Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeneral Plan Amendment 78-3 - GPA 78-3 - Resolution 4708 r U. ..tee '.. RESOLUTION NO. 4708 A' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 78-3 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires to update - and refine the General Plan in keeping with changing community needs and objectives ; and WHEREAS, amendment of the Land Use Element is necessary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan; and Y WHEREAS , public hearing on adoption of. said amendment was duly conducted before the Planning Commission on November 21, 1978, and approved 'by a majority of the .voting members of the .Commission. Thereafter, the City Council, after giving notice as prescribed by Government Code Section 65355, held at least one public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No . 78-3; and WHEREAS, at said hearing before the City Council all persons desiring to be heard on said amendment were heard, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, pursuant to provisions of Title 7, Chapter 3, Article 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 65357, that General Plan Amendment No. 78-3 , consisting of 13 . 65 acres of land located. south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica Street as depicted in Figure 2-2 of General Plan Amendment. No. 78-3, excepting there- from the northerly 431 feet of the westerly 286 feet measured from the centerline of Bolsa Chica Street, be redesignated from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, and the Land Use Element of the General Plan is hereby amended accordingly. ,,ps '1/78 1. 4a, PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of December 197Q ew Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk ty Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: WIED AND APPROVED: C ' y Administrator Acting Planning Director 2. �yu�.��i�'..':u, 'N.. .,t' `.4P•'cY9% �'i::�:E�'f.`itR' ;r.... ..<. R�;^ _v�. .. - '�;'sn",';ii,'; :;;?''«v:% :�{.t!t;}X�7eti7.(.4In.J'�•".;{`F.iF"+r 8 4i$;ii`'y ,'M; ,,x ga, > :,.:•,�:.r,,`„ `,. .,h`.�i..t.,•I.t�`...C7+;.::�w 4't�d�l'.'4�.••,.d,s NQ• 7 O S'CATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ' COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach; and.ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of . members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven,; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of moie .than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of December 19 78 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: MacAllister, Bailey, Mandic; Pattinson NOES: Councilmen: Thomas, Siebert ABSENT: Councilmen: Shenkman City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the ,City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California IN THE Superior Court OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange ...CITY...OT---H.UNT.I.NGTOM...BE.A.C.H.9....CTT.Y­.C.LER.K--- PROOF OF PUBLICATION ...................................................................................................... Pub tic•Hearing-No..-78r3...................... -NCO LIC HEARING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 70 State of California 1SS. NOTICE IS HEREBY qIVEN'that a County of Orange public hearing will be held by thefUty Council of the City of.Huntington&akh' in the Council Chamberof the Civic'Cen. ..Rild...J.v...RiChler.......................................................... ter, HunUngton,-I}eadh,"it,, he,holml,of 7:30 P M•,or'as soon. thereafter as poesi- ble,on,Wondai the 48th-day of Deceim- bar,108jorth6 purpose of considering That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of the General Plan Amendment 78-3,a req��'est United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I am not a to amend the,Land Use Element Irom party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter;that I am the Low Density Residential to Medipm Density Residential on 16.48 acres,of principal clerk of the printer of the land located south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolas Chica Street. A legal description is on file ifi'tlie Plan Department. . *' 1; ..Runtington.Beach..Ind e.p.enden t..Review ... interested persons are invite&to a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of attend said bearing and express-their for or against said General Plan Amendment78-3. ' ' ',: '�' , --Kuntington--Beac-h.................................... Further information may be'obtaified from the Office of the City Clerk,'2000 Main Street,Htintihgton Beach,Calif6r County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the dis- nis 92648.' semination of local news and intelligence of a general character, DitiW:November 22,1978. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still By:ALICIA M.WENTWORTH, has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers,and which City Clerk newspaper has been established,printed and published at regular Pub.Nov.30,1978 intervals in the said County of Orange for a period exceeding one Hunt.Beach Ind.Rev. 10539 year; that the notice,of which the annexed is a printed copy,has been published in the regular and entire issue of said newspaper, and not in any supplement thereof,on the following dates,to wit: November 309 1978 ................................................................. ................................................................. ................................................................. I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at .....................Ganden..Grome............. #Ciforn?ith,is. .310.t h 00 .... 90 . ..... .. .... ...... ... .... ................. Signature Form No.CAF-51377 REQUE6 f FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Department Submitted by James W. Palin Planning & Environmental Resource: Date Prepared December 5 , , 19 78 Backup Material Attached © Yes No Subject GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 78-3 City Administrator's Comments pche a Approve the Planning Commission' s recommendation and adopt the4Resolution. , If the City Council desires to approve the staffs recommendation, the _ Acting Planning_ Director will be prepared to present the appropriate resolution for approval . Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: General Plan Amendment No. 78-3 is the third amendment to the General Plan for 1978 . At the November 21, 1978 public hearing, -the Planning Commission adopted a recommendation amending the majority of the area of concern and retaining the existing designation on the remainder of the area. PLANNINC, COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 1239 recommending adoption of Alternative E shown in Figure 2-7 of General Plan Amendment 78-3, by the following vote: AYES : Higgins, Russell, Stern, Finley, Cohen, Paone NOES: None ABSENT': Bazil RECOMMENDATION: ,,Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Alternative B shown in Figure 2-6 of General Plan Amendment 78-3 . ANALYSIS: General Plan Amendment 78-3 addresses a request to amend the Land Use Designation of 16 . 48 gross acres located south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica Street from low density residential to medium density residential. This area of concern was continued from General Plan Amendment 78-2 by the Planning Commission to consider additional \ mixes of land uses for the area. On November 21, 1978, the Planning Commission approved the medium density residential designation for /\ GPA 78-3 12/8/78 Page 2 13 . 65 acres of the area of concern and retained- the low density residential designation on the remaining 2 . 83 acres . Staff was directed to review this 2 . 83 acre site as part of the General Plan Amendment 79-1. In regard to the portion of the area being continued, the Planning Commission discussed the possiblity of placing a commercial designation on this property and utilizing a Q zone for the purpose of consolidating properties within and to the immediate north of the area of concern to create a contiguous integrated commercial development along Bolsa Chica Street. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The amendment request is covered by EIR 77-3, which was prepared in conjunction with General _Plan 77-1 and adopted by the Council in August, 1977 . Copies of this EIR are on file in the Planning Department. FUNDING SOURCE: None required. ALTERNATIVES: The City Council may adopt the requested change as recommended or anv of the alternatives presented in Fiaure 2-6 . Respectfully submitted, James W. Palin Actinq Planning Director JW7P/BH/dc Attachments : i . Resolution No. 2 . General Plan Amendment 78-3 —!— WARNER WARNC R' cor,tMERclaL A"-IiCIAL I `J I R CR L I r!,. -_ T..- -..:I D�rCAR CRv 1 _ crr, : :::: : : ::::: ::::::::::: : :::: : :: :::: : crr �• J ::::::::: :::::::. . . rp J ... . r�. o i ....... 4 :: : :::: :::: O © : ::::::::::: :I © : : : ::.. : .:: : : : .:: ::... . .. . .. .... . r11�.i1�i �. rtl�-�ii ,<�•. �-� DENSITY DENSITY Liz/ A B I_0VN DENSITY MI-DIUM DENSITY + WARNER + WARNER T 1 r- i T ---- 1 Q Q LVISAR OR (AX39Ak t Ui ! Cr, O - - - — DENSITY DENSITY i fE;)g)ff 1:3 I huntington beach planning department 1_4 . 2 . 1 . 4 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that the meditim density residential designation be adopted for 13 . 65 acres of the area. of concern , as shown in Figure 2-7 below. The Commission retained the low density residential designation on the north west 2 . 83 acres and has requested that Staff analyze the feasibility' of a commercial designation for this property as part. of General Plan Amendment 79-1 . WARNER - -------- -- COMMERCIAL Q - T L 01�J ruse:rw.:: DENSITI — -. ..... . ........ .... ................. . MEDIUM ... . .................. ...................................... ............... O CO P� DENSITY Figure 2-7 i PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION All R1,11 Foblish November 30, 1978• POs tc Ord$ NOTICE ®T PUBLIC _BARING GENERAL PLAN AMEMDMENT 78-3 NOTICE IS H4RE ' : GIVLN .that -,-a public;, hearing will be -hel y _the City Council of the City of 1titl'.tiogtoi'f leech, in .the Council Chamber .of the 'Civic: at:.t:he hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter eus pos�iblo, on. Monday the 18th day of December s ..1'9.78 , for 'the purse 'of considering General Plan Amendment 78-3, a request to amend .the Land Use Element from Low Density Residential .to Medium Density Residential on 16.48 acres of land located south of Warner Avenue and east of .Bolsa Chica Street. . A legal description is on file, in the Planning Department. All interested persons are invited to attend laid hearing end express their, opinions for' or. against said . General Plan Amendment 78-3 Further information may- be obtained from the Office of the City . Clerk. 2000 Main Street,. Huntington Beach, C.A.- 92648 DATED: Nov 22; 1978 CITY ®F•. INOTON EFkH By Alfaia .Me Wentworth 'City Clerk .i .:, : .• •;Y•"•'i'rn•Px^•eu'i'•.•.r xWx aw.W...wars+n.s.mr.xnr.uN�:nnHP:•nan...,..`..nr:>•••:.•.I r r R Number of Excerpts SJ Publish Once LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, ( California, for the purpose of considering ewAnl PtAw kmem Dtutst fZe .c vrha 14o it'ldt u m DwS 14std sElOA oV\ JVV CLC K5 baax c� Avawe, alv�o� �asf cf— t U Ica 1ftEY-t VV 7�t))"- Ap Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7. 50 P.M. , on 16, 7� , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and ex ress their opinions for or against the proposed �-�¢�nQ ( P1gM 75-5 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this P�116t day of �o✓ , Iq 1b CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By . t NOTICE TOA CCL,EER,KI T(OO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM �'`�V�l\ \ � tl ' `C -t �� J TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: V�( r�4� PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE DAY OF -` � 197t AP's are attached AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other Adoption of .Environmental Status W YES 0 Refer to Sill 466wa4k , Planning Department - Extension 5277 for additional information. '� If appeal, please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal . / , 1 � I 9E086 9Z9Z6 ' 694t� ��c ' T ` 'e'eq 'P t�ogfiutaW ; aW0 9"T eDT� TTae LEOLi emass rm WpTs ff u TV 14® VTTQDMV r UTT*IiLu oA [ a M4s� 8Z-TZt-E9T 61-TZT-£9T to-TZ 49T 09Z6 L►9Z6 ° 9Z9L6 3TTIn. lwmm ttq 5vntr ;Tm Deli VISCO ;Tm 'tPaq wvaTwm OQSZ w8 O d %V vb TSOS mumv M 0509 COUI eca000sz - e load told d e'T=O 6wD S ; .&S TO OfL06 6"M 3TT�J 'U�eeH TwS TTZ06 3TTtR7 'eTTZA AT 3TM '1'Pee Eere Tv ls.vF� T!m P TV W Ar . r whOUT 9Z-E90-f 9T 97-TZT-f9T , OT-TZT-E9T 61P9Z6 90LZ6 69,9L6 otlowase eve Tea T6S9T ' Wr-UT3 =Ar& UMMMKM OSLO Tf►6T ��L U tttpr ; T��'S yl O S SI.-TZT-�9T 80-TZT49T M06 6"M 6v9Z6 MwO '40POR 3 6 ITTQJ °LF seeTTTeJ 'tP'�H t�gbtr t t GnnJMV OTITOwd S TK9T I � Z60S .TOZLT etm an d S ' rtswap J•taftS I 3 IR H PTA tZ-TZT49T ' i LO-TZT49T £L-EfO-£9T OtLO6. 699t6 ' Tu 6i9Z6 ill 'tmH TES jolt. ' MU � 7 ;vw i tao4bt 161LT ��q elm" 009 *A'J�M enTsTS UAE ' eQ I T*ft��U w4 Tv 4a Awlq= L '! �I I. T* 3 T t';t>ia1L,S cto-c9T1 ZZ-Ef0-E9i Et-TZT-E9T ' 90-TZT-f9T TZ09L 6t9Z6 ' 6t9Z6 sw"L •pao;pF+ct TTTs'J ' eH uor36trT7tnFt JTTVJ 't- Mnftnwm ; S09 um 'O'd mKP0 TM I O, SqTna obw "a=" SL(K UOVAR N.PTAM vxcuTcUR aiTaP* TV " am H PavtPTH Tt�f90-E9T Et-Ttt--E9T 1 t0-TZT-E9T 1 -Lf9t6 i 9t9Z6 'a I I otross,.>nooWp nH 3Tm 't R aogExrptav? ;TTV 'tFOne txxv"Ta m I ewl VTIGM TOM Guwi POTUDWO TZZLT LS9T =H 'O'd mom:, ukwiS ZU06mm R VEAL a ULM' sm M P29tplv I oZ-cm>491 j 17-TZT-E9T E0-TZT-E9T I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - j - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - -- OEM Pt�J 'oat .17 � mr) PL67 'TZ 'ems VATS eP�T=TM TOOK C-OL 1 T °�i wow TTZLT � � aS 3 3�8selt vNi 1 aowb M Towtpw OZ-TZT-£9T 1 6T-'f�f9T 1 I I 1 1 I L7132 - A iiarWr [duff:; Cii , txl�a �7tiiX9 iiIIIUUIPjWI mil, Calif hant ingt n Buach, (:alit : Sept. 25, 1978 (JH) 92647 12649 ' 146-241-25 - 163-281-01- t ;. MOM Norio et Al 1 4961 Las Patios Aveuxus 9340 balsa Avenue HtntlnQrbM Bosch, Calif ; WoRtminster, Calif 92649 192683 163-281-01, i - A®sir3�nt Brewer-harziaon Inc j dioold Muller 4471 Los Palos Avemm ; Breuer, C. J. a01 S GarfieLd Avenue bu ntir9ton Beach, Calif I 1750 L-adUara Vista Dive Suits '107 92649. ' Fullerton, Calif 92631 alluatxa, .Calif 91801 i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163-281--02,' Aeaident ; Sid-sy A C o"l;ey' et al Hobert P Cu ti.s Jr et al 4981 Lori Paton Av�ersae 1055 No&, Ave�e 4952 WHmer Averue �untington Bench, Calif Palm Sprinjs, Calif amtington &wadi, Calif 92649 I 92262 92649 . . . . _ .. ._ .. - -- - -� - - - - - . - - - - - - - -- - •- - -- -+ - - - - - -- - I 163-281=06 dieeti it , Virgie M Tack,aberz TheCas�ickje Ankirk Uev. Uo* ; 4952. 15 Broolhollow Drive Sempi ' � 5061 Warr wr Aveenue i Huntington Beach, Calif Hwtirgtdn HEswi, Calif 9 705 '. Calif 92649 '; 92647 . _ _ . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - _tie+alderslt - - - - - -- -.- - - - - _- - - ...� 146-241-46 - - - -- - - - •- - - = - - -- - - 163-,281-15 T Fiartk J MDlei I en Aquarius et all 414 Main Stiv6t ' 4942 Seapins Cy r�cls I Noon tbllavay arttingbon Leach, Calif Beach, Calif , 5075 Wanner Avenue 92648 92649 1 buntingtbn L*ac h, Calif 92649 _ _ . . . . . . . . . _ _ _ ._ _ �_ _ _ _ _ ._ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ - ' . .. _ i 163-2A1-05 ' Aeaei+dsnt Enrique G Qkng 8a, Calif Ed'am Co. 4932 Se� Circle 16992 C b u bw Large P.O. nu 111 Beach, Csi1f ' 1� k tia:gbat: tington D©aach; kalif ttntingban ease' Calif 92648 92649 92649 j Resident i 4931 Los Patios Averute ' I Huai beach, Calif 4931 S�e�it�e Circle 92649 H►sitingt n Death, Calif c 92649 Boaideat Chit of transportation 4941 Los Patos Avenue 120 So. Spring Street kknungton Beach, ciiif Los Angeles; Calif 90052 ' I 92649 Attn: Staff Assistant - B ; 1 1 V I I I a L63-121-29 IaLa H Penrod Gt r al Plat W21 Dwibar• Avenue 2.2 South of Warner a"t 17062 Lelsie lane Untinom Basch,•Calif of abl oa Chiba AMtitx3'tM Desch, Calif i2649 Sept. 25, 1978 (.hi) 92649 - . .._ .. _ .. _ ... _. - - _ __ .. _ - - - - - - - - - - L63-121-30 163-121-41 163-122-09 Jaxtara E.Baker Harold E TdAn .et al William H Wilem L70U B61sa-Chiba j 5142 Wa=nek Aviattue . j 16%1 Bolero Lane 6atttingbm Beach,.. Calif Ham,.beach'..Calif Hwtington Beach, Calif 02649: 92649 , . '92649 l'�j3-121 31 163-121-42 ; 163-122=10 low..M.Anderson AlaxwUlar C CroemM j William A Wood et al L7062 Bolas Chicea P.O. Boa= 1123 17092 .Hwtx3r ,Bluff Circle *MtingtM,Beams, Calif, a mt:ingtan Beech, Calif , HmtbWm Beach, Calif 92649 ' 92647 92649 163-121=32 163=121-43 ..163-131-06 Donee Kariios . ; Crowan Advatising ; F B Claximm et &1 L68W Pacific Ckaast taghway P.O. Boon 1123 250 Pgppy Aiert Beach, Calif Nuntingtan Beech, (Ali C axiia Dal Mar, Calif �0742 SM 92647 92625 163-121-33 163-121-44 163-131-•12 Litz" mrc ivy O Ara J'lAraLix et al 17M Doha Ctuca Stroet 2120 Main StZeet Suite 27:) 5142 'Morn Tree Lane AatW.VjW1 1, Calif tkatingb Beech, Calif Irvine, Calif 92649 92648 -.92715 163=121-34 161421-46 163-23i-16 4ilo E Ofte BLOODUA I Timothy SparQlar 2308 Iangboa uerive 2120 amain 17171 Harbor Bluffs Circle lwin Falls, Idaho ArAington Beach, Calif ; Htattingt m Beach, Calif 63301 92646 92649 163-121-35 163422-01 . i 163-131--17 K FrMk Wynia H. It. Neism 11 McCQra 2y 3976 Qcand View Blvd Apt 23 5142'.16=6k-.Avekam P.O. Bcct 2220 . LDs Anc3elea, Calif Hmtington.Basch, Calif seal Bea.%, Calif 90066 ; 260 92649 90746 163-121-36 163-122=0,d 163-"131-1.� �.401a J whilACx3 et al UNdA l H Cntg Tum Stadel ,401ta J LwIf ley 17062 Haag Bluffs Circle 3456 Plnaria Place P.O. Boon 103 "MLUNOM beach, Law Cbsta Masa, Calif �Artset Fteade, Calif 90742 92649 92626 1637121-38 163-123-65 163--131-19 tart W Na j id B tip, [eon-K 14)uie et a1 o72 street � 17052 Leslie 1445. C'a�� Melaw t • q Beach, Calif ; tturi o C a l.if Santa Bar3xara, Calif 92649 92649 93111 r� 1 NOTICE OF PUBIJC 15 AN rr GENVIAL PLAN AMFd!IDfNENT 78-3 NO`rlCB IS HEREBY gIVFN thwr s public hearing will be hil by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beath, in the Council Chamber of.the Civic Cen- ter, Huntington Brach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M.,or as won thereafter as pnwi- ble,on Monday the ltith day of Decem her,1978,for the purpose of considering General Plan Amendment 78 3,a request to amend the Land Ilse Element from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on f6.48 acres of land located south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica Street. A legal description is on file in the f Planning Department. All Interested-.person_a are invited to attend said hearing and.express.their opinions for or against said General Plan Amendment 79-3. Further information may he obtained from the Office of the City Clerk,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,Califor- nia 42649. _ Dated:November,22,1978. City(CITY OF`IICINTINGTON REACH Fly: ALICIA M:,WI:NTWOKTH, \ Pub.Nov.30,1978 Hunt.Beach Ind..Re Rev,tr10Sa9 I - I � 1 • WHITE-CITY ATTORNEY F BLUE-CITY CLERK , CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH No. ` " .GREEN-CITY ADMINISTRATOR CANARY-DEPARTMENTAL Nuan..cm"e.uM REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION Date Request made by Department Jovember 27,19 70 Bill Plnnni rs" INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Administrator's Office quickly as possible but not later than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it is to be introduced. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney's use in preparation of ordinance. In a separate paragraph outline briefly reasons for the request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject.All appropriation requests must be cleared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's Office. Preparation of an Ordinance or Resolution is hereby requested: Please prepare a rc.00i.u-c.'o 1. ai%or-% J nt-i- C'�:2C 'c.1 1 _a,:... ,.'T`:v.���:.C-b'V 70.=.3 rper attached draft. �>::_: : essCrIC:c.t- ?5 sc December 18, 1978 mee 17 . Desired effective date Signed: Approved as to availability of funds Director of Finance City Attorney—Please prepare and submit printed copies to this office by: // City Administrator GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78 - 3 December, 1978 huntlngton beach planning department��i r TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. 0 INTRODUCTION 1 1. 1 Methodology 1 2 .0 AREAS OF CONCERN 3 2 . 1 South of Warner Avenue and East of Bolsa Chica Street 3 3 . 0 AMENDMENT SUMMARY 19 3. 1 Summary of Proposed General Plan 19 Amendment 78-3 Appendix A Environmental Documents 21 Appendix B Dunbar Street Petitions 22 4 r . 1. 0 INTRODUCTION This document represents an amendment to the Land Use Element, and is the third amendment to the General Plan for 1978 . All previous amendments are reflected in the December 1976 Land Use Diagram as amended in 1977 and 1978 (Figures 1-1 and 1-2) . 1. 1 Methodology C This amendment to the General Plan addresses areas where changing conditions require reconsideration of past decisions . The land use change considered in this amendment results from a request by the Planning Commission. In Section 2 . 0, the area of concern is discussed in terms of existing conditions and impact on surrounding areas as well as consistency with City goals and policies. Section 3. 0 summarizes the recommend- ations contained in Section 2. 0 in the form of a comprehensive text and plan to be adopted. i i I 1 I Land Use Categories RESIDENTIAL M Estate <_2 un/gac M Estate 5 4 un/gac � f Low Density <_ 7 un/gac SA FPO - Medium Density <_15 un/gac I ' � G High Density >15 un/gac �,✓�,\ /,� , „ ; / COMMERCIAL General Office Professional ®Mixed Development 0 INDUSTRIAL General s `+p fbEii.... iiE:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiEiESiiEiEEii. ' ,, ?� PUBLIC USE .... €::�:�: 's:. , °,:..;. Public,9uasi-public, Institutional 1 o,�r Op en S p Pace i s PL ANNING NING UNITS nni v Pla n9 Reserve e Planned Community s. P OTHER USES Resource Production fS _ H 1 G - O 5 C _ _ F C 1 -- A Lam. P G, ef, / /,i' `,� cf -7. ? � al'ors .ter 6%/ - - soli.. r,ji_Fr q _ ,$ a n N `i - E - aA PACIFK I OCEAN -'ram,: -u�•'' .nr��V:'' .,�^^<vwm. �„_ I ® HUNI•INGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM PUNNING DEPARTMEI� Adopted December 1976 Revised AUGUST 1978 < r I I I Fp Blbp `fPG �q,�p 0� tiO4q ,t'�,� �q,Ppf �`p``'� CO �♦♦i � Fa, LEGEND cpq`e ♦,♦'♦.♦� °, ♦� s,♦`°�♦ "Pa ® Commercial eo`sq%�q a SP�Ora1 BG�ygQp °`♦�♦`° O.O POPES O, O, �o - glCOti f � ,Z,P O G'ti O, I ■ � s i ■ _ i PALM V j ■ / ORANGE / N PACIFIC COAST HWY ® Figure 1-2 HL19INGTON BE CH, GILIFORNIA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-2 2 . 0 AREAS OF CONCERN General Plan Amendment 78-3 addresses an area . that was continued from a previous amendment by the Planning Commission for further analysis. This area is identified in Figure 2-1. 2 . 1 South of Warner Avenue and East of Bolsa Chica Street 2. 1. 1 Background The area of concern encompasses 16 . 48 acres of land located on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street approximately 175 feet south of Warner Avenue (Figure 2-2) .' The study area is desiccnated low density residential, and the Planning Commission has directed the Staff to analyze alternative land use designations for the area, including medium density residential . The area of concern contains fifteen single family homes, a mushroom nursery, and vacant land, and is bisected by Dunbar Street, . a private road. Surrounding land uses include existing retail commercial and office professional uses to the north along Warner Avenue and recently constructed medium density fourplexes to the east. The property to the south is designated high density residential (R3) and is partially developed with 3 t u _ u MEDIUM ` DENSITY e � � tJ ( � O LOW .f. ; i .._...... _... .. ... ! , � DEN SITY r COMMERCIAL WARNER �3 3 i i I t , E 4 { , ........ .. i ...:..:.:... MEDIUM I M i '........ . , .............. :......... LOW DENSITY �J>`.......:.....:......... DENSITY ::::::..::.'::::•.......:,.,• t I i' .t l i ....... .......... .::::::>; is ...�+r.�..��` '' Y�'�r� `LOW LOW DENSITY r r DENSITY + H I�H .-. , DENSITY K. KT ; AVE ..__. _.... .._. AREA OF CONCERN 2.1 SOUTH OF WARNER AVENUE & EAST OF BOLSA CHICA STREET o c - p Figure 2- 2 O huntington beach planning department 4 I i i i -a ♦o c 6 ♦`O L�pO l9yO ��� y0��9 ���� '4Os Gb(O,y�`�fi P 90,y94 1`I�1♦'♦�♦i �I�` �� I■1 c°v ♦' 1�1 03;y F � 1`1♦'♦' 1` SDI` �q ' C4 1� `1� .1` ♦'♦ 4O� � 9y9 `1� ♦ % 1` ♦ Off? fi ♦ ` 0011 9�y ■ `0``P� easy `I`I ♦'' P`rS 'Ty _■ �p 940 `ICI ♦� po 5 9Cy 1.1 �♦ �S it �� Q)�' 0��9 ♦` '♦� �p46 A 0 1,1. 2.1 1 � °� ♦, i � I ♦ PALM V A y' ■ �I�1■11�a -- S T • /- ORANGE / N PACIFIC COAST HWY - � - Figure 2-1 PLANNING DEPARTWINGTON MENT'LIFORNIA CONCERN 1 AREAS OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 78-3 c ` apartments. High density apartments and a commercial/ office center exist to the west of the area of concern across Bolsa Chica Street. In response to requests from some of the property owners within the area of concern, the redesignation of this area was considered in General Plan Amendments 76-2 and 76-3, at which time the Planning Commission continued the matter, requesting that a detailed study of residential uses in the area be undertaken before amending the land use designation. The issues that were cited as concerns included the compat- ibility of the request with surrounding land uses and the availability of facilities such as open space and schools that would support an increase in residential density. This area of concern was also included in General Plan Amendment 77-1 (adopted August, 1977) . The request for redesignation was for medium density residential. However, because of the lack of supporting facilities, such as a park site, school, and sewers as well as the sight and sound distur- bances from Meadowlark Airport, the area of concern was retained as low density residential. In March, 1978, a request for a change of zone (Zone Change No. 78-5) was considered for the parcel at the northwest corner of Leslie Lane and Dunbar Street (approximately 0. 5 gross acres) . The request was to change the zone from R1, low density resident- ial, to R2 medium density residential. Staff recommended denial of the request based on the previous General Plan Amendment actions. The Planning Commission, however, approved the request and directed Staff to review the property north. of Dunbar Drive for medium density residential as part of the next General Plan Amendment. The City Council subsequently approved the zone change on April 3, 1978 . On August 30, 1978, the Planning Department received a petition from all of the property owners adjacent to the south side of Dunbar Street, requesting that the zoning be changed from Rl to R2 (see Appendix B) . This area was considered by the Planning Commission in General Plan Amendment 78-2, but again was continued for further analysis . Adlbk 2 . 1. 2 Analysis The area of concern is surrounded by a mixture of commercial, office professional, and residential development of varying age and intensity. Existing development within the area of concern is characterized by several older single family homes on half-acre lots served by a private unpaved road. The neighborhood in which the study area is located has under- gone a gradual transition from agricultural/equestrian uses to residential uses over the past decade, but the fragmented pattern of ownership and existence of homes has discouraged recycling and new construction in the low density area. An additional constraint to development in the area of concern is the presence of an old land fill dump site; this will be discussed in more detail later in this report . Given the surrounding land uses, the area of concern could feasibly support low, medium, or high density residential land uses, or possibly a combination thereof. A question is raised, however, with regard to the compatibility of additional residential development within the study area with the operation of Meadowlark Airport, which is located immediately north of the study area across Warner Avenue (Figure 2-3) . Concern has been voiced by the Airport Land Use Commission concerning probable sight and sound disturbances to future inhabitants within the study area. However, additional residential development on the property would still be affected by aircraft noise from planes taking off and would be exposed to the hazard of planes failing while attempting to take off. The City Council at its January 17 , 1977 meeting deleted the condition for placement of a blast fence at the north end of the Meadowlark runway. This action by the City Council will allow the planes an additional 150-200 feet of runway for take-off. This will allow the planes to be at a higher altitude when flying in the vicinity of the subject property, thus reducing the sight and sound disturbances (see Figure 2-4) . Active earthquake faults within the City of Huntington Beach, known specifically as the North Branch, Bolsa-Fairview and South Branch Faults, are all contained within the Newport- Inglewood Structural Zone. This fault zone enters the City in the Huntington Harbour area and extends in a south-easterly direction. Under the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Zones Act, Special Study Zones have been established within Huntington Beach. The General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach, December, 1976, details these special Study Zones on page 29 and sets forth guiding criteria. The southwestern portion of Area of Concern 2 . 1 is located within this special study zone (see Figure 2-5) . In addition, the City' s Department of Building 6 1 : . 1111111 ;�tt�t■at�uitltttlltltitnttl Is�M •• 1 IIItt�� fit. C� 111111111 �� �_ � � ■ ■• 111 �t t t t�i■1 11�� .� y ��■ � ��� � �nutttut•nttntt■ w l-i wWI,�ttttut■ ■ttutu �.ffffff■ffffff■ �r�Illfl„11,1111,11„1,,, 1111,,,111,1111111111�1, no no mm aloe if'� Hell Ave .. cn Meadowlark Golf Course U ro 0 Me lark Air,)ort Ave . 0 1000 2000 3000 SCALE IN FEET Figure 2-4 - CNEL 60 - 65 ® - CNEL 65 - 70 1974 ILM - CNEL 70+ MEADOW LARK AIRPORT CNEL 60, 65, AND 70 NOISE CONTOURS 8 z j J lqs- J T / (W;.M:'h' LARK MRFOR; ::........... ::>.>::>.... lt' A�"5: WARNER V. �i �AlM Y ...:.... ......:...... AREA OF CONCERN 2.1 J Z < 3 V G j �W a J a DLEwngr _ a _ a a a S a I Z... K TM DR :%'6?'... >...:.:... . . . ... t. .. f. i.. q. li:�:''' :: ii'::.:.:. ..:.. .. . y l C ETT EARTHQUAKE HAZARD SPECIAL STUDY . ZONE � a o Figure 2-5 O huntengt®n beach plarming department 9 and Community Development requires either an engineering geologist' s analysis of construction sites or that buildings for human occupancy be designed to resist a seismic force equal to . 186 gravity. These requirements are imposed for all discretionary acts. Loss of life and structural damage is thereby reduced. A portion of the area of concern, roughly south of Dunbar Street and extending some 700. fet east from Bolsa Chica Street, has .been identified by Archaeological Research, Incorporated as an archaeologically significant site. This is a small portion of the "Cogged Stone" site that extends down into the Bolsa Chica area. It has been identified as probably the most unique and important archaeological site remaining in the area. Over 200 cogged stones have been found to 'date on the entire site. Two important questions may be answered by this site. It has been proposed that the cogged stone is a time marker (i .e. , a distinct artifact type found only at a specific point in time) . Definition of the absolute dates represented would be an important contribution. A second consideration would be determination of the function of this artifact, if this was accomplished. The apparent random appearance of the artifact type in other sites may provide information concerning cultural relationships and interaction for the time period. In order to answer either one or both of these questions, a reasonable - number of these artifacts must be found in context (i .e. , in the . ground) and their association with many other types of archaeological materials must be determined. To date all of the cogged stones found at Ora-83 have been out of context and these are incapable of providing the type of information required. Development of this area appears to adversely affect this site. A qualified archaeologist should sufficiently clear construction areas of archaeological data prior to any grading for development. An archaeologist should also be present during all phases of grubbing and grading. If significant data are discovered during grading, the machinery should be diverted until adequate salvage is performed. As previously mentioned, the southern portion of the study area contains an old landfill dump site of approximately six acres . This site was used as a borrow pit in the early nineteen-forties and the resulting excavation was utilized as a class three dump site' for approximately thirty years. The average depth of the excavation appears to have been between thirty and thirty-five feet. The site is relatively level; sloping slightly to the southeast into a large waste oil sump in the southeast corner with mounds of dredged material , dumped fill, and debris . The natural soils on the site are primarily sandy with some clay, and mixed with concrete brick and bio- degradable debris, they provide a cover for the more volatile 10 hydrocarbon waste material found below. This waste material , primarily acid sludge residue from petroleum refining, emits strong odors when disturbed. Such odors were encountered during grading activities on Tract 9235, located immediately east of the study area. There are a number of measures that can be taken to mitigate the soils and odor problems on the dump site. A soils investigation prepared by Action Engineering Consultants recommends that existing surface soils be excavated and cleansod of debris and replaced as compacted fill . Any structures then placed on the property should be supported on .wood or concrete piles driven into native soils located beneath the trash fill. The soils report recommends treatment of the odiferous soil with a suitable chemical neutralizing agent prior to and during construction. This can be accomplished by diluting the neutralizing agent in a water truck and soaking the soil. This process would be most effective if the applic- ation were made prior to final grading, and properly driven pilings through the treatment zone would not impair the effectiveness of the treatment. The Department of Building and Community Development has indicated that the dump site is a problem area, 'but that the use of pile foundations would adequately support the main buildings. Concern was expressed that garages, paved areas, and concrete walls on the site may suffer damage from long-range settlement unless they are also supported on piles, but the extent of possible settle- ment is not known due to the questionable content of the landfill. If there is a possibility of long-range settlement, it would be most desirable to concentrate development into supported struc- tures, perhaps utilizing underground parking. An important issue in determining the appropriate density of residential uses in the area of concern is the availability of public services - water, sewer, and drainage - as well as schools and park facilities. The study area can be divided in two - a) those properties on either side of Dunbar Street and b) the Mola property (dump site) - to facilitate discussion of water, sewer, and drainage. Water service is available to the Dunbar properties via an eight-inch loop City system which runs from Bolsa Chica Street along Dunbar Street to Leslie Lane and then to Warner Avenue. This line was installed along with an eight-inch sewer via the establishment of a special assessment district for properties fronting on Dunbar Street in March 1978. These . lines are of sufficient size to accommodate any type of residential use, including high density. The Mola property will be able to draw Um 11 'i directly from the eight-inch water line in Bolsa Chica Street. Whereas the availability of water will not constrain residential development in the area of concern, sewer and drainage are critical concerns in determining allowable densities of residen- tial uses. Runoff from the westerly half of the study area presently flows to Bolsa Chica Street, which flows north to Warner Avenue and then easterly to Graham Street into a storm gutter. New development to the west of the study area and south of Warner Avenue will also create runoff that will follow the same flow pattern to Graham Street. The Department of Public Works' Master Plan of Drainage calls for the construction of a storm drain in Bolsa Chica Street between Pearce Street and Warner Avenue to accommodate drainage in the Warner/Bolsa Chica area. There are not sufficient funds at this time, however, to begin work on this storm drain. As a result, the storm gutter at Warner Avenue and Graham Street is somewhat overloaded. During periods of heavy runoff, there is a possibility of flooding occurring along Graham Street south of Warner Avenue, which could affect homes in the tract west of Graham Street. While the west half of the study area drains to the west, runoff from the eastern half flows generally east and south into vacant property located south of the study area. At the present time, Dunbar Street (east half) runoff flows through the medium density tract to the east, then south to the vacant area. Drainage from the dump site collects in the southeast corner of the property or flows south to the vacant area. The accumulation of runoff in this location, which is at or near sea level, is compounded by the presence of groundwater seepage. New development in the area of concern may augment the existing drainage problems in the general area, particularly if Dunbar Street is improved with pavement and gutters. On the other hand, new development can also be designed to be sensitive to these problems and can act as a catalyst to provide the necessary im- provements through the collection of fees or through the individ- ual efforts of developers. The drainage issue should be carefully addressed during the processing of development applications in the area of concern. Perhaps the most crucial issue in analyzing land use alternatives for the area of concern is the availability of sewer capacity to serve additional development in the study area. All sewage generated by development within the study area enters the Warner Avenue trunk sewer, which services an overall area of approxi- mately three square miles in northwest Huntington Beach. Sub- stantial new residential development within the service area in 12 recent years has resulted in chronic surcharging (overloading) of the Warner Avenue trunk. To alleviate this situation, the City has designed a new sewer to parallel the existing trunk west of Springdale Street. To date, only about one-third of the new , sewer has been constructed, and the City is currently negotiating with the Orange County Sanitation Districts to revolve financing and timing for the completion of the project. Until this project is completed, all proposals for new development in the service area should be carefully evaluated with regard to the additional burden they place on the Warner Avenue trunk sewer. To determine the possible impacts that may result from new devel- opment in the area of concern, four alternative land use config- urations have been presented (Figure 2-6) . The housing unit totals shown reflect the maximum number of units allowable under zoning districts applied to implement the General Plan designa- tions shown. The Department of Public Works has indicated that when the Warner Avenue trunk sewer project is complete, any of the four alternavies could be accommodated. Without completion of the new trunk sewer, however, lower density development would be preferable. Existing sewer facilities in the area include an eight-inch line in Dunbar Street which extends 850 feet east of Bolsa Chica Street, stopping 120 feet west of Leslie Lane. This line empties into another eight-inch line in Bolsa Chica Street, which flows northward to intercept the Warner Avenue trunk. Prop- erties located at the east end of Dunbar Street sewer eastward through existing residential tracts to the Kenilworth pump station which lifts sewage to the Warner Avenue trunk. The dump site could sewer directly to the Bolsa Chica line if development were concentrated on the western portion of the property (i.e, a planned development) . Any sewage produced on the eastern portion of the dump site would require the owner to either install a pump station to lift it to the Bolsa Chica line or obtain an easement across the property to the south to allow a tie-in with an existing line in Greenleaf Lane. In all of the alternatives, it is important that the majority of sewage be directed to Bolsa Chica Street. The four alternatives presented can also be used to compare the anticipated impacts of a change in land use designation on the availability of schools and open space in the general area. Using the General Plan criterion of 2. 0 acres of neighborhood park land . per 1000 persons, the quarter section in which the area of concern is located has a present demand of 3. 4 acres of neighbor- hood park land and an ultimate demand of 4. 6 acres. Redesignation of the area of concern according to alternatives B, C, or D would increase this demand by 0. 1, 0. 3, and 0. 6 acres, respectively. 13 7�7 ER t WARNER r ? I 1 - 1 -T---� COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL _ oia+iBaR�art; c!> tri :::::::::::::::.. :::::::::::::::: o ..... . :::::: 5 ::::::::::::: o T ..... : 45 :::,: ::*:,::::::: DENSITY DENSITY ` LOW DENSITY MEDIUM DENSITY'; WARNER WARNER COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL ............ Tr p :y.': i' t. DENSITY `' G\ DENSITY L� o o p Figure 2-6 O huntington beach planning department 14 At this time there is no neighborhood park, although the Master Plan of Parks identifies a site to be developed within the quarter section by 1984. Any new development or increase in density in the area of concern will intensify the demand for a neighborhood park while reducing vacant land for acquisition and development. The area of concern is served by the Ocean View Elementary School District and Huntington Beach Union High School District. The four alternative land use configurations would generate the following numbers of students: A B C D Elementary 55 58 58 73 High School 21 22 22 27 Junior College 17 18 18 23 With the exception of alternative D, almost identical numbers of students would be generated. The most critical impact would occur at the elementary school level. These students would attend Marine View School which is currently under capacity but already has students in attendance from other areas awaiting construction of a new elementary school south of Slater Avenue. The Ocean View School District has indicated; however, that new students from the area of concern could be assimilated at existing schools if necessary. M The final issue to be analyzed involves the amount of traffic generated by the various alternative designations and the impact on circulation in the general area. Existing traffic volumes on Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street at the area of concern are 17, 600 and 2, 000 vehicles per day. The increase in daily traffic from new development under the proposed designations would be as follows: Vehicles/Day A B C D Warner Avenue 150 145 145 400 Bolsa Chica Street 540 645 890 1040 The impact of traffic created by new development in the study area on Warner Avenue is negligible (1-2%) . The impact on Bolsa Chica Street, however, is much greater, with the increase over existing traffic volumes ranging from 27 to 52 percent. 15 2. 1. 3 Summary and Recommendation This section will summarize the issues addressed in the above analysis and present the staff ' s recommendation. 1. Surrounding Land Uses - Given the existing residential and commercial uses that surround the area of concern, the low density and medium density designations presented in Figure 2-6 would all be compatible uses. 2 . Meadowlark Airport - As long as the airport continues to operate, effort should be taken to minimize the number of new residential uses located in or near the flight path or subject to takeoff noise. Alternatives A or B would be the most desirable to accomplish this. 3. Earthquake Hazard Study Zone - Due to the study area' s inclusion in or approximation to the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Study Zone, all development should be accompanied by a geologist' s report and suitable pro- visions taken to prevent structural damage or personal injury in the event of an earthquake. Both low and medium density development would be allowable if safe structural design were utilized. 4. Archaeological. Site - Both low and medium density land use designations would be allowed if the appropriate excavation and/or preservation procedures were followed. 5. Landfill Dump Site - There are two basic approaches that can be taken to make this site developable - either remove the fill material and construct on native soils or compact over the fill and construct foundations sup- ported on piles driven through the fill to native soils underneath. Removal of the dumped materials would require extensive excavation and would generate strong unpleasant odors that would affect numerous local resi- dents. If pile construction were utilized, it would be desirable to concentrate development in supported structures and maximize open space on the site. This could be accomplished best by limiting the density and applying the planned development zoning suffix. 6. Water and Drainage - Water is available to support both low and medium density land uses in the area of concern. New development at either density will increase runoff to areas which have occasionally experienced flooding problems, but may also generate revenue for construction of new facilities to accommodate this runoff. 16 7. Sewer Capacity - The availability of capacity in both the Bolsa Chica sewer and the Warner Avenue trunk is a major issue when considering changes in land uses or development applications in the area of concern. The cumulative impacts of new development in the sewer ser- vice area must be considered. To date, a total of 237 new units have been approved in the area located south of Warner Avenue and west of Bolsa Chica Street that will be coming on line in the next six months. Any increase in density in the area of concern that results in addi- tional sewage in the Bolsa Chica line will augment an already serious problem. Although the new Warner trunk is designed to relieve problems in this area, the project has not been approved by the City Council and will not be available to serve any new development that may result from redesignation of land uses in the area of concern. For this reason, alternatives A and B are the only designations that can be recommended at this time. 8. Schools and Open Space - Local school districts have indicated t at there is sufficient capacity to accommo- date students generated by any of the four .alternative designations. Any increase in density in the area of concern will intensify the demand for open space in an area with no neighborhood park. The City may wish to explore the possibility of accqiring a .portion or all of the dump site to provide open space for local resi- dents, considering the soils condition and development problems mentioned above. If this were desirable, the open space land use designation could be utilized for -a portion of the study area, which in turn could allow an increase in density on the remainder of the area of concern. 9. Traffic and Circulation - Alternatives B and C will effectively eliminate through traffic between low and medium density areas on Dunbar Street. Alternatives A and D will preserve access from both arterials. Traffic impacts will be greatest on Bolsa Chica Street, where up to a 50 percent increase over existing traffic volumes may occur if _Alternative D is implemented. Based on the analysis of the above issues, the Planning Department recommends either Alternative A, retention of low density residential for the entire area of concern, or Alternative B, which would redesignate the northeast 1. 66 gross acres of the area of concern medium density residential and retain the low density residential designation on the remaining 14. 82 acres. 17 2 . 1 .4 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that the medium density residential designation be adopted for 13. 65 acres of the area of concern, as shown in Figure 2-7 below. The Commission retained the low density residential designation on the north west 2 . 83 acres and has requested that Staff_ analyze the feasibility of a commercial designation for this property as part of General Plan Amendment 79-1. WARNER 7-1-T-1-r- - COMMERCIAL ............... ...... .. . ................. ................. ........ ............... .......... .... L01NV .. ....................:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ...... ...... - D ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::: ::::::::::::: .............. ..... ....:.:::::: ............................................ .................................... .....:.. O ::::::::::::::::::.::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::......::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::: :::...... ..::::..:::::::....• ® €€ ......................... :::::::::::. DENSITY Q. Figure 2-7 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Ism I= 18 3. 0 AMENDMENT SUMMARY 3. 1 Summary of Proposed General Plan Amendment 78-3 PROPOSED LAND USE ACREAGE SUMMARY Existing Proposed Net Land Use Category Gross Acres Gross Acres Gross Acres Residential Low Density 16. 48 2 . 83 - 13 .65 Medium Density 0 13 .65 + 13 . 65 Total land area involved in the amendment: 16. 48 gross acres 19 NET PROJECTED POPULATION CHANGE. Residential Net Gross Max. Units/ Total Population Estimated Type Acres Gross Acre Units Per Unit Population Low Density - 13 . 65 x 7 95 x 3. 25 = - 309 Medium Density +13 . 65 x 15 = 204 x 2 . 30 = +469 +160 20 I 1 6 F9Cy �g� tiP� ,C_a 441,ti 101. 0111 C'O � lot fsi SP 9qp `• ♦' INS '• •`• \•` ♦'♦ a?aa Medium Density Residential 04, 9 � qp ♦ �i r \ ! - QO�♦'. � �9 P`.`\ �/.- \PA \ OC� O �F ■ > i c PALM _ > V y N ■ S _ 0,0I0I0`+ ORANGE // N PACIFIC COAST HWY - ® Figure 3-1 lopHUNTINGTON BE CH, (ALIFORNIA PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 700 -3 APPENDICES APPENDIX A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: File PROJECT,APPLICA110N, OR PERMIT NO GPA 7 8--3 PROJEC`C'FITLE/DESCRUPI'�ON/LOCATIO)N: Request to redesignate 16 . 48 acres of property located south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica trt w Density Residential to :Medium Density Residential City of Huntington Beach EXEMPTION IDENTIFICAUON: Categonivil Exen;ptiou ❑ Ongoing Project �J See. See.15070 Chas Enrc--Tiem-7,Exemption a Activity not Defined w Project Sac.1 i071 (b) 8: (c)• Sec.15037 (b) f-1 MininterelProject Other(Explain) See.15073 u Ilie lr :ect(private)�,, r. itmer poYc ox ucaotlaer project for which an EIR ham previously been prepared;the original irrojcc! and EiR wcxc approved. end theie were no subatantial changes proposed in the project to involve new environn►entai impucte,not c onaidervd in the orighud EIR. (Sec.15067) I OriginA El?Number: EIR 7 7—3 Date Approved: 8/1/7 7 1'ursutni to ihr,;;ALFFC)M& ENNYIt:ZEIMENTAL QUA:.Ify ACT OF 1970 and provisions of the HUNMGTON i3 CrY t RDiitihlvf E CODL,which fnnridc that an:aclivity is exempt from environmental evaluation where it can be c'.e.et.,n:rud vrid• vc:tiirty i+gat "at actkity will not have a significant effect on the environment,the activity reiercaaca;3 lc;Ken is tliem-fore gnuite3 UFMMON STA` S with the following statement of findings: Assistant Planner Sept. 5, 1978 yea$and Title oi Penor, d.ei-tti>Fying Requta Date: 21 I APPENDIX B 2 August 23, 1978 `' Iiiuitizwton Beach P1a1;��lzz; (;o):�:iocj3.on 4 (Avio �, �t:r,tur Bldz, 5 i� Iluutington Beach, Cal. 6 Dear. Sire; 7 The undor:,1.ancd oancru of property on the Scubl, tj :.31(1.l? M Dunbar SO, i;c:�n,,.; loop of. tho ownevo of all of the orrucro, horoby petQoL you to oban,;e the zonloo from 2-1 to R-2 0 They are liotod below otartitg from tho Mat oldo 10 which icy already R 1]. C� jkle.man der C. CroJ"Ii-, ��� ��� . (� `��• � u'� �-� 1.2 AP f!1 6y-1 21-42 Cro:;inan AC vet•', wH3 Go . AT A 01,� % L ,, ��� Se- . ].rl 63-121 -43 K') l II Nola J. Wallace - l£3 ;i i Q-141 - 6 w 37 �. Ill' ;: -1 �?"J - � , jo • n� y n 22 Thomao Eva Gs hardo3 Ai' i 16j- 1L1-j2 a24 OWN Rule I ,,, � f►i' a, 163-1 .:1 -34 26 28 29 30 CA 31 22 August 23, 1978 APPENDIX B �Iiiintir s tnn Bee.oh Planning Commioei.on Civic Cc;nt,er Bldg Huntington Beach, Cal. 6 7 Dear airs; The unlersigned owners of property on the South 8 side of Dunbar St. ,being 10056 of the owners or all of the owners, hereby petf tion you to obange the zoning from A-1 9 to. R-2. They are listed below startirp, from the East aide 10 which is already R-2. 11 ;i1ex,lin6er C. Crosmuy: �CL_�<.� �.,�-. �� � ��• it��c^�t.�c� 12 A.P #163-1 ;�1-42 ] ' Cro:jwan Ai�ver'-i�ing Co. .�^� � =•�_ � ,j' 14 AP;r163-1 �1 -43 1.5 Robert i.arger �i�- �'�.�l.� 16 Clara karger AP �r`; 63-121-38 39 _ 17 Nola J.. Wallace / ell 18 AP iii6j-� c1 -36 Cc 3? 19 20 Frank YIyneo _ AP ;r163-12,'1 -35 21 22 Thowas '4,,i rdor, Eva G. 1-.ardos 23 AP n 1 G j-1 c 1 -1,2 & 313 ru. Gi 24 Ri ctid rC� rai .e 25 psi. ?, 1 6 3-1 .- 1-3 4 ;6 27 28 PLA"I" INC 29 i 1978 AU G 30 31 P. 0. Uo:; 1 �U Hunting1ton BL'ach, CA 92643 32