: -;-. j r y'�.•�N} ',i { r1 S � 't{�L. • Y Y t f� .'i� S :+�r S l� r F�'•. �� * '. 4 r s .Ir , � 74 rr 7 3 eM""�. •., v i ! •` i , 'i + w•.' + �4S . • w + 1 K 1,4+� +•r , k�'r y � y ., + k '� !, �ry 1lyr ti !.},�' 1Yf y, +i �i 1 � +• , .,� 1*� ,T. trt �. 11.A� ;• y ''1 f .. h"t�' ., a FYI- � �f ra •r � �.(�� fr Y1 ra r ! .J "� r '� •• '�.•:+ t �'".; � r+.. 1 MY.•� �Y.' � r � r � r• 1 n, , �T/1 i �1 ,� { .. ; .,/�"' `� y fit'{' A �.t .f 4. ri, .t t t `''4 e t1 �' • y : 7t +Ary q t �,t • 5 � i�, � + t 6 1 � ii.{' ddd �.r ,, �sL.".G r • 1• +. �„� � � �, 'l.► \ � `•'+� s ,r;��'4 [4 ys .,►,+r t rA r + (k1 - �-,�� r +tllr tia '(R �•e-�N".� � l r �li �[ �A Y-y .7.1.y �Ar'����. 1, �! 5T • }F rt'r ` t A .' r ,S. �) + ,,� n. 5�y���t .}�• ? 1 ,r� : w��n ��i r4, [ � r .� ty � � �� j�i � 9�a a{ �I^ r t y .. y.t.,�, • i .t 4 r �{ i,A� /+• fir '♦•�1�k". �1 1 1 t* ^� �� 1��'"Y .�1'� r� r} � •'• t� ?r �zttll.,T ,x��� � � ��'t, *� ,,y+; �� ,. �'A t •t +s '�1 i)S- � ti r t cfr� t n �y�,yt f..l ,�iki� � i +a. (� 'its; `7 t � �•�•,�� {'�' ►t, , + r , rrl '���74r`. �t,�ptt Ewa �' a1 �. = f t,t,t 1'• 1(r ht 1 'y.,c .1� � ` �.��{' L�tL Sla� 4t�• r , �C r'� �, rr:itrlt�{ ,;t"r�r v �t��, ,,t �. ! �1 ,r.'r�_yti'4rf�r.h� rrp.! i. �t��ii 4ti ;.'i� •,,+t" 4G !."`tk,�' t�t �,�' � i �q�x � r t-,�+1�t+t�2�� � r �, i1 .tlt�4+�iat• ,r`{f�• �k_� 1�1;� ,�, y'��� ." rl � 4..'(4',�'�, �14, 'Y! j: a •s ..�'� dt?. �,� °+}-yfir '�. {+ K�Y��i�hla�rl� ♦ y�' t rt•� , ut, R a• f � , •'�r � �+t„• - ��r1 "Yr rr11� h .i�k�.'�fidY !1� � r-�, M ���� � �• ti k +� `�,�t i�n�+1'q,4 r�,�'�.Ia � �"1i [lr�n �• �'r r�► Fr l ti v; + "1 :^�?t I*t{ l � }''tkt 1 �, , ,' ` a tr �,• ;Y. 1 � , � Oi r}.'�a. ,6S' j.�` h � ` zk '� yak r { �' r �� ! „t t +.a": �l• • �'f'� t�1 �ti;,;,y� t . '��"��{' t � � �, `�.,�ti ?' r �^ �6.r {� � i 4r���+7� y'a"� +�i `:� +4 k �,t' ,t rt��y, �:p � Y•' r`,/l���. •.a�/�'ltr {`., q �a` y .�'1,i"y'r�� �1 . t to #tb 1�� `�t{``'�ti�>:.,,y� �Y s1S y,i �v{r ��ii��.4 �".�r:L k lhr� !4r t4i«•,r,'Y1'x' "'�a ti5 ti•'�la " ,�,>7'4�"a�. fu T ti• t y4. l+'s .�yFr! yi'` {t y )$J f� � +� ,����•ir✓Nr.JY`_�`�' •r f `•' � � 'i 4NF � t�r;. S 41� f ��rrt 1 ' '.; -r y � 41 4J1y i • }} r fr[ fi' « r � � 1 '► �,r tt � • ,��i-`'� t a `�; � `C�' u [n- i '}•� .{ �i.�, • j ' ,/"� 3y� 4 �. r ;�`di t v .t?! `� + +,,-t 1 4 �� �.{i 7' fs " ty "3 •y,� 4. '� r t 1 v E�Gi'�f. i i. "� 'F+ .a! .�< < .+,1 74Y�:1 ' +F .,'�r, d "♦ J� �1 T. �i ` t;+, Y�lr rt�: � 1t v�. • .L. .i•'�i�r *�.i. ,�/�+1i�l1�` 1'ha � !`�' 41 ��;�#;f u;t,. ��f I' +,t����.k •'r �•'. ',�� �� , '11L"•,'rk� .3}11�1j,���'#tii�l�,t'ti�FN�j �.��y ± Y4t�•1.1 yy 1. ri-{ 4�! tT. � � '$ 1 (, 1rr+ �. •4 91 � • ti' r1 1 < � [T �t<'2.3 .,C�•�l�[k ,'4'r.�.h,r,', �,. 4�1-.n T•,�t'1 { i .�:r��T it �A,t�i�i'""�,�r yt. .!: � y ,+r Z. ',L4, !C �Ir..+t't. 'i;'�•�!.t.\?t.;� !�,•NN_1.k \r .� "'T--T•F+'•.l i' i..,•r i.�t .:tiN[t '�- r '�+__ •-- r" i:r'.`l..S.y,.1:SQ::,.—;.i-"•r t :'+' .w' !tr �..�.M''C. ♦ _ S P v r j, Ai L J.�.i •t RLM PROPERTIES LTD$ •.t •,` ��:d�,*,;r� :? ' N1E1 FAST PLA)RFN(.'E.►�•k:NtIF I1u1VNl:�', l.wl.1}'ro112V1e1�C � �Y rrc.�:rItlovr.14i3!r,ur•a�1 c✓lC Cy'C41 �Spw,8 December 5,f 19'80 Honorable Members of the Council and Staff City of Huntington Beach, California RE: Local Coastal Plan Designation Huntington Beach Inn This letter draws your attention to the LCP draft document as it pertains to City Property, namely, the area known as the Huntington Beach Inn. It is our opinion that the LCP, as presently proposed, fraezes the existing uses into perpetuity with little opportunity for increased revenues to the .City. It, also denotes a special classification .for the property which is not applied to any other property in the Coastal Zone. Our opinion is that something of' a mixed-use nature is more appropriate since .an evaluation of development proposals would then be. possible through a site plan review process. Our specific recommendations were presented in a „letter from the Huntington Beach Inn staff to the LCP Advisory Committee dated August 28, 1980, which was also sent to you. We would like; to speak to you in conference, or your representative,: ... prior to Council enactment of the LCP for the Huntington Beach Inn site. Please advise in the near future if this is possible since,we .understand the goal is January 1, 1981 and so little time remains. Prudent review at this time will make financial and planning considerations later much more adaptable to the City's' interest and desires. While we understand that changes Could be made even aft%r the LCP is adopted, it would seem that incorporating a plan now, wit4 some latitude, and yet which would still be under the strict control of the City, would be a more expeditious course for all concerned. •Very truly yours, y • Robert L. Mayer RLM:t.in �" •{.+',;}74':R4irirwvw.a.r..s.�r+.++.......r.. .+.. ..ra,c.t.�r t ,...... •b............. »............M—.,... .-. .,Y��k,�;i. ra4 �! :y.7l.,S'..S'.5.: ...n•.Y4.S,w.+.... „ru•lYi����L,;.".T r , . R � a � t f �y^ � r '�5• t �M*' .��� v� ' i ' < ' � 4 � err MR , a y. August 28, 1980 r : local Coastal Program Citizen Advisory Committee Department of Development Services C r� City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 • Huntington Beach, California 92648 RE: Draft Coastal Element, UP Derr Committee: This letter is written regarding the 45-acre parcel of C)ty-owned.. land In the Coastal Zone between Huntington Avenue and Beach Uoulevard, inland of Pacific Coast Highway: . Currently"the Huntington Beach inn and Driftwood Beach Club Mobile Home Park and Golf Course occupy this property. The current General Plan designation for the property +is "Commercial : Mixed Develop- t ment.11 This is .compatible with"all current uses while.also providI69 some opportunl- ties for flexibility In the future..' Our preference is to retain this designation if �. possible. In tight of the Draft Coastal Element, however, the following comments are presented. The proposed land use designation for our site In the draft document is "Recreational/ ' Support Commercial." We find that .this is recommended in all three alternative t development strate 'ies, and surprisingly it-is the only area in the Coastal Zone so . designated. We be?Ieve that such a designation Is not in the best interests of the City in that it contradicts and precludes specific proposed policies of the Coastal Element. Page 122 states that this designation proposes the following: "The City's intent is to encourage recreational uses that are open to the public: and that capitalize on the mild climate and beach location, including but not limited to tennis, golf, swimming and suibathing facilities and athletic fields. Support facilities such as restaurants and hotels will be encouraged as part of a coordinated development but'will be limited to approximately 30 to 40 percent of the total area of the site." Policy 5a (page 154) states that the City should encourage the provision of adds- tional restaurants and hotel/motel accommodations. ItIIA PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HUNYrNOTON VCACH.CAUroRNIA WAS iaM+`.�.HM r��!rt^,�'1it 1t'.e+nw-.,......r�....«.•«....�wr,.•v+«x.:..,,.•i.w..�iR?'v�:.:tlF'.: .i,..• , l��r:,.:.•:' ,J.,'..'....xC.4...Y..E:,��r.«>:.',�t\wc.t;t+tuMnrw.rtM..Iwo...w.r«.w.rn++w......-+....�.r•... r , f MEN PAGE TWO Local Coastal Program Citizen Advisory Committee August 26, i98O Policy 15c (page 165) states the need to investigate the feasibility of an expanded grant program for nubile home rehabilitation. Policy 15f (page 165) suggests a program be developed to provide for the continuation of affordable housing units. These conflict in the following ways: I. The proposed land use of Recreational/Support Commercial limits the expansion potential of the HBI by its coverage requirements. 2. ror expansion to occur, new commercial and residential uses are needed on site to carry the hotel and conference center through the non-tourist season. 3. Recreational open space, now comprising approxima}tely 20% of the site,.,. would require the. demolition of-either mobile home sites or hotel facilities If such were to be expanded. 4. Demolition would also be required if any new'public recreational facilities were to be constructed since only the small 3-par, golf course currently exists., RESPONSE ' We balieve':that expanded visitor-related commercial services best balance the:'lntent and policies of the Coastal Element. This "ls particularly important because of the existing uses, the,unique location of the property, and. the' potential -for a comprehensive development due to the size of _the parcel. for expanded visitor services to be- feas.1ble, a O xed-use commercial designation is required to support such a hotel-restcurant investment.:. This will also require a lesser percentage of land for recreational use and a greater acceptance.of a small-scale 'urban or village development concept. Various alternative concepts also assume appropriate relocation resources have been Identified for tenants In the mobile home park* . Policies in the Overlay section of the LCP also speal; to this issue. Future development considerat{oits, therefore, will .1 have to weigh the trade-off advantages of preserving the existing housing resource In perpetuity versus .art orderly and equitable change in land use to accommodate expanded visitor services. ' 1 i The document also assumes. a need for new hotel and tourist services when, In fact, only a limited market currently exists to support established, businesses. Mara accurate surveys of specialty retail and hotel occupancy figures are needed. In our experience, with substantial new capital investment and operational procedures, the 11111111111 Will I'll Ss ��"�tttS:JS�+�Mt+�'w'..'n"'.•'��,..—.wr...�,.hwa-owhW���:lye".I.w�.:.:.w.n::i:3.,i',i.:t".:.'vl..• a};41vf_w W'.w)a..mn*-.i:.G.r4b4F7eFa:1..L'4r'twY-L'ILLYR]wNa�s+•ww.+a.wylr�.w�^•^'Y'•� ., } l At Idi ?+l s.r• � r} i1 # }/ l tdl\It >• • L- ►� n .r ('«! } v^ 17t t " • 11 r '�+��+.. ��•}�,� n i' 'l �ju �j'� �-,,a } fig,, 'i'- {�� �+ N } �;,. "' 41#c ktf�•s`r r�► i�"tf� t�( �f ;��T � '►i.lt,�t, 4>�� A � F,[}�+ ` �,. `��"�'f,`r}`� 'ilj� �� L��p (���j$� '� � t�F�t �t{�L .��;�'� '' �,"y y�• � � � ' ♦( is ���` z ,•k .• t L �� t ! j ' � ��� � r+�}��« � . h r ti PAGE THREE Coastal • ! August 1 1� ± • • averaging f occupancy '30-40% this winter as has been the history of, this property. For an expanded on r! to warrant such an investment and carry the project through the weak winter season. RECOMMEN , y we request that �thfs. parti�ular' 45-acre. site'be designated In a. consistent mann"ar. , .. Serving Commercial." Additionally, an element of .."Off Ice-Residential" on an Inland portion (6pp' roximately-'.15 . BeachBo'ulevard 1 . . . .. to implement a •e" environment .tosupport 1 . . . ' ropriate balance between uses can be achieved when specific market and design studies become available.at,tention and re ns are appre tat d. if we can be of regard,any further assistance In t6is . Normin B. Reed cc: Hr. Charles •. City Manager City Council Members City Attorney i r; r r� :, •iti r•� f: t R ki LI• i L ";�.� ►t + r �+ ny 11 Vy� 41ij %'rp:�,t s,rr •r i t) w <. �7�. O+:A].',4 �ri'-`1,! Lf<,• �y�'�.'�'.: {.��-• �i 1�+ ;'fir{_�.'�t1"'� f #�`� t� �,f+�,. t,liL #�S, f �* S ',�, tt,��ki�,M+•t r y ,�4�� r.. u •, y t 4. t ��� rl � t { t flit" ,i;`�, 9Akr4 ,' T , ..r "`a.a'�. �� .'i'�'•,'�� ,� }i� i��p ''� �; r "h 14� �� !{ ',�,�`'1�;�: �7 �� ;',r rf;° f'�' "��•.#,rf� � M,. y �{ ,- ,i - �, .",� • r J �(/.�4y L'*. Iw � � �e!k r ,•• e4 �' ,\ �.'�.SA •ti. Y� L Y>,.'- 4 ti!'f 1'r r'.� ss" h ,.� ��` �"�? � *�a 4 y �t }}bb 1^f .'�+��••r��, �k L((� 1,.y,7 ■ �r t ° y4f r ` � 7 + ♦,• y t.. t ';. ,1/ .r. .,:.+ r -�.. f 1 (y , P�'. + S AS?11 i7 A \ �+y•,�.� /6;. 1\./. f �. , ! . �1 ry 1 , ,, 1.�..1 i } •:. .ti 'btt �:r�1lfi r L 1 .� 1 '�{44r \ !1 N r.� , k4 , r`�.'Y i•� 31h �.+ 1 r• i { > / + ..hl 1 C ti: u�d '} ... .^,�,, �,�' ., '1. ! r rJ r. 1 r �" r ti i,• N. + • { 'L!,• L i�!� �:.}„{.S »H. : t rA{ ! '•��'• i('l- '�.� �- {�; y {.r 1i ".,, { {'{ Ztr X{ w;t3 ,i ..,, :rR r tri LK,'�A., r •'r !.rY + • f . ^' r� {r jih }a Y p , '!i. >ti , r , f��� Si . "�.:.t �}� y :�'� ' r lh 1+"fj• � r � J y Z.i# r ry � A.y • �'•�' 'rl . ,J`itr•, Y � IS. t � k� ' iShi St: 4, �1 r r �i t' iR � � � +s•.�r� e 1 �tw 1 L tl T�rL 0 � r l 1 � ,ypt L�- ti �'tt,y � •+ �,1 A r +t,r �� � Y x l� •c!� ,'� �. Yi r �. 1 } �i Irti�, �+1 � 4 1:., ��.'a :i r, "'' Sq 1r114�(( , I � +, , i I/��t. kr�� t► tx •+, ,y�� t y a �;{`y t�+}' r rt '' r.i"ti r � RI`,! a ry5�, ^+ s�7 l .� 1 � r �,. , �p t �' h y'F� +1� �' "t k` r!, trjp!� ,f r�l� �yt��,, 5 }�1 1 ^�? t i 1' ,� • � �; � t , ✓'�F'"�(w�' rv �' „ .. j 11r A1( hii t 1"+,i a" I'l S ;1+3 b +. ft�t #.' e r t S • ` .1 •f' { ny+r s„I} f if l+t.. �ti d 1Rft 7 +, 4,� - t i; t ! �'k� }1• t r./ �4.� +a '3 7 l � {,� ���j„ +� RrJytA p i t'i��',� �'�'.,•� } f .� t �r;'1. , 4 4 , U r, �� �r 4� i+n• !,� � r,, y), d� ,t � �S � � �. a ,.l rf�, c � tt_. � k p,'j , k'.�t 1� s 'S � � J i,,t„]' t i •7t w I► iR' + �^'r✓ ����'�•� ; , ,a'•r ►r � . •� 3 �! 'A 1� , I A , • ,r t A jJ - e�,,t+r, Ia lr h ,f i j�ll}r t .. �'r �y 47'.,{ , Y • 1� Y + 1 4r `f' 1; r � dd 4 .f j Y" Ya ,+ � !!1 r -NL 'b 4,, ►it a fr"" . is i �r'�. -`•fci ��y kl 7�'• �N tia t tt .yt�t �1 a�,� '�' e' ';l xu, ,�►` �i 4 r t� s,)y} �};f ti �y� '(�Y �. ' •',� ; �f j '.'� i'� ► >Tf `i'' ,� .i �t'!tt • `�. �o • .i�r ,{,,, ,r { ,��� �+r � ,t' 1��;�#t(i+J`.. !�'; ,�."1 �'1�V'�,1�1il k�l,�7.7 r,-�y��•y';'.^,' �,,�".•",t"C�. .��'�� ? 4•. �3 k i�+��,+ , ....� >,!q�d '��"�'�d�1�� '�wy.k�•;,�{ ''37 T�� 1M�°t •j+ 1 :+�� .+,�1y.4�'r S } t'•tyr..: .{ t 'Ih .}� f ::'.4.;..,7 ;. .;� °v r �ir .... t:;: :T� ,.►t .t 1 +, f_p`1t++ ,µ . 1•i. 7. ti .r h i" ;1� lL• t �ty{ "' iA l![('ai�ci; ��wP`.tr!��5�' �y�} ►i,'��J r .,4 %y;}lfJt'C^" rF} 1j�{1M•`'�( '• P '1 +lijlrj,rS;� 11''/ ht .1f �'t }{ y„�.i rt' if V�1• '1• .'1s4', 11y., +ruR .'� it1,,.j� 1�, ?'' i- l r "�f' �7t_ 1• � kl� �� ::{,�cr ,► 1 � ( +1,{+ ' + ' f' w b a ; tij�: , "J " +i � ��"t �Y 3 �}� ,{{Y•'• } i �{►XA '?}�ti,a j�3j"}�{ i j J, y31► {1�: r,�tiit3� y'1Z �S'3�I��ht�'Z 's. / ;{ ,,.vt7 •. :l•L,"fRr { + 1. /T ♦.J!1 ,j�l v �L r. U 'Z. .,�i ,� .t{ �ti..�}+S i .•�t�'�f..,jyr '�,� ,�)+ � .� ��� i{�j,j,• f��1;o1►��kS�.n�ap r,i`�'>ti`• � '"( lc�f�+ .�t � +w� ,q'� ' �, '"ty e:rl 'l� � 1Cly• wY� r j� �ti77}1y• C� .'�lL 4'{ 'F ,j .+r' Y Y��� �Z• IN , r {- . � !' '4ryp, f.a Or: "�, �o �Y�`� (f y S( .� �k7 �.f k��•'. .�)� �Aj 16141 ''4r+,y�.�ti<" .�•''r.;'"„'h..,i,•.r• ��r•,Ivvl++ S':'�pn," .,YIUTi� jd{"�r'r�f�}• ry�d•�?',,'. T'i •..;, 4t`.p5t'iti^.j��9��, '��, ��1 � �Y�'1�"��!.'j�',F4}�y� � art',''� '�•�'' �i .A T,�� .I� -�;n,' "l.l. �#-, �% . S �'(yl; �' � 1�'�},.^I:-'•{"1•!�,.,:� fa K �f'y J'n a '9„ f 1, i•1 ^ti . ,'s c } 1' L� 'i /{. +..1,> � '. . "r `+ ,if.i 7.a.( 'tr Frf+ •. ,Yr. ,� . , v � Ate. .R�, S"li tl' ? 'I�rF y' „' L•' "�' �' -+' ''„�'�� 4`' .,"."•�:��'. X'• � • ,--�f�'i t i`.�'r' 1. 'G: � ice. 41 J,YR n. J fa' i `�+i je�LfL.. + ta(f*•4y�? 1t �4 ► t fy•y., y» .r 1�lJ ' 'f{i..y'} } &r t•!! t,� 1t�t� (': '�1� ��r y t�4^���_, '� k,�' �'S'���s�;It t•., ;r�. •�'��,;,� ,r��t� �.t `+w� t #,r�•;f¢t, •�t' �i#i•� i���7!?�'� � 'kr � p�' npi,.,�, �r���L ayu�' � � ,�.' �1, i`••3��4�i ."t 4;i��0��' yt +e'�� '��' �ii"'�� �. �� °� r '"� .•�y � '� ��K ��I{!'� V?' j �;�. ��►:i�. �'� NNtII`F�(.d� ' U y, +�y, a k' ' '#yy,� t'' '� � I (}� �►����„',� , fit[ �''� •r `,"�' ?s't,�.• 's^ait�A�3 . 3 ,'{!� ►•+' y�•}» vt + ,. f, L.} aCtI ^`�i...1r�,; '>t., 5'S f� •�h,l• , S FFFF 11 1 t S4 k .0 i �Y l iL, nr-'d yr-.Jk t- Ayr.l;v u ttr t4 1• rc r To: Planning Coaam!as1,-/City Council From: Leo.,.ird Wrighb City of Huntington Beach 606 - 15t}a st, HB 92648 (also LaCF Staf:) .-Sub eets Downtown Lend Use k3alootion Alternative -2 in not justified YI It's. a mistake to select; Alternative 3 for the downtown core:, It a developer bought Rf property among ether Hi property, would you lest him c rezone to 114 just because it's his propertyy ant he: says he 'll maka more f monsy and will develop it faster if itte N? You can got about 100% of your opeoulatorn to infer that they anin't make a go of it without high Intensity (Most: of the: Uewnt'omn oomaerolal fi property owners livu outside the oit:y) , As Co=lasioner Jeeon Schumacher correctly ata.tesd, density Ic not the 'reason no development heaa happened on Downtown ;•lain Street (any more than density prevents the block fronting Coast Highway Prom 6th to Coldenwest ! from developing. A house was sneaked thru this year on a 0--foot: lot In the 100-blook of 10th Btroetj , The reason in both cases In that the Coastal Coazaletsion will not � allow .building until ea plan is approved. And we all know a�.t has obstruotod getting a plan approved. If Alternative 3 or Alternative 2 were proponad !'or near where you r, live, you and your follow ramidents would be very vocal against it. Suggest it to your neighbors and see what response you get. Hots can you be WLIling to inflict on others what you wouldn't want for yourself? High *'iv6s belong in areas away from hoaxes, such are Fashion Island. Suggested_ ahanRe►ss : i On the annumptlon that the Planning Commirsdion stloks with Alternatives � for the Downtown core, your deoisiona generally gore good for tho revidentical outside the Doatntown core. In this regard I 'd like to suggest 2 modifioations: 1 . 'rho bAoc6 fronting Pacific Cc-ant Highway from 6th street (inatead or a) to�; oldenwent be_ hthe_came an Alternative 1, Reasons The Townlot rosidant5@1 area begins at 6th Street. � 2 . a '4..block residential araa bounded by rd l.,ako and Wta ut bm me iva envi reel ant a set n A ternat"�"tive"t. Comza revs oner ' aomment:a Boomed to Lmply that Znd Street wo-M retain the medium donalty zoning 1t got in June) . Ransons (1 ) Development is mealua deintsity residential. (2) About 2 or 3 years ago Patti Jewett submitted a petition signed by all the property owners in this area (except for 3 oho couldn't contAct) in favor of Ili zoning, (3) 2nd Street was zonad medium density residential in June. Y !'�'*��ti;.:'; u+'Y;'.i;.t/e u:a.. .... .. ..._. .._... ........ .__...... ........ .. .... ,. ., .-. .. ....._. r.. ... ..• .. ..:,..» ... .. ' -: ..f.t:,:.t w.,x.t.•'^'^^' L. Wright to kC1CC. _ o-,1-80 »2- sand Use QelootlQn Zoleranae for the vlaws, or'othern If an unfair Proposal in made that In detrimental to a group of peopla, I can %nderstand their vooal1z1zX their anger. i Inuring the Oct. 21 hearing, after a young, rom rt from the Down" to n care area staid she'd like the view from a high arise, someono from the audience yealled for hear to go hack to Nees York City. I'm positive t:iat that csax*ont =3t from ecaaaoni o eaai,ting for the hearing tan the proposed Ads"-Beach Blvd ratone! from RI to high density. You may recall,that at the Oct., 2S hearing there was no booing, hinaing or uncomplinentmry are mark a wnile3 someone wan apoaking In, favor of•Altemative 3. You might,notiae that on the flyer ire disc tributed Joao p. 3) that we eaphaeeizeds "It's beat to be courteous at all timers -- both with those holding the hearing and with those who have different v>ews:" iC toleration nand courtesy aro to be disouasion Items„ me might alga cons lder•,,that mccA of those oupporting highoist intenal.cy have been Intolerant of the viotcm ,of others (this In no sa+y indicates aWlar attitud*a among otherx) t I.. Afteear an LOP Comitteo rye:sting. Richard Holt a(nho livers in Racl ao) was abuulve and vehanant In Inaiating that I ahoul.din't be on the LCP Coanitttett. 2. Th© reaction of one PAC number (ace p. 4 ` 3. The reaction. of anoth+ar Mo supported high Intonaity (nao pg. 5-6)* r :e s .�S'fit.r•a• r-a •. •2"• '{^ + ... :i: ..:Y'i.... ^ .,.i,.r i.1w+:1-,r.i, , ...t. .,',:N ia. .n irt:..,..r.•.a Y`.w.,.7:.,a.. ... .... .... ^'tY-�o-."a`i:.��{r5 + s a, r JILDING , hEIGHTS ON' 1- hL 0 HAT 146.fj GHT ,DO YOU WANT* 3t 61 OR I Z S T R I E S 3LIC HHARI' t; ON TH rCtt STAk ELEMENT s _WHAT T!,5�LOUT. � some will ire ,,,coal for higher Intensity. One or more still. want 20,,staries,;i u are needed_to -ehow that, the bulSt of. citizens are for loll hei t lim�.ts. � end to euppaany other ,part of CoMil hiRent you're: intereisteed. in). Via Public h& rin *::(Planning Ct�mmissicn. City Council Pnd Cooetat Commiscioi e will doteraine: the -future of the Huntiit, tan Bes.jh Coastline. .'IIF -1AL 1U....'"""'liT�#�1�AT�t�� . Alterna vex'"1.` . `eta -story taa7Ci.mum TILE BMT F3h`T# .r— • AltecyrnatIvec 2. d' # es •�► 6"st4 .A . in ! and4: on. u�j► be�lox, f . lilterna fives i� ire. w� I2-etto X.. scum i ver 3-vtorles.6th .to Goldenwoot 3 . fy �! Gtad'�'aF *. LaRnttMa't�rtt4� '• 3 Le Q"er �3Qtt�i+w t c ock.# C141144i Name;" ,trot we ..✓ - f J W416" V 8C t et f f iid.1 d g L�ti��a e 1 Y�'C «•� pelt � ri,.w.K�°✓'Oj���► �+rA .L' /w+. r+ra. rr+ .. . - � 1 i. DATE AND p.. CE AiNG SE Where: City Council cha zbAras Civic Center vita, 2000 gain' Stnot, S.B. When: - Tueaday, Oct. ?, 19800 700 00 pa ; FOR MORE 111F01MAnop CA 1. Leonard Wvi ht (writer of this paper) 536-)577, 606 - 15th Street, Pears r' WhyAlternative I Low Intensity, is the bast altornativa. -18 pages. G m ie paper extracts Information from the doou n� toted below and unou :acts, analyais and opinion to show that hltornative I In best) . 2. City Manning Stmfr, 536-5279 (alike lulturi)I 536-5Z70 (J„ ihe-.-XM!%)or. 536-353T Q,ij�atalano,) fors . Coca tal Element, 167 pages.' con 1. Covern 9 coustai elements. prart jechnical Memorandum It ljurk round Ae art on theCoastal h1ament, 41 Exagoo, Pr available), (Discusses several items as aide n nhoohim one—of the 3 Land Use A l.terna t ivr.R) . ' �' VE AT iiE NLJt a It:'rr he t o e cottrteaus at all times troth with those holding the her►,rlsru, arpri wi ti�szsn hr;va c� c� e t vi.at�rs or• dlstributic» cif L`his p�apex•. .�� Figure 1. The flyor. wv distribv.ted, „ t�1 J:i:Y lV'i!,.,s .+{'f.» ._......._... ..w.,«.,.....,q-.«.rlJ.•.a.:..±,'.•.. .... .. . .2 t..:r...S.., ... ,,.,. ai.. s .. ..3; . .:L..,.:.i-:..._.,..A' ..I.a..:w:i6N"K'Fi^f:YR 0.M.+hl.'.NY+u.s.+.ew to -. 3 d r e f'r t;f r� sti�{fl 1 A w' w �lPFiiBJ' L. Wright to PC/CC. it1-►3-•60 Land Use selection To: PAC From: Leonard Wright 1-25-t Copies to CC, PC.' PD. PC 606 - 15th St, HB subJeots Items touching on redevelopment Time and fort expendo h7 PAC PAC mcnbors, attended.,many meetings and contributed much time over tiro •'�� pant yeaar.• $omo PAC members spent extra effort in composing the PAC newsletta,o, Th000 ('acts -aro known and probably "ill be r000gnixed,at • ; e akpropriata tine. f Any 4x40lC 1: oc m t I've. made (or that some othara• nako) In to uay infer. that.A9.��peopl 76t:'aby group are exnotly alike In their attltu4eaa. . �• . and asatlq ., , x,sail ttat, thooe inside and outside of PAC kno" this. With o66,'(euewl • a ;oBcp tign, all mambars of PAC have rassine�d adl�i'iinb and frioiKllk X:v 4t�.iaei�'. Thee my; i00er,.of:.rec1gn#tion was distributed (Dec. 15)9 or wife received.* ,phone; pa;,J f n6z.an elderly leAy who identified horzolf me a . PAC menber, then ohmaged' hor story to being the wife of a PAC arzabor .(I'm' �! certain that •ahelet x1at, the wifo of a PAC member) . The"cal,ltir tal& my wifo that Leonard Wright ie an idiot and that my ;• wjf6 was en ,idigti�.to,.atpy ."rrled .to hid. Subsequently my wife rooeived � daily Gallo frog the sane won an --- oowatimes vith more short oo nmantca, • . somatimes with;the dLA1 olloklM, sometimes with silence.:When it=0 sppeaarad in the paper that she didn't bike r . a whistles i4a .blown in sy 'rife'e, bar when ahe picked up the phone (aneaapapar'aiartiale that day oentisn+ed the poasibIlity of revitaliettlon � ' instead of radevelopment) . •y . a wihietle wns blown In my sori'o ear when he 'picked up the phono (in , rejaponue to an article on redevelopment in the Independent. If the caller is a► .m.embar of PAC, I'm eartAin that no othar PAC meaber s In any way oondonea this taotic. My wife aeconpaniewd mo to tho first part of the Jaya. 20 PAC matting to see if any voices matched that of tho f;;} caller. The results were Gas we expected. it' a:!. family io furthor harradaed, the er atrator may not like "hat results. ,. Candor bX th-a mom • I was pleasantly ourprioed by some of Mayor aieder's candid stcatem&nto f on redevelopment atoms. Alec .that one of tha membess or PAC stated that '1 1 ."P,Yor Wieder was beaaiea lly correct .� Tops 20 PAC ©aerin4). .,♦ ,�, � b 1. ,,, ..•:. .`y •.• . . 1 . r r•.I• y r'AM J• , ` I�,r s1/�ysl, •* •,,;,,,:_ • , �li�i es th4t Hasaz: iectear•aaint6 d, eaflth r 'tSd s r)a 't eiba'+ ednh�th 'l a jr till�tap fri tod'�t tf� 1 i. resolved thus far during her tai% as Mayor. i one or the reoponsibilitiea of city officials Its to consider varying � concerns, then to make dectelons bused on s rcaoonable interpretation of r, the facts. If YAC deairee to make sumary comments, I believe that the suggestion of one. of its membera is appropriates a letter that describer positive � activities by PAC. • ? Figure: x. Th® day thin lettmr wag diatr uta btu . wy wife! reausi�ewd 3 shone cslZe Erma tdaio r�oaan. lees sad ttw involvti�thew polioey to put nn end to thi+� harx�aaeermm�t. e r. { L. WrightL to PC/CC. x1-3-80. - - Land usa selection. Who InflaN oor+vse regevelon s2nnt_. take-actions that a]Ee dotj:jwej3tal ta,nearby Y'ros the previous neation "PAC has played its role badly." it's obvious what a danger PAC can be. PAC will bo with us at lesmst 3 years after the: plan is adopted. Aloe. ;s ao=enrs at the 11-11-76 VAC./Rc: tasating are ` a•ram.aon or ooncorn t ' Keiop eminent dow.La in the Tornlot area, We'll want; to use it up to 011vo. . go .shculd,hAve no height limits in the downtown oomeroaal area boasusee the higher you goy tho more finonololly feael,ble it lei (nUother RC uovbar rightfully challenged this). voted to give no oe a tex- Inoresent-financing funda to law and moderate income haueing. Conaear Ing the et:rip along PCO eoroas the T01412011. IPW "Te4 s ' • 35-foot': halght 1tosit until a high-clue ordir noe Is adepta;d, The'�'r HC approved. ' Vntee had over 3 rears of herd work to get aoM orditmnoac in . than Townlot. And we,t a had understandings that Tbar6 would bpi no high r1eas hero. We don't appreoiato a now geati a ment body , t hraMening to daat:ray a lot of our work. * Hots.,,nny Uzon mutt we go thru this? ' These attitudes point up obvices dangers of redevelopment. . It thip 1 In being pr�t;ed�now, how much worse might we er.peut; over the jg 1 year life of .ttta plan? Raneons like these are why nany people , distrust t:hst couch govarnment power ovor that long a period, . `. Figures 3. Title is excerpted from pages 3 and 4 of my 12-Y6-76 Xettor of reoignation from i-AC.' In this ?ettor I told why my position switched to that of opposing redevelopment. (Also coo Fig. 4 on P. 6) . i 1 • •:1,`„.... ..rrf' ♦'iN s'-, :.[i., ci:.r'. a.... .. ... i '.1. L.. ._s; ...a 1. .:!! ,. ,. ,,. .,.•i.., ... ... .. .. ......w.....� .. 1 t. 1 J • L. .Wright to FC/CC. &-3-80. -b- Land L-d selection xcep quiet. Don#t eoeak up. • Over the last 6y' eara I've sacrlfieed a lot of family life and other activities, a-nd don't feel like unnecessarUy repeating the process. I feel that we have all the ,publin input we need to come up with a plan that minimiaao oitIzen concerns. ' 0n Marra, 197?, eomeono told me that his attorney had all of my lettered ; That my letters wore inflamstory and that if I wrote about him in the some way agatju,.hie attorney►.,would pursue the matter. !ty MIN size to 'thiai lei . xf 7" WOM 'D owme to ray satisfaerion whore I've made an incorrect start bnt; I!il..reradily retract: it, t I trcn*t be intimidated into keeping quiet just: because Qoneano doesn't • . like -fit I have to. spay. . . • . ., If someone promotes something thAt.definitely is against the beat ;. lntereate or well-being of Townlot residence, 1011 apsak up tand/or { wrIt in. opposition Co it. ' My ,.•ors .antn are reasonably wall-infoxraed. I've Lallsarl with moat of the I reaidont-ounere in the Toenslot,aroac over the yearn. If I oppose something,, Y you'll also have substantial public opposition. You also could have i opposition on items that I don't speak against. I have a long history of working positively with the city, ,area rasidente . , and davolopers to noZve area problems, I'31 try to be fair and objeativo, But I don't;. mUnt' to ►iesto a lot of time like we did in 1976., With all the public lnput,ydu have. I hopefully won't have to upend nuoh time on tht8 or writa many letters. Figure 4, ThIs is excerpted from - 77 letter end concerns p, � of iry 5 24» �,. u: response I got to my oommento in Fig. 3, p,5. s}' t rr. 4 t �,;.�'"tY1a.tthJ,•:ft7J.:..:ti.:.•w"+s.+r,......•.................»..r«.,r..«.«..........«.. .....,v... ...... . „.....c. .«., ' .s4... .:.H A4.'.tis'-" .s ln.3;..i•'1trr.s....11,:.. ♦f.+.wi^•nn y;�v..y r S r.. r •t OAF /--- MOtA DEVELoPMENI C0MX)PA1K)N1M8 ADAMS AVE.IIUNIII'GION UACR CALF 92643/(7{4)536-2541 6994ELCAW,00REA:WIE 21`LCAftWD.CA920081QU)4384W October 23, 1980 BEACH . .. plANtANG DEPT. Huntington Beach Planning Commission OCT 2 3 1980 Attn: Ms. June W. Catalano !90 Senior Planner _, , p. 4. Box •r•. C{{:�l of Huntington Beach .•`'• ''"Huntington ,CA9a P.O. Sox 190 ffuntingten Beach, CA 92648 Res Local Coastal Plan • Dear Ms. Catalano: After hearing testimony offered by other property owners at the Planning Commission )fearing on October 21'Ut regarding the downtown alternatives proposed for the Huntington Snach Coastal Element, it neems of greatest importance is getting development started in this area. We are . in A position to develope a consolidated block of land located between lath and 13th streets on Pacific Coast Highway. - Re ardin_ thins site,' we reseectfully request that the follfl n-'reco=endatfona_ ; be considered: ; 0 Re-designate, the above described property from Visitor Serving to Residential in troth Alternative, O1 and Alternative 12. ,�,• - ,.. (Alternative #3 already designator it, A ' ,r+;��••y�1,M•M. • �Y•~y Ronidential) M • �f• •:.• i •��1I�.. .•.+• �`��.,�r.[/,M.•��•f•�, `y �i ` 0 Request the Visitor-Serving CategaLy to redefined to permit Residential use above -the ground floor. rf there is truely demand for hotel/motel establishments in the coastal zone then thosa could be built in reaponse to this demand, rather than Coastal Commission mandate. If large portions of the coastal area, especially the larger consolidated pieces such as ours, are zoned for a product type which hall no demand, then the coastal zone will remain in its present atate-undeveloped or underdeveloped. ,.*m"14c o.,MM sun `.sn•+•+,€ -. .:��..iyAsu'w•...mow ...___... _...__ __ ...�...._ _ ....... .. ... .,. .. <, .. .. .,.....,«.,,,;..... � ,. ,.._......_........_..........t... ... _.. r r . 3 ttuntington Beach Planning Commission Ms. June W. Catalano October 23, 1960 Page two _ 0 We request that provisions be,provided in Altersizttive fl for height limits exceeding the present three-story standard. Hopefully* members of the Planning Commission and City Council will be able to rise above the immediate inf:;uence of local residents to examine the broader. range of alternatives ., for community development-especially those that might extend the opportunity for others to live somewhat affordably_ in a, coastal area.. We recommend a six-stony height �. •� � : liiait consistent with Alternative #2. '��wei�w hasten to add that .wo -are not suggesting the. 'bntire coastline ba developed in ^this fashion# but rather consideration be given to individual applications wi h merit% `r June, you and staff are to be highly complimented for your efforts on the LCP to date. We aincey:ely hope that the Planning Commission and City Council approach this subject h. the name insight and willingness to explore new ideas in a reali is framework. Sin .r 1342. vop lien, vice-President . General Counnex ; ' f•��'�Y+'i •1'` �.t: PEvE/lk , .�•t♦ ♦,.,j, .,t t ' •• ,•, •., •• •' +•, : a•. '� •"1• �', • . +J 71� . �• r T 4 . • �...�,�' �.'1C .'44- �w1l1�!• •.� 1 �.t .M `' �yS�}�'s�tK Z• 'trK ..'/ . .i 4 . - i .. 'Y...,r�! 1.•.ir +,.!„j'.�i�, aj�w !•1?•'i+�rta{�'` t, , I r � f i��,a�.�i«:�.�.•.,.••..",.it":N.'•.:4.raT.ats e.m.w•... ...•....ww..e...,. r.+w..... .,»...•....,..._.._........................•.-.�.. .w•., ........,..........,.._.--...........,..._.., .... „-.,,.. .. _ .; } STATE OF CAUFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGTNCY EDrdUND G. BROWN JR., Gaverat.• DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION 325.0 Southern Region Headquarters ' 2505 Congress Street San Diego, California 92110 (714) 237-7411 „�ji: •'..':�,) ��' ���'1 October 22, 19e0 Ot.Y 23 IJEtt� f P. 0. Box 190 Huntingto;, chr V,92640 Mr. Jo=cs Wo PaUn, Director Department of Development Services City of Huntington Beach Y.O. Box 190 Huntington Beech, California 92648 E ' Dear Hr, Wins . I Thank you for the opportunity to review the draft Local Coastal Progran, Coastal Ele ant Polie:•Last for the Cf.ty of Huntington Bsasch, Our cencerns are as fouuvss Policy Segment 10.5 Page 150, Item 01, (l.b) The Department of Parks and Recreation, as a matter of courtesy and policy, subraite,plana to City's and affected public agencies for their I_ revilow and recomendationa. This proposed policy vests solely with the City the authority to allow or disallow State' landscaping plans, disregarding the park'o state-fide source of funding and mission an established by the legislature. p4ge 151, Item ix, (2h) This paragraph is not clear in Ito possible affect on the State. It cruet be made clear, that the Department of Parks and Recreation continues to be opposeW to the development of any channel crowing 8tato Park property. Page 152, Item 03 item (3a) - Boa coa%eut regarding Page 150 Item (3b) - See co=tnt regarding Page 150 Bias Parkins Ar eass Wes concur with the need to improve beach accenai- bility through then use of buses. However, we are opposed to the use of this park for transit ayst4= storage. I • y4lyti�'�'�1. v�• .ev•.. ..,.,. ..,.�. •t...+<'a..i:i�",..r. _ts..lie.....w.sx.o....—..,......�.-......—....�......�«. Alk Mr. James W. Palin I. Page 2 y October 22, 1980 ' � 1 Access to Early Userat Early park accese is currently available f through approved parking on Pacific Coast Highway. I Incensed Public Access Opppartunities: We are opposed to increasing s' public access to the parka through the fence unless there are corres- ponding atop lights and crosswalks provided for public safety. . ' Page 153,, Itcas 04, (4d) j Ehn are the "affected private parties" requiring beach access in the Eleventh Street area? j Page 154, Items 05, (5b) We were pleased to note that the City wishes to encourage the use of the park for camying during the winter months. Page 154, Itaua f6, (6b) Cal Traris proposes to widen Pacific Coast Highway from its present 4 lanes to 6 lases between Golden West and tht Santa Ana River. Should Pacific Coast Highway be widened to 6 lanes, there would be no safe parking avail- able for the users of Bluffs Reach Area. Page 1580 Items 0100 (100) t We are is agreement with the Cityro•wish to promote the rccstabliohment of tidal flushing in wetlands. However, no specific nothods were discuated. We are opposed to any charnels croasiag the park. Sao Page 1519 Item 020 (2h) for specifier. r:• tw Page 1.58, Items f10, (10b) The activity of developing and maintaining a landscape buffer around the edoo of a wetland could potentially pone a greater threat to the wetland than leaving them to their own devices. Page 1580 Item9 110, (10d) Same eo,=eut as Page 151, Iten 02, (2h) �z Page 160, Itema 011, (11h) Thin policy appears to more than adequately cover the needs of the oil interests, but fails to address the needs of our public. Rather than require the developer (State) to prove that the site is not important a. .` -4V n r �t4'i'sresw.r.•.*-...r.......,+».• .. ... _...�..�-.............,.�.,.,......a . ..,....r...w.v+•.a.....,.....................+....v+,.......... ...........-.-..-..r..-..».....J, t Jw r . 4 Mr. James W. Palen Pago 3 October 22, 1980 t { for oil exploration, the oil company should be required to prove that: their needs are in the national interest and that there is no other way. Page 160, Items 112, (12a) we support tile need for rasearch and development of new energy technological However, va aro. oppoaed to the utilisation. of Stato park Syot" propertiea for these activities. Page 160, Items 012, (12d) What is the intent and affect of this see-ion on the Department of Parses and Recreation? Page 162, Items 013, (13c) : . This item appears to be in conflict with Iten 111i (Page 160). + Page 162, .lta w 113, (13d) Auple easaAants now exist crossing State Park prope,?ty. Future pipe lines from offshore facilities and outfall lines silt be required to use one of the cumy aziuting cmae manta. Page 1639 Item #14 i We do not understand why oil and other anargy-ro:se ed buaineacau are not required to "also" obtain City approval for th air plans? t•1 Page 166, Section 10.5.9, "Administration" t. The phrase, s'providing .for these regional needs, etc.", should be changed to atatevide or national needs. (Local Coastal Progr4o Regulations 00041.). Pages 167, It&= 017 We assume that thin eo=1ttae will be advisory to the City only, as the City reatalued the authority to accept or• roject all but energy related dave lopneat proposals. In aumaaary, we feel that' the policies proposed are basically sound with the ex- caption of the specific items noted. "s I:k'3tri v'•a-w:+vr•.•.+w••v•u••r.a.r.r.r... .t `t Mr. James W. Palin Page 4 October 22, 1980 We are, however, deeply concerned with the controlling tons of the individual policy ststements and their attempt to direct, for local purposes, a ningle identity, the California Depart=nt of Parks and Racreation. We are also con- cerned by whet appears to be differeatie,l treatmat afforded the ens rgy producing agencies •aver the recreational producing agency. Sincerely, It b L. Ieinze, Tj oral Director Southern Region j , ov .4, in, Environmen ts!Hhoard '%' CI rY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH on-sit .1molm" Post Office Box 190 • Himtington Beach, Citlilafnia 92640 October 20, 1980 Honorable Coitunissioners z SUBJECT: DRAFT COASTAL ELEMENT, LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Commissioners; The Huntington . Beich Environmental Board has reviewed the Draft Coastal Element and finds it to be the product of an excellent effort on .the part of the Department of Development Services staff and the: LCP Ci•tizert Advisory Committee. Supplemented by the policy additicrts recommended by the Advisory Committee at its September 11, 1980 meeting, the Board feels the Element presents a good balances of local planning need; with the requirements of the Coastal Act. , The Environmental Board finds particular merit in the recommendations made by tho Advisory Committee concerning the Hols3a Chica, Because this area is In the (.::sty's sphere of :Influence, and because the County's planning effort ba6 'bntil now been lacking in direction, the Board believes that s a rtrcng statement should be made by the City recognizing the ecological values of the Bolna Chica and the importance of its preservation. Anathcsr area of much concerts to the Board is Downtown. Given the liml - tation, in public services and the sentiments of the area's residents, the Board feels Alternative Three, the high density alternative, should not be selected. Whichever alternatives is chosen, however, it is important to recognize that each wary carefully ronstructad to meet the requirements of the Cous;tal. Act as well an the need for long-overdue planning for the area } Because of. this, the Hoard strongly recommends adoption of one of 'the three with a minimum of alteration or lessening of specificity. We would in fact: like Lo suggest more specificity in. one area: protection of the old rail right-of-way as a potential, transportation corridor. The Environmental Board believes that the Local Coastal Program represents . a -unique opportunity for tluntingtvn Beach to resolve long-standing planning Issues and to dramatically improve the quality of its coastal area, The Board$ thorefore, respectfully urges your support for the adoption of a strong Coastal Element an presented by the City's planning staff and the Citizen Advisory Committee. Respectfully, czol)-it Irwin Haydock, hairman Environmental. Board A-'�'' ';�'G':i*ie -;rx F'=r.s w .« .nw,...+a,...,-...,,.,r,..-,. ,..._....... ... .........�....,.., .. ..•.+.�,..... ,... . ,. ,r ..r, ..<..•.•..,.w ._.mow................... ... � y HUN71NGTON BEACH CHAMBER o1 t;OMMER NE ALtFoRNlAaz6Aa HUNTINOION sa 16562 eERCH DOULEVARM SUITE�26 EACH. 1714)462.6501 HUNTINGTON BEACH October 20, 190 "" E%ECtItIVE en►,MITTEE- IUQ U t♦t ,, ' '�4(1 JrTVcr lt(}tlIUGS P's1t6Pn1 V..t •• � 4uu Wrilrrn Mulus,EV-10rt RESOLUTI ON # 1980-7 190 WILLIAM COLtIPTO►1- III Vice Pro$. 5n rAln rn,snn Co Huntingto- ::tl,CA 928r11? IEntIMF�A GAME •7►d VICe!'+'►A All ffln" JACK tttlOtEY ' T'e"u'e' RESOLVED: that the Directors of the Huntington CMI+K1,nn AgrxntY nl HIS nA1 P►+r �tsEn E.Aca+i�r r+a� 5UPPOr t t Ile Beach Chamber at Commerce .'TAN nntEtt4o do hereby CAVItens,toolet�hct^s at1,�N stated posl t i on of the I�ownt own Development Commi t t e+e, �r,f{qll pestil alternative ( 3) t nnnEnl 1EpAY strongly f+:vor i ng three of the L•C• • f eq.rV Bunk r11PErinPs 19W plan; with the f of l Owl n9 conditions: r;11API ES REk41NT V OFF III All."fW-1 CPA al References to heights are to be deleted. E)ANlri T)EAN JnnAltun♦SluAtn >�2 The definition of ,visitor Services" on page rvcnrTT, t)t1T1<'iE ►ttrnt,nninn Fr�tuh•e PA/Y rntornunuPS 121 of the Local Coastal Plan be broadened to perm![ CAPttt.rN EW+►It3 COn1�tlef cl al and r est dent i al as secondary uses• g lls FV ,l rt wAnrNs of f I ces, jArrr rrr►tAN rr r•Al.i (%A%rn . ��ttzniA ct+tslUu, • WhTto^ATI,,, Pt.u,IPA, ***passed and adopted this 20th day of October 1980• jAr.%n writ" timilm C.M., t1Ank • r 51FVF t4001`N �� e* ` Sol $hn..a lelWlncR I.nl✓ 111►IT1f311+5T F Cry su71 nsnnQ� �C Board of Di r�� ors Live ,4!1 agar u•71 !t,t�l n+A11V Q1 f t 1 Wit 0461 rt ii nS0+1 —' pent nl ArMIrA jrnnV r:1+FA 1411M.P1 --n n•Ar.n rnffiii Sri Nrr n:,►+f t TA711 Ama,rt.t tirtA n IIAt i i�111H 1 C. rr-APV utr►+Ani►tn�a A 1 a n.rhAte t Try+A 4Y;c• 1 � rHin VVAt1En PAr,ld C;tlt BA^Y VAptlfI1 V/AA0 Mt"� All ShMi A•AI E08111. or $TAN Vt:llNTT , Huwltnglnnll�Atht.<►+^Plnt .. ..,., .. ��� � ... .. .�..r.H.r.nrr--...w.w+e^I'. rwr•'w.w-...•-... •il....L. l.V.+..r1v•.J'.'t,1-:....- ..... ._...-...........�... �,�'-t U 4 IL J i' A� 1 •s a t .1 � , � 1 � d t t ,t t ' � � 1 t• t , J ��4�}E�'�' �+'i �,°��`r.�,, •.��ki ��I� 4� '�� v '�.,p����4���} 1 �+c T~�� N1@ �• , "�� �IM; ' 1.' ^'`� .1 .{ �'• t}i����}a/�y�t t°���� ,�"'.•�;� {��r alt;�t t?� 'i ,1IF�rFy'���la�Y�yt t'4+'�x{� �i$ y s1. { .rklt / b.. i ]t . $� , ►iy° L ; A {4i 'y �$`y� l,�t ( �i` i '� ` � '� " k �� ..' � r c 1•,#11't�., r:y•. ,i 4` .?` {►,[,'+,. Y t'"i ' 1 lr.t y.,. 1. '�+' �tqtqc X,t .r ".♦f•� ,4...r !F ,. i ,}'�4 :, 1�. a'��+ {f•,�' 171 � •Y+,c"'a•i" } rK�1:tY�, t t„ �.�. t a ,T,1 L, y-t '1 t''i 'Y' . t r T..?. A'1."�3.L7•�` + , )k` ,G �.tt4 k. •w, f 1,�yt .� �a, �." 11'3.� :�` 11, '.Lt{ � t 'i � .;; ; 4 !; T, .C♦,t�} k 'tr'ti+ l L' 1\1£W� 4:x K IP E t fi `? i + '�'"1r •r�L E, R r� `: X '* jIt S� 1 Ri� `!} ♦I + r'`'� t Y tt �i. t ! t'�,5 �.' ti j a�' .,q('•�..1 '4� ,•?r} ," x'Y ,1 "�.� �'thr �'i `',iFl` '' 1'�`•t•�y. ; A ,s , , T, , rfati• cc, lwD- ,z� +:�t •��".='f' !'1t�4� ,�n, �t � •N]•Yt''�/ n" t 1 ap.rs!� ��,�� {}y��..� rfi:CY+{�T� ��� .�l Ul� �.[j}��"j �1,'. J�� Ij•�r!' t .� zi' a^,�. � LAI. tl?i� �t'S11�.1•�1':t[�, .__i rt�:t#t:�t.'.�`t:h���.�a.���.1�<'1.��\ �i3�t_•�+,11,��;7i'�t{Fi?t�Y�"w�����.� �\ 41 i• 1 1 AVE K Nt#,*ToN BEAC K C-NO 926461(14)53,}25" MaA pEV LV4AM C0iV 6W AMMO Fes.SWE 21.CAR SM-CA 9?o061(n4)a36^IW October 13t 1980 ton Beach + ` City of Hunting .' Planning Coamission• a: P.O. Box 1g$ H ngton each, 0A ::Q2696 unti Re; Local Coaitial Phan 4 ' Dear Planning Goan issian Members: i to provide our reaction to•ubtablthe yen$ach The purpose of this lettar s Undo bushed Ctty of'.Muntingtan Beach Coastal el of wri He feel published `. cd t�ith"large quantities of written and verbal of you ai 1 •.a ae1 uugg thus .our., comments will be brief* opinions an this subject+ doctrent due to its n thatancethe future im- t and heneed to respond to this erations to come• There i stchedl inathe�UP,that + y ageen on Beach will be of Hunting, . . . ., a Otero+ coastalplan will be toevelopedte 1��•� hopefully, A ms jp�•'resuit of the ed or underdeThe veloped image, development of he dar+nttorin rep esentsaa blur on teeaCnar exciting character of this part of. ortunity to crew s but also represents an excellent opp image. What ot her coastal communities in eadYhfa new ideas? hIt is mLjor, portion of heir,coasBsach hastline athe potential to evolve into one belief that H Able residential cc ues ies in eciall South- Mr pities, especi Y of the most "balanced and other coastal cam�u ern California. Certainly erclass enclaves unappreac able in Germs Orange County. have became upP a majority of the population. made a place to both work live by. has already _ aradble housing. We Peal that our Pier P i F 1 of a�ff area with our Pier Poinfie cohorts in other rVa3or contribution in this }• j act an Main Street and hope to continue with chase's projects. 1 ent Corporation is tite ultimate ; A particular concern to Mala Develops i hwa We have ronsal- disposition of a black of land located betwHen 12�h And 13fh streets f.1 in9 eat ur oses. This site is located in re t on the inland side;of Pacific Coas lax and problemtic area idated this block for development a particulary cep ed wnership which what the Cit,Y wits t disperse small parcels and hig��1Y cfiaracterixed by ects"• a teas inhibited large scale pra j NONE kk t. • 1� ! h � '� a `� i• n ,, i ! ; 1. t F i t ' � 1 t i` . t • tl • "i. T1,'?}y..'7'TtrS'i�,4'+'.;.Y. '•' ! ;:7 rtt�:� �+)„?S��i;�,i�1�Y��,�•S�PL. �i'�;�4;�• t.'•1{.'r`5 ��,d�(�t�� 7y�)�1�11 s ..1 w"�'�t w yytt7�,Y,x,1)r' t�;E,ti, i y•"�'� 4 '(� t� �� t'�t���;a��` �d' 1%�KY y,n' # �$'�,� A,Rt�; 3T..,a�,,a, .f l ;tti...._,�t`. ..y ��: ! av�yi 1� atttl4 .5,.� i, ,..srs b.,2, R�'�i�1���1 �°+�'.� ,�.ic '-. 1tht�r,R^� 2� �C.4 � •�j�f�t�� #3 °�ti �`�'a ��,r�.i��T+�.i �: •a� w � Ili r t t, +�.i�t :44•;•+ ,tr3. .1 . � �93:.� i �� @ - 3y �4�,�,� ,� ti7 �} +n� r.� , 'i{.:aa ,� ��a't♦ ��t+�: ' 4r���:xG.y. V1. w� ,X�� 4 p2a i�� Csat ��t"'llir..xi �.x+ L�1+��.�. �� kyt Y, •� lV.�' �.��.ti' � � � ,tp"•� ti'�i `R. �,n y.t j '•�t.. h t , S�;i:, F +, C; � ;f Y;P�4��e tq� �;,{' r� }'� q e)�� �1,•���:� �r?+� •... 1 f{ g! ,�w�•e. �i'u� � 't :'C � 1�, T• x.4y.�f'` Ali,�.V�.p� � r+lt�i� {t,�I � {.-:;� '.f '�`,•� �� sz; -��'�.a. fi �,+��`'��' �,k�.r .����q�). ., �s,;Lr�; ��!�� �,y � ��P .Ik-..��' .5;:� �'¢�, .�7�. '� i. ..1 .� 1 �.,R> S. 1xa4 ` k•n i y .:1 ra5 :.�.'r' , =y. ;y . �tlifa S g i 1 + �5 ,� i;t , . ,,� � •ax:,,Y,1' i t t "l.1 9 ,:i. ..t A ,.0 n� ,r.t ..,•�! �1� t '. �•; �l i ��� "ti . t � t1��� . ds d�. � C '� �y���F�RSI C� .�1,��ti, ��5•x��.��t M�t.{,���'.'i�� )��7�i� �`�.����,�r,gyp '�Y.ax l��i"',�"'}f a..�� �'��4�+�t,,� ��k j 4;R:i3��p�•�_t��'; �,.tK, �at�,��{i � ';�[ t:s;�, ..1,-�.� ?'4����,��, {�t�l �f'j}rs�;',y �,��.�,��4 "���I4 �•u.'�e'�:+���; ����'::`."•,i+•:, �t"t4S1'w'�.t+fll.i��l ..[l§t. .r,�, Vv.a��%rt+, ti'{. .�::���a.1 ! ,,a�4tiY�'{7,� .�affiR.. Planning Cormission members i October 13, 1980 Page 2 been T.hI. a alternatives for deielopment Of the td�dowree ntown rerea offered for:.rsview, by staff.,., ,.g-. of our':prop8rty,as ,Yixitor•Ssrving� ,The third alternative would permit hig{1�' ity residestVA1 gse:L: Nith; �e�lementoindicatesypotential uses r.AtagorY$. th$ Coasts yixit¢i ; in9CcQdati - including hotels, s;►':(god and servicos - rlocl ;4., . t. r► . not�at ,c. urida,•.ne3Lai�rantS;. and cansorcial-recreation develop. 1''E1 :fort r Indicates that there are five hotel/ tR twn�area (totaling 239 rooms) Which t motel '8 a ,dam the suamer season and about '.f typ ��t pl fit, „ He assure the intent th 0, 4 R. •` �% 'Coastal Zone Visitor-Serving, s to -,, in d $�� 'rthe; n requirement mandated by: State :,.. ` ' l nse¢s-reasonable requirement as Hunting— .-,every. 5�'�'. .,. i$sis.,a"very. real r (ire Los Coastmi� � "'` thousands of visitors from malty areas of ton Bac '! . . . ' t a: Ang@lies � '*�-t,�y,�.,s• ,, , ,`.s '� '. �c ri,= h 'o• the issue'of,.Visitor-Serving' we contacted ; In preSixiinary,:�r8searc„R. n +►o 0106' fiYpNtilf�tels currently :doing business in the Crjlden• .west Suet/8eacll',8ouleba�• i quadrant. These two were the 5un'N Sands t 1 I7 Units).•ind the Runtington Beach Inn (lAA Units). felara are Moe thQ results of- this tontact , . , . •` r• �,, sun`N; - nds`kote f J0e, l 4 iluitn threethe weeksst lnoAugust, €` a o ., u 1 a thQ f ;rs a week- this HoteV*eported lOt1 occupancy on ends provided there was good.weather. On nine .typical weekdays during "the season":.occupancy runs from• a0S to 100'�. ..Ouringi`ca1 jyrrunsfrom months 6f. the-dear. occupancy typ 55 751;;i�n .tha•rrreke= a tO the %vlsitar profile" week'.i ' when quests{�ned r�s the response was as follow: .30 International` Visitors 55% Out of State Visitors 109E L.A. Basin Visitors 8uslness ME Cl early. the shove small hotel does not presently have a sizable number of regional visitors. ; Nunt_in tton Beach Inn • This is by thetar the CoastaliZonext a"Wd rriost r,ra ess ono ;Hotel in It wins indicated that over the past summer their best, month was August with an average of 70% occuppaancy on the weekends. I am sure you are pamf}ier.aith th ndhthatry of it hashnotubeengtotallych Inn avid understa i i , a 1 f. t t r a t � ` , � i t r + s � 4 •, iy 4 � t .d 4 ' • , , Wi tbi' ��� l�.ltC✓{ It ♦' !rg,1 �1 g3�Tl�4 ,tL rr.��khL•Y"'� y � �y�+�R.�,p}� �f '+��a.r} ��.:•.t 4��f#� *�nL .4{� ..���� :.,g. ':c`t•i!i .1, aye �.R $ t t fi 1, ` 4"! i r}.: >> �i�. I+ i }� @, X�j ,, � � .,� ,� t ,}fit i,�t,+'' a �iy ti.�•��i'Ert;F i'�� '�i � .\, � �` �y;�'��[t �l�� t���;4v1��i�.,}�,�l���i��tF�y�hF y.• +,�� 1si4��-. .�• C Y - 'a N.�Y 5�5, .,t S1 rr 4' +. "e' #, t f q « p"• .�' {fit � s ft a '� 1. V:p i T"1*� ('3,•a t .;,.� .i�s fi t tV t ! I i, � " �, ;.,5 .x'sa ti z}7,Sfy �_ R, tw v ,' . t x kRx i fit! S4. i :e":1 • 0a-y.7 ,�, y'}, " j T l.i�glFr.'"•k � $' "''� ,�,�tu ,;..^,cx` 4 1:..,11 �'�F� ��' ,} y t `'L •�� �� ':)'*, t, ' k�4�� , . "i.'�}.wh�'dk+il�Cti':t-?'�; }�t ,� y '•�,:,+j1.1��,.- .c '1 'T �"', 1. '" �- 7 r\. 'l a- ,�, '4 tA� I.r'�t � �y }.�• , �$' � S�� ,r. �� ...�� � �4{.•�M�;�� i ���;��� ( � �i:� ,�.j;a,q"�•�, � � D# y a�. '`•'i� �1w 1.'�'i,, Y , t .��YS, i '3u�.o.�y �-i . . rY.. LF`.� � �3�itt ��f i4 %�l a'i. r} � �4\ IYlYR .5 1 �` 4� .�+�, �+ �� + };'i p�1 ;lk.� �}, R f'• a( A NA � ri• '\ St i ,;s fit:l ,�• " vet 'fu c t .R ,l y}. x'�' 'f t y,4 ::� �} lri+t: A( 'a a 1 -S' y { i 'y:' L. }("} �t �t� . !�,, G. k �� ,:.�tt �'R't i,.a'�+ ;�.• y, f. ��� i7f> t i• ���}44�',y' '��:•;1,��J.; � , i aV:� ."t., ' S1" n�, \ � i i y'�•. . 'T X ' L��, 'i .Y4 . , !-� l,t'�'l Y" 1�,�'.� �t�� � � '{�+�..���'.'i �` t''�7�`.;h.��, ► ° 's' �,r ,� ,� 4t�,, �. 4� ' , „ ��`:fit,' i Fy\�+4 ��• �����b ��� i, ,f+` '���- '�R S f'�,�'K Jrl� icy+w�,,1{ `�R i�' S f 'i_.�,RtT S�'��t�Y �. 1 '�Ri� a.��S�v"•":�� t-3' ."l��V���+���t�::atlatlsR?������'.t,�t•.,��'��?" �tat,'4�1��,t'J�t'?`Aa' \'��,' � is .t' T. 1 i rI 16 �fJUMM ,r ,., r,- • OF OFA •ti,��Z44�i�F''Aa yi •�jh � f yf l d. r ei : r y 050 j � ��� }!,, fi„k+� f T {����f , ," � -�'+EI '�� i �; � r� r 4t�r � FS�►r`� �t,, Y ,��� .t{ �1�1. k �j�� t ,t t�,•� j�'�' L�'� .td�+ T�f �14Fsn l f1t 'Y} � fiia '.1 4 y # 4j «;y t1,,'�� .• rt '� 11 � �• mar�r � .i , 1 t w fir{' � N« •t�,� 1�. �'� ; ,4�� � 1 ( y f'. � ,t � e1 r. t' t1 � 1 A { !, r7 f I�t, ..t FL 1 i..T' III, �� � •'1� 4 • i a) "l , .l i Ull7 l L �fii1 �t. 11 S 7A .I:i, r `1. rir!!v < ri7F txi.'�:"t '✓ 4� ? .fi'ni th-' :+;yrG'!f«'! • I , r 4 1 " I Planning Commission members October 13, 1980 Page 3 Successful :ovor;:thp years. During the months ran; oil Jul y erid au ust�.the Nuntington.0each Inn do cud .ih:t 10,Shn" 8arhardino Sun on five sC cansecutivs Waekeri ,•'some o e attest days L:;of the Year.;;try tan'�ikt+�pt to stimulate bust �M'ra_Uit of this effort was _ t �r!�firpr ; 'indicating very minimal >` t ,',I,�,1,1 i�•,.Y{ /t`'.��. , R4•�.Arobhms t�'pursuipg a 'hoteilmotel. rest "d 0 llria'-is when you'add the' •' pro. >� titan# s nd other r cost. wi { I"1 ,. �tkmcks'a e4 ire is land, �� � u n along ypul �. atlly: three.;manthS of. Maximum encoura ructure.that crakes any scale use;., }'.� "'r• designs {' y ,A t,.be.liven.to:usage of the Visitor S evin w';f ilk c {T �;+• .,�s do town alternative `d 9 ; { selected. •i .. ' f r� It is. PO4&ps '' I1s�s 7 c don :of anc ag hybrid. ltsrt Yttj rill- be the:awst difficul'ttrnatiVes, or a "*""' me Citize�tAdvsoryi:ia*icy after two ears decision .-to make. sub,�act. .c utd; y , of deliberation on-this t �Y.`,oirfi'@� a:v$ry weak, endorsement.of'aiternative The missf in iant"in'the st and' the;ke to��ther,`future Q� the r: o�rn own rag , ` an as e�1611 e�es s en a . ew%- Ire3 ecttoh or. ens en nr 0 ; ,. -coos ?provan o us;a roc- a bast of other. pasitiye Yarr1ablbs'be ore thresidench�tistry�is�ri .}� build, with she.root` f�mtpQrte`tit4of rthnso v g wires housing stock.:; It is our beiisf,"thA't the onlbie a`doll:end:diwersifled in 'the`downtown=area es ec a -�►a l torstimuiate" "i�oi�ith o+r M ants v a nature {c rcumstancos� w au or sus s anc ra a r act do m e ras sn a sec w:> a� crease n ous n w c a recr ea o 51c v 5 mu a e cancer. U5@S aS C S aU n Ut n S mu a @ eman ;'.,: 'J s or .,ary ng` `; ,. , ar such In reaction 'to the theca alternatives posed for the downtown favor the third ` �► PO m9tting us the opportunity to pursue residentialw as Opposed to Visitor-Serying development. We could readily accept any of the alternatives if more latitude for potential land uses w ;. .!•`r:; available. The approach to the Tarn Cot area in the past has bee��o � { through a "specific plan" designation, and retention of this approach 5E'91I3 reasonable, An issue that is both ve► seas y sensitive and very pivotal to the development re the downtamm area is height limitations. retention of the three storyheight limit. Alternative API indicates ,f:y six stories and Alternative #3 twelve stories. Moreithanve �anething el it is probably'fear•a!' heights .that.ai i T .`' Alternative p�, .'-We sinc�*rel ha a that consideration acceptance gfeTse, edin 'the`-txsr�m e 1 be fiven•to rf# oat e t m t a on w t a ua� eas n MU a oca ens. j ' s rn oes no ma a sense o can nue -35 F WIN i ( a • 1 1 t (f { 4� {F' ,,�, 'i ; j. • � 1 r i �1 fly � y } f i r . r;► iF n.. • �. ,,;. � T�► GN pfklf •{ .i{} � �. ' �rti• n 'f► t`y .r},2:.FjaNj1 }k }, �" �5`. �tts4��, � p R,'ii ,'{"'2 ..♦r' ye" '"# F , :1 en 'Y Ei "4.t�q.'t t 1j ��.+ i ��',. { . A�.E�. h` a,1 �S,.ry l+f�t. 'i: •.�'t,,,�t '� :. ��i•��a: d Ali' .. ' `�!, ;'1�,� ra `t1. i ,� .s{ �i � .r � � � ,'�.'i �tq_.'�iw� �� s�iL}�t,.:}.. 1(.i�',x,N,'�' .;� � •�,+.tlt �t'`r {, t '�r t• { '�`�. d f �:. `�,T�, t 1 i�l1,. . yid ?p f .f' a J •A, �� !- ! t j1 1. 4 t ,c� ,} , .d ' {i p ! 7/p$'C LI- �." -09 '•7{Y ? �'hx.` y,i !• ,�.'.¢; •5• 1.1 i. ¢;h N.��+.r . '� I}"�,. '� f '� �r/ � fA � .`�•S' ,�� � f `$ r.'r .J°1 �f.wt 1 ��"S' ,� . ;p .�,,� �.'�.t� 1� ��,�}�,'���L( t �r "r�.F,+ � 1 v �. � aC"� �� � a �x,'1� .�t ,1a•;st "" �' •�� ,: �', Y�t;k'rx� � �'• n�� '��. +� :i .,, :�� �` it � �, 5 �� l�t.r'� �r C {� �r�'�. �,3 '� iY�; .�.r �t,� ^'-' F i}�'. .)• 'C: F't{r�� � IS �'�kt� }� '� • ��'� •� [ i i� �•y]��+' {k��}' ��, K q3.," ,c�iy? �f¢:3'r �, .��'yp�di, �� �R� f � .t• .'- : ';i�`. u"Y:♦ tti*.• ,}31iitt i'. �.y" t�'YC'.ci:A.,` � i 1 ��i3 _.� A�w, , 1 • 1 - • 1 r hh,err '•�,Y`t t;S' �ii Lair Til a l.A it t 1 �i to #cH� •i, R � ,� c �iaS'�Irq��}gz te ."�,��'•{ ''4`. •fit,f �9�*,�,�tt, 'r �•� �i �}'"ti�l r� • J� Sky ar �96 " 1}r � ♦ !�1 �i .� � i �1 � .. � , �. � ;'�t'j��l # k� � � �� C �� �', '�,' }t��1 `� t��l��' :� •� 'T 4�' 1 ,f�. ; }ha, a' �, t l� �1` "7 71 •�t� � i "' 't [ a.'[�f " jl r i '! � .� . j�+. �`�` ,�• �'eg4i�� f� �3� :2 `�,� ^ �`" {'•d1, ��� � �` .�+ . t��•��"+���<I..� ��1 � � �"�t��• ,�,t� �y#�� `3 � ���y,. t '�11x�1 3'�1 � [' _�� r� � ».� ,4 �' +. Il� , ' F! Sr 1'1 1,�.� , y� { � , � •} .►'�` 9��+I; 4 fj' • � k- .. � �r'�� ,.1'1 �; .,., �h � � � 41 '3' "{ s,{' �x�r4`• �` � , r �, . , qe fit.. � ,e , � 1 ,, ��� � f •F :� !�{ .t.��` ��`!• .� 1 t�A�" t.�. ��t 1., �� d�,x � i� `� i �i '�. �� � Y '�'1�,, �ik`'��5' l 1f� 1•r" t 1v� �� f� r �, � 1 � � '�1� �`jr ��_ �. •�� �r � ,�:"���� � � � ���k��r 1 �1�'� ' yj Y j�•r. y SCaj(i;� �. e��, ,1. �`y a+� l � A Iy Y � 1.'•T t ^I � } � �, 1 .fi �.. + �,t`7a '-4 � 1' ,� �• / t e �` � `� � " •4. t , ro' t��� ►, h �I's .It Him, {ttl3:.itf4�:i`t�d�i 4f 4�t'a� fit` .��t?�'r t� t�'•��i{ . ! ...14�1 - - ,. !1,{t�'�r�.�"�� �t'�"� �"�t�'i...�t"e N,tNT :',i 1N'BSA1� PWININ;G DEPT. CUM OF HUNIrINGTON MACH OCT f$11980 •t INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION P. A, flex 190 Hun ton:';'ach,CA 926 i From To Jim ralin Paul E. Cook J1 Direotor of Development Services Director of Public Works Date �•M1`x, Subject Comments on'Coastal Element ! October 13, 1980 ,pt . After reviewing the Coastal. Element report, X have the following comments , '., 1. on page 15, it is stated that over 3.2 million people viesited.the ;; � municipal pier in 1979. 1 believe the number of visitors was closer . +i to 1.5 million. 2. I ditsagree with the statement on page 24 that one of the. deficienciesi in the City.'s bicycle trail program•is lack of adequate xigning. • I feel that bike crossing signs are totally unnec6ssary; "..They are ; ' ignored by the travelling public and create u visual blight on the . . 7;1, landscape. I feel this statement should be deleted. The name state man( in made under Conclusions on page 27 and on page 153, paragraph t 4f. 3. on page 47, it in stated that if Alternative 2 or 3 is adopted, it is imperative that open space and setback be made. In light of our discussion at the Downtown Camm�tee meeting last weak, I feel the wording should be changed to open space or setback. 4. On page Wunder Conclusions, it is stated that improvement of visual qualities through regulation is necessary. I totally agree. ffowevor, �. thrit ahoisld include City signs for parking and traffic (such as the bike crossings) as wall . t. 5. I feel that ,the discussion on circulation on pages .113 and 115 is f misleading to. the layman in •that `you compare percentage iricreacess .' in trip ends between alternatives. This appaurs that Alternatives 2 � and 3 are undesirable because they generate more trips;. In reality.. the comparison should.be made between total traffic volumes .in the ►. area for each alternative and the capacity of the street system. I think you will find that there would be no difference in the level of service on the atreet system no matter which alternative is adopted. I feel this should be rawritten. On page 116 under Conclunionss you state that local traffic y generated t ; represents only a fraction of the projected volume on arterial high- is ways within the zone. I agrees with that statement but feel it should be discussed in the text. 6. It seems that the section on Hazards on page 117 is misplaced and ahould appear somewhere also in the report. t 7. As •Y've stated before, I feed it is a !Fallacy to adopt a plan for a, the downtown which depends; on beach visitors for nuccoon. Ninety- nine percent, of the visitors to the beach do not spend any money on the inland side of P.C.H. X've been told that many merchants do not want beachgoexe in thoir shops; because of shoplifting and the sand r. t , . A { • R e , 0AN42r + t "-.Memo to Jim Palin � October 13, 1980 Page 2 they track in. I feel the City's prime asset is not the beach but ' the ocean. Me should be encouraging visitors who are attracted by the ocean; who want to stay overnight in hotelar and who have money in their pockets. 1, r • References to"beach-related retail" on page 121 under Visitor- Serving and beachgoere or beach users on page 143 and,145 should be deleted or downplayed. ; 8. On ,page 146, •the statement is oracle that development in the downtown must be compatible with the character of the entire City. •. Frankly, I don't know what the character of the City is ands if I dial,, I'm not sure I would want it in the.downtown. I think; the downtown should be unique and quite unlike the rest of the City. • :' I feel the.laut paragraph on page 146 should give the option of. setback or open apace rather than a flat statement that 3 atorica , f 4 in the IMt for the first block. 9. On.page 150t._ a comma is needed between "protect" And "encourage" is under paragraph 2.. i 10. I would like to see a 2-1 added on page '151 that staters, "Assure maintenance funds' are appropriated- before projects proceed." 11. It appears that paragraph 6f on page 155 in contradictory to* 4f on page 153 and 6h on page 155. ' 12. Paragraph 7f on page 156 should include the Balaa.Chiaa area also f since PCH `is. within the City in that area and becauee .there is "a heavy litter. problem there. Also a statemFaiit to 'provide ongoing funds for litter control" should be added. r ,r. k 13. I •do, not understand the meaning of paragraph 7g.on page 153. It ` should be clarified. i 14. ' Why doesn'.t paragraph• 16d on page 166 include Newland and Duehard' and what does "signing" mean in this case? 15. 1 would recommond using the word "consider" rather than "ancourgge" '• in paragraph .16h on page 166. PECsjy w �� s( i 7 I 1 ' ' S i r . _ it,4 y ` _ .. •d fo: Jirn rolin, vireetor/� Vroms Leos rd wrlgfit 1U--ij-ov bev�:lopmentul hes3oT !eta, City of ti9 bob 15th St, M3 92.648, Uowntown band tlse for the Coastal Element 1 i Some reasons downtown commercial hasn't taken off j 1 , No Alan's been approveei so that people can know the rules. 2. Obstructionism by a few. See: f , attached clipping of "Editor's Mpilbag" letter. . various oftments in my letters listed under references below. What's needed (from p. 1, my 8-24-79 letter) � 3 . an' approved plan so that property owners and developers know the rules. . adequate and well-located parking, possibly a catalyst, such as restaurants on the land side of PCH. � We area re3sidents strongly support Alteirnative 2 t Most-• refer, a'2:=eCor , limit. , My policy is to include -any aompromiaes . In our propose not to 'propose less than what we want, then compromise up) . For example, '50% of us preferred limiting Townlot to homen 'on 50 foot lots, but we supported homes on 25-foot lots as a reasonable compromise. Altho we prefer a 2-ertory limit, I'Ve asked people to support Alterna- tive 1.; In, support of this: i. sea** • To the. Editor" {2 urges attached) • my enclosed 94-80'letter ."Downtown .Land Use Alternativeae+l. (I!d appreciate your telling me of any corrections to this lette ri .) 2. Qommant: If you aisk yoitrself..:if you'd like Alt.: .2 or` 3 infl.iated 'on where you live; you 'probably tx:�swe:r, "Not E' Then why ; even oonsietr doirij; it to someone else-? What other coastal pairklof'fli3: Is. stool► .activity recommended for? Wlty .try to oraen everything into one small area's . Some . parts of. coastal orange Cowity are. reduoine 12,000 proposed. homes down to 2,000 allowed. We've done the opposite out of ftrirness, compromise and practicality: Townlot and old Town already allow twice an many homes pear: aore. .than any other part of the olty _- avan more; than some condominiums, What more can anyone reasonably expect? 1leferenoes You ,may want to -scan my other letters (available from Juno Catalano) on Downtown L$nd. Use; i. 8-24- ., 79, Downtown band Use jjp 1-.3 1lovihtown commercial area Appendix A eummury of. 19?h comments by Urban Land Institute on rNtlevolo,ping the Ha downtown commercial are:n, 1?._26_Zq,_.iaown town land Use pl' 11-11 J- 12 20:12, Low"towwn Intensity hltul rirrtives Appnzidix i+ ,Yro'n and con's of High, Intermediate and Low Intensity 4. 4-�12t80 Uorintown Land Use Pp 1-1 pp 13�-14 4 block residential Area bounded by 'walnut, 3d and LakeOf TM�•[+•^+.--•.. s};ttv.'Y.w+.--. . .-..�..wr...«wwfCr.,.�a 1. .. ♦ :.Fl,.:l.'. .a'•.s.ns.•.1.-:u..4...,....Tf a.-.r^..i •-r:'..'.'. .a fi:'.:i-tf�K.•.Iw,/...rvr./rwMws.wrn,.Tw+t-Man lzwvt)fYfIYSMIYr,^•"^- } • 5 a : 1� rir�a. ein. �rAGt. r • EDITORS 1h•oUNIINGUM HACH NIViS•OCTOeta 10150 vi ll" n e, I MAIi.OAG Dear Editor: The planning Director 4 "A recommendation proposed compromises • HB TO, I d that downtown p p Mailbag ` A• reco'ntneridation that Huntington Beach to alleviate citizen From page S downtown 11paUngton Beach re• retain its village concerns. But at their ! elsewhere. taln'its.villpge atmosphere end atmosphere and 11.11.76 meeting PAC This was the kind of elmininate, high-rise buildings eliminate high-rise j refused any attempt to votin" by the PAC even x was madg,T'tu�sday Right by a buildings was made alleviate citizen after the overwhelming committee working on the city's Tuesday night concerns by their opposition at the CC 7 loc,lcoastalprogram: ay ng by a I negative votes on every hearing. I was on the At a Joint.meeting with the committee working on planning Dept. short end of every one elty'a Pisnning commission.the the city's local coastal Pilot,9 24.80j. 17•member Citizens Advisory program" (p. Al. Daily proposal: of these votes. Committ ee also made a strong . pil # Is.it any wonder no plea to nrfsar•ve the Bolsa CAlca Some wondered why *SO loot height limit downtown plan wa+ wetlands. y downtown (PAC voted approved in 1976? And k the recommendation to taatrs• downtown commercial - no heigin limit b•3), whose fault was it! ; twin the are: s village hasn't taken, off. The By consensus: no atmosphere also .wrould limit top•of•the-Pier plan height limit:across the , You can expect = het ht of buildlogs to threw proposed that the' S established:Townlot ' obstructionism,from a stet rs. fEw �rhen things don't �+ T'hecommlttcotalledtorrcaez• blocks along Pdclfic j residential area. trend two other canteen:. One j Coast Highway be 'Use 20+ TIf excess In 976 th :s they want. o would llmlt•buildlogs to six ' converted into a ` (after all redevelopment In 191b the Urban land stories and the other would Im• I Institute said, "The one •Poseatimitott2staries. parking lot. Property activity is financed, not thing the city ,can do, � Planning Commissioner ITalpb owners naturally 20•of total TIF funds as and be absolutely sure a ?Hauer said that the tort dmaity protested. in Montoya)for low and that their money Is recommendatiorlts the sstrtetype Their posters evolved , moderate-income hour• spent well is to Improve thing that has been advanced over-, .into an 38 million ing.(This would include the street amenities And the �rroar• for downtown lawsuit which' they'd rehab and senior 10 d revita7tutiom wittout produt:lrg drop it the city would citizens(sousing). put to new planlina- results. But a few have, "SomethlstsdranisticIsneedrd approve a plan to be fa{1ec12.1, + protested via the to,create a driving force to gat ; submitted by VTN. But i 'Delete eminent ,Chamber of Commerce .thingsrnovin ..• the VTN proposal domain as a function of ' the city's efforts :to "I've heard all tbese Writs fur unveiled on . May.. 6, redevelopment In the improve the streets. about .1s years.. Persoataly. .. .; 1976 was more extreme . Townlot, PAC voted to ;•Bauer stud,"1 would be willing to ' �iglveupkrwdensityifl� Wen �'1� the opposite keep eminent domain 1 They Hear this will. things &mad in the wn, . di ec�lon: high-rise 2. (Same business hamper their getting which has the blithest erfr+ae rate buildings along PCH People who . decry their way later on. ;Inthecitynndatrd*upgrading. 33 from lake to bill with a government poorer, and It's time to step tip• "Thougtinesaisoverwbdasirrj 1 20•><tary behemoth interference seem toeing around those alongPaciflcC033111lglsway. � betwet;n 3rd and 5th anxious to use this same who'll obstruct uo the About 11 ptrcent of ttstt total Streets Mackin the government power ! detriment of other area of the.city Iles within tint g coastal torso Which erteads along view of the pier. against,homeowners in, downtown property nine miles of oceanfront from the . At the 197b 'City areas that are j owners, and of 'the Council (CC) public • developing well on their commurilty in }fearing S00 to aoo own). general). It's,time to ' favored low •height ' 'Taff Increment support a plan that VILLAGEO 0 ' limits and protested Financing funds shall go gives sufficient against high rise, to school districts if the economic return, has Santa Ana River to Seal Beach- eminent domain, the ( project works a the market potential and Inland up to a mile III some hardship on the school and • 'is generally sections, destination resort The advisory committee's re• concept and the use of , district. PAC changed acceptable to the ppoort Is now in the hands of the Tax increment shall to may thus i community, Alternative Ylatuiing COmmissioa which will making is meaningless Financing(tIF). g g t (low intensity) is such hold the first of several public Even after his I and showing that t¢ey a plan hearings Thenplan must be approved by sfwwing,the;controlling i Claims thatvTtFhwillir o of y Leonard IYtiQc 1 the ranmluloa and city Council t larccs of PAC (Project ; Nunlfnpian Deaclr befort becoming part of the city'y Area Committee causefCott.�i hardship coastalrlemtslt. basically represented After U,t local coastal Program downtown commercial r!s approved by state and reghmi property owners) coastal commlssiorss,rantrols of ado ted r " ublic-be- n Q, development now exercised by damned"altitude• little ��, �•'r the eomsniulon will be returned totoralgovernment. concern was shown for citizen concerns. 1 6} r r is ' _ J • �'.' J r r S •1 11 Z i f r • i S • i let r .: s 1 7 • .t • • • • i f Z ! . r i • r • u i • 7 t ♦ t . ♦ .. 1: • Z r a i. • - • i i • t 1 1 •it • " '� J J i '� . • Ir ' • 7 • J f 1 • _ A4. f • t , J ,..+. �.- . t 1 t .1 7 l • t • a 1 t � L � • • : J y If • Z S , t ' t •: is • • ♦ i r a. i + • • • l t S�,t M11 `�� � • • t t. • / i S ti.. , .!r r ,a • / is/:�r P P` r • J •Ert1:�j�t .4,�r�.ti,f�,�4#: • • t J r i • � r 1� k`.t't _� 1.• tr. a . ,. y�t i.4J '- i Z • i f'1.5• 1•1* t. T �t�•��ri/Jt,� M. 'fit ��s ,� •��yY'j i �T� `M�• t'f; tf• 1 f �w �4(, •���� �i r��{�il��1 4'��•�•��� ��.��'°,,� �� �h�! � � `'�',r�'•�'���� '4'� "�! �°�t� `.� '�!, :{�R'`�7tt' r.".�' f ( 't t- ;�'.�,,� ; '� }�7{4! •1 �'�'! �� �Yy� ✓��� r� .� 3'� � �f r. � ;i ��` t+�' �� ���'��ti� � t =�i 4 i• ��� �� L� �� •ijj fa t'� ��' 'j, ., �,� .��•.1 i�k� x+ ,� � �{,t 4 *f• t �•� � �•s irtrat, ��� + F�+t '-�', T r� Q� •�',�: .}f1, a� 1.,h. yIt l� yr,•t7 .i���►�♦ z �,�,f • �t �''' �', ,��. J•� V c,�t1 .����. '• 'ri�''+ t y. ���.+ � �, � . �,ii ,� � �;�.�Yrt.,, �j •� :{; fir i` �`j`J�'�,1 � ) �+ �� �`, .� ( ��� , r y t�i' ' is �•tR '.',r'f� 1 '�t t�- ' `j � � i •1.'T. t �l� 1�� � � l ,�{� • �p;'.� �.., an' i <� 1 .J1 1 '' �: .t 17 ;�. • • MIT +t�ti �4' �, ► a �� ,� , f 4 1 �. . p �� :. t. !►. `r��.. ��r _h 1 r f ,, Kl�f , �.:'As?Mr4a►C -f rat: ►t y �, �� f !1 7♦�j` �x { t, },1 !� f ;71 t I l rs 1� . . t� r• •? V.I,t 1 •h 't .(t L' *�. ,.. ..a . � , . , � '�., A j.i�k .'��• } ,�r,, � ,,� i•3X � .1 �kk�� r •� 1' 1,, 1' �, ra't � �,t rr z4r D' # MA, �, t orate ' 'Nome parts of otinty are reducing 12,00""�)ropoaed homes dawn to 20000. But Tq*nlot and Old Town alr ady allow twice as many homes- per acre than any oth'r part of tho city -- even more than some condominiums. What more can anyone reasonably expeot? ' 3•- Regional commerolal usas can't be supported in the downtown area because of (1) coutpeting regional uneu, (2) no convenient freeway aoceses, and t3) no two main corridors nearby. 11. They will cost much more in city aervioes and may hurt the 'city's tax base because of the vary largo amount of residantoel included. "etnrse Prop aitl,on 13o added roaldential becomes morn of a tax liability. City cervices include sewers, drainage, water supply' transportation (roadways and parking). . education (new faoilities?), .police and fire. Crimo increases faster than density increases. 5. They may be itoree than alternative 1 for the economic health or the 'entire oo®unity. 6. They'd create circulation prollemn that couldn't be solved. Traffio up 100 and 150. per cent for alternativas 2 and 3 (72 por sent for Alt. i). 7. They'd ,require 'rodsvelopment for lot coneolidation rind to provide parking structures. This is leas feasible mince Prop. 13 since Tax Inoroment, Finnnning would provide loan funds. S. They Ire oontraty to the character the oo=unity (esp4oially area resiidenta) deairos to eatublinh and maintain. They'd drazati.cally change the orientation of tho area in a "ny area reaidenta wouldn't like. 9• They'd create intensified congestion and conflict of urea in tho o!,er area. 10. Redevelopment may force come mmnll property-ow'norm out. Delaying taotion by a few obstructionist© may make some think nothing tall evar happen -» and they'll sell out cheap. .For these many reasons. Alternative 1 (lows xntenohty) in beat. ''` j 'T�.�;�i 1{MwS-..'•.tC:+Se.Mf 1Y..I:{:.1 ♦ ...0 M.r.....-, •.w..a..—.,....�........,.. .r r w w..,..w..w-..w...e.-.w- .y -i#,�j 4t.1�1'. _ .......,.....,-.... .... .. ..... . .... .._. ........__. ,..-,tom r i i a a ` r� ► ` r ` r f4 1 t , h ► s 4 { 1r,v }5 Afi x� y YR 'ti. �( . r •.,yti t` t} �� yd�`�R�!..t�� si{�i!��}�"{„ "i y. {}�, ¢ ��xk t'�`!• �xq�t ,V��` �. '�i1'�"1�, i h'�� 1�" T'6. �t+�' �I �.r �y,�''{�.° .@� u,9 {�J k'�'�`�ri,�,i j�� �� 97v "�Q����1}3�t �d •"`1 ��q i � ,Y# ?ri1} � ' !,�_1a !�r �� e. , y7, � �' � b�! r � �� '4�•'F� '+ { �Si �`y s .!' r �� � f r,� +ur �{i, � t�`l � }p '[}((q��'���'1t�'t{y.' t , ��.�±�r x,� � ' .�`1V x+:�• .�.. {, {� ��0 `!{1.�{r[F xa�ti.�t. �}y1' lF s Y 1',, �! ( � � tl � � G�a '��y.;j '�°:� i�i x".9 �Y11.r2'w�s flt �`,� {A "T4'� T/ AL •� �'{ � � ���f�ti�.�.`+[ �\��' 1:1, rRNlsi\. � 1YfG• tt ,�i� { „ ;+,�' {� d I+ ,,�w r 'F'P"�'� .' •� 6 YrY.lt �:t�tx?K . ���ii_ � .7� t'r.�`r�a`�t 5(�kl,.�.♦ ,�lCi�".J.• i,ethit�r�t'�ti�i 'F}R,���, � '!{rii�ic�C�i.����� I � 1 • i I � I • ♦ I l 1 !ii h•�1.. .?�Yt ,,i, �1 •ri I�t��t t � �+' �, •� •E � ��:;tr�� ?�� '���i�. �L�"/��• s �t�r�•,,�i '�:��'' �,��`xt�';+;'�'i��., ,was" ;'Y,��'L�'��,�{ �y, .} .. ���� tk,, 1 �'� t(t,# `�,k \ 1 � �' t.� " t. 121 �; �,vU' U ' 1t+�y r. "�i ��•�t � rr �',`h• t x , _ a ,fit � 7 � � 1,�i� }�"� ��'Y i .�, �{ a 1 a,f i� � ♦ t! +�.x�.} 5 �a �t r��f "t5.t'��. � rn t S„ � 'p�"��:;.��f}' � ��!` L�, .����, ,�� f � :.$ lr 9' �* � '+ t. ��•r�, �° •i � , t,,}}1,, !.t.�at '�'',�I '• �-' 't'x: � �t�i '� h "� � '��j'd�[ � y .�} �, �1y+� �ll�.� 1��l •`� L}. +t�F: ��'.'i A` k,r� �} ���� j•,; 1, � ��1 V '�ty.� 1f,"fnR � >:�,� 3a. . �, ��{ �+�� may.�'E11' y'�.d ( ,'� .A AO 411 r���'�• �'���3��i.��• �+,�� t )k"�;]��{.y�.t' ;�4 � � 'Yw � J}j� '� +� �:1 �s X+ �+` ,{,�ia ,� R � i����>' � .�� � ';,f", rA � { a � I•Y '} t�� 1 G " � �;�,}� •, \ tr e�� '� ��>,'p 1�� ! k��,j�#�t �, � ��"�f} �t tr 11�.(y.'•�1 iwE;�'�p -;y a;`�', .'�tj} r �,i�1 t ' � '�R'��� � .o� i• t �11 t tr Z�.r: � .`N i' M!.1.Ry � �yAREE5 Aft 1� fff 4 f lit; 4 Vill f ! . R 4 4 "a alit, 1 C ,� �`�;' 'fit• .k`�` t: • �','1.f.f tit'"'�i r l� • _ •Ir"m a • •1.7-3 W I j. +! L'• x • • • • ► S ♦ • t i • _! • 1 f L • 3 • i • 2 l °� , • r i • 1 ► • a r : t i f s t • • I • _k • t i J • C • i • • • ' r { ;� Y x S(A. ZA { ♦1�: ; .t Rtiti \yt} � t" •. �• � � S' a •F � fl�' ��� lq� � t'; r t��`! � �J�d} y !•(+ i ��H 1t�•r i 1. .^ , !:''� �t'S°a` qti �ti '' 1�• � � t3•ti l ��`�5 :�1• � �,. �♦ J � at { ��T d, .�1, �.�7� �,' � �' �1 .�� `� Ly,lt ! i � � ti t{/����'��},`1 }{''�, ;�. '� t ' �",t{�'�k / i`''�zj��+�- •� � �i R �GI'��.�� 1 � Y ♦ R• 1 '�' 1 ,4=•r ,� tfw��`�� j�' ,' .j•�; '= jl t ''�i7 � k`• '?� t. � "V !!•�'4`�!�►�� �. �, �y �t =: •1.�,: �`��'E+, r� '�'t� � ' + ."yx�lt • YL} �i�jr,,�; }U�� `,� �i !}7t `^,. ,( �t� i 'i';,�►�����►���t � !��� � f r`�{'t;!?� ~ � r � „ �' '� ,���t �4}`.Y � z . �. �• ,•5, tj .� �'Lt� � � ��r � �L �.lr. t. � �i r t y r { ���'!'1', -1"r' ' Y:�� �1'lft�h �. 14 1� _X -�� � 't �`��r• �• � 'ti'��� � L,l� � � � ��� # r� ���• � i �. �Z ! + r !f w �'�' � Y ��,�:d;' k•�tz��� 1} t a �, ',,i,� 4YY�� �, i i,� �i^����`;••��1� t� �ti '� ,r 7 .t pll�� l ,�i �� 1 `� `, t1��t • � � �, T � l .t �",� � , 1 t _ y /#1J' ' � P i {1� •} ,`A�1�� � { a• �} �� ��i �+•�4�' ,�7 !. �+' 1, Signal ( ndmark,Inc. ' r'91 %olarii C1100 'rip.C61110#ru6 02;1.1 ''^phone 1114)919.6200 October 7, 1900 city Planning Commiaeion City of Huntington Beach REs Draft Coastal Element Commissioners: On behalf of Signal Bolsa Corp. and Signal Landmark, Inc. , the owners and manages of private lands in the unincorporated . territory of Orange County known as Bolsa Chica, I wish to thank your Commission for the opportunity to comment on the 'draft Coastal Element for the City of Huntington Beach. At this time we wish to limit our comment to the observation that the California Coastal Commission has )specifically ex- cluded Bolsa Chica from the jurisdiction of the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program. Nevertheless, we are not un- mindful of the interest of the City and its residents in the future of Bolsa Chica and therefore we have encouraged . participation by City representatives in the orange County North Coast LCP Technical Advisory Committee. We are sin- cerely hopeful that this cooperative effort between the City and the County will satisfy 10041 as well as regional interests in this important coastal area. With respect to the City's draft Coastal Element, we appreciate the staff's courtesy in providing copies for our review. We will submit our detailed comments in writing. Very truly yours, Wm. R. Allen . Senior Vice President WRA:dp • ;r 0111 of TAO Signal Compvn.111 k ,d�„Aj�4' '' ��"".'t_����• k'q.� $" � fir.7 .A-..'Fa... 'IL'C4C �i T�_,.. .�����it�%A4re"��..�5`,...F""�$•3 +� �: .� ��i•�u''�dL'..�.a ,lid'�!^"'^_S"""£['.._'.i4"4.;1?:CA*fl�kl+!!wrtrew,. ' h Mr, 4m Perlin, Director .of Planning; Department of Development Services City of Huntington Beach P.O. -Box 190 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA - October 7, 1980 Dear Mr. Palin, It gives us great pleasure, to con& ratulate you, your staff, and the ad- visory committee,.,on re-iching the draft Coastal Element stage. of your . ;, local Coastal planning process. We appreciate the considerable effort by your staff and the violunteer citizens advisory committee to produce this draft document. • . The Local Coastal Program process is a relatively new one and a chal- lenging one which requires application of Coastal Act . policies to the . ., ;= unique characteristics and planning concern of each coastal Jurisdiction. The draft Coastal Element of your city indicates a good faith effort on ,•' the part of your staff and .advisory committee to meet this challenge. Enclosed please find the Coastal Commission staff comments on the draft element. As the draft undergoes public and agency. review, we may have additional commento but this letter summarizes our major comments to this point. We offer the following comments and in some cases, sugges- tions of policy modification. We hope you -will consider these cov=nts when taking action on the draft Land Use Plan. Sincerely, /.4vov •,5 , ' Bob Brown David N.ySmith Chief Planner Deputy Executive Director California Coastal Commission South Coast Regional Commission aB/DNS: fj w r j4 I u "� .�� 5 ; _� �" F �r`M rt� ti"� C�': y�?��`" �="..s!st '�",�{ �5�,*'�"T���"*<, ✓ �'�`P_u� .},�:�� a r .-'4�,-p:k.' M^'Y.::•��Y•Y..il j,�:�t��'�:.r.• y . �W ' , COASTAL C044ISSION STAFF C%RIENTS OIi DRAFT COASTAL ELEMENT Page 23, 115, Policy 16(e) : Regarding the issue of beach parking, we , agree with the policy tocus to preserve existing parking in the coastal zone: However, in order to assure that, and also to, ensure that any in- tensification -of uses in the coastal zone do not adversl;7 impact -public accePs, policies must be developed to ensure that all new,.development provides adequate, parking, as required. for by Section 30252 of the Coastal Act. If existin" & parking standards are to be used, the polioy should so indicate and say how existing policies provide adequate parking. Figure 2: The proposed bikeway location should be modified so .1%2, . to not e Located within any wetland area, of the Bolsa Chica as identified in' the Commission's preliminary Designation of Wetlands Determination for the Bolsa Chica for LCP Planning purposes. (March-1980) Pa a 36 Definitions: The definition .of "degraded",.,as it applies to wet- lands should a according to the. Department of Fish and', Game definition as stated in the draft report Clarification of Determinations for Bolsa Chica Wetlands- Consultation Draft", March, 1980.' That definition states that degraded means: .' "A wetland which has been so severly altered by human activities or Catastrophic events that its attendant natural pirocosses have been sub- stantial)y impaired and are not capable of recovering and sustaining a level of biological productivity typical of similar wetlands not severely altered, without major restoration activities. Such areas are cbarac- terixed •by lower levels of wetlands related fish and wildlife and/or diminished rates of production and accumulations or organic material Which are much lower than other similar wetlands not severly altered by human activities." Pate 62 Definitions: The definition of wetland should be that of Section 3D 21 of the CoasEal Act; that is, "Wetland" means lands within the coastal zone which tray be covered per- iodically or permanently with shallow water and include saltwater marshes open or closed brackish water marshes, swamps, mudflats, andfens". Figures 4.2 4. 3 9.4, 9. 5 and Page 166 Polio 16(c) : Pursuant to Sec- tion3iFZ33 of t" -he coastal road extension-into sat and areas are not permitted. Therefore, geese figures and policies should be modified to delete or relocate any proposed road extensions in wetlands areas, such as the extension of Bolsa Chica Street, Hamilton Avenue extension and on Figure 9.4 and 9.5 any other extensions which may be located in areas preliminarily determined by the Cormnission as wetlands in the Bolea Chica. Pages 66 and Figure 6. 1 and Pn&es 131-132 : The !&'D area proposed for residentlal development was indicatedin the Co=ission' s preliminary determination for the Bolsa Chica, Exhibit 3, as being "Farmed wetlands . The Commission staff has sent an inquiry to the U.S. Fish Lind Wildlife Service regarding this area, in light of addit.ionnl field work which was i I r' i to have taken place. llr.Lil such inquiry is answered. and a clarifica- • tion made on this Area the Commission staff will reserve comments . Pages- 93. and 16!. Polic ,15(b) : In order to promote and preserve housing opportunity fvi:aincome groups, pursuant to Section 30213 of the - Coastal Act, either guidelines should be developed for conversion of residential units as a part of the LUP or a prohibition against conver- sion should be imposed until such guidelines can be established. Page 98 Figure 9. 1: a) Pursuant-to the Section 30240 of the Coastal Act a sewer extens on in a wetland would not be a permitted use, b) The, LUP does not adequately demonstrate the need for a sewer extension-to serve existing developed areas. Pase 177 and :Policy 15(d) : By previous action the Commission has found that mo lie home parks provide a unique force of housing for persona of low and moderate inco:ae. Where mobile home parks are existing, an exclusive Mobile. 11ome Zone designatfon should be assiggned; or a one to one replacement of mobile home spaces with other mobile homes space or. with other low and moderate income units within the coastal zone should be provided. Page� 152 153 Policy 4 Policies relating to vertical and lateral actress should be separated. Suggested policy is as follows: 4. The City-shall take all necessary steps to protect and defend the public's constitutional guaranteed ri!�,hrs of access to and along. the shoreline: At a minim-in, the City shill accept offers . of dedication- which will increase public access and recreation opportunities consis- tent with the City's ability to assume maintenance and liability. 4a . New development between the first public road and the shoreline shall �rsnt an easement to allow vertical access to the mean high tide line unless: - adequate access exists nearby or is oroposed by the land use plan within a reasonable distance-along the shoreline; (with some type of definition of "adequacy and/or "reasonable distance") or; - Any form of access including "paces and repass" at the site would result in inrritigable adverse impacts on areas designated "Conservation" by the land use plan.; or - Findings are made, consistent with Section 30212 of the Coastal Act that access is inconsistent with public safety, or military security needs; or - The parcel is too narrow for an adequate buffer separating the vertical accessway from private residence and would therefore adversely Affect the privacy of the property owner; and 4b. New development between the first public road and the shoreline shall grant an easement to allow lateral public access along Cho abore- line. In no cane shall the dedicated easement be required to be closer than 10 feet to a residential structure . In Addition, nll fences , pri- vate property signs. and other obstructions that many limit lateral public access shall be removed as a condition of development a proval . Lateral access should be described from a fixed inland point where possible. Io -� 2 . +��`t]MrrlG...� .;,b."4 *,�-i..:..+: ... .,_ � i. ,' Gi ".w.` fiL�" "' _ 5bo6ld, the city feel Chat site specifir, circumstances may obviate the need for provision of lateral public access, guidelines which delineate tlioce specific circumstances should be developed as part of the LUP. Pa e.,l Tj!Polic ',9 a Pursuant, to Section 30240 of the Coastal Act, , . - alteration to Papitic Coast Highway which will destroy or degrade wet- land• habicat should be prohibited. Pa'se 157 Pali'c 9•(6) : Pursuant to Section 30240 of the Coastal tact the foI ow ng additionaL language is suggested: "Require new development conti uous .to wetland areas td protect a ainst any significant disruption of habitat values and ehall include• bu fern or other means i4hich will consist. . . Pag�ee 165 P l.i6y l5(F) : To be consistent with the housing protection policies o -ithe coastal Act, the policy should be modifier'. to ensure continucd'affo::dability by requiring.-resale controls on all now affor- dable for hale units . r - 3 � `1 J: a '.rt^ •iy, r, BEA'Ai su i to 324 r. Subway Terminal Building PLANNING U:1'T• 417 South Hill street goberl London Moope, P. Goo Anpc Zeo, California UCT C. 1980 90013 P. U. Box 190 (213) Huntingtai - ::Ii,CA 926418 626-9404 243-7186 j October 2, 1980 City of Huntington Beach Planning Cflmmi$sian For Consideration at Public P.Q, Box 190 Hearing: October 7, 7980 ` Huntington Beach, Cal. 42648 Re: Huntington Beach Local Coastal Ilan Mills Land & Water Company ; State of California properties Beach Boulevard/Pacific Coast Highway. Doar Commissioneras As it, pursues the challenging and difficult task of drafting.`acid preparing the land use element of the City':s Local Coastal Program, . we would urge the Huntington E"61i Planning Cots ission to take a serious second look at the adjoining parcels owned by Mills Lucid Water. Company and the State of California at Beach Boulevard and 's Pacific Coast Highway. r` A substantial portion of these properties has been depicted ah "wetlands" by the California Department of Fish & Game and the California! Coastal Commission staff in San Francisco. The City's planning staff has concurred 'in ouch "wetlands" designa- tion for the undeveloped area on the Mille/State parcels. This is shown in the told-out map (Figure 6.2) between pages 68 and 69 of the August 1980 draft of the Coastal Element. rn our review of the matter with your Director of Development Ser- vices, Jim Palin, and Senior Planner June W. Catalano, we were informed that the draft does in fact reflect the Department of Fish i Game and Coastal Commissionn staff positions also, that the City planning department must be given some affirmative direction before any stuAy of possibla alternatives to the "wetlands" use can be made by the City. We balieve that Huntington Beach has much to gain in making an objective, indepandent consideration of the "wetlands" aspect of land use planning for this area. The Mills and State properties are significant fr= the standpoint of size and proximity to major traffic corridors. As a reault of State legislation, Mills Land 6 Water Company has 1 the right to re-acquire the ourplus Caltrans property taken from � Hilda for the ill-fated Pacific Coast FreewAy. Tho objective in } city of Huntington Beach Planning Commission October i, 1980 - Page two any possible purchAse `of the abandoned freeway right of way is clearly to reassemble the acreage into the original Mills i ownership for a planned development embracing the entire p,- rcel. In this respect, Mills looks to the City for some direction in overall planning objectives for the site which is presently char- j . . . acterized by various undesirable aspects. Many sees and complain of the area as an "eyesore"I particularly as to the Cabrillo mobile Home Park and tho boat anleo/storage facility on the State's Coast Highway frontage. 9 Y. 9 Mille' independent experts have-determined that the Fish ` Game P I� and Coastal Commission staff. designation of. the "wetlands" for a i.. ious "gerrymandered' ortio of the Mills State .t�ite is . cur , P }� / factually substantiated. Such designation is factually inconsis- + tent in terms of the existence of almost identical plant and wild- }. life on amity-owned and other properties immediately adjacent. '•:.� Those rather strangely, hav© not been declared "wetlands. One such parcel, bordering the Mills/State properties on the north, " hasi been removed from the coastal tone. We understand that the ' owneris proceeding with development plans. A portion of that property is nevertheleas shown as a "coastal salt marsh" on the ? aforementionad wrap (Figure 6.2) of the August 1980 Coastal Element ' draft. E'I Historically, all of these parcels together with a major portion + of the surrounding area comprised a vast tidal marshland. Over the pact 30 years, however, these properties have been greatly altered. This is at onco apparent in a present inspection of the area. After the direct tidal inlet in tho vicinity of Pacific Coast ° I Highway and Howland Street was filled in the late 19409 or oarly 1950s, the "Wetland" characteristic of the area was dramatically + . changed. Ensuing development, replete with thouoand3 of cubic i ;lards of till, and transformation of the surrounding area into }: commercial, industrial, and residential uses has directly impacted and bolstered the change. Those traces of salt-oriented vegetation remaining in the undeveloped segments of the Hills and State par- cola are substantially "degraded." We have been advised that the Mills and State properties, by themselves, are not functional any more as a tidal marsh and are not sufficient in size to wnrrant restoration as "wetlands. " Con- trary to the general designation by Finh z Game and Coastal Com- mission staff, the existing Mills/State site is not supportive of the wide range of vegetation and wildlife historically indigenous to tidal marshes. Hills urges the City of Huntington Beach to review objectively all facto relevant to the ecological status of the Mills/:state ' �:� � �, . ,.. ,� r �.,.;.� ..e , ., '.� ���' „way► p r i �e r City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission October 2, 1980 - Page three site as it re' seintl exists, and to balance the same with long- range p ann ng and social considerations. This should Le done now in the preparation of the City's 7.CP independently of any pre-determined "wetlands" designation by other f� agencies. I .: Mills has owned the subject property since 1901. Because of this long-term involvement, Hills shares a certain concern-for the ultimate bast interests of Huntington Beach. These interests may not be realized unless the' Planning Commission and other City departments take some initiative in the planning process. Someelme ago, the undeveloped part of the Mills/State site was set: aside by tho City as a planning reserve---for consideration of a number of possible land used. This is shown on .the fold-out map (Figure 10.7) between pages 130 and 139 of the August 1980 Coastal Element draft. Ift believe the City should not abdicate its right to plan the uses ; best suited for this important and strategically-situated site. At ' the very least, the Planning Commission should be firm .in preserving for future consideration various alternative uses for the properties involved. This will not he possible if the 'wetlands" designation should be eonfiraed in the coastal element,- but can only ba achieved by restoring the planning reserve designation and making sure that it is incorporated in the land use element of the City's LCP. On behalf of Mills Land 4 Water Company, ► Respectfully, ROBERT LONDON MOORE, Jr.. Property Manager r cat Jim Palin, Director i Planning a revelopment Services June W. Catalano, Sonior "Planner Carol G. Wynn Hugania Hoore, Directors {' Hills Land 6 Water Company •--- t it I 1 yy F �'�Y•',�"J"Y,ii!".ielw."C:i}nES ti'u'r"4,_"�.5'9��ti '. Oct. 28, 19aO MOLOGICAL nYAWATION OF ltII.T.S IAIM ct VAM CO. FARM AND ,W ACM STATE LAUD The Mile Land and Water Co. and adjacent parcels Msently support a partial salt marsh, itiaos lets in t + and ItitatLM s declining rant of a anou extsasive ecoary�atata. ; MOWION 1.} The area not contains only two of the four plant s.aaooUtiona or cones that an Meent in a normal salt marsh'(prescat - aiddle littoral sons, upper littoral tones abs=t - lawn littoral some, transitional sona). 2.) The I&A contains only NO) of the �,, comma salt emreb plant species characteristic of southern California, salt marshes. 3.} The plant growth is geneza}ly tlmaiaat, much of the domize nt nicklewesd (salig2Mla al bss recently died, and plant reproduction is laeldng (axcopt for , f rely species respoodiag to man-made disturbances). 1►IiIItAIS 1. • } The bolo a-ground (c�3-drel2is�) orgaais�w (invertebrate tuianls) are alaeoat totally C absaat.. These missing enimis play grItIgal DIU in caaverting,inorganic end orgudc nattor into useable food& for higher vertebrate uaiaalo such as Yish and birds, Moat of the bird species that utilise this area Rea unable to fullfiU their daily requiareAmts on these lands becausa of the absence of food. The only important, and almost azc.'Wivo, native wildlife use of the exam at present is by birds. Thaso birds use the area almost solely for resting and loafing and probably do no because the few reining wetlands is the raen becorze ovr.rcrowde:d (aborebirds azd waterfowl become restless and leeve when crowded boyond a certain sl:acitg). 2.) The MAJO Land and Water Parcel Iecka the diversity of vildlife habitats usually faumi Pi salt autrshaa. There are eaaarstially only 2 habitats rozAl Ling, open scud flato and dsoliair4 picklevaed ot=&i. t i • �"1 ram, 2. ximm Ca == I+UtiO'1'IONS OR CONDIZ`ZOM 1.) The area has Lean denied normal tidal flow for a periad long enough to allow the vegetatiou to becom decadent (pernistiug, but not ft=tionivs) and hen rc+7ulted in the death or lose of east of the salt-Warah aataLlsc (outaide of "y !'the highly mobile birds that can leave and obtain food elssvhare). 2.) The remant harsh is no longer subject to stisilation ► oc"a stones or by'large inputs of fresh water (e.g. presently asses is no renewal or shook by deposition# excavation, mouelr4s or byisataat ctzangea in salls:f nor ii there pleat reproduction without ovorwholaing freshwater in uta). 3.) The presml: ground water is app:-7.vxtly an me-is nature and tinder ocean control. Under pristisw conditions the atquifm of thin marsh were alnat csrtaix►ay ' filled with fresh crater with a contimous fresh-water flow (hrdroptaties grr.ssure) from the land to the nee: This salt-water intrusion is an 4.) An absence of certain key organisasa that are involved in the converslan# traasfor, and flow of nutrients through the marsh and bayroed to the coastal watere and z the fisheries rowan: there (*.a, eelgraaa, spartina grasrse fiddler crabs, and gbant ahvdap). r CCiMl'TIONB LILY FM TUS MMRAT'ION Off TS SW M= ON TO nId.L3 LAND dt W!'flM CO. AIM AWACM PAFX=s (1poring ecowaic, ongineoring, and social or V1i.tical condde:ations) 1.) A direct opening to the aft to permit salt ester exchange or tidal flushing, The two apanirre in tits Orsra Counts Mod Coutrol Channel presently allow cult water @ats^y► frU do to in an sbsnorml fashion. The midUs litto-ml sans of an unaltered marsh is not normally floodoa as consintantly and with an sawh water as presently raimbas this marsh through than* levee openings. Bct wire isportantly, the openings do not allow for the proper daily, drainmge (at low tide) of the soils or sutwtrat4. This lack of draimav bAn psobsblyr lam to the ext*nsivo 19W fill of picklewead on the Mlls Land and Water end State parcels. 2.) Aorcn:zg of Adjacent ;=parties back to wetlands statua. If the sirs-auniing 3' und4veloped lsndn sr* developed, eraiaagervd species habitrt and the all important buffer zones will be lost and bird utilization will drop drasuatically. This includes the parcal lying between the Hills Land and Water Co. and the ehopplog center (ialarui and to the north) and the now parking, lot wast'of Roach Xvd. Kost of the marsh birds tend to avoid anew Lu idd h the view at their eye level or horizon in rent4L0tod or obstructed. 3.) ff"Oval of th+s surrovm4ing present develop rita6 such sA the boat yard, the trader court betvaeu .the Ortage County Mod Control Channel and Pacific Coast Higtwalr the power Lin" that crcos the sarsh, and that portiaa of the frout- AV road that extends aftward boyand or zouth of the Beach Blvd., shopping � canter. 4.) Hasoval of the paridne lot (Under oonstru action) an the vast aids of lunch Blvd, and replacsns4t of the two ine4equate culretto under Heath Blvd. vith a acumv or.bridgo. This .vould allov water, fish, acd fowl to m" sore freely lotoo.an j the fry and saltwater portion of the sarsh and Liars&" the wotlsod diver- ; sity (same fresh-vaterr warsh In located along the vast aide of H440h nv4.). .) Restrict HOsquito abstownt activities to allow natural insect pop dations to lire, ; return, and U rivs. j 6.) Prohibit the use of herbicides on the evrnuading highway abouldors und along tho G Flood Control Ounal. 7.) Redirect any totr9at runoff an that it does not eater the sarsibland thereby preventing the ecoidiental av!evy of toxic-opal caterial.s. B.) Post the area to entry, snd,if that failay tba aarahland should be fenced. 9.) Heintroduco the sisalsg pLait and aataal species to hasten the roetoratioa, or Unit for nrtur+s to recover on its ore. 10. ) If these 9 stapo are token a assll, jjAx --j, Stior>a ralt namh evald be re-established that vould provide saga wild`ife needs. It nothing is done avid the proposed surrounding davelop2ent is carried out, the ; reesining umaaed/urAsterainod lands will contznu,e to decli o and wildlife utilization (even it it's Just for rteating) will be reduced. Certain phases of future developeont and possible accidents nay accelerate the finlaVdaniso of the rarahlsnd c-cosyrutea in the' vi.cinl4y of Fkach Blvd. and Pacific Coast Higl&.vay. �� 4. l9illa Land and water Parcal Sumsaarf of Findings 1. Thb vegetation On the Mills Land and Water Co. land represonta a resuat of a once extustvs salt saran. 2. The present vsgt; &&ion is Mails to tha diddle li.ttoril sons of an undisturbed salt marsh, but is decadent and no longer fur.-tioning normally. (An of Oct. 198Q, alwat all of the pickleveed appears tc be dead.) j 3. only one out of four plant associations or =ss, and only 8 out of the 21 speoios that are oosmeoa to southern C4LUforaia salt soarshaa, are presasa: on the Hills property. 4• Almost all of the vd-dv*3Jin# animals are currently ebeent, probably because of tho long period of inalation frost sea-water flow and exchange. 3. the eadanprsd Belding's Uvarmoth Sparrow was obssrrrod on the proporty, but the retest (uaautlmrIMd?) openings in the Csrazo County Flood Control Lrrea have appar=tly rsavlted in the temparary setback sand possible destruction of almaat all of the Beldin In SavanaLh Sparrow habitat (stands of picklevotd). Other adjacent pucels tandergoing development have (or had) siiailar andwWred species habitat, soma of which is in better condition. ' 6. The land is prl icily used as a resting and loafing area for aigratoiy► and local ahorebirds and gulls. toads for meat cf these and other birds are largoly abyiont in the mxMah. 7. The !tills parcel imutains vetlanda that are comparable to the State, Cit.- of Buuticgtan Bes►ch, and privately-owned parcels that have been or are co=ittad to development. � U Richard J. Vogl Professor of Biology California State University, lea Angeles f yy yy. 1fi inM.«N. -�1yT, f'k.M. i•.'",il', fin' '$on Beach Compab ' 2110 MAIN STREET,HUNTINOYON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92640 .I! l rTw ;O+ .Bar CH 17141980g351 PLANNING DEPT. L A.YOUNG 110Y 4 igoo. VICE PRESIDENT•OENLFIAL MANAGER P. D, pox 190 November 4, 1980 Hualingtw Dauh,CA 92648 COASTAL ELEMENT DOWNTOWN PLAN Members of .,the Planning Commission City of Huntington Beach California Dear Members: The Planning Conanission at their October 28, 1980 meeting -• f decided by Straw vote to reconmand Alternate 3 for the "Downtown" planning area. The recommendation also tncludes 'a proposal to change the derAgnation on all property within the area shown for high density residential use to medium density residential use. ` We request" the Planning Commission to reconsider this action as it appliea, to the property bounded by Lake Street, Pacific Coast Highway, Delaware Street and Atlanta Avenue, and re- � designate the area for high density residential use. We offer the following reasons for this requests j_ ' Y 1. Alternative 3 will permit a relatively high intensity development which will require a higher residential density within the surrounding area to support the � commercial, office and other uses called for in the plan. # ' It is pointed out in the Draft Coastal Element that as residential development intensifies it is expected. }' to stimulate new office/professional uses. 2. The Downtown Development Committee recommends that the minimum density within this area be 15 units per acre. The Medium Density category limits the density to below 15 units per acre. i i � f � r4. , j il t. `rr - ..":.:'.ti.ak Page 2 3. The property is situated in such a way that a high density development will not adversely affect adjacent property. 4. This is one of the few remaining areas along tars coast that is ideally Suited for higher density development. The parcels are large and with proper site planning and building design they can be an asset to this area. A hig her "density also providen more opportunities for persons to enjoy the coastal resource. S. A specific plan or a more detailed development plan will be, ,prepared for this area. Such a plan can address any concerns that may arise concerning specific development } alternatives. Very truly yours, S. A. Y ERI Vice Presi t FAY f h 1 ' ,f[�„+' ��fift'� k^ }C "'J 7:�� `�t•aYt�•�all.G�h ri"i. f:37 Y+� �.��`:P.`�f'2 J �7a '.�. ¢'L 6 1 1W4`.^..+.,'4ti::.�«��-�(.Y.ryk '�Y�::'`�:iCl'i.�'�,:.R.TI1•w+. s�� 400.11%%m P. 0. 4ox 190 Huntingtc�� '•. 1,C.A 926•IC� ' ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT September 24, 1980 Ms. June Catalano Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Ms. Catalano: SUBJECT: COASTAL ELEtiEHT HUNT'INGTON BEACH GENERAL PW District staff has reviewed the proposed Coastal Element of the Huntington Beach General Plan. While the document as a whole is very thorough and you and your Staff sbould be complimented for this achievement, we do feel that one of the issues - "coastal fa. access" .- has not been adequately addressed. Specifically, we would like to offer the following comments: 0 Chapter 2, Recreation and Shoreline Access: The discussion . in this chapter is epparently limited only to access from the }: nearest public road to coastal resources. We cannot find any discussion concerning the issue of maximizing public access from inland areas to coastal resources (Coastal Act Policy 30252). There was no mention about transit enhancement in thin chapter ' 4 at all. Specific measures or actions to be taken by the City in maximiziug public access and inducing transit, ridership should be included. • Chapter 9, Comunity Facilities: We ire pleasrit to see that the City's coastal policy in fact 3rourages the provision of adequate transit facilities t4, vect protected future demnd." . However, we do have some concerns about the statements made in this chapter. First, the report indicates (page 116) that the City's coastal policy supports one transportation center location to serve both recreation and commuter traffic. Studies h3VC shown, however, that camsuter and recreation trip demands in Huntingtun Beach are beat served by, one freeway-oriented locetiotl anS one ,beach-oriented location. In fcct,. page 109 ol your report also states, "Recreational traffic. ..hao 'different ,Y destination points and peak hours than either local or c6auuter t.,. 11222 ACACIA PAnKwAY• P.O.BOX 3OM• GARDEN GROVE,CALIFORNIA 825542•PHONE 171419714200 •�� �t { � "yE i f IY } ;.l yl� iF.i •M1".�.,t`y.. .'X�f'S?�g � �tl_% ����1� re�i'• T�ii�`.i, iSK"�tYt� �':4eW�1•��:v�.t,.t'1'tFtE_ .t'Il�l��'k'1?'9�� . . �w � � n • Hs. June Catalano September 24, 1980 Page 2 i traffic." It is therefore impossible to provide one facility to satisfy both commuter and recreation trips in Huntington Beach. Secondly, page 116 reads, "The design and location of the transportation center should mitigate any adverse impacts on �. the project site and the immediate surrounding area." Since minimizing negative,impacts is applicable for any project, it appears strange that this document should call this out vpecifically for the transportation center project, especially ' when the City encourages the provision of adequate transit facilities. S While the transportation center may have minor localized impr.cts on the adjacent area, we hope that the City can : recognize the broader purposes the transportation center serves. The center will not only enhance public access to the coastal resources but also would provide, a mitigating measure for environmental impacts of other projects proposed !. a for the downtown/coastal are r It has been indicated to District staff that the proposed transportation center site at Pacific Coast Hiihway and Lake Street may not be acceptable to the City due to other develop- ment potential for that site. It should be recogni«ed, as t pointed out in this report, that Section 30254 of the Coastal t Act states, "Where existing or planned public works facilities t can accommodate only a limited amount of new development, services to 'coastal dependent land use, essential public services and basic induatries vital to the econoeic health of the region, state or nation,. public recreation, commercial recreston and visitor serving land uses shall not be precluded by other development." This policy could be interpreted to mean that the development of the transportation center at the PCH and Lake site cannot be precluded because of other potential uses. Thx City's policy should carefully balance the provision of vital public services with private commercial development. 0 Chapter 10, Coastal Land Use Plan: Since this chapter consti- tutes the City's Coastal Plan, we would like to reiterate the need for a policy emphasizing improved transit access including specific measures and actions to be taken by the City. Policies 16f and 16S could be expanded to describe the City's efforts in making increased transit service possible and attractive through the provision of turnouts, bus stops and zones, parking management, improved bun access and development of A transportation center in the coastal zone. Policy 16h should be restated to incorporate the comments made above on transportation centers. 73�7 �yflF y�t..a.%A,jV'1'•'«.`.'4n,w.n w..s...-�.... ,. .-l-n 1..,,,rw.....1. ♦ .., r..... +.., a.�...Irr...+.....�.....w............. ............... .... ......._..._......_... r... .... � w . M1 t. :y f �..� `'� l(p } 1'.Y' ,, '., �j r t � • �+ 4� ,' fir+ f{ �. .•� �, � � h 4!t.'.,,:{. '� i� .tti '4.; ,', . k•E �.. wit .+ t r �4 � ti •. �. +�1 .t r 4. �.� ,`.�.` � �. 1 ' - ' t •Y� �#.�F'+a T7^ � ;..�.',�� r. ". r.'.� +4 r �. • 7 . mv �a �ri rat , )ti+ t � a�h a 1 +' ,, '} i. �. � , � } + •t r� � r ?`140VY �� + f y,• /1lA}k�yy.�s�]1''�,l} t ti p* .4 i y.'asl IJ t �i 4�O s x.: 1c,�4'r�`, r.r.,l i• Y b+li i� n{ � �tk r+�'( t�,�t'� �'` tk YN`,7y ,)�,'( . . 1 } , G j ,E' J. ,�:'.y 1n►'��.'!+ii f,Y r 4 �I i�q °i�l�'; ` a� �� ra�$ �!,'�,ati`�.i 1� l�� `` ray?:� \ •. .� tA: � `' 1� . R} 1, +"�t �� „'►'1! .}'T . ,.}. y f •1 •i+' o � '+ Y `e� it � � ` � �� its.' 1J.�i Satu'!4d't,-.�'�.ff. 1�wi:13.'itkti'2Sl�2Fa l�Jit;u+ iti11�►t:� .'9 ',?!: 2Y ts1 'il.Y� w �Gf1 `!' i:?:iY1 7.4 .his+ lxkxalti�?. .1'�i ri6a i "k.. i�a Y�P.:arria ` v+x±:,433 {# � v" �a .:tssA+�y i♦ k��'; ;a � n I' �: rsl �. . �' , .�. l 7+.� .1 j� f! 1G �1, .i i �„�`�� �tl r:'y. 3 T�yr, �' `. 4 •a • •.y� v v ; 4 -�o,� .1. �.An >.1+dXi�4.c� 1'a1..i ...�:►,.. r�y'�._ ^.t tl4S't'\.�,...3 5r•� ,._ :5 .1 .w.....l �. ."h.�S'i� � li�1 r.'U '. �'. r, '�. .,r t�.�:Y+�.�s3ki t '4��.-. +�' .�rr1......��. . ,_ .t!i21t� i MOLA DEVELOPMENT COr i;MION/806 AE)AMS AVE.HUNTINGTON UACK CALIF 92648/(:A)536.2547 6994 EL CAMINO REAL SUITE 211 CARLSHAD,CA QXXM IQU)436-IIW V G �CN fSeptember ;9, 1980 HiJi '- iO � PLANMGE • fit•� i � 198U Ms. June W.'.*•Catalano Senior.Plannar p, p, pox 190 City of Huntington Beach kuntington tlaach,CA 926� P.O. Box 190 - •• ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Ms. Catalano: The purpose of this letter is o provide our.,reaction to, the recently published City of Huntington. Beach Coastal Element. After reviewing this document.:,it becomes obvious that you and-your staff are to be ccmpplitmented for a very read- able and, thoughtful study. The City has responded well to the very special opportunity (if not burden) of coalescing the desires and demands of a multi- tude of interests including,.locel and regional, public and private, as well as balancing the objective of the City Fathers with those of the State Coastal Commission. It would .sew to bar a thankless task; however, the net, results of this effort will bo eijayed by •glenerations to come. There is little question thl+t the future image 'of. Huntington Beach will be etched in the LCP. There is an. area of special interest to us all and that involves housing..,.. It is our bellef that Huntington Beach has, the potential to evolve into one of the most, "balanced" and desirable residential co munities in Southern California. Certainly other coastal comunities, especially in Orange County, have become Tipper-class enclaves unapproachable as a place to live and work by the bulk of the.population. It is somewhat surprising that this area has not already traveled the path of Newport and Irvine. In teims of "affordable" housing, we feel that our company has made a major contributicsn in this area and hope to continue with these efforts to attract a diversified buyer profile. 1 hardly need to indicate that of particular concern to Nola Development Corporation is the ultimate disposition of a consolidated block located between 12th and 13th Streets on the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway. This site is located in what the City admits to be a particularly complex and problem- matic area that is "characterized by small parcels and highly dish4rsed owner- ship which has inhibited large-scale.projects." Indeed ms ch of the downtown area is either vacant or grossly underbuilt given its prime location. The subject site, %tich is consolidated, is presently undeveloped pending the LCP. Three alternatives for development of the downtown area have been offered for review by staff. Two of the three alternatives designate the subject property as Visitor-Serving. The third alternative wound permit high-density residential use. With respect to the newl". created Visitor-Serving category. the Coastal Element—indicates-potential uses would include accamodations, food and services - including hotels, motels, campgrounds, restaurants, and comercial- recreation development. The Coastal Element further indicates that there are ev.* ' i i Ms. June W. Catalano September 10, 1980 Page 3 there is `sufficient growth ;in other sectors ,including recreation, support/ commercial. and:other types�,of retail commercial . A great.deal of stimulus .for growth inthe comnmrcial end,is :from an.outfall of demand from new residential development. ., ;It-is ,our..belief,that'the only ways to stimulate growth In the downtown area,?�especielly via natural circumstances, is to;,encourage production. in .W' residential sector. A.sharp increase..in,housing will stimulate ccxnercial/ recreation activity which should ,in-turn stimulate demand>`for,other Visitor-:.Serving facilities... The feasibility of. producing residential housing along the coast is' a given one_ Encouragging the 'private sector to actively, pursue non- . residential devil apnent, espeecially Visitor-Servings will he a very difficult task if'not impossible. without substantial public expense. It should be noted that desired development cannot always be created by mandate atone. In "reaction:to.the'three al ternatives: posed'for,the.dohmtown area,` we favor the third, permitting_'us the, pportWty! to pursue resideritial'las'�opposed toYisitor- 50ving:development. We could read ily„accept any- 'of the alternatives if'.more .latitude of'potential' land usss were.made available.:.. Certainly,' the' heizei : uses":cttegory;offers much more,'flexibi,lity,' especially cortmercial/residential. Stimulating tha:poivate,sector throughoat .the coastal zone Kill require overall. greater flexibility, With.respect ;to ,the"12th to 13th Street.'s1te,, we would hope,,that some`cansideration be given to the fact that'"this. is- one.of the: argest consolidated sites, in `he;.downtoan area and, as a result, development could possibly proceed at a swifter pace.';:; It;seems .our postponement oUplan submittal for this site has°worked 'to our detriment. Themare at least two references in, the Coastal Elment Where.accommodation has been,made for proposed develop- ment - the proposed Countess Drive 'Center. in Huntington Harbor and the Senior Citizens Complex replacipq the old Civic Center site... June, these are some of our own otaservations and inclinations. If:you hIauld be ` interested in any further input. from us. especially in areas involving height limitations or other land use strategies, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly. yours. PIAvon CORPORATION Peens ' General Counsel PEvE:Sk -*i �� Yk"..�y• w:i�•"�•a:::.lftn.•^rw+++•.vw.....a*..+ur+•W;i.i{w:`!9SM1.'Y:-•L:::fX.td'ityp..�6Vcttra►,,.r_...s..u++n.ru•cav+�.•.•..w+«,......«.«....._.�...... -�.. .. V t a UNITED STATES •ulEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National (lavanic and Atmospheric Adnlir.Istration NATION& MARINE Fl3HEMES SERVICE ' Southwest Region 300 South Ferry Street Terminal Island, California 90731 September 9, 1980 F/SWR33:RSH Ii�INTihGTON BEAc.H lso3-12 PLANNING DEFT. City of Huntington Beach SEE if) 1980 Department of Development Service P.O. Box 190 Huntin8ton Beach, CA 92648 P. C?. sax 190 Huntington ":sch,CA 92648 Gentlemen: Subject: Heview of Draft Coastal Element for Local Coastal Program - City of Huntington Bench We commend the City for the recognition of environmentally 'seneitive habitat arena within your boundaries. The City should be aware that Imple— mentation of specific elements of the final local coastal program nay require the acquisition of Federal construction or effluent permits which Ara subject to review b; our Agency. In order to insure that those resources for which we have*a responsibility are fully considered (see enclosure) and that future permitting delays are averted, we would suggest that tha National Marina •Flahgries Service be listed as an agency to be coordinated with under the following local coastal program subcategoriea: f - Water and Marine Resourcen and Diking, Dredging, Filling and Shcreline Structures - Environmentally Sensitive Habitats - Coastal land Use Plan Specific Coments - Page 68, Section 6.1.3 - The National Marine Fisheries Service ahould' bo listed as an agency which reviews Corps of Engineers permits. Hr. Jim Slawson uill'be my staff, contact for future coordination. its army ` be reached at our abova address or telephone (213) 548-2518. Sincerh y yours, Alan W. Ford Regional Director Enclosure Habitat Protection Policy look , a f�tyLT}.. n•."'^•►MST/x7 �,�,,,+..•+�.... �Y""w��iYJsrsxs^.unr+a.:� ... ................+.... ...-�.... ..__�...._......•-.-�.-....�. _.... ._. _. _ ...r..'r..+.'.....w.:*r y'R11;,;"•••i:r+ June 8, 1978 NATIONAL. MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE SOUTHWEST REGION HABITAT PROTECTION POLICY The national Harine Fisheries Service (NHFS) reviews Federally initiated or federally licensed or permitted projects which have,'the potential of altering aquatic environments and thereby impacting the biological resources Which depend upan 'those habitats. The Southwest Region of NHFS will not recommend approval ur authorization of any project or activity that will dairage any existing or potentially restorable habitat of living marine, estuarine, or anadromous resources.. Habitat may include spawning areas, rearing areas, food-producing areas, or other areas necessary for the survival of those organisms. The water-dependence of the proposed activities will be a positive consideration in determining project Approval. Under circumstances in which habitat/resource damages can be compensated; exceptions to the policy may be allowed. The following conditions are required for such exception: 1. The project will incorporato all feasible .modifications and construe tion techniques to eliminate or minimize adverse environmental impacts; 2. An acceptable combination of habitat restoration, enhancement or off site acquisition will be adopted to compensate for adverse environmental impacts that cannot reasonably be eliminated by project modification; and ' 3. post-project habitat value shall be equal to or greater than pre-project habitat value. Deterninatioc of post-project value will be based on the contrib- ution of that habitat to the oupport of commercial and recreational fisheries, fishery resources, certain marine mammals, and/or endangered species. Some of the types of projects and,activities which may• cause damage. to marine, estuarihei , or a"Aromous resources include: dredging, filling, river alterations, . drainage of Wetlands;. discharge of •effluents, as well as certain construction or operational activit•i.es. The activities listed are not intended to be all-inclusive but are .represpntativet of activities which are of concern to LWS. It is in the beat interest of project spansors to contact the appropriate NWS office; any early as possible to determine the Impacts, if any, of each particular project. I For further information contact one of the following offices: National !urine Fisheries Service Hational Marine Fisheries Service Environmental Assessment Branch Environmental Assessment Branch 300 South merry Street, Room 2016 3150 Paradiae Drive Terminal Island, CA 90731 Tiburon, CA 94910 Telephone: 213-548-2518 Telephone: 415-556-0565 National Harine Fisheries Service Environmental Assessment Branch Western Pacific Program Office 2570 Dale Street . Honolulu, 111 96812 Telephone*. 808-946-2181 4 ` Enclosure r J. ,t 1 GITV OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER•OEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION f' +• filly 1 'u �,^ .i• I'R � •r .� .I) i To I.ocal Comstal Pmfp-am Citizen From Vlr,cc'r,L (;. ?'toes 1x,ease: `r Advisory Committee Dir'ectvr, Cbmixinity Services S: l*Xt better fratn Nortttart B. RL-ed, Date Septemlxtr 16, 1980 a Rintinf*t:rn Beach Inn, concerning the Draft Coast Element, 11CP ' 1 tam wrItIng, on ty.}kili' of the Cit;, of }luntAry*•i:an i�cn0i in re:Iwmse to + lie out:,jt:ut corm�irdention. Mr. males se tom] emments mv! nro- ponsaln r;onceri ing trr. forty-rive rter•e pamel of city-owned lutxf on Pacific (:•anot }lipjtwny between tluntlt4Lora Avenue and Wach Boulevard. :%,t'. Rrt 1f -epresents the tenant of 0)e Property and I tam the landlomi's represenLative. tlhe cu rr mt lease on the property provides ror tha oper.atiorr of a hotel, ' n mabile,;xxne T ark nni amo stntion, taxi expirea in arproximr:tely thirty ye:urla. The lease is being litipnted between We city aryl tW ;'.eaertt =� `emu-wit. 'itierefon, there 3s a sub taritirsl /truc;;L•inn a;--, to the am-ation or the- cumvnt tenmicy and or the validity of Mr. Reed"i w;r_st;ions. .,; npltrt el ate Mr. Rced's ob:servatior,n, carteerru; ;rml npJtilonS.ref7irdirij ' the pm-lerty, t'tj;:x►vet', the city I..; rwztirfie<l with tie rxi:stiry; ctanrner- :t' 1 ::1 k .Inl; mJ-xM development znninf on the lttrad, turd doe:: nn contemplsate allowitup, n difrerent use to be tn,�le of the proixrty utx!+:t• t'tx exintirr, Lase.sire. An larxiomiev, the.city s, ppnrt:s the Recrv3tio►t//I:ti ►pom Cromer- dal. do.;Ignat'in:r in the d•rtrt: For tla•.:se roa airs, ti::* rit:v !'sill t to rrrxtc:'::tAnd why the I-m-trot to rant, Mr% rr • ;islmi i.tx� leutsc Illit•tru; the tuinktvpt cy prmedure, 1--m witxg, t1111 well. Ile- 't lmit:atisx; of ti:;Cl3 tallchC'd on tLe property by 10rUe, its tativc:cattri.�, n'lt+:r718tu trues .ai{!h tu-: in no t`rty cont-�t>ated by ttr_ leraue or by ttt! iruxt mu laws prenentl y sit feet it..1 a ne of the pmperty., tlx? ; }„rJlnrtl't: rr, srx�uentative T n�asL tx.�lLeraL r L!„- �:It '' r } y ., ..•.Ir,,ra 'I: , I,f the r•^c:mmeruled lvxl use desip;cation at thin tim. A-1.itrt' t;it•y !'sLnitii:;W-aLc,t• C:t t' At,Lorrr;v 1 ' ��•�j��`�a�'t %7�:,J.n�.'c',—nr:.'•.v,yiwi++r.u.is;�r.ririo�:.:ws-,•a:::,+u!.x;cr.•t..-•r+,r..v,..nor.....«...._...,.......... .....................�...._...r.. . .,..._..�.......,.....,,,,.,,,,,, rSt:ltrr nl C.7lifomia, Edmund G.Bro�, Cxnrnkri Caldornia Coastal Commission 631 Howard Street.4th floor adn Francisco.California 94105 (4151543.6555 Septernber 15, 1980 Mr. Ralph Pisapia U. Ss. Fish ard 'Wildlife Service 24000 Avila Road . Laguna Niguel, CalAfornia 92677 Dear Hr. Pieapia: I am wAti n8 to, requost your caaroents on,the enclosed draft land use plan for the City.of Huntington Beach UP, Specifically, the plan proposal on page 131-132 and the proposed lmmd umo designations for the area between the p.toposed Boloa Chica Street extet:taion and the bottom of the mesa, an.1 the section on Envi- ronmentally Sensitiv© Habitats. As, you know, ,the Commission has identified,wetlands for WP purposes -in the general vicinity Oown.on Exhibit J. .(attached). however, the Comtiiasion noted In the "Preliminary 'Wetlands Determinsticu for the Bolsa Chico Local`Coastal k: Plan (3/11%80) '(p.34) that;discrepancies exittt betwean the Laguna 111guel field offico wetland map " the PortlwW W1 wOU" map. Staff is aware that, vub- sequent field.studles were conducted in area shown in Exhibit J, and we xish ,to know,if your office has codified or will modify its wetland trap to reflect this additional field data. We Would appreciate your corzaents on this as soon as possible, since the draft begins local hearings bofore the City Planning Co=insion on October 7, 1980. If you have questions please contact me. Siucorely, Liz Fuchs 1iCP Coordinator lFllgu cc: Pravean Gupta, South Coast fit I? �, �t3une Catalano, City of Huntington Deach Pl.l�NNI�'G DEPT. V` • SEP 1 h �9f10 P. 0. Box 1.0 Ilurlirtt*�c:r ". �,a.CA 926,18 a/f)�SLLiMaMM.�:M�',^ `1vI..wJ..WVLwl{.`.wVS9MKIN M1i+w:w��- - ��, 1 a` . ... _ ' t r•.�,r T BEST PHOTOGRAP"TC Ita-z.P'RODUC'T'ION P STPLE, DUE To os •i:'1i NDITT AGE AND CO- .- ON OF ORIGINAL '$� III -� ••^ is ry /► �t �`�}'��!ry�■r �a�; r� M�3��1'hr'nit%�l,'�V �'iS*R" if,F t/';!n y. y.rRM Iri! iI� 1 1' gIFMT"�' .-""'F'N��1'�t1 l�(" ,.' � 4• � ('• `��. '.:��S eAwMT/1.1,�MTf'T.'�lffG�IR4M!'J��.A' •r �IV� °J''`• '�1t,r-,R~H �!''� �S t'L( �'$,t(,i� G �i^`t Pit r.lh„4�1��6..i'+.+..'."..p:if��: •? ",+'�y�9„P t �,q�tT�''k_,.., � 1, � e 5 �� ttr�ilt�ir�+}t':�'t' '�(d: •-�.•i; L � �' �t"GH,1*'.*4r.�Zt•�;7R�ki�;,"y�iy.. p�� 2:� , '� 1 F • .� .,,/, � }" � '• � -'�' �•1.�`••`.. � •� �t.� !fit' L r• � � •� 1 �•�NfoonN��n�Rl�' � � r 1 4 • � t ao ' Ali '' » •" pry • �r:..�"..' ,� ; r,. ': 1� ' • ; , ' to,•Y f�•�,7.+(�.i�lf:'f"�y�n;:�I:.i�aAssila..L:.tJ..•-•_aav:I�.uv nt+rsw..c..;.« <..r. .,.. d ......:."w"••W+..I.•�...•.:'••Mi r••..::�i ��:... .1......��- v�•n^.. r t 4 .i..' ... .. •f.nAn•.h`•�hlfi Y4IGf':.%r,�r A Z`,FI'4l•' United States Department of the InteriorV F1511 AN ) �V]�� Ll>; i V1Ci; FQL0G1'0L SDI 24000 Avila Road Laguna Higue) , CA 92677 s October 7, 1980 Ms. Liz Fuchs, UP Coordinator California Coastal Commiasion 631 Howas'd Street San Francisco, California 94105 Re: Draft Land, Uce Plan for the City of Huntington Beach Local Coastal Plan Dear Ms. Fuchs: } This responds .to your September 25, 1980 request to revieu specific section6 of the draft land use plan for the City. of 11untington Beach: the proposed land use designations in areas adjacent to Bolor, Chic* and the section an Environmentally Sensitive habitats, f.+ As indicated in your letter$ minor differences do exist between the Laguna Niguel Field Office and the Portland HWI wetland meppinr, efforts * 'We, Are planning to updAtC the wetland map ew'?t!losed in our May 1979 report on the: Balsa Chico to' reflect more information including subsequent field studies which are not completed. 11ie updating has, therefore. not been accompliphed. A3 soon as it is, we. will forward the Information to the Coastal Co=tnaion. ue do not know uhen the updnta will be completed since we have: not had recent access to the Bolas Chic&. Because: of the finite acreage remaining in the Bolen Chica, a land,uie -plan for the total area should be considered. The artificial political boundaries established by city and county jurisdiction are precluding � . this. . Considerable recidential.devesloptmnt on the Huntington.Beach mesa has &lr iait eady been perLed. While the developments were conditioned to ; mitigate isepacta to the wetlands, .the developments have, nevertheless, . foreclosed planning options. We would prefer that future options not be further limited by piecemeal planning between the city and county... Geverally._ an. inteirim open space designation of the lands within the city's jurladietion may be: more appropriate. An exception to this general recommendation should be the nature eucalyptus groves. They have been given a recreational designation. The groves, however, should be conaldered• environ►aentally sensitive habitats and, as such, should receive a conservation designation. ,`o . :5+1}YJ.•cam•...,,.«."•...»...,,,.+..,,....... .r...«....».,.a.„r♦,.nar►a...5•„.m...,.,a,.rr-..�,...•...n. �. ; iv ip :"��,.mr iseu;..5o Y:-.i •;':..i:.iiA::�'('l.:i♦%5.:...+THavaw•[v+rar... ' •„j • t t ; , t M Y S 1�(, �"t`, + ��'kth"�,:�� i ) t :I;y,��P i��(•;}5°r #t ; n tEa�, t� s.L '�'. •.`}�'�r 1! ;Z'-' Ff p�"' 'r Y a :i. �µ +lr, ;":.i. j}6 ♦.�. iA ♦ A. {r a��•I`:� to }'�*�� ?l k "` d„. 5' { 5 •.t( �' t'r 1'+�tty+SA `•' Yr ,•:�.r "A '.;�.., � r#.` .�.r t : � ,.,�a� }t;�� ,��* . ��,i�t��♦.�� r4�1. .� §::� eff,� ..t.a�.. F P P +}• f ��'".Ir i r„ • t •J.. i �1"Fs.,t. r ,§ 4' tr,: tt,"� �,�i}.y�3`' �r,''�. �1 3° ' i h x.,., {4��,! �.# n�S,Y•,� � �ft�iKr`��+`.�,-j v .Y�,�z. ,}it 1'ri .r �..'��.,. .�:y `�, a� ,�t,�'r�:��� { �•':•+' � K'.' �',tt•"Q,,si �'t.....t. i � AJ.rf�; �t{{}�j •t L )y a .t. :t {, jt �, t• f,P }. � frw.� 't', •C t?,:? t'e -rx�t�+.:' 1rT .) insr ^-s : ,r i"}. .t'�T'r '�` i •GP.t„. T,�) 't:z' ..{ ' it•,{fi{��..!'v': .,(�,' °{f,-ti ,?. ; r'Y.{'F o+gAta Lt'{'i `•i.�r 7.:.� '�''=4i° : t t a At S Y K 7"' 9 t n ♦.K" F t I'� !.fist ` �t�L�..,Y 3�� "t{=ir,; c,F { t �. k ^.( f t.c1. �^rP 1 XF p in t it ,C . •Y. .1;!' 3�i kk'� 'S 1^ rr't .y �-= 2•:�y .iw �',M . •� ,n' :};•2 ;tS1+if .xt1':,>D ..�3r.;�title ix,.�i_ i. ..�d' ��irt.?f x{t ,s,�♦•I S .K;gal t ,�.{3��t r.♦ r��•r� ♦, y�� �p yr• t }i:f'. 1 .f �,h• i.7 k�� .,�A?4 ) j� ,....jj Z t ,.� [•. / y+r r t ,„t 1 '? ..3••. , �f "� �"r. ztP(�t:a'�. .} �x 4;•a. .let I �?� ' r,},r't�}t •t�il':�;1 -t 6 .$�"�l.'t;. .e: fDd 3 �ft'.°i.:Y �w�� .�{; ':i�q;,�+�♦ ;�; v�I ��'t i 'sil 5[.a��p.!�.�+.,1 a( �i.k�5��� '"r r t!�Lw�1�iW �t�tk L;t.i .d�yyY��1p{ �.TiTt44�[��,�. �i Y'4�?7 i f£.�♦^� 4. . C; }{,}7,��'t�^ i.''� ,X^.. .. ,t�;x¢, +, �;.3.+i ! 5 tte S;L`� a 1.i �I iX�tik 3[?{�, .�, u.,lL ,r tq��` ,1t�}:�.�. T ♦ "i �- r f 4�.., h ."..s` Yn ", ?� +�.. rq' �`.�,( Sf ..g rti}r ;i Z ,: jj ti •. Z �'fiq P `7' 4t r �j P j R �. 11 'xt{.i�. '`r ..ee y �S, + 1`' i ! �' t �y4t$� 1" 4 M1y �, F`;'t K r t t 4M1i' � '�,.♦ ,�,, �� t i .�j'' � Pik, t Y rat ur � k'' :x t+ i,•,.r �♦ ti �.�:.psi?* ►'".ttf 4�?;i�+t�, � C� "� �'ffis� :T ."��;�'�' � ''���',�f#°r�:rtr� `�3v r•�ra. �!: h �tt,..• �, L 'r�'�,• 7.' IC"F+�,. .ti� ae�. ,l{:•.t'>F.t. ._�{ t There is also discussion and mips in the city document on the extension of bikeways and roadways into the Bolan Chica. The exact locations of these transportation corridors have not been given I&. detail sufficient to evaluate thel.r impacts, if lit the wetlands or through the eucalyptus grovea. we do not believe they would be consistent with the Coastal Act. The section on Environmentally Sensitive Habitats appears to be 2dequate. If you Nava any questions, please contact Hs. Sharon Lockhart at (714) 831—b270. Sincerely yours, �S r Ralph C. Pisapia Firld Supervisor C f Huutin t n Beach Attn: Ji Px in cct ity o g o ( 1 ) CUFG, Reg. 5, Long Beach, CA (Attu: Suann Ellin) i t I +. ._ . 2 F y 1!�Am + pit.I�,'• .t...`•.," 't _•� .. '. .. . ,•4 - 1' t 4 � t 1DS34�.�GJ����1�'L71�+iii� > .ti. v SC��IIJC31i'44C.QILiY��Fi �Y`Y.'-v�a� 'fl.,9'Mu'ti A,�1 p {�f'�Fa�' } �� �•Z'4.+` �. Ot. �•}\'�-� .�y'a t r � ,�4�;1�"�C•Yp�'C,^fp{�f�ry'`y 1 1 ' i �` �`�'�' —�`j: �w }p 1 � �N„ ,tv ��° .y�:•i �'pl lj. , .l) }. � 1Y � .-�� 4,'� �. ,'.1. 7/ ,f'!.Q ''� ' ,'' �' yy� ��Yr}�'"��}-!.. ��`Y� `'� �{yt t7�9i�,�f1�� �. ,fYl.��' {_�' } � �. '• }'� }�'J'' }.� 't+.C+(�+' �l��,i;��b�;� (t „s�}��`j�,;�i,'�' ', •� ,:� `�;� S ��, :�''r..�:�� fT. '+, ,1•R� 44 1 3 J1':,`�y�..j ��I�•�C, 1 ..�t�f(`,^ t�-. ,�ay '� 2 ..�.' �'y,.��. !, v�.��+ `� t y ,?id".j..�Y:.'tp t 44'+�iyC{t♦f;;5;�5;".� i17r�J:9'> ,���i :4k:t� ._�t•a.frp y�, �� 5{,�;. 1'fwF7 1 t . �tbti': tiro•l�"i1 �irt 4n. }'S"./ w {;i'ft :ti. 71w-1 .1 li A •+14 fl; � .1 ��{;�'� ya i ti a ,1. F „�i. ,f• Fly, ;� �i hrSy�144 (tasW StPyYr 1(tC. [�d * 1 gg S *4 t (tY1 t1`Y;R {F, ep fytri; #ilT} tt i1Y { ! t>?t 7f'Y � 1'Y+ °R`"tit,M S�r�i�,-z�'�` •3.�..(�;� "��'R�{;>. �i�.*;�t{rt7��.' ;r`', ���. 9,�,�C���,�• �t ,��i 3}•ti .�1.C.Sy�•�*�}r• iC 4• �#:' �+,�"�'YijY��i Vl"�� f.,y"t A�iq �p+�f'C��!A• ii- 1�.��3�1S:,r.74t' S+Jf „'7�{�7� �t`( 1 f�i7� �!.,�F � 1r'31 5i7�"++,�+.�,e.,..h .t . ,+. L'''f� t+ `1 .� xY.77 �,•''y•,.: Y 'A /'F - t t �.1 j '! ,i•..N .1. � t•Cy .}�111• yt.�' .` .qwr t •, w `�.�:�� € } 7,,•�1 , ._ t. f'k'S. 'i` '� 1 3(PJ '?; ` •Y N-tr ,'it .k\{ � ,,•�q ,l � � �F� 1 �+ 'An• N h t'• � � Ry� ��. 1 t ���Y' ju,'yY '6 �• 1^5 �� ��• � � 1'�" �r .p A '� �.. "/ 3 f Y ,'I t ;. k � � +,; a • �;5a a�S�tr�;� a • ^II • s y , • • r• y i ♦ \ • i _ ♦ r � • s a • a t4 / r i � ♦ 1 • i • r a • • ♦s a •a 1 t� �ktI k y�;t�1 • r' 4,�, � t•`.����x T Ilh • 04 �t.41.�i #"�It#u�i1, a�j,�*t1� *�•�,j t, i t*lr"1,�t�' k� 4� � } " 1 .�1 ,Sr+��"��'Ft'����' "`� e �,� ti{t�1 G�:fr �,}s�t,1 S\�°11T�� ��l'���'�a���`��•��: 1'Ni�, ��� � �i`�-��i T ��'il �v ���ilt .4!� �' W� � ll 4� � '�y��1,{� t �'�.•� �' 1� ��y� �•j���`�� 7.�k� '�} t. 'Fiat »j� 'L. t� i.�'� '� t � � 1� ���� � "��, 4 li ���}rj�'� xi���1 F'C• rya' 1y4y jR��y�k'r �� !• � ��}w p �`� ' .+t ��iK�I ttt 1�� 'C � S+a!�tlti�,r�li�a ey'1� 1�``.��; ,,r i 1� k k,. ��k �t�.'i�l.� 'n�F J��-P � c t �l 'V >,�:�� t ly i z •t'. � ��, `4 Y�- t `�►� ��.,; � * � <, F ,a�•�� i+c'� ''vL�t�{Q�S�`���tb ��r(( �! �tw ��:� � c � t. ' �i{{,ir, ,� 1},'t!'�a�-�t� �ral� '� ti ll�r ) �"{�`+;1Ar i ��I• ._�, µ ;.• SY•a .�'\,�3� '�,+�• Fy :�M'"t� � � ,5 � �"�,. � '��•• t{ 'i 1t, � ��'"T���. {{{yt `+ y#}� }•'- 11 ti .��'t"14� .1' �1�• i z F;i�:1 t . �r. 1 =x' `LL�'y•. '! _"r1 I-, •il . " r i,1 �•�"�.�� .���1 ;,t':�j�>; \kA�t� �.�R! d •a M,n . . tL 1 ti ♦ � -�•``�hi e� ' -'+ � !<. �v 4 t 1 •a i f 1, SS t # �i ,t r Y �+., t t w ,1,�+ i f t . ;L.t,•t C.kt 4 7 1 5 ( !P, .�^. ;ik„;, yt�,c �S`j { ``�a1F1. ' ,nth 1.a1.F';.t �`�1 r .y ,�"<•� !f \;., 1. .q•-r �ii.'�\y4.•IE s+ t I=,,S i; b,1 �` �l F^ ��L , 4 i 1 9t• 1 1• S 1 y ,.i;.`"y� "�F4 'S, ; .t�T�{�• :i,r S* l Z�. �z:� 'li 1RI,�• * yit•��, �, �t �k.+�5` ��.t'y, '� tf• . c ,� + t t Tl -�.:, ��-;���;t� Ic 'j.1,«�,tt .!�,� }'r 1x y.',�c•�y�"1y'. 1a�.{. t'� 'K.�'1k Yi ^•�,; � F� Sit {a��• � _�•� � ���'l • 'r �� v� i�..� �, �5.. �y ,1; '.�Sl�"'��# t'� t ; \ 1� �'� ti �� �1 E .,, '•, 't„� C ��! ;�ri tit �� d � 'l}�'k 1' ��L •i��, �� y+.� •1�����`, '/yS i) �1 �Y�i��y4 ��Rt��a'����'`�`F1}+y`+5•"� th k� {�k..�6�r��1��'`.. A' 1t5 Y jb It1 j�t. � � �u tw 4 y � ti. tT .Zita Tu,t,�' ,,t,;1 A ?•1"'�"�'rtr+'�4�1,S �' r Y. �F f t +• xr aytj ) � !� '(�j 1 }�Fwf�� '✓Y � � :ti. Y� µ f it � f �p; � � �� 1 � '{. 4{f" t`' ' 'cc+i� `•• ��' i i :��i.��`1 � 4 :jt{ta'`1'l,tr '�� xi `t,�.�tA�'�l���� � A�' ,}} �r .rY ��Il"1, f Y _ o� }t`�'.• Ali 7�,�..^ 1 P 'A,}' IMF .� 4 'f .�� ��f�. y ..� y/q� ♦ tt} x!,tom +�• `�.'.'.�t,� '�j � � i t tl,! p}•7 � �.'S�._ �'':,r •. 1 Y�., i A t '1 , F �. SSi,. Aft �.'*. � � f y t. �To: Coastal planning S,ff, LCP CAC, From: Ltvnnrd Wright 9-8-80 rC and CC, City of Huntington Bench 606 - 15th St,, HB 92648 Sub ea'� : Downtown Land Use Alternatives City Coastal Planniug Stuff has done an outstanding Job analyzing and. preparing the many 'background reports for the Coastal Element, proposing.pplioleft, and creating the draft of the Coastal Element and the Dratt. T.Ao coal Mazorandum (01) dated 8-29-80 cn Land Use altornatly@A� Mealms "O't: the LCP Citizens Advisory Co=itte3e have provided a balainood, itecated and oon$oientitious service for almost two yearn, The coaotal plan ,"propooee three alternatives for the Downtown, ,each of which reflects 'oonsta+l prioritiou. These provide a range of planning options from which the Local community oan choose," (p. 139, Coaetrxl Elooent, City of Huntington Bonoh, August, 1980) . See Figures 1, ,2 and 3. . "Ctnoe an alternstztivo In cthosen end tthe entire plan adopted by City i Council., the document will. be printed with the adopted alternative and will stand as an 'uffioial element of the Gonera►l Plan." (p.. 1, DTM) . jj i; A. i.. . 1 t �tdvAsmd 9..2�,eo, `T,, �. . 1 • •t r k i i �� '� � ` 'fl � �} fir. " i,. l` ��� ,•'i� ' .�� 4`i 1 �j+" ��fi j QU L,L V 4.0 Lt+r J 1.U1 i 4.ut.. y•'U"UV «•• •• Uuwticown LunQ Ude ' ,'table 1. Evaluation o Downtown land Use alterna..,ves. + = 2 points, 0 = I point, - = 0 pointsMIMM"MW ' 1 rim -saw am,140. In Fage Alternative this letter No. Item 1 6 Comm it at r d r�S. :> ...µ „' s .. ;..! 2 7 omie feasibilit 7 AHIiET FEASIBILITY 2.1 7 Consumer demand or marketability ,�,, ,AS + UMMIM 1 coees y + p .. 2.3 11 Building costs p 2.4 13. Cc6 sting regional uses 13 CITY FISCAL CONCERNS 2.5 13 Tax base + a A 13 oat oC providing city services + .. 2.7 14 The economic health of the -entire � Q � community RJR 3.2-4 14 Circulation + ' 15 Parking „{. MP Y 1 sua an aes ,et a impee of Downtown ' on visitors and citizens 4SnPba. ; 6 16 The OJIAMOteg 2tha Rr na GOMM Itli, nea ireg ester s .1 •1 - mould dramatically change he orientation of the area. — -° 6.2 16• , ti-blooic,-area ('walnut by 3rd by I.aka) + want-zoning for homes. 6.3 17 0verpoKering structures + 6.4 17 Conflict of padestrian and vehicular «.. traffic 6.5 17 Pressures for increased densities etc. _*air make it difficult for resident -�- -- • s d • 17 Density pro ems er me, a ur ances a c. + 6.7 17 Aulti-•story exclusion on map when multi-story ordinance was approved. -�• -� .w 6.8 18 necent coast development proposals In Townlot d "� i Point Totals b - • — - JOW'unerical ratings) -nume icall rating,-rates the Low intensit Alternative 1 Psx6in' tJ) much higher than ternat ve �o n s or •k terns ___ __ r_ ,r+r.�r+r�r.•rrMra rr rr++�r..wr. . Revised 2-21-80. 4 r.,..T�4....tSv. �t,•r .il.'... .r...+.r�-.«rr r-.�.......n w..... .«....,.tea...-.,-. +....-.....-...r ....«.......... .....wa....r.......•... ...- �.�_-.. ...-.. .... ._......... ..-... .-.. .. ,1 K ,1 '2D � oil4 ��• 1 � t r1'S. �i' . .. {k ! 1 ♦e a T wa5r . • i i 1 11 • • • • • •: •• -r: vky in.'. t ' y14.��. t�.� ,..• • . ,.., �;� . � �z'1.,rt r, J:w+ •�"•,u:�1, .•trr . "1 t� •��� �y "� • ti it Q31 ' •i . + .� r 4� +� { . 1{(� `. t �. t{ It .A• .�l a ti ! a,;�' {{'1•y'�ri �4 �F+�r`.r� �'�ii ►i°i�5t�:� f� y �,4; t1,«�w •.-•,.��.'I:SA, F. hl���"+"•.�.1,�. x'1��4J `t L���y q Sr • . l 1 ► f a�, �r r ,+.i..ye� 1,� i , ., I�,.,.e' .�.t ;1..7i}'`,ti'4e�,{{ �C���`•'� N•'�i'�('��f"��`sA����;'�•x'����� �}L ' ��� p+•;;�,+,_ h►t�}'�;,.����'�L.��!�i�f7,yJ„�k. -+►rl.i�!•1'!• 1 11 • t • : + L l � r 1 11 S • t • 11 1 • • 1 +l + / 4r•.t Jft ;,'R�r rZT1•, #, 4 •.<'t 4 f f •cY .''k , }r r ; x T" �j AP 1 �v t 1.-hJ..�� rv{ ) 1 �P..�;♦ 'I. .\Y 1 7 •'+, itk /{. P, r,,.f ° i, 7{F4�! ul/• � ,y3,a�l�'f. wTr 1 � � � t'i� 4�•�t � �� '•,4 ,Y�' � t + � ;' • �I, `L�'�l J"v C.A• e'.1��, •� i'i ! * , ! '.,}` ti ..4 v 4 � _ +• r , •. "ir , x t' �{rflt�� i r1s5 +• � � >.� �, I �Y'� , +' 1' 1 i�'�}f. rj + S Ix iL n 4 ♦ , �1a�' '�''�''} .�. ♦ ,y�� A *:... 1 r y. .�.',nrtN.1^.;'Y,, /+ .. �`.';"tr, 5. ti't. .-•i:• f v + e LL:! to LCP Staff etc. . -8-80 -�,- Dorm m Land Use auto,tb.OW,,j l cos+baus+dsry rr.ran rcw feww"PKPOW r� r, •�' jai 'i t�•:T, ' ° i•fr�.a7 P�,j'.:�'. . f S (• Y , �4 !• .R •yi'•'►ih", ,,�1Yrf�Xt •tip'•• ,mil T•,�`'u' N �' f'�a�# , rr'•''i L" Un C.aidrporw =bkft 92ur%tw Alternative 2s ME*t� s40-vtM in designed,to create.Q mo r urban character Mtoe►paruMy3Rrvtac Downtown while orienting corimerolal and , visitor earring uses toward the beach and COWMMIAL �Ft OrriNtyaistsjaoc Pier to capitalize on their tourism, potential (p•3t+.: D7K) ®vtdrur-Sarvinp is a id=ribs p��opvaal slloKing buildings of into 675forles in most parts of the Downtown core per. 3, TH; p. 1459 CE) Tho four-blook area .(bet-�een 3rd, Walnut and � Lake) east o e., v altos-serving commercial. core MRxtr xe ProducOm is designated ;Qrfic eslde,�tial with a height MH limit of approximately 6 stories. (p. 1459 CE) we erg M CcxuaKratbn The first block f'r'onting Paoifio Coast ®h'cmah H hwa between Twenty- trot an Thirteenth USFS Streets and between Tenth and Sixth Streets isM. 1M Ca Mmuft designated. high density residentiale with ©p v�hsarv� building heights of uj2 to three stories. --CO `ZONE BO N CARY Figure ?. Alternative 2. (The map Is from Fig. 10.119 P. 1430 CE) r ` , L :? ,.,,r..r ,l"w:.S+iN: ,aFdF`<W:.+arMi.v.»...«.►....._.... �... .s.aa.. • .... ..ter..•.. •v..a..L•.IiJ t..1.•.r+.w. ....+..n•s ..mow.«.«w.. .....r.... w..'�.�........�. .•. ..�•-.. ... J rS iii PL r s } A LLN to LCP Staff etc. 9-8-80 -5_ DL .,town Land Use. NOTE: Gwwsl Man dvskmtion jmn dLtWV uutsWs thff not+atal tans boundary srs dl mn •r�'�a for rsfsrwwo puryovm ' l:�i ':�, r. •,ti ,•�� ;;t ,...vie;,��t.: .�� .+ .. tit :Rw'*`fit• e`` _ 51��`L ••i��' �.ft L L'1 {7 i• 1... • ' Si f { 1.�ir�y SI'Yl t. 2 f. '+,5.✓l4' �:. I�...s ak7, •:+, .. S r�,h"�►a., oboe ` Alternative .3 s. lsand use C07r* . . its',a' ten8 t plan permitting C] s x bUilding.halghtfi . 0 up to 12 storials Lomas*o s� oonduoive' to a bus news and LlMna!Ai C.�tawt�nwysx , oe . (P• 3.• " Rdrl�srla«wtyxtsi��cc �►leClt�frll�y>15u►�O ' .. . . eliminates. tho -orientation of- co=eroial uses toward plain Street and oreates,, a �r . predominant eoldential residential � �^o is era'stemr the Downtown core area. RM Mod D&Mopn ^d p. 1 , DIM) l�tF�UM , �osr�clrlas>�a.r>�ad ��f'�orVs��aftCam�fcip� ',` tlWhile ths• first blook visitor-serving NSTI • eomzeruiai uoea arm united to.- ttiree stories EUGenwd In height the ffioe- and residential area =Rwomo nodiam would.be allowed a twelvo-stou maximum heighw, which would be steppe c ram (Mca wa canon the beach area, with heights approaching 12 stories near Orange," (p. 18.' D7M) Q�,�t� _ t_..J axe,-�wtlpKul No height limits are apeoified along QA�rxxroConxrxx�tty j Pacific Coast Highway from 6th to C;7Pkrr�inDR>;serv� ; ;oldenwest. —COASTAL ZONE 00UNDARY r.• .r Figure 3. Alternative 3, (The map is from Fig.10.13. p. 1450 a) ?'r rp.-1r `Lrsr- d i�'+`=t.a.+.............•-v-... -..a.......... r...r.car .•. aa:., ...... .,.w.,........ .... ...•.. ..............w-....,... �.-. ......� ..,. .. ,Q i i LLW to LCP Staff etc. eo.%ntown Land Use. -6- 9-8-80 ' I. Communitv attitude Much of the following information is extracted and organized from pp 4-5. MM) The Jan., 1979 special census included the question: What plans do you feel the Ci 7 should pursue in the Downtown area; j 61 % grave definitive responses. Of thove: % Cud. Rea name 54 5 evitalization: restore and upgrade existing commercial urges; upgrade Streets, lighting, utilitiou oto. •13 67 Not pursue revitalization or redevelopment. 12 Redevelopment plan to em size resident al develo ent 10 10 Redevelopment emphasizing tourism t 11 2x Redevolopment plan emphasizing oommereigi development of a regional significance. The rosponaea were poorly formulated for determining intensity ' preferences, Buts F r .!'Opinions of they residents 'of the areas immediately ad3aoent to Downtown did not differ markedly from the pity-aide results.11 (p. 5, DTM) ; ;i Co=e t s Sinoe,'a high.; pei6ent of area residents are' for ,a 2- or. r -story :height'llzit, the Ariference might be' that a high percent of the city realdent�s e►re for a low intensity. ._ - Ohly..211, k tavored.out»-of«'•c+ity-srrving cammerQial: tourism: (10 regional commeraia), (11"o) . Co„-its:: Q. ,jn" 1976 `advocates of. the VTN• plan said we had :to put 20-story , rutldingo 'on DOWritown commeroia►l property because •the .land' was. so valuable When`.asked; why the land .was so Valuable, the reply,. .was' : of what we're going to put on it." too the reasoning ia::"circular. b. Leetion 4 on' ttie4aensus asked: What most closely reflects your .R�r�eefereennce in hour Rg p.,. , :1979 Special Census Results, .dames P ►11n to C y Count 1 and Planning Commission, City of, HB, 5-44-79) Of the ?3$ who gave definitive responses. :'the answers Weres ` '.I 531 An" gle Tgmily homed 5 % apartments '6 condominiums 1 % highor than 3 stories 5 % mobile homes (condominiums and apartments f Thus 22 � Pref er housiba with a hei[tht 1l.mit of '3 stories or' less. r ■ r■ ■.. ■+.r.�r .■rr.■■ a. _50„0 to. 800 'oitizens showed up at the 2.976 public herrings in , ouppar of low-intensity, �Wk . x d. Conolu©ions , We might, assume that the bulk of. community attitude favorB low intensity. .S ��+r���.r.�.IS4•ZSF'c.'b+w+sw.w ... .-.'... �www.....+wwW..+wr.•............w ..,..-...,....w.•.........«.... ...--.^..._... ,.^.. . t I� , r y • t r i i / #•� , �r �i � 2 y LVW to LCP Staff eto. /0�8-80 DowtY'-*n Land Use 2. Economic- feasibil� (Much of the following information xas3 extracted and organized from pp 5-7. DTM) Considerations in designating land uses and intensities in a given area inaludei a. Q rtOt':teas ibilitg Which includes �. QQ i-rr demand or marketability 2• ��bility 3. $µ 34118 oonte . k; :Cps pp. Ing regional iWas b, Cif• fi�oe:1 concerns 1. Ttn2 ts"t,The ` of providing wity services �. They eaonoraio hoalth:of, the •entire community 0. Circulation ' ' y d. arkin e. The'viaiial ssi d- aesthotio im of of Downtown on visitors and c t:izona • ' f. The charaoter of ,the area which the communit desires to estab is and i A n, NAM "ABIBILILI 2:3 Consa:ner 'dsa:sauxd ty or mar4�etabili �ww�..wwrr ryyw�rwrrnwrrrr�i rnYr.rrll r rrx - ":Traditional mu►rket` saiLlysas evaluate the populati©n. base from which a develop:€64t will-'draw its pe.trons and'determthe whether or not the neoeeaary eonnomia oupport exl3ts.11 (p. 6, DTM) • "Consumer demand for .various land use tY pes are typically 2 1 Y aaaesued b & professi nal mar at analysis, a task which is be ond ,the so0a..of this report and of the Coastal Element itself." (p• �� DTM) Comments No` market. potential aitalysis is yet avullable for the, 3 sand i use alternatives,,,. Therefore, to evaluate market potential, we might; use past analyses: Urban' Projects Inc. ;(UPI) (of Beverly Hills) hemorandum Reports i thru 5. 7 17-r75 eto. . Pro�poe d Redevelopment Plan EIR for Huntington.Boach Downtown fledevelopmant Project, City of HB,• July, 1976, a. Upi Sarke't:�potential ens ys iss The UPI market pe,�ential analysis was based ons 1* v a- 10•-20 acre mir i-theme park '(in the Knotts Berry "twor-Disneriand concept?) , This concept is Impract:ical • .. beoanuse oft the number of ouch attraotions nearby ourtalling of tourlem because of the gasoline situation :w . re"jeotion of this ooncept by `the community •?'�. �'� ,' Imo'-+w�t�y?"4%t'iOaY+ITS+.4ww +..-+-.. ...•..,..-..-+..,, «.n .......•....w...... ...-._.. ,..... ,.•... .., aww.+u.►.+. �................... ......,...,�.. r .. i r 1 ' SAW ps etc. Dow"�>wn Land Use . extensive,, , romot icon to get a very high percent of local tourist trade, a high percent of regional tourist trade,. and significant portions of California and out-of-state tourist trade. This extensive tourist and convention center trade is not now realistic (if it aver was) , 3. having substantial convention facilities. This is impract tail since: . without the theme park, other nearby areas have greater attractions. . many convention centers lase money and must be subsi- dized by the taxpayer, . more moderate convention facilities are deoirr°aable (and available?) 4, HuriCiN ' ton Beach' being a destination resort or modified destination resort. This Is Impractical i or reasons stated 5n er am 1 above 0 commercial 5• About the same amount o area (or a little mare) than Is In Altornxativo 1 of the Coastal Element, Conal.unigns For reasons stated above, the msrket' otenti qr the commercial d6fined*1n,=T o Coastal Element in ess an Me market Rote;;tial irefne y SOUPI 47� r ■ ■ irrw market 22 en •ia ane ysis�, ■iww■rr rrrr- , • ■ ■. •rwrrru iY■ .�rrr b. Proposed Redeve' lolsent Plan E R for Downtown fledeve o ant Project, • Cono A = Hi h�rntensit,X IIml Ptah) "The supply of commercial space under this alternative' would far .exceed the space requirements necessary to meet the arwa'ss„market„potential." (p. 62, EXR) . Con , " - ntermediate' -Intens1t (m�►3nly 2-�s�tary but with a 5WRory structure at ke ana Coast Highway) . t 7 allow "The commooial floor area exceeds the requirement necessary to meet the area's market potential, although 114,0 ,is not as exoesss3ivd as in concept A," . Concept-.(,, Behabilitation (Lowy Intensity) "Althl)ugh commercial space exceeds market potential, it's not by su . much as under concepts A and 3." Conalui r'ns Even low intensit lsand use exceeds market sateen■•,o $sinc:.s . Hehsabilitatidn in the 1976 plan exceeded UPI market potential analysis. UPi market potential for the 1976 plan {involving more :Lntenses trade based on sa. theme ;park, destination, resort ' and- substantial convention facilities) exceeds the . market potential pos cible in Alternative i of the 1980 Cosastal, Element. *09 Y i I Y C f !! � � ��Fr 4t ��k't�'}. :.r� � 7f !. � �, *'��' � �� r �j h � ♦ !'..R 4 � ; ~ i�{I�Y1:,t�r \ �3 �:l.•.. r • : • • • i • • 11 •ff lf ' • i 11 S t • • — • • 11: • 2 t fl ♦• • . • • 11 t . . a • : . . . ralf . . s � 1 •tN y • F Y' • •j t.. r S i /1. •! a l 1111,11 wj% o 6, }l ' '�+tt" #! ,-�I 1.�/t►jl�� •n 6 ay ♦!•S 1 ,1 ! •r"' S I.�, t I' �! V ; ! ! + r.�f •I t } ,fir(/ t Y I'!1 J ':JfJ� �. � f.� r �.,1, r �. 1� '7 ` ' } `� ,�f, rr LI.!•, .) 1 + 4 {.! r i.+. .� 1 �i♦L r '� �r � ��. �t, S �• �'„ t , t ' +!; ,\�l * 1` t:n+ !, } r .I �',tr W i s e �r r{,� �. fI. 1.' , ' ,t 4 1 ,{ `j 4 �•. .tr ♦ +}. �4•K +.l t 3♦' �.' ♦ � ~ � .+;. + '•. ! y, sly;. t :t ♦y' 4F, Y. � � :. •� 7 } }y.k {,, � Y A ' }'7��',��?.r l S+ 1,, � : ♦� r } ,t1,wS ,yt 't � � t,l ! t r" * i hl •a � t 1� , � .��� �f y11 '" r �, t i. { �` K : tY . d:l,t.: J.t • ,.way � b '. ♦ t.,'t` �,' ASS. �,s j �, f �� 1 ) .. r., i ? !' �• r !t a Yr 'L fi "'1 y'`+� i � .,�, r,' � fr L t ? .'� F r ♦ ot la.{;yr�:"4 r -� ti y � -.�s�{,r� \, t� ���/�tti. SS•�.r! �]�k � �r, } .: .. 1 7 Z,•♦ ♦ �� `Vil ,; • ' -1 y.M ,(.}�t ; ,'}' 1 ' } 41 ]+'.� }� ,,} } ! ) 1. t r } t r 7 l h � �." " +ti , r f+t.y.144 � � till e,y i � i r.''� �T � -r�. + } R♦f `t'S5 �i♦+,�]j 1 � y�`' t r� t�� 1� i:\1'J..A ' � rM IF �� � '!r\�•, ,�. r, � ti�i S�'. � �h f�'i' .+} ��� r. f•t�r �1 a,s� r�l ';r 'i i tir^}j f. F 7g, 'y � _ t '' I {yMj '1i/r � r. r r. 1. y4 r -♦+ Yr {�•�rr X ky y ��., r+.y \�A '' ♦.,� .yr, a t R,�}r 4t'. ,,,,71 '+ Jn.. .,, ! C.} 1 .}♦ -rrf .. I}�',Z M a ,,. 1`� 4 F� i \ � 1 �♦�V i4 �+t.\1/'�'R � � �i i r 5•: F } 1 '1 ( S f l( ! ��7{f'.1'M Y I f I y,�� � iF; 3 1 i Y e ( ♦ rt ',•Mr +1 .A} t ��1 �r i i{rrr +7 �f��+' !`� - �,�!`F '1.r >'i � � r 171;f,� .+rl" � t •�}r51t` �Y,t'} "5�4 '� .�` .,� .#t t�� tt t�'� �J� ��r{la�� �t}t� � 'r� 1 , +,+x+. . !4 ' p� R,7 Jt 1, " 1�a < z 't t ) I•�}t� 3 g ♦ ltf ! a , 9 j\. 1` ;���t t.,•. it4) f� v jkk. r4 it� ♦ ��r. r ♦ ��t �ri.l'k � ,. t 1 y:�i�� �t.,t 1't' i4 °��o' S; ��4 rsf `�'� �iY ' , �.ii��`�{,'h����.•'�1, t' y y�f.w , + �r a�}� ++�ll��Ir,��4`►f;��t 1��`���`i�<"t�' '!c ��1��tiL'�' a + } }p�, rt 1 ,• r �Cl SAt ?', k 'tjt �t.�F�'t.t: ,. �, YtFif IF:.111h�, ? 'l,?:� 9h Y .11 r�' .'l*�} I a 'R.}, �'J `.',��t ♦ i ','�. �f•t1't11°3! -�1;�„' +(kt(Y' y 4♦, . y Y+r(a+�.:11 iAt�` '�„r4r��"1': y �'Y''1,�t '� },Y�fr{I i`a:�'.P",�` yj`y i�� t!� �t:;���11'�•Ya',�I,f r,1 .. �1 4tkj,� !�F }J, Y ?yS �' 1,j ♦i �, f11 (� T �/ 1 Iqf r1� •,' �'Y ,�yy. �f' I. � ktt t�,i 1 �yl�l;t:5 ,�l i Y*'{y�`�. w•ya�J, t,~ iL{ }1�1� {"+ l J�i�l j��t'1�i 1�t/r �j« � ! ?tR� '�A1 '1�',�'f 1' rl k a4+• 11" n.J k�; t?' ��.�'`4 � G,�; F�1�.n� t� N y. �+A. IFS i 4�4,.��• ��� r� '" i.=1� 1� }r lt"•"t'i �` r� 1 rt. � t: 1� i� k f�� ♦ t� '1, 7f� �,� ♦�' � t \ V °tti �.•t, tiY r + tl� a ��■ A � � � �1 lt't E, r,: X �.� >� � � �^v {� " �y} L L J `y�i� � Q�j.,♦,', q, ,e• L y. � OZ t r'k' � `l � �. ♦ r, f! sit ti! �' 1� � S ��t• t �t t�.. t�. �#}' t � �, � y♦t ti4+f �{ ^ � t � n i t♦'� 3 S r }�t� t r r r+{ ;. x i + t�i 4+•'1 • }4 ,• � yr} '>. 1t k '� !� �! / :ryultj�a'f Y�'" t \ r . '� r• `�� � }'{"�! � n, , , �. �� f '. \ J iY ,. ,+} .,, � y�(,'r i ] t ♦ \ i � V� �I��+ �tl�,��' �L{i `,."�I �IY`FJt{ , tt.1. 14 jY \ � "■ j l ,}# 1,�'1�y�'}lA 1 i 1pp tY,l,�1 f� lax 1�{+i��1jj},�lAlv'� �t�` r t] �t ���`�' fa'.r{ r �igi�l �+ '� �sl, � '��s �„tttiay�,� c♦ /���41"��'r'��:� a�� f�D • , j`` ''k�lt�:��i�'r' �' ..�!^;�.� 'v .1 r ''� a '' ��I..t �r ? Y� .� t k '�. �l'.'3 .1� < f 1', !`y '; 't7♦'�G. ,-kfl'11•+'.'•. :�'.. ,.'1N+-ifr 4� :1:�:a�Ff ')f ... . 1�^'l. ' 4 '�. '�� 1 + �.��J� �� :rs +� 1��,�,.";: ray: �. ,4:,.y,d•� -i 'k#.1, �� f s �� vf� I�'wi? � ;, � CII. • �n 4 � . ' � ���� .��*�� .�+• 4 ���i,y�����t��`,� .t � 11, ��'�j' 's�#��' w +`� '�t��� ►���"4.'���. � � {a� �' ��'. .� �, f, f�. 'xi'�y `: � • t. t . ♦ 4 � � ,J�t f 1 � . f� {' r 1+ a r�n, ifs' ,v ,,. z .,'�:. t 1 '`• .„ � �� s� . ,j�. i� (�(Y��,�[y' �/•2 1 , 1q- �� ► y,7 .'X,, 'jp�� " rS�i�' r� i � + '�V �1.�. � �' y� -}S 6. •,♦� �$j' f r f+,�{,1 b�4/•'F�' �� j}fiJ iJ t J' Fwi, No1 IF ..711, yL. h' * .!'�1. .{I rTA1 �' `r * I{ 1 ♦ '1 +i .i+ �`1{.`��f 'J, � �i'/ t l�r'Ir {'r 1 x off �ii � • • Y,: • 1 1 1 • / S h • • 11 1 • • i i i - « • — • • • + • r ,�4 • s s a 1 • s . • - • r . 1 r •- i • f • • ♦ • 11111 1 • i • ► • • : 11 • • : Q , yl •; r r • • • : t r : • • • • • • 1 • 2 t F 1 • i F, • : 1 L: • • • u I I : • • • r 11111 :. • G I Y • ♦ ) • •� • • 1 7 k "1 � i r i t u ' • • - � • • F • • h • 11 1 f • 1 i � • 7 • • • w / • t J • i • • • h • 1 ,1 • $IRV,. 1 1 : 'a • • f / • L S • • • /1 11 • • • . N i 3 • • t : • • • • • • • : 1 / i � • r c • •_ f1 v • � •i 1 ♦ i R • i r • , � . . as a • • • • G • • i i • • ' • i a z 4 r i 11 1+f. t �Ih 'i Ff ',. rhr f{ ,•r • t2�vn }'*rlJq 46, �1 1 It Il i t , :. � "•1 i r �''� F�a.,..'n [ ,, 1 •i„. +' }'' 1 i �1. h , .; �( ,', rllf !. 'r, r , r r / ::� {) K` r,.,. ,i l' 1lr* r11.+ r 0.1, (t, y V _ '♦ �fi 1 V r� I�t� , i.: �+ , ` 4 C �5y� w '. r / �1 ' Yj r: 1 11 •'{ ,� ITS 1� } 1 1 It .�i i ��q , r � 3r.�.{ 1 1 ...�li ' 1# A '1 �, Y y �. N t !. i f1 .H .1 a 1,, {'�� .to ��•' F t,�l'1 1 �. � �. r' � 1 /, ; ' f + % �. � Itl �.'ti{ �� 5•'' {,� ��. �~7y..'��l r�'- °' � r', ,6..� ,1.4444 )�. r) i � •� •t,�i� } F f , a�i 1 ) ��.y Y i.�•i1��: ti *'F ��'{ , r',.1�� Syr + �+,t '�! !. -,'�� 1•i...,�YY J J, 1'�}�}`�1 y� r.4'. F� r 4 y-s� V .� t i ♦ r� `•t,:,•�f�'` �+/ ..a..71�•7 '{tj},..�f t 'F: � i 4. � r�iy �,{/�.,•� ,�,.,��•1: y .�l• �1�'�'��• 'F ,.�r.'.: Ir y k +. /� � � 1 ' * +� V � 1 ._, } 1. I !i ry /'1� R.�F },t,1,, •�F. r 1�� l}////�•r�.; ^�+."� 4 / V • , ,,� F• r' � �it 1 , 4, ,f���• ( ��!'� {�ai,tr d ��d 3 ,,. F� �i a 1 i i 4� � '�;�[f1 • ♦ y yam. h ,,+ : .� ? � � >A �;1 � � V `r ' Ir IJ i .} ` t,`�*�Ir� 1'�,�I�t" i. ' ii�r '� y1��"'�;.Y"„ . ��� �� , 7• „�� , i i � � , i 1I,�};;� by r4 y .. `� �� 1 {0. ' � �:� i 1 y jp �f 1 , Y .t ! 1t 1 •, '.. 1 ..! • 1{ 1'b} f`( V ;19 th ! 4 f r ,,, r 1 t.� a ,(,•�^1 }t'+4 tS'I f"o r S• ,t � f� �l E �.�•y iI&'+'. {Ih 1 t �'� �ili rl y.' 1 i'' kl t�Q s {,1 �•� 1 M"1. t 'y �� u� +. s t ,i:� 1 t, .'t'';1 r +,`•� 1 1�' F � �,f ,yat�'+ � �' f *�,+ VIC h�ytk� }I' ,�. 1 •:'�`., � � 7"Sk1 { C ►��� �,��^ bt T?�,L �li't.�� ,`�'{� l S1 ,�• ,.x $ ,�k lya1{ yF t4 tOywt �r1J� ttit y � ) �y ry' q7+ 14� � ��{ - t . A �' y �il rr v" 1if �� F�*�:0.•4 4 •: /� � y T titi � • i„ M4r Y.i.lSti,,{4 ) � 1 ` t ft .r. , .'s Xt+° 4'J, { t • �,}.1,, i + r + t"•>7 ' �y1 i iF y.Sj''E�y1«♦ �' 1 ,! r r a•r 'kt s' I ., t Ii f 1 4?,�i, f up p ;. ��i�rSj 1 �ti �. �1� . , 1 14 yy� .41 1+ r i fir,ti �`II l� ♦ y .. : �t1M°• 1 $ J 6'' t ii11 (t „ 71.1, . ri " 4 �}j) �4�A I' -f• l ,�f'1 / ♦ r�l, ,y t!, .r+r'. 1 1 A y{ 4444��`... y M F � ,� Y }. I',t , T ',�Y.• f;�,+13r�i1 � �S 1 MMM ��y�� �J` .1 ' ,�, .��I+y 41����X fi�!"��C y�•�r. 1+ >+ F r 4t,t' 1 '4' , #r i � 1.l.;: . 4 + 4i• MP '1�," r �, ?�f 1 C 1��-�- 1♦t t�r rt•, ? �ay,4t � . `v�, ,.a � `' ylj > t-�r5� r '�r'^"r�l#���{t;t�.i��" t� t f ,. 1 14Yk *i DIY l�. �u 1 � t's4' :4t r' �J (ii r fl'R -�►: t���f Ft \�:-{A �!1 i y(� { f �fl i �9 F t♦ � ��, S t I a + e�,} F '>f L '� : , i�yi7 r ,�'''yppp 1,{a1 .�''tf� r� F. �.�'Slry� 1i :± 1rt/•, y ;tk't 'f� ♦�wJ. � }r ,.GI:�"� kl 'tj,'.:T.y i y�,�,{S{» ti'{(��`SSSr ,'v1.#� �,t-i�1�1 V!',!h� '� ��f 1� �T p t.Y, � ?� Illfi �t{511,�.1 y i,�i.. ."��r�''{�1;f�rlii�V"'1r�yw itf.^'� 'M'.,�IF +? 1,''"•i,/ 21� .• •C. • iy..,�.fi'a� ..�. ci`'.•'1 ,1 ` y,r •��1, •• T4 .,{.t.4f. .i .Y.K� �,t`/.4 y�K ./ 1'• RJ' •'+ ' ��� �� !� •4„r.R� t,�' ��'F" "� r� � (��rjX���1� � ��t�r�i�� � �� � i�i Y,��l;`t t�rM� l� ��r' � �i �NS r at 1 �{!f„V {� •,1,� '^Sh •y x�' ��(y, 1• � it ���,t r�'. � , ' yr, � •` t ' ! i.;•�' . ,;. 1 i al '� • h a •''. 'T, r _, 3.1!'Lha �• T� t � r �fy}jw Y � �y t . r is 4.• k .4t��3Y hh✓ ♦ "Z T. s C Y lT*� i � a, •,r �, i1 �� � Jr}l,r 'i 1 t� v t •y Via. , M, t � 1 !�' A ` � .9 r 3 ,{ � fir, •h�l { r ����� � .'• � •� , '� �. � 1 „ � ,. { � r �>i ,'��« •vr +y,• n i a *t(] 4 �T/:r k , � � Z � "r• '. ,} j + '1 � } `�a �{'A . y, {•, L�. 4 i'L I�tii V'A 1. I r q }{,l�{�' '�• 9 ,ir' r r s ^LSy� • • L U t •• - t 3 J�t • • • L t r • • - I ♦u • F • ��', 1 t • i - a 1 r • 4 .. • 11 • S 1 • •11 i 3 i rr ► • • • 2 • i .. 7 1 • • • • / • i • • • t - t • • I • • f � • I1= L i t1 • • • �i��,• • 11 • • VAL ! • .M�a' 7 • 1 i • i 7 • • •♦ i • • • • • t i • • t •t C • • • • • 11 • � • • 1 11 • i • sill • • t r • i : / 11 • i • • • • r1 • : • • • o u c • i r i • i i • • • • / I [ a C C • ••u i • ♦ •• t A A • • � • 1 . i • 4 3 • S i 3 ♦ i • t • •H S i i i t • � f 1 r P A 1 f .i L J v' l "ir+ .1 'yr• .'�! a� n r , '.0 •r •i 4 � a,.1. t -'�. .q. •7 1 .,t t• 1� mr y� 5°ttir- Yr '�� 1 v.r•, �. Q Y i 3(•� x 1.�11,.. ,T 'o• ,r^i .•at y �.7 i 7 ' . t. �ya7M 4 f a. n� ,1's .7 ` S • :� '♦ �.1 ti r :.�' P.y, � gr",a• ^�Tr kr `.1� )'�' .'1 . ,14 y Y - 'z • , "'"�,. f1 .. . i•t>. r♦Fn! + 1. • , , tv. i 7 •} 1; 1 � 1 s 3,�•y i ,� ! '' PL1 1, �;' ,r Ilt t"�5�1 r .n , � •) cb � � ^,.;e Y :r w , �r. { Irr1 `} 1 {.• 1 a t7� ti. l a , br, r t , ` r `>it ty .1 i r ""t , #lS t'a y •t ,� '� ,v r. , � 11"�: t' ., 1, '', if� 4t'. � •q k 'V< �+, � l y♦ 1� • �*. l tl \.•a�a) 1.1 L � i.1 n,�� ; It T ' 1•' ' ;. .• 1 n. y ".! � r,. ,il •4+� 1.7 , ,�. � 4 y' 1' ♦, '„ t ,�/ 1A , ./,n tY'`�f�i 1` .I 1.: =;a '' l „5 i..'l�J 1 ,'' i.AID 7 1-a iL� �•,` ,3 ty �rl } � i+1 � •'S'��. �• l 1 r Ir J ��t 1 � - •. 1 1 f i '. ti �41 "YI i""'Sy♦ ♦� 4�i F.i. . �K L 1K}k� as "+'}� �♦ t5` r,l 1, :•'��' ��. �' i =� ����s� %I 1� �C� el ��• iysRti �•'1'j4P r'r ' 1 r � ,r �y e .}•:' i . } y � , Y r �3•�T1 }� G' �i�{�.5�4>, �.'�♦y1rY��rh'�t, y �"•13 Sl�y� ; � ,i•i v. r ,i � 1 t ` � � ti{S}. �;!t H �t , . .,,.�� F1 ,• `T 1S ,7,, N'.r � k' �, + � • F' � �3 r }� •'.1 •�k '� ,3 � 3.�:i, 1r A uE r♦i �: �, , �Mt�1 �k t � F Jt,a 1n � L:: y tr i I raln'1� K n L•}L f. ,Irk S , 1 3 ,,>. Y ,.1 r�dy � !• A"1 1i�.M ♦ . ;r+'4 I r 1 +4 r ��S�r ��� * ,�.� 21t, a r il.µ'k{t ,�' yy:►.lff<a�1/ >1' �� var; r � i�',rw {� y.�t ,,11} i�+,•,! ""7 �:,a Is>4 y�' n ,/j,�r '_� � t S �. � ,,.�" -11 .'t..l, r•. S4 1 •{, �1 1�j1.. 3) rS • } '���, 1 1 �7���i.'�. 'r�34• {a ;iN vtf xri�,i i! �i'�l f • 'i��y 4 ,, 1 C �` F�;rt,} N, v ► .1 4� .1 k �.T >+'� �+'��,1 hfr r„ � '� �� �11�1 `�,�5 �+�� i�l'�' �•' d "7 I 7 �1' 1 h- 1 l •. itl yy��rr � R � r '1 KiM.t�l ki i-7•/� 4�1=.;�1 . 1 i�., � �„I to •, v 1 l'..� rt,I '�y t 1 . , � -f a�.��; } 1 r ir1 y:r � �' ♦+r:,rrf( 1 SI} �1,.yt r �.7�` 1,144 r., ���,�; 1•, .'; a 1 �� +••" s 1 w�,.,,, � lr 3 •�' 34*"�u �� '�ati e l k f'; .,^^,k 1 � ,1 �� a+,L1, ,+ ��' +��� �1�{+��/�`. �..�5'i.'y�ltr �X;7 i, 1� �tk;���,�'� + � � }�•n f��1"I`.{'•!'���'Sy�{3+�1,,+:;'�y t ��t,Myy`'lh,rt'��'rA• Y«�� , ,Z,y�'�}�I,y,� �,y�r'�,.��,I �q �"�f 1,,»."{t�'S�tvit �yy '�Ilt L.`�,a,• ,.t..�,rl l.,CC�f 1 +lt h r 5,!'!r�r�.,,, � �ti�* !�,' e"{+„tllt tr.�-..y.,t LAG i y �3.,ti�A� r t�Np+�.• NI f aY r ri'y r'j t'�'�a '�•,' y,' �•{, �, ,, .i�' ,. `� 7111 ~Lf i.,� t! `ry s,,,;�1}' t �! ♦'4i7 „{{ �,1� ,�,i.,r ♦+V �"�` 1 )/1 �{y r �i�r ' ( ;i/F ra �i� p,�y f1r1 fFz�i`'Slt`kSty {t. �tt{.a� !� r -#';'i"tY". ;• a� N ;. T'�1 �• y iiS�r•11:Jyb j�' 14;V��•3]y''1 5 4• k' t �t t i rl 1 * ^ r 7 �(f � �'r<# .��, 1 b• ft S'�f p 1`f' Sra.•+,2 ��e; ! tr'��j iA. f .. ._,y ~.{l i• j .� �s I�I�I�Q� �M1,'� w1 F ►+r+S �'yy �I �i11 `�.��r ..R' U T i• t r. ,•, /.,( +�h +*�3 7 � \ ate � �.a, ;„1,1,y..+t.\ tl' +i��r 'r i't ice} •i t 1 .j/ + ,ay� n�>,�,1,,y '�iai/. S 1.�jt•+. yl x*��16(1'L,ti [b1 y4,�+t•y � � 4,'�r�.n r,4 f' Y'.,v "�1"1�1-5.y;_,. 1,/ ty irr+4 i�� .�1'r•�' .,'i�'Y •11� VI,'3 K+} .;;..- } :.K a»1',1 L: k� ,nN.� ��_J tr• it� 4 } r'j.�!"t ►�:,+ ,y tiro a�C�� i:,h 11"1 � w 1. �''�,, �".�,11��La � / it� �V , r F ,tt' � �1.,,1 1 .1 4G 1 A' � 1 1 t �i� 'tip a� ey 1,i�,� t ��ii h�• >,:144�� , 7�7 4 b� . Fr �t1, �• �iti ..:, r ye ,�4t , ��� ��� 'r [ r x�v �4i5 Y`�({Yw �, +y f'•1,ti7 1�,,+/� �•��Y.3•l�y.,,`tlat a i'�..y�.}»�} 9r���r + �, �,. {.,�l�w�,�'�.1�t1.',�,/IS Jk. .l�, fi o- r!''�� i•f r r�?.,'� '�`,..7, ti,�,r,-5"t aid r r, 3 '! ;'?�r r•� 'li 1' ♦ 7:•.•�"< •s k•, t,t. '.• ,,�, T i Iy, vA: �. .-F�1.� ,x Xt'i,�,., ••1,. '•S »•irr .r,' .1,..�"11' i, .1 1't ♦ �.� � J � � !i' f. it',; � .l+t. Sj `"F.Twj +,♦err$ r4. ;• y � ♦r ,�. `t]� rj � � �rw ri +•t''�rOW1, .+•.� :ti� � .�� �' �. �: `t^ 1.,�� ,� � * ,� •t � x Lcs��til +g X .�,,�t 5�' ��{fit ' �' 'k J :� � {. � � '�ry� It �A � r r r� 'u 1♦ �yy,P � � � t t ,4w ii��."t:'1 �. � � + t > .•tl• rr. .'7 i,•.� tL. '� i � " .1 t t .�3 Al t1 • a • Z w/ i♦ • • s i + • • PU I• . • . • : �•S; i 11..1' • 1 � 2 � • • J J14, lot • i 11/,1 . • /, i t • • UAW • • . r • . • ♦ : • • f .: t • 11 • • i f • ♦ s l • • i • • i. • • f ' ° • •} a s t i • • • • t ♦ L f • • J ►• . ♦ : L • • r 1. r • G' • r L • ; to • • • i s • • � • i • I • ,, rt i ! r • J t J+t s r r 1 .2' M. ,1 , 5 . 4 �L. rl, i([ �1. a' w> r G Y :h ",�. � �t,f+ r k.1 'Y J r i;.i y�i?�?ci yli °5t 4� 1.'` .,. .' �•M1['1Fy'� '+ � 7 ��' J, ,,. .1 .�l 1 t r+.':+� e' ;�� +- .:rx<�, � ': , �4° , � .'% J �.. J 1 ', y PYt ��} `,r ," f:e ;�rhl •r( '� � �'ti) , ;�.,yt.; +Jr \ '.r5 �1,.+ •4 1 f �? )y, f ,a � F�f�.r � i 4 +.1 f r:. �t •f ` �'tyr l'�,tf♦ }r � .;,y t.'�i=1G��rf lt,!i7x� 1 r ,].r c ti 5 . f r 1 r' r G ti • y .. t,13 r �, • ti i�'{+. {, ': '4+ .{.A t ,1.", M ,1 t t , u .+•1 r,■ � [[lr t '!•s + �1� t,•1 r�•'�if�� `�i � v t lr.;� d' ��.ir Ji � 1 � ,Jr °y MI,�, r+n 1"1 d r :LI'I ' ' {.E 1 1 � ,r, ft � 1 rwrl •4 I� ,� 4 ' f ' i , nl i � t+..1.�, �; M +♦'. '+r }++MN ,r}• f `r +x.J � a ,,.� 7�E_t�t�t�+ i�Y k r,t �.•1_ e � �.+ ,; 1 I r v 6 ��� r , "�� }r41 t f� � t •., J r „�. � n f 4 '. r.t ` •: Q r ,.c t� lh; y 1d��7�S7�'�{lid"�� r y }' iyr' ��4 'Th+ J� � i :, ..7 s.. h .,t ...e •I it t,r w� ,. .;I,rl yA�..* ,: ti ', :nf `, � M f?��{ rfrl 11 r 1 i. � y ( f�' 4 J +_• i, ♦ h r.i.• •'y�':i �1M �� � � � k � µ'j+. ,t♦# 7t1�1 ��♦ �'.f a r �•Ir,✓rti ,4 ; �., :' �.. '1J ,� ti ki 4 � d ,^.ra r �•< 1 „ + �.. ;j �+ y''ftt 1 ` r ` f.\�rf^ in t + S .• r ',! , � tt,P� d ♦ S4 rJ ,f I ri. i t4.. i.' t; •' , +'. , b • r+ rr ;# Ja +1 y �rrl t P t., } , fi,.- f •_ V.>. f ' r r � .n r i. �I,t" ,�.. f, fi*t,.- w a � �5,• , 1 t J +�!tr � 4 15. -r JL,,1 2 r t a \\ 4 •'' � -, ' t ,. � 1,1�.,+ 5. 'l� � T a { 5 � �V � AT r +.-' �"^lv r r�1,r � �r �Yf '• r r� •' • }' '� 1 � M 1 r� ��� �.114,+f r 1 ,1 � ♦ 1� s'4}�1��.,�4�1� i�t%„ .i" f •I J F it, 14 f' 1 '� a� .' ', 4 � s'�¢ �� , ,.`r 1,�1 r I�r '. �}. ty ti L 4 a 1 a �. ?•r i t t + : 1t� t + t.w (SrA+.trr.• t k" t f y ?,lr �lil�.�OVA 4 yi f'�rycg e �i �eS't+ AcF'. ! r1 ` ,kX ;y ( -n , i�t'c.al,/ l.,A � iirti ♦ t,l, {l !'f1/# 'f�.Y"."Flw ';F• �iIl4f , �'!r r�•. '+� r'>»ki� ��,�+���1"A�}y A tS�:F.7� �' ti +,4�.x {`n�.��t„+� ,tl t ,1r'�'f ;r`���T�Tt �[�GF��•'�}; ` � r�r[�f ? r����. t1h+1 � <lr •v •� [, r 11 14 �. � P. � J( t i rr1�5, S�t♦���.'y +.Ir "�'�' 1 ,ni��t " •k li+�t5 '. P y,• J f .Y '1." "i'�♦� !1. c ��Y;'' �♦ i e*�,1w ,k•fit{I x r►,yl k.r.�'1 y+};'tATY r,rr } f 2 +1�.s Y` ,f yf Oft 4 rirl{p,../t{Tj„ �' 7 �l ;r;;l 1 4"• Lr���'if Fa�� - / 4S4 +41 .}♦`, �+1 t�'r frl!�'. y ��ra�'�/r�l +Lt r a/♦' { �r 4j,SyF�'w �;t4f \ it'���.< ��, 0 �4tf* 1,,G � yt,�, •�c ,� i4 ti!kit t+:; .,,,i��i+t . ,`• �i "� �rl� «�rit�+.�ti 3' 1 , , +�4 "� .1, t 1T +tlr ,` +?fit a t�� '!J#X • .. t. f • r 6�r ��fltr j � P•t jr'• 'S '' yr, >� r +/ 1 �, � i �C}�: {,,,, �+`����) � r � �' f+,}•�: t> ,. i• V x �', it � [ v.��1f { ,*+i��}t����n1��.:r �� • lye•���p�It,"+ l� riA t{� �tPi i�ltu' 1 *•, r' ) �1�i L' ��r �Ai»�{�•�+, `��r X 1�•!t 1 j fl �,�S J t 1 l'��, """��r N�fiiFr y,} �f {y+•»+r f(Y'C� F�'�' �`� 'It'df �a �µ ' 'S t•''�'f t� ( 5 t f' `��7 Pt} �y-"Rt� ti4 + dl :b7�! t5�'�t��.♦ '4' 4�'T trIXZ�' elf♦., t M ik.l., "i?,l +nk+ r . ' 1 rflii ]k;� t� �5.v��i1 '`r , '.1 G. ,;]/� }� } 7` (•f rpYt '"} H}. 1t {? � 1 JS �G' J M. .t '1,.'§ , � '� i` �J+'fit t IT.J 4 r�fl1;,r1� y1 `} fM.'`rt`t•}I+�i,''Sk+ +4C,,,h •,+i�{,:�;�,r'C r'r Z�;^��y,� 4'f'r5'•-? -1� •S Rg•�t,1•�t�44�ifc'+�rt"��i 1 i+�`w`4r 7"4':'i�pt �"l� r��,�tlM� ��(�J { ;;.,,�.� i t� ,'t!'G"'t'k,�'r 1 t}�i l�''t 1�r�i11''S!k},i�YC)'�� � �N).r�'� !�'r•!}k,k }.•'�'.i.i � f~r 1 y�. ''� • �f � f. •5 ,4¢:r A�I - � • fr.�T�`f; +tr'.5.1.'. }, 1�f' 'rt y5. � �•}},..l,�k. .,{ •y .1'^ ` 1' 'ir�t tr» ,`. .�tirtr+�`7''ty,�M'1 �. A �t r.y 1 �' ��f � �, t�. +{i 1'' +�'.:LY .f.��'" .mil r�t LfS+' t 'Vrl.r+l.,A t�,.t f".rn.""''��+.J" �bYy-i M 1.ti, n`'94�c1 6 f ..�.1,•J.li!. t✓ti''.f .},.N..V�'t. ,r..}:..r�l'S: i 'St4• ? �:,,,5.!tn k',,n .�linrJ .t.:{'. - 1,% ��^t,f•.11�',t" +� '"..r. ,1. a; .,. 4. .�•y!�, f4";',4. 'r�.,, r ..♦. 7•].0' t 1 Y • }�} ?�` "y+`'�''T. "��+�',i t�4wtl�1! ��'t+�4.�j ��} ,���„1 h:�',,'�r ri.j �� �.�t i�����., "°�.r�V�J',,r�Y� �+�a.�t`3 ���.. �'s '}.i�'�"t A�1�F,r�.�, � t.S J,�[++I �► +'� ,`}t}+�:5d�4T, S ;f`4�:'�.. �;t �''. a�r�'• ,4a,. f,t, �. ,�(; 1., � � w ! t ��G .�, ��+ + i� ;��� "� !^Js'•ti�1 `�1 "��' r; +�ca1'9'�''r�' >•r y a1t'� L,.",�,� ':." {,�," xf� ��«T�T: �.,�`i`�f �•��`,��,. �'��; ,t 5�y�� �fi •.1�' `+. ' ` df,rf'�d#'�5.•t�•�'`��4 f ��' '� � '� '�1'4tf.(���;�>• ,�h•jr �"tj •�:r` � �L�i�r k�,l i.{4� �3 ' t��r (�'f�'� hn hYu.'Vi. �a,'}}w +''� ',•iT +11'\j�� k, s► rl� �'�1 � �' �7�. L`i �t 't{�1itYr� °� ril�rl. , t 1�',•�1t1� `� � �.1f �i{'�,�,,,t� } f+G'i`S �r� t�1•`J".y 1r �, +li tif� "fit t,� ♦ ^��,l l � �j'� � �� ��♦ .�� �r�q��+•. f ���.�t � �'j?, r t ��i�.�!±'J�.'�.���'s1�"��rt�ri•'�' !f�$r�''�� ��•u�:f�•f.'��3s.�tri{��:�;r'� t'�9;.;t��.E._xa .�tl�l���l;iff,+L� �#' 4ii�el�ci�+5 -�lrE�r;���� yi+.`r;LT'�: rt�+i'�'�ar�ts«.+�:l�i���.�rst:' ;�{ �>3`b�i' ' S t � i" � I''ii :��P����f, �Y'�N, � �1• '' {t � i � 8 S"" 1 y ��i � y � "�``� '� ;r �'T1'. {Q y �iGY �i '�.�� ♦ f � r R^ X �� '� �} J� r fir' 2 t j ♦y/r !� �. J 4 • I J. i r • • • •s u • r t • /1 ♦ • L t . / t • n • ♦ • • I MI { r • • i i ♦ ,,• • / ' - 1 r' * � • if • 1 • •.n / L w is • � • ••: • • • v • '• { a • c r t • r • i r • r� d L h 1 • '• 3 . , Y • � t J ►• " / • ♦i ♦ ,1 1 • ♦ •i ; ♦ i i a ♦ • 1 • • y • 44 • • 1 2 a a ♦ • r . • I• t 4). • 1 { . ••s 1 • ./ .. a v • • • l i a i F • N • a • S i 3 • • L a n J • • L i L • . • I I H { • i • � • , . ,i • i i i 1 i r sa J f Ayy •.9 l r r p� 1 �, •t.i �' .t`.I /p f. �►} �, t l��.,�{ �,. i�r�": � .Ri�u'f}:�.• .,1 i•`'•li�' t.�''P' �J'„ F o i, s !1 5,a i~}, i e 1 7'� -1 r •i''1 " 1aG .ft t 1tlVy n ( t 1 1� 4 1 f t•Z,•w t. Y ti, ,,T` , �i- } 7r } tSi., „' `1 {.5. S.y • !1.'I )"I.Ji�L�.\ '- F,. _�t ���sy�.�. .:•R :�� •st�tM 'rl,h� !♦+'�� �AT+r �Mr „J"4 I:��• •J` '1tir,,F � + 4.: , ,,.. � .1, 1z,- J., ai1,.� . , r ,� �•�„• ;,aaw,� ,;a ��,�;��+, , � -++.>> �{:;, � .� + i� s.M r.. T " J'� \ • l ,! t 44-+Sa, i f4a� 4s�" '\ tt'r� ' + \ + r, •1•A \ t 1 1 + t -• ,\ 1�` '.r'a. l.i. 'c'+(5R1(y�t-. ''•�,/.�� 1j1 ,. " - t.' J t ,*1 w 4 1 �r 'i•• I« , e,i•�'id `�,...',f,! i.J . ,\�Ilf a}t �.� � /�^•'t, �'� .`,t -.o i+7�.df .ti, , '�.���t.*., �5r7 , t'+'+��( '4''•! 5�,{��.,•�, � ,�,� lry,•1°;1� t_?V ':t.7,.lft y� a �i +�,.. . 7,a,r�; 't 1 a�i roe(, ys��t •Y i\ 1. X a / i �4. t r .:# +"w,,, P { e t .Y<J; � t , 1 r .� i s "\,'{.' �{i , :1 rL k'� 'T '1a A .J,=i 5 _� J+. ��ISSS'���,'''' d 1'rC •;Ei. `�k i - , y, �.'. \t` �r �. �ai' .•r: 5-r ; ,�; ,.-„ .., y}X �.h.1 - '1-' 1 ti� ...r �h" }�•�1} Yr "J �' " M., �. it r � Y•;'. �,'(' ,. ''� + „. ��i. .�� 5+Y v'.J,l " n `f+'1 rr(:, 1'ltiNa ;, l il t�y, �( + 11 .ir¢:Y•y�'; �'� ki ,4?'\ �{r *�T•,tir� d'it,r, �1�`5 1 j.� y4 {', '>. � 'Vd r,tx� T:, ♦• :A:1 k n.. �+li �1 s �, '���r�+ti" ��r y,�Yi r 4t,$ s t.�, � ,�}t±�,t'� j•V.1+ •� /�41 y 1. r��, •' V C 4 T R' { r � T`:' } �S,i P,` / r"� 4 � t� .`1 - '��t iy� T Xt�{ t�i"4! •+�*t '.�3,4�C\ 1 �� � :1 � , " � a t ,-!1,-i� ,., ,.1, l.,y iiA�4 ti ,. ` )� 4' 'XJ '•4 't'k+t; � •� " 5. ��, .! 'K f•1y� � j•S iR^ .•1 i T1�} � � • 1,�� �;7 r� 1a �� +�y�, � + tat � '��,s4 �ti',+ , .t.. � '� �,� \d 4►r r;e � l, 4 � { 1 ■ y{.r ,!► +# �iti i�«!�,`��1K itl '• a� f�y�y,}}�.��, "�t {4, µt �`L �"+ -�.]j�{ + 1� ,�i Y;`G � , t 1 / 1• , I "eft �,,►J..�,�• 4,�)`;1 ��7 YJ V. 1l '�' I S••r S�wr��♦,♦5 �4 J�jr/ ..'r [j•'r ,1 t '� t I ' 1.J !}1(' 15 / +' ae i �'. jg I ..,�1 1k\ , T. �1' ".Zd+: 1. ,\•_. 7 � -('I'�' f d } {11A,\ Ty7,r.. •��'r 4,, d4 dt'l��F �S. , :r,M* � f�• 4+' �1.»S'w! A`4(�.'�t"� It�,�� 11� f,�,t 4 'ST r 1 i 5,y,t'A ",?''.i,}�',,'.►� +. t �1. y 1� 1 1(. },,py l.' r t.• ,4' S l�j„ t 1}� ,� x liy .1 ' '7 JJ�� 1 � 11 L(LF (� s } �J_•lli`M1r i1rF'�•{#y �' f,. :5♦, Y•. J ��! f': �, 1' 4 l ��, D3rt 3�'t+•'� It,tj a. a •T.s AtS �• , t t t 1'r,tv �ifk s.. 1� t > �4 l t!Y'}.y �fr LA., .r, }} . i ,{ {� 4! .�11 ,a H 7,Yr 7 "f�..}l� �I� F,l * , i. +f Lf 1 t^i ,.Y� � ?t{.•I,lli..r'� ti��{1f�`f'•...�, 'A �4. "4T". 1:.'� 'A eSL.'s,,,,��� t t'�+f� {t a • '�' \ a Y` 11 '�;" `I I �,�f«��T;N '�4X'�y+�: '���f�+l�p�+y {�f14` {� ,} ,{ , �� ri,r, e f .t� #t ';�' , �^ r, x#�`�. 1J+ f'�t.�.F � y�►t? �i ;� t .t� i J?! s°k+� tJr i,{�'• �.1 �\ �{I rt. �. �, r .f, 5' ]�`' l _1 F1,. �.,pS,,�'. r + �.,r,•t v "�a.44! �t� A t '�s u{ii r 4 �. 'r�j�'I 5,1�� t S;y'`7 j� � w 4 + t,�' \%� ••#' �. F hi pw-{r. 1 t(���h � 'F�♦))". , fy{7, 71 '�� [�� ��fl�'a/ Mt r S �,,{{ '� i(, P jr r f'1 "4 A } ,,1 {,�I '�. f {n 1�ry�1'i �A.. ' '�" 7 fi'g1�;•�'J :�- ,r, ,r,i{r, 1��t� hl�•}��.�1.^Y�j,1!��r i1.1 t Yl�'�F i t ��,��{� �� �`{. �,l h(i'`, / ���'��'� 4� f;; � `��!1 +�1:. �, .Y doh �•;I,qtf�.t.� p'Sv 4 Ilr J�'�'y'.'4,� �A1'� � t � t`►� nr�?,T,� ,*��A��{d,. {.T =t�� e''t t '{ F��`�4�,' { '' �,{n��}'4�}��fJ^���r�-�' � #� 1 � 1 '�1 i �. �. i �¢. � rF`as•l' Mt, 4 a. ,� i. t { ► �Z#,. f{,, i,, of t i•� g�1•� � 1 .� t � ��� t 14 t♦ � �'f � *�.\fF�1t� 4�{� "Its ?t'1 � 2 t t ► -; t ,+ t r 1• fit„ �.T �y•� a ry y} C ,,r4�' t_ �(l 'y�t t h c a" j�� ��� 'll:... '�d"� yk Gv' �'�•t ^#t't. ?�3R T''Y' ♦jt�,f / �1 V :t + ' , �,.�jl.«� ,f'k ..,� ��•.` \ q�,x..J�YI��^iT L 11 I<' `�\,�•yML\-jl� i•t ,\vi.�4.,ir`.. �l'.,f' { ���ii t'�+�''�'�I (y��gti 4 k�Jr'f ,))�, Jy.�r f j $�ri, p'/.J r.'l i0'�`f�il7 r i : Ty ft• "1 < `� I )..1,1, ,.}t+► Jy. ,�l\ '1? ? k�`�'\1i"' �, 'yki E.�• t ��R`k''wS\l ri )g 4 f 144 l J,\ + (j��i ` lar �l f(. „�. '/A; T��.I -1. �',. 'd�{.., �� '�7�M,�'1 ,14� ,C MA�J\a({��'�N '11�•'t f' 11 F'.. t F�' i1'��Y� 7t�({' �,! 4 � �� {L,F,a.:! .,`71"y', ..,, �'nf:, ,1.:".": rr,.��„�1.+!'v�,ri�ll♦hl�'J,�1:'S,�. '�r,�t•�.'...'43�.i/t-�r „.t+c•: yl* s3 LCP Staff ete. «84 � 4; W jifntown TAnd Use Conolus3ion: Alternatives 1 may be the most practical, for minimizing coots of city services and for enhancing our tar, babe. :.7 The economic health of the entire eommunit Items that apply hone include: . Itct better to tvive too little rather than too much commercial (080 2.1ov p• 9) . Thia area should not use up markot potential that is better ;sez7ad by other locations (see the third item listed under 2.1re p. 10) . enhancing the tax bases (2.5. P• 13) . the cost of providing city services (2.6, p, 13) ConalMljc.ns On balance, Alternative 1 may be beat here. 3. cC roA ai: a 3.1" he _axisttn rs gnn1ficuant rob-ams -112 a000rModst ng current rs a ics" acintc�wn area, wiltyTF except a congest on on- Paolf lo Coast tin w-&y uAng tho stun or whe;u b ac use io swat internee." (p. 14, D7%) 3.2 "Thhe'abili. of the Downtown arterialsYs to acco=odate substantial raases n t MB .s owever.��I�;a �e ins eaua, e rights-o -way o o +or is roes orange an Hain Street), recent reductions in the widths of Lake street and Atlanta Avenue, and the desire to protect the predominantly residential oharacter of the areas along Bain and Lako Streats,r'(p. 141 DTH) } 3.3 The owntoer irculati on ma not as a constraint � pl-6nnij 't"uture► typga and intensItios of davelolgent ink Downtown arena. "From the preceding discussion, it is apparent that there exist ; q a numbor of problems with the arterial alroulatfion network in the Downtorn area, which are c r cerbated by ttie volmm of beach traffic In the area each .summer. While these problems may not be fully evident given Mating levels and patterns of development, they may act as a constraint on planning future types and intensities of development In the Downtokn area.0 (p. 150 Doi) A of pro3e�d traffic Increase over current Causes of projected traffic Downtown t~raffio Increase 40 increase in general commercial. Alternative 1 72 Tripling of Visitor Serving square footage (p. t.b, DTH) Increased residential densities and il,tern at va 2 ' ' 100 % intensification of cossm,eroial and office usbs (p. 180 D'?t) Predominantly residential with up Al.ternatiro 3 150 A to 12 stories (pp 180 19, DT ) . t LLW to LCP Staff eta. 8-$0 -1 - ,owntown Land Use "The combination of intense development, numerous parking structures, surrounding high density residential areas, and Proximity to ,the beach will create significant circulation Impacts in the Downtown area, especially an Paeifin Coast Highway, Atlanta Avenue. and Lake Street." (p. 19, D7M) "The intenvity that would be attracted to nigh rise in the pier.area would "use circulation problems tl,uat couldn't be solved." (Huth Finley, HB IndGpendent, P. 7. 4-7-80) Traffic circulation problems would be further aggravates for � Alternatives 2 and 3 by not having 2 aain corridors nearby. 3.4 Cona uslo : Circulation problems are. greatest for Alternative j, lestat for alternative 1. " it appears that ono or more multi-level aboveground atrucat turen no be the most efficient way to a000=odate any significant amount of thrae, cis,, or twelve story development an calloirod in the three conceptual alternatives. "Devarml soutnorn Callrornin cities were surveyed to deteraino appMpriate parking standards for downtown areas. In the eities suyveyod, parking requirements for downtown comaaeroial districta ranged from one space per 230 square foot of gross floor area to one space par 1,000 square feet. The City's current requirement of one space per SOO square feet or retail floor space in C3 districts falls In the middle of the range and is t:sed as the basis for determining estimated required parking in each of the thiao alternative intensities. ". The ratio of lot coverage for parking and oommcrcial building area !a the eeze for each alternative. The number of parking levels required ranges front: two levels for the three-story alternative, to four lo".ela for the all-stcx7 alternative and six levels, one-.of which might be underground, for the twelve-story alternative." ( t aoneolidation is required to provide for parking atraotexes. For ernsy"�vea� und 3 this oonsolidtAtlon may be extensive onough i to require the process of MA"41gy'ae�. But ninao rolysi t u _-- sae pa►need, redevelopment is eas economically feasible since loan Tax Increment Funds are available to finance redevelopment, Conclunion: Alternativelhas a distinct advantage. g. Me visua and aesthetic impact of Downtown on vi,sitora„and cittz,ens Strautseape and skyline have ar, Important role in creating the desired imaes and eharactcr of can area. See par. 6, p. .16. M Mviaad 9-21-80 ' LLV to LCP staff etc. 8-$0 -16_ Downt-1-m Land Use 6. The ohsracter of the area wilch the community desires to establish a�n „ms�ln Moat or the folloain.g paragraphs apply to the Downtown corer They aPPly. oaen more ,emphstically to the Tomlot along Coast Highway (6th to Goldeavest) and V: e 4-block residential area bounded by 3rd, Lake ' and Wajnut, Paragraphs 6.5 thru 6.8 apply specifically, to the Townl.ot with 6;5' .�td 6.6 also applying to the 4-blook residential. area and 6.6 apply tally to the senior citizens' venter to be built on the. 41d,''+ ViA center site. 6.1 A I to gzatives 2_end 2 would_drsmatiaal oh_n a the orientation 9r 21 e'ear, s ua Zarea,res ens wouldn't li e. lid" hould X^& Uas Alterhatives Two or Three be edopted, the impactt of,said=rise and .high -rise structures in the coastal ' zone wpuld oonetitute' a significant change in the character of the area." (p.', 47, Coastal Element) i Uea a dv itsRrefer to maintain the character of the area. 500 to ' es ova -up at the 1976 Re-a7rSgs IF oupporE o TowIntensity. The bulk of: yublie input from area residents was for as low height People huva' the right: to a goad quality-of-life and not to havo ' thin ae?opsrdixmd by increasing the Intensity eharaoteria Lien of the area, jMulti-stoat., buildings beet fit Into wide-open areas such as dghion Islan wh ch ie_ some diatanod-from anX reriderjoes, If almost anyone asks himself if he prefers multi-story near his or her homo, the anamor is almost always no, "Apposina high-rise development proposals for the downtown i area near the pier, Mrs. Finlay said 'leas Intenaet development: of restaurants, and shops, similar to Peter's Landing developaent In Sunset Beach, in more desirenble . "Development should be compatible with the open-space atmosphere to address the concerns of the residents 1 ving around �' the area." (HD Independent, p. 7, 4-7-80r ,Ruth Finley Intense uses may be incompatible aiith the senior citizens housing to be built on the old civic enter site. j i 6.2 IIiB 4-B aC OMMO BY Walnut rd and La):e prefers xartinq ' EMS oar a U awn orthe Town o . u. n area is deveslo ed low intensit residential. With Cho e=oeption of a. dootor's office in an apartment r ' b%illdina and a roal torts but all develop ment is residential, � b, a Ri a d en and the poople on 2nd Street an Dec. 12, 12Z9 ' received a: bhanS6 ,or zonIng for khk 2nd Street a oVe Walnut* (F Tha ni ow toning ice Old Town S eo fie Plan District Two nin . • This ellusis hones on7-25 foot lots an up o riplezes on ,,� 5o root lots. LLB to LCP Staff etc. 8-80 -17- Dc''`town Land Use c. A_previous,_petition had unanimous support from property-owners. About 2 years ago Patti Jewett circulated a petition to the effect that: We the undersigned want the zoning .for the property above Walnut and between 3rd and Lake chanr,Pd to H1. Every property-owner that Patti contacted signed the petition, Patti utas able to contact all but 3 property-owners.• d. C2nbluoi2n: Alternative 1 provides for these desires. "Alternatives 2 and 3 do not. 6.3 overpoifarinfL;;etruotures nearby can j2resep problems. These struotures: . may block views and breezes . may cast shadows. on resideneen (p. 116 DTH) . may prosent .problems of reflected glare from extensive glade. penes and of nighti.me illumination (p. 11, DTH) 6.4 CollgentJoLi and conflict of g2dentrian and vehicular traffic. 80X of the bench traffic is from people outside HB (and the number of outside beaoh-users increases each year) (p. 21, Coastal Element) . Thus under Alternative 3, youtd have annual increaees in the high intensity of people using the beach conflicting high intensity of .off ice-prof essional/residential _ W use in the Downtown core and pier areas, 6.5 rearm—es for ins aged densities etc. under Alternatives 2 andrl 3 mayrmQ eTrrToult for resident-owners to ramainl. ' 1 Wrl •rrlWrWr1 rrr.w.—r.rr rr rM err erne 1- Y`rrr.Fwrirllr.�.r.Mi� Multi-story causes pressures toward devo?_oping at increased densities. If someone builds multi-story oommeroial and finds he then can't make a financial go of it, his neat step is to encourage, Increased densities in the surrounding residential areas so as to provide a► larger market for himself, one downtown property-owner said that after we get the VTN concept, we 'll go to work on the To:nlot. Thus therols u concern that multi-story development may be a forerunner of other activities that make it difftoult for resident owners to remain. 6.6 Problems aacomygny increased density, agpeeia._ lly in a beech area. Those problems :noise and disrespect-for-the-rights-of-othorn (see-won p. 10) 0 increased orimn etc. 6.7 Uxalusion on multi-story maJ2 vhk ' tip was developed, we requested a trap than defines the only places multi-story will be allowed, or cons.1dared. Toanlot tray excluded from multi-story consideration. Lownt•own M rr 1 rrrrwr rt core Mao now spec el as allowing Q t -story, although a pgrtion eouth of Main Street was indicated for possible considera- tion. Revised, g-2, 21-80. ;a l 1 7 r1 L141 to LCP Staff etas i 33-80 -18- Down�("*_*' Land Use 6.8 Recent'develo MIat and groRosals show that Altainative 1 is p ct oa along-Coast Hip xM from )t to Go enwes�. a. At an LCP Citiaenn Advisory Committee meeting a property-owner spoke in favor of low intenzity (wants Town Lot Area 2 zoning) . h. A home (with attaohad maid 's quartaro?) was recently built on a 50-toot log; at 116 - 10th Street. a, About a year agt reprenentativP of the owner of a consolidated b1tak yreaented oonoeptual plans for about 30 units in a :%=bar of 2-story condomtniu=. 6.9 tuna. usio : The items in Seotionddefinitely suppo:t Alternative 1 as tJjo preferenoe. ,IIr I `i • ;t ���y�t,}�1. �iI.Y•'}�•y}irtMYNI#wrw.wl r•.-....r r..,. .+..,.eaM}w•.M N..+aY..+'Wre..•a,w. ..•w...n •- ..v. ..w....�....... ....,...►............ _... .. ..... .. .... ..... I '. HUNT10 I i 1 i BEP. I 1 PLANNING VEPr. SFF '1 1ya0 i riiJ;'!1'3 Hoc RrtrE 11 Yvi f:�rc:vvcn Cir. P. 0. Box 190 trinu.t.=:rrr OWC11.CA 42"!0 Huntington ^rz ch,CA 92646 City of Huntinirton Beach September 1, 1960 P.D. BOX 190 Huntington Saache California 92648 Attn: Heribers of Planning Cor-mlesion and City Colmail Subject: Coautal Klement Dear Sirs: have revicuctd the subject matter, prepared by the City of. Huntington Bea.-h. The review indicates that the Alternative R uould be the most profitable option to the cowunity since this area Is complf+x and expensive. The high-rigs blrllding structure guy block the existing buildirRA';this type of Aienmrnana hAd happened other eotmnities, such as Rydondo Beach arad other beach cities. An can be seen, the first blank of Ncific Coast Hiahway in huntington 80.r•h is onvirorxentally vmaund because the duets and flirts from the unpaved ground are dispersed in the atiwa;here, aW land on tho residentlil areas or lard on the ocean water uhero anirfers are on,joyltut their life. Another thins I like to point out is that tho dusts argil Oirto are traffic hazird. It is stroml y reconvAnd that the plsn, no PAtter whatemr will be, i should ba expedit-A. I would apprtiaciate your acceptance of rw reeom%an- " nation. Qr truly yours, thoonit Rhee f ,,�' Irv. August 28, 1980 Local Coastal Program Citizen Advisory Committee Department of Develornment Services City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box '190 Huntington Beach; Califnrnia 52648 RE: Draft Coastal Element, LCP Dear Committee: This letter is written regarding the 45-acre parcel of City-owned land in the Coastai Zone between Huntington Avenue and Beach Boulevard, Inland of Pacific Coast Highway. Currentiy the Huntington Beach Inn and Driftwood Beach Club Nobile: Homo Park and Calf Course occupy this property. The current Goneral Plan designation for the property Is "Commercial : Mixed Develop- ment." This Is compatible with all current uses while also providing some opportuni- tIas for flexibility ir, the future. Our preference I to retain this des i gnat ton 'If possible. In light of the Draft Coastal Element, however. the following comments are presented. The proposed land use designation for our site in the draft document is "Recreational/ Support 'Conmerciai ." We find that this is recormcnded In all three alternative devolopment strategies, aad surprisingly it is the only area in the Coastal zone so designated. We believe that such a designation is not in the be4 intere.,ts of tha City in that it contradicts and precludes specific proposed policies of the Coastal Element. Page 122 states that this deslynation proposes the following: "The City's intent is to encourage recreational uses that are open to the. public and that capitalize on the mild climate and beach location. Including but not ...limited to tennis, golf, swirining and sunbathing facilities and athletic fields. Support facilities such as restaurants and hotels will be encouraged as part cf a coordinated development but will be limited to approximately 30 to 40 percent of the total area of the slte.1' Polldy 5i, (page 154) states, that the City should encourage the provision o; addi- tional restaurants and hotel/motel acconmodations. 11111 PACIrIC COAST HIGHWAY. HUNTINGTON aCACH.CALLFORNIA 02660 • (7141 5294411 E PAGE TWO y Local Coastal Program Citizen Advisory Committee i r August 28, 1980 Policy 15c (page 165) states the need to investigate the feasibility of an expanded grant program for mobile hone: rehabilitation. Policy 15f (page 165) suggests a program be developed to provide for the continuation of affordable housing units. These conflict In the: following ways: 1 . The proposed land use of Recreatiorall5upport Commercial limits the expansion potential of the 1181 by its coverage requirements. 2. For expansion to occur, new commerciai and residential uses are needed on site to carry the hotel and conference center through the non-tourist season. 3. Recreational open space, now cclrrprlstng approximately 20% of the site, 7 would require the demolition or- either mobile home sites or hotel facilities , r if such were to be expanded. 4. Demolition would also be required If any new public recreational facilities were to be constructed since only the small 3-par golf course currently j exists. REVON5E We believe that expanded visitor-related cowercial services best balance the intent t and policies of the Coastal Element. This is particularly important because of the (. existing uses, the unique location of the property, and the potential for a comprehensive development due to the size of the parcel . For expanded visitor services to be feasible, a mixed-use com*rcial designation is required to Support such a hotel-restaurant Investment. This will also require a lesser percentage of land for recreational use and a greater acceptance of a small-scale urban or village development concept. Various alternative concepts also assume appropriate relocation ra�aurrrs have been Identified for tenants in the mobile home park. Policies in the Ove►'lay section of the LCP also speak to this issue. future development considerations, therefore, will have to walgh the trade-off "Advantages of preserving the existing housing resource In perpetuity versus an orderly and equitable change in land use to accommodate expt7ded visitor services. The document also assumes a need for new hotel and tourist services when, In fact, only a limited market currently exists to support established businesses. Bore t accurate surveys of specialty retail and hotel occupancy figures are needed. In our experience, with substantial new capital investment and operational P , p procedures, the ., ..,.x.,....... ._� _ �_. .__.._..... _.. �.. .... __.. . �...... _.�,.t.�. ....•...., . .... .. �. . .___ �. ..�._.. ._ .. r "t s t • 1 r1 , 1 PAGE THREE Local Coastal Program Citizen Advisory Committee August 2B, 1980 Huntington Beach Inn is averaging 70.80Z occupancy this summer, and we expect only 30-40% this winter as has been the history of this property. Far an expanded operation, which Is stated as Policy 5a, new mixed-use development on site is needed to warrant such an investment and carry the project through the weak winter season. RECOMMENDATION We request that this Oarticular 45-acre site be designated in a consistent manner as the adjacent properties on Pacific Coast Highway. This would then becorns "Visitor- Serving Coim ercial." Additionally, an elem4nt of "Office-Residential" on an Inland portion (approximately 15 acres) next to Beach Boulevard will alloer the opportunity to implement a ."village" environment to support the hotel and restaurant uses. A specific site plan revie+r process should be required so that an appropriate balance between uses can be achieved when specific marktt and design studies become available. Your attention and review of our recocrosendatIons are appreciated. If we can be of any further assistance in this regard, please contact me with your request. Sincerely, Borman B. Reed lie R:;SH9 cc,. Mr. Charles Pollyea City Attorney City Manager City Council Menu rs I Y Irr.+ re.j.::idY.:w.YN'..can .a..,r+.«..._._. «.. ....................w..«..«.r. ., ..,s.,ar .-..-........,�....,.........r .. ..�._,.........,.»+r ..r... . •�...w++. w.•rw....e•• . `1, WEstEmOil and Gas Association 721 West Seventh Vrnet,Los Angele3.Callfornla 90011 1213)e27.4M August 22, 1900 HONTINGFON BEACH PLANNING DEPT. AUG 2 51980 F. 0. (lox 190 Mr. James W. Pa l in, Huntington math.CA 9 c64B Director. Department of Development Services City of Huntington Beach P. O.. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Coastal Element Huntington Beach General Plan August 1980 Dear Mr. Palin: I have just finished a careful reading of the Coastal Element which was developed by your department, in conjunct on -wItTi the LCP-Citizens' Advisory Committee. It is a good piece of work and represents a careful balancing of many interests. our industry representative on the Citizens' Advisory Committee, Mr. Roy McClymonds, Aminoil, agrees with this assessment. The purpose of this letter is to extend my thanks to you, June Catalano, Mike Multari and the 16 members of the LCP-Citizens' Advisory Committee, wham I have not had the privilege of meeting. If we can be of further assistance, please contact Mr. MCClymonds or me at your convenience. Thanka again. Ver tr. Wright,ly yours, Y k • Y �w Henr Wr Managar, Lands HWW:gs i 4 �� [t^"nw;T.�:Y,ON•N+x+w.w.a.....+....-..,�......�....._......-....-.»...�. ..:..a....w..r.,..r,'':r•:..,,......xnn..a...,.....»....,.-.. «...a. ..f.n...........'..................._..,...�...+...«....-......•..+..wwa..-anrv.w.«or.ei«•.�.' •tom f - ' .`,• PLAP ., ; ; . OF A0 Lt- »���u.�t►�mo*# E}on 190 (3I'Y t:tltlNt:ll.t.igAiAltlNli',A7'It1N ��"` � . N gtington",3:rtit CA 92A,la '''� 10 .� .) 11i) I'll 11 it FROM n*C2 ; irec for tit' t}eveIn1i'netlt Serviccs C()uSUBJECTg�gt 'g'1;S ONDRAFTCOASTALI:l�!'l�tL•N'!' DATE Atip 0 ' i "4' 1 fol lnwin g comments tilt tite Draft coastal t tit+ti I tl 1 Ike t,a I t C I tic !. 1-.1CHIc:Rt: ! 1.1vc lip. tCo1111itents al . T:hiker operation., outside city. is a Joss of S 's. Also ' conclitsions really linkit , mit lielgt, inerease ail production. 93. 1 . Vacant lots (low and moderato hour:iill-) - Are yott s;tyiIII, it a v.tc.irit lot exists in all established neighborlto � thict yntt wotild duwng;radc7 2.* it .an bill building; is re1uovotl that was low cost housing; because of age must it: oc replaced with saint±? y+g, Sewei• before ally developmt`ttt City - 110 mast have -1cleticla t e r:1r i I i t i es, lttt t. i t" sewt:r i s itnd0r rtlitS i 3'tiC t I a1i doveluillneut ;;lilttild [1c able to proceed - No chicken or aLg: syndrome. Also true with other service:.. r Land Use - Wily 3. 7 137. 11re lie makiiig; areas perniatiritt by sa describing; tilom In the 1,01. We ttl:iy malit to c:hang v ill t'tittire. AIso t railer park Is tttit trnl;tar;iry, ClteA to see Ii-itg;tIt of :t:ty. !; llawntowtt - M3 min. IS". Why limit uxpaiision ctt` Barking; r;icilltles oil the beach? thioli:;t rite ted imbl is view scawtrcl front pier? Completely t' nl�eit" Nt1. !ttt: tit 11lei` a.. t1poll !--pac•v in.1}' not tit- ct-t+ittliui, :111}' reas11i1e 14C arty Ici build t'1'(lilt 1)rIvaIC -;ve( 1)r. i. I+? . 1,131 v1pallsitill. ' Ive voltt ratlit-i o —wivwt - At oat- !tiltiit{ ` we W:itit to 1111g,1-allt` 1,01 1t1 .1 t'tlrnt;ll t:t :l( v hig;himy . alid hure tie oil 1), i t' i t irilit ' t hurt wet l:lull halo i (at . titter c:,it yttll it acc ess wi titlltit i imit. o,r vislial? A clean I i nk fetic:e? ,t 1617. 120. (5) Energy :tilt) i t.,; a t I imv of beet I raus f e r7 Ilomes? 1t12-4 Ilow, t,tn tee encourage of l glrotluct ilia with these comments � 1{ 4: x[--jt^"•^" r*+. 1 :a.•�n:d+t-.r*+r^....+.n............,»r..wr..».-..w,...w.x e'eshTw�•:;Ai6a Re;.C-:ff X'�'.,7.13"a., a r,1i^1d,L:w+..W iRt+,wx'i's+..^iw fJ'�.a-alo..rvw4+c:nx,E'4',;Elat? r.A?'»,sr:1.�.wiK.4-e^J'.ah,�,"r T. �x Y r `r i S. ti 1 t h � k Y r 3 i Y ,I j 4+ It � � r '. � �. .r ' r' • �.',3.I;t 4 ' rS� rr �.�. 1 T.. � .,* r# r .rig 1 r! � � .l.t ro- T •;a '� '.r s � '� , .Ii�•+. t J T 'y . +t 5 �� � t ; } ,�' a w.. �+ } J 1t '' 1 ►� ti t. F }�� � .` �,f kjf r,. � �. 1 .y ��'..4 ♦ +„+.- '�� '�=T' 1.'1+ ti x „� s ��l71 Y x• a '7 1 u �,. fe -t 1, ,1-a ,,2'r y .. y`!� [ � .;� �r `� y a a• ♦ 1r.1 �t -• C r f « t .•it;7rl } y� �� � *� ' r i{ {.4;� r a .!: t Y� :.: w 2' ^'r ti Y `•►ti,fi3• ���+S'r}TF?c�•T' !7 r4� 4 '� Y ai w 1 , L '4:,,�, `t .,r� x`ti�t5. 7; • I r .r '"'_r � � t, x � t r l' � � 1.,� wA� .«'Y'•� uz�a�!,''1 *' �a f''f+`Ott ,� } y,�s r ' �" t`! s. .-1- �¢� t t'� n, x, a � ^w:� �,,, � 4 y 1tS`ashT' �Y E•rr i r tt '��.••�, �j Y��I ��*, t. � T'�r''�fr ' +�"" da►i1 1YQIIIIY '�irZ`!1 '. r`'i'�� V.. r �.1 .. .T"'�++ ti f �•� �/�f r.�Fr+;.1A t!"7�;i..�W +-fir} �:•;'f`h��:t ;'Slr'!`xt.fs.,.t.. f►'��.+'.�j°.., f,.r.9�:!'�L'i+'?max d. r H,:.t:s'- :3�'.,+r:��t°t•�`+�a.���'��'�i 13` -i_r�Ltl.►s�_.i`�y?):,+'I�.'utkrt:Icla'%�����.,�'�t..'"...-..5