Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Downtown Master Plan - Downtown Parking Master Plan - Study
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MONDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1993 5:30 P.M. -Adjourned Regular Meeting, Council Chamber 5:30 P.M. - Council Chamber CALL ADJOURNED REGULAR CITY COUNCEUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COUNCIL/AGENCY ROLL CALL: Robitable, Bain Moulton-Patterson, Winc�heell, Silva,Sull`ivan, Lei zi REVIEW OF DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AND PARKING PLAN T tt from the City Administrator of: MrkQ"2a, � �', i.tQ l; �ic�trl5dsd,, 1. owntown Master Plan,M�k�a- s116"�j / ' Atp 2. Communication from Administration dated October 11, 1993 prepared by the Assistant City Administrator and the Director of Special Projects and 3. Report prepared by IBI Group, consultants. COUNCIL/AGENCY ADJOURNMENT: Monday, October 25, 1993, at 4:30 P.M. in Room B-8, Civic Center, Huntington Beach, California. Council/Agency Agendas and Minutes are available at no crge to the public at the City Clerk's Office and by mail through paid subscription. CONNIE BROCKWAY, CITY CLERK City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street-2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 /44 fly`&' 3 �-�.. Vrro f - f L) 6 — �fi/va No� ILA, & CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Le" INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION 6 HUNTINGTON BEACH Ct•t V+'[ yam TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council -Or 10-11-93 At'q- VIA: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrat FROM: Ray Silver, Assistant City Administratof'`" Mike Adams, Director of Special Proje DATE: October 11, 1993 SUBJECT: Downtown Master Plan Study Session No. 2 On August 30, 1993, the City Council conducted a study session to review the evolution of the downtown planning process. The Huntington Beach downtown area has been the subject of many special plans and studies over the past three decades. The area has a variety of residential, commercial and recreational uses surrounding the downtown core. The potential for development in the downtown is attractive and presents numerous issues for consideration. The city must recognize that market demands will exert certain pressures on development, however, the city should attempt to achieve the optimum potential while at the same time protecting the existing characteristics of the neighborhoods. The purpose of the Downtown Master Plan is to encourage the revitalization of this important area of Huntington Beach. The plan promotes a mix of commercial, residential, and recreational uses which will be able to take advantage of the area's proximity to the ocean. The principal goal of the Downtown Master Plan is to establish a framework for the physical improvements, both public and private, which will create an attractive, unique, vibrant, and viable community that will make people want to live, work, and play in Huntington Beach. In 1986, the city adopted a Downtown Master Plan prepared by 3-D International. The plan was flexible enough to accommodate over one million square feet of commercial activity. Since that time, many changes have taken place in the downtown area. Numerous redevelopment projects have been completed and still others have been - approved but yet to be constructed. In 1988, the city directed staff alter the downtown plan and pursue a "village concept'which would result in a more pedestrian oriented design and reduce the overall intensity of development activity. The "village concept" will allow for flexibility in the ratio of residential to commercial uses while maintaining the integrity of the commercial street frontage. This concept has received a great deal of i public review during the past few years, however, a formal amendment to the Downtown Master Plan has not been acted upon by Council. The meeting of August 30, 1993 spent most of the time discussing the history of downtown planning and development and the proposed amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan. The workshop did not provide Council with an opportunity to discuss the various philosophies associated with the downtown planning process. The purpose of tonight's meeting is to take the time to review some of the past decisions made in the downtown area and to present for discussion some of the philosophies behind the original planning. This direction will hopefully result in clear direction in guiding the amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan. SUMMARY The Council should conclude discussion on the alternative approaches and philosophies related to the Downtown Master Plan. The plan approval and recommended by the Planning Commission attempts to address the changes which have taken place over the past few years. Staff will schedule a public hearing to amend the Downtown Specific Plan including a master plan for parking which reflects the city's current approach for implementation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Presentation Outline 2. Entitlement Outline 3. Downtown Parking Master Plan Review (IBI Group) NOT ATTACHED 1. Legislative draft of Downtown Specific Plan 2. Downtown Parking Master Plan 3. Downtown Design Guideline 4. Downtown Master Plan (3-D International) RS:MA:lp dtmppom ATTACHMENT NO. 1 DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN PRESENTATION OUTLINE OCTOBER 11, 1993 I. INTRODUCTION Mike Uberuaga II. DOWNTOWN AREA (Land Uses) Mike Adams • Downtown (Commercial Core) • Waterfront (Destination Resort) • Townlot (Residential) • Ocean Front (Recreational) III. ADOPTED REGULATIONS • General Plan (Mandatory and Optional Elements) - Land Use - Coastal - Circulation - Growth Management - Housing - Economic Development - Conservation - Urban Design - Open Space - Recreation - Noise - Historical/Cultural - Safety • Coastal Element - Goals Preservation and enhancement of coastal resources. - Policies Maintain and provide adequate coastal access opportunities. Preserve and enhance view opportunities. • Downtown Master Plan (3-D International 1986) - Identifies and locates uses and intensities of activities. - Guideline for development options • Downtown Specific Plan (Zoning Ordinance 1982) - Standards for development (Minimum/Maximum) ' • Downtown Design Guidelines - Establishment of architectural theme - Regulation of project design detail IV. ENTITLEMENTS (See Attachment No.2) • Conditional Use Permit (CUP) • Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) • Development Agreement (DA) • Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) V. PHILOSOPHY • Village Concept - Pedestrian Scaled Architecture • Destination Resort - Visitor Serving Commercial • Affordable Housing -Provide Housing Opportunities for Service Oriented Employees • Seasonal vs. Year Round Commercial - Balance Commercial Activities • Passive vs. Active Recreation or Limited vs. Active Commercial on the Ocean Side of PCH. • Public vs. Private Participation • Public Amenities - Art Center - Public Parking - Public Plaza - Art in Public Places VI. DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN • Retail - 220,000 sq. ft. _ • Restaurant - 100,000 sq. ft. • Office - 100,000 sq. ft. • Misc. - 30,000 sq. ft. Total - 450,000 sq. ft. V J. PARKING MASTER PLAN Alistair Baillie -IBI Group • Shared Parking • Downtown Parking Plan Critque ATTACHMENT NO.2 DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN ENTITLEMENT OUTLINE I. ENTITLEMENTS • The Breakers CUP - 1/83 DDA - 2/83 • Pierside Village CUP - 10/86 DDA - 10/86 Lease - 10/86 CDP - 12/86 CUP - 3/91 • Huntington Bayshore CUP - 11/.86 DDA - 10/87 • Villas del Mar CUP - 3/87 DDA - 12/86 • Town Square CUP - 5/88 OPA - 6/88 • Main Pier Phase I Pierside Pavillion/Pier Colony CUP - 6/88 DDA - 6/88 • Waterftont Hilton CUP - 6/88 DDA - 8/88 DA - 8/88 - • Main Promenade CUP - 10/88 OPA - 12/88 • • Standard Market OPA - 2/89 • Second Block Demonstration Project CUP - 11/89 OPA - 7/89 OPA - 9/89 OPA - 10/89 OPA - 10/89 OPA - 2/90 OPA - 5/90 OPA - 5/90 OPA - 5/90 OPA - 5/90 OPA - 7/90 • Third Block West CUP - 3/91 DDA - 3/91 • Main Pier Phase 2 Abdelmuti CUP - 1/92 OPA - 5/91 • Main Pier Phase 2 Coultrup CUP - 10/92 DDA - 10/92 • Other - Art Center - Post Office Rehabilitation - Surf Museum - Street Scape Improvement -Pier Plaza -Pier Reconstruction . o 00 DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN 4.0.01 Intent and Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide for orderly development and improvement within the Downtown Specific Plan. The plan is established to guide the development of the area which is characterized by its unique location, geographic features, land uses and ownership patterns, and should not be regulated by zoning district standards applicable throughout the city. This specific plan will replace the existing zoning with policies, development standards and descriptive maps specifically designed for the downtown area. The specific plan provides for creativity at the individual project level, and at the same time ensures that developments will ultimately combine to create a cohesive community. Only paragraph 4.0 et seq., "Development Standards", shall be certified as part of the Local Coastal Program. 4.0.02 Downtown Specific Plan Boundary The property described herein is included in the Downtown Specific Plan and shall be subject to policies and development standards set forth in this article.- Precisely, the Downtown Specific Plan includes the real property described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of Lot 22, Block 122 of the Huntington Beach Seventeenth Street Section Tract, as recorded in Book 4, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, State of California; thence northerly 50 feet approximately to a point, said point Downtown Specific Plan -3- (19 3D1 sru sEssio Al l o 11/9 3 y being the intersection of the centerlines of Goldenwest Street and Walnut Avenue; said point also being the true point of beginning; thence southwesterly along the centerline of Goldenwest Street and its prolongation to a*point on the high tide line of the Pacific Ocean; thence southeasterly along said high tide line to a line parallel with and 72.50 feet northwesterly, measured at right angles, from the southwesterly along said high tide line to a line parallel with and 72.50 feet northwesterly, measured at right angles, from the southwesterly prolongation of the centerline of Main Street; thence southwesterly along said line 1,470 feet approximately to a line parallel with heretofore said high tide line; thence southeasterly along said line 145 feet approximately to a line parallel with and 72.50 feet southeasterly, measured at right angles, from said southwesterly prolongation of the centerline of Main Street; thence northeasterly along said line to the heretofore said high tide line to the prolongated survey centerline of Beach Boulevard; thence northerly along said survey centerline of Beach Boulevard 2800 feet approximately to the south line of Tract 9580, as shown on a map recorded in Book 444, page 31, records of Orange County, State of California; thence westerly along said line 1995 feet approximately to the centerline of Huntington Street; thence northerly along said centerline 1320 feet approximately to the centerline of Atlanta Avenue; thence westerly along said centerline 857 feet approximately to the centerline of Lake Street; thence northerly along said centerline 2352 feet approximately to the centerline of Palm Avenue; thence westerly along said centerline 332 feet approximately to the centerline of Sixth Street; thence southwesterly to the centerline of Walnut Avenue; thence northwesterly along said centerline 5547 feet approximately to the true point of beginning. 4.0.03 Organization This section details the development standards for projects in the Specific Plan area. The section includes 1) regulations affecting administration and permitting, 2) general requirements for all projects of a certain size or type, 3) particular requirements for projects within the different Districts and 4) overlays which permit special uses in select areas. 4.0.04 Definitions The following definitions shall apply to the Downtown Specific Plan. Terms not described under this section shall be subject to the definitions contained in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Bolsa Chica State Beach: The area seaward of Pacific Coast Highway extending from the Huntington Beach City Pier northwest to Warner Avenue. The portion of this beach from the pier to Goldenwest Street is within the boundary of the Downtown Specific Plan. Build-to-line: A dimension which specifies where the structure must begin. For example, "build-to-5"', where the structure must extend to five feet of the lot line. Common open space: Any part of a lot or parcel unobstructed from the ground upward, excepting architectural features extending no more than thirty (30) inches from the structure and excluding any area of the site devoted to driveways and other parking areas. Z Downtown Specific Plan -4- (1913D) Director: The Director of the Department of Community Development. C ��, Development: The division of land, the construction, reconstruction, conversion, stucture alteration, relocation or enlargement of any structure. Demolition: The deliberate removal or destruction of the frame or CG►^l� foundation of any portion of a building or structure for the purpose of preparing the site for new construction or other use. Facade: The main face of front of a building. Feasible: Capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social and technological factors. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): A number which indicates how many square feet of structure can be built on a site, expressed as a multiple of the gross building site area. For example, if a site is 5,000 square feet in area and the FAR is 2.0, the square footage of a building cannot exceed 10,000 gross square feet (2 X 5,000). Fronting: Any lot or portion of a lot which abuts an arterial shall be considered to front on that arterial and shall comply with the required front yard setbacks, whether or not the development on that lot actually takes access from the arterial. Full block: A parcel of property bounded on all sides by public streets. Gross site area: The area within the lot lines of a parcel of land before public streets, allwys, easements or other areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use have been deducted. Half block: A parcel of property bounded on all sides by public streets and/or alleys containing at least one—half (1/2) the net area of the full block. C Q Hi fift LU4iN&kit &ifAh(dii/gK6V4ilY Yii#Mif Ud j;(t WYMW&/Itihl,6l ti&§Wddlf6/ih&M&tiilo6itAI6(lih&bWYiigl6f/A/fY2ffM 16Uf61f &MdK rrfi�/df/�/�'� ff�f/�dt/t'bftsJt �g�h�r�'bii/df/t�blcsJiSigh�sft'�'�KI�/bf/t{ f jVfaNd/df/ftob /dadfI N Q,VJ Heigh: See Section 4.2.04. Hotel: A building designed for or occupied as a temporary abiding place which contain guest room units. Net site area: The total horizontal area within the property lines of a parcel of land exclusive of all rights—of—way or easements which physically prohibit the surface use of that portion of the property for other than vehicular ingress and egress. ,3 Downtown Specific Plan —5— (1913D) Private Men space: The area adjacent to a dwelling unit which has direct access in the form of a patio or balcony. Public opens ace: Public open space may include one of the following: open air commercial (open to the street on the first floor, or on at least one side, above the first floor, or open to the sky), patios, plazas, balconies, gardens or view areas accessible to the public. The open space requirement can be met anywhere in the development; however, open space provided _ above the second floor will receive only fifty (50) percent credit toward this requirement. This requirement cannot be met by open areas which are OWsliWdW inaccessible to the public. Recreational Vehicle: A travel trailer, pick-up camper or motorized home �N?.VJ with or without a mode of power and designed for temporary human habitation for travel or recreational purposes. Residual parcel: A legal lot which does not meet the requirements for a building site within the District in which it is located, and where the abutting sites are already developed. Right-of-way (ROW): That portion of property which is dedicated or over which an easement is granted for public streets or alleys. Semi-subterranean parking: Parking structure which is partially recessed into the development site, and which may or may not support additional structures above (e.g. dweIling units, tennis courts, or parking structures). Setback: A stipulated area adjacent to the lot lines which must be kept free of structures over forty-two (42) inches high. Street level: The elevation measured at the centerline of the public street adjacent to the front setback at a point midway between the two side property lines. Suite Hotel: A building designed for or occupied as a temporary abiding place which contain guest rooms and may contain kitchenettes and a separate living room for each unit. Townlot: The area and parcels bounded by Pacific Coast Highway on the southwest, Goldenwest Street on the northwest, Palm Avenue on the north and northeast, and Sixth Street on the east and southeast. Wetland: means lands within the coastal zone which may be covered periodically or permanently with shallow water and include saltwater marshes, freewater marshes, open or closed brackish water marshes, swamps, mudflats and fens. Ultimate right-of-way: The most lateral edge of the area dedicated for street or alley purposes. Downtown Specific Plan -6- (1913D) 4.1 ADMINISTRATION 4.1.01 Approvals Required All development within the Downtown Specific Plan shall be subject to one • or more of the following, as identified in each district: a Conditional Use Permit , and/or the Design Review Board provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. All physical development.shall be required to be reviewed by the Design Review Board prior to processing additional entitlements if required. The Historical Resources Board shall provide recommendations for structures considered to be historically significant. In addition, a Conditional Use Permit shall be required for any residential cooperative subdivision, mixed-use development, or any project which requires a special permit (Section 4.1.02). The Design Review Board, Planning Commission or the City Council shall also consider the following before approving a project: (a) Projects shall be in conformance with the adopted Design Guidelines for the area. (b) Architectural features and general appearance of the proposed development shall enhance the orderly and harmonious development of the area or the community as a whole. (c) Architectural features and complimentary colors shall be incorporated into the design of all exterior surfaces of the buildings in order to create an aesthetically pleasing project. (d) Particular attention shall be given to incorporating signs, including their colors, into the overall design of the entire development in order to achieve uniformity. (e) Vehicular accessways shall be designed with landscaping and building variation to eliminate an alley-like appearance. 4.1.02 Special Permit The Downtown Specific Plan development standards are designed to encourage developments creating an aesthetically pleasing appearance, enhancing the living environment, and facilitating innovative architectural design and adaptation of the development to the unique surrounding environment. i Downtown Specific Plan -7- (1913D) Deviations from the development regulations of this Specific Plan, may be granted at the time of project approval for unique architectural siting or features, including but not limited to parcel size, building height, site coverage, setbacks, open space and landscaping. A special permit may not be granted for deviations from maximum density or parking requirements or deviation for building heights in Districts 1, 2, 4, 10 and 11 or from requirements of the Conservation Overlay. Such deviations shall only be allowed when, in the opinion of the Planning Commission, significantly greater benefits from the project can be provided than would occur if all the minimum requirements were met. Some additional benefits which may make a project eligible for exemptions include: greater open space, greater setbacks, unique or innovative designs, public parking, public open space, and the use of energy conservation or solar technology. The developer may request a Special Permit at the same time as the filing of an application for a Conditional Use Permit and shall be heard concurrently. The Planning Commission may approve the Special Permit in whole or in part upon a finding that*the proposed development, in addition to providing greater benefits as required above, will also: (a) Promote better living environments; (b) Provide better land planning techniques with maximum use of aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, landscaping, site layout and design; (c) Not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of the neighborhood or City in general, nor detrimental or injurious to the value of property or improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general; and (d) Be consistent with objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan in achieving a development adapted to the terrain and compatible with the surrounding environment. (e) Be consistent with the policies of the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan and the California Coastal Act. (f) Comply with State and Federal law. 4.1.03 Coastal Permit Developments within the Downtown Specific Plan area will be subject to the requirements.pertaining to Coastal Development Permits (CDP), in addition to the other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4.1.04 Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this title, or any future amendments or additions hereto, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this title, or any future amendments or additions hereto. The Council hereby declares that it would have adopted these titles and each Downtown Specific Plan -8- (1913D) � 1 sentence, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion or any future amendments or additions thereto, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, portions or any future amendments or additions thereto may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 4.1.05 Appeals Decisions by the Director on non-zoning matters may be appealed to the _ City Administrator; decisions on zoning matters may be appealed to the Planning Commission and City Council. Downtown Specific Plan -9- (1913D) 4.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS The general provisions of this article shall apply to all developments within the Downtown Specific Plan area wherever the size or type of development proposed would make such provisions applicable. All development shall comply with all existing standard plans and specifications and all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance and Municipal Codes. 4.2.01 Permitted Uses. Permitted uses shall be established in each District and shall be required to meet all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. In addition, the following shall apply: (a) All structures incidental and accessory to a permitted principal use or structure may be erected on any parcel containing a main building provided that such structure(s) not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height nor to be closer than ten (10) feet to any other structure on the same parcel and shall conform with all setback requirements of the District. Exception: Parking structures are excluded from this provision. (b) Parcels which,,prior to the effective date of this ordinance, had an oil suffix (0,01) and are identified in Figure 4.14, shall retain such suffix in combination with the new zoning designation "Downtown Specific Plan" (see Section 4.14). (c) Parcels which, prior to the effective date of this ordinance, had a Mobilehome District (MH), shall retain such designation in combination with the new zoning designations in the "Downtown Specific Plan" serving as an overlay, for the effected Districts (see Section 4.16). (d) All nonconforming uses or structures, 0 uses which have been abandoned for more than six (6) months shall be required to meet all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code in each of the following: • Any expansion of floor area greater than ten (10) percent; increase in height; or an increase in the permitted density shall require a conditional use permit and shall be required to comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Deviations to development standards (except parking and density) shall be subject to special permits. Downtown Specific Plan —10— (1913D) • Exception: Any building alteration, rehabilitation or facade improvement which does not exceed ten (10) percent expansion of the existing floor area; does not increase the height; or result in an increase in permitted density. The Design Review Board shall review and approve any proposed exterior modifications. • Any change of use, expansion of use, or change in occupant to _ a use which would require additional off street parking shall provide the required off street parking according to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4.2.02 Minimum Parcel Size. A minimum parcel size shall be established in each District. A waiver of this requirement may be granted by the Director for residual parcels. In addition, the following minimum floor areas shall apply to all residential dwelling units: Minimum Floor Unit Type Area (Sq. Ft.) Bachelor and single 450 One (1) bedroom 650 Two (2) bedrooms 900 Three (3) bedrooms 1100 Four (4) bedrooms 1300 4.2.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum allowable density and/or intensity (Floor Area Ratio) shall be established in each District. 4.2.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum allowable building height shall be established in each District. In addition, the following shall apply: (a) Commercial structures shall have a maximum of fifteen (15) feet for 1 the and first story ten(10) feet for each additional story. N�,tn1 Residential structures shall have a maximum of ten(10) feet for each story and subject to the following provisions. (YY N An additional ten (10) feet in height will be allowed for roof line treatment, architectural features such as chimneys, solar energy equipment and mechanical devices. In no case may the air space granted for these purposes above the maximum height limit be used as a habitable room. (f An additional fourteen (14) feet in height may be allowed for elevator equipment. All mechanical devices, except for solar panels, _ shall be set back and screened so that they cannot be seen from public right-of-ways. 4.2.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum allowable site coverage shall be established in each District. Any part of the site covered by a roof, including covered walkways, patios and carports, shall be included in coverage. Exception: Subterranean or semi-subterranean parking less than forty-two (42) inches in height above the adjacent grade shall be subject to the provisions of Section 4.2.12(c). Downtown Specific Plan -11- (1913D) 4.2.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback shall be established in each District. In addition, the following shall apply: (a) No structure or portion of any structure shall project into or over the public ROW. (b) The minimum front yard setback for parking lots and all parking structures above grade shall be ten (10) feet. Structures below 42 Ct inches in height are not subject to this provision. a- (c) The minimum front yard setback for subterranean and semisubterranean parking structures shall be subject to the approval of the Director and the Department of Public Works. The depth of the front yard setback shall be a minimum of five (5) feet. 4.2.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum side yard setback shall be established in each District. In addition, the following shall apply: The minimum exterior side yard setback for parking lots and above grade parking structures shall be ten (10) feet. 4.2.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be established in each District. 4.2.09 Setback (Upper Story). An upper story setback shall be established in each District. 4.2.10 Building Separation. No building shall be closer than ten (10) feet to any other detached building on the same site. 4.2.11 QQen Space. A minimum public open space provision will be established in each District. In addition, the following open space requirements shall apply to all residential developments: (a) Common Open Space: All multi-family residential developments shall provide a'minimum common open space equal to twenty-five (25) percent of the floor area of each unit with a minimum dimension of twenty (20) feet. Common open space shall be designed so that it enhances the appearance of the project to passers-by. In multiple unit subdivision developments, common areas shall be guaranteed by a restrictive covenant describing the common space and its maintenance and improvement, running with the land for the benefit of residents of the development. The developer shall file with the Department of Community Development for recordation with the final subdivision map, legal documents which will provide for restricting the use of common spaces for the designated purpose, as approved on the final development plan. All lands to be conveyed to the homeowner's association shall be subject to the right of the grantee or grantees to enforce maintenance and improvements of the common space. Downtown Specific Plan -12- (1913D) • i (b) Private Open Space: All multi-family residential developments shall provide the following all ground floor units shall be provided with a patio area as set forth below. Minimum Area Min. Dim. Unit Tye (Sq. Ft.) LS1 Bachelor, single or one (1) bedroom 200 10 Two (2) bedrooms 250 10 Three (3) bedrooms 300 10 Four (4) bedrooms 400 10 Units constructed above ground level shall be provided with balconies or sun decks as follows: Minimum Area Min. Dim. Unit Type (5q. Ft ) [EL-) Bachelor, single or one 60 6 (1) bedroom Two (2), three (3), or 120 6 four (4) bedrooms Note: Private open space shall be contiguous to the unit and for the exclusive use of the occupants. Private open space shall not be accessible to any dwelling unit except the unit it serves. Private open space shall be physically separated from common areas by a wall or hedge at least forty-two (42) inches in height. The private open space requirement may be satisfied in whole or in part by areas used for outdoor activities which need not be open to the sky but must be open on at least one (1) side. 4.2.12 Multi-block Consolidations. Where consolidations span two (2) or more Districts, the requirements of each District shall apply to that portion of the development. Divisions between Districts shall be the center line of the vacated street. In addition, the following shall apply: (a) Visitor-serving commercial uses must be provided within that portion of the development designated as a visitor-serving District. (b) Commercial uses must be provided on the ground floor along Main Street. 4.2.13 Parkin . All developments will be required to meet the minimum off-street parking standards of the Huntington Beach Ordinan modified by the Downtown Parking dd&U6f WHM l'�lOmldt'dti(mvit YOf d9D'dd&,/fh&1bU6WYY(g IMiiYdeh�t4AV jA7 A`�1Ki'dg/f6tli ivfY4fAmyylddffd&AlAvdwciYd�t�sllgKdIY,bfdw(6kidw AV1YW1bU6 iYY(g/tA4,16[ ! D' ridtrl�v�hflt�,��(�df�1g/6t��{i>l�✓Ked'��d6hS/�xe✓1,Ilt�� Otbt«idd(AfyWldyVJl4 d,dA64tl;irfAy/IV/IIYbt(4iiY4i Atkft Downtown Specific Plan -13- (1913D) , � ' ! Dr�IYUrS��f>�/i/ft�M/t��kEl�(,�Jy6t/t�fdt,�b�dfd�r��t�afWlS� }�btriK�d/�i�tihllt/�bd,(?JJ/d�f,�l�aMjCti���bl��/d�Sh/bf AW4fl ih6U/t6,6/thVdfOW,fKd/4A6IbWd! ! / r�(g/slM�lYbldf�fd(�SB�d/�1/dh��ild/dt/dfi&lfa'Yf (Y/2JJ/���ktdBYLffi�/JB�bK�dflfd�frSby�Sfd �i�fEd6�Ufalnfd/6�d�G,b�d! ! A(HIJW Vd/oAtkRL hY;iYYbt(AbKdiL&ffbfViY'LYMU3HAM6 ��dt6.6�,(?.00y,f,�t�aflbtid/d�ldYYtt��ttdit'�Lt/tsl,fld�f��d'ltbf i&Wlljg"WO&WyffilsViaYAYdilWjYi6bWYAldAtYcil2ftO f66VtYbW'AUYU ! 8d �',�1�/�kI�Y�LI/�fLvl+�fb�lf�lhbit4iff�~bf/Q bl�s�dd/�hH'/Y�(1vS�1�6f�dd/���E�/dbl�it�d! Exception: Affordable housing projects may reduce the required on-site guest parking. d The guest parking may be provided on-street or in a public parking facility within 350 feet of the affordable housing project, subject to a conditional use permit. Commercial: (W(a) Parking for all commercial projects shall be consistent with the V Downtown Parking Master Plan, Districts 1, 7, 9 shall provide one-hundred (100) percent of the required parking on-site. Districts 3, 4, 5, 6 and 10 shall be provided on site to the maximum extent feasible or as modified in the Parking Master Plan . The �Jejv balance of any required parking shall be provided in facilities within walking distance, not to exceed 350 feet. These off-site parking spaces shall be in place prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for,the any development. W(b) All off-street uncovered surface parking spaces shall be screened. Screening shall be at least five (5) feet high as measured from the adjacent parking surface. Screening shall consist of landscaping or landscaping combined with opaque materials, and must be approved by the Director. 4.2.14 Landscaping. In addition to City standard landscape plans and specifications, the following shall apply: (a) All setback areas fronting on or visible from an adjacent public street, and all recreation, leisure and open space areas shall be landscaped and permanently maintained in an attractive manner and shall be consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines. (b) Permanent automatic electric irrigation facilities shall be provided in all landscaped areas. Downtown Specific Plan -14- (1913D) (c) On-site trees shall be provided in all developments as follows: 6WklJyt}U#I-�'S6d,(Ab&ytA6YbWtY66 three (3) fifteen(15) gallon trees for each residential unit or for each 1,500 square feet of net commercial or office space. AYMAAUibW1ikSWbU6WYvW ftU6 aff4iA/6f/tK1ti*A,§W4 YAtNbbWtVii�&Ys(Ay bfY4)Ydi,idW where feasible (except when palm trees are required): Seventy-five (75) percent of the total requirement shall be thirty-six (36) inch box trees and the remaining twenty-five (25) percent of such requirement may be provided at a ratio of one (1) inch for one (1) inch through the use of twenty-four (24) inch box trees. Additional trees and shrubs shall also be planted to provide a well-balanced landscape environment. Exception: Structures fronting on Main Street, Fifth Street and Third Street, with a required five (5) foot setback shall be exempt from this requirement. (d) A landscape and irrigation plan in conformance with the adopted Design Guidelines shall be subject to approval by the Director and the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of building permits. (e) All parking lots shall provide a decorative masonry wall or landscaped berm installed in the setback area, all landscaping shall be installed within the parking lot area, in accordance with the Huntngton Beach Ordinance Code. Parking structures must all screen street-level parking areas from the public ROW. Such screening must be approved by the Director. The setback area shall be landscaped in accordance with the following guidelines and a landscape plan shall be submitted to and aproved by the Director: • Planting material shall include at a minimum 6W4M three (3) fifteen (15) gallon size tree and three (3) five (5) gallon size shrubs for each seventy-five (75) square feet of landscaped area Aht NtllWdt'kYA&UyldfbW-IiYYJ((YgYA tUA666d itW,fbithaldW&WhMdbVd1dA&Edify/(YffiYi4(Wd1fd6A16f/ UAdgKIWkVc';6 where feasible (except when palm trees are required). • The setback area shall be planted with suitable groundcover. • The landscaped area shall be provided with an irrigation system which conforms to the standards specified for landscaped medians by the Department of Public Works. • All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and attractive manner. 4.2.15 Street Vacations. The following conditions will apply to City vacation of streets and alleys for consolidation of parcels greater than one block in size. Downtown Specific Plan -15- (1913D) r (a) Streets shall be vacated only after the City has analyzed the impacts on circulation patterns and determined that the vacation will not be detrimental. (b) Where streets are to be vacated, the cost of relocating all utilities shall be borne by the developer; the City Council may waive this requirement. (c) Any public parking lost by street vacations must be replaced either on or off site or through in lieu fees. Such parking shall be in addition to required parking for the proposed use. (d) Consolidations that require vacation of a portion of Main Street north of Orange Avenue shall provide a public plaza space that will enhance the Main Street corridor to the pier. The type of facility and its design shall be approved by the City. (e) At the discretion of the DAY Planning Commission, all or portions of Main Street may be used for a pedestrian mall. (f) Any development_proposing the vacation of streets intersecting PCH in District 2 and District 3 shall provide a view corridor not less than the width of the former street between Walnut Avenue and PCH. No structures greater than fiV&(5j)f0i thirty-six (36) inches in height shall be allowed within such view corridor. A pedestrian easement ten (10) feet wide shall be provided through the development generally parallel to the vacated street. 4.2.16 Access Ways. The following standards shall apply to all vehicular access ways: (a) Developments abutting Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and Main Street shall dedicate sufficient additional -I-and along the alleys parallel to these rights-of-way so that t. :leys have an ultimate width of fhftoy 1304 twenty-four (24) feet :.: the case of commercial or mixed use developments, or twenty (20) feet in the case of residential only developments. Access to development shall be permitted from these alleys. Access to development shall not be taken directly from PCH or Main Street; new automobile curb cuts on these rights-of-way are prohibited. (b) Private access ways shall have a minimum paved width of not less than twenty-eight (28) feet. An additional twelve (12) foot wide travel lane may be required in each direction of traffic flow into the development for a distance of one hundred (100) feet, where an access way intersects a local or arterial public street. (c) Private access ways exceeding one hundred fifty (150) feet in length but less than three hundred (300) feet in length, shall be provided with a turn-around having a minimum radius of thirty-one (31) feet. For those access ways exceeding three hundred (300) feet but less than six hundred (600) feet, there shall be provided a turn-around having a minimum radius of forty (40) feet or an intertying loop circulation system. For those access ways exceeding six hundred (600) feet, there shall be provided an intertying loop circulation system. Downtown Specific Plan -16- (1913D) • Y 4.2.17 Lightin . For developments of more than two (2) units, the developer shall install an on-site lighting system on all vehicular access ways and along major walkways. Such lighting shall be directed onto driveways and walkways within the development and away from adjacent properties. Lighting shall also be installed within all covered and enclosed parking areas. A lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Director. 4.2.18 Outside Storage Space. Where a proposed residential development does not include a separate attached garage for each dwelling unit, a minimum of one hundred (100) cubic feet of outside storage space shall be provided for each such unit. 4.2.19 Sewer and Water Systems. Sewer and water systems shall be designed to City standards and shall be located underneath streets, alleys or drives. In no case shall individual sewer lines or sewer mains for.a dwelling unit be permitted to extend underneath any other dwelling unit. 4.2.20 Sim. All signs in the development shall conform to the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Commercial signs in mixed developments shall not be intrusive to residential development or other uses and shall be consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines. (a) The placement of address numbers shall be at a uniform location throughout the development and shall be approved by the Director. (b) When appropriate, the developer shall install on-site street name signs at the intersections of access ways, as approved by the City Engineer. Street name signs shall also be approved by the Director for design and type and shall be consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines. All signs required by this section shall be installed at the approved locations prior to the time the first dwelling unit is occupied. 4.2.21 Refuse Collection Areas. In residential development, refuse collection areas shall be provided within two hundred (200) feet of the units they are to serve. In all developments, trash areas shall be enclosed or screened with a masonry wall, and shall be situated in order to minimize noise and visual intrusion on adjacent property as well as to eliminate fire hazard to adjacent structures. Residents shall be provided with collection areas that are separate and distinct from the collection area of offices and other commercial activities. 4.2.22 Vehicular Storage. Storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles (as NGW --•> defined herein) and other similar vehicles shall be prohibited unless specifically designated areas for the storage of such vehicles are set aside on the final development plan and, in the case of condominium developments, provided for in the association's covenants, conditions, and restrictions. Where such areas are provided, they shall be enclosed and screened from view on a horizontal plane from adjacent areas by a combination of a six (6) foot high masonry wall and permanently maintained landscaping. 4.2.23 Antennas. All roof top antennas are prohibited. i Downtown Specific Plan -17- (1913D) a . 4.2.24 Utility Lines. All utility lines shall be undergrounded where possible. 4.2.25 Bus Turnouts. In commericial developments of one half block or more, dedication shall be made for bus turnouts as recommended by O.C.T.D. Any bus turnout so recommended shall be incorporated as part of the development plan. 4.2.26 Orange County Transit District Center. A transit center shall be located within proximity of the downtown area which will provide pedestrians access to the beach and retail services. 4.2.27 Homeowners' or Community Association. All multiple unit subdivision developments shall be approved subject to submission of a legal instrument or instruments setting forth a plan or manner of permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas. and communal facilities. No such instrument shall be acceptable until approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and effect, and by the Department of Community Development as to suitability for the proposed use of the open areas. If the common open spaces are to be conveyed to the homeowners' association, the developer shall file a declaratic: of covenants, to be submitted with the application for approval, that will govern the association. The provisions shall include, but not be limited to, the followin (a) The homeowners' association shall be established prior to the initial sale of the last dwelling units. (b) Membership shall be mandatory for each buyer and any successive buyer. (c) The open space restrictions shall be permanent. 4.2.28 Compliance with certain requirements of the Coastal Zone (CZ) Suffix: Projects shall comply with the following sections of the Coastal Zone Suffix: "Community Facilities"; "Diking, Dredging and Filling"; "Hazards"; "Buffer Requirements"; "Energy'; and "Signs" as identified in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4.2.29 Affordable Housing N.Q W Residential projects that offer 50% of the units to persons and households earning between 80-100% of the Orange County Median Income as defined by HUD for a period of 30 years may be eligible for a reduction in the following development standards. Guest Parking — If determined by the Planning Commission that adequate excess public -king is available the Planning Commission may grant a maximum 100% waiver depending on size and location of project. Downtown Specific Plan —18— (1913D) i Common Open Space - Maximum 70% reduction if replaced by private open space. (roof decks may be used to satisfy a portion of this requirement) Site Coverage - Maximum 75%. Height - Maximum four stories in any district. _ Density- The Floor Area Ratio formula may be substituted for units per acre in each district. A maximum 1.0 Floor Area Ratio will apply to affordable projects. Minimum Unit - Studio 300 square feet Size 1 bedroom 450 square feet 2 bedroom 800 square feet It is the intent of these provisions to provide maximum design flexibility while still maintaining high quality design standards in exchange for affordable housing. 4.2.30 School Facilities: A school facilities impact mitigation and reimbursement agreement shall be a condition of approval for any subdivision, tentative GVJ tract, or parcel map within the Specific Plan. The agreement shall provide for the adequate mitigation of impacts on the elementary and/or high school district providing adequate funding of school facilities necessary to serve the student population generated by the proposed development. This condition may be waived by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and will not apply to affordable housing projects as defined in the Specific Plan_ 4.2.31 Historic Properties: The Historic Resources Board shall provide recommendations for structures considered to be historically significant as identified in the City's 1989 Historic Survey to the Design Review Board and Planning Commission. Downtown Specific Plan -19- (1913D) 4.3 DISTRICT #1: VISITOR-SERVING COMMERCIAL Purpose. This District is limited to three nodes fronting on Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) which are adjacent to medium and high density residential Districts. These nodes provide sites for commercial facilities to serve visitors to the City and State Beaches. The area between Goldenwest and 6th Streets will be primarily medium to high density residential. Residential uses will also be permitted in this District, as long as the necessary visitor-serving uses are included in the development. Boundaries. District #1 includes three nodes: The two blocks from Goldenwest to 21st Streets, between PCH and the midline of the alley; the two blocks from 18th to 16th Streets, between PCH and the midline of the alley; and the block from 9th to 6th between PCH and the midline of the alley. Downtown Specific Plan -20- (1913D) 0000� 0000000000000000000o O 00000000 � 000000000000 � 00000000 0 0 �0000000 � 0000� 00000000000000 ��� '� .�oaoo�o 00 �� t;4 flu, oo 00 00 00 00 00 0� oo � o0 0o a in �COAST mm 9� 000 � 000000 � .:. 1 � � � DISTRICT 1 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN 4.3.01 Permitted Uses. (a) New construction and establishment of new commercial and/or mixed-use projects which cater to year round residents in District #1 may be 0hbVAtkb f allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. For Example: • Banks _ Bicycle sales, rental and repair Bookstores • Clothing stores • Delicatessens • Drug stores • Dry Cleaning • Florists • Groceries • Hardware stores • Laundromats, laundries • Newstands • Offices • Office supplies • Public facilities • Restaurants Service station minimum 14,000 square feet, no repair k permitted, no service bays Shoe repair Sporting goods • Other related uses (b) A change to the following uses in District #1 may be allowed subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: Health and sports clubs Liquor stores Live entertainment O Permanent parking lots and parking structures Residential uses • Restaurants • Service station (c) Visitor-serving commercial uses must be a part of all development proposed in this District, with the following minimum requirements; for projects with less than a half-block of frontage, the entire street level must be devoted to visitor-serving uses; for projects with a half-block or more of frontage, either the entire street level, or at least one-third (1/3) of the total floor area must be devoted to visitor-serving commercial uses. Downtown Specific Plan -21- (1913D) s ' (d) Residential uses are allowed only in conjuction with visitor-serving commercial uses. The required visitor-serving commercial portion of any initial construction shall be provided prior to or at the same time as any residential portion. No residential unit shall be occupied until the required commercial portion is completed. Projects which are proposed to be phased must proportionately develop the commercial and residential concurrently. _ 4.3.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be 10,000 sq. ft. of net site area and one hundred (100) feet of frontage on PCH. . .03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall be 25 per net acre. Floor Area Ratio 1.0. OIL4.3.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be flVf1*AW&(8W1hVY1dA61no more than three (3) stories. 4.3.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. 4.3.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be twenty-five (25) feet from Pacific Coast Highway right-of-way. This setback may be reduced to twenty (20) feet on up to fifty (50) percent of the frontage, provided that the average setback for total site frontage is not less than twenty-five (25) feet. The setback area shall be limited to landscaping only and shall be designed to be compatible with the Bluff Top Landscaping area located across Pacific Coast Highway. 4.3.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum aggregate side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Interior side yard setback shall be twenty (20) percent of lot frontage total with not less than seven (7) feet on a side. (b) Exterior side yard setback shall be twenty (20) percent of lot frontage total with not less than fifteen (15) feet, from any public ROW. 4.3.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Structures may be cantilevered to the rear property line. Note: An additional right-of-way dedication will be required to widen the alley to twenty-four (24) feet for mixed use and commercial projects. �I Downtown Specific Plan -22- (1913D) 4.3.09 Setback (URoer Story). The covered portion of all stories above the second shall be set back an average of an additional ten (10) feet from the second story facade. 4.3.10 Open Space. A public open space and pedestrian access amenity, subject to approval of the Director, may be required for development projects one full block or greater in size; in order to assure a predominantly visitor—serving orientation. Downtown Specific Plan —23— (1913D) 4.4 DISTRICT #2: RESIDENTIAL pie. This District allows residential development exclusively. While allowing higher densities, the District employs graduated height limits and proportional setback requirements to keep the scale of new developments compatible with the existing residential neighborhood. ^J Boundaries. District #2 includes the first block along PCH to Walnut Avenue between Goldenwest Street and 6th Streets except for the area included in District #1. 23 Downtown Specific PIan —24— (1913D) i FALM [ILI U[I � �� Q � 0000 � 0000 HU00 00000000000000 � 0°����' � � ago.o� t40000.o.u u. ooa0000000000 �u �o �� t4 u boo oo L PACIFIC CWT_MY PACIFIC OCEAN m HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA � ��„,,,G DEPARTMENT DISTRICT 2 DOWNTOWN SPECIF. PLAN 4.4.01 Permitted Uses. The following residential uses iMU may be O&bifriAkW allowed in District #2: multi-family housing, apartments, condominiums and stock-cooperatives subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Exception: Single Family Detached Dwellings which comply with the development standards of District 2 shall be subject to approval of the Design Review Board. Note: Reference Resolution No. 5760 4.4.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be twenty-five (25) feet of frontage and 2,500 square foot net size area. 4.4.03 Maximum DensityAntensity. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall increase as the parcel size increases according to the following: Lot Size (Frontage) Maximum Allowable Density less than 50' 1 du < 2d,�f �L�t/�Etb�(Ldi�Jl(760' 51' up to 100' 30 units per net acre (r/dz�/rOA2 out i4Ifaf IM60 101' - full block 35 units net acre F1 No Floor Area Ratio will apply to this District 4.4.04 Maximum Building Heigh : The maximum building height shall be b�l�t fh1 ty/�71i�4f�A8WLWt'faf Wno more than three (3) stories. 4.4.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. 4.4.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be as follows: (a) Parcels fronting on PCH, require a minimum setback of twenty-five (25) feet. This setback shall be limited to landscaping only and shall be designed to be compatible with the Bluff Top landscaping located across Pacific Coast Highway. Note: This setback may be reduced by five (5) feet on up to fifty(50) percent of the frontage, provided that the average setback for the total site frontage is not less than twenty-five (25) feet. (b) Parcels fronting all other streets except PCH, require fifteen (15) feet. This setback may be reduced to eight (8) feet on up to fifty (50)percent of the frontage provided that the average setback for the total site frontage is not less than fifteen (15) feet. 2� Downtown Specific Plan -25- (1913D) 4.4.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum aggregate side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Parcels with one hundred (100) feet or less of frontage require twenty (20) percent of the lot frontage, with not less than three (3) feet on 2 side. Exterior yards require not less than five (5) feet from a public FeOW. Exception: Garages located on a single twenty-five (25) foot wide lot*, will be allowed an exterior yard reduction to not less than three (3) feet from a public ROW. * Note: Twenty-five (25) foot wide lots may have a zero interior side yard setback on one side if: 1) adjacent property is under same ownership and developed at the same time; 2) at least five (5) feet is provided on the opposite side yard of both properties; 3) no portion of a building at a zero lot line is closer than six (6) feet to an adjacent building, if the buildings are not abutting. (b) Parcels with greater than one hundred (100) feet but less than a half block of frontage•require twenty (20) percent of the frontage, with not less than seven (7) feet on any interior yard, and not less than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. (c) Parcels with greater than a half block of frontage require not less than seven (7) feet on any interior yard and not less than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. 4.4.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be as follows: (a) Parcels fronting on PCH require not less than three (3) feet. Note: An additional right-of-way dedication will be required to widen the alley to twenty (20) feet. (b) Parcels fronting all other streets, except PCH, require not less than seven and one-half (7.5) feet. Structures may be cantilevered into this setback, however, not closer than two and one-half (2.5) feet from the rear property line. 4.4.09 Setback (Upper Story). The covered portion of all structures above the second story shall be set back an average of an additional ten (10) feet from the second story facade. Downtown Specific Plan -26- (1913D) 4.4.10 QRen Space: (a) Projects which maintain the twenty-five (25) foot front setback along Pacific Coast Highway shall be allowed to use the front setback area towards common open space. Any encroachments into the twenty-five (25) foot front setback area shall require common open space to be located behind the front setback. (b) No public open space shall be required in this District. 4.4.11 Resource Production Overlay. A portion of District #2 is designated with an Oil Suffix (O, 01). Within this area, all the requirements of the resource production overlay shall apply (see Section 4.14). 21 Downtown Specific Plan -27- (1913D) 4.5 DISTRICT #3: VISITOR—SERVING COMMERCIAL Purpose. This District is limited to the five blocks fronting on Pacific Coast Highway across from the City pier. The visitor—serving category is broad enough to include many commercial activities which will also serve the needs of the surrounding community, providing an off—season clientele for the District. The plan also allows residential and office uses in this District so long as the required visitor—serving commercial is provided. Large amounts of ground level open space are encouraged in this District to further promote the feeling of openness and to provide additional view opportunities. Boundaries. District #3 includes the area between PCH and Walnut, from 6th to ZfaW$UMY 1st Streets. Downtown Specific Plan —28— (1913D) � UUU PECAN ORANGE OLIVE H 0 Or h N N N H H WALNUT cn " p Z v� Z W N tL _ - O ..Lu JL L L � JL iil�ll d' 0 ...::........ EL PACIFIC COAST HWY. PACIRC OaM MIAJ W.a fL� � DISTRICT 3 1R � DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN , 21 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DMSION 4.5.01 Permitted Uses. (a) New construction and establishment of a commercial core which serves as the transition between visitor-serving and year round commercial uses in District #3 may be 66YdAk W allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. FAA N"&Ordf Art gallery • Bakeries • Beach, swimming and surfing equipment • Bicycle rental and repair Bookstores • Clothing stores • Ice cream parlors Newstands Photographic processing • Tourist related public and semi-public buildings, services and facilities Other related uses (b)A change to the following uses in District #3 may be allowed subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: Arcades ! A(�ddi6fd ! fMAW YYdti/f�bldi'! Dancing and/or live entertainment as a primary or accessory use Hotel and licensed bed and breakfast designed as a commercial • Liquor stores • Permanent parking lots and parking structures • Restaurants • Residential uses* Retail sales, outdoor Theaters *Note: This use is prohibited on the ground floor or street level fronting on Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway. (c) The ground floor or street level of all buildings in this District fronting Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway shall be devoted to visitor-serving commercial activities. (d) Visitor-serving commercial uses must be a part of all development proposed in this District with a minimum requirement that the entire street level, and at least one-third (1/3) of the total floor area be devoted to visitor-serving commercial uses. (e) Residential uses shall only be permitted if the development includes consolidation of a one block or greater area. Downtown Specific Plan -29- (1913D) Note: Residential uses a allowed only in conjunction with visitor-serving commercial uses. Up to one-half(1/2) of the floor area of projects may be devoted to residential uses. (f) The required visitor-serving commercial portion of any project shall be provided prior to or at the same time as any residential portion. No residential unit shall be occupied until the required commercial portion is complete. (g) In the event of a consolidation of a minimum one block area, non-priority (residential) uses may be located in separate structures or on separate portions of the parcel in the context of a planned development, provided no less than one-half of the total floor area permitted is devoted to visiter-serving uses, and provided that substantial public open space and pedestrian access amenities are provided to maintain a predominantly visitor-serving orientation. 4.5.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of net site area af UUy twenty-five (25) feet of frontage. 4.5.03 Maximum DensiV/Intensity. The maximum intensity of development shall be calculated by floor area ratios (FAR) for this District. The floor area ratio shall apply to the entire project area. Floor area ratios shall be calculated on net acreage. (a) The maximum floor area for developments in this District shall be calculated with the following multiples: Lot Size Maximum FAR less than half block 2.0 one-half block-full block 2.5 GIB full block or greater 3.0 (b) The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) 4� shall be 35 units per net acre. 4.5.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be as follows: h Lot iz Height less than full block 3 stories/A9M.. L full block or greater 4 storiesAflS /t.. 4.5.05 Maximum Site Coverage. No maximum site coverage required 4.5.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be fifteen (15) feet. Exception: Parcels fronting on Fifth and Third Streets may be reduced to five (5) feet. Parcels fronting on Main Street must develop to a build-to-line* within five (5) feet from the property line. .3 � Downtown Specific Plan -30- (1913D) J *Note: The build-to requirement can be satisfied by extending any of the following to within five (5) feet of the property line: 1) the facade of the ground floor level; 2) a plaza or patio used for open-air commercial activity, 3) a low-wall or fence (not exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height), planters or other architectural features, which extend along at least fifty (50) percent of the frontage along the lot line; 4) two (2) side walls and second story facade. Note: The following may be permitted in the front yard setback on 6th Street, 5th Street, 3rd Street, Main Street, First Street and PCH: benches, bicycle racks, transparent wind screens and open-air commercial facilities. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required for parcels fronting on PCH of five (5) feet, for additional parkway and sidewalk; and two and one-half(2-1/2) for parcels fronting on Sixth Street. 4.5.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum aggregate side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Parcels fronting on Sixth, Second and Lake Streets require twenty (20) percent of lot frontage, with not less than seven (7) feet for an interior yard and not less than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. (b) Parcels fronting on Fifth, Main and Third Streets and Pacific Coast Highway require zero for an interior yard. Exterior side yard requirements shall equal the front yard setback for the respective street. 4.5.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Structures may be cantilevered to the rear property line. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to widen the alley to thirty (30) feet. 4.5.09 Setback (Upper Storv). Upper story setbacks for this District shall be as follows: (a) Parcels fronting PCH, 6th, 2nd and ZIA1 1st Streets require all stories above the second to be set back an average of twenty-five (25) feet from the ultimate street ROW. Up to fifty (50) percent of the building frontage may be set back fifteen (15) feet from the ROW, providing that the average setback on upper stories is no less than twenty-five (25) feet. (b) Parcels fronting on 5th and 3rd Street require that any part of the building facade above the second story shall be set back ten (10) feet from the first story facade_ (c) Parcels fronting on Main Street require that no building or portion of a building above the second story shall be within WO&WriVi! (2&3 ten (10) feet of the build-to line. Downtown Specific Plan -31- (1913D) (d) That portion of structures exceeding thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back a minimum of ten (10) feet from the interior side yard property line. 4.5.10 Open apace. All development projects within this District shall provide a public open space amenity. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the net site area must be provided for such a purpose. (a) Full block developments on Main Street require public plazas at the corner of PCH and Main Street. These street level public plazas shall be incorporated into the design of the development and approved by the Director. Such plazas shall have the following characteristics: • Location: street level corner; one side must face Main Street. • Area: not less than one thousand (1,000) square feet excluding public right-of-way. • Landscaping: not less than thirty (30) percent of the plaza area should be planted. • Paving: all paved areas shall be textured. • Visual Feature: plazas must include a sculpture, fountain, information kiosk, pond, display, or similar visual amenity. • Public Seating shall be provided. • Open Air Commercial: not more than fifty (50) percent of the plaza area may be used for open air commercial uses. AIMIl! Pad td�XA��Gbb�f��f!/ '�d�t�b tbSi�t a�sfs'�d/�hd�t �/ a�ji/Fd�lt tfrf {d/�d Lbit�f�l��3'�:G �I�tS�E/t�/t'Mfs!/IDlf itl�i/v4�NI��tZity/>4t�K/5Y�1�/B��Eh�s! i/A/EbNd3'YiWdf/ ¢ Ghf�,l/fdt/�tS t �W ,�l nft/dfi(/dt/fieittY�i- >;�SbEI�I'�biiElf/,�Md�l�/�LEhitlll�lIDdtiftdt!/lgbi�l�7�iy/�oNafjihk�alrt/d/t'bifst f�tfi�l�ffdt�/tf/bfid/Q'��t�dthitd�/il4�t/bVdt �fafi/d/d�5t�ld��4�y� t�talY,66f�i'd�tltS��El�lbsl��/�1�H'd�t¢�S/6�Y�6/d�Vdld�tt'�l Downtown Specific Plan -32- (1913D) 4.6 DISTRICT #4: MIXED-USE: OFFICE RESIDENTIAL P=gse. This District flanks the Downtown core area, separating the area along Main Street from the outlying areas which are primarily residential. The purpose of this District is to provide a transition zone between the existing residential areas to the commercial Main Street corridor. Consequently, mixes of offfice and residential uses are permitted. Boundaries. District #4 includes the blocks on the northwest side of the Main Street core area from 6th Street to Sth Street and from 3rd Street to First Street, between Walnut and Orange Avenues. Downtown Specific Plan -33- (1913D) REMOVED FROM DISTRICT 4 AND ADDED TO DISTRICT 5 � UUU PECAN ORANGE OLIVE 25 WALNUT ZLu rL_ W N H 0 Z W ? N V cn Z Lu PACIFIC COAST HWY. NIA7 d*JA� DISTRICT 4 1 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION 4.6.01 Permitted Uses. The following principal uses and structures iMU/ k AbWVLfiEM may be allowed in District #4 subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: (a) Residential Use - all th&dbdYyYVbW!YAHMdtvftliyv &fAtlji/atzid multi-family housing, apartments, condominiums and stock cooperatives. lSPdt�l/l9'yKK�Y�/l�i�tz�1�►/I7�t z�b�f�NDry44YYUtS��tafYidENb6fz�iji/�►(z'SiElz��hf3l d�V�1'd�frS�ItY�tfaldd�3'sthh�d7tYYdzEtYR#?J:E}'�LI/t��lYzSb�fYY/t6fhiK�/�¢(i6Etif�d/df t!'�117�d gtz��(ri�6/B(Y�z!d/i!tlM,btt brf ial�Kdz'itii�teSfz'alY,(z��l�tz'�f i'�! (b) Office Use - professional, general business and non-profit offices. (c) Mixed-Use - Mixed Residential/Office Use developments shall be permitted provided that residential uses- Be segregated to separate structure or restricted to the second story or above; Not occupy any portion of the same story with non-residential uses, unless they are provided with adequate physical and acoustical separation; Be on contiguous floors within a single str:_.ure; Be provided with separate pedestrian ingress and egress; Be provided with secured, designated parking. (d) Commercial Use - Commercial uses which are integrated within ana clearly incidental to an office use, shall be permitted provided that it cumulatively does not exceed ten (10) percent of total gross floor areas of the development. (e) R or m cia���t�tl�ona ground floor fron e S e n 4.6.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be twenty-five hundred (2500) square feet and twenty (25) feet of frontage. However, existing lots �alY�f/YM�N�ftfizy/(S01J/f��f/i'�i/vt�i8�ilt twenty-five (25) feet in width or greater shall not be subdivided to create smaller parcels. 4.6.03 Maximum DensilyLntensity. The maximum allowable number of residentiai dwelling units (du) shall be ?.&bYAYPWAYiit/ittt,/d/DW/N/74?/Y4(tbdd/fLi& Mt/dbf/z tby: Lot Size (Frontage) Maximum Allowable Density Less than 50' 1 du 51• - 100, 30 units net acre 101' - full block 35 units net acre 4.6.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be fYJff*hfilWA&3YIAMYfa vWno more than three (3) stories. Downtown Specific Plan -34- (1913D) 4.6.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. 4.6.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height, shall be fifteen (15) feet. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required for parcels fronting on Sixth Street, of two and one-half(2-1/2). 4.6.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum aggregate side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Parcels with one hundred (100) feet or less of frontage require twenty (20) percent of the lot frontage, with not less than three (3) feet on a side. Exterior yards require not less than five (5) feet from a public ROW. Exception: Garages located on a single twenty-five (25) foot wide lot., will be allowed an exterior yard reduction to not less than three (3) feet from a public ROW. i * Note: Twenty-five (25) foot wide lots may have a zero interior side yard setback on one side if: 1) adjacent property is under same ownership and developed at the same time; 2) at least five (5) feet is provided on the opposite side yard of both properties; 3) no portion of a building at a zero lot line is closer than six (6) feet to an adjacent building, if the buildings are not abutting. (b) Parcels with greater than one hundred (100) feet but less than a half block of frontage require twenty (20) percent of the frontage, with not less than seven (7) feet on any interior yard, and not less than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. (c) Parcels with greater than a half block of frontage require not less than seven (7),feet on any interior yard and not less than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. 4.6.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Structures may be cantilevered to the rear property line. Note: An additional ROW dedication may be required to widen the alley to ffdity/(30� twenty-four (24) feet. 4.6.09 Setback (Upper Story). The covered portion of all stories above the second shall be set back an average of twenty-five (25) feet from the ultimate ROW. Up to fifty (50) percent of the building frontage may be set back fifteen (15) feet from the ROW, providing that the average setback on upper stories is no less than twenty-five (25) feet. That portion of structures which exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back a minimum of forty-five (45) feet from the exterior property lines. 4.6.10 Omen Space. No public open space shall be required in this District. 3� Downtown Specific Plan -35- (1913D) . 4.7 DISTRICT #5: MIXED-USE: COMMERCIAL/OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL PIM2gse. This District includes the blocks on either side of and including Main Street, and constitutes the oldest commercial area in the City. The purpose of this District is to re-establish the area as the Downtown for the City by creating a more urban atmosphere, encouraging relatively higher intensity development with viable commercial office and residential uses. View corridors along with height and orientation restrictions in the development requirements of this District are intended to focus development on the Main Street corridor. The Main Street-pier axis is intended to be an active, vital and interesting pedestrian way, intersecting with and complementing the visitor-serving commercial area on PCH and the pier area. The District promotes mixed uses of commercial, office and residential developments. Boundaries. District #5 includes the area from 5th Street to 3rd Street between Walnut and Orange Avenues. `p Downtown Specific Plan -36- (1913D) a ADDED TO DISTRICT 5 _ FROM DISTRICT 4 JUUU PECAN ORANGE .. OLNE N N N N h H WALNUT JL � H t~ N I ILW ZJL 0 Z hJ LL Z V H y LX LL PACIFIC COAST HWY. PAaFlc OCM YI Lb OEM Cd or m DISTRICT 5 1 R DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN 3 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DMSION i 4.7.01 Permitted Uses. (a) New construction and establishment of a commercial core which serves as the transition between visitor serving and year round commercial uses in District #5 may be 0fitWW allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. For Example: Antique stores • Art gallery Bakeries • Banks and savings and loans branch offices Barber, beauty, manicure shops • Beach, swimming and surfing equipment Bicycle sales, rental and repair • Boat and marine supplies • Bookstores • Boutiques • Clothing stores Delicatessens • Drug stores • Dry cleaning • Florist • General Retail Groceries • Hardware stores • Hobby supplies Ice cream parlors Jewelry stores Laundromats • Newstands Offices • Office supplies • Photographic processing • Shoe repair • Shoe stores Sporting god Tailor shops • Travel agency • Other related uses (b) A change to the following uses in District #5 may be allowed subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: Health and sports clubs Liquor stores • Live entertainment • Permanent parking lots and parking structures • Residential uses Restaurants (c) The ground floor area or street level of all buildings fronting Main h Street in this District shall be devoted to commercial activities. a V (1) Commercial or residential may be permitted on the ground ._\ floor between Olive and Orange Avenue fronting Sth Street and 3rd Street. Downtown Specific Plan -37- (1913D) (d) The following uses may be permitted above the first floor: (i) Commercial Use - all commercial uses allowed on the first floor if the uses are a continuation from the first floor use. (ii) Office Use - professional, general business and non-profit offices provided that: _ No sales either wholesale or retail which involve delivery of any goods or material to or from the premises occur. • No inventory is kept on the premise other than samples. • No processing, manufacturing, storage or repair of merchandise of any kind occurs. (iii) Residential Use - Residential uses are allowed only in conjunction with commercial uses in this District. Up to one-third (1/3) of the floor area of projects on parcels smaller than a full block may be devoted to residential uses; projects on full block or larger parcels, up to one-half(1/2) of the floor area may be devoted to residential uses provided that residential uses in addition to the following: • Be segregated to a separate structure or restricted to the second story or above; • Not occupy any portion of the same story with non-residential uses, unless they are provided with adequate physical and acoustical separation; • Be on contiguous floors within a single structure; • Be provided with separate pedestrian ingress and egress; • Be provided with secured, designated parking. 4.7.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be twenty-five hundred (2500) square feet and twenty-five (25) feet of frontage. 4.7.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum intensity of development shall be calculated by floor area ratio (FAR) for this District. The floor area ratio shall apply to the entire project area. Floor area ratios shall be 2.0 calculated on net acreage. Downtown Specific Plan -38- (1913D) (a) The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall be 1 du/1,742 square feet net lot area or 25 du net acre. 4.7.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be as follows: Lot Size (Frontage) Height less than a full block 3 storiesAA4 AN. full block 4 stories )W.. 4.7.05 Maximum Site Coverage. No maximum site coverage shall be required in this District. 4.7.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be fifteen (15) feet. Exception Parcels fronting on Fifth and Third Streets may be reduced to five (5) feet and parcels fronting on Main Street must develop within (5) feet of the property line. *Note: The build-to requirement can be satisfied by extending any of the following to within five (5) feet of the property line: 1) the facade of the ground floor level; 2) a plaza or patio used for open-air commercial activity; 3) a low-wall or fence (not exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height), planters or other architectural features, which extend along at least fifty (50) percent of the frontage along the lot line; 4) two (2) side walls and second story facade. Note: The following may be permitted in the front yard setback on Fifth Street, Third Street and Main Street benches, bicycle racks, transparent wind screens and open-air commercial facilities. 4.7.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Interior yard requirements shall be zero. (b) Exterior yards require five (5) feet from a public ROW. 4.7.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Structures may be cantilevered to the rear property line. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to widen the alley to thirty (30) feet. 4.7.09 Setback (Upper Storms. The covered portion of all stories above the second shall be set back an average of an additional ten (10) feet from the second story facade. 4.7.10 Open Space. Parcels having one hundred (100) feet or more of street frontage, within this District shall provide a public open space amenity. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the net site area must be provided for such a purpose, in all non-residential development. • Downtown Specific Plan -39- (1913D) Exception: Mixed use developments which include residential units, may reduce the public open space to five (5) percent of the net site area. (a) Full block developments on Main Street require public plazas. These street level public plazas shall be incorporated into the design of the development and approved by the Director. Such plazas shall have the following characteristics: • Location: street level corner; one side must face Main Street. • Area: not less than one thousand (1,000) square feet excluding public right-of--way. • Landscaping: not less than thirty (30) percent of the plaza area should be planted. • Paving: all paved areas shall be textured. • Visual Feature: plaza must include a sculpture, fountain, information kiosk, pond, display, or similar visual amenity. • Public Seating shall be provided. • Open Air Commercial: not more than fifty (50) percent of the privately owned publicly used plaza area may be used for open air commercial uses. This provision will be subject to the standards outlined in the Carts and Kiosks Ordinance. Downtown Specific Plan -40- (1913D) . 4.8 DISTRICT #6: MIXED USE: COMMERCIAL/OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL PuWse. This District encompasses the area north of the Downtown core and includes the public library. It is intended to provide a location for neighborhood commercial enterprises to serve surrounding residents, as well as office space, public facilities and residential uses. This mixed use node will anchor the inland end of the Main/Pier corridor. Boundaries. District #6 consists of the blocks located between Sixth Street and Lake Street from Orange Avenue to Palm Avenue. �a Downtown Specific Plan —41— (1913D) PALM ACACIA fo ?� F / \ PECAN ORANGE N LY N N N N H ►- N � to WALNUT Z z = _ Z z JLJ LJED I" t; O W N L C� N 1L PACIFIC COAST HM. Afft DISTRICT 6 lRy DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION 4.8.01 Permitted Uses. (a) New construction and establishment of new commercial and/or mixed-7— projects which cater to year round residents in Distri:- : may be O ,kEi allowed subject to :ne approval of a Condit:c,::al Use Permit. FAMAZAAfiW. • Antique Stores • Banks • Bicycle sales, rental and repair • Bookstores Clothing stores Delicatessens • Drug stores Dry Cleaning • Florists • Glass Shops Groceries Hardware stores • Ice House • Laundromats, laundries • Newstands • Offices Office supplies Public facilities • Restaurants • Shoe repair • Sporting gas • Other related uses Existing auto uses may remain (b) A change to the following uses in Distr:_. ma;- 3e allowed subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: • Health and sports clubs Liquor stores Live entertainment Permanent parking lots and parking structures • Residential uses Restaurants - (c) Residential uses are allowed in conjunction and/or separate from commercial uses in this district subject to conditional use permit except for single family dwellings. (d) The frontage on 3rd and Lake Streets between Orange and Palm _Avenues may be residential. 4.8.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be fiV&tl'S64i9ldm4U0,00') two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet and ffft'SfIM twenty-five (25) feet of frontage. Existing parcels greater than twenty-five (25) feet in width shall not be subdivided to create 2,500 square foot lots. 0 Downtown Specific Plan -42- (1913D) 4.8.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum intensity of development shall be calculated by floor area ratio (FAR) for this District. The floor area ratio shall apply to the entire project area. Floor area ratios shall be calculated on net acreage. (a) The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units shall be 1 du/1,742 square feet net lot area or twenty-five (25) units per net acre. (b) Lot Size Maximum F.A.R. Less than half-block )�q Half-block 2.5 F,uU49eek or greater 3.0 a (� 4.8.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be as follows: Lot Size (Frontage) Heigbt less than 100' 2 stories Aff)Wdt 100' up to but less than 3 stories A&5)Wdf a full block full block 4 stories AWWUR 4.8.05 Maximum Site Coverage. No maximum site coverage shall be required in this District. 4.8.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be fifteen (15) feet; Exception: Parcels fronting on Fifth and Third Streets may be reduced to five (5) feet and parcels fronting on Main Street must develop within (5) feet of the property line. *Note: The build-to requirement can be satisfied by extending any of the following to within five (5) feet of the property line: 1) the facade of the ground floor level; 2) a plaza or patio used for open-air commercial activity; 3) a low-wall or fence (not exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height), planters or other architectural features, which extend along at least fifty (50)percent of the frontage along the lot line; 4) two(2) side walls and second story facade. Note: The following may be permitted in the front yard setback on Fifth Street, Third Street and Main Street: benches, bicycle racks, transparent wind screens and open--air commercial facilities. 4.8.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Interior yard requirements, for residential development, shall be ten (10) feet; non residential may be reduced to zero. (b) Exterior yards require not less than fifteen(15) feet, from a public ROW(corner lots). Downtown Specific Plan -43- (1913D) 4.8.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to widen the alley to fhItf#(30) twenty-four(24) feet. 4.8.09 Setback W=r Storv). The covered portions of all stories above the second shall be set back twenty-five (25) feet from the ultimate ROW. 4.8.10 Qpen Space. Parcels having one hundred (100) feet or more of street frontage, within this District shall provide a public open space amenity. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the net site area must be provided for such a purpose, in all non-residential development. Exception: Mixed use developments which include residential units, may reduce the public open space to five (5) percent of the net site area. Full block developments on Main Street require public plazas. These street level public plazas shall be incorporated into the design of the development and approved by the Director. Downtown Specific Plan -44- (1913D) c ' 4.9 DISTRICT #7: VISITOR-SERVING COMMERCIAL Purpose. This District extends southeast of the Downtown core adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway. The principal purpose of this District is to provide commercial facilities to serve seasonal visitors to the beaches as well as to serve local residents on a year round basis. This District also provides a continuous commerical link between,the Downtown and the visitor-commercial/recreation District near Beach Boulevard. Boundaries. District #7 extends from ZIM 1st Street to Huntington Avenue between PCH and the proposed Walnut Avenue extension. Downtown Specific Plan -45- (1913D) i 4.9.01 Permitted Uses. (a) New construction and establishment of the following uses in District #7 ih&U/tW0bbVALtW may be allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Change of use shall be subject to the approval of the Director. A. Antique stores Art gallery B. Bakeries (No more than seven (7) employees) Banks and savings and loans branch offices (not to exceed five-thousand (5,000) square feet) Barber, beauty, manicure shops Beach, swimming and surfing equipment Bicycle sales, rental and repair Boat and marine supplies Bookstores Botanical Gardens Boutiques C. Clothing stores Coin, stamp and art dealers Confectioners Curio shops D. Delicatessens F. Florists Fruit and vegetable stores G. Game Stores Gifts and party shops Groceries (convenience) I. Ice cream parlors J. Jewelry stores L. Laundromats M. Marine insurance Meat or fish markets N. Newspaper and magazine stores Newstands Novelties P. Photographic studios Photographic equipment sales Photographic processing (no more than one (1) developing machine) Professional Office (not to exceed fifty [50] percent of total floor area) Downtown Specific Plan -46- (1913D) S. Shoe stores Sporting goods T. Tourist related public and semi—public buildings, services and facilities Travel agency Y. Yacht sales (display only) Note: Visiter—serving commercial uses must be a part of all development proposals in this District, with a minimum requirement that the entire street level,be devoted to Visitor—Serving Commercial Uses. (b) New construction, establishment, or a change to the following uses in District #7 may be O&i AUM allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit: A. Arcades Automobile service stations C. Cabarets D. Dance halls and discos Dancing and/or live entertainment as a primary or accessory use H. Health and sports clubs Hotels and motels L. Liquor stores P. Permanent parking lots and parking structures R. Reducing salon Restaurants Retail sales, outdoor T. Taverns 4.9.02 Minimum Parcel Size. No minimum parcel size shall be required for this District. However, prior to the approval of any development, a master site plan for the entire District shall be approved by the Planning Commission. Development which is in conformance with the site plan may then be permitted. 4.9.03 Maximum Densitv/Intensity, TiH�/fif��EdlSclS/fi�i�tbf/B�h1�.16f�i�t/s'MI Wba'l iML,' 'byktbbVkVL'iVtA d61(FMRYIbVAhWD'rSrtihfbVJ1ThWkI6(JV&W'A E.�Lb(tl�alt��d/6K,�b6f��la'�f��l�l�(�t'hhl�t/t�bf�/t�(�'Lf�iti�+�66N��/vbl�y/!ib't tAVAIWyd dW MykU&AW;! (a) The maximum floor area for developments in this District shall be calculated with a multiple of 3.0. Downtown Specific Plan —47— (1913D) 4.9.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be eight (8) stories. 4.9.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. 4.9.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be fifty (50) feet from PCH. 4.9.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum exterior side yard requirement shall be twenty (20) feet. 4.9.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet from the proposed Walnut Avenue extension. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to provide for the Walnut Avenue extension. 4.9.09 Setback (Upper St=). No upper story setback shall be required in this District. 4.9.10 Open Space. A public open space and/or pedestrian access amenity, subject to approval of the Director, may be required for development projects in order to assure a predominantly visitor-serving orientation. 4.9.11 Corridor Dedication. Development in District #7 shall require the dedication of a twenty (20) foot corridor between Atlanta Avenue and PCH for public access between the southern end of the Pacific Electric ROW and PCH. This requirement may be waived if an alternative public amenity is provided or if the corridor is deemed unnecessary by the City. Any proposal for an alternative public amenity must be approved by the Planning Commission. 4.9.12 Mobilehome District. A portion of District #7 is zoned for mobilehome use. Within this mobilehome area, the provisions of the Mobilehome District of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall apply (See Section 4.16). The Mobilehome Overlay may only be removed as set forth in the Specific Plan subject to compliance with the provisions of the Mobilehome Overlay Zones/Removal/Rezoning/Change of Use Article of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. h _ �V Downtown Specific Plan -48- (1913D) 4.10 DISTRICT #8• - HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Pose. This District is intended to allow high density residential uses. New residential development will provide a population base to help support the commercial and office uses in the Downtown area. Boundaries. District #8 includes two consolidated parcels; one parcel is bounded on the north by Atlanta Avenue, on the east by Huntington Street, on the south by the proposed Walnut Extension and on the west by Lake Street. The second includes the area north of the proposed Walnut Avenue extension between Huntington Street and Beach Boulevard. 4.10.01 Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted in District #8 subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. These uses shall be limited to permanently attached residential uses; including multi-family housing, condominiums, stock-cooperatives or apartments. �3 Downtown Specific Plan -49- (1913D) , 4.10.02 Minimum Parcel Size. No minimum parcel size shall be required in this District. However, prior to approval of any development, a conceptual plan for Subarea a or Subarea b shall be approved by the Planning Commission. Development which is in conformance with the site plan may then be permitted. 4.10.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units shall be thirty-five (35) units per gtb§§ net acre. 4.10.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be fifty (SM/ft& four (4) stories. 4.10.05 Maximum Site Coveragg. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of net site area. 4.10.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be twenty (20) feet. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to provide for the Walnut Avenue extension. 4.10.07 Setback (Side Yard). The-minimum exterior side yard requirement shall be twenty (20) feet. Exception: The minimum exterior yard requirement from Beach Boulevard shall be twenty-five (25) feet. 4.10.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet. 4.10.09 Setback (Upper Story). That portion of structures which exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from the northern exterior property line. 4.10.10 Qpen Space. No public open space shall be required in this District. 4.10.11 Corridor Dedication. Development in District #8 shall require the dedication of a twenty (20) foot corridor between Atlanta Avenue and PCH for public access between the southern end of the Pacific Electric ROW and PCH. This requirement may be waived if an alternative public amenity is provided or if the corridor is deemed unnecessary by the City. Any proposal for an alternative public amenity must be approved by the Planning Commission. 4.10.12 Resource Production Overlay. A portion of District #8 is designated with an oil suffix (0,01). Within this area all the requirements of the Resource Production Overlay shall apply (see Section 4.14). 4.10.13 Conservation Overlay. A portion of District #8 has been designated with a conservation overlay. Within this area all requirements of the Conservation Overlay shall apply (see Section 4.15). Downtown Specific Plan -50- (1913D) 4.10.14 Mobilehome District. A portion of District #8 is zoned for mobilehome use. Within this mobilehome zoning area, the provisions of the Mobilehome District of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall apply (see Section 4.16). doe Downtown Specific Plan -51- (1913D) i 4.11 DISTRICT #9 .-DMMERCIAL/RECREATION Pulse. The purpose of this District is to encourage large, coordinated development that is beach-oriented and open to the public for both commercial and recreational purposes. Boundaries. District #9 is bounded by PCH on the south, Beach Boulevard on the east, Huntington Street on the west, and or :orth by the proposed Walnut Avenue extension. Downtown Specific Plan -52- (1913D) i 4.11.01 Permitted Uses. The following uses and structures ftM1 &66bVAk4AU may be allowed in District #9 are subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. These commercial uses include hotels, motels, restaurants and recreational facilities. 4.11.02 Minimum Parcel Size. No minimum parcel size shall be required for this District. However, prior to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission for any development, a master site plan for the entire _ District shall be approved by the Planning Commission. Development which is in conformance with the site plan may then be permitted. 4.11.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum intensity of development shall be calculated by floor area ratio (FAR) for this District. The floor area ratio shall apply to the entire project area. Floor area ratios shall be calculated on net acreage. (a) The maximum floor area for developments in this District shall be calculated with a multiple of 3.5. 4.11.04 Maximum Building Height. No maximum building height shall be required. 4.11.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage shall be thirty—five (35) percent of the net site area. Note: A maximum of twenty—five (25) percent of the net site area can be used for parking and vehicular accessways. 4.11.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty—two (42) inches in height shall be fifty (50) feet, from PCH and Beach Boulevard. 4.11.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum exterior side yard requirement shall be twenty (20) feet. Exception: The minimum exterior yard requirement from Beach Boulevard shall be fifty (50) feet. 4.11.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to provide for the Walnut Avenue extension. 4.11.09 Setback (Upper Story). No upper story setback shall be required. ,r Downtown Specific Plan —53— (1913D) 4.11.10 Qnen Space. Development projects within this District shall provide a public open space amenity. A minimum of twenty-five (25) percent of the net site area must be provided for such a purpose. This area should be available for public or semi-public uses for recreational purposes. Open space must have minimum dimensions of twenty-five (25) feet in each direction . Paved areas devoted to streets, driveways and parking areas may not be counted toward this requirement. A maximum of fifteen (15) percent of the required twenty-five (25) percent may be enclosed recreation space such as gyms, _ handball courts, health clubs, interpretive centers or similar facilities. A fee may be imposed for the use of such facilities. 4.11.11 Pedestrian Overpass. A pedestrian overpass may be required to connect the development in this District to the City Beach, as a condition of approval for any new development on, or further subdivision of, parcels within the District. The City may waive this requirement if the City determines that overpasses are unnecessary or impractical considering the type and design of new developments. 4.11.12 Mobilehome District. A portion of District #9 is zoned for mobilehome use. Within this mobilehome area, the provisions of the Mobilehome District of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall apply (see Section 4.16). Downtown Specific Plan -54- (1913D) 4.12 DISTRICT #10: PIER-RELATED COMMERCIAL PurMse. This District is intended to provide for commercial uses on and alongside the pier which will enhance and expand the public's use and enjoyment of this area. Uses are encouraged which capitalize on the views available from the pier and the unique recreational or educational opportunities it affords. At the same time, care must be exercised to insure that the major portion of the pier will remain accessible to the public at no charge, for strolling, fishing or observation. ti5ft�/(��J/9��if/6H�fh�iMdttl'�W�t/ttd�/�hH'�EI�l14ir�1dt�,�Nd/t�vty�vityi�,�� (Y26YfMVbff/WNd 2 ft/5iKd/df/t�M�J 1 aS�NJ/M�ddtSbU�E3�d/h+i/t�f� Drr§biyfbb,If/�/sit'��ffllbfid/fildt�I/PQH/tbf/b5fd/sl�ti8',/ �fddtS��btit'bf�bf fWt4W &)VdW&bWdt/IMhWt'MWdit/df/t�bf�l�it�t/tNS�Vdt If&bf dt! Boundaries. Shall be consistent with the Coastal Element of the General Plan. Downtown Specific Plan -55- (1913D) 4.12.01 Permitted Uses. New construction and establishment of the foIIowing uses may be 06irifAL4W allowed in District #10 subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: Note: Only parking uses are permitted in this District northwest of Sixth Street. 4.12.02 Minimum Parcel Size. No minimum parcel size shall be required in this District. 4.12.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. No maximum density or intensity requirement shall be applied in this District. 4.12.04 Maximum Height. The maximum building heights shall be twenty-five (25) feet and no more than two (2) stories above the pier level. Exception: The maximum building height on the pier (excluding the end of the pier cafe) and northwest of the pier shall be one (1) story. No maximum building height shall be required for lifeguard towers or other facilities necessary for public safety. No parking surface or structure shall exceed the adjacent elevation of PCH. 4.12.05 Maximum Site Coveraee. No maximum site coverage shall be required. Exception: No more than twenty-five (25) percent of the pier shall be covered by any building or roofed structure. In addition, buildings or other roofed structures shall not be constructed along more than twenty-five (25) percent of the perimeter of the pier. 4.12.06 Setback (Front Yard). No minimum front yard setback shall be required. 4.12.07 Setback (Side Yard). No minimum side yard setback shall be required. 4.12.08 Setback (Rear Yard). No minimum rear yard setback shall be required. 4.12.09 Setback (Upper Story). No minimum upper story setback shall be required. 4.12.10 Open Space. Public open space and pedestrian access shall be major considerations of development in this District. All new development shall provide sufficient clear width along the length of the pier for public access, emergency and service vehicles. In addition, public walkways along the pier edge or around the perimeter of new development must be provided. Downtown Specific Plan -56- (1913D) 4.13 DISTRICT #11: BEACH OPEN SPACE Purpose. This District is intended to preserve and protect the sandy beach area within the Downtown Specific Plan boundaries while allowing parking and auxilliary beach-related commercial and convenience uses. Approximately half of the beach frontage in the District is City beach; the remainder is owned by the State of California. Boundaries. District #11 is bounded by PCH on one side and the Pacific Ocean on the other. The District extends from Goldenwest Street to Beach Boulevard, except for the area which is part of District #10. � I Downtown Specific Plan -57- (1913D) 4.13.01 Permitted Uses. New construction and establishment of the following uses in District #11 0M11W06blofAUW may be allowed subject to approval of the Design Review Board. Access facilities • Basketball Courts Beach concession stands* Bicycle trails and support facilities • Fire rings Paddleboard courts Parking lots that will not result in the loss of recreational sand area. Tiered parking is permitted within the Downtown Specific Plan area on existing lots seaward of Pacific Coast Highway provided the parking is designed so that the top of the structures including walls, etc., are located a minimum of one foot below the maximum height of the adjacent bluff. Park offices + playground equipment Public restrooms Public transit facilities and associated structures, dressing rooms or showers** Shoreline construction that may alter natural shoreline process, such as groins, cliff retaining walls, pipelines, outfalls that are designed to eliminate adverse impacts on local shoreline sand su pply • Trails (bicycle or jogging) and support facilities • Volleyball net supports *Note: Beach concession stands shall be limited to twenty-five hundred (2500) square feet and spaced at intervals no closer than one thousand (1,000) feet. Beach concession structures shall be located within or immediately adjacent to paved parking or access areas. **Note: Public transit facilities may only be constructed within the existing paved parking areas or in areas which are not part of the beach. 4.13.02 Minimum Parcel Size. No minimum parcel size shall be required . 4.13.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. No maximum density or intensity requirement shall be applied in this District. 4.13.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building heights shall be limited to twenty (20) feet. Exceptions: No maximum building height shall be required for lifeguard towers or other facilities necessary for public safety. No parking surface or structure shall exceed the adjacent elevation of PCH. Downtown Specific Plan -58- (1913D) 4.13.05 Maximum Site Coverage. No maximum site coverage shall be required. 4.13.06 Setback (Front Yard). No minimum front yard setback shall be required. 4.13.07 Setback (Side Yard). No minimum side yard setback shall be required. 4.13.08 Setback (Rear Yard). No minimum rear yard setback shall be required . 4.13.09 Setback (Upper Story). No minimum upper story setback shall be required. 4.13.10 Open Space. Public open space and pedestrian access shall be major considerations of development in this District. 4.13.11 Parkin . No additional parking shall be required for new development in this District. Construction which proposes the removal of existing parking, shall provide for the replacement of that parking on a one—for—one basis within the District. 4.13.12 Resource Production Overlay. A portion of District *11 is designated with an Oil Suffix (0,01). Within this area, all the requirements of the Resource Production Overlay shall apply (see Section 4.14). Downtown Specific Plan —59— (1913D) Downtown Specific Plan -60- (1913D) OIL DISTRICT OVERLAY MAP N Figure 4.14 G7 Downtown Specific Plan -61- (1913D) 4.14 RESOURCE PRODUCTION OVERLAY Purpose. The Downtown Specific Plan area overl;-s long-poductive oil pools. Many facilities are still operating because the extent of the remaining reserves, therefore oil production will continue to be permitted in parts of this area. The City provides for oil facilities by designating oil "suffix" zoning Districts in conjection with an underlying base zone such as a commercial or residential District. Both oil facilities allowed by suffix and the other uses allowed by the base zone are permitted. Currently, the City has two oil suffixes the "0" which allows existing oil wells and attendant facilities but no new wells, ant the "01" which allows the drilling of new wells in addition to all uses in the "0" District. These suffixes, with certain modifications, are also employed in this Specific Plan. In addition tc a oil suffixes three Resource Production Overlays have been identific:.. Existing and/or expanded oil production may continue in these areas provided that the additional conditions outlined in this subsection are met. 4.14.01 Oil Overlay "A" The regulations in this overlay District facilitate continued oil recovery, but require all new facilities to be concentrated into a screened, soundproofec and landscaped expansion of the existing oil site and encourage the expeditious re^ioval of existing wells from oil overlay 'B". Boundaries. Oil overlay "A" includes an existing oil island located in District #2, between 19th and 18th streets from Pacific Coast Highway to the area is Walnut Avenue. Regulations. New wells and related facilities shall be permitted in accordance with the -01 suffix and related provisions in the the Huntington Beach Ordiance Code provided, however, that th_ =ollowing additional conditions are met: (a) Any new well must be part of a secondary or other enhanced oil recovery project of used as a replacement of an existing well. (b) A schec r. for abandonment of all wells operated by the project proponent which are located within Bolsa Chica State Beach shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Development Services prior to the drilling of any new well. This schedule may be amended t �� at the discretion of the Director of Development Services. o Downtown Specific Plan -62- (1913D) (c) The project proponent shall agree to a memorandum of understanding with the City as a condition for approval, stating that no new wells shall be drilled by that company on Bolsa Chica State Beach (oil overlay "B") nor shall the existing wells be redrilled except, in such cases where: 1) the redrilled well will be produced by a "subsurface" or "down-hole" pump, only, or 2) the redrilled well will be produced by other new technology with fewer visual and environmental impacts than a conventional ball and plunger, pump, or 3) an intensified screening plan is approved the the Director of Development Services which substantially improves the appearance of the area. (d) The operation site hall be screened by a wall, fence, or structure in keeping with the character of the area. The site shall also be landscaped so as to ensure visual compatibility with the surriounding area. A screening and landscaping plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director. All structures shall generally conform to the height limits and setback requirements of the base District. The Director may waive these restriction if it would result in better overall soundproffing, odor reduction and/or visual compatibility. 4.14.02 Oil Overlay "B" The regulations in this overlay faciliate continued oil recovery, wells may be redrilled if surface pumping units are replaced with a subsurface ones. Drilling of new wells may be permitted but only if the result is a significate reduction in the amount of space used for oil operations on the beach. Boundaries. Oil overlay "B" comprises a section of Bolsa Chica State Beach currently in oil productiion in District #11 between Goldenwest and llth streets. Regulations. Wells may be redrilled in accordance with the -0 suffix in the Huntington Beach Ordiance Code provided, however, that the following additional conditions are met: (a) The operator submits a report to the Department of Development Services explaning why there is no other feasible, environmentally less damaging inland site (such a report must be approved by the Director); or agrees to a memorandum of understanding with the City stating that the redrilled well will be produced by a subsurface or down-hole pump or other new technology with fewer visual and environmental impacts than a conventional ball and plunger pump. (b) A schedule for abandonment of all wells operated by the project proponent which are located within Bolsa Chica State Beach shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Development Services prior to the drilling of any new well. This schedule may be amended at the discretion of the Director of Development Services. (c) All redrilling operations shall be limited to a period from October 1 to May 31, except for emergencies for which the Fire Chief may waive these seasonal restrictions, but shall require soundproffing in accordance with Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. Downtown Specific Plan -63- (1913D) ' New wells may be permitted if they are part of an overall consolidation plan which significantly reduces the area used for oil facilities or expedites the removal of existing oil facilities within the overlay area. A consolidation plan must be submitted to the Director of Development Services for approval before a permit for drilling any new well will be issued. All drilling operations must be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the 01 suffix in the Huntington Beach Ordiance Code. 4.14.03 Oil Overlay "C" The regulations in the overlay facilitate continued oil recovery and provides for future oil production needs. Boundaries. Oil overlay "C" is an irregularly shaped site in District #8A between Lake Street and Huntington Avenue and Atlanta Avenue. Regulations. Well drilling and redrilling shall be permitted in accordance with Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and with the 0 or 01 suffix and related provisions in the Huntington Beach Ordiance Code. A conceptual site plan for the entire overlay area must be submitted prior to permitting any project development or subdivision of land within the overlay. The plan shall include at least one (1) oil island of not less than two (2) acres in size for new oil well drilling and oil production. Such island(s) shall be incorporated into the overall development plan so that noise, odor and visual impacts on the residences are minimized, and safe access to the oil site(s) is provided. Findings that at least one such island so designed is incorporated into the plan shall be made by the Planning Commission before approving any development project. Downtown Specific Plan -64- (1913D) 4.15 CONSERVATION OVERLAY Pufpse. The conservation overlay is intended to regulate those areas which have been preliminarily identified as wetlands. Upon determination by the California Department of Fish and Game that an area is classified as a wetland the conditions of this overlay shall apply Boundary. The State Department of Fish and Game has identified an area within District 8B as containing .8 acres of existing wetland and 1.4 acres of restorable wetland. The•2.2 acre area is immediately adjacent to Beach Boulevard (see Figure 4.14). Regulations. Development shall be permitted only pursuant to an overall development plan for the entire overlay area and subject to the following: • as a condition of any development on this parcel, topographic, vegetation, and soils information identifying the extent of any existing wetlands shall be submitted to the Director. The information shall be prepared by a qualified professional, and shall be subject to review by the California Department of Fish and Game. If any wetland is determined by the Department of Fish and Game to be severely degraded pursuant to Sections 30233 and 30411 of the California Coastal Act, or if it is less than one (1) acre in size, other restoration options may be undertaken, pursuant to the Coastal Commission's "Statewide Interpretive Guidelines for Wetlands and other Wet Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas." Conservation easements, dedications or other similar mechanisms shall be required over all wetland areas as a condition of development, to assure permanent protection. Public vehicular traffic shall be prohibited in wetland areas governed by a conservation easement. Specific drainage and erosion control requirements shall be incorporated into the project design to ensure that wetland areas are not adversely affected. No further subdivision of any parcel shall be permitted which would have the effect of dividing off environmentally sensitive habitat from other portions of such parcels for which urban uses are permitted in the City's Coastal Element until such time as the permanent protection of any wetland is assured. Within areas identified as wetlands in the coastal zone, the uses of the Coastal Conservation District shall supercede the uses of the FP1 and FP2 district. Downtown Specific Plan -65- (1913D) CONSERVATION OVERLAY MAP Figure 4.15 Downtown Specific Plan -66- (1913D) 4.16 MOBILEHOME DISTRICT PPu=se. The Downtown Specific Plan includes approximately 24 acres with a Mobilehome District (MH) designation. The purpose of the Mobilehome District is to permit present mobilehome park uses to continue. These mobilehome areas fall within Districts Seven, Eight and Nine of the Downtown Specific Plan. Boundaries. The Mobilehome District encompasses parts of Districts 7, 8 and 9. The following describes the real property in two sections. Section One is approximately 6.2 acres in size located on the north side of Pacific Coast Highway between Huntington and Lake Streets. That portion of fractional Section 14, Township 6 South, Range 11 West in the Rancho Las Bolsas, City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, page 14 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Lake Street (formerly First Street) being parallel with and 37.50 feet southeasterly measured 147 feet right angles from the northwesterly line of Block 101 with the north right-of-way line of Pacific Coast Highway (formerly Ocean Avenue), also being the southeasterly extension of the southwesterly line of Block No. 101, all as shown on a map of Huntington Beach, recorded in Book 3, page 36 of Mescellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county; thence south 41°38'18" west 53.00 feet along the centerline of Lake Street to the construction centerline of Pacific Coast Highway; thence along said construction centerline the following, south 4838'18" west 53.00 feet along the centerline of Lake Street to the construction centerline of Pacific Coast Highway; thence along said construction centerline the following, south 48'21'42" east 98.26 feet to a curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 1200 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 4°55'28" an arc distance of 103.14 feet; thence south 53*17'11" east 108.26 feet to a curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 3328.60 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 1*20'17" an arc distance of 77.72 feet; thence south 54°37'28" east 400.00 feet; thence leaving said construction centerline north 35°22'32" east 52.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence south 54°37'28" east 427.26 feet; thence south 59015'30" east 263.04 feet to the southwesterly extension of the westerly line of Huntington Street; thence 37*54'51" east 290.61 feet along said extension and said westerly line; thence north 54*05109" west ' II Downtown Specific Plan -67- (1913D) j Figure 4.16 Downtown Specific Plan -68- (19I3D) i 520.00 feet; thence south 5054'51" west 120 feet; thence south 57°32'32" west 55.85 feet; thence north 57005'09" west 70.00 feet; thence north 12005'09" west 120.00 feet; thence north 35054'51" east 130.00 feet; thence north 54'05'09" west 170.00 feet; thence south 35*54'51" west 80.00 feet; thence north 89°05'09" west 70.00 feet; thence south 00*54'51" west 170.00 feet; thence south 80005'09" east 83.83 feet; thence south 35°22'32" west 157.67 feet to the true point of beginning. Section Two is approximately 18 acres in size located on the west side of Beach Boulevard north of Pacific Coast Highway. Beginning at the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 14; thence south 89°43'00" west 111.91 feet along the north line of the south half of the northeast quarter of said section to the true point of beginning; thence south 3029'43" west 593.12 feet; thence south 25*32'14" west 386.94 feet; thence south 11044'36" east 771.48 feet; thence south 80*00'00" west 82.75 feet; thence north 52'00'00" west 835.00 feet; thence north 38°00'00" east 300.00 feet; thence north 50*08113" west 173.58 feet; thence north 45'00'00" east 84.85 feet to point "A" (to be used as a reference for the exception portion of this description); thence north 43*17155" west 714.49 feet; thence due west 40.00 feet; thence south 49°45'49" west 170.29 feet; thence north 74028'33" west 186.82 feet; thence north 51'45158" west 420.51 feet; thence north 0017'36" east 59.76 feet to the north line of the south half of the northeast quarter of said section; thence north 89°43'00" east 1,844.00 feet along said north line to the true point of beginning. Excepting therefrom the following: beginning at said Point "A", thence north 45000'00" east 190.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north 43*17'55" west 550.00 feet; thence (north 89*43'00" east 640.00 feet; thence south 3'29'43" west 254.03 feet; thence south 25'32'14" west 303.23 feet; thence north 43017'55" west 170.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Regulations. The regulations of the Downtown Specific Plan will serve as overlays for those portions of Districts Seven, Eight and Nine which retain the (MH) zone, until such time that the Mobilehome District designation is removed. All areas retaining the (MH) zone shall be subject to the provisions of the Mobilehome District of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. In addition, these areas are subject to the provisions of the Mobilehome Overlay Zones/Removal/Rezoning/Change of Use Article of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. �3 Downtown Specific Plan -69- (1913D) • DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DOWNTOWN HISTORY/OVERVIEW II. DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN REWRITE - RCA III. ANNOTATED CHANGES TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN IV. PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN/WITH NEW MAPS V. DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN VI. LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC VII. DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES DOWNTOWN HISTORY/OVERVIEW The City of Huntington Beach has a well established potential for development. The City is located within minutes of Long Beach, Newport Beach, Irvine, and Costa Mesa, areas which have experienced a great deal of change in the past few years . This location means the City shares a sub-regional market with portions of both Los Angeles and Orange Counties . The Huntington Beach Downtown area has been the subject of many special plans and studies over the past three decades . The area has a variety of residential, commercial, and recreational uses surrounding an older Downtown core with the Municipal pier serving as the focal point . Huntington Beach has miles of prime public ocean frontage, with numerous vacant and under-utilized parcels across from the beach. The potential development sites in the Downtown are sizable and attractive and present various opportunities for consideration. The City recognizes that market demand will exert pressures for the future development of these parcels . the City must respond to these demands in a manner which will achieve the optimum potential while at the same time protecting the existing character of the neighborhoods . The purpose of the downtown Master Plan is to encourage the revitalization of this important area of Huntington Beach. The Plan promotes a mix of commercial, residential, and recreational uses which will be able to take advantage of the area ' s proximity to the ocean. The principal goal of the Downtown Master Plan is to establish a framework for the physical improvements, both public and private, which will create an attractive, unique, vibrant and viable community that will make people want to live, work and play in Huntington Beach. The last plan for downtown Huntington Beach was completed and adopted in 1986 . The plan was prepared by city staff and 3D International architects and planners. The Plan was flexible enough to accommodate over one million square feet of commercial acitivity. Since that time may changes have taken place in the downtown area. Numerous redevelopment projects have been completed and still others have been approved but yet to be constructed. In addition, the City has begun major public infrastructure improvements, including street widening, sidewalk improvements, street lighting, utility relocation and upgrading . In addition to the commercial projects approved or built, numerous residential projects have been built in the downtown area over the past 10 years totaling approximately 2, 000 additional units . Due to the growing interest in the development of the downtown area and the intensity of the approved downtown development projects, the emphasis on scale of development shifted to a less intense "Village Concept" . This approach is intended to create a more pedestrian oriented environment. The "Village Concept" will allow for flexibility in the ratio of residential to commercial uses while maintaining the integrity of the commercial street frontage. The overall intended result is to reduce the size of building mass in height and volume and limit the intensity of commercial and residential acitivity. This plan has received a great deal of public review during the past year. The major question to be addressed is how can the City successfully transition from very ambitious expectations to the development realities of the 1990 ' s . i -2- (7328d) REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date 1993 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Development Subject: CODE AMENDMENT NO. 92-5/DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN REWRITE "VILLAGE CONCEPT" AND PARKING CONCEPT Consistent with Council Policy? Y 1 Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE• Transmitted for City Council consideration is Code Amendment No. 92-5 the Downtown Specific Plan rewrite commonly referred to as the "Village Concept" and Parking Master Plan. On July 7, 1993 the Planning Commission approved Code Amendment No. 92-5 with the Parking Master Plan and recommended its adoption to the City Council RECOMMENDATION. Motion to: "Approve Code Amendment No. 92-5 the Downtown Specific Plan rewrite and the Downtown Parking Master Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. " ANALYSIS: History In February, 1991, the Department of Community Development submitted a Downtown Master Plan concept paper to the City Council for discussion. A series of study sessions were then held with the Planning Commission and City Council to solicit input and receive direction on the potential changes to the Downtown Specific Plan. On May 20, 1991, the City council directed staff to prepare a code amendment that would implement the changes that would result in the "Village Concept" . In the period just prior to these meetings, the Main Piet Phase II project (Abdelmuti) transitioned from the discussion stage to the negotiation stage (December, 1990) . It became evident at that point that on-site parking would not be accommodated in the Abdelmuti phase of Main Pier Phase II . This discussion became the genesis for the Downtown Parking Master Plan which is the subject of another report . NO 5/85 In September, 1992, the Planning Commission conducted their first hearing on the Downtown Specific Plan. In the course of the next ten (10) months the Planning Commission held eleven (11) public hearings, sponsored two (2) public workshops at the art center and received feedback from three (3) chamber of commerce meetings attended by staff. Due to the extensive public review process, the Downtown Specific Plan update has been significantly modified from its original presentation. On October 24, 1992, the staff presented the Downtown Specific Plan to an Urban Land Institute Plan Analysis session at their national conference. A team composed of economists, developers, architects, city planners, and market research experts from around the country evaluated the City of Huntington Beach draft Downtown Specific Plan. The Committee did not reach a consensus as to the specifics of our plan but did agree we were headed in the right direction. They believed that a mixed use concept that is pedestrian oriented and supported by residential development could be successful . However, the Urban Land Institute strongly recommended that the Redevelopment Agency should first acquire all the property necessary before commencing with a project. The Village Concept The Downtown Master Plan emphasizes the ocean, ocean activities, forms, shapes and colors . The Downtown Master design concept must concentrate on the City pier, realizing that all other areas within the Downtown are linked either directly or indirectly to the pier. The level of energy and excitement generated at the pier-head area needs to be capitalized upon and spread throughout the Downtown core. The pier area has the potential to accommodate a great deal of activity by offering a variety of uses and services . However, developments at the pier should also be scaled to a pedestrian level with passive activities given equal consideration with more vigorous activities . Pedestrian boardwalks on various levels and the pier itself will offer views of the ocean and ocean activities . The overall form and shape of all development in Downtown Huntington Beach should allow people to see the ocean from as many places as possible. The pier area will continue to serve as the major attraction in the City and should become the major activity node for the Downtown area . The Master Plan identifies the pier-head and the area immediately across Pacific Coast Highway from the pier as the focus for the greatest intensity of future activity and development . The interdependence of public and private development activities can create this major activity node at the pier-head. RCA - 9/7/93 -2- (7320d) It is important to emphasize the development of this node and encourage this activity to extend up Main Street inland from the ocean and to encourage pedestrian movement along the street. By expanding this activity from the pier, the commercial core along Main Street can become a lively shopping thoroughfare oriented to pedestrians and offering opportunities to shop, dine or browse in an ocean-related atmosphere. There has been some confusion as to how the village concept is defined. The definitions that are available in the literature are abundant and diverse. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) has identified seven principles which help to create a village. Principle No. 1 - Promote Diversity of Use The basic objective in revitalizing the downtown economy is to attract more people more frequently and hold them as long as possible by creating a variety of reasons to come and to stay. Principle No. 2 - Emphasize Compactness The downtown should be compact and walkable, with a tight physical structure and an efficient spacing arrangement . Principle No. 3 - Foster Intensity Development densities should establish downtown as the community' s central place. But care is required to ensure that new large scale projects do not overwhelm Downtown's existing character or market potential . Principle No. 4 - Ensure Balance Day and evening as well as weekday and weekend activity generators should be interspersed to capitalize on the full economic development potential of a multi-use approach. Principle No. 5 - Provide Accessibilitv A clear emphasis on pedestrian use must be established in the downtown core if walking and street activity are to be encouraged. A positive balance between vehicular and pedestrian use of the street must be established. RCA - 9/7/93 -3- (7320d) Principle No. 6 - Create Functional Linkages People must be able to walk between activity centers . Pedestrian connections should link the Downtown' s major anchors and should connect the core area with adjacent neighborhoods . Principle No. 7 - Build a Positive Identity Retailing, culture, entertainment, recreation and special events programming, create an identity for a downtown. The question which is raised after examining these principles is how do they translate into practical development standards which accurately reflect a village concept for Huntington Beach. The seven principles above apply to almost any successful downtown. The key to a village concept is to achieve them in a less intense, less urban atmosphere, with a greater sense of pedestrian scale. Within these parameters we recognized the need to find a balance between competing forces which influence the type of development proposed. The intent in recommending the changes has always been protecting and serving residential neighborhoods, while still allowing for the expansion of visitor/tourist activities . We also recognized the need to develop both a nighttime and daytime population that thrives during all seasons of the year. Significant Changes . During the course of the ten (10) month public hearing process, the Planning Commission approved key changes to the Downtown Specific Plan. The majority of these changes are endorsed by staff. However, there are some changes that we believe need to be re-examined by the City Council before final approval of the code amendment . The areas where we disagree with the Planning Commission will be discussed later in this report. The following is a summary of the most significant changes proposed: CURRENT DOWNTOWN PROPOSED CHANGES APPROVED SPECIFIC PLAN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Density Calculations Based on Gross Site Area Net Site Area *Alley Widths 30 feet 24 feet RCA - 9/7/93 -4- (7320d) f - CURRENT DOWNTOWN PROPOSED CHANGES APPROVED SPECIFIC PLAN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Height Max. 8 stories 4 stories in certain districts Min. Parcel Size 5,000 - 10, 000 sf 2, 500 sf in all districts depending on district Floor Area Ratios Max. 3 . 5 in certain 3 .0 max. districts Boundary Changes District 1 - between 6th-9th Streets will allow commercial activity. This boundary change requires a Coastal Element Amendment. District 4 - Amended to include Walnut to Orange between 5th Street and Alley now becomes part of District 5. District 6 - Residential permitted on 3rd and Lake Streets . *Landscaping Requires greater number of trees that are smaller in size. Lot Consolidation Provides density and Minimizes incentives for height bonus for larger lot consolidation parcels New Provisions - Incentives for Affordable Housing Recognition of historic properties School mitigation impact provision *This denotes an area of disagreement with the Planning Commission RCA - 9/7/93 -5- (7320d) As discussed previously, there are minor areas of disagreement between the Planning Commission action and staff ' s recommendation. The first issue relates to alley width. Staff believes that a minimum of 28 feet is needed for a commercial alley to ensure adequate clearance for emergency vehicles (see Attachment No. 1) . The second area of disagreement involves the new landscaping provisions (4 .2 . 14) which requires a greater number of trees that are smaller in size. The Department of Public Works has prepared a comprehensive response to this proposed revision which is included as Attachment No. 2 . Conclusion The downtown area has long served as an area of mixed uses and activities . This area contains the City' s initial commercial core and the original residential neighborhoods; along with the recreational and oil production resources which have contributed to the City' s identity. The downtown is comprised of a number of very distinct areas . The transitional area surrounding the downtown core should ensure a gradual coordinated change in terms of heights, scale and uses, between Main Street and the adjacent residential areas . Main Street should continue to serve as a commercial core with an emphasis on retail activities, however, an option for office, residential or additional retail activities above the first floor can be allowed. This multi use aspect is intended to create a lively place to be day or night for both visitors and residents . Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway should maintain a pedestrian-oriented shopping street character. Commercial uses should be required on the ground floor with building fronts close to the sidewalk to establish a more intimate scale. In order to afford the visual, climatic and recreation amenities of this unique area to a greater number of people, medium residential densities should be provided. Offices should be encouraged to locate in this district in order to help establish the desired downtown atmosphere. The commercial emphasis on Main Street can be achieved with varying intensities, providing the commercial link between Orange Avenue and pier along Main Street is not broken at the pedestrian level . This district should encourage rehabilitation as well as new development. the larger scale new development should not detract from smaller infill projects, rehabilitation and new development should be scaled and designed with this intent . RCA - 9/7/93 -6- (7320d) I _ The Downtown Master Plan proposes to continue this combination of uses and activities with designations which provide for mixed-use activities . The mixed-use designation is intended to encourage but control a variety of uses. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Continue action on Code Amendment No. 92-5 and the Downtown Parking Master Plan until October 4, 1993 . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Diagram of Alley Widths 2. Public Works Comprehensive response to the proposed revision on landscaping provision 5.4 .2 . 14 MTU:MA:HZ:kjl RCA - 9/7/93 -7- (7320d) Z 'QN iN]NHOd11d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s r� air a M . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • . . . . • • . • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • •.•• ♦. • . • • - • • • . . • . • CO • . • • • . • • . • • • • • • • r• . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • ►�-1 �M N • • • . • • • r 4. . • . . . • • • • • a . . . . . . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • • • • f.� • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • . . . . . . • • • • • •-• • . . . . . • . . • • • • . • • • • . . . • . • . • • • . . . . . • • . • . . . . . 000000 . • . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x o n741 3 _ . . . . • . • • . • •. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . .'. . • • • . . . . . • . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • - - - - - . . . ... . • • 0 . 0 • . . . . 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: Howard Zelefsky, Director of Planning FROM: Daryl D. Smith, Superintendent, Park, Tree & Landscape DATE: August 16, 1993 SUBJECT: Downtown Specific Plan Code Amendment(Village Concept) I request your consideration of the following regarding the Planning Commission direction to staff to revise the tree planting size and number of trees required in the landscape section of the above subject code amendment which has been adopted and is now going to City Council for adoption. There is an assumption that fifteen (15) gallon trees will grow faster and bypass the box trees in a short period of time, therefore we've wasted the developers money and consequently the taxpayers money since the buyer pays the tree cost as part of the cost of the business or home when purchased from developer. A study by Gary Watson, found in the Journal of Arboriculture (February 1985, Vol. 11, No. 2) is often cited as evidence that small size trees grow faster than larger size trees. The fallacy is that Mr. Watson was comparing (balled/budaped and spade dug) trees in comparison to five (5) and fifteen (15) gallon containerized trees. Balled/budaped spade dug trees go through a sever shock and set back period and many times never recover to healthy growth because of root damage. Factually, all things being equal; same specie/variety, good healthy root system, healthy branch structure and proper propagation of tree, the smaller size tree will not grow larger or bypass the boxed tree if the boxed tree is planted properly. Young, vigorous trees, as well as young vigorous people, will normally grow faster than older more mature specimens. However, at a given point in life, rapid growth subsides and continues at typical intervals based on quality of maintenance provided. .ATTACHMENT N®.%••...., __ The elements necessary for containerized trees to reach box tree size is; proper pruning, proper fertilizingtwatering and general professional care during growth and finally planting. I do not believe that the general populous, i.e. homeowners, business owners or their gardeners are going to provide the required care a nursery provides when growing trees to be sold as boxed material. There are several reasons the City requires boxed trees to be planted in new developments. • When the City eliminated the three (3) and four(4) foot wide public parkway areas and required tree planting in private front yards or private property landscape planting areas, the City wanted value for loss of right-of-way, which became additional private property the developer could use in his project. Therefore, the City required a (36" boxed) tree in place of a (15 gallon) tree that had been planted in the public parkway. • City wanted a more mature street tree appearance in the residential neighborhoods, industrial areas and business areas since the trees were being planted six (6) to (10) feet further away from the street. • The environmental review process requires any mature trees removed shall be replaced with (36" boxed) trees, again the City did not want to wait, for 5 to 10 years for the appearance of mature tree, aesthetics and environmental benefits. The process requires these benefits now and a reasonable replacement value of large tree removal. Bottom line, I believe the City is correct in the existing requirements and there is substantial evidence of fact established by professionals in the field of horticulture to show that planting box tree specimens is sound practice as is now required by our Division 9 Code and in most other cities in Orange County or the State. We have attached an analysis of tree quantity/size comparisons relative to the various districts and the specific features of each district as it relates to landscape/tree planting areas provided. Should there be any questions on this matter I will be available at the Planning Commission meeting or you may call me. DDS:ss cc: Steve May, Principal Engineer DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TREE ANALYSIS The purpose of this analysis is to determine if the existing tree requirements and landscape design criteria as proposed in the Downtown Specific Plan and Division 9 rewrite are adequate for the downtown area and if modifying the tree requirements by changing from 1 - 36" box tree to 3 - 15 gal. trees is a viable alternative. For the purpose of this analysis the issue of 15 gal. vs. 36" box sized trees is put aside. The bottom line issue is trees and the quantity thereof to be planted in the remaining available planting areas of a given site. A tree is a tree regardless of the container it is planted in. The seed of a tree or a 180" box tree will at some point be a mature tree and the maturity of the required trees is the issue. Another document/report will address planted trees of varying sizes and their growth rates. This analysis is broken down by district - Examples (Districts 1 thru 8) and tries to determine based on the total building design criteria, what the minimum plantable area will be for a development in each district. Based on the design criteria and what has appeared in the field the analysis is correct. A tree planting, design criteria analysis has been provided for three general 9 Y P types of trees; small, medium and large. The criteria indicates the trees required/approximate and recommended minimum plantable root and canopy space which should allow each tree to grow to maturity without causing too much disruption/damage and thereby jeopardizing the tree's life span. Practically speaking a tree's life span is jeopardized by mutilation or by removal. Mutilation occurs when someone who has no idea how to properly trim trees is charged with recapturing a scenic view, creating a view corridor to business signage, keeping a tree from getting "too large", to stop roots from causing damage, etc.. Removal of trees occurs for the same reasons and also to remove and replace mutilated trees. Mutilation is caused by ignorance. Proper planning and design can eliminate both mutilation and removal by requiring that the proper trees be placed in appropriate locations. The specific plan should encourage the use of certain trees for certain areas and not require more trees than can adequately grow in a given space. General city wide mutilation of trees on private property could be minimized or eliminated by requiring that all tree trimmers who do work in the City of Huntington Beach be licensed and certified Arborist. 1 Trees have certain minimums that they require for growth. Among those minimums are air, water, warmth and nutrients which occur in the root zone. The root zone must be able to provide these items as well as allow the roots to get to them. The access the roots need is in the form of plantable area. The recommended minimum requirements for plantable root space are based upon the tree's size and are generalized as follows: TYPICAL TREE ROOT SPACE REQUIREMENTS 1. Small trees and large shrubs trained into tree forms Require 300 s.f.+ of growing area per tree to grow to maturity. 2. Medium sized trees Require 700 s.f.+ of growing area per tree to grow to maturity. 3. Large sized trees Require 1,000 s.f.+ of growing area per tree to grow to maturity. Refer to pages 15, 16 and 17 for examples and more information. Example No. 1 A commercial site in District No. 1 has a minimum lot size of 10,000 s.f. with 100' of street frontage. If the property faces a street other than P.C.H., there would be a 20' setback average to the building and therefore 2,000 s.f. maximum of root and canopy space for trees to be placed. The tree requirements are 1 tree per 45 I.f. of street frontage equating to 3 trees and on site trees at 1 tree per 1,500 s.f. or fraction thereof of building floor area. The maximum floor area on the first floor, (50% of site) is 5,000 s.f. equating to 4 on site trees. The total tree requirement is now seven (7) ea.. Note: If the building is taller than one story, additional square footage would then require additional trees further impacting the problem. The total plantable area (not considering hardscape area such as sidewalks and patios - an unknown area as it changes with each project) is 2,000 s.f. utilizing the tree root space requirements to select a tree would then lead to small trees or palms. Seven (7) small trees would need 2,100 + s.f. of root and canopy space to allow them to mature. Utilizing medium or large trees would be to say that sometime in the future the trees would have to be removed or drastically 2 �tPIL ��r�4 i.-T z � AF vv �. ` � :.♦ t',�f ,�r!R.I� �,�'LYrj.f�• a:yi� ,�t�, �' ,`'F t !M .,.I.r �t�.,+!.tf'"1�.7.tS•�!"�"I� tf') �( �f 4,�., ��yj,' "f. 21'. 1t'.,q:y..' 7i•{. +1f a.l. �. f`•, ;.t`•..\�,�.'_ '1 1 `vV+ •Y" ; t ; '�. �'•_ ',s ty'1479: ���!Yrr�•^'t Y "'a +r �' 1� stJ,�f/,� 1�<r�:.�:: .*t' •r-1•.. — - L�. ". ��13 I'•, , .,L`,1. �p. .{�:L. `�'.�• �� Jar M ,.�� r,' y.�l. dd '77 rn \ n trimmed (mutilated) because they would outgrow the spaces provided for them. To modify the tree requirements to 3 - 15 gal. trees for each 36" box tree would in essence triple the problem. There would still be 3 - street trees required but there would be 12 on site trees required for a total of 15 trees in 2,000 s.f. of plantable root and canopy space. This quantity of 15 small trees would need a minimum of 4,500 s.f. of root and canopy space. (Medium trees - 10,500 s.f., Large trees - 15,000 s.f.) That is not anywhere near what is commonly available or provided since buildings almost always maximize the site. With this example, the proposed modification to increase the quantity of trees is absurd. Even the existing specific plan ordinance requires potentially too many trees. The existing ordinance in requiring as many trees as it does, also is restricting the selection by allowing spaces in which to plant that can only handle small trees or palms. Large and medium trees would not be appropriate or acceptable since some day in the future they would be mutilated or removed prior to maturing. Example No. 2. Residential District No. 2. This typical site has a 25' x 100' lot with 2,500 s.f. The minimum front setback on side streets is 15' which leaves 375 s.f. of front yard to be divided up with planting area, entry walk and/or courtyard. The single lot tree requirements are: One (1) - street tree and one (1) on-site tree for a total of two (2) trees in the front yard area. If there is a landscaped parkway between the curb and sidewalk the street tree will be in the public right-of-way. If there is no parkway the street tree is then moved on-site creating two (2) on-site trees. In increasing numbers of instances the parkway is being shifted from between the curb and sidewalk to the back side of the sidewalk where it can be added to the on-site planting area. The original location of the sidewalk dividing the landscaped area is contributing to the problems of tree growth due to limited planting areas. To allow for a better landscaped planting area and proper tree growth of roots and canopy the walkway is placed at the back of curb and the parkway incorporated into the on-site landscaped area for more plantable area (see example). This also allows for less liability and property damage for street sweeping, delivery trucks, less disruption of curb and sidewalks and drainage problems, and allows a continuous design and maintenance area that is easier to maintain and thus providing a cleaner street scene. 3 1/ , :>,-,+xlr!'!A►:tw'r�97�1..sM�ypQM. 1� .• t.'';.a. __ _ _ ( � �0� •I Cr ���} � 'Y� `\; fit.' �'�V - •� ram: �(',T11 •�i s.M.��.: r rt �..i�L'17�'V yr� N�J;��J��� Y�5►D�St���] -•J�, ,:M't`R Y�2.tidl�•4<' �i' .•I f �� t� {�i'1�1 Example No. 3 Districts No. 3 and 4 have the same plantable space as District No. 2 but both require three (3) trees under current design guidelines. Example No. 4 District No. 5 requires three (3) trees for each 25 I.f. of frontage but only provides 75 s.f. of plantable area in that frontage by requiring that 10% of a plaza be landscaped on full block developments, otherwise no landscapeable areas need to be provided. Some streets are exempt from landscape requirements but the tree requirement is still in effect. Example No. 5 District No. 6 is similar to District No. 5 with tree requirements and planting area available. NOTE: A full breakdown of the typical districts follows on Pages 6 thru 13. Summary: All Districts have enough site restrictions to encourage maximizing the site with buildings and, therefore, minimizing plantable root and canopy space. At the same time tree requirements for on site trees in the Downtown Specific Plan mandate a quantity that cannot fit the provided areas unless palms are substituted. On P.C.H, palms are usually the only material that can survive the weather impacts. In addition, the Division No. 9 code requires street trees that, without a parkway between curb and sidewalk, now further impact the on site tree requirements. It is our recommendation that the current specific plan tree calculation formula be modified to be 1 - 36" box tree per 2,500 s.f. of gross site. If there is a parkway between the curb and sidewalk then a street tree shall be provided at 1 -24" box (36" box on P.C.H.) per 25' of site frontage. If no parkway is required the street tree requirement may be waived where appropriate and necessary, by the Superintendent of Park, Tree & Landscape at Plan Check. Provisions should be stated that allow a development to have large (or medium) size trees only if appropriate plantable root space and canopy space is provided. I.E. medium trees 700 s.f. + min. planting area and large trees 1,000 s.f. + planting areas per tree. 4 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TREE ANALYSIS (EXISTING ADOPTED CODE) Analysis For purposes of this study the following items have been summarized. 1. On site trees are quantified by using the existing requirement of: 1 - 36" box tree per 1500 s.f. of building floor area for commercial & office and/or 1 - 36" box tree for each residential unit. 2. Street trees are quantified by using the existing requirement of 1 - 24" box tree per 25' lot. For larger lots (100' and wider) 1 - 24" box tree per 45 U. or fraction of frontage would be utilized. (1 - 36" box per 45 I.f. or fraction on P.C.H.). 3. Trees (not including palms) require a minimum root and canopy space for growth in order to become mature. It is generally considered that the following are the approximate requirements for each tree size category. A. Small trees require 300 s.f.+ of plantable root space and canopy B. Medium of 700 s.f.+ " C. Large of 1,000 s.f.+ " 4. Palms are considered to be substitutes for trees with certain container size or brown trunk height minimums. However palms are not trees and do not have the same root and canopy space requirements. Palms do not generally invade sewer or water lines or heave concrete curbs, sidewalks, patios or streets. Palms have large but grasslike roots and are therefore able to be placed/planted in much smaller areas and closer to buildings or closer together than trees. Palms, in most instances, do not create a blockage of the view of business signage as do trees. A list of trees that fit into each general category follows on Pages 15, 16 and 17. 5 DISTRICT NO. 1 COMMERCIAL Minimum Lot Size: 10,000 s.f. w/100' frontage Minimum Setback- Front: P.C.H. 25'Average w/20' min. Side Street 20'Average w/15' min. Calculations: Tree Requirements St. Tree 1 per 451.f. = 3- 36" box- P.C.H. 3- 24" box Side St. On Site Trees 1 per 1,500 s.f. Floor Area = 4 36" box minimum Total: = 7 Trees minimum Anticipation of 4 lots @25'wide x 100'deep Equals 100' Frontage =10,000 s.f. site Maximum Building Coverage 50% of Site =5,000 s.f. floor area (based on first floor area only, more with multi-story buildings.) Minimum root Space Required for 7 Trees: Small trees 2,100 s.f. Medium 4,900 s.f. Large 7,000 s.f. Maximum Root and Canopy Space Available for 7 Trees: On P.C.H. 2,500 s.f. Less Hardscape Area =? On Side Street 2,000 s.f. _? Summary: Insufficient plantable space 6 Is DISTRICT NO. 2 RESIDENTIAL Minimum Lot Size: 2,500 s.f. w/25'frontage Minimum Setback- Front: P.C.H. 25'Average Setback. Side Streets 15'Average ". Minimum Combined Hardscape/Landscape Area P.C.H. 625 s.f. Side Street 375 s.f. Calculations: Tree Requirements St. Tree 1 per lot = 1 - 36" box- P.C.H. 1 - 24" box Side St. On Site Trees 1 per Unit_ = 1 36" box Total: = 2 Trees Minimum root Space Required for 2 Trees: Small trees 600 s.f. Medium 1,400 s.f. Large 2,000 s.f. Maximum Root and Canopy Space Available for 2 Trees: On P.C.H. 625 s.f. Less Hardscape Area =? On Side Street 375 s.f. _? Summary: Very insufficient plantable space 7 DISTRICT NO. 3 COMN ERCIAL Minimum Lot Size: 2,500 s.f.w/25' min.width Minimum Setback- Front: 15'Average Setback Minimum Combined Hardscape/Landscape Area 375 s.f. Calculations: Tree Requirements St. Tree 1 - 36" box- on P.C.H. 1 - 24" box on Side Sts. On Site Trees 2 - 36" box Total: = 3 Trees F.A.R. 2.0 x 2,500 s.f. lot = 5,000 s.f. Bldg. First Floor s.f. Max. = 1,780 s.f. 1 Tree per 1,500 s.f. or fraction of = 2 Trees (Based on first floor area only) Minimum Root Space Required for 3 Trees: Small trees 900 s.f. Medium 2,100 s.f. Large 3,000 s.f. Minimum Root Space Available for 3 Trees 375 s.f. Less Hardscape Area =? Summary: Grossly insufficient plantable space 8 DISTRICT NO. 4 MIXED USE OFFICE/RESIDENCE Minimum Lot Size: 2,500 S.F. Maximum by Coverage 50% Minimum Setback- Front: 15" Minimum Combined Hardscape/Landscape Area 375 s.f. Calculations: Tree Requirements St. Tree. 1- 24" box On Site Trees 1- 36" box Res. 2- 36"box Office Total: = 2 or 3 Trees Office Space 1780 s.f. =2 Trees 1 per 1,500 s.f. or fraction thereof. (Based upon first floor s.f. only- more if a multi-story building is proposed.) Minimum Root Space Required for 2 or 3 Trees: Small trees 600 s.f. or 900 s.f. Medium 1,400 s.f.or 2,100 s.f. Large 2,000 s.f.or 3,000 s.f. Minimum Root Space Available for 2 Trees 375 s.f. Less Hardscape Area:=? Summary: Very insufficient plantable space 9 DISTRICT NO. 5 MIXED COMMERCIAL./RESIDENTIAL Minimum Lot Size: 2,500 s.f. No Maximum Site Coverage Minimum Setback 15' Exception - To 5' on Some Streets 25' Lots Full Block Developments Require 10% of Net Site In Plaza Area w/30% of Plaza in Landscape. Calculations: Minimum Landscape Area 0 s.f. Plantable Area of Required Plaza Area =75 s.f. (per 25'of site frontage)- Main, 5th. and 3rd. Exempt. Tree Requirements St. Tree 1- 24" box(per 25' Frontage) On Site Trees 2- 36" box(per 25' Frontage) (1 per 1,500 s.f. or fraction) (Utilizing first floor space only) Total: = 3 Trees (per 25' Frontage) Minimum Root and Canopy Space Required for 3 Trees(per 25' Frontage) Small trees 900 s.f. Medium " 2,100 s.f. Large so3,000 s.f. Minimum Root Space Available for 3 Trees: For Single Lot Development- 0 s.f. For Multiple 75 s.f. of Landscape (per 25' Frontage) Summary: Unbelievably insufficient plantable space 10 DISTRICT NO. 6 MIXED COMMERCIAURESIDENTIAUOFFICE Minimum Parcel Size: 2,500s.f. Minimum Site Coverage - None Minimum Setback 15'w/5' Exception on Some Streets Calculations: Tree Requirements St. Tree 1 - 24" box per 25' Frontage. On Site Trees 2 36" box " Parcels w/100' or more of St. Frontage Require 10% of site as open space w/30% of this O.S. as planting or 300 s.f. of plantable area per 100 I.f. of frontage. Required Trees in 100' Frontage 4- 24" box St. Trees 8- 36" box on Site Trees Minimum Root and Canopy Space Required for 3 (1 Lot) or 12 (4 Lots)Trees Single Lot Four Lots Small trees 2,100 s.f. 3,600 s.f. Medium " 4,900 s.f. 8,400 s.f. Large N7,000 s.f. 12,000 s.f. Minimum Root and Canopy Space Available for 3 or 12 Trees: 0 s.f. for 3 Trees, possible 75 s.f. max 300 s.f. for 12 Trees Summary: Unbelievably insufficient plantable space 11 DISTRICT NO. 7 COMMERCIAL Minimum Lot Size: None Maximum Site Coverage - 50% Minimum Setback- Front: P.C.H. 50' . Side Street 20' . NOTE: Anticipated a 25' min. lot with x 100' Length= 2,500 s.f. lot min. Calculations: Anticipate a 30'x 25' max. buildable area equating to 750 s.f. of bldg. floor area on P.C.H. 1,250 s.f. Side Street Tree Requirements St. Tree 1 - 24" box On Site Tree 1 - 36" box=Min. 2 trees total Minimum Root and Canopy Space Required for 2 Trees: Small trees 600 s.f. Medium 1,400 s.f. Large 2,000 s.f. Maximum Root and Canopy Space Available for 2 Trees: On P.C.H. 1,250 s.f. Less Hardscape Area =? On Side Street 500 s.f. W =? Summary: On P.C.H. only small trees/palms can fit plantable area on side streets= insufficient plantable space. 12 DISTRICT NO. 8 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Minimum Lot Size: None Minimum Setback- Front: 20' 25' Beach Blvd. Minimum Setback- Sideyard 20' Note: Anticipate min. 25'wide x 100' lots min. front yard plantable area equals 500 s.f., 625 s.f. on Beach Blvd. Calculations: Density of 35 d.u./ac=0.0008034 units/s.f. or 2 units per 2,500 s.f. lot. Tree Requirements St. Tree 1- 24" box per 25'wide lot. On Site Tree 2- 36" box " Total: = 3 Trees Minimum Root and Canopy Space Required for 3 Trees: Small trees 900 s.f. Medium 2,100 s.f. Large 3,000 s.f. Minimum Root and Canopy Space Available for 3 Trees: 500 s.f. Less Hardscape Area =? 625 s.f. on Beach Blvd. Less Hardscape Area =? Summary: Very insufficient plantable space 13 SUMMARY: With the existing tree requirements and standards only small trees would be able to grow to their full potential without lifting and tearing up concrete hardscape and planters or growing into each other or buildings and requiring drastic pruning to keep each tree's individuality and character. In some districts there is not enough plantable area for even small trees to grow to maturity in the required quantities. Any proposed modification to the existing tree requirements to increase the amount of trees only multiplies the problem. This would then require at some future date the owner or the City or both to remove or deform the trees in order to keep the trees from overgrowing the planted space or damaging hardscape. This would not allow the trees to meet the expectations of the community for beautiful trees. It should be noted that substituting palms for trees allows more flexibility in the design location and the quantity of palms per plantable area. Palms require less root growing area (plantable area) than trees and they require less growing area for their head size than trees. Palms can be placed in smaller areas, closer together and closer to buildings, concrete walks and walls than trees due to their root growing habits. On P.C.H. some palms survive better in harsh climatic conditions of wind, atmospheric salts, sand and road scum than most all trees. Palms, therefore, have been required along this frontage and where side streets are heavily influenced by the same conditions. In prior years a Citizens Steering Committee from the Urban Land Institute Study Group recommended palm planting on many streets and highways and in the Downtown Area due to the expectations of residents and visitors to see a semi- tropical/Mediterranean landscape in and along the Pacific Ocean as is the setting in the City of Huntington Beach. 14 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TREE PLANTING DESIGN CRITERIA SMALL TREES, LARGE SHRUBS TRAINED INTO TREE FORMS: • Require 300 s.f. + of root growing area to grow to maturity. Types: NERIUM OLEANDER - STANDARD. RAPHIOLEPIS "MAJESTIC BEAUTY"STANDARD XYLOSMA CONGESTUM - STANDARD PITTOSPORUM CRASSIFOLIUM - STANDARD MELALEUCA NESOPHILIA - STANDARD NOTE: Roots generally not invasive or so robust as to lift concrete or asphalt. Can generally be grown in small places. 'NOTE:Studies have determined that tree roots generally extend further than previously known. It is usually found (depending on the tree type or variety, soil type, growing conditions and watering practices)that tree roots spread five to six times the canopy (dripline) diameter. This is not what was previously understood in the industry. Also, tree roots are generally found in the top two to three, sometimes four, feet of soil where air, nutrients,water and warmth are found. 15 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TREE PLANTING DESIGN CRITERIA MEDIUM SIZED TREES Require 700 s.f. + of root growing area to grow to maturity. Types: LEPTOSPERMUNI LAEVIGATUM MYOPORUM CARSONII (WITH SUPPORT)- STANDARD METROSIDEROS TOMENTOSUS LAGERSTROEMIA FAURIEI X"MUSKOGEE" LAGUNARIA PATTERSONII GEIJERA PARVIFOLIA NOTE: Roots more aggressive for some and can lift concrete sidewalks. 'NOTE:Studies have determined that tree roots generally extend further than previously known. It is usually found (depending on the tree type or variety, soil type, growing conditions and watering practices)that tree roots spread five to six times the canopy (dripline)diameter. This is not what was previously understood in the industry. Also, tree roots are generally found in the top two to three, sometimes four, feet of soil where air, nutrients, water and warmth are found. 16 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TREE PLANTING DESIGN CRITERIA • LARGE SIZED TREES ' Require 1,000 s.f.+ of root and canopy growing area to grow to maturity. Types: ARAUCARIA HETEROPHYLLA CATALPA BIGNONIOIDES TIPUANA TIPU CHORISIA SPECIOSA CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA CUPRESSUS MACROCARPA EUCALYPTUS SPECIES FICUS SPECIES MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA PINUS TORREYANA AGONIS FLEXUOSA NOTE: Large invasive root systems that easily lift concrete walks, curbs&gutters and streets, sometimes even buildings. •NOTE:Studies have determined that tree roots generally extend further than previously known. It is usually found (depending on the tree type or variety, soil type, growing conditions and watering practices)that tree roots spread five to six times the canopy (dripline) diameter. This is not what was previously understood in the industry. Also, tree roots are generally found in the top two to three, sometimes four, feet of soil where air, nutrients, water and warmth are found. 17 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN - ANNOTATED REVISIONS Development Standards 5.4 . 0 . 04 Add Definition "Development" "Demolition" General Provisions S.4 .2 . 04 Height (new definition) S.4 .2 . 06 Setback clarification 5.4 .2 . 13 (New) Parking - Exception for affordable housing S.4 .2 . 13 (b) See Parking Master Plan Exception added on affordable housing 5.4 .2 . 14 (c) (e) (New) Landscaping Requirements S.4 .2 . 15(f) Structures in view corridor maximum 36 inches S.4 .2 . 16(a) Reduced alley width to 24 feet S.4 .2 .29 (New) Affordable Housing Provisions S.4 .2.30 Add School Facilities Language (New) 5.4 .2 .31 Add Historic Properties Language (New) District No. 1 5.4 .3 Boundaries (amended) to include 6th - 9th Streets Coastal Element Amendment 5.4 .3 . 01 Strike List, conditional use permit for new construction only and certain change of uses 5.4 .3 . 01b Add Service Station Strike Reducing Salon, Retail Outdoor S.4 .3 . 03 Maximum Density/Intensity Based on Net Acre 5.4 .3 . 04 Delete Height Exception 5.4 .3 . 08 Alley Dedication may be reduced 24 feet/Residential Projects 5.4 . 3 . 09 Upper Story Setback - Remove reference to buildings over 45 feet, delete exception -1- District No. 2 S.4 .4 Purpose - Delete reference to incentives for consolidation S.4 .4 . 02 Minimum Parcel Size - Reduced to 2, 500 square feet S.4 .4 . 03 Maximum Density/Intensity amend to allow Less than 50 feet - 1 DU, 50 ft. - 4 DU 51 - 100 feet, 30 DU/net acre, 101 feet - full block, 35 DU/net acre S.4 .4 . 04 Delete Exception, maximum height 3 stories S.4 .4 . 09 Strike reference to buildings exceeding 45 feet, delete exception District No . 3 *S.4 . 5 . 01 Permitted Use Explain visitor serving more precisely, delete requirement for conditional use permit for change of use S.4 . 5 . 01 See District 1 changes S.4 . 5 . 01(d) Delete auditorium, convention facilities S.4 . 5 . 01(e) Amend to allow up to 50% residential Allow for 100% commercial S.4 . 5 . 02 Minimum Parcel Reduced to 2, 500 square feet S.4 . 5 . 03 Maximum Density/Intensity F.A.R. , reduce incentive Density 35 DU/net acre S. 5 .4 . 5 .04 H i h Less than 1/2 block - 3 stories Greater than 1/2/ block - 4 stories Delete reference to "feet" S.4 . 5 . 05 Delete site coverage and exception S.4 . 5 . 06 Setback (Front Yard) - Maximum building setback Main Street, 5 feet, Clarify "build to" requirement -2- *S.4 .5 . 09(b) Setback (Upper Story) - above the second story (c) Reduce upper story setback to 10 feet (e) Delete s .4 . 5 . 11 Pedestrian Overpass - Delete District No . 4 (Mixed Use; Office Residential) *S.4 . 6 Boundaries Amended - by eliminating and area and incorporating it into District No. 5 S.4 . 6 . 01(a Delete CUP Requirement for Single Family Homes *S.4 . 6 . 01(d) Delete list of uses S.4 . 6 . 01 Delete "note" 5.4 . 6 . 01(e) New provision allows residential 5.4 . 6 . 02 Minimum parcel size reduced to 1, 500 square feet 5.4 . 6 . 03 Maximum Density/Intensity Based on Net Acre 5.4 . 6 . 04 Height - Delete exception, minimum 3 story 5.4 . 6 . 06 Right-of-way dedication reduced to 2-1/2 feet 5.4 . 6 . 08 Alley 24 foot right-of-way District No. 5 5.4 .4 . 7 Boundaries - Amend boundary by incorporating certain blocks from District No. 4 5.4 . 7. 01 Permitted Uses - Conditional use permit required for new construction, and certain change of use 5.4 . 7. 01(b) Delete F, H, P and T shops, plazas, public open space, public buildings, reducing salon, retail sales, outdoor S.4 . 7. 01(c) (New) Commercial at ground level 5.4 . 7 . 02 Minimum parcel size 2, 500 square feet is -3- S.4 . 7. 03(a) Maximum Density/Intensity 25 DU/net acre S.4 . 7. 04 Height - 3 stories max./Less than full block 4 stories max./Full block or greater S.4 . 7. 04 Delete reference to parcels fronting on Main Street S.4 . 7. 06 "Build to Requirement" - see District 3 S.4 . 7. 10(a) Clarifies use of public plazas District No . 6 S.4 . 8 . 01 Permitted Uses - amend to require conditional use permit for new construction only, strike list of uses S.4 . 8 . 01(b) Amend list of uses requiring conditional use permit S.4 . 8 . 01(d) New provision - Residential permitted on 3rd and Lake Streets S.4 . 8 . 02 Minimum Parcel Size - Reduced to 2, 500 square feet New language about subdividing 50 foot parcels Reduce height S.4 . 8 . 03(a) Maximum Density/Intensity F.A.R. 2. 0 less than half-block 2.5 half-block to full block 3 . 0 full block or greater S.4 . 8 . 08 Alley width 24 feet District No. 10 S.4 . 12 Boundary amended to coincide with General Plan -4- DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN 4.0.01 Intent and Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide for orderly development and improvement within the Downtown Specific Plan. The plan is established to guide the development of the area which is characterized by its unique location, geographic features, land uses and ownership patterns, and should not be regulated by zoning district standards applicable throughout the city. This specific plan will replace the existing zoning with policies, development standards and descriptive maps specifically designed for the downtown area. The specific plan provides for creativity at the individual project level, and at the same time ensures that developments will ultimately combine to create a cohesive community. Only paragraph 4.0 et seq., "Development Standards", shall be certified as part of the Local Coastal Program. 4.0.02 Downtown Specific Plan Boundary The property described herein is included in the Downtown Specific Plan and shall be subject to policies and development standards set forth in this article.- Precisely, the Downtown Specific Plan includes the real property described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of Lot 22, Block 122 of the Huntington Beach Seventeenth Street Section Tract, as recorded in Book 4, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, State of California; thence northerly 50 feet approximately to a point, said point Downtown Specific Plan -3- (1913D) being the intersection of the centerlines of Goldenwest Street and Walnut Avenue; said point also being the true point of beginning; thence southwesterly along the centerline of Goldenwest Street and its prolongation to a-point on the high tide line of the Pacific Ocean; thence southeasterly along said high tide line to a line parallel with and 72.50 feet northwesterly, measured at right angles, from the southwesterly along said high tide line to a line parallel with and 72.50 feet northwesterly, measured at right angles, from the southwesterly prolongation of the centerline of Main Street; thence southwesterly along said line 1,470 feet approximately to a line parallel with heretofore said high tide line; thence southeasterly along said line 145 feet approximately to a line parallel with and 72.50 feet southeasterly, measured at right angles, from said southwesterly prolongation of the centerline of Main Street; thence northeasterly along said line to the heretofore said high tide line to the prolongated survey centerline of Beach Boulevard; thence northerly along said survey centerline of Beach Boulevard 2800 feet approximately to the south line of Tract 9580, as shown on a map recorded in Book 444, page 31, records of Orange County, State of California; thence westerly along said line 1995 feet approximately to the centerline of Huntington Street; thence northerly along said centerline 1320 feet approximately to the centerline of Atlanta Avenue; thence westerly along said centerline 857 feet approximately to the centerline of Lake Street; thence northerly along said centerline 2352 feet approximately to the centerline of Palm Avenue; thence westerly along said centerline 332 feet approximately to the centerline of Sixth Street; thence southwesterly to the centerline of Walnut Avenue; thence northwesterly along said centerline 5547 feet approximately to the true point of beginning. 4.0.03 Organization This section details the development standards for projects in the Specific Plan area. The section includes 1) regulations affecting administration and permitting, 2) general requirements for all projects of a certain size or type, 3) particular requirements for projects within the different Districts and 4) overlays which permit special uses in select areas. 4.0.04 Definitions The following definitions shall apply to the Downtown Specific Plan. Terms not described under this section shall be subject to the definitions contained in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Bolsa Chica State Beach: The area seaward of Pacific Coast Highway extending from the Huntington Beach City Pier northwest to Warner Avenue. The portion of this beach from the pier to Goldenwest Street is within the boundary of the Downtown Specific Plan. Build-to-line: A dimension which specifies where the structure must begin. For example, "build-to-5"', where the structure must extend to five feet of the lot line. Common open space: Any part of a lot or parcel unobstructed from the ground upward, excepting architectural features extending no more than thirty (30) inches from the structure and excluding any area of the site devoted to driveways and other parking areas. Downtown Specific Plan -4- (1913D) Director: The Director of the Department of Community Development. Development: The division of land, the construction, reconstruction, conversion, stucture alteration, relocation or enlargement of any structure. Demolition: The deliberate removal or destruction of the frame or foundation of any portion of a building or structure for the purpose of preparing the site for new construction or other use. Facade: The main face of front of a building. Feasible: Capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social and technological factors. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): A number which indicates how many square feet of structure can be built on a site, expressed as a multiple of the gross building site area. For example, if a site is 5,000 square feet in area and the FAR is 2.0, the square footage of a building cannot exceed 10,000 gross square feet (2 X 5,000). Fronting: Any lot or portion of a lot which abuts an arterial shall be considered to front on that arterial and shall comply with the required front yard setbacks, whether or not the development on that lot actually takes access from the arterial. Full block: A parcel of property bounded on all sides by public streets. Gross site area: The area within the lot lines of a parcel of land before public streets, allwys, easements or other areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use have been deducted. Half block: A parcel of property bounded on all sides by public streets and/or alleys containing at least one-half (1/2) the net area of the full block. FYCfYgYA: �iK�h/,cif,IG�I/di�i�f/d�/�K6V�/t�bl,/1'� slt�fal�l�alE.�Nt/�t/f �i/l ifs hf�(f��d/f dtY�IYS,�K�gt/�L�f�/Lr(YiY�,66f�ivl�/l�fY�/fY�i/i�d(�'/l�/ib�iY�,6(a��lf ryxd/df12(1AY2(M&WkUdf /t+M&YJgWs(Y1'2()u&6U;6 Height: See Section 4.2.04. Hotel: A building designed for or occupied as a temporary abiding place which contain guest room units. Net site area: The total horizontal area within the property lines of a parcel of land exclusive of all rights-of-way or easements which physically prohibit the surface use of that portion of the property for other than vehicular ingress and egress. Downtown Specific Plan -5- (1913D) Private open space: The area adjacent to a dwelling unit which has direct ` access in the form of a patio or balcony. Public open space: Public open space may include one of the following: open air commercial (open to the street on the first floor, or on at least one side, above the first floor, or open to the sky), patios, plazas, balconies, gardens or view areas accessible to the public. The open space requirement can be met anywhere in the development; however, open space provided above the second floor will receive only fifty (50) percent credit toward this requirement. This requirement cannot be met by open areas which are O/M01Y inaccessible to the public. Recreational Vehicle: A travel trailer, pick-up camper or motorized home with or without a mode of power and designed for temporary human habitation for travel or recreational purposes. Residual parcel: A legal lot which does not meet the requirements for a building site within the District in which it is located, and where the abutting sites are already developed. Right-of-way (ROW): That portion of property which is dedicated or over which an easement is granted for public streets or alleys. Semi-subterranean parking: Parking structure which is partially recessed into the development site, and which may or may not support additional structures above (e.g. dwelling units, tennis courts, or parking structures). Setback: A stipulated area adjacent to the lot lines which must be kept free of structures over forty-two (42) inches high. Street level: The elevation measured at the centerline of the public street adjacent to the front setback at a point midway between the two side property lines. Suite Hotel: A building designed for or occupied as a temporary abiding place which contain guest rooms and may contain kitchenettes and a separate living room for each unit. Townlot: The area and parcels bounded by Pacific Coast Highway on the southwest, Goldenwest Street on the northwest, Palm Avenue on the north and northeast, and Sixth Street on the east and southeast. Wetland: means lands within the coastal zone which may be covered periodically or permanently with shallow water and include saltwater marshes, freewater marshes, open or closed brackish water marshes, swamps, mudflats and fens. Ultimate right-of-way: The most lateral edge of the area dedicated for street or alley purposes. Downtown Specific Plan -6- (1913D) 4.1 ADMINISTRATION 4.1.01 Approvals Required All development within the Downtown Specific Plan shall be subject to one or more of the following, as identified in each district: a Conditional Use Permit , and/or the Design Review Board provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. All physical development shall be required to be reviewed by the Design Review Board prior to processing additional entitlements if required. The Historical Resources Board shall provide recommendations for structures considered to be historically significant. In addition, a Conditional Use Permit shall be required for any residential cooperative subdivision, mixed-use development, or any project which requires a special permit • (Section 4.1.02). The Design Review Board, Planning Commission or the City Council shall also consider the following before approving a project: (a) Projects shall be in conformance with the adopted Design Guidelines for the area. (b) Architectural features and general appearance of the proposed development shall enhance the orderly and harmonious development of the area or the community as a whole. (c) Architectural features and complimentary colors shall be incorporated into the design of all exterior surfaces of the buildings in order to create an aesthetically pleasing project. (d) Particular attention shall be given to incorporating signs, including their colors, into the overall design of the entire development in order to achieve uniformity. (e) Vehicular accessways shall be designed with landscaping and building variation to eliminate an alley-like appearance. 4.1.02 Special Permit The Downtown Specific Plan development standards are designed to encourage developments creating an aesthetically pleasing appearance, enhancing the living environment, and facilitating innovative architectural design and adaptation of the development to the unique surrounding environment. Downtown Specific Plan -7- (1913D) Deviations from the development regulations of this Specific Plan, may be granted at the time of project approval for unique architectural siting or features, including but not limited to parcel size, building height, site coverage, setbacks, open space and landscaping. A special permit may not be granted for deviations from maximum density or parking requirements or deviation for building heights in Districts 1, 2, 4, 10 and 11 or from requirements of the Conservation Overlay. Such deviations shall only be allowed when, in the opinion of the Planning Commission, significantly greater benefits from the project can be provided than would occur if all the minimum requirements were met. Some additional benefits which may make a project eligible for exemptions include: greater open space, greater setbacks, unique or innovative designs, public parking, public open space, and the use of energy conservation or solar technology. The developer may request a Special Permit at the same time as the filing of an application for a Conditional Use Permit and shall be heard concurrently. The Planning Commission may approve the Special Permit in whole or in part upon a finding that the proposed development, in addition to providing greater benefits as required above, will also: (a) Promote better living environments; (b) Provide better land planning techniques with maximum use of aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, landscaping, site layout and design; (c) Not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of the neighborhood or City in general, nor detrimental or injurious to the value of property or improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general; and (d) Be consistent with objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan in achieving a development adapted to the terrain and compatible with the surrounding environment. (e) Be consistent with the policies of the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan and the California Coastal Act. (f) Comply with State and Federal law. 4.1.03 Coastal Permit Developments within the Downtown Specific Plan area will be subject to the requirements.pertaining to Coastal Development Permits (CDP), in addition to the other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4.1.04 Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this title, or any future amendments or additions hereto, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this title, or any future amendments or additions hereto. The Council hereby declares that it would have adopted these titles and each Downtown Specific Plan -8- (1913D) i sentence, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion or any future amendments or additions thereto, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, portions or any future amendments or additions thereto may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 4.1.05 Appeals Decisions by the Director on non-zoning matters may be appealed to the City Administrator; decisions on zoning matters may be appealed to the Planning Commission and City Council. Downtown Specific Plan -9- (1913D) 4.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS The general provisions of this article shall apply to all developments within the Downtown Specific Plan area wherever the size or type of development proposed would make such provisions applicable. All development shall comply with all existing standard plans and specifications and all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance and Municipal Codes. 4.2.01 Permitted Uses. Permitted uses shall be established in each District and shall be required to meet all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. In addition, the following shall apply: (a) All structures incidental and accessory to a permitted principal use or structure may be erected on any parcel containing a main building • provided that such structure(s) not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height nor to be closer than ten (10) feet to any other structure on the same parcel and shall conform with all setback requirements of the District. Exception: Parking structures are excluded from this provision. (b) Parcels which, prior to the effective date of this ordinance, had an oil suffix (0,01) and are identified in Figure 4.14, shall retain such suffix in combination with the new zoning designation "Downtown Specific Plan" (see Section 4.14). (c) Parcels which, prior to the effective date of this ordinance, had a Mobilehome District (MH), shall retain such designation in combination with the new zoning designations in the "Downtown Specific Plan" serving as an overlay, for the effected Districts (see Section 4.16). (d) All nonconforming uses or structures, or uses which have been abandoned for more than six (6) months shall be required to meet all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code in each of the following: • Any expansion of floor area greater than ten (10) percent; increase in height; or an increase in the permitted density shall require a conditional use permit and shall be required to comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Deviations to development standards (except parking and density) shall be subject to special permits. Downtown Specific Plan -10- (1913D) • Exception: Any building alteration, rehabilitation or facade improvement which does not exceed ten (10) percent expansion of the existing floor area; does not increase the height; or result in an increase in permitted density. The Design Review Board shall review and approve any proposed exterior modifications. • Any change of use, expansion of use, or change in occupant to a use which would require additional off street parking shall provide the required off street parking according to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4.2.02 Minimum Parcel Size. A minimum parcel size shall be established in each District. A waiver of this requirement may be granted by the Director for residual parcels. In addition, the following minimum floor areas shall apply to all residential dwelling units: Minimum Floor Unit Type Area (Sq. Ft.) Bachelor and single 450 One (1) bedroom 650 Two (2) bedrooms 900 Three (3) bedrooms 1100 Four (4) bedrooms 1300 4.2.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum allowable density and/or intensity (Floor Area Ratio) shall be established in each District. 4.2.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum allowable building height shall be established in each District. In addition, the following shall apply: (a) Commercial structures shall have a maximum of fifteen(15) feet for the and first story ten (10) feet for each additional story. Residential structures shall have a maximum of ten (10) feet for each story and subject to the following provisions. (2fy(b) An additional ten (10) feet in height will be allowed for roof line treatment, architectural features such as chimneys, solar energy equipment and mechanical devices. In no case may the air space granted for these purposes above the maximum height limit be used as a habitable room. &Y Lcc) An additional fourteen (14) feet in height may be allowed for elevator equipment. All mechanical devices, except for solar panels, shall be set back and screened so that they cannot be seen from public right-of-ways. 4.2.05 Ma imum Site Coverage. The maximum allowable site coverage shall be established in each District. Any part of the site covered by a roof, including covered walkways, patios and carports, shall be included in coverage. Exception: Subterranean or semi-subterranean parking less than forty-two (42) inches in height above the adjacent grade shall be subject to the provisions of Section 4.2.12(c). Downtown Specific Plan -11- (1913D) 4.2.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback shall be established in each District. In addition, the following shall apply: (a) No structure or portion of any structure shall project into or over the public ROW. (b) The minimum front yard setback for parking lots and all parking structures above grade shall be ten (10) feet. Structures below 42 inches in height are not subject to this provision. (c) The minimum front yard setback for subterranean and semisubterranean parking structures shall be subject to the approval of the Director and the Department of Public Works. The depth of the front yard setback shall be a minimum of five (5) feet. 4.2.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum side yard setback shall be established in each District. In addition, the following shall apply: The minimum exterior side yard setback for parking lots and above grade parking structures shall be ten (10) feet. 4.2.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be established in each District. 4.2.09 Setback (Upper Story). An upper story setback shall be established in each District. 4.2.10 Building Separation. No building shall be closer than ten (10) feet to any other detached building on the same site. 4.2.11 Open Space. A minimum public open space provision will be established in each District. In addition, the following open space requirements shall apply to all residential developments: (a) Common Open Space: All multi-family residential developments shall provide a minimum common open space equal to twenty-five (25) percent of the floor area of each unit with a minimum dimension of twenty (20) feet. Common open space shall be designed so that it enhances the appearance of the project to passers-by. In multiple unit subdivision developments, common areas shall be guaranteed by a restrictive covenant describing the common space and its maintenance and improvement, running with the land for the benefit of residents of the development. The developer shall file with the Department of Community Development for recordation with the final subdivision map, legal documents which will provide for restricting the use of common spaces for the designated purpose, as approved on the final development plan. All lands to be conveyed to the homeowner's association shall be subject to the right of the grantee or grantees to enforce maintenance and improvements of the common space. Downtown Specific Plan -12- (1913D) (b) Private Open Space: All multi-family residential developments shall provide the following all ground floor units shall be provided with a patio area as set forth below. Minimum Area Min. Dim. Unit Type (Sq. Ft. L1 Bachelor, single or one (1) bedroom 200 10 Two (2) bedrooms 250 10 Three (3) bedrooms 300 10 Four (4) bedrooms 400 10 Units constructed above ground level shall be provided with balconies or sun decks as follows: Minimum Area Min. Dim. Unit Type (Sg Ft.) Ft. Bachelor, single or one 60 6 (1) bedroom Two (2), three (3), or 120 6 four (4) bedrooms Note: Private open space shall be contiguous to the unit and for the exclusive use of the occupants. Private open space shall not be accessible to any dwelling unit except the unit it serves. Private open space shall be physically separated from common areas by a wall or hedge at least forty-two (42) inches in height. The private open space requirement may be satisfied in whole or in part by areas used for outdoor activities which need not be open to the sky but must be open on at least one (1) side. 4.2.12 Multi-block Consolidations. Where consolidations span two (2) or more Districts, the requirements of each District shall apply to that portion of the development. Divisions between Districts shall be the center line of the vacated street. In addition, the following shall apply: (a) Visitor-serving commercial uses must be provided within that portion of the development designated as a visitor-serving District. (b) Commercial uses must be provided on the ground floor along Main Street. 4.2.13 Parkine. All developments will be required to meet the minimum off-street parking standards of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code except as modified by the Downtown Parking Master Plan. 1YI/2fddW6tYAbdA1& i�ig/�f6 I6t�dfi/tY►�I�f> ht 7ddWih&1bU6NYjAg Rc'iYdth'F46U Y2(Y PkWYY1g1f6t/idiVfY4fLWY}ihd(Igid&YtWdbVdYdWWf!tl&2f Yb(d4fv'dGdW �/1Yi�t'b�16+Wi'�Ig/t�f,I6l ¢tbViH�d/�Otil�tM,bf�I�l�tiFi�Jd�J�1i�YF4A/l1//2ybY4iYYd/0AtkRf4 g�d�g/d�bf/�i/Yi�EN�h'dM/}5�,6ffif�,�Kialvid/tl�dlbfs'�d[ Downtown Specific Plan -13- (1913D) �Jbftd1S/�1'�Ll/f�b/EbVdt6�,�Kd/dfib�l bid! tif�i�d6fibflfalvfd/t�hldd�G,bb�d! ! AlN/t f(fvWdloAtkWlgUiYV b(d Abh;if L&ffbff4YY0(1*UhW h)W 6 htddfbS4t00'ytWYAYffiN4i/dAt,iYM ft AiviYYAAIYY,H'dgfgtWAU i&kldi/,a"/ vffg/dWrArdt/t6i/g YA(Y 4r4il2M f6bFd#WY5rIlvl/ ! S�t �',b�fvide/fifeffi/gY�U/�t6�G�ia'htr'��rS,t�bf/ll bl�fsldd/�f�3'/2'�(ivlbl�stdd/�¢b�d�/dt�/�it�d! Exception: Affordable housing projects may reduce the required on-site guest parking. ib/ /tzitvitvffCf/df/df� aldEJ ,(�r�r/�ld i)W&ciifloAt IYVA(!/Y/2/OAbW4Ydf/dtVi!/Ifi/MUA46iYIA The guest parking may be provided on-street or in a public parking facility within 350 feet of the affordable housing project, subject to a conditional use permit. Commercial: (UY(a) Parking for all commercial projects shall be consistent with the Downtown Parking Master Plan, Districts 1, 7, 9 shall provide one-hundred (100) percent of the required parking on-site. Districts 3, 4, 5, 6 and 10 shall be provided on site to the maximum extent feasible or as modified in the Parking Master Plan . The balance of any required parking shall be provided in facilities within walking distance, not to exceed 350 feet. These off-site parking spaces shall be in place prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the any development. jar(b) All off-street uncovered surface parking spaces shall be screened. Screening shall be at least five (5) feet high as measured from the adjacent parking surface. Screening shall consist of landscaping or landscaping combined with opaque materials, and must be approved by the Director. 4.2.14 Landscaping. In addition to City standard landscape plans and specifications, the following shall apply: (a) All setback areas fronting on or visible from an adjacent public street, and all recreation, leisure and open space areas shall be landscaped and permanently maintained in an attractive manner and shall be consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines. (b) Permanent automatic electric irrigation facilities shall be provided in all landscaped areas. Downtown Specific Plan -14- (1913D) (c) On-site trees shall be provided in all developments as follows: 6f �(I1/ytY�ftyi�,�i6d(3 /trb6hf/t��� three (3) fifteen (15) gallon trees for each residential unit or for each 1,500 square feet of net commercial or office space. AlYtWMVibW�,1Yh&,fb'U6VYYfg/ ftfA(2fYdA16f/tYVtty, Sad(a6�ytr bEr�f/t�1��/hf d r d�GdebK where feasible (except when palm trees are required): Seventy-five (75) percent of the total requirement shall be thirty-six (36) inch box trees and the remaining twenty-five (25) percent of such requirement may be provided at a ratio of one (1) inch for one (1) inch through the use of twenty-four (24) inch box trees. Additional trees and shrubs shall also be planted to provide a well-balanced landscape environment. Exception: Structures fronting on Main Street, Fifth Street and Third Street, with a required five (5) foot setback shall be exempt from this requirement. (d) A landscape and irrigation plan in conformance with the adopted Design Guidelines shall be subject to approval by the Director and the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of building permits. (e) All parking lots shall provide a decorative masonry wall or landscaped berm installed in the setback area, all landscaping shall be installed within the parking lot area, in accordance with the Huntngton Beach Ordinance Code. Parking structures must all screen street-level parking areas from the public ROW. Such screening must be approved by the Director. The setback area shall be landscaped in accordance with the following guidelines and a landscape plan shall be submitted to and aproved by the Director: • Planting material shall include at a minimum &NAM three (3) fifteen (15) gallon size tree and three (3) five (5) gallon size shrubs for each seventy-five (75) square feet of landscaped area &HldYAbfV!(Y,f OJ(YyhhfvbW4ii J(/3'g'hfYfdM6M YJ dbii2f¢bfikVdA where feasible (except when palm trees are required). • The setback area shall be planted with suitable groundcover. • The landscaped area shall be provided with an irrigation system which conforms to the standards specified for landscaped medians by the Department of Public Works. • All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and attractive manner. 4.2.15 Street Vacations. The following conditions will apply to City vacation of streets and alleys for consolidation of parcels greater than one block in size. Downtown Specific Plan -15- (1913D) (a) Streets shall be vacated only after the City has analyzed the impacts on circulation patterns and determined that the vacation will not be detrimental. (b) Where streets are to be vacated, the cost of relocating all utilities shall be borne by the developer; the City Council may waive this requirement. (c) Any public parking lost by street vacations must be replaced either on or off site or through in lieu fees. Such parking shall be in addition to required parking for the proposed use. (d) Consolidations that require vacation of a portion of Main Street north of Orange Avenue shall provide a public plaza space that will enhance the Main Street corridor to the pier. The type of facility and its design shall be approved by the City. (e) At the discretion of the iQAY Planning Commission, all or portions of Main Street may be used for a pedestrian mall. (f) Any development proposing the vacation of streets intersecting PCH in District 2 and District 3 shall provide a view corridor not less than the width of the former street between Walnut Avenue and PCH. No structures greater than fYV&(SY)Wc'f thirty-six (36) inches in height shall be allowed within such view corridor. A pedestrian easement ten (10) feet wide shall be provided through the development generally parallel to the vacated street. 4.2.16 Access Ways. The following standards shall apply to all vehicular access ways: (a) Developments abutting Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and Main Street shall dedicate sufficient additional land along the alleys parallel to these rights-of-way so that t:: -.,.leys have an ultimate width of BVff*/f01J twenty-four (24) feet :n the case of commercial or mixed use developments, or twenty (20) feet in the case of residential only developments. Access to development shall be permitted from these alleys. Access to development shall not be taken directly from PCH or Main Street; new automobile curb cuts on these rights-of-way are prohibited. (b) Private access ways shall have a minimum paved width of not less than twenty-eight (28) feet. An additional twelve (12) foot wide travel lane may be required in each direction of traffic flow into the development for a distance of one hundred (100) feet, where an access way intersects a local or arterial public street. (c) Private access ways exceeding one hundred fifty (150) feet in length but less than three hundred (300) feet in length, shall be provided with a turn-around having a minimum radius of thirty-one (31) feet. For those access ways exceeding three hundred (300) feet but less than six hundred (600) feet, there shall be provided a turn-around having a minimum radius of forty (40) feet or an intertying loop circulation system. For those access ways exceeding six hundred (600) feet, there shall be provided an intertying loop circulation system. Downtown Specific Plan -16- (1913D) 4.2.17 Lighting. For developments of more than two (2) units, the developer shall install an on-site lighting system on all vehicular access ways and along major walkways. Such lighting shall be directed onto driveways and walkways within the development and away from adjacent properties. Lighting shall also be installed within all covered and enclosed parking areas. A lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Director. 4.2.18 Outside Storage Space. Where a proposed residential development does not include a separate attached garage for each dwelling unit, a minimum of one hundred (100) cubic feet of outside storage space shall be provided for each such unit. 4.2.19 Sewer and Water Systems. Sewer and water systems shall be designed to City standards and shall be located underneath streets, alleys or drives. In no case shall individual sewer lines or sewer mains for a dwelling unit be permitted to extend underneath any other dwelling unit. 4.2.20 Sigma. All signs in the development shall conform to the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Commercial signs in mixed developments shall not be intrusive to residential development or other uses and shall be consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines. (a) The placement of address numbers shall be at a uniform location throughout the development and shall be approved by the Director. (b) When appropriate, the developer shall install on-site street name signs at the intersections of access ways, as approved by the City Engineer. Street name signs shall also be approved by the Director for design and type and shall be consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines. All signs required by this section shall be installed at the approved locations prior to the time the first dwelling unit is occupied. 4.2.21 Refuse Collection Areas. In residential development, refuse collection areas shall be provided within two hundred (200) feet of the units they are to serve. In all developments, trash areas shall be enclosed or screened with a masonry wall, and shall be situated in order to minimize noise and visual intrusion on adjacent property as well as to eliminate fire hazard to adjacent structures. Residents shall be provided with collection areas that are separate and distinct from the collection area of offices and other commercial activities. 4.2.22 Vehicular Storage. Storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles (as defined herein) and other similar vehicles shall be prohibited unless specifically designated areas for the storage of such vehicles are set aside on the final development plan and, in the case of condominium developments, provided for in the association's covenants, conditions, and restrictions. Where such areas are provided, they shall be enclosed and screened from view on a horizontal plane from adjacent areas by a combination of a six (6) foot high masonry wall and permanently maintained landscaping. 4.2.23 Antennas. All roof top antennas are prohibited. Downtown Specific Plan -17- (1913D) 4.2.24 Utility Lines. All utility lines shall be undergrounded where possible. 4.2.25 Bus Turnouts. In commericial developments of one half block or more, dedication shall be made for bus turnouts as recommended by O.C.T.D. Any bus turnout so recommended shall be incorporated as part of the development plan. 4.2.26 Orange County Transit District Center. A transit center shall be located within proximity of the downtown area which will provide pedestrians access to the beach and retail services. 4.2.27 Homeowners' or Community Association. All multiple unit subdivision developments shall be approved subject to submission of a legal instrument or instruments setting forth a plan or manner of permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, and communal facilities. No such instrument shall be acceptable until approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and effect, and by the Department of Community Development as to suitability for the proposed use of the open areas. If the common open spaces are to be conveyed to the homeowners' association, the developer shall file a declaratic:_. of covenants, to be submitted with the application for approval, that will govern the association. The provisions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (a) The homeowners' association shall be established prior to the initial sale of the last dwelling units. (b) Membership shall be mandatory for each buyer and any successive buyer. (c) The open space restrictions shall be permanent. 4.2.28 Compliance with certain requirements of the Coastal Zone (CZ) Suffix: Projects shall comply with the following sections of the Coastal Zone Suffix: "Community Facilities"; "Diking, Dredging and Filling"; "Hazards"; "Buffer Requirements"; "Energy"; and "Signs" as identified in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4.2.29 Affordable Housing Residential projects that offer 50% of the units to persons and households earning between 80-100% of the Orange County Median Income as defined by HUD for a period of 30 years may be eligible for a reduction in the following development standards. Guest Parking- If determined by the Planning Commission that adequate excess public psrking is available the Planning Commission may grant a maximum 100% waiver depending on size and location of project. Downtown Specific Plan -18- (1913D) Common Open Space - Maximum 70% reduction if replaced by private open space. (roof decks may be used to satisfy a portion of this requirement) Site Coverage - Maximum 75%. Height - Maximum four stories in any district. Density - The Floor Area Ratio formula may be substituted for units per acre in each district. A maximum 1.0 Floor Area Ratio will apply to affordable projects. Minimum Unit - Studio 300 square feet Size 1 bedroom 450 square feet 2 bedroom 800 square feet It is the intent of these provisions to provide maximum design flexibility while still maintaining high quality design standards in exchange for affordable housing. 4.2.30 School Facilities: A school facilities impact mitigation and reimbursement agreement shall be a condition of approval for any subdivision, tentative tract, or parcel map within the Specific Plan. The agreement shall provide for the adequate mitigation of impacts on the elementary and/or high school district providing adequate funding of school facilities necessary to serve the student population generated by the proposed development. This condition may be waived by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and will not apply to affordable housing projects as defined in the Specific Plan. 4.2.31 Historic Properties: The Historic Resources Board shall provide recommendations for structures considered to be historically significant as identified in the City's 1989 Historic Survey to the Design Review Board and Planning Commission. Downtown Specific Plan -19- (1913D) 4.3 DISTRICT #1: VISITOR-SERVING COMMERCIAL Purpose. This District is limited to three nodes fronting on Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) which are adjacent to medium and high density residential Districts. These nodes provide sites for commercial facilities to serve visitors to the City and State Beaches. The area between Goldenwest and 6th Streets will be primarily medium to high density residential. Residential uses will also be permitted in this District, as long as the necessary visitor-serving uses are included in the development. Boundaries. District #1 includes three nodes: The two blocks from Goldenwest to 21st Streets, between PCH and the midline of the alley; the two blocks from 18th to 16th Streets, between PCH and the midline of the alley; and the block from 9th to 6th between PCH and the midline of the alley. Downtown Specific Plan -20- (1913D) Hu Uu hL PALM � �� [lf1 1 IClLI� �OL�� C0 �� 0ACACIA PE AN � � - � .�0��7 �70J� �C10�7 �]�I1 �� �0 �7C1 ��J I�] � �CI�CC��I�C'�!��017���0�7u sou DE 00 Do 00 Do no ED Do no 00 ooPACIFIC COAST HWY. NEW VISITOR SERVING COMMERCIAL NODE _ �sm000 � oo � 000 � 7� PACIFIC OCEAN ��%E�iwxxu DISTRICT 1 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN 4.3.01 Permitted Uses. (a) New construction and establishment of new commercial and/or mixed-use projects which cater to year round residents in District #1 may be 66bK allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. For Example: • Banks • Bicycle sales, rental and repair • Bookstores • Clothing stores Delicatessens • Drug stores • Dry Cleaning • Florists • Groceries • Hardware stores Laundromats, laundries • Newstands • Offices • Office supplies • Public facilities • Restaurants • Service station minimum 14,000 square feet, no repair permitted, no service bays • Shoe repair • Sporting goods Other related uses (b) A change to the following uses in District #1 may be allowed subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: • Health and sports clubs • Liquor stores • Live entertainment • Permanent parking lots and parking structures • Residential uses • Restaurants • Service station (c) Visitor-serving commercial uses must be a part of all development proposed in this District, with the following minimum requirements; for projects with less than a half-block of frontage, the entire street level must be devoted to visitor-serving uses; for projects with a half-block or more of frontage, either the entire street level, or at least one-third (1/3) of the total floor area must be devoted to visitor-serving commercial uses. Downtown Specific Plan -21- (1913D) (d) Residential uses are allowed only in conjuction with visitor-serving commercial uses. The required visitor-serving commercial portion of any initial construction shall be provided prior to or at the same time as any residential portion. No residential unit shall be occupied until the required commercial portion is completed. Projects which are proposed to be phased must proportionately develop the commercial and residential concurrently. 4.3.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be 10,000 sq. ft. of net site area and one hundred (100) feet of frontage on PCH. 4.3.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall be 25 per net acre. Floor Area Ratio 1.0. 4.3.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be tYLittyf/fi�(oi��(89y�k�t'fal�d/no more than three (3) stories. 4.3.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. 4.3.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be twenty-five (25) feet from Pacific Coast Highway right-of-way. This setback may be reduced to twenty (20) feet on up to fifty (50) percent of the frontage, provided that the average setback for total site frontage is not less than twenty-five (25) feet. The setback area shall be limited to landscaping only and shall be designed to be compatible with the Bluff Top Landscaping area located across Pacific Coast Highway. 4.3.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum aggregate side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Interior side yard setback shall be twenty (20) percent of lot frontage total with not less than seven (7) feet on a side. (b) Exterior side yard setback shall be twenty (20) percent of lot frontage total with not less than fifteen (15) feet, from any public ROW. 4.3.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Structures may be cantilevered to the rear property line. Note: An additional right-of-way dedication will be required to widen the alley to fh1tf*1(3 1M9 A twenty-four (24) feet for mixed use and commercial projects. Downtown Specific Plan -22- (1913D) 4.3.09 Setback (Upper Story). The covered portion of all stories above the second shall be set back an average of an additional ten (10) feet from the second story facade. 4.3.10 Open Space. A public open space and pedestrian access amenity, subject to approval of the Director, may be required for development projects one full block or greater in size; in order to assure a predominantly visitor-serving orientation. Downtown Specific Plan -23- (1913D) 4.4 DISTRICT #2: RESIDENTIAL Purpose. This District allows residential development exclusively. While allowing higher densities, the District employs graduated height limits and proportional setback requirements to keep the scale of new developments compatible with the existing residential neighborhood. Boundaries. District #2 includes the first block along PCH to Walnut Avenue between Goldenwest Street and 6th Streets except for the area included in District #1. Downtown Specific Plan —24— (1913D) PALM uC0 -1 -[] OC []CIi�CI017L1C1 �1J �� CILI [I� D� Of] []flflCll;� �I� =HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA sp N am. Pq pq PACIFIC COAST_HWY PACIFIC OCEAN 411IN3 Dt%2ACD& 'o/ 1 �/ PLANNING DEPARTMENTDISTRICT DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN 4.4.01 Permitted Uses. The following residential uses iMU may be O&WAtt i allowed in District #2: multi-family housing, apartments, condominiums and stock-cooperatives subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Exception: Single Family Detached Dwellings which comply with the development standards of District 2 shall be subject to approval of the Design Review Board. Note: Reference Resolution No. 5760 4.4.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be twenty-five (25) feet of frontage and 2,500 square foot net size area. 4.4.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall increase as the parcel size increases according to the following: Lot Size (Frontage) Maximum Allowable Density less than 50' 1 du 50' 4 du 51' up to 100' 30 units per net acre (1/eW,,/1042 • 101' - full block 35 units net acre No Floor Area Ratio will apply to this District 4.4.04 Maximum Building Height: The maximum building height shall be IMft*/MWXAWLWt'fa A&no more than three (3) stories. 4.4.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. 4.4.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be as follows: (a) Parcels fronting on PCH, require a minimum setback of twenty-five (25) feet. This setback shall be limited to landscaping only and shall be designed to be compatible with the Bluff Top landscaping located across Pacific Coast Highway. Note: This setback may be reduced by five (5) feet on up to fifty(50) percent of the frontage, provided that the average setback for the total site frontage is not less than twenty-five (25) feet. (b) Parcels fronting all other streets except PCH, require fifteen (15) feet. This setback may be reduced to eight (8) feet on up to fifty (50) percent of the frontage provided that the average setback for the total site frontage is not less than fifteen (15) feet. Downtown Specific Plan -25- (1913D) 4.4.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum aggregate side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Parcels with one hundred (100) feet or less of frontage require twenty (20) percent of the lot frontage, with not less than three (3) feet on 2 side. Exterior yards require not less than five (5) feet from a public -:.OW. Exception: Garages located on a single twenty-five (25) foot wide lot*, will be allowed an exterior yard reduction to not less than three (3) feet from a public ROW. * Note: Twenty-five (25) foot wide lots may have a zero interior side yard setback on one side if: 1) adjacent property is under same ownership and developed at the same time; 2) at least five (5) feet is provided on the opposite side yard of both properties; 3) no portion of a building at a zero lot line is closer than six (6) feet to an adjacent building, if the buildings are not abutting. (b) Parcels with greater than one hundred (100) feet but less than a half block of frontage require twenty (20) pe-'..-ent of the frontage, with not less than seven (7) feet on any interior yard, and not less than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. (c) Parcels with greater than a half block of frontage require not less than seven (7) feet on any interior yard and not less than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. • 4.4.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be as follows: (a) Parcels fronting on PCH require not less than three (3) feet. Note: An additional right-of-way dedication will be required to widen the alley to twenty (20) feet. (b) Parcels fronting all other streets, except PCH, require not less than seven and one-half (7.5) feet. Structures may be cantilevered into this setback, however, not closer than two and one-half (2.5) feet from the rear property line. 4.4.09 Setback (Upper Story). The covered portion of all structures above the second story shall be set back an average of an additional ten (10) feet from the second story facade. Downtown Specific Plan -26- (1913D) 4.4.10 Open Space: (a) Projects which maintain the twenty-five (25) foot front setback along Pacific Coast Highway shall be allowed to use the front setback area towards common open space. Any encroachments into the twenty-five (25) foot front setback area shall require common open space to be located behind the front setback. (b) No public open space shall be required in this District. 4.4.11 Resource Production Overlay. A portion of District #2 is designated with an Oil Suffix (O, 01). Within this area, all the requirements of the resource production overlay shall apply (see Section 4.14). Downtown Specific Plan -27- (1913D) i 4.5 DISTRICT #3: VISITOR-SERVING COMMERCIAL Purpose. This District is limited to the five blocks fronting on Pacific Coast Highway across from the City pier. The visitor-serving category is broad enough to include many commercial activities which will also serve the needs of the surrounding community, providing an off-season clientele for the District. The plan also allows residential and office uses in this District so long as the required visitor-serving commercial is provided. Large amounts of ground level open space are encouraged in this District to further promote the feeling of openness and to provide additional view opportunities. Boundaries. District #3 includes the area between PCH and Walnut, from 6th to 7�"I- SUMY 1st Streets. Downtown Specific Plan -28- (1913D) PECAN ORANGE OLNE N 0 N in N N N H WALNUT v FIFx x x x z N < N o LLI z O y z W N z O cn LL W d' LL _ N _ 11. PACIFIC COAST HWY. PACIFIC OCEAN nun oma►ta DISTRICT 3 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION 4.5.01 Permitted Uses. (a) New construction and establishment of a commercial core which serves as the transition between visitor-serving and year round commercial uses in District #3 may be O&WA fW allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. FW S"doylet • Art gallery Bakeries • Beach, swimming and surfing equipment • Bicycle rental and repair Bookstores • Clothing stores • Ice cream parlors • Newstands • Photographic processing • Tourist related public and semi-public buildings, services and facilities • Other related uses (b)A change to the following uses in District #3 may be allowed subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: Arcades ! A(�ddidtdt� ! O'dli�(n�vlit WAbUfflW ' • Dancing and/or live entertainment as a primary or accessory use • Hotel and licensed bed and breakfast designed as a commercial Liquor stores • Permanent parking lots and parking structures Restaurants • Residential uses* • Retail sales, outdoor • Theaters *Note: This use is prohibited on the ground floor or street level fronting on Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway. (c) The ground floor or street level of all buildings in this District fronting Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway shall be devoted to visitor-serving commercial activities. (d) Visitor-serving commercial uses must be a part of all development proposed in this District with a minimum requirement that the entire street level, and at least one-third (1/3) of the total floor area be devoted to visitor-serving commercial uses. (e) Residential uses shall only be permitted if the development includes consolidation of a one block or greater area. Downtown Specific Plan -29- (1913D) Note: Residential uses are allowed only in conjunction with visitor-serving commercial uses. Up to one-half(1/2) of the floor area of projects may be devoted to residential uses. (f) The required visitor-serving commercial portion of any project shall be provided prior to or at the same time as any residential portion. No residential unit shall be occupied until the required commercial portion is complete. (g) In the event of a consolidation of a minimum one block area, non-priority (residential) uses may be located in separate structures or on separate portions of the parcel in the context of a planned development, provided no less than one-half of the total floor area permitted is devoted to visiter-serving uses, and provided that substantial public open space and pedestrian access amenities are provided to maintain a predominantly visitor-serving orientation. 4.5.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be ftif�/t14bUsl�rtd'(8�@00') two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of net site area and fifty/(WI twenty-five (25) feet of frontage. 4.5.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum intensity of development shall be calculated by floor area ratios (FAR) for this District. The floor area ratio shall apply to the entire project area. Floor area ratios shall be calculated on net acreage. (a) The maximum floor area for developments in this District shall be calculated with the following multiples: Lot Size Maximum FAR less than half block 2.0 one-half block-full block 2.5 full block or greater 3.0 (b) The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall be 35 units per net acre. 4.5.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be as follows: Lot Size Height less than full block 3 stories/,A )W.. full block or greater 4 storiesWI5'kV 4.5.05 Maximum Site Coverage. No maximum site coverage required 4.5.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be fifteen (15) feet. Exception: Parcels fronting on Fifth and Third Streets may be reduced to five (5) feet. Parcels fronting on Main Street must develop to a build-to-line* within five (5) feet from the property line. Downtown Specific Plan -30- (1913D) *Note: The build-to requirement can be satisfied by extending any of the following to within five (5) feet of the property line: 1) the facade of the ground floor level; 2) a plaza or patio used for open-air commercial activity; 3) a-low-wall or fence (not exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height), planters or other architectural features, which extend along at least fifty (50) percent of the frontage along the lot line; 4) two (2) side walls and second story facade. Note: The following may be permitted in the front yard setback on 6th Street, 5th Street, 3rd Street, Main Street, First Street and PCH: benches, bicycle racks, transparent wind screens and open-air commercial facilities. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required for parcels fronting on PCH of five (5) feet, for additional parkway and sidewalk; and two and one-half(2-1/2) for parcels fronting on Sixth Street. 4.5.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum aggregate side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Parcels fronting on Sixth, Second and Lake Streets require twenty (20) percent of lot frontage, with not less than seven (7) feet for an interior yard and not less than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. (b) Parcels fronting on Fifth, Main and Third Streets and Pacific Coast Highway require zero for an interior yard. Exterior side yard requirements shall equal the front yard setback for the respective street. 4.5.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Structures may be cantilevered to the rear property line. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to widen the alley to thirty (30) feet. 4.5.09 Setback (Upper Story). Upper story setbacks for this District shall be as follows: (a) Parcels fronting PCH, 6th, 2nd and LAAk 1st Streets require all stories above the second to be set back an average of twenty-five (25) feet from the ultimate street ROW. Up to fifty (50) percent of the building frontage may be set back fifteen (15) feet from the ROW, providing that the average setback on upper stories is no less than twenty-five (25) feet. (b) Parcels fronting on 5th and 3rd Street require that any part of the building facade above the second story shall be set back ten (10) feet from the first story facade_ (c) Parcels fronting on Main Street require that no building or portion of a building above the second story shall be within WO&WErVi (2M ten (10) feet of the build-to line. Downtown Specific Plan -31- (1913D) (d) That portion of structures exceeding thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back a minimum of ten (10) feet from the interior side yard property line. 4.5.10 Open Space. All development projects within this District shall provide a public open space amenity. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the net site area must be provided for such a purpose. (a) Full block developments on Main Street require public plazas at the corner of PCH and Main Street. These street level public plazas shall be incorporated into the design of the development and approved by the Director. Such plazas shall have the following characteristics: • Location: street level corner; one side must face Main Street. • Area: not less than one thousand (1,000) square feet excluding public right-of-way. • Landscaping: not less than thirty (30) percent of the plaza area should be planted. • Paving: all paved areas shall be textured. • Visual Feature: plazas must include a sculpture, fountain, information kiosk, pond, display, or similar visual amenity. • Public Seating shall be provided. • Open Air Commercial: not more than fifty (50) percent of the plaza area may be used for open air commercial uses. 415111 Pr��d�d�N�(7�G�b�f���!/�B'�d�f6�f�{�slstag/tShH�f¢ sl��i/t6�lf�.flttrb��d/tad �fi/�/�bbfdit�ibfDi/Mf/M�f�bhf�/9Mt/�ftS�h��tr/,f3�5f�lDLt/dt�/df/fYlt`iY�f- Mbd'A( bf I ff 1#"4 i1*VJYff/AhWMHff ifI1 DMWUAY/ffYaY1*YA/Mh'W Downtown Specific Plan -32- (1913D) 4.6 DISTRICT #4: MIXED-USE: OFFICE RESIDENTIAL Purpose. This District flanks the Downtown core area, separating the area along Main Street from the outlying areas which are primarily residential. The purpose of this District is to provide a transition zone between the existing residential areas to the commercial Main Street corridor. Consequently, mixes of offfice and residential uses are permitted. Boundaries. District #4 includes the blocks on the northwest side of the Main Street core area from 6th Street to 5th Street and from 3rd Street to First Street, between Walnut and Orange Avenues. Downtown Specific Plan -33- (1913D) REMOVED FROM DISTRICT 4 AND ADDED TO DISTRICT 5 PECAN ORANGE I OLIVE I I N N N N N H WALNUT x z " N p z O N z Lu = zz_ O F- LL Lu Z N LL PACIFIC COAST HWY. PACIFIC OCEAN ,m DISTRICT 4 1 R DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION 4.6.01 Permitted Uses. The following principal uses and structures flAl K6 06YdAkfW may be allowed in District #4 subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: (a) Residential Use - all t,gdWY'MVhW!iAHMdfvig/ifi(tj&fMillylifid multi-family housing, apartments, condominiums and stock cooperatives. ffdtY1ffvifgY0(1FA4ivi *1Uc(fAW0(d1IYM AWMNtNb6f&M1*VNkZYd d�tl�Yd¢tYS,bl:ft��'tfalvld�(t's�hh�dYt�lt�di(a�t�/1#?/gY�ld/Fb�lgdaY,y�4it�/tf�fftiN�/��rb6f�f>4,1/df ;fY�d7�igN���(di,�b/B6f�td/Yid/ISbti�l9ial�Kd�`i8'i�d6f2'alY,(��-l�ffvltY. (b) Office Use - professional, general business and non-profit offices. (c) Mixed-Use - Mixed Residential/Office Use developments shall be permitted provided that residential uses: Be segregated to separate structure or restricted to the second story or above; Not occupy any portion of the same story with non-residential uses, unless they are provided with adequate physical and acoustical separation; Be on contiguous floors within a single str-.:.ure; Be provided with separate pedestrian ingress and egress; Be provided with secured, designated parking. (d) Commercial Use - Commercial uses which are integrated within and clearly incidental to an office use, shall be permitted provided that it cumulatively does not exceed ten (10) percent of total gross floor areas of the development. (e) Residential or commercial uses are permitted along the ground floor frontage on 5th Street between Olive and Orange Avenues. 4.6.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be twenty-five hundred (2500) square feet and twenty (25) feet of frontage. However, existing lots gt�a't��t/YM�NdiIfiy/�SOJJ/9�kif/tvI/ M twenty-five (25) feet in width or greater shall not be subdivided to create smaller parcels. 4.6.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall be Lot Size (Frontage) Maximum Allowable Density Less than 50' 1 du 51' - 100, 30 units net acre 10F - full block 35 units net acre • 4.6.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be tI'Yf*14"(89yd'AYWY lvWno more than three (3) stories. Downtown Specific Plan -34- (1913D) 4.6.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. 4.6.06 Setback i(Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height, shall be fifteen (15) feet. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required for parcels fronting on Sixth Street, of two and one-half (2-1/2). 4.6.07 Setback:(Side Yard). The minimum aggregate side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Parcels with one hundred (100) feet or less of frontage require twenty (20) percent of the lot frontage, with not less than three (3) feet on a side. Exterior yards require not less than five (5) feet from a public ROW. Exception: Garages located on a single twenty-five (25) foot wide lot., will be allowed an exterior yard reduction to not less than three (3) feet from a public ROW. * Note: Twenty-five (25) foot wide lots may have a zero interior side yard setback on one side if: 1) adjacent property is under same ownership and developed at the same time; 2) at least five (5) feet is provided on the opposite side yard of both properties; 3) no portion of a building at a zero lot line is closer than six (6) feet to an adjacent building, if the buildings are not abutting. (b) Parcels with greater than one hundred (100) feet but less than a half block of frontage require twenty (20) percent of the frontage, with not less than seven (7) feet on any interior yard, and not less than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. (c) Parcels with greater than a half block of frontage require not less than seven (7) feet on any interior yard and not less than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. 4.6.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Structures may be cantilevered to the rear property line. Note: An additional ROW dedication may be required to widen the alley to ffi ty/f3.0h twenty-four (24) feet. 4.6.09 Setback (Upper Story). The covered portion of all stories above the second shall be set back an average of twenty-five (25) feet from the ultimate ROW. Up to fifty (50) percent of the building frontage may be set back fifteen (15) feet from the ROW, providing that the average setback on upper stories is no less than twenty-five (25) feet. That portion of structures which exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back a minimum of forty-five (45) feet from the exterior property lines. 4.6.10 Open Space. No public open space shall be required in this District. i Downtown Specific Plan -35- (1913D) 4.7 DISTRICT #5: MIXED-USE; COMMERCIAL/OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL Purpose. This District includes the blocks on either side of and including Main Street, and constitutes the oldest commercial area in the City. The purpose of this District is to re-establish the area as the Downtown for the City by creating a more urban atmosphere, encouraging relatively higher intensity development with viable commercial office and residential uses. View corridors along with height and orientation restrictions in the development requirements of this District are intended to focus development on the Main Street corridor. The Main Street-pier axis is intended to be an active, vital and interesting pedestrian way, intersecting with and complementing the visitor-serving commercial area on PCH and the pier area. The District promotes mixed uses of commercial, office and residential developments. Boundaries. District #5 includes the area from Sth Street to 3rd Street between Walnut and Orange Avenues. i Downtown Specific Plan -36- (1913D) ADDED TO DISTRICT 5 FROM DISTRICT 4 � UUU PECAN ORANGE wo OLIVE N F=- N WALNUT S JL S N N o ] zJL z OJLEE z W h = z O LL N LL PACIFIC COAST HWY. PACW-IC OCEAN m DISTRICT 5 Ri DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DMSION 4.7.01 Permitted Uses. (a) New construction and establishment of a commercial core which serves as the transition between visitor-serving and year round commercial uses in District #5 may be O&WAAA l allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. For Example: • Antique stores Art gallery Bakeries • Banks and savings and loans branch offices • Barber, beauty, manicure shops • Beach, swimming and surfing equipment • Bicycle sales, rental and repair • Boat and marine supplies • Bookstores Boutiques • Clothing stores Delicatessens • Drug stores • Dry cleaning • Florist • General Retail • Groceries • Hardware stores Hobby supplies Ice cream parlors • Jewelry stores Laundromats • Newstands • Offices • Office supplies • Photographic processing • Shoe repair • Shoe stores Sporting goods • Tailor shops • Travel agency • Other related uses (b) A change to the following uses in District #5 may be allowed subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: • Health and sports clubs • Liquor stores - Live entertainment • Permanent parking lots and parking structures Residential uses • Restaurants (c) The ground floor area or street level of all buildings fronting Main Street in this District shall be devoted to commercial activities. (1) Commercial or residential may be permitted on the ground floor between Olive and Orange Avenue fronting 5th Street and 3rd Street. Downtown Specific Plan -37- (1913D) (d) The following uses may be permitted above the first floor: (i) Commercial Use — all commercial uses allowed on the first floor if the uses are a continuation from the first floor use. (ii) Office Use — professional, general business and non—profit offices provided that: • No sales either wholesale or retail which involve delivery of any goods or material to or from the premises occur. • No inventory is kept on the premise other than samples. • No processing, manufacturing, storage or repair of merchandise of any kind occurs. (iii) Residential Use — Residential uses are allowed only in conjunction with commercial uses in this District. Up to one—third (1/3) of the floor area of projects on parcels smaller than a full block may be devoted to residential uses; projects on full block or larger parcels, up to one—half (1/2) of the floor area may be devoted to residential uses provided that residential uses in addition to the following: • Be segregated to a separate structure or restricted to the second story or above; • Not occupy any portion of the same story with non—residential uses, unless they are provided with adequate physical and acoustical separation; • Be on contiguous floors within a single structure; • Be provided with separate pedestrian ingress and egress; • Be provided with secured, designated parking. 4.7.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be twenty—five hundred (2500) square feet and twenty—five (25) feet of frontage. 4.7.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum intensity of development shall be calculated by floor area ratio (FAR) for this District. The floor area ratio shall apply to the entire project area. Floor area ratios shall be 2.0 calculated on net acreage. Downtown Specific Plan —38— (1913D) (a) The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall be 1 du/1,742 square feet net lot area or 25 du net acre. 4.7.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be as follows: Lot Size (Frontage) Height less than a full block 3 storiesA40'iffd. full block 4 storiesAW)W.. 4.7.05 Maximum Site Coverage. No maximum site coverage shall be required in this District. 4.7.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be fifteen (15) feet. Exception: Parcels fronting on Fifth and Third Streets may be reduced to five (5) feet and parcels fronting on Main Street must develop within(5) feet of the property line. *Note: The build-to requirement can be satisfied by extending any of the following to within five (5) feet of the property line: 1) the facade of the ground floor level; 2) a plaza or patio used for open-air commercial activity; 3) a low-wall or fence (not exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height), planters or other architectural features, which extend along at least fifty (50) percent of the frontage along the lot line; 4) two (2) side walls and second story facade. Note: The following may be permitted in the front yard setback on Fifth Street, Third Street and Main Street benches, bicycle racks, transparent wind screens and open-air commercial facilities. 4.7.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Interior yard requirements shall be zero. (b) Exterior yards require five (5) feet from a public ROW. 4.7.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Structures may be cantilevered to the rear property line. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to widen the alley to thirty (30) feet. 4.7.09 Setback (Upper Story). The covered portion of all stories above the second shall be set back an average of an additional ten (10) feet from the second story facade. 4.7.10 Open Space. Parcels having one hundred (100) feet or more of street frontage, within this District shall provide a public open space amenity. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the net site area must be provided for such a purpose, in all non-residential development. Downtown Specific Plan -39- (1913D) Exception: Mixed use developments which include residential units, may reduce the public open space to five (5) percent of the net site area. (a) Full block developments on Main Street require public plazas. These street level public plazas shall be incorporated into the design of the development and approved by the Director. Such plazas shall have the following characteristics: • Location: street level corner; one side must face Main Street. • Area: not less than one thousand (1,000) square feet excluding public right-of--way. • Landscaping: not less than thirty (30) percent of the plaza area should be planted. • Paving: all paved areas shall be textured. • Visual Feature: plaza must include a sculpture, fountain, information kiosk, pond, display, or similar visual amenity. • Public Seating shall be provided. • Open Air Commercial: not more than fifty (50) percent of the privately owned publicly used plaza area may be used for open air commercial uses. This provision will be subject to the standards outlined in the Carts and Kiosks Ordinance. Downtown Specific Plan -40- (1913D) 4.8 DISTRICT #6: MIXED USE: COMMERCIAL/OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL Purpose. This District encompasses the area north of the Downtown core and includes the public library. It is intended to provide a location for neighborhood commercial enterprises to serve surrounding residents, as well as office space, public facilities and residential uses. This mixed use node will anchor the inland end of the Main/Pier corridor. Boundaries. District #6 consists of the blocks located between Sixth Street and Lake Street from Orange Avenue to Palm Avenue. Downtown Specific Plan —41— (1913D) PALM ACACIA sl PECAN ORANGE cn N 0 d' N N N N N N N � N WALNUT z Z IL I JL= -- JL EE u Z = Z z y uj JLLJJ In F N cn LL PACIFIC COAST HWY. m DISTRICT 6 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION 4.8.01 Permitted Uses. (a) New construction and establishment of new commercial and/or mixed- projects which cater to year round residents in Distric- .: maybe 66WAU.hd allowed subject to the approval of a Condi ..:vial Use Permit. FhVAZAM6�W: • Antique Stores • Banks • Bicycle sales, rental and repair Bookstores Clothing stores Delicatessens • Drug stores • Dry Cleaning • Florists • Glass Shops • Groceries Hardware stores • Ice House • Laundromats, laundries • Newstands • Offices Office supplies • Public facilities • Restaurants • Shoe repair Sporting goods • Other related uses Existing auto uses may remain (b) A change to the following uses in Distric. may be allowed subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: Health and sports clubs • Liquor stores Live entertainment • Permanent parking lots and parking structures • Residential uses • Restaurants (c) Residential uses are allowed in conjunction and/or separate from commer.z:al uses in this district subject to conditional use permit except for single family dwellings. (d) The frontage on 3rd and Lake Streets between Orange and Palm Avenues may be residential. 4.8.02 Minimum Parcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be ftyf�/tYibtt�l� ,(8/,0A0) two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet and fffty/(/ y twenty-five (25) feet of frontage. Existing parcels greater than twenty-five (25) feet in width shall not be subdivided to create 2,500 square foot lots. Downtown Specific Plan -42- (1913D) 4.8.03 Ma imum Density/Intensity. The maximum intensity of development shall be calculated by floor area ratio (FAR) for this District. The floor area ratio shall apply to the entire project area. Floor area ratios shall be calculated on net acreage. (a) The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units shall be 1 du/1,742 square feet net lot area or twenty-five (25) units per net acre. (b) Lot Siz Maximum F.A.R. Less than half-block 2.0 Half-block to full block 2.5 Full block or greater 3.0 4.8.04 Ma2jimurn Building Height. The maximum building height shall be as follows: Lot Size (Frontage) Height less than 100' 2 stories AWMelf 100' up to but less than 3 stories I-M)WOt a full block full block 4 stories AA9N& 4.8.05 Ma2jimurn Site Coverage. No maximum site coverage shall be required in this District. 4.8.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be fifteen (15) feet; Exception: Parcels fronting on Fifth and Third Streets may be reduced to five (5) feet and parcels fronting on Main Street must develop within (5) feet of the property line. *Note: The build-to requirement can be satisfied by extending any of the following to within five (5) feet of the property line: 1) the facade of the ground floor level; 2) a plaza or patio used for open-air commercial activity; 3) a low-wall or fence (not exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height), planters or other architectural features, which extend along at least fifty (50) percent of the frontage along the lot line; 4) two (2) side walls and second story facade. Note: The following may be permitted in the front yard setback on Fifth Street, Third Street and Main Street: benches, bicycle racks, transparent wind screens and open-air commercial facilities. 4.8.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Interior yard requirements, for residential development, shall be ten (10) feet; non residential may be reduced to zero. (b) Exterior yards require not less than fifteen (15) feet, from a public ROW (corner lots). Downtown Specific Plan -43- (1913D) 4.8.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to widen the alley to tlVH*/(301) twenty-four (24) feet. 4.8.09 Setback (Upper Storx). The covered portions of all stories above the second shall be set back twenty-five (25) feet from the ultimate ROW. 4.8.10 Open Space. Parcels having one hundred (100) feet or more of street frontage, within this District shall provide a public open space amenity. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the net site area must be provided for such a purpose, in all non-residential development. Exception: Mixed use developments which include residential units, may reduce the public open space to five (5) percent of the net site area. Full block developments on Main Street require public plazas. These street level public plazas shall be incorporated into the design of the development and approved by the Director. • Downtown Specific Plan -44- (1913D) 4.9 DISTRICT #7: VISITOR—SERVING COMMERCIAL Purpose. This District extends southeast of the Downtown core adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway. The principal purpose of this District is to provide commercial facilities to serve seasonal visitors to the beaches as well as to serve local residents on a year round basis. This District also provides a continuous commerical link between the Downtown and the visitor—commercial/recreation District near Beach Boulevard. Boundaries. District #7 extends from LM(k 1st Street to Huntington Avenue between PCH and the proposed Walnut Avenue extension. Downtown Specific Plan —45— (1913D) 4.9.01 Permitted Uses. (a) New construction and establishment of the following uses in District #7 iMWt6&6& dAkt fl may be allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Change of use shall be subject to the approval of the Director. A. Antique stores Art gallery B. Bakeries (No more than seven (7) employees) Banks and savings and loans branch offices (not to exceed five-thousand (5,000) square feet) Barber, beauty, manicure shops Beach, swimming and surfing equipment Bicycle sales, rental and repair Boat and marine supplies Bookstores Botanical Gardens Boutiques C. Clothing stores Coin, stamp and art dealers Confectioners Curio shops D. Delicatessens F. Florists Fruit and vegetable stores G. Game Stores Gifts and party shops Groceries (convenience) I. Ice cream parlors J. Jewelry stores L. Laundromats M. Marine insurance Meat or fish markets N. Newspaper and magazine stores Newstands Novelties P. Photographic studios Photographic equipment sales Photographic processing (no more than one (1) developing machine) Professional Office (not to exceed fifty [50] percent of total floor area) Downtown Specific Plan -46- (1913D) S. Shoe stores Sporting goods T. Tourist related public and semi—public buildings, services and facilities Travel agency Y. Yacht sales (display only) Note: Visiter—serving commercial uses must be a part of all development proposals in this District, with a minimum requirement that the entire street level be devoted to Visitor—Serving Commercial Uses. (b) New construction, establishment, or a change to the following uses in District #7 may be ObiAtv9kkW allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit: A. Arcades Automobile service stations C. Cabarets D. Dance halls and discos Dancing and/or live entertainment as a primary or accessory use H. Health and sports clubs Hotels and motels L. Liquor stores P. Permanent parking lots and parking structures R. Reducing salon Restaurants Retail sales, outdoor T. Taverns 4.9.02 Minimum Parcel Size. No minimum parcel size shall be required for this District. However, prior to the approval of any development, a master site plan for the entire District shall be approved by the Planning Commission. Development which is in conformance with the site plan may then be permitted. 4.9.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. T dIAYdklzWAWYid~bf/dW61 AilsylaY iAB6(ih&U/;i kbYAhk(ldvlitilc(loi6ikbVAW2f1/Rlbfdt/aff&t"bYfihMIM G�1 b4tlFalt��d/6N�bfsl�fa��t,��,���fEk�ft�/t�f�i/YM�I t�t/1 k,It i�'kkbbb',�(a��/�ff��/fibft 6MOWby)VW0'1d AHBfiAWAA/5ytMMVkhW4f&hfY t'ld/fYdbUAtb`al t.�1,bU1Fal��d/15�t�t'bSkb',��! (a) The maximum floor area for developments in this District shall be calculated with a multiple of 3.0. Downtown Specific Plan —47— (1913D) 4.9.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be eight (8) stories. 4.9.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum ,site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. 4.9.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be fifty (SO) feet from PCH. 4.9.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum exterior side yard requirement shall be twenty (20) feet. 4.9.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet from the proposed Walnut Avenue extension. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to provide for the Walnut Avenue extension. 4.9.09 Setback (Upper Story). No upper story setback shall be required in this District. 4.9.10 Open Space. A public open space and/or pedestrian access amenity, subject to approval of the Director, may be required for development projects in order to assure a predominantly visitor-serving orientation. 4.9.11 Corridor Dedication. Development in District #7 shall require the dedication of a twenty (20) foot corridor between Atlanta Avenue and PCH for public access between the southern end of the Pacific Electric ROW and PCH. This requirement may be waived iF an alternative public amenity is provided or if the corridor is deemed unnecessary by the City. Any proposal for an alternative public amenity must be approved by the Planning Commission. 4.9.12 Mobilehome District. A portion of District #7 is zoned for mobilehome use. Within this mobilehome area, the provisions of the Mobilehome District of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall apply (See Section 4.16). The Mobilehome Overlay may only be removed as set forth in the Specific Plan subject to compliance with the provisions of the Mobilehome Overlay Zones/Removal/Rezoning/Change of Use Article of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Downtown Specific Plan -48- (1913D) 4.10 DISTRICT #8: - HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Purim. This District is intended to allow high density residential uses. New residential development will provide a population base to help support the commercial and office uses in the Downtown area. Boundaries. District #8 includes two consolidated parcels; one parcel is bounded on the north by Atlanta Avenue, on the east by Huntington Street, on the south by the proposed Walnut Extension and on the west by Lake Street. The second includes the area north of the proposed Walnut Avenue extension between Huntington Street and Beach Boulevard. i 4.10.01 Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted in District #8 subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. These uses shall be limited to permanently attached residential uses; including multi-family housing, condominiums, stock-cooperatives or apartments. Downtown Specific Plan -49- (1913D) 4.10.02 Minimum Parcel Size. No minimum parcel size shall be required in this District. However, prior to approval of any development, a conceptual plan for Subarea a or Subarea b shall be approved by the Planning Commission. Development which is in conformance with the site plan may then be permitted. 4.10.03 Maximum DensityAntensity. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units shall be thirty-five (35) units per Obt& net acre. 4.10.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building height shall be ftffy (5041VOW four (4) stories. 4.10.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of net site area. 4.10.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be twenty (20) feet. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to provide for the Walnut Avenue extension. 4.10.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum exterior side yard requirement shall be twenty (20) feet. Exception: The minimum exterior yard requirement from Beach Boulevard shall be twenty-five (25) feet. 4.10.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet. 4.10.09 Setback (Upper Storx). That portion of structures which exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from the northern exterior property line. 4.10.10 Open Space. No public open space shall be required in this District. 4.10.11 Corridor Dedication. Development in District #8 shall require the dedication of a twenty (20) foot corridor between Atlanta Avenue and PCH for public access between the southern end of the Pacific Electric ROW and PCH. This requirement may be waived if an alternative public amenity is provided or if the corridor is deemed unnecessary by the City. Any proposal for an alternative public amenity must be approved by the Planning Commission. 4.10.12 Resource Production Overlay. A portion. of District #8 is designated with an oil suffix (0,01). Within this area all the requirements of the Resource Production Overlay shall apply (see Section 4.14). 4.10.13 Conservation Overlay. A portion of District #8 has been designated with a conservation overlay. Within this area all requirements of the Conservation Overlay shall apply (see Section 4.15). Downtown Specific Plan -50- (1913D) 4.10.14 Mobilehome District. A portion of District #8 is zoned for mobilehome use. Within this mobilehome zoning area, the provisions of the Mobilehome District of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall apply (see Section 4.16). i Downtown Specific Plan -51- (1913D) 4.11 DISTRICT #9: . DMMERCIAURECREATION Purpose. The purpose of this District is to encourage large, coordinated development that is beach-oriented and open to the public for both commercial and recreational purposes. Boundaries. District #9 is bounded by PCH on the south, Beach Boulevard on the east, Huntington Street on the west, and on the north by the proposed Walnut Avenue extension. Downtown Specific Plan -52- (1913D) 4.11.01 Permitted Uses. The following uses and structures ftM1t6A16&oVAktW may be allowed in District #9 are subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. These commercial uses include hotels, motels, restaurants and recreational facilities. 4.11.02 Minimum Parcel Size. No minimum parcel size shall be required for this District. However, prior to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission for any development, a master site plan for the entire District shall be approved by the Planning Commission. Development which is in conformance with the site plan may then be permitted. 4.11.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum intensity of development shall be calculated by floor area ratio (FAR) for this District. The floor area ratio shall apply to the entire project area. Floor area ratios shall be calculated on net acreage. (a) The maximum floor area for developments in this District shall be calculated with a multiple of 3.5. 4.11.04 Maximum Building Height. No maximum building height shall be required. 4.11.05 Maximum Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage shall be thirty-five (35) percent of the net site area. Note: A maximum of twenty-five (25) percent of the net site area can be used for parking and vehicular accessways. • 4.11.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be fifty (50) feet, from PCH and Beach Boulevard. 4.11.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum exterior side yard requirement shall be twenty (20) feet. Exception: The minimum exterior yard requirement from Beach Boulevard shall be fifty (50) feet. 4.11.08 Setback (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to provide for the Walnut Avenue extension. 4.11.09 Setback (Upper Story). No upper story setback shall be required. i Downtown Specific Plan -53- (1913D) 4.11.10 Qpen Space. Development projects within this District shall provide a public open space amenity. A minimum of twenty-five (25) percent of the net site area must be provided for such a purpose., This area should be available for public or semi-public uses for recreational purposes. Open space must have minimum dimensions of twenty-five (25) feet in each direction . Paved areas devoted to streets, driveways and parking areas may not be counted toward this requirement. A maximum of fifteen (15) percent of the required twenty-five (25) percent may be enclosed recreation space such as gyms, handball courts, health clubs, interpretive centers or similar facilities. A fee may be imposed for the use of such facilities. 4.11.11 Pedestrian Overpass. A pedestrian overpass may be required to connect the development in this District to the City Beach, as a condition of approval for any new development on, or further subdivision of, parcels within the District. The City may waive this requirement if the City determines that overpasses are unnecessary or impractical considering the type and design of new developments. 4.11.12 Mobilehome District. A portion of District #9 is zoned for mobilehome use. Within this mobilehome area, the provisions of the Mobilehome District of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall apply (see Section 4.16). Downtown Specific Plan -54- (1913D) 4.12 DISTRICT *10: PIER-RELATED COMMERCIAL Purpose. This District is intended to provide for commercial uses on and alongside the pier which will enhance and expand the public's use and enjoyment of this area. Uses are encouraged which capitalize on the views available from the pier and the unique recreational or educational opportunities it affords. At the same time, care must be exercised to insure that the major portion of the pier will remain accessible to the public at no charge, for strolling, fishing or observation. Bbri��d'af�!��!//D'r� �i'Y0/tip.I��hM�/�i�tl�Yf/,�fd/�f✓�t,�a��ft�l�firNg/ >f i�Lty/(801)/9��/���fdfiY�k/�fi�4/�fal�/�hKkJ�I,E/YSirhfdt�,�Nd/f�yliy P1`2byi�rl blt h�H�lsid �>fil�'iK�/df l t'bl�I kdt�+,�HJ/M�d dt�b+lt�ti�d/i�!/troi� D'Mbb H12fhttYW.El9/l fd/9ddtzi/PQIf�t6fftiN�/stet ,/ Dldrlt +�bLtt�M�. r/bf tYWtAW ,6W2(W&b &12(fffh�t�M�6✓��f/df/t Boundaries. Shall be consistent with the Coastal Element of the General Plan. Downtown Specific Plan -55- (1913D) 4.12.01 Permitted Uses. New construction and establishment of the following uses may be O&ddALt6K allowed in District #10 subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: Note: Only parking uses are permitted in this District northwest of Sixth Street. 4.12.02 Minimum Parcel Size. No minimum parcel size shall be required in this District. 4.12.03 Maximum Density/Intensity. No maximum density or intensity requirement shall be applied in this District. 4.12.04 Maximum Height. The maximum building heights shall be twenty-five (25) feet and no more than two (2) stories above the pier level. Exception: The maximum building height on the pier (excluding the end of the pier cafe) and northwest of the pier shall be one (1) story. No maximum building height shall be required for lifeguard towers or other facilities necessary for public safety. No parking surface or structure shall exceed the adjacent elevation of PCH. 4.12.05 Maximum Site Coverage. No maximum site coverage shall be required. Exception: No more than twenty-five (25) percent of the pier shall be covered by any building or roofed structure. In addition, buildings or other roofed structures shall not be constructed along more than twenty-five (25) percent of the perimeter of the pier. 4.12.06 Setback (Front Yard). No minimum front yard setback shall be required. 4.12.07 Setback (Side Yard). No minimum side yard setback shall be required. 4.12.08 Setback (Rear Yard). No minimum rear yard setback shall be required. 4.12.09 Setback (Upper Storx). No minimum upper story setback shall be required. 4.12.10 Open Space. Public open space and pedestrian access shall be major considerations of development in this District. All new development shall provide sufficient clear width along the length of the pier for public access, emergency and service vehicles. In addition, public walkways along the pier edge or around the perimeter of new development must be provided. Downtown Specific Plan -56- (1913D) 4.13 DISTRICT #11: BEACH OPEN SPACE Purpose. This District is intended to preserve and protect the sandy beach area within the Downtown Specific Plan boundaries while allowing parking and auxilliary beach-related commercial and convenience uses. Approximately half of the beach frontage in the District is City beach; the remainder is owned by the State of California. Boundaries. District #11 is bounded by PCH on one side and the Pacific Ocean on the other. The District extends from Goldenwest Street to Beach Boulevard, except for the area which is part of District #10. i Downtown Specific Plan -57- (1913D) 4.13.01 Permitted Uses. New construction and establishment of the following uses in District #11 MvIIA46166MUM may be allowed subject to approval of the Design Review Board. • Access facilities Basketball Courts Beach concession stands* Bicycle trails and support facilities • Fire rings • Paddleboard courts Parking lots that will not result in the loss of recreational sand area. Tiered parking is permitted within the Downtown Specific Plan area on existing lots seaward of Pacific Coast Highway provided the parking is designed so that the top of the structures including walls, etc., are located a minimum of one foot below the maximum height of the adjacent bluff. Park offices + playground equipment Public restrooms Public transit facilities and associated structures, dressing rooms or showers** • Shoreline construction that may alter natural shoreline process, such as groins, cliff retaining walls, pipelines, outfalls that are designed to eliminate adverse impacts on local shoreline sand su • pply • Trails (bicycle or jogging) ,and support facilities • Volleyball net supports *Note: Beach concession stands shall be: limited to twenty-five hundred (2500) square feet and spaced at intervals no closer than one thousand (1,000) feet. Beach concession structures shall be located within or immediately adjacent to paved parking or access areas. **Note: Public transit facilities may only be constructed within the existing paved parking areas or in areas which are not part of the beach. 4.13.02 Minimum Parcel Size. No minimum parcel size shall be required . 4.13.03 Maximum DensityAntensity. No maximum density or intensity requirement shall be applied in this District. 4.13.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building heights shall be limited to twenty (20) feet. Exceptions: No maximum building height shall be required for lifeguard towers or other facilities necessary for ;public safety. No parking surface or structure shall exceed the adjacent elevation of PCH. Downtown Specific Plan -58- (1913D) 4.13.05 Maximum Site Coverage. No maximum site coverage shall be required. 4.13.06 Setback (Front Yard). No minimum front yard setback shall be required. 4.13.07 Setback (Side Yard). No minimum side yard setback shall be required. 4.13.08 Setback (Rear Yard). No minimum rear yard setback shall be required . 4.13.09 Setback (Upper Story). No minimum upper story setback shall be required. 4.13.10 Open Space. Public open space and pedestrian access shall be major considerations of development in this District. 4.13.11 Parking. No additional parking shall be required for new development in this District. Construction which proposes the removal of existing parking, shall provide for the replacement of that parking on a one-for-one basis within the District. 4.13.12 Resource Production Overlay. A portion of District #11 is designated with an Oil Suffix (0,01). Within this area, all the requirements of the Resource Production Overlay shall apply (see Section 4.14). Downtown Specific Plan -59- (1913D) • OIL DISTRICT OVERLAY MAP • Figure 4.14 Downtown Specific Plan -61- (1913D) 4.14 RESOURCE PRODUCTION OVERLAY Purpose. The Downtown Specific Plan area overlies long-poductive oil pools. Many facilities are still operating because of the extent of the remaining reserves, therefore oil production will continue to be permitted in parts of this area. The City provides for oil facilities by designating oil "suffix" zoning Districts in conjection with an underlying base zone such as a commercial or residential District. Both oil facilities allowed by suffix and the other uses allowed by the base zone are permitted. Currently, the City has two oil suffixes the "0" which allows existing oil wells and attendant facilities but no new wells, and the "01" which allows the drilling of new wells in addition to all uses in the "0" District. These suffixes, with certain modifications, are also employed in this Specific Plan. In addition to the oil suffixes three Resource Production Overlays have been identified. Existing and/or expanded oil production may continue in these areas provided that the additional conditions outlined in this subsection are met. 4.14.01 Oil Overlay "A" The regulations in this overlay District facilitate continued oil recovery, but require all new facilities to be concentrated into a screened, soundproofec and landscaped expansion of the existing oil site and encourage the expeditious removal of existing wells from oil overlay "B". Boundaries. Oil overlay "A" includes an existing oil island located in District #2, between 19th and 18th streets from Pacific Csast Highway to the area is Walnut Avenue. Regulations. New wells and related facilities shall be permitted in accordance with the -01 suffix and related provisions in the the Huntington Beach Ordiance Code provided, however;. that the following additional conditions are met: (a) Any new well must be part of a secondary or other enhanced oil recovery project of used as a replacement of an existing well. (b) A schec-t, for abandonment of all wells operated by the project proponent which are iacated within Bolsa Chica State Beach shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Development Services prior to the drilling of any new well. This schedule may be amended • at the discretion of the Director of Development Services. Downtown Specific Plan -62- (1913D) (c) The project proponent shall agree to a memorandum of understanding with the City as a condition for approval, stating that no new wells shall be drilled by that company on Bolsa Chica State Beach (oil overlay "B") nor shall the existing wells be redrilled except, in such cases where: 1) the redrilled well will be produced by a "subsurface" or "down-hole" pump, only, or 2) the redrilled well will be produced by other new technology with fewer visual and environmental impacts than a conventional ball and plunger, pump, or 3) an intensified screening plan is approved the the Director of Development Services which substantially improves the appearance of the area. (d) The operation site hall be screened by a wall, fence, or structure in keeping with the character of the area. The site shall also be landscaped so as to ensure visual compatibility with the surriounding area. A screening and landscaping plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director. All structures shall generally conform to the height limits and setback requirements of the base District. The Director may waive these restriction if it would result in better overall soundproffing, odor reduction and/or visual compatibility. 4.14.02 Oil Overlay "B" The regulations in this overlay faciliate continued oil recovery, wells may be redrilled if surface pumping units are replaced with a subsurface ones. Drilling of new wells may be permitted but only if the result is a significate reduction in the amount of space used for oil operations on the beach. Boundaries. Oil overlay "B" comprises a section of Bolsa Chica State Beach currently in oil producthon in District #11 between Goldenwest and 11th streets. Regulations. Wells may be redrilled in accordance with the -0 suffix in the Huntington Beach Ordiance Code provided, however, that the following additional conditions are met: (a) The operator submits a report to the Department of Development Services explaning why there is no other feasible, environmentally less damaging inland site (such a report must be approved by the Director); or agrees to a memorandum of understanding with the City stating that the redrilled well will be produced by a subsurface or down-hole pump or other new technology with fewer visual and environmental impacts than a conventional ball and plunger pump. (b) A schedule for abandonment of all wells operated by the project proponent which are located within Bolsa Chica State Beach shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Development Services prior to the drilling of any new well. This schedule may be amended at the discretion of the Director of Development Services. (c) All redrilling operations shall be limited to a period from October 1 to May 31, except for emergencies for which the Fire Chief may waive these seasonal restrictions, but shall require soundproffing in • accordance with Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. Downtown Specific Plan -63- (1913D) New wells may be permitted if they are part of an overall consolidation plan which significantly reduces the area used for oil facilities or expedites the removal of existing oil facilities within the overlay area. A consolidation plan must be submitted to the Director of Development Services for approval before a permit for drilling any :new well will be issued. All drilling operations must be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the 01 suffix in the Huntington Beach Ordiance Code. 4.14.03 Oil Overlay "C" The regulations in the overlay facilitate continued oil recovery and provides for future oil production needs. Boundaries. Oil overlay "C" is an irregularly shaped site in District #8A between Lake Street and Huntington Avenue and Atlanta Avenue. Rezulations. Well drilling and redrilling shall be permitted in accordance with Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and with the 0 or 01 suffix and related provisions in the Huntington Beach Ordiance Code. A conceptual site plan for the entire overlay area must be submitted prior to permitting any project development or subdivision of land within the overlay. The plan shall include at least one (1) oil island of not less than two (2) acres in size for new oil well drilling and oil production. Such island(s) shall be incorporated into the overall development plan so that noise, odor and visual impacts on the residences are minimized, and safe access to the oil site(s) is provided. Findings that at least one such island so designed is incorporated into the plan shall be made by the Planning Commission before approving any development project. Downtown Specific Plan -64- (1913D) • 4.15 CONSERVATION OVERLAY Purpose. The conservation overlay is intended to regulate those areas which have been preliminarily identified as wetlands. Upon determination by the California Department of Fish and Game that an area is classified as a wetland the conditions of this overlay shall apply Boundary. The State Department of Fish and Game has identified an area within District 8B as containing .8 acres of existing wetland and 1.4 acres of restorable wetland. The 2.2 acre area is immediately adjacent to Beach Boulevard (see Figure 4.14). Regulations. Development shall be permitted only pursuant to an overall development plan for the entire overlay area and subject to the following: as a condition of any development on this parcel, topographic, vegetation, and soils information identifying the extent of any existing wetlands shall be submitted to the Director. The information shall be prepared by a qualified professional, and shall be subject to review by the California Department of Fish and Game. If any wetland is determined by the Department of Fish and Game to be severely degraded pursuant to Sections 30233 and 30411 of the California Coastal Act, or if it is less than one (1) acre in size, other restoration options may be undertaken, pursuant to the Coastal Commission's "Statewide Interpretive Guidelines for Wetlands and other Wet Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas." Conservation easements, dedications or other similar mechanisms shall be required over all wetland areas as a condition of development, to assure permanent protection. Public vehicular traffic shall be prohibited in wetland areas governed by a conservation easement. Specific drainage and erosion control requirements shall be incorporated into the project design to ensure that wetland areas are not adversely affected. No further subdivision of any parcel shall be permitted which would have the effect of dividing off environmentally sensitive habitat from other portions of such parcels for which urban uses are permitted in the City's Coastal Element until such time as the permanent protection of any wetland is assured. Within areas identified as wetlands in the coastal zone, the uses of the Coastal Conservation District shall supercede the uses of the FP1 and FP2 district. • Downtown Specific Plan -65- (1913D) CONSERVATION OVERLAY MAP Figure 4.15 Downtown Specific Plan -66- (1913D) i 4.16 MOBILEHOME DISTRICT Purpose. The Downtown Specific Plan includes approximately 24 acres with a Mobilehome District (MH) designation. The purpose of the Mobilehome District is to permit present mobilehome park uses to continue. These mobilehome areas fall within Districts Seven, Eight and Nine of the Downtown Specific Plan. Boundaries. The Mobilehome District encompasses parts of Districts 7, 8 and 9. The following describes the real property in two sections. Section One is approximately 6.2 acres in size located on the north side of Pacific Coast Highway between Huntington and Lake Streets. That portion of fractional Section 14, Township 6 South, Range 11 West in the Rancho Las Bolsas, City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, page 14 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Lake Street (formerly First Street) being parallel with and 37.50 feet southeasterly measured 147 feet right angles from the northwesterly line of Block 101 with the north right—of—way line of Pacific Coast Highway (formerly Ocean Avenue), also being the southeasterly extension of the southwesterly line of Block No. 101, all as shown on a map of Huntington Beach, recorded in Book 3, page 36 of Mescellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county; thence south 41'38'18" west 53.00 feet along the centerline of Lake Street to the construction centerline of Pacific Coast Highway; thence along said construction centerline the following, south 4838'18" west 53.00 feet along the centerline of Lake Street to the construction centerline of Pacific Coast Highway; thence along said construction centerline the following, south 48'21'42" east 98.26 feet to a curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 1200 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 4'55'28" an arc distance of 103.14 feet; thence south 53°17'11" east 108.26 feet to a curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 3328.60 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 1'20'17" an arc distance of 77.72 feet; thence south 54'37'28" east 400.00 feet; thence leaving said construction centerline north 35'22'32" east 52.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence south 54'37'28" east 427.26 feet; thence south 59'15'30" east 263.04 feet to the southwesterly extension of the westerly line of Huntington Street; thence 37'54'51" east 290.61 feet along said extension and said westerly line; thence north 54'05'09" west 0 Downtown Specific Plan —67— (1913D) Figure 4.16 Downtown Specific Plan -68- (1913D) I 520.00 feet; thence south 5054'51" west 120 feet; thence south 57032'32" west 55.85 feet; thence north 57005'09" west 70.00 feet; thence north 12005'09" west 120.00 feet; thence north 35°54'51" east 130.00 feet; thence north 54°05'09" west 170.00 feet; thence south 35°54'51" west 80.00 feet; thence north 89°05'09" west 70.00 feet; thence south 00*54151" west 170.00 feet; thence south 80°05'09" east 83.83 feet; thence south 35'22'32" west 157.67 feet to the true point of beginning. Section Two is approximately 18 acres in size located on the west side of Beach Boulevard north of Pacific Coast Highway. Beginning at the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 14; thence south 89°43'00" west 111.91 feet along the north line of the south half of the northeast quarter of said section to the true point of beginning; thence south 3°29'43" west 593.12 feet; thence south 25*32'14" west 386.94 feet; thence south 11044'36" east 771.48 feet; thence south 80°00'00" west 82.75 feet; thence north 52000'00" west 835.00 feet; thence north 38*00'00" east 300.00 feet; thence north 50°08'13" west 173.58 feet; thence north 45`00'00" east 84.85 feet to point "A" (to be used as a reference for the exception portion of this description); thence north 43°17'55" west 714.49 feet; thence due west 40.00 feet; thence south 49°45'49" west 170.29 feet; thence north 74028'33" west 186.82 feet; thence north 51045'58" west 420.51 feet; thence north 0°17'36" east 59.76 feet to the north line of the south half of the northeast quarter of said section; thence north 89°43'00" east 1,844.00 feet along said north line to the true point of beginning. Excepting therefrom the following: beginning at said Point "A", thence north 45°00'00" east 190.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north 43°17'55" west 550.00 feet; thence (north 89°43'00" east 640.00 feet; thence south 3'29'43" west 254.03 feet; thence south 25°32114" west 303.23 feet; thence north 43017'55" west 170.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Regulations. The regulations of the Downtown Specific Plan will serve as overlays for those portions of Districts Seven, Eight and Nine which retain the (MH) zone, until such time that the Mobilehome District designation is removed. All areas retaining the (MH) zone shall be subject to the provisions of the Mobilehome District of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. In addition, these areas are subject to the provisions of the Mobilehome Overlay Zones/Removal/Rezoning/Change of Use Article of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Downtown Specific Plan -69- (1913D) • Downtown Huntington Beach PARKING MASTER PLAN • Planning Commission Approved July 7, 1993 DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN Table of Contents Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 History. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 The Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ParkingSupply. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Parking Utilization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Parking Demand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Attachments : 1. Existing and Proposed Land Use Analysis 2 . Parking Structure Utilization Survey 3 . Downtown On-Street Parking Survey 4 . Downtown Parking Analysis DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN INTRODUCTION Historically, in the City of Huntington Beach, parking has been the number one issue of concern when considering any proposed change. That concern has transformed into the driving consideration for approving or denying development projects in the Downtown area. The provision of adequate parking is vital to the successful operation of any commercial area. Residents, business owners, visitors, developers and planners each have different definitions of the word adequate when it pertains to parking. Parking strategies for the Downtown Huntington Beach area are complicated further by the proximity of the beach and the different types of parking needs for the various beach uses . Over the years, Huntington Beach has had a number of parking strategies prepared. These studies have identified various procedures to satisfy the parking needs of different types of users . Over time, it has been necessary to modify the recommendations to accommodate the ever changing desires of the City' s redevelopment efforts . Despite these changes the basic principals still hold true. Parking spaces for Downtown shoppers should be provided in convienent locations within or immediately adjacent to the Downtown area, and should be in both on-street and off-street locations (including parking lots and structures) . Presently, public parking opportunities exist in the Downtown area. A public parking structure has been constructed and on-site subterranean parking facilities have been provided in private development projects . This, coupled with a restriping of the public streets to accommodate diagonal parking, has provided the downtown area with a current surplus of parking spaces . The purpose of this study is to assure that an adequate supply of parking is planned to accommodate the remainder of Downtown development and rehabilitation. Parking Master Plan -1- (1915D) i I .o 1 //�� V C � V �1S I ..1�� •�¢� � U M ( ) /� ``���jj(/y����v��,�,�(^Oy��l\t OO O �V,. /1.`• I� I ivr � le till '� 'f��f'{jI{'jjI■�Jf� (� L4 E: z \ �O`CY/V �\��O �y.I,-J �7JKI I f M• ��I �11 W"Ci 7J � O' ,OQ ,y�f�® O � � •�o V > - CL COEIDEOED -10 p�n o 00ogjllpQ O�o 0 oiL ao a000. ❑ s HISTORY . In 1985, the City (in conjunction with the firm of Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc. ) prepared a Parking Facilities Plan. The general concept for the plan was based on Downtown Huntington Beach becoming a major activity center in the region, providing a variety of shopping, dining and recreational opportunities to visitors, as well as, year round residents . The plan called for four (4) parking structures of 300 spaces each in remote corners of the Downtown. This scheme along with on-street and off-street parking was intended to accommodate approximately 500, 000 square feet of retail/restaurant/office activity including three (3) hotels. The parking demand projections for this plan were based on the assumption that parking facilities are more efficiently utilized when a group of different land uses share a parking facility. Therefore, a reduction factor of 20% of the City' s parking code requirement was recommended. This was justified by the mix of uses in the core area. However, due to the high cost of land assembly and construction cost associated with four (4) separate structures, this plan was not pursued. In 1986 a new Downtown Master Plan was prepared by 3D International and adopted by the City. This plan identified two (2) parking structures of 600 spaces each in the Downtown core area. One (1) in the second block and one (1) in the third block both within one-half (1/2) block of Main Street. These structures along with subterranean parking under both the Main-Pier Phase I and Main-Pier Phase II projects and expanded parking facilities along the ocean side of Pacific Coast Highway would be able to accommodate over 1, 000, 000 square feet of Downtown commercial activity. This plan was partially implemented with the construction of two (2) levels of parking (296 spaces) below the Main-Pier Phase I project (Pierside Pavilion) and with the construction of the first public parking structure in the second block of Main Street (815 spaces) . However, in an effort to pursue additional redevelopment projects and attempt to make each project more cost effective, the additional parking structure in the third block and the subterranean parking in the Main-Pier Phase II project were eliminated. The result of these actions and the desire to reduce land use intensities created the need to prepare the Downtown Village Concept and a new Downtown Parking Master Plan. Parking Master Plan -3- (1915D) LEGEND - PARKING MASTER PLAN AREA 1 A. Main Pier Two j B. Pierside Pavilion/Pier Colony C. Second Block Rehab. D. H.B. Promenade E. Third Block West F. Post Office Block 9 AREA 2 / 2� G. Town Square �F♦ H. Forth Block East I. Art Center Block ♦ s �F� I i P�P yG2rti ORANGE — AVE. 0 I I • sr pI OLIVE N A N Z Z - - r WALNUT AVE. IL �i _PALIF& C_QAUHW — — — — — Parking Master Plan _ 4 _ (MASTPUMR) THE PLAN The new Downtown Parking Master Plan is based on a shared parking concept . Shared parking in effect allows one (1) parking space to serve two (2) or more individual land uses without conflict . Shared parking relies on the variations in the peak parking demand for different uses . In other words parking demands will fluctuate in relationship to the mix of uses by hour, day of week and season. The proper mix will create an interrelationship among different uses and activities which result in a reduction of the demand for parking. Therefore, an overall reduction to the City' s required parking should be permitted. The effectiveness of a shared parking plan is dependent upon the control of many variables . Of prime concern is the location and availability of parking facilities . The location of parking in relation to Downtown commercial areas is constrained by the availability of land, its high cost (either in - dollars or in lost opportunities) and the distance which people are willing to walk from centralized lots or structures to reach their destination. Studies have shown that in order to receive optimum utilization by shoppers, a parking facility should be within 300 to 500 feet of the commercial use which it serves . For workers, or other people who are parking for the whole day, the distance can be as great as 1, 500 feet. These constraints must be considered when evaluating possible locations for parking facilities . The Downtown core area is centered along the Main Street commercial corridor . The Downtown Master Plan encourages a concentration of commercial activity along Main Street and, thus producing the greatest parking demand. Parking Master Plan -5- (1915D) DOWNTOWN LAND USE MASTER PLAN Block Restaurant Retail Office Miscellaneous AREA I (square feet) (square feet) (sQuare feet) (square feet) A 22,798 30,953 40,299 B 31,773 27,834 16,000 30,000 C 29,785 37,365 22,175 (1,750 D 5,000 24,073 3,000 seat theatre) E ------- 19,000 8,000 F 4,000 24,200 13,000 Sub Total 93,35611[ 162,425 111E 1022474 AREA 2 G ------- 25,000 4,700 10,575 H ------- 20,000 ------- (Art Ctr) I 7,946 2,500 ------- Sub total 7,946 47,500 4,700 Total 101,302 209,925 107,174 Master Plan 100,000 220,000 100,000 50,000 Parking Master Plan -6- (1915D) e In order to properly analyze the distinctively different parking needs, this commercial corridor divides into two (2) distinct areas north and south of Orange Avenue. Area 1 - The area south of Orange Avenue along Main Street provides the greatest amount of public parking opportunities both off-street and on-street . Area 1 will have the greatest number of visitor serving and seasonal commercial uses including year round entertainment . This area will also have the greatest concentration of expanded commercial, restaurant and office uses, and therefore, the majority of the public parking spaces should be provided in this area. Area 2 - The area north of Orange Avenue along Main Street provides limited amounts of public parking opportunities. This area is still part of the Downtown core. However, the commercial uses in Area 2 will cater more to the year round residents, therefore, additional on-street short term parking (20 minute) should be provided. This area will be a mixed use area with a significant amount of residential uses, therefore, the need for commercial and restaurant parking has been reduced. Another variable in providing an adequate supply of parking concerns the mix of anticipated activities and uses in the Downtown area. The success of this parking plan depends on controlling the types and amounts of retail, restaurant and office uses in the Downtown. The Downtown Master Plan anticipates a total development scenario of approximately 450, 000 to 500, 000 square feet of commercial activity. The final variable requires the implementation of regulations to the parking resources through parking rates, time limits and other methods which should be adjusted periodically to maintain the optimum use of all parking facilities . Parking Master Plan -7- (1915D) LEGEND A. Main Pier Two B. Pierside PaviIIONPier Colony ♦ C. Second Block Rehab. ` \ D. H.B. Promenade E. Third Block West F. Post Office Block G. Town Square H. Forth Block East Iy I. Art Center Block I s� I G I \ \ 1 ` P ORANGE AVE. ♦ Q' ti�,f♦ sue\ OLIVE yl IZI D o o N L0 I � N _ --- WMUT PACIFIC COAST HWY. - - - r - — - — - — - — - — - - - — - — - — - I - I I I - - -- Downtown Metered Parking Parking Master Plan - 8 - PARKVMPCZQ PARKING SUPPLY The first step in the preparation of the Downtown Parking Master Plan is to ' know the amount of public parking facilities currently available. An inventory of the existing Downtown on-street parking spaces was prepared by the City' s Traffic Engineering staff and a verification study was conducted by Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates (Attachment No. 3) . This study surveyed each block in the Downtown area and determined the on-street parking potential. The survey indicates approximately 778 total on street parking spaces are available in the Downtown area. The study reveals that nearly forty percent of these parking spaces are unmetered and the majority of them are only charging $.25 per hour. Although the survey identified 778 total parking spaces only half of those spaces are suitable for the commercial demands of the Downtown area. The remaining spaces are either in residential areas or are too great a distance from the commercial uses . DOWNTOWN ON STREET PARKING SUMMARY BLOCK Metered Free Total AREA 1 Third Street 21 27 48 Main Street 82 82 Fifth Street 116 116 Walnut Avenue 14 7 21 Olive Avenue 11 15 26 Orange Avenue 16 16 Sub Totals 244 65 309 AREA 2 Metered Free Total Main Street 39 9 48 Pecan Avenue 17 17 Frankfort Avenue 10 10 Acacia Avenue 18 18 Sub'Totals 39 54 93 Totals 283 119 402 Parking Master Plan -9- (1915D) LEGEND A. Main Pier Two B. Pierside Pavilion/Pier Colony C. Second Block Rehab. D. H.B. Promenade ♦ E. Third Block West F Post Office Block I G. Town Square .�i H. Forth Block East `�y I• Art Center Block I A ORANGE AVE. ♦ P 'yCf♦ OLIVE AVE. h n N I S Z Z -- - ------- ---- WALNUT AVE. -- -- ------------------- A Cn I PACIFIC COAST FI\WY. - - - - - I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I L _ — _ J >Y Off Street Parking Lots Parking Master Plan - 10- (OFFSTVICCDR) dls�rl'AbvfeD 7-0 �o�n C_c L In addition to the 402 on street public parking spaces, the Downtown area has 1, 111 existing parking spaces in structured facilities, 309 spaces in existing surface lots with an additional 164 plus spaces planned. On-site parking has always been a major component of large development projects . The combined studies indicate that the total parking supply available at maximum build out will be approximately 1, 984 spaces . There are 1, 714 parking spaces in Area 1 and 270 spaces in Area 2 . These spaces are a combination of on-street public, on-site public and on-site private spaces . Continued monitoring of the Downtown areas parking supply will be a necessary task as the uses change over time. Downtown On-Site Parking Summary AI?EA 1 EXISTING PROPOSED A 56 75 75 B 296 --- 296 C 6 --- 6 D 815 --- 815 E 132 --- 0 F 25 --- 25 Subtotal 11330 75 1,217 Block AREA 2 EXISTING PROPOSED EINAL G 17 --- 17 H 61 89 150 I 10 --- 10 Subtotal 88 89 177 Total 1,418 164 1,394 Total 1,582 Ultimate Total 1,394 On-Street 402 TOTAL DOWNTOWN PARKING - 1,984 ULTIMATE DOWNTOWN PARKING - 1.796 Parking Master Plan -11- (1915D) PARKING STRUCTURE UTILIZATION STUDY TIME 2-19-93 2-20-93 5-29-93 5-30-93 5-31-93 OF DAY No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % 10:00 am 36 4.4 43 5.3 150 18.4 131 16.1 114 14.0 12:00 pm 58 7.1 52 6.4 3:00 pm 84 10.3 165 20.2 418 51.3 413 50.7 428 52.5 6:00 pm 138 16.9 232 28.5 I 9 8:00 pm 425 52.1 370 45.4 278 34.1 12:00 am 367 45.0 272 33.4 70 8.6 Note: Total Public Parking Spaces 815 Source: Greer and Co. City of Huntingtin Beach Department of Community Services Parking Master Plan -12- (1915D) In addition to the 402 on street public parking spaces, the Downtown area has 1, 111 existing parking spaces in structured facilities , . 309 � spaces in existing surface lots with an additional 164 plus spaces planned. On-site parking has always been a major component of large development projects . The combined studies indicate that the total /pajv'king supply available at maximum build out will be approximatel , 984 spaces . There are 1, 714 parking spaces in Area 1 and 270 spaces in Area 2 . These spaces are a combination of on-street public, on-site public and on-site private spaces . Continued monitori,ng of the Downtown areas parking supply will be a necessary task/as the uses change over time. Downtown On-Site Parking Summary Block AREA 1 / EXISTING PROPOSED A ,I' 56 75 B , 296 --- C / 6 --- D / 815 --- E / 132 --- F / 25 --- Subtotal 1,330 75 Block AREA/2 EXISTING PROPOSED G/ 17 --- 61 89 I 10 --- ,Subtotal 88 89 Total 1,418 164 Grad Total 1,582 Off-Street 402 L TOTAL DOWNTOWN PARKING - 1,984 Parking Master Plan -11- (1915D) • PARKING STRUCTURE UTILIZATION STUDY TIME 2-19-93 2-20-93 5-29-93 5-30-93 5-31-93 OF DAY No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % 10:00 am 36 4.4 43 5.3 150 18.4 131 16.1 114 14.0 12:00 pm 58 7.1 52 6.4 3:00 pm 84 10.3 165 20.2 418 51.3 413 50.7 428 52.5 6:00 pm 138 16.9 232 28.5 ( 0 8:00 pm 425 52.1 370 45.4 278 34.1 12:00 am 367 45.0 272 33.4 70 8.6 Note: Total Public Parking Spaces 815 Source: Greer and Co. City of Huntingtin Beach Department of Community Services Parking Master Plan -12- (1915D) PARKING UTILIZATION In order to better determine the true effectiveness of a shared parking approach for Huntington Beach, Greer and Company prepared a Downtown Parking Analysis (see Attachment No. 4) . This study reviewed the inventory of existing public and private parking spaces and then surveyed the utilization of these spaces . The study also reviewed the existing and proposed land uses and the current and future parking demand. The study indicated that the on-street metered parking spaces are used nearly 100% of the time during peak business hours, while the subterranean parking facilities within the Main Pier I project are used less than 25% of the time. The study also showed strong activity in the use of the parking lots in the third block on Main Street (50%) , while the public parking structure usage for the same time period was only 20-30% of capacity. The study then concluded that the area had a great surplus of parking opportunities . During the time of this study the Downtown area was approximately 10% vacant. However, due to the time of year when the study was conducted, additional information was necessary. Therefore, the Downtown Parking Analysis survey information has been augmented with operational statistics of the Downtown Parking Structure for selective peak periods . The additional survey data was collected over Memorial Day weekend (May 29 - 31, 1993) . During this weekend, the City experienced good weather conditions, thereby increasing the parking demand. The survey revealed that on this busy weekend with numerous new businesses open, there were still nearly half of the spaces in the parking structure available for use at the peak demand times . Parking Master Plan -13- (1915D) LEGEND PARKING MASTER PLAN AREA !� �J A. Main Pier Two B. Pierside Pavilion/Pier Colony C. Second Block Rehab. D. H.B. Promenade E. Third Block West F. Post Office Block ?� AREA 2 G. Town Square H. Forth Block East dr Lpl��F I. Art Center Block - �F� I I P�P yGy�ti +-- ORANGE — — —AVE. I sly n I `SFr OLIVE N AVE. N j z z N ~ 1 M N WALNUT AVE. N — J L o A B . . P#4�IF& C,QA$.HW. Parking Master Plan -14- (F%W1PN.cDR) PARKING DEMAND The final analysis compares the intended mix of uses and the number of parking opportunities . The shared parking concept relies on three (3) assumptions which will result from the proper blend of uses and activities. 1. The first assumption recognizes that various uses have different peak parking demands . For example retail and restaurant uses have a peak parking period different from offices . In Huntington Beach many of the restaurant uses also have different peak times . Some restaurants cater to a morning and lunch customers while others are primarily open for dinner . Time differentials can also refer to seasonal activity which demands different attention. Huntington Beach has always experienced a greater demand of its parking resources in the summer months. 2 . The second assumption is based on the idea that people who work and live in an area also shop in that same area. This captive market of office workers and residents are likely to be many of the restaurant and retail customers . This is particularly true for the Downtown area, due to its rather isolated location from other commercial centers . 3 . The third assumption derives from observation that in an active commercial center patrons generally shop at numerous locations on a single auto trip. In order to realize this concept a variety of activities must be offered in the commercial center. The plan does not address residential parking in the shared parking concept. All required residential parking shall be provided on-site for each project. Parking Master Plan -15- (1915D) DOWNTOWN VACANCY RATES (February 1993) BLOCK SQUARE FOOTAGE % VACANT A 50, 500 21. 19 (10, 700 sf) B 75, 607 11. 08 (8, 375 sf) C 90, 925 0 D 32, 073 0 E 25, 163 26. 62 (8, 538 sf) F 27, 825 0 G 29 , 700 11. 11 (3 ,300 sf) H 32, 250 24 . 81 (8, 000 sf) I 21, 021 0 Total 385, 064 10 . 11 (38, 913 sf) Source: City of Huntington Beach Departments of Community Development and Economic Development Parking Master Plan -16- (1915D) As stated before, maximum buildout for the Downtown area will be between 450, 000 - 500, 000 square feet of commercial activities . Area one will contain approximately 350, 000 to 400, 000 square feet with the remaining 50, 000 to 100, 000 square feet of activity occurring in Area 2. The traditional code required parking for this intensity and mix of commercial activities would indicate a need for approximately 2, 700 parking spaces in Area 1. This would require 1, 000 additional parking spaces over the current and anticipated supply. Although this is a 40% reduction, the mix of activities is ideal for the shared parking approach. A comparable reduction of 33% is also identified for Area 2 (code required parking is approximately 300 spaces with a supply of approximately 200 spaces) . Therefore, the Downtown Parking Master Plan proposes an overall reduction of the code required number of parking spaces based on these assumptions along with a proposed maximum buildout of commercial activities . Parking Master Plan -17- (1915D) DOWNTOWN PARKING REQUIREMENTS Block ode Required Parking with (Reduction Factor) Area 1 Restraurant Retail Office Misc. Total Adjusted (25%) (25%) (80%) (') Total A 230 (58) 155 (39) 160 (128) 545 (225) 320 B 320 (80) 140 (35) 64 (51) 583 (233) 1107 (399) 708 C 300 (75) 185 (46) 88 (70) 573 (191) 382 D 50 (13) 120 (30) 12 (11) 182 (54) 128 E - 95 (24) 32 (26) 127 (50) 77 F 40 (10) 120 (30) 52 (42) 212 (82) 130 Sub Total 940 (236) 815 (204) 480 (328) 583 (233) 2746(1001) 1745 Area 2 (0%) (50%) (50%) Total G - 125 (63) 19 (10) 144 (73) 71 H - 100 (50) 100 (50) 50 1 80 (0) 13 (7) 93 ( 7) 86 Sub Total 80 (0) 238 (120) 19 (10) 337 (130) 207 Total 1020 (236) 1053 (324) 427 (338) 583 (233) 3033(1131) 1902 (') Reduction; 1 space for every 5 seats i Parking Master Plan -18- (1915D) RECOMMENDATIONS In order to determine the appropriate amount of parking which should be available, an adjusted parking demand was calculated using the previously stated assumption. This adjusted parking requirement was calculated for both Area 1 and Area 2 . The location and type of parking resources available in the Downtown area recognizes that two different and distinct implementation approaches are necessary for each of the areas . Area 1 - In Area 1 the restaurant and retail parking requirement was reduced by twenty-five percent and the office requirement by eighty percent. In addition the theatre parking requirement was reduced from the existing code requirement of one parking space for every third seat to one parking space for every fifth seat. This reduction is based on surveys conducted by the theatre industry. These reductions recognize the time differential and captive market concepts . Expanding commercial activity in this area remains the focus of the Downtown Master Plan, however, no additional parking' for new or expanded commercial, restaurant and office uses should be required. The majority of public parking opportunities currently exist in this area and the current parking supply exceeds the parking demand. This parking supply will continue to be adequate provided the total square footage of uses do not exceed the Master Plan projections . As a means of assuring an adequate future supply of public parking spaces, a site should be identified and preserved for a potential parking structure. This area should be within the Main Pier II project area. Parking Master Plan -19- (1915D) Area - In Area 2 the retail and office requirement was reduced by fifty percent. This recognizes that the retail activity will be primarily convenience commercial catering to local residents on short term shopping trips . The office parking requirement reduction is based on the minimal number of office opportunities and the apparent demand that any new office uses will need to provide on-site parking. Restaurant uses were not given a reduction factor. Numerous conflicts are created between restaurant and residential uses, therefore, restaurants should be required to provide one hundred percent of their parking requirement on-site. The existing Downtown public parking facilities are not conveniently located for use in this area, thus, a combination of expanded on-street and on-site parking may be necessary for new or expanded commercial uses . However, providing the commercial activity remains primarily service related commercial, the existing supply of on-street and on-site parking should be sufficient for anticipated uses . All future development projects must be carefully reviewed for parking concerns . The mix of commercial and residential activities can justify a parking reduction and additional parking may not be necessary. To further assure parking availability all parking spaces should be limited term (20 minutes maximum) . Also a site should be identified and preserved for a potential surface parking area. This location should be near the intersection of 6th and Lake Streets . Parking Master Plan -20- (1915D) ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS In order to assure the most efficient and effective use of the City' s parking facilities, the following recommendations should be implemented: City Initiated: Immediate Implementation: 1. Increase the parking meter fee from $.25 per hour to $1. 00 per hour for all downtown meters with a two (2) hour maximum stay. 2 . Maximize the amount of on-street parking spaces to diagonal and reduce the number of parallel spaces . 3 . Prior to the Downtown Parking Master Plan becoming operational, the Redevelopment Agency/City must identify and acquire two (2) sites, one (1) in Area 1 and one (1) in Area 2 for future parking opportunities . 4 . Designate two (2) additional parking facility locations: a. Include an option for an additional parking structure in the Main-Pier Phase II project area, Block 104 . b. Include a surface parking facility at the north end, between Sixth Street and Pecan Avenue, adjacent to Lake Street . 5 . Eliminate all free public parking locations in the downtown. 6 . Improve the signage for parking facilities. Short Term (within 1 year) : 1. Require residential parking passes for the non-commercial districts in the downtown area. 2 . Require the mandatory purchase of annual parking passes for all employees at the time of business license renewal . 3 . Require designated employee parking areas in the remote portions of all parking facilities . 4 . Conduct annual parking analysis to forecast when actual number of spaces. available requires new parking resources. 5 . Investigate use of shared beach parking to accommodate after 6 : 00 p.m. peak hour uses, e.g. restaurant, theaters, and/or employee. Parking Master Plan -21- (1915D) Based on Entitlements : 1. Require on-site parking for all projects one-half (1/2) block or greater in size. 2 . Require that any parking in-lieu fees be full cost recovery based on the parking requirement for specific uses . However, allow that these fees be paid over an amortization period. 3 . Require valet parking once the maximum buildout of restaurant activity has been obtained. 4 . Commercial projects greater than 10, 000 square feet in size shall be required to submit a parking management plan consistent with the Downtown Parking Master Plan. 5 . Require valet and/or remote parking for special events and activities. Parking Master Plan -22- (1915D) CONCLUSION The provision of adequate parking is vital to the successful operation of any commercial area. Therefore, many controls will be necessary and rates adjusted to maintain an adequate supply of conveniently located public parking. The required parking by City codes does not take into consideration the public use patterns of the Downtown area. Establishing the overall parking demand for the Downtown simply by adding the peak parking requirements for individual land uses produces an estimate that is unrealistically high. The true parking demand needs to be determined for mixed use project. The mixed use project identified for Downtown Huntington Beach in the Master Plan can be accomplished with limited additional public parking facilities and proper land use and operational controls . ATTACHMENTS . 1. Existing and Proposed Land Use Analysis 2 . Parking Structure Utilization Survey 3 . Downtown On-Street Parking Survey 4 . Downtown Parking Analysis I Parking Master Plan -23- (1915D) EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE ANALYSIS Prepared by the Department of Community Development MAY 1993 ATTACHMENT NO. = LEGEND A. Main Pier Two \\� B. Pierside Pavillion/Pier Colony C. Sccond Block Rehab. D. H.B. Promenade E. Third Block West F. Post Office Block / G. Town SgUare H. North Main Street Block I. Art Center Block �O I 1 si JC• s� H G sl Orange Ave. 1 fn N N E In t N Olive Ave. S� 1 PP. C D walnut Ave. 1 A B I � ' 1 �o ry Pnclflc Coast Highway t I 1 ATTACHMENT NO. t>o Bloc Existing and Pr ed Development_ * *. n PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT r ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME '' RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 101 Main Retail 2,500 0 Abdelmuti Project 13,953 2,798 30,299 75 Residential 0 3 du) 109 Main Retail 2,500 0 111 Main Retail 2,500 0 113 Main Retail 2,500 0 115 Main Retail 2,500 0 Office 2,500 406 PCH Restaurant 2,200 0 410 PCH Retail 4,000 10 (A-1) 117 Main Restaurant 2,500 0 Coultrup Project 12,000 20,000 10,000 N/A Office 2,500 119 Main Retail 2,500 0 (Block 104) 121 Main Retail 2,500 0 123 Main Retail 1,500 2 416 PCH Retail 3,000 12 Residential (4 du) 122 5th Auto Sales 12,000 12 (A-2) 151 5th Theatre 5,500 50 Coultrup Project n/a n/a n/a Residential (80 du) 501 Walnut Office 1,500 0 (Block 105) 505 Walnut Residential 1,200 0 0 du) 504 PCH Retail 1,250 0 508 PCH Restaurant 1,250 8 Residential 2 0 du) >' 520 PCH Retail 1,500 16 (A-3) C) Residential :1•• 0 du) ' 127 Main Retail 3,500 6 Lane(rerry(A-4) 5,000 n/a 513 Walnut Retail 2,500 0 orthy Project (A-5) Bed Breakfast(12 du) 12 —� Residential (12 du) �) 519 Walnut Retail 800 0 128 6th Residential (1du) TOTAL: 30,9531 22,7981 40,2991 87 Block B Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT ; PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME. RETAIL RESTAURANT. OFFICE OTHER PARKING 112 Mein Retail 2,500 Pierside Pavilion 14,459 23,773 16,000 Theatre (1750 seats) 296 114 Main Retail 2,500 Residential (4 du) 306 PCH Nite Club 5,500 25 302 PCH Auto Repair 8,250 115 3rd Auto Repair 4,500 12 301 Walnut Office 2,400 311 Walnut Office 2,000 317 Walnut Retail 1,000 (B-1) Residential 0 du) 102 PCH 85 Pier Colony Residential (130 du) 112 3rd 24 118 3rd Res. (2 du) 120 3rd Res. 0 du) 122 3rd Res. (4 du) 124 3rd Res. 0 du) 217 Walnut Res. 0 du) 215 Walnut Res. (1 du) 213 Walnut Res. 0 du) 127 2nd Res. 0 du) (8-2) 126 Main Retail/Res. (6 5,875 Standard Market (B- 5,875 3,000 du) 3) 116 Mein Retail 2,500 2,500 118 Main Retail 2,500 2,500 120 Main Retail 2,875 2,500 122 Main Retail 1,250 2,500 124 Main Retail 2,125 2,500 TOTAL: 27,834 31,773 16,000 296 0 Ri z 0 i 01 . 11 Bloc Existing and Pr ed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT ROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 201 Main Restaurant 2,125 4,500 5,000 203 Main Retail 2,875 205 Main Retail 1,650 1,650 207 Main Retail 4,900 4,900 209 Main Restaurant 2,000 2,000 211 Main Retail 2,625 2,625 675 213 Main Retail 540 540 213 1/2 Main Restaurant 585 585 Patio 1,000 215 Main Restaurant 1,750 1,750 1,800 Res. (6 du) Patio 750 217 Main MTG Room 1,000 1,000 Patio 1,500 221 Main Retail 2,500 6 4,250 9,100 4,200 223 Main Retail 1,750 Residential (4 du) 411 Olive Retail 2,000 6 4,400 2,400 412 Walnut Restaurant 1,800 3,600 Office 1,800 202 5th Res. (6 du) 1,600 Police 1,600 206 5th Res. (1 du) 208 5th Restaurant 4,000 2 1,000 3,000 Res. (2 du) Patio 500 214 5 th Auto Repair 5,000 5,000 3,000 218 5th Office 1,000 2 2,500 2,500 220 5th Office 1,000 2 2,500 2,500 a 222 5th Retail/Res. 3,500 4 3,500 3,500 (2 du) TOTAL: 37,3651 29,785 22,175 1,600 1 x" I •�v 1 1V • Bldck D Existing and Proposed Development PRE'-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 202 Main Retail 5875 Main Promenade 24,073 5,000 3,000 815 1750 208 Mein Office 5,500 210 Mein Retail 2,750 212 Main Retail/Res. 2,750 (6 du) 214 Main Retail/Res. 2,750 (6 du) 218 Main Retail 5,875 220 Main Retail 1,250 10 222 Main Office 1,500 224 Main Retail 2,938 226 Mein Retail 2,938 228 Main Retail/Res. 2,938 6 (6 du) 209 3RD n/a 40 211 3RD Res. (6 du) 218 3RD n/a 30 221 3RD Res. (1 du) 223 3RD Res. (2 du) 225 3RD n/a 24 321 Walnut Office 1,000 TOTAL: 24,073 F),0001 3,0001 1815 -ter t Blo'c4ft Existing and PryWed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT MFPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ' ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 303 Main Retail 500 12 Third Block West 19,000 8,000 Residential (68 du) 134(comm) 305 Main Retail/Res. 1,750 4 (8 du) 307 Mein Retail/Res. 1,750 4 (8 du) 309 Main Retail 2,938 8 311 Main Retail 1,600 20 325 Main n/a 40 302 STH Retail 5,500 20 Office 5,500 310 STH Retail/Res. 2,125 (2 du) 314 STH Office 3,500 328 5TH Res. 0 du) 320 5TH We 25 TOTAL:1 19,0001 01 8,000 134 D c-. Block .F Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 316 Olive Post Office 3,575 5,000 Post Office 3575 316 Main (F-1) 318 Mein Retail 1,250 6 6,000 4,000 8,000 320 Main Retail 1,250 6 322 Main Office 1,000 6 324 Main Office 1,000 2 326 Mein Office 2,250 6 328 Mein Retail 4,250 (F-2) 303 3rd Auto Repair 8,250 (F-3) 13,200 315 3rd Office 2,500 24 2,500 305 Orange Office 2,500 6 2,500 TOTAL: 24,200 4,000 13,000 l_7 • a r � i B16cLd& Existing and Praftsed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT 'qOROPOSED DEVELOPMENT' ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 420 Sth Retail 2,500 Town Square 10,000 Residential (89 du) 15 (comm.) 416 Orange Res. (1 du) 408 5th Res. (1 du) 410 Sth Res. 0 du) 412 5th Office 1,000 416 5th Res. (1 du) (G-1) 401 Mein Retail 7,700 7,700 405 Main Retail n/a 17 4,000 411 Main Retail 3,300 3,300 417 Main Office 2,500 2,500 419 Main loffice 1 2,2001 11 1 2,200 TOTAL: 25,0001 4,7001 15 f, -r � y 'r Black H Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ..ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER . PARKING 410 Mein Retail 6,900 24 Fourth Block East 20,000 Residential (100 du) 150 424 Main Retail 8,500 428 Main Retail 5,500 438 Main Retail 2,550 440 Main Retail 2,500 504 Mein Retail (4 du) 6,300 401 Lake Res. (1 du) 405 Lake Res.(1 du) 407 Lake Res. (1 du) 409 Lake Res. (1 du) 421 Lake Res. (3 du) 427 Lake Res. (1 du) 431 Lake Res. (4 du) 435 Lake Res. (4 du) 437 Lake Res. 0 du) 443 Lake Res. 0 du) 505 Lake Res. (1 du) 201 Pecan Res. 0 du) 205 Pecan Res. (1 du) 209 Pecan lRes. 0 du) 150 TOTAL: 20,000 . J r' v . 1 ( J It Bloc Existing and Pr Wed Development Am 'PRE-DEVELOPMENT ROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ' ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE 'OTHER PARKING 520 Main Restaurant 5,280 5,280 522 Main Restaurant 2,666 2,666 526 Main Retail/Res. 2,500 2,500 (3 du) 538 Main Office 10,575 10 Art Center 10,575 10 TOTAL1- 2,500 7,946 10,5751 10 Ji -r• I �r CITY OFHUNTINGTON BEACH TO : Jim Engle Community Services Department FROM : Steve Benson ,/J- DATE June 1 , 1993 SUBJECT MAIN PROMENADE MEMORANDUM PARKING STRUCTURE The following shows the number of autos parked at the Main Promenade during the past twelve months. This number includes all paid autos, validations, pass holders, vendors and miscellaneous vehicles. # AUTOS 1993 - May . . . . . . . . 29,812 April . . . . . . 27,887 March . . . . . . 28,236 February . . . 22, 188 January . . . . 21 ,470 1992 - December . . . 18,286 November . . . 21 ,646 October . . . . 20,238 ` O)v 01 40o September . . 21 ,284 Cj1 c�p IS9'3 August . . . . . 28,544 July . . . . . . . 25,597 June . . . . . . . 17,673 TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . .282,861 Memorial weekend - May 29, 30 & 31 , 1993 10 A.M. 3 P.M. 8 P.M. MIDNIGHT May 29 . . . . . . 150 418 425 367 30 . . . . . . 131 413 370 272 31 . . . . . . 114 428 278 70 TOTAL . . . . . . . 395 1 ,259 1 ,073 709 = 3,436 SB/P ATTACHMENT NO. 2 � CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DOWNTOWN ON-STREET PARKING SURVEY SUMMARY • JUNE 81 1992 . DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ATTACHMENT N0.3a- Jf ` CITY OF HUNTINGTOIN BEACH ` ,. INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION NUn'TINCION BEACH TO: Robert E. Eichblatt, P.E., City Engineer It FROM: James D. Otterson, P.E., P.L.S., Traffic Engine DATE: June 8, 1992 SUBJECT: Maximum Potential Parking Spaces in the Downtown Specific Plan Area INTRODUCTION An inventory of the existing downtown on-street parking spaces was conducted by the Traffic Engineering staff early this year. The result of that effort has now been finalized with the assistance of Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates (RBF). RBF has conducted extensive field verification of on-street parking. RBF has submitted a report on the findings with substantial evidence (i.e. AutoCad drawings for each downtown block) in support of the findings. A summary of the findings is presented herein. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The Downtown parking survey covered an area bounded by Pacific Coast Highway on the south, First Street on the east, Sixth Street on the west, and Acacia Avenue on the north. The parking survey in May of 1992 found that there were 465 "defined" on-street parking spaces. "Defined" means that the parking space is either metered or marked on the pavement, for the purpose of this report. These "defined" parking spaces included 441 metered parking spaces and 24 marked but not metered parking spaces. In addition, there were a total of 7,395 linear feet of curb space "undefined" for on-street parking (i.e. parking space is neither metered nor marked on the pavement). These 7,395 linear feet of curb space can be marked on the pavement (or metered) for 313 on-street parking spaces. The total number of possible on- street parking spaces in the study area is 778 spaces. The attached table (8 pages) presents an inventory of the on-street park- ing spaces by "block face" (i.e. one side of street between two cross streets). These "block face" counts can be aggregated to show the parking supply for each downtown block to enable a comparison of the supply with the forecasted ATTACHMENT NO. demand which is usually expressed on a block by block basis, or in any other manner as may be desired. FUTURE CONDITIONS The existing conditions may change in the future. For instance, since Walnut Avenue between First and Sixth Streets is classified as an Arterial Street curb parking on Walnut Avenue may be prohibited in the future. 46 existing plus 22 potential on-street parking spaces will be affected. The number of possible parking spaces in the study area will be reduced from 778 to 710 (i.e. 778 - 68 = 710) spaces. Additionally, potential future land developments in the downtown area may necessitate new curb cuts (and red curbs adjacent to the curb cuts) which will also reduce the existing curb space for parking. PARKING METERS The marking of parking spaces on the pavement and/or the installation of parking meters will help to define the parking spaces and increase the existing utilization of curb space for parking. If parking meters are preferred over marking (i.e. painting) parking stalls, it is recommended that no parking meters be installed on any street north of Orange Avenue. Attachment: Parking Inventory (Table showing parking spaces by street and side of street). c.c. Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator A sF. Sandoval, Director of Public Works rbara Kaiser, Director, Economic Development Mike Adams, Director of Community Development Department Ron Hagan, Director of Community Services Department 2 ATTACHMENT N0.,3� HUNTINGTON BEACH DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Page I of 8 VEHICULAR PARKING STUDY Jul) Number: 28709 Datc: 6/219*2 EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING METERED/ MARKED .UNMARKED PROPOSED STREET FROM TO MAR KEp (UNMETERED) PARKING PARKING PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES ;(FT) SPACES FIRST STREET Pacific Coast Highway Walnut Avennc \Vest side of street 0 0 0 0 Gust side of street 0 0 0 0 FIRST STREET Wnh►ut Avenue Olive Avcnuc West side of street 13 0 0 17 East side of street 19 0 0 20 FIRST STREET Olive Avenue Orange Avenue/ West side of street Allanta Avenue 0 0 0 0 Enst side of street 0 0 0 0 FIRST STREET SUBTOTAL 32 0 0 37 SECOND STREET Pacific Coast Highway Walnut Avenue West side of street 9 0 0 9 Enst side of street 9 0 0 9 > SECOND STREET Walnut Avcnuc Olive Aveauc Wcst side of street 13 0 0 13 D East side of street 12 0 0 12 SECOND STREET Olive Avenue Orange Avenue m West side of street 12 0 0 12 Z East side of street 12 0 0 12 z SECOND STREET SUBTOTAL 67 0 0 67 0 EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING . METERED/ MARKED UNMARKED PROPOSED S'I'Itl'sll• FROM I'O MARKI'sl) (tINMI:I'I:Itlil)) PARKING I'AItKIN(: PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES (1=I') SPACES THIRD STREET Walnul Avenue Olive Avenue West side of street I I 0 0 11 East side of street 10 0 0 10 THIRD STREET Olive Avenue Orange Avenue West side of street 0 0 231 11 East side of*street 0 0 330 IG LAKE STREET Orange Avenue Pecan Avenue West side of street 0 0 526 24 East side of street 0 0 363 16 LAKE STREET Pecan Avenue Frankfort Avenue West side of street 0 0 107 5 East side of street 0 0 155 7 LAKE STREET Frankfort Avenue Acacia Avenue West side of street 0 0 54 3 East side of street 0 0 112 5 THIRD STREET/LAKE STREET SUBTOTAL 21 01 1,878 108 n m z z 0 Page 3 or 8 'EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING METERED/ MARKED UNMARKED PROPOSED STREET FROM Tp MARKED (UNMETERED) PARKING PARKING PARKING SPACES BARKING SPACES (FT) SPACES MAIN STREET Pacific Coast Highway Walnut Avenue West side of street 10 0 0 10 East side of street 14 0 0 14 MAIN STREET Walnut Avenue Olive Avenue West side of street 8 0 0 8 East side of street 16 0 0 16 MAIN STREET Olive Avenue Orange Avenue West side of street 18 0 0 18 East side of street 16 0 0 16 MAIN STREET West side of street Orange Avenue Frankfort Avenue 24 0 0 24 East side of street Ormige Avenue Pecan Avenue 15 0 0 15 MAIN STREET West side ol'streel East side of street Pecan Avcnuc Frankfort Avenue 0 2 0 2 MAIN STREET West side of street Frankfort Avenue Acacia Avenue 0 3 0 3 East side of street Frankfort Avenue Acacia Avenue 0 4 0 4 MAIN STREET SUBTOTAL 121 9 0 130 n m z i z 0 Page 4 of 8 EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING METERED! MARKED UNMARKED PROPOSED STREET FROM TO MARKED (UNMET•ERED) PARKING PARKING PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES (FT) SPACES FIFTII STREET Pacific Coast Ilighway Walnut Avenue West side of street - 18 0 0 18 East side of street 20 0 0 20 3Yi FIFTH STREET Walnut Avenue Olive Avcnuc West side of street 20 0 0 20 East side of street 19 0 0 19 FIFTH STREET Olive Avenue Orange Avenue West side of street 22 0 0 22 t 6 East side of street 17 0 0 17 FIFTH STREET SUBTOTAL 116 0 0 116 SIXTH STREET Pacific Coast highway Wahwt Avcnuc West side of street 0 0 173 7 East side of street 0 0 146 6 SIXTH STREET Walnut Avenue Olive Avcnuc West side of street 0 0 272 11 East side of street 0 0 282 13 SIXTH STREET Olive Avenue Orange Avcnuc West side of street 0 0 287 13 Enst side of street 0 0 272 11 n SIXTH STREET Orange Avenue Main Street West side of street 0 0 556 25 East side of street 0 0 443 18 m SIXTH STREET SUBTOTAL 0 0 2,431 104 Z 0 Page 5 of 8 EXISTING EXISTING 'EXISTING METF-RLD/ MARKED "UNMARKED PROPOSED STREET FROM TO MARKED (UNMF-TEI1~D) PARKING PARKING PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES (FT) SPACES WALNUT AVENUE Sixth Street Fifth Street North side of street 0 0 188 7 South side of street 0 0 204 9 WALNUT AVENUE Fifth Street Main Street North side of street 5 0 39 5 South side of street 5 0 45 7 WALNUT AVENUE Main Street Third Street North side of street 4 2 0 6 South side.of sheet 0 0 97 3 WALNUT AVENUE Third Street Second Street North side of street 6 0 0 6 South side of street 7 0 0 8 WALNUT AVENUE Second Street Ist Street North side of street 7 0 0 7 South side of street 10 0 0 10 WALNUT AVENUE SUBTOTAL 44 2 573 68 A C7 m z z O Page 6 of 8 EXISTING LXISTING EXISTING METERED/ MARKED UNMARKED PROPOSED STREET FROM TO MARKED (UNMETERL•D) PARKING PARKING PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES (1='1') SPACES OLIVE AVENUE Sixth Street Fifth Stre;1 North side of street 0 0 186 7 South side of street 0 0 157 5 OLIVE AVENUE Fifth Street Main Street North side of street 2 4 0 6 South side of street 4 0 85 7 OLIVE AVENUE Main Street Third Street North side of street 2 3 35 5 South side of street 3 4 0 8 OLIVE AVENUR Third Slrect Sccrnxl Slrcrt Nurth side ul'street 9 0 0 9 South side of street 9 0 0 9 OLIVE AVENUE Second Street Ist Street North side of street 6 0 0 5 South side of street 5 2 0 7 OLIVE AVENUE SUBTOTAL 40 13 463 68 n m z --i z 0 Page 7 of 8 .:EXISTING EXISTING .EXISTING METERED/ MARKED UNMARKED PROPOSED STREET FROM TO ?4AP-KED (UN m8T:ERED) PARKING PARKING PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES (FT) SPACES ORANGE AVENUE Sixth Street Fifth Street North side of street 0 0 231 10 South side of strcct 0 0 72 3 ORANGE AVENUE Fifth Street Main Street North side of street 0 0 98 4 South side of street 0 0 0 0 ORANGE AVENUE Main Street Third Street North side of street 0 0 154 S South side of street 0 0 173 7 ORANGE AVENUE Third Street Second Street North side of street 0 0 0 0 South side of street 0 0 155 6 ORANGE AVENUE Sccond Street Ist Street North side of street 0 0 0 0 South side of street 0 0 0 0 PECAN AVENUE Main Street Lake Street North side of street 0 0 236 9 D South side of street 0 0 221 8 DPECAN AVENUE SUBTOTAL 0 0 457 17 = FRANKFORT AVEN Main Street Lake Street North side of street 0 0 106 4 South side of street 0 0 134 6 m � FRANKFORT AVENUE SUBTOTAL 0 01 240 J 10 Z O i Page 8 of 8 EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING METERED/ MARKED UNMARKED PROPOSED STREET FROM TO MARKED (UNMETERED) PARKING PARKING PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES (FT) SPACES ACACIA AVENUE Main Street Lake Street North side of street 0 0 240 10 South side of street 0 0 230 8 ACACIA AVENUE SUBTOTAL 0 01 4701 18 TOTAL 441 24 7,395 778 n m DOWNTOWN PARKING ANALYSIS for DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH -41 SPECIFIC PLAN PREPARED. FOR CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PREPARED BY GREER & CO: Engineers and Planners Anaheim, California APRIL 1993 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 Y ,L INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the parking surveys and analyses for the proposed Downtown Specific Plan for the City of Huntington Beach. The Downtown area encompasses an 11-block core area and 7 . blocks of peripheral area. A Downtown area map is shown in Figure 1 and identifies the various blocks within the study area. ATTACHMENT NO.y-� Greer& Co., Engineers&Planners Downtown Parking Plan (359-01) City of Huntington Brach 1 Z- -------------- on Wilms, -7 IN BLOCKS TINGTON BEACH DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, HUN r � � STUDY METHODOLOGY The study methodology consisted of surveys of the existing parking system within the Downtown area and analyses to identify parking demand parameters with which to project future parking needs for the. development of the Downtown area in accordance with the Specific Plan: 1. Data Collection: Field surveys were conducted to inventory the existing public parking supply within the study area. The inventory included publicly owned and operated parking spaces both on-street and off-street, and privately owned parking spaces generally available for use by the general public. Residential parking was excluded from the inventory. 2. Parking Occupancy Surveys: Surveys of parking occupancy, ie. the number of parked vehicles at a given time, were conducted for both a weekday and a weekend day. Surveys were conducted for all on-street parking spaces and all public parking within the survey area. Surveys were conducted on Friday, February 19, 1993, and Saturday, February 20, 1993. The surveys were conducted at half hour intervals between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. throughout both survey days. The survey data is presented in Appendix tables of this report. 3. Existing Parking Demand Analyses: Based on generalized land use data provided by City, staff, a parking demand ratio was determined for peak parking conditions. The peak parking demand ratio identifies the number of parked vehicles per 1,000 square feet of existing development and reflects the mix of uses presently reflected in the study area. 4. Comparison of Parking Ratios: The peak parking demand ratio was compared to parking demand ratios provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and the Urban Land Institute(ULI), and well as to code parking requirements for the generalized land uses. 5. Analysis of Parking Demand Ratios: Using the current mix of land uses in the Downtown and the ITE and ULI parking demand ratios, the existing peak parking ratio for Downtown ATTACHMENT NO. � Greer&Co., Engineers& Planners Downtown Parking Plan (359-01) City of Huntington Beach 3 as determined through the survey was segregated into parking ratios for each of the major land use categories. 6. Projected Parking Needs: Applying the parking ratios to the projected land uses within the Specific Plan together with an analysis of shared parking potential, the future parking reeds for Downtown was projected. 7. Parking Locations: The spatial distribution of future parking needs was examined on a block by block basis. The space demand for each block together with the pedestrian emphasis for the village concept were used to identify the location of future parking and the number of spaces at each site. The City's "Main Promenade" parking structure was used as the central focus for parking within the Downtown area, particularly south of Orange Avenue. 8. Documentation: This report was prepared to document the objectives of the study, the data surveys, assumptions, analyses, conclusions and findings of the study, and to present specific recommendations for implementation of the Downtown parking plan. ATTACHMENT NO. e Greer& Co., Engineers& Planners Downtown Parking Plan (359-01) City of Huntington Beach 4 PARKING SURVEYS This report chapter presents a discussion of the parking surveys and presents the survey results. PARKING INVENTORY The existing parking spaces in the Downtown study area were inventoried in order to establish an accurate count of spaces along with information as to any time restrictions, metered vs. unmetered, marked or unmarked, and parking fees for either pay parking or meter fees. The parking inventory included all on-street parking spaces within the study area including those that are used primarily for residential parking. The off-street spaces were limited to those spaces that are generally available for use by the general public. The "public" off-street parking spaces included those that are owned and operated by the City for general public parking, and those privately owned and operated spaces that are available to the public for customer or patron parking. For example, the survey did not include those off-street parking spaces at the Post Office that are used for parking and/or loading of postal trucks. The results of the parking inventory is tabulated in Table 1 and shown on Figures 2 through 4. Within the core area consisting of Blocks "A" through "I", there are currently a total of 1,880 parking. spaces with 430 on-street spaces and 1,450 off-street spaces. South of Orange Avenue, there are a total of 1,706 parking spaces with 342 on-street spaces and 1,364 off'-street spaces. North of Orange, there a total of 174 parking spaces with 88 on-street spaces and 86 off-street spaces. The uses within these blocks are primarily commercial with some residential interspersed. The peripheral area includes the five blocks designated B-1, C-1, D-1, E-1 and F-1, which lie between 5th and 6th Streets from.Walnut to Orange, the block between Ist and 2nd Streets and between PCH and Walnut, and the blocks between 2nd and 3rd from Walnut to Orange. The uses in these blocks are primarily residential with the exception of a portion of the block between 1st and 2nd Streets from PCH to Walnut. Within the peripheral area, there are a total of 207 parking spaces with only 12 off-street parking spaces and the remaining 195 parking spaces are on-street. ATTACHMENT NO. w Greer&Co., Engineers& Planners Downtown Parking Plan (359-01) City of Huntington Brach 5 DRAfT TABLE 1 PARKING INVENTORY GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners a zazzzaxxazazzaaaxasaaazaeaexzasaexzasaaac=aazzazazzzaaaaaazzazaaaaazvzaeaaz=caxzzs=zaaaaaazaazezz=zzzz=axzzxxz=ozvzeeza===ezzzzzxzzaazzzzzzeazzzzxcz==zzzzz CURB MARKED METERED 20-24 COST MARKED LOADING 20 MIN OFF BLOCK 2 HR 1 HR MIN HC NR 1 HR 20 MIN HC UNMARKED (YELLOW) (GREEN) STREET TOTAL ------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- Al ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE 5TH 12 25C/hr 12 WALNUT 6 25C/hr 1 7 MAIN 12 25C/hr 12 PCH 7 25C/hr 7 ------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- A2 ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE ------------------------ 61 H 7 7 WALNUT 2 9 11 5TH 17 25C/hr 17 PCH 1 25C/hr 1 OFF STREET ------------------------ Public-Permit 2 54 56 ---------------------- ------ ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- B ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE ------------------------ MAIN 11 2 13 WALNUT 7 3 25C/30 min 10 1ST 9 25C/30 min 9 PCH 0 OFF STREET ➢ierside Pavilion S1/30min 300 300 S6 max C ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE 5TH----- ------ 16 2 18 OLIVE 2 4 2 8 MAIN 6 2 8 WALNUT 8 8 OFF STREET ......... ......-- Life Center 6 6 --- ---------------- ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- 0 ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE ------------------------ MAIN 14 2 16 OLIVE 3 3 6 3RD 11 25C/hr 11 WALNUT 4 2 6 OFF STREET ........................ Main Promenade 830 830 TABLE 1 cont. PARKING INVENTORY GREER b CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners a aaaazassazasaazzaazeazaaaaexaaaaaaaaanaaaxaaaeaaaeeaaaaaaataeaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaxaaaaaaxaanaaaaaaxaaaaaaaaaxaaxaaaesaaaaaxaxaaxxaaaaa_xaaaaaaaxaexxaaaaaaax CURB MARKED METERED 20-24 COST MARKED LOADING 20 MIN OFF BLOCK 2 HR 1 HR MIN HC NR 1 HR 20 MIN HC UNMARKED (YELLOW) (GREEN) STREET TOTAL E ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE ........................ 5TN 15 25C/hr 15 ORANGE NP MAIN 22 25C/hr 22 WALNUT 3 25C/hr 4 7 OFF STREET ........................ office 10 10 Public Lot 33 33 Public Lot 2 48 50 Open Lot 41 41 ------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- F ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE ------------------------ MAIN 12 1 4 17 ORANGE 5 2 2 9 3RD 10 1 11 WALNUT 2 3 5 OFF STREET ........................ office 25 25 ----------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- G ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE 6TH 20 20 MAIN 7 15 2 ORANGE 17 2 19 OFF STREET Retail 17 17 aaaaaaaxaaaxaaxz:aazazaazaaaaasaaaaasaasaaxxaaaaaaaaaaaaa=aaaaaaaaaaasasaaaaaavaaaeaaaaaaasazasaxeavaxaxxaxxa=axa.xaaaxxaaxxeaxxxaaaxaaaaaaxaaaxxaaxxxxxxxxaa TOTALS -- CORE AREA / SOUTH 127 69 14 4 9 2 22 6 78 10 2 1364 1706 aaxaazxaaxaaaax:aesaxaexxxxaxzxaaasaaaaxaaxxaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaxaaaaxaxaaxaaaaaxxaxaaa=xaaaxxxxaxxxxaxx=aaaaxxxxxxxxxxaaaaaaaaaaaaxaxaaaxxx------xx rip D ' m t Z a o • r TABLE 1 cont. PARKING INVENTORY GREER 3 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners a=aazaaaasasaaaaaaeaaaaaaacaa=c=acasaaaasanaacacaaacaaaaaacaaaaacaaa==aaca=aa=a=a==aaaaaasaaacaeaaaaasa=aaa=aacaaa=a=a=aa==a=====aaaaaa=aaaacaaaa=a=acaa===a CURB MARKED METERED 20-24 COST MARKED LOADING 20 MIN OFF BLOCK 2 HR 1 HR MIN HC NR 1 HR 20 MIN HC UNMARKED (YELLOW) (GREEN) STREET TOTAL ------------------------•------ ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---=------ H1 ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE ........................ MAIN 11 2 13 PECAN 8 8 LAKE 23 23 ORANGE 5 5 OFF STREET ------------------------ Laundramat 7 7 H2 ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE ........................ MAIN 2 2 6TH 4 4 LAKE 4 4 PECAN 3 5 8 OFF STREET ........................ Retait 12 12 Retail 10 10 Nicoles Restaurant 32 32 ------------------------------- ------------------------- ---------------•--- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- 1 ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE ........................ MAIN 1 2 3 ACACIA 8 8 LAKE 3 3 6TH 7 7 OFF STREET ........................ office 25 25 aa:z:zazaaczzcaaaaaacsaezaaa=sacecasaaaseaaaaazaazaecaaacaaceaaaaaarccaaacaca===ac=aa=aaaaaaaacx=axaacc=aaaaaaaa=a==aa=a=caaa=a==a==aacaaaeaa==aa===a=as=a=z= TOTALS -- CORE AREA / NORTH 0 0 0 0 I 17 0 0 0 69 0 2 86 174 a cacasazcaeacasaaaaaaaaaaacaaaaaaaaaaa=aca=aeaa=aaaa=aaaa=zaaaaaa=a=saaa=aaaaaacaaaaaaaaaaaaca=a=aaacaaa=aa=aaa=aaaa=aaaaaaa====aaaaaaa=aaaa=x==a==a=as=aa=aa ac=a=aaaaacaa=ac a=aaaaaa=aaaaaaac=aaaaaccaaaaca=aaaaaaa=a==anUa==c=a==aaaa=aaaaaaaa===aaa=aaaac==aaaa=caa==a=aa==aaaa=a==aaa=a=a==a=====c======aa=a===a==aTOTAL CORE AREA SOUTH 3 9 2 =aa 6 78 64 706 TOTAL - CORE AREA / N I 120 60 10 0 I I 17 0 20 0 I 69 I 10 2 I 1386 I 1 ORTH 174 aa=sa:azaaaacaaacaa=aa=acasaaxaaaaaaazacaaaaaa=casaaasasaxacezaacaa====a=aaacaaa===a=ca====ac=a=aaeaaac==aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa=a=a===aa=aaa==aa=a=a=========aaaaa TOTALS -- CORE AREA --- TOTAL 127 69 14 3 26 2 22 6 ( 147 10 4 1450 1880 aaazaaxaxaxaazzaaac=aac=aex=aaaxaxacaaacaa=aacc=aseacaaa=aaacaxa==aaaaaa==caaaaa=aaaaacaa=aaaaaa=acaaaa=aa==aaaaaa=aaaaaa=a==a=aaa=aa===______________aaa=aaa TABLE 1 cont. PARKING INVENTORY GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners z saszsaasazssxaasssssazsaaassaasaaazaaszz=sssasaasaaaassaasaasaszaazaexaaxsaxzsxxsaxsxnxaxxxn=xxssssssssssssssssxssxzszxxxxxxxxxeazszszxzzzzazxxxsxxzxxsxxxx CURB MARKED METERED 20-24 COST MARKED LOADING 20 MIN OFF BLOCK 2 MR 1 MR MIN HC MR 1 MR 20 MIN MC UNMARKED (YELLOW) (GREEN) STREET TOTAL ------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- - ---- B1 ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE ------------------------ 2ND 9 25C/30 min 9 WALNUT 10 25C/30 min 10 1ST NP PCH 3 (6HR) 25C/15 min 3 ------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- Cl ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE ........................ 6TH 13 13 OLIVE 7 7 SIN 17 25C/hr 17 WALNUT 9 9 ------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------- -------- ---- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- D1 ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE 3RD 10 25C/hr 10 OLIVE 9 25C/hr 9 2ND 13 25C/hr 13 WALNUT 6 25C/hr 1 7 OFF STREET ........................ office 12 12 ------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- E1 ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE 6TH 13 13 ORANGE 5 5 5TH 18 25C/hr 18 OLIVE 9 9 ------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- F1 ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE 3RD 15 15 ORANGE 7 7 2ND 12 25C/hr 12 D OLIVE 9 25C/hr 9 azzxasaszasaaezaasaszaasasa---- zzazzzsaaxxxaaszaaaazzaaa azaaaaxzaaasszzzszs zzazzaasaaaszssazsssssess sssseszsss esxxsxsexssxsszsasz szzxsazsax sssszzasss TOTALS - PERIPHERAL AREA 116 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 78 _0____ 0 • 12 207 . � saasasaaxsszazsaassaszzzszaxasa aaszaasasscszsssezzzsaszz zzaxzzzxsxszszzazaa ----szxszz zsaaxxzxzazzx -----zzzss ----xzx_____ zssszs xxsssszxzz sxzzzssxss J 2 aaassavaaszszzasxszszzszaaaxaxx azzzsazzzsxszeszsazzzazzs zzazzaszaserszxazss azassaaszzsssszssszazzzzz szzzszssxs asxxxs==s=zxsszscss szzzzsaxzs sxsx=sxxxz TOTALS - CORE AREA 127 69 14 3 26 2 22 6 147 10 4 1450 1880 Z TOTALS - PERIPHERAL AREA 116 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 78 0 0 12 207 ------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- GRAND TOTALS 243 69 14 3 26 2 23 6 225 10 4 1462 2087 sazazasasssaszzaaszszaazssaxsaz aaszaseassxsazszzaaaaaasa zzeazzszazazszxasza szzazazaazaxasaaxezaFszzs xzzxxzzxss zs=xszsssszszszs=za seszaassas sxa=xxgesa L Trou SUM UW 3 UM --------------------- < 16 MTA-A ---..7rmx l6z IN min 13 MTR-A F -T "A z 7 z L___J L. 21, 11 um it-Iry a7, Iir -IV IT MTI!;Fz bwaTit-0c) 14 MTR"A/Z MTN TL "I L IT IV-- -IR �, I "-I IN—In A r.~1 4 MIR 5 MIR 1--.— I min A nr%n4 r"WWII - ON - STREET - ----------- -J. PARKING SUPPLY ------ DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, HUNTINGTON BEACH ------------------- < > 60 39 P. so. ow"MI D ok F=- 630 OP. P 12 So. Ing. 12.oo I"NMI OFF - ST'RE E T PARKING SUPPLY IF stun DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, HUNTINGTON BEACH L_ J L. -----� ��--Irua--•----J �-------,roy-------� �--------�-------J �--------------..J L_.� j; um 7 VIA .=OKft1TKtf 13 i �111R14 [ p to Joe I�-•-- TTYfA=a----� L----ie will-�..—_.� G '\••� �/�I �ti% �� / / ►I• 0m.ral p1111110I v lejO 2r, ( .v L__J L._-----2 L.._ nld A '1 .� wt i � 11 Y1R-. . M1R�)2 wt1i-►Tct�- � -x=aA .� �"a -� a `PJr n�,Qi�,�+v°L{•� /'� �.►j" ••� i 11 NIR-A/Y-Y1R-A(GC) l MTR-A S YIR- t:CI.,--.�rl12�JQ�/l.11Il'_ILfi ___t_U1L 1 J N vrbM on 91. a.rl— 11 MIS �?IlN- to u-71=aq--" ►i-u7►lR- �1 J�j,/ .Im 11.1n 10 MIR ID�1:T7R —Wt 3..{I�IJ�fl„ / I5 • 1 1 L 4 MIR flo"_j 1____ ------- 1 MIR �,O MBA- M no�s 11.111 E EffT PARKING SUPPLY - 17T ffK[i �ti� - �•� _ _ ._.__..moles—_____—__—._—.,___—_.—___• ;/ •'� DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, HUNTINGTON BEACH s Within the entire study area, there are 2,087 parking spaces with 625 on-street parking spaces and 1,462 off-street parking spaces. PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEYS Parking occupancy surveys were conducted throughout the study area on Friday and Saturday, February 19 and 20, 1993. The surveys were conducted at each half hour between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. The intent was to identify the number of parked vehicles at each survey period throughout the day. The utilization of existing on-street and off-street parking spaces was determined as a percentage of the total available parking spaces. The survey data for each block face and for each off-street parking area is presented in Appendix Tables A-1. The tables are presented for each individual block within the study area, including the peripheral area. The parking occupancy data is summarized by block in Table 2. For Friday, the peak parking occupancy occurred at 5:30 p.m. with 32.1 percent or 670 of 2,087 parking spaces occupied throughout the study area. Within the core area, peak parking occupancy also occurred at 5:30 p.m. with 30.0 percent or 564 of 1,880 parking spaces occupied. The south core area i southerly of Orange Avenue also reached peak occupancy at 5:30 p.m. with 28.9 percent occupancy with 493 of 1,706 parking spaces occupied. The north core area reached peak occupancy at 6:00 p.m. with 42.5 percent occupancy with 74 of 174 parking spaces occupied. The peripheral area, which is predominantly residential, demonstrated higher parking occupancies ranging from 42 to 52 percent occupancy rates. Generally, throughout the study area, parking occupancy rates steadily increased - throughout the day from 17.6 percent at 9:00 a.m. to 32.1 percent at 5:30 p.m. Similar patterns were 1 exhibited in the core area increasing from 14.8 percent at 9:00 a.m. to 30.0 percent at 5:30 p.m., and within the south core area increasing from 12.7 percent at 9:00 a.m. to 28.9 percent at 5:30 p.m. For Saturday, peak parking occupancy rates were slightly higher than for Friday. Peak parking P P a P Y � Y b Y P a occupancy occurred at 6:00 p.m. throughout the study area and within the core. Throughout the study area, peak parking occupancy reached 37.0 percent, while within the core area, it reached 35.0 percent. Within the south core area, occupancy rates ranged from 15.2 percent at 9:00 a.m. generally increasing to 33.8 percent at 6:00 p.m. Within the north core area, occupancy rates fluctuated between a low of 42.0 percent to a high of 50.6 percent throughout the day. In the peripheral area, occupancy rates also fluctuated throughout the day between a low of 43.0 percent and a high of 55.1 percent. In general terms, parking utilization ranged between 30 and 37 percent of the total available parking spaces at periods of peak occupancy on both Friday and Saturday. Similar percentages apply for the core area with only 30 to 35 percent of the available parking spaces occupied at peak parking periods. Within the south core area, the percentages are slightly lower with the larger parking facilities available. Peak parking occupancy ranges between 29 and 34 percent. Within the north core area with smaller off- street lots available and most parking being available as on-street parking, peak parking occupancies generally ranged between 31 and 50 percent. Substantial parking spaces are available throughout the Downtown area throughout the day. ATTACHMENT NO. Greer& Co., Engineers& Planners Downtown Parking Plan (359-01) City of Huntington Beach 13 ' _ I DRAFT. ABLE 2 EXISTING PARKING - SUMMARY GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners x:aaaaasaaaasasaaa=:asasaazazasecaaazazaaaaaazc=aa==eaaasaaaaa=zzaseaazaz:aena=z=aa==eezazzzzzzaazz===a=a=azaaa==acz==zza=z=z=z=cozozae=a=aas=zzz=a=zezz==v==c=ze==c=ezv=aez= ARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES BY BLOCK - CORE CORE CORE Al A2 B C D E F G SOUTH H1 H2 I NORTH TOTAL jo. OF SPACES 38 92 332 48 869 178 67 82 1706 56 72 46 174 1880 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ 'KG OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % N0. % NO % NO. X NO. % RI, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC IME OF DAY 1:00 a.m. 18 47.4% 18 19.6% 28 8.4% 23 47.9% 46 5.3% 29 16.3% 34 50.7% 20 24.4% 216 12.7% 23 41.1% 20 27.8% 20 43.5% 63 36.2% 279 14.8% ':30 21 55.3% 27 29.3% 29 8.77. 26 54.2% 46 5.3% 35 19.7% 26 38.8% 20 24.4% 230 13.5% 21 37.5% 24 33.3% 15 32.6% 60 34.5% 290 1r 0:00 20 52.6% 26 28.3% 27 8.1% 29 60.4% 56 6.4% 35 19.7% 36 53.7% 18 22.0% 247 14.5% 25 44.6% 23 31.9% 13 28.3X 61 35.1% 308 1. 0:30 25 65.8% 29 31.5% 40 12.0% 28 58.3% 62 7.1% 50 28.1% 37 55.2% 25 30.5% 296 17.4% 20 35.7% 22 30.6% 12 26.1% 54 31.0% 350 18.6% 1:00 25 65.8% 28 30.4% 40 12.0% 29 60.4% 65 7.5% 50 28.1% 38 56.7% 26 31.77 301 17.6% 17 30.4% 22 30.6% 17 37.0% 56 32.2% 357 19.0% 1:30 a.m. 26 68.4% 31 33.77 41 12.3% 29 60.4% 69 7.9% 51 28.7% 39 58.2% 24 29.3% 310 18.2% 25 44.6% 22 30.6% 16 34.8% 63 36.2% 373 19.8% loom 37 97.4% 38 41.3% 51 15.4% 27 56.3% 83 9.6% 62 34.8% 46 68.7% 27 32.9% 371 21.7% 19 33.9% 25 34.71A 18 39.1% 62 35.6% 433 23.0% 2:30 p.m. 34 89.5% 43 46.7% 59 17.8% 29 60.4% 87 10.0% 64 36.0% 47 70.1% 34 41.5% 397 23.3% 30 53.6% 23 31.9% 19 41.3% 72 41.4% 469 24.9% :00 36 94.7X 41 44.6% 56 16.9% 27 56.3% 88 10.1% 61 34.3% 41 61.2% 32 39.0% 382 22.4% 18 32.1% 25 34.7% 18 39.1% 61 35.1% 443 23.6% :30 33 86.8% 46 50.0% 65 19.6% 23 47.9% 99 11.4% 71 39.9% 50 74.6% 28 34.1% 415 24.3% 19 33.9% 21 29.2% 14 30.4% 54 31.0% 469 24.9% ':00 35 92.1% 53 57.6% 70 21.1% 25 52.1% 110 12.7% 67 37.6% 47 70.1% 30 36.6% 437 25.6% 23 41.1% 23 31.9% 16 34.8% 62 35.6% 499 26.5X :30 36 94.7% 52 56.5% 75 22.6% 28 58.3% 111 12.8% 69 38.8% 44 65.7% 30 36.6% 445 26.1% 26 46.4% 20 27.8% 13 28.3% 59 33.9% 504 26.8% •:00 35 92.1% 51 55.4% 79 23.8% 29 60.4% 116 13.3% 65 36.5% 39 58.2% 39 47.6% 453 26.6% 22 39.3% 25 34.7% 17 37.0% 64 36.8% 517 27.5% :30 29 76.3% 41 44.6% 80 24.1% 32 66.7% 119 13.7% 64 36.0% 42 62.7% 42 51.2% 449 26.3% 22 39.3% 22 30.6% 16 34.8% 60 34.5% 509 27.1% :00 35 92.1% 47 51.1% 80 24.1X 30 62.5% 127 14.6% 72 40.4% 44 65.7% 39 47.6% 474 27.8% 22 39.3% 24 33.3% 15 32.6% 61 35.1% 535 28.5% :30 35 92.1% 43 46.7% 86 25.9% 26 54.2% 144 16.6% 74 41.6% 43 64.2% 34 41.5% 485 28.4% 23 41.1% 22 30.6% 16 34.8% 61 35.1% 546 29.0% :00 33 86.8% 38 41.3% 87 26.2X 24 50.0% 156 18.0% 73 41.0% 46 68.7% 35 42.7% 492 28.8% 22 39.3% 22 30.6% 17 37.0% 61 35.1% 553 29.4% :30 32 84.2% 48 52.2% 79 23.8% 22 45.8% 168 19.3% 67 37.6% 46 68.7X 31 37.8% 493 28.9% 22 39.3% 28 38.9% 21 45.7% 71 40.8% 564 30.0% :00 P.M. 32 84.2% 43 46.7% 78 23.5% 22 45.8% 173 19.9% 66 37.1% 42 62.7% 30 36.6% 486 28.5% 25 44.6% 28 38.9% 21 45.7% 74 42.5% 560 29.8% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ KG OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. X N0. X NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X AT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC IME OF DAY :00 a.m. 20 52.6% 28 30.4% 33 9.9% 23 47.9% 57 6.6% 37 20.8% 32 47.8% 30 36.6% 260 15.2% 25 44.6% 23 31.9% 27 58.7% 75 43.1% 335 17 R% :30 22 57.9% 26 28.3% 38 11.4% 26 54.2% 61 7.0% 39 21.9% 31 46.3% 31 37.8% 274 16.1% 25 44.6% 23 31.9% 29 63.0% 77 44.3% 351 ' c 0:00 27 71.1% 34 37.0% 44 13.3% 28 58.3% 64 7.4% 43 24.2% 28 41.8% 30 36.6% 298 17.5% 32 57.1% 26 36.1% 28 60.9% 86 49.4% 384 2u.4% 0:30 27 71.1% 42 45.7% 46 13.9% 31 64.6% 68 7.8% 48 27.0% 35 52.2% 33 40.2% 330 19.3% 30 53.6% 24 33.3% 25 54.3% 79 45.4% 409 21.8% 1:00 31 81.6% 46 50.0% 50 15.1% 32 66.7% 69 7.9% 52 29.2% 35 52.2% 34 41.5% 349 20.5% 29 51.8% 23 31.9% 28 60.9% 80 46.0% 429 22.8% 1:30 a.m. 27 71.1% 47 51.1% 47 14.2% 29 60.4% 70 8.1% 57 32.0% 37 55.2% 32 39.0% 346 20.3% 31 55.4% 25 34.7% 32 69.6% 88 50.6% 434 23.1% )ON 25 65.8% 51 55.4% 55 16.6% 26 54.2% 75 8.6% 57 32.0% 36 53.7% 37 45.1% 362 21.2% 31 55.4% 31 43.1% 24 52.2% 86 49.4% 448 23.8% 2:30 p.m. > 25 65.8% 49 53.3% 60 18.1% 27 56.3% 118 13.6% 53 29.8% 30 44.8% 36 43.9% 398 23.3% 28 50.0% 30 41.7% 23 50.0% 81 46.6% 479 25.5% 00 25 65.8% 56 60.9% 63 19.0% 26 54.2% 158 18.2% 46 25.8% 30 44.8% 40 48.8% 444 26.0% 31 55.4% 29 40.3% 23 50.0% 83 47.7% 527 28.0% 30 24 63.2% 54 58.7% 68 20.5% 26 54.2% 183 21.1% 57 32.0% 30 44.8% 36 43.9% 478 28.0% 30 53.6% 24 33.3% 28 60.9% 82 47.1% 560 29.8% :00 > 28 73.7% 48 52.2% 78 23.5% 32 66.7% 195 22.4% 61 34.3% 31 46.3% 35 42.7X 508 29.8% 25 44.6% 32 44.4% 29 63.0% 86 49.4% 594 31.6% :30 27 71.1% 48 52.2% 77 23.2% 30 62.5% 192 22.1% 58 32.6% 27 40.3% 35 42.7% 494 29.0% 21 37.5% 29 40.3% 29 63.0% 79 45.4% 573 30.5% :00 37 97.4% 57 62.0% 78 23.5% 29 60.4% 192 22.1% 49 27.5% 25 37.3% 41 50.0% 508 29.8% 21 37.5% 33 45.8% 19 41.3% T3 42.0% 581 30.9% :30 = 35 92.1% 63 68.5% 91 27.4% 34 70.8% 193 22.2% 49 27.5% 22 32.8% 41 50.0% 528 30.9% 30 53.6% 30 41.7% 22 47.8% 82 47.1X 610 32.4% :00 31 81.6% 58 63.0% 91 27.4% 29 60.4% 218 25.1% 52 29.2% 28 41.8% 37 45.1% 544 31.9% 28 50.0% 29 40.3% 21 45.7% 78 44.8% 622 33.1% •30 m 32 84.2% 60 65.2% 95 28.6% 26 54.2% 215 24.7% 59 33.1% 31 46.3% 40 48.8% 558 32.7% 26 46.4% 31 43.1% 22 47.8% 79 45.4% 637 33.9% 00 29 76.3% 58 63.0% 99 29.8% 25 52.1% 227 26.1% 58 32.6% 31 46.3% 42 51.2% 569 33.4% 28 50.0% 32 44.4% 23 50.0% 83 47.7% 652 34.7% •30 z 32 84.2% 52 56.5% 87 26.2% 26 54.2% 248 28.5% 49 27.5% 30 44.8% 36 43.9% 560 32.8% 23 41.1% 41 56.9% 21 45.71% 85 48.9% 645 34.3% :00 P.M. 29 76.3% 44 47.8X 80 24.1% 28 58.3% 270 31.1% 53 29.8% 32 47.8% 40 48.8% 576 33.8% 24 42.9% 41 56.9% 17 37.0% 82 47.1% 658 35.0% z oil TABLE 2 cont. EXISTING PARKING - SUMMARY GREER 8 CO. - i EXISTING PARKING - SUMMARY DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH :aaxxsaaaaaaaazaxaaaxaxaaaaaaaaa_caaaaaaaaaaaasaaxzasaaaxaxaxaaaaaaxaaazaaaaaa=aaaasa aaaaaaaaaaaaaazaaasaasa_ns_aaaaaaxaaaxxzxxaaxxaxx__x�xa_ PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES BY BLOCK - PERIPHERAL PARKING SUPPLY B1 Cl D1 E1 F1 TOTAL CORE PERIPHERAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES 22 46 51 45 43 207 NO. OF SPACES 1880 207 2087 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ................. ............ PKG OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % FRI, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC DATE PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 6 27.3% 22 47.8% 21 41.2% 18 40.0% 21 48.8% 88 42.5% 9:00 a.m. 279 14.8% 88 42.5% 367 17.6% 9:30 7 31.8% 22 47.8% 21 41.2% 19 42.2% 21 48.8% 90 43.5% 9:30 290 15.4% 90 43.5% 380 18.2% 10:00 10 45.5% 24 52.2% 21 41.2% 14 31.1% 20 46.5% 89 43.0% 10:00 308 16.4% 89 43.0% 397 19.0% 10:30 9 40.9% 25 54.3% 24 47.1% 18 40.0% 22 51.2% 98 47.3% 10:30 350 18.6% 98 47.3% 448 21.5% 11:00 9 40.9% 24 52.2% 21 41.2% 18 40.0% 20 46.5% 92 44.4% 11:00 357 19.0% 92 44.4% 449 21.5% 11:30 a.m. 9 40.9% 28 60.9% 20 39.2% 18 40.0% 18 41.9% 93 44.9% 11:30 a.m. 373 19.8% 93 44.9% 466 22.4% NOON 13 59.1% 31 67.4% 18 35.3% 17 37.8% 23 53.5% 102 49.3% NOON 433 23.0% 102 49.3% 535 25.7% 12:30 p.m. 14 63.6% 29 63.0% 22 43.1% 16 35.6% 24 55.8% 105 50.7% 12:30 p.m. 469 24.9% 105 50.7% 575 27.5% 1:00 15 68.2% 32 69.6% 23 45.1% 13 28.9% 24 55.8% 107 51.7% 1:00 443 23.6% 107 51.7% 551 26.4% 1:30 11 50.0% 31 67.4% 18 35.3% 18 40.0% 22 51.2% 100 48.3% 1:30 469 24.9% 100 48.3% 569 27.3% 2:00 14 63.6% 28 60.9% 20 39.2% 15 33.3% 22 51.2% 99 47.8% 2:00 499 26.5% 99 47.8% 598 28.7% 2:30 15 68.2% 26 56.5% 25 49.0% 15 33.3% 20 46.5% 101 48.8% 2:30 504 26.8% 101 48.8% 605 29.0% 3:00 14 63.6% 30 65.2% 25 49.0% 17 37.8% 22 51.2% 108 52.2% 3:00 517 27.5% 108 52.2% 626 30.0% 3:30 15 68.2% 27 58.7% 22 43.1% 16 35.6% 22 51.2% 102 49.3% 3:30 509 27.1% 102 49.3% 611 29.3% 4:00 15 68.2% 2S 54.3% 19 37.3% 16 35.6% 19 44.2% 94 45.4% 4:00 535 28.5% 94 45.4% 629 30.2% 4:30 14 63.6% 26 56.5% 18 35.3% 17 37.8% 22 51.2% 97 46.9% 4:30 546 29.0% 97 46.9% 643 30.8% 5:00 13 59.1% 25 54.3% 26 51.0% 17 37.8% 20 46.5% 101 48.8% 5:00 553 29.4% 101 48.8% 654 31.4% 5:30 13 59.1% 26 56.5% 24 47.1% 17 37.8% 25 58.1% 105 50.7% 5:30 564 30.0% 105 50.7% 670 32.1% 6:00 p.m. 11 50.0% 27 58.7% 28 54.9% 16 35.6% 23 53.5% 105 50.7% 6:00 p.m. 560 29.8% 105 50.7% 666 31.9% ------------------------------- ------------ PKG OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % N0. % NO. % PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC DATE PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 15 68.2% 26 56.5% 22 43.1% 21 46.7% 20 46.5% 104 50.2% 9:00 a.m. 335 17.8% 104 50.2% 440 21.1% 9:30 16 72.7% 28 60.9% 23 45.1% 20 44.4% 23 53.5% 110 53.1% 9:30 351 18.7% 110 53.1% 462 22.1% 10:00 16 72.7% 26 56.5% 23 45.1% 21 46.7% 22 51.2% 108 52.2% 10:00 384 20.4% 108 52.2% 493 23.6% 10:30 13 59.1% 27 58.7% 20 39.2% 16 35.6% 21 48.8% 97 46.9% 10:30 409 21.8% 87 42.0% 496 23.8% 11:00 16 72.7% 29 63.0% 18 35.3% 19 42.2% 22 51.2% 104 50.2% 11:00 429 22.8% 104 50.2% 534 25.6% 11:30 a.m. 14 63.6% 30 65.2% 17 33.3% 20 44.4% 20 46.5% 101 48.8% 11:30 a.m. 434 23.1% 101 48.8% 535 25.7% ` NOON 14 63.6% 30 65.2% 16 31.4% 16 35.6X 21 48.8% 97 46.9% NOON 448 23.8% 97 46.9% 545 26.1% C 12:30 p.m. 13 59.1% 31 67.4% 18 35.3% 19 42.2% 19 44.2% 100 48.3% 12:30 p.m. 479 25.5% 100 48.3% 579 27.8% 1:00 13 59.1% 31 67.4% 18 35.3% 20 44.4% 21 48.8% 103 49.8% 1:00 527 28.0% 103 49.8% 630 30.2% 1:30 12 54.5% 33 71.7% 17 33.3% 18 40.0% 20 46.5% 100 48.3% 1:30 560 29.8% 100 48.3% 660 31.6% 2:00 12 54.5% 33 71.7% 25 49.0% 19 42.2% 20 46.5% 109 52.7% 2:00 594 31.6% 109 52.7% 704 33.7% Z 2:30 13 59.1% 33 71.7% 23 45.1% 24 53.3% 20 46.5% 113 54.6% 2:30 573 30.5% 113 54.6% 687 32.9% rT 3:00 16 72.7% 32 69.6% 22 43.1% 21 46.7X 23 53.5% 114 55.1% 3:00 581 30.9% 114 55.1% 696 33.3% G 3:30 13 59.1% 31 67.4% 20 39.2% 18 40.0% 20 46.5% 102 49.3% 3:30 610 32.4% 102 49.3% 712 34.1% 4:00 16 72.7% 27 58.7% 18 35.3% 18 40.0% 23 53.5% 102 49.3% 4:00 622 33.1% 102 49.3% 724 34.7% 4:30 15 68.2% 24 52.2% 17 33.3% 15 33.3% 22 51.2% 93 44.9% 4:30 637 33.9% 93 44.9% 730 35.0% G 5:00 15 68.2% 23 50.0% 18 35.3% 13 28.9% 20 46.5% 89 43.0% 5:00 652 34.7% 89 43.0% 741 35.5% �. 5:30 14 63.6% 24 52.2% 25 49.0% 14 31.1% 21 48.8% 98 47.3% 5:30 645 34.3% 98 47.3% 743 35.6% • 6:00 p.m. 18 81.8% 28 60.9% 30 58.8% 16 35.6% 22 51.2% 114 55.1% 6:00 p.m. 658 35.0% 114 55.1% 773 37.0% EXISTING PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS ` Usingthe current development pattern within the core area a parking demand ratio can be calculated P P . P g for the present mix of uses within the Downtown area. Because much of the current parking, both on- street and off-street is open to general parking, the parking demand ratio is reflective of not only current parking demands but also of the current shared parking that takes place by the various uses in Downtown. It would be representative of a realistic or practical parking requirement for future Downtown development. Based on data from City staff, the following uses presently exist within the Downtown core area as separated for the north and south areas of the core: Block Office Retail Restaurant Theater A 40,920 sf 32,110 sf 17,303 sf B 36,000 sf 35,846 sf 23,773 sf 1,750 seats C 17,461 sf 31,652 sf 23,329 sf D 4,000 sf 24,000 sf 4,000 sf E 8,000 sf 19,000 sf j F 12,000 sf 14,000 sf Subtotal 118,381 sf 156,608 sf 68,405 sf 1,750 seats G 25,000 sf H 2O,000 sf I 5,000 sf 5,000 sf Subtotal 0 50,000 sf 5,000 sf 0 Total 118,381 sf 206,608 sf 73,405 sf 1,750 seats Assuming 15 square feet per seat for the theater, or a total of 26,250 square feet, there is a total of 369,644 square feet of existing development within the south core area, and 55,000 square feet within the north core area. Peak parking demand for the south core area was 493 vehicles on Friday and 576 vehicles on Saturday. The peak parking demand ratio would be 1.33 spaces per 1,000 square feet of use for Friday and 1.56 spaces per 1,000 square feet for Saturday. For the north core area, the peak parking demand was 74 vehicles for Friday and 88 vehicles for Saturday. The peak parking demand ratio would be 1.35 spaces per 1,000 square feet for Friday and 1.60 spaces per 1,000 square feet for Saturday. These parking demand ratios are remarkably similar for the two core areas. ATTACHMENT NO. Greer& Co., Engineers&Planners Downtown Parking Plan (359-01) Ciry of Huntington Beach 16 COMPARISON OF PARKING RATIOS A comparison was made of the actual parking demand for various hours of the day versus the calculated P P o Y parking demand using parking demand rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)t and the shared parking factors from the Urban Land Institute (ULI). The peak parking demand ratios obtained from ITE for the four land use categories are presented below: Friday Saturday office 2.79 spaces/1,000 sf NA (assumed 0) retail 3.23 spaces/1,000 sf 3.97 spaces/1,000 sf restaurant 10.79 spaces/1,000 sf* 11.43 spaces/1,000 sf* theater 0.19 spaces/seat 0.19 spaces/seat " assumes an average between family restaurant and quality restaurant '`-These parking demand ratios were applied to the development area for each of the uses within the south core area. The ULI factors were applied for the monthly variation and for the hourly variation each day �rb� jfgr a weekday and a Saturday. Comparisons for the south core area for five time periods throughout tfie day were calculated and are summarized below. / FRIDAY SATURDAY ACTUAL CALCULATED ACTUAL CALCULATED PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING PERIOD DEMAND DEMAND DEMAND DEMAND 9:00 a.m. 216 504 260 419 noon 371 981 362 1,186 2:00 p.m. 437 1,156 508 956 4:00 p.m. 474 998 544 857 6:00 p.m. 493 1,063 576 997 For the Friday comparison, the calculated parking demand was significantly larger than the actual parking demand by a factor ranging between 2.11 and 2.65. The Saturday comparison also showed a calculated parking demand larger than the actual, but by a smaller factor ranging between 1.58 and L88 except for the noon period, which was larger by a factor of 2.36. On the average, the actual parking demand was approximately 42 percent of the calculated parking demand for Friday and about 55 percent' of the calculated parking demand for Saturday. t Parking Generation, Second Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers,Washington, D.C., 1987. Greer& Co., Engineers& Planner n No. (359.01) City of Hunringwn Beach 17 As applied to Downtown Huntington Beach, the ULI shared parking methodology should reflect a reduction in the ITE peak parking rates to provide results based on the calibration above using current parking demand data. Based on the results of the existing parking demand analysis, the ITE peak parking demand rates should be reduced to approximately 55 percent for the weekday rates and approximately 70 percent for the Saturday rates. This would allow a factor of safety of some 13 to 15 percent over and above the actual rates of 42 percent and 55 percent for a weekday and a Saturday, respectively, as calculated above. ATTACHMENT N0.L�, Greer& Co., Engineers& Planners Downtown Parking Plan (359-01) City of Huntington Beath 18 PROJECTED PARKING NEEDS FUTURE PEAK PARKING DEMAND RATIOS In order to reflect actual parking demand rates as presently exhibited in the Downtown area, the future peak parking demand ratios should reflect the reductions in the ITE peak parking demand rates to be used in the ULI shared parking analysis. Based on these analyses, the ITE peak parking demand rates should be reduced to approximately 55 percent for weekday rates and 70 percent for the Saturday rates. The peak parking rates to be applied for future projections of parking needs would be the following based on applying these reductions to the ITE rates presented earlier: Fridav Saturdav office 1.53 spaces/1,000 sf NA (assumed 0) retail 1.78 spaces/1,000 sf 2.78 spaces/1,000 sf restaurant 5.93 spaces/1,000 sf* 8.00 spaces/1,000 sf* theater 0.10 spaces/seat 0.13 spaces/seat * assumes an average between family restaurant and quality restaurant The rates were applied to the projected future land uses as presented in the Downtown Specific Plan to identify future parking needs by block for the core area. Again, these projections do not include parking needs for residential uses. Residential parking is to be provided entirely on-site for each residential development project and will not utilize or share the Downtown commercial parking. ATTACHMENT NO. ►- -z - Greer& Co., Engineers& Planners Downtown Parking Plan (359-01) City of Huntington Brach 19 Block Office Retail Restaurant Other A 10,000 sf 45,000 sf 10,000 sf 12 units bed/breakfast B 16,000 sf 34,459 sf 23,773 sf 1,750 seats C 12,000 sf 40,000 sf 10,000 sf D 4,000 sf 24,000 sf 4,000 sf E 8,000 sf 20,000 sf F 20,000 sf 10,000 sf Subtotal 70,000 sf 173,459 sf 47,773 sf 12 units bed/breakfast 1,750 seats G 30,000 sf H 30,000 sf I 5,000 sf 5,000 sf Subtotal 0 65,000 sf 5,000 sf 0 Total 70,000 sf 238,459 sf 52,773 sf 12 units bed/breakfast 1,750 seats A these peak parking demand rates and the ULI shared parkin; factors to the projected land use Pplying,b quantities results in the projected parking demands for each block. Projected Parking Needs Weekdav Saturday Block Noon 2 44 6Q0 Noon 2:00 6:00 A 102 109 106 104 130 133 B 190 277 311 186 281 400 C 99 106 101 95 119 126 D 49 51 48 53 64 62 E 37 38 25 35 42 27 F 41 43 18 18 21 14 Subtotal 518 624 609 491 657 762 G 39 39 33 53 63 41 H 39 39 33 53 63 41 I 21 24 32 21 28 43 Subtotal 99 102 98 127 154 125 Total 617 726 707 618 811 887 Greer& Co., Engineers& Planners Downtown Parking Plan (359-01) ATTACHMENT NO. q t) City of Huntington Beach 20 Based on the above analyses, the projected peak parking demand for the core area of Downtown will be a total of 887 parking spaces. However, if separate consideration is given to the north and south areas of the core, the peak parking requirement for the south core area would be 762 parking spaces with an additional 154 parking spaces required for the north core area. This is a combined total of 916 parking spaces. t 1 � ATTACHMENT NO. ►3 4 Greer& Co., Engineers& Planners Downtown Parking Plan (359-01) City of Huntington Beach 21 TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK Al GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTING70N BEACH Engineers and Planners agar_acaccaacaazazaaazaacaazazacaazaezzazaaseaaaaezaaa=zzzaaaaaezezazaaeaazaczzzaaa-_aasaaaaa__aazaazcaazaaasaaaoaaaaz=aaaxazazazzz==aza==axe=e=za PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET 5TH WALNUT MAIN PCH TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES . 12 7 12 7 38 0 38 ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % N0. % NO. % NO. % NO. % N0. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % FR1, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 4 33.3% 2 28.6% 11 91.77. 1 14.3% 18 47.4% 18 47.4% 9:30 4 33.3% 4 57.1% 12 100.0% 1 14.3% 21 55.3% 21 55.3% 10:00 1 8.3% 8 114.3% 7 58.3% 4 57.1% 20 52.6% 20 52.6% 10:30 3 25.0% 6 85.7% 11 91.7% 5 71.4% 25 65.8% 25 65.8% 11:00 3 25.0% '6 85.7% 11 91.7% 5 71.4% 25 65.8% 25 65.8% 11:30 a.m. 3 25.0% 7 100.0% 12 100.0% 4 57.1% 26 68.4% 26 68.4% NOON 10 83.3% 9 128.6% 12 100.0% 6 85.7% 37 97.4% 37 97.4% 12:30 p.m. 8 66.7% 8 114.3% 12 100.0% 6 85.7% 34 89.5% 34 89.5% 1:00 9 75.0% 9 128.6% 12 100.0% 6 85.7% 36 94.7% 36 94.7% 1:30 9 75.0% 6 85.7% 12 100.0% 6 85.7% 33 86.8% 33 86.8% 2:00 9 75.0% 9 128.6% 12 100.0% 5 71.4% 35 92.1% 35 92.1% 2:30 9 75.0% 9 128.6% 12 100.0% 6 85.7% 36 94.7% 36 94.7% 3:00 8 66.7Y. 8 114.3% 12 100.0% 7 100.0% 35 92.1% 35 92.1% 3:30 7 58.3% 7 100.0% 12 100.0% 3 42.9% 29 76.3% 29 76.3% 4:00 9 75.0% 8 114.3% 12 100.0% 6 85.7% 35 92.1% 35 92.1% 4:30 9 75.0% 7 100.0% 12 100.0% 7 100.0% 35 92.1% 35 92.1% 5:00 7 58.3% 9 128.6% 12 100.0% 5 71.4% 33 86.8% 33 86.8% 5:30 8 66.71/ 8 114.3% 12 100.0% 4 57.1% 32 84.2% 32 84.2% 6:00 p.m. 9 75.0% 7 100.0% 11 91.7% 5 71.4% 32 84.2% 32 84.2% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % N0. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD. OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 2 16.7Y. 4 57.1% 12 100.0% 2 28.6% 20 52.6% 20 52.6% D 9:30 3 25.0% 6 85.7% 12 100.0% 1 14.3% 22 57.9% 22 57.9% 10:00 4 33.3% 8 114.3% 12 100.0% 3 42.9% 27 71.1% 27 71.1% 10:30 5 41.7Y. 7 100.0% 12 100.0% 3 42.9% 27 71.1% 27 71.1% D 11:00 5 41.7% 9 128.6% 12 100.0% 5 71.4% 31 81.6% 31 81.6% 11:30 a.m. 3 25.0% 7 100.0% 12 100.0% 5 71.4% 27 71.1% 27 71.1% NOON 4 33.3% 6 85.7% 12 100.0% 3 42.9% 25 65.8% 25 65.8% 12:30 p.m. 4 33.3% 6 85.7% 12 100.0% 3 42.9% 25 65.8% 25 65.8% 1:00 5 41.71A 6 85.7% 12 100.0% 2 28.6% 25 65.8% 25 65.8% t1 1:30 4 33.3% 5 71.4% 12 100.0% 3 42.9% 24 63.2% 24 63.2% z 2:00 5 41.7Y. 7 100.0% 12 100.0% 4 57.1% 28 73.7% 28 73.7% 2:30 5 41.71A 7 100.0% 12 100.0% 3 42.9% 27 71.1% 27 71.1% 3:00 11 91.7% 9 128.6% 12 100.0% 5 71.4% 37 97.4% 37 97.4% z 3:30 12 100.0% 8 114.3% 12 100.0% 3 42.9% 35 92.1% 35 92.1% O 4:00 10 83.3% 8 114.3% 11 91.7% 2 28.6% 31 81.6% 31 81.6% 4:30 11 91.77.. 9 128.6% 10 83.3% 2 28.6% 32 84.2% 32 84.2% 5:00 9 75.0% 7 100.0% 12 100.0% 1 14.3% 29 76.3% 29 76.3% -L 5:30 7 58.3% 8 114.3% 12 100.0% 5 71.4% 32 84.2% 32 84.2% 6:00 p.m. 8 66.7% 6 85.7% 11 91.7% 4 57.1% 29 76.3% 29 76:3% Adak c / 11 t TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOC GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners xzxzzxezaxaxzxxzzzzaaaazaaazxzae=axzaazaaasaaxaazzzaaxxszaazszszzzazza=azaxzzza==zaazzz=ea=aaz=xx=vzxzxaaaaz=z==c=ex=x=xzazzvzzxzzzz==xaazze==o=xza PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET 6TH WALNUT 5TH PCH TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES 7 11 17 1 36 56 56 92 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % FRI, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 5 71.4% 4 36.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 25.0% 9 16.1% 9 16.1% 18 19.6% 9:30 6 85.7% 8 72.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 38.9% 13 23.2% 13 23.2% 27 29.3% 10:00 6 85.7% 8 72.7% 1 5.9% 0 0.0% 15 41.7% 11 19.6% 11 19.6% 26 28.3% 10:30 6 85.7% 8 72.7% 2 11.8% 0 0.0% 16 44.4% 13 23.2% 13 23.2% 29 31.5% 11:00 6 85.7% 8 72.7% 2 11.8% 0 0.0% 16 44.4% 12 21.4% 12 21.4% 28, 30.4% 11:30 a.m. 7 100.0% 8 72.7% 3 17.6% 1 100.0% 19 52.8% 12 21.4% 12 21.4% 31 33.7% NOON 6 85.7% 8 72.7% 6 35.3% 3 300.0% 23 63.9% 15 26.8% 15 26.8% 38 41.3% 12:30 p.m. 5 71.4% 7 63.6% 15 88.2% 0 0.0% 27 75.0% 16 28.6% 16 28.6% 43 46.7% 1:00 5 71.4% 6 54.5% 14 82.4% 1 100.0% 26 72.2% 15 26.8% 15 26.8% 41 44.6% 1:30 4 57.1% 8 72.7% 15 88.2X 3 300.0% 30 83.3% 16 28.6% 16 28.6% 46 50.0% 2:00 7 100.0% 8 72.7% 17 100.0% 4 400.0% 36 100.0% 17 30.4% 17 30.4% 53 57.6% 2:30 7 100.0% 8 72.7% 18 105.9% 4 400.0% 37 102.8% 15 26.8% 15 26.8% 52 56.5% 3:00 6 85.7% 7 63.6% 16 94.1% 4 400.0% 33 91.77 18 32.1% 18 32.1% 51 55.4% 3:30 5 71.4% 6 54.5% 15 88.2% 3 300.0% 29 80.6% 12 21.4% 12 21.4% 41 44.6% 4:00 6 85.7% 7 63.6% 17 100.0% 2 200.0% 32 88.9% 15 26.8% 15 26.8% 47 51.1% 4:30 5 71.4% 8 72.7% 14 82.4% 3 300.0% 30 83.3% 13 23.2% 13 23.2% 43 46.7% 5:00 7 100.0% 6 54.5% 10 58.8% 4 400.0% 27 75.0% 11 19.6% 11 19.6% 38 41.3% 5:30 6 85.7% 8 72.7% 15 88.2% 4 400.0% 33 91.7% 15 26.8% 15 26.8% 48 52.2% 6:00 p.m. 7 100.0% 8 72.7% 12 70.6X 2 200.0% 29 80.67 14 25.0% 14 25.0% 43 46.7% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % N0. % N0. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 7 100.0% 6 54.5% 2 11.8% 0 0.0% 15 41.7% 13 23.2% 13 23.2% 28 30.4% D 9:30 5 71.4% 9 81.8% 1 5.9% 1 100.0% 16 44.4% 10 17.9% 10 17.9% 26 28.3% 10:00 8 114.3% 9 81.8% 3 17.6% 0 0.0% 20 55.6% 14 25.0% 14 25.0% 34 37.0% 10:30 9 128.6% 9 81.8% 4 23.5% 1 100.0% 23 63.9% 19 33.9% 19 33.9% 42 45.7% 11:00 9 128.6% 9 81.8% 5 29.4% 3 300.0% 26 72.2% 20 35.7% 20 35.7% 46 50.0% 11:30 a.m. 9 128.6% 9 81.8% 4 23.5% 4 400.0% 26 72.2% 21 37.5% 21 37.5% 47 51.1% NOON 10 142.9% 8 72.7% 6 35.3% 4 400.0% 28 77.8% 23 41.1% 23 41.1% 51 55.4% Z 12:30 p.m. 8 114.3% 9 81.8% 6 35.3% 5 500.0% 28 77.8% 21 37.5% 21 37.5% 49 53.3% 1:00 10 142.9% 9 81.8% 6 35.3% 6 600.0% 31 86.1% 25 44.6% 25 44.6% 56 60.9% m 1:30 11 157.1% 9 81.8% 5 29.4% 5 500.0% 30 83.3% 24 42.9% 24 42.9% 54 58.7% z 2:00 9 128.6% 8 72.7% 5 29.4% 6 600.0% 28 77.8% 20 35.7% 20 35.7% 48 52.2% 2:30 9 128.6% 8 72.7% 7 41.2% 5 500.0% 29 80.6% 19 33.9% 19 33.9% 48 52.2% 3:00 7 100.0% 7 63.6% 12 70.6% 5 500.0% 31 86.1% 26 46.4% 26 46.4% 57 62.0% z 3:30 8 114.3% 10 90.9% 16 94.1% 8 800.0% 42 116.77 21 37.5% 21 37.5% 63 68.5% 4:00 8 114.3% 6 54.5% 17 100.0% 7 700.0% 38 105.6% 20 35.7% 20 35.7% 58 63.0% 4:30 7 100.0% 8 72.7% 15 88.2% 8 800.0% 38 105.6% 22 39.3% 22 39.3% 60 65.2% 5:00 6 85.7% 9 81.8% 10 58.8% 8 800.0% 33 91.7% 25 44.6% 25 44.6% 58 63.0% 5:30 5 . 71.4% 8 72.7% 10 58.8% 6 600.0% 29 80.6% 23 41.1% 23 41.1% 52 56.5% 6:00 p.m. 6 85.7% 7 63.6X 8 47.1% 4 400.0% 25 69.4% 19 33.9% 19 33.9% 44 47.8% a TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK B GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners eaa=aazazaaaazsaszazzzzzzzaaaaa=azaaacaaaazaaaaaaaaa=acaa___a-a_aea----a=zzaaaa-�_aa_a-_---��_�_==ez=z=zzaaazazzzzaazaaeazzazzaazza=aaza------zz==z PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET MAIN WALNUT 2ND PCH TOTAL 1 2 3 4 70TAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES . 13 10 9 NP 32 300 300 332 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % FRI, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 12 92.3% 2 20.0% 2 22.2% 16 50.0% 12 4.0% 12 4.0% 28 8.4% 9:30 12 92.3% 2 20.0% 2 22.2% 16 50.0% 13 4.3% 13 4.3% 29 8.7% 10:00 12 92.3% 2 20.0% 1 11.1% 15 46.9% 12 4.0% 12 4.0% 27 8.1% 10:30 12 92.3% 2 20.0% 1 11.1% 15 46.9% 25 8.3% 25 8.3% 40 12.0% 11:00 12 92.3% '2 20.0% 1 11.1% 15 46.9% 25 8.3% 25 8.3% 40 12.0% 11:30 a.m. 12 92.3% 2 20.0% 2 22.2% 16 50.0% 25 8.3% 25 8.3% 41 12.3% NOON 12 92.3% 7 70.0% 3 33.3% 22 68.8% 29 9.7% 29 9.7% 51 15.4% 12:30 p.m. 12 92.3% 8 80.0% 1 11.1% 21 65.6% 38 12.7% 38 12.7% 59 17.8% 1:00 12 92.3% 7 70.0% 2 22.2% 21 65.6% 35 11.7% 35 11.7% 56 16.9% 1:30 12 92.3% 9 90.0% 7 77.8% 28 87.5% 37 12.3% 37 12.3% 65 19.6% 2:00 12 92.3% 11 110.0% 8 88.9% 31 96.9% 39 13.0% 39 13.0% 70 21.1% 2:30 12 92.3% 13 130.0% 8 88.9% 33 103.1% 42 14.0% 42 14.0% 75 22.6% 3:00 12 92.3% 10 100.0% 6 66.7% 28 87.5% 51 17.0% 51 17.0% 79 23.8% 3:30 12 92.3% 12 120.0% 7 77.8% 31 96.9% 49 16.3% 49 16.3% 80 24.1% 4:00 12 92.3% 10 100.0% 6 66.7% 28 87.5% 52 17.3% 52 17.3% 80 24.1% 4:30 12 92.3% 12 120.0% 7 77.8% 31 96.9% 55 18.3% 55 18.3% 86 25.9% 5:00 12 92.3% 13 130.0% 8 88.9% 33 103.1% 54 18.0% 54 18.0% 87 26.2% 5:30 12 92.3% 8 80.0% 9 100.0% 29 90.6% 50 16.7% 50 16.7% 79 23.8% 6:00 p.m. 12 92.3% 12 120.0% 7 77.8% 31 96.9% 47 15.7% 47 15.7% 78 23.5% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 12 92.3% 4 40.0% 5 55.6% 21 65.6% 12 4.0% 12 4.0% 33 9.9% 9:30 12 92.3% 5 50.0% 6 66.7% 23 71.9% 15 5.0% 15 5.0% 38 11.4% 10:00 12 92.3% 8 80.0% 7 77.8% 27 84.4% 17 5.7% 17 5.7% 44 13.3% D 10:30 11 84.6% 9 90.0% 8 88.9% 28 87.5% 18 6.0% 18 6.0% 46 13.9% 11:00 12 92.3% 11 110.0% 9 100.0% 32 100.0% 18 6.0% 18 6.0% 50 15.1% 11:30 a.m. 12 92.3% 11 110.0% 9 100.0% 32 100.0% 15 5.0% 15 5.0% 47 14.2X NOON 12 92.3% 8 80.0% 9 100.0% 29 90.6% 26 8.77 26 8.7% 55 16.6% 12:30 p.m. 12 92.3% 8 80.0% 9 100.0% 29 90.6% 31 10.3% 31 10.3% 60 18.1% rn 1:00 12 92.3% 7 70.0% 9 100.0% 28 87.5% 35 11.77. 35 11.7% 63 19.0% Z 1:30 11 84.6% 9 90.0% 9 100.0% 29 90.6% 39 13.0% 39 13.0% 68 20.5% 2:00 12 92.3% 11 110.0% 9 100.0% 32 100.0% 46 15.3% 46 15.3% 78 23.5% 2:30 10 76.9% 10 100.0% 8 88.9% 28 87.5% 49 16.3% 49 16.3% 77 23.2% z 3:00 12 92.3% 7 70.0% 7 77.8% 26 81.3% 52 17.3% 52 17.3% 78 23.5% O 3:30 12 92.3% 11 110.0% 9 100.0% 32 100.0% 59 19.7Y. 59 19.7% 91 27.4% 4:00 12 92.3% 12 120.0% 7 77.8% 31 96.9% 60 20.0% 60 20.0% 91 27.4% 4:30 12 92.3% 10 100.0% 8 88.9% 30 93.8% 65 21.7Y. 65 21.7% 95 28.6% 5:00 10 76.9% 9 90.0% 8 88.9% 27 84.4% 72 24.0% 72 24.0% 99 29.8% 5:30 11' 84.6% 10 100.0% 6 66.7% 27 84.4% 60 20.0% 60 20.0% 87 26.2% 6:00 p.m. 12 92.3% 8 80.0% 9 100.0% 29 90.6% 51 17.0% 51 17.0% 80 24:1% SABLE A-A EXISTING PARKING BLOCK C 1�, GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners x xaxazxxxzxaxaxxxxxaxxzxxzaaaaao=aazxxxazxxaxxzxxeaxaxxxzzxx==axxx_xzxxxx xxxxxzaz=a=axzaaxzxxxxxxxxzxzzzzxaxxxxxxzzx==zaxxxxxxxxzzx=xxx-_=xcx=xzzxz PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET 5TH OLIVE MAIN WALNUT TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES ' 18 8 8 8 42 6 6 48 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % FR1, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 3 16.7% 3 37.5% 5 62.5% 7 87.5% 18 42.9% 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 23 47.9% 9:30 5 27.8% 4 50.0% 5 62.5% 7 87.5% 21 50.0% 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 26 54.2% 10:00 5 27.8% 4 50.0% 7 87.5% 7 87.5% 23 54.8% 6 100.0% 6 100.0% 29 60.4% 10:30 4 22.2% 4 50.0% 6 75.0% 7 87.5% 21 50.0% 7 116.7% 7 116.7% 28 58.3% 11:00 4 22.2%. •3 37.5% 7 87.5% 8 100.0% 22 52.4% 7 116.7% 7 116.7% 29 60.4% 11:30 a.m. 3 16.71A 5 62.5% 7 87.5% 8 100.0% 23 54.8% 6 100.0% 6 100.0% 29 60.4% NOON 4 22.2% 5 62.5% 6 75.0% 7 87.5% 22 52.4% 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 27 56.3% 12:30 p.m. 5 27.8% 4 50.0% 6 75.0% 7 87.5% 22 52.4% 7 116.7% 7 116.7% 29 60.4% 1:00 4 22.2% 4 50.0% 5 62.5% 7 87.5% 20 47.6% 7 116.7% 7 116.7% 27 56.3% 1:30 4 22.2% 4 50.0% 5 62.5% 6 75.0% 19 45.2% 4 66.7% 4 66.7% 23 47.9% 2:00 5 27.8% 3 37.5% 5 62.5% 7 87.5% 20 47.6% 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 25 52.1% 2:30 5 27.8% 3 37.5% 6 75.0% 7 87.5% 21 50.0% 7 116.7% 7 116.7% 28 58.3% 3:00 5 27.8% 5 62.5% 5 62.5% 7 87.5% 22 52.4% 7 116.7% 7 116.7% 29 60.4% 3:30 6 33.3% 6 75.0% 5 62.5% 8 100.0% 25 59.5% 7 116.7% 7 116.7% 32 66.7% 4:00 6 33.3% 6 75.0% 4 50.0% 8 100.0% 24 57.1% 6 100.0% 6 100.0% 30 62.5% 4:30 5 27.8% 4 50.0% 4 50.0% 7 87.5% 20 47.6% 6 100.0% 6 100.0% 26 54.2% 5:00 4 22.2% 3 37.5% 3 37.5% 7 87.5% 17 40.5% 7 116.7/. 7 116.7% 24 50.0% 5:30 4 22.2% 3 37.5% 4 50.0% 6 75.0% 17 40.5% 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 22 45.8% 6:00 p.m. 4 22.2% 3 37.5% 4 50.0% 6 75.0% 17 40.5X 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 22 45.8% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % N0. % NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY D 9:00 a.m. 3 16.71 5 62.5% 5 62.5% 7 87.5% 20 47.6% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 23 47.9% 9:30 6 33.3% 3 37.5% 7 87.5% 7 87.5% 23 54.8% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 26 54.2% 10:00 6 33.3% 4 50.0% 7 87.5% 7 87.5% 24 57.1% 4 66.7% 4 66.7% 28 58.3% D 10:30 6 33.3% 5 62.5% 8 100.0% 8 100.0% 27 64.3% 4 66.7% 4 66.7% 31 64.6% 11:00 5 27.8% 7 87.5% 7 87.5% 7 87.5% 26 61.9% 6 100.0% 6 100.0% 32 66.7% i 11:30 a.m. 4 22.2% 4 50.0% 8 100.0% 7 87.5% 23 54.8% 6 100.0% 6 100.0% 29 60.4% NOON 4 22.2X 4 50.0% 5 62.5% 8 100.0% 21 50.0% 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 26 54.2% 12:30 p.m. 4 22.2% 3 37.5% 8 100.0% 7 87.5% 22 52.4% 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 27 56.3% m 1:00 3 16.7% 4 50.0% 7 87.5% 7 87.5% 21 50.0% 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 26 54.2% Z 1:30 4 22.2% 4 50.0% 7 87.5% 7 87.5% 22 52.4% 4 66.7% 4 66.7% 26 54.2% 2:00 5 27.8% 5 62.5% 9 112.5% 8 100.0% 27 64.3% 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 32 66.7% 2:30 5 27.8% 5 62.5% 8 100.0% 7 87.5% 25 59.5% 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 30 62.5X Z 3:00 5 27.8% 5 62.5% 8 100.0% 7 87.5% 25 59.5% 4 66.7% 4 66.7% 29 60.4% O 3:30 7 38.9% 8 100.0% 6 75.0% 7 87.5% 28 66.7% 6 100.0% 6 100.0% 34 70.8% 4:00 5 27.8% 5 62.5% 6 75.0% 5 62.5% 21 50.0% 8 133.3% 8 133.3% 29 60.4% 4:30 3 16.7% 4 50.0% 7 87.5% 6 75.0% 20 47.6% 6 100.0% 6 100.0% 26 54.2% 5:00 2 11.1% 4 50.0% 7 87.5% 7 87.5% 20 47.6% 5 83.3% 5 83.3% 25 52.1% N 5:30 3 16.7% 4 50.0% 8 100.0% 7 87.5% 22 52.4% 4 66.7% 4 66.7% 26 54.2% 6:00 p.m. 4 22.2% 6 75.0% 8 100.0% 8 100.0% 26 61.9% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 28 583% i , TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK D GREER E CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners ae=e=ae==eaeeaasa=saaaavaaaa=sac==ae=aa=asaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa=aaaa=a=aaae===aaaa====agaaaav=a==sec=a=aaaaa======ecaa=ease=a=avaea=aa==ae==ev==a PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET MAIN OLIVE 3RD WALNUT TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES . 16 6 11 6 39 830 830 869 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % FRI, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 13 81.3% 4 66.7% 3 27.3% 0 0.0% 20 51.3% 26 3.1% 26 3.1% 46 5.3% 9:30 12 75.0% 3 50.0% 3 27.3% 0 0.0% 18 46.2% 28 3.4% 28 3.4% 46 5.3% 10:00 12 75.0% 3 50.0% 4 36.4% 1 16.7% 20 51.3% 36 4.3% 36 4.3% 56 6.4% 10:30 14 87.5% 4 66.7% 5 45.5% 1 16.7% 24 61.5% 38 4.6% 38 4.6% 62 7.1% 11:00 14 87.5% 5 83.3% 3 27.3% 2 33.3% 24 61.5% 41 4.9% 41 4.9% 65 7.5% 11:30 a.m. 16 100.0% 3 50.0% 4 36.4% 0 0.0% 23 59.0% 46 5.5% 46 5.5% 69 7.9% NOON 15 93.8% 5 83.3% 3 27.3% 2 33.3% 25 64.1% 58 7.0% 58 7.0% 83 9.6% 12:30 p.m. 16 100.0% 5 83.3% 5 45.5% 1 16.7% 27 69.2% 60 7.2% 60 7.2% 87 10.0% 1:00 16 100.0% 4 66.7% 5 45.5% 1 16.7% 26 66.7% 62 7.5% 62 7.5% 88 10.1% 1:30 16 100.0% 6 100.0% 4 36.4% 3 50.0%. 29 74.4% 70 8.4% 70 8.4% 99 11.4% 2:00 15 93.8% 7 116.7% 6 54.5% 4 66.7% 32 82.1% 78 9.4% 78 9.4% 110 12.7Y. 2:30 14 87.5% 6 100.0% 7 63.6% 4 66.7% 31 79.5% 80 9.6% 80 9.6% 111 12.8% 3:00 15 93.8Y. 6 100.0% 6 54.5% 5 83.3% 32 82.1% 84 10.1% 84 10.1% 116 13.3% 3:30 13 81.3% 4 66.7% 8 72.7% 3 50.0% 28 71.8% 91 11.0% 91 11.0% 119 13.7% 4:00 14 87.5% 5 83.3% 6 54.5% 4 66.7% 29 74.4% 98 11.8% 98 11.8% 127 14.6% 4:30 14 87.5% 5 83.3% 7 63.6% 4 66.7% 30 76.9% 114 13.7% 114 13.7% 144 16.6% 5:00 16 100.0% 4 66.7% 8 72.7% 6 100.0% 34 87.2% 122 14.7% 122 14.7% 156 18.0% 5:30 15 93.8% 6 100.0% 9 61.8% 6 100.0% 36 92.3% 132 15.9% 132 15.9% 168 19.3% 6:00 p.m. 15 93.8% 6 100.0% 9 81.8% 5 83.3% 35 89.7% 138 16.6% 138 16.6% 173 19.9% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 12 75.0% 3 50.0% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 17 43.6% 40 4.8% 40 4.8% 57 6.6% 9:30 13 81.3% 1 16.7% 4 36.4% 1 16.7% 19 48.7% 42 5.1% 42 5.1% 61 7.0% D 10:00 12 75.0% 3 50.0% 5 45.5% 1 16.7% 21 53.8% 43 5.2% 43 5.2% 64 7.4% 10:30 13 81.3% 3 50.0% 4 36.4% 1 16.7% 21 53.8% 47 5.77 47 5.7% 68 7.8% 11:00 13 81.3% 1 16.7% 4 36.4% 0 0.0% 18 46.2% 51 6.1% 51 6.1% 69 7.9% D 11:30 a.m. 14 87.5% 3 50.0% 3 27.3% 0 0.0% 20 51.3% 50 6.0% 50 6.0% 70 8.1% NOON 14 87.5% 5 83.3% 3 27.3% 1 16.7% 23 59.0% 52 6.3% 52 6.3% 75 8.6% = 12:30 p.m. 13 81.3% 5 83.3% 4 36.4% 2 33.3% 24 61.5% 94 11.3% 94 11.3% 118 13.6% 1:00 12 75.0% 6 100.0% 3 27.3% 2 33.3% 23 59.0% 135 16.3% 135 16.3% 158 18.2% 1:30 13 81.3% 7 116.7% 4 36.4% 2 33.3% 26 66.7% 157 18.9% 157 18.9% 183 21.1% n 2:00 16 100.0% 4 66.7% 8 72.7X 4 66.7% 32 82.1% 163 19.6% 163 19.6% 195 22.4% Z 2:30 14 87.5% 3 50.0% 7 63.6% 4 66.7% 28 71.8% 164 19.8% 164 19.8% 192 22.1% 3:00 13 81.3% 4 66.7% 7 63.6% 3 50.0% 27 69.2% 165 19.9% 165 19.9% 192 22.1% 3:30 15 93.8% 3 50.0% 6 54.5% 1 16.7% 25 64.1% 168 20.2% 168 20.2% 193 22.2% z 4:00 15 93.8% 5 83.3% 4 36.4% 1 16.7% 25 64.1% 193 23.3% 193 23.3% 218 25.1% O 4:30 16 100.0% 5 83.3% 5 45.5% 2 33.3% 28 71.8% 187 22.5% 187 22.5% 215 24.7% 5:00 16 100.0% 5 83.3% 6 54.5% 4 66.7% 31 79.5% 196 23.6% 196 23.6% 227 26.1% 5:30 16,100.0% 6 100.0% 8 72.7% 4 66.7% 34 87.2% 214 25.8% 214 25.8% 248. 28.5% Q 6:00 p.m. 16 100.0% 6 100.0% 10 90.9% 6 100.0% 38 97.4% 232 28.0% 232 28.0% 270 31.1% 46 TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK E \, GREER 6 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH �. Engineers and Planners c acc=zcaaaz====aaacacezazzaaaza===aaa==caaczczzzz�aaaa=azacccccasa=zz====aczvcz==zee.zaczczz==c==c=a==accvv===v=zazz=====c=czcz=aa=acacac==ca=v=a== PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET 5TH ORANGE MAIN OLIVE TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES . 15 0 22 7 44 10 33 50 41 134 178 --------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. X FRI, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY . 9:00 a.m. 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 4 57.1% 4 9.1% 2 0.0% 4 12.1% 5 10.0% 14 34.1% 25 18.7% 29 16.3% 9:30 1 6.7% U.C. 0.0% 4 57.1% 5 11.4% 4 0.0% 4 12.1% 6 12.0% 16 39.0% 30 22.4% 35 19.7% 10:00 1 6.7% U.C. 0.0% 3 42.9% 4 9.1% 3 0.0% 8 24.2% 2 4.0% 18 43.9% 31 23.1% 35 19.7% 10:30 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 7 15.9% 3 0.0% 9 27.3% 7 14.0% 24 58.5% 43 32.1% 50 28.1% 11:00 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 6 85.7% 6 13.6% 3 0.0% 8 24.2% 7 14.0% 26 63.4% 44 32.8% 50 28.1% 11:30 a.m. 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 5 71.4% 5 11.4% 4 0.0% 8 24.2% 7 14.0% 27 65.9% 46 34.3% 51 28.7% NOON 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 7 15.9% 5 0.0% 7 21.2% 13 26.0% 30 73.2% 55 41.0% 62 34.8% 12:30 p.m. 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 8 114.3% 8 18.2% 4 0.0% 7 21.2% 13 26.0% 32 78.0% 56 41.8% 64 36.0% 1:00 1 6.7/- U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 8 18.2% 4 0.0% 7 21.2% 13 26.0% 29 70.7X 53 39.6% 61 34.3% 1:30 2 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 6 85.7% 8 18.2% 4 0.0% 6 18.2% 15 30.0% 38 92.7% 63 47.0% 71 39.9% 2:00 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 8 114.3% 8 18.2% 4 0.0% 7 21.2% 12 24.0% 36 87.8% 59 44.0% 67 37.6% 2:30 1 6.7% U.C. 0.0% 9 128.6% 10 22.7% 3 0.0% 6 18.2% 13 26.0% 37 90.2% 59 44.0% 69 38.8% 3:00 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 6 85.7% 6 13.6% 5 0.0% 7 21.2% 14 28.0% 33 80.5% 59 44.0% 65 36.5% 3:30 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 7 15.9% 4 0.0% 7 21.2% 11 22.0% 35 85.4% 57 42.5% 64 36.0% 4.00 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 7 15.9% 4 0.0% 8 24.2% 12 24.0% 41 100.0% 65 48.5% 72 40.4% 4:30 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 9 128.6% 9 20.5% 3 0.0% 8 24.2% 13 26.0% 41 100.0% 65 48.5X 74 41.6% 5:00 1 6.76 U.C. 0.0% 8 114.3% 9 20.5% 4 0.0% 8 24.2% 13 26.0% 39 95.1% 64 47.8% 73 41.0% 5:30 2 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 6 85.7% 8 18.2% 3 0.0% 7 21.2% 12 24.0% 37 90.2% 59 44.0% 67 37.6% 6:00 p.m. 1 6.7% U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 8 18.2% 4 0.0% 7 21.2% 10 20.0% 37 90.2% 58 43.3% 66 37.1% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. X NO. % NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. X NO. X SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY D 9:00 a.m. 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 7 15.9% 0 0.0% 6 18.2% 11 22.0% 13 31.7X 30 22.4% 37 20.8% 9:30 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 6 85.7% 6 13.6% 0 0.0% 4 12.1% 13 26.0% 16 39.0% 33 24.6% 39 21.9% 10:00 2 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 5 71.4% 7 15.9% 0 0.0% 2 6.1% 13 26.0% 21 51.2% 36 26.9% 43 24.2% A 10:30 1 6.7% U.C. 0.0% 6 55.7% 7 15.9% 0 0.0% 3 9.1% 15 30.0% 23 56.1% 41 30.6% 48 27.0% 11:00 0 0.0% U.C. 0.0% 5 71.4% 5 11.4% 0 0.0% 3 9.1% 12 24.0% 32 78.0% 47 35.1% 52 29.2% 11:30 a.m. 2 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 9 20.5% 0 0.0% 3 9.1% 13 26.0% 32 78.0% 48 35.8% 57 32.0% = NOON 2 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 6 85.7X 8 18.2% 0 0.0% 1 3.0% 13 26.0% 35 85.4% 49 36.6% 57 32.0% K 12:30 p.m. 2 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 8 114.3% 10 22.7% 0 0.0% 4 12.1% 11 22.0% 28 68.3% 43 32.1% 53 29.8% m 1:00 2 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 9 20.5% 0 0.0% 3 9.1% 9 18.0% 25 61.0% 37 27.6% 46 25.8% z 1:30 2 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 8 114.3% 10 22.7% 0 0.0% 2 6.1% 13 26.0% 32 78.0% 47 35.1% 57 32.0% z 2:00 2 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 8 114.3% 10 22.7% 0 0.0% 5 15.2X 10 20.0% 36 87.8% 51 38.1% 61 34.3% 2:30 2 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 9 128.6% 11 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 12.1% 12 24.0% 31 75.6% 47 35.1% 58 32.6% z 3:00 3 20.0% U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 10 22.7% 0 0.0% 3 9.1% 9 18.0% 27 65.9% 39 29.1% 49 27.5% 3:30 4 26.7% U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 11 25.0% 0 0.0% 5 15.2% 8 16.0% 25 61.0% 38 28.4% 49 27.5% O 4:00 3 20.0% U.C. 0.0% 6 85.7% 9 20.5% 0 0.0% 5 15.2% 7 14.0% 31 75.6% 43 32.1% 52 29.2% 4:30 3 20.0% U.C. 0.0% 8 114.3% 11 25.0% 0 0.0% 5 15.2% 10 20.0% 33 80.5% 48 35.8% 59 33.1% 5:00 3 20.0% U.C. 0.0% 7 100.0% 10 22.7X 0 0.0% 4 12.1% 8 16.0% 36 87.8% 48 35.8% 58 32.6% 5:30 2' 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 9 128.6% 11 25.0% 0 0.0% 3 9.1% 6 12.0% 29 70.7% 38 28.4% 49, 27.5% 6 6:00 p.m. 2 13.3% U.C. 0.0% 8 114.3% 10 22.7% 0 0.0% 3 9.1% 7 14.0% 33 80.5% 43 32.1% 53 29.8% TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK F GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH �•. / Engineers and Planners eaa=aaaasasaaaaaa=aaaaaaaeaaaaa===aaaaaaaasaaaaeaaasaaaeaaaaaeaaeaa=aa=aa==3=aa=aaeaaaaeaataaaaaa=aaaa=aaaava=an===a=eaaasasa=aaaaaaeaaae==oaao===a PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET MAIN ORANGE 3RD OLIVE TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES 1 17 9 11 5 42 25 25 67 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % FR1, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 6 35.3% 4 44.4% 9 81.8% 1 20.0% 20 47.6% 14 56.0% 14 56.0% 34 50.7% 9:30 3 17.6% 4 44.4% 7 63.6% 1 20.0% 15 35.7% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 26 38.8% 10:00 8 47.1% 4 44.4% 10 90.9% 5 100.0% 27 64.3% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 36 53.7% 10:30 8 47.1% 4 44.4% 10 90.9% 6 120.0% 28 66.7% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 37 55.2% 11:00 9 52.9% 4 44.4% 11 100.0% 5 100.0% 29 69.0% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 38 56.7% 11:30 a.m. 9 52.9% 4 44.4% 12 109.1% 5 100.0% 30 71.4% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 39 58.2% NOON 12 70.6% 2 22.2% 11 100.0% 10 200.0% 35 83.3% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 46 68.7% 12:30 p.m. 13 76.5%. 2 22.2% 12 109.1% 9 180.0% 36 85.7% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 47 70.1% 1:00 11 64.77. 3 33.3% 10 90.9% 7 140.0% 31 73.8% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 41 61.2% 1:30 17 100.0% 3 33.3% 10 90.9% 7 140.0% 37 88.1% 13 52.0% 13 52.0% 50 74.6% 2:00 15 88.2% 3 33.3% 9 81.8% 7 140.0% 34 81.0% 13 52.0% 13 52.0% 47 70.1% 2:30 14 82.4% 2 22.2% 9 81.8% 9 180.0% 34 81.0% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 44 65.7% 3:00 12 70.6% 3 33.3% 7 63.6% 8 160.0% 30 71.4% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 39 58.2% 3:30 13 76.5% 3 33.3% 8 72.7% 7 140.0% 31 73.8% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 42 62.7% 4:00 14 82.4% 3 33.3% 6 54.5% 7 140.0% 30 71.4% 14 56.0% 14 56.0% 44 65.7% 4:30 17 100.0%. 3 33.3% 5 45.5% 7 140.0% 32 76.2% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 43 64.2% 5:00 15 88.2%. 3 33.3% 7 63.6% 8 160.0% 33 78.6% 13 52.0% 13 52.0% 46 68.7% 5:30 14 82.4% 3 33.3% 9 81.8% 8 160.0% 34 81.0% 12 48.0% 12 48.0% 46 68.7% 6:00 p.m. 14 82.4% 2 22.2% 9 81.8% 8 160.0% 33 78.6% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 42 62.7% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKO OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 6 35.3% 3 33.3% 9 81.8% 5 100.0% 23 54.8% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 32 47.8% 9:30 5 29.4% 2 22.2% 9 81.8% 3 60.0% 19 45.2% 12 48.0% 12 48.0% 31 46.3% 10:00 3 17.6%. 2 22.2% 8 72.7% 4 80.0% 17 40.5% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 28 41.8X 10:30 8 47.1% 2 22.2% 10 90.9% 4 80.0% 24 57.1% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 35 52.2% C7 11:00 7 41.2% 3 33.3% 11 100.0% 3 60.0% 24 57.1% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 35 52.2% 11:30 a.m. 7 41.2% 3 33.3% 13 118.2% 3 60.0% 26 61.9% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 37 55.2% NOON 8 47.1% 2 22.2% 12 109.1% 2 40.0% 24 57.1% 12 48.0% 12 48.0% 36 53.7% 12 10 p.m. 7 41.2% 2 22.2% 9 81.8% 2 40.0% 20 47.6% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 30 44.8% m 1:00 8 47.1% 2 22.2% 9 81.8% 2 40.0% 21 50.0% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 30 44.8% Z 1:30 9 52.9% 2 22.2% 9 81.8% 2 40.0% 22 52.4% 8 32.0% 8 32.0% 30 44.8% ...� 2:00 6 35.3% 3 33.3% 8 72.7% 2 40.0% 19 45.2% 12 48.0% 12 48.0% 31 46.3% 2:30 4 23.5% 4 44.4% 7 63.6% 3 60.0% 18 42.9% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 27 40.3% Z 3:00 3 17.6%. 2 22.2% 6 54.5% 5 100.0% 16 38.1% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 25 37.3% Q 3:30 2 11.8% 3 33.3% 7 63.6% 3 60.0% 15 35.7% 7 28.0% 7 28.0% 22 32.8% • 4:00 3 17.6%. 3 33.3% 10 90.9% 4 80.0% 20 47.6% 8 32.0% 8 32.0% 28 41.8% 4:30 4 23.5% 3 33.3% 11 100.0% 4 80.0% 22 52.4% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 31 46.3% 5:00 3 17.6%. 3 33.3% 11 100.0% 4 80.0% 21 50.0% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 31 46.3% 5:30 2' 11.8% 3 33.3% 11 100.0% 3 60.0% 19 45.2% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 30 44.8% 6:00 p.m. 3 17.6% 3 33.3% 12 109.1% 3 60.0% 21 50.0% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 32 47.8% TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK G j GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH . Engineers and Planners aa:zzzzzaaasazazzaazzzaaazzazzaa==aczaaccaasazaaaaaaaazzszacasaaaaazzeaazazzazazcaazzaz3a�caaazzzccaa==aaazcazzaezazzzeazzzzz=aaazzzzc_azc=z=a=vzaa PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET 6TH MAIN ORANGE TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES 20 26 19 65 17 17 82 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % FR1, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 5 25.0% 7 26.9% 8 42.1% 20 30.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 20 24.4% 9:30 4 20.0% 7 26.9% 8 42.1% 19 29.2% 1 5.9% 1 5.9% 20 24.4% 10:00 4 20.0% 8 30.8% 3 15.8% 15 23.1% 3 17.6% 3 17.6% 18 22.0% 10:30 4 20.0% 12 46.2% 6 31.6% 22 33.8% 3 17.6% 3 17.6% 25 30.5% 11:00 5 25.0% 12 46.2% 6 31.6% 23 35.4% 3 17.6% 3 17.6% 26 31.7% 11:30 a.m. 5 25.0% 9 34.6% 7 36.8% 21 32.3% 3 17.6% 3 17.6% 24 29.3% NOON 7 35.0% 9 34.6% 8 42.1% 24 36.9% 3 17.6% 3 17.6% 27 32.9% 12:30 p.m. 7 35.0% 15 57.7% 8 42.1% 30 46.2% 4 23.5% 4 23.5% 34 41.5% 1:00 5 25.0% 14 53.8% 8 42.1% 27 41.5% 5 29.4% 5 29.4% 32 39.0% 1:30 3 15.0% 11 42.3% 11 57.9% 25 38.5% 3 17.6% 3 17.6% 28 34.1% 2:00 4 20.0% 12 46.2% 11 57.9Y. 27 41.5% 3 17.6% 3 17.6% 30 36.6% 2:30 4 20.0% 11 42.3% 9 47.4% 24 36.9% 6 35.3% 6 35.3% 30 36.6% 3:00 4 20.0% 16 61.5% 12 63.2% 32 49.2% 7 41.2% 7 41.2% 39 47.6% 3:30 5 25.0% 18 69.2% 11 57.9% 34 52.3% 8 47.1% 8 47.1% 42 51.2% 4:00 5 25.0% 14 53.8% 12 63.2% 31 47.7% 8 47.1% 8 47.1% 39 47.6% 4:30 3 15.0% 11 42.3% 12 63.2% 26 40.0% 8 47.1% 8 47.1% 34 41.5% 5:00 4 20.0% 14 53.8% 12 63.2% 30 46.2% 5 29.4% 5 29.4% 35 42.7% 5:30 5 25.0% 15 57.7% 6 31.6% 26 40.0% 5 29.4% 5 29.4% 31 37.8% 6:00 p.m. 4 20.0% 12 46.2% 6 31.6% 22 33.8% 8 47.1% 8 47.1% 30 36.6% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 2 10.0% 13 50.0% 12 63.2% 27 41.5% 3 17.6% 3 17.6% 30 36.6% 9:30 3 15.0% 13 50.0% 12 63.2% 28 43.1% 3 17.6% 3 17.6% 31 37.8% 10:00 3 15.0% 13 50.0% 11 57.9% 27 41.5% 3 17.6% 3 17.6% 30 36.6% 10:30 3 15.0% 13 50.0% 12 63.2% 28 43.1% 5 29.4% 5 29.4% 33 40.2% D 11:00 2 10.0% 14 53.8% 11 57.9% 27 41.5% 7 41.2% 7 41.2% 34 41.5% C7 11:30 a.m. 1 5.0% 14 53.8% 11 57.9% 26 40.0% 6 35.3% 6 35.3% 32 39.0% NOON 2 10.0% 14 53.8% 12 63.2% 28 43.1% 9 52.9% 9 52.9% 37 45.1% 12:30 p.m. 3 15.0% 12 46.2% 12 63.2% 27 41.5% 9 52.9% 9 52.9% 36 43.9% 1:00 3 15.0% 15 57.7% 12 63.2% 30 46.2% 10 58.8% 10 58.8% 40 48.8% (n 1:30 4 20.0% 9 34.6% 14 73.7% 27 41.5% 9 52.9% 9 52.9% 36 43.9% z 2:00 4 20.0% 13 50.0% 10 52.6% 27 41.5% 8 47.1% 8 47.1% 35 42.7% 2:30 4 20.0% 12 46.2% 11 57.9% 27 41.5% 8 47.1% 8 47.1% 35 42.7X 3:00 4 20.0% 15 57.7% 14 73.7% 33 50.8% 8 47.1% 8 47.1% 41 50.0% Z 3:30 4 20.0% 14 53.8% 14 73.7% 32 49.2% 9 52.9% 9 52.9% 41 50.0% 0 4:00 5 25.0% 12 46.2% 13 68.4% 30 46.2% 7 41.2% 7 41.2% 37 45.1% 4:30 8 40.0% 13 50.0% 12 63.2% 33 50.8% 7 41.2% 7 41.2% 40 48.8% 5:00 9 45.0% 11 42.3% 13 68.4% 33 50.8% 9 52.9% 9 52.9% 42 51.2% 5:30 8' 40.0% 9 34.6% 12 63.2% 29 44.6% 7 41.2% 7 41.2% 36 43.9% 6:00 p.m. 9 45.0% 11 42.3% 12 63.2% 32 49.2% 8 47.1% 8 47.1% 40 48.8% TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK N1 GREER 8 CO. DOIiNTOHN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners aaaaaaa:aaaaaaaaaaa:aaaaaaaaaaacaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa=aaaaaaaaaaaeaa=aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaasaaaaa=ascaaaaaaa PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET MAIN PECAN LAKE ORANGE TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES 13 8 23 5 49 7 7 56 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. X NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. X FR1, 2-19.93 PKD OCC PKD DCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 3 23.1% 2 25.0% 10 43.5% 4 80.0% 19 38.8% 4 57.1% 4 57.1% 23 41.1% 9:30 3 23.1% 2 25.0% 10 43.5% 4 80.0% 19 38.8% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 21 37.5% 10:00 7 53.8% 1 12.5% 10 43.5% 4 80.0% 22 44.9% 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 25 44.6% 10:30 5 38.5% 1 12.5% 10 43.5% 3 60.0% 19 38.8% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 20 35.7% 11:00 3 23.1% 'l 12.5% 10 43.5% 3 60.0% 17 34.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 17 30.4% 11:30 a.m. 9 69.2% 1 12.5% 10 43.5% 3 60.0% 23 46.9% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 25 44.6% NOON 5 38.5% 1 12.5% 10 43.5% 2 40.0% 18 36.7% 1 14.3X 1 14.3% 19 33.9% 12:30 p.m. 8 61.5% 3 37.5% 15 65.2% 3 60.0% 29 59.2% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 30 53.6% 1:00 6 46.2% 2 25.0% 8 34.8% 1 20.0% 17 34.77. 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 18 32.1% 1:30 9 69.2% 1 12.5% 7 30.4% 2 40.0% 19 38.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 19 33.9% 2:00 9 69.2% 1 12.5% 10 43.5% 1 20.0% 21 42.9% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 23 41.1% 2:30 10 76.9% 2 25.0% 12 52.2% 1 20.0% 25 51.0% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 26 46.4% 3:00 7 53.8% 2 25.0% 12 5Z.2X 1 20.0% 22 44.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 22 39.3% 3:30 9 69.2% 2 25.0% 10 43.5% 1 20.0% 22 44.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 22 39.3% 4:00 9 69.2% 1 12.5% 11 47.8% 1 20.0% 22 44.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 22 39.3% 4:30 7 53.8% 1 12.5% 11 47.8% 1 20.0% 20 40.8Y. 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 23 41.1% 5:00 6 46.2% 1 12.5% 11 47.8% 2 40.0% 20 40.8% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 22 39.3% 5:30 7 53.8% 1 12.5% 10 43.5% 2 40.0% 20 40.8% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 22 39.3% 6:00 p.m. 6 46.2% 2 25.0% 11 47.8% 2 40.0% 21 42.9% 4 57.1% 4 57.1% 25 44.6% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. Y. SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 6 46.2% 2 25.0% 13 56.5% 2 40.0% 23 46.9% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 25 44.6% 9:30 6 46.2% 2 25.0% 13 56.5% 2 40.0% 23 46.9% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 25 44.6% D 10:00 9 69.2%. 2 25.0% 13 56.5% 3 60.0% 27 55.1% 5 71.4% 5 71.4% 32 57.1% 10:30 9 69.2% 3 37.5% 12 52.2% 3 60.0% 27 55.1% 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 30 53.6% 11:00 9 69.2% 3 37.5% 13 56.5% 3 60.0% 28 57.1% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 29 51.8% � D 11:30 a.m. 9 69.2% 4 50.0% 13 56.5% 3 60.0% 29 59.2% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 31 55.4% NOON 9 69.2% 4 50.0% 14 60.9% 3 60.0% 30 61.2% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 31 55.4% 12:30 p.m. 9 69.2% 3 37.5% 11 47.8% 3 60.0% 26 53.1% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 28 50.0% 1:00 8 61.5% 2 25.0% 15 65.2% 4 80.0% 29 59.2% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 31 55.4% 1:30 8 61.5% 1 12.5% 15 65.2% 5 100.OX 29 59.2% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 30 53.6% m 2:00 8 61.5% 2 25.0% 11 47.8% 4 80.OX 25 51.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 25 44.6% z 2:30 6 46.2% 2 25.0% 9 39.1% 4 80.0% 21 42.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 21 37.5% 3:00 6 46.2% 1 12.5% 10 43.5% 4 80.0% 21 42.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 21 37.5% 3:30 6 46.2% 4 50.0% 14 60.9% 4 80.0% 28 57.1% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 30 53.6% Z 4:00 6 46.2% 4 50.0% 13 56.5% 4 60.0% 27 55.1X 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 28 50.0% O 4:30 6 46.2% 1 12.5% 12 52.2% 5 100.0% 24 49.0% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 26 46.4% 5:00 6 46.2% 2 25.0% 14 60.9% 5 100.0% 27 55.1% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 28 50.0% 5:30 6 46.2% 1 12.5% 11 47.8% 4 80.0% 22 44.9% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 23 41.1% 6:00 p.m. 6 46.2% 1 12.5% 12 52.2% 4 80.0% 23 46.9% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 24 42.9% TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK H2 �� j' GREER 8 CO. 9OWNIOWN HUNIINGION BEACH `. Engineers and PLanners e aaaaaaaaaasaaaaa==saaeaveae=a.a.aaae=eeaeeaa.sa--s=-a-a----aacaae=.a...vve=eea=_ens _� a3ep�=vaev_----��__________aces----a.__a_______3___________ PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET MAIN 6TH LAKE PECAN TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES 2 4 4 8 18 12 10 32 54 72 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % N0. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X FRI, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 1 50.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 50.0% 6 33.3% 6 50.0% 3 30.0% 5 15.6% 14 25.9% 20 27.8% 9:30 1 50.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 6 75.0% 8 44.4% 7 58.3% 3 30.OX 6 18.8% 16 29.6% 24 33.3% 10:00 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 7 87.5% 8 44.4% 6 50.0% 3 30.0% 6 18.8% 15 27.8% 23 31.9% 10:30 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 6 75.0% 7 38.9% 6 50.0% 3 30.0% 6 18.8% 15 27.8% 22 30.6% 11:00 1 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 5 62.5% 8 44.4% 5 41.7% 4 40.0% 5 15.6% 14 25.9% 22 30.6% 11:30 a.m. 1 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 5 62.5% 8 44.4% 5 41.7% 3 30.0% 6 18.8% 14 25.9% 22 30.6% NOON 1 50.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 6 75.0% 8 44.4% 5 41.7% 5 50.0% 7 21.9% 17 31.5% 25 34.74 12:30 p.m. 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 6 75.0% 8 44.4% 6 50.0% 3 30.0% 6 18.8% 15 27.8% 23 31.9% 1:00 1 50.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 6 75.0% 8 44.4% 6 50.0% 5 50.0% 6 18.8% 17 31.5% 25 34.7% 1:30 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 7 87.5% 8 44.4% 5 41.7% 3 30.0% 5 15.6% 13 24.1% 21 29.2% 2.00 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 7 87.5% 9 50.0% 4 33.3% 5 50.0% 5 15.6% 14 25.9% 23 31.9% 2:30 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 6 75.0% 8 44.4% 5 41.7% 4 40.0% 3 9.4% 12 22.2% 20 27.8% 3:00 1 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 6 75.0% 11 61.1% 6 50.0% 4 40.0% 4 12.5% 14 25.9% 25 34.7% 3:30 1 50.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 6 75.0% 10 55.6% 3 25.0% 2 20.0% 7 21.9X 12 22.2% 22 30.6% 4:00 2 100.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 6 75.OZ 11 61.1% 4 33.3% 2 20.0% 7 21.9% 13 24.1X 24 33.3% 4:30 1 50.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 4 50.0% 9 50.0% 5 41.7% 2 20.0% 6 18.8% 13 24.1% 22 30.6% 5:00 1 50.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 5 62.5% 10 55.6% 4 33.3% 2 20.0% 6 18.8% 12 22.2% 22 30.6X 5:30 1 50.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 6 75.0% 11 61.1% 6 50.0% 2 20.0% 9 28.1% 17 31.5% 28 38.9% 6:00 p.m. 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 3 75.0% 7 87.5% 12 66.7% 6 50.0% 1 10.0% 9 28.1% 16 29.6% 28 38.9% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. % NO. X N0. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY D 9:00 a.m. 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 6 75.0% 7 38.9% 4 33.3% 2 20.0% 10 31.3% 16 29.6% 23 31.9% 9:30 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 6 75.0% 7 38.9% 3 25.0% 2 20.0% 11 34.4% 16 29.6% 23 31.9% 10:00 1 50.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 6 75.0% 8 44.4% 5 41.77 3 30.0% 10 31.3% 18 33.3% 26 36.1X A 10:30 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 6 75.OX 7 38.9% 6 50.0% 3 30.0% 8 25.0% 17 31.5% 24 33.3% 11:00 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 6 75.0% 7 38.9% 6 50.0% 2 20.0% 8 25.0% 16 29.6% 23 31.9% 11:30 a.m. 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 6 75.0% 7 38.9% 7 58.3% 3 30.0% 8 25.0% 18 33.3% 25 34.7% NOON 1 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 5 62.5% 10 55.6% 7 58.3% 4 40.0% 10 31.3% 21 38.9% 31 43.1% 12:30 p.m. 1 50.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 6 75.0% 10 55.6% 7 58.3% 4 40.0% 9 28.1% 20 37.0% 30 41.7X m 1:00 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 6 75.0% 10 55.6% 8 66.7% 4 40.0% 7 21.9% 19 35.2% 29 40.3% 1:30 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 5 62.5% 7 38.9% 6 50.0% 3 30.0% 8 25.0% 17 31.5% 24 33.3% z 2:00 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 6 75.0% 10 55.6% 8 66.7% 4 40.0% 10 31.3% 22 40.7% 32 44.4% 2:30 1 50.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 5 62.5% 9 50.0% 8 66.7Y. 3 30.0% 9 28.1% 20 37.0% 29 40.3X Z 3:00 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 6 75.0% 11 61.1% 8 66.7Y. 4 40.0% 10 31.3% 22 40.7% 33 45.8% 3:30 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 5 62.5% 9 50.0% 7 58.3% 4 40.0% 10 31.3% 21 38.9% 30 41.7% Q 4:00 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 5 62.5% 9 50.0% 6 50.0% 4 40.0% 10 31.3% 20 37.0% 29 40.3% r 4:30 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 5 62.5% 10 55.6% 6 50.0% 4 40.0% 11 34.4% 21 38.9% 31 43.1% r� 5:00 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 5 125.0% 6 75.0% 12 66.7% 8 66.7% 3 30.OX 9 28.1% 20 37.0% 32 44.4% 5:30 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 5 62.5% 10 55.6% 8 66.7% 3 30.OX 20 62.5% 31 57.4% 41 56.9% 6:00 p.m. 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 5 62.5% 9 50.0% 8 66.7% 3 30.0% 21 65.6% 32 59.3% 41 56.9% ,v ' �y TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK 1 GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners aaa=aaaaasaccaaaaaaaaaacacaaaaceaaaaaaaaaaaaaacaaaa:aaaaaoaaaaaaaaaeaaaaeaaeaaaaaaaagaaaeaa6aaaaeaaaaaaasaaaaaaaacaaacacaaac=aaaaaaavaaa=❑eacaaaaaa PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET MAIN ACACIA LAKE 6TH TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES 3 8 3 7 21 25 25 46 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X FR1, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 1 33.3% 2 25.0% 1 33.3% 3 42.9% 7 33.3% 13 52.0% 13 52.0% 20 43.5% 9:30 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 1 33.3% 1 14.3% 3 14.3% 12 48.0% 12 48.0% 15 32.6% 10:00 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 1 14.3% 3 14.3% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 13 28.3% 10:30 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 2 28.6% 3 14.3% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 12 26.1% 11:00 1 33.3% •2 25.0% 1 33.3% 4 57.1% 8 38.1% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 17 37.0% 11:30 a.m. 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 1 33.3% 4 57.1% 6 28.6% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 16 34.8% NOON 3 100.0% 2 25.07. 0 0.0% 2 28.6% 7 33.3% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 18 39.1% 12:30 p.m. 2 66.7% 2 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 57.1% 8 38.1% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 19 41.3% 1:00 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 5 71.4% 6 28.6% 12 48.0% 12 48.0% 18 39.1% 1:30 1 33.3% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 3 42.9% 5 23.8% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 14 30.4% 2:00 1 33.3% 1 12.5% 1 33.3% 4 57.1% 7 33.3% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 16 34.8% 2:30 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 0 0.0% 2 28.6% 4 19.0% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 13 28.3% 3:00 2 66.7'/. 1 12.5% 1 33.3% 4 57.1% 8 38.1% 9 36.0% 9 36.0% 17 37.0% 3:30 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 1 33.3% 4 57.1% 6 26.6% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 16 34.8% 4:00 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 1 33.3% 2 28.6% 5 23.8% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 15 32.6% 4:30 1 33.3% 2 25.0% 1 33.3% 2 28.6% 6 28.6% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 16 34.8% 5:00 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 1 33.3% 4 57.1% 7 33.3% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 17 37.0% 5:30 0 0.0% 3 37.5% 2 66.7% 5 71.4% 10 47.6% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 21 45.7% 6:00 p.m. 1 33.3% 1 12.5% 2 66.7% 5 71.4% 9 42.9% 12 48.0% 12 48.0% 21 45.7% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % N0. % SAT. 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY D 9:00 a.m. 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 2 66.7% 4 57.1% 8' 38.1% 19 76.0% 19 76.0% 27 58.7% 9:30 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 2 66.7% 5 71.4% 9 42.9% 20 80.0% 20 80.0% 29 63.0% 10:00 1 33.3% 3 37.5% 2 66.7% 4 57.1% 10 47.6% 18 72.0% 18 72.0% 28 60.9% D 10:30 0 0.0% 3 37.5% 2 66.7% 3 42.9% 8 38.1% 17 68.0% 17 68.0% 25 54.3% 11:00 2 66.7Y. 3 37.5% 2 66.7% 4 57.1% 11 52.4% 17 68.0% 17 68.0% 28 60.9% 11:30 a.m. 1 33.3% 4 50.0% 2 66.7% 4 57.1% 11 52.4% 21 84.0% 21 84.0% 32 69.6% NOON 0 0.0% 3 37.5% 1 33.3% 2 28.6% 6 28.6% 18 72.0% 18 72.0% 24 52.2% 12:30 p.m. 1 33.3% 2 25.0% 2 66.7% 3 42.9% 8 38.1% 15 60.0% 15 60.0% 23 50.0% m 1:00 1 33.3% 3 37.5% 1 33.3% 2 28.6% 7 33.3% 16 64.0% 16 64.0% 23 50.0% Z 1:30 2 66.77 2 25.0% 2 66.7% 4 57.1% 10 47.6% 18 72.0% 18 72.0% 28 60.9% 2:00 2 66.77. 4 50.0% 2 66.7% 2 28.6% 10 47.6% 19 76.0% 19 76.0X 29 63.0% 2:30 1 33.3% 3 37.5% 2 66.7% 3 42.9% 9 42.9% 20 80.0% 20 80.0% 29 63.0% 7.L. 3:00 0 0.0% 3 37.5% 2 66.7% 3 42.9% 8 38.1% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 19 41.3% 3:30 2 66.77 3 37.5% 2 66.7% 4 57.1% 11 52.4% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 22 47.8% 4:00 2 66.7X 2 25.0% 2 66.7% 3 42.9% 9 42.9% 12 48.0% 12 48.0% 21 45.7% r 4:30 3 100.0% 3 37.5% 1 33.3% 4 57.1% 11 52.4% 11 44.0% 11 44.0% 22 47.8% .+� 5:00 0 0.0% 4 50.0% 3 100.0% 6 85.7% 13 61.9% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 23 50.0% 5:30 1. 33.3% 3 37.5% 0 0.0% 4 57.1% 8 38.1% 13 52.0% 13 52.0% 21 45.7% 6:00 p.m. 0 0.0% 3 37.5% 0 0.0% 4 57.1% 7 33.3X 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 11 37.0% \ TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK 81 \ GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners ======aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:aaaa=aaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaasaaaaaaaaaavaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Jaesaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaa==c==aaaaaava=aaaaaaa=aaacaa=v=ac=== PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET 2ND WALNUT 1ST PCH TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES 19 10 NP 3 22 22 -----------•----------------------------- -- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % N0. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % FRI, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 4 44.4% 2 20.0% 0 0.0% 6 27.3% 6 27.3% 9:30 4 44.4% 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 7 31.8% 7 31.8% 10:00 6 66.77 4 40.0% 0 0.0% 10 45.5% 10 45.5% 10:30 5 55.6% 4 . 40.0% 0 0.0% 9 40.9% 9 40.9% 11:00 5 55.6% •4 40.0% 0 0.0% 9 40.9% 9 40.9% 11:30 a.m. 4 44.4% 4 40.OX 1 33.3% 9 40.9% 9 40.9% NOON 6 66.7% 5 50.0% 2 66.7% 13 59.1% 13 59.1% 12:30 p.m. 8 88.9% 6 60.0% 0 0.0% 14 63.6% 14 63.6% 1:00 8 88.9% 6 60.0% 1 33.3X 15 68.2% 15 68.2% 1:30 9 100.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0% 11 50.0% 11 50.0% 2:00 9 100.0% 5 50.0% 0 0.0% 14 63.6% 14 63.6% 2:30 9 100.0% 6 60.0% 0 0.0% 15 68.2% 15 68.2% 3:00 8 88.9% 5 50.0% 1 33.3% 14 63.6% 14 63.6% 3:30 9 100.0% 6 60.0% 0 0.0% 15 68.2% 15 68.2% 4:00 9 100.0% 5 50.0% 1 33.3% 15 68.2% 15 68.2% 4:30 9 100.0% 4 40.0% 1 33.3% 14 63.6% 14 63.6% 5:00 9 100.0% 3 30.0% 1 33.3% 13 59J% 13 59.1% 5:30 8 88.9% 5 50.0% 0 0.0% 13 59.1% 13 59.1% 6:00 p.m. 8 88.9% 2 20.0% 1 33.3% 11 50.0% 11 50.0% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % N0. % NO. % NO. % NO. X N0. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 9 100.0% 6 60.0% 0 0.0% 15 68.2% 15 68.2% D 9:30 9 100.0% 6 60.0% 1 33.3% 16 72.7% 16 72.7% 10:00 9 100.0% 6 60.0% 1 33.3% 16 72.7% 16 72.7% 10:30 8 88.9% 5 50.0% 0 0.0% 13 59.1% 13 59.1% D 11:00 9 100.0% 6 60.0% 1 33.3% 16 72.7% 16 72.7% 11:30 a.m. 9 100.0% 4 40.0% 1 33.3% 14 63.6% 14 63.6% NOON 9 100.0%. 4 40.0% 1 33.3% 14 63.6% 14 63.6% 12:30 p.m. 9 100.0% 4 40.0% 0 0.0% 13 59.1% 13 59.1% 1:00 9 100.0% 4 40.0% 0 0.0% 13 59.1% 13 59.1% m 1:30 9 100.0% 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 12 54.5% 12 54.5% 2:00 9 100.0% 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 12 54.5% 12 54.5% Z 2:30 9 100.0% 4 40.0% 0 0.0% 13 59.1% 13 59.1% 3:00 9 100.0% 5 50.0% 2 66.7% 16 72.7% 16 72.7% Z 3:30 9 100.0% 4 40.0% 0 0.0% 13 59.1% 13 59.1% 4:00 8 88.9% 5 50.0% 3 100.0% 16 72.7% 16 72.7% 4:30 8 88.9% 4 40.0% 3 100.0% 15 68.2% 15 68.2% 5:00 7 77.8% 5 50.0% 3 100.0% 15 68.2% 15 68.2% 5:30 6 66.7% 5 50.0% 3 100.0% 14 63.6% 14 63.6X 6:00 p.m. 9 100.0% 6 60.0% 3 100.0% 18 81.8% 18 81.8% TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK Cl GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH ' Engineers and Planners a aaaaazeaaasaaaasaeaeeaaz=aaaeaa=aaaazsaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaeezzaaaaaazazazez=aazazzzzz==azaa=aaaz=zca=czazazaaaae_eczaeazzaaza=aa=aeezaaaa=aaae=avae PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET 6TH OLIVE 5TH WALNUT TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES 113 7 17 9 46 0 46 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % FR1, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 6 46.2% 2 28.6% 6 35.3% 8 88.9% 22 47.8% 22 47.8% 9:30 6 46.2% 2 28.6% 6 35.3% 8 88.9% 22 47.8% 22 47.8% 10:00 7 53.8% 4 57.1% 5 29.4% 8 88.9% 24 52.2% 24 52.2% 10:30 6 46.2% 3 42.9% 7 41.2% 9 100.0% 25 54.3% 25 54.3% 11:00 6 46.2% 3 42.9% 8 47.1% 7 77.8% 24 52.2% 24 52.2% 11:30 a.m. 6 46.2% 3 42.9% 10 58.8% 9 100.0% 28 60.9% 28 60.9% NOON 7 53.8% 5 71.4% 11 64.7% 8 88.9% 31 67.4% 31 67.4% 12:30 p.m. 8 61.5% 4 57.1% 10 58.8% 7 77.8% 29 63.0% 29 63.0% 1:00 7 53.8% 4 57.1% 13 76.5% 8 88.9% 32 69.6% 32 69.6% 1:30 7 53.8% 3 42.9% 14 82.4% 7 77.8% 31 67.4% 31 67.4% 2:00 6 46.2% 3 42.9% 12 70.6% 7 77.8% 28 60.9% 28 60.9% 2:30 5 38.5% 5 71.4% 11 64.7% 5 55.6% 26 56.5% 26 56.5% 3:00 6 46.2% 6 85.7% 12 70.6% 6 66.7% 30 65.2% 30 65.2% 3:30 6 46.2% 5 71.4% 10 58.8% 6 66.7% 27 58.7% 27 58.7% 4:00 7 53.8% 5 71.4% 8 47.1% 5 55.6% 25 54.3% 25 54.3% 4:30 7 53.8% 3 42.9% 9 52.9% 7 77.8% 26 56.5% 26 56.5% 5:00 6 46.2% 4 57.1% 10 58.8% 5 55.6% 25 54.3% 25 54.3% 5:30 8 61.5% 3 42.9% 11 64.7% 4 44.4% 26 56.5% 26 56.5% 6:00 p.m. 8 61.5% 3 42.9% 11 64.7% 5 55.6% 27 58.7% 27 58.7% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 8 61.5% 3 42.9% 6 35.3% 9 100.0% 26 56.5% 26 56.5% 9:30 10 76.9% 3 42.9% 7 41.2% 8 88.9% 28 60.9% 28 60.9% 10:00 8 61.5% 3 42.9% 7 41.2% 8 88.9% 26 56.5% 26 56.5% 10:30 9 69.2% 4 57.1% 6 35.3% 8 88.9% 27 58.7% 27 58.7% 11:00 9 69.2% 5 71.4% 8 47.1% 7 77.8% 29 63.0% 29 63.0% 11:30 a.m. 8 61.5% 5 71.4% 10 58.8% 7 77.8% 30 65.2% 30 65.2% NOON 7 53.8% 5 71.4% 11 64.7% 7 77.8% 30 65.2% 30 65.2% 12:30 p.m. 7 53.8% 5 71.4% 12 70.6% 7 77.8% 31 67.4% 31 67.4% = 1:00 7 53.8% 4 57.1% 13 76.5% 7 77.8% 31 67.4% 31 67.4% 1:30 7 53.8% 5 71.4% 14 82.4% 7 77.8% 33 71.7% 33 71.7% 2:00 6 46.2% 6 85.7% 13 76.5% 8 88.9% 33 71.7% 33 71.7% M 2:30 6 46.2% 7 100.0% 12 70.6% 8 88.9% 33 71.7% 33 71.7% 3:00 7 53.8% 6 85.7% 12 70.6% 7 77.8% 32 69.6% 32 69.6% 3:30 7 53.8% 5 71.4% 13 76.5% 6 66.7% 31 67.4% 31 67.4% 4:00 6 46.2% 4 57.1% 11 64.7% 6 66.7% 27 58.7% 27 58.7% O 4:30 6 46.2% 3 42.9% 9 52.9% 6 66.7% 24 52.2% 24 52.2% 5:00 6 46.2% 2 28.6% 8 47.1% 7 77.8% 23 50.0% 23 50.0% 5:30 7' 53.8% 2 28.6% 10 58.8% 5 55.6% 24 52.2% 24 52.2% 1 6:00 p.m. 9 69.2% 2 28.6% 12 70.6% 5 55.6% 28 60.9% 28 60.9% IN, �{.. TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK D1 "I GREER 6 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners =aa=aaaasaaaaaa=a=aaaaaaaaaeasa==caaaaa=aacaaaaaaaeacaeaaaaa=aa--a-----aa-----ce _ aa=ca=aaa=aaaaaa_=ca------a-_--aaaaaaacaaaaaaaaae=a-----------_ PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET 3RD OLIVE 2ND WALNUT TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES 10 9 13 7 39 12 12 51 --------------------------------------------------•------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- -°---------- PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. X N0: X NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. X FR1, 2-19-93 PKD DCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 5 50.0% 4 44.4% 5 38.5% 4 57.1% 18 46.2% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 21 41.2% 9:30 6 60.0% 4 44.4% 5 38.5% 3 42.9% 18 46.2% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 21 41.2% 10:00 6 60.0% 5 55.6% 5 38.5% 3 42.9*4 19 48.7% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 21 41.2% 10:30 6 60.0% 5 55.6% 7 53.8% 4 57.1% 22 56.4% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 24 47.1% 11:00 5 50.0% 3 33.3% 6 46.2% 5 71.4% 19 48.7% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 21 41.2% 11:30 a.m. 6 60.0% 4 44.4% 6 46.2% 3 42.9% 19 48.7% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 20 39.2% NOON 6 60.0% 3 33.3% 4 30.8% 2 28.6% 15 38.5% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 18 35.3% 12:30 p.m. 6 60.0% 5 55.6% 6 46.2% 3 42.9% 20 51.3% 2 16.77. 2 16.7% 22 43.1% 1:00 7 70.0% 4 44.4% 6 46.2% 3 42.9% 20 51.3% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 23 45.1% 1:30 4 40.0% 4 44.4% 5 38.5% 3 42.9% 16 41.0% 2 16.77.. 2 16.7% 18 35.3% 2:00 5 50.0% 4 44.4% 5 38.5% 4 57.1% 18 46.2% 2 16.7X 2 16.7% 20 39.2% 2:30 5 50.0% 5 55.6% 6 46.2% 5 71.4% 21 53.8% 4 33.3% 4 33.3% 25 49.0% 3:00 6 60.0% 5 55.6% 7 53.8% 5 71.4% 23 59.0% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 25 49.0% 3:30 7 70.0% 3 33.3% 5 38.5% 4 57.1% 19 48.7% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 22 43.1% 4:00 6 60.0% 3 33.3% 4 30.8% 3 42.9% 16 41.0% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 19 37.3% 4:30 6 60.0% 4 44.4% 3 23.1X 2 28.6% 15 38.5% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 18 35.3% 5:00 8 80.0% 5 55.6% 5 38.5% 4 57.1% 22 56.4% 4 33.3% 4 33.3% 26 51.0% 5:30 7 70.0% 5 55.6% 6 46.2% 4 57.1% 22 56.4% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 24 47.1% 6:00 p.m. 9 90.0% 4 44.4% 6 46.2% 4 57.1% 23 59.0% 5 41.7% 5 41.7% 28 54.9% --------------------------------•------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % N0. % NO. X NO. % NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. % NO. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 6 60.0% 4 44.4% 6 46.2% 3 42.9% 19 48.7% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 22 43.1% 9:30 6 60.0% 4 44.4% 6 46.2% 4 57.1% 20 51.3% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 23 45.1% 10:00 6 60.0% 5 55.6% 5 38.5% 4 57.1% 20 51.3% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 23 45.1% D 10:30 6 60.0% 4 44.4% 5 38.5% 3 42.9% 18 46.2% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 20 39.2% �-t 11:00 5 50.0% 3 33.3% 5 38.5% 4 57.1% 17 43.6% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 18 35.3% D 11:30 a.m. 4 40.0% 4 44.4% 4 30.8% 3 42.9% 15 38.5% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 17 33.3% NOON 4 40.0% 4 44.4% 3 23.1% 3 42.9% 14 35.9% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 16 31.4% 12:30 p.m. 4 40.0% 5 55.6% 2 15.4% 4 57.1% 15 38.5% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 18 35.3% 1:00 2 20.0% 5 55.6% 3 23.1% 4 57.1% 14 35.9% 4 33.3% 4 33.3% 18 35.3% 1:30 2 20.0% 4 44.4% 3 23.1% 4 57.1% 13 33.3X 4 33.3% 4 33.3% 17 33.3X m 2:00 9 90.0% 3 33.3% 3 23.1% 5 71.4% 20 51.3% 5 41.7% 5. 41.7% 25 49.0% 2:30 7 70.0% 4 44.4% 3 23.1% 4 57.1% 18 46.2% 5 41.7% 5 41.7% 23 45.1% 3:00 7 70.0% 3 33.3% 4 30.8% 5 71.4% 19 48.7% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 22 43.1% 3:30 5 50.0% 5 55.6% 3 23.1% 3 42.9% 16 41.0% 4 33.3% 4 33.3% 20 39.2% z 4:00 6 60.0% 5 55.6% 3 23.1% 2 28.6% 16 41.0% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 18 35.3% 4:30 6 60.0% 4 44.4% 3 23.1% 2 28.6% 15 38.5% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 17 33.3% Q 5:00 7 70.0% 3 33.3% 3 23.1% 2 28.6% 15 38.5% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 18 35.3% 5:30 8, 80.0% 5 55.6% 5 38.5% 3 42.9% 21 53.8% 4 33.3% 4 33.3% 25 49.0% 6:00 p.m. 10 100.0% 5 55.6% 6 46.2% 3 42.9% 24 61.5% 6 50..0% 6 50.0% 30 58.8% TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK E1 GREER 8 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners e=aaaaa=sa=aseaaaae==a=ass=e=aee=saaaaaaaaaaaaaeeaaaaaaa==s=eaaaaaaaaaaeae==aaaasa=a=asa===a=aea====a=saa===oe===caa===av=a=a=asa=aa====c==ccv==a=� PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET 6TH ORANGE 5TH OLIVE TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES . 13 5 18 9 45 0 45 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ......................................................... ............ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % N0. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % FRI, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 3 23.1% 6 120.0% 6 33.3% 3 33.3% 18 40.0% 18 40.0% 9:30 3 23.1% 7 140.0% 5 27.8% 4 44.4X 19 42.2% 19 42.2% 10:00 2 15.4% 5 100.0% 5 27.8% 2 22.2% 14 31.1% 14 31.1% 10:30 3 23.1% 5 100.0% 6 33.3% 4 44.4% 18 40.0% 18 40.0% 11:00 3 23.1% 5 100.0% 6 33.3% 4 44.4% 18 40.0% 18 40.0% 11:30 a.m. 3 23.1% 5 100.0% 6 33.3% 4 44.4% 18 40.0% 18 40.0% NOON 3 23.1% 4 80.0% 5 27.8% 5 55.6% 17 37.8% 17 37.8% 12:30 p.m. 2 15.4% 4 80.0% 5 27.8% 5 55.6% 16 35.6% 16 35.6% 1:00 2 15.4% 4 80.0% 3 16.7% 4 44.4% 13 28.9% 13 28.9% 1:30 2 15.4% 5 100.0% 6 33.3% 5 55.6% 18 40.0% 18 40.0% 2:00 2 15.4% 4 80.0% 5 27.8% 4 44.4% 15 33.3% 15 33.3% 2:30 3 23.1% 4 80.0% 4 22.2% 4 44.4% 15 33.3% 15 33.3% 3:00 2 15.4% 5 100.0% 5 27.8% 5 55.6% 17 37.8% 17 37.8% 3:30 3 23.1% 4 80.0% 5 27.8% 4 44.4% 16 35.6% 16 35.6% 4:00 3 23.1X 4 80.0% 5 27.8% 4 44.4% 16 35.6% 16 35.6% 4:30 4 30.8% 5 100.0% 4 22.2% 4 44.4% 17 37.8% 17 37.8% 5:00 3 23.1% 5 100.0% 4 22.2% 5 55.6% 17 37.8% 17 37.8% 5:30 3 23.1% 4 80.0% 5 27.8% 5 55.6% 17 37.8% 17 37.8% 6:00 p.m. 2 15.4% 5 100.0% 5 27.8% 4 44.4X 16 35.6% 16 35.6% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % N0. % NO. % SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 8 61.5% 3 60.0% 5 27.8% 5 55.6% 21 46.7% 21 46.7% 9:30 7 53.8% 3 60.0% 5 27.8% 5 55.6% 20 44.4% 20 44.4% 10:00 5 38.5% 5 100.0% 7 38.9% 4 44.4% 21 46.7% 21 46.7% 10:30 3 23.1% 4 80.0% 6 33.3% 3 33.3% 16 35.6% 16 35.6% D 11:00 4 30.8% 5 100.0% 8 44.4% 2 22.2% 19 42.2% 19 42.2% n 11:30 a.m. 6 46.2% 6 120.0% 8 44.4% 0 0.0% 20 44.4% 20 44.4% = NOON 2 15.4% 5 100.0% 6 33.3% 3 33.3% 16 35.6% 16 35.6% 12:30 p.m. 5 35.5% 5 100.0% 7 38.9% 2 22.2% 19 42.2% 19 42.2% m 1:00 3 23.1% 5 100.0% 8 44.4% 4 44.4% 20 44.4% 20 44.4% 1:30 3 23.1% 5 100.0% 6 33.3% 4 44.4% 18 40.0% 18 40.0% Z 2:00 4 30.8% 5 100.0% 7 38.9% 3 33.3% 19 42.2X 19 42.2% --� 2:30 6 46.2% 6 120.0% 8 44.4% 4 44.4% 24 53.3% 24 53.3% Z 3:00 7 53.8% 6 120.0% 5 27.8% 3 33.3% 21 46.7% 21 46.7% 3:30 6 46.2% 7 140.0% 3 16.7X 2 22.2% 18 40.OX 18 40.0% Q 4:00 4 30.8% 5 100.0% 6 33.3% 3 33.3% 18 40.0% 18 40.0% 4:30 3 23.1% 4 80.0% 4 22.2% 4 44.4% 15 33.3% 15 33.3% 5.00 3 23.1% 4 80.0% 2 11.1% 4 44.4% 13 28.9% 13 28.9% 5:30 4' 30.8% 4 80.0% 3 16.7% 3 33.3% 14 31.1% 14 31.1% 6:00 p.m. 5 38.5% 4 80.0% 5 27.8% 2 22.2% 16 35.6% 16 35.6% TABLE A-1 EXISTING PARKING BLOCK F1 GREER 3 CO. DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Engineers and Planners ------------ PARKINGa=a==aaa=aaa=eaecaeaecaaaaaaaasaaaaaa=aaaeea=aeaav=v=a.acoaea PARKING SUPPLY EXISTING SPACES ON-STREET BY BLOCK FACE OFF-STREET 3RD ORANGE 2ND OLIVE TOTAL 1 2 3 4 TOTAL TOTAL NO. OF SPACES . 15 7 12 9 43 0 43 --•----•-------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % N0. % NO. % N0. % NO. % NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X FRI, 2-19-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKO OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 11 73.3% 4 57.1% 4 33.3% 2 22.2% 21 48.8% 21 48.8% 9:30 11 73.3% 4 57.1% 4 33.3% 2 22.2% 21 48.8% 21 48.8% 10:OD 12 80.0% 2 28.6% 3 25.0% 3 33.3% 20 46.5% 20 46.5% 10:30 12 80.0% 3 42.9% 4 33.3% 3 33.3% 22 51.2% 22 51.2% 11:00 12 80.0% 2 28.6% 3 25.0% 3 33.3% 20 46.5% 20 46.5% 11:30 a.m. 12 80.0% 0 0.0% 1 8.3% 5 55.6% 18 41.9X 18 41.9% NOON 15 100.07. 2 28.6% 4 33.3% 2 22.2% 23 53.5% 23 53.5% 12:30 p.m. 16 106.7% 2 28.6% 3 25.0% 3 33.3% 24 55.8% 24 55.8% 1:00 16 106.77 2 28.6% 3 25.0% 3 33.3% 24 55.8% 24 55.8% 1:30 12 80.0% 2 28.6% 4 33.3% 4 44.4% 22 51.2% 22 51.2% 2:00 13 86.7% 2 28.61A 3 25.0% 4 44.4% 22 51.2% 22 51.2% 2:30 11 73.3% 2 28.6% 3 25.0% 4 44.4% 20 46.5% 20 46.5% 3:00 12 80.0% 2 28.6% 4 33.3% 4 44.4% 22 51.2% 22 51.2% 3:30 13 86.7% 2 28.6% 4 33.3% 3 33.3% 22 51.2% 22 51.2% 4:00 11 73.3% 2 28.6% 3 25.0% 3 33.3% 19 44.2% 19 44.2% 4:30 12 80.0% 3 42.9% 4 33.3% 3 33.3% 22 51.2% 22 51.2% 5:00 12 80.0% 2 28.6% 3 25.0% 3 33.3% 20 46.5% 20 46.5% 5:30 14 93.3% 3 42.9% 4 33.3% 4 44.4% 25 58.1% 25 58.1% 6:00 p.m. 13 86.7Y. 3 42.9% 4 33.3% 3 33.3X 23 53.5% 23 53.5% ---------------------------•------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------•----- ------------ PARKING OCCUPANCY NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. X NO. X NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. X NO. X SAT, 2-20-93 PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC PKD OCC TIME OF DAY 9:00 a.m. 12 80.0% 2 28.6% 2 16.7% 4 44.4% 20 46.5% 20 46.5% 9:30 14 93.3% 3 42.9% 3 25.0% 3 33.3% 23 53.5% 23 53.5% D 10:00 14 93.3% 3 42.9% 3 25.0% 2 22.2% 22 51.2% 22 51.2% 10:30 13 86.7X 3 42.9% 2 16.7% 3 33.3% 21 48.8% 21 48.8% 11:00 15 100.0% 3 42.9% 2 16.7% 2 22.2% 22 51.2% 22 51.2% D 11:30 a.m. 12 80.0% 3 42.9% 2 16.7% 3 33.3% 20 46.5% 20 46.5% NOON 12 80.0% 3 42.9% 4 33.3% 2 22.2% 21 48.8% 21 48.8% 12:30 p.m. 12 80.0% 3 42.9% 2 16.7% 2 22.2% 19 44.2% 19 44.2% 1:00 12 80.0% 3 42.9% 3 25.0% 3 33.3% 21 48.8% 21 48.8% 1:30 12 80.0% 3 42.9% 3 25.0% 2 22.2% 20 46.5% 20 46.5% m 2:00 12 80.0% 3 42.9% 3 25.0% 2 22.2% 20 46.5% 20 46.5% z 2:30 12 80.0% 4 57.1% 2 16.7% 2 22.2% 20 46.5% 20 46.5% 3:00 12 80.0% 4 57.1% 4 33.3% 3 33.3% 23 53.5% 23 53.5% 3:30 10 66.7Y. 4 57.1% 3 25.0% 3 33.3% 20 46.5% 20 46.5% Z 4:00 11 73.3% 5 71.4% 3 25.0% 4 44.4% 23 53.5% 23 53.5% 4:30 12 80.0% 4 57.1% 2 16.7% 4 44.4% 22 51.2% 22 51.2% 5:00 11 73.3% 3 42.9% 3 25.0% 3 33.3% 20 46.5% 20 46.5% 5:30 11, 73.3% 4 57.1% 4 33.3% 2 22.2% 21 48.8% 21 48.8% 6:00 p.m. 12 80.0% 4 57.1% 2 16.7% 4 44.4% 22 51.2% 22 51.2% r - Cl�a�r6er o)`�irnrerce - July 6, 1993 Chairman Roy Richardson and Members of the Planning Commission 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Chairman Richardson: The Chamber of Commerce has been a long time supporter of redevelopment plans in the downtown area and continues to support projects that will generate additional sales and property tax revenues . An issue that continues to re-surface over the years in the downtown is the importance of adequate parking. The Chamber agrees that an adequate supply of parking is necessary for the downtown to be successful. And, for that reason, the Chamber supports the concept of joint use or shared parking within the downtown area in order to efficiently utilize the supply of parking. This area functions very much the same as the large shopping center or mall and should be evaluated as a single area of mixed uses, not as individual stand alone uses . There appears to be a sufficient number and variety of uses to have the joint/shared parking use concept work. It is important to note that the cost of providing parking within a parking structure is extremely expensive, making it important to have a correct balance between the need for parking spaces and the availability of such spaces . Also, it is not practical to satisfy 100% of the parking demand on worst case basis, ie: beach crowds, or extraordinary holidays and weekends. (e.g. PierFest, OP Pro, 4th of July. ) " The Chamber believes that a "qualified estimate" of parking needs should be prepared with merchants and owners participating in utilizing the existing supply of spaces, and that a backup plan be prepared to provide additional parking if the need is demonstrated. This can be done by having a parking plan prepared based on a professional estimate and by montoring the situation to determine any increase in parking needs . ff expectation are being exceeded, the backup plan should be instituted. 2100 Main Street Suite 200 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 714/536-8888 cr,7,e,o�,-_�cs.. It is important to the city's economic vitality that new businesses be given the opportunity to locate within the downtown to enhance the City's tax base by increased sales and property taxes. We urge your support of the shared parking concept. Sincerely, Pa 1 Cook Chairman PC/sj cc: Uberuaga Silver 17 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 20451 Craimer Lane P-O.Bo:71 Huntington Beach.California 92648 (714)964-8888 C) BOARD OF TRUSTEES July 6, 1993 Shirley Carey President Brian Garland Clerk Mr. Mike Adams Robert Mann,Ed.D. Director of Community Development Member City of Huntington Beach 2WO Main Street Catherine Member Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Me Brian E.Recnstemer Re: Code Amendment 92-5 Downtown Specific Plan Code Member ADMINISTRATION Dear Mike: The Huntington Beach City School District has reviewed the school facilities Duane A.Dished t D. language ro proposed for the Downtown Specific Plan. While the language is a Superintendent P P Pe major step forward in City/School District relations, we would propose two slight �n Rasmussen,Ed.D. changes: Assistant Superintenoent PersonnevEducationai 1) The district would like to be included in the waiver process. The Holly- Services Seacliff Specific Plan allows for the mitigation language to be waived by Jerry Buchanan the Board of Trustees of the Huntington Beach City School District. Assistant Superintendent Busynessss Services Perhaps a joint waiver would be feasible. 2) The waiver of affordable housing from mitigation creates the need for higher fees on non-affordable housing to provide for adequate school facilities. With the bonuses offered in Affordable Housing Portion (4.2.29)of the plan,this could be a sizeable number of units with no mitigation. Please eliminate the waiver of affordable housing. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jerry S. Buchanan Assistant Superintendent Business Services j cc: Duane Dishno, Ed.D. WEISMANN EQUITY COMPANY 300 Pacific Coast Hwy., Suite 308 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 714)3 74-081013 74-0811 Fax-# (714) 374-0812 June 28, 1993 J?ECEI VF JUN 3 0 1993 Miss Susan Pierce Huntington Beach CEIARTMENT OF Huntington Beach, CAn92648 d Zoning EOh{1t;;r' YUcVEIOPME.NT RE: Change of Zoning Dear Miss Pierce, We wish for the City of Huntington Beach to consider changing the zoning for 111 through 115 7th Street from residential to commercial. We are in preliminary discussions in regards to developing a national chain hotel on this and the adjacent property currently occupied by Pasha's Liquor. Please call me at my office if you have additional questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Will a ras C.C. Paul Wei ann 2sp4w628 do altiTa,' Donald M Perry M116 313 2nd Street Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 April 9,1993 Planning Commission Main Street Huntington Beach, Calif Dear Sir It has recently been brought to my attention that a project is being considered for the comer of 3rd Street and Olive in downtown H.B. That project is for construction of 30 units of residential housing called an "AFFORDABLE HOUSING'. I really don't believe that you should burden the local properties with that type of housing. There is ample experience in the housing field to show that it is better to scatter lesser quality units throughout the whole project instead of trying to put those units into one place. You also may burden the local surrounding property owners including myself with a negative resale value. It is also my impression the city is going to burden itself with subsidizing each unit in that project of 30 units to the tune of $20,000 or more. Where was the city when I was doing my building? This is not fair. Please don't think I am against construction in downtown, I say build here and not on the wet lands of Bolsa Chica. I am a long iii a msident of Huntington Beach. Yours truly, IDr=W RA Par r1J HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRIC* 20451 Cramer lane P O Box 71 Huntington Beach.Catitornia 92646 (7141 964.6888 Wd0 February 12 , 1993 Q� e) BOARD OF TRUSTEES , - c Mr. Michael T. Uberuaga SPresid grey City Administrator � City of Huntington Beach Brian Garland 2000 Main Street Clerk Huntington Beach, California 92648 Robert Mann.Ed-D. Member Subject: Mitigation of Development Impacts on the Catherine McGough Huntington Beach City School District Member Brian E.Recnstemer Dear Mr. Uberuaga: Member This letter is intended to update you and the rest of ADMINISTRATION the City of Huntington Beach ("City") staff, as well as the City Council and Planning Commission, of the Dane A Diehno.Ed D current condition of the Huntington Beach City School Superintendent District ("District") and recent legislation concerning school impact mitigation. Aian Rasmussen.Ed-D. Assistant Superintendent Personnel/Educational The District remains near capacity and unable to Services adequately accommodate new students generated by Jerry Buchanan development without mitigation in excess of statutory AssistantSuoenntendent development fees. On the bright side, the District is Business Services near completion of its Capital Facilities Strategic Master Plan and Asset Management Program ("Master Plan") . The Master Plan will help the District logically and efficiently plan and construct school facilities required to accommodate increasing enrollments. Attached is a more detailed discussion of the District's facilities and the impacts of development. Additionally, copies of the Master Plan will be transmitted to the City after it is adopted by the District's Board. As you know, for the past several months the District has been challenging City approval of development projects and land use actions in an attempt to ensure Adequate mitigation of the impacts of these items on the District. Over the course of these months, the City and District have gained a better understanding of each other. Together, we have evolved stan(Sard condition of approval language which ensures adequate mitigation of school impacts, while allowing development to proceed. Similar language was made a condition of approval on the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan and NESI project Mr. Michael T. Uberuaga February 12, 1993 Page 2 0 and has been proposed by City Staff for the Coultrup project. Unfortunately, Senate Bill No. 1287 ("SB 128711) has limited the methods the City and District can employ to mitigate school impacts. The District believes that the basic concept of school mitigation that the City and District have been pursuing is still sound, but the condition of approval language may need to be modified somewhat. The District has drafted the following modified mitigation language which it feels is legal and in the same spirit as previous City-approved condition of approval language: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the developer shall mitigate the impacts of the project on school facilities, using any combination of measures listed in Government Code Section 65996 or other legal means, to a level acceptable to the appropriate school district(s) for K-12 . This condition may be waived by the appropriate school district(s) . The District therefore requests that the City impose the proposed mitigation language as a condition of approval for all development projects and land use actions. Attached is a detailed discussion of the ramifications of SB 1287 . Thank you for your consideration and assistance. If you have any questions or desire additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Jerry S. Buchanan Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Huntington Beach City School District attachments cc: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission Ms. Gail Hutton, City Attorney Mr. Mike Adams, Director of Community Development Mr. Howard Zelefski, Planning Director Mr. Hal Simmons, Planning Department Mr. Jack Bowland, Chairman of GPAC City of Huntington Beach Mr. Michael T. Uberuaga February 12 , 1993 Page 3 cc: Gary A. Burgner, Ed.D. , Assistant Superintendent Huntington Beach Union High School District Stanley Oswalt, Ed.D. , Assistant Superintendent Ocean View School District Mark Ecker, Ph.D. , Assistant Superintendent Fountain Valley School District Ms. Barbara Winars, Assistant Superintendent Westminister School District President and Members of the Board of Education Duane Dishno, Ed.D. , Superintendent Huntington Beach City School District Mr. Marshall B. Krupp, President Community Systems Associates, Inc. Mr. Woody Tescher, Consultant Envicom Corporation ATTACHMENT "A" TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION State of the District The Huntington Beach City School District ("District") covers portions of the City of Huntington Beach and portions of the unincorporated areas of Orange County. The District serves grades K-8 through the operation of eight (8) schools, consisting of six (6) K-5 elementary school and two (2) 6-8 middle schools. Additionally, the District maintains four (4) closed sites, one of which is used as the District office. Of these twelve (12) schools, seven (7) are twenty years old or older, and two (2) are over thirty years old. The District has experienced a variety of enrollment changes over the last thirteen (13) years. From 1979 to 1987, student enrollments declined at a rate of 4.2% per year. However, a new trend has begun, starting in the 1988 school year, of a gradual, but modest increase in student enrollment. The District's Developer Fee Report identifies an enrollment of 5,303 students in 1987/88. This figure has increased to 5,675 students as of October of 1991, representing an average annual increase of 1.71% between 1987 - 1991. For the 1992/93 school year enrollments have increased to 5,751 students, or an increase of approximately 1.34% from the previous year. The District prepared an Enrollment Projections Study in February of 1992. This study predicted growth of about 2.00% per year throughout the 1990s, based primarily on infill development. Additionally, a number of large residential developments (i.e., Holly- Seacliff, Bolsa Chica, Magnolia Pacific, etc.) have been proposed or adopted which may cause significant additional student enrollment increases within the District. The District's operating school facilities are currently facing severe capacity shortcomings, necessitating the addition of portable classrooms, the construction of new permanent school facilities and/or the reconstruction and expansion of existing school facilities. As of October 14, 1992, the District's capacity utilization and surplus/deficit capacity can be ._ seen, as follows: A - 1 1992/93 School Year Capacity Utilization Surplus/ School Capacity Enrollment Utilization (Deficit) Eader 780 683 87.56% 97 Hawes 390 414 106.15% (24) Kettler 720 705 97.92% 15 Moffett 690 682 98.84% 8 Perry 540 579 107.22% (39) Smith 720 714 99.17% 6 K-5 Total 3,840 3,777 98.36% 63 Dwyer 780 853 109.36% (73) Sowers 1,110 1.121 100.99% (11) 6-8 Total 1,890 1,974 104.44% (84) K-8 Total 5,730 5,751 100.37% (21) In practice, students are rarely divisible into uniform class sizes, and individual class enrollments tend to fluctuate over the course of the school year. As such it is difficult to achieve 100% capacity utilization. It is a generally accepted practice to consider school facilities to be impacted if utilization exceeds 85%. Capacity utilization in excess of 100% indicates actual overcrowding of school facilities, resulting in the loading of classrooms above State standards or the use of non-classrooms (i.e., libraries) for classroom purposes. As shown above, the District's facilities are currently overcrowded. All subsequent enrollment increases will require expansion of District facilities. The District is developing a Capital Facilities Strategic Master Plan and Asset Management Program ("Master Plan"). The preliminary draft of the Master Plan projects increases in enrollment for the next ten years, with a total K-8 enrollment of 8,204 by school year 2002-03. The Master Plan projects a total K-8 enrollment of 8,636 at mid- intensity buildout. To accommodate the projected enrollment growth the District will need to develop two to three additional elementary schools (Holly-Seacliff and one to two yet to be located) on the west side of the District. Middle school enrollment increases are anticipated to be accommodated by reopening the Peterson School and by increasing the capacity of the Dwyer School with new permanent construction. Impact of Development The District's Development Fee Report, last updated February 18. 1992, determined that on average, there are 0.1869 K-8 students per occupied housing unit within the District. The District has found, however, that this number is not a good estimator of student yield from new development, because it is based on the total housing stock within the District A - 2 which includes a number of senior and non-child households. In 1991, Mr. Clyde Glasser of the District conducted a survey of new development within the District and determined a K-8 student generation factor ("SGF") of 0.2695. This includes a K-6 component of 0.2084 and a 7-8 component of 0.611. This survey included the Town Square, Pier Colony, Huntington Place, Seacliff Estates, Ocean Point, The Villas, The Huntington Classics, The Heritage at Huntington Shores, and Central Park developments. These developments depict a representative range of housing types, sizes, and costs. Since originally conducting the survey, Mr. Glasser has monitored its results and analyzed in greater detail the factors that determine student yield. The results of his analyses show there are a large number of variables which influence SGFs, many of which cannot be estimated before a development is planned or even built. Because of this variability, the District believes it is best to use an average SGF rather than factors based on different housing types, sizes, etc. The District feels its survey determined SGF of 0.2695 is the best estimator of student generation for new development. To accommodate additional students generated by development, the District will need to add portable classrooms, refurbish and redesign existing facilities, construct additional permanent classrooms at open schools, reopen one or more schools and/or develop one or more new schools. The District also requires offsite support facilities such as a maintenance and operations yard. The full cost of accommodating an additional student assuming land, new classroom construction (70% permanent and 30% relocatable), and offsite support facilities is $21,767 for K-6 and $33,808 for 7-8. These amounts are in 1992/93 dollars. Multiplying the SGF for each grade level by the District facilities cost per student for that grade level results in the total impact on the District per housing unit. This equates to approximately $6,602. Based on the average size of housing units developed within the District (1,600 square feet), the impact on the District per square foot of residential development is estimated to be $4.13. However, the District has certain facility and land assets which can be employed to partially offset the full impact of development, perhaps the most useful of which are the District's closed schools. In order to house the projected increased student enrollments, the Master Plan contains a school facilities development program. This program calls for the rehabilitation of and expansion of existing schools, reopening of two of the Districts closed sites, and the acquisition and development of three new schools (two schools in addition to the Holly-Seacliff school). Unfortunately, the District's other closed schools cannot be used to house new students, because much of the new residential development will occur on the west side of the District while all the closed schools are on the east side. Sending`students to schools far away from their homes would violate the District's commitment to neighborhood schools and require prohibitively expensive bussing. A - 3 The total cost of this development program in 1992 dollars is estimated to be $56,350,000. The resulting cost to the District per additional housing unit would be approximately $4,612, (based upon 12,219 housing units projected to be developed within the District by mid-intensity buildout). Based on an average housing unit size of 1,600 square feet, the cost to the District per square foot of residential development is estimated to be $2.88. Comparison of Impact Estimates Full Impact Master Plan Impact Impact per Housing Unit $6,601.91 $4,611.67 Impact per Square Foot 1 $4.13 $2.88 To offset the impacts described above, the District is allowed under State law to levy fees on development up to certain maximum levels. Current California Law concerning school development fees was established by Assembly Bill No. 1600 ("AB 1600") and Assembly Bill No. 181 ("AB 181"), and recently amended by Senate Bill No. 1287 ("SB 1287"). AB 1600 and AB 181 allow a total of $1.65 per square foot of residential development and $0.27 per square foot on commercial/industrial development to be collected by school districts. These fees must be shared by non-unified school districts with overlapping territory, such as a high school district and its feeder elementary school districts. Based on a fee sharing agreement with the Huntington Beach Union High School District, the District's share of these fees is 61%, or $1.0065 per square foot for residential development. This amount is clearly much less than the $4.13 full impact or $2.88 Master Plan impact derived above. Senate Bill No. 1287 ("SB 1287"), which became operative January 1, 1993, authorizes school districts to levy development fees higher than allowed pursuant to AB 1600 and AB 181. Pursuant to SB 1287, an additional $1.00 per square foot may be assessed by school districts on residential development. The law is unclear as to whether non-unified school districts must share this additional fee, or if each district may assess a full $1.00 per square foot. Within the next few months it is likely that either a court will render an interpretation of SB 1287 or the State Legislature will clarify its intent. The District is currently assessing a full additional dollar, for a total fee of $2.0065 per square foot. If-through subsequent court ruling or legislation, the District is only able to assess a share of the additional $1.00, it will be able to collect a total fee of $1.6165 per square foot. Both fees are still less than the $4.13 full impact or $2.88 Master Ran impact derived above. A - 4 i Comparison of Impact and Fee Estimates Per Housing Unit Per Square Foot Full Impact $6,601.91 $4.13 Master Plan Impact $4,611.67 $2.88 AB 1600 & AB 181 Fees $1,610.40 $1.0065 Shared SB 1287 Fees $2,586.40 $1.6165 Full SB 1287 Fees $3,210.40 $2.0065 However, the increased fee level afforded by SB 1287 will become inoperative if the California electorate rejects Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 6 ("ACA 6") which will appear on the next Statewide election, currently scheduled in June of 1994. Many development projects and land use actions approved now or in the near future will not result in the pulling of building permits (when school development fees are paid) until after June 1994. Hence, it is uncertain which of these fee structures will be in place when the school development fees are actually paid. Never the less, because all fee levels are lower than the impacts on the District, it is clear that some additional source of mitigation will be required to offset the impacts on the District. The District feels therefore, that language requiring the complete mitigation of impacts on the District should be made a condition of approval on all development projects and land use actions. Ramifications of SB 1287 on School Impact Mitigation SB 1287 was passed by the State Legislature and signed by the Governor as part of the 1992 budget deal. It became effective January 1, 1993. The intent of this bill was to move a greater share of responsibility for school facilities funding to local school districts. In fact, SB 1287 calls for the phase out of the Leroy F. Greene State School Building Lease-Purchase Program ("State Program") by 1996. SB 1287 is "tied" to ACA 6. If passed by the voters in the next statewide election (currently scheduled for June 1994), ACA 6 will allow school districts to pass general- obligation bonds by a simple majority vote rather than the current two-thirds. However, if the California electorate rejects ACA 6, SB 1287 will become inoperative and the State Program will remain intact. As mentioned above, SB 1287 allows school districts to levy an additional development fee of $1.00 per square foot on residential development. As a tradeoff for the increased fee levels, SB 1287 attempted to reduce the number of mitigation measures that can be used to offset school impacts. A - 5 The measures available to mitigate impacts on schools of development projects are limited by Government Code Section 65996. Prior to SB 1287, legislative actions (such as general plan amendments, specific plans, and zone changes) where not considered development projects, so a wider array of mitigation options was available for such actions. SB 1287 attempted to place legislative actions under the requirements Government Code Section 65996. Government Code Section 65996 lists the following seven mitigation measures: (1) Chapter 22 (commencing with Section 17700) of Part 10 of the Education Code. This chapter sets forth the provisions of the State Program created by the Leroy F. Greene State School Building Lease-Purchase Law of 1976. The State Program is funded through statewide general obligation bonds such as those approved by Propositions 152 and 155. Because the demand for state money far exceeds the supply of statewide bond funds, only a small percentage of school projects are funded through the State Program. None the less, the District is applying for funding through the State Program to the fullest extent possible. The District has provisions in all its existing mitigation agreements with developers that would lower developer contributions to the extent state funding is obtained. Additionally, the State Program will be phased out by 1996 if the California voters approve ACA 6. (2) Chapter 25 (commencing with Section 17785) of Part 10 of the Education Code. This chapter was enacted by the Emergency School Classroom Law of 1979 which includes provisions for the lease of state portable facilities to address emergency overcrowding conditions. It does not provide funding for permanent facilities and is useful only in emergency situations. (3) Chapter 28 (commencing with Section 17870) of Part 10 of the Education Code. This chapter sets forth the provisions of the California School Finance Authority. This .s a statewide financing vehicle that school districts can employ to gain the benefits of statewide rather than local financing. It does not provide additional revenue, but is only a financing tool. (4) Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 39327) of Chapter 3 Part 23 of the Education Code. This article provides school districts with the authority to enter into a lease or other agreement for school facilities with non-profit corporations. This allows for the establishment of a non-profit corporation whose function is to sell bonds and build A - 6 school facilities and, in turn, lease the facilities to the school district. However, it - does not solve the fundamental question of how the school facilities will be paid for. (5) Section 53080 of the Government Code. This section sets forth the statutory development fees discussed above. (6) Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 53311) of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code. This chapter was established by the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 which allows for the creation of community facilities districts to fund public facilities including schools. The bonds issued to construct public facilities are repaid by annual fees levied against parcels within a community facilities district. (7) Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970) of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. This chapter was established by the School Facilities Act which allows a city or county to levy development fees (known as "SB 201 fees") on behalf of a school district to fund interim classroom facilities. Any fees levied pursuant to this chapter reduce the ability of school districts to levy fees pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. In practice, these fees have been superseded by those set forth in Government Code Section 53080. Additionally, in Murrieta Valley Unified School District v. County of Riverside, the court ruled that cities or counties can impose non-financial mitigation measures in addition to the seven financial measures listed in Government Code Section 65996. Such non- financial mitigation measures could include density reductions, project phasing, or senior- only housing. Nothing in SB 1287 prohibited the use of such non-financial mitigation measures. Because SB 1287 was only recently adopted, its legal interpretation remains uncertain. It appears that a city or county may not have the power to require financial mitigation measures other than those specified in Government Code Section 65996. Most attorneys agree, however, that a city or county can still deny a legislative action or require non- financial mitigation measures. Additionally, Government Code Section 65996 allows the.- use of Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts with charges in excess of State mandated development fees. Some attorneys believe that a city or county may have the ability to require mitigation in excess of fees if the existing General Plan requires adequate school facilities. However, while SB 1287 may have limited the number of mitigation measures available, in no way did it preclude the requirement that development projects or land use actions must comply with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Legislative A - 7 Counsel of California has issued an opinion that SB 1287 "does not prohibit a city, , county, or city and county from considering the adequacy of school facilities in the course of adopting or implementing a general plan, zoning ordinance, or other legislative land use policy." The impacts on the District of each project must be evaluated, and all impacts must be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Hence, the net effect of SIB 1287 is to limit the types of measures that may be used to mitigate school impacts, but not the total mitigation of impacts. In order to comply with the provisions of SIB 1287 while maintaining the spirit of school facilities impact mitigation program that the City and District have evolved, the District is providing draft language for a condition of approval to be added to all development projects and land use actions. The City has applied the following, or similar, language as a condition of approval to many development entitlements: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the developer shall enter into a school facilities impact mitigation and reimbursement agreement with the appropriate school district(s) for K-12. This condition may be waived by the appropriate school district. The District has modified this language as follows: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the developer shall mitigate the impacts of the project on school facilities, using any combination of measures listed in Government Code Section 65996 or other legal means, to a level acceptable to the appropriate school district(s) for K-12. This condition may be waived by the appropriate school district(s). The District feels that this modified condition of approval language is legally acceptable and roughly equivalent to, though somewhat more restrictive than, the previous condition of approval language. Its application will ensure adequate mitigation of school impacts while allowing development to proceed. The District therefore requests that the City impose this language as a condition of approval for all development projects and land use actions. A - 8 ATTACHMENT "B" SENATE BILL NO. 1287 • B - 1 t _ I STATUTES OF 1 1991-1992 REGULAR SESSION Ch. 1354 SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS—FACILITIES—FUNDING outside the State of California of time unrelated to the senta CHAPTER 1354 ! �e signed before the state - of a birth parent in. ended period of time. S.B. No. 1287 to sign a consent for the adopti A:vq ACT to add and repeal Article 5(commencing with Section 17760)of Chapter 22 of Part 10 of t to revocation by reason of the Education Code,to amend Sections 65995 and 65996 of, and to add and repeal Sections 65995.65995.3,and 65996 of,the Government Code,and to repeal Section 34 of Chapter 1209 of the Statutes of 1989, relating to school facilities. y to read: r j d by the birth parent or p (Approved by Governor September 30, 1992.) -it or parents signing the co [Mled with Secretary of State September 30, 1992.] w s: ncy a ritten statement revo ' LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST .0 the birth parent or parer ortn prescn-bed by the departm SB 1287, School facilities. nt or delegated county adop' (1) Under existing law, the State Allocation Board is authorized to apportion fun( zia nor is physically present for school facilities projects, for designated construction purposes, on behalf of appli- i agency.licensed or authorized school districts under the Leroy F. Greene State School Building Lease-Purchase Lai sides, or is present for a p 1976. -evoke consent may not be $i This bill would repeal that program, pursuant to certain legislative findings, a Department of Social S - hoary 1, 1996. -it on the 121st day after si The bill would state that the changes specified above shall become operative only u T )f the right to revoke consent ACA 6 is approved by a majority of the voters voting on that measure. ze consent was signed, which . (2) Existing law authorizes local agencies to impose limited fees or other charges against certain development projects to fund the construction or reconstruction of school to read: ' facilities. as become permanent as pro, This bill would authorize the levy of an additional fee, for school facilities purposes, on spective adoptive parents may pertain residential construction of up to $1 per square foot of assessable space. Existing law prohibits the legislative body of a local agency from levying development )ecomes permanent as provid ices or other requirements for the construction or reconstruction of schools, other than st return of the child. In suels pursuant to designated statutory authority. z parent or parents so reques This bill would specify that this prohibition applies to both administrative and legisla- :3een placed have concerns that ti*e action of the legislative body of a local agency. are unfit or present a dan Under existing law,development fees or other requirements to fund school construction ption is to report their concerts; er reconstruction may be imposed against residential construction other than new con- :te child welfare agency. ;... traction only where the resulting increase in assessable space, as defined, resultingfrom y return the child. = de construction exceeds 500 square feet. Existing law also excludes designated chool 1994. !'Cilit9 expenses from the "construction or reconstruction" purposes for which the independent adoption filed t eloper fees or other consideration may be expended, authorizes the expenditure of up the lti. 15 of the fees collected in any fiscal year for administrative costs incurred in collecting e shall be governed by 5*fees or other consideration, defines the "assessable space" of residential development, nd the "chargeable covered and enclosed space" of commercial or industrial develop- ;hall adopt emergency re Oat,that are subject to a development fee or other requirement, and specifies that the '&ar amount of the maximum developer fee or other requirement shall be increased for .vernment Code, if the Co lilflto0n every 2 years. -is costs mandated by the.. E163ting law also contains the legislative finding that the provisions of existing law s for those costs shall be' �d in the preceding paragraph are declaratory of existing law. i of Division 4 of 'Lytle 2 °_ �' g .or reimbursement does not _ his bill would repeal that legislative finding. )e made from the State 0) Existing law prescribes the exclusive methods that &ay be required by local overnment Code, unless 0 "a " to mitigate environmental effects related to the adequacy of school facilities ecome operative on the saw "I considering, under the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), the approv- )nstitution. Additions or changes indicated by underline. deletions by asterisks ' ' 5769 itions by asterisks i Ch. 1354 STATUTES OF lyn YT- al, or the establishment of conditions for the approval, of a development project, which .,w.r�.. defined to mean a project undertaken for the purpose of development, including a proje snail be involving the issuance of a permit for construction or reconstruction. Existing law klao permit. -.�•�• prohibits a public agency, under CEQA or the Subdivision Map Act, from denyie s�nct;:: _ approval of a project on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities. (2) In This bill would prohibit a public agency, in the exercise of its authority to adopt generg per squ. plans, zoning laws, and other land use legislation, from either denying approval of a enclosed project on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities or imposing conditions, other than vithin t: the requirement to pay the limited school facilities fees, on the approval of a project for areas in the purpose of providing school facilities. =enclos The bill also would delete the definition of development project, as described above,sad covered would specify that the restrictions described above upon the mitigation of environments) shall be effects under CEQA apply to both administrative and legislative action taken by a pubiie pe''mt`' agency under CEQA. (3) The The bill would specify that these changes shall have prospective application off, th and �:he sta (4) This bill would specify that the changes described in (2) and (3) are repealed on the Board at date that ACA 6 fails to receive the approval of a majority of the voters voting on tha; --eeting measure. Jiwre calc The people of the State of California do enact as follows: :rider ;his (c) (1) N SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to enact a new program for the entered in: financing of school facilities in accordance with the following principles: manr;, wi (a) Primary financial responsibility for school facilities should rest with school districts pa)Tnent c (b) School districts should be authorized to raise a sufficient amount of revenue kcat -znamon to finance a majority of their school facility needs. -'uoter ap; (c) The role of the state should be limited to: (2) .UY C (1) Using state funds to supplement the local revenues of those school districts har maimenced x other re low assessed valuation. l;plicable : (2) Using state funds to finance needed school facilities for those school districts the �d) For pt have met or exceeded their debt capacity. 1�develoom (3) using state funds to provide interim school facilities for those school districts the a thereby e are unable to supply the expected level of local revenues. -u!usively z j SEC. 2. Article 5 (commencing with Section 11760) is added to Chapter 22 of Part H -ode.or an)• of the Education Code, to read: 7 local gov'E of limited iti:imum te: Article 5. Repeal of Chapter 'nidertial h. 17760. This chapter shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1996, and as of tw 'a?Lh and S date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted before January 1, 199E t1 The Le deletes or extends that date. k ities nit: SEC. 3. Section 65995 of the Government Code is amended to read: -'-63lature 65995. (a) Except for a fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement authorized ands t-elopTe"t Section 53080, or pursuant to Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970), no so' a+ures on - charge, dedication, or other requirement shall be levied by the legislative body of s ba -) Nothing agency against a development project, as defined in Section 53080, for the constructioe'r =amencing �- reconstruction of school facilities. 'construction (b) In no event shall the amount of any fees, charges, dedications, or other rrqW' ' I This sec ments authorized under Section 53080, or pursuant to Chapter 4.7 (commencing the Section 65970), or both, exceed the following: (1) One dollar and fifty cents ($1.50) per square foot of assessable space, in the case a, of that any residential development. "Assessable space," for this purpose, means all of* :E square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including anv Cal?s�' `�55 walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached ncessory structure,or 6�0 (a) x area. The amount of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential sum n 530t0 fie. dedica: Able- 5770 Additions or changes indicated by underline; deletions by asterisks boo lift :t+-. L 3 gTATL'TES OF; 1991-1992 REGULAR SE38ION Ch. 1354 ... a development project,Which shall be calculated by the building department of the city or count} issuing the building development, including a p. permit, in accordance with the standard practice of that city or county in calculating .construction. Existing law: structural perimeters. ivision Map Act, from den .(2) In the case of any commercial or industrial development, twenty-five cents ($0.25) :hool facilities. per square foot of chargeable covered and enclosed space. "Chargeable covered and of its authority to adopt ge enclosed space," for this purpose, means the covered and enclosed space determined to be m either denying approval,b Within the perimeter of a commercial or industrial structure, not including any storage r imposing conditions, other than dress incidental to the principal use of the development, garage, parking structure, on the approval of a project ttxZe . 7 unenclosed walkway, or utility or disposal area. The determination of the chargeable covered and enclosed space within the perimeter of a commercial or industrial structure t project, as described above; shall be made by the building department of the city or county issuing the building 1 the mitigation of environmenQ permit, in accordance with the building standards of that city or county. gislative action taken by a pu.k °(3) The amount of the limits set forth in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be increased in J - 1990, and every two years thereafter, according to the adjustment for inflation set forth ,ve prospective application in the statewide cost index for class B construction,as determined by the State Allocation in (2)and (3) are repealed oii-16 Board at its January meeting, which increase shall be effective as of the date of that �rity of the voters voting oa.thI meeting. The State Allocation Board shall not raise the amount of the district matching share calculated under Section 17705.5 of the Education Code, as a result of the increase ender this paragraph, until at least 90 days after the date of that increase. llous: , (c) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, during the term of any contract > enact a new program for - entered into between a subdivider or builder and a school district, city, county, or city and )wing principles: _ county, whether general law or chartered, on or before January 1, 1987, that requires the should rest with school diattieb:� payment of a fee, charge, or dedication for the construction of school facilities as a condition to the approval of residential development, neither Section 53080 nor this ficient amount of revenue loot j chapter applies to that residential development. (2) Any development project for which a final map was approved and construction had commenced on or before September 1, 1986, is subject to only the fee, charge, dedication, a of those school districts-. or mother requirement prescribed in any local ordinance in existence on that date and applicable to the project. as for those school districts.*9rt (d) For purposes of Section 53080 and this chapter, "residential, commercial, or industri- r- 0 development" does not include any facility used exclusively for religious purposes that �s for those school district .` is thereby exempt from property taxation under the laws of this state, any facility used aelusively as a private full-time day school as described in Section 48222 of the Education 3 Code,or any facility that is owned and occupied by one or more agencies of federal, state, i added to Chapter 22 of Put or local government. In addition, "commercial or industrial development" includes,but is limited to, any hotel, inn, motel, tourist home, or other lodging for which the :fit mamum term of occupancy for guests does not exceed 30 days, but does not include any �r x ieaidential hotel, as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 50519 of the Health and Safety Code. January afore ore January and sal `: {e) 'The Legislature finds and declares that the subject of the financing of school enacted be d_ heilities with development fees is a matter of statewide concern. For this reason the Iislature hereby occupies the subject matter of mandatory development fees and other mended to read: r.-s icrelopment requirements for school facilities finance to the exclusion of all local !r requirement authorized t& ensures on the subject:. g with Section 65910),O s 1 0) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to limit or prohibit the use of Chapter 2.5 y the legislative body `ommencing with Section 53311) of Division 2 of Title 5 to finance the construction or >n 53080, for the constsac'b 110natruction of school facilities. dedications, or other. This section shall become inoperative on January 1. 1993 and shall remain inovera- Chapter 4.7 (commen� �*tn until the ate that Assem v ConstitutionalAmendment 6 of the 1991-92 Re lar ;o ai s W receive the approves of a maoriry of the voters voting on the measureassessable space >n th° s 01 teat ate this section shall become operative �-�' ' °� 4• Section 65995 is added to the Government Code,ills purpose, means to read: sue=. �'Ri995. tore, not including anY al (a) Except for a fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement authorized under i accessory structure'of Doti 53080, or pursuant to Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970), no fee, neter of a residential La - !k?'ie,dedication, or other requirement shall be levied by the legislative body of a local s by asbrisb • ,' ;—t'f _ Additions or changes Indicated by underline; daletlons by asterisks 5771 sir µ :S Ch. 1354 STATUTES OF 1991-I992 RI } agency against a development project, as defined in Section 53080, whether by administer Tr' tive or legislative, action, for the construction or reconstruction of school fact7ip. (D Nothing �- iwmrnenc:ng v (b) In no event shall the amount of any fees, charges, dedications, or other reqajf,� construction ments authorized under Section 53080, or pursuant to Chapter 4.7 (commencing With �) This sect Section 65970), or both, exceed the following: :� . . lmendment 6 �• vi (1) One dollar and fifty cents ($1.50)per square foot of assessable space, in the cW•a o{ the voters +1i►'`~ '' any residential development. "Assessable space," for this purpose, means all of16 SEC. 5• S, square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, 65995.3. (a) walkway, garage, overhang,patio,enclosed patio, detached accessory structure,or simiW -� area. The amount of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential struc*i subdivision (b)I shall be calculated by the building department of the city or county issuing the build toent o. one permit, in accordance with the standard practice of that city or county in calculation loverning boa_ structural perimeters. ' sabparngrapns „r. mnstruc::on or (2) In the case of any commercial or industrial development, twenty.five cents ($0,Q (b) This sect. per square foot of chargeable covered and enclosed space. Chargeable covered ti°d Amendment 6 �. enclosed space," for this purpose, means the covered and enclosed space determined to)* of the voterswithin the perimeter of a commercial or industrial structure, not including any storigt areas incidental to the principal use of the development, garage, parking structnrq SEC. 6. Se unenclosed walkway, or utility or disposal area. The determination of the chargeable 65996. (a) T covered and enclosed space within the perimeter of a commercial or industrial structoas eovironmertal shall be made by the building department of the city or county issuing the buil&C approval or the permit, in accordance with the building standards of that city or county. kfned in Sec-' AW _: - (3) The amount of the limits set forth in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be increased i Public Resourc 1990, and every two years thereafter, according to the adjustment for inflation set forth (1) Chanter in the statewide cost index for class B construction, as determined by the State Allocati°e 1� Chapter f Board at its January meeting, which increase shall be effective as of the date of flit Chapter meeting. The State Allocation Board shall not raise the amount of the district match* share calculated under Section 17705.5 of the Education Code, as a result of the increin (4) Article 2. under this paragraph, until at least 90 days after the date of that increase. Eaucation Code (c) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, during the term of any contract (5) Section 5": entered into between a subdivider or builder and a school district, city, county, or city a°d (6) Chapter county, whether general law or chartered, on or before January 1, 1987, that requires tin ro ernment Co payment of a fee, charge, or dedication for the construction of school facilities as a M Chapter „4 condition to the approval of residential development, neither Section 53080 nor this �ernment Co chapter applies to that residential development (b) No public (2) Any development project for which a final map was approved and construction had i :ie blic Resc commenced on or before September 1, 1986, is subject to only the fee, charge, dedicatim ie°y approval c or other requirement prescribed in any local ordinance in existence on that date ail ; (c) This sectic applicable to the project. ! �e until the 1W (d) For purposes of Section 53080 and this chapter, "residential, commercial,or industr► {{ beuaion fails to al development" does not include any facility used exclusively for religious purposes tW 1 LX as of that c is thereby exempt from property taxation under the laws of this state, any facility used SEC. 7. Sec exclusively as a private full-time day school as described in Section 48222 of the Educ&60 65996. (a) 7-r Code, or any facility that is owned and occupied by one or more agencies of federal,aft eTimrimental e '* or local government. In addition, "commercial or industrial development" includes,but io not limited to, any hotel, inn, motel, tourist home, or other lodging for which oval or the h�miaistrative c maximum term of occupancy for guests does not exceed 30 days, but does not include aq _'000) of the P: _residential hotel, as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 50519 of t!s (1) Chapter 2: Health and Safety Code. (e) The Legislature finds and declares that the subject of the financing Of tidoll Chapter 2: _ facilities with development fees is a matter of statewide concern. For this reason a) Chapter 2: Legislature hereby occupies the subject matter of mandatory development fees and otW (4) knicle 2.: �= "Zmtion Code'requirements for school facilities finance to the exclusion of all loco measures on the subject. Section 53, 5772 Additions or changes Indicated by underline; deietions by asterisks ' ' At r STATUTES OF.1 ji91-1992 REGULAR SESSION Ch. 1354 ; ection 53080, whether by a Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to limit or prohibit the use of Chapter 2.5 reconstruction of school f (Commencing with Section 53311) of Division 2 of Title 5 to finance the construction or trges, dedications, or other reconstruction of school facilities. to Chapter 4.7 (commencing (g) This section shall remain in effect only until the date that Assembly Constitutional Aitendment 6 of the 1991-92 Regular Session fails to receive the approval of a majority )t of assessable space, in the. d:the voters voting on the measure, and as of that date this section is repealed. or this purpose, means all'o . SEC. 5. Section 65995.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: structure, not including any '65995.3. (a) In addition to the fee,charge,dedication,or other requirement specked in ached accessory structure, or'6 subdivision (b) of Section 65995, an additional fee, charge, dedication, or other require- perimeter of a residential afro` Wmt of one dollar M) per square foot of assessable space may be levied by the city or county issuing the but? governing board of a school district against that residential construction described in that city or county to calcula hs CB) and (C) of era snbparagrap paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 53080 for the mnstruction or reconstruction of school facilities. elopment, twenty-five cents;( -(p) This section shall remain in effect only until the date that Assembly Constitutional � d space. Chargeable cove Amendment 6 of the 1991-92 Regular Session fails to receive the approval of a majority snd enclosed space determined. af the voters voting on the measure, and as of that date this section is repealed. :ructure, not including any sto .SEC. 6. Section 65996 of the Government Code is amended to read: ?meat, garage, parking stru. e determination of the charg 65996. (a) The following provisions shall be the exclusive methods of mitigating commercial or industrial atru mrironmental effects related to the adequacy of school facilities when considering the :ty or county issuing the but? Wroval or the establishment of conditions for the approval of a development project, as :hat city or county. defined in Section 53080, pursuant to Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the -is (1) and (2) shall be in public Resources Code: adjustment for inflation se Chapter 22 (commencing with Section 17700) of Part 10 of the Education Code. determined by the State All . 2� Chapter 25 (commencing with Section 17785) of Part 10 of the Education Code. e effective as of the date��Q �g Chapter 28 (commencing with Section 17870) of Part 10 of the Education Code. -te amount of the district Tina n Code, as a result of the Mn i T.dn ucaArticle 2.5 (commencing with Section 39327) of Chapter 3 of Part 23 of the date of that increase. Mtion Code. Section 53080 of the Government Code. during the term of any con of district,city, county, or Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 53311) of Division 2 of Title 5 of the January 1, 1987, that req Government Code. struction of school facilities Q Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970) of Division 1 of Title 7 of the neither Section 53080 poi' Government Code. }_ �b No public agency shall, pursuant to Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)of as approved and constructie ' 0* Public Resou-:es Code or Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410) of this code, o only the fee, charge, d dmy approval of a project on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities. :e in existence on that date. a This section shall become inoperative on January 1, 1993 and shall remain inoDera- eve until the date that Assembl u nal Amendment 6 of the 1991-92 Regulaz esidential,commercial,or in ion fails to receive the approval of a majority of the—voters voting on t e measure ,sively for religious purposes —M of that date this section shall ecome operative vs of this state, any facili SEC. 7. Section 65996 is added to the Government Code, to read: in Section 48222 of the Edp, 4i996. (a) The following provisions shall be the exclusive methods of mitigating ,r more agencies of federal; - Uvironmental effects related to the adequacy of school facilities when considering the ordevelopment"includes; . ggoval or the establishment of conditions for the approval of a development project by or other lodging fora trative or legislative action pursuant to Division 13 (commencingwith Section 30 days,but does not 519. 4 00)of the Public Resources Code: ision (b) of Section 50519` (1) Chapter 22 (commencing with Section 17700) of Part 10 of the Education Code. 0) Chapter 25 (commencing with Section 17785) of Part 10 pf the Education Code. ,ject of the financing of` ie concern. For this 0) Chapter 28 (commencing with Section 17870) of Part 10 of the Education Code. .tory development fees k) Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 39327) of Chapter 3 of Part 23 of the e to the exclusion of.aD �ation Code. A Section 53080 of the Government Code. era by esferlska Additions or Changes indicated by underline; deletions by asterisks 5773 r - - Ch. 1354 _ STATUTES OF iii 1141-1992 REGUL� (6) Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 53311) of Division 2 of Title 5 of �1 The bill would spec Government Code. �t contair. desigaa;., (7) Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970) of Division 1 of Title 7 of tt The bill would prow Government Code. Ming resources or (b) No public agency shall, pursuant to Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)ot ?abbc Instruction on the Public Resources Code or Title 7 (commencing with Section 65000),deny approval of I This bill would re( project on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities, or impose conditions on ttal .4�stricts when sufficie approval of a project for the purpose of providing school facilities that exceed t5e (2) The California G amounts authorized pursuant to this chapter. ij r cts for.certain cc (c) This section shall have prospective application only, and shall not affect any action dares for making that taken by a local agency prior to the effective date of this section. -.wd to pay the costs (d) This section shall remain in effect only until the date that Assembly Constitutio procedures for ciaims Amendment 6 of the 1991-92 Regular Session fails to receive the approval of a ma' This bill would prove of the voters voting on the measure, and as of that date this section is repeals Claims Fund for costs SEC. S. Section 34 of Chapter 1209 of the Statutes of 1989 is repealed. Jt local agencies art timbursement for the: SEC. 9. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that paragraph (2) of subdivision W of Section 53080 of the Government Code and paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Sectim The people of the St 65995 of the Government Code, as amended by Chapter 1209 of the Statutes of 1989,in SECTION 1. Sectior declaratory of existing law. (b) This section shall become operative on the date that Assembly Constitutiood 51?�0.5. (a) The Leg Amendment 6 of the 1991-92 Regular Session fails to receive the approval of a majority of (1) The family is our the voters voting on the measure. an for, prepare, and t SEC. 10. Sections 1 and 2 of this act shall become operative only upon the appmW M Social research sh, of Assembly Constitutional Amendment 6 of the 1991-92 Regular Session by a tnajotiq lase of increased weifa of voters voting on the measure. criminal activity. (3) The lack of know]( usurne parental respon! Aso contribute substant; COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES--COMING-LAITY COLLEGES— M Because the state PARENTING SKILLS AND EDUCATION COURSES osociated with the disin Lod %ital interest in adec CHAPTER 1355 '3) The Legislature re( ud effective means to ed S.B. No. 1307 t �4 use the public educs i -yporunity to acquire kr A.'r ACT to add Section 51220.5 to the Education Code, relating to parenting education. ==ledge should include (Approved by Governor September 30, 1992.] 1 i1) Child development a [Filed with Secretary of State September 30, 1992.) i 2) Effective parenting. 31 Prevention of child LEGISLATIVE COn. SEL'S DIGEST {) Nutrition. SB 1307, Watson. Parenting education. 31 Household finances (1) Existing law directs the State Department of Education to grant awards, • 51 Personal and family specified, to support the implementation in school districts of education programs regs4 G) Methods to promote ing family relationships and parenting. This bill would require, commencing with the 1993-94 fiscal year, that the adop>� B Effective decisionma: course of study for grade 7 or 8 in each school district include a one-semester course 41 Family and individua parenting skills and education, as specified, thereby imposing a state-mandated lod 11 Commencing with the program. The bill would require that all pupils beginning grade 7 on or after Jul'1 a 3 shall include the equi,, 1993, be offered that course in grade 7 or 8, or both. The bill would require the Seri "cation. All pupils ente Department of Education to supply each school district that includes grade 7 or 8 � a�or its equivalent cor. sample curriculum for a course addressing parental skills, as specified. ' -fA•the State Department In addition, commencingwith the 1993-94 fiscal year, the bill would authorize corrlm� t ode ' or 8, a sample c ty colleges to offer parnting skills and education classes to interested individ nester course or for 5774 Additions or changes Indicated by underline; deletions by asterisks ' ' ' Additions or chi u ATTACHMENT "C" LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL OPINION s C - 1 ass a.. t WmMLAMIMMIM--' AMMON" - - .. �:F.X--ft Eit III= it R ='L W Z: M a A—'Aga- 11"...AJINNIM, Ir aar� - mart C ftr-- 010Ns.snra■ 1111rr Ill#11P awe Ilrw�l if�Mt�ifilf sCWft&M2M s""'11""Saco"'� Sacramento, California ism K"MMON" ;u� December 4, 1992 w...aw.. -- ad►aa... Honorable Willie L. Brown, Jr. 219 State Capitol - School Facilities Fees - 430455 Dear Mr. Brown: OURSTION NO, 1 Does Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 prohibit a city, county, or city and county from considering the adequacy of school facilities in the course of adopting or implementing a general plan, zoning ordinance, or other legislative land use policy? ' OPINION NO. 1 Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 does not prohibit a city, . county, or city and county from considering the adequacy of school facilities in the course of adopting or implementing a general plan, zoning ordinance, or other legislative land use policy. ANALYSIS NO. 1 Before assessing the effect of Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992I, we consider the existing law regarding the relationship between the development of real -property and school facilities construction. This measure is the chaptered version of Senate Bill No. 1287 of the 1991-92 Regular Session. i1G� i� X ��'L7�1 �f L.J'1r/�fV M 1 ♦ter - / - . Honorable Willis L. Brown, Jr. - p. 2 - #30455 Z. Exi tins Law Prior to January 1, 1987, development projects were potentially subject to school facilities fees or other requirements imposed by cities and counties either pursuant to Chapter 4 .7 (commencing with Station 65970) of Division 1 of Title 7 or the Government Code (hereafter "Chapter 4 .7") or pursuant to their police power generally (see Candid Inc. V. Grossmont Snion High School Dist. 1 39 Cal. 3d 878) . Where school overcrowding is demonstrated to exist, Chapter 4.7 generally. prohibits a city or county from approving a residential-± development unless it first requires, except as specified, that - land be dedicated, fees be paid, or both, for classrooms and related facilities, except as specified (secs. 65972 and 65974) . Approval of a residential development includes, for this purpose, the approval of an ordinance rezoning property to a residential use, the granting of a discretionary permit for residential use, or the approval of a tentative subdivision map for residential purposes (see Sec. 65972) . As of January 1, 1987, however, the law governing school facilities fees and other requirements was amended by Chapter 887 of the Statutes of 1986. Under that chapter, the Legislature-* added Section 53080, granting to school districts the. express authority to levy developer fees and other requirements as "a reasonable method of financing the expansion and construction- of school facilities resulting from new economic development within the district" (subd. (e) , Sec. 7 , Ch. 887 , Stats. 1986) . That authority is expressly made subject, however, to the restrictions set forth in Chapter 4 .9 (commencing with Section 65995) of Division 1 Of Title 7 (hereafter "Chapter 4 . 9" ; para. (1) , subd. (a) , See. 53080) . Included among those restrictions is Section 65995, which limits the total amount of the developer fees and other requirements to fund the construction or reconstruction of school facilities that may be levied by school districts under Section 53080, by a city or county under Chapter 4 .7 , or both, to $1. 50 per square foot of assessable space, in the case of residential development, and $0. 25 per square foot of chargeable covered and enclosed space, in the case of commercial or industrial development (subd. (b) , Sec. 65995) . Those dollar limits are increased periodically according to a designated adjustment for--inflation (para. (3) , subd. (b) , Sec. 65995) . F Z All section references are to the Government Code, unless otherwise indicated. Honorable Willie L. Brown, Jr. - p. 3 - #30455 Section 65995 also contains two provisions expressing the Legislature's intent to forbid any local legislation, except as explicitly authorized under the state laws discussed above, _ that would condition the approval of development according to the impact upon school facilities. first, subdivision (a) of section: _ 65995 prohibits the legislative body of any local agency, including the governing board of a school district (see California, 2119Ly ZndustXX, Assn, V. Governing Ad.,, 206 Cal. App. 3d 212, 224) , from levying any fee or other requirement against a development project to fund the construction or' reconstruction of school facilities except as authorized under Section 53080 or Chapter 4.7 (subd. (a) , See. 65995) . Second, subdivision (e) of Section 65995 expressly declares the intent of the Legislature to preempt local legislation that would require fees or other consideration to be paid as a condition of the approval of development. In this regard, although Section 65995 does not specifically exclude a local measure that authorizes the denial of a development project on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities, we think that the restriction placed by the Legislature upon local legislation that Would require that the impact of a development project on school facilities be -mitigated would be construed to. apply- equally to a local standard that: a development project be denied in the absence of that mitigation. A statute is to be construed so as to be given a reasonable result consistent with the legislative purpose, in light of the context of the legislation and its apparent objective (Cossack v. City = Los Angeles, 11 Cal. 3d 726, 732-733 ; see Clean A1.b ConstitgC ay v. Californid State &ti Resources BQL, 11 Cal. 3d 801, 813) . In addition to the school-related conditions upon development that may be established by local legislative action pursuant to Section 53080 or Chapter 4 .7 , a city or county generally possesses the authority to impose conditions upon the approval of a development project relative to the project's potential burden upon public services or other environmental impact concerns; this authority may be exercised under existing state law pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as set forth in Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code (hereafter "CEQA" ; see Secs. 21002 and 21002 .1, P.R. C. ; L&urAj Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City Council, 83 Cal. App. 3d 515, 521) and the Subdivision Map Act (Div. 2 - (commencing with Sec. 66410) , Title 7) . However, Section 65996, Which also is contained in chapter 4 . 9 , identifies section 53080 and other specific statutory provisions as the exclusive methods of mitigating environmental effects under CEQA with regard to conditioning the approval of a development projection the adequacy of school facilities, and prohibits any public agency from denying Honorable Willie L. Brown, Jr. : p. 4 - f30455 approval of a development project on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities pursuant to CEQA or the Subdivision Map Act. The first decision of record in Which Section 65996 was -judicially construed construed is Mira Develocmant Cam. v. City !21 $ - pieqQ, 205 Cal. App. 3d 1201 (hereafter "tea•) , a. Casa in which a . city council denied a rezoning application that was prerequisite to the approval of a proposed residential development project. In that case, the city council's decision was alleged by the developer to have been based upon the inadequacy of school facilities and, therafora, to have violated the prohibition 'sat forth in Section 65996 (tea, supra, P. 1217) . The court in .mira began its analysis by distinguishing an application for a "development project, " to which Section 65996 expressly applies, from a request for a zoning amendment. The court hold that a governmental response to an application for the approval of a development project is an adjudicative act, meaning an act that requires the application of an existing rule to a specific net of existing facts (MIXA, supra, pp. 1217-1218 ; see Landi V. County = Monterey, 139 Cal. App. 3d 934, 936) . In contrast, the court characterized a governmental response to a proposed zoning amendment as a legislative act, Which involves the formulation- of a generally applicable rule or policy •(Mi , supra, p. 1218; �i V.. County 91 Monterey, supra, p. 936)3. ra Pursuant to that distinction, the Mira court characterized section 65996 as a restriction upon only the adjudicative authority of that agency. The court refused to "broaden" the meaning of Section 65996 to include any restriction upon a public agency's authority over proposed zoning amendments or over other matters involving the agency' s exercise of its legislative powers (Mira, supra, p. 1218) . In declining to overturn the city council 's action on the basis of Section 65996 , they court did not discuss the applicability to the city council 's action of subdivision (e) of Section 65995, or of any other aspect of the preemption doctrine. Thus, the Mira decision failed to address expressly whether subdivision (e) of Section 65995 , rather than Section 65996, would be construed to preempt the city council , in the exercise of its legislative powers, from denying a rezoning application on the basis of school facilities impact. 3 As a legislative act, a zoning decision is kforded more deference than a public agency' s adjudicative decisions (Mira, supra, p. 1218 ; ArIel Development Co. v. City of Costa Mesa, 28 Cal. 3d 511 , 522) . Honorable Willie L. Brawn, Jr. - p. 5 - #30455 Subsequent judicial decisions have elaborated, however, upon the scope of Sections 65995 and 65996 in that regard. xiiiiam 5., Hart Union JL= SShQ9l Dist. .v. Rigional planning Cam,-_ _ 226 Cal. App. 3d 1612 (hereafter "Wart") , involved the refusal of - a county to consider the school facilities impact of a proposed zoning change. The court declared that subdivision (a) of Section •65995 preempts only "requirements for school finance that a local agency will impose -on a development project" (emphasis in original) . The court e3cplained that, because the local legislative decision in Hit3 did not involve requirements to be imposed on a development project, but, rather, the legislative enactment of "land-use policies" (emphasis in original) , that _ decision was not preempted by section 65995 or any other provision : of Chapter 4.9 (sae Mur•rieta Valley Unified school Dist. v. County = Riverside, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1212, 1230; hereafter "Murrieta") . Based upon that distinction, the court concluded that the county was not restricted by state law from considering school facilities impact with respect to its decision to grant or deny the proposed zoning change (Id. , pp. 1626-1627) . A similar analysis was employed in Murrieta, supra. In that case, the county approved an amendment to its general plan to ,,permit additional development to occur as a matter of land use= policy, without considering, pursuant to the requiraments of CEQA, the school facilities impact of that general plan amendment (Id;.,- pp. 1218-1219) . The court described a general plan as a "basic land use charter governing the direction of future lard use in the local jurisdiction, " and held that the amendment of a general plan is a legislative act that does not involve the approval of a "development project" for purposes of Section 65996 (Id. , pp. 1230-1231) . Further, the preemption in subdivision (e) of Section 65995 was held by the court to relate only to the financing of school facilities with development fees, "a far cry from stating that a public agency cannot include in a general plan amendment land use and development objectives and standards to mitigate the anendment ' s potential negative effects on adequacy of school facilities" (Id. , p. 1234 , fn. 16) . The court concluded, consequently, that neither subdivision (e) of Section 65995 nor Section 65996 preempts a county, when considering a general plan amendment that may adversely affect the existing condition of inadequate school facilities in a school district, from "considering and providing feasible land use and development mitigating measures" as required by CEQA. The court suggested that these measures could include, for example., the reduction of residential densities or the controlled phasing or residential development within the attendance areas of the school district having inadequate school facilities Qiurrieta, supra, p. 1234) . 4_ Honorable Willie L. Hrovn, Jr. p. 6 - #30455 The restrictions established in Chapter 4.9 have been construed by the courts, accordingly, to apply to the local imposition of conditions on the approval of individual development projects, but not to the loeal adoption or amendment of general land use policies. To summarise, Section 65995 precludes local agencies, including cities and counties, from adopting any legislative' -requirement, except to the extent authorized by Section 53080 and Chapter 4 .71 that imposes fees as a 'condition to approval of a development project in order to reduce the project/s negative impact on school facilities (see Murrieta, supra, p. 12340 fn. 16) . Section 659960 in our view, rwpiros that, in the exercise of local adjudicative authority to require under CEQA that the school facilities impact of a development project be mitigated, only the statutory remedies identified in that section may be utilized, with the result that a local governmantal agency may not employ Cr'QA to require individual development projects to otherwise mitigate school facilities as a condition of receiving approval. However, pursuant to the authority discussed above, we conclude that Chapter 4 .9 does not prohibit a city, county, or city and county from- considering the adequacy of school facilities in the course of adopting or implementing legislative land use policy in the form, for example, of a general plan or zoning ordinance. We next must determine the extent to which the changes in Chapter 4 . 9 made by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 will alter the existing law described above. II. Effect of Chaoter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 amends Sections 65995 and 65996, and adds and repeals those sections, with the effect that additional language is added to those sections, effective January 1, 1993 , but if Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 6 of the 1991-92 Regular Session fails to receive the approval of a majority of the voters voting on that measure, Sections 65995 and 65996 will revert to the versions of those sections in effect under existing law as described above. This analysis will address the changes made by Chapter 1354 of the $onorable Willie L. Brown, Jr. - p: 7 - #30455 Statutes of 1992 t� Sections 65995 and 65996 that will take effect on January 1, 1993 . We initially consider the provisions .of Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 that revise Section 65995. Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 revises subdivision (a) of Section 65995 to read as follows: 1165995. (a) Except for a fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement authorized under • Section 53080, or pursuant to Chapter 4.7 - (commeneing with Section 65970) 1 no fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement shall be levied by the legislative body of a local agency against a development project, as defined in Section 53080, whether by administrative 2X legislative action, for the construction or reconstruction of schoo facilities. * * *" (New wording indicated in underline. ) Thus, while the current provisions of Section 63995 Oprohibit cities, counties, or other local agencies from levying any Zee or other requirement, except to the extent authorized by Section 53080 and Chapter 4 .7 , as a condition to approval of a development project in order to fund the construction or reconstruction of school facilities, Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 will revise that section to specify that this prohibition applies to the levying of fees or other requirements "whether by administrative or legislative action. " Generally speaking, a legislative act is described as a governmental act that prescribes a new policy or plan; an administrative act, by comparison, is an act undertaken to carry out the legislative policies and purposes established by the legislative body (Fishman v. = = Ek12 Alto, 86 Cal. App. 3d 506, 509) . rn act is administrative, rather than legislative, it it involves, for example, the determination of specific rights under existing law with regard to a specific fact situation (Mountain Defense, LAA v. $aarQ = Synervisors, 65 Cal. App. 3d _ 723 , 728-729) . _ Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 also adds Section � 65995. 3 , which will be discussed in Analysis No. 2 . Honorable Willie L. Brown, Jr. P. 8 - #30455 Based upon that distinction, the approval of a development project, including the issuance of any permit, the granting of• zoning variances and conditional use permits, and the approval of tentative subdivision maps is considered an _ administrative act (lR&r-t, supra, p. 1625s Sandi v. County 21 Mon=', supra, p. 936) . By contrast, the approval of a zoning amendment or the amendment or a general plan is not limited in scope to a specific attempt to develop, and is characterized, therefore, as a legislative act (gam, supra, p. 1625; see Murrieta, supra, pp. 1230-1231) . Thus, Section 65995, as revised by Chapter 1354 of the statutes of 1992, will expressly prohibit a city, county, city and . county, or other local agency from either establishing legislative - standards, or applying any legislatively established standard, so as to require, as a condition of the approval of any development project, that a fee be paid or other requirement be met for the purpose of funding school facilities construction or reconstruction, other than as levied pursuant to Section 53080 or Chapter 4 .7. As discussed above, existing law already limits the exercise- of legislative authority to impose a school facilities fee or other requirement against a development project. Section 65995, in its current form, prohibits the legislative body of any local agency from establishing any requirement that a development project comply with a school facilities fee or other requirement, other than pursuant to Section 53080 or Chapter 4 .7 , and preempts the subject matter of the financing of school facilities from that source as a matter of statewide concern (subds. (a) and (e) , Sec. 65995) . Further, Section 65996 currently identities Section 53080 and other specific statutory provisions as the exclusive methods of mitigating environmental effects under CEQA with regard to conditioning the approval of a development project on the adequacy of school facilities, and prohibits any public agency from denying approval of a development project on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities pursuant to CEQA or the Subdivision Map Act. ' Consequently, while existing law limits the authority of a local agency to require that a development project provide financial mitigation of its school facilities impact in the course of the agency 's administrative implementation of Section 53080 and CEQA, the revision to Section 65995 Made by Chapter 1354 of the statutes or 1992 further prohibits a local agency from requiring that mitigation in its administrative implementation of any other legislative authority. p.lsot:orabl• Willie L. Brown, Jr. - 9 - #30435 =- We turn nart to the provisions of Chapter 1354 of tbii't - Statutas of 1992 that amend $action 65996. Section 65996,• as 4_ _ revised by chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992, reads_as :followiB: .-: •65996. 1AI The following provisions shall be the exclusive methods of iitigeting wmironmantal affects related to the adequacy of school facilities when considering the approval or the establishment of conditions for the approval of a development project by administrative 2r levislativa lion pursuant to..- Division 13 (commencing with section 21000) of the ' - Public Resources Coda: "fn} III Chapter 22 (ccamencinq with Section 17700) of Part 10 of the Education Code. "fb} 12LI Chapter 25 (commencing with Section 17785) of Part 10 of the Education Code. "*e+ 121 Chapter 28 (commencing with Section 17870) of Part 10 of the Education Code. "fd�- (4) Article 2 .5 (ccmmencing with Section 39327) of Chapter 3 of Part 23 of the Education Code. "{e} JJU Section 53080 o5 the Government Code. "{-g} 1f1 Chapter 2. 5 (co=encing with Section 53311) of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code. "+g+ LU Chapter 4 .7 (co=encing with Section 65970) of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. " (b) No public agency shall , pursuant to Division 13 (commencing with Section .21000) of the Public Resources Code or Biyiaien Title 7 (ccmmencing W= section 65000) , deny approval of a project on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities] or impose conditions oD the approval of A priect L= = P-U3M se 21 trovidinc school- facilities that exceed the amounts authorized pursuant Jo 5his ghapter. . � .t+�� t� •x i i•c r►r� xtrKtr.� �.r r tit ' r.u�� . - Ronorable Willie L. Brown, Jr. - p. 10 - #30455 41,E This won Ahall have prospective an2l ication only. And !hall = Alfr= A= actlart taken hY 3 local aaencv vrior SQ = lffactive dat& 21 this section. "SQL, This section shrill riamain J= Sfjj= only until JIM gL= that Ass mbly Constitutional Amendment 1 21 = 1991-92 R gn fails &Q XA22jyn Zhn ap2roval = a majority of the voters voting = tht measure. XId IM Q= th7at ailG thIa section I& revealed. " (Changes in wording indicated in strikeout and underline. ) We begin with the first substantive revision made to Section 65996 by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 , to the effect that the limitations set forth in that section expressly apply to local mitiqation "by administrative or legislative action" of school facilities impact pursuant to CEQA. Section 21082 of the Public Resources Code, a provision of CEQA, expressly authorizes all public agencies to adopt local legislative measures for the evaluation of projects and the preparation of environmental impact reports and negative declarations pursuant to CEQA. Consequently, this first revision to Section 65996 will specify that the restrictions set•.forth in that section apply not only to local administrative action taken under CEQA to require that a development project mitigate its impact on school facilities, but also to mitigation requirements under Cr.QA that may be imposed under local legislative measures, as may be adopted pursuant to section 21082 of the Public Resources Code. The second substantive revision to Section 65996 made by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 addresses the provision of that section that currently prohibits a public agency from denying approval of a project on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities pursuant to CEQA or the Subdivision Map Act. This revision deletes the specific reference to the Subdivision Map Act, as set forth in Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410) of Title 7, instead applying that prohibition to the exercise of local authority under Title 7 (commencing with Section 65000) .in its entirety (hereafter the "Planning and Zoning Law") . The Subdivision Map Act provides for the regulation and control of the design and improvement of subdivisions and grants power for that purpose to the legislative bodies of local agencies, including the authority to adopt ordinances to regulate the design and improvement of subdivisions (Secs . 66411, 66418 , 66419 , and 66421) . Honorable Willis L. Brown, Jr. - p. it - #30455 The Planning and Zoning Law, which includes the subdivision Map Act, also includes, for example, Chapter 3 (commencing vith section 65100) of Division i of Titla. 7, which contains various provisions governing the adoption or amendmant of _ a general, plan. Every city or county, whether chartered or general law, is required under that chapter to adopt a comprehensive, long-tore general plan, containing specific mandatory elements for the physical development of the city or county (Sacs. 65300, 65302, and 65700) . Also within the Planning and Zoning Law is Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 65800) of Division 1 of Title 71 which sets forth certain limitations upon local authority over zoning. . The *power of a city or county to zone is not granted by the Legislature, but derives from the broad "police powarsu conferred an them by section 7 of Article XI of the California Constitution (T�+�r v. City �"o+�il, 31 Cal. App. 3d 480 62, disapproved on other grounds, Associated Eome Builders etc, • 2nc, v. QUy 21 Livermore, 18 Cal. 3d 582, 596, fn. 14) and, in the case of charter cities, and cities and counties with authority over municipal affairs, from the charter (Secs. 5 and 6, Art. XI, Cal. Const. ; City yQ,g Angelas v. QA;artment 21 Eealthf 63 Cal. App. 3d 473 , 479) . Thus, this revision to Section 65996 prohibits a public agency from denying approval of a project on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities, not only when acting pursuant to the subdivision Map Act, but also when acting pursuant to other provisions of the Planning and Zoning Law, including, but not limited to, the adoption or amendment o* a general plan or zoning law. Although the adoption or amendment of a general plan or zoning law, as a legislative action, ordinarily involves the establishment of categorical land use policy rather than the approval of a development project (see Murrieta, supra, pp. 1230- 1231 ; Hart, supra, pp. 1626-1627) , the apparent effect of this revision will be to specifically prohibit the inclusion within a general plan o: zoning law of any provision that would authorize the denial of individual development projects on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities. In addition to revising Section 65996 to prohibit a public agency, pursuant to CEQA or the Planning and Zoning Law, from denying approval of a project on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities, Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 adds an express prohibition upon the imposition of conditions on the approval of a project for the purpose of providing school facilities that exceed the amounts authorized pursuant to Honorable Willie L. Brown, Jr. - p. 12 - #30455 Chapter 4.9 . Thus, Section 65996 Will specifically preclude a public agency from exercising its authority under CEQA or the Planning and Zoning Law, as discussed above, to require that school facilities fees or other requirements, in excess of the amounts •authorized under Chapter 4.9, be paid on behalf of any development project as a condition of approval. To summarize, while existing lass limits the authority of a local agency to require that a development project provide financial mitigation of its school facilities impact in the course of the agency's administrative implementation of Section 53080 and : CEQA, the revision to Section 6599S made by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 further prohibits a local agency from requiring that mitigation in its administrative implementation of any other legislative authority. The revisions made to Section 65996 made by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 specify, that the restrictions set forth in that section apply not only to local administrative action taken under CEQA to require that a development project mitigate its impact on school facilities, but also to mitigation requirementa under CEQA that may be imposed under local legislative measures, as may be adopted pursuant to Section 21082 of the Public Resources Code. In addition, those revisions specifically prohibit the inclusion within a general plan or zoning law of any provision that would authorize the denial of individual development projects on the basis of the adequacy of school facilities, and preclude a public agency from exercising its administrative or legislative authority under CEQA or the Planning and Zoning .Law, as discussed above, to require that school facilities fees or other requirements, in excess of the amounts authorized under Chapter 4 .9 , be paid on behalf of any development project as a condition of approval. The revisions made to Sections 65995 and 65996 by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 do not purport to address, however, the authority of a local agency to consider the adequacy of school facilities in any context other than the approval of individual development projects. Consequently, based upon the analysis set forth above, it is our conclusion that Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 does not prohibit a city, county, or city and county from considering the adequacy of school facilities in the course of adopting or implementing a general plan, zoning ordinance, or other legislative land use policy. Honorable Willis L. Brown, Jr. - p. 13 - #30455 s2T Alternative Construction of Chanter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 You have asked that we consider an alternative interpretation of the revisions made to Sections 65995 and 65996 by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992. This alternative argument posits that the legislative intent underlying those revisions was to revise the meaning of the term "development project, u as used in Sections 65995 and 65996, to include the legislative action of a local agency in adcptioq or amending a general plan or zoning law to establish land use policy. _ According to this argument, the effect of this construction would be that a local agency would be prohibited by those sections, as revised by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992, from taking into account the impact on school facilities in deciding on the adoption or amendment of a general plan or zoning law. As quoted above, Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 revises Section 65995 to state that, except as authorized under Section 53080 or Chapter 4 .7, "no fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement shall be levied by the legislative body of a local agency against a development project, as defined in Section 53080, whether lay administrative = legislative action. for the- construction- or reconstruction of school facilities" (emphasis - added to denote language inserted by Ch. 1354 , Stats. 1992) . To begin with, Section 65995, as revised by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 , retains from existing law the phrase "a development project, as defined in Section 53080. 11 This is inconsistent With the contention that Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 should be interpreted as a revision of the definition of the tern "development project. " More importantly, the only apparent reasonable construction of the clause "whether by administrative or legislative action" within the context of the provision of Section 65995 quoted above, in our opinion, is that the clause modifies the "levying" by a legislative body of a tee, charge, dedication, or other requirement. It is our view, as expressed in the discussion above, that "whether by administrative or legislative action" is clearly an adverbial clause in this context that addresses the methods pursuant to which that levying of fees or other requirements may occur. The alternative argument requires an interpretation that the phrase "whether by administrative or legislative action" was inserted in Section 65995 after "a development project, as defined in Section 53080" to further define "development project" to mean • any administrative or legislative action. in our opinion, it is an unreasonable construction to suggest that the noun "development Honorable Willis L. Drown, Jr. - p. 14 - i30455 project" was modified by the clause "whether by administrative or legislative actionu to express the meaning that "development project" is defined to include, for purposes of section 65995, any administrative or legislative action. Had the Legislature actually intended that result, we think it probable that the definition of "development project" in Section 53080 would have been amended or, alternatively, that a statement would have been added to Chapter 4 .9 to the effect that "development project" includes any "administrative or legislative action. " Furthermore, this alternative interpretation would result in the simultaneous combination within Section 65995 of tvo inconsistent definitions .of the term "development project." As noted above, Section 65995, as revised by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 , contains the express reference "a development project, as defined in section 53080. " Section 53080 defines "development project" to mean "any project undertaken for the purpose of development, and includes a project involving the issuance of a permit for construction or reconstruction, but not a permit to operate" (para. (2) , subd. (a) , Sec. 53080) . Although "project" is not defined by Section 53080, that term is defined elsewhere in the Planning and Zoning Law to mean "any activity involving the issuance . to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies" (Sac. 65931) .. A phrase or expression may be interpreted in accordance with its use in other related statutes (Frediani v. Qom, 215 Cal. App. 2d 127 , 133) . Therefore, for purposes o: Section 65995 , "development project" means an activity undertaken for the purpose of development that involves a public agency 's issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use. As so defined, the term "development project" has been held by the courts to exclude legislative action by a public agency involving the adoption or amendment of general plans and zoning laws (see mira, supra, p. 1218 ; Lardi V. County 21 Monterey.,, supra, p. 936) . A construction to the effect that Section 65995 purports to define "development project" as specified in Section 53080 and, simultaneously, to mean any "administrative or legislative action" of the legislative body of a local agency would thus be internally inconsistent and, consequently, unreasonable. Section 65996 is revised by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 to state that designated provisions "shall be the exclusive methods of mitigating environmental effects related to the adequacy of school facilities When considering' the approval or the establishment of conditions for the approval of a development by administrative orprojecti, Legislative action pursuant to (CEQA] " (changes in wording :Honorable Willie L. Brown, Jr. - p. 15 - #30455 indicated in strikeout and underline) . The analysis set forth above with regard to the inclusion in Section 65995 of the clause "vhother by •administrative or legislative action" also applies in this parallel content, to the affect that the clause "by administrative or legislative action" in Section 65996 may be construed reasonably, in our view, to rater only to the methods of mitigation utilized .by local agencies when considering the approvaj of a development project (see Murrieta, supra, p. 1233, fn. 15) Finally, the legal impact of defining "development project" 'in sections 65995 and 65996 to include any "administrative or legislative action" would not appear to have the alleged result of prohibiting a city or county from taking . into account the impact on school facilities in deciding on the adoption or amendment of a general plan or zoning lay. In section 65995, defining "development project" to include any administrative or legislative act would have the literal effect of prohibiting the legislative body of a local agency from levying, other than pursuant to Section 53080 or Chapter 4.7 , a school facilities fee, charg&, dedication, or other requirement against, for example, the legislative act of adopting or amending a general plan or zoning law. Similarly, in Section 65996, defining "development project" to include any administrative or legislative act would have the literal effect of restricting the mitigation requirements that may be imposed by a local agency under CEQA against its adoption or amendment of a general plan or zoning law. S The deletion by Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 of the phrase " , as defined in Section 53080, " from Section 65996 could be argued to reflect the legislative intent to revise the meaning of the term "development project, " as used in that section. The Legislature cannot be presuned to have indulged in idle acts (Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp. , 39 Cal . 2d 797 , 805 ; People v. FO , 170 Cal. App. 3d 1039 , 1056) . However, Chapter 1354 of the Statutes of 1992 does not purport to add language to Section 65996 that reasonably may be construed to replace the definition of "development project" set forth in Section 53080 . Consequently, pursuant to the rule of statutory construction that a phrase or expression may be interpreted in accordance with its use in other related statutes (Frediani v. Qta, 215 Cal. App. 2d 127 , 133) , we Conclude that "development project" would have the same meaning 'in Section 65996 - as it does in Section 65995 , which defines the term by express reference to Section 53080 and by use of the definition of the tern "project" in a related section, namely Section 65931 . Honorable Willie L. Brown, Jr. - p. 16 - #30455 It is well settled that, in construing a statute, a court may use a wide variety of extrinsic aids, such as the history of the statute, committee reports, staff bill reports, legislative debates, unpassad amendatory legislation, and even letters of legislative intent (sea SIB X1 Marriage 21 Bouquet, 16 Cal. 3d 583, 590-591; People v. Superior Court (Arthur R.L.L, 199 Cal. App. 3d 494 , 499-500) . In this case, for example, the Senate Third Reading analysis of July 30, 1992, states that " [b]y setting the fee cap as an exclusive method for mitigating school impacts when considering ' legislative' actions, [S.B. 1287] reveraas the effect of. the m.i-ra decision. " It is equally true, however, that legislative intent may be given effect only if it can reasonably be interred from the language of the act (see Coulter V. Pool, 187 Cal. 181, 185-186 ; U ;art6 Goodrich, 160 Cal. 410, 416-417 ; see also Anderson v. T .M. Jameson may, 7 Cal. 2d 60, 66-68) . In this case, for the reasons sat forth above, it is our opinion that the legislative intent suggested by the Senate Third Reading analysis, - and by the alternative argument addressed in this discussion, cannot reasonably be inferred from the language in Sections 65995 and 65996 as revised by Chapter 1254 of the Statutes of 1992 . We conclude, accordingly, that this alternative construction of those sections Would not be adopted by the courts. Donald M Perry 313 2nd Street Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 November 17, 1992 Citv Council Main Street Huntington Beach, Calif Dear Sir A short responce to "Downtown specific plan code amendment" follows. 1 agree with the idea of allowing the east side of 3rd street to join the same zoning as 2nd St., and that the requirement for 1/3rd of nv%v development be commercial. I would recommend that commercial still be allowed. In responce to the requirement for affordable horsing, I would only say that any attempt at rental or sale price control will only lead to unfairness. This is a beach area and people with money will live here if then want , even if it means paying more than an affordable price. In fact many of the condominums that have been built even at Pierside are small an uncomfortable and should be affordable. But they are not because of the demand. And my last cotrunent prefains to a rediculous requirement that buildings on PCH can be 751oot high but have only 4 stories,( floors). I believe that 7 or 8 stories should be acceptable if the ethetics of the building and parking are in order but height be 75ft or less. You people in planning want to control too much, let the owners and developers have some freedom. I air a long time resident of Huntington Beach. ' Yours truly. Donald Ni. Peru ^� Huntington Beach Company C 2124 Main Street.#200. Hunington Beach.Galitornia 92648-2499 (714)960-4351 FAX(714)374-0520 November 17, 1992 HAND DEUVERED Mike Adams, Director Community Development City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Downtown Specific Plan Code Amendment; District 1 Dear Mr. Adams, As owners of several undeveloped parcels within District 1 along Pacific Coast Highway, the Huntington Beach Company is interested in having the Downtown Specific Plan Code Amendment reflect land use conditions for this district to be similar to those being proposed for District 5, most notably allowing a 100% residential land- use option. We believe the current "Visitor Serving Commercial" land-use designation is onerous to property owners along Pacific Coast Highway when considering the type of uses allowed. We support the Staffs view that residential uses would benefit the existing and proposed commercial establishments in the Downtown-Pier area, and feel this is an opportunity to further reinforce this effort. I appreciate your consideration in this matter. Please contact me should you have any questions or if 1 can be of any assistance in your efforts. Sincer ichard Loy Project Manager cc: Howard Zelefsky - Planning Director, City of Huntington Beach C.E. Rice - Pacific Coast Homes •D►�11�.►ITS 3, q� � . 7FAM November 17, 1992 ,7 I City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Downtown Specific Plan Revisions RECOMMENDATIONS For Districts 3, 4, & 5 of DTSP Create a Density to Open Space Relationship Public Lot Size F.A_R. Open Space Up to 1/2 Block 2 X 5% 1/2 Block to Full Block 3 X 15% F.A.R. based on Net Lot Area Allow Reduction to 10% for Public Open Space on 1/2 Block to Full Block if project does not exceed F.A.R. of 2 X. Form Citizen Task Force to make recommendations on Street Closures in regards to Pedestrian and Traffic Circulation Thank you for your consideration. eff /rgsma, AIA ? , MAIN c - pc _ 7 SU ! TE A. • _ r� TI N '-: ? -DN °. = AC C A PHONE is 5 -.c . 588E FAX _ 960 3350 - RECEIVED ' Donald M Perry 313 Ind _treat DEPARTMENT OF Huntir,gtort Seac!-�, Calif, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0264 8 November 17, 1992 Planninq Commission Community Development. Huntington Beach, Calif De r - .. A s`lcr t -,e pcvrtce tc, "Crownt--Awr --peci f i c 1 nn code amendment f of i ows. I agree with the ic1A. cif allnwring thR e•tst side. of ''rd SLra--`- to join the sarne zoning 3s 2:-:c? St . , and t h iat the requ i r t for 1 1:rd of new ,level _,;_,rnErtt be would recorrd-,end that ccerierc- still be a 1 l owreH. In r pr_,rtir.,e tc `, e ^equirerrer,t fr,r &f f r da b1F hc+..isin g. .rc d ci-,1 y ;y y: th%�t any attempt o'. .'ental C';- l_. ice con-1-01 Will U:':� =: :� vc, r+="='' L t .... .c y :.it-'.;_;C.;'. ,� .yi'ti! Pe+epl e u, t"l i'alrley ,r4•. �ive there ;f they want if it: rrreans paying rr,ore than ar, afforc; :,le price. In fact many o4 F ' _ _: r,dco,inurt< that `-iave bee-t `u i l t ever; ` ,'ars•ide are wall an un :: : ~1 r,.-r .=-rr�u"�c be affordable_ But _.._y are not LxEc4use of the And rr. last cc�Trrrier.t i:r,-t.a-ins to a r•e+diculous requirement buildings on PC-;. can be 75foct high but `-Gave cx-t1y 4 to:-•ic-s. floors' I bet ieve that Or 0, �:;Zr _.r�ulu vE Cf:i.c, ri';r_ +.1C� _-•t' build-Ing, and E.zr-•h-ing are -H-^ order but -e-"ght be 75ft or 1= .:... You pei:;.Ce in pl-T.n-ii`ig want �r't. the and developers have some f reedorrr. I am a long time resident of Hur;t.ington Beach. Yours truly, Donald M. Perry 4 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 20451 Craimer Lane P.O. Box 71 Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)964-8888 0 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Brian Garland President Shirley Carey November 17, 1992 Clerk Robert Mann, Ed.D. Member Gary Nelson, D.D.S. Member Karen O'Bric Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission Member City of Huntington Beach ADMINISTRATION 2000 Main Street, 4th Floor Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Duane A. n ,Ed. D. Superintendent Dear Chairperson and Members: �asmussen. Ed. D. The Huntington Beach City School District("District")recommends that the �"nt Superintendent Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach add a condition of i-ersonnei/Educational approval to the Downtown Specific Plan ("Specific Plan )in accordance with the Services approval of the Downtown Specific Plan Code Amendment 'Willage Concept" Jerry Buchanan and Downtown Parking Master Plan("Amendment") to ensure that impacts on the Assistant Superintendent Business Services District are adequately mitigated. The condition proposed by City Staff for the Coultrup Project (Tentative Tract 14666,etc.) is acceptable to the District and is as follows: "Prior to the issuance of any building permit,the developer shall enter into a school facilities impact mitigation and reimbursement agreement with the appropriate school district(s) for K-12. This condition may be waived by the appropriate school district." Without such a condition of approval, the District would be opposed to the Amendment. The 1,000 to 1,200 housing units allowed by the Amendment would generate 270 to 323 additional students for the District. The District has previously shown that it does not have the facilities nor resources to accommodate additional students and that statutory fees are not sufficient to adequately mitigate the impact of such students. ATTACHMENT NO. -�D Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission City of Huntington Beach November 17, 1992 Page 2 The Staff Report for the Amendment notes that Environmental Impact Report No. 82-I("EIR 82-I") was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the Specific Plan. As the District has shown on previous projects, including the Coultrup Project, the environmental setting concerning school funding has changed substantially in the past few years; therefore, any environmental evaluation of school issues contained in EIR 824 is inadequate. Thank you for your consideration and assistance Sincerely, Jerry S. Buchanan Assistant Superintendent Business Services HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT cc: Mr. Michael T. Uberuaga,City Administrator Mr. Mike Adams,Director of Community Development Mr. Howard Zelefski, Planning Director City of Huntington Beach Mr. John C. Hutt,Associate Community Systems Associates,Inc. i ATTACHMENT "A" TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION The Huntington Beach City School District ("District") does hereby oppose and object to any action of the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach to approve Downtown Specific Plan Code Amendmentl'vllage Concept" and Downtown Parking Master Plan ("Amendment") as proposed. The District objects to the Amendment for the following reasons: 1) The proposed Amendment will result in a significant adverse impact on the District which will not be adequately mitigated. 2) The Amendment is not in compliance with the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach as required by State and City Laws; 3) Environmental Impact Report No. 82-1 i,%inadequate in its evaluation of impacts of the Amendment on schools. The District's positions are further detailed and substantiated in this attachment. Therefore, the District recommends that the Planning Commission: Deny the Amendment. or, Continue the Amendment to allow for the preparation of adequate environmental documentation which thoroughly and accurately assesses the Impact of the proposed project on the District, and provides for mitigation measures which reduce the impact of the project on the District to a level of insignificance. or, if the applicant desires approval at this time, Inclusion of the DistricCs recommended condition of approval, or the City Stafrs recommended condition of approval on the Coultrup Project(Tentative Tract No. 14666, etc.), both set forth as follows, which would protect the District's interests and allow for future school impact and mitigation analyses: A- I • District's recommended condition of approval: "Prior to the recordation of the final tract map and/or the receipt of a certificate of compliance from the City of Huntington Beach, the owner of record of the real property shall enter into a school facilities Impact Mitigation and Reimbursement Agreement with the Huntington Beach City School District or shall have said condition waived by the Board of Trustees of the District. Said Agreement shall provide for the adequate mitigation of impacts on the District by providing adequate funding of school facilities necessary to serve the student population generated by the development of said tract" City Staffs recommended condition of approval: "Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the developer shall enter into a school- facilities impact mitigation and reimbursement agreement with the appropriate school district(s) for K-12. This condition may be waived by the appropriate school district." We request that this letter and attachment, as well as any previous District correspondence concerning the Amendment or Downtown Specific Plan, be placed into the public record of the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach relative to Its consideration of the Amendment. Impact Analysis Based upon the estimate of 1,000 to 1,200 additional housing units that could be developed as stated in the Staff Report, the Amendment could generate 270 to 323 additional students for the District. In order to accommodate these students, the District would have to expend $6,601,912 to $7,922,294 in capital facilities acquisitions and improvements, or approximately $6,602 per housing unit. This cost estimate is based upon the construction of new school facilities on land acquired for the project, and represents the full impact of the Amendment on the District. The District is currently preparing a Capital Facilities Strategic Master Plan and Asset Management Program ("Master Plan") which will contain projections of future student enrollments and analyze the District's facilities inventory and needs, in order to best utilize such facilities. The Draft Master Plan projects increases in enrollment for the next ten years, with a total K-8 enrollment of 8,204 by school year 2002-03. The Draft Master Plan projects a total K-8 enrollment of 8,636 at mid4ntensity buildout Therefore, the students generated by the Amendment will impact the District even if they matriculate over an extended timeframe. A - 2 ' In order to house the projected increased student enrollments, the Draft Master Plan Contains a preliminary school facilities development program. This program calls for the rehabilitation of and expansion of existing schools, the reopening of two of the Districts dosed sites, and the acquisition and development of three new schools (two schools in addition to the Holly-Seacliff school). The total cost of this development program in 1992 dollars Is estimated to be $56,350,000. The resulting cost to the District per additional housing unit would be approximately$4,612, (based upon 12,219 housing units projected to be developed within the District by mid-intensity buildout). Applying the cost per housing unit to the Amendments potential 1,000 to 1,200 additional housing units would result in an impact on the District of $4,611,670 to $5,534,004. Comparison of Cost Estimates Full Impact Preliminary Development Program Cost per Housing Unit $6,601.91 $4,611.67 Total Impact (1,000 HU) $6,6M,612 $4,611,670 Total Impact (1,200 HU) $7,922,294 $5,534,004 Senate Bill No. 1287, which was recently signed by the Governor and will go into effect January 1, 1993, authorizes school districts to levy development fees higher than currently allowed by law. Assuming a similar percentage division of fees with the Huntington Beach Union High School District, the Huntington Beach City District would be able to charge $1.6166 per square foot of residential development compared to the current $1.0065. However, this Increased fee level would become inoperative if the voters reject Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 6 in June of 1994. Based upon an average housing unit size of 1,600 square feet, the District would receive from $1,610,400 to $1,932,480 at existing fee levels and from $2,586,400 to $3,103,680 at SB 1287 fee levels. Under either fee schedule the mitigation would be much less that the impact of the buildout of the Downtown Specific Plan allowed with the Amendment on the District A -3 ' Comparison Net Impact Estimates 1,000 Housing Units Full Impact Current Fee Level SIB 1287 Fee Level [Net tal Project Impact $6,601,912 $6,601,912 evelopment Fees $1,610,400 $2.586,400 Impact on District $4,991,512 $4,015,512 _j Comparison Net Impact Estimates 1,000 Housing Units Preliminary Development Program Current Fee Level SB 1287 Fee Level Total Project Impact $4,611,670 $4,811,670 Development Fees $1,610,400 $2,586,400 Net Impact on District $3,001,270 $2,025.270 As shown in the above charts, the mitigation the District is proposed to receive through development fees does not reduce the impact of the proposed buildout of the Downtown Specific Plan allowed with the Amendment to a level of insignificance. This is true even with the increased fee levels and for cost estimates based on the District's Preliminary Development Program as well as full impact cost estimates. The impact on the District of the development of 1,200 housing units is even greater. Failure to Comply with the Huntington Beach General Plan Section 65464 of the Government Code states that a specific plan must be in compliance with the general plan. § 664". Plan consistency No specific plan may be adopted or amended unless the proposed plan or amendment is consistent with the general plan. A -4 Further the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach requires zoning be consistent with all elements of the General Plan, as noted in Section 4: Zoning and General Plan Consistency: 4.2 Finding of Consistency A finding of consistency may only be made after analysis of the proposed zoning in terms of all nine elements of the General Plan. A finding of consistency with only one of the elements, such as the Land Use Element, is not sufficient for a finding of consistency with the General Plan. After considering all nine elements, a finding of consistency with the General Plan may be made for the zoning proposal in question if it can be shown to further or possess a measure of significant degree of compatibility with the General Plan and policies and programs. In order for the Planning Commission to approve the Amendment, it must find that the Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. Though the Amendment may be in compliance with some of the goals and policies of the General Plan, it does not possess a measure of significant degree of compatibility. The Land Use Element of the General Plan sets forth the following goals and policies, In part 3.4.2.5 Housing To provide and maintain a quality living environment so that members of all economic, social, and ethnic groups may reside in Huntington Beach_ by: 1. Providing a variety of housing types in all areas of the City. 2. Providing an adequate level of community services facilities improvements and maintenance in all areas of the City. 3.42.6 Community Facilities To ensure a full range of community facilities that provide for the general public's health, safety and welfare by: 1. Providing utility systems to meet proiected demands. 2. Providing meeting centers for civic and other groups. 3. Providing efficient, economical refuse disposal. A - 5 4. Encouraging the proper location and planning of facirities such as churches, nursing homes, day care centers, well-baby clinics, etc. 5. Encouraging the location of municipal, county, state, federal, and other governmental facilities within or near the Civic Center. [emphasis added] Further. the Community Facilities element of the General Plan states, in part: 3.5.6 Policies This section presents the City's policies regarding the provision of community facilities. Implementation of these policies will occur primarily through the implementation of the City's capital improvement program. Additional implementing actions will be required, however, such as preparation of feasibility studies, revision of standards, and increased coordination with other entities. 3.5.6.1 Adequacy of Facilities Thls Element has identified a number of deficiencies in the City's existing community facilities systems. Additional deficiencies may be expected to occur when the his developed jo ultimate buildout under the General Plan unless corrective actions are taken. The following policies state the City's intent to correct existing deficiencies where funding permits and to ensure that new development is adequately served. 1. Promote the provision of adequate community facilities within the City of Huntington Beach. 2. Pursue funding for projects to correct existing deficiencies in community facility systems. 3. Prior to issuance of a development entitlement. the City shall stake the finding that adequate services can be provided to serve the proposed development, consistent with policies contained in the plan, at the time of occupancy. 4. Prior to constructing new community facilities, consider the impact of those facilities on annual maintenance and operating costs and staffing requirements for maintenance. [emphasis added] The goals of the Growth Management Element are: 4.0 Goals and Objectives The goals of this element are to: A - 6 `• 1. Reduce traffic congestion; and - 2. Ensure that adequate transportation and public facilities and public services are provided for ebsting and future residents of the City. [emphasis added] The Growth Management Element defines public facilities and services as: Public Facilities and Services - For the purposes of this Element, public facilities and services are defined as, but not limited to, police, fire, parks, drainage, water, sewers, and schools. The Costal Element states that "A prerequisite to any development in the costal zone is the:provision of adequate community facilities." It goes on to state, in part: 1. Promote the provision of adequate community facilities within the costal zone. a. Prior to issuance of a development entitlement, the City shall make the finding that adequate services(i.e., water, sewer,roads,etc.)can be provided to serve the proposed development, consistent with policies contained in the plan, at the time of occupancy. Clearly the provision of community facilities, including schools, is a high priority in the General Plan. Further, the General Plan requires proposed developments to provide adequate community facilities needed to accommodate that development As detailed in this attachment, the Amendment will generate additional students which the District does not have the capacity to house. The Amendment will result in an impact on the District significantly greater than the proposed mitigation of that impact. The net result of the Amendment will be the further overcrowding of school facilities. Therefore, it cannot be stated that an adequate level of community facilities(i.e., schools), is available or will be provided to most the requirements of these application. Without adequate mitigation measures to provide the required community facilities, the Amendment cannot be found to be in compliance with the General Plan. Inadequacy of the Environmental Documentation The District believes that Environmental Impact Report No. 82-1 does not comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") or the CEQA Guidelines, because it is inadequate in its evaluation of Impacts of the proposed Amendment. The City should prepare adequate environmental documentation which thoroughly and accurately assesses the impact of the proposed project on the District, and provides for mitigation measures which reduce the impact of the buildout of the A - 7 Downtown Spec Plan allowed with the Amendment on the District to a level of insignifi- cance Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines states, in part: g 15162. Subsequent EIR (a) Where an EIR or Negative Declaration has been prepared, no additional EIR need be prepared unless: (1) Subsequent changes are proposed in the proiect which will require important revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts not considered in a previous EIR or Negative Declaration on the project; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project Is undertaken, such as a substantial deterioration in the air quality where the project will be located, which will require Important revisions in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the Involvement of new significant environmental impacts not covered in a previous EIR or Negative Declaration; or (3) New information of substantial,importance to the project becomes available, and (A) The information was not known and could not have been known at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, and (9) The new information shows any of the following: 1. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed previously in the EIR: 2. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; 3. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fad be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project; or 4. Mitigation measures or alternatives which were not previously considered In the EIR would substantially lessen one or more significant effects on the environment. A -8 `. (b) If the EIR or Negative Declaration has been completed by the project has not yet been approved, the Lead Agency shall prepare or cause to prepared the subsequent EIR before approving the project [emphasis added] The environmental setting has changed since the certification of EIR 82-1. The current local and statewide school facilities financing crisis is far more grave than it was in 1982 when the original EIR was prepared. As detailed in the District's previous communications to the City of Huntington Beach, the District is overcrowded and does not have the ability to accommodate additional students. The proposed Amendment will result in a significant impact on the District which will not be adequately mitigated through development fees. This should be evaluated in the environmental documentation for the Amendment. dr A + 1 RECEIVED (\ jV 1 Donald M Perry 313 2nd Street DEPARTMENT OF Huntington Beach, Calif. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 92648 November 17, 1992 Planning Commiss!a^ Community Develo4:�ant Huntington Beach. -Dear Sir A short responce Towntowr specific plan code amendment" follows. I agree with th; of allowing the east side of 3rd street to join the same zoning and that the requirement for 1 j3rd of new development be c•a-:-->--r_7.;-i1=;, . I would recommend that commercial still be a 11-awec!. In respa-ice tc r'-= -equirerrrent for affordable housing, I would only say that any after::;•* or- a•-Ile price control will only lead tc• _;nfai I I-) - ' ,-: =,e,= .=nel. pec-s le with money -will live here ;f they wart if it means paring more than an affordable price. 0 In fact :many c-- cfCaninur;>c t!x-zt ^ave been built e.r_' . at ^Ier-ide are small cur-: u-. : `.:'; ari: :-!-:(:.)uld be affordable. But they are not �iecause of the . And my last to a rediculous requirement that buildings on PCH cc;n be 75-1:- high !--)ut `-gave only 4 storie4s ( floor_ ) . I believe that ? or 8 stor'_ i ; building e and perking are ': F;^ !ar.rt c�!:` be 75ft or lees. You people in pl,:.r- - g want tcx) ntrch, let t!-te: _-xners and developers have freedrxr:. I am a long time r-a_'dent of L Uritington Reach. Yours truly, Donald M. Perry , • z 19 To : Huntington Beach , Planning Commission -2crt. of From : Property Owners of Lots 6 , 12 , 14 , 18 in Block 101 ( Between Lake and 2nd . and PCH and Walnut) Date : November 16 , 1992 Subject : Opposition to the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendments The enclosed comments are strictly for the above area of concern , that of Block 101 , as described in the Downtown Specific Plan as being a part of District #3 . Section4 . 5 . 01 . d requires that , " Visitor serving commercial uses must be a part of all development proposed in this District with a minimum requirement that the entire street level , and at least 1 / 3 of the total floor area be devoted to visitor-serving commercial uses . " This is not an appropriate use for the property in Block 101 . The approval to allow the Pier Colony to be bui It without incorporating any visitor - serving commercial , has in effect isolated Block 101 from the other portions of commercial services along PCH . The commercial foot traffic to this area has been cut- off by the Pier Colony residential frontage along PCH and vehicular business - serving is undermined by the lack of available parking . This city has already seen disastrous _results in attempting to combine retail services and residential housing . The requirement to include " commercial " will not allow for the profitable development of properties facing Walnut or 2nd Street . Recommendation : A "mixed use " proposal for development would provide for residential use especially along 2nd , Walnut and Lake where retail is not feasible. Section 4 . 5 . 01 . a requires , " Residential uses shall only be permit—if the deve1opment includes consolidation of a one- block or greater area . " Block 101 should be exempted from this requirement . Presently , this Block is comprised of both business -serving ',commercial and residential . Under seperate private ownership , the relationships of these two seperate functions can co-exist . The necessity to consolidate into a "block " to provide residential housing , or the requirement to build commercial along with residential is stagnating our abilities as homeowners and business persons to develop our property. 0000 Recommendation : "Mixed use" , with business - serving deleted from any eve opment along 2nd , Walnut and Lake Streets . Section 4 .5 .04 Height requirement . The original Downtown Specific Plan allowed 8 stories of building for any one full block southeast of Main Street. At the time of the Plan , it was argued that any development less -han 8 stories , and having to include on sight parking would not be profitable to a developer . This Plan also considered the environmental impacts and traffic that would result and identified that 8 stories of development scaled down from 12 was the best use of the coastal area . As property ownwers , we have looked to the current Downtown Specific Plan as the guideline for the future development of our property . The proposed downscaling of our building potential from what the city has already directed will reduce our property values by 50% . The adjacent Pierside Colony already exceeds 8 stories ( in height ) , and for Block 101 , there is no fundamental reason to again scale back this plan . Recommendation : Block 101 , full block , 8 stories - 82 ft . Section 4 . 5 .08 Requires a ROW dedication to widen the alley to 30 feet . Recommendation : Block 101 should be exempted from this . The present alley is not even necessary , and rarely maintained by the City . Section 4 . 5 .09 Upper Story Setback - Recommendation : Delete the 25 foot set back for all stories above the second . S On November 12 , 1992 , a meeting was held with Mr . Mike Adams for the property owners that will be affected by the proposed Downtown Specific Plan changes . One property owner asked Mr . Adams why the City was rewriting the Plan that was adopted only ten years ago , and designed to lead the City ,for the next 50 years . Mr . Adams stated , " WE ARE CHANGING THE RULES . " With this in mind , is there any intregrity to your plans ? • DtGf)e IC SOUTHRIDGE HOMES October 9 , 1992 Mr . Mike Adams City .of Huntington Beach 2006 Main Street Huntington Beach , California 92648 Reference : Huntington Beach Downtown Specific Plan Code Amendment Dear Mike : Pursuant to the Town Hall meeting on Thursday , October 8 , 1992 regarding the proposed code changes in the Downtown Specific Plan , I would like to re-cap my company ' s suggestions . Southridge Homes has been primarily active throughout the 1980s in Areas I and II which extend from 6th Street to Goldenwest Street , Walnut Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway . Area I is zoned for a combination of commercial and residential . As a landowner of a half block between .16th Street and 17th Street on Pacific Coast Highway , Southridge Homes would like to see the zone reflect and "and/or" reflecting the use to be : a . all commercial , b . a combination of commercial and residential (current zoning) , or C . all residential . The density of the residential should reflect the current density of Area II which allows up to thirty-five units per gross acre . This would be compatible with other developed blocks in the area . _ Area II is zoned for residential only . Staff ' s suggestion of allowing single family dwellings to be built is great . There are many small lots left to be built which Cannot be con- solidated due to adjacent properties already built out . Staff ' s suggestion would facilitate the build-out of these small parcels . 5362 Oceanus Drive, Suite A, Huntington Beach. CA 92649 • (714) B93-71 1 1 FAX (714) 373-1053 CA ST LIC 4B4135 19 As for changing the density in Area II to twenty-five units per acre : Southridge Homes is opposed . The current zoning , encourag- ing lot consolidation , has worked well through the years . Without this incentive , I doubt we would see as many projects built to date . I suggest we leave this issue alone . It has worked well in the past , and has produced many wonderful projects which have cleaned up Pacific Coast Highway substantially . As Southridge Homes has not been active in any other area of the Downtown Specific Plan , we will not be commenting on them EXCEPT for the issue of parking . It is the suggestion of Southridge Homes to eliminate all on street parking in ALL of the Downtown areas including the Old Town area up to Palm Street . This would force visitors to use the existing parking structures and/or meters . It would also alleviate the burden on existing home owners of having "strangers" parking in front of their homes at all hours of the day and night . I would suggest that for a small fee the homeowners can have a parking sticker for their use and a guest pass to put on their visitors ' cars for temporary parking . This would bring added revenue to the City , alleviate parking problems in residential areas and encourage visitors to use existing parking facilities . I hope these suggestions help your staff in the final determination of this code amendment . Sincerely , SOUTHRDIGE- HGMES Ric�ard P . Kelter RPK/bh i m f b4 . . ........ ........... S, 41e 09f22.92 12*02 'C714 $91 5914 Rank Video GG w Memo Rank Video Services A.rn.ericE To NB Planning Commissioners Daze 22 September 1992 Dianne Easterling Subject DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN CODE AMENDMENT, VILLAGE CONCEPT & DOWNTOWN MASTER PARKING PLAN Dear Commissioner_ In regard to the special Planning Commission meeting being held tonight at 5:30pm, the only agenda item that being noted above, I respectfully request your vote to defer this item to a later date. This request is being made for a number of reasons, the main one being the inappropriate method being taken to resolve or decide an issueof such import to this City, and in particular the downtown, i.e., the 5:30pm meeting time which disallows most citizens to attend, plus the insufficient public review period of the documentation. -Thank-you\for your consideration DiarmA E sterling 203 - Sth Street DISTRIBUTE TO: Commissioner Kenneth Bourguignon Commissioner Shirley Detloff Commissioner Commissioner Philip Inglee , Commissioner Victor Leipzig Commissioner Susie Newman Commissioner Roy Richardson Commissioner Jan Shomaker f Main--Pier Redevelopment Master Plan City of Huntington Beach, California 3D/International September 1986 .I I PIN, MR I(Mn ttK;1l.W 14-.Al.'II MASM-A MAN .ter 5r I � ( � 1 r.�'• , . �ti r, •r-r� r 4 1j � -- `/r>- •'�Y4(r �i'�j41�� * � � 4:�i it f(r �,ti�tiiyy fi, 41, l tit )>f� v $ doiy� cz !I a 1,�,.0 'S?• � _ fl �V �� r To iftv s, -yam _M �• r ry.. !K� i r Ct.P~• ►. -�.. �..-7;=��r i.. i t:f�i� •o���Wasson an 0 @name. �• - Aa is �`• � 1 � F M Nm (�117:�iSum i-i11i�SSw�:D1?9 rc•R`atif rSr a M i ff1��flffl/fIf NI/f11/f1f11Q fdlf11f1 �r `� I , •� r r r IMP !� SY•�• i i � 'L - �� 1!� � ' r '� ' I •.�T-'' �iY .yam -art. �� �� , dt� �� t � • 'tit !�, � 1��' yt� ZU n 1 III -j �If << - .r -�' •^ •r�; " <7 _, I r '� i rs 'i p�r,+X1 ,}` � i.`+ . �.w r at ./•- j .1 ! �' 6a.>i.. 1 �. ; 1' .v. i. .• �w 2 r S r :a ,'sfS>. ^5' 'e. :.y„'1�'�0- � � 1 .r..4.r,-IL - .Ln, :.l.i.7,1r.., '.i f �'l1: ..t!{• i Y. �'t.,j;�..- _ - pip ._l�• t �-`:} yJ 1 V;i+.'uo - . t +��..L ^t a y -C rti„ .. - c'ti-'{;•'� �,•q Aj _1 j u? q ?"iZ iwl�I •?- •s z `. L�r~`jl 1 G •I, �- ���� { TIC �- _ (I r -t'4 W ..rr t MOOL , -j� CR,. 'a?1`1S; l ��-.�,��,, r h � ��,� ir'' 1 ♦rn.r ���8�/�.is •. .•'.. �_�j �'ff•, .:. 1:11e"D-hX:uJ ..a1�`:...C..,.. .... '°�-� , 1 �.i: ��• . � J.@ i, j,�� � �t�� 1 . � ..� � ,i.�•..c'�:.:�...�� .. �n 1. ...i.ate,.. f� •�1,' .. yr' r .',i ' - ;. 1.� • _ l �y Wit , •� ,1` 'gip T� 3• •. — � pia t r��1',•��_� ter,. G ! 7 M ,{f: C i•, .1 �75,{ ll• i. �1 ?�".:Y`+ ��tt�.l�l i y� r r•�t. .. p'r;{w;L) i,:Sj. 'C.'Z 4° ..r:y. ... ifI �- .-�+: 'a � •+,�' � '•7�d µ+•Olf:�•`./ o,.+.1�,t �� ;';:p rt.i. f J� �<`. � �� .{ :1.;1:: "• •.J��t;4•,.F i( G ' - :1-.,,[,N•r',•+'1+7. 4, .1.� .>• fl I I .�} en�.. +•n:( >i .,^„•: .;d, a - r .- .%���.'� - +�f..,. :'ti',..,<.� ..Ts� �j+�,.,..-Fr;p_p,J•:, LC�•yY N.l` ?' •ti,. I {)t..`: ". ! r r _1 a h p.`•�- -r �• w,3: -� Y -� r. •� + � 1:::i k ;:+1s1'.r� •I r ' .J�r;.l�:�;�,5,t•a%rh�q �> ✓ {.J, lr'r,y.�{el :.r� S'Y I � I S •+�tv;4 � .�• ' ( r! -ry F ���,.. r .�. �•ij-•(yr•.1•. 1 _lr,ty ( I ,:�, ( I- I+ r r>'i e�r-1'•' t r : t 1 Residential _ !"o(/ OO�.I;j J•� ®Commercial.Orfcc Civic Building OParking Slruciurc \ b. �• �� o ; ` Qo art {: ` -�} - f.t• .4c{.'. "i a8 O Off •, , L v`d'C' m f' Op Ma fCAR ,L'JD 'C❑I �� :C30 so MCI) AW its ..,�. -=-- - !/ll lltl !.'t/! !!!���--I/t t t tJr•� //�.•!r:• //! .;�.•.�. C� _ �v - :-a - b�•L OL �■yyq] _`% ..rya N �`'� :. .(' � _J• � '' � � II -- \ __ - .. _.._il�_��� . .,� .. . _ - -......................:�'. :---------- 6\, ..-- .�i'' ... Jh�tt,�'✓rJs�'J.'S�YT'�^��.:' �^'�'��1.tiSLN . J'�'77T:T.:!�",",'Tlyy�C'�u �-1'tt7l,'fT3Tt:tt�J,�t.7.'•."f}Y,•ltlit �,V.•l!!✓t11t.•.t•,S:V •JV- - HUN-nNGTON BEACH MASTER PLAN CONI'IERCIAL DEVELOPMENT -Total Office Commercial Cars 5 1. 12 ,000 SF 1 1 ,000 SF 125,000 SF 700 3. 106,000 SF 1 ,000 SF 106,000 SF 1000 12 4. 12,000 SF 650 5 96• ,000 SF 72,000 SF ,000 SF 75 24,000 SF 0 _ 6. 109,000 SF 82,000 SF 27,000 SF 35 350 7. 93,000 SF 63,000 SF 30,000 SF 8. 45,000 SF 32 000 SF 370 s` 13 9. 106000 SF 7$ ,000 SF 165 , ,000 SF 28,000 SF 400 10. 34,000 SF 34,000 SF 11. 115,000 SF 85,000 SF 200 30,000 SF 430 12. 25,000 SF 25,000 SF 13. 30,000 SF 15,000 SF 160 14. 5.000 SF 15,000 SF 140 .`f 5,000 SF ,0 J 1.063,000 SF 427,000 SF 636,000 SF 5100 = ¢�~ �r_- _. :.,__._' -�� ••..-.-ems-`_ l�• •' - •• �\\�\ _ - .. - - '- � ♦fir -_ � _ �� � -__� ��• :.•`i'_-.�r� •.J II tea.=_.. ._� -.--.- . - - �� t i.. _-_ r.�sy ru-mil__--Z •�. � ` C�Z \- ti. �- ... • •1,_ . .:fir � ter-' � - \ - ''� `�.., ---._____ t __--. - - _` ,\•.'a.�-y _j -0 CCU`J. *,t _ Downtown Redevelopment Commercial and Office Space RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 1• 260 DU 2• 32 DU \ 3. 34 DU 4• 64 DU 5. >' 6. 10 DU 7. 48 DU ✓ 8. 48 DU 9. 60 DU 10. M DU 12. 70 DU t y . 2� 13. 60 DU 14. 50 DU 15. 60 DU 6. 00 DU 17. 60 DU `. .. 18. 60 DU 1060 DU ... .... . ..'.,�.. ... ....'.1. . ..',.lT.` ... . .. .. ... - ..:. •..... .... ..a' •• ..•.{•. .... _ Downtown Redevelopment Residential Dwelling Units PROJECTED SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT 0 USE OC%NTOWN EXISTING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT E.I.R. PLAN (1966) E,I.R MODIFIED DOWHTOMN G.P. UPDATE UPDATE RECOmENDED MAX. RECOMMENDED DEV. DISTRICT MAX.BUILAOUT BUILDOUT CONCEPT' 1995 1988 1 '. i COMMERCIAL 1 15,000 of 101,075 of 63,378 or 60.000 of 60,000 of 45,000 or 45,000 of 11) 45,000 of (1) MOTEL - - - - - 54 rate 54 rain 11) 54 r.a (1) RESIDENTIAL - - IQ units 150 units - - OU OU COMMERCIAL 2 10,000 of - - - -NUT EL 45 rato - - - - - RESIOENTIA( 150 unit• 1023 unit• 870 units 1000 units BDO unit• 500 Units 60f1 OU (1) 5D0 OU 11) ComMEPCIAL 3 86,DD0 of 4AO,328 sf 150,545 of 8D,DOO or 50,ODO of 240,000 of 280,000 of (3) (B) 280,000 of (3) (0) MOTEL - - - 800 rain 850 r.a 520 rate 700 r.e 600 rat■ OFFICE - 4AO,328 of 120,548 of 20,000 or 25,ODO of - FtESIOENTIAL 35 unit• 696 units 431 units 400 units 200 unit* 275 units 275 OU 260 DU MULTI PURPOSE - - - i00,000 of - CDMMEICIAL + - 273.368 of 182.382 or 50,000 of - - - 13,000 of 13,000 of OFFICE - 273,368 of 104,194 of - 50,000 of - 32,000 of 32,000 of RESIOEN71AI 50 unit• 882 units 330 ..It. 100 units 150 unit• 300 unita 200 OU 150 OU COwEFCIAL 5 111,000 of 338.038 of 208,324 of 150,000 of 75,000 01 12O,DDD of i8D,OD0 of 173.000 of OFFICE 35.000 of 338.036 of 208,324 of 75,000 of 60,000 of 60,000 of 44S,000 of 380,000 of RESIDENIAL 50 unit• 640 units 204 units 200 units 109 unito 200 units COMMERCIAL - 43,000 of 542,404 of 241,444 of 130,000 of MOOD If 83,000 of 60,000 of (4) 55,000 of (4) fFF10E 40,000 of - - 75,000 of 45,000 of 40,00D of 360 OU 360 DU MESIDEMTIAL 20 units 497 unit• 497 units 200 unit• 375 unit* 450 unit• COMMEFCIAL MOOD of 575,863 of 230,345 of 60,000 of 50.000 of 25,000 of MOTEL 5O rate - - 400 rw* ADO ..* 200 rats 600 rwa 500 rate mt;SIFU„ - - - - - i0D,o00 of 18,000 of 120,000 of CO+MEr[IAL -A - _ _ _ _ 10,000 of 5,000 of RESIDEN71AL - - - - - - 168 OU - CONvENT. rIA. - - - - - - 280,000 of 200,000 of OIL U71L. 35 P...1+r PESIOENTIAL =^ 169 units 1888 units 1888 unit• 1800 units 1600 ..Its 1250 ..-to 9OU D'J 900 OU (1) CV4'EICIAL - - 250,DDO or 250,000 of 50,000 of 5D.D00 of 80,000 of 80,000 of 11) 80,000 or (1) MOTEL 144 rw. 400 ram 400 r.a ADD rain 400 r.. 800 rain BOO r.o 800 r..s RESIDENTIAL 80 unit• - - - - - Co."EFCIAL •'3 18,000 of - - 75,000 of 90,000 .1 105.000 of 125,000 of 17) 125,000 of (71 REV, - - - - 100,D00 of (incl. Wet) COMMERCIAL 1, 7,000 of - - 25,000 of 25,ODO of 25.000 of 10,000 of 7.000 of PESIOENTIAL 108 unit* - - - - Ice OU 106 OU IU14 COMMERCIAL 297,500 of 2,521,874 of 1,358,389 of 870,000 of 490,000 of /23,000 of 803,000 of 703,000 sr MOTEL 239 gee - - 1600 Rat 1650 )wt 1574 fv,* 2154 neat 1954 Fi RESIDEMT IAL 850 Units 6304 Units 4631 Units 3850 Units 3234 Unit* 2975 Units 2580 DU 2206 OU OFFICE 75,000 of 1,052,732 or 683,084 of 17D,DD0 of 170,000 of 100,000 of 507,000 of 432.000 of MUSEUM _ - - - - - 180,000 of 120,000 of CONVENT, LIP. - - - - - - 280.000 of 200.000 of Oft 17TIL. - - - - - - - 35 Pvroo FOO`7NOTESI 1. Nat Included ,. 30I study n.-b.ro supplied by Red.valop.ent Agency Ooento.n spoclfit glen etternativs dsvolopwant stanartos. 2. Booed on a.lw N condition 1988• 3. Inctud.o 60 8-6 • (60) 625 • 20% - 45,000 GSF. 4. 25DO SF co. mi st •tong Orange contributing to 1n liou parking toed. 5, In it.. psrkl-g road (parking otlo..d off it. by ap.offta pt.n. Coev..rcl.l s 6.25/1000 Office 0 11350 8. Beach Parking toad. 7. Pier Side O.volop.ant - 4/8/80 106,000 N L.vaebt• SIP 698 Parking 1,147 Parking «. 8. Phase 2 O.volopwent - 4/8/86 117.000 GSF CtMs roeat 45,000 G$8.8 160 0e8) 825 0 20% 45,000 GSF 200 D.elting Units 880 Perklrg' • Not.t Represents a concept for dovatop"nt and dove not r.fteot the esalewat total dsystop.•nt for the dlstrlot.. Development Scenario Comparison 1 1 DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES i for private improvements public 1 � x 1 �� ��. IUIp IIIIIIIIIIIIiilll III 1 A IIIIII II�IIIIII IIIIII I jllll l IIII►Illlllll ullf IIIUIIIIII II qIM � x � 1 � ► u���ll 4, Mill I I �tlrrrrnrr n�ntrl. ■YA # 1 City of Huntington Beach i 1 1 - - ' The purpose of this booklet is to resent P P P ' r architectural and siting design guidelines for new ' development and rehabilitation of older structures •��� uM' within the boundaries of the Huntington Beach �� 4 ►Yr+� Downtown Specific Plan and to set forth the standards for future public improvements. AO����!! l�y, The Downtown Design Guidelines are intended to promote high standards in architectural design and ' the construction of aesthetically pleasing buildings which reflect the contemporary Mediterranean design theme of the area. Together, the design guidelines and public improvement standards will give the downtown area a strong, recognizable physical image and identity. ' This booklet is intended to give the designer a clear idea of the architectural elements which must be incorporated into proposed developments. Private I { I developments must also complement the proposed public improvements which are contained in the second section of this booklet. This booklet will serve as a tool for review of mill development proposals within the Specific Plan ' •••••• •••-•••. area. All projects must also conform to the Development Standards contained in the Downtown Specific Plan and applicable sections x of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 1 1 Contents ' INTRODUCTION 1 LANDSCAPING PART ONE—PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS 3. • Design Principals 21 1 ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA • Materials 23First Zone of Exposure 23 • General Design and Siting Guidelines 5 Second Zone of Exposure 26 Building Form and Mass 5 • Lighting 29 The Pedestrian Experience 6 SIGNS 30 ' Views 7 Environment 8 • General Design Guidelines 31 • Building Materials and Color 9 • Standards for Commercial Uses 33 • Roofs 10 • Awning Signs 34 • Windows 11 • Banners 35 • Doorways and Entrances 12 • Canopy Signs 36 • Stairways 13 • Freestanding Signs 37 ' • Balconies 14 • Wall Signs 38 • Arches and Arcades 15 • Window Signs 39 • Plazas 16 1 Fountains 16 PART TWO—PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 41 Paving 16 LIGHTING 43 1 Furniture 16 SIGNAGE AND GATEWAYS 45 Seating Areas 16 MEDIANS 48 • Walls and Fences 18 INTERSECTION ENHANCEMENT 50 ' • Building Details 19 PAVING 53 • Focal Elements 20 STREET FURNITURE 54 Gateways 20 STREET TREES 56 Towers 20 1 Introduction 1 The ocean is our most important asset and the source of the City 's vitality. The Downtown Specific Plan capitalizes upon the ocean and beach-related amenities while recognizing the rich history of the downtown as the early focal point of the IIIIIIII City's civic, recreational , and business activities . The adoption of the Downtown Specific Ills Plan by the City Council in 1983 included III������lllll`��IIII�IIIIII�lllllllllllll a design theme: Contemporary ' Mediterranean architecture, a style Jill( � �i11�I��IIII�������M responsive to the climate and location of the City. The contemporary Mediterranean ' �i1111l111a�-till(IIII III,�,�,,�III����I� style is comprised of many influences--images from the coastal portions of Spain , Italy, Portugal and Greece, mixed with elements of ' contemporary Mexican and Southern Californian architecture . Arches , deeply recessed windows , courtyards , tile roofs , balconies and stucco walls are common features . The climate and ocean proximity dictate orientation to the prevailing breezes , protection from the ` sun and wind and views of the ocean . Light-colored building materials reflect the sunlight and become a background to ' ,I'' ( the brighter accent colors of the building trim and other architectural details . The adopted theme is an expression of the coastal influence on Huntington Beach . The design theme will be carried out not ' only in building design, but through signage , landscape , lighting and streetscape design. 1 2 1 UDC The municipal pier is the focal point of / the design concept set forth in the Downtown Specific Plan . The plan seeks ' to draw pedestrians up Main Street from the pier-head area to the Town Square, a ' retail anchor at the head of Main Street which will include year-round commercial , office and residential uses and a major plaza . The energy and excitement ' generated by activities at the pier-head should be spread throughout the downtown nTa-,w core . Development should be scaled to a O.sw� a pedestrian level with passive activities ' such as strolling and viewing given equal consideration with more vigorous beach activities such as surfing, swimming and bicycling . The overall form and shape of all development in the downtown area should provide view, light and air ' corridors to the ocean wherever possible . Ilk 1111 The pier will continue to serve as the Am main attraction in the downtown area and should become the catalyst for the ' revitalization effort. if�ifia Confi H`yhwtr/ ' I 1 f @'•Q�0 9iac1 rprliatkio' *l�rt�r�,P �. Pltilli .�' �' It 1 `Ail �{II ."'�Jj ,..iR�6 ���i�� ■fit✓:���. ���m��� '� � (/topr -� 'l /�1 �1� f 5��% ®.� w i✓', I �`� ./�. � � ..a•,t 1..� r �''a �'..f�",r,e,Ij ���A -�- r l' ` '✓At llii f % n rr_ r � ,csa ( ((�t'..-i✓�"- i.�f lfda7r'•.'t� %!`. \I\�4 �i .s�..-. .^►— 1 i; ,j, �E3' ��- `"�. i0- 1�d .rr/r/F ?a.a zi Y 411, i 1 General Design and Siting Guidelines 5 BUILDING FORM AND MASS ` ' The relationship of buildings to pedestrian spaces is the key to a lively ano exciting outdoor environment in down- town Huntington Beach . Because the downtown area is to be of a "human scale" , care must be taken to keep the buildings from becoming too massive or imposing. • Tall buildings shall be made less ' imposing by physically stepping A. Step buildings back from the street. them back from the street level. (See Diagram A) ' • Building facades shall be detailed in such a way as to make them appear shorter . This can be done by articulating the separate floor levels with horizontal bands or by increasing the level of detail on the buildings at the street level. • New buildings shall be designed to create pleasing transitions to surrounding development. The bulk of new buildings should relate to the prevailing scale of adjacent ' development. (See Diagram B) ' B. The bulk of new buildings should relate to adjacent buildings as shown in the bottom diagram. The building shown in the top diagram does not relate. 6 I THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE I New aevelopment within the downtown I y should be oriented to pedestrians . The way buildings are sited creates pedestrian spaces . The uses they house I / contribute to a varied and lively streetscape . • Buildings facing pedestrian streets and plazas shall incorporate design features that provide visual interest at the street level. In addition, buildings are required to provide street level uses such as IIJJ shops, restaurants and services I that cater to pedestrians. • Where appropriate in commercial and I mixed-use areas, buildings should A. Create a pedestrian environment with varied provide additional pedestrian and interesting shops and restaurants. activities at levels above or below the street level. (See Diagram A) I • Building setbacks along major pedestrian streets should be varied I to create plaza-like areas which attract pedestrians whenever possible. (See Diagram B) lU I I I I B. Varied building setbacks create plaza-like areas. I ' 7 VIEWS ' Ocean views provide an added attraction . The downtown area offers many spectacular views with the opportunity for additional ' views to be revealed.. • Buildings shall be designed to take adv.anta.ge of ocean views by providing windows , balconies , stairway landings and other design features . ' • New structures shall be designed to respect the views of existing buildings , where possible. View ' corridors should be designed through large developments. • Rooftops shall be designed to be visually attractive when viewed from adjacent buildings . Preserve ocean views. 8 ' ENVIRONMENT ' In site and building design, , environmental factors such as wind, sun , noise, shadow and reflection on buildings L—J L and outdoor spaces must be addressed. ' • Design of buildings and open spaces along the first block inland from Pacific Coast Highway shall take ' —� into account the strong prevailing )i westerly winds . 0 The shadowing effect a new building ' will have upon adjacent development shall be addressed. • The effects of shadows cast by buildings into open areas such as courtyards and plazas shall be ' }� analyzed. Additional sunlight shall be ' brought into large developments through the use of courtyards, atriums and skylights . Orient buildings to provide sunny plaza areas. ' 9 Y 1 Building Materials and Colors 9 PRIMARY MATERIALS Colors can greatly affect the imagery and mood of the downtown area . A harmonious Uniform materials and consistent style color scheme with bright accents will ' shall be evident in all exterior produce a lively atmosphere encouraging elevations . The dominant exterior year-round use . material of a building shall be one of the following: BACKGROUND COLOR Stucco (smooth and textured ) Base walls of buildings and other large Smooth Block expanses shall be light colored . Soft Granite tones ranging from white to very light Marble pastels are required . Neutrals such as off-whites , beige and sand are also Reflective glass is not permitted as a acceptable colors . Light salmon and primary exterior material . other muted colors give a pleasing contemporary appearance . ACCENT MATERIALS ACCENT COLOR Secondary materials shall be used to highlight building features and provide Some building elements shall be brightly visual interest . Secondary materials may colored to contrast with the light include one or more of the following: colored background in order to produce a lively streetscape. Wood Glass Building details such as doors, chimneys , Tile window framing, trim, railings , awnings Brick or light fixtures may be used to carry I Concrete the bright accent color . Care should be Painted Metal taken not to use too many bright colors Wrought Iron or too many different types of details so ' as to avoid an overwhelming or cluttered- looking building. The goal is to achieve a clean, contemporary look . ,o Roofs Appropriate and sim le forms include the ' P shed, gable, and hip roofs which may be I used alone or in combination to achieve the varying roofline characteristic of Mediterranean villages . • Flat roofs shall be avoided. Roof materials most indicative of Shed Gable Mediterranean architecture include clay shingle tile, concrete shingle tile, Mission tile and other tile-like ' designs . Other acceptable roof materials include copper and painted metal . Chimneys , roof flashing, rain gutters, ' downspouts , vents and other roof protrusions should be finished to complement or accent the adjacent ' materials and colors . This can be accomplished by using materials similar Hip Combination to those used on the building or by painting the detail in an accent color . ' Screening of rooftop mechanical equipment shall be incorporated into the building ' design. Mechanical equipment shall not be visible from any angle or any height outside of the building. ' Avoid flat roofs. ' Windows Windows in the Mediterranean style are typically multi-paned. Simple shapes are ' most compatible with the Mediterianean style . Round or odd shaped windows are not appropriate . Variations are best created by using different treatments surrounding the window . Following is a list of ' appropriate treatments: Tile borders ' Colored window framing Shutters Plant-on relief features Iron or wooden grills Dormers Projecting bay windows EEHI Window boxes ' Window pop-outs Simple window shapes are recommended. Other types of windows which let more light in are strongly encouraged. Clerestory windows Skylights ' Greenhouse windows and walls Brightly colored cloth or painted metal ' awnings can enhance the visual appearance of a building. Awnings should be of a solid color and be designed to coordinate with the architectural divisions of the i building rather than being long and continuous . ' Awnings and window boxes add color and variety to the basic rectangular shape. 2 Doorways and Entrances Doors are a major design element in the I —� Mediterranean style . Traditionally they were ornate and highly detailed, adding interest to building elevations . Door I designs and their surrounding treatments I iill can range from the detailed traditional style to a more simplified contemporary I i - version . Appropriate design treatments I' include: Traditional wooden door I � ! Contemporary wood and glass paned door Stucco arch surrounding the door I Brightly colored awning over the door Brightly painted door or framing . ,•,,.. The use of a wall or eave to I emphasize the door Stucco arch blends well with contemporary wood Tile lead-in path to door I and glass door. • Building entries should be protected from the elements and provide a "sense of shelter" by using overhangs and simple recesses . • Building entries should afford a I "sense of entry" for the structure . I � i � I I l O I Q a Protected doorway creates a "sense of entry." 1 Stairways 13 ' Stairways , while functional , often become a major focal point in the design of a building . They can create effects ranging from majestic entryways to understated level changes . As a design element, stairways create visual 1 transitions from one level to another . People are drawn to stairs as a place to - sit and view the surrounding plazas , 1 people and buildings . i I An ornate stairway identifies a major building 1 entrance. ' -,-� 1 1 Tile risers and rails add colorful highlights. 14 Balconies Balconies create outdoor living areas ana 1 serve to break up blank walls on the upper levels of buildings . Balconies ' allow people to take advantage of the ocean breezes , views ana mild climate year-round. A balcony can be aesignea as a seep inset ' on the building form or it can be aesignea as a projection from a builaing. ' Varying wall angles creates unique spaces and interesting building forms . Inset balcony Projecting balcony Decorative iron grills can be used to ' give emphasis to small balconies . In this mild coastal climate it is very ' desirable to use roof tops to provide usable outdoor space in both residential and commercial developments. Awriings, tile and railings can be used for color ' accent . • Balconies in residential projects ' shall be constructed of a solid material up to a height of two feet from the floor of the balcony. ' Above that height open rails or grill work may be used. A rooftop makes an exciting outdoor space. I Arches and Arcades 15 Arches are the most clearly recognizable feature of Mediterranean architecture . They originally developed as a way to ' provide structural support for a doorway . • Care must be taken that arches / ~ appear authentic. The integrity of �I an arch is lost when its mass is not proportional to its size. ' Columns must relate in scale to y 1 that portion of the building which they visually support. - �A When arches are repeated along the length of a building, an arcade is created. Arcades are especially ,p y appropriate in the t commercial and mixed use areas to protect pedestrians from sun and inclement Lf weather . Arcades create cool shaded spaces and pedestrian-scaled walkways . Columns with mass and integrity. They can also create protected areas for temporary outdoor displays and outdoor dining. ' These columns are much too thin. 16 - ' Plazas PLAZAS FURNITURE I Plazas are a vital component of the • Furniture and fixtures used in plazas Downtown area and pedestrian activity is should complement those in the public critical to the success of plazas . A fresh right-of-way. I air environment in which to meet friends , eat lunch , or spend time reading or • Furniture should be selected with watching people will add life and activity maintenance considerations in mind. I to the Downtown , certain woods and metals do not stand up well in the damp, salt-laden air of • A visual feature shall be provided in Huntington Beach 's coastal climate. plazas . This can be a sculpture, a • Tree grates are required in plazas. I fountain or a display pond. Water features provide a strong link to the SEATING AREAS I ocean and are very attractive to pedestrians . • Ample seating shall be provided. Types of seating shall range from single I FOUNTAINS benches to groups of seats or benches. Steps, low walls, and planters can also The use of fountains within the downtown provide seating. area is especially appropriate . Fountains I can become a gathering spot for people and • Both shaded and sunny seating should be offer seating and a cool respite from provided. bustling downtown activities . I • Some seating should be provided that PAVING offers a view of the action and other seating should be located in a quiet • Any decorative paving used in the place. I private plaza areas should complement the paving pattern and color of the pavers used in the public right-of-way. I • Outdoor paved surfaces shall not be waxed or glazed. I OF L ,f7 11n f, iI RZ 19 i °• t /�� � Fy/�F{ � � �' t,9� !_e �lhL�y��r Jay ar ,.r v+.r^.xv y 18 Walls and Fences are an integral ' Walls and fences r part of the architectural form in Mediterranean ' architecture. Walls mark entrances and define the space around buildings , especially those set back from the street . Walls give a sense of privacy ' and separation and screen private developments from pedestrian traffic . They can also be transparent or low, ' allowing the passerby to enjoy the views d without permitting intrusion . Walls may b be constructed of stucco or brick , and highlighted with other materials or I l design features: Decorative inset tiles Wrought iron fence with stucco or ' brick pilasters Bright accent color to highlight pilaster capitals or horizontal I Ornate iron fences do not block views. rails Highly ornate iron entry gates A low planter incorporated into the I base of a wall '' • Walls shall be integrated with the overall building design. I • Where scenic views are available to % ! the community, walls that obstruct views shall not be constructed. I • Solid concrete block walls, grape stake or chain link fencing are not ' permitted. Tile accents a low, stucco wall. Building Details �4 ' Buildin and site details are important 9 P in creating new developments which are of ' high design quality . �w • Building and site details shall be integrated into the overall design ' of the building or development. I , • Elements which can be unsightly, such as utility boxes and air conditioning units, shall be screened from view, yet remain ' accessible for servicing. 4 0 Utility boxes screened from view. • Accessory elements such as ' mailboxes, trash enclosures, and security gates shall be compatible with the architectural style of the Protected mailboxes. ' project. The enclosure stall be made to appear as an integral part of the project by using similar materials and accents which appear ° ' on the building. a • Group mailboxes shall be ' conveniently located and protected from the elements by providing an overhead awning or trellis. Attractively designed trash enclosure. 20 , Focal Elements GATEWAYS Gateways are visual elements which create a sense of entry. Gateways can range in ' 4 n I scale . They may identify an entrance to _ ! the downtown , or , on a smaller scale, they may mark the entrance to a ' ! development or a single building. TOWERS,SPIRES AND DOMES Towers , spires and domes are often viewed from a distance . They become landmarks and serve to provide orientation for people within the downtown area . A clock tower , for example, can be used as a theme for a particular development . An arched gateway attracts pedestrians. ' i I I I 'Z An impressive tower can become a landmark. I I General Landscape Principles 2' ' Emphasis shall be placed on Californian and Mediterranean landscapes and ' gardens . Californian and Mexican native plantings , vines , flowering plants , arbors , trellises and container plantings ' are encouraged . Courtyards , gardens and fountains are all very desirable . Expansive horizontal or vertical surfaces ' comprised of a single material can be segmented or interrupted with vines or foliage . ' Vines can be used to dramatize a r building ' s architecture or soften hard materials . Vines can also be used to ' enhance or screen fences and trash enclosures . / ' The landscaping within courtyards , both public and private , should include a Planters may be incorporated into seating areas. balance of hard and softscape materials , and provide shaded seating areas . ' Boxed and tubbed plants in decorative t� planters of ceramic, terra-cotta, wood, ' or stucco with tile accents can be used to enhance sidewalk shops . ' Large planters may also be incorporated into seating areas . Such planters shall be open to the earth below and be � �-• provided with a permanent irrigation system. �_----- i L' ' Shaded seating areas are desirable in courtyards. 22 ' I Lanoscaping in the setback areas along the inland side of Pacific Coast highway ' should mirror the landscape design of the Bluff Top Park . Appropriate materials shall include Paspolum vaginatum variety I sod with Washingtonia robusta palms. Turf areas shall include mounding . Many sites within the downtown area have ' be.en usea in the past for oil operations or have been subDect to adverse impacts from the oil operations on nearby sites . I Therefore, soil testing for agricultural suitability is required for each site. Any laboratory recommendations which ' / result from such a test must be followed. I Bluff Top Park \1 ' Landscape Materials 23 ' FIRST ZONE OF EXPOSURE All property within the Downtown area ' which is between the high tide line and Walnut Avenue lies within the "first zone of exposure . " Landscape materials in this area are subject to strong prevailing winds and salt laden air . Appropriate landscape materials for the first zone of exposure are: L J F- LATIN NAME COMMON NAME J� ,r TREES Brahea armata Mexican Blue Palm Brahea edulis Guadalupe Palm :: II - ----------- NER , Butia capitata Pindo Palm ' Chamaerops humilis Mediterranean Fan Palm First zone of exposure. Metrosideros New Zealand Christmas ' execelsus Tree Pittosporum Karo (std. ) ' crassifolium Pittosporum tobira Tobira (std. ) ' Washingtonia Mexican Fan Palm robusta SHRUBS Carissa spp. Natal Plum ' Ceanothus spp. Wild Lilac ' Coprosma spp. Mirror Plant 24 ' Dodonea viscosa Hopseed Bush Griselina spp. None ' Juniperus spp. Juniper Leptospermum Australian Tea Tree ' laevigatum � Malaleuca spp. None ' i Metrosideros None ..� villosus ' 1 Myoporum laetum None Pittosporum Karo ' crassifoloum Pittosporum Dwarf Karo ' crassifolium nana Pittosporum tobira Tobira Pittosporum tobira Wheeler 's Dwarf Tobira Wheeleri ' Raphiolepis spp. Indian Hawthorne Rhamnus alaternus Italian Buckthorn ' Rhus integrifolia Lemonade Bush PERENNIALS Euryops pectinatus None ' Felicia amelloides Blue Marguerite Limonium perezii Sea Lavendar ' 1 ' 25 ' GROUNDCOVERS Osteospermum Trailin5 African Daisy fruticosum Arctostaphylos Bearberry uva-ursi Vinca rosea Madagascar Periwinkle ' Arctotheca Cape Weed VINES calendula Muehlenbeckia Wire Vine Baccharis Prostrate Coyote Bush complexa ' pilularis Solandra maxima Cup-of-Gold Vine ' Carissa prostrata Prostrate Natal Plum Tecomaria capensis Cape honeysuckle Carpobrotus edules Sea Fig ' Ceanothus Point Reyes Ceanothus GRASS AND LILY-LIKE PLANTS gloriosus Agave spp. Century Plant ' Ceanothus griseus Carmel Creeper Aloe vera None horizontalis ' Delosperma alba White Trailing Ice Cortaderia Pampas Grass Plant selloana ' Drosanthemum Dracaena spp. None floribundum Rosea Ice Plant Festuca rubra Red Fescue ' Gazania spp. None Pandanus utilis Screw Pine hedera canariensis Algerian Ivy Faspalum spp. None ' Juniperus conferta Shore Juniper Pennisetum Kikuyu Grass Lampranthus Purple Iceplant clandestinum proauctus Phormiur,, tena New Zealand Flax Lantana None Yucca aloifolia Spanish Bayonet ' montevidensis Zoysia japonica Korean Grass 26 , TREES ' Agonis flexuosa Peppermint Tree ' *Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree ' *Callistemon spp. Bottlebrush �} *Calodendrum capense Cape Chestnut ' *Cupaniopsis anacardiodes Carrotwood I� Eriobotrya spp. Loquat '•."S �f Erythrina caffra Coral Tree ' *Eucalyptus spp. Gum Tree Ficus spp. Fig Tree , *Harpephyllum caffrum Kaffir Plum *Hymenosporum flavum Wedding Tree *Magnolia grandiflora Southern ' Magnolia *Melaleuca quinquenervia None ' *Pinus spp. Pine Tree SECOND ZONE OF EXPOSURE *Pittosporum spp. None ' The land located north of Walnut Avenue is within the "second zone of exposure. " *Podocarpus spp. None Wind and salt air again affect the ' vegetation , but not as much as in the *Prunus pissardi Flowering first zone . Appropriate landscape Plum materials include all species listed for ' the first zone as well as the following: *Prunus spp. None 27 1 *Quercus spp. Oak Tree Leucophyllum texanum Texas Ranger ' Raphiolepis None Ligustrum spp. Privets "Magestic Beauty" Nerium oleander None *Tristania conferta Brisbane Box *Indicates street tree PERENNIALS SHRUBS Centranthus ruber Red Valarian Abelia grandiflora Glossy Abelia Baccharis spp. Coyote Bush Coreopsis spp. None Echium fatuosum Pride of Callistemon spp. Bottlebrush Madeira Ceanothus spp. Wild Lilac Pelargonium domesticum Lady ' Washington Cotoneaster spp. None Geranium Choisya ternata Mexican Veronica spp. Speedwell ' Orange VINES Cistus spp. Rock Rose ' Eleagnus spp. None Beaumontia grandiflora Easter Lily Vine Escallonia spp. None Bougainvillea spp. None 1 Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple Ficus pumila Creeping Fig Guave ' Garrya elliptica Tassel Bush Gelsemium sempervirens Carolina Jessamin ' Grevillea spp. None Hibbertia scandens Guinea Gold Hibiscus spp. None Vine ' Lantana spp. None Jasminum spp. None pp. Tea Tree Letos ermum s Lonicera spp. Honeysuckle p 28 I Nacfadyena unguis-cati Cat 's Claw GROUNDCOVERS I Trumpet Vine Arenaria spp. Sandwort I Parthenocissus Boston Ivy Cotoneaster horizontalis None tricuspidata Juniperus horizontalis None I Rhoicissus capensis Evergreen Lantana spp. None Grape Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine Liriope spicata Lily Turf I Lonicera japonica Japanese I GRASS AND LILY-LIKE PLANTS Honeysuckle Agapanthus africanus Lily of the Nile Ophiopogon spp. Mondo Grass Beaucarnea recurvata Elephants Pachysandra terminalis Japanese I p Spurge Foot Cordyline australis Cabbage Tree Phyla nodiflora Lippia Grass I Cynodon spp. Bermuda Grass Thymus spp. Thyme I Festuca elatior Meadow Fescue NOTES: All trees in paved areas shall be provided with Deep Root barriers Hemerocallis spp. Daylily and a 4 ' diameter tree well with I automatic irrigation and metal Liriope spp. Creeping grates. Lily Turf I Soils testing for agricultural Sansevieria spp. Mother-in-laws suitability is required on each Tongue site and the resulting laboratory I recommendations must be followed. Strelitzia reginae Bird of Paradise I Yucca recurvifolia Curve-leaf Yucca I 1 I Lighting 29 ' Lighting within the downtown area will serve to create a festive atmosphere and ' encourage nighttime use of the area by pedestrians . ' • Lighting fixtures shall be !� o attractively designed to complement p� the architecture of the project. ' • Lighting shall improve the visual identification of residences and businesses. ' • Lighting shall be focused to avoid disturbing adjacent residents. • Parking lots shall be adequately lighted for safety and to deter crime. ' Energy efficient nighttime lighting of buildings within the commercial areas is encouraged. Outlining buildings with ' lights creates a festive atmosphere and encourages the use of open spaces and plazas. 30 Signs ' I Signage in downtown Huntington Beach should advertise a place of business or provide directions or information. It should also contribute to the contemporary Mediterranean theme. Design, color , materials and placement are all important in creating signs that are architecturally attractive and integrated into the overall site design . ' The City 's goal is to promote a quality visual environment by allowing only signs which are compatible with their I surroundings and which effectively communicate their message . Due to the unique nature of the downtown ' area there are some special provisions and restrictions with respect to permitted signs. The purpose of this section of the Design Guidelines is to set forth design standards which may be more restrictive than those outlined in the Huntington Beach Sign Code, Article ' 976 . Included in this section is a chart which sets forth the size, number and locational criteria for signage within ' the Downtown Specific Plan area . Unless specifically restricted within this section, all signs are subject to Article ' 976 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 1 General Design Guidelines 3' Good signs communicate their message well , are easilyb seen y people , and relate harmoniously to the building they are placed on or near . The following NOMo&vii7e , guidelines give criteria for creating ` HOME VIDE�OTHEATER well designed signs . ' COLOR - Sign color should be compatible i with building colors . A light background ' matchina the building with dark lettering is best visually. No more than two primary colors should be used on a sign with a third secondary color used for accent or shadow detail . WORDS/SYMBOLS - Fewer words make a more - effective message . Use symbols only if ' they are easily recognizable. Intricate logos, inappropriate for signage. ' SHAPE - Keep the overall shape simple --- - so as not to detract from the message . i PROPORTION - As a general rule , letters should not appear to occupy more than 75% of the sign area . j LETTERING - Avoid hard-to-read and MINOLTA ' overly intricate typefaces . The letter Simple and appropriate logos for signage. style choosen should be appropriate to the business and the building. Souvenir Medium ' Folio Extrabold Franklin Gothic 3A 3Y T E ET H ' Eurostile Bold �Ullvin( 7iIA! Gill Sans Bold Round Bloch Appropriate type for signs. Hard-to-read and ' inappropriate for signs. 32 ' SIZE/LOCATION - Signs should be ' --- consistent with the proportion and scale of building elements within the facade . ' The placement of signs provide visual clues to business location and affects the design integrity of the entire building. ' SUN5HINS'S ' o • Ground level signs should be smaller than those on higher I ••••. • •• .. levels . Pedestrian-oriented signs should be smaller than automobile oriented signs . • Signs should establish rhythm, scale and proportion in facades and arcades . ' These signs block building elements and create a chaotic image. • Sign placement on a facade should complement building elements rather than block them. ILLUMINATION - There are two methods of illuminating signs: internal with the ' light source inside the sign and external with an outside light directed at the sign. ' • Internal illumination is permitted ®�Llttews.® �_G, f?�> on channel letters only. • Signs without channel letters must be illuminated externally. • Signs must be lighted with ' continuous light sources . Following are definitions and examples of I These signs complement the building form creating the different types of allowable signs . a more orderly appearance. Illustrations are provided to stimulate ideas . 1 33 ' STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL USES SIGN S S S USE OF SIGN TYPE MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MAXIMUM NUMBER SIGN AREA HEIGHT OTHER STANDARDS 1. All freestanding signs shall be located in a Business Freestanding One per site 15 sq.ft.or 6 ft. Identification provided the 40 sq.ft.for landscaped planter with no portion of the sign ' P extending beyond the perimeter of the planter. structure on the wooden sand 2. All freestanding signs must be of the site is setback a blasted signs. monument type. minimum of twenty (20) ft. 3. Copy shall be limited to center identification and that the site and/or major-tenant identification. has a minimum 4. Internal Illumination is permitted for channel ' of 100 ft.of letters only. frontage. One per street 1. Signs shall be channel letters for wall signs. Wall or or parking lot 1.0 sq.ft. per 8 ft. 2. Internal illumination is permitted for channel Awning frontage for linear foot of ' each separate building letters only. business. frontage 3. No painted signs permitted. 4. Maximum letter height is 18 inches. ' Under canopy One per business 4 sq.ft. Minimum 1. No internal illumination permitted. or projecting ground learance ft. Window One per business 15%of total 6 ft. 1. Copy shall be limited to business name, window area address, phone number. ' 2. Letters may be vinyl or painted. 1. Sign shall be unilluminated. Tenant Wall One per site 12 sq.ft. 8 ft. 2. Sign shall be located and oriented to the ' Directory pedestrian rather than to the street. 3. All freestanding signs shall be located in a landscaped planter with no portion extending ' beyond the perimeter of the planter. Special Flags Unspecified Unspecified Unspecified Flags, banners,and pennants are permitted ' Banners as temporary signs pursuant to the sign code. Pennants This chart summarizes sign criteria for commercial signs within the downtown area. Signs for residential uses shall follow the Huntington Beach Sign Code. For mixed uses, commercial signs ' shall follow the above chart and signs for the residential uses shall follow the sign code as stated above. 34 Awning Signs Definition: An awning sign is a sign on or attached to a temporary retractable ' shelter that is supported from the exterior wall of a building . These signs are permitted in the downtown area , pursuant to the Sign Standards chart . ` • Sign copy shall be centered on the on awning to achieve symmetry. n � • Message shall be limited to the business name and logo and sized to , be proportional with the awning. 1 An awning sign accents a doorway. 1 Banners 35 Definition: Banners and flags include cloth , plastic , or other materials which have been tested and shown to have long life expectancy and resistance to the ' elements attached to or suspended from any structure , staff , pole, line , framing, or vehicle . These are permitted subject to the discretion of the Design ' Review Board . A flag of the nation or state of California shall be exempt from these regulations . ' Banners and flags will create a festive atmosphere downtown , and promote pedestrian activity in the area . Bright colors are appropriate because they stand out against ' light-colored backgrounds . • Banners must be kept in good ' repair and be replaced when fading or deterioration occurs . • Banners shall not be used for ' advertising. 1 ' Banners add color and festivity to the area. 36 Canopy Signs Definition: A canopy 9 an sign is sign Y 9 attached to the underside of a projecting canopy or protruding over a sidewalk or right-of-way. Canopy signs provide pedestrian scale and can enhance building fronts. Projecting signs are permitted as a special type of canopy sign pursuant to the Sign Standards chart . I s 1 i I I 1 Projecting signs are permitted in the downtown 1 area. i Freestanding Signs 37 1 Definition: A freestanding sign is any ' sign permanently attached to the ground and which does not have a building as its primary structural support. ' The mediterranean theme can be suggested through the use of materials such as stucco and tile. • Pole signs are not permitted in the downtown area. 1 1 � 1 _ ' 1 1 1 ' 1 Tile and stucco accent a freestanding sign. 1 38 Wall Signs Definition : A wall sign is any sign which is attached or erected on the ' exterior wall of a building including the parapet , with the display surface of the sign parallel to the building wall , and which does not project more than eighteen ' • (18 ) inches from the building or project • ; above the height of the wall or parapet. Brightly colored channel letters add to 1 the festive atmosphere and may be illuminated internally. ' Wall murals can brighten and add interest to the downtown area. Wall murals should ' be done to enhance the area rather than 1 for advertising . Wall murals shall be permitted subject to the discretion of • 1Bright channel letters complement a stucco the Design Review Board. surface. . 1 1 Colored the and stucco label an entrance. Window Signs 39 Definition: A window sign is any sign in ' which the name , logo, address, phone number or hours of operation are applied directly to the window of a business or ' placed on a sign hung inside the window. Letters applied to the glass may be vinyl or painted. 51 lyT., CTU, • Interior signs shall be within 360 of the window so as to be readable from the exterior. • Sign area shall be less than 15% of the total window area. • Window signs shall be geared to the pedestrian and be at eye level . • Window signs shall be designed to be pleasing and to aesthetically enhance shopfronts. . R ' Appropriate window signs. � PART TWO � Public Improvements it Lighting 43 ' The existing 6 .6 kv lighting system shall be replaced with a modern and efficient 110 volt system with underground wiring. ' • All lighting fixtures shall be finished in such a manner as to withstand the ' effects of salt-laden air . • The lighting source shall be high pressure sodium vapor or other type ' approved by the City. Three lighting districts have been established within the boundaries of the ' 1 l Downtown Specific Plan . These three areas -� are illustrated on Figure 1 . • Area 1 , which includes all residential areas , shall be illuminated with the standard Southern California Edison ' Company pole fixture. The lighting system shall be owned and maintained by the Southern California Edison Company. (LS1 ) y • Area 2 , Main Street, shall be illuminated with a decorative, J' pedestrian-scaled lighting fixtures . ' The lighting system shall be owned and �. maintained by the City of Huntington ' Beach . (LS2 ) • The theme lighting in Area 2 shall complement the contemporary ' mediterranean design theme. The 1 fixtures shall have multiple luminaries, :\l and have a festive appearance during ' both the day and the night. • Area 3 , which includes all mixed use ' areas, shall be illuminated with a contemporary lighting fixture, 25 to 30 These contemporary fixtures will complement feet in height. The lighting system the Mediterranean theme. shall be owned and maintained by the ' City of Huntington Beach. (LS2) 44 Lighting Plan Area 1 (LS 1 ) Edison Company Fixture 1 Area 2 (LS2) Theme fixture—pedestrian scaled M. Area 3 (LS2) Contemporary fixture 25-30' height dC� I .tt:• B •0 N:ij..... I Ave. orange 47 Olive Ave. M1• 0 Y { O A :i Walnut Ave. ';;; •'''' N IL F to :r:• - Vacitic Coast Highway I I Figure 1 Sin e and Gateways 45 9 a9 Y The type and purpose of signage varies throughout the Downtown area . Signs on private property fall under the authority of Section I - Design Guidelines for Private Improvements . Traffic signage is ' generally regulated by the traffic manual of the State Department of Transportation (Cal-Trans ) . Size, color , and format are ' standardized for warning and regulatory signs . No variation for these signs is permitted although they shall be consolidated wherever possible to minimize clutter . Flexibility can be exercised by the City in the design of entry and guide signs since these are not regulated by Cal-Trans . Entry signs shall be integrated into the ,M design of each gateway announcing arrival to the Downtown area . Guide signs include Qom. ""142 those that announce major attractions such as a conference center , the municipal pier , hotels , or public parking. • The design of entry and guide signs shall be unique to the Downtown area. ' w - The intent of this guideline is to achieve a professionally designed logo which will provide a distinctive name ' and identity for the area, giving it a \ special and recognizable image. ' This secondary gateway gives directions to pedestrians and traffic while having an asthe- tically pleasing appearance. 46 • Entry signs shall be designed in such a ' way as to announce entrance into the Downtown area. • Entry signs shall be designed as an I integral part of the gateway design with landscaping and paving. • Entry signs shall be of sufficient size I to be seen by motorists traveling at average speeds along the street. I • Guide signs located within the Downtown Core shall be of sufficient size to be seen by motorists passing by at average I speeds of 25 miles per hour. • The right-of-way required for the ' construction of both primary and secondary gateways shall be dedicated by the developer . I I I I I I � Gateway Plan 47 Primary ' � * Secondary 48 Medians The location of medians (see Figure 3) has been chosen to better define the core area of the Downtown. Medians within this area shall be designed to contribute to the I unique design theme through the use of paving and plant materials . Although these medians will be treated with a unique design, they should meet the itt Aboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications . • Medians in Pacific Coast Highway shall be coordinated with Cal-Trans. Landscaping shall consist of scattered groupings of palms, low shrubs, and ' ground cover so as not to interfere with views of the ocean. • Decorative paving used in medians shall be identical to that chosen for special intersections and Main Street treatments. ' • Plant materials for medians shall be chosen from the list in Part I according to zone of exposure. M • Median widths may vary from 4 feet to 14 feet based upon the necessity for I left turn pockets and right-of-way requirements. ' v r I 1 Median Plan 4§ mm � H. . � M. �p . orange Ave. \ \ � — . x• & \ ■ : ! § wawa. & + ~ PaCim 2.«Hig-h_, ... _ k :p�pam�. - 77 pmk � Figure ] � 50 Intersection Enhancement Selected intersections within the Downtown ' project area , as shown on Figure 4 , have been identified as "enhanced intersections . " Although the designs of intersection types 1 through 4 may vary ' they should be made similar by the use of common materials . • All such intersections identified ' shall be enhanced through the use of decorative block pavers (see section on paving) and concrete bands . ' INTERSECTION TYPE 1 This should be a showcase intersection, ' setting the tone for active pedestrian use up Main Street and thoughout the downtown . Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway ' • As required by the Downtown Specific ' Plan, full block developments in this location must include a public plaza of ( at least 1,000 spare feet in size at the corner of Main Street and Pacific ' Coast Highway. i INTERSECTION TYPE 2 ' These intersections along Main Street are important components of the ' i pedestrian-scaled link between the development at the pier area and Town Square . Main Street and walnut Street ' Main Street and Orange Street Main Street and Olive Street ' Special paving and concrete bands enhance an intersection. ' 51 0 Design treatment of these three intersections shall be identical . 0 Additional building setbacks shall be required at these intersections to create plaza-like areas where street furniture and other pedestrian amenities may be located. ' 2 0 Buildings at these intersections shall be set back 25 feet from the curb face. (See diagram. ) 0 Setback areas shall include landscaping. Setbacks for Intersection Type 2. INTERSECTION TYPE 3 These important intersections serve as the 251 entries to the Downtown core area . Pacific Coast Highway and Lake Street Pacific Coast Highway and Sixth Street Main Street and Fifth Street 0 Design treatment of these three intersections shall be identical . U_% INTERSECTION TYPE 4 This intersection will require special II design treatment in order to discourage traffic from the downtown core area from entering the adjacent residential neighborhood. II Sixth street and orange Street 0 Design treatment for this intersection may include the use of decorative block Along the Main Street Mall where curbfaces are pavers, concrete bands and traffic irregular, setbacks shall be measured as shown diverting devices placed within the above. street right-of-way. 52 Intersection Enhancement Type 1 - Major intersection r QQ Type 2 - Pedestrian links 0 Type 3 - Downtown entries Type 4 - Traffic diversion ' �j .. r 4` an.. r Figure 4 Paving 53 The texture and color of the ground level ' areas is an essential visual element of the urban streetscape scene . ' • Special paving treatment shall be used along Main Street, in the street intersections shown on Figure 4 and within the street medians shown on ' Figure 3 to unify the Downtown project area. ' • The enhanced paving used in these areas shall be a removable modular type "block paver" . • Block pavers shall be laid in a random color pattern varying from warm earthtone hues to shades of gray. This ' — random color pattern shall be used in all paving applications. This will eliminate the problem of matching II colors should the need for street ������ • I repairs arise in the future. • The paving patterns should be kept ' simple; not complex and confusing. • A concrete band shall be used as a line _ of demarkation between the public ' - - right-of-way and private property. A concrete band can also be used as a transition between block pavers and a7' asphalt within the designated street intersections . (See diagram. ) A concrete band delineates the public right-of- 0 In those areas where decorative block way from the private improvements. pavers are not appropriate, concrete surfaces may be enhanced by aggregate, ' scoring, broom finish or salt finish. • Concrete within the public right-of-way shall not be colored. � 1 54 Street Furniture o Street furnishings can enliven and provide ' 4 variety to outdoor spaces used by the public. Street furnishings serve an aesthetic as well as utilitarian function . proper design and placement of such amenities will reinforce the contemporary Mediterranean design theme and create a lively and festive atmosphere throughout ' the year in the Downtown . • Street furniture includes all items placed within the public right-of-way such as benches , bus shelters , trash receptacles , plant containers , tree grates and guards , bicycle racks , bollards , kiosks and ' fountains . This integrated bench and planter is attractively • The design and selection of street ' furniture shall include considerations decorated with accent tile. for the security, safety, comfort, and convenience of the user , including the handicapped. ' • Wherever possible, street furniture shall consist of specially designed ' units which incorporate several items c— such as benches, planters, newspaper ; A racks and trash receptacles . l � '• street furniture shall be conservative in use of sidewalk space, and maintain a clear width sufficient to accommodate ' pedestrian flows. • All street furniture shall be constructed of long wearing, vandal ' resistant materials, capable of withstanding the coastal climatic conditions . A simple bike rack reduces street clutter. 1 55 ' • The selection, siting and layout of the different elements of street furniture shall insure that each article or structure is designed and situated to be in harmony with both the surrounding furnishings and the area as a whole. All street furniture to be installed by ' private parties as part of a develop- ment shall be subject to approval by the City. o Appropriate materials for street l furniture may include stucco, concrete, painted metal or metalized wrought Tree guards will protect street trees. ' iron . Decorative tiles may be used as an accent. • If concrete is used for benches, the ' surface shall be lightly textured as a deterrent to vandalism. ' o Freestanding trash receptacles shall be bolted into the ground, have a plastic liner and rounded cover . o Large plant containers and planters shall be open to the ground below. A permanent irrigation system shall be ' installed. o Tree grates and tree guards shall be made of iron. o Tree grates shall be expandable, so ' that the inner rings can be broken out as the tree grows. Typical iron tree gates. o Bus shelters shall be kept simple in ' form. No advertisements shall be allowed on the sides or inside the shelter . 56 Street Trees ' • Street' trees shall be planted in ' c accordance with Figure 1. o • Street trees along Main Street shall be planted in the public right-of-way. In ' all other locations street trees shall be planted on private property. • The Washingtonia Robusta (Mexican Fan ' Palm) shall be used as a major theme tree for the downtown core area. d Washingtonia Robusta shall be planted ' in a formal pattern along Sixth Street, sidewalk Orange Street, Lake Street and Pacific width Coast Highway between Sixth Street and i Lake Street. The Washingtonia Robusta ' i planted along Pacific Coast Highway outside of the core area shall be in ' Y informal groupings. i sidewalk private property • Landscaping in the setback areas along width I the inland side of Pacific Coast ' Highway shall mirror the design of the street right-of-way Bluff Top Park . Appropriate materials shall include Paspolum vaginatum variety sod with groupings of Washingtonia Robusta palms. Turf areas shall include mounding. • The Washingtonia Robusta (Mexican Fan i Right Sidewalk Palm) shall be reserved exclusively for g y width Street classification those improvements within the public 100-105' 11' Major —Pacific Coast Highway right-of-way listed above. ' 100' 8' Arterial — Lake,Atlanta,Orange,6th • Street trees shall be planted on 6075' r4'clear Local private property, except along Main ' Street. The sidewalk shall be located adjacent to the curb as shown in the diagram. ' STREET TREE PLAN 57 Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) ' Raphiolepis 'Majestic Beauty' (Indian Hawthorn) G Cupaniopis anacardiodes (carrotwood) Metrosideros excelsa (New Zealand Christmas Tree) ♦� O Trachycarpus fortunei ' S© '':♦m (Windmill Palm) / m a. Pittosporum crassifolium �aa '• (Karo Tree) 0 ;� .''�a �'='•., Chamaerops humilis \� a;••''00 ;�•'•;` (Mediterranean Fan Palm e `:. �♦ 0 ;• ♦, x Brahea armata J � O�,• a 0 O (Mexican Blue Palm) 01. -01 .r 2' O O ' :i : . .N000000000000 0000 ,p000 ': :";`�•r.,,, .� *.... +3*0000000000000 000�K0 ` mot** * * ■I•�� kk� * � * * Xc �` � •• . � �� � 9E ��(c '1` �c • � ' - Figure 5 Acknowledgments 1 1 ADMINISTRATION Charles W.Thompson,City Administrator Douglas La Belle, Deputy Director Redevelopment Mike Adams,Principal Redevelopment Planner 1 Pat Spencer,Special Projects Coordinator DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ' James W.Palin,Director Glen K.Godfrey,Deputy Director of 1 Planning CONTRIBUTING STAFF Florence Webb,Senior Planner Gayle O'Brien,Assistant Planner Pam Posten,Assistant Planner 1 Daryl Smith, Landscape Superintendent Jerry Lockman, Landscape Architect Ann Milkovich,Student Intern 1 GRAPHICS Marc Lemoine SECRETARIAL ' Jan Richards,Administrative Secretary Karen Atwell,Secretary Linda Pitteroff,Secretary 1 1