Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDowntown Parking Master Plan - DTPMP - Public Hearing - Annu STATEMENT OF ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Indicates Portions Of The Meeting Not Included In The Statement Of Action Council Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Monday, September 16, 1996 A videotape recording of this meeting is on file in the City Clerk's Office. Mayor Sullivan called the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 5:00 p.m. in Room B-8. CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL PRESENT: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo ABSENT: None (City Council) Public Hearing -Annual Review And Monitoring Report - Downtown Parking Master Plan -Approved (440.30) The Mayor announced that this was the meeting set for a public hearing to consider the Annual Review and Monitoring Report of the Downtown Parking Master Plan. Applicant: City of Huntington Beach, Community Development Department Request: First annual review and monitoring report of the Downtown Parking Master Plan. The review and report will include: 1. Amount and type of development square footage approved during the annual review period; 2. Total amount of square footage in the Downtown Parking Master Plan; 3. An inventory of existing parking spaces; 4. A parking utilization.study; 5. An assessment'of parking demand compared with parking supply; and 6. A determination that adequate parking remains to serve development allowed under the Parking Master Plan. a Location: Downtown Specific Plan (area generally bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Acacia Avenue, Second Street, and Sixth Street). Coastal Status: This item is located in the Coastal Zone. As part of the annual review and monitoring report, the report shall be forwarded to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission. On File: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, for inspection by the public.. A copy of the staff report is also available at the City Clerk's Office. Environmental Status: Code Amendment No. 92-5 the "Village Concept" amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan was covered under Environmental Impact Report No. 82-2 adopted by City Council Resolution No. 5284 on July 18, 1983. The DTPMP was included as part of the code amendment and is covered by EIR No. 82-1. Community Development Director Fallon and Senior Planner Fauland presented a staff report. Councilwoman Dettloff questioned how the In-Lieu fees are used and Senior Planner Fauland reported that the City is working with the City Treasurer's Office to develop a monitoring and billing process. Mayor Sullivan declared the public hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed. Senior Planner Fauland responded to Councilman Garofalo's questions regarding the status of in-lieu parking fees paid by a business owner who subsequently goes out of business and that business is replaced by a new business. Councilman Garofalo requested that consideration be given to revising parking meter time periods. Community Services Director Hagan reported on the reasons for the establishment of these parking standards including the elimination of persons partying in automobiles. A motion was made by Garofalo, second by Leipzig, to accept as adequate and complete the Annual Review and Monitoring Report of the Downtown Parking Master Plan and forward said plans to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo . NOES: None ABSENT: None Mayor Sullivan adjourned the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at 12:01 a.m.. /s/Connie Brockway City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: /s/ Connie Brockway /s/ Dave Sullivan City Clerk/Clerk Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Orange ) ss: City of Huntington Beach ) I, Connie Brockway, the duly elected City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their adjourned regular meeting held on the 16th day of September, 1996. Witness my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this the 20th day of September, 1996. /s/ Connie Brockway City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California R'B Depu ity Clerk 0- RECEIVED CITY Ct.ERK CITY OF HUNTINGTON HACH,CALIF. SEP 16 1120 AM '96 cr Lo� ram. A Introduction ♦ 1 st Annual Review of the DTPMP ♦ DTPMP became effective on June 1 , 1995 ♦ Review period was conducted from June 1 , 1995 to June 1 , 1996 ♦ DTPMP is centered along the core area of Main St. Introduction - cont. ♦ The DTPMP review and monitoring report will be forwarded to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission for review. ♦ The Planning Commission approved the review and monitoring report at their meeting of August 13 , 1996. Shared Parking Concept ♦ Allows one parking space to serve two or more uses without conflict ♦ Development Thresholds Total - 500,000 sq. ft. Retail - 250,000 sq. ft. Restaurant - 100,000 sq. ft. Office - 100,000 sq. ft. Misc. - 50,000 sq. ft. Shared Parking Concept - cont. ♦ The DTPMP and the land uses within the development threshold of 500,000 sq. ft. shares 1 ,984 parking spaces. Analysis ♦ Review all building activity for the past year ♦ Review all approved projects for the past year ♦ Review the square footage by land uses under each category of the development threshold n � Analysis - cont. ♦ Review requires a series of seven checks as part of the monitoring report Approved Square Footage (# 1 ) ♦ Hula Grill, 221 Main St. ♦ Standard Market, 126 Main St. ♦ Outdoor Dining - 20 sites approved Total sq. ft. = 4,863 � Q Total Square Footage (#2) ♦ 1994 Analysis (approved and anticipated square footage) ♦ 1995 Analysis (occupied square footage only) ♦ Review indicates the total square footage is within the established threshold ��9 Inventory of Existing Parking (#3) ♦ 1 ,984 shared parking spaces ♦ corrections have been made to the inventory table for block by block totals only ♦ 1984 shared parking spaces remain after the corrections were made ♦ Four (4) spaces have been removed for outdoor dining @ 221 Main St. Parking Utilization (#4) ♦ Main Promenade Parking Structure - 815 spaces (4 levels) ♦ Pierside Pavilion Parking Structure - 296 Spaces (2 levels) ♦ On-Street Parking - 492 Spaces Parking Assessment (#5) ♦ Current mix of land uses is provided with adequate parking ♦ Master Plan of land uses will be provided with adequate parking Parking Determination (#6) ♦ Parking is adequate based upon the following: - Minor amount of building activity/approved projects - Minor shift in land uses under the threshold for each category - Adequate parking is provided Coastal Commission Review (#7) ♦ The review and monitoring report will be forwarded to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission for review Conclusion ♦ Continue to monitor the Parking Master Plan ♦ Continue to monitor the mix of land uses ♦ Adequate parking is provided now and in the future Recommendation ♦ Accept as adequate and complete the annual review and monitoring report of the Downtown Parking Master Plan and forward to the California Coastal Commission �d r�- PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF. PUBLIC HEMINO I am a Citizen of the United States and a BEFORE THE CITY resident of the County aforesaid; I am cou CI YOFTHE TY of HUNTINGTON BEACH over the a e of eighteen ears and not a NOTICE IS HEREBY g g years, GIVEN that on Monday, September 16, 1996, at party to or interested in the below 7:00 PM In the City Council entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of ; Chambers,Huntington Main l Street, Huntln�ton Beach, the HUNTiNGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a { tphe City Council will hold a public the on the fol- lowing items: newspaper of general circulation printed I 1. ANNUAL er REVIEW AND P g r p i MONITORING REPORT - � DOWNTOWN PARKING and published in the City of Huntington MASTER PLAN.(DTPMP): Applicarit: City of Hunting- Beach, County of Orange, State of ton Beach,Community De- velopmentCalifornia and that attached Notice is a quest.Fir Department i Re- California, First annual review r and monitoring report of r the Downtown Parking i! ton Beach, California true and complete copy as was printed ; Master Plan. The review 92646, for Inspection by and report will Include: 1) I the public. A copy of the and published in the Huntington Beach I amount and type, of de- I staff report will be available velopment square footage I to Interested parties at the and Fountain Valley issues of said approved during the annual City Clerk's Office after review period;. 2) total September 11,1996. amount of square footage ALL INTERESTED PER- newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: In the Downtown Parking SONS are Invited to attend Master Plan; 3) an Inven- said hearing and express tory of existing parking opinions or submit evi- spaces•4)a parking utiliza- dence for or against-the tion-study 5) an assess application as outlined ment of parking demand I, above. If you challenge the compared wth parking.(' City Council's action In September 5 , 1996 supply;and 6)a determina- 'i court, you may be limited i ' tlOn that adequate parking to raising only those Issues remains to serve de- iou or someone else velopment allowed under raised at the public hearing the Parkingg Master Plan. described In this notice, or Location: Downown Spe• In written correspondence cific Plan (area generally delivered'to the City at, or bounded by Pacific Coast Prior to,the public hearing. Highway, Acacia Avenue, �f there are�any further 1 declare under penalty of perjury, that questions r r Second Street, and Sixth q please call the Street), Pro act Planner; Planning Division at 536- the foregoing is true and correct. Herb Faulang ( 5271 and refer to the NOTICE IS HEREBY , above Item. Direct your ( GIVEN-that Item#1 is cov- written communications to I ered by Environmental Im- the City Clerk. . pact Report No.82-2. Connie Brockway, Executed on September 5 6 NOTICE IS .HEREBY City Clerk,City of Hurt. GIVEN that Item # 1 Is lo- tington Beach, 2000 99 at Costa Mesa, California. cared In the Coastal Zone. Main Huntington BeachFlCal• vi part of.the annual re- view and monitoring report,�, Ifornle, 92648, (714) the report shall be for. 1 536.3227 warded to the Executive Db i' Published Huntington rector of the California' gton Coastal Commission. ) Beach-Fountain Valley In. ON FILE:: A copy of"the�I ie�psndent September. 5, Pro es City Glows 0�ce,II 2000 Maln Street, Huntln +L 091-252 9-I -J Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. County of Orange ) am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below _ !NOTICE IS HEREBY , entitled matter. i am a principal clerk of PUBLIC NOTICE GIVEN that Item#1 Is•cov- NOTICE OF I eyed by Environmental Im- the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a PUBLIC HEARING PNOTI ortNo.8HE NOTICE IS HEREBY.. newspaper of general THE CITY GIVEN that Item # 1 Is lo- general circulation, printed COUNCIL OF THE cated in the Coastal Zone. and published in the City of Huntington CITY OF As part of the annual re- HUNTINGTON BEACH view and monitoring report, NOTICE IS HEREBY the report shall be for- Beach, County of Orange, State of GIVEN that on Monday, warded to the Executive DI- September 16, 1996, at rector of the California California, and that attached Notice is a 7:00 PM in the City Council Coastal Commission. true and complete copy as was printed Chambers,Huntington Main ro FILE: q copy of the Street, Huntington Beach, j proposed request Is on file the City Council will hold a n the City Clerk's Office, j public hearing on the fol- 2000 Main Street, Huntin - an published in the Huntington Beach PCaliforniaowing Items: ton Beach, Callforn and Fountain Valle Issues of said A Co 1. ANNUAL REVIEW AND 9zsa8, for Inspectlon by y MONITORING REPORT - the public. py of the DOWNTOWN PARKING staff report will be available newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: MASTER PLAN (DTPMP): to Interested parties at the Applicant: City of Hunting- , City Clerk's Office after ton Beach,Community De. September 11,1996. velopment Department Re- ALL INTERESTED PER- quest: First,annual review SONS are Invited to attend and monitoring report of said hearing and express the Downtown Parking opinions or submit evl- Master Plan. The review dence for or against the September 5, 1996 and report will include: 1) application as outlined 1 amount and type of do- above.If you challenge the In September 12, 1996 velopment square footage court, you may be(limited p ' approved during the annual � review period; 2) total to raising only those Issues , amount of square footage you or someone else- in the Downtown Parking raised at the public hearing Master.Plan; 3) an Inven- described in this notice,or declare, under penalty of perjury, that tory of existing parking 'I in written correspondence spaces;4)a parking utiliza- r1 delivered to the City at, or the foregoing is true and correct. tion study; 5) an assess- Prior to,the public hearing. � If -there are any further ; ment of parking demand questions please call the `compared with parking Planning Division at 5the supply and 6)a determina- Plan and refer to the tion that adequate parking ! above and Direct your remains to serve de- Executed on September 12 199 6 velopment allowed under written communications.to 'the'Parking Master Plan. the City Clerk. at Costa Mesa, California. Location: Downtown Spe- ' , Connie Brockway, ciflc Plan (area generally .f City Clerk, City of Hun- bounded by Pacific Coast I•tington Beach, 2000 Highway, Acacia Avenue, ; Main Street,2nd Floor, Second Street, and Sixth Huntington Beach,Cal- Hterre�eg,Pro ect Planner;,`! Ifomla, 92648, (714) • - I 536-5227 l Published Huntington Beach-Fountain Valley In- . dependent September 5,',' 12,1996. 092-308.' Signature s Council/Agency Meeting Held: 6 41 (� �h�� a2 G V he Deferred/Continued to: 0,Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied City Clerk's Seature Council Meeting Date: September 16, 1996 Department ID Number: CD 96-45 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ..y ,194 SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Adminis a o / PTOWN PREPARED BY: MELANIE S. FALLON, Community Development DirectoSUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORT - DOW PARKING MASTER PLAN Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: On June 1, 1995, the revisions and " update to the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) commonly referred to as the "Village Concept" became effective. As part of the revisions, a shared parking concept was prepared for the core area of Main St. (see Attachment No. 1). The shared parking concept is referred to as the Downtown Parking Master Plan (DTPMP). The DTPMP includes provisions that require the plan be reviewed on an annual basis and a monitoring report be sent to the Planning Commission, City Council and the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission The review and monitoring report contained herein is the first annual report on the DTPMP. The review was conducted from June 1, 1995 to June 1, 1996. The Planning Commission reviewed and accepted as adequate and complete the annual review and monitoring report of the Downtown Parking Master Plan at their meeting of August 13, 1996. Funding Source: There is no funding required by the recommended action. Recommended Action: Motion to: "Accept as adequate and complete the annual review and monitoring report of the Downtown Parking Master Plan and forward to the Executive Director of the California, Coastal Commission". v CD9645.DOC 08/29/96 2:03 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 16, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-45 Alternative Action(s): The City Council may continue the DTPMP annual review and monitoring report for additional information. Analysis: PROJECT PROPOSAL: As noted, this is the first annual review and monitoring report of the DTPMP. The DTPMP is based on a shared parking concept. Shared parking in effect allows one (1) parking space to serve two (2) or more individual land uses without conflict. Shared parking relies on the variations in the peak parking demand for different uses. In other words, parking demands will fluctuate in relationship to the mix of uses by hour, day of week and season. The proper mix will create an interrelationship among different uses and activities which result in a reduction of the demand for parking. In the approval of the DTPMP, the California Coastal Commission imposed measures to ensure that adequate parking be provided for the proposed development threshold in the plan. The DTPMP has a maximum development threshold for uses to ensure the proper mix of uses and the proper function of the shared parking concept. The maximum development threshold is 500,000 sq. ft. with a commercial/retail threshold of 250,00 sq. ft., an office threshold of 100,000 sq. ft., a restaurant threshold of 100,000 sq. ft. and a miscellaneous threshold of 50,000 sq. ft. The 500,000 sq. ft. of development activity in the DTPMP shares 1,984 parking spaces (see Attachment Nos. 2 & 3). The purpose of the annual review and monitoring report is to monitor the building activity and land uses within the DTPMP. The DTPMP monitoring report requires a series of seven (7) checks. These checks are as follows: 1) amount and type of development square footage approved during the annual review period; 2) total amount of square footage in the Downtown Parking Master Plan area; 3) an inventory of existing parking spaces; 4) a parking utilization study; 5) an assessment of parking demand compared with parking supply; 6) a determination of whether adequate parking remains to serve development allowed up to the total development cap; and 7) the annual review and monitoring report shall be submitted to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission for review. A brief status report on each of the aforementioned checks is provided below. CD96-45.DOC -2- 08/29/96 2:03 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 16, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-45 Approved Square Footage During the review period from June 1, 1995 to June 1' 1996, the city approved two projects which affected the overall square footage in the DTPMP. In addition, the city approved a number of restaurant uses for additional outdoor dining area. A brief outline of the approved uses follows: HULA GRILL - 221 MAIN ST. #F The DTPMP includes a mix of uses and building square footage for the building at 221 Main St. In establishing the Hula Grill, the applicant converted a portion of an existing 3,400 sq. ft. office suite into the approved restaurant use. The remaining area of the suite remains designated as office. The intensification of square footage from office use to restaurant use generates the need for additional parking. The approval of a 1,120 sq. ft. second floor restaurant use with 396 sq. ft. of balcony seating required the applicant to pay for 10 in-lieu fee parking spaces (10 spaces @ $1,000 per space = $10,000). The approved project required a minor shift in restaurant and office square footage in each land use category within the overall development threshold. The approved restaurant use recently opened for business. STANDARD MARKET - 126 MAIN ST. The DTPMP identified an 8, 875 sq. ft. building with 5,875 sq. ft. of commercial/retail and 3,000 sq. ft. of restaurant for the building at 126 Main St. The applicant requested a mix of 4,890 sq. ft. of commercial/retail and 4,584 sq. ft. of restaurant uses. The change in square footage per use requires the applicant to pay for six (6) in-lieu fee parking spaces (6 spaces @ $12,000 per space = $72,000). Please note, the City Council's final approval of the project will necessitate modifications to the building. The modifications will likely effect the overall square footage and mix of uses. To date, revised plans have not been submitted for review. Minor modifications to the development threshold may be required. OUTDOOR DINING During the review period the city approved approximately 20 restaurant uses for outdoor dining. All 20 sites complied with code and maintain a total area of outdoor dining that does not require any additional parking. The total area of outdoor dining for the 20 approved sites is 4,683 sq. ft. (see Attachment No. 4). The DTSP allows outdoor dining and does not require additional parking if the outdoor area complies with the stipulated area parameters. Since all sites comply with code, no additional parking is required and is noted only for informational purposes. CD96-45.DOC -3- 08/29/96 2:03 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 16, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-45 Total Square Footage As noted, the DTPMP has an overall development threshold of 500,000 sq. ft. Within the overall threshold are thresholds of 100,000 sq. ft. for restaurant uses, 250,000 sq. ft. for commercial/retail uses, 100,000 sq. ft. for office uses, and 50,000 sq. ft. for miscellaneous uses. These threshold were established to ensure that the shared parking concept would function properly based upon the proper mix of uses. The DTPMP uses square footage and land use information gathered from 1994 (see Attachment No. 5). The review process has allowed staff to re-analyze the activity in the downtown since the original numbers were established. The development activity and change of uses in the downtown are within the established thresholds (see Attachment No. 6). The following is a comparison chart: . . 1994.,Land:;Use Analysis (DTPMP) '''' ::1995 Land:Use An (REVIEW.);: Occu ied and`Antici ated:' (Occupied Restaurant 101,302 sq. ft 78,900 sq. ft. Retail 209,925 sq. ft. 122,400 sq. ft. Office 107,174 sq. ft. 97,200 sq. ft. Miscellaneous 40,575 sq. ft. 52,400 sq. ft. .: TOTALS 458,976 SO. FT. 350 900 SQ. FT The 1994 land use figures used in the DTPMP included occupancy levels of existing buildings as well as future structures (i.e., Main Pier Phase II, Third Block West) and their associated square footage. The 1995 review figures are only the occupied square footage of the existing buildings. The review indicates that the activity level is within the 1994 land use figures used in the DTPMP. One important factor in this review is the ability to shift square footage between land use categories. This allows the city to work within the overall development threshold of 500,000 sq. ft. Caution is necessary however, when shifting square footage between land use categories. The city needs to be aware that the balance that has been established by the thresholds for each land use category is very important to the ability of the shared parking concept to work and function properly. Continued monitoring of the land uses and development activity is key to the success of the DTPMP. Inventory of Existing Parking As noted earlier, an inventory total of 1,984 parking spaces are shared in the DTPMP. This is indicated in the Downtown On-Site Parking Summary table (see Attachment No. 7). A number of incorrect totals for each block were noted and found in the original table. The incorrect information resulted in parking spaces credited for the wrong block. As part of the CD96-45.DOC -4- 08/29/96 2:03 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 16, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-45 review process, corrections have been made to the inventory table. However, the total number of parking spaces (1,984) remains the same (see Attachment No. 8). Also, two of the outdoor dining uses (221 Main St. Suites A & B) were approved to remove four (4) on-street parking spaces. The approval to remove the four (4) spaces was conditioned upon participation in the in-lieu parking fee program. The applicant has paid his in-lieu parking fees (4 spaces @ $12,000 per space = $48,000) and just recently completed the removal of the four on-street parking spaces. Because the spaces have just been recently removed, they will be analyzed in next years review and monitoring report. Parking Utilization As part of the review process, the city continues to monitor the utilization of parking in the downtown. One of the main aspects of the monitoring program is the city's ability to monitor the city's parking structure. The 815 space Main Promenade Parking structure is monitored by the Community Services Department. The city charges for parking in the Main Promenade Parking structure from 10:00 AM to 2:00 AM. Validations are available to all businesses, as well as monthly and yearly parking passes. The current validation to paid parking ratio is four to one. This is the ratio that the city was trying to attain by the implementation of the most recent parking fee structure. Generally, the current turnover ratio in the parking structure is an hour and twenty minutes. Daily occupancy averages less than 20 percent before noon, 40 percent between noon and 4:00 PM, 60 percent between 4:00 PM and 10:00 PM, and less than 20 percent after 10-00 PM. The parking structure averages a 40-60 percent utilization over a one year period (see Attachment No. 9). As can be expected the summer months generate the highest occupancy percentage (60%) with the off season or winter months the lowest (40%). Also noted, Friday and Saturday evening between 8:00 PM and 12:00 midnight are the highest average occupancy (75%-80%) for the parking structure. During the summer months and on selected holiday weekends (Memorial Day, July 4th, Pierfest, Labor Day) the parking structure has been full for brief periods of time. Staff also conducted spot field surveys of the 296 space parking structure under Pierside Pavilion. The spot surveys found that the second level of the parking structure is extremely underutilized. Staff noted 0-10 parked cars on the second level with an overall utilization of the 296 space parking structure at approximately 25-40 percent. Improved use of the second level is being pursued by staff and the management company of Pierside Pavilion. Staff also reviewed the on-street parking spaces. The 492 on-street parking spaces are highly utilized and have a greater turn over ratio because the majority are metered to allow 15-20 minute intervals . The review found them to be used first, before the parking structure, and fully (100%) utilized. As noted, the City Council revised parking fees to put an emphasis on convenience rather than cost to park in the downtown area. These new fees have been successful in encouraging beachgoers to park in recreational zones and CD96-45.DOC -5- 08/29/96 2:03 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 16, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-45 residents to park in residential zones, thus freeing up the business zone for patrons of the downtown businesses. Business zone meters are divided into two types; short (20 minutes) and long term (2 hours). The short term meters are primarily in front of coffee shops and bakeries doing early morning business and requiring more frequent turnover than two hours. Parking Assessment A parking supply and demand analysis was conducted to assess whether adequate parking is provided (see Attachment No. 10). The analysis was conducted based upon the 1984 existing parking spaces and the most recent mix of uses in the downtown. The analysis indicates that adequate parking is supplied for the current demand based upon the current mix of uses and the total amount of square footage allocated under the development threshold. The review also requires the city to determine if the parking supply will accommodate the Master Plan of land uses for the Downtown. The analysis indicates the overall Master Plan of land uses contained in the development thresholds will provide adequate parking (see Attachment No 11). This determination is based upon the demand generated by the mix of land use within the Master Plan. Parking Determination Based upon the annual review and monitoring report, staff has determined that adequate parking is currently provided in the DTPMP. This finding is based upon the minimal building activity, the minor shifts in square footage, and the demonstration that the existing parking spaces continue to accommodate the current mix of uses and activity in the downtown. Continued monitoring of the DTPMP and the careful allocation of the square footage for each land use category will ensure continued success for the DTPMP. Coastal Commission Review The DTPMP annual review and monitoring report shall be forwarded to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission. The report will be forwarded after the report is reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. Environmental Status: Code Amendment No. 92-5 the "Village Concept" amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan was covered under Environmental Impact Report No. 82-2 adopted by City Council Resolution No. 5284 on July 18, 1983. The DTPMP was included as part of the code amendment and is covered by EIR No. 82-2. CD96-45.DOC -6- 08/29/96 2:03 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 16, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-45 Attachment(s): NumberCity Clerk's Page 1. Area Map - Downtown Parking Master Plan 2. Downtown Parking Master Plan (DTSP - Section 4.2.14) 3. Supplemental Information (DTPMP approved July 7, 1993) 4. Downtown Establishments with Outdoor Dining 5. DTPMP - Land Use Master Plan (July 1993) 6. DTPMP - Current Inventory of Land Uses (October 1995) 7. DTPMP - Downtown On-Site Parking Summary (July 1993) 8. DTPMP - Master Plan of Parking (July 1993) 9. Main Promenade Parking Structure Statistics (July 1995-June 1996) 10. DTPMP - Current Parking Supply and Demand (October 1995) 11. DTPMP - Master Planned Parking Supply and Demand (Oct. 1995) 12. Planning Commission Staff Report (8/13/96 w/o Attachments) MTU:MSF:HZ:hf CD96-45.DOC -7- 08/29/96 2:03 PM � ATTACHMENT 1 lI LEGEND PARKING MASTER PLAN AREA 1 A. Main Pier Two B. Pierside Pavilion/Pier Colony C. Second Block Rehab. D. H.B. Promenade E. Third Block West ,♦ ��9 F. Post Office Block �y AR EA 2 �F♦ G. Town Square s� H. Forth Block East ti ♦s ��F� I. Art Center Block 401 s L ORANGE — — — AVE. Fl OLIVE I AVE. I Z >` cn — Z Z _-- co cli ----- WALNUT AVE. — — — ----------------- J L _PAJF1(;S0,UT WY — — (PMASTFN.COR)_� ATTACHMENT 2 4.2.14 The Downtown Parking Master Plan The Downtown Parking Master Plan is based on a shared parking concept. Shared. parking.;� effect allows one (1) parking space to serve two (2) or more individual land uses without conflict. Shared parking relies on the variations in the peak parking demand for different uses. In other words, parking demands will fluctuate in relationship to the mix of uses by hour, day of week and season. The proper mix will create an interrelationship among different uses and activities which results in a reduction of the demand for parking. The Downtown core area is centered along the Main Street commercial corridor. This commercial corridor divides into two (2) distinct areas, north and south of Orange. The area which encompasses the Downtown Parking Master Plan is as identified on the area map (Figure 4.1). Area 1 - The area south of Orange Avenue along Main Street provides the greatest amount of public parking opportunities both off-street and on-street. Area 1 will have the greatest number of visitor serving and seasonal commercial uses including year round entertainment. This area will also have the greatest concentration of expanded commercial, restaurant and office uses, and therefore, the majority of the public parking spaces should be provided in this area. Area 2 - The area north of Orange Avenue along Main Street provides limited amounts of public parking opportunities. This area is still part of the Downtown core. However, the commercial uses in Area 2 will cater more to the year round residents, therefore, additional on-street short term parking should be provided. This area will be a mixed use area with a significant amount of residential uses. The amount of commercial and office parking has been reduced. City owned and controlled public parking in the Downtown Parking Master Plan (DPMP) area shall be consistent with the City's certified land use plan. The DPMP is structured to protect beach user parking by providing adequate public parking within the Downtown area. The DPMP encourages the use of the City owned and controlled parking sites within the DPMP area. To encourage the use of the City owned public parking facilities, parking controls such as time limits, and parking rates may be adjusted to maintain the desired use of these spaces by patrons and employees of the downtown area. A validation program for the City owned public parking structure has been established as an incentive for the use of the structure by the patrons and employees of the downtown area. Any changes to the program shall be submitted to the Executive Director to determine if an amendment to the Specific Plan is necessary. The Downtown Parking Master Plan anticipates a total development scenario of approximately 450,000 to 500,000 square feet of commercial activity. The Master Plan has development thresholds of 100,000 square feet for restaurant, 250,000 square feet for retail, 100,000 square feet for office and 50,000 square feet for miscellaneous development. Area 1 will contain approximately 350,000 to 400,000 square feet with the remaining 50,000 to 100,000 square feet of activity occurring in Area 2. It shall be the responsibility of the Community Development Department to monitor the development square footage per use and parking spaces within the Downtown Parking Master Plan area. An annual review and monitoring report of the Downtown Parking Master Plan shall be prepared by the Department and presented for review by the Planning Commission. G:DWNtWNSP 12 Downtown Specific Plan Revvc_d 6/1/95 The Downtown Parking Master Plan annual review and monitoring report shall include, , at a minimum: 1) amount and type of development square footage approved during the annual review period; 2) total amount of square footage in the Downtown Parking Master Plan area; 3) an inventory of existing parking spaces; 4) a parking utilization study; 5) an assessment of parking demand compared with parking supply; 6) a determination of whether adequate parking remains to serve development allowed up to the total development cap. The Downtown Parking Master Plan annual review and monitoring report shall be submitted to the Executive Director of the Coastal Commission for review. If the Downtown Parking Master Plan annual review and monitoring report indicates that the parking supply is inadequate to serve the approved level of development or if the development square footage exceeds the amount described above (up to 500,000 square feet total) all development within the Downtown Parking Master Plan area shall provide parking consistent with Off-Street Parking and Loading Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, unless and until new parking to meet the identified demand is approved and constructed. Changes between one or more of the individual use categories may be allowed as long as the total square footage does not exceed 500,000 square feet and there are corresponding changes in the other use categories to assure adequate parking remains. The existing base square footage shall be as described in the document approved by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission on July 7, 1993 titled Downtown Huntington Beach Parking Master Plan. The location and type of parking resources available in the Downtown area recognizes that two different and distinct implementation approaches are necessary for each of the areas. The adjusted parking requirement was calculated for both Area 1 and Area 2 (Figure 4.2). Existing building square footage and uses are parked within the public parking supply within the Downtown Parking Master Plan. In the event a property owner demolishes his/her existing building, and rebuilds a new building of equal square footage and use, no additional parking shall be required. Any code required parking spaces provided on- site shall be credited for any expansion of square footage or intensification of use. All required parking shall be calculated based on the reduced requirements of the Downtown Parking Master Plan. Area 1 - In Area 1 the restaurant and retail parking requirement was reduced by thirty- three percent and twenty-five percent respectively. The office requirement by seventy- five percent. In addition, the theater parking requirement was reduced from the existing code requirement of one (1) parking space for every third seat to one (1) parking space for every fifth seat. This reduction is based on surveys conducted by the • theater industry. These reductions recognize the time differential and captive market concepts. Expanding commercial activity in this area remains the focus of the Downtown Master Plan, however, no additional parking for new or expanded commercial, restaurant and office uses should be required. The majority of public parking opportunities currently exist in this area and the current parking supply exceeds the parking demand. This parking supply will continue to be adequate provided the total square footage of uses do not exceed the Master Plan projections. The city shall retain the option to purchase property for a public parking facility. G:DWNTWNSP 13 Downtown Specific Plan. Revised 6/1/95 ' Downtown Parking Master Plan Codified Parking Requirements New Parking Standard (Reduction Factor) Land Use H.B. Code Area 1 South Area 2 North (Percentage Reduced) (Percentage Reduced) Retail 1:200 1:250 1:400 (25 %) (50 %) Restaurant 1:100 1:150 1:100 (33 %) (0 %) Office 1:250 1:13000 1:500 (75 %) (50 %) Note: At any time it deems necessary, the Planning Commission may require additional on-site parking to meet the parking demands generated by a use or development. Figure 4.2 Z . 3 Area 2 - In Area 2 the retail and office requirement was reduced by fifty percent: This recognizes that the retail activity will be primarily convenience commercial catering to local residents on short term shopping trips. The office parking requirement reduction is based on the minimal number of office opportunities and the on-site parking. Restaurant uses were not given a reduction factor. Numerous conflicts are created between restaurant and residential uses, therefore, restaurants should be required to provide one hundred percent of their parking requirement on-site. The existing Downtown public parking facilities are not conveniently located for use in this area, thus, a combination of expanded on-street and on-site parking may be necessary for new or expanded commercial uses. However, providing the commercial activity remains primarily service related commercial, the existing supply of on-street and on- site.parking should be sufficient for anticipated uses. All future development projects must be carefully reviewed for parking concerns. The mix of commercial and residential activities can justify a parking reduction and additional parking may not be necessary if development does not exceed the Master Plan projections. The city shall retain the option to purchase property for a public parking facility. The Planning Commission or City Council may impose one (1), all, or a combination of the following requirements to ensure that adequate parking is provided for each development: 1. Require on-site parking for all projects one-half(1/2) block or greater in size. 2. Require that any parking in-lieu fees be full cost recovery based on the parking requirement for specific uses. However, allow that these fees be paid over an amortization period, with appropriate security provided by the applicant to guarantee payment.. 3. Require valet parking once the maximum build out of restaurant activity has been obtained. 4. Commercial projects greater than 10,000 square feet in size shall be required to submit a parking management plan consistent with the Downtown Parking Master Plan. 5. Require valet and/or remote parking for special events and activities. 6. Require the applicant to provide additional on-site and/or off-site parking for any development. 7. Develop parking options which may generate additional parking for any development. 4.2.15 Landscaping. In addition to City standard landscape plans and specifications, the following shall apply: (a) All setback areas fronting on or visible from an adjacent public street, and all recreation, leisure and open space areas shall be landscaped and permanently maintained in an attractive manner and shall be consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines. (b) Permanent automatic electric irrigation facilities shall be provided in all landscaped areas. G:DWNfWNSP 14 Downtown Specific Plan '� Revised 6/1/95 ATTACHMENT 3 1 � Downtown Huntington Beach PARKING MASTE R PLA N Planning Commission Approved July 7 , 1993 3 . � DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN Table of Contents Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 History. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ThePlan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ParkingSupply. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Parking Utilization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Parking Demand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Attachments : 1 . Existing and Proposed Land Use Analysis 2 . Parking Structure Utilization Survey 3 . Downtown On-Street Parking Survey 4 . Downtown Parking Analysis DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN INTRODUCTION Historically, in the City of Huntington Beach, parking has been the number one issue of concern when considering any proposed change. That concern has transformed into the driving consideration for approving or denying development projects in the Downtown area . The provision of adequate parking is vital to the successful operation of any commercial area . Residents, business owners, visitors, developers and planners each have different definitions of the word adequate when it pertains to parking . Parking strategies for the Downtown Huntington Beach area are complicated further by the proximity of the beach and the different types of parking needs for the various beach uses . Over the years, Huntington Beach has had a number of parking strategies prepared. These studies have identified various procedures to satisfy the parking needs of different types of users . Over time, it has been necessary to modify the recommendations to accommodate the ever changing desires of the City' s redevelopment efforts . Despite these changes the basic principals still hold true. Parking spaces for Downtown shoppers should be provided in convienent locations within or immediately adjacent to the Downtown area, and should be in both on-street and off-street locations (including parking lots and structures) . Presently, public parking opportunities exist in the Downtown area. A public parking structure has been constructed and on-site subterranean parking facilities have been provided in private development projects . This, coupled with a restriping of the public streets to accommodate diagonal parking, has provided the downtown area with a current surplus of parking spaces . The purpose of this study is to assure that an adequate supply of parking is planned to accommodate the remainder of Downtown development and rehabilitation. Parking Master Plan -1- (1915D) 3e03 0 � a 0-FM ���D;(�J ,0�o� q,o❑fat g- nnmo fP�1I O 0 n o� � IT-W44 04 fl ICI .... :-/NMI '� ,o, l , loT ............ a ...r r.i�l.ia.• tea'__.::-. Ul 0 r-� Jnf' HISTORY In 1985, the City (in conjunction with the firm of Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc. ) prepared a Parking Facilities Plan. The general concept for the plan was based on Downtown Huntington Beach becoming a major activity center in the region, providing a variety of shopping, dining and recreational opportunities to visitors, as well as, year round residents . The plan called for four (4) parking structures of 300 spaces each in remote corners of the Downtown. This scheme along with on-street and off-street parking was intended to accommodate approximately 500, 000 square feet of retail/restaurant/office activity including three (3) hotels . The parking demand projections for this plan were based on the assumption that parking facilities are more efficiently utilized when a group of different land uses share a parking facility. Therefore, a reduction factor of 20% of the City' s parking code requirement was recommended. This was justified by .the mix of uses in the core area. However, due to the high cost of land assembly and construction cost associated with four (4) separate structures, this plan was not pursued. In 1986 a new Downtown Master Plan was prepared by 3D International and adopted by the City. This plan identified two (2) parking structures of 600 spaces each in the Downtown core area . One (1) in the second block and one (1) in the third block both within one-half (1/2) block of Main Street . These structures along with subterranean parking under both the Main-Pier Phase I and Main-Pier Phase II projects and expanded parking facilities along the ocean side of Pacific Coast Highway would be able to accommodate over 1, 000, 000 square feet of Downtown commercial activity. This plan was partially implemented with the construction of two (2) levels of parking (296 spaces) below the Main-Pier Phase I project (Pierside Pavilion) and with the construction of the first public parking structure in the second block of Main Street (815 spaces) . However, in an effort to pursue additional redevelopment projects and attempt to make each project more cost effective, the additional parking structure in the third block and the subterranean parking in the Main-Pier Phase II project were eliminated. The result of these actions and the desire to reduce land use intensities created the need to prepare the Downtown Village Concept and a new Downtown Parking Master Plan. Parking Master Plan -3- (1915D) LEGEND PARKING MASTER PLAN AREA 1 A. Main Pier Two B. Pierside Pavilion/Pier Colony C. Second Block Rehab, D. H.B. Promenade E. Third Block West F. Post Office Block AREA 2 / G. Town Square ` �F♦ H. Forth Block East I. Art Center Block Lp IN �- ORANGE -- — —AVE. oy <`'. i sl i Cn F OLIVE N AVE. N �: ... <E. 0 o `~" Q Z z _ — — — WALNUT AVE. Cn 10 I THE PLAN The new Downtown Parking Master Plan is based on a shared parking concept . Shared parking in effect allows one (1) parking space to serve two (2) or more individual land uses without conflict. Shared parking relies on the variations in the peak parking demand for different uses . In other words parking demands will fluctuate in relationship to the mix of uses by hour, day of week and season. The proper mix will create an interrelationship among different uses and activities which result in a reduction of the demand for parking. Therefore, an overall reduction to the City' s required parking should be permitted. The effectiveness of a shared parking plan is dependent upon the control of many variables . Of prime concern is the location and availability of parking facilities . The location of parking in relation to Downtown commercial areas is constrained by the availability of land, its high cost (either in dollars or in lost opportunities) and the distance which people are willing to walk ' from centralized lots or structures to reach their destination. Studies have shown that in order to receive optimum utilization by shoppers, a parking facility should be within 300 to 500 feet of the commercial use which it serves . For workers, or other people who are parking for the whole day, the distance can be as great as 1, 500 feet. These constraints must be considered when evaluating possible locations for parking facilities . The Downtown core area is centered along the Main Street commercial corridor. The Downtown Master Plan encourages a concentration of commercial activity along Main Street and, thus producing the greatest parking demand. Parking Master Plan -5- (1915D 5 6o? DOWNTOWN LAND USE MASTER PLAN Block Restaurant Retail Office Miscellaneous AREA 1 (square feet) (square feeO (square feet) (square feet) A 22,798 30,953 40,299 B 31,773 27,834 16,000 30,000 C 29,785 37,365 22,175 (1,750 D 5,000 24,073 3,000 seat theatre) E ------- 19,000 8,000 F 4,000 24,200 13,000 Sub Total 93,356 162,425 102,474 AREA 2 G ------- 25,000 4,700 10,575 H ------- 20,000 ------- (Art Ctr) I 7,946 111 2,500 ------- Sub total 7,946 47,500 4,700 Total 101,302 209,925 IF 107,174 Master Plan 100,000 226,666 100,000 :1 50,000 Parking Master Plan -6- (1915D) Vies In order to properly analyze the distinctively different parking needs, this commercial corridor divides into two (2) distinct areas north and south of Orange Avenue. Area 1 - The area south of Orange Avenue along Main Street provides the greatest amount of public parking opportunities both off-street and on-street. Area 1 will have the greatest number of visitor serving and seasonal commercial uses including year round entertainment . This area- will also have the greatest concentration of expanded commercial, restaurant and office uses, and therefore, the majority of the public parking spaces should be provided in this area . Area 2 - The area north of Orange Avenue along Main Street provides limited amounts of public parking opportunities . This area is still part of the Downtown core. However, the commercial uses in Area 2 will cater more to the year round residents, therefore, additional on-street short term parking (20 minute) should be provided. This area will be a mixed use area with a significant amount of residential uses, therefore, the need for commercial and restaurant parking has been reduced. Another variable in providing an adequate supply of parking concerns the mix of anticipated activities and uses in the Downtown area . The success of this parking plan depends on controlling the types and amounts of retail, restaurant and office uses in the Downtown. The Downtown Master Plan anticipates a total development scenario of approximately 450, 000 to 500, 000 square feet of commercial activity. The final variable requires the implementation of regulations to the parking resources through parking rates, time limits and other methods which should be adjusted periodically to maintain the optimum use of all parking facilities . Parking Master Plan -7- (1915D) as • LEGEND A. Main Pier Two B. Pierside Pavilion/Pier Colony C. Second Block Rehab. D. H.B. Promenade E. Third Block West F. Post Office Block G. Town Square y H. Forth Block East I. Art Center Block sr I G , ORANGE AVE. II ` OLIVE _ E._ N \ l I zl N L0 �G' co N ----- ---- "- '--- WALNUT — 7E.— - ------------ il g I PACIFIC COAST HwY. -- - - - - -. - - - -- - - - - - - - -= - - - - - - - I I I I I I — — — Downtown Metered Parking 3. to Pnrkinci Mnstar Pie-in PARKDIMPCDR PARKING SUPPLY The first step in the preparation of the Downtown Parking Master Plan is to know the amount of public parking facilities currently available. An inventory of the existing Downtown on-street parking spaces was prepared by the City' s Traffic Engineering staff and a verification study was conducted by Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates (Attachment No . 3) . This study surveyed each block in the Downtown area and determined the on-street parking potential . The survey indicates approximately 778 total on street parking spaces are available in the Downtown area. The study reveals that nearly forty percent of these parking spaces are unmetered and the majority of them are only charging $.25 per hour. Although the survey identified 778 total parking spaces only half of those spaces are suitable for the commercial demands of the Downtown area . The remaining spaces are either in residential areas or are too great a distance from the commercial uses . DOWNTOWN ON STREET PARKING SUMMARY BLOCK Metered Free Total AREA 1 Third Street 21 27 48 Main Street 82 82 Fifth Street 116 116 Walnut Avenue 14 7 21 Olive Avenue 11 15 26 Orange Avenue 16 16 Sub Totals 244 65 309 AREA 2 Metered Free Total Main Street 39 9 48 Pecan Avenue 17 17 Frankfort Avenue 10 10 Acacia Avenue 18 18 Sufi Totals 39 54 93 Totals 283 119 402 Parking Master Plan -9- (1915D) � • LEGEND A. Main Pier Two B. Pierside Pavilion/Pier Colony C. Second Block Rehab. D. H.B. Promenade E. Third Block West F Post Office Block G. Town Square H. Forth Block East fey I• Art Center Block k` \ �f. �; l` N. ORANGE AVE. ♦ P l'LC\ OLIVE AVE. n WALNUT AVE. -- --- ---------------- .:............ PACIFIC COAST HWY. - - - - - I I - - - - - -.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I Off Street Parking Lots Parking Master Plan _ _ (OFFSTPICCOR) In addition to the 402 on street public parking spaces, the Downtown area has 1, 111 existing parking spaces in structured facilities, 309. spaces in existing surface lots with an additional 164 plus spaces planned. On-site parking has always been a major component of large development projects . The combined studies indicate that the total parking supply available at maximum build out will be approximately 1, 984 spaces . There are 1, 714 parking spaces in Area 1 and 270 spaces in Area 2 . These spaces are a combination of on-street public, on-site public and on-site private spaces . Continued monitoring of the Downtown areas parking supply will be a necessary task as the uses change over time. Downtown On-Site Parking Summary Block REA 1 EXISTING PROPOSED FINAL A 56 75 75 B 296 --- 296 C 6 --- 6 D 815 --- 815 E 132 --- 0 F 25 --- 25 Subtotal 1,330 75 1,217 Bloc RA EA 2 EXISTING PROPOSED FINAL G 17 --- 17 H 61 89 150 1 10 --- 10 Subtotal 88 89 177 Total 1,418 164 1,394 Total 1,582 Ultimate Total 1,394 On-Street 402 TOTAL DOWNTOWN PARKING - 1,984 ULTIMATE DOWNTOWN PARKING -L796 Parking Master Plan -11- (1915D) PARKING STRUCTURE UTILIZATION STUDY TIME 2-19-93 2-20-93 5-29-93 5-30-93 5-31-93 OF DAY No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % 10:00 am 36 4.4 43 5.3 150 18.4 131 16.1 114 14.0 12:00 pm 58 7.1 52 6.4 3:00 pm 84 10.3 165 20.2 418 51.3 413 50.7 428 52.5 6:00 pm 138 16.9 232 28.5 8:00 pm 425 52.1 370 45.4 278 34.1 12:00 am 367 45.0 272 33.4 70 8.6 Note: Total Public Parking Spaces 815 Source: Greer and Co. City of Huntingtin Beach Department of Community Services Parking Master Plan -12- (1915D)�' '� PARKING UTILIZATION In order to better determine the true effectiveness of a shared parking approach for Huntington Beach, Greer and Company prepared a Downtown Parking Analysis (see Attachment No . 4) . This study reviewed the inventory of existing public and private parking spaces and then surveyed the utilization of these spaces . The study also reviewed the existing and proposed land uses and the current and future parking demand. The study indicated that the on-street metered parking spaces are used nearly 100% of the time during peak business hours, while the subterranean parking facilities within the Main Pier I project are used less than 25% of the time. The study also showed strong activity in the use of the parking lots in the third block on Main Street (50%) , while the public parking structure usage for the same time period was only 20-30% of capacity. The study then concluded that the area had a great surplus of parking opportunities . During the time of this study the Downtown area was approximately 10% vacant . However, due to the time of year when the study was conducted,, additional information was necessary. Therefore, the Downtown Parking Analysis survey information has been augmented with operational statistics of the Downtown Parking Structure for selective peak periods . The additional survey data was collected over Memorial Day weekend (May 29 - 31, 1993) . During this weekend, the City experienced good weather conditions, thereby increasing the parking demand. The survey revealed that on this busy weekend with numerous new businesses open, there were still nearly half of the spaces in the Parking structure available for use at the peak demand times . Parking Master Plan -13- (1915D)� LEGEND PARKING MASTER PLAN AREA 1 A. Main Pier Two B. Pierside Pavilion/Pier Colony C. Second Block Rehab. D. H.B. Promenade E. Third Block West F. Post Office Block AREA 2 �F♦ G. Town Square H. Forth Block East♦ sr�, I. Art Center Block I �F� r �- ORANGE -- — —AVE. I s I r� F OLIVE o AVE. `E. > ; WALNUT AVE. I L I _PASS I.QQ CQAU HW.... _ .j PARKING DEMAND The final analysis compares the intended mix of uses and the number of parking opportunities . The shared parking concept relies on three (3) assumptions which will result from the proper blend of uses and activities . 1. The first assumption recognizes that various uses have different peak parking demands . For example retail and restaurant uses have a peak parking period different from offices . In Huntington Beach many of the restaurant uses also have different peak times . Some restaurants cater to a morning and lunch customers while others are primarily open for dinner. Time differentials can also refer to seasonal activity which demands different attention. Huntington Beach has always experienced a greater demand of its parking resources in the summer months . 2 . The second assumption is based on the idea that people who work and live in an area also shop in that same area. This captive market of office workers and residents are likely to be many of the restaurant and retail customers . This is particularly true for the Downtown area, due to its rather isolated location from other commercial centers . 3 . The third assumption derives from observation that in an active commercial center patrons generally shop at numerous locations on a single auto trip. In order to realize this concept a variety of activities must be offered in the commercial center. The plan does not address residential parking in the shared parking concept . All required residential parking shall be provided on-site for each project . Parking Master Plan -15- (1915D) DOWNTOWN VACANCY RATES (February 1993) BLOCK SQUARE FOOTAGE Q VACANT A 50, 500 21. 19 (10, 700 sf) B 75, 607 11. 08 (8, 375 sf) C 90, 925 0 D 32, 073 0 E 25, 163 26 . 62 (8, 538 sf) F 27, 825 0 G 29 , 700 11 . 11 (3 ,300 sf) H 32, 250 24 . 81 (8, 000 sf) I 21, 021 0 Total 385 , 064 10 . 11 (38, 913 sf) Source: City of Huntington Beach Departments of Community Development and Economic Development Parking Master Plan -15- (1915D)Solis As stated before, maximum buildout for the Downtown area will be between 450, 000 - 500, 000 square feet of commercial activities . Area one will contain approximately 350, 000 to 400, 000 square feet with the remaining 50, 000 to 100, 000 square feet of activity occurring in Area 2 . The traditional code required parking for this intensity and mix of commercial activities would indicate a need for approximately 2,700 parking spaces in Area 1. This would require 1, 000 additional parking spaces over the current and anticipated supply. Although this is a 40% reduction, the mix of activities is ideal for the shared parking approach. A comparable reduction of 33% is also identified for Area 2 (code required parking is approximately 300 spaces with a supply of approximately 200 spaces) . Therefore, the Downtown Parking Master Plan proposes an overall reduction of the code required number of parking spaces based on these assumptions along with a proposed maximum buildout of commercial activities . Parking Master Plan -17- (1915D ' • DOWNTOWN PARKING REQUIREMENTS Block Code Required Parking with (Reduction Factor) Restraurant Retail Office Misc. Total Adjusted Area 1 (25%) (25%) (gp%) (*) Total A 230 (58) 155 (39) 160 (128) 545 (225) 320 B 320 (80) 140 (35) 64 (51) 583 (233) 1107 (399) 708 C 300 (75) 185 (46) 88 (70) 573 (191) 382 D 50 (13) 120 (30) 12 (11) 182 (54) 128 E - 95 (24) 32 (26) 127 (50) 77 F 40 (10) 120 (30) 52 (42) 212 (82) 130 Sub Total 940 (236) 815 (204) 480 (328) 583 (233) 2746(1001) 1745 Area 2 (0%) (50%) (50%) Total G - 125 (63) 19 (10) 144 (73) 71 H - 100 (50) 100 (50) 50 1 80 (0) 13 (7) 93 ( 7) 86 Sub Total 80 (0) 238 (120) 19 (10) 337 (130) 207 Total 1020 (236) 1053 (324) 427 (338) 583 (233) 3033(1131) 1902 (*) Reduction: 1 space for every 5 seats Parking Master Plan -18- (1915D RECOMMENDATIONS ,In order to determine the appropriate amount of parking which should be available, an adjusted parking demand was calculated using the previously stated assumption. This adjusted parking requirement was calculated for both Area 1 and Area 2 . The location and type of parking resources available in the Downtown area recognizes that two different and distinct implementation approaches are necessary for , each of the areas . Area 1 - In Area 1 the restaurant and retail parking requirement was reduced by twenty-five percent and the office requirement by eighty percent . In addition the theatre parking requirement was reduced from the existing code requirement of one parking space for every third seat to one parking space for every fifth seat. This reduction is based on surveys conducted by the theatre industry. These reductions recognize the time differential and captive market concepts . Expanding commercial activity in this area remains the focus of the Downtown Master Plan, however, no additional parking for new or expanded commercial, restaurant and office uses should be required. The majority of public parking opportunities currently exist in this area and the current parking supply exceeds the parking demand. This parking supply will continue to be adequate provided the total square footage of uses do not exceed the Master Plan projections . As a means of assuring an adequate future supply of public parking spaces, a site should be identified and preserved for a potential parking structure. This area should be within the .Main Pier II project area. Parking Master Plan -19- (1915DJS 7 Area 2 - In Area 2 the retail and office requirement was reduced by .fifty percent . This recognizes that the retail activity will be primarily convenience ` commercial catering to local residents on short term shopping trips . The office parking requirement reduction is based on the minimal number of office opportunities and the apparent demand that any new office uses will need to provide on-site parking. Restaurant uses were not given a reduction factor. Numerous conflicts are created between restaurant and residential uses, therefore, restaurants should be required to provide one hundred percent of their parking requirement on-site. The existing Downtown public parking facilities are not conveniently located for use in this area, thus, a combination of expanded on-street and on-site parking may be necessary for new or expanded commercial uses . However, providing the commercial activity .remains primarily service related commercial, the existing supply of on-street and on-site parking should be sufficient for anticipated uses . All future development projects must be carefully reviewed for parking concerns . The mix of commercial and residential activities can justify a parking reduction and additional parking may not be necessary. To further assure parking availability all parking spaces should be limited term (20 minutes maximum) . Also a site should be identified and preserved for a potential surface parking area . This location should be near the intersection of 6th and Lake Streets . Parking Master Plan -20- (1915D •�� ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS In order to assure the most efficient and effective use of the City' s parking facilities, the following recommendations should be implemented: City Initiated: Immediate Implementation: 1 . Increase the parking meter fee from $.25 per hour to $1. 00 per hour for all downtown meters with a two (2) hour maximum stay. 2 . Maximize the amount of on-street parking spaces to diagonal and reduce the number of parallel spaces . 3 . Prior to the Downtown Parking Master Plan becoming operational, the Redevelopment Agency/City must identify and acquire two (2) sites, one (1) in Area 1 and one (1) in Area 2 for . future parking opportunities . 4 . Designate two (2) additional parking facility locations : a . Include an option for an additional parking structure in the Main-Pier Phase II project area, Block 104 . b. Include a surface parking facility at the north end, between Sixth Street and Pecan Avenue, adjacent to Lake Street. 5 . Eliminate all free public parking locations in the downtown. 6 . Improve the signage for parking facilities . Short Term (within 1 year) : 1. Require residential parking passes for the non-commercial districts in the downtown area. 2 . Require the mandatory purchase of annual parking passes for all employees at the time of business license renewal . 3 . Require designated employee parking areas in the remote portions of all parking facilities . 4 . Conduct annual parking analysis to forecast when actual number of spaces available requires new parking resources . 5 . Investigate use of shared beach parking to accommodate after 6 : 00 p.m. peak hour uses, e.g. restaurant, theaters, and/or employee. Parking Master Plan -21- (1915 '�� Based on Entitlements : .1. Require on-site parking for all projects one-half (1/2) block or greater in size. 2 . Require that any parking in-lieu fees be full cost recovery based on the parking requirement for specific uses . However, allow that these fees be paid over an amortization period. 3 . Require valet parking once the maximum buildout of restaurant activity has been obtained. 4 . Commercial projects greater than 10, 000 square feet in size shall be required to submit, a parking management plan consistent with the Downtown Parking Master Plan. 5 . Require valet and/or remote parking .for special events and activities . Parking Master Plan -22- (1915 •�� CONCLUSION The provision of adequate parking is vital to the successful operation of any commercial area . Therefore, many controls will be necessary and rates adjusted to maintain an adequate supply of conveniently located public parking. The required parking by City codes does not take into consideration the public use patterns of the Downtown area. Establishing the overall parking demand for the Downtown simply by adding the peak parking requirements for individual land uses produces an estimate that is unrealistically high. The true parking demand needs to be determined for mixed use project . The mixed use project identified for Downtown Huntington Beach in the Master Plan can -be accomplished with limited additional public parking facilities and proper land use and operational controls . ATTACHMENTS 1 . Existing and Proposed Land Use Analysis 2 . Parking Structure Utilization Survey 3 . Downtown On-Street Parking Survey 4 . Downtown Parking Analysis j Parking Master Plan -23- (191515 EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE ANALYSIS Prepared by the Department of Community Development a MAY 1993 ATTACHMENT N0.3206 LEGEND A. Main Pier Two B. Pierside Pavillion/Pier Colony C. Second Block Rehab. D. H.B. Promenade =C. E. Third Block West F. Post Office Block ` G. Town Square H. North Main Street Block I. Art Center Block f 'o I t S� .o s, °o G s Orange Ave. t in V) E F I t in Ulive Ave. C D Walnut Ave. i A B c , e N Pac)fic Coast Highway f -- .t n,-rnr_WNAF-NT NOSZI Block A Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 101 Main Retail 2,500 0 Abdelmuti Project 13,953 2,798 30,299 75 Residential 03 du) 109 Main Retail 2,500 0 111 Main Retail 2,500 0 113 Main Retail 2,500 0 115 Main Retail 2,500 0 Office 2,500 406 PCH Restaurant 2,200 0 410 PCH Retail 4,000 10 (A-1) 117 Main Restaurant 2,500 0 Coultrup Project 12,000 20,000 10,000 N/A Office 2,500 119 Main Retail 2,500 0 (Block 104) 121 Main Retail 2,500 0 123 Main Retail 1,500 2 416 PCH Retail 3,000 12 Residential (4 du) 122 5th Auto Sales 12,000 12 (A-2) 151 Sth Theatre 5,500 50 Coultrup Project n/a n/a n/a Residential(80 du) 501 Walnut Office 1,500 0 (Block 105) 505 Walnut Residential 1,200 0 (1 du) 504 PCH Retail 1,250 0 508 PCH Restaurant 1,250 8 > Residential 2 0 du) 520 PCH Retail 1,500 16 (A-3) Residential • 0 du) M 127 Main Retail 3,500 6 Lane/Terry(A-4) 5,000 n/a ,e:.. 513 Walnut Retail 2,500 0 Worthy Project (A-5) Bed Breakfast(12 du) 12 Residential _ 0 2 du) �) 519 Walnut Retail 800 0 128 6th Residential (1du) TOTAL: 30,9531 22,7981 40,2991 1 87 Block B Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 112 Main Retail 2,500 Pierside Pavilion 14,459 23,773 16,000 Theatre(1750 seats) 296 114 Main Retail 2,500 Residential (4 du) 306 PCH Nita Club 5,500 25 302 PCH Auto Repair 8,250 115 3rd Auto Repair 4,500 12 301 Walnut Office 2,400 311 Walnut Office 2,000 317 Walnut Retail 1,000 (13-1) Residential 0 du) 102 PCH 85 Pier Colony Residential(130 du) 112 3rd 24 118 3rd Res.(2 du) 120 3rd Res.0 du) • 122 3rd Res.(4 du) 124 3rd Res.0 du) 217 Walnut Res.0 du) 215 Walnut Ras.0 du) 213 Walnut Res.11 du) 127 2nd Res.0 du) 126 Main Retail/Res.(6 5,875 Standard Market (B- 5,875 3,000 du) 3) 116 Main Retail 2,500 2,500 118 Main Retail 2,500 2,500 120 Main Retail 2,875 2,500 122 Main Retail 1,250 2,500 124 Main Retail 2,125 2,500 TOTAL: 27,834 31,773 16,000 296 T rti nz z z 0 Block C Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 201 Main Restaurant 2,125 4,500 5,000 203 Main Retail 2,875 205 Main Retail 1,650 1,650 207 Main Retail 4,900 4,900 209 Main Restaurant 2,000 2,000 211 Main Retail 2,625 2,625 675 213 Main Retail 540 540 213 1/2 Main Restaurant 585 585 Patio 1.000 215 Main Restaurant 1,750 1,750 1,800 Res.16 du) Patio 750 217 Main MTG Room 1,000 1.000 Patio 1,500 221 Main Retail 2,500 6 4,250 9,100 4,200 223 Main Retail 1,750 Residential(4 du) 411 Olive Retail 2,000 6 4,400 2,400 412 Walnut Restaurant 1,800 3,600 Office 1,800 202 5th Res.(6 du) 1,600 Police 1,600 206 5th Res.(1 du) 208 5th Restaurant 4,000 2 1,000 3,000 Res.(2 du) Patio 500 214 5 th Auto Repair 5,000 5,000 3,000 218 5th Office 1,000 2 2,500 2,500 220 5th Office 1,000 2 2,500 2,500 222 5th Retail/Res. 3,500 4 3,500 3,500 �..) (2 du) TOTAL; 37,3651 29,7851 22,1751 1,600 r. r- ..y1 e •�V ,prG V AA 1w Block D Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 202 Main Retail 5875 Main Promenade 24,073 5.000 3,000 815 1750 208 Main Office 5,500 210 Main Retail 2,750 212 Mein Retail/Res. 2,750 (6 du) 214 Main Retail/Res. 2,750 (6 du) 218 Main Retail 5,875 220 Main Retail 1,250 10 222 Main Office 1,500 224 Main Retail 2,938 226 Main Retail 2,938 228 Main Retail/Res. 2,938 6 (6 du) 209 3RD n/a 40 211 3RD Res.(6 du) 218 3RD We 30 221 3RD Res.(1 du) 223 3RD Res.(2 du) 225 3RD We 24 321 Walnut Office r___;O001 TOTAL: 24,073 5,000 31000 815 r' .t A Block E Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 303 Main Retail 500 12 Third Block West 19.000 8,000 Residential(68 du) 134(comm) 305 Mein Retail/Res. 1,750 4 (8 du) 307 Main Retail/Res. 1,750 4 (8 du) 309 Main Retail 2,938 8 311 Main Retail 1,600 20 325 Main n/a 40 302 5TH Retail 5,500 20 Office 5,500 310 5TH Retail/Res. 2,125 (2 du) 314 5TH Office 3,500 328 5TH Res.(1 du) 320 5TH n/a 25 TOTAL1- 19,0001 0 8,000 134 r 2 Or— Block F Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 316 Olive Post Office 3,575 5,000 Post Office 3575 316 Main (F-1) 318 Main Retail 1,250 6 6,000 4,000 81000 320 Main Retaif 1,250 6 322 Main Office 1,000 6 324 Main Office 1,000 2 326 Main Office 2,250 6 328 Main Retail 4,250 (F-2) 303 3rd Auto Repair 8,250 (F-3) 13,200 315 3rd Office 2,500 24 2,500 305 Orange Office 2,500 6 2,500 TOTAL: 24,200 4,000 13,000 ;r. 7 :y s. �y J Block G Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 420 5th Retail 2,500 Town Square 10,000 Residential(89 du) 15(comm.) 416 Orange Res.(1 du) 408 5th Res. 11 du) 410 5th Res.(1 du) 412 5th Office 1,000 416 5th Res.(1 du) (G-1) 401 Main Retail 7,700 7,700 405 Main Retail n/a 17 4,000 411 Main Retail 3,300 3,300 417 Main Office 2,500 2,500 419 Main Office 2,200 2,200 TOTAL. 25,0001 4,700 15 y ti Y -y J Block H Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL, RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 410 Main Retail 6,900 24 Fourth Block East 20,000 Residential(100 du) 150 424 Main Retail 8,500 428 Main Retail 5,500 438 Main Retail 2,550 440 Main Retail 2,500 504 Main Retail(4 du) 6,300 401 Lake Res.0 du) 405 Lake Res.(1 du) 407 Lake Res.0 du) 409 Lake Res.0 du) 421 Lake Res.(3 du) 427 Lake Res.0 du) 431 Lake Res.(4 du) 435 Lake Res.(4 du) 437 Lake Res.0 du) 443 Lake Res.0 du) 505 Lake Res.0 du) 201 Pecan Res.0 du) 205 Pecan Res.0 du) 209 Pecan Res.0 du) TOTAL: 20,000 150 r r Block I Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 520 Main Restaurant 5.280 5,280 522 Main Restaurant 2,666 2,666 526 Main Retail/Res. 2,500 2,500 (3 du) 538 Main Office 10,575 10 Art Center 10,575 10 TOTAL: 2,500 7,946 10,575 10 I L ATTACHMENT 4 Downtown Establishments with Outdoor Dining NAME ADDRESS SQUARE FEET 1. Bagelmania 101 Main St. #113 306 2. BJ's Chicago Pizza 200 Main St. #101 272 3. Ocean Pacific Market 200 Main St. #103 Pending approval 4. Sunset Grill and Cafe 200 Main St. #105 118 5. Baskin & Robbins 201 Main St. Unit B 76 6. Midnight Expresso 201 Main St. Unit D 40 7. China Wok 209 Main St. 140 8. Holly's Yogurt 211 Main St. 182 9. Rock - N- Java 211 Main St. Unit B 586 10. Sugar Shack 213 Main St. 182 11. Longboard 217 Main St. 399 12. Riitmo Tratu 221 Main St. Unit B 503 13. Pacific Coast Cafe 221 Main St. Unit C 400 14. Starbucks 221 Main St. Unit A 205 15. Jan's Health Food 300 PCH, #104 230 16. Aimee's Bakery 300 PCH 400 17. Burger King 101 Main St. #410 196 a 18. Supreme Donuts 602 PCH 80 19. Java Jungle 602 PCH, Unit B Pending approval 21. Las Golindrinas 501 Main St. Unit C Pending approval 22. Cornerstone 510 Main St. 240 23. Pete's Mexican Food 213 Fifth St. 128 (g:Wdowntown\outdoor) Total Outdoor Dining Area: 4,683 sq. ft. 44 . l ATTACHMEN T 5 1 DOWNTOWN LAND USE MASTER PLAN lock Restaurant Retail Office Miscellaneous AREA 1 (square feet) (square feet) (square feet) (,square feet) A 22,798 30,953 40,299 B 31,773 27,834 16,000 30,000 C 29,785 37,365 22,175 (1,750 D 5,000 24,073 3,000 seat theatre) E ------- 19,000 8,000 F 4,000 f 24,200 13,000 Sub Total I 93,356 162,425 I 102,474 AREA 2 G ------- 25,000 I 4,700 10,575 H ------- 20,000 ------- (Art Ctr) I 7,946 I� 2.500 ------- i I Sub total 7,946 47,500 4,700 Total IF 101,302 F 209,925 107,174 Master Plan F100,000 220,000 100,000 50,000 f Parking Master Plan -6- (1915D) ATTACHMENT 6 x. CURRENT INVENTORY OF LAND USES BLOCK RESTAURANT RETAIL OFFICE MISC. VACANT A 6,700 s.f. 27,600 s.f. 23,400 s.f. - 13,900 s.f. B 24,800 s.f. 23,200 s.f. 13,600 s.f. 30,000 s.f. 12,400 s.f. 1,750 seat C 27,900 s.f. 15,000 s.f. 11,000 s.f. 2,400 s.f. 4,200 s.f. D 11 ,300 s.f. 13,800 s.f. 7,000 s.f. - - E - - 8,800 s.f. - 2,400 s.f. F 1,200 s.f. 7,200 s.f. 18,400 s.f. - 1,000 s.f. SUB TOTAL 71,900 s.f. 86,800 s.f. 82,200 s.f. 32,400 s.f. 33,900 s.f. G - 14,500 s.f. 9,200 s.f. - 3,000 s.f. H - 15,400 s.f. 5,800 s.f. 10,000 s.f. - 7,000 s.f, 5,700 s.f. - 10,000 s.f. - SUB • TOTAL 7,000 s.f. 35,600 s.f. 15,000 s.f. 20,000 s.f. 3,000 s.f. TOTAL 78,900 s.f. 122,400 s.f. 97,200 s.f. 52,400 s.f. 36,900 s.f. 350,900 s.f. Oct., 1995 \ 169 �� ATTACHMENT 7 A In addition to the 402 on street public parking spaces, the Downtown area has 1, 111 existing parking spaces in structured facilities, 309 spaces in existing surface lots with an additional 164 plus spaces planned. On-site parking has always been a major component of large development projects . The combined studies indicate that the total parking supply available at maximum build out will be approximately 1, 984 spaces . There are 1, 714 parking spaces in Area 1 and 270 spaces in Area 2 . These spaces are a combination of on-street public, on-site public and on-site private spaces . Continued monitoring of the Downtown areas parking supply will be a necessary task as the uses change over time. Downtown On-Site Parking Summary �1s�k AREA i E ISTIIVG PROPOSED FINAL A 56 75 75 B 296 --- 296 C 6 --- 6 D 815 --- 815 E 132 --- 0 F 25 -- 25 Subtotal 1,330 75 1,217 Ic AREA 2 EXISTING20POSED FINAL G 17 --- 17 H 61 89 150 1 10 -- 10 Subtotal 88 89 177 Total 1,418 164 1,394 Total 1,582 Ultimate Total 1,394 On-Street 402 TOTAL DOWNTOWN PARKING -L2 4 ULTIMATE DOWNTOWN PARKING - 1.796 Parking Master Plan -11- (1915Dr7 I ATTACHMENT 8 L r MASTER PLAN OF PARKING, JULY 1993 BLOCK ON-STREET OFF-STREET TOTAL A 78 64 142 B 34 296 330 C 59 6 65 D 51 815 866 E 63 134 197 F 55 0 55 SUB TOTAL 340 t 1 ,315 1,655 G 56 17 73 H 74 150 224 1 22 10 32 SUB TOTAL 152 177 229 TOTAL 1 492 1 ,492 1,984 175 � . ' ATTACHMENT 9 COMMUNITY SERVICES HUNTINGTON BEACH Departmental Memorandum TO: Herb Fauland FROM: Steve Benson DATE: July 7, 1996 = RE: DOWNTOWN PARKING STATISTICS JUL 091996 MAIN PROMENADE. Parking Statistics - Month Year Paid Total Autos Revenue July 95 20,522 83,422 $ 54,736 August 95 17,669 78,092 $ 46,279 September 95 12,431 62,262 $ 33,983 October 95 8,388 54,516 $ 23,652 November 95 7,806 52,292 $ 22,610 December 95 6,453 51,001 $ 18,358 January 96 7,397 53,678 $ 18,870 February 96 6,166 52,402 $ 18,991 March 96 9,313 63,687 $ 27,934 *April 96 21,421 59,553 $ 62,782 May 96 18,719 58,827 $ 55,736 June 96 22,805 65,568 $ 68,538 TOTAL 159,090 735,300 $452,469 DAILY AVERAGE 436 2,014 $ 1,240 *New fee structure started April 1, 1996. cc: Ron Hagan Jim Engle %C—ITY'ADMIMSTRATOR'S WEEKLY REPORT �VL MAY 3, 1:996 TO: Honorable Mayor and Ci uncil -� FROM: 00 Michael T. Ube a, City Admi or DATE: May 3, 1996 r COMMUNrrY SERVICES 1. Main Promenade Parking Structure-Following are 1995 and 1996 downtown parking structure statistics for the last weekend in April: Fri. Fri. Sat. Sat. Sun. Sun. 4128195 4/26/96 4129195 4/27/96 4/30/95 4/28/96 2:00 PM 561 460 360 400 4:00 PM 258 398 321 418 307 340 6:00 PM 341 426 308 410 261 367 8:00 PM 408 480 558 387 200 347 10:00 PM 553 506 623 618 123 145 12:00 AM 424 319 410 420 29 65 2. Golf Tournament -The Eighth Annual City Go ament was held at Meadowlark Golf Course on Saturday, . One hundred golfers participated, and American Golf Corporatio yron Golf, and Rockin' Thredz generously donated items for the eve o Werth, Recreation Supervisor, Sr., put the popular CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S WEEKLY REPORT JUKE 28, 1996 UQ:A9q� Honorable Mayor and Council �UL �_ _,,;FROM:..:_: r:;; Michael T. Ub aga, City Administr / �_ DATE: June 28, 96 COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Main Promenade Parking Structure-Following are 1995 and 1996 downtown parking structure statistics for last weekend: Fri. Fri. Sat. Sat Sun. Sun. 6123195 6/21196 6124195 6/22/96 6125195 6/23/96 2:00 PM 376 725 588 543 556 4:00 PM 301 448 492 557 530 578 6:00 PM 415 485 464 602 394 482 8:00 PM 616 624 603 697 347 456 10:00 PM 733 580 615 669 275 278 12:00 AM 641 360 411 453 79 89 this past year in the Public Works aunt Division, the annual eac ont paint maintenance project was not completed as in previou ars. This year, only high priority areas were painted on about 35% of th chfront. The remainder was not painted and will, accordingly, show deteri on and extreme wear this summer. In addition, there were no resources to plete the annual sealing of the municipal pier. Beach maintenance staff will try ffset this deferred maintenance by more frequent washings of the pier. The J r Lifeguard Headquarters building was also not painted for this summer. Only o�Wiith f the park system's sports courts (basketball, racquetball, etc.)were painted ' year. the exception of graffiti being painted out, no park rest rooms were p ted. �1. 3 ATTACHMENT 10 c r CURRENT PARKING SUPPLY AND DEMAND BLOCK PARKING DEMAND* TOTAL PARKING PARKING RESTAURANT RETAIL OFFICE MISC.** DEMAND SUPPLY A 45 110 23 - 178 142 B 165 93 14 350 622 330 C 186 60 11 5 262 65 D 75 55 7 - 137 866 E - - 9 - 9 197 F 8 29 18 - 55 55 Sub Total 479 347 82 355 1,263 1,655 G - 36 18 - 54 , 73 H - 39 12 10 61 224 I 70 14 - 20 104 32 Sub Total 70 89 • 30 30 219 1 229 Total 1 549 436 112 385 1,482 1,984 Oct„ 1995 * Downtown Specific Plan Codified Parking Requirements ** Misc. ratio 1 :500 s,f, except theater 1 :5 seats and existing industrial 1 ;1000 s.f. 178 loci ATTACHMENT I I MASTER PLANNED PARKING SUPPLY AND DEMAND BLOCK PARKING DEMAND* TOTAL PARKING PARKING RESTAURANT RETAIL OFFICE MISC.** DEMAND SUPPLY A 152 124 40 - 316 142 B 212 111 16 350 689 330 C 199 149 22 - 370 65 D 33 96 3 - 132 866 E - 76 8 - 84 197 F 27 97 13 - 137 55 Sub Total 623 653 102 350 1 ,728 1 ,655 G - 63 9 - 72 73 H - 50 - - 50 224 1 79 6 - 21 106 32 Sub Total 79 119 9 21 228 229 Total 702 772 1 111 1 371 1,956 1,984 Oct„ 1995 * Downtown Specific Plan Codified Parking Requirements ** Misc, ratio 1 :500 s,f, except theater 1 :5 seats 179 � '- ATTACHMENT 12, Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 August 15, 1996 City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORT - DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN REQUEST: Annual review and monitoring report of the Downtown Parking Master Plan. LOCATION: Downtown Specific Plan (area generally bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Acacia Street, Second Street and Sixth Street) DATE OF ACTION: August 13, 1996 Your application was acted upon by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach on August 13, 1996, and your request was accepted as adequate and complete and will be forwarded to the City Council for their review. If there are any further questions, please contact Herb Fauland, Senior Planner at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, Howard Zelefsky, Secretary Planning Commission by: Scott Hess, AICP Senior Planner (pcc1057-13) Huntington Beach Department of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Howard Zelefsky, Planning DireV BY: Herb Fauland, Senior Planner DATE: August 13, 1996 SUBJECT: Annual Review and Monitoring Report- Downtown Parking Master Plan LOCATION: Downtown Specific Plan - (area generally bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Acacia St., Second St. and Sixth St.) STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On June 1, 1995, the revisions and update to the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) commonly referred to as the "Village Concept" became effective. As part of the revisions, a shared parking concept was prepared for the core area of Main St. (see Attachment No. 1). The shared parking concept is referred to as the Downtown Parking Master Plan (DTPMP). The DTPMP includes provisions that require the plan be reviewed on an annual basis and a monitoring report be sent to the Planning Commission, City Council and the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission The review and monitoring report contained herein is the first annual report on the DTPMP. The review was conducted from June 1, 1995 to June 1, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Accept as adequate and complete the annual review and monitoring report of the Downtown Parking Master Plan and forward to the City Council for their review." GENERAL INFORMATION: APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach- Planning Division REQUEST: Annual review and monitoring report of the Downtown Parking Master Plan DATE ACCEPTED: June 30, 1996 �r t2.Z PROJECT PROPOSAL: As noted, this is the first annual review and monitoring report of the DTPMP. The DTPMP is based on a shared parking concept. Shared parking in effect allows one (1) parking space to serve two (2) or more individual land uses without conflict. Shared parking relies on the variations in the peak parking demand for different uses. In other words, parking demands will fluctuate in relationship to the mix of uses by hour, day of week and season. The proper mix will create an interrelationship among different uses and activities which result in a reduction of the demand for parking. In the approval of the DTPMP, the California Coastal Commission imposed measures to ensure that adequate parking be provided for the proposed development threshold in the plan. The DTPMP has a maximum development threshold for uses to ensure the proper mix of uses and the proper function of the shared parking concept. The maximum development threshold is 500,000 sq. ft. with a commercial/retail threshold of 250,00 sq. ft., an office threshold of 100,000 sq. ft., a restaurant threshold of 100,000 sq. ft. and a miscellaneous threshold of 50,00 sq. ft. The 500,000 sq. ft. of development activity in the DTPMP shares 1,984 parking spaces (see Attachment Nos. 2 & 3). General Plan Conformance: The annual review and monitoring report is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and the Mixed Use and Mixed Vertical Land Use Element designations of the subject area. In addition, the DTPMP is consistent with the Coastal Element policies that state the following: 1. Study alternative mechanisms for improving parking in the Downtown; and 2. Ensure that adequate parking is provided in all new development in the coastal zone utilizing one or a combination of the following: a. Utilize new parking standards specific to the coastal zone in conjunction with the development of off-site parking strategies. Environmental Status: Code Amendment No. 92-5 the "Village Concept" amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan was covered under Environmental Impact Report No. 82-2 adopted by City Council Resolution No. 5284 on July 18, 1983. The DTPMP which was included as part of the code amendment was also covered by EIR No. 82-2. Coastal Status: The DTPMP is located within the Coastal Zone. As part of the annual review and monitoring report, the report shall be forwarded to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission for review. Redevelopment Status: The DTPMP is located within the Main Pier Redevelopment project area. Design Review Board: Not applicable. 4 ' Staff Report-8/13/96 2 (pcsr202) I L',05 Subdivision Committee: Not applicable. Other Departments Concerns: The Departments of Public Works, Economic Development, and Community Services have reviewed the annual review and report. No comments regarding the annual review and report were submitted. ANALYSIS: The purpose of the annual review and monitoring report is to monitor the building activity and land uses within the DTPMP. The DTPMP monitoring report requires a series of seven (7) checks. These checks are as follows: 1) amount and type of development square footage approved during the annual review period; 2) total amount of square footage in the Downtown Parking Master Plan area; 3) an inventory of existing parking spaces; 4) a parking utilization study; 5) an assessment of parking demand compared with parking supply; 6) a determination of whether adequate parking remains to serve development allowed up to the total development cap; and 7) the annual ieview and monitoring report shall be submitted to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission for review. A brief status report on each of the aforementioned checks is provided below. Approved Square Footage During the review period from June 1, 1995 to June 1, 1996, the city approved two projects which affected the overall square footage in the DTPMP. In addition, the city approved a number of restaurant uses for additional outdoor dining area. A brief outline of the approved uses follows: HULA GRILL - 221 MAIN ST. #F The DTPMP includes a mix of uses and building square footage for the building at 221 Main St. In establishing the Hula Grill, the applicant converted a portion of an existing 3,400 sq. ft. office suite into the approved restaurant use. The remaining area of the suite remains designated as office. The intensification of square footage from office use to restaurant use generates the need for additional parking. The approval of a 1,120 sq. ft. second floor restaurant use with 396 sq. ft. of balcony seating required the applicant to pay for 10 in-lieu fee parking spaces (10 spaces @ $1,000 per space = $10,000). The approved project required a minor shift in restaurant and office square footage in each land use category within the overall development threshold. The approved restaurant use recently opened for business. STANDARD MARKET - 126 MAIN ST. The DTPMP identified an 8, 875 sq. ft. building with 5,875 sq. ft. of commercial/retail and 3,000 sq. ft. of restaurant for the building at 126 Main St. The applicant requested a mix of 4,890 sq. ft. of commercial/retail and 4,584 sq. ft. of restaurant uses. The change in square footage per use requires the applicant to pay for six (6) in-lieu fee parking spaces (6 spaces @ $12,000 per space = $72,000). Please note, the City Council's final approval of the project will necessitate modifications to the building. The modifications will likely effect the overall square footage and mix of uses. To date, revised plans have not been submitted for review. Minor modifications to the development threshold may be required. Staff Report-8/13/96 3 (pcsr202) IZ .04 OUTDOOR DINING During the review period the city approved approximately 20 restaurant uses for outdoor dining. All 20 sites complied with code and maintain a total area of outdoor dining that does not require any additional parking. The total area of outdoor dining for the 20 approved sites is 4,683 sq. ft. (see Attachment No. 4). The DTSP allows outdoor dining and does not require additional parking if the outdoor area complies with the•stipulated area parameters. Since all sites comply with code, no additional parking is required and is noted only for informational purposes. Total Square Footage As noted, the DTPMP has an overall development threshold of 500,000 sq. ft. Within the overall threshold are thresholds of 100,000 sq. ft. for restaurant uses, 250,000 sq. ft. for commercial/retail uses, 100,000 sq. ft. for office uses, and 50,000 sq. ft. for miscellaneous uses. These threshold were established to ensure that the shared parking concept would function properly based upon the proper mix of uses. The DTPMP uses square footage and land use information gathered from 1994 (see Attachment No. 5). The review process has allowed staff to re-analyze the activity in the downtown since the original numbers were established. The development activity and change of uses in the downtown are within the established thresholds (see Attachment No. 6). The following is a comparison chart: 1994 Land Use Analysis (DTPMP) 1995 Land Use Analysis (REVIEW) (Occupied and Anticipated) (Occupied Only) Restaurant 101,302 sq. ft. 78,900 sq. ft. Retail 209,925 sq. ft. 122,400 sq. ft. Office 107,174 sq. ft. 97,200 sq. ft. Miscel. 40,575 sq. ft. 52,400 sq. ft. TOTALS 458,976 SQ. FT. 350,900 SQ. FT. The 1994 land use figures used in the DTPMP included occupancy levels of existing buildings as well as future structures (i.e., Main Pier Phase II, Third Block West) and their associated square footage. The 1995 review figures are only the occupied square footage of the existing buildings. The review indicates that the activity level is within the 1994 land use figures used in the DTPMP. One important factor in this review is the ability to shift square footage between land use categories. This allows the city to work within the overall development threshold of 500,000 sq. ft. Caution is necessary however, when shifting square footage between land use categories. The city needs to be aware that the balance that has been established by the thresholds for each land use category is very important.to the Staff Report-8/13/96 4 (pcsr202) 1 Z. 5 ability of the shared parking concept to work and function properly. Continued monitoring of the land uses and development activity is key to the success of the DTPMP. Inventory of Existing Parking As noted earlier, an inventory total of 1,984 parking spaces are shared in the DTPMP. This is indicated in the Downtown On-Site Parking Summary table (see Attachment No. 7). A number of incorrect totals for each block were noted and found in the original table. The incorrect information resulted in parking spaces credited for the wrong block. As part of the review process, corrections have been made to the inventory table. However, the total number of parking spaces (1,984) remains the same (see Attachment No. 8). Also, two of the outdoor dining uses (221 Main St. Suites A & B) were approved to remove four (4) on- street parking spaces. The approval to remove the four (4) spaces was conditioned upon participation in the in-lieu parking fee program. The applicant has paid his in-lieu parking fees (4 spaces @ $12,000 per space = $48,000) and just recently completed the removal of the four on-street parking spaces. Because the spaces have just been recently removed, they will be analyzed in next years review and monitoring report. Parking Utilization As part of the review process, the city continues to monitor the utilization of parking in the downtown. One of the main aspects of the monitoring program is the city's ability to monitor the city's parking structure. The 815 space Main Promenade Parking structure is monitored by the Community Services Department. The city charges for parking in the Main Promenade Parking structure from 10:00 AM to 2:00 AM. Validations are available to all businesses, as well as monthly and yearly parking passes. The current validation to paid parking ratio is four to one. This is the ratio that the city was trying to attain by the implementation of the most recent parking fee structure. Generally, the current turnover ratio in the parking structure is an hour and twenty minutes. Daily occupancy averages less than 20 percent before noon, 40 percent between noon and 4:00 PM, 60 percent between 4:00 PM and 10:00 PM, and less than 20 percent after 10:00 PM. The parking structure averages a-40-60 percent utilization over a one year period (see Attachment No. 9). As can be expected the summer months generate the highest occupancy percentage (60%) with the off season or winter months the lowest (40%). Also noted, Friday and Saturday evening between 8:00 PM and 12:00 midnight are the highest average occupancy (75%-80%) for the parking structure. During the summer months .and on selected holiday weekends (Memorial Day, July 4th, Pierfest, Labor Day) the parking structure has been full for brief periods of time. Staff also conducted spot field surveys of the 296 space parking structure under Pierside Pavilion. The spot surveys found that the second level of the parking structure is extremely underutilized. Staff noted 0- 10 parked cars on the second level with an overall utilization of the 296 space parking structure at approximately 25-40 percent. Improved use of the second level is being pursued by staff and the management company of Pierside Pavilion. Staff Report-8/13/96 5 (pcsr202) IZ0 Staff also reviewed the on-street parking spaces. The 492 on-street metered parking spaces are highly utilized and have a greater turn over ratio because they are metered to allow 15-20 minute intervals . The review found them to be used first, before the parking structure, and fully (100%) utilized. As noted, the City Council revised parking fees to put an emphasis on convenience rather than cost to park in the downtown,area. These new fees have been successful in encouraging beachgoers to park in recreational zones and residents to park in residential zones, thus freeing up the business zone for patrons of the downtown businesses. Business zone meters are divided into two types; short (20 minutes) and long term (2 hours). The short term meters are primarily in front of coffee shops and bakeries doing early morning business and requiring more frequent turnover than two hours. Parking Assessment A parking-supply and demand analysis was conducted to assess whether adequate parking is provided (see Attachment No. 10). The analysis was conducted based upon the 1984 existing parking spaces and the most recent mix of uses in the downtown. The analysis indicates that adequate parking is supplied for the current demand based upon the current mix of uses and the total amount of square footage allocated under the development threshold. The review requires the city to determine .if the parking supply will accommodate the Master Plan of land uses for the Downtown. The analysis indicates the overall Master Plan of land uses contained in the development thresholds will provide adequate parking (see Attachment No 11). This determination is based upon the demand generated by.the mix of land use within the Master Plan. Parking Determination Based upon the annual review and monitoring report, staff has determined that adequate parking is currently provided in the DTPMP. This finding is based upon the minimal building activity, the minor shifts in square footage; and the demonstration that the existing parking spaces continue to accommodate the current'mix of uses and activity in the downtown. Continued monitoring of the DTPMP and the careful allocation of the square footage for each land use category will ensure continued success for the DTPMP. Coastal Commission Review The DTPMP annual review and monitoring report shall be forwarded to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission. The report will be forwarded after the report is reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. , ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may continue the DTPMP annual review and monitoring report.for additional information. Staff Report-8/13/96 6 (pcsr202) a *7 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map - DTPMP 2. Downtown Parking Master Plan (DTSP - Section 4.2.14) ' 3. Supplemental Information by Reference (DTPMP approved by PC dated July 7, 1993) 4. Downtown Establishments with Outdoor Dining 5. DTPMP - Land Use Master Plan (July 1993) 6. DTPMP - Current Inventory of Land Uses (October 1995) 7. DTPMP - Downtown On-Site Parking Summary (July 1993) 8. DTPMP - Master Plan of Parking (July 1993) 9. Main Promenade Parking Structure Statistics July 1995 - June 1996 10. DTPMP - Current Parking Supply and Demand (October 1995) 11. DTPMP - Master Planned Parking Supply and Demand (October 1995) SH:HF:kjl Staff Report-8/13/96 7 (pcsr202) I Z. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, September 16, 1996, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following items: © 1 ANNUAL REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORT-DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN(DTPMP) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach, Community Development Department Request: First annual review and monitoring report of the Downtown Parking Master Plan. The review and report will include: 1) amount and type of development square footage approved during the annual review period; 2)total amount of square footage in the Downtown Parking Master Plan; 3)an inventory of existing parking spaces; 4)a parking utilization study; 5) an assessment of parking demand compared with parking supply; and 6)a determination that adequate parking remains to serve development allowed under the Parking Master Plan.. Location: Downtown Specific Plan (area generally bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Acacia Avenue, Second Street, and Sixth Street). Project Planner: Herb Fauland NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item# 1 is covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 82-2. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item# 1 is located in the Coastal Zone. As part of the annual review and monitoring report,the report shall be forwarded to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after September 11, 1996. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (cclg10916) CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST SUBJECT: Aww4rc vtgvo DEPARTMENT: C.40A AA , h(EV CI� . MEETING DATE: CONTACT: � PHONE: 8 N/A YES NO ( ) P4 ( ) Is the notice attached? ( ) ( ) Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council (and/or Redevelopment Agency)hearing? ( ) ( ) Are the date, day and time of the public hearing correct? ( ) ( ) If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,does the notice include appeal language? ( ) ( ) Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? ( ) ( ) Is a map attached for publication? ( ) ( ) Is a larger ad required? Size ( ) ( ) Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? ( ) ( ) Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing labels? t ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, are the resident labels attached? ( ) ( ) Is the Report 33433 attached? (Economic Development Dept. items only) Please complete the following: 1. Minimum days from publication to hearing date b* r� 2. Number of times to be published 3. Number of days between publications 21 .... ..................... d MEETING DATE: September 16, 1996 DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: REQUESTING: Community Development Downtown Parking Master Plan - Annual Review TODAY'S DATE 08/30/96 3:44 PM VERIFIED BY ADMININSTRATION: APPROVED BY: Ray Silver Assistant City Administrator 8/30/96 3:45 PM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Connie Brockway, City Clerk 4cl- FROM: Herb Fauland, Senior Planner DATE: September 2, 1996 SUBJECT: MAILING LABELS -ANNUAL REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORT OF THE DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN The attached mailing labels for the public hearing on the annual review for the Downtown Parking Master Plan have been staff generated. The annual review is not a mandatory public hearing and is being advertised only as a courtesy. The public most directly affected are those in the downtown. Staff is using the mailing labels for the Downtown City Council Subcommittee and any interested person who has requested notification. If you have any questions please call me at X5438. Thank you! xc: Melanie S. Fallon, Community Development Director (g:\hf\parking\brock 1) Downtown City Council SubCommittee Joyce Riddell, President Diane Baker Mailing Labels Chamber of Commerce HB Conference&Visitors Bureau 6/20/96 2100 Main Street Ste 200 101 Main Street Ste 2A Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Marie St. Germain Steve Daniels Judy Legan Downtown Residents Association Downtown Business Association HB/FV Board of Realtors 505 Alabama 200 Main Street No. 106 8101 Slater Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 President William Holman President Amigos De Bolsa Chica PLC Huntington Beach Tomorrow PO Box 3748 23 Corporate Plaza, Ste. 250 411 6th Street Huntington Beach, CA 92605 Newport Beach, CA 92660-7912 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 President,HB Historical Society Chairperson Patricia Koch c/o Newland House Museum Historical Resources Board HB Union High School District 19820 Beach Blvd. Community Services Department 102'51 Yorktown Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 David Hagen Dr. Duane Dishno Jerry Buchanan HB Union High School District HB City Elementary School District HB City Elementary School District 10251 Yorktown Avenue P.O. Box 71 P.O. Box 71 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Bob Mandic Jeff Bergsma Dick Harlow 16242 Pisbury Circle Team Design 211 -B Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92649 215 Main Street, Ste. A Huntington Beach,. CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Julie Gnadt Argus Commercial 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Ste. 100 Irvine, CA 92715 Council Me r Leipzig Council M err Dettloff Council Me Garofalo Send to all De ment Heads: G./ich D. Biggs M. Uberua C. M. Dolde Ray Sil r S. R. Loy� berg Ric arnard M L. es Franz R. . Hayden G:Jan\dwtn-cc\labels v CITY CLERK'S OFFICE OF 2000 Main Street, HUNTINGTON BEACH Huntington Beach, CA 92648 • Date: Number of pages including cover sheet: _ HUNTINGTON BEACH FAX To: From: �rz�' Connie Brockway, CMC, City Clerk By: �ac. Deputy City Clerk Phone: Fax phone: 6((6 - Sbag Phone: 714-536-32zt-7 -Tao Fax phone: 714-374-1557 REMARKS: [ Urgent ❑ For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please comment RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Community Development Department SUBJECT: Annual Review-Downtown Parking Master Plan COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 16, 1996 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Attached Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable :> EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS REVIEWED RETURNED FORWARDED. Administrative Staff Assistant City Administrator Initial ,Pp City Administrator Initial City Clerk EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM: Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use ON FILE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Downtown Huntington Beach PARKING MASTER PLAN ON FILE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Planning Commission Approved July 7, 1993