HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile 1 of 3 - Public Hearing - General Plan Amendment 97-1 - Council/Agency Meeting Held:
Deferred/Continued to: C"
iFprove ❑ Con di Tonally Approved enied 4 0, ity Clerk's Signature
Council Meeting Date: December 14, 1998 Department ID Number: CD98-56
sEW A/"r P4019:5
ORiDin�w CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH � y
. Al
Qcj,,0jr . 1 f 4)CI ci REQUEST FOR ACTION
foreen, bArr»ahj 6101h,V4 n IIr'o, 491, /• k a . 3�/,q
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, City Adminis °etv
PREPARED BY: HOWARD ZELEFSKY, Planning Director :�
DAVID BIGGS, Economic Development Director
SUBJECT: APPROVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 97-
1/GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-1/APPEAL OF ZONING
MAP AMENDMENT NO. 97-1 (Crest View School Site)
Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachments)
Statement of Issue:
Transmitted for your consideration is Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1, General Plan
Amendment No. 97-1, and an appeal of Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1 filed by Arnel
Retail Group, applicant, of the Planning Commission's denial of a request to amend the
land use designations at the approximately 13.89 acre Crest View School site. Crest View
School is located on the south side of Talbert Avenue, approximately 300 feet east of
Beach Boulevard. The General Plan Land Use Map is proposed to be amended from P
(RL-7) (Public with an underlying land use designation of Low Density Residential) to CG-
F1 (General Commercial-maximum floor area ratio of 0.35). The Zoning Map Amendment
is proposed to be amended from PS (Public-Semipublic) to CG (General Commercial).
Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 was prepared pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and analyzes the potential impacts associated with the
proposed General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments.
The Planning Commission recommends denial (Recommended Action - A) because the
land use amendments will adversely affect the General Plan.
Staff is recommending that the City Council overturn the Planning Commission's denial
and approve the proposed land use and zoning amendments (Recommended Action — B).
Funding Source: Not applicable.
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
Recommended Action:
A. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to:
1. "Uphold the Planning Commission's denial and deny Environmental Impact Report No.
97-1/ General Plan Amendment No. 97-1/ Appeal of Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1
with findings (ATTACHMENT NO. 1)."
Planning Commission Action on October 27, 1998:
THE MOTION MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY KERINS, TO DENY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 97-1/GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-1/
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 97-1, WITH FINDINGS, AND MAINTAIN THE SITE AS
PUBLIC SPACE (ATTACHMENT NO. 1) CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: LIVENGOOD, KERINS, TILLOTSON, INGLEE
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: SPEAKER, BIDDLE, CHAPMAN
ABSTAIN: NONE
MOTION PASSED
B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to:
1. "Overturn the Planning Commission's denial and certify Environmental Impact Report
No. 97-1 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requir�e,gents with a
Statement of Overriding Considerati ns by ado ting Resolution No.Q - (Attachment
No. 2)�RdoPTe/� a s Q endea(. is 9P- 71O stat�ei F�'oo y ar�.cJ•{�;�c�
f 47Cab/e, vr&JCS /a /d-o'ID o .,0WA A%0 i�.3 C`h5�i4/r1�4�/ vt>l.�/✓R+✓�6/'t�w�✓o�
2. "Overturn the Planning Commission's denial and approve Ge.Vera
Plan Amend nt No.
97-1 by adopting Resolution No.!� (Attachment No. 3) PPRo✓w 3
3. "Overturn the Planning Commission's denial and approve Appeal of Zoning Map
Amendment No. 97-1 with findings (Attachment No. 4) by g- Ordinance No.
D (Attachment No. 5)" a-P�m✓'
Ty""vd&�'4), cyjc vra✓ed-.
CD98-56 -2- 12/09/98 8:21 AM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-66
Alternative Action(s):
The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s):
1. "Approve Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 and one of the following alternatives
listed in Section 6.0 of the EIR:
a. Alternate Site Plan — reconfigure the site and move the building to the west, backing
to the commercial uses along Beach Boulevard with the three satellite buildings
along Talbert Avenue on the east side of the site, or
b. Combined Residential and Park Use — approximately one-half of the site would be
developed with multi-family residential and the other one-half would be developed
with recreational open space, or
c. Low Density Residential — the entire site would be developed with low-density
residential, maximum 7 units to the net acre or approximately 96 units.
2. "Continue Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1/General Plan Amendment No. 97-
1/Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1 and direct staff accordingly."
Analysis:
A. PROJECT PROPOSAL:
Applicant/
Appellant: Mr. Greg McClelland
Arnel Retail Group
949 South Coast Drive, Suite 600
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Location: 18052 Lisa Lane (Closed Crest View School/South of Talbert Avenue,
approximately 300 feet east of Beach Boulevard)
General Plan Amendment No. 97-1 represents a request to amend the current general
plan designation on a 13.89 acre site from P (RL-7) (Public with an underlying land use
designation of Low Density Residential) to CG-F1 (General Commercial-maximum floor
area ratio of 0.35) pursuant to California State Law and the General Plan of the City of
Huntington Beach (Attachment No. 6).
CD98-56 -3- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
The existing Public (P) land use designation allows governmental administrative and
related facilities, such as public utilities, schools, parking lots, infrastructure, religious and
similar uses. The underlying Low Density Residential designation allows single family
residential units, clustered zero lot line development, and "granny" flats at a maximum
density not to exceed seven units to the net acre.
The proposed land use category of General Commercial (FAR 0.35) allows retail
commercial, professional offices, eating and drinking establishments, household goods,
food sales, drugstores, building materials and supplies, personal services, recreational
commercial, overnight accommodations, cultural facilities, government offices, educational,
health, institutional and similar uses. The maximum floor area ratio permitted is 0.35
based upon a net lot area calculation.
In addition, Table LU-4, Subarea 6g of the General Plan will be expanded to include the
proposed site. Subarea 6g is the General Commercial District and allows general
commercial/retail uses at a maximum height of two (2) stories. Design and development
criteria include standards to encourage the design and siting of structures to achieve a high
level of quality and to ensure compatibility with existing uses.
Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1 represents a request to amend the current zoning
designation of PS (Public-Semipublic) to CG (General Commercial) pursuant to Section
247.06 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (Attachment No. 6).
The existing zoning designation for the school site is Public-Semipublic (PS). This
designation permits large public and semipublic uses such as, but not limited to: Cemeteries,
Government Offices, Hospitals, Maintenance and Service Facilities, Religious Assembly,
Schools (private or public), Utilities (minor and major), Eating and Drinking Establishments,
Vehicle/Equipment Sales and Services, etc.
Development standards require a minimum parcel size of 2 acres, minimum lot width of 100
feet, maximum building height of 50 feet, maximum FAR of 1.5, and minimum of 8%
landscaping. Additional requirements are identified in Chapter 214, Public-Semipublic
Districts.
The proposed zoning designation is General Commercial (CG) District. This proposed
designation permits the full range of retail and service businesses such as but not limited to:
Group Residential, Community and Human Services, Convalescent Facilities, Day Care,
Heliports, Hospitals, Religious Assembly, Retail Commercial Sales, Schools (private or
public), Utilities (minor or major), etc.
Development standards require a minimum lot size of 10,000 sq. ft., minimum lot width 100
feet, maximum building height of 50 feet, maximum FAR of 1.5, and minimum of 8%
landscaping. Additional requirements are identified in Chapter 211, Commercial Districts.
CD98-56 -4- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
i
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 represents an analysis of potential
environmental impacts associated with the proposed general plan amendment, zoning
map amendment, conditional use permit, and tentative parcel map. These applications
represent a request to amend the current Public/Semi-Public land use and zoning
designations and to allow for the development of a Wal-Mart and three ancillary
retail/restaurant pads.
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-70/Variance No. 98-18/Sign Code Exception No 98-7/
Tentative Parcel Map No. 97-161/Design Review Board No. 97-8 are associated with
the project but not presented to the Council at this time. These applications represent a
request to develop a 130,342 square foot Wal-Mart with an 8,158 square foot garden
center as well as three other retail/restaurant pads ranging in size from 3,500 to 5,500
square feet. Due to the Planning Commission's denial of the proposed land use
amendments described above, there was no action taken on the development proposal.
Therefore, the actual development portion of the request is not subject to City Council
review and will not be presented for consideration.
B. BACKGROUND:
1. Project History
The land use and zoning changes are proposed at the closed Crest View Elementary
School within the Ocean View School District (OVSD) boundaries. The school was opened
in 1961 and closed by OVSD in 1992 due to decreased enrollment and a projected decline
in the student population. The Crest View School is one of 21 school sites throughout the
City which are no longer in operation as public schools, are used for private purposes, or
have been developed.
As required by State Law (Government Code Section 65402 (c) and 54220 et. seq.), prior
to leasing any school site the governing school board must first offer to sell or lease that
portion of the school site to the City within which the land is located. In late 1993, in
accordance with the Naylor Act, the OVSD notified the City of its intent to dispose of the
13.89 acre site and provided the City first right of refusal to purchase the property. Upon
review of the offer and an analysis of the City's needs, the City declined to purchase the
site on November 15, 1993. Subsequently, the OVSD pursued agreements to lease the
site. A chronology of the steps taken to comply with State Law was prepared by the OVSD
Superintendent, Dr. James Tarwater (Attachment No. 17). The School District proceeded
with Requests for Proposals (RFP) to solicit developers for the surplus school site. The
City and School District worked together in an attempt to identify the appropriate type of
development for the site that could achieve the objectives for both. In contemplating
development on the site, the City, the Ocean View School District, and the applicant, Arnel
Retail Group, established the following objectives:
CD98-56 -5- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
City's Objectives
• Create a development compatible with, and sensitive to, existing surrounding land uses
in the project area.
• Promote the development of commercial "big box" buildings and ancillary uses that
convey a high-quality visual image and character.
• Provide for necessary transportation improvements and strategies to accommodate the
demands of new and existing development.
• Balance projected costs and services of new development with adequate revenues
generated by new development.
• Balance the City's immediate needs for commercial property, but also maintain long-
term needs for adequate open space and recreational areas.
• Ensure adequate utility infrastructure and public services for new development, and
ensure that timing and funding of improvements are closely correlated with
development phasing.
• Enhance the community image of Huntington Beach through the design and
construction of a high-quality, state-of-the-art development.
• Mitigate the potential impacts to the surrounding area to the greatest extent possible,
while still allowing for a market-driven commercial development.
Ocean View School District(OVSD) Objectives
• Develop a revenue stream to adequately sustain and improve school facilities.
Implement the OVSD's Board of Trustees decision to negotiate a long-term lease for
the Crest View site.
• Use income derived from the Crest View lease for the following projects:
Major capital improvements;
- Heating/venting/air conditioning;
- Roofs;
- Modernization of facilities;
- Reopening of schools; and,
- New construction.
Applicant's Objectives
• Amend the City's General Plan and process a Zone Change to allow development of
general commercial land uses on the approximate 13.89-acre site.
• Develop a retail center to provide goods and services to the community, create jobs,
and generate increased property and sales taxes to benefit the City of Huntington
Beach.
• Offer retail merchandise at a scope and price not currently offered in the trade area.
• Capture a portion of the retail market that is currently traveling outside of the City of
Huntington Beach.
• Complement and enhance the existing retail uses located on Beach Boulevard.
• Create an attractive, viable project, and realize a reasonable return on investment.
CD98-56 -6- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
2. General Plan History:
General Plan history began on the Crest View School site in 1987 when Land Use Element
No. 87-1 was proposed on the property. Even though the school was in operation at the
time, the Redevelopment Agency proceeded with a request to amend the general plan
from Community Facilities-Education with underlying Low Density Residential to General
Commercial. As part of the Redevelopment Agency's plans for the Beach Boulevard
Corridor Project, staff analyzed the possibility of a commercial land use on the site, which
could tie into the somewhat marginal adjacent shopping center. The project was ultimately
withdrawn and land use designations remained as is.
The City then began a comprehensive update of the City's General Plan in 1991. As part
of the update effort, a General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) made up of community
representatives was appointed by the City Council. GPAC was charged with analyzing
and recommending general plan designations throughout the City, including the Crest View
School. The GPAC recommended to the Planning Commission that the west one-half of
the total site be amended to General Commercial and that the east one-half of the site be
designated as Low Density Residential.
During the General Plan update process, Planning staff recommended that the entire
school site along with the properties fronting Beach Blvd. be re-designated as General
Commercial and that a Specific Plan overlay designation be added. The recommendation
by staff was to require future development to be integrated, provide reciprocal vehicular
and pedestrian access, require a common urban design and architectural theme, and
provide buffers from adjacent single family residential uses. Through the update process,
the Planning Commission and City Council decided not to re-designate the site to
commercial and maintained the existing general plan designation of P - RL-7 (Public with
underlying Low Density Residential). The decision was based upon a need to
comprehensively review any development proposal and mitigate to the greatest extent
possible potential impacts to the surrounding land uses. By not amending the general plan
on Crest View during the comprehensive general plan update, any proposal for future
development would require a general plan amendment, zoning map amendment, and
specific environmental review.
C. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS AND RECOMMENDATION FOR DENIAL:
On August 11, 1998, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed land
use amendments as well as the request to develop the Crest View property with a Wal-
Mart and three ancillary retail/restaurant pads. Approximately 33 people spoke in
opposition to the project and described a myriad of concerns with the proposed
development. Speakers discussed their concerns with loss of open school fields, traffic, air
CD98-56 -7- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
quality, noise, aesthetics, improving access to Lambert Park, decrease of property values,
poor drainage conditions in the area, shade impacts, crime, loss of available school sites,
impacts to other local small businesses, estimated revenue projections, and compatibility
with the cemetery and church across Talbert Avenue as well as the adjacent residential
neighborhood. Numerous letters and petitions both in support and in opposition to the
project were received.
The applicant and their representatives, as well as the Ocean View School District
Superintendent, spoke in support of the project and discussed the positive benefits of the
project, the reasons for closure of the school, the process followed during closure
procedures, and the school district's need for additional revenue sources. The applicant
presented a revised truck loading and unloading site plan design during the public hearing
and urged the Planning Commission to approve the project. However, the applicant
disputed several of the conditions of approval recommended by staff. In general, the
applicant was opposed to fully enclosing and relocating the delivery dock facility to the
north side of the building, improving access to Lambert Park, limiting the square footage
devoted to display of non-taxable sales items, restricting outdoor sales displays, designing
pedestrian links between the satellite pads and Wal-Mart, restricting delivery hours, and
providing raised landscape medians within Talbert Avenue.
The Planning Commission continued the project to the September 9, 1998 Planning
Commission meeting, with the public hearing closed, due to the late hour and to allow staff
to respond to some of the issues raised during the public hearing.
Subsequently, on September 9, 1998, the Planning Commission continued the project to
the October 27, 1998 Planning Commission meeting at the applicant's request.
On October 27, 1998, the Planning Commission reviewed the request for amendments to
the land use designations. After lengthy discussions, the Planning Commission voted to
deny the environmental impact report, general plan amendment, and zoning map
amendment. Overall, the Planning Commission determined that commercial retail sales
were not an appropriate land use for the site and that they believed the site would better
serve the community as open space. Specifically, the Planning Commission found the
request inconsistent with General Plan Policy LU 13.1.6 which "Encourages surplus
schools and other public properties to be made available first for other public purposes,
such as parks,...." The Planning Commission also determined that the surrounding
neighborhood is deficient in park area and that "The complete loss of 9.0 acres of open
space that can be converted to park uses does not meet the City's policies and goals for
parks and open space." In addition, the Planning Commission stated that providing access
to Lambert Park would not sufficiently mitigate the loss of open space (Attachment No. 1).
CD98-56 -8- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
D. APPEAL:
The Planning Commission's recommendation for denial of the land use amendments
automatically forwards the environmental impact report and general plan amendment
applications to the City Council for review. However, pursuant to Section 247.12 of the
Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Code, the Planning Commission's denial of the zoning
map amendment terminates the application unless it is appealed to the City Council for
action. Therefore, although the City Council will review the environmental impact report
and general plan amendment requests, the appeal is associated only with the zoning map
amendment. The applicant appealed the zoning map amendment so that the Council
could review and act on the request to amend the land use designations concurrently
(Attachment No. 7).
E. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION:
There are several issues discussed in conjunction with the proposed amendments and
DEIR. They include land use compatibility, open space, traffic and circulation, air quality,
public utilities and services, economic development, general plan conformance, statement
of overriding considerations, and alternatives analyzed in the DEIR.
The most significant issue from a General Plan standpoint is whether the project's
economic benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects related to the loss of open
space and air quality impacts. These issues are addressed in the project EIR, the Analysis
section of this report, and the Statement of Overriding Considerations. A discussion of
each of the topical areas follows:
1. Land Use Compatibility
The subject site is bounded by single family residential (RL-7) to the south and east, with
general commercial (CG F1) to the west and an arterial highway (Talbert Avenue) to the
immediate north. Across Talbert Avenue is a cemetery that is general planned Open
Space-Park (OS-P). The proposed land use and zoning of commercial on a site that is
approximately 13.89 acres and has arterial frontage is a basic planning principle in land
use analysis. However, the adjacency of single family residential requires further analysis
due to concerns of potential impacts. This type of land use and zoning pattern is found
throughout the city and has resulted in land use compatibility issues. In response, the city
has adopted a number of land use policies to buffer commercial uses from and protect
residential neighborhoods and also allow for the future development of commercial uses
that contribute to the fiscal viability of the city. The commercial designation is the
appropriate land use and zoning for the site generally because of its size and location.
The zoning regulations (CG) require new construction to be subject to a conditional use
permit with a public hearing. The conditional use permit review and analysis requires the
future development to mitigate to the greatest extent possible any impacts to the adjacent
single family residential and also allow for market driven development.
CD98-56 -9- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
2. Open Space
The potential impacts to open space are analyzed in detail in the environmental section of
this report (Page 28) and the DEIR.
3. Traffic and Circulation
The commercial land use designation will generate additional daily vehicle trips. As part of
any future development proposal, implementation of circulation improvements consistent
with the Circulation Element's goals and policies are designed to mitigate traffic impacts
and maintain levels of service on the surrounding street system. General Plan policies
require development access and incorporation of reciprocal access to mimize circulation
impacts. In addition, all future development projects contribute Traffic Impact Fees to
mitigate long-term area-wide and cumulative project impacts. A detailed analysis of the
project specific traffic and circulation impacts is discussed in the DEIR.
4. Air Quality
The land use change to commercial with a floor area ratio of 0.35 will allow development
potential up to 175,000 square feet and result in the exceedance of South Coast Air
Quality Magagement District's daily threshold levels. Virtually all project sites with this
development potential and size within the air basin will or currently exceed air quality
standards. This is a significant unavoidable environmental impact that can not be
mitigated. A Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted in order to approve
the land use amendments.
5. Public Utilities and Services
The proposed land use and zoning amendments to commercial will increase the demand
for fire protection and police protection services. According to the Fire Department,
however, existing personnel, equipment, and facilities can meet the demands for the
development. The Police Department indicates that no additional equipment or facilities
are necessary, but that 0.57 of an additional officer will be required to adequately serve the
project. Based on the fiscal analysis prepared for the project, the potential development of
the site for a commercial big box retail use will result in a net fiscal surplus. The
anticipated revenues from property and sales tax revenues are anticipated to cover the
cost of additional government services.
CD98-56 -10- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
OVSD has determined that Crest View will not be needed to accommodate existing or
future students. The elimination of the project site as a potential future school, therefore, is
not considered a significant impact. The project will beneficially impact the school district
by generating a long-term revenue stream from the ground lease. The revenue is to be
used for capital improvements and other projects at existing schools within the district.
Adequate service capacities are available to provide commercial development with
electrical, natural gas, communication, and solid waste services. Similarly, the
development can connect with the existing sewer collection and treatment systems, which
have adequate capacities to serve the project.
Commercial development will create a water demand that is in excess of existing and
former uses (the school) at the site, and will combine with other related projects to further
impact the City's water system, which is already deficient. The project demand, however,
can be met with planned improvements included in the City's Water Master Plan. Payment
of a Capital Facilities Charge by the applicant in accordance with the Water Master Plan
will contribute toward implementation of required, long-term system improvements.
In terms of fire flow capacity, computer simulations for maximum day conditions for a
commercial use show that available capacity to serve the project site is estimated to be
slightly less than that required by City standards. Available capacity is estimated to be
3,814 gallons per minute (gpm) at 20 pounds per square inch compared to a requirement
of 4,000 gpm. The Fire Department has concluded that this capacity is acceptable.
6. Economic Development
Discussion of background economic issues and the City's economic development goals
and objectives are set forth in Attachment No. 10. For purposes of the action before the
City Council, staff has endeavored to focus on providing a clear picture of the economic
benefits of the project.
Illustrated below is a table that summarizes the range economic benefit from the site,
including a net impact estimate given likely impacts, both positive and negative, on existing
businesses. In addition, should the City Council ultimately decide to provide any of the
requested revenue sharing to either or both the School District and/or the Developer, a
revenue sharing range is indicated that can be subtracted from the net economic benefit
figures.
CD98-56 -11- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
Economic Benefit Estimate
Low High
Crest View Site Revenues (1)
Sales Tax (2)
Wal-Mart (no tare/lube, 138,490 $ 348,982 $ 397,800
sq ft.)
3 pads 46,000 46,000
Property Tax 41,048 41,048
Other Revenues (utility users tax, 3,184 3,184
business license, etc )
Total Revenues $ 439,214 $ 488,032
Impact on Existing HB Businesses
Estimated transfer from existing HB 70,000 70,000
businesses (i e , Target, K-Mart)
Estimated increases for existing HB 50,000 50,000
businesses (i.e , Auto Dealers, Five
Points)
Total Impact on Existing HB Businesses <20,000> <20,000>
Net Crest View Site Revenues 419,214 468,032
Service Costs (3) (Police, Fire, etc.) <60,854> <60,854>
Net Economic Benefit After Service Costs 358,360 407,178
Revenue Sharing Range (4) <80,000> <90,0000>
1) Estimate from Stanley R Hoffman Associates, April 10, 1998 (Attachment No 9),
adjusted by staff to reflect elimination of tire and lube and reduction in store size to
138,490 square feet
2) This figure assumes 10% non-taxable sales at Wal-Mart
3) Stanley R Hoffman Associates, April 10, 1998
4) Allowance for pending requests from School District for revenue sharing and the
Developer for repayment of Traffic Impact Fees overtime from project generated
General Fund sales tax revenues, memorandum of August 17, 1998, from
Economic Development Director
CD98-56 -12- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
During the various Planning Commission workshops and hearings on this project, a
number of questions regarding economic-related issues were raised by Planning
Commissioners and the public These questions and issues were responded to in the five
primary documents listed below and are attached.
1) Economic Development Section of Planning Commission staff report from August
11, 1998 (Attachment No 10)
2) Power Point presentation from Planning Commission meeting of September 111h
(Attachment No 11)
3) Memorandum dated August 17, 1998, from Economic Development Director
(Attachment No 12)
4) Memorandum dated September 3, 1998, from Economic Development Director
(Attachment No 13)
5) Memorandum dated October 6, 1998 from Economic Development Director
(Attachment No 14)
Since many of the questions have focused on the accuracy of the financial projections,
staff and our financial consultants have focused on refining the projections An analysis of
specific historical sales tax data for ten California communities has validated the
assumptions used in above table. In particular, Wal-Marts were analyzed in six urbanized
cities that demonstrated that the per square foot sales estimate used for Huntington Beach
is below the average In three of these examples, where data was available, general
merchandise sales increased 1 6 to more than 3 times the Wal-Mart sales alone Second,
data for four different cities indicated positive overall improvement in general merchandise
sales following the introduction of Wal-Mart
While it is impossible to precisely predict the ultimate impact of the Wal-Mart, staff and our
consultants believe it will be within the range indicated above.
7. General Plan Conformance
The proposed land use amendments have been analyzed and are consistent with the
goals, objectives, and policies of the City's General Plan The discussion below identifies
specific goals and policies of various elements of the General Plan applicable to the
proposed land use amendments and explores how the project meets the General Plan
objectives In addition, a detailed discussion of the project's conformity with goals,
policies, and objectives of the General Plan is presented in Section 5 0 E Environmental
Impact Analysis - Land Use of the Draft EIR pages 53-74
CD98-56 -13- 12/08/98 3.18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
A. Economic Development Element
Goal ED 1: Provide economic opportunities for present and future Huntington Beach
residents and businesses through employment and local fiscal stability
Objective ED 1.1. Enhance the City's market potential in terms of retail, office, industrial,
and visitor serving activity This would allow Huntington Beach to provide for retail, office,
and industrial opportunities that serve the current and projected population and enhance
sales and occupancy tax revenue
Policy ED 1 1.3: Create an Economic Development Strategy that. a) is based on the most
recent growth and economic forecasts, b) reflects both the City perspective and the
business community perspective for economic development, and c) is updated and
reviewed tri-annually
Objective ED 1.2: Seek to create a cumulative economic growth the provides a balance
throughout the City
Policy ED 1 2.1- Through the use of the Economic Development Strategy, the City may
determine the need for a fiscal impact analysis as part of the development review process
Objective ED 2.1- Maximize the economic development services provided by the City to
existing and prospective Huntington Beach businesses and industries
Objective ED 2 4. Revitalize, renovate and expand the existing Huntington Beach
commercial facilities while attracting new commercial uses
Policy ED 2.4.1. Encourage and assist existing and potential commercial owners to
modernize and expand their commercial properties.
Policy ED 2.4.2: Seek to capture the "new growth" businesses such as, but not limited to
a telecommuting,
b "shop for value" or " big box" stores;
c entertainment-commercial developments,
d. knowledge-based retail and entertainment-information retail uses, and
e high sales tax producing businesses
CD98-56 -14- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
Policy ED 2.4 3. Encourage the expansion of the range of goods and services provided in
Huntington Beach to accommodate the needs of all residents in Huntington Beach and the
market area
Commercial development of the site is anticipated to improve fiscal stability and provide
economic opportunities for the City, and is therefore consistent with the goals included in
this element.
B. Land Use Element
Goal LU 1: Achieve development that maintains or improves the City's fiscal viability and
reflects economic demands while maintaining and improving the quality of life for the
current and future residents of Huntington Beach
Goal LU 10. Achieve the development of a range of commercial uses
Po/icy LU 13.1 6. Encourage surplus schools and other public properties to be made
available first for other public purposes, such as parks, open space, adult or child care, and
secondarily for reuse for private purposes and/or other land uses and development.
Policy LU 13.1.7. The type intensity and density for reuse and/or development of surplus
school sites shall be determined by the following
a compatibility with the type and character of adjacent uses,
b. integration with adjacent commercial uses through the use of such amenities as
common automobile access and reciprocal access agreements, consistent
architectural treatment and pedestrian connections,
c the land use designations and policies for surrounding properties as defined by this
plan,
d formulation and approval of an appropriate site plan,
e working with residents of surrounding neighborhoods in the formulation of a reuse
plan, and
CD98-56 -15- 12/08/98 3.18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
f the utilization of appropriate design features, such as, but not limited to
• the maintenance of active, usable open space for use by the surrounding
neighborhood,
• the provision of buffering, such as open space areas or landscaping between
new development and existing development, and
• compliance with the applicable Design and Development Standards specified in
the General Plan
The proposed project is consistent with the land use goals to improve the City's fiscal
viability, achieve the development of a range of commercial uses, and to provide jobs and
commercial services in proximity to residents The project will also be adequately served
by transportation and utility infrastructure and public services
C Growth Management Element
Goal GM 1: Ensure that adequate transportation and public facilities and public services
are provided for existing and future residents of the city
The proposed project will not result in significant impacts to traffic The developer will be
required to contribute Traffic Impact Fees (proportional to the trips generated by the
project) which will be used to implement area-wide circulation improvements
D Circulation Element
Goal CE 2: Provide a circulation system which supports existing, approved and planned
land uses throughout the city while maintaining a desired level of service on all streets and
at all intersections
The proposed project is consistent with the goals of the Circulation Element The project
will not result in decreasing area intersections to less than acceptable standards and will
provide off-site parking in excess of minimum requirements It is consistent with the goal to
provide a balanced transportation system, since it will provide economic development
opportunities, provide mitigation for environmental impacts to surrounding residential
areas, and comply with the City's Transportation Demand Management Ordinance
CD98-56 -16- 12/08/98 3.18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
E. Utilities Element
Goal U 5: Maintain and expand service provisions to City of Huntington Beach residences
and businesses.
The proposed project will require upgrading and extensions of local utilities and
infrastructure to serve the project The costs of these improvements will be borne by the
developer, and the improvements will not adversely affect surrounding land uses The
proposal, therefore, is consistent with the General Plan goals within this element
8 Statement of Overnding Considerations.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15093 allows decision makers to
balance the adverse impacts of a proposed project with the overall merits of a project
Specifically, the CEQA Guidelines state
a) "CEQA requires the decision making agency to balance, as applicable, the
economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project
against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to
approve the project If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or
other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse
environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered
"acceptable "
b) Where the decision of the public agency allows the occurrence of significant
effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially
lessened the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its
action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record
c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement
should be included in the record of the project approval and should be
mentioned in the Notice of Determination "
Although there are adverse impacts to the environment that cannot be mitigated or
avoided, the City Council may still approve a project if a Statement of Overriding
Considerations is adopted In this particular case, staff believes the economic and social
benefits of the proposed project outweigh the adverse impacts to land use and air quality
The reasons for the proposed Statement of Overriding Considerations are listed below
(Attachment No 2, Exhibit A).
CD98-56 -17- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial for up to
a maximum of 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development, are
consistent with and implement City of Huntington Beach Resolution No 96-57, adopted
by the City Council on July 1, 1996 This resolution encourages consideration of
applications for commercial development on large parcels of land adjacent to major
arterial highways or other vacant or underutilized parcels in the City, including
vacant/surplus school sites, or any other vacant or underutilized sites or parcels in the
City of Huntington Beach
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial will
increase employment opportunities in the City of Huntington Beach including short-term
construction employment and long-term employment opportunities associated with
potential future construction of up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial
development
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial and a
potential for up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development will
generate lease revenue for the Ocean View School District, which will utilize the funds
for facilities and programs within the Ocean View School District
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial and a
potential for up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development will
contribute toward revitalization of marginal commercial uses in the area and will serve
as a catalyst to stimulate other business opportunities and widen the employee base of
the community.
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial and a
potential for up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development will
have a positive fiscal effect on the City of Huntington Beach It will generate substantial
additional revenues (assuming a future project condition of approval limiting a
maximum of 10% of "big box" floor area devoted to display of non-taxable sales items)
to the City of Huntington Beach
9 Alternative Action Analysis.
A range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed project was analyzed in the EIR
pursuant to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act The discussion of
alternatives focuses on alternatives capable of eliminating any significant adverse
environmental effects or reducing them to a level of insignificance, even if these
alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives or would
be more costly
CD98-56 -18- 12/08/98 3.18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
• Alternative "A" - Alternate Site Plan — Reconfiguration of the site plan to locate
the Wal-Mart on the west side of the site, thereby backing to commercial uses
instead of residential uses. Essentially, this plan would be an east/west reversal of
the proposed plan as shown below:
ww sxEPHERD cEMETERY
----" ----- TALBERT AVENUE
--- -
�A
I � t rrt nr .mr�,we
� j � t u.�u it v. ►wv.
III III PLL 1 — i ! _ _
III III PMB oa/I t E �, ; ""' `-�' ti
. I
I�Q III -IIW III � nit
I0 III
m III a
I m III
t
�l I
a .
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
CD98-56 -19- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
• Alternative "B" — Combined Residential and Park Use - Approximately one-half
of the site would be developed as multi-family housing, and the remainder of the site
would be improved for open space recreational use as shown below:
w
i
;; `; TALBERT AVENUE -r-
O
p r )J-rJ
O OPEN SPACE ,
JdlrJr V1tW afMf&/IRr JCN00t OD
D ; M
m 0.
LAVA[
. 'b' MULTI-FAMILY
w O
m IN.x.JJ
O RESIDENTIAL
I
w
k
"" EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
• Alternative "C" — Low Density Housing (Development Under Existing General
Plan and Zoning) - Entire site would be developed as low-density housing at a
maximum density of 7 dwelling units per acre for a total of up to 96 units. It is
estimated that the site would actually yield approximately 72 acres when designed
for streets and dedication of a 1.25 acre park.
CD98-56 -20- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
A summary analysis of environmental impacts for each of these alternatives compared to
the proposed project is included as Table S-2, Pages S-27 through Page S-29 of the Draft
EIR As shown, based on the analysis, each of the alternatives was determined to be
environmentally superior to the proposed land use and zoning amendments and the
development project (CUP 97-70) As discussed in Section 6 0, D , the No Project
alternative was determined to be the most environmentally superior alternative Among
the other alternatives, Alternative "B," Development of Combined Residential and Park
Use, would result in the greatest reduction in impacts compared to the proposed project
This alternative would reduce the most critical impacts of the project, including land use,
transportation, air quality, noise, aesthetics, and recreation-related impacts Similar to the
No Project Alternative, all impacts under Alternative "B" could be mitigated to a less than
significant level, compared to the proposed project, which would result in significant
unavoidable impacts to air quality and land use compatibility
Table S-3, Page S-30 of the Draft EIR summarizes the ability of each alternative to meet
the primary objectives of the proposed land use and zoning amendments As shown, none
of the alternatives could simultaneously meet the primary objectives of the applicant, the
City, and OVSD
Environmental Status:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Draft Environmental Impact
Report (DEIR) No 97-1 was prepared by Planning Consultants Research (PCR) a
consultant hired by the City to analyze the potential impacts of the project The document
must be adopted and certified by the City Council prior to any action on General Plan
Amendment No 97-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No 97-1
The DEIR is intended to serve as an informational document for decisions to be made by
the City and responsible agencies regarding the proposed project. The DEIR report covers
both the proposed land use designation amendments as well as the proposed
development of the site (GPA, ZMA, CUP, etc ) DEIR No 97-1 discusses potential
adverse impacts in the areas of Earth Resources, Drainage and Surface Water Quality,
Biological Resources, Land Use, Population and Housing, Transportation/Circulation, Air
Quality, Noise, Public Services, and Utilities, Aesthetics/Light, Energy, Public Health and
Safety, and Recreation The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the proposal are
addressed, as are the impacts of project alternatives
CD98-56 -21- 12/08/98 3 18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
1. Environmental Procedures
The procedure that was followed during preparation of EIR No. 97-1 is outlined below
►ATE ACTIVITY
April-May, Staff conducted an initial study and determined that an EIR would be necessary for the
1997 project
August 15, A Notice of Preparation was filed with the State Clearinghouse to notify public of intent
1997 to prepare an EIR
September 4, Public Scoping Meeting held at Crest View School site for public to submit verbal
1997 statements on issues to be addressed in the EIR
May 5, 1998 Notice of Completion filed with the State Clearinghouse Draft EIR available for public
review and comment for forty-five days (Comment period May 5, 1998 to June 19,
1998) Draft EIR available for review at City Hall, Central Library, and copies were
made available at no cost to the public
May 14, 1998 PCR mailed an Errata Notice depicting the corrected Figure 3 site plan to the City's
Draft EIR distribution list of Responsible and Trustee Agencies and County and Local
Agencies
May 20, 1998 45 day public comment period extended by ten days to cover the time period between
the commencement of the public review (May 5, 1998) and the when the Errata Notice
was distributed (May 14, 1998)
May 21, 1998 PCR sent FedEx transmittal of Notification to Extend Public Review Period to State
Clearinghouse Office of Planning and Research Transmittal included Errata Notice for
distribution to appropriate State agencies by State Clearinghouse
May 21, 1998 PCR sent Notification to Extend Public Review Period as well as a second Errata
Notice to City's Draft EIR Distribution List by Registered Return Receipt
June 8, 1998 Staff holds Public Comment Meeting at Crest View School site to allow interested
parties to submit verbal and written comments on the Draft EIR
June 29, 1998 Written comments on the adequacy of the Draft EIR and the findings and conclusions
reached in the document accepted until 5 00 PM
CD98-56 -22- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
2. Summary of DEIR No 97-1
In the preparation of an environmental impact report, potential impacts associated with the
proposed land use and zoning amendments are identified and analyzed pursuant to the
requirements of CEQA These impacts are categorized into three levels of significance
They are a) Less than significant, b) Impacts that can be mitigated to a level less than
significant, and c) Unavoidable significant impacts The level of impacts associated with
the proposed project are identified below
a) Less Than Significant Impacts
The project will result in impacts to some environmental resources and conditions that are
concluded not to be significant if future development complies with standard conditions of
approval The following topical areas do not represent significant environmental impacts
♦ Earth Resources
♦ Drainage and Surface Water Quality
♦ Biological Resources
♦ Population and Housing
♦ Public Services and Utilities
♦ Energy
♦ Public Health and Safety
b) Adverse Impacts That Can Be Mitigated to Less Than Significant
Through the use of appropriate mitigation measures identified in the DEIR, the majority of
the potentially adverse impacts associated with future development can be mitigated to a
level of insignificance These include impacts to the following
♦ Transportation/Circulation
- Requirement for traffic signal at Talbert Avenue and main project entrance
- Install a protected left-turn signal at Newland Street/Talbert Avenue
intersection
- Pay fair-share contribution toward improvements at Bushard Street/Talbert
Avenue intersection to City of Fountain Valley
- Pay fair-share contribution toward improvements at Beach Boulevard/Slater
Avenue intersection to City of Huntington Beach
♦ Noise
- Limit store deliveries to between 7 00 AM and 10 OOPM
- Noise wall on east and south property line
CD98-56 -23- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
♦ Recreation
- Install public access improvements to Lambert Park
- Reconfigure youth sports improvements at Lake View School
These impacts can be reduced by mitigation measures (Attachment No 15) suggested in
the draft environmental impact report and documented in the CEQA Statement of Findings
and Facts (Attachment No 16)
c) Unavoidable Significant Impacts
There are adverse environmental impacts anticipated from the proposed project that
cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation measures. These include impacts from
the following•
♦ Land Use
- Loss of 9 0 acres of community open space
- Land use compatibility (combination of air quality and aesthetic impacts)
♦ Air Quality
- Carbon monoxide, reactive organic compounds, nitrogen oxides
Prior to certification and adoption of the DEIR by resolution, the City Council may amend
the document It should be noted, however, that removal of any of the recommended
mitigation measures will require findings and justification.
3 Environmental Impacts
a) OPEN SPACE
The change of land use and zoning designation on the site from Public/Semipublic to
General Commercial will result in a city wide and area wide net loss of open space This is
due to the future development of a commercial (big box) retail use on land formerly utilized
as a school site and as a recreation area for the surrounding neighborhood A clear
distinction should be made between loss of open space and loss of recreational space
Loss of open space refers to and analyzes the loss of open field area and the loss of a
visual sense of open character if the site is developed Loss of the use of the site as a
recreational space for the community is discussed below The Draft EIR identifies loss of
open space and visual sense of openness as a significant unavoidable adverse impact that
can not be mitigated The City Council would therefore be required to adopt a Statement
of Overriding Considerations and conclude that benefits of the project outweigh the
unavoidable unmitigated impacts prior to implementation of the proposed change in land
use and zoning designations
CD98-56 -24- 12/08/98 3 18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
b) RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE
Of the 13 89-acre project site, approximately 9 0 acres are grass play fields utilized by
various youth sports organizations These uses are allocated through the City Parks and
Recreation Department, and final agreements (insurance provisions, etc ) are arranged
through OVSD In 1997, the following youth organizations had agreement with the school
district to use the fields
• Fountain Valley Youth Baseball — February through June, Monday through Friday,
4 00 p m to dusk, and Saturdays 8 00 a m to dusk
• American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO) 55 — March through June, Monday
through Friday, between 4-00 p.m. and 6 00 p m.
In addition, the approximately 9 0 acres of grass play fields on the project site are
considered to be open space that can be used for non-organized recreational activities or
serve as open space for the surrounding neighborhood
Since the early 1950s, the City and school district developed recreational open space
based on the City's quarter-section neighborhoods The Draft Youth Sports Needs
Assessment Study (DYSNAS), a document under review by the City, evaluates recreation
and park needs based on this quarter-section concept and divides the City into 30 map
areas for analysis. Although the DYSNAS has not been adopted by the City, it serves as
an important tool for evaluation and quantification of the recreational facilities available in
the community. The proposed project site is located within Map Area 19 of the DYSNAS,
bounded by Talbert Avenue on the north, Garfield Avenue on the south, and Beach
Boulevard and Newland Street to the west and east, respectively
In 1996, Area 19 was estimated to have a population of 5,093 Based on this population
and the park land standard of 5 0 acres per 1,000 people (City's General Plan Policy RCS
2 1 1), the amount of required park land for Area 19 is estimated to be 25 5 acres There
are 7 5 acres of existing parkland (not including Crest View) in Area 19 Thus, there is a
shortage of 18 0 acres of parks within Area 19 (25 5 — 7 5 = 18)
The exisiting open field area at Crest View is 9 0 acres Even if the recreational open
space area of the Crest View School site is included (7 5 + 9 0 = 16 5), Area 19 has an
existing shortage of 9 0 acres of park and recreation open space (25 5 — 16.5 = 9 0). The
table below summarizes existing park and recreational open space resources within Area
19 compared to the open space required on a quarter-section/population basis
CD98-56 -25- 12/08/98 3.18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
Open Space and Recreation Facilities
Map Area 19
Site Acres Facilities Sports
Leagues
Lambert Park 55 No facilities No Leagues
Helme Park 20 Children's Play Area No Leagues
Picnic Facility
Basketball
Total Existing Open 7.5
Space Area 19(Without
Crest View)
Crest View School 90 Softball/Little League(2) FVYB
Basketball (6) AYSO
Volleyball (2)
Total Existing Open 16.5
Space Area 19(With
Crest View)
Required Open Space 25.5
Area 19
Source Youth Sports Needs Assessment Study, October 1997
Lambert Park is a neighborhood park and consists of an open grass play area surrounded
by a private residential development The only public access to this park is via a steep,
unimproved slope off of Newland Street Vehicular access to the park is possible,
however, the access requires the public to enter a private community through private
streets with no public parking provided Public parking for this neighborhood park is along
Newland Street The difficult access to this park and conflict with public use of the private
residential roadway has been a long-standing issue with this community
CD98-56 -26- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
In 1996, the City of Huntington Beach was estimated to have a population of 190,763.
Based on this population and the parkland standard of 5 0 acres per 1,000 people (City's
General Plan Policy RCS 2.1.1), the amount of required parkland on a citywide basis is
estimated to be 953 81 acres The current total developed and undeveloped parkland
acreage within the city is 1,186 6 acres, including beaches and municipal golf courses.
City-wide, therefore, the required parkland standard is exceeded by approximately 233
acres. Although these calculations represent the city's requirements in general terms, they
do not reflect the complexity of the city or the diversification of current park land and open
space as it relates to community or youth sports needs
Without mitigation, the proposed land use and zoning designation of commercial will result
in the loss of recreational open space and fields that are currently used by youth sports
teams This loss of organized recreational opportunities is considered a significant project
impact Without mitigation, the proposed project will also result in the loss of approximately
9 0 acres of open space/parkland available for recreational use Since the community is
already deficient in open space/parkland based on the City's standard, this is also
considered a significant project impact The loss of organized recreational opportunities
also constitutes a cumulatively significant impact for the City The loss of open
space/parkland, however, does not represent a cumulatively significant impact, since
Citywide, the City meets standards set forth for the provision of open space
The following measures are recommended to mitigate the loss of open space/parkland
associated with the proposed project-
Prior to the issuance of building permits
R-1 Construction of access to Lambert Park from Newland Street shall be required A
switchback ramp is anticipated to be required and shall be provided pursuant to the
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act
The Lambert Park site was developed as a park, in part, to preserve a known significant
cultural resource The site has been the subject of several archaeological investigations
and is protected by City policies Although, based on the previous investigations, it is not
believed that there are archaeological resources within the area, which would be impacted
by construction of improved access to the park, the following mitigation is recommended to
assure that existing resources are not impacted
CD98-56 -27- 12/08/98 3.18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
R-2 A Phase I archaeological study, including a literature search, records search, field
visit, and report outlining constraints or lack of constraints, shall be completed prior to
construction of the access improvements In the event that constraints are identified, an
archaeological monitor shall be present during the construction of access improvements
The archaeologist shall have the authority to stop construction activities in the event
archaeological resources are uncovered during grading until inspection, evaluation, and
recovery activities are completed
The following mitigation measure is recommended to mitigate the loss of organized
recreation opportunities (on-going scheduled use of the site by Youth Sports Teams
including Fountain Valley Youth Baseball and Amencan Youth Soccer Organization) at the
project site. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the proposed Crest View project
R-3 The City shall develop a phased, long-term agreement with OVSD to mitigate the
loss of recreational facilities at both the Crest View School site and the Rancho View
School site, which is also anticipated to be developed with commercial uses The
agreement is anticipated to incorporate the following
Phase 1 — Upon development of the Crest View School site, facilities at Lake View School
should be improved to accommodate the youth soccer and youth softball activities
previously accommodated at Crest View This will require the relocation of two softball
backstops and the installation of one soccer field at Lake View
Phase 2 - Upon development of the Rancho View School site, the Lake View School site
facilities should be reconfigured to accommodate two skinned infield baseball diamonds
(for the OV Little League) The softball and soccer field at Lake View School will then need
to be relocated to the Park View School/Murdy Park site.
With the above noted mitigation measures the proposed project does not result in a
significant impact to recreation and therefore, recreational open space can be mitigated
CD98-56 -28- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
c) AIR QUALITY
The proposed project will result in long-term air emissions, primarily related to vehicle trips
generated by future development, which are significant and unavoidable. Although
implementation of Standard City Policies and Requirements such as compliance with the
Transportation Demand Management Ordinance will reduce this impact, emissions will still
exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) significance thresholds
for carbon monoxide, reactive organic compounds, and nitrogen oxides Cumulative air
quality impacts to the region will also be significant based on SCAQMD's method to
analyze these impacts Therefore, it is concluded that amendment to the land use
designations and potential development of 175,000 square feet of commercial uses will
have a cumulatively significant impact upon air quality
Even with the implementation of available measures to reduce long-term vehicle
emissions, operations associated with up to 175,000 square feet will result in emissions
that exceed the SCAQMD daily threshold emission levels for carbon monoxide, reactive
organic compounds, and nitrogen oxides The project, therefore, will result in significant,
unavoidable operational and cumulative air quality impacts.
Additional impacts associated with the development project (CUP, etc ) have been
identified as part of the DEIR The impacts and associated mitigation measures are not
discussed at this time since the actual development proposal was not acted on by the
Planning Commission and, therefore, not forwarded for the Council's consideration.
Summary:
Staff recommends the City Council overturn the Planning Commission's denial of EIR No
97-1/GPA No. 97-1/ZMA No 97-1 and approve the applicant's request to amend the
general plan and zoning designations because the proposed commercial land use and
zoning designation is consistent with the land use goals to improve the City's fiscal viability,
achieve the development of a range of commercial uses, and to provide jobs and
commercial services in proximity to residents. The project will also be adequately served
by transportation and utility infrastructure, public services, and can be compatible with the
surrounding land uses The zoning map amendment will carry out policies and objectives
stated in the Economic Development Element of the General Plan and meet City Council
objectives to promote economic development as stated in City Council Resolution No 96-
57 The Zoning Map Amendment will promote the development of commercial "Big Box"
buildings and ancillary uses enhancing the City's market potential in terms of retail activity
It will create a cumulative economic growth that provides a balance throughout the City
CD98-56 -29- 12/08/98 3.18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
Additionally, it will create opportunities that will expand the range of goods and services
provided in Huntington Beach to accommodate the needs of all residents in Huntington
Beach and the market area The subject site is suitable for "big box" commercial uses
because of its size and that it abuts an arterial highway Commercial development of the
site is anticipated to improve fiscal stability and provide economic opportunities for the City,
and is therefore consistent with the goals included in the Economic Element The
proposed project is consistent with the goals of the Circulation Element The project will
not result in decreasing area intersections to less than acceptable standards and will
provide off-site parking in excess of minimum requirements. It is consistent with the goal to
provide a balanced transportation system, since it will provide economic development
opportunities, provide mitigation for environmental impacts to surrounding residential
areas, and any future development would comply with the City's Transportation Demand
Management Ordinance.
Staff recommends the City Council overturn the Planning Commission's denial of EIR No
97-1/GPA No 97-1/ZMA No 97-1 and approve the applicant's request to amend the
general plan and zoning designations for the following reasons (Attachment No 4)
♦ The 13 89 acre site is suitable for commercial (big box) retail development because of
its size, location along Talbert Avenue, and its close proximity to Beach Boulevard.
♦ The proposed commercial general plan and zoning designation to allow commercial
(big box) retail development is compatible and can be sensitively integrated with the
surrounding land uses with adequate buffers, site layout recommendations, FAR limits,
and urban design amenities
♦ The proposed commercial general plan and zoning designation will increase the
potential for taxable sales and provide additional funds to the city to offset service
costs.
♦ The proposed commercial general plan and zoning designation is consistent with goals
and policies of the general plan land use element, economic development element, and
circulation element
♦ The proposed commercial general plan and zoning designation allows for commercial
development that can mitigate potential impacts to the surrounding area to the greatest
extent possible, while still allowing for a market driven commercial project
CD98-56 -30- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
Attachment(s):
NumberCity Clerk's
Page . Description
1 Planning Commission Notice of Action — Findings for Denial
2 Draft Resolution No (Final EIR No 97-1) with Statement of
Overriding Considerations
3 Draft Resolution No (GPA No 97-1) with Exhibits
4 Findings for Approval —Zoning Map Amendment No 97-1
5 Draft Ordinance No (ZMA No 97-1) with Exhibits
6 Current and Proposed General Plan and Zoning Designation Maps
7 Appeal Letter Received from Greg McClelland, Arnel Retail Group on
November 5, 1998
8 City Council Resolution No 96-57
9 Fiscal Report by Stanley Hoffman and Associates dated April 10, 1998
10 Economic Development Section of Planning Commission staff report
from August 11, 1998
11 Power Point presentation from Planning Commission meeting of
September 11, 1998
12 Memorandum dated August 17, 1998, from Economic Development
Director
13 Memorandum dated September 3, 1998, from Economic Development
Director
14 Memorandum dated October 6, 1998 from Economic Development
Director
15 Mitigation Measures identified in EIR No 97-1
16 CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts
17 Compendium compiled by OVSD dated August 14, 1998
18 Letters in Opposition to the Project Received Since the October 27,
1998 Planning Commission Meeting
19 Letters in Support of the Project Received Since the October 27, 1998
Planning Commission Meeting
20 August 11, 1998 Planning Commission Staff Report
CD98-56 -31- 12/08/98 3:18 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-56
City Clerk's
Page Number No. Description
21 September 9, 1998 Planning Commission Staff Report
22 October 13, 1998 Planning Commission Study Session Staff Report
23 October 27, 1998 Planning Commission Staff Report
24 Final EIR No 97-1 includes Response to Comments
25 Draft EIR No 97-1 and Technical Appendices (under separate
cover—not attachedl
HZ HF JM kjl
CD98-56 -32- 12/08/98 5:01 PM
(113) Aau�
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
January 13, 1999
Mr. Greg McClelland
Arnel Retail Group
949 South Coast Drive, Suite 600
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach held a public hearing on December 14,
1998 to consider Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1, General Plan Amendment No.
97-1 and your appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Zoning Map Amendment
No. 97-1.
The City Council overturned the Planning Commission's denial and certified
Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 as adequate and complete in accordance with
CEQA requirements with a Statement of Overriding Considerations by adopting
Resolution No. 98-94 as amended to state floor area for taxable sales to be 10-20%.
The City Council overturned the Planning Commission's denial and approved General
Plan Amendment No. 97-1 by adopting Resolution No. 98-95.
The City Council overturned the Planning Commission's denial and approved Appeal of
Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1, with findings, by approving introduction of Ordinance
No 3408.
If you have further questions regarding this matter please call the Planning Department,
Jane Madera (714) 536-5596.
�� 9%A-�
Connie Brockway, CIVIC
City Clerk
Cc: Jane Madera, Associate Planner
(Telephone:714-536-5227)
ATTACHMENT 1
Y
J�
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
October 29, 1998
Mr. Greg McClelland
Arnel Retail Group
949 South Coast Drive, Suite 600
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO.97-1/GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 97-1/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 97-1 (Crest
View School Site/Wal-Mart)
REQUEST: To permit a general plan amendment and zoning map amendment to modify the
existing land use and zoning designations. The General Plan Land Use Map is
proposed to be amended from Public (underlying Low Density Residential)to
General Commercial with a maximum Floor Area Ratio of.35 (CG-F1). The
Zoning Map Amendment is proposed to be amended from Public-Semipublic
(PS) to General Commercial (CG). The request also includes certification of
Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 which analyzes the proposed
amendments.
LOCATION: 18052 Lisa Lane (Closed Crest View School/South of Talbert Avenue,
approximately 300 feet east of Beach Boulevard)
DATE OF
ACTION: October 27, 1998
Your application was acted upon by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach
on October 27, 1998. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that your
request be Denied. The Planning Commission automatically forwards their recommendation for
denial of Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 and General Plan Amendment No. 97-1 to the
City Council for final action. However, pursuant to Section 247.12 of the Huntington Beach
Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, the Planning Commission's denial of Zoning Map
Amendment No. 97-1 terminates the zoning map amendment application, unless the denial is
appealed to the City Council by you or an interested party. Attached to this letter are the
Findings for Denial for this application.
(98CL 1027-2)
i
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance,the action
taken by the Planning Commission on Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1 becomes final at the
expiration of the appeal period. A person desiring to appeal the decision shall file a written
notice of appeal to the City Clerk within ten calendar days of the date of the Planning
Commission's action. The notice of appeal shall include the name and address of the appellant,
the decision being appealed, and the grounds for the appeal; it shall also be accompanied by a
filing fee. The appeal fee is $1,490.00.
In your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing fee is November 6, 1998.
If there are any further questions,please contact Jane Madera, Associate Planner at
(714) 536-5271.
Sincerely,
Howard Zelefsky, Secretary
Planning Commission
by:
erb Fauland
Senior Planner
xc: Dr. James Tarwater, Superintendent, Ocean View School District, 17200 Pinehurst Lane,
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
(98CL 1027-3)
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 97-1/
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-1/
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 97-1
1. The certification of Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 and the granting of General Plan
Amendment No. 97-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1 to amend the General Plan
Land Use designation from P(RL-7) to CG-F1 and the amend the zoning from PS to CG at
the Crest View School site will adversely affect the General Plan. The request is inconsistent
with the existing Land Use Element designation of P(RL-7), Public with underlying Low
Density Residential, on the subject property because it is inconsistent with the following
policy of the General Plan:
a. L U 13.1.6 "Encourage surplus schools and other public properties to be made
available first for other public purposes, such as parks,..."
2. Certification of Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 and adoption of General Plan
Amendment No. 97-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1 is not in conformance with
public convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice because:
a. The Huntington Beach Youth Sports Needs Assessment, dated October 1997, clearly
shows the area bounded by Beach Boulevard,Newland Street, Talbert Avenue and
Garfield Avenue is short 18 acres of park area. The complete loss of 9.0 acres of existing
open space that can be converted to park uses does not meet the City's policies and goals
for parks and open space. `
b. Providing access to 5.5 acre Lambert Park from Newland Street is not adequate
mitigation for loss of open space. The park topography, surrounded by a private gated
community does not meet the needs of an open, accessible,neighborhood park.
(98CL 1027-4)
J�
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
October 29, 1998
Mr. Greg McClelland
Arnel Retail Group
949 South Coast Drive, Suite 600
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-70NARIANCE NO. 98-18/SIGN
CODE EXCEPTION NO. 98-7/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 97-161
(Crest View School Site/Wal-Mart))
REQUEST: To permit the construction of a 134,740 square foot Wal*Mart store with a 9,431
square foot garden center as well as three other retail/restaurant pads ranging in
size from 3,500 square feet to 5,500 square feet. Other entitlements requested
include a tentative parcel map and a variance to allow the minimum 100 foot deep
main driveway entrance with a side driveway opening. The main driveway
design standard does not permit openings along the entire 100 foot length of the
main entrance. Also requested is a sign code exception to allow a freestanding
sign on an adjacent parcel as well as signs that exceed maximum height, sign area,
and are located closer together than allowed by code. The project also includes a
request to allow perimeter noise walls up to 15 feet in height instead of the
maximum 8 foot high wall allowed between residential and commercial
properties.
LOCATION: 18052 Lisa Lane (Closed Crest View School/South of Talbert Avenue,
approximately 300 feet east of Beach Boulevard)
DATE OF
ACTION: October 27, 1998
Your application was not acted upon by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington
Beach on October 27, 1998, due to the denial of Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1, General
Plan Amendment No. 97-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1.
(98CL 1027-5)
If there are any further questions,please contact Jane Madera, Associate Planner at
(714) 536-5271.
Sincerely,
Howard Zelefsky, Secretary
Planning Commission
by:
erb Fauland
Senior Planner
xc: Dr. James Tarwater, Superintendent, Ocean View School District, 17200 Pinehurst Lane,
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
(98CL 1027-6)
A- .,T-TACHMETN 2
RESOLUTION NO. 98-94
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 97-1
FOR THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND
FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (UP TO A
MAXIMUM OF 175,000 SQUARE FEET)
ON THE CREST VIEW SCHOOL SITE
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TALBERT AVENUE
APPROX. 300 FEET EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD.
WHEREAS, an application was submitted requesting a General Plan Amendment AND
Zoning Map Amendment for the proposed land use changes and future commercial development;
and
Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 ("EIR 97-1") has been prepared to address the
environmental effects, mitigation measures, and project alternatives associated with the proposed
land use amendment, zoning amendment, and potential future development; and
The Draft EIR was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
("CEQA"), the State CEQA Guidelines (the "Guidelines"), and the City's environmental
procedures; and
Written and oral comments on EIR 97-1 were received from the public and responsible
public agencies during and after the review period, and
The City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission conducted public hearings to
receive public testimony with respect to the Draft EIR; and
Such comments and testimony were responded to through a Response to Comments
document and said document was made available in a manner prescribed by CEQA and the
Guidelines; and
Public Resources Code 21092.5(a) requires that the City of Huntington Beach provide a
written proposed response to any public agency that commented on the EIR, and the Response to
Comments included in the Final EIR satisfies this provision; and
The Planning Commission reviewed all environmental documentation comprising the
EIR, including all elements of the Final EIR, however recommended denial by the City Council;
and
1
4/s PCD Resolut Wal-Mart
RLS 98-454
12/1/98
Res. No. 98-94
Section 15092 of CEQA Guidelines provides that the City shall not decide to approve or
carry out a project for which an EIR was prepared unless it has (a) eliminated or substantially
lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible as shown in the findings under
Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines, and (b) determined that any remaining significant effects
on the environment found to be unavoidable under Section 15091 are acceptable due to
overriding concerns as described in Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines, and
Section 15093(a) of the Guidelines requires the City to balance the benefits of a proposed
project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the
prof ect;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby
resolve as follows:
1. That the City Council hereby finds and certifies the Final EIR as complete and
adequate in that it addresses all environmental effects of the proposed land use and zoning map
amendments to General Commercial and up to a maximum of 175,000 square feet of commercial
development, and fully complies with the requirements of CEQA and the Guidelines The Final
EIR will be composed of the following elements-
a. Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
b. Planning Commission and City Council staff reports
C. Planning Commission and City Council Minutes
d. Comments received on Draft EIR and responses to those comments
All of the above information has been and will be on file with the City of Huntington
Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, 92648 and with
the Secretary of the Commission.
2. That the Final EIR has identified all significant environmental effects of the
project and that there are no known potential environmental impacts not addressed in the Final
EIR
3 That the City Council finds that the Final EIR has described all reasonable
alternatives to the project that could feasibly obtain the basic objectives of the project (including
the "no project"alternative), even when these alternatives might impede the attainment of project
objectives and might be more costly. Further, the City Council finds that a good faith effort was
made to incorporate alternatives in the preparation of the Draft EIR and all reasonable
alternatives were considered in the review process of the Final EIR and ultimate decisions on the
project.
4 That the City Council further finds that the benefits gained by the City and its
current and future residents by virtue of implementing the goals and policies of the proposed
General Plan, override the unmitigable effects detailed in Environmental Impact Report 97-1,
2
4's PCD Resolut Wal-Mart
RLS 98-454
12/1/98
Res. No. 98-94
and the Statement of Ovemding Considerations is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated
by this reference as though fully set forth herein
5. That the City Council hereby adopts Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at an adjourned
regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of December , 1998
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
rty Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED INITIA ED AND APPROVED:
City Ad mistrator Dir or of P16xwng
ATTACHMENT
Exhibit A• Statement of Overriding Considerations
3
4/s PCD Resolut Wal-Mart
RLS 98-454
12/1/98
RESOLUTION NO. 98-94
EXHIBIT A
CREST VIEW SCHOOL/WAL-MART
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a public agency to balance the
benefits of a proposed project against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts
in determining whether to approve the project. The project will result in environmental effects of
Air Quality and Land Use, which, although mitigated to the extent feasible by the
implementation of mitigation measures, will remain significant unavoidable adverse impacts as
discussed in the Environmental Impact Report and Findings The City of Huntington Beach has
determined that the significant unavoidable adverse impact of this project are acceptable when
balanced against the benefits of this project. In making this determination, the factors and public
benefits provided below were considered.
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial for up to a
maximum of 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development, are consistent
with and implement City of Huntington Beach Resolution No. 96-57, adopted by the City
Council on July 1, 1996. This resolution encourages consideration of applications for
commercial development on large parcels of land adjacent to mayor arterial highways or
other vacant or underutilized parcels in the City, including vacant/surplus school sites, or any
other vacant or underutilized sites or parcels in the City of Huntington Beach
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial will increase
employment opportunities in the City of Huntington Beach including short-term construction
employment and long-term employment opportunities associated with potential future
construction of up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial and a potential
for up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development will generate lease
revenue for the Ocean View School District, which will utilize the funds for facilities and
programs within the Ocean View School District.
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial and a potential
for up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development will contribute
toward revitalization of marginal commercial uses in the area and will serve as a catalyst to
stimulate other business opportunities and widen the employee base of the community.
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial and a potential
for up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development will have a positive
fiscal effect on the City of Huntington Beach It will generate substantial additional revenues
(assuming a future project condition of approval limiting a minimum of 10% to a maximum
of 20% of"big box" floor area devoted to display of non-taxable sales items) to the City of
Huntington Beach
(g madera/crestvie/override)
Res. No. 98-94
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of
the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City,
do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at an adjourned regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of December, 1998
by the following vote:
AYES: Julien, Dettloff, Bauer, Garofalo
NOES: Harman, Green, Sullivan
ABSENT: None
i Clerk and ex-officio CArk of the
City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach, California
ATTACHMENT 3 1
RESOLUTION NO. 98-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-1
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 97-1 concerns the 13.89 gross acre area
generally located on the south side of Talbert Avenue approximately 300 feet east of Beach
Boulevard(hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property"), more particularly described in the
legal description and sketch attached hereto as Exhibits A-1 and A-2, respectively, which
Exhibits are incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, and
General Plan Amendment No. 97-1 proposes to amend the Land Use Element of the
General Plan,to change the general plan designation for the Subject Property from P (RL)
(Public with an underlying designation of Low Density Residential)to CG-F1 (General
Commercial with a Floor Area Ratio of.35); and
Pursuant to the California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of
Huntington Beach, after notice duly given,held a public hearing on August 11, 1998, and
October 27, 1998, to consider General Plan Amendment 97-1, and recommended denial to the
City Council; and
Pursuant to the California Government Code, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach, after notice duly given,held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment 97-1,
and
The City Council finds that General Plan Amendment No. 97-1 is necessary for the
changing needs and orderly development of the community, and are necessary to accomplish the
goals and objectives of the General Plan and are consistent with the other elements of the
General Plan,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby
resolve as follows:
1. That the City Council desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping
with changing community needs and objectives
2. That General Plan Amendment No. 97-1 is necessary to accomplish refinement of
the General Plan and is consistent with the other elements of the General Plan
1
4/s PCD Resolut GPam97-1
RLS 98-454
7/24/98
Res. No. 98-95
3. That the City Council finds that through the implementation of the mitigation
measures addressed in Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1, some of the potentially adverse
impacts associated with the proposed project can be eliminated or reduced to a level of
insignificance and has made appropriate findings as found in the Statement of Overriding
Considerations, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B"and incorporated by this
reference as though fully set forth herein
4 That the City Council further finds that the benefits accruing to the City by virtue
of implementing the General Plan, override the unmitigable effects outlined in Environmental
Impact Report No 97-1, as detailed in the Statement of Overriding Considerations (see Exhibit
«B„)
5 That said General Plan Amendment No 97-1 is hereby approved and adopted
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at an adjourned
regular meeting held on the 14th day of December , 1998
Mayor
ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM:
i er C'ty ttorney
&2- -Ie-S y
REVIEWED AND APPROVED INITIATED AND APPR VED:
City Ad&inistrator 4relior of Pl ing
Attachments
Exhibit A-1: Legal Description of Subject Property
Exhibit A-2- Sketch of Subject Property
Exhibit B Statement of Overriding Considerations
2
4/s PCD Resolut GPam97-1
RLS 98-454
7/24/98
RESOLUTION NO. 98-95
V% •' -
Ads Pwo OR-963239
Lwauns Commie
TITLE OFFICER-OWE:
ALL '!TEAT CERTAIN LAND SITUATHD IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF ORANGE, CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 1:
THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION THIRTY-SIX,TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE ELEVEN WEST, IN
THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 13 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ONE-HALF OF ALL OIL. PETROLEUM,NATURAL GAS,MINERAL RIGHTS
AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES IN,ON OR UNDER THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY,
BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF ENTRY ABOVE A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID
LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING FOR, EXTRACTING, MINING, BORING, REMOVING OR
MARKETING SAID SUBSTANCES AS RESERVED IN DEED FROM SARAH G. GROVES, A WIDOW,TO
BEN G. GAUTIER AND WIFE RECORDED DECEMBER 1. 1954 IN BOOK 2882, PAGE 346 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ONE-HALF OF ALL OIL, PETROLEUM. NATURAL GAS, MINERAL
RIGHTS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES IN. ON OR UNDER THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
PROPERTY, BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF ENTRY ABOVE A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE
SURFACE OF SAID LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING FOR,EXTRACTING, MINING,BORING,
REMOVING OR MARKETING SAID SUBSTANCES. AS RESERVED BY BEN G. GAUTIER AND WIFE BY
DEED RECORDED JANUARY 20, 1960.
PARCEL 2:
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION THIRTY-SIX, TOWNSHIP FIVE SOUTH, RANGE ELEVEN WEST, IN THE RANCHO LAS
BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 13 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL OIL, PETROLEUM, NATURAL.GAS, MINERAL RIGHTS AND OTHER
HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES IN, ON OR UNDER THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, BUT
WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF ENTRY ABOVE A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND
FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING FOR, EXTRACTING, MINING, BORING, REMOVING OR
MARKETING SAID SUBSTANCES, AS RESERVED BY DONALD M. SMITH AND OTHERS BY DEED
RECORDED JANUARY 20, 1960.
AW.N.W.114,N.W114,SEC, 36,T,5S R.11W. :�:•'"�' ;:.fi .;a .� !� ;
167-60 t
n + TALBERT ;,
J� x AVENUE ••t'
1.
ti � PM t k nue r �
0 ;lod
m
�'•u SUBJECT SITE �T'I
K
tl
arJr nrw eYircMrier scNact OD
ONO•
_ O
PM/
00
e 0 I 1
Q
w
(D '
_ 49
�M
rM M MARCH /981? PARCEL MAP PIA 56.33,91-/3 NOTE•ASSESSOR'S BLOCK t ASSESSOR'S MAP
PARCEL NUMBERS SOOK157 PAGE40 CD
SHOWN LN CIRCLES COtWV Of ORANGE
1 �• - —
First American TYtle Insurance Company
N THIS WW fe POR VIFORMATION ONLY AND K NOT A PART OF THIS TT U BMDUCK
1 �
RESOLUTION NO. 98-95
EXHIBIT B
CREST VIEW SCHOOL/WAL-MART
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a public agency to balance the
benefits of a proposed project against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts
in determining whether to approve the project The project will result in environmental effects of
Air Quality and Land Use, which, although mitigated to the extent feasible by the
implementation of mitigation measures, will remain significant unavoidable adverse impacts as
discussed in the Environmental Impact Report and Findings. The City of Huntington Beach has
determined that the significant unavoidable adverse impact of this project are acceptable when
balanced against the benefits of this project In making this determination,the factors and public
benefits provided below were considered.
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial for up to a
maximum of 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development. are consistent
with and implement City of Huntington Beach Resolution No. 96-57, adopted by the City
Council on July 1, 1996. This resolution encourages consideration of applications for
commercial development on large parcels of land adjacent to major arterial highways or
other vacant or underutilized parcels in the City, including vacant/surplus school sites, or any
other vacant or underutilized sites or parcels in the City of Huntington Beach.
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial will increase
employment opportunities in the City of Huntington Beach including short-term construction
employment and long-term employment opportunities associated with potential future
construction of up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial and a potential
for up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development will generate lease
revenue for the Ocean View School District, which will utilize the funds for facilities and
programs within the Ocean View School District.
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial and a potential
for up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development will contribute
toward revitalization of marginal commercial uses in the area and will serve as a catalyst to
stimulate other business opportunities and widen the employee base of the community.
♦ The proposed land use and zoning map amendments to General Commercial and a potential
for up to 175,000 square feet of general retail commercial development will have a positive
fiscal effect on the City of Huntington Beach. It will generate substantial additional revenues
(assuming a future project condition of approval limiting a minimum of 10% to a maximum
of 20% of"big box" floor area devoted to display of non-taxable sales items) to the City of
Huntington Beach.
(g madera/crestvie/ovemde)
Res.No. 98-95
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, CONNIE BROCKWAY,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of
the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City,
do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach is seven;that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at an adjourned regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of December, 1998
by the following vote:
AYES: Julien,Dettloff,Bauer, Garofalo
NOES: Harman, Green, Sullivan
ABSENT: None
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach, California
ATTACHMENT 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
FINDINGS OF APPROVAL
FOR
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO 97-1:
1. Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1 to change the zoning on a 13.89 acre parcel from Public-
Semipublic to General Commercial is consistent with the objectives,policies, general land uses and
programs specified in the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. It will be consistent with the
proposed General Plan Land Use designation of General Commercial for the property. The zoning
map amendment will carry out policies and objectives stated in the Economic Development Element
of the General Plan and meet City Council objectives to promote economic development as stated in
City Council Resolution No. 96-57. Such goals, objectives and policies include:
A. Land Use Element
Goal L U I Achieve development that maintains or improves the City's fiscal viability and reflects
economic demands while maintaining and improving the quality of life for the current and future
residents of Huntington Beach.
Goal LU 10 Achieve the development of a range of commercial uses.
Policy LU 13 1 6 Encourage surplus schools and other public properties to be made available first for
other public purposes, such as parks, open space, adult or child care, and secondarily for reuse for
private purposes and/or other land uses and development.
Policy LU 131 7 The type intensity and density for reuse and/or development of surplus school sites
shall be determined by the following:
a. compatibility with the type and character of adjacent uses;
b. integration with adjacent commercial uses through the use of such amenities as common
automobile access and reciprocal access agreements, consistent architectural treatment and
pedestrian connections,
c the land use designations and policies for surrounding properties as defined by this plan;
d. formulation and approval of an appropriate site plan;
e working with residents of surrounding neighborhoods in the formulation of a reuse plan; and
f. the utilization of appropriate design features, such as, but not limited to:
• the maintenance of active, usable open space for use by the surrounding neighborhood;
(98SR51C)—8/11/98 Attachment No 4 1
• the provision of buffering, such as open space areas or landscaping between new development
and existing development; and
• compliance with the applicable Design and Development Standards specified in the General
Plan.
The proposed project is consistent with the land use goals to improve the City's fiscal viability,
achieve the development of a range of commercial uses, and to provide jobs and commercial
services in proximity to residents. The project will also be adequately served by transportation and
utility infrastructure and public services.
B. Economic Development Element
Goal ED 1 Provide economic opportunities for present and future Huntington Beach residents and
businesses through employment and local fiscal stability.
Objective ED 1 1: Enhance the City's market potential in terms of retail, office,industrial, and visitor
serving activity. This would allow Huntington Beach to provide for retail, office, and industrial
opportunities that serve the current and projected population and enhance sales and occupancy tax
revenue.
Objective ED 12 Seek to create a cumulative economic growth the provides a balance throughout
the City.
Policy ED 2 41 Encourage and assist existing and potential commercial owners to modernize and
expand their commercial properties
Policy ED 2 4 2 Seek to capture the"new growth"businesses such as,but not limited to:
• "shop for value" or"big box" stores
Policy ED 2 4 3 Encourage the expansion of the range of goods and services provided in Huntington
Beach to accommodate the needs of all residents in Huntington Beach and the market area.
Commercial development of the site is anticipated to improve fiscal stability and provide economic
opportunities for the City, and is therefore with the goals included in this element.
C Circulation Element
Goal CE 2 Provide a circulation system which supports existing,approved and planned land uses
throughout the city while maintaining a desired level of service on all streets and at all intersections.
The proposed project is consistent with the goals of the Circulation Element. The project will not
result in decreasing area intersections to less than acceptable standards and will provide off-site
parking in excess of minimum requirements. It is consistent with the goal to provide a balanced
transportation system, since it will provide economic development opportunities, provide mitigation
(98SR5IQ—8/11/98 Attachment No 4 2
for environmental impacts to surrounding residential areas, and comply with the City's
Transportation Demand Management Ordinance.
2. In the case of a general land use provision,the zoning map amendment is compatible with the uses
authorized in, and the standards prescribed for,the zoning district for which it is proposed. The
Zoning Map Amendment is a change to the zoning designation on the subject property from Public-
Semipublic to General Commercial and does not involve any text changes to the HBZSO.
3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. The Zoning Map Amendment will
promote the development of commercial"Big Box"buildings and ancillary uses enhancing the City's
market potential in terms of retail activity. It will create a cumulative economic growth that provides
a balance throughout the City. Additionally, it will create opportunities that will expand the range of
goods and services provided in Huntington Beach to accommodate the needs of all residents in
Huntington Beach and the market area.
4. Its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice.
The Zoning Map Amendment will provide additional commercial opportunities for Huntington Beach
residents in accord with the goals and policies of the City. The subject site is suitable for"big box"
commercial uses because of its size and that it abuts an arterial highway
(98SR51C)—8/11/98 Attachment No 4 3
ATTACHMENT 5
ORDINANCE NO. 3408
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION CODE
BY AMENDING DISTRICT MAP 40 (SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 36-5-11)
TO REZONE THE REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TALBERT AVENUE
APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD
FROM PS (PUBLIC-SEMI PUBLIC)
TO CG(GENERAL COMMERCIAL-FLOODPLAIlN)
(ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 97-1)
WHEREAS,pursuant to the California State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington
Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate, duly
noticed public hearings to consider Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-1,which rezones the
property generally located on the south side of Talbert Avenue approximately 300 feet east of
Beach Boulevard from PS- (Public-Semi Public-)to CG(General Commercial); and
After due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning
Commission and all other evidence presented, the City Council finds that the aforesaid
amendment is proper and consistent with the General Plan,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. That the real property that is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter
referred to as the "Subject Property") is generally located on the south side of Talbert Avenue
approximately 300 feet east of Beach Boulevard, and is more particularly described in the legal
descriptions and sketch attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively, and incorporated by
reference as though fully set forth herein.
1
4/s:PCD:Ordinance:Amd97-1
RLS 98-454
12/1/98
SECTION 2. That the zoning designation of the Subject Property is hereby changed
from PS (Public-Semi Public) to CG(General Commercial).
SECTION 3. That Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Code Section 201.04B
District Map 40 (Sectional District Map 36-5-11) is hereby amended to reflect Zoning Map
Amendment No. 97-1 as described herein. The Director of Planning is hereby directed to prepare
and file an amended map. A copy of said District Map, as amended, shall be available for
inspection in the Office of the City Clerk.
SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of 1998.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attom�
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
City Ad 6strator DUctor of Pladnitig
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Legal Description
Exhibit B: Sketch
2
4/s:PCD:Ordinance:Amd97-1
RLS 98-454
12/1/98
EXHIBIT A
=Alu g
Lusuase c OR-96323!
Ls Comasicnnu
TITLE OFFICER-OWE
ALL THAT CERTAIN LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF ORANGE, CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH,.DESCRIBED AS FOLL6WS:
PARCEL I:
THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION THIRTY-SIX, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE ELEVEN WEST, IN
THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 13 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ONE-HALF OF ALL OIL, PETROLEUM,NATURAL GAS,MINERAL RIGHTS
AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES IN,ON OR UNDER THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY,
BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF ENTRY ABOVE A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID
LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING FOR, EXTRACTING, MINING, BORING, REMOVING OR
MARKETING SAID SUBSTANCES AS RESERVED IN DEED FROM SARAH G. GROVES. A WIDOW, TO
BEN G. GAUTIER AND WIFE RECORDED DECEMBER 1. 1954 IN BOOK 2882, PAGE 346 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ONE-HALF OF ALL OIL, PETROLEUM, NATURAL GAS, MINERAL
RIGHTS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES IN. ON OR CINDER THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
PROPERTY, BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF ENTRY ABOVE A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE
SURFACE OF SAID LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING FOR,EXTRACTING, MINING,BORING,
REMOVING OR MARKETING SAID SUBSTANCES, AS RESERVED BY BEN G. GAUTIER AND WIFE BY
DEED RECORDED JANUARY 20, 1960.
PARCEL 2:
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION THIRTY-SIX, TOWNSHIP FIVE SOUTH, RANGE ELEVEN WEST, IN THE RANCHO LAS
BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51. PAGE 13 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL OIL, PETROLEUM, NATURAL GAS, MINERAL RIGHTS AND OTHER
HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES IN, ON OR UNDER THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, BUT
WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF ENTRY ABOVE A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND
FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING FOR, EXTRACTING, MINING, BORING, REMOVING OR
MARKETING SAID SUBSTANCES, AS RESERVED BY DONALD M. SMITH AND OTHERS BY DEED
RECORDED JANUARY 20, 1960.
EXHIBIT B
A 112,.N.W.114,N.W 114,SEC 36,r SS.,R. W.
167-60isl • I.. iiR
rr a rALmr AYF�1►f/E• '
is x
a�N •��Ir ,
! l t PAR//
•i Pr 1J•"
SUBJECT SITE'
4
cvrtr wfw armrNnllr scNact ap
M
p 48t O •••
C IM/.
Q ! O
I
o
S 49 '
nM
ZIC rn MARCH 1992 PARCEL MAP P 11E 56-33,93.13 NOTE.ASSESSOR'S BLOCK K ASSESSOR'S AIAI
IARCfI NUMBERS BOOKI57►ACE40 ( )
SHOWN IN CIRCIES CO(WV.Of ORANGE
1 r.
# • __ First American mic insurance Company
THIS kW le FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND 11111 NOT A EMT Or THIS TfftX KYIDENCE
*-A
Ord. No. 3408
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the
City of Huntington Beach, and ex-ofcio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do
hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council
at a re ular meeting thereof held on the 14th dgy of December, 1998, and was again
read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of
January, 1999, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a
majority of all the members of said City Council.
AYES: Julien,Bauer, Garofalo, Dettloff
NOES: Green, Harman, Sullivan
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
I,Connie Brockway CITY CLERK of the City of
Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City
Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this
ordinance has been published in the Independent on
,19
In accordance with the City Charter of said City City Clerk and ex-of cio Clerk
Connie Brockway City Clerk of the City Council of the City
Deputy City Clerk of Huntington Beach, California
G/ordinanc/ordbkpg
I/6/99
ATTACHME
NT 6
1
u u.w
ENUE
s_
1,8
370
P "' P (OS - P)50
I �
N Li/vi S UZ E 1/2 SW 1/4
jSEC. 23-5-11 RM
CG'
OS - P
i r
639 36
--_ �- TALBERT AVENUE
r
•� 1 In t QW
- � 1. -EXISTING:P
• -.i
v ; =P tO QSED =C j JEL
so
fUujr
t w
300 Ix
STERLING AVENUE O zIr
Bt
Lu
C cc
i a R L
G
' pis
KINER AVENUEso
TAYLOR DRIVE
W
h
z TF --------
' ! `
A RM
SOURCE: Huntington Beach Gnat Plan May 13.1M
i
P-Public
OS-P-Park
N RM-Residential Medium Density
RMH-Residential High Density
RL-Residential Low Density General Plan
P(RL-7)-Public with underlying
low density residential Designations
CG-F1 -General Commercial
S maximum floor area ratio 0.35
CG-General Commercial
ATTACHMENT NO.
�
'"' TA
\^ i d a T
a
,
s9o_E RM
l9
: OP SP-1 390
W.LINE s fit s 1/2 sk u,
SEC. 23-5-11 RM 260 TO C
SP-1 23
y
(0) RA .
RL
tiS4 06
TALBERT AVENUE
RL
300
a� RL
RL
m4 EXISTING. PS"•CG
RL
S - PROPOSED: CG� U.
"!
c � �36 = RL
UJ
... xY.a„ ;n J_ilk r -• q-? .`x¢: \ It
ti
RL RL
STERLING AVENUE RLLU �•
RL y z a
RL 3
g
cRLa f RL S
a
KINER AVENUE ,•,..,s,; �,; -.``
•titi S
RL
RL '
t
so TAYLOR DRIVE ; A-
SOURCE-
C1 ^ RL RL RL RL RLU�� MHM Huntington 8mcn Zoning and Subdvaion Ordinance, PS.public-Semi Public
Saetional oisuict Maps.12118M
RL-Low Density Residential
N RM- Medium Density Residential
ASP-1 -Spacial Zone-Cemetery
(Q)RA-Qualified Residential Agriculture
(Subject to Future Zoning Amendment) Zoning Designations
CG-Commercial General
RMH -Residential High Density
�• a RL- PD -Low Density Residential-
Planning Development
TWHMENT NO.
RECEIVED
N 0 V 0 51998
OF
COMMUNITY DMEVELOPMENT
November 3, 1998
HAND DELIVER
Ms. Jane Madera
Associate Planner
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
RE: ZONING MAP •AMENDMENT NO. 97--1 a APPEAL
__.
Dear Jane:
I am in receipt of your letter dated October 29, 1998 and respectfully request an appeal to the
City Council for Zoning Map Amendment No.97-1 pursuant to the Huntington Beach Zoning and
Subdivision Ordinance. Enclosed herewith is Arnel Retail Group, Inc.'s Check No. 387 in the
amount of$1,490.00 for the filing fee of the appeal. We respectfully request that this appeal be
heard before the City Council concurrently with the Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 and
General Plan Amendment 97-1.
The justification for the appeal is that we would like to have the Environmental Impact
Report/General Plan Amendment/Zoning Map Amendment acted on concurrently by the City
Council.
If you have any further questions or require additional information, please don't hesitate to call.
i cerely yours,
Greg McClelland
GDM/srb
Enclosure
949 South Coast Drive Suite 600 Costa Mesa,California 92626 • 714 481-5000 • Fax 714 481-5083
ATTACHMENT 8
RESOLUTION NO. q G
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENCOURAGING APPLICATIONS FOR
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON LARGE PARCELS OF LAND
ADJACENT TO MAJOR ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS OR
OTHER VACANT OR UNDER UTILIZED PARCELS IN THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City desires to increase the commercial development opportunities at the
few remaining vacant or underutilized parcels in the city; and
A top priority of the City Council is to improve the City's revenue base; and
In pursuit of this goal, the City has analyzed commercial land use opportunities to expand
the city's retail sales tax, reduce retail sales tax leakage, and improve its overall economic base;
and
There are a limited number of large parcels adjacent to major arterials, including
vacant/surplus school sites or any other vacant or underutilized sites which may lend themselves
to commercial/retail development and which can accommodate the types of sales tax generators
desired,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the city of Huntington Beach does hereby
resolve as follows:
1: That the City shall review any commercial site plan that mitigates the potential
impacts to the surrounding neighborhood to the greatest extent possible, while still allowing for a
market driven development.
1
4`s:PCD:Reso1:Rctalref
06%25 96
RLS 96-428
_ATTACHMENT NO. �1�
2. That the City Council acknowledges and supports the required land use review and
public hearing process, the professional recommendations of City staff and the advisory role and
recommendations of the Planning Commission.
3. That the City Administrator is requested to work toward the pursuit of commercial
development opportunities on large parcels adjacent to major arterial highways, including
vacant/surplus school sites, or any other vacant or underutilized sites or parcels in the City of
Huntington Beach.
4. That the property owner/applicant for any such commercial/retail project shall pay
all entitlement fees necessary for the processing of the project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1996.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk. it Attorney
I ITUTED AND APPROVED: REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
Director of Comrntfnity Development City Administrator
/4 - 3 . 3
4ls:PCD:Resol:Retalref 2
9 6 ATT
RLS ACHMENT NO.
RLS 96—t28
x
6 Y
J' A";�4 .,�T Alf
H M-, EN,
� x
a
� � F
sir(
RETAIL AND FISCAL:IMPACT ANALYSIS .:
CREST VIEW SITE
CITY:OF. HUNTIN&ON-_BEACH
April.19,.1�98
Prepatect for:
City.of Huntington Beach::
20.00 Main Street
Huntington Beach,'California 92648
.STAN'LEY -R. H OFFMAN
Planning and Development Services A s ..a o c i A r' •E s
11661 San Vlcente Boulevard,Suite 505
Los Angeles,California 90049
Phone(310)820-2680•FAX(310)820-8341
_ATTACHMENT NO. �,�
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Tables and Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
Summary and Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
Chapter 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Project Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3 Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Chapter 2 Retail Sales Trends and Competitive Retail Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1 Retail Sales Trends �
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.2 Crest View Site Projected Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3 Competitive Retail Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Chapter 3 Demographics and Retail Demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.1 Household Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.2 Household and Median Income Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.3 Purchasing Power Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.4 Retail Capture/Leakage Analysis . . . . . 28
Chapter 4 Potential Retail Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.1 Sales Impacts with the Proposed Wal-Mart for 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.2 Sales Impacts with the Proposed Wal-Mart for 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
4.3 Competitive Centers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
4.4 Sales Impacts with Wal-Mart and Other Competitive Centers for 1997 41
4.5 Sales Impacts with Wal-Mart and Other Competitive Centers for 2010 41
Chapter 5 Fiscal Impact Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
5.1 Estimated Fiscal Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
5.2 Recurring Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
5.3 Recurring Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
i
ATTACHMENT NO.
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
Table
2-1 Retail Sales Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.
2-2 Total Retail Sales: Orange County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2-3 Total Retail Sales: Primary Market Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2-4 Total Retail Sales: Huntington Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2-5 Estimated Total Retail Sales for Entire Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2-6 Square Footage Allocation of a Typical Wal-Mart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2-7 Selected Retail Centers in the Primary Market Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2-8 Existing and Planned Wal-Marts in Orange County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3-1 1997 Household Income by Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3-2 Primary Market Area Household Growth: 1997 - 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3-3 Estimate of Purchasing Power for 1997 and 2010 . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3-4 Distribution of Total Retail Sales for 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3-5 Estimated 1997 Retail Sales Capture/(Leakage) for the Primary Trade Area . 32
3-6 Estimated 1997 Retail Sales Capture/(Leakage) for Huntington Beach . . . . . 33
3-7 Estimated 2010 Retail Sales Capture/(Leakage)for the Primary Trade Area . 35
3-8 Estimated 2010 Retail Sales Capture/(Leakage)for Huntington Beach . . . . . 36
4-1 Estimated General Merchandise Potential Compared to Existing Sales
with Wal-Mart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38.
4-2 Summary of Planned Commercial Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4-3 Estimated General Merchandise Potential Compared to Existing Sales
with Wal-Mart and Competitive Retailers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
5-1 General Fund Fiscal Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Figure
1-1 Regional Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1-2 Vicinity Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2-1 Total Retail Trends 1990-1995 . . . . . . 8
2-2 Sales Tax Revenues - Beach Boulevard and Environs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2-3 Site Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2-4 Typical Wal-Mart Floorplan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2-5 Competing Centers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2-6 Orange County Wal-Mart Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3-1 Household Income Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
ii
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
• In 1995, total retail sales per capita in Huntington Beach, of$7,402 were about 90.0
percent of the Orange County.average and. about 84.0 percent of the Primary...
Market Area average. .
• From 1990 to 1995, a dramatic decrease of 32.4% occurred in taxable retail sales
for the category of general merchandise for the City of Huntington Beach.
• Huntington Beach tends to capture a relatively smaller proportion, 31 to 37 percent,
of general merchandise retail sales compared to the county and the Primary Market
Area.
• Retail leakage is projected for the City of Huntington Beach for 1997 and is
expected to increase through 2010. The Primary Market Area is projected to be
more balanced.
• In the category of general merchandise, which is a major category for the proposed
Wal-Mart, significant leakage is estimated in 1997 and increasing by 2010 within the
City of Huntington Beach.
• As shown by the historic decline in general merchandise sales in Huntington Beach
from 1991 to 1996, the proposed Wal-Mart would assist Huntington Beach in
competing with big box centers in neighboring cities and likely result in sizable retail
sales being transferred back into the City that are now lost to adjacent jurisdictions.
• As identified in previous studies, the greatest share of retail sales leakage from the
City is occurring in three areas—restaurants, apparel and general merchandise. The
development of the Crest View site with a Wal-Mart could reduce the leakage in the
general merchandise category.
• A high volume or big box retailer in this area could serve as a catalyst for other
economic growth.
• The development of the Crest View site is proposed for a Wal-Mart with a garden
center for a total of 144,171 square feet and three freestanding pads comprising.
14,500 square feet. Estimated employment at buildout is 322 people.
• With the current estimated leakage in Huntington Beach in the general merchandise
category, it is estimated that Wal-Mart could be supported in the short-term with
demand projected to increase for additional general merchandise retailers in the
long-term.
• The net fiscal impact to the City of Huntington Beach General Fund is projected to
be very positive; $443.4 thousand in the short-term and $391.8 thousand in the
long-term.
ATTACHMENT NO-. �•�
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the potential economic impacts, both short and long-term, of the
proposed retail development on the Crest View site in the City of Huntington Beach. ,The
Crest View site, located on the southeast comer of Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue,
is currently owned by the Ocean View School District and is considered a surplus school
site. Proposed plans for this site include the development of 158,671 square feet of retail
space. Figure 1-1 shows the project site in a regional context.
1.1 Project Description
As shown in Figure 1-2, this 13.9 acre site is located east of Beach Boulevard (SR-39) on
the south side of Talbert Avenue. The surrounding uses include; the Good Shepard
Cemetery directly north of the site across Talbert Avenue; existing single family residential
immediately to the south and east sides of the project; and existing commercial businesses
along Beach Boulevard to the west. Access to the site is proposed to be provided from
Talbert Avenue.
A total of 158,671 square feet of retail and.garden center uses are proposed for this site
for an overall site floor area ratio (FAR) of about 0.26. Current plans for the site assume
the development of a Wal-Mart store with a garden center and three free standing pads.
including a restaurant, a fast food restaurant and other shops. The following are project
statistics including acres, square footage and estimated employment. Estimates for
employment assume a ratio of 500 square feet per employee for the retail and restaurant
uses and 300 square feet per employee for the fast food uses:
Estimated
Acres Square Feet Employment
Wal-Mart 11.99 134,740 269
Garden Center n/a 9.431 19
Subtotal 11.99 144,171 288
Free Standing Pads:
Restaurant 0.53 5,500 11
Fast Foot 0.61 3,500 12
Shops 0.72 5.500 1
Subtotal 1.86 14,500 34
Total 13.85 158,671 322
1
ATTACHMENT NO. q�
FIGURE 1-1
CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
REGIONAL LOCATION MAP
SAN
FERNANDO 9�F
+r
4} LA CANADA
VAN s W
NUYS r+rF w
VEHTtIRA GLENDALE
a � iAEEWAY -
i yt� PASADENA ARCADIA "aotl
FREEWAY
HOLLYWOOD r<
9i^� `�`�"+r yW BERNARpy� ff� AY COVINA ,
BEVERLY
HILLS
CULVER LOSS
CITY ANGELES INDUSTRY '
r+
< BELL +y+ WHtTTIER
Cot�+ty os ANOE
MARINA S Y Ujj
DEL RAY cowtY ai oFw�cE
• � F�'F �•\� HAWTHORNE BREA
v �y Y
ORBA
MANHATTAN L=A ARTEStA FREEW�i• �
BEACH
CARSON
LAKEWOOD
REDO I TORRANCE
BEA
` PALOS oActac co AST MGHWAY GARDEN 1�
VERDES LONG GROVE
LEEWAY
BEACH a��1EM cf''
a
ROLLING
WESTMINSTER
HILLS SEAL ` AM
BEACH ,
O�PR JECT SITE
HUNTINGTON BEACH
PACIFIC OCEAN
2 ATTACHMENT NO. q- (it
orookbunN slr 1 I(I I I I t
ice I11
I I . � II � .��.il I ,I� .•Iliujllllll% it �. '� • t (IrLI, 111 t .. LIIry, I 1 III
J I i i I I I I I III I I I�III . Bwhud SI I.�
I IIII III ,.. 1 ,�.� 1- iL
1, 1 I.I t1�1F.1 .' :' I In _ I I:, _, • - , �I. . L_ 1L: �Ia� i�I E.,.,
ITI1114 JJ1 tTf
- . '� 'I I ► � - •u� ►• -lrri� hi.onoll.sl.�1,� l� 1�� .III � � ��.�i s___ - �_�; • z
,1 . ..�� : �• .iI�L, .� AN III 11 N It• �rLLti
Tll �_a �
I. ,!�. '.I' I -•' ':� .l �. I II �I. �.�i:� ":�� In�rn,-• ':_[•=1 , fly
I __. II . I(d ) tril :I =� �.w is r+•,.luwsl III u.. is nIVy tl :t. 1 r_ INLU
��~ 1 Il , �Lla�I �-�- — — �i i�I I�l.i_j •; � _ iili r __�IJI .�
_19so Blvd Fi
_LL
� I -��il!�t
� , •. �LU a I i�11 , •1 , I 'q••r I,.� r �I III,. •L,,r r w .,.- I'r I I l r r' 6o1AI=f-f rl1 r• r•►•r !t �'• r- a I%
Golden W.•I SI
N
LL, L Y _ •� — tt'_ �' I� = I II. fi
w Edward:$l �I) II III LLI I I L111 :III
E) JAI �3. Jlill(li.
til
W J LIIIC_i 1_ i -$ ( l t � I .I. -•� III l M
_ . � _ ---111 I �•y h�•...I' I �.� I�." � I �� I l r S i l) I
LL I: I I.►:.,t n -mil , I I�•:I L I I 1 I �I I I 13 aprfnoav sl I1 I:.x i II I I117.
I II I R)
all m SO I I Ij I:.� I 1 I�.- to
II • w t111I11�\� II
U � , ; ll Illp' I .m
1. �l IIIIII I I Boca Chic.St l I I
tE
�I IIII�Y•
l 1,� �•:
• � O
Currently, no tenants have been identified at this time for the restaurant, fast food or retail
shop pads. While the City of Huntington Beach and the surrounding areas are largely built
out, additional infrastructure needs would include the provision of adequate ingress and
egress to the site, curb and gutter, sidewalks, utilities and other public improvements.
1.2 Approach
The purpose of this study is to determine the potential demand for the proposed center and
the projected impact of a retail development on the Crest View site on other retailers in the
primary trade area with a focus on those located in the City of Huntington Beach. Retail
sales from the development typically come from two sources:
(1) New purchasing power captured within the trade areas
(2) Transfer of purchases from existing retailers.
To the extent that the center will capture purchasing power that is leaking to surrounding
cities, local retailers in Huntington Beach will not be impacted. However, where the
center's sales directly compete with existing businesses, the transfer of sales from existing
retailers to the center could potentially negatively impact these local businesses. This
study examines the extent of this potential impact from both a short-term and long-term
perspective.
Definition of the trade area. The Primary Market Area has been identified as the cities of
Huntington Beach,Westminster and Fountain Valley and the unincorporated area of Bolsa
Chica. Given the location of the site, the southeast comer of Beach Boulevard and Talbert
Avenue, these cities are assumed to constitute a large part of the primary trade area that
the proposed development would draw from. Sales tax information, household income and
household demographics from these cities are used to examine the current retail structure
of the primary trade area. These characteristics are applied to the growth in population
and corresponding growth in households and their purchasing power characteristics.
The development of the Crest View site is assumed to generate some portion of its sales
from households outside the primary trade area given its easy access and close proximity
of several other cities and major freeways. In addition, some sales may be attributable to
the large visitor and tourist population associated with Huntington Beach, estimated at 11.0
million per year. The potential purchasing power from these sources has not been
quantified in this report.
nventoryof competitive retail supply. The competitive retail supply within the primary trade
area has been examined based on research through Urban Decision Systems (UDS), the
1997 Shopping Center Directory and field research by Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc.
The focus of the field research was on those existing and potential retailers who would
compete with the uses proposed for the Crest View site.
4
ATTACHMENT NO. '�. $
Estimation of retail demand. Calculation of short-term retail demand is based on the
number of households, household income, the estimated proportion of purchases made
within the primary trade area and retail expenditure propensity. Retail demand is also
projected for the year 2010 and is based on the projected growth in the number of
households and their purchasing power. The year 2010 is considered to represent buildout
for the purposes of this analysis. The future retail demand has been compiled for the.cities
of Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley and Westminster using the Southern California
Association of Governments' (SCAG) 1996 projections. Future development in the
unincorporated area of Bolsa Chica is based on information from the City of Huntington
Beach.
Retail sales impact of the Crest View site development Using the estimated retail demand
and the existing and projected retail supply, the impact of the Crest View site development
can be estimated for certain competitive retail categories. Qualitative judgements are also
made based on the location of the proposed center, attributes of major competitive retailers
and the future retail supply within the primary trade area.
Fiscal impact analysis. Based on the market analysis, net retail sales tax projections are
combined with other public revenues and costs to estimate the net fiscal impact of the
project on the City of Huntington Beach.
1.3 Report Overview
Chapter 2 presents the retail sales trends and competitive .retail inventory within the
primary trade area. Chapter 3 presents existing demographics and estimated retail
demand. Chapter 4 discusses the impact of retail demand versus potential supply for the
project area. Chapter 5 presents the net fiscal impacts of the Crest View retail site on the
City of Huntington Beach.
i
f
i
5
ATTACHMENT NO. �.
CHAPTER 2
RETAIL SALES TRENDS AND COMPETITIVE RETAIL INVENTORY
This chapter presents characteristics of the retail sales trends in Orange County and the
Primary Market Area comprised of the cities of Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley,
Westminster and the unincorporated area of Bolsa Chica. In addition, further detailed
information is presented for the City of Huntington Beach and local retail demand along
and near Beach Boulevard and the proposed site. This section also includes a discussion
of the competitive retail inventory and characteristics of a prototypical Wal-Mart store.
2.1 Retail Sales Trends
Table 2-1 is a summary of the total retail and total taxable sales trends for Huntington
Beach, the Primary Market Area, and Orange County. Historical retail sales information
is shown for purposes of illustrating the broader context for evaluating the Huntington
Beach retail market.
As shown in Panel A, the City of Huntington Beach total retail sales have declined over the
period from 1990 to 1995 in constant 1997 dollars. The Primary Market Area experienced
similar decreases over the time period, staying about even from 1994 to 1995. Orange
County total retail sales decreased from 1990 to 1993 and increased in 1994 and 1995.
Over the period from 1990 to 1995, total retail sales decreased by 19.4 percent in
Huntington Beach, 15.2 percent in the Primary Market Area and 10.2 percent in the
County.
As presented in Panel B, the City of Huntington Beach taxable retail sales have also
declined over the period from 1990 to 1995 in constant 1997 dollars. The Primary Market
Area experienced similar decreases over the time period, although showing less of a
decline.from 1994 to 1995 than:that of the City. Orange County taxable retail sales
decreased from 1990 to'1993 and increased in 1994 and 1995. Over the period from 1990
to 1995, taxable retail sales decreased by 20.6 percent in Huntington Beach, 14.9 percent
in the Primary Market Area and 9.0 percent in the County.
Figure 2-1 shows per capita retail sales trends for 1990 to 1995 for the City of Huntington
Beach, the Primary Market Area and Orange County. As can be seen, per capita retail
sales decreased from 1990 to 1993 for all of the areas. Retail sales have continued to
decrease for the City of Huntington Beach and the Primary Market Area, while the County
has experienced slight increases.
Orange County
Table 2-2 presents the total retail sales trends in the County of Orange from 1990 to 1995.
As shown, total retail sales in the County have decreased from $23.8 billion in 1990
6
ATTACHMENT NO.
TABLE 2-1
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
RETAIL SALES TRENDS
(in thousands of constant 1997 dollars)
City of Huntington eac Primary kilarketArea' range County
Total Annual% Total . Annual% Total Annual%
l Year Reta Sales Change Retail Sales Changes Retail Sales Change
Pane I-A:Total Retail Sales'..
1990 $1,676.738 WA $3,325.109 WA $23,811,397 WA
1991 1.552,266 -7.4% 3,109,947 -6.5% 22,311,172 -6.3%
1992 1,493,389 -3.8% 3,059,028 -1.6% 21,876,542 -1.9%
1993 1,433,418 -4.0% 2,888,499 -5.6% 20,723,844 -5.3%
1994 1,412,764 -1.4% 2,887,433 -0..0% 21,154.174 2.1%
1995 1,404,849 -0.6% 2,885,687 -0.1% 21,610,422 2.2%
Change from
1990-1995 ($271,889) -19.4% ($439,423) -15.2% ($2,200,975) -10.2%
.'Panel:& Total;Taxabie_Retail Sales:
1990 $1,440,995 WA $2,862,478 WA $20,561,678 WA
1991 1,305,461 -9.4% 2,624,052 -8.3% 18,896,938 -8.1%
1992 1,238,522 -5.1% 2,557,757 -2.5% 18,346,124 -2.9%
1993 1,223,363 -1.2% 2,474,794 -3.2% . 17.875,390 -2.6%
1994 1,211.266 -1.0% 2,496,057 0.9% 18,418,797 3.0%
1995 1,194,519 -1A% 2,491,621 -0.2% 18,871,442 2.5%
Change from
1990-1995 ($246,476), -20.6% ($370,857) -14.9% ($1,690,236) -9.0%
Notes: 1. The primary market area includes the cities of Huntington Beach,Fountain Valley,
Westminster and the unincoporated area of Bolsa Chica.
2. Taxable retail sales for the categories of drug stores and food stores have been increased
to estimate total retail sales because about 65 percent of drug store sales and about 32 percent
of food store sales are taxable,
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
California State Board of Equalization
7
ATTACHMENT NO. 9• l�.
FIGURE 2-1
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,COUNTY OF ORANGE AND PRIMARY MARKET AREA
TOTAL RETAIL TRENDS 1990-1995
(In Current 1997 Dollars)
$11 '
0
0
$10
c
N
R
Cn $9
N .
$8
tC
U
a�
a
$7
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
Year
♦ Orange County Primary Market Area $Huntington Beach
Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inca
California State Board of Equalization
8
ATTACHMENT NO. `�•�Z
TABLE 2-2
TOTAL RETAIL SALES: ORANGE COUNTY
(in thousands of constant 1997 dollars)
%Change
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1987-1995
Retail Store Category
Apparel stores $1,343.803 .$1,302,028 $1,245,781 $1,238,911 $1.263.463 $1,234,885 -8.1%
General merchandise stores 2,969,825 2,802.754 2,839,782 2,760,615 2,822,WA 2.860,017 -3.7%
Drug stores' 627.993 636.544 696.876 643.378 643.067 620,556 -12%
Food stores' 4,482.116 4.721,232 4.861.572 3,879,851 3,712,573 3,729,737 -16.8%
Packaged liquor stores 196,227 177,709 170.070 151,490 145,650 147,268 -25.0%
Eating and drinking places 2,699.859 2,586,796 2,476,777 2,452,235 2,504,798 2,558,562 -52%
Home Fumish.and appliances 1,189,868 1,077,561 992,717 973286 1,065,497 1,115.128 -6.3%
Bldg.material and farm Impints. 1,605,567 1,349.593 1,242,510 1.228,057 1.235,420 1,253,739 -21.9%
Auto dealers and auto supplies 3.577.362 2,876,113 2,715,618 2,775,241 2,895.387 3,104,207 -13.2%
Service stations 1,572,675 1.419,456 1,483.454 1.446,239 1,422.984 1,439,390 -8.5%
Other retal stores 3,546,102 3,361.387 3,151,385 3.174.541 3,442.351 3,546.933 0.0%
Retall Stores Total $23,811,397 $22,311,172 $21.876,542 $20,723,844 $21.154.174 $21,610,422 -92%
CountywkiePopulation 2,326,211 2.453,277 2,512,198 2,557,346 2,596,511 2,641.355 13.5%
Beta®Saks Per Capita $10,236 $9,094 $8,708 $8,104 $8,147 $8,182 -20.1%
Notes: 1. Taxable retail sales for the categories of drug stores and food stores have been Increased by factors of 1.55 and
3.08 respectively,to estimate total retall sales.
Source: Stanley R Hoffman Associates,Inc.
California State Board of Equalization
9
ATTACHMENT NO.
to $21.6 billion in 1995. The Countywide population increased over this same time period
from 2,326,211 to 2,641,355. On a per capita basis, total retail sales have decreased from
$10,236 in 1990 to $8,182 per capita in 1995, a decrease of about 20.1 percent. Retail
sales increased in 1994 and 1995 to about$21.2 billion and $21.6 billion, respectively. In
1993 retail sales were at their lowest, estimated at $20.7 billion, or $8,104 per capita.
None of the retail categories showed an increase over the period from 1990 to 1995,
although the category of other retail stores remained about the same. The largest
percentage decreases by retail store category occurred in the areas of packaged liquor
stores (25.0 percent), building materials and farm implements (21.9 percent), food stores
(16.8 percent) and auto dealers and auto supplies (13.2 percent).
Primary Market Area
Table 2-3 presents the total retail sales trends for the Primary Market Area, which includes
the cities of Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley and Westminster and the unincorporated
area of Bolsa Chica. Similar to those characteristics exhibited in the Countywide trends,
total retail sales in the Primary Market Area have decreased from $3.3 billion in 1990 to
about $2.9 billion in 1995, a decrease of about 13.2 percent. With the population
increasing over the same time period from 321,415 to 328,253, the overall per capita retail
sales has decreased. In 1990 per capita retail sales were estimated at $10,345 and in
1995 the per capita retail sales were estimated at $8,791, a decrease of about 15.0
percent.
With the exception of other retail stores which experienced an increase of about 3.3
percent, total retail sales decreased in all categories over the period from 1990 to 1995.
The largest decreases occurred in the categories of packaged liquor stores (39.4 percent),
building materials and farm implements (28.2 percent) and general merchandise stores
(21.6 percent).
City of Huntington Beach
Table 2-4 shows the total retail sales trends for the City of Huntington Beach for the years
1990 through 1995. As with the County and the Primary Market Area, total retail sales
have declined from an estimated $1.7 billion in 1990 to about $1.4 billion in 1995, a
decrease of about 16.2 percent. Average per capita retail sales have decreased from
$8,750 in 1990 to about$7,402 in 1995, a decrease of about 15.4 percent. This decrease
is primarily due to the drop in total retail sales since the population in Huntington Beach is
estimated to have decreased to 189,795 in 1995 from 151,630 in 1990.
Those retailing categories in the City of Huntington Beach that have experienced the
greatest loss from 1990 to 1995 include packaged liquor stores (39.6 percent), building
materials and farm implements (34.8 percent) and general merchandise stores (32.8
percent). Only the retail category of apparel stores has made a slight increase over this
time period at 6.3 percent.
10
ATTACHMENT NO. �.��I
TABLE 2-3
TOTAL RETAIL SALES: PRIMARY MARKET AREA'
(in thousands of constant 1997 dollars)
%Change
1990 1991 1992 1993 19" 1995 1987-1995
Retail Store Category
Apparel stores $140.523 $136,413 $136,300 $140,605 $135.043 $129,285 -8.0%
General merchandise stores 528,930 494.496 491.537 441,771 425,796 414,669 -21.6%
Drug stores" 87,590 86.613 98,493 88,333 79,435 78,500 -10.4%
Food stores' 639,028 673,989 690,516 5W,188 $37,799 542.274 -15.1%
Packaged liquor stores 30,337 25.774 23,208 21.099 19,333 18,390 -39.4%
Eating and drip ft places 302,385 289,660 275,300 268.438 270,985 273,128 -9.7%
Home Fumish.and appliances 200,340 181,055 170.727 160,483 167,535 171,262 -14.5%
Bldg,material and farm hpints. 191.238 153.833 149,803 145,928 152,318 137,339 -28.2%
Auto dealers and auto supplies 526,438 444.308 409,460 427,528 433,007 462,301 -122%
Service stations 242,949 212,896 219,231 220,007 210.900 208,688 -14.1%
Other retal stores 435,351 410,910 394,453 408,117 455,281 449,850 3.3%
Retail Stores Total $3,325,109 $3,109,947 $3,059,028 $2,888,499 $2,887,433 $2,885,W7 -132%
Population 321,415 315,285 318,752 322,198 325,731 328253 2.1%
%tat Sales Per Capita $10,345 $9,864 $9.597 $8,965 $8,864 $8,791 -15.0%
Notes: 1. The Primary Market Area includes the cities of Huntington Beach,Fountain Valley,Westminster and the
unincorporated area of Bolsa Chica.
2. Taxable retall sales for the categories of drug stares and food stores have been increased by factors of 1.55 and
3.08 respectively,to esfunate total retail sales.
Source: Stanley R Hoffman Associates,Inc.
California State Board of Equaf¢ation
11
ATTACHMENT NO. 9���
TABLE 2.4
TOTAL RETAIL SALES: HUNTINGTON BEACH
(in thousands of constant 1997 dollars)
%Change
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1990-1995
Retail Store Category
Apparel stores $62,746 $61.872 $61,524 $71,175 $69,574 $66,695 6.3%
General merchandise stores 190,001 173,078 172,835 160,465 135,920 127,593 -32.8%
Drug stores' 46,429 46,138 50,424 45,116 39,708 42,640 -8.2%
Food stores' 324,686 341,219 350.905 287,337 277,507 289.046 -11.0%
Packaged liquor stores 20,808 16,996 15,386 14,257 12,555 12,575 -39.6%
Eating and drinking places 165,341 161,039 149.974 147,557 150,341 152,081 -8.0%
time Furnish.and appliances 124,920 114.021 103,640 98,415 103,922 100,393 -19.6%
Bldg.material and farmirrpints. 141,699 115,169 90,296 94,441 113,252 92,445 -34.8%
Auto dealers and auto supplies 279.436 230,344 217,968 236,402 237.715 246.747 -11.7%
Service stations 118,477 104,214 103.149 106,649 102,459 103,091 -13.0%
Other retail stores 202,196 188,177 177.289 171,604 169,809 171,543 -15.2%
Retail Stores Total $1,676,738 $1,552,266 $1,493,389 $1,433,418 $1,412,764 $1,404,849 -16.2%
Population 191.630 182,783 184,962 186,866 189.159 189.795 -1.0%
Retal Sales Per Capita $8.750 $8,492 $8,074 $7,671 $7,469 $7.402 -15.4%
Notes: 1. Taxable retail sales for the categories of drug stores and food stores have been increased by factors of 1.55 and
3.08 respectively,to estimate total retail sales.
Source: Stanley R Floffman Associates,Inc.
CaBfomia State Board of Equalization
12
ATTACHMENT NO. 9.I�
Beach-Boulevard and Environs
Figure 2-2 presents the sales tax revenue trends from 1991 to 1996 in current dollars and
constant 1997 dollars. As shown in 1997 constant dollars, sales tax revenues declined
from a high in 1991 of about $6.75 million to a low of about $5.75 million in 1995.
Moderate gains in sales tax revenues have occurred from 1995 to 1996.. Information
presented in Figure 2-2 is based on taxable retail activity for the area along Beach
Boulevard from Adams Avenue, north to the San Diego Freeway (1-405). In addition,
taxable retail activity along key arterials adjacent to Beach Boulevard are also included,
such as Edinger Avenue and the Huntington Center.
As noted in the October 1995, Edinger Corridor Economic Market Study, prepared by
Cunningham &Associates,this area while having a strategic location and strong consumer
demographics has suffered declining retail sales in recent years. In 1993 the J. C. Penney
department store located at the Huntington Center moved to the neighboring city of
Westminster at their regional mall. The impact of that move is assumed to account for a
portion of the drop in retail sales tax from 1993 to 1994, as shown in Figure 2-2. In
addition,the sale of the Broadway chain to Federated Department Stores in 1995 resulted
in the closing of the Broadway, also located at Huntington Center.
2.2 Crest View Site Projected Sales
As shown in Table 2-5, based on average Wal-Mart and estimated project proponent sales
data, total retail sales for the proposed development are estimated at about $50.6 million
assuming buildout and full occupancy of the project. The largest proportion of these sales
are projected to be from the proposed Wal-Mart at $46.0 million or about 91.0 percent of
the total center sales. The remaining sales are estimated at $2.2 million from the other
retail pads, $1.4 million.from the restaurant and $1.0 million from sales related to the fast
food restaurant. Figure 2-3 depicts the proposed site plan for the Crest View site
development.
Figure 2-4 is a typical floor plan for a Wal-Mart store, based on field research, which is
assumed to occupy the largest retail pad of about 134,740 square feet and is projected to
have associated sales of about $46.0 million. General merchandise product offerings
through a typical Wal-Mart store include the following:
• Apparel and accessories
• Building materials and garden supplies
• Packaged snack food
• Automotive supplies and service
• Furniture and home furnishings
• Food service
• Prescription and non-prescription Drugs
• Miscellaneous retail items
13
ATTACHMENT NO. �•��
FIGURE 2-2
SALES TAX REVENUES-BEACH BOULEVARD AND ENVIRONS
$7,000
$6,500
0
0
0
v
cxa $6,000
H
M -
d
N
C0
$5,500
$5,000
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Calendar Year
-m-- Current Dollars
+ 1997 Constant Dollars
Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc.
Hinderliter de Llamas and Associates
14
ATTACHMENT NO. rI•/
TABLE 2-5
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
' ESTIMATED TOTAL RETAIL SALES FOR ENTIRE CENTER
tonal Total
Square Sales per Estimated
Feet • - Square Foot Sales
Wal-Mart 144,171 $319 $46,000,000
Shops 5,500 400 2,200,000
Restaurant 5,500 255 1,400,000
Fast Food 3,500 286 1,000,000
Total 158,671 $319 $50,600,000
Source: Stanley R Hoffman Associates,Inc.
Amel Development
15
ATTACHMENT Na. f 4
FIGURE 2-3
CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
SITE PLAN
TALBERT AVEY'JE
F-----•—•----•—•--•-----•--•--- _._.-_-_. _.._.-- — —• __ --
rn i i I, -
'.. J,T_'r(yrj'1,F�'l =( �y j�Q�,.;4J'I'1'��("y0ry� ' r
Me 111/111/ 1 i 1 11'111,11� I
I A, A
x wtibn RfTAt.
\ \,
to \ \
I
I ••V HUNTINGTON BEACH,
tam N
I �) GENERAL. RETAIL
u SITE PLAN
TN3'qM MM WA3 M19AAm WMl(Kff • +
TM[bDdMT Of A DOLMART UM". v��� `�
AREAS AND OeRAMM FRESOM)HUMM A�R�hail& br-
AM*LMJWr TO YVWlCATIOM LIrOM ■r1r •wr�r..r.ww• w
COMPL Erm"Of SuRvty.
FIGURE 2-4
CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
TYPICAL WAL-MART FLOORPLAN
iaranap Restrooms
F b abricits C�'es ��^9 Homo Derrustungs Shoos Cwfs Infant's 6 Boys
Yyaar •Toddlers Wear
wear
5
Car Jewelry socks&
Care Hardware Hosiery
&Paint Electronicsj L lUens
S�o� d mates k�ti Wear
Plus
8 Cards Sme Fdhny
Toys Housewares Room
Games &Appliances o Lades Wear
E
J."
,
w Restrooms
<
Pet Customer
��... o Seasonal Supplies E BHealth& CHECKOUT sen^�
o �, Desk
V
One-Hour
Photo
Ptmma,y Yisioa Center Portrait
studio
ENTRANCE
Source: WaI-Mart Stores, Inc.
17 ATTACHMENT NO. �-Z1
Table 2-6 presents an estimate of square feet by product category for a prototypical Wal-
Mart store with approximately 144,171 square feet. As the table shows, the largest uses
include apparel, household and personal supplies and home fashions and appliances.
2.3 Competitive Retail Inventory
Existing Retail Inventory
Table 2-7 presents a listing of selected retailers in the primary trade area that could
compete with the proposed retail uses planned for the Crest View site. As shown on the
table and identified in Figure 2-5, an estimated 5.6 million square feet have been identified
and include 2.53 million square feet in the City of Huntington Beach, about 843.7 thousand
square feet in the City of Fountain Valley and 2.19 million square feet in the City of
Westminster. Because of the diversity of the products that could be offered by the mix of
retailers proposed for the center, this listing includes a variety of retailers, including
department stores, grocery stores, discount department stores, big box retailers and larger
specialty retailers.
Currently in the City of Huntington Beach, there is one K-Mart located at Garfield and
Magnolia. Discussions with management at K-Mart indicated that their store would directly
compete with the retail uses proposed for the Crest View retail site. Although the impacts
of the Wal-Mart on this particular center cannot be specifically quantified, the staff
indicated that they would implement various strategies to maintain their customer base.
These strategies include having the store open additional hours, competitive pricing with
Wal-Mart and weekly newspaper advertising which Wal-Mart does not do at this time.
The City of Huntington Beach also has one Target store located at Adams and Brookhurst.
In addition, a Target store is also located in The Pavilion Center in the City of Westminster
(at Beach Boulevard and Heil Avenue). This center also includes a Vons grocery store and
a Bed, Bath and Beyond as well as several in-line shops.
While there are many strip retail and other businesses that line Beach Boulevard, in
addition to other major arterials and throughout the primary trade area, with the exception
of selected retailers mentioned above, many of these uses are not viewed as being directly
competitive. Typically, these centers contain one or more eating establishments, a bar or
liquor store, dry cleaners, laundromat, car washes, auto dealers, small grocery stores and
other local services. While selected retailers may be more or less impacted than the
average, these businesses can continue to compete due to their convenience and service
orientation and local serving retail uses.
Future Competitive Retail Development
Future development in the City of Huntington Beach includes a wide range of land uses
such as residential, commercial and hotel uses. Key future retail sites in the area include
18
ATTACHMENT NO. Z�
TABLE 2-6
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOCATION OF A TYPICAL WAL-MART'
Category Square Feet
Home fashions,appliances 15.131
Furniture 5,174
Home electronics 6,038
Apparel 33,124
Shoes 3,109
Jewelry 1,437
Cards,gifts,stationary,books 2.581
Household,personal supplies 19,504
Sewing and needlework 4,479
Recreational/sporting goods 3,805
Hobbies,toys and games 4.669
Optical goods 2,065
Camera and photographics 2,525
Hardware 2,806
Paint and wallpaper 2,806
Candy and selected food items 3,020
Luggage and leather goods 1.122
Automotive supplies 8,621
Eating and drinking 2,010
Drugs,etc. 1,800
Nursery,lawn and garden 9.431
Subtotal 135,259
Courtesy desk 5,747
Check out area I=
Subtotal 8,912
Total 144.171
Notes: 1. Estimated based on a field survey of a prototypical Wal-Mart
by Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates, Inc.
19
ATTACHMENT NO.
TABLE 2-7
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH:CREST VIEW SITE
SELECTED RETAIL CENTERS IN PRIMARY MARKET AREA
Map Year Square
Codel Center Opened Type Fact Anchors
1 Ctothestime Rrie Point Plaza 1985 Neighborhood 46.307 Clothestime;Big 5,Blockbuster
2 Huntington Collection 1970 Neighborhood 96.302 The Good Guys,Mar3hans
3 Huntington Furnishings Mart 1982 Neighborhood 78,500 Angelus Furniture
4 Huntington South Center 1972 Neighborhood 64.500 Lucky Discount Supermarket
5 Landmark Plaza 1976 Neighborhood 72.803 Vons Supermarket
6 Sherlane N/A Neighborhood 45.682 Office Depot
7 Unnamed Shopping Center 1973 Neighborhood 60.000 Ralph's Grocery
32 Albertson's/Ross 1983 Neighborhood 157.202 Sav-on
Neighborhood Total 454.094
5 Albertson's Center 1977 Community 138.000 Albertson!3;Oshman's Sporting Goods
9 Brookfield Promenade 1967 Community 107.862 Pep Boys-Manny.Mae&Jack;Pets Mart
10 Huntington Harbour Mail 1968 Community 100,000 Hughes Market
11 Huntington Village N/A Community 144,000 VoWs-.Sav-On Drugs
12 Loehmann's 5 Point Plaza 1964 community 155.000 Hunt.Cinema;Loehmann's,Pier 1,Trader Joes
13 Meadowlark Plaza 1995 Community 127.605 Long's Drugs:Ralph's Grocery
14 Newland Center 1981 Community 166,492 Lucky Discount Supermarket Mother's Market
15 Unnamed Center N/A Community 80,000 K-Mart
16 Seacllff Village 1976 community 125,000 Lucky Discount Supermarket
33 Target Center 1983 Community 148,392 Blockbuster
Community Total 1.143,959
17 Huntington Beach Mall 1967 Super Regional 934,343 Burlington;Circuit City;Mervyn's:Wards
Super Regional Total 934.343
Total Huntington Beach 2.532.396
W,
M,
18 Fountain Shopping Center is" Neighborhood 73,000 Alpha Beta-.EmergiiWnte7*
19 Magnolia Plaza 1975 Neighborhood 59,650 Hughes Market
Neighborhood Total 132,650
20 Callen Comer 1986 Community 152,116 Lucky Discount Supermarket
21 Fountain Valley Plaza 1974 community 116,000 Albertson'r Cline's Stantionary
22 Fountain Valley Promenade 1989 Community 188.070 Payless Drugs;Ralph's Grocery,T.J.Maxx
23 Price Club Plaza 1991 Community 254A71 PetsMart PriceCostco:Sports Authority
Community Total 711,057
Total Fountain Valley 843.707
24 Brookhurat Fashion Plaza 1987 Neighborhood 57.499 Clothestime.Millers Outpost,Payless-Shoes
25 Fairchild Center 11961 Neighborhood 67.970 McDonak:13,TG&Y
26 Westhaven North Shopping Center 1974 Neighborhood 70.000 Brentwood S&L,Bike Barn,Sound Idea
27 Westminster Plaza 1976 Neighborhood 90.000 Alpha Beta
Neighborhood Total 285.469
28 Best Plaza Westminster Community 129,662 Best Buy,Best Products
29 The Pavillon 1985 Community 305.898 Pavilions Supermarket,Target
30 Westminster Center 1991 Community 369,800 Hollytron,Home Depot Lucky's.Thfft Drug
Community Total 805.260
31 Westminster MaN 1974 Regional 1,095-000 RobinsoWs.-May,Sears,JCPenney,Ed.Cinemas
Regional Total 1,095.000
Total Westminster 2.185.729
Total primary Market 5.661.832
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
1997 Shopping Center Directory
20
ATTACHMENT NO.
FIGURE 2-5
CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
COMPETING RETAIL CENTERS
"{ L.n rnt.111n b .. u.cj
UUt NA•••_•••• .EC.E.t,ONAI�� J--- *Fl+f• � -�� l,�OtN
�IAV.V PARK w<<�,® �N Ott ,, e, ,�R„
T OerAafut• uncaN NRR ® rI7 a AVE r"Wow
t� it.so 11-TCOUIGI ® a.ISO _ hI
i GYP ESS a T>wYPAM ANA EI o
M AM WrF
�M A
�Lyy�Q N� Vt (/
9 /.Alt s ED LAll \yG ® Al t ID ED
ANAMt1M KOA® V _
M
li
tOTA4AR1Oi VA CA ■ GIRKII AVE y,tytr
DUCE LTJVRSt EYY GTKfYtAND CPGf.
CERMTOS AVE DISN[riANO WfRpt� ■tea
J f! S1
COtFI f KAIatA AVE KATatA a
/\ �IVAACE CD
ALAMITO� AlAVP STANTON r INANIM ■ O` :D[v,,Hr1`
CONVIMTIGM CIMitf
tL 13 Dlv// ORANG[,v00D Is.IS AVt i 0"WAW000 AVE AMAMI�
/ s sem M
ARMED roacts(T
POND/ROSA
°tAf" Tf4vfl Ill IARR /
XMIrRVE Im'"d. i > C.T.&•
Et.IS n At D" A
OLD GARDEN ER�OYE ®M�EvCAROtM pO~vt
- 4Yase. G OVEN �i ro
M[AR�RT
~ GARDEN GROVE move EtvD // !N CG
E TRASK AVE AIVER view a
U.S. NAVAL cs;�A WESTM NSTER 99 EREEWAY
MSiAUNST[R Kb WISIMINSt4 AVf
AVE s30
�a 27 f� 3 25 /1 �f Du'ia E .D.En
WEAPONS .� Q 3 WKIOIYICX/t EA/IIAAl4 aDauAt
28 6? a•b 1_ CAWVS
° + Midway �! .....
STATION &WA 31 City Avg ISTIn
slaK
M z SANTA ANA
�cattic'�i sr
!'--1 taNGa 3 26 AVE 4 A
Huntington
�,A taNGtR
Harbour 11 29 �' sou ^,: +crrtrrNMul
C) Q CD PC / _ ArD,ONAI RIA
NuMnMl:raw, < M�"D0M'f� ;�' •' //
J J 10 13 .7,,S f sg � twRMeR 17 Mo CqLas AVE t
�_ • 7 2 ,a FOUNTAIN
• ?QUA C,tECA VALLf Us / SEGIfSTROM Tit er
lc010`0�E
N�:A1 �KA� 23
\ `Y t Vt EL is p
DoLm �,� iH CEEf"M 10Rcmium WE A®$• I4NRT AW A44R11N1E i Etvo
Ultu 21 /, ronN
�. Avg DR1"aoRAwCO4
12 ttus MIT
Avt a*fF suNrt INOA mrs aMrtK
20 Mir sourN esya oL ■■ +
saAQI • /rni �! 1 "'Sto 19 AVE 9 / 1a
r'
fq .-. ,$ ,.OIESA vEAtx 8 , 1�
►ARa nt 1 •\ 16 •? %/0. 1nauE "KIR AVE .awlYAr
cgw►RsFu1) 33 I iJ
caw
1
CITY HUNTINGTON m __.r__ADMAS
suRR'"""0N'I 8 Ca'* FAAIARGA Nos /
CWA MESA AwnfrwfA,A+�_„� tvrrA ANA �
OEAat ATtAI..l 4 IW_ 4;1,•:. Jt-; tuR A+7���WNs oA,'�EA°t
0 TA
L s��•�DrrLOME1WGrrRAr
NAKfT NITA mme NAMKiON AVE ' % MESA
gT
"-fRAAMM
IIUNTINGTON TAIJERT VIRTUAL
hr-eve
..MATwc WOORW • ' dj 1rYt LAr f
STATE aFAUI 1 10
Jy
1pM z - � NEWPORT
SUIT Sfptt,W y j. BEACH
CAAtIGApyMO A�`Z .r cc:[ ;J
\� CDWTAYQD
/Y \\ 1 Lt/ACR MTCWK
LVRAA .t.\ 1
21 ATTACHMENT NO.�ZS
a vacant school site, Rancho View School, located in the City of Huntington Beach near
Warner just east of Beach Boulevard. This site is approximately 18.0 acres and could
accommodate an estimated 213,000 square feet of commercial uses based on preliminary
data from the City of Huntington Beach.
The Rancho View School site is located approximately one mile north of the proposed
Crest View site development. While specific plans for this site are not known, it is possible
that a home improvement type store or a big box retailer could locate at this site and
compete with the Crest View site. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that 50.0
percent of the potential square footage, or 106,500 square feet, could be competitive with
the Crest View retail site.
Other future competitors include the future Wal-Mart currently under construction in the
City of Westminster at the comer of Beach Boulevard and Trask Avenue,just south of the
Garden Grove Freeway. The relocation of the Home Depot to the Ocean View school site
may also present some limited competition. The impacts of these competitors are
discussed further in Chapter 4.
Status of Wal-Mart Developments in Orange County
As shown in Table 2-8 and Figure 2-6, there are a total of eight existing and future Wal-
Marts located in Orange County. Of the eight, four are currently open and are located in
Laguna Niguel, Foothill Ranch, Anaheim and Santa Ana. The four planned stores are
located in Westminster, Brea, San Clemente and Huntington Beach.
22,
ATTACHMENT NO.146
TABLE 2-8
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
EXISTING AND PLANNED WAL-MART'S IN ORANGE COUNTY
Estimated
Location Center Name Major Cross Streets Square Feet' Status
1 Anaheim Anaheim Plaza Crescent and Euclid 153.192 Opened January 1995
2 Foothill Ranch Town Center Portola Parkway and Alton Parkway 133,904 Opened May, 1995
3 Laguna Niguel The Marketplace La Paz and Avila Road 139,512 Opened October 1995
4 Brea Brea Union Plaza Imperial and Kraemer Blvd. 151,626 Approved
5 San Clemente N/A Avenida Pico and La Plata N/A Approved
6 Westminster Gateway Center NWC Trask and Beach 134.740 Approved by CC
7 Huntington Beach Crest View SEC Talbert and Beach 134,740 Proposed
8 Santa Ana Westside Marketplace McFadden and Harbor 135,000 Opened January 1998
w Notes: 1. Square footage estimates include garden center areas which are outside of the actual building.
Source: Stanley-R. Hoffman Associates, Inc.
C7 '
rn
i
x I�"'..\ i r.f••'t- I �.wr rev_ —L �J•. ..••� �� p++ •�,•�•'�� �_ ^ '
1 s LA HIIRA• /
•�:'.�. t @-ILA MIRADA.: T D .►.. ::__.__r;_:v,- !/cam}���;r�
•`+ ... .1.:.a.. ,.•' ° c.�°•us wnu '� ,...y' .• �rtnL��e_I` r�r .i'!ruua '•, 1
LINOA rt----- I
Ft IL TON t� i.'� 1 '� ,y i�•:1. ••'; ,ate,.
PLACENTIA
i.-ill `� _ � `• 1 j,�_ _ •- - - �'-,�•-• s--� � �.I r��''� � '-".C—`••r=.. , :r
I •- - -- styes SF 1,/' .�•�/ y`—•a �' .
!I BUENA M•1 Grp. - i 1. I ;
PARK L '- • .T� .. .-,- /�. ^r••As,l ='' ;.'rfr �; i `+` I '• ,
cYr Ess t= ANA EIM •-z`�:, ��,j. •---:-':.=-r� -,� ' I L
• - • ES •.1'.� �y1 i�
UN SfOH - -�\ •�t�= •• ���r r'�';.cs. '�:�. �;;a, } ` __
— = - - —- - �'/ ~`„ •RANGE ,f` w:r w+jlw.,./✓ ...-• I
GAItOEN t• -- ` � { - -urw.l �l`F a'.ti , II A�rr�_ta,r
GLOVE
.. -. ' .LL• t �. is wW u , ` s:•
�TUSTTIN - s ♦' ° • f ,
- a' �� �• , ..-
a• t _ SANTA ANA _-': .. �+ •?Y�F r t ;�.��.`` -• �>.....
•�...,- -s - -•- � - _•a•1-.s'�—\ r _ _ 1 \� .. � ;{ram-v._...�, ��� �,+..-
N FOUNTAIN
-- VALLEY a YIWw•imAN �•�••- 'f
Aw—
��� - .r '� 5j} • f �I r'"-'.. i i:: ;W °are. t•rr � �� +' �-.-.'tom•
Y pAIO/
- ;�,a• HUNTINGTON „;f....,.,.—�..•..�� ., �� � �� r. 1' � + �,^_, ti >, ,-
-.' ,� I BEACH
LAR
i, ..^... . �f^ �' I♦ 5. 1" - IRVINE I ..� ,•._ �"y • r`"' r 4 .
MOR
.., / BEACH iA.:. +\��.. S t} .... `� rl.. ..#'_.ass''�'•i•�•�- i'
l g� A 'tMUM
onA
Legend .�_�.,; T..r..« .. , , US
Existing Wal-Mart Locations �ws^ f�wM ,x,► "W.�-�a +Y MIVIEJO
SSION
Future Wal-Mart Locations
• ., ,...t, t;,� 1 ( Tom• `'
... +\ �. f• ..�:...�.f
SAMt1WNr•
FIGURE 2-6 O ""' • ,� ' T_
CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE '-
ORANGE COUNTY WAL-MART LOCATIONS rc ♦w ``' '
24 ATTACHMENTL . �•Z�
CHAPTER 3
DEMOGRAPHICS AND RETAIL DEMAND
This chapter presents the demographic analysis and retail demand projections for the City
of Huntington Beach and the Primary Market Area. Certain demographic indicators are
used as the basis for a quantitative estimate of retail demand for goods within the City and
the Primary Market Area.
3.1 Household Income
Table 3-1 shows the distribution of households by income group for the City of Huntington
Beach and the Primary Market Area. This distribution is based on information from the
1990 Census where households are defined as all related or unrelated persons living in
housing units, excluding persons living in group quarters.
City of Huntington Beach
For the City of Huntington Beach, those households that have incomes more than $75,000
comprise the largest proportion, or about 36.4 percent of the total. The second largest
category is the range from $50,000 to $74,999 at about 24.2 percent of the total. The
composition of the primary trade area is very similar. The overall median household
income for 1997 for the City of Huntington Beach is estimated at about$59,866.
Primary Market Area
In the Primary Market Area, those households that have incomes more than $75,000 also
comprise the largest proportion, or about 35.6 percent of the total. The second largest
category is the range from $50,000 to $74,999 or about 24.4 percent of the total. As
shown in Figure 3-1, about 15.4 percent of the total households in the primary trade area
earn less than $24,999. The overall median household income for the cities of Huntington
Beach, Fountain Valley and Westminster is estimated at about$59,687.
3.2 Household and Median Income Growth
Table 3-2 presents the projected growth in households for the Primary Market Area as well
as a comparison of median incomes within the Primary Market Area. Growth in
households is based on Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG 1996)
projections.
Household Growth and Distribution in Primary Market Area
For the primary trade area as a whole, total households from 1997 to 2010 are estimated
to increase by about 8.2 percent. The City of Westminster is projected to experience the
25
ATTACHMENT
N0. *Z 9
TABLE 3-1
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW SITE
1997 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AREA
Huntington Beach Primary Trade Area'
Income Range Total Percent Total Percent
Less than$24,999 10,708 15.2% 17,489 15.4%
$25,000-$34,999 6,015 8.5% 9,847 8.7%
$35,000-$49,999 11,075 15.7% 18,117 15.9%
$50,000-$74,999 17,068 24.2% 27,778 24.4%
$75,000 or more 25.723 36.4% 40,481 35.6%
Total 70,590 100.0% 113,713 100.0%
Median Household Income $59,866 $59,687
FIGURE 3-1
HOUSEHOLD INCOME DISTRIBUTION
PRIMARY TRADE AREA
50%
40% -
40,481
30%
27,778
20% 17,489 8;T17--
10% 9 847
0%
Less than$24,999 $35,000-$49,999 $75,000 or more
$25,000-$34,999 $50,000-$74,999
Income Category
Notes: 1. The primary trade area includes the cities of Huntington Beach, Fountain
Valley,Westminster and the unincorporated area of Bolsa Chica.
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
Southern California Association of Governments(SCAG)
Urban Decision Systems(UDS)
2s
ATTACHMENT NO. 930
TABLE 3-2
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
PRIMARY MARKET AREA HOUSEHOLD GROWTH: 1997-2010
7Percentage
Incremental 1997 2010 Growth 0
Number of Households
Huntington Beach 70,590 74,566 3,976 5.6%
Fountain Valley 17,551 18,292 741 4.2%
Westminster 25,572 27,718 2,146 8.4%
Unincorporated County Q 2.500 2.500 N/A
Total 113,713 123,076 9,363 8.2% -
Distribution of Households
Huntington Beach 62.1% 60.6% 42.5%
Fountain Valley 15.4% 14.9% 7.9%
Westminster 22.5% 22.5% 22.9%
Unincorporated County Q,Qfs 2.0% 26.7%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
ch Median Income' 59,866 63,876 $4,010
rea Median Income $59,687 $63,644 $3,957
Huntington Beach 59,866 63,876 4,010
Fountain Valley 65,377 69,757 4,379
Westminster 55,289 58,993 3,704
Unincorporated2 59,568 63,558 3,990
Notes: 1. The increase in income is derived by multiplying the 1996 median income by an estimated
real income increase of 0.5 percent per year.
2. For purposes of this analysis,median income for the unincorporated area of Bolsa Chica is
assumed to be the same as the City of Huntington Beach.
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
California Department of Finance,May 1997
Urban Decision Systems
Southern California Association of Governments(SCAG)
27
ATTACHMENT NO. �•3I
largest percentage increase at about 8.4 percent. Household percentage growth within the
City of Huntington Beach is projected to be about 5.6 percent and 4.2 percent in Fountain
Valley. The distribution of households within the Primary Market Area is projected to
remain about the same, with the greatest amount of household growth in Huntington
Beach, at almost 4,000 additional households.
Comparison of Median Incomes in Primary Market Area
The real median household income of the primary trade area is projected to increase from
an estimated $59,687 in 1997 to $63,644 in 2010. The increase in the income is derived
by multiplying the 1996 median income by an estimated real income increase of 0.5
percent per year. The median income for Huntington Beach is projected to increase from
$59,866 in 1997 to $63,876 in 2010. The highest median income within the Primary
Market Area is in Fountain Valley at $65,377 in 1997 and projected to reach $69,757 in
2010.
3.3 Purchasing Power Analysis
Table 3-3 shows the derivation of the retail purchasing power for the Primary Market Area
and the City of Huntington Beach for 1997 and 2010. Overall, it is estimated that about
38.3 percent of the median household income is spent on total retail purchases.
City of Huntington Beach
The retail purchasing power of the households in the City of Huntington Beach is projected
to increase from about$1.62 billion in 1997 to an estimated $1.82 billion in the year 2010.
The overall retail purchasing power per household is projected to increase from $22,929
in 1997 to about $24,465 in 2010.
Primary Market Area
For the Primary Market Area, the total retail purchasing power for 1997 is estimated at
about$2.6 billion. This purchasing power is projected to increase in the year 2010 to about
$3.0 billion. For 1997, the retail purchasing power per household is estimated at$22,860,
increasing to about $24,376 in the year 2010.
3.4 Retail Capture/Leakage Analysis
Table 3-4 shows the amount and distribution of total retail sales in 1995 for the City of
Huntington Beach, the Primary Market Area and for the County of Orange. As compared
to the Countywide retail expenditure patterns, the City of Huntington Beach tends to
capture a relatively greater percentage of total retail sales in the categories of food stores,
auto dealers and auto supplies, home furnishings and appliances and service stations.
Conversely, the retail categories of general merchandise stores and other retail stores
28
ATTACHMENT NO. �
TABLE 3-3
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
ESTIMATE OF PURCHASING POWER FOR 1997 AND 2010
(in Constant 1997 Dollars)
City of Huntington Beach Primary Market Areal
Explanation .19971 2010 19971 2010
1. Number of households' 70,590 74,566 113,713 123,076
2. Estimated median income $59,866 $63,876 $59,687 $63,644
3. %of median income spent on retail purchases 38.3% 38.3% 38.3% 38.3%
4. Retail purchasing power per household(2 x 4) $22,929 $24,465 $22,860 $24,376
5. Total retail purchasing power in 000s(1 x 4) $1,618,531 $1,824,221 $2,599,505 $3.000,048
Notes: 1. Estimation of future households for Huntington Beach and the Primary Market Area are based on
projections from SCAG 1996.
2. The Primary Market Area includes the cities of Huntington Beach,Fountain Valley,Westminster and the
unincorporated area of Bolsa Chica.
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
Southern California Association of Governments(SCAG 1996)
Urban Decision Systems(UDS)
29
ATTACHMENT NO. 9.�3
TABLE 3-4
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL RETAIL SALES FOR 1995
On thousands of constant 1997 dollars)
City of Huntington Beach Prima Trade Area Coun of Oran e
Amount Percent Amount Percent k7Tmmount Percent
Retail Category
Apparel stores $66,695 4.7% $129,285 4.5% $1,234.885 5.7%
General merchandise stores 127,593 9.1% 414,669 14.4% 2,860.017 13.2%
Drug storee 42,640 3.0% 78,500 2.7% 620,556 2.9%
Food stores' 289,046 20.6% 542,274 18.8% 3,729,737 17.3%
Packaged liquor stores 12,575 0.9% 18,390 0.6% 147,268 0.7%
Eating and drinking places 152,081 10.8% 273,128 9.5% 2,558,562 11.8%
Home Furnish.and appliances 100,393 7.1% 171,262 5.9% 1,115,128 5.2%
Bldg.material and farm impimts. 92,445 6.6% 137,339 4.8% 1.253,739 5.8%
w Auto dealers and auto supplies 246,747 17.6% 462.301 16.0% 3,104,207 14.4%
o Service stations 103.091 7.3% 208,688 7.2% 1,439.390 6.7%
Other retail stores 171- 43 12.2% 449,850 15.6% , .543 6.933 16.4%
Retail Stores Total $1,404,849 100.0% $2,885,687 100.0% $21,610,422 100.0%
Notes: 1. The primary trade area includes the cities of Huntington Beach,Fountain Valley,Westminster and the unincorporated area of Bolsa Chica.
2. Taxable retail sales for the categories of drug stores and food stores have been increased by factors of 1.55 and 3.08 respectively,
to estimate total retail sales.
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
California State Board of Equalization
M
Z
--i
Z
w
tend to capture relatively less when compared on a Countywide basis. Relative to the
County and the Primary Market Area, Huntington Beach tends to capture a relatively
smaller proportion, 31 to 37 percent, of general merchandise retail sales.
The Primary Market Area tends to capture a relatively greater percentage than the
Countywide retail expenditure patterns in the categories of food stores, general
merchandise stores, and auto dealers and auto supplies. The retail categories of apparel
stores, eating and drinking places and other retail stores tend to capture relatively less
when compared to the Countywide averages.
3.4.1 Estimated Retail Leakage/Capture for 1997
Estimates of retail leakage and capture are made for the Primary Market Area and the City
of Huntington Beach. A positive retail capture is defined for a particular geographic area
where estimated retail sales are greater than the estimated potential household retail
purchasing power; retail leakage is defined as the opposite, that is, which estimated retail
sales are less than the estimated potential household retail purchasing power.
Primary Market Area
Table 3-5 presents the estimated retail capture/(leakage) for 1997 in the Primary Market
Area when using the Countywide retail sales expenditure pattern as a proxy for household
retail sales distribution within the Primary Market Area. The total estimated purchasing
power is estimated at some $2.6 billion with an actual retail sales of about $2.9 billion.,
Overall, the Primary Market Area is experiencing about $286.2 million in net capture, or
actual retail sales above the projected household retail demand. This suggests additional
capture from visitors and tourists. Leakage is projected for the categories of apparel
stores, eating and drinking places and building materials and farm implements.
City of Huntington Beach
Table 3-6, presents the estimated retail capture/(leakage) in 1997 for the City of Huntington
Beach. The leakage results are opposite the findings for the Primary Market Area. As with
the Primary Market Area, the Countywide retail sales expenditure pattern has been used
as a proxy for sales distribution within the City. The total estimated purchasing power for
the City is estimated at $1.62 billion. It is estimated that the City is experiencing leakage
of about $213.7 million in retail sales. The leakage is estimated in all retail categories
except food stores, packaged liquor stores, home furnishings and appliances, and auto
dealers and auto supplies. The greatest leakage is in the categories of other retail stores,
general merchandise stores and eating and drinking places and apparel stores. These
leakage categories could be served by the retail uses proposed for the Crest View site
development.
31
ATTACHMENT NO.
TABLE 3-5
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
ESTIMATED 1997 RETAIL SALES CAPTURE/(LEAKAGE) FOR THE PRIMARY MARKET AREA
(In $1,000's of Constant 1997 Dollars)
Actual Retail Sales Retail Purchasing Power' Retail Capture/(Leakage)
_ Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Ratio
Retail Category
Apparel stores $129.285 4.5% $148.544 5.7% ($19,258) 0.87
General merchandise stores 414.669 14.4% 344,030 13.2% 70,639 1.21
Drug stores' 78,500 2.7% 74,646 2.9% 3,864 1.05
Food stores2 542,274 18.8% 448,648 17.3% 93,626 1.21
Packaged liquor stores 18.390 0.6% 17,715 0.7% 675 1.04
Eating and drinking places 273,128 9.5% 307,768 11.8% (34,640) 0.89
Home Furnish.and appliances 171.262 5.9% 134.138 5.2% 37,124 1.28
Bldg.material and farm Implmts. 137,339 4.8% 150,811 5.8% (13,472) . 0.91
Auto dealers and auto supplies 462,301 16.0% 373,403 14.4% 88,898 1.24
w Service stations 208,688 7.2% 173,143 6.7% 35,545 1.21
N Other retail stores 449,850 15.6% 426,658 1L4N
Retail Total $2,885,687 100.0% $2.599.505 100.0% $286.182 1.11
Notes: 1. Retail purchasing power for the Primary Market Area Is allocated based on Countywide distributions.
2. Taxable retail sales for the categories of drug stores and food stores have been increased by factors of 1.55 and 3.08 respectively,
to estimate total retail sales.
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
California State Board of Equalization
0
S
m
z
z
0
TABLE 3.6
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
ESTIMATED 1997 RETAIL SALES CAPTURE/(LEAKAGE) FOR HUNTINGTON BEACH
(in $1,000s of Constant 1997 Dollars)-
Actual Retail Sales Retail Purchasing Power Retail Ca ture/ eaka e
Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Ratio
Retail Store Category
Apparel stores $66,695 4.7% $92,488 5.7% ($25,793) 0.72
General merchandise stores 127,593 9.1% 214,203 13.2% (86,610) 0.60
Drug stores' 42,640 3.0% 46,477 2.9% (3,837) 0.92
Food stores' 289,046 20.6% 279,342 17.3% 9,704 1.03
Packaged liquor stores 12,575 0.9% 11,030 0.7% 1,546 1.14
Eating and drinking places 152.081 10.8% 191,626 11.8% (39,545) 0.79
Home Furnish.and appliances 100,393 7.1% 83,518 5.2% 16,875 1.20
Bldg.material and farm Implmts. 92,445 6.6% 93,900 6.8% (1,454) 0.98
w Auto dealers and auto supplies 246,747 17.6% 232,492 14.4% 14,255 1.06
Service stations 103,091 7.3% 107,804 6.7% (4,713) 0.96
Other retail stores 171,543 12.2% 265,651 16.4%
Retail Stores Total $1,404,849 100.0% $1,618,531 100.0% ($213,682) 0.87
Notes: 1. Retail purchasing power for the City of Huntington Beach is allocated based on Countywide distributions.
2. Taxable retail sales for the categories of drug stores and food stores have been Increased by factors of 1.55 and 3.08 respectively,
to estimate total retail sales.
> Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
California State Board of Equalization
Z
m
z
0
v •
3.4.2 Estimated Retail Leakage/Capture for 2010
Primary Market Area
Table 3-7 presents the potential retail capture or leakage for the Primary Market Area in
2010. This analysis assumes spending patterns over the period from 1997 to 2010 would
stay relatively the same. Also, the projected purchasing power is compared against 1996
actual sales. As shown, actual retail sales are estimated at about $2.9 billion and retail
purchasing power is projected at about $3.0 billion. Capture is estimated for the retail
categories of general merchandise stores, food stores, home furnishings and appliance,
auto dealers and auto supplies and service stations. The greatest leakage is projected in
the categories of eating and drinking places, other retail stores and apparel stores. With
relatively smaller leakage projected for drug stores..
City of Huntington Beach
Table 3-8 presents the estimated purchasing powerfor the City of Huntington Beach for
year 2010. As shown, the purchasing power for the City is projected at about $1.8 billion
with an actual retail sales of about$1.4 billion. Leakage in the City is estimated for all of
the retail categories except home furnishing and appliances and packaged liquor stores.
The greatest leakage is projected in the categories of other retail stores, general
merchandise stores, eating and drinking places and apparel. General merchandise is a
major retail category served by the proposed Wal-Mart center.
34
ATTACHMENT NO. 3�
TABLE 3-7
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
ESTIMATED 2010 RETAIL SALES CAPTURE/(LEAKAGE) FOR THE PRIMARY MARKET AREA
(In $1,000s of Constant 1997 Dollars) .
Actual Retail Sales Retail Purchasing Power' Retail Capture/(Leakage)
Amount Percent F Amount Percent Amount Ratio
Retail Category
Apparel stores $129.285 4.5% $171,432 5.7% ($42,147) ' 0.75
General merchandise stores 414,669 14.4% 397,039 13.2% 17,630 1.04
Drug'stores2 78,500 2.7% 86,148 2.9% (7,648) 0.91
Food storee 542,274 18.8% 517.777 17.3% .24,497 1.05
Packaged liquor stores 18,390 0.6% 20,444 0.7% (2,054), 0.90
Eating and'drinking places 273,128 9.5% 355,190 11.8% (82,062) 0.77
Home Furnish.and appliances 171,262 5.9% 164,807 5.2% 16,455 1.11
Bldg.material and farm implmts. 137,339 4.8% 174,049 5.8% (36,710) 0.79
Auto dealers and auto supplies 462,301 16.0% 430,939 14.4% 31,362 1.07
.Xa Service stations 208,688 7.2% 199,822 6.7% 8,866 1.04
Other retail stores 449,850 15.6% 492,400 16.4% (42,5501 Q,Q]
Retail Total $2,885,687 100.0% $3.000,048 100.0% ($114,361) 0.96
Notes: 1. Retail purchasing power for the Primary Market area Is allocated based on Countywide distributions.
2. Taxable retail sales for the categories of drug stores and food stores have been Increased by factors of 1.55 and 3.08 respectively,
to estimate total retail sales.
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
California State Board of Equalization
a
m
z
O
TABLE 3-8
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
ESTIMATED 2010 RETAIL SALES CAPTURE/(LEAKAGE) FOR HUNTINGTON BEACH
(In $1,000s of Constant.1997 Dollars)
Actual Retail Sales Retail Purchasing Power Retail Capture/(Leakage)
Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Ratio
Retail Category
Apparel stores $66,695 4.7% $104,242 5.7% ($37,547) 0.64
General merchandise stores 127,593 9.1% 241,425 13.2% (113,832) 0.53
Drug stores' 42.640 3.0% 52,384 2.9% (9,743) 0.81
Food stores2 289.046 20.6% 314.842 17.3% (25.796) 0.92
Packaged liquor stores 12,575 0.9% 12,431 0.7% 144 1.01
Eating and drinking places 152.081 10.8% 215,978 11.8% (63,898) 0.70
Home Furnish.and appliances 100,393 7.1% 94.132 5.2% 6,261 , 1.07
Bldg.material and farm implmts. 92,445 6.6% 105.833 5.8% (13,388) 0.87
Auto dealers and auto supplies 246,747 17.6% 262,038 14.4% (15,292) 0.94
w Service stations 103,091 7.3% 121.505 6.7% (18.413) 0.85
Other retail stores 171,543 J2.2% 299.411 J6.4% (127,868) 2,7
Retail Total $1,404,849 100.0% $1,824,221 100.0% ($419,372) 0.77
Notes: 1. Retail purchasing power for the City of Huntington Beach is allocated based on Countywide distributions.
2. Taxable retail sales for the categories of drug stores and food stores have been Increased by factors of 1.55 and 3.08 respectively,
to estimate total retail sales.
n
M
Z
Z
O
;a
CHAPTER 4
POTENTIAL RETAIL IMPACTS
Potential retail impacts of the proposed Crest View site development are presented for
existing conditions as of 1997 and for the year 2010. The focus of this analysis is on the
sales in the retail category of General Merchandise as it applies to the development of the
Wal-Mart. While this is the primary category of classification within the State Board of
Equalization's taxable retail sales data, it is recognized that Wal-Marts also sell products
that compete with specialty retail and apparel stores.
4.1 Sales Impacts With the Proposed Wal-Mart 1997
City of Huntington Beach
As shown in Table 4-1, for the City of Huntington Beach, existing sales in the category of
general merchandise are estimated at$127.6 million and retail demand for this category
is estimated at about $214.2 million. The corresponding retail leakage is estimated at
$86.6 million.
With the development of the Wal-Mart and estimated sales of$46.0 million, combined with
the existing sales in the general merchandise category of$127.6 million, total sales in this
category are estimated at $173.6 million, still about $40.6 million short of the projected,_
retail demand in this category of$214.2 million.
Because the estimated Wal-Mart retail sales represents only about 53 percent of the
estimated 1997 General Merchandise leakage of$86.8 million, it is assumed that most of
the retail sales will represent a net gain to the City. Even though there may be some retail
sales transfer taken from other local merchants, the potential to keep relatively more
households shopping in Huntington Beach could also act as an economic catalyst for other
economic growth in the nearby areas and along Beach Boulevard.
Primary Market Area
Existing sales in the category of general merchandise for the Primary Market Area are
estimated at $414.7 million and retail demand is estimated at $344.0 million. This
suggests that the overall retail opportunities in the larger Primary Market Area are able to
capture greater retail sales than there is estimated local household demand, by about
$70.6 million. It should be noted that this amount does not include potential expenditures
from the visitors and tourists to the area.
With the addition of the Wal-Mart, total general merchandise sales for the Primary Market
Area would increase to about$452.9 million, or about$108.8 million above the household
retail demand estimated for the area. This assumes that the net capture of retail sales by
the Wal-Mart for the Primary Market Area would be at the current ratio of 0.83.
37
ATTACHMENT NO. •��
TABLE 4-1
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
ESTIMATED GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES POTENTIAL COMPARED TO EXISTING SALES
WITH WAL-MART
(in$9,000s of constant 1997 dollars)
1997 2010
City of Primary City of Rimary
Huntington Beach Market Area Huntington Beach Market Area
General Merchandise
Without Wal-Mart
1. Existing Sales $127,593 $414.869 $127.593 $414.669
2. Projected Retail Demand $214,203 $344,030 $241,425 $397,039
3. Retail(Leakage)/Capture(1-2) ($86,610) $70,639 ($113,832) $17.630
4. Demand Divided by Sales(2/1) 1.68 0.83 1.89 0.96
With Wal-Mart
5. Estimated Wai-Mart Sales $46.000 $46.000 $46.000 $46,000
6. Existing Sales $127.593 $414.669 $127,593 $414,669
7. Existing Sales+Wai-Mart Sales(5+6) $173,593 $452,849 $173,593 $458,869
8. Projected Retail Demand $214,203 $344,030 $241,425 $397,039
9. Total Sales-Projected Retal Demand(7-8) ($40,610) $108.819 ($67,832) $61,830
10. Demand Divided by Sales(8m 1.23 0.76 1.39 0.87
Notes: 1. Because the estimated Wal-Mart retail sales represents only about 53 percent of the estimated General Merchandise
leakage In Huntington Beach,it is assumed that most of the sales wit represent a net gain to the City.Even though there may
be some sales taken from other local merchants,the potential to keep relatively more households shopping in Huntington
Beach could act as a catalyst for other economic growth in nearby areas.
In the Primary Market Area,it is assumed that the net capture of Wal-Mart retail sales w ould be at the current ratio of
0.83 in 1997 and 0.96 in 2010.
Source: Stanley R Hoffman Associates,Inc.
38
92 ATTACHMENT NO, T•l%
4.2 Sales Impacts With Proposed Wal-Mart for 2010
City of Huntington Beach
Table 4-1 also presents the potential impacts of the proposed Wal-Mart for the year 2010.
This assumes some household growth in the City as well as growth. in the median
household income. This is compared against existing and potential retail sales in the
market area. As shown, existing sales in the category of general merchandise are
estimated at $127.6 million and retail demand for this category is estimated at about
$241.4 million. The corresponding retail leakage for the category of general merchandise
is estimated at $113.8 million.
With the development of the Wal-Mart and estimated sales of$46.0 million, combined with
the existing sales in the general merchandise category of$127.6 million, total sales in this
category are estimated at$173.6 million, still short of the retail demand in this category by
about $67.8 million. Again, because of the relatively large projected leakage for 2010, it
is assumed that most of the Wal-Mart sales will represent a net gain to the City. This
suggests that the City could potentially absorb the development of another similar big box
retailer in the general merchandise category. Even with the Wal-Mart, the City of
Huntington Beach still shows sizeable leakage that may support another general
merchandise retailer.
Primary Market Area
In the Primary Market Area for the year 2010, existing sales are estimated at$414.7 million
and retail demand is estimated at$397.0 million, for a capture of about $17.6 million over
demand. This capture margin is somewhat less than the$70.6 million estimated for 1997
and represents a market area that is more in balance.
With the development of the proposed Wal-Mart and about 96 percent of its estimated
sales of$46.0 million added to the Primary Market Area sales of$414.7 million, total sales
in the general merchandise category are projected at $458.9 million. This assumes that
the projected 2010 ratio of 0.96, as shown in Table 4-1, will approximate the net capture
of Wal-Mart sales. This exceeds the Primary Market Area demand of$397.0 million by
about $61.8 million.
4.3 Competitive Centers
This section addresses the impacts of the proposed Wal-Mart in addition to other proposed
competitive retail centers in the larger market area. Table 4-2 presents an overview of
these centers. Within the City of Huntington Beach, there are an estimated 501,909
square feet of planned retail and restaurant uses. Of these projects, the Home Depot and
the retail planned for the Rancho View school site are deemed to be at least partially
competitive and comprise a total of 343,643 square feet.
39
ATTACHMENT NO. 7•��
TABLE 4-2
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
SUMMARY OF PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Allocated
Development Square Competitive
Project Type Feet Competitive Allocation Square Feet
rY rug ..- ''3j 'k . (. .a.._ fit'{ c ,.,.,- i;tc.•'.�ii': r; HK
ofs_un_ngton 3eac'�_ ..,•M.t �~
L,..
Waterfront Phases II-VI Retail 75,000 N 0.0% 0
Main Pier,Phase II Retail 39,766 N 0.0% 0
3rd Block West Retail 25,500 N 0.0% 0
Duke's Surf City Rest. Restaurant 18,000 N 0.0% 0
Total Non-competitive 158,266
Home Depot Retail 105,143 Y 5.0% 5,257
Retail 25.500 Y 5.0% 1.275
Rancho View Retail 108.500 . Y 50.0% 54,250
Retail 92,500 Y 50.0% 46,250
Retail 12,000 Y 50.0% 6.000
Subtotal Competitive 343,643 113,032
i•�'ryy-a' fi �M•.:.a.�•..\j,.`�t ..w�4••tixf�'•L,sr:. '�r v II"W';1,.'. aa'.�� ,.• ,:• ,' .- •.. .. ...,
,_.:.�s��''�:,.:.:�Yf3k�i. 3f ram...:: a•' �'I.��.°•.r',:�*'s; �041e1.�'� :i -.-_.._.;_^�- ._�.-:.:.,.��._._ s .'" ..: .
Westminster Wal-Mart Retail 134.740 Y 50.0% 67,370
Total Competitive 478.383 180.402
Estimated Sales per Square Foot' $319
Total Estimated Competitive Sales $57,548,286
Notes: 1. For this analysis,estimated sales per square foot for the competitive uses are assumed
to be similar to that of the future Wal-Mart.
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates, Inc.
City of Huntington Beach
40
ATTACHMENT N0.�,�G
Competitive impacts of the Home Depot are expected to be marginal since this retailer
focuses on selling mostly home improvement materials and equipment. An impact rating
of 5.0 percent of the square footage is allocated to this development. Other competitive
impacts include the retail development of the Rancho View site. While no specific retailer
has been identified for this site, it is estimated that 50.0 percent of the square footage
would be competitive with the Wal-Mart at the Crest View site.
Other competitive impacts include the proposed development of the Wal-Mart in the City
of Westminster at the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Trask Avenue,
immediately south of the Garden Grove Freeway. This Wal-Mart is about five miles from
the Huntington Beach location and is estimated to be about 134,740 square feet. It is
estimated that 50.0 percent of the square footage, or the equivalent of 67,370 square feet,
would be directly competitive with the Crest View location,
Overall, sales per square foot from these competitive retailers are estimated at $319 per
square foot, or similar to the proposed Crest View site. Assuming that there are 180,402
square feet that are competitive, total sales are estimated at about $57.55 million.
4.4 Sales Impacts With Wal-Mart and Other Competitive Centers for 1997
City of Huntington Beach
Table 4-3 presents the impacts of the Wal-Mart at the Crest View site along with the
competitive impacts of other future retailers in the area. While impacts are presented for,.
1997, this is a hypothetical analysis since actual development of the commercial sites
could occur over the next several years. The combined general merchandise sales of the
future Wal-Mart at Crest View, the existing sales and the sales from the competitors is
estimated at $231.1 million. Retail demand for the City in this category is estimated at
about$214.2 million. In the short-term, a net capture of about$16.9 million is estimated.
Primary Market Area . .
For the Primary Market Area, total sales are estimated at $518.2 million, some $174.2
million above the household demand for general merchandise goods in this area. This
suggests that the retail centers in the larger Primary Market Area, consisting of the cities
of Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Westminster and the unincorporated area of Bolsa
Chica, would have to draw sales from a larger area and/or from visitors and tourists into
the area.
4.5 Sales Impacts With Wal-Mart and Other Competitive Centers for 2010
City of Huntington Beach
In the year 2010, assuming no other changes occur in the retailing sector for general
merchandise, the combined general merchandise sales of the future Wal-Mart at Crest
41
ATTACHMENT NO. �
TABLE 4-3
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIBN RETAIL SITE
ESTIMATED GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES POTENTIAL COMPARED TO EXISTING SALES
WITH WAL-MART AND COMPET rIVERETAILERS
(in 1,OOOs of Constant 1997 Dollars)
1997 2010
City of Primary City of Primary
Huntington Beach Market Area Huntington Beach Market Area
Without Wal-Mart.
1. Existing Sales $127.593 $414,669 $127,593 $414,669
2. Projected Retail Demand $214,203 $344,030 $241,425 $397,039
3. Retail Capture/(Leakage)(1-2) ($86,610) $70,639 ($113,832) $17.630
4. Demand Divided by Sales(2/1) 1.68 0.83 1.89 0.96
With Wal-Mart d Competitive Retailers:
5. Estimated Wal-Mart Sales $46,000 $46,000 $46,000 $48,000
6. Estimated Competitive Sales $57,548 $57,548 $57,548 $57,648
7. Existing Sales $127.593 $414,669 $127,593 $414,669
8. Existing Sales+Corrpetitive Sales+ $231,141 $518,217 $231,141 $518,217
Wal-Mart Sales(5+6+7)
9. Projected Retail Demand $214,203 $344,030 $241,425 $397,039
10. Total Sales-Projected Retail Demand(8-9) $16,938 $174,188 ($10,284) $121,178
11. Demand Divided by Sales(918) 0.93 0.66 1.04 0.77
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
42
ATTACHMENT NO.�_
View, the existing sales and the estimated sales from the competitors of about $231.1
million will not quite meet the projected demand of the City of about $241.4 million.
Demand in the general merchandise category are estimated to exceed sales by about
$10.3 million.
Primary Market Area
For the Primary Market Area, the total sales are estimated at$518.2 million, about$121.2
million above the projected household demand for general merchandise goods in this area.
Again, this suggests that the general merchandise retailers in the Primary Market Area
need to draw from a larger market area.
43
ATTACHMENT NO.9.4
CHAPTER 5
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
6.1 Estimated Fiscal Impacts
This section presents an overview of the potential recurring revenues and costs that would
accrue to the City assuming development of the Crest View site. Fiscal impacts are
presented for short and long-term scenarios. The short-term scenario assumes that the
Wal-Mart at the Crest View site will develop and will not have immediate competition from
the future retailers. The long-term scenario assumes that the future retailers develop and
become competitive with the Wal-Mart at the Crest View site and therefore have an impact
on their net taxable sales.
As shown in Table 5-1, the net fiscal impact to the City of Huntington Beach for the short-
term is estimated at$443.4 thousand. This fiscal surplus is based on recurring revenues
of$504.2 thousand and recurring costs of about$60.9 thousand. The largest proportion
of revenues are from sales tax, estimated at$460.0 thousand and assume buildout of the
site.
The net fiscal impact to the City for the long-term is estimated to be a recurring surplus of
about $391.8 thousand. The fiscal surplus is based on recurring revenues of $452.6
thousand and recurring costs of about$60.9 thousand. The largest proportion of recurring
revenues are from sales tax, estimated at some $408.4 thousand. In the long-term,
analysis, sales tax revenues have been adjusted downward to assume the estimated
impacts of the future competitive retailers.
5.2 Recurring Revenues
Recurring revenues to the City of Huntington Beach from the development of the Crest
View retail site include property tax, sales tax, franchise fees and other miscellaneous
income sources.
Pro efy Tax. Revenues from this source are estimated assuming a valuation of$130
dollars per square foot for the retail uses and the property tax allocation that the City of
Huntington Beach currently receives, about 19.9 percent of the 1.0 percent basic levy.
Sales Tax. Sales tax revenues to the City of Huntington Beach are 1.0 percent of total
taxable sales. In the short-term, total sales from the Wal-Mart are estimated at $46.0
million. The $46.0 million is adjusted by a factor of 0.90 to account for non-taxable goods,
such as food for home consumption and prescription drugs. Net taxable sales for Wal-Mart
in the short-term are estimated at about $41.4 million. Additional taxable sales from the
other uses on the Crest View site are estimated at$4.6 million. Total center taxable sales
in the short-term are estimated at $46.0 million.
44
ATTACHMENT NO. �•�0
TABLE 5-1
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: CREST VIEW RETAIL SITE
GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACTS
(In Constant 1997 Dollars)
Short-term Long-term
Recurring Revenues
Property tax $41,048 $41,048
Sales tax 460,000 408,378
Franchise fees 2,524 2,524
Other revenues ma Wa
Total $504,233 $452,611
Recurring Costs
Police protection $27,853 $27,853
Fire protection 13,939 13,939
Public works 7,820 7,820
General government 11-242 11,2¢2
Total $60,854 $60,854
Net Recurring Surplus $443,379 $391,756
Revenue/Cost Ratio 829 •7.44
Notes: 1. The long-term impact assumes competition from future big box and
general merchandise retailers in the market area.
Source: Stanley R.Hoffman Associates,Inc.
45
ATTACHMENT NO. ��
In the long-term, the net taxable sales to the City of Huntington Beach are estimated to
decrease somewhat due to the development of competitive retailers. To account for this
decrease, potential sales from these retailers, estimated at about$57.55 million are added
to the $41.4 million of taxable sales from the Wal-Mart for total taxable sales of $98.9
million. This $98.9 million is then divided into the estimated current leakage of about$86.6
million. The ratio of current leakage to estimated competitive and Crest View sales is
about 87.5 percent. This 87.5 percent is then applied to the $41.4 million of taxable sales
at the Crest View Wal-Mart for estimated net taxable sales of$36.24 million. Additional
taxable sales from the other uses on the site are estimated at $4.6 million. Total net
taxable sales from the Crest View site are estimated at some $40.8 million.
Franchise Fees. Revenues from franchise fees are estimated at$7.84 per employee and
are based on analysis of the City of Huntington Beach 1996/97 Budget.
Other Revenues. Other revenues are estimated at $2.05 per employee.
6.3 Recurring Costs
Recurring costs to the City include police and fire protection services, public works and
general government services. These costs were estimated based on City budget analysis
and discussions with City staff.
Police Protection. Costs for police protection are estimated at$86.50 per employee. This
factor is derived by dividing the 1996/97 budget amount of$32.6 million by the existing
population of the City, about 188,516 for a per capita factor of$173.00. For this analysis,
police protection costs for an employee is assumed to be the equivalent of one-half of a
resident, or about $86.50 per employee.
Fire Protection. Similar to police protection, costs for fire protection services are estimated
at $43.29 per employee. This cost is based on the current 1996/97 budget amount of
$16.32 million and the current population of the City.
Public Works. Public works costs are based on an estimate of$564.60 per acre and about
13.85 acres of development. This is based on budget information provided by City staff
and includes the following components: Administration — $20.75 per acre; Engineering —
$27.26 per acre;Traffic, Street Signals and Lighting—$68.42 per acre; Street Maintenance
— $338.20 per acre; Sewers — $71.45 per acre; and Flood Control —$38.52 per acre.
General Government. Costs for general government functions are estimated at 26.9
percent of direct department costs. General government activities include Administrative
Services, City Attorney, City Council, City Clerk, Non-Departmental and City Treasurer.
46
ATTACHMENT NO.
h
ATTACHMENT NO. 10
Economic Development Section of Planning Commission Staff Report dated
August 11, 1998
F. Economic Develo ment
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-57 (Attachment No. 7) requesting the City
Administrator"to work toward the pursuit of commercial development opportunities on
large parcels adjacent to major arterial highways, including vacant/surplus school sites, or
any other vacant under utilized sites or parcels in the City of Huntington Beach." The
Resolution states that"a top priority of the City Council is to improve the City's revenue
base..." and "... in pursuit of this goal the City has analyzed commercial land
use opportunities to expand the City's retail sales tax, reduce retail sales tax leakage, and
improve its overall economic base...."
Fiscal Impact Analysis:
The City has required that a Fiscal Study be prepared for the project. The "Retail and
Fiscal Impact Analysis"was prepared by the Stanley Hoffman and Associates
(Attachment No. 9). The objectives of the study are to examine the short-term and long-
term fiscal impacts to the City of Huntington Beach associated with the commercial (big
box) retail use such as the Wal*Mart project and examine certain issues related to retail
sales tax leakage and potential impact to surrounding retailers. The Retail and Fiscal
Impact Analysis on the proposed commercial (big box)retail use such as the Wal*Mart
project conclusively determines that the proposed project will meet the objectives of
expanding the City's retail sales tax, reduce retail sales tax leakage and improve the
City's overall economic base. Based on the strength of policies in the Economic
Development Element of the General Plan and City Council Resolution No. 96-57 the
economic benefits of the proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse
environmental effects in the areas of land use compatibility and air quality that are
identified in the DEIR. The proposed project meets or exceeds all Zoning Ordinance
standards, with the exception of main driveway design, perimeter wall height, and
signage. The project is designed with amenities that distinguish it from a prototype
Wal*Mart and with proposed mitigation measures and City conditions of
approval, the potential adverse impacts (other than those addressed in the Statement of
Overriding Considerations) of the project have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
Economic Issues:
The proposal to change the land use and zoning designation on the Crest View School
site to commercial to permit commercial (big box) retail uses is in keeping with the
economic development objectives of the City. These objectives are outlined in a number
of documents and policies, but most importantly in the Economic Development Element
of the General Plan as described above. Reasons for considering this site for commercial
(big box)retail development include:
• There are a limited number of sites which lend themselves to the development of
market driven retail projects with revenue generating potential.
• The City is still working to make up more than $7 million a year in revenues taken by
the State of California and this is one of ten sites targeted for development to help
close this revenue gap.
• The City will gain substantial net new tax revenues from the project, with the Ocean
View School District benefiting from ground lease payments as well.
• A general merchandise retailer at this site will reduce the amount of retail sales
leakage to neighboring communities in the single largest leakage category.
• New jobs will be created to help improve the City's jobs/housing balance.
• A new retail activity node will be created on Beach Boulevard which is now littered
with functionally obsolete retail centers and sites.
The City of Huntington Beach is a substantially built-out community and is developed in
a manner which did not facilitate the type of diversified tax base needed today to provide
the level of services desired by our residents, businesses, and visitors. As such, there are
limited sites which can support additional "big box" general merchandise retailers and the
Crest View site is one of the few sites known to be suitable to these types of retailers and
available for development. Clearly,this specific type of large-scale retail project is
envisioned by the General Plan and other policy statements of the City Council, including
the Economic Development Strategy and Council Resolution No. 96-57.
The single largest source of revenue for the City is sales tax. The commercial land use
and zoning designation and project proposed for the Crest View site will generate
between $400,000 - $450,000 of sales tax annually. Property tax will also add
approximately $40,000 in revenue annually. Other revenues will accrue to the city as the
wages of the new employees on the site multiplies throughout the local economy.
Throughout the 1990's,the City has struggled with the impact on services of an annual
loss of more than$7 Million a year to the State of California. Ten development sites,
throughout the City, have been targeted for retail and commercial development in an
effort to make-up for this loss. Even if all ten of these sites are eventually developed as
contemplated, the City will still not make up this annual revenue loss to the State.
The commercial land use and zoning designation and future development will provide a
substantial increase in the City's shopping opportunities for both existing and future
residents and will especially help fill a missing niche of general merchandise retailers
within the City. General merchandise items typically carried by a"big box" include the
following: apparel and accessories, building materials and garden supplies, automotive
supplies and services, and furniture and home furnishings. Since we are part of a larger
urbanized area, the City of Huntington Beach is ringed with these types of retailers in
neighboring communities. Our residents shop in these other communities due to
convenience of location or brand loyalty. These factors can only be offset by
diversifying our own local retail mix.
This is evidenced by a statistical analysis of per capita sales tax for Huntington Beach as
compared to other areas of the county; our residents spend many of their shopping dollars
outside of our city. The term for this is"leakage". Leakage is the difference between the
total County's sales per capita for a particular taxable retail sales category and the City's
sales for that same category. In other words, leakage is the shopping done by Huntington
Beach residents outside the city. Our greatest categories of leakage are:
Retail Sales Leakage
Category Leakage
Percentage
General Merchandise 44%
Other Retail 34%
Apparel 24%
In total,this"leakage" is a minimum of$214 million of lost sales potential from
Huntington Beach or over$2 million in lost sales taxes per year.
One of the largest category which other cities benefit at our expense is general
merchandise, which is the main category of merchandise that a commercial (big box)
retail use such as a Wal*Mart sells.
Estimated General Merchandise Leakage
H.B. Residents Amount
General merchandise purchases within $214 Million
Coun
General merchandise purchases within H.B. $127 Million
Purchases made outside H.B. $87 Million
This illustrates that much of the demand by Huntington Beach residents for general
merchandise goods can only be satisfied by residents leaving the city to spend their
money. The addition of this site as a commercial (big box) retail development with a
proposed Wal*Mart will only eliminate an estimated $46
million of this leakage, leaving enough continuing general merchandise leakage to
support other retailers in the City.
Two other ways to consider the relative retail position of Huntington Beach are to look at
our total sales tax revenue and to comparative per capita sales among the local
communities. While local taxable sales have been growing lately, we are just now
returning to the level we were at in earlier years. The city's 1997/98 sales tax revenue is
estimated to be $19 million, the first time we will exceed our prior highpoint of$18.3
million from 1989/90. In constant 1997 dollars (i.e. adjusted for inflation), the City's
taxable retail sales declined over 20%between 1990 and 1995.
On a per capita basis, Huntington Beach sales taxes look much worse. In 1996,
Huntington Beach was 19th out the 31 Orange County cities in sales tax per capita, at
approximately $84.
Illustrative Per Capita Sales Tax
Amount Per
Local Cities Capita
Costa Mesa $230
Countywide average $123
Fountain Valley $136
Garden Grove $74
Newport Beach $171
Westminster $106
Huntington Beach $84
If Huntington Beach could expand its retail base even to the Countywide average of$123
per capita, it would mean an additional $7.2 million plus annually to fund services. We
are most certainly under-realizing our potential, especially if you compare our per capita
position on retail sales tax with our per capita income. Huntington Beach is a higher
income community at$34,711 per capita, or 15.5% above the countywide average. As
such, it is reasonable to assume that we could easily exceed the countywide average for
per capita sales tax.
On the employment side, a commercial (big box) retail use such as a typical Wal*Mart
has approximately 300 employees, and Wal*Mart states that they hire 80 % - 90% from
within a 10-mile radius of each store. Wal*Mart also states that they offer quality
compensation and benefits (including stock purchase plans)that are among the best in the
industry.
As envisioned by the General Plan,the project proposed for the Crest View site would
create a strong
retail node at the Beach/Talbert intersection. This intersection currently consists of
generally unanchored retail shopping on 3 corners, and unanchored retail is the most
vulnerable type relative to vacancy and lack of upkeep. The addition of a strong retail
anchor at this location will improve the immediate area and
the central portion of Beach Boulevard. The northern portion of Beach will be well
anchored at Edinger by the soon-to-be redeveloped Mall. The new Hilton Ocean Grand
Resort will anchor the southern portion. The Crest View project will be a welcome
addition to help create another activity node along the remainder of Beach Boulevard, in
addition to the Five Points node just to the south.
Some believe that the current economic expansion we are enjoying may last for 4-6 years
in California, while other economists point out that the rate of growth has already slowed
substantially. Whatever the timetable will be, we have all been reminded throughout the
1990's of the cyclical nature of our economy. The city's economic development related
policies and goals are to help grow our revenue and job base so as to help the city through
the next economic downturn.
Talbert-Beach Commercial Site
...::....:
.........:.:.::...:
• t
M14::•.v
Huntington Beaclz :
Planning Commission
August 11, 1998
Talbert-Beach
r
:
Achieves City Economic Development
Objectives:
— General Plan - Economic Development
Element
— Economic Development Strategy
— City Council Resolution No. 96-57
2
1
Talbert-B�a�clz
.........::::;::a:: i.
f
J% f �•'+{ f Yam•}, .f,.
f f"
:,"sfr+"• ..�f l.}:•r f "} f r f., }%lis r � /h /':. f:f..
_ /��` r� ::•� fir%'.:•
.}.::=:•}'�• � }fi/r:. ... rk'�n..: f�'�Vifiif +,%�%iif�'•'•'•f
./r rr•,?� : � f r• f'ff 3•,✓. f'
r f/ '' /:'': j f /r'� x:�a'!,/.•',/+�/f�fir,f f
�i :} ffYJf/ �• •r%}:frj''r.•.i:i::t.::t�i:.
�J.rff' f�l+ + f.;. +� J�•f� +ff•�
r / / •:/.•:r.;fYr/�••f:• /:f l.%rlr`.? �"r...
.....
":: 'rf �:j } ��' fyff.�:xy.•:::.x.::Y.i}:iif�}:.
�%JS.• rr: i� :f::r:Wfi
';�.�•/'r'� ,Y/�////fi, }{/:''{'•f:.f/+�f'}�:rrf'r' rf/+ '#fi':•;..::•:
rrrr f � r:•igxg �f.•++•+•.
•.'� �''f/,,.� ..fir
{frf
3
Commercial Development ai d
..: ::i •''iYf• Limited sites with revenue generating
potential.
• Help close $7 million annual revenue
loss.
• Schools gain $400,000 in new revenues.
4
2
Commercial Development ,,� ��+ •
• Reduces General Merchandise
Leakage.
• Creates new jobs.
• Provides new retail anchor for Beach
Blvd.
5
Why Commercial Develo
• Revenue
— Sales tax $400,000- $450,00/yr.
— Property tax $40,000/yr.
— Economic Multiplier.
6
3
Why Commercial Development?
�6sy
• Jobs
— Create 280+jobs.
— 80 - 90% from 10 mile radius.
— Improves jobs/housing balance.
— Quality compensation / benefits.
Sales Tax Perspective
;N
• 1997/98 Sales Tax Revenue $19 million
• 1989/90 Prior Highpoint $18.3 million
y. 41r
8
4
Leakage of Reta '
• Ranked 19th of 31 cities in 1996 for per
capita sales tax.
9
Sales Tax Pei
$250
$200 $171
$150
$84 $106
$100
$50
$0
C.M. County F.V. G.G. H.B. N.B. West.
10
5
Huntington Beach is a Net Lo er
- M
• Millions of Dollars Per Year
• $7 2 million using Countywide average
Y /
• $8 3 million adjusted for higher income
Retail Sales Leakc��e
rd€F
Largest Categories
General Merchandise 44%
Other Retail 34%
Apparel 24%
,2
6
Estimated General Merchandise
Leakage
s.
Purchases within County $214 nulhon
Purchases within City $127 million
Purchases outside City $87 million
13
General Merchandise L e
Annual Leakage $87 T.
Estimated Wal*Mart $46 Million
General Mer. Sales
Remaining General $41 Million
Merchandise Leakage
#q � �
mqv, `� l!�
14
Local Comet,'°
• 8 major discount stores within 5 miles
�!
• Total of approximately 1,110,500 sf.
• Only 2 in Huntington Beach.
15
Figure Discount Stores L°Q°°d
A Huntington Beach, Callomia (') -—me
V
QI
0 t 2
t
16
8
Local Com ' q'
• City shoppers have so many choices
outside of City already.
• Retailers have faced competition already.
• Conclusion of 1994 KMA Study that
majority of sales will be new to city.
,7
Other P '
• Help create node per General Plan.
• Provide strong retail anchor for area.
• Encourage upgrade of area retail.
18
9
Other Po
• Create spin-off shoppers for other re-ailers.
• Provide much-needed revenue for schools.
• Continue to send message that city is good
place to do business.
,9
Site Layout,,,-"', If�l
General Merchandise less intrusivey
alternatives
— Supermarket/Home Improvement stores
• More deliveries; noisier trucks
• Less City revenue
— Residential /Multi-Family alternative
• Traffic, congestion,noise
• High City service costs, low revenue
zo
10
Site Layout/y s
• City Encouraged General Merchanci
Retailer over Other Alternatives
— Highest revenue generator.
— Offsets leakage in largest categories.
2,
Wal*Mart Baer ,F
• Strength
— Nation's largest private employer--687,000.
— World's largest retailer--90 million daily
customers.
— 2,337 Wal*Marts; 444 Sam's clubs.
22
11
Wal*Mart Bac1
California:
• 95 Wal*Marts
• 25 Sam's Clubs
• 2 Distribution Centers
• 33,400 Associates
23
Wal*Mart Back
• Community Involvement
— Wal*Mart supports charities, education,
environment.
— 1996 - California gifts of$3.1 million.
24
12
Why at this Loll'... << �
t E .
• Wal*Mart selected this site from whole city.
• Their closest store is North 5 miles.
• City has very limited 13'acre options.
• Some Beach Blvd. visibility.
25
Why at this Lo , ?
' ihilri9l Yfl i i1
M4�i�dl9'�Ij�
J
1
• Planning staff recommends w/conditions.
• School District revenue source.
• Highest and best use of site .
• If not here, then probably outside of City.
26
13
kHz,
CRUST%new RETAIL SITE
o r:1
® .^
m
Site
/ / /
if
r �
commercial
Commercially • plan.
Provide focus • Beach
- Meet operational "
Site Layout/ Users
• Support cost of site development.
• Allow for future incorporation of Beach
Blvd. frontage.
, hd srq
r _zr
F r YJk
k IVII r od1�ficat Qos a `out
N
compromllseommercta qW
��tential
M'v
29
Executive Summary
• Recognize competing objectives
— Land-use compatibility versus economic
development.
— Wants of few versus needs of many.
— City often balances competing objectives.
30
15
Executive Su�r � l�
• Citywide benefits outweigh local impacts.
• Commercial development in best interest
of City.
31
��ud�it4V ICI' �� lI1t'ap H
r
32
16
a CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
InterOffice Communication
Economic Development Department
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: David C. Biggs, Director of Economic Development
DATE: September 3, 1998
SUBJECT: ECONOMIC ISSUES/QUESTIONS REGARDING CRESTVIEW
This memorandum is being provided to respond to the issues and questions raised by
Planning Commission Members in regard to the proposed commercial development on
the Crestview site.
Small Business Impacts/Opportunities
The Economic Development Department has had discussions with the Small Business
Development Center(SBDC) about developing a series of courses for existing small
business in regard to competing with, surviving, and taking advantage of, the introduction
of an additional "big box" retailer in the community. These courses are typically free to
the small business community, and this type of training has been used in other
communities. The SBDC is funded in part by the City and co-located with the Chamber
of Commerce.
Jobs/Hirine Practices
The City and Wal*Mart are committed to encouraging local hires.for the positions which
will result from this development. Attachment I is a letter from the Orange County
Private Industry Council regarding their willingness to assist in the hiring and training
process for this store with their efforts targeted to Huntington Beach residents. The PIC
also undertook this same effort when the new Wal*Mart opened in Westminster with its
350 jobs. The Private Industry Council provides placement and training activities
targeted towards the unemployed and under-employed. In addition, they are the main
service delivery agents for the Welfare to Work programs.
ATTACHMENT NO.
Employee Corn pensationBenefits
Attachment 2 is information from Wal*Mart regarding the range of benefits which they
provide and background on their compensation strategy.
School District Transaction/Benefits
The Ocean View School District has entered into two 65-year leases on this site.
Wal*Mart is leasing approximately 12 acres for an annual rental commencing at
$250,000. The remaining 1.8 acres have been leased to Arnel Development for the three
pad-sites at an annual rent commencing at $150,000 per year. There are inflationary
adjustments every five years for Arnel and every ten year for Wal*Mart with the gross
benefit to the OVSD expected to $39.2 million over the 65 year term of the lease.
It is also important to note that ground lease revenue has greater flexibility to OVSD for
educational programs and capital needs.
In addition, local schools will also receive property tax from a now tax exempt site. The
OVSD will receive an estimated $51,000 per year and the Huntington Beach Union High
School District will receive $42,000. However, these increases in local property tax
count against the State funding which the districts receive and as such do not result in any
substantial increased funding.
Residential Development Fiscal Scenarios
In order to provide a comparison to the property being developed as single family
residential, two illustrative residential scenarios have been prepared and are Attachment
3. The first shows that looking at property tax revenues only, the cost to provide services
to a residential development when compared to the revenues is a negative $16,258 per
year. The second illustration adds in other revenues such as the utility users tax, etc, and
this scenario shows that revenues exceed costs in a positive way by $24,926 per annum.
Ultimately, a higher density residential product type could be developed on the site.
While the impact of this scenario was not set forth on an illustrative basis, there would be
generally be less revenue generated with higher costs of service.
Citywide Retail Development Potential
In 1996, staff prepared a matrix of sites and areas which had commercial/retail
development potential. This matrix illustrated that we needed to develop all of these sites
in order to even come close to increasing our per-capita sales tax to the countywide
average of$123. This matrix is Attachment 4 and has been updated to provide a current
status report on the sites/areas listed. This
ATTACHMENT NO. =
Economic Benefit to City
Considerable focus has been placed on the economic benefits to the City from approving
commercial development on the Crestview site. A number of the questions raised by the
Commission were responded to immediately after the public hearing in a memorandum
dated August 17, 1998 (Attachment 5). This included an illustration regarding any
proposed revenue sharing based upon what the City did for the High School District on
the Home Depot site.
The probable economic benefits from development on this have been analyzed more than
most other sites in the City. This is due to the concerns regarding the development of this
site, more than the development of this specific use or combination of uses.
Economic Development staff believes that substantially all of the sales tax revenue
generated by this site will be net new sales tax to the City.
The rationale for our conclusion is outlined below:
1. Studies/Reviews done at different times by three outside economic firms;
Hoffman & Associates, The Sedway Group, and Keyser Marston Associates;
all indicate a net positive economic impact.
2. The level of sales tax leakage which Huntington Beach experiences is
substantial and especially high in the general merchandise area.
3. As illustrated in Attachment 6, the use of a range of net economic benefit, in
part, allows for the possible impacts of a"big box" retailer on existing stores.
This recognizes that:
• There will be some shift of sales from other businesses;
• There will be some improvement in sales of other businesses—for
example, auto dealers in the area are anticipating increases in sales
given the number of people attracted to the area by a new anchor
retailer;
• There will be some new businesses which choose to locate in the area
to take advantage of the spillover effect of a large anchor store.
4. Since Wal*Mart desires to enter the local marketplace, should the Huntington
Beach location not be available, it is highly likely a site will be secured in a
neighboring community. Should the store locate, for example in Fountain
Valley, our local businesses will still experience negative impacts, with the
City and community receiving very little to no benefit or upside.
ATTACHMENT NO. q•*tP
The net estimated economic impact after allowing for cost of services is $390,000 to
$440,000 (including property tax revenues)per year. This figure is before revenue
sharing, if any, with either the School District or Arnel. If you net out the illustrative
revenue sharing range of$80,000 to $90,000 per year outlined in the August 17th
memorandum (Attachment 5), the net range of economic benefit drops to $300,000 to
$360,000. The top end of this adjusted range is the same as the"best estimate" of sales
tax generation for this site as set forth in the 1996 matrix (Attachment 4). At this level,
City staff still believes that the revenues and benefits of the proposed development
outweigh the local impacts and costs.
dcb
xc: Mayor and City Council
Ray Silver, City Administrator
Melanie Fallon, Community Development Director
Attachments:
1. August 17, 1998 letter from Orange County Private Industry Council
2. August 31, 1998 letter from Wal*Mart
3. Crestview Site Illustrative Residential Scenarios I & I1
4. 1996 Matrix
5. August 17, 1998 Memorandum from Economic Development Director
6. Economic Benefit Estimate
Projects/school s/pOl doc
ATTACHMENT NO. �.
-W� A "Ir
^ ° 411
ZT -
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
InterOffice Communication
Economic Development Department
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: David C. Biggs, Director of Economic Development
DATE: August 17, 1998
SUBJECT: FOLLOW-UP TO QUESTIONS REGARDING CREST MEW
PUBLIC HEARING
During the course of the public hearing on the proposed commercial development on the
Crest View site at Talbert and Beach, questions were raised regarding any pending
requests by the School District and/or Arnel Development for revenue sharing from the
City. The purpose of this memorandum is to clarify the background and current status of
these requests.
The City has received requests from both the School District and Arnel Development for
some form of revenue sharing should the proposed commercial project be approved.
However, staff has held off on having any discussions on these requests until we know if
the project is approved. It was felt that any discussion in advance of project approval
would be inappropriate for a number of reasons, including fueling concerns by the
neighbors that a"deal" had already been cut. In addition, it is impossible to evaluate the
merits of the developer's request until all of the conditions of approval with a cost
attached are known.
The existence of these requests was shared with the Planning Commission during a study
session on June 23rd during which I presented an update on all pending economic
development projects and activities
In hindsight, it would have been more prudent to have couched the economic benefits of
the project in the terms of"not to exceed an estimated $400,000 to $450,000 in sales tax
revenue, subject to any revenue sharing agreements". However, the City will ultimately
receive the revenues with a future determination to be made as to how these revenues
might be spent.
ATTACHMENT NO. 4.1
Another important point to note is that the City will be receiving Traffic Impact Fees
from the Developer in order to make improvements to the road system. Under our
current policies regarding revenue sharing, we require that all fees be paid up-front by the
developer. As such, there is no direct relief from traffic impact fees. To the extent that
any revenue sharing is negotiated, it would involve the sharing of future sales tax
revenues from the General Fund and there would be no impact on the Traffic Impact Fee
fund.
Since there has been no agreement on any revenue sharing, it is very hard to estimate
what impact, if any, these future discussion might have on the net economic benefit. In
fact, using a number or range in a public setting may very well be counterproductive to
staffs efforts to negotiate the best possible deal for the City. However, we could use the
one existing revenue sharing deal with a school district involving a commercial project as
an indicator of scale. Furthermore, like with the High School District, the City would
hope to link any revenue sharing to recreational or facilities improvements on school sites
where there is joint use potential.
The High School District's formula was complicated in that it involved the move of an
existing retailer and the future replacement user at the former site, plus the advance of
funds for tennis court construction. In a best case scenario, the High School District
could receive 20% of the sales tax revenues generated by the project. If this upper end is
applied to the Crest View site, $80,000 to $90,000 of revenue sharing could result
annually.
While this may be useful background information, it should be reflected in the
preparation of any final form of the proposed Statement of Overriding Considerations.
We will be doing so in advance of the September 9th when the Planning Commission
takes up this matter again.
Please feel free to contact me if I can answer any questions or be of assistance in advance
of September 9`h
.
dcb
xc: Mayor and City Council
Ray Silver, City Administrator
Melanie Fallon, Community Development Director
Projects/schooWperevshr.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 4• t$ ��
Economic Benefit Estimate
ATTACHMENT #6�
Al ACHMENT NO. -A•t 9
ECONOMIC BENEFIT ESTIMATE
Low High
Revenues 1
Sales Tax $408,378 $460,000
Property Tax 41,048 41,048
Other Revenues 3,184 3,184
Total $452,611 $504,233
Service Costs 1 $ 60,854 $ 60,854
Net Economic Benefit After Service Costs $391,756 $443,379
Revenue Sharing Illustration 2 $80,000 to $90,000 $80,000 to $90,000
Final Economic Benefit Assuming $301,756 to $353,379 to
Revenue Sharing $311,756 $363,379
(1) Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, April 10, 1998
(2) August 17, 1998 Memorandum from Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENT N0. q .............
4
August 17, 1998 Letter from
Orange County Private Industry Council
ATTAC MENT # 1
ARACHMENT i4O
oanonnc:: on,000no
Oo 0, C.1,
/o.
G O
PRIVATE MUSTRy
CCUSCI L
o a
0 0
o a
o �
o �
CHAIR: August 17, 1998
Ruby Jane B. Yap, CPA
Yap & Little CPA, Inc.
VICE CHAIR: Mr. Jim Lamb
Jerry Dominguez City of Huntington Beach
Southern CA Edison
Project Manager
2000 Main Street
Frederick
A. Bra Huntington Beach, Ca 92648
Frederick A. Branca
Orange County
Social Services Agency Dear Mr. Lamb:
Bob Bunyaa
Mission Viejo Company The Orange County Private Council fully supports the City of Huntington
Robert A. Eck Beach in its efforts to locate a Wal*Mart at Beach and Talbert. A local, unified
Marksman Products recruitment effort will provide an economic boost to the city's low-income and
Jobn Geisbauer under employed population.
CA Department
of Rehabilitation The Orange County PIC commits to assist the City of Huntington Beach and
Bill Fogarty Wal*Mart in the recruitment, screening and hiring process through our One-
Orange County Stop delivery system. The Orange County PIC can also target our
Central Labor Council recruitment efforts towards Huntington Beach residents, though .our services
Bernice Hird are available to all Orange County residents.
Orange County
Community Foundation
The West Orange County Regional One-Stop Center was instrumental in
Donald McCrea assisting with the recent opening of Wal*Mart's Westminster store in March.
Decisioneering Over 2,000 applicants were processed for the 350 openings and during the
Jo Ann McGuire six weeks of recruitment. The center provided Wal*Mart with an on site
Employment Development Department facility, 'reception area interview rooms, ' +announcements phones faxes and
copy service for the eleven Wal*Mart employees on the recruitment team.
Raul Medrano
Hispanic Chamber
of Commerce We look forward to working with you and Wal*Mart on this exciting project. If
you have any questions regarding the Private Industry Council's participation,
Leland Oliver
Oliver Associates& please feel free to call me at(714) 567-7370.
Ernie Skelton hn
ere
Orange County +
Central Labor Council
David Sbiffman
Canon Business Machines rew urt Zcutive Director
Paul Snyder Orange County Private Indust Council
Coastline R.O.P. g ty Industry
Art Weaver
B.J. Fibres (/n,
�arEis��dlispe in aa�piseS Di Q Loeua>x�d 44A,v
1300 South Grand Avenue,Building B.3rd Floor,Santa Ana,California 92705 Phone: (714)567-7371 Fax: (714)834-7132
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
August 31, 1998 Letter from Wal*Mart
#2
AT.TA
ATTACHMENT NO. q•?
Crestview Site Illustrative Residential Scenarios I & II
ATTA, C MENT #3
ATTACHMENT NO. �•�D
08/31/1998 09:12 949-360--6290 C LIN PAGE 02
WAL*MART'
A�
August 31, 1998
Jim Lamb
Business Development
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street, Sth Floor
Huntington Beach,CA 92648
Dear Jim:
This letter is in response to your request for information about Wal-Mart benefits and
compensation:
• Benefits: Wal-Mart offers a comprehensive benefits package,including medical and dental
insurance,401(k),stock purchase and profit sharing plans.Further,by achieving specified
financial goals set by the company,associates may qualify for the company's stakeholder
bonus program,entitling them to receive a bonus check at the end of the fiscal year. Please
see attached list of benefits for detailed information.
• Compensation:As with other retailers,Wal-Mart does not release specific wage
information. However,we can tell you that Wal-Mart always provides compensation that is
market-based and competitive. These are not minimum-wage jobs. On the contrary,our
philosophy and policy is to be competitive in the local market, We seek the best people in
the retail industry and provide competitive pay and benefits in order to attract and keep those
individuals
Wal-Mart takes pride in the fact that it is the nation's largest private employer and that it is
frequently mentioned in polls and surveys as one of the best companies to work for. We believe
in providing quality jobs with comprehensive benefits. And we believe in taking care of our
people because we know it is our people who make the difference. They are the key ingredient
to our success. Further,we believe in developing our associates, such that they can grow with
the company. In fact, 60 percent of our management started in the ranks of hourly associates.
I hope I have provided you with the information you need. Please feel free to call me should you
have any more questions. I may be reached at(949)360-7860.
Sincerely,
Cynthia Lin
Director of Community Affairs
West Region
West Region
27470 Alicia.Parkway • Laguna Niguel,CA 92677 • 'Telephone(714)360-78W •Fax(714)360-0914
ATTACHMENT i 10 `�• �
08/31f15y8 0y: 12 9413-360--6290 C LIN PAGE 04
Val-Mart Associate Benefits Package
Full-time A soebtcs
A full-time associate is one who regularly works at least 28 hours per week. Eligible
full-time associates receive the following benefits:
• Medical Insurance
• Dental Insurance
• Company Paid Life Insurance
• Optional Life Insurance
• Dependent Life Insurance
• Accidental Death and Dismemberment Insurance
• Short/Long Term Disability
Profit Sharing(Must work a minimum of 1,000 hours per year)
• 401 K(Must work a minimum of 1,000 hours per year)
• Stock Purchase
• Vacation Pay
• Personal Time
• Jury Duty Pay
• Holiday Pay(for hourly Associates)after 90 day-,employment
• Associate Discount for Wal-Mart Associates. Associate Membership for
Sam's Partners
• Bereavement Leave
• Medical Leave
• Military Leave
• Personal Leave
• Scholarship Programs
• Resources for Living(Personal Counseling)
Peak Time AsIgociates
A peak time associate is one who regularly works less than 28 hours per week. Eligible
peak time associates receive the following benefits:
• Associate Only Medical Insurancc(after 2 years of employment)
• 401K(Must work a minimum of 1,000 hours per year)
• Vacation(after 2 years of employment)
• Stock Purchase
• Associate Discount for Wal-Mart Associates. (Associate Membership for
Sam's Partners)
• Holiday Pay
• Jury Duty Pay
• Bereavement Leave of Absence
• Medical Leave of Absence
• Military Leave of Absence
• Personal Leave of Absence
• Scholarship Programs
• Resources for Living(Private Counseling Services)
ATTACHMENT NO. 1-•
Crestview Site
Illustrative Residential Scenario I
Overall acreage/avg. 6,000 sf lots; 72 units
Less streets and parkland
Dedication(1.25 acres)
Estimated Average Sales Price $ 280,000
Estimated Total Assessed Value $20,160,000
City Property Tax Revenue $ 40,118
Revenue (19.9% including PERS Overide)
Estimated Total Cost of Service $ 56,376
($783.00 per unit/yr.)
Net Fiscal Impact < - 16,258 >
G:DavidUllus.doc ATTACHMEN T NO. 4.11
Crestview Site
Illustrative Residential Scenario II
Overall acreage/avg. 6,000 sf lots; 72 units
Less streets and parkland
Dedication(1.25 acres)
Estimated Average Sales Price $ 280,000
Estimated Total Assessed Value $20,160,000
City Revenues
Property Tax Revenue $ 40,118
Revenue (19.9%including PERS Overide)
Other Revenues $ 41,184
Utility Users Tax; Motor Vehicle In-Lieu; Franchise
Fees; Paramedic Fee; Fires&Forfeitures;
Miscellaneous ($572.00 per unit/yr)
Total City Revenue $ 81,302
Estimated Total Cost of Service 56,376
($783.00 per unit/yr.)
Net Fiscal Impact $ 24,926
G:DavidUllus.doc ATTACHMENT NO. -A-0-
1996 Matrix
ATT�A.�CHME�NIT :#4
ATTACHMENT NO. 4• 1 3
Sales Tax Analysis
Gross Sales Per Square Foot
Potential Retail Location Gross Site Retail Area in Minimum Sales Maximum Sales
Acres Square Feet $ 100.00 $ 250.00
1 Huntington Center 57 744,876 $ 74,487,600.00 $ 186,219,000.00
2 Goldenwest College(Edinger Frontage) 10 130,680 $ 13,068,000.00 $ 32,670,000.00
3 Former Home Depot 8 100,000 $ 10,000,000.00 $ 25,000,000.00
4 Beach Blvd(Westminster-PCH) 75 N/A N/A N/A
5 Rancho View School 13 169,884 $ 16,988,400.00 $ 42,471,000.00
6 Crest View School 13 169,884 $ 16,988,400.00 $ 42,471,000.00
7 Waterfront(3/ac.retail) 45 39,204 $ 3,920,400.00 $ 9,801,000.00
8 Morgan Stanley(PCH-First, 10/ac.retail) 31 130,680 $ 13,068,000.00 $ 32,670,000.00
9 Downtown 15 196,020 $ 19,602,000.00 $ 49,005,000.00
9a Third Block West 2 30,000 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 7,500,000.00
10 PCH(Bolsa Chica Bluffs-downtown) 7 91,476 $ 9,147,600.00 $ 22,869,000.00
10a Cal Resources(PCH-Goldenwest) 10 217,800 $ 21,780,000.00 $ 54,450,000.00
11 Peters Landing 8 104,544 $ 10,454,400.00 $ 26,136,000.00
12 Sea Cliff Village Expanded Site 53 692,604 $ 69,260,400.00 $ 173,151,000.00
13 Wintersburg School(New Home Depot) 10 130,680 $ 13,068,000.00 $ 32,670,000.00
Total 357 2,948,332 $ 294,833,200.00 $ 737,083,000.00
n
R:
m
z
--I
z
O ,
h:Salstax
Hennessey
�' 9/6/96
Sales Tax Analysis
Sales Tax Revenue to City Se t, eR mber, 1998
Potential Retail Location Minimum Maximum Best Estimate Current Status
$ 100.00 $ 250.00
1 Huntington Center $ 744,876.00 $ 1,862,190.00 $ 1,862,190.00 Negotiating Redevelopment
2 Goldenwest College(Edinger Frontage) $ 130,680.00 $ 326,700.00 $ 326,700.00 No Current Plans
3 Former Home Depot $ 100,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 200,000.00 Expo Design Center
4 Beach Blvd(Westminster-PCH) N/A N/A N/A Planning Visioning in Winter
5 Rancho View School $ 169,884.00 $ 424,710.00 $ 300,000.00 School neg.w/home imp.
6 Crest View School $ 169,884.00 $ 424,710.00 $ 360,000.00 Wal•Mart seeking approvals
7 Waterfront(3/ac.retail) $ 39,204.00 $ 98,010.00 $ 40,000.00 Est Start of 1999
8 Morgan Stanley(PCH-First, 10/ac.retail) $ 130,680.00 $ 326,700.00 $ 250,000.00 Owners CPH evaluating
9 Downtown $ 196,020.00 $ 490,050.00 $ 300,000.00 104/105 in neg.
9a Third Block West $ 30,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Est comp.Spring 99
10 PCH(Bolsa Chica Bluffs-downtown) N/A N/A N/A Most rezoned res.
10a Cal Resources(PCH-Goldenwest) N/A N/A N/A Long-term potential
11 Peter's Landing $ 104,544.00 $ 261,360.00 $ 200,000.00 Limited devel.potential
12 Sea Cliff Village Expanded Site $ 692,604.00 $ 1,731,510.00 $ 1,000,000.00 Est start fall 98
13 Wintersburg School(New Home Depot) $ 130,680.00 $ 326,700.00 $ 440,000.00 Proj.completed
Total Potential Revenue $ 2,948,332.00 $ 7,370,830.00 $ 5,338,890.00
' 1996 Revenue Adjusted
For Current Sales Tax $ 15,130,000.00 $ 15,130,000.00 $ 15,130,000.00
Total Estimated Revenue $ 18,078,332.00 $ 22,500,830.00 $ 20,468,890.00
Estimated Tax Revenue Per Capita $ 95.15 $ 118.43 $ 107.73
'—i
D *This figure reflects the projected 1996 sales tax adjusted for the existing tax revenue from the following sites:
0
= Huntington Center $ 750,000.00
Former Home Depot Center $ 385,000.00
M Peter's Landing $ 145,000.00
Zi Sea Cliff Village Expanded S $ 50,000.00
` Downtown $ 240,000.00
z
0
h:Salstax
Hennessey
l A 9/6/96
v1
August 17, 1998 Memorandum from
Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENT #5
A17ACHME N I NO.t-I4
T A C ME-"' ,
N-- 'T
zt 1
4
s w 3-
b
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Inter-Office Communication 01�
Economic Development Department
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: David C. Biggs, Director of Economic Development
DATE: October 6, 1998
SUBJECT: Crest Kew—Questions and Issues
This memorandum supplements my memorandum and attachments to you dated
September 3, 1998.
1. Three-Year Fiscal Analv is f Residential Alternative:
The illustrative Residential Development Scenario included in my memo of
September 3rd assumed buildout of the project and estimated the annual ongoing
expenses versus annual ongoing revenues after completion of the project. The
ongoing revenues and ongoing expenses would ramp up over three years given the
phased nature of residential development. Not doing a more precise year-by-year
analysis leading up to buildout may overstate the economic benefits of residential
when compared to a single-phase commercial development. However, not
significantly. More importantly, a three-year analysis would have also included one-
time revenues such as impact fees that provide benefit to the City. While these one-
time fees would also be paid in phases, Attachment No. 1 is an estimate by impact fee
for the residential alternative.
2. Sales tax Leakage:Estimate portion Captured from Westminster:
As discussed more fully in my memo to the Planning Commission dated September
3rd, studies by three separate consultants all indicate a net positive economic impact to
Huntington Beach from the proposed Wal*Mart project. One primary reason for this
is that Huntington Beach experiences a well-documented, large sales tax leakage,
especially in the General Merchandise category. General Merchandise is the category
most represented by Wal*Marts, K-Marts and Targets.
We asked the Sedway Group for an estimate of the level of sales that would come to
the proposed Huntington Beach Wal*Mart from the existing Westminster general
merchandise stores. The Sedway Group is one of two independent economic and
market analysis firms used by the City to provide advice on projects. Sedway has
estimated that approximately $23 million/year or 50% of the proposed Wal*Mart
sales will be diverted from existing general merchandise stores in Westminster
(Attachment No. 2)
3. LMUact gf new Wal*Mart on Residential ValucJ2WpaM Tax Revenue:
We have reviewed some written materials from the Appraisal Institute and discussed
this issue with a number of our consultants. It is their belief that it would be very
difficult at best to accurately forecast the level of impact of the proposed new store on
local housing prices due to the large number of factors which influence housing
prices. For example, the housing prices will be effected differently with different
mitigation measures and those are still being determined. Also, some point out that
houses near school sites may already have their valuation adjusted downward due to
extra vehicular congestion and other impacts associated with the school and concerns
of non-neighbor elements using the grounds during non-school hours. In addition,
there would have already been some impact given the fact the school is closed and is
an attractive nuisance with visible deferred maintenance.
Relative to impacts on property taxes, the reality is that Huntington Beach receives
only approximately 20% of 1% of the value of real property in property tax. If, for
example as some members of the public have suggested, entire residential areas
declined 20% in value (a scenario that staff does not believe to be the case), the City's
property tax may only decline $20,000/year. This amount would be more than offset
by increases in sales/property taxes from the project.
4. Alternatives DaWkgment.Scenarios:
A. Low Density Residential: This is the scenario presented in my September 3`d
memo.
B. One-Half Residential / One-Half Park (6 acre): Working from the
aforementioned September P Residential Scenario #2, but looking at 50% of the
residential units, the City would have one-time costs ranging from $750,000 -
$900,000 for the development of the Park and ongoing park maintenance
expenses of approximately $27,000 additional. Revenues from the site would be
reduced by 50%, with this development scenario having a net annual cost to the
City of$14,500 above revenues (Attachment No. 3).
C. Flip Wal*Mart building to the Western most part of the site: The Sedway Group
has looked at this issue on more than one occasion and their comments are
included in Attachment No. 2. This office agrees with Sedway's comments and
thinks the least desirable aspect of re-orienting the building to the west is the
elimination of potential expansion of the project to Beach Boulevard should such
sites become available in the future.
D. No project: From an economic development viewpoint, this does not seem to be a
realistic option. The School District has indicated that it needs to convert this
excess real estate into a revenue-generating asset. The City clearly achieves more
revenue if this site is developed as a large, retail sales tax generating use such as
Wal*Mart. If the City does not approve this Wal*Mart, in our opinion, the site
will be developed as residential, probably a multi-family product to meet the
desires of the School District to lease, not sell, their land.
As to the question of other sites for a Wal*Mart in Huntington Beach, it should be
clear by now that there are none acceptable to the retailer. Over six years have been
invested by Wal*Mart on this site, and they surely would have chosen another site by
now if it were available and met their site selection criteria.
S. Viability of Retail Pads:
Economic Development staff had previously formed its opinion regarding the pad
buildings and has now also reviewed the response by Arnel. In our opinion, these
pads should be viable, given the construction of a workable retail project. Non-
anchor tenants routinely rely upon the drawing power of anchor tenants to bring
shoppers to a center and Wal*Mart is a well-known anchor tenant. Because of
Wal*Mart's retail strength and use of advertising to promote its stores, other tenants
want to be close to benefit from its customers. In our dealings with retailers and retail
brokers, numerous inquiries have been fielded relative to these pads and all
indications reveal that the pads should lease-up quickly.
Relative to Arnel's comments, they seem to be saying also that there is market
interest in these pads based on their leasing meetings with prospective tenants and
that Arnel feels the pads are viable because of the viability of the big-box retailer.
We agree.
It should be noted that elimination of the pads would result in a reduction of both
sales tax and property tax revenues to the City of approximately $46,000 and
$3,800/year, respectively. From the School District's perspective, the revenue loss
would be much more significant in that the ground lease for the pad sites will
generate $150,000 of the $400,000/year of ground lease rent generated by the site.
Rm:retai1:wmpc9299
Development Related Fees
ATTACHMENT # 1
Attachment No. 1
Development Related Fees
These fees are estimates based on an assumed project of 72 single family residents and are shown
for illustrative purposes only as the fees offset development related processing services, capital
facilities and infrastructure impacts.
Library Community Enrichment/Development Fees $ 50,400
($0.40/sf for 72 units at 1,750 sf/unit)
Traffic Impact Fees $ 64,800
(12 trips/unit for 72 units at $75/trip)
City Sewer Fee $ 10,800
($150/unit)
County Sewer Fee-City Share $ 8,500
(5% of$2,360/unit)
Water Capital Facilities Fee $ 172,800
($2,400/unit)
Water Connection Fee $ 4,300
($60/unit)
In Lieu Park Fee $ 446,000
(5 acres/1,000 residents at $516,000/acre for 173 residents)
Total One-Time Development Fees $
Jim/retai1/w1mt1078
The seaway Group Analysis
ATTACHMENT #2 ............
SEDWAY GROUP
Real Estate and Urban Economics San Francisco
Los Angeles
MEMORANDUM Principals:
Alan C. Billingsley, CRE
Carol A. Fredholm
Amy L. Herman, AICP
TO: David Biggs Kathryn Welch Howe
Terry R. Margerum
Elizabeth A. Puccinelli
FROM: Alan Billingsley Roy J. Schneiderman
Lynn M. Sedway, CRE
DATE: September 23, 1998 Naomi E. Porat, Project Advisor
SUBJECT: Response to Questions Posed by Commissioner Kerins Regarding Wal-Mart
Application
As requested,I have examined issues raised by Commissioner Kerins regarding the pending Wal-Mart
application, as follows:
• Projected sales capture by Wal-Mart from competitive Westminster value-oriented general
merchandise stores,Target, KMart,and Wal-Mart stores,and resultant revenue to the City of
Huntington Beach.
• Fiscal impact of flipping the Wal-Mart to the west side of the site.
• Fiscal viability of the retail pads.
Projected Sales Capture
Sedway Group estimates that approximately one-half of the proposed Wal-Mart sales will be derived
from current sales at Westminster's Wal-Mart, KMart, and Target stores. This equates to about$23
million in sales annually,' or about $230,000 in sales tax revenue which would be diverted from
Westminster annually.
Fiscal Impact of Flipping Wal-Mart
Assuming that Wal-Mart accepts a location on the western end of the site,and assuming strong signage,
this siting change is unlikely to have a substantial impact on fiscal revenues generated by the store.
However,this siting would have a substantial impact on the feasibility of the pads,due to their reduced
visibility and distance from Beach Boulevard. In addition, the project could be jeopardized through
diminished income from the pad sites, due to their inferior location. Developers typically make their
economics feasible,given relatively low rents paid by major anchors,through relatively high rents from
small retailers on pads.
' Assumes $46 million in annual sales at proposed Wal-Mart.
1
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1150 1 San Francisco, CA 94111 1415.781.8900 1 Fax 415.781.8118 1 sedway@sedway.com
SEDWAY GROUP
Real Estate and Urban Economics
Fiscal Viability of Retail Pads
Assuming three retail tenants on pads averaging 3,500 square feet each, Sedway Group forecasts
revenue of$42,000 annually in sales tax and$6,300 annually in property tax to the City of Huntington
Beach.This projection assumes sales volume averaging$400 per square foot and property value of$300
per square foot.'The school district,other districts,and county would derive additional fiscal revenue.
I hope that this information helps to answer some of the questions regarding this important project to
the City of Huntington Beach
Z:\SF—BOXES\NORMA—M\WPDOCS\PROIECTS\03696\Biggs Memo 923.wpd
2 Assumes Huntington Beach receives 1%sales tax and 0.199% property tax.
2
One-Half Residential/One-Half Park Site
Attachment No. 3
On Half Residential /One-Half Park Residential Site
Residential
Overall acreage/avg. 6,000 sf lots; 36 units
Less streets and parkland
Dedication(1.25 acres)
Estimated Average Sales Price $ 280,000
Estimated Total Assessed Value $ 10,080,000
City Revenues
Property Tax Revenue $ 20,059
Revenue (19.9% including PERS Overide)
Other Revenues $ 20,592
Utility Users Tax;Motor Vehicle In-Lieu; Franchise
Fees; Paramedic Fee; Fires & Forfeitures;
Miscellaneous ($572.00 per unit/yr)
Total City Revenue $ 40,651
Estimated Total Cost of Service $ {28,188}
($783.00 per unit/yr.)
Net Fiscal Impact $ 12,463
Park
Estimated Cost to Develop $ 750,000—
($125,000 - $150,000/acre) $ 900,000
Estimated Cost to Maintain $ {27,000}/year
($4,500/acre/year)
TOTAL:
(One-Time Expense) $ 750,000—
$ 900,000
(Net Fiscal Impact) $ {14,537}year
(david:illusl.doc)
H� T' 15
CREST VIEW SCHOOL SITE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 97-1
MITIGATION MEASURES
October 27, 1998
The following mitigation measures are included in Final Environmental Impact Report
No. 97-1:
TRAFFIC
Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy:
T-1 The applicant shall construct a traffic signal at Talbert Avenue and the main project
driveway.
T-2 The applicant shall install a protected left-turn signal at the Newland Street/Talbert
Avenue intersection.
T-3(New) The applicant shall contribute a fair-share payment to the City of Fountain Valley to
mitigate the deficiency described at the intersection of Talbert Avenue and Bushard
Street based on the vehicle trips added to the intersection as predicted in the Traffic
Impact Assessment.
T-4(New) The applicant shall contribute a fair-share payment to the City of Huntington Beach to
mitigate the deficiency described at the intersection of Beach Boulevard and Slater
Avenue based on the vehicle trips added to the intersection as predicted in the Traffic
Impact Assessment.
NOISE
The following mitigation measures are recommended to reduce project-related impacts with regard to
noise:
N-1 Store deliveries shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.
N-2 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, an acoustical analysis shall be prepared to
determine design level mitigation required for noise generated by on-site activities,
including truck deliveries and loading dock operations. The study shall determine the
precise height of a noise wall system required along the east and south property
boundaries to successfully shield adjacent residential uses. (Based on the noise
analysis conducted for this EIR, an approximate 12-foot high wall will be required
along the entire east property and a portion of the south boundary, and an approximate
ten-foot high wall will be required along the balance of the south property boundary).
This study shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Community Development
Department prior to the issuance of grading permits.
ATTACH ENT N0. ?•�._.
N-3 Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, an appropriate noise wall system (pursuant
to Mitigation Measure N-2) shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
RECREATION
The following measure is recommended to mitigate the loss of open space/parkland associated with the
proposed project:
Prior to the issuance of building permits:
R-1 Construction of access to Lambert Park from Newland Street shall be required. A
switchback ramp is anticipated to be required and shall be provided pursuant to the
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
R-2 A Phase I archaeological study, including a literature search, records search, field
visit, and report outlining constraints or lack of constraints, shall be completed prior to
construction of the access improvements. In the event that constraints are identified, an
archaeological monitor shall be present during the construction of access improvements.
The archaeologist shall have the authority to stop construction activities in the event
archaeological resources are uncovered during grading until inspection, evaluation, and
recovery activities are completed.
R-3 The City shall develop a phased, long-term agreement with OVSD to mitigate the loss
of recreational facilities at both the Crest View School site and the Rancho View School
site, which is also anticipated to be developed with commercial uses. The agreement is
anticipated to incorporate the following:
Phase 1 — Upon development of the Crest View School site, facilities at Lake View
School should be improved to accommodate the youth soccer and youth softball
activities previously accommodated at Crest View. This will require the relocation of
two softball backstops and the installation of one soccer field at Lake View.
Phase 2 - Upon development of the Rancho View School site, the Lake View School
site facilities should be reconfigured to accommodate two skinned infield baseball
diamonds (for the OV Little League). The softball and soccer field at Lake View
School will then need to be relocated to the Park View School/Murdy Park site.
ATTACH MIE 1T N0. 2 �-.
z ,
ran IrvinE' 10002
CEQA STATEMENT OF FINDINGS AND FACTS
CREST VIEW SCHOOL SITE
ENVIRONMENTAL Il"ACT REPORT
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED.
IF THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED,
FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO SAID EFFECTS,
AND STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT THEREOF,
ALL WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED CERTIFICATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
CREST VIEW SCHOOL SITE PROJECT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA
I. BACKGROUND
This document has been prepared to explain the rationale that the City of Huntington
Beach has used in making particular findings of the effects created by the project.
Facts to support the findings are explained for less than significant effects, effects
mitigated to a level of less than significant, and unavoidable significant environmental
effects, in this order. This document concludes with a discussion of the alternatives
considered and the rationale for rejection of the alternatives.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 15091 of the State
CEQA Guidelines promulgated pursuant thereto provide:
"No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR
has been .completed which identifies one or more significant
environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one
or more written findings for each of those significant effects
accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding."
The possible findings are:
Finding (1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Final EIR.
Finding (2) - Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
of another pubic agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have
been adopted by other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency.
ATTACHMENT NO. 1.1_
vaiuoiUs 21:Ll p 949 tss iUUZ PCR Irvine Q 003
Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of
the Guidelines).
The findings shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record.
The finding shall not be made if the agency making the finding has concurrent
jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible mitigation measures or
alternatives.
The document is organized into three sections. This section, Background, identifies the
possible findings that may be made. This section also provides a discussion of the
planning and environmental review process for the project. The second section,
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings for the Significant Environmental Effects of
the Project, provides a summary of the impacts determined to be less than significant,
the impacts mitigated to a level of less than significant, and the unavoidable adverse
impacts. The third section, Project Alternatives, describes the alternatives to the
proposed project and provides the rationale for the rejection of the alternatives.
The City of Huntington Beach is considering approval of the Crest View School Site
project. Because the proposed actions constitute a project under the CEQA Guidelines,
and the project may have a significant effect on the environment, and the project is not
exempt; the City has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). This EIR has
identified certain significant effects which may occur as a result of the project, or on a
cumulative basis in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable
future projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
The City of Huntington Beach has complied with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in identifying the environmental impacts of the
proposed commercial development of the Crest View School site, and in providing
opportunity for the public to review and comment upon the Draft Environmental Impact
Report (EIR). The City has notified all responsible agencies and interested groups and
individuals of the preparation of the EIR and has taken the following actions to solicit
public input during the preparation of the Draft EIR.
1. An Initial Study and Notice of Preparation (NOP) was prepared on August 15,
1997, for the proposed project by the City of Huntington Beach, Department of
Community Development. A copy of the Initial Study and Notice of
Preparation were included in the Draft EIR as Appendix A.1.
2. Written comments were received in response to the NOP and Initial Study. A
copy of these written comments was included in the Draft EIR as Appendix A.2.
<< 2i-1i i, i✓3 ;,.,�i� i 94
1os ruuz PCRIrvine 0004
3. A scoping meeting was held on Thursday, September 4, 1997 at 6:30 P.M. in
the Crest View School Multi-purposc Room to solicit input from the public and
public agencies in regard to the environmental issues anticipated by the proposed
project. The agenda package was distributed to scoping meeting attendees.
Comment cards were received during the scoping meeting in response to the
NOP and the Initial Study. A copy of the comment cards is included in
Appendix A.3 of the Crest View School Site Draft EIR. Additionally,
comments which were made during the meeting were transcribed and are also
included in Appendix A.3 of the project Draft EIR.
4. A Notice of Completion (NOC) and copies of the Draft EIR were filed with the
State of California Clearinghouse on May 4, 1998. The Draft EIR and NOC
were distributed to agencies, groups, organizations, and individuals. A copy of
the NOC and the State Clearinghouse distribution list is available for review and
inspection at the City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington
Beach, California 92648.
5. An official forty-five (45) day public review period for the Draft EIR was
established by the State Clearinghouse. It began Tuesday, May 5, 1998, and
was scheduled to end at 5:00 P.M. on Friday, June 19, 1998. Subsequently, it
was extended 10 days to allow public review of the document in the context of a
correction as noticed in an Errata distribution on May 14, 1998. Public letters
were accepted by the City through June 29, 1998. These letters are contained in
this document.
6. A Public information Meeting was held related to the proposed project on
Monday, June 8, 1998, at the Crest View School Multi-Purpose Room at 6:30
P.M. Verbal and written comments related to the Draft EIR were accepted at
this public meeting. A matrix of verbal continents and written comments
received at this meeting are also contained in this document.
7. In accordance with City policy, public meeting notices were mailed to all
property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the proposed project property
boundary. Additionally, notices were sent to individuals who requested to be
notified by completing a public meeting sign-in sheet, and to those individuals
who telephoned City Hall with a request to be notified.
In addition to public notices and scoping meetings, the Department of Community
Development has held workshops with the City Council and the PIanning Commission
to provide information on the EIR to the project decision-makers regarding the
environmental effects of the proposed project and public comment. These meetings
were held at 5:00 P.M. on July 14, 1998, and at 5:30 P.M. on July 28, 1998.
Ca1tiniL�.N i 1
mm Irvine 05
II. FINDINGS AND FACTS IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS FOR
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT
A. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT
The following summary briefly describes impacts determined to be less than significant
in the preparation of the Initial Study and EIR.
Initial Study
An Initial Study was prepared by the City of Huntington Beach to identify the potential
significance of the effects of the project. The Initial Study was completed and
distributed with the Notice of Preparation for the proposed project, dated August 15,
1997. The Initial Study determined that the proposed project would not have the
potential to result in significant impacts to Cultural Resources. All other topical areas
of evaluation as included in the Environmental Checklist were determined to require
further assessment in an EIR.
Draft EIR
This section identifies impacts of the proposed project determined to be less than
significant without implementation of project-specific mitigation measures. This
determination, however, does assume compliance with Standard City Policies and
Requirement as detailed in Chapter 5.0 of the Draft EIR.
Earth Resources
Proposed development would involve earthwork involving clearing, grubbing,
excavation, subgrade preparation, and placement and compaction of fill. A net import
of material of up' to 15,000 cubic yards would be required. Since site soils are
expansive, the import includes suitable soils to underlie the building pads. The project
would also introduce new buildings, employees, and customers to seismically active
areas typical of southern California. These impacts would be considered to be less than
significant upon compliance with Standard City Policies and Requirements, including
adherence to the recommendation of the project's Geotechnical Report.
Drainage and Surface Water Quality
Site development would substantially increase impervious surfaces on the property,
thereby increasing surface runoff from the project site. Runoff in excess of existing
conditions (10-year peak flow ninoff) would be detained on-site with a detention basin.
The project, therefore, would not adversely impact downgradient drainage systems or
capacities.
rcx Irvine 0006
An increase in the potential to contaminate surface waters due to construction-related
activities (sediment and vehicle leaks, etc.) and on-going operations such as the
automotive service center (potential spills of pctroleum products) would be mitigated by
compliance with Standard City Policies and Requirements. These include the submittal
and approval of a Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP).
The project site is located within an area classified by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) as Zone X - areas determined to be outside of the 500-
year flood plain. Flooding risks for the development, therefore, are considered
minimal, and do not require mitigation.
Biological Resources
There are no sensitive plant or wildlife species on the project site. The project would
involve the removal of 18 existing on-site trees. Compliance with the Standard City
Requirement to transplant trees or replace trees at a ratio of 2:1 would reduce this
impact, which is-not considered significant even without mitigation.
Noise
The proposed project would result in construction noise levels at adjacent residences
which may substantially exceed the 55 dBA standard for exterior, daytime noise levels.
Twelve residences, located within 100 feet of the proposed WalMart would be most
affected for a period of up to ten months. Based on applicant compliance with the
City's Noise Ordinance, this impact would be Iess than significant. The ordinance
restrict construction hours as follows:
• Construction shall be limited to Monday -Saturday, 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m
• Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays
Noise generated by general parking lot activity and the automotive service center would
not be expected to exceed allowable noise levels under the City's Noise Ordinance.
Due to attenuation due to distance and existing noise barriers (five-foot wall along south
boundary), these activities would not be significant before project mitigation.
The incremental increase in noise along Talbert Avenue due to project-generated traffic
would result in an estimated 1.5 dB to 1.8 dB increase noise along this roadway. Since
a 3 dB increase has been defined as the significance threshold, this impact is not
considered significant.
Aesthetics
The proposed project would completely alter the character and use of the project site.
With the incorporation of appropriate design elements, it would not, however,
introduce elements that would substantially detract from the existing visual character of
08/31/1998 09:12 949-360--6290 C LIN PAGE 02
WPI*MART•
August 31, 1999
Jim Lamb
Business Development
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street, Sth Floor
Huntington Beach,CA 92648
Dear Jim:
This letter is in response to your request for information about Wal-Mart benefits and
compensation:
• Benefits: Wal-Mart offers a comprehensive benefits package,including medical and dental
insurance,401(k);stock purchase and profit sharing plans. further,by achieving specified
financial goals set by the company,associates may qualify for the company's stakeholder
bonus program,entitling therm to receive a bonus check at the end of the fiscal year. Please
see attached list of benefits for detailed information.
• Compensation: As with other retailers, Wal-Mart does not release specific wage
information. However,we can tell you that Wal-Mart always provides compensation that is
market-based and competitive. These are not minimum-wage jobs. On the contrary, our
philosophy and policy is to be competitive in the local market We seek the best people in
the retail industry and provide competitive pay and benefits in order to attract and keep those
individuals
Wal-Mart takes pride in the fact that it is the nation's largest private employer and that it is
frequently mentioned in polls and surveys as one of the best companies to work for. We believe
in providing quality jobs with comprehensive benefits. And we believe in taking care of our
people because we know it is our people who make the difference. They are the key ingredient
to our success. Further,we believe in developing our associates, such that they can grow with
the company. In fact, 60 percent of our management started in the ranks of hourly associates.
I hope I have provided you with the information you need. Please feel free to call me should you
have any more questions. I may be reached at(949)360-7860.
Sincerely,
Cynthia Lin
Director of Community Affairs
West Region
West Region
27470 Alicia Parkway • Laguna Niguel.CA 92677 • 'telephone(714)3W7860 •Fax(714)360-0914
ATTACHMEN NIO. 4.
ba/�1/1yy8 dy: 1L y4y-ib0--b290 C LIN PAGE 04
Wal-Mart Associate Benefits Package
Full-time Associates
A full-time associate is one who regularly works at least?8 hours per week Eligible
full-time associates receive the following benefits:
• Medical Insurance
• Dental Insurance
• Company Paid Life insurance
• Optional Life Insurance
• Dependent Life Insurance
• Accidental Death and Dismemberment Insurance
• ShortiLong Term Disability
Profit Sharing(Must work a minimum of 1,0W hours per year)
• 401 K(Must work a minimum of 1,000 hours per year)
• Stock Purchase
• Vacation Pay
• Personal Time
• Jury Duty Pay
• Holiday Pay(for hourly Associates)after 90 days employment
• Associate Discount for Wal-Mart Associates. Associate Membership for
Sash's Partners
• Bereavement Leave
• Medical Leave
• Military Leave
• Personal Leave
• Scholarship Programs
• Resources for Living(Personal Counseling)
Peak Tiune Associates
A peak time associate is one who regularly works less than 28 hours per week_ Eligible
peak time associates receive the following benefits:
• Associate Only Medical Insurance(after 2 years of employment)
• 401K(Must work a minimum of 1,000 hours per year)
• Vacation(after 2 years of employment)
• Stock Purchase
• Associate Discount for Wal-Mart Associates. (Associate Membership for
Sam's Partners)
• Holiday Pay
• Jury Duty Pay
• Bereavement Leave of Absence
• Medical Leave of Absence
• Military Leave of Absence
• Personal Leave of Absence
• Scholarship Programs
• Resources for Living(Private Counseling Services)
ATTACHMENT NO. �'•°;
io.) Iuuz rum Irvine I J007
the area. Similarly, with the incorporation of appropriate design elements, the height
and bulk of the project can be compatible with existing, surrounding development.
Detailed evaluation of the visual impact of the proposed project would be part of the
design review process, and with much of the design information pending, it is difficult
in this EIR to assess the overall aesthetic impact of the project. Based on available_
information, and anticipating that the improvements to existing plans would be
implemented as recommended by City staff and the Design Review Board, it is not
expected that overall aesthetic impacts would represent a significant project impact.
The significance of loss of community open space is subjective. Some viewers may
perceive the proposed improvements and maintenance of the site as more visually
appealing than the existing, often dry grass area, and deteriorating school buildings and
playground. Other people clearly would prefer the visual sense of open space
associated with current site conditions. The Draft EIR concluded that the loss of open
space is not a significant aesthetic impact, but is, however, a significant land use impact
as discussed under Section C. of these findings.
The impact of project illumination would be reduced by project design, which would
minimise the amount of project illumination directed off-site. Lighting impacts were
determined to be less than significant.
Population and Housing
The WalMart would employ up to a maximum of 325 employees, including part-time
employees. It is anticipated that the majority of these employees would be from
Huntington Beach or adjacent cities. The project could result in a negligible increase in
City population if some employees relocate to the area. This is not considered a
significant impact and does not require mitigation.
Population and economic growth associated with the proposed project are not
anticipated to result in the requirement for additional housing. Moreover, development
of the property, which has an existing, underlying land use designation of R-7, Low-
Density Residential, would not appreciably affect the opportunities for new housing
within the City. Under this designation, a maximum of 96 units could be developed on
the 13.89-acre site. There are 214 acres of vacant residentially-zoned property, and 16
closed school sites with underlying residential designations within the City, which
combined, could accommodate over 4,000 units. The loss of the project site for
housing, therefore, is not considered significant.
Public Services and Utilities
Public Services
The proposed project would increase the demand for fire protection and police
protection services. According to the fire department, however, existing personnel,
__ .. _ •� r�tc ir�ine 0008
equipment, and facilities can meet the demands for the development. The police
department indicates that no additional equipment or facilities will be required, but that
an additional officer will be required to adequately serve the project. Based on the
fiscal analysis prepared for the project, the development as proposed would result in a
net fiscal surplus. Revenues from property and sales tax revenues, therefore, are
anticipated to cover the cost of additional government services, including police and fire
protection.
Based on computer simulations for maximum day conditions, the available fire flow
capacity to serve the project is estimated to be slightly less than that required by City
standards. Available capacity is estimated to be 3,814 gallons per minute (gpm) at 20
pounds per square inch (psi) compared to a requirement of 4,000 gpm. The Fire
Department has concluded that this capacity is acceptable, and therefore, this does not
represent a significant project impact.
OVSD has determined that Crest View will not be needed to accommodate existing or
future students.;"The elimination of the project site as a potential future school,
therefore, is not considered a significant impact. The project would beneficially impact
the school district by generating a long-term revenue stream from the ground lease.
The revenue is to be used for capital improvements and other projects at existing
schools within the district.
Utilities
Adequate service capacities are available to provide the project with electrical, natural
gas, communication, and solid waste services. Similarly, the development could
connect with existing sewer collection and treatment systems, which have adequate
capacities to serve the project.
The project would create a water demand that is in excess of existing and former uses
(the school) at the site, and would combine with other related projects to further impact
the City's water system, which is already deficient. The project demand, however, can
be met with planned improvements included in the City's Water Master Plan. Payment
of a Capital Facilities Charge by the applicant in accordance with the Water Master
Plan would contribute toward implementation of required, long-term system
improvements.
Energy
Construction activities for project development would consume approximately 21,000
gallons of fuel. On-going operations are estimated to require 3,252,650 kW-hr/yr of
electrical power and 6,090,000 cubic feet per year of natural gas. These impacts are
not considered significant.
v o.vv.ao cl:co p`J4y 103 IUUY _PCR Irvine 0009
Public health and Safety
Demolition of existing school buildings would increase the potential for the release of
hazardous materials, including asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint.
Construction activities would include the use and storage of potentially hazardous
materials, including fuels, oil, paints, coatings, adhesives, and cleaners. On-going
operations would include the generation of automotive-related wastes at the service
center, including petroleum product, solvents, and flammable materials. Compliance
with existing Standard City Policies and Requirements, including the submittal and
approval of a Hazardous Materials Business Plan, would minimize the potential public
risk associated with the materials. These impacts, therefore, are considered less than
significant.
B. IMPACTS MITIGATED TO LESS TITAN SIGNIFICANT
The following summary describes impacts of the proposed project that, without
mitigation, would result in significant adverse impacts. Upon implementation of the
mitigation measures provided in the EIR, these impacts can be mitigated to a less than
significant level.
Transportation/Circulation
Significant Effect
• The proposed project meets the traffic signal warrants for the main project driveway
at Talbert AvenueFinding
Finding (1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Findine
The significant effect would be reduced to a less than significant level upon
implementation of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR:
Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy:
T-1 The applicant shall construct a traffic signal at Talbert Avenue and the
main project driveway.
08/06/98 21:27 '&949 753 7002 PCR Irvine _. . 00 0
Significant Effect
• The proposed project would result in an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS "E")at
the intersection of Newland Street and Talbert Avenue by the Year 2020.
Finding
Finding (1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
idcntified in the Final OR
Farts in Sunnort of Funding
The significant effect would be reduced to a less than significant level upon
implementation of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR:
Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy:
T-2 The applicant shall install a protected left-turn signal at the Newland
Street/Talbert Avenue intersection.
Significant Effect
• The proposed project would contribute traffic to the following intersections
projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS "E" or worse) by the
Year 2020:
- Beach Boulevard at Slater Avenue (City of Huntington Beach)
- Bushard Street at Talbert Avenue (City of Fountain Valley)
Finfling
Finding (1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support o,f Finding
The significant effect would be reduced to a less than significant level upon
implementation of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR:
Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy:
usiuoias zl:zr O y4a !Ss /VVL MM Irvine _ _-- L9JUII
T-3 The applicant shall contribute a fair share payment to the City of
Fountain Valley to mitigate the deficiency described at the intersection of
Talbert Avenue and Bushard Street based on the vehicle trips added to
the intersection as predicted in the traffic impact assessment.
T-4 The applicant shall contribute a fair share payment to the City of
Huntington Beach to mitigate the deficiency described at the intersection
of Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue based on the vehicle trips added
to the intersection as predicted in the traffic impact assessment.
Additionally, the proposed project would be subject to the payment of Traffic Impact
Fees, a Standard City Requirement, to mitigate its cumulative impact on City-wide
roadways.
Noise
Significant EjfecF--
• Noise levels ranging from 77 dBA to 88 dBA at a distance of 10 feet would be
generated by WalMart delivery trucks. Based on the proposed on-site delivery
routes, noise levels in the backyards of the residences abutting the project site to the
east and south would be expected to reach 65 dBA. This level exceeds the 55 dBA
daytime maximum and 50 dBA nighttime maximum allowed by the City's Noise
Ordinance.
F'anding
Finding (1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect would be reduced to a less than significant level upon
implementation of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR:
N-1 Store deliveries shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and
10:00 P.M.
N-2 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, an acoustical analysis shall be
prepared to determine design level mitigation required for noise
generated by on-site activities, including truck deliveries and loading
dock operations. The study shall determine the precise height of a noise
wall system required along the east and south property boundaries to
V Ul VVl JV L1 LU VJ'f.' .Vv .vv.. •v.. �. _,_..-.._ .. ��._
successfully shield adjacent residential uses. (Based on the noise analysis
conducted for this EIR, an approximate 12-foot high wall will be
required along the entire east property and a portion of the south
boundary, and an approximate ten-foot high wall will be required along
the balance of the south property boundary)_ This study shall be
reviewed and approved by the City's Community Development
Department prior to the issuance of grading permits.
N-3 Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, an appropriate noise wall
system (pursuant to Mitigation Measure N-2) shall be constructed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Recreation
Significant Effect
• The propose4 project would result in the loss of approximately 9.0 acres of open
space/parkland currently available for passive recreational use.
l�ndi
Finding (1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect would be reduced to a less than significant level upon
implementation of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR:
Prior to the issuance of building permits:
R-1 Construction of access to Lambert Park from Newland Street shall be
required. A switchback ramp is anticipated to be required and shall be
provided pursuant to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
Act.
The Lambert Park site was developed as a park, in part, to preserve a known a
significant cultural resource. The site has been the subject of several archaeological
investigations and is protected by City policies. Although, based on the previous
investigations, it is not believed that there are archaeological resources within the area
which would be impacted by construction of improved access to the park, the following
mitigation is recommended to assure that existing resources are not impacted:
R-2 A Phase I archaeological study, including a literature search, records
search, field visit, and report outlining constraints or lack of constraints,
ATT \ 11; ll IT NO.
08/06/9S 'L1:19 C949 753 (UUZ rux lrvine Lfl01a____
shall be completed prior to construction of the access improvements. In
the event that constraints are identified, an archaeological monitor shall
be present during the construction of access improvements. The
archaeologist shall have the authority to stop construction activities in the
event archaeological resources are uncovered during grading until
inspection, evaluation, and recovery activities are completed.
Significant Effect
• The proposed project would result in the loss of open fields that are currently used
by youth sports teams. This loss of organized recreational opportunities is
considered a significant impact.
Findin
Finding (1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support o,f Finding
The significant effect would be reduced to a less than significant level upon
implementation of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR:
R-3 The City shall develop a phased, long-term agreement with OVSD to
mitigate the loss of recreational facilities at both the Crest View School
site and the Rancho View School site, which is also anticipated to be
developed with commercial uses. The agreement is anticipated to
incorporate the following:
Phase 1 — Upon development of the Crest View School site, facilities at
Lake View School should be improved to accommodate the youth soccer
and youth softball activities previously accommodated at Crest View.
This would require the relocation of two softball backstops and the
installation of one soccer field at Lake View.
Phase 2 - Upon development of the Rancho View School site, the Lake
View School site facilities should be reconfigured to accommodate two
skinned infield baseball diamonds (for the OV Little League). The
softball and soccer field at Lake View School would then need to be
relocated to the Park View School/Murdy Park site.
(*'`t
uo/vu/zoo 61.Ju (�.79D (JJ VVL ,v,. 1a .1uc a,J V1Y
C. UNAVOIDABLE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE 11"ACTS
Land Use
Significant Effect
• Implementation of the proposed project would result in combined, unmitigable
impacts to air quality, open space, and visual resources which represent a
significant land use compatibility impact of the proposed project.
Findina
Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR (Section 15091,of
the Guidelines).
Facts in Support of the Finding
Although implementation of the recommended mitigation measures for noise and traffic
impacts would reduce these project-related and cumulative impacts to a less than
significant level, other land use compatibility impacts could not feasibly be mitigated.
Air Quality, aesthetic, and land use impacts remain significant and combine to result in
a significant land use compatibility impact to surrounding land uses. Feasible air
quality measures are recommended; however, vehicular emissions for project-related
trips would still exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District's thresholds
of significance. Noise walls required to mitigate truck delivery noise would result in
significant visual and shadow impacts to surrounding residences. The significance of
noise and aesthetic impacts related to this issue represents a trade-off which needs to be
considered by the decision-makers (e.g., the significant visual impact can be eliminated
but would result in a significant noise impact).
Significant Effect
• Implementation of the proposed project would result in the loss of approximately
9 acres of community open space.
Finding
Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR (Section 15091 of
the Guidelines).
f 13
, �v►- �lSc.�1 ►v�.
��.1
uzs/UO/JS Z1:3u -Oy9y (ao (uuc rum 11-VlIlu _ lY.�u 1a
Facts in Support of Findings
Although measures are recommended in the EIR which would mitigate the loss of
recreational use of the subject property, such measures would not mitigate the sense of
open space and change in the character of the site with respect to the surrounding
community. Off-site acquisition of open space, even if economically feasible, would
not mitigate this impact, since the replacement would have to be within the immediate
neighborbood.
Air Quality
Significant Effect
• Operation of the proposed project would result in air emissions which exceed
the SCAQMD daily threshold emission levels for carbon monoxide, reactive
organic compounds, and nitrogen oxides. Exceedance of these thresholds and
inconsistency with the City's General PIan goal to improve air quality represents
a significant project-specific impact.
Finding
Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR (Section 15091 of
the Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding
Measures to encourage ridesharing and mass transit use would be implemented under
project compliance with the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance (see
Standard City Policies and Requirements) and the requirement to provide a bus stop on
Talbert Avenue (see Section 5.0, G, Transportation/Circulation). No additional,
feasible, mitigation measures have been identified in the EIR.
Even with the implementation of available measures to reduce long-term vehicle
emissions, the proposed project operations would result in emissions that exceed the
SCAQMD daily threshold emission levels for carbon monoxide, reactive organic
compounds, and nitrogen oxides. The project, therefore, would result in significant,
unavoidable operational and cumulative air quality impacts.
Significant Effect
• The proposed project's contribution to the number of vehicle trips is greater
than the project's contribution to employment when compared to the regional
average assumptions upon which the AQMP is based. Therefore, it is concluded
� r NT N0. q
Ud/Ub/U5 21:31 py49 tb3 IUUZ r%1x tr ine Q U I b
that development of the proposed project would have a cumulatively significant
impact upon air quality.
Findi
Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of
the Guidelines).
Facts in Support of F�'rndin�
See previous discussion under Air Quality (this section).
Aesthetics/Light
Significant Effect
• Recommended noise barrier walls, ranging from 10- to 12- feet in height along
the east and south perimeters of the project site.
Find in
Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR (Section 15091 of
the Guidelines).
Facts in Sunnort gf Finding
Walls in excess of 10 feet in height are expected to be required even if truck deliveries
are restricted to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. These walls would
introduce an element that is out of scale, and visually detracting to the residences
located along the east and south project site boundaries. The 12-foot wall required
along the east boundary would also result in a significant shadow impact to residences
that abut this side of the property. This impact is a result of recommended mitigation.
Elimination of this mitigation would result in a significant noise impact.
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Pursuant to Section 15126 (d) of the CEQA Guidelines, Section 6.0 of this EIR
describes and evaluates several project alternatives. In accordance with CEQA,
alternatives are to be defined which:
• Are capable of either eliminating or reducing significant adverse impacts
associated with the proposed project, and;
uaivo�aa u:a� pa4a tai tvuc VI
• Have the potential to feasibly attain the basic objectives of the proposed
project.
Based on these criteria, the following alternatives were selected for detailed review in
.the EIR:
• Alternative "A" - Alternate Site Plan - Reconfiguration of the site plan to
locate the WalMart on the west side of the site, thereby backing to commercial
uses instead of residential uses. Essentially, this plan would be an east/west
reversal of the proposed plan.
• Alternative "B" - Combined Residential and Park Use - Approximately one-
half of the site would be developed as multi-family housing, and the remainder
of the site would be improved for open space recreational use.
• Alternative "C" - Low Density Housing (Development Under Existing
General Plan and Zoning) - Entire site would be developed as low-density
housing at a maximum density of 7 dwelling units per acre for a total of up to 96
units.
• Alternative "D" - No Project - Under this alternative, which is required to be
analyzed by CEQA, the proposed project would not be developed. It is assumed
that the site would continue to be leased by OVSD under various short-term
lease agreements.
Based on the analysis in the EIR, each of these alternatives was determined to be
environmentally superior to the proposed project. The No Project alternative was
determined to be the most environmentally superior alternative. Among the other
alternatives, Alternative "B," Development of Combined Residential and Park Use,
would result in the greatest reduction in impacts compared to the proposed project.
This alternative would reduce the most critical impacts of the project, including land
use, transportation, air quality, noise, aesthetics, and recreation-related impacts.
Similar to the No Project Alternative, all impacts under Alternative "B" could be
mitigated to a less than significant level, compared to the proposed project, which
would result in significant unavoidable impacts to air quality, land use, and aesthetics.
In addition to the alternatives which were evaluated in detail, the EIR summarized other
alternatives which were considered by the Lead Agency but were rejected as infeasible
during the scoping process. These included several development alternatives and also
the development of the proposed project at an alternative location.
iviu ��
Following are the Findings of Fact for the alternatives which were evaluated in detail in
the EIR:
• Alternative "A" -Alternate Site Plan
Finding
Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of
the Guidelines).
Facts in SyMrt of Finding
Although this alternative appears capable of attaining the applicant's primary objectives
of developing an attractive, viable retail center in the trade area, the applicant has
indicated that WalMart will not support opening a store at this location if it does not
face the-major arterial, Beach Boulevard.) The Sedway Group report, conducted to
evaluate the market feasibility of this alternative, substantiates that orienting WalMart
toward Beach Boulevard (as in the proposed project) is superior to this alternative from
the standpoint of marketability. This alternative, therefore, would not meet the project
objectives of either the City of the project applicant.
• Alternative "B" — Combined Residential and Park Use
F Wding
Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR (Section 15091 of
the Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding
This alternative could meet the City objective of creating a "development compatible
with, and sensitive to, the existing and surrounding land uses in the project area." It
would not, however, achieve other primary project objectives for the City, including
the promotion of "big box" commercial projects and balancing the cost of new
development with the costs of services. In particular, a long-term cost of park
maintenance would be incurred by the City under this alternative.
! Correspondence to Thomas F.Love,Arne[Retail Group from Steven P. Lan, Real Estate
Manager, WalMarr Stores,May 14, 1997
b*1?
• Alternative "C" -Low Density Housing (Development Under Existing
General Plan and Zoning)
Findin
Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR (Section 15091 of
the Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding
This alternative could meet the City objective of creating a "development compatible
with, and sensitive to, the existing and surrounding land uses in the project area." It
would not, however, achieve other primary project objectives for the City, including
the promotion of "big box" commercial projects and facilitating market-driven
commercial development.
It is likely that implementation of this alternative would require that the school district
sell the property instead of negotiating a long-term lease. This would not meet the
intent of OVSD's Real Property Asset Management Plan to pursue a ground lease of
this site. Although income derived from the sale of the property could be used for
district-wide school improvements as intended under the proposed project, the return on
the property for residential use would be less than the proposed project.
• Alternative I'D" -No Project
Fin 'n
Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of
the Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding
Existing conditions represent development and activities that are "compatible with, and
sensitive to the existing and surrounding land uses in the project area," and therefore,
this alternative would attain this City objective. This alternative would also assist in
maintaining long-term need for adequate open space and recreational areas. It would
not, however, achieve other primary project objectives for the City including the
promotion of "big box" commercial projects and ancillary uses that convey a high-
quality visual image and would not promote market-driven development.
This alternative would not implement OVSD's decision to negotiate a long-term lease
for the Crest View site, and would not develop a revenue stream to adequately sustain
_t���H�l 1tviL":iv 1 1��. � •
vv vv vv ri.vz yv1•i .vv •vvr •v. as •aaa . WJ/. VGV
and improve school facilities. Since the school district has complied with the state law
and offered to the State and other public agencies, and none of these offers has been
accepted, the district may market the property to the public. Maintenance of the site as
an existing closed school supporting short-term leases is unlikely, and financially
unattractive for the school district.
-MENT I
A T
7
TA- ,
C-, ,
t�� z
z
3 k
I
RECEIVED
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT AUG 1 41998
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
a�
�R CREST VIEW
..
COMPENDIUM OF:
I
COMMITTEE MEETINGS
BOARD MEETINGS
NEWSPAPER ARTICLES
5
UBLWI HEARING
DISTRICT PUBLICATIONS
Y SESSIONS
x � � 3 COMMUNITY MEETINGS
{ .5
d'..�,p..�.r-; .wlrY'aw'�'.! �' S"t'a^rYf$n�•_.e+�-a .v,
E
August 14, 1998
James R. Tarwater, Ed.D.
f District Superintendent
_ s
in
.MEN NO 3. 1
ATTAOH T
� _
Ocean View School District
O17200 Pinehurst Lane District Superintendent Board of Trustees
Huntington Beach James R.Tarwater, Ed. D. Tracy Pellman, President
California 92647-4846 Linda Kovach,Clerk
0�40 *�
714/847-2551 Peg Edey, Member
Fax: 714/847-1430 Carol Kanode, Member
Web:www.ovsd.org Pam Walker, Member
Quest of
Excellence" We are an equal opportunity employer.This District does not discriminate on the basis of age,gender or handicap.
Excellence"
August 14, 1998
SUBJECT: CREST VIEW SCHOOL
Phase One- Intggration/Reconfiguration Plan:
In 1990, Dr. Monte McMurray, District Superintendent, and the Board of Trustees,reconvened a
Master Planning Committee/Committee of Eleven. The Master Planning Committee was then
subdivided into an Integration/Reconfiguration Committee. These two Committees were charged
with the responsibility of examining and correcting any imbalance of the ethnic ratio at our schools
and at the same time, reconfiguring Ocean View's K-8 schools to K-5/6-8 schools. That meant
some schools would be closed and students would be reassigned. Using specific criteria for
determining school closures, the Committee recommended that Crest View become a closed site.
The established criterion is enclosed, and included priorities such as: student safety, enrollment,
school plant, geographic consideration, financial savings,transportation, value of the site, student
population growth,etc. The criterion remains the same for today. At a Regular Board meeting held
on June 4, 1991, Dr. Monte McMurray, District Superintendent, recommended the Board's
approval of the Master Planning Committee's school closure recommendations(Haven View and
Crest View). The Board approved the closing of Haven View and Crest View,to become effective
June 30, 1992.
Phase Two - Real Property Asset Management Committee/Community Budget Advisory
Committee:
On May 19, 1992, Crest View was officially declared surplus property for lease or sale by the
adoption of Resolution No. 12:9192 by the Board of Trustees. At that point in time, the Real
Property Asset Management Committee/Community Budget Advisory Committee began the process
of looking for developers and pursuing long term ground lease options for all closed school
properties. Richard V. Godino, Attorney, Bergman & Wedner, Inc., was retained by the District
to work with the Board and Administration on long range plans for the possible disposition of
property which was determined to be surplus and to pursue a comprehensive plan which would
ensure a long term income stream to the District. The City of Huntington Beach, upon advice of
Mr. Godino,was sent statutory notices regarding the Crest View site. These documents were also
mailed to other government agencies, as required. On November 18, 1993, the Request for
Qualifications was prepared,and Mr. Godino stated that the waiver request had been completed, as
ATTACHMENT NO. 3 .2
Crest View School -2- August 14, 1998
well as all statutory notices sent. Mr. Godino further reported that the City (of Huntington Beach)
is in accord with the(District's proposed) development of the Crest View site for retail or possibly
mixed retail/residential use. On February 7, 1994, Mr. Godino reported that the Request for
Qualifications had been sent to over 375 developers and more than twenty RFQs have been
received. From these, the Board will select those to whom the RFP will be sent. On April 2, 1996,
at a Regular Board meeting, the Trustees approved entering into an Exclusive Rights Agreement
with Mr. Tom Love, Arnel Retail for the Crest View site.
Attached is a compendium of committee meetings, Board meetings, newspaper articles, public
hearing, District publications, study sessions, and community meetings regarding Crest View that
occurred from 1990 - 1998. Please note that seventy meetings took place during this time period,
and these were open to the public, either for comments or observation or both.
Sincerely,
ames R. Tarwater, Ed.D.
District Superintendent
JRT:gb
Attachments
ATrACH,MENT NO.
CREST VIEW
CRITERIA
FOR CLOSURE OF ANY
SCHOOL SITE
ATTACHMENT NO. 3 `�
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT Revised
MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE 4/25/90
SCHOOL CLOSURE CRITERIA
The following are to be taken into consideration in the
determination of school closures. They are not in priority order
and are to be used as guidelines rather than absolutes.
Student Safety
Student safety is of primary concern and shall be taken into
consideration.
Enrollment
Decisions on closures and consolidations should provide sufficient
enrollment to allow for flexibility of student placement and equity
in educational services. Optimum student enrollment is defined as
the highest student enrollment avoiding, wherever possible, the
utilization of converted space which houses programs valuable to
the school. On a K-8 campus, a 7/8 student enrollment minimum of
360 should be maintained; 1-1/2 classes per grade level K-6
minimum. On a K-6 campus, 2-1/2 classes per grade level is the
minimum expectancy.
Changing Schools
The number of students involved in changing schools should be
minimized while still providing for optimum enrollments and best
use of facilities across the District.
Options should be considered to avoid back-to-back school changes
for students.
School Plant
The relative difference between site flexibility, condition of
buildings, and square footage of the plants will be weighed in
conjunction with other criteria (asbestos, deferred maintenance,
utilities, etc. ) .
Support facilities (library, rest rooms, lunch areas) should also
be considered.
Geographic Considerations
The committee will recommend boundaries based on student population
density in the areas under consideration. Consideration should be
given to maintaining a geographical balance of school sites within
the District.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
Financial Savings
The financial advantage of school closure should result in more
effective use of limited District finances and a more equitable
distribution of per pupil expenditures.
Feeder Schools
It is desirable, but not always feasible, to have exiting school
populations attending the same receiving school.
Transportation
Closures may result in added transportation services. In these
instances, cost will be minimized within the constraints of student
safety.
Value of the Site
As closure proposals are finalized, the committee will be aware of
the value of the site for other uses. While present debt under the
state-aid building fund program precludes the profits of any
building, sale from accruing to the District, the sites can and
should be leased.
Student Population Growth
Proposals for closure will attempt to take into consideration the
projected student population growth.
Impact of Consolidation on Closure
The removal of a 7/8 program from a school would not necessarily
target that school for closure.
Special Programs
The impact of change, (either closure or receiving of new students)
on affected schools will be reviewed in regard to the financial and
program impact of its special projects and facilities.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3- �
CREST VIE'
COMPENDIUM
PHASE ONE
ATTACHMENT NO. 3��
PHASE ONE:
DISTRICT MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE/COMMITTEE OF ELEVEN AND
INTEGRATION/RECONFIGURATION COMMITTEE
February 1990
Dr. McMurray, Superintendent, and Board of Trustees reconvened a Community Master
Planning Committee/Committee of Eleven. Members names attached. Each school had two
community members to represent them on the Committee. Crest View's community
representatives were Susie Keeling and Joel Williams. District Integration Advisory Committee
also in place.
Aril 24. 1990- Regular Board Meeting
Master Planning Committee/Committee of Eleven discussed Charge/Reconfiguration/Closures.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
May 24. 1990 - Public Hearing
Public Hearing was held by Master Planning Committee/Committee of Eleven at Ocean View
High School. Information was passed out to audience. Each speaker was allowed 5 minutes.
Forty-nine individuals spoke, representing different schools. One student from Crest View
spoke.
Scott Miller, member of Committee of Eleven, announced to audience that open Board meetings
would be held June 4, 1990, and June 6, 1990.
June 4, 1990 - Public Hearing
Special Board Meeting was held to conduct another Public Hearing on school closures. District
Master Planning Committee recommendations were shared. Meeting was held at Marina High
School Gymnasium.
June 5. 1990- Public Hearing
Special Board Meeting was held at Marina High School Gymnasium to reconvene the Public
Hearing held on June 4, 1990. There were approximately 350 visitors in the audience. A review
and discussion of the Master Planning recommendations took place regarding school closures
and consolidation.
October 23. 1990- Regular School Board Meeting
Additional members approved for Master Planning Committee/Committee of Eleven.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
November 13. 1990 - Regular School Board Meeting
Additional members approved for Master Planning Committee-employees and community
members.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
1
ATTACHMENT NO. -S `
November 30 1990- Newspaper Article Crest View Closure
Trustees adopted criteria for identifying racially isolated schools under which Oak View
and Crest View's middle school grades must be desegregated before the 1991-92 school
year.
December 5 1990 - Regular Board Meeting- District Organizational Study
Meeting held regarding purpose of Master Planning Committee and District Integration Plan.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
JanurX 17. 1991 - Special Board Meeting
Review of reorganization(reconfiguration/closure of schools)
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
January 23, 1991 - Community Meeting
Public meeting held at Crest View regarding integration/reconfiguration/closure of school.
Janu= 1992 - Community Meetings
Six community meetings held throughout the month of January to explain Integration
Plan/Possible Closures, including Crest.
januaU 29. 1991 - Community Meeting Schedules
Schedule of community meetings regarding reconfiguration/closures distributed to staff and
community members. Listed locations, dates, times and items to be discussed.
February 5. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Public Hearing conducted on District Integration/Conceptual Plan. Included possible closures.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
February 19. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Superintendent's recommended District Integration Plan presented as information.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
February 21. 1991 - Publication prepared
"Your Schools"publication prepared for all residences and commercial establishments.
Included Notice of Public Hearing and Board action date of March 5, 1991,regarding
recommended integration plan. (Topics included reconfiguration/closures, schedule of
community meetings, Board hearings and action dates).
February 27. 1991 - Special Board Meeting
Study of recommendations on reconfiguration/closures. Public comment not solicited, but
public invited to observe. Written recommendation from Master Planning Committee to close
Crest View.
February 28. 1991 - Publication mailed
"Your Schools"mailed.
2
ATTACHMENT NO. 3. �
March 5. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Public Hearing conducted regarding Superintendent's recommended District Integration Plan.
Action on the plan scheduled for this meeting,but recommendations for reconfiguration/closures
will be presented as information only.
Dr. McMurray, Superintendent, announced that a letter was sent home with all students
announcing community meetings regarding reconfiguration.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
March 7. 1991 - Crest View Community Meeting
Public meeting held at Crest View- reconfiguration and recommendatio to close Crest.
Listed all Master Planning meetings.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
March 12. 1991 - Public Hearing
Public Hearing conducted on reconfiguration/closures.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
March 13. 1991 - Community Meeting
Meeting regarding reconfiguration/recommendations held at Crest View on Crest, Lake, and
Oak. Forty-seven(47)people attended. Crest View residents distributed their own flyer
urging residents to attend meeting and vocalize opposition to closure/development.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
March 18. 1991 -Special Board Meeting- Study Session
Meeting regarding District Integration Plan/Reconfiguration. Public input not solicited, but
invited to observe.
March 19. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Action on reconfiguration/closures.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted. Crest View parent addressed the
Board.
April 2. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Announced meeting to be held at Crest View on Integration Plan. Meeting scheduled for April
15, 1991. Urged Principals to hold reconfiguration/informational meetings with parents. June 4,
1991, was designated as a Public Hearing date for action on Comprehensive Plan(closures).
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
April 9. 1991 - Special Board Meeting
District Conceptual Plan for Integration which included reconfiguration and closures was
discussed.
Public Hearing scheduled for May 14, 1991.
Public input not solicited but public invited to observe.
3
ATTACHMENT NO.
April 10. 1991 - Public Meeting Regarding Crest Closure
Community Information Meeting held. Agenda included summary of questions from January
23, 1991 to January 31, 1991. Time lines provided. Questions from audience solicited.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
April 12. 1991 - 30-Day Notice on Hearing for Integration Plan
Notice was published in local newspaper.
April 15, 1991 - Crest View Community Information Meeting
Community meeting held at Crest View. Advisory Committee recommendation presented"to
close Crest."
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
April 16. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Crest View closure and redesignation of students was discussed.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
Ap-dl 21-ARri125. 1991 - Collaborative Bargairiffig/Integration Plan
Discussion with bargaining units on Integration Plan along with plan to close Crest. Staff
members only, some of whom were and continue to be Crest View residents.
April 30. 1991 - Board Study Session
Meeting regarding tentative Comprehensive Plan that incorporated Integration/Reconfiguration
recommendations and school closures.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
May 2. 1991 - Special Board Meeting
Reviewed tentative school closures and time line.
Public input not solicited but public invited to observe.
May 7. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Report on Community Support Survey Results presented. (School closures and Integration
Plan/Crest View parents surveyed generally negative).
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted
May 14. 1991 - Public Hearing
Public Hearing conducted and action taken on District Integration Plan. (Included school
closures).
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted
May 14. 1991 - PTA/PTO/PTSA Information Meeting
Discussed Integration Plan as well as closure of school sites, including Crest View.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
4
ATTACHMENT NO. 3•
May 6. 1991 - Special Board Meeting Study Session
Review of staffs final Comprehensive Plan. Recommendations for school closures and time
line was discussed.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
May 20, 1991 - Publication Mailed
"Your Schools"included information on Integration/Reconfiguration/School Closures. Schedule
of community meetings to be held at each school was included.
May 21, 1991 -Regular Board Meeting
Superintendent stated that "Your Schools"would be delivered to all postal drops describing
Integration Plan/Reconfiguration/School Closures and schedule of public meetings
included.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
May 28,1991 - June 3, 1991 - Community Information Meetings
Community meetings held at school sites on the Comprehensive Plan.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
June 4. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Public Hearing conducted on Comprehensive Plan and action taken. Meeting was held at Ocean
View High School Gym.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
June 4. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Recommendation to close Crest View and Haven View as of June 30, 1992. Board-approved
action. Principals directed to include this information in their end-of-year newsletters.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
July 8. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Implementation of Integration/Reconfiguration decisions-planning process. Dr. McMurray,
Superintendent, stated actions will be included in District Strategic Action Plan to be brought to
Board in October.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
September 19. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Master Planning Committee of Eleven directed to study Crest View and Haven View as
surplus properties for following their closure in June 1992.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
October 1. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Integration Advisory Committee- Discussion held on Integration Plan included
Reconfiguration/Closures/Asset Management.
The 1991-92 Integration Advisory Committee Charge was approved.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 3• IZ
November 5. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
District Management Plan was discussed that stipulated a monthly update on Reconfiguration be
provided to the Board.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
November 19. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Plans for Integration were presented that included reassignment of Crest View's 7th/8th graders
and retain plan to close Crest and reassign all K-5 students to Lake View.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
December 10. 1991 - Regular Board Meeting
Modified Plan for Integration presented. Committee members provided written report with
recommendation to maintain Plan to close Crest View. Recommended for implementation
beginning September 1992.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
Janjory 13. 1992 - Special Board Meeting
Superintendent reviewed steps that led to Board's decision to move to a middle school
configuration(K-5/6-8).
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
January 14. 1992 - Regular Board Meeting
Reconfiguration update presented. Modified Plan for Integration approved, including
recommendation to close Crest.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
6
ATTACHMENT NO, 13
CREST VIEW
COMPENDIUM
PHASE TWO
ATTACHMENT NO. 3 •��
PHASE TWO:
REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT COMMMEE/COMMUNITY BUDGET
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
February 18, 1992 - March 3, 1992 -Real Proper Asset Management Committee
Convened
Convened a Real Property Asset Management Committee and appointed members, including
members from last three Master Planning Committees to provide continuity. These members
had worked on Integration Plan/Reconfiguration Plan and recommendations for
closures/reassignment of students.
April 7. 1992 - Special Board Meeting
Established Charge to Real Property Asset Management Advisory Committee (sale/lease of
school district propertylbudget considerations or a combination thereof). Advisory Committee
made up of staff and community members.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
May 19, 1992 - Regular Board Meeting
Resolution 12:9192 adopted declaring Haven View and Crest View as surplus property(intent to
lease).
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
June 18. 1992 - Reaular Board Meeting
Public Hearing and Authorization to File Supplemental Negative Declaration Regarding the
Comprehensive Plan for Integration, Reconfiguration, and School Closure. Adopted and filed.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
July 7. 1992 - Special Board Meeting- Study Session
Discussion took place between OVSD Board of Trustees and Real Property Asset Management
Advisory Committee(examining all closed school sites and recommendations).
Public comment not solicited but public invited to observe.
July 21, 1992 - Regular Board Meeting- Study Session
Real Property Asset Management Plan presented and reviewed. Included information on various
options, including sale/lease of surplus properties. Site recommendations for conversion were
presented. Analysis of Crest View was presented done by Real Property Asset Management
Committee. Recommendation to convert property from school site to income producing
immediately.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
August 10. 1992 - Regular Board Meeting- Study Session
Asset Management Plan - Study Session addressing leases/policy decisions, etc.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
7
ATTACHMIE T NO. 3.1�
October 20. 1992 - Regular Board Meeting- Study Session
Real Property Asset Management Plan- Reviewed proposed options regarding District
properties.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
January 11. 1993 - Regular Board Meeting
Real Property Asset Management Plan - Reviewed proposed options regarding District
properties.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
February 2. 1993 - Regular Board Meeting
Real Property Asset Management Plan- Reviewed proposed options regarding District
properties.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
February 9, 1993 - Special Board Meeting
Real Property Asset Management Plan- Discussed long term lease or joint venture for Crest
View site. Established a time line for discussion of Advisory recommendations on Crest
and also potential leasing opportunities.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
March 8, 1993 - Special Board Meeting
Discussion and approval of a long term ground lease for Crest View. This recommendation
came from the Real Property Asset Management Committee.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
July 13, 1993 - Regular Board Meeting
Information provided regarding Real Property Asset Management Plan. Board directed
Administration and Development Consultant to immediately begin discussions with City
regarding all District properties with particular emphasis on Crest View and Rancho
View. Also directed to commence process for selection of a developer.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
August 24. 1993 - Special Board Meeting
Public Hearing conducted proposing a Waiver Request for Crest View and Resolution No.
5:9394- Intention to Enter into a Joint Venture. Discussion held.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
September 4. 1993 - Public Notice
Published Public Notice regarding Public Hearing for September 7, 1993 on disposition of
surplus real property.
8
A7ACHMEN ! 1-40. S.1P
Sgptember 7. 1993 - Regular Board Meeting
Public Hearing conducted regarding Crest View Waiver and Resolution No. 5:9394 - Intention
to Enter into a Joint Venture. Discussion held and approval granted.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
Member 7. 1994 - Regular Board Meeting
Board Study Session held regarding OVSD Real Property/Asset Management Plan providing
current status on closed school sites, and specifically, Crest View.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
December 5. 1995 - Regular Board Meeting
Community members from Crest View presented concerns regarding long term
lease/rezoning/and/or sale of Crest View.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
December 14, 1995 -Newspaper Article Regarding Crest View
Newspaper article published in Independent reporting that residents oppose strip mall on old
school site(Crest View).
January 11. 1996- Meeting between District and Three Crest View Residents
Meeting held at District offices with three Crest View residents to listen to their concerns and
respond to questions (Robert Cronk, Marvin Josephsen, and Debbie Josephsen).
januwZ� 16. 1996 - Flyer Published by Crest View Residents
Citizens group wanted to reopen Crest. Distributed flyers urging residents to attend January 16,
1996, Regular Board meeting.
Januaa 16. 1996 - Regular Board Meeting
Ten community members addressed the Board of Trustees regarding opposition to commercial
development of Crest View site. Letter received January 26, 1996, from Mr. Cronk.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
Jam= 18. 1996 -Ne=aper Article
Article published in Wave reporting opposition to Crest View retail plans. Mr. Cronk quoted.
February 1. 1996 - Crest View Community Mee ' g
Meeting held at Crest View School with community members regarding commercial
development plan by OVSD and City of Huntington Beach. Superintendent sent a follow-up
letter to all Crest View residents.
February 5. 1996 -Newspaper Article
Orange County Register article published reporting on disposition of surplus schools, and
specifically, Crest View School.
9
_ATTACHMENT NO. 3. t-7
Aril , 1996- Regular Board Meeting
OVSD Board of Trustees approved entering into an Exclusive Rights Agreement with Arnel
Retail for the Crest View site.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
July 1. 1996 - City Council Meeting
Vote taken on the commercial development of Crest and Rancho(6:1 in favor). Four Ocean
View community members addressed the Council in favor of these commercial developments.
October 29. 1996 - Special Board Meeting
Public Hearing conducted and action on Waiver Renewal request for Crest View(Bidding
Procedures for Disposition of Real Property and Selection of a Developer). Approved.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted. No requests made to address Board.
March 4, 1997 - Regular Board Meeting
Proposal presented regarding amendment to ground lease on Crest View. Arnel and City
Council members addressed Board.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
June 24. 1998 - Regular Board Meeting
Posted notice of Public Hearing and delivered notices to Crest View residents on Second
Amendment on Agreement to Lease and Title Order Instructions for Crest View School. (Not
legally required to provide notice--did so in interest of being good neighbor).
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
July 7, 1998 - Regular Board Meeting
Public Hearing conducted on Second Amendment on Agreement to Lease and Title Order
Instructions for Crest View School. Crest View United made comments to the OVSD Board of
Trustees regarding the negative impact of commercial development at Crest.
Open meeting. Oral communication from public accepted.
10
ATTACHMENT t,,410. 3.15_
CREST VIEW
FIRST COMMITTEE
TO MAKE
RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR CLOSURE OF SITE
ATTACHMENT NO. 3 .1°l
Ocean View School District
Minutes of the February 27, 1990 Board Meeting
Page 14
Appointment of It was moved by Mrs. Garrick, seconded by Mrs. Marcus,
Master Planning to approve the following members of the Master
Committee Appvd. Planning Committee:
Community Members - Sally Alvino (Circle
- Arnold Alvarez (Circle)
- Sally Beelner (College)
- Scott Miller (College)
- Susie Keeling (Crest)
- Joel Williams (Crest)
- Donna Schwab (Golden)
- Eileen Mori (Golden)
- Bev Rau (Harbour)
- Laurie Cable (Harbour)
- Steve Buhrig (Haven)
- Bob Ewing (Haven)
- Laura Medlen (Hope)
- Roger Domercq (Hope)
- Angie Wright (Lake)
- Julie Grabel (Lake)
- Julie Engquist (Marine)
- Kathleen Nutting (Marine)
- Paul Martin (Mesa)
- Judy Goode (Mesa)
- Laura Peterson (Oak)
- Paula Medeck (Oak)
- Maureen Mirjahangir (Spring)
- Tracy Pellman (Spring)
- Bob Vines (Star)
- Debi Scott (Star)
- Marianne Cordeiro (Sun)
- 2nd rep. to be named (Sun)
- Steve Moritz (Village)
- Tim Engler (Village)
- Wileen Ferris (Vista)
- Dick Cook (Vista)
Committee Members - Susan Tarasut (Westmont)
- Donna Raymond (Westmont)
Principals - Gayle Bowles
- Diane Hobbensiefken
- Bob Vouga
District Staff - Paul Mercier
- Joe Condon
- Gayle Wayne
Superintendent (ex-officio) - Monte C. McMurray
Board Members (ex-officio) - Charles Osterlund
- Janet Garrick
CSEA representative to be named.
OVTA representatives (2) to be named.
Motion carried unanimously.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3.20
CREST VIEW
ATTACHMENTS
to
COMPENDIUM
ATTACHMENT NO. 3• ZI
LOSANGELES TIAa
ge County_ Focus s .3
NORTHWEST
f1tlUY1gI0f1 Beach
$ed Beach
•Bums Park
■sairtm
HUNTINGTON BEACH;::
i
Dese' gregatYon1Pa4iel
Holds First_Meeting
"P.
A 40-member committee charged
with the task of desegregating Oak
View School,whose student population
is overwhelmingly Latino, began its
three-month effort t4-an inaugural
meeting Wednesday.
The Ocean View �tary School
District Board of �. formed the
committee last moa"�D';fii'�response to
concerns that OalcSf�e2v -School has
grown increasingly.saffrempted in recent
years. J I
According to last a enrollment
figures. more than 80%-of the school's
students are Latino,reflecting the eth-
nic makeup of the neighborhood near
Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue. -
State officials ezamine school dis-
trict's ethnic enrollment distribution
every five years, and any imbalance
requires a plan to correct the situation.
Ocean View's neat review is sched-
uled this year.
If the district is not working on a
desegregation plan by the time of the
state review, it could be penalized by
the state, which could result in state
funds being withheld.officials said.
The district's Integration Advisory
Committee is made up of parents,teach-
ers, administrators and city and com-
munity representatives.
The committee's mission statement,
which trustees approved this week,
calls for the group to review the ethnic
distribution of each of the district's 17
schools during the past five years.
Members have been charged with pro-
posing long-range plans for integrating
Oak View with any other schools in the
district to correct the racial imbalance.
—JOHN PENNER
�i2
ATTACHMENT NUJ. ; a
B2 FRIDAY,NOVEMBER 30, IM/OC
Omni
HUNTINGTON BEACH
jM
Sea h
Crest View School = `''
iyuperna"Park
May Face Closure •Stanton
.La Palma
•Los Alamitos
The board of the Ocean View School ■Rossmoor
District this week took its first step
toward a reorganization plan that prob-
ably would close Crest View School at the nated in a proposal to close Golden View,
end of the school year. Haven View and Lake View schools.
Trustees adopted criteria for identify- Board members voted to postpone those
ing racially isolated schools under which closures for at least a year:
Oak View School and Crest View's mid- The board is scheduled next spring to
dle-school grades must be desegregated consider the sweeping budget and inte-
before the 1991-92 school year. gration questions posed by reorganize-
District officials said the move will tion. Three newly elected trustees join
prompt further study into a conceptual the board next month.
desegregation plan proposed last month —JOHN PENNER
by district staff and consultants.
That plan calls for Crest View's sev-
enth- and eighth-grade students to be
transferred to other schools. Removing
those students from the kindergarten-
through-eighth-grade campus would re-
duce the school's enrollment to about half
the district average, making it a leading
candidate for closure,officials said.
Designating Crest View's middle school
students as racially imbalanced "clearly
positions Crest View for closure,"Assist-
ant Supt.Paul Mercier said
"But,"he added,"I do not believe Crest
View automatically will be closed. . .or
that this plan will be limited to just that
closure."
The adopted criteria, under which
schools with more than 48% or less than
8% ethnic minority students are consid-
ered to be segregated,is the basis of the
district's ongoing effort to correct its
schools'racial imbalances to comply with
state law.
The integration-based reorganization
was prompted by last year's enrollment
figures that showed 86% of Oak View's
students are ethnic minorities, including
70%Latinos.
Based upon that enrollment report,
68% of Crest View's middle-school stu-
dents are minority students.
Under the proposed reorganization,
Oak View would become a magnet center
for the district's incoming limited-Eng-
lish-speaking students.
The desegregation issue in recent
months has become intertwined with the
district's continuing budget-cutting reor-
ganization study, which last June culmi-
ATTACHMENT NO. 3.23. b
MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE
1990-91
NAME REPRESENTATION
Mr. Vince Sipkovich Circle View
Mr. Scott Miller College View
Mr. Jose Ramirez Crest View
Mrs. Ellyn Hale Golden View
Mrs. Beverly Rau Harbour View
Mrs. Carla Hendrick Haven View
Mr. Roger Domercq Hope View
Mr. Dave Force Lake View
Mrs. Sally Alvino Marine View
Mr. Roger Harvey Mesa View
Mrs. Berta Ramirez Oak View
Mrs. Kim Rylander Spring View
Mr. Robert Van Aken Star View
Mr. Jim Haley Sun View
Mr. Tim Engler Village View
Mr. Randy Vanderhook Vista View
Mrs. Susan Tarasut Westmont
Mr. Steve Winders OVTA
Mrs. Frances Andrade CSEA
Mrs. Nancy Nunez Bilingual
Mrs. Daneel Juri,chko Special Education
Mr. Richard Papini-Chapla GATE
Mrs. Gayle Bowles Principal
Mr. Joe Condon Administrative Staff
Mr. John Thomas Administrative Staff
ATTACHMENT NUJ. 3.2, E
235.13
Ocean View School District
'inutes of the November 13 , 1990 Regular Board Meeting
Page 14
Bd. Bylaws Rev. It was moved by Janet Garrick, seconded by Carolyn Hunt,
(Sections 9300 - to adopt the Board Bylaws Revision (Sections 9300-9350) .
9350) 2nd Reading
and Adoption After discussion and suggested revisions on Sections
9320.B, 9321.B, 9323 .A, it was moved by Sheila Marcus,
seconded by Carolyn Hunt, to adopt Board Bylaws Revision
(Sections 9300-9350) as amended.
AYES: Garrick, Hunt, Marcus, Osterlund
NOES: None
ABSENT: Spurlock
Motion carried.
Master Planning It was moved by Sheila Marcus, seconded by Carolyn Hunt,
Committee Members to approve the appointment of the following employees/
Appointed as community members to the 1990-91 Ocean View School
Amended District Master Planning Committee:
Circle View - Vince Sipkovich
Golden View - Ellyn Hale
Harbour View - Beverly Rau
Oak View - Berta Ramirez
Spring View - Kim Rylander
Sun View - Jim Haley
Village View - Tim Engler
Vista View - To be assigned
GATE - Richard Papini-Chapla
Parent Nancy Stuever spoke on behalf of Ocean View
Parents Council regarding the selection process for
members of the Master Planning Committee and the lack of
District recruitment for all committees.
AYES: Garrick, Hunt, Marcus
NOES: Osterlund
ABSENT: Spurlock
Motion carried.
Coll. Bargaining It was moved by Carolyn Hunt, seconded by Janet Garrick,
Agreement w/CSEA to approve the collective bargaining reopener agreement
Ch. 375 Approved with the California School Employees Association, Chapter
#375, for 1990-91.
Angie Wright, representing the Ocean View Parents
Council, questioned again why salary agreements are not
submitted as information prior to taking action. Ms
Wright stated that once a tentative agreement is reached
the contract should be available for public input and
possible recommendations to the Board.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3•1,51 d
212.14
Ocean View School District
tinutes of the October 23 , 1990 Regular Board Meeting
Page 15
Board Bylaws It was moved by Sheila Marcus, seconded by Carolyn
Revision (Sections Hunt, to adopt the Board Bylaws revision (Sections
9100-9240) 2nd 9100-9240) as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
Reading & Adoption
as Amended
Board Policy It was moved by Sheila Marcus, seconded by Carolyn
Revision: Instruct. Hunt, to adopt the revision to Board Policy -
2nd Reading and Instruction - Sections 6159 - 6173 . Motion carried
Adoption unanimously.
Res. 17:9091: It was moved by Sheila Marcus, seconded by Carolyn
Property Tax Coll. Hunt, to approve Resolution 17:9091 Property Tax
Fee Approved Collection Fee. Motion carried unanimously.
Memberships for It was moved by Sheila Marcus, seconded by Carolyn
Personnel Hunt, to approve Personnel Commission memberships for
Commission 1990-91 the 1990-91 school year to the Cooperative Organization
Approved for the Development of Employee Selection Procedures
(CODESP) at a cost of $1,750.00, and to the California
School Personnel Commissioner's Association (CSPCA) at
a cost of $583 .00, for a total membership cost of
$2333 .00. Motion carried unanimously.
Master Planning It was moved by Sheila Marcus, seconded by Carolyn
Committee Members Hunt, to approve the appointment of the following '
Appointed as employees/community members to the 1990-91 Ocean View
Amended School District Master Planning Committee:
Circle View - To be assigned
College View - Scott Miller
Crest View - Jose Ramirez
Golden View - Lottie Hobbs
Harbour View - To be assigned
Haven View - Carla Hendrick
Hope View - Roger Domercq
Lake View - Dave Force
Marine View - Sally Alvino
Mesa View - Roger Harvey
Oak View - To be assigned
Spring View - To be assigned
Star View - Robert Van Aken
Sun View - To be assigned
Village View - To be assigned
Vista View - To be assigned
Westmont - Susan Tarasut
OVTA - Steve Winders
CSEA - Fran Andrade
GATE - To be assigned
Bilingual - Nancy Nunez
ATTACHMENT NO. e
212.15
Ocean View School District
iinutes of the October 23 , 1990 Regular Board Meeting
Page 16
Master Planning Special Ed - Daniel Jurichko
Committee Members 14 Admin. Staff - Joe Condon
Appointed as - John Thomas
Amended - cont'd.
Joe Condon informed the Board that principals were to
use their parent organizations and school leadership
groups to choose their representative.
Lottie Hobbs, parent, stated concerns regarding: 1)
desired changes in the process as compared to last
year, 2) the Committee's function regarding staff
reconfiguration recommendations, 3) the need for
coordination among the District Integration Advisory
Committee, Caught In The Middle Committee, and the
Master Planning Committee, and 4) the need for timely
communications to parents.
Mr. Mercier, Mr. Condon, and Dr. McMurray responded to
the stated concerns.
Motion carried unanimously.
District Integrat. It was moved by Sheila Marcus, seconded by Carolyn
Adv. Committee Hunt, to approve the appointment of Gina McCullough,
Members Appointed Lake View School representative, and Louise Glenning,
District administrators representative, to the District
Integration Advisory Committee. Motion carried
unanimously.
Members to WOCCSE It was moved by Sheila Marcus, seconded by Carolyn
Community Advisory Hunt, to approve the appointment of Jeanne Paskvan
Comm. Appointed and Michael Moon to the WOCCSE Community Advisory
Board. Motion carried unanimously.
Additions to Study It was moved by Sheila Marcus, seconded by Carolyn
Trip List Approved Hunt, to approve the following additions to the study
trip list:
The Wilshire Theatre, Beverly Hills
Naval Shipyard, San Pedro
Long Beach Convention Center, Long Beach
Motion carried unanimously.
Management/Conf. It was moved by Sheila Marcus, seconded by Carolyn
Salary, Health & Hunt, to approve the 1990-91 salary schedules for
Welfare Benefits - management/confidential personnel and that health
1990-91 Approved and welfare benefits for all management/confidential
s Amended personnel be increased by $500. 00 to $4 , 306.00 for the
1990-91 school year.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3 .21 e
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
DISTRICT ORGANIZATIONAL STUDY
Phase One
Ocean View School District has historically operated as K-6 and K-8
grade schools. The 1987 State Department report on schooling for
young adolescents, "Caught In The Middle, " began reexamination of
our District programs. This study was expanded by the Board_.of
Trustees during Master Planning (Spring, 1990) to include
consideration of alternative organizational patterns.
Three organizational patterns emerged for serious consideration:
K-6 and K-8 schools; K-5 and 6-7-8 schools; K-6 and 7-8 schools.
A District Organizational Study Committee was created in October,
1990 to develop three prototypes which outline "comparative
components" (size, facilities, support, etc. ) of the options.
Orange County average enrollment size of schools reflects data used
by Master Planning last year: grades 6-8/7-8 - 677 students;
grades K-6 - 513 students. This document presents the committee's
work in support of Phase One of the District Organizational Study.
The committee provided the following introduction:
The purpose of this document is to analyze the
characteristics of different configurations depicting the
possible future organizational structure of Ocean View
School District. The.:focus of this report is-the impact
of different configurations on the academic and social
needs of the students. Research and recommendations from
Caught in the Middle, the Carnegie Report and
professional input and experiences of Ocean View staff
members are reflected in these prototypes.
Committee Members:
Bruce Curtis, Linda Hayward, Jane Pade, Lois Hoshijo,
Rusty Foster, Kelly Painter, Bob Vouga, Marilyn Koeller,
Patrick Monahan, Bill Lescher, Gayle Bowles, Janet Reece.
Phase One - District Organizational Study initiates a district-wide
study of our future organizational pattern. Each teacher is asked
to study and participate in efforts to identify the
strengths/weaknesses or advantages/disadvantages of each prototype.
Our purpose is to (1) gather the best thinking of all staff and (2)
involve all teachers in study which will lead to a recommendation
for district organizational pattern.
Following teacher study and response, a summary will be developed
and distributed as part of Phase Two - District Organizational
Study.
December 5, 1990
.ATTACHMENT NO. 3.2$ ,
f
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Superintendent's Office
January 29, 1991
The following meetings have been set to allow sufficient opportunity for
community and staff to become informed and give input prior to Board action
regarding the District integration plan and reconfiguration/closures, if any.,.
School Community Meetings - 7 : 00 p.m.
District Integration Plan:
January 29, 1991 Spring, Circle, College (at Spring)
January 30, 1991 Mesa, Marine, Golden, Hope (at Marine)
January 31, 1991 Harbour, Haven, Village (at Village)
January 31, 1991 Oak. View (at Oak View)
February 21, 1991 - Your Schools will be mailed to ALL residences and
commercial establishments. Topics will include the tentative recommend-
ation for reconfiguration/closures, if any, the schedule of community
meetings, Board Hearing and Action regarding the topic; the recommended
integration plan, plus notice of the official public hearing and Board
action dote (March 5) ; recruitment of Community Budget Committee members
(5 to be appointed by the Board) ; announcement of the appointment of the
Ocean View Education Foundation Directors, etc.
Reconfiguration/Closure, if any - Each K-8 school will host the
meeting for their feeder schools as follows. All meetings will
be held at 7 : 00 p.m. :
March 4 , 1991 Spring
March 4 , 1991 Vista
March 6, 1991 Mesa
March 7 , 1991 Marine
March 7 , 1991 Crest
March 11, 1991 Harbour
District Meetings
January 28, 1991 Integration Advisory Committee - 7:00 p.m. Board Rm.
February 4 , 1991 Master Planning Committee - 7: 00 p.m. Board Room
February 12 , 199 Master Planning Committee - 7:00 p.m. Art Lab
February 13 , 1991 Integration Advisory Committee - 7 :00 p.m. Board Rr►.
February 20, 1991 Master Planning Committee - 7:00 p.m. Art Lab
February 25, 1991 Master Planning Committee - 7 : 00 p.m. Art Lab
Board Meetings
February 5, 1991 Regular Board Meeting at Westmont School - 7:00 p.m.
Public Hearing, on the District
Integration/Conceptual Plan
February 19, 1991 Regular Board Meeting at Westmont School - 7 : 00 p.m.
Superintendent's recommended District Integration
Plan presented as information
ATTACHMEENT NO. 3 21 9
S
February 27 , 1991 Special Board Meeting to study recommendations on
reconfiguration/ closures, if any, to be held in
Board Room 6: 00 p.m. This is a study session for the
Board, public comment will not be solicited;
however, the public is invited to observe.
March 5, 1991 Regular Board Meeting at Westmont School - 7: 00 p.m.
Legally required public hearing on the
Superintendent's recommended District integration
plan (a written document) . Action on the plan is
scheduled for this meeting. Recommendations for
Reconfiguration/Closure, if any, will be presented
as information.
March 12, 1991 Public Hearing on reconfiguration/closure, if any.
Place to be determined, 7:00 p.m.
March 19, 1991 Regular Board Meeting - Action on
Reconfiguration/Closure, if any. Place to be
determined, 7 : 00 p.m.
School Staff and Parent Leadership Meetings
February 26, 1991 Principals meet with school parent leadership and
staff to explain recommendations for
reconfiguration/closures, if any. These
recommendations will be presented at informational
meetings scheduled at K-8 schools February 28
through March 11 (see schedule) .
(fm)
A17ACHMcNT NO. b-3v
February 28, 1991 O"�VML�Dear Parent' IN QUEST OF EXCELLENCE~
In January a Your Schools district publication was mailed to your
residence with information describing critical issues being
addressed this year: District Integration Planning and Master
Planning to include an examination of a reconfiguration of school
grade level patterns and possible school closures. As you recall,
both of these issues are being studied and discussed by the Board
of Trustees, staff, and community advisory committee with
representation from each school.
Six community meetings were held in January to explain the
District's Conceptual Plan for Integration. The plan was submitted
to the Federal Office of Civil Rights for their review and comment
so that we could be assured the plan meets Federal standards. To
date, we have not received a Federal response. Due to this delay,
the scheduled public hearing on the District's integration plan
set for the Tuesday, March 5, 1991, Board meeting has been
postponed. In the interim, alternative plans for integration will
be developed and presented for study to the Integration Advisory
Committee so that, in the event the current conceptual plan does
not meet Federal standards, an alternative plan will be ready for
public comment and Board of Trustees' consideration. We are hopeful
of having an approved plan this spring.
Regarding reconfiguration, staff has completed their study and
determined that it would be instructionally beneficial to change
the school grade level patterns to a K-5, 6-8 configuration. The
master planning committee, with representation from each school,
has reviewed and advised staff regarding the plan. The tentative
staff recommendation includes:
• Designating four middle schools grades 6-8 (Marine View, Mesa
View, Spring View and Vista View) . Enrollments at the middle
schools would range from 635 to 690.
• Ten or eleven schools would be needed to provide programs for
kindergarten through fifth grade students. The K-5 school
enrollments would be in the 500 student range.
(over)
OCEAN VIEW SUPERINTENDENT BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Monte SCHOOL DISTRICT ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENTSy Lottle a yP u an.sioent Clerk
Carolyn Hunt. Member
Joseph Conoon Carol Kanoce. Member
James L.Jones,
Jr. Sheila Marcus. Member
Paul S. Mercier
17200 PINEHURST LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92647
7141841.2531 w..v.An EOWr Opporrr nitY EfnPJQY r
FAX 714/8I7-1430 This rn.o.0 " , h
ATTACHMENT NO. 3I
Letter to Parents
Page 2
• The district currently operates 17 schools. This plan calls
for 14 or 15 schools. Recommendations for school closures
will not be firm until the District Integration Plan is
finalized this spring.
District staff welcomes your *input and observations concerning the
tentative reconfiguration recommendations. Therefore, several
community meetings have been scheduled during which the staff can
present the rationale and program offerings planned for a K-5, 6-
8 configuration. District parents and other community members are
encouraged to attend any of the scheduled meetings. These meetings
are set to begin at 7 : 00 p.m. and are as follows:
Monday, March 4 Vista View, Westmont, Star View, at Vista
View (16250 Hickory Street, Fountain
Valley)
Wednesday, March 6 Mesa View., Golden View, Hope View at Mesa
View (17601 Avilla Lane, Huntington Beach)
Thursday, March 7 Marine View at Marine View (5682 Tilburg
Drive, Huntington Beach)
Monday, March 11 Harbour View, Haven View, Village View at
Harbour View (4343 Pickwick Circle,
Huntington Beach)
Tuesday, March 12 Spring View, Circle, College View, Sun
View at Spring View (16662 Trudy Lane,
Huntington Beach)
Wednesday, March 13 Crest View, Lake View, Oak View at Crest
View (18052 Lisa Lane, Huntington Beach)
Following the community meetings, the staff recommendations will
be finalized and presented to the Board of Trustees as information
at the March 19, 7: 00 p.m. meeting at Westmont School, 8251 Heil
Avenue, Westminster. At that time, public comment to the Board
regarding the recommendations will be welcomed. Action on the
recommendations will be scheduled for April.
Sincerely,
Monte McMurray, Ed.D.
Superintendent
MCM: jm
ATTACHMENT NO. _3Z.
B6 THURSDAY.APRIL 11,1991 HOC LOS ANGELES TIMES norities—the 175-student magnet
program would give enrollment
preferences to Anglo students from
other schools,Supt. Monte McMur-
ray said.
As a result, man students who
Ocean View Plan Wouldlive in the predominantly Latino "The kids will be into rated
.
neighborhood surrounding Oak I g fed
Seek Anglo Students First View could find themselves shut That's the important thing," she
out to make room for magnet
said.
students. And minority students at Ocean View's plan is unanimous-
available elsewhere in the district other schools could also be dis- ly supported by its 35•member Q
■ Desegregation: The couraged from transfering to Oak Integration Advisory Committee, z
starting in September,1992. :I composed of teachers, administra-
proposed magnet,aimed at Paul Mercier, assistant superin- V1e1N tors and parents, Mercier said. F "
tendent for programs, acknowl- Latino parents and activists con- Three desegregation consultants to .�
drawing whites so that the + Y the district have also endorsed the I.l.1
edged that the voluntary magnet .. tacled Wednesday Here hesitant to
district -AV qualify for program could be discriminatory, i comment on the new desegrega- plan,he said. �
federal funds, may be in that it would chiefly attempt to ' tion plan until more details are State officials and desegregation
y draw Anglo students and enable , made public during the coming 'experts said that similar ethnically
inherently discriminatory. the district to qualify for federal weeks. based,voluntary magnet programs
desegregation funds. District officials aborted their have become increasingly popular
"We have to keep in mind what I original desegregation plan be- among school districts across the
By JOHN PENNER the purpose of this program is," cause the federal Department of nation as an alternative to manda- <
SPECIAL 10 THE TIMES Mercier said. "The purpose is to Education Office of Civil Rights tory integration plans. In Califor-
HUNTINGTON BEACH—Frus- attract white students to Oak , ---has yet to approve the proposal. nia, about eight of every 10 school
trated over their progress in cor- View." Oak View teacher Anita Garcia districts with desegregation plans
recting radal imbalances, officials District officials and national de- Lachenmeyer said she believes use the magnet concept, said Edd
of the Ocean View School District segregation experts say the pro- neighborhood parents will favor Fong, press secretary to State
have proposed a desegregation posal's benefits—moving toward the new plan over previous district Controller Gray Davis. -
plan that they admit could be districtwide integration while of- `) desegregation efforts. A series of community meetings
inherently discriminatory against fering attractive new programs on the new desegregation plan are
Latinos and other minorities. such as art, drama, music and -! I "They have a concern about
-I their children being bused, and scheduled next week, beginning
The plan that administrators industrial arts at a mainly Latino i the want to have their neighbor-. anwith one planned for 7 p.m. Mon-
presented to the Board of Trustees school—outweigh its drawbacks. i hood wantschoq,'have their er aid. day at Crest View.
on Tuesday night calls for creating While the new elective courses i
an elective-based "magnet" pro- would be offered to all Oak View . The new proposal would also _
gram at Oak View Elementary students-89% of whom are mi- close Crest View Elementary
School that would offer classes not Please see OCEAN VIEW,B6 / � School, where minorities make up or WARNER AVE
67% of the enrollment, and trans-
fer the students to nearby schools. I y o
The plan would then transfer 240 < SLATER AVE m
of, Oak View's 660 students to 0
neighboring schools by redrawing z o NICHOLS
T
ST
the school's boundary. ]t'would W o CD
an open-enrollment policy o W
for Oak View students, providing ' "' o OAK VIEW
trinsportation for any who wish to �, ELEMENTARY
attend another district school. Chka EUIS
Kim Lam. another Oak View suds r HUNTINGTON
teacher and the school's Vietnam- q;; '� BEACH 1,c2
ese liaison to the district Integra- �
Lion Advisory Committee, said she .�� ORANGE GARFIELD
backs the new proposal. Although COUNTY AVE
it would initially limit minority .Ar" 1, YORKTOWN
students outside Oak View from deLllod • AVE
entering the magnet program, she
said she is confident the plan will t .,^� ADAMS
exa ' to accommodate a wider y~ AVE
crow..-section of students.
Ocean View School District
Modified Conceptual Plan For District Integration
Isolated
*Oak View(89%)C
O
Criteria to Determine E rest View-7/8(67%)
Racial Isolation In danger of isolation (K-6)
30% (± 20%)
• Lake View(39%) e Marine View(13%)
• Star View(44%) 0 Mesa View(13%)
QHope View(13%)
.................
DESEGREGATION PLAN
..........
OAK VIEW
EXPANDED
ATTENDANCE
HOME '
ASSESSMENT
ZONES
REGISTRATION SCHOOL
]
-5/6 CENTER Grades K benefit
Schools that would
il from increased minority
enrollment:
VOLUNTARY
TRANSFER
Transfers that benefit COLLEGE
* GOLDEN
minority enrollment
HARBOUR
HOPE
MAGNET PROGRAMS • MARINE
MESA Will enhanci racial composition W •
Xx. K.K...
. .............
of school:
• A
"PREPPIE MAGNET" "ENRICHMENT MAGNET'
Grade K Grades 1 -5/6
. . ... ... . . ..
x ......
CREST VIEW- 7/8 LAKE VIEW STAR VIEW
1 Reassign Oak 7 8 students Determined to be,X Presently in danger
in dang to other site(s) to avoid er of racial of racial isolation."
racial isolation. isolation." would be Establishment of a
2. Determine assignment of neutralized by MAGNET SCHOOL
Crest 7/8 students. combining Crest View or PROGRAM
3 Combine Crest and Lake K -6 population. (science/math/
View K-6 populations to technology) would
effect more positive racial enhance racial
balance. Using the concept composition of the
of EQUITY, move Crest school.
K-6 to Lake View.
------,-77777777. ...........
............ OPEN ENROLLMENT
Policy and practices are required to benefit desegregation.
A]-IAUHMtN I Nu.
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
PLAN
FOR
INTEGRATION
DECEMBER 1991
Educational Services
ATTACHMENT N0. �.-
CONTENTS
Page No.
Preface. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
Acknowledgement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
I. Desegregation - District Policy Guidelines
A. Policy Statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1
B. Community Involvement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-3
C. Identification of Segregated Schools. . . . D-4
D. Method(s) to Implement Desegregation. . . . D-5
E. Integration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-6
II. Voluntary Integration Plan
A. District Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IP-1
B. Overview of Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IP-3
C. Boundary Realignment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IP-5
D. Program Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IP-6
E. Multicultural Programs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IP-13
F. Staff Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IP-15
G. Community Education. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IP-17
H. Evaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IP-18
ii
ATTACHMENT NO. 3.31
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Ocean View School District acknowledges the contributions of the
Integration Advisory Committee in providing valuable advice in the
development of this Voluntary Integration Plan.
Frances Andrade Bill Lescher
Gayle Bowles Elaine Livingston
Joan Buffehr Irene Lopez
Laurie Cable Yolanda Martinez
Jessie Cabrera Maureen Mirjahangir
Karen Colby Frank Nakase
Margaret Edey Gloria Nunez
Tina Fernandez Carol Parrish
David Force Joann Phillips
Bill Fowler Irene Ramirez
Julie Franz Kathleen Riddell
Louise Glenning Susan Robin
Carla Hendrick Cecile Sandeen
Gerri Hirschberg Antonio Sarinana
Kim Lam Nancy Stuever
Jan Leight Deborah Wilson
iv
ATTACHMENT NO. 3.3�
A. POLICY STATEMENT
The Ocean Yew School District, through its Board of Trustees, maintains a policy to provide
equal educational opportunities to all students regardless of race, religion, ethnicity or sex. It
is also the policy of the District to encourage programs of multicultural education which are
based upon the belief that the education of all students is enhanced when students of diverse
racial and ethnic cultural backgrounds are perceived as valuable educational resources.
The District supports the ruling of the California Supreme Court and affirms irms the State Board of
Education's declaration, 'that school districts have a legal and educational obligation to take
reasonably feasible steps to alleviate the racial and ethnic segregation of its minority students,
whatever its origin, because of the educational harm and deprivation it causes such students.
The state Board also finds that California school districts should proceed to implement this legal
and educational obligation without the necessity of protracted and expensive court proceedings.
Declaration
The Ocean View School District Board of Trustees declares that any discrimination on the basis
of race, religion, creed, color, national origin or ancestry will not be tolerated. The Board of
Trustees believes that equality of opportunity in the total community for all ethnic groups is a
desirable goal for our society. Therefore, the Board establishes a formal policy of providing
equal educational opportunity for all pupils regardless of racial or socioeconomic background.
The Board recognizes an obligation to act positively within the framework of its
educational responsibilities and will:
(A) Initiate actions and programs designed to maintain
a'position of leadership in the elimination of
segregation or discrimination in such matters as
school site selection, attendance areas and
practices; student discipline; educational
counseling; teacher placement, transfer, and
promotion; and any other matter affecting equal
educational opportunity.
(B) By reaffirming present policy that no employee shall
be denied a position in any school or office nor be
denied the full employee benefits applicable to any
school office or position including, but not limited
to,promotion and transfer opportunities, on account
of race, religious creed, color or national origin,
nor shall any employee be compelled to serve in any
position, office, school or capacity on account of
his race, religious creed, color or national origin.
D-1
ATTACHMENT NO. 3•�I
B. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
The Board of Trustees shall involve parents, teachers and other community representatives in
all stages of identifying the need for a plan (Identification of Segregated Schools) and in the
development and implementation of a District Plan for Desegregation/Integration.
It is essential that teachers, parents, and others in the community understand and support not
only the constitutional mandate behind the regulations but also the educational and social
benefits of integration.
A District Integration Advisory Committee shall be convened and should be composed of a
substantial percentage of minority group persons. This committee is subject to the rules and
regulations of the local Board. The Board of Trustees should specify the duties and limitations
of the Advisory Committee in writing and'might include the following:
(1) Reason and need for the Advisory Committee.
(2) The role of the committee as advisory;the committee cannot diminish
or augment the responsibilities of the Board.
(3) The time frame to complete work and the manner in which the
committee is to communicate with the Board; issues to consider.
Technical aspects of planning such as compiling data, preparing background information, and
other planning activities related to the details of educational programs and personnel
considerations, should be the responsibility of the District staff.
Further, whether community support is or is not achieved, the Board is responsible for carrying
out its constitutional duty.
D-3
ATTACHMENT NO. 3.13
C. IDENTIFICATION OF
SEGREGATED SCHOOLS
Introduction
The governing board of each school district in California should monitor the racial composition
of its schools and identify any school within the district that is in danger, or has become racially
or ethnically segregated.
District Policy
The repeal of regulations eliminated speck State procedures and requirements for identifying
segregated schools. District-developed guidelines should establish a procedure for examining
school racial compositions and, when necessary, initiate a process to develop and enact
reasonable and feasible interventions.
(1) In November and February of each year, the District will examine the
minority composition of all schools/grade organizational patterns(K-6,
7-8).
(2) When a school's minority enrollment exceeds fifty percent (SO%), the
District must begin to explore reasonable and feasible interventions to
minimize racial isolation, and as appropriate, begin to enact
interventions which can avoid creation of a racially isolated school.
(3) Should any school exceed seventy percent (70%)minority composition,
it is racially isolated and the District must have enacted interventions
which are determined to be reasonable and feasible to minimize racial
isolation and, must annually review the interventions as to their
appropriateness and effectiveness.
Following the reporting of CBEDS data, but by no later than January of each school year,
district staff shall report the racial composition of student populations by school to the Board
of Trustees.
D-4
ATTACHMENT NO. � 4s-
11 E. INTEGRATION
The goals of integration go beyond achieving a racial/ethnic balance in the composition of
students, but seek the social integration of all of its staff and its children and their families into
the social and intellectual life of the school.
An integrated school is one in which the children have acquired an understanding and respect
for the history, cultural heritage, and contributions of all ethnic groups so that there is mutual
respect in cultural sharing It is a school in which children of all ethnic groups not only have
an opportunity to acquire the knowledge, skills, and behaviors necessary to participate in the
mainstream of American life, but also have acquired that knowledge, those skills, and those
behavior patterns.
Goals of Integration
Self concepts and attitudes towards school and learning shall become equally
positive in students of all racial, ethnic, and cultural groups and of both sexes.
To achieve maximum academic achievement of all students from all ethnic groups.
Multiethnic/multicultural activities shall be developed in which curriculum
materials, teacher attitudes and teaching procedures provide each child with an
opportunity to understand and to develop pride in his own ethnic heritage and to
understand and respect the ethnic heritage of other groups in the classroom and
in American society.
Educators of diverse racial, ethnic, and cultural groups and of both sexes shall
be integrated throughout the staff`'of the school. Opportunity for advancement
shall be open to all equally. Educators from all groups shall be recruited and
have status at all levels.
tudents of both sexes and of all racial, ethnic and cultural groups shall be
integrated into the social system of the school. Children of all groups shall
perceive each other as peers and friends.
Parents of children of all groups shall be integrated into the life of the school.
They shall hold comparable status and have comparable roles in school-related
organizations and activities.
D-6
ATTACHMENT NO. ��
A. DISTRICT SUMMARY
The Community Integration Advisory Committee applied the proposed
criteria for identification of racially isolated schools to all
schools in the District. The overall District minority percentage
for 1991-1992 is thirty-one percent (31%) , an increase of one
percent (1%) from last year.
Oak View School (K-6) and Crest View (7-8) program are determined
to be racially isolated.
Lake View School (K-6) with a forty-four percent (44%) minority
population, an increase of five percent (5%) over last year, is the
only other school approaching a minority enrollment requiring a
necessary intervention.
The following chart indicates the percentage of minority students
from greatest percentage to least.
School (K-6) 1991-1992 1990-1991 1989-90
Oak View 92 89 86
Lake View 44 39 35
Star View 39 44 46
Golden View 36* (inc. Oak 27*(inc. Oak 15
transfer) transfer)
Sun View 35 30 22
Westmont 34 33 27
Crest View 33 25 24
OCEAN VIEW ----31---- 30 28
Spring View 29 34 30
Vista View 29 26 26
Hope View 25* (inc. Oak 13 9
transfer)
Circle View 22*(inc. GATE) 22* (inc. GATE) 18
Haven View 22 22 10
College View 21 18 17
Village View 18 19 20
Harbour View 18 20 16
Mesa View 16 12 16
Marine View 12 13 13
IP-1
ATTACHMENT NO. 3• j`
B. OVERVIEW OF PLAN
Introduction
Based on the District criteria, Oak View (K-6) and Crest View (7-8
grade program) continue to be racially isolated. The Integration
Advisory Committee explored reasonable and feasible steps to
minimize racial isolation while developing the original District
Plan for Integration (May, 1991) and reconsidered those components
in October and November, 1991.
Following additional study, the Integration Advisory Committee
recommends the District enact these positive interventions at Oak
View, which are reasonable and feasible for the 1992-93 school
year:
(a) Realign Oak View attendance boundaries to create improved
integration at neighboring schools.
(b) Establish a transfer program with transportation to
encourage students attending a school in which their race
is in the majority to attend a school of their choice
where their race is in the minority (M-to-M) , and revise
Open Enrollment policy to benefit integration.
(c) Provide additional compensatory services at Oak View.
The Integration Advisory Committee also analyzed whether the Magnet
Program, as previously recommended, was a reasonable and feasible
component for the District for the 1992-93 school year. They
summarized:
(a) The Committee supports the concept of a Magnet Program,
even though there was perceived mixed community support.
(b) Implementing the Magnet Program creates a significant
impact on the District budget at a time when funding is
limited and programs have been cut back. District funds
required to support a Magnet Program of 200 students
could be allocated to other needs impacting more
children.
(c) Placing the Magnet Program at Oak View displaces more
home school students, creating an increased impact on
minority students.
(d) With a Magnet Program, Oak View is under enrolled and
below district target enrollments.
(e) White students can still be recruited to Oak View with
special program benefits, but without a magnet program.
Following additional study, the Integration Advisory Committee
supports the original recommendation to reassign Crest View
seventh/eighth grade students to other schools to improve
integration at all middle schools for the 1992-93 school year.
These recommended interventions and the analysis of the Magnet
Program were considered in revising the Plan for Integration.
IP-3
ATTACHMENT NO. 3 .51
C. BOUNDARY REALIGNMENT
Desegregation/integration recommendations are intended to reduce
racial isolation across the District. In California, school
districts are under a constitutional mandate to take reasonably
feasible steps to alleviate racial and ethnic segregation of
minority students. Both federal and state courts have repeatedly
emphasized that the constitutional evil to be eliminated is the
existence of segregated schools. This does not require the
achievement of a particular racial "mix" or "balance" ' in each
school.
District guidelines for the identification of segregated schools
must be adhered to in the establishment of school attendance
boundaries. School attendance boundaries would be consistent with
the District Integration Plan where (1) schools that would benefit
from increased minority enrollment receive students from the Oak
View attendance area, and (2) the home school attendance area for
Oak View School is limited.
IP-5
ATTACHMENT NO. 3 5?
Program Description - cont.
LEP STUDENT PROGRAM SERVICES AT SCHOOLS WITH EXPANDED ATTENDANCE
20NES K - 5/6
LEP student program services will be offered for students in grades
1 through 5 or 6 who would normally attend Oak View School but are
now attending schools which would benefit from increased minority
enrollment: College View, Harbour View, Golden View, Hope View,
Marine View or Mesa View, depending on recommendations of the
Master Planning Committee.
The goals of the LEP student program services are:
1) To provide continued intensive English language development
(ESL) for students, focusing on oral English followed
by emphasis on English reading and writing skills.
2) To provide students with the opportunity to access the core
curriculum through sheltered content classes and bilingual
support.
3) To serve as a bridge between "sheltered" classes and
regular English-only classes. Students will develop skills
and demonstrate proficiency in English so they may be
redesignated from limited English proficient (LEP) to
fluent English proficient (FEP) .
Curriculum and instruction in the LEP student classes will focus on
continued intensive English language development skills based on
the student's placement on the ESL continuum, appropriate grade
level content classes "sheltered" to meet the academic needs of LEP
students, and bilingual support for the core curriculum. Extra
emphasis will be placed on strengthening the student"s writing
skills.
Students receiving these program services will be heterogeneously
grouped by grade level for most of the school day. During the
language arts block of time students identified as limited English
proficient will go to non-graded classes, based on their English
proficiency level, where they will receive instruction in English
language development--both oral and written. During the remainder
of the day, LEP students will join classmates in integrated
programs appropriate for their grade level.
Teachers in the schools with expanded attendance zones will have
their Language Development Specialist certificates (LDS) and/or
their bilingual credential or certificate of competency (BCC) .
They will be paired with bilingual instructional aides. Class size
will be approximately one teacher for every 25 students needing
English language development.
The actual program on each campus will be jointly developed by the
existing school staff and the LEP student program staff to best
meet the needs of all students on the campus.
IP-7
ATTACHMENT CIO. 3.55
Program Description - cont.
NEWCOMER AND LEP STUDENT PROGRAMS AT 6-7-8 GRADE SCHOOLS
■ Newcomer class (might be combined with 7/8 depending on
numbers) would be formed at all schools
■ Students would be integrated with other 6-7-8th graders for
P.E. , exploratory, electives
■ Teacher with LDS plus bilingual aide(s)
■ Teacher/student ratio = 1:25
■ Students may enter at any time and exit at semester
■ Curriculum is intense ESL with Spanish or Vietnamese
bilingual support for academic areas
■ Students are clustered together for integrated core
curriculum - Reading/History/Literature and Social Science
LEP STUDENT CLASSES FOR GRADES 7-8
■ LEP student class or classes - will be formed for grades 7/8 or
7 or 8 depending on numbers. Classes will include:
sheltered math
sheltered social science
sheltered science
■ Students will be integrated with exploratory, QUEST, P.E. , etc.
■ Bilingual aides follow kids
■ All schools will have this program
■ Students should have access to computer language lab
on a daily basis
LEP STUDENT CLASSES FOR GRADE 6
■ Assigned to self-contained classrooms - clustered for language
development based on tested English language proficiency
■ Teachers with LDS or in training paired with bilingual aides
■ Integrated for most of the day
■ Bilingual support provided when necessary
IP-9
ATTACHMcNT NO. 3 5�
Program Description - cont.
Economic Impact Aid (EIA) :
State Compensatory Education (SCE)
Limited English Proficient (LEP)
Economic Impact Aid funds, the states equivalent of federal
Chapter I funds, are allocated to districts statewide. This
districtwide allocation is designated for two student
populations: compensatory education (SCE) and limited English
proficient students (LEP) .
EIA:SCE funds are combined with Chapter I funds and allocated to
schools having the highest concentrations of low-income students.
The same requirements governing Chapter I schools and program
services apply to EIA:SCE schools and program services.
EIA:LEP funds are allocated for the support of students who are
designated Limited English Proficient (LEP) and required
additional language support services. Funding for these students
is a function of language status, not of the school of
attendance. Therefore, EIA:LEP funds will continue throughout
implementation of the Voluntary Integration Plan to support LEP
students.
IP-11
ATTACHMENT NO. 3•s�
E. MULTICULTURAL PROGRAMS
Because all students will be impacted at many of the schools with
the proposed integration plan, student programs will focus on
multi-cultural differences and similarities. All programs will be
developed and implemented consistent with various state curriculum
frameworks, including, but not limited to the History-Social
Science Framework, Foreign Language Framework, Health Education
Framework, as well as the State's Bilingual Handbook. Successful
programs in other districts will be studied and replicated or
modified as necessary. Several outstanding programs have been
developed for students and used successfully in classrooms around
the county:
■ "Green Circle" is a K-3 program which teaches young students
how to form friendship groups.
■ For upper grade (4-8) students, "Conflict Manager" deals
with student listening, problem-solving, decision making and
leadership skills.
Both programs have been highly recommended by Tina Fernandez from
the Orange County Human Relations Commission. Teachers will be
provided with inservice training, teachers' manuals and
instructional materials to support these programs.
■ "A World of Difference" will continue to be used with students
in grades 5-8 and many staffs have already been trained to
facilitate the program.
■ Working with the "YES! Project" sponsored by the Orange County
Department of Education, teachers will learn how to
incorporate gang and drug prevention issues into current
academic lessons. With this program, students will be involved
in cooperative learning activities, and developing critical
thinking skills as they learn positive alternatives to
drug/gang involvement.
In addition to commercially produced student programs which will
involve extensive staff development on the part of teachers and
support staff, orientation for students will involve local
activities generated at each campus such as:
classroom penpals
class/school visitations
class video "news" programs
joint field trips
joint assemblies.
IP-13
A17ACH +ENT NO. 2 •
F. STAFF DEVELOPMENT
Staff development for certificated and classified personnel will
continue to be a focus of the District especially in light of
working with limited English proficient students as well as
students from different cultures. Inservice training will be
directed to the attitudes and understandings of the staff as well
as to the technical educational skills needed to teach and work
with pupils of diverse racial and ethnic groups. The assessment of
school staff needs with reference to information, attitudes and
instructional skills regarding equality of educational opportunity,
and the district goals and objectives of integrated education, will
form the basis for specific objectives and activities of inservice
training.
Ocean View will continue to work with educational consultants from
the California Department of Education, the Orange County
Department of Education, and the County of Orange Human Relations
Commission in planning and providing staff development activities.
Specialists in "Anti-Bias Curriculum" from Pacific Oaks College
will also be utilized by District staff.
In addition to training staff in facilitating student programs such
as "Green Circle, " "Conflict Manager, " "A World of Difference" and
"YES! Project, " staff development activities will feature teaching
strategies appropriate for LEP students.
Teachers at sites with expanded attendance zones will be expected
to participate in staff development programs that teach:
■ The natural progression of language development
■ How to use patterned sentences
■ How to use reinforcement activities in the classroom
to constantly review learned vocabulary
■ How to modify everyday lessons to make them appropriate
for LEP students
■ Sheltered English Techniques
■ How to find the time to plan lessons that help LEP
students access the curriculum
■ How to schedule a small amount of time each day to work
with LEP students
■ How to effectively use a bilingual aide to assist students
in understanding the curriculum in their dominant language
so they can work with these concepts in English
IP-15
ATTACHMENT Nfl.3
G. COMMUNITY EDUCATION
A key component of the District Integration Plan is parent and
community education. Activities involving parents (and their
students when appropriate) will be ongoing. Translators will be
available at meetings and workshops and parents will be able to
decide focus areas for the sessions. The District's Integration
Advisory Committee and Bilingual Advisory Committee, as well as the
local School Site Councils and PTO/PTA groups will be of
considerable importance in developing and implementing specific
activities relating to the goals of integrated education.
Parents and community members will be able to participate in multi-
ethnic programs which encourage students and their families to
develop pride in their own ethnic heritage while gaining a better
understanding and respect for the heritage of other groups which
comprise the classroom, the school and American society.
Possible topics for parent and community education include:
■ How to help your child at home
■ Developing good study habits for children
■ Health and safety issues
■ Celebrating our diverse population
■ Holiday activities to celebrate our diverse ethnicity
■ Teaching young children to resist bias
• Learning about cultural differences and similarities
■ Learning to resist stereotyping and discriminating behavior
■ Topics of concern about the local school: School tour,
understanding the report card, overview of the curriculum,
meeting the school personnel
A major thrust of parent education will be to involve leadership
teams from the transfer receiving sites and the Oak View community.
Activities will be planned to help the two groups become acquainted
and enable them to form one "combined" leadership team.
It is recommended that a bilingual community liaison be hired for
each school with an expanded attendance zone to assist parents new
to the school, to facilitate communication between parents and
teachers, to help transport students who become ill or who miss the
bus and to help the office staff communicate with parents. This
person will play a key role in the transition of students (and
their parents) to the new site.
IP-17
ATTACHMENT NO. 3�5�
Evaluation - cont.
Parents
The opinions and concerns of parents as to the success of the
integration plan will be of major consideration. A Districtwide
instrument will be developed to elicit parental comments. This
evaluation tool will be mailed to a random sample of parents and
data will be collected and compiled by an independent agency.
Informal evaluations will continue on an ongoing basis as well.
Impacted schools will also have School Bilingual Advisory
Committees who may generate parent surveys about program offerings.
One such survey is currently in use at some schools and has been
translated into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Supporting the evaluation process for parents will be the
District's Integration Advisory Committee and Bilingual Advisory
Committee who will be instrumental in designing the survey to be
used with parents. The Integration Advisory Committee may also be
included in data collection and compilation.
Integration is not a static condition, but is an evolving, dynamic
process which is constantly emerging and requires continued
monitoring. Continuing evaluation is needed to determine whether
the programs are achieving the goals of integration.
IP-119
ATTACHMENT NO. _3 1
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Huntington Beach, California
October 20, 1992
TO: The Board of Trustees
FROM: James R. Tarwater, Ed.D. , District Superintendent
SUBJECT: REAL ESTATE PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
On April 7, 1992, the Board of Trustees established the Real
Property Asset Management Advisory Committee to examine the methods
of meeting the short and long-term financial needs of the district.
This examination required the Committee to identify all property
and make site recommendations.
On July 21, 1992, the Board of Trustees held a study session where
the representative, Max Sudakow, from the Real Property Asset
Management Advisory Committee made a presentation to the Board
regarding the district's properties.
CURRENT CONSIDERATIONS:
The Board of Trustees appointed the following members to the Real
Property Asset Management Advisory Committee:
Myrtle Blair
Ralph Bauer
Ruth Baily
Roger Domercq
Irene Ramirez
Max Sudakow
Phil Urabe
James Righeimer
Dan Brenan
Dick Godino
Jim Jones
The purpose of this Committee was to present to the Board of
Trustees a Real Property Asset Management Plan (Exhibit A) . The
Ocean View School District is in a unique position in that it has
excess school sites that could provide necessary additional income.
The Real Property Asset Management Committee made the following
site recommendations:
1) Convert 5 sites to income-producing property in the near
term - Rancho View, Crest View, Park View, Haven View and
Glen View.
ATTACHMENT No. 3=-.,
Q \r
Ocean View School District
Real
Management P
Real Property Asset Management Advisory
Committee
July 21, 1992
EXHIBIT A (Page 1 of 27)ATTACHMENT NO. 3,
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
BACKGROUND
At its meeting of April 7, 1992, The Board of Trustees of the Ocean
View School District established the Real Property Asset Management
Committee, and appointed the following members to that committee:
Myrtle Blair Registered Nurse and former Master
Plan Committee member
Ralph Bauer Former Board Member and retiree
Ruth Baily Public Affairs Consultant and former
Mayor of Huntington Beach
Roger Domercq Real Property investment, and former
Master Plan Committee member
Irene Ramirez Integration Committee member and
realtor/banker
Max Sudakow Former Board member and former Master
Plan Committee member
Phil Urabe School District Business Manager and
parent
James Righeimer Past President, Huntington Beach/
Fountain Valley Board of Realtors
Dan Brenan Director of Real Estate Services
for the city of Huntington Beach
Dick Godino Real Property consultant for the
District
Jim Jones Assistant Superintendent, Business
Services
EXHIBIT A (Pager 3 of 27) MACHMENT NO. 3•�l�J
All excess school sites were reviewed and analyzed with respect to
income potential and future needs of the District. From this
analysis, there are five sites that are candidates for immediate
transformation to income generation, and/or sequenced for near term
conversion. There are two sites that are candidates for
partitioning where some of the property could be used for the
generation of income and/or alternative usage after determination
of other factors which affect the sites. Two school sites and the
Bolsa Chica site are to be held, with the school sites to be used
for enrollment expansion and the Bolsa Chica site for clarification
of overall area usage. The specific sites, with the analysis and
recommendation, are presented in the section of this report on Site
Recommendations.
The committee recognizes that the District is not an independent
entity in converting real property from school sites to income
producers, and that extensive negotiations with the city of
Huntington Beach will have to be accomplished. As part of the
overall Asset Management Plan, these negotiations must be begun at
the earliest time, and they should include all sites that the
District has. This overall approach will establish a coordinated
plan and allow for a positive "give and take" with the city to
maximize the needs of the District. In addition to negotiations
with the city, the District should organize a meeting with the
neighbors of candidate sites to determine the potential resistance
that might be encountered there, and should discuss plans with
property owners associations.
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NON-PROFIT CORPORATION
It is an integral part of the recommendations of the Committee that
the Board of Trustees of the Ocean View School District establish
a Non-Profit Corporation for the purposes of maximizing the
financial return from the conversion of the surplus properties to
income producing from school site usage, and for providing a
disciplined management structure for the disbursement of the
proceeds, interest and earnings derived from the conversion of the
school sites. Since it will take up to six to eight months to
establish the Non-Profit Corporation, the Committee recommends that
action be taken immediately to begin the formation. Further, the
Committee recognizes that the formation of a Non-Profit Corporation
must consider the State Education Code, the IRS Code and general
law; and that the operations of the Non-Profit Corporation must not
violate any State or Federal law or create a "taxable event" for
the Corporation or the District. Therefore the Committee strongly
recommends that the structure and the by-laws of the Non-Profit
Corporation are correctly constructed.
To meet the goals of the Non-Profit Corporation in the management
of the real property assets of the District, the Committee strongly
recommends that the following provisions be included in the Charter
of the Non-Profit Corporation:
1. The Board of Directors of the Non-Profit Corporation
should be no fewer than three and no more than seven.
EXHIBIT A (Page 5 of 27) ATTACHMENT NO. 5.1
SITE RECOMMENDATIONS
In reviewing the excess school sites collectively and individually,
the committee recommends that five sites be converted to income
producing properties in the near term. These sites are: Rancho
View (which is currently in negotiations) , Crest View, Park View,
Haven View, and Glen View. Robinwood and Lark View are candidates
for partial conversion and/or alternative usage predicated on
additional determinations; and, two sites, Meadow View and Pleasant
View be maintained by the District for future school site usage.
The Bolsa Chica site should be held by the District until there is
greater clarification of the development of the surrounding
properties. Further, the committee recommends that a determination
of the feasibility of partial build outs be made for property
associated with or part of Westmont and Harbour View. Details on
a site by site basis of the analysis and recommendations are
provided below.
1. Rancho view
■ Analysis:
This site has been offered and is in the process of being
leased. There is a hold due to the clean up requirements
resulting from the leaking fuel tank, but this is all but
completed. To the District, this site has no future usage
other than to generate an income.
■ Recommendation:
Move immediately to complete the clean-up, and intensively
pursue the ground lease of the property to either the
current lessee or an alternative lessee.
2. Crest view
• Analysis:
The location of the site is on the South and East border
of the District, and thus not a good candidate for future
school site usage. The site is also in a desirable
location for possible commercial usage in concert with
property on Beach Boulevard, as well as multifamily use.
It is felt that this site will be desirable by developers
and will provide a good yield to OVSD.
■ Recommendation:
Convert the property to income producing from a school
site immediately.
EXHIBIT A (Page 7 of 27)
ATTACHMENT NO. 3.15 ,
6. Robinwood
■ Analysis:
With the ground lease of Rancho View, there is a need to
relocate the District Bus Maintenance and Storage facility.
Robinwood is viable for this usage, but is also a good
candidate for conversion to an income producer. With the
adjacent commercial property and the possibility of
building homes on the site, it may be a candidate for total
or partial conversion.
■ Recommendation:
Before action on this site, a search should be made for a
Bus Maintenance and Storage facility for the District.
This action should be accomplished immediately. In the
event that such a facility cannot be obtained, the
Robinwood site, or a part of the site should be- converted
to this usage. The remainder of the site may be used for
school type rental if a better agreement can be reached
with the current tenant or another tenant of this (college)
type, or it can be converted to income producing use. If
another facility for the busses can be obtained, the site
should be converted to income producing and not maintained
for school site use. (This would be a phase three action,
and an intensive effort should be made to generate a better
rental profit from the tenant by entering a longer term
agreement, or by other means. )
7. Lark View
■ Analysis: ,
This site is currently the District Office. The adjacent
land is not being utilized by the District for other than
park land. This land could be converted to income
producing without disrupting the current District usage of
the facility.
■ Recommendation:
Study a conversion to income producing of the land adjacent
to the current facility. Special care must be taken in the
partitioning of the land so that if the District Offices
are ever moved, the land currently occupied by these
District Office buildings can be incorporated into the
conversion project. (An overall plan over two conversion
phases for this land is recommended. ) If the additional
land can be successfully partitioned, conversion of this
property to income producing should be accomplished in
phase three of the overall District property plan.
EXHIBIT A (Page 9 of 27)
ATTACHMENT NO. 3.17
li. Other
■ Analysis:
There is a section of land associated with the Westmont
site that is not perceived to be necessary for the school.
This land could be sold to the developers of the adjacent
shopping center for an addition to the shopping center. ,
There is also the alternative of the District acquiring
land from the shopping center that would give the District
Beach Boulevard frontage. This parcel could then be ground
leased.
Harbour View has extensive land. Some portion of this
property could be sold off for development.
■ Recommendation:
Pursue investigation of selling this parcel to the shopping
center developers, or procuring the additional Beach
Boulevard frontage property. Negotiate with the City of
Westminster for this alternative.
Investigate the need and potential return from converting
a portion of the Harbour View excess property to income
producing usage.
CONCLUSION
The Real Property Asset Management Advisory Committee has made the
recommendations contained in this report for the sole purpose of
assuring the present and future use of the Ocean View School
District funds from its excess real property are properly and
efficiently used.
EXHIBIT A (Page 11 of 27) ATTACHMENT NO. 3.�C,
CHRONOLOGY OF DISCUSSIONS AND ACTIONS REGARDING
OVSD ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
September 7, 1993
7-9-92 Discussion regarding the need for a Board Study Session on
July 21, 1992 , to review recommendations of the Real Property
Asset Management Advisory Committee (Exhibit A, p. 15)
7-21-92 Real Property Asset Management Advisory Committee Report to
the Board (Exhibit A, p. 16)
8-11-92 The Board established as one of its fiscal management goals
the development of a Real Property Asset Management system
(Exhibit A, p. 17)
10-20-92 The Board conducted a Study Session on the Real Property Asset
Management plan with Mr. Dick Godino. Included in the discus-
sion was the use of foundations and a request to review other
District's foundation configurations. (Exhibit A, p. 18)
1-11-93 The Board conducted a Study Session regarding the proposed
Bolsa Chica Development and short and long range asset
management planning needs. In attendance were CSA
representatives Geoff Teale and John Hutt; Greg Cizek, Koll
Co. ; and, Jayna Morgan, STA. (Exhibit A, p. 19)
2-2-93 The Board reviewed current lease agreements and recommended a
Board Study Session to provide direction to the
administration. (Exhibit A, p.20)
2-9-93 Real Property Asset Management Study Session was held which
provided direction as presented in the attached Excerpt of
Board Minutes. (Exhibit A, p. 21-23)
3-8-93 A Board Study Session was conducted regarding the Asset
Management Plan which resulted in the following action:
Approved short and long term leases regarding the District
real property assets, and initiated discussion on a long term
ground lease at Crest View School. (Exhibit A, p. 24)
7-13-93 Declared the Crest View site as surplus and directed
administration to commence the process for selection of a
developer on this property; directed administration and the
District's property consultant to immediately begin
discussions with the City regarding all District properties
with particular emphasis on Crest View and Rancho View; and,
directed the Superintendent to prepare a timeline for
presentation to the Board addressing Item No. 5, page 3, of
the 7/13/93 Agenda. (Exhibit A, p. 25)
EXHIBIT A (Page 13 of 27)
ATTACKMEEN ! 'N .� �
n
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Suoen ^c_ James R. Tarwater. Ed.D. =� C° =°-= Lotue M.Hobbs. President
Charles Ostertund.Clerk
Carol .Member
Kahan
Tracy Penman.Member
LNancy Stuever.Member
-IN OUEST 17200 PINEHURST LANE • HUNTINGTON BEACH • CALIFORNIA • 926.17 • 714 847-2551 • FAX 714 847-1430
OF EXCELLENCE- we are An Equal Opportunity Employer. This District does not discriminate on the basis of age.gender or handicap.
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
MINUTES OF JULY 91 1992, SPECIAL BOARD MEETING
(EXCERPT OF MINUTES OF 7/9/92 SPECIAL MEETING)
Board of Trustees BOARD OF
Trustee Marcus reported on the WOCCSE BAC meetings TRUSTEES
noting that the Brown Act extends to advisory
committees appointed by legislative bodies and
stated that since there has been an opinion from
County Counsel, it is the responsibility of Boards
of Trustees to ensure that such committees are in
compliance.
President Kanode reported on a workshop sponsored
by the State Department of Education and its
message regarding sexuality and health; stated
that she would be attending the CSBA curriculum
workshop next week; announced that the Board is
invited to the Management Symposium August 24 and
25; stated that the July 21 Board meeting will
begin at 5:30 p.m. with a study session preceding
the Regular Meeting to hear recommendations of the
Real Property Asset Management Advisory Committee.
EXHIBIT A (Page. 15 of 27)
ATTACHMENT NO.
o OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
T. ,,C_,
5,::,= •^•-••-•^• James R. Tarwater. Ed.O. _�-• •• � Lottie M Hobbs. President
Charles Oste.Me Clerk
Carol KanodKahan.Member
Tracy Penman.Member
Nancy Stuever.Member
-INOUEST 17200 PINEHURST LANE - HUNTINGTON BEACH - CALIFORNIA - 92ti47 - 714 b47.2551 - FAX 714 047 1430
OF EXCELLENCE- We are An Equal Opportunity Employer This District does not discriminate on the basis of age.gender or handicap.
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 1992
(EXCERPT OF MINUTES OF 8/11/92 MEETING)
Dr. Tarwater presented his analysis of findings
related to the District management organizational
model and proposed restructuring. Following
discussion, the Board's consensus was to approve
the following goals for 1992-93 :
2. FISCAL MANAGEMENT
Develop a long range financial plan that
balances the budget, communicates more
effectively an ongoing financial analysis,
responds to and improves internal
efficiencies, and establishes a real property
asset management system
EXHIBIT A (Page ,17 of 27)
ATTACH EN 1 NO.
MINUTES OF JANUARY 11, 1993, SPECIAL BOARD MEETING
(EXCERPT OF MINUTES OF 1/11/93 MEETING)
PROPOSED BOLSA CHICA DEVELOPMENT AND SHORT & LONG PROPOSED
RANGE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING NEEDS: An informa- BOLSA CHICA
tion study session was provided in order to present DEVELOPMENT AND
information to the Board concerned with the Bolsa SHORT i LONG
Chica project and other short and long-range asset RANGE ASSET
management planning needs. Representing Community MANAGEMENT
Systems Associates, Inc. (CSA) were Dr. Geoff Teale PLANNING NEEDS
and Mr. John Hutt. Mr. Greg Cizek, Vice President
of the Koll Company and Mrs. Jayna Morgan of STA,
Inc. , provided additional information regarding the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and boundary
recommendations.
Members of the Board requested a tour of the Bolsa
Chica area which will be conducted by Koll Company
representatives.
EXHIBIT A (Page 19 of 27) ATTACHMENT NO. 3A
o OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Superintendent James R.Tarwater.Ed.D. oC::J s;Ce; Lowe M. Hobbs. PreS.ar-lt
Charles Ostertund.Clerk
Carol Kanoce.Member
Pellma
Tracy Pel►man.Member
Nancy Stuever.Member
,IN OUEST 17200 PINEHURST LANE - HUNTINGTON BEACH - CALIFORNIA - 92647 • 714 847-2551 - FAX 714 847-1430
OF EXCELLENCE- We are An Equal Opportunity Employer.This District does not discriminate on the basis of age.gender or handicap.
EXCERPT OF BOARD MINUTES
ADOPTED BOARD OF TRUSTEES
MINUTES - SPECIAL MEETING
FEBRUARY 9, 1993
INFORMATION/ACTION ITEMS
BUSINESS IG FINANCE
STUDY SESSION - REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT: REAL PROPERTY
The Board of Trustees conducted a Study Session ASSET MANAGEMENT
regarding the District's real property assets. Dr.
Tarwater introduced Dr. Oswalt and Mr. Godino, the
District's identified Real Property Asset Manager
and legal counsel, and requested that they assist
the Board in reviewing the strategic plan for
asset management. Dr. Oswalt stated that the main
purpose of the meeting was to gather direction as
to how the Board would wish the District to
proceed. Discussion and questions ensued. During
discussion, a proposed Asset Management Plan and
Summary of Revenue Potential was presented for the
Board's review and consideration. (Exhibit A)
EXHIBIT A (Page 21, of 27)
ATTACHMENT NO-' -��
MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 9, 1993, REGULAR BOARD MEETING
& Operations Facilities. This plan should
consider long term District and asset
management needs.
Clerk Osterlund reviewed the following agenda items
which had been discussed during the meeting with
the exception of item No. 6 which was withheld at
this time:
1. Review the Report of the Real Property Asset
Management Advisory Committee (Exhibit A) ;
Executive Summary of the Real Property Asset
Management Advisory Committee Report; and,
(Exhibit C) Implementation of Asset Management
Plan.
2. Establish a time period to discuss the
Advisory Committee recommendations on:
(A) Crest View, (B) Haven View
3 . Receive information on potential leasing
opportunities on: A. Crest View,
B. Haven View
4 . Discuss steps necessary to formalize local
agreements with any potential lessee.
5. Discuss Board philosophy related to short term
leases or land leases on above sites.
6. (Withheld)
7 . Discuss methodology for handling lease
agreements, tenant problems, site inspections
and program monitoring on a cost guarantee
basis.
8. Discuss Board philosophy on a joint powers
agreement with one or more neighboring
districts for use of Ocean View transportation
and maintenance/operations facilities.
9. (Other)
10. It is recommended that the next Board Study
Session include discussions on:
• A non-profit corporation
• Need for a school facility in the Bolsa
Chica
• Bolsa Chica boundaries
Mr. Jim Righeimer, former member of the Real
Property Asset Management Committee, expressed his
appreciation for the Board support.
EXHIBIT A (Page 23; of 27) ATTACHMIENT NO. 3 9 J
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
OSuoen!enoent James R T-trwater Eo.D o:.arc of T•;;;tees LoMe►.i HoSCs P•r;•oen'
Cbares OsteuunC Clerk
Caro'Kanode.Member
Tracy Penman. Member
—Nancy Stuever.Member
INQUEST 17200 PINEHURST LANE • HUNTINGTON BEACH • CALIFORNIA • 92647 •714 847-2551 - FAX 714 847-1430
OF EXCELLENCE- We are An Equal Opportunity Empiover.This District does not discriminate on the basis of age.gender or handicap.
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 1993, REGULAR BOARD MEETING
(EXCERPT OF MINUTES OF JULY 13, 1993, REGULAR MEETING)
INFORMATION/ACTION ITEMS
BUSINESS h FINANCE
ASSET MANAGEMENT - CREST VIEW AND RANCHO VIEW ASSET MANAGEMENT
SITES: Mr. Gordon Busch, parent, urged the Board CREST i RANCHO
to defer decision regarding this item until VIEW
appropriate structures have been developed. Mr.
Dick Godino, Attorney for the District, reviewed
discussions with the District and City of
Huntington Beach regarding options for management
and utilization of the District's assets, and
responded to questions from the Board. MOTION by
Trustee Kanode and seconded by Trustee Stuever to
declare the Crest View site as surplus and direct
administration to commence the process for
selection of a developer on this property; direct
administration and the District's property
consultant to immediately begin discussions with
the City regarding all District properties with
particular emphasis on Crest View and Rancho
View; and that funds generated from this be
restricted as determined by the Board. Discussion
ensued and included the pros and cons of moving
forward with this action, options for alternative
use of the sites and the potential for loss to
the District and City. Following discussion, the
Board's consensus was to direct the Superin-
tendent to prepare a timeline for presentation to
the Board addressing Item No. 5, page 3, as
presented. On the motion, Trustees Kanode,
Stuever and Pellman voted yes; Trustees Osterlund
and Hobbs voted no. The motion carried (3-2) .
EXHIBIT A (Page 25 of 27)
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
;,�M2
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
S_De-I nCr— ,lames R. Tarwater. Ed.D. =��'= Lottie M Hobbs. President
Charles Ostertund.Clerk
Carol an Member
P
Tracy Penman.
.Member
Nancy Stuever.Member
•INOUEST 17200 PINEHURST LANE • HUNTINGTON BEACH • CALIFORNIA • 92o47 • 71•: 637-1551 . FAX 714 ti47.1330
OF EXCELLENCE- We are An Equal Opportunity Employer. This District does not discriminate on the basis of age,gender or handicap.
EXCERPT OF MINUTES
OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
AUGUST 24, 1993
INFORMATION/ACTION ITEMS
BUSINESS & FINANCE
STUDY SESSION - REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGMENT PLAN, LONG TERM
LEASES: Dr. Tarwater reviewed the Board's progress in development
of a Real Property Asset Management Plan including the August 10
deliberations regarding short term leases. Discussion ensued until
7: 03 p.m. At this time, President Osterlund reviewed the August 10
discussion which included short term lease priorities, and declared
that the discussion would continue later in the meeting following
Staff Recognition.
STUDY SESSION - REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN, LONG TERM
LEASES (Continued) : Discussion continued and staff was directed to
develop a mechanism for protecting long term lease funds for their
intended purpose, to bring back to the Board more information
regarding a Property Manager Consultant, and to set parameters for
an RFP (Request for Proposals) .
EXHIBIT A (Page 21 of 27) AMCHMCNT NO. 3•g5
J to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public notices by
,f the Superior Court of Orange County, California. Number A-6214,
aer 29, 1961,and A-24831 June 11, 1963.
PROOF OF PUBLICATION liccelveD
SEP 10 1993
0VSU rufsc:y'0
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
SS.
County of Orange )
am a Citizen of the United States and a
-esident of the County aforesaid; I am over
he age of eighteen years, and not a party to
)r interested in the below entitled matter. I
im a principal clerk of the NEWPORT
3EACH-COSTA MESA DAILY PILOT, a
lewspaper of general circulation, printed and
lublished in the City of Costa Mesa, County
if Orange, State of California, and that PusuC NOTICE
ttached Notice is a true and complete copy "Notice '' h"'bt' �'" .
that the Ocean lew
s was printed and published on the tom'SD1s�trts tom►': ,
at ,T20� Pinehust
.wing dates: NtM,esgton Beach,-Cantor.
Me 9247 at 7 00 pia.,will
hold a Public itprtnp to
consider Log
to the
state of Board of Educe-
Von for the wahror of ar-
taln provisions of the Edo-
cation Cods relating to the
Septenber 4, 1993 b e s rd
p
ePubllshed Newport
Beach-Costa Mesa Daily
Pilot September 4,19M.
Sa969
ieclare, under penalty of perjury, that the
�regoing is true and correct.
:ecuted on SeptWber 4 , 199 3
Costa Mesa, California.
"1
eif-
Signature
ATTACHMENT NO. ?)Ik , n
y
v
J
THURSMY,OXEM/ER 14, 14 p
iA
NeigMm oppose ]PIMIS. N7 Stv »a on 11d school site l
*I Artsstacta hee0ll¢Si1e11111ti[r► is a Lig coder for the d/strlcl. J we bored flee dty cadd penei i
'We be will buAdinpa Cyst J ale sales taX,'raid C*rald
are3D yetm or Wei.and tab Chipman,vommedtter vkc
i Kanvi(TION BLACK— remak*"19 sebools m 20 rimir nan
W%m ants vying aeaar a Tress or*Adder, be tali. W '(CresA Met�l soemed to he ,.
dbaed sdlool site hoard the nevi admttonal-evenue fmm one of the few+nett Wheeze a bi
pnpetlyf Vill►aroma a rltup- lomy4wm)ewes that wouhl be boa-typo cornamcial thine
ping esanxr that'rtt'.ijKmW Has. used on mpital kaprosdaa ants. coved be fiere.Wu felt It__uld �
No.ba�ea:tbstiLyarria. We 1W lbid am ldr-�[SdWo1 9 � be 4�IDrtt to a way to be
A drek'an m the tab of seeds bolmd a(,and we road buffered.' D
Ored View School was dee:ayerd !le rt CI=b(tint their;.We Fesideits fear a Wet-Mart a
Tom day by tM do FlenaAtbg need awney topour hwk In I Hen oe Deow will be Duitt them
Cosar+iaWart AM$oasri tti5ett+ TM twRe teas sot given tis fiat." 'Ibrva w aen:ee that Qw.0 bmI
ScLo A Dimbid odtdab regaest-. The PrWaed zcrjizg changeI ehea•ps wfl be moving in.
ed Names 05 coauf ap w1lb a plan which ck►red to 19u I.Ile ddil s at eptkW that their Heads Witt caste up durintl a three-yes:_ "It world be a mien-amV
adgrembte 1e etrerycme. opp oaa the kica,se ring It would be takwt into aonddAnttiam study of tea city's general ptsn. thin 1,with fear or five.ven-
TM 13-ane at*al Talbeatt beer paaRremy nsl.ra•aditminaie Ming to dmuu- The adwisory aoamraitlse car.- does"be said. 'It's not going It
Avmew mar Beach HeahlevWX% badly-neo4ed opm space and vest It' p I;nand irk.- doctime the sfodl fell Crest be a bfcg Emc."
wJH*Wet zoned 11W rstadetMid bafmg unwanted»else and tked- Manta Josephsomem d.'1&kik Mewwas cite d the few sthc Raesidmft&h*say the datric
booing waW dsrther achem. tic to the Aft* the stool d1 hft w@Wvthe left i-1 the dty fa Ceffmarcir.t nugM need Crete Mew egaln tr
Dilbiat efiSmals brpe to qet Wale balk city mad distrlct mares f dent Imew U they dery bpsaemL the 4tuir e.because nmW Vatatr
an Inamisrd n*m*resaded asciab prea em i to ooesearsi- semmT tardeaebeorst the red 01 it 'Samm"ttireCW Was ttm fames hrm rowed isto the
cask kMo tea scbds with Car- I cs with residents ear my ISM~h.• I base had been dropplag,vie nelgbborhood'f affordable.loos
n mrW devaiopmeni ad We,
1 le&Mon taken,taoce resdrrtsam Theater admke that morny I wentookiig forareaswhw4 ing.
'dom It's weld,fiat.aagvdAi
a lion prince t-)gel 2 bade would
be phenawArW" resident
Roberti Groat sail
Oblrict denwgmpbie-stutba
than the ttcbool won't neee to
i we-Upon,because stur"rettsCook
be l►jeed to Lake View Elesien-
> tary,wb"bas roam to grow,
7WWw said.
NW Chapmsh said the
advisory nrmmaittee d ocussad
m Cant Vfeaw ab"t Iwo Teats
I ago.residents sad they were
alerted to the pm9ble zone
charge-I—t m ba tiled 1� Z►
errs that a Wa4M0rt Wmm
be cc Its"in tova
Jowphsoa ties wrote to rity
.C'arer.'iwsbew.-etttt:cSC1du1-" .
ed it PeaUcih wtta kis wUe,ikb-
251 remount we rented at
..... -11r7rwnnirn i-,... ..,.i•...
O
-• An Orange County Register Publication fThe Wave
Thursday , January 18, 1996
Residents oppose Crest View retail plans
BY JESSICA YOUNG an uproar. without their input.
he Huntington Beach Wave Neariv 100 residents crowded into "This is listed as closed session but
the Ocean View School District board why should it be?" resident Marvin
Concern that the closed Crest View meeting Tuesday waving yellow "Save Josephson demanded. "It's taxpayer
-enooi site will wind up as a noisy. Crest View' picket signs to protest money, taxpayer land. It should be
rat iic-congested mall has neighbors in
what they feel is back-room dealing open for discussion. We want our
between deveiopers and the district Please see SCHOOL/Pa" 14
CHOOL
,m cage ,
iooi back. *re want our open
er yelp ment options that include a tended a recent meeting to dis- residential development among
and we not going to go rive-tenant complex that could cuss the site would prefer the them. He said the city is pushing
Discussion of the site. which bring the cash-strapped district school reopening. A team of vol- for commercial zoning because
ised in 1992. has been limited about S600.000 a year. unteer demographers plan to there are only three closed
closed sessions. Superinten- "Nothing has gone to the board walk door-to-door counting chil- school sites in the city with "po-
!nt James Tarwater said. be- for approval." Tarwater said. dren in the area they say support tential for commerical develop-
use the City Council has yet to "We haven't even selected the of- such a use. Others said they'd ment."He said the city expects to
!termine whether the 13.6-acre ficial developer." rather see homes on the site or gain significant sales tax revenue
ircei rear the interesection of Josephson and fellow resident dedication of the property for from a retail complex.
eacn uuuieyara ana Talbert Robert Cr onk said they had youth sports as part of the Save "The reason the city is excited
heard the aistrict was entertain- Our Kids March ballot bond in- about talking to us is they are
venue -xiil retain its current ing the idea of a superstore and :dative. lacing a deficit." Tarwater said.
aolic:residential designation or that's wnat prompted them to "A complete marketing study "They're saying overail they feel
e rezoned commercial. meet with Tarwater and consult- has not been done." Cronk told this would be the best use as
.0nee that property is gone. ant Wayne D. Wedin last week. the board. "I think what you commercial. We take our cues
s eone forever." resident During the meeting they viewed have right now is a consultant from the city."
ackie Hewitt told board mem- what they said was a blueprint who will tell you anything you
ers. 'Once it's made into con- for future development that in- want to hear. This board needs Tarwater expects the issue to
rete. it will be lost forever. No eludes the rive stores and three to meet with the community." come before the City Council in
ne nas come to us and asked us fast-food sites. Tarwater called the outline "a the next 60-90 days,offering resi-
ow we feel about it. I can't Josephson said many Crest conceptual plan." one of several dents an opportunity for a public
elieve the board would think we View-area residents who at- options the district will review— hearing then.
:ouid meekly accept it."
The school district has hired a
onsuitant and is discussing de-
ATTACHMENT NO. 3• 19
P
THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER, MONDAY, FEB. 5, 1996
Buchanan, assistant superinten-
What do ou dent of the Huntington Beach
y City School District. "Every lit-
tle section got its own school."
Decades later, empty nester
do with an parents remain h their ty val-
ues while high property val-
ues have locked many young
empty school?
families out of this corner of the
county.
Young couples in the 1990s are
flocking instead to new, less-ex-
EDUCATION: While most of the pensive homes in Irvine and the
county a les with school short- Saddleback Valley. Poorer fam-
ilies with more children are
ages. Huntington Beach and Foun- crowding into apartments in San-
tain Valley must decide what to do to TheAna result: Irvine Unified
with surplus schools. School District's enrollment
By JESSICA YOUNG grew by 32 percent from 1985 to
The Orange County Register 1995. Saddleback Valley grew 42
percent and Santa Ana grew 37
HUNTINGTON BEACH Neighborhood de- percent. Countywide, districts
mographers Marvin Josephson and Marjorie Cam- averaged 23 percent growth. But
pos knocked on every door of the Beach Bluff the three districts serving most
Apartments last week. Neither darkness nor puz- of Huntington Beach and Foun-
zled looks from tenants deterred them from their tain Valley averaged no growth
task: counting kids. during that period after losing
The pair head a group of 200 neighbors of the about half their enrollment in the
closed Crest View School who spend weekends and previous decade.
evenings tallying toddlers. They hope their home- THE FEEDER SCHOOLS
spun survey will persuade city and school officials
to reopen the school, whose land is being proposed Ocean View School District
as a shopping center. took a long, hard look at enroll-
"I have a lot of interest in this: my back yard will ment trends in the early 1980s
back up to it," resident Karen La Pier told Ocean and changed the way its schools
View School District board members last month. were organized. In the past, kin-
"The kids go skating and ride their bikes there. It is dergarten-through-8th-grade
my dream to reopen that school." schools went with neighbor-
Crest View is one of 23 closed schools belonging to hoods.Now they are kept open or
three Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley closed based on geography.
school districts in a county where school shortages
are the norm. While Santa Ana's Madison Elemen-
tary School added 21 modules to its 6-acre campus
to keep kids at desks, dozens of closed Huntington
Beach schools are leased out as soccer fields, day-
care centers and community college classrooms.
The surplus schools are legacies of a 1960s hous-
ing boom when there were enough development
dollars to put a school in nearly every neighbor-
hood and enough children to fill them.
"These schools were built in the '50s and '60s
when whole tracts sold out in weeks." said Jerry
ATTACHMENT N 3.9 q
"If someone is used to looking
Crest View is now leased to across at a well-manicured
A series of seven school cio- three tenants — a church. a pre- school site their children used.
sures began in 1983: those left school and a county education and now it has changed,it's very
were consolidated over the next program.-Leasing the land to a painful." Ecker said.
few years as elementary schools developer who would build a KEEPING THE GREEN
designed to feed into four strate shopping center could bring the
gicall% placed.converted middle district about $600.000 a year• The sound of children playing
schools. Tarwater said. City officials esti- outside is music to some resi-
Schools such as Crest View and mate that a shopping center dents' ears. racket to others'.
Haven View, which are on the could generate S500.000 in sales what to do with three large fields
edges of the district,were closed tax. behind the closed Gisler School is
in 1992 because they did not fit "The reason the city is excited the job of 11 residents on a site-
the new hub organization. But about talking to us is they are selection committee that formed
while Crest View will likely be facing a deficit." Tarwater said. in December.
developed as commercial resi- "They're saving, overall, they
ciential property, Haven Vie"
feel this would go best as com- "The neighbors go ballistic
mercial. We take our cues from when the soccer starts at - a.m.
will be kept on short-term lease and is still running around at 10
to a church, and possibly be re the cit}."
opened should new homes be Not every neighborhood is op- p.m.." said Jerry Buchanan, as
built at nearb} Bolsa Chica. posed to development,especially sistant superintendent of the
d Huntington Beach City School
if it replaces a poorly maintaine
"In another five years, there will be another generation com- building manv residents have District.
ing in." Superintendent James come to view as an evesore. Site committee Chairman Rick
Tarwater said. "We have the Neighbors of Bushard School. Jones said each member must
closed since 1982. applauded the interview 10-15 neighbors about
system, because it's geographic Fountain Valley School District their views on future uses of the
now, to handle the kids." last week when it closed escrow site.
In deciding when to sell vacant on a$5 million sale to a developer
schools, districts consider the who plans to build 60 new homes One option—selling the land to
market value of the property,the there. the city for use as a youth sports
likelihood that enrollment will in "We feel it's very good for the area — relies on passage of an
crease,and whether the property district with all the cuts in the advisory vote called Save Our
can be sold for development. Al- programs." said resident Terry Kids on the March ballot. It call.,
though districts own the land,the Wickenkamp, who lives across for residential assessments of
city decides zoning, which deter from the school. "Hopefully S12 to S36 dollars a year to fund
mines what gets built. some of that money will be fun- city purchase or lease of open
Schools and city planners often neled back into the classroom." space for use by youths.
work with developers to deter- WickenKamp and about 100
mine how sites will be used.Hun- neighbors attended several Other possible uses for Gisler
tington Beach is updating its gen years of public meetings with the include conversion of the build-
eral plan to address closed district and three different devel- ing into a city-operated senior
schools that could wind up as ooers betore the deal with Pres- center or sale of the property for
parks for youth sports, new ley was cinched. Neighbors on- residential development. said
homes or stores.
posed condominiums that would Buchanan. who estimated the
THE DEVELOPMENT OPTION mirror a high-density project value of the 13.7 acres at about$'
The furor over Crest View be- nearby. all the developers inter- million.
gan because residents got in- viewed agreed to build only sin- The district closed five schools
volved betore the district had Qle-family homes. in the past 15 years when
time to select the develo er and Fountain Valev assistant Su
p erintendent Marc Ecker said enroll-
ment dropped from 7.000 to about
come to the community with a P 4.500. Recently, growth on the
plan, school officials say. Resi- the sale won resident approval in west side of the district is expect-
dents insist that district officials part because the district kept the ed to add a new school near the
should have informed them when proiect in harmony with the Holly Sea Cliff development in
the site. which faces Talbert ay_ neighborhood. 1998. Should enrollment in-
enue just east of Beach Boule- Ecker said interest alone from crease, the closed Peterson
vard. was first considered for the sale will earn the district school site could be reopened
commercial development. about $400.000 a year — money when its lease expires in August.
Neighbors learned of a develop- badly needed in an era of cuts in
er's proposal when city planners school funding. Gisler. which is already being
were reviewing the site as part of The Fountain Valley district used by Little League and the
an update on closed schools. closed eight schools between 19-Q American Youth Soccer Organi-
Many were outraged. and 1990. when attendance zation. may be ideally suited to
"The people learned about the dropped from 11.000 to 5.600. The continue its current use.
potential zoning that they remaining sites are being leased.
and there are plans to sell one "I'm sure the noise will d an
wouldn't have otherwise." Crest p issue. Some people like children.
View neighbor Robert Cronk more school. me don't "Jones said. If peo-
aid. "City Council has the ulti- Even w so .
when logic dictates the so said ves i to the advisor-
:Hate autnority to rezone it. If we sale. Ecker said residents can vote). that would be exciting.
let the schooi board proceed. become upset about the loss of
thev'11 get the Citv Council in open space and a school that You'd have a site that was being
their back pocket." played a role in their lives. used by hundreds of youths."
ATTACHMENT 1 0. 3. I�o
SURPLUS SCHO.O_L SITES
Md&dden ' �,,�,. �,` ,,.._ ,�Harper(19�198+1)
= ►Curmndyt dle�Huntfnp
?',-rr*+'rtt' Ave. 405. ::Valley Adult
Glenview `►Proposed:�in process of sale for f'
- Edinger Ave,• million to tleVeio"Kaufman&Broad.
ven 0 ¢ Edinger Ave. •
,cry * Q * 60 new homes.
' .. 1 la
Nieblas FOUNTAIN 1 Lamb(1964-1979)
[ Heil Ave. cc Meadow Park Pie t VALLEY Heil Ave. ►Currently:Leered as Huntington Beac
r View ��� P.
Lark View View v __ ze Union High SchoollDistrict headquarter
N ►ProposeltC,ontltwed 1lterm,lease
warner Ave. E ; View Rancho View warner Ave. Mr
,.. school vffioesr
3 N t wamkm(1914-1982)
`- MCC) ell ►Currentty:Leased to Gids 3 Boys Club
Z
Sister „ E Slater Ave,
Ave * ,.. Orange County 111tad Start and t0 JSE
W Fountain Valley , _ - Musk Instruction for private lessons.
3 2 P.Pmpm*Co sawed shomterm Im
TAW. g " y eW O *,? �Buslwd(1965.1984
HUN7INGTON Harper _ ►Reciindy.1 Used for onceaweek
BEACH the Boys and time Club before being
Ellis Ave. N R demolished in November.
t m g 3 ►Future:Escrow doted on$5 million s:
L = to Presley t.wnpanias to build 58 home
Garfield s
Ave. = lamb ArweloNt96+1r198q
IE Bushard ►CurrerW.SM leased to Pegasus Schc
ro6C~Ave. Wardlow until June of 1991:
LEMMA `' ,; ►Proposed t�neuwu as long•tenrt lea!
itington Beach = Adams Ave. ,7, _ _ for private sdfooi.
Fountain Valley * 0 LJghUfoY�llLeeM
)ol districts are , * ., Fourtskt malnt:narha,
l� ''ng 23 closed schools Indianapolis Ave. N V warlrihouse.faCililte
`Q Could ole sale for residential �� A Burke � � -be soldii�� ry
commercial development. t. 4' "
dilemma for cash-strapped Atlanta Ave.
ricts is balancing the need to
land for money to operate existing Hamilton Ave. Gisler Building being I SCH t ICj,�
used s schoo
cols against the need to keep its options �Le 1)981)
!n as enrollment increases.Meanwhile, Beady City Sch
ny sites continue to Ix leased to private schools, ' Ban14g Ave. District permit wit
irches and sports leagues. - Seaview U tleLilalgtu.
► as district offices
Dates show sd+ooli'foundi'nq and'ctosun. FOUNTAIN VALLEY "' 0)Be+rit�El9illN}
MAN VIEW Lark View(1967.1983) SCHOOL DISTRICT � ► base.to National
.HOOL DISTRICT IJ ►Currently:Ocean View School District 4 Nieblas(1966.1983) Pediatric GRexpi n In 19
headquartemlaven View(1965-1992) ► osad:Maintain as school offices ►Currentiy:Short-tern,leases to private � ' �,.�-..�
umntty:Leased to Grace Park View 1970-1989 schools including Magic Hours School, ►hopasedtMorift �poet�Je reuse
heran Church. ( ) Montessori School,Carden School of �hool,
►Currently:Leased to Huntington
wosed.Keep for future reuse as Fountain Valley,Hilltop PresichooL TWO
-01. Beach onion High Scrod District Adult rooms leased to Cound)on bltrrtk t61t
Education. Education adult ► ittd t ¢w ¢�r d<
3obinwood(1962-1978) ►Proposed:Long-term lease to city for ► Continued short leases of- SootAG ,:••r
urrently;Leased to Coastline youth sports field. ► �! t�iQen
nmunity College. one fin
roposed:Maintain as short-term Rwcho View(1959-1976) McDowell!(1967.1979) , I.CWM
Se. ►Cunarrtly:Vacant. r t7rhe room leased"aeie�wi(y.•} '
►Propwwed:Demolish and sell to with ad tare Montt
toCooperathre OrgartizatfoftfiXthe
Meadow View(19 neat developers as mixed-use residential and Development of Employee Selection ,t : .;.
urrertdy:leased to Great commercial. Procedures since July 1991JIlamainder It _ lease>rsday�n
ierkan Learning Center preschool, Q Pleasant View(1963-1983) Fountain Valley School Distr16
xrt's Dance,Sandy's Daycare. ow Currently.*Leased to Child's View headquarters.
'den Conservatory. preschool,Inhouse Day Cue,YMCA. ►Proposed:Continue use of as school .•
roposed:Keep for future reuse as Pirterseei�( -1981)
;hoof. ►Proposed:Maintain as short-term headquarters. P. ,Leased to Coast
r View(1969.1983) lei. ji Fountain Valley(1898.rebuilt 1929. �II �
.crest view(1961-1992) 1962-1989) ►Proposed:Firstx{tool for
uricat1r.Lease to Greatesdhool. ►Currently.Leased to Grace Church, ►Currently:Site leased to Rossier School reopening as enrollment Increases.
roposed:Maintain as short-term Great American Learning Center until June 2000
Preschool,Horizon Education Program. ►Future:Continue as long-term lease
se. JAMS 1E�lrhe Or County Re
►Proposed:Shopping center. for private school >�
ATTACHMENT NO. 3 , 101
O OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Superintendent James R.Tarwater. Ed.D. Board of Trustees Nancy Stuever, President
A Charles Oste. Me Clerk
Carol KanodKahan, Member
Tracy Penman.Member
"vm� Pam Walker,Member
-INQUEST 17200 PINEHURST LANE • HUNTINGTON BEACH • CALIFORNIA• 92647• 714/847-2551 • FAX 714/847-1430
OF EXCELLENCE- We are An Equal Opportunity Employer.This Distnct does not discriminate on the basis of age,gender or handicap.
February 5, 1996
Dear Crest View Neighbors:
Thank you for attending the Crest View Neighborhood meeting on Thursday, February 1, 1996. l hope
you received valuable information both from the City of Huntington Beach and Ocean View School
District.
Your concerns regarding open spaces and the desire to reopen Crest View are understandable. Many
districts are in the same dilemma as Ocean View School District in that they have older facilities and
excess school sites. Schools were built around communities and over time they have become part of
the neighborhood environment which makes it difficult to lose such an asset.
Community comments from the blue cards received at the Crest View Community meeting are as
follows:
• Keep low-density residential.
• Huntington Beach is notorious for running retail business out.
• Redevelop Huntington Mall, Seacliff, and numerous strip malls before
building another retail center.
• Not enough areas for youth sports in the city now.
• Keep open space for children.
• Don't ruin property values.
• Consider going commercial with Rancho View first.
• Traffic on Talbert would be impossible and dangerous.
• How many children attend school in different districts or schools other
than Lake or Vista.
The District will keep the Crest View community informed as to future meetings regarding the reuse
of the Crest View site.
Thank you again for the exchange of information and your concerns.
Sincerely,
��/ditrcr�
?James R. Tarwater, Ed.D., District Superintendent
JRT.-jl
r
ARNEL RETAIL GROUP
950 South Coast Drive,Suite #200 - Costa Mesa, CA 92626
TEL. (714) 434-5044 • FAX: (714) 557-3129
December 26, 1996
Mr. Mike Uberaga
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 Main Street
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648-2702
RE. CREST VIEW SCHOOL SITE
Dear Mike:
As you are aware,Arnel Retail Group signed a Ground Lease with the Ocean View School District
to develop the Crest View School site near Beach Boulevard and Talbert Street in Huntington
Beach. During the past fourteen months, we have been working with the City and the School
District to create a development that would be acceptable to all parties.
One concept Arnel is working on includes a Wal-Mart as our lead tenant. We have come to a
tentative agreement with Wal-Mart under the following two (2) conditions: The first one being the
elimination of traffic impact fees for the project. The second condition is the modification to the
Ground Lease eliminating a provision that prohibits users similar to Wal-Mart at the Crest View
site. A meeting with the'Ocean View School Board is scheduled for January 14th to discuss this
issue. Please accept this letter as our formal request for a waiver or reimbursement of the City
traffic impact fees for the proposed Wal-Mart concept.
If you should have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
ARNEL RE T GROUP
Thomas F. Love
Principal
TFLsb �,,-
:. 3 ING
;i��� DECDFD
/0 0
A�ACHMEN I NO. 3_�
� S
•
City of Huntington Beach
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Director 714/536-5582 Redevelopment 714/536-5582
January 14, 1997 FAX 714/375-5087 Housing 714/536-5542
Mr. Tom Love
Arnel Retail Group
950 South Coast Drive, Suite 200
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Dear Tom:
Thank you for keeping City staff apprised of your efforts to secure tenants for the Crest View and
Rancho View sites. The City's goal is to maximize the sales tax generated by these sites. This is
consistent with the policy of our City Council as outlined in the attached resolution which was
adopted on July 1, 1996.
We understand that WalMart is interested in the Crest View site and not interested in the Rancho
View site, and that WalMart is the single largest sales tax generating prospect for either of the
sites. You have asked about the City's position for a WalMart on the Crest View site. If
WalMart is the tenant which will allow you to achieve the highest possible sales tax in
conformance with the Council's policy, then we would encourage you to pursue them as a tenant
on the Crest View site. Of course, any commercial development on either site will be subject to
the City's standard entitlement process.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely yours,
64W el W
David C. Biggs
Director of Economic Development
Attachment
cc: Mayor and City Council
Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator
Ray Silver,Assistant City Administrator
Melanie Fallon, Community Development Director
James Tarwater, Ocean View School District
ATTACHMENT N10. 3.1v� �j
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENCOURAGING APPLICATIONS FOR
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON LARGE PARCELS OF LAND
ADJACENT TO MAJOR ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS OR
OTHER VACANT OR UNDER UTILIZED PARCELS IN THE CITY
WHEREAS,the City desires to increase the commercial development opportunities at the
few remaining vacant or underutilized parcels in the city, and
A top priority of the City Council is to improve the City's revenue base; and
In pursuit of this goal, the City has analyzed commercial land use opportunities to expand
the city's retail sales tax, reduce retail sales tax leakage, and improve its overall economic base;
and
There are a limited number of large parcels adjacent to major arterials, including
vacant/surplus school-sites or any other vacant or underutilized sites which may lend themselves
to commercial/retail development and which can accommodate the types of sales tax generators
desired,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the city of Huntington Beach does hereby
resolve as follows:
L - That the City shall review any commercial site plan that mitigates the potential
impacts to the surrounding neighborhood to the greatest extent.possible, while still allowing for a
market driven development.
.. 1
4's:PCD:Rcso1:Rcta1rcf06-25.96
ATTACHMENT IDS
RLS 96-328
2. That the City Council acknowledges and supports the required land use review and
public hearing process, the professional :ccommendations of City staff and the advisory rule and
recommendations of the Planning Commission.
3. That the City Administrator is requested to work toward the pursuit of commercial
development opportunities on large parcels adjacent to major arterial highways, including
vacant/surplus school sites, or any other vacant or underutilized sites or parcels in the City of
Huntington Beach.
4. That the property owner/applicant for any such commercial/retail project shall pay
all entitlement fees necessary for the processing of the project_
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 1st day of JulY , 1996.
ayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk i Attorney
u5ey f'a. 6/y-.rhl
LNITIATED AND APPROVED: REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
Director of Cbmnvdnity Development Crty-Administrator
2
a S:PCD:Resol:RcuIrcf A 'TACH '��1 i NO, S. t o
06 2�96
RLS 96428 _
Res. No. 96-57
SPATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of
the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said
City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of
the City of Huntington Beach is seven;that the foregoing resolution was passed
and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said
City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1st of July; 1996 by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Harman,Leipzig,Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff,
Garofalo
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: Green
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach, California
c'�oiuti'rcsbkpg ATTACHMENT NO. 3.M7
8I I-W-H- DV.L.LV
RECEIVED
---- __ -- - -N 0T.0$ 1995 -- --
DEPARTMENT OF � ` 30
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT- --- - - - - - -_.. --------- ---- -- `- `-
-- - IM- '
i
_. ?,(/ate% 111L- - ---
IA
RECEIVED
To: Jane Madera - City of Huntington beach
N 0 V 0 51998
COMM UNITY
DEVELEPARTMENTOPMENT
From: Jay Prange
Date: Monday 11/2/98
Subject: Proposed Wa1Mart location Beach/Talbert
Ms. Madera,
This is a formal letter voicing my opinion AGAINST the building of a Wa1Mart
at the proposed Beach/Talbert location. As a home owner in the area ( Pammy
Lane) with children nearing school age I cite some of the reasons supporting my
view below:
• Increased auto traffic (estimated at approx. 12,000 car trips per day).
• Increased heavy truck (supply) traffic.
• No access from Beach at this proposed site.
• Area is not zoned for commercial sites.
• Local grade school situation for this area.
• Sacrifice of existing open playing fields.
I also believe a store of this magnitude (and history concerns of it's arrival in a
area) is better suited with direct access to an existing roadways that can handle
the increased estimates.
Are we led to believe that Huntington Beach has to tear down an existing school
zone to erect another WalMart?
Are no other sites that are already zoned for this type of environment available?
Best Regards,
I
Jay John Prange
18302 Pammy Lane
Huntington Beach
841-7440
Ms. Jane Madera
Department of Community Development
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California, 92648
Dear Ms. Madera;
I can not believe that a city with the good name that Huntington Beach has, would
consider allowing a Walmart to build with in our city limits.
They are demeaning to women and seniors, by underpaying them. They will drive
small businesses out of existence, businesses that are flourishing at this time in
our fair city.
Think about it, Ms. Madera, none of the Walmart hourly employees could afford to
live in Huntington Beach, because of the Walmart's policy of sub-standard pay
scale.
Is that the kind of neighbors we want in Huntington Beach?
I think notll
Sincerely,
JoAnn Beale
16362 Santa Anita Lane
Huntington Beach, California 92649
^ ` C�
U
Cz -
PC E IV ED
OCT 2 31998
9-
November 23, 1998
F-i L t
Theresa A. Roberts CI i Y t,L K
18355 Gum Tree Lane ITYOV
Huntington Beach, CA 92646 RECEIVED HU CA
Connie Brockway, City Clerk NOV 3 01998
City of Huntington Beach DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Ms. Brockway:
I am writing to express my opposition to the rezoning of Crest View School to Commercial and
to the building of a Wal-Mart at Crest View School. I agree with the Planning Commission—a
Wal-Mart at Crest View is bad for Huntington Beach. Here are just a few reasons why:
■ Open space in the Crest View area of Huntington Beach falls far short of the city's
goal. Once the open space is gone, it will be lost forever.
■ Traffic will be severely, negatively impacted on Beach, Talbert,Ellis, Slater and the
surrounding areas.
■ Local Huntington Beach merchants will be hurt and many will be put out of business,
despite Wal-Mart's claims to the contrary. Even Wal-Mart doesn't want to be located
too close to another Wal-Mart (the Wal-Mart at Beach and 22).
■ Destroying a school in a city with a projected population growth goes contrary to
what the citizens voted for- a reduction in class size. We need more schools and open
playing fields.
■ Rezoning to Commercial will allow a proposed sex-oriented business to open on
Beach Boulevard at Talbert. Huntington Beach Ordinance 5.70.05 states that sex
oriented businesses cause "depreciation of property values...increase in vacancies in
residential and commercial areas...increases in crime, litter, noise, and vandalism;
higher crime rates...and blighting conditions."
■ The proposed revenue from Wal-Mart amounts to 2/10ths of 1%of the city budget.
Why kill a neighborhood, destroy the local economy, and degrade Beach Boulevard
for such an insignificant pay-off?Let's develop Huntington Center instead.
As you enjoy Thanksgiving dinner with your family and friends, please don't forget the Crest
View families, or the family of Huntington Beach. We would all like to preserve the quality of
life that we are so thankful for here in Huntington Beach.
Sincerely,
Theresa A. Roberts
cc: Shirley Dettloff, Ralph H. Bauer, David P. Garofalo, Peter Green, Tom Harmon, Pam Julien,
Dave Sullivan
d ^l o� � l� 2: ram/-.
�y CIF f� RECEIVED
NOV 3 0 1998 z
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
-- "r•77
r7-
O
jl t p n i JQ N wLa1/' 1 �iOt ✓
I�
yt7 c-l
et r w U �-l CS L O Yt 'L v U-Q r' i?r^• n -T O� ✓rn . I Q '��"�i YY� 1'Yl`-7 o YYI z
711
r[ P p
Co
jCyL a ✓ r L E'� 1� 1�Q Q <�Y� : i O C
�v m o:J n Q s ci� J e ` ? T T'�w cjn /Jr o s a j"
J��-�'-(-)/? f- -q- ., S 4L r 7 r. « o Lt -I-
Ci 4 l :✓@ ✓y
Q e
,
��/ L/
/ "'�2 Q 61 �? �] 5 l y 2 2 � ( V a T' T:L � � /o !� r +� !Q i k C ✓ �C2 3 �, rV L /• , ri^� � ✓�
"1 �' +� Q Y•Q c�_ W� Cx I `.i � c? YJ�/ z C� / u �' �l � � �K •5 (✓ � n� Q C i'o s-`
J
��,• i YR g Lot y S i fl �Y-C C 'e_ ! Y 2 r 7 ! b a h t'S o
e-Go.. LAC/¢ / q ✓li� / ," CI F
CI4t/Y'c� ✓ S `f <3 I.ZJa�%-�i Q r o t ,�z C,t� o / C� C� l: k [ f1Y, c
4
o rr7 m Lt
Q Yl� f J ✓ o C'�� 1 1 GT
��, S' v C_tJ Q Q S fil ; k / t.c o ✓2 �� 7 Q Lj
€iC�� i
rITY CF
November 25, 1998 HUI i I '( i C;= �i=r�.C€�. CA
Huntington Beach RECEIVED
City Council Members
Ralph Bauer, Shirley Dettloff, Dave Garofalo, DEC 0 2 1998
Peter Green, Tom Harman, Pam Julien, Dave Sullivan 7PARTMENT OF PLANNING
- and -
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Re: Crest View School and Wal Mart
Dear Council Members and Ms. Brockway:
I am writing to express my onnosition to Wal Mart at Crest View School. My husband
and I live in the Crest View neighborhood and will be impacted in many negative ways by this
proposal should you as city council members vote for this project.
I want to ask you, is a"possible" $200,000.00 worth severely damaging the duality of life
not only for all of us in the Crest View neighborhood, but also all HB residents who will
inevitably be faced with tremendous gridlock at the intersections of Beach/Talbert,
Talbert/Newland and Beach/Ellis. The homes at Seacliff are not even finished and occupied —
then what—even worse gridlock?
I urge you to speak with Tom Livengood, Chairman of the Planning Commission,
concerning his financial analysis which was published in the November 19, 1998 Independent
newspaper and in the Wave newspaper. As he states, he has been in the retail business 40 years.
All kinds of figures regarding financial gain to the city of Huntington Beach have been presented
by staff, Mr. Biggs and Wal Mart. However, the bottom line is that the initial projected gain
of$400,000.00 is now CONSIDERABLY LESS. In Area 19 (the Crest View neighborhood)
we already have Target and K Mart which have exactly the same type of merchandise as Wal
Mart. The net effect of putting a Wal Mart at the Crest View school will only take away business
from K Mart and Target, notwithstanding the smaller stores in the area and have a zero profit for
the city of HB. This proposed location of the Wal Mart on the Crest View site does not do
anything for the residents who live on the west side of town-who will continue to go to
Westminster to shop.
Remember the sales tax projections for the indoor Swap Meet near McFadden and
Graham, or the revenue expected from charging the Frisbee Golfers at Central Park. Did these
V ~
Huntington Beach
City Council Members and Connie Brockway
November 25, 1998
Page 2
projections pan out? The latest Wal Mart sales tax estimate has dwindled to $200,000 (or less).
It is curious that this figure is equal to the $200,000/year that the Library receives from room
rental fees - $200,000 which is gained without any negative impacts. Crest View School is
absolutely the wrong place for a 24 hour Wal Mart store. What we need in Huntington Beach is
to first develop the already commercially zoned areas like Edinger corridor/Huntington Mall—
which is the logical place to put a big box store such as Wal Mart. Personally I would not have it
in my heart to pave over a school with a commercial development, especially when there already
are many commercial areas yet to be developed successfully. Our children are in need of and will
need that school site with its playing fields.
What we need in HB is higher end type of stores such as Penney's, Broadway,Nordstrom,
Robinsons May, etc., etc. —when the Huntington Center had Broadway and Penney's that is
where I did my shopping for work clothes, Christmas shopping, etc. —however since both of
those stores are no longer in HB, I now shop principally at South Coast Plaza where I can find
quality merchandise.
If I was asked what I would prefer to see done with the Crest View School, I would say,
leave it as is and fix it so that the facilities could be rented out to various groups, schools,
churches, etc. and maintain the field space for youth sports - something I'm sure our youth and
parents would appreciate tremendously. The school will be needed in the future—already there
are schools in the Ocean View District which are filled to capacity. If that would not be the
decision, then I would ask that you consider a single family housing development with an area of
open space for us all to enjoy.
Once again, I say IT IS NOT WORTH DESTROYING AN ENTIRE AREA OF
TOWN for a wish and a prayer of$200,000.00. Why on earth is the Crest View neighborhood
being played as a"pawn in a chess game"? Hundreds of us have voiced our concerns and still we
are just left with"shouting ever louder"in the hopes of being heard. This is not the right place
for a 24 hour big box store.
Sincerely,
Debbie Jos son
RECEIVED FROM �U�'�`�� ✓'�`����'`
AND MADE A PART OF THE REC��R T T 18341 Springtime Lane
COUNCIL MEETING OF � Huntington Beach, CA 92646
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK g
CONNIE BROCKWAY,CITY CLERK
Connie Brockway, City Clerk RECEIVED
City of Huntington Beach DEC 0 1 1996
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
Subject: Proposed Wal-Mart Project at Crest View Site
Dear Ms. Brockway:
As a homeowner who resides in the immediate vicinity of the proposed Wal-Mart
Project for the past 26 years, I am writing to oppose this project. My opposition
is for numerous reasons:
• The impact that this project will have on the residents in the
neighboring area and the residential quality of life issues such as
additional traffic, noise, safety, air quality, drainage, and the loss of
open space have been underestimated. The Good Shepherd
Cemetery, is located immediately to the North of the proposed site and
currently has an average of 12 burials per week that include solemn
rites at the grave side with clergy and often a substantial number of
mourners. There is a need to maintain the dignity and solemnity of the
religious services and avoid additional intrusion on those activities.
• Revenue. Of course this is very important to any city, however,
diverted sales tax does not increase revenue to the city. The
Huntington Beach Library generates $200,000 in revenue from renting
out its meeting rooms with no negative impact to the City. While Wal-
Mart will generate approximately the same amount of money with
negatives to the community and the City. The Sales Tax leakage will
not be helped by Wal-Mart. It appears that the City of Huntington
Beach would be facing a high risk with the addition of a Wal-Mart at
the Crest View site, due to the close proximity in the "Primary Market".
The ability to attract enough customers from this area as well as other
parts of the city, especially outside the "Primary Market" will not
happen. People living in the Harbor, the North end, and West side of
the city will not travel to Talbert to shop at a Wal-Mart.
The loss of open space. We do not have a park or place where we
can take our children/grandchildren to play in the area that is easily
accessible. The loss of 9.8 acres of open space suitable for playing
fields in a city with a shortage of youth facilities is a real concern.
During the last election the incumbents seemed concerned about
youth and the need to develop playing sites for these groups. The
General Plan projects the City's population will increase 40,000 in 20
years. There will be even more outcries for Youth Sports field and
schools from residents of the city.
• Quality shopping. Our city lacks quality shopping centers for us to
spend our money. Instead, we are forced to continue to go to
neighboring cities such as Costa Mesa and Newport Beach to buy
quality merchandise. Wal-Mart will not capture the Sales Tax
leakage.
• Wal-Mart locations. Since 1995, Wal-Mart has opened stores in
Orange County (Anaheim, Brea, Foothill Ranch, Laguna Niguel, Santa
Ana, & Westminster). According to the latest report of the FBI;
Department of Justice; populations figures from State Department of
Finance, Laguna Niguel has had an increase of total crime of 21.4%.
It is important to remember that those of us that live on the East side of Beach
Blvd. are also residents of the City of Huntington Beach and deserve the same
quality of life and representation as those residents that live in the Harbor and
the West side of Beach Blvd. I have spoken to many citizens from all parts of
the city and have not found 1 person who would shop or want a Wal-Mart at the
Crest View site.
I hope that you will concur with the Planning Commission and realize that the
Crest View site is the wrong place for a commercial store of the magnitude of a
Wal-Mart.
Thank you for your consideration.
Re ctfully,
BARBARA B SKOVICH
4.
Ir J' eVAllt
`12�01!.IVED FROM
AND MADE A PART OF THE RECORD THE
COUNCIL MEETING OF
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
H.B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING, Monday, November 30, 1998
C':-N!E BROCKWAY,CITY CLERK
RECEIVED
DEC 0 1 199�
I am a member of Crest View United. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
Much has been said about Crest View already, but most importantly we must remain
focused on the issue of re-zoning this school property for commercial purposes. Crest
View School is zoned public/residential and is located in the midst of a residential tract
and a cemetery. "Big Box" commercial developments are incompatible with existing
surrounding land uses of this property.
From the conclusions of the EIR we know that a Wal Mart type development would
severely impact the quality of life for the Crest View neighborhood. The last bit of open
space nearby and the school would be forever lost. Consequently the Plannin
Commission voted the project unanimously down.
Now we are counting on the City Council to view this re-zoning request with a healthy
dose of suspicion.
Some of the recent campaign statements are encouraging:
Mr. Sullivant is working for the residents of Orange County and not developers
and lobbyists.
Mr. Bauer wants to preserve the Integrity of our neighborhoods and
Ms. Detloff would never sacrifice the Quality of Life to continue a high level of
service to the citizens.
Apparently we are in good hands here!
Over the past two years alone, much energy and money has been wasted to ramrod this
Crest View re-zoning down our throats. And mainly because of the unfair tactics of the
Tarwater School Board has this issue turned into a bitter conflict of us vs. them. Non of
the Crest View residents have ever been consulted in the formulation of a reuse plan for
the Crest View School.
We are at the end of the road now; we have nowhere else to turn. We are asking the
Mayor& members of the City Council to defeat this re-zoning effort once and for all.
Csty_C-61 I I f3(VY6mCk
CJ✓nc. L.
To Whom It May Concern:
RECEIVED
DEC 0 2 1998
I thought that we were interested in the beautification of Beach Blvd. I had read tf)EPAVOMENT OF PLANNING
were talking about cleaning up some of the store fronts along Beach.......Then I hear talk
that a Wal-Mart is being planned for the corner of Beach and Talbert.....What gives?
On one weekend it could be a gigantic Budget car sales lot, and then on the other
weekends it could turn into a big of campground. What gives,I thought we werAd, -
looking to beautify Beach Blvd?
�E J V t D Frt?m u) I a I»s
Z
m
C-3 C
Cr
Dear City Council Member,
Shame on Huntington Beach....we have been so busy with the `crown jewel' that we lost
to Orange a Vans Skatepark,Hilo Hatties, Sketchers...a couple of.these along with a
Jamba Juice and the Ron Jons could have been great at the Crest View Site! A skatepark
and some shops for the kids WOW!
But all we might get is another place to get cheap clothes,toilet paper, napkins, paper
towels, soda pop, plastic white furniture, and wood furniture in a box...the same old stuff
that we can get any where else. No wonder a good deal of the people in Huntington
Beach leave to shop in other cities.
Our kids need something to do! Please look to other options before we cover the land at
Crest View with just another `run in and get some soda pop, hairspray, and cat food' Big
Box.
Thank You.
Mr. Scott Williamson
5
C'33 LLJ
f_3 �
Z
®rIL;'
'na t aStore --i u
�
RV Drivers Cam never stayed at Wal-Mart before
p leaving Independence,Mo.,on their
Out in Parking Lots way to visit their son and datighteil
in-law near Spokane, Wash.— but'
they had heard they would be wel-
The Associated Press come.
BOZEMAN,Mont.—The big Wal- "We didn't know it was going to be'
Mart signs along the nation's high- like this," Nyla Austin said,-eyeing
ways are attracting more than shop- the three RVs and two fifth-wheel
pers. trailers congregated at the far end
The expansive parking lots have of the parking lot.
become an overnight refuge for The couple's Gulf Stream.Scenic
weary travelers, drivers of recre- Cruiser, complete with beige,
ational vehicles who know they leather upholstery and a full bath-.;
won't be turned away while stop- room, has everything necessary.to;
ping for the night. make an overnight stay in a parking;
The store doesn't advertise that lot tolerable. It was the couple's
the welcome mat is out,but the poli- third Wal-Mart stay.
cy is known among travelers. Charlie Blackwell, of Poncha�
"Our parking lots are reserved for toula,La.,had never stayed in Via.:,
our customers,so if they shop there Mart before pulling into Montana in.,
they can stay there," said Laura his 30-foot Allegro motor home.;
Pope, a national Wal-Mart spokes- Montana's big sky filled the Alle,
woman. gro's high north-facing windshield:
"It's kind of word-of-mouth Inside,Blackwell pecked at a la
among RVers," said Carol Wiesner, top computer as his traveling'cdnv�
who said she and her husband,Carl, panion, Dorothy Lippin; frohdhW
have stayed in more Wal-Mart park- up. Jan. 12, the day Blackwell left'
ing lots than they can count during Louisiana, marked the first, time
their three-plus years on the road. he'd traveled west of Houston:
If it wasn't for the discount chain, If the stop is more than a couple'dt
in some towns they wouldn't have a days, Blackwell said, he prefets,
place to stay,the couple said.Many campgrounds; their RV sites 10ft611
cities prohibit RV parking have phone jacks, and Blackwell.
overnight at city parks, and pay-to- likes to surf the Internet.
stay campgrounds often are full. Travelers who use the parkirig
Carl Wiesner said he's been lots regularly keep their campsites'
kicked out of Costco in Salt Lake clean and pick up after their pets so,
City, but never at Wal-11art or the they don't wear out their welcome,
store's corporate sibling, Sam's Carol Wiesner said.
Club. "We really appreciate it," slie-
On a recent night, the Wiesners said."I know RVers are real loyal to'
were among six campers at a Mon- Wal-Mart for what they've done for
tana Wal-Mart. us."
Parked nearby were retirees Bill Come morning, the campers are
and Nyla Austin.They said they had off to parking lots unknown.
WE'RE BA(K BY POPULAR
DEMAND01
a es
(or
. .
,
as ..
�r
y
We're back by popular demand and
with our Last Change Model Year Sale '
and are we stocked with vehicles!
We have been ordered by our corporate ' ;
office to sell-off our inventor to make `OW
room for the end-of-year cycle.We are
offering our late-model rental fleet and ' AU
off-lease vehicles direct to the public,
all at drastic savings! ,
1
NELY . ,
AID t FI
O OVER 50 MAKES &
C11�
MODELS.
�. O MOSTLY'98 '9T&'96
RENTAL FLEA OFF-LEASE et.E PECJEVEHICL vEHICLm
° NUNI�/A�Nsu`KS 96 mums
"1.9%APR for 12 months,$84.59 per$1,000 financed,25%down
payment,on approved es.All Budget sells nls plus
rental license,
special CONVERi1�LES WAGONS Car Sales
purchase a trade vehicles.All pdces/payrrtentsptus tax,license,smog
and doc fees.All financing on 2pproved credit.No dealer inquiries.
4310 E. HIGHLAND • SAN BERNARDINO, CA • EXIT OFF 1-330
WE'RE BACK BY POPULAR DEMAND IN THE INLAND
EMPIRE, SAVE THOUSAAIDS ON THE PURCHASE
OF X RENTAL FLEET OR OFF-LEASE VEHICLE.
ALP- ANW-
FUME
HERE IS A PARTIAL LISTING OF OUR INVENTORY: HURRY,OCT
�N®S
Buick Century Dodge CargoVan Ford Ranger Lincoln Town Car Plymouth Gd Voy cBuick Riviera Dodge Grand Caravan Ford Thunderbird Mercury Grand Marq.Plymouth Neon SUNDA
Buick LeSabre Dodge Intrepid Ford Taurus Mercury Mistique Pontiac Bonneville 149
Buick Park Avenue Dodge Neon Ford Windstar Mercury Sable Pontiac Grand Am �+
Buick Regal Dodge Stratus Geo Metro Mercury Tracer Toyota Cam
Buick Skylark Ford Aerostar Geo Prizm Mercury Villager Toyota Corollrya
Cadillac Deville Ford Contour GMC Safari Nissan Altima Toyota Rav 4
OVER 90% OF OUR VEHICLES ARE
198 197 & '96s RENTAL FLEET & LEASE VEHICLES!
Chevrolet Astro Ford Crown Victoria Honda Accord Nissan Maxima �( ,
Chevrolet Blazer Ford Escort Isuzu Rodeo 2WD Nissan Sentray����� „�., ,
Chevrolet Camaro Ford Aspire Isuzu Rodeo 4WD Oldsmobile Aurora ��'�"� ,
Chevrolet Cavalier Ford Explorer Jeep Grand Oldsmobile Ciera4'LC
Chevrolet Lumina Ford 15 Pass.Van Cherokee Oldsmobile Cutlass
Chevrolet Silverado Ford F-150 Lincoln Mark Vlll Plymouth Breeze
r ANCIT,
Chevrolet Tahoe Ford F-250 Lincoln Navigator ;, ' G
Chrysler LHS Ford Mustang
Exit H�ghlandAve Bud t ¢
west off
saw
r$an Wal-Mart - l ,
l _ vv
2is Bernardino °` ��°
You're Just H hland CI �`17 * 9ROFREE
Minutes ADSIDE d
m8
Away from SAT0Ct WITH EVERY °
this Sale
R land� YENiCLE
to
io �R, -�_
,o V 101 . Oct 1 8 . 10 b
�Oma untla VISIT US AT Car- Salqu..
Budget Car Sales of Victorville is a New York Stock Exchange Listed Corporation. www.budgetcarsales.com
1v3:J 30 '98-08:49 FR JOHNSOk-UKPOPINA 949 852 1466 TO 17143741557 P.02102
n
I '
RECEIVED
November 30, 1998
DEC 01 i998
Connie Brockway DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Ms. Brockway:
I am writing to voice my deep disapproval of the proposed Wal-Mart at the Crest View
School site.
I like many others have lived in Huntington Beach for many years. It is a city I grew up
in and have chosen to raise my children in. I understand the cities desire to increase the
sales tax base but not at the expense of the homeowners, businesses and mourners of the
local cemetery.
The school district has let this location go down the drain. It looks like something that
belongs in a very bad neighborhood. I'm sure that is mare reason for the citizens and
council members to want have a change. I would love to see a park and community
center, but I also live in the "real"world. The best compromise for the city, school
district and citizens in and around the si to is to sell the property to a home developer.
This way the school district will receive funds from the sale of the property. The city will
receive funds from property tax as well as increased sales tax from the new residents
spending more dollars in Huntington Beach. The surrounding neighborhood will benefit
from not having the noise, pollution and constant increased traffic as well as getting rid of
an "eyesore."
Please listen to what your chosen members of the planning commission have
recommended. Vote NO can Wal-Mart for the sake of our community.
Thank you,
Marianne Biedermann _=.
8402 Tradewind Circle '
Huntington Beach, CA 92646 `w4 �� _7
(714) 847-2128 Uj
cc: Ralph Bauer Peter Green Dave Sullivan _
Shirley Dettloff Tom Harmon ,'-
Dave Garofalo Pam Julien ,
+::+ TOTAL PAGE.02
N149
N ACH
� �N ig
,41
T
U
0C 1998
,... !
October 8, 1998
Dear City Council of Huntington Beach,
I am a resident of Huntington Beach and, at first, was not sure if 1 wanted a Wal-Mart store
in my city. I have found out, with a little research of my own, that the money that the store
will provide for our Oceanview School District is badly needed.
The money will help the 30-year-old school district with repairs of leaking roofs, bad heating
and air conditioning and many other things. The money will also update computers used by
the students and staff.
It is unfortunate that our Huntington Beach School facilities fall far behind other local cities,
but I think that with the new Wal-Mart store we can begin to change some of this. Our
Huntington Beach children deserve more than we are currently providing for them.
Thank you for your time and I hope you take my suggestion into consideration.
Sincerely,
_`-�
Lin a Dinger
16772 Leafwood Circle
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
October 9, 1998
Stacy Freeberg
The Huntington Beach Independent
18682 Beach Blvd., Ste. 160
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Stacy,
I am a Huntington Beach resident who happens to like Wal-Mart. My family has
grown up on Wal-Mart. We don't want to pay full price for the items we purchase on
a weekly basis. Wal-Mart has been good to us in the past and I think the new store
that you are considering will do the same.
If the City decides to build the Huntington Beach Wal-Mart I'm sure that most of the
people in our city will shop there as well.
Sincerely,
Sherry Thatcher
15162 Yorkshire Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
0 C T 2 1998
\ r;
5711- Mangrum Drive
Huntington Beach,
California 9264c
November 6, 1G98
City Planning and Zoning
City of Huntington Beach
P.Q. Box 190
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
Dear Sirs:
I am a 36 year resident of our fair city.
We need a dal-Mart store in our community.
A lot of us are not paid union scale wages
or benefits and we are on 'budgets. Cur
utility bills alone have escalated with new
taxes, surcharges, new trash and recycling
fees that I think could have been curtailed
if we had had the foresight to encourage
businesses to settle here instead of promoting
the bedroom community we now have.
I well remember how we failed with Price
Club via our meandering and haggling and now -
Fountain Valley is reaping the bootie. The
question is : do we or do we not want the
400,000 or so dollars in sales tax in our
coffers or not? .
I for one will shop Tidal-Mart whether it be
in Westminster, Fountain Valley or our own
Huntington Beach. Parks and unused schools do
not generate income ! Wal-Mart is knocking at
our door and if we don't answer, someone else
surely will.
Very truly,
Phyllis Pearson
RECEIVED ,
N O V 0 91998
DEPAFtTPJENT OF
COM,AUNITY DEVELOPMENT
JAMES R GALLAGHER
21562 Kaneohe Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Oct 30, 1998
Shirley Dettloff, Mayor
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach CA 92648
Dear Shirley
Sylvia and I urge you to disregard the recommendation of the Planning Commission about
not giving WalMart a building permit for their proposed store at Talbert and Beach. We both
think that a WalMart store should be built in Huntington Beach for the following reasons:
1. While it is true that some citizens in the area will be impacted by the store adjoining their
property,the vast majority of people in Huntington Beach and nearby surrounding cities
will have a store nearby that carries a very extensive line of merchandise at very reasonable
prices. We travel several months of the year and when in strange towns we always seek
out a WalMart store because we know their selection of merchandise is enormous and that
we will get excellent value there for our money. Retired people and people living near the
poverty level need a store like Walmart to make their money go farther.
2. The city's sales tax income from such a store would be very substantial and will help the
city keep solvent. We have always regretted that a Price Club store was not approved and
built in Huntington Beach. Now we find it very inconvenient for us to drive over to the far
side of Fountain Valley to shop at Price Club. And think of the thousands of sales tax
dollars from us Huntington Beachers that Fountain Valley is now getting instead of going
into our city coffers.
3. We are people who like to get up early in the morning and get started early. Having a store
like WalMart that would be open very early in the morning would be a godsend to those of
us who like to get started early. Now when we find we need something early in the
morning we have to wait around to 9:00 or 10:00 for some store to open--and after
shopping,the day is half shot for us.
4. You know that Sylvia and I are hardcore environmentalists,but we also know full well that
progress will come to Huntington Beach whether we like it or not. The proposed site is
adjoining businesses now operating on Beach Blvd. and thus will not impact as many
people as building on other sites in Huntington Beach might. And surely the store could
be positioned on the site to have the loading dock next to Talbert and away from the
adjoining residences. Further,we think that a poll of people living within a couple of miles
of the proposed WalMart would find that a large majority of residents would welcome a
store there.
Shirley,we urge you to vote to allow WalMart to build at the Talbert and Beach site if no better
site can be found in Huntington Beach. We hate to think that Huntington Beach might lose a
WalMart store when we have a good chance to get one.
Sincerely
'JaT Gallagher
Sylvia R. Gallagher
Ph. 714.962.8990
aM1n•.
I.'I 0 V i;
YES! YES!
I/we support the proposed•Huntington Beach Wal-Mart I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart
The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs, The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs,
sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district. ; sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district.
Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting i Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting
numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count i numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count
my vote in favor of the,new'Huntington Beach Wal-Mart. my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart.
(name) (name)
(address) _ `�U �t COS 1 F) 3 F--� (address)
C tM .JS��,�- C ,�Q. ` 9�,(o (city/zip code) `Q' PaChl �A JMQL�_ (city/zip code)
(signature) X (signature)
YES! YES!
I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart wt the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart
The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs, The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs,
sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district. sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district.
Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting
numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schoolsRAM&MAI D numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count
my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach WWrtl
7 1998 my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart.
C ` RECEIVED
M,,�7� EPARTM PLANNING JA M C"3 y ve 7X-1,3 A �L0C N (r�.4998
hA 6 6 l e' Zq ti E DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING(address) (address)
47AnT f16TbA) t ciY �� V
city/zip code) (city/zip code)
XC_\ X(signature)
'�" '¢'�`� (signature)
YES! YES!
Vwe support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart
The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs, The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs,
sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district. sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district.
Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting
numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count i numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count
my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart. my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart.
i S CsYS -
(name) I t�l (name)
(address) 12 (address)
(city/zip code) 1 (city/zip code)
I
(signature) I (signature)
� f
YES!
YES!
I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart
The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs, The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs,
sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district i sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district.
Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting
Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,support'
numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count
numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. ;
my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-N.... my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart.
Sa� //2 (name)
(name)
J p � Z1
7 7
/ G �( �, `�O ' ' / "� D r I A (address)
3 3 2L /� ali (address)
(city/zip cade) (cZ/zip code)
,—T
X (signature)
to-_--_ (signn re)
YES! YES!
Vwe support the proposed Hunt ° RaQ�Vlart Vwe support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart
i lN3WdOl3n3(])xNf1WWO
The new store will benefit the city by adding dAr� yq a'
The new store will benefit the city by adding mao�dpd�Q�ity jobs, sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the �
sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district. Wal-Mart will be a valuable community,truss
Wal-Mart will be a valuable commuryV rtJ�r s P° t numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. P e �nt
numerous charities,non-profit organizatiotWAA s'lr ASIP Z ea'2 count my vote in favor of the new Hunt' iNglU4
my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart. `
—EQt- � Y CL ye .S t 'l I I CkPAt e W I ll�a��-,sa n (name)
(name)
a t
-1 (01 -tL o t� Lh / v Qu l s r (address)
r � (address)
I tl+r n oir— eQch C� �07� RUAM40C) DOC' (A '1� � (city/zip code)
(city/zip code)
Xa z X �
(signature) � (signature)
i
YES! YES!
Vwe support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart Vwe support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart
The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs,
The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs, i sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district.
sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district. Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting
Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting
numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count
m my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart.
y vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart.
j'Q'K (name)
Robert D.Runyard
(name)
5451 Old Pirate Lane,
Hunt / _ /_ Z T r
Huntington Beach, ��1-7
(address)
CA 92649-3608 (address)
" � f Z�di-7�UI•oh eff2 n ' a-A C,s-� �l4 (city/zip code)
(city/zip code)
g X d� �� (signature)
(signature)
YES! YES!
I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart
The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs, The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs,
sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district. sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district.
Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner;supporting
numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count
my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart. my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart.
M c ,��
C�rj��' �' ►'� (name) /L l VIA'f., 25I r� + ew (name)
9_ 2."1 \ �,��2�-�h,+ �C.� (address) 1 p 5'� ao l i A _ (address)
(city/zip code) h (city/zip code)
' l
X l � - (signature) X (�LLnd- S �-b"- (signature)
y
YES!
YES.. I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart
I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart pp p p g
The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs,
The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs, sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district.
sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district. Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting
Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting numerous charities,non-profivorganizations and schools. Please count
numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart.
my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart.
acJ e
(name)
(name)
(address)
(address) &Icy AJQP( )Q--,
�U Q
�r LQ&Y
" " (city/zip code) I (city/zip code)
R
X (sienaturel (signature)
YES! YES!
I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart VU support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart
The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs, The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs,
sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district. sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district.
Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting
numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count
my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart. my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart.
Y L �Owaa
(name) .(name)
- 2--
1 � I (address) (address)
1��nn
ity/zip code) (city/zip code)
(c
(signature) (signature)
4
YES! YES!
I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart I/we support the proposed Huntington Beach Wal-Mart
The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs, The new store will benefit the city by adding much-needed quality jobs,
sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district. sales tax revenues for the city and vital funds for the school district.
Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting Wal-Mart will be a valuable community partner,supporting
numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count numerous charities,non-profit organizations and schools. Please count
my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart. my vote in favor of the new Huntington Beach Wal-Mart.
Belinda!Keller
(name)
i 5772 Garden'Groye Blvd (name)
#395
Westminster, CA 92683 (address) ��� f�1 �,[.
(address)
(city/zip code) /`/. ,1�� �-�-�o f'�O (city/zip code)
(signature) X (signature)
H-C(t ® /v
AGENDA
L,fY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JULY 14, 1998
5:00 P.M. — Room B-8
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street
/ S �Yl(\ Huntington Beach, California
5:00 P.M. — Room B-8
Call City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting To Order r f
Roll Call Julien, Harmrf, Green,�Deteoff, Bker, Sulk an, Gar�alo Public Comments Regarding Study Session Agenda Item
IVO nJ (�,
Joint Study Session Between City Council And Planning Commission —Crest View School Site/
Wal-Mart—South Side Of Talbert Avenue, 300 Feet East Of Beach Boulevard
✓
Roll Call - Planning Commission Inglie, Chapman, Tillotson, Liven ood, Ke ns, Biddle, Speaker
(City Council) Study Session —Crest View School Site/Wal-Mart—South Side Of Talbert Avenue
300 Feet East Of Beach Boulevard
1. Requested Entitlements/Project Description
2. Environmental Impact Report
3. Staff Recommendations
4. Question and Answer Discussion with City Council, Planning Commission, Arnel Retail Group, and
City Staff
�:)epa s pNPS'p'?-eP l
DS"Iss"dn h.p /d
COUNCIL/AGENCY ADJOURNMENT: To Monday, July 20, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. in Room B-8, Civic Center,
2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California
CONNIE BROCKWAY,CITY CLERK
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street-Second Floor
Huntington Beach,California 92648
Telephone: 714/536-5227
Internet: http://www.ci.huntington-beach.ca.us
t
VIA FAX
TO: Tom Love, Principal -Arnel Retail Group
FROM: Herb Fauland, Senior Planner- City of Huntington Beach
DATE: March 20, 1996
SUBJECT: CREST VIEW SCHOOL SITE
The following is a listin es/concerns expressed regarding the site plan
submitted and date /27/96 number of the issues are repeated but are
included to indicate which group/committee expressed them. Please note the
comments are general and informational based upon a "conce tual" site-plan. It
is our continued commitment to work with the site g an to pet the optimum results
for both the District/Developer and the City/Residents.
GENERAL PROJECT CONCERNS:
1. Loss of Public Space
2. Loss of Recreation Open Space
3. Loss of School Facility
4. Loss of Private Uses on-site (Learning Center, Church)
5. Compatibility/Design/Buffers
6. Access & Circulation (Pedestrian and Vehicular)
7. Fiscal Impacts (City & Local Businesses)
8. Signs P.w
9. Parking -,r.
10. Inclusion of Beach Blvd. (frontage) property
(gAschoo1s\crest7) 1
6 FU�+l!o�i()// -/l-
e-e
5I /V� `��l�f%/7'
11. Building height/shading
12. Provision of on-site open space - How much?
13. Restaurant pads/line of sight/drive -thru
PRO CT REVIEW - PLANNING STAFF COMME TS 3/5/96
Beach Blvd. frontage is critical for access and y.
2. Beach Blvd. frontage allows the project to move away from the adjacent
residential and buffer the commercial development.
3. Beach Blvd. frontage provides a better project.
4. Buffer/separation from the residential properties is inadequate.
5. Buffer should be 50' of landscaping/open space and then blockwall with
setback and parking.
6. 10°/ 'f the site should be devoted to open space. This could be part of
e 50' landscaped area.
/. Truck delivery locations are poor adjacent to the residential properties.
V6. Truck traffic and on site circulation are very poor based upon their
P
proximity to the residential properties.
9. Four (4) curb cuts along Talbert are excessive. No deep throat entrance
indicated.
Vu- Building height and shading of residential properties is a concern.
11. Signage may become a concern if no Beach Blvd. frontage is made a part
of the development. Excessive height.
12. Restaurant pads should be designed to include future drive thru
possibilities.
13. Restaurant pads may block line of site for major tenant on site.
14. Re-arranging the major tenant pads (1&2) to reduce the impacts to the
residential properties.
15. Impact of parking lot lights on the residential properties.
(g:lschoo1s\crest7) 2
16. Loss of open space/school site/uses on-site.
17. Fiscal analysis of revenue generated by proposed uses. Impacts to
existing businesses and potential competing interests with Home Depot at
Wintersburg School site.
18. Environmental processing (EIR vs Mitigated Neg Dec) and possible
impacts (traffic, noise, fiscal, air quality, water, light and glare, sewer,
etc.).
The Crest View site plan was presented to the DEVELOPMENT
AS STANCE COMMITTEE (DAC) on 3/7/96. The following are the ma"or
c ments•
The project provides no buffer to the residential. A minimum 25' should
be proposed.
Open Space should be provided on site. 2-3 acre park to act as a buffer.
3. Truck traffic and noise from loading areas.
4. Push major#1 closer to Beach or flip layout with major#1 adjacent to
Beach with parking with buffer adjacent to residential.
5. Traffic impacts at Beach and Talbert are an issue. A street light will most
likely be necessary at one of the central access locations along Talbert.
6. Include Beach Blvd. frontage.
7. Signage
8. Fiscal Impacts
9. Insufficient parking
The plan was also presented to the ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
COMMITTEE (EDC) on 3/8/96. Basically, the plan needs to be creative in its
buffers and not a typical layout. The proposed site plan was given little
support as submitted.
(g:\schoo1s\crest7) 3
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS:
The following are the environmental issues. Staffs position is to process an
Environmental Impact Report because a number of the issues may not be
mitigable to a level of insignificance.
1. Traffic Impacts***
2. Air Quality Impacts**
3. Water Impacts***
4. Light and GlareNiews*
5. Soils/Grading/Drainage/Sewer Impacts*
6. Noise Impacts***
7. Animal Life Impacts*
8. Aesthetics Impacts*
9. Open Space/Recreation Impacts**
10. Energy Impacts*
11. Public Services (Fire, Police) Impacts*
12. Housing and Population Impacts*
* Impact anticipated to be mitigable to a level of insignificance.
** May not be mitigable to a level of insignificance, may require a
Statement of Overriding Consideration.
*** Specific project impacts need to be assessed through studies.
PLEASE NOTE: Additional comments and concerns may be raised
upon submittal of a specific project proposal.
(gAscnoo1s\cresc7) 4
} e-
f' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: Melanie S. Fallon, Community Development Director
FROM: Herb Fauland, Senior Planne*
DATE: March 12, 1996
SUBJECT: Crest View - Wedin's Summary of Issues
You have asked me to critique the faxed letter dated February 26, 1996, from
Wayne Wedin to Jim Tarwater. Specifically you wanted me to review, 1} the list
of what the city wants from the project, 2} processing time, and 3} staffs CEQA
determination. The following are my comments:
T. The list of items that Wayne provides is generally the same as the list
generated by the city.
2. Processing time will be approximately 6 - 9 months. This is from the date
of submittal to City Council hearing. Staff time and resources are a
concern and may modify the timeframe.
a. Staffs CEQA determination is that an EIR should be prepared. ,A number
of issues may not be mitigable to a level on insignificance or appear to
require specific studies to assess the impacts. Also, because of the large
public outcry, staff felt the proper environmental review up front will save
time and be legally defensible in the long run.
4. The goals identified in your February 29, 1996 memo should be
forwarded to Arnel/District. EDC concurred with the memo on 3/8/96.
S. The Council needs a quality project to support that is unique and
mitigates impacts to the greatest extent feasible.
6. The list of comments from the Planners, DAC, EQC etc. (dated 3/11/96)
that I prepared-should be addressed and or responded to. These issues
will be items that we will have to defend throughout the entitlement
process.
(g:\schools\cresffi)
Crest View - Wedin's Comments
March 12, 1996
Page Two
7. Possible concurrent processing of Rancho View will put a strain on staff
resources.
As you've indicated, 1 think we need to continue to push for a quality project that
is unique in design and provides compatibility to the surrounding residential
homes- .If we do not, we will not get the support from the City Council.
xc: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director
(9:\schoo1s\crest6)
FE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: Melanie S. Fallon, Community Development Director
FROM: Herb Fauland, Senior Planner
DATE: March 11, 1996
SUBJECT: CREST VIEW SCHOOL SITE
The following are issues/concerns expressed regarding the site plan submitted
and dated 2/27/96. A number of the issues are repeated but are included to
indicate which group/committee expressed them.
GENERAL PROJECT CONCERNS:
1. Loss of Public Space
2. Loss of Recreation Open Space
3. Loss of School Facility
4. Loss of Private Uses on-site (Learning Center, Church)
5. Compatibility/Design/Buffers
6. Access & Circulation (Pedestrian and Vehicular)
7. Fiscal Impacts (City & Local Businesses)
8. Signs
9. Parking
10. Inclusion of Beach Blvd. (frontage) property
11. Building height/shading
12. Provision of on-site open space - How much?
(gAschoo1s\crest5) 1
13. Restaurant pads/line of sight/drive - thru
PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS 3/5/96
1. Beach Blvd. frontage is critical for access and visibility.
2. Beach Blvd. frontage allows the project to move away from the adjacent
residential and buffer the commercial development.
3. Beach Blvd. frontage provides a better project.
4. Buffer/separation from the residential properties is inadequate.
5. Buffer should be 50' of landscapir*open space and then blockwall with
setback and parking.
6. 10% of the site should be devoted to open space. This could be part of
the 50' landscaped area.
7. Truck delivery locations are poor adjacent to the residential properties.
8. Truck traffic and on site circulation are very poor based upon their
proximity to the residential properties.
9. Four (4) curb cuts along Talbert are excessive. No deep throat entrance
indicated.
10. Building height and shading of residential properties is a concern.
11. Signage may become a concern if no Beach Blvd. frontage is made a part
of the development. Excessive height.
12. Restaurant pads should be designed to include future drive thru
possibilities.
13. Restaurant pads may block line of site for major tenant on site.
14. Re-arranging the major tenant pads (1&2) to reduce the impacts to the
residential properties.
15. Impact of parking lot lights on the residential properties.
T6. Loss of open space/school site/uses on-site.
(9:lschoo1slcrest5) 2
17. Fiscal analysis of revenue generated by proposed uses. Impacts to
existing businesses and potential competing interests with Home Depot at
Wintersburg School site.
18. Environmental processing (EIR vs Mitigated Neg Dec) and possible
impacts (traffic, noise, fiscal, air quality, water, light and glare, sewer,
etc.).
The Crest View site plan was presented to the DAC on 3/7/96. The
following are the major comments:
1. The project provides no buffer to the residential. A minimum 25' should
proposed.
2. Open Space should be provided on site. 2-3 acre park to act as a buffer.
3. Truck traffic and noise from loading areas.
A. Push major closer to Beach or flip layout with Major adjacent to Beach
with parking with buffer adjacent to residential.
5. Traffic impacts at Beach and Talbert are an issue. A street light will most
likely be necessary at one of the central access locations.
6. Include Beach Blvd. frontage.
7. Signage
8. Fiscal Impacts
9. Insufficient parking
The plan was also resented to the EDC on 3/8/96. The same basic
comments were girren a Council Members. Basically, the plan needs
to be creative in its buffers and not be a typical layout. The proposed site
plan had no support!
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS:
The following are the environmental issues. Staff's position is to process an
Environmental Impact Report because a number of the issues may not be
mitigable to a level of insignificance.
1. Traffic Impacts"""
(g:\schoo1s\crest5) 3
2. Air Quality Impacts**
3. Water Impacts***
4. Light and GlareNiews*
5. Soils/Grading/Drainage/Sewer Impacts*
6. Noise Impacts***
7. Animal Life Impacts*
8. Aesthetics Impacts*
9. Open Space/Recreation Impacts**
10. Energy Impacts*
11. Public Services (Fire, Police) Impacts*
12. Housing and Population Impacts*
* Impact anticipated to be mitigable to a level of insignificance.
** May not be mitigable to a level of insignificance, may require a
Statement of Overriding Consideration.
*** Specific project impacts need to be assessed through studies.
NOTE: Additional comments and concerns may be raised upon
submittal of a specific project proposal.
xc: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director
(g:1,schoo1s\crest5) 4
FECITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator
David Biggs, Economic Development Director
Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director
Herb Fauland, Senior Planner
FROM: Melanie S. Fallon, Community Development Director}7�
SUBJECT: CRESTVIEW GOALS
DATE: February 29, 1996
The following list is our preliminary identification of major requirements that the City should
require of a commercial development on the Crestview School site:
• Not a mini-mall, but a major retail sales tax generator
• Beach Boulevard frontage
• Creative buffering system which also mitigates noise impacts on community
• Nfitigation of truck delivery impacts on the community
• Uses and design which foster livability
• High quality architectural and landscaping(creative drought tolerant)
Crest View School Site
Proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
for Commercial Use
TENTATIVE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
PUBLIC HEARING DATE
Planning Commission Tentatively August 11,
Public Hearing 1998
City Council Public Tentatively August 31,
Hearing 1998
TIMES AND DATES NOTED ABOVE ARE
TENTATIVE AND MAY BE AMENDED. NOTICES
FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE MAILED TO
INTERESTED PARTIES AND SURROUNDING
PROPERTY OWNERS WHEN THE ABOVE DATES
ARE CONFIRMED.
D
slOINT r�LANNING COMMISSIOit.`IT�'' CQUNCIL
p
T UD �SS�Q11l,�ACrE�1T
S
Room B-8-Civic Center
I. CREST VIEW SCHOOL SITE/WAL*MART—Jane Madera/JoAnn Hadfield,PCR
A. Requested Entitlements/Project Description 5:00 PM—5:05 PM
1) General Plan Amendment: Proposal to amend current designation of P(RI,-7) (Public
with an underlying land use designation of Low Density Residential) to CG-F1 (General
Commercial-maximum floor area ratio of 0.35)
2) Zoning Map Amendment: Proposal to amend current designation of PS (Public-
Semipublic)to CG (General Commercial)
3) Conditional Use Permit: Proposal to permit development of an approximate 135,000
square foot Wal*Mart with an approximate 9,500 square foot garden center along with
three retail/restaurant pads ranging from 3,500 square feet 5,500 square feet
4) Tentative Parcel Map: To subdivide the current 13.89 acre site into four parcels
5) Environmental Impact Report: To analyze and disclose the potential environmental
impacts associated with the above noted requests
B. Environmental Impact Report 5:05 PM—5:10 PM
1) Drainage
2) Transportation/Circulation
3) Air Quality
4) Noise J
5) Aesthetics
6) Recreation
7) Unavoidable Significant Adverse Impacts
♦ Land Use(Loss of Community Open Space and Land Use Compatibility)
♦ Air Quality
♦ Aesthetics
C. Staff Recommendations 5:10 PM—5:15 PM
1) Relocate and Enclose Truck Loading and Unloading Docks
2) Reduce Perimeter Wall to Maximum 8 Feet High
3) Incorporate High Quality Architecture,Building Materials,Landscaping,Pedestrian
Links
4) Use of Building should Wal*Mart vacate
5) Maximum 10%of floor area devoted to non-taxable sales items
6) Public Art
D. Question and Answer Discussion with City Council,Planning Commission,Arnel Retail
Group,and Staff 5:15 PM—5:45 PM
E. Public Comments 5:45 PM—6:00 PM
spy sasstoM
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General;
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address ���
r
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
.of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signattieje)
Name Address F j
� z7��
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi. Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request ,the :City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signatur4
c (sf-k\ (`o V7 L--old Q-t rCJe
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
F
ignature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City' of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(signature)
4L�ISC �, 16 F1
Name Address
r
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach .
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General;
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
V
(Signature)
Name Address _
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This, would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of-the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
Vr,pnm t
(Signature)
ame Address
&'ot 633
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, .its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
r 1
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing.zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
N CAL
Name Address t'Iu Az;,
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de. Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View.School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
E
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We ',request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
I
Nam`e Address
To: The City Council and Mayor. of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We -,request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
�UZ'�'� l/(.;�L"( V"� I � �� l.sC �L''---• l� �lt I�--v�2- °�-c�
Name Address ��
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
G� U) `
(Signature)
k4,
Name Address a2(�
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This, would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
�Ve ueu &ql ptfp�,upw W,019rMINt'2 Iel
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We.request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow- commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signa re)
D-7
Tl�
�C
V ( it
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This_ would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
.2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
eoP� fit6- u)t 1 Nivrfl�P- co, qz�3
Name Address
J
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street ;
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
J
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
CaR& RP maA hur.� ms{ wi'O
Name Address ,,C 4, az��
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact SL
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the.parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Cef
Name Address 9� b
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
r
h4lft2�—
(Signature)
Drow Goa cg . 9�6 y3
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul .Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council. to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Rau cH
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This ,would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
isigIna re)
j
Name Address r
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
4`00111�4
(Signature)
K,'Yv, - 9M ` `r
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevara4 and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signatur
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This I would severely impact St:
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
r
(Sig ature)
Ya z#NNe-@I B dR!Q�b i -
Name Address
q � � 0
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the. Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
S
(Signature)
�IC J1 .5an)�a
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to-rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Si re)
Name Address
To: The. City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St: Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact SL
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address ruslA- lam_ �����
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
-As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the trdffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This-would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
Werequest the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential areas.
. (Signature)
AI-; Se4l'Z k /7-7 A ti 54, F U
Name Address
1
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This .would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We, request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
4a o
Name Address i
r
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General.
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
a n -12 Q4/7 7c> J
ame Address
1
/a2 d
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
:of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
'nattire)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would-severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St:
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature).
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
��,qa
Name Address,
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
Wi request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
r
(Signature)
C
Name Address=�� _
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of,Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
L `� J �cc 0 v--� � ( b cam.)I-e 7�
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Addressv R�
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We- request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address f 4
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
Signa re)
e-
r ,
MiwH Barr' �� 6�� .
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We 'request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
( ignature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
/9/2L�
(Signature)
z2U/?y ,plc 66 d r-,R—'�' 84 eh A-pf0 G 115
Name Address k,� - s l -, Ca
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City. Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature
Name Address
l
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(S4nature) J
Z�� c�� / 736 -7 A, b�� e
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We -request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
'5 T'I A)L
Name Address v�-
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning.
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Sig re)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
, U
(Sign to e)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach.
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
S gnature)
'lavine I s SSA kkhmold. �(,' c?g v�-
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We-request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of-the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
gri6a - r_er:�y C'r.
Name Address` &UY4n �( IIC�
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
( nature)
J6��M,) In 2A q 2(,Z,�Z
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St .Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
21�
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest Vew School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site.for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This . would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We rrequest the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signatu )
Z'Z7Yjl-
FV
Na e Address q� ��
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
am,D, Kt Yo ckry kv r) 6 �j 0(3 L2e-c kev— Ave."
Name Address r Uw�-Q ;
o `�
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners:
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We,,request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Si nature)
Name Address ��3
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail'purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
rign�ature)
;��� (ems �( ce 2 F �l
`,se. , e I l v ni < r K
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
/x7r,/,101�f
Name Address �/ C(� �� o
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
Name Address �2(�83
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We .,request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signa )
Name Address 9Z��3
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This,would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We.-request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
ignature)
3 1-e r-jQ RA c-& Clpc4�!
Name Address 4Ile
19L�G�
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We .-request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
Ngjlatur
e)
Name Address c it 9)-Jog
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest Vew School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
=( ign re
Nam Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(SignaturiT
fz3o O z �� cam• F��
Name Address 60t- 9z 72-8
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
/10
Name Address C/- 9-2 CV-3
To: The -City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development.of this residential area.
( ignature)
Name Address% �� ,- . P
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We 'request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
L L e /7d RO o Jul) b
Name Address tq e
To: .The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
Ngnature)
Name , A'ddress
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Sig re)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest Vew School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Sig ature)
,S'�r6 v-7'- .1 :5-2
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4; 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General.
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
(� , �G Uy�/i� g S��l /-1�?/vFT i I`�U�n'h�G�•� /���-/.
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential.area.
(Signature)
A-k C t *�R&�
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church; its activities, and the parishioners.
'We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington. Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signa re)
Name Address �4. 1'5 - 9;.64'7
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
/C Ley
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address —Mp-w �Z��
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul .Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We 'request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
ot�
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
.of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
ILL Z"
(Signature)
h\A" U-0
Name Address
To: The City. Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St., Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We `request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest. View .School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
ignature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the trdffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of"the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
4ignature)
E `i � � � 7 rR6-c )3iZ6 D/K ter/
Name Address ��
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We -request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of-the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
A01"
(S' nature)
�td#* f e re e-t— b
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
iA j P4�
gnature
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We -request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
y /d A1,AJ0 a 7,57_??
Name Address AA Z7
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Sign4rgy
leza,uz ze-d Cc
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Sign re)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the. traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signatu )`
!9 eu Z /�3
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
( Signatur
�Ob�-[C C2 (0�7-Ao �62 dt �P( �C Y
Name Address
r
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General:
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
AYA) C-9— _4K,(__,�
Name Address `
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest Vew School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We '-request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
CI
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
,As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(kgna��',
iincv// a(-.\ \A�
Name Address c -o
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
G�
� � I�- StLCV\
Name Address
�-
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
I
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington. Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
O�J-51
(Signature)
Ll n ba 0 1311-3 Sp-cond rV CA 021
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA. 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address qZ_
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
Ozg;�&ture)
Name Address c - 7�
To: The City Council .and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest. View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial Genera
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
IL
ignature)
y
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to, Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
GGLY, Q 3 s-/_ /,n 0'
Name'- Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St:
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We ;request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We .request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
22:n
(Signature)
Name Address z �
i
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the trdffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
VincentOr Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We requesi"the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to. not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
l7 " / l do -
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We ,,request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
,1041 �
(Si �ature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to. rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :-,request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor ,of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the.
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We ;{request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Nanie Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We=request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
( ignature)
Name TAddress
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature
Name Address ut
-� �cj, qo
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial Genera
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
''We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General:
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
,oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, 'its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Sig e)
Nanvel Address. ,
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Rs 6 V Pt Q-6: uoc-
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St: Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase .the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We -request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
Signature)
77.
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development,of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
( ignature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St: Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We .request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
ignature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, 1
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property,from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We -request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of'the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
cam.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We .request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the. Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
l 7f
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We ;request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Oigna re)
�os�
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest Vew School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We .;request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Si tur
A6 �2La7
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
On n
( nature)
/ V J113
N e Address �'� `
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, '1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach.
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
22
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
k �-- -1101 P-t,-N h�b D R. 11 �u � C,6 9 2 G4 7
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington. Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes ,
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
I P-LL i jAli i 0 U-5/4, 15-11.2 tt-14'2Z-I ilt IN, I � �
Name Address �A � z
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
l v
Name Address
J
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
J :
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. . This would severely impact St.
Vincent de. Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
Y (AV
(Signa re)
Name Address
bit vi &a�/k C,�q
%�6
To: The. City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View .School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We ,request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signa re)
1
tit '.C'o W �' -�" ��N\ LT-o N' tg 5'6 L c) K i y p a
b`� $
Name Address 1
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of SL Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This. would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address J�
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
'We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address /; �� _ �,2 C. y
8
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevari4 and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
yt,- 4�� k, Cd-
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
ignature)
.4yolc/ le-7v P'19rre)-j
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
gna re)
vfs L Kti.fr 4ve Tr , -3.
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low. Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and_ the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Sig ature)�
Name Address �� g C,4
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
.Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
i
(Signatur 1
q24
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
Name Address gal , ,
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of SL Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
� ignatu
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648.
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of SL Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General:
,The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We..request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signaturef
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Addres
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
d A CA
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach,, CA 92648
. o
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
*ignature)
� P .
Name Address
�v
�'
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We, request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date:' February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
4at
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
�- U t S z 3
Name Address
I
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Q[ Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signiiturefl
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de .Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We irequest the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
0�
3 ; .
/%I
Signa re)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address-
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
12dIJ 4
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
S' ature
S �Oah'uie M.UV-Dh, Y/5 -2�2
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent,de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(S' nature)
Name Address ��
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
6
(Szgnaiure)
Ar
a m e Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest Vew School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
r,2
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name J Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to, rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General,
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the :City,-:Council to maintain. the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
dA4 ' lxux'A -A,
(Signathrey
Name Address l �"�
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St:
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
.We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
-6�-kna re)
Name Address
To: ' The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this- residential area.
(Signature)
9 fAw ��-
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street >
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington. Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
ignature)
0�//,Z 5;P"vj(- C Kc T—
Name Address AL,(A/rxlv�ro,/
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach;'s plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone .the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Si ature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Sign re)
Aff
Namei Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
A6� e-
(Signature)
NALef���-
ame Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
-of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
o
cvoN � �� g8' � fA-DAfts )�P,
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Sig4ni ure)
U I TA Y 5,4W4 PO R- *act— Q c - -f4 P 1
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's. plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Si natu e)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signa re)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on. Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
S r
(Signature
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
,We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
4wr-a 0. 54-cUt F9 �2
Name ddress
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Sign Lure)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
developme f this residential area.
(Signature)
XZ///
Namel Addres
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
( ignature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2006 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We -request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
o•�
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
er"Al 6 Iy2w-9 CO- 4tAe 16ozelc.
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date:, February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
J
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact SL
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signa e)
KAey Z-,AZ
Name Address
9
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
((�ignature)
,3 ArnC-1-5 k5P AA-5 f?Lo l RA�.UCs G N
Name Address Hti 3 U/ C.4.
ya 6� 7
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
,4 )" Uvei2 g,5
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
P �
Name Address c�
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest Vew School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address ,
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning .
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
ow�
(Signature)
Name Address y���7
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose. the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
v
(Signature)
x/U.'
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
r , '
d
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signaturef
Name Address r
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We ;request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
'ff"j� 14 2dq�l .
(Signature)
fte-
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
i
J04 r � L�I �c��f L-, (e-el L,fl
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington_Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
77
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St: Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the.
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St:
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
OU luel vat 17 5WI' IWIPFIA)WO U 3&"
Name Address GR- 26 � 7
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signatur ,
Name Address �,� y�G 147
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of A Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
t.
rya A .- � � 9/) 1 /,A
T
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View .School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
QQuu ewi 1 OQVe,
T
Namil Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We :request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
Oignature�
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
1�fLts TID-A Wjf
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on .Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We .:request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
l
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We .request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
.of the Crest View School site, .and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
&IZL
(Signature) `
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic.on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
L�W 0 L) NaW (4 I b$O( c u6 �-Nl
Name Address o CI k(O q 7
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Pro �� N
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial Generab
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of-the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
MORUS R31
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner -of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signs re)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: ' February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
�U� n/
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on. Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We -request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
z � 6 Da da - �
T
Name Address g '-)
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
4el_
lgnature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
j
(Signature)
Cc, 0�7
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
b
-7C° CO/ 6 9�6Y- .
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
r
(Signature)GF--�
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
.As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
q Lj
(Signature)
q�v7
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of SL Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact SL
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature) �---�
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We .request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
g re)
J0`( S,4 (,JkfpDrL- IK�B� J�(,[�/CIf2c'L�F 7�-?t i 4 P,
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Oi Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General;
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We. request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
V41i LE I F�2c�) M I F y
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan .to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We ;request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
CZ, -11h ol 4,1
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St:
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
l
I -
Sign re)
Name Address
i .
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest New School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We ,request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General:
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
Signature)
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest Vew School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We ;request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
r.
(Signature)
/U Ii )t�
I IV
Name Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
(Signature)
Name e Address
To: The City Council and Mayor of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Date: February 4, 1996
NO! To Commercial Development Of Crest View School!
As a parishioner of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, I
oppose the City of Huntington Beach's plan to rezone the
Crest View School property from Low Density
Residential/Public-Semi Public use to Commercial General
The development of this site for commercial/retail purposes',
would increase the traffic on Talbert Avenue, Beach
Boulevard, and other streets. This would severely impact St.
Vincent de Paul Church, its activities, and the parishioners.
We request the City Council to maintain the existing zoning
of the Crest View School site, and to not allow commercial
development of this residential area.
g e)
,.-tit oy6 fir'
Name Address