Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
General Plan Amendment 78-2 - GPA 78-2 - Negative Declaratio
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78= 2 October 1978 w . huntington beach planning department RESOLUTION NO. 1236 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C014MISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN 78-2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with changing community needs and objectives, and WHEREAS, amendments to the Land Use Element and Circulation Element are necessary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan and, WHEREAS, the Planning Staff recommends the following amendment to the Land Use Element: That 2 .00 acres located south of Warner Avenueand east of Leslie Lane, as indicated in Figure 2. 2 , be redesignated from Low Density Residential to Commercial , and WHEREAS, the Planning Staff recommends the following amendment to the Circulation Element: That the segment of Atlanta Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard be redesignated from a major arterial to a primary arterial , and WHEREAS , a public hearing on adoption of General Plan Amendment 78-2 was held by the City Planning Commission on October 17, 1978 in accordance with provisions of the State Government Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach hereby adopts said amendment to the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said amendment to the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach is recommended for adoption by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California on the 17th day of October, 1978 , by the following,;6roll call vote: AYES: Higgins, Russell , Stern, Finley, Bazil , Cohen NOES : None ABSENT: Paone ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: James W. Palin /Ruth Finley Acting Secretary Chairman t a i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. 0 INTRODUCTION 1 1. 1 Methodology 1 2 . 0 AREAS OF CONCERN 3 2 . 1 South of Warner Avenue and East of Leslie Lane 4 2 . 2 South of Warner Avenue and East of Bolsa Chica Street 10 ! 2 . 3 Atlanta Avenue from Beach Boulevard to Lake Street 19 i i 3 . 0 A14ENDMENT SUMMARY 23 3 . 1 Area by Area Summary 23 3 . 2 Summary of Proposed General Plan Amendment 78-2 24 APPENDIX A Environmental Documents 25 APPENDIX B Dunbar Street Petitions 47 r 1. 0 INTRODUCTION This document constitutes an amendment to the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements. All previous amendments are reflected in the December 1976 General Plan Land Use Diagram as amended in 1977 and 1978 and Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways. 1. 1 Methodology This amendment to the General Plan is designed to investigate some areas where changing conditions require consideration of past decisions. The changes considered in this amendment derive from requests from property owners and the Planning Commission. In Section 2. 0 Planning Issues, each area of concern is discussed in terms of the existing conditions and impact on surrounding areas as well as consistency with City goals and policies. Section 3. 0 summarizes the recommendations contained in Section 2 . 0 in the form of a comprehensive text and plan to be adopted. 1 Land Use Categories RESIDENTIAL Estate <_2 un/gac Estate <_4 un/gac ® ,FP Low Density <_7 un/gac FM ®Medium Density <_15 un/gac Sf N qFW .�\ High Density >15 un/gac \ COMMERCIAL ®General �c �! Office Professional ®� ®Mixed Development flii, • O INDUSTRIAL Genera OR `b EEEEiEEEEEiEiEEiE:EeEEEiEiEiEEEiEEiEE2iEEi . bh asi-public, Institutional PUBLIC USE .....®. Pu 'c 6Zu ' : open Space PLANNING:::::::::::::::: :::: ::::::::::::::::::::: : . . ::::::: `�o TS Z: \ .............................. C] arming IReser e ........... \•::::::::::::.....:::::::::::::::::::::::::• ; ;: _; •:�•• ::::::::• ;; , ':.: Planned Community OTHER USES .......... ::: �, ......•••• Resource Production �P ® r� .......... . n. .... ....... n Ir rift i x ............. J . ..EE - -- - oaf-L'Y� '`:s•- a A c _ ' •. •�fi q 1'�..+a': ra _ . r F i C s.r A .t b a. r rJr / . ..;•. 1 ... ... [.: ...._b. fin i. n. .. .Y. .� ...0 r .- .� ... �•:. ::� ': ��f;%ip":J}.: _ ✓�i }w �. ,�4 x.rr 7j��'� Ww _ _ -- - - J.,�ry ls.,r\: .::.+•::;t. ..art{"{ :: ..•: .. �� � �__ 4}[fG JI'a 9 ��•I• /�•••� ����yi v-n F.•i<':S`l''r'? _� 01 PACK PACWC - •'eJ OCEAN HUNfINGTON 1364CH, (A- LIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN NT LAND USE DIAGRAM PWNNING DEPARTME Adopted December 1976 Revised AUGUST 1978 t ti 2. 0 AREAS OF CONCERN General Plan Amendment 78-2 addresses two areas of concern located in the vicinity of Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street as well as an amendment to the Circulation Element on Atlanta Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard.. These items are shown in Figure 2-1. 3 i 2 . 1 South of warner Avenue; East of Leslie Lane 2 . 1. 1 Background The area of concern consists of a vacant 2. 00 gross acre site located on the south side of Warner Avenue, immediatel east of Leslie Lane (Figure 2-2) . The property owner has requested that the General Plan be amended from the exist- ing low density residential designation to commercial to allow the development of two offi.ce professional buildings of approximately 8000 square feet apiece. The vacant site is surrounded by single family development to the east, medium density fourplexes to the south, and a 10 ,000 square foot office building to the west across Leslie Lane. Property to the north across Warner Avenue is primarily vacant low density with one single family home . The area of concern has been designated low density resi- dential in the Land Use Element for many years and has remained vacant despite a number of zone changes and development proposals. The eastern half of the site was rezoned from Rl to R5 in December 1975 (ZC 75-9) at the request of the property owner. The R5 zoning was con- sidered preferable to Rl because of the site' s location on a high volume arterial, as well as the constraints on residential development created by traffic and aircraft noise impacts and substantial street dedication require- ments. The property was subsequently sold and the new owner filed Zone Change No. 76-21, requesting Rl zoning. In October 1976, the Planning Commission approved Rl-PD zoning for the entire two-acre site, adding the planned development suffix to encourage consolidation of properties and to allow greater flexibility in dealing with access,. noise attenuation setbacks, and site design. In February 1977, the property owner filed Tentative Tract 9753 and Conditional Use Permit No. 77-6 to allow a 14-lot subdivision and a 10-unit planned residential development. During the processing of these applications, a number of important issues affecting development of the property were identified. These included a deficiency in capacity of the Warner Avenue trunk sewer and the existence of an identified archaeological site on a major portion of the property. The Warner Avenue trunk sewer services an area of approxi- mately three square miles in northwest Huntington Beach, including the area of concern, a portion of the Sunset Heights area, and the entire Huntington Harbour area. The Sunset Beach Sanitary District also discharges sewage into 4 t � jy ♦� �. 1■1 P Jp+'iq POD C,'' �,.IA`• ''�,♦ ♦�` z 've 9y9 ♦�♦ m ♦ � r ` � O eGl�9�y _� PPP` � ♦�`�♦• � dq �Cq ■ ♦P` ��O �♦• '''� POP ' � O ♦ ♦• •�� e i. P♦gyp •�� Fp G1ti 2.1 I � _J • 2.2 .V _■ • ■ S /S PALM ,,.�.I.♦' S 6.3 e jORANGE PACIFIC COAST HWY m Figure 2-1 lopHUrXINGTON PLANNING DEPARTME(1LIFORNIA AREAS OF CONCERN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 v MEDIUM .. :... . N ....... . ..DENSITY .................. ... LOW -a DENSITY m ..........,. _ ....... MEDIUM DENSITY a . COMMERCIAL ~ r..,...,_,_..--..,.y...._ _ _R _- - �..... .......,...«`... .... € t �_......... i ' - -.... ... i _ E -71 i S t 3 i .............. ............. .............. ..............:. ............... - 5 � __j }E C ......_... .. 'I TL 1 E _... MEDIUM LOW DENSITY _ LOU! � �, DENSITY ,._.; �.. .. �.-_ ..... i . ..._ .._........: ....1.__3........ ._.........._.......-......._. S _ EN ITY1 1 _ _ ... . ._..........M....... t r' _ t r j s...�._.�. �...3... f j I HIGH f DENSITY ....._E....... .... .. Y i._._.....�.........._........ ... �` KENIL.., OR i AVEL---._..................._._........ .........._......._...... ..._...........I...... I AREA OF CONCERN 2.1 SOUTH OF WARNER AVENUE & EAST OF LESLIE LANE @ffDl ° o O p Figure 2-2 huntingt®n beach planning department 5 the Warner Avenue trunk line for transmission to the Orange County Sanitation District' s treatment facilities. Over the past several years, substantial new residential construction in Huntington Harbour and overloading from the Sunset Beach Sanitary District has resulted in the Warner Avenue trunk sewer flowing at and above the system' s design capacity. (This condition is known as surcharging. ) At one point, the flow was measured at 98 percent of pipe capacity. The City' s Master Plan of Sewers alleviates the problem through construction of the proposed coast trunk sewer. However, because of the size and cost of the coast trunk sewer project, construction is expected to be phased over an estimated eight-year period. More immediate relief of the overload situation was necessary and in June 1976 , the City Council directed staff to design and construct a parallel trunk sewer along Warner Avenue to alleviate the sewer deficiency and avoid a possible building moratorium in this area of the City. The new Warner Avenue trunk sewer, when completed/ will run along Warner Avenue from Springdale Street to Bolsa Chica Street, along Bolsa Chica Street from Warner Avenue to Los Patos Avenue, and westerly along Los Patos Avenue to Marina View Place. To date, only a portion of the project has been completed, being that segment between Springdale Street and approxi- mately 1000 feet west of Graham Street. The City is presently negotiating with the Orange County Sanitation District to resolve financing and timing for the remainder of the project. The completed portion of the new trunk line has alleviated the surcharge situation for the present time, but continued development in the Huntington Harbour area will cause the situation to again become critical in the near future. All proposed development projects within the service area of the Warner Avenue trunk sewer should be reviewed on an individual basis with regard to the amount of sewage added to the system to ensure that the sewer does not become overloaded, creating inconveniences and posing health hazards to local residents . Another issue affecting land use and development of the area of concern is the existence of an archaeological site on just over half of the property. The archaeological site was identified in the Scientific Resources Survey and Inventory conducted for the City of Huntington Beach in January 1973 by Archaeological Research Inc. An archaeological test report was prepared for the site upon 6. 4 filing Tentative Tract 9753. The report revealed that the site contains prehistoric shells and shell fragmenJand as well as bone and stone artifacts. Test results indicate the deposit to be a significant scientific resource, and a number of mitigation measures were recommended prior to the site' s destruction, grading, development. These mitigation measures included two basic alternative actions; either preserve the undisturbed archaeological deposit by acquisition and/or project design, or conduct salvage excavations to gain an adequate scientific sample of the site, including column samples and dateable Carbon-14 materials. These mitigation measures were incorporated into the conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 9753, which was approved by the Planning Commission on August 16 , 1977. These conditions will apply to any development proposal in the area of concern. In May 1978 , the property in question changed ownership once more. The new owner is requesting the City staff to analyze the site' s potential for office-professional development. The owner also requested an extension of time for the already approved tentative tract map and conditional use permit, thereby preserving the option of residential development, should the City Council deny his amendment request. The following section will analyze the request for redesignation of the area of concern to commercial. 2 . 1. 2 Analysis The property owner is requesting that the 2 .00-acre area of concern be redesignated commercial on the General Plan Land Use Element. Although the owner envisions office development on the site, a commercial designation would allow either commercial or office/professional uses . For this reason, both types of uses should be analyzed . Using the size and locational criteria for commercial uses found in the General Plan, it can be seen that regional, community, and specialty commercial uses would not be appropriate for the area of concern. Neighborhood or convenience commercial uses might feasibly be developed on the site, however. To determine the feasibility of these types of commercial uses for the site, a basic supply vs. demand analysis can be employed. Neighborhood commercial centers generally serve a one-mile radius service area; convenience centers a one-half mile radius area. There are five neighborhood centers located within one mile of the intersection of Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. These centers along with several smaller 7 4 developments, contain over 500, 000 square feet . of commercial and office uses. The same area supports a population of approximately 21,250 persons which generally could be expected to support about 200,000 square feet of neig hbor- hood commercial uses. The existing supply of 500,000 square feet in the Warner Bolsa Chica service area indicates that additional neighborhood commerical develop- ment is not warranted. The area of concern' s location 1000 feet east of Bolsa Chica Street is a further deterrent to use of the site for neighborhood retail activity. Although the area of concern could feasibly support con- venience uses such as a liquor store or delicatessen, the intersection of Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street currently supports such uses in adequate supply. While the factors that determine where commercial uses can most successfully locate are based primarily on the supply and demand characteristics for a given geographical market area, a slightly different approach must be taken to assess the feasibility of office/professional development. Commercial uses, as a rule, tend to locate centrally to serve a surrounding market area, with competition between shopping centers to attract customers and business. Of- fices, on the other hand, tend to cluster around major facilities such as hospitals or in locations offering many amenities. Although supply and demand still play a part in determining how much office space can be developed, the locational criteria are not as crucial. The following analys' utilizes a technique used by Economic Research Associates in their 1971 report on Office Development Potentials in the Top-of-Pier Plan Area for Huntington Beach. Office space can be divided into two categories - general and medical. Potential for general office space is based on employment trends while medical office potential .follows the general public' s requirements for physicians and dentists . ERA's 1971 projections for office space in Huntington Beach show a total of 650 , 000 supportable square feet of general office space for the year 1980 and 118 , 000 square feet of medical office space for a cumulative total of 768 ,000 square feet. A recent survey of existing office space in Huntington Beach indicates that there is an approximate total of 550, 000 square feet of office space developed at this time. This total does not include offices which have located in neighborhood and community commercial shopping centers, a trend which has characterized Huntington Beach over the past several years and raises the actual existing total. 8 From this simple analysis it would appear that additional office/professional development can be supported. As a check, a sample of twenty-one office buildings in Huntington Beach was contacted to determine the viability of already existing office facilities. The results of the survey revealed that there is a 90 percent occupancy ` rate for office suites in the City. This low vacancy {. factor is a good indication that there is a fairly strong office market in Huntington Beach. Office buildings in the vicinity of the area of concern had an even higher occupancy rate of 93. 5 percent. Redesignation of the area of concern to commercial would allow for the expansion of an already viable office/professional cluster rather than piecemeal development of a problem piece of resi- dential property abutting a major arterial. The proposed commercial designation is compatible with the surrounding office/professional and residential uses and is less affected by traffic and aircraft noise impacts associated with Warner Avenue and Meadowlark Airport. An office/professional development on the site would also create less of an impact on local schools and open space facilities than a residential use in a quarter section identified as deficient in open space. More traffic would' be generated by office/professional development than by single family homes but Warner Avenue is a major arterial and should accommodate the added traffic with no difficulty. The impact on the sewer system is difficult to assess with- out knowing the mix of offices that will be developed under the commercial land use designation. While general office uses such as real estate or financial would create less sewage than single family homes, medical offices -send to use more water and produce more sewage. Completion of the proposed Warner Avenue trunk sewer will provide the necessary capacity to accommodate either residential or office/professional uses in the area of concern. 2 . 1. 3 Recommendation The staff recommends that Area of Concern 2 . 1 be redesig- nated from Low Density Residential to Commercial. 2. 1. 4 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission approves the redesignation of Area of Concern 2. 1 from Low Density Residential to Commercial. 9 e i F2. 2 South of Warner Avenue and East of Bolsa Chica Street Background The area of concern encompasses 16. 48 acres, located be- tween Warner and Los Patos Avenues, and extending from Bolsa Chica Street to Leslie Lane (Figure .2- 3) . The study area is currently designated low density resi- dential. The area of concern is being considered for redesignation to medium density residential. The property includes approximately sixteen single family homes, a mushroom nursery, and vacant land. Existing land uses to the north consist of retail commercial and office professional. Also, to the north across Warner Avenue, is Meadowlark Airport. To the east of the area of concern is a medium density residential tract of four-plexes that were recently constructed. The property to the south is currently designated high density residential (R3) and is partially developed with apartments . Use Permit No. 75-65 has been approved for development of the remainder of the vacant R3 property. To the west immediately across Bolsa Chica Street are high density residential apartments (R3) and retail commercial uses. In response to requests from some of the property owners within the area of concern, the redesignation of this area was considered in General Plan Amendments 76-2 and 76-3, at which time the Planning Commission continued the matter requesting that a detailed study of residential uses in the area be undertaken before amending the land use designation. The issues that were cited as concerns included the com- patibility of the request with surrounding land uses and the availability of facilities such as open space and schools that would support an increase in. residential density. This area of concern was also included in General Plan Amendment 77-1 (Adopted August, 1977) . The request for f redesignation was also for medium density residential. However, because of the lack of supporting facilities such as a park site, school and sewers as well as the sight and sound disturbances from Meadowlark Airport, the area of concern was retained as low density residential. In March, 1978, a request for a change of zone (Zone Change No. 78-5) was considered for the parcel at the northwest corner of Leslie Lane and Dunbar Street (approximately 0.5 gross acres) . The request was to 10 c I Q y . YYY ` .... .................. YE t.. ........... :.. ..._......} ./ _ MEDIUM DENSITY ............_.. _ ._.... J P�l O LOW II�.._... DENSITY t 1 j COMMERCIAL I _ .. r .._� _..... RNER�_... _ _ I . W I � i_ X. _ .... .::::.............::::::::::::::::::::.: ::.;::::._.::.::j:.;:.;:;:::>:>:;:::.;::.:................................... {MEDIUM _... ;:.;> >: LOW ..................... .. _....... ......::..... DENSITY .........................::>::;.; 7% ....................................:: .......... ............ ............ .. ............ I LU ...........: f �...... .vr';Y •:a:::. � LOW.._....__ E LOW v�4 f.... DENSITY DENSITY_.f..._.... HIGH DENSITY .__..._....... ......... ..... ......_.............._._..... _..... rr ! s :AREA OF CONCERN 2.2 SOUTH OF WARNER AVENUE & EAST OF BOLSA CHICA STREET D[ T 0 Figure 2-3 huntingt®n beach planning department 11 change the zone from Rl, low density residential, to R2 medium density residential. Staff recommended denial of the request based on the previous General Plan Amendment actions. The Planning Commission, however, approved the request and directed staff to review the property north of Dunbar Drive for medium density residential as part of the next General Plan Amendment. The City Council subsequently approved the zone change on April 3, 1978 . On August 30, 1978, the Planning Department received a petition from all of the property owners adjacent to the south side of Dunbar Street; requesting that the zoning be changed from Rl to R2 (see Appendix B) . 2. 2 . 2 Analysis The commercial and office professional designations to the north provide a logical separation of the study area from Warner Avenue, a major arterial highway. The medium density residential to the east and the high density to the south would be compatible with a medium density land use designation on the properties within the study area. This location would also be consistent with General Plan locational criteria calling for medium density residential to be located "in close proximity to commercial and other business areas, educational and institutional facilities, cultural, and other public facilities (e.g. transportation routes) . " Redesignation of the area medium density would also further the General Plan Policy of providing a variety of housing types in all areas of the City. A maximum of 247 dwelling units would be allowed. A question is raised, however, with regard to the com- patibility of residential development within the study area with the operation of Meadowlark Airport. Concern has been voiced by the Airport Land Use Commission con- cerning probable sight and sound disturbances to future inhabitants within the study area. Aircraft presently avoid flying directly over the study area. However, ad- ditional residential development on the property would still be affected by aircraft noise from planes taking off and would be exposed to the hazard of planes failing while attempting to take off. The City Council at its January 17, 1977 meeting deleted the condition for placement of a blast fence at the north end of the Meadowlark runway. This action by the City Council will allow the planes an lddfflak WE 12 i I k.1 additional 150-200 feet of runway for take-off. This will allow the planes to be at a higher altitude when flying in the vicinity of the subject property, thus reducing the sight and sound disturbances (see Figures 2-4 and 2-5) . f A water and sewer assessment district has been formed for i those properties within the area of concern fronting on Dunbar Street, a private street - that extends through I.I the study area. A six inch (6") water line and eight inch (8" ) sewer line have been constructed that will be able to accommodate low or medium density residential development. The lots that front on Bolsa Chica Street will take water and sewer access directly from existing lines extending down Bolsa Chica Street. As has been discussed in the analysis of Area of Concern 2 . 1, the City is presently constructing a new trunk sewer to serve the general area. A portion of the Warner Avenue trunk sewer has been completed to approximately 1000 feet west of Graham Street which has eliminated the surcharge con- dition that previously existed. Upon completion of the remainder of the trunk sewer, capacity will exist for the development allowed by a medium density residential designation. Storm drainage will be accommodated by street flow down Dunbar Street to Bolsa Chica Street which has storm drain facilities. i Another consideration when analyzing this property for residential development is the availability of supporting facilities (open space and schools) . If the entire 16 . 48 acres are designated medium density, a maximum population of 600 persons could be generated. The Open Space and Conservation Element identifies the area bounced by Slater Avenue, Graham Street, Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica ' Street as being deficient in neighborhood park land by 1. 6 acres. The requested change from low density to medium density residential will intensify this park deficiency to 2 . 3 acres. If the land use is changed to medium density residential, effort should be directed toward securing a neighborhood park site. i The seven-acre parcel of land lying immediately behind the parcels on the south side of Dunbar Street and north of the proposed R3 high density development (UP 75-65) was once a land fill dump site. In order for development to occur on this seven acre parcel, extensive excavation of the parcel would have to be carried out. The parcel may be in a good location for development of a neighborhood park. The area of concern as well as the surrounding properties have need for a park site and recreational facilities. AMN 13 PROPOSED 1 0 C r --LLLL -L CF—E. OAHU MEADOWLARK (MEA.Dow DR. DR H 4— VENTURI DRX-ee M.M.-- . ... .. . %... .. .. ... .. . .......... 800 Fr C 0 400 % f. X % ee ee MARSKALL DR :-N Me X. . ....... . % X.: Ile I.. Xe- tt�- 11 eee!*� ... X h5i::e OFF v -17 ..... ....... X: X X ----- --- -- --- ------- .....• . ........... .. .• ..... .. ... • AYE VEIL v X. X, —0O E OR V X 'X ST X. Sta .......... V 5 e.: WAEN;W LANK .%.RPQRr) MIlOST� f04o ... . . .. Airport D* VIEW t ICI- V V .... .......... V ... ------- %a-so.; V: V ...... ... .. ......... .............. v .. ........ .............. -k V e?e' .......... X.: Ej X z:.- R v I ..:� R' .q. ... ........0 W.M.0,; .......... X. . . ............. A:� W. . .Vl AVE x. LEGEND Residential11• Commercial IL--T F�7 UFG DR — t Church H V Vacant CF—I.LaE V July 1977 Figure 2-4 *1 Ll� Meadowlark Airport And Existing Land Uses H go a huntington beach planning department 14 I Heii Ave . En ro Meadowlark Golf Course U . ro 0 Me lark Air ort Ave . E,o/0' warner 0 1000 2000 3000 + SCALE IN FEET -Figure 2-5 - CNEL 60 . - 65 ® - CNEL 65 - 70 1974 ® - CNEL 70+ i MEADOW LARK AIRPORT CNEL 60, 65, AND 70 NOISE CONTOURS i 15 c . The Ocean View School District has indicated that as the area south of Warner Avenue develops and the school age population in the area expands, the school district would construct an elementary school on an existing school site located within the area owned by Signal Landmark Properties, Inc. The City may wish to explore the possibility of an adjoining neighborhood park site to provide the needed recreational facilities for the area t of concern and the surrounding properties. Should the area of concern be redesignated to medium density resi- dential, a maximum of 79 elementary school students, 17 high school students and 42 junior college students would be generated. This is fewer elementary and high school students than would be generated by the maximum development allowed by the existing low density residential designation (84 elementary, and 26 high school students) . As previously mentioned, Area of Concern 2 . 2 also contains an old landfill occupying about six acres . The area was once used as a dump site for oil related waste materials. The wastes are solidified but extensive analysis of the soils problems and the extent of soil replacement would be required. It is, however, certain that a significant amount of excavation and fill would be necessary. During such an operation strong odors may enter the atmosphere. The odors would have resulted from chemical reaction of the waste material buried at the dump site. Final Tract 9235, which lies in close approximation to the -dump site, experienced the escape of strong odors into the atmosphere during construction . that disturbed persons living in adjacent dwelling units. Soil samples should be taken E� prior to development to determine the extent of the land fill and the potential of escape of strong odors into the atmosphere. Active earthquake faults within the City of Huntington Beach, known specifically as the North Branch, Bolsa- Fairview and South Branch Faults , are all contained L within the Newport-Inglewood Structural Zone. This fault zone enters the City in the Huntington Harbour area and extends in a south-easterly direction. Under the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Zones Act, Special Study Zones have been established within Huntington Beach. The General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach, December 1976 , details these special Study Zones on page 29 and sets forth guiding criteria. The southwestern portion of Area of Concern 2 . 2 is located within this special study zone (see Figure 2-6) . In addition, the City' s AM& 16 uuunw nunumuninunu •��. � �� numnunouuuw unnnnunununu �� �� uunuuuunuunu.unnnuuunnuuu ,� , '=�"„� �� uuuuunuuunu:•„uuuuuuuuuunn .,.� nnnnunuuuunn.:nuuuunuunuu�. ,,,",,,= ,"„ ",■.� OWN nununuunuuun^uunuuuuunnun BBBBBa\ �� SI Ste^ �� �, RRR��tltlt BRRRRtlO.. 88��pgpp�q{�gp� �•.'� �� ' iR tltl% C n 1tliQRi%w' R ON`•E •;eea�aea� . a am mom +se��eea 22 INNER ZENRm game, go 7 1 ' D i U Department of Building and Community Development requires either an engineering geologist' s analysis of construction sites or that buildings for human occupancy be designed to resist a seismic force equal to . 186 gravity. These requirements are imposed for all discretionary acts. Loss of life .and structural damage is thereby reduced. A portion of Area of Concern 2 . 2, approximately the old dump site, has been identified by Archaeological Research, Incorporated as an archeologically significant site. This is a small portion of the "Cogged Stone" site that extends down into the Bolsa Chica area. It has been identified as probably the most unique and important archeological site remaining in the area. Over 200 cogged stones have been found to date on the entire site. i Two important questions may be answered by this site. It has been proposed that the cogged stone is a time marker (i.e. , a distinct artifact type found only at a specific point in time) . Definition of the absolute dates represented would be an important contribution. A second consideration would be determination of the function of this artifact, if this was accomplished. The apparent random appearance of the artifact type in other sites may provide information concerning cultural relationships and interaction for the time period. In order to answer either one or both of these questions, a reasonable number of these artifacts must be found in context (i.e. , in the ground) and their association with many other types of archeological materials must be determined. To date all of the cogged stones found at Ora-83 have been out of context and these are incapable y of providing the type of information required. Development of this area appears to adversely affect this site. A qualified archeologist should sufficiently clear constriction areas of archaeological data prior to any grading for development. An archaeologist should also be present 1 during all phases of grubbing and grading. If significant data are discovered during grading, the machinery should be diverted until adequate salvage is performed. 2. 2. 3 Recommendation The staff recommends that Area of Concern 2 . 2 not be redesignated Medium Density Residential, but that the Low Density Residential designation be retained. 2 . 2. 4 Planning Commision Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends continuance of this area of concern to General Plan Amendment 79-1. 18 i t, 2. 3 Atlanta Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard 2. 3. 1 Background This is a staff-initiated request to amend the designation of Atlanta Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard on the City' s Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways. This one-half mile segment of Atlanta Avenue is currently designated as a major arterial on the Circulation Plan (Figure 2-7) as a result of Precise Plan of Street Alignment 70-4, which the City Council adopted in December, 1970. This alignment was adopted with the concept of splitting Atlanta Avenue to intersect with Olive Avenue and Orange Avenue, creating a one way couplet consistent with the City' s Top-of-Pier Plan. This precise plan called for a 120-foot wide major arterial to carry large traffic vol- umes from Beach Boulevard to the redeveloped downtown area. In December, 1975, the Orange/Olive couplet was deleted from the Circulation Element with the adoption of General Plan Amendment 76-1A and a new land use plan for the downtown 6 area. In July, 1977' local property owners wishing to dev- �. elop property affected by the right-of-way requirements of Precise Plan 70-4 asked the City to resolve the apparent conflict of intent with regard to Atlanta Avenue. In September, 1977, the Planning Commission approved . revocation of the old precise plan and directed staff to analyze a num- ber of new alignments in order to adopt a new precise plan. The preferred alternative alignment now being considered shows Atlanta Avenue connecting with Lake Street rather than Orange Avenue, and calls for a 100-foot right-of-way as op- posed to 120 feet under Precise Plan 70-4 (Figure 2-8) . The �. ! Circulation Element should be amended to show Atlanta Avenue, i as a primary arterial between Lake Street and Beach Boule- ,f vard in order to allow staff to proceed with the preparation'; 1 of a new precise plan for Atlanta Avenue. 2. 3. 2 Recommendation The staff recommends that the segment of Atlanta Avenue �� be- tween Lake Street and Beach Boulevard be redesignated from a major arterial to a primary arterial with a 100-foot right-of-way. 2. 3. 3 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission approves the redesignation of Atlanta Avenue from a major arterial to a primary arterial . between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard. 19 AMENDMENTS PLAN" CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL trtr STREETS AND HIGHWAYS ADOPTED BY CITY L RESOLUTION NO 4366-DECK.6,1976 LEGEND: FREEWAY STREET CAPACITY �. MAJOR_ 45PW PRIMARY 30.000 SECONDARY_ —20DW NOTE: SOLID LIES NAMATE E%ISTM RWNT OF WAY NOT fECESSARLY ULTMATE RIGHT OF WAY "IED LINES 110 A AREAS WHERE NO ig R04T OF WAY EXtM �O �C% 40 r.>r i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH y: - ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA a+o Figure 2- 7 20 r I / '�\\\��•�:�� �) � � I III y P• ICI o;l>, i I E�1 / aE llS I Ira I k PROPOSE® ATLANTA/ LAKE ALIGNMENT Q Figure 2-8 O • huntingt®n beach planning department' 21 3. 0 AMENDMENT SUMMARY 3. 1 Area by Area Summary 3. 1. 1 South of Warner Avenue and East of Leslie Lane �• PROPOSED LAND USE ACREAGE SUMMARY Category Gross Acres General Commercial 2. 0 3. 1. 2 South of Warner Avenue and East of Bolsa Chica Street Area continued to General Plan Amendment 79-1. 3. 1. 3 .Atlanta Avenue from Beach Boulevard to Lake Street No additional arterials added. Designations only changed. 23 i I t 3.2 Summary of Proposed General Plan Amendment 78-2 PROPOSED LAND USE ACREAGE SUMMARY Existing Proposed. Net Land Use Category Gross Acres Gross Acres Gross Acres Residential Low Density 2.00 0 - 2. 00 Commercial General 0 2.00 + 2. 00 Total land area involved in the amendment: 2. 00 gross acres. CITYWIDE NET PROJECTED POPULATION CHANGE Residential Net Gross Max.. Units/ Total Population Estimated Type Acres Gross Acre Units Per Unit Population, Low Density. 2. 00 x 7.0 = 14 x 3. 25 - 46 Jr SO y� d. t:ya a .i'�62C't�+ 4ti`:YG vi. M..n.•'Cx:!:II.'i,.:'.'y.:wxS'.Yi� '7.?:Fi?'.B/iMYl7.'&1rNtlirr:+MG:"" w L� t i P 4%� LEGEND q�oJriifJj e� `�iy o .,1♦���'�i�� ' i.i 1110 ® Commercial 6 i ♦ ,O @0(�9�y � `P�Pti @`�S ♦�`• '�� PAS ¢q ■ �p ..qQo .,� i. PO ■ 4y ♦� ��� qG FP �i �yy s I _■ c ■ S PALM / _■ / j ORANGE Redesignate as a primary arterial �. on the Circulation Plan of iN PACIFIC C-1 Nwr Arterial Streets and Highways ® Figure 3-1 HUWINGTON B69CH, 01LIFORNIA 1 � PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 i k� •i APPENDICES APPENDIX A ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Fee - $75.00 FOR CITY USE ONLY s - Date Received: /Authorize3 Agent ProjectI 523 N. Grand Avenue Number: if Santa Ana, CA. 92701 Department of Origin Mailing Address 714 834-9553 Ox V\ V\9 O er App icati n Telephone or Permit Numbers: Russell M. Jedinak, President 7 9 - Z R.M.J. Corporation Property Owner 16551 Brookhurst Street Fountain Valley, CA. 92708 Mailing A ress Te ep one 714 839-6133 NOTE: To assist the Department of Planning •and Environmental Resources in making A determination as to whether a significant envirdn- mental effect may result from the proposed project, the following information must be supplied. Maps referred to below may be viewed at the City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning and Environmental Resources. 1.0 Project Information (Please attach Plot Plan and submit photo- graphs of subject property) Attached Site Plot Map & Photographs 1. 1 Nature of Project: Give complete description of the proposed project... Attached . a . If the Project is commercial or industrial give a complete description of activities and other pertinent information including but not limited to whether it is neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales areas (if any) , estimated employment per shift .. any ,potentially hazardous materials which maybe used, e .c. N.A. -l_ 25 . b. If the project is residential, indicate number, types \ and size of units and associated facilities. N.A. C. If the project is institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift and .community benefits to be derived from the .project. N.A. d. List all types of building materials to be used for all structures in the project. (Submit detailed elevations if available) Detailed plans will be submitted to the City after approval of subject zone change is granted. 1.2 Location of project: (Address, nearest street intersections) The site is located the southeast corner of Watner Avenue and Leslie Lane. 1. 3 Legal Description (Lot, Block, Tract) A.P. 163-121-01 , 02 , & 03 ; 163-122-01 , 02, & 03. A portion of the north half of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter section . 28 , Township 5 South, Range 11 west, San Bermardino Base Meridian. Precise legal descriptic attached. 1. 4 Project land area (acres) 2± acresNumber of parking spaces 30-40 1. 5 Square feet of building area 1600± Plumber of floors one and two 1.6 What is the percent and coverage proposed by the project for : a. Building 20±% - b. Paving 40± C. Existing landscaping None d. ilew landscaping 40± These percentages are subject to further study if this application is approved. -2- 26 1. 0 Project Information This application is intended for conversion of current permitted residential landuse (R1PD) to commercial landuse (R5) such that two office buildings can be constructed on the subject site in accordance with the City Building Code applicable to office commercial use . 1 . 1 Nature of Project Upon approval of commercial R5 zoning , the applicant envisions at this time , subject to detailed study , to construct 3000 square feet of office space structure in the northwest portion and 8000 square feet office space structure in the easterly portion of the site. One structure might be single story and the other two story with subter- ranian parking. Entrance to the project is contemplated from Leslie Lane with right turn only access from Warner Avenue . Appropriate landspaced open space is anticipated in the project . l. la Professional oriented office space is anticipated. Normal employment could be as much as 80 people from local residential areas surrounding the project site. 1. 3 Legal Description Parcel 1 : Beginning at a point on the northerly line of the Nk of the NW.k of the NW,- of Section 28 , Township 5 South, Range 11 West , San Bermardino Base and Meridian , distant 970 feet easterly of the NW corner thereof; and thence southerly parallel with the westerly line of said Nk 196 feet ; thence easterly parallel with said northerly line 222 feet ; thence northerly parallel with said westerly line 196 feet ; thence westerly along said northerly line 222 feet to she point of beginning. Parcel 2 : Beginning at a point on the northerly line of the.-Nk of the NW4 of the NW4 of said Section 28 , distant thereon 1192 feet easterly of the northwesterly corner thereof; thence southerly parallel with the westerly line thereof 320 feet ; thence easterly parallel with the northerly line thereof to a point on the easterly line of said Nk of the NW4 of the NW4 of Section 28 distant thereon 320 feet southerly from the northwesterly corner thereof; thence northerly along said easterly line 320 feet to said northeasterly corner ; thence westerly along the northerly line thereof to the point of beginning. 27 (Information available in Planni.ny Department un Di :r:�ut Maps) 1 i Present Vacant R1PD Low Density , Proposed Office R5 Residential I Professional Surrounding Low Density north Vacant R1 Residential j Surrounding Residential R2 Medium Density south Residential urrounding Residential R1 Low Density east Residential i Surrounding Office west Professional R5 Office 1. 8 What will be the maximum occupancy of all structures proposed within the project? Maximum occupancy will be determined during design of the Project 1. 9 List other public agencies having jurisdiction by law in approval , authorization, certification or issuance of a permit project: O.C . Flood Control DistICL Ej State DIvi on of O.C. Air Pollution Control U City Council District Planning Commisson Q California Coastal lone �---r Conservation Commission �O' Board of Zoning El California Regional Water t--lDesign Review Board Quality Control Board Other: _ E Loc-i l Agency Formation Commission 28 . -3- 1r:10 If the project is commercial, industrial, or residential what is the roadway distance in miles from the project to the nearest: a. Shopping Center 4 miles to Huntington Center b. Freeway exit 4.4 miles to San Diego Freeway C. Elementary School (refer to Recreation Areas Map) 1 . 6 miles d. Public park (refer to Recreation Areas clap) 1. 2 miles e. Scenic Highway (.refer to Recreation Paths, Corridors, and Areas Map) 1. 5 miles 2. 0 Existing Environmental Setting of Proposed Project: 2.1 Seismic: I • a. What is the distance from the project to the nearest fault line (refer to Fault Map) ? 2000 feet to Bolsa Fairview Fault b. Is the project site within . a designated earthquake hazard area (refer to Earthquake Hazard Special Study Zone Map) ? No 2. 2 Drainage and Flood Control: a. Please describe specifically the volume of drainage and how it will be accommodated: Upon completion of project about 3 C.F.S. of surface flow will be generated. Major' portion of this flow will be directed to Leslie Lane. b. Is the project within a flood hazard area?C.P. ZO'7& natural flood plain? Yes (refer to Flood Plains and Flood Hazard Area Maps) C. What is the distance from the project to the nearest flood channel? (refer to Flood Control Channels Map) 20001 ft . to south Distersbury Chanel d. What is the distance from the project to the nearest shoreline? 1. 3 miles . 2. 3 Topography: i a. Does the project site exhibit excessive slope? (refer to Topography:Slope Map) No i b, What is the distance from the project to the nearest bluff? (refer to Principal Vistas and Features Map) The sight is at the bluff line. C. what is the range and slope of the propertj as it now exists? East west slope 3±%, southeasterly portion at 7+7. -4- 29 2 . 4 Land Form: a. Is the property presently graded? Yes b. Indicate the gross cubic yards of grading proposed the acres of land to be graded , the amount of earth to be transported on the site , and the amount of earth to be transported o t e s to No grading is proposed under this application C. What will be the maximum height and grade of cut or fill after grading is completed? N.A. d. Is the surrounding area graded? Yes . If so, how will it affect subject property? Will not be affected. 2 . 5 Soils: a. Type of soil on the project site? Sand, clay-sand, sandy clay and silty sand. b. Are there any Peat and/or Organic Soils on the site? No (refer to Peat and Organic Soils Map) c. Does the site exhibit- moderate to high expansive soils? No (refer to Expansive Soil Distribution Map) 2. 6 Geologic: a. Is the site within a high risk geologic problem area? No (refer to Geotechnical Land Use Capability Map) b. Is the site within an area which has experienced a variable and complex pattern of land subsidence? No (refer to Land Subsidence Map) _ 2. 7 Historic/Archaeological: a. Could there possibly be any objects of historic, aesthetic or archaeological significance on the site? If so, please describe. (refer to Archaeolo ig cal Sites Historic Landmark Sites and Principal_ Vistas an Features Nlap) Archaelogical Test Report is attached. -5- 30 2. 8 Wildlife/Vegetation: a. Does any wildlife use the site for a place to feed, nest or rest? If so, please list: No b. Will any of this wildlife be displaced by the proposed project? If so, how? C. Indicate the extent, size and species of plant life per- sently existing on the site. None - the site is graded for weed control d. Indicate the location and area (in acres or square feet) and type of plant life to be removed as a result of the project. Include number type and size of trees to be re- moved. All plant material is removed 2. 9 Water Quality: a. Does any portion of the project abut or encroach on beaches , estuaries, bays, tidelands , or inland water areas? No b. Describe how the project will effect any body of water. None 2. 10 Air Quality: a. If the project is industrial, describe and .list air pol- lution sources and quantity and types of pollutants emitted as a result of the project. N.A. b. List any Air Poiiut-i-on Contro� Distric equipment regai r,:d. Construction is not a part. of this app ication . -6- 31 • 2.11 Noise: a. Describe any adjacent off-site noise sources (i.e. , airports , industry, freeways) . Meadow Lark Airport is 0. 3± miles east of the site b. What noise will be produced by the project? If available, please give noise levels in decibel measurement and typical time distribution when noise will be produced. Noise from the project will not be significant as compared to existing noise levels . c. How will noise produced by the project compare with existing noise levels? Project noise will be less than existing noise levels 2.12 Traffic: a. Indicate the present traffic volume on arterials and added trips per day from the project. 17000 A.D.T. plus 200 A.D. T. b. What is the existing speed limit at the project location? 45 M.P.H. on Warner C. Indicate points of egress and ingress to the project. Two way acdess on Leslie Land and right turn only on Warner Avi 3. 0 Public Services and Facilities: 3. 1 Water: a. Will the project -require installation or replacement of new water mains? No b. Attach a map showing the service area, size and lo- cation of new lines . N.A. C. Please estimate the daily volume in gallons required to serve the project. N.A. -— 32 3. 2. Sewer: a. Will -the project require installation or replacement of new sewer mains? No b. Attach a map showing the service area, size and location of new lines. c. Discuss the capacity required for the project and how this relates to existing effluent volumes within the system. 3. 3 Utility Lines: a. Indicate length and type of new offsite. transmission and distribution facilities required to serve project. N:A. b. Do any overhead electrical facilities require relocation? N.A. If so, please describe facilities. c. Do existing lines have to be increased in number or size for project? No If so, please describe how. 3. 4 Solid Waste: a. Describe the type and amount (pounds/day) of solid waste generated by the project. N.A. Type: Pounds/Day 3. 5 Education: a. For residential projects , note primary and secondary school districts: Primary: N.A. Secondary: -8- 33 '3. 6 Population Displacement: a. Will any residential occupants be displaced by the project activities? No If not, do not answer question (b) . b. What is the total number of residents to be displaced? 3. 7 Demolition: a. Will any improvements be demolished or removed by the project? No If so, answer questions . b through d. b. Describe briefly the type of buildings or improvements to be demolished by the project. None C. List approximate volume of exported material. Earthwork volume movement cannot be estimated at this time. d. Indicate the location and the distance to the site where exported material will be dumped. 4. 0 Mitigating Measures: 4. 1 Are there measures included in the project which may conserve resources (electricity, gas, water or wildlife) ? Please describe. These measures will be subject to detail planning and design after this zone change application is approved. 4 . 2 Are there measures proposed in the design of. the project to re- duce noise pollution to persons occupying project? Yes If so, please describe. Appropriate use of setbacks , landscaping , building insulating material , jucisious use of window openings facing Warner Avenue are proposed to be included in the design of this project. 4. 3 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to reduce noise pollution to persons outside of the project which is caused by noise generated by the project? If so, please describe. Significant noise levels from the project are not anticipated. -9- 34 C. 4 Are there measures in the design of the project (architectural treatment and landscaping) which have been coordinated with design of the existing community to minimize visual effect? If so, please describe. Study of existing architecture is proposed at design stage such that project architecture and site planning will be compatible with existing 'structures on the south and west side of the site. 4. 5 Are there measures or facilities designed into the project to facilitate resources recovery (e.g. solar heating/special insulation etc.) ? M Reduced use of resources through adequate use of inslutating material ;'in the buildings is anticipated. 5.0 Alternatives: Are there alternatives to the -project which may result in a lesser adverse environmental effect? Please explain all project alternatives. 1) No project. Present vacant use may be maintained with possible conversion of the property from park use. 2) A Residential project may be implemented at the site with controlled density to reduce impact of such use. 6. 0 Additional Information: (regarding questions above) . If necessary attach a itional sheets. I hereby certify that the information herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. g atote Date Filed -10- 35 APPENDIX A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: File PROJECT,APPLICATION, OR PERMIT NO: GPA 7 8-2 PROJECT 1TICE/DESCRfiM0N/LOCA770N: Request to redesignate 16 . 48 acres of property located south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica tr -t Low Density Residential to. Medium Density Residential JECT MU : City of Huntington Beach EXEMPTION IDENTIFICA17ON: (� Categorical Exemption Ongoing Project L_J Sec. Sec.15070 Ciao Emergency Exemption ❑ Activity not Defined as Project See.15071 (h) & (c). See.15037 (b) A'finideripl hvject Other(Expidn) See.15073 © 1"re project(pilvate)+s a lemer pare of anothe,project for which an EIR has previously been prepared;the original project and EIR were approved, and there were no aubetantial changes proposed in the project to involve new environmental tmpactt;not oonddeived in the original EIR. (See.15067) Original EIR Number: EIR 7 7—3 Date Approved: 8/1/7 7 Pursumnt to the:;ALIFORNLk EN1JdROiG'R1MAL QUALUT ACT OF 1970 and provibiom of the HUNTMGTO:V BEACH ORDMANCE CODE,which prodde that an activity is cxetnp:from environmental eval ration wnc(;:t is crn be dcterniucd tvid. certainty that :lee activity %rill not have a significant effect on the enviro.aac::t,the activity referencad hLrein!a there-Pore gwited ER:NAItP ON STATUS with the following statement of findin�p: Assistant Planner Sept. 5 , 1978 �and 71tle of Person Cerrdffying Request Date: 36 APPENDIX A E14VIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Fee - $75.00 FOR CITY USE ONLY Huntington Beach Planning Department Date Received• Applicant Authorized Agent Project Number: /V J) ') P. 0. Box 190 - Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Department of Origin Mailing Address Planning (714) 536-5271 Other Application Telephone or Permit Numbers : P.P. 77-3 N.A. Property Owner N.A. Mailing Add ress Telep one NOTE: To assist the Department of Planning and Environmental Resources in making a determination as to whether a significant environ- mental effect may result from the proposed project, the following information must be supplied. Maps referred to below may be viewed at the City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning and Environmental Resources. 1.0 Project Information (Please attach Plot Plan and submit photo- graphs of subject property) 1. 1, Nature of Project: Give complete description of the proposed project. Adoption of a Precise Plan of Street Alignment for Atlanta Avenue and Lake Street at th it int rs tion. Alternative 2 provides for a 100' right-of-way for Atlanta and Lake. Atlanta �tivt. intersect Lake at the present location. Lake would be realigned to provide a vx- gentle curvature. Alternative 5 provides for Atlanta Ave. to curve south into Pacific Coast Hi%y. , utilizing a portion of Lake St. Lake would terminate at Atlanta. Also calls for 100' right-of-way. a. Ir thle project is commercial or industrial give a complete description of activities and other pertinent information: including but not limited to whether it is neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales areas (if any) , estimated employment per shift, any potentially hazardous materials which may be used, etc. N.A. -1- 37 b. If the project is residential, indicate number, types .and size of units and associated facilities. N.A. C. If the project is institutional, indicate the major function, estimated. employment per, shift and community benefits to be derived from the project. N.A. d. List all types of building materials to be used for all structures in the project. (Submit .detailed elevations if available) N.A. 1.2 Location of project: (Address, nearest street intersections) Refer to District Map Intersection of Atlanta Ave. and Lake St. and Vicinity 1.3 Legal Description (Lot, .Block, Tract) Not available at this time 1. 4 Project land area (acres) 5.0 Number of parking spaces N.A. 1. 5 Square feet of building area N.A. Number of floors N.A. 1.6 What is the percent and coverage proposed by the project for: a. Building N.A. b. Paving 100% C. Existing landscaping N.A. d. New landscaping N.A. -2- 38 t. i Veneral relatic hips of the project to su. _)undi•ng properties: (Information avdilable in. Planning Department on District Maps) LAND USE ELEMENT USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN wstftyPresent Some Res. Units & R-3 Residentia Mobile Homes R-5 Mixed Use Commercial roposed 100' street C-3 Oldtown Specific Plan Surrounding Vacant, single & R2-PD Medium Density Resid. north Multi-Family Res. R-5 Oldtown Specific Plan Vacant, Mobile R-3 Mixed Use - Ccurnercial Surrounding Home Park, Some R-5 High Density Res. south oil extraction C-3 Vacant R2-PD Medium Density Resid. Surrounding east j Single Multi- C-3 Mixed Use-Commercial Surrounding Family Res. west Some oil extrac- tion I i 1. 8 What will be the maximum occupancy of all structures proposed within the project? N.A. f 1. 9 List other public agencies having jurisdiction by law in approval , authorization, certification or issuance of a permit for this project: ❑ O.C. Flood Control District ❑ State Division of Highways ❑ O.C. Sanitation District ❑ Corps of Engineers ❑ O.C. Air Pollution Control 0 City Council District ❑ Planning Commission ® California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission ❑ Board of Zoning Adjustments ❑ California Regional Water ❑ Design Review Board Quality Control Board ❑ Other: Q Local Agency Formation Commission • -3- 39 1.10 If the project is commercial, industrial, or residential what .= is the roadway distance in miles. from the project to the nearest: N.A. a. Shopping Center b. Freeway exit ' c. Elementary School (refer to Recreation Areas Map) d. Public park (refer to Recreation Areas Map) e. Scenic Highway (refer to Recreation Paths, Corridors, and Areas Map) 2. 0 Existing Environmental Setting of Proposed Project: 2.1 Seismic: a. What is the distance from the project to the nearest fault line (refer to Fault Map) ? 200-1200 ft. (south Branch Fault) b. Is the project site within a designated earthquake hazard area '(refer to Earthquake -Hazard Special Study Zone Map) ? No 2. 2 Drainage and Flood Control: a. Please describe specifically the volume .of drainage and how it will be accommodated: N.A. b. Is the project within a flood hazard area? Yes Or naturl.l flood plain? Yes (refer to Flood Plains annTFlood Hazard Area Maps) Extreme eastern portion of project area. c. What is the distance from the project to the nearest flood . channel? (refer to Flood Control Channels Map) 2000' (H.E. Channel) d. What is the distance from the project to the nearest shoreline? 1o0o_?0oo ft_ 2. 3 Topography: a. Does the project site exhibit excessive slope? (refer to Topography:Slope Map) Approx. 10% at one point. b. What is the distance from the project to the nearest bluff? (refer to Principal Vistas and Features Map) Project crosses bluff line c. What is the range and slope of the property as it now exists? 0 - 10% slope - generally toward the southeast - Majority of the site is relatively level. •40 -4- 2. 4 Land Form: a. Is the property presently graded? Partially b. Indicate the gross cubic yards of grading proposed Undetermined the acres of land to be graded _, the amount-of earth to be transported on the site , and the amount of earth to be transported off the site c. What will be the maximum height and grade of cut or fill after grading is completed? UndetenTaned d. Is the surrounding area graded? YeS If so, how will it affect subject property? Portions—o —existing mobile home park site will require fill. 2.5 Soils: a. Type of soil on the project site? Ramona sandy loam. b. Are there any Peat and/or Organic Soils on the site? No (refer to Peat and Organic Soils Map) c. Does the site exhibit moderate to high expansive soils? No. (refer to Expansive Soil Distribution Map) 2. 6 Geologic: a. Is the site within a high risk geologic problem area? No (refer to Geotechnical Land Use Capability Map) . b. Is the site within an area which has experienced a variable and complex pattern of land subsidence? No (refer to Land Subsidence Map) • 2. 7 Historic/Archaeological: a. Could there possibly be any objects of historic, aesthetic or archaeological significance on the site? If so, please describe. (refer to Archaeological Sites, Historic Landmark Sites and Principal Vistas and Features Map�— Bluff line (scenic vista) -5- ' 41 2. 8 Wildlife/Vegetation: a. Does any wildlife use the site for a place to feed, nest or rest? If sor, please list: Rodents, birds b. Will any of this wildlife be displaced by the proposed project? No If so, how? c. Indicate the extent, size and species of plant life per- sently existing on the site. Weeds, grass, shrubs d. Indicate the location and area (in acres or square feet) and type of plant life to be removed as a result of the project. Include number type and size of trees to be re- moved. None 2. 9' Water Quality: a. Does any portion of the project abut or encroach on beaches , estuaries, bays, tidelands, or inland water areas? None b. Describe how the project will effect any body of water. N.A. 2.10 Air Quality: a. If the project is industrial, describe and list air pol- lution sources and quantity and types of pollutants emitted as a result of the project. N.A. b. List any Air Pollution Control District equipment required. N.A. -6- 42 2.11 Noise: a. Describe any adjacent off-site noise sources (i.e. , airports , industry, freeways) No major sources b. What noise will be produced by the project? If available, please give noise levels in decibel measurement and typical time distribution when noise will be produced. 60 - 80 dB during construction C. How will noise produced by the project compare with existing noise levels? 0 - 20 dB increase during construction. Slight increase after completion due to increased vehicular traffic 2.12 Traffic: a. Indicate the present traffic volume on arterials and added trips per day from the project. 5400 ADT on Atlanta; 2900 on Lake south of Atlanta; 3900 north of Atla:._--:: Alt. 4 - May slightly increase traffic on Lake. Alt. 5 - May increase traffic on Atlanta and reduce traffic on Lake. b. What is the existing speed limit at the project location? 40 MPH on Atlanta 35 MPH on Lake C. Indicate points of egress and ingress to the project. N.A. 3. 0 Public Services and Facilities: 3.1 Water: a. Will the project require installation or replacement of new water mains? No b. Attach a map showing the service area, size and lo- cation of new lines. N.A. c. Please estimate the daily volume in gallons required to serve the project. N.A. -7- 43 3. 2 Sewer: �- a. Will the project require installation or replacement of new sewer mains? No b. Attach a map showing the service area, size and location of new lines. N.A. C. Discuss the capacity required for the project and how this relates to existing effluent volumes within the system. N.A. 3. 3 Utility Lines: a. Indicate length and type of new offsite transmission and distribution facilities required to serve project. Done b. Do any overhead electrical facilities require relocation? Yes If so, please describe facilities. Rows of telephone poles along Atlanta and Lake require relocation and undergrounding. C. Do existing lines have to be increased in number or size for project? No If so, please describe how. 3. 4 Solid Waste: a. Describe the •type and amount (pounds/day) of solid waste generated by the project. N.A. Type: Pounds/Day 3. 5 Education: a. For residential projects, note primary and secondary school districts: N.A. Primary: Secondary: -8- •44 i 3.6 , ' Population Displacement: a. Will any residential occupants be displaced by the project activities? Yes* If not, do not answer question (b) . -�- b. What is the total'number of residents to be displaced? Residents of 16 mobile hones (Alternatives 4 & 5� 2 single-family dwellings and approximately 2 apartment units (A ternative 4) 3.7 Demolition: a. Will any improvements be demolished or removed by the project? Yes* If so, answer questions b through d. b. Describe briefly the type of buildings or improvements to be j demolished by the project. oil well and tanks, residential units (see above) : I I C. List approximate volume of exported material. Undetermined. i I. d. Indicate the location and the distance to the site where �. exported material will be dumped. i Undetermined. 4.0 Mitigating Measures: 4. 1 Are there measures included in the project which may conserve resources (electricity, gas , water or wildlife) ? Please describe. No. 4. 3 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to re- duce noise pollution to persons occupying project? N.A. j If so, please describe.- I i 4. 4 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to reduce noise pollution to persons outside of the project which is caused by noise generated by the project? Yes If so, please describe. i Construction will proceed in accordance with City specifications regarding noise. Construction will be confined to daytime working hours. *If construction takes place in near future. -9- 45 4. 5 Are there measures in the design of the project (architectural treatment and landscaping) which have been coordinated with design of the existing community to minimize visual effect? No If so, please describe. 4. 8 Are there measures or facilities designed into the project to facilitate resources recovery (e.g. solar heating/special insulation etc.) ? No 5. 0 Alternatives: Are there alternatives to the project which may result in a lesser adverse environmental effect? Yes Please explain all project alternatives. 6.0 Additional Information: (regarding questions above) . If necessary Attach additional sheets. Adverse impacts can be mitigated by'delaying actual construction until after impacted land uses change (i.e., mobile home park) . I hereby certify that the information herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 00 K, 77 Signature Date Fildd -10- 46 2 Auguat 23, . 1978 APPENDIX B S' �1•lmltivs ton Beech Planxiiij,; Com—m.istAon 4 � i civic Bldg; liun`cini3ton Beach, Cal, 7 Dear Sire: � The unrloroi.;ncd orlxicrLi of property on the Scutii � ti i ciao of . Du.ilUcr St. 10055 of tho ownev o or all of ovrncre, horoby pet�ttion you to oban, e tho zonlDO from i 9 to R-2. They are 1ioted below startiLj from tho Eazt oleo 10 which is already R-2. 11 Ale:tander C. Crosixi : 1 , AP �`163-121 -42 Cror.lma.n Mvor'.i.-Ari- Co. l .n1��11%'__� 1.4 � Al -1c1-43 � Robert 1\argo1" ���C Fz•'/=:�_`�C�� %%fi 1 ! Nola J. Wallace - t8 19 CA) AP i,�1 'i -•�� Lt��- i 21 2.2 Thoma l Ja G o 1,'a r ci o o AP 2,5 24 i !, ' 163-1 :.1 -34 , tiu. .28 29 30 i 32 �l 47 . 1 APPENDIX B 2 Auguet 23, 1978 3 �H})ntinjr.ton Bceoh Planning Commiseten 4 Civic Center Bldg 5 Huntington Beach, Cal. 6 7 Dear. Sirs; The undersigned owners of Droperty on the South 8 side of Dunbar St. ,being 10096 of the owners or all o:' the owners, hereby petition you to obange the zoning from t-1 9 to R-2. They are listed below startirg from the r^.ast side 10 which is . already R-2. 11 Alexander C. Crosmar: 12 AF #163-121-42 13 Cro:jman A01ver'.i::ing Co. 14 AP 163-121-43 I 15 Robert Larger 16 Clara Kar•ger AP rr; 63-121-38 39 I 17 7 Nola J. Wallace 18 4L AP W163-4 �1-36 a 3? 19 Frank icy nea zo AP �163-121-35 21 // I Th owa b i a r d o f' 22 - Eva G. i-.ardos 23 AP �163- 1 ,� 1-32 & .33 i i 24 Ri c iurc, Rule 25 26 i 27 I .�,8 f it:.� PLANN,!rG DEFT. 29 1978 AU G 30 31 P. U. Gox 1 :U Huntington Beach,CA 9264U 32 i I I 48 , RESOLUTION NO. 4696 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMEND- MENT -NO. 78-2 AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires to update and refine the Land Use Element of the General Plan and amend the Circulation Element in keeping with changing community needs and objectives ; and General Plan Amendment No. 78-2 and Negative Declaration Nos . 78-51 and 77-122 thereto are necessary to meet the community needs; and Public hearing on adoption of said amendment and environ- mental documents duly conducted before the Planning Commission and approved by a majority of the voting members of the Com- mission. Thereafter, the City Council , after giving notice as prescribed by Government Code Section 65355, held at least one public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 78-2 and Negative Declaration Nos . 78-51 and 77-122; and At said hearing before the City Council all persons desir- ing to be heard on said amendment and environmental documents were heard, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, pursuant to provisions of Title 7 , Chapter 3, Article 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 65357 , that General Plan Amendment No. 78-2 , consisting of Area of Concern No. 2. 1 south of Warner Avenue , east of Leslie Lane is changed from Low Density Residential to Commercial, and the Land Use Element of the General Plan is hereby amended accordingly; and Area of Concern No. 2 . 3 , Atlanta Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Lake Street is changed from Major Arterial to Primary Arterial, and the Circulation Element of the General Plan is hereby amended accordingly. JOC :ps 10/30/78 1. • iJ•i 1. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of November 1978. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk REVIEWED AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ty Administrator City Attorney INITIATED AND APPROVED: �tJ Planning Director 2. . Res. . 4696 S'rX E OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Counci l at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6 th day Of November 19-2JI _, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Pattinson. MacAllister. Bailey , Mandic. Siebert NOES: Councilmen: Shenkman ABSENT: Councilmen: Thomas City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Published Huntington Beach News,'r� 26, 1978. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GENERAL •PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub- lic hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach in the Counc'l Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hoer w of 7:30 pm, or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday the 6th day of November, 1979, for the purpose of considering one request to amend the general Plan Land Use Element and one request to amend the Circulation Element as follows: 1. South of Warner Avenue and East of Lc.sl:e Lane - redesignate 2.00 gross acres from Low Density Residential to Commercial. 2. Atlanta Avenue between Lake Street \ and Beach Boulevard - redesignate this 1/2 mile segment from a major arterial, (,120' right of way) to a primary arterial (100' right of way). The above requests are accompanied by Negative Declarations 78-51 and 77-122 respectively. Copies of General Plan Amendment 78-3 and accompanying en- vironmental documents are on file in the Planning Department. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said General Plan Amendment 78-2. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 20M Main Street, Huntington Beach,Ca.92648. DATED: October 23, 1978. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk I Publish October 26, 1978 Postage Paid Postcards 142 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing Will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7: 30 P. M. , or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday the 6th day of November 19 78, for the purpose of considering one request to amend the General Plan Land Use Element and one request @q*@9t to amend the Circulation Element as follows: 1 . South of Warner Avenue and East of Leslie Lane - redesignate 2.00 gross acres from Low Density Residential to Commercial . 2. Atlanta Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard - redesignate this 112 mile segment from a major arterial , (120' right of way) to a primary arterial (100' right of way) . �m A'(0 The above requests are accompanied by^ Declarations 78-51 and 77-122 respectively. Copies of General Plan Amendment 78-2 and accompanying environmental documents are on file in the Planning Department. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and exp=less their opinions for or against said General Plan Amendment 78-2 Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk . , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 DATED • October 23, 1978 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BY: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk - -., .- s_.,,r,•, .. ,ate. ... .. e)y Number of Excerpts !� Publish Once LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Hunti gton Beach��,"��. California, for the purpose of considering �eyl?f �(A�nAmamdw�wNi 76-Z. -11h;s W111 COKSIde�(_ one MgVesf -f t aid -NkQ- PICAM' l,awVi t)5i2 EjZ04PAAt OXkCk ova, Yeq Uesf Jfo G"(A:b 6YA F_LC* AAA as -91 lows : 1 . e10A1A S Wojfw Ave*uwe. a*td East 4- Leslie 1,a"-,� - . . reqv\gte 2.00 �x ar.�zs -�raw� I.�uu s / �es�dl� tal �i AttWr feAe ., yVt�e. `{WS /2-vnjG2- 5�r►�,v�" -Cmm a r►�taJo(' �t-leria� T 9 (too' r brt dFwa► (IW' r6ht cl- ' l) a4�al Y LO Said hearing will be eld at the hour of ' P.M. , on d in the Council Chambers Building of the L �o Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and � 1 express their opinions for or against the proposed �eVWa1�QM Further information may be obtained from .the City Planning L� Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 , DATED this day of CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By NO'I'1(.;I: TO CLERjK� '11) SCHEDULE PUISLIC HEARING ITEM � �� 1<`�N E� 745—Z _ TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: P 16L44vw, PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HE^A,RI-NNG USING T111" ATTACi11:D LEGAL NO'i'ICE FOR THE DAY OF 1978. AP's are attached AP' s will follow No AP's Initiated by: �/ Planning Commission X Planning Department X Petition X ` * Appeal Other X Adoption of Environmental Status (x) YES NO I• Refer toI�t ��yv�Ul/�` Planning Department - Extension 5Z.-77 for additional i.nformati.on. � I l appeal , please transmit exact wording co he re(lu i red in I:he LoJ 163-042-10 163-043-29 uonald F Clemens General Plan Amendment 78-AB 17101 Newquist Lame May 25, 1978 (JH) Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 163-042-11 163-042-25 146-241-26 John D Britt John E Warms Masao Nerio et al 17111 Newquist Lane 17032 Greentree Lane 7795 Westminster Avenue Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Westminster, Calif 92649 92649 92683 163-042-18 163-042-26 Ooean View School District Max S Schreiber Southern Calif Savings & Loan 7972 Warner Avenue 17112 Greentree Land 9100 Wilshire Blvd Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif BevErly Him, Calif 92647 92647 90212 163-042-19 163-043-01 Dept. ,of transportation Dwain K Liggett Thomas L D Alessandro 120 So. Spring Street 17102 Greentree Lane 5242 Vineland Drive Los Angeles, Calif 90052 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Attu: Staff Assistant 92647 92649 Design B 163-042-20 163-043-02 Ronald L Lanperts Robert C Hawes 17092 Greentree Lane 5252 Vineland Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Bch, Calif 92647 92649 163-042-21 163-043-03 Lowell Ii Romberg William L Hays Jr 17082 Greentree Lane 5262 Vineland Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 92649 163-042-22 163-043-27 William M Kakiiroto Joel.Babic 17072 Greentree La rbe 17151 Greenleaft Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92649 163-042-23 163-043-28 George B Marvosh Ted M Scott 17052 Greentree Lane 5241 Glenroy Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92649 163-042-24 163-043-29 George Arnold John C Davis 17042 Greentree Lane 5251 Glenroy Drive HWntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92G47 92649 i 163-122-01 General Plan Amendment 78-2B 163-046-06Baruch Berbenisty ilarold L Tobin May 25, 1978 (JH)6142 Wanner Avenue 17091 Greentree Lane Hunt Beach, Calif i hbntingbm Beach, Calif 92649 92649 163-122-04 163-121-23 163-046-07 darbor Bluffs DevelopmentLarry L Twombley et al B Steven Mirtle 5142 Warner Avenue Suite 205 600 Marina Drive 17101 Greentree Lane thmtington Beach, Calif Seal Beach, Calif Iiuntingbon Beach, Calif 92649 90740 92649 163-121-09 163-121-42 163-046-08 Sanwel C Hirt Alexander C Cr�aan Cecil why 8750 Shannon River Circle P.O. Boos 1123 16164 Zbrtola Circle Fountain Valley, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif ��� Beach, Calif 92708 y 92647 92649 163-121-10 163-121-43 163-042-04 au A Crucksbank Jr et al Crosman Advertising (b Charles W Castrop P.O. B 8383 Wils2ufe Blvd Suite 1040 oot U23 17011 Newquist Lane Veverly )dills, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 90211 92647 92649 163-121-11 163-046-01 163-042-05 )Urvey E Ganberg Hisa Ota et al Harlan H Rabe 6050 Warner Avenue 5242 Warner Avenue 17031 Newquist Lane Iuntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92649 92649 153-121-19 163-046-02 163-042-06 Franklin J Buccella et al Albert Arciero Robert K Lingenfelter 1866 Rhodes Drive 17041 Greentree Lane 17051 Newquist Lane Costa Mesa, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92626 , 92647 92649 163-121-20 163-046-03 163-042-07 9argaret E StGonge Ronald A Berglund Dennis D Leonard 24001 Mui.rlands Blvd Space 363 17051 Greentree Lane 17071 Newquist Lane Ill Toro, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntisx� Beach, Calif 92630 92647 92649 I 163-121-21 163-046-04 163-042-08 John D Tokaruk Kenneth D Saunders William T Barry Jr P.O. Box 1657 17071 Greentree Lane 17081 Newquist Lane i iuntingtcn Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92647 92649 163-121-22 163-046-05 163-042-09 leodolfo Espinoza Stratton J Matinas David A Harris 3121 Dunbar Avenue 17081 Greentree Lane 17091 Newquist Lane 1 iuntington Beach, Calif Huuntington Beach, Calif Iuntington Beach, Calif 92G47 92647 92649 I r,ENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 151-351-07 gc 151-351-09 gc City of Huntington BEach Title Ins. & Tr Co Dept. of Public Works Pacific Sands 6767 Forest Lawn Dr. Los Angeles, Ca. 90068 Orange County Flood Control Dist Dept. of Transportation Orange County Sanitation Dist. P.O. Box 1073 120 S. Spring St. Fred A. Harper, Gen. Mgr. Santa Ana, Calif. 92702 Los Angeles, Calif. 90052 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Calif. 92703 Huntington Beach Union Huntington Beach Elementary High School District School , 1902 17th Street Box 71 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 so. calif Edison company P.O. Box 17.1 i,=tington Beach, Calif 92648 24-270-14 Huntington Beach Ccapany 2110 Main Street Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 Cont. 24-204-20 gc 24-204-21 gc 24-204-23 gc Alice G. Sturgeon Alonzo Carter Haiasdan N. Terzian 212 Baltimore Ave. 216 Baltimore AVe. 2378 Catherine Rd. Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 Altadena, Calif. 91001 24-206-09 gc 24-206-10 gc 24-206-11 gc Chauncey H. Killian C A Bauer Josephine Hally P.O. Box 184 1737 Park St. 117 Alabama Huntington Beach, Ca. 92643 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beabb, Ca. 92648 24-206-12 gc 24-206-13 gc 24-250-54 gc John D. Gaylord Mary A. Fraux W & B .Builders, Inc. 837 W. 5th St. 1364 High St. 1666 9th St. Ontario, Calif. 91762 Auburn, Calif. 95603 Santa Monica, Calif. 90404 024-250-68. gc 24-250-70 gc 24-260-04 gc American Hawaiian Steamship Co. First American Trust Co: Intrepido Bevelopment Co. 32123 Lindero Cyn Rd. Pacific Trailer Park 31840 Village Center Rd. Suite 206 80 Huntington St. Westlake Village, Ca. 91361 Westlake Village, Ca. 91361 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 249260-12 gc 24-260-17 gc 24-260-23 gc Casa Playa Randal D. Hankins Gilbert Herrera l 1095 N. Main St. , Suite D 101 Huntington Ave. 110 Huntington St. ')range,CCalif. . 92667 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 ?4-260-24 gc 24-260-26 gc 24-260-28 gc ';eorge Renek Ira M. Hankins Carol G. Seachrist 17701 Wrightwood Lane 120 Huntington St. 909-1/2 Balboa Blvd. luntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Balboa, C&lif.92661 ?4-260-30 gc 24-260-36 gc 24-260-53 gc :orrest D. Lewis Durward J. Ferris Henry T. Stayner 112 Huntington St. 10819 Onyx Ct. %Johnson, Gloria !untington Beach, Calif. 92648 Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708 317 Crest Ave. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 14-260-75 gc 24-260-96 gc 288-021-06 gc !andal D. Hankins City of Huntington Beach State of Calif. Div. of Hwys U Baltimore Ave. Huntington Beach, Cal. 520 S. Spring St. !untington Beach, Ca. 92648 Public Works Dept. Los Angeles, Ca. 90052 4 ;-021-12 gc 148-021-17 gc 148-021-18 gc ons Grocery Co. Sigma Medical Enterprises Inca Arthur H. An'ozian V144 .0. Box 3338 Term Annex 21530 S. Pioneer Blvd. ae8 � ��� I os Angeles, Ca. 90051 Hawaiian Gardens, Calif. 90716 Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 51-351-04 gc ity of Huntington Beach GPA 78-2 Cont. 24-163-03 gc 24-164-01 gc 24-164-02 gc Norma A. Nelson Hayward C. Johnson Edward F. Bray 114 Ocean Ave. 730 14th St. P.O. Box 209 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 24-164-03 gc 24-164-04 gc 24-164-05 gc George Deundian Donald M. Perry Hugh G. White 317' 2nd St. 313' 2nd St. 309 2nd St. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92643 Huntington Beach, 6a. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 24-164-06 gc . 24-164-07 gc 024-165-01 gc Beatrice M. Brown Dennis Niccole Atlantic Oil Co. 305 2nd St. 400 3rd St. 523 W. 6th St. , Room 1116 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Los Angeles, Ca. 90014 24-165-02 gc 024-165-03 gc 024-165-06 gc Otillia M. Van Leuven. Julio Felli Russell B. Watkins Box 236 215 2nd St. 1090 Buckingham Ln. Bryn Mawr, Calif. 92318 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 24-165-17 gc 24-204-01 gc 24-204-02 gc David P. Perumean Robert E. Meyer Dennis A. Niccole George Richards, 836 Presidio Dr. 400 3rd St. 211 2nd St. Costa Meaa, Ca. 92626 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 24-204-03 gc 24-204-04 gc 24-204-07 gc Martin H. Walley John A. Galkin Alice G. Sturgeon 624 112 Hartford St. 101 Huntington St. 212 Baltimore Ave. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92643 24-204-08 gc 24-204-12 gc 24-204-13 . gc Cloyce B. Lancaster Marion Williams Viola Breeding 206 Baltimore Ave. 180 Wilsho Dr. 110 Alabama Ave. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Hazleton, Pa. 18201 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 24-204-14 gc 240204-15 gc .24-204-16 gc Wallace L. Nilson Adrian M. 0 Beck Frank H. Green 106 Alabama Ave. 16592 Kettler Lane 4621 Los Patos Dr. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 24-204-17 gc 24-204-18 gc 24-204-19 gc Edward T. Conlon Marvin Shumate Horace Stovall 227 9th St. 218 Baltimore Ave. 948 llth St. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92643 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92643 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 24-161-01 gc 24■161-06 gc 24-161-07 gc :tita M. Palladino Patti A. Jewett Fletcher H. Dart 400 S. Mariposa, Apt. 24 302 8dd St. 310 2nd St. Los Angeles, Ca. 90020 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 24-161-11 gc 24-161-12 gc 24-161-13 gc ,John I. Parnakian George Deudian Robert G. Palladino 205 Lake St. 317 2nd St. Geraldine Westad Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 25241 Hartog St. Laguna Hills, Ca. 92653 24-161-14 gc 24-162-01 gc 24-162-02 gc Alfred J. Palladino Elsie M. Bakre Harold E. Tomkins 10 E. Huntington Dr. Elsie M. Smith 231 Lake St. Arcadia, Calif. 91006 23571 E1 Cerrito Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Laguna Hills, Calif. 92653 24-162-03 gc 24-162-04 gc 24-162-05 gc Harold E. Tomkins John A. Galkin Etta Lamb 231 Lake St. 101 Huntington St. 18752 Gregory Lane Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 24-162-08 gc 24-162-09 gc 24-162-12 gc Louis J. Fraser Otillia M. Van Leuven Leonard 0. Lindborg 11051 Trask Box 236 112 18th St. Carden Grove, Calif. 92640 Bryn Mawr, Calif. 92318 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 24-162-13 gc 24-162-16 gc 24-162-17 gc (tiles E. Wallace Carolin Resendez Harry B. Ling 502 Calffornia Street 222 2nd St. 5401 S. Mesagrove AVe. Huntington Beach, Califl 92648 P.O. Box 167 Whittier, Calif. 90601 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 24-162-19 gc 24-162-20 gc 24-162-21 gc Hadge De Lapp Sheffield James J. Redman Paul E. Palmer 320 Joliet Ave. 43846 N. Cedar 14325 E. Flomar Dr. Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 Lancaster, Calif. 93534 Whittier, Calif. 90603 24-162-22 gc 24-162-23 gc 24-162-24 gc Carolin S. Resendez John Parnakian Charles Vanian P.O. Box 167 205 Lake Street 201 Lake St. , Apt. B 2.22 2nd St. Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92643 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92643 24-162-25 gc 24-163-01 gc 24-163-02 gc Barbara J. Firey City of Huntington Beach Thomas Holwerda 4924 Marlborough !Jay P.O. Box 190 2701 Fairview Rd. Carmichael , Calif. 95608 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Costa Mesa, California 92627 f I Published Huntington Beach News Oct. 26, 1978. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO CONTINUANCE OF AREA OF CONCERN 2.2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub- I:c heering will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 pm, or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday the 6th day of November, 1978, for the purpose of con- sidering an appeal to the Planning Com- mission's cont:nuance of Area of Concern 2.2 to General Plan Amendment 79-1; a request to amend the land use desig- nation from low-density residential to i medium density residential on 16.48 acres of land located south oil Warner 'Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica Street. A copy of the -proposal is on file in the Planning Department. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal .to that portion of General Plan Amendment 78-2. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, Cali- fornia 92648 (714) 536-5226. DATED: October 24, 1978. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk • r ST�f" d c7 fP�/<L3J-L Mo a Developrn nt 417 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 (714) 54r2-37 STATE I.It:E;tJSE NO.31 I-R88 .✓ �, r�� L HAND DELIVERED ,.J October 24 , 1978 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn : City Clerks Office Re : General Plan Amendment 78-2 (2 . 2) Tabling of Proposed General Plan Amendment Gentlemen : Mola Development Corporation hereby appeals to the Huntington Beach City Council from the decision of the Planning Commission on October 17 , 1978 to table 2 . 2 of General Plan Amendment 78-2 until General Plan 79-1 is heard in early 1979. We enclose our $75. 00 appeal fee and would ask that this matter be set before the Council as soon as possible. The basis of thO appeal is that the decision to table the matter until 1979 without a request for new information to be generated by staff is illogical under the circumstances and presents ahardship for owners of property in the affected area in that they cannot make development commitments until the General Plan Amendment is acted upon. Further , the initial request to change the density from low to medium on the General Plan was initiated by the City of Huntington Beach itself and should therefore be addressed and not tabled. Based upon the above comments , and for other reasons to be brought to the attention of the Council it is respectfully requested - that the Planning Commission decision be overturned. Very. tru�y yours , Peter E. yvon Elten General Counsel PEvE/mt Enclosure Publish October 26, 1978 Prepaid Postcards 80 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO CONTINUANCE OF AREA OF CONCERN 2.2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the . City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of �7:30` P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday the 6th day of November , 19 78, for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's continuance of Area of Concern 2.2 to General Plan Amendment 79-1; a request to amend the land use designation e�. from low-density residential to medium density residential on 16.48 acres aad land located south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica Street. A copy of the proposal is on file in the Planning Department. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal to that portion of General Plan Amendment 78-2. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk ., 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5226 DATED.. October 24, 1978 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BY: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk bPca�IG�(t�J 2Z WE4ALPUW AMDNDME*AT 1gi 2. -f1,. z... �(av�v���ow��►n�ssroh's �h�r,�ncsz � Ayra cT CoKcern Z. Z P(aAA AwwAAdwxof 78"Z, A "tsesl' -fv aw �d l6e, ("d. uw- cks��{,naho►n xvo�n 6x) dw%+j �tdou{t0.l -h> w�edt•w� d�asi� ll�S�dwn-h'a I oY\ l(o.46 s«^ � 11��A%.r� e, oMd east CC- U!Sc� CHica Sfirafi. A is ovl to T("A(*Vll . . a�a� ai- sued a��l � -oaf �kart aF Euv�,,m l PjWC,0 f APJ WO, AP04.,l) (0"MM44tjct of ca►JGCWJ 2 s 2 �►6RA1�PLP�N A►1�UME�KT '(S-Z. �6�Z+M�(�O� l9 73 'Clue '�� P(O.AV-A i� anIsc-qov►'s nOCUAcJL CoKc¢rn 2 Z S C-u� RaAl\ AmojAdwx44f 78'Z,� a kqwst' -{o aM..,aMd "(t&e_ ("d, u52 Awst,Esi � fio►n kjw al�� �dsucEcal -tom rv�edI•w4n kw V�S�t�a�n-h'al o� llo.� ar�s�(ov�d 4eA <.--IC^ ftr oAA,d easFA c� �xl5c� CHica Sfi�afi. Qccpy pefmak i5 O-Vi -9z tv, zt� t. . .. aya��sf' s�i�d a� 1 -� -1fi�af- (b►�kor� aF Ezar�,,a,l V(aM A�M4w�ta44- 7�� I 163-121-20 163-043-19 I ;iichael W Cyst General Plan Amendmit 78-2 Orgaret E St Onge 17231 Greenleaf Lane 2.2 :youth of Warner - east 24001 Muirlands Blvd 363 Huntington heath, Calif of Bolsa Chita Space E1 Toro,, Calif 92630 /92649 Sept. 21, 1978 (Jii) 63-043-2U 163-121-03 163-121-21 1 Francis 2 Bergonz Richard M. Deam John D Tokaruk 172ll Greenleaf Lane 5taven C Rose P.U. Box 1657 17221 Greenleaf beach, Calif 19601 Roderick Lane Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92647 163-121-04 163-121-22 163-U43-21 Richard R Rule et al Rodolfo Espinoza David M Manson 5075 Warner Ave Suite C 5121 Dunbar Avenue P.O. Box 605 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 'fiord, Tws 92649 92649 76021 163-121-05 163-121-23 1G3-043-22 Sanuel Sogoian et al Larry L Tu mbley et al Richard R Tont.i 3892 Sirius Drive 600 Marina Drive 17191 Greenleaf Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Seal Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 90740 92649 163-043-23 163-121-07 163-121-24 Harold B Seibert Stephen F Downs Stphen F Dawns 17201 Greenleaf Lane 5092 Warner Avenue 16341 S Pacific Avenue 1untington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Sunset Beach, Calif 92649 92649 90742 163-043-25 163-121-08 163-121-25 Stanley O Kran Samuel C Hirt John D Tokaruk 19441 Surfdale die 8750 Shannon River circle 16591 Channel Lau�e Huntington Beach, Calif Fountain Valley, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92708 92649 163-121-10 163-121-26 ! arianee Win A Cruik.�� Jr et al Michael Sarkin et al 17171nGr a leaf Lane 8383 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1040 600 Marina Drive 17171 Greenleaf Lane iluntington Beach', Calif Heverly Hills, Calif 90211 Seal Beach, Calif 92649 90740 163-121-01 163-121-11 163-121-27 Douglas StaiAons Inc Harvey E Gad)erg Charles F Funsch P.O. Box 2500 6050 Warner Avenue 5051 Dunbar Avenue Costa Mesa, Calif Huntington Beach, calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92626 92647 92649 I 163-121-02 163-121-19 163-121-28 Lester W Kuelme Franklin J Bucoella et al Martin B Slatta 17032 Bolsa Chita 1866 Rhpdes Drive 3622 Serene Way Huntington Beach, Calif Costa Mesa, Calif f92626 Lam• Washington 92u49 98036 I 163-131-21 General Plan Amendment 78-2 Ocean View School District Hearbert V Swanigan 2.2 South of Warner - east of 2972 Warner Avenue 17132 - A Harbor Bluffs Cir. Boisa Chica Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Sept. 25, 1978 (JH) 92647 92649 146-241-25 163-281-01 Resident Masao Nerio et al 4961 Los Pates Avenue 9340 Bolsa Avenue Huntington Beach, Calif Westminster, Calif 92649 92683 146-241-38 Wit163-281Mul Resident Breuer-Harrison Ina 801 S Muller 4971 Los Pates Avenue Breuer, C. J. Suite a Garfield Avenue Huntington Beach, Calif 1750 Tad era Vista Drive Suite ra, 92649 Fullerton, Calif 92631 Allx ►bra, Calif 91801 163-281-02 146-241-40 Alert F Curtis Jr et al Resident Sidney A Qmssley et al 4952 Warner Avenue 4981 Los Pates Avenue 1055 Rose Avenue thuitington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Palm Springs, Calif 92649 92649 92262 163-281-06 146-241-43 the Cambridge Ankirk Dev. Uorp Resident Virgie M Tackaberry L5 Brookhollow Drive 4952 Seapine Circle 5061 Warner Avenue Santa Ana, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif I2705 92649 92647 _63-281-15 146-241-46 Yank J Mola Resident Ten Aquarius et al �19 Main Street 4942 Seapine Circle None Holloway tuntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 5075 Wang Avenue 12648 92649 Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 63-281-05 146-241-47 o. Calif Edison Co. Resident Enrique G Gang .O. Bar ill 4932 Seapine Circle 16992 Courtney Lane untington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Iuntington Beach, Calif 2648 92649 92649 rsident Resident 331 Los Pates Avenue 4931 Seapine Circle mti,ngton Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif ?649 2fd2x 92649 !sident Dept of transportation 41 Los Patos Avenge 120 So. Spring Street ntington Beach, Calif Los Angeles, Calif 90052 649 Attn: Staff Assistant - B 163-121-29 163-122-06 Paul H Penrod General Plan Amendment 78-2 Byron L Ryberg 5021 Dunbar Avenue 2.2 South of Warner - east 17062 Lelsie Lane Huntington BeachwCalif of Bolsa Chica Huntingtron Beach, Calif 92649 Sept. 25, 1978 (JH) 92649 163-121-30 163-121-41 163-122-09 ba rtara E Baker Ha cold E Tdain et al William H Wilson 17042 Bolsa Chica 5142 Warner Avenue 16961 Bolero Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 92649 92649 163-121-31 163-121-42 163-122-10 Jean M Anderson Alexander C Crosman William A Wood et al 17062 Bolsa Chica P.O. Box 1123 17092 Harbor Bluff Circle Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 92647 92649 163-121-32 163-121-43 163-131-06 T!%m as Kardos Crosman Advertising F B Clendenen et al 16860 Pacific Coast Highway P.O. Box U23 250 Poppy Sunset Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Corn Del Mar, Calif 9U742 29a 92647 92625 163-121-33 163-121-44 163-131-12 11xinas itardos Ivy Ong Ann J Larson et al 17112 Bolsa Chica Street 2120 Main Street Suite 275 5142 Thorn Tree Lane Ifunti ngton Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Irvine, Calif 92649 92648 92715 163-121-34 163-121-46 163-131-16 Milo E Cote BucveIla Investments Timothy Spangler 2308 Longbow Drive 2120 Main Street 17171 Harbor Bluffs Circle Twin Falls, Idaho Rmtington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 83301 92648 92649 163-121-35 163-122-01 163-131-17 K Frank Wynia H. E. Tobin Nelson H McCrady 3970 Grand View Blvd Apt 23 5142 Warner Avenue .P.O. Box 2220 Los Angeles, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Seal Beach, Calif 90066 92649 90740 163-121-36 163-122-04 163-131-18 t3ola J Wallace et al Daniel H Ong Tom Stadel Jola J Delleney 17062 Harbor Bluffs Circle 3456 Pluneria Place P.O. Box 103 Huntington Beach, Calif Costa Mesa, Calif Sunset Beach, Calif, 9U742 92649 92626 163-121-38 163-122-05 163-131-19 Ibbert W Karger Majid B Harb Don K Louie et al j072 Dunbar St rec-at. 17052 Leslie Iane 1445 Cataino Meleno Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Santa Barbara, Calif 92649 92649 93111 I 8 - ItMU Alt ;pqg =WAY 6"L6 � —� anv •wQas jl 6►9Z6 XWM e tmqburwm 6►9t6 3 � KNOW WnlPd OR TEO 4uopTgw 5t9Z6 6t9Z6' �TVJ ,�w� umburtum �TTe'J 'weanuogFytrTztmp �TTYJ w�'ee ��ia� �1� MOT �'T-m evTams CutTTT me ' m �P'T •ap tme� 3TTQ'J '� Lt-TVZ-9►T SO-TBZ-f9! i 09t6 ;TM�ttiUR • 6►9Z6 ;cTvJ t7�a8 �R v "U�! SLOS f t gave tagb� AmvDITA(. "r ' I eT=TJ swam Zt6► 3e0 a4S u vK 6Tt 9t-Ttt-9tT ST-T8Z-E9T SOLZd � Lt9Z6 6►9Z6 , w TW1JI5 iTTw. '409% uM&ITWM NORM �46eT3�p e++T�7 ��'iTaO �e ST I �e�v sE'�91N T90S aT�T� �T'�'o3 Z'S6f c�top •� �(x?�f eiGQ'T2i►eq et�y 4 N WT� . ,.� E t-TtZ-9►T 90-t8L-f3T ►9Z6 6"m Z 9ZZ6 6 3TTQJ 't>l: 004ft um ;Tm 'eftnift ewd ;TTaJ NOWN UD4&UT7eM Garen{ 2vuMN, mt eme[+Y am* SSOT GMJNLV SOVb MI TOO T� =r sr�=ro i 32 T4 4a AsTesa� v ITS 0►-ttZ-�tT tO-TBZ-f9T _ I TE9Z6 ITTRO 'ui4zwrr d 6t9Z6 4O8TE �TR�'r "O LOT �R�B WATao WAWA e2WWI OSLT iTM NOWN U04ftnum antr�r►Y p'�'T;24 9 TM *o '��e OM=bw qua MI TL6t � � MI eoT�R_JWMM - =PT BE-T►L-9tT � tO-TBZ-flT I E89Z6 - - 6►9L6 TTP all 'tPae m4b�'i� WY elTCT 0►£6 WVAWY /C4M At T960 TV '30 072aN a mm TO-Tw-M SZ-TtZ-"T (a[") 6L61 'St 'ems - -6� . ITTeO 'fie � ao� awe ;TTR3 'ttaave uagbtrj*tl1 � vt7ir►Y 2sum" ZL6L ;'D Is" - 2wnm ;° tw Z•Z � -XTO *;� �Te R Y - MLT loTinam po MTA e�0 Z-8L �f W[d TvXGUOO TE-TIrT-M T'� �"L 31'Z ,y M la Development 417 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 (714) 5&6-2!%7 STATE LICENSE NO.311-888 a.sn .Cf' I O r G HAND DELIVERED T,! y �` -J c October 24 , 1978 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: City Clerks Office Re: General Plan Amendment 78-2 (2. 2) Tabling of Proposed General Plan Amendment Gentlemen: Mola Development Corporation hereby appeals to the Huntington Beach City Council from the decision of the Planning Commission on October 17 , 1978 to table 2. 2 of General Plan Amendment 78-2 until General Plan 79-1 is heard in early 1979. We enclose our $75. 00 appeal fee and would ask that this matter be set before the Council as soon as possible. The basis of the appeal is that the decision to table the matter until 1979 without a request for new information to be generated by staff is illogical under the circumstances and presents a hardship for owners of property in the affected area in that they cannot make development commitments until the General Plan Amendment is acted upon. Further, the initial request to change the density from low to medium on the General Plan was initiated by the City of Huntington Beach itself and should therefore be addressed and not tabled. Based upon the above comments , and for other reasons to be brought to the attention of the Council it is respectfully requested that the Planning Commission decision be overturned. ;Veryurs, eElte General Counsel PEvE/mt Enclosure Mola Development __ 417 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH.CA 92648 (714)536-2547 State License No.335-113 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I 1 f , HAND DELIVERED 1 � J r • PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Proof of Publication of County of Orange 1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eigh- teen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the HUNTINGTON BEACH NEWS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and pub- Published Huntington Beach New o •lished at 208 Main Street in the City of Hunting- 26, 1978. ' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ton Beach County of Orange, and which newspaper 'APPEAL TO CONTINUANCE OF AREA OF CONCERN 2.2 has been adjudicated a newspaper of general circu- GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 79-2 lation by the Superior Court of the County of Or. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub- lic hearing will be held by the City ange, State of California, under the date of August Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council 'Chamber of the Civic 27th, 1937, Case Number A-5931; that the notice, Center; Huntington Beach, at the hour of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type passib ll pm, or as Soon thereafter as 7:3 pe, on Monday the 6th day of not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in November, 1978, for the purpose of con- sidering an appeal to the Planning Com- each regular and entire issue of said newspaper mission's cont.nuance of Area of Concern and not in. any supplement thereof on the following2.2 to General Plan Amendment 79-1; a •equest to amend the land use desig- dates, to-Wit: nation from low-density residential to medium density residential on 16.48 acres of land located south of Warner Oct. . 2 V Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica Street. A copy of the proposal is on file in the all in the year 19 78. . . . . . . Planning Department. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal to certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that `hat portion of General Plan Amendment 78 2' the foregoing is t and correct. g g rue Further information .may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Datted at Huntington Beach his.27th Main Street, Huntington Beach, Cali- r California,r irorn'a 9264E (714) 536-6226. DATED: October 24, 1978. day of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Octo.bP O CITY OF HU. Wentworth BEPCH r., 19.78. By: Alicia M. Wentworth , City Clerk . . . . . . . - -- - Signature TT PROOF OF PUBLICATION City of Huntington Beach County of Orange State of California Affidavitof Publication Filed Clerk By — Deputy Clerk REQUE6T FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Suomitted by ,lames' W_ pal ;n Department Planning Date Prepared October 27, 1978 , 19 78 Backup Material Attached 0 Yes No Subject GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended. �'�� !�� �J Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: 4, STATEMENT OF ISSUE: o General Plan Amendment 78-2 constitutes the second amendment to the General Plan in 1978 . At the October 17 , 1978 public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted recommendations for areas of concern 2 . 1 and 2 . 3 and voted to continue area of concern 2. 2 to General Plan Amendment 79-1. The Planning Commission' s decision to continue area of concern 2. 2 has been appealed by a property owner in the affected area. A copy of the letter of appeal is attached for your consideration. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission adopted Resolution 1236 recommending adoption of General Plan Amendment 78-2 by the following vote: AYES: Higgins , Russell, Stern, Finley, Cohen, Bazil - - NOES: None ABSENT: Paone RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends that the City Council deny the appeal tC the Planning Commission' s decision to continue Area of Concern 2. 2, and recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution adopting General Plan Amendment 78-2. ANALYSIS: General Plan Amendment 78-2 addresses two requests to amend the Land Use Element and one request to amend the Circulation Element. The first area of concern (2. 1) addresses a request from the property owner to redesignate 2. 00 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Leslie Lane from Low Density Residential to General Commercial. The applicant envisions the construction of two office professional buildings on the site. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of this request with the stipulation that the property subsequently be rezoned to allow non-medical office professional uses. V GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 Page 2 Area of Concern 2 . 2 encompasses 16 .48 acres of land located south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica Street. This area was included at the request of the Planning Commission who, after considering Zone Change 78-5 on March 7 , 1978 , directed staff to analyze the redesignation of the property north of Dunbar Street to Medium Density Residential. Because of the sewer and water assessment district which serves Dunbar Street residents, the staff expanded the area of concern to include properties on both sides of the street. The Planning Commission voted to continue Area- of Concern 2. 2 to General Plan Amendment 79-1 in order to analyze additional mixes of land uses for the area. A property owner in the affected area has appealed the Planning Commission' s decision to continue this area. A copy of the applicant' s letter is attached for your consideration. The third area of concern involves a request to amend the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways on Atlanta Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard. On September 6, 1978 , the Planning Commission directed staff to include the reduction of Atlanta Avenue from a major arterial to a primary arterial with a 100-foot right-of-way in General Plan Amendment 78-2 . This amendment will allow staff to proceed with the revocation of Precise Plan of Street Alignments 70-4 and the preparation of a new precise plan for Atlanta Avenue and Lake Street. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of this item. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Area of Concern 2 . 1 is covered by Negative Declaration 78-51 , which was posted in the Office of the City Clerk for a ten-day review period ending June 5 , 1978 . Area of Concern 2 . 2 is covered by EIR 77-3 , which was prepared in conjunction with General Plan Amendment 77-1 and was adopted by the City Council in August 1977 . Area of Concern 2 . 3 is covered by Negative Declaration 77-122 , which was prepared in conjunction with Precise Plan of Street Alignment 77-3 and posted in the office of the City Clerk for a ten-day review period ending November 14 , 1977. Copies of these environmental documents have been included in the appendix of General Plan Amendment 78-2 or are on file in the Planning Department. FUNDING SOURCE: None required. ALTERNATIVES: The City Council may adopt the requested changes as recommended or as it wishes to modify them, or may retain the existing designations on the Land Use and Circulation Elements. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 Page 3 Respectfully submitted, Z��O ames D. Palin ?ATTACHMENTS: cting Planning Director 1. Summary of Planning Commission Actions on Each Item 2. Resolution 3. General Plan Amendment 78-2 4 . General Plan Amendment 78-2 Summary Sheet 5. Letter of Appeal for Area of Concern 2.2 WH: ja SUMMARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 OCTOBER 17, 1978 AREA OF CONCERN 2. 1 ON MOTION BY STERN AND SECOND BY COHEN NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 78-51 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Russell, Stern, Finley, Cohen, Bazil NOES: None ABSENT: Paone ON MOTION BY STERN AND SECOND BY BAZIL AREA OF CONCERN 2 .1, REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF DESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL, WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Russell, Stern, Finley, Cohen, Bazil NOES : None ABSENT: Paone AREA OF CONCERN 2. 2 A MOTION WAS MADE BY STERN TO APPROVE AREA OF CONCERN 2 . 2 FOR MEDIUM DENSITY DESIGNATION. THE MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY COHEN TO REDESIGNATE THE NORTHEAST 1. 66 ACRES TO MEDIUM DENSITY AND RETAIN LOW DENSITY ON THE REMAINDER OF AREA OF CONCERN 2. 2 AYES: Higgins, Bazil, Cohen NOES: Russell, Stern, Finley ABSENT: Paone THE MOTION FAILED. ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY RUSSELL AREA OF CONCERN WAS WITHDRAWN FROM GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 AND CONTINUED TO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 79-1 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Russell, Finely, Cohen, .-Bazil . NOES: Stern ABSENT: Paone AREA OF CONCERN 2. 3 ON MOTION BY STERN AND SECOND BY BAZIL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 77-122 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Russell, Finely, Cohen, Bazil NOES: None ABSENT: Paone ON MOTION BY STERN AND SECOND BY HIGGINS AREA OF CONCERN 2 . 3 WAS ADOPTED WHICH IS A CHANGE IN THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT FOR THE SEG- MENT OF ATLANTA AVENUE BETWEEN LAKE STREET AND BEACH BOULEVARD FROM MAJOR ARTERIAL TO PRIMARY ARTERIAL AND DELETE ANY INDICATION OF NEW ALIGNMENT BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Russell, Stern, Finely, Cohen, Bazil NOES: None ABSENT: Paone ON MOTION BY STERN AND SECOND BY HIGGINS RESOLUTION 1236 WHICH ADOPTS PREVIOUS STRAW VOTES WITH THE CHANGE REFLECTED IN THE CIRCU- LATION ELEMENT ON AREA OF CONCERN 2. 3 OF GENERAL PLAN_AMENDMENT 78-2 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Russell, Stern, Finley, Cohen, Bazil NOES: None ABSENT: Paone GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 SUMMARY Planning Planning city Area of Environmental Department Commission Council Concern Location Acreage Applicant Request Status Recarmendation Action Action 2.1 South of Warner Ave. 2.00 RMJ Corp. From Low Density ND 78-51 Redesignate Area redes- East of Leslie Lane Residential to area commer- ignated Commercial cial commercial . 2.2 South of Warner Ave. 16.48 Referred From Low Density EIR 77-3 Retain Low Area contin- Subject to East of Bolsa Chica by Plan- Residential to Density ued to approval Street ning Com- Medium Density Residential GPA 79-1 of appeal mission Residential designation 2.3 Atlanta Avenue 1/2 mile Referred From major arterial ND 77-122 Redesignate Atlanta Ave. between Lake Street segment by Plan- to primary arterial major arterial redesignated and Beach Boule- ning Com- major arterial vard mission PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Proof of Publication of County of Orange I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eigh- teen ears, and not a art to or interested in the Published Huntington Beach News, Oct.' Y party 26, 1978. above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of ROTICt 011' PUiBBTLIC. HEA04UG- GENERA-L- LAjN;'A$PEWOMIENdu78-2 1 the printer of the HUNTINGTON BEACH NEWS, a NOTICE i6'Hil3R-EBY2§07J8N tlal a pub- lic heaiirf w'rli 9e- _,etdbt" City " newspaper of general circulation, printed and pub- :Council of f ' City dP'HunV4g.tor 3earh lished at 208 Main Street in the City of Hunting- in the Got,ncii Chamber of the civic " Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour ton Beach County of Orange, and which newspaper of 7:30 pm, or as soon thereafter as has been adjudicated a newspaper of general circu• possible, or, Monday the 6th day ofNovember, 1978, for the purpose of lation by the Superior Court of the County of Or. ceneiderinll one request to amend the ;enerat Ptan Land Use Element and ange, State of California, under the date of August one request to amend the Circulation Element s 27th, 1937, Case Number A-5931; that the notice, 1. SouthofoWarner Avenue and East oi'1LE-s , of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type acT a from redesignate e!fi gross 1. acres from Low Density Residential j not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in to Commercial. i- 2. Atlanta Avenue between Lake Street i each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and Beach Boulevard - redesignatel+ this y7 mile segment from a major! and not in, any supplement thereof on the following arterial, (120' right Gf way) to a{ dates, to-wit' primary arterial (100' right of way) r The above requests are accompanied i. Uy Negative Declarations 78-51 and 77-122'. Q4,* z•V 'espectively. Copies of General Plan V V Amendment 78-2 and accompanying en- vironmental documents are on file in all in the year 19 .78. . . . . . the Planning Department. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that 'opinions for or against said General Plan Amendment '78-2. the foregoing is true and correct. Furiher information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Dated at Huntington Beach, California, this. 27.th DOTED: October 23, 1978. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BY: Alic'a M. Wentworth day of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0C tObe.r. •, 19.7.8 . . . .. City Clerk _ Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION City of Huntington Beach County of Orange State of California Affidavitof Publication Filed Clerk By Deputy Clerk